An Open-label, Single-arm, Single-dose, Prospective, Multicenter Phase 3 Study to Establish the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases After Radiation Therapy
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Brain Metastases
Sponsor: Blue Earth Diagnostics

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 1 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL
An Open-label, Single-arm, Single-dose, Prospective, Multicenter Phase 3 Study to 
Establish the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-fluciclovine Positron Emission 
Tomography (PET) in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases after Radiation Therapy
 
REVELATE 
 
BED-FLC-312 
 
Phase: 3
IND Number: 145265 
Protocol Version and Date: Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
 
 
Sponsor: Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Confidentiality Statement
This confidential information about an investigational product is provided for the 
exclusive use of investigators of this product and is subject to recall at any time. The 
information in this document may not be disclosed unless applicable laws or regulations 
require such disclosure. Subject to the foregoing, this information may be disclosed only 
to those persons involved in the study who have a need to know, with the obligation not 
to further disseminate this information.
 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 3 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
CONTENTS 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................................7
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................... 10
STUDY SCHEMA...................................................................................................... 20
1. 
BACKGROUND..................................................................................... 21
1.1.
Overview of Clinical Studies...................................................................22
2.
STUDY RATIONALE............................................................................23
2.1. 
Risk-Benefit Assessment......................................................................... 25
2.1.1. 
Benefit...................................................................................................... 25
2.1.2. 
Risk.......................................................................................................... 25
3.
STUDY OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................27
3.1. 
Primary Objective.................................................................................... 27
3.2. 
Secondary Objectives .............................................................................. 27
4.
STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................28
4.1. 
Study Overview ....................................................................................... 28
5. 
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION ........................................................... 31
5.1. 
Primary Efficacy Endpoint ......................................................................31
5.2. 
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints.................................................................31
5.3. 
Safety Evaluations ................................................................................... 31
6. 
SUBJECT SELECTION.......................................................................... 32
6.1. 
Study Population...................................................................................... 32
6.2.
Inclusion Criteria .....................................................................................32
6.3. 
Exclusion Criteria.................................................................................... 33
7.
CONCURRENT MEDICATIONS..........................................................34
7.1. 
Allowed Medications and Treatments ..................................................... 34
7.2. 
Prohibited Medications and Treatments .................................................. 34
8. 
STUDY TREATMENTS......................................................................... 35
8.1. 
Method of Assigning Subjects to Treatment Groups ..............................35
8.2. 
Blinding ................................................................................................... 35
8.3. 
Formulation of Test Product .................................................................... 35
8.4. 
Packaging and Labelling .......................................................................... 35
8.5. 
Supply of Study Drug at the Site............................................................. 35
8.6. 
Dosage/Dosage Regimen .........................................................................35
8.7. 
Dispensing ............................................................................................... 36
8.8. 
Administration Instructions .....................................................................36

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 4 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
8.9. 
Storage..................................................................................................... 36
8.10. 
Study Drug Accountability ...................................................................... 36
8.11.
Measures of Treatment Compliance........................................................37
8.12.
End Of Trial.............................................................................................37
9. 
STUDY PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES....................................... 38
9.1. 
Clinical Assessments ............................................................................... 42
9.1.1. 
Concomitant Medications ........................................................................ 42
9.1.2.
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics .............................................42
9.1.3.
ECOG Performance Status ......................................................................42
9.1.4. 
Medical History ....................................................................................... 42
9.1.5. 
Imaging Studies ....................................................................................... 42
9.1.6. 
Vital Signs ............................................................................................... 44
9.1.7.
SoC Biopsy/Neurosurgical Intervention..................................................44
9.1.8.
Clinical Follow-Up / Data Abstraction....................................................44
9.2. 
Clinical Laboratory Measurements.......................................................... 45
9.2.1. 
Pregnancy Test......................................................................................... 45
10. 
EVALUATIONS BY VISIT ................................................................... 46
10.1. 
Visit 1 –Screening.................................................................................... 46
10.2. 
Visit 2 - Day 1: IMP Administration and Dynamic PET Scan (1 to 
28 days after Screening) .......................................................................... 47
10.3. 
Visit 2 – Day 1 or up to 3 days after 18F-fluciclovine Administration: On-
Study MRI Brain Scan .............................................................................47
10.4. 
Visit 3 – Safety Follow-up (+1 to 3 days after IMP Injection/PET) ....... 48
10.5.
Visit 4 – SoC Biopsy/Neurosurgical Intervention (if applicable, pre-
planned 1 to 21 days after IMP Injection/PET) ....................................... 48
10.6. 
Visit 5 – Month 6 Follow-up (183 days ± 14 days) ................................. 49
10.7.
Early Withdrawal.....................................................................................49
11. 
IMAGING PROTOCOL ......................................................................... 51
11.1. 
18F-fluciclovine PET Scan Patient Preparation........................................ 51
11.2. 
PET/CT Scanner...................................................................................... 51
11.3. 
18F-fluciclovine Injection Administration................................................ 51
11.4. 
18F-fluciclovine PET Acquisition ............................................................51
11.5. 
On-Study MRI Acquisition...................................................................... 51
11.6. 
Image Transfer ......................................................................................... 51
11.7. 
Image Evaluability ................................................................................... 51
11.8. 
Central Evaluations.................................................................................. 51

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 5 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
11.8.1.
Central Histopathology ............................................................................ 51
11.8.2.
Central Truth Panel .................................................................................. 52
11.8.3.
Blinded Image Evaluation .......................................................................52
11.8.4.
Central Neuroradiologist Reader .............................................................52
12. 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION............ 53
12.1. 
Adverse Events ........................................................................................ 53
12.2. 
AE Severity.............................................................................................. 53
12.3.
Adverse Event Relationship to IMP ........................................................54
12.4.
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) .................................................................54
12.4.1.
Serious Adverse Event Reporting ............................................................ 54
12.4.2.
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR).................. 55
12.4.3.
Pregnancy ................................................................................................ 55
13.
DISCONTINUATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SUBJECTS ..........56
13.1.
Discontinuation/Withdrawal from the Study...........................................56
13.2. 
Replacement of Subjects.......................................................................... 56
13.3. 
Lost to Follow-up .................................................................................... 56
14. 
PROTOCOL VIOLATIONS................................................................... 58
15. 
STATISTICAL METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS ...................... 59
15.1. 
Estimation of Sample Size....................................................................... 59
15.2. 
Analysis Sets............................................................................................ 59
15.3. 
Subject Disposition.................................................................................. 59
15.4.
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics .............................................59
15.5. 
Analysis of Primary Endpoint ................................................................. 60
15.6.
Analysis of Secondary Endpoint(s) .........................................................60
15.6.1.
Subject-Level Positive Predictive Value / Negative Predictive Value .... 60
15.6.2.
Lesion-Level Diagnostic Performance ....................................................60
15.6.3.
Subgroup Analysis of Diagnostic Performance Data.............................. 60
15.6.4.
Clinical Utility ......................................................................................... 60
15.6.5.
Inter-Reader / Intra-Reader Agreement ................................................... 61
15.6.6.
Safety ....................................................................................................... 61
15.7. 
Planned Interim Analysis......................................................................... 61
16. 
DATA COLLECTION, RETENTION AND MONITORING ............... 62
16.1. 
Data Collection Instruments ....................................................................62
16.2. 
Data Management Procedures ................................................................. 62
16.3. 
Data Quality Control and Reporting ........................................................ 62

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 6 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
16.4. 
Archiving of Data .................................................................................... 63
16.5. 
Availability and Retention of Investigational Records ............................ 63
16.6.
Monitoring and Auditing.........................................................................63
16.7.
Subject Confidentiality............................................................................63
17. 
REGULATORY, ETHICAL AND STUDY OVERSIGHT 
CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................... 64
17.1. 
Institutional Review Boards and Independent Ethics Committees..........64
17.2.
Amendments............................................................................................64
17.3.
Subject Information and Consent/Assent ................................................64
17.4. 
Post-trial care ........................................................................................... 65
17.5. 
Publications.............................................................................................. 65
17.6. 
Investigator Responsibilities.................................................................... 66
18.
REFERENCES ........................................................................................68
APPENDIX 1.
ECOG PERFORMANCE STATUS................................................72
APPENDIX 2. PROTOCOL AGREEMENT .......................................................... 73
LIST OF TABLES 
Table 1. Schedule of Study Procedures ...................................................................... 39
Table 2. CTCAE (V5) AE Severity Grading .............................................................. 53
LIST OF FIGURES 
Figure 1. Schema of Study Design ............................................................................. 20

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 7 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 
AE
Adverse event 
ALARA 
As low as reasonably achievable 
ASCT2 
Alanine-serine-cysteine-transporter 2 
BED 
Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd
BIE 
Blinded image evaluation 
BTIP-BM 
Brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain 
metastases  
CBP 
Child-bearing potential 
CE 
Contrast enhancement 
CI 
Confidence interval 
CLR 
Complete lesion response 
CT 
Computerized tomography 
CTCAE 
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events  
CTP 
Central Truth Panel 
ECOG 
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 
eCRF 
Electronic Case Report form 
EU 
European Union 
18F
Isotope of fluorine
FACBC 
18F-labeled 1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid 
FAS
Full Analysis Set
FDA 
Food and Drug Administration 
FDG 
Fluorodeoxyglucose 
18F-FDOPA 
18F-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine 
18F-FET
18F-fluoro-ethyltyrosine
FLAIR 
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery 
GCP 
Good Clinical Practice 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 8 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
HCG 
Human chorionic gonadotropin 
HIPAA 
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
ICF 
Informed consent form
ICH 
International Council for Harmonisation 
IEC 
Independent Ethics Committee 
IIT 
Investigator-initiated trial 
IMP 
Investigational medicinal product 
IRB 
Institutional Review Board 
IV 
Intravenous 
LAR 
Legally Authorized Representative 
LAT1 
L-type amino acid transporter 1 
LITT 
Laser interstitial thermal therapy  
MBq 
MegaBecquerel 
mCi 
Millicurie 
MedDRA 
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 
MR 
Magnetic resonance 
MRI 
Magnetic resonance imaging 
NBTS 
National Brain Tumor Society 
NCCN 
National Comprehensive Cancer Network 
NCI 
National Cancer Institute 
NMP 
Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Ltd 
NPA 
Negative percent agreement 
NPV 
Negative predictive value 
PET 
Positron emission tomography 
PPA 
Positive percent agreement 
PPV 
Positive predictive value 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 9 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
PT 
Preferred term
RANO 
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology 
SAE 
Serious adverse event
SAP 
Statistical Analysis Plan
SAF 
Safety Analysis Set 
SoC 
Standard of Care 
SoR 
Standard of Reference 
SoT 
Standard of Truth 
SRS 
Stereotactic radiosurgery 
SUSAR 
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction 
TEAE 
Treatment-emergent adverse event 
USA 
United States of America 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 10 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS 
Study Title
An open-label, single-arm, single-dose, prospective, multicenter 
Phase 3 study to establish the diagnostic performance of 
18F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET) in 
detecting recurrent brain metastases after radiation therapy 
(REVELATE)
Phase 
3
Sponsor 
Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Funding Organization
Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Study Design 
This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-dose study 
in subjects with solid tumor brain metastases previously treated 
with radiation therapy, designed to establish the diagnostic 
performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET (read with standard 
magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] for anatomical reference) in 
detecting recurrent brain metastases where MRI is equivocal.
Number of Subjects 
Approximately 150 subjects will be enrolled, to obtain 
130 evaluable subjects. 
Study Rationale 
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor in 
adults, occurring in up to 40% of patients with cancer 
(Suh, 2010; Sinha, 2017), with approximately 200,000 patients 
affected each year in the United States of America (USA) 
(Arvold, 2016). Following localized treatment of brain 
metastases (increasingly, stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] 
alongside neurosurgical resection [Kann, 2017; NCCN, 2019]), 
close follow-up with serial MRI of the brain is performed to 
evaluate for recurrent disease. Conventional MRI is currently 
recommended as the main imaging test (NCCN, 2019) following 
localized treatment, as it is widely available and offers high 
spatial resolution, with presence of recurrent disease suggested 
by increased contrast enhancement (CE) depicting 
anatomical/structural information. However, conventional MRI 
(CE-T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]/T2-
weighted sequences) has limited specificity due to the incidence 
of treatment-related changes, primarily radiation necrosis 
(Galldiks, 2019). These treatment-related changes have similar 
appearances to true recurrence of disease on conventional MRI, 
including CE, origin near the primary tumor site, vasogenic 
edema, growth over time, and mass effect (Langen, 2017; 
Langen, 2018; Pope, 2018). 
No specific feature or combination of features on conventional 
MRI has been established to differentiate between disease 
recurrence and treatment-related changes including radiation 
necrosis and pseudoprogression (Verma, 2013). Specificity of 
conventional MRI to diagnose recurrent tumor after SRS using 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 12 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
confirmed and it is approved for clinical use in this condition. 
18F-fluciclovine is also reported to have utility in the evaluation 
of primary and metastatic cancers in the brain due to its low 
normal brain background uptake and increased uptake by brain 
tumors (Parent, 2018; Patel, 2018; Tsuyuguchi, 2017). In 
particular, one study performed specifically in subjects with 
previously treated brain metastases and an MRI indeterminate 
for recurrence reported increased 18F-fluciclovine uptake in all 
lesions with recurrence, and low 18F-fluciclovine uptake in 
lesions with treatment-related change (Patel, 2018). However, 
the datasets of this study were too small to perform robust 
characterization of diagnostic performance nor inform image 
interpretation criteria. A separate Phase 2b study 
(BED-FLC-219) is being conducted by Blue Earth Diagnostics, 
Ltd to establish image interpretation criteria.  
18F-fluciclovine has been demonstrated to be transported by 
amino acid transporters alanine-serine-cysteine-transporter 2 
(ASCT2) and L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), which 
are high-affinity glutamine and leucine transporters, respectively 
(Schuster, 2014). Given the known increased expression of 
ASCT2 and LAT1 in many tumor types (including the 3 most
common sources of brain metastases: lung, breast and skin 
cancer) (Fuchs, 2005), and aforementioned early clinical study 
data, it is anticipated that PET imaging with 18F-fluciclovine will 
be useful in detecting recurrent brain metastases. 
Throughout the present Phase 3 study, 18F-fluciclovine PET will 
be read with standard MRI for anatomical reference. Standard 
MRI sequences performed on study will include contrast 
enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted/FLAIR and diffusion-
weighted imaging (Kaufmann, 2020).
Primary Objective 
and Outcome 
Measure
Objective: 
1. To assess the negative 
percent agreement 
(NPA) and positive 
percent agreement 
(PPA) of 
18F-fluciclovine PET in 
detecting recurrent 
brain metastases on a 
subject-level. 
Outcome Measure: 
1. Subject-level NPA and 
PPA (equivalent to 
specificity and 
sensitivity, 
respectively) of 
18F-fluciclovine PET in 
detecting recurrent 
brain metastases.  
Secondary Objectives 
and Outcome 
Measures 
Objectives:
1. To assess other 
diagnostic performance 
parameters of 
18F-fluciclovine PET in 
detecting recurrent 
Outcome Measures: 
1. Subject-level positive 
predictive value (PPV) 
and negative predictive 
value (NPV) of 
18F-fluciclovine PET 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 13 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
brain metastases on a 
subject-level.  
for detecting recurrent 
brain metastases.  
2. To assess lesion-level 
diagnostic performance 
of 18F-fluciclovine PET 
in detecting recurrent 
brain metastases.
2. Lesion-level PPA, 
NPA, PPV and NPV of 
18F-fluciclovine PET 
for detecting recurrent 
brain metastases. 
3. To assess subject-level 
diagnostic performance 
of 18F-fluciclovine PET 
in detecting recurrent 
brain metastases in 
different clinical 
settings.  
3. Sub-group analyses of 
subject-level PPA, 
NPA, PPV, and NPV 
of 18F-fluciclovine 
PET, according to 
primary tumor type and 
concurrent 
immunotherapy. 
4. To evaluate the added 
clinical usefulness of 
18F-fluciclovine PET in 
evaluation of subjects 
with suspected 
recurrent brain 
metastases.
4. Clinical usefulness:
(a) Number of days taken 
by the site to establish 
presence/absence of 
metastasis by clinical 
follow-up.  
(b) Proportion of subjects 
with additional 
metastases identified 
on 18F-fluciclovine 
PET in addition to 
standard of care brain 
MRI. 
(c) Proportion of subjects 
whose prospective 
diagnostic management 
plan changes following 
18F-fluciclovine PET. 
5. To establish inter- and 
intra-reader 
reproducibility of 
18F-fluciclovine PET 
image interpretation for 
detecting recurrent 
brain metastases.
5. Inter-reader and intra-
reader agreement 
statistics (kappa 
coefficient).  
 
6. To assess the safety of 
18F-fluciclovine 
injection in the subject 
population.
6. Treatment-emergent 
adverse events 
(TEAEs) following 
18F-fluciclovine 
injection in the subject 
population.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 14 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
Safety Evaluations 
Safety will be assessed from the time of 18F-fluciclovine 
administration until 1 day post 18F-fluciclovine administration 
based on reported serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-
serious adverse events (AEs).
Study Sites
Approximately 18 sites / US Only
Investigational 
Medicinal Product(s), 
including Control 
Products 
Investigational Medicinal Product:  
18F-fluciclovine injection, 185 MBq (5 mCi) ± 20%, delivered as 
an intravenous bolus
Control Product: Not applicable.
Study and Subject 
Duration 
Study Duration: Approximately 20 months
Subject Duration: 7 months per subject (1 day for AE 
monitoring following 18F-fluciclovine PET scan) 
Subject Population 
Subjects with solid tumor brain metastases previously treated 
with radiation therapy who meet the inclusion and exclusion 
criteria will be eligible for participation in this study.   
Subject Selection 
Inclusion Criteria: 
1. 
 
2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 
performance status of 0-2. 
3. Subject or subject’s Legally Authorized Representative 
(LAR) is willing and able to provide written informed 
consent. 
4. Previous history of solid tumor brain metastasis of any 
origin. 
5. Histopathological confirmation of the primary solid 
tumor or a metastatic site within 4 years of Screening 
(Visit 1). Cancer of unknown primary is excluded. 
6. Previous radiation therapy of brain metastatic lesion(s) 
completed at least 8 weeks before Screening. Form of 
radiotherapy may include stereotactic radiosurgery or 
whole brain radiotherapy, previously delivered as 
primary (initial) treatment, in the adjuvant setting (e.g., 
post-surgery), salvage setting (repeat radiation therapy), 
in or out of the context of previous or concurrent 
systemic treatments. 
7. A reference lesion considered by the site investigator to 
be equivocal for recurrent brain metastasis, as 
determined by a recent* standard of care (SoC) MRI 
brain scan**, measuring 
 mm in longest diameter on 
contrast-enhanced MRI, and meeting one of the 
following radiological criteria: 
a.
reference lesion on contrast-enhanced MRI relative to 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 16 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
chemotherapy, anti-estrogens, or ovarian 
suppression. 
10. All subjects, male and female, who are not surgically 
sterilized or postmenopausal as defined above, must 
agree to abstain from sexual conduct for 24 hours 
post-18F-fluciclovine injection.
Exclusion Criteria: 
1. Pregnant or breastfeeding during participation in the 
study, or, where applicable, unwilling to abstain from 
sexual conduct for 24 hours post-18F-fluciclovine 
injection.
2. Subjects with any medical condition or circumstance that 
the investigator believes may confound the data 
collected. 
3. Subjects with active hematological malignancy or cancer 
of unknown primary. 
4. Subject has received, or is scheduled to receive, another 
investigational medicinal product (IMP) from 1 month or 
within 5 half-lives of the other IMP (whichever is 
shorter) before 18F-fluciclovine injection to the 
completion of Visit 3.* 
*
Subjects receiving concurrent systemic therapies, 
including immunotherapies, are permitted for study 
entry as long as the concurrent therapy is not an 
IMP. 
5. Known contraindications to a contrast-enhanced MRI 
procedure. 
Planned Interim 
Analyses
Not applicable.
Study Definitions of 
Term(s) 
Reference Lesion
The reference lesion is defined as the lesion which is:  
a.
Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI 
(according to inclusion criterion #7).  
b. Intended for SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention 
procedure (if planned). If >1 lesion is intended for 
biopsy/intervention, the largest of these lesions will 
be the reference lesion. 
c.
Where clinical follow-up is planned, the largest of all 
equivocal lesions (if >1 is present) will be the 
reference lesion.  

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 17 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
If >1 equivocal lesion is under evaluation as SoC, the on-site 
investigator will also annotate ‘other equivocal lesions’ on the 
pre-study SoC MRI brain scan, defined as follows: 
a.
Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI 
(according to the same radiological criteria for a 
reference lesion per inclusion criterion #7). 
b. Where SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention 
procedure is planned, these are the other equivocal 
lesions pre-planned for biopsy/intervention. 
c.
Where SoC clinical follow-up is planned, these are 
the other equivocal lesions pre-planned for SoC 
clinical follow-up 
The on-site investigator will also review the 18F-fluciclovine 
PET scan to identify potential additional lesions, not previously 
reported on SoC MRI (termed ‘additional PET lesions’). 
Additional PET lesions should be annotated only where judged 
suggestive of brain metastasis, warranting confirmation by 
clinical follow-up, biopsy or resection, according to SoC 
practice. Undertaking biopsy/resection of additional PET 
lesion(s) identified on the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan is at the 
discretion of on-site investigators.  
STATISTICS 
Primary Analysis 
Plan 
Analysis of Primary Endpoint 
The primary endpoint for the study is subject-level NPA and 
PPA (equivalent to specificity and sensitivity, respectively) of 
18F-fluciclovine PET in detecting recurrent brain metastases. 
Subject-level NPA and PPA will be calculated based on blinded 
image evaluation (BIE) of 18F-fluciclovine PET compared to 
standard of reference (SoR) on the reference lesion. 
Where NPA0 and PPA0 are performance goals for NPA and 
PPA, respectively, performance goals of 50% (NPA0) for NPA 
and 50% (PPA0) for PPA were selected as acceptable thresholds 
given the setting where SoC imaging is already equivocal. The 
analyses for NPA and PPA will be performed using the one-
sample binomial exact test. In addition to the rates, exact two-
sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to the 
Clopper-Pearson method will also be provided. If the pre-
defined NPA and PPA goals are met by the same two of three 
readers (both tests reach statistical significance for the same two 
readers), the study will be considered to have successfully 
demonstrated the effectiveness of 18F-fluciclovine PET in 
detecting recurrent brain metastases. 
Analysis of Secondary Endpoints 
Subject-level PPV and NPV of 18F-fluciclovine PET for 
detecting recurrent brain metastases will be calculated based on 
BIE of 18F-fluciclovine PET compared to SoR on the reference 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 19 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
will be presented for the initial read vs re-read of a subset of 
PET scans for each reader. 
Analysis of Safety
Safety will be assessed from the time of 18F-fluciclovine 
administration until 1 day post-18F-fluciclovine administration 
based on reported serious and non-serious adverse events (SAEs 
and AEs, respectively).  
For the evaluation of safety, TEAEs are defined as those AEs 
with onset after the dose of IMP, or existing events that 
worsened after the dose of IMP during the study, up to 1 day 
following IMP administration. Verbatim terms of the AEs will 
be coded to preferred terms (PTs) and system organ classes 
(SOCs) using the latest version of Medical Dictionary for 
Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), for data summary purposes. 
Severity of AEs will be graded using the NCI-CTCAE v5.0. The 
frequency of TEAEs will be summarized overall, by SOC and 
PT, and by severity. IMP-related AEs and SAEs will also be 
summarized.
Rationale for Number 
of Subjects 
A one-sample binomial exact test will be used to test the 
following hypotheses in NPA and PPA of 18F-fluciclovine PET: 
NPA
 H0(NPA
0
 H1(NPA): NPA of PET >NPA0
PPA
H0(PPA
0
 H1(PPA): PPA of PET >PPA0
Where NPA0 and PPA0 are performance goals for NPA and 
PPA, respectively.  
Performance goals of 50% (NPA0) for NPA and 50% (PPA0) for 
PPA were selected as acceptable thresholds given the setting 
where SoC imaging is already equivocal. The lower limits for 
the exact 95% CIs (Clopper-Pearson method) for both NPA and 
PPA should be greater than 50%. Assuming an NPA of at least 
70% and a PPA of at least 70% for 18F-fluciclovine PET would 
need to be observed, a sample size of 130 would achieve 90% 
power at a 1-sided significance level of 0.025 to reject the 
performance goals for both NPA and PPA, assuming a brain 
metastasis prevalence rate of 0.5. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 20 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
STUDY SCHEMA 
Figure 1. Schema of Study Design 
*As applicable; Visit 4 may not apply to all subjects.  
IMP, investigational medicinal product; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission 
tomography; SoC, standard of care. 
Prior to 
Enrollment 
SoC MRI
Visit 1: Screening
Day -28 to -1 
0 to 41 days after SoC MRI. 1 to 28 days before Visit 2. 
Obtain informed consent. Conduct Screening assessments, 
including inclusion and exclusion criteria; disease history. 
Refer to Table 1, Schedule of Study Procedures 
Visit 2: IMP 
Administration / 
PET
Day 1
1 to 42 days after SoC MRI. 1 to 21 days before planned 
SoC biopsy or neurosurgical intervention  
Administer Investigational Product and Perform PET 
Scan. Refer to Table 1, Schedule of Study Procedures 
Visit 2: 
On-Study MRI 
Day 1 + 0 to 
3 days 
MRI brain (same day as PET or up to 3 days after PET) 
Refer to Table 1, Schedule of Study Procedures 
Visit 3: 
Safety Follow-up 
Day 2 to 4 
Day 1 + 1 to 3 days. Safety Follow-up contact.
Refer to Table 1, Schedule of Study Procedures 
Visit 4: SoC 
Biopsy / 
Neurosurgical 
Intervention* 
Day 2 to 22 
Pre-planned SoC Neurosurgical Intervention 1 to 21 days 
after Day 1  
Refer to Table 1, Schedule of Study Procedures 
Visit 5: Month 6  
Follow-up 
6 months after Visit 2 18F-fluciclovine PET.  
Follow-up clinical data collection 
Refer to Table 1, Schedule of Study Procedures 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 22 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
1.1. 
Overview of Clinical Studies 
Two small investigator-initiated trials (IITs) conducted at Emory University have evaluated 
18F-fluciclovine for PET imaging of brain metastases in adults (Schuster, 2003; Patel, 2018), 
with results suggesting efficacy. Both studies reported increased 18F-fluciclovine uptake in 
brain metastases: one study in 5 subjects with 9 lesions and another in 12 subjects with 
17 lesions. In the larger study, all subjects had prior treatment for brain metastases and had a 
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indeterminate for recurrent disease. Using either biopsy 
or clinical follow-up as the standard of truth (SoT), 15/15 18F-fluciclovine positive lesions 
were determined to be recurrent disease. On the other hand, the remaining 2 lesions were 
determined to be radiation necrosis, both of which had low 18F-fluciclovine uptake.
Apart from brain metastases, other studies have also reported the use of 18F-fluciclovine in 
other neuro-oncology settings (Parent, 2018; Karlberg, 2019; Michaud, 2020; 
Bogsrud, 2019). This includes one IIT in suspected recurrent primary brain tumor (N=27) 
(Michaud, 2020), where tumor uptake of 18F-fluciclovine provided significantly higher image 
contrast to 11C-methionine. 18F-fluciclovine, based on a subset of 3 subjects with 
indeterminate MRI, was suggested to be potentially useful in this setting. A retrospective 
analysis of 21 subjects with suspected residual or recurrent high grade glioma 
(Bogsrud, 2019) reported high 18F-fluciclovine uptake in histopathologically / clinically 
confirmed disease, including the detection of small satellite tumors not previously visualized 
with MRI in 4 subjects. A recent report of 2 cases has also described the successful use of 
18F-fluciclovine PET-MRI–guided biopsy in post-treatment glioblastoma to distinguish areas 
of tumor recurrence from areas of predominant treatment effect (Henderson, 2019). Industry 
sponsored studies include 4 studies conducted by Nihon Medi-Physics Co., Ltd (NMP) in 
subjects with treatment-naïve glioma: NMK36-BT-P201 (N=5) (Kondo, 2016), 
MK36-BT-P202 (N=40) (Wakabayashi, 2017), NMK36-BT-P301 and NMK36-BT-P302. 
These studies collectively suggest the potential for 18F-fluciclovine to delineate extent of 
treatment-naïve primary brain tumor beyond contrast-enhancing regions on MRI. 
As a marketed product, 18F-fluciclovine has been administered to more than 75,000 patients. 
Safety data are available from 1203 subjects exposed to 18F-fluciclovine in clinical trials. The 
doses administered range from 51.8 to 485 MBq, with the majority of subjects receiving 
approximately 370 MBq for the imaging of prostate cancer, and approximately 180 MBq for 
glioma in Studies NMK36-BT-P201, NMK36-BT-P202, NMK36-BT-P301 and 
NMK36-BT-P302. No deaths and no serious adverse events (SAEs) attributable to 
18F-fluciclovine injection have been reported. Adverse events (AEs) have generally been mild 
in intensity. Based on the accumulated information, injection site reactions, dysgeusia and 
parosmia are considered to be adverse reactions associated with receipt of 18F-fluciclovine 
injection in humans; these events occurred in 17/1203 (1.4%) subjects overall. 
Based upon preliminary data from the 2 IITs conducted at Emory University (Schuster, 2003; 
Patel, 2018), and supported by experience reported from the collective clinical studies of 
18F-fluciclovine in other brain tumor settings (Parent, 2018; Karlberg, 2019; Michaud, 2020; 
Bogsrud, 2019; Henderson, 2019), BED has a clinical program in development to support the 
use of 18F-fluciclovine PET imaging to detect brain metastases in adults with suspected 
recurrence after radiation therapy. Within this clinical program, BED is conducting a Phase 2 
study (BED-FLC-219) designed to define image interpretation criteria, and the present 
Phase 3 study (BED-FLC-312) designed to establish the diagnostic performance of 
18F-fluciclovine PET (read with standard MRI for anatomical reference) in detecting 
recurrent brain metastases where MRI is equivocal. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 23 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
2. 
STUDY RATIONALE 
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor in adults, occurring in up to 40% of 
patients with cancer (Suh, 2010; Sinha, 2017), with approximately 200,000 patients affected 
each year in the USA (Arvold, 2016). Following localized treatment of brain metastases 
(increasingly, stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] alongside neurosurgical resection [Kann, 2017; 
NCCN, 2019]), close follow-up with serial MRI of the brain is performed to evaluate for 
recurrent disease. Conventional MRI is currently recommended as the main imaging test 
(NCCN, 2019) following localized treatment, as it is widely available and offers high spatial 
resolution, with presence of recurrent disease suggested by increased contrast enhancement 
(CE) depicting anatomical/structural information. However, conventional MRI (CE-T1 and 
fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]/T2-weighted sequences) has limited specificity 
due to the incidence of treatment-related changes, primarily radiation necrosis 
(Galldiks, 2019). These treatment-related changes have similar appearances to true recurrence 
of disease on conventional MRI, including CE, origin near the primary tumor site, vasogenic 
edema, growth over time, and mass effect (Langen, 2017; Langen, 2018; Pope, 2018). 
No specific feature or combination of features on conventional MRI has been established to 
differentiate between disease recurrence and treatment-related changes, including radiation 
necrosis and pseudoprogression (Verma, 2013). Specificity of conventional MRI to diagnose 
recurrent tumor after SRS using visual reads has been reported to be as low as 19% 
(Peng, 2018), with attempts at validating permutations of neuroradiologist-defined 
measurements reporting specificities of 32% to 41% (Dequesada, 2008; Stockham, 2012). 
Alongside the estimated 25% incidence rate of radiation necrosis (Vellayappan, 2018), rates 
of true local recurrence of disease are similar, ranging from 27% to 31% (Kocher, 2011; 
Brown, 2010). Therefore, the true prevalence of recurrent disease post-radiotherapy where 
conventional MRI indicates the possibility of recurrence, can be estimated to be 
approximately 50%.  
Guidelines and recommendations established by the Response Assessment in 
Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group recognize the limitations of conventional MRI, and in view 
of the lack of substantial evidence, do not yet advocate any advanced imaging technique 
when MRI features are suggestive, but equivocal, for recurrence of brain metastases 
(Wen, 2010; Lin, 2015). The management of patients with MRI findings suggestive, but 
equivocal, for recurrent brain metastases includes clinical monitoring or biopsy sampling 
(Lin, 2015). Close clinical monitoring with repeat imaging may be performed in the hope that 
scan appearance resolves over time, but this is at the expense of delayed therapeutic decision 
making. Further, neurosurgical biopsy sampling is an invasive procedure that carries the 
associated risk of further deteriorating quality-of-life for patients already undergoing 
aggressive treatment (of their primary cancer) (Verma, 2013).
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines list advanced MRI scans 
(magnetic resonance [MR] spectroscopy, MR perfusion) and PET imaging as potentially 
useful techniques in differentiating tumor from treatment effect (NCCN, 2019); however, the 
availability, acquisition, processing, interpretation and, therefore, diagnostic performance of 
advanced MRI scans vary considerably (Zhang, 2017). In addition, the only PET imaging 
agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in brain tumor 
imaging is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), which has notable limitations. Use of 18F-FDG in 
brain tumor imaging is limited in sensitivity and specificity, as differentiation of tumor from 
non-tumorous tissue is often difficult due to the high metabolic rate of normal brain 
parenchyma and inflammatory tissue (Galldiks, 2019). 18F-FDG uptake in low-grade tumors 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 24 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
can be similar to that in normal grey matter. The sensitivity of detection of lesions is further 
decreased by the high variance of 18F-FDG uptake and its heterogeneity within a single tumor 
(Heiss, 2014). 
Given this area of great diagnostic unmet need, accurate imaging to differentiate disease 
recurrence from treatment-related changes is valuable for several reasons: 
 Identifying treatment-related changes is important to avoid unneeded treatment 
(e.g., surgery) and erroneously premature termination of potentially effective 
treatment (Walker, 2014). 
 Accurate scans can inform the management decision of cessation of non-effective 
treatments, to minimize morbidity from treatment side effects (Galldiks, 2019) 
and reduce the economic burden. 
 Timely diagnosis of true recurrence will allow prompt stratification of patients to 
further therapies (Galldiks, 2019), which may maximize therapeutic benefit and 
clinical outcome. 
 Given the high morbidity and mortality of patients with brain metastases and, 
therefore, the need for high quality clinical research, such imaging will be pivotal 
in determining suitability for clinical trial entry, and accurate characterization of 
investigational therapeutic efficacy (Lin, 2015). This particular need for certainty 
on optimal clinical trial endpoints has been recognized by the FDA and National 
Brain Tumor Society (NBTS), leading to recent joint efforts to stimulate much 
needed research and development in this area (FDA/NBTS, 2019). 
 Aiding the physician to risk-stratify continuation of a therapeutic regimen (where 
treatment-related changes can be confidently diagnosed). This is of particular 
value in the context of a treatment with a significant side effect profile. 
Limited clinical research has been conducted with other amino acid PET tracers in brain 
metastases, possibly in part due to their highly limited availability in the US. Studies of brain 
metastases with amino acid PET tracers 18F-fluoro-ethyltyrosine (18F-FET), 
18F-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) and 11C-methionine have all been 
described, with demonstration of increased tracer uptake and sensitivities of 79% to 95%, 
specificities of 84% to 93% for the detection of brain metastases where MRI is suggestive of 
recurrent disease (Terakawa, 2008; Galldiks, 2012; Lizarraga, 2014; Cicone, 2015; 
Minamimoto, 2015; Romagna, 2016; Ceccon, 2017). In recent recommendations by the 
RANO working group, amino acid PET was recommended as useful in distinguishing 
post-therapeutic reactive changes following radiotherapy from recurrent brain metastases 
(Galldiks, 2019). This was based on review of Level 2 evidence on 18F-FET, 18F-FDOPA and 
11C-methionine. Transport mechanisms of these tracers have overlap with 18F-fluciclovine, in 
that these are predominantly LAT1-mediated. Furthermore, known cross-affinity for various 
amino acids between the 2 transporters support the expectation for 18F-fluciclovine to 
demonstrate comparable performance in brain metastases, akin to other amino acid PET 
tracers and known 18F-fluciclovine imaging characteristics in glioma. Thus, the investigation 
of 18F-fluciclovine in the imaging of brain metastases is of considerable clinical relevance, 
particularly when considering promising results from the aforementioned IITs of 
18F-fluciclovine in brain metastases.
Amongst the previously cited studies using 18F-FET, 18F-FDOPA and 11C-methionine, 
different interpretation criteria for optimum detection of disease recurrence have been 
reported. Furthermore, these criteria have been based on different methods of quantifying 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 25 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
PET tracer uptake, and in the case of 18F-FET, incorporate the interpretation of dynamic scan 
data (time-activity curves). Therefore, existing heterogeneous data on optimum image 
interpretation criteria in other amino acid PET tracers cannot be directly applied to 
18F-fluciclovine. Within this clinical program, BED is conducting a Phase 2 study 
(BED-FLC-219) designed to define image interpretation criteria.
18F-fluciclovine has a well-established safety profile and a wide distribution network in the 
US where it is routinely used as standard of care (SoC) for imaging in biochemical recurrence
of prostate cancer.
Throughout this study, 18F-fluciclovine PET will be read with standard MRI for anatomical 
reference. Standard MRI sequences performed on study will include contrast enhanced 
T1-weighted, T2-weighted/ FLAIR and diffusion-weighted imaging (Kaufmann, 2020).
The purpose of the current study is to establish the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine 
PET (read with standard MRI for anatomical reference) in detecting recurrent brain 
metastases where MRI is equivocal.
2.1. 
Risk-Benefit Assessment 
2.1.1. 
Benefit
The 18F-fluciclovine PET scans may provide further clinical information regarding the 
subject’s disease status that may not have been appreciated using other standard of care tests. 
If such information arises, this may be considered by the responsible clinician to help direct 
the subject’s management, including guiding any planned neurosurgical intervention. This 
may provide a direct benefit to the subject.
2.1.2.
Risk
The risks from the imaging studies to subjects mainly relate to the intravenous (IV) injection 
and the radiation emitted by the radiopharmaceutical and the computerized tomography (CT) 
transmission scan (when the PET scan is acquired on a PET/CT scanner). There is a potential 
risk of a hypersensitivity reaction requiring the availability of resuscitative equipment and 
personnel. Intravenous injection carries a small risk of infection and hematoma.
The mean effective dose per unit administered activity of 18F-fluciclovine is 22.1
(McParland, 2013). An administered activity of 5 mCi (185 MBq) will result in an effective 
dose of 4.1 mSv. If PET/CT is used, the effective dose due to CT acquisition should be in 
accordance with ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principles. The maximum 
effective dose due to a CT transmission scan will vary from site to site, but as a guide, a dose 
ranging from 0.5 mSv to 2.0 mSv would be expected. Combined with the effective dose from 
18F-fluciclovine (4.1 mSv), the total effective dose of the 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT scan of 
6.1 mSv is in line with other common brain nuclear medicine procedures.  
Due to the risk of radiation exposure, women who are either pregnant or breast feeding are 
excluded from participation. All subjects, male and female, who are not surgically sterilized 
or postmenopausal, must agree to abstain from sexual conduct for 24 hours 
post-18F-fluciclovine injection.   
Image interpretation errors can occur with 18F-fluciclovine PET brain imaging. Physiological
distribution of 18F-fluciclovine does not rule out the presence of recurrent metastasis and 
18F-fluciclovine uptake within a lesion does not confirm the presence of recurrent metastasis. 
18F-fluciclovine uptake is not specific for brain metastases and may occur with other types of 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 26 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
malignancy in or around the brain. There may be uptake in other conditions such as active 
multiple sclerosis, brain abscess, and meningioma. Accordingly, as the responsible clinician 
may consider information from the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan to direct the patient’s 
management, there is a potential risk of additional resections/biopsies including those that are 
ultimately unnecessary. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 27 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
3. 
STUDY OBJECTIVES 
3.1. 
Primary Objective 
The primary objective is:
1. To assess the negative percent agreement (NPA) and positive percent agreement 
(PPA) of 18F-fluciclovine PET in detecting recurrent brain metastases on a 
subject-level.
3.2. 
Secondary Objectives 
The secondary objectives are:
1. To assess other diagnostic performance parameters of 18F-fluciclovine PET in 
detecting recurrent brain metastases on a subject-level. 
2. To assess lesion level diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET in detecting 
recurrent brain metastases.
3. To assess subject-level diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET in detecting 
recurrent brain metastases in different clinical settings. 
4. To evaluate the added clinical usefulness of 18F-fluciclovine PET in evaluation of 
subjects with suspected recurrent brain metastases. 
5. To establish inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of 18F-fluciclovine PET image 
interpretation for detecting recurrent brain metastases. 
6. To assess the safety of 18F-fluciclovine injection in the subject population. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 28 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
4. 
STUDY DESIGN 
4.1. 
Study Overview 
This is a prospective, open label, single arm, single dose study in subjects with solid tumor 
brain metastases previously treated with radiation therapy, designed to establish the 
diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET (read with standard MRI for anatomical 
reference) in detecting recurrent brain metastases where MRI is equivocal.
Subjects with a history of brain metastases previously treated with primary, adjuvant or 
repeat (salvage) radiation therapy, with a recent SoC brain MRI found to be equivocal for 
recurrent brain metastasis, and who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion 
criteria, will be consented and enrolled. The study population will be balanced to represent 
different primary tumor types of any origin, with a minimum of approximately 15% of the 
cohort each with lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma. The number of subjects with lung 
cancer will be capped at approximately 50% of enrolled subjects.  
Investigator will prepare a diagnostic management plan prior to the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan 
and will update the plan following the scan. All eligible subjects will receive an 
18F-fluciclovine PET scan (Visit 2 PET) within 42 days of SoC MRI. Subjects will then 
undergo a repeat study-specific brain MRI scan (Visit 2 On-Study MRI) to be used for 
anatomical reference, ideally on the same day, otherwise 
 days after Visit 2 PET and 
completed before any pre-planned neurosurgical intervention when applicable. A Safety 
Follow-up (Visit 3) 1 to 3 days after IMP injection/PET (Visit 2 PET) will be made for AE 
evaluation by telephone call or in person (if same day as other scheduled SoC appointments). 
AEs occurring from the time of 18F-fluciclovine administration until 1 day post-
18F-fluciclovine administration will be recorded. The Safety Follow-up must be completed 
before the pre-planned SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention, if applicable. Subjects who 
experience an SAE or an AE that persists at Visit 3, will be followed until resolution or 
stabilization of these events. All ongoing follow-up and any further treatment will be in 
accordance with SoC.
As MRI is not specific for tumor recurrence in this setting, current clinical practice is mainly 
focused on close clinical follow-up to determine the presence of recurrence. Alternatively, 
biopsy or direct neurosurgical intervention of the abnormality may be performed. This study 
will utilize all available diagnostic and follow-up clinical data to establish the underlying 
diagnosis.  The planned diagnostic method will be recorded at Screening and assessed for any 
changes following 18F-fluciclovine PET scan.
If biopsy/neurosurgical intervention has been pre-planned per SoC, the Visit 2 PET will be 
organized to take place a minimum of 1 day and maximum of 21 days before pre-planned 
SoC biopsy or neurosurgical intervention. 
On-site investigators will prospectively annotate and measure the ‘reference lesion’ on a 
post-radiation treatment MRI scan and on the pre-study SoC MRI scan to confirm eligibility.  
The ‘reference lesion’ is defined as the lesion which is: 
a. Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI (according to inclusion criterion 
#7, see Section 6.2).  
b. Intended for SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention procedure (if planned). If 
>1 lesion is intended for biopsy/intervention, the largest of these lesions will be 
the reference lesion.  

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 29 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
c.
Where clinical follow-up is planned, the largest of all equivocal lesions (if >1 is 
present) will be the reference lesion.  
If >1 equivocal lesion is under evaluation as SoC, the on-site investigator will also annotate 
‘other equivocal lesions’ on the pre-study SoC MRI scan, defined as follows:
a. Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI (according to the same 
radiological criteria for a reference lesion per inclusion criterion #7, see 
Section 6.2). 
b. Where SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention procedure is planned, these are the 
other equivocal lesions pre-planned for biopsy/intervention.
c. Where SoC clinical follow-up is planned, these are the other equivocal lesions 
pre-planned for SoC clinical follow-up. 
The on-site investigator will also review the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan to identify potential 
additional lesions, not previously reported on SoC MRI (termed ‘additional PET lesions’). 
Additional PET lesions should be annotated only where judged suggestive of brain 
metastasis, warranting confirmation by clinical follow-up, biopsy or resection, according to 
SoC practice. Undertaking biopsy/resection of additional PET lesion(s) identified on the 
18F-fluciclovine PET scan is at the discretion of on-site investigators. Moreover, an additional 
PET lesion should be discrete and spatially separate from known, pre-existing lesions. In 
particular, the following should not be annotated as Additional PET lesions: known pre-
existing non-progressive lesions (considered at site level as stable or partially responding), 
18F-fluciclovine activity contiguous with a known lesion (previously annotated or otherwise) 
and apparently incongruent with the lesion’s outline on correlating MRI, particularly where 
this may be reasonably explained by image registration.
For subjects due for pre-planned SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention, the procedure will 
be at Visit 4. The subject will receive post-procedural management per institutional SoC. All 
ongoing follow-up and any further treatment will be in accordance with SoC. Samples 
obtained during this Visit 4 will be subject to central histopathological evaluation.    
As with subjects who undergo pre-planned SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention, subjects 
pre-planned for clinical follow-up to evaluate the equivocal lesions will undergo follow-up 
performed as SoC per local practice. This is anticipated to vary between subjects.  
The final visit for each subject, including subjects who had undergone pre-planned SoC 
biopsy/neurosurgical intervention, will usually be the Month-6 Follow-up at Visit 5. For 
study purposes, clinical data accrued during SoC clinical follow-up, pertaining to the ongoing 
assessment, eventual confirmation of diagnosis, and treatment of the lesions, will be 
collected. The data will comprise brain imaging scans, treatment regimens, histopathological 
reports and mortality status. The period of data accrual will be up to 6 months following 
18F-fluciclovine PET, or death, whichever comes first. Subjects still considered equivocal at 
site level at Month 6 (Visit 5) will undergo a study MRI. 
With the exception of PET scans, the clinical follow-up data and, where applicable, central 
histopathology results, will be reviewed by a Central Truth Panel (CTP) to assign a final
diagnosis to each lesion, and form the Standard of Reference (SoR). Separately, 
18F-fluciclovine PET scans will be centrally read in a blinded image evaluation (BIE), using 
image interpretation criteria established from the separate Phase 2 study (BED-FLC-219). 
Diagnostic performance primary and secondary endpoints will then be derived from BIE scan 
reads matched against SoR. Subject-level SoR will be defined by CTP diagnosis of the 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 30 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
reference lesion. Lesion-level SoT will be defined by CTP diagnosis of all lesions (reference 
lesions, other equivocal lesions, additional PET lesions). 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 31 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
5. 
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 
5.1. 
Primary Efficacy Endpoint 
1. Subject-level NPA and PPA (equivalent to specificity and sensitivity, respectively) of 
18F-fluciclovine PET in detecting recurrent brain metastases.
5.2.
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
1. Subject-level positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 
18F-fluciclovine PET for detecting recurrent brain metastases.
2. Lesion-level PPA, NPA, PPV and NPV of 18F-fluciclovine PET for detecting 
recurrent brain metastases.
3. Sub-group analyses of subject-level PPA, NPA, PPV and NPV of 18F-fluciclovine 
PET, according to primary tumor type and concurrent immunotherapy. 
4. Clinical usefulness: 
a. Number of days taken by the site to establish presence/absence of metastasis by 
clinical follow-up. 
b. Proportion of subjects with additional metastases identified on 18F-fluciclovine 
PET in addition to standard of care brain MRI.
c. Proportion of subjects whose prospective diagnostic management plan changes 
following 18F-fluciclovine PET. 
5. Inter-reader and intra-reader agreement statistics (kappa coefficient). 
6. Treatment-emergent adverse events following 18F-fluciclovine injection in the subject 
population.
5.3. 
Safety Evaluations 
Safety will be assessed from the time of 18F-fluciclovine administration until 1 day 
post-18F-fluciclovine administration based on reported serious and non-serious AEs (SAEs 
and AEs, respectively). 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 32 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
6. 
SUBJECT SELECTION 
6.1. 
Study Population 
Subjects with solid tumor brain metastases previously treated with radiation therapy who 
meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be eligible for participation in this study.  
6.2.
Inclusion Criteria
1. 
 
2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. 
3. Subject or subject’s Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) is willing and able to 
provide written informed consent. 
4. Previous history of solid tumor brain metastasis of any origin. 
5. Histopathological confirmation of the primary solid tumor or a metastatic site within 
4 years of Screening (Visit 1). Cancer of unknown primary is excluded. 
6. Previous radiation therapy of brain metastatic lesion(s) completed at least 8 weeks 
before Screening. Form of radiotherapy may include stereotactic radiosurgery or 
whole brain radiotherapy, previously delivered as primary (initial) treatment, in the 
adjuvant setting (e.g., post-surgery), salvage setting (repeat radiation therapy), in or 
out of the context of previous or concurrent systemic treatments.
7. A reference lesion considered by the site investigator to be equivocal for recurrent 
brain metastasis, as determined by a recent* SoC MRI brain scan**, measuring 
in longest diameter on contrast-enhanced MRI, and meeting one of the following 
radiological criteria: 
a. 
in the longest diameter of the reference lesion on 
contrast-enhanced MRI relative to nadir***, where the longest diameter at nadir is 
10mm
b. 
contrast-enhanced MRI relative to nadir, where the longest diameter at nadir is 
<10mm 
c. a contrast enhancing lesion at site of previous radiotherapy following complete 
lesion response (CLR, defined as disappearance of the irradiated contrast 
enhancing lesion on contrast-enhanced MRI).
*SoC MRI brain scan must be completed within no more than 42 days before study 
PET scan.
**The SoC MRI brain scan must consist of conventional sequences, defined as:
 T1-weighted without and with contrast enhancement, and 
FLAIR and/or T2-weighted.  
If SoC also includes advanced/investigational MRI sequences, including but 
not limited to perfusion, spectroscopy, diffusion weighted imaging, and 
susceptibility weighted imaging, trial entry is permitted as long as the other 
inclusion criteria are met.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 33 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
***Nadir is defined as the smallest size after radiotherapy, measured by single longest 
diameter on an available contrast-enhanced MRI.
8. Subject requires further confirmatory diagnostic procedures to confirm brain MRI 
findings and is planned for:
a. Biopsy or neurosurgical intervention (i.e., craniotomy, laser interstitial thermal 
therapy where peri-procedural biopsy is planned) as SoC, or
b. Clinical follow-up as SoC.  
9. Females of child-bearing potential (CBP) to have negative pregnancy test (urine) 
before on-study 18F-fluciclovine PET scan.
Note: Women of CBP are defined as sexually mature women without prior 
hysterectomy or who have had any evidence of menses in the past 12 months. 
However, women who have been amenorrheic for 12 or more months are still 
considered to be of childbearing potential if the amenorrhea is possibly due to 
prior chemotherapy, anti-estrogens, or ovarian suppression. 
10. All subjects, male and female, who are not surgically sterilized or postmenopausal as 
defined above, must agree to abstain from sexual conduct for 24 hours 
post-18F-fluciclovine injection.
6.3. 
Exclusion Criteria 
1. Pregnant or breastfeeding during participation in the study, or, where applicable, 
unwilling to abstain from sexual conduct for 24 hours post-18F-fluciclovine injection.
2. Subjects with any medical condition or circumstance that the investigator believes 
may confound the data collected.
3. Subjects with active hematological malignancy or cancer of unknown primary.
4. Subject has received, or is scheduled to receive, another IMP from 1 month or within 
5 half-lives of the other IMP (whichever is shorter) before 18F-fluciclovine injection to 
the completion of Visit 3.*
*Subjects receiving concurrent systemic therapies, including immunotherapies, are 
permitted for study entry as long as the concurrent therapy is not an IMP. 
5. Known contraindications to a contrast-enhanced MRI procedure.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 34 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
7. 
CONCURRENT MEDICATIONS 
All concurrent medications are allowed except for treatments noted in the exclusion criteria 
(Section 6.3) and as noted in the prohibited medications section below. 
7.1.
Allowed Medications and Treatments
Standard therapy for solid tumor brain metastases (e.g., systemic therapies, including 
immunotherapies) is allowed except for treatments noted in the exclusion criteria described 
above and as noted in the prohibited medications section below.
7.2.
Prohibited Medications and Treatments
The following medications are prohibited during the study and administration will be 
considered a protocol violation: 
 any concurrent therapy that is an IMP, prohibited from 1 month or within 5 
half-lives of the other IMP (whichever is shorter) before 18F-fluciclovine injection 
to the completion of Visit 3. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 36 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
8.7. 
Dispensing 
When the study site receives the dose, both prior to and after administration, the activity in 
the syringe will be measured using an appropriate dose calibrator. Should the activity be less 
than 148 MBq (4 mCi) or the volume required exceed 5 mL of undiluted material or the 
administration be after the labeled expiration time, the scan should not be performed.
Additional details for handling the IMP are provided in the Pharmacy Manual. 
8.8.
Administration Instructions 
Position the subject supine, with arms alongside the body and the head stabilized 
appropriately. The entire brain, including the cerebellum, should be in the field of view. A 
venous cannula will be inserted, and the subject will receive an administered activity of 
185 MBq (5 mCi) ± 20% of 18F-fluciclovine. The 18F-fluciclovine will be administered as an 
IV bolus injection followed by a 10 mL flush of normal saline solution.
Additional details are provided in the Imaging Acquisition Standards.  
8.9. 
Storage 
The shelf-life of 18F-fluciclovine injection is up to 10 hours from the end of production and 
the product must not be administered beyond this limit. 18F-fluciclovine should be stored at 
 
All non-radioactive containers (shielding, transport cans) must be returned to the 
manufacturing site. Shipping containers that are radioactive must be decontaminated or 
allowed to decay prior to return to the manufacturing site. Used product syringes and other 
radioactive materials must be destroyed at either the study site or another designated facility. 
Waste must be disposed of according to national and local regulations for radioactive 
material. 
Precautions for the safe handling of radioactive materials should be observed. 
Additional details are provided in the Pharmacy Manual. 
8.10.
Study Drug Accountability
An accurate and current accounting of the dispensing and disposal of study drug for each 
subject will be recorded on the Investigational Drug Accountability Record. These records 
will be maintained at the radiopharmacy, hot lab or nuclear medicine department responsible 
for receipt and dispensation of study drug. Records should include at a minimum:
Dates of receipt, lot number and quantities received from Sponsor or designee;
Dates, subject numbers, and amount of 18F-fluciclovine dispensed for 
administration to specific subjects, including administered dose activity; 
 If applicable, for any unused IMP, dates, lot numbers, and reason dose was not 
administered.
The investigator is responsible for ensuring that study drug is administered only to subjects 
included in this study in accordance with the study protocol. 
Throughout the study, drug accountability will be performed by appropriate Sponsor 
representative(s) and when appropriate, reconciliation will be performed. Additional details 
are provided in the Pharmacy Manual. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 37 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
8.11. 
Measures of Treatment Compliance 
Not Applicable. This is a single dose study, administered by site staff. 
8.12.
End Of Trial
Subjects will be followed to 6 months per SoC. Month-6 Follow-up data abstraction 
(6 months following 18F-fluciclovine PET) will be conducted in order to collect diagnostic, 
treatment, and response information which will be provided to a CTP for review. Subjects 
whose reference or other equivocal lesion(s) continue to be considered equivocal at site level 
at Visit 5 / Month 6 will undergo a study MRI.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 38 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
9. 
STUDY PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 
A schedule of events representing the required study procedures to be performed for the 
duration of the study is provided in Table 1.  
Prior to conducting any study-related activities, written informed consent (and assent, if 
applicable) including Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) 
authorization must be signed and dated by the subject or LAR (Section 17.3).

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023
 
 
 
 
 
Page 39 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
Table 1. Schedule of Study Procedures 
 
Day -42 to -1 
SoC MRI 
Visit 1 
Day -28 to -1 
Screening 
Visit 2 
Day 1 
IMP + PET 
Visit 2  
Day 1 to 4 
On-Study MRI 
Visit 3
Day 2 to 4 
Safety  
Follow-Up 
Phone Call
Visit 4 
Day 2 to 22 SoC 
Biopsy / 
Neurosurgical 
Intervention  
(if applicable)
Visit 5
Month 6 
(183 days ± 
14 days) 
Follow-up 
 
Before Visit 1 
Screening
Within 28 to 1 
day before Visit 2 
Day 1
1 to 21 days before 
SoC optional 
Biopsy / 
Neurosurgical 
Intervention Visit 4 
Day 3
Day of  
18F-fluciclovine 
injection or up to  
3 days after
1 to 3 days after  
18F-fluciclovine 
injection, before 
optional SoC 
Biopsy 
/Neurosurgical 
Intervention 
(if applicable)
If applicable, at 
time of  
pre-planned SoC 
Biopsy / 
Neurosurgical 
Intervention and 
after Visit 2 MRI 
and Visit 3 
Follow-Up
Through 6 months 
after 
18F-fluciclovine 
PET
SoC MRI
X
Informed Consent
X
Confirm inclusion/exclusion 
criteria
X
X
Demographics a
X
Baseline Characteristics b
X
Medical / Disease History c
X
X
ECOG Performance Status d
X
Concomitant Medications
X
X
X
Vital Signs e
X
Pregnancy Test (Urine) f
X
X
Diagnostic Management Plan
X
X
Order 18F-fluciclovine dose
X
Eligibility Review g
X
18F-fluciclovine Injection
X
Dynamic PET Brain Scan
X
Adverse Events
X
X
On-Study MRI Brain Scan
X
X h
Annotate Reference Lesion 
on SoC MRI Brain Scan 
X
Annotate other equivocal 
lesions (if applicable) i
X

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023
 
 
 
 
 
Page 40 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
Table 1. Schedule of Study Procedures 
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IMP, investigational medicinal product; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; SoC, 
standard of care. 
a Demographic information recorded at Screening will include age, sex, race and ethnicity. 
b Baseline assessments will include pre-scan body weight and height. Pre-scan body weight and height will be collected at Visit 2.
c Treatment history for previous cancer to include previous treatments for brain metastases and previous cancer treatments for primary tumor. Any changes to the subject’s 
medical condition between Screening (Visit 1) and the start of 18F-fluciclovine administration (Visit 2) should be recorded as updated medical history.
d A standard of care ECOG assessment may be recorded as the Screening ECOG if the assessment was performed within 28 days of Screening.
 
Day -42 to -1 
SoC MRI 
Visit 1 
Day -28 to -1 
Screening 
Visit 2 
Day 1 
IMP + PET 
Visit 2  
Day 1 to 4 
On-Study MRI 
Visit 3
Day 2 to 4 
Safety  
Follow-Up 
Phone Call
Visit 4 
Day 2 to 22 SoC 
Biopsy / 
Neurosurgical 
Intervention  
(if applicable)
Visit 5
Month 6 
(183 days ± 
14 days) 
Follow-up 
 
Before Visit 1 
Screening
Within 28 to 1 
day before Visit 2 
Day 1
1 to 21 days before 
SoC optional 
Biopsy / 
Neurosurgical 
Intervention Visit 4 
Day 3
Day of  
18F-fluciclovine 
injection or up to  
3 days after
1 to 3 days after  
18F-fluciclovine 
injection, before 
optional SoC 
Biopsy 
/Neurosurgical 
Intervention 
(if applicable)
If applicable, at 
time of  
pre-planned SoC 
Biopsy / 
Neurosurgical 
Intervention and 
after Visit 2 MRI 
and Visit 3 
Follow-Up
Through 6 months 
after 
18F-fluciclovine 
PET
Identify and annotate 
additional PET lesions (i.e. 
potential additional lesions 
not previously reported on 
SoC MRI [if applicable]) j 
X 
 
 
Safety Follow-up Phone Call 
X 
SoC Biopsy/Neurosurgical 
Intervention 
 
 
 
 
X
 
Document Neurosurgical 
Procedure
X
Record local histopathology 
results and send specimens to 
central histopathology 
laboratory
X
Neurological Deterioration 
Assessment
X
Clinical Follow-Up / Data 
abstraction k
X

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023
 
 
 
 
 
Page 41 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
e Vital signs (body temperature, blood pressure, pulse and respirations) will be collected after resting for at least 5 minutes before IMP injection, and after resting for at least 
5 minutes following PET scan. 
f Females of childbearing potential.
g Eligibility review to include collection and review of prior post-treatment MRI brain scans as needed to confirm eligibility. Prior post-treatment MRI brain scans and 
current SoC MRI images to be uploaded to central imaging core lab. 
h  A study MRI will be performed for any subject whose reference or other equivocal lesion(s) is/are still considered equivocal at site level at Visit 5 / Month 6 unless a SoC 
MRI was performed within the preceding 3 weeks. 
i  If >1 equivocal lesion is under evaluation as SoC, the on-site investigator will also annotate ‘other equivocal lesions’ on the Visit 2 On-Study MRI brain scan, defined as 
follows: 
a) Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI (according to the same radiological criteria for a reference lesion per inclusion criterion #7). 
b) Where SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention procedure is planned, these are the other equivocal lesions pre-planned for biopsy/intervention. 
c) Where SoC clinical follow-up is planned, these are the other equivocal lesions pre-planned for SoC clinical follow-up. 
j  Additional PET lesions are potential additional lesions identified by the on-site investigator on 18F-fluciclovine PET scan, not previously reported on SoC MRI, and judged 
to be suggestive of brain metastasis, warranting confirmation by clinical follow-up, biopsy or resection according to SoC.  
k Relevant clinical and imaging data will be uploaded for up to 6 months following 18F-fluciclovine PET scan.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 42 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
9.1. 
Clinical Assessments 
9.1.1.
Concomitant Medications
All concomitant medication and concurrent therapies will be documented at Screening 
(Visit 1), at IMP administration (Visit 2) and at the post-treatment Safety Follow-up phone 
call (Visit 3), and at early termination when applicable.  In addition to recording all 
concomitant medications as described, treatments and therapies for the brain lesion(s) and 
primary tumor will be recorded through Month 6 (Visit 5) as described in Section 9.1.8. 
Dose, route, frequency of administration, and indication for administration and dates of 
medication will be captured. 
9.1.2. 
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics  
Demographic information recorded at Screening will include age, sex, race and ethnicity. 
Baseline assessments of pre-scan body weight and height will be collected at Visit 2.  
9.1.3. 
ECOG Performance Status 
Conduct ECOG Performance Status assessment at Screening (Visit 1) or record a standard of 
care ECOG Performance Status if the assessment was performed within 28 days prior to 
Screening (Visit 1) (see Appendix 1). 
9.1.4. 
Medical History  
Record medical and disease history at Screening (Visit 1). Include history for previous brain 
metastases and brain metastases treatments, diagnosis of primary tumor and previous cancer 
treatments for primary tumor, and any other previous cancers, as applicable. Brain metastases 
and primary tumor histories should include dates of initial diagnosis, initial tumor stage, dates 
and type of definitive therapy and adjuvant treatment (if given). Any changes to the subject’s 
medical condition between Screening (Visit 1) and the start of 18F-fluciclovine administration 
(Visit 2) should be recorded as updated medical history. 
9.1.5. 
Imaging Studies
Sites will be instructed to submit historic SoC imaging data required to confirm eligibility. 
Submitted MRI scans should confirm the reference lesion criteria outlined in Section 6.2. 
Therefore, these should be the MRI scan confirming nadir or showing complete response, the 
current SoC MRI brain scan performed before Screening (Visit 1), and may include the 
pre-treatment MRI if available. Sites will annotate and measure the reference lesion and other 
equivocal lesions on the current SoC MRI brain scan using the imaging core lab study 
imaging platform.
The reference lesion is defined as the lesion which is:
a.
Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI (according to inclusion criterion 
#7, see Section 6.2). 
b. Intended for SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention procedure (if planned). If >1 
lesion is intended for biopsy/intervention, the largest of these lesions will be the 
reference lesion. 
c.
Where clinical follow-up is planned, the largest of all equivocal lesions (if >1 is 
present) will be the reference lesion. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 43 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
If >1 equivocal lesion is under evaluation as SoC, the on-site investigator will also annotate 
‘other equivocal lesions’ on the pre-study SoC MRI brain scan, defined as follows: 
a. Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI (according to the same 
radiological criteria for a reference lesion per inclusion criterion #7, see 
Section 6.2). 
b. Where SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention procedure is planned, these are the 
other equivocal lesions pre-planned for biopsy/intervention. 
c. Where SoC clinical follow-up is planned, these are the other equivocal lesions 
pre-planned for SoC clinical follow-up. 
Sites will perform and upload a 18F-fluciclovine PET brain scan on Day 1 (Visit 2), and an 
on-study MRI brain scan performed 0 to 3 days after the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan (Visit 2). 
The site investigator will review the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan to identify potential additional 
lesions, not previously reported on SoC MRI (termed ‘additional PET lesions’). Additional 
PET lesions should be annotated only where judged suggestive of brain metastasis, 
warranting confirmation by clinical follow-up, biopsy or resection, according to SoC practice. 
Moreover, an additional PET lesion should be discrete and spatially separate from known, 
pre-existing lesions. In particular, the following should not be annotated as Additional PET 
lesions: known pre-existing non-progressive lesions (considered at site level as stable or 
partially responding), 18F-fluciclovine activity contiguous with a known lesion (previously 
annotated or otherwise) and apparently incongruent with the lesion’s outline on correlating 
MRI, particularly where this may be reasonably explained by image registration.
The investigator will then annotate the additional PET lesions on the 18F-fluciclovine PET 
scan using the imaging core lab study imaging platform. The site investigator will also 
confirm the sites of the reference and other equivocal lesions on the Visit 2 scans. 
For each annotated lesion, a lesion identifier will be automatically created and assigned by 
the imaging core lab study imaging platform. For each annotated lesion, the site will also be 
required to define the anatomical location.
Subjects whose reference or other equivocal lesion(s) continue to be considered at the 
site-level to be equivocal for brain metastasis at Month 6 (Visit 5) will have a final research 
MRI unless an SoC MRI was performed within the prior 3 weeks.
9.1.5.1.
18F-fluciclovine PET Scan
Dynamic PET/CT or PET/MRI scan of the brain to be performed at Visit 2 following 
18F-fluciclovine injection. If the PET scan is performed on a PET/CT scanner, a CT scan of 
the brain will also be performed for attenuation correction. Site investigator will review the 
18F-fluciclovine PET scan to identify potential additional PET lesions (this will be done with 
the Visit 2 MRI scan for anatomical reference). The PET scan will be uploaded to the central 
imaging core laboratory by the site investigator/site staff. The selected PET scanner must be 
qualified by the study management team prior to any imaging studies. Full details on the 
imaging protocol are provided in the Imaging Acquisition Standards. 
9.1.5.2.
On-Study MRI
Throughout this study, 18F-fluciclovine PET will be read with standard MRI for anatomical 
reference. Therefore, all subjects will receive an on-study, study-specific brain MRI scan at 
Visit 2, ideally on the same d
-study 
MRI will consist of MRI sequences per the minimum standard consensus recommendations 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 44 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases 
(BTIP-BM) (Kaufmann, 2020).
These will include:
 T1-weighted MRI without and with contrast enhancement, 
FLAIR and/or T2-weighted MRI, and
Diffusion-weighted imaging.
On-study MRI brain scans will be uploaded to the central imaging core laboratory by the site 
investigator/site staff. In addition to reviewing the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan to identify 
potential additional PET lesions, on the Visit 2 MRI, the site investigator will confirm the 
sites of the reference and other equivocal lesions initially defined on the SoC MRI. Full 
details on the imaging protocol are provided in the Imaging Acquisition Standards. If 
available, scans acquired on a PET/MRI are allowed. 
A final on-study MRI will be performed at Visit 5 (Month 6) only for any surviving subject 
whose reference or other equivocal lesion(s) remain equivocal at site level, unless an SoC 
MRI was performed within the preceding 3 weeks. 
9.1.6. 
Vital Signs 
Vital signs, including body temperature, blood pressure, pulse and respirations, will be 
collected at Visit 2 (IMP injection + PET) after resting for at least 5 minutes before IMP 
injection and after resting for at least 5 minutes following PET scan. The vital signs should be 
collected between 5 to 60 minutes before and after the PET scan. 
9.1.7. 
SoC Biopsy/Neurosurgical Intervention 
Biopsy/resection of the reference / other equivocal lesions is to take place as planned for SoC. 
Neurosurgical intervention procedures include craniotomy and laser interstitial thermal 
therapy (LITT) where peri-procedural biopsy is performed. Biopsy/surgical resection of any 
additional PET lesions may also be performed if clinically applicable. Where a craniotomy is 
planned, en bloc resection is to be performed where possible. Where en bloc resection is not 
possible, the surgeon should try and send as much of the sample as possible to enable optimal 
histopathology assessment. Care should be taken to follow the Sample Handling Laboratory 
Manual to label all samples sent to the site pathology laboratory, and to reflect the locations 
sampled and lesion identifiers assigned by the imaging core lab study imaging platform. 
The site pathology laboratory will perform histopathology analysis on lesion samples per SoC 
and will send a representative set of specimens to the central laboratory for analysis. Refer to 
the Sample Handling Laboratory Manual.   
9.1.8. 
Clinical Follow-Up / Data Abstraction 
Clinical follow-up will be performed as SoC per local practice and is anticipated to vary 
between subjects. For study purposes, clinical data accrued during the period of clinical 
follow-up, pertaining to the ongoing assessment, eventual confirmation of diagnosis, and 
treatment of the lesions, will be collected. The data will comprise of brain imaging scans, 
treatment regimens, histopathological reports and mortality status, see Table 1. Treatment 
regimens will pertain to treatments and therapies for the brain lesion(s) and primary tumor. 
These will include and are not limited to systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, 
immunotherapy and corticosteroids; and localized therapies such as radiotherapy, LITT and 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 45 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
craniotomy, see Section 9.1.1. The period of data accrual will be up to 6 months following 
18F-fluciclovine PET, or death, whichever comes first. 
At this visit, an assessment will be performed to evaluate if the patient had experienced 
neurological deterioration potentially related to progression of brain metastases over the 
study period. This assessment will be performed by a site investigator who is a 
board-certified neuro-oncologist, radiation oncologist, medical oncologist or neurosurgeon. 
As with the other items at this Visit, this assessment will be based on an investigator review 
of the subject medical record and will take place in the physical absence of the subject.
Based on a review of the subject medical record at the Month 6 Follow-Up visit, the 
investigator will ascertain if the patient had demonstrated neurological deterioration over the 
6-month period. This must be evidenced by one of the following as assessed by the 
investigator:   
1. Notable clinical deterioration corresponding to a significant decline in Karnofsky 
Performance Status: 
a. 
 
b. 
or 
c. 
2. New or persistent/worsening focal neurological deficit with neuro-anatomical 
correlation to the site of the reference lesion 
If one of the criteria are met, the investigator must also confirm that this impairment: 
 Lasted for at least 7 days, and 
 Was not attributable to co-morbid events, treatment-related toxicity, changes in 
corticosteroid dose or progression of systemic disease, and
 Was not altered by therapies for radiation necrosis 
If none of the criteria are met (i.e., assessed as no neurological deterioration potentially 
related to brain metastases), the date of the most recent clinical record to the time of 
assessment (e.g., a clinical record at 4 weeks prior to Visit 5), which supports the 
investigator’s assessment, should be recorded.
Results of this assessment of neurological deterioration will be used to support diagnostic 
evaluation at Month 6. 
9.2. 
Clinical Laboratory Measurements 
9.2.1. 
Pregnancy Test 
A human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) urine pregnancy test will be obtained from female 
subjects who are of childbearing age prior to their participation in the study at Screening, and 
again on Visit 2 before IMP administration (or on the day prior to IMP administration). 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 46 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
10. 
EVALUATIONS BY VISIT 
10.1. 
Visit 1 –Screening  
Screening to take place following SoC MRI brain scan and up to 28 days before Visit 2. 
Visit 1 – Screening may be performed at Day -1 (1 day prior to Visit 2 PET scan) only if 
next-day delivery of the 18F-fluciclovine dose is confirmed by the site. 
1. Review the study with the subject (subject’s LAR) and obtain written informed 
consent and HIPAA authorization and assent, if appropriate. 
2. Assign the subject a unique subject number. 
3. Record demographic data. 
4. Record medical / disease history.
5. Record concomitant medications. 
6. Record histopathological confirmation of the primary tumor or a metastatic site within 
4 years of Screening. 
7. Record previous cancer treatments for primary tumor (and other previous cancers, if 
applicable). 
8. Record previous diagnoses and treatments for brain metastases. 
9. Collect and review prior pre-treatment (if available), post-treatment and current SoC 
MRI brain scans as needed for the investigator to confirm eligibility. Upload MRI 
images to the central imaging core laboratory and annotate reference lesion, measure 
reference lesion, and annotate other equivocal lesions. 
10. Record or assess ECOG performance status. A standard of care ECOG assessment 
may be recorded as the Screening ECOG if the assessment was performed within 
28 days of Screening.
11. Perform urine HCG pregnancy test (female subjects of child-bearing potential only). 
12. Confirm eligibility against the inclusion / exclusion criteria. 
13. Investigator records the prospective Diagnostic Management Plan as noted following 
SoC MRI.
14. Schedule 18F-fluciclovine PET scan and order IMP for delivery on day of PET scan.
15. Schedule subject for Visit 2 (IMP + PET) to occur within 42 days of the SoC MRI, 
and provide the subject with 18F-fluciclovine PET scan preparation instructions (see 
Section 11.1). 
The reference lesion is defined as the lesion which is:
a.
Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI (according to inclusion criterion 
#7, see Section 6.2).  
b. Intended for SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention procedure (if planned). If >1 
lesion is intended for biopsy/intervention, the largest of these lesions will be the 
reference lesion. 
c. Where clinical follow-up is planned, the largest of all equivocal lesions (if >1 is 
present) will be the reference lesion.  

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 47 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
If >1 equivocal lesion is under evaluation as SoC, the on-site investigator will also annotate 
‘other equivocal lesions’ on the SoC MRI brain scan, defined as follows: 
a.
Equivocal for recurrent metastasis on SoC MRI (according to the same 
radiological criteria for a reference lesion per inclusion criterion #7, see 
Section 6.2). 
b. Where SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention procedure is planned, these are the 
other equivocal lesions pre-planned for biopsy/intervention. 
c.
Where SoC clinical follow-up is planned, these are the other equivocal lesions 
pre-planned for SoC clinical follow-up. 
10.2. 
Visit 2 - Day 1: IMP Administration and Dynamic PET Scan (1 to 
28 days after Screening) 
At Visit 2-Day 1, the following activities will be performed:
1. The subject will prepare for the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan according to preparation 
instructions (see Section 11.1).
2. Record any changes in concomitant medications and medical history since Screening 
(Visit 1).
3. Perform urine HCG pregnancy test (female subjects of child-bearing potential only) 
unless performed 1 day prior to IMP administration. 
4. Confirm eligibility against the inclusion / exclusion criteria. 
5. Perform assessment of vital signs with the subject resting at least 5 minutes prior to 
IMP administration. The vital signs should be collected between 5 to 60 minutes 
before the PET scan. 
6. IMP + PET: Administer 18F-fluciclovine injection, followed by a dynamic PET scan 
of the brain. If the PET scan is performed on a PET/CT scanner, a CT scan of the 
brain will also be performed for attenuation correction. 
7. Monitor and record any adverse events.
8. Perform assessment of vital signs with subject resting at least 5 minutes after PET 
scan. The vital signs should be collected between 5 to 60 minutes after the PET scan.
9. Upload 18F-fluciclovine PET brain scan to central imaging core laboratory. 
10. Review of 18F-fluciclovine PET brain scan by the site investigator to identify potential 
additional PET lesions will be performed with the Visit 2 MRI scan (for anatomical 
reference).  
11. Investigator updates Diagnostic Management Plan following review of 
18F-fluciclovine PET brain scan.
10.3. 
Visit 2 – Day 1 or up to 3 days after 18F-fluciclovine 
Administration: On-Study MRI Brain Scan 
Visit 2 on-study MRI brain scan should take place on the same day as the 18F-fluciclovine 
PET scan (Day 1) or up to 3 days after. Where applicable, it should take place before the 
Visit 4 – SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention. 
1. Perform Visit 2 on-study MRI brain scan as outlined in Section 11.5.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 48 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
2. Upload Visit 2 on-study MRI brain scan to the central imaging core laboratory. 
3. Review of 18F-fluciclovine PET brain scan (with Visit 2 MRI for anatomical 
reference) by site investigator to identify potential additional PET lesions, not 
previously reported on SoC MRI. 
4. Confirm sites of reference lesion and other equivocal lesions on Visit 2 scans. 
The on-site investigator will review the 18F-fluciclovine PET scan to identify and annotate 
potential additional lesions, not previously reported on SoC MRI (termed ‘additional PET 
lesions’). Additional PET lesions should be annotated only where judged suggestive of brain 
metastasis, warranting confirmation by clinical follow-up, biopsy or resection, according to 
SoC practice. Undertaking biopsy/resection of additional PET lesion(s) identified on the 
18F-fluciclovine PET scan is at the discretion of on-site investigators. Moreover, an additional 
PET lesion should be discrete and spatially separate from known, pre-existing lesions. In 
particular, the following should not be annotated as Additional PET lesions: known 
pre-existing non-progressive lesions (considered at site level as stable or partially 
responding), 18F-fluciclovine activity contiguous with a known lesion (previously annotated 
or otherwise) and apparently incongruent with the lesion’s outline on correlating MRI, 
particularly where this may be reasonably explained by image registration. 
10.4. 
Visit 3 – Safety Follow-up (+1 to 3 days after IMP Injection/PET) 
1. Clinical safety review by telephone call (or in person if same day as scheduled SoC 
biopsy, Visit 2 MRI, or other planned visit) to assess concomitant medications and 
AEs.
2. Record any changes in concomitant medications since Screening (Visit 1). 
3. Record any AEs which have occurred during the safety reporting period (from the 
time of 18F-fluciclovine administration until 1 day post 18F-fluciclovine 
administration). For scheduling purposes, the subject may be contacted up to 3 days 
after IMP injection, but the assessment is to be limited to the first day after IMP 
injection only. 
10.5.
Visit 4 – SoC Biopsy/Neurosurgical Intervention (if applicable, 
pre-planned 1 to 21 days after IMP Injection/PET) 
Where this visit is applicable, SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention should also take place 
after both the Visit 2 on-study MRI brain scan and Visit 3 Safety Follow-up. 
1. Document neurosurgical procedure: 
a. Record sites of reference lesion and other equivocal lesions which underwent SoC 
biopsy, and where applicable, ‘additional PET lesion(s)’, if performed. 
b. Record sites of reference lesion and other equivocal lesions which underwent 
resection, and where applicable, ‘additional PET lesion(s)’, if performed.*
* Undertaking biopsy/resection of additional PET lesion(s) identified on the 
18F-fluciclovine PET scan is at the discretion of the on-site investigators. The 
lesions should be judged suggestive of brain metastasis, warranting confirmation 
according to SoC practice. The subject will receive post-procedural management 
per institutional SoC. 
c. If applicable, record neuronavigation system used for neurosurgical procedure. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 49 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
d. Where biopsy was performed, upload image/screenshot of neuronavigation system 
depicting stereotactic coordinates of biopsy. Where resection was performed, 
upload image/screenshot of neuronavigation system depicting the surgical 
resection plan/approach (if neuronavigation was not used for resection, a 
representative screenshot of the post-procedure MRI demonstrating the resection 
cavity is suitable). 
e. Upload neurosurgical procedural report. 
f. Record any clinical factors associated with the neurosurgical intervention which 
impacted the type of procedure performed.
2. Label specimens with lesion ID as referenced by the imaging core laboratory study 
imaging platform on the previously annotated scans. 
3. Process specimens per SoC and local laboratory standard practice. Histopathological 
report from SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention will be recorded.
4. Ship a representative set of specimens to the central laboratory per the Sample 
Processing Manual. 
10.6. 
Visit 5 – Month 6 Follow-up (183 days ± 14 days) 
All subjects will be followed for 6 months (183 days ± 14 days) following 18F-fluciclovine 
PET in order to collect diagnostic information (brain imaging scans, histopathological 
reports) and treatment regimens which will be provided to the Central Truth Panel 
(Section 11.8). Treatment regimens will pertain to treatments and therapies for the brain 
lesion(s) and primary tumor. These will include and are not limited to systemic treatments 
such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy and corticosteroids; and localized therapies such as 
radiotherapy, LITT and craniotomy.  
The date and nature of the diagnosis (presence or absence of metastasis) of the reference, 
other equivocal and additional PET (if applicable) lesions reached by site will be collected. 
An assessment of neurological deterioration will be recorded. The subject mortality status 
will also be recorded, with collection of date and cause of death (if applicable).  
Determination of a subject’s mortality status must be verifiable from the medical record, 
including confirmation of death where applicable or, where alive, a documented clinical 
interaction (e.g. imaging scan, blood test, consult) taking place on or beyond Day 169.  If the 
site is unable to verify mortality status from the medical record, additional steps will be 
undertaken, including a review of vital records or a documented phone call to the patient or 
the patient’s family.
Therefore, this Visit comprises predominantly of investigator review of the subject medical 
record and will take place in the physical absence of the subject. Subjects whose reference or 
other equivocal lesion(s) continue to be considered at the site level to be equivocal for brain 
metastasis at Month 6 (Visit 5) will have a final research MRI unless an SoC MRI was 
performed within the prior 3 weeks.
10.7. 
Early Withdrawal  
Early withdrawal is defined as discontinuing from study within 168 days of Visit 2. Death is 
not considered as early withdrawal. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 50 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
Record any AEs or changes to concomitant medication occurring during safety 
reporting period. 
Record reason for early withdrawal.
Record clinical follow-up data to date of early withdrawal as detailed in Visit 5 
evaluations (see Section 10.6 ). 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 51 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
11. 
IMAGING PROTOCOL 
Full details on the imaging protocol are in the Image Acquisition Standards. 
11.1.
18F-fluciclovine PET Scan Patient Preparation
Patients should be advised not to eat for at least 4 hours prior to administration of 
18F-fluciclovine injection.  Patients may have water or other clear fluids within this time 
window.
11.2. 
PET/CT Scanner 
A dedicated hybrid PET scanner (e.g., PET/CT, PET/MRI) is mandatory. The selected PET 
scanner must be qualified by the study management team. 
11.3.
18F-fluciclovine Injection Administration
See Section 8.8 and the Pharmacy Manual for administration instructions.
11.4.
18F-fluciclovine PET Acquisition
For the dynamic PET acquisition, subjects will be imaged for approximately 30 minutes. For 
the CT acquisition (if acquired on a PET/CT scanner), an unenhanced (no IV contrast) CT 
will be employed.
11.5. 
On-Study MRI Acquisition 
All subjects will receive an on-study, study-specific brain MRI scan at Visit 2 consisting of 
standard MRI sequences including (1) T1-weighted MRI without and with contrast 
enhancement, (2) FLAIR and/or T2-weighted MRI, and (3) diffusion-weighted imaging, 
ideally on the same day as the PET scan or up to a maximum of 3 days after the PET scan. 
A final on-study MRI will be performed at Visit 5 (Month 6) only for any surviving subject 
whose reference or other equivocal lesion(s) remain equivocal at site level, unless an SoC 
MRI was performed within the preceding 3 weeks.
11.6. 
Image Transfer 
Following the completion of PET and on-study MRI imaging at the study site, the scan data 
will be sent to the Imaging Core Lab using either the Imaging Management Solution software 
or on physical media by courier.
11.7. 
Image Evaluability 
Both PET and on-study MRI scans will be assessed by the Imaging Core Lab for evaluability 
based on the Image Quality Standards. All data will undergo quality control including 
technical analysis, indication and protocol specific criteria, based on the parameters detailed 
in the Image Acquisition Standards.  
11.8. 
Central Evaluations 
11.8.1.
Central Histopathology 
As described in Section 10.5, a representative set of specimens obtained in subjects 
undergoing Visit 4 (SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention) will be shipped to a central 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 52 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
laboratory. This is to allow for central histopathology review. Detailed specification of this 
workflow, and assignment of recurrent metastasis (positive) vs no recurrent metastasis 
(negative) based on the central review, will be laid out prospectively in a histopathology 
charter.
11.8.2.
Central Truth Panel
An independent panel consisting of an experienced neuro-oncologist, neuroradiologist, 
neuropathologist, neurosurgeon, and radiation oncologist with expertise in treating brain 
tumors will serve as a Central Truth Panel. 
 The panel will establish a charter to prospectively define objective data review 
parameters including pre-specified MRI evaluation criteria.
 The panel will review the central histopathology results (where applicable) and 
clinical data (including site histopathology reports, follow-up MRI scans, and 
cancer-related therapies) to confer a diagnosis of recurrent metastasis (positive) vs 
no recurrent metastasis (negative) for each reference lesion, other equivocal 
lesion(s), and additional PET lesions. 
 The clinical data will encompass a 6-month period following 18F-fluciclovine 
PET, or up to the time when the subject dies, whichever comes first.
The Central Truth Panel will have no access to the 18F-fluciclovine PET scans, nor 
the study record of lesion diagnosis reached by the site. 
11.8.3.
Blinded Image Evaluation 
A 3-reader central, independent BIE of the 18F-fluciclovine PET scans will be performed, 
diagnosing recurrent metastasis (positive) vs no recurrent metastasis (negative) for each 
reference lesion, other equivocal lesion(s) and additional PET lesion(s), using the Visit 2 
MRI for anatomical reference. 
Image criteria used in the BIE will be informed by a Phase 2b study 
(BED-FLC-219).
Inter- and intra-reader concordance will be measured.
The readers will not have access to clinical history, prior clinical imaging, any 
site-generated diagnostic evidence, nor the final patient outcome.
11.8.4.
Central Neuroradiologist Reader
A neuroradiologist reader will independently review the reference lesion on the historical and 
Screening SoC MRI scans to assess each subject’s baseline equivocal status. This 
independent determination will be applied to a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 53 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
12. 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION 
12.1. 
Adverse Events 
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a 
pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the 
treatment. An AE is therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal 
laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the administration of an 
investigational product, whether or not related to that investigational product. An unexpected 
AE is one of a type not identified in nature, severity, or frequency in the current 
Investigator’s Brochure or is of greater severity or frequency than expected based on the 
information in the Investigator’s Brochure.
The investigator will probe, via discussion with the subject, for the occurrence of AEs during 
each subject visit within the AE collection period. The collection period for all AEs will 
begin after initiation of 18F-fluciclovine injection and end 1 day post 18F-fluciclovine 
administration (i.e., Day 2). Any unresolved AE at Visit 3 Safety Follow-up beyond Day 2 
will be followed until resolution or stabilization. The investigator will record the information 
in the site’s source documents. Adverse events will be recorded in the subject electronic Case 
Report form (eCRF). Adverse events will be described by duration (start and stop dates and 
times), severity, outcome, treatment and relation to study drug. 
12.2. 
AE Severity 
The National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 
Version 5 (November 27, 2017) will be used to assess and grade event severity, including 
laboratory abnormalities judged to be clinically significant. For events not specifically 
mentioned in CTCAE, the general severity grading is provided below (Table 2).
Table 2. CTCAE (V5) AE Severity Grading
Severity (Toxicity Grade)
Description
Grade 1
Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or 
diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated.
Grade 2
Moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention 
indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL.*
Grade 3
Severe or medically significant but not immediately 
life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of 
hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care 
ADL**.
Grade 4
Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention 
indicated. 
Grade 5
Death related to AE. 
ADL, activities of daily living; AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. 
*Instrumental ADL refer to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, managing 
money, etc. 
** Self-care ADL refer to bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications, 
and not bedridden.   

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 54 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
12.3. 
Adverse Event Relationship to IMP 
The relationship of an AE to IMP will be categorized as follows:
Related: when there is a reasonable possibility of a causal relationship between IMP 
administration and an AE (i.e., adverse drug reaction). 
Not related: when an AE does not follow a reasonable temporal sequence from IMP 
administration or when an AE can be reasonably explained by other factors including 
underlying disease, concomitant drugs or concurrent treatment. 
12.4. 
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) 
An SAE is defined as any adverse event occurring at any dose that results in any of the 
following outcomes:
 death
a life-threatening adverse experience
inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
a persistent or significant disability/incapacity
 a congenital anomaly/birth defect  
Other important medical events may also be considered an SAE when, based on appropriate 
medical judgment, they jeopardize the subject or require intervention to prevent one of the 
outcomes listed above.  
12.4.1. 
Serious Adverse Event Reporting
Study sites will document all SAEs that occur (whether or not related to study drug) on an 
SAE Report Form. The collection period for all SAEs will begin after initiation of 
18F-fluciclovine injection and end 1 day post 18F-fluciclovine administration (i.e., Day 2). 
After this point, the investigator is not required to actively solicit SAE information from 
subjects. However, if they should become aware of an SAE that they suspect is related to the 
IMP, then they should report it. Any unresolved SAE beyond Day 2 at Visit 3 Safety Follow-
up phone call, will be followed until resolution or stabilization. 
All SAEs must be reported within 24 hours of the site study team becoming aware of the 
event by sending the completed SAE Report Form by fax, or scanned and emailed, to:
Bracco Diagnostics Inc. Drug Safety Unit: 
drugsafetyus@blueearthdx.com
Fax: +1 609-514-2522
Additional and further requested information (follow-up or corrections to the original event) 
will be detailed on a new SAE Report Form and faxed/emailed to the same address.
For the US, in accordance with the standard operating procedures and policies of the local 
Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) the site investigator 
will report SAEs to the IRB/IEC. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 55 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
12.4.2.
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR)
A SUSAR is a serious adverse reaction, the nature and severity of which is not consistent 
with the reference safety information set out in the Investigator’s Brochure.  
The Sponsor will be responsible for reporting all SUSARs to the relevant authorities, and 
other parties, as applicable. 
Investigators will be informed of all SUSARs for the relevant IMP for all studies sponsored 
by Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd, whether or not the event occurred in the current study. 
12.4.3.
Pregnancy
In the unlikely event of a pregnancy arising from sexual conduct performed within 24 hours 
following IMP administration, it will require expedited reporting to the sponsor’s 
pharmacovigilance department within the same timelines as an SAE. Women who become
pregnant between the Screening visit and Visit 2 should be withdrawn from the study. All 
reported pregnancies in study participants should be followed and the outcome reported using 
the same form. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets any of the criteria for seriousness, it 
must also be reported as an SAE.  Examples of pregnancy outcomes that are SAEs:  
 Reports of congenital anomalies or developmental delay, in the fetus or the child.  
 Reports of fetal death and spontaneous abortion.
 Reports of suspected adverse reactions in the neonate that are classified as serious. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 56 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
13. 
DISCONTINUATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SUBJECTS 
13.1. 
Discontinuation/Withdrawal from the Study  
Subjects are free to withdraw from participation in the study at any time, for any reason, 
specified or unspecified, and without prejudice. 
An investigator may discontinue or withdraw a subject for the following reasons:   
 Significant protocol violation or non-compliance. 
 If any clinical AE, laboratory abnormality, or other medical condition or situation 
occurs such that continued participation in the study would not be in the best 
interests of the subject (investigator decision). 
 Protocol violation requiring discontinuation of study treatment. 
 If the subject meets the exclusion criteria (either newly developed or not 
previously recognized) that precludes further study participation. 
 Lost to follow-up.
 Sponsor request for early termination of study. 
 Subject requests to be withdrawn from the study.
 Positive pregnancy test (females).
The reason for subject discontinuation or withdrawal from the study, if known, will be 
recorded in the subject’s source documents and in the eCRF.
Refer to Section 10.7 for early withdrawal procedures.
13.2. 
Replacement of Subjects 
Subjects who sign the informed consent form (ICF) and do not receive the study scan may be 
replaced. Subjects who sign the ICF and receive the study scan, but the scan is not considered 
evaluable (refer to Section 11 of the Imaging Protocol), may be replaced. Subjects who sign 
the ICF, and receive the study scan, and subsequently withdraw early (as defined in
Section 10.7), or are withdrawn or discontinued from the study, may be replaced. 
13.3. 
Lost to Follow-up 
A subject will be considered lost-to-follow-up if there are no follow-up data at Visit 5 
(183 days ± 14 days) and the subject is unable to be contacted by the study site staff. Death 
will not be considered lost to follow-up. 
The following actions must be taken if a subject fails to complete a required study visit: 
 The site will attempt to contact the subject and reschedule the missed visit (if 
within acceptable visit windows), and ascertain if the subject wishes to and/or 
should continue in the study.
 Where a pre-scheduled Visit 4/Day 3-22 SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention is 
planned, the site will attempt to contact the subject and reschedule the missed visit 
prior to the SoC biopsy/neurosurgical intervention, and ascertain if the subject 
wishes to and/or should continue in the study. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 57 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
Before a subject is deemed lost to follow-up, the investigator or designee will 
make every effort to regain contact with the subject (where possible, 3 telephone 
calls and, if necessary, a certified letter to the subject’s last known mailing address 
or local equivalent methods). These contact attempts should be documented in the 
subject’s medical record or study file.  
 Should the subject continue to be unreachable, he or she will be considered to 
have withdrawn from the study with a primary reason of lost to follow-up. A 
subject will be considered unreachable when: 
 Has received IMP and is beyond 183 days post-IMP administration. 
 Has not received IMP and is beyond 42 days of pre-study SoC MRI. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 58 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
14. 
PROTOCOL VIOLATIONS  
A protocol violation occurs when the subject, investigator, or Sponsor fails to adhere to 
significant protocol requirements affecting the inclusion, exclusion, subject safety and 
primary endpoint criteria. Protocol violations for this study include, but are not limited to, the 
following:
 Failure to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. 
 Use of a prohibited concomitant medication. 
 Use of a non-validated PET scanner or imaging technique. 
Significant non-compliance from Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines will also result in 
a protocol violation. The Sponsor will determine if a protocol violation will result in 
withdrawal of a subject. 
When a protocol violation occurs, it will be discussed with the investigator and reported to 
the Sponsor for further assessment of the violation and any potential impact on ongoing 
protocol requirements and/or on the utility of the subject’s collected study data. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 59 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
15. 
STATISTICAL METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS 
Prior to database lock and analysis of the final study data, a detailed Statistical Analysis Plan 
(SAP) will be prepared and approved, describing all the analyses to be performed. The SAP 
will document any changes to the analyses described below. Continuous data will be 
summarized using mean, standard deviation, median, and minimum and maximum values. 
Categorical data will be summarized using frequency counts and percentages. 
15.1.
Estimation of Sample Size
Approximately 150 subjects will be enrolled, to obtain 130 evaluable subjects. 
A one-sample binomial exact test will be used to test the following hypotheses in NPA and 
PPA of 18F-fluciclovine PET:
NPA 
H0(NPA
0
H1(NPA): NPA of PET >NPA0
PPA
 H0(PPA
0
 H1(PPA): PPA of PET >PPA0 
Where NPA0 and PPA0 are performance goals for NPA and PPA, respectively.  
Performance goals of 50% (NPA0) for NPA and 50% (PPA0) for PPA were selected as 
acceptable thresholds given the setting where SoC imaging is already equivocal. The lower 
limits for the exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) (Clopper-Pearson method) for both NPA 
and PPA should be greater than 50%. Assuming an NPA of at least 70% and a PPA of at least 
70% for 18F-fluciclovine PET would need to be observed, a sample size of 130 would achieve 
90% power at a 1-sided significance level of 0.025 to reject the performance goals for both 
NPA and PPA; assuming a brain metastasis prevalence rate of 0.5. 
15.2.
Analysis Sets
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) will include all enrolled subjects dosed with IMP with an 
evaluable Visit 2 on-study PET scan. The FAS will be used for primary and secondary non-
safety endpoints (including diagnostic performance and inter-reader and intra-reader 
assessment for the PET scans). 
The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) will include all subjects dosed with IMP (with or without the 
associated PET scan). The SAF will be used for all safety analyses.  
15.3. 
Subject Disposition 
Subject disposition will be summarized for all subjects who entered the study. Summaries 
will include the number and percentage of subjects in each analysis set, completing the study, 
and discontinuing the study early by the primary reason for discontinuation. 
15.4. 
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics 
Demographic variables (including age, sex, ethnicity and race) and baseline characteristics 
(e.g., height, weight, body mass index [to be calculated], ECOG performance status, medical 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 60 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
history, prior treatment history) will be summarized using appropriate summary statistics for 
the FAS and SAF. 
15.5. 
Analysis of Primary Endpoint 
The primary endpoint for the study is subject-level NPA and PPA (equivalent to specificity 
and sensitivity, respectively) of 18F-fluciclovine PET in detecting recurrent brain metastases. 
Subject-level NPA and PPA will be calculated based on BIE of 18F-fluciclovine PET 
compared to SoR on the reference lesion.
Where NPA0 and PPA0 are performance goals for NPA and PPA, respectively. Performance 
goals of 50% (NPA0) for NPA and 50% (PPA0) for PPA were selected as acceptable 
thresholds given the setting where SoC imaging is already equivocal. The analyses for NPA 
and PPA will be performed using the one-sample binomial exact test. In addition to the rates, 
exact two-sided 95% CIs according to the Clopper-Pearson method will also be provided. If 
the pre-defined NPA and PPA goals are met by the same two of three readers (both tests 
reach statistical significance for the same two readers), the study will be considered to have 
successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of 18f-fluciclovine PET in detecting recurrent 
brain metastases.  
15.6. 
Analysis of Secondary Endpoint(s) 
15.6.1.
Subject-Level Positive Predictive Value / Negative Predictive Value 
Subject-level PPV and NPV of 18F-fluciclovine PET for detecting recurrent brain metastases 
will be calculated based on BIE of 18F-fluciclovine PET compared to SoR on the reference 
lesion. The point estimates for PPV and NPV, together with the 95% 2-sided exact CI 
(Clopper-Pearson method) will be presented.
15.6.2. 
Lesion-Level Diagnostic Performance 
Lesion-level diagnostic performance (lesion level PPA, NPA, PPV and NPV) will be 
calculated based on BIE of 18F-fluciclovine PET compared to SoR on all lesions (reference, 
other equivocal and additional PET lesions).
15.6.3. 
Subgroup Analysis of Diagnostic Performance Data 
Subgroup analyses of subject-level PPA, NPA, PPV, and NPV of 18F-fluciclovine PET, 
according to primary tumor type and concurrent immunotherapy, will also be presented.
15.6.4.
Clinical Utility
Clinical utility endpoints include the following, and will be analyzed as described: 
 Number of days taken by the site to establish presence/absence of metastasis by 
clinical follow-up will be defined as the time from administration of 
18F-fluciclovine to the date the presence or absence of metastasis is determined at 
site level. If the presence or absence of metastasis is not ascertained by the time 
the subject reaches the end of the follow-up or when the subject prematurely 
withdraws from the study, the subject will be censored on the date he/she 
withdraws from the study. Kaplan-Meier methodology will be used to handle the 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 61 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
censoring of the data, and to estimate the median time to establish 
presence/absence of metastasis. 
 Proportion of subjects with additional metastases identified on 18F-fluciclovine 
PET but not on SoC MRI. The estimate of the percentage and the associated 95% 
2-sided exact CI will be presented.
 Proportion of subjects whose prospective diagnostic management plan changes 
following 18F-fluciclovine PET, by comparing the diagnostic management plans 
before and after 18F-fluciclovine PET. The estimate of the percentage and the 
associated 95% 2-sided exact CI will be presented.
15.6.5. 
Inter-Reader / Intra-Reader Agreement 
Cohen’s kappa statistic will be calculated to assess inter-reader and intra-reader agreement on 
18F-fluciclovine PET scan central reads. The statistic will be presented for each pairwise 
comparison of the 3 readers for the inter-reader agreements, at the subject-level 
(i.e., reference lesion only) and also at lesion-level (i.e., all lesions defined by site). Similar 
statistics will be presented for the initial read vs re-read of a subset of PET scans for each 
reader. 
15.6.6. 
Safety 
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as those AEs with onset after the 
dose of IMP, or existing events that worsened after the dose of IMP during the study, up to 1 
day following IMP administration. Verbatim terms of the AEs will be coded to preferred 
terms (PTs) and system organ classes using the latest version of Medical Dictionary for 
Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), for data summary purposes. Severity of AEs will be graded 
using the NCI-CTCAE v5.0. The frequency of TEAEs will be summarized overall, by system 
organ classes and PT, and by severity. IMP-related AEs and SAEs will also be summarized. 
15.7. 
Planned Interim Analysis 
Not applicable.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 62 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
16. 
DATA COLLECTION, RETENTION AND MONITORING 
16.1. 
Data Collection Instruments 
The investigator will prepare and maintain adequate and accurate source documents designed 
to record all observations and other pertinent data for each subject administered the study 
drug. Particular care should be taken to ensure all data points are recorded in source 
documentation, especially those which are not part of standard practice.
The investigator will collect relevant pre- and post-treatment MRI brain scans at Screening, 
on-study PET and MRI scans and SoC imaging during study and upload the images to the 
central imaging core lab. 
Documentation of subject cancer history must include: 
 Type of primary tumor that gave rise to the brain metastasis. 
 Previous treatments for brain metastases. 
 Previous cancer treatments for primary tumor. 
 Histopathological confirmation of the primary tumor or a metastatic site within 
4 years of Screening. 
Study personnel at each site will enter data from source documents corresponding to a 
subject’s visit into the protocol-specific eCRF when the information corresponding to that 
visit is available. 
Subjects will not be identified by name in the study database or on any study documents to be 
collected by the Sponsor and will be identified by a site number and subject number.
If a correction is required for an eCRF, the time and date stamps track the person entering or 
updating eCRF data and creates an electronic audit trail. 
The investigator is responsible for all information collected on subjects enrolled in this study. 
All data collected during the course of this study must be reviewed and verified for 
completeness and accuracy by the investigator.
16.2.
Data Management Procedures
The data will be entered into a validated database. The Data Management group will be 
responsible for data processing, in accordance with procedural documentation. Database lock 
will occur once quality assurance procedures have been completed.
All procedures for the handling and analysis of data will be conducted using good computing 
practices meeting FDA guidelines for the handling and analysis of data for clinical trials.
16.3. 
Data Quality Control and Reporting 
After data have been entered into the study database, a system of computerized data 
validation checks will be implemented and applied to the database on a regular basis. Queries 
are entered, tracked, and resolved through the electronic data capture system directly. The 
study database will be updated in accordance with the resolved queries. All changes to the 
study database will be documented.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 63 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
16.4. 
Archiving of Data 
The database is safeguarded against unauthorized access by established security procedures; 
appropriate backup copies of the database and related software files will be maintained. 
Databases are backed up by the database administrator in conjunction with any updates or 
changes to the database. 
At critical junctures of the protocol (e.g., production of interim reports and final reports), data 
for analysis is locked and cleaned per established procedures. 
16.5. 
Availability and Retention of Investigational Records 
The investigator should maintain adequate and accurate source documents and study records 
that include all pertinent observations on each of the site’s study subjects. Source data should 
be attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate and complete. Changes to source 
data should be traceable, should not obscure the original entry, and should be explained if 
necessary. 
The investigator / institution should maintain the study documents as specified in Section 8 of 
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) GCP E6 (R2) and as required by the 
applicable regulatory requirement(s). The investigator should take measures to prevent 
accidental or premature destruction of these documents.
Upon request of the monitor, auditor, IRB/IEC, or regulatory authority, the investigator must 
make available for direct access all requested study-related records.
Study records should be retained for a minimum of 2 years after the last approval of a 
marketing application in an ICH region and until there are no pending or contemplated 
marketing applications in an ICH region or until at least 2 years have elapsed since the formal 
discontinuation of clinical development of the study intervention / at least 25 years after the 
end of the clinical trial. These documents should be retained for a longer period, however, if 
required by applicable local regulations. No records will be destroyed without the written 
consent of the Sponsor, if applicable. It is the responsibility of the Sponsor to inform the 
investigator when these documents no longer need to be retained.
The medical files of subjects shall be archived in accordance with applicable local 
regulations.
16.6.
Monitoring and Auditing
Monitoring visits will be conducted by representatives of the Sponsor according to ICH GCP 
and relevant regulations. By signing this protocol, the investigator grants permission to the 
Sponsor’s (or designee’s) monitors and auditors, as well as the IRB/IEC and regulatory 
authorities to conduct on-site monitoring and/or auditing and provide direct access to all 
requested study-related records. 
16.7. 
Subject Confidentiality 
In order to maintain subject confidentiality, only a site number and subject number will 
identify all study subjects on eCRFs and other documentation submitted to the Sponsor.  
Clinical information will not be released without written permission of the subject, except as 
necessary for monitoring by Regulatory Authorities. The investigator must also comply with 
all applicable privacy regulations (e.g., HIPAA of 1996, etc.). 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 64 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
17. 
REGULATORY, ETHICAL AND STUDY OVERSIGHT 
CONSIDERATIONS 
The study will be conducted in accordance with ICH GCP and all applicable regulations. The 
investigator will assure that no deviation from, or changes to the protocol will take place 
without prior agreement from the Sponsor and documented approval from the relevant 
regulatory authority (if applicable) and IRB/IEC, except where necessary to eliminate an 
immediate hazard(s) to the trial subjects. All personnel involved in the conduct of this study 
have completed ICH GCP training, relevant to their role. 
17.1.
Institutional Review Boards and Independent Ethics Committees
Any documents that the IRB/IEC may need to fulfill its responsibilities (such as protocol, 
protocol amendments, Investigator’s Brochure, consent forms, information concerning 
subject recruitment, payment or compensation procedures, or other pertinent information) 
will be submitted to the IRB/IEC.
The IRB/IECs written unconditional approval / favorable opinion of the study, and any 
additional local approvals (e.g., hospital management, Radiation Safety Committee, etc.), 
must be obtained prior to shipment of study drug to the site and prior to any subjects 
undergoing study-specific procedures. The investigator will obtain assurance of IRB/IEC 
compliance with regulations. Note: Regulatory authority approvals may also be required.
The IRB/IEC’s standard operating procedures and policies will be followed for the 
submission of SAEs and progress reports during the conduct of the study. 
An end of study notification will be submitted per regulatory requirements.  
17.2. 
Amendments 
Any decision to amend the clinical trial application and / or associated documents 
(e.g., protocol, informed consent form, CRF, Investigator’s Brochure, etc.) will be made by 
the Sponsor. 
The relevant regulations will be followed to determine what approvals from regulatory, 
IRB/IEC or local bodies are required. All required approvals will be obtained prior to 
implementation of the amendment, except as necessary to eliminate immediate safety hazards 
to subjects in accordance with ICH E6 (R2), 4.5 and applicable regulatory requirements. The 
Sponsor will notify each participating investigator site when the amendment can be 
implemented.
All changes to the consent form will be IRB/IEC approved; a determination will be made 
regarding whether a new consent needs to be obtained from subjects who provided consent, 
using a previously approved consent form.
17.3. 
Subject Information and Consent/Assent  
In obtaining and documenting subject informed consent, the investigator must comply with 
the applicable regulatory requirement(s), ICH GCP and the ethical principles that have their 
origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. 
Subject information and consent forms, and any other written material provided to the 
subject, must be approved by the relevant IRB/IEC (and by any other body as required by 
national regulations) prior to the start of the study at each study site. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 65 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
The investigator (or an appropriately qualified designee) will explain the study to the subject 
or, if the subject is unable to provide informed consent, the subject’s LAR, and answer any 
questions that arise. A verbal explanation will be provided in terms suited to the subject’s, or 
subject’s LAR’s, comprehension, of the purposes, procedures, and potential risks of the study 
and the rights of research subjects. Subjects (and the subject’s LAR) will have the 
opportunity to carefully review the written information and consent form, to discuss the study 
with their family or surrogates, and be given ample time to think about the study and ask 
questions before agreeing to participate. 
Subjects (and the subject’s LAR) must be informed that participation is voluntary and that 
they may withdraw from the study at any time, without prejudice. The rights and welfare of 
the subjects will be protected by emphasizing to them that the quality of their medical care 
will not be adversely affected if they decline to participate in this study. 
Prior to the subject undergoing any study-specific procedures, the written informed consent 
form must be signed and personally dated by the subject, or their LAR, and by the person 
who conducted the informed consent discussion. The informed consent process will also be 
documented in the source document (including the date/time consent was obtained). 
If a subject is unable to read or if a LAR is unable to read, an impartial witness should be 
present during the entire informed consent discussion. The subject, or subject’s LAR, may 
orally consent to the subject’s participation, if the subject, or subject’s LAR is not capable of 
providing of signing and personally dating the consent form. Once the subject, or subject’s 
LAR, has provided consent, the witness should also sign and personally date the consent 
form. By signing the consent form the witness attests that the information sheet / consent 
form was accurately explained to, and apparently understood by, the subject, or subject’s 
LAR, and that informed consent was freely given by the subject, or subject’s LAR. 
The distribution of the signed information sheet /consent form will be as required by any 
applicable local regulations. Otherwise a copy of the signed informed consent document will 
be given to the subject and the original maintained with the subject’s records.  
The subject or subject’s LAR, will be informed in a timely manner if new information 
becomes available that may be relevant to the subject’s willingness to continue participation 
in the study. The communication of this information will be documented in the source 
documentation. The written subject information/consent form and any other written 
information provided to the subjects should be revised whenever important new information 
becomes available that may be relevant to the subject’s consent. Any revised written subject 
information and consent form should receive IRB/IEC approval / favorable opinion prior to 
use. The subject, or subject’s LAR, should sign and personally date any revised consent form 
and receive a copy (or original, if required by applicable regulations). 
17.4. 
Post-trial care   
18F-fluciclovine is a single-use diagnostic agent. No additional care for trial subjects is 
therefore planned once their participation through Visit 3 Safety Follow-Up has ended. All 
subjects will receive SoC treatment in-line with their medical condition as determined by 
their physician.
17.5. 
Publications  
The preparation and submittal for publication of manuscripts containing the study results 
shall be in accordance with a process determined by mutual written agreement among the 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 66 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
study Sponsor and participating institutions. The publication or presentation of any study 
results shall comply with all applicable privacy laws, including, but not limited to, the Health 
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the General Data Protection 
Regulation (EU) 2016/679.  
17.6.
Investigator Responsibilities
By signing the Protocol Agreement form, the investigator agrees to: 
1. Comply with ICH GCP principles and all applicable regulatory requirements; be 
familiar with the appropriate use of the investigational product(s) as described in the 
protocol, Investigator’s Brochure, and any other information sources provided. 
2. Personally conduct or supervise the study; maintain a list of appropriately qualified 
persons to whom significant trial-related duties are delegated. Ensure all persons 
assisting with the study are adequately informed about the protocol, the 
investigational product(s), and their study-related duties. 
3. Ensure that all study-related medical decisions are made by a qualified physician who 
is an investigator or sub-investigator for the study; ensure that adequate medical care 
is provided to a subject for any adverse events.
4. Obtain the written approval / favorable opinion of the IRB/IEC before the study starts; 
provide the IRB/IEC with the current Investigator’s Brochure and all documents 
subject to review through-out the trial.
5. Submit a written progress report at least annually and in accordance with the 
IRB/IEC’s request; submit an end of trial notification / final report to the IRB/IEC at 
the end of the study.
6. Conduct the study in compliance with the approved protocol and not implement any 
deviation from, or changes to the protocol without the agreement of the Sponsor, and 
prior approval / favorable opinion of the IRB/IEC of an amendment, except where 
necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to a study subject, or when the change(s) 
involve only logistical or administrative aspects of the trial. 
a.
Promptly (immediately) notify the Sponsor and IRB/IEC of any actions taken to 
eliminate an immediate hazard to a study subject in accordance with ICH E6 (R2), 
4.5 and applicable regulatory requirements. 
b. Comply with ICH GCP, applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical 
principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, when obtaining and 
documenting informed consent. 
7. Ensure that investigational product(s) are: stored as specified by the Sponsor and in 
accordance with applicable regulatory requirement(s); used in accordance with the 
protocol and that adequate records are maintained. 
8. Immediately report all SAEs to the Sponsor unless otherwise specified in the protocol 
or other document (e.g., Investigator’s Brochure). Comply with applicable regulatory 
requirement(s) related to the reporting of unexpected serious adverse drug reactions to 
regulatory authorities and the IRB/IEC. 
9. If the study is prematurely terminated or suspended for any reason, promptly inform 
study subjects and assure appropriate therapy and follow-up, as required; follow ICH 
GCP and required regulatory requirements to notify the Sponsor and IRB/IEC. 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 67 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
10. Maintain adequate and accurate source documents and study records that include all 
pertinent observations on each of the study subjects; source data should be 
attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate and complete. Changes to 
source data must be traceable, should not obscure the original entry and should be 
explained if necessary.
11. Retain essential documents for at least 2 years of a marketing application /at least 
25 years from the end of the clinical trial or until notified by the Sponsor.
12. Provide monitors, auditors, IRB/IEC and regulatory authorities direct access to all 
requested study-related records.

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 68 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
18. 
REFERENCES 
1. Arvold ND, Lee EQ, Mehta MP, et al. Updates in the management of brain 
metastases. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18(8):1043-65.   (Arvold, 2016) 
2. Bach-Gansmo T, Nanni C, Nieh PT, et al. Multisite experience of the safety, detection 
rate and diagnostic performance of Fluciclovine (18F) positron emission 
tomography/computerized tomography imaging in the staging of biochemically 
recurrent prostate cancer. J Urol. 2017;197(3):676-83.   (Bach-Gansmo, 2017)
3. Bogsrud TV, Londalen A, Brandal P, Leske H, Panagopoulos I, Borghammer P, et al. 
18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in suspected residual or recurrent high-grade glioma. Clin 
Nucl Med. 2019.   (Bogsrud, 2019) 
4. Brown C, Dempsey MF, Gillen G, et al. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET 
image quality versus acquisition time. Nuc Med Commun. 2010;31 (3 ):254-9.   
(Brown, 2010)
5. Ceccon G, Lohmann P, Stoffels G, Judov N, Filss CP, Rapp M, et al. Dynamic O-(2-
18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography differentiates brain 
metastasis recurrence from radiation injury after radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol. 
2017;19(2):281-8.   (Ceccon, 2017) 
6. Cicone F, Minniti G, Romano A, Papa A, Scaringi C, Tavanti F, et al. Accuracy of 
F-DOPA PET and perfusion-MRI for differentiating radionecrotic from progressive 
brain metastases after radiosurgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 
2015;42(1):103-11.   (Cicone, 2015) 
7. Dequesada IM, Quisling RG, Yachnis A, Friedman WA. Can standard magnetic 
resonance imaging reliably distinguish recurrent tumor from radiation necrosis after 
radiosurgery for brain metastases? A radiographic-pathological study. Neurosurgery. 
2008;63(5):898-903; discussion 4.   (Dequesada, 2008)
8. FDA/NBTS. FDA-NBTS Public Workshop: product development for central nervous 
system (CNS) metastases. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-
human-drugs/fda-nbts-public-workshop-product-development-central-nervous-
system-cns-metastases [Accessed: 31 July 2019]. 2019. (FDA/NBTS, 2019)
9. Fuchs BC, Bode BP. Amino acid transporters ASCT2 and LATl in cancer: partners in 
crime? Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15(4):254-66.   (Fuchs, 2005) 
10. Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Filss CP, Piroth MD, Sabel M, Ruge MI, et al. Role of O-(2-
(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for differentiation of local recurrent brain 
metastasis from radiation necrosis. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(9):1367-74.    
(Galldiks, 2012) 
11. Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Albert NL, et al. PET imaging in patients with brain 
metastasis-report of the RANO/PET group. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21(5):585-95. 
(Galldiks, 2019) 
12. Heiss WD. Clinical impact of amino acid PET in gliomas. J Nucl Med. 
2014;55(8):1219-20.   (Heiss, 2014)
13. Henderson F, Brem S, O'Rourke DM, Nasrallah M, Buch VP, Young AJ, et al. 18F-
Fluciclovine PET to distinguish treatment-related effects from disease progression in 
recurrent glioblastoma: PET fusion with MRI guides neurosurgical sampling. Neuro-
Oncology Practice. 2019:1-6.   (Henderson, 2019) 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 69 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
14. Kann BH, Park HS, Johnson SB, et al. Radiosurgery for brain metastases: changing 
practice patterns and disparities in the United States. J Natl Compr Cane Netw. 2017; 
15(12): 1494-502.   (Kann, 2017)
15. Karlberg A, Berntsen EM, Johansen H, Skjulsvik AJ, Reinertsen I, Dai HY, et al. 18F-
FACBC PET/MRI in diagnostic assessment and neurosurgery of gliomas. Clin Nucl 
Med. 2019;44(7):550-9.   (Karlberg, 2019)
16. Kaufmann TJ, Smits M, Boxerman J, Huang R, Barboriak DP, Weller M, et al. 
Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for 
clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol. 2020; 
noaa030, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa030. (Kaufmann, 2020)
17. Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, Villa S, Fauchon F, Baumert BG, et al. Adjuvant 
whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection 
of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin 
Oncol. 2011;29(2):134-41.   (Kocher, 2011)
18. Kondo A, Ishii H, Aoki S, et al. Phase Ila clinical study of [18F]fluciclovine: efficacy 
and safety of a new PET tracer for brain tumors. Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30(9):608-18.   
(Kondo, 2016) 
19. Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Update on amino acid PET of brain tumours. Curr Opin 
Neurol. 2018;31(4):354-61.   (Langen, 2018)
20. Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Hattingen E, Shah NJ. Advances in neuro-oncology imaging. 
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(5):279-89.   (Langen, 2017)
21. Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, Barani IJ, Barboriak DP, Baumert BG, et al. Response 
assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet 
Oncol. 2015;16(6):e270-8.   (Lin, 2015)  
22. Lizarraga KJ, Allen-Auerbach M, Czernin J, DeSalles AA, Yong WH, Phelps ME, et 
al. (18)F-FDOPA PET for differentiating recurrent or progressive brain metastatic 
tumors from late or delayed radiation injury after radiation treatment. J Nucl Med. 
2014;55(1):30-6.   (Lizarraga, 2014)
23. McParland BJ, Wall A, Johansson S, et al. The clinical safety, biodistribution and 
internal radiation dosimetry of [18F]fluciclovine in healthy adult volunteers. Eur J 
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(8): 1256-64.   (McParland, 2013)
24. Michaud L, Beattie BJ, Akhurst T, Dunphy M, Zanzonico P, Finn R, et al. (18)F-
Fluciclovine ((18)F-FACBC) PET imaging of recurrent brain tumors. Eur J Nucl Med 
Mol Imaging. 2020;47: 1353-67. (Michaud, 2020) 
25. Minamimoto R, Saginoya T, Kondo C, Tomura N, Ito K, Matsuo Y, et al. 
Differentiation of brain tumor recurrence from post-radiotherapy necrosis with 11C-
methionine PET: visual assessment versus quantitative assessment. PLoS One. 
2015;10(7):e0132515.   (Minamimoto, 2015) 
26. NCCN 2019. NCCN Guidelines® Central Nervous System Cancers (5 March 2019). 
Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician gls/default.aspx 
[Accessed: 31 July 2019].   (NCCN, 2019)
27. Oka S, Okudaira H, Yoshida Y, Schuster DM, Goodman MM, Shirakami Y. 
Transport mechanisms of trans-1-amino-3-fluoro[1-(14)C]cyclobutanecarboxylic acid 
in prostate cancer cells. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39(1):109-19.   (Oka, 2012) 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 70 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
28. Oka S, Okudaira H, Ono M, Schuster DM, Goodman MM, Kawai K, et al. 
Differences in transport mechanisms of trans-1-amino-3-
[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid in inflammation, prostate cancer, and glioma 
cells: comparison with L-[methyl-11C]methionine and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-
glucose. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16(3):322-9.   (Oka, 2014) 
29. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. 
Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin 
Oncol. 1982;5:649-55.   (Oken, 1982) 
30. Okudaira H, Shikano N, Nishii R, Miyagi T, Yoshimoto M, Kobayashi M, et al. 
Putative transport mechanism and intracellular fate of trans-1-amino-3-18F-
fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid in human prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 
2011;52(5):822-9.   (Okudaira, 2011)
31. Ono M, Oka S, Okudaira H, Schuster DM, Goodman MM, Kawai K, et al. 
Comparative evaluation of transport mechanisms of trans-1-amino-3-
[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid and L-[methyl-11C]methionine in human 
glioma cell lines. Brain Res. 2013;1535:24-37.   (Ono, 2013) 
32. Parent EE, Benayoun M, Ibeanu I, Olson JJ, Hadjipanayis CG, Brat DJ, et al. 
18F-Fluciclovine PET discrimination between high- and low-grade gliomas. EJNMMI 
Res. 2018;8(1):67.   (Parent, 2018) 
33. Patel D, Nye J, Schuster D, et al. Fluciclovine PET imaging of intracranial metastases. 
J Nucl Med 2018;59(suppl 1): Abstract 1097 and Conference Poster.   (Patel, 2018)
34. Peng L, Parekh V, Huang P, Lin DD, Sheikh K, Baker B, et al. Distinguishing true 
progression from radionecrosis after stereotactic radiation therapy for brain 
metastases with machine learning and radiomics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 
2018;102(4):1236-43.   (Peng, 2018)
35. Pope WB. Brain metastases: neuroimaging. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;149:89-112.   
(Pope, 2018) 
36. Romagna A, Unterrainer M, Schmid-Tannwald C, Brendel M, Tonn JC, Nachbichler 
SB, et al. Suspected recurrence of brain metastases after focused high dose 
radiotherapy: can 18F-FET- PET overcome diagnostic uncertainties? Radiat Oncol. 
2016;11(1):139.   (Romagna, 2016)
37. Schuster DM, Votaw JR, Halkar RK, et al. Uptake of the synthetic PET amino acid 
radiotracer 1-amino-3-l 8F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-FACBC) within 
primary and metastatic brain cancer compared with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose 
(18F-FDG). J Nucl Med. 2003;44(suppl): Abstract 167P.   (Schuster, 2003)
38. Schuster DM, Nanni C, Fanti S, et al. Anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-
carboxylic acid: physiologic uptake patterns, incidental findings, and variants that 
may simulate disease. J Nuc Med 2014;55:1986-92.   (Schuster, 2014) 
39. Sinha R, Sage W, Watts C. The evolving clinical management of cerebral metastases. 
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(7):1173-85.   (Sinha, 2017)
40. Stockham AL, Tievsky AL, Koyfman SA, Reddy CA, Suh JH, Vogelbaum MA, et al. 
Conventional MRI does not reliably distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor 
recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol. 2012;109(1):149-58.   
(Stockham, 2012) 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023 
Page 71 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd  Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3
41. Suh JH. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of brain metastases. N Engl J 
Med. 2010;362(12):1119-27.   (Suh, 2010)
42. Teoh E, Morotti M, Bridges E, Jones D, Miar A, Wigfield S, et al. Fluciclovine (18F) 
is a marker for high-affinity glutamine transporter ASCT2-mediated amino acid 
transport in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(suppl 1):1028.   (Teoh, 2017)
43. Terakawa Y, Tsuyuguchi N, Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Higashiyama S, Takami T, et al. 
Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine PET for differentiation of recurrent brain 
tumors from radiation necrosis after radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(5):694-9.   
(Terakawa, 2008) 
44. Tsuyuguchi N, Terakawa Y, Uda T, Nakajo K, Kanemura Y. Diagnosis of brain 
tumors using amino acid transport PET imaging with (18)F-fluciclovine: A 
comparative study with L-methyl-(11)C-methionine PET imaging. Asia Ocean J Nucl 
Med Biol. 2017;5(2):85-94.   (Tsuyuguchi, 2017) 
45. Vellayappan B, Tan CL, Yong C, Khor LK, Koh WY, Yeo TT, et al. Diagnosis and 
management of radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases. Front Oncol. 
2018;8:395.   (Vellayappan, 2018) 
46. Verma N, Cowperthwaite MC, Burnett MG, et al. Differentiating tumor recurrence 
from treatment necrosis: a review of neuro-oncologic imaging strategies. Neuro 
Oncol. 2013;15(5):515-34.   (Verma, 2013) 
47. Wakabayashi T, Iuchi T, Tsuyuguchi N, et al. Diagnostic performance and safety of 
positron emission tomography Using 18F-Fluciclovine in patients with clinically 
suspected high- or low-grade gliomas: A multicenter phase IIb trial. Asia Ocean J
Nucl Med Biol. 2017;5(1 ): 10-21.   (Wakabayashi, 2017) 
48. Walker AJ, Ruzevick J, Malayeri AA, Rigamonti D, Lim M, Redmond KJ, et al. 
Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: how can we differentiate between 
treatment effect and disease progression? Future Oncol. 2014;10(7):1277-97.   
(Walker, 2014) 
49. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, et al. 
Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in 
neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1963-72.   (Wen, 2010)
50. Zhang J, Liu H, Tong H, et al. Clinical applications of contrast-enhanced perfusion 
MRI techniques in gliomas: recent advances and current challenges. Contrast Media 
Mol Imaging. 2017;2017:7064120.   (Zhang, 2017) 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023
Page 72 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3 
APPENDIX 1.
ECOG PERFORMANCE STATUS
ECOG PERFORMANCE STATUS a
Grade 
ECOG 
0 
Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 
1
Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out 
work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. 
2
Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work 
activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 
3
Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of 
waking hours. 
4 
Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or 
chair. 
5 
Dead 
ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. 
a As published in Oken, 1982. 
 

BED-FLC-312 Protocol Version 3.0, 17 March 2023
Page 73 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd 
Based on Protocol Template, SOP-MED-002-AD-2, Version 3 
APPENDIX 2.
PROTOCOL AGREEMENT
I have read the protocol specified below. In my formal capacity as Investigator, my duties include 
providing Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ltd with the information, as outlined in the protocol. It is 
understood that all information pertaining to the study will be held strictly confidential and that this 
confidentiality requirement applies to all study staff at this site. Furthermore, on behalf of the study 
staff and myself, I agree to maintain the procedures required to carry out the study in accordance 
with accepted GCP principles, applicable regulatory requirements, and to abide by the terms of this 
protocol. 
Protocol Number:  BED-FLC-312 
 
Protocol Title:  An Open-label, Single-arm, Single-dose, Prospective, Multicenter Phase 3 Study to 
Establish the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in 
Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases After Radiation Therapy (REVELATE) 
 
Protocol Version:  3.0 
Protocol Date:  17 March 2023  
 
 
 
 
Investigator Signature  
 
Date 
 
Print Name and Title 
Site # 
 
 
Site Name 
 
Address
Phone Number 
 
Email