Novel Pharmacotherapy Approaches in Smokers With Serious Mental Illness
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Nicotine Dependence
Sponsor: University of California, San Diego

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COVER PAGE 
 
 
 
 
Study title: Novel Pharmacotherapy Approaches in Smokers with Serious Mental Illness 
 
 
ClinicalTrials.Gov (number NCT04011280) 
October 28, 2021 
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 2 
 
UCSD Human Research Protections Program 
New Biomedical Application 
RESEARCH PLAN – REVISED October 28, 2021 
Instructions for completing the Research Plan are available on the HRPP website. 
The headings on this set of instructions correspond to the headings of the Research Plan. 
General Instructions: Enter a response for all topic headings.  
Enter “Not Applicable” rather than leaving an item blank if the item does not apply to this project. 
Version date: 9/30/2013
1.
PROJECT TITLE
Novel Pharmacotherapy Approaches in Smokers with Serious Mental Illness 
 
2.
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR  
Robert M. Anthenelli, M.D. 
 
3.
FACILITIES 
Pacific Treatment and Research Center (Pac-TARC) 
Department of Psychiatry (MC-0603) 
UC San Diego Health Sciences 
3252 Holiday Ct. Suite 200 
La Jolla, CA 92037 
 
The Pacific Treatment and Research Center (Pac-TARC) is located at 3252 Holiday Court, La Jolla, CA 
92037, across the street from the main UCSD campus. This 3000 sq. ft. office space includes 6 independent 
offices for use by laboratory staff; a medical examination room; psychophysiology suite; conference room; a 
locked, dedicated, temperature-controlled medication storage room that contains double-locked medication 
storage cabinets; laboratory space for preparing biological specimens; a waiting room; and a break room. The 
medical examination room is equipped with an examination table and ECG equipment, and the laboratory is 
equipped with a tabletop centrifuge and a sample storage refrigerator and freezer.  
 
4.
ESTIMATED DURATION OF THE STUDY 
The estimated duration of the study, from HRPP approval to HRPP closure for recruitment and data analysis is 
up to four years. The investigators received an administrative extension to the protocol due to recruitment 
delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 
 
5.
LAY LANGUAGE SUMMARY OR SYNOPSIS (no more than one paragraph) 
Sixty chronic smokers with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who are motivated to try 
to quit smoking will be randomized to receive smoking cessation treatment with the FDA-approved medication, 
varenicline, delivered either a) at its standard dose and titration schedule (half of the participants) versus b) at 
a lower dose and slower titration schedule (the other half), for 12 weeks. All smokers will choose a target quit 
date sometime between 8 to 35 days after starting the medication.  All participants will receive ten 30-minute 
sessions of a behavioral treatment called Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Participants will be 
followed for an additional 12 weeks off study medication.  The major endpoints are the percentage participants 
quitting smoking and the incidence of psychiatric side effects.  We will also conduct a blood test that measures 
the breakdown of nicotine in the body to see if that measure influences treatment response and side effects. 
 
6. 
SPECIFIC AIMS 
Aim 1. To examine the feasibility of combining ACT with two different varenicline-assisted quitting strategies: 
a) slower titration of lower dose varenicline, versus b) standard titration of standard dose varenicline - - both 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 3 
delivered using a flexible quit date paradigm that allows gradual preloading of varenicline prior to the target 
quit date (TQD).  
     Hypothesis 1A. There will be high demand from SMI smokers to participate in the trial as evidenced by 
achieving targeted accrual rates and budgeted recruitment costs.  
     Hypothesis 1B. Combining ACT with both dosing strategies will be practical as evidenced by high rates of 
study and ACT counseling session retention, and completion of study procedures.  
     Hypothesis 1C. Acceptability of the flexible quit date and varenicline dosing strategies will be high as 
demonstrated by good adherence to making a quit attempt within the quit window and taking at least 80% of 
prescribed study medication doses. Satisfaction with ACT either delivered in person or via telephone will be 
high consistent with our prior work in bipolar smokers.  
 
Aim 2. To explore whether nicotine clearance rate as measured by the plasma 3’-hydroxycotinine / cotinine 
NMR influences the incidence of NPSAEs and medication tolerability in varenicline-treated SMI smokers.  
     Hypothesis 2. We hypothesize that slow nicotine metabolisers will exhibit trends for more neuropsychiatric 
adverse events (NPSAEs) of any severity to standard varenicline dosing compared with normal metabolisers 
treated with low dose varenicline. 
 
7.
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE 
People with SMI such as bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) smoke tobacco 
cigarettes at a rate 3-4 times higher than the general population (1,2) and are disproportionately affected by 
tobacco-related diseases and premature death (3). SMI smokers also have a harder time quitting smoking 
than NMI tobacco users. Recent evidence from our group derived from the multinational Evaluating Adverse 
Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study (EAGLES; 4) measures this reduction in quit rates as 35% lower 
in BD (5) smokers and 54% lower in SSD smokers (6), respectively, compared with NMI smokers using the 
1st-line smoking cessation medications and standard counseling. However, EAGLES results likely reflect a 
best case scenario given that its participants were highly motivated to try to quit, were psychiatrically stable, 
and received rigorous smoking cessation treatment. That only 2 in 10 SMI smokers in EAGLES were able to 
stop smoking at 6 months speaks to the need to develop new strategies to help SMI smokers quit. That only 
~5% of EAGLES SMI smokers administered placebo quit, despite all of them receiving standard counseling, 
highlights the importance of developing improved behavioral interventions as adjunctive treatment.  
 
Although most studies in stably treated SMI smokers find that the 1st-line smoking cessation medications are 
generally well-tolerated and that smoking cessation does not exacerbate psychiatric symptoms (1,2), SMI 
smokers are 3- to 5-times more likely to develop moderate to severe NPSAEs when engaged in a medication-
assisted quit attempt compared with NMI smokers (5,6). The risk appears highest among smokers with BD: in 
the EAGLES trial, ~15% of varenicline-treated BD smokers experienced moderate to severe NPSAEs when 
trying to quit compared with 2% of varenlicine-treated NMI smokers (5). While the incidence of moderate to 
severe NPSAEs as defined in EAGLES was not significantly different from placebo among BD smokers, the 
incidence of NPSAEs of any severity was significantly higher begging the question whether lower dosages of 
the medication can be used to lower side effects in some individuals without compromising efficacy.  
 
Over the past two decades there have been improved efforts to address this neglected epidemic in harder-to-
treat SMI smokers (1); however, in general, advancements in cessation treatment research among SMI 
smokers far lags that of NMI smokers. Additionally, exciting new research results such as 1) how genetically 
informed biomarkers of nicotine clearance moderate smoking cessation medication treatment outcomes (7), 2) 
varenicline preloading increases smoking cessation rates (8), and 3) novel behavioral interventions such as 
ACT therapy can boost quit rates (9,10), have not been adequately tested in SMI smokers. Thus, the purpose 
of this proposal is to test the feasibility of whether these treatment innovations can be applied in SMI smokers 
with high rates of demand, practicality and acceptability for subsequent use in a large randomized clinical trial 
(RCT).  
 
How Does an SMI Smoker’s NMR Affect Treatment Response and Adverse Event Propensity? The NMR 
as measured by the ratio of 3’-hydroxycotinine (the breakdown product of cotinine) divided by the 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 4 
concentration of cotinine (the breakdown product of nicotine) in a smoker’s blood or urine is a genetically-
informed biomarker of nicotine clearance (7). It is a surrogate measure of CYP2A6 activity - - the liver enzyme 
that catabolizes nicotine and other drugs and which is under genetic control11. Studies in NMI smokers have 
found that classifying smokers into slow versus normal nicotine metabolisers based on a cutoff score for this 
ratio affects how that individual is likely to respond to the 1st-line smoking cessation medications both in terms 
of treatment efficacy and propensity to develop side effects (7,12). The NMR predicts treatment responses to 
varenicline delivered at standard doses: among slow metabolisers, which represents ~40% of the general 
population of NMI smokers, varenicline users had comparable quit rates to nicotine patch-treated smokers and 
were more vulnerable to side effects than normal metabolisers. However, varenicline standard dose treatment 
produced higher quit rates than patch in normal metabolisers (7). To our knowledge, the NMR ratio has not 
been examined in a RCT of varenicline in SMI smokers. This gap is important to fill given that varenicline is the 
most effective monotherapy treatment for SMI smokers and these individuals have a greater propensity to 
develop NPSAEs. 
 
Would Lower Dosages of Varenicline Be Better Tolerated, Especially Among Slow Metabolisers? It is 
also important to determine whether a lower dose of varenicline can be used in some smokers to reduce 
medication side effects without significantly reducing efficacy. Our earliest work with the medication in a Phase 
II trial in NMI smokers found that 0.5 mg twice daily titrated varenicline - - one-half of what eventually became 
the FDA-approved titrated dose of 1 mg twice daily, produced similar quit rates to the approved dose (13), a 
result confirmed in a related Phase II varenicline trial (14) and a recent Phase IV trial (15). However, all of 
these studies also found lower rates of treatment emergent AEs in the lower dose varenicline group. While 
none of the earlier studies focused on NPSAEs, in the Oncken et al. trial (2006) discontinuation rates due 
to AEs and the incidence of nausea, insomnia, and abnormal dreams were markedly lower among low-dose 
treated participants compared with standard-dose treated smokers (13; see Table 2). Reducing NPSAEs in 
SMI smokers is particularly salient because, as we have shown in the EAGLES trial (see Figure 2), BD and 
SSD smokers are 3- to 5-times more likely than NMI smokers to experience moderate to severe NPSAEs 
when trying to quit using 1st-line medications or placebo. Moreover, although at times difficult to disentangle 
from negative affective symptoms associated with nicotine withdrawal, our more recent analysis of NPSAEs of 
any intensity level in BD smokers reveals a 61% increase among varenicline-treated participants compared 
with placebo (see Table 1), begging the question whether lower doses might help reduce the incidence of 
NPSAEs.  
 
How Might Varenicline Preloading Affect Quit Rates in SMI Smokers? Another new finding that has not 
been adequately tested in SMI smokers is the potential beneficial effects of varenicline preloading to enhance 
quit rates. Extending pre-quit treatment with varenicline prior to TQD has been found to reduce smoking and 
urges to smoke among non-treatment seeking NMI smokers (16), and to enhance quit rates in treatment-
seeking NMI smokers compared with individuals treated with standard varenicline dosing and TQD (8,17,18). 
A derivative of this strategy that employed a flexible quit date paradigm with standard varenicline dosing in 
NMI smokers produced significantly higher odds of quitting with varenicline compared to placebo with similar 
safety between groups (19). While all of the aforementioned studies excluded individuals with 
psychiatric conditions from participating, the mechanisms underlying enhanced quit rates with varenicline 
preloading may be particularly salient in SMI smokers. Since these individuals are more nicotine dependent 
than NMI smokers (20), the tempo with which partial agonism of α4β2 nicotinic acetycholine receptors 
(nAChRs) occurs in relation to the TQD likely influences neuroadaptive changes in nAChR density, activity and 
turnover (21,22). From the perspective of extinguishing learned smoking behaviors (17,18), SMI smokers 
might benefit more by cigarettes becoming less satisfying to help “unlearn” that cigarette smoking alleviates 
negative affect. There is also the possibility that such use of varenicline will increase an SMI smoker’s self-
efficacy since the number of cigarettes smoked should gradually reduce, rendering the smoker less nicotine 
dependent (19,23).  
 
Can Varenicline Be Combined With Behavioral Treatment Targeting Quitting- and Illness-Related 
Distress Tolerance to Enhance Tolerability and Efficacy? While there is broad agreement that the best 
way to quit smoking is by combining evidence-based behavioral and pharmacological treatments (24,25), the 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 5 
optimal combination of treatments is not known. This is important for SMI smokers who have a harder time 
quitting and experience more NPSAEs yet receive the same standard behavioral counseling as NMI smokers.  
ACT takes a different approach to smoking cessation counseling that might lend itself well to SMI smokers 
making a varenicline-assisted quit attempt. It focuses on increasing acceptance of aversive physical and 
emotional states that commonly occur during nicotine withdrawal as smoking triggers, and teaches the skills 
(e.g., mindfulness) for allowing these feelings to come and go without acting on them by smoking (9,10). In the 
context of varenicline preloading, ACT’s mindfulness strategies, along with the drug’s reduction in smoking 
satisfaction and urges to smoke (8,18) might synergize to help boost quit rates. Changes in affective states 
related to the smoker’s illness itself, nicotine withdrawal, or, possibly, medication side effects, might be 
ameliorated and/or cause less distress through the combined effects of ACT and varenicline. 
Preliminary Studies: Varenicline Is the Most Effective Monotherapy in SMI Smokers, Yet Still, < 25% of 
Smokers Are Able To Achieve 4-Week Continuous Abstinence: The EAGLES trial accrued the largest 
samples of smokers with BD (N = 285) and SSD (N = 390) ever assembled in a double-blind, placebo- and 
active- (nicotine patch [NRT]) RCT comparing varenicline 1 mg twice daily and bupropion 150 mg twice daily. 
The study was designed to be able to compare smokers having these and other psychiatric disorders with 
smokers without a history of mental illness (NMI smokers in the non-psychiatric cohort or NPC in the figures 
below). Our major efficacy findings were: a) Across all treatments, and in contrast to NMI smokers, BD 
smokers (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.43 - 0.97) and SSD smokers (OR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.32 – 0.66) were 35% 
and 54% less able to quit smoking, respectively; b) Among BD and country-matched NMI smokers, only 
varenicline had better efficacy than bupropion, NRT and placebo (see Figure 1a, left panel). c)Among SSD 
and all NMI smokers, all 3 active treatments had better efficacy than placebo, and varenicline was superior to 
bupropion and NRT (see Figure 1b, right panel). 
 
 
Regardless of Treatment, SMI Smokers Were 3- to 5-Times More Likely to Experience Clinically 
Significant NPSAEs than NMI Smokers: Using a composite primary neuropsychiatric safety endpoint 
developed in consultation with the U.S. FDA4, we found the risk for moderate to severe NPSAEs was 
significantly higher in SSD smokers (Risk Difference [RD]% = 3.96; 95% CI = 1.63 – 6.29) and BD smokers 
(RD% = 7.73; 95% CI = 4.15 – 11.3) compared with NMI smokers. The observed incidence of the primary 
composite NPSAE endpoint for the two groups is depicted below (see Figures 2a and 2b). Although there 
was no evidence for a significant risk difference by treatment in the BD subcohort, the observed incidence of 
clinically significant NPSAEs was highest among varenicline-treated participants. 
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 6 
 
 
Rates of NPSAEs of Any Severity Were Higher Among Varenicline BD Smokers Compared with 
Placebo BD Smokers: In contrast to the pre-specified primary composite safety endpoint that was designed 
to capture clinically significant, moderate to severe NPSAEs, Table 1 below illustrates the rates of NPSAEs 
reported at ≥ 1% at any severity level (mild, moderate or severe) and coded according to the MedDRA 
category psychiatric disorders. Compared with placebo, varenicline-treated BD smokers had significantly 
higher rates of NPSAEs of any intensity, including sleep disorders. 
 
 
 
Lower Dosage Varenicline is Associated with Fewer Adverse Events and Only Modestly Reduced 
Efficacy: The PI was a member of the “Varenicline Study Group” for an early Phase II trial that evaluated the 
safety, tolerability and efficacy of 4 varenicline dose regimens (13). Of relevance to this study was the contrast 
in that trial between the 0.5 mg twice daily titrated arm versus the 1 mg twice daily titrated dosing regimens. 
We found no significant difference in quit rates between the two groups: Low dose 44%; High dose 49% vs. 
Placebo 11.6% (p < .0001 vs. both doses). However, adverse events across the two groups were markedly 
lower in the low dose group as illustrated below (see Table 2) resulting in a 35% drop in treatment 
discontinuations due to AEs in the low dose arm.  
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 7 
ACT Is Well-Tolerated and Facilitated Quitting in BD Smokers: In a study in bipolar smokers, ACT showed 
preliminary evidence of facilitating quitting: 40% of BD smokers receiving 10 sessions of in-person ACT in 
combination with NRT patch, and 33% of BD smokers receiving 6 telephone sessions, achieved short-term (7-
day PP) abstinence at end of treatment (9). There was also evidence that ACT increased participants’ ability to 
accept cravings to smoke (>50% increase), and it was highly acceptable to participants with 80% retention and 
90% satisfaction with in-person treatment and 67% retention and 100% satisfaction with telephone treatment 
(9). Regarding its potential for dissemination, ACT has preliminarily demonstrated higher 30-day quit rates 
than standard quit line counseling at 6-month follow-up (31% in ACT vs. 22% in standard counseling; 10), and 
this effect was even more pronounced among depressed smokers (33% in ACT versus 13% in standard 
counseling).  
 
8.
PROGRESS REPORT 
Progress reports to UCSD HRPP and TRDRP are submitted annually.  
 
9.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 
Overview: This pilot trial is a Phase IV, 12-week, single center, randomized, double blind, parallel group 
comparison of low (0.5 mg twice daily with slower titration over one full week) versus standard dose (1.0 mg 
twice daily with standard titration) varenicline in SMI individuals with DSM-V BD or SSD with a 12-week, post-
treatment follow-up (see Figure 3 for study design). The 16 visits after screening (Weeks 0-24) will take place 
using the guidelines developed by the UCSD Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research. Participants will be 
screened, randomized and follow the protocol according to the Research Ramp-Up phase under which the 
university is operating at that time of (i.e., orange, yellow, or green).  
 
Full participation includes 14 treatment visits and 3 follow up visits. All in-person visits will take place at Pac-
TARC. In addition to testing low dose varenicline in SMI smokers for the first time, three other innovative 
design features are incorporated to try to improve medication tolerability and short-term quit rates. 1) Plasma 
will be obtained at baseline to measure participants’ NMR and to identify slow versus normal nicotine 
metabolisers. 2) A flexible quit date (between days 8-35) will be employed allowing varenicline preloading to 
occur prior to the TQD. 3) Ten sessions of ACT for smoking cessation will be delivered by trained counselors 
first in 7 in-person sessions followed by 3 sessions delivered via telephone to all participants. Randomization 
of participants will occur in a 1 (low dose) to 1 (standard dose) ratio and participants will be balanced on 
diagnosis (BD vs SSD), gender, race (White vs. non-White) and whether or not they are taking antiepileptic 
medications (e.g., carbamazepine) as mood stabilizers (20) which, like the demographic/ethnic factors (11,26) 
can influence CYP2A6 activity and affect the NMR. Volunteered, observed and solicited NPSAEs will be 
assessed using standardized procedures developed in EAGLES and our other prior work (4,27). However, 
going beyond EAGLES, we will also assess participants’ tobacco withdrawal symptoms, urges to smoke, sleep 
disturbances, self-efficacy & confidence to quit, and satisfaction with the protocol elements. To further extend 
EAGLES, we will include more “real world” participants who are somewhat less psychiatrically stable and who 
have comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) in early remission.  

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 8 
 
 
All study procedures described below are considered investigational carried out solely for research purposes. 
varenicline is an FDA-approved medication (NDA# 21-928) for the treatment of smoking cessation in a wide 
range of individuals, including those with SMI that will be studied here. An IND exemption is attached to this 
proposal as this study 1) is not intended to be reported to FDA as a well-controlled study in support of a new 
indication for use nor intended to be used to support any other significant change in the labeling for 
varenicline; 2) is not intended to support a significant change in the advertising of varenicline; 3) does not 
involve a route of administration or dosage level change or use in a patient population or other factor that 
significantly increases risks associated with varenicline; 4) is conducted in compliance with requirements for 
instructional review with the requirements of informed consent; and 5) is not intended to promote or 
commercialize varenicline.  
 
Participants: Approximately 90 participants will be screened and undergo written informed consent to arrive 
at 60 adult men and women (anticipated 33% screen failure rate) with DSM-V BD (Type I or Type II, N = 30) or 
SSD (schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, N = 30) and who are chronic smokers of ≥ 10 cigarettes per 
day will be recruited to participate in this pilot trial. Each group will include ~ 50% women. All data obtained 
from participants is used for research purposes described below will be de-identified and separate from 
identifiable information in concordance with UCSD regulations. No data will be collected from their existing 
medical record or outside sources unless participants sign a release of information form.  
 
The schedule of study procedures and evaluations is illustrated in Table 3. Briefly, following a telephone 
screening visit that should take approximately 10 minutes to complete, eligible volunteers will be invited to 
participate in the informed consent process which varies in its delivery based on the Research Ramp-Up 
phase in place at the time of enrollment (see below). Once informed consent is obtained, a more elaborate, 
screening visit will determine their appropriateness for inclusion in the trial. Study assessment materials have 
been selected based on our prior work.  
 
With the exception of red phase, participants who have been telephone screened and determined eligible for 
the screening process will be invited to participate in the study. Following UCSD’s Research Ramp-Up phases 
of operation, participants will be screened and treated in accordance to the following protocols described 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 9 
below. All telephone or tele-video visits will be completed on a HIPAA compliant app called Doximity 
(https://www.doximity.com/about/research) 
 
 
 
Phase 1 (Red Phase): 
Screening Visit (Week -2). If the University reverts to the Red Phase again, potential participants will not be 
recruited, screened or enrolled. Participants who are currently enrolled in the study, however, will continue to 
be followed.   
 
Baseline Visit (Week 0). We will randomize already screened and consented participants remotely during this 
phase. Eligible participants will continue participation for a baseline evaluation that will take approximately 2-3 
hours by telephone (via HIPAA compliant Doximity). Although the method of administration varies by Research 
Ramp-Up phase (see below), the following standardized questionnaires will be collected for all phases of 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 10 
operation, at baseline and throughout the study: Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS; 31) to 
monitor symptoms of tobacco withdrawal; Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-Brief; 32) to 
measure cravings to smoke; the TLFB for Alcohol and Drug Use (33,24); the Nicotine Use Inventory (NUI; 
4, 27) is a brief questionnaire that has been used throughout the varenicline Phase III-IV trials that monitors 
smoking rates and probes for other forms of nicotine use including e-cigarettes, hookah, cigars, etc; the 
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; 35) is comprised of two separate 7-item self-report 
questions assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms, respectively; the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale 
(ASRM; 36) is a 5-item self-rating mania scale with a scoring range from 0-20 that assesses symptoms of 
mania and hypomania; the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; 37) is a semi-structured 
interview conducted by trained raters to monitor suicide ideation and behaviors; the Insomnia Severity Index 
(ISI; 38) is a reliable and valid 7-item self-report measure to evaluate perceived sleep difficulties; the 
Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS; 41) is a 27-item questionnaire measuring changes in acceptance-
based processes of smoking cessation based on this technique’s hypothesized mechanism of action; the 
Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Interview (NAEI) is a 25-item questionnaire that was used in EAGLES (4) 
and our prior work (27) to probe for neuropsychiatric complaints that might qualify as adverse events in a 
clinical trial; an Assessment of General AEs using standard operating procedures to record AEs according to 
the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 18.0 (MedDRA; 44) – derived preferred terms; and the 
Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12; 42) and Confidence to Quit Scale (43) measuring participants’ self-
efficacy and confidence to quit smoking. Study medication will be dispensed to participants by mail per VMRF 
pharmacy’s shipping protocol with instructions on its use.  Participants will also have their first session of ACT 
session (see below) at their week 0 baseline visit. All assessments will be performed by telephone (on HIPAA 
compliant Doximity) as scheduled with the exception of vitals, urine or blood collection, and exhaled CO which 
will not be collected during this Red phase.  
 
Treatment & Follow-up Visits (Weeks 1-12). Table 3 illustrates the schedule of assessments for all follow-up 
visits, which will be done by telephone via Doximity during this phase. On Day 8 (week 1) participants will pick 
a day between 8 and 35 to be their target quit date considering that one goal of the study is to have 
participants take varenicline for several weeks before trying to quit to maximize effectiveness. Study weeks 1, 
3, and 5 will take approximately 30 minutes to complete as participants will have 30-minute ACT sessions, as 
described below. Study weeks 2, 4, and 6 will take approximately 1 hour as participants will have ACT 
sessions and questionnaires to complete (see table 3). Study weeks 8, 10, and 12 will take 30-45 minutes to 
complete as participants will not have ACT on these visits but will complete questionnaires. Telephone visits 
for study weeks 7, 9, and 11 will take ~35 minutes, as the last ACT sessions will be completed during these 
visits. In addition to the questionnaires given at baseline described above the following questionnaires will be 
given during the treatment phase: the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire – 8 (CSQ-8; 39) is a standardized 
measure of treatment satisfaction that has been used widely across mental health services (40) and in 
smoking cessation research with varenicline preloading (18) and the ACT Treatment Satisfaction 
Questionnaire (ACT-TSQ) measures treatment satisfaction with ACT counseling using two force-choice 
response items and a Likert scale (9). 
 
Non-Treatment Follow-up Visits (weeks 13-24): Following discontinuation of the medication participants will 
be followed every 4 weeks until conclusion of the study assessing mood, any suicidal thinking, and nicotine or 
other drug use. Visits for study weeks 16, 20 and 24 will be done via Doximity and take approximately 30-45 
minutes.  
 
Phase 2 (Orange Phase): 
Screening Visit (Week -2). Prior to the screening visit, participants will be mailed or emailed a blank copy of 
the informed consent form. Potential participants will be consented by phone/video conferencing using 
Doximity to orient them to the study procedures and requirements. Participant’s decisional capacity will be 
assessed during consent by a trained research staff member to ensure they fully understand the study. After 
obtaining informed consent, participants will undergo a semi-structured clinical interview, the Mini-International 
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Version 7.0.2 for DSM-V (MINI; 28) administered by a trained research assistant. A 
standardized health assessment and mental status examination, including motivation to quit (29), will be 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 11 
performed by a medical staff by using Doximity. The only in-person procedures conducted during this phase 
will be for medical procedures. Specifically, a urine sample will be obtained for on-site urine toxicology, 
baseline cotinine level, and pregnancy screening. Expired breath CO will be measured and blood pressure 
and heart rate will be obtained along with height and body weight. Lastly, the Fagerström Test for Cigarette 
Dependence (FTCD; 30), a standardized self-report questionnaire will be used to measure nicotine 
dependence severity and the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) for Alcohol and Drug Use (33,24) which 
obtains estimates of daily drinking and drug use using a calendar technique will be used. The screening visit 
will take approximately 2-3 hours to complete in both its virtual and face-to-face forms and the latter will follow 
follow all guidelines to mitigate COVID-19 risk to participants and staff (see below).  
 
Baseline Visit (Week 0). Eligible participants will continue participation for a baseline evaluation that will take 
approximately 2-3 hours by Doximity. Separately, they will come to Pac-TARC in order to have two 4mL tubes 
of blood will be collected via venipuncture for use in determining the NMR outcome variable and as a backup 
sample stored at Pac-TARC and baseline blood pressure and heart rate will be measured. Similar to Phase 1, 
the following standardized questionnaires will be collected for all phases of operation, at baseline and 
throughout the study: Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS; 31); Questionnaire of Smoking 
Urges-Brief (QSU-Brief; 32); the TLFB for Alcohol and Drug Use (33,24); the Nicotine Use Inventory (NUI; 
4, 27); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; 35); the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale 
(ASRM; 36); the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; 37); the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; 
38); the Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS; 41); the Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Interview 
(NAEI); an Assessment of General AEs; and the Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12; 42) and 
Confidence to Quit Scale (43). Study medication will be dispensed to participants by mail per VMRF 
pharmacy’s shipping protocol with instructions on its use. Participants will also have their first session of ACT 
session (see below) at their week 0 baseline visit. All assessments will be performed by telephone (on HIPAA 
compliant Doximity) as scheduled with the exception of vitals, urine or blood collection, and exhaled CO.  
 
Treatment & Follow-up Visits (Weeks 1-12). Table 3 illustrates the schedule of assessments for all follow-up 
visits by telephone via Doximity. On Day 8 (week 1) participants will pick a day between 8 and 35 to be their 
target quit date considering that one goal of the study is to have participants take varenicline for several weeks 
before trying to quit to maximize effectiveness. Study weeks 1, 3, and 5 will take approximately 30 minutes to 
complete as participants will have 30-minute ACT sessions, as described below. Study weeks 2, 4, and 6 will 
take approximately 1 hour as participants will have ACT sessions and questionnaires to complete (see table 
3). Study weeks 8, 10, and 12 will take 30-45 minutes to complete as participants will not have ACT on these 
visits but will complete questionnaires. Telephone visits for study weeks 7, 9, and 11 will take ~35 minutes, as 
the last ACT sessions will be completed during these visits. In addition to the questionnaires given at baseline 
described above the following questionnaires will be given during the treatment phase: the Client Satisfaction 
Questionnaire – 8 (CSQ-8; 39) is a standardized measure of treatment satisfaction that has been used widely 
across mental health services (40) and in smoking cessation research with varenicline preloading (18) and the 
ACT Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ACT-TSQ) measures treatment satisfaction with ACT 
counseling using two force-choice response items and a Likert scale (9). 
 
Non-Treatment Follow-up Visits (weeks 13-24): Following discontinuation of the medication participants will 
be followed every 4 weeks until conclusion of the study assessing mood, any suicidal thinking, and nicotine or 
other drug use. Visits for study weeks 16, 20 and 24 will be done via Doximity and take approximately 30-45 
minutes.  
 
Phase 3 and 4 (Yellow and Green Phases). These phases will use our prior HRPP-approved methodologies 
involving both in-person and telephone appointments. The only difference will be that during the Yellow Phase 
the density of laboratory staff, PPE requirements, and social distancing will be strictly enforced as per the 
Research Ramp-Up guidelines. 
 
Screening Visit (Week -2). At screening, participants will arrive at Pac-TARC and be consented to study 
procedures. Participant’s decisional capacity will be assessed during consent by a trained research staff 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 12 
member to ensure they fully understand the study. After consenting, participants will undergo a semi-
structured clinical interview, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Inventory Version 7.0.2 for DSM-V (MINI; 
28) administered by a trained research assistant. A standardized health assessment and mental status 
examination, including motivation to quit (29), will be performed by a medical staff member and a urine sample 
will be obtained for on-site urine toxicology, baseline cotinine level, and pregnancy screening. Expired breath 
CO will be measured and blood pressure and heart rate will be obtained along with height and body weight. 
Lastly, the Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence (FTCD; 30), a standardized self-report questionnaire 
will be used to measure nicotine dependence severity and the TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) for Alcohol 
and Drug Use (33,24) which obtains estimates of daily drinking and drug use using a calendar technique will 
be used. The screening visit will take approximately 2-3 hours to complete.  
 
Baseline Visit (Week 0). Eligible participants will return to Pac-TARC following screening for a baseline 
evaluation that will take approximately 2-3 hours. First, two 4mL tubes of blood will be collected via 
venipuncture for use in determining the NMR outcome variable and as a backup sample stored at Pac-TARC 
and baseline blood pressure and heart rate will be measured. Next, the following standardized questionnaires 
will be collected at baseline and throughout the study: Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS; 31) to 
monitor symptoms of tobacco withdrawal; Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-Brief; 32) to 
measure cravings to smoke; the TLFB for Alcohol and Drug Use (33,24); the Nicotine Use Inventory (NUI; 
4, 27) is a brief questionnaire that has been used throughout the varenicline Phase III-IV trials that monitors 
smoking rates and probes for other forms of nicotine use including e-cigarettes, hookah, cigars, etc; the 
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; 35) is comprised of two separate 7-item self-report 
questions assessing anxiety and depressive symptoms, respectively; the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale 
(ASRM; 36) is a 5-item self-rating mania scale with a scoring range from 0-20 that assesses symptoms of 
mania and hypomania; the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; 37) is a semi-structured 
interview conducted by trained raters to monitor suicide ideation and behaviors; the Insomnia Severity Index 
(ISI; 38) is a reliable and valid 7-item self-report measure to evaluate perceived sleep difficulties; the 
Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS; 41) is a 27-item questionnaire measuring changes in acceptance-
based processes of smoking cessation based on this technique’s hypothesized mechanism of action; the 
Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Interview (NAEI) is a 25-item questionnaire that was used in EAGLES (4) 
and our prior work (27) to probe for neuropsychiatric complaints that might qualify as adverse events in a 
clinical trial; an Assessment of General AEs using standard operating procedures to record AEs according to 
the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 18.0 (MedDRA; 44) – derived preferred terms; and the 
Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12; 42) and Confidence to Quit Scale (43) measuring participants’ self-
efficacy and confidence to quit smoking. Participants will also have their first session of ACT session (see 
below) at their week 0 baseline visit. 
 
Treatment Follow-up Visits (Weeks 1-12). Table 3 illustrates the schedule of assessments for treatment 
follow-up visits. On Day 8 (week 1) participants will pick a day between 8 and 35 to be their target quit date 
considering that one goal of the study is to have participants take varenicline for several weeks before trying to 
quit to maximize effectiveness. In-person visits for study weeks 1, 3, and 5 will take approximately 30 minutes 
to complete as participants will have 30-minute ACT sessions, as described below. In-person visits for study 
weeks 2, 4, and 6 will take approximately 1 hour as participants will have ACT sessions, assessment of blood 
pressure and heart rate, and questionnaires to complete (see table 3). In-person visits for study weeks 8, 10, 
and 12 will take 30 minutes to complete as participants will not have ACT on these visits but will fill out 
questionnaires and have blood pressure/heart rate assessed. Telephone visits for study weeks 7, 9, and 11 
will take ~35 minutes, as the last ACT sessions will be completed at these visits. Figure 3 illustrates the study 
design. In addition to the questionnaires given at baseline described above the following questionnaires will be 
given during the treatment phase: the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire – 8 (CSQ-8; 39) is a standardized 
measure of treatment satisfaction that has been used widely across mental health services (40) and in 
smoking cessation research with varenicline preloading (18) and the ACT Treatment Satisfaction 
Questionnaire (ACT-TSQ) measures treatment satisfaction with ACT counseling using two force-choice 
response items and a Likert scale (9). 
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 13 
Brief description of ACT intervention: Previous work has demonstrated that ACT, delivered as either 10 in-
person or 6 telephone-delivered sessions, was feasible as evidenced by very high rates of participant retention 
and satisfaction (9). Others have also found preliminary evidence for ACT facilitating abstinence when 
combined with NRT patches: 40% of bipolar smokers receiving face-to-face ACT therapy, and 33% of those 
receiving ACT telephone therapy, achieved 7-day PP abstinence. Notably, higher quit rates were observed in 
ACT-treated bipolar smokers compared with another cohort treated with mood management cognitive 
behavioral therapy (46). Further, there was face validity to the proposed mechanism of action of ACT with 
>50% of participants reporting increasing acceptance of cravings to smoke. When one considers that 7-day 
PPA rates at end of treatment in EAGLES bipolar smokers treated with NRT patch was 10.8%, and for SSD 
smokers was 15.2% (unpublished data), the potential 2 to 4-fold booster effects with ACT deserve further 
testing. The ACT treatment manual to be used in this pilot trial was developed by Dr. Heffner and colleagues 
and was pilot tested in smokers with BD (9). The ten 30-minute sessions will target the six core processes in 
ACT: acceptance, cognitive diffusion, being present, self as context, defining valued directions, and committed 
action. The intervention relies heavily on experiential in-session exercises and metaphors as a means of 
helping smokers learn to apply ACT principles to the task of quitting smoking as well as managing negative 
affect. ACT counselors will have at least three years of counseling experience, established therapeutic skills 
(e.g., empathy), and a master’s degree in clinical psychology. Counselors will receive 40 hours of didactic and 
role-play training in the ACT intervention provided by Dr. Heffner prior to the study commencing. Counselors 
will be certified as study therapists prior to delivering ACT, defined as passing scores on fidelity measures as 
outlined in the ACT Adherence Raters’ Manual (47). ACT treatment fidelity will be evaluated by Dr. Afari 
assessing a twenty percent random sample of each therapist’s audiotaped calls. ACT sessions will be rated 
using the ACT Adherence Raters’ Manual (47,48). Dr. McKenna and the counselors will also meet biweekly to 
review implementation quality data and coordinate intervention delivery based on fidelity feedback he receives 
from Dr. Afari.  
 
Non-Treatment Follow-up Visits (weeks 13-24): Following discontinuation of the medication participants will 
be followed every 4 weeks until conclusion of the study assessing mood, any suicidal thinking, and nicotine or 
other drug use. Visits for study weeks 16 and 20 will be done via telephone and take approximately 30-45 
minutes. The final visit at week 24 will take place at Pac-TAC and take approximately 1 hour to complete.  
 
Medication Adherence: Although aware of their limitations, due to budgetary constraints we will use 
participant self-report and pill counts of capsules returned at the biweekly visits as the measure of study 
medication adherence. Compliance will be defined as having any (partial or full) daily dose of study drug for 
80% of the planned treatment period of 84 days.  
 
Medication Tolerability Outcome Measure - - We will also assess: 1) % participants in each dosing arm who 
tolerate twice daily dosing with no dosage reductions; 2) % participants in each arm who continue on treatment 
but with a dosage reduction to once daily dosing; 3) % participants who discontinue medication treatment, but 
continue in study (off treatment/in study; treatment discontinuation rate); and 4) % participants who discontinue 
treatment and study enrollment (e.g., study discontinuation rate).  
 
Assessment of NPSAEs & 2° NPS safety outcome: We will use the identical procedures we helped develop 
and used in the EAGLES trial to monitor neuropsychiatric safety (7). Briefly, all NPS complaints that are 
volunteered, observed or solicited with the NAEI; any elevated scores on the mood-, sleep- and suicidality-
related measures described above, and any proxy reports from collateral informants will be evaluated as 
potential NPSAEs by the study team. Each AE will be rated by one of the study clinicians as to its intensity 
using the standardized EAGLES procedure: Mild = no or minimal interference in functioning; Moderate = some 
interference in functioning; Severe = significant interference with functioning. Based on this scoring, we will 
determine the composite safety endpoint used in EAGLES (i.e., NPSAEs that were rated as moderate to 
severe across the 16 pre-specified domains). We will also examine the observed incidence of participants 
experiencing NPSAEs of any intensity (i.e., mild, moderate or severe) as our 2° NPS safety outcome during 
the 12-week active treatment phase plus 28 day as also done in EAGLES.  
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 14 
2° Efficacy Outcome: In keeping with the pilot nature of this trial, we will use 7-day point prevalence 
abstinence (PPA) at week 12 confirmed by expired CO levels ≥ 4 ppm and urine cotinine levels < 200 mg/ml 
as the secondary efficacy endpoint. We will continue to track smoking outcomes through week 24 using these 
same biochemical verification measures to assess 7-day PPA at week 24 as a tertiary outcome.  
Other Secondary Outcome Measures: Our gathering of data on the MNWS, QSU-Brief, ISI, SEQ-12, 
Confidence to Quit Scale is exploratory in nature and is intended to provide preliminary information on the 
mechanism of action of combined varenicline and ACT in SMI smokers and their relation to NPSAEs. We will 
also explore ACT’s effects on avoidance and inflexibility with the AIS at weeks 12 and 24.  
 
Determination of the NMR: The ratio of trans-3'-hydroxycotinine (3HC) and cotinine (COT) will be measured 
in plasma using electrospray ionization liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ESI LC-MS/MS) 
technology adapted from the protocols described by Tanner et al. (45) and Lerman et al. (7). COT and 3HC in 
plasma will be determined by quantifying with standard deuterium labeled COT and 3HC, known as COT-d3 
and 3HC-d3 (commercially available from Sigma-Aldrich). Plasma samples will be spiked with a known 
amount of COT-d3 and 3HC-d3, and samples will be subjected to MS to quantitate the endogenous levels of 
COT and 3HC by parallel reaction monitoring. LC-MS/MS will be performed on the high-resolution Orbitrap Q-
Exactive LC -MS system located in the Hook lab in the Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical 
Sciences. Standard plots of different amounts of deuterated and non-deuterated COT and 3HC standards into 
control plasma, followed by LC-MS/MS, will define the linear range of quantitative measurements, lower limit of 
detection, and reproducibility of replicate samples. Ratios of 3HC/COT will be calculated from quantitative MS 
data analyzed by the Skyline software. Reliability of these procedures in plasma is high with NMR 
measurements robust even to differences in analytic methods used by different laboratories (45). The NMR 
data will be compiled with the phenotypic data of this study to examine the relationship of NMR to NPSAEs 
and smoking cessation.  
 
Data Storage: Data from assessments will be collected solely for research purposes by self-report, interview, 
urinalysis, and venipuncture and de-identified with an alpha-numeric code. The link between Urine will be 
immediately processed upon collection and then disposed of in accordance with UCSD policies. Blood data 
collected at baseline will be de-identified and stored in a -800 C freezer within Pac-TARC until transferred and 
processed by Dr. Hook in her laboratory to calculate the nicotine metabolite ratio. 
 
Data Analytic Plan -- Aim 1: Examine the feasibility of combining ACT with two different varenicline-assisted 
quitting strategies using a flexible quit date in SMI smokers. Three feasibility domains will be examined across 
hypotheses assessing demand, practicality, and acceptability (18).  
     Hypothesis 1a posits that there will be demand for such a combined pharmacological-behavioral trial 
among SMI smokers as evidenced by achieving a) targeted accrual rates (average of 6 participants screened 
& 4 randomized per month), and b) recruitment costs not exceeding the advertising budget (~$200 per 
screened subject).  
     Hypothesis 1b assessing practicality posits that the piloted elements of the study will be successfully 
carried out as defined by ≥ 80% retention of participants and completion of study procedures during a) the 12-
week active treatment phase, and b) 12-week follow-up period. We also predict that ≥ 80% of ACT sessions 
will be completed with no drop-off across in-person and telephone counseling sessions.  
     Hypothesis 1c predicts that acceptability of the flexible quit date and varenicline dosing procedures will be 
high as demonstrated by ≥ 80% adherence to a) making a quit attempt within the 27-day quit window, and b) 
taking at least 80% of the prescribed study medication doses. Furthermore, we posit that satisfaction with the 
trial overall will be high with scores on the CSQ-8 registering in the 24-32 range, as will satisfaction with ACT 
counseling as demonstrated by ≥ 80% of participants endorsing scores in the satisfactory to highly satisfactory 
range on the 2-item ACT-Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire used in our prior work (9).  
 
For each feasibility measure we will compare study values to the targeted benchmarks which are based on our 
prior work in SMI smokers (4,49) and the relevant literature (13,19). While formal hypothesis testing is not 
planned given the pilot nature of this proposal (50,51), we will calculate effect sizes (i.e., Cohen’s d or odds 
ratios [ORs]) and standard deviations, as well as confidence intervals (CI), for our feasibility variables and use 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 15 
them as preliminary data for the subsequent larger RCTs. We will also calculate and examine Cohen’s kappa 
coefficients for our clinician-obtained measures including the MINI, TLFB, C-SSRS, and assessments of 
NPSAEs and general AEs. These values will be used to assess the inter-rater reliability of relevant measures 
in SMI smokers and to refine our rater training procedures if necessary.  
Aim 2: Explore whether nicotine clearance rate as measured by the NMR influences the incidence of NPSAEs 
in varenicline-treated SMI smokers. This exploratory aim will begin to test the hypothesis that incidence of 
NPSAEs of any severity will be higher in slow nicotine metabolisers assigned to standard dose varenicline 
compared with normal metabolisers treated with low dose varenicline.  
 
To gather preliminary data on the NMR, the frequency distributions of the NMR values in this SMI sample will 
be compared with the published data from Lerman et al. (2015) in a large sample of NMI smokers that found a 
cutoff score of 0.31 as the demarcating point between slow (<0.31) and normal (including rapid) metabolisers. 
Based on this analysis, we will calculate Cohen’s d effect sizes comparing slow metabolisers on standard dose 
vs. normal metabolisers on low dose, as well as standard deviations and CIs, for incidence of NPSAEs of any 
severity to examine the direction and magnitude of the effect. Secondary outcome measures will also be 
examined using the same methodologies including 7-day PPA at weeks 12 and 24, to guide future studies. 
Regarding the secondary efficacy outcomes, and anticipating possible quit-boosting effects from ACT and 
varenicline preloading, we predict 7-day PPA rates at week 12 will be at least comparable to those observed in 
varenicline-treated EAGLES SMI participants which was 28.2%, and that 7-day PPA rates at week 24 will be 
at least comparable to the 20.0% observed in EAGLES (unpublished data). To examine the possible 
confounding effect of variable lengths of abstinence depending on when participants first attempt to quit 
smoking within the quit window, we will examine the effect of a time factor (i.e., the number of days from the 
first dose of medication to the date of the first quit attempt) with the methodologies described above.  
 
Sample Size Determination: The aims of this pilot trial are to gather preliminary data or demonstrate proof of 
principle with potential for high impact within one or more stated research priorities of the funding agency. 
Thus, Aim 1 of the proposal addresses feasibility while Aim 2 is exploratory and begins to test the principle as 
to whether NMR influences NPSAE propensity and medication tolerability in SMI smokers by estimating effect 
sizes. The study is designed to provide preliminary data on the feasibility of a larger RCT that would further 
develop these novel pharmacotherapy approaches in SMI smokers. It is not powered to test clinical outcomes, 
thus, safety (incidence of NPSAEs) and efficacy (7-day PPA at week 12 and at week 24) outcome measures 
are considered secondary endpoints. In our group’s previous work with varenicline in EAGLES (4) and another 
trial done in SMI smokers (49), we randomized ~80% of those screened and retained >80% of study 
participants. Similar retention rates were found in another pilot trial of varenicline in bipolar smokers (52) and 
in Dr. Heffner’s preliminary study. Therefore, we expect that with N=60 we will be able to adequately 
determine the feasibility of the proposed study procedures.  
 
Consistent with recommendations on the proper sizing for pilot studies literature (50,51,53), we chose a 
sample size of 60 participants based on maximal accrual expectations over a 15-month recruitment period and 
practical cost constraints to conduct a pilot trial in this special population of smokers. Previous studies 
examining target sample sizes for pilot studies have argued that as few as 12 participants per group is 
adequate to estimate standard deviations for a two-group study (54,55), while others have suggested that a 
total sample of 30 is an acceptable size for a pilot study (56). With a sample of 60 (n=30 per dosing group), we 
will have the ability to estimate effect sizes, standard deviations, and their CIs with adequate precision to 
evaluate the feasibility of study procedures and to subsequently conduct formal power analyses for future 
RCTs (57). As such, it is amply sized as a pilot trial. For example, given a small-to-medium estimated effect of 
d=0.40, we would have 80% confidence that the true effect fell between 0.064 and 0.733 with a pilot sample of 
N=60. For a smaller effect of d=0.30, this 80% CI becomes 0.005-0.672 providing adequate precision in 
detecting an effect (i.e., zero not in the CI) for use in power analyses for a larger RCT. Furthermore, applying 
Sims’ and Lewis’ (2012) calculations, the sample size of N=60 will allow us to estimate standard deviations 
around our feasibility estimates with a minimal inflation factor (e.g., 1.09 for one-sided 80% CIs) for use in 
future RCT power analyses.  
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 16 
10.
HUMAN SUBJECTS 
Sixty men and women with DSM-V BD (Type I or Type II, N = 30) or SSD (schizophrenia or schizoaffective 
disorder, N = 30) and who are chronic smokers will be recruited to participate in this pilot trial at Pac-TARC, 
which is a research center housed within the UCSD Department of Psychiatry. With an anticipated 33% screen 
failure rate, we anticipate screening up to 90 participants to accrue the sample. Each group will include ~ 50% 
women and individuals of any ethnic background are eligible to participate. Based on our prior work recruiting 
for EAGLES in San Diego where 35% (182/523) of those phone-screened self-identified as BD or SSD 
smokers, we expect that the SMI smokers who call to inquire about the study will have demographic and 
clinical characteristics similar to those SMI smokers enrolled in EAGLES (e.g., ~47% female, 65% White). 
Also, like EAGLES, we expect BD and SSD smokers to have similar baseline smoking characteristics.  
 
Inclusion Criteria 
 
18-70 years of age 
 
Outpatients with a DSM-V diagnosis of BD or SSD 
 
Smoke at least 10 cigarettes per day and have an expired carbon monoxide (CO) breathalyzer of ≥ 10 
ppm at screening and baseline visits 
 
Are motivated to quit smoking by scoring 5 or higher on the Contemplation Ladder (28)  
 
Have access to a mental health provider should their condition worsen during study enrollment 
 
Exclusion Criteria 
 
Females who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating 
 
Test positive for any non-prescribed medications (e.g., opiates, benzodiazepines, psychostimulants) or 
illicit drugs excluding cannabis during screening 
 
Have made a suicide attempt or engaged in self-mutilatory behavior in the past year 
 
Meet criteria for another SUD in the past month  
 
In the investigators’ judgement, are either psychiatrically (e.g., presently manic, hypomanic, acutely 
psychotic, depressed or suicidal) or medically (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, angina) unstable to 
safely participate 
 
Are currently using any other form of treatment for smoking cessation 
 
11.
RECRUITMENT AND PROCEDURES PREPARATORY TO RESEARCH
Outpatients who are interested in treatment for smoking cessation will be recruited from the UCSD Outpatient 
Psychiatry Clinics in La Jolla and Hillcrest, the VA San Diego Mental Health Care Line including its Mood 
Clinic (where Dr. McKenna is a Staff Psychologist), and the general San Diego community with help from local 
mental illness support groups including the National Alliance on Mental Illness and Depression and Bipolar 
Support Alliance. We will also utilize print, on-line, and radio ads for recruitment. We will not review potential 
participant’s private health information in recruitment and/or identifying participants to contact. As an example 
of our capabilities to recruit such smokers, 231 SMI patients have been screened in previous smoking 
cessation studies at Pac-TARC.  
  
 
When interested candidates call study staff in response to recruitment materials, confidentiality will be 
reviewed briefly and verbal consent will be requested and documented by the staff member prior to asking 
screening questions. Protected Health Information will be collected during this screening process, which 
includes name, address, date of birth and some psychiatric and medical history. This information is collected 
to assess for study eligibility and will be accessed by only the study staff members with appropriate training. 
This prescreening stage of research presents no more than minimal risk of harm to the subjects and involves 
no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside of the research context. All participants 
will be provided ample information verbally to allow them to make an informed decision regarding whether to 
participate in the telephone screen, and eligible participants interested in the study will review a thorough 
written informed consent form with study staff at their first face-to-face clinic visit. To protect identifiers from 
improper use and disclosure, all telephone pre-screen forms will be filed in a locked cabinet in a secured file 
room. The reason these pre-screening forms will be retained is so they can be cross-referenced across our 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 17 
studies to prevent duplicate screenings or concurrent enrollment. In addition, these forms are kept on file for 
those who have expressed interest in future studies. 
 
12.
INFORMED CONSENT 
At the screening visit at the Pac-TARC facility a study staff member designated to obtain informed consent will 
provide an explanation of the study purpose and requirements (in English). This staff member will have 
completed appropriate training in Human Subjects Protection and Good Clinical Practice, have specific training 
regarding recruitment, screening and assessment for the current study, and will be supervised by Drs. 
Anthenelli and McKenna. The investigators ensure that each study subject, or his/her legally acceptable 
representative, is fully informed about the nature and objectives of the study and possible risks associated with 
participation. The informed consent form will be in compliance with UCSD HRPP, local regulatory 
requirements, and legal requirements. The informed consent form used in this study, and any changes made 
during the course of the study, will be prospectively approved by the UCSD HRPP before use. Written 
informed consent will be obtained from each subject or the subject's legally acceptable representative before 
any study-specific activity is performed. We will retain the original of each subject's signed consent form and 
authorization. Staff will also review the approved HIPAA Research Authorization form and answer any 
questions subjects may have regarding HIPAA and use of their data in this study. If still interested after 
receiving an explanation of the study, the candidate will be given an opportunity to review, inquire about, and 
sign the study informed consent form approved by the UCSD’s HRPP, and the HIPAA Research Authorization 
form “University of California Permission to Use Personal Health Information for Research” and given the 
“SUBJECT’S BILL OF RIGHTS” as required by California State law.  
 
Subjects will be given a copy of the signed informed consent, HIPAA Research Authorization form, UCSD’s 
Experimental Subjects Bill of Rights and the Registry Authorization Informed Consent for their own records 
and study staff will retain the originals. These documents will be filed in a locked cabinet, in a locked office that 
only authorized study staff can access. This location will be separate from all de-identified data collected to 
reduce risks to participant confidentiality. 
 
13.
ALTERNATIVES TO STUDY PARTICIPATION 
Participants do not have to be in this study to receive treatment for their smoking habit. Instead of taking part 
in this study, they may choose to receive treatment with medications that have been approved for use in this 
country or they may choose non-drug therapies. If a participant would like referrals or does not want to 
continue in the study, the following is a list of alternative treatments that would be recommended after talking 
with one of the study doctors. The study doctor will discuss the risks and benefits of the alternative treatments 
including: Nicotine gum, Nicotine patch, Nicotine inhaler, Nicotine spray, Nicotine lozenge, Bupropion, 
Hypnosis, “Cold turkey”, and Counseling/Self-help other than ACT. 
 
14.
POTENTIAL RISKS 
The inherent risks in randomization by chance to low (0.5 mg twice daily with slower titration over one full 
week) versus standard dose (1.0 mg twice daily with standard titration) varenicline will be explained to 
participants during the consenting process. The risk of the lower 0.5 mg dose twice daily is minimal given the 
previous studies described in the Background section; in fact, fewer side effects have been associated with the 
lower dose. Specifically, our earliest work with varenicline in a Phase II trial in NMI smokers found that 0.5 mg 
twice daily titrated varenicline - - one-half of what eventually became the FDA-approved titrated dose of 1 mg 
twice daily, produced similar quit rates to the approved dose (13), a result confirmed in a related Phase II 
varenicline trial (14) and a recent Phase IV trial (15). Furthermore, all participants will receive ACT in helping 
them quit smoking.  
 
 
Potential risks for varenicline tartrate: 
The negative events that are the most likely to happen when receiving varenicline in this study are nausea, 
headaches, sleep disturbances (insomnia, abnormal dreams), dizziness, constipation, flatulence (gas) and 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 18 
vomiting. Even though these side effects are expected to occur in some people, most have not had to 
discontinue varenicline treatment because of side effects. Varenicline is an FDA-approved medication or the 
treatment of smoking cessation. To date, over 24 million people worldwide have been exposed to varenicline. 
 
The following adverse events have been reported after varenicline came on the market. Because these events 
are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their 
frequency or know whether the drug actually causes these events. 
 
Less Common 
Changes in mood (depression and mania), agitation, psychosis, hallucinations, paranoia, delusions, homicidal 
ideation, hostility, changes in behavior, anxiety, panic, and suicidal ideation. 
 
Rare (but serious) 
Hypersensitivity reactions (swelling of face, mouth, extremities, and neck that can make breathing difficult) and 
skin reactions (rash, swelling, redness, and peeling of the skin which can sometimes be life-threatening) 
 
Smoking cessation with or without treatment is associated with nicotine withdrawal symptoms and the 
exacerbation of underlying psychiatric illness. Not all patients reporting these events had prior psychiatric 
illnesses and not all had stopped smoking. The role of varenicline in these reports is not known. 
 
Other Study Risks and Discomforts: 
 
In September 2021, Pfizer – the maker of varenicline (Chantix), began a voluntary recall of this medication. This was done 
because some lots or batches of the medication contained too high of a level of a substance called “N-nitroso-varenicline.”
 
According to the drug maker, “long-term ingestion of N-nitroso-varenicline may be associated with a theoretical potential 
increased cancer risk in humans, but there is no immediate risk to patients taking this medication.” According to both the 
drug maker and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): “The health benefits of stopping smoking outweigh the 
cancer risk from the nitrosamine impurity in varenicline.” 
 
As a result of the Pfizer drug recall, in this amended study protocol, participants will be informed as part of the consent 
process that they will receive a generic version of the medication that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has 
allowed to be temporarily imported into the U.S.  That generic medication, named Apo-Varenicline, contains n-nitroso-
varenicline amounts at a level deemed acceptable by the FDA. Apo-varenicline is approved for use as a generic 
medication for smoking cessation in Canada. 
 
The researchers are in communication with Pfizer about this development and are tracking the FDA guidance on n-
nitroso varenicline. They will not knowingly dispense any medications that contain levels of this impurity that are above 
the FDA’s acceptable levels. However, if potential participants still have concerns about this newly identified potential 
safety risk, they will be told to speak with Dr. Anthenelli and/or their own healthcare provider about alternate approaches 
to quitting smoking. 
 
Additional Study Risks and Discomforts include: 
1.   Pain, bleeding, bruising or swelling at the site of needle sticks (where the needle is inserted to draw blood) 
which is sometimes likely and not serious in our experience.  
2. Lightheadedness and fainting during needle sticks which is not likely nor serious in our experience. 
3. Distress due to the personal nature of questions asked in the context of completing the diagnostic 
interview and clinical rating scales which is not likely nor serious in our experience. 
4. Distress due to the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) which is not likely nor serious in our 
experience. 
5. As always in research settings, there is the remote possibility of a breach of confidentiality due to 
disclosure of personal information which might embarrass or negatively impact the participant’s mental illness. 
15. RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND ADEQUACY OF RESOURCES 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 19 
The basic protection against risk in this study is the standardization of assessment that will be provided by the 
study. The study investigators, study coordinator, study staff, and data manager will meet weekly to review 
accrued data, data confidentiality, recruitment, and subject complaints. Assessment of changes to the 
risk/benefit ratio, and subject complaints will be reviewed by the principal investigators and reported to the 
HRPP in accordance with HRPP reporting guidelines. Minutes derived from these meetings will be submitted 
to the IRB annually. Strict confidentiality will be maintained. Code numbers will identify all subjects, and their 
research records will be kept in a locked file. No participant will be identified by any published report. Data will 
be entered by staff who are authorized by the principal investigator to do this, and they will abide by 
confidentiality regulations of the HRPP. These data will be secured for minimal access to authorized personnel 
associated with the study. Subject anonymity will be preserved by the use of a code number on all 
questionnaires and reports. A list of subject names will be kept in a locked file cabinet with minimal access to 
the study personnel authorized by the principal investigator. We do not expect any breach of confidentiality; 
however, if one occurs, it will be reviewed and reported to the HRPP. In the event of a breach of confidential 
information, attempts will be made to limit the spread of the information, identify the nature of the information 
and any specific risks its propagation may convey, and to contact the HRPP for further guidance in 
determining whether the affected individual should be contacted regarding the breach.  
 
During the course of the study, safety data will be collected for all subjects who have enrolled into the study. 
Participants will receive an Emergency Contact Information card in case they need to reach study doctors 
outside the working day. The incidence and severity of treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) will be 
assessed at each in-person and telephone visit by trained study staff members. Further, the Neuropsychiatric 
Adverse Event Interview (NAEI) will be conducted at each in-person visit by a trained interviewer, which will 
also assess changes in psychiatric symptoms. The professional, experienced staff members conducting the 
clinical assessments and venipuncture will be sensitive to any patient discomfort and will make every effort to 
minimize aggravation by taking breaks or discontinuing the assessment if necessary. Similarly, trained 
therapists delivering ACT will discuss any study issues as they arise with participants as part of the therapy. 
Participants may withdraw from the study at any time at their own request, or they may be withdrawn at any 
time at the discretion of the investigators for safety, behavioral, or administrative reasons. If a subject does not 
return for a scheduled visit, every effort will be made to contact the participant. In any circumstance, every 
effort will be made to document the outcome, if possible. The principal investigator will inquire about the 
reason for withdrawal, request that the participant return for a final visit, if applicable, and follow-up with the 
participant regarding any unresolved AEs. On the day of randomization, participants are given an emergency 
notification card. The emergency notification card has a 24-hour emergency number by which to contact a 
clinical study staff member in case of an after-hours emergency. Participants who discontinue treatment will be 
encouraged to continue participation in the study and all planned assessments/evaluations. Specifically, they 
will maintain the visit schedule and should continue participation through the non-treatment follow-up phase of 
the study. All participants who permanently discontinue study drugs for any reason will remain in the study as 
Off Treatment and In Study (OTIS). Every effort will be made to keep the subject in the study until the final visit 
and all planned assessments/evaluations should be performed. Specifically, the subject will maintain the visit 
schedule and continue participation through the non-treatment follow-up phase of the study. 
 
If a participant is identified as suicidal or at risk of harming themselves via self-report or on the C-SSRS one of 
the study’s licensed clinicians (M.D. or Ph.D.) will evaluate the participant in more detail for assessment of 
suicidal ideation, plans, and intent. As part of this evaluation, a safety plan will be established and 
documented, and the necessary referrals will be made for mental health care including contacting the 
participant’s usual mental health provider or family member and, if necessary, referring for emergency 
psychiatric evaluation at a hospital emergency department. If the participant is an imminent threat to 
themselves as determined by a licensed provider, confidentiality will be broken to ensure the safety of the 
participant in compliance with California State Laws. Pac-TARC is located approximately 2 miles from three 
major hospitals. 
 
A Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) has also been established for this study. They will receive 
aggregated safety reports on a semi-annual basis that includes unblinding codes from the research 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 20 
pharmacist. This board will be co-chaired by two independent individuals who are not part of the treatment 
providing team: Arthur Brody, M.D. (a professor and addiction psychiatrist working at the Veterans Affairs San 
Diego Healthcare System) and Timothy Chen, Pharm.D., BCACP, BCGP, APh (Director, Tobacco Cessation 
Clinical Resource Center, VHA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention).   
 
COVID-19 Risk Management Plans: For all on-site, in-person visits we will be follow UCSD guidelines and 
health and safety protocols as outlined in the UC San Diego Research Ramp Up Guidelines 
(https://blink.ucsd.edu/research/covid-19/research-ramp-up.html) including the use of personalized protective 
equipment (PPE), social distancing, and sanitization. Standard operating procedures in place at Pac-TARC 
are outlined below: 
 
1. SAFETY 
1.1. 
PPE including masks must be worn by all staff, visitors, and participants. 
1.2. 
Staff members are limited to only those who are required to be present for the visit. 
1.3. 
Only one visit will be scheduled at any one time allowing 15 minutes between participants or visitors 
to allow for proper sanitization. 
1.4. 
Hand washing for 20 seconds or longer will be required prior and following visits. 
1.5. 
If gloves are worn, they are to be changed between tasks. 
1.6. 
Each participant will be assigned a clinic room at scheduling and documented. 
1.7. 
Participants are asked to arrive at the clinic unaccompanied unless absolutely necessary (e.g., 
disabled and requires assistance). 
1.8. 
Clinic room(s) used for participant visits will be thoroughly wiped down with University provided 
disinfectant prior to and between all visits. 
1.9. 
Staff, visitors and participants will be instructed to utilize hand sanitizer prior to entering clinic rooms. 
1.10. Staff will self-monitor on a daily basis, per University guidelines, for COVID-19 symptoms including 
using the online tool https://blinkucsd.edu/go/screening. 
1.11. All personnel will be instructed not to come to work if sick. 
1.12. Participants will be questioned the day prior to scheduled visits by phone and on the day of 
scheduled visits utilizing the University’s Patient and Visitor Screening Questions form. 
1.13. Signage indicating max occupancy limits, social distancing requirements, safety procedures and 
disinfection protocols will be visible in all offices, clinic rooms, waiting areas and laboratory spaces. 
1.14. Tape and placards will be placed to encourage physical distancing. 
1.15. All personnel capable of working remotely will be directed to do so. 
1.16. Personnel shifts will be staggered to reduce in-person contact. 
1.17. Laboratory supplies will be accessible in each clinic room and be cleaned following every visit. 
1.18. Personnel are prevented from sharing items when applicable (e.g., pens, phones, desks, 
workstations) or disinfected between each use. 
1.19. Hand sanitizers will be kept at workstations and high-touch areas. 
1.20. All personnel will be responsible for their workstations and must clean their workstation following a 
shift. 
1.21. Assigned personnel will disinfect common areas (including doorknobs, light switches, pens, waiting 
area), high-touch areas (doorknobs, light switches), between visitors and participants or at the 
beginning and end of each day.  
1.22. A two-week supply of PPE and disinfectants will be kept on hand in the facility. 
 
2. RISK 
2.1. Using UCSD’s Important Information about COVID-19 and Research Participation form, participants 
will be informed as part of the informed consent process of their risk of exposure to the COVID-19 
virus may be higher by participating in any in-person clinic visit. 
2.2. Participants will be questioned a day prior to scheduled visit by phone and on the day of scheduled 
visit utilizing the University’s Patient and Visitor Screening Questions form. 
2.3. Documentation will be filed with the participant’s source records. 
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 21 
 
3. SANITIZATION 
3.1. Signage indicating disinfection protocols will be visible in all offices, clinic rooms, waiting areas and 
laboratory spaces. 
3.2. Sanitizing must occur after each participant visit 
3.3. Hand washing for 20 seconds or longer will be required prior, following visits and after sanitizing. 
3.4. If gloves are worn, they are to be changed between tasks. 
3.5. Disinfectant and cleaners used will be approved by the EPA. 
3.6. When disinfecting, cleanser will be kept on the surface to be sanitized for the directed amount of time 
by the manufacturer. 
3.7. PPE will be worn while sanitizing. 
3.8. Gloves must be discarded after cleaning to prevent cross contamination. 
3.9. Disposing of biohazards will be in accordance with the EH & S guidelines. 
 
 
16. PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY CONSIDERATIONS INCLUDING DATA ACCESS AND 
MANAGEMENT 
The following steps have been taken to ensure the protection of confidential patient information: 1) All data 
collected from subjects (i.e., biological and behavioral) will be numerically coded using a system that will not 
be decipherable based on personal information, including date of assessment, birthday etc., 2) No mechanism 
for deciphering the coded participant information will be readily accessible in the context of the proposed work, 
3) All requests for access to participant information are subject to review according to HRPP-approved written 
policies, 4) All researchers involved with handling of samples from participants will be required to receive 
training in ethical principles, information security and appropriate handling of human subject information, 5) 
Hard copies of data will be stored exclusively in a secure records room within Pac-TARC, in a locked room. 
Electronic data will be stored on a secure computer with password access required for viewing in accordance 
with UCSD regulations on data security, 6) No identifiable participant data will be included on any shared data, 
and the release of all data for sharing will be authorized by local officials in accordance with UCSD policies 
prior to release, 7) Consent and other forms containing identifying data will be kept separate from other 
research data, and 8) One key hard document connecting the names with the codes will be maintained and 
kept by the applicant in a separate location than the data under lock and key. 
 
Efforts will be made to protect Participant’s privacy. Recruitment will happen via potential participants receiving 
HRPP-approved recruitment materials from their clinic providers or seeing the materials on their own and 
calling Pac-TARC. All in-person procedures, including consent, assessments, and ACT will be done in private 
rooms within Pac-TARC. During telephone calls participants will first be asked if they are in a place where they 
feel comfortable speaking privately. If not, the call will be rescheduled to a time the participant will have 
privacy.  
 
17. POTENTIAL BENEFITS 
Participants may be able to quit smoking. It is possible that their condition or health may improve because of 
quitting smoking or because of their visits to the research clinic. However, there is no guarantee that they will 
benefit in any way. Information from this study may help other people who would like to quit smoking in the 
future. 
18. RISK/BENEFIT RATIO 
There may or may not be any direct benefit to from the study procedures. Participants may or may not 
decrease smoking cigarettes from the treatment and counseling provided in this study. Participation in the 
study will help determine the feasibility of combining ACT with two different varenicline-assisted quitting 
strategies: a) slower titration of lower dose varenicline monotherapy, versus b) standard titration of standard 
dose varenicline - - both delivered using a flexible quit date paradigm that allows gradual preloading of 
varenicline prior to the target quit date. There will be no charge to participation in this study. These potential 
benefits outweigh the minimal risks involved. 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 22 
 
19. EXPENSE TO PARTICIPANT 
The study drugs, study-related procedures, and study visits will be provided at no charge to the subject.  
 
20. COMPENSATION FOR PARTICIPATION 
Participants will be compensated up to $390 for their participation assuming they complete all study visits and 
phone calls.  Participants will be compensated at the following rates:  
Screening visit, $20; Face-to-face visits on study weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 ($25 each); 5 
phone visits on weeks 7, 9, 11, 16, 20 ($15 each); and 3 face-to-face visits on study weeks 1, 3, and 
5 ($15 each); weeks 12 & 24 completion ($25 each) and bonus payments ($25 each) for consistent 
attendance.  
If requested, participants will also be provided with transportation to/from the research site in 
accordance with UCSD-contracted Lyft rideshare services paid by Pac-TARC.  
 
21. PRIVILEGES/CERTIFICATIONS/LICENSES AND RESEARCH TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES 
Investigators and research personnel are trained in ethical standards for human research and are current with 
IRB requirements for training and certification and adhere to ICH guidelines. To ensure that all research 
activities are in full compliance with HRPP standards, Dr. Anthenelli chairs a weekly meeting with the research 
team to provide oversight regarding recruitment, research procedures and the clinical status of all active 
subjects. 
 
Robert M. Anthenelli, M.D. is Professor and Executive Vice Chair in the Department of Psychiatry and the 
Director of Pac-TARC. He has over 20 years of experience conducting clinical research in tobacco and other 
drug dependent individuals with comorbid psychiatric disorders including smoking cessation studies in persons 
with mental health conditions.  He will oversee all aspects of the trial Dr. Anthenelli's responsibilities for this 
project include: 1) supervising all staff; manage overall study design and coordination; assist staff with clinical 
management of the trial; data analyses; preparation of abstracts, manuscripts, and other publications. 
 
Benjamin McKenna, Ph.D. is a Project Scientist in the Department of Psychiatry and Staff Psychologist in the 
San Diego VA Healthcare System. He is a co-investigator on the study aiding in the oversight of the study with 
Dr. Anthenelli including: 1) supervising the ACT therapy; manage overall study design and coordination; assist 
staff with clinical management of the trial; data analyses; preparation of abstracts, manuscripts, and other 
publications. 
 
Vivian Hook, Ph.D. is a Professor of Pharmacology in the UCSD Skaggs School of Pharmacy & 
Pharmaceutical Sciences. She is a co-investigator on the study responsible for the oversight of the mass 
spectrometry processing and analyses to determine the nicotine metabolite ratio.  
 
Niloo Afari, Ph.D. is a Professor of Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry. She is a co-investigator 
responsible for the dissemination of and training therapists to deliver the ACT therapy. She will work with Dr. 
McKenna to supervise therapists delivering ACT.  
 
Jamiee Heffner, Ph.D. is an Assistant Member at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, 
Washington. She is a long-time collaborator of Dr. Anthenelli, and on this project she will train study staff on the 
delivery of ACT therapy in SMI patients. Her research program is in this area with studies examining the 
effectiveness of ACT for smoking cessation in SMI. She will work with the study team to implement ACT in this 
clinical sample including logistics, therapy manuals, and answering questions as they arise during the course of 
the study. She will be involved with data analyses; preparation of abstracts, manuscripts, and other 
publications. 
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 23 
Jillian Giannini,, B.A. is a Lab Assistant I. She will assist the study team with day-to-day laboratory activities 
and recruitment and screening of study participants. She is trained to administer all of the rating scales to be 
used in the trial.  
 
Xia Li, M.D., Ph.D. is an Assistant Clinical Professor  in the Department of Psychiatry and Pac-TARC. She will 
assist Dr. Anthenelli in the medical and psychiatric assessment of study participants and aid the study team in 
delivering ACT to study participants; screening participants; and recruitment. 
 
22. BIBLIOGRAPHY 
1. Evins AE, Cather C, Laffer A. Treatment of tobacco use disorders in smokers with serious mental illness: toward 
clinical best practices. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015;23(2):90-98.  
 
2. Anthenelli RM. How – and why – to help psychiatric patients stop smoking. Current  
Psychiatry. 2005; 4(1):77-87.  
3. Callaghan RC, Veldhuizen S, Jeysingh T, Orlan C, Graham C, Kakouris G,Remington G, Gatley J. Patterns of tobacco-
related mortality among individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or depression. J Psychiatr Res. 
2014;48(1):102-110  
 
4. Anthenelli RM, Benowitz NL, West R, St. Aubin L, McRae T, Lawrence D, Ascher J, Russ C, Krishen A, Evins AE. 
Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric 
disorders (EAGLES): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10037):2507-20.  
 
5. Heffner J, Ayers C, Russ C, Lawrence D, McRae T, St. Aubin L, Krishen A, Benowitz N, West R, Evins AE, Anthenelli 
RM. Efficacy and safety of 1st-line pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation in bipolar disorder: subgroup analysis of the 
randomized active- and placebo- controlled EAGLES trial. Paper presented at the 24th annual meeting of the Society for 
Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Baltimore, Maryland, February, 2018  
 
6. Evins AE, West R, Benowitz N, Russ C, Lawrence D, McRae T, Anthenelli RM. Safety and efficacy of 
pharmacotherapeutic smoking cessation aids in those with psychotic disorders: a subgroup analysis of the EAGLES trial. 
Paper presented at the 24th annual meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Baltimore, Maryland, 
February, 2018  
 
7. Lerman C, Schnoll RA, Hawk LW Jr, Cinciripini P, George TP, Wileyto EP, Swan GE, Benowitz NL, Heitjan DF, 
Tyndale RF, PGRN-PNAT Research Group. A randomized placebo-controlled trial to test a genetically-informed 
biomarker for personalizing treatment for tobacco dependence. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(2):131-138.  
 
8. Hajek P, McRobbie HJ, Myers KE, Stapleton J, Dhanji A. Use of varenicline for 4 weeks before quitting smoking 
decrease in ad lib smoking and increase in smoking cessation rates. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(8):770–777.  
 
9. Heffner JL, McClure JB, Mull KE, Anthenelli RM, Bricker JB. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and nicotine patch 
for smokers with bipolar disorder: preliminary evaluation of in-person and telephone-delivered treatment. Bipolar Disord. 
2015; 17(5)560-566.  
 
10. Bricker JB, Bush T, Zbikowski SM, Mercer LD, Heffner JL. Randomized trial of telephone-delivered Acceptance and 
Commitment Therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking cessation: a pilot study. Nicotine Tob Res. 
2014;16(11):1446-1454.  
 
11. Chenoweth MJ, Schnoll RA, Novalen M, Hawk LW, George TP, Cinciripini PM, Lerman C, Tyndale RF. The nicotine 
metabolic ratio is associated with early smoking abstinence even after controlling factors that influence the nicotine 
metabolite ratio. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(4):491-495.  
 
12. Schnoll RA, Patterson F, Wileyto EP, Tyndale RF, Benowitz N, Lerman C. Nicotine metabolic rate predicts successful 
smoking cessation with transdermal nicotine: a validation study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009;92(1):6-11.  
 
13. Oncken C, Gonzales D, Nides M, Rennard S, Watsky E, Billing CB, Anziano R, Reeves K. Efficacy and safety of the 
novel selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, varenicline, for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med. 
2006;166(15):1571–1577.  

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 24 
 
14. Nides M, Oncken C, Gonzales D, Rennard S, Watsky EJ, Anziano R, Reeves KR. Smoking cessation with 
varenicline, a selective α4β2 nicotinic receptor partial agonist: results from a 7-week, randomized, placebo- and 
bupropion-controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1561–1568.  
 
15. Fouz-Rosón N, Montemayor-Rubio T, Almadana-Pacheco V, Montserrat-García S, Gómez-Bastero A. P, Romero-
Muñoz C, Polo-Padillo J. Effect of 0.5 mg versus 1 mg varenicline for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. 
Addiction. 2017;112:1610–1619.  
 
16. Ashare RL, Tang KZ, Mesaros AC, Blair IA, Leone F, Strasser AA. Effects of 21 days of varenicline versus placebo on 
smoking behaviors and urges among non-treatment seeking smokers. J Psychopharmacol. 2012;26(10):1383-1390.  
 
17. Hawk LW, Ashare RL, Lohnes SF, Schlienz NJ, Rhodes JD, Tiffany ST, Gass JC, Cummings KM, Mahoney MC. The 
Effects of extended pre-quit varenicline treatment on smoking behavior and short-term abstinence: a randomized clinical 
trial. Clinical Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(2):172-180.  
 
18. Brandon TH, Unrod M, Drobes DJ, Sutton SK, Hawk LW, Simmons VN, Brandon KO, Roetzheim RG, Meltzer LR, 
Miller RR, Cahill SP. Facilitated extinction training to improve pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation: a pilot feasibility 
trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;(20)10:1189-1197.  
 
19. Rennard S, Hughes J, Cinciripini PM, Kralikova E, Raupach T, Arteaga C, Aubin LB, Russ C; Flexible Quit Date Study 
Group. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of varenicline for smoking cessation allowing flexible quit dates. Nicotine 
Tob Res. 2012;14(3):343-350.  
 
20. Williams JM, Gandhi KK, Lu S-E, Steinberg ML, Benowitz NL. Nicotine intake and smoking topography in smokers 
with bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorders. 2012;14(6):618-627.  
 
21. Dubroff JG, Doot RK, Falcone M, Schnoll RA, Ray R, Tyndale RF, Brody AL, Hou C, Schmitz A, Lerman C. 
Decreased nicotinic receptor availability in smokers with slow rates of nicotine metabolism. J Nucl Med. 
2015;56(11):1724-1729.  
 
22. Lotfipour S, Mandelkern M, Alvarez-Estrada M, L Brody A. A single administration of low-dose varenicline saturates 
α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(7):1738-1748.  
 
23. Hughes JR, Russ CI, Arteaga CE, Rennard SI. Efficacy of a flexible quit date versus an a priori quit date approach to 
smoking cessation: a cross-study analysis. Addict Behav. 2011;36(12):1288-1291.  
 
24. Leas EC, Pierce JP, Benmarhnia T, White MM, Noble ML, Trinidad DR, Strong DR. Effectiveness of pharmaceutical 
smoking cessation aids in a nationally representative cohort of american smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(6):581-
587.  
 
25. Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for 
smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;24;3:CD008286  
 
26. Chenoweth MJ, Novalen M, Hawk LW Jr, Schnoll RA, George TP, Cinciripini PM, Lerman C, Tyndale RF. Known and 
novel sources of variability in the nicotine metabolite ratio in a large sample of treatment-seeking smokers. Cancer 
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(9):1773-1782.  
 
27. Anthenelli RM, Morris C, Ramey TS, Dubrava SJ, Tsilkos K, Russ C, Yunis C. Effects of varenicline on smoking 
cessation in adults with stably-treated current or past major depression: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 
2013;159(6):390-400  
 
28. Biener L, Abrams DB. The Contemplation Ladder: a validation of measure of readiness to consider smoking 
cessation. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):360-365.  
 
29. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-
International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric 
interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-23;quiz 34-57.  

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 25 
 
30. Fagerström K. Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette 
Dependence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(1):75-78  
 
31. Hughes JR, Hatsukami D. Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43(3):289–294.  
 
32. Cox LS, Tiffany ST, Christen AG. Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and 
clinical settings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001;3(1):7-16.  
 
33. Sobell LC, Brown J, Leo GI, Sobell MB. The reliability of Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by 
telephone and by computer. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;42(1):49-54.  
 
34. Fals-Stewart W, O'Farrell TJ, Freitas TT, McFarlin SK, Rutigliano P. The timeline followback reports of psychoactive 
substance use by drug-abusing patients: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(1):134-144.  
 
35. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatric Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.  
 
36. Altman EG, Hedeker D, Peterson JL, Davis JM. The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale. Biol Psychiatry. 
1997;42(10):948-955.  
 
37. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, 
Mann JJ. The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three 
multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266-1277.  
 
38. Bastien CH, Vallières A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia 
research. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):297-307.  
 
39. Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service 
utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-237.  
 
40. Kelly PJ, Kyngdon F, Ingram I, Deane FP, Baker AL, and Osborne BA. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8: 
Psychometric properties in a cross-sectional survey of people attending residential substance abuse treatment. Drug 
Alcohol Rev. 2018;37(1):79–86  
 
41. Farris SG, Zvolensky MJ, DiBello AM, Schmidt NB. Validation of the Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS) among 
treatment-seeking smoker. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(2):467-477.  
 
42. Etter JF, Bergman MM, Humair JP, Perneger TV. Development and validation of a scale measuring self-efficacy of 
current and former smokers. Addiction. 2000;95(6)901-913.  
 
43. Pinsker EA, Hennrikus DJ, Erickson DJ, Call KT, Forster JL, Okuyemi KS. Trends in self-efficacy to quit and smoking 
urges among homeless smokers participating in a smoking cessation RCT. Addict Behav. 2018;78:43-50.  
 
 
44. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf. 1999;20(2):109-
117.  
 
45. Tanner JA, Novalen M, Jatlow P, Huestis MA, Murphy SE, Kaprio J, Kankaanpää A, Galanti L, Stefan C, Geoge TP, 
Benowitz NL, Lerman C, Tyndale RF. Nicotine metabolite ratio (3-hydroxycotinine/cotinine) in plasma and urine by 
different analytical methods and laboratories: implications for clinical implementation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 
2015;24(8):1239-1246.  
 
46. Heffner JL, Anthenelli RM, DelBello MP, Stahl L, Strakowski SM. Mood management and nicotine patch for smoking 
cessation in adults with bipolar disorder. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(11):1805-1806.  
 
47. Bricker JB, Hayes SC. Adherence Raters’ Manual for the “ACT Now” Telephone Smoking Cessation Intervention. 
Unpublished manual.  
 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 26 
48. Gifford EV, Kohlenberg BS, Hayes SC, Pierson HM, Piasecki MP, Antonuccio DO, Palm KM. Does acceptance and 
relationship focused behavior therapy contribute to bupropion outcomes? A randomized controlled trial of functional 
analytic psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation. Behav Ther. 2011;42(4):700-15. 
 
49. Williams JM, Anthenelli RM, Morris CD, Treadow J, Thompson JR, Yunis C, George TP. A randomized, double-blind, 
placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety and efficacy of varenicline for smoking cessation in patients with 
schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(5):654-660.  
 
50. Moore CG, Carter RE, Nietert PJ, Stewart PW. Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and 
translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4(5):332-337.  
 
51. Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 
2011;45(5):626-629.  
 
52. Chengappa KN, Perkins KA, Brar JS, Schlicht PJ, Turkin SR, Hetrick ML, Levine MD, George TP. Varenicline for 
smoking cessation in bipolar disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 
2014;75(7):765-772.  
 
53. Arnold DM, Burns KE, Adhikari NK, Meade MO, Cook DJ; McMaster Critical Care Interest Group. The design and 
interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research in critical care. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1 Suppl):S69-74.  
 
54. Julious S. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceut. Statist. 2005;4:287-291.  
 
55. Birkett MA, Day SJ. Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. Stat Med. 1994;13(23-24):2455-2463.  
 
56. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J 
Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307-312.  
 
57. Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of 
precision and efficacy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(3):301-308.  
 
58. McCann DJ, Petry NM, Bresell A, Isacsson E, Wilson E, Alexander RC. Medication nonadherence, “Professional 
Subjects,” and apparent placebo responders: overlapping challenges for medications development. J Clin 
Psychopharmacol. 2015;35(5):566-573.  
 
59. McCaul ME, Wand GS. Detecting deception in our research participants: are your participants who you think they 
are? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018; 42(2):230–237.  
 
60. Tedeschi GJ, Cummins SE, Anderson CM, Anthenelli RM, Zhuang Y-L, Zhu S-H. Smokers with self-reported mental 
health conditions: a case for screening in the context of tobacco cessation services. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159127.  
 
61. Lasser K, Boyd JW, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, McCormick D, Bor DH. Smoking and mental illness a 
population-based prevalence study. JAMA. 2000;284(20):2606–2610.  
 
62. Grant BF, Hasin DS, Chou SP, Stinson FS, Dawson DA. Nicotine dependence and psychiatric disorders in the United 
States results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 
2004;61(11):1107–1115.  
 
23. FUNDING SUPPORT FOR THIS STUDY 
University of California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program High Impact Pilot Research Award- 
Submitted 
 
24. BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS TRANSFER AGREEMENT 
BMTA not required 
 
25. INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG FACT SHEET AND IND/IDE HOLDER 

 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 27 
All study participants will receive Apo-Varenicline which is a generic form of the FDA-approved medication, 
varenicline, delivered in two different dose strengths. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has allowed this 
generic formulation to be temporarily imported into the U.S.. Apo-Varenicline, contains n-nitroso-varenicline amounts at a 
level deemed acceptable by the FDA. Apo-varenicline is approved for use as a generic medication for smoking cessation 
in Canada. 
 
The “Important Prescribing Information” for Apo-Varenicline is attached.  
 
Varenicline is approved for use in 100 countries and more than 24 million individuals have been exposed to the 
drug worldwide. Notably, following the EAGLES trial results, the FDA removed the box around the 
neuropsychiatric safety warning for this medication.  However, that safety warning remains in the package insert 
and we have captured that in this application.  
 
26. IMPACT ON STAFF 
Not applicable 
 
27. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 
Dr. Anthenelli provides consulting and/or advisory board services to Pfizer via an institutional agreement 
between the sponsor and The Regents of the University of California San Diego. Payment for Dr. Anthenelli’s 
consulting services is received by UC San Diego. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and 
approved by UC San Diego in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.  Dr. Anthenelli has also applied 
for and been awarded an investigator-initiated award from the sponsor to supply study medication for this trial.  
That investigator-initiated supply of varenicline has been suspended, however, because of the voluntary recall 
of Pfizer-made varenicline tablets. The sponsor has no other involvement, Both of these relationships will be 
disclosed to study participants as part of the informed consent process. 
 
Dr. Niloo Afari, a researcher on the study team, receives royalties from New Harbinger, Inc. publishers from 
the sale of a book she co-authored related to ACT. The book Dr. Afari co-authored is not being used in this 
study. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by UC San Diego in accordance with 
its conflict of interest policies. The publishing company has no role in this trial. 
 
 
28. SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR CANCER-RELATED STUDIES 
Not applicable 
 
29. OTHER APPROVALS/REGULATED MATERIALS 
Not applicable 
 
30. PROCEDURES FOR SURROGATE CONSENT AND/OR DECISIONAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 
Participant’s decisional capacity will be assessed during consent by a trained research staff member to ensure 
they fully understand the study. This will be done by a trained staff member asking them questions about the 
details of the study after consenting to ensure that participants understand the study procedures and have the 
capacity to make a decision to enroll in the study. In our experience working with adult participants with severe 
mental illness the vast majority of participants have the capacity to make informed decisions. Are exclusion 
criteria involve acute mood episodes and thus we will exclude participants whose judgment may be altered 
due to their mental illness.