A Phase 2 Pilot Study of BMN 673 (Talazoparib), an Oral PARP Inhibitor, in Patients With Deleterious BRCA1/2 Mutation-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Had Prior PARP Inhibitor Treatment
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Ovarian Cancer
Sponsor: National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Amendment
Protocol Number:
15C0050-C
Principal Investigator: Jung-Min Lee 
NCI 
WMB 
301.443.7735 
leej6@mail.nih.gov
(NIH Employee Name, Institute/Branch, Telephone and e-mail)
Reference Number:
362470
Protocol Title:
A Phase 2 Pilot Study of BMN 673 (Talazoparib), an Oral PARP Inhibitor, in Patients with Deleterious BRCA1/2 Mutation-Associated 
Ovarian Cancer who have had prior PARP Inhibitor Treatment 
SIGNATURES
Principal Investigator (*): 
Jung-Min Lee - applied signature on 09/30/2016 2:14 PM EDT
Accountable Investigator:
PI is the Accountable Investigator
Branch Chief/CC Department Head (**):
Stan Lipkowitz - applied signature on 09/30/2016 4:03 PM EDT
Medical Advisory Investigator (if applicable):
N/A
Lead Associate Investigator signature:
N/A
Referral Contact signatures:
N/A
Associate Investigators signatures:
N/A
For Institute/Center Scientific Review Committee:
N/A
Other IC Clinical Director signatures:
N/A
APPROVALS
IRB Chair:
Michael Hamilton - applied signature on 10/05/2016 5:58 PM EDT
Clinical Director:
N/A
CONCURRENCE
OPS Protocol Specialist:
Signature
Print Name
Date
* Signature signifies that investigators on this protocol have been informed that the collection and use of personally identifiable information at
the NIH are maintained in a system of record governed under provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. The information provided is mandatory for
employees of the NIH to perform their assigned duties as related to the administration and reporting of intramural research protocols and
used solely for those purposes.  Questions may be addressed to the Protrak System Owner.
** I have reviewed this research project and considered the NIH Policy for Inclusion of Women and Minorities in Clinical Research. Taking into 
account the overall impact that the project could have on the research field involved, I feel the current plans adequately includes both sex/
gender, minorities, children, and special populations, as appropriate. The current enrollment is in line with the planned enrollment report for 
inclusion of individuals on the basis of their sex/gender, race, and ethnicity and is appropriate and of scientific and technical merit. 
IRB Meeting Date:
Expedited
DEC Clearance Date:
09/01/2016
Protocol Version Date:08/08/2016
Royal Reed 
 
 
 
AM C 
 
 
     10/11/16

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
NCI Protocol #: 9632 
Local Protocol #: 15-C-0050, Amendment C 
TITLE:  A phase 2 pilot study of BMN 673 (Talazoparib), an oral PARP inhibitor, in patients 
with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation-associated ovarian cancer who have had prior 
PARP inhibitor treatment 
 
Coordinating Center: 
 
 
National Cancer Institute 
NCI Principal Investigator: 
Jung-min Lee, M.D. A, B, C 
 
Women’s Malignancies Branch (WMB),  
 
Center for Cancer Research (CCR)  
 
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 
 
Bldg. 10, Rm. 12N226, 10 Center Drive 
 
Bethesda, MD 20892-1906 
 
Phone: 301-443-7735, Fax: 301-402-0172 
 
leej6@mail.nih.gov 
NIH Associate Investigators: 
 
 
 
Stanley Lipkowitz, MD, PhD, WMB, CCR, NCI B, C 
Christina M. Annunziata, MD, PhD, WMB, CCR, NCI B, C 
 
 
 
Lori Minasian, MD, WMB, CCR, and DCP, NCI B, C 
 
 
 
Alexandra Zimmer, MD, OCD, CCR, NCI A, B, C 
                   
 
Nicole Houston, RN, OCD, CCR, NCI B, C 
 
 
 
Brad Wood, MD, DRD, CC, NIH B, C 
 
NIH Non-clinical Scientific Associate Investigators: 
                   
 
Jane Trepel, DTB, CCR, NCI F 
Collaborators:  
Elizabeth Swisher, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, WAF 
James D. Brenton, MD, University of Cambridge, UKF 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Statistician:                                 Seth M. Steinberg, PhD, BDMS, CCR, NCI F 
 
 
 
Study Coordinator:   
     Nicole Houston, RN, OCD, CCR, NCI B, C 
 
Referral Contacts:  
Nicole Houston, RN, OCD, CCR, NCI B, C 
 
 
 
Irene Ekwede, RN, OCD, CCR, NCI B, C 
 
 
A. Obtain information by intervening or interacting with 
living individuals for research purposes 
B. Obtaining identifiable private information about 
living individuals 
C. Obtaining the voluntary informed consent of 
individuals to be subjects 
D. Makes decisions about subject eligibility 
E. Studying, interpreting, or analyzing identifiable 
private information or data/specimens for research 
purposes 
F. Studying, interpreting, or analyzing de-identified data 
or specimens for research purposes 
G. Some/all research activities performed outside NIH 
 
 
 
Investigational Agents:   
Drug Name: 
BMN 673 (Talazoparib), 
NSC 771561 
IND Number: 
119558 
Sponsor: 
CTEP   
Manufacturer: 
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
PRÉCIS  
Background: 
• Patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAm) demonstrate repeated therapeutic 
susceptibility to DNA damaging agents, especially platinums, even if they have 
previously progressed on a similar (platinum-based) regimen.  
• PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have clinical activity in gBRCAm-associated malignancies, 
although patients eventually develop progressive disease.     
• BMN 673 (talazoparib) is a novel PARPi, with excellent oral bioavailability and greater 
anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo at lower concentrations than first generation 
PARPi.   
• It is unknown whether secondary BRCA mutations or other potential mechanisms of 
clinical resistance portend cross-resistance to a highly potent PARPi. 
Objectives: 
• To determine the objective response rate (CR+PR) of single agent BMN 673 
(talazoparib) in ovarian cancer patients with gBRCAm who have progressed on prior 
PARPi therapy. 
Eligibility: 
• Women with recurrent and/or metastatic gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancer, with 
progression on PARPi monotherapy within the immediate prior 2 months of the time of 
screening visit. 
• Patients should have responded to their prior PARPi therapy (CR, PR or SD>4months).   
• Patients cannot have received another therapy between stopping their first PARPi therapy 
and initiating therapy on this trial, but must be off the prior PARPi for at least 4 weeks.  
• ECOG performance status 0-2 and adequate organ and marrow function. 
Design: 
• This is an open label, single arm phase II trial to examine activity of BMN 673 
(talazoparib). 
• Patients will receive BMN 673 (talazoparib) at the RP2D of 1mg p.o. once daily on 28 
day cycles.   
• Research samples including whole blood, plasma, CTCs, and tumor biopsies will be 
obtained for PD endpoints at baseline, ~cycle 1 day 29 (prior to cycle 2 day 1), and/or at 
progression in all patients. 
• Patients will be evaluated every two cycles for response using RECISTv1.1 criteria and 
every cycle for safety using CTCAEv4.0. 
 
 
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
SCHEMA 
 
 
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
PRÉCIS ............................................................................................................................................3 
SCHEMA .........................................................................................................................................4 
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................5 
1 
OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................8 
1.1 
Primary Objective ....................................................................................................8 
1.2 
Secondary Objectives...............................................................................................8 
1.3 
Exploratory Objective ..............................................................................................8 
2 
BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................8 
2.1 
Study Disease ...........................................................................................................8 
2.2 
BMN 673 (talazoparib), a novel, highly potent oral PARPi ..................................11 
2.3 
Potential biomarkers and mechanisms of PARP inhibitor clinical 
resistance ................................................................................................................19 
2.4 
Rationale ................................................................................................................23 
3 
PATIENT SELECTION ....................................................................................................23 
3.1 
Eligibility Criteria ..................................................................................................23 
3.2 
Exclusion Criteria ..................................................................................................24 
3.3 
Inclusion of Women and Minorities ......................................................................25 
4 
REGISTRATION PROCEDURES ...................................................................................25 
5 
TREATMENT PLAN ........................................................................................................26 
5.1 
Screening Evaluation .............................................................................................26 
5.2 
Baseline evaluation ................................................................................................26 
5.3 
Agent Administration.............................................................................................26 
5.4 
General Concomitant Medication and Supportive Care Guidelines ......................27 
5.5 
Duration of Therapy ...............................................................................................27 
5.6 
Duration of Follow Up ...........................................................................................28 
5.7 
Off-Study Procedure ..............................................................................................28 
6 
DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS ...............................................................28 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
7 
SAFETY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS/DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING 
PLAN .................................................................................................................................31 
7.1 
Definitions..............................................................................................................31 
7.2 
Adverse Events:  List And Reporting Requirements .............................................33 
7.3 
Comprehensive Adverse Events and Potential Risks List (CAEPR).....................34 
7.4 
Adverse Event Characteristics ...............................................................................36 
7.5 
Expedited Adverse Event Reporting to CTEP .......................................................37 
7.6 
Routine Adverse Event Reporting to CTEP ..........................................................38 
7.7 
NCI-IRB Reporting ................................................................................................38 
7.8 
Secondary Malignancy...........................................................................................39 
7.9 
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan ...........................................................................40 
8 
PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION ..........................................................................40 
8.1 
CTEP IND Agent: BMN 673 (talazoparib) (IND# 119558; NSC 771561)...........40 
8.2 
Agent Ordering and Agent Accountability ............................................................41 
8.3 
Agent Inventory Records .......................................................................................41 
9 
BIOMARKER, CORRELATIVE, AND SPECIAL STUDIES ........................................42 
9.1 
Tumor biopsies.......................................................................................................43 
9.2 
Secondary mutations of BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 .....................................................44 
9.3 
Tissue lysate array proteomic analysis ..................................................................45 
9.4 
Laser capture microdissection and Sanger sequencing analyses for 
secondary mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 ........................................................45 
9.5 
Data Sharing Plans .................................................................................................47 
9.6 
PTIP mRNA quantitative PCR ..............................................................................47 
9.7 
SLFN11 (Schlafen 11) mRNA quantitative PCR ..................................................47 
9.8 
Tests on Peripheral Blood samples ........................................................................48 
9.9 
Sample Storage, Tracking and Disposition ............................................................50 
9.10 
Protocol Completion/Sample Destruction .............................................................50 
10 
DATA REPORTING / REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ...........................................51 
10.1 
Data Reporting .......................................................................................................51 
10.2 
Collaborative Agreements Language .....................................................................51 
10.3 
Data Collection ......................................................................................................53 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
11 
STUDY CALENDAR .......................................................................................................54 
12 
MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT........................................................................................55 
12.1 
Antitumor Effect – Solid Tumors ..........................................................................55 
13 
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS ............................................................................60 
13.1 
Rationale For Subject Selection .............................................................................60 
13.2 
Participation of Children ........................................................................................60 
13.3 
Evaluation of Benefits and Risks/Discomforts ......................................................61 
13.4 
Risks/Benefits Analysis .........................................................................................61 
13.5 
Consent and Assent Process and Documentation ..................................................61 
14 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS...............................................................................62 
14.1 
Study Design/Endpoints.........................................................................................62 
14.2 
Sample Size/Accrual Rate ......................................................................................63 
14.3 
Reporting and Exclusions ......................................................................................64 
15 
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................66 
16 
APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................71 
16.1 
Appendix A: Performance Status Criteria .............................................................71 
16.2 
Appendix B. Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure- Tissue Core 
Collection ...............................................................................................................72 
16.3 
Appendix C: Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure- Plasma and Buffy 
coat collection for circulating tumor DNA ............................................................74 
16.4 
Appendix D: Patient Drug Administration Diary ..................................................76 
 
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
1 
OBJECTIVES 
1.1 
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE 
1.1.1 To determine the objective response rate (CR+PR) of the single agent BMN 673 
(talazoparib) in ovarian cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAm) 
who have progressed on prior PARP inhibitor (PARPi) therapy. 
1.2 
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES 
1.2.1 To determine the safety and toxicity of BMN 673 (talazoparib) in patients with 
gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancer in the second PARPi exposure setting. 
1.2.2 To determine the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gBRCAm-associated 
ovarian cancer in the second PARPi exposure setting. 
1.2.3 To compare PFS on BMN 673 (talazoparib) with the PFS from the first PARPi exposure. 
1.2.4 To determine if a tumor gain-of-function mutation in BRCA1/2 occurred after initial 
PARPi exposure. 
1.3 
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE 
1.3.1 To correlate biochemical changes in the DNA damage repair proteins and/or other 
pathways in tumor and blood with response to treatment. 
2 
BACKGROUND 
2.1 
STUDY DISEASE 
Approximately 15% of high grade serous ovarian cancers are deficient in homologous 
recombination 1 DNA double strand break (DSB) repair due to germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 
mutation (gBRCAm).2 Patients with gBRCAm ovarian cancers have increased therapeutic 
susceptibility to platinums,3 thus, often receive multiple lines of platinum-based chemotherapy 
and have a longer median survival time than those without gBRCAm.3-6 They are also more 
sensitive than other ovarian cancers to DNA-damaging agents, such as pegylated liposomal 
doxorubicin, even after acquiring platinum resistance.7 Our phase 1 study of olaparib and 
carboplatin (08-C-0092) also confirms that gBRCAm carriers with platinum resistant/refractory 
disease can have repeated clinical benefit from platinum-based regimens.8 Our study yielded a 
clinical benefit rate of 70% in 20 gBRCAm patients with platinum resistant/refractory ovarian 
cancer. We observed a 25% PR and 45% SD, and with a median duration of response of 5 
months (4+-17) and 10.5 months (4-25), respectively. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors 
(PARPi) have demonstrated promising results in preclinical and clinical studies, as a 
monotherapy or in combination therapy in gBRCAm-associated malignancies. Moderate 
response rates and prolonged time to progression have been seen, although patients eventually 
develop progressive disease, and require subsequent treatments. Retrospective studies have 
indicated that these patients do not lose susceptibility to other chemotherapeutic agents after 
treatment with a PARPi.9 Thus, it is plausible to speculate that ovarian cancer patients with 
gBRCAm may have a second clinical response to another PARPi after prior progressive disease 
on the first PARPi.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Ang et al10 recently reported gBRCAm carriers with ovarian cancer respond well to 
chemotherapy, including platinum-based regimens, after developing progressive disease on 
olaparib monotherapy; all patients received olaparib  >200mg bid dosing, for at least 1 month. 
The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 36% (24/67 patients) by RECIST and was 45% 
(35/78) by RECIST and/or GCIG-CA125 criteria, with median progression-free survival (PFS) 
and overall survival (OS) of 17 weeks and 34 weeks, respectively. This response rate (RR) is 
similar to that seen in initially platinum-sensitive patients who have had a platinum-free interval 
of over 24 months.11 This efficacy of post-olaparib chemotherapy in gBRCAm carriers was 
greater than expected given that ORR to second or advanced lines of chemotherapy in recurrent 
ovarian cancer is below 20%.12 BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, and PTEN were examined by massively 
parallel sequencing in 6 patient tumor samples from that study and there was no evidence of 
revertant mutations in BRCA1. This and other studies have led to an estimated frequency of such 
mutations, adjusted for sample size, to be a relatively uncommon event (12.5% [95%-CI: 0-
37.5%]). 9 13  
Preclinical data14-16 suggest that exposure to PARPi may occur and if so, may compromise 
benefit to subsequent treatment.  One documented mechanism is acquisition of secondary 
mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2. There are no comprehensive clinical studies to date examining 
the prevalence of secondary BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in patients who have received and 
progressed on PARPi, and whether they will respond to the subsequent PARPi. A retrospective 
study by Norquist et al13 showed 13 of 46 women (23%) with gBRCAm-associated recurrent 
ovarian cancer had revertant mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2, restoring wild-type sequencing 
after multiple chemotherapies. Twelve (46.2%) of 26 platinum-resistant ovarian cancers within 
that group had secondary mutations after platinum-based chemotherapy, compared with one 
(5.3%) of 19 with platinum-sensitive disease (p = 0.003). Six patients with platinum-resistant 
recurrent ovarian cancer were then treated with olaparib-based therapy. One of three patients 
with known secondary mutations restoring BRCA1 and BRCA2 function had a partial response 
to olaparib-based therapy. Thus, it is unclear whether secondary BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations 
do predict poor second clinical response to PARPi or platinum-based therapy. Additionally, it is 
unknown whether this predicts cross-resistance to a second PARPi, independently of PARPi 
potency. Hence, we hypothesize that patients with gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancer may 
respond to a second, possibly more potent PARPi, after progressive disease on a PARPi.      
Investigating the clinical response, dissecting and defining mechanisms of clinical resistance to 
PARPi, and examining cross-resistance to another PARPi and other DNA damaging agents is 
critical. The PARPi-treated gBRCAm group is now emerging as a new patient population with 
unmet therapeutic needs. Our study will lead to optimal application and sequencing of PARPi 
administration, and create an opportunity for identification of predictive biomarkers for the 
subsequent use of another PARPi.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
 
Figure 1. DNA double strand and single strand breaks repair pathways   
PARPi were initially thought to mediate their antitumor effects as catalytic inhibitors of PARP-1 
and PARP-2, and block repair of DNA single strand break (SSB). However, the mechanism(s) of 
action of PARPi are not fully understood (Figure1). Dr. Pommier’s group in the Developmental 
Therapeutics Branch/CCR reported a new mechanism14. They showed that PARPi trap the 
PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes at damaged DNA sites, preventing DNA replication and 
transcription. Trapped PARP–DNA complexes were more cytotoxic than unrepaired SSBs 
caused by catalytic PARP inhibition. Moreover, there is different potency in PARP trapping 
among PARPi (niraparib and olaparib >> veliparib), which correlates with their different anti-
tumor activities in early clinical studies. PARPi that bind to the catalytic domain can 
allosterically alter the binding affinity of PARP enzyme to DNA. BMN 673 (talazoparib) is the 
most potent PARP-trapping PARPi, and more cytotoxic at an equimolar concentration, than 
olaparib, in both BRCA mutated- and BRCA-wild type cell lines.17 Trapping of PARP-DNA 
complexes also leads to replication fork damage but utilizes additional repair pathways including 
the Fanconi pathway (FA), template switching (TS), ATM, FEN1 (replicative flap 
endonuclease), and polymerase b proteins. BMN 673 (talazoparib)’s trapping activity could be 
another mechanism to further stress chromosomal instability and apoptosis in tumors with 
revertant mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2.  
Approximately 95% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) have p53 dysfunction. This 
leads cells to proceed prematurely into mitosis with incompletely replicated and broken 
chromosomes due to the absence of the G2/M checkpoints, ultimately arrest in prometaphase. 
More replication origins are activated than the replication apparatus can tolerate in early S phase, 
resulting in slowed and arrested DNA replication forks, and DNA DSB. Thus, it is postulated 
that PARP-DNA trapping alone can generate DNA damage and mitotic catastrophe in either HR-

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
competence or - incompetence HGSOC cells, despite the absence of DNA damage by external 
agents. 
2.2 
BMN 673 (TALAZOPARIB), A NOVEL, HIGHLY POTENT ORAL PARPI  
2.2.1 Preclinical data 
Preclinical studies of BMN 673 (talazoparib)18 confirm that BMN 673 (talazoparib) is a highly 
potent PARP1/2 inhibitor (PARP1 IC50 = 0.57 nM), with anti-tumor cytotoxicity at lower 
concentrations than earlier generation PARPi (Table 1).  
Table 1. In vitro activities of BMN 673 (Talazoparib) and other PARP inhibitors18 
 
Activities of BMN 673 (talazoparib), LT-00628, and three clinical PARPi, veliparib, rucaparib, and 
olaparib were compared in three in vitro assays: (i) IC50 for PARP1 enzymatic activity; 19 cellular PAR 
synthesis inhibition IC50 in human colon adenocarcinoma (LoVo) cells; and (iii) Capan-1 cell survival 
IC50 in a single-agent cytotoxicity assay.  Values are average data from three to four independent 
experiments. 
In vitro, BMN 673 (talazoparib) selectively targeted tumor cells with BRCA1/2 mutation or 
PTEN deficiency, with 20- to >200-fold greater potency than first generation PARPi. Several 
PARPi were screened for the concentration required to elicit a 20% reduction in cell survival 
(surviving fraction 80, SF80). SF80 was achieved with a nanomolar concentration of BMN 673 
(talazoparib) (12.5nM) in a moderately PARPi-resistant triple negative breast cancer cell line 
(CAL51), compared to the micromolar concentrations of other PARPi. Further, SF50 data also 
indicate BMN 673 (talazoparib) is highly potent in BRCA1/2 and PTEN deficient cell lines 
(Table 2). It has single-agent cytotoxicity in BRCA1 mutant MX-1 breast cancer cells (IC50 0.3 
nM) and BRCA2 mutant CAPAN-1 cells (IC50 5nM).  
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Table 2. BMN 673 (Talazoparib) is highly potent in BRCA1/2 and PTEN deficient cell 
lines18 
 
A variety of cultured human tumor cell lines were treated with veliparib, rucaparib, olaparib, or BMN 673 
(talazoparib), and tumor-killing effects were assessed either by colony formation assays (SUM149) or 
two-dimensional cytotoxicity assays (all other cell lines). Survival curves were plotted and the IC50 was 
calculated. Known deficiency of HR DNA repair genes is indicated in parenthesis. Cells with 
BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations or PTEN deficiency were more sensitive to all PARPi than cells lacking these 
mutations. 
Further, three PARPi including BMN 673 (talazoparib), olaparib and rucaparib were examined in 
wild type, and BRCA2-truncated mutant (BRCA2tr/-) genetically engineered avian B-
lymphoblast DT40 cells.20 Cell viability assays showed markedly reduced ATP concentrations in 
both HR-deficient (BRCA2tr/-) and wild type DT40 cells by PARPi (Figure 2A). Three PARPi 
were also examined by cell viability assay in both human Ewing’s sarcoma (EW8) and prostate 
cancer (DU145) cell lines. These cell lines are known to be susceptible to PARP inhibition due 
to interaction between PARP1 and ERG to inhibit ETS gene fusion protein activity. Inhibition of 
PARP1 was reported to reduce ETS-positive, but not ETS-negative, prostate cancer xenograft 
growth.21 Olaparib and rucaparib were again less cytotoxic than BMN 673 (talazoparib) in EW8 
and DU145 cells (Figure 2B). These results show a greater PARP-mediated cytotoxicity of BMN 
673 (talazoparib) than olaparib and rucaparib in comparable molar concentrations, leading to the 
possibility that there may be greater potency with at least similar if not improved outcome.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
 
Figure 2. Cell viability with PARPi in in vitro models. Survival curves of wild type, PARP1-
/-, and BRCA2tr/- DT40 cells (A: left), and DU145 and EW8 cells (B: right).22  
For all experiments, viability curves were derived after continuous treatment for 72 hours with the 
indicated PARPi in the indicated cell lines.  
 
BMN 673 (talazoparib) is readily orally bioavailable, with >50% absolute oral bioavailability in 
rats when dosed in carboxylmethyl cellulose. Xenografted tumors carrying defects in DNA 
repair due to BRCA1/2 mutation or PTEN deficiency are profoundly sensitive to oral BMN 673 
(talazoparib) treatment at doses well tolerated in mice. Once daily oral dosing of BMN 673 
(talazoparib) at 0.33 mg/kg/day results in complete response in the MX-1 tumor model (Figure 
3). At the lower dose of 0.1mg/kg, oral BMN 673 (talazoparib) have only a small effect on tumor 
growth after extended treatment (>21days), but is still more effective than olaparib dosed orally 
at 100mg/kg once daily. BMN 673 (talazoparib) is well tolerated at these doses (0.33mg/kg and 
0.1 mg/kg), with no animal lethality or significant weight loss observed after 28 consecutive, 
daily, oral doses. Pharmacodynamic studies also demonstrate potent PARP inhibition by BMN 
673 (talazoparib) in mouse tumor biopsies.  
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
 
  
Figure 3. In vivo anti-tumor activity of BMN 673 (Talazoparib)18 
BMN 673 (talazoparib) exhibits antitumor activity against a BRCA-mutant tumor model in mice. 
MX-1 human mammary xenografts were inoculated subcutaneously in female athymic nu/nu 
mice. When tumors reached an average volume of approximately 150 mm3 (range, 100–196 
mm3), mice were randomized into various treatment groups, and were treated orally, once daily 
for 28 consecutive days, with BMN 673 (talazoparib) (0.33 or 0.1 mg/kg/d), olaparib (100 
mg/kg/d), or empty vehicle. Median tumor volume was plotted against days of treatment (first 
day of treatment is defined at day 1). 
 
Hence, this highly active agent is the ideal agent to examine in ovarian cancer patients with prior 
PARPi exposure due to its a) increased molar activity, b) greater PARP trapping activity, c) oral 
bioavailability, d) manageable drug class side effects, and e) novelty.  
 
2.2.2 Preliminary clinical data 
Dose 
Two phase I dose escalation studies are ongoing (study PRP-001; NCT01286987, and study 
PRP-002; NCT01399840, 2013 IB). The first-in-human phase 1 (PRP-001; Table 3) is a 2-part, 
single-arm study in patients with advanced solid tumors considered to have defects in DNA-
repair pathways, particularly those with BRCA and PTEN dysfunction. Preliminary PRP-001 
study results indicate BMN 673 (talazoparib) is well tolerated with anti-tumor activity in patients 
with gBRCAm, yielding a single agent recommended phase II trial dose of 1000 µg/d continuous 
daily dosing in 4-week cycles. 39 patients (33F/6M) were enrolled in 9 cohorts dosed from 25 to 
1100 µg/d, defining a MTD of 1000 µg/d. Inhibition of PARP activity in PBMCs was observed 
at doses ≥ 100 µg/d. The expansion cohort included tumors with gBRCAm, including 17 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
gBRCAm ovarian/primary peritoneal, 6 gBRCAm breast, 1 gBRCA2m pancreas, and 1 
gBRCA2m prostate cancers.  
Table 3. Dose Levels (DLs): phase I studies of BMN 673 (Talazoparib) in advanced cancer 
patients (total 47 patients) 
 
a Includes data from ongoing trials (2013 IB).  
b One patient received a single dose at 1100 μg/day prior to that dose level being deemed above the MTD. 
 
BMN 673 (talazoparib) has also been examined in subjects (PRP-002) with advanced 
hematological malignancies (arm 1) or with other defects in DNA-repair pathways, including 
RAD51 or ATM dysfunction (arm 2). The initial cohort of patients was treated with 100 μg 
BMN 673 (talazoparib) once daily. At the time of the Investigational Brochure Ver. 3 (dated 11 
March 2013) update, 29 patients have been enrolled dosed up to 1350 μg/day.  
 
Adverse events interim summary  
Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia in 1 of 6 and 2 of 5 patients at 900 and 
1100 µg/d, respectively, in patients on the PRP-001 study. No DLTs have occurred in arm 1 of 
the PRP-002 study. In arm 2 of a PRP-002 study, dose-limiting events of grade 4 neutropenia 
occurred in 2 of 5 patients receiving 900 μg/day, with one of the patients experiencing 
neutropenic sepsis. 
The most common grade 3/4 adverse events 19 related to BMN 673 (talazoparib) were 
hematologic toxicities, consistent with known PARPi class effects: 
• Seven patients have reported grade 3 anemia. One patient experienced an SAE of grade 3 
anemia; other six events were not drug-related. 
• Seven patients have reported AEs of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (4 in PRP-001, and 3 in 
PRP-002). All events were considered to be non-serious. 
• Eight patients have reported AEs of grade 3/4 neutropenia. One patient experienced an 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
SAE of grade 3 neutropenic sepsis; all other events have been reported as non- serious. 
 
A total of 50 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported occurring in 30 of 76 patients (39.5%) 
in both studies, including febrile neutropenia (4), and anemia (2). Only two SAEs were described 
as related to BMN 673 (talazoparib): grade 3 anemia, and neutropenic sepsis.  
No treatment-related deaths were reported. Nine patient deaths occurring on the study PRP-001 
were attributed to either rapid disease progression (7), or other causes, including pneumonia (1), 
and renal impairment (1).   
Other drug-related and dose-related AEs have included alopecia, fatigue, and gastrointestinal 
side effects.   
Pharmacokinetics 
Interim PK data were available from 39 patients across the dosing range of 25 - 1100 µg (study 
PRP-001; 2013 IB). Patients received a single dose on day 1 and were followed for PK 
assessments for 7 days. On day 8, patients started daily dosing through day 35 (Figure 4). On day 
35, patients were followed for 7 days without additional dosing for washout PK assessments. 
Overall, BMN 673 (talazoparib) plasma concentrations peaked 1-2 hrs post-dose, and exposure 
increased dose proportionally. Most patients obtained steady-state plasma concentrations by the 
end of the second week of daily dosing (day 22). 
 
Figure 4. Mean PK profiles by dose of BMN 673 (Talazoparib) 
Mean BMN 673 (talazoparib) plasma concentration by dosing through cycle 1 of part 1 of PRP-001 
NRT: normal relative time 
Following a single dose, mean plasma Cmax and AUC0-24hr ranged from 788 to 13,200 pg/mL and 
from 9,140 to 92,100 pg-hr/mL, respectively, over the 200 to 1100 μg dose range. Steady state 
was apparent in most patients by two weeks with daily dosing. Following single doses, BMN 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
673 (talazoparib) Cmax and AUC0-24hr were linear between 400 and 1100 μg. Following multiple 
doses, BMN 673 (talazoparib) Cmax and AUC0-24hr were linear between 25 and 1100 μg/day. 
Table 4 shows a summary of the resulting PK parameters (2013IB).  
 
Table 4. PK parameters: phase I studies of BMN 673 (Talazoparib) in advanced cancer 
patients 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
  
  
 
Table 5 also shows the comparison of in vitro and plasma concentration of BMN 673 
(talazoparib) with other PARPi.   
Table 5. Plasma concentration and in vitro concentration of BMN 673 (Talazoparib) and 
other PARPi.  
 
Olaparib(AZD2281) 
 
Veliparib(ABT888) 
BMN 673 
(Talazoparib)  
Biologically active dose 
400mg oral twice daily 
300mg oral twice daily 
0.025 to 1.1mg 
oral daily 
(RP2D 1mg 
daily) 
Physiologically 
attainable blood 
level in patients 
Cmax ss 
1.45 to 11.0 μg/mL 
(3.34 to 25.3 μM) with 
50 to 400mg (Astra 
Zeneca IB) 
0.9µmol/L with 50mg 
(Kummar et al JCO 
2009) 
 
0.3 to 25.4 
ng/mL 
(=0.79 to 66.8 
nM) 
AUC0-
24SS 
6.56 – 122 ug-hr/mL. 
Not available  
3.96 – 203 ng-
hr/mL 
IC50 in vitro 
Up to 20µM in 
BRCAwt 
(0.2 to 4 µM in 
gBRCA1/2m breast and 
ovarian cancer cell 
lines) 
> 20µM in BRCA wild-
type and gBRCA2m 
ovarian cancer (1.9 to 4.4 
µM in gBRCA1/2m 
breast and ovarian cancer 
cell lines) 
0.3 to 5nM 
 
Preliminary activity data 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
As of this writing, one patient with platinum resistant ovarian cancer achieved a complete 
response. RECIST and/or CA-125 responses occurred in 19/28 (68%) gBRCAm 
ovarian/peritoneal cancer patients (RECIST response only 11/25 [44%]). Objective responses 
occurred in 7/18 (38%) gBRCAm breast cancer patients.  
2.3 
POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS AND MECHANISMS OF PARP INHIBITOR CLINICAL RESISTANCE     
It has been demonstrated that increased DNA repair capacity in tumor cells is associated with 
resistance to platinums, alkylators, or radiation, and significantly limits the efficacy of these 
agents in most diseases.23 Potential mechanisms of clinical resistance to PARPi include but not 
limited to (1) restoration of BRCA function due to secondary BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations as 
discussed above; (2) increased activity of RAD51; (3) loss of 53BP1; and, (4) downregulation of 
DNA-PKcs or KU 80, key proteins in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) activity.  
 
Figure 5. Potential mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors: (1) increased RAD51 repair 
activity (2) loss of 53BP1 or loss PTIP (3) down regulation of key proteins (DNA-PK or Ku80) in NHEJ 
For BRCA2, secondary mutation was in part due to intragenic deletion of the c.6174delT 
mutation with restoration of an open reading frame and production of functional protein.24 
Reconstitution of BRCA2-deficient cells with these revertant BRCA2 alleles abrogated PARPi 
sensitivity and HR deficiency, shown by recovery of RAD51 foci formation in response to 
treatment with PARPi and radiation.15 BRCA2-mutated breast cancer cell lines and the CAPAN1 
pancreatic cancer cell line; both situations were cross-resistant to PARPi. Subsequently, selected 
BRCA2 mutation carriers with recurrent ovarian tumors with acquired cisplatin resistance were 
found to have undergone secondary mutation with reversion of its BRCA2 functional loss.16 This 
and other studies have led to an estimated frequency of such mutations are relatively uncommon 
event (12.5-23%). 9 13 Hence, if patients acquire mutations in BRCA2 that restore HR 
functionality, they may develop clinical resistance to PARPi treatment, whereas platinum-
resistant BRCA2-mutated tumors without secondary BRCA2 mutations may remain sensitive to 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
PARPi.13,15,16 However, the recent publication10 demonstrated no evidence for secondary BRCA 
mutations in patients who developed resistance to olaparib. Therefore, alternative mechanisms of 
clinical resistance need to be sought. 
Some BRCA1 deficient tumors were found to overexpress RAD51, which might lead to partial 
restoration of repair capacity. A recent in vitro study investigated the potential resistance 
mechanism(s) of the combination of temozolomide and veliparib. Colorectal carcinoma HCT116 
cells resistant to this drug combination (HCT116R) had increased expression of the HR genes 
RAD51, FANCA, FANCG, BLM, BRCA1, and BRCA2. Recently, Cardnell et al reported, using 
small cell lung cancer (SCLC) preclinical models, the correlation of PARPi sensitivity and a 17 
DNA damage repair protein panel, including but not limited to RAD51 and 53BP1.25 The SCLC 
cell lines with higher expression of the DNA repair protein panel, measured by reverse phase 
protein array (RPPA)26, were more sensitive to PARP inhibition. Conversely, cell lines with a 
relatively higher expression of PI3K pathway proteins demonstrated a strong inverse correlation 
with PARPi sensitivity. These data suggest clinical resistance to PARPi may develop through 
multiple mechanisms independent of revertant BRCA1 or 2 mutation, such as loss of 53BP1 or 
increased protein expression of NHEJ or PI3K pathway. 25  
We examined potential predictive biomarkers to PARPi-based therapy in our phase 1 study of 
olaparib and carboplatin (08-C-0092/ NCT00647062, Figure 6)8. Our exploratory proteomic 
analysis of paired tumor biopsies indicated increased pretreatment FOXO3a expression was 
significantly related to a longer duration of response (> 6 months; p=0.0002, R2=0.94) 
  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Figure 6. The relationship between pretreatment biopsy protein expression and response 
duration8. A cut off of R2=0.8 was used to select the top potential predictive biomarkers.  A-H:  8 
proteins were statistically significantly correlated with PFS >6 months.  I:  pS209-eIF4E and FOXO3a 
were isolated as drivers for the PFS outcome (p<0.001, R2=0.94, RMSE=2.41). RPPAs were analyzed for 
correlations between pretreatment protein levels and duration of response with a two tailed ANOVA 
analysis and controlled for false discovery rate of 0.05.  RPPA: reverse phase protein microarray. RMSE: 
root mean square error. 
IHC confirmed the finding and demonstrated a significant difference in expression of FOXO3a 
between the stromal and tumor cells, confirming the FOXO3a signal came from the tumor cells 
(Figure 7C). Further, the IHC FOXO3a positive cells were significantly reduced after 1 cycle of 
treatment in the responders and the number of FOXO3a+ cells/HPF correlated with clinical 
response (Figure 7A and B).  
 
 
 
Figure 7. Validation of FOXO3a using immunohistochemistry.8 A.  Example paired FOXO3a 
stained biopsy set (400x magnification). Left: pretreatment biopsy; Right: after cycle 1. Arrowheads: 
negatively stained nuclei, note similar intensity in pre and post-C1 samples; short arrows: tumor cells 
with positively stained nuclei; long arrow: tumor cell with positively stained cytosol. B.  FOXO3a-
positive tumor cell nuclei are reduced after one cycle of treatment. Paired samples sets for 5 patients were 
available for enumeration. The mean of FOXO3a positive cells at baseline: 427.73 (range 181-758, SD 
198.96, 95% CI 229.77-625.69) v. 112 (range 19-358, SD 90.89, 95% CI 20.78-202.58)], p<0.0001. C. 
Tumor cells are the source of the FOXO3a signal (p<0.001). Tumor and stromal cells with positively 
stained nuclei were counted per 5 HPF. The median of IHC results between tumor and stromal cells were 
compared using a two-tailed paired Student t-test.   

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
FOXO3a was originally reported as a tumor suppressor gene associated with cell cycle 
regulation through Fas-mediated death.27 Multiple preclinical studies have shown that FOXO3a 
promotes phosphorylation of ATM at Ser1981 and prompts the ATM–Chk2–p53-mediated 
apoptotic program following DNA damage.28,29  We will examine the pretreatment FOXO3a 
expression in this study, to examine its behavior as a potential biomarker in response to 
subsequent PARPi-based therapy after first PARPi exposure.  
Another possible resistance mechanism to PARPi was reported by Dr. Nussenzweig’s group, 
Laboratory of Genome Integrity/CCR and others.30-33 His laboratory showed 53BP1 inhibits HR 
repair in BRCA1-deficient cells; whereas, loss of 53BP1 increased HR capacity, and rescued 
RAD51 focus formation after radiation treatment.31 Breast cancers arising in gBRCA1m carriers 
frequently show low levels of 53BP1 expression.30 This finding may explain why the frequency 
and duration of response to PARPi is overall less in breast cancers than in ovarian cancer. 
Consistent with this, 53BP1 was found to be lost in a fraction of BRCA1-deficient mouse 
mammary tumors that acquired PARPi resistance in vivo.33 To further define other resistance 
mechanisms related to loss of 53BP1, Dr. Nussenzweig and his colleagues identified and 
recently published the interaction of 53BP1 and PTIP, the Pax2 transactivation domain 
interaction protein.32  His group has shown that PTIP is a regulator of 53BP1 at DNA damage 
sites.34 PTIP promotes genome instability in BRCA1-knockout lymphocytes by inhibiting double 
strand DNA break (DSB) resection. PTIP recruitment to DSBs was reported to be 53BP1 and 
ATM independent.35,36 Callen et al32 showed loss of PTIP reverses the HR defect in BRCA1-
knockout B cells as shown by reaccumulation of RAD51 foci, and subsequent resection of DSB. 
There has yet been no investigation of the role of PTIP in clinical PARPi resistance, thus, 
making it important to define the expression of PTIP in PARPi sensitive and resistance clinical 
samples. We will collaborate with Dr. Nussenzweig to investigate these molecular events in our 
patients. 
Lastly, Patel et al reported that a key mechanism of PARP-1 is to maintain a brake on NHEJ.  
They showed that PARPi induced phosphorylation of DNA-PK and stimulated error-prone 
NHEJ selectively in HR-deficient cells.19 Inhibition or downregulation of Ku80 or DNA-PK 
increased resistance to PARPi in PEO1 ovarian cancer and CAPAN1 pancreatic cancer cells, 
both BRCA2-deficient.19 Therefore, resistance to PARPi can be acquired from altered expression 
of key regulatory proteins of the complex HR pathway. This mechanism has not been examined 
in clinical samples.   
A key to progress is understanding this difference and subsequent identification, development 
and validation of biomarkers to identify the subgroup of patients who become clinically resistant 
to platinums and/or PARPi. Hence, it is necessary to elucidate PARPi resistance mechanisms in 
clinical samples, and to identify and investigate potential biomarkers to help define susceptibility 
of gBRCAm ovarian cancer patients to re-exposure to PARPi. PARPi after PARPi (PAP) therapy 
will provide initial findings with which to lead to randomized trials examining the role of repeat 
PARPi therapy in patients with gBRCAm, and with tissue and blood acquisition, will allow 
further characterization of resistance pathways and development of potential biomarkers. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
2.4 
RATIONALE 
This phase 2 pilot study will test our hypothesis that ovarian cancer patients with gBRCAm will 
have a second clinical response to a second, highly potent, PARPi after sustaining progressive 
disease while receiving a first PARPi. Our scientific rationale is based on the following:  
1) gBRCAm carriers’ well-recognized clinical behaviors: gBRCAm carriers demonstrate 
repeated therapeutic susceptibility to DNA damaging agents, especially platinums, even if they 
have progressed on a similar, prior (platinum-based) regimen.  
2) BMN 673 (talazoparib) is a novel, potent PARP inhibitor, which has excellent oral 
bioavailability. BMN 673 (talazoparib) has yielded greater anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo 
at lower concentrations than earlier generation PARPi.   
3) Olaparib is now being tested in phase III maintenance registration trials for gBRCAm-
associated ovarian cancer at the first and subsequent remission (2 studies; Study of OLaparib in 
Ovarian cancer [SOLO] 1 and SOLO2). Both niraparib and rucaparib are being tested in phase 
III trials for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive high grade serous ovarian cancer (ARIEL 
and NOVA). These women will need subsequent therapeutic opportunities and have already 
been clamoring for second access to a PARPi. Thus, the PARP inhibitor-treated exposed 
gBRCAm patient community is now emerging as a new patient population with unmet 
therapeutic needs. Reintroduction of a PARPi in this setting has not been studied, and will be an 
important question to guide patient- and resource-efficient use of this important new class of 
drug. 
3 
PATIENT SELECTION 
3.1 
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA  
3.1.1 Recurrent, and/or metastatic germline BRCA 1/2 mutation-associated ovarian cancer, 
with progression on a PARP inhibitor monotherapy after attaining a response to that 
PARPi  (CR, PR, or SD≥4mo)   
3.1.1.1 Progression should have occurred within the immediate prior 2 months of the time of 
screening visit, with no intervening anti-cancer therapy.  
3.1.2 Patients must be at least 4 weeks from the last dose of prior PARP inhibitor. 
3.1.3 All patients must have at least one lesion deemed safe to biopsy and be willing to 
undergo mandatory baseline biopsy.  It is preferred that this lesion be a lesion that 
progressed or arose while on the prior PARP therapy. 
3.1.4 Histopathologic diagnosis of ovarian cancer (including primary peritoneal and fallopian 
tube cancers) must be confirmed in the Laboratory of Pathology, NCI.   
3.1.5 Age ≥18 years.   
3.1.6 ECOG performance status ≤2 (Karnofsky ≥60%, see Appendix A, Section 16.1). 
3.1.7 Patients must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below: 
− 
absolute neutrophil count 
≥1,500/mcL 
− 
platelets 
≥100,000/mcL 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
− 
total bilirubin 
≤ 1.5X upper limit of normal, unless known Gilbert’s 
syndrome 
− 
AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) 
≤3 × institutional upper limit of normal 
− 
creatinine 
< 1.5 X upper limit of normal  
OR 
− 
measured creatinine clearance 
>60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for patients with serum 
creatinine levels > 1.5 x upper limit of normal. 
− 
hemoglobin 
 
≥ 10 mg/dL (in the absence of transfusion within 24 hours prior to 
dosing).   
3.1.8 All patients must have measurable disease by RECIST v1.1.  
3.1.9 Use of raloxifene for bone health is allowed.  
3.1.10 Patients must be at least 1 week from the last dose of complementary or alternative 
medications.    
3.1.11 Patients who have had major surgery must be fully recovered and ≥4 weeks post-
operative prior to enrolling on study. 
3.1.12 Women of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or 
barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study 
participation, and for at least three months following the last dose of experimental 
therapy and must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to the 
start of the study. 
3.1.13 Patient must be able to swallow pills. 
3.1.14 Integral biomarkers:  all patients who are eligible for the study due to a history of positive 
BRCA1/2 mutation must provide documented evidence of their deleterious germline 
mutation status, obtained in a CLIA-certified laboratory, including but not limited to 
Myriad Genetics prior to study enrollment. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) of 
BRCA1/2 and BRCA1/2 somatic mutations are not considered deleterious germline 
BRCA1/2 mutations. Due to the long acceptance of BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation 
testing through Myriad, Myriad results will be acceptable.  If testing for BRCA 1 and 
BRCA 2 mutation is done by other organizations, a genetic consultation report from a 
qualified medical professional confirming that the laboratory results showed a recognized 
germ line deleterious BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutation or deleterious BRCA 1 
rearrangement is required. 
3.1.15 Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. 
3.2 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA 
3.2.1 Patients who have had prior BMN 673 (talazoparib) therapy. 
3.2.2 Patients with known brain metastases diagnosed within 1 year will be excluded from this 
clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive 
neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
adverse events. Exception: patients with brain metastases diagnosed greater than 1 year 
prior to study entry may be considered if they received sterilizing therapy to the CNS 
(resection or radiation) and have been CNS progression-free for the 1-year period.  
3.2.3 Lack of recovery of prior cancer therapy-related adverse events to Grade ≤1 (NCI 
CTCAE v4.03; except alopecia). Stable persistent grade 2 peripheral neuropathy may be 
allowed as determined on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the PI. Patients with 
platinum-related grade 2 or greater hypomagnesemia (on replacement) will be eligible.   
3.2.4 Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive 
heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, clinically significant GI 
bleeding or hemoptysis within 28 days prior to the start of the study, or psychiatric 
illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.   
3.2.5 Patients with active infection will not be eligible, but may become eligible once infection 
has resolved and they are at least 7 days from completion of antibiotics. 
3.2.6 Another previous or current invasive malignancy within the last 2 years, with the 
exception of curatively treated stage Ia cervical carcinoma, or resected stage Ia 
endometrial cancer, and noninvasive nonmelanoma skin cancers. 
3.2.7 HIV-positive patients on combination antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of the 
potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with BMN 673 (talazoparib).  HIV- positive 
patients who are not on cART and have CD4 counts > 500 are eligible.  
3.2.8 History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic 
composition to BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
3.2.9 Patients who are receiving any other investigational or commercial agents with the intent 
to treat the malignancy. 
3.2.10 Patients with gastrointestinal conditions that might predispose for drug intolerability or 
poor drug absorption. 
3.2.11 Use of nasogastric or G-tube administration. 
 
3.3 
INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES 
Women of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this trial. 
4 
REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
Authorized staff must register an eligible candidate with NCI Central Registration Office 37 
within 24 hours of signing consent.  A registration Eligibility Checklist from the web site 
(http://home.ccr.cancer.gov/intra/eligibility/welcome.htm) must be completed and sent via 
encrypted email to:  NCI Central Registration Office (HOIS) <ncicentralregistration-
l@mail.nih.gov>.  After confirmation of eligibility at Central Registration Office, CRO staff will 
call pharmacy to advise them of the acceptance of the patient on the protocol prior to the release 
of any investigational agents. Verification of Registration will be forwarded electronically via e-
mail to the research team. A recorder is available during non-working hours.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
5 
TREATMENT PLAN 
This is an open label, single arm, non-randomized phase II trial to examine activity of BMN 673 
(talazoparib) in patients with gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancers who have had prior PARPi 
therapy. Patients will be evaluated at baseline and prior to each cycle by history and physical 
examination (H&P; only pretreatment full H&P must be noted in the research record), and every 
two cycles by imaging studies (CT scans). Reassessment noninvasive imaging to document 
response will be performed every 2 cycles (~8 wks). See Section 11 for study calendar. 
5.1 
SCREENING EVALUATION 
• 
Complete history and physical examination are required prior to initiation of study.  They 
will include but are not limited to:  height, weight, and ECOG performance score, 
documentation of 1) mutation status and family history where appropriate; 2) 
measurable/evaluable disease, 3) narcotic use and pain assessment (if applicable), 4) 
medication history, and 5) prior therapies (hormonal, surgical, radio therapeutic, and 
cytotoxic).   
• 
Confirmation of Diagnosis in NCI Laboratory of Pathology. 
• 
Laboratory studies (See Section 11 for study calendar) will be done within 1 week of 
consent.  CBC with differential and platelet count must be repeated the day of consent. 
• 
Serum chemistry - Bilirubin, hemoglobin, AST, ALT, creatinine or creatinine clearance. 
• 
Serum beta-hCG or urine pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential. 
5.2 
BASELINE EVALUATION 
• 
Baseline history, physical examination, and documentation of concomitant medications 
are to be conducted within 1 week of consent.  
• 
Laboratory studies (See Section 11 for study calendar) will be done within 1 week of 
consent.  CBC with differential and platelet count must be repeated the day of consent. 
• 
On-study tumor documentation may be done within 17 days prior to consent.   
• 
Treatment must begin within 1 week after consent, allowing for the required biopsies and 
research samples to be obtained.  If a patient is coming off another intramural study 
where a biopsy on post-progression is optional, and she agrees to undergo this optional 
biopsy on that study, she may allow extra cores to be taken to fulfill the on-study biopsy 
requirements of this study and avoid the risks of back-to-back tissue acquisition. The 
patient may be off-treatment and on follow-up on another therapeutic trial.  
5.3 
AGENT ADMINISTRATION 
• Patients will receive oral BMN 673 (talazoparib) at the RP2D of 1mg/day daily for 28-
day cycles, until progressive disease, limiting toxicity, intercurrent medical issues, or 
patient withdrawal of consent.  
• Treatment will be administered on an outpatient basis.  BMN 673 (talazoparib) can be 
administered with and without a meal.  Reported adverse events and potential risks are 
described in Section 7.3.1. Appropriate dose modifications are described in Section 6.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
No investigational or commercial agents or therapies other than those described below 
may be administered with the intent to treat the patient's malignancy. 
5.3.1 CCR Self-Administered Study Drugs Policy 
All oral self-administered investigational agents will be properly accounted for, handled, and 
disposed in accordance with existing federal regulations and principles of Good Clinical 
Practice. All oral study drugs will be recorded in patient diaries (See Appendix D, Section 16.4). 
This will be used as a memory aide for subjects. A clinical research team maintains the primary 
source record. 
5.4 
GENERAL CONCOMITANT MEDICATION AND SUPPORTIVE CARE GUIDELINES 
Based on in vitro data (2013 IB), BMN 673 (talazoparib) is not likely to inhibit metabolism via 
human cytochrome P450 (CYP 450) enzymes. The case report form will capture the concurrent 
use of all other drugs, over-the-counter medications, or alternative therapies due to potential 
interaction with other concomitantly administered drugs.  
5.4.1 Nausea/Vomiting  
Anti-emetics will not be administered routinely prior to BMN 673 (talazoparib). However, if a 
patient develops nausea/vomiting, anti-emetics such as but not limited to prochlorperazine, 
metoclopramide, 5-HT3 antagonists may be given. In addition, if a patient develops nausea 
and/or vomiting that is grade 2 or greater, anti-emetics may be instituted prophylactically at the 
discretion of the investigator. Nausea and vomiting will be considered refractory if it does not 
resolve to≤ grade 1 with treatment with a combination of at least 2 of the anti-emetics within 24 
hours.  
5.4.2 Diarrhea  
If diarrhea develops and does not have an identifiable cause other than study drug administration, 
anti-diarrheals such as Lomotil (diphenoxylate HCl 2.5 mg + atropine sulfate 0.025 mg/tablet) 
dosed according to package insert or loperamide 4 mg p.o. after the first unformed stool with 2 
mg p.o. with every 2 hours as long as unformed stools continue (4 mg every 4 hours while 
asleep). No more than 16 mg of loperamide should be taken during a 24-hour period). This 
regimen can be repeated for each diarrheal episode. Diarrhea will be considered refractory if it 
does not resolve within 24 hours ≤ to Grade 2 with the above regimen (16 mg, or less if there is 
resolution of the symptoms, of loperamide in a 24-hour period). If the patient develops blood or 
mucus in the stool, dehydration, or hemodynamic instability, or fever along with the diarrhea, 
anti-diarrheals will be discontinued and the patient will be treated with IV fluids and antibiotics 
as medically indicated.  
5.4.3 Hematologic toxicity 
See Section 6.1.1 for details. 
 
5.5 
DURATION OF THERAPY 
Prior to documenting removal from protocol therapy, effort must be made to have all subjects 
complete a safety visit approximately 30 days following the last dose of study therapy. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
In the absence of treatment delays due to adverse event(s), treatment may continue until one of 
the following criteria applies: 
• 
Disease progression, 
• 
Intercurrent illness that prevents further administration of treatment, 
• 
Unacceptable adverse event(s), 
• 
Patient decides to withdraw from the study, or 
• 
General or specific changes in the patient's condition render the patient unacceptable 
for further treatment in the judgment of the investigator. 
• 
Positive pregnancy test 
5.6 
DURATION OF FOLLOW UP 
PFS2 (the time between initiation of BMN 673 (talazoparib) and disease progression on a 
subsequent therapy) will be obtained during follow-up. For this, participants will be followed for 
3 years by clinic visit or by phone until death or progression on subsequent therapy after removal 
from study treatment, whichever occurs first. Participants’ vital status will be followed every 6 
months either at a scheduled clinic visit or by phone following removal from the study treatment. 
Date and cause of death should be provided for participants who become deceased within the 3-
year interval following removal from the study treatment. 
All AEs, including clinically significant abnormal findings on laboratory evaluations, regardless 
of severity, will be followed until satisfactory resolution. AEs will be reported up to 30 days 
following the last dose of study drug.   
Participants removed from study treatment for unacceptable adverse events will be followed until 
resolution or stabilization of the adverse event to grade 1 or better, by a monthly scheduled clinic 
visit or by phone.  
5.7 
OFF-STUDY PROCEDURE 
Authorized staff must notify Central Registration Office (CRO) when a subject is taken off-
study. An off-study form from the web site 
(http://home.ccr.cancer.gov/intra/eligibility/welcome.htm) main page must be completed and 
sent via encrypted email to:  NCI Central Registration Office (HOIS) ncicentralregistration-
l@mail.nih.gov. 
6 
DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS 
Table 6. Dose Levels of BMN 673 (Talazoparib) 
Dose Level (DL) 
BMN 673 (talazoparib), oral, once daily  
Starting dose, DL1 
1000mcg (1mg) 
DL-1 
750mcg (0.75mg) 
DL-2 
500mcg (0.5mg) 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
DL-3 
250mcg (0.25mg) 
 
Table 7. Treatment modifications of BMN 673 (Talazoparib) for Drug-related hematologic 
toxicities*   
 
Grade Occurrence 
Immediate Action 
Resumption of Therapy 
1 
All 
None 
no interruption 
2 
All 
 
None 
 
No interruption, with the exception of 
thrombocytopenia. In the case of the first 
thrombocytopenia, therapy will resume at the 
same dose level once platelet counts > 
100,000/L. In the case of recurrent grade 2 
thrombocytopenia, therapy will resume at the 
next lower dose level if toxicities have 
resolved to platelet counts > 100,000/L. 
3 
1st** 
Hold therapy until Grade 
≤ 2 
Initiate appropriate medical therapy and, with 
the exception of thrombocytopenia, reinitiate 
BMN 673 (talazoparib) at the same dose level 
if toxicities have resolved to Grade 2 or less. 
In the case of thrombocytopenia, therapy will  
resume at the next lower dose level once 
platelet counts > 100,000/L. 
2nd** 
Hold therapy until Grade 
≤ 2 
Initiate appropriate medical therapy and, with 
the exception of thrombocytopenia, reduce to 
the next lower dose level if toxicities have 
resolved to Grade 2 or less. 
In the case of thrombocytopenia, therapy will 
resume at the next lower dose level once 
platelet counts ≥ 100,000/L.  
4 
1st** 
Hold therapy until Grade 
≤ 2 
 
Initiate appropriate medical therapy and, with 
the exception of thrombocytopenia, reduce to 
the next lower dose level prior to re-initiation 
of BMN 673 (talazoparib) if toxicities have 
resolved to Grade 2 or less.  
In the case of thrombocytopenia, therapy will 
resume at the next lower dose level once 
platelet counts ≥ 100,000/L within the 3-week 
period. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
2nd 
 
Hold therapy until Grade 
≤ 2 
Terminate therapy BMN 673 (talazoparib). 
Follow patient until resolution/stabilization of 
toxicity. 
 
*For adverse events that are at least possibly, probably, or definitely attributable to BMN 
673 (talazoparib) alone  
**If no resolution occurs within the 3-week period, the study drug will be discontinued. 
  
6.1.1 Hematologic Toxicity   
• Hold BMN 673 (talazoparib) until hematologic toxicities resolve to grade 2 or better 
prior to starting the next cycle. In the case of thrombocytopenia, therapy will resume once 
platelet counts > 100,000/L.  Treatment may be delayed for a maximum of 3 weeks after 
holding the treatment for toxicities that develop and do not resolve as defined above 
(exemptions: lymphopenia, or leukopenia in the absence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia). 
• Beyond three weeks, the patient will not receive further therapy on this protocol.  They 
will be taken off treatment, and will be followed for resolution of toxicities or bone 
marrow biopsies to evaluate the other causes of bone marrow suppression such as 
myelodysplastic syndrome on treatment follow up period.  
• Weekly blood counts will be obtained during the first cycle, and then at the start of each 
cycle. If any weekly evaluation demonstrates grade ≥ 2 neutropenia or 
thrombocytopenia, a repeat hematology assessment will be obtained 2-5 days later. 
6.1.1.1 Neutropenia  
• Growth factors to prevent neutropenia will not be administered prophylactically, but can 
be used during a drug hold to assist the recovery.   
• Filgrastim/PEG filgrastim will be used only if the patient has neutropenia with sepsis for 
the purpose of facilitating recovery of the neutropenic sepsis38.  
6.1.1.2 Thrombocytopenia 
• Thrombocytopenia will be treated conservatively. In the absence of bleeding, or a 
necessary invasive procedure, platelet transfusions should be given for a platelet count ≤
10,000/mm3.  
• If invasive procedure(s) is (are) planned, or the patient develops bleeding, platelet 
transfusions should be administered in accordance with the standard of practice, usually 
maintaining a platelet count above 50,000/mm3. 
• In the case of Grade 1 or the first Grade 2 thrombocytopenia, therapy will resume at the 
same dose level once platelet counts > 100,000/L. 
• In the case of recurrent Grade 2 or Grade 3 or Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, therapy will 
resume at the next lower dose level once platelet counts ≥ 100,000/L. 
6.1.1.3 Anemia 
• Symptomatic anemia should be treated with red blood cell transfusion and is 
recommended if the hemoglobin falls below 8 g/dL or the patient is symptomatic.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
• The initiation of erythropoietic therapy for the management of chemotherapy-induced 
anemia follows the American Society of Hematology/ASCO clinical practice guidelines 
(http://www.asco.org). 
6.1.2 Non-hematologic Toxicity 
Grade 3-4 Drug-related non-hematologic toxicities: Doses of BMN 673 (talazoparib) will be held 
until toxicities recover to Grade 1 or less prior to re-initiating treatment at the next lower dose 
level. Dose modifications for nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea will be made only if they are 
refractory to treatment. Asymptomatic electrolyte abnormalities will not require dose reduction if 
resolution to Grade 1 or less is documented within 72 hours. 
 
6.1.2.1 Nausea/Vomiting  
See Section 5.4.1  
 
6.1.2.2 Diarrhea  
See Section 5.4.2 
 
6.1.2.3 The patient will be removed from the study if grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity 
recurs (see below for exemptions) after resumption of study drug at the lower dose 
level.  Exemptions: 
• Asymptomatic hyperuricemia/hypouricemia/hypophosphatemia/hyponatremia with 
optimal repletion 
• Asymptomatic hypomagnesemia with optimal repletion  
• Asymptomatic hypocalcemia, or hypokalemia with optimal repletion 
 
However, asymptomatic grade 4 hypokalemia not corrected to grade 1 or 0 within 48 hours 
despite optimal repletion will result in discontinuation of study drug.  
 
Subsequent grade 3 asymptomatic electrolytes toxicities that could be controlled with standard 
medications will not have dose reduction. However, asymptomatic grade 3 hypokalemia not 
corrected to grade 1 or 0 within 48 hours despite optimal repletion will result in dose reduction. 
 
7 
SAFETY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS/DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING 
PLAN 
7.1 
DEFINITIONS 
7.1.1 Adverse Event 
An adverse event is defined as any reaction, side effect, or untoward event that occurs during the 
course of the clinical trial associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not the event 
is considered related to the treatment or clinically significant. For this study, AEs will include 
events reported by the patient, as well as clinically significant abnormal findings on physical 
examination or laboratory evaluation. A new illness, symptom, sign or clinically significant 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
laboratory abnormality or worsening of a pre-existing condition or abnormality is considered an 
AE.  All AEs must be recorded on the AE case report form unless otherwise noted above. 
All AEs, including clinically significant abnormal findings on laboratory evaluations, regardless 
of severity, will be followed until return to baseline or stabilization of event. Serious adverse 
events that occur more than 30 days after the last administration of investigational 
agent/intervention and have an attribution of at least possibly related to the agent/intervention 
should be recorded and reported as per sections 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, and 7.7. 
An abnormal laboratory value will be considered an AE if the laboratory abnormality is 
characterized by any of the following: 
• 
Results in discontinuation from the study 
• 
Is associated with clinical signs or symptoms  
• 
Requires treatment or any other therapeutic intervention 
• 
Is associated with death or another serious adverse event, including hospitalization.  
• 
Is judged by the Investigator to be of significant clinical impact 
• 
If any abnormal laboratory result is considered clinically significant, the investigator will 
provide details about the action taken with respect to the test drug and about the patient’s 
outcome. 
7.1.2 Suspected adverse reaction 
Suspected adverse reaction means any adverse event for which there is a reasonable possibility 
that the drug caused the adverse event. For the purposes of IND safety reporting, ‘reasonable 
possibility’ means there is evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the drug and the 
adverse event. A suspected adverse reaction implies a lesser degree of certainty about causality 
than adverse reaction, which means any adverse event caused by a drug. 
7.1.3 Unexpected adverse reaction 
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered “unexpected” if it is not listed in 
the investigator brochure or is not listed at the specificity or severity that has been observed; or, 
if an investigator brochure is not required or available, is not consistent with the risk information 
described in the general investigational plan or elsewhere in the current application. 
"Unexpected” also refers to adverse events or suspected adverse reactions that are mentioned in 
the investigator brochure as occurring with a class of drugs or as anticipated from the 
pharmacological properties of the drug, but are not specifically mentioned as occurring with the 
particular drug under investigation. 
7.1.4 Serious  
An Unanticipated Problem or Protocol Deviation is serious if it meets the definition of a Serious 
Adverse Event or if it compromises the safety, welfare or rights of subjects or others. 
7.1.5 Serious Adverse Event 
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered serious if in the view of the 
investigator or the sponsor, it results in any of the following: 
• 
Death, 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
• 
A life-threatening adverse drug experience 
• 
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization 
• 
Persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct 
normal life functions 
• 
A congenital anomaly/birth defect. 
• 
Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require 
hospitalization may be considered a serious adverse drug experience when, based upon 
appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the patient or subject and may require 
medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition. 
7.1.6 Disability 
 A substantial disruption of a person’s ability to conduct normal life functions. 
7.1.7 Life-threatening adverse drug experience 
Any adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that places the patient or subject, in the view of 
the investigator or sponsor, at immediate risk of death from the reaction as it occurred, i.e., it 
does not include a reaction that had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death. 
7.1.8 Protocol Deviation (NIH Definition) 
Any change, divergence, or departure from the IRB-approved research protocol.   
7.1.9 Non-compliance (NIH Definition) 
The failure to comply with applicable NIH Human Research Protections Program (HRPP) 
policies, IRB requirements, or regulatory requirements for the protection of human research 
subjects. 
7.1.10 Unanticipated Problem 
Any incident, experience, or outcome that: 
•  Is unexpected in terms of nature, severity, or frequency in relation to  
(a) the research risks that are described in the IRB-approved research protocol and 
informed consent document; Investigator’s Brochure or other study documents, and 
(b) the characteristics of the subject population being studied; AND 
• Is related or possibly related to participation in the research; AND 
• Suggests that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm (including 
physical, psychological, economic, or social harm) than was previously known or 
recognized. 
 
7.2 
ADVERSE EVENTS:  LIST AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS  
Adverse event (AE) monitoring and reporting is a routine part of every clinical trial.  The 
following list of AEs (Section 7.3) and the characteristics of an observed AE (Section 7.4) will 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
determine whether the event requires expedited reporting (via CTEP-AERS) in addition to 
routine reporting. 
7.3 
COMPREHENSIVE ADVERSE EVENTS AND POTENTIAL RISKS LIST (CAEPR) 
The Comprehensive Adverse Event and Potential Risks list (CAEPR) provides a single list of 
reported and/or potential adverse events (AE) associated with an agent using a uniform 
presentation of events by body system.  In addition to the comprehensive list, a subset of AEs, 
the Specific Protocol Exceptions to Expedited Reporting (SPEER), appears in a separate column 
and is identified with bold and italicized text.  The SPEER is a list of events that are protocol-
specific exceptions to expedited reporting to NCI via CTEP-AERS (except as noted below).  
Refer to the 'CTEP, NCI Guidelines: Adverse Event Reporting Requirements' 
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/default.htm#adverse_events_adeers for further 
clarification. Also refer to the Investigator’s Brochure for frequency data. 
NOTE:  The highest grade currently reported is noted in parentheses next to the AE in the 
SPEER.  Report ONLY AEs higher than this grade expeditiously via CTEP-AERS.  If this 
CAEPR is part of a combination protocol using multiple investigational agents and has an AE 
listed on different SPEERs, use the lower of the grades to determine if expedited reporting is 
required. 
7.3.1 CAEPRs for CTEP IND Agent: BMN 673 (Talazoparib) (NSC 771561) 
Comprehensive Adverse Events and Potential Risks list (CAEPR) 
for 
BMN 673 (talazoparib, NSC 771561) 
The Comprehensive Adverse Event and Potential Risks list (CAEPR) provides a single list of 
reported and/or potential adverse events (AE) associated with an agent using a uniform 
presentation of events by body system. In addition to the comprehensive list, a subset, the 
Specific Protocol Exceptions to Expedited Reporting (SPEER), appears in a separate column and 
is identified with bold and italicized text. This subset of AEs (SPEER) is a list of events that are 
protocol specific exceptions to expedited reporting to NCI via AdEERS (except as noted below).  
Refer to the 'CTEP, NCI Guidelines: Adverse Event Reporting Requirements' 
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/aeguidelines.pdf for 
further clarification. Frequency is provided based on 219 patients. Below is the CAEPR for 
BMN 673 (talazoparib). 
NOTE: Report AEs on the SPEER ONLY IF they exceed the grade noted in parentheses next to 
the AE in the SPEER.  If this CAEPR is part of a combination protocol using multiple 
investigational agents and has an AE listed on different SPEERs, use the lower of the grades to 
determine if expedited reporting is required. 
Version 2.0, July 24, 20151 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
 
 Adverse Events with Possible  
 Relationship to BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
 (CTCAE 4.0 Term) 
[n= 219] 
 
 
 Specific Protocol Exceptions to 
Expedited Reporting (SPEER) 
Likely (>20%) 
Less Likely (<=20%) 
Rare but Serious (<3%)  
 
BLOOD AND LYMPHATIC SYSTEM DISORDERS 
  
 
Anemia 
 
 Anemia (Gr 2) 
 
 
Febrile neutropenia 
  
GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS 
  
 
Constipation 
 
 Constipation (Gr 2) 
 
Diarrhea 
 
 Diarrhea (Gr 2) 
Nausea 
 
 
 Nausea (Gr 2) 
 
Vomiting 
 
  
GENERAL DISORDERS AND ADMINISTRATION SITE CONDITIONS 
  
Fatigue 
 
 
 Fatigue (Gr 2) 
INVESTIGATIONS 
  
 
Neutrophil count decreased 
 
 Neutrophil count decreased (Gr 2) 
 
Platelet count decreased 
 
 Platelet count decreased (Gr 2) 
NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS 
  
 
Dizziness 
 
  
SKIN AND SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE DISORDERS 
  
 
Alopecia 
 
  
1This table will be updated as the toxicity profile of the agent is revised. Updates will be distributed to all Principal 
Investigators at the time of revision. The current version can be obtained by contacting PIO@CTEP.NCI.NIH.GOV. 
Your name, the name of the investigator, the protocol and the agent should be included in the e-mail. 
Adverse Events reported on BMN 673 (talazoparib) trials, but for which there is insufficient evidence to 
suggest that there was a reasonable possibility that BMN 673 (talazoparib) caused the adverse events. 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
CARDIAC DISORDERS - Atrial flutter 
GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS - Abdominal pain; Flatulence; Toothache 
GENERAL DISORDERS AND ADMINISTRATION SITE CONDITIONS - Edema limbs; Fever 
INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS - Lung infection; Sepsis 
INVESTIGATIONS - Alanine aminotransferase increased; Aspartate aminotransferase increased; White blood cell 
decreased 
METABOLISM AND NUTRITION DISORDERS - Anorexia; Hypokalemia 
MUSCULOSKELETAL AND CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISORDERS - Arthralgia; Back pain; Musculoskeletal 
and connective tissue disorder - Other (muscle cramps); Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder - Other 
(muscle spasm); Pain in extremity 
NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS - Headache; Peripheral sensory neuropathy 
PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS - Anxiety 
RESPIRATORY, THORACIC, AND MEDIASTINAL DISORDERS - Cough; Dyspnea; Pleural effusion 
SKIN AND SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE DISORDERS - Rash maculo-papular 
 
 
Note: BMN 673 (talazoparib) in combination with other agents could cause an exacerbation of any adverse event 
currently known to be caused by the other agent, or the combination may result in events never previously 
associated with either agent. 
 
7.4 
ADVERSE EVENT CHARACTERISTICS  
• CTCAE term (AE description) and grade:  The descriptions and grading scales found 
in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 
4.0 will be utilized for AE reporting.  All appropriate treatment areas should have access 
to a copy of the CTCAE version 4.0.  A copy of the CTCAE version 4.0 can be 
downloaded from the CTEP web site 
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. 
 
• For expedited reporting purposes only:   
- 
AEs for the agent that are bold and italicized in the CAEPR (i.e., those listed in the 
SPEER column, Section 7.3.1) should be reported through CTEP-AERS only if the 
grade is above the grade provided in the SPEER. 
- 
Other AEs for the protocol that do not require expedited reporting are outlined in 
Section 7.6. 
• Attribution of the AE: 
- 
Definite – The AE is clearly related to the study treatment. 
- 
Probable – The AE is likely related to the study treatment. 
- 
Possible – The AE may be related to the study treatment. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
- 
Unlikely – The AE is doubtfully related to the study treatment. 
- 
Unrelated – The AE is clearly NOT related to the study treatment. 
7.5 
EXPEDITED ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING TO CTEP 
7.5.1 Expedited AE reporting for this study must use CTEP-AERS (CTEP Adverse Event 
Reporting System), accessed via the CTEP Web site (http://ctep.cancer.gov).  The 
reporting procedures to be followed are presented in the “NCI Guidelines for 
Investigators: Adverse Event Reporting Requirements for DCTD (CTEP and CIP) and 
DCP INDs and IDEs” which can be downloaded from the CTEP Web site 
(http://ctep.cancer.gov).  These requirements are briefly outlined in the tables below 
(Section 7.5.2). 
In the rare occurrence when Internet connectivity is lost, a 24-hour notification is to be 
made to CTEP by telephone at 301-897-7497.  Once Internet connectivity is restored, the 
24-hour notification phoned in must be entered electronically into CTEP-AERS by the 
original submitter at the site. 
7.5.2 Expedited Reporting Guidelines 
Use the NCI protocol number and the protocol-specific patient ID assigned during trial 
registration on all reports. 
Note:  A death on study requires both routine and expedited reporting regardless of 
causality, unless as noted below.  Attribution to treatment or other cause must be 
provided. 
Death due to progressive disease should be reported as Grade 5 “Neoplasms benign, 
malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) - Other (Progressive Disease)” 
under the system organ class (SOC) of the same name.  Evidence that the death was a 
manifestation of underlying disease (e.g., radiological changes suggesting tumor growth 
or progression: clinical deterioration associated with a disease process) should be 
submitted.  
Phase 1 and Early Phase 2 Studies:  Expedited Reporting Requirements for Adverse 
Events that Occur on Studies under an IND/IDE within 30 Days of the Last Administration 
of the Investigational Agent/Intervention 1, 2 
FDA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS (21 CFR Part 312) 
NOTE:  Investigators MUST immediately report to the sponsor (NCI) ANY Serious Adverse Events, whether or not 
they are considered related to the investigational agent(s)/intervention (21 CFR 312.64) 
An adverse event is considered serious if it results in ANY of the following outcomes:   
1) 
Death 
2) 
A life-threatening adverse event  
3) 
An adverse event that results in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for ≥ 24 
hours  
4) 
A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions  
5) 
A congenital anomaly/birth defect.  
6) 
Important Medical Events (IME) that may not result in death, be life threatening, or require hospitalization 
may be considered serious when, based upon medical judgment, they may jeopardize the patient or 
subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
definition. (FDA, 21 CFR 312.32; ICH E2A and ICH E6). 
 
ALL SERIOUS adverse events that meet the above criteria MUST be immediately reported to the NCI via CTEP-
AERS within the timeframes detailed in the table below. 
Hospitalization 
Grade 1 and Grade 2 Timeframes 
Grade 3-5 
Timeframes 
Resulting in 
Hospitalization  
≥ 24 hrs 
10 Calendar Days 
24-Hour 5 Calendar 
Days 
Not resulting in 
Hospitalization  
≥ 24 hrs 
Not required 
NOTE:  Protocol specific exceptions to expedited reporting of serious adverse events are found in the Specific 
Protocol Exceptions to Expedited Reporting (SPEER) portion of the CAEPR. 
Expedited AE reporting timelines are defined as: 
o 
“24-Hour; 5 Calendar Days” - The AE must initially be reported via CTEP-AERS within 24 hours of learning 
of the AE, followed by a complete expedited report within 5 calendar days of the initial 24-hour report. 
o 
“10 Calendar Days” - A complete expedited report on the AE must be submitted within 10 calendar days of 
learning of the AE. 
1Serious adverse events that occur more than 30 days after the last administration of investigational 
agent/intervention and have an attribution of possible, probable, or definite require reporting as follows:  
Expedited 24-hour notification followed by complete report within 5 calendar days for: 
• 
All Grade 3, 4, and Grade 5 AEs 
Expedited 10 calendar day reports for: 
• 
Grade 2 AEs resulting in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization 
2For studies using PET or SPECT IND agents, the AE reporting period is limited to 10 radioactive half-lives, 
rounded UP to the nearest whole day, after the agent/intervention was last administered.  Footnote “1” above 
applies after this reporting period. 
Effective Date:  May 5, 2011 
 
7.6 
ROUTINE ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING TO CTEP 
All Adverse Events must be reported in routine study data submissions.  AEs reported through 
CTEP-AERS must also be reported in routine study data submissions. 
7.7 
NCI-IRB REPORTING 
7.7.1 NCI-IRB Expedited Reporting of Unanticipated Problems and Deaths 
The Protocol PI will report to the NCI-IRB: 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
• All deaths, except deaths due to progressive disease  
• All Protocol Deviations 
• All Unanticipated Problems 
• All non-compliance 
Reports must be received by the NCI-IRB within 7 working days of PI awareness via iRIS. 
7.7.2 NCI-IRB Requirements for PI Reporting at Continuing Review 
The protocol PI will report to the NCI-IRB:  
1. A summary of all protocol deviations in a tabular format to include the date the deviation 
occurred, a brief description of the deviation and any corrective action. 
2. A summary of any instances of non-compliance 
3. A tabular summary of the following adverse events: 
• All Grade 2 unexpected events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to the 
research;  
• All Grade 3 and 4 events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to the 
research;  
• All Grade 5 events regardless of attribution;  
• All Serious Events regardless of attribution.  
NOTE: Grade 1 events are not required to be reported.  
7.7.3 NCI-IRB Reporting of IND Safety Reports 
Only IND Safety Reports that meet the definition of an unanticipated problem will need to be 
reported to the NCI IRB. 
7.8 
SECONDARY MALIGNANCY 
7.8.1 A secondary malignancy is a cancer caused by treatment for a previous malignancy (e.g., 
treatment with investigational agent/intervention, radiation or chemotherapy). A 
secondary malignancy is not considered a metastasis of the initial neoplasm.  
CTEP requires all secondary malignancies that occur following treatment with an agent under an 
NCI IND/IDE be reported via CTEP-AERS. Three options are available to describe the event:  
• Leukemia secondary to oncology chemotherapy (e.g., acute myelocytic leukemia 
[AML])  
• Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)  
• Treatment-related secondary malignancy  
Any malignancy possibly related to cancer treatment (including AML/MDS) should also be 
reported via the routine reporting mechanisms outlined in each protocol.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
7.8.2 A second malignancy is one unrelated to the treatment of a prior malignancy (and is 
NOT a metastasis from the initial malignancy).  Second malignancies require ONLY 
routine reporting via CDUS unless otherwise specified.  
7.9 
DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING PLAN 
7.9.1 Principal Investigator/Research Team  
The clinical research team will meet on a regular basis weekly when patients are being actively 
treated on the trial to discuss each patient. Decisions about dose level enrollment and dose 
escalation if applicable will be made based on the toxicity data from prior patients.  
All data will be collected in a timely manner and reviewed by the principal investigator or a lead 
associate investigator. Adverse events will be reported as required above. Any safety concerns, 
new information that might affect either the ethical and or scientific conduct of the trial, or 
protocol deviations will be immediately reported to the IRB using iRIS and to the Sponsor.  
The principal investigator will review adverse event and response data on each patient to ensure 
safety and data accuracy. The principal investigator will personally conduct or supervise the 
investigation and provide appropriate delegation of responsibilities to other members of the 
research staff.  
8 
PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION 
8.1 
CTEP IND AGENT: BMN 673 (TALAZOPARIB) (IND# 119558; NSC 771561) 
8.1.1 Chemical Name: 3H-Pyrido[4,3,2-de]phthalazin-3-one, 5-fluoro-8-(4-fluorophenyl)-
2,7,8,9-tetrahydro-9-(1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)-, (8S,9R)-, 4-
methylbenzenesulfonate (1:1) 
8.1.2 Other Names: BMN 673 ts 
8.1.3 Classification: poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor 
8.1.4 CAS: 1207456-01-6 
8.1.5 Molecular Formula: C26H22F2N6O4S (BMN 673 ts) M.W.: 552.5624 (BMN 673 ts) 
8.1.6 Mode of Action: BMN 673 is a potent and specific inhibitor of PARP1 and PARP2, 
preventing PARP-mediated DNA repair of single strand DNA breaks via the base-
excision repair pathway.  It has demonstrated synthetic lethality in tumors with defects in 
DNA repair pathways, such as BRCA mutations and PTEN dysfunction. 
8.1.7 Description: BMN 673 free base is the active moiety of the BMN 673 ts (tosylate salt) 
formulation. 
8.1.8 How Supplied: BMN 673 capsules are supplied by BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc., and 
distributed by the Pharmaceutical Management Branch, CTEP/DCTD/NCI.  BMN 673 is 
supplied as 250 mcg capsules (opaque white, size 4) packaged in 30-count HDPE bottles 
with an induction seal and child-resistant cap.  The hypromellose capsules contain a 
blend of BMN 673 drug substance, silicified microcrystalline cellulose, titanium dioxide, 
red iron oxide, and yellow iron oxide.   

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
BMN 673 capsules may be repackaged from the manufacturer-supplied HDPE bottle into a 
pharmacy-supplied HDPE bottle for dispensing purposes BMN 673.  
8.1.9 Storage: Store BMN 673 capsules at room temperature (15-30°C/59-86°F) and protected 
from light. 
8.1.10 Stability:  Shelf-life stability studies of BMN 673 capsules are ongoing. 
8.1.11 Route of Administration: Oral administration. Take BMN 673 with or without food. 
8.1.12 Potential Drug Interactions: Based on in vitro data, BMN 673 is not likely to inhibit 
metabolism via human cytochrome P450 (CYP 450) enzymes.  Effects of co-
administration of repeat dosing of BMN 673 with other drugs are unknown. 
8.1.13 Availability: BMN 673 is an investigational agent supplied to investigators by the 
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD), NCI. 
8.2 
AGENT ORDERING AND AGENT ACCOUNTABILITY 
NCI-supplied agents may be requested by the Principal Investigator (or their authorized 
designee) at each participating institution.  Pharmaceutical Management Branch (PMB) policy 
requires that agent be shipped directly to the institution where the patient is to be treated.  PMB 
does not permit the transfer of agents between institutions (unless prior approval from PMB is 
obtained).  The CTEP-assigned protocol number must be used for ordering all CTEP-supplied 
investigational agents.  The responsible investigator at each participating institution must be 
registered with CTEP, DCTD through an annual submission of FDA Form 1572 (Statement of 
Investigator), Curriculum Vitae, Supplemental Investigator Data Form (IDF), and Financial 
Disclosure Form (FDF).  If there are several participating investigators at one institution, CTEP-
supplied investigational agents for the study should be ordered under the name of one lead 
investigator at that institution. 
Active CTEP-registered investigators and investigator-designated shipping designees and 
ordering designees can submit agent requests through the PMB Online Agent Order Processing 
(OAOP) application (https://eapps-ctep.nci.nih.gov/OAOP/pages/login.jspx).  Access to OAOP 
requires the establishment of a CTEP Identity and Access Management (IAM) account 
(https://eapps-ctep.nci.nih.gov/iam/) and the maintenance of an “active” account status and a 
“current” password.  For questions about drug orders, transfers, returns, or accountability, call 
(240) 276-6575 Monday through Friday between 8:30 am and 4:30 pm (ET) or email 
PMBAfterHours@mail.nih.gov anytime. 
 
8.3 
AGENT INVENTORY RECORDS 
The investigator, or a responsible party designated by the investigator, must maintain a careful 
record of the inventory and disposition of all agents received from DCTD using the NCI Drug 
Accountability Record Form (DARF).  (See the NCI Investigator’s Handbook for Procedures for 
Drug Accountability and Storage.) 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
9 
BIOMARKER, CORRELATIVE, AND SPECIAL STUDIES   
The overall goal of the correlative studies is to identify potential predictive biomarkers of 
subsequent PARPi response and further elucidate the PARPi clinical resistance mechanisms in 
BRCA1/2 mutation-associated malignancies. Patients will undergo a mandatory biopsy at 
baseline. Optional research biopsies will be performed on C1D28 (before C2D1) of treatment 
and/or at progression to assess the effect of response to BMN 673 (talazoparib) therapy at 
minimal risk. Blood samples will be collected at baseline, on approximately C1D28 (before 
C2D1), and at progression. Supernatants and/or pellets may be collected from patients who 
undergo either therapeutic or diagnostic thoracentesis or paracentesis while on study. The 
following tests will be performed on patients’ specimens, in order of priority (Tables 6 and 7). 
All patients on the study are requested to submit a block of tissue or 20 paraffin-capped 
unstained slides from a recent resection or barring that, from the original surgery. All efforts will 
be made to obtain these samples to achieve the secondary objectives.   
 
Table 8. Integrative Biomarkers 
Integrated biomarkers name  
Assay 
Tissue/Body Fluid Tested and 
Timing of Assay 
Secondary mutation of BRCA 1 
and BRCA 2 
(Lee, WMB; with Dr. Elizabeth 
Swisher at University of 
Washington) 
Next Generation Sequencing to 
elucidate the secondary 
mutations of BRCA 1 and 2 
Tissue/ Baseline (mandatory 
biopsy) and at progression 
(optional) 
FOXO3a, 53BP1 and RAD51 
(Lee, WMB; MDAnderson RPPA 
core)26 
Reverse phase protein 
microarray (RPPA)26  
Tissue/ Baseline (mandatory 
biopsy), C1D29 (optional, prior to 
C2D1) and at progression 
(optional) 
 
Table 9. Exploratory Biomarkers 
Exploratory Biomarker name  
Assay 
Tissue/Blood Tested 
and Timing of Assay 
Secondary mutations of 
BRCA1/BRCA2 and p53 
mutation in circulating tumor 
(ct)DNA 
(Lee, WMB: with James D. 
Brenton at Cancer Research UK 
Cambridge Institute, University of 
Next Generation Sequencing: 
Correlation of baseline of 
BRCA1/BRCA2 secondary 
mutation, and correlation of 
baseline or changes of p53 
mutation in ctDNA with clinical 
response. 
Peripheral blood/ Baseline, prior 
to C2D1, and at progression 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Cambridge, UK 
Enumeration of circulating 
tumor cells (CTCs) 
(Lee, WMB; with Jane Trepel, 
Preclinical Development Research 
Core/CCR/NCI) 
Ferrofluidic enrichment and 
multi-parameter flow 
cytometric: Correlation of 
baseline or changes in CTCs 
with clinical response39. 
 
Peripheral blood/ Baseline, prior 
to C2D1, and at progression 
 
gH2AX/Mre11 by flow 
cytometry 
(Lee, WMB; Dr. Lee’s laboratory 
team) 
Multi-parameter flow 
cytometry: Correlation of 
baseline with clinical outcome  
PBMC/Baseline only 
 
Immune subsets 
(Lee, WMB; with Jane Trepel, 
Preclinical Development Research 
Core/CCR/NCI) 
Multi-parameter flow cytometry 
Correlation of baseline or 
changes in immune subsets with 
clinical response. 
 
Peripheral blood/ Baseline, prior 
to C2D1, and at progression 
 
PTIP mRNA quantitative PCR 
(Lee, WMB; Dr. Nussenzweig’s 
group) 
mRNA expression by 
quantitative PCR in tumor 
samples 
 
Tissue/Baseline 
 
 
SLFN11 (SCHLAFEN 11) 
mRNA quantitative PCR 
(Lee, WMB; Dr. Pommier’s 
group, DCTB/CCR/NCI) 
mRNA expression by 
quantitative PCR in tumor 
samples 
 
Tissue/Baseline 
 
 
9.1 
TUMOR BIOPSIES 
9.1.1 Rationale 
The on-study biopsy and the optional second/third biopsies are necessary for the execution of the 
critical translational endpoints evaluating proof of concept and demonstration of mechanism and 
activity. The primary purpose of the pretreatment biopsy is for genetic analysis for secondary 
mutations that may reinstate a functional BRCA1 or BRCA2 protein. Tumor biopsies will be 
evaluated for, but not limited to DNA damage response and resistance markers such as γH2AX, 
phosphoATM/ATR, FOXO3a, RAD51, 53BP1, PTIP, and SLFN11.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
9.1.2 Tissue acquisition  
• 
Our collaborators in Interventional Radiology will obtain core biopsies of a sentinel 
lesion. Where ever safe, the sentinel lesion is preferred to be one that has either 
progressed on the prior PARPi therapy or developed de novo while on the prior PARPi. If 
this is not safe or feasible, biopsy of another lesion is permissible.   
• 
Biopsy procedures are for research purposes and will be done after protocol consent is 
obtained, and always prior to drug initiation. Second (optional, but highly encouraged) 
biopsy will be requested prior to C2d1.  
• 
Biopsies from a new lesion or site of progression will be requested at the time of drug 
discontinuation (optional).  
 
9.1.3 Timing  
Biopsies will be performed at the following times: 
• Mandatory – after consent, prior to treatment on cycle 1 day 1 
• Optional, highly encouraged - cycle 1 day 28 of treatment (prior to cycle 2 day1) 
• Optional - at the time of progression  
Attempts will be made to obtain four cores if safe and feasible, which will be frozen for research 
studies. Inability to get tissue with a reasonable attempt will not preclude treatment and the 
patient will remain eligible for all other translational components. Members of the interventional 
radiology team will decide the type of imaging used to facilitate biopsies. Should CT scans be 
needed for biopsy, a limit of 10 scans for each procedure will be observed to minimize radiation 
exposure to the patient.  
The biopsies are to be immediately embedded, frozen, and stored in the Lee lab at -800C on site 
according to our laboratory SOP (Appendix B, Section 16.2). The schedule for the biopsies will 
be made with Special Procedures (Dr. Brad Wood). Members of the Lee lab will be on call to 
receive and embed biopsies on site in special procedures: Phone (301) 496-3776, beeper 102-
11155.  
Each patient sample set will be assigned a unique patient identifier. The protocol scientific 
investigator(s) handling the samples will be blinded as to the patient identification, patient data 
and outcome.  
Biopsy material will be prioritized for genomic sequencing and proteomics. The remaining tissue 
will be released for additional testing prioritized to other DNA damage repair pathways analyses, 
and immunohistochemistry, in that order. 
 
9.2 
SECONDARY MUTATIONS OF BRCA 1 AND BRCA 2 
Biopsy materials from the pretreatment biopsy will be prioritized for secondary BRCA mutation 
testing. Next generation sequencing 40,41 or massively parallel sequencing42 has been applied to 
study the secondary mutations of BRCA 1 and 2 in tumor or blood samples. We will collaborate 
with Dr. Elizabeth Swisher’s group at University of Washington for DNA sequencing to 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
elucidate the secondary mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients who developed progression on 
the first PARPi-based therapy. Anonymized patient samples will be batched to 
 
 
 
Elizabeth Swisher, MD 
 
 
Professor, Dept. Ob/Gyn 
 
 
University of Washington 
 
 
1959 NE Pacific St 
 
 
Seattle, WA 98195 
 
 
(206) 543-3669 
 
 
Email: swishere@uw.edu” 
 
 
9.3 
TISSUE LYSATE ARRAY PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS 
Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) is a high-throughput antibody-based technique developed 
for functional proteomics studies to evaluate protein activities in signaling networks. RPPA will 
be employed to quantitate activated and inactive signaling components of the DNA damage 
repair pathways and the presence or absence of 53BP1 and RAD51 before therapy.25 Analysis of 
specific proteins and their activation status target proteins are listed on MD Anderson RPPA core 
facility website (http://www.mdanderson.org/education-and-research/resources-for-
professionals/scientific-resources/core-facilities-and-services/functional-proteomics-rppa-
core/index.html.  MD Anderson has ongoing real time quality control and identifies those 
proteins and/or samples that do not meet standards. 
 
9.4 
LASER CAPTURE MICRODISSECTION AND SANGER SEQUENCING ANALYSES FOR 
SECONDARY MUTATIONS OF BRCA1 AND BRCA2 
Reversion mutation events may be difficult to identify by next generation sequencing, which 
sequences short DNA pieces in which it is difficult to differentiate wildtype sequence coming 
from contaminating non-tumor cells from wildtype sequence in tumor DNA secondary to 
reversion of the mutant allele. Swisher laboratory is currently developing and testing 
bioinformatic algorithms for BROCA-HR that will identify these reversion events by comparing 
variant reads at the mutation site with careful allele ratio assessments of the nearby chromosomal 
region. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) on a pure neoplastic cell population13 will 
complement BROCA-HR sequencing. Swisher group will also assess the mutation site with 
Sanger sequencing. If a reversion event is suspected, allelotyping is performed at informative 
intragenic SNPs. In this study, Swisher laboratory will assess for secondary somatic mutations 
using the LCM and Sanger sequencing and compare that to predictions provided by a new 
reversion algorithm with BROCA-HR done without LCM.  
Coded patient samples will be batched to 
 
 
Elizabeth Swisher, MD 
 
 
Professor, Dept. Ob/Gyn 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
 
 
University of Washington 
 
 
1959 NE Pacific St 
 
 
Seattle, WA 98195 
 
 
(206) 543-3669 
 
 
Email: swishere@uw.edu 
 
Requirements for the assay: 
1. One H&E section and three 8 micron sections of the biopsy specimen on membrane slides 
(LCM0522, Applied Biosystems). Can be shipped at room temperature.  
2. Information of the specific mutation to be evaluated (unless already obtained from BROCA-
HR) 
 
Methods: Neoplastic DNA is obtained by LCM and isolated with the PicoPure DNA extraction 
kit. Sanger sequencing is performed around the known mutation site. When a reversion mutation 
is suspected, further sequencing of informative intragenic SNPs (which are identified through 
BROCA-HR sequencing of germline DNA) is performed to confirm that detected wildtype 
sequence is truly coming from the mutant allele. 
The results of molecular studies conducted using tissue specimens are for research purposes only 
and will not be disclosed to individual subjects. The exception to this is potential incidental 
findings that are deemed medically significant and actionable. The policy for this disclosure is 
outlined below and in the consent form for this study. 
• Subjects will be given the opportunity to choose whether or not they would like to be 
contacted if a clinically actionable gene variant is discovered. Clinically actionable 
findings for the purpose of this study are defined as disorders appearing in the American 
College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations for the return of incidental 
findings that is current at the time of primary analysis. (A list of current guidelines is 
maintained on the CCR intranet: 
https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/display/CCRCRO/Incidental+Findings+Lists) 
• Subjects that have opted to have findings returned and who still remain on the study will 
be contacted at this time with a request to provide a blood sample to be sent to a CLIA 
certified laboratory. If the research findings are verified in the CLIA certified lab, the 
subject will be referred to genetics counseling for the disclosure of the results. Funding 
for a CLIA laboratory confirmation will be decided after discussion with the patients, 
their health insurance companies, or other appropriate funding resources at CCR/NCI.  
• This is the only time during the course of the study that incidental findings will be 
returned. No interrogations regarding clinically actionable findings will be made after the 
primary analysis.  
• Contact information must be maintained on subjects that have opted to have their results 
returned. If a subject’s participation in the study ends prior to the primary analysis, they 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
should be enrolled on study 96-C-0071, a follow up protocol, in order to allow for post 
study contact for the dissemination of any incidental findings and the maintenance of 
contact information.  
9.5 
DATA SHARING PLANS 
9.5.1 Human Data Sharing Plan 
What data will be shared? 
I will share human data generated in this research for future research as follows : 
_X__ De-identified data in an NIH-funded or approved public repository.   
_X__ De-identified data in BTRIS (automatic for activities in the Clinical Center) 
 
How and where will the data be shared?  
Data will be shared through: 
X An NIH-funded or approved public repository:  clinicaltrials.gov. 
_X__ BTRIS (automatic for activities in the Clinical Center) 
_X__ Publication and/or public presentations. 
 
When will the data be shared?  
_X__ At the time of publication or shortly thereafter. 
9.5.2 Genomic Data Sharing Plan 
Unlinked genomic data will be deposited in public genomic databases such as dbGaP in 
compliance with the NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy. 
9.6 
PTIP MRNA QUANTITATIVE PCR 
Nussenzweig’s group32 recently showed loss of PTIP reverses the HR defect in the BRCA1-
knockout B cells shown by reaccumulation of RAD51 foci, and subsequent resection of DSB. 
We will collaborate with Dr. Nussenzweig to develop the protocol to measure mRNA expression 
by quantitative PCR in tumor samples. This will be done in an exploratory fashion.   
9.7 
SLFN11 (SCHLAFEN 11) MRNA QUANTITATIVE PCR 
SLFN11 is a gene recently identified as a determinant of cell death and cell cycle arrest in 
response to DNA targeted agents including topoisomerase inhibitors, DNA cross-linking agents, 
such as platinums. Zoppoli et al.43 reported SLFN11 expression in ovarian and colorectal cancers 
and normal corresponding tissues from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and high SLFN11 
expression independently predicts overall survival in a group of ovarian cancer patients treated 
with cisplatin-containing regimens. Pommier’s group also recently reported SLFN11 expression 
is causally linked to cancer cell death response to BMN 673 (talazoparib) (AACR 2014). We will 
collaborate with Dr. Pommier to develop the protocol to measure mRNA expression by 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
quantitative PCR or protein by IHC in tumor samples. This will be done in an exploratory 
fashion.  
9.8 
TESTS ON PERIPHERAL BLOOD SAMPLES  
The following tests will be performed on patients’ peripheral blood samples, in order of priority. 
These correlative studies will be done in an exploratory fashion.  
Blood samples will be collected prior to treatment on cycle 1 day, cycle 1 day 28 of treatment 
(prior to cycle 2 day1), and at the time of progression  
9.8.1  Secondary mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in circulating tumor (ct) DNA 
Dr. James D. Brenton’s group, Cancer Research, UK showed very low frequency mutational 
changes can be detected in ctDNA, 0.2-1% frequency within all DNA reads, for TP53 missense 
mutations using HiSeq 2000 sequencing or digital PCR44; this may underestimate the ability to 
observe a unique mutational change such as the defined revertant mutations. Revertant mutations 
of BRCA1 and BRCA2 may be identified using highly sensitive ctDNA NGS methods. 
Identification of novel BRCA1/2 transcripts in ctDNA may be sufficient to suggest a revertant 
mutation has occurred. A successful ctDNA assay will allow demonstration of tumor 
reacquisition of HR function in a noninvasive modality.  Additionally, we will also follow TP53 
missense mutation changes on treatment as a reference mutation. For this, I will collaborate with 
Dr. Brenton to apply his validated system to this question (See Appendix C, Section 16.3; SOP 
for the sample collection).  
• Samples will be collected in Two-9mL EDTA tubes (lavender top tubes) at baseline, 
cycle 1 day 29 (prior to cycle 2 day1), and at progression.   
• The key is to maximize removal of contaminating cells and genomic DNA from these 
cells as large genomic DNA fragments hinder plasma DNA analysis. 
• CRITICAL STEP: Time between blood draw and processing should be less than 1 
hour. Gently invert tubes after blood draw. Do not shake or vortex tubes as cellular lysis 
could occur.  
• Notification and Handling of Samples: members of the Lee lab on call to receive 
specimens: Phone (301) 496-3776, beeper 102-11155. 
9.8.2 Enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) 
Multiple clinical studies done using CTC enumeration shows that presence of CTC is a strong 
prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with metastatic breast, colorectal or prostate 
cancer.41,45 The predictive role of CTCs in ovarian cancer is not well defined. Previous antibody-
based methods resulted in low CTC detection rates, and the majority of CTCs detected in these 
previous studies may not have been viable.46 47 We will collaborate with Jane Trepel at 
Preclinical Development Research Core/CCR/NCI correlate baseline or changes in CTCs with 
clinical response. 26 
• Blood will be collected to correlate baseline or changes in CTCs39 with clinical response. 
CTCs will be investigated using ferrofluidic enrichment and multi-parameter flow 
cytometric detection. CTCs are identified by positive for expression of epithelial markers 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
including but not limited to EpCAM and negative for expression of the pan-
hematopoietic markers including but not limited to CD45. 
• Collection of Specimen(s): Two 9-mL EDTA tubes (lavender top tubes) will be collected 
from each patient at the following time points: baseline, and C1d29, and at the time of 
progression.  
• Immediately after collection, invert the blood tubes 3-4 times. 
• Notification and Handling of Samples: as soon as possible after the patient is scheduled 
please send email notification to the Trepel lab: Jane Trepel at trepel@helix.nih.gov; 
Min-Jung Lee at leemin@mail.nih.gov that the sample is scheduled. As soon as the 
sample is drawn, please call the Trepel lab at 301-496-1547 to communicate that the 
sample is ready. Keep the sample on the unit at room temperature. The sample will be 
picked up by the lab and processed for CTC enumeration. 
9.8.3 gH2AX and/or MRE11 by flow cytometry 
γH2AX and MRE11 have been employed individually as surrogate measures of DNA DSB 
damage and repair, respectively, but neither alone has been proven a predictive biomarker. Our 
preliminary data suggest high γH2AX and low MRE11 expression in patient PBMCs prior to 
initiation of olaparib and carboplatin correlated with poor response to PARPi therapy in 
gBRCAm-associated cancers48 ( Lee et al, manuscript submitted). 
• PBMC samples will be collected and archived for flow cytometric determination of 
DNA damage and repair using flow cytometric γH2AX and MRE11 dual-labeling 
assay. 
• Samples will be collected in Two-8ml BD Vacutainer CPT (blue/black tubes) at 
baseline only.  
• The specimens must be processed to cryopreserve PBMC aliquots within 2-3 hours of 
collection. The sample will then be separated into plasma and divided into aliquots 
and frozen. Plasma will be separated immediately upon receipt and aliquots frozen at 
–800C (no greater than 1 ml aliquots) in Jane Trepel’s lab in building 10.  
• Notification and Handling of Samples: as soon as possible after the patient is 
scheduled please send email notification to the Trepel lab at trepel@helix.nih.gov; 
Min-Jung Lee at  leemin@mail.nih.gov and yusuke.tomita@nih.gov and call the 
Trepel lab at 301-496-1547 to arrange for immediate pick-up when the sample is 
drawn. 
9.8.4 Immune Subsets 
Emerging data suggest there is an interplay between chemotherapies and the host immune 
system49,50. Further, tumors with high genomic instability, such as ovarian cancer, may trigger 
host immune reaction, which may correlate with patient clinical outcome51. Hence, monitoring 
immune subsets in ovarian cancer patients may facilitate the establishment of personalized 
therapy in ovarian cancer.  
PBMCs will be assessed using multiparameter flow cytometry for immune subsets including but 
not necessarily limited to Tregs, MDSC, effector and exhausted CD8+ T-cells and their 
functional markers, i.e. PD-1, TIM3, CTLA-4 and/or CD40.   
• Collection of Specimen(s): Two 8-ml BD Vacutainer CPT (blue/black tubes) will be 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
collected from each patient at the following time points: baseline, and C1d29 (prior to 
C2d1), and at time of progression.   
• Immediately after collection, mix the blood sample by gentle inversion several times. The 
date and exact time of each blood draw should be recorded on the tube.   
• Notification and Handling of Samples: as soon as possible after the patient is scheduled 
please send email notification to the Trepel lab at trepel@helix.nih.gov; Min-Jung Lee at  
leemin@mail.nih.gov and yusuke.tomita@nih.gov and call the Trepel lab at 301-496-
1547 to arrange for immediate pick-up when the sample is drawn. 
9.9 
SAMPLE STORAGE, TRACKING AND DISPOSITION 
Each patient sample set will be assigned a unique patient identifier in the recipient lab with bar 
coding in the Clinical Pharmacology Program (CPP) laboratories and the scientific investigator 
handling and performing analyses on the samples will be blinded as to the sample source, patient 
data, and outcome.  There will be no date identifiers on the samples. Samples will be grouped for 
scientific analyses. If a patient needs to have a malignant effusion tapped for diagnostic or 
therapeutic purposes, a sample will be collected for research. At the end of the protocol, samples 
will be stored for potential further analysis as new information becomes available (only for those 
subjects who consented to future optional studies). Any new use of identified or coded samples, 
specimens, or data will undergo prospective and continuing IRB review and approval.  The PI 
will report any loss or destruction of samples to the IRB.   
Samples, and associated data, will be stored in the locations listed above unless the patient 
withdraws consent. If researchers have samples remaining once they have completed all studies 
associated with the protocol, they must be returned to Dr. Lee’s laboratory or to the CPP 
repository. Samples can only be saved at completion of study for future use if subjects consent. 
Access to these samples will only be granted following IRB approval of an additional protocol, 
granting the rights to use the material.  
If, at any time, a patient withdraws from the study and does not wish for their existing samples to 
be utilized, the individual must provide a written request. Following receipt of this request, the 
samples will be destroyed (or returned to the patient, if so requested), and reported as such to the 
IRB. Any samples lost (in transit or by a researcher) or destroyed due to unknown sample 
integrity (i.e. broken freezer allows for extensive sample thawing, etc.) will be reported as such 
to the IRB. 
Samples will be ordered and tracked through the CRIS Screens.  Should a CRIS screen not be 
available, the NIH form 2803-1 will be completed and will accompany the specimen and be filed 
in the medical record.  Samples will not be sent outside NIH without IRB notification and an 
executed MTA.  
9.10 PROTOCOL COMPLETION/SAMPLE DESTRUCTION 
All specimens obtained in the protocol are used as defined in the protocol. Any specimens that 
are remaining at the completion of the protocol will be stored in the conditions described above. 
The study will remain open so long as sample or data analysis continues. Samples from 
consenting subjects will be stored until they are no longer of scientific value or if a subject 
withdraws consent for their continued use, at which time they will be destroyed. Once primary 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
research objectives for the protocol are achieved, intramural researchers can request access to 
remaining samples providing they have an IRB approved protocol and patient consent. 
The PI will report any loss or destruction of samples to the NCI IRB as soon as he is made aware 
of such loss. The PI will report destroyed samples to the IRB if samples become unsalvageable 
because of environmental factors (ex. broken freezer or lack of dry ice in a shipping container) or 
if a patient withdraws consent. Samples will also be reported as lost if they are lost in transit 
between facilities or misplaced by a researcher. Freezer problems, lost samples or other problems 
associated with samples will also be reported to the IRB, the NCI Clinical Director, and the 
office of the CCR, NCI. 
10 DATA REPORTING / REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 
10.1 DATA REPORTING 
10.1.1 Method 
This study will be monitored by the Clinical Data Update System (CDUS) Version 3.0.  
Cumulative protocol- and patient-specific CDUS data will be submitted electronically to 
CTEP on a quarterly basis, either by FTP burst of data or via the CDUS web application.  
Reports are due January 31, April 30, July 31, and October 31.  Instructions for 
submitting data using the CDUS can be found on the CTEP Web site 
(http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/cdus.html).  
Note:  If your study has been assigned to CDUS-Complete reporting, all adverse events 
(both routine and expedited) that have occurred on the study and meet the mandatory 
CDUS reporting guidelines must be reported via the monitoring method identified above.  
If your study has been assigned to CDUS-Abbreviated reporting, no adverse event 
reporting (routine or expedited) is required to be reported via CDUS. 
10.2 COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENTS LANGUAGE 
The agent(s) supplied by CTEP, DCTD, NCI used in this protocol is/are provided to the NCI 
under a Collaborative Agreement (CRADA, CTA, CSA) between the Pharmaceutical 
Company(ies) (hereinafter referred to as “Collaborator(s)”) and the NCI Division of Cancer 
Treatment and Diagnosis.  Therefore, the following obligations/guidelines, in addition to the 
provisions in the “Intellectual Property Option to Collaborator”  
(http://ctep.cancer.gov/industryCollaborations2/intellectual_property.htm) contained within the 
terms of award, apply to the use of the Agent(s) in this study: 
1. Agent(s) may not be used for any purpose outside the scope of this protocol, nor can 
Agent(s) be transferred or licensed to any party not participating in the clinical study.  
Collaborator(s) data for Agent(s) are confidential and proprietary to Collaborator(s) and shall 
be maintained as such by the investigators.  The protocol documents for studies utilizing 
Agents contain confidential information and should not be shared or distributed without the 
permission of the NCI.  If a copy of this protocol is requested by a patient or patient’s family 
member participating on the study, the individual should sign a confidentiality agreement.  A 
suitable model agreement can be downloaded from: http://ctep.cancer.gov. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
2. For a clinical protocol where there is an investigational Agent used in combination with 
(an)other Agent(s), each the subject of different Collaborative Agreements, the access to and 
use of data by each Collaborator shall be as follows (data pertaining to such combination use 
shall hereinafter be referred to as "Multi-Party Data”): 
a. NCI will provide all Collaborators with prior written notice regarding the existence and 
nature of any agreements governing their collaboration with NCI, the design of the 
proposed combination protocol, and the existence of any obligations that would tend to 
restrict NCI's participation in the proposed combination protocol. 
 
b. Each Collaborator shall agree to permit use of the Multi-Party Data from the clinical trial 
by any other Collaborator solely to the extent necessary to allow said other Collaborator 
to develop, obtain regulatory approval or commercialize its own Agent. 
 
c. Any Collaborator having the right to use the Multi-Party Data from these trials must 
agree in writing prior to the commencement of the trials that it will use the Multi-Party 
Data solely for development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of its own 
Agent. 
 
3. Clinical Trial Data and Results and Raw Data developed under a Collaborative Agreement 
will be made available to Collaborator(s), the NCI, and the FDA, as appropriate and unless 
additional disclosure is required by law or court order as described in the IP Option to 
Collaborator (http://ctep.cancer.gov/industryCollaborations2/intellectual_property.htm).  
Additionally, all Clinical Data and Results and Raw Data will be collected, used and 
disclosed consistent with all applicable federal statutes and regulations for the protection of 
human subjects, including, if applicable, the Standards for Privacy of Individually 
Identifiable Health Information set forth in 45 C.F.R. Part 164. 
4. When a Collaborator wishes to initiate a data request, the request should first be sent to the 
NCI, who will then notify the appropriate investigators (Group Chair for Cooperative Group 
studies, or PI for other studies) of Collaborator's wish to contact them. 
5. Any data provided to Collaborator(s) for Phase 3 studies must be in accordance with the 
guidelines and policies of the responsible Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), if there is a 
DMC for this clinical trial. 
6. Any manuscripts reporting the results of this clinical trial must be provided to CTEP by the 
Group office for Cooperative Group studies or by the principal investigator for non-
Cooperative Group studies for immediate delivery to Collaborator(s) for advisory review and 
comment prior to submission for publication.  Collaborator(s) will have 30 days from the 
date of receipt for review.  Collaborator shall have the right to request that publication be 
delayed for up to an additional 30 days in order to ensure that Collaborator’s confidential and 
proprietary data, in addition to Collaborator(s)’s intellectual property rights, are protected.  
Copies of abstracts must be provided to CTEP for forwarding to Collaborator(s) for courtesy 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
review as soon as possible and preferably at least three (3) days prior to submission, but in 
any case, prior to presentation at the meeting or publication in the proceedings.  Press 
releases and other media presentations must also be forwarded to CTEP prior to release.  
Copies of any manuscript, abstract and/or press release/ media presentation should be sent to: 
 
Email:  ncicteppubs@mail.nih.gov 
 
The Regulatory Affairs Branch will then distribute them to Collaborator(s).  No publication, 
manuscript or other form of public disclosure shall contain any of Collaborator’s confidential/ 
proprietary information. 
 
10.2.1 A Sample Transfer Agreement with the University of Washington will be executed prior 
to the shipment of any samples from NCI to the collaborator(s) at the University of 
Washington for the purpose of biomarker, correlative, and/or special studies.  
10.3 DATA COLLECTION 
The investigators will be responsible for the collection, maintenance, quality control of the study 
data. Clinical data will be entered into the NCI C3D electronic database at least once every 2 
weeks when patients are enrolled on the trial. Protocol specific electronic Case Report Forms 
(eCRFs) will be developed for this trial in C3D. 
End of study procedures: Data will be stored according to HHS, FDA regulations and NIH 
Intramural Records Retention Schedule as applicable.  
Loss or destruction of data: Should we become aware that a major breech in our plan to protect 
subject confidentiality and trial data has occurred, the IRB will be notified.  
  
10.3.1 Source documents 
Source documents are defined as original documents, data and records. This   may include 
hospital records, clinical and office charts, laboratory data/information, patients' diaries or 
evaluation checklists, pharmacy dispensing and other records, recorded data from automated 
instruments, microfiches, photographic negatives, microfilm or magnetic media, X-rays. The 
investigator will permit trial-related monitoring, audits, IRB review, and regulatory inspection(s), 
providing direct access to source documents. 
10.3.2 Case Report Forms 
Data may be entered from the source documents directly into eCRFs in C3D for each patient 
enrolled in this study. The principal investigator or research nurse will review the eCRFs for 
completeness and accuracy. Independent audits may also be conducted by NCI personnel to 
ensure completeness and accuracy of data in C3D.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
11 STUDY CALENDAR 
Baseline evaluations are to be conducted within 1 week prior to start of protocol therapy.  Scans 
and X-rays must be done within 17 days prior to the start of therapy.  In the event that the 
patient’s condition is deteriorating, laboratory evaluations should be repeated within 48 hours 
prior to initiation of the next cycle of therapy. 
Procedure 
Screening 
Pre-study 
Baseline 
 
Cycle 1 
Cycle 2 and after 
Off Treatmentc 
Wk 
1 
Wk 
2 
Wk 
3 
Wk 
4 
Wk 
1 
Wk 
2 
Wk 
3 
Wk 
4 
Administration of BMN 673 
(talazoparib) 
 
 
A 
A 
A 
A 
A 
A 
A 
A 
 
Informed consent 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical history 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Concurrent meds 
 
X 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Physical exam 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
Vital signs 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
Height 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weight 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
Performance status 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
CBC w/diff, plts 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Xf 
Xf 
Xf 
X 
PBMCs for correlative studies 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CTC analysis 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
Serum chemistrya 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
B-HCG 
Xb 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EKG (as indicated) 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Confirmation of Diagnosis in 
NCI Laboratory of Pathology 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adverse event evaluation  
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
Tumor biopsyd 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
CT scans e 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
Reassessment noninvasive 
imaging 
 
 
Re-staging every 2 cycles 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
A: BMN 673 (talazoparib) at the RP2D of 1000 μg/day daily of a 28d cycle. 
a: Albumin, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, bicarbonate, BUN, calcium, chloride, creatinine, 
glucose, LDH, phosphorus, potassium, total protein, SGOT [AST], SGPT [ALT], sodium. 
b: Serum pregnancy test (women of childbearing potential). 
c: Off-therapy evaluation.   
d:  Mandatory tumor biopsy will be done at baseline, and optional biopsies will be performed on C1D29 
(prior to C2D1) and at progression. 
e:  Scans must be done within 17 days prior to the start of therapy.  
f: As clinically indicated.  
12 MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT 
12.1 ANTITUMOR EFFECT – SOLID TUMORS 
For the purposes of this study, patients should be re-evaluated for response every two cycles.  In 
addition to a baseline scan, confirmatory scans should also be obtained within four weeks 
following initial documentation of objective response. 
Response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the new international criteria 
proposed by the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline 
(version 1.1).52  Changes in the largest diameter (unidimensional measurement) of the tumor 
lesions and the shortest diameter in the case of malignant lymph nodes are used in the RECIST 
criteria. 
12.1.1 Definitions 
Evaluable for toxicity.  All patients will be evaluable for toxicity from the time of their first 
treatment with BMN 673 (talazoparib). 
Evaluable Non-Target Disease Response.  Patients who have lesions present at baseline that are 
evaluable but do not meet the definitions of measurable disease, have received at least one cycle 
of therapy, and have had their disease re-evaluated will be considered evaluable for non-target 
disease.  The response assessment is based on the presence, absence, or unequivocal progression 
of the lesions.  
12.1.2 Disease Parameters 
Measurable disease.  Measurable lesions are defined as those that can be accurately measured in 
at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as ≥20 mm by chest x-ray or as ≥10 mm 
with CT scan, MRI, or calipers by clinical exam.  All tumor measurements must be recorded in 
millimeters (or decimal fractions of centimeters). 
Note:  Tumor lesions that are situated in a previously irradiated area might or might not be 
considered measurable.  If the investigator thinks it appropriate to include them, the conditions 
under which such lesions should be considered must be defined in the protocol. 
Malignant lymph nodes.  To be considered pathologically enlarged and measurable, a lymph 
node must be ≥15 mm in short axis when assessed by CT scan (CT scan slice thickness 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
recommended to be no greater than 5 mm).  At baseline and in follow-up, only the short axis will 
be measured and followed. 
Non-measurable disease.  All other lesions (or sites of disease), including small lesions (longest 
diameter <10 mm or pathological lymph nodes with ≥10 to <15 mm short axis), are considered 
non-measurable disease.  Bone lesions, leptomeningeal disease, ascites, pleural/pericardial 
effusions, lymphangitis cutis/pulmonitis, inflammatory breast disease, and abdominal masses 
(not followed by CT or MRI), are considered as non-measurable. 
Note:  Cystic lesions that meet the criteria for radiographically defined simple cysts should not 
be considered as malignant lesions (neither measurable nor non-measurable) since they are, by 
definition, simple cysts. 
‘Cystic lesions’ thought to represent cystic metastases can be considered as measurable lesions, 
if they meet the definition of measurability described above. However, if non-cystic lesions are 
present in the same patient, these are preferred for selection as target lesions. 
Target lesions.  All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in 
total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions and recorded 
and measured at baseline.  Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions 
with the longest diameter), be representative of all involved organs, but in addition should be 
those that lend themselves to reproducible repeated measurements.  It may be the case that, on 
occasion, the largest lesion does not lend itself to reproducible measurement in which 
circumstance the next largest lesion which can be measured reproducibly should be selected.  A 
sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesions, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target 
lesions will be calculated and reported as the baseline sum diameters.  If lymph nodes are to be 
included in the sum, then only the short axis is added into the sum.  The baseline sum diameters 
will be used as reference to further characterize any objective tumor regression in the measurable 
dimension of the disease. 
Non-target lesions.  All other lesions (or sites of disease) including any measurable lesions over 
and above the 5 target lesions should be identified as non-target lesions and should also be 
recorded at baseline.  Measurements of these lesions are not required, but the presence, absence, 
or in rare cases unequivocal progression of each should be noted throughout follow-up.  
12.1.3 Methods for Evaluation of Measurable Disease 
All measurements should be taken and recorded in metric notation using a ruler or calipers.  All 
baseline evaluations should be performed as closely as possible to the beginning of treatment and 
never more than 4 weeks before the beginning of the treatment. 
The same method of assessment and the same technique should be used to characterize each 
identified and reported lesion at baseline and during follow-up. Imaging-based evaluation is 
preferred to evaluation by clinical examination unless the lesion(s) being followed cannot be 
imaged but are assessable by clinical exam. 
Clinical lesions  Clinical lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial 
(e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes) and ≥10 mm diameter as assessed using calipers 
(e.g., skin nodules).  In the case of skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a 
ruler to estimate the size of the lesion, is recommended.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Chest x-ray  Lesions on chest x-ray are acceptable as measurable lesions when they are clearly 
defined and surrounded by aerated lung.  However, CT is preferable.  
Conventional CT and MRI  This guideline has defined measurability of lesions on CT scan based 
on the assumption that CT slice thickness is 5 mm or less.  If CT scans have slice thickness 
greater than 5 mm, the minimum size for a measurable lesion should be twice the slice thickness.  
MRI is also acceptable in certain situations (e.g. for body scans).   
Use of MRI remains a complex issue.  MRI has excellent contrast, spatial, and temporal 
resolution; however, there are many image acquisition variables involved in MRI, which greatly 
impact image quality, lesion conspicuity, and measurement.  Furthermore, the availability of 
MRI is variable globally.  As with CT, if an MRI is performed, the technical specifications of the 
scanning sequences used should be optimized for the evaluation of the type and site of disease.  
Furthermore, as with CT, the modality used at follow-up should be the same as was used at 
baseline and the lesions should be measured/assessed on the same pulse sequence.  It is beyond 
the scope of the RECIST guidelines to prescribe specific MRI pulse sequence parameters for all 
scanners, body parts, and diseases.  Ideally, the same type of scanner should be used and the 
image acquisition protocol should be followed as closely as possible to prior scans.  Body scans 
should be performed with breath-hold scanning techniques, if possible. 
PET-CT  At present, the low dose or attenuation correction CT portion of a combined PET-CT is 
not always of optimal diagnostic CT quality for use with RECIST measurements.  However, if 
the site can document that the CT performed as part of a PET-CT is of identical diagnostic 
quality to a diagnostic CT (with IV and oral contrast), then the CT portion of the PET-CT can be 
used for RECIST measurements and can be used interchangeably with conventional CT in 
accurately measuring cancer lesions over time.  Note, however, that the PET portion of the CT 
introduces additional data which may bias an investigator if it is not routinely or serially 
performed.   
Ultrasound  Ultrasound is not useful in assessment of lesion size and should not be used as a 
method of measurement.  Ultrasound examinations cannot be reproduced in their entirety for 
independent review at a later date and, because they are operator dependent, it cannot be 
guaranteed that the same technique and measurements will be taken from one assessment to the 
next.  If new lesions are identified by ultrasound in the course of the study, confirmation by CT 
or MRI is advised.  If there is concern about radiation exposure at CT, MRI may be used instead 
of CT in selected instances. 
Endoscopy, Laparoscopy  The utilization of these techniques for objective tumor evaluation is 
not advised.  However, such techniques may be useful to confirm complete pathological 
response when biopsies are obtained or to determine relapse in trials where recurrence following 
complete response (CR) or surgical resection is an endpoint. 
Tumor markers  Tumor markers alone cannot be used to assess response.  If markers are initially 
above the upper normal limit, they must normalize for a patient to be considered in complete 
clinical response.  Specific guidelines for both CA-125 response (in recurrent ovarian cancer) 
and PSA response (in recurrent prostate cancer) have been published.  In addition, the 
Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup has developed CA-125 progression criteria which are to be 
integrated with objective tumor assessment for use in first-line trials in ovarian cancer.52 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Cytology, Histology  These techniques can be used to differentiate between partial responses 
(PR) and complete responses (CR) in rare cases (e.g., residual lesions in tumor types, such as 
germ cell tumors, where known residual benign tumors can remain). 
The cytological confirmation of the neoplastic origin of any effusion that appears or worsens 
during treatment when the measurable tumor has met criteria for response or stable disease is 
mandatory to differentiate between response or stable disease (an effusion may be a side effect of 
the treatment) and progressive disease. 
12.1.4 Response Criteria 
12.1.4.1 Evaluation of Target Lesions 
Complete Response (CR):  Disappearance of all target lesions.  Any pathological lymph nodes 
(whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. 
Partial Response (PR):  At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, 
taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 
Progressive Disease (PD):  At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, 
taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the 
smallest on study).  In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an 
absolute increase of at least 5 mm.  (Note:  the appearance of one or more new lesions is also 
considered progressions). 
Stable Disease (SD):  Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to 
qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. 
12.1.4.2 Evaluation of Non-Target Lesions 
Complete Response (CR):  Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor 
marker level.  All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis). 
Note:  If tumor markers are initially above the upper normal limit, they must normalize for a 
patient to be considered in complete clinical response. 
Non-CR/Non-PD:  Persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor 
marker level above the normal limits. 
 
Progressive Disease (PD):  Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal 
progression of existing non-target lesions.  Unequivocal progression should not normally trump 
target lesion status.  It must be representative of overall disease status change, not a single lesion 
increase.     
Although a clear progression of “non-target” lesions only is exceptional, the opinion of the 
treating physician should prevail in such circumstances, and the progression status should be 
confirmed at a later time by the review panel (or Principal Investigator). 
12.1.4.3 Evaluation of Best Overall Response 
The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until 
disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
measurements recorded since the treatment started).  The patient's best response assignment will 
depend on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria. 
For Patients with Measurable Disease (i.e., Target Disease) 
Target 
Lesions 
Non-Target 
Lesions 
New 
Lesions 
Overall 
Response 
Best Overall Response when 
Confirmation is Required* 
CR 
CR 
No 
CR 
>4 wks. Confirmation** 
CR 
Non-CR/Non-
PD 
No 
PR 
>4 wks. Confirmation** 
CR 
Not evaluated 
No 
PR 
PR 
Non-CR/Non-
PD/not 
evaluated 
No 
PR 
SD 
Non-CR/Non-
PD/not 
evaluated 
No 
SD 
Documented at least once >4 
wks. from baseline** 
PD 
Any 
Yes or No 
PD 
no prior SD, PR or CR 
Any 
PD*** 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Yes 
PD 
∗ 
See RECIST 1.1 manuscript for further details on what is evidence of a new lesion. 
**        Only for non-randomized trials with response as primary endpoint. 
***      In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression in non-target lesions may be 
            accepted as disease progression. 
 
Note:  Patients with a global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of 
treatment without objective evidence of disease progression at that time should be 
reported as “symptomatic deterioration.”  Every effort should be made to document the 
objective progression even after discontinuation of treatment. 
 
For Patients with Non-Measurable Disease (i.e., Non-Target Disease) 
Non-Target Lesions 
New Lesions 
Overall Response 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
CR 
No 
CR 
Non-CR/non-PD 
No 
Non-CR/non-PD* 
Not all evaluated 
No 
not evaluated 
Unequivocal PD 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
Yes 
PD 
∗ 
‘Non-CR/non-PD’ is preferred over ‘stable disease’ for non-target disease since SD is 
increasingly used as an endpoint for assessment of efficacy in some trials so to assign 
this category when no lesions can be measured is not advised 
 
12.1.4.4 Duration of Response 
Duration of overall response:  The duration of overall response is measured from the time 
measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that 
recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive 
disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). 
The duration of overall CR is measured from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR 
until the first date that progressive disease is objectively documented. 
 
Duration of stable disease:  Stable disease is measured from the start of the treatment until the 
criteria for progression are met, taking as reference the smallest measurements recorded since the 
treatment started, including the baseline measurements.  
13 HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS  
13.1 RATIONALE FOR SUBJECT SELECTION 
Women from all racial/ethnic groups are eligible for this study if they meet the eligibility criteria. 
To date, there is no information that suggests that differences in drug metabolism or disease 
response would be expected in one group compared to another. Efforts will be made to extend 
accrual to a representative population, but in this preliminary study, a balance must be struck 
between patient safety considerations and limitations on the number of individuals exposed to 
potentially toxic and/or ineffective treatments on the one hand and the need to explore ethnic 
aspects of clinical research on the other hand. If differences in outcome that correlate to ethnic 
identity are noted, accrual may be expanded or a follow-up study may be written to investigate 
those differences more fully.  This study will be recruited through internal referral, our local 
physician referral base, and will be posted on clinicaltrials.gov.   
13.2 PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN 
Subjects under 18 are excluded because the incidence of ovarian cancers including primary 
peritoneal, fallopian tube cancers in this population are extremely rare.  The study medication is 
also investigational and has not been studied in pediatric populations. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Men are excluded because ovarian cancer in males does not exist. 
13.3 EVALUATION OF BENEFITS AND RISKS/DISCOMFORTS 
The potential benefit to a patient who enters study is a reduction in the bulk of her tumor, which 
may or may not have a favorable impact on symptoms and/or survival.  Potential risks include 
the possible occurrence of any of a range of side effects that are listed in Section 7.3.1 and the 
consent document.  The procedure for protecting against or minimizing risks will be to medically 
evaluate patients on a regular basis as described earlier. 
13.4 RISKS/BENEFITS ANALYSIS 
13.4.1 Potential Risks 
13.4.1.1 Risk of serial biopsies: All care will be taken to minimize risks that may be incurred by 
tumor sampling.  However, there are procedure-related risks (such as bleeding, infection 
and visceral injury) that will be explained fully during informed consent. If patients 
suffer any physical injury as a result of the biopsies, immediate medical treatment is 
available at the NIH’s Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.  Although no 
compensation is available, any injury will be fully evaluated and treated in keeping with 
the benefits or care to which patients are entitled under applicable regulations. 
13.4.1.2 Radiation Risks: CT scans will be performed as clinically indicated. CT-guided biopsies 
will also be clinically indicated in most cases. In addition, one mandatory and two 
optional CT-guided biopsies will be performed for research purposes Such “research-
purpose” CT guided biopsies involve exposure to radiation. This radiation exposure is 
not required for medical care and is for research purposes only. The amount of radiation 
received in this study is 0.54 rem which is below the guideline of 5 rem per year 
allowed for research subjects by the NIH Radiation Safety Committee. The average 
person in the United States receives a radiation exposure of 0.3 rem per year from 
natural sources, such as the sun, outer space, and the earth's air and soil. More 
information about radiation is available in the pamphlet, An Introduction to Radiation 
for NIH Research Subjects. 
13.4.1.3  Risk of Treatment:  Details of the risk of drug therapy are detailed in Section 8.1. 
13.5 CONSENT AND ASSENT PROCESS AND DOCUMENTATION 
An associate or principal investigator on the trial will inform patients of the purpose, alternatives, 
treatment plan, research objectives and follow-up of this trial.  The patient will be provided an 
IRB-approved consent for review and signature and his/her questions will be answered.  After a 
decision is made to enroll into the study, a signature will be obtained from the patient at a 
subsequent visit. Original consents will be placed in the Medical Record. 
All patients must have a signed informed consent form and an on-study (confirmation of 
eligibility) form filled out and signed by a participating investigator before entering on study. 
13.5.1 Consent via telephone 
When re-consent is required due to an amendment, the patient can be consented via telephone if 
needed for logistical reasons. The informed consent document will be sent to the subject.  An 
explanation of the study will be provided over the telephone after the subject has had the 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
opportunity to read the consent form.  The subject will sign and date the informed consent. A 
witness to the subject’s signature will sign and date the consent. 
The original informed consent document will be sent back to the consenting investigator who 
will sign and date the consent form with the date the consent was obtained via telephone.   
A fully executed copy will be returned via mail for the subject’s records. 
The informed consent process will be documented on a progress note by the consenting 
investigator and a copy of the informed consent document and note will be kept in the subject’s 
research record 
14 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
14.1 STUDY DESIGN/ENDPOINTS 
The primary objectives of this trial are to establish whether BMN 673 (talazoparib) is able to be 
associated with at least a minimal response rate in patients with gBRCAm-associated ovarian 
cancer that have progressed on PARPi therapy.   
In patients with ovarian cancer who were treated with a PARPi and progressed, the study will be 
conducted using an optimal two-stage phase II trial design53 in order to rule out an unacceptably 
low 5% ORR (p0=0.05) in favor of an improved RR of 25% (p1=0.25). With alpha=0.10 
(probability of accepting a poor treatment=0.10) and beta = 0.10 (probability of rejecting a good 
treatment=0.10), this study will initially enroll 9 patients with RECIST v1.1 measurable disease, 
who have previously been treated with a PARPi alone, and if 0 of the 9 have a response, then no 
further patients will be accrued. If 1 or more of the first 9 patients has a response, then accrual 
would continue until a total of 24 patients have been enrolled. As it may take several weeks to 
determine if a patient has experienced a response, a temporary pause in the accrual to the trial 
may be necessary to ensure that enrollment to the second stage is warranted. If there are 1 to 2 
responses in 24 patients, this would be an uninterestingly low response rate. If there were 3 or 
more responses in 24 patients (12.5%), this would be sufficiently interesting to warrant further 
study in later trials. Under the null hypothesis (5% response rate), the probability of early 
termination is 63.0%. 
If there is at least one response in the first 9 ovarian cancer patients on the trial who were 
previously treated with only a PARPi, then an amendment will be submitted to open a second 
cohort of patients to be evaluated for clinical response consisting of recurrent or metastatic 
ovarian cancer patients with gBRCAm who were previously treated with PARPi combination 
therapy, and progressed. In these patients with ovarian cancer who were treated with PARPi 
combination therapy, and progressed, the study will also be conducted using the same optimal 
two-stage phase II trial design in order to rule out an unacceptably low 5% ORR (p0=0.05) in 
favor of an improved RR of 25% (p1=0.25). That is, with alpha=0.10 (probability of accepting a 
poor treatment=0.10) and beta = 0.10 (probability of rejecting a good treatment=0.10), this arm 
of the study will initially enroll 9 patients with measurable disease, with ovarian cancer who 
have previously been treated with PARPi combination therapy, and if 0 of the 9 have a response, 
then no further patients will be accrued. If 1 or more of the first 9 patients has a response, then 
accrual would continue until a total of 24 patients have been enrolled. As it may take several 
weeks to determine if a patient has experienced a response, a temporary pause in the accrual to 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
the trial may be necessary to ensure that enrollment to the second stage is warranted. If there are 
1 to 2 responses in 24 patients, this would be an uninterestingly low response rate. If there were 3 
or more responses in 24 patients (12.5%), this would be sufficiently interesting to warrant further 
study in later trials. Under the null hypothesis (5% response rate), the probability of early 
termination is 63.0%. 
Toxicity and safety will be monitored in all patients enrolled on this trial and will be tabulated 
according to maximum grade of toxicity of a given type observed per patient. The results will be 
published for all patients as well as separately by type of disease. 
As a secondary endpoint, progression free survival (PFS) will be estimated using a Kaplan-Meier 
curve based on all patients who were evaluated for response. The PFS at selected points will also 
be reported, along with associated 80% and 95% confidence intervals. The median time to 
progression after receiving BMN 673 (talazoparib) will be compared informally to the time to 
progression for the same patients after receiving an initial PARPi exposure. Analysis by type of 
cancer will also be performed. 
Other secondary endpoints will focus on the ability of biomarkers including but not limited to 
53BP1 by RPPA, to be associated with response in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients will be 
divided into groups based on whether they responded (PR+CR) or not, or were progression free 
at 6 months or not, and values of the biomarkers at baseline will be compared between each of 
the groups defined both ways using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Changes in biomarkers from 
baseline will also be compared between the two groups defined both ways, but as a less 
important evaluation. As these will all be considered exploratory analyses, the results will not be 
formally adjusted for any multiple comparisons but will be considered in the context of the 
hypothesis generating nature of the evaluations. In practice, only results with very small p-values 
such as p<0.005 may be interpreted as being potentially statistically significant. Other secondary 
endpoints relating to development of mutations, biochemical changes in the DNA damage repair 
pathways, CTCs or immune subsets will be evaluated in a descriptive fashion. 
14.2  SAMPLE SIZE/ACCRUAL RATE 
It is expected that 10-12 patients per year may enroll onto this trial. In order to have 24 total 
evaluable patients with ovarian cancer who were treated with a PARPi alone, and 24 with PARPi 
combination therapy, if there is a response in the first 9 patients on the PARPi alone cohort. In 
this case, an amendment will be submitted to open the separate cohort for PARPi combination 
cohort. 
It is anticipated that 1-2 years may be required for accrual. To allow for a very small number of 
non-evaluable patients for response (4), the accrual ceiling will be set at 28 patients. 
 
Accrual Targets 
Ethnic Category 
Sex/Gender 
Females 
 
Males 
 
Total 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Hispanic or Latino 
2 
+ 0 
= 2 
Not Hispanic or Latino 
26 
+ 0 
= 26 
Ethnic Category: Total of all subjects 
28  
(A1) 
+ 0  
(B1) 
= 28  
(C1) 
Racial Category 
 
American Indian or Alaskan Native 
0 
+ 0 
= 0 
Asian 
2 
+ 0 
= 2 
Black or African American 
7 
+ 0 
= 7 
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 
0 
+ 0 
= 0 
White 
19 
+ 0 
= 19 
Racial Category: Total of all subjects 
28  
(A2) 
+ 0  
(B2) 
= 28  
(C2) 
 
(A1 = A2) 
 (B1 = B2) 
 (C1 = C2) 
 
Accrual Rate: 
1-2 pts/month 
Total Expected  
Accrual:   
 Min 9  Max 28 
  
 
14.3 REPORTING AND EXCLUSIONS 
14.3.1 Evaluation of Toxicity 
All patients will be evaluable for toxicity from the time of their first treatment with BMN 673 
(talazoparib). 
14.3.2 Evaluation of Response 
All patients included in the study must be assessed for response to treatment, even if there are 
major protocol treatment deviations or if they are ineligible.  Each patient will be assigned one of 
the following categories:  1) complete response, 2) partial response, 3) stable disease, 4) 
progressive disease, 5) early death from malignant disease, 6) early death from toxicity, 7) early 
death because of other cause, or 9) unknown (not assessable, insufficient data).  [Note:  By 
arbitrary convention, category 9 usually designates the “unknown” status of any type of data in a 
clinical database.] 
All of the patients who met the eligibility criteria (with the possible exception of those who 
received no study medication) should be included in the main analysis of the response rate.  
Patients in response categories 4-9 should be considered to have a treatment failure (disease 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
progression).  Thus, an incorrect treatment schedule or drug administration does not result in 
exclusion from the analysis of the response rate.  Precise definitions for categories 4-9 will be 
protocol specific.  
All conclusions should be based on all eligible patients.  Subanalyses may then be performed on 
the basis of a subset of patients, excluding those for whom major protocol deviations have been 
identified (e.g., early death due to other reasons, early discontinuation of treatment, major 
protocol violations, etc.).  However, these subanalyses may not serve as the basis for drawing 
conclusions concerning treatment efficacy, and the reasons for excluding patients from the 
analysis should be clearly reported.  The 95% confidence intervals should also be provided.  
 
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
15 REFERENCES 
1. 
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the 
response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of 
Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. 
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000;92:205-16. 
2. 
Desar IM, Jacobs JH, Hulsbergen-vandeKaa CA, et al. Sorafenib reduces the 
percentage of tumour infiltrating regulatory T cells in renal cell carcinoma patients. International 
journal of cancer Journal international du cancer 2011;129:507-12. 
3. 
Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, et al. BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of 
treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the 
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2654-63. 
4. 
Cass I, Baldwin RL, Varkey T, Moslehi R, Narod SA, Karlan BY. Improved survival 
in women with BRCA-associated ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:2187-95. 
5. 
Lacour RA, Westin SN, Meyer LA, et al. Improved survival in non-Ashkenazi Jewish 
ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:358-
63. 
6. 
Yang D, Khan S, Sun Y, et al. Association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with 
survival, chemotherapy sensitivity, and gene mutator phenotype in patients with ovarian cancer. 
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2011;306:1557-65. 
7. 
Safra T, Borgato L, Nicoletto MO, et al. BRCA mutation status and determinant of 
outcome in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal 
doxorubicin. Molecular cancer therapeutics 2011;10:2000-7. 
8. 
Lee JM, Hays JL, Annunziata CM, et al. Phase I/Ib Study of Olaparib and 
Carboplatin in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation-Associated Breast or Ovarian Cancer With 
Biomarker Analyses. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2014;106. 
9. 
Ang JE, Gourley C, Powell CB, et al. Efficacy of chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 
mutation carrier ovarian cancer in the setting of PARP inhibitor resistance: a multi-institutional 
study. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer 
Research 2013;19:5485-93. 
10. 
Ang JE, Gourley C, Powell B, et al. Efficacy of chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 mutation 
carrier ovarian cancer in the setting of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor resistance: a 
multi-institutional study. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American 
Association for Cancer Research 2013. 
11. 
Markman M, Rothman R, Hakes T, et al. Second-line platinum therapy in patients 
with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:389-93. 
12. 
Markman M, Bookman MA. Second-line treatment of ovarian cancer. The oncologist 
2000;5:26-35. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
13. 
Norquist B, Wurz KA, Pennil CC, et al. Secondary somatic mutations restoring 
BRCA1/2 predict chemotherapy resistance in hereditary ovarian carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 
2011;29:3008-15. 
14. 
Carrassa L, Damia G. Unleashing Chk1 in cancer therapy. Cell Cycle 2011;10:2121-
8. 
15. 
Edwards SL, Brough R, Lord CJ, et al. Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic 
deletion in BRCA2. Nature 2008;451:1111-5. 
16. 
Sakai W, Swisher EM, Karlan BY, et al. Secondary mutations as a mechanism of 
cisplatin resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers. Nature 2008;451:1116-20. 
17. 
Murai J, Huang SY, Das BB, et al. Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by Clinical PARP 
Inhibitors. Cancer research 2012;72:5588-99. 
18. 
Shen Y, Rehman FL, Feng Y, et al. BMN 673, a novel and highly potent PARP1/2 
inhibitor for the treatment of human cancers with DNA repair deficiency. Clinical cancer 
research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2013. 
19. 
Sandhu SK, Schelman WR, Wilding G, et al. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 
inhibitor niraparib (MK4827) in BRCA mutation carriers and patients with sporadic cancer: a 
phase 1 dose-escalation trial. The lancet oncology 2013. 
20. 
Hatanaka A, Yamazoe M, Sale JE, et al. Similar effects of Brca2 truncation and 
Rad51 paralog deficiency on immunoglobulin V gene diversification in DT40 cells support an 
early role for Rad51 paralogs in homologous recombination. Molecular and cellular biology 
2005;25:1124-34. 
21. 
O'Sullivan CC, Moon DH, Kohn EC, Lee JM. Beyond Breast and Ovarian Cancers: 
PARP Inhibitors for BRCA Mutation-Associated and BRCA-Like Solid Tumors. Frontiers in 
oncology 2014;4:42. 
22. 
Johann Sebastian De Bono LAM, Michael Gonzalez, Nicola J. Curtin, Evelyn Wang, 
Joshua W. Henshaw, Manpreet Chadha, Jasgit C. Sachdev, Daniela Matei, Gayle S. Jameson, 
Michael Ong, Bristi Basu, Zev A. Wainberg, Lauren Averett Byers, Rashmi Chugh, Andrew 
Dorr, Stanley B. Kaye, Ramesh K. Ramanathan. First-in-human trial of novel oral PARP 
inhibitor BMN 673 in patients with solid tumors. 
 
. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2580). 
23. 
Zeng-Rong N, Paterson J, Alpert L, Tsao MS, Viallet J, Alaoui-Jamali MA. Elevated 
DNA repair capacity is associated with intrinsic resistance of lung cancer to chemotherapy. 
Cancer research 1995;55:4760-4. 
24. 
Ashworth A. A synthetic lethal therapeutic approach: poly(ADP) ribose polymerase 
inhibitors for the treatment of cancers deficient in DNA double-strand break repair. J Clin Oncol 
2008;26:3785-90. 
25. 
Cardnell RJ, Feng Y, Diao L, et al. Proteomic markers of DNA repair and PI3K 
pathway activation predict response to the PARP inhibitor BMN 673 in small cell lung cancer. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 
2013;19:6322-8. 
26. 
RPPA Core Facility - Functional Proteomics. at 
http://www.mdanderson.org/education-and-research/resources-for-professionals/scientific-
resources/core-facilities-and-services/functional-proteomics-rppa-core/index.html.) 
27. 
Barthelemy C, Henderson CE, Pettmann B. Foxo3a induces motoneuron death 
through the Fas pathway in cooperation with JNK. BMC neuroscience 2004;5:48. 
28. 
Chung YM, Park SH, Tsai WB, et al. FOXO3 signalling links ATM to the p53 
apoptotic pathway following DNA damage. Nature communications 2012;3:1000. 
29. 
Tsai WB, Chung YM, Takahashi Y, Xu Z, Hu MC. Functional interaction between 
FOXO3a and ATM regulates DNA damage response. Nature cell biology 2008;10:460-7. 
30. 
Bouwman P, Aly A, Escandell JM, et al. 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and 
is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nature structural & 
molecular biology 2010;17:688-95. 
31. 
Bunting SF, Callen E, Wong N, et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in 
Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 2010;141:243-54. 
32. 
Callen E, Di Virgilio M, Kruhlak MJ, et al. 53BP1 Mediates Productive and 
Mutagenic DNA Repair through Distinct Phosphoprotein Interactions. Cell 2013. 
33. 
Jaspers JE, Kersbergen A, Boon U, et al. Loss of 53BP1 causes PARP inhibitor 
resistance in Brca1-mutated mouse mammary tumors. Cancer discovery 2013;3:68-81. 
34. 
Wu J, Prindle MJ, Dressler GR, Yu X. PTIP regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA 
damage sites. The Journal of biological chemistry 2009;284:18078-84. 
35. 
Gong Z, Cho YW, Kim JE, Ge K, Chen J. Accumulation of Pax2 transactivation 
domain interaction protein (PTIP) at sites of DNA breaks via RNF8-dependent pathway is 
required for cell survival after DNA damage. The Journal of biological chemistry 
2009;284:7284-93. 
36. 
Jowsey PA, Doherty AJ, Rouse J. Human PTIP facilitates ATM-mediated activation 
of p53 and promotes cellular resistance to ionizing radiation. The Journal of biological chemistry 
2004;279:55562-9. 
37. 
Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA, et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung 
adenocarcinoma. Nature 2008;455:1069-75. 
38. 
Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al. 2006 update of recommendations for 
the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Journal 
of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 
2006;24:3187-205. 
39. 
Pecot CV, Bischoff FZ, Mayer JA, et al. A novel platform for detection of CK+ and 
CK- CTCs. Cancer discovery 2011;1:580-6. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
40. 
Kinders RJ, Hollingshead M, Khin S, et al. Preclinical modeling of a phase 0 clinical 
trial: qualification of a pharmacodynamic assay of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumor 
biopsies of mouse xenografts. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American 
Association for Cancer Research 2008;14:6877-85. 
41. 
Hernan I, Borras E, de Sousa Dias M, et al. Detection of genomic variations in 
BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes by long-range PCR and next-generation sequencing. The Journal of 
molecular diagnostics : JMD 2012;14:286-93. 
42. 
Barber LJ, Sandhu S, Chen L, et al. Secondary mutations in BRCA2 associated with 
clinical resistance to a PARP inhibitor. The Journal of pathology 2013;229:422-9. 
43. 
Zoppoli G, Regairaz M, Leo E, et al. Putative DNA/RNA helicase Schlafen-11 
(SLFN11) sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. Proceedings of the National 
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012;109:15030-5. 
44. 
Murtaza M, Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, et al. Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance 
to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature 2013;497:108-12. 
45. 
Paterlini-Brechot P, Benali NL. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) detection: clinical 
impact and future directions. Cancer letters 2007;253:180-204. 
46. 
Al-Mehdi AB, Tozawa K, Fisher AB, Shientag L, Lee A, Muschel RJ. Intravascular 
origin of metastasis from the proliferation of endothelium-attached tumor cells: a new model for 
metastasis. Nature medicine 2000;6:100-2. 
47. 
Fan T, Zhao Q, Chen JJ, Chen WT, Pearl ML. Clinical significance of circulating 
tumor cells detected by an invasion assay in peripheral blood of patients with ovarian cancer. 
Gynecologic oncology 2009;112:185-91. 
48. 
Jung-Min Lee NG, Min Jung Lee, Jane Trepel, Minshu Yu, and Elise C. Kohn. 
Development of a dual labeled flow cytometric predictive biomarker assay for response to PARP 
inhibitor (PARPi) therapy in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).  
 
. Society of Gynecology Oncology meeting, Tampa, FL 2014. 
49. 
Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. The secret ally: immunostimulation 
by anticancer drugs. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2012;11:215-33. 
50. 
Mantia-Smaldone G, Ronner L, Blair A, et al. The immunomodulatory effects of 
pegylated liposomal doxorubicin are amplified in BRCA1- deficient ovarian tumors and can be 
exploited to improve treatment response in a mouse model. Gynecologic oncology 2014. 
51. 
McAlpine JN, Porter H, Kobel M, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations correlate with 
TP53 abnormalities and presence of immune cell infiltrates in ovarian high-grade serous 
carcinoma. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy 
of Pathology, Inc 2012;25:740-50. 
52. 
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in 
solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). European journal of cancer 2009;45:228-
47. 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
53. 
Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Controlled clinical 
trials 1989;10:1-10. 
 
 
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
16 APPENDICES 
16.1 APPENDIX A: PERFORMANCE STATUS CRITERIA 
ECOG Performance Status Scale 
Karnofsky Performance Scale 
Grade 
Descriptions 
Percent 
Description 
0 
Normal activity.  Fully active, able 
to carry on all pre-disease 
performance without restriction. 
100 
Normal, no complaints, no evidence 
of disease. 
90 
Able to carry on normal activity; 
minor signs or symptoms of disease. 
1 
Symptoms, but ambulatory.  
Restricted in physically strenuous 
activity, but ambulatory and able 
to carry out work of a light or 
sedentary nature (e.g., light 
housework, office work). 
80 
Normal activity with effort; some 
signs or symptoms of disease. 
70 
Cares for self, unable to carry on 
normal activity or to do active work. 
2 
In bed <50% of the time.  
Ambulatory and capable of all 
self-care, but unable to carry out 
any work activities.  Up and about 
more than 50% of waking hours. 
60 
Requires occasional assistance, but 
is able to care for most of his/her 
needs. 
50 
Requires considerable assistance and 
frequent medical care. 
3 
In bed >50% of the time.  Capable 
of only limited self-care, confined 
to bed or chair more than 50% of 
waking hours. 
40 
Disabled, requires special care and 
assistance. 
30 
Severely disabled, hospitalization 
indicated.  Death not imminent. 
4 
100% bedridden.  Completely 
disabled.  Cannot carry on any 
self-care.  Totally confined to bed 
or chair. 
20 
Very sick, hospitalization indicated. 
Death not imminent. 
10 
Moribund, fatal processes 
progressing rapidly. 
5 
Dead. 
0 
Dead. 
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
16.2 APPENDIX B. LABORATORY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE- TISSUE CORE 
COLLECTION 
Lee Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure for Tissue Core Collection-  
Needle Biopsy – Cryopreservation in OCT  
 
Principle:  
Core needle biopsies are used to sample tissue from a specific, defined location. These biopsies 
may consist of normal, pre-malignant and malignant tissue due to the multi-level tissue sample 
that is obtained. This type of sample is ideal for studying the micro-tumor environment.  
Rapid freezing of the sample is required to prevent degradation of the proteins or RNA. Optimal 
Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound is an alcohol polymer that is liquid at room temperature 
and a solid at –20oC. This polymer is used to cryo-protect the tissue and provide a medium for 
cryo-sectioning.  
 
Materials:  
Cryomolds (Sakura Finetek Ca.t # 4728)  
OCT (Sakura Finetek Cat. # 4583)  
Dry ice  
Ultra cold freezer (-700 to -800C)  
Needle: 16 or 18 gauge  
Permanent marker  
Sterile forceps  
Sterile Glass slides  
Aluminum foil or 50ml Falcon tubes  
 
Procedure:  
1. Prepare all supplies prior to the biopsy procedure to avoid delay once the specimen has been 
obtained.  
2. Label the handle and the front surface of the cryomold with the sample or patient’s identifying 
information.  
3. Perform core needle biopsy.  
4. Pick the core from the biopsy needle onto a sterile glass slide.  
5. Fill cryomold about 1/3 full with OCT. Place the cryomold in dry ice to partially freeze the 
OCT. The OCT should be jelly-like, not completely frozen.  

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
6. Carefully lift the core biopsy by both ends with sterile forceps. Do not stretch the biopsy or 
it will break.  
7. Lay the biopsy as straight as possible in the OCT. Once the sample touches the OCT, you 
cannot reposition it or the sample will break apart.  
8. Quickly add OCT on top of the biopsy, completely covering the sample.  
9. Ensure the sample is level and freeze immediately in dry ice.  
10. Store wrapped in aluminum foil or in a 50ml Falcon tube at –70oC.  
 
Note: 
Do not lay the biopsy on frozen OCT and cover it with liquid OCT. The OCT will not fuse and 
will split into two sections when cutting the frozen tissue sections. 
 
Frozen Section Slides 
1. Frozen sections for proteomic analysis should be cut at 5-8um on plain, uncoated glass 
microscope slides. 
2. The tissue section should be placed as close as possible to the center of the slide. Do not place 
the frozen section at the end of the slide. 
3. Two tissue sections from the same biopsy may be placed on the same glass slide if space 
permits. 
4. Do not allow the tissue section to air on the slide. Freeze immediately on dry ice or at –80oC. 
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
 
16.3 APPENDIX C: LABORATORY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE- PLASMA AND BUFFY 
COAT COLLECTION FOR CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA 
Lee Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure for Plasma and Buffy coat collection for 
circulating tumor DNA (modified from Brenton Laboratory SOP at Cancer Research UK 
Cambridge Institute)  
1. Required consumables  
- Two S-Monovette 9ml EDTA tubes (Sarstedt: 02.1066.001)  
- 2ml screw-capped micro-tubes (Sarstedt: 72.694.006)  
- 2ml non-screwcapped Non-Stick RNase-free Microfuge Tubes (Applied Biosystems: 
AM12475)  
- Transfer pipette (Fisher Scientific: 2655116) 
 
2. Recommended procedure for the Plasma collection, processing, storage and transport of 
plasma for ctDNA and/or circulating nucleic acid studies  
 
1.IMPORTANT: Blood samples should be centrifuged as soon as possible after collection to 
avoid fragmentation, degradation and leukocyte lysis. Samples should be spun within 1 hour of 
collection.  
2. Collect blood into EDTA tubes. Label the tube with appropriate Study/Patient Number 
Identifiers. Record the time of collection and whether the blood was drawn using a peripheral 
venous access device (eg. cannula or butterfly) or a central venous access device (CVAD).  
3. After collection, gently invert tubes 8-10 times to mix and leave tubes upright prior to 
centrifugation. As soon as possible, and within 1 hour after collection, centrifuge samples at 
1600g for 10 minutes at room temperature using a “swing out” rotor. (NB. Centrifuge with the 
brake off). Record the time of centrifugation.  
4. Transfer 1ml aliquots of plasma to sterile 2ml micro-tubes (non-screw capped RNase-free 
tubes can be used at this stage).  
 
*  Take care to avoid any buffy coat layer in this step. See “Procedure for the collection of buffy 
coat samples for circulating nucleic acid studies” in section 3 below for separate collection of 
buffy coat for germline DNA.  
 
5. Centrifuge the plasma aliquots in a bench top centrifuge at 14,000rpm for 10 minutes to pellet 
any remaining cellular debris.  
6. Carefully transfer 1ml aliquots of supernatant to sterile 2ml screw-capped micro-tubes, and 
discard the pellet.  
7. Label tubes with appropriate barcode labels as required by the Study. Freeze aliquots in a -
800C freezer in appropriately labeled storage boxes.  
3. Recommended procedure for the collection of Buffy coat samples for ctDNA and/or 
circulating nucleic acid studies 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
1. Following Step 2 in the plasma collection protocol detailed above, carefully transfer the buffy 
coat layer into a separate sterile micro-tube tube using a transfer pipette or standard pipette. It 
may help to use a gentle swirling action to remove the buffy coat layer, taking care to avoid 
plasma and the red blood cell layer wherever possible. 
2. Label tubes with appropriate barcode labels as required by the Study. Freeze aliquots in a -
800C freezer in appropriately labelled storage boxes. 
 
**  Electronically record all appropriate collection details (study and anonymized patient 
identifier), collection date, sample volume, and sample/biorepository identifiers into study log 
records, as defined by study requirements. Record box number/row/column position, and if there 
were any sample handling or quality issues (e.g. if samples were hemolyzed).  
 
 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
16.4 APPENDIX D: PATIENT DRUG ADMINISTRATION DIARY 
Patient Name _________________________________ Study ID __________________ 
Cycle Number ________________ 
1. Please complete one form for each cycle of treatment. 
2. Swallow each capsule whole with a full glass of water, with or without food.  Do not 
chew or open the capsules.  If a capsule is broken and the powder of the capsules gets on 
your skin, wash the exposed area with as much water as necessary.  Inform the study 
doctor or nurse if that occurs.  
3. Record the date and time you took the drugs.  
4. If you miss or vomit the dose, please make a note of this in your diary and contact your 
study doctor or nurse immediately to receive further instructions. 
5. If you have any comments or notice any side effects, please record them in the Comments 
column.  
6. Please bring this form and your bottles of BMN 673 (talazoparib) with when you return 
for your appointments.  
7. In case of errors, please place a single slash mark through the error and initial it. Please 
do not white out any error or scribble it out with ink. Please do not write the correct 
information directly over the error, but on a separate line next to the error. 
 
You will take:      BMN 673 (talazoparib)        Dose: ___________ 
DAY DATE 
TIME  TAKEN COMMENTS (side effects or missed doses) 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 

NCI Protocol #9632 Abbreviated Title: BMN 673, PARPi after PARPi 
Version Date: 08 August 2016 
 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
Number of pills taken: 
Number of pills returned: 
 
Patient Signature:____________________________________/Date:_____________________ 
 
 
Research Staff Signature:______________________________/Date:____________________ 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY 
• 
Adult Patient or 
• Parent, for Minor Patient 
INSTITUTE: 
National Cancer Institute 
STUDY NUMBER: 
15-C-0050 
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: 
Jung-min Lee, M.D. 
STUDY TITLE:  
A phase 2 pilot study of BMN 673 (Talazoparib), an oral PARP inhibitor, in patients 
with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation-associated ovarian cancer who have had prior 
PARP inhibitor treatment 
Continuing Review Approved by the IRB on 11/02/15 
Amendment Approved by the IRB on 10/05/16 (C) 
                    Date posted to web: 10/12/16 
Standard 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY 
• 
Adult Patient or 
• Parent, for Minor Patient 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent (1) 
 
INTRODUCTION
We invite you to take part in a research study at the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
First, we want you to know that: 
Taking part in NIH research is entirely voluntary.  
You may choose not to take part, or you may withdraw from the study at any time.  In 
either case, you will not lose any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled.  However, 
to receive care at the NIH, you must be taking part in a study or be under evaluation for 
study participation. 
You may receive no benefit from taking part.  The research may give us knowledge that 
may help people in the future. 
Second, some people have personal, religious or ethical beliefs that may limit the kinds of 
medical or research treatments they would want to receive (such as blood transfusions).  If you 
have such beliefs, please discuss them with your NIH doctors or research team before you agree 
to the study. 
Now we will describe this research study.  Before you decide to take part, please take as much 
time as you need to ask any questions and discuss this study with anyone at NIH, or with family, 
friends or your personal physician or other health professional.   
 
Why is this study being done? 
The purpose of this study is to test the response to the study drug called BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
in ovarian cancer patients that were born with a BRCA mutation whose disease has gotten worse
on previous treatment with a similar type of drug.  

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 2 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
BMN 673 (talazoparib) is a PARP inhibitor. PARP inhibitors are thought to work by preventing 
DNA repair in tumor cells and trapping PARP into DNA that may cause toxic effects to tumor 
cells.  BMN 673 (talazoparib) is reported to have a greater PARP-DNA trapping activity 
compared with other PARP inhibitors in experimental cancer cells. Also, ovarian cancer patients 
with BRCA mutations tend to have repeat response to platinum-based chemotherapy after they 
progress on a similar platinum-based regimen. It is unknown whether they have second response 
to another PARP inhibitor after they progressed on their first PARP inhibitors. We hope this 
greater PARP-DNA trapping activity yields second benefits in patients that were treated
successfully but progressed on their first PARP inhibitors.  BMN 673 (talazoparib) is an 
experimental drug that has shown some anti-cancer effects against tumor cells in experimental 
animals and in patients with defects in their DNA-repair pathways.  This drug is in the beginning 
stages of being tested in humans. Although we hope this experimental therapy will decrease the 
size of your tumor, we cannot promise or predict the benefits of the treatment at this time. 
You are being asked to take part in this study because you have ovarian cancer. You have 
already been treated with PARP inhibitors and your disease is now growing. People who are not 
in a study are usually treated with standard chemotherapies. Approximately 28 people will take 
part in this study. 
 
What are the study groups? 
All study participants will get the study drug BMN 673 (talazoparib). 
 
How long will I be in this study? 
You will receive the study drug until your disease gets worse or you experience intolerable side 
effects. After you finish receiving treatment, your doctor will continue to watch you for side 
effects and follow your condition for up to 4 weeks. Afterward, the doctor will continue to be in 
touch with you to check on your health by phone every 6 months for up to 3 years. 
 
What extra tests and procedures will I have if I take part in this study? 
Most of the exams, tests, and procedures you will have are part of the usual approach for your 
cancer. However, there are some extra tests, and/or procedures that you will need to have if you 
take part in this study. 
 
Before you begin the study: 
You will need to have the following examinations, tests, or procedures to find out if you can be 
in the study.  Most of these examinations, tests, or procedures are part of your regular cancer care 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 3 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
and may be done by your health care team, even if you do not join the study.  If you have had 
them recently, they may not need to be repeated.  This will be up to your study doctor.  You will 
have the examinations, tests, and procedures listed below to see if you can take part in the study 
(this is called the screening or baseline evaluation).
• Complete medical history. 
• Physical examination: including height, weight, blood pressure, pulse, and temperature. 
• Standard blood tests: (requiring about 1 tablespoon of blood in total), which include 
measurement of your white blood cells, red blood cells, platelets, blood sugar and 
electrolytes, how your liver and kidneys work, and how well your blood clots. 
• EKG:  A test that checks for problems with the electrical activity of your heart. 
• Pregnancy test: A blood test will be done to check for pregnancy in women who are able 
to become pregnant. 
 
During the study: 
If you are accepted and you choose to take part, you will begin receiving BMN 673 (talazoparib).  
You will take BMN 673 (talazoparib) by mouth once per day.  The drug is given in cycles; each 
cycle is 28 days (4 weeks) long.  You can take the drug with or without food.  You will continue 
to take the study drug until your disease gets worse or you experience intolerable side effects. 
 
You will be asked to maintain a diary to document the exact time you took the study drug, and to 
report any side effects you may have.  If you miss or vomit the dose, please make a note of this 
in your diary and contact your team immediately to receive further instructions.  Please bring the 
study diary, pill bottle, and any remaining medication with you to each clinic visit.  
 
You will also have tests and procedures done because you are in the study to see how BMN 673 
(talazoparib) is affecting your body.  This will include repeating some of the imaging studies 
(e.g., CT scans, a computerized x-ray examination) every 8 weeks to find out if your cancer has 
responded.  Descriptions of the tests and procedures that will be performed during the study are 
listed below.  Please see the Study Chart below for more details.   
Clinical Center Visits: We will ask that you come to the Clinical Center at the beginning of 
cycle 1, and weeks 1, 2, and 3 during cycle 1; and at the beginning of week 1 for all other cycles.  
While you are at the Clinical Center we will perform study tests and procedures to see how the 
study drug is affecting your body.  If you develop any side effects, you may be asked to visit 
more often. 
 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 4 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
Standard procedures being done because you are in this study; these may be done more often 
because you are in the study: 
• Clinic visit: to ask how you are feeling and to evaluate you with a physical examination 
during week 1 of cycle 1 and week 1 for all subsequent cycles. 
• Vital signs and physical examinations: will be performed during the clinic visits. 
• Blood tests: Measurement of your white blood cells, red blood cells, platelets, blood 
sugar, electrolytes, and of how your liver and kidneys work will be done during weeks 1-
4 of cycle 1; at the beginning of all subsequent cycles; and additional weeks as needed to 
follow up on any side effects you may develop.  Approximately 1 tablespoon (15 mL) of 
blood will be drawn per visit. 
• CT scans (or other imaging tests):  such as ultrasound (an examination using sound 
waves) or MRI (an examination using magnetic field and radio waves) that detect your 
tumor will be done before the study and every 8 weeks while you are receiving study 
drugs.  This is done so that any benefit of the treatment can be determined, and if your 
cancer is not responding to the treatment, the study team can tell you and discuss other 
treatment options (discussed further below).   
 
Tests and procedures that are either being tested in this study or being done to see how the drug 
is affecting your body: 
• Research blood samples: We will collect blood samples to find out the effects of the 
drug on any tumor cells in the blood.  These blood samples are mandatory and will be 
collected at the beginning of the study, cycle 2, and at disease progression.  Please see the 
study chart for more details.  The total blood for all these tests will be about 6 
tablespoons (95 mL). 
 
• Tumor biopsy: After you are accepted to take part in the study, you will be asked to 
undergo imaging-directed biopsy of your tumor (removal of a small bit of tissue for 
microscopic examination) once before you receive the study drug. This first biopsy is 
mandatory for participation in this study to examine the potential resistance mechanisms 
to PARP inhibitors.  Additionally, you will be asked to undergo two optional biopsies 
after you have taken the drug on day 28 and at disease progression.  We are collecting 
optional biopsy samples to study the effects of BMN 673 (talazoparib) on your tumor.  
Biopsies are an important part of this trial and are done for research purposes.   
Tumor biopsies are only collected by trained personnel.  Biopsies are collected using a 
small needle under imaging guidance (CT, MRI, or ultrasound as deemed appropriate by 
the interventional radiologist performing the biopsy).  Imaging helps the specialized 
radiologist know that the needle has been placed into the tumor mass.   

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 5 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
Common side effects of a biopsy are a small amount of bleeding at the time of the 
procedure, pain at the biopsy site, which can be treated with regular pain medications, 
and bruising. Rarely, an infection can occur which will be managed with antibiotics.  
 
When you are finished taking the drugs 
When you have finished taking BMN 673 (talazoparib), your study doctor will watch you 
carefully for up to 30 days after the last treatment or until another treatment is started.  You will 
need these tests and procedures at that time: 
• Vital signs and a physical examination 
• Blood tests 
• CT scans or other imaging tests such as ultrasound or MRI 
 
You will be followed for 30 days after taking the last dose of study drugs.  We will call you 
between days 27-30 to ask about any side effects that were ongoing when you stopped therapy, 
or any new side effects that might be related to the study therapy.  If you have side effects that 
might be related to the study drugs that have not gotten better after 30 days, we will call you 
every 2 weeks until the side effects have become stable or gotten better.  Afterward, the doctor 
will continue to be in touch with you to check on your health by phone every 6 months for up to 
3 years.  
 
Study Chart 
The study drug is given over 28-day periods of time called cycles.  The chart below and on the 
next page shows what will happen to you during cycle 1 and future cycles after you sign the 
consent form and start the study.  Each cycle is numbered in consecutive order.  The left-hand 
column shows the day in the cycle and the right-hand column shows what will happen on that day. 
 
Day 
What to do and what will happen to you 
Before 
starting 
study drug 
• Check in at the Outpatient Clinic 
• Get routine blood tests 
• Pregnancy test for women who are able to become pregnant 
• Have a history taken of how you feel and undergo a physical examination by a 
Health Care Provider 
• CT scan will be done 
• Tumor biopsy will be taken 
• Blood sample for research will be taken 
Cycle 1,  
• Visit the Clinical Center 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 6 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
Day 
What to do and what will happen to you 
Day 1 
• Have a history taken of how you feel and undergo a physical examination by a 
Health Care Provider  
• Get routine blood tests  
• Begin taking  BMN 673 (talazoparib) by mouth 
• Blood sample for research will be taken  
Cycle 1,  
Day 8 
• Get routine blood tests 
• Continue taking BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
Cycle 1. 
Day 15 
•
Get routine blood tests
• Continue taking  BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
Cycle 1. 
Day 22 
• Get routine blood tests 
• Continue taking  BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
Cycle 2 
and 
onwards,  
Day 1 
• Check in at the Outpatient Clinic 
• Have a history taken of how you feel and undergo a physical examination by a 
Health Care Provider 
• Get routine blood tests 
• CT scan to determine how your tumor is responding to the treatment will be 
done every 2 cycles (8 weeks) 
• Blood sample for research will be taken before taking BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
(before start of cycle 2 day 1 and at disease progression)  
• Continue taking  BMN 673 (talazoparib) 
• Optional tumor biopsies will be taken before start of cycle 2 day 1 and at 
progression 
What tests will be done on my samples? 
Your tissue (tumor and normal tissue) and blood that are collected will be used to look for 
specific changes in your BRCA gene and possibly other genes associated with DNA repair or 
other pathways in tumors.  
This analysis could be used to develop new ways of diagnosing and treating cancer.   In order to 
examine the tumor and normal tissue, we may use several different techniques depending on the 
type of tissue we collect. Also, we will look for changes of DNA damage repair markers, 
circulating tumor cells, and immune cells in the blood. We will study whether these changes link 
to your health outcomes.  
When we are conducting these tests, it is possible that we could identify possible changes in 
other parts of your DNA that are not related to this research. These are known as “incidental 
medical findings.” However, the analyses that we perform in our laboratory are for research 
purposes only; they are not nearly as sensitive as the tests that are performed in a laboratory that 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 7 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
is certified to perform genetic testing. Changes that we observe unrelated to our research may or 
may not be valid.  
Therefore, we do not plan to inform you of the results of testing on your tissue and blood that is 
performed in our research lab. However, in the unlikely event that we discover a finding that is 
believed to be clinically important based on medical standards at the time that we first analyze 
your results, we will, if you agree, contact you.  This could be many years in the future. We will 
ask you to have an additional tube of blood drawn to verify the findings we have seen in our lab. 
If the results are verified, you will be re-contacted and offered a referral to a genetic healthcare 
provider to discuss the results.  
 
[ ] Initials: _______ I DO NOT want to be contacted if incidental findings with potential health 
implications are discovered.  
 
[ ] Initials: _______ I DO want to be contacted if incidental findings with potential health 
implications are discovered. (You will be given a choice to learn or not learn about a genetic 
change that we find).  
 
Release of genetic information 
 
Your privacy is very important to us and we will use many safety measures to protect your 
privacy. However, in spite of all of the safety measures that we will use, we cannot guarantee 
that your identity will never become known. Although your genetic information is unique to you, 
you do share some genetic information with your children, parents, brothers, sisters, and other 
blood relatives. Consequently, it may be possible that genetic information from them could be 
used to help identify you. Similarly, it may be possible that genetic information from you could 
be used to help identify them.  
 
While the databases developed for this project are not open to everyone and also will not contain 
information that is traditionally used to identify you, such as your name, address, telephone 
number, or social security number, people may develop ways in the future that would allow 
someone to link your genetic or medical information in our databases back to you. For example, 
someone could compare information in our databases with information from you (or a blood 
relative) in another database and be able to identify you (or your blood relative). It also is 
possible that there could be violations to the security of the computer systems used to store the 
codes linking your genetic and medical information to you. 
 
Your individual genomic data and health information may be put in a controlled access database. 
This means that only researchers who apply for and get permission to use the information for a 
specific research project will be able to access the information. Your genomic data and health 
information will not be labeled with your name or other information that could be used to 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 8 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
identify you. Researchers approved to access information in the database have agreed not to 
attempt to identify you. 
Although your genetic information is unique to you, you do share some genetic information with 
your children, parents, brothers, sisters, and other blood relatives. Consequently, it may be 
possible that genetic information from them could be used to help identify you. Similarly, it may 
be possible that genetic information from you could be used to help identify them. Patterns of 
genetic variation also can be used by law enforcement agencies to identify a person or his/her 
blood relatives.  
It is possible also that someone could get unauthorized access or break into the system that stores 
information about you. Every precaution will be taken to minimize this risk. There also may be 
other privacy risks that we have not foreseen. There also may be other privacy risks that we have 
not foreseen.  
 
Since some genetic variations can help to predict future health problems for you and your 
relatives, this information might be of interest to health care providers, life insurance companies, 
and others. However, Federal and State laws provide some protections against discrimination 
based on genetic information. For example, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 
(GINA) makes it illegal for health insurance companies, group health plans, and most employers 
to discriminate against you based on your genetic information. However, GINA does not prevent 
companies that sell life insurance, disability insurance, or long-term care insurance from using 
genetic information as a reason to deny coverage or set premiums.  GINA also does not apply to 
members of the United States military, individuals covered by the Indian Health Service, or 
veterans obtaining health care through the Veteran’s Administration. Lastly, GINA does not 
forbid insurance medical underwriting based on your current health status though the Affordable 
Care Act limits consideration of pre-existing conditions by insurers.  
Who else besides the investigators on this study will know the results of my sample testing? 
Once we obtain any of the samples listed above, the investigators take all your personal 
information off those samples and label them with a study code number.  Only the investigators 
on this study know who the sample came from.  The key linking your personal information with 
the code number is kept in a secure computer data base, with access only to the 2-3 research staff 
who will be discussing this study with you.  Once the sample has been labeled with a code, it is 
sent to a variety of NIH laboratories for storage and testing.  No one testing your samples will be 
able to link the results to you personally.  Specimens obtained during your participation in this 
study may be sent for testing to investigators outside of NCI or the NIH.  All samples will be 
coded to protect your privacy and no personal information will be included.  Other investigators 
on this study will have access to limited clinical and biologic data such as age, gender and 
disease status. 
 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 9 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
How long will your samples be stored? 
The samples collected during this study will be stored for as long as the study is open.  When this 
study is closed, we would like to keep the samples for future research.  We will request your 
permission to do so, later in this consent. 
What possible risks can I expect from taking part in this study? 
If you choose to take part in this study, there is a risk that: 
• You may lose time at work or home and spend more time in the hospital or doctor’s 
office than usual 
• You may be asked sensitive or private questions which you normally do not discuss. 
The BMN 673 used in this study may affect how different parts of your body work such as your 
liver, kidneys, heart, and blood. The study doctor will be testing your blood and will let you 
know if changes occur that may affect your health. 
There is also a risk that you could have side effects from the study drug(s)/study approach. 
Here are important points about side effects: 
• The study doctors do not know who will or will not have side effects. 
• Some side effects may go away soon, some may last a long time, or some may never go 
away. 
• Some side effects may interfere with your ability to have children. 
• Some side effects may be serious and may even result in death. 
Here are important points about how you and the study doctor can make side effects less of a 
problem: 
• Tell the study doctor if you notice or feel anything different so they can see if you are 
having a side effect. 
• The study doctor may be able to treat some side effects. 
• The study doctor may adjust the study drugs to try to reduce side effects. 
The tables below show the most common and the most serious side effects that researchers know 
about. There might be other side effects that researchers do not yet know about. If important new 
side effects are found, the study doctor will discuss these with you. 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 10 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
The risks of the study drug, BMN 673 (talazoparib), are as follows: 
 
COMMON, SOME MAY BE SERIOUS   
In 100 people receiving BMN 673, more than 20 and up to 100 may have: 
• 
Nausea  
• 
Tiredness 
OCCASIONAL, SOME MAY BE SERIOUS   
In 100 people receiving BMN 673, from 4 to 20 may have: 
• 
Anemia which may require blood transfusion  
• 
Constipation, diarrhea, vomiting  
• 
Bruising, bleeding  
• 
Dizziness 
• 
Hair loss 
RARE, AND SERIOUS 
In 100 people receiving BMN 673, 3 or fewer may have: 
• 
Infection, especially when white blood cell count is low 
Potential Risks Related to Research-Related Imaging Studies:  
This research study involves exposure to radiation from up to 3 CT scans (used in biopsy 
collections).  This radiation exposure is not required for your medical care and is for research 
purposes only.  The amount of radiation you will receive in this study is 0.54 rem, which is 
below the guideline of 5 rem per year allowed for research subjects by the NIH Radiation Safety 
Committee.  The average person in the United States receives a radiation exposure of 0.3 rem per 
year from natural sources, such as the sun, outer space, and the earth's air and soil.  If you would 
like more information about radiation, please ask the investigator for a copy of the pamphlet, 
“An Introduction to Radiation for NIH Research Subjects.”  While there is no direct evidence 
that the amount of exposure received from participating in this study is harmful, there is indirect 
evidence it may not be completely safe.  There may be a very slight increase in the risk of 
cancer. 
 
While there is no direct evidence that the amount of exposure received from participating in this 
study is harmful, there is indirect evidence it may not be completely safe.  There may be a very 
slight increase in the risk of cancer.  
 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 11 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
Please tell your doctor if you have had any radiation exposure in the past year, either from other 
research studies or from medical tests or care, so we can make sure that you will not receive too 
much radiation.  Radiation exposure includes x-rays taken in radiology departments, cardiac 
catheterization, and fluoroscopy as well as nuclear medicine scans in which radioactive materials 
were injected into your body.  
If you are pregnant you will not be permitted to participate in this research study.   
What possible benefits can I expect from taking part in this study? 
We do not know if you will receive personal, medical benefit from taking part in this study. The 
aim of this study is to see if this experimental treatment will cause your tumors to shrink.  These 
potential benefits could include shrinking of your tumor or lessening of your symptoms, such as 
pain, that are caused by the cancer.  Because there is not much information about the drug’s 
effect on your cancer, we do not know if you will benefit from taking part in this study, although 
the knowledge gained from this study may help others in the future who have cancer.   
Alternative Approaches or Treatments 
What are my other choices if I do not take part in this study? 
If you decide not to take part in this study, you have other choices.  
• Getting treatment or care for your cancer without being in a study 
• Taking part in another study, if one is available 
• Getting comfort care, also called palliative care.  This type of care helps reduce pain, 
tiredness, appetite problems and other problems caused by the cancer.  It does not treat 
the cancer directly.  Instead, it tries to improve how you feel.  Comfort care tries to keep 
you as active and comfortable as possible. 
 
Please talk to your doctor about these and other options. 
 
Can I stop taking part in this study? 
Yes. You can decide to stop at any time. If you decide to stop for any reason, it is important to let 
the study doctor know as soon as possible so you can stop safely. If you stop, you can decide 
whether or not to let the study doctor continue to provide your medical information to the 
organization running the study. 
Your doctor may decide to stop your therapy for the following reasons: 
• if he/she believes that it is in your best interest 
• if your disease comes back during treatment 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 12 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
• if you have side effects from the treatment that your doctor thinks are too severe 
• if new information shows that another treatment would be better for you 
In this case, you will be informed of the reason therapy is being stopped. 
If you decide at any time to withdraw your consent to participate in the trial, we will not collect 
any additional medical information about you. However, according to FDA guidelines, 
information collected on you up to that point may still be provided to the 
manufacturer/Sponsor/collaborators or designated representatives. If you withdraw your consent 
and leave the trial, any samples of yours that have been obtained for the study and stored at the 
NCI can be destroyed upon request. However, any samples and data generated from the samples 
that have already been distributed to other researchers or placed in the research databases cannot
be recalled and destroyed. 
What are the costs of taking part in this study?  
If you choose to take part in the study, the following will apply, in keeping with the NIH policy: 
• 
You will receive study treatment at no charge to you. This may include 
surgery, medicines, laboratory testing, x-rays or scans done at the 
Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH). 
•
The BMN 673 (talazoparib) will be supplied at no charge while you take 
part in this study.  The cost of getting the BMN 673 (talazoparib) ready 
and giving it to you is also provided at no charge.  It is possible that the 
BMN 673 (talazoparib) may not continue to be supplied while you are on 
the study.  Although not likely, if this occurs, your study doctor will talk 
to you about your options.  
• 
There are limited funds available to cover the cost of some tests and 
procedures performed outside the Clinical Center, NIH.  You may have 
to pay for these costs if they are not covered by your insurance company. 
• 
Medicines that are not part of the study treatment will not be provided or 
paid for by the Clinical Center, NIH. 
• 
Once you have completed taking part in the study, medical care will no 
longer be provided by the Clinical Center, NIH. 
 
Who will see my medical information? 
Your privacy is very important to us and the researchers will make every effort to protect it. 
Your information may be given out if required by law. For example, certain states require 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 13 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
doctors to report to health boards if they find a disease like tuberculosis. However, the 
researchers will do their best to make sure that any information that is released will not identify 
you. Some of your health information, and/or information about your specimen, from this study 
will be kept in a central database for research. Your name or contact information will not be put 
in the database. 
There are organizations that may inspect your records. These organizations are required to make 
sure your information is kept private, unless required by law to provide information. Some of 
these organizations are: 
• The study sponsor and qualified representative(s) of any drug company supporting the 
study. 
• The Institutional Review Board, IRB, is a group of people who review the research with 
the goal of protecting the people who take part in the study. 
• The Food and Drug Administration and the National Cancer Institute in the U.S., and 
similar ones if other countries are involved in the study. 
Where can I get more information? 
You may visit the NCI Web site at http://cancer.gov/ for more information about studies or 
general information about cancer. You may also call the NCI Cancer Information Service to get 
the same information at: 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237). 
A description of this clinical trial will be available on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, as required 
by U.S. Law. This Web site will not include information that can identify you. At most, the Web 
site will include a summary of the results. You can search this Web site at any time. 
Conflict of Interest 
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) reviews NIH staff researchers at least yearly for conflicts 
of interest.  This process is detailed in a Protocol Review Guide. You may ask your research 
team for a copy of the Protocol Review Guide or for more information.  Members of the research 
team who do not work for NIH are expected to follow these guidelines but they do not need to 
report their personal finances to the NIH. 
 
Members of the research team working on this study may have up to $15,000 of stock in the 
companies that make products used in this study.  This is allowed under federal rules and is not a 
conflict of interest.  
 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH 2514-1, Consent to Participate in A Clinical Research Study 
NIH 2514-2, Minor Patient’s Assent to Participate In A Clinical Research Study 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 14 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONTINUATION SHEET for either: 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
NIH-2514-2 (10-84) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
The National Institutes of Health and the research team for this study are using BMN 673 
(talazoparib) developed by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., through a joint study with your 
researchers and the company.  This means it is possible that the results of this study could lead to 
payments to NIH scientists and to the NIH.  By law, government scientists are required to 
receive such payments for their inventions.  You will not receive any money from the 
development of BMN 673 (talazoparib).  
Optional Biopsy 
 
This biopsy to be performed is exclusively for research purposes and will not benefit you.  The 
description of the biopsy procedure is provided above. It might help other people in the future.  
Even if you sign "yes" to have the biopsy you can change your mind at any time.  Please read 
each sentence below and think about your choice. After reading each sentence, circle and initial 
the answer that is right for you. The decision to participate in this part of the research is optional, 
and no matter what you decide to do, it will not affect your care.  
 
I agree to have the tumor biopsy for the research tests in this study.  
 
Yes              No               Initials_________ 
Use of Specimens and Data for Future Research 
To advance science, it is helpful for researchers to share information they get from studying 
human samples.  They do this by putting it into one or more scientific databases, where it is 
stored along with information from other studies. A researcher who wants to study the 
information must apply to the database and be approved.  Researchers use specimens and data 
stored in scientific databases to advance science and learn about health and disease.   
We plan to keep some of your specimens and data that we collect and use them for future 
research and share them with other researchers. We will not contact you to ask about each of 
these future uses.  These specimens and data will be stripped of identifiers such as name, address 
or account number, so that they may be used for future research on any topic and shared broadly 
for research purposes. Your specimens and data will be used for research purposes only and will 
not benefit you.  It is also possible that the stored specimens and data may never be used.  
Results of research done on your specimens and data will not be available to you or your doctor.  
It might help people who have cancer and other diseases in the future.   
If you do not want your stored specimens and data used for future research, please contact us in 
writing and let us know that you do not want us to use your specimens and/or data.  Then any 
specimens that have not already been used or shared will be destroyed and your data will not be 
used for future research. However, it may not be possible to withdraw or delete materials or data 
once they have been shared with other researchers. 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY 
• 
Adult Patient or 
• Parent, for Minor Patient 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 15 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLINICAL RESEARCH 
STUDY (Continuation Sheet) 
• 
Adult Patient or 
• Parent, for Minor Patient 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
 
OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 
1. 
Confidentiality.  When results of an NIH research study are reported in medical journals 
or at scientific meetings, the people who take part are not named and identified.  In most cases, 
the NIH will not release any information about your research involvement without your written 
permission.  However, if you sign a release of information form, for example, for an insurance 
company, the NIH will give the insurance company information from your medical record.  This 
information might affect (either favorably or unfavorably) the willingness of the insurance 
company to sell you insurance. 
The Federal Privacy Act protects the confidentiality of your NIH medical records.  However, you 
should know that the Act allows release of some information from your medical record without 
your permission, for example, if it is required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 
members of Congress, law enforcement officials, or authorized hospital accreditation 
organizations. 
2. 
Policy Regarding Research-Related Injuries.  The Clinical Center will provide short-
term medical care for any injury resulting from your participation in research here.  In general, 
no long-term medical care or financial compensation for research-related injuries will be 
provided by the National Institutes of Health, the Clinical Center, or the Federal Government.  
However, you have the right to pursue legal remedy if you believe that your injury justifies such 
action. 
3. 
Payments.  The amount of payment to research volunteers is guided by the National 
Institutes of Health policies.  In general, patients are not paid for taking part in research studies at 
the National Institutes of Health.  Reimbursement of travel and subsistence will be offered 
consistent with NIH guidelines. 
4. 
Problems or Questions.  If you have any problems or questions about this study, or 
about your rights as a research participant, or about any research-related injury, contact the 
Principal Investigator, Jung-min Lee, M.D., Building 10, Room 12N226, Telephone:  301-443-
7735. You may also call the Clinical Center Patient Representative at 301-496-2626. If you have 
any questions about the use of your specimens or data for future research studies, you may also 
contact the Office of the Clinical Director, Telephone:  301-496-4251.  
5. 
Consent Document.  Please keep a copy of this document in case you want to read it 
again. 

MEDICAL RECORD 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY 
• 
Adult Patient or 
• Parent, for Minor Patient 
STUDY NUMBER:  15-C-0050 
CONTINUATION: page 16 of 16 pages 
PATIENT IDENTIFICATION 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLINICAL RESEARCH 
STUDY (Continuation Sheet) 
• 
Adult Patient or 
• Parent, for Minor Patient 
NIH-2514-1 (07-09) 
P.A.:  09-25-0099 
 
File in Section 4:  Protocol Consent 
 
COMPLETE APPROPRIATE ITEM(S) BELOW: 
A. Adult Patient’s Consent 
B. Parent’s Permission for Minor Patient. 
I have read the explanation about this study 
and have been given the opportunity to discuss 
it and to ask questions.  I hereby consent to 
take part in this study. 
I have read the explanation about this study 
and have been given the opportunity to discuss 
it and to ask questions.  I hereby give 
permission for my child to take part in this 
study.   
(Attach NIH 2514-2, Minor’s Assent, if 
applicable.) 
 
  
  
 
 
Signature of Adult Patient/ 
Legal Representative 
Date 
Signature of Parent(s)/ Guardian Date 
 
 
Print Name 
 
 
Print Name 
C. Child’s Verbal Assent (If Applicable)
The information in the above consent was described to my child and my child agrees to 
participate in the study. 
 
  
  
 
Signature of Parent(s)/Guardian 
Date 
Print Name 
THIS CONSENT DOCUMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR USE  
FROM NOVEMBER 02, 2015 THROUGH NOVEMBER 01, 2016.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature of Investigator 
Date 
Signature of Witness 
Date 
 
Print Name 
 
 
Print Name