Outcomes of Metabolic Resuscitation Using Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, and Glucocorticoids in the Early Treatment of Sepsis.
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Sepsis, Severe, Septic Shock
Sponsor: Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ

 
 
Page 1 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
Outcomes of Metabolic Resuscitation Using Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, 
and Glucocorticoids in the Early Treatment of Sepsis. 
ORANGES Trial 
NCT#: NCT03422159 
Background and Significance:  
The global burden of sepsis is substantial with an estimated 15 to 19 million cases per year; the vast 
majority of these cases occur in low income countries. [1] With more timely diagnosis and improvement 
in supportive care the 28-day mortality from sepsis in high income countries has declined to about 25%, 
however, the mortality from septic shock remains as high as 45%. [2,3] Moreover, the mortality from 
sepsis and septic shock in low income countries is reported to be as high as 60%.[4-6] In addition to 
short term mortality, septic patients suffer from a numerous short- and long-term complications and are 
at an increased risk of death for up to five years following the acute event.[7] Over the last 3 decades 
over 100 phase II and phase III clinical trial have been performed testing various novel pharmacologic 
agents and therapeutic intervention in an attempt to improve the outcome of patients with sepsis and 
septic shock; all of these studies have failed to show an improvement in patient outcomes. [8] New 
therapeutic approaches to sepsis are desperately required; considering the global burden of sepsis these 
interventions should be effective, cheap, safe and readily available.  
A large body of experimental data has demonstrated that both corticosteroids and intravenous vitamin 
C reduce activation of nuclear factor ƘB (NFƘB) attenuating the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, 
reduce the endothelial injury characteristic of sepsis thereby reducing endothelial permeability and 
improving macrocirculatory flow, augment the release of endogenous catecholamines and enhance 
vasopressor responsiveness.[9-16] In animal models these effects have resulted in reduced organ injury 
and increased survival. Corticosteroids have been evaluated in several clinical trials, with meta-analysis 
of these trials demonstrating somewhat conflicting outcomes. [17-20] Low-dose stress corticosteroids 
have proven to be safe with no increased risk of clinically important complications. [17] While 
corticosteroids decrease vasopressor dependency the effect on survival is less clear.[19,21]  
Several studies have investigated the use of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients. Nathens et al 
randomized 595 surgical ICU patients (91% trauma patients) to receive intravenous vitamin C and 
vitamin E for up to 28 days. [22] The vitamin combination was associated with a significant reduction in 
the incidence of multiple system organ failure (p=0.04) with a trend to reduced mortality and length of 
ICU stay. No adverse effects were noted with the vitamin combination. Fowler et al performed a pilot 

 
 
Page 2 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
study in 24 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. [23] In this study patients were randomized to 
placebo (n=8), low dose intravenous vitamin C (50 mg/kg) (n=8) or high dose vitamin C (200mg/kg). 
Vitamin C attenuated the inflammatory response with both doses of the vitamin being devoid of any 
side effects. Although the Sequential Sepsis Related Organ Failure Score (SOFA) fell significantly in both 
treatment arms the study was underpowered to determine any outcome benefit. Zabet and colleagues 
performed a RCT in which they evaluated the role of intravenous vitamin C in a dose of 100 mg/kg/day 
(about 7g/day) in 28 surgical ICU patients with septic shock. [24] In this study the mean dose of 
norepinephrine and duration of norepinephrine administration were significantly lower in the ascorbic 
acid than the placebo group. The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the ascorbic acid than the 
placebo group (14% vs. 64%, p = 0.009). No side effects related to the vitamin C infusion were reported. 
Tanaka et al randomized 37 patients with severe burn to very high dose vitamin C (about 110g/day) or 
placebo.[25] Patients who received vitamin C required less fluid resuscitation with a trend towards 
reduced length of stay and mortality. No adverse effects were noted with the very high dosages of 
vitamin C. Several studies have administered vitamin C in doses exceeding 100g/day as adjuvant therapy 
in patients with cancer with no discernable side effects. [26-33] Vitamin C appears to be toxic to normal 
human cells (not cancer cells) at a concentration on greater than 25 mM. [33] A dose of 6g/day will 
achieve a steady state serum concentration of about 240uM [34-36] which is about 100 times less than 
the dose required to cause cellular toxicity. The package insert for vitamin C [37] lists no 
contraindications or adverse effects of the drug and states that as much as “6 grams has been 
administered without evidence of toxicity”. The only reported restriction to the use of high dose 
intravenous vitamin C is in patients with known glucose-6-phospahte deficiency (G6PD) in whom 
hemolysis has been reported. [38,39] It is important to recognize that patents with sepsis predictably 
have very low serum vitamin C levels, which can only be corrected with intravenous vitamin C in a dose 
of more than 3gm per day. [23,34,36] The low or undetectable levels of vitamin C likely result from the 
metabolic consumption of the molecule as well as increased renal losses. Furthermore, unlike all other 
mammals, primates and guinea pigs are unable synthesize vitamin C is due to mutations in the L-gulono-
_-lactone oxidase (GLO) gene which codes for the enzyme responsible for catalyzing the last step of 
vitamin C biosynthesis. [40] In almost all species, except humans and guinea pigs, vitamin C production 
increases during stress and is secreted by the adrenal gland; in these species vitamin C is best 
considered a stress “hormone”. [40] Vitamin C is an essential cofactor for the production of 
corticosteroids and catecholamines by the adrenal gland. [13,41] Vitamin C has been shown to reverse 
adrenal suppression caused by induction doses of etomidate during anesthesia.[42,43]  
Ascorbate donates a single electron in all its redox reactions, generating the ascorbate radical. This 
radical is not very reactive with anything but itself. Dismutation of two ascorbate radicals forms a 
molecule each of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate. Hydrolysis of the lactone ring of dehydroascorbate 

 
 
Page 3 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
irreversibly converts it to 2,3-diketo-1-gulonic acid which is then converted to oxalate. Oxalate is 
normally excreted by the kidney and serum levels will increase with renal impairment. In patients with 
renal impairment receiving mega-dose vitamin C, supersaturation of serum with oxalate may result in 
tissue deposition as well as crystallization in the kidney. [44,45] Glyoxylate, a byproduct of intermediary 
metabolism, is either reduced to oxalate or oxidized to CO2 by the enzyme glyoxylate aminotransferase; 
thiamine pyrophosphate is a co-enzyme required for this reaction. [46] Thiamine deficiency increases 
the conversion of glyoxylate to oxalate resulting in hyper- oxalosis. [47,48] Donnino and colleagues have 
demonstrated that thiamine deficiency is common (32%) in patients with sepsis and that treatment with 
thiamine in these patients reduces mortality. [49] In a post-hoc analysis of this study these authors 
demonstrated that thiamine decreased the risk of acute kidney injury and the required for renal 
replacement therapy in all treated patients. [50]  
It has previously been suggested that “...the best hope for therapeutic advances [in sepsis] will depend 
on broad-base targeting, in which multiple components are targeted at the same time.”[51] Such 
combination “chemo-therapy” targeting multiple biological pathways is the standard approach in the 
treatment of malignant disease. While the benefits of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine alone are 
likely limited,[23,49,50,52] we believe that these medications act synergistically to reduce the risk of 
organ failure and death in patients with sepsis. This hypothesis is supported previous research [53,54] 
and more recently a set of elegant experiments performed by Barabutis et al. [55] Using a validated 
pulmonary endothelial monolayer model, these authors demonstrated that hydrocortisone together 
with vitamin C protected the vascular endothelium from damage by endotoxin while neither agent alone 
had this effect. Previous research has demonstrated that vitamin C reverses oxidation of the 
glucocorticoid receptor (GR) a likely manifestation of sepsis.[53] Oxidation of the GR limits binding of the 
GR to both ligand and DNA responsive units decreasing the activity of glucocorticoids. [53] Furthermore, 
glucocorticoids increase the expression of the sodium vitamin C transporter-2 (SVCT-2) which is an 
essential transport protein necessary for vitamin C to be transported intracellularly.[54]  
We therefore propose that a “metabolic resuscitation protocol” including vitamin C, corticosteroids and 
thiamine will limit the development of organ failure and reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis 
and septic shock. This postulate is supported by the preliminary findings by Marik et al. [56] In a 
retrospective before-after clinical study, these authors compared the outcome and clinical course of 
consecutive septic patients treated with intravenous vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine during a 7-
month period (treatment group) compared to a control group treated in during the preceding 7 
months.[56] The primary outcome was hospital survival. A propensity score was generated to adjust the 
primary outcome. There were 47 patients in both treatment and control groups with no significant 
differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The hospital mortality was 8.5% (4 of 47) 

 
 
Page 4 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
in the treatment group compared to 40.4% (19 of 47) in the control group (p < 0.001). The propensity 
adjusted odds of mortality in the patients treated with the vitamin C protocol was 0.13 (95% CI 0.04-
0.48, p=0.002). The SOFA score decreased in all patients in the treatment group with none developing 
progressive organ failure. Vasopressors were weaned off all patients in the treatment group, a mean of 
18.3 ± 9.8 hours after starting treatment with vitamin C protocol. The mean duration of vasopressor use 
was 54.9 ± 28.4 hours in the control group (p<0.001). The results of this study provide sufficient 
information for the design of an adequately powered, pragmatic randomized controlled trial.  
Study Design: 
Specific Aims of the Study:  
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the combination of intravenous vitamin C, 
hydrocortisone and thiamine on the clinical course and outcome of patients with sepsis and septic 
shock.  
This study will be performed at Community Medical Center and Monmouth Medical Center Southern 
Campus. All patients admitted to the ICU with the primary diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock will be 
screened for inclusion into this study. The diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock will be based on the 2016 
Surviving Sepsis Campaign definitions.[63]  
Inclusion Criteria: 
i. Diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock within 12 hours of admission to the ICU  
ii. Informed consent as dictated by IRB and local practice.  
iii. Compliance with the 3 hour sepsis bundle  
 
30ml/kg of intravenous crystalloid fluid (e.g.: sodium chloride 0.9%) for lactic acid >4 
and/or systolic blood pressure <90mmHg / mean arterial pressure <65mmHg 
 
Lactic acid level drawn 
 
Broad spectrum antibiotics given after obtaining blood cultures 
Exclusion criteria:  
i. Age < 18 years  
ii. Pregnant  

 
 
Page 5 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
iii. DNR/DNI with limitations of care on admission 
iv. Patients with terminal end stage disease (i.e. stage IV cancer, end stage heart failure) that are unlikely 
to survive to hospital discharge  
v. Patients with a primary admitting diagnosis of an acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary 
syndrome, active gastrointestinal bleeding, burn or trauma [64-66]  
vi. Requirement for immediate surgery [64-66]  
vii. Patients with HIV and a CD4 < 50 mm2 [64-66]  
viii. Patients with known glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6PD) deficiency.[39]  
ix. Patients with sepsis/septic shock transferred from another hospital  
x. Patients with features of sepsis/septic shock > 24 hours after admission 
Study end-points:  
Primary end-point  
i. Time to vasopressor independence. Defined as the time from starting the active treatment/placebo to 
discontinuation of all pressors 
ii. Delta SOFA score, defined as the initial SOFA score minus the day 4 SOFA score 
Secondary end-points  
iii. 28-day mortality  
iv. Hospital mortality 
v. PCT clearance (PCT-c) calculated using the following formula: initial PCT minus PCT at 96 hours, 
divided by the initial PCT multiplied by 100. [67,68]  
vi. ICU mortality 
vii. ICU length of stay (LOS) and ICU free days. ICU free days is calculated as the number of days alive and 
out of the ICU to day 28 
viii. Hospital LOS 

 
 
Page 6 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone and Thiamine dosing protocol and randomization  
Medication dosing.  
Based on published clinical data, vitamin C pharmacokinetic modeling, the package insert as well as the 
preliminary study by Marik et al, Vitamin C will be administered as an intravenous dose of 6gm per day 
divided in 4 equal doses. [22-24,34-37] This dosage is reported to be devoid of any complications or side 
effects. Hydrocortisone will be dosed according to the consensus guidelines of the American College of 
Critical Care Medicine.[52] Thiamine will be administered according to current recommendations in a 
dose of 200mg q 12 hourly. [69]  
This is a double-blind placebo controlled study. Only the dispensing pharmacist will be aware of the 
treatment allocation. Patients will be randomized to receive either vitamin C/hydrocortisone/thiamine 
or triple placebo using a random number table provided to the dispensing pharmacists. Each patient will 
be allocated a unique subject ID which will be linked to the randomization sequence. Only the 
dispensing pharmacists will have a record of the subject ID and randomization sequence. The vitamin C, 
vitamin C-placebo, hydrocortisone, hydrocortisone-placebo, thiamine, and thiamine-placebo will be 
formulated as follows:  
Vitamin C:  Vitamin C is provided by the manufacturer as a 50 ml vial at a concentration of 500mg/ml. 
Three (3) ml of vitamin C will be placed in a 50 ml bag of Normal Saline (1500 mg vitamin C in 50ml bag)  
which will then be infused over 30 minutes (100mL/hr). The bag will be labeled by the pharmacy as 
“Vitamin C 1.5g or Placebo”. The dosing schedule is 1500mg every 6 hours for 4 days (or discontinued 
earlier if discharged from the ICU).  
Once the vial is open, it is only stable for 6 hours. The resulting product is given 12 hour stability. When 
first ordered, 2 doses are made then and sent to the nurse. For next 12 hours, they will wait until 1 hour 
prior to make the next batch.  
Vitamin C placebo will consist of an identical bag of 50mL normal saline (but with no vitamin C) and will 
be labeled “Vitamin C or Placebo”. Placebo will be infused over 30 minutes as per the infusion 
instructions of the active vitamin. 
Hydrocortisone:  Patients will be treated with hydrocortisone 50mg IV push every 6 hours for 4 days (or 
discontinued earlier if discharged from the ICU). Pharmacists will prepare hydrocortisone 50mg/1mL for 
the nurse in a 3mL syringe which will be labeled “Hydrocortisone 50mg or Placebo”. Hydrocortisone 
placebo will be provided as an identical 3mL syringe as 1mL of normal saline. Two doses of study 
medication will be prepared at a time. 

 
 
Page 7 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
Thiamine:  Intravenous thiamine will be given in a dose of 200mg q 12 hourly for 4 days (or discontinued 
earlier if discharged from the ICU). This will be placed in a 50mL bag of Normal Saline labeled “Thiamine 
200mg or Placebo” and run over 30 minutes (100mL/hr) Placebo patients will receive a matching 50mL 
bag of Normal Saline. One dose will be prepared at a time.  
Power Calculation:  
Based on the results of the preliminary study of Marik et al we project that the combination of 
hydrocortisone, vitamin C and thiamine could reduce time to vasopressor discontinuation from 54 (+/- 
30 hours) versus 30 hours. For the additional primary outcome we projected a greater change of SOFA 
score of 4 (+/- 3) versus 2.  Assuming a type 1 error of 5% (alpha of 0.05) and a power of 80% (the ability 
to detect a difference between two groups when a difference exists) would require a sample size of 94 
patients. To account for dropouts and patients not requiring vasopressor therapy we will therefore aim 
for a sample size of 140 patients.  
Data Collection:  
The following de-identified demographic and clinical data will be collected.  
i. Age  
ii. Sex  
iii. Weight  
iv. Admitting diagnosis and possible site of infection  
v. Blood culture results  
vi. Co-morbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, cardiac failure, COPD, malignancy  
vii. Requirement for mechanical ventilation (Y/N).  
viii. Use of vasopressor agents (Y/N). The hourly dosage of vasopressors will be recorded as the 
norepinephrine equivalent dosage. [70,71]  
ix. Duration of vasopressor use  
x. Time to vasopressor independence from start of active drug/placebo  
xi. Daily urine output (for first 4 days)  

 
 
Page 8 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
xii. Fluid balance after 24 and 72 hours  
xiii. Presence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Presence of AKI: Acute kidney injury (AKI) will be defined using 
the KDIGO criteria; namely, an increase of the s-creatinine > 0.3 mg/dl or a level > 1.5 times the baseline 
value. [27] If the baseline s-creatinine is not known a value > 1.5 mg/dl will be regarded as diagnostic of 
AKI.  
xiv. Length of ICU and hospital stay  
xv. ICU, hospital, and 28-day mortality 
xvi. Routine laboratory data for 4 days including:  
a. serum creatinine  
b. white cell count (WBC)  
c. platelet count  
d. total bilirubin  
e. PaO2/FiO2 ratio  
f. Procalcitonin (PCT) – on days 1 and 4 
g. lactate level  
h. urine oxalate level (day 4) 
xvii. HostDx Sepsis genetic testing (day 1) if consent is provided for additional sub-study. 
xviii. The patients’ admission APACHE II and APACHE IV scores will be recorded. The APACHE IV score 
allows calculation of the predicted hospital mortality and predicted ICU length of stay (LOS).  
ixx. The daily SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score will be recorded for the first 4 
treatment days.  
The APACHE II score (incrementing score of 0-71) and APACHE IV score (incrementing score 0-286) are 
standardized measures of disease severity that are used to predict hospital mortality and ICU LOS. 
[72,73] The SOFA score was designed to sequentially assess the severity of organ dysfunction in patients 
who are critically ill from sepsis (incrementing score 0-24). [74]. The SOFA scores is calculated 24 hours 

 
 
Page 9 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
after admission to the ICU and daily thereafter. SOFA scores that increase by about 30 percent are 
associated with a mortality of at least 50 percent.[75]  
 
Data will be collected in the attached Excel spreadsheet (Appendix A – Sepsis Data spreadsheet). No 
personal identifiers will be recorded on the spreadsheet. We will not be recording names, dates of birth, 
social security or EMR numbers or any other HPI data in the data collection spreadsheet. Each record 
will be assigned a unique study ID number (subject ID key). A separate password protected spreadsheet 
will have a list of subject ID number and the corresponding medical record numbers (Subject ID Key data 
sheet). This spreadsheet will only be accessible to the principle investor and sub-PI. The pharmacist will 
have a copy of the “Research Randomization and Dispensing Log” with an additional field which will 
include the randomization code to active vitamin protocol or placebo. Only the pharmacist will have 
access to the “Research Randomization and Dispensing Log” until after the study is completed, when it 
will be made available to the principle investor and sub-PI.  
Data analysis:  
Summary statistics will be used to describe the clinical data and presented as mean ± SD, median with 
interquartile range (IQR) or percentages as appropriate. Chi squared analysis with Fisher’s exact test 
(when appropriate) and Student’s t test (Mann Whiney U test for non- normal distributions) were used 
to compare data between the active treatment group and the placebo group with statistical significance 
declared for probability values of 0.05 or less.  
Data Safety & storage:  
The main risk to subjects is the accidental release of PHI. Careful record management methods will be in 
place to ensure this type of privacy breach does not occur.  
Subject ID Key: Each subject will be given a unique subject ID number. A subject ID key will be used to 
match the subjects Financial Identification Number (FIN). The subject ID key, linking the subject ID 
numbers to the FIN will be kept in a password-protected file on the pharmacy IV room and pharmacy co-
investigator computer. Only the research team (PI, sub PI and research pharmacists) will have access to 
this information, and they will not disclose this information to any other person or entity. The subject ID 
key will be destroyed as soon as possible after the data set has been completely abstracted and 
validated for accuracy and completeness.  
Data set: Similarly, the data set will be kept in a password-protected file and stored separately from the 

 
 
Page 10 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
subject ID key in the locked office of the study coordinator. Only the research team will have access to 
this information, and they will not disclose this information to any other person or entity. Three years 
after the completion of the study, all collected data will be destroyed by permanently deleting electronic 
copies. 
References  
1. Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S et al. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in 
adults. Lancet 2010; 376:1339-46.  
2. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S et al. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among 
critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA 2014; 311:1308-16.  
3. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ et al. Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in 
the United States. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:1167-74.  
4. Silva E, de Almeida Pedro M, Beltrami Sogayar AC et al. Brazilian Sepsis Epidemiological Study (BASES 
study). Crit Care 2004; 8:R251-R260.  
5. Sales JA, David CM, Hatum R et al. Sepse Brasil: Estudo Epidemiologico da Sepse em Unidades de 
Terapia Intensiva Brasileiras. An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units. Sepsis Brazil 
Study. Rev Bras Ter Int 2006; 18:9-17.  
6. The 10 leading causes of death by country income group 2012. WHO factsheets. 
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index1.html . 2015. World Health Organization. 
5-24-2016.  
7. Wang HE, Szychowski JM, Griffin R et al. Long term mortality after sepsis. Chest 2013.  
8. Artenstein AW, Higgins TL, Opal SM. Sepsis and scientific revolutions. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:2770-
2772.  
9. Fisher BJ, Seropian IM, Masanori Y et al. Ascorbic acid attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute 
lung injury. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:1454-60.  
10. Fisher BJ, Kraskauskas D, Martin EJ et al. Attenuation of sepsis-induced organ injury in mice by 
vitamin C. JPEN 2014; 38:825-39.  
11. Han M, Pendem S, Teh SL et al. Ascorbate protects endothelial barrier function during septic insult: 
Role of protein phosphatase type 2A. Free Radic Biol Med 2010; 48:128.  

 
 
Page 11 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
12. Kim SR. Ascorbic acid reduces HMGB1 secretion in lipopolysaccharide-activated RAW 264.7 cells and 
improves survival rate in septic mice by activation of Nrf2/HO- 1 signals. Biochemical Pharmacology 
2015; 95:279-89.  
13. Bornstein SR, Yoshida-Hiroi M, Sotiriou S et al. Impaired adrenal catecholamine system function in 
mice with deficiency of the ascorbic acid transporter (SVCT2). FASEB Journal 2003; 17:1928-30.  
 14. Wilson JX. Mechanism of action of vitamin C in sepsis: ascorbate modulates redox signaling in 
endothelium. Biofactors 2009; 35:5-13.  
15. Wilson JX. Evaluation of vitamin C for adjuvant sepsis therapy. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 2013; 
19:2129-40.  
16. Marik PE. Critical illness related corticoseroid insufficiency. Chest 2009; 135:181- 93.  
17. Annane D, Bellisant E, Bollaert PE et al. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis (Review). Cochrane 
Database of Syst Rev 2015.  
18. Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Eichacker PQ et al. The effects of steroids during sepsis depend on dose and 
severity of illness: an updated meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009; 15:308-18.  
19. Volbeda M, Wetterslev J, Gluud C et al. Glucocorticosteroids for sepsis: systematic review with meta-
analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1220-1234.  
20. Kalil AC, Sun J. Low-dose steroids for septic shock and severe sepsis; the use of Bayesian statistics to 
resolve clinical trial controversies. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:420-429.  
21. Sprung CL, Annane D, Keh D et al. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. N Engl J 
Med 2008; 358:111-24.  
22. Nathens AB, Neff MJ, Jurkovich GJ et al. Randomized, prospective trial of antioxidant 
supplementation in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg 2002; 236:814-22.  
23. Fowler AA, Syed AA, Knowlson S et al. Phase 1 safety trial of intravenous ascorbic acid in patients 
with severe sepsis. J Transl Med 2014; 12:32.  
24. Zabet MH, Mohammadi M, Ramezani M et al. Effect of high-dose ascorbic acid on vasopressor 
requirement in septic shock. J Res Pharm Pract 2016; 5:94-100.  
25. Tanaka H, Matsuda T, Miyagantani Y et al. Reduction of resuscitation fluid volumes in severely 

 
 
Page 12 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
burned patients using ascorbic acid administration: a randomized, prospective study. Arch Surg 2000; 
135:326-31.  
26. Ma Y, Chapman K, Levine M et al. High-dose parenteral ascorbate enhanced chemosensitivity of 
ovarian cancer and reduced toxicity of chemotherapy. Science Translational Medicine 2014; 6:222ra18.  
27. Padayatty SJ, Rordan HH, Hewitt SM et al. Intravenously administered vitamin C as cancer therapy: 
three cases. CMAJ 2006; 174:937-42.   
28. Hoffer LJ, Robitaille L, Zakarian R et al. High-dose intravenous vitamin C combined with cytotoxic 
chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer: a phase I-II clinical trial. PloS ONE 2015; 10:e0120228.  
29. Hoffer LJ, Levine M, Assouline S et al. Phase I clinical trial of i.v. ascorbic acid in advanced 
malignancy. Annals of Oncology 2008; 19:1969-74.  
30. Stephenson CM, Levin RD, Spector T et al. Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and 
pharmacokinetics of high-dose intravenous ascorbic acid in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer 
Chemotherapy & Pharmacology 2013; 72:139-46.  
31. Monti DA, Mitchell E, Bazzan AJ et al. Phase I evaluation of intravenous ascorbic acid in combination 
with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PloS ONE 2012; 7:e29794.  
32. Welsh JL, Wagner BA, van't Erve TJ et al. Pharmacological ascorbate with gemcitabine for the control 
of metastatic and node-positive pancreatic cancer (PACMAN): results from a phase I clinical trial. Cancer 
Chemother Pharmacol 2013; 71:765-75.  
33. Ohno S, Ohno Y, Suzuki N et al. High-dose vitamin C (ascorbic acid) therapy in the treatment of 
patients with advanced cancer. Anticancer Research 2009; 29:809-15.  
34. de Grooth HJ, Choo WP, Spoelstra-de Man AM et al. Pharmacokinetics of four high- dose regimens of 
intravenous Vitamin C in critically ill patients [Abstract]. Intensive Care Med 2016.  
35. Padayatty SJ, Sun H, Wang Y et al. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics: implications for oral and intravenous 
use. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:533-37.  
36. Long CL, Maull KL, Krishman RS et al. Ascorbic acid dynamics in the seriously ill and injured. J Surg 
Res 2003; 109:144-48.  
37. Ascorbic Acid Injection. http://www.drugs.com/pro/ascorbic-acid-injection.html . 2015. The 
Torrance Company. 6-12-2016.  

 
 
Page 13 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
38. Campbell GD, Steinberg MH, Bower JD. Ascorbic acid-induced hemolysis in G-6-PD deficiency [letter]. 
Ann Intern Med 1975; 82:810.  
39. Rees DC, Kelsey H, Richards JD. Acute haemolysis induced by high dose ascorbic acid in glucose-6-
phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. BMJ 1993; 306:841-42.  
40. Drouin G, Godin JR, Page B. The genetics of Vitamin C loss in vertebrates. Current Genomics 2011; 
12:371-78.  
41. Patak P. Vitamin C is an important cofactor for both adrenal cortex and adrenal medulla. Endocrine 
Research 2004; 30:871-75.  
42. Das DD. Effect of vitamin C on adrenal suppression by etomidate induction in patients undergoing 
cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Cardiac Anaesth 2016; 19:410.  
43. Nooraei N, Fathi M, Edalat L et al. Effect of Vitamin C on serum cortisol after etomidate induction of 
anesthesia. J Cell Mol Anesth 2016; 1:28-33.  
44. Massey LK. Ascorbate increases human oxaluria and kidney stone risk. Journal of Nutrition 2005; 
135:1673-77.  
45. Wandzilak TR. Effect of high dose vitamin C on urinary oxalate levels. Journal of Urology 1994; 
151:834-37.  
46. Hoppe B, Beck BB, Milliner D. The primary hyperoxalurias. Kidney Int 2009; 75:1264-71.  
47. Sidhu H, Gupta R, Thind SK et al. Oxalate metabolism in thiamine-deficient rats. Ann Nutr Metab 
1987; 31:354-61.  
48. Ortiz-Alvarado O, Muyaoka R, Kriedberg C et al. Pyridoxine and dietary counseling for the 
management of idiopathic hyperoxaluria in stone-forming patients. Urology 2011; 77:1054-58.  
49. Donnino MW, Andersen LW, Chase M et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial of 
thiamine as a metabolic resuscitator in septic shock: A pilot study. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:360-367.  
50. Moskowitz A, Anderson LW, Cocchi MN et al. Thiamine as a renal protective agent in septic shock: A 
secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc 
2017;http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-656BC.  
51. Aird WC. The role of the endothelium in severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. 

 
 
Page 14 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
Blood 2003; 101:3765-77.  
52. Marik PE, Pastores SM, Annane D et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of 
corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: Consensus statements from an international 
task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:1937-49.  
53. Okamoto K, Tanaka H, Makino Y et al. Restoration of the glucocorticoid receptor function by the 
phosphodiester compound of vitamins C and E, EPC-K1 (L-ascorbic acid 2-[3,4-dihydro-2,5,7,8-
tetramethyl-2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)-2H-1- benzopyran-6-yl hydrogen phosphate] potassium salt), 
via a redox-dependent mechanism. Biochem Pharmacol 1998; 56:79-86.  
54. Fujita I, Hirano J, Itoh N et al. Dexamethasone induces sodium-dependant vitamin C transporter in a 
mouse osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1. Br J Nutr 2001; 86:145-49.  
55. Barabutis N, Khangoora V, Marik PE et al. Hydrocortisone and Ascorbic Acid synergistically protect 
against LPS-induced pulmonary endothelial barrier dysfunction. Chest 2017; Submitted.  
56. Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R et al. Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C and Thiamine for the treatment of 
severe sepsis and septic shock: A retrospective before-after study. Chest 2017; 
ePub:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036.  
57. Marik PE. The physiology of volume resuscitation. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2014; 4:353-59.  
58. Marik PE. Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure. Ann 
Intensive Care 2014; 4:21.  
59. Marik P, Bellomo R. A rational apprach to fluid therapy in sepsis. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116:339-49.  
60. Marik PE. Fluid responsiveness and the six guiding principles of fluid resuscitation. Crit Care Med 
2016; 44:1920-1922.  
61. Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care 
2016; 6:111.  
62. Marik PE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Bittner EA et al. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, 
patterns and outcomes. An analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:625-32.  
63. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for 
Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377.  
64. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT et al. A Randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic 

 
 
Page 15 of 15 
Version 5 – 13 May 2019 
shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1683-93.  
65. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power S et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N 
Engl J Med 2015; 372:1301-11.  
66. Peake SL, Delasney A, Bailey M et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with Early Septic Shock. 
N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1496-506.  
67. de Azevedo JR, Torres OJ, Beraldi RA et al. Prognostic evaluation of severe sepsis and septic shock: 
procalcitonin clearance vs DELTA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. J Crit Care 2015; 30:219-12.  
68. Ruiz-Rodriguez JC, Caballero J, Ruiz-Sanmartin A et al. Usefulness of procalcitonin clearance as a 
prognostic biomarker in septic shock. A prospective pilot study. Medicina Intensiva 2012; 36:475-80.  
69. Flannery AH, Adkins DA, Cook AM. Unpeeling the evidence for the Banana Bag: Evidence-based 
recommendations for the management of alcohol-associated vitamin and electrolyte deficiencies in the 
ICU. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:1545-52.  
70. Mancl EE, Muzevich KM. Tolerability and safety of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving 
intravenous vasopressor therapy. JPEN 2013; 37:641-51.  
71. Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J et al. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with 
septic shock. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:877-87.  
72. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP et al. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit 
Care Med 1985; 13:818-28.  
73. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS et al. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 
(APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006; 
34:1297-310.  
74. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to 
describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the 
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:707-10.  
75. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A et al. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically 
ill patients. JAMA 2001; 286:1754-58.