Phase II Study of Consolidation Immunotherapy With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): BTCRC-LUN16-081
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Sponsor: Greg Durm, MD

  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
 
Phase II Study of Consolidation Immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or 
Nivolumab alone following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for  
Unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) 
Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium: BTCRC-LUN16-081 
 
Sponsor Investigator 
Greg Durm, MD 
Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine 
Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center 
 
Co-Investigators
Lawrence H Einhorn, MD 
Shadia Jalal, MD 
Nasser Hanna, MD 
Timothy L. Ratliff, PhD 
Uma K. Aryal, PhD 
Yunlong Liu, PhD 
Tim Lautenschlaeger, MD 
Homer Twigg, MD 
Hong Du, PhD 
Cong Yan, PhD 
Christina Ferreira, PhD 
Tiago Sobreira, PhD 
 
Statistician 
Susan Perkins, PhD 
 
Bioinformatics 
Jun Wan, PhD 
 
Trial Management Provided by  
BTCRC Administrative Headquarters at Hoosier Cancer Research Network, Inc. 
500 N. Meridian, Suite 100 
Indianapolis, IN 46204 
 
Trial Supported by  
Bristol-Myers Squibb (CA209-9H8) 
 
Investigational New Drug (IND) Number: 
136390 
 
 
Initial Protocol Version Date: 27JUN2017 
 
Protocol Amendment Version Date:  
04DEC2018 
28FEB2020 (current) 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 2 of 80 
PROTOCOL SIGNATURE PAGE 
 
Protocol title: 
Phase II Study of Consolidation Immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Nivolumab alone 
following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 
(NSCLC) 
 
VERSION DATE:  28FEB2020 
I confirm I have read this protocol, I understand it, and I will work according to this protocol and to the 
ethical principles stated in the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the applicable guidelines for 
good clinical practices, whichever provides the greater protection of the individual.  I will accept the 
monitor’s overseeing of the study.  I will promptly submit the protocol to applicable ethical review 
board(s). 
 
 
 
 
____________________________________ 
________________________ 
 Signature of Site Investigator 
 
 
  
 Date 
 
 
____________________________________ 
 Site Investigator Name (printed) 
 
 
____________________________________ 
 Site Investigator Title 
 
 
____________________________________ 
 Name of Facility 
 
 
____________________________________ 
 Location of Facility (City and State) 
 
 
 
PLEASE EMAIL COMPLETED FORM TO BTCRC ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 3 of 80 
SYNOPSIS 
TITLE 
Phase II Study of Consolidation Immunotherapy with Nivolumab and 
Ipilimumab or Nivolumab alone following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for 
Unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
PHASE 
Phase II 
OBJECTIVES 
Primary Objective: 
Arm 1- To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab alone 
following concurrent chemoradiation improves 18-month progression free 
survival (PFS) relative to a historical control of chemoradiation alone, in 
subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC 
Arm 2- To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab and 
ipilimumab following concurrent chemoradiation improves 18-month PFS 
relative to a historical control of chemoradiation followed by single agent 
checkpoint inhibitor, in subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or 
IIIB NSCLC 
Secondary Objectives: 
 To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab alone following 
concurrent chemoradiation improves time to metastatic disease and overall 
survival (OS) relative to a historical control of chemoradiation alone in 
subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC (Arm 
1). 
 To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab 
following concurrent chemoradiation improves time to metastatic disease 
and overall survival (OS) relative to a historical control of chemoradiation 
followed by single agent checkpoint inhibitor in subjects with inoperable 
or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC (Arm 2).   
 To assess toxicity and tolerability of consolidation therapy with 
nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone following concurrent 
chemoradiation in subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or 
IIIB NSCLC. 
Exploratory Objectives: 
 To assess PD-L1, CD4, CD8, expression levels in the tumor samples of 
subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC and 
correlate with PFS, OS, time to metastatic disease, and treatment toxicity.  
 To assess associations between DNA, RNA, microRNA, DNA 
methylation, protein expression, lipidomic profiling, immune markers, 
protein biomarker panels, and other markers and efficacy and toxicity of 
treatment.   
 To explore whether clinical characteristics may be associated with the 
development of pneumonitis and correlate with PFS, OS, time to 
metastatic disease, and treatment toxicity. 
 To explore whether radiation treatment plan deviation or lung dosimetric 
factors may be associated with the development of pneumonitis and 
correlate with PFS, OS, time to metastatic disease, and treatment toxicity.

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 4 of 80 
 To examine characteristics of BAL samples (e.g cytokines and 
chemokines) in patients who develop pneumonitis. 
STUDY DESIGN 
This is an open label, multi-institutional, randomized, non-comparative two-
arm phase II trial of consolidation therapy with either nivolumab plus 
ipilimumab or nivolumab alone following initial treatment with concurrent 
chemoradiation in subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB 
NSCLC.  Subjects will be randomized 1:1 following chemoradiation and prior 
to initiation of consolidation therapy.
KEY 
ELIGIBILITY 
CRITERIA  
Inclusion Criteria: 
1. Written informed consent and HIPAA authorization for release of personal 
health information.  
2. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent. 
3. Histological or cytological evidence of NSCLC.  
4. Must have unresectable or inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB disease according 
to the 7th edition IASLC stage classification for lung cancer. Subjects are 
considered unresectable or inoperable based on the judgment of the 
treating physician.  
5. Subjects must have completed concurrent chemoradiation with a platinum 
doublet and a dose of radiation ranging from 59.4-66.6 Gy.  Subjects must 
have stable disease or disease response as evidenced on CT or PET scan 
evaluation. For those eligible, nivolumab or nivolumab/ipilimumab should 
begin within 56 days following the completion of chemoradiation.  
OR 
Subjects must have completed up to 2 cycles of consolidation therapy 
started within 8 weeks of completion of radiation.  After completion of 
consolidation therapy, subjects must have stable disease or disease 
response as evidenced by CT or PET scan evaluation.  For those eligible, 
nivolumab or nivolumab/ipilimumab should begin within 56 days after the 
last cycle of chemotherapy. 
6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 
1 within 14 days prior to registration for protocol therapy. 
7. Adequate laboratory values obtained within 14 days prior to registration 
for protocol therapy (see protocol for details) 
8. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or 
urine pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of 
HCG) within 7 days prior to registration. NOTE: Women are considered 
of childbearing potential unless they are surgically sterile (have undergone 
a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or are 
post-menopausal. Menopause is defined clinically as 12 months of 
amenorrhea in a woman over age 45 in the absence of other biological or 
physiological causes. In addition, women under the age of 62 must have a 
documented serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level greater than 
40 mIU/mL to be considered post-menopausal. 
9. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to abstain from 
heterosexual activity or use an effective method of contraception from the 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 5 of 80 
time of informed consent until 23 weeks after treatment discontinuation. 
See Section 5.5.2 for adequate methods of contraception.  
10. Men who are sexually active with WOCBP must use any contraceptive 
method with a failure rate of less than 1% per year. Men receiving study 
drug and who are sexually active with WOCBP will be instructed to adhere 
to contraception for a period of 31 weeks after the last dose of 
investigational product. See section 5.5.2 for methods of contraception. 
Exclusion Criteria: 
1. Pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children 
within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the pre-screening or 
screening visit through 23 weeks (female) or 31 weeks (male) after the last 
dose of trial treatment. 
2. Active central nervous system (CNS) metastases. If symptomatic or 
without prior brain imaging, subjects must undergo a head computed 
tomography (CT) scan or brain MRI within 28 days prior to registration for 
protocol therapy to exclude brain metastases.  
3. Treatment with any investigational agent within 28 days prior to 
registration for protocol therapy 
4. Prior chemotherapy, adjuvant therapy, or radiotherapy for lung cancer 
other than standard concurrent chemoradiation or up to 2 cycles of 
consolidation as described above 
5. Prior therapy with a PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 or CTLA-4 inhibitor or a lung 
cancer-specific vaccine therapy 
6. Previously received a solid organ transplant or allogeneic progenitor/stem 
cell transplant. 
7. Presence of metastatic disease (stage IV NSCLC) is not allowed. Subjects 
must be evaluated with a CT or PET scan prior to registration for protocol 
therapy to exclude metastatic disease. 
8. Active second cancers. 
9. Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment within the past 90 
days or a documented history of clinically severe autoimmune disease, or a 
syndrome that requires systemic steroids or immunosuppressive agents. 
Subjects with vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy would be an 
exception to this rule. Subjects that require intermittent use of 
bronchodilators or local steroid injections would not be excluded from the 
study. Subjects with hypothyroidism stable on hormone replacement or 
Sjogren’s syndrome will not be excluded from the study 
10. Presence of interstitial lung disease or history of pneumonitis requiring 
treatment with corticosteroids 
11. Diagnosis of immunodeficiency or receiving chronic systemic 
corticosteroid therapy or other immunosuppressive therapy (excludes 
inhaled corticosteroids) within 7 days of first dose of study drug 
12. History of psychiatric illness or social situations that would limit 
compliance with study requirements. 
13. Clinically significant acute infection requiring systemic antibacterial, 
antifungal, or antiviral therapy including: tuberculosis, hepatitis B, 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 6 of 80 
hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (see protocol for 
exceptions).  
14. History or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory 
abnormality that might confound the results of the trial, interfere with the 
subject’s participation for the full duration of the trial, or is not in the best 
interest of the subject to participate, in the opinion of the site investigator. 
15. Has a known history of active TB (Bacillus Tuberculosis). 
16. Hypersensitivity to nivolumab, ipilimumab, or any of their excipients. 
17. Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to planned start of study 
therapy.  
NOTE:  Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally inactivated 
flu vaccines and are allowed; however intranasal influenza vaccines (e.g., 
Flu-Mist®) are live attenuated vaccines, and are not allowed.
STATISTICAL 
CONSIDERATIONS 
This is a non-comparative two-arm trial with each arm being analyzed 
separately.  For Arm 1, when the sample size is 51, a non-parametric test 
(single-group and based on a non-parametric estimate of the cumulative hazard 
function) with a one-sided 0.10 significance level will have 80% power to 
detect an 18 month PFS rate of 44% relative to a historical control rate of 30%  
(similar to the PACIFIC trial) assuming an accrual period of approximately 24 
months and maximum follow-up of 48 months (i.e. would allow for up to 24 
months of follow-up after accrual ends).  For Arm 2,  when the sample size is 
48, a non-parametric test (as above) with a one-sided 0.10 significance level 
will have 80% power to detect an 18 month PFS of 59% relative to a historical 
control rate of 44%  (similar to the PACIFIC trial in the checkpoint inhibitor 
arm and a 15% increase in absolute magnitude) assuming an accrual period of 
approximately 24 months and maximum follow-up of 48 months. To account 
for non-evaluable subjects (5%), 54 subjects will be enrolled in Arm 1 and 51 
subjects in Arm 2.  Time to metastatic disease and Overall survival will be 
estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and medians described with 95% 
confidence intervals. 18 month PFS will also be described with 80% 
confidence intervals. Toxicity and tolerability will be tabulated.  Tumor and 
blood biomarkers will be correlated with clinical outcomes using logistic and 
Cox regression methods.
TOTAL  
NUMBER OF 
SUBJECTS 
N = 105 (54 subjects in Arm 1 and 51 in Arm 2) 
ESTIMATED 
ENROLLMENT 
PERIOD 
24 months 
ESTIMATED 
STUDY 
DURATION  
48 months 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 7 of 80 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
Schema ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 
1. 
Background and Rationale ................................................................................................................ 10 
1.1 
Lung Cancer Background ......................................................................................................... 10 
1.2 
Current Standard of Care .......................................................................................................... 10 
1.3 
Investigational Treatment ......................................................................................................... 10 
1.4 
Rationale for Study ................................................................................................................... 16 
2. 
Study Objectives and Endpoints ....................................................................................................... 18 
2.1 
Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 18 
2.2 
Endpoints .................................................................................................................................. 19 
3. 
Eligibility Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 19 
3.1 
Inclusion Criteria ...................................................................................................................... 19 
3.2 
Exclusion Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 21 
4. 
Subject Registration .......................................................................................................................... 22 
5. 
Treatment Plan .................................................................................................................................. 22 
5.1 
Randomization and Stratification ............................................................................................. 22 
5.2 
Study Drug Administration and Treatment Schedule ............................................................... 23 
5.3 
Concomitant Medications ......................................................................................................... 24 
5.4 
Supportive Care ........................................................................................................................ 25 
5.5 
Diet/Activity/Other Considerations .......................................................................................... 27 
6. 
Toxicities and Dose Delays/Dose Modifications .............................................................................. 29 
6.1 
Dose Delays/Dose Modifications ............................................................................................. 29 
6.2 
Subject Withdrawal/Discontinuation Criteria ........................................................................... 32 
6.3 
Protocol Discontinuation .......................................................................................................... 33 
7. 
Arm 1 (Nivolumab): Study Calendar & Evaluations ........................................................................ 34 
8. 
Arm 2 (Nivolumab + Ipilimumab): Study Calendar & Evaluations ................................................. 36 
8.1 
Screening Evaluations ............................................................................................................... 38 
8.2 
On Treatment Evaluations ........................................................................................................ 39 
8.3 
Imaging while on treatment ...................................................................................................... 40 
8.4 
Safety Follow-up Evaluations ................................................................................................... 40 
8.5 
Long Term Follow-up Evaluations ........................................................................................... 40 
9. 
Biospecimen Studies and Procedures ............................................................................................... 41 
9.1 
Mandatory Unstained Slides for Analysis1 ............................................................................... 41 
9.2 
Mandatory Whole Blood Collection for Somatic Baseline ...................................................... 42 
9.3 
Mandatory Serum Collection for Proteomic Profiling, Cytokine Analyses, and Signature 
Protein Analyses ................................................................................................................................... 42 
9.4 
Mandatory Plasma Collection for microRNA Analyses ........................................................... 44 
9.5 
Mandatory Whole Blood Collection for Flow Cytometry ........................................................ 44 
9.6 
Optional Bronchoalveolar Lavage ............................................................................................ 44 
9.7 
Storage of Biospecimens........................................................................................................... 45 
9.8 
Optional Banking Samples for future studies ........................................................................... 45 
9.9 
Confidentiality of Biospecimens ............................................................................................... 45 
10. 
Criteria for Disease Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 45 
10.1 
Measurable Disease .................................................................................................................. 45 
10.2 
Non-measurable Lesions ........................................................................................................... 46 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 8 of 80 
10.3 
Target Lesions ........................................................................................................................... 46 
10.4 
Non-target Lesions .................................................................................................................... 46 
10.5 
Evaluation of Target Lesions .................................................................................................... 46 
10.6 
Evaluation of Non-target Lesions ............................................................................................. 47 
10.7 
Evaluation of Best Overall Response ....................................................................................... 47 
10.8 
Definitions for Response Evaluation – RECIST 1.1 ................................................................ 48 
11. 
Drug Information .......................................................................................................................... 49 
11.1 
Nivolumab (Opdivo®) .............................................................................................................. 49 
11.2 
Ipilimumab (Yervoy™) .............................................................................................................. 54 
12. 
Adverse Events ............................................................................................................................. 57 
12.1 
Definitions................................................................................................................................. 57 
12.2 
Reporting................................................................................................................................... 59 
13. 
Statistical Methods ........................................................................................................................ 60 
13.1 
Study Design ............................................................................................................................. 61 
13.2 
Endpoints .................................................................................................................................. 61 
13.3 
Sample Size and Accrual .......................................................................................................... 61 
13.4 
Analysis Datasets ...................................................................................................................... 61 
13.5 
Assessment of Safety ................................................................................................................ 62 
13.6 
Assessment of Efficacy ............................................................................................................. 62 
13.7 
Data Analysis Plans .................................................................................................................. 62 
13.8 
Interim Analysis/Criteria for Stopping Study ........................................................................... 64 
14. 
Trial Management ......................................................................................................................... 65 
14.1 
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP) ............................................................................... 65 
14.2 
Data Safety Monitoring Board .................................................................................................. 65 
14.3 
Data Quality Oversight Activities ............................................................................................. 65 
14.4 
Compliance with Trial Registration and Results Posting Requirements .................................. 66 
15. 
Data Handling and Record Keeping ............................................................................................. 66 
15.1 
Data Management ..................................................................................................................... 66 
15.2 
Case Report Forms and Submission ......................................................................................... 66 
15.3 
Record Retention ...................................................................................................................... 67 
15.4 
Confidentiality .......................................................................................................................... 67 
16. 
Ethics............................................................................................................................................. 67 
16.1 
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval ............................................................................. 67 
16.2 
Ethical Conduct of the Study .................................................................................................... 67 
16.3 
Informed Consent Process ........................................................................................................ 67 
17. 
References ..................................................................................................................................... 69 
18. 
APPENDIX 1: Adverse Event Management Algorithms ............................................................. 72 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
 Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 9 of 80 
SCHEMA 
 
Stable Disease or Response (PR, CR) 
Concurrent Chemoradiation 
Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy 
 
PLUS 
 
Radiation (Dose 59.4-66.6 Gy)
Progressive Disease 
Subjects that have completed chemotherapy/radiation will have radiology 
scans within 56 days of completing treatment  
OR 
Subjects that have completed up to 2 cycles of consolidation therapy will 
have radiology scans within 56 days of completing treatment 
Completion of eligibility 
requirements and study registration
Not Eligible 
Arm 1 
Nivolumab 
480mg IV every 
4 weeks for up 
to 6 cycles 
Arm 2 
Nivolumab 240mg IV every 2 weeks 
PLUS 
Ipilimumab 1mg/kg IV every 6 weeks 
for up to 4 cycles (12 doses Nivolumab and 4 doses of Ipilimumab)
Subjects that have completed chemotherapy and radiation will begin immunotherapy within 56 days of completing 
treatment OR Subjects that have completed up to 2 cycles of consolidation therapy will begin immunotherapy within 56 
days of completing of treatment 
Randomization 1:1 
Subjects will be stratified by:  

stage (IIIA vs. IIIB) and  

histology (SqCC vs. non-SqCC vs. NOS) 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 10 of 80 
1. 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE 
Refer to the Investigator’s Brochure (IB)/approved labeling for detailed background information on 
nivolumab and ipilimumab.  
1.1 
Lung Cancer Background 
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and in the world with 
an estimated 224,390 new cases and 158,080 deaths in the U.S. in 2016 (1).  This accounts for 
approximately 26.5% of all cancer deaths, more than breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer combined (1, 
2).  Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents about 85% of all primary lung malignancies.  
Outcomes for this disease are poor, with the five-year overall survival (OS) rate for NSCLC being only 
17.7% (2). While improvements have been made including molecularly targeted drugs and 
immunotherapy, new approaches are clearly needed to improve outcomes in this disease. 
1.2 
Current Standard of Care 
One particular area with a specific need for new therapeutic options is stage III NSCLC, especially for 
patients with unresectable or inoperable tumors.  The five-year OS for patients with stage IIIA and IIIB 
NSCLC are 14% and 5% respectively (3).  Previous efforts to improve outcomes in this population have 
not changed the landscape of treatment significantly in the last few decades.  Until the 1980s, 
radiotherapy alone was the standard of care for patients with locally or regionally advanced NSCLC.  
Five-year survival rates for radiotherapy alone were only 3-10% (4).  Because of these poor outcomes, 
trials looking at sequential chemoradiation were completed showing an advantage in OS for the addition 
of chemotherapy (4, 5).  Following this, sequential chemoradiation was compared to concurrent 
chemoradiation showing a subsequent improvement in OS for concurrent therapy (6, 7).  This finding 
was confirmed in a meta-analysis showing an absolute benefit of 4.5% at five years favoring concurrent 
chemoradiation over sequential (8). Since that time, a number of subsequent trials evaluating induction 
(9, 10) and consolidation (10-14) chemotherapy have failed to demonstrate an improvement in OS in 
this population.  Recently, a trial was completed which gave patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC 
concurrent chemoradiation followed by either 12 months of consolidation Durvalumab (PD-L1 
inhibitor) or placebo.  This trial showed an improved median PFS of 17.2 months with durvalumab vs. 
5.6 months with placebo (HR 0.51).  Overall survival also favored the Durvalumab arm with a 24-month 
OS of 66.3% vs. 55.6% in the placebo arm (HR 0.68, p=0.0025) (15).  Based on this data, consolidation 
Durvalumab should be considered a potential new standard of care following chemoradiation for 
patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.    
1.3 
Investigational Treatment 
1.3.1 Nivolumab 
1.3.1.1 Introduction 
Nivolumab (also referred to as BMS-936558 or MDX1106) is a human monoclonal antibody (HuMAb; 
immunoglobulin G4 [IgG4]-S228P) that targets the programmed death-1 (PD-1) cluster of 
differentiation 279 (CD279) cell surface membrane receptor. PD-1 is a negative regulatory molecule 
expressed by activated T and B lymphocytes (16).  Binding of PD-1 to its ligands, programmed death–
ligands 1 (PD-L1) and 2 (PD-L2), results in the down-regulation of lymphocyte activation. Inhibition of 
the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands promotes immune responses and antigen-specific T-cell 
responses to both foreign antigens as well as self-antigens. Nivolumab is expressed in Chinese hamster 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 11 of 80 
ovary (CHO) cells and is produced using standard mammalian cell cultivation and chromatographic 
purification technologies. The clinical study product is a sterile solution for parenteral administration. 
OPDIVO™ (nivolumab) is approved for use in multiple countries including the United States (US, Dec-
2014), the European Union (EU, Jun-2015), and Japan (Jul-2014). (17). 
 
1.3.1.2 Non-clinical Studies 
Nivolumab has been shown to bind specifically to the human PD-1 receptor and not to related members 
of the CD28 family (17). Nivolumab inhibits the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, 
resulting in enhanced T-cell proliferation and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release in vitro (17, 18). 
Nivolumab binds with high affinity to activated human T-cells expressing cell surface PD-1 and to 
cynomolgus monkey PD-1 (17). In a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), nivolumab promoted a 
reproducible concentration-dependent enhancement of IFN-γ release (19). 
1.3.1.3 Effects in Humans 
Nivolumab has demonstrated durable responses exceeding 6 months as monotherapy and in combination 
with ipilimumab in several tumor types, including NSCLC, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 
classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), gastric cancer, urothelial cancer, 
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and colorectal cancer (CRC). In confirmatory trials, nivolumab as 
monotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS as compared with the current 
standard of care in subjects with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, unresectable or metastatic melanoma, 
advanced RCC, or squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Nivolumab in combination 
with ipilimumab improved PFS and ORR over ipilimumab alone in subjects with unresectable or 
metastatic melanoma (see Section 5.4 of IB) (17). 
 
The overall safety experience with nivolumab, as a monotherapy or in combination with other 
therapeutics, is based on experience in approximately 16,900 subjects treated to date. For monotherapy, 
the safety profile is similar across tumor types. There is no pattern in the incidence, severity, or causality 
of AEs to nivolumab dose level. In Phase 3 controlled studies, the safety profile of nivolumab 
monotherapy is acceptable in the context of the observed clinical efficacy, and manageable using 
established safety guidelines. Clinically relevant AEs typical of stimulation of the immune system were 
infrequent and manageable by delaying or stopping nivolumab treatment and timely immunosuppressive 
therapy or other supportive care.  
 
Based on preliminary data from an ongoing Phase 1 study, there have been no unexpected safety 
findings to date in patients with sepsis who received a single dose of nivolumab monotherapy. 
 
In several ongoing clinical trials, the safety of nivolumab in combination with other therapeutics such as 
ipilimumab, cytotoxic chemotherapy, anti-angiogenics, and targeted therapies is being explored. Most 
studies are ongoing and, as such, the safety profile of nivolumab combinations continues to evolve. The 
most advanced combination under development is nivolumab + ipilimumab, which is approved in 
subjects with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (see Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 of IB), and being 
studied in multiple tumor types. Results to date suggest that the safety profile of nivolumab+ipilimumab 
combination therapy is consistent with the mechanisms of action of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The 
nature of the AEs is similar to that observed with either agent used as monotherapy; however, both 
frequency and severity of most AEs are increased with the combination (17). 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 12 of 80 
1.3.1.4 Pharmacokinetics 
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of nivolumab was studied in subjects over a dose range of 0.1 to 10 mg/kg 
administered as a single dose or as multiple doses of nivolumab every 2 or 3 weeks. Nivolumab 
clearance (CL) decreases over time, with a mean maximal reduction (% coefficient of variation [CV%]) 
from baseline values of approximately 24.5% (47.6%) resulting in a geometric mean steady state 
clearance (CLss) (CV%) of 8.2 mL/h (53.9%); the decrease in CLss is not considered clinically relevant. 
The geometric mean volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) was 6.8 L (27.3%), and geometric mean 
elimination half-life (t1/2) was 25 days (77.5%). Steady-state concentrations of nivolumab were reached 
by 12 weeks when administered at 3 mg/kg Q2W, and systemic accumulation was approximately 3.7-
fold. The exposure to nivolumab increased dose proportionally over the dose range of 0.1 to 10 mg/kg 
administered every 2 weeks. Additionally, nivolumab has a low potential for drug-drug interactions (see 
Section 5.2.4 of IB). The clearance of nivolumab increased with increasing body weight. The PPK 
analysis suggested that the following factors had no clinically important effect on the CL of nivolumab: 
age (29 to 87 years), gender, race, baseline LDH, PD-L1, solid tumor type, baseline tumor size, and 
hepatic impairment.  
 
Although ECOG status, baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR), albumin, and body weight had an 
effect on nivolumab CL, the effect was not clinically meaningful. PPK analysis suggest that nivolumab 
CL in subjects with cHL was approximately 32% lower relative to subjects with NSCLC; however, the 
lower CL in cHL subjects was not considered to be clinically relevant as nivolumab exposure was not a 
significant predictor for safety risks for these patients. When nivolumab is administered in combination 
with ipilimumab, the CL of nivolumab was increased by 29%, whereas there was no effect on the 
clearance of ipilimumab.  
 
PPK and exposure response analyses have been performed to support use of nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, 
360 mg Q3W, and 480 mg Q4W dosing regimens in subjects with cancer in addition to the 3 mg/kg 
Q2W regimen. A flat dose of nivolumab 240 mg Q2W was selected since it is identical to a dose of 3 
mg/kg for subjects weighing 80 kg, the observed median body weight in nivolumab-treated cancer 
patients, while the nivolumab 360 mg Q3W and 480 mg Q4W regimens allow flexibility of dosing with 
less frequent visits and in combination with other agents using alternative dosing schedules to Q2W. 
Using a PPK model, the overall distributions of nivolumab exposures (Cavgss, Cminss, Cmaxss, and 
Cmin1) are comparable after treatment with either 3 mg/kg or 240 mg nivolumab Q2W. Following 
nivolumab 360 mg Q3W and 480 mg Q4W, Cavgss are expected to be similar to those following 
nivolumab 3 mg/kg or 240 mg Q2W, while Cminss are predicted to be 6% and ~16% lower, 
respectively, and are not considered to be clinically relevant. Following nivolumab 360 mg Q3W and 
480 mg Q4W, Cmaxss are predicted to be approximately ~23% and ~43% greater, respectively, relative 
to that following nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W dosing. However, the range of nivolumab exposures (median 
and 90% prediction intervals) following administration of 240 mg flat Q2W, 360 mg Q3W, and 480 mg 
Q4W regimens across the 35 to 160 kg weight range are predicted to be maintained well below the 
corresponding exposures observed with the well tolerated 10 mg/kg nivolumab Q2W regimen (see 
Section 5.3 of IB) (17). 
 
The PK of nivolumab is linear and in study CA209-003, nivolumab was adequately tolerated up to 10 
mg/kg, no maximum tolerated dose was identified, and the E-R relationship for safety was flat. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 13 of 80 
Population pharmacokinetic modeling results have predicted that the exposure, safety, and efficacy of 
nivolumab administered at 480 mg Q4W will be similar to those with nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W. 
1.3.2 Ipilimumab 
1.3.2.1 Introduction 
Ipilimumab (BMS-734016, MDX010, MDX-CTLA4) is a fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) 
G1κ specific for human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4, cluster of differentiation [CD] 
152), which is expressed on a subset of activated T cells. CTLA-4 is a negative regulator of T-cell 
activity. Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to CTLA-4 and blocks the interaction of 
CTLA-4 with its ligands, CD80/CD86. Blockade of CTLA-4 has been shown to augment T-cell 
activation and proliferation, including the activation and proliferation of tumor infiltrating T-effector 
cells. Inhibition of CTLA-4 signaling can also reduce T-regulatory cell (Treg) function, which may 
contribute to a general increase in T-cell responsiveness, including the anti-tumor response. Yervoy™ 
(ipilimumab) has been approved for use in over 47 countries including the United States (US, Mar-
2011), the European Union (EU, Jul-2011), and Australia (Jul-2011) (20). 
1.3.2.2 Non-clinical Studies 
Ipilimumab has specificity and a high affinity for human CTLA-4. The calculated dissociation constant 
value from an average of several studies was 5.25 nM. Binding of ipilimumab to purified, recombinant 
human CTLA-4 antigen was also demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with half-
maximal binding at 15 ng/mL, whereas saturation was observed at approximately 0.1 µg/mL. No cross-
reactivity was observed against human CD28. Ipilimumab completely blocked binding of B7.1 and B7.2 
to human CTLA-4 at concentrations higher than 6 and 1 µg/mL, respectively (20). 
1.3.2.3 Effects in Humans 
Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Medarex, Inc. (MDX, acquired by BMS in Sep-2009) have co-
sponsored an extensive clinical development program for ipilimumab, encompassing more than 19,500 
subjects (total number of subjects enrolled in ipilimumab studies) in several cancer types in completed 
and ongoing studies, as well as a compassionate use program. The focus of the clinical program is in 
melanoma, prostate cancer, and lung cancer, with advanced melanoma being the most comprehensively 
studied indication. Ipilimumab is being investigated both as monotherapy and in combination with other 
modalities such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and other immunotherapies. Phase 3 programs are 
ongoing in melanoma, prostate cancer, and lung cancer. In melanoma, 2 completed Phase 3 studies 
(MDX010-20 and CA184024) have demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant 
survival benefit in pretreated advanced melanoma and previously untreated advanced melanoma, 
respectively. Refer to Appendix 1 (Yervoy® United States Package Insert [USPI]) and Appendix 2 
(Yervoy Summary of Product Characteristics [SmPC]) for further details. The safety profile of 
ipilimumab is generally consistent across these trials with a) the majority adverse events (AEs) being 
inflammatory in nature, which is consistent with the proposed mechanism of action of ipilimumab; b) 
the same types of such immune-mediated events in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, skin, liver, and 
endocrine system being reported; and c) most of these events being manageable with immune 
suppressive therapies. 
 
In melanoma, 2 BMS-sponsored Phase 3 studies are ongoing in subjects with high-risk Stage III 
melanoma (CA184029, with adjuvant immunotherapy) and pretreated and treatment-naïve advanced 
melanoma (CA184169, 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg ipilimumab). The completed Phase 3 study 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 14 of 80 
(CA184043) evaluated ipilimumab in subjects with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer 
(mCRPC) who had progressed during or following treatment with docetaxel. Eligible subjects were 
randomized to a single dose of bone-directed radiotherapy (RT), followed by either ipilimumab 10 
mg/kg or placebo (799 randomized: 399 ipilimumab, 400 placebo). This study did not meet its primary 
endpoint of overall survival (OS). The hazard ratio (HR) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72, 
1.00) for survival favored ipilimumab but did not reach statistical significance with a P value of 0.053. 
Planned sensitivity analyses favored ipilimumab, where the greatest benefit appeared to be in subgroups 
defined by good prognostic features and low burden of disease. Additional evidence of ipilimumab 
activity observed in the study included a reduced risk of disease progression relative to placebo (HR = 
0.70), superior clinical outcomes compared to placebo in tumor regression, and declines in prostate 
specific antigen (PSA). The safety profile in this study was consistent with the previously defined AE 
profile at the same dose (see Section 5.4.3 and Section 5.5.3 of the Ipilimumab IB) (20).   
 
A second Phase 3 study (CA184095) evaluated ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus placebo in men with 
asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC with no visceral metastases. A 
total of 602 subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (400 subjects to 10 mg/kg ipilimumab and 202 
subjects to placebo). Preliminary data indicate the study did not meet its primary endpoint based on 
intent-to-treat analysis. The HR of 1.11 (95.87% CI: 0.88, 1.39; P value = 0.3667) for OS did not favor 
ipilimumab. A longer median progression-free survival (PFS) interval was observed for the ipilimumab 
group than for the placebo group, which may be indicative of activity of ipilimumab in delaying disease 
progression. The safety profile in this study was generally consistent with the previously defined AE 
profile at the same dose (see Section 5.4.3 and Section 5.5.3.1 of Ipilimumab IB). 
 
In addition, a completed, large Phase 2 study (CA184041) has investigated the addition of ipilimumab to 
carboplatin and paclitaxel using 2 different schedules (concurrent and phased) in subjects with non-
small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC, a secondary endpoint) [Section 5.4.4 
of Ipilimumab IB]. Ipilimumab, given in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin in a phased schedule 
improved immune-related progression-free survival (irPFS) compared to the control treatment, but no 
improvement was seen when ipilimumab was given in a concurrent schedule. Phased ipilimumab also 
improved PFS according to modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria and showed a trend 
for improved OS.  
 
The efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in a phased schedule with carboplatin/paclitaxel is also being 
investigated in a Phase 3 study in subjects with advanced squamous NSCLC (CA184104). The efficacy 
and safety of ipilimumab in a phased schedule with etoposide/platinum in subjects with extensive stage 
disease SCLC is being investigated in a Phase 3 study (CA184156). In Study CA184104, the last 
patient, last visit was achieved in June-2015, and database lock occurred on 01-Sep-2015. No final data 
are currently available, but preliminary data indicate that no new safety concerns were identified in the 
course of standard clinical safety monitoring of the study. In Study CA184156, preliminary data indicate 
the primary endpoint of prolonging survival was not achieved, but no new safety signals were identified. 
 
Ipilimumab is also in clinical development in combination with nivolumab. The combination is 
approved in the US for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Information regarding safety and efficacy 
can be found in the nivolumab Investigator Brochure (17, 21). 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 15 of 80 
The unique immune-based mechanism of action is reflected in the clinical patterns of anti-cancer 
activity in some patients. Ipilimumab induces an immunologic response, and measurable clinical effects 
emerge after the immunological effects. Tumor infiltration with lymphocytes and the associated 
inflammation (documented by biopsy in some subjects) is likely the cornerstone of the effect of 
ipilimumab and can manifest in various patterns of clinical activity leading to tumor control. In some 
cases, inflammation may not be noted by radiological examination, and objective response is observed 
with the first tumor assessment in a manner seen in patients receiving other types of anti-cancer 
treatments. In other cases, response may be preceded by an apparent increase in initial tumor volume 
and/or the appearance of new lesions, which may be mistaken for tumor progression on radiological 
evaluations. Therefore, in patients who are not experiencing rapid clinical deterioration, confirmation of 
progression is recommended (at the investigator’s discretion) to better understand the prognosis, as well 
as to avoid unnecessarily initiating potentially toxic alternative therapies in subjects who might be 
benefiting from treatment. Immune-related response criteria were developed based on these observations 
to systematically categorize novel patterns of clinical activity and are currently being prospectively 
evaluated in clinical studies. 
 
In metastatic diseases, stabilization is more common than response, and in some instances is associated 
with a slow, steady decline in tumor burden over many months, sometimes improving to partial and/or 
complete responses (CRs). Thus, the immune-based mechanism of action of ipilimumab results in 
durable disease control, sometimes with novel patterns of response, which contribute to its unique 
improvement in OS.  
 
The unique immune-based mechanism of action is also reflected in the safety profile. The most common 
treatment-related AEs are inflammatory in nature, consistent with the mechanism of action of the drug 
and generally medically manageable with topical and/or systemic immunosuppressants. Such 
immunological safety events are described as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or immune-
mediated adverse reactions (imARs). The irAEs are described as AEs of unknown etiology, which were 
consistent with an immune phenomenon and considered causally related to drug exposure by 
investigators. The irAEs primarily involve the GI tract and skin. Immune-related AEs in the liver were 
also observed, particularly in subjects receiving 10 mg/kg. Endocrinopathy and neuropathy were 
important irAEs that were observed less frequently. The imARs were adjudicated in a blinded fashion 
based on Sponsor-physician data review to exclude noninflammatory etiologies, such as infection or 
tumor progression, and to consider available evidence of inflammation, such as tumor biopsies or 
responsiveness to steroids, in an effort to determine whether specific AEs or abnormal hepatic 
laboratory values were likely to be immune mediated and associated with ipilimumab treatment. 
 
The early diagnosis of inflammatory events is important to initiate therapy and minimize complications. 
Inflammatory events are generally manageable using symptomatic or immuno-suppressive therapy as 
recommended through detailed diagnosis and management guidelines. The management guidelines for 
general irAEs and ipilimumab-related GI toxicities, hepatitis, endocrinopathy, and neuropathy are 
described in Section 7 and Appendix 3 of the Ipilimumab IB.  
 
A program-wide independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) reviews data from the ipilimumab 
studies, allowing for an ongoing safety and benefit/risk assessment in subjects receiving ipilimumab. 
The DMC charter includes explicit stopping rules for some studies, allowing the DMC to recommend 
discontinuing further treatment across the ipilimumab program, if necessary.   

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 16 of 80 
 
In summary, ipilimumab offers clinically meaningful and statistically significant survival benefit to 
patients with pretreated advanced melanoma (as 3 mg/kg monotherapy compared to the melanoma 
peptide vaccine gp100) and previously untreated advanced melanoma (at 10 mg/kg in combination with 
dacarbazine [DTIC] compared to DTIC alone) and evidence of clinical activity in randomized studies in 
other tumor types. These findings, together with evidence of a safety profile that is manageable with 
careful monitoring and appropriate intervention for treatment of immune-related toxicities, suggest an 
acceptable benefit to risk ratio (20).  
1.3.2.4 Pharmacokinetics 
The PK of ipilimumab has been extensively studied in subjects with melanoma, at the 3 and 10-mg/kg 
doses administered as a 1.5-hour IV infusion. The PK of ipilimumab was characterized by population 
PK (PPK) analysis and determined to be linear and time invariant in the dose range of 0.3 to 10 mg/kg. 
The summary of PK parameters after single and multiple doses of ipilimumab in subjects with advanced 
melanoma from Studies MDX010-15, CA184007, and CA184008 (with intensive PK samples available) 
are listed in Table 5.2.1-1 of Ipilimumab IB. 
 
The PPK of ipilimumab was studied in 785 subjects (3200 serum concentrations) with advanced 
melanoma in 4 Phase 2 studies (CA184004, CA184007, CA184008, and CA184022),601 Phase 3 study 
(CA184024), and 1 Phase 1 study (CA184078). The PPK analysis demonstrated that the PK of 
ipilimumab is linear, the exposures are dose proportional across the tested dose range of 0.3 to 10 
mg/kg, and the model parameters are time-invariant, similar to that determined by noncompartmental 
analyses.  
 
Upon repeated dosing of ipilimumab, administered q3w, minimal systemic accumulation was observed 
by an accumulation index of 1.5-fold or less, and ipilimumab steady-state concentrations were achieved 
by the third dose. The ipilimumab CL of 16.8 mL/h from PPK analysis is consistent with that 
determined by noncompartmental PK analysis and shown in Table 5.2.1-1. The terminal T-HALF and 
Vss of ipilimumab calculated from the model were 15.4 days and 7.47 L, respectively, which are 
consistent with that determined by noncompartmental analysis. Volume of central compartment (Vc) 
and peripheral compartment were found to be 4.35 and 3.28 L, respectively, suggesting that ipilimumab 
first distributes into plasma volume and, subsequently, into extracellular fluid space. CL of ipilimumab 
and Vc were found to increase with increase in BW. However, there was no significant increase in 
exposure with increase in BW when dosed on a milligram/kilogram basis, supporting dosing of 
ipilimumab based on a weight normalized regimen. The PK of ipilimumab is not affected by age, 
gender, race, and immunogenicity (anti-drug antibody [ADA] status); concomitant use of chemotherapy; 
prior therapy; BW; performance status; or tumor type. Other covariates had effects that were either not 
statistically significant or were of minimal clinical relevance (20). 
1.4 
Rationale for Study 
Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, was one of the first therapies developed to target regulatory T-cell 
function, and it has demonstrated improved PFS in a phase II trial of advanced NSCLC (22). More 
recently, trials involving another negative regulatory pathway of T-cell function, PD-1/PD-L1, have 
demonstrated encouraging results in metastatic NSCLC (23-27), and currently, there are three Food and 
Drug Administration (FDA)-approved PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for metastatic NSCLC. The 
combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade has been shown to be more effective than monotherapy in 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 17 of 80 
melanoma (21), and thus there is interest in expanding combination immunotherapy to NSCLC.  The 
Checkmate 012 trial was a phase I, multi-cohort trial looking at the combination of nivolumab and 
ipilimumab in varying doses in metastatic NSCLC. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab 
appeared tolerable with encouraging clinical activity, particularly in the cohorts with nivolumab 3mg/kg 
every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 or 12 weeks. Objective response rates for these two 
cohorts were 38% and 47% respectively and were numerically higher for patients with PD-L1 
expression of 1% or greater. The median duration of response was not yet reached in either cohort (28).  
Based on experience in other tumor types suggesting that greater ipilimumab exposure is associated with 
greater activity (29, 30), Bristol-Myers Squibb has elected to move forward with development of the 
nivolumab 3mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks regimen. Another phase 1b 
trial of the PD-L1 inhibitor, Durvalumab, in combination with a CTLA-4 inhibitor, Tremelimumab, has 
also shown a manageable safety profile with evidence of clinical activity in patients with NSCLC (31).  
Based on these encouraging results, further investigation into combination immunotherapy is warranted, 
and phase III trials are already ongoing looking at different regimens in the metastatic setting.  
 
There is pre-clinical rationale for the use of immunotherapeutic strategies following the use of ionizing 
radiation.  Radiation has been shown to be associated with an abscopal effect which is felt to be 
immune-mediated, though this phenomenon is rarely seen with radiation alone (32).  In animal models, 
the addition of checkpoint inhibitors to radiation has demonstrated an additive effect both to the radiated 
tumor and to sites of distant disease (32, 33).  Furthermore, radiation alters the immune and tumor 
microenvironments in a number of ways including: 1) release of neoantigens, 2) promotion of cross-
priming of tumor specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL), 3) stimulation of the immune effector 
function of CTLs, and 4) neutralization of the immunosuppressive effects of the tumor 
microenvironment (34).   
 
Based on this rationale, two trials have been conducted evaluating the benefit of adding PD-1 or PD-L1 
blockade as consolidation therapy following standard of care chemoradiation for unresectable stage III 
NSCLC.  The first trial, PACIFIC, evaluated the role of consolidation Durvalumab versus no therapy 
following chemoradiation. Consolidation Durvalumab demonstrated imporoved median, 12-month, and 
18-month PFS with only a very modest increase in overall toxicity, and it is now FDA-approved for use 
in this setting. The second trial, completed by the Hoosier Cancer Research Network (HCRN), assessed 
the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in this setting. That trial also confirmed the safety and 
feasibility of giving consolidation checkpoint blockade following concurrent chemoradiation, and the 
efficacy data from that trial will be presented at ASCO 2018. 
 
In summary, unresectable stage III NSCLC represents an area with a need for improved treatment 
strategies as current survival outcomes are poor. The current standard of care is concurrent 
chemoradiation followed by consideration of consolidation Durvalumab.  This trial looks to establish the 
safety and efficacy of consolidation Nivolumab alone and to evaluate whether combination 
immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab may improve upon outcomes with single-agent 
checkpoint blockade Previous trials in the metastatic setting, both in NSCLC and other tumor types, 
have suggested that combination immunotherapy may be more effective than monotherapy. This 
finding, in combination with the PACIFIC data, preclinical rationale for immunotherapy after radiation, 
and the safety and efficacy data from Checkmate 012, suggests that combination immunotherapy with 
nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone is worth investigating in unresectable stage III NSCLC. 
In this trial, the Nivolumab only arm will be compared to the historical control which was validated by 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 18 of 80 
the placebo arm of PACIFIC (18-month PFS of 27%), and the combination immunotherapy arm will be 
compared to the Durvalumab arm of PACIFIC (18-month PFS of 44%) (15).  
2. 
STUDY OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS 
2.1 
Objectives 
2.1.1 Primary Objectives 
 Arm 1- To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab alone following concurrent 
chemoradiation improves 18-month progression free survival (PFS) relative to a historical 
control of chemoradiation alone, in subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB 
NSCLC 
 Arm 2- To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab following 
concurrent chemoradiation improves 18-month PFS relative to a historical control of 
chemoradiation followed by single agent checkpoint inhibitor, in subjects with inoperable or 
unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC 
2.1.2 Secondary Objectives 
 To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab alone following concurrent 
chemoradiation improves time to metastatic disease and overall survival (OS) relative to a 
historical control of chemoradiation alone in subjects with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA 
or IIIB NSCLC (Arm 1). 
 To determine if consolidation therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab following concurrent 
chemoradiation improves time to metastatic disease and overall survival (OS) relative to a 
historical control of chemoradiation followed by single agent checkpoint inhibitor in subjects 
with inoperable or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC (Arm 2).   
 To assess toxicity and tolerability of consolidation therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or 
nivolumab alone following concurrent chemoradiation in subjects with inoperable or 
unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC. 
2.1.3 Correlative/Exploratory Objectives 
 To assess PD-L1, CD4, CD8, expression levels in the tumor samples of subjects with inoperable 
or unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC and correlate with PFS, OS, time to metastatic 
disease, and treatment toxicity. 
 To assess associations between DNA, RNA, microRNA, DNA methylation, protein expression, 
lipidomic profiling, immune markers, protein biomarker panels, and other markers and efficacy 
and toxicity of treatment.   
 To explore whether clinical characteristics may be associated with the development of 
pneumonitis and correlate with PFS, OS, time to metastatic disease, and treatment toxicity. 
 To explore whether radiation treatment plan deviation or lung dosimetric factors may be 
associated with the development of pneumonitis and correlate with PFS, OS, time to metastatic 
disease, and treatment toxicity. 
 To examine characteristics of BAL samples (e.g cytokines and chemockines) in patients who 
develop pneumonitis.  

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 19 of 80 
2.2 
Endpoints 
2.2.1 Primary Endpoints 
 PFS at 18 months. PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the criteria for disease 
progression is met as defined by RECIST 1.1 or death as a result of any cause. 
o Arm 1- We hypothesize that consolidation with nivolumab alone will improve 18-month PFS 
from 30% with observation alone to 44%.   
o Arm 2- We hypothesize that consolidation with nivolumab plus ipilimumab will improve 18-
month PFS from 44% with single agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition to 59% with combination 
immunotherapy.  
2.2.2 Secondary Endpoints 
 Overall survival will be defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. 
 Time to metastatic disease will be defined as the time from randomization until evidence of 
disease outside of the radiated field. 
 Toxicities will be defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI 
CTCAE) v4. 
3. 
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 
3.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
Subject must meet all of the following applicable inclusion criteria to participate in this study: 
 
1. Written informed consent and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information. 
NOTE: HIPAA authorization may be included in the informed consent or obtained separately. 
 
2. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent. 
 
3. ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1 within 14 days prior to registration. 
 
4. Histological or cytological confirmation of NSCLC. A pathology report confirming the diagnosis of 
NSCLC must be obtained and reviewed by the treating physician prior to registration to study. 
 
5. Must have unresectable or inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB disease according to the 7th edition IASLC 
stage classification for lung cancer. Subjects must be considered unresectable or inoperable based on 
the judgment of the treating physician. 
 
6. Subjects must have completed concurrent chemoradiation with a platinum doublet and a dose of 
radiation ranging from 59.4-66.6 Gy. Subjects must have stable disease or disease response as 
evidenced on CT or PET scan evaluation. For those eligible, protocol therapy should begin within 56 
days of completing chemoradiation  
OR 
Subjects must have completed up to 2 cycles of consolidation therapy started within 56 days of 
completion of radiation. After completion of consolidation chemotherapy, subjects must have stable 
disease or disease response as evidenced by CT or PET scan evaluation. For those eligible, protocol 
therapy should begin within 56 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 20 of 80 
 
7. Prior cancer treatment must be completed between 1-56 days prior to registration and the subject 
must have recovered from all reversible acute toxic effects of the regimen (other than alopecia) to 
≤Grade 1 or baseline. 
 
8. Demonstrate adequate organ function as defined in the table below; all screening labs to be obtained 
within 14 days prior to registration. 
 
System 
Laboratory Value 
Hematological 
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)
≥ 1.5 K/mm3 
Hemoglobin (Hgb) 
≥ 9 g/dL. Transfusion is allowed. 
Platelets 
≥100,000/mcl
Renal 
Serum creatinine OR 
Measured or calculated creatinine clearance 
(GFR can also be used in place of creatinine 
or CrCl) 
≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) OR 
≥ 60 mL/min for subjects with creatinine 
levels >1.5 x institutional ULN 
Hepatic 
Bilirubin 
≤ 1.5 × ULN OR 
Direct bilirubin of ≤ ULN for subjects with 
total bilirubin levels of >1.5x ULN 
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 
≤2.5 × ULN 
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 
≤2.5 × ULN 
Coagulation 
International Normalized Ratio (INR) or 
Prothrombin Time (PT) 
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time 
(aPTT) 
≤1.5 X ULN unless subject is receiving 
anticoagulant therapy as long as 
PT/INR/PTT is within therapeutic range of 
intended use of anticoagulants 
 
9. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test 
(minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within 7 days prior to registration. 
NOTE: Women are considered of childbearing potential unless they are surgically sterile (have 
undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or are post-
menopausal. Menopause is defined clinically as 12 months of amenorrhea in a woman over age 45 in 
the absence of other biological or physiological causes. In addition, women under the age of 62 must 
have a documented serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level greater than 40 mIU/mL to be 
considered post-menopausal. 
 
10. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to abstain from heterosexual activity or use an 
effective method of contraception from the time of informed consent until 23 weeks after treatment 
discontinuation. See Section 5.5.2 for adequate methods of contraception. 
 
11. Men who are sexually active with WOCBP must use any contraceptive method with a failure rate of 
less than 1% per year. Men receiving study drug and who are sexually active with WOCBP will be 
instructed to adhere to contraception for a period of 31 weeks after the last dose of investigational 
product. See Section 5.5.2 for methods of contraception. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 21 of 80 
12. As determined by the enrolling physician or protocol designee, ability of the subject to understand 
and comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study 
 
3.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
Subjects meeting any of the criteria below may not participate in the study: 
 
1. Pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration 
of the trial, starting with the pre-screening or screening visit through 23 weeks (female) or 31 weeks 
(male) after the last dose of trial treatment. 
 
2. Active central nervous system (CNS) metastases. If symptomatic or without prior brain imaging, 
subjects must undergo a head computed tomography (CT) scan or brain MRI within 28 days prior to 
registration for protocol therapy to exclude brain metastases.  
 
3. Treatment with any investigational agent within 28 days prior to registration for protocol therapy.  
 
4. Prior chemotherapy, adjuvant therapy, or radiotherapy for lung cancer other than standard concurrent 
chemoradiation or up to 2 cycles of consolidation as described above. 
 
5. Prior therapy with a PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 or CTLA-4 inhibitor or a lung cancer-specific vaccine 
therapy 
 
6. Previously received a solid organ transplant or allogeneic progenitor/stem cell transplant. 
 
7. Presence of metastatic disease (stage IV NSCLC) is not allowed. Subjects must be evaluated with a 
CT or PET scan prior to registration for protocol therapy to exclude metastatic disease. 
 
8. Active second cancers. 
 
9. Evidence of active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment within the past 90 days or a 
documented history of clinically severe autoimmune disease, or a syndrome that requires systemic 
steroids or immunosuppressive agents. Subjects with vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy 
would be an exception to this rule. Subjects that require intermittent use of bronchodilators or local 
steroid injections would not be excluded from the study. Subjects with hypothyroidism stable on 
hormone replacement or Sjogren’s syndrome will not be excluded from the study 
 
10. Interstitial lung disease or history of pneumonitis requiring treatment with corticosteroids 
 
11. Diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving chronic systemic corticosteroid therapy or other 
immunosuppressive therapy (excludes inhaled corticosteroids) within 7 days of first dose of study 
drug 
 
12. History of psychiatric illness or social situations that would limit compliance with study 
requirements 
 
13. Clinically significant acute infection requiring systemic antibacterial, antifungal, or antiviral therapy 
including:  
a. tuberculosis (clinical evaluation that includes clinical history, physical examination, and 
radiographic findings, and TB testing in line with local practice),  

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 22 of 80 
b. hepatitis B (known positive HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) result),  
c. hepatitis C, or  
d. human immunodeficiency virus (positive HIV 1/2 antibodies).   
NOTES: Patients with a past or resolved HBV infection (defined as the presence of hepatitis B core 
antibody [anti-HBc] and absence of HBsAg) are eligible. Patients positive for hepatitis C (HCV) 
antibody are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction is negative for HCV RNA. Subjects with 
HIV/AIDS with adequate antiviral therapy to control viral load would be allowed if they are stable 
and have been on treatment for ≥ 4 weeks prior to first dose of study drug(s). Subjects with viral 
hepatitis with controlled viral load would be allowed while on suppressive antiviral therapy.  Testing 
not required.    
 
14. Has a history or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might 
confound the results of the trial, interfere with the subject’s participation for the full duration of the 
trial, or is not in the best interest of the subject to participate, in the opinion of the site investigator. 
 
15. Hypersensitivity to nivolumab, ipilimumab, or any of their excipients. 
 
16. Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to planned start of study therapy. 
Note:  Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally inactivated flu vaccines and are 
allowed; however, intranasal influenza vaccines (e.g., Flu-Mist®) are live attenuated vaccines, and 
are not allowed. 
 
4. 
SUBJECT REGISTRATION 
All subjects must be registered through BTCRC Administrative Headquarters’ electronic data capture 
(EDC) system OnCore. A subject is considered registered when an ‘On Study’ date is entered into 
OnCore. 
 
Subjects must be registered and randomized prior to starting protocol therapy. Subjects must be 
randomized within 1 business day of registration and begin therapy within 5 business days of 
randomization/registration.  
 
5. 
TREATMENT PLAN 
This study is an open label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial of consolidation immunotherapy with 
either nivolumab alone or the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab following concurrent 
chemoradiation in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.   
 
Patients with unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC (unresectable as defined by treating physician) will 
be treated outside this study with concurrent chemoradiation with a platinum doublet in addition to 
standard dose radiation (dosing can range from 59.4 Gy to 66.6 Gy). If repeat imaging within 56 days 
following completion of chemoradiation or consolidation shows no progressive or metastatic disease, 
the patients will be eligible for enrollment on the study.   
5.1 
Randomization and Stratification 
At the time of enrollment, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either nivolumab 
480mg IV every 4 weeks or the combination of nivolumab 240mg IV every 2 weeks with ipilimumab 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 23 of 80 
1mg/kg IV every 6 weeks. We chose a 1:1 randomization because the sample sizes in the two arms are 
approximately the same. Due to the slightly different sample sizes in the two arms, enrollment will be 
monitored closely and stopped when each arm reaches it goal. Consolidation immunotherapy will be 
continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to a total of 24 weeks (see schema).   
 
Subjects will be stratified by stage (IIIA vs. IIIB) and histology (squamous vs. non-squamous vs. NOS).  
5.2 
Study Drug Administration and Treatment Schedule 
5.2.1 Dose Calculations 
Arm 1: The dose of nivolumab will be a fixed dose (not based on subject’s weight) at 480mg.  
 
Arm 2: The dose of nivolumab will be a fixed dose at 240mg. The dose of ipilimumab will be weight-
based at 1mg/kg. Weight should be based on a recording taken within 3 days of each study drug 
administration.  Dosing only needs to be re-calculated if the current weight differs from the baseline 
weight by ≥10%.  
5.2.2 Pre-medications 
Subjects may receive Ondansetron 8mg IVPB in 50ml of normal saline infused over 10 minutes prior to 
immunotherapy on each day of treatment (or per institutional standards).  
 
For subjects who experience a grade 1 or grade 2 infusion reaction, prior to subsequent infusions it is 
recommended that diphenhydramine 50 mg (or equivalent) and/or paracetamol (acetaminophen) 325 to 
1000 mg should be administered at least 30 minutes before additional nivolumab or ipilimumab 
administrations. If necessary, corticosteroids (recommended dose: up to 25 mg of IV hydrocortisone or 
equivalent) may be used. 
5.2.3 Arm 1- Nivolumab Alone 
Drug 
Dose 
Route 
Schedule1 
Cycle 
Length 
Total 
Number of 
Cycles 
Nivolumab 
480mg 
IV 
Every 4 weeks 
4 weeks 
6 
1 A window of +/- 3 days may be applied to all study visits to accommodate observed holidays, 
inclement weather, scheduling conflicts etc. Date and time of each drug administration should be 
clearly documented in subject’s chart and electronic case report forms (eCRFs). 
5.2.3.1 Arm 1: Nivolumab Administration 
Nivolumab 480 mg will be administered as a 30 minute IV infusion on Day 1 of each 28 day cycle. Sites 
should make every effort to target infusion timing to be as close to 30 minutes as possible. However, 
given the variability of infusion pumps from site to site, a window of +/-10 minutes is permitted (i.e., 
infusion time is 30 minutes: +/-10 min).  Treatment will continue for up to 6 cycles, in the absence of 
prohibitive toxicities or disease progression. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 24 of 80 
5.2.4 
Arm 2- Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab 
Drug 
Dose 
Route 
Schedule 
Cycle 
Length 
Total 
Number of 
Cycles 
Nivolumab (1st) 
240mg 
IV 
Every 2 weeks1 
6 weeks  
(42 days) 
4 
Ipilimumab (2nd) 
1mg/kg 
IV 
Every 6 weeks2 
1 A window of ±3 days may be applied to all nivolumab treatments to accommodate observed 
holidays, inclement weather, scheduling conflicts etc as long as nivolumab is not given any earlier 
than 12 days from the previous dose.   
2 A window of ±5 days may be applied to all ipilimumab treatments to accommodate observed 
holidays, inclement weather, scheduling conflicts, etc.  
Date and time of each drug administration should be clearly documented in subject’s chart and 
electronic case report forms (eCRFs). 
5.2.4.1 Arm 2: Nivolumab Administration 
Nivolumab 240mg will be administered as a 30 minute IV infusion on Day 1, 15, and 29 of each 42 day 
cycle. Nivolumab should not be given any earlier than 12 days from the previous dose. Sites should 
make every effort to target infusion timing to be as close to 30 minutes as possible. However, given the 
variability of infusion pumps from site to site, a window of +/-10 minutes is permitted (i.e., infusion 
time is 30 minutes: +/-10 min).  Treatment will continue for up to 4 cycles, in the absence of prohibitive 
toxicities or disease progression. 
5.2.4.2 Arm 2: Ipilimumab Administration 
Ipilimumab 1mg/kg will be administered as a 30 minute IV infusion on Day 1 of each 42 day cycle. 
Sites should make every effort to target infusion timing to be as close to 30 minutes as possible. 
However, given the variability of infusion pumps from site to site, a window of +/-10 minutes is 
permitted (i.e., infusion time is 30 minutes: +/-10 min).  Treatment will continue for up to 4 cycles, in 
the absence of prohibitive toxicities or disease progression. 
 
On day 1 of cycle 1, nivolumab will be given first, followed by 30 minutes of monitoring, and then 
ipilimumab given second, followed by 30 minutes of monitoring. If the subject does not have an 
infusion reaction during the first cycle, the post-ipilimumab monitoring may be discontinued for 
subsequent cycles at the discretion of the treating physician. Day 1 monitoring between the nivolumab/ 
ipilimumab infusions will continue throughout all 4 cycles. Post nivolumab monitoring on days 15 and 
29 is not mandatory and should follow the guidelines of the local infusion center. 
5.3 
Concomitant Medications 
All concomitant medications received within 28 days before the first dose of trial treatment and 30 days 
after the last dose of trial treatment should be recorded. Concomitant medications administered more 
than 30 days after the last dose of trial treatment should be recorded for serious adverse events (SAE) as 
defined in Section 11.1.2. 
5.3.1 Allowed Concomitant Medications 
All treatments that the site investigator considers necessary for a subject’s welfare may be administered 
at the discretion of the site investigator in keeping with the community standards of medical care. All 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 25 of 80 
concomitant medication will be recorded on the case report form (CRF) including all prescription, over-
the-counter (OTC), herbal supplements, and IV medications and fluids. If changes occur during the trial 
period, documentation of drug dosage, frequency, route, and date may also be included on the CRF. 
5.3.2 Prohibited Concomitant Medications 
Medications or vaccinations specifically prohibited in the exclusion criteria are not allowed during the 
ongoing trial.  If there is a clinical indication for one of these or other medications or vaccinations 
specifically prohibited during the trial, discontinuation from trial therapy or vaccination may be 
required.  The site investigator should discuss any questions regarding this with BTCRC AHQ who will 
then communicate with the sponsor-investigator and Bristol-Myers Squibb Clinical team regarding the 
situation.  The final decision on any supportive therapy or vaccination rests with the site investigator 
and/or the subject's primary physician. There are no prohibited therapies during the Post-Treatment 
Follow-up Phase. 
 
Subjects are prohibited from receiving the following therapies during the Screening and Treatment 
Phase of this trial: 
 Antineoplastic systemic chemotherapy or biological therapy not specified in this protocol 
 Immunotherapy not specified in this protocol 
 Chemotherapy not specified in this protocol 
 Investigational agents other than nivolumab or ipilimumab  
 Radiation therapy  
 Live vaccines within 30 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment and while participating in the 
trial. Examples of live vaccines include, but are not limited to, the following: measles, mumps, 
rubella, varicella/zoster, chicken pox, yellow fever, rabies, BCG, and typhoid (oral) vaccine. 
Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally killed virus vaccines and are allowed; 
however intranasal influenza vaccines (e.g. Flu-Mist®) are live attenuated vaccines, and are not 
allowed. 
 Systemic glucocorticoids (>10 mg prednisone equivalent) for any purpose other than to modulate 
symptoms from an event of clinical interest of suspected immunologic etiology.  Brief, limited use 
of systemic corticosteroids (≤7 days) are permitted where such use is considered standard of care 
(e.g. as premedication for contrast allergy or for COPD exacerbation).  Inhaled or topical steroids, 
and adrenal replacement doses of steroids (for example prednisone 10mg daily) are permitted 
while on study.  
 
Subjects who, in the assessment by the site investigator, require the use of any of the aforementioned 
treatments for clinical management should be removed from the trial.  
 
There are no prohibited therapies during the Post-Treatment Follow-up Phase. 
5.4 
Supportive Care 
Subjects should receive appropriate supportive care measures as deemed necessary by the site 
investigator. Suggested supportive care measures for the management of adverse events with potential 
immunologic etiology are outlined below. Where appropriate, these guidelines include the use of oral or 
intravenous treatment with corticosteroids as well as additional anti-inflammatory agents if symptoms 
do not improve with administration of corticosteroids.   Note that several courses of steroid tapering may 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 26 of 80 
be necessary as symptoms may worsen when the steroid dose is decreased. For each disorder, attempts 
should be made to rule out other causes such as metastatic disease or bacterial or viral infection, which 
might require additional supportive care. The treatment guidelines are intended to be applied when the 
investigator determines the events to be related to nivolumab or ipilimumab.  
5.4.1 Suggested supportive care measures for the management of adverse events that are 
related to nivolumab or ipilimumab 
Immuno-oncology (I-O) agents are associated with AEs that can differ in severity and duration than AEs 
caused by other therapeutic classes. Nivolumab and ipilimumab are considered immuno-oncology agents 
in this protocol. Early recognition and management of AEs associated with immuno-oncology agents 
may mitigate severe toxicity. Management algorithms have been developed to assist investigators in 
assessing and managing the following groups of AEs: Gastrointestinal, Renal, Pulmonary, Hepatic, 
Endocrinopathies, Skin, Neurological. 
 
For subjects expected to require more than 4 weeks of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressants to 
manage an AE, consider recommendations provided in the algorithms. These algorithms are found in 
Appendix 1. The guidance provided in these algorithms should not replace the Investigator’s medical 
judgment but should complement it. 
 
Patients on IV steroids may be switched to an equivalent dose of oral corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) at 
start of tapering or earlier, once sustained clinical improvement is observed. Lower bioavailability of 
oral corticosteroids should be taken into account when switching to the equivalent dose of oral 
corticosteroids.  
 
Patients who are started on steroids for management of an immune-related event should not resume 
immunotherapy until steroids have been tapered to ≤ prednisone 10mg daily or an equivalent dose of an 
alternative corticosteroid.  
 
 Management of Infusion Reactions:  Acute infusion reactions (which can include cytokine release 
syndrome, angioedema, or anaphylaxis) are different from allergic/hypersensitive reactions, although 
some of the manifestations are common to both AEs.  
 
The table below shows treatment guidelines for subjects who experience an infusion reaction associated 
with administration of nivolumab. 
 
Management of Infusion Related Reaction (IRR), Allergic Reaction, Hypersensitivity reaction or 
Bronchospasm from Nivolumab or Ipilimumab 
Description 
Action 
CTCAE Grade 1 IRR, 
allergic reaction or 
bronchospasm1  
Remain at bedside and monitor subject until recovery from symptoms. 
CTCAE Grade 2 IRR, 
allergic reaction or 
bronchospasm1  
Stop the infusion, begin an IV infusion of normal saline, and treat the 
subject with diphenhydramine 50 mg IV (or equivalent) and/or 
paracetamol 325 to 1000 mg (acetaminophen); remain at bedside and 
monitor subject until resolution of symptoms. Corticosteroid or 
bronchodilator therapy may also be administered as appropriate. If the 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 27 of 80 
infusion is interrupted, then restart the infusion at 50% of the original 
infusion rate when symptoms resolve; if no further complications ensue 
after 30 minutes, the rate may be increased to 100% of the original 
infusion rate. Monitor subject closely. If symptoms recur, then no further 
nivolumab will be administered at that visit. Administer 
diphenhydramine 50 mg IV, and remain at bedside and monitor the 
subject until resolution of symptoms. The amount of study drug infused 
must be recorded on the electronic case report form (eCRF). 
CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 
IRR, allergic reaction, 
bronchospasm or 
hypersensitivity 
reaction2  
Immediately discontinue infusion of nivolumab. Begin an IV infusion of 
normal saline, and treat the subject as follows. Recommend 
bronchodilators, epinephrine 0.2 to 1 mg of a 1:1,000 solution for 
subcutaneous administration or 0.1 to 0.25 mg of a 1:10,000 solution 
injected slowly for IV administration, and/or diphenhydramine 50 mg IV 
with methylprednisolone 100 mg IV (or equivalent), as needed. Subject 
should be monitored until the investigator is comfortable that the 
symptoms will not recur. Nivolumab or ipilimumab will be permanently 
discontinued. Investigators should follow their institutional guidelines 
for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Remain at bedside and monitor subject 
until recovery from symptoms. In the case of late-occurring 
hypersensitivity symptoms (eg, appearance of a localized or generalized 
pruritis within 1 week after treatment), symptomatic treatment may be 
given (eg, oral antihistamine, or corticosteroids). 
1For any ≤Grade 2 IRR, allergic reaction or bronchospasm, see Section 5.1.2 for recommended premedication 
for subsequent infusions.  
2Hypersensitivity reactions included in CTCAEv4 include anaphylaxis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic 
epidermal necrolysis; in the case of late-occurring hypersensitivity symptoms (e.g., appearance of a localized or 
generalized pruritis within 1 week after treatment), symptomatic treatment may be given (e.g., oral 
antihistamine, or corticosteroids). 
5.5 
Diet/Activity/Other Considerations 
5.5.1 Diet 
Subjects should maintain a normal diet unless modifications are required to manage an AE such as 
diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. 
5.5.2 Contraception 
Women of childbearing potential are defined as any female who has experienced menarche and who has 
not undergone surgical sterilization (hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy) or who is not 
postmenopausal. Menopause is defined clinically as 12 months of amenorrhea in a woman over 45 in the 
absence of other biological or physiological causes. In addition, women under the age of 62 must have a 
documented serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level greater than 40 mIU/mL to be considered 
post-menopausal. 
 
Men who are sexually active with WOCBP must use any contraceptive method with a failure rate of less 
than 1% per year Men receiving study drug and who are sexually active with WOCBP will be instructed 
to adhere to contraception for a period of 31 weeks after the last dose of investigational product. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 28 of 80 
Subjects should be informed that taking the study medication may involve unknown risks to the fetus 
(unborn baby) if pregnancy were to occur during the study. In order to participate in the study they must 
adhere to the contraception requirements (described above) for the duration of the study and during the 
follow-up period. If there is any question that a subject will not reliably comply with the requirements 
for contraception, that subject should not be entered into the study. 
5.5.2.1 Highly Effective Methods of Contraception 
 Male condoms with spermicide 
 Hormonal methods of contraception including combined oral contraceptive pills, vaginal 
ring, injectables, implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs) such as Mirena by WOCBP 
subject or male subject’s WOCBP partner Female partners of male subjects participating in 
the study may use hormone based contraceptives as one of the acceptable methods of 
contraception since they will not be receiving study drug 
 Nonhormonal IUDs, such as ParaGard 
 Tubal ligation  
 Vasectomy 
 Complete Abstinence* 
*Complete abstinence is defined as complete avoidance of heterosexual intercourse and is 
an acceptable form of contraception for all study drugs. Subjects who choose complete 
abstinence are not required to use a second method of contraception. Acceptable alternate 
methods of highly effective contraception must be discussed in the event that the subject 
chooses to forego complete abstinence. 
5.5.2.2 Less Effective Methods of Contraception 
 Diaphragm with spermicide 
 Cervical cap with spermicide 
 Vaginal sponge 
 Male Condom without spermicide  
 Progestin only pills by WOCBP subject or male subject’s WOCBP partner  
 Female Condom*. 
* A male and female condom must not be used together 
5.5.3 Use in Pregnancy 
If a subject inadvertently becomes pregnant while on treatment with nivolumab or ipilimumab, the 
subject will immediately be removed from the study. The site will contact the subject at least monthly 
and document the subject’s status until the pregnancy has been completed or terminated. The outcome of 
the pregnancy will be reported to the Big Ten Research Consortium (BTCRC) within 24 hours of 
discovery of event and BTCRC will notify the sponsor-investigator and Bristol-Myers Squibb within 24 
hours if the outcome is a serious adverse experience (e.g., death, abortion, congenital anomaly, or other 
disabling or life-threatening complication to the mother or newborn). The site investigator will make 
every effort to obtain permission to follow the outcome of the pregnancy and report the condition of the 
fetus or newborn to BTCRC who will report to Bristol-Myers Squibb.  If a male subject impregnates his 
female partner the study personnel at the site must be informed immediately and the pregnancy reported 
to the BTCRC who will report the event to Bristol-Myers Squibb and followed as described above. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 29 of 80 
6. 
TOXICITIES AND DOSE DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS 
The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4 will be used to grade adverse 
events.  
 
Subjects enrolled in this study will be evaluated clinically and with standard laboratory tests before and 
at regular intervals during their participation in this study as specified in Study Calendar & Evaluations. 
 
Subjects will be evaluated for adverse events (all grades), serious adverse events, and adverse events 
requiring study drug interruption or discontinuation as specified in Study Calendar & Evaluations.   
 
Subjects discontinued from the treatment phase of the study for any reason will be evaluated 30 days (± 
7) after the last dose of protocol therapy. 
6.1 
Dose Delays/Dose Modifications 
Nivolumab and/or ipilimumab will be withheld for drug-related: Grade 4 hematologic toxicities, non-
hematological toxicity ≥ Grade 3 including laboratory abnormalities, and severe or life-threatening AEs 
as per the table below.  Protocol therapy will also be held for some persistent grade 2 toxicities (please 
see table below).  
 
There are no dose reductions for either nivolumab or ipilimumab.  For toxicity as outlined in this 
protocol, study therapy should be delayed until the adverse event improves to the stated level or should 
be discontinued permanently depending on severity (see table below and section 5.4).  
 
Dose modification guidelines for drug-related adverse events 
Toxicity 
Hold Treatment For 
Timing for Restarting 
Treatment 
Discontinue Subject 
Diarrhea/Colitis 
Grade 2-3 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 
0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Grade 4 
Permanently discontinue
Permanently discontinue
Pneumonitis 
Grade 2 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 
0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Grade 3-4 
Permanently discontinue
Permanently discontinue
Hepatitis 
≥ Grade 2 if subject has 
baseline AST, ALT or total 
bilirubin that is within 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 30 of 80 
Toxicity 
Hold Treatment For 
Timing for Restarting 
Treatment 
Discontinue Subject 
normal limits; ≥ Grade 3 if 
subject has baseline AST, 
ALT or total bilirubin 
within the Grade 1 toxicity 
range  
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
AST or ALT > 8 x ULN 
OR total bilirubin >5 x 
ULN OR concurrent AST 
or ALT > 3 x ULN and total 
bilirubin > 2 x ULN 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
Type I diabetes 
mellitus [TIDM] 
(if new onset) or 
Hyperglycemia 
New onset T1DM or Grade 
3 hyperglycemia 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 even if requires 
physiologic hormone 
replacement 
Resume nivolumab or 
ipilimumab when subjects are 
clinically and metabolically 
stable. 
Grade 4 
May need to permanently 
discontinue; see footnote 
#4
May need to permanently 
discontinue; see footnote #4 
Hypophysitis 
Grade 2-3 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Grade 4 
Permanently discontinue
Permanently discontinue
Nephritis and 
Renal Dysfunction 
Serum creatinine more than 
1.5 and up to 6 times the 
upper limit of normal 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Serum creatinine more than 
6 times the upper limit of 
normal 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
Skin 
Grade 3 rash or suspected 
Stevens-Johnson syndrome 
(SJS) or toxic epidermal 
necrolysis (TEN) 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Grade 4 or confirmed SJS 
or TEN 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 31 of 80 
Toxicity 
Hold Treatment For 
Timing for Restarting 
Treatment 
Discontinue Subject 
Encephalitis 
New-onset moderate or 
severe neurologic signs or 
symptoms 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Immune-mediated 
encephalitis 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
Adrenal 
Insufficiency  
Grade 2 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 even if requires 
physiologic hormone 
replacement
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 12 weeks of last dose. 
Grade 3-4 
May need to permanently 
discontinue; see footnote 
#4
May need to permanently 
discontinue; see footnote #4 
Uveitis1 
≥Grade 2 
Permanently discontinue
Permanently discontinue
Thrombocytopenia 
Grade 3 >7 days or 
associated with bleeding or 
Grade 4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
All Other Drug-
Related Toxicity 
Grade 22 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 even if requires 
physiologic hormone 
replacement for drug 
related endocrinopathy 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Grade 3 or severe3 
Toxicity resolves to 
Grade 0-1 even if requires 
physiologic hormone 
replacement for drug 
related endocrinopathy 
Toxicity does not resolve 
within 6 weeks of last dose 
unless delay beyond 6 weeks 
allows for prolonged steroid 
taper to manage toxicity. In 
such cases, the Sponsor 
Investigator must be consulted 
prior to re-initiating treatment.
Grade 44 
Permanently discontinue
Permanently discontinue
1 Uveitis or blurred vision that does not respond to topical therapy and does not improve to Grade 1 severity 
within the re-treatment period OR requires systemic treatment 
2 Exceptions include grade 2 drug-related fatigue or laboratory abnormalities; do not delay for these events.  
3 Exceptions include grade 3 lymphopenia or leukopenia; do not delay for these events. In addition, any Grade 
≥ 3 drug-related amylase or lipase abnormality that is not associated with symptoms or clinical manifestations 
of pancreatitis does not require dose delay. The Investigator should be consulted for such Grade ≥ 3 amylase 
or lipase abnormalities. 
4 The following events do not require discontinuation: 
 
Isolated Grade 4 amylase or lipase abnormalities that are not associated with symptoms or clinical 
manifestations of pancreatitis and decrease to ≤Grade 1 within 6 weeks of onset. If recovery occurs, 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 32 of 80 
Toxicity 
Hold Treatment For 
Timing for Restarting 
Treatment 
Discontinue Subject 
drug(s) may be restarted at the discretion of the treating physician. If asymptomatic grade 2 or greater 
amylase or lipase abnormalities still exists after 6 weeks, the sponsor investigator should be notified and 
patients may be given up to 12 weeks to recover to ≤ Grade 1. Permanently discontinue for any grade 4 
amylase or lipase abnormalities that are associated with symptoms or clinical manifestations of 
pancreatitis that do not decrease to ≤ Grade 3 within 1 week of onset.  
 
Isolated Grade 4 electrolyte imbalances/abnormalities that are not associated with clinical sequelae and 
are corrected with supplementation/appropriate management within 72 hours of their onset 
 
Grade 4 lymphopenia or leucopenia 
 
Grade 4 drug-related endocrinopathy adverse events, such as adrenal insufficiency, ACTH deficiency, 
hyper- or hypothyroidism, or glucose intolerance, which resolve or are adequately controlled with 
physiologic hormone replacement (corticosteroids, thyroid hormones) or glucose-controlling agents, 
respectively, may not require discontinuation after discussion with and approval from the Investigator. 
 
Note: Permanently discontinue for any severe or Grade 3 drug-related AE that recurs or any life-threatening 
event.  
Subjects with intolerable or persistent Grade 2 drug-related AE may hold study medication at physician 
discretion. Permanently discontinue study drug for persistent Grade 2 adverse reactions for which treatment 
with study drug has been held, that do not recover to Grade 0-1 within 12 weeks of the last dose.  
 
In case toxicity does not resolve to Grade 0-1 within 12 weeks after last infusion, trial treatment should 
be discontinued after consultation with BTCRC and the sponsor-investigator. With site investigator and 
sponsor-investigator agreement, subjects with a laboratory adverse event still at Grade 2 after 12 weeks 
may continue treatment in the trial only if asymptomatic and controlled. For information on the 
management of adverse events, see Section 5.3. If a subject has a delay of more than 12 weeks or more 
than 3 delays in study drug dosing due to toxicities they will be discontinued from the trial treatment. 
 
Subjects who experience a recurrence of the same severe or life-threatening event at the same grade or 
greater with re-challenge of nivolumab or ipilimumab should be discontinued from trial treatment.   
 
For subjects on Arm 2 with immune-related adverse events, the assessment for discontinuation of 
ipilimumab should be made separately from the assessment for discontinuation of nivolumab. Although 
there is overlap among the discontinuation criteria, if criteria are met for ipilimumab but not for 
nivolumab, treatment with nivolumab may continue if ipilimumab is discontinued. If a subject meets 
criteria for discontinuation and treating physician is unable to determine whether the event is related to 
nivolumab or ipilimumab, the subject should discontinue both nivolumab and ipilimumab.  
6.2 
Subject Withdrawal/Discontinuation Criteria 
Subjects may withdraw consent at any time for any reason or be withdrawn from the trial at the 
discretion of the site investigator should any untoward effect occur. In addition, a subject may be 
withdrawn by the sponsor-investigator or BTCRC if enrollment into the trial is inappropriate, the trial 
plan is violated, or for administrative and/or other safety reasons. Specific details regarding 
discontinuation or withdrawal are provided below.  
 
A subject must be discontinued from the trial treatment for any of the following reasons: 
 Confirmed radiographic disease progression by RECIST 1.1 criteria 
 Unacceptable adverse experiences as described in Section 5.3 and 11.1 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 33 of 80 
 Intercurrent illness that prevents further administration of treatment 
 Site investigator’s decision to withdraw the subject 
 A female subject has a confirmed positive serum/urine pregnancy test 
 Noncompliance with trial treatment or procedure requirements 
 Completed 6 months of treatment with protocol therapy  
 Subject refuses further treatment 
 If a subject has a treatment delay of more than 12 weeks from last infusion. See section 6.1. 
 
A subject must be discontinued from the trial for any of the following reasons: 
 Administrative reasons  
 The subject or legal representative (such as a parent or legal guardian) withdraws consent. 
 The subject is lost to follow-up 
 
The End of Treatment and Follow-up visit procedures are listed in Section 7 (Study Schedule of Events 
and Visit Requirements). After the end of treatment, each subject will be followed for 100 days for 
adverse event monitoring (serious adverse events will be collected for 100 days after the end of 
treatment as described in Section 12.2.2). Subjects who discontinue for reasons other than progressive 
disease will have post-treatment follow-up for disease status until disease progression, initiating a non-
study cancer treatment, withdrawing consent or becoming lost to follow-up. After documented disease 
progression each subject will be followed for survival for up to 2 years, withdrawal of consent, or the 
end of the study, whichever occurs first. 
 
When a subject discontinues/withdraws prior to trial completion, all applicable activities scheduled for 
the final trial visit should be performed at the time of discontinuation. Any adverse events which are 
present at the time of discontinuation/withdrawal should be followed in accordance with the safety 
requirements outlined in Section 12.2.1 – AE Reporting).  
6.3 
Protocol Discontinuation 
If a subject decides to withdraw from the study (and not just from protocol therapy) all efforts should be 
made to complete the final study assessments. The site study team should contact the subject by 
telephone or through a clinic visit to determine the reason for the study withdrawal. If the reason for 
withdrawal is an adverse event, it will be recorded on the eCRF. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
     
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 34 of 80 
7. 
ARM 1 (NIVOLUMAB): STUDY CALENDAR & EVALUATIONS 
Cycle Length: Arm 1= 28 days
Screening 
On Treatment 
Cycle 1+
Safety Follow up 
Long Term 
Follow up11
-28 d 
-14 d 
Day 1 (±3) 
30 days (±7) 
(±14 days) 
REQUIRED ASSESSMENTS 
Informed Consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
Medical history (inc. NGS results, if done) and Height1
X
Physical examination including vital signs (BP, weight)
X
X
X
ECOG performance status 
X
X
X
AEs & concomitant medications2 
X
X
+30, +100
X
Radiation Treatment Plan Data3 
X 
LABORATORY TESTING 
CBC with differential and platelet count
X
X4
X
Complete Metabolic Profile 
X
X4
X
Direct bilirubin, Mg, Phos 
X
X4
X
Creatinine clearance5 
X
PT/INR and aPTT 
X
Thyroid function (TSH, T3, T4)6 
X
C14, Every odd cycle6
ESR, CRP, vWF Ag and ferritin5 
Pre C1, Pre C2
X5
WOCBP: Serum or Urine pregnancy test, FSH (as needed)7
-7d7
DISEASE ASSESSMENT 
Pathology Report of diagnosis 
X8
CT of chest through adrenals or PET CT9
X10
Q 12 weeks during Tx10 
X11
CT or MRI Brain12 
X
TREATMENT EXPOSURE (Arm1)- treatment window +/- 3 days
Nivolumab 480mg Q4W 
X13
CORRELATIVE STUDIES 
Mandatory Unstained Slides for Analyses, if available14
X
Mandatory Whole Blood for Somatic Baseline
Pre C1
Mandatory Blood, Serum, and Plasma for Analyses15
Pre C1, Pre C2
X
Optional Bronchoalveolar Lavage16 
X16
BANKING SAMPLES 
Optional Whole Blood17 
Pre C1, Pre C2
X
Optional Unstained Slides18 
X
Optional Serum and Plasma19 
Pre C1, Pre C2
X
FOLLOW-UP 
Progression and survival11 
X
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
     
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 35 of 80 
Arm 1- Key to Footnotes  
1. 
Medical history to include demographics, trial awareness question, smoking history, prior treatments, radiation and surgical history. Smoking history to 
include: amount, frequency, start and stop dates of cigarette, cigar and pipe usage. If subject has prior genetic sequencing analyses results available, those 
results should be submitted by end of Cycle 1. 
2. 
Treatment-related adverse events will be followed until resolution, return to baseline, or deemed clinically insignificant. Adverse events (from time of 
consent) and concomitant medications (28 days prior to start of protocol treatment) should be assessed and recorded until 100 days after last dose of study 
drug.  SAE’s and the conmeds used to treat them will be collected up to 100 days post treatment.   
3. 
Collection of radiation treatment plan data can take place any time during the study. Data such as total lung volume, V20, and additional radiation 
parameters will be collected. See Documents/Info tab of the EDC. This data will be recorded in the database for future analysis, but it will not affect 
treatment while on study and is not required to be collected prior to enrollment or initiation of treatment. 
4. 
C1D1 testing does not need to be repeated if performed within 7 days of starting protocol therapy. 
5. 
Measured or calculated creatinine clearance (GFR can also be used in place of creatinine or CrCl). Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR); C-Reactive 
Protein (CRP); von Willebrand Factor antigen (vWF Ag). Collect ESR, CRP, vWF and ferritin pre-treatment on C1D1, C2D1 and either at the End of 
Treatment or if the subject develops any grade 3-4 pneumonitis. 
6. 
Thyroid function testing: Perform TSH, T3, T4 at baseline and at odd cycles starting at cycle 3 (i.e. Q 8 wks). T3, T4: free/ total as per local standards. 
7. 
For women of childbearing potential. Must have negative pregnancy test within 7 days of registration. Women < 62 yrs old must have FSH > 40 mIU/mL 
to be considered post-menopausal. 
8. 
A pathology report confirming the diagnosis of NSCLC must be obtained and reviewed by the treating physician prior to registration to study.  
9. 
All patients require Chest CT through adrenals or PET-CT at the time of screening and at subsequent imaging time points.  Abdomen or pelvic CTs or 
bone scans can be included at the discretion of the treating physician should it be clinically indicated, but these are not mandatory. 
10. 
Screening scan including at least CT portion of the chest and abdomen must be performed within 56 days after the completion of chemoradiation or 
consolidation. PET CT may be done in place of regular CT scans at the discretion of the site investigator.  Baseline scans should be done within 28 days 
prior to treatment initiation. Radiographic disease assessment will be done every 12 weeks ± 4 weeks during study treatment. The scan interval may be 
reset if scans were done early for clinical reasons. See also 8.3. 
11. 
After completion of protocol therapy, subjects who discontinue for reasons other than progressive disease will have post-treatment follow-up for disease 
status until disease progression, initiating a non-study cancer treatment, withdrawing consent or becoming lost to follow-up. Post treatment radiographic 
disease assessment should be performed every 3 months until progression. After documented disease progression each subject will be followed for survival 
every 3 months for up to 2 years, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study (whichever occurs first).  
12. 
A head MRI or CT should be done prior to study treatment for subjects that are symptomatic or have not had prior brain imaging. 
13. 
For subjects who meet all eligibility criteria and have recovered sufficiently from treatment with chemoradiation, initial consolidation therapy with 
nivolumab will be started within 56 days after chemoradiation is complete. For subjects who meet all eligibility criteria after completion of up to two 
consolidation chemotherapy treatments, therapy with nivolumab will be started within 56 days after last cycle of chemotherapy.   
14. 
Mandatory submission of unstained slides from an archived tumor block (if available) for PD-L1, CD4, CD8 by IHC. In addition, whole exome 
sequencing, RNA sequencing, methylation analysis will be performed.  See Correlative Laboratory Manual (CLM) for collection, labeling and shipping 
instructions.   
15. 
Mandatory blood samples for correlative testing should be drawn pre-treatment on C1D1, C2D1 and either at the End of Treatment Visit or if the subject 
develops any grade 3-4 pneumonitis. See CLM for collection, labeling, and shipping instructions. 
16. 
If subject has a bronchoscopy with BAL for clinical reasons, please collect a portion of the of BAL fluid for correlative analysis (optional). 
17. 
Optional submission of whole blood for banking is to be collected at Pre-Treatment C1D1, C2D1, and End of Treatment Visit. See CLM for collection, 
processing, labeling and shipping instructions. 
18. 
Optional submission of unstained slides for banking from an archived FFPE tumor block is requested. See CLM for collection, labeling, and shipping 
instructions. 
19. 
Optional submission of serum and plasma for banking are to be collected at Pre-Treatment C1D1, C2D1, and End of Treatment Visit. See CLM for 
collection, labeling, processing, and shipping instructions. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
     
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 36 of 80 
8. 
ARM 2 (NIVOLUMAB + IPILIMUMAB): STUDY CALENDAR & EVALUATIONS 
Cycle Length: Arm 2= 42 days
Screening 
On Treatment  
Cycle 1+ (±3)
Safety  
Follow up
Long Term 
Follow up11
-28 d 
-14 d 
Day 1 
Day 1511 
Day 2911 
30 days (±7) 
(±14 days) 
REQUIRED ASSESSMENTS 
Informed Consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical history (inc. NGS results, if done) and Height1
X
Physical examination including vital signs (BP, weight)
X
X
X
X
X
ECOG performance status 
X
X
X
X
X
AEs & concomitant medications2 
X
X
X
X
+30, +100
X
Radiation Treatment Plan Data3 
X 
LABORATORY TESTING 
CBC with differential and platelet count
X
X4
X
X
X
Complete Metabolic Profile 
X
X4
X
X
X
Direct bilirubin, Mg, Phos 
X
X4
X
Creatinine clearance5 
X
PT/INR and aPTT 
X
Thyroid function (TSH, T3, T4)6 
X
X4
ESR, CRP, vWF Ag and ferritin5 
preC1,C2 
X5
WOCBP: Serum or Urine pregnancy test, FSH (as needed)7
-7d7
DISEASE ASSESSMENT 
Pathology Report of diagnosis 
X8
CT of chest through adrenals or PET CT9
X10
Q 12 weeks during treatment10  
X11
CT or MRI Brain12 
X
TREATMENT EXPOSURE (Arm2)- treatment window +/- 3 days 
Nivolumab 240mg Q2W 
X13
X
X
Ipilimumab 1mg/kg Q6W 
X13
CORRELATIVE STUDIES 
Mandatory Unstained Slides for Analyses, if available14
X
Mandatory Whole Blood for Somatic Baseline
Pre C1 
Mandatory Blood, Serum, and Plasma for Analyses15
preC1,C2 
X
Optional Bronchoalveolar Lavage16 
X
X14
BANKING SAMPLES 
Optional Whole Blood17 
preC1,C2 
X
Optional Unstained Slides18 
X
Optional Serum and Plasma19 
preC1,C2 
X
FOLLOW-UP 
Progression and survival11 
X
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
     
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 37 of 80 
Arm 2- Key to Footnotes  
1. 
Medical history to include include demographics, trial awareness question, smoking history, prior treatments, radiation and surgical history. Smoking 
history to include: amount, frequency, start and stop dates of cigarette, cigar and pipe usage. If subject has prior genetic sequencing analyses results 
available, those results should be submitted by end of Cycle 1. 
2. 
Treatment-related adverse events will be followed until resolution, return to baseline, or deemed clinically insignificant. Adverse events (from time of 
consent) and concomitant medications (28 days prior to start of protocol treatment) should be assessed and recorded until 100 days after last dose of study 
drug.  SAE’s and the conmeds used to treat them will be collected up to 100 days post treatment. See Section 8.5.  
3. 
Collection of radiation treatment plan data can take place any time during the study. Data such as total lung volume, V20, and additional radiation 
parameters will be collected. See Documents/Info tab of the EDC. This data will be recorded in the database for future analysis, but it will not affect 
treatment while on study and is not required to be collected prior to enrollment or initiation of treatment. 
4. 
C1D1 testing does not need to be repeated if performed within 7 days of starting protocol therapy. 
5. 
Measured or calculated creatinine clearance (GFR can also be used in place of creatinine or CrCl). Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR); C-Reactive 
Protein (CRP); von Willebrand Factor antigen (vWF Ag). Collect ESR, CRP, vWF and ferritin pre-treatment on C1D1, C2D1 and either at the End of 
Treatment or if the subject develops any grade 3-4 pneumonitis. 
6. 
Thyroid function testing: Perform TSH, T3, T4 at baseline and on Day 1 of each cycle (i.e. every 6 weeks). T3, T4: free/ total as per local standards. 
7. 
For women of childbearing potential. Must have negative pregnancy test within 7 days of registration. Women < 62 yrs old must have FSH > 40 mIU/mL 
to be considered post-menopausal. 
8. 
A pathology report confirming the diagnosis of NSCLC must be obtained and reviewed by the treating physician prior to registration to study.  
9. 
All patients require Chest CT through adrenals or PET-CT at the time of screening and at subsequent imaging time points.  Abdomen or pelvic CTs or 
bone scans can be included at the discretion of the treating physician should it be clinically indicated, but these are not mandatory. 
10. 
Screening scan including at least CT portion of the chest and abdomen must be performed within 56 days after the completion of chemoradiation. PET CT 
may be done in place of regular CT scans at the discretion of the site investigator.  Baseline scans should be done within 28 days prior to treatment 
initiation. Radiographic disease assessment will be done every 12 weeks  ±4 weeks during study treatment. The scan interval may be reset if scans were 
done early for clinical reasons. See also 8.3. 
11. 
After completion of protocol therapy, subjects who discontinue for reasons other than progressive disease will have post-treatment follow-up for disease 
status until disease progression, initiating a non-study cancer treatment, withdrawing consent or becoming lost to follow-up. Post treatment radiographic 
disease assessment should be performed every 3 months until progression. After documented disease progression each subject will be followed for 
survival every 3 months for up to 2 years, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study (whichever occurs first).   
12. 
A head MRI or CT should be done prior to study treatment for subjects that are symptomatic or have not had prior brain imaging. 
13. 
For subjects who meet all eligibility criteria and have recovered sufficiently from treatment with chemoradiation, initial consolidation therapy with 
nivolumab and ipilimumab will be started within 56 days after chemoradiation is complete. For subjects who meet all eligibility criteria after completion 
of up to two consolidation chemotherapy treatments, therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab will be started within 56 days after last cycle of 
chemotherapy.  
14. 
Mandatory submission of unstained slides from an archived tumor block (if available) for PD-L1, CD4, CD8 by IHC. In addition, whole exome 
sequencing, RNA sequencing, methylation analysis will be performed.  See CLM for collection, labeling and shipping instructions.   
15. 
Mandatory blood samples for correlative testing should be drawn pre-treatment on C1D1, C2D1, and either at the End of Treatment Visit or if the subject 
develops any grade 3-4 pneumonitis. See CLM for collection, labeling, and shipping instructions. 
16. 
If subject has a bronchoscopy with BAL for clinical reasons, please collect a portion of BAL fluid for correlative analysis (optional).  
17. 
Optional submission of whole blood for banking is to be collected at Pre-Treatment C1D1, C2D1, and End of Treatment Visit. See CLM for collection, 
processing, labeling and shipping instructions. 
18. 
Optional submission of unstained slides for banking from an archived FFPE tumor block is requested. See CLM for collection, labeling, and shipping 
instructions. 
19. 
Optional submission of serum and plasma for banking are to be collected at Pre-Treatment C1D1, C2D1, and End of Treatment Visit. See CLM for 
collection, labeling, processing, and shipping instructions.  

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 38 of 80 
8.1 
Screening Evaluations 
8.1.1 Within 28 days prior to registration for protocol therapy 
 Informed consent 
 Pathology Report Confirmation. A pathology report confirming the diagnosis of NSCLC must be 
obtained and reviewed by the treating physician prior to registration to the study.   
 Radiology Imaging: A CT of the chest and abdomen will be done within 56 days after 
chemoradiation. This imaging will be done within 28 days of treatment initiation on study.  A 
PET CT may be done instead of regular CT scans.  A head MRI or CT should be done for 
subjects that are symptomatic or have not had prior brain imaging of study treatment. 
 Mandatory submission of unstained slides from an archived tumor block for correlative analysis, 
if available. New biopsy is not required if archival tissue is not available. Tissue should be 
identified and requested before registration; submission to BTCRC AHQ will occur after subject 
is successfully registered. Analysis will include PD-L1 and other IHC, and genetic analyses. 
 Optional submission of unstained slides from an archived tumor block for banking, with consent. 
Tissue should be identified and requested before registration; submission to BTCRC AHQ will 
occur after subject is successfully registered.  
 Collection of radiation treatment plan data can take place any time during the study. Data such as 
total lung volume, V20, and additional radiation parameters will be collected. See 
Documents/Info tab of the EDC. This data will be recorded in the database for future analysis, 
but it will not affect treatment while on study and is not required prior to enrollment or initiation 
of treatment. 
8.1.2 Within 14 days prior to registration for protocol therapy 
 Medical History. Medical history to include demographics, trial awareness question, smoking 
history, prior treatments, radiation and surgical history. Smoking history to include: amount, 
frequency, start and stop dates of cigarette, cigar and pipe usage. If subject has prior genetic 
sequencing analyses results available, those results should be submitted by end of Cycle 1. 
 Height 
 Physical examination including vital signs (blood pressure, weight) 
 ECOG performance status  
 Complete Metabolic Profile to include Na, K, Cl, CO2, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin, alk 
phos, AST, ALT, serum creatinine, BUN, calcium, and glucose.  Direct bilirubin, Mg and Phos 
will also be drawn. Please see Section 3.1.8 for additional information regarding serum 
creatinine, calculated creatinine clearance and GFR values. 
 Complete Blood Count with differential to include absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelets 
and hemoglobin 
 PT/INR and aPTT 
 Thyroid function (TSH, T3, T4); T3, T4: free/ total as per local standards. 
 Within 7 days: Serum or urine pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. Women < 62 
yrs old must have FSH > 40 mIU/mL to be considered post-menopausal. 
 Adverse events and concomitant medications.   

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 39 of 80 
8.2 
On Treatment Evaluations 
8.2.1 Treatment Arm 1 (cycle length = 28 days) 
8.2.1.1 Day 1 of each cycle  
 Physical examination including vital signs (blood pressure, weight) 
 ECOG performance status 
 Complete Metabolic Profile to include Na, K, Cl, CO2, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin, alk 
phos, AST, ALT, creatinine, BUN, calcium, and glucose. Direct bilirubin, Mg and Phos will also 
be drawn. (For C1D1 do not repeat if screening CMP is within 7 days of starting protocol 
therapy) 
 Complete Blood Count with differential to include absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet and 
hemoglobin (For C1D1 do not repeat if screening CBC is within 7 days of starting protocol 
therapy). 
 Thyroid function (TSH, T3, T4) (For C1D1 do not repeat if screening testing is within 7 days of 
starting protocol therapy). T3, T4: free/ total as per local standards. 
 ESR, CRP, vWF Ag and ferritin: pre-treatment C1D1 and C2D1 
 Adverse events and concomitant medications.   
 Nivolumab 480 mg IV  
 Blood samples for correlative testing will be drawn at pre-treatment C1D1 and C2D1. 
8.2.1.2 Odd numbered cycles starting at Cycle 3 
 Thyroid function (TSH, T3, T4) (For C1D1 do not repeat if screening testing is within 7 days of 
starting protocol therapy). T3, T4: free/ total as per local standards. 
 
8.2.2 Treatment Arm 2 (cycle length = 42 days) 
8.2.2.1 Day 1 of each cycle 
 Physical examination including vital signs (blood pressure, weight) 
 ECOG performance status 
 Complete Metabolic Profile to include Na, K, Cl, CO2, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin, alk 
phos, AST, ALT, creatinine, BUN, calcium and glucose. Direct bilirubin, Mg and Phos will also 
be drawn. (For C1D1 do not repeat if screening CMP is within 7 days of starting protocol 
therapy) 
 Complete Blood Count with differential to include absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet and 
hemoglobin (For C1D1 do not repeat if screening CBC is within 7 days of starting protocol 
therapy). 
 Thyroid function (TSH, T3, T4) (For C1D1 do not repeat if screening testing is within 7 days of 
starting protocol therapy). T3, T4: free/ total as per local standards. 
 ESR, CRP, vWF Ag and ferritin: pre-treatment C1D1 and C2D1 
 Adverse events and concomitant medications.   
 Nivolumab 240mg IV  
 Ipilimumab 1mg/kg IV 
 Blood samples for correlative testing will be drawn at pre-treatment C1D1 and C2D1. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 40 of 80 
8.2.2.2 Day 15 and 29 of each cycle 
 Physical examination including vital signs (blood pressure, weight) 
 ECOG performance status 
 Complete Metabolic Profile  
 Complete Blood Count with differential  
 Adverse events and concomitant medications.   
 Nivolumab 240mg IV  
8.3 
Imaging while on treatment 
All patients are required to have either chest and abdomen CTs or PET/CT as part of their initial 
screening imaging.  Following initiation of treatment, patients should undergo repeat imaging every 12 
weeks while on treatment. However, the scan interval may be reset if scans were done sooner for clinical 
reasons. This imaging should include at least chest CT or PET/CT (per discretion of treating physician) 
and should include abdomen CT if clinically indicated.  If not clinically indicated, abdomen CT does not 
have to be done at each imaging time point. Imaging may be done locally. The window for imaging 
while on treatment is ±4 weeks.  
8.4 
Safety Follow-up Evaluations 
A safety follow-up visit should occur when subjects permanently stop study treatment for whatever 
reason (toxicity, progression, or at discretion of site investigator) and should be performed 30 days (±7 
days) after the last dose of treatment. Subjects who have an ongoing ≥ grade 2 or serious AE (SAE) at 
this visit will continue to be followed until the AE resolves to ≤ Grade 1 or baseline, is deemed clinically 
insignificant, and/or until a new anti-cancer treatment starts, whichever is earlier. 
 Physical examination including vital signs (blood pressure, weight) 
 ECOG performance status 
 Complete Metabolic Profile  
 Complete Blood Count with differential 
 ESR, CRP, vWF Ag and ferritin 
 Adverse events, and concomitant medications must be assessed. Treatment-related adverse 
events will be followed until resolution, return to baseline, or deemed clinically insignificant. 
Adverse events (from time of consent) and concomitant medications (28 days prior to start of 
protocol treatment) should be assessed and recorded until 100 days after last dose of study drug.  
SAE’s and the conmeds used to treat them will be collected up to 100 days post treatment. See 
Section 8.5 below. 
 Mandatory blood samples for correlative testing and optional samples for banking will be drawn 
8.5 
Long Term Follow-up Evaluations 
After completion of protocol therapy, subjects who discontinue for reasons other than progressive 
disease will have post-treatment follow-up for disease status until disease progression, initiating a non-
study cancer treatment, withdrawing consent or becoming lost to follow-up. After documented disease 
progression each subject will be followed for survival every 3 months (± 4 weeks) for up to 2 years, 
withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study (whichever occurs first). 
 Treatment-related adverse events will be followed until resolution, return to baseline, or deemed 
clinically insignificant. Adverse events (from time of consent) and concomitant medications (28 
days prior to start of protocol treatment) should be assessed and recorded until 100 days after last 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 41 of 80 
dose of study drug or until a new anti-cancer treatment starts, whichever is earlier.  SAE’s and 
the conmeds used to treat them will be collected up to 100 days post treatment. 
 For subjects who discontinue for reasons other than progressive disease, radiographic disease 
assessment should be performed every 3 months for up to 2 years until progression, initiating a 
non-study cancer treatment, withdrawing consent or becoming lost to follow-up. The scan 
interval may be reset if scans were done sooner for clinical reasons. PET CT may be done in 
place of regular CT scans at the discretion of the site investigator.  This imaging may be done 
locally.  Once patients are off treatment and on follow-up, the window for imaging is ±4 weeks.  
 
9. 
BIOSPECIMEN STUDIES AND PROCEDURES 
For tumor specimens or blood collected in the protocol, please see the Correlative Laboratory Manual 
(CLM) for additional information regarding collection, labeling and shipping. 
9.1 
Mandatory Unstained Slides for Analysis1 
Mandatory submission of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tumor tissue block for biomarker 
evaluation are requested if available. A new biopsy is not required if archival tissue is not available. 
Tissue should be identified and requested before registration; submission to BTCRC AHQ will occur 
after subject is successfully registered.These biopsy samples should be from current diagnosis and 
should be excisional, incisional, punch or core needle. Fine needle aspirate samples should be collected 
via a needle of 18 gauges or larger or be collected per institutional guidelines. Samples should be 
evaluated for tumor cell quantity (i.e. >100 tumor cells) to allow for adequate PD-L1 
immunohistochemistry analyses. Sample requirement is FFPE block or unstained slides. Please see 
CLM for sample specifications. 
 
Specimens will be submitted for immune marker analyses, including PD-L1.  
 If subject has prior PD-L1 results, the results will be sent at the time of other tissue submission. PD-
L1 testing will not be repeated if one of the following testing platforms were used: Merck (Dako 
22C3), BMS (Dako 28-8) or AstraZeneca (Ventana SP263). Submitted tissue will then be re-
prioritized for use in other biomarker analyses.1 
 If prior PD-L1 testing was not performed or an acceptable platform was not used, PD-L1 
immunohistochemistry (IHC) will be assessed centrally using the PD-L1 28-8 FDA (OPDIVO) kit. 
PD-L1 stained tissue sections will be assessed by a pathologist at Neogenomics and scored as PD-L1 
positive if membrane staining is observed, with a minimum requirement of 100 evaluable tumor 
cells.  
 
Additional IHC such as (but not limited to) CD4, CD8 to be performed by Neogenomics.   
 
In addition, tissue will be dissected and nucleic acids extracted for genetic analyses. Genetic analyses to 
be performed may include CAPP-Seq, Whole Exome Sequencing, RNA-seq, and DNA methylation 
analyses. 
 
1: Tissue prioritization: PD-L1 is first priority. If sufficient tissue remains then CD8, followed by CD4. 
If sufficient tissue is still available then genetic sequencing, and finally methylome analyses. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 42 of 80 
9.2 
Mandatory Whole Blood Collection for Somatic Baseline 
Whole blood samples will be collected prior to C1D1 treatment.  
9.3 
Mandatory Serum Collection for Proteomic Profiling, Cytokine Analyses, and Signature 
Protein Analyses 
Serum specimens will be submitted prior to C1D1 treatment, prior to C2D1 treatment, and at time of 
pneumonitis or at End of Treatment Visit. 
9.3.1 Proteomic Profiling  
This initial proteomics study by the Purdue Proteomics Facility will focus on profiling experiments to 
identify proteins that are differentially expressed (up- or down-regulation and newly synthesized) under 
each treatment condition. At the end of this discovery phase proteomics, we expect to discover a number 
of proteins as putative biomarkers. 
 
Samples will be initially depleted for high abundant albumin and immunoglobulin using Pierce Top 2 
Abundant Protein Depletion Spin Columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and evaluated via 1D SDS-PAGE 
gels. Proteins in the depleted samples will be denatured and quantified by BCA assay. After reduction 
and alkylation, urea concentration will be adjusted with ammonium bicarbonate buffer. Proteins will be 
digested with trypsin/LysC mix and the resulting peptides will be cleaned using Pierce C18 spin 
columns (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) and peptide concentration will be determined by BCA 
assay again.  
Data will be collected in a new Q-Exactive Orbitrap HF mass spectrometer coupled with UltiMate 3000 
nano LC system at the Purdue Proteomics Facility using 2h LC gradient. LC-MS/MS data will be 
searched using a MaxQuant search tool for protein identification and relative quantitation. Search results 
will be filtered at 1% false discovery rate (FDR) both at the peptide and protein levels. Identified 
peptides and proteins will be quantified using precursor ion (MS1) intensity-based label free 
quantitation. The MS1 results will be validated by comparing with the spectral counts results.    
The results will be further analyzed using bioinformatic and computational pipeline of the Purdue core 
facility to identify proteins that are significantly different. Proteins will be subjected to pathway and 
network analyses to determine if any specific metabolic pathway is activated or inhibited due to the 
disease and the treatment conditions. The proteomics results will be complemented with other 
physiological, biochemical, molecular, and treatment data for correlative analysis. 
 
Protein functions are controlled by post-translational modifications (PTMs) and protein-protein 
interactions. Future study will focus on characterizing the changes in the modifications of the identified 
marker proteins, and also focus on how the disease and the treatments affects the oligomerization state 
of these proteins. In addition, future work would include targeted proteomic analysis using Multiple 
Reaction Monitoring (MRM) assays for absolute quantitation of the marker proteins. These studies are 
critical for developing these proteins as therapeutic targets. Purdue Proteomics Facility has the resources 
and capability to carry out these studies, and will lead these efforts. 
9.3.2 Lipidomic Profiling 
The Metabolite Profiling Facility at Bindley Bioscience Center (Purdue University) will apply a recently 
developed mass spectrometry approach for accelerated biomarker discovery named multiple reaction 
monitoring (MRM)-profiling, which is based on the direct injection (no chromatographic separation) of 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 43 of 80 
diluted lipid and metabolite extracts. By this method, molecules are first detected for each experimental 
group base on chemical functional groups. In a second step, individual samples are screened for all the 
molecules detected using a scan mode (MRM) that is very fast and sensitive, resulting in few minutes 
(15min) of data acquisition for each sample. Statistical analysis will be used to isolate a panel of 
molecules related to patient response to the treatment. Additional experiments may be necessary to 
confirm the molecular structure of the informative molecules. Researchers expect that the analysis of 
these two relevant samples sets by MRM-profiling will be a valuable proof-of-concept for this method 
as a biomarker-enrichment approach to be added to clinical trials for identifying cohorts of patients who 
have best changes of benefiting from specific therapies, supporting medical decisions and improving 
therapeutic success. 
 
MRM-profiling is a two-step strategy for small molecule biomarker identification developed from R. 
Graham Cooks and Christina Ferreira (35) (Figure 1). 
 
 
Figure 1. MRM-profiling a 2-Step Method. In the first step (discovery) only one representative sample of each experimental 
group, such as a pooled sample, is interrogated. In the second screening step of MRM-profiling, the entire sample set is 
interrogated but only for ion pairs (MRMs) detected in the discovery step. MRM measurements are extremely fast and their 
profiles are used for statistical differentiation of the sample types. In other words, the samples are individually interrogated 
only for the ion pairs that the representative samples have shown to be characteristic of each class.  
 
Treatment outcome will be initially accessed by multivariate (principle component analyses) statistics 
using MetaboAnalyst 3.0. The performance of the identified metabolites in discriminating treatment 
outcome will also be evaluated by constructing receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) on the 
dataset, and estimating the area under the curve (AUC). 
9.3.3 Cytokine Analysis 
Serum samples will be analyzed for cytokines. 
 
Analyses will include assessment of pre- and post-treatment serum cytokine markers of interest, such as 
(but not limited to) Interferon gamma, Interleukin-10, Interleukin-18, Interleukin-2, Interleukin-4, 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 44 of 80 
Interleukin-6, Interleukin-8, Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1 beta, Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha, 
Tumor Necrosis Factor beta.  
9.3.4 Signature Protein Analyses 
Serum samples will be analyzed for signature diagnostic detection for NSCLC by Dr. Cong Yan at 
Indiana University Simon Cancer Center. 
 
Clinically, it is difficult to use only one biomarker for lung cancer detection.  First, lung cancers are 
heterogeneous diseases and caused by multiple factors, a particular biomarker may or may not be up-
regulated in a given patient.  Second, different inflammation-associated diseases may produce 
overlapping biomarkers. In either case, a panel of multiple biomarkers should be used for more accurate 
lung cancer detection and classification.  Thirteen distinctive serum biomarkers identified in the 
laboratories at Indiana University Simon Cancer Center represent a solution and signature for lung 
cancer diagnosis and prognosis.  
 
The expression level of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) is up-regulated in 
human lung cancers. In Dr. Cong Yan’s lab, persistent activation of Stat3 in lung epithelial cells induced 
inflammation and lung adenocarcinoma sequentially in lung cancer CCSP-rtTA/(tetO)7Stat3C mouse 
model. Multiple Stat3 downstream genes (>800, 2 fold change, p<0.05) have been identified by 
Affymetrix GeneChip microarray analysis using this lung cancer model. From this gene list, they have 
successfully identified more than 13 secretory proteins that serve as biomarkers for NSCLC screen in 
the human serum without biopsy. The expression levels of 13 secretory proteins can be measured by 
ELISA (or multiplex assay system) with specific antibodies.  It is easy and accurate for NSCLC 
detection.  
9.4 
Mandatory Plasma Collection for microRNA Analyses  
Plasma specimens will be submitted prior to C1D1 treatment and prior to C2D1 treatment for 
microRNA analyses.   
 
Dr. Lautenschlaeger’s laboratory at Indiana University School of Medicine or an outside vendor will 
perform the microRNA analyses.  miRNA will be isolated from plasma samples and reverse transcribed 
prior to quantitative PCR analyses using Exiqon’s Serum/Plasma focus panel.   
9.5 
Mandatory Whole Blood Collection for Flow Cytometry  
Whole blood specimens will be submitted prior to C1D1 treatment, prior to C2D1 treatment, and at time 
of pneumonitis or at End of Treatment Visit. 
 
Flow cytometry will be performed at the Purdue Flow Cytometry Core Facility under the direction of 
Dr. Timothy Ratliff.  Analyses will be performed on a 5 laser, 18 color Becton Dickinson Fortessa flow 
cytometry analyzer suitable for analyzing expression on human peripheral blood cells stained with 
fluorochrome tagged antibodies such as, but not limited to, CTLA-4 and CD28. 
9.6 
Optional Bronchoalveolar Lavage 
For subjects undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for clinical reasons, the primary fluid collection 
will be used for routine clinical analysis per the treating physician.  If feasible, please collect a portion of 
the BAL fluid for correlative analysis.  

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 45 of 80 
 
Dr. Homer Twigg’s laboratory at Indiana University School of Medicine will perform the BAL analysis. 
The BAL correlative analysis will include the following such as:  
 cellular count and differential  
 lymphocyte phenotyping (CD3, CD4, CD8)  
 activation markers (CD38, HLA DR) 
 Th1 cytokines (IFNgamma, TNF, IL-6) 
 Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-10) 
 chemokine panel assessment of recruitment cells (MCP-1, IP-10, MIG, RANTES, IL-8).  
If available, leftover sample will be saved as cells and acellular fluid for future studies.  
9.7 
Storage of Biospecimens 
Any remaining correlative specimens will be stored for future research after protocol described 
biospecimen-based studies are completed. 
9.8 
Optional Banking Samples for future studies 
Subject consent will be obtained for additional samples collected for future Big Ten Cancer Research 
Consortium studies. Hoosier Cancer Research Network, as Administrative Headquarters for the BTCRC, 
will manage the banked samples. Samples will be banked indefinitely in the Hoosier Cancer Research 
Network Biorepository.  
 
This includes: 
 Pre- and Post-treatment whole blood: Whole blood will be collected prior to treatment on Cycle 1 Day 
1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and at the 30-day Safety Follow-up visit.  
 Pre- and Post-treatment plasma: Whole blood for plasma will be collected prior to treatment on Cycle 
1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and at the 30-day Safety Follow-up visit.  
 Pre- and Post-treatment serum: Whole blood for serum will be collected prior to treatment on Cycle 1 
Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and at the 30-day Safety Follow-up visit. 
 Unstained slides: Unstained slides will be obtained from the subject’s archived formalin fixed paraffin 
embedded tumor sample.  
 
Please refer to the CLM for all sample collection, processing, labeling, and shipping instructions. 
9.9 
Confidentiality of Biospecimens 
Samples will be identified by a subject’s study number assigned at the time of registration to the trial. 
Any material issued to collaborating researchers will be anonymized and only identified by the subject’s 
study number. 
 
10. 
CRITERIA FOR DISEASE EVALUATION 
10.1 
Measurable Disease 
Measurable disease is defined as the presence of at least one measurable lesion. Measurable lesions are 
defined as those that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be 
recorded) as >20 mm by chest x-ray, as >10 mm with CT scan, or >10 mm with calipers by clinical 
exam.  All tumor measurements must be recorded in millimeters (or decimal fractions of centimeters). 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 46 of 80 
10.1.1 Malignant Lymph Nodes 
To be considered pathologically enlarged and measurable, a lymph node must be >15 mm in short axis 
when assessed by CT scan (CT scan slice thickness recommended to be no greater than 5 mm).  At 
baseline and in follow-up, only the short axis will be measured and followed. 
10.2 
Non-measurable Lesions 
All other lesions (or sites of disease), including small lesions (longest diameter <10 mm or pathological 
lymph nodes with ≥ 10 to <15 mm short axis), are considered non-measurable disease.  Bone lesions, 
leptomeningeal disease, ascites, pleural/pericardial effusions, lymphangitis cutis/pulmonitis, 
inflammatory breast disease, and abdominal masses (not followed by CT or MRI), are considered as 
non-measurable. 
 
NOTE:  Cystic lesions that meet the criteria for radiographically defined simple cysts should not be 
considered as malignant lesions (neither measurable nor non-measurable) since they are, by definition, 
simple cysts. ‘Cystic lesions’ thought to represent cystic metastases can be considered as measurable 
lesions, if they meet the definition of measurability described above. However, if non-cystic lesions are 
present in the same subject, these are preferred for selection as target lesions. 
10.3 
Target Lesions 
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total, representative of 
all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions and recorded and measured at baseline.  Target 
lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter), be representative 
of all involved organs, but in addition should be those that lend themselves to reproducible repeated 
measurements.  It may be the case that, on occasion, the largest lesion does not lend itself to 
reproducible measurement in which circumstance the next largest lesion which can be measured 
reproducibly should be selected.  A sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesions, short axis for 
nodal lesions) for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the baseline sum diameters.  If 
lymph nodes are to be included in the sum, then only the short axis is added into the sum.  The baseline 
sum diameters will be used as reference to further characterize any objective tumor regression in the 
measurable dimension of the disease. 
10.4 
Non-target Lesions 
All other lesions (or sites of disease) including any measurable lesions over and above the 5 target 
lesions should be identified as non-target lesions and should also be recorded at baseline.  Measurements 
of these lesions are not required, but the presence, absence, or in rare cases unequivocal progression of 
each should be noted throughout follow-up. 
10.5 
Evaluation of Target Lesions 
NOTE: In addition to the information below, also see section 4.3.2 in the international criteria proposed 
by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Committee, version 1.1 (Eur J Cancer 
45;2009:228-247) for special notes on the assessment of target lesions.  
 
Complete 
Response (CR) 
Disappearance of all target lesions.  Any pathological lymph 
nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in 
short axis to <10 mm.

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 47 of 80 
Partial Response 
(PR) 
At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target 
lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters 
Progressive 
Disease (PD) 
At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target 
lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this 
includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study).  In 
addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also 
demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.  (Note:  the 
appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered 
progressions).
Stable Disease 
(SD) 
Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient 
increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum 
diameters while on study
10.6 
Evaluation of Non-target Lesions 
Complete Response (CR) 
Disappearance of all non-target lesions and 
normalization of tumor marker level.  All lymph 
nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm 
short axis) 
 
Note:  If tumor markers are initially above the upper 
normal limit, they must normalize for a subject to be 
considered in complete clinical response. 
Non-CR/ Non-PD 
Persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or 
maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal 
limits
Progressive Disease (PD) 
Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or 
unequivocal progression of existing non-target 
lesions.  Unequivocal progression should not 
normally trump target lesion status.  It must be 
representative of overall disease status change, not a 
single lesion increase.
 
Although a clear progression of “non-target” lesions only is exceptional, the opinion of the site 
investigator should prevail in such circumstances, and the progression status should be confirmed at a 
later time by the sponsor investigator. 
10.7 
Evaluation of Best Overall Response 
 
Target Lesions 
Non-Target Lesions 
New Lesions
Overall 
Response 
CR 
CR 
No 
CR 
CR 
Non-CR/ Non-PD 
No 
PR 
CR 
Not evaluated 
No 
PR 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 48 of 80 
PR 
Non-PD/ or not all 
evaluated 
No 
PR 
SD 
Non-PD or not all evaluated 
No 
SD 
Not all evaluated 
Non-PD 
No 
Non-evaluable 
PD 
Any 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
PD* 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Yes 
PD 
*In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression in non-target lesions may be 
accepted as disease progression.
Subjects with a global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without 
objective evidence of disease progression at that time should be classified as having “symptomatic 
deterioration”.  Every effort should be made to document the objective progression even after 
discontinuation of treatment. 
 
In some circumstances it may be difficult to distinguish residual disease from normal tissue.  When the 
evaluation of complete response depends on this determination, it is recommended that the residual 
lesion be investigated (fine needle aspirate/biopsy) to confirm the complete response status. 
 
10.8 
Definitions for Response Evaluation – RECIST 1.1 
10.8.1 First Documentation of Response 
The time between initiation of therapy and first documentation of PR or CR. 
 
10.8.2 Confirmation of Response 
To be assigned a status of complete or partial response, changes in tumor measurements must be 
confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are 
first met. 
 
10.8.3 Duration of Overall Complete Response 
The period measured from the time that measurement criteria are met for complete response until the 
first date that recurrent disease is objectively documented. 
 
10.8.4 Objective Response Rate  
The objective response rate is the proportion of all subjects with confirmed PR or CR according to 
RECIST 1.1, from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for 
progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the start of treatment). 
 
10.8.5 Time to Progression 
A measurement from the date of randomization until the criteria for disease progression is met as 
defined by RECIST 1.1. Subjects who have not progressed or have died due to any cause will be right-
censored at the date of the last disease evaluation. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 49 of 80 
10.8.6 Progression Free Survival 
A measurement from the date of randomization until the criteria for disease progression is met as 
defined by RECIST 1.1 or death occurs. Subjects who have not progressed will be right-censored at the 
date of the last disease evaluation. 
10.8.7 Time to Metastatic Disease 
From date of randomization until the date of metastatic disease outside of the radiated field.  Subjects 
who have not metastasized will be right censored 
 
10.8.8 Overall Survival 
Overall survival is defined by the date of randomization to date of death from any cause. 
 
11. 
DRUG INFORMATION 
 
11.1 
Nivolumab (Opdivo®) 
11.1.1 Other names and properties  
ONO-4538, MDX-1106, BMS-936558-01 or BMS-936558, anti-PD-1, anti-programmed cell death-1 
monoclonal antibody  
11.1.2 Supplier/How Supplied 
Bristol-Meyers Squibb will supply nivolumab at no charge to subjects participating in this clinical trial. 
 
The site investigator shall take responsibility for and shall take all steps to maintain appropriate records 
and ensure appropriate supply, storage, handling, distribution, and usage of investigational product in 
accordance with the protocol and any applicable laws and regulations. 
11.1.3 Product Description and Dosage Form 
 
Nivolumab Injection, 100 mg/10 mL (10 mg/mL) 
Nivolumab Injection, 100mg/10 mL (10mg/mL) is a clear to opalescent, colorless to pale yellow liquid, 
which may contain light (few) particulates. The drug product is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, single-use, 
isotonic aqueous solution formulated at 10 mg/mL in sodium citrate, sodium chloride, mannitol, 
diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (pentetic acid), and polysorbate 80 (Tween™ 80), pH 6.0 and 
includes an overfill to account for vial, needle, and syringe holdup. It is supplied in 10-cc Type I flint 
glass vials, stoppered with butyl rubber stoppers and sealed with aluminum seals. The only difference 
between the two drug product presentations is the vial fill volume. 
11.1.4 Storage and Stability 
Clinical supplies must be stored in a secure, limited-access location under the storage conditions specified 
on the label. Store nivolumab under refrigeration at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F). Protect nivolumab from 
light by storing in the original package until time of use. Do not freeze or shake. For additional details 
on prepared drug storage and use time of nivolumab under room temperature/light and refrigeration, 
please refer to the BMS-936558 (nivolumab) Investigator Brochure section for “Recommended Storage 
and Use Conditions.” 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 50 of 80 
 
Undiluted Nivolumab Injection and Diluted Nivolumab Injection in the IV Container.  
The administration of nivolumab infusion must be completed within 24 hours of preparation. If not 
used immediately, the infusion solution may be stored under refrigeration conditions (2° to 8°C, 36° to 
46°F) for up to 24 hours, and a maximum of 8 hours of the total 24 hours can be at room temperature 
(20° to 25°C, 68° to 77°F) and room light. The maximum 8-hour period under room temperature and 
room light conditions includes the product administration period. 
 
11.1.5 Handling and Disposal 
Preparation should be performed by trained personnel in accordance with good practices rules, 
especially with respect to asepsis. 
 
After final drug reconciliation, unused nivolumab vials should be disposed at the site following 
procedures for the disposal of anticancer drugs. 
11.1.6 Dispensing 
Nivolumab must be dispensed only from official study sites and to eligible subjects under the 
supervision of the site investigator. Clinical supplies may not be used for any purpose other than that 
stated in the protocol. The site investigator shall take responsibility for and shall take all steps to 
maintain appropriate records and ensure appropriate supply, storage, handling, distribution, and usage 
of investigational product in accordance with the protocol and any applicable laws and regulations. 
11.1.7 Administration 
Nivolumab is to be administered as an IV infusion through a 0.2-micron to 1.2-micron pore size, low-
protein binding polyethersulfone membrane in-line filter at the protocol-specified doses and infusion 
times. It is not to be administered as an IV push or bolus injection. Nivolumab injection can be infused 
undiluted (10 mg/mL) or diluted with 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, 
USP to protein concentrations as low as 0.35 mg/mL. When the dose is fixed (eg, 240mg, 360mg, or 
480mg flat dose), nivolumab injection can be infused undiluted or diluted so as not to exceed a total 
infusion volume of 160 mL. During drug product preparation and handling, vigorous mixing or shaking 
is to be avoided. Care must be taken to assure sterility of the prepared solution as the product does not 
contain any antimicrobial preservative or bacteriostatic agent. No incompatibilities between nivolumab 
and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and non-PVC/non-DEHP (di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate) containers/IV 
components or glass bottles have been observed. Please refer to the current Investigator Brochure for a 
comprehensive description of nivolumab preparation. 
11.1.8 Adverse Events 
Please refer to the nivolumab Investigator’s Brochure for a complete list of adverse events.  
 
Potential safety concerns and recommended management guidelines regarding pulmonary toxicities, GI 
toxicities, hepatotoxicities, endocrinopathies, dermatologic toxicities, and other toxicities of concern 
are summarized below. Management algorithms are found in Appendix 1.  
 
The overall safety experience with nivolumab is based on experience in approximately 17,700 subjects 
as either monotherapy or in combination with other therapeutics. In general, for monotherapy, the 
safety profile is similar across tumor types. The only exception is pulmonary inflammation AEs, which 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 51 of 80 
may be numerically greater in subjects with NSCLC, possibly because in some cases, it can be difficult 
to distinguish between nivolumab-related and unrelated causes of pulmonary symptoms and 
radiographic changes. The most frequently reported treatment-related AE is fatigue, which is almost 
always of low grade. 
 
Most related AEs are thought to be due to the effects of inflammatory cells on specific tissues. A 
variety of preferred terms (PTs) have been used to describe similar kinds of organ-related AEs, with the 
result being that AE frequency tables organized by PTs can lead to underestimation of the frequency of 
similar kinds of organ-related AEs. Select AE categories group together the most common and 
impactful PTs by organ category. These categories include the following: pulmonary, GI, hepatic, skin, 
endocrine, hypersensitivity/infusion reaction, and renal AEs.  
 
Pulmonary Adverse Events 
Pulmonary AEs have been observed following treatment with nivolumab. The frequency of pulmonary 
AEs may be greater with nivolumab combination therapies than with nivolumab monotherapy. The 
majority of cases reported were Grade 1 or 2, and subjects presented with either asymptomatic 
radiographic changes (e.g., focal ground glass opacities and patchy infiltrates) or with symptoms of 
dyspnea, cough, or fever. Subjects with reported Grade 3 or 4 pulmonary AEs were noted to have more 
severe symptoms, more extensive radiographic findings, and hypoxia. Pulmonary AEs have been 
reported in subjects with a variety of tumor types; however, there have been numerically more cases in 
subjects with NSCLC. It is not clear whether the underlying NSCLC is a distinct risk factor, or if 
subjects with NSCLC are more likely to develop radiographic changes and symptoms for which it is 
difficult to distinguish between nivolumab-related and unrelated causes. At this time, no other 
underlying risk factor, including prior radiotherapy, presence of lung metastases, or underlying 
pulmonary medical history, has yet to be identified. 
 
Gastrointestinal Adverse Events 
Gastrointestinal AEs have been observed following treatment with nivolumab. Most cases of diarrhea 
were of low grade (Grade 1-2). Colitis occurred less frequently than diarrhea. High-grade cases of 
diarrhea and colitis were managed with corticosteroids and, in all cases, the events resolved. 
Diverticular Perforation 
The prevalence of diverticulosis in the general population is common and increases with age from 
10% under 40 years of age to approximately 50% over 60 years of age. Approximately 10% to 25% 
of subjects with diverticulosis develop diverticulitis. Perforation occurs in 50% to 70% of instances 
of complicated diverticulitis [36, 37]. Corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 
(NSAIDs), and opioid analgesics are known risk factors for diverticular perforation [38]. Given the 
high prevalence of diverticulosis and diverticulitis in the general population, it is expected that 
some nivolumab-treated subjects will have these conditions concurrently with their malignancy. 
Cases of diverticular perforation while on concomitant corticosteroids (6 cases) or NSAID (1 case) 
were observed in nivolumab program. While there is insufficient evidence to suggest that 
diverticulosis or diverticulitis is a predisposing factor for GI perforation following nivolumab 
administration, clinical caution should be exercised, as appropriate, for subjects on concomitant 
medications of corticosteroids, NSAID, or opioid analgesics. In addition, be vigilant for signs and 
symptoms of potential perforation, especially in subjects with known diverticular disease. 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 52 of 80 
Hepatic Adverse Events 
Hepatic AEs, including elevated liver function tests (LFTs) and, infrequently, drug-induced liver injury 
(DILI) have been observed following treatment with nivolumab and nivolumab in combination with 
ipilimumab. Most cases were of low or moderate grade. Higher-grade hepatic AEs, including DILI, were 
managed with corticosteroids (with or without mycophenolate mofetil) and, in almost all cases, the 
events resolved. 
 
Endocrinopathies 
Endocrinopathies have been observed following treatment with nivolumab. Most cases were of low or 
moderate grade. The events have typically been identified through either routine periodic monitoring of 
specific laboratories (e.g., TSH) or as part of a work-up for associated symptoms (e.g., fatigue). Events 
may occur within weeks of beginning treatment, but also have been noted to occur after many months 
(while still on treatment). More than 1 endocrine organ may be involved (e.g., hypophysitis [pituitary 
inflammation] may need to be evaluated at the time adrenal insufficiency or thyroid disorder is 
suspected). Moderate- to high-grade cases were managed with hormone replacement therapy and, in 
some cases, with the addition of corticosteroids. In some cases, nivolumab treatment was held until 
adequate hormone replacement was provided. 
 
Skin Adverse Events 
Rash and pruritus were the most common skin AEs observed following treatment with nivolumab. The 
rash was typically focal with a maculopapular appearance occurring on the trunk, back, or extremities. 
Most cases have been of low or moderate grade. In some cases, rash and pruritus resolved without 
intervention. Topical corticosteroids have been used for some cases of rash. Anti-histamines have been 
used for some cases of pruritus. More severe cases responded to systemic corticosteroids. 
 
Renal Adverse Events 
Elevated creatinine and biopsy-confirmed tubulointerstitial nephritis and allergic nephritis have been 
infrequently observed following treatment with nivolumab. The frequency of renal AEs may be greater 
with nivolumab combination therapies than with nivolumab monotherapy. Most cases were Grade 2 or 3 
and based on creatinine elevation. Subjects with a history of renal cell carcinoma or prior nephrectomy 
did not appear to be at higher risk. Events were managed with corticosteroids and, in all cases, renal 
function partially or fully improved. 
 
Neurologic Adverse Events 
Neurologic AEs have been uncommonly observed following treatment with nivolumab. The frequency 
of neurologic AEs may be greater with nivolumab + ipilimumab combination therapies than with 
nivolumab monotherapy or other nivolumab combinations. Neurologic AEs can manifest as central 
abnormalities (e.g., aseptic meningitis, encephalopathy, or encephalitis) or peripheral sensory/motor 
neuropathies (e.g., Guillain-Barre Syndrome, myasthenia gravis complicated with sepsis and fatality). 
The onset has been observed as early as after a single treatment with the nivolumab + ipilimumab 
combination. 
 
Infusion Reactions 
Infusion reactions, including high-grade hypersensitivity reactions, following administration of 
nivolumab are uncommon. Investigators are advised to monitor for fever, chills, shakes, itching, rash, 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 53 of 80 
hypertension or hypotension, or difficulty in breathing during and immediately after administration of 
nivolumab. 
 
Lipase/Amylase Elevations 
Asymptomatic elevations in lipase and amylase have been reported. In monotherapy studies, lipase and 
amylase levels were not systematically monitored, so an estimate of the frequency of asymptomatic 
lipase/amylase elevations is unknown. In studies evaluating the safety of the nivolumab + ipilimumab 
combination in multiple tumor types, lipase and amylase levels were systematically monitored, and 
elevations in any grade of lipase/amylase were consistently noted in approximately 10% to 30% of 
subjects. Very few subjects reported associated symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain) or radiographic 
findings (e.g., stranding) consistent with pancreatitis. Thus, there does not seem to be clinical 
significance to the elevated laboratory values. 
 
Uveitis and Visual Complaints 
Immune therapies have been uncommonly associated with visual complaints. Inflammation of 
components within the eye (e.g., uveitis) is an uncommon, but clinically important, event. Uveitis may 
occur more frequently with nivolumab + ipilimumab combination therapy than with nivolumab 
monotherapy or nivolumab in combination with other therapies. An ophthalmologist should evaluate 
visual complaints with examination of the conjunctiva, anterior and posterior chambers, and retina. 
Topical corticosteroids may be used to manage low-grade events. Low-grade events that do not resolve 
and high-grade events should be managed with systemic corticosteroids. Consultation with a BMS 
medical monitor should be sought for all cases of ocular inflammatory events. Complaints of double 
vision should also prompt medical evaluation. In addition to ocular inflammatory events, a work-up 
should also consider pituitary inflammation as a cause. 
 
Other Immune-mediated Adverse Events 
For suspected immune-related adverse reactions, adequate evaluation should be performed to confirm 
etiology or exclude other causes. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, nivolumab or nivolumab 
in combination with ipilimumab should be withheld or discontinued, and corticosteroids administered 
accordingly. Upon improvement, nivolumab or nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab may be 
resumed after corticosteroid taper. If there is recurrence of any Grade 3 or 4 immune-mediated adverse 
reactions or life-threatening immune-related adverse reactions, nivolumab or nivolumab in combination 
with ipilimumab must be permanently discontinued. 
 
Rare cases of myotoxicity (myositis, myocarditis, and rhabdomyolysis), some with fatal outcome, have 
been reported with nivolumab or nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab. If a patient develops signs 
and symptoms of myotoxicity, close monitoring should be implemented, and the patient referred to a 
specialist for assessment and treatment without delay. Based on the severity of myotoxicity, nivolumab 
or nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab should be withheld or discontinued, and appropriate 
treatment instituted. For Grade 3 myocarditis, nivolumab or nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab 
should be permanently discontinued. 
 
The following events have been identified during post approval use of nivolumab or nivolumab in 
combination with ipilimumab. Because reports are voluntary from a population of unknown size, an 
estimate of frequency cannot be made. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 54 of 80 
 Solid organ and tissue transplant rejection has been reported in patients who have previously 
undergone transplantation and who were subsequently treated with programmed cell death 
1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, including nivolumab. Treatment with 
nivolumab may increase the risk of rejection in solid organ or tissue transplant recipients. 
 Rapid-onset and severe GVHD, some with fatal outcome, has been reported in patients who had 
undergone prior allogeneic HSCT and subsequently received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Subjects 
should be screened to determine whether they have undergone a prior allogeneic HSCT prior to 
participating in nivolumab clinical trials. 
 Complications of allogeneic HSCT after treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors including nivolumab, 
administered before allogeneic HSCT, may be associated with an increased risk of transplant-related 
complications, including GVHD. Fatal cases have been reported in clinical studies. Patients should 
be monitored closely for early evidence of transplant-related complications. 
11.2 
Ipilimumab (Yervoy™) 
11.2.1 Other names and properties  
Ipilimumab is a recombinant, human monoclonal antibody that binds to the CTLA-4. Ipilimumab is an 
IgG1 kappa immunoglobulin with an approximate molecular weight of 148 kDa. Ipilimumab is 
produced in mammalian (Chinese hamster ovary) cell culture. 
11.2.2 Supplier/How Supplied 
Bristol-Meyers Squibb will supply ipilimumab at no charge to subjects participating in this clinical 
trial. 
 
The site investigator shall take responsibility for and shall take all steps to maintain appropriate records 
and ensure appropriate supply, storage, handling, distribution, and usage of investigational product in 
accordance with the protocol and any applicable laws and regulations. 
11.2.3 Product Description and Dosage Form 
Ipilimumab injection 200 mg/40 mL (5 mg/mL), is formulated as a clear to slightly opalescent, 
colorless to pale yellow, sterile, nonpyrogenic, single-use, isotonic aqueous solution that may contain 
particles. Ipilimumab injection, 200 mg/40 mL, is supplied in 40 mL Type I flint glass vials, stoppered 
with gray butyl stoppers and sealed with aluminum seals. The drug product is formulated at a 
concentration of 5 mg/mL at a pH of 7.0.  
11.2.4 Storage and Stability  
Ipilimumab Injection, 200 mg/40 mL (5 mg/mL), must be stored refrigerated (2°C to 8°C) and 
protected from light. Ipilimumab injection must not be frozen. Partially used vials or empty vials of 
ipilimumab injection should be discarded at the site according to appropriate drug disposal procedures.  
 
Ipilimumab injection may be stored undiluted (5 mg/mL) or following dilution in 0.9% Sodium 
Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection in PVC, non-PVC/non-DEHP or glass containers for 
up to 24 hours (at 2°C to 8°C) or RT/RL.  
 
Recommended safety measures for preparation and handling include protective clothing, gloves, and 
safety cabinets. 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 55 of 80 
After opening: 
Solution for infusion: From a microbiological point of view, once opened, the medicinal product should 
be infused or diluted and infused immediately. The chemical and physical in-use stability of the 
undiluted or diluted concentrate (between 1 and 4 mg/ml) has been demonstrated for 24 hrs at 25°C and 
2 to 8°C. If not used immediately, the infusion solution (undiluted or diluted) may be stored for up to 
24 hours in a refrigerator (2°C to 8°C) or at room temperature (20°C to 25°C). 
11.2.5 Handling and Disposal 
Preparation should be performed by trained personnel in accordance with good practices rules, 
especially with respect to asepsis. 
 
After final drug reconciliation, unused ipilimumab vials should be disposed at the site following 
procedures for the disposal of anticancer drugs. 
11.2.6 Dispensing 
Ipilimumab must be dispensed only from official study sites and to eligible subjects under the 
supervision of the site investigator. Clinical supplies may not be used for any purpose other than that 
stated in the protocol. The site investigator shall take responsibility for and shall take all steps to 
maintain appropriate records and ensure appropriate supply, storage, handling, distribution, and usage 
of investigational product in accordance with the protocol and any applicable laws and regulations. 
11.2.7 Administration 
Ipilimumab infusion must not be administered as an intravenous push or bolus injection. Administer the 
ipilimumab infusion intravenously over a period of 30 minutes. Ipilimumab infusion should not be 
infused at the same time in the same intravenous line with other agents. Use a separate infusion line for 
the infusion. Use an infusion set and an in-line, sterile, non-pyrogenic, low protein binding filter (pore 
size of 0.2 μm to 1.2 μm). 
 
Ipilimumab infusion is compatible with: 
 PVC infusion sets 
 Polyethersulfone (0.2 μm to 1.2 μm) and nylon (0.2 μm) in-line filters 
 
Flush the line with sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%) solution for injection or 50 mg/ml (5%) glucose 
solution for injection at the end of the infusion. Any unused medicinal product or waste material should 
be discarded in accordance with local requirements. 
 
Ipilimumab can be used for intravenous administration either: 
 without dilution, after transfer to an infusion container using an appropriate sterile syringe; 
or 
 after diluting to up to 5 times the original volume of concentrate (up to 4 parts of diluent to 1 part 
of concentrate). The final concentration should range from 1 to 4 mg/ml. To dilute the 
ipilimumab concentrate, you can use either: 
o sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%) solution for injection; or 
o 50 mg/ml (5%) glucose solution for injection 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 56 of 80 
11.2.8 Adverse Events 
Please refer to the ipilimumab Investigator’s Brochure for a complete list of adverse events.  
 
Blockade of CTLA-4 by ipilimumab leads to T-cell activation, with the potential for clinical 
inflammatory AEs primarily involving the skin (dermatitis/pruritus), GI tract (diarrhea/colitis), liver 
(hepatitis), endocrine glands (eg, hypophysitis and adrenal or thyroid abnormalities), and other less 
frequent organs (eg, uveitis/episcleritis). The majority of these inflammatory AEs initially manifested 
during treatment; however, a minority occurred weeks to months after discontinuation of ipilimumab. 
The majority of the inflammatory AEs is reversible with the guidance issued below and in Appendix 1. 
In rare cases, these inflammatory AEs may be fatal. 
 
Gastrointestinal Toxicities 
The most common site for ipilimumab-induced GI toxicity was the lower GI tract, and the most 
common presentation was mild to severe diarrhea or colitis with occasional bloody stools. In some 
cases, diarrhea began as mild and then worsened. Constipation was rarely associated with ipilimumab 
administration. 
 
Liver Toxicities 
Subjects receiving ipilimumab may develop elevations in LFTs in the absence of clinical symptoms. 
Occasionally, patients may present with symptoms, including right upper quadrant abdominal pain or 
unexplained vomiting. 
 
Endocrine Toxicities 
The most common inflammatory endocrine toxicities occurring in ipilimumab-treated subjects are 
hypophysitis and hypopituitarism. Secondary cortisol deficiency (hypoadrenalism), hypothyroidism or 
thyroiditis, and, less commonly, other endocrinopathies may occur concomitantly with hypophysitis; 
however, these may also present as the only or as primary endocrinopathy. Most patients with 
hypopituitarism presented with nonspecific complaints such as fatigue, visual field defects, confusion, 
or impotence. Some patients have had headache as the predominant presentation. The majority of 
subjects with hypopituitarism demonstrated enlarged pituitary glands based on brain magnetic 
resonance imaging (MRI). Low ACTH and cortisol were the most common biochemical abnormality; 
abnormal (mostly low) thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4), triiodothyronine (T3), 
testosterone, or prolactin have also been reported in some subjects.  
 
Skin Toxicities 
The most common inflammatory skin toxicities occurring in ipilimumab-treated subjects are rash and 
pruritus, mostly mild to moderate in severity. Two cases of fatal treatment-related toxic epidermal 
necrolysis have been reported in clinical trials. Postmarketing surveillance identified a fatal toxic 
epidermal necrolysis event in 1 subject who received ipilimumab after experiencing a severe or life-
threatening skin adverse reaction on a prior cancer immune-stimulating therapy. Caution should be 
used when considering the use of ipilimumab in patients who have previously experienced a severe or 
life-threatening skin adverse reaction on a prior cancer immune-stimulating therapy.  
 
Neurological Toxicities 
Neurological manifestations in subjects treated with ipilimumab may include motor and/or sensory 
neuropathy. Given the difficulty in definitely establishing an inflammatory etiology, alternative 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 57 of 80 
etiologies (eg, tumor progression) should be excluded. Fatal Guillain-Barre syndrome and cases of 
myasthenia gravis have been reported in clinical trials of ipilimumab. Unexplained motor neuropathy, 
muscle weakness, or sensory neuropathy should be evaluated, and noninflammatory causes such as 
disease progression, infections, metabolic disorders, and medications should be excluded. 
 
Other Toxicities 
Ocular inflammation, manifested as Grade 2 or 3 episcleritis or uveitis, was associated with 
concomitant diarrhea in a few subjects (< 1%) and occasionally occurred in the absence of clinically 
apparent GI symptoms. 
 
Other presumed inflammatory events reported include, but were not limited to, the following 
(individually reported for < 1% of subjects unless noted otherwise): arthritis/arthralgias, pneumonitis, 
pancreatitis, autoimmune (aseptic) meningitis, autoimmune nephritis, pure red cell aplasia, noninfective 
myocarditis, polymyositis, eosinophilia, pericarditis, urticaria (2%), large intestinal ulcer, esophagitis, 
acute respiratory distress syndrome, renal failure, infusion reactions, and MG. 
12. 
ADVERSE EVENTS 
12.1 
Definitions 
12.1.1 Adverse Event (AE) 
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence whether or not considered related to the study drug that 
appears to change in intensity during the course of the study. The following are examples of AEs:  
 Unintended or unfavorable sign or symptom 
 A disease temporally associated with participation in the protocol 
 An intercurrent illness or injury that impairs the well-being of the subject 
 
Abnormal laboratory values or diagnostic test results constitute AEs only if they induce clinical signs or 
symptoms or require treatment or further diagnostic tests   
 
Hospitalization for elective surgery or routine clinical procedures that are not the result of an AE (e.g., 
surgical insertion of central line) should not be recorded as an AE.  
 
Disease progression should not be recorded as an AE, unless it is attributable to the study regimen by the 
site investigator. 
12.1.2 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) 
An SAE is an adverse event that: 
 Results in death. NOTE: Death due to disease progression should not be reported as a SAE, 
unless it is attributable by the site investigator to the study drug(s) 
 Is life-threatening (defined as an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the 
event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more 
severe) 
 Requires inpatient hospitalization for >24 hours or prolongation of existing hospitalization. 
NOTE: Hospitalization for anticipated or protocol specified procedures such as administration 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 58 of 80 
of chemotherapy, central line insertion, metastasis interventional therapy, resection of primary 
tumor, or elective surgery, will not be considered serious adverse events. 
 Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity 
 Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect 
 Is an important medical event (defined as a medical event(s) that may not be immediately life-
threatening or result in death or hospitalization but, based upon appropriate medical and 
scientific judgment, may jeopardize the subject or may require intervention (e.g., medical, 
surgical) to prevent one of the other serious outcomes listed in the definition above). Examples 
of such events include, but are not limited to, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at 
home for allergic bronchospasm; blood dyscrasias or convulsions not resulting in hospitalization; 
or the development of drug dependency or drug abuse. 
12.1.3 Unexpected Adverse Event 
For this study, an AE is considered unexpected when it varies in nature, intensity or frequency from 
information provided in the current IB, package insert, or when it is not included in the informed 
consent document as a potential risk. Unexpected also refers to AEs that are mentioned in the IB as 
occurring with a class of drugs or are anticipated from the pharmacological properties of the drug, but 
are not specifically mentioned as occurring with the particular drug under investigation.   
12.1.4 Relatedness 
AEs will be categorized according to the likelihood that they are related to the study drug(s). 
Specifically, they will be categorized using the following terms:  
Unrelated 
The Adverse Event is not related to the drug(s)  
Unlikely 
The Adverse Event is doubtfully related to the drug(s)  
Possible 
The Adverse Event may be related to the drug(s)  
Probable 
The Adverse Event is likely related to the drug(s)  
Definite 
The Adverse Event is clearly related to the drug(s)  
12.1.5 Pregnancy 
If, following initiation of the study drugs, it is subsequently discovered that a subject is pregnant or 
may have been pregnant at the time of study drug exposure, including during at least 6 half-lives after 
study drug administration, the study drug will be permanently discontinued in an appropriate manner 
(e.g., dose tapering if necessary for subject safety).  
 
The site investigator must immediately notify BTCRC AHQ who will then notify Worldwide Safety 
@BMS of this event via the Pregnancy Form in accordance with SAE reporting procedures. 
 
Follow-up information regarding the course of the pregnancy, including perinatal and neonatal outcome 
and, where applicable, offspring information must be reported on the Pregnancy Form [provided upon 
request from BMS]. 
 
Any pregnancy that occurs in a female partner of a male study participant should be reported to BMS. 
Information on this pregnancy will be collected on the Pregnancy Form. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 59 of 80 
12.1.6 Overdose 
An overdose is defined as the accidental or intentional administration of any dose of a product that is, 
in the judgement of the treating physician, considered both excessive and medically important. All 
occurrences of overdose must be reported as a SAE. 
12.2 
Reporting 
12.2.1 Adverse Events 
 AEs will be recorded from time of signed informed consent until 100 days after discontinuation 
of study drug(s) or until a new anti-cancer treatment starts, whichever is earlier. 
 AEs will be recorded regardless of whether or not they are considered related to the study 
drug(s).   
 All AEs will be recorded in the subject’s medical record and on the appropriate study specific 
eCRF form within OnCore. 
 All AEs considered related to study drug(s) will be followed until resolution to ≤ Grade 1 or 
baseline, deemed clinically insignificant, and/or until a new anti-cancer treatment starts, 
whichever occurs first. 
 Asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities that do not require treatment will not be collected as 
adverse events. 
 
12.2.2 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) 
12.2.2.1 Site Requirements for Reporting SAEs to BTCRC Administrative Headquarters 
 SAEs will be reported from time of signed informed consent until 100 days after discontinuation 
of study drug(s) or until a new anti-cancer treatment starts, whichever is earlier.  
 SAEs will be reported on the SAE Submission Form and entered in the SAE tab in OnCore 
within 1 business day of discovery of the event.   
 SAEs include events related and unrelated to the study drug(s).  
 All SAEs will be recorded in the subject’s medical record and on the appropriate study specific 
eCRF form(s) within OnCore.   
 All SAEs regardless of relation to study drug will be followed until resolution to ≤ Grade 1 or 
baseline and/or deemed clinically insignificant and/or until a new anti-cancer treatment starts, 
whichever occurs first. 
 
The site will submit the completed SAE Submission Form (see Documents/Info tab of the EDC) to 
BTCRC AHQ within 1 business day of discovery of the event.  The form may be sent electronically to 
safety@hoosiercancer.org.  The site investigator is responsible for informing the IRB and/or other local 
regulatory bodies of the SAE as per local requirements. 
 
The original copy of the SAE Submission Form and the email correspondence must be kept within the 
study file at the study site. 
 
Once the SAE has resolved, sites must submit a follow up SAE Submission Form within a reasonable 
timeframe to BTCRC AHQ electronically at safety@hoosiercancer.org.  
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 60 of 80 
12.2.2.2 BTCRC AHQ Requirements for Reporting SAEs to BMS 
BTCRC AHQ will report all SAEs to BMS within 1 business day of receipt of the SAE Reporting Form 
from a site.  Follow-up information will be provided to BMS as it is received from a site.   
 
Contact information for sending SAE information to BMS: 
 
SAE Email Address:  Worldwide.Safety@BMS.com 
SAE Facsimile Number:  609-818-3804 
 
12.2.2.3 Sponsor-Investigator Responsibilities 
BTCRC AHQ will send a SAE summary to the sponsor-investigator within 1 business day of receipt of 
SAE Submission Form from a site.  The sponsor-investigator will promptly review the SAE summary 
and assess for expectedness and relatedness. 
12.2.2.4 BTCRC AHQ Responsibilities for Reporting SAEs to FDA 
BTCRC AHQ has been designated to manage the Investigational New Drug Application (IND) 
associated with this protocol on behalf of the sponsor-investigator.  BTCRC AHQ will cross-reference 
this submission to BMS’s parent IND at the time of submission.  Additionally, BTCRC AHQ will 
submit a copy of these documents to BMS at the time of submission to FDA. 
 
BTCRC AHQ will be responsible for all communication with the FDA in accordance with 21CFR312 
which includes but is not limited to the 7 and 15 Day Reports, as well as an Annual Progress Report. 
Additionally, BTCRC AHQ will submit a copy of the 7 and 15 Day Reports and the Annual Progress 
reports to BMS at the time of submission to FDA. 
12.2.2.5 IND Safety Reports Unrelated to this Trial 
BMS will provide BTCRC AHQ with IND safety reports from external studies that involve the study 
drug(s) per their guidelines. BTCRC AHQ will forward the safety reports to the sponsor-investigator 
who will review these reports and determine if revisions are needed to the protocol or consent.  BTCRC 
AHQ will forward these reports to participating sites within 1 business day of receiving the sponsor-
investigator’s review. Based on the sponsor-investigator’s review, applicable changes will be made to 
the protocol and informed consent document (if required). All IND safety reports will also be made 
available to sites via OnCore. 
 
Upon receipt from BTCRC AHQ, site investigators (or designees) are responsible for submitting these 
safety reports to their respective IRBs, as per their IRB policies. 
13. 
STATISTICAL METHODS 
Statistical analysis of this study will be the responsibility of the Department of Biostatistics at Indiana 
University School of Medicine. Parameter estimates and relevant summary statistics will be reported for 
both efficacy and safety outcomes. Continuous variables will be summarized by means, medians, 
minima, maxima, and standard deviations. Categorical variables will be summarized by frequencies and 
percentages. Missing data will not be imputed. Additional exploratory analysis will be conducted when 
appropriate. Changes from the analysis plan will not require an amendment to the protocol unless it 
changes a significant feature in the protocol; however all changes from the original analysis plan will be 
documented in the final study report. The statistical analysis methods are outline below. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 61 of 80 
13.1 
Study Design 
This is a two-arm 1:1 randomized non-comparative Phase II study of consolidation immunotherapy with 
nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for 
unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC. Randomization will be stratified by stage (IIIA vs. IIIB) and 
histology (squamous vs. non-squamous vs. NOS). The two arms will not be compared statistically. 
13.2 
Endpoints 
13.2.1 Definition of Primary Endpoint 
 PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the criteria for disease progression is met as 
defined by RECIST 1.1 or death as a result of any cause. 
13.2.2 Definition of Secondary Endpoints 
 Overall survival will be defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. 
 Time to metastatic disease will be defined as the time from randomization until evidence of 
disease outside of the radiated field. 
 Toxicities will be defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI 
CTCAE) v4. 
13.3 
Sample Size and Accrual 
This is a non-comparative two-arm trial with each arm being analyzed separately.  For Arm 1, when the 
sample size is 51, a non-parametric test (single-group and based on a non-parametric estimate of the 
cumulative hazard function) with a one-sided 0.10 significance level will have 80% power to detect an 
18 month PFS rate of 44% relative to a historical control rate of 30%  (similar to the PACIFIC trial) 
assuming an accrual period of approximately 24 months and maximum follow-up of 48 months (i.e. 
would allow for up to 24 months of follow-up after accrual ends). For Arm 2, when the sample size is 
48, a non-parametric test (as above) with a one-sided 0.10 significance level will have 80% power to 
detect an 18 month PFS of 59% relative to a historical control rate of 44%  (similar to the PACIFIC trial 
in the checkpoint inhibitor arm and a 15% increase in absolute magnitude) assuming an accrual period 
of approximately 24 months and maximum follow-up of 48 months. To account for non-evaluable 
subjects (5%), 54 subjects will be enrolled in Arm 1 and 51 subjects in Arm 2.   
13.4 
Analysis Datasets 
 
Population 
Definition 
Enrolled 
This will comprise all subjects who meet the eligibility criteria 
and are registered onto the study.  
Evaluable 
This will comprise all subjects who receive at least one dose of 
trial drug and either undergo at least one post-baseline 
assessment or die before any evaluation.  
Safety 
This will comprise all subjects that take a least one dose of 
either drug.

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 62 of 80 
13.5 
Assessment of Safety 
Toxicities will be defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) 
v4. 
13.6 
Assessment of Efficacy 
PFS, OS and Time to metastatic disease will be assessed with RECIST 1.1. 
13.7 
Data Analysis Plans 
13.7.1 Analysis Plans for Primary Objective 
For the primary endpoint, PFS at 18 months, each arm will be separately compared to the historical 
control rate of 30% for Arm 1 and 44% for Arm 2 using a one-sided Sign Test for censored data (36)  
in the randomized population.  PFS overall will be estimated with a Kaplan-Meier curve and 80% 
confidence interval. 
13.7.2 Analysis Plans for Secondary Objectives 
OS will be estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve and 95% confidence intervals for the OS medians in 
the randomized population. The cumulative incidence for time to metastatic disease will be calculated 
with those dying from causes other than metastatic disease as a competing risk, and right censoring for 
patients alive and without metastases. Safety will be assessed in the Safety population.  Separate 
frequency tables will be generated for each arm. 
13.7.3 Analysis Plans for Exploratory Objectives 
PD-L1, CD4, and CD8 expression levels in tumor will be correlated with clinical outcomes using 
logistic and Cox regression methods. Changes over time in microRNA, signature protein expression, 
immune markers, inflammatory markers, and other markers (e.g. ESR, CRP, vWF, Ferritin, CTLA-4, 
CD28) will be analyzed with paired t-tests. For BAL samples in the subset of patients with pneunonitis, 
cytokine, chemokine, and other levels will be described using descriptive statistics and graphs.   
 
A univariate analysis using logistic regression and odds ratio will be utilized to assess for an association 
between clinical characteristics of those developing grade 2-5 pneumonitis and those who did not. A 
univariate analysis using logistic regression and odds ratio will be utilized to assess for an association 
between radiation treatment parameters and pneumonitis.Similar logistic and Cox regression models 
will be used to correlate other correlative endpoints mentioned above and below with various clinical 
outcomes. 
13.7.3.1 Whole exome sequencing 
The whole exome sequencing data will be first examined for quality control by using the software 
FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics, Cambridge, UK). Then all qualified sequence reads will be 
aligned to the human genome (hg19) using BWA MEM aligner. The PCR duplicates will be marked 
by PICARD MarkDuplicates. The tool PICARD CollectAlignmentSummaryMetrics and 
CollectHsMetrics will be adopted to assess the coverage across target regions. Analysis-ready BAM 
files will be generated after base quality recalibration by GATK BaseRecalibrator and PrintReads. 
Then we will perform variant call on each individual using GATK HaplotypeCaller in GVCF mode. 
The joint genotyping will be analyzed across all the individuals using GATK GenotypeGVCFs, 
followed by variant quality recalibration by GATK VariantRecalibrator and ApplyRecalibration on 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 63 of 80 
SNPs and INDELs, respectively. Finally, ANNOVAR will be used to annotate variants including 
refGene, 1000 genome allele frequency, and dbNSFP. 
13.7.3.2 RNA-seq 
The RNA sequencing data will be mapped to the human genome (UCSC hg19) by the software STAR 
RNA-seq aligner, following the quality control by the software FastQC. The bamutils will assess the 
reads distribution across the whole genome. Then those uniquely mapped sequencing reads will be 
summarized as gene expression levels by assigned to hg19 refGene genes using featureCounts. Genes 
with low read count per million (CPM), e.g. CPM < 0.5 in more than 2/3 of the samples, will be defined 
as low/non-expressed genes and removed for further analysis. TMM (trimmed mean of M values) 
method will be used to normalize gene expression data. The software edgeR will be used for differential 
expression analysis to compare pre-post treatment samples. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) will 
be selected by a specific cutoff of false discovery rate (FDR), e.g. FDR < 5%, which will be computed 
based on multiple test correction of p-values using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.  
13.7.3.3 Proteomics 
Similar to RNA-seq analysis, we will compare the gene expression difference at protein level between 
pre-post treatment samples.  
13.7.3.4 Lipidomics 
Treatment outcome will be initially accessed by multivariate (principle component analyses) statistics 
using MetaboAnalyst 3.0. The performance of the identified metabolites in discriminating treatment 
outcome will also be evaluated by constructing receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) on the 
dataset, and estimating the area under the curve (AUC). 
13.7.3.5 Methylome 
All methylation sequencing reads will be mapped to the human genome hg19 by using bowtie2. We 
then use a software package, bismark, to achieve the methylation information for all sites of CpG, 
CHG, and CHH, respectively. In this study, we may focus on only CpG methylation. Differentially 
methylated regions (DMRs) between groups of samples will be determined for false discovery rate 
(FDR) < 0.05 using methylKit package in R. Identified DMRs will be associated with genes based on 
their locations.  
13.7.3.6 Data integration 
Based on above individual analysis, we will integrate following sets of genes: (G1) genes with 
mutations, (G2) DEGs at mRNA level, (G3) DEGs at protein level, and (G4) genes with DMRs. Our 
aims are (1) to understand how mutations influence on the gene expression at mRNA level and protein 
level, respectively; (2) to uncover the correlation between mRNA and protein expression; (3) to study 
the association between mutation and DNA methylation; (4) to find the gene network involved in the 
mutation and epigenetic regulation. 
13.7.3.7 Effect of the addition of ipilimumab to consolidation therapy plus nivolumab on PFS. 
For exploratory purposes only, we will compare the two treatment arms via a stratified log-rank test to 
explore the potential effects of the addition of ipilimumab to consolidation therapy plus nivolumab on 
PFS. The study is not powered to test this exploratory hypothesis; however, as an illustration, a sample 
size of 51 per group would have 81% power to detect a difference in 18 month survival of .44 in one 
arm vs .70 in the other arm (hazard ratio of 2.3) using a one-sided log-rank test and alpha level of 0.10. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 64 of 80 
13.7.4 Subgroup Analyses 
No subgroup analyses are planned. 
13.7.5 Other Planned Analyses 
We will generate descriptive statistics for demographic and clinical characteristics in the Enrolled 
Population. 
13.8 
Interim Analysis/Criteria for Stopping Study 
After the 10th subject in each arm is treated with at least one dose of study drug and observed for a 
minimum of 3 months after first dose of study therapy, “unacceptable toxicities warranting early closure 
of the trial” will be evaluated, defined as a) any definitely related immunotherapy death; or b) any 
unexpected and previously unreported grade 4 toxicities definitely related to immunotherapy. If such 
events are observed in one subject, the DSMB will discuss and provide recommendations to the sponsor-
investigator whether to terminate the appropriate arm. If such events are observed in two or more of the 
first 10 subjects, the arm will be terminated. Each arm will be analyzed separately and may result in 
different actions per arm. 
 
After the 25th subject in each arm is treated with at least one dose of study drug and observed for a 
minimum of 3 months after first dose of study therapy, “unacceptable toxicities warranting early closure 
of the trial” will again be evaluated and defined as a) any definitely related immunotherapy death ; or b) 
any unexpected and previously unreported grade 4 toxicities definitely related to immunotherapy. If 
such events are observed in two subjects, the DSMB will discuss and provide recommendations to the 
sponsor-investigator whether to terminate the arm. If such events are observed in three or more of the 
first 25 subjects, the arm will be terminated. Each arm will be analyzed separately and may result in 
different actions per arm. 
 
Pneumonitis of grade 3 and 4 will be continuously monitored. An overall rate of 20% or above would be 
considered unacceptable. If the probability of the grade 3/4 pneumonitis rate being less than 20% drops 
below 0.1, the arm will be terminated. A priori, the rate is assumed to follow ߠ~ܾ݁ݐܽሺ1,1ሻ. Conditional 
on observing ݕ events out of ݊ subjects, the rate follows ߠ|ݕ, ݊~ܾ݁ݐܽሺ1 ൅ݕ, 1 ൅݊െݕሻ. The 
probability of ߠ൏20% is ׬
݂ሺߠ|݊, ݕሻ݀ߠ
଴.ଶ
଴
. The threshold (k) is defined as the smallest ݕ 
corresponding to the integral being smaller than 0.1, which will lead to termination of the arm.  
 
 Thresholds “k” for N=10 to N=54  
N 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 
23 
24
k 
4 
4 
4 
5 
5 
5 
6
6
6
6
7
7
7 
7 
8
N 
25 
26 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31
32
33
34
35
36
37 
38 
39
k 
8 
8 
8 
9 
9 
9 
9
10
10
10
10
11
11 
11 
11
N 
40 
41 
42 
43 
44 
45 
46
47
48
49
50
51
52 
53 
54
k 
12 
12 
12 
12 
12 
13 
13
13
13
14
14
14
14 
15 
15
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 65 of 80 
14. 
TRIAL MANAGEMENT 
14.1 
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP) 
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer 
Center’s (IUSCC) DSMP for moderate risk trials. 
 
BTCRC AHQ facilitated oversight activities include: 
 Review and process all adverse events requiring expedited reporting as defined in the protocol 
 Notify participating sites of adverse events requiring expedited reporting 
 Provide trial accrual progress, safety information, and data summary reports to the sponsor-
investigator 
 Investigators will conduct continuous review of data and patient safety 
14.2 
Data Safety Monitoring Board 
This study will have a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB is chaired by an 
independent medical oncologist external to this trial. The DSMB will provide a recommendation to the 
sponsor-investigator after all information is reviewed. This information will also be provided to BTCRC 
AHQ who will distribute to the site investigator/participating sites for submission to their respective IRB 
according to the local IRB’s policies and procedures. 
 
The DSMB will meet after the first 10 subjects are treated with at least one dose of study drug and 
observed for a minimum of 3 months after first dose of study therapy, in each arm respectively. Accrual 
will not be held while the DSMB review is pending. Each arm will be scrutinized separately and may 
result in different actions per arm.  
 
The DSMB will also meet after the first 25 subjects are treated with at least one dose of study drug and 
observed for a minimum of 3 months after first dose of study therapy, in each arm respectively. Accrual 
will not be held while the DSMB review is pending. Each arm will be scrutinized separately and may 
result in different actions per arm. 
 
From the time of first subject enrollment until the last subect completes study drug administration, the 
DSMB will conduct reviews at least twice a year. 
 
The DSMB review will include but is not limited to: 
 Study accrual patterns  
 Treatment regimen information 
 Adverse event summary report 
 Summary of any deaths on study including cause of death 
 Audit and/or monitoring results, if applicable 
 Protocol deviations 
14.3 
Data Quality Oversight Activities 
Remote validation of Oncore data will be completed on a continual basis throughout the life cycle of the 
study.  A summary report (QC Report) of these checks together with any queries resulting from manual 
review of the eCRFs will be generated for each site and transmitted to the site and the site monitor. 
Corrections will be made by the study site personnel. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 66 of 80 
 
Monitoring visits to the trial sites will be made periodically during the trial to ensure key aspects of the 
protocol are followed. Additional for-cause visits may occur as necessary. Source documents will be 
reviewed for verification of agreement with data entered into OnCore.  It is important for the site 
investigator and their relevant personnel to be available for a sufficient amount of time during the 
monitoring visits or audit, if applicable. The site investigator and institution guarantee access to source 
documents by BTCRC AHQ or its designee. 
 
The trial site may also be subject to quality assurance audit by BMS or its designee as well as inspection 
by appropriate regulatory agencies. 
14.4 
Compliance with Trial Registration and Results Posting Requirements 
Under the terms of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) and the Food and 
Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), the sponsor-investigator of the trial is solely 
responsible for determining whether the trial and its results are subject to the requirements for 
submission to the Clinical Trials Data Bank, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. All results of primary and 
secondary objectives must be posted to CT.gov within a year of completion. The sponsor-investigator 
has delegated responsibility to BTCRC AHQ for registering the trial and posting the results on 
clinicaltrials.gov. Information posted will allow subjects to identify potentially appropriate trials for 
their disease conditions and pursue participation by calling a central contact number for further 
information on appropriate trial locations and study site contact information. 
 
15. 
DATA HANDLING AND RECORD KEEPING 
15.1 
Data Management 
BTCRC AHQ will serve as the Clinical Research Organization for this trial. Data will be collected 
through the web-based clinical research platform, OnCore, a system compliant with Good Clinical 
Practices and Federal Rules and Regulations. BTCRC AHQ personnel will coordinate and manage data 
for quality control assurance and integrity. All data will be collected and entered into OnCore by study 
site personnel from participating institutions.   
15.2 
Case Report Forms and Submission 
Generally, clinical data will be electronically captured in OnCore and correlative results will be captured 
in OnCore or other secure database(s). If procedures on the study calendar are performed for standard of 
care, at minimum, that data will be captured in the source document. Select standard of care data will 
also be captured in OnCore, according to study-specific objectives. Please see the Data and Safety 
Oversight Process (DSOP) guidelines for further details.  
 
The completed dataset is housed at BTCRC AHQ and is the sole property of the sponsor-investigator’s 
institution. It should not be made available in any form to third parties, except for authorized 
representatives of appropriate Health/Regulatory Authorities, without written permission from the 
sponsor-investigator and BTCRC AHQ. After the initial publication, the complete data set will be 
available to all BTCRC institutions. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 67 of 80 
15.3 
Record Retention 
To enable evaluations and/or audits from Health Authorities/BTCRC AHQ, the site investigator agrees 
to keep records, including the identity of all subjects (sufficient information to link records; e.g., hospital 
records), all original signed informed consent forms, copies of all source documents, and detailed 
records of drug disposition.  All source documents are to remain in the subject’s file and retained by the 
site investigator in compliance with local and federal regulations. No records will be destroyed until 
BTCRC AHQ confirms destruction is permitted. 
15.4 
Confidentiality 
There is a slight risk of loss of confidentiality of subject information.  All records identifying the 
subjects will be kept confidential and, to the extent permitted by the applicable laws and/or regulations, 
will not be made publicly available. Information collected will be maintained on secure, password 
protected electronic systems. Paper files that contain personal information will be kept in locked and 
secure locations only accessible to the study site personnel.  
 
Subjects will be informed in writing that some organizations including the sponsor-investigator and 
his/her research associates, BTCRC AHQ, BMS, IRB, or government agencies, like the FDA, may 
inspect their medical records to verify the information collected, and that all personal information made 
available for inspection will be handled in strictest confidence and in accordance with local data 
protection laws. 
 
If the results of the study are published, the subjects’ identities will remain confidential. 
16. 
ETHICS 
16.1 
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval 
The final study protocol and the final version of the informed consent form must be approved in writing 
by an IRB.  The site investigator must submit written approval by the IRB to BTCRC AHQ before he or 
she can enroll subjects into the study.   
 
The site investigator is responsible for informing the IRB of any amendment to the protocol in 
accordance with local requirements.  In addition, the IRB must approve all advertising used to recruit 
subjects for the study.  The protocol must be re-approved by the IRB as local regulations require.  
 
Progress reports and notifications of adverse events will be provided to the IRB per local regulations and 
guidelines. 
16.2 
Ethical Conduct of the Study 
The study will be performed in accordance with ethical principles originating from the Declaration of 
Helsinki. Conduct of the study will follow ICH Good Clinical Practice, and with all applicable federal 
(including 21 CFR parts 56 & 50), state, or local laws. 
16.3 
Informed Consent Process 
The site investigator will ensure the subject is given full and adequate oral and written information about 
the nature, purpose, possible risks and benefits of the study.  Subjects must also be notified they are free 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 68 of 80 
to discontinue from the study at any time.  The subject should be given the opportunity to ask questions 
and allowed time to consider the information provided. 
 
The subject’s signed and dated informed consent must be obtained before conducting any procedure 
specifically for the study.  The site investigator must store the original, signed informed consent form.  
A copy of the signed informed consent form must be given to the subject. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 69 of 80 
 
17. 
REFERENCES 
1. 
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30. 
2. 
SEER Statfact Sheet for Lung Cancer-2016  [Available from: 
http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html. 
3. 
2017 ACS. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/lungcancer-non-smallcell/detailedguide/non-small-cell-
lung-cancer-survival-rates. 
4. 
Dillman RO, Herndon J, Seagren SL, Eaton WL, Jr., Green MR. Improved survival in stage III 
non-small-cell lung cancer: seven-year follow-up of cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 8433 
trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(17):1210-5. 
5. 
Sause W, Kolesar P, Taylor SI, Johnson D, Livingston R, Komaki R, et al. Final results of phase 
III trial in regionally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: Radiation Therapy 
Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and Southwest Oncology Group. Chest. 
2000;117(2):358-64. 
6. 
Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Nishikawa H, Takada Y, Kudoh S, et al. Phase III study of 
concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and 
cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(9):2692-9. 
7. 
Curran WJ, Jr., Paulus R, Langer CJ, Komaki R, Lee JS, Hauser S, et al. Sequential vs. concurrent 
chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J 
Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(19):1452-60. 
8. 
Auperin A, Le Pechoux C, Rolland E, Curran WJ, Furuse K, Fournel P, et al. Meta-analysis of 
concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. 
J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(13):2181-90. 
9. 
Vokes EE, Herndon JE, 2nd, Kelley MJ, Cicchetti MG, Ramnath N, Neill H, et al. Induction 
chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for 
regionally advanced unresectable stage III Non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia 
Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1698-704. 
10. 
Belani CP, Choy H, Bonomi P, Scott C, Travis P, Haluschak J, et al. Combined 
chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell 
lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol. J Clin Oncol. 
2005;23(25):5883-91. 
11. 
Carter DL, Garfield D, Hathorn J, Mundis R, Boehm KA, Ilegbodu D, et al. A randomized phase 
III trial of combined paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation therapy followed by weekly paclitaxel or 
observation for patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung 
Cancer. 2012;13(3):205-13. 
12. 
Hanna N, Neubauer M, Yiannoutsos C, McGarry R, Arseneau J, Ansari R, et al. Phase III study of 
cisplatin, etoposide, and concurrent chest radiation with or without consolidation docetaxel in 
patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: the Hoosier Oncology Group and 
U.S. Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5755-60. 
13. 
Kelly K, Chansky K, Gaspar LE, Albain KS, Jett J, Ung YC, et al. Phase III trial of maintenance 
gefitinib or placebo after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and docetaxel consolidation in inoperable 
stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: SWOG S0023. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15):2450-6. 
14. 
Tsujino K, Kurata T, Yamamoto S, Kawaguchi T, Kubo A, Isa S, et al. Is consolidation 
chemotherapy after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy beneficial for patients with locally advanced 
non-small-cell lung cancer? A pooled analysis of the literature. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(9):1181-9. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 70 of 80 
15. 
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, et al. Overall survival with 
durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. NEJM. 2018; online DOI: 
10.1056/NEJMoa1809697. 
16. 
Sharpe AH, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ. The function of programmed cell death 1 and its 
ligands in regulating autoimmunity and infection. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(3):239-45. 
17. 
Bristol-Myers Squibb Investigational Brochure- Nivolumab; Version 15, 2016 Jun24. 
18. 
Velu V, Titanji K, Zhu B, Husain S, Pladevega A, Lai L, et al. Enhancing SIV-specific immunity 
in vivo by PD-1 blockade. Nature. 2009;458(7235):206-10. 
19. 
Wang C, Thudium KB, Han M, Wang XT, Huang H, Feingersh D, et al. In vitro characterization 
of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, BMS-936558, and in vivo toxicology in non-human 
primates. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(9):846-56. 
20. 
Bristol-Myers Squibb Investigational Brochure- Ipilimumab; Version 19, 2016 Mar2. 
21. 
Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. Combined 
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 
2015;373(1):23-34. 
22. 
Lynch TJ, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R, et al. Ipilimumab in 
combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell 
lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 
2012;30(17):2046-54. 
23. 
Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crino L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab 
versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 
2015;373(2):123-35. 
24. 
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus 
Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 
2015;373(17):1627-39. 
25. 
Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, et al. Pembrolizumab versus 
docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer 
(KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015. 
26. 
Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csoszi T, Fulop A, et al. Pembrolizumab 
versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 
2016;375(19):1823-33. 
27. 
Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, et al. 
Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer 
(POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 
2016;387(10030):1837-46. 
28. 
Hellmann MD, Rizvi NA, Goldman JW, Gettinger SN, Borghaei H, Brahmer JR, et al. Nivolumab 
plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): 
results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):31-41. 
29. 
Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Rizvi NA, Lesokhin AM, et al. Nivolumab 
plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(2):122-33. 
30. 
Antonia SJ, Lopez-Martin JA, Bendell J, Ott PA, Taylor M, Eder JP, et al. Nivolumab alone and 
nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, 
open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):883-95. 
31. 
Antonia S, Goldberg SB, Balmanoukian A, Chaft JE, Sanborn RE, Gupta A, et al. Safety and 
antitumour activity of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre, 
phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(3):299-308. 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 71 of 80 
32. 
Tang C, Wang X, Soh H, Seyedin S, Cortez MA, Krishnan S, et al. Combining radiation and 
immunotherapy: a new systemic therapy for solid tumors? Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(9):831-8. 
33. 
Deng L, Liang H, Burnette B, Beckett M, Darga T, Weichselbaum RR, et al. Irradiation and anti-
PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J Clin Invest. 
2014;124(2):687-95. 
34. 
Vatner RE, Cooper BT, Vanpouille-Box C, Demaria S, Formenti SC. Combinations of 
immunotherapy and radiation in cancer therapy. Front Oncol. 2014;4:325. 
35. 
Ferreira CR, Yannell KE, Mollenhauer B, Espy RD, Cordeiro FB, Ouyang Z, Cooks RG. Chemical 
profiling of cerebrospinal fluid by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2016 
Sep 21;141(18):5252-5. 
36. 
Brookmeyer R and Crowley, JJ. A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics. 
1982;38:29-41. 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 72 of 80 
18. 
APPENDIX 1: ADVERSE EVENT MANAGEMENT ALGORITHMS 
 
These general guidelines constitute guidance to the site Investigator and may be supplemented through 
discussions with the Sponsor-Investigator by contacting the BTCRC project manager. The guidance 
applies to all immuno-oncology agents and regimens. 
 
As general principle, differential diagnoses should be diligently evaluated according to standard medical 
practice. Non-inflammatory etiologies should be considered and appropriately treated. 
 
Corticosteroids are a primary therapy for immuno-oncology drug-related adverse events. The oral 
equivalent of the recommended IV doses may be considered for ambulatory patients with low-grade 
toxicity. The lower bioavailability of oral corticosteroids should be taken into account when switching to 
the equivalent dose of oral corticosteroids. 
 
Consultation with a medical or surgical specialist, especially prior to an invasive diagnostic or 
therapeutic procedure, is recommended. 
 
The frequency and severity of the related adverse events covered by these algorithms will depend on the 
immuno-oncology agent or regimen being used.

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 73 of 80 
 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 74 of 80 
 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 75 of 80 
 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 76 of 80 
 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 77 of 80 
 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 78 of 80 
 
 
 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 79 of 80 
 

Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium 
 
 
  
Clinical Study Protocol 
 
 
 
 
    
BTCRC-LUN16-081 
28FEB2020 
Confidential 
Page 80 of 80