A Phase 2 Study of IMGN901 (Lorvotuzumab Mertansine; NSC#: 783609) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Wilms Tumor, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Neuroblastoma, Pleuropulmonary Blastoma, Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST) and Synovial Sarcoma
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Pleuropulmonary Blastoma, Recurrent Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor, Recurrent Neuroblastoma, Recurrent Rhabdomyosarcoma, Recurrent Synovial Sarcoma, Wilms Tumor
Sponsor: Children's Oncology Group

 
 
ADVL1522 
 
1 
 
 
 
Activated: 
10/12/15 
Version Date:  
07/09/18 
Closed: 
06/16/17      
Amendment 
#2 
 
CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP 
 
 
ADVL1522 
 
 
A Phase 2 Study of IMGN901 (Lorvotuzumab Mertansine; IND# 126953, NSC# 783609) in Children 
with Relapsed or Refractory Wilms Tumor, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Neuroblastoma, Pleuropulmonary 
Blastoma, Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST) and Synovial Sarcoma 
 
 
A Phase 2 Study 
 
 
NCI Supplied Agent: IMGN901 (Lorvotuzumab Mertansine) 
IND sponsor for IMGN901: Children’s Oncology Group (COG) 
 
 
 
Open to COG Institutions within the United States 
 
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, AND SHOULD NOT BE COPIED, REDISTRIBUTED OR USED FOR ANY 
OTHER PURPOSE. MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THIS PROTOCOL IS NOT INCLUDED TO 
AUTHORIZE OR FACILITATE THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE BY ANY PERSON OR ENTITY.  RESEARCH MEANS A 
SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION, DESIGNED TO 
DEVELOP OR CONTRIBUTE TO GENERALIZABLE KNOWLEDGE.  THIS PROTOCOL IS THE RESEARCH PLAN DEVELOPED 
BY THE CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP TO INVESTIGATE A PARTICULAR STUDY QUESTION OR SET OF STUDY 
QUESTIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED TO DIRECT THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE BY ANY PERSON OR TO PROVIDE 
INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICAL CARE, TREATMENT, OR ADVICE TO ANY PATIENT OR STUDY SUBJECT.  THE PROCEDURES IN 
THIS PROTOCOL ARE INTENDED ONLY FOR USE BY CLINICAL ONCOLOGISTS IN CAREFULLY STRUCTURED SETTINGS, 
AND MAY NOT PROVE TO BE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN STANDARD TREATMENT.  ANY PERSON WHO REQUIRES MEDICAL 
CARE IS URGED TO CONSULT WITH HIS OR HER PERSONAL PHYSICIAN OR TREATING PHYSICIAN OR VISIT THE NEAREST 
LOCAL HOSPITAL OR HEALTHCARE INSTITUTION. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
For Statistics and Data Center Contact Person see: http://members.childrensoncologygroup.org 

 
 
ADVL1522 
2 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
CONTACT INFORMATION 
 
To submit site registration 
documents: 
For patient enrollments: 
Submit study data 
CTSU Regulatory Office 
1818 Market Street, Suite 1100 
Philadelphia, PA 19103 
Phone – 1-866-651-CTSU 
Fax – 215-569-0206 
Email: 
CTSURegulatory@ctsu.coccg.org 
(for submitting regulatory 
documents only) 
Please refer to the patient enrollment 
section of the protocol for instructions 
on using the Oncology Patient 
Enrollment Network (OPEN) which 
can be accessed at 
https ://www.ctsu.org/OPEN_SYSTEM
/ or https ://OPEN.ctsu.org. 
 
Contact the CTSU Help Desk with any 
OPEN-related questions at 
ctsucontact@westat.com. 
Data collection for this study 
will be done exclusively through 
Medidata Rave. Please see the 
Data Submission Schedule in the 
CRF packet for further 
instructions.  
 
 
The most current version of the study protocol and all supporting documents must be downloaded from the 
protocol-specific Web page of the CTSU Member Web site located at https://www.ctsu.org. Access to the 
CTSU members’ website is managed through the Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program - Identity and Access 
Management (CTEP-IAM) registration system and requires user log on with CTEP-IAM username and 
password. Permission to view and download this protocol and its supporting documents is restricted and is 
based on person and site roster assignment housed in the CTSU RSS.  
For clinical questions (i.e. patient eligibility or treatment-related) contact the Study PI of the Lead Protocol 
Organization. 
For non-clinical questions (i.e. unrelated to patient eligibility, treatment, or clinical data submission) 
contact the CTSU Help Desk by phone or e-mail:  
CTSU General Information Line – 1-888-823-5923, or ctsucontact@westat.com. All calls and correspondence 
will be triaged to the appropriate CTSU representative.  
For detailed information on the regulatory and monitoring procedures for CTSU sites please review the 
CTSU Regulatory and Monitoring Procedures policy located on the CTSU members’ website 
https://www.ctsu.org > education and resources tab > CTSU Operations Information >CTSU Regulatory and 
Monitoring Policy 
The CTSU Website is located at https://www.ctsu.org. 
 
 

  
 
ADVL1522 
3 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
SECTION 
PAGE 
STUDY COMMITTEE 
5 
ABSTRACT 
7 
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SCHEMA 
7 
1.0 
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (SCIENTIFIC AIMS) 
8 
1.1 
Primary Aims 
8 
1.2 
Exploratory Aims 
8 
2.0 
BACKGROUND 
8 
2.1 
Introduction/Rationale for Development 
8 
2.2 
Preclinical Studies 
11 
2.3 
Adult Studies 
13 
2.4 
Pediatric Studies 
17 
2.5 
Overview of Proposed Pediatric Study 
17 
2.6 
Development Plan 
18 
3.0 
ENROLLMENT PROCEDURES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 
18 
3.1 
Study Enrollment 
18 
3.2 
Eligibility: Inclusion Criteria 
22 
3.3 
Eligibility: Exclusion Criteria 
24 
3.4 
Regulatory 
25 
4.0 
TREATMENT PROGRAM 
27 
4.1 
Overview of Treatment Plan 
27 
4.2 
Cycle 1 
29 
4.3 
Therapy Subsequent to Cycle 1 (Cycles 2-17) 
33 
5.0 
DEFINITIONS AND DOSE MODIFICATIONS FOR TOXICITY 
37 
5.1 
Dose Modifications for Day 8 Dosing due to Toxicity on Day 8 
37 
5.2 
Definition of Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) 
37 
5.3 
Dose Modifications for Hematological Toxicity 
38 
5.4 
Dose Modifications for Non-Hematological Toxicity 
39 
6.0 
DRUG INFORMATION 
41 
6.1 
IMGN901 (LORVOTUZUMAB MERTANSINE) NSC# 783609, IND# 126953 
41 
6.2 
DEXAMETHASONE       (05/09/11) 
45 
7.0 
EVALUATIONS/MATERIAL AND DATA TO BE ACCESSIONED 
48 
7.1 
End of Therapy & Follow-up 
48 
7.2 
Correlative Biology Studies 
48 
7.3 
Central Review 
52 
8.0 
CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM PROTOCOL THERAPY AND OFF STUDY 
CRITERIA 
53 
8.1 
Criteria for Removal from Protocol Therapy 
53 
8.2 
Off Study Criteria 
53 
9.0 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
54 
9.1 
Sample Size and Study Duration 
54 
9.2 
Definition of Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)/ Tolerable Dose 
54 
9.3 
Study Design 
56 

  
 
ADVL1522 
4 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
9.4 
Methods of Analysis 
57 
9.5 
Evaluability for Response 
57 
9.6 
Evaluability for Toxicity 
58 
9.7 
Gender and Minority Accrual Estimates 
58 
9.8 
Analysis of the Pharmacokinetic Parameters 
58 
9.9 
Analysis of Biological and Correlative Endpoints 
58 
10.0 
EVALUATION CRITERIA 
59 
10.1 
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 
59 
10.2 
Response Criteria 
59 
10.3 
Response Criteria for Patients with Solid Tumors (non-CNS) 
59 
10.4 
Response Criteria for Neuroblastoma Patients with 123I-MIBG Positive Lesions 
60 
10.5 
Response Criteria for Neuroblastoma Patients with Bone Marrow Involvement 
62 
10.6 
Best Response (Solid Tumors) 
62 
11.0 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 
64 
11.1 
Purpose 
64 
11.2 
Determination of reporting requirements 
64 
11.3 
Expedited Reporting Requirements – Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) 
64 
11.4 
Specific Examples for Expedited Reporting 
65 
11.5 
Reporting Requirements for Specialized AEs 
67 
11.6 
Exceptions to Expedited Reporting 
68 
11.7 
Reporting Requirements - Investigator Responsibility 
68 
11.8 
General Instructions for Expedited Reporting via CTEP-AERS 
68 
11.9 
Reporting Table for Late Phase 2 and Phase 3 Studies – Table A 
70 
11.10 Protocol Specific Additional Instructions and Reporting Exceptions 
71 
11.11 Reporting of Adverse Events for commercial agents – CTEP-AERS abbreviated 
pathway 
71 
11.12 Routine Reporting of Adverse Events 
71 
12.0 
STUDY REPORTING AND MONITORING 
72 
12.1 
CDUS 
72 
12.2 
Data and Safety Monitoring Committee 
72 
12.3 
CRADA/CTA 
72 
APPENDIX I: YOUTH INFORMATION SHEETS 
75 
APPENDIX II: POSSIBLE DRUG INTERACTIONS 
77 
APPENDIX III: CTEP AND CTSU REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
78 
REFERENCES 
80 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
5 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
STUDY COMMITTEE 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
      
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
6 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AGENT 
 
NSC#   
IND# 
  
 
Dexamethasone  
34521 
IMGN901 
 
783609  
126953 
 
(IND Sponsor: COG) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SEE SECTION 7.2 FOR SPECIMEN SHIPPING ADDRESSES. 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
7 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
The Children’s Oncology Group has received a Certificate of Confidentiality from the federal government, 
which will help us protect the privacy of our research subjects. The Certificate protects against the 
involuntary release of information about your subjects collected during the course of our covered studies. 
The researchers involved in the studies cannot be forced to disclose the identity or any information collected 
in the study in any legal proceedings at the federal, state, or local level, regardless of whether they are 
criminal, administrative, or legislative proceedings. However, the subject or the researcher may choose to 
voluntarily disclose the protected information under certain circumstances. For example, if the subject or 
his/her guardian requests the release of information in writing, the Certificate does not protect against that 
voluntary disclosure. Furthermore, federal agencies may review our records under limited circumstances, 
such as a DHHS request for information for an audit or program evaluation or an FDA request under the 
Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act. 
The Certificate of Confidentiality will not protect against mandatory disclosure by the researchers of 
information on suspected child abuse, reportable communicable diseases, and/or possible threat of harm to 
self or others. 
 
 
ABSTRACT 
Novel therapeutic strategies are necessary to increase cure rates for children with relapsed or refractory 
Wilms tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma and other CD56-expressing tumors such as 
pleuropulmonary blastoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) and synovial sarcoma. Such 
cancers nearly uniformly express tumor cell surface CD56 or NCAM (neural cell adhesion molecule). 
Antibody drug conjugate therapies (ADCs) that target cytotoxic moieties, such as potent anti-microtubule 
poisons, directly to specific tumor cell receptors have been developed. IMGN901 (lorvotuzumab 
mertansine) is an ADC that links a potent anti-mitotic (DM1) via a disulfide linker to CD56 targeting 
antibodies. Pre-clinical data demonstrate potent in vivo effects of IMGN901 against Wilms tumor, 
rhabdomyosarcoma, and neuroblastoma. This trial will determine the clinical effects of IMGN901 
administered on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle to pediatric and adolescent patients with Wilms tumor, 
rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma or other CD56-expressing tumors such as pleuropulmonary blastoma, 
malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and synovial sarcoma. Pharmacokinetic data, including 
an assessment of impact on peripheral blood CD56+ cell burden, will be obtained.  
 
 
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SCHEMA 
 
Treatment Schema: 
 
IMGN901*          IMGN901* 
                       Evaluation  
 
Cycle:  
 
 
Day 1  
Day 8  
  
 
Day 21  
 
* IMGN901 is administered via intravenous infusion.  
 
A cycle of therapy is 21 days. Therapy may consist of up to 17 cycles, for a total duration of therapy 
approximating 12 months, absent disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. 
 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
8 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
1.0 
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (SCIENTIFIC AIMS) 
 
1.1 
Primary Aims 
 
1.1.1 
To assess the efficacy of IMGN901 in Wilms tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, 
neuroblastoma and other CD56-expressing tumors such as pleuropulmonary 
blastoma, MPNST and synovial sarcoma. 
 
1.1.2 
To determine the tolerability of the adult recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 
IMGN901 administered as an intravenous infusion, administered on Days 1 and 8 
of a 21-day cycle, to children with refractory Wilms tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, 
neuroblastoma, pleuropulmonary blastoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath 
tumor (MPNST), or synovial sarcoma. 
 
1.1.3 
To define and describe the toxicities of IMGN901 administered on this schedule. 
 
1.2 
Exploratory Aims 
 
1.2.1 
To correlate tumor response with tumor CD56+ expression. 
 
1.2.2 
To characterize the pharmacokinetics of IMGN901 in children with refractory 
cancer, including an assessment of impact on circulating CD56+ peripheral blood 
cells. 
 
 
2.0 
BACKGROUND 
 
2.1 
Introduction/Rationale for Development 
IMGN901 (lorvotuzumab mertansine) is a humanized immunoglobulin (IgG1) kappa 
monoclonal antibody, conjugated through a disulfide linker, to the cytotoxic maytansinoid, 
DM1, with an average of 3.5 molecules DM1 per antibody. The monoclonal antibody is 
the humanized version of the murine N901 monoclonal antibody engineered to bind 
specifically with the CD56 antigen, a member of the family of neural cell adhesion 
molecules (NCAMs). The target CD56 antigen is expressed on the surface of tumor cells 
of neuroendocrine origin, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC), carcinoid tumors; on 
neuroectodermal tumors, such as astrocytomas; as well as many multiple myelomas (MM) 
and ovarian cancers. CD56 is also nearly universally expressed on Wilms tumors, 
rhabdomyosarcomas, 
neuroblastomas,1-12 
pleuropulmonary 
blastomas, 
malignant 
peripheral nerve sheath tumors and synovial sarcomas.13-16 In Wilms tumor, CD56 has been 
specifically demonstrated to be a marker of the putative cancer stem cell.1,2 IMGN901 acts 
by binding to the target antigen, CD56 on tumor cells and once bound, the conjugate is 
internalized and DM1 released. Within the cell, DM1 disrupts microtubule assembly, 
leading to G2/metaphase arrest and ultimately cell death.17  
 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
9 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
IGMN901:  
Linker 
IMGN901 was made using the reagent N-succinimidyl 4-(2-pyridyldithio) pentanoate 
(SPP), which forms a stable disulfide link between the huN901 antibody and DM1 
(Figure 1). 
 
Antibody, huN901 
N901, a murine monoclonal antibody of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) 1 subclass, was 
originally generated as an antibody that binds specifically to natural killer (NK) cells and 
CD56-positive T-lymphocytes but is non-reactive with monocytes, B-lymphocytes, most 
T-lymphocytes that are CD56 negative, erythrocytes and platelets. The antibody binds to 
the CD56 antigen, a member of the NCAM family expressed on many tumors of 
neuroendocrine origin as outlined above. N901 also binds to about 70% of MMs and many 
ovarian cancers. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
10 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
Of normal tissue screened, binding was seen with cardiac muscle cells; peripheral nerve 
tissues: neuroectodermal cells, such as astrocytes; and neuroendocrine cells of the adrenal 
gland, pancreas and thyroid gland. N901 did not bind to bladder, bone marrow, cervix, 
colon, esophagus, kidney, liver, lung, skeletal muscle, pancreatic ducts, prostate glands, 
skin, small intestine, or uterus. Binding was also seen on a subset of lymphocytes in lymph 
node, spleen, and thymus that were thought likely to be NK cells and CD56-positive T-
lymphocytes. To overcome the limited effectiveness of murine antibody conjugates due to 
the formation of a human anti-murine antibody response in recipients, N901 was 
humanized by complementarity determining regions (CDR) grafting to form huN901, 
which retains 100% of the binding avidity of the parent murine antibody. The antibody was 
modified to introduce active disulfide-containing groups, which react with the thiol-
containing maytansinoid, DM1, via thiol-disulfide exchange, to produce a conjugate 
containing, on average, 3.5 DM1 molecules per antibody molecule. The huN901 antibody 
component of IMGN901 was initially produced from a murine SP2/0 cell line (MS-151). 
Later in development, the source of the huN901 antibody component of IMGN901 was 
changed to a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line (HD-157 or ND-199) because 
antibody production by the CHO cell line is more efficient. Comparability of IMGN901 
made with antibody produced from all cell lines has been demonstrated. Phase 1/2 clinical 
studies are being performed using IMGN901 made with antibody produced from the CHO 
cell lines.  
 
Cytotoxic Component, DM1 
DM1, the cytotoxic component of IMGN901, is a member of the maytansinoid family. 
Maytansinoids are mitotic inhibitors that kill cells by interfering with the formation of 
microtubules and depolymerization of already-formed microtubules (Figure 2). DM1 is an 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
11 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
analog of the well characterized maytansinoid, maytansine. Maytansine was studied 
extensively in nonclinical and clinical studies by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). 
 
DM1 differs from maytansine in that it contains a sulfhydryl group that allows the drug to 
be linked to an antibody via disulfide bond formation. 
 
In vitro screening showed maytansine to be 100- to 1000-fold more toxic than other 
cytotoxic drugs for a range of human cancer cell lines. Free maytansine had a low 
therapeutic index in human clinical studies because of high systemic toxicity. However, by 
conjugating maytansinoids with antibodies via cleavable disulfide bonds, the cytotoxicity 
can be targeted specifically against tumor cells. The intracellular cleavage of the disulfide 
bond is important for activity. 
 
2.2 
Preclinical Studies 
 
2.2.1 
Antitumor Activity 
In vitro studies show that the cytotoxicity of IMGN901 is restricted to CD56-
positive cells. For example, IMGN901 caused potent cytotoxicity with a 
concentration resulting in 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of approximately 
60 pM in the CD56-positive neuroblastoma cells IMR32, but was inactive in CD56 
negative colon cancer cells COLO205 at concentrations as high as 1.5 nM even 
though both cell lines show similar sensitivity to non-conjugated maytansine.15 
These data indicate that IMGN901 specifically induces CD56-dependent cytotoxic 
effects in cells expressing the target CD56 antigen, while sparing cells that do not 
express CD56 and which, therefore, cannot bind IMGN901. 
 
The immune effector activity of huN901 antibody and IMGN901 and their effect 
on the function and growth of CD56-positive human primary NK cells was 
investigated in vitro. It was found that huN901 fails to mediate complement 
dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) but induces antibody-dependent NK cell-mediated 
cytotoxicity (ADCC) in a dose-dependent manner against target cells expressing 
high levels of CD56, but not in those expressing low levels of CD56. IMGN901 
showed ADCC activity comparable to huN901 antibody alone, suggesting that 
DM1 conjugation did not alter the interaction between the Fc domain of the 
antibody and the Fc receptor of NK cells.17  
 
Adult Tumors Pre-Clinical Testing: Studies evaluating the in vivo efficacy of 
IMGN901 were conducted in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice 
bearing subcutaneous xenografts of adult-derived human tumor cell lines derived 
from SCLC, MM and ovarian cancer. In these studies, IMGN901 showed marked 
efficacy, including complete regressions in some animals.17-21  
 
Pediatric Tumors Pre-Clinical Testing:  
CD56 is well known to be expressed in all blastemal dominant Wilms tumors 
(typical at relapse), the majority of epithelial Wilms tumor components as well, all 
rhabdomyosarcomas, all neuroblastomas and the majority of pleuropulmonary 
blastomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and synovial sarcomas.4,13-
16,21  
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
12 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
The Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program tested IMGN901 against a panel of solid 
tumor models. In vitro experiments demonstrated low nanomolar IC50s against 
both rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma models. In vivo experiments, using a 
weekly x 3 schedule of 15 mg/kg/dose, demonstrated objective responses in 9/24 
(38%) models. Specifically, 2/2 Wilms tumor models (KT10 and KT11) 
demonstrated sustained complete remissions (2/2); 2/7 rhabdomyosarcoma 
models, which were both alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas, demonstrated sustained 
complete remissions (RH30 and RH65) with an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma 
model (RH36) demonstrated growth stasis; and 3/7 neuroblastoma models 
demonstrated complete responses (NB-SD, NB-1643, NB-1382).3 Additional 
investigation of a Wilms tumor cancer stem cell xenograft model, representing a 
CD56+ blastemal-type Wilms tumor, demonstrated complete responses to 
IMGN901.1,2  
 
2.2.2 
Animal Toxicology 
Nonclinical safety evaluation of IMGN901 has focused on studies in cynomolgus 
monkey due to the lack of cross-reactivity to the antigen in non-primate species. 
The principal target organ for this species is the peripheral and central nervous 
system (spinal cord). In a single dose study, single bolus IV infusion of IMGN901 
(152 and 456 mg/m2) was associated with dose-dependent minimal to mild 
findings of axonal degeneration of peripheral nerves and spinal cord. Repeat 
dosing was investigated on a weekly schedule (24 to 228 mg/m2 for six weeks) and 
daily schedule (2.4 to 114 mg/m2 for five days). At the lowest weekly dose tested 
(24 mg/m2) minimal lesions in the spinal cord only were noted. Higher dose levels 
(> 24 mg/m2 weekly or daily) were associated with lesions of the peripheral (sciatic 
and peroneal) and central (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal) nerves. 
 
The skin was also a target organ, with clinical changes relating to hyperkeratosis 
(peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) after a single dose of 456 mg/m2 or at repeated 
doses of ≥114 mg/m2 weekly. Skin darkening correlated with increased amounts 
of melanin pigment and prominent melanocytes in the skin were observed 
following repeat doses of ≥ 24 mg/m2 daily or ≥ 114 mg/m2 weekly.  
 
Changes in markers of hepatic function were limited to rises in transaminases and 
serum alkaline phosphatase (ALK) in the highest single dose tested (456 mg/m2) 
and transient rises in serum ALK activity with repeat daily doses of 114 mg/m2. 
There were no changes in markers of renal function. 
 
Treatment-related bone marrow suppression, leading to pancytopenia, and effects 
on the gastrointestinal (GI) system including enteropathy, affecting the small and 
large intestines, characterized by loss, dilatation and epithelial regeneration of 
intestinal crypts were seen in animals receiving the highest repeat daily dose of 
(114 mg/m2).17  
 
2.2.3 
Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Studies 
Briefly, pre-clinical pharmacokinetic studies in animals have demonstrated that the 
clearance of the antibody moiety of IMGN901 is similar to that of “naked” 
humanized antibody, with a t1/2 in mice of about five days for the antibody. Thus, 
conjugation of an average of 3.5 molecules of DM1 to huN901 does not 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
13 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
appreciably alter the PK properties of the huN901 antibody itself. IMGN901 t1/2 is 
approximately two days (55 hours) in mice and 30 hours in monkeys. The shorter 
t1/2 in monkeys may be due to CD56 binding, since IMGN901 cross-reacts with 
monkey CD56, but not murine CD56. The highest percentage of injected dose is 
found in the blood, liver, spleen, and kidney. 
 
In mice, clearance was biphasic: an initial rapid decline was followed, after about 
eight hours, by a slower rate of disappearance that followed first order kinetics 
(overall elimination phase) with an overall clearance rate of 2 to 3 mL/h/kg. In 
monkeys, the maximum concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC0-
inf) increased in an approximately dose proportional manner. The huN901 antibody 
component of IMGN901 itself had a slower clearance (t1/2 about three days) in 
monkeys than intact IMGN901, as assessed by an assay specific for total huN901 
antibody, whether conjugated or not. Comparison of the clearance curves for intact 
conjugate and total antibody (the difference between them) allows for estimation 
of the t1/2 of the disulfide link between DM1 and the huN901 antibody, which was 
calculated to be about 50 hours in vivo. Cmax and AUC0-inf values for total huN901 
antibody increased in an approximately dose proportional manner for the two doses 
(12.7 and 38 mg/kg) studied. The t1/2, volume of distribution, and clearance values 
calculated for total huN901 antibody were similar at the two doses of IMGN901. 
The relatively short t1/2 for total huN901 antibody (approximately three days) in 
monkeys relative to that expected for a human IgG1 antibody (approximately 
10 days) also suggests a contribution from CD56 mediated clearance in this 
species. No monkey anti-IMGN901 antibodies were detected. 
 
The tissue distribution in mice of 125I-huN901 antibody was compared with that 
of 125I-labelled IMGN901 conjugate, both dosed at 10 mg/kg. The pattern of 
uptake was similar at all time points and in all tissues. Distribution was 
characterized by a higher percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue in the 
blood, liver, spleen, and kidney for the first eight hours post-administration. At all 
time points, the highest percentage of the injected dose was in the bloodstream. 
These results suggest that conjugation does not alter the biodistribution of the 
antibody in vivo in mice.17  
 
2.3 
Adult Studies 
 
2.3.1 
Phase 1 and 2 Studies 
To date, there have been five IMGN901 studies. Studies 001, 002, and 003 
evaluated IMGN901 as monotherapy; Study 0005 evaluated IMGN901 
administered in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in 
relapsed/refractory MM; and Study 0007 evaluated IMGN901 in combination with 
carboplatin and etoposide in patients with SCLC.22-32  
 
As of March 2014, safety data is available on 198 patients from studies 001-003 
with single agent IMGN901. Study 001 tested weekly dosing for four weeks every 
6 weeks at doses ranging from 5 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2. The MTD was defined as 
60 mg/m2, with DLTs at 75 mg/m2 including headache with meningitis-like 
symptoms. Frequent AEs included headache, peripheral sensory neuropathy, 
nausea, fatigue, vomiting, rigors, myalgia, diarrhea, pyrexia and anorexia. 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
14 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Pharmacokinetics demonstrated a t1/2 of approximately 6 hours for doses 
≤ 10 mg/m2 and t1/2 of 16 hours at 60 mg/m2. 
 
Study 002 tested daily infusion for 3 days every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 4 
to 94 mg/m2/dose. The RP2D was defined as 60 mg/m2 with an MTD of 75 mg/m2. 
DLTs at 94 mg/m2 were headache, fatigue and myalgia. The most frequent AEs 
were headache, nausea, fatigue, vomiting and peripheral neuropathy. PKs 
demonstrated that the Cmax increased with dose and t1/2 approximated 1 day (20.6-
36.6 hours) at doses ≥ 48 mg/m2/day. 
 
Study 003 tested weekly IV infusions for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks, at 
doses ranging from 40-140 mg/m2. The MTD was defined as 112 mg/m2, with 
DLTs at 140 mg/m2 including reversible acute renal insufficiency in 1 patient and 
fatigue in 1 patient. Frequent AEs included fatigue, increased AST, increased uric 
acid, peripheral neuropathy, paresthesias, headache, constipation and diarrhea. PK 
findings demonstrated that the t1/2 was 23.7 hours at the highest dose tested. 
 
Study 005 tested weekly infusions of IMGN901 at doses of 75, 90 and 112 mg/m2 
for 3 consecutive weeks, every 4 weeks in combination with lenalidomide and 
dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Dose reductions due to 
late occurring toxicities prompted lowering the expansion dose level of IMGN901 
to 75 mg/m2. Most frequent AEs included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, 
nausea, pyrexia, headache, muscle spasms, and cough. The t1/2 of IMGN901 was 
18.2 hours at the highest dose level.  
 
Study 0007 tested weekly infusions of IMGN901 at doses of 60, 75, 90 and 
112 mg/m2 weekly for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks in combination with 
carboplatin and etoposide with an expansion cohort of SCLC patients. 
Myelosuppression and infection were more common on this combination therapy 
trial. As yet unexplained increase in infection on the IMGN901 arm vs control arm 
without IMGN901 was noted: 16% infection-associated SAEs with 11% being 
fatal vs 11% infection-associated SAEs with 4% being fatal. On target IMGN901 
peripheral neuropathy toxicity from DM1 was dose dependent, dropping from 86% 
(36% Grade 3) (IMGN901 dose 112 mg/m2) to 71% (11% Grade 3) (IMGN901 
dose 90 mg/m2). PKs of IMGN901 mirrored data achieved in prior trials. 
 
IMGN901 Single Agent Safety Summary: 
Treatment-related AEs in studies 001-003 (single agent studies) occurring in 
> 10% of patients in descending order of frequency include peripheral neuropathy 
(31%), headache (30%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), AST elevations, diarrhea 
and vomiting (13% each), myalgia (12%), and decreased appetite (11%). While 
the overall incidence of peripheral neuropathy and paraesthesia, regardless of 
relationship to study drug, was 33% and 9%, respectively, the Grade 3 incidence 
was low (3% and < 1% respectively), and there were no reports of Grade 4 toxicity. 
 
Fifty-six treatment-related SAEs were observed in 26 patients (13%). The most 
commonly reported treatment-related SAEs among patients receiving single-agent 
IMGN901 include headache (3%), constipation (2%), noninfective meningitis 
(2%, see below), and vomiting (2%). Early in clinical development of IMGN901, 
there were three cases of serious meningitis-like syndrome (meningitis-like 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
15 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
symptoms associated with headaches) in the single-agent studies. Following 
implementation of routine steroid prophylaxis and a slowed infusion rate, no 
additional reports of non-infective meningitis have been documented and Grade 3 
and Grade 4 headache have not been reported at the MTD in any of these studies. 
 
Some less frequently reported (less than 2%) but serious toxicities that have been 
reported with IMGN901 and were considered at least possibly related to study drug 
include fatigue (two patients), renal failure (one patient), posterior reversible 
encephalopathy syndrome (one patient), and myocardial infarction (one patient). 
For two patients receiving single-agent IMGN901 who died within 30 days after 
the last study drug dose, the cause of death was considered by the Investigator to 
be at least possibly related to study drug. One patient treated on the 001 study died 
10 days following the last dose of IMGN901, due to a retroperitoneal bleed and 
multi-organ failure that was deemed possibly related to the study treatment 
regimen. On the 002 study, one patient died 18 days following the last dose of 
IMGN901 due to bronchopneumonia that was assessed by the investigator to be 
possibly related to study treatment. 
 
DLTs for Studies 001, 002 and 003 were as follows: 
•  Study 001: DLTs observed in five patients over the course of the study included 
Grade 4 hyperesthesia; Grade 3 noninfective meningitis (n=3); and single events 
of Grade 3 fatigue, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. 
•  Study 002: DLTs observed in six patients over the course of the study included 
single events of Grade 4 fatigue and headache; and single events of Grade 3 
headache, myalgia, pain, paresthesia, and peripheral neuropathy. 
•  Study 003: DLTs observed in five patients over the course of the study included 
single events of Grade 3 fatigue, Grade 3 asthenia, Grade 3 lipase, Grade 3 renal 
failure, Grade 2 fatigue and two events of Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in one 
patient, 
 
Studies (001, 002, 003): Laboratory Abnormalities: 
Of the 198 patients across the three single-agent studies, 97% reported at least one 
abnormality. At least one hematologic abnormality of Grade 3 or 4 was reported 
in 35% and 1% of patients, respectively, with the most common Grade 3 or 4 
abnormality being lymphocyte count decreased (29%). All but one patient in the 
single-agent studies reported at least one serum chemistry abnormality. At least 
one abnormality of Grade 3 or 4 was reported in 46% and 8% of patients, 
respectively. Most results were Grade 1 or 2 in intensity. The most common Grade 
3 and/or 4 abnormalities were hyperglycemia (18%, all Grade 3) and gamma-
glutamyl transferase (GGT) increased (12%, 10% Grade 3 and 2% Grade 4). The 
institution of corticosteroid-based prophylaxis for the prevention of headache with 
meningitis-like symptoms, which was reported early in the development of 
IMGN901 may have contributed to the high rate of hyperglycemia. Increases in 
liver function tests have also been reported, but have been asymptomatic. 
 
2.3.2 
Pharmacology/Pharmacokinetics/Correlative and Biological Studies 
As of 31 March 2014, cycle 1 PK data from closed to accrual and completed 
clinical studies evaluating various dose regimens are available from Studies 001, 
002, 003, 0005 and 0007.  
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
16 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Study 001: The clearance of IMGN901 is rapid with a t1/2 of approximately 
six hours at the lowest doses (≤ 10 mg/m2). Clearance decreases at higher dose 
levels with the terminal elimination t1/2 being about 16 hours in the 60 mg/m2 
Phase 2 dose expansion cohort. The decreased clearance at higher doses may be 
due to the saturation of readily accessible CD56-positive expressing cells (e.g., NK 
cells) and/or soluble CD56 at these dose levels. 
 
Study 002: Decreased plasma clearance with increasing dose of IMGN901 was 
also observed in these patients. The Cmax and AUC0-inf for IMGN901 from Study 
002 generally increased with dose and an observed t1/2 of approximately one day 
(20.6 to 36.6 hours) at doses ≥ 48 mg/m2/day is consistent with previous findings. 
 
Study 003 (Table 1): PK findings are similar to those observed previously with 
the t1/2 of IMGN901 approaching one day (23.4 hours) at the highest dose level. 
AUC0-inf  and Cmax generally increase linearly with increasing IMGN901 dose. 
 
Study 0005: PK findings are similar to those observed previously with the t1/2 of 
IMGN901 approaching one day (18.2 hours) at the highest dose level.  
 
Study 0007, Phase 1: PK findings are similar to those observed previously with the 
t1/2 of IMGN901 approaching one day (23.4 hours) at the highest dose level for 
cohorts administered carboplatin with dose targeted to an area under the curve of 
5 and etoposide at 100 mg/m2. 
 
Study 0007, Phase 2: PK findings are similar to those observed previously, with a 
t1/2 of IMGN901 approaching one day (27.5 and 26.9 hours at Cycle 1, Day 1, and 
Cycle 4, Day 1, respectively) when IMGN901 was dosed at 112 mg/m2 along with 
carboplatin administered at a dose targeted to an area under the curve of 5 and 
etoposide at 100 mg/m2. 
 
The total antibody component shows similar clearance to that of the intact 
conjugate in patients. Free maytansinoid levels have been evaluated in plasma 
samples from patients treated in Study 003. In patients receiving between 40 and 
140 mg/m2 IMGN901, free maytansinoid levels in plasma were detected in 53% 
of the patients with the average maximal detectable level represented as 2.0 ± 0.8% 
of the maximal conjugated maytansinoid. 
 
Representative PK parameters from Study 003 are shown in Table 1 below: 
 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
17 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
Table 1 
 
 
2.4 
Pediatric Studies 
There is no prior experience with IMGN901 in children. 
 
2.5 
Overview of Proposed Pediatric Study 
This is a multi-strata Phase 2 study of IMGN901 where each stratum will be analyzed 
separately. Strata to be evaluated include Wilms tumor (Stratum 1), rhabdomyosarcoma 
(Stratum 2), neuroblastoma (Stratum 3); and strata for miscellaneous CD56-expressing 
tumors such as pleuropulmonary blastoma (Stratum 4), malignant peripheral nerve sheath 
tumor (MPNST) (Stratum 5), and synovial sarcoma (Stratum 6). IMGN901 will be 
administered weekly for two consecutive weeks every 3 weeks (Day 1 and 8 schedule of 
each 21-day cycle).  
 
The dose selected for this Phase 2 study is 110 mg/m2/dose. This was the RP2D/MTD on 
two of the adult Phase 1 trials (rounding down from 112 mg/m2/dose), and of the schedules 
studied in adult patients, provided the highest tolerable dose intensity, 73 mg/m2/week (as 
detailed above, the maximum tolerated dose intensity on the adult Phase 1 trials were 40, 
56, 64, 75 and 75 mg/m2/week). Moreover, the weekly times two schedule every three 
weeks would be the most favorable schedule to potentially integrate into a standard 
chemotherapy regimen should sufficient activity be observed to warrant further 
development. 
 
Careful safety monitoring will include an interim safety analysis following accrual of the 
first 6 patients as well as ongoing analyses for delayed toxicity (see Section 9.0). Absent 
unacceptable toxicity, each stratum will continue to accrue. In the event that 110 mg/m2 is 
deemed too toxic, the next six patients will be accrued at 90 mg/m2 and a second interim 
safety analysis conducted. Absent unacceptable toxicity, each stratum will continue to 
accrue at this dose level. In the event that 90 mg/m2 proves too toxic, the study will cease 
accrual and amendments considered. 
 
A limited sampling strategy will be employed to assess the pharmacokinetics of IMGN901 
from the Cycle 1, Day 1 dose. Peripheral blood will undergo analysis for CD56+ burden 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
18 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
(NK cell, T-cell subpopulations, for example) and considered in PK modeling. Tumor will 
be assessed for CD56 status via immunohistochemistry and correlated with response. 
 
2.6 
Development Plan 
Considering the targeted nature of drug delivery via the CD56 targeting antibody drug 
conjugate and different anti-mitotic agent (maytansinoid), it is possible that IMGN901 may 
demonstrate better efficacy than vincristine in the selected tumor types and/or efficacy in 
vincristine-resistant cancers. If we reach our targeted efficacy endpoints, further 
development of CD56-Antibody Drug Conjugate based therapy could be advanced via 
integration into chemotherapy backbones targeting high-risk or recurrent/refractory Wilms 
tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, and neuroblastoma, all of which are typically at least partially 
resistant to vincristine. 
 
 
3.0 
ENROLLMENT PROCEDURES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 
3.1 
Study Enrollment 
 
3.1.1 
Patient Registration 
Prior to enrollment on this study, patients must be assigned a COG patient ID 
number.  
 
This number is obtained via the COG Registry system once authorization for the 
release of protected health information (PHI) has been obtained. The COG patient 
ID number is used to identify the patient in all future interactions with COG. If you 
have problems with the registration, please refer to the online help.  
 
In order for an institution to maintain COG membership requirements, every newly 
diagnosed patient needs to be offered participation in ACCRN07, Protocol for the 
Enrollment on the Official COG Registry, The Childhood Cancer Research Network 
(CCRN).  
 
A Biopathology Center (BPC) number will be assigned as part of the registration 
process. Each patient will be assigned only one BPC number per COG Patient ID. 
For additional information about the labeling of specimens, please refer to the 
Pathology and/or Biology Guidelines in this protocol.  
 
Please see Appendix III for detailed CTEP Registration Procedures for Investigators 
and Associates, and Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) Registration Procedures 
including: how to download site registration documents; requirements for site 
registration, submission of regulatory documents and how to check your site’s 
registration status. 
 
3.1.2 
IRB Approval 
Sites must obtain IRB/REB approval for this protocol and submit IRB/REB 
approval and supporting documentation to the CTSU Regulatory Office before 
they can be approved to enroll patients. Allow 3 business days for processing. The 
submission must include a fax coversheet (or optional CTSU IRB Transmittal 
Sheet) and the IRB approval document(s). The CTSU IRB Certification Form may 
be submitted in lieu of the signed IRB approval letter. All CTSU forms can be 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
19 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
located on the CTSU web page (https://www.ctsu.org). Any other regulatory 
documents needed for access to the study enrollment screens will be listed for the 
study on the CTSU Member’s Website under the RSS Tab.  
 
IRB/REB approval documents may be faxed (1-215-569-0206), 
E-mailed (CTSURegulatory@ctsu.coccg.org) or mailed to the CTSU Regulatory 
office.  
 
When a site has a pending patient enrollment within the next 24 hours, this is 
considered a “Time of Need” registration. For Time of Need registrations, in 
addition to marking your submissions as ‘URGENT’ and faxing the regulatory 
documents, call the CTSU Regulatory Helpdesk at: 1-866-651-CTSU. For general 
(non-regulatory) questions call the CTSU General Helpdesk at: 1-888-823-5923. 
 
Study centers can check the status of their registration packets by querying the 
Regulatory Support System (RSS) site registration status page of the CTSU 
members’ web site by entering credentials at https://www.ctsu.org. For sites under 
the CIRB initiative, IRB data will automatically load to RSS. 
 
Note: Sites participating on the NCI CIRB initiative and accepting CIRB 
approval for the study are not required to submit separate IRB approval 
documentation to the CTSU Regulatory Office for initial, continuing or 
amendment review. This information will be provided to the CTSU Regulatory 
Office from the CIRB at the time the site’s Signatory Institution accepts the CIRB 
approval. The Signatory site may be contacted by the CTSU Regulatory Office or 
asked to complete information verifying the participating institutions on the study. 
Other site registration requirements (i.e., laboratory certifications, protocol-
specific training certifications, or modality credentialing) must be submitted to the 
CTSU Regulatory Office or compliance communicated per protocol instructions. 
 
3.1.3 
Reservation Requirements 
Prior to obtaining informed consent and enrolling a patient, a reservation must be 
made following the steps below. Reservations may be obtained 24 hours a day 
through the Oncology Patient Enrollment Network (OPEN) system.  
 
Patient enrollment for this study will be facilitated using the Slot-Reservation 
System in conjunction with the Registration system in OPEN. Prior to discussing 
protocol entry with the patient, site staff must use the CTSU OPEN Slot 
Reservation System to ensure that a slot on the protocol is available for the patient. 
Once a slot-reservation confirmation is obtained, site staff may then proceed to 
enroll the patient to this study.  
 
If the study is active, a reservation can be made by following the steps below: 
 
1) Log in to https://open.ctsu.org/open/ using your CTEP IAM user name and 
password.  
2) In order to make a reservation, the patient must have an OPEN patient number. 
Click on the ‘Slot Reservation’ tab to create an OPEN patient number, under 
‘Patients’. 
3) Using the OPEN patient number ‘RESERVE’ a slot for that patient.  

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
20 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
4) On the ‘Create Slot Reservation’ page, select the Protocol Number, enter the 
COG Patient ID, and choose the required stratum (if applicable) in order to 
obtain a reservation. 
 
Refer to the ‘SITE – Slot Reservation Quick Reference’ guide posted under 
the ‘Help’ tab in OPEN for detailed instructions:  
https://www.ctsu.org/readfile.aspx?fname=OPEN/OPEN_SlotReservation_Q
uickReference_SiteUserGuide_102612.pdf&ftype=PDF 
 
Prior to obtaining informed consent and enrolling a patient, a reservation must be 
made following the steps above. Reservations may be obtained 24 hours a day 
through the OPEN system.  
 
3.1.4 
Study Enrollment 
Patient enrollment will be facilitated using the Oncology Patient Enrollment 
Network (OPEN). OPEN is a web-based registration system available on a 24/7 
basis. To access OPEN, the site user must have an active CTEP-IAM account 
(check at < https://eapps-ctep.nci.nih.gov/iam/index.jsp >) and a ‘Registrar’ role 
on either the lead protocol organization (LPO) or participating organization roster. 
 
All site staff will use OPEN to enroll patients to this study. It is integrated with the 
CTSU Enterprise System for regulatory and roster data and, upon enrollment, 
initializes the patient position in the Rave database. OPEN can be accessed at 
https://open.ctsu.org or from the OPEN tab on the CTSU members’ side of the 
website at https://www.ctsu.org.  
 
Prior to accessing OPEN, site staff should verify the following: 
 
• 
All eligibility criteria have been met within the protocol stated timeframes. 
• 
All patients have signed an appropriate consent form and HIPAA 
authorization form (if applicable). 
 
Note: The OPEN system will provide the site with a printable confirmation of 
registration and treatment information. Please print this confirmation for your 
records. 
 
Further instructional information is provided on the CTSU members’ web site 
OPEN tab or within the OPEN URL (https://open.ctsu.org). For any additional 
questions 
contact 
the 
CTSU 
Help 
Desk 
at 
1-888-823-5923 
or 
ctsucontact@westat.com. 
 
3.1.5 
Timing 
Patients must be enrolled before treatment begins. The date protocol therapy is 
projected to start must be no later than 7 business days after the date of study 
enrollment. Patients who are started on protocol therapy prior to study 
enrollment will be considered ineligible and will not be able to receive further 
protocol therapy.  
 
See Section 3.2 for timing requirements for eligibility studies. See Section 3.1.7 
for timing requirements for baseline studies to be obtained prior to start of therapy.  

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
21 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
Institutions are advised to plan ahead to ensure adequate and timely delivery of the 
investigational agent (see Section 6.1.5 for details).  
 
Note: Repeat laboratory and imaging studies may be required if enrollment 
and start of therapy do not occur on the same day. 
 
3.1.6 
Institutional Pathology Report 
Immediately following enrollment in OPEN, the institutional pathology report for 
the diagnosis under which the patient is being enrolled must be uploaded as a PDF 
image within Rave. 
 
3.1.7 
Requirements to Initiate Protocol Therapy 
 
3.1.7.1 
Laboratory Studies: If more than 7 calendar days elapse between the date 
laboratory studies to determine eligibility were obtained (Section 3.2.5) 
and the start date of treatment, then the following studies must be 
repeated prior to initiating protocol therapy: CBC with differential, 
bilirubin, ALT (SGPT) and serum creatinine. If any of these repeat 
laboratory studies are outside the parameters required for eligibility (labs 
may again be repeated within 48-72 hours), then the patient is off 
protocol therapy.  
 
3.1.7.2 
Imaging Studies: Imaging studies must be performed within 14 calendar 
days of initiating protocol therapy. If more than 14 calendar days have 
elapsed between the date imaging studies to determine eligibility were 
obtained (Section 3.2.3) and the start date of treatment, then repeat 
imaging studies must be obtained prior to initiating protocol therapy. 
 
3.1.7.3 
Bone Marrow Evaluations: For patients with known or clinically 
suspected bone marrow involvement, BMA and/or biopsy must be 
performed within 14 calendar days of initiating protocol therapy. If more 
than 14 calendar days have elapsed between the date bone marrow 
evaluation to determine eligibility was obtained (Section 3.2.3) and the 
start date of treatment, then repeat BMA and/or biopsy must be obtained 
prior to initiating protocol therapy. 
 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
22 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
3.2 
Eligibility: Inclusion Criteria  
 
Important note: The inclusion criteria listed below are interpreted literally and 
cannot be waived. All clinical and laboratory data required for determining eligibility 
of a patient enrolled on this trial must be available in the patient's medical/research 
record. These source documents must be available for verification at the time of audit.  
 
All clinical and laboratory studies to determine eligibility must be performed within 7 days 
prior to enrollment. Imaging studies must be performed within 14 days prior to study 
enrollment. 
 
3.2.1 
Age  
• 
Patients must be ≥ 12 months and ≤ 30 years of age at the time of study 
enrollment. 
 
 
3.2.2 
Diagnosis  
Patients must have had histologic verification of one of the malignancies listed 
below at original diagnosis or at relapse  
• 
Primary Strata 
 
1) Wilms tumor 
2) Rhabdomyosarcoma 
3) Neuroblastoma 
• 
Secondary Strata: Miscellaneous CD56-expressing tumors: 
4) Pleuropulmonary blastoma 
5) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) 
6) Synovial sarcoma 
 
3.2.3 
Disease Status  
 
3.2.3.1 
Patients must have radiographically measurable disease (with the 
exception of those with neuroblastoma, see Section 3.2.3.2).  
 
Measurable disease is defined as the presence of at least one lesion on 
MRI or CT scan that can be accurately measured with the longest 
diameter a minimum of 10 mm in at least one dimension (CT scan slice 
thickness no greater than 5 mm).  
 
Note: The following do not qualify as measurable disease:  
• 
malignant fluid collections (e.g., ascites, pleural effusions) 
• 
bone marrow infiltration except that detected by MIBG scan 
for neuroblastoma, see Section 3.2.3.2  
• 
lesions only detected by nuclear medicine studies (e.g., bone, 
gallium or PET scans) except as noted in Section 3.2.3.2 
• 
elevated tumor markers in plasma or CSF  
• 
previously radiated lesions that have not demonstrated clear 
progression post radiation  
• 
leptomeningeal lesions that do not meet the measurements 
noted above. 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
23 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
3.2.3.2 
Patients with neuroblastoma who do not have measurable disease but 
have MIBG-avid evaluable disease are eligible. 
 
3.2.3.3 
Performance Level  
Patients must have a Lansky or Karnofsky performance status score of 
≥ 50, corresponding to ECOG categories 0, 1 or 2. Use Karnofsky for 
patients > 16 years of age and Lansky for patients ≤ 16 years of age. 
Patients who are unable to walk because of paralysis, but who are up in 
a wheelchair, will be considered ambulatory for the purpose of 
assessing the performance score. (See 
https://members.childrensoncologygroup.org/prot/reference_materials.asp) 
 
3.2.4 
Prior Therapy 
 
3.2.4.1 
Patients must have fully recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior 
chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy prior to entering this 
study.  
 
3.2.4.2 
Patients must have received standard treatment appropriate for their 
tumor type. 
 
a. Myelosuppressive chemotherapy: Patients with solid tumors must 
not have received myelosuppressive chemotherapy within 3 weeks 
of enrollment onto this study (6 weeks if prior nitrosourea). 
b. Hematopoietic growth factors: At least 14 days must have elapsed 
after receiving pegfilgrastim and least 7 days must have elapsed 
since the completion of therapy with a non-pegylated growth factor. 
c. Biologic (anti-neoplastic agent): At least 7 days must have elapsed 
since completion of therapy with a biologic agent. For agents that 
have known adverse events occurring beyond 7 days after 
administration, this period prior to enrollment must be extended 
beyond the time during which adverse events are known to occur.  
d. Monoclonal antibodies: At least 3 half-lives must have elapsed since 
prior therapy that included a monoclonal antibody. (See posting of 
half-lives for commonly used monoclonal antibodies on the DVL 
homepage; 
https://members.childrensoncologygroup.org/Disc/devtherapeutics/
default.asp.)  
e. Radiotherapy: ≥ 2 weeks must have elapsed since local palliative 
XRT (small port); ≥ 6 weeks must have elapsed since treatment with 
therapeutic doses of MIBG; ≥ 3 months must have elapsed if prior 
craniospinal XRT was received, if ≥ 50% of the pelvis was 
irradiated, or if TBI was received; ≥ 6 weeks must have elapsed if 
other substantial bone marrow irradiation was given.  
f. 
Stem Cell Transplant or Rescue without TBI: No evidence of active 
graft vs. host disease and ≥ 2 months must have elapsed since 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
24 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
transplant. 
 
3.2.5 
Organ Function Requirements 
 
3.2.5.1 
Adequate Bone Marrow Function Defined As: 
a. For patients with solid tumors without bone marrow involvement: 
• 
Peripheral absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1000/µL 
• 
Platelet count ≥ 100,000/µL (transfusion independent, defined 
as not receiving platelet transfusions within a 7-day period 
prior to enrollment) 
 
b. For patients with solid tumors and known bone marrow metastatic 
disease: 
• 
Peripheral absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 750/µL 
• 
Platelet count ≥ 75,000/µL (transfusion independent, defined 
as not receiving platelet transfusions for at least 7 days prior to 
enrollment). 
 
3.2.5.2 
Adequate Renal Function Defined As: 
• Creatinine clearance or radioisotope GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 
a serum creatinine based on age/gender as follows: 
 
 
Age 
 
Maximum Serum 
Creatinine (mg/dL) 
 
Male 
Female 
1 to < 2 years 
0.6 
0.6 
2 to < 6 years 
0.8 
0.8 
6 to < 10 years 
1 
1 
10 to < 13 years 
1.2 
1.2 
13 to < 16 years 
1.5 
1.4 
≥ 16 years 
1.7 
1.4 
The threshold creatinine values in this Table were derived from the 
Schwartz formula for estimating GFR (Schwartz et al. J. Peds, 106:522, 
1985) utilizing child length and stature data published by the CDC. 
 
3.2.5.3 
Adequate Liver Function Defined As: 
• 
Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for age 
• 
SGPT (ALT) ≤ 110 U/L (for the purpose of this study, the ULN for 
SGPT is 45 U/L) 
• 
Serum albumin ≥ 2 g/dL. 
 
3.2.5.4 
Adequate Cardiac Function Defined As: 
• 
Shortening fraction of ≥ 27% by echocardiogram, or 
• 
Ejection fraction of ≥ 50% by gated radionuclide study. 
 
3.2.5.5 
Central Nervous System Function 
• Patients with seizure disorder may be enrolled if on anticonvulsants 
and well controlled. 
 
3.3 
Eligibility: Exclusion Criteria 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
25 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Important note: The exclusion criteria listed below are interpreted literally 
and cannot be waived. All clinical and laboratory data required for 
determining eligibility of a patient enrolled on this trial must be available in 
the patient’s medical/research record. These source documents must be 
available for verification at the time of audit.  
 
3.3.1 
Pregnancy or Breastfeeding 
Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding are not eligible for this study as there 
is yet no available information regarding human fetal or teratogenic toxicities. 
Negative pregnancy tests must be obtained in girls who are post-menarchal. Males 
or females of reproductive potential may not participate unless they have agreed 
to use an effective contraceptive method for the duration of study therapy and for 
4 weeks after the last dose of study therapy. Study drug may also potentially be 
secreted in milk and therefore breastfeeding women are excluded. 
 
3.3.2 
Concomitant Medications  
 
3.3.2.1 
Corticosteroids: Patients requiring corticosteroids who have not been on 
a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroid for the 7 days prior to 
enrollment are not eligible. 
 
3.3.2.2 
Patients who have received previous treatment with IMGN901 are not 
eligible. 
 
3.3.2.3 
Investigational Drugs: Patients who are currently receiving another 
investigational drug are not eligible. 
 
3.3.2.4 
Anti-cancer Agents: Patients who are currently receiving other anti-
cancer agents are not eligible.  
 
3.3.2.5 
Anti-GVHD or agents to prevent organ rejection post-transplant: 
Patients who are receiving cyclosporine, tacrolimus or other agents to 
prevent either graft-versus-host disease post bone marrow transplant or 
organ rejection post-transplant are not eligible for this trial. 
 
3.3.3 
Central Nervous System Function 
Patients who have a CNS toxicity > Grade 2 are not eligible. 
 
3.3.4 
CNS Metastases 
Patients must not have known active CNS metastases. Patients with known central 
nervous system metastases are excluded unless treated surgically or with 
radiotherapy, and stable with no recurrent lesions for at least 6 months. 
 
3.3.5 
Peripheral Neuropathy 
Patients who have baseline peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2 are not eligible.  
 
3.3.6 
Infection 
Patients who have an uncontrolled infection are not eligible. 
 
3.3.7 
Patients who in the opinion of the investigator may not be able to comply with the 
safety monitoring requirements of the study are not eligible. 
 
3.4 
Regulatory 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
26 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
3.4.1 
All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed 
consent. 
 
3.4.2 
All institutional, FDA, and NCI requirements for human studies must be met. 
 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
27 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
4.0 
TREATMENT PROGRAM 
Timing of protocol therapy administration, response assessment studies, and surgical 
interventions are based on schedules derived from the experimental design or on established 
standards of care. Minor unavoidable departures (up to 72 hours) from protocol directed therapy 
and/or disease evaluations (and up to 1 week for surgery) for valid clinical, patient and family 
logistical, or facility, procedure and/or anesthesia scheduling issues are acceptable (except 
where explicitly prohibited within the protocol). 
 
4.1 
Overview of Treatment Plan 
 
4.1.1 
Treatment Overview: 
 
NOTE: Accrual of the first 6 patients is limited to Phase 1 Consortium institutions. 
Subsequent enrollments are open to COG institutions within the United States. 
 
This will be a single-arm open label trial with three primary disease strata as 
outlined in the statistical section (Section 9.0) and three additional secondary strata 
for rarer cancers known to frequently express CD56. 
 
All patients will receive IMGN901 intravenously on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days. 
See Section 4.1.4 for dose information. A cycle of therapy is 21 days. Treatment 
may consist of up to 17 cycles, for an approximate total therapy duration of 
12 months, absent disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. 
 
4.1.2 
Treatment Schema: 
 
IMGN901*          IMGN901*                  Evaluation 
 
            Cycle:  
 
 
Day 1 
 
Day 8  
       Day 21 
 
 
* IMGN901 is administered via intravenous infusion. Cycle 1 Day 1 infusion will 
start at 0.02 mg/kg/min (maximum 1 mg/min) x 15 minutes and if tolerated, the 
rate may then increase to 0.06 mg/kg/min (maximum 3 mg/min) to complete the 
infusion. If the patient tolerates the Cycle 1, Day 1 infusion, all subsequent 
infusions may be delivered at the 0.06 mg/kg/min (maximum 3 mg/min) rate. 
 
All patients should receive pre-medication with dexamethasone. See Sections 4.2.3 
and 4.3.3 for details. 
 
Drug doses should be adjusted based on the BSA calculated from height and 
weight measured within 7 days prior to the beginning of each cycle.  
 
4.1.3 
Criteria for Starting Subsequent Cycles 
A cycle may be repeated every 21 days if the patient has at least stable disease, has 
again met laboratory parameters as defined in the eligibility section (Section 3.2.5) 
and has not met one of the Off Protocol Therapy or Off Study Criteria 
(Section 8.0). Patients who have experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (see 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
28 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Section 5.0) in the previous cycle should have the dose modified (see 
Section 4.1.4). Treatment may consist of up to 17 cycles, for a total duration of 
therapy approximating 12 months, absent disease progression or unacceptable 
toxicity. To continue on therapy the patient must have at least clinically and 
radiographically stable disease. Radiographic disease evaluations will be done 
after the 2nd cycle of therapy, after every other cycle until 6 months, and then every 
3 months. 
 
4.1.4 
Dose Schema: 
The starting dose will be 110 mg/m2 (dose level 1). For patients with toxicities as 
outlined in Section 5.0 and who recover to starting criteria within 7 days as 
outlined in Section 4.1.3, a single dose reduction to the next lowest dose level will 
be allowed. 
 
Dose Level 
IMGN901  
(mg/m2) 
Day(s) of 
Administration  
-2  
-1 
75 
90 
1 and 8 
1 and 8 
   1*  
110 
1 and 8 
*Starting dose level 
 
Further dose reduction for toxicity will be considered if dose level -1 is not 
tolerated. No dose escalations will occur. 
 
4.1.5 
Concomitant Therapy  
1. No other anti-cancer agents may be used while on protocol therapy. 
 
2. No other investigational agents may be used while on protocol therapy. 
 
For COG Supportive Care Guidelines see:  
https://members.childrensoncologygroup.org/prot/reference_materials.asp 
under 
Standard Sections for Protocols. 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
 
 
 
ADVL1522 
29 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycle 1  
 
4.2 
Cycle 1 
4.2.1 
Therapy Delivery Map – Cycle 1 
 
This therapy delivery map (TDM) relates to Cycle 1, which lasts 21 days. 
____________________________ 
Patient COG ID number 
________________________ 
DOB  
 
Criteria to start Cycle 1 are listed in Section 3.1.7 and 3.2.5. Extensive treatment details are in Section 4.2.3. This TDM is on 1 page. 
 
DRUG 
ROUTE 
DOSAGE 
DAYS 
IMPORTANT NOTES 
IMGN901 
IND # 126953 
IV 
110 mg/m2 (dose level 1). 
See Dose Schema in Section 4.1.4 
1 and 8 
Day 1: Start at 0.02 mg/kg/min (maximum 1 mg/min) 
x 15 minutes and may then increase to 0.06 mg/kg/min 
(maximum 3 mg/min) to complete the infusion. 
 
Day 8: If the patient tolerates Cycle 1 Day 1 infusion, all 
subsequent infusions may be delivered at the 0.06 mg/kg/min 
(maximum 3 mg/min) rate. 
 
The administration of the study drug is approximately 1-1.5 hours 
in duration and will vary slightly depending on the dose. 
Dexamethasone 
PO/IV 
4 mg/m2/dose (max 10 mg) BID 
0 and 7 
Total daily dose: 8 mg/m2/day 
Dexamethasone 
IV 
4 mg/m2/dose (max dose 10 mg) 
1 and 8 
Administer approximately one hour prior to the first 
chemotherapy infusion. 
Ht _________cm 
 
Wt _________kg 
 
BSA _________m2 
 
Date Due 
Date Given 
Day 
DEX (PO/IV) 
____mg 
DEX (IV) 
____mg 
IMGN901 
____mg 
Studies 
 
 
 
Enter calculated dose above and actual dose administered below 
 
 
 
0 
____mg 
 
 
 
 
 
1 
 
____mg 
____mg 
a-m 
 
 
7 
____mg 
 
 
 
 
 
8 
 
____mg 
____mg 
c-f, k, l 
 
 
15 
 
 
 
c-f 
 
 
21 
 
 
 
c-f, h 
 
 
Following completion of Cycle 1, the next cycle starts on Day 22 or when patient has again met 
laboratory parameters as defined in eligibility Section 3.2.5 (whichever occurs later). 
 
See Section 5.0 for Dose Modifications for Toxicities (including specific criteria for Day 8 IMGN901 infusions) and the COG Member website for 
Supportive Care Guidelines. 
 
 
Page 1 of 2 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
30 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycle 1  
 
4.2.2 
Required Observations in Cycle 1 
All baseline studies must be performed prior to starting protocol therapy unless otherwise 
indicated below.  
 
a. Hx/Wt /Ht/BSA. 
b. Performance status 
c. Physical exam (including VS) 
d. CBC/diff/platelets: If patients have Grade 4 neutropenia then CBCs should be checked every 3 to 
4 days until recovery to Grade 3 or until meeting the criteria for dose limiting toxicity. 
e. Electrolytes including Ca++, PO4, Mg++ 
f. 
Creatinine, SGPT, bilirubin 
g. Total protein/albumin 
h. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH): pre-treatment and after completion of Cycle 1. Free T4 should 
also be measured for patients with an abnormal TSH level. 
i. 
Echocardiogram 
j. 
Pregnancy test. Female patients of childbearing potential require a negative pregnancy test prior to 
starting treatment; sexually active patients must use an acceptable method of birth control. 
k. Peripheral blood for PK to be drawn at the following time points (see Section 7.2.1):  
o Day 1: Pretreatment, end of infusion, and 2 hrs, 6 hrs, 24 hrs, 72-120 hrs after the end of the 
infusion 
o Day 8: Pretreatment, end of infusion, and 2 hrs and 6 hrs after the end of the infusion 
Note: the exact time that the sample is drawn along with the exact time that the drug is administered is to 
be recorded on the Pharmacokinetic Transmittal form. 
l. 
Peripheral Blood for CD56: prior to (within 12 hours of starting) IMGN901 on Days 1 and 8. (See 
Section 7.2.2.)  
m. Unstained tumor slides for CD56 expression by immunohistochemistry. (See Section 7.2.3.) 
 
This listing only includes evaluations necessary to answer the primary and secondary aims. OBTAIN 
OTHER STUDIES AS REQUIRED FOR GOOD CLINICAL CARE.  
 
Comments 
(Include any held doses, or dose modifications) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page 2 of 2 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
31 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycle 1  
 
4.2.3 
Treatment Details: Cycle 1 
 
IMGN901: IV 
Days: 1 and 8 
Dose: 110 mg/m2/dose  
 
Administer IMGN901 IV infusion within 8 hours of preparation using a low protein binding 0.22-
micron filter.  
 
Administer at a rate of 0.02 mg/kg/min (maximum 1 mg/min) for the first 15 minutes. Provided the 
patient tolerates this rate, the rate can be increased to 0.06 mg/kg/min (maximum 3 mg/min). If the 
patient tolerates Cycle 1 Day 1 infusion, all subsequent infusions may be delivered at the 
0.06 mg/kg/min (maximum 3 mg/min) rate. The administration of the study drug is approximately 
1-1.5 hours in duration and will vary slightly depending on the dose. The table below provides 
examples of infusion rate calculations. 
 
If an infusional reaction occurs, the infusion should be stopped and supportive care given as per 
institutional guidelines. Anaphylactic precautions should be observed during IMGN901 
administration. Patients should be monitored for at least 1 hour after completion of the infusion. 
See Section 5.4.4 for management and dose modification guidelines for infusional reactions. 
 
Drug doses should be adjusted based on the BSA calculated from height and weight measured 
within 7 days prior to the beginning of each cycle.  
 
Note: Pretreatment use of acetaminophen and/or diphenhydramine may be considered as per 
Investigator’s routine practice. If provided, it is recommended that these agents be administered 30 
to 60 minutes prior to the start of the IMGN901 infusion.  
 
IMGN901 Infusion Rate Calculation Examples Cycle 1 (Dose Level 1 (110 mg/m2/dose)) 
 
Example 
# 
Patient demographics 
Initial fusion rate  
(0.02 mg/kg/min) 
Subsequent infusion 
rate  
(0.06 mg/kg/min) 
Total Infusion 
Duration 
1 
Weight – 12 kg  
BSA – 0.52 m2  
IMGN901 dose = 57 mg 
0.02 mg/kg/min x 12 kg 
= 0.24 mg/min x 15 min 
= 3.6 mg 
 
(3.6 mg of IMGN901 delivered 
over initial 15 min, with 
53.4 mg remaining) 
0.06 mg/kg/min x 12 kg 
= 0.72 mg/min   
 
53.4 mg : 0.72 mg/min  
= 74.2 min 
 
(remaining 53.4 mg of 
IMGN901 delivered over 
74.2 min) 
15 min + 74.2 min 
= 89.2 min 
2 
Weight – 30 kg 
BSA – 1.1 m2 
IMGN901 dose = 121 mg 
0.02 mg/kg/min x 30 kg 
= 0.6 mg/min x 15 min 
= 9 mg 
 
(9 mg of IMGN901 delivered 
over initial 15 min, with 
112 mg remaining) 
0.06 mg/kg/min x 30 kg 
= 1.8 mg/min  
 
112 mg : 1.8 mg/min  
= 62.2 min  
 
(remaining 112 mg of 
IMGN901 delivered over 
62.2 min) 
15 min + 62.2 min 
= 77.2 min 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
32 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycle 1  
3 
Weight – 77 kg 
BSA – 1.92 m2 
IMGN901 dose = 211 mg 
0.02 mg/kg/min x 77 kg 
= 1 mg/min (max rate) x 15 min 
= 15 mg 
 
(15 mg of IMGN901 delivered 
over initial 15 min, with 
196 mg remaining) 
0.06 mg/kg/min x 77 kg 
= 3 mg/min (max rate) 
 
196 mg : 3 mg/min  
= 65.3 min  
 
(remaining 196 mg of 
IMGN901 delivered over 
65.3 min) 
15 min + 65.3 min 
= 80.3 min 
 
Dexamethasone: PO or IV 
Days: 0 and 7 
Dose: 4 mg/m2/dose (max dose 10 mg) BID (i.e., total daily dose = 8 mg/m2/day) 
 
On the day prior to administration of IMGN901, patients should receive dexamethasone twice a 
day (BID).  The administration of dexamethasone BID 1 day prior to IMGN901 in patients with 
diabetes may be omitted at the discretion of the Investigator. Additionally, modifications in 
dexamethasone dosing such as the elimination or reduction of doses may be taken if a patient is 
shown to be intolerant of full dosing. 
 
Dexamethasone: IV 
Days: 1 and 8 
Dose: 4 mg/m2/dose (max dose 10 mg)  
On the day of infusion, patients should receive dexamethasone approximately one hour prior to the 
first chemotherapy infusion. 
 
See Section 5.0 for Dose Modifications based on Toxicities, including specific criteria for 
Day 8 IMGN901 infusions.  
 
Following completion of Cycle 1, the next cycle starts on Day 22 or when patient has again met 
laboratory parameters as defined in eligibility Section 3.2.5 (whichever occurs later). 
 
 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
 
 
 
ADVL1522 
33 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycles 2-17 
 
 
4.3 
Therapy Subsequent to Cycle 1 (Cycles 2-17)  
4.3.1 
Therapy Delivery Map – Cycles 2-17 
This therapy delivery map (TDM) relates to all cycles given after Cycle 1. Each cycle lasts 21 days. Patient 
may receive additional cycles if they meet the requirements described in Section 4.1.3. Cycles may be 
repeated for up to 17 cycles of therapy in total, up to a total duration of therapy of 12 months, absent disease 
progression or unacceptable toxicity. 
____________________________ 
Patient COG ID number 
________________________ 
DOB  
 
See Section 4.1.3 for guidelines for starting next cycle. Extensive details are Section 4.3.3. This TDM is on 1 page. 
 
DRUG 
ROUTE 
DOSAGE 
DAYS 
IMPORTANT NOTES 
IMGN901 
IND # 126953 
IV 0.06 mg/kg/min 
(maximum 3 mg/min)* 
110 mg/m2 (dose level 1). 
See Dose Schema in Section 4.1.4 
1 and 8 
*unless patient did not tolerate Cycle 1 Day 1 infusion 
(see Section 4.2.3). 
The administration of the study drug is approximately  
1-1.5 hours in duration and will vary slightly depending 
on the dose. 
Dexamethasone 
PO/IV 
4 mg/m2/dose (max 10 mg) BID 
0 and 7 
Total daily dose: 8 mg/m2/day 
Dexamethasone 
IV 
4 mg/m2/dose (max dose 10 mg) 
1 and 8 
Administer approximately one hour prior to the first 
chemotherapy infusion. 
Enter Cycle #: _____  
 
Ht _________cm 
 
Wt _________kg 
 
BSA _________m2 
 
Date Due 
Date Given 
Day 
DEX (PO/IV) 
____mg 
DEX (IV) 
____mg 
IMGN901 
____mg 
Studies 
 
 
 
Enter calculated dose above and actual dose administered below 
 
 
 
0 
____mg 
 
 
 
 
 
1 
 
____mg 
____mg 
a-e, g, h 
 
 
7 
____mg 
 
 
 
 
 
8 
 
____mg 
____mg 
 
 
 
15 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Following completion of this cycle, the next cycle starts on Day 22 or when patient has again met 
laboratory parameters as defined in eligibility Section 3.2.5 (whichever occurs later). 
f 
See Section 5.0 for Dose Modifications for Toxicities (including specific criteria for Day 8 IMGN901 infusions) and the COG Member website for 
Supportive Care Guidelines. 
 
 
Page 1 of 2 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
34 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycles 2-17 
 
4.3.2 
Required Observations in Cycles 2-17 
All baseline studies must be performed prior to starting protocol therapy unless otherwise 
indicated below.  
 
 
This listing only includes evaluations necessary to answer the primary and secondary aims.  
OBTAIN OTHER STUDIES AS REQUIRED FOR GOOD CLINICAL CARE.  
 
Comments 
(Include any held doses, or dose modifications) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a. Hx/Wt /Ht/BSA.  
b. Physical exam (including VS) 
c. CBC/diff/platelets: If patient experienced Grade 4 myelosuppression, weekly CBCs should be 
determined in subsequent cycles. 
d. Electrolytes including Ca++, PO4, Mg++ 
e. Creatinine, SGPT, bilirubin 
f. 
Disease evaluation: After every other cycle (Cycles 2, 4, 6, etc.) until 6 months, and then every 
3 months. 
g. Total protein/albumin 
h. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH): prior to every other cycle, starting prior to Cycle 3. Free T4 
should also be measured for patients with an abnormal TSH level. 
 
Page 2 of 2 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
35 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycles 2-17 
4.3.3 
Treatment Details: Cycles 2-17 
 
IMGN901: IV 
Days: 1 and 8 
Dose: 110 mg/m2/dose  
 
Administer IMGN901 IV infusion within 8 hours of preparation using a low protein binding 0.22-
micron filter.  
 
Administer at a rate of 0.06 mg/kg/min (maximum 3 mg/min) unless patient did not tolerate Cycle 1 
Day 1 infusion (see Section 4.2.3). The administration of the study drug is approximately 1-
1.5 hours in duration and will vary slightly depending on the dose. The table below provides 
examples of infusion rate calculations.  
 
If an infusional reaction occurs, the infusion should be stopped and supportive care given as per 
institutional guidelines. Anaphylactic precautions should be observed during IMGN901 
administration. Patients should be monitored for at least 1 hour after completion of the infusion. 
See Section 5.4.4 for management and dose modification guidelines for infusional reactions. 
 
Drug doses should be adjusted based on the BSA calculated from height and weight measured 
within 7 days prior to the beginning of each cycle.  
 
Note: Pretreatment use of acetaminophen and/or diphenhydramine may be considered as per 
Investigator’s routine practice. If provided, it is recommended that these agents be administered 30 
to 60 minutes prior to the start of the IMGN901 infusion.  
 
IMGN901 Infusion Rate Calculation Examples Cycles 2-17 (Dose Level 1 (110 mg/m2/dose)) 
 
Example 
# 
Patient demographics 
Infusion rate calculations 
(0.06 mg/kg/min) 
Total Infusion 
Duration 
1 
Weight – 12 kg  
BSA – 0.52 m2  
IMGN901 dose = 57 mg 
0.06 mg/kg/min x 12 kg  
= 0.72 mg/min   
 
57 mg : 0.72 mg/min = 79.2 min 
79.2 min 
2 
Weight – 30 kg 
BSA – 1.1 m2 
IMGN901 dose = 121 mg 
0.06 mg/kg/min x 30 kg  
= 1.8 mg/min  
 
121 mg : 1.8 mg/min =  67.2 min  
67.2 min 
3 
Weight – 77 kg 
BSA – 1.92 m2 
IMGN901 dose = 211 mg 
0.06 mg/kg/min x 77 kg 
 = 3 mg/min (max rate) 
 
211 mg : 3 mg/min = 70.3 min  
70.3 min 
 
Dexamethasone: PO or IV 
Days: 0 and 7 
Dose: 4 mg/m2/dose (max dose 10 mg) BID (i.e., total daily dose = 8 mg/m2/day) 
 
On the day prior to administration of IMGN901, patients should receive dexamethasone twice a 
day (BID). The administration of dexamethasone BID 1 day prior to IMGN901 in patients with 
diabetes may be omitted at the discretion of the Investigator. Additionally, modifications in 

  
THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY 
ADVL1522 
36 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Cycles 2-17 
dexamethasone dosing such as the elimination or reduction of doses may be taken if a patient is 
shown to be intolerant of full dosing. 
 
 
Dexamethasone: IV 
Days: 1 and 8 
Dose: 4 mg/m2/dose (max dose 10 mg)  
On the day of infusion, patients should receive dexamethasone approximately one hour prior to the 
first chemotherapy infusion. Additionally, modifications in dexamethasone dosing such as the 
elimination or reduction of doses may be taken if a patient is shown to be intolerant of full dosing. 
 
See Section 5.0 for Dose Modifications based on Toxicities, including specific criteria for 
Day 8 IMGN901 infusions.  
 
Following completion of this cycle, the next cycle starts on Day 22 or when patient has again met 
laboratory parameters as defined in eligibility Section 3.2.5 (whichever occurs later). 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
37 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
5.0 
DEFINITIONS AND DOSE MODIFICATIONS FOR TOXICITY 
 
5.1 
Dose Modifications for Day 8 Dosing due to Toxicity on Day 8 
 
5.1.1 
Hematological Toxicity (All Age Cohorts) 
Patients who have Grade 4 neutropenia or platelets < 75,000/µL on Day 8 will 
have their IMGN901 dose (and Day 7 and 8 dexamethasone doses if not yet given) 
withheld. If the toxicity resolves to ANC ≥ 750/µL and platelets ≥ 75,000/µL 
(transfusion independent) by Day 11, the dose may be given with appropriately 
timed dexamethasone support as is feasible and future doses should not be reduced. 
If the toxicity does not resolve to ANC ≥ 750/µL and platelets ≥ 75,000/µL by 
Day 11, the dose will be omitted and this will be considered a DLT. Patients should 
receive subsequent cycles of drug but at the next lower dose level. Patients who 
require that their Day 8 dose be omitted for Grade 4 neutropenia or platelets 
< 75,000/µL after an initial dose reduction should have all future Day 8 doses 
omitted. 
 
Patients who meet hematological DLT criteria as defined in Section 5.2.2 on Day 8 
will have their Day 8 dose (and Day 7 and 8 dexamethasone doses if not yet given) 
omitted. Patients should receive subsequent cycles of drug but at the next lower 
dose level. Patients who require that their Day 8 dose be omitted for hematologic 
DLT as defined in Section 5.2.2 after an initial dose reduction should have all 
future Day 8 doses omitted. 
 
Patients who require more than 2 dose reductions must be removed from protocol 
therapy. 
 
5.1.2 
Non-Hematological Toxicity  
Patients who have Grade 3 or Grade 4 non-hematological toxicity attributable to 
the study drug prior to the Day 8 dose (with the exception of the DLT exclusions 
in Section 5.2.1.1) will be considered to have had a DLT. If the toxicity resolves 
to meet eligibility or ≤ Grade 2 (if not part of eligibility criteria) by Day 8, the dose 
(along with dexamethasone support) may be given but at the next lower dose level. 
If the toxicity does not resolve by Day 11, the dose (along with dexamethasone 
support) will be omitted. Patients should receive subsequent cycles of drug but 
with dose modifications according to Section 5.4. 
 
Patients who require more than 2 dose reductions must be removed from protocol 
therapy. 
 
All dose modifications should be based on the worst preceding toxicity. 
 
5.2 
Definition of Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) 
DLT will be defined as any of the following events that are at least possibly, probably or 
definitely attributable to IMGN901. Dose-limiting hematological and non-hematological 
toxicities are defined differently.  
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
38 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
5.2.1 
Non-Hematological Dose-Limiting Toxicity 
 
5.2.1.1 Any Grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity attributable to the 
investigational drug with the specific exclusion of: 
 
• Grade 3 nausea and vomiting 
• Grade 3 ALT/AST elevation that returns to Grade ≤ 1 or baseline prior 
to the time for the next treatment cycle. Note: For the purposes of this 
trial the ULN for ALT is defined as 45 U/L. 
• Grade 3 fever or infection 
• Grade 3 hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia and/or 
hypomagnesemia responsive to oral supplementation. 
• Peripheral neuropathy Grade 3 for ≤ 7 days 
 
5.2.1.2 Non-hematological toxicity that causes a delay of ≥ 14 days between 
treatment cycles. 
 
5.2.1.3 Grade 2 allergic reactions that necessitate discontinuation of study drug 
will not be considered a dose-limiting toxicity. 
 
5.2.2 
Hematological Dose-Limiting Toxicity 
 
5.2.2.1 
Definition of a Hematological Dose-Limiting Toxicity for Patients 
without Bone Marrow Involvement at Enrollment  
 
• Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurring in conjunction with Grade 3 
bleeding (CTCAE terms hemorrhage or epistaxis) 
• Grade 4 neutropenia for > 7 days 
• Platelet count < 20,000/µL on 2 separate days, or requiring a platelet 
transfusion on 2 separate days, within a 7 day period  
• Myelosuppression that causes a delay of ≥ 14 days between treatment 
cycles 
• Any Grade 5 hematological toxicity.  
 
5.3 
Dose Modifications for Hematological Toxicity 
 
5.3.1 
Patients who have dose-limiting thrombocytopenia should receive subsequent 
cycles at the next lower dose level. Patients who require that their Day 8 dose be 
omitted for platelets < 75,000 µL after an initial dose reduction should have all 
future Day 8 doses omitted.  
 
5.3.2 
Patients who have dose-limiting neutropenia (Grade 4 neutropenia of > 7 days 
duration or delay in the start of the next cycle for > 14 days due to neutropenia) 
with no other dose-limiting toxicity should receive the same dose in the next cycle 
with myeloid growth factor support administered the next day after the Day 8 dose 
of IMGN901 is given. [Note: Patients MUST NOT receive prophylactic myeloid 
growth factor in the first cycle of therapy.] If dose-limiting neutropenia recurs after 
myeloid growth factor is added, then the patient should be given the next lower 
dose level followed by myeloid growth factor support beginning the next day after 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
39 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
the Day 8 dose of IMGN901 is given for subsequent cycles. Patients who 
experience dose-limiting neutropenia after the addition of myeloid growth factor 
and one dose reduction must have all future Day 8 doses omitted.  
 
5.3.3 
Patients who experience dose-limiting hematological toxicity after a single dose 
reduction (and the addition of myeloid growth factor if the DLT is neutropenia) 
must have all future Day 8 doses omitted. 
 
5.3.4 
Patients who experience dose-limiting hematological toxicity in cycles after Day 8 
doses were required to be omitted as above must be removed from protocol 
therapy. 
 
5.4 
Dose Modifications for Non-Hematological Toxicity  
 
5.4.1 
Patients who have any dose-limiting non hematological toxicity (as defined in 
Section 5.2.1) that returns to eligibility lab requirements within 14 days after the 
planned start of the next treatment cycle may continue on study but should receive 
subsequent doses at the next lower dose level. Peripheral neuropathy must resolve 
to Grade 2 or lower following Grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy prior to 
resumption of therapy, but it does not need to resolve to eligibility criteria. 
 
5.4.2 
If non-hematological dose-limiting toxicity recurs at the reduced dose, the patient 
must have all future Day 8 doses omitted. 
 
5.4.3 
Patients who experience dose-limiting non-hematological toxicity in cycles after 
Day 8 doses were required to be omitted as above must be removed from protocol 
therapy. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
40 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
5.4.4 
For patients who have allergic or acute infusional reactions to IMGN901 therapy 
modifications based on grade should be as follows:  
Infusion 
reactions and 
delayed 
infusion-related 
reactions  
Any potential infusion reaction should be classified based upon 
severity and time of onset relative to the infusion and reported as an 
infusion reaction and the underlying symptoms on the AE CRF. 
Mild or moderate 
(Grade 1-2) 
• Grade 1: Slow infusion rate by 50% and 
monitor patient for worsening of condition. 
Future infusions should be given at the 50% 
rate. 
 
• Grade 2: Stop infusion; symptom control as 
per institutional guidelines (e.g., narcotics, 
IV fluids). Give diphenhydramine 0.5-
1 mg/kg (max 50 mg IV) and may consider 
additional hydrocortisone 1-2 mg/kg (max 
250 mg IV) or dexamethasone 4 mg/m2 
(max 10 mg IV or PO). Resume infusion at 
50% of the prior rate once the reaction has 
decreased to ≤ Grade 1. Monitor patient for 
worsening condition. Discontinue 
IMGN901 treatment if condition worsens. 
For subsequent doses, add diphenhydramine 
0.5-1 mg/kg (max 50 mg IV) to the 
premedication regimen and infuse at 50% 
rate. 
Severe or life-
threatening:  
(Grade 3-4) 
• Grade 3: Stop infusion immediately and 
disconnect the infusion tubing. Administer 
bronchodilators for bronchospasms, and 
other medications (e.g., epinephrine, 
Normal Saline) as medically indicated. 
Hospital admission should be considered. 
For subsequent doses, add 
diphenhydramine 0.5-1 mg/kg (max 50 mg 
IV) to the premedication regimen and 
infuse at 50% rate. 
• Grade 4: Discontinue IMGN901. Treat per 
institutional guidelines. 
*NOTE: Infusional reactions usually occur during or within 
24 hours of the drug administration. If infusional reactions are 
suspected more than 24 hours after the dosing of IMGN901, the 
patients should be treated as per institutional guidelines and the 
study chair should be notified. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
41 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
 
6.0 
DRUG INFORMATION 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
42 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
43 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
44 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.1.6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
45 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
6.2 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
46 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
47 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
48 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
7.0 
EVALUATIONS/MATERIAL AND DATA TO BE ACCESSIONED 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.1 
End of Therapy & Follow-up 
 
 
STUDIES TO BE OBTAINED 
End of Therapy 
History 
X 
Physical exam with VS 
X 
Ht, Wt, BSA 
X 
Performance status 
X 
Pregnancy test 
X 
CBC, differential, platelets 
X 
Electrolytes including Ca++, PO4, Mg++ 
X 
Creatinine, SGPT, total bilirubin 
X 
Tumor disease evaluation 
X 
 
See COG Late Effects Guidelines for recommended post treatment follow-up:  
http://www.survivorshipguidelines.org/ 
 
Note: Follow-up data must be submitted in accordance with the Case Report Forms (CRFs) 
schedule. 
 
7.2 
Correlative Biology Studies 
 
7.2.1 
Pharmacokinetics  
 
Currently PK is optional for all patients. 
 
Pharmacokinetics was required for the first 6 patients enrolled at COG Consortium 
(Phase 1) sites. 
 
 
7.2.1.1 
Description of Studies and Assay 
Peripheral blood samples will be collected for the purpose of 
determining 1) IMGN901 conjugate, 2) total antibody which measures 
the concentration of both free huN901 antibody and conjugated 
antibody, 3) free DM1 maytansinoid, and 4) immunogenicity (ADA). 
Concentrations of IMGN901 conjugate, total antibody, and ADA will 
be measured using validated ELISA assays. Free DM1 maytansinoid 
will be measured using a validated LC/MS/MS assay. 
 
7.2.1.2 
Sample Collection and Schedule  
Timing of protocol therapy administration, response assessment studies, and surgical interventions are 
based on schedules derived from the experimental design or on established standards of care. Minor 
unavoidable departures (up to 72 hours) from protocol directed therapy and/or disease evaluations (and 
up to 1 week for surgery) for valid clinical, patient and family logistical, or facility, procedure and/or 
anesthesia scheduling issues are acceptable per COG administrative Policy 5.14 (except where 
explicitly prohibited within the protocol). This policy does NOT apply to eligibility requirements; but 
to therapy and evaluations post consent and post the start of protocol directed care. 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
49 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Peripheral blood samples for IMGN901 conjugate, total antibody, and 
ADA measurements will be collected in red top vacutainer tubes. Blood 
samples for free DM1 maytansinoid will be collected in vacutainer tubes 
containing heparin (green top) or EDTA (lavender top) and chemical 
additives to maintain DM1 maytansinoid stability. All samples should 
be drawn from a site distant from the infusion. The exact time that the 
sample is drawn along with the exact time that the drug is administered 
is to be recorded on the Pharmacokinetic Transmittal form in Rave.  
 
Peripheral blood samples will be collected at the following time points 
during Cycle 1:  
 
o Day 1: Pretreatment, end of infusion, and 2 hrs, 6 hrs, 24 hrs, and 
72-120 hrs after the end of the infusion. 
 
o Day 8: Pretreatment, end of infusion, and 2 hrs and 6 hrs after the 
end of the infusion. 
 
7.2.1.3 
Sample Processing 
IMGN901 conjugate, total antibody, and ADA: 
a. Draw 3 mL of blood in red top or tiger top vacuum tube (no 
anticoagulant) at each indicated time point. 
b. Allow the tubes to remain at room temperature for 30 to 
60 minutes to clot. 
c. Centrifuge tubes at 1500 RPM for 15 minutes at room 
temperature. 
d. Transfer serum to a separate tube and store in a -70oC freezer. 
 
Free DM1 maytansinoid: 
a. Draw 3 mL of blood in chilled vacutainer tubes containing 
heparin (green top) or EDTA (lavender top) and chemical 
additives at each indicated time point. 
b. Invert tube 8-12 times and place in an ice water bath. 
c. Centrifuge at 2,000 rpm for 10 min in a refrigerated centrifuge 
set at 4°C. 
d. Following centrifugation, transfer plasma to a separate tube and 
store in a -70oC freezer (within 30 minutes of collection). 
 
7.2.1.4 
Sample Shipping: 
1. Day 1 and Day 8 PK samples should be batched, maintained at  
-70oC until shipment, and shipped together for each patient at the end 
of Cycle 1. Include a printed copy of the completed Pharmacokinetic 
Transmittal form (in Rave).  
 
2. Place samples in a cryobox. Ensure the cryobox is closed and 
remains so in transit using shipping tape. Place the cryobox in a 
shipping container with sufficient dry ice to maintain samples at  
-20oC for at least 72 hours.  
 
3. Each shipment should be prepared in accordance with IATA 
regulations.  

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
50 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
4. Frozen samples should be shipped via overnight FedEx, Monday 
through Wednesday. No shipments should be made later than 
Wednesday of any given week.  
 
5. On the day of shipment: Email a copy of the completed 
Pharmacokinetic Transmittal form (in Rave) and the tracking 
number to Dr. Joel Reid (reid.joel@mayo.edu) and copy the 
ADVL1522 COG Study Assigned Research Coordinator on the 
email. 
 
6. Ship the PK samples to the following address  
 
Attention: Dr. Joel M. Reid 
Department of Oncology 
Mayo Clinic 
Room 19-151, Gonda Building 
200 First Street SW 
Rochester, MN 55905. 
Phone (507) 284-0822 
Fax 
(507) 284-3906 
Email: reid.joel@mayo.edu 
 
7.2.2 
Peripheral Blood Cells CD56 
 
Peripheral blood cells CD56 count analyses will be performed for all patients 
participating in the optional pharmacokinetic studies.  
 
7.2.2.1 
Summary of CD56 absolute count in whole blood: 
CD56-positive cells in peripheral blood will be measured using a 
MiltenyiMACSQuant 10 flow cytometer (MiltenyiBiotec) and a lyse-
no-wash staining technique. The MACSQuant Instrument employs a 
volumetric sample uptake system, which allows for direct determination 
of an absolute cell count of the sample. Fifty microliters (µL) of EDTA 
blood will be labeled with 10 µL of anti-CD56 APC and 15 µL of anti-
CD45 FITC antibodies (BD Biosciences). The addition of CD45, a pan-
leukocyte marker, allows for separation of debris and red blood cells 
from the leukocytes, and makes gating on the lymphocyte population 
more accurate. The blood is incubated with the antibodies and lysed with 
925 µL of FACSLyse red blood cell lysis solution. The sample is then 
analyzed on the MACSQuant flow cytometer using a program that 
yields both the percent of CD56-positive cells and the absolute number 
of positive cells per milliliter and per microliter. 
 
7.2.2.2 
Sample collection and Schedule: 
Peripheral blood samples are collected in an EDTA tube on Day 1 and 
Day 8 of Cycle 1 prior to (within 12 hours of starting) IMGN901 
administration. Minimum volume 1 mL. All samples should be drawn 
from a site distant from the infusion. 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
51 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
7.2.2.3 
Sample Shipping 
a. Ship whole blood at room temperature along with a printed copy of 
completed Study Specimen Transmittal-Peripheral Blood CD56 form 
(in Rave). Note that extreme temperatures (hot or cold) can adversely 
affect shipped blood specimens. In winter when shipping 
temperatures can be far below freezing, it is best to ship with a warm 
pack or room-temperature cold packs in a well-insulated, double box 
(Styrofoam interior box/cardboard exterior box). 
 
b. Specimens may be shipped Monday through Thursday to be 
received Tuesday through Friday.  
Ship using FedEx First Overnight delivery. Specimen must be 
received in the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. We cannot 
accept deliveries on Saturdays or Sundays. 
 
c. Shipping address 
Ship FedEx First Overnight to: 
Attn: Sue Vergamini  
CCHMC-Julie Beach 
DIL- Room R2328 
3333 Burnet Ave. 
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3039 
 
d. Contact person:  
Sue Vergamini 
Phone: 513) 636-6903 
Email: sue.vergamini@cchmc.org 
 
7.2.3 
Tumor CD56 Expression (required) 
CD56 expression will be assessed using standard immunohistochemistry. CD56 
antibody, clone 123C3 from Ventana will be used. The procedure will be a fully 
automated immunohistochemical staining, performed at a Ventana Benchmark 
Ultra staining system and following a protocol clinically validated at Lurie 
Children’s Hospital (Chicago). 
 
Tumor cells will be recorded as either negative or positive. Only membranous 
expression will be considered. Positive staining will be interpreted qualitatively as 
the presence of coarse granular staining of the cell membrane in a circumferential 
pattern. 
 
Scoring: 0-3+ according to percentage of positive cells (as defined above) 
0-10% positive cells: 0 
10-25% positive cells: 1+ 
25-50% positive cells: 2+ 
> 50% positive cells: 3+ 
 
Controls: 
• 3+ blastemal Wilms tumor as positive control 
• Patient’s tumor sample not treated with CD56 antibody as negative control. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
52 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
7.2.3.1 
Sample Collection  
5 unstained slides of pre-treated tumor should be prepared on positively 
charged (“plus”) slides for immunohistochemistry. 
 
7.2.3.2 
Sample Shipping 
Slides should be shipped by regular mail in protective slide mailers along 
with a printed copy of the completed Specimen Transmittal-Unstained 
Tumor CD56 form (in Rave). 
 
7.2.3.3 
Shipping address 
See the Correlative Studies Shipment sheet on the ADVL1522 protocol 
web page for shipping account numbers.  
 
Ship Slides to:  
Mariana Cajaiba, MD 
Department of Pathology 
Ann and Robert H Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago 
225 East Chicago Avenue – Room 08-413 
Chicago, IL 60611 
 
7.2.3.4 
Contact 
Please contact Dr. Mariana Cajaiba at (312) 227-3963 or email 
mcajaiba@luriechildrens.org for questions.  
 
7.3 
Central Review 
The pertinent imaging studies (CT, MRI—and MIBG for neuroblastoma patients with 123I-
MIBG positive lesions at start of therapy) of those patients who respond to therapy or have 
long term stable disease on protocol therapy will be centrally reviewed. COG Operations 
Center will notify the Imaging Research Center of any patient requiring central review. 
The Imaging Research Center will then request that the treating institution forward the 
requested images for central review. The central image evaluation results will be entered 
into Rave for review by the COG Operations Center and for data analysis.  
 
The images are to be forwarded electronically to the Imaging Research Center at Children’s 
Hospital Los Angeles via the ImageInBox. 
 
COG institutions that are not connected to the Imaging Research Center via the 
ImageInBox can send the images on CD ROM, DVD or USB flash drive for central review. 
Submitted imaging studies should be clearly marked with the COG patient ID, study 
number (ADVL1522) and date, and shipped to Syed Aamer at the address below:  
 
Syed Aamer, MBBS, CCRP 
Administrator, Imaging Research Center  
Children’s Hospital Los Angeles  
4650 Sunset Boulevard, MS # 81 
Los Angeles, CA 90027 
Phone: (323) 361-3898 
Fax: 
(323) 361-3054 
Email: saamer@chla.usc.edu 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
53 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
8.0 
CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM PROTOCOL THERAPY AND OFF STUDY 
CRITERIA  
 
8.1 
Criteria for Removal from Protocol Therapy 
a) Relapse/progressive disease. 
b) Adverse Events requiring removal from protocol therapy, as stated in Section 5.0. 
c) Patients who receive concurrent anticancer or investigational therapy, as stated in 
Section 4.1.5. 
d) Refusal of further protocol therapy by patient/parent/guardian. 
e) Completion of planned protocol therapy. 
f) Physician determines it is in patient’s best interest. 
g)  Repeat eligibility studies (if required) are outside the parameters required for 
eligibility. 
h) Non-compliance that in the opinion of the investigator does not allow for ongoing 
participation. 
i) Patients who develop a second malignant neoplasm. 
j) Pregnancy. 
k) Breastfeeding. 
 
Patients who are removed from protocol therapy (except for 8.1.g) are to be followed until 
they meet the criteria for Off Study (see below). Follow-up data will be required unless patient 
is taken off study. 
 
 
8.2 
Off Study Criteria 
a) Death. 
b) Lost to follow-up. 
c) Entry into another COG study with tumor therapeutic intent (e.g., at recurrence). 
d) Patient did not receive protocol treatment after study enrollment. 
e) Withdrawal of consent for any further data submission. 
f) The fifth anniversary of study entry. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
54 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
9.0 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS  
 
9.1 
Sample Size and Study Duration 
 
9.1.1 
Patient Accrual and Expected Duration of the Study:  
Three disease strata have been identified for reporting upon completion of 
evaluation of the particular disease stratum (‘primary disease groups’). These 
disease strata are: (1) Wilms; (2) rhabdomyosarcoma; and (3) neuroblastoma. The 
evaluation rule is described in Section 9.2 below. 
 
In addition to the three main strata, enrollment into each of the following tumor 
groups (‘secondary strata’): (4) pleuropulmonary blastoma, (5) malignant 
peripheral nerve sheath tumor, and (6) synovial sarcoma; will be open to accrual.  
 
When the evaluation of the three primary disease groups is complete, enrollment 
to the study will be terminated unless the DVL committee leadership indicates 
further enrollment on the secondary strata is warranted. 
 
If two of the three primary disease strata (Wilms, rhabdomyosarcoma, and 
neuroblastoma) have met their accrual and one remains open, the Cancer Therapy 
Evaluation Program (CTEP) and the ADVL1522 Investigators will discuss the 
study timeline. 
 
Based on the enrollment rates prior to activation of Amendment #1, the following 
entry rates for the various tumors under study can be expected: 
 
Disease Group/Strata 
 
 
Patients/Year 
1) Wilms tumor 
 
 
 
18 
2) Rhabdomyosarcoma   
 
 
14 
3) Neuroblastoma 
 
 
9 
 
For Wilms: 10 patients enrolled prior to activation of Amendment #1. Accrual of 
an additional 6 patients is expected to take approximately 4 months. 
 
For rhabdomyosarcoma: 8 patients enrolled prior to activation of Amendment #1. 
Accrual of an additional 8 patients is expected to take approximately 7 months. 
 
For neuroblastoma:5 patents enrolled prior to activation of Amendment #1. 
Accrual of an additional 11 patients is expected to take approximately 14.5 months.  
 
Allowing for roughly a 15% rate of ineligible/inevaluable patients, each stratum 
could need to enroll up to 19 patients to allow for 16 evaluable patients. 
 
The study will likely require 2 to 3 years for sufficient patient enrollments to 
evaluate IMGN901 in the three primary disease groups. If activity is detected in 
any category, further trials in subcategories of that category may be conducted at 
the discretion of the Developmental Therapeutics Steering and study committees. 
A maximum of 114 patients is anticipated. 
 
9.2 
Definition of Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)/ Tolerable Dose 
The initial MTD defined in the adult trial is 112 mg/m2/dose, approximated herein as dose 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
55 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
level 1 at 110 mg/m2/dose. If there are < 2 DLTs in the first 6 patients treated at dose level 1 
during the first cycle of therapy, this will be considered the RP2D and all subsequent 
patients will be enrolled at this dose level. If the MTD has been exceeded at Dose Level 1 
as noted from the first six patients enrolled (≥ 2 DLTs at least possibly attributed to 
IMGN901), then the subsequent patients will be treated at Dose Level -1. If there are 
<2 DLTs in the first 6 patients treated at dose level -1, this will be considered the RP2D 
and all subsequent patients will be enrolled at this dose level. A dose level -2 has been 
included in the proposal for purposes of providing a dose for those patients potentially 
accrued at dose level -1 (in the event it becomes the RP2D) and then subsequently requiring 
a dose reduction due to toxicity. 
 
Delayed Toxicity Monitoring: We will monitor all serious adverse events on an ongoing basis. 
Analyses will be incorporated to screen for excess delayed peripheral neuropathy specifically.  
 
A patient will be considered for toxicity monitoring if the patient is eligible and one of the 
following occurs: (1) completes one cycle of protocol therapy; (2) dies on protocol therapy 
for a reason considered possibly, probably, or likely related to protocol therapy; or (3) is 
removed from protocol therapy because of an adverse experience possibly, probably, or 
likely related to one of the agents. A toxicity-evaluable patient will be considered in the 
analysis during the interval from study enrollment until protocol therapy is terminated or, 
a toxicity-event is observed, whichever occurs first. A toxicity-evaluable patient will be 
considered to have experienced an excessive toxicity event if: (1) the patient dies on 
protocol therapy for a reason considered possibly, probably, or likely related to protocol 
therapy; or (2) experiences a dose-limiting toxicity.  
 
The analytic unit for monitoring for excessive toxicity will be the patient-cycle: Each cycle 
where an excessive toxicity event is observed or where the patient receives the agent and 
completes the full cycle of treatment will be considered in the analysis. If there is 
overwhelming evidence that the dose selected for this trial has a per-cycle-excessive 
peripheral neuropathy (Grade 3 or higher) probability of more than 1/3, such information 
will be presented to the DSMB and consideration will be given to modifying any defined 
RP2D to one dose level lower.  
 
We will use a Bayesian rule to monitor for excessive peripheral neuropathy.32,33 We will 
assume a beta prior distribution with α = 0.6 and β = 1.2. At least once per month, we will 
calculate the posterior probability (given the data) that the probability of Grade 3 or higher 
peripheral neuropathy (“Excessive PN”) exceeds the 1/3 threshold:  
 
𝑃𝑃(𝑝𝑝Excessive PN > 1/3 | Data) = න
ቀ𝑛𝑛
𝑥𝑥ቁ𝑝𝑝𝑥𝑥(1 −𝑝𝑝)𝑛𝑛−𝑥𝑥
Γ(1.8)
Γ(0.6)Γ(1.2) 𝑝𝑝−0.4(1 −𝑝𝑝)0.2
∫ቀ𝑛𝑛
𝑥𝑥ቁ𝑞𝑞𝑥𝑥(1 −𝑞𝑞)𝑛𝑛−𝑥𝑥
Γ(1.8)
Γ(0.6)Γ(1.2) 𝑞𝑞−0.4(1 −𝑞𝑞)0.2 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
1
0
 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
1
1/3
 
 
where n is the number of excessive-PN-evaluable cycles and x is the number of such cycles 
on which an excessive PN event is observed. If this posterior probability exceeds 80%, 
such information will be presented to the DSMB and consideration will be given to 
modifying any defined RP2D to one dose level lower. Examples of situations in which this 
rule will indicate excessive toxicity have been noted and are presented below: 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
56 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Number of 
Excessive PN- 
Evaluable Cycles 
Number of Cycles 
with Excessive 
PN Observed 
𝑃𝑃(𝑝𝑝Excessive PN
> 1/3 | Data) 
5 
3 
0.848 
10 
5 
0.834 
15 
7 
0.837 
20 
9 
0.843 
25 
11 
0.852 
30 
13 
0.860 
35 
15 
0.869 
40 
17 
0.876 
 
9.3 
Study Design 
This trial is a multi-strata Phase 2 study of IMGN901. The primary endpoint will be 
objective response by RECIST criteria. As of Amendment #1, each stratum will accrue a 
maximum of 16 evaluable patients. IMGN901 will be identified as having sufficient 
activity for further study in a particular stratum if there are at least 4 responses (PR or CR) 
confirmed by central review. This design will be used for all strata which have not been 
closed prior to the activation of Amendment #1. 
 
We will consider the agent not of sufficient interest for further evaluation in a disease 
category if the true response rate is 15%. (H0 is a true response rate of 15%.) Ha is a true 
response rate of 40%. Each stratum will accrue 16 evaluable patients. Thus, there will be a 
maximum of 96 evaluable patients. If the agent has a true response rate of 15%, the rule 
described herein will identify the agent of sufficient activity for further study with 
probability 0.079 (Type I error). If the agent has a true response rate of 40%, the rule 
described herein will identify the agent of sufficient activity for further study with 
probability 0.833 (power against the alternative hypothesis p = 0.40). In addition to making 
the decision to accept or reject the drug, the final results will be reported after all patients 
have been identified as having a CR, PR, or PD as their response according to protocol-
specified criteria. 
 
Prior to Amendment #1, the trial used a Simon two-stage optimal design in each stratum. 
The best response of disease was examined separately in each stratum. Within each 
stratum, the following two-stage design for 15% response rate vs. 40% response rate with 
α = β = 0.10 was employed: 
 
 
Cumulative Number of Responses 
at the End of the Stage 
Decision 
Stage 1:  
Enter 10 evaluable 
patients  
0 or 1 
 
2 or more 
Terminate the trial for this stratum 
because the agent is ineffective. 
Proceed to Stage 2. 
Stage 2:  
Enter 12 additional 
evaluable patients 
5 or fewer 
 
6 or more 
Terminate the trial for this stratum 
because the agent is ineffective. 
Terminate the trial for this stratum 
because the agent is effective. 
 
A comparison of the operating characteristics of the single stage and two-stage designs 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
57 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
appears below. 
 
True 
response 
rate 
Simon’s optimal design (10 + 12 [2,6]) 
Single- stage design (16[4]) 
Probability of 
stopping early for 
lack of activity 
Probability of 
identifying agent 
as effective 
Expected number of 
patients accrued 
Probability of identifying 
agent  
as effective 
5% 
0.914 
0.001 
11.03 
0.001 
10% 
0.736 
0.016 
13.17 
0.017 
15% 
0.544 
0.091 
15.47 
0.079 
20% 
0.376 
0.246 
17.49 
0.202 
25% 
0.244 
0.451 
19.07 
0.370 
30% 
0.149 
0.650 
20.21 
0.550 
35% 
0.086 
0.804 
20.97 
0.711 
40% 
0.046 
0.903 
21.44 
0.833 
45% 
0.023 
0.957 
21.72 
0.915 
50% 
0.011 
0.983 
21.87 
0.962 
 
 
9.4 
Methods of Analysis 
Response criteria are described in Section 10.0. A responder is defined as a patient who 
achieves a best response (as defined in Section 10.6) of PR or CR on the study. Response 
rates will be calculated as the percent of evaluable patients who are responders, and 
Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals will be constructed. 
 
Toxicity tables will be constructed to summarize the observed incidence by type of toxicity 
and grade. A patient will be counted only once per cycle for a given toxicity for the worst 
grade of that toxicity reported for that patient. Toxicity information recorded will include 
the type, severity, time of onset, time of resolution, and the probable association with the 
study regimen.  
 
9.5 
Evaluability for Response 
Any eligible patient who receives at least one dose of IMGN901 will be considered 
evaluable for response with the following exception: if a patient receives non-protocol anti-
cancer therapy (including surgery) during the response evaluation period after the patient 
is considered as having a partial or complete response but prior to confirmation of this 
status by tumor imaging and before progressive disease is noted, the individual will be 
considered inevaluable for the response endpoint. Further, patients who stop IMGN901 
after the first evaluation because of toxicities or death will be considered evaluable for the 
response evaluation and will be counted as non-responders for the response endpoint. 
Patients who demonstrate a complete or partial response confirmed by central review will 
be considered to have experienced a response for the application of the rule given in Section 
9.2. The evaluation period for determination of the best response will be 6 treatment cycles. 
All other patients will be considered non-responders. All patients considered to have a 
response (CR or PR) must have imaging studies reviewed centrally at the COG. Centers 
will be notified by the COG about requests for scans of patients with stable disease. See 
Section 7.3 regarding shipping instructions. Preliminary assessment of activity using 
institutionally provided tumor measurements will be entered into CDUS quarterly. The 
central review by COG will be provided as the final reviewed assessment of response when 
such becomes available. 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
58 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
9.6 
Evaluability for Toxicity 
All patients who receive at least one dose of IMGN901 according to protocol guidelines 
and either 1) experience a toxicity, or 2) complete the first cycle with no toxicity, will be 
considered in the evaluation of toxicity. 
 
 
9.7 
Gender and Minority Accrual Estimates  
The gender and minority distribution of the study population is expected to be: 
 
Racial category 
Ethnicity 
Total 
Not Hispanic 
or Latino 
Hispanic or 
Latino 
Female Male Female Male 
American Indian/Alaska Native 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Asian 
1 
4 
0 
0 
5 
Black or African American 
14 
6 
0 
0 
20 
White 
38 
27 
8 
16 
89 
More than one race 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Total 
53 
37 
8 
16 
114 
 
This distribution was derived from the demographic data for patients enrolled on recent COG 
Phase 2 trials ADVL0821 and ADVL0921 with diagnoses among the primary disease groups. 
 
9.8 
Analysis of the Pharmacokinetic Parameters 
A descriptive analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of IMGN901 will be performed 
to define systemic exposure, drug clearance, and other pharmacokinetic parameters. The 
PK parameters will be summarized with simple summary statistics, including means, 
medians, ranges, and standard deviations (if numbers and distribution permit).  
 
9.9 
Analysis of Biological and Correlative Endpoints 
CD56 Expression 
The association between CD56+ expression and response will be evaluated using the exact 
conditional test of proportions (Fisher’s Exact Test). 
 
Pharmacokinetics 
A descriptive analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of IMGN901 will be performed 
to define systemic exposure, drug clearance, and other pharmacokinetic parameters. The 
PK parameters will be summarized with simple summary statistics, including means, 
medians, ranges, and standard deviations (if numbers and distribution permit). 
 
All these analyses will be descriptive and exploratory and hypotheses generating in nature. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
59 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
10.0 
EVALUATION CRITERIA 
 
10.1 
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 
This study will utilize the CTCAE of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) for toxicity and 
performance reporting. The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised CTCAE 
version 4.0 will be utilized for reporting. All appropriate treatment areas should have access 
to a copy of the CTCAE version 4.0, which can be downloaded from the CTEP web site 
(http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm). 
Additionally, toxicities are to be reported on the appropriate case report forms. 
 
10.2 
Response Criteria  
As outlined, patients will be assigned to one of the following categories for assessment of 
response: a) solid tumor and measurable disease (Section 10.3); b) neuroblastoma with MIBG 
positive lesions (Section 10.4); c) neuroblastoma with bone marrow involvement (Section 
10.5); Note: Neuroblastoma patients who do not have MIBG positive lesions or bone marrow 
involvement should be assessed for response as solid tumor patients with measurable or 
evaluable disease.  
 
10.3 
Response Criteria for Patients with Solid Tumors (non-CNS) 
Response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the revised Response 
Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1.) 34 Key points are 
that 5 target lesions are identified and that changes in the largest diameter (unidimensional 
measurement) of the tumor lesions are used in the RECIST v 1.1 criteria. 
 
10.3.1 Measurable Disease  
The presence of at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one 
dimension with the longest diameter at least 10 mm (CT scan slice thickness no 
greater than 5 mm). The investigator will identify up to 5 measurable lesions to be 
followed for response. Previously irradiated lesions must demonstrate clear 
evidence of progression to be considered measurable. 
 
Serial measurements of lesions are to be done with appropriate imaging modalities, 
e.g., CT or MRI. Bone scans cannot be used to measure lesions. The same method 
of assessment is to be used to characterize each identified and reported lesion at 
baseline and during follow-up. 
 
10.3.2 Quantification of Disease Burden 
The sum of the longest diameter (LD) for all target lesions will be calculated and 
reported as the disease measurement. 
 
10.3.3 End-of-Cycle Response 
Note: Please also see Table 1 in Section 10.6. 
 
a) Complete Response (CR)  
Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Normalization of urinary 
catecholamines (for patients with neuroblastoma), immunocytologic findings, 
or other tumor markers if abnormal or elevated at study enrollment.  
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
60 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
b) Partial Response (PR) 
At least a 30% decrease in the disease measurement, taking as reference the 
disease measurement done to confirm measurable disease at study enrollment. 
No new lesions or progression of any non-target measurable lesion. 
 
c) Stable Disease (SD) 
Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify 
for PD taking as reference the smallest disease measurement since the 
treatment started. 
 
d) Progressive Disease (PD)  
At least a 20% increase in the sum of the disease measurements for measurable 
lesions, taking as reference the smallest disease measurement recorded since 
the start of treatment, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. 
 
 
10.3.4 Overall Best Response Assessment  
Each patient will be classified according to their “best response” for the purposes 
of analysis of treatment effect. Best response is determined from the sequence of 
the objective statuses described in Section 10.6 (Tables 1-3). 
 
 
10.4 
Response Criteria for Neuroblastoma Patients with 123I-MIBG Positive Lesions 
10.4.1  MIBG Positive Lesions 
Patients who have a positive MIBG scan at the start of therapy will be evaluable for 
MIBG response. The use of 123I for MIBG imaging is recommended for all scans. If 
this isotope is unavailable at the treating institution, the use of the same radioisotope 
for all MIBG scans for an individual patient is strongly encouraged. 
 
10.4.2 The following criteria will be used to report MIBG response by the treating 
institution: 
• 
Complete Response: Complete resolution of all MIBG positive lesions 
• 
Partial Response: Resolution of at least one MIBG positive lesion, with 
persistence of other MIBG positive lesions. 
• 
Stable Disease: No change in MIBG scan in number of positive lesions (includes 
patients who have same number of positive lesions but decreased density). 
• 
Progressive Disease: Development of new MIBG positive lesions. 
 
10.4.3 The response of MIBG lesions will be assessed on central review using the Curie 
scale as outlined below. Central review responses will be used to assess efficacy 
for study endpoint. See Section 7.3 for details on transferring images to the 
Imaging Research Center. 
 
NOTE: This scoring is NOT required to be done by the treating institution for end 
of course response assessments. 
 
The body is divided into 9 anatomic sectors for osteomedullary lesions, with a 10th 
general sector allocated for any extra-osseous lesion visible on MIBG scan. In each 
region, the lesions are scored as follows. The absolute extension score is graded as:  
0 = no site per segment,  
1 = 1 site per segment,  
2 = more than one site per segment,  
3 = massive involvement (>50% of the segment).  

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
61 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
The absolute score is obtained by adding the score of all the segments. See 
diagram of sectors below: 
 
The relative score is calculated by dividing the absolute score at each time point 
by the corresponding pre-treatment absolute score. The relative score of each 
patient is calculated at each response assessment compared to baseline and 
classified as below: 
1. Complete response: all areas of uptake on MIBG scan completely resolved. 
If morphological evidence of tumor cells in bone marrow biopsy or aspiration 
is present at enrollment, no tumor cells can be detected by routine morphology 
on two subsequent bilateral bone marrow aspirates and biopsies done at least 3 
weeks apart to be considered a Complete Response. 
2. Partial response: Relative score ≤ 0.2 (lesions almost disappeared) to ≤ 0.5 
(lesions strongly reduced). 
3. Stable disease: Relative score > 0.5 (lesions weakly but significantly reduced) 
to 1.0 (lesions not reduced). 
4. Progressive disease: New lesions on MIBG scan  
 
10.4.4 Overall Best Response Assessment 
Each patient will be classified according to their “best response” for the purposes 
of analysis of treatment effect. Best response is determined from the sequence of 
the objective statutes described in Table 3 in Section 10.6. 
 
10.4.5 Response Criteria for Patients Enrolled with Evaluable Disease on Bone Scan 
Patients who have a positive bone scan at the start of therapy will be evaluable for 
bone scan response. NOTE: Bone Scans are not required imaging tests on this 
study. However, if a bone scan is performed at baseline and on subsequent 
evaluations, the following criteria will be used for assessment of response. 
 
Bone scan response is defined as: 
• Complete Response (CR): all areas of uptake on bone scan are 
completely resolved and no new lesions have occurred. 
• Progressive Disease (PD): new lesions on bone scan. 
• Non-CR, Non-PD: neither complete response, nor progressive disease. 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
62 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
10.5 
Response Criteria for Neuroblastoma Patients with Bone Marrow Involvement  
 
10.5.1 Bone Marrow Involvement  
Note: patients with bone marrow as the ONLY site of disease are not eligible for 
this study. Response criteria in this section are intended to be used when assessing 
marrow involvement as a component of overall response. 
 
Histologic analysis at the local institution of marrow tumor cell involvement is 
required for patients with a history of marrow involvement. Marrow aspirate and 
biopsy should be evaluated at baseline and every 2 cycles thereafter. Note: If 
progressive disease is documented by RECIST criteria using tumor measurements 
or by MIBG scan, then a repeat BM is not needed to confirm PD. 
 
 Complete Response: No tumor cells detectable by routine morphology on 
2 consecutive bilateral bone marrow aspirates and biopsies performed at least 
3 weeks apart. Normalization of urinary catecholamines or other tumor 
markers if elevated at study enrollment.  
 Progressive Disease:  
o Patients who enroll with neuroblastoma in bone marrow by morphology 
have progressive disease if there is a doubling in the amount of tumor in 
the marrow AND a minimum of 25% tumor in bone marrow by 
morphology. (For example, a patient entering with 5% tumor in marrow 
by morphology must increase to ≥ 25% tumor to have progressive disease; 
a patient entering with 30% tumor must increase to > 60%). 
o Patients who enroll without evidence of neuroblastoma in bone marrow 
will be defined as progressive disease if tumor is detected in 2 consecutive 
bone marrow biopsies or aspirations done at least 3 weeks apart or the 
treating physician determines that a single positive bone marrow 
indicates clinical progression of disease.  
 Stable Disease: Persistence of tumor in bone marrow that does not meet the 
criteria for either complete response or progressive disease. 
 
10.5.2 Overall Best Response Assessment 
Each patient will be classified according to their “best response” for the purposes 
of analysis of treatment effect. Best response is determined from the sequence of 
the objective statutes described in Section 10.6. 
 
10.6 
Best Response (Solid Tumors) 
Two objective status determinations of disease status, by CT or MRI, obtained on two 
consecutive determinations, separated by at least a 3 week time period, are required to 
determine the patient’s overall best response. Two objective status determinations of CR 
before progression are required for best response of CR. Two determinations of PR or 
better before progression, but not qualifying for a CR, are required for a best response of 
PR. Two determinations of stable/no response or better before progression, but not 
qualifying as CR or PR, are required for a best response of stable/no response; if the first 
objective status is unknown, only one such determination is required. Patients with an 
objective status of progression on or before the second evaluations (the first evaluation is 
the first radiographic evaluation after treatment has been administered) will have a best 
response of progressive disease. Best response is unknown if the patient does not qualify 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
63 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
for a best response of progressive disease and if all objective statuses after the first 
determination and before progression are unknown. 
 
 
 
Table 1: Sequences of objective statuses with corresponding best response. 
1st Status 
2nd Status 
3rd Status 
Best Response 
Progression 
 
 
Progressive disease 
Stable, PR, CR 
Progression 
 
Progressive disease 
Unknown 
Progression 
 
Progressive disease 
Stable 
Stable 
Progression 
Stable 
Stable, Unknown 
PR, CR 
Progression 
Stable 
Stable, Unknown 
Unknown 
Progression 
Unknown 
PR 
PR 
Progression 
PR 
PR 
CR 
Progression 
PR 
PR, CR 
Unknown 
Progression 
Unknown 
CR 
CR 
Progression 
CR 
Unknown 
Stable 
Progression 
Stable 
 
 
Table 2: Overall Response for Patients with Neuroblastoma and Measurable Disease 
CT or MRI 
MIBG 
Bone Scan 
Bone Marrow 
Catechol 
Overall 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
PD 
SD 
CR/PR/SD 
Non-PD 
Non-PD 
Any 
SD 
PR 
CR/PR 
Non-PD 
Non-PD 
Any 
PR 
CR/PR 
PR 
Non-PD 
Non-PD 
Any 
PR 
CR 
CR 
Non-PD 
Non-PD 
Elevated 
PR 
CR 
CR 
CR 
CR 
Normal 
CR 
 
Table 3: Overall Response Evaluation for Neuroblastoma Patients and MIBG Positive Disease 
Only 
Since patients in Stratum 3 may be enrolled without disease measurable by CT or MRI, any 
new or newly identified lesion by CT or MRI that occurs during therapy would be considered 
progressive disease. 
MIBG 
CT or MRI 
Bone Scan 
Bone Marrow 
Catechol 
Overall 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
New Lesion 
Any 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Any 
PD 
Any 
PD 
SD 
No New Lesion 
Non-CR, Non-PD 
Non-PD 
Any 
SD 
PR 
No New Lesion 
Non-CR, Non-PD 
Non-PD 
Any 
PR 
CR 
No New Lesion 
Non-CR, Non-PD 
Non-PD 
Elevated 
PR 
CR 
No New Lesion 
CR 
CR 
Normal 
CR 
 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
64 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
11.0 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS  
11.1 
Purpose 
Adverse event data collection and reporting, which are required as part of every clinical 
trial, are done to ensure the safety of patients enrolled in the studies as well as those who 
will enroll in future studies using similar agents. Certain adverse events must be reported 
in an expedited manner to allow for timelier monitoring of patient safety and care. The 
following sections provide information about expedited reporting. 
 
11.2 
Determination of reporting requirements 
Reporting requirements may include the following considerations: 1) whether the patient 
has received an investigational or commercial agent; 2) the characteristics of the adverse 
event including the grade (severity), the relationship to the study therapy (attribution), and 
the prior experience (expectedness) of the adverse event; 3) the Phase (1, 2, or 3) of the 
trial; and 4) whether or not hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization was associated 
with the event.  
 
An investigational agent is a protocol drug administered under an Investigational New 
Drug Application (IND). In some instances, the investigational agent may be available 
commercially, but is actually being tested for indications not included in the approved 
package label.  
 
Commercial agents are those agents not provided under an IND but obtained instead from 
a commercial source. The NCI, rather than a commercial distributor, may on some 
occasions distribute commercial agents for a trial. 
 
When a study includes both investigational and commercial agents, the following rules 
apply: 
• 
Concurrent administration: When an investigational agent is used in 
combination with a commercial agent, the combination is considered to be 
investigational and expedited reporting of adverse events would follow the 
guidelines for investigational agents. 
• 
Sequential administration: When a study includes an investigational agent 
and a commercial agent on the same study arm, but the commercial agent is 
given for a period of time prior to starting the investigational agent, 
expedited reporting of adverse events that occur prior to starting the 
investigational agent would follow the guidelines for commercial agents. 
Once therapy with the investigational agent is initiated, all expedited 
reporting of adverse events follow the investigational agent reporting 
guidelines. 
 
11.3 
Expedited Reporting Requirements – Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) 
To ensure compliance with these regulations/this guidance, as IND/IDE sponsor, NCI 
requires that AEs be submitted according to the timeframes in the AE reporting tables 
assigned to the protocol, using the CTEP Adverse Event Reporting System (CTEP-
AERSCTEP-AERS). 
 
Any AE that is serious qualifies for expedited reporting. An AE is defined as any 
untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not 
considered drug related. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any adverse drug event 
(experience) occurring at any dose that results in ANY of the following outcomes: 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
65 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
1) Death. 
2) A life-threatening adverse drug experience. 
3) An adverse event resulting in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing 
hospitalization (for ≥ 24 hours). This does not include hospitalizations that are part 
of routine medical practice. 
4) A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to 
conduct normal life functions. 
5) A congenital anomaly/birth defect. 
6) Important Medical Events (IME) that may not result in death, be life threatening, 
or require hospitalization may be considered a serious adverse drug experience 
when, based upon medical judgment, they may jeopardize the patient or subject 
and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes 
listed in this definition. 
 
11.4 
Specific Examples for Expedited Reporting  
 
11.4.1 SAEs Occurring More than 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug 
Any Serious Adverse Event that occurs more than 30 days after the last 
administration of the investigational agent/intervention and has an attribution of a 
possible, probable, or definite relationship to the study therapy must be reported 
according to the CTEP-AERS reporting tables in this protocol.  
 
11.4.2 Persistent or Significant Disabilities/Incapacities 
Any AE that results in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption 
of the ability to conduct normal life functions (formerly referred to as disabilities), 
congenital anomalies or birth defects, must be reported via CTEP-AERS if it 
occurs at any time following treatment with an agent under a NCI, COG, or 
industry sponsor IND/IDE since these are considered to be serious AEs. 
 
11.4.3 Death 
 
Reportable Categories of Death  
o Death attributable to a CTCAE term.  
o Death Neonatal: A disorder characterized by cessation of life during the first 
28 days of life.  
o Sudden Death NOS: A sudden (defined as instant or within one hour of the 
onset of symptoms) or an unobserved cessation of life that cannot be attributed 
to a CTCAE term associated with Grade 5.  
o Death NOS: A cessation of life that cannot be attributed to a CTCAE term 
associated with grade 5.  
o Death due to progressive disease should be reported as Grade 5 “Disease 
progression” under the system organ class (SOC) of “General disorder and 
administration site conditions”. Evidence that the death was a manifestation of 
underlying disease (e.g., radiological changes suggesting tumor growth or 
progression: clinical deterioration associated with a disease process) should be 
submitted.  
 
Any death occurring within 30 days of the last dose, regardless of attribution to 
the investigational agent/intervention requires expedited reporting within 24 hours.  

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
66 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Any death occurring greater than 30 days after the last dose of the investigational 
agent/intervention requires expedited reporting within 24 hours only if it is 
possibly, probably, or definitely related to the investigational agent/intervention. 
 
11.4.4 Secondary Malignancy 
A secondary malignancy is a cancer caused by treatment for a previous 
malignancy (e.g., treatment with investigational agent/intervention, radiation or 
chemotherapy). A metastasis of the initial neoplasm is not considered a secondary 
malignancy.  
 
All secondary malignancies that occur following treatment need to be reported via 
CTEP-AERS. Three options are available to describe the event:  
• 
Leukemia secondary to oncology chemotherapy  
• 
Myelodysplastic syndrome  
• 
Treatment related secondary malignancy  
Any malignancy possibly related to cancer treatment (including AML/MDS) must 
also be reported via the routine reporting mechanisms outlined in this protocol. 
 
11.4.5 Second Malignancy 
A second malignancy is one unrelated to the treatment of a prior malignancy (and 
is NOT a metastasis from the initial malignancy). Second malignancies require 
ONLY routine reporting via CDUS unless otherwise specified. 
 
11.4.6 Pregnancy, Pregnancy Loss, and Death Neonatal 
NOTE: When submitting CTEP-AERS reports for “Pregnancy”, “Pregnancy loss”, 
or “Neonatal loss”, the Pregnancy Information Form, available at 
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/Pregna
ncyReportForm.pdf, needs to be completed and faxed along with any additional 
medical information to 301-230-0159. The potential risk of exposure of the fetus 
to the investigational agent(s) or chemotherapy agent(s) should be documented in 
the “Description of Event” section of the CTEP-AERS report. 
 
11.4.6.1 Pregnancy 
Patients who become pregnant on study risk intrauterine exposure of the 
fetus to agents that may be teratogenic. For this reason, pregnancy 
occurring on study or within 6 months following the last dose of study 
therapy should be reported in an expedited manner via CTEP-AERS as 
Grade 3 “Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions - Other 
(pregnancy)” under the Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal 
conditions SOC. 
 
Pregnancy needs to be followed until the outcome is known. If the baby 
is born with a birth defect or anomaly, then a second CTEP-AERS report 
is required. 
 
11.4.6.2 Pregnancy Loss (Fetal Death) 
Pregnancy loss is defined in CTCAE as “Death in utero.” 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
67 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Any pregnancy loss should reported expeditiously as Grade 4 
“Pregnancy loss” under the “Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal 
condition” SOC. Do NOT report a pregnancy loss as a Grade 5 event 
since CTEP-AERS recognizes any Grade 5 event as a patient death. 
 
11.4.6.3 Death Neonatal  
Neonatal death, defined in CTCAE as “Newborn deaths occurring 
during the first 28 after birth” that is felt by the investigator to be at 
least possibly due to the investigational agent/intervention, should be 
reported expeditiously.  
 
A neonatal death should be reported expeditiously  as Grade 4 “Death 
neonatal” under the “General disorders and administration” SOC when 
the death is the result of a patient pregnancy or pregnancy in 
partners of men on study.  
 
Do NOT report a neonatal death resulting from a patient pregnancy or 
pregnancy in partners of men on study as a Grade 5 event since CTEP-
AERS recognizes any Grade 5 event as a patient death.  
 
11.5 
Reporting Requirements for Specialized AEs  
 
11.5.1 Baseline AEs 
Although a pertinent positive finding identified on baseline assessment is not an 
AE, when possible it is to be documented as “Course Zero” using CTCAE 
terminology and grade. An expedited AE report is not required if a patient is 
entered on a protocol with a pre-existing condition (e.g., elevated laboratory value, 
diarrhea). The baseline AE must be re-assessed throughout the study and reported 
if it fulfills expedited AE reporting guidelines. 
 
a. If the pre-existing condition worsens in severity, the investigator must 
reassess the event to determine if an expedited report is required. 
b. If the AE resolves and then recurs, the investigator must re-assess the event 
to determine if an expedited report is required. 
c. No modification in grading is to be made to account for abnormalities 
existing at baseline. 
 
11.5.2 Persistent AEs 
A persistent AE is one that extends continuously, without resolution between 
treatment cycles/courses.  
ROUTINE reporting: The AE must be reported only once unless the grade 
becomes more severe in a subsequent course. If the grade becomes more severe 
the AE must be reported again with the new grade. 
EXPEDITED reporting: The AE must be reported only once unless the grade 
becomes more severe in the same or a subsequent course. 
 
11.5.3 Recurrent AEs 
A recurrent AE is one that occurs and resolves during a cycle/course of therapy 
and then reoccurs in a later cycle/course. 
ROUTINE reporting: An AE that resolves and then recurs during a subsequent 
cycle/course must be reported by the routine procedures. 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
68 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
EXPEDITED reporting: An AE that resolves and then recurs during a subsequent 
cycle/course does not require CTEP-AERS reporting unless: 
1) The grade increases OR 
2) Hospitalization is associated with the recurring AE. 
 
11.6 
Exceptions to Expedited Reporting 
 
11.6.1 Special Situations as Exceptions to Expedited Reporting 
An expedited report may not be required for a specific protocol where an AE is 
listed as expected. The exception or acceptable reporting procedures will be 
specified in the protocol. The protocol specific guidelines supersede the NCI 
Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines. These special situations are listed under the 
CTEP-AERS reporting Table A for this protocol. 
 
11.7 
Reporting Requirements - Investigator Responsibility 
Clinical investigators in the treating institutions and ultimately the Study Chair have the 
primary responsibility for AE identification, documentation, grading, and assignment of 
attribution to the investigational agent/intervention. It is the responsibility of the treating 
physician to supply the medical documentation needed to support the expedited AE reports 
in a timely manner.  
 
Note: All expedited AEs (reported via CTEP-AERS) must also be reported via routine 
reporting. Routine reporting is accomplished via the Adverse Event (AE) Case Report 
Form (CRF) within the study database.  
 
11.8 
General Instructions for Expedited Reporting via CTEP-AERS  
 
The reporting methods described below are specific for clinical trials evaluating 
agents for which the IND is held by COG, an investigator, or a pharmaceutical 
company. It is important to note that these procedures differ slightly from those used 
for reporting AEs for clinical trials for which CTEP holds the IND. 
 
The descriptions and grading scales found in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for 
Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 will be utilized for AE reporting and are located on 
the CTEP website at:  
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. All 
appropriate treatment areas should have access to a copy of the CTCAE. 
 
An expedited AE report must be submitted electronically via CTEP-AERS at:  
https://eapps-ctep.nci.nih.gov/ctepaers 
 
• 
Expedited AE reporting timelines are defined as: 
o 24-Hour; 5 Calendar Days - The AE must initially be reported via CTEP-
AERS within 24 hours of learning of the event, followed by a complete 
expedited report within 5 calendar days of the initial 24-hour report. 
o 7 Calendar Days - A complete expedited report on the AE must be submitted 
within 7 calendar days of the investigator learning of the event.  
 
• 
Any event that results in a persistent or significant incapacity/substantial disruption of 
the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is 
an IME, which based upon the medical judgment of the investigator may jeopardize 
the patient and require intervention to prevent a serious AE, must be reported via 
CTEP-AERS if the event occurs following investigational agent administration.  
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
69 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
• 
Any death occurring within 30 days of the last dose, regardless of attribution to an 
agent/intervention requires expedited reporting within 24 hours via e-mail to the COG 
CTEP-AERS Coordinator and Study Chair.  
 
• 
Any death occurring greater than 30 days of the last dose with an attribution of 
possible, probable, or definite to an agent/intervention requires expedited reporting 
within 24 hours via e-mail to the COG CTEP-AERS Coordinator and Study Chair. 
CTEP-AERS Medical Reporting includes the following requirements as part of the report: 
1) whether the patient has received at least one dose of an investigational agent on this 
study; 2) the characteristics of the adverse event including the grade (severity), the 
relationship to the study therapy (attribution), and the prior experience (expectedness) of 
the adverse event; 3) the Phase (1, 2, or 3) of the trial; and 4) whether or not hospitalization 
or prolongation of hospitalization was associated with the event.  
 
Fax or email supporting documentation for AEs related to investigational agents to 
COG: Fax #310-640-9193; email: COGAERS@childrensoncologygroup.org; Attention: 
COG AERS Coordinator.  
 
• 
ALWAYS include the ticket number on all faxed documents. 
 
• 
Use the NCI protocol number and the protocol-specific patient ID provided 
during trial registration on all reports. 
 
Copies of all Adverse Event reports submitted to the FDA should be forwarded 
electronically to CTEPSupportAE@tech-res.com. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
70 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
 
11.9 
Reporting Table for Late Phase 2 and Phase 3 Studies – Table A 
Expedited Reporting Requirements for Adverse Events that Occur on Studies under an 
IND/IDE within 30 Days of the Last Administration of the Investigational 
Agent/Intervention 1 
 
FDA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS (21 CFR 
Part 312)  
NOTE: Investigators MUST immediately report to the sponsor (COG) ANY Serious Adverse 
Events, whether or not they are considered related to the investigational agent(s)/intervention 
(21 CFR 312.64)  
An adverse event is considered serious if it results in ANY of the following outcomes:  
1) Death.  
2) A life-threatening adverse event.  
3) Any AE that results in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for 
 
≥ 24 hours. This does not include hospitalizations that are part of routine medical  practice. 
4) A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal 
 
life functions.  
5) A congenital anomaly/birth defect.  
6) Important Medical Events (IME) that may not result in death, be life threatening, or require 
 
hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon medical judgment, they may 
 
jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one 
 
of the outcomes listed in this definition. (FDA, 21 CFR 312.32; ICH E2A and ICH E6.)  
 
ALL SERIOUS adverse events that meet the above criteria MUST be immediately reported to the 
NCI via CTEP-AERS within the timeframes detailed in the table below.  
 
Hospitalization 
Grade 1 
Timeframes 
Grade 2 
Timeframes 
Grade 3 
Timeframes 
Grade 4 & 5 
Timeframes 
Resulting in 
Hospitalization 
≥ 24 hrs 
 
7 Calendar Days 
 
 
24-Hour Notification 
5 Calendar Days 
Not resulting in 
Hospitalization 
≥ 24 hrs 
 
Not Required 
 
7 Calendar Days 
NOTE: Protocol specific exceptions to expedited reporting of serious adverse events are found in 
the Specific Protocol Exceptions to Expedited Reporting (SPEER) portion of the CAEPR. 
Additional Special Situations as Exceptions to Expedited Reporting are listed below.  
 
Expedited AE reporting timelines are defined as:  
“24-Hour; 5 Calendar Days” – The AE must initially be reported via CTEP-AERS within 24 hours 
of learning of the AE, followed by a complete expedited report within 5 calendar days of the initial 
24-hour notification. 
“7 Calendar Days” – A complete expedited report on the AE must be submitted within 7 calendar 
days of learning of the AE.  
 
1SAEs that occur more than 30 days after the last administration of investigational 
agent/intervention and have an attribution of possible, probable, or definite require reporting as 
follows:  
Expedited 24-hour notification followed by complete report within 5 calendar days for:  
• 
All Grade 4, and Grade 5 AEs  
Expedited 7 calendar day reports for:  
• 
Grade 2 adverse events resulting in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization  
• 
Grade 3 adverse events  
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
71 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
11.10 Protocol Specific Additional Instructions and Reporting Exceptions 
• 
Grades 1-4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) do not 
require expedited reporting.  
• Grades 1-2 AST/ALT elevations do not require expedited reporting. 
 
11.11 Reporting of Adverse Events for commercial agents – CTEP-AERS abbreviated 
pathway 
 
The following are expedited reporting requirements for adverse events experienced by 
patients on study who have not received any doses of an investigational agent on this study. 
Commercial reporting requirements are provided in Table B.  
 
COG requires the CTEP-AERS report to be submitted within 7 calendar days of learning 
of the event. 
 
Table B  
Reporting requirements for adverse events experienced by patients on study who 
have NOT received any doses of an investigational agent on this study. 
 
CTEP-AERS Reporting Requirements for Adverse Events That Occur During 
Therapy With a Commercial Agent or Within 30 Days1 
 
 
Attribution 
Grade 4 
Grade 5 
 
Unexpected 
Expected 
 
Unrelated or Unlikely 
 
 
CTEP-AERS 
Possible, 
Probable, 
Definite 
CTEP-AERS 
 
CTEP-AERS 
1This includes all deaths within 30 days of the last dose of treatment with a commercial 
agent, regardless of attribution.  Any death that occurs more than 30 days after the last 
dose of treatment with a commercial agent that can be attributed (possibly, probably, 
or definitely) to the agent and is not due to cancer recurrence must be reported via 
CTEP-AERS. 
 
 
11.12 Routine Reporting of Adverse Events  
Note: The guidelines below are for routine reporting of study specific adverse events on 
the COG case report forms and do not affect the requirements for CTEP-AERS reporting. 
 
Routine reporting is accomplished via the Adverse Event (AE) Case Report Form (CRF) 
within the study database. For this study, routine reporting will include all CTEP-AERS 
reportable events and Grade 3 and higher Adverse Events. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
72 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
12.0 
STUDY REPORTING AND MONITORING 
 
The Case Report Forms and the submission schedule are posted on the COG website with each 
protocol under “Data Collection/Specimens”. A submission schedule is included. 
 
12.1 
CDUS 
This study will be monitored by the Clinical Data Update System (CDUS). Cumulative 
CDUS data will be submitted quarterly to CTEP by electronic means. Reports are due 
January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31. This is not a responsibility of institutions 
participating in this trial. 
 
12.2 
Data and Safety Monitoring Committee 
To protect the interests of patients and the scientific integrity for all clinical trial research 
by the Children’s Oncology Group, the COG Data and Safety Monitoring Committee 
(DSMC) reviews reports of interim analyses of study toxicity and outcomes prepared by 
the study statistician, in conjunction with the study chair’s report. The DSMC may 
recommend the study be modified or terminated based on these analyses.  
 
Toxicity monitoring is also the responsibility of the study committee and any unexpected 
frequency of serious events on the trial are to be brought to the attention of the DSMC. The 
study statistician is responsible for the monitoring of the interim results and is expected to 
request DSMC review of any protocol issues s/he feels require special review. Any COG 
member may bring specific study concerns to the attention of the DSMC.  
 
The DSMC approves major study modifications proposed by the study committee prior to 
implementation (e.g., termination, dropping an arm based on toxicity results or other trials 
reported, increasing target sample size, etc.). The DSMC determines whether and to whom 
outcome results may be released prior to the release of study results at the time specified 
in the protocol document. 
 
 
12.3 
CRADA/CTA 
NCI/DCTD Standard Language to Be Incorporated into All Protocols Involving 
Agent(s) Covered by a Clinical Trials Agreement (CTA), a Cooperative Research and 
Development Agreement (CRADA) or a Clinical Supply Agreement, hereinafter referred 
to as Collaborative Agreement: 
 
The agent(s) supplied by CTEP, DCTD, NCI used in this protocol is/are provided to the 
NCI under a Collaborative Agreement (CRADA, CTA, CSA) between the Pharmaceutical 
Company(ies) (hereinafter referred to as “Collaborator(s)”) and the NCI Division of Cancer 
Treatment and Diagnosis. Therefore, the following obligations/guidelines, in addition to 
the 
provisions 
in 
the 
“Intellectual 
Property 
Option 
to 
Collaborator” 
(http://ctep.cancer.gov/industryCollaborations2/intellectual_property.htm) 
contained 
within the terms of award, apply to the use of the Agent(s) in this study: 
 
1. Agent(s) may not be used for any purpose outside the scope of this protocol, 
nor can Agent(s) be transferred or licensed to any party not participating in the 
clinical study. Collaborator(s) data for Agent(s) are confidential and 
proprietary to Collaborator(s) and shall be maintained as such by the 
investigators. The protocol documents for studies utilizing Agents contain 
confidential information and should not be shared or distributed without the 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
73 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
permission of the NCI. If a copy of this protocol is requested by a patient or 
patient’s family member participating on the study, the individual should sign 
a confidentiality agreement. A suitable model agreement can be downloaded 
from: http://ctep.cancer.gov. 
 
2. For a clinical protocol where there is an investigational Agent used in 
combination with (an)other Agent(s), each the subject of different 
Collaborative Agreements, the access to and use of data by each Collaborator 
shall be as follows (data pertaining to such combination use shall hereinafter 
be referred to as “Multi-Party Data”): 
 
a. 
NCI will provide all Collaborators with prior written notice regarding the 
existence and nature of any agreements governing their collaboration 
with NCI, the design of the proposed combination protocol, and the 
existence of any obligations that would tend to restrict NCI’s 
participation in the proposed combination protocol. 
 
b. 
Each Collaborator shall agree to permit use of the Multi-Party Data from 
the clinical trial by any other Collaborator solely to the extent necessary 
to allow said other Collaborator to develop, obtain regulatory approval or 
commercialize its own Agent. 
 
c. 
Any Collaborator having the right to use the Multi-Party Data from these 
trials must agree in writing prior to the commencement of the trials that 
it will use the Multi-Party Data solely for development, regulatory 
approval, and commercialization of its own Agent. 
 
3. Clinical Trial Data and Results and Raw Data developed under a Collaborative 
Agreement will be made available to Collaborator(s), the NCI, and the FDA, 
as appropriate and unless additional disclosure is required by law or court order 
as described in the IP Option to Collaborator 
(http://ctep.cancer.gov/industryCollaborations2/intellectual_property.htm). 
Additionally, all Clinical Data and Results and Raw Data will be collected, 
used and disclosed consistent with all applicable federal statutes and 
regulations for the protection of human subjects, including, if applicable, the 
Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information set forth 
in 45 C.F.R. Part 164. 
 
4. When a Collaborator wishes to initiate a data request, the request should first 
be sent to the NCI, who will then notify the appropriate investigators (Group 
Chair for Cooperative Group studies, or PI for other studies) of Collaborator’s 
wish to contact them. 
 
5. Any data provided to Collaborator(s) for Phase 3 studies must be in accordance 
with the guidelines and policies of the responsible Data Monitoring Committee 
(DMC), if there is a DMC for this clinical trial. 
 
6. Any manuscripts reporting the results of this clinical trial must be provided to 
CTEP by the Group office for Cooperative Group studies or by the principal 
investigator for non-Cooperative Group studies for immediate delivery to 
Collaborator(s) for advisory review and comment prior to submission for 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
74 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
publication. Collaborator(s) will have 30 days from the date of receipt for 
review. Collaborator shall have the right to request that publication be delayed 
for up to an additional 30 days in order to ensure that Collaborator’s 
confidential and proprietary data, in addition to Collaborator(s)’s intellectual 
property rights, are protected. Copies of abstracts must be provided to CTEP 
for forwarding to Collaborator(s) for courtesy review as soon as possible and 
preferably at least three (3) days prior to submission, but in any case, prior to 
presentation at the meeting or publication in the proceedings. Press releases 
and other media presentations must also be forwarded to CTEP prior to release. 
Copies of any manuscript, abstract and/or press release/ media presentation 
should be sent to: 
 
Email: ncicteppubs@mail.nih.gov 
 
The Regulatory Affairs Branch will then distribute them to Collaborator(s). 
No publication, manuscript or other form of public disclosure shall contain any 
of Collaborator’s confidential/ proprietary information. 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
75 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
APPENDIX I: YOUTH INFORMATION SHEETS 
 
INFORMATION SHEET REGARDING RESEARCH STUDY ADVL1522 
(for children from 7 through 12 years of age) 
A study of the drug IMGN901 in children 
with a cancer that has come back after treatment or is difficult to treat 
 
1. We have been talking with you about your cancer. You have had treatment for the cancer already 
but the cancer did not go away or it came back after treatment.  
 
2. We are asking you to take part in a research study because other treatments did not get rid of the 
cancer. A research study is when doctors work together to try out new ways to help people who are 
sick. In this study, we are trying to learn more about how to treat the kind of cancer that you have. 
We will do this by trying a new medicine to treat your cancer.  
 
3. Children who are part of this study will be treated with a cancer-fighting medicine called IMGN901. 
You will also have regular tests and exams done more often while you are in this study. The doctors 
want to see if IMGN901 will make children with your type of cancer get better. We don’t know if 
IMGN901 will work well to get rid of your cancer. That is why we are doing this study.  
 
4. Sometimes good things can happen to people when they are in a research study. These good things 
are called “benefits.” We hope that a benefit to you of being part of this study is that IMGN901 
may cause your cancer to stop growing or to shrink for a period of time but we don’t know for sure 
if there is any benefit of being part of this study. 
 
5. Sometimes bad things can happen to people when they are in a research study. These bad things 
are called “risks.” The risks to you from this study are that you may have more problems, or side 
effects, from IMGN901 than other treatments. Other things may happen to you that we don’t yet 
know about. 
 
6. Your family can choose to be part of this study or not. Your family can also decide to stop being 
in this study at any time once you start. There may be other treatments for your illness that your 
doctor can tell you about. Make sure to ask your doctors any questions that you have. 
 
7. As part of your regular care, your doctor may have removed some tissue to see if you have cancer. 
If you take part in this study, we will keep some of the tissue that is left over to do special tests. 
These tests may help us learn more about how IMGN901 works.  
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
76 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
INFORMATION SHEET REGARDING RESEARCH STUDY ADVL1522 
(for teens from 13 through 17 years of age) 
A study of the drug IMGN901 in children 
with a cancer that has come back after treatment or is difficult to treat 
 
1. We have been talking with you about your cancer. You have been diagnosed with one of the following 
types of cancer: Wilms tumor, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Neuroblastoma, Pleuropulmonary blastoma, 
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, or Synovial sarcoma. You have had treatment for the cancer 
already but the cancer did not go away or it came back after treatment.  
 
2. We are asking you to take part in a research study because other treatments did not get rid of the cancer. 
A research study is when doctors work together to try out new ways to help people who are sick. In this 
study, we are trying to learn more about how to treat the kind of cancer that you have. 
 
3. Children and teens who are part of this study will be given a cancer-fighting medicine called IMGN901. 
IMGN901 is a drug made of an antibody attached to an anti-cancer drug. An antibody is a protein used 
by the body’s immune system to fight foreign or diseased cells. The antibody used in IMGN901 attaches 
to cancer cells that have a protein called CD56. Then the anti-cancer drug causes these cancer cells to 
die. We are using IMGN901 in this study because it seems to work against certain types of cancer cells 
in test tubes and animals. IMGN901 is considered experimental because the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) has not approved this drug. The dose of IMGN901 used in this study was found 
to be well-tolerated in adults. 
 
4. You will get IMGN901 by vein on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day period. This entire 21-day period is called 
a cycle. You may continue to receive IMGN901 for up to about 12 months (up to 17 cycles) as long as 
you do not have bad effects from it and your cancer does not get any worse. You will also have exams 
and tests done that are part of normal cancer care. But, the exams and tests will be done more often 
while you are being treated with IMGN901. The doctors want to see if IMGN901 will make children 
with your type of cancer get better. We don’t know if IMGN901 is better than other medicines. That is 
why we are doing this study.  
 
5. Sometimes good things can happen to people when they are in a research study. These good things are 
called “benefits.” We hope that a benefit to you of being part of this study is that IMGN901 may cause 
your cancer to stop growing or to shrink for a period of time but we don’t know for sure if there is any 
benefit of being part of this study. 
 
6. Sometimes bad things can happen to people when they are in a research study. These bad things are 
called “risks.” The risks to you from this study are that you may have more problems, or side effects, 
from IMGN901 than other treatments. Other things may happen to you that we don’t yet know about. 
 
7. Your family can choose to be part of this study or not. Your family can also decide to stop being in this 
study at any time once you start. There may be other treatments for your illness that your doctor can 
tell you about. Make sure to ask your doctors any questions that you have.  
 
8. As part of your regular care, your doctor may have removed some tissue to see if you have cancer. If 
you take part in this study, we will keep some of the tissue that is left over to do special research tests. 
These tests may help us learn more about how IMGN901 works. The samples will come from leftover 
tissue so there would be no extra procedures. 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
77 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
APPENDIX II: Possible Drug Interactions 
 
The lists below do not include everything that may interact with chemotherapy. Study Subjects and/or 
their Parents should be encouraged to talk to their doctors before starting any new medications, using 
over-the-counter medicines, or herbal supplements and before making a significant change in diet. 
 
Dexamethasone 
 
Drugs that may interact with dexamethasone 
• Antibiotics  
o Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, nafcillin, 
rifabutin, rifampin, telithromycin 
• Antidepressants and antipsychotics  
o Aripiprazole, buproprion, citalopram, clozapine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, lurasidone, 
nefazodone, quetiapine 
• Antifungals  
o Caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole 
• Arthritis medications  
o Leflunomide, tofacitinib 
• Anti-rejection medications 
o Cyclosporine, sirolimus, tacrolimus 
• Antiretrovirals and antivirals  
o Atazanavir, boceprevir, darunavir, delaviridine, efavirenz, etravirine, fosamprenavir, 
indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, nevirapine, rilpivirine, ritonavir, saquinavir, Stribild, 
telaprevir, tipranavir 
• Anti-seizure medications  
o Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone 
• Heart medications  
o Amiodarone, amlodipine, dronedenarone, verapamil 
• Some chemotherapy (be sure to talk to your doctor about this) 
• Some oral contraceptives or birth control medications 
• Many other drugs, including the following: 
o Aprepitant, artemether/lumefantine, aspirin, deferasirox, ibuprofen, ivacaftor, lomitapide, 
mifepristone, natalizumab, nimodipine, praziquantel, warfarin 
 
Food and supplements that may interact with dexamethasone* 
• Echinacea 
• St. John’s Wort 
• Grapefruit, grapefruit juice, Seville oranges, star fruit 
*Supplements may come in many forms, such as teas, drinks, juices, liquids, drops, capsules, pills, or 
dried herbs. All forms should be avoided.  
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
78 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
APPENDIX III: CTEP AND CTSU REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
CTEP INVESTIGATOR REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and National Cancer Institute (NCI) policy 
require all investigators participating in any NCI-sponsored clinical trial to register and to renew 
their registration annually. 
 
Registration requires the submission of: 
 
• 
a completed Statement of Investigator Form (FDA Form 1572) with an original signature 
• 
a current Curriculum Vitae (CV) 
• 
a completed and signed Supplemental Investigator Data Form (IDF) 
• 
a completed Financial Disclosure Form (FDF) with an original signature 
 
Fillable PDF forms and additional information can be found on the CTEP website at 
<http://ctep.cancer.gov/investigatorResources/investigator_registration.htm>. For questions, please 
contact 
the 
CTEP 
Investigator 
Registration 
Help 
Desk 
by 
email 
at 
<pmbregpend@ctep.nci.nih.gov>. 
 
CTEP Associate Registration Procedures / CTEP-IAM Account 
 
The Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) Identity and Access Management (IAM) 
application is a web-based application intended for use by both Investigators (i.e., all physicians 
involved in the conduct of NCI-sponsored clinical trials) and Associates (i.e., all staff involved in 
the conduct of NCI-sponsored clinical trials). 
 
Associates will use the CTEP-IAM application to register (both initial registration and annual re-
registration) with CTEP and to obtain a user account. 
 
Investigators will use the CTEP-IAM application to obtain a user account only. (See CTEP 
Investigator Registration Procedures above for information on registering with CTEP as an 
Investigator, which must be completed before a CTEP-IAM account can be requested.) 
 
An active CTEP-IAM user account will be needed to access all CTEP and CTSU (Cancer Trials 
Support Unit) websites and applications, including the CTSU members’ website. 
 
Additional 
information 
can 
be 
found 
on 
the 
CTEP 
website 
at 
<http://ctep.cancer.gov/branches/pmb/associate_registration.htm>. For questions, please contact 
the CTEP Associate Registration Help Desk by email at <ctepreghelp@ctep.nci.nih.gov>. 
 
CTSU REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
 
This study is supported by the NCI Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU).  
 
Requirements for ADVL1522 Site Registration: 
 
• 
CTSU IRB Certification (for sites not participating via the CIRB) 
• 
CTSU IRB/Regulatory Approval Transmittal Sheet (for sites not participating via the NCI 
CIRB)  
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
79 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
Submitting Regulatory Documents: 
 
Submit completed forms along with a copy of your IRB Approval to the CTSU Regulatory Office, 
where they will be entered and tracked in the CTSU RSS.  
CTSU Regulatory Office 
1818 Market Street, Suite 1100 
Philadelphia, PA 19103 
Phone: 1-866-651-2878 
Fax: 
215-569-0206 
E-mail: CTSURegulatory@ctsu.coccg.org (for regulatory document submission only) 
 
Checking Your Site’s Registration Status: 
 
Check the status of your site’s registration packets by querying the RSS site registration status page 
of the members’ section of the CTSU website. (Note: Sites will not receive formal notification of 
regulatory approval from the CTSU Regulatory Office.) 
 Go to https://www.ctsu.org and log in to the members’ area using your CTEP-IAM username 
and password 
 Click on the Regulatory tab at the top of your screen 
 Click on the Site Registration tab 
 Enter your 5-character CTEP Institution Code and click on Go 
 
 
 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
80 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
 
REFERENCES 
 
1. 
Pode-Shakked N, Shukrun R, Mark-Danieli M, et al: The isolation and characterization of renal 
cancer initiating cells from human Wilms' tumour xenografts unveils new therapeutic targets. EMBO 
Mol Med 5:18-37, 2013 
2. 
Pode-Shakked N, Metsuyanim S, Rom-Gross E, et al: Developmental tumourigenesis: NCAM as a 
putative marker for the malignant renal stem/progenitor cell population. J Cell Mol Med 13:1792-
808, 2009 
3. 
Wood AC, Maris JM, Gorlick R, et al: Initial testing (Stage 1) of the antibody-maytansinoid 
conjugate, IMGN901 (Lorvotuzumab mertansine), by the pediatric preclinical testing program. 
Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:1860-7, 2013 
4. 
Muir TE, Cheville JC, Lager DJ: Metanephric adenoma, nephrogenic rests, and Wilms' tumor: a 
histologic and immunophenotypic comparison. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1290-6, 2001 
5. 
Kapur P, Rakheja D: Immunohistochemical expression of neural cell adhesion molecule in Wilms 
tumors, nephrogenic rests, and fetal and postnatal renal cortices. Pediatr Dev Pathol 14:16-9, 2011 
6. 
Gluer S, Schelp C, von Schweinitz D, et al: Polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule in childhood 
rhabdomyosarcoma. Pediatr Res 43:145-7, 1998 
7. 
Molenaar WM, Muntinghe FL: Expression of neural cell adhesion molecules and neurofilament 
protein isoforms in skeletal muscle tumors. Hum Pathol 29:1290-3, 1998 
8. 
Gluer S, Schelp C, Gerardy-Schahn R, et al: Polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule as a marker 
for differential diagnosis in pediatric tumors. J Pediatr Surg 33:1516-20, 1998 
9. 
Winter C, Pawel B, Seiser E, et al: Neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) isoform expression is 
associated with neuroblastoma differentiation status. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:10-6, 2008 
10. 
Wachowiak R, Rawnaq T, Metzger R, et al: Universal expression of cell adhesion molecule NCAM 
in neuroblastoma in contrast to L1: implications for different roles in tumor biology of 
neuroblastoma? Pediatr Surg Int 24:1361-4, 2008 
11. 
Korja M, Jokilammi A, Salmi TT, et al: Absence of polysialylated NCAM is an unfavorable 
prognostic phenotype for advanced stage neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer 9:57, 2009 
12. 
Klehr M, Koehl U, Muhlenhoff M, et al: The novel chimeric anti-NCAM (neural cell adhesion 
molecule) antibody ch.MK1 displays antitumor activity in SCID mice but does not activate 
complement-dependent cytolysis (CDC). J Immunother 32:442-51, 2009 
13. 
Folpe AL, Schmidt RA, Chapman D, et al: Poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma: 
immunohistochemical distinction from primitive neuroectodermal tumors and high-grade malignant 
peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 22:673-82, 1998 
14. 
Mechtersheimer G, Staudter M, Moller P: Expression of the natural killer cell-associated antigens 
CD56 and CD57 in human neural and striated muscle cells and in their tumors. Cancer Res 51:1300-
7, 1991 
15. 
Olsen SH, Thomas DG, Lucas DR: Cluster analysis of immunohistochemical profiles in synovial 
sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, and Ewing sarcoma. Mod Pathol 19:659-68, 2006 
16. 
Sadikovic B, Graham C, Ho M, et al: Immunohistochemical expression and cluster analysis of 
mesenchymal and neural stem cell-associated proteins in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. Pediatr Dev 
Pathol 14:259-72, 2011 
17. 
IMGN901 Investigator Brochure Version 13. May 28, 2014 
18. 
Whiteman KR, Ab O, Bartle LM, et al: Efficacy of IMGN901 (huN901-DM1) in combination with 
bortezomib and lenalidomide against multiple myeloma cells in preclinical studies. Proc Am Assoc 
Cancer Res. 49 abstr:2146, 2008 
19. 
Whiteman KR, Johnson HA, Xu S, et al: Lorvotuzumab mertansine (IMGN901) in combination with 
standard-of-care paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy is highly active in a preclinical xenograft model of 
ovarian cancer. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 52 abstr:1781, 2011 

                              THIS PROTOCOL IS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, SEE PAGE 1 FOR USAGE POLICY            
ADVL1522 
81 
Version Date: 07/09/18 
20. 
Whiteman KR, Johnson H, Xu S, et al: Combination therapy with IMGN901 and lenalidomide plus 
low-dose dexamethasone is highly effective in multiple myeloma xenograft models. Proc Am Assoc 
Cancer Res. 50 abstr:2799, 2009 
21. 
Sebire NJ, Gibson S, Rampling D, et al: Immunohistochemical findings in embryonal small round 
cell tumors with molecular diagnostic confirmation. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 13:1-5, 
2005 
22. 
Berdeja JG: Lorvotuzumab mertansine: antibody-drug-conjugate for CD56+ multiple myeloma. 
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 19:163-70, 2014 
23. 
Woll P, Fossella FV, O'Brien MO, et al: Phase I study of IMGN901 (BB-10901) in patients with 
CD56-positive solid tumors. Eur J Cancer 6(Suppl) abstr:510, 2008 
24. 
Woll PJ, O'Brien M, Fossella F, et al: Phase I study of lorvotuzumab mertansine (IMGN901) in 
patients with CD56-positive solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 21(Suppl. 8) abstr:536P, 2010 
25. 
Chanan-Khan A, Wolf J, Garcia J, et al: Efficacy analysis from a phase I study of lorvotuzumab 
mertansine (IMGN901) used as monotherapy in patients with heavily pre-treated CD56-positive 
multiple myeloma. Blood. 116:819. Abstr 1962, 2010 
26. 
Tolcher AW FB, McCreery H, Hammond L, Patnaik A, Lambert J, Xie H, Hoffee M, Zentgraf R, 
Zinner R, Glisson B, Clinch Y, Barrington P, Rowinsky E, Fossella F. A phase I and pharmacokinetic 
study of BB-10901, a maytansinoid immunoconjugate, in CD56 expressing tumors. Eur J Cancer. 
2002;38(Suppl. 7):S152–153. Abstr 509.: A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of BB-10901, a 
maytansinoid immunoconjugate, in CD56 expressing tumors. Eur J Cancer. 38(Suppl. 7):S152–153. 
Abstr 509, 2002 
27. 
McCann J, Fossella FV, Villalona-Calero MA, et al: Phase II trial of huN901-DM1 in patients with 
relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and CD56-positive small cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 
25(18S):Abstr 18084, 2007 
28. 
Fossella F, Woll PJ, Lorigan P, et al: Clinical experience of IMGN901 (BB-10901) in patients with 
small cell lung carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol [13th World Conference on Lung Cancer, 2009] 4(Suppl. 
9):Abstr 6327. (PD4.3.5), 2009 
29. 
Berdeja JG, Ailawadhi S, Weitman SD, et al: Phase I study of lorvotuzumab mertansine (LM, 
IMGN901) in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (Dex) in patients with CD56-
positive relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). J Clin Oncol. 29(Suppl):abstr 8013, 
2011 
30. 
Berdeja JG, Ailawadhi MD, Niesvizky R, et al: Phase I study of lorvotuzumab mertansine 
(IMGN901) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with CD56-positive 
relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma – a preliminary safety and efficacy analysis of the 
combination. Blood. 116:abstr 1934, 2010 
31. 
Spigel DR, Bendell J, Mita AC, et al: Phase I/II study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) 
and efficacy of lorvotuzumab mertansine (LM, IMGN901) in combination with carboplatin/etoposide 
in patients with solid tumors including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). 37th ESMO Congress, Vienna. 
Ann Oncol. 23(Suppl. 9):Abstr 1543TiP, 2012 
32. 
Thall PF, Simon RM, Estey EH: Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials 
with multiple outcomes. Stat Med 14:357-79, 1995 
33. 
Thall PF, Simon RM, Estey EH: New statistical strategy for monitoring safety and efficacy in single-
arm clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 14:296-303, 1996 
34. 
Eisenhauer EA TP, Bogaerts J, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised 
RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer:228-47, 2009