Reducing Suicidal Ideation Through Insomnia Treatment
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Insomnia, Depression, Suicidal Ideation
Sponsor: Augusta University

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Reducing Suicidal Ideation through Insomnia Treatment   
                                                     (REST-IT) 
 
 
 
Clinical Protocol 
 
Version 1.4 
March 8, 2014 
 
 
 
Grant Number: 1R01MH095776-01A1 
 
Principal Investigator: 
VAUGHN MCCALL, M.D., MS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
2 
 
 
 
 
Project Summary 
Epidemiologic reports have linked insomnia to suicidal ideation and suicide death. However, no studies have 
determined whether treating insomnia decreases the risk of suicidality. We have new data indicating that       
(1) the link between insomnia and suicidal ideation holds true in clinical trials of depressed insomniacs, (2) 
dysfunctional cognitions about sleep are related to suicidal ideas, and (3) treatment of insomnia with hypnotics 
leads to a reduction of suicidal ideation. We now propose to test whether cautious use of hypnotics in suicidal, 
depressed insomniacs may reduce suicide risk in a multi-site clinical trial, with the following Specific Aims: 
 
Primary Aim:  We will assess the effect of treating insomnia with hypnotic medication on the intensity of 
suicidal ideation in depressed outpatients with insomnia and suicidal ideation.  
Hypothesis 1.  Treatment of depressed, insomniac and suicidal outpatients with open-label selective serotonin 
reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and blinded zolpidem controlled release (ZOL) will reduce suicidal ideation more 
than treatment with SSRI and blinded placebo. 
 
Secondary Aim: We will examine whether reduced suicidal ideation in depressed insomniacs is mediated 
through reduced dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, reduced hopelessness, or fewer nightmares. 
Hypothesis 2a.  Reduction in suicidal ideation will be mediated through reductions in dysfunctional beliefs 
about sleep. 
Hypothesis 2b. Reduction in suicidal ideation will be mediated through reductions in hopelessness. 
Hypothesis 2c. Reduction in suicidal ideation is mediated through fewer nightmares. 
 
Tertiary Aim: We will confirm findings from our prior pilot studies that treatment of insomnia in depressed 
insomniacs leads to improvements in health-related quality of life, especially in women. 
 
Exploratory Aim: We will archive actigraphy data to permit future examination to confirm our preliminary data 
that actigraphic activity decreases as suicidal ideation resolves. 
 
Overview of the Need for and Management of a Collaborative Application The sample sizes required to satisfy 
the Aims are relatively large, necessitating the pooled recruiting resources of 3 sites. Georgia Regents 
University (GRU) will serve both as the coordinating/data management site, as well as a recruiting site, with 
Duke and Wisconsin as recruiting sites. Project management will be coordinated through an Executive 
Committee of site principal investigators, under the supervision of a Data and Safety Monitoring Board. 
 
Impact on the Field This application has the potential to change providers’ practice in the approach to treating 
insomnia in depressed patients with mild-moderate suicidal ideation. It may also reveal the mechanisms 
whereby insomnia increases the risk for suicidal ideation and behavior, and begin to examine whether there is 
an actigraphic “signature” for reductions in suicidal ideation. When these lessons are applied to the clinical 
world, they can be applied with low cost.  

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
3 
 
3. RESEARCH STRATEGY 
3.a. Significance 
Suicide is a leading cause of death across all ages and occurs at a rate of 10-11 cases per 100,000 persons 
per year in the United States.1  It is the third-leading cause of death in those under 30 years of age.1 Most 
suicides occur in the context of an active psychiatric disorder, most often a major depressive episode (MDE).1  
 
The risk factors for suicide have been described, and include both unmodifiable and some potentially 
modifiable factors.2-4  Examples of unmodifiable factors are advancing age, male gender, and Caucasian 
ethnicity. Potentially modifiable risk factors include symptoms of depression, hopelessness, social isolation, 
active alcohol/substance use, and severe sleep disturbance.  As a predictor, insomnia is stronger than a 
specific suicide plan in predicting near-lethal suicide attempts,5 yet insomnia is often overlooked in reviews of 
risk factors for suicide and suicide prevention.6  The need to broaden the search for modifiable risk factors is 
epitomized by this recent statement: “nowhere is the lack of proven therapeutic methods greater than in the 
prevention of suicidal behavior.”7 
 
As we have reviewed elsewhere,8-10 60 research studies link insomnia to suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, or 
suicide death, including 40 in adults. 9;11-43  Insomnia and nightmares were the most common sleep 
disturbances associated with suicide, even after adjusting for severity of depression. Five studies were 
prospective and showed that insomnia was a risk for completed suicide. 22-25;38  The clinical association of 
insomnia, nightmares, and suicidal ideation is paralleled by the physiologic finding that, among depressed 
outpatients, there is an inverse relationship between REM sleep latency and intensity of suicidal ideation.43 
 
Despite these data, expert reviews of suicide risk factors and suicide prevention have generally overlooked 
insomnia.3;6  A limited number of somatic therapies have evidence for a specific anti-suicide effect in mood 
disorders, including lithium and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT).44;45 Notably, both lithium and ECT have 
favorable effects on  sleep.46;47  
 
3.b. The theoretical model 
Hopelessness is common in MDE and is itself a potentially modifiable risk factor for suicide.3 Interestingly, 
hopelessness is a key dysfunctional cognition that may perpetuate chronic insomnia, and  hopelessness is 
reflected in the content of the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale, which includes items such 
as ”When I sleep poorly one night, I know it will disturb my sleep schedule for the whole week”.48-50  These 
same dysfunctional beliefs regarding the hopelessness of sleep have been identified in depressed 
insomniacs.51 Treatment of insomnia with cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) reduces 
dysfunctional cognitions in primary insomnia, and resolves the insomnia syndrome.50  Therefore, our 
theoretical model (Figure 1, below) is that treatment of insomnia leads to reductions in dysfunctional beliefs 
and attitudes about sleep, and thereby leads to reduced intensity of suicidal ideation.         
 
Figure 1 
 Theoretical Model of Mediation of the Effect of Insomnia on Suicidal Ideation 
Construct 
        Insomnia 
 
     
   Mediators 
          
 
      Suicidal Ideation 
 
Metric             Insomnia Severity Index 
        Beck Hopelessness Scale   
             Scale for Suicide Ideation 
 
 
 
 
 
  Dysfunctional Beliefs & Attitudes 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 About Sleep 
 
 
 
 
 
  Disturbing Dream & Nightmare 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Severity Index 
   

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
4 
 
 
Despite growing evidence for CBT’s efficacy for both insomnia and depression, most patients with depression 
and insomnia receive pharmacologic treatment for insomnia. We reported that psychiatric disorders were the 
most common diagnoses associated with a prescription for a hypnotic medication.52 This is explained in part by 
the fact that (1) serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) do not immediately improve insomnia, (2) up to 40% of 
otherwise successfully treated MDE patients continue to have insomnia,53 and (3) up to 10% actually 
experience worsened insomnia.54  Thus, many taking SSRIs also receive a sleep aid medication,55  but the 
effect of hypnotics on suicidal ideation has never been evaluated in clinical trials. Physicians treating 
depressed persons with insomnia are left with no guidance as to whether suicidal thinking would be decreased 
by using hypnotics to treat insomnia. More information is needed to resolve this conundrum. 
 
The expert workshop on suicide prevention (led our DSMB chair, Dr. John Mann), concluded that “randomized 
controlled trials of psychopharmacology are needed in suicide prevention studies.”1 Targeted treatment of 
insomnia may represent one such avenue, although the use of hypnotic medications presents its own unique 
hazard. We show in our Preliminary Studies that (1) the relationship between insomnia and suicidal ideation 
holds true within the context of depression clinical trials, (2) dysfunctional beliefs about sleep may mediate risk 
for suicidal ideation in insomniacs, and (3) that depressed insomniacs who receive a hypnotic at bedtime will 
report lower, not higher, levels of suicidal ideation.   
 
3.c. Innovation 
Dr. McCall’s group at Wake Forest completed the first clinical trial examining insomnia and suicide risk.  
Targeting insomnia as a modifiable risk factor for suicidal ideation is innovative. Despite dozens of reports of 
association between sleep insomnia and suicide, there are no psychopharmacology trials targeting insomnia 
for suicide risk reduction.  Also, a plausible mechanism explaining the link between insomnia to suicide has not 
been explored. We will test the impact of insomnia therapy on suicidal thinking, and as part of our innovation, 
we will test whether improvement is mediated via reduction in distorted cognitions about sleep.  We also have 
unpublished data, described below, showing (1) that suicidal ideation is related to dysfunctional beliefs about 
sleep, and (2) that early reductions in suicidal ideation is associated with a drop in actigraphy values from 4-6 
PM. We will archive actigraphy data in this project for future analysis of biological signatures of early reductions 
in suicidal ideation. 
 
3.d. How this project will improve knowledge and practice 
Although some non-randomized studies have shown that hypnotic use is associated with less suicidal 
ideation,38 other studies show the opposite,56 leaving practitioners with little guidance as to the net value of 
hypnotics in depressed insomniacs with suicidal ideation. The results of the studies proposed in this application 
will inform this debate, and provide potential mechanisms (via actigraphy and dysfunctional beliefs about 
sleep) to explain the insomnia-suicide association. Further, this application is consistent with the August 2010 
Report of the National Advisory Mental Health Council’s Workgroup, “From Discovery to Cure”, which 
emphasized the importance of advancing ‘personalized treatment’ and ‘preemptive treatment’ (page 3).57 The 
emphasis of this Report is seen in our application as we identify insomnia as a symptom of particular relevance 
in some, but not all depressed patients, and deserving of targeted anti-insomnia intervention, leading to a 
preemptive reduction in suicidal ideation, and presumably, suicide. In Recommendation 2.4.1, the Report also 
calls for support for clinical trials which show that (a) “the adaptation [i.e., intervention] changes a factor 
[insomnia] that has been associated with ….partial response [suicidal ideation], and (b) clear explication of the 
mechanism [dysfunctional beliefs and cognitions about sleep] by which the moderator variable [insomnia] 
functions to disadvantage… a subgroup [insomniacs]. In Recommendation 1.3, the Report also calls for 
studies to ‘identify biomarkers [actigraphy] predictive of treatment response.”  This application meets the needs 
expressed in the Report. 
 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
5 
 
 
 
 
3.e. Approach 
 
3.e.1 Preliminary Studies 
Relationship between insomnia and suicidal ideation during a 10-week clinical trial conducted by Dr McCall  
Eighty adults completed the first week of baseline assessment. Of these, 48 were free of all prescribed 
psychotropics at the initial screening, 10 were taking a hypnotic, 12 were taking an antidepressant, and 10 
were taking both an antidepressant and a hypnotic without success. All 32 patients taking an antidepressant or 
hypnotic at screening were successfully tapered off those medications before the first visit, and were contacted 
daily by the research staff during the taper. After a week of baseline assessment, patients received one week 
of open-label fluoxetine (FLX) monotherapy, starting at 20 mg in the morning. Patients who were still 
experiencing insomnia after one week of FLX continued with 8 more weeks of open label FLX, and were 
randomly assigned to also receive either the hypnotic eszopiclone (ESZ) 3 mg or placebo given on a double-
blind basis at bedtime. Patients who still had a 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD24) 58 >15 
at the end of 4 weeks of randomized treatment could choose to take 40 mg FLX for the next 4 weeks. Study 
endpoints included measures of sleep, mood, and suicidal ideation. Insomnia severity was graded by the 
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI).59 Suicidal ideation was measured with the Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI). 60-62 
 
Participants were 18-70 years old, with either (a) sleep latency > 30 minutes and sleep efficiency < 85% at 
least 4 nights per week, or (b) met Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) insomnia criteria for at least 4 nights 
per week. 63  All participants met a DSM-IV diagnosis of unipolar MDE per Structured Clinical Interview for 
DSM-IV (SCID), 64 with a Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score >24, 65 and a HRSD24 score > 20. 58  All 
participants completed one night of baseline polysomnogram (PSG) which showed no clinically significant 
sleep apnea (Apnea/Hypopneas index >15) or Periodic Limb Movement Disorder (PLM arousal index >15), 
following standard measurement procedures described elsewhere. 66    
 
Sixty participants were randomized out of the original 80 consented patients, and 51 of these completed the 
final assessment during randomization. The average age of the randomized sample was 41.5 + 12.5 years, 
and 66% were women, with 23.2% minorities. At baseline, the average HRSD24 score was 27.1 + 3.9, and the 
average ISI score was 20.7 + 4.0.  Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI) scores were analyzed using generalized 
linear mixed models for repeated measures with predictor variables being insomnia (ISI scores), the mood 
item, and the anhedonia item from the HRSD24. Baseline SSI was 3.7 + 5.2, with 55% having a SSI score >1, 
and 37% of patients having a SSI score > 3. If only the individuals with baseline SSI > 1 are considered, then 
the average baseline SSI score was 6.8 + 5.3.  
 
The model with ISI as the predictor for SSI was significant with the regression coefficient corresponding to ISI 
being positive (β=0.055, SE=0.02, p<0.01). Other univariate models found that the depressed mood item was 
also a significant predictor of suicidal ideation (p<0.005), but anhedonia was not a predictor of suicidal ideation 
(p=0.9). A multivariate model simultaneously including both the insomnia and the depressed mood items found 
that both were independent predictors of suicidal ideation (both p<0.05). Our findings confirm that the intensity 
of insomnia predicts intensity of suicidal ideas during a clinical trial of MDE, even after adjusting for  depressed 
mood and anhedonia.9  
 
Actigraphic differences between suicidal and non-suicidal patients 
Novel statistical methods based on functional data analysis were applied to averaged actigraphy data to 
compare circadian activity levels between the suicidal group (SSI>0) and non-suicidal group (SSI=0).67 
Functional data analysis smoothes raw actigraphy data into continuous curves, and the curves are placed into 
the context of the time of day when the data were collected. Statistical testing comparison of curves can then  

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
6 
 
be conducted across times. In Figure 2, diurnal patterning of activity at baseline is similar for suicidal and non-
suicidal patients, with blue for SSI>0, red for SSI=0. However, one week of fluoxetine resulted in a significantly 
decreased activity level in the baseline-suicidal group between 4-6PM (Figure 3, p<0.05), previously reported 
as a peak time for suicide attempts.68 The intensity of suicidal ideation also dropped during this week (Figure 
4), suggesting that deceases in actigraphic activity may be a biomarker of early anti-suicide effect. 
 
                        Figure 2 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 3 
 
Figure 4 
Effect of Hypnotic Therapy on Suicidal Ideation  
 
SSI scores dropped in both the hypnotic and placebo groups during 
the trial, but were better in the end of treatment in those patients assigned to 
the hypnotic eszopiclone.  If all randomized patients are considered, the 
adjusted standard deviation for post treatment SSI was 2.0 with an adjusted 
difference between treatment groups of 0.6, with the hypnotic group having 
lower (better) scores. Among  the 55% of patients with baseline SSI > 1,  the 
unadjusted post treatment SSI means were 1.86 and 0.41 in the placebo and 
hypnotic groups, respectively, with an adjusted treatment difference of 1.3 
(p=NS). We conclude that treatment of insomnia with hypnotics among 
depressed patients with suicidal ideation taking SSRIs has promise in 
reducing suicidal ideation. 
 
Importantly, no patients made any suicide attempts. One participant became sufficiently suicidal that we 
removed that individual from randomized treatment and offered standard clinical management. In sum, our 
participant safety protocols, as described later, succeeded. 
 
Dysfunctional beliefs about sleep are related to suicidal ideation 
We hypothesize (Figure 1) that the relationship between insomnia and suicide was mediated through 
dysfunctional beliefs about sleep. We have collected new cross-sectional data on 50 adults (mean 55 y.o.) in 
various stages of active depression or recovery, including 16 psychiatric inpatients and 23 outpatients and 11 
emergency psychiatry patients in the Wake Forest Emergency Department. Dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes 
about sleep (DBAS) were measured with the DBAS scale,49;69 while the intensity of suicidal ideation was 
measured with SSI,60-62 and hopelessness was measured with the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS).70;71 There 
was no collinearity between BHS and DBAS (Pearson’s r=0.05). DBAS was significantly related to SSI (r=0.49, 
p<0.01), and in a multivariate model, both hopelessness (p<0.05) and dysfunctional beliefs about sleep 
(p<0.01) made independent contributions to the prediction of suicidal ideation. These results support the 
premise that DBAS mediates insomnia as a risk factor for suicidal ideation. Using a receiver operating curve, 
we also found that emergency psychiatry patients are best discriminated from outpatients by a SSI score of 16. 
 
 
 
Change in Suicide Severity Index in 
Patients with Baseline SSI >0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SSI baseline
SSI end of one week FLX
SSI score
SSI score
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SSI baseline
SSI end of one week FLX
SSI score
SSI score

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
7 
 
 
Duke University Department of Psychiatry Procedures in Recruiting Depressed Outpatients 
Duke has an extensive history in recruiting depressed insomniacs for clinical trials, and taking a leadership role 
in the analysis and reporting of the results.72;73 All patients with major depression who contact Duke with an 
interest in participating in research or who are referred for clinical treatment are screened by a team with 
information about all ongoing trials.  Those who are appropriate will be referred by the centralized assessment 
team to our study personnel, who will screen them for possible enrollment.   This centralized service has 
dramatically increased enrollment in depression studies since its inception 4 months ago, processing over 15 
new depressed patients every week.   Further, the proposed trial will be referred all suicidal depressed 
subjects screened by the centralized assessment service as there are no current or anticipated studies at Duke 
enrolling suicidal patients with depression.  Steps to decrease subject dropout and facilitate adherence to the 
study protocol include: reminder phone calls prior to visits; careful review of all study procedures with subjects; 
careful education about potential side-effects of treatments and what to do if side-effects occur; and 
compensating subjects ($50) for each visit and covering the costs of parking incurred during study 
participation.  Dr. Krystal has consistently achieved his subject recruitment targets in prior trials in patients with 
insomnia and/or major depression. 
University of Wisconsin (UW) Department of Psychiatry in Recruiting Depressed Outpatients 
Subjects will be recruited via advertisements (newspaper, internet, newsletters, local postings), referrals from 
patient advocacy/support groups, and from the UW Sleep Disorders Center and Department of Psychiatry.  
Clinicians, including co-investigators in this study, may inform patients about the study, either verbally or with 
printed materials. The UW Department of Psychiatry sees at least 35 new patients per week with depression, 
and the Sleep Disorders Center sees approximately 10 patients per week with insomnia, 25% of who have 
concomitant mood disorders. UW has had significant success recruiting and retaining depressed subjects 
through clinical avenues and advertisements.  In an ongoing study of sleep deprivation and depressed mood, 
UW recruited 57 depressed patients over 2 years, 40 of whom completed the trial. Like GHSU and Duke, UW 
will facilitate adherence to the protocol by reminder phone calls prior to visits; careful review of all procedures 
with subjects; careful education about potential side-effects of treatments and what to do if side-effects occur; 
and compensating subjects ($50) for each visit and covering the costs of parking. 
 
METHODS 
 
3.e.2. OVERVIEW 
This four-year, multi-site clinical trial will include 3 recruiting sites (GRU, Duke, University of Wisconsin-
Madison) and one coordinating site (GRU). Each site will randomize 11.5 outpatients per year for 4 years, 
yielding a total of 138 participants (3X4X11.5=138). Participants must be English speaking and meet research 
criteria for both MDE and insomnia, and will also endorse moderate suicidal ideation with baseline Scale for 
Suicide Ideation (SSI) > 3. After a one-week baseline which includes a screen for sleep apnea, participants 
who satisfy all inclusion and exclusion requirements will receive open label SSRI for 4 weeks, with an option to 
increase the dose of the SSRI for weeks 5-8.  Persons with suicidal intent (SSI >15 and Columbia-Suicide 
Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) suicidal ideation level of 4 or 5 in the last week 74) will be excluded.   
Participants will also be randomized to receive either ZOL 6.25 mg or placebo 15 minutes before bedtime each 
night while receiving open label SSRI in the morning for the first week Patients who still have insomnia, but no 
side effects at the end of the first week of treatment may have their ZOL increased to 12.5 mg Suicidal 
thinking, mood symptoms, insomnia, hopelessness, and dysfunctional beliefs about insomnia will be measured 
at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 of randomized treatment. Participants will be contacted by telephone 
mid-week for weeks 1-2, and weekly for weeks 3, 5, and 7, and will be invited to come in for an additional face-
to-face assessment if there are concerns about worsening suicidal ideas. A comprehensive safety plan is 
outlined in 6.d.   ZOL/placebo will be stopped at the end of the treatment period as (1) sleep benefits may be 
continued in depressed insomniacs after a hypnotic is stopped,75 and (2) most participants in our pilot study 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
8 
 
preferred stopping their hypnotic after 8 weeks of randomized treatment.76  Participants will be referred for 
standard outpatient management at the end of 8 weeks of randomized care, with the option of receiving a 
SSRI prescription at the end of the trial until they re-enter usual care. We will also provide two weekly follow-up 
visits after discontinuation of ZOL to assess transition and provide continuity of care until the first care-as-usual 
visit. Weekly phone calls will be made after the last visit until the patient has connected with their care provider.      
   
 
Figure 5 
 
Multi-site coordination and Data Management 
The project will begin with an investigators’ and project managers’ meeting for reviewing the protocol and 
standardizing the delivery of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD).  HRSD ratings will be 
conducted by project managers, who will demonstrate agreement of 0.85 on criterion videotapes.  All study 
investigators and study personnel will meet annually to review protocol elements and re-calibrate objective 
clinical ratings. Decisions regarding recruitment obstacles, unexpected protocol problems, etc, will be handled 
by the study Executive Committee (site PIs), chaired by Dr McCall, and the Executive Committee will have a 
monthly teleconference. A Steering Committee comprised of all principal and co-investigators will participate in 
the monthly teleconference. A Publications committee will approve all publications resulting from this project; 
and all principal investigators shall have access to all data.   
 
A website will be created to facilitate communication and allow all study personnel to access a secure web-
based data management system for data collection and participant tracking.  The web-based system allows 
great flexibility in processing data management tasks including the ability to register participants and verify 
eligibility criteria prior to registration, real-time monitoring and reporting of accrual, retention and intervention 
adherence and participant follow-up tracking.  The website will contain general information about depression, 
insomnia, and this study which will be available to the public, and a password-protected area for members of 
the study team (e.g., study protocol, MOP, and data collection forms).   Using this system, research personnel 
can interact with data using web forms that mimic paper forms. The website will be designed with input from 
the research staff so that the workflow follows the protocol and is in line with trial conduct. Website activity will 
be monitored and audited for security purposes. Users may view detailed tracking and management 
information for each participant and/or by assessment time point or follow-up visit. When research staff 
accesses the website, upcoming participant assessments/visits are presented so that participant management 
is easily accessible. Once logged in, research staff may run reports, enter forms, review and edit data, and 
access trial-specific documents. As data are entered, validations rules are applied before data are saved. 
Inconsistencies are noted for staff to resolve.  Research staff can resolve many queries immediately by 
comparing the screen to the form.   
 
3.e.3. Participants 
Participants will be outpatients recruited from local newspaper ads, posters, and normal clinical avenues. 
Potential participants will be pre-screened by telephone, and if eligible will be invited to the medical center for a 
face-to-face screening assessment. Participants will be 18-65 years of age, free of all psychotropic 
medications for one week before baseline assessment, except that prior FLX treatment will require 4 weeks of 
abstinence, and MAOIs will require 2 weeks of abstinence.  The local project manager will confirm a DSM-IV-
TR diagnosis of MDE by SCID, and a Research Diagnostic Criteria diagnosis of insomnia.63  All participants 
will meet the following severity criteria: HRSD24> 20, ISI >7, and reported habitual sleep latency > 30 minutes 
or wake time in the middle of the night of > 30 minutes, and sleep efficiency < 85%.  Patients will not have a 
Placebo +SSRI 
Zolpidem CR + SSRI 
Follow up 
Phone call 
Baseline  
Follow up 
office visit 
Sleep Apnea screening 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
9 
 
clinical diagnosis of dementia, will have MMSE > 24, and provide their own written, informed consent to 
participate. The difficulty in defining a sample of persons with suicidal ideation who have sufficient severity of 
suicidal ideation to be clinically relevant, yet not so severe as to constitute undue danger to their participation 
in a randomized trial, was the focus of a very recent  editorial.77 We have addressed this problem by defining 
participants as those with SSI score > 3 but <15, and those with SSI > 15, but with C-SSRS suicidal ideation 
level less than 4 or 5.74. This defines patients with moderate suicidal ideation and no expressed intent to 
commit suicide. We justify this because suicidal emergency psychiatry patients are differentiated from 
psychiatric outpatients by a SSI score of 16, using received operating curves (AUC=0.95, p<0.0001). 
 
Participants will be excluded if they have an active or past diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse, bipolar 
disorder, schizophrenia per the SCID, or a prior sleep laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of a primary sleep 
disorder such as sleep apnea or periodic limb movement disorder.  Clinical judgment, combining both historical 
information and urine drug screens, will be used to determine exclusion for alcohol or substance abuse.  We 
will record the Epworth Sleepiness Scale Score, but it will not be a basis for exclusion.78 We will exclude 
patients with BMI > 40 and during the one-week baseline participants will complete a screening test for sleep 
apnea, using a two channel recording of airflow and respiratory effort. Persons who screen positive for 
moderate-severe sleep apnea (AHI >10)66 will be excluded and referred for clinical management of sleep 
disorders. 
 
3.e.4. Treatment 
We anticipate that >50% of participants will already be free of psychotropic medications at the first phone 
screen. If not, the research team will oversee a taper schedule for their current psychotropics, coupled with 
daily phone calls for safety, so that these patients also will be medication-free at their first visit. Participants 
who pass all screening and baseline-week assessments will immediately begin treatment with open-label SSRI 
according to the Table below, and will be randomized to ZOL controlled release (CR) versus placebo. 
Participants will receive only enough pills to last until the next scheduled research assessment.  Research 
prescriptions will be written by a study psychiatrist and will be filled by a university research pharmacy. 
 
Randomization to ZOL-CR or placebo 
Randomized medication (ZOL-CR and placebo) will be prepared by the research pharmacy as identically-
appearing capsules.  Women and men randomized to ZOL-CR will begin their treatment with ZOL-CR 6.25 mg 
to be taken 15 minutes before bedtime. Both men and women will be advised that the FDA has expressed 
concerns about drowsiness after ZOL while driving or operating machinery, especially in the morning and 
especially in women. Participants will be instructed to call the study team immediately if they experience a side 
effect with study medications. Each post-randomization visit will include a standardized assessment of the 
presence or absence of drowsiness while driving or operating dangerous machinery, any accidents or injuries, 
and if any injuries or accidents occurred, then the time of day and relationship to the timing of the last ZOL 
dose. Patient adherence to waiting at least 8 hours after ZOL before driving or operating equipment will be 
confirmed. 
 
At the end of the first week, if the patient (1) does not report drowsy driving or drowsy equipment use, nor 
accidents or injuries attributable to drowsiness, and if (2) the patient’s insomnia has not resolved as evidenced 
by an insomnia severity index score > 7,59 then the patient and study psychiatrist may elect to increase the 
ZOL-CR dose to 12.5 mg. If at any time during the study a patient is taking ZOL-CR 12.5 mg and experiences 
drowsy driving or drowsy use of dangerous equipment, or an injury or accident attributable to ZOL-CR 12.5 
mg, then the dosage should be immediately reduced to 6.25 mg. A second dosage increase back to 12.5 mg 
may be allowed if it is clear that ZOL was not the source of prior side effects of sleepiness.  
 
The study psychiatrist will be provided with that day’s HRSD24 and SSI scores at each visit, and before writing 
prescriptions for the next interval. The SSI score will be used for further safety assessments, detailed later. At 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
10 
 
the end of week 4, the study psychiatrist can increase the dose of the SSRI according to Table 1, if the 
HRSD24 score is >15 and if the participant concurs. Randomized treatment assignment will remain disguised 
at the end of treatment, but the study psychiatrist may continue to prescribe open-label SSRI until the first post-
randomization usual-care visit.  Treatment fidelity will be assessed by the project manager at each visit by pill 
counts of SSRI and ZOL/Placebo.  Blinding fidelity will be assessed at the end of participation as the patient, 
project manager, and study psychiatrist each complete a ‘best guess’ questionnaire. 
 
Table 1. 
SSRI Dosing 
SSRI 
Dose for weeks 1-4 (mg) 
Option Dose Increase for weeks 5-8 (mg) 
Fluoxetine 
20 
40 
Sertraline 
50 
100 
Paroxetine 
20 
40 
Citalopram 
20 
40 
 
 
Protocol Deviations and Protocol Violations  
Protocol deviations (PD) and protocol violations (PV) are similar in that both reflect a variation in the conduct of 
the study that is not consistent with the approved protocol and/or the Study Manual.  However, PD and PV 
differ in that PD is said to occur when the patient fails to follow the protocol or Study Manual, while a PV is said 
to occur when the investigative team fails to follow the protocol or the Study Manual. In either instance, the 
CRF for PD/PV should be completed both as a paper CRF and on-line.  By itself, the occurrence of a PD or PV 
does not automatically result in the dismissal of the patient from the study. If the local investigative site is 
considering dismissing a participant because of a PD or PV, then the study staff should first confer with Dr. 
McCall. Regardless of whether the patient is dismissed or retained after a PD or PV, the local investigative 
team should collect all scheduled data for the next scheduled visit.  
 
3.e.5. General considerations regarding psychometric measurement 
Each treatment visit by the patient will begin with the project manager. The project manager will interview the 
patient for the HRSD24 and SSI blinded to treatment, and will then oversee the patient’s completion of the self-
report ISI. The project manager will avoid soliciting side effects and adverse events that may contribute to their 
unblinding. The project manager will then bring the participant, along with the HRSD24 and SSI scores, to the 
study psychiatrist for safety assessments and writing prescriptions. The psychiatrist does not provide any 
assessments of mood, insomnia, or suicidal ideation. 
 
3.e.6. Measurement of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior 
The SSI consists of 19 items that evaluate active suicidal desire, specific plans for suicide, and passive suicidal 
desire.60-62 Each item is rated on a 3-point scale from 0 to 2 for a maximum score of 38; a lower score indicates 
less severe suicidal ideation.   The SSI will be collected by the project manager at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 
4, 6, and 8 of randomized treatment, and once by telephone one month after completing randomized 
treatment.  An SSI score >2 predicts eventual suicide death over a period of years.4 The SSI will be collected 
at the start of each visit, before the participant is seen by the study psychiatrist. 
 
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)74 is based upon the Columbia Classification Algorithm 
of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA).79 This C-SSRS is used by the FDA in clinical trials to assess suicide risk, 
and includes a structured assessment of past or recent suicidal behavior.  It will be administered at each visit 
by a study psychiatrist blinded to treatment assignment. C-CASA has excellent inter-rater reliability in 
classifying suicide attempts, with an overall intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.89. Other pharmacologic 
clinical trials in samples of suicidal patients have excluded patients from participation on the basis of intent to 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
11 
 
commit suicide,80;81 and this is represented in the C-SSRS as a suicidal ideation score of 4 or 5 in the last 
week.  
 
3.e.7. Measurement of Insomnia 
The participants will complete the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 of 
randomized treatment, and at follow-up visits and phone calls after completing randomized treatment.59  The 
ISI is a 7-item questionnaire, with each item scored 0-4, for a maximum of 28 points. Items are scaled 
according to the degree of dissatisfaction with sleep, in contrast to a sleep diary, which measures the 
dimension of time spent awake or asleep. Higher scores on the ISI represent more insomnia, and scores >7 
indicate a clinically-relevant degree of insomnia.  Successful treatment will be defined as final SSI <7. 
Participants will also complete a daily, morning sleep diary during randomized treatment, which to capture 
reported bed time, rise time, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, number of awakenings, and total sleep 
time. 
 
 
3.e.8. Measurement of Actigraphy 
The participants will wear an actigraph on their non-dominant wrist for the duration of the randomized 
treatment. Estimates of sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, and total sleep time will be obtained from the 
medium sensitivity setting at 30-second epochs, as described in our prior research.76 We have previously 
reported that actigraphy tracks polysomnography reasonably-well in depressed insomniacs.82 Actigraphic data 
will also be archived for potential future additional data analysis (functional analysis) as described above.67 
 
3.e.9. Measurement of Depression 
Depression severity will be tracked by the observer-rated 24-item HRSD. 58;83  The HRSD24 will be 
administered by same project manager, blind to treatment assignment, at baseline and thereafter at weeks 1, 
2, 4, 6, and 8 of randomized treatment, and once by telephone one month after completing randomized 
treatment.  Research staff will demonstrate inter-rater reliability > 0.85 against a criterion-set of clinical 
videotapes.   The HRSD24 has three sleep items and one suicide item. The HRSD will be recorded as the total 
score (HRSD24), and will also be analyzed without the three sleep items or the suicide item (HRSD20).  The 
three insomnia items and the suicide item will be separately examined. 
 
3.e.10. Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep 
The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes Scale (DBAS) captures the most common distorted beliefs about sleep 
reported by insomniacs, with a set of 30 items. 84  Eighteen items tap themes of hopelessness related to 
insomnia, or fear of catastrophic outcomes from insomnia.48-51  We hypothesize that the DBAS scale will be a 
mediator of insomnia’s influence on suicidal ideation. The DBAS will be assessed at each visit. 
 
3.e.11. Beck Hopelessness Scale 
The Beck Hopelessness Scale is a 20-item scale that assesses pessimism and negative expectancies for the 
future with demonstrated validity across a wide age range.71;85;85  Among adolescents and adults, it predicts 
future suicidal behavior.70;86;87 86;87  This measure takes 5 minutes to administer, and is completed by the 
patient.  Hopelessness will be considered as a potential exploratory mediating variable for understanding the 
effect of insomnia treatment on suicidal ideation. It will be assessed at each visit. 
 
3.e.12. The Disturbing Dreams and Nightmare Severity Scale 
The frequency and intensity of disturbing dreams and nightmares will be measured with the Disturbing Dreams 
and Nightmare Severity Scale (DDNSI). This scale is derivative of a simpler Nightmare Frequency 
Questionnaire that had a test-retest weighted kappa>0.85.88 The revised DDNSI has good internal consistency 
with a Cohen’s alpha >0.80.16;18 Each participant will complete this self-report scale. Nightmares, like insomnia, 
have been linked in epidemiologic studies to suicidal ideation, yet an impact of hypnotics on pre-existing 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
12 
 
nightmares has not been well described. It will be assessed at each visit. 
 
3.e.13. Measurement of health related quality of life (HRQOL) 
We have previously shown that depressed insomniacs taking eszopiclone have superior scores on the two 
HRQOL subscales of the Basis-32 (the daily living and role functioning (DLRF) subscale and relationship to 
self and others subscale (RSO) compared to  placebo, and that women report superior HRQOL outcomes 
compared with men. The Basis-32 has good psychometric properties.89;90 It will be assessed at each visit. 
 
3.e.14 Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global  Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) 
The participants’ overall clinical status and response to treatment will be assessed with the CGI-S and CGI-I. 
Both scales will be rated along a 7-point dimension. The CGI-S and CGI-I will be completed by a study 
psychiatrist. The CGI-S will be scored from “Normal” to “Among the most severely ill”, while the CGI-S will be 
scored from “Very much improved” to “very much worse” The CGI-S will be completed at baseline and at all 
randomized treatment visits, while the CGI-I will be completed only during post-randomization treatment visits.  
 
3.e.15 Reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire, and the Seasonal Pattern Assessment 
Questionnaire These two questionnaires are self-report instrument designed to assess how patient’s sleep-
wake propensity varies with time of day, and with season. Both forms will be self-administered at baseline and 
at the end of randomized treatment.  
 
3.e.16 Treatment resistance 
The participants’ response or resistance to pharmacotherapy in the present episode of illness will be measured 
by a modification of the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) and a Hypnotic Treatment History 
Form (HTHF) 
 
3.e.17 Adverse events 
Each post-randomization visit will include a standardized assessment of the presence or absence of 
drowsiness while driving or operating dangerous machinery, any accidents or injuries, and if any injuries or 
accidents occurred, then the time of day and relationship to the timing of the last ZOL dose. Patient adherence 
to waiting at least 8 hours after ZOL before driving or operating equipment will be confirmed.   Additionally, the 
study psychiatrist will elicit spontaneous reports of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) at 
each treatment visit. In the unexpected event of potentially self-injurious behavior, the behavior will be coded 
as a suicide attempt according to the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)74, which in turn is 
based upon the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA) 79. The C-CASA will be 
completed by the study psychiatrist and has excellent inter-rater reliability in classifying suicide attempts, with 
an overall intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.89. 
 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
3.f. Objectives  
The primary aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial is to assess the effect of ZOL on suicidal ideation 
in patients who are experiencing suicidal ideation at baseline. It is expected that 67% of participants will be 
women. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be stratified by site, gender and history of prior suicide 
attempts, and then randomized to receive SSRI with either ZOL or a placebo with equal probability.  The 
primary end point is suicidal ideation assessed repeatedly across 8 weeks after randomization with ZOL versus 
placebo.  Secondary aims are to assess the effect of ZOL on hopelessness, dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes 
about sleep, and nightmares, and whether these measures mediated the reduction in suicidal ideation seen 
with ZOL.   Tertiary aims will confirm our prior report that treatment of insomnia improves HRQOL while 
improving sleep and depression symptoms. Health-related quality of life will be measured with the Daily Living 
and Role Functioning (DLRF) Scale, with the change scores for DLRF contrasted by gender. Reported sleep 
will be measured by the ISI and sleep diaries, while actigraphy will provide an objective estimate of sleep.  

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
13 
 
Depression symptoms will be measured with the HRSD.  Analysis of all outcome measures will be carried out 
based on an ‘intent to treat’ approach.  
 
3.g. Study Design 
A double-blind, randomized, parallel group design will be used to assess the effect of ZOL on the SSI.  As 
discussed below, the primary analysis for assessing the main effect of ZOL on SSI will be a mixed model 
analysis of covariance with treatment and baseline SSI as fixed covariates.  Under the assumption of 
compound symmetry, this test is equivalent to an analysis of covariance on the mean post-treatment SSI with 
the baseline level as the covariate.   Thus, the sample sizes needed to detect clinically meaningful differences 
between treatment groups can be determined using formulae based on t-tests, where the standard deviation 
for the post-treatment mean is adjusted by its correlation with baseline levels.  To ensure that the trial is not 
continued if one therapy is clearly superior, a three-stage group sequential design (i.e., two interim analyses 
and one final analysis) will be employed to allow interim monitoring of the data while the trial is ongoing using 
stopping boundaries that are intermediate to those proposed by Pocock and O’Brien and Fleming in the 
likelihood of stopping at the first stage (see Human Subjects for details). The S-Plus module S+SeqTrial 2 
(2006) was used to determine the stopping boundaries and the sample size at each stage.  Based on our 
preliminary data, the standard deviation (SD) for SSI for the patients meeting the eligibility criteria for this study 
was 3.1, somewhat higher than the 2.7 found in our previous randomized pilot study.  Assuming conservatively 
that the SD will be 3.1 in the proposed study, and additionally assuming two interim looks and a drop-out rate 
of 20%, the total sample sizes to detect differences in SSI ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 between treatment groups 
with 80-95% power at the 5% two-sided level of significance are shown in Table 1.  
 
Table 1.  Total sample size needed to detect  
specified differences in SSI assuming 20%  
dropout and two interim looks. 
A total sample size of 138 patients will allow us to detect a 
difference of 2 units in SSI between the two groups with 90% 
power. In our previous pilot study, the adjusted treatment 
difference was 1.3, but the upper bound on the confidence 
interval was 3.5, so an effect of 2 units is consistent with the 
pilot data. Further differences in SSI >2 represent risk for future 
suicide death.4 
 
 
 
3.h. Power for Secondary and Exploratory Outcome Measures 
A secondary aim is to assess whether reductions in suicidal ideation in depressed insomniacs are mediated 
through reductions in hopelessness, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, or nightmare intensity.  Analyses are 
described below.  We calculate the approximate power for detecting mediation effects according to methods 
provided by Vittinghoff et al.91  The power depends on the sample size (assumed to be 110, or 80% of 138), 
effect of treatment (assumes as 2.0), the correlation between treatment and the mediation variable, the 
residual variance of the outcome (assumed as 3.0), and the proportion of the treatment effect explained (PTE) 
by the mediator.  We do not know the correlation between treatment and the mediator, so we consider a range 
between .05 and .3 (the correlation between treatment and the outcome was approximately .2) and calculate 
power for PTE values between .1 and .8 (see Table 2).  We have adequate power (>80%) for detecting 
mediation effects of .33 or higher as long as the correlation between treatment and the mediation variables are 
.2 or less. 
Table 2.  Power for detecting mediation effects.  
 
PTE 
Correlation 
.1 
.2 
.3 
.4 
.5 
.6 
.7 
.8 
Absolute 
Difference 
80% 
Power 
90% 
Power 
95% 
Power 
1.5 
183 
244 
302 
1.6 
162 
215 
265 
1.7 
143 
190 
235 
1.8 
127 
170 
210 
1.9 
114 
152 
188 
2.0 
103 
138 
170 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
14 
 
.05 
.94 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
.10 
.41 
.94 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
.20 
.13 
.40 
.73 
.93 
.99 
>.99 
>.99 
>.99 
.30 
.08 
.20 
.38 
.60 
.79 
.92 
.99 
>.99 
 
Tertiary outcomes include health-related quality of life, reported sleep, actigraphically-measured sleep, and 
depression symptoms.  Baseline means and standard deviations observed in our pilot study for these 
measures are shown in Table 3.  Assuming conservatively that a t-test will be done to compare the post-
treatment means between treatment groups, the absolute and relative differences detectable with 80% and 
90% power are shown in Table 3.  (We will actually have repeated measures and the SD will be adjusted for 
baseline values, both of which will increase our power.)  With a sample size of approximately 55 evaluable 
patients per group (after 20% dropout), we can detect relative differences of less than 23% in each secondary 
outcome with at least 80% power.  The power for detecting gender effects will be similar to the power for 
detecting treatment effects (as shown in Table 2), assuming the gender ratio is between 0.5 and 2.0.   (For 
example, power is only reduced from 80% to 75% for a gender ratio of 2 compared to a ratio of 1.)   
 
Table 3.  Differences detectable in selected tertiary outcome measures with 80% and 90% power at the 5% 
two-sided level of significance. 
 
 
80% Power 
90% Power 
Outcome 
Mean (SD) 
Absolute  
Relative (%)* 
Absolute 
Relative (%)* 
DLRF 
  2.0 (0.7) 
0.38 
19.0% 
0.44 
22.0% 
RSO 
1.9 (0.8) 
0.43 
22.6% 
0.50 
26.3% 
ISI  
20.7 (4.0) 
2.16 
10.4% 
2.50 
12.1% 
HRSD24 
27.1 (3.9) 
2.10 
  7.7% 
2.43 
  9.0% 
* Relative to control group mean assuming no change in that group                                                                               
DLRF= Daily living and role functioning; RSO=Relationship to self and others; ISI=Insomnia Severity Index; 
HRSD24=Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 24 item                                                                                                   
 
3.i. Randomization 
At baseline, all participants will be classified as either having a prior life-time suicide attempt or not, according 
to C-SSRS.74   Participants will be stratified by site, sex, and prior history of suicide attempts and randomized 
within strata to receive ZOL or placebo with equal probability, using variably sized permuted block 
randomization to ensure approximately equal accrual to each treatment throughout the study.  Block sizes of 
varying length will be determined randomly to ensure that future assignments cannot be inferred from past 
assignments.  Treatment assignments will be generated using nQuery Advisor 6.0 and incorporated into a 
randomization table which can be accessed by the study coordinator via the study’s website.     
 
3.j. Statistical Analyses 
SSI will be measured at baseline and weekly for 8 weeks.  The primary analysis will be a mixed model analysis 
of covariance to assess treatment differences in mean post-treatment SSI and after adjusting for baseline SSI 
and design parameters such as clinic site and sex, and pretreatment patient characteristics such as age and 
weight.  Adjustments will be made to ensure the analyses match the design, to correct for chance imbalances 
in important prognostic factors and to improve precision of group comparisons by accounting for variance from 
variability in patient characteristics.  Regression diagnostics, residual plots, and exploratory analyses will be 
done to find appropriate transformations to satisfy the 1) linearity, 2) homogeneity of variances, and 3) 
normality assumptions.  While we assume compound symmetry for the correlation among repeated measures, 
we will also consider other covariance patterns, and the appropriate covariate structure will be chosen based 
on likelihood ratio tests for nested models and the Akaike Information Criterion for non-nested models. 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
15 
 
To measure the persistence of the treatment effect on insomnia (the ISI) and suicidal ideation (the SSI) 4 
weeks after randomized treatment ends, ANCOVA will be used to assess intervention differences in primary 
and secondary outcomes.  Covariates will include the value of the outcome at 8 weeks, an indicator for 
intervention group, an indicator variable defining the pre-randomization stratifying factors (e.g. clinical center), 
and possibly other pre-randomization values of factors known to be predictive of the outcomes or sustainability. 
Participants who failed to connect with their care-as-usual referral at the end of randomized treatment, or who 
are highly symptomatic or suicidal (SSI items > 15) will be called back in to visit the research team for further 
assistance and bridging care until the care-as-usual referral is completed. 
 
Despite best efforts, there are likely to be missing end point measurements due to missed visits or patients 
drop outs.  Participants will be encouraged to remain in the trial, even if they need to reduce or discontinue 
their treatment; data also will be collected from individuals who refuse treatment. However, it is unlikely that we 
will obtain complete data.  Thus, logistic regression models will be used to determine which covariates are 
predictive of missingness, and these covariates will be included in the outcome analyses to reduce the 
potential bias caused by dropouts.  We will analyze the data using SAS Proc Mixed, a program that provides 
several computational methods for obtaining maximum likelihood estimates for repeated measures problems, 
allows for unbalanced designs, missing data at some times, structured or unstructured covariance matrices, 
and growth curve parameterizations of time effects.  A maximum likelihood approach is appropriate if data are 
missing at random.  If, however, the data are not missing at random, data analysis is more difficult and 
inferences must be made cautiously.  Sensitivity analyses will be done to examine the effects that assumptions 
about missing data have on the results. These same analyses will be used to assess the effect of treatment on 
the tertiary outcome measures. 
 
A secondary objective is to examine whether reduced suicidal ideation in depressed insomniacs is mediated 
through reduced dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, reduced hopelessness, or fewer nightmares. Scatterplots 
will be used to visualize the relationship between suicidal ideation and hopelessness, dysfunctional beliefs 
about sleep, and nightmares with different smoothed fits for the different interventions.  Mediation analysis will 
be used to determine the degree to which hopelessness, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep and nightmares 
(separately and collectively) are responsible for (or mediate) the changes in suicidal ideation.  Several methods 
have been proposed to overcome shortcomings in the original methods proposed by Baron and Kenny.92  
Several methods are compared by MacKinnon et al and summarized by Krause et al.93;94   Several of these 
methods had similar operating characteristics and will be explored in our study, including assessing the 
product of the coefficients describing the relationship between treatment and the mediator and the mediator 
and the outcome,95;96 and jointly testing the two coefficients.97  In addition, we will explore the use of multi-level 
models and longitudinal mediation models, and consider lagged models which include previous measures of 
the mediation variables with future measures of suicidal ideation.  
As an exploratory outcome, we will archive actigraphy data for future functional analysis to examine whether 
early decreases in actigraphy serves as a biomarker of an early anti-suicide effect. 
 
3.k. WFBH Data Management / Statistical Center 
 
Wake Forest Baptist Health, through the Department of Biostatistics in the Division of Public Health Sciences 
will be responsible for providing data management and statistical support for this study.  WFBH will not see 
participants nor receive protected health information from the sites.  Specifically, WFBH will: 
1) Develop a web-site to store study documents and reports and to promote communication amongst 
project investigators. 
2) Create web-based data entry forms that mimic the CRFs 
3) Implement data validation error checks and generate error messages for site coordinators 
4) Store study data; ensure security and confidentiality 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
16 
 
5) Generate randomization and provide online randomization facility 
6) Develop online reports for patient accrual and data completeness/quality 
7) Generate interim reports for DSMB (described below) 
8) Provide analyses and collaborate in manuscript development (described above) 
 
Data handling and management.   
 
The full electronic database will contain the participant’s unique study identifier and some date elements (such 
as visit date), but will otherwise be clean of identifiers. A key at the sites will link the study identifier to 
participants’ personal identifiers for participants recruited at that site. This key will be housed at each site with 
the consent forms in the study binder. Data entry will be performed at each site by trained research staff with 
valid confidentiality agreements. 
 
The web-based data management system used for REST-IT will incorporate functionality we have developed 
for other research studies such as Look AHEAD, ACCORD, ACCORD MIND, LIFE, and SPRINT, among 
others.  This system has substantial functionality in major areas such as security and authentication, user 
access management, calendar functionality, directory, document, and committee management and dynamic 
reporting.  Electronic data being entered by research staff are immediately transmitted to a secure server at the 
Coordinating Center, where data will reside throughout the study.  The web-based system allows great 
flexibility in processing data management tasks, including the ability to register participants and verify eligibility 
criteria before randomization; provide the randomization assignment; allow real-time monitoring and reporting 
of accrual, retention, and intervention adherence; and track participant phone calls and follow-ups. If needed, 
data can be securely downloaded directly by study team members for use in analyses. There will also be 
public areas of the website for posting of non-secured information available to the general public.  
 
The web-based system allows research personnel to interact with data using web forms that mimic paper 
ones. The website will be designed with input from the research staff so that the workflow follows the protocol 
and is in line with how the trial will be conducted. Website activity will be monitored and audited for security 
purposes. Users may view detailed tracking and management information for each participant and/or by 
assessment time point or follow-up visit. When study team members access the website, a list of upcoming 
participant assessments is presented for them to view so that participant management is easily accessible. 
Once logged in, research staff may run reports, enter data into forms, review and edit data, and access trial-
specific documents. As data are entered, validation rules are applied before data are saved. Inconsistencies 
are noted for staff to resolve. Research staff can resolve many queries immediately, comparing the screen to 
the source, often cleaning the entire database record on the spot. For queries not immediately resolvable, 
warnings are displayed whenever the data entry screen is recalled.   
 
All access to the website will be logged and stored for auditing purposes.  Restricted areas of the web site will 
be protected by user login.  Prior to gaining access to the restricted area, the user will be required to enter a 
username and password that will be checked against a database.  If the combination is correct, a "flag" will be 
set to allow the user to enter certain areas of the web site.  This system allows precise assignments for access 
based on the person’s role in the study.  Once a user has successfully logged into the system, inactivity for a 
period of 30 minutes will automatically force the user to re-authenticate prior to using the system again. 
 
A document describing each data element on the case report form and the location of its original source will be 
created, placed in the study regulatory binder, and posted on the study web site. CRFs will be used to obtain 
information from participants. Completed CRFs will be kept in the participant’s study binder at each site. From 
the CRFs, data will be directly entered into electronic case report forms.  The infrastructure will be a Windows 
server running Internet Information Server, with a middleware product (ColdFusion) to integrate database 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
17 
 
content within the website. Data will be stored in a secure SQL server relational database. With this web 
infrastructure, data entered into the system are immediately available for review and reporting.  All systems are 
backed up nightly to disk or tape and tapes are rotated off site several times a month.  
 
 
Protection – General 
 
Our security model for websites allows specification of access for each user to each area, allowing access to 
identifying information to be fully controlled. All research personnel are required to maintain current training in 
Protection of Human Subjects provided by WFSOM or the CITI web program.  All systems are securely 
controlled in the Division of Public Health Sciences data center, which has limited access through badge 
access (with direct reporting to the Security office). The data center has environmental controls to monitor 
power, temperature, humidity and sound levels and triggers for notifying staff and engineering, who are on-call 
24x7. Our core infrastructure consists of multiple servers, located in a secure network behind a firewall. 
Multiple intrusion detection systems monitor incoming and outgoing traffic patterns and signatures to identify 
and block potentially dangerous unauthorized attacks. Users are required to maintain secure passwords that 
expire every 90 days. Websites undergo a rigorous security scan by Wake Forest Baptist Health’s Information 
Security department to ensure that users cannot be redirected to a third party site and to ensure that 
participant information is secure.   
 
Protection - Disaster Recovery 
 
Each night, data, programs, code, documents, etc. associated with the study are backed up to a DLT tape 
library.  These tapes are kept indefinitely and are located in a fireproof cabinet that remains locked at all times.  
Periodically, copies of tapes are moved to an off-site location for storage.  In the event that there is any loss of 
data, the information can be restored from tape in a matter of hours.   The entire PHS computer facility is 
provided with conditioned power, UPS capability and environmental sensors with notification protocols. 
 
3.l. Potential Pitfalls and Alternative Solutions 
 
• 
Alternatives to generic SSRIs: we chose generic SSRIs because of our experience with them in prior trials, 
and their low cost. SSRIs have no inherent beneficial effect on sleep.9899-109 ‘Activation syndrome’ with 
SSRIs occurs in <5% of SSRI-treated outpatients110 and is not significantly associated with suicidal 
events.111 Instead, SSRIs are commonly associated with a reduction in suicidal ideas.57 
• 
Immediate starting of ZOL along with SSRI after a baseline week: In our prior research of depressed 
insomniacs, we designed a one-week wash-in of SSRI before starting insomnia therapy. No participants 
had resolution of their insomnia after one week of SSRI.  Thus, there seemed no benefit to including a 
delayed start of hypnotic therapy in the present proposed trial. 
• 
Recruitment of outpatients: We considered recruiting depressed inpatients into this trial, but concluded that 
the ethics of randomizing inpatients with suicidal ideation made their inclusion in the study unwise. 
• 
We recognize the limitation of an 8-week study, but believe it is important to first establish acute effects of 
insomnia treatment in reducing suicidal thinking before pursuing longer-term studies. 
 
Conclusions and Future Directions 
Results from this application will immediately inform clinical practice, by answering whether hypnotic treatment 
of insomnia reduces the intensity of suicidal ideation. If so, it opens the possibility that other forms of insomnia 
treatment (i.e., CBT-I) may also have benefit, or that specific treatment of nightmares may have benefit. This 
application will also provide support for hypothetical mechanisms explaining the association between insomnia 
and suicidal ideation. Finally, we will archive actigraphy data to allow future novel functional data analysis that 
may distinguish suicidal and non-suicidal depressed insomniacs.

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
18 
 
6. PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS 
 
6.a 
Subject selection procedures, and referral of excluded patients 
 
The screening procedures for subject selection are intended to:  (1) yield a sample with insomnia associated 
with depression, and (2) exclude patients who might be harmed by exposure to hypnotics, including pregnant 
women and patients with advanced sleep apnea and respiratory conditions. Three procedures will be used to 
qualify participants at the baseline assessment: body mass index (BMI), the Mini Mental State Exam 
(MMSE),65 and a two-channel screening test for sleep apnea. A BMI > 40 is highly correlated with obstructive 
sleep apnea (OSA).112  A MMSE score < 24 is statistically abnormal at any age and is consistent with global 
cognitive deficits such as seen in dementia.113  A history of chronic sleep disturbance before the index MDE will 
neither be an inclusion or exclusion criteria. It is expected that many eligible participants will have a prior 
history of primary insomnia, since this is a risk factor for the later development of MDE.114  
An apnea-hypopnea index >10 will be the threshold for screening positive for sleep apnea. Potential 
participants who are excluded because diagnosed sleep apnea will be referred to the Sleep Centers of the 
respective sites (under the leadership of the respective site principal investigators), while patients who are 
excluded because of absent suicidal ideation will be offered alternative care in the outpatient clinics of the 
respective sites. Persons excluded because of suicidal intent (SSI>15, and C-SSRS suicidal ideation level 4 or 
5 in the last week) will be evaluated for safety and perhaps the need for psychiatric hospitalization at the 
inpatient unit of the respective sites. All women of child bearing age will complete a urine pregnancy test at the 
first face to face visit. 
 
6.b.  
Recruitment and Consent Procedures  
 
 
6.b.1. Recruitment  Recruitment of depressed outpatients at each site will be facilitated by multiple methods, 
following upon the successful lessons learned in the pilot study. Recruitment methods will include: (1) internal 
communications to the clinicians within each department of psychiatry, (2) posters in pedestrian traffic areas in 
the hospitals, (3) presentations to the residents and faculty of primary care departments (internal medicine; 
family medicine) within each academic center, (4) presentations made to private practice providers in the 
respective communities, i.e., county psychiatric societies, and (5) newspaper ads. Historically, Dr. McCall’s 
group has had no problem recruiting at least 20% minorities into depression clinical trials.  
 
6.b.2.  Consent procedures  Initiation of the consent process begins when the Project Manager receives a 
phone call from the potential participant.  At that time, the Project Manager will describe the overall study 
design, and will detail the time commitment required from the participant. The potential participant will be 
invited for the face-to-face screening, and the project manager provides a copy of the consent form, allowing 
enough time for the participant to read the consent form and ask questions, and sign the consent form.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
19 
 
 
6.b.3.  Schedule of assessments 
Figure 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outpatient Weeks 1-8 
                                                                                                               
 
Antidepressant and Nightly hypnotic/placebo 
Outpatient Weeks 1-8 
 
Continued Visit Consent  
1 
Study Medication Accountability 
2 
Study Medication Dispensation-Randomized Treatment  
3 
Vitals 
4 
HRSD 
5 
Beck Suicide Severity Index/SSI 
6 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale-Since Last Visit 
7 
Insomnia Severity Index 
8 
Beck Hopelessness 
9 
Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep 
10 
Disturbing Dreams and Nightmare Severity Index 
11 
Sleep Diary 
12 
BASIS-32 
13 
SPAQ (Week 8 only) 
14 
rMEQ (Week 8 only)  
15 
Actigraphy 
16 
Concomitant Medications 
17 
CGI-I 
18 
CGI-S  
19 
AE 
20 
Encounter Disposition Form- Randomized Treatment  
                                              21 
Best Guess (End of study only)  
                                              22 
                                                                                                               
Telephone screening 
Screening 
1 
Baseline 
Baseline Follow-up 
Consent 
 
1 
 
Registration 
 
2 
 
Demographics 
 
                     3 
 
 
Vitals 
 
                     4 
 
BMI 
 
5 
 
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) 
 
6 
 
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) 
 
7 
 
Beck Hopelessness 
 
8 
 
Beck Suicide Severity Index/SSI 
 
9 
 
Research Diagnostic Criteria of Insomnia 
 
10 
 
Patient report of  latency, WASO and Sleep Efficiency Inclusion 
 
11 
 
MMSE 
 
12 
 
SCID 
 
13 
 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale-Baseline Screening  
 
14 
 
Epworth Sleepiness Scale 
 
15 
 
Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep 
 
16 
 
Disturbing Dreams and Nightmare Severity Index 
 
17 
 
BASIS-32 
 
18 
 
Medical History 
 
19 
 
Concomitant Medications 
 
20 
 
CGI-S  
 
21 
 
Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) 
 
                    22 
 
Hypnotic Treatment History Form (HTHF) 
 
                    23 
 
Urine Pregnancy Test/ Urine Drug Screening Test 
 
24 
 
Sleep Apnea Screening 
 
 
1 
Inclusion Exclusion Summary 
 
 
2 
Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) 
 
 
3 
Reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ) 
 
 
4 
Encounter Disposition Form- Baseline/Baseline Follow-up 
 
 
5 
Randomization 
 
 
6 
Study Medication Accountability  
 
 
7 
Study Medication Dispensation- Baseline  
 
 
8 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
20 
 
 
 
 
Follow Up 
                                                                                                               
Follow Up 
Insomnia Severity Index 
1 
Beck Suicide Severity Index/SSI 
2 
Encounter Disposition Form –Follow-up 
3 
 
6.c. 
Potential risks 
The risks of participating in this project are related to (1) the open-label antidepressants, (2) randomized 
allocation to ZOL, (3) randomized allocation to placebo. 
 
6.c.1. Risks of the open-label antidepressants 
The risks associated with SSRIs include jitteriness, nausea and other gastrointestinal upsets that are typically 
time limited, pose minimal danger, and do not merit discontinuation unless the patient is overwhelmed by the 
side effect. Sexual dysfunction and changes in weight are more problematic several weeks into initiation of 
SSRIs. Contrary to common belief, SSRIs are rarely associated with worsening suicidality, and when an 
increase in suicidality does occur, it is not necessarily related to so called ‘activation syndrome’.57;110;111 
SSRIs are  not associated with high risk of teratogenicity,115 but pregnancy tests will be obtained in women with 
the capacity to conceive. Pregnancy will be an exclusion criterion, and women will be instructed on birth control 
methods at the time of consent. 
 
6.c.2. Risks of zolpidem 
Some risks in previous placebo-controlled trials of hypnotics include daytime sedation, rebound insomnia upon 
discontinuation of the hypnotic, and memory impairment.116;117 117 Other risks that consistently appear in case-
controlled epidemiologic studies include increased risk of falls and motor vehicle accidents.118-120 118-120  Each 
post-randomization visit will include a standardized assessment of the presence or absence of drowsiness 
while driving or operating dangerous machinery, any accidents or injuries, and if any injuries or accidents 
occurred, then the time of day and relationship to the timing of the last ZOL dose. Patient adherence to waiting 
at least 8 hours after ZOL before driving or operating equipment will be confirmed. Patients that endorse 
drowsy driving, near-miss accidents, or injuries related to sleepiness will have their dosage of ZOL reduced 
from 12.5 to 6.25 mg. Patients that endorse drowsy driving, near-miss accidents, or injuries related to 
sleepiness and who are already taking only 6.25 mg will be dropped from the study. 
 
Finally, the possibility of tolerance, dependence, dose escalation, and abuse of hypnotics concern some 
physicians. However, community samples suggest that misuse/abuse rates for hypnotic medications are less 
than 1 in 300 patients.121 Studies implicating increased rate of falls in older persons taking benzodiazepines 
cannot separate the risk of insomnia risks from the risk of insomnia treatment. Studies of untreated insomniacs 
show that, as a group, they have more falls and poorer cognitive efficiency compared with good sleepers.122;123   
 
6.c.3. Risks of being allocated to placebo-hypnotic 
Although placebo has no known inherent risk, our research premise is that treatment of insomnia may reduce 
risk of suicidal ideation. Therefore, placebo may be associated with higher rates of suicidal ideation. 
 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
21 
 
 
 
 
6.d. 
Safeguards 
The Star*D trial was among the first NIH-sponsored trials to follow the 2001 NIH guidelines for studies which 
included patients at risk of suicide. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/suicide-prevention/issues-to-
consider-in-intervention-research-with-persons-at-high-risk-for-suicidality.shtml  124  The guidelines have 
several stipulations, and we have responded accordingly: 
1) “Provide specific inclusion criteria and their measurement with regards to suicidality” 
 
Response: Patients included in the study will have either: (1) a Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI) scores >3 
but <15, or (2) SSI >15 and SSI suicidal ideation level less than of 4 in the week before baseline 
assessment. This range defines patients with mild and moderate suicidal ideation without suicidal intent. 
Depressed patients in a university emergency department who are so suicidal that they require admission 
for safety can be accurately discriminated from depressed outpatients by a SSI scores=16, using receiver 
operating characteristic curves (AUC=0.94, p<0.0001).   
 
2)  “Specify the criteria for withdrawal from the treatment trial with regard to increased suicidality, increased 
related symptoms, lack of treatment response, and treatment side effects, and what alternative treatment 
or referral will be offered.” 
 
Response: The decision to withdraw the participant from blinded, randomized treatment will be based upon 
either the participant’s view or the research psychiatrist’s opinion that the patient is experiencing severe 
suffering, is at imminent risk for suicide, or is functionally decompensating.  The clinician’s opinion will be 
informed on the basis of the HRSD24 and the SSI, but the decision to withdraw a participant will be based 
upon a combination of psychometrics along with global clinical judgment.  If a participant is withdrawn from 
the study, then he or she will be offered care-as-usual, or hospitalization if necessary.  Participants will also 
be withdrawn from the study if they appear to have severe untoward reaction to bedtime study medication 
(i.e., repeated falls or ataxia). 
 
3) “Consider and establish criteria for hospitalization, where the hospitalization will take place, and the 
procedures within the hospital that provide additional safety” 
 
Response: Hospitalization will be offered if the patient is judged at imminent risk of suicide, is functionally 
decompensated, or needs specialized treatment outside of the protocol (such as ECT), according to the 
global clinical judgment of the study psychiatrist. Hospitalization would take place in the inpatient units of 
each clinical site. 
 
 
4) “Describe procedures in the protocol for managing increases in suicidality, and how research staff is 
trained and available to provide clinical management” 
 
Response: Managing increases in suicidality is predicated upon detection of such increases. Although we 
proposed to examine participants weekly for the first 2 weeks, we recognize that suicidal ideation may 
emerge suddenly and unpredictably. Therefore, research staff will make at least one mid-week phone call 
to each participant for the first 2 weeks, and weekly for the second two weeks, to check on their well-being 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
22 
 
and assure them that the study staff is available. At each scheduled study visit, the protocol will quantify 
suicidality 2 ways. First the participant will complete the Beck SSI; second, the research staff will 
administer the HRSD24. This information flows from the research staff to study psychiatrists at the time of 
the visit. Participants who have an increase in SSI score of > 6 point items will have a thorough review for 
the presence of any self-injurious behavior since the last visit or the development of any preparatory 
suicidal planning, as categorized by the C-SSRS.74   Six-points has been determined as the definition of  
emergent increase in suicidal ideation, as this value represents one standard deviation in SSI in depressed 
outpatients seen in Dr McCall’s outpatient clinic. Patients judged by the study psychiatrist to be at 
increased risk of suicide will have an increased frequency of research visits, have smaller supplies of 
research medication, or may be withdrawn from the study and possibly hospitalized. 
 
5) “Have a procedure for emergency coverage that is clearly understood by the clinical research staff, study 
participants, and families” 
 
Response: At the time of consent, participants will receive clear instructions for how to reach study staff 
during the daytime, and how to access after-hours coverage as provided through each site'. Psychiatry 
residents-in–training who receive emergency calls from participants after-hours will be instructed to call the 
local principal investigator immediately, regardless of the time of day. The PI or designated co-I will be 
continuously available to the respective on-call residents to guide crisis management and assess for the 
primary suicidal endpoints, if necessary by phone. 
 
6) “As part of the consent process, consider having explicit discussion with relevant family members, 
guardians, or friends that includes the risks inherent when study participants are suicidal (risk of death, side 
effects of treatment)” 
 
Response: Involvement of the participant’s family will be encouraged, starting by asking potential 
participants to bring their families to the first face-to-face screening visit.  
 
7) “Consider and identify the limits of confidentiality with respect to suicidality, as well as other circumstances” 
 
Response: When a participant has emergent suicidality defined as an increase of 6-points (one standard 
deviation of SSI scores in Dr McCall’s outpatients), we will inform the participant of our intent to share this 
with the relevant family, and the consent form will reflect this. 
 
8) “Consider the impact of suicidality on the study participant’s capacity to give informed consent” 
 
Response: Consent will be obtained only from persons who normally would not meet criteria for emergent 
psychiatric hospitalization, i.e., SSI scores will be <15.  
 
9) “Determine whether additional safeguards are needed to ensure the safety of the study participants” 
 
Response: A web page will be created to instruct participants on study progress and tell them how to 
contact the research team at any time. Patients or families without Internet access will receive paper copies 
of this information. 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
23 
 
 
10) “Consider situations in which a trial would be terminated prematurely” 
 
Response: The trial may be prematurely terminated by the DSMB as described in section E.8 .  
 
6.e. 
Confidentiality of subjects’ responses 
 
All participants are assured of confidentiality of the information obtained during their participation, with the 
exception of the expression of imminent suicidality. We will make every attempt to secure the participant’s 
permission to share a high risk of suicide with the participant’s family. All participants are assigned a subject 
number for the internal purposes of the research, and the patients’ identity on Case Report Forms is indicated 
only by their subject number and initials.  Case Report Forms are locked in the research offices of the principal 
investigators. Original source documents relevant to the delivery of clinical care are kept in the patient file 
office of the Departments of Psychiatry which is continuously staffed or locked, and these clinic files do not 
circulate beyond the Departments of Psychiatry. Participants will be advised that confidentiality could be 
breached in the event of an audit by the parent institution or the sponsor. 
All access to the website will be logged and stored for reporting uses.  Restricted areas of the web site will be 
protected by user login.  Prior to gaining access to the restricted area, the user will be required to enter a 
username and password that will be checked against a database.  If the combination is correct, a "flag" will be 
set to allow the user to enter certain areas of the web site.  This system gives us the ability to designate which 
areas and functionality the person can access.  Once a user has successfully logged into the system, any 
inactivity for 30 minutes will automatically force the user to re-authenticate (enter user name and password) 
before using the system again. 
 
 All research personnel will be required to maintain current training in Protection of Human Subjects provided 
by the respective sites or the CITI web program.  All systems are securely controlled in the Wake Forest 
University Division of Public Health Sciences data center, which has limited access through badge access 
(with direct reporting to the Security Office). The data center has environmental controls to monitor power, 
temperature, humidity and sound levels and triggers for notifying staff and engineering, which are on-call 24x7. 
Our core infrastructure consists of multiple servers, located in a secure network behind a firewall. Multiple 
intrusion detection systems monitor incoming and outgoing traffic patterns and signatures to identify and block 
potentially dangerous unauthorized attacks. Users of the data entry website at all recruiting sites are required 
to maintain secure passwords that expire every 90 days. Websites undergo a rigorous security scan by the 
institution’s IS department to ensure that users cannot be redirected to a third party site and to ensure that 
personal health information is secure.  
 
6.f. 
Research procedures   
Risks of teratogenicity will be limited by obtaining a pregnancy test from each women of childbearing potential 
before exposure to the first week of outpatient treatment and by counseling on the need for birth control. 
Pregnancy will be an exclusion criterion for study entry or for continued study participation. The research 
procedures include weekly assessment of suicidal ideation (the SSI) and side effects related to medication, 
including inquiry regarding gait or cognitive side effects (re: hypnotic), and sensory abnormalities (re: hypnotic). 
A study psychiatrist will examine each participant weekly during routine study visits and will clinically assess 
the risk of suicide. Participants judged to be at imminent risk of suicide will be managed as described above. 
Participants will only be given enough study medication to last until their next research visit. If unblinding is 
necessary, we will have a web-based facility that will allow unblinding of individual patients without unblinding 
the entire study.  A log will be kept of who accesses the unblinding table and which patients were unblinded. 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
24 
 
The principal investigators or designated co-Is will be available 24-hours per day by phone and beeper in the 
event of a participant’s medical emergency for the entire duration of the trial. Subjects will be provided with a 
business sized card to carry in their wallets. This card will include contact information for the physicians and 
staff members. In addition, it will include a 24-hour number to call in case of emergency. This number will put 
the subject in touch with the Resident-On-Call provided by the Departments of Psychiatry. The Resident will be 
able to put the subject in touch with the PI if needed.  
 
6.g. 
Limited access to hypnotics 
   
We will dispense no more than a week’s supply of ZOL/placebo at each visit in the first 2 weeks. A 2-week 
supply will be allowed in the following 6 weeks only if the participant’s most recent SSI did not increase 6 
points over baseline (i.e., one standard deviation of SSI scores in stable outpatients).  Pill counts will be 
conducted before dispensing additional hypnotic/placebo. A week’s supply of hypnotic, taken as a sole agent in 
an intentional overdose, is highly unlikely to be fatal.125   
 
6.h. 
Data and safety monitoring board (DSMB)   
The external data safety monitoring committee (DSMB) will be under the leadership of John Mann, MD, a 
suicidology expert at Columbia University. Also on the DSMB will be Maurizio Fava, MD, a depression 
psychopharmacology clinical trials expert from Harvard, John Winkelman, MD, a hypnotic and insomnia expert 
from Harvard, Ana Iltis, PhD, a bioethicist from the Graduate School campus of Wake Forest, Dusan Hadzi-
Pavlovic, PhD, a biostatistician from the University of New South Wales, and Mr. Andy Hagler, a patient 
advocate. Dr. Mann will receive quarterly, written reports of unblinded data regarding patient safety, 
recruitment statistics, any protocol violations, compliance, and completion rate.  Serious Adverse Events 
(SAEs) will be reported in real-time. The DSMB can determine if the trial should be terminated prematurely 
because of excessive SAEs in any arm of the trial. SAEs of primary concern will be death, hospitalizations, 
suicide attempts, and falls. In addition, the DSMB will convene a teleconference with the investigators no less 
than every 6 months, and an independent, formal report will be prepared by the DSMB to be forwarded to the 
investigators, the site IRBs, and the NIMH Program staff. 
Additionally, after 1/3 and 2/3 of the patients have completed the study, the study statistician (Dr. Case) will 
perform an interim analysis of the data, to determine whether early stopping of the study is necessary. The 
results of the analysis will be provided to the DSMB at their next teleconference, which should be convened no 
less than 2 months after the interim analysis is provided to the DSMB, and the DSMB will have final say over 
the implications of the interim results. The stopping rules are as follows:  
1) Accrue 46 patients and test H0 (no difference in SSI between the two arms). If the two-sided p-value < .0126 
then stop the study and reject H0; otherwise continue to accrue patients.   
2) Accrue 46 additional patients (92 total) and test H0.  If the two-sided p-value < .0228 then stop the study and 
reject H0; otherwise continue to accrue patients. 
3) Accrue 46 additional patients (138 total) and test H0.  If the two-sided p-value < .0308, then reject H0; 
otherwise fail to reject H0. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
25 
 
 
6.i. 
Risk/benefit ratio 
 
6.i.1.  Risks  
Emergent suicidal ideation or behavior is a risk of major depression. We have operationalize emergent suicidal 
ideation as a 6-point increase, as this represents on standard deviation of SSI scores seen in stable, 
depressed outpatients seen in the Wake Forest clinic. These risks will be discussed with the participant as part 
of the consent process. The risk of a fatal outcome from a suicide attempt is mitigated by limiting access to 
study medication. The likelihood of side effects related to ZOL increases if the patient ingests the medication 
and then fails to go to bed within 15 minutes, or if the ingestion occurs too late in the night to allow sufficient 
time before the morning rise time. Patients will be instructed appropriately to go to bed within 15 minutes of 
ingesting the hypnotic study drug, and to remain in bed (except for bathroom trips) for approximately 8 hours. 
Patients will be advised to guard against falls during nocturnal bathroom trips. If an adverse event (ataxia, falls, 
amnesia, dissociative reactions, hallucinations, residual sleepiness, delayed psychomotor reaction times) 
occurs despite participant adherence to recommended precautions, then participants will be advised to contact 
the principal investigator immediately to discuss possible ZOL dosage reduction or termination in the study. 
 
6.i.2. Benefits   
Benefits of participation include a detailed and accurate psychiatric assessment with the SCID and standard-
of-care antidepressant therapy at no cost to the patient. Treatment of depression and insomnia should bring 
lessened psychic distress, improved quality of life, improved psychosocial function, and perhaps lessen 
suicidal risk. The frequency and intensity of patient monitoring for depression symptoms and suicidal thinking is 
greater than that seen in routine care, and is an additional benefit. The overall benefit/risk ratio in this clinical 
trial is highly favorable, with a large potential impact upon public health policy in the management of 
depression with insomnia. 
 
6.j Gender and minority recruitment   
It is expected that women will constitute approximately 67% of the sample, since women represent both the 
majority of persons suffering with either depression or insomnia. The prior experience at all sites in recruiting 
depressed patients met this expectation.  Minorities, chiefly African-Americans, will comprise approximately 
15% of the total sample. More minorities will be recruited from GHSU and Duke (approximately 20-25% at 
these sites), consistent with the pilot study for this proposal. Wisconsin will have lower minority recruitment, 
reflecting its overall demographic composition. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
26 
 
 
 6.k Targeted/Planned Enrollment 
 
Table 3. 
Targeted/Planned Enrollment 
TARGETED/PLANNED ENROLLMENT: Number of Subjects 
Ethnic Category 
Sex/Gender 
Females 
Males 
Total 
Hispanic or Latino 
5 
2
7 
Not Hispanic or Latino 
87 
44
131 
Ethnic Category Total of All Subjects* 
92 
46
138 
Racial Categories 
 
American Indian/Alaska Native 
0 
0
0 
Asian 
0 
0
0 
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander  
0 
0
0 
Black or African American  
14 
7
21 
White 
78 
39
117 
Racial Categories: Total of All Subjects * 
92 
46
138 
 
6.l. 
Children and adolescents    
Children under 18 years old will be excluded since the safety of zolpidem has not been established in this 
group. 
 
7. Vertebrate Animals   
N/A 
 
 
 
 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
27 
 
 
Reference List 
 
 
1.  Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, et al. Suicide Prevention Strategies:  A Systematic Review. JAMA 2005;294: 2064-
2074 
 
2.  Maris R. Suicide. The Lancet 2002;360: 319-326 
 
3.  Coryell W, Young EA. Clinical predictors of suicide in primary major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 
2005;66: 412-417 
 
4.  Brown GK, Beck AT, Steer RA, et al. Risk factors for suicide in psychiatric outpatients:  a 20-year prospective 
study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000;68: 371-377 
 
5.  Hall R, Platt D, Hall R. Suicide Risk Assessment:  A Review of Risk Factors for Suicide in 100 Patients Who Made 
Severe Suicide Attempts. Psychosomatics 1999;40: 18-27 
 
6.  Oquendo M, Malone K, Mann JJ. Suicide:  Risk factors and prevention in refractory major depression. Depression 
and Anxiety 1997;5: 202-211 
 
7.  Oquendo M, Mann JJ. Intervention research for suicidal behavior. The Lancet 2003;362: 844-845 
 
8.  McCall W Vaughn. Insomnia is a risk factor for suicide - what are the next steps? Sleep 2011;34: 1149-1150 
 
9.  McCall WV, Blocker JN, D'Agostino Jr R, et al. Insomnia severity is an indicator of suicidal ideation during a 
depression clinical trial. Sleep Medicine 2010;11: 822-827 
 
10.  McCall WV, Black CG. The link between suicide and insomnia: theoretical mechanisms. Current Psychiatry Reports 
2013;15: 389 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
28 
 
 
11.  Barraclough B, Pallis DJ. Depression followed by suicide:  a comparison of depressed suicides with living 
depressives. Psychological Medicine 1975;5: 61 
 
12.  Agargun M, Kara H, Solmaz M. Subjective Sleep Quality and Suicidality in Patients with Major Depression. J 
Psychiat Res 1997;31: 377-381 
 
13.  Agargun MY, Kara H, Solmaz M. Sleep disturbances and suicidal behavior in patients with major depression. J 
Clin Psychiatry 1997;58: 249-251 
 
14.  Agargun M, Cilli A, Kara H, et al. Repetitive and Frightening Dreams and Suicidal Behavior in Patients with Major 
Depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry 1998;39: 198-202 
 
15.  Smith M, Perlis M, Haythornthwaite J. Suicidal Ideation in Outpatients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Clin J 
Pain 2004;20: 111-118 
 
16.  Bernert R, Joiner T, Cukrowicz K, et al. Suicidality and Sleep Disturbances. Sleep 2005;28: 1135-1141 
 
17.  Chellappa S, Araujo J. Sleep disorders and suicidal ideation in patients with depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res 
2007;153: 131-136 
 
18.  Bernert R, Reeve J, Perlis M, et al. Insomnia and nightmares as predictors of elevated suicide risk among patients 
seeking admission to emergency mental health facility. Sleep 2009;32: A365-A366 
 
19.  Agargun M, Besiroglu L, Cilli A, et al. Nightmares, suicide attempts, and melancholic features in patients with 
unipolar major depression. J Affect Disord 2007;98: 267-270 
 
20.  Sjostrom N, Waern M, Hetta J. Nightmares and Sleep Disturbances in Relation to Suicidality in Suicide 
Attempters. Sleep 2007;30: 91-95 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
29 
 
 
21.  Goodwin RD, Marusic A. Association between short sleep and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among 
adults in the general population. Sleep 2008;31: 1097-1101 
 
22.  Fawcett J, Scheftner WA, Fogg L, et al. Time-related predictors of suicide in major affective disorder. Am J 
Psychiatry 1990;147: 1189-1194 
 
23.  Tanskanen A, Tuomilehto J, Vinamaki H, et al. Nightmares as Predictors of Suicide. Sleep 2001;24: 844-847 
 
24.  Fujino Y, Mizoue T, Tokui N, et al. Prospective Cohort Study of Stress, Life Satisfaction, Self-Rated Health, 
Insomnia, and Suicide Death in Japan. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2005;35: 227-237 
 
25.  Turvey CL, Conwell Y, Jones MP, et al. Risk factors for late-life suicide: a prospective, community-based study. 
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;10: 398-406 
 
26.  Li SX, Lam SP, Yu MW, et al. Nocturnal sleep disturbance as a predictor of suicide attempts among psychiatric 
outpatients: a clinical, epidemiologic, prospective study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2010;71: 1140-1146 
 
27.  Tishler CL, McKenry PC, Morgan K. Adolescent Suicide Attempts:  Some Significant Factors. Suicide Life Threat 
Behav 1981;11: 86-92 
 
28.  Bailly D, Bailly-Lambin I, Querleu D, et al. Le sommeil des adolescents et ses troubles Une enquete en mileiu 
scolaire. L'Encephale 2004;30: 352-359 
 
29.  Choquet M, Menke H. Suicidal Thoughts During Early Adolescence:  Prevalence, Associated Troubles and Help-
Seeking Behavior. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989;81: 170-177 
 
30.  Choquet M, Kovess V. Suicidal Thoughts Among Adolescents:  An Intercultural Approach. Adolescence 1993;28: 
649-661 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
30 
 
 
31.  Liu X. Sleep and Adolescent Suicidal Behavior. Sleep 2004;27: 1351-1358 
 
32.  Vignau J, Bailly D, Duhamel A, et al. Epidemiologic Study of Sleep Quality and Troubles in French Secondary 
School Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health 1997;21: 343-350 
 
33.  Roberts R, Roberts C, Chen I. Functioning of Adolescents with Symptoms of Disturbed Sleep. Journal of Youth 
and Adolescence 2001;30: 1-18 
 
34.  Cukrowicz K, Otamendi A, Pinto JV, et al. The Impact of Insomnia and Sleep Disturbances on Depression and 
Suicidality. Dreaming 2006;16: 1-10 
 
35.  Barbe RP, Williamson D, Bridge JA, et al. Clinical Differences Between Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Depressed 
Children and Adolescents. Journal Clinical Psychiatry 2005;66: 492-498 
 
36.  Goldstein TR, Bridge JA. Sleep Disturbance Preceding Completed Suicide in Adolescents. Journal of Consulting 
and Clinical Psychology 2008;76: 84-91 
 
37.  Nadorff MR, Nazem S, Fiske A. Insomnia symptoms, nightmares, and suicidal ideation in a college student 
sample. Sleep 2011;34: 93-98 
 
38.  Bjerkeset O, Romundstad P, Gunnell D. Sleeping problems and suicide in 75,000 Norwegian adults: a 20 year 
follow-up of the HUNT I study. Sleep 2011;34: 1155-1159 
 
39.  Brower K, McCammon R, Wojnar M, et al. Prescription sleeping pills, insomnia, and suicidality in the National 
Comorbidity Survey Replication. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2011;72: 515-521 
 
40.  Krakow B, Ribeiro J, Ulibarri V, et al. Sleep disturbance and suicidal ideation in sleep medical center patients. 
Journal of Affective Disorder 2011;131: 422-427 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
31 
 
 
41.  Carli V, Roy A, Bevilacqua L, et al. Insomnia and suicidal behavior in prisoners. Psychiatry Res 2011;185: 141-144 
 
42.  Fitzgerald CT, Messias E, Buysse Daniel J. Teen sleep and suicidality: results from the youth risk behavior surveys 
of 2007 and 2009. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 2011;7: 351-356 
 
43.  Agargun MY, Cartwright R. REM Sleep, Dream Variables and Suicidality in Depressed Patients. Psychiatry Res 
2003;119: 33-39 
 
44.  Kellner C, Fink M, Knapp R, et al. Relief of Expressed Suicidal Intent by ECT:  A Consortium for Research in ECT 
Study. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162: 977-982 
 
45.  Cipriani A, Pretty H, Hawton K, et al. Lithium in the Prevention of Suicidal Behavior and All-Cause Mortality in 
Patients with Mood Disorders:  A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162: 1805-1819 
 
46.  Coffey CE, McCall V, Hoelscher TJ. Effects of ECT on polysomnographic sleep:  A pilot prospective study. 
Convulsive Therapy 1988;4: 269-279 
 
47.  Billiard M. Lithium Carbonate:  Effects on Sleep Patterns of Normal and Depressed Subjects and Its Use in Sleep-
Wake Pathology. Pharmacopsychiatry 1987;20: 195-196 
 
48.  Espie C, Inglis S, Harvey L, et al. Insomniacs' Attributions:  Psychometric Properties of the Dysfunctional Beliefs 
and Attitudes about Sleep Scale and the Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 
2000;48: 141-148 
 
49.  Morin C, Stone J, Trinkle D, et al. Dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep among older adults with and 
without insomnia complaints. Psychol Aging 1993;8: 463-467 
 
50.  Carney CE, Edinger Jack D. Identifying critical beliefs about sleep in primary insomnia. Sleep 2006;29: 444-453 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
32 
 
 
51.  Carney C, Edinger J, Manber R, et al. Beliefs About Sleep in Disorders Characterized by Sleep and Mood 
Disturbance. Journal of Psychosom Res 2007;62: 179-188 
 
52.  McCall WV, Fleischer AB, Jr., Feldman SR. Diagnostic codes associated with hypnotic medications during 
outpatient physician-patient encounters in the United States from 1990-1998. Sleep 2002;25: 221-223 
 
53.  Nierenberg AA, Keefe BR, Leslie VC, et al. Residual symptoms in depressed patients who respond acutely to 
fluoxetine. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60: 221-225 
 
54.  Beasley CJr, Nilsson M, Koke S, et al. Efficacy, adverse events, and treatment discontinuations in fluoxetine 
clinical studies of major depression:  a meta-analysis of the 20-mg/day dose. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 
2000;61: 722-728 
 
55.  Cook M, Conner J. Retrospective review of hypnotic use in combination with fluoxetine and sertraline. Clin Drug 
Invest 1995;9: 212-216 
 
56.  Perlis R, Purcell S, Fava M, et al. Association Between Treatment-Emergent Suicidal Ideation with Citalopram and 
Polymorphisms Near Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element Binding Protein in the STAR*D Study. 
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64: 689-697 
 
57.  Leon AC, Keller MB, Warshaw MG, et al. Prospective study of fluoxetine treatment and suicidal behavior in 
affectively ill subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry 1999;156: 195-201 
 
58.  Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23: 56-62 
 
59.  Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for 
insomnia research. Sleep Medicine 2001;2: 297-307 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
33 
 
 
60.  Beck AT, Kovacs M, Weissman A. Assessment of suicidal intention: the Scale for Suicide Ideation. J Consult Clin 
Psychol 1979;47: 343-352 
 
61.  Beck AT, Brown GK, Steer RA. Psychometric characteristics of the Scale for Suicide Ideation with psychiatric 
outpatients. Behav Res Ther 1997;35: 1039-1046 
 
62.  Beck AT, Brown GK, Steer RA, et al. Suicide ideation at its worst point: a predictor of eventual suicide in 
psychiatric outpatients. Suicide Life Threat Behav 1999;29: 1-9 
 
63.  Edinger JD, Bonnet MH, Bootzin RR, et al. Derivation of research diagnostic criteria for insomnia:  Report of an 
American Academy of Sleep Medicine work group. Sleep 2004;27: 1567-1596 
 
64.  American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth ed. Washington, 
DC: 1994 
 
65.  Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of 
patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12: 189-198 
 
66.  McCall WV, Kimball J, Boggs N, et al. Prevalence and prediction of primary sleep disorders in a clinical trial of 
depressed patients with insomnia. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 2009;5: 454-458 
 
67.  Sherick P, Symanzik J, Shannon W. Accuracy, bias, and notable observations for experimental actigraphy data. In: 
American Statistical Association, ed. Alexandria, Virginia: 2010: 
 
68.  Motohashi Y. Circadian variation in suicide attempts in Tokyo from 1978 to 1985. Suicide Life Threat Behav 
1990;20: 352-361 
 
69.  Morin CM, Blais F, Savard J. Are changes in beliefs and attitudes about sleep related to sleep improvements in 
the treatment of insomnia? Behav Res Ther 2002;40: 741-752 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
34 
 
 
70.  Beck A, Brown G, Berchick R, et al. Relationship between hopelessness and ultimate suicide:  A replication with 
psychiatric outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry 1990;147: 190-195 
 
71.  Beck A, Steer R. Beck Hopeless Scale Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1988 
 
72.  Fava M, McCall V, Krystal A, et al. Eszopiclone Co-Administered With Fluoxetine in Patients With Insomnia 
Coexisting With Major Depressive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2006;59: 1052-1060 
 
73.  Krystal A, Fava M, Rubens R, et al. Evaluation of Eszopiclone Discontinuation After Cotherapy with Fluoxetine for 
Insomnia with Coexisting Depression. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 2007;3: 48-55 
 
74.  Oquendo MA, Halberstam B, Mann JJ. Risk factors for suicidal behavior: utility and limitations of research 
instruments. In: First MB, ed. Standardized Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Washington, DC: APPI Press; 2003:103-
130 
 
75.  Krystal AD, Walsh JK, Laska E, et al. Sustained efficacy of eszopiclone over 6 months of nightly treatment: results 
of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with chronic insomnia. Sleep 2003;26: 793-
799 
 
76.  McCall WV, Blocker JN, D'Agostino RB, Jr., et al. Treatment of insomnia in depressed insomniacs: effects on 
health-related quality of life, objective and self-reported sleep, and depression. Journal of Clinical Sleep 
Medicine 2010;6: 322-329 
 
77.  Perlis RH. Hard outcomes: clinical trials to reduce suicide. American Journal of Psychiatry 2011;168: 1009-1011 
 
78.  Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991;14: 540-
545 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
35 
 
 
79.  Posner K, Oquendo M, Gould M, et al. Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): 
classification of suicidal events in the FDA's pediatric suicidal risk analysis of antidepressants. American Journal 
of Psychiatry 2007;164: 1035-1043 
 
80.  Brown GK, Have TT, Henriques GR, et al. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: a randomized 
controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294: 563-570 
 
81.  Grunebaum MF, Ellis S, Duan N, et al. Pilot randomized clincial trial of an SSRI vs bupropion: effects on suicidal 
behavior, ideation, and mood in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012;37: 697-706 
 
82.  McCall W, Kimball  J, Boggs N, et al. Correlations between polysomnography and actigraphy in detecting change 
in macro sleep variables during treatment of persons with both depression and insomnia. 31 ed 2008:A335-A336 
 
83.  Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric Properties of the Beck Depression Inventory:  Twenty-Five Years of 
Evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 1988;8: 77-100 
 
84.  Morin CM, Gramling SE. Sleep patterns and aging: comparison of older adults with and without insomnia 
complaints. Psychol Aging 1989;4: 290-294 
 
85.  Steer R, Beck A. Use of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hopelessness Scale, Scale for Suicidal Ideation, and 
Suicidal Intent Scale with Adolescents. Advances in Adolescent Mental Health 1988;3: 219-231 
 
86.  Goldston D, Daniel S, Reboussin B, et al. Cognitive Risk Factors and Suicide Attempts Among Formerly 
Hospitalized Adolescents:  A Prospective Naturalistic Study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and 
Adolescent Psychiatry 2001;40: 91-99 
 
87.  Scott J, House R, Yates M, et al. Individual Risk Factors for Early Repetition of Deliberate Self-Harm. British 
Journal of Medical Psychology 1997;70: 387-393 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
36 
 
 
88.  Krakow B, Schrader R, Tandberg D, et al. Nightmare Frequency in Sexual Assault Survivors with PTSD. J Anxiety 
Disord 2002;16: 175-190 
 
89.  Eisen SV, Dill DL, Grob MC. Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome 
evaluation. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1994;45: 242-247 
 
90.  Eisen SV. Assessment of subjective distress by patients' self-report versus structured interview. Psychol Rep 
1995;76: 35-39 
 
91.  Vittinghoff E, Sen S, McCullough. Sample size calculations for evaluating mediation. Statistics in Medicine 
2009;28: 541-557 
 
92.  Baron R, Kenny D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, 
strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986;51: 1173-1182 
 
93.  MacKinnon DP, Lookwood CM, Hoffman JM, et al. A comparison of methods to test the significance of mediation 
and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 2002;7: 83-104 
 
94.  Krause M, Serline R, Ward S, et al. Testing medication in nursing research: beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical 
medication analysis in the new millenium. Nursing Research 2010;59: 288-294 
 
95.  MacKinnon D, Lockwood C. Confidence intervals for the indirect effect: distribution of product and resampling 
methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2004;39: 99-128 
 
96.  Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jacknife. The Annals of Statistics 1979;7: 1-26 
 
97.  Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillside, NJ: 
Erlbaum; 1983 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
37 
 
 
98.  Gillin JC, Rapaport M, Erman MK, et al. A comparison of nefazodone and fluoxetine on mood and on objective, 
subjective, and clinician-rated measures of sleep in depressed patients: a double-blind, 8-week clinical trial. J 
Clin Psychiatry 1997;58: 185-192 
 
99.  Jindal RD, Friedman ES, Berman SR, et al. Effects of sertraline on sleep architecture in patients with depression. J 
Clin Psychopharmacol 2003;23: 540-548 
 100.  Oswald I, Adam K. Effects of paroxetine on human sleep. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1986;22: 97-99 
 101.  Nowell PD, Reynolds CF, III, Buysse DJ, et al. Paroxetine in the treatment of primary insomnia: preliminary 
clinical and electroencephalogram sleep data. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60: 89-95 
 102.  Ridout F, Meadows R, Johnsen S, et al. A placebo controlled investigation into the effects of paroxetine and 
mirtazapine on measures related to car driving performance. Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and 
Experimental 2003;18: 261-269 
 103.  van Bemmel AL, van den Hoofdakker RH, Beersma DG, et al. Changes in sleep polygraphic variables and clinical 
state in depressed patients during treatment with citalopram. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1993;113: 225-230 
 104.  Salin-Pascual RJ, Galicia-Polo L, Drucker-Colin R. Sleep changes after 4 consecutive days of venlafaxine 
administration in normal volunteers. J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58: 348-350 
 105.  Shelton RC, Prakash A, Mallinckrodt C, et al. Patterns of depressive symptom response in duloxetine-treated 
outpatients with mild, moderate or more severe depression. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2007;61: 
1337-1348 
 106.  Kluge M, Schussler P, Steiger A. Duloxetine increases stage 3 sleep and suppresses rapid eye movement (REM) 
sleep in patients with major depression. European Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 527-531 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
38 
 
 107.  Chalon S, Pereira A, Lainey E, et al. Comparative effects of duloxetine and desipramine on sleep EEG in healthy 
subjects. Psychopharmacology 2005; 357-365 
 108.  Brecht S, Kajdasz D, Ball S, et al. Clinical impact of duloxetine treatment on sleep in patients with major 
depressive disorder. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 2008;23: 317-324 
 109.  Ott GE, Rao U, Lin KM, et al. Effect of treatment with bupropion on EEG sleep: relationship to antidepressant 
response. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 275-281 
 110.  Harada T, Sakamoto K, Ishigooka J. Incidence and predictors of activation syndrome induced by antidepressants. 
Depression and Anxiety 2008;25: 1014-1019 
 111.  Tollefson GD, Rampey AH, Jr., Beasley CM, Jr., et al. Absence of a relationship between adverse events and 
suicidality during pharmacotherapy for depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994;14: 163-169 
 112.  Crocker BD, Olson LG, Saunders NA, et al. Estimation of the probability of disturbed breathing during sleep 
before a sleep study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;142: 14-18 
 113.  Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, et al. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age 
and educational level. JAMA 1993;269: 2386-2391 
 114.  Ford DE, Kamerow DB. Epidemiologic study of sleep disturbances and psychiatric disorders. An opportunity for 
prevention? JAMA 1989;262: 1479-1484 
 115.  Pastuszak A, Schick-Boschetto B, Zuber C, et al. Pregnancy outcome following first-trimester exposure to 
fluoxetine (Prozac). JAMA 1993;269: 2246-2248 
 116.  Dealberto MJ, Mcavay GJ, Seeman T, et al. Psychotropic drug use and cognitive decline among older men and 
women. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997;12: 567-574 

 
Version Date: March 8, 2014 
 
 
39 
 
 117.  Tonne U, Hiltunen AJ, Vikander B, et al. Neuropsychological changes during steady-state drug use, withdrawal 
and abstinence in primary benzodiazepine-dependent patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995;91: 299-304 
 118.  Ray WA, Griffin MR, Downey W. Benzodiazepines of long and short elimination half-life and the risk of hip 
fracture. JAMA 1989;262: 3303-3307 
 119.  Leveille SG, Buchner DM, Koepsell TD, et al. Psychoactive medications and injurious motor vehicle collisions 
involving older drivers. Epidemiology 1994;5: 591-598 
 120.  Hemmelgarn B, Suissa S, Huang A, et al. Benzodiazepine use and the risk of motor vehicle crash in the elderly. 
JAMA 1997;278: 27-31 
 121.  Boethius G, Westerholm B. Is the use of hypnotics, sedatives and minor tranquilizers really a major health 
problem? Acta Med Scand 1976;199: 507-512 
 122.  Balter MB, Uhlenhuth EH. New epidemiologic findings about insomnia and its treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 
1992;53 Suppl: 34-39 
 123.  Vignola ALC, Bastien C, Morin CM. Effects of chronic insomnia and use of benzodiazepines on daytime 
performance in older adults. Journal of Gerontology 2000;55B: 54-62 
 124.  Nierenberg AA, Trivedi MH, Ritz L, et al. Suicide risk management for the sequenced treatment alternatives to 
relieve depression study: applied NIMH guidelines. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2004;38: 583-589 
 125.  Garnier R, Guerault E, Muzard D, et al. Acute zolpidem poisoning--analysis of 344 cases. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 
1994;32: 391-404