Stop Exogenous Allergic Alveolitis (EAA) in Childhood: Healthy Into Adulthood - A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate Prednisolone Treatment and Course of Disease
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis, Exogenous Allergic Alveolitis
Sponsor: Matthias Griese

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
1 of 51 
 
CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL 
 
 
 
Stop exogenous allergic alveolitis (EAA) in childhood: healthy into adulthood – a 
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate 
prednisolone treatment and course of disease 
 
Short Title: Stop EAA 
 
for Germany 
 
EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS trial code: 2013-007 
Final  
 
 
Version 
 
 2.1 
Date 
 
 
 11.12.2014  
Sponsor 
Coordinating investigator/  
Sponsor Delegated Person (SDP)/ 
Study coordination: 
Institution    Klinikum der Universität München 
 
Address      Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München 
Department/   Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich 
Institution       Paediatric Pneumology 
 
 
Name 
Prof. Dr. med. M. Griese 
Address Lindwurmstr. 4, 80337  Munich 
Phone +49 / 89 / 5160-7871 
Fax 
+49 / 89 / 5160-7872 
e-Mail 
Matthias.griese@med.uni-muenchen.de 
Biometrician 
 
Department/ 
University Medical Center of the 
 
 
 
Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz 
Institution 
Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical  
 
 
 
Trials (IZKS) 
Name 
 
Christian Ruckes 
Address  
Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz 
Phone  
+49/6131/17-9919 
Fax 
 
+49/6131/17-9914 
e-Mail 
 
ruckes@izks-mainz.de 
 
 
 
 
This protocol is confidential information and is intended solely for the guidance of the clinical trial. 
This protocol may not be disclosed to third parties not associated with the clinical trial or used for 
any other purpose without the prior written consent of the sponsor. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
2 of 51 
 
List of abbreviations 
AE 
 
Adverse event 
AMG 
 
German drug law (Arzneimittelgesetz) 
AR 
 
Adverse reaction 
ASP 
 
Application service provider 
BAL 
 
Bronchoalveolar lavage 
BP 
 
Blood pressure 
BSI 
 
Federal Office for Information Security 
Bw 
 
body weight 
CRF 
 
Case report form 
CSUCT 
Computerized systems used in clinical trials 
DCF 
 
Data clarification form 
DLCO 
 
Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide 
DMP 
 
Data management plan 
DPLD  
Diffuse parenchymal lung disease 
DMC 
 
Data monitoring committee 
DSMB  
Data safety monitoring board 
EAA 
 
Extrinsic allergic alveolitis 
EC/IEC  
Ethics committee/Independent ethics committee 
e-CRF  
Electronic case report form 
EDC 
 
Electronic data capture 
EMEA  
European Medicines Agency 
FDA 
 
Food and Drug Administration 
FEV1 
 
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second  
FSI 
 
First subject in 
FVC 
 
Forced vital capacity 
FVC%   
Forced vital capacity in percentage of normal value 
GCP 
 
Good clinical practice 
GCP-V  
GCP regulation 
gGT 
 
Gamma-glutamic transferase 
GOT 
 
Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 
HbA1c  
Glycohemoglobin 
HP 
 
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis 
HRCT  
High resolution computed tomography 
ICH 
 
International conference on harmonization of technical requirements for registration of  
 
 
pharmaceuticals for human use 
IDAT 
 
Subject identification database 
IgG 
 
Immunoglobulin G 
IMP 
 
Investigational medicinal product 
IRB 
 
Institutional review board 
ISF 
 
Investigator site file 
ISP 
 
Internet service provider 
ISRCTN 
International standard randomized controlled trial number 
INN 
 
International non-proprietary name 
ITT 
 
Intention to treat 
IZKS 
 
Interdisciplinary centre for clinical trials  
LDH 
 
Lactatdehydrogenase 
LKP 
 
Clinical Trial Director according (Leiter der Klinischen Prüfung) 
MDAT  
Medical database 
MedDRA 
Medical dictionary for regulatory activities terminology 
NEA 
 
Emergency power supply 
QC 
 
Quality control 
RR 
 
Respiratory rate 
SAE 
 
Serious adverse event 
SAP 
 
Statistical analysis plan 
SAR 
 
Serious adverse reaction 
SAS 
 
Statistical analysis system 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
3 of 51 
 
SDV 
 
Source data verification 
SmPC  
Summary of product characteristics 
SOP 
 
Standard operating procedure 
SPSS  
Statistics program 
SSL 
 
Secure Sockets Layer 
SUSAR 
Suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction 
TMF 
 
Trial master file 
USV 
 
Uninterruptible power supply 
 
 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
4 of 51 
 
Synopsis 
 
COORDINATING 
INVESTIGATOR 
Prof. Dr. med. M. Griese 
Paediatric Pneumology 
Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich 
DZL Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research 
Lindwurmstr. 4, 80337 Munich 
Phone +49 / 89 / 5160-7871 
Fax 
+49 / 89 / 5160-7872 
e-Mail Matthias.griese@med.uni-muenchen.de 
TITLE OF STUDY 
Stop exogenous allergic alveolitis (EAA) in childhood: healthy into adulthood – a 
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate 
prednisolone treatment and course of disease 
RATIONALE 
The long term course of individuals with exogenous allergic alveolitis (EAA) cannot 
be predicted individually, although initial allergen removal and steroid treatment 
appears simple. Some children may have a complicated course; thus all should be 
assessed, treated and followed systematically. 
HYPOTHESIS 
Treatment with placebo will not be inferior in terms of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) 
improvement than treatment with systemic steroids after 6 months treatment. 
OBJECTIVE(S) 
Primary objective: 
To evaluate outcome of EAA at 6 months and compare medium term treatment with 
systemic steroids or placebo. 
Secondary objectives: 
To evaluate the completeness and knowledge of standardized and pedantic allergen 
elimination in families with a child with EAA. 
To evaluate the treatment of EAA with systemic steroids compared to placebo at 3 
months 
To evaluate the safety of the treatment of EAA with outpatient usage of systemic 
steroids compared to placebo 
INTERVENTION(S) 
Experimental intervention: 
Placebo 
Control intervention: 
Prednisolone 
Duration of intervention per patient: 
3 months 
Follow-up per patient: 
6 months 
 
KEY INCLUSION AND 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA 
Key inclusion criteria: 
1. Newly or previously diagnosed but not appropriately treated EAA in children, 
adolescents and young adults (6 to 25 years). The diagnosis of EAA must be 
confirmed by independent review of the findings by an expert panel and must be 
based on the presence of at least 4 of the following findings: 
* History of appropriate allergen exposure 
* Restrictive lung function (FVC < 80% predicted for age and FVC/FEV1 < 1) testing, 
if appropriate for age (usually > 5 y) 
* Positive serum precipitins for bird/fungus exposed to (other allergens have rarely, if 
every been demonstrated in children) 
* Lymphocytosis in BAL (> 20% of cells are lymphocytes) 
* HRCT showing the characteristic nodular, linear or reticular opacities and ground 
glass pattern with increased attenuation.  
* Lung biopsy demonstrating lymphocytic alveolitis, bronchiolitis, and non-caseating 
histiocytic granulomatas. 
* Controlled allergen exposure followed by characteristic reaction, including fever, 
coughing, restriction on lung function, hypoxemia/desaturation at rest or with exercise 
2. Unchanged inhaled steroids if on; if off, no plans to introduce them in the following 
6 months 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
5 of 51 
 
3. Agreement to home visit by independent study physician 
Key exclusion criteria:  
Subjects presenting 1 of the following criteria will not be enrolled in the trial: 
Contraindication for usage of systemic steroids 
Critically ill patients needing respiratory support 
Non-compliance with medical treatments and interventions 
Not appropriate contraception in women of childbearing age, pregnancy and 
lactation 
Participation in another trial for EAA during the last 4 weeks or not beyond the time of 
4 half-lives of the medication used in the other trial. In the unlikely event a subject is 
already in another clinical study but not for EAA, that study must be stopped and the 
subject may be treated according to this protocol; a latency time between the two 
studies does not appear reasonable, as acute intervention is necessary for EAA. 
Treatment may be best done in the frame work of this protocol.  
 
OUTCOME(S) 
Primary efficacy endpoint: 
Relative change from baseline through month 6 compared to change from placebo 
for  
* forced vital capacity (FVC). 
Key secondary endpoint(s): 
Each patient will be classified as a responder or non-responder. A patient is 
considered as a responder, if the FVC value after 6 months is more than or equal to 
93% of the norm values tabulated by Quanjer PH., et al. 2013.  
Relative change from baseline through month 6 compared to change from placebo 
for  
* desaturation with standardized exercise test for children 
* Borg scale 
* Quality-of-life 
* Health economics 
* Weight for height 
* Open usage of rescue glucocorticosteroids (mg/kg/6 months) 
 
Relative change from baseline through month 3 compared to change from placebo 
for  
* forced vital capacity FVC 
* desaturation with standardized exercise test for children 
* Borg scale 
* Quality-of-life 
* Health economics 
* Weight for height 
* Open usage of rescue glucocorticosteroids (mg/kg/6 months) 
 
Assessment of safety: 
* Adverse events 
* Clinical laboratory values (GOT, Creatinine, gGT, blood count, differential, LDH, 
HbA1c) 
* Safety values including blood pressure, height. 
STUDY TYPE 
prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
6 of 51 
 
STATISTICALANALYSIS 
Efficacy:  
The primary analysis variable is the improvement in FVC (difference after 6 months 
and baseline). The 6 months and baseline FVC values will be given in percent 
deviation from the norm values tabulated by Quanjer PH., et al. 2013. 
A difference between the changes in placebo and active treatment is considered not 
significant if FVC differences are < 7%. The working hypothesis of the study is that 
the placebo intervention is not inferior to the prednisolone intervention. 
Description of the primary efficacy analysis and population: 
The improvement in FVC will be compared between groups within an analysis of 
covariance (ANCOVA). Treatment will serve as a fixed factor and the baseline FVC 
value as a covariate. The primary analysis population will consist of all randomized 
patients without any major protocol violations. The two-sided 90% confidence interval 
for the treatment difference will be calculated. Sensitivity analyses will be performed 
by analysing the same analysis model for all randomized patients. Additionally, the 
primary parameter will be analysed by ANCOVA with additional terms for sex and 
height. Centre effects will be explored by descriptive statistics. 
Safety: 
Adverse events will be coded by MedDRA and analysed by descriptive methods. 
Laboratory values will be displayed by sample characteristics over time and 
compared between groups by exploratory p-values. 
Secondary endpoint(s): 
Secondary endpoints will be displayed by descriptive statistics and compared 
between groups by exploratory p-values. 
SAMPLE SIZE 
To be assessed for eligibility:  
(n=60) 
To be allocated to trial:            
(n=45) 
To be analyzed:                       
(n=40) 
TRIAL DURATION 
First patient in to last patient out (months):  24 
Duration of the entire trial (months):  
27 
Recruitment period (months):  
 
18 
PARTICIPATING 
CENTERS 
About 40 trial sites are planned to participate 
 
RELEVANCE  
 World-wide the first, randomized controlled trial in children with interstitial 
lung disease ever and the first clinical project, unifying several pediatric 
pneumology sites from different European countries into a common 
project 
 Direct improvement of the health of children with EAA across Europe and 
wide spread distribution of state of the art protocols to diagnose and treat 
EAA in childhood.  
 Substantial increased awareness of the child-EU-project in the pediatric 
pneumology area 
 Strengthened position of the European Pediatric Pneumology within the 
international Pneumology Scene 
 
STUDY FLOW CHART 
 
 
 
 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version  2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
7 of 51 
 
Trial schedule 
Table 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Visit 
Inpatient 
Inpatient 
Inpatient 
Inpatient 
Visit 1 
Visit 2 
 and 
Visit 3 
Telephone contact trial day 126 (119, 133)j 
Visit 4 
Long term 
follow up 
Action 
Screening, 
diagnosis 
confirmation, 
allergen 
elimination 
Baseline 
Steroid 
pulse 
Treatment 
Discharge 
1 month 
Personal 
contact 2 
month 
3 month 
6 month 
annually 
Trial day 
-21 to -2 
-4 to -2 
-2 to 0 
1 
28 (21, 
35) 
56 (49, 
63) 
 
84 
 (74, 94) 
168  
(148, 188) 
annually 
Demographics (sex, age, race) 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Patient information, informed consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Previous and concomitant diseases 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
Previous and concomitant treatments 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
Inclusion/exclusion criteria 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Randomization a 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medication supply 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Expert allergen consultation and education b 
X (in 
hospital) 
 
 
 
 
X (at 
home) 
 
 
 
Physical examination 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
Pregnancy testk 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Vital signs (Height, weight, BP, pulse, temp) c 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
Blood sample d 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FVC % predicted (spirometry) e 
X* 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
O2-saturation, respiratory rate and Borg 
scalef  
X* 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Standardized exercise testingg 
X* 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
HRCT 
(X) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Health economicsh 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
Quality-of-lifei 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
Adverse events 
 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
End of trial (final visit) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
Build a cohort 
into adulthood 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version  2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
8 of 51 
 
X*  
Test must be done before first drug dosing 
 
 
a Randomization must occur after all inclusion and exclusion criteria are met directly after consent to the study is given and at least 1 week before first dose of 
oral prednisolone. 
 
b SOP for allergen elimination will be provided 
 
c Weight and height will be measured with shoes and clothes off. Vital signs will be collected after the patient has been at rest for 5 minutes.  
 
d Blood sample should include: Blood count with differential, Potassium, GOT (Aspartate aminotransferase), gGT, Creatinine, LDH (Lactate dehydrogenase), 
glucose, HbA1c.  
 
e SOP will be provided. 
 
f Measurement of O2-Saturation, respiratory rate and O2 flow (if necessary) in awake patient at rest: 
 
If not on O2: after 5 min at rest, room air, then measure twice over 1 min. each, at least 1 min. apart 
 
If on O2:  
- 
BEFORE withdrawal (after 5 min at rest with steady state O2 supplement, then measure over 1 minute) 
- 
Then withdraw O2 to obtain steady state O2-Sat. in room air (at least 30 seconds without change). Then measure twice over 1 min. each, at least 1 
min. apart.    If falls below SpO2<80% place back in oxygen and note as <80%.  
Borg-Scale: assessment of dyspnea (0 – 10: 0 = no dyspnea at all, 5 = severe dyspnea, 10 = extremely severe dyspnea)  
 
g Standardized exercise testing: SOP for 6 min running test will be provided 
 
h Health economics assessment with the use of a special questionnaire which has to be filled out by the parents 
 
i Quality of Life assessment with the use of the questionnaire PedsQL for different age groups  
 
j Telephone contact: Parents must be asked for symptoms and status of allergen elimination 
 
k Pregnancy test only has to be performed in girls of childbearing age and only if sexual relations are known or probable. It is at the discretion and responsibility of 
the attending physician to decide, whether a pregnancy test is necessary or not 
 
 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
9 of 51 
 
 
Table of Contents 
1. 
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 12 
1.1 
Scientific background ..................................................................................................... 12 
1.2 
Trial rationale ................................................................................................................. 12 
1.3 
Treatments and rationale for dose selection ................................................................... 13 
1.4 
Summarized risk-benefit assessment ............................................................................. 14 
2. 
TRIAL OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 15 
2.1 
Primary objective ............................................................................................................ 15 
2.2 
Secondary objectives ..................................................................................................... 15 
TRIAL DESIGN ............................................................................................................................ 15 
3. 
TRIAL DESIGN .................................................................................................................... 15 
3.1 
Trial duration and schedule ............................................................................................ 15 
3.2 
Number of subjects ........................................................................................................ 15 
3.3 
Primary endpoint ............................................................................................................ 15 
3.4 
Secondary endpoints ...................................................................................................... 16 
3.5 
Measures taken to minimize/avoid bias .......................................................................... 16 
3.5.1 
Randomization ...................................................................................................... 16 
3.5.2 
Blinding ................................................................................................................. 16 
3.6 
Selection and withdrawal of subjects .............................................................................. 17 
3.6.1 
Inclusion criteria .................................................................................................... 17 
3.6.2 
Exclusion criteria ................................................................................................... 17 
3.6.3 
Withdrawal criteria ................................................................................................ 18 
3.6.4 
Premature closure of the clinical trial .................................................................... 18 
4. 
TRIAL TREATMENTS .......................................................................................................... 19 
4.1 
Identification and elimination of EAA Allergens ............................................................... 19 
4.2 
Investigational treatments............................................................................................... 20 
4.2.1 
General information about investigational medicinal product (IMP) ....................... 20 
4.2.2 
Therapeutic effects ............................................................................................... 20 
4.2.3 
Known side effects ................................................................................................ 20 
4.2.4 
Dosage schedule .................................................................................................. 25 
4.2.5 
Overdose instructions ........................................................................................... 25 
4.2.6 
Treatment assignment .......................................................................................... 26 
4.2.7 
Treatment after the end of the trial ........................................................................ 26 
4.2.8 
Packaging and labelling ........................................................................................ 26 
4.2.9 
Drug storage, supplies and accountability ............................................................. 26 
4.2.10 
Procedures for monitoring subject compliance ...................................................... 26 
4.2.11 
Medication intake .................................................................................................. 26 
4.3 
Not permitted medication................................................................................................ 26 
4.4 
Open rescue treatment if lung function does not improve ............................................... 27 
5. 
TRIAL SCHEDULE .............................................................................................................. 27 
6. 
TRIAL METHODS ................................................................................................................ 28 
6.1 
Assessment of efficacy ................................................................................................... 28 
6.2 
Assessment of safety ..................................................................................................... 28 
6.2.1 
Adverse events ..................................................................................................... 28 
6.2.1.1 
Definitions ............................................................................................................. 28 
6.2.1.2 
Assessment of AEs by investigator ....................................................................... 30 
6.2.1.3 
Period of observation ............................................................................................ 32 
6.2.1.4 
Documentation of AEs and Follow up ................................................................... 32 
6.2.1.5 
Immediate reporting of SAEs by investigator ........................................................ 32 
6.2.1.6 
Immediate Reporting of pregnancy by investigator ............................................... 33 
6.2.1.7 
Documentation of Abuse, Misuse, Overdose and Medication Error ....................... 33 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
10 of 51 
 
6.2.2 
Other safety data .................................................................................................. 33 
6.2.2.1 
Safety evaluation and Reporting by sponsor ......................................................... 33 
6.2.2.2 
Emergency procedures ......................................................................................... 33 
6.3 
Other assessments ........................................................................................................ 34 
6.3.1 
Prior and concomitant illnesses............................................................................. 34 
6.3.2 
Prior and concomitant treatments ......................................................................... 34 
STATISTICS ................................................................................................................................ 34 
7. 
STATISTICS ........................................................................................................................ 34 
7.1 
Sample size.................................................................................................................... 34 
7.2 
Analysis populations ....................................................................................................... 34 
7.3 
Efficacy analyses ........................................................................................................... 35 
7.3.1 
Definition and analysis of primary endpoint ........................................................... 35 
7.3.2 
Analysis of secondary endpoints ........................................................................... 35 
7.3.3 
Analysis of Subgroups .......................................................................................... 36 
7.3.4 
Interim analyses .................................................................................................... 36 
7.4 
Analysis of adverse events ............................................................................................. 36 
7.5 
Analysis of clinical laboratory findings ............................................................................ 36 
8. 
QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ............................................................ 36 
8.1 
Requirements for investigational sites and staff .............................................................. 36 
8.2 
Direct entries .................................................................................................................. 36 
8.3 
Direct access to source data/documents ........................................................................ 36 
8.4 
Investigator site file and archiving ................................................................................... 37 
8.5 
Monitoring ...................................................................................................................... 37 
8.6 
Inspection by authority and audits .................................................................................. 37 
8.7 
Audits ............................................................................................................................. 37 
9. 
DATA MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 37 
9.1 
Subject identification database (IDAT)............................................................................ 38 
9.2 
Medical Database / eCRF (MDAT) ................................................................................. 38 
9.3 
Secure Hosting of the Medical database (MDAT) ........................................................... 38 
9.4 
Internet interface IDAT / MDAT ...................................................................................... 39 
9.5 
Data entry ...................................................................................................................... 39 
9.6 
Data concealment for electronic transfer ........................................................................ 40 
9.7 
Database quality control ................................................................................................. 40 
9.8 
Storage and archiving of data ......................................................................................... 41 
10. 
ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS .................................................................................... 41 
10.1 Good clinical practice ..................................................................................................... 41 
10.2 Patient information and informed consent ...................................................................... 41 
10.3 Confidentiality ................................................................................................................. 42 
10.4 Responsibilities of investigator ....................................................................................... 42 
10.5 Approval of trial protocol and substantial amendments ................................................... 43 
10.6 Submission to local regulatory/competent authority ........................................................ 43 
10.7 Data monitoring committee (DMC) ................................................................................. 43 
10.8 Insurance ....................................................................................................................... 43 
10.9 Agreements .................................................................................................................... 43 
10.9.1 
Financing of the trial.............................................................................................. 43 
10.9.2 
Report ................................................................................................................... 44 
10.9.3 
Publication policy .................................................................................................. 44 
11. 
SIGNATURES .................................................................................................................. 45 
12. 
DECLARATION OF INVESTIGATOR ............................................................................... 46 
References .................................................................................................................................. 47 
13. 
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 47 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
11 of 51 
 
14. 
APPENDIX DOSAGE TABLE ........................................................................................... 49 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
12 of 51 
 
1. INTRODUCTION 
1.1 Scientific background 
 
Exogenous (extrinsic) allergic alveolitis (EAA) is a complex syndrome with a broad spectrum of clinical 
presentations, disease intensity, and natural course (Blatmann 2012). In the English literature the entity is 
also called hypersensitivity pneumonitis.  
The diagnosis is based on history, restrictive lung function, and radiographic, and lung lavage or sometimes 
biopsy findings.  
 
The problem 
Treatment primarily is based on removal of the patient from the suspected etiologic exposure. At first glance 
this may be very easy and straight forward in many patients. However in some it is cumbersome has to be 
controlled by treating physicians and may unfortunately remain incomplete in clinical practice. Sometimes, 
and this cannot be predicted, allergen exposure obviously is reported to be not given, but symptoms remain 
or resolution is incomplete. The exact cause cannot be identified or eliminated, as it remains obscure.  
 
Overall, unfortunately, in about 25% and not individually or prospectively identifiable patients, disease activity 
for some reasons does not resolve (Griese et al 2013). These patients need to be identified early. As the 
overall number of children with this entity is rather low, this is only possible when all subjects are 
prospectively followed to identify those with a problem. 
 
Additional problems may be associated with glucocorticoid treatment. This is given very frequently, however 
may only be required in more severe cases. A huge disadvantage of glucocorticosteroid treatment is that in 
case of a reduced but continuing allergen exposure, the inflammatory activity is ongoing, maintaining chronic 
disease and slow development of fibrosis in the lungs. At the same time symptoms and lung function are 
improved and the clues to allergen removal are disguised.  
 
Compared to many other allergens, exposure to bird´s allergen (Bird fancier's EAA, pigeon breeder's 
disease) appears to have a worse prognosis (Minder 2005). EAA from bird allergens is also the primary 
cause in children (see below). Frequently high levels of bird antigens can be detected in the home 
environment over prolonged time periods after bird removal and cleaning (Craig 1992). Several groups have 
noted chronic, progressive, and fatal cases of EAA secondary to bird antigen exposure (Grammer 1990, 
Remy-Jardin 1993, Zacharisen 2002). In some series of chronic pigeon breeder's lung a high mortality (29 
percent at five years) was observed (Pérez-Padilla 1993). 
Nowadays on the lung transplant waiting lists in Munich and Hannover are at any point in time about 4 to 6 
young adult patients with end stage lung disease from EAA awaiting lung transplant (personal 
communication). In Hannover, 26 patients with EAA were listed in the last 4 years; 11 are transplanted 
meanwhile, 4 have died (personal communication). Thus a significant real long term problem exists which 
may be tackled by the approach suggested. 
 
1.2 Trial rationale 
 
The impact 
Thus it is clear that appropriate treatment including secondary prophylaxis is currently not widely 
implemented in an efficient way. A significant source of morbidity, likely earlier mortality in adulthood, 
psychosocial and socio-economic burden exists despite principal diagnosis of the entity. This and a late 
diagnosis in up to a quarter of the children with EAA (own data) and inappropriate steroid treatment must be 
overcome to improve management of EAA. We also hypothesize that prednisolone treatment may mask 
appropriate allergen removal and will tend to drive the patient into chronic lung disease, due to continuous 
allergen firing of the disease process. 
 
This European-wide study will address these issues and will help to implement an exhaustive procedure for 
everyday care of this most important pediatric interstitial lung disease. 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
13 of 51 
 
 We will locate all pediatric EAA patients by monthly European wide alerts to all institutions treating 
children 
 We will supply up-to-date information on the diagnosis of EAA and have the diagnosis peer-reviewed 
 We assist with allergen identification; verify removal of the allergen exposure and secondary exposure 
prophylaxis 
 The protocol will allow one initial treatment to help rapid recovery from hypoxemia and it will offer 
randomized, placebo-controlled medium term treatment with prednisolone.  
 We will collect the albeit small cohort of all newly diagnosed children from the beginning, which is 
important as it cannot be predicted who will have a complicated course and who will not. 
 We will externally verify removal of the allergen exposure by a home visit 
 We will be able to make a decision on the benefit and risks of prednisolone treatment in EAA 
 We will build up a long term cohort of children for follow up into adulthood within the European Pediatric 
Pneumology community based on the child-EU-project 
 We will prevent patients from running early into chronic respiratory failure, early death or lung transplant 
 
 
1.3 Treatments and rationale for dose selection 
 
EAA – own and other studies 
 
In a recent survey on the incidence and classification of pediatric diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD, 
interstitial lung diseases) in Germany, the major contributor was EAA, making up 30% of all cases over all 
age groups and among 65% of all cases among the diseases occurring beyond infancy (Griese 2009). Thus 
EAA is the major interstitial lung disease in children. This is in contrast to the French cohort where 5 cases of 
children were reported, which comprised only those cases reported to a register (Nathan 2012).  
 
In a recent study we investigated twenty-three children with confirmed pediatric EAA (age 9.4 y (4.4-15.1)), 
prospectively collected in the nationwide survey and submitted to us for evaluation (Griese et al 2013). The 
children presented with dyspnoea at rest or with exercise, mean FVC was 39% of predicted, seven of the 23 
children already had a chronic disease state at presentation, including clubbing. Clubbing predicts a worse 
outcome in adults (Sansores 1990). IgG against bird was elevated in 20, and against fungi in 15. Except 2 
(those treated in our center), all children were treated with prolonged courses of systemic steroids. Outcome 
was not favorable in all cases treated with steroids, i.e. chronic hypoxemia and very prolonged steroid usage 
were present in several cases.  
 
EAA in children, although relatively common for pediatric pulmonologists but seen infrequently by many 
other physicians treating these children, may not be recognized and treated appropriately. A recent study 
from Denmark reported 19 pediatric cases who were treated with 15 courses (8–34) of monthly intravenous 
methylprednisolone pulses in resolved cases. This extremely invasive therapy was not sufficient for the vast 
majority (92%) of children, necessitating additional therapy in all but 1 patient. Nevertheless, normal values 
of FEV1 or FVC were not reached (Buchvald 2011). 
 
 
Medication and previous studies 
Glucocorticoid treatment is currently prescribed for all symptomatic pediatric patients with EAA (Griese 
2009). Prednisolone may accelerate recovery; however, the long-term outcome appears not to be altered 
(Kokkarinen 1992, Mönkäre 1983).  
 
In this study we propose to use a single three day boost of steroids in order to allow a rapid symptomatic 
recovery (as described below) of the children and then randomize to a relatively low dose taper of 
prednisolone, as frequently done in current practice.  
 
To our knowledge there are no randomized trials, even in adults (in patients) with EAA due to bird allergens.  
 
One study of 93 patients with farmer's lung compared patients treated with glucocorticoids for 4 or 12 weeks 
to control patients treated with antigen avoidance alone (Mönkäre 1983). Symptom resolution was more 
rapid among the glucocorticoid-treated groups, but no differences in the course of disease among the three 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
14 of 51 
 
groups were noted after six months. The 12 week glucocorticoid regimen offered no advantage over the four 
week regimen. This study is limited by the fact that the non-glucocorticoid-treated group was less severe and 
that the study was not blinded. 
 
A trial of 36 persons with acute farmer's lung randomized patients to eight weeks of treatment with either 
prednisolone or placebo (Kokkarinen 1992). After one month, there was a significant improvement in DLCO 
in the prednisolone-treated group, but no statistically significant differences in FVC, FEV1, or DLCO were 
found after that time until follow-up was terminated at five years.  
 
There are yet no randomized controlled trials in pediatric EAA patients at all. 
 
1.4 Summarized risk-benefit assessment 
 
The need for a trial: 
Based on our previous studies we know that at least 50% of the children with newly diagnosed 
EAA are not appropriately diagnosed and a majority is treated in a non-standardized manner, very 
much relying on long term usage of systemic steroids (Griese 2009). This strategy has down-sides, 
especially the blurring of accurate allergen removal. This will result in chronic lung disease driven 
by long term allergen exposure, as described above.  
With this study we will introduce a rigorous and externally controlled program to identify and 
remove offending allergens. This very likely will result in dissolution of the driving force for chronic 
lung disease; in the placebo arm not treated with steroids we will be able to see the efficacy of 
allergen removal in the short term, and during the latter part, when all subjects are off medication 
this can be identified in the prednisolone arm. Taken together the study design will allow an 
unbiased judgment of the overall efficacy of allergen removal in pediatric EAA and also of the value 
and risks of medium term prednisolone treatment.  
So far there are no randomized trials in pediatric EAA, cases and series available demonstrate this 
unfortunate situation. 
 
Summarized risk-benefit assessment: 
Although controlled studies are lacking in children, corticosteroids are considered to be effective in 
EAA in improving symptoms and reversing radiographic and lung function abnormalities (Fan 
2002). However the long-term outcome appears to be unchanged by glucocorticoid treatment 
(Kokkarinen 1992).  
It is known that the treatment with systemic steroids in general can be followed by a variety of side 
effects and is not tolerated in all patients (Saag 2013).  
Common side effects of systemic steroid therapy in general are: increased risk for infections, 
Cushing syndrome, low serum potassium, fluid retention, mood changes, growth retardation, 
hypertension, peptic ulcerations, reduced wound healing, muscle weakness. Therefore during the 
study physical examination is performed and serum potassium, renal function and blood pressure 
are monitored.  
The side effects of steroid therapy are dependent on dose and duration of therapy. There is a large 
body of evidence from many different diseases that high-dose pulse steroids have fewer side 
effects than systemic steroids at the same cumulative dose but given daily over prolonged periods 
of time. Generally short term pulse steroid therapy is considered save in pediatrics with very little 
risk (Reinhardt 2004). In the retrospective chart review of Buchvald 2011 patients were treated with 
monthly high dose intravenous steroid pulses over a median time of 15 months, without major 
steroid induced side effects. In the study proposed here, patients receive only one single steroid 
pulse over three days. So the risk for major side effects is considered to be very low due to the 
short time of high dose steroid treatment.  

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
15 of 51 
 
Concerning the low dose oral prednisolone following the steroid pulse it is important to know, that 
in current practice steroids are often used in EAA treatment, either as a pulse or as oral low dose 
therapy. With the dose used in this study decreasing over three months the risk of developing a 
Cushing syndrome is present but relatively low; in particular with the avoidance of inhaled steroids 
over longer time courses and close monitoring of potential side effects we believe that the potential 
benefit of the treatment outweighs risks definitely.  
 
The investigator will be informed about any relevant or new finding including AEs relating to 
treatment with the investigational medicinal product. 
 
2. TRIAL OBJECTIVES 
2.1 Primary objective 
 
The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate outcome of EAA at 6 months and compare the 
medium term treatment with systemic steroids or placebo. 
 
2.2 Secondary objectives 
The secondary objective(s) of the trial is/are 
a) To evaluate the completeness and knowledge of standardized and pedantic allergen 
elimination in families with a child with EAA. 
b) To evaluate the treatment of EAA with systemic steroids compared to placebo at 3 months. 
c) To evaluate the safety of the treatment of EAA with outpatient usage of systemic steroids 
compared to placebo 
This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-
group study.  
3. TRIAL DESIGN 
3.1 Trial duration and schedule 
The duration of this trial is expected to be 27 months. The subject recruitment proposed to start in 
Q4/2013 and should last as long as possible, at least till the end of the chILD-EU project or longer 
if possible. The actual overall trial duration or subject recruitment period may vary from this time 
period. 
3.2 Number of subjects 
It is planned to assess 60 subjects for eligibility, to allocate 45 subjects to the trial and to analyse 
40 subjects. 
Recruitment and treatment of subjects is expected to be performed in > 40 trial centers.  
3.3 Primary endpoint  
The primary endpoint is the relative change from baseline through month 6 compared to change 
from placebo for forced vital capacity (FVC). 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
16 of 51 
 
3.4 Secondary endpoints 
Each patient will be classified as a responder or non-responder. A patient is considered as a 
responder, if the FVC value after 6 months is more than or equal to 93% of the norm values 
tabulated by Quanjer PH., et al. 2013. 
Further secondary endpoints are: 
Relative change from baseline through month 6 compared to change from placebo for  
* desaturation with standardized exercise test for children 
* Borg scale 
* Quality-of-life 
* Health economics 
* Weight for height 
* Open usage of rescue glucocorticosteroids (mg/kg/6 months) 
 
Relative change from baseline through month 3 compared to change from placebo for  
* forced vital capacity (FVC) 
* desaturation with standardized exercise test for children 
* Borg scale 
* Quality-of-life 
* Health economics 
* Weight for height 
* Open usage of rescue glucocorticosteroids (mg/kg/6 months) 
 
3.5 Measures taken to minimize/avoid bias 
3.5.1 Randomization  
Patients will be allocated to the two treatments, i.e., oral prednisolone and placebo, in a ratio of 1:1 
by central randomization within each age group.  
The randomization procedure will not consider the sex of the patients, since no sex-specific 
responses to prednisolone therapy have been reported yet and are not expected. The 
randomization list will be generated by the IZKS Mainz using a pseudo-random number generator 
to ensure that the resulting treatment allocation will be both reproducible and non-predictable. 
During inpatient treatment each patient to be included will receive the next consecutive random/ 
patient number from a block of randomization numbers. Study medication will be packed and 
blinded according to the random list. Each patient medication box will be sent together with the 
sealed unblinding codes (i.e. envelopes) to the sites. The investigator has to take care that each 
patient will be provided with the study medication box bearing the correct randomization number. 
The randomization list is to be kept confidential and is only accessible to authorized personnel until 
the code is broken. At the end of the trial, any emergency opening of the envelopes will be 
controlled after collecting the explanations for unblinding and checking the unused treatment units. 
The code will be broken regularly only at the end of the study after freezing the statistics database 
(by checking the data, recording any protocol violations etc.) allowing the collected data to be 
analyzed. 
 
3.5.2 Blinding 
Blinding will be achieved by providing the study-specific prednisolone and placebo tablets in 
blinded capsules.   

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
17 of 51 
 
 
In the case of a medical emergency requiring identification of the treatment taken by the patient, 
the investigator has the right to open the respective envelope, but every effort should be taken to 
avoid unblinding of patients except the information will be needed for the emergency treatment. 
Opened envelopes have to be signed, dated and the reason for unblinding has to be documented. 
The envelope has then to be filed in the patient notes and the sponsor and/or the responsible 
monitor has to be informed. Unblinded patients have to be withdrawn from the study. No other 
reason than an emergency may justify unblinding. After unblinding the investigator has also to note 
the date, time and reason in the source documents. 
The unblinding codes are not to be opened by the investigator at the end of the trial. 
3.6 Selection and withdrawal of subjects 
No subject will be allowed to enrol in this trial more than once. 
3.6.1 Inclusion criteria 
Subjects meeting all of the following criteria will be considered for admission to the trial: 
 
1. Newly or previously diagnosed but not appropriately treated EAA in children, adolescents and 
young adults, aged between 6 and 25 years. The diagnosis of EAA must be confirmed by 
independent review of the findings by an expert panel and must be based on the presence of at 
least 4 of the following findings: 
* History of appropriate allergen exposure 
* Restrictive lung function (FVC < 80% predicted for age and FVC/FEV1 < 1) testing, if appropriate 
for age (usually > 5 y) 
* Positive serum precipitins for bird/fungus exposed to (other allergens have rarely, if every been 
demonstrated in children) 
* Lymphocytosis in BAL (> 20% of cells are lymphocytes) 
* HRCT showing the characteristic nodular, linear or reticular opacities, and ground glass pattern 
with increased attenuation.  
* Lung biopsy demonstrating lymphocytic alveolitis, bronchiolitis, and non-caseating histiocytic 
granulomatas. 
* Controlled allergen exposure followed by characteristic reaction, including fever, coughing, 
restriction on lung function, hypoxemia/desaturation at rest or with exercise 
2. Unchanged inhaled steroids if on; if off, no plans to introduce them in the following 6 months 
3. Agreement to home visit by independent study physician 
3.6.2 Exclusion criteria 
Subjects presenting with any of the following criteria will not be included in the trial: 
 
 
Contraindication for usage systemic steroids 
 
Critically ill patients needing respiratory support 
 
Non-compliance with medical treatments and interventions 
 Women with childbearing potential and not practicing a medically accepted contraception 
during the trial and a positive pregnancy test (serum or urine) before and at the end of the 
trial. Reliable contraception are systematic contraceptives (oral, implant, injection) and 
diaphragm or condoms with spermicide. 
 
Pregnancy and lactation. 
 Participation in another trial for EAA during the last 4 weeks or not beyond the time of 4 
half-lives of the medication used. In the unlikely event a subject is already in another clinical 
study but not for EAA, that study must be stopped and the subject may be treated 
according to this protocol; a latency time between the two studies does not appear 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
18 of 51 
 
reasonable, as acute intervention is necessary for EAA. Treatment may be best done in the 
frame work of this protocol. 
 
3.6.3 Withdrawal criteria 
Subjects can withdraw their consent at their own request without given reasons at all time during 
the trial. This should be without disadvantages for the subject. However the investigator should try 
to perform a final visit to get concluding findings of investigation. 
Subjects may be withdrawn from the trial for the following reasons 
 
At their own request or at request of the legal representative 
 
If, in the investigator’s opinion, continuation of the trial would be detrimental to the subject’s 
well-being 
 
If there occur major side effects of the study medication, which make it irresponsible to 
continue with the study medication. 
 
If the patient’s condition deteriorates in a way, that an intensification of the therapy is 
necessary and additional open steroid treatment is not sufficient to alleviate the condition. 
 
For women, if it becomes known that the subject is pregnant. 
 
The investigator decides about withdrawal of subjects from the clinical trial in case of occurrence of 
criteria mentioned above. 
In all cases, the reason for withdrawal must be recorded in the CRF and in the subject’s medical 
records. In case of withdrawal of a subject at his/her own request, as far as possible the reason 
should be asked for and documented. The subject must be followed up and as far as possible, all 
examinations scheduled for the final trial day should be performed and documented.  
All on-going serious adverse events of withdrawn subjects have to be followed up see 6.2.1.3. 
Withdrawn subjects will not be replaced.  
3.6.4 Premature closure of the clinical trial 
The following reasons the whole trial may be discontinued at the discretion of the sponsor: 
• 
New risks for subjects become known. 
• 
Inefficacy of the trial medication becomes evident. 
• 
Occurrence of AEs unknown to date in respect of their nature, severity, and duration or the 
 
unexpected increase in the incidence of known AEs. 
• 
Medical or ethical reasons affecting disadvantageous the continued performance of the trial. 
 
The ethic committees (EC) and the competent authority must then be informed. Should the trial be 
closed prematurely, all trial material must be returned to or fetched by the monitor. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
19 of 51 
 
 
4. TRIAL TREATMENTS 
4.1 Identification and elimination of EAA Allergens 
A) Identification of possible allergens with the following questions (shortly after diagnosis has been 
made): 
Yes 
No 
Comment 
Birds or other pets at home or in the garden? 
 
 
 
O 
O 
 
Bird cage/chicken house/pigeon loft at home or in garden? 
 
O 
O 
Down feathers in bed/clothing? 
 
 
 
 
 
O 
O 
Fungi at home? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O 
O 
Humid stonework, wallpaper, furnishing or carpet?  
 
 
O 
O 
Water container/tabletop fountain/swimming pool/whirlpool at home? 
O 
O 
Contact to hay/straw/feed grain? 
 
 
 
 
 
O 
O 
Air condition at home? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O 
O 
Potted plants at home? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O 
O 
Contact to organic waste or compost? 
 
 
 
 
O 
O 
 
A ground plan of house and garden has to be drawn together with the patient or his parents with 
marking the information asked above; please send this plan to the study center. 
 
 
B) High quality and standardized serological allergen/precipitin identification in experienced labs, 
e.g. Prof. Behr, Internal Medicine, Klinikum Großhadern, LMU or Prof. Sennekamp, Bonn. 
Elimination of antigen (shortly after diagnosis has been made): 
 
- 
If birds or other pets at home  
 give them away, also the birdcage 
 cleaning of all tissues (i.e. carpet, curtains etc.) 
- 
elimination of down feathers in bed/clothing 
- 
no water container/nebulizer 
- 
no swimming pool, whirlpool, tabletop fountain 
- 
avoid contact to hay, straw, feed grain 
- 
fungi: 
 humidity in room air < 65% 
 daily forced ventilation of the rooms (open window wide and short time) 
 elimination of contaminated wallpaper, furnishing and carpet 
 humid stonework -> repair if possible 
 
C) Control by a site visit to determine independently that elimination of antigen was successful 
(Trial day 56 (49 - 63), at home) 
If elimination was not successful: repeat consultation and education (issue 1. and 2.). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes 
No 
Comment 
Has the antigen identified above been eliminated successfully? O 
O 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
20 of 51 
 
4.2 Investigational treatments 
4.2.1 General information about investigational medicinal product (IMP) 
International nonproprietary name (INN): prednisolone 
 
Formulation: hard capsules (capsules with tablets)  
Manufacturer: Pharmacy University Medical Center Mainz 
 
Comparative Product (Placebo) 
Generic name: Placebo (capsules with placebo tablets) 
 
Formulation: hard capsules  
Manufacturer: Pharmacy department University Medical Center Mainz 
4.2.2 Therapeutic effects 
Prednisolone is a synthetic corticosteroid, which is mainly used as a non-specific anti-inflammatory 
and immunosuppressive drug. It modifies the body’s immune response to diverse stimuli. As 
Prednisolone is an analogue of the hormone hydrocortisone it may cause dose – and time-
dependent various metabolic effects. Prednisolone is indicated in the treatment of various 
conditions such as for example rheumatic diseases, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, allergic 
or hematological diseases. In pneumology it is used in asthma therapy as well as in many other 
pulmonary diseases, including interstitial lung diseases. 
4.2.3 Known side effects 
Side effects 
Common adverse reactions for corticosteroids include fluid retention, alteration in glucose 
tolerance, elevation in blood pressure, behavioural and mood changes, increased appetite and 
weight gain. 
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylactoid reaction, anaphylaxis, angioedema 
Cardiovascular: Bradycardia, cardiac arrest, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac enlargement, circulatory 
collapse, congestive heart failure, fat embolism, hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 
premature infants, myocardial rupture following recent myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, 
syncope, tachycardia, thromboembolism, thrombophlebitis, vasculitis 
Dermatologic: Acne, allergic dermatitis, cutaneous and subcutaneous atrophy, dry scalp, edema, 
facial erythema, hyper or hypo-pigmentation, impaired wound healing, increased sweating, 
petechiae and ecchymoses, rash, sterile abscess, striae, suppressed reactions to skin tests, thin 
fragile skin, thinning scalp hair, urticaria 
Endocrine: Abnormal fat deposits, decreased carbohydrate tolerance, development of Cushingoid 
state, hirsutism, manifestations of latent diabetes mellitus and increased requirements for insulin or 
oral hypoglycemic agents in diabetics, menstrual irregularities, moon facies, secondary 
adrenocortical and pituitary unresponsiveness (particularly in times of stress, as in trauma, surgery 
or illness), suppression of growth in children 
Fluid and Electrolyte Disturbances: Fluid retention, potassium loss, hypertension, hypokalemic 
alkalosis, sodium retention 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
21 of 51 
 
Gastrointestinal: Abdominal distention, elevation in serum liver enzymes levels (usually reversible 
upon discontinuation), hepatomegaly hiccups, malaise, nausea, pancreatitis, peptic ulcer with 
possible perforation and and hemorrhage, ulcerative esophagitis 
General: Increased appetite and weight gain 
Metabolic: Negative nitrogen balance due to protein catabolism 
Musculoskeletal: Aseptic necrosis of femoral and humeral heads, charcot-like arthropathy, loss of 
muscle mass, muscle weakness, osteoporosis, pathologic fracture of long bones, steroid 
myopathy, tendon rupture, vertebral compression fractures 
Neurological: Arachnoiditis, convulsions, depression, emotional instability, euphoria, headache, 
increased intracranial pressure with papilledema (pseudo-tumor cerebri) usually following 
discontinuation of treatment, insomnia, meningitis, mood swings, neuritis, neuropathy, 
paraparesis/paraplegia, paresthesia, personality changes, sensory disturbances, vertigo 
Ophthalmic: Exophthalmos, glaucoma, increased intraocular pressure, and posterior subcapsular 
cataracts 
Reproductive: Alteration in motility and number of spermatozoa 
 
Drug interactions 
 
Aminoglutethimide: Aminoglutethimide may lead to loss of corticosteroid-induced adrenal 
suppression. 
 
Amphotericin B: There have been cases reported in which concomitant use of 
Amphotericin B and hydrocortisone was followed by cardiac enlargement and congestive 
heart failure (see also Potassium depleting agents). 
 
Anticholinesterase agents: Concomitant use of anticholinesterase agents and 
corticosteroids may produce severe weakness in patients with myasthenia gravis. If 
possible, anticholinesterase agents should be withdrawn at least 24 hours before initiating 
corticosteroid therapy. 
 
Anticoagulant agents: Coadministration of corticosteroids and warfarin usually results in 
inhibition of response to warfarin, although there have been some conflicting reports. 
Therefore, coagulation indices should be monitored frequently to maintain the desired 
anticoagulant effect. 
 
Antidiabetic agents: Antidiabetic agents: Because corticosteroids may increase blood 
glucose concentrations, dosage adjustments of antidiabetic agents may be 
requiredAntitubercular drugs: Serum concentrations of isoniazid may be decreased. 
 
CYP 3A4 inducers (e.g., barbiturates, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and rifampin): 
Drugs such as barbiturates, phenytoin, ephedrine, and rifampin, which induce hepatic 
microsomal drug metabolizing enzyme activity may enhance metabolism of prednisolone 
and require that the dosage prednisolone be increased. 
 
CYP 3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, macrolide antibiotics): Ketoconazole has been 
reported to decrease the metabolism of certain corticosteroids by up to 60% leading to an 
increased risk of corticosteroid side effects. 
 
Cholestyramine: Cholestyramine may increase the clearance of corticosteroids. 
 
Cyclosporine: Increased activity of both cyclosporine and corticosteroids may occur when 
the two are used concurrently. Convulsions have been reported with concurrent use. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
22 of 51 
 
 
Digitalis: Patients on digitalis glycosides may be at increased risk of arrhythmias due to 
hypokalemia. 
 
Estrogens, including oral contraceptives: Estrogens may decrease the hepatic 
metabolism of certain corticosteroids thereby increasing their effect. 
 
NSAlDs including aspirin and salicylates: Concomitant use of aspirin or other non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and corticosteroids increases the risk of gastrointestinal 
side effects. Aspirin should be used cautiously in conjunction with corticosteroids in 
hypoprothrombinemia. The clearance of salicylates may be increased with concurrent use 
of corticosteroids. 
 
Potassium depleting agents (e.g., diuretics, Amphotericin B): When corticosteroids are 
administered concomitantly with potassium-depleting agents, patients should be observed 
closely for development of hypokalemia. 
 
Skin tests: Corticosteroids may suppress reactions to skin tests. 
 
Toxoids and live or inactivated vaccines: Due to inhibition of antibody response, patients 
on prolonged corticosteroid therapy may exhibit a diminished response to toxoids and live 
or inactivated vaccines. Corticosteroids may also potentiate the replication of some 
organisms contained in live attenuated vaccines 
Warnings and precautions 
 
Alterations in Endocrine Function 
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression, Cushing's syndrome, and hyperglycemia. 
Monitor patients for these conditions with chronic use. 
Corticosteroids can produce reversible HPA axis suppression with the potential for 
glucocorticosteroid insufficiency after withdrawal of treatment. Drug induced secondary 
adrenocortical insufficiency may be minimized by gradual reduction of dosage. This type of relative 
insufficiency may persist for months after discontinuation of therapy; therefore, in any situation of 
stress occurring during that period, hormone therapy should be reinstituted. 
Since mineralocorticoid secretion may be impaired, salt and/or a mineralocorticoid should be 
administered concurrently. Mineralocorticoid supplementation is of particular importance in infancy. 
Metabolic clearance of corticosteroids is decreased in hypothyroid patients and increased in 
hyperthyroid patients. Changes in thyroid status of the patient may necessitate adjustment in 
dosage. 
With the doses suggested in this trial such alterations in endocrine function are not expected to 
occur. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
23 of 51 
 
Increased Risks Related to Infections 
Corticosteroids may increase the risks related to infections with any pathogen, including viral, 
bacterial, fungal, protozoan, or helminthic infections. The degree to which the dose, route and 
duration of corticosteroid administration correlates with the specific risks of infection is not well 
characterized, however, with increasing doses of corticosteroids, the rate of occurrence of 
infectious complications increases. 
Corticosteroids may mask some signs of infection and may reduce resistance to new infections. 
Corticosteroids may exacerbate infections and increase risk of disseminated infection.  
The use of prednisolone in active tuberculosis should be restricted to those cases of fulminating or 
disseminated tuberculosis in which the corticosteroid is used for the management of the disease in 
conjunction with an appropriate antituberculous regimen. 
Chickenpox and measles can have a more serious or even fatal course in non-immune children or 
adults on corticosteroids. In children or adults who have not had these diseases, particular care 
should be taken to avoid exposure. If a patient is exposed to chickenpox, prophylaxis with varicella 
zoster immune globulin (VZIG) may be indicated. If patient is exposed to measles, prophylaxis with 
pooled intramuscular immunoglobulin (IG) may be indicated. If chickenpox develops, treatment 
with antiviral agents may be considered. 
Corticosteroids should be used with great care in patients with known or suspected Strongyloides 
(threadworm) infestation. In such patients, corticosteroid-induced immunosuppression may lead to 
Strongyloides hyperinfection and dissemination with widespread larval migration, often 
accompanied by severe enterocolitis and potentially fatal gram-negative septicemia. 
Corticosteroids may exacerbate systemic fungal infections and therefore should not be used in the 
presence of such infections unless they are needed to control drug reactions. 
Corticosteroids may increase risk of reactivation or exacerbation of latent infection.  
If corticosteroids are indicated in patients with latent tuberculosis or tuberculin reactivity, close 
observation is necessary as reactivation of the disease may occur. During prolonged corticosteroid 
therapy, these patients should receive chemoprophylaxis. 
Corticosteroids may activate latent amebiasis. Therefore, it is recommended that latent or active 
amebiasis be ruled out before initiating corticosteroid therapy in any patient who has spent time in 
the tropics or in any patient with unexplained diarrhoea. 
Corticosteroids should not be used in cerebral malaria. 
Alterations in Cardiovascular/Renal Function 
Corticosteroids can cause elevation of blood pressure, salt and water retention, and increased 
excretion of potassium and calcium. These effects are less likely to occur with the synthetic 
derivatives except when used in large doses. Dietary salt restriction and potassium 
supplementation may be necessary. These agents should be used with caution in patients with 
hypertension, congestive heart failure, or renal insufficiency. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
24 of 51 
 
Literature reports suggest an association between use of corticosteroids and left ventricular free 
wall rupture after a recent myocardial infarction; therefore, therapy with corticosteroids should be 
used with caution in these patients. 
Use in Patients with Gastrointestinal Disorders 
There is an increased risk of gastrointestinal perforation in patients with certain GI disorders. Signs 
of GI perforation, such as peritoneal irritation, may be masked in patients receiving corticosteroids. 
Corticosteroids should be used with caution if there is a probability of impending perforation, 
abscess or other pyogenic infections; diverticulitis; fresh intestinal anastomoses; and active or 
latent peptic ulcer. 
Behavioral and Mood Disturbances 
Corticosteroid use may be associated with central nervous system effects ranging from euphoria, 
insomnia, mood swings, personality changes, and severe depression, to frank psychotic 
manifestations. Also, existing emotional instability or psychotic tendencies may be aggravated by 
corticosteroids. 
Decrease in Bone Density 
Corticosteroids decrease bone formation and increase bone resorption both through their effect on 
calcium regulation (i.e., decreasing absorption and increasing excretion) and inhibition of 
osteoblast function. This, together with a decrease in the protein matrix of the bone secondary to 
an increase in protein catabolism, and reduced sex hormone production, may lead to inhibition of 
bone growth in children and adolescents and the development of osteoporosis at any age. Special 
consideration should be given to patients at increased risk of osteoporosis (i.e., postmenopausal 
women) before initiating corticosteroid therapy and bone density should be monitored in patients 
on long-term corticosteroid therapy. 
Ophthalmic Effects 
Prolonged use of corticosteroids may produce posterior subcapsular cataracts, glaucoma with 
possible damage to the optic nerves, and may enhance the establishment of secondary ocular 
infections due to fungi or viruses. The use of oral corticosteroids is not recommended in the 
treatment of optic neuritis and may lead to an increase in the risk of new episodes. Intraocular 
pressure may become elevated in some individuals. If steroid therapy is continued for more than 6 
weeks, intraocular pressure should be monitored. 
Patients with Ocular Herpes Simplex 
Corticosteroids should be used cautiously in patients with ocular herpes simplex because of 
possible corneal perforation. Corticosteroids should not be used in active ocular herpes simplex. 
Vaccination 
Administration of live or live attenuated vaccines is contraindicated in patients receiving 
immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids. Killed or inactivated vaccines may be administered, 
however, the response to such vaccines cannot be predicted. Immunization procedures may be 
undertaken in patients who are receiving corticosteroids as replacement therapy, e.g., for 
Addison's disease. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
25 of 51 
 
While on corticosteroid therapy, patients should not be vaccinated against smallpox. Other 
immunization procedures should not be undertaken in patients who are on corticosteroids, 
especially on high dose, because of possible hazards of neurological complications and a lack of 
antibody response. 
Effect on Growth and Development 
Long-term use of corticosteroids can have negative effects on growth and development in children. 
Growth and development of pediatric patients on prolonged corticosteroid therapy should be 
carefully monitored. 
Use in Pregnancy 
Prednisolone can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Human and animal 
studies suggest that use of corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with 
an increased risk of orofacial clefts, intrauterine growth restriction and decreased birth weight. If 
this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while using this drug, the 
patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the foetus. 
Neuromuscular Effects 
An acute myopathy has been observed with the use of high doses of corticosteroids, most often 
occurring in patients with disorders of neuromuscular transmission (e.g., myasthenia gravis), or in 
patients receiving concomitant therapy with neuromuscular blocking drugs (e.g., pancuronium). 
This acute myopathy is generalized, may involve ocular and respiratory muscles, and may result in 
quadriparesis. Elevation of creatine kinase may occur. Clinical improvement or recovery after 
stopping corticosteroids may require weeks to years. 
Kaposi's Sarcoma 
Kaposi's sarcoma has been reported to occur in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy, most 
often for chronic conditions. Discontinuation of corticosteroids may result in clinical improvement. 
4.2.4 Dosage schedule 
- 
Steroid pulse as short term common treatment for EAA, not used as trial medication; 
will be received by all subjects:  
methylprednisolone 10 mg/kg bw/d (max. 1g) i.v. over 1h for 3 days.  
 
Before starting the steroid pulse, serum levels for potassium have to be checked, if 
< 3,5 mmol/l substitute oral potassium during d1 through d3 of the pulse. If there are 
any signs of an acute intervening infection (e.g. fever, other organ involvement, e.g. 
urinary tract infection or otitis, etc) the steroid pulse must not be administered. 
 
- 
Oral prednisolone as trial medication:  
Anticipated dose: 
first month after steroid pulse 0.5 mg/kg bw/d, second month 0.25 mg/kg bw/d, and third 
month 0.125 mg/kg bw/d in a single morning dose 
Individual capsules will be prepared using rounded dose (see 14. Appendix dosage 
table) 
 
4.2.5 Overdose instructions 
The effects of accidental ingestion of large quantities of prednisolone over a very short period of 
time have not been reported. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
26 of 51 
 
 
4.2.6 Treatment assignment 
The trial medication will be administered only to subjects included in this trial.  
Subjects withdrawn from the trial retain their identification codes (e.g. randomization number). New 
subjects will always receive a new identification code. 
4.2.7 Treatment after the end of the trial 
Treatment after the end of the trial is at the discretion of the investigator. 
4.2.8 Packaging and labelling 
The trial medication will be labelled according to local regulations.  
The trial medication will be packed by pharmacy university medical centre Mainz. 
Statements will be printed on the label(s) as required by local regulations. 
4.2.9 Drug storage, supplies and accountability 
The investigator will take inventory and acknowledge the receipt of all shipments of the trial 
medication. All trial medication must be kept in a locked area with access restricted to designated 
trial staff.  
The trial medication must be dryly stored in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.  
The investigator will also keep accurate records of the quantities of trial medication dispensed, 
used, and returned by each subject on the drug accountability form. 
The site monitor will periodically check the supplies of trial medication held by the investigator to 
verify the correct accountability of all trial medication used. At the end of the trial, all unused trial 
medication and all medication containers will be completely returned to pharmacy Mainz in case no 
other procedure is agreed.  
It will be assured that a final drug accountability report is prepared and maintained by the 
investigator. 
4.2.10 Procedures for monitoring subject compliance 
Trial medication will be dispensed to the subjects by the investigator.  
Subjects will be instructed to bring all trial medication to the trial site at every visit (including all 
empty packages and unused trial medication), compliance will be assessed. Details will be 
recorded in the CRF and on the drug accountability form in the investigator site file. 
4.2.11 Medication intake 
Medication intake should take place with the meals or shortly after the meals. Whole capsules will 
be taken with liquid (50-100ml water, tea or apple juice). 
4.3 Not permitted medication 
The following concomitant treatments are not permitted during the trial: 
Other systemic glucocorticosteroids as concomitant treatments are not permitted during the trial. 
However their usage as rescue therapy by the attending physician is possible and must be 
documented appropriately. Inhaled steroids are left unchanged if patient is currently on; if off, do 
not introduce them in the following 6 months. 
 
For interactions with other medication and warnings please see 4.2.3. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
27 of 51 
 
4.4 Open rescue treatment if lung function does not improve 
 
With removal of the allergen by hospitalization and cleaning of the home from offending allergenes 
which is usually done during the initial hospital stay, and after application of the 3d steroid boost to 
all subjects, a steady improvement in lung function is anticipated. This will be closely monitored by 
monthly lung function measurements in the first 3 months and at 6 months or additional visits at the 
discretion of the treating physician. FVC (% predicted) is expected to increase from visit to visit.  
 
If this is not the case, continuing allergen exposure must be considered and a re-evaluation of the 
allergen elimination has to be performed.  
 
If there is no appropriate improvement of lung function despite appropriate allergen elimination, an 
open rescue treatment with oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg bw/d) should be given till the patient’s 
lung function improves. An alternative may be pulsed methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg bw/d). Extra 
visits at the discretion of the treating physician may be scheduled. 
 
If the result of the oral prednisolone is not satisfying, re-evaluation of the diagnosis and possibly 
de-blinding of the study medication should be considered. Alternative medication, including steroid 
saving drugs may be considered. 
 
All rescue treatments necessary will be recorded and the cumulative amount of steroids necessary 
used as a secondary outcome variable.  
 
 
5. TRIAL SCHEDULE 
 
Detailed trial schedule is given in table 1, page 7. All trial visits and measurements are part of the 
routine investigation and follow up of children with EAA, except the following: 
 
Screening (Inpatient, day -21 to -2) 
The following parameters have to be measured, data has to be collected and documented:  
 
Patient information and informed consent with the use of the consent form for each 
age group 
 
Inclusion/exclusion criteria have to be checked 
Randomization must occur directly after consent to the study is given, at least 1 
week before the first dose of oral prednisolone; this is necessary to allow for 
preparation and shipping of the study medication. 
Baseline (Inpatient, day -4 to -2) 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of Quality-
of-life 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of health 
economics 
 
Discharge (Inpatient, day 1) 
 
Trial medication will be provided to the patient 
 
Personal contact (day 56 (35-74)) 
Expert allergen consultation and education at home with control, if the elimination of 
allergen has been successful 
 
Telephone contact (day 126 (119, 133)) 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
28 of 51 
 
 
Vital signs (Height, weight, RR, pulse, temperature), measured by the parents 
 
Documentation of adverse events 
 
Visit 3 (day 84 (74-94) 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of Quality-
of-life 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of health 
economics 
 
Visit 4 (day 168 (148-188) 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of Quality-
of-life 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of health 
economics  
 
End of trial (final visit) 
 
Long term follow up (annually) 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of Health 
economics 
 
The patient or his parents should fill out the questionnaire for evaluation of Quality-
of-life 
 
Build a cohort into adulthood 
 
 
6. TRIAL METHODS 
6.1 Assessment of efficacy  
The primary analysis variable is the improvement in FVC (difference after 6 months and baseline). 
The 6 months and baseline FVC values will be given in percent deviation from the norm values 
tabulated by Quanjer PH., et al. 2013. FVC will be measured by performing a standardized 
spirometry with defined quality criteria according to the ATS/ERS guideline. Therefore a standard 
operation procedure will be provided. 
For the evaluation of the quality of life a standardized questionnaire, the “PedsQL”, will be used.  
 
6.2 Assessment of safety  
6.2.1 Adverse events 
6.2.1.1 
Definitions 
Adverse Event (AE) 
According to GCP, an adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a 
subject treated with a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal 
relationship with this treatment. An AE can be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an 
abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a 
medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) 
product. 
 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
29 of 51 
 
An AE may be: 
 a new symptom or a new diagnosis 
 a new medical condition or an accident 
 a change in laboratory parameters 
 an intercurrent illness or accident 
 worsening of a medical condition/diseases existing before the start of the clinical trial 
 recurrence of a disease 
 an increase in frequency or intensity of episodic diseases. 
 
Surgical procedures themselves are not AEs; they are therapeutic measures for conditions that 
require surgery. The condition for which the surgery is required may be an AE. Planned surgical 
measures permitted by the clinical trial protocol and the condition(s) leading to these measures are 
not AEs, if the condition leading to the measure was present before inclusion in the trial. In the 
latter case the condition should be reported as medical history. 
Change in laboratory parameters: The criteria for determining whether an abnormal test finding 
should be reported as an adverse event are as follows: 
 Test result is associated with accompanying symptoms, and/or 
 Test result requires additional diagnostic testing or medical/surgical intervention, and/or 
 Test result leads to a change in trial dosing outside of protocol-stipulated dose adjustments, or 
discontinuation from the trial, significant additional concomitant drug treatment, or other therapy, 
and/or 
 Test result is considered to be an adverse event by the investigator or sponsor. 
 Progression of EAA under treatment should not be reported as an adverse event. However, if 
EAA leads to a fatal outcome during the trial or within the safety reporting period, then disease 
progression should be reported as an adverse event and as a serious adverse event with 
outcome “death”. 
 
Serious adverse event (SAE) 
A serious adverse event (SAE) is one that at any dose (including overdose): 
 results in death 
 is life-threatening1 
 requires subject hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization² 
 results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity3 or 
 is a congenital anomaly/birth defect 
 is an important medical event4. 
Comment: 
Death is an outcome of an event. The event that resulted in death should be recorded and reported 
as an SAE. 
1“Life-threatening” means that the subject was at immediate risk of death at the time of the serious 
adverse event; it does not refer to a serious adverse event that hypothetically might have caused 
death if it were more severe. 
2If the admission is pre-planned (i.e., elective or scheduled surgery arranged prior to start of the 
trial) or not associated with an adverse event (e.g., social hospitalisation for purpose) or results in a 
hospital stay less than 12 hours, the serious criterion “hospitalisation” is not fulfilled. However, it 
should be noted that invasive treatment during a hospitalisation may fulfil the criteria of “medically 
important” and may be reportable as a serious adverse event dependent on clinical judgement. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
30 of 51 
 
An inpatient rehabilitation program per se does not fulfil the seriousness criterion “hospitalization”. 
In this case the investigator should evaluate carefully whether the reason for the inpatient 
rehabilitation program has to be documented as an AE/SAE. 
3“Persistent or significant disability or incapacity” means that there is a substantial disruption of a 
person’s ability to carry out normal life functions. The irreversible injury of an organ function (e.g., 
paresis, diabetes, cardiac arrhythmia) fulfils this criterion. 
4Medical and scientific judgement should be exercised in deciding whether expedited reporting is 
appropriate in situations where none of the outcomes listed above occurred. Important medical 
events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may 
jeopardize the subject or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in 
the definition above should also usually be considered serious. Examples of such events include 
allergic bronchospasm requiring intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home, 
convulsions that do not result in subject hospitalization, or the development of drug dependency or 
drug abuse. A diagnosis of cancer during the course of a treatment should be considered as 
medically important.  
Clarification of the onset and end date of AEs and SAEs 
The onset date of the AE is defined as the onset of signs and symptoms or a change from 
baseline. The onset date of the SAE is defined as the date the signs and symptoms/diagnosis 
became serious, i.e., met at least one of the ICH criteria for seriousness.  
The end date of the AE is defined as the date when the symptoms resolve, or the event is 
considered stable. The end date of the SAE is defined as the time the seriousness criteria are no 
longer applicable. 
The end date of the SAE must not be later than the end date of the corresponding AE. 
AEs and SAEs that are on-going at the time of death are considered not resolved or resolving.  
 
Clarification of the difference in meaning between "serious" and "severe": 
The terms “serious” and “severe” are not synonymous but are often used interchangeably. The 
term ‘severe’ is often used to describe the intensity (severity) of a specific event; the event itself, 
however, may be of relatively minor significance (such as severe headache). This is not the same 
as “serious”, which is based on subject/event outcome or action criteria usually associated with 
events that pose a threat to a subject’s life or functioning. Seriousness (not severity) serves as a 
guide for defining regulatory reporting obligations.” 
 
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) 
A SUSAR is every SAE with an at least possible relationship to the investigational medicinal 
product which is unexpected. 
An unexpected serious adverse reaction is any adverse reaction, the nature or severity of which is 
not consistent with the applicable product information (i.e., the Investigator’s Brochure or the 
current SmPC).  
6.2.1.2 
Assessment of AEs by investigator  
Subjects must be carefully monitored for adverse events by the investigator. The intensity of the 
adverse events and the causal relation to trial medication and/or procedures are to be assessed. 
Intensity/Severity 
The intensity of an AE will be assessed by the investigator as follows: 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
31 of 51 
 
Mild: 
 
Temporary event which is tolerated well by the subject and does not interfere with 
 
 
normal daily activities. 
Moderate: 
Event which results in discomfort for the subject and impairs his/her normal activity. 
Severe: 
Event which results in substantial impairment of normal activities of subject. 
 
If the event is serious, the severity reported in the adverse event must be consistent with the 
severity included in the adverse event report. 
 
 
Causal relation to trial medication/procedures 
The assessment of the relationship of an adverse event to the administration of study drug is a 
clinical decision based on all available information at the time of the documentation. Factors to be 
considered in assessing the relationship of the adverse event to study drug include: 
• The temporal sequence from drug administration: The investigator has to consider, if the event 
occurred before first intake of study medication or long time after last intake. Additionally the length 
of time from drug exposure to event should be evaluated in the clinical context of the event. 
• Recovery on discontinuation (de-challenge), recurrence on reintroduction (re-challenge): 
Subject’s response after drug discontinuation (de-challenge) or subjects response after drug re-
introduction (re-challenge) should be considered in the view of the usual clinical course of the 
event in question. 
• Underlying, concomitant, intercurrent diseases: Each report should be evaluated in the context of 
the natural history and course of the disease being treated and any other disease the subject may 
have. 
• Concomitant medication or treatment: The other drugs the subject is taking or the treatment the 
subject receives should be examined to determine whether any of them may be suspected to 
cause the event in question. 
Positive causal relationship: 
An assessment of ‘related‘ implies a reasonable possibility of a causal relationship between the 
event and the investigational medicinal product (IMP).  
This means that there are facts (evidence) or arguments to suggest a causal relationship, such as: 
 
A close temporal relationship 
 
A common drug reaction to the IMP  
 
No plausible alternative cause 
Negative causal relationship: 
An assessment of ‘not related‘ means that there is no reasonable possibility of a causal 
relationship between the event and the investigational medicinal product. 
This includes for example:  
 
Another cause of the adverse event is more plausible  
 
A temporal sequence cannot be established with the onset of the adverse event and 
administration of the study treatment 
 
A causal relationship is considered biologically implausible. 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
32 of 51 
 
6.2.1.3 
Period of observation 
In this trial, the period of observation for collection of adverse events extends from first intake of 
study medication (day 0) up to visit 3 (final visit after 6 months).  
 
If the investigator detects a serious adverse event in a trial subject after the end of the period of 
observation, and considers the event possibly related to the prior trial, he should contact the 
sponsor to determine how the adverse event should be documented and reported. 
6.2.1.4 
Documentation of AEs and Follow up 
All AEs (whether serious or not) reported by the subject or detected by the investigator will be 
documented on the appropriate pages of the case report form (CRF). AEs must also be 
documented in the subject’s medical records.  
If the adverse event is serious (see Section 6.2.1.1), the investigator must complete, in addition to 
the “Adverse Event Page”, a “Serious Adverse Event Form” at the time the serious adverse event 
is detected. 
Every attempt should be made to describe the adverse event in terms of a diagnosis. If a clear 
diagnosis has been made, individual signs and symptoms will not be recorded unless they 
represent atypical or extreme manifestations of the diagnosis, in which case they should be 
reported as separate events. If a clear diagnosis cannot be established, each sign and symptom 
must be recorded individually. 
All subjects who have adverse events, whether considered associated with the use of the 
investigational products or not, must be monitored to determine the outcome. The clinical course of 
the adverse event will be followed up according to accepted standards of medical practice, even 
after the end of the period of observation, until a satisfactory explanation is found or the 
investigator considers it medically justifiable to terminate follow-up, but no longer than 90 days 
after the end of the trial. 
Should the adverse event result in death, a full pathologist’s report should be supplied, if possible. 
6.2.1.5 
Immediate reporting of SAEs by investigator 
SAEs must immediately (within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness) be reported to: 
IZKS Mainz 
Langenbeckstr 2 
55131 Mainz 
FAX 0049 6131/17-9916 
The initial SAE Report should be as complete as possible including the essential details of 
subject’s identification (screening number, random number), the serious adverse event (medical 
term, diagnosis), the trial medication and the assessment of the causal relationship between the 
event and the trial medication. The SAE report must be reviewed and signed by the investigator.  
The investigator should provide related additional information on the clinical course and the 
outcome of each SAE as soon as possible (Follow up report). 
The “Serious Adverse Event Form” is provided in the Investigator Site File. 
 
Worsening of a sign or symptom of the condition under treatment will normally be measured by 
efficacy parameters. However, if the outcome fulfils the definition of “serious adverse event”, it 
must be reported as such.  
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
33 of 51 
 
6.2.1.6 
Immediate Reporting of pregnancy by investigator 
Any pregnancy diagnosed in a female subject during treatment with the investigational product 
must be reported immediately using the “Pregnancy Reporting Form” to: 
IZKS Mainz 
Langenbeckstr 2 
55131 Mainz 
FAX 0049 6131/17-9916 
 
Pregnancy occuring during the clinical trial, although not considered a SAE, must be reported 
within the same timelines as a serious adverse event. The outcome of a pregnancy should be 
followed up carefully and abnormal outcome of mother or child should be reported if any. 
6.2.1.7 
Documentation of Abuse, Misuse, Overdose and Medication Error 
All special events such as study medication abuse, misuse, overdose and medication errors 
including dilution errors and infusion rate errors have to be documented in the subject’s CRF and 
source documents. If any abuse, misuse, overdose, or medication errors lead to an adverse event, 
then the event has to be documented and reported as AE/SAE. 
 
6.2.2 Other safety data 
Routine physical examination and laboratory determination as specified above at study visits.  
 
6.2.2.1 
Safety evaluation and Reporting by sponsor 
The sponsor will ensure that all legal reporting requirements are met. According to GCP the 
sponsor is responsible for the continuous safety evaluation of the investigational product(s) and the 
clinical trial. 
The sponsor Safety Management of IZKS Mainz on behalf of the sponsor will conduct the 
management of SAEs and the expedited reporting as required by German Drug Law (AMG) and 
GCP regulation (GCP-V). Suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) and safety 
issues as defined by GCP-V are determined for expedited reporting: The competent authority and 
the ethics committees should be notified as soon as possible but not later than 15 calendar days if 
the event is non-fatal and 7 calendar days if it was fatal.  
All investigators will be informed within the same timeframe. 
The marketing authorization holder of the IMP should be informed. 
Work flow and procedures concerning SAE management will be described in a separate 
document. 
During the clinical trial the Safety Management of IZKS Mainz on behalf of the sponsor will submit 
the Development Safety Update Report (DSUR) including a list of all serious adverse reactions to 
the ethics committee(s), the competent authority (BfArM) and DMC once a year. 
6.2.2.2 
Emergency procedures 
During and following a subject’s participation in the trial, the investigator should ensure that 
adequate medical care is provided to a subject for any AEs including clinically significant laboratory 
values. The investigator should inform a subject when medical care is needed for intercurrent 
illness(es) of which the investigator becomes aware. 
 
Emergency Unblinding: 
If it is medically imperative to know what trial medication the subject is receiving, the investigator or 
authorized person should open the sealed unblinding codes. The investigator or the person who 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
34 of 51 
 
breaks the blind must record the date and the reasons for doing so in the CRF, in the subject’s 
medical record and on the unblinding codes.  
6.3 Other assessments 
6.3.1 Prior and concomitant illnesses 
Relevant additional illnesses present at the time of informed consent are regarded as concomitant 
illnesses and will be documented on the appropriate pages of the case report form (CRF). 
6.3.2 Prior and concomitant treatments 
Relevant additional treatments administered to the subjects on entry to the trial or at any time 
during the trial are regarded as concomitant treatments and must be documented on the 
appropriate pages of the CRF. 
For example in case of insufficient improvement of the symptoms, glucocorticoids may be 
administered to the subject and again searched for other sources of the allergen.  
7. STATISTICS  
Details of the statistical analysis of the data collected in this trial will be documented in a Statistical 
Analysis Plan (SAP) that will be generated by IZKS Mainz and finalized before closing the data 
base and prior to breaking the blind. The SAP is based on the protocol including all amendments. 
The document may modify the plans outlined in this protocol; however any major modifications of 
the primary endpoint definition and/or its analysis will also be reflected in a protocol amendment. 
Any deviation from the original statistical plan must be described and justified in the final report. 
The statistical analysis will be conducted by means of SAS®. 
7.1 Sample size 
Power calculations were based on a one sided level of significance of alpha=0.05. Regulatory 
guidelines suggest the use of a two-sided level of significance. However, it is extremely improbable 
that in the time frame of the study the prednisolone arm will be significantly worse than the placebo 
arm. Power calculations were performed by means of a t-test with a correlation to the baseline 
value of 0.4. With 40 patients evaluable per protocol the study will have a power of 58% to detect 
non-inferiority of the placebo arm versus the prednisolone arm with a non-inferiority bound of 7%. 
The power calculations were done by SAS, Version 9.2. 
7.2 Analysis populations 
All subjects who signed informed consent / were assigned a randomization number are considered 
as enrolled/randomized subjects, even if they did not receive any trial treatment.  
All subjects who received at least one dose of trial treatment and with at least one available post-
baseline assessment of the primary analysis variable, will be included in the Intention-to-treat (ITT) 
population. This population is the primary analysis population. Within ITT population analyses 
subjects will be assigned to the treatment to which they were randomized. 
The per protocol population are all subjects of the ITT population without any major protocol 
violation. This population is the primary analysis population. 
The safety population comprises all subjects who received at least one dose of trial treatment. In 
analyses of the safety population subjects will be assigned to the treatment which they actually 
received. 
The analysis populations will be defined prior to unblinding of the study. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
35 of 51 
 
7.3 Efficacy analyses 
 
Efficacy:  
The analyses will be specified more detailed in the statistical analysis plan (SAP). Descriptive 
statistics of qualitative data will consist of absolute and relative frequencies. For quantitative data 
the number of observations, mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum will be presented.  
The primary population for the analyses of efficacy is the randomized Population without major 
protocol violations.  
 
7.3.1 Definition and analysis of primary endpoint  
The primary analysis variable is the improvement in FVC (difference after 6 months and baseline). 
The 6 months and baseline FVC values will be given in percent deviation from the norm values 
tabulated by Quanjer PH., et al. 2013.  
A difference between the changes in placebo and active treatment is considered not significant if 
FVC differences are < 7%. The working hypothesis of the study is that the placebo is not inferior to 
the prednisolone intervention. 
The improvement in FVC will be compared between groups within an analysis of covariance 
(ANCOVA). Treatment will serve as a fixed factor and the baseline FVC value as a covariate. The 
primary analysis population will consist of all randomized patients without any major protocol 
violations. The two-sided 90% confidence interval for the treatment difference will be calculated. 
Sensitivity analyses will be performed by analyzing the same analysis model for all randomized 
patients. Additionally, the primary parameter will be analyzed by ANCOVA with additional terms for 
sex and height. Center effects will be explored by descriptive statistics. Missing values will not be 
replaced. 
If appropriate, a Bayessian analysis with a suited prior distribution will be considered. This will be 
specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP). 
7.3.2 Analysis of secondary endpoints 
All analysis of secondary endpoint will be interpreted purely exploratory. Descriptive statistics will 
be displayed for all  
 
- 
Response according to the primary analysis variable: Each patient will be classified as 
a responder or non-responder. A patient is considered as a responder, if the FVC value 
after 6 months is more than or equal to 93% of the norm values tabulated by Quanjer 
PH., et al. 2013 and if the patient did not take any glucocorticoid rescue medication. 
Responders will be analysed by a Chi-Square Test. 
- 
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC): Relative changes from Baseline after 3 months will be 
compared between groups by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment as a 
fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate.   
- 
Desaturation with standardized exercise test for children (O2 saturation), Borg scale: 
Relative changes from Baseline after 3 months and 6 months will be compared between 
groups by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment as a fixed effect and 
baseline value as a covariate. 
- 
Quality-of-life (PedsQL): Descriptive statistics and exploratory p-values 
- 
Health economics (EQ-5D): Health care costs and utility will be determined and 
combined with quality of life data. Afterwards they will be compared between treatment 
groups  
- 
Weight for Height, Open usage of rescue glucocorticosteroids (mg/kg/6 months): 
Descriptive statistics and exploratory p-values only 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
36 of 51 
 
7.3.3 Analysis of Subgroups 
If appropriate, subgroups will be defined in the SAP. 
7.3.4 Interim analyses 
No interim analyses are planned. 
7.4 Analysis of adverse events 
All summaries and listings of safety data will be performed for the safety population.  
Frequencies of subjects experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) will be displayed by body 
system and preferred term according to MedDRA terminology. Detailed information collected for 
each AE will include: A description of the event, duration, whether the AE was serious, intensity, 
relationship to trial drug, action taken, clinical outcome. Summary tables will present the number of 
subjects observed with AEs and corresponding percentages. Additional subcategories will be 
based on event intensity and relationship to trial drug.  
A subject listing of all AEs will be prepared. 
7.5 Analysis of clinical laboratory findings 
Listings will be prepared for each laboratory measure and will be structured to permit review of the 
data per subject as they progress on treatment. 
Summary tables will be prepared to examine the changes of laboratory measures over time. 
Additionally, shift tables will be provided to examine the changes of laboratory data from normal 
baseline to values outside the corresponding reference range during/after treatment. 
8. QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE  
8.1 Requirements for investigational sites and staff 
The investigator should be able to demonstrate (e.g. based on retrospective data) a potential for 
recruiting the required number of suitable subjects within the agreed recruitment period. 
The investigator should have sufficient time to properly conduct and complete the trial within the 
agreed trial period. 
The investigator should have available an adequate number of qualified staff and adequate 
facilities for the foreseen duration of the trial to conduct the trial properly and safely. 
The investigator should ensure that all persons assisting with the trial are adequately qualified, 
informed about the protocol, any amendments to the protocol, the trials treatments, and their trial-
related duties and functions. 
8.2 Direct entries 
Data entries be entered in the CRF as Direct, are listed in the Monitor Manual in the section source 
data control. 
8.3 Direct access to source data/documents  
The investigator/institution must permit trial-related monitoring and auditing, as well as inspections 
by the appropriate competent authority and Ethics committees, providing direct access to source 
data/documents (Confidentiality see 10.3). 
The subjects will be informed that representatives of the sponsor, independent ethics committee 
(IEC) or competent authority may inspect their medical records to verify the information collected, 
and that all personal information made available for inspection will be handled in strictest 
confidence and in accordance with local data protection laws. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
37 of 51 
 
8.4 Investigator site file and archiving 
The investigator will be provided with an investigator site file (ISF) at the start of the trial. The 
investigator will archive all trial data and relevant correspondence in the ISF. The ISF, all source 
data and all documents will be kept filed according to the requirements of the ICH-GCP guidelines 
after termination of the trial.  
 
After the end of the trial trial related documents e.g. trial master file (TMF) and CRFs will be stored 
in the archive of the sponsor. 
It is the responsibility of the investigator to ensure that the subject-identification sheets are stored 
for at least 15 years beyond the end of the clinical trial. All original subject files must be stored for 
the longest possible time permitted by the regulations at the hospital, research institute, or practice 
in question. If archiving can no longer be maintained at the site, the investigator will notify the 
sponsor. 
8.5 Monitoring 
Monitoring will be done by personal visits from a clinical monitor according to SOPs of the IZKS 
Mainz.  
Each site will be visited by the monitor at regular intervals to ensure compliance with the trial 
protocol, GCP and legal aspects. The monitor will review the entries into the eCRF for 
completeness and correctness and verify the entries on the basis of the source documents.  
The presence of correct informed consents will be checked for every subject.  
Details will be specified in the monitoring manual for this trial. 
The investigator must allow the monitor to look at all relevant documents and must provide support 
at all times to the monitor. 
By frequent communications (letters, telephone, fax), the monitor will ensure that the trial is 
conducted according to the protocol and regulatory requirements. 
8.6 Inspection by authority and audits 
Competent authority and by the sponsor authorised persons (auditor) may request access to all 
source documents, CRF, and other trial documentation in case of an inspection or audit. Direct 
access to these documents must be guaranteed by the investigator who must provide support at all 
times for these activities. Source data documents can be copied during inspection or audit in case 
the identity of the subject have been made unrecognizable. 
8.7 Audits  
No audits are planned for this trial. 
 
 
 
9. DATA MANAGEMENT 
 
The Central Information Office Marburg is responsible for data management. All data management 
activities will be done according to the current Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of Central 
Information Office Marburg. 
For reports and analysis the EDC system provides data export functionality for data management. 
The data can be exported in SAS or SPSS format for reports and analysis.  

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
38 of 51 
 
9.1 Subject identification database (IDAT) 
 
The IMBEI Mainz is responsible for programming the subject identification database (IDAT) and its 
hosting. This database contains names and addresses of the subjects and for each subject a 
unique subject ID. This subject ID is used for all documentation on eCRF and Data Clarification 
Forms (DCF). 
9.2 Medical Database / eCRF (MDAT) 
 
The Central Information Office Marburg is responsible for programming the eCRF (electronic Case 
Report Form) and hosting the medical database (MDAT). The eCRF will be designed in 
accordance to the clinical trial protocol. 
As EDC system the secuTrial® system of the Central Information Office Marburg will be used. 
secuTrial® is an internet based system with connection to a rational ORACLE® database. The 
software serves as remote data entry system for pseudonymized medical data. It includes 
functions for data entry in electronic forms, for data view, analysis and export. 
The software development was strictly proceeded in accordance to a standardized procedural 
model, meeting all ISPE GAMP4 requirements of software validation. secuTrial® is permanently 
audited to meet all requirements according to GCP, AMG, EMEA and FDA (21 CFR Part 11). It 
includes three different audit trail systems for medical data, user management and eCRF changes. 
Audit trail includes all changes made through the eCRF system within the database with additional 
login information and timestamp. This assures that any documentation and/or changes to 
database, user roles and medical items are traceable anytime. Changes or corrections can only be 
made by persons who have access to the system with user specific, role based access rights. Last 
audit was in May 2013. 
Data management based on GCP refers to the activities defined to achieve safe routines to 
efficiently enter patient information into a database, avoiding errors. The data management 
routines include procedures for handling of CRF, database setup and management, data entry and 
verification, data validation, quality control (QC) of database, and documentation of the performed 
activities including information of discrepancies in the process.  
Subjects’ data are documented with the EDC (Electronic Data Capture) system directly by the sites 
via web browser and are transferred via SSL encryption to the central medical database (MDAT). 
The EDC system is 21 CFR Part 11 compliant and has an implemented audit trail.  
 
9.3 Secure Hosting of the Medical database (MDAT) 
 
The server-hardware of the Central Information Office Marburg is recently renewed in November 
2012 to a currently up-to-date high-level processing power and storage system state. The server 
system is housed in a cage-in-cage-room in the High Security Data Center Itenos of the T-Systems 
AG, Nürnberg (20000-1 and ITIL certified). For the secure system administration the I-Motion 
GmbH, Fürth, is responsible (ISO-9001 and KV-Safenet certified). Server support is provided 
exclusively by high qualified and experienced personal.  
The secure hosting concept includes the conception and implementation of the safety and security 
standard operating procedures, the professional audit of all formal processes of data security and 
the continuous support by competent personal.  
Network traffic between the internet and the firewall systems, between the firewall systems and the 
application servers and between the application and the database servers is controlled by network 
based intrusion detection systems. All warnings and errors are logged in a separated database, 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
39 of 51 
 
located in the seperated IT-center of the I-Motion GmbH, Fürth, permanently controlled and 
watched by internal implemented analysis tools.  
The high availability of the medical research data is guaranteed by redundant hard disk systems 
(RAID) and a generation based data backup strategy.  
All medical data on the database servers and all log files of the firewall systems are backuped 
daily. Exchange of the backup-tapes of the individual generations is weekly with a three-week 
rotation. Tapes of the last generation are stored in a banque safe-deposit box. 
All systems are secured from power failures by a redundant uninterruptable emergency power 
supply system (USV, NEA). 
The ASP-hosting and server connections (ISP-Connectivity) of the server farm, located in the T-
Systems Data Center Itenos, Nürnberg, and their system administration by the I-Motion GmbH, 
Fürth, is audited regularly by the Central Information Office Marburg.  
Audit is based on  
 
German 
National 
Institute 
of 
Security 
in 
Information 
Technology 
(BSI):  
            Safeguard catalogues 
 
ISO 27000 (Management systems for Information Security) 
 
ISO 27001 (Information security management systems requirements specifications) 
 
ISO 27005 (Information security risk management) 
 
FDA Guidance for industry: Computerized Systems used in Clinical Trials (CSUCT) 
 
Good Clinical Data Management practices, ver. 4 
Last audit was in June 2012. 
 
9.4 Internet interface IDAT / MDAT 
 
Medical database (MDAT) and Subject identification database (IDAT) use a SSL encrypted 
interface for communication. If the investigator of a site requests a “new patient” in the MDAT, the 
IDAT is asked to send a form to enter name and address. In the IDAT a unique subject ID is 
created and stored together with name and address.  
The IDAT send the subject ID to the MDAT. (No identifying data will be sent back to and stored in 
the MDAT.) The MDAT will create a new database set for this subject ID and the medical data can 
be entered and stored.  
If the investigator has forgotten the subject ID of his patient, he can use the “new patient” request 
to ask for an already existing subject ID. He can enter name and address, and the IDAT will send 
the according subject ID to the MDAT. The MDAT will open the dataset for this subject ID and 
additional medical data can be entered.  
IDAT and MDAT databases are hosted at different independent locations, IDAT and MDAT 
databases are administrated from different independent teams.  
The MDAT system administration does not have access to the Subject identification database 
(IDAT).  
The IDAT system administration does not have access to the Medical database (MDAT).  
 
9.5 Data entry 
 
The investigator is responsible for the performance of the trial in accordance to the clinical trial 
protocol. All data collected during the trial have to be documented in the eCRF by authorized 
persons according to the personal log with delegation of authoritiy.  

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
40 of 51 
 
Detailed requirements for using the EDC system are specified in an EDC-Manual. 
The eCRF should always reflect the latest observations on the patients participating in the study. 
Therefore, the eCRF are to be completed as soon as possible during or after the patient’s visit. To 
avoid inter-observer variability, every effort should be made to ensure that the same individual who 
made the initial baseline determinations completes all effect and safety evaluations. The  
investigator must verify that all data entries in the eCRF are accurate and correct. If some 
assessments are not done, or if certain information is not available, not applicable or unknown, the  
investigator should indicate this in the eCRF. The investigator will be required to electronically sign 
off adverse and serious adverse event reports in the medical study database. 
In order to use the EDC system all participants entering and monitoring data are provided with 
training materials and required documentation before start of the trial by IZKS Mainz. Every person  
using the EDC system has to complete a registration form (User-ID request) to confirm that they 
have received the training material and have been trained for data entry. For training of data entry 
a test/training database will be provided. 
For support with data entry the Data management team of the national chILD-EU centers can be 
contacted. Each trial site has one responsible person who supports the national chILD-EU center 
in implementation of technical and organisational processes. A list of these persons is enclosed to 
DMP. 
Users with monitoring function are not able to enter or change data. They have the possibility to 
view the data write protected (review function) and they can raise discrepancies and/or SDV marks 
in case of queries. Discrepancies which appear at data management are forwarded to the site 
directly. 
 
9.6 Data concealment for electronic transfer 
 
Every investigator, study nurse, monitor or other person involved in the trial receives her or his 
personal login data (username and password). Access rights to the database will depend on the 
group affiliation. Every person who gets access to the system has to fill in a registration form (User-
ID request) and has to confirm that they have been adequately trained. Thus it is guaranteed that 
only authorized persons have access to the EDC system to document subjects in the trial. 
 
9.7 Database quality control 
 
Data have to be entered into the Medical database by the clinical investigator’s staff, using single 
data entry with electronic verification.  
 
The Medical database contains several completeness and plausibility data checks. During data 
entry these integrity checks help to minimize entry failures. They are programmed according to the 
data validation plan, signed by the coordinating investigator.  Case report forms can only be stored 
after answer completeness and plausibility errors with correct data entries.  
The data entry system allows the trial monitors to control the entry process with the help of several 
eCRF-internal review functions. Comments and requests can be processed by the trial site just in 
time. Subsequently, the entered data are systematically checked by the monitors, using the 
internal query system of the Medical database, completeness reports and printable queries details 
lists. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
41 of 51 
 
The investigator or a designated sub investigator, following review of the data in the eCRF, will 
confirm the validity of each subject’s data by electronic signature. The EDC system is capable to 
make exact copies of data in legible paper form for inspections and audits. 
Quality control audits of all key safety and efficacy data in the database are made prior to locking 
the database. Concomitant medications, medical history, current medical conditions and adverse 
events will be coded using the Medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) terminology. 
At the conclusion of the clinical trial, the occurrence of any protocol violations will be determined.  
After these actions have been completed and the database has been declared to be complete and 
accurate, it will be locked for additional data entries and final checks for plausibility, consistency 
and completeness of the data will be performed. Based on these checks, final queries can be 
produced. Any missing data or inconsistencies will be reported back to the respective site and 
clarified by the responsible investigator. A database audit will be accomplished to ensure and 
document the high-quality trial database. If no further corrections are to be made in the database it 
will be declared closed and used for statistical analysis. 
 
9.8 Storage and archiving of data 
 
According to GCP, the investigator will archive all trial data (subject identification list, source data) 
and relevant correspondence in the Investigator Site File (ISF). The ISF, all source data and all 
documents itemized in section 8 of the ICH Consolidated Guideline on GCP will be archived after 
finalization of the trial according to the legal regulations. 
Responsible for storage and archiving of other trial data will be the Coordinating investigator.  
Storage and archiving of the electronic data during the trial will be assured by the Central 
Information Office Marburg. After completion of the trial all electronic data will be handed over to 
the sponsor. 
 
 
10. ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS  
10.1 Good clinical practice 
The procedures set out in this trial protocol, pertaining to the conduct, evaluation, and 
documentation of this trial, are designed to ensure that all persons involved in the trial abide by 
good clinical practice (GCP) and the ethical principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki. The 
trial will be carried out in keeping with local legal and regulatory requirements. 
 
10.2 Patient information and informed consent 
Before being admitted to the clinical trial, the subject or the representatives must consent to 
participate after being fully informed about the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the 
clinical trial. 
The documents must be in a language understandable to the subject and must specify who 
informed the subject.  
A copy of the signed informed consent document must be given to the subject. The original signed 
consent document will be retained by the investigator. 
The investigator will not undertake any measures specifically required only for the clinical trial until 
valid consent has been obtained. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
42 of 51 
 
If the subject has a primary physician the investigator should inform the subject’s primary physician 
about the subject’s participation in the trial and if the subject agrees to the primary physician being 
informed. 
For subjects able to give informed consent: 
After reading the informed consent document, the subject must give consent in writing. The 
subject's consent must be confirmed by the personally dated signature of the subject and by the 
personally dated signature of the person conducting the informed consent discussions. 
For trials involving children: 
Since the subjects in this trial are children, the consent of both legally authorized representatives 
must be sought. Children who are able to understand the nature, scope, and possible 
consequences of the clinical trial must also give their informed consent. The consent must be 
confirmed by the personally dated signature of the representatives (and child, if applicable) and the 
personally dated signature of the person conducting the informed consent discussions. A copy of 
the signed consent document must be given to the representatives. The original signed consent 
document will be retained by the investigator. 
10.3 Confidentiality 
The name of the subjects and other confidential information will not be supplied to the sponsor. 
During the clinical trial, subjects will be identified solely by means of an individual identification 
code (e.g. subject number, randomization number). Trial findings stored on a computer will be 
stored in accordance with local data protection laws and will be handled in strictest confidence. For 
protection of these data, organizational procedures are implemented to prevent distribution of data 
to unauthorized persons. The appropriate regulations of data legislation will be fulfilled in its 
entirety. 
The subject will declare in the written consent to release the investigator from the medical 
professional secrecy to allow identification of subject’s name and/or inspection of original data for 
monitoring purposes by health authority and authorized persons (monitors). 
The investigator will maintain a personal subject identification list (subject numbers with the 
corresponding subject names) to enable records to be identified. 
 
10.4 Responsibilities of investigator 
The investigator will ensure that all persons assisting in the trial are adequately informed about the 
protocol, any amendments to the protocol, the trial treatments, and their trial-related duties and 
functions. 
The investigator will maintain a list of subinvestigators and other appropriately qualified persons to 
whom he or she has delegated significant trial-related duties. 
Any changes of the authorized trial personnel are to be communicated without delay to the IZKS 
Mainz. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
43 of 51 
 
10.5 Approval of trial protocol and substantial amendments 
 
Before the start of the trial, the trial protocol, informed consent document, and any other 
appropriate documents will be submitted to the independent ethics committee (IEC) for approval.  
The documents will also be submitted to the competent authority (BfArM), in accordance with the 
respective local legal requirements. 
Investigational products can only be supplied to the investigator after documentation on all ethical 
and legal requirements for starting the clinical trial has been received by the sponsor (“regulatory 
greenlight”). Before the first subject is enrolled in the trial, all ethical and legal requirements must 
be met. 
The IEC and, if applicable, the competent authority must be informed of all subsequent protocol 
amendments, in accordance with the respective local legal requirements. 
The sponsor must keep a record of all communications with the IEC and the competent authority.  
The EC must be informed of the end of the trial in accordance with legal requirements. 
10.6 Submission to local regulatory/competent authority 
Before the start of trial, the sponsor is responsible for submission of all documents necessary to 
the competent authority for approval, in accordance to the respective local legal requirements.  
10.7 Data monitoring committee (DMC) 
Details concerning the DMC will be described in a separate document.  
10.8 Insurance 
According to legal requirements, the sponsor has subscribe to an insurance policy covering, in its 
terms and provisions, its legal liability for injuries caused to participating persons and arising out of 
this research performed strictly in accordance with the scientific protocol as well as with applicable 
law and professional standards.  
Any impairment of health which might occur in consequence of trial participation must be notified to 
the insurance company. The subject is responsible for notification. The insured person will be 
agreed to all appropriate measures serving for clarification of the cause and the extent of damage 
as well as the reduction of damage. 
During the conduct of the trial, the subject must not undergo other clinical treatment except for 
cases of emergency. The subject is bound to inform the investigator immediately about any 
adverse events and additionally drugs taken. The terms and conditions of the insurance should be 
delivered to the subject. 
Insurance provisions for this clinical trial are given in separate agreements. 
10.9 Agreements 
10.9.1 Financing of the trial 
The trial is part of the EU research project “chILD EU”. 
The general conditions of financing for this trial are given in separate agreements. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
44 of 51 
 
10.9.2 Report 
After conclusion of the trial, a report shall be written by the sponsor, in cooperation with the 
coordinating investigator. The report will include a statistical analysis and an appraisal of the 
results from a medical viewpoint. It will be based on the items listed in this trial protocol. 
10.9.3 Publication policy  
It is planned to publish the results of the trial as an original article in an appropriate medical journal 
as well as presentation at congresses. The Coordinating investigator is first author of the article 
and will present the data at the major congresses. The choice of the journal for the publication will 
be made by the coordinating investigator in agreement with the co-authors. Besides the 
Coordinating investigator, further authors of this article have to meet the following points: 
 Recruitment of subjects into the study. 
 Contribution to interpretation of the data. 
 Contribution to drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. 
 
All details regarding authorship are given in the Contract with Participants in the European chILD 
Registry (chILD-EU) Research Project, which was signed by each participant involved in the study 
 
 Substantial contribution to the recruitment of subjects, i.e. one of the five best recruiting centers 
within the trial. 
 Substantial contribution to interpretation of the data. 
 Substantial contribution to drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual 
content. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
46 of 51 
 
 
12. DECLARATION OF INVESTIGATOR 
I have read the above trial protocol and I confirm that it contains all information to accordingly 
conduct the clinical trial. I pledge to conduct the clinical trial according to the protocol. 
I will enrol the first subject only after all ethical and regulatory requirements are fulfilled. I pledge to 
obtain written consent for trial participation from all subjects. 
I know the requirements for accurate notification of serious adverse events and I pledge to 
document and notify such events as described in the protocol. 
I pledge to retain all trial-related documents and source data as described. I will provide a 
Curriculum Vitae (CV) before trial start. I agree that the CV may be submitted to the responsible 
competent authority. 
I will conduct the trial in compliance with the protocol, GCP and the applicable regulatory 
requirements.  
 
 
 
Investigator 
Name  
Address 
 
Phone  
Fax 
 
e-Mail  
 
 
_________________  
_____________________________________ 
Date 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
 
Subinvestigator 
Name  
Address 
 
Phone  
Fax 
 
e-Mail  
 
 
_________________  
_____________________________________ 
Date 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
47 of 51 
 
13. REFERENCES 
Blatman KH, Grammer LC. Chapter 19: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 May 
Jun;33 Suppl 1:S64-6.  
 
Buchvald F, Petersen BL, Damgaard K, Deterding R, Langston C, Fan LL, Deutsch GH, Dishop MK, 
Kristensen LA, Nielsen KG. Frequency, treatment, and functional outcome in children with 
hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Nov;46(11):1098-107. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21479. 
Epub 2011 May 26. 
 
Craig TJ, Hershey J, Engler RJ, Davis W, Carpenter GB, Salata K. Bird antigen persistence in the home 
environment after removal of the bird. Ann Allergy. 1992 Dec;69(6):510-2. 
 
Fan LL. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002 Jun;14(3):323-6. 
 
Grammer LC, Roberts M, Lerner C, Patterson R. Clinical and serologic follow-up of four children and five 
adults with bird-fancier's lung. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 85:655. 
 
Griese M, Haug M, Brasch F, Freihorst A, Lohse P, von Kries R, Zimmermann T, Hartl D. Incidence and 
classification of pediatric diffuse parenchymal lung diseases in Germany. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009 
Dec 12;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-4-26. 
 
Griese M, Haug M, Hartl D, Teusch V, Glöckner-Pagel J, Brasch F, National EAA Study Group. 
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: lessons for diagnosis and treatment of a rare entity in children. Orphanet J 
Rare Dis. 2013, in press 
 
Kokkarinen JI, Tukiainen HO, Terho EO. Effect of corticosteroid treatment on the recovery of pulmonary 
function in farmer's lung. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Jan;145(1):3-5. 
 
Minder S, Nicod LP. Exogen allergische Alveolitis (Hypersensitivitäspneumonitis): Pathogenese, 
Diagnose und Therapie. Schweiz Med Forum. 2005;5:567–574. 
 
Mönkäre S. Influence of corticosteroid treatment on the course of farmer's lung. Eur J Respir Dis. 1983 
May;64(4):283-93. 
 
Nadia Nathan, Rola Abou Taam, Ralph Epaud, Christophe Delacourt, Antoine Deschildre, Philippe Reix, 
Raphaël Chiron, Ulrika de Pontbriand, Jacques Brouard, Michaël Fayon, Jean-Christophe Dubus, Lisa 
Giovannini-Chami, François Bremont, Katia Bessaci, Cyril Schweitzer, Marie-Laure Dalphin, Christophe 
Marguet, Véronique Houdouin, Françoise Troussier, Anne Sardet, Eglantine Hullo, Isabelle Gibertini, 
Malika Mahloul, Delphine Michon, Adrien Priouzeau, Laurie Galeron, Jean-François Vibert, Guillaume 
Thouvenin, Harriet Corvol, Jacques deBlic, Annick Clement, French RespiRare® Group. A national 
internet-linked based database for pediatric interstitial lung diseases: the French network Orphanet J 
Rare Dis. 2012; 7: 40. 
 
Pérez-Padilla R, Salas J, Chapela R, et al. Mortality in Mexican patients with chronic pigeon breeder's 
lung compared with those with usual interstitial pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 148:49. 
 
Quanjer PH., et al., Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung 
function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J, 2012. 40(6): p.1324-4 
 
Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wallaert B, Müller NL. Subacute and chronic bird breeder hypersensitivity 
pneumonitis: sequential evaluation with CT and correlation with lung function tests and bronchoalveolar 
lavage. Radiology 1993; 189:111. 
 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
48 of 51 
 
Reinhardt D. Therapie der Krankheiten im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Springer, 7 th Edition, 2004.  
 
Saag K, Furst D. Major side effects of systemic glucocorticoids. UpToDate 2013. 
 
Sansores R, Salas J, Chapela R, et al. Clubbing in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Its prevalence and 
possible prognostic role. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150:1849.  
Zacharisen MC, Schlueter DP, , Fink JN. The long-term outcome in acute, subacute, and chronic forms 
of pigeon breeder's disease hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 
Feb;88(2):175-82. 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
49 of 51 
 
14. APPENDIX DOSAGE TABLE 
weight 
month 1 
month 2 
month 3 
(kg) 
(mg Prednisolon) 
10 
5 
3 
1 
11 
6 
3 
1 
12 
6 
3 
2 
13 
7 
4 
1 
14 
7 
4 
2 
15 
8 
4 
2 
16 
8 
4 
2 
17 
9 
5 
2 
18 
9 
5 
3 
19 
10 
5 
3 
20 
10 
5 
3 
21 
11 
6 
3 
22 
11 
6 
3 
23 
12 
6 
3 
24 
12 
6 
3 
25 
13 
7 
4 
26 
13 
7 
4 
27 
14 
7 
4 
28 
14 
7 
4 
29 
15 
8 
4 
30 
15 
8 
4 
31 
16 
8 
4 
32 
16 
8 
4 
33 
17 
9 
5 
34 
17 
9 
5 
35 
18 
9 
5 
36 
18 
9 
5 
37 
19 
10 
5 
38 
19 
10 
5 
39 
20 
10 
5 
40 
20 
10 
5 
41 
21 
11 
6 
42 
21 
11 
6 
43 
22 
11 
6 
44 
22 
11 
6 
45 
23 
12 
6 
46 
23 
12 
6 
47 
24 
12 
6 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
50 of 51 
 
48 
24 
12 
6 
49 
25 
13 
7 
50 
25 
13 
7 
51 
26 
13 
7 
52 
26 
13 
7 
53 
27 
14 
7 
54 
27 
14 
7 
55 
28 
14 
7 
56 
28 
14 
7 
57 
29 
15 
8 
58 
29 
15 
8 
59 
30 
15 
8 
60 
30 
15 
8 
61 
31 
16 
8 
62 
31 
16 
8 
63 
32 
16 
8 
64 
32 
16 
8 
65 
33 
17 
9 
66 
33 
17 
9 
67 
34 
17 
9 
68 
34 
17 
9 
69 
35 
18 
9 
70 
35 
18 
9 
71 
36 
18 
9 
72 
36 
18 
9 
73 
37 
19 
10 
74 
37 
19 
10 
75 
38 
19 
10 
76 
38 
19 
10 
77 
40 
20 
10 
78 
40 
20 
10 
79 
40 
20 
10 
80 
40 
20 
10 
81 
41 
21 
11 
82 
41 
21 
11 
83 
42 
21 
11 
84 
42 
21 
11 
85 
43 
22 
11 
86 
43 
22 
11 
87 
45 
22 
11 
88 
45 
22 
11 
89 
45 
23 
12 

EudraCT: 2013-003689-15 
IZKS Trial Code: 2013-007 
Version 2.1 Date 11.12.2014
 
 
Final 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
   
51 of 51 
 
90 
45 
23 
12 
91 
46 
23 
12 
92 
46 
23 
12 
93 
47 
24 
12 
94 
47 
24 
12 
95 
50 
24 
12 
96 
50 
24 
12 
97 
50 
25 
13 
98 
50 
25 
13 
99 
50 
25 
13 
100 
50 
25 
13