Identifying Genetic Predictors of Durable Clinical Benefit to Pembrolizumab in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Alone and in Combination With Chemotherapy.
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Sponsor: Columbia University

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
Protocol
Identifying genetic predictors of durable clinical benefit to pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung 
cancer alone and in combination with chemotherapy
NCT02710396
Protocol V21Jun2018

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
2
CUMC IRB#:   
AAAQ5450 
Merck Study Identifier #: 
MISP_52575 
TITLE:  Identifying genetic predictors of durable clinical benefit to pembrolizumab in 
advanced non-small cell lung cancer alone and in combination with chemotherapy. 
Coordinating Center: 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (HICCC) at 
Columbia University Medical Center 
Principal Investigator: 
Naiyer Rizvi, MD 
177 Fort Washington Avenue 
Columbia University Medical Center 
Phone: 646-317-3141 
Fax: 212-305-3035 
Email address: nar2144@cumc.columbia.edu 
Statistician: 
Codruta Chiuzan, PhD 
722 West 168th Street,
6th Floor, Room 651
New York, NY 10032 
Telephone: 212-305-9107 
Email address: cc3780@cumc.columbia.edu 
Regulatory Sponsor: 
Naiyer Rizvi, MD 
Department of Medicine-Hematology & Oncology 
177 Fort Washington Avenue 
New York, NY 10032 
Phone: 646.317.6344 
Funding Source: 
Merck, SU2C Lung Grant, R01CA205426 
Study Agent: 
(Pembrolizumab) MK-3475 
Other Agent: 
 Carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane), pemetrexed 
IND Status: 
IND ####### 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
 
 
 
 
Affiliate Institutions: 
Site Principal Investigator and Contact Information: 
Other Investigators at Site 
Fox Chase Cancer Center 
Principal Investigator:  
Hossein Borghaei, DO 
333 Cottman Ave 
Philadelphia, PA 19111 
215-728-6900  
Hossein.Borghaei@fccc.edu 
 
 
Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone 
Principal Investigator:  
Joshua Sabari, MD 
160 East 34th Street, 9th Floor 
New York, NY 10016 
Joshua.Sabari@nyumc.org 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
Protocol Signature Page 
 
I confirm that I have read this protocol, I understand it, and I will work according to this 
protocol and to the ethical principles stated in the latest version of the Declaration of 
Helsinki, the applicable ICH guidelines for good clinical practices, and the applicable 
federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations relating to the conduct of the protocol. I 
have read and understand the information in the Investigators’ Brochure (or Manufacturer’s 
Brochure) regarding the risks and potential benefits. I will promptly submit the protocol to 
the applicable IRB for review and approval. Once the protocol has been approved by the 
IRB, I understand that any modification made during the course of the study must first be 
approved by the IRB, prior to implementation except when such modification is made to 
remove an immediate hazard to the subject. I certify that I, and the study staff, have received 
the requisite training to conduct this research protocol. I agree to maintain adequate and 
accurate records in accordance with Columbia University and Herbert Irving Comprehensive 
Cancer Center policies, Federal, state and local laws and regulations. I agree to maintain the 
confidentiality of all information received or developed in connection with this protocol. 
 
 
_________________________________                _______________ 
Signature of Principal Investigator  
               Date 
 
 
 
_________________________________                 
Principal Investigator Name (Print) 
 
 
 
 
_________________________________                 
Name of Institution
Instructions to Principal Investigator: Sign and Date this signature page and print your name. 
Return the original, completed and signed to the Clinical Protocol & Data Management Office. 
Retain a copy in the regulatory binder.  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5
Protocol Synopsis  
 
TITLE: Identifying genetic predictors of durable clinical benefit to pembrolizumab in advanced 
:  non-small cell lung cancer alone and in combination with chemotherapy. 
PROTOCOL #: AAAQ5450  
Merck Study Identifier #: MISP_52575. 
Phase II 
METHODOLOGY: This will be a 3-arm, multi-center, open-label, non-randomized biomarker 
trial of pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-naïve, advanced NSCLC.  
STUDY DURATION: 2 years 
STUDY CENTERS: Columbia, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU 
Langone  
The primary objective is to determine if mutation load underlies sensitivity to pembrolizumab 
alone and in combination with chemotherapy.  
# OF SUBJECTS: NSCLC (n=90, 30 per cohort) 
SCHEMA: Patients eligible will include EGFR and ALK wild type, chemotherapy-naïve, 
advanced NSCLC. Patients will receive 1 of 3 arms of treatment per investigator’s choice:  
Cohort 1: single agent pembrolizumab 200 mg IV will be administered every 3 weeks for up to 
2 years.   
Cohort 2: pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 2 years with 2 cycles of nab-
paclitaxel and carboplatin administered with cycles 1 and 2  
Cohort 3 (non-squamous histology): pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 2 
years with 2 cycles of pemetrexed and carboplatin administered with cycles 1 and 2 
 
Archived tumor material obtained by core biopsy or equivalent is required for entry; repeat 
baseline biopsy will be performed if sufficient archived tumor is not available. All cohorts will 
have tumor biopsy performed at ~C2D8. Baseline blood and serial PBMCs, serum and plasma 
for future research will be collected. 
KEY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 
 Treatment naïve EGFR and ALK wild type advanced non-small cell lung cancer 
(NSCLC). 
 Core tumor biopsy, excisional biopsy or resection of tumor at baseline is required if 
sufficient archival tumor material is not available (equivalent to 2 core biopsies or greater). 
If insufficient archived tumor is available, new baseline tumor biopsy is required.  
 Mandatory biopsy at C2D8 (+/- 7 days) is also required.   
 Stereotactic brain radiation therapy to isolated brain metastases is allowed (without 
washout) 
 Subjects with brain metastases previously treated by whole brain radiation therapy may 
participate provided they are clinically stable and are not using steroids for at least 7 days 
prior to trial treatment.   
Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous 
meningitis are excluded.  
STUDY DRUG: Pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, pemetrexed, carboplatin  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
DURATION OF ADMINISTRATION: Up to 2 years 
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY: Per section 15 
 
 
 
1. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................9 
2. STUDY OBJECTIVES .....................................................................................................10 
3. BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................11 
3.1 Mutational landscape and response to immune checkpoint blockade ....11 
3.2 Chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination in NSCLC .................12 
3.3 Dose Selection ........................................................................................13 
4. Investigational Agent ........................................................................................................14 
4.1 Pembrolizumab .......................................................................................14 
4.2 Other agents ............................................................................................14 
5. Study Design .....................................................................................................................14 
6. Subject Selection and Withdrawal ....................................................................................15 
6.1 Inclusion Criteria ....................................................................................15 
6.2 Exclusion Criteria ...................................................................................17 
6.3 Inclusion of Women and Minorities .......................................................18 
6.4 Subject Recruitment ................................................................................18 
6.5 Early Withdrawal of Subjects .................................................................18 
7. REGISTRATION PROCEDURES ..................................................................................19 
7.1 CUMC Research Participant Registration ..............................................19 
7.2 CPDM CUMC Subject Specific Central Registration Procedures: ........20 
8. TREATMENT PLAN .......................................................................................................23 
8.1 Agent Administration..............................................................................23 
8.2 Dose Selection ........................................................................................24 
8.3 Biomarker Research ................................................................................24 
8.4 General Concomitant Medication and Supportive Care Guidelines .......24 
8.5 Duration of Therapy ................................................................................30 
8.6 Duration of Follow Up ............................................................................31 
8.7 Criteria for Removal from Study ............................................................31 
9. DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS ..............................................................31 
9.1 Pembrolizumab .......................................................................................31 
9.2 Carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel ...............................................................33 
9.3 Carboplatin and pemetrexed ...................................................................33 
9.4 Potential Overlapping Toxicities ............................................................33 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7
10. ADVERSE EVENTS:  LIST AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .........................34 
10.1 Adverse  events .....................................................................................34 
10.2 Definitions.............................................................................................34 
10.3 Sponsor Responsibility for Reporting Adverse Events ........................43 
10.4 Recording of Adverse Events ...............................................................44 
10.5 Reporting of Serious Adverse Events ...................................................44 
10.6 Reporting Process .................................................................................45 
11. PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION .......................................................................46 
11.1 Treatment Regimen ...............................................................................46 
11.2 Method for Assigning Subjects to Treatment Groups ..........................47 
11.3 Preparation and Administration of Study Drug ....................................47 
11.4 Subject Compliance Monitoring ...........................................................47 
11.5 Prior and Concomitant Therapy ............................................................47 
11.6 Packaging ..............................................................................................47 
11.7 Blinding of Study Drug .........................................................................48 
11.8 Receiving, Storage, Dispensing and Return .........................................48 
12. STUDY CALENDAR ....................................................................................................49 
12.1 Study  Procedures .................................................................................52 
12.2 Administrative Procedures ....................................................................52 
12.3 Clinical Procedures/Assessments..........................................................54 
12.4 Other Procedures ...................................................................................57 
12.5 Visit Requirements................................................................................57 
13. MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT.....................................................................................58 
13.1 Antitumor Effect – Solid Tumors .........................................................58 
13.2 Duration of Response ............................................................................58 
13.3 Response Review ..................................................................................59 
13.4 Unblinding Procedures..........................................................................59 
13.5 Stopping Rules ......................................................................................59 
14. DATA REPORTING / REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ........................................59 
14.1 Data Collection .....................................................................................59 
14.2 Data Reporting ......................................................................................60 
14.3 Data and Safety Monitoring Committee ...............................................60 
14.4 Quality Control and Quality Assurance ................................................60 
14.5 Confidentiality ......................................................................................62 
14.6 Source Documents ................................................................................62 
14.7 Records Retention .................................................................................62 
14.8 Compliance with Trial Registration and Results Posting 
Requirements .......................................................................................63 
15. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................63 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
15.1 Study Design/Endpoints........................................................................63 
15.2 Size/Accrual Rate..................................................................................64 
15.3 Stratification Factors .............................................................................64 
15.4 Reporting and Exclusions .....................................................................65 
16. Protection of Human Subjects [multi center studies] .....................................................65 
17. Study Finances ................................................................................................................66 
17.1 Conflict of Interest ................................................................................66 
18. Publication Plan ..............................................................................................................66 
19. APPENDICES ................................................................................................................67 
19.1 ECOG Performance Status ...................................................................67 
19.2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0 (CTCAE) ...67 
19.3 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 Criteria 
for Evaluating Response in Solid Tumors ...........................................67 
19.4 Guidelines for Affiliate Institutions in Multicenter Studies .................67 
19.5 Regulatory Documents: ........................................................................68 
19.6 Protocol Deviation/Subject Waiver request for Affiliate Sites: ............69 
19.7 Guidelines for Affiliate Site Monitoring...............................................70 
19.8 Adverse event reporting ........................................................................71 
19.9 Serious Adverse Event Reporting .........................................................71 
19.10 Non-Serious Adverse Event Reporting ................................................72 
19.11 Reporting to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Data and 
Safety Monitoring Committee .............................................................73 
19.12 Guidelines for Processing IND Safety Reports ...................................73 
19.13 Reporting to Hospital Risk Management / Data Reporting .................73 
19.14 Modified CT Imaging Protocols ..........................................................75 
20. REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................77 
 
 
 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9
1. 
INTRODUCTION 
 
Lung cancer is the most common cancer and leading cause of cancer related death 
worldwide, accounting for more than 1.6 million cases and 1.3 million deaths annually [1]. 
For patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most common 
form of lung cancer in the United States, cytotoxic chemotherapy improves outcomes [2, 3] 
but durable disease control is disappointingly rare – fewer than 5% of patients are alive 5 
years later and median survival is ~10 months [4, 5]. Histology-specific chemotherapy [6], 
maintenance chemotherapy [7-11], the addition of bevacizumab [12], and the identification 
of targetable driver oncogenes [13-18] have all improved outcomes, but there remains an 
urgent need for better treatment strategies for the majority of patients with advanced 
NSCLCs. 
 
T-cell checkpoint inhibitors, particularly those targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), 
have recently demonstrated promising activity in NSCLC.  PD-1 is an inhibitory signaling 
receptor expressed on the surface of T cells and negatively regulates T-cell activation [19]. 
Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 antibodies block the interaction of PD-1 
with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, resulting in activation of T cell mediated immune 
responses against tumor cells. This T cell response can be exhausted during cancer 
progression; its restoration with immune checkpoint inhibitor antibodies can lead to dramatic 
and durable anti-tumor responses [20] [21]. The activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors has 
been well established in melanoma [22, 23] however the unexpected activity observed with 
anti-PD-1 antibodies (anti-PD-1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [24] has led to new 
hope for NSCLC.  Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab are now FDA approved in 
the 2nd line setting after platinum based therapy for the treatment of NSCLC. 
Pembrolizumab is also now approved in the first line setting in PD-L1 positive NSCLC based 
on Keynote 24.  Nevertheless, further understanding of response and resistance mechanisms 
of NSCLC is needed; the landmark progression free survival at 6 months and 12 months in 
this enriched subset of NSCLC from Keynote 24 was still only 62% and  ~ 48%, 
respectively. 
 
Further research efforts in the 1st line setting for NSCLC have explored chemotherapy 
combinations.  In a phase 2 randomized trial, patients with chemotherapy-naïve NSCLC 
(unselected for PD-L1 expression) were randomized to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab plus 
carboplatin and pemetrexed every 3 weeks followed by pembrolizumab for 24 months and 
indefinite pemetrexed maintenance therapy, or to 4 cycles of carboplatin and pemetrexed 
alone followed by indefinite pemetrexed maintenance therapy [25]. The response rate was 
55% vs. 29% and the PFS was 13 months vs. 9 months favoring the pembrolizumab arm. 
These data represent proof of concept of potential synergy between chemotherapy and 
immune checkpoint blockade.  
 
However, little is known regarding the intersection of tumor genetics and response to 
combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy and less is known about the biologic effects 
of chemotherapy on the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesize the subset of NSCLC 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10
patients that may be most apt to benefit from immune checkpoint blockade and 
chemotherapy are those with high mutational load.  We do know that the response rate is 
higher in patients that are PD-L1 positive versus negative with chemotherapy and 
immunotherapy suggesting a relationship between the immunogenicity of a tumor and 
response to combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy. 
 
In summary with the multiple therapies potentially being FDA approved in the first line 
setting it is challenging to determine what is the best treatment option based on simply PD-
L1 expression. This biomarker trial exploring single agent pembrolizumab and 2 
chemotherapy regimens will explore this relationship between genetics and response. We 
postulate the response to immune checkpoint blockade in highly mutated NSCLC can be 
induced by a short course of chemotherapy by increasing tumor antigenicity, inducing 
immunogenic cell death, MHC upregulation and reducing tumor-associated macrophages, 
regulatory T-cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells.  
 
This document is a protocol for a human research study. This study is to be conducted 
according to US and international standards of Good Clinical Practice (FDA Title 21 part 312 
and International Conference on Harmonization guidelines), applicable government 
regulations and Columbia University Medical Center institutional research policies and 
procedures.  
 
2. 
STUDY OBJECTIVES 
 
Primary objectives: 
 
 We will determine if mutation load can predict durable clinical benefit (stable 
disease, partial response or complete response > 6 months) with pembrolizumab alone 
or in combination with 2 cycles of chemotherapy in patients with chemotherapy-
naïve, advanced NSCLC.  
Secondary objective 
 
 If  we identify an optimal threshold of mutation load that predicts durable clinical 
benefit to pembrolizumab, we will determine whether the addition of an abbreviated 
course of chemotherapy can improve responses at a similar or lower mutation 
threshold. 
 
Exploratory Objectives 
 We will characterize the genetic and immune microenvironment pre- and post-
treatment after 2 cycles of pembrolizumab as single agent or in combination with 
chemotherapy.  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
 We will determine if neoantigen-specific T-cells can be detected in peripheral blood 
after treatment with pembrolizumab as single agent or in combination with 
chemotherapy 
 
3. BACKGROUND 
 
3.1 
Mutational landscape and response to immune checkpoint blockade  
Somatic mutations leading to cancer are related to endogenous or exogenous DNA damaging 
processes. The resultant mutations can be separated into two categories – (i) mutations that 
provide selective advantage for clonal expansion and (ii) mutations that do not result in 
growth advantage  [26]. The latter have been termed passenger mutations, while the former 
are referred to as driver mutations. It is widely believed that the number of driver mutations 
in a cancer sample is limited to a handful, usually two or more but less than ten [27]. In 
contrast, the genome of a cancer can harbour more than a million somatic mutations [28] 
most of which are considered to be passengers.  
Several studies have shown that these “passenger” mutations may not be oncogenic drivers 
but may be of importance in adaptive immune resistance of a tumor. In particular the relevant 
mutations are likely to be the nonsynonymous exonic mutations in tumors; these may give 
rise to novel proteins that differ from their wild type counterparts and are immunogenically 
more relevant (reviewed in [29]).  These mutated proteins are proteosomally degraded into 
peptide sequences and presented in complex with MHC molecules on the cell surface as 
“neoantigens”. In preclinical models these neoantigens can drive tumor-specific T-cell 
recognition and tumor rejection in preclinical models [30-33. However tumors can evade the 
host anti-tumor T-cell response through a number of escape mechanisms, including 
downregulation of MHC expression and antigen presentation, secretion of anti-inflammatory 
cytokines, and upregulation of inhibitory ligands such as PD-1. Restoration of T cell 
recognition and rejection with anti-PD-1 antibodies has revolutionized cancer therapy 
however the antigenic “drivers” of immune resistance is not well understood.  Our first clue 
that the genetic complexity of a tumor may underlie responsive to immune checkpoint 
blockade came from observational data showing a greater response rate in tumors that were 
more highly mutated. 
This was more formally evaluated in melanoma [34] and MSI high colon cancer [35] 
showing a correlation between mutational load and benefit to immune checkpoint blockade . 
In NSCLC, the first evidence that the mutation landscape correlates with DCB to 
pembrolizumab has also been demonstrated [36]. Tumors with higher nonsynonymous 
mutation load exhibited improved objective response to pembrolizumab (59% vs. 12%, 
p=0.01), durable clinical benefit (DCB) (79% vs. 18%, p=0.0011), and PFS (median NR vs. 
3.4 months, p=0.0004). Notably, analysis within this paper suggests that mutation load was 
able to differentiate between responders and non-responders within a PD-L1 positive group 
(Table 1). 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12
 
Table 1 
High mutation load 
Low mutation load 
PD-L1 positive (n=11) 
PD-L1 positive (n=10) 
Durable clinical benefit 
91% 
10% 
No durable benefit 
9% 
90% 
 
In contrast, we also observed PD-L1 negative tumors with high mutation load that did not 
respond to immune checkpoint blockade; one explanation we postulated was tumor 
heterogeneity may explain this lack of response in highly mutated NSCLC. However, a host 
of other mechanisms of immune escape exist including defects in antigen presentation, 
secretion of inhibitory molecules (TGF-β, IL-10), induction of metabolic enzymes that 
consume tryptophan and produce immune-inhibitory metabolites (IDO, TDO), recruitment of 
tolerogenic immature dendritic cells (DCs), myeloid derived-suppressor cells (MDSCs) or  
(inducible) regulatory CD4+ T-cells.  Potentially these highly mutated, PD-L1 negative 
tumors may respond to immune checkpoint blockade with a short course of chemotherapy to 
counteract these other mechanisms of immune evasion.  
 
3.2 
Chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination in NSCLC 
 
Chemotherapy can promote immunogenic cell death (ICD) of tumor cells. ICD results in the 
release of tumor antigens and “danger signals,” also known as damage-associated molecular 
patterns (DAMPS), such as calreticulin, ATP, type I IFN, and non-histone chromatin-binding 
protein high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) [37, 38]. Binding to their receptors (CD91, the 
purinergic receptors P2RX7 and P2RY2, IFNAR, and the toll-like receptor TLR4, 
respectively) on DCs, results in their activation, enhanced antigen presentation, upregulation 
of co-stimulatory receptors, and induction of adaptive immune responses, whereas cell death 
that is “immunologically silent” induces tolerance [38, 39].  
 
In a phase 2 randomized trial, patients with chemotherapy naïve NSCLC (unselected for PD-
L1 expression) were randomized to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and 
pemetrexed every 3 weeks followed by pembrolizumab for 24 months and indefinite 
pemetrexed maintenance therapy, or to 4 cycles of carboplatin and pemetrexed alone 
followed by indefinite pemetrexed maintenance therapy[25].  The response rate was 55% vs. 
29% and the PFS was 13 months vs. 9 months favoring the pembrolizumab arm. Multiple 
phase 3 trials are now being conducted combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint 
blockade in NSCLC with little understanding of the interaction between chemotherapy and 
immunotherapy and impact of PD-L1 expression or mutational landscape.  
 
The combination of atezolizumab with carboplatin based chemotherapy was evaluated in 37 
patients with advanced NSCLC in the phase Ib GP28328. MPDL3280A was added to 
carboplatin with either paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or pemetrexed [40]. The ORR for the 
carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel arm was 62% (33-83%) with 6 PRs and 2 CRs. Responses 
were seen independent of PD-L1 expression. 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13
Although the randomized phase 2 and ongoing phase 3 trial with pembrolizumab and 
pemetrexed and carboplatin are promising, pemetrexed is not a known inducer of 
immunogenic cell death and continuous chemotherapy administration may have deleterious 
effect on T cell responses [41]. Also not clear is the potential negative effects of steroid pre 
and post treatment. Taxanes on the other hand are known to have multiple favorable effects 
on the tumor microenvironment (TME). Paclitaxel specifically impairs cytokine production 
and viability in FOXP3+ Treg cells but not in FOXP−CD4+ effector cells, stimulates antigen 
presentation by DCs, and increases the permeability of tumour cells to granzyme B [41]. 
Nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin is an FDA approved chemotherapy doublet used in the first-line 
treatment of advanced NSCLC [42]. Importantly, this regimen can be administered without 
any corticosteroid administration.  
 
In summary, chemotherapy can increase the antigenicity by inducing immunogenic cell death 
and MHC upregulation but can also reduce “off target” immunosuppression within the TME 
by reducing tumor-associated macrophages, regulatory T-cells and MSDCs. Additionally, 
chemotherapy is capable of enhancing cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. We 
hypothesize that a short course of chemotherapy can increase T-cell recognition of 
neoantigens by both increasing antigenicity as well as reducing immune suppression in the 
TME.  
 
3.3 
Dose Selection  
Pembrolizumab administered at a flat dose of 200 mg IV every 3 weeks is a dose and 
schedule approved by the FDA for use in NSCLC. It is approved first line in PD-L1 positive 
NSCLC with a 50% threshold and in the 2nd line NSCLC setting with a 1% threshold.  
Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8 and 15 and carboplatin AUC 5 
administered on Day 1 every 3 weeks are approved in combination as first line treatment of 
NSCLC. 
Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 administered on Day 1 every 3 weeks is 
approved in combination as first line treatment of non-squamous cell lung cancer. 
 
Both chemotherapy regimens will be administered without corticosteroids unless deemed 
necessary by the treating physician. 
 
NOTE: For patients with an abnormally low serum creatinine level, estimate GFR using a 
minimum creatinine level of 0.8 mg/dL or cap the estimated GFR at 125 mL/min. If a 
patient’s GFR is estimated based on serum creatinine measurements by the isotope dilution 
mass spectroscopy method, the FDA recommends that physicians consider capping the dose 
of carboplatin for desired exposure (AUC) to avoid potential toxicity due to overdosing. 
Based on the Calvert formula described in the carboplatin label, the maximum doses can be 
calculated as follows:  
 
Maximum carboplatin dose (mg) = target AUC (mg •min/mL) × (GFR+ 25 mL/min)  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14
The maximum dose is based on a GFR estimate that is capped at 150 mL/min for patients 
with normal renal function. No higher estimated GFR values should be used. 
 
For a target AUC= 6, the maximum dose is 6 × 150 = 900 mg.  
For a target AUC= 5, the maximum dose is 5 × 150 = 750 mg.  
For a target AUC= 4, the maximum dose is 4 × 150 = 600 mg. 
 
4. INVESTIGATIONAL AGENT 
 
4.1 
Pembrolizumab 
Refer to the Investigator’s Brochure for Preclinical and Clinical data. 
 
4.2 
Other agents 
 
Nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin is an FDA approved chemotherapy doublet used in the first-line 
treatment of advanced NSCLC. Pemetrexed + carboplatin is an FDA approved chemotherapy 
doublet used in the first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous cell lung cancer. Refer to 
the approved product labels for further information. 
 
5. STUDY DESIGN 
 
This will be a 3-arm, multi-center, open-label, non-randomized biomarker trial in patients 
with advanced, treatment-naive NSCLC. Patients will receive 1 of 3 possible cohorts as per 
investigator’s discretion. Patients with non-squamous histology may receive any of the 3 
cohorts; patients with squamous histology may receive either cohorts 1 and 2.  
 
Table 2: Schema 
 
Cohort 1  
(Any NSCLC histology) 
Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q 3 weeks x 2 years 
 
Cohort 2 
Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q 3 weeks x 2 years 
(Any NSCLC histology) 
Nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 D 1, 8 and 15) x 2 cycles 
 
Carboplatin (AUC 5 q 3 weeks) x 2 cycles 
 
 
Cohort 3 
Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q 3 weeks x 2 years 
(non-squamous histology only) 
Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 x 2 cycles 
 
Carboplatin (AUC 5 q 3 weeks) x 2 cycles 
 
If sufficient archived core biopsy is available (at least 2 cores or equivalent) a pretreatment 
biopsy will not be required after review of the pathology report and approval by the medical 
monitor. If insufficient archived tumor is available a new tumor biopsy will be performed. 
An on treatment biopsy will be performed at approximately C2D8. New tumor biopsies will 
be procured as follows: a total of 5 core biopsies at each time point will be collected. Four 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15
samples will be embedded in OCT, snap frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen or at -80°C for 
DNA and RNA extraction. The remaining core biopsy will be formalin-fixed and embedded 
in paraffin. Baseline blood will be obtained and serial PBMCs, serum and plasma will be 
banked for future research: pre-treatment (either screening or C1D1), C1D8, C2D1, C2D8, 
C3D1, every 4 cycles thereafter (every 12 weeks) and at progression.  
 
6. SUBJECT SELECTION AND WITHDRAWAL 
 
6.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
 
6.1.1 
NSCLC patients of all histologies may enroll to Cohorts 1 and 2.  Only patients of 
non-squamous histologies may enroll to Cohort 3. If enrollment to a cohort is 
completed, enrollment may continue to other open cohorts. 
6.1.2 
Be willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial. 
6.1.3 
Chemotherapy naïve NSCLC patients.For NSCLC patients with lung 
adenocarcinoma, tumors must be EGFR and ALK wild-type; if a KRAS mutation is 
detected, EGFR and ALK testing is not required.  
6.1.4 
Diagnosis must be documented by histology or cytology from brushings, washings, 
or needle aspiration of a defined lesion but not from sputum cytology. 
6.1.5 
Be  18 years of age on day of signing informed consent. 
6.1.6 
Have measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1. 
 
6.1.7 
Sufficient archived tumor material available (equivalent to 2 core biopsies or 
greater); if insufficient archived tumor material available new tumor biopsy is 
mandatory.  
6.1.8 
Have a performance status of 0 or 1 on the ECOG Performance Scale. 
6.1.9 
Demonstrate adequate organ function as defined in Table 3 below. All screening labs 
should be performed within 10 days of treatment initiation, except for Hepatitis B, 
Hepatitis C, and HIV, which may be done within 28 days of treatment initiation. 
 
Table 3: Adequate Organ Function Laboratory Values 
 
System 
Laboratory Value 
Hematological 
 
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 
≥1,500 /mcL 
Platelets 
≥100,000 / mcL 
Hemoglobin 
≥9 g/dL or ≥5.6 mmol/L  
Renal 
 
Serum creatinine OR 
Measured or calculateda creatinine 
clearance 
(GFR can also be used in place of 
creatinine or CrCl) 
≤1.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN) OR 
 
≥60 mL/min for subject with creatinine levels > 1.5 X institutional 
ULN 
Hepatic 
 
Serum total bilirubin 
≤ 1.5 X ULN OR 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16
 
Direct bilirubin ≤ ULN for subjects with total bilirubin levels > 1.5 
ULN 
AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) 
≤ 2.5 X ULN  OR 
≤ 5 X ULN for subjects with liver metastases 
Coagulation 
International Normalized Ratio 
(INR) or Prothrombin Time (PT) 
 
Activated Partial Thromboplastin 
Time (aPTT) 
≤1.5 X ULN unless subject is receiving anticoagulant therapy 
as long as PT or PTT is within therapeutic range of intended use of 
anticoagulants 
≤1.5 X ULN unless subject is receiving anticoagulant therapy 
as long as PT or PTT is within therapeutic range of intended use of 
anticoagulants 
aCreatinine clearance should be calculated per institutional standard. 
 
6.1.10 Female subject of childbearing potential should have a negative urine or serum 
pregnancy within 72 hours prior to receiving the first dose of study medication. If 
the urine test is positive or cannot be confirmed as negative, a serum pregnancy test 
will be required. 
6.1.11 Female subjects of childbearing potential should be willing to use 2 methods of birth 
control or be surgically sterile, or abstain from heterosexual activity for the course of 
the study through 120 days after the last dose of study medication (Section 8.4.4).  
Subjects of childbearing potential are those who have not been surgically sterilized 
or have not been free from menses for > 1 year. 
 
6.1.12 Male subjects should agree to use an adequate method of contraception starting with 
the first dose of study therapy through 120 days after the last dose of study therapy. 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17
6.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
 
6.2.1 
Is currently participating in or has participated in a study of an investigational agent 
or using an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of treatment.  
6.2.2 
Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving systemic steroid therapy or any 
other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of trial 
treatment.  
6.2.3 
Has had a prior anti-cancer monoclonal antibody within 4 weeks prior to study Day 
1 or who has not recovered (i.e., ≤ Grade 1 or at baseline) from adverse events due to 
agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier. 
6.2.4 
Has had prior chemotherapy, targeted small molecule therapy, or radiation therapy 
within 2 weeks prior to study Day 1 or who has not recovered (i.e., ≤ Grade 1 or at 
baseline) from adverse events due to a previously administered agent. 
6.2.5 
If subject received major surgery, they must have recovered adequately from the 
toxicity and/or complications from the intervention prior to starting therapy.  
6.2.6 
Has a known additional malignancy that is progressing or requires active treatment.  
Exceptions include basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the 
skin, or in situ cervical cancer that has undergone potentially curative therapy.   
6.2.7 
Has known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous 
meningitis.  Subjects with previously treated brain metastases may participate 
provided they are clinically stable and are not using steroids for at least 7 days prior 
to trial treatment (stereotactic brain radiation therapy to isolated brain metastases 
does not require washout period providing no steroids are required). 
6.2.8 
Has active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 
years (i.e. with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids or 
immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (eg., thyroxine, insulin, or 
physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency, 
etc.) is not considered a form of systemic treatment. 
6.2.9 
Has evidence of interstitial lung disease or active, non-infectious pneumonitis. Has 
an active infection requiring systemic therapy. 
6.2.10 Has a history or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory 
abnormality that might confound the results of the trial, interfere with the subject’s 
participation for the full duration of the trial, or is not in the best interest of the 
subject to participate, in the opinion of the treating investigator. 
6.2.11 Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with 
cooperation with the requirements of the trial. 
6.2.12 Is pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the 
projected duration of the trial, starting with the pre-screening or screening visit 
through 120 days after the last dose of trial treatment. 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18
6.2.13 Has received prior therapy with an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, 
or anti-Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibody (including 
ipilimumab or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation 
or checkpoint pathways). 
6.2.14 Has a known history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (HIV 1/2 
antibodies). 
6.2.15 Has known active Hepatitis B (e.g., HBsAg reactive) or Hepatitis C (e.g., HCV RNA 
[qualitative] is detected). 
6.2.16 Has a known history of active TB (Bacillus Tuberculosis) 
6.2.17 Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment. 
6.2.18 History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the treatment.  
 
6.3 
Inclusion of Women and Minorities 
 
Both men and women of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this trial. 
 
6.4 
Subject Recruitment  
 
Patients will be recruited from the referral population within the investigator and co-
investigators’ clinical practices.  
 
6.5 
Early Withdrawal of Subjects     
 
6.5.1 When and How to Withdraw Subjects 
 
Subjects may withdraw consent at any time for any reason or be dropped from the trial at the 
discretion of the investigator should any untoward effect occur.  In addition, a subject may be 
withdrawn by the investigator or the Sponsor if enrollment into the trial is inappropriate, the 
trial plan is violated, or for administrative and/or other safety reasons.  Specific details 
regarding discontinuation or withdrawal are provided in Section 12.4. 
 
A subject must be discontinued from the trial for any of the following reasons: 
 
 
The subject or legal representative (such as a parent or legal guardian) 
withdraws consent. 
 
Confirmed radiographic disease progression 
o Note: For unconfirmed radiographic disease progression, please see Section 
13. 
o Note: A subject may be granted an exception to continue on treatment with 
confirmed radiographic progression if clinically stable or clinically improved. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19
 
Unacceptable adverse experiences as described in Section 10. 
 
Intercurrent illness that prevents further administration of treatment 
 
 
Investigator’s decision to withdraw the subject 
 
The subject has a confirmed positive serum pregnancy test 
 
Noncompliance with trial treatment or procedure requirements 
 
The subject is lost to follow-up 
 
Administrative reasons 
 
6.5.2 Data Collection and Follow-up for Withdrawn Subjects 
 
The End of Treatment and Follow-up visit procedures are listed in Section 12 (Protocol Flow 
Chart) and Section 12.5 (Visit Requirements).  After the end of treatment, each subject will 
be followed for 30 days for adverse event monitoring (serious adverse events will be 
collected for 90 days after the end of treatment as described in Section 12.5.2.  Subjects who 
discontinue for reasons other than progressive disease will have post-treatment follow-up for 
disease status until disease progression, initiating a non-study cancer treatment, withdrawing 
consent or becoming lost to follow-up.  After documented disease progression each subject 
will be followed by telephone for overall survival until death, withdrawal of consent, or the 
end of the study, whichever occurs first. 
 
7. REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
 
7.1 
CUMC Research Participant Registration  
 
Confirm eligibility as defined in the section entitled Criteria for Subject Eligibility. 
 
Obtain informed consent, by following procedures defined in section entitled Informed 
Consent Procedures, along with applicable institutional policies and federal regulations. 
 
Only Investigators/Research personnel properly trained and delegated to consent subjects for 
this protocol will participate in the consenting process. Furthermore, properly 
delegated/trained Physician Investigators (e.g., MD, MD PhD) are required to sign/verify a 
protocol specific Eligibility Checklist for each subject enrolled on the study, in addition to 
providing the relevant source documentation confirmation subject eligibility. 
 
All participants must be centrally registered through the Central Registration Office 
within Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at CUMC prior to initiation of 
study treatment. 
 
Registration hours are available Monday through Friday from 9:00am – 5:00pm EST 
(excluding holidays and weekends). Same day patient registrations (and after hour 
registrations) will be accommodated on a case by case basis provided that the study team has 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20
expressed all time sensitive registration concerns/cases in a timely manner to the Central 
Registration Office.  
 
7.2 
CPDM CUMC Subject Specific Central Registration Procedures: 
 
Within 48 hours of obtaining consent (excluding holidays and weekends), a 
completed/signed IRB approved informed consent HIPAA form, and demographics forms 
must be submitted to the CPDM Central Registration Office via an email to 
CPDMRegistration@cumc.columbia.edu or fax to 212.304.6330, with the subject line 
“AAAQ5450 Pending Subject Registration Request (PHI)”.  Upon receipt, applicable subject 
information as well as a “pending eligibility” status will be entered into HICCC’s 
institutional database.  This status will remain until further source documentation is made 
available to confirm overall patient eligibility. Required materials for all pending registration 
submissions are as follows: 
 Completed/signed IRB approved/stamped Informed Consent Forms, including 
additional study ICFs (e.g., tissue, DNA, etc.), as applicable. 
 The completed/signed IRB approved HIPAA Authorization form 
 Completed/signed CPDM ICF checklist 
 Completed/signed HICCC personal census form 
 Completed/signed CPDM Demographics Note to File 
 
In order to confirm eligibility status, Investigators/designees (e.g., study specific Clinical 
Research Coordinator/Research Nurse, etc.) must submit the following documentation to the 
Central Registration Office via email or fax: 
 The completed/signed study specific Eligibility Checklist  (signed by an Physician 
level Investigator) 
 Copies of source documentation necessary for each item to be verified on the CPDM 
specific Eligibility Checklist, including but not limited to: 
 Copy of required laboratory test and procedure reports (e.g., hematology, serum 
chemistry, pregnancy test when applicable, MRI reports, CT/bone scans, etc.) 
 Copy of pathology and surgical reports 
 Copy of clinic note(s) or other appropriate medical records capturing the consent 
process information, along with providing source documentation of any other items 
needed for screening/eligibility that are not captured in other source document forms 
(e.g., positive investigator statements of unique eligibility items not captured via other 
direct source documentation, concomitant medication lists, etc.) 
 Protocol deviation/waiver approvals (if applicable) 
 
 
Please note: subject line of email or fax should include the following: “AAAQ5450” 
Complete Subject Registration Request (PHI)”. 
Upon receipt of the above mentioned documentation, participant eligibility information will 
be verified by a qualified Central Registration Registrar. If any questions arise during the 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21
review process, queries in the form of emails will be addressed to the applicable study team 
personnel for clarification prior to enrollment. .All applicable finalized registration/eligibility 
information will then be entered into HICCC’s institutional CTMS database by the Central 
Registration Registrar.  Upon completion, an official subject registration notification email 
will be sent to the PI/research team which will include eligibility/enrollment status, as well as 
subject ID information.  Protocol therapy may not be initiated prior to receipt of this 
notification from the Central Registration Office. 
 
All screen fail/ineligible subjects, as well as subject’s who withdraw consent prior to 
enrollment/initiation of protocol therapy must be submitted to the Central Registration office 
in a manner analogous to the procedures noted above. Applicable source documentation will 
be required within the corresponding submissions. 
 
7.2.1 
Central Registration Procedures- Affiliate Institution Research Participant 
Registration Process:  
 
Affiliate Institutions will be trained during the SIV teleconference prior to activating the site. 
Once sites begin enrolling subjects, teleconferences will be scheduled every two weeks to 
discuss enrollment, safety and on-going study education 
 
All Affiliate Institutions must register subjects with the coordinating center (CUMC) prior 
to any administration of study drug/intervention/local institution registration.  Please see 
instructions below: 
 
1. Within 48 hours of obtaining consent (excluding holidays and weekends), the 
Affiliate Institution CRN and/or CRC is required to submit the following documents 
to the coordinating center’s designee (CUMC’s study specific Clinical Research 
Coordinator or Clinical Research Nurse) via the Q5450@columbia.edu email.   
2. The coordinating center’s designee will review the documents for accurateness, and 
subsequently submit the documents to the CPDM Central Registration Office via 
email at CPDMRegistration@columbia.edu (or via fax at 212.305.5292), with a 
request to register the patient “pending eligibility.” The title of the email should read, 
“AAAQ5450 Pending Subject Registration Request (PHI)”.  The following 
documents should be submitted with the pending registration request, as applicable: 
a. Redacted Completed/signed IRB approved/stamped Informed Consent Forms, 
including additional study ICFs (e.g., tissue, DNA, etc.), as applicable 
b. Redacted Signed HIPAA (or institutional equivalent) 
c. MCT CPDM Velos Note to File form  
 
3. The Affiliate Institution’s investigator/research nurse/data manager/coordinator must 
contact the coordinating center’s designee (CUMC’s study specific Clinical Research 
Coordinator or Clinical Research Nurse) via telephone or email to communicate the 
following: 
 Notify of pending registration request  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22
 Confirm method of registration request submission (email or fax) 
 Communicate expected time-line of registration request submission (e.g., same day, 
next day, within the hour, etc.) 
 
4. To complete registration, the Affiliate Institution’s investigator/research nurse/data 
manager/coordinator should then submit the following documents to the CUMC study 
specific designee via the Q5450@columbia.edu email: 
 A signed Affiliate Site Eligibility Checklist (signed by the investigator) 
 Copies of redacted source documentation necessary for each item to be verified on 
the CUMC specific Eligibility Checklist, including but not limited to: 
o Copy of required laboratory test and procedure reports (e.g., hematology, 
serum chemistry, pregnancy test when applicable, MRI reports, CT/bone 
scans, etc.) 
o Copy of pathology and surgical reports 
o Copy of clinic note(s) capturing the consent process information, along with 
providing source documentation of any other items needed for 
screening/eligibility that are not captured in other source document forms. 
(e.g., positive investigator statements of unique eligibility items not captured 
via other direct source documentation, concomitant medication lists, etc.) 
 Please note: subject line of email or fax should include the following: “AAAQ5450 
Complete Subject Registration Request (PHI)”. 
 
5. Upon receipt of the above mentioned documents, the designated study specific Clinical 
Research Coordinator will review all documents and verify patient eligibility.  If any 
questions arise during the review process, queries in the form of emails will be 
addressed to the applicable affiliate site study team personnel for clarification prior to 
enrollment.  Upon verification, the CUMC study specific designee will then forward all 
documents to the CPDM Central Registration Office for central registration (as 
described above). The CPDM Central Registration Registrar will review all applicable 
documents and communicate to the CUMC study specific designee in order to clarify 
any items.  The CUMC study specific designee will communicate with the applicable 
site study team personnel for additional clarifications necessary prior to enrollment. 
 
6. Upon receipt of the subject registration notification email, the CUMC study specific 
designee will forward the notification email (which will include the study specific 
patient ID) to the affiliate site’s Principal Investigator, Consenting Professional, and 
applicable research personnel.  This notification should be filed in the patient research 
binder accordingly. Protocol therapy may not be initiated prior to receipt of this 
notification from the coordinating center. 
 
7. All screenfail/ineligible subjects, as well as subject’s who withdraw consent prior to 
enrollment/initiation of protocol therapy must be submitted to the Central Registration 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23
Office in a manner analogous to the procedures noted above. Applicable source 
documentation will be required within the corresponding submissions. 
 
8. TREATMENT PLAN 
 
8.1 
Agent Administration 
 
Treatment will be administered on an outpatient basis.  Reported adverse events and potential 
risks for Pembrolizumab described in Section 10.  Appropriate dose modifications for 
Pembrolizumab are described in Section 9.  No investigational or commercial agents or 
therapies other than those described below may be administered with the intent to treat the 
patient's malignancy. 
 
Merck will send pembrolizumab directly to sub-sites, and CUMC will coordinate the first 
affiliate drug order. Commercial pemetrexed, nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin will be used.  
 
The treatment to be used in this trial is outlined below in Table 4.  
 
Table 4: Trial Treatment 
 
All drugs will be administered as below per institutional guidelines and per the approved 
product labels  
 
Cohort 1 
Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV over 30 (-5, +10) 
minutes q 3 weeks x 2 years 
Cohort 2  
Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV  over 30 (-5, +10) 
minutes q 3 weeks x 2 years 
Nab-paclitaxel1 (100 mg/m2) IV over 30 minutes +/- 
10 minutes D 1, 8 and 15) x 2 cycles 
Carboplatin2 (AUC 5 q 3 weeks) IV between 15-30 
minutes x 2 cycles 
Cohort 3 
Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV over 30 (-5, +10) 
minutes q 3 weeks x 2 years 
Pemetrexed3 500 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes +/- 10 
minutes q 3 weeks x 2 cycles 
Carboplatin2 (AUC 5 q 3 weeks) IV between 15-30 
minutes x 2 cycles  
1Nab-paclitaxel doses should be administered at a minimum of 5 days apart. The dose should 
be recalculated if patient experiences ≥10% weight change from C1D1/pre-treatment labs.  
2Carboplatin dose should be recalculated per the discretion of the investigator  
3Pemetrexed dose should be recalculated on C2D1 if patient experiences ≥10% weight 
change from C1D1/pre-treatment labs.   
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24
 
 
8.2 
Dose Selection  
 
Details on preparation and administration of Pembrolizumab are provided in the Pharmacy 
Manual.  Details on preparation and administration of nab-paclitaxel, pemetrexed and 
carboplatin are per the approved product label and institutional guidelines.   
 
8.3 
Biomarker Research 
 
Table 5: Biomarker Research. Translational research is as described but not limited to as 
outlined below: 
 
Tumor 
Non-synonymous mutation load 
Exome and RNAseq analysis [43-53] 
Mutational smoking signature 
Exome and RNAseq analysis [43-53] 
Neoantigen prediction 
In silico neoantigen prediction [1534] 
MHC, PD-L1, PD-L2, LAG3, IDO, Tim3, Ki-67 
IHC/IF [54] 
CD3, CD4, CD8, PD-1, FOXP3, TIA-1 
IHC/IF [54] 
PBMCs 
Neoantigen validation in vitro (quantitative) 
Intracellular cytokine staining [55] 
Neoantigen validation in vitro (qualitiative) 
Multimer assays [56] 
Tumor and PBMCs 
T cell receptor clonality 
TCR sequencing [57] 
Blood 
Germline sequencing 
Exome analysis [43-53] 
HLA typing 
HLA sequence-based typing [58] 
 
8.4 
General Concomitant Medication and Supportive Care Guidelines 
 
Medications or vaccinations specifically prohibited in the exclusion criteria are not allowed 
during the ongoing trial.  If there is a clinical indication for one of these or other medications 
or vaccinations specifically prohibited during the trial, discontinuation from trial therapy or 
vaccination may be required.  The investigator should discuss any questions regarding this 
with the Merck Clinical team.  The final decision on any supportive therapy or vaccination 
rests with the investigator and/or the subject's primary physician. 
 
8.4.1 Acceptable Concomitant Medications 
 
All treatments that the investigator considers necessary for a subject’s welfare may be 
administered at the discretion of the investigator in keeping with the community standards of 
medical care.  All concomitant medication will be recorded on the case report form (CRF) 
including all prescription, over-the-counter (OTC), herbal supplements, and IV medications 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25
and fluids.  If changes occur during the trial period, documentation of drug dosage, 
frequency, route, and date may also be included on the CRF. 
All concomitant medications received within 28 days before the first dose of trial treatment 
and 30 days after the last dose of trial treatment should be recorded.  Concomitant 
medications administered after 30 days after the last dose of trial treatment should be 
recorded for SAEs and ECIs as defined in Section 10.2. 
 
8.4.2 Prohibited Concomitant Medications 
Subjects are prohibited from receiving the following therapies during the Screening and 
Treatment Phase of this trial: 
 Anti-cancer systemic chemotherapy or biological therapy  
 Immunotherapy not specified in this protocol 
 Chemotherapy not specified in this protocol 
 Investigational agents other than pembrolizumab  
 Radiation therapy  
o Note:  Radiation therapy to a symptomatic solitary lesion or to the brain may 
be allowed after consultation with Sponsor. 
o Subjects are allowed to receive palliative radiotherapy for painful bone lesions 
after consultation with Sponsor. Targeted external beam irradiation should not 
be used in the primary lung field where assessment for tumor is indicated. 
 Live vaccines within 30 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment and while 
participating in the trial.  Examples of live vaccines include, but are not limited to, the 
following: measles, mumps, rubella, chicken pox, yellow fever, rabies, BCG, and 
typhoid (oral) vaccine. Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally killed 
virus vaccines and are allowed; however intranasal influenza vaccines (e.g. Flu-
Mist®) are live attenuated vaccines, and are not allowed..  
 Glucocorticoids for any purpose other than to modulate symptoms from an event of 
clinical interest of suspected immunologic etiology (listed in Section 8.2.4 and the 
Investigator’s Brochure).  The use of physiologic doses of corticosteroids may be 
approved after consultation with the Sponsor.  
Subjects who, in the assessment by the investigator, require the use of any of the 
aforementioned treatments for clinical management should be removed from the trial.  
Subjects may receive other medications that the investigator deems to be medically 
necessary. 
The Exclusion Criteria describes other medications, which are prohibited in this trial. 
There are no prohibited therapies during the Post-Treatment Follow-up Phase. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26
 
8.4.3 Supportive Care Guidelines 
 
Subjects should receive appropriate supportive care measures as deemed necessary by the 
treating investigator.  Suggested supportive care measures for the management of adverse 
events with potential immunologic etiology are outlined below. Where appropriate, these 
guidelines include the use of oral or intravenous treatment with corticosteroids as well as 
additional anti-inflammatory agents if symptoms do not improve with administration of 
corticosteroids.   Note that several courses of steroid tapering may be necessary as symptoms 
may worsen when the steroid dose is decreased. For each disorder, attempts should be made 
to rule out other causes such as metastatic disease or bacterial or viral infection, which might 
require additional supportive care. The treatment guidelines are intended to be applied when 
the investigator determines the events to be related to Pembrolizumab.  
Note: if after the evaluation the event is determined not to be related, the investigator is 
instructed to follow the ECI reporting guidance. Refer to Section 9 for dose modification.  
 
It may be necessary to perform conditional procedures such as bronchoscopy, endoscopy, or 
skin photography as part of evaluation of the event.  
 
 
Pneumonitis:  
 For Grade 2 events, treat with systemic corticosteroids. When symptoms improve to 
Grade 1 or less, steroid taper should be started and continued over no less than 4 
weeks. 
 For Grade 3-4 events, immediately treat with intravenous steroids.  Administer 
additional anti-inflammatory measures, as needed. 
 Add prophylactic antibiotics for opportunistic infections in the case of prolonged 
steroid administration 
 
Diarrhea/Colitis:  
 
Subjects should be carefully monitored for signs and symptoms of enterocolitis (such as 
diarrhea, abdominal pain, blood or mucus in stool, with or without fever) and of bowel 
perforation (such as peritoneal signs and ileus).   
 
 All subjects who experience diarrhea/colitis should be advised to drink liberal 
quantities of clear fluids.  If sufficient oral fluid intake is not feasible, fluid and 
electrolytes should be substituted via IV infusion.  For Grade 2 or higher diarrhea, 
consider GI consultation and endoscopy to confirm or rule out colitis. 
 For Grade 2 diarrhea/colitis that persists greater than 3 days, administer oral 
corticosteroids.  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27
 For Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea/colitis that persists > 1 week, treat with intravenous steroids 
followed by high dose oral steroids.   
 When symptoms improve to Grade 1 or less, steroid taper should be started and 
continued over no less than 4 weeks. 
 
Type 1 diabetes mellitus:  
 
If new onset, including diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]) or ≥ Grade 3 Hyperglycemia, if 
associated with ketosis (ketonuria) or metabolic acidosis (DKA) 
 
 Insulin replacement therapy is recommended for Type I diabetes mellitus and for 
Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia associated with metabolic acidosis or ketonuria.  
 
Evaluate patients with serum glucose and a metabolic panel, urine ketones, 
glycosylated hemoglobin, and C-peptide.  
Hypophysitis: 
 
 For Grade 2 events, treat with corticosteroids. When symptoms improve to Grade 1 or 
less, steroid taper should be started and continued over no less than 4 weeks. 
Replacement of appropriate hormones may be required as the steroid dose is tapered. 
 For Grade 3-4 events, treat with an initial dose of IV corticosteroids followed by oral 
corticosteroids. When symptoms improve to Grade 1 or less, steroid taper should be 
started and continued over no less than 4 weeks. Replacement of appropriate 
hormones may be required as the steroid dose is tapered. 
 
Hyperthyroidism or Hypothyroidism:  
 
Thyroid disorders can occur at any time during treatment. Monitor patients for changes in 
thyroid function (at the start of treatment, periodically during treatment, and as indicated 
based on clinical evaluation) and for clinical signs and symptoms of thyroid disorders. 
 
 Grade 2 hyperthyroidism : 
o Non-selective beta-blockers (e.g. propranolol) are suggested as initial therapy. 
 Grade 3-4 hyperthyroidism  
o Treat with an initial dose of IV corticosteroid followed by oral corticosteroids. 
When symptoms improve to Grade 1 or less, steroid taper should be started 
and continued over no less than 4 weeks. Replacement of appropriate 
hormones may be required as the steroid dose is tapered. 
 In hypothyroidism, thyroid hormone replacement therapy, with levothyroxine or 
liothyroinine, is indicated per standard of care. 
 
Hepatic: 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28
 For Grade 2 events, monitor liver function tests more frequently until returned to 
baseline values (consider weekly). Treat with IV or oral corticosteroids 
 For Grade 3-4 events, treat with intravenous corticosteroids for 24 to 48 hours. 
 When symptoms improve to Grade 1 or less, a steroid taper should be started and 
continued over no less than 4 weeks. 
 
Renal Failure or Nephritis: 
 For Grade 2 events, treat with corticosteroids. 
 For Grade 3-4 events, treat with systemic corticosteroids. 
 When symptoms improve to Grade 1 or less, steroid taper should be started and 
continued over no less than 4 weeks.  
 
Management of Infusion Reactions:  
Signs and symptoms usually develop during or shortly after drug infusion and generally 
resolve completely within 24 hours of completion of infusion.  
Table 6 below shows treatment guidelines for subjects who experience an infusion reaction 
associated with administration of Pembrolizumab. 
 
 
 
Table 6: Infusion Reaction Treatment Guidelines 
 
NCI CTCAE Grade 
Treatment 
Premedication at subsequent 
dosing 
Grade 1 
Mild reaction; infusion 
interruption not indicated; 
intervention not indicated 
Increase monitoring of vital signs as medically 
indicated until the subject is deemed medically stable 
in the opinion of the investigator. 
None 
Grade 2 
Requires infusion interruption 
but responds promptly to 
symptomatic treatment (e.g., 
antihistamines, NSAIDS, 
narcotics, IV fluids); 
prophylactic medications 
indicated for < =24 hrs 
Stop Infusion and monitor symptoms. 
Additional appropriate medical therapy may include 
but is not limited to: 
IV fluids 
Antihistamines 
NSAIDS 
Acetaminophen 
Narcotics 
Increase monitoring of vital signs as medically 
indicated until the subject is deemed medically stable 
in the opinion of the investigator. 
If symptoms resolve within one hour of stopping drug 
infusion, the infusion may be restarted at 50% of the 
original infusion rate (e.g., from 100 mL/hr to 50 
mL/hr).  Otherwise dosing will be held until 
symptoms resolve and the subject should be 
Subject may be premedicated 
1.5h (± 30 minutes) prior to 
infusion of Pembrolizumab 
with: 
 
Diphenhydramine 50 mg po (or 
equivalent dose of 
antihistamine). 
 
Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg 
po (or equivalent dose of 
antipyretic). 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29
premedicated for the next scheduled dose. 
Subjects who develop Grade 2 toxicity despite 
adequate premedication should be permanently 
discontinued from further trial treatment 
administration. 
Grades 3 or 4 
Grade 3: 
Prolonged (i.e., not rapidly 
responsive to symptomatic 
medication and/or brief 
interruption of infusion); 
recurrence of symptoms 
following initial improvement; 
hospitalization indicated for 
other clinical sequelae (e.g., 
renal impairment, pulmonary 
infiltrates) 
Grade 4: 
Life-threatening; pressor or 
ventilatory support indicated 
Stop Infusion. 
Additional appropriate medical therapy may include 
but is not limited to: 
IV fluids 
Antihistamines 
NSAIDS 
Acetaminophen 
Narcotics 
Oxygen 
Pressors 
Corticosteroids 
Epinephrine 
 
Increase monitoring of vital signs as medically 
indicated until the subject is deemed medically stable 
in the opinion of the investigator. 
Hospitalization may be indicated. 
Subject is permanently discontinued from further 
trial treatment administration. 
No subsequent dosing 
Appropriate resuscitation equipment should be available in the room and a physician readily available during the period of 
drug administration. 
 
Supportive care guidelines for nab-paclitaxel, pemetrexed and carboplatin are per 
institutional guidelines and approved product labels.  
 
8.4.4 Diet/Activity/Other Considerations 
 
Subjects should maintain a normal diet unless modifications are required to manage an AE 
such as diarrhea, nausea or vomiting. 
 
Contraception 
 
Pembrolizumab may have adverse effects on a fetus in utero.  Furthermore, it is not known if 
pembrolizumab has transient adverse effects on the composition of sperm.  Non-pregnant, 
non-breast-feeding women may be enrolled if they are willing to use 2 methods of birth 
control or are considered highly unlikely to conceive.  Highly unlikely to conceive is defined 
as 1) surgically sterilized, or 2) postmenopausal (a woman who is ≥45 years of age and has 
not had menses for greater than 1 year will be considered postmenopausal), or 3) not 
heterosexually active for the duration of the study.  The two birth control methods can be 
either two barrier methods or a barrier method plus a hormonal method to prevent pregnancy. 
Subjects should start using birth control from study Visit 1 throughout the study period up to 
120 days after the last dose of study therapy.  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30
The following are considered adequate barrier methods of contraception: diaphragm, condom 
(by the partner), copper intrauterine device, sponge, or spermicide.  Appropriate hormonal 
contraceptives will include any registered and marketed contraceptive agent that contains an 
estrogen and/or a progestational agent (including oral, subcutaneous, intrauterine, or 
intramuscular agents). 
Subjects should be informed that taking the study medication may involve unknown risks to 
the fetus (unborn baby) if pregnancy were to occur during the study.  In order to participate 
in the study they must adhere to the contraception requirement (described above) for the 
duration of the study and during the follow-up period defined in section 10.2.2 - Reporting of 
Pregnancy and Lactation to the Sponsor and to Merck.  If there is any question that a subject 
will not reliably comply with the requirements for contraception, that subject should not be 
entered into the study. 
 
Use in Pregnancy 
 
If a subject inadvertently becomes pregnant while on treatment with pembrolizumab, the 
subject will immediately be removed from the study.  The site will contact the subject at least 
monthly and document the subject’s status until the pregnancy has been completed or 
terminated.  The outcome of the pregnancy will be reported to the Sponsor and to Merck 
without delay and within 24 hours if the outcome is a serious adverse experience (e.g., death, 
abortion, congenital anomaly, or other disabling or life-threatening complication to the 
mother or newborn).  The study investigator will make every effort to obtain permission to 
follow the outcome of the pregnancy and report the condition of the fetus or newborn to the 
Sponsor.   If a male subject impregnates his female partner the study personnel at the site 
must be informed immediately and the pregnancy reported to the Sponsor and to Merck and 
followed as described above and in Section 10.2. 
Use in Nursing Women 
 
It is unknown whether pembrolizumab is excreted in human milk.  Since many drugs are 
excreted in human milk, and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in the 
nursing infant, subjects who are breast-feeding are not eligible for enrollment. 
8.5 
Duration of Therapy 
 
In the absence of treatment delays due to adverse events, treatment may continue for 2 years  
or until one of the following criteria applies: 
 
 Disease progression 
 Intercurrent illness that prevents further administration of treatment 
 Unacceptable adverse events(s) 
 Patient decides to withdraw from the study 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31
 General or specific changes in the patient's condition render the patient unacceptable 
for further treatment in the judgment of the investigator 
 
8.6 
Duration of Follow Up 
 
Refer to section 12.5 
 
8.7 
Criteria for Removal from Study 
 
Patients will be removed from study when any of the criteria listed in Section 8.5 applies.  
The reason for study removal and the date the patient was removed will be documented in the 
Case Report Form. 
 
 
9. DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS 
 
9.1 
Pembrolizumab 
 
Adverse events (both non-serious and serious) associated with Pembrolizumab exposure may 
represent an immunologic etiology.  These adverse events may occur shortly after the first 
dose or several months after the last dose of treatment. Pembrolizumab must be withheld for 
drug-related toxicities and severe or life-threatening AEs as per Table 7 below. See Section 
8.4 for supportive care guidelines, including use of corticosteroids. 
 
 
Table 7: Dose Modification Guidelines for Drug-Related Adverse Events 
 
Toxicity 
Hold Treatment 
For Grade 
Timing for Restarting 
Treatment 
Discontinue Subject 
Diarrhea/Colitis 
2-3 
 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 0-1. 
Toxicity does not resolve within 12 
weeks of last dose or inability to reduce 
corticosteroid to 10 mg or less of 
prednisone or equivalent per day within 
12 weeks. 
4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
AST, ALT, or 
Increased 
Bilirubin 
2 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve within 12 
weeks of last dose. 
3-4 
Permanently discontinue 
(see exception below)1 
Permanently discontinue 
Type 1 diabetes 
mellitus (if new 
onset) or 
Hyperglycemia 
T1DM or  
3-4 
Hold Pembrolizumab for new 
onset Type 1 diabetes mellitus or 
Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia 
associated with evidence of beta 
cell failure.  
Resume Pembrolizumab when patients 
are clinically and metabolically stable. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32
 
Hypophysitis 
2-3 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve within 12 
weeks of last dose or inability to reduce 
corticosteroid to 10 mg or less of 
prednisone or equivalent per day within 
12 weeks. 
4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
Hyperthyroidism  3 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve within 12 
weeks of last dose or inability to reduce 
corticosteroid to 10 mg or less of 
prednisone or equivalent per day within 
12 weeks. 
4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
Hypothyroidism 
2-4 
Therapy with Pembrolizumab can 
be continued while treatment for 
the thyroid disorder is instituted 
Therapy with Pembrolizumab can be 
continued while treatment for the thyroid 
disorder is instituted. 
Infusion 
Reaction 
3-4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
Pneumonitis 
2 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve within 12 
weeks of last dose or inability to reduce 
corticosteroid to 10 mg or less of 
prednisone or equivalent per day within 
12 weeks. 
3-4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
Renal Failure or 
Nephritis 
2 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve within 12 
weeks of last dose or inability to reduce 
corticosteroid to 10 mg or less of 
prednisone or equivalent per day within 
12 weeks. 
3-4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
All Other Drug-
Related Toxicity2 
3 or Severe 
Toxicity resolves to Grade 0-1 
Toxicity does not resolve within 12 
weeks of last dose or inability to reduce 
corticosteroid to 10 mg or less of 
prednisone or equivalent per day within 
12 weeks. 
4 
Permanently discontinue 
Permanently discontinue 
 
Note: Permanently discontinue for any severe or Grade 3 drug-related AE that recurs or any life-threatening 
event. 
1 For patients with liver metastasis who begin treatment with Grade 2 AST or ALT, if AST or ALT increases by 
greater than or equal to 50% relative to baseline and lasts for at least 1 week then patients should be discontinued. 
2 Patients with intolerable or persistent Grade 2 drug-related AE may hold study medication at physician discretion.  
Permanently discontinue study drug for persistent Grade 2 adverse reactions for which treatment with study drug has 
been held, that do not recover to Grade 0-1 within 12 weeks of the last dose.   
 
Dosing interruptions are permitted in the case of medical / surgical events or logistical 
reasons not related to study therapy (e.g., elective surgery, unrelated medical events, patient 
vacation, and/or holidays). Subjects should be placed back on study therapy within 3 weeks 
of the scheduled interruption, unless otherwise discussed with the Sponsor. If the delayed 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
33
dose is given outside the +/- 3 day window, the dosing schedule will shift so subsequent 
cycles are initiated every 3 weeks (+/- 3 days). The reason for interruption should be 
documented in the patient's study record. 
 
9.2 
Carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel 
 
Dose reductions, holds, and discontinuations for carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel may be made 
per approved product labels or according to physician judgment. When a treatment cycle is 
delayed or interrupted because of toxicity resulting from either component of the regimen, all 
study drugs should generally be held and resumed together to remain synchronized. 
However, if it is anticipated that chemotherapy will be delayed by 2 weeks or more, then 
Pembrolizumab should be given without the chemotherapy if there is no contraindication; 
this should be discussed with the Medical Monitor prior to re-initiating therapy.  
 
ANC must be ≥ 1500/mm3 and platelet counts must be ≥ 100,000/mm3 on Day 1 of each 
cycle. Nab-paclitaxel should not be administered on Days 8 or 15 of the cycle until counts 
recover to an ANC ≥ 1500/mm3 and platelets ≥ 50,000 cells/mm3. If nab-paclitaxel cannot be 
administered on Day 8 or 15 of the cycle, this treatment can be skipped, and the next dose 
should be given per original treatment schedule as long as counts have recovered to 
permissible levels. 
 
9.3 
Carboplatin and pemetrexed 
 
Dose reductions, holds, and discontinuations for carboplatin and pemetrexed may be made 
per approved product labels or according to physician judgment. When a treatment cycle is 
delayed or interrupted because of toxicity resulting from either component of the regimen, all 
study drugs should generally be held and resumed together to remain synchronized. 
However, if it is anticipated that chemotherapy will be delayed by 2 weeks or more, then 
Pembrolizumab should be given without the chemotherapy if there is no contraindication; 
this should be discussed with the Medical Monitor prior to re-initiating therapy. 
 
9.4 
Potential Overlapping Toxicities  
 
The risk of overlapping toxicities between Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy regimens is 
thought to be minimal. Nevertheless, the attribution and management of certain adverse 
events that have been associated with each agent separately (e.g., hepatotoxicity, skin, and 
gastrointestinal toxicity) may not be unambiguous when the agents are administered together. 
It is theoretically possible that allergic or inflammatory adverse events associated with these 
chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., hepatotoxicity) could be exacerbated by the 
immunostimulatory activity of Pembrolizumab. 
 
Toxicities should initially be managed according to the recommendations above, with dose 
holds and modifications (if applicable) applied to the component of the study regimen judged 
to be the primary cause. For severe (Grade 3) or persistent Grade 1/2 diarrhea, an endoscopic 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
34
evaluation should be considered. Additional tests, such as autoimmune serology or biopsies, 
may be used to determine a possible immunogenic etiology for adverse events listed above. 
If, in the opinion of the investigator, Pembrolizumab is a potential inciting factor, the dose of 
Pembrolizumab may be held indefinitely. Prompt symptomatic management is appropriate 
for mild immune-mediated adverse events. In severe cases, immune-mediated toxicities may 
be acutely managed with topical corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, or TNF-α 
inhibitors. These cases should be discussed with the Medical Monitor. 
 
10. ADVERSE EVENTS:  LIST AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS  
 
10.1 
Adverse  events  
 
Safety assessments will consist of monitoring and reporting adverse events (AEs) and serious 
adverse events (SAEs) per protocol.  This includes all events of death, and any study specific 
issue of concern. 
 
10.2 
Definitions 
 
Adverse Event: 
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a human 
subject, including abnormal sign, symptom or disease, temporally associated with the 
subject’s participation in research, whether or not considered related to the subject’s 
participation in the research. Abnormal results of diagnostic procedures are considered to be 
adverse events if the abnormality: 
 
 results in study withdrawal 
 is associated with a serious adverse event 
 is associated with clinical signs or symptoms 
 leads to additional treatment or to further diagnostic tests 
 is considered by the investigator to be of clinical significance 
 
Changes resulting from normal growth and development that do not vary significantly in 
frequency or severity from expected levels are not to be considered adverse events.  
Examples of this may include, but are not limited to, teething, typical crying in infants and 
children and onset of menses or menopause occurring at a physiologically appropriate time. 
Merck product includes any pharmaceutical product, biological product, device, diagnostic 
agent or protocol-specified procedure, whether investigational (including placebo or active 
comparator medication) or marketed, manufactured by, licensed by, provided by or 
distributed by Merck for human use. 
 
Adverse events may occur during the course of the use of Merck product in clinical trials or 
within the follow-up period specified by the protocol, or prescribed in clinical practice, from 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35
overdose (whether accidental or intentional), from abuse and from withdrawal. 
Adverse events may also occur in screened subjects during any pre-allocation baseline period 
as a result of a protocol-specified intervention, including washout or discontinuation of usual 
therapy, diet, placebo treatment or a procedure. 
 
All adverse events will be recorded from the time the consent form is signed through 30 days 
following cessation of treatment and at each examination on the Adverse Event case report 
forms/worksheets. The reporting timeframe for adverse events meeting any serious criteria is 
described in section 10.2.3. 
 
Adverse events will not be collected for subjects during the pre-screening period (for 
determination of archival tissue status) as long as that subject has not undergone any 
protocol-specified procedure or intervention.  If the subject requires a blood draw, fresh 
tumor biopsy etc., the subject is first required to provide consent to the main study and AEs 
will be captured according to guidelines for standard AE reporting. 
 
10.2.1 Definition of an Overdose for This Protocol and Reporting of 
Overdose to the Sponsor and to Merck 
 
For purposes of this trial, an overdose will be defined as any dose exceeding the prescribed 
dose for pembrolizumab by 20% over the prescribed dose. No specific information is 
available on the treatment of overdose of pembrolizumab. In the event of overdose, 
pembrolizumab should be discontinued and the subject should be observed closely for signs 
of toxicity.  Appropriate supportive treatment should be provided if clinically indicated. 
If an adverse event(s) is associated with (“results from”) the overdose of a Merck product, 
the adverse event(s) is reported as a serious adverse event, even if no other seriousness 
criteria are met. 
 
If a dose of Merck’s product meeting the protocol definition of overdose is taken without any 
associated clinical symptoms or abnormal laboratory results, the overdose is reported as a 
non-serious Event of Clinical Interest (ECI), using the terminology “accidental or intentional 
overdose without adverse effect.” 
 
All reports of overdose with and without an adverse event must be reported within 24 hours 
to the Sponsor and within 2 working days hours to Merck Global Safety. (Attn: Worldwide 
Product Safety; FAX 215 993-1220) 
 
10.2.2 Reporting of Pregnancy and Lactation to the Sponsor and to Merck 
 
Although pregnancy and lactation are not considered adverse events, it is the responsibility of 
investigators or their designees to report any pregnancy or lactation in a subject 
(spontaneously reported to them), including the pregnancy of a male subject's female partner 
that occurs during the trial or within 120 days of completing the trial completing the trial, or 
30 days following cessation of treatment if the subject initiates new anticancer therapy, 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
36
whichever is earlier.  All subjects and female partners of male subjects who become pregnant 
must be followed to the completion/termination of the pregnancy.  Pregnancy outcomes of 
spontaneous abortion, missed abortion, benign hydatidiform mole, blighted ovum, fetal 
death, intrauterine death, miscarriage and stillbirth must be reported as serious events 
(Important Medical Events).  If the pregnancy continues to term, the outcome (health of 
infant) must also be reported. 
 
Such events must be reported within 24 hours to the Sponsor and within 2 working days to 
Merck Global Safety. (Attn: Worldwide Product Safety; FAX 215 993-1220) 
 
10.2.3 Serious Adverse Event: 
 
Adverse events are classified as serious or non-serious.  A serious adverse event is any AE 
that is:  
 fatal 
 life-threatening 
 requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalation, unless:  
o routine treatment  or monitoring of the studied indication, not associated with any 
deterioration in condition (procedures such as central line placements, 
paracentesis, pain control) 
o elective or pre-planned treatment for a pre-existing condition that is unrelated to 
the indication under study and has not worsened since the start of study drug 
o treatment on an emergency outpatient basis for an event not fulfilling any of the 
definitions of an SAE given above/below and not resulting in hospital 
administrations 
o social reasons and respite care in the absence of any deterioration in the patient’s 
general condition 
 results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity 
 a congenital anomaly or birth defect 
 an important medical event 
 is a new cancer (that is not a condition of the study); 
 is associated with an overdose 
 
Note: Serious adverse events are only to be reported following initial treatment. 
 
Important medical events are those that may not be immediately life threatening, but are 
clearly of major clinical significance.   They may jeopardize the subject, and may require 
intervention to prevent one of the other serious outcomes noted above.  For example, drug 
overdose or abuse, a seizure that did not result in in-patient hospitalization or intensive 
treatment of bronchospasm in an emergency department would typically be considered 
serious.  
 
Progression of the cancer under study is not considered an serious adverse event unless it 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
37
results in hospitalization. 
 
Any serious adverse event, or follow up to a serious adverse event, including death due to 
any cause other than progression of the cancer under study that occurs to any subject from 
the time the consent is signed through 90 days following cessation of treatment, or the 
initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, whichever is earlier, whether or not related to Merck 
product, must be reported within 24 hours to the Sponsor and within 2 working days to 
Merck Global Safety.  
 
Non-serious Events of Clinical Interest will be forwarded to Merck Global Safety and will be 
handled in the same manner as SAEs.  
 
Additionally, any serious adverse event, considered by an investigator who is a qualified 
physician to be related to Merck product that is brought to the attention of the investigator at 
any time outside of the time period specified in the previous paragraph also must be reported 
immediately to the Sponsor and to Merck. 
 
SAE reports and any other relevant safety information are to be forwarded to the Merck 
Global Safety facsimile number:  +1-215-993-1220 
 
A copy of all 15 Day Reports and Annual Progress Reports is submitted as required by FDA, 
European Union (EU), Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices agency (PMDA) or other local 
regulators. Investigators will cross reference this submission according to local regulations to 
the Merck Investigational Compound Number (IND, CSA, etc.) at the time of submission.  
Additionally investigators will submit a copy of these reports to Merck & Co., Inc. (Attn: 
Worldwide Product Safety; FAX 215 993-1220) at the time of submission to FDA. 
All subjects with serious adverse events must be followed up for outcome. 
All adverse events that do not meet any of the criteria for serious events should be regarded 
as non-serious adverse events.  
 
10.2.4 Unanticipated Problem: 
 
An unanticipated problem is any incident, experience or outcome involving risks to subjects 
or others in any human subjects research that meets all of the following criteria: 
 Unexpected (in terms of nature, severity or frequency) given (a) the research 
procedures that are described in the IRB-approval protocol and informed consent 
document, and (b) the characteristics of the subject population being studied; 
 Related or possibly related to participation in such research (e.g., there is a reasonable 
possibility that the incident, experience or outcome may have been caused by the 
procedures involved in such research); and  
 Suggests that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm (including 
physical, psychological, economic or social harm) than was previously known or 
recognized.  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
38
10.2.5 Adverse Event Reporting Period 
 
The study period during which adverse events must be reported is normally defined as the 
period from the initiation of any study procedures (e.g., after the first dose of study 
treatment) to the end of the study treatment (e.g., last dose of study treatment) and/or follow-
up.  For this study, the study treatment follow-up is defined as 90 days following the last 
administration of study treatment, or 90 days following the decision to remove the subject 
from study treatment, whichever is earliest. 
 
10.2.6 Events of Clinical Interest 
 
Selected non-serious and serious adverse events are also known as Events of Clinical Interest 
(ECI) and must be recorded as such on the Adverse Event case report forms/worksheets and 
reported within 24 hours to the Sponsor and within 2 working days to Merck Global Safety. 
(Attn: Worldwide Product Safety; FAX 215 993-1220) 
Events of clinical interest for this trial include: 
 
10.2.6.1 
an overdose of Merck product, as defined in Section 10.2.1 - Definition of an 
Overdose for This Protocol and Reporting of Overdose to the Sponsor, that is not 
associated with clinical symptoms or abnormal laboratory results.  
 
10.2.6.2 
an elevated AST or ALT lab value that is greater than or equal to 3X the upper 
limit of normal and an elevated total bilirubin lab value that is greater than or 
equal to 2X the upper limit of normal and, at the same time, an alkaline 
phosphatase lab value that is less than 2X the upper limit of normal, as 
determined by way of protocol-specified laboratory testing or unscheduled 
laboratory testing.* 
 
*Note:  These criteria are based upon available regulatory guidance documents. The purpose 
of the criteria is to specify a threshold of abnormal hepatic tests that may require an 
additional evaluation for an underlying etiology.  The trial site guidance for assessment and 
follow up of these criteria can be found in the Investigator Trial File Binder (or equivalent). 
 
10.2.7 Additional adverse events 
 
 
ECIs (both non-serious and serious adverse events) from the date of first dose through 90 
days following cessation of treatment, or 30 days after the initiation of a new anticancer 
therapy, whichever is earlier, need to be reported within 24 hours to the Sponsor and within 2 
working days to Merck Global Safety. (Attn: Worldwide Product Safety; FAX 215 993-
1220), regardless of attribution to study treatment, consistent with standard SAE reporting 
guidelines. 
 
Subjects should be assessed for possible ECIs prior to each dose.  Lab results should be 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  21 JUN 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
39
evaluated and subjects should be asked for signs and symptoms suggestive of an immune-
related event.  Subjects who develop an ECI thought to be immune-related should have 
additional testing to rule out other etiologic causes.  If lab results or symptoms indicate a 
possible immune-related ECI, then additional testing should be performed to rule out other 
etiologic causes.  If no other cause is found, then it is assumed to be immune-related. 
 
10.2.8 Evaluating Adverse Events 
 
An investigator who is a qualified physician will evaluate all adverse events according to the 
NCI Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. Any adverse event 
which changes CTCAE grade over the course of a given episode will have each change of 
grade recorded on the adverse event case report forms/worksheets. 
All adverse events regardless of CTCAE grade must also be evaluated for seriousness. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  16 MAY 2017  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
40
Table 8: Evaluating Adverse Events: An investigator who is a qualified physician, will evaluate all adverse events as to: 
 
V4.0 CTCAE 
Grading 
Grade 1 
Mild; asymptomatic or mid symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. 
 
Grade 2 
Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL. 
 
Grade 3 
Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation or 
hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL. 
 
Grade 4 
Life threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. 
 
Grade 5 
Death related to AE 
Seriousness 
A serious adverse event is any adverse event occurring at any dose or during any use of Merck product that: 
 
†Results in death; or 
 
†Is life threatening; or places the subject, in the view of the investigator, at immediate risk of death from the event as it occurred (Note: 
This does not include an adverse event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death.); or 
 
†Results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of one’s ability to conduct normal life functions); or 
 
†Results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization (hospitalization is defined as an inpatient admission, regardless of length of 
stay, even if the hospitalization is a precautionary measure for continued observation. (Note: Hospitalization [including hospitalization for an 
elective procedure] for a preexisting condition which has not worsened does not constitute a serious adverse event.); or 
 
†Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect (in offspring of subject taking the product regardless of time to diagnosis);or 
 
Is a new cancer; (that is not a condition of the study) or 
 
Is an overdose (whether accidental or intentional).  Any adverse event associated with an overdose is considered a serious adverse event. An 
overdose that is not associated with an adverse event is considered a non-serious event of clinical interest and must be reported within 24 
hours. 
 
Other important medical events that may not result in death, not be life threatening, or not require hospitalization may be considered a 
serious adverse event when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, the event may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or 
surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed previously (designated above by a †). 
Duration 
Record the start and stop dates of the adverse event. If less than 1 day, indicate the appropriate length of time and units 
Action taken  
Did the adverse event cause the Merck product to be discontinued? 
Relationship 
to test drug  
Did the Merck product cause the adverse event? The determination of the likelihood that the Merck product caused the adverse event will be 
provided by an investigator who is a qualified physician. The investigator’s signed/dated initials on the source document or worksheet that 
supports the causality noted on the AE form, ensures that a medically qualified assessment of causality was done. This initialed document 
must be retained for the required regulatory time frame. The criteria below are intended as reference guidelines to assist the investigator in 
assessing the likelihood of a relationship between the test drug and the adverse event based upon the available information.  
The following components are to be used to assess the relationship between the Merck product and the AE; the greater the correlation 
with the components and their respective elements (in number and/or intensity), the more likely the Merck product caused the adverse event 
(AE): 
 
Exposure 
Is there evidence that the subject was actually exposed to the Merck product such as: reliable history, acceptable 
compliance assessment (pill count, diary, etc.), expected pharmacologic effect, or measurement of drug/metabolite in 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  16 MAY 2017  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
41
bodily specimen? 
 
Time Course 
Did the AE follow in a reasonable temporal sequence from administration of the Merck product?  
Is the time of onset of the AE compatible with a drug-induced effect (applies to trials with investigational medicinal 
product)? 
 
Likely Cause 
Is the AE not reasonably explained by another etiology such as underlying disease, other drug(s)/vaccine(s), or other host 
or environmental factors 
 
Relationship 
The following components are to be used to assess the relationship between the test drug and the AE: (continued) 
to Merck 
product 
(continued)  
Dechallenge 
Was the Merck product discontinued or dose/exposure/frequency reduced? 
If yes, did the AE resolve or improve? 
If yes, this is a positive dechallenge. If no, this is a negative dechallenge. 
(Note: This criterion is not applicable if: (1) the AE resulted in death or permanent disability; (2) the AE 
resolved/improved despite continuation of the Merck product; or (3) the trial is a single-dose drug trial); or (4) Merck 
product(s) is/are only used one time.) 
 
Rechallenge 
Was the subject re-exposed to the Merck product in this study? 
If yes, did the AE recur or worsen? 
If yes, this is a positive rechallenge. If no, this is a negative rechallenge. 
(Note: This criterion is not applicable if: (1) the initial AE resulted in death or permanent disability, or (2) the trial is a 
single-dose drug trial); or (3) Merck product(s) is/are used only one time). 
NOTE: IF A RECHALLENGE IS PLANNED FOR AN ADVERSE EVENT WHICH WAS SERIOUS AND WHICH 
MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THE MERCK PRODUCT, OR IF REEXPOSURE TO THE MERCK PRODUCT 
POSES ADDITIONAL POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT RISK TO THE SUBJECT, THEN THE RECHALLENGE MUST 
BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE U.S. CLINICAL MONITOR AS PER DOSE MODIFICATION GUIDELINES 
IN THE PROTOCOL. 
 
Consistency 
with Trial 
Treatment 
Profile 
Is the clinical/pathological presentation of the AE consistent with previous knowledge regarding the Merck product or 
drug class pharmacology or toxicology? 
The assessment of relationship will be reported on the case report forms /worksheets by an investigator who is a qualified physician according to his/her best 
clinical judgment, including consideration of the above elements. 
Record one of the following 
Use the following scale of criteria as guidance (not all criteria must be present to be indicative of a Merck product 
relationship). 
Yes, there is a reasonable 
possibility of Merck product 
relationship. 
There is evidence of exposure to the Merck product.  The temporal sequence of the AE onset relative to the administration 
of the Merck product is reasonable.  The AE is more likely explained by the Merck product than by another cause. 
No, there is not a reasonable 
possibility Merck product 
Subject did not receive the Merck product OR temporal sequence of the AE onset relative to administration of the Merck 
product is not reasonable OR there is another obvious cause of the AE.  (Also entered for a subject with overdose without 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 - Version Date:  16 MAY 2017  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
42
relationship 
an associated AE.) 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
43
10.3 
Sponsor Responsibility for Reporting Adverse Events 
 
All Adverse Events will be reported to regulatory authorities, IRB/IECs and investigators in 
accordance with all applicable global laws and regulations. 
 
10.3.1 Baseline/Preexisting Condition 
 
A baseline/preexisting condition is one that is present at the start of the study. A preexisting 
condition should be recorded as an adverse event if the frequency, intensity, or if the 
character of the condition worsens during the study period. 
 
10.3.2 General Physical Examination Findings 
 
At screening, any clinically significant abnormality should be recorded as a preexisting 
condition.  At the end of the study, any new clinically significant findings/abnormalities that 
meet the definition of an adverse event must also be recorded and documented as an adverse 
event.  
 
10.3.3 Post-study Adverse Event 
 
All unresolved adverse events (related to study drug(s))should be followed by the 
investigator until the events are resolved, the subject is lost to follow-up, or the adverse event 
is otherwise explained.  At the last scheduled visit, the investigator should instruct each 
subject to report any subsequent event(s) that the subject, or the subject’s personal physician, 
believes might reasonably be related to participation in this study.   
 
10.3.4 Abnormal Laboratory Values 
 
Abnormal Laboratory Values: All clinical laboratory abnormalities should be documented as 
adverse events if the severity meets grading criteria (1-5) per CTCAE version 4.0. 
 
10.3.5 Hospitalization, Prolonged Hospitalization or Surgery 
 
Any adverse event that results in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization should be 
documented and reported as a serious adverse event unless specifically instructed otherwise 
in this protocol.  Any condition responsible for surgery should be documented as an adverse 
event if the condition meets the criteria for an adverse event.  
 
Neither the condition, hospitalization, prolonged hospitalization, nor surgery are reported as 
an adverse event in the following circumstances: 
 Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization for diagnostic or elective surgical procedures 
for a preexisting condition.  Surgery should not be reported as an outcome of an adverse 
event if the purpose of the surgery was elective or diagnostic and the outcome was 
uneventful. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44
 Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization required to allow efficacy measurement for 
the study. 
 Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization for therapy of the target disease of the study, 
unless it is a worsening or increase in frequency of hospital admissions as judged by the 
clinical investigator. 
 
10.4 
Recording of Adverse Events 
 
At each contact with the subject, the investigator must seek information on adverse events by 
specific questioning and, as appropriate, by examination.  Information on all adverse events 
should be recorded immediately in the source document, and also in the appropriate adverse 
event module of the case report form (CRF).  All clearly related signs, symptoms, and 
abnormal diagnostic procedures results should recorded in the source document, though 
should be grouped under one diagnosis. 
 
All adverse events occurring during the study period must be recorded.  The clinical course 
of each event should be followed until resolution, stabilization, or until it has been 
determined that the study treatment or participation is not the cause.  Serious adverse events 
that are still ongoing at the end of the study period must be followed up to determine the final 
outcome.  Any serious adverse event that occurs after the study period and is considered to 
be possibly related to the study treatment or study participation should be recorded and 
reported immediately. 
 
10.5 
Reporting of Serious Adverse Events 
 
10.5.1 IRB Notification by Sponsor-Investigator 
Reports of all events (including follow-up information) that meet the definition of an 
unanticipated problem posing risk to subjects or others must be submitted to the IRB within 
one week (5 business days) following the occurrence of the unanticipated problem or the 
principal investigator’s acquiring knowledge of the unanticipated problem  in accordance 
with IRB policy. Additionally, the sponsor-investigator will submit a summary of all 
Unanticipated problems that occurred since the beginning of the study at the time of 
continuing review. Copies of each report and documentation of IRB notification and receipt 
will be kept in the Regulatory binder. 
 
10.5.2 FDA Notification by Sponsor-Investigator 
 
The Columbia University Medical Center Sponsor-Investigator, as holder of the IND, will be 
responsible for all communication with the FDA. Columbia University Medical Center 
Principal Investigator will report to the FDA, regardless of the site of occurrence, any adverse 
event that is serious, unexpected and there is evidence to suggest a causal relationship 
between the drug and the adverse event. These must be reported to the FDA and any affiliate 
sites as soon as possible, but in no case later than 15 calendar days after the sponsor 
determines that the information qualifies for reporting.  The Sponsor-Investigator will also 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
45
submit an IND annual report to the FDA in accordance with 21.CFR 312.33. 
 
The Columbia University Medical Center Sponsor Investigator must report to the FDA and 
any affiliate site investigators as follows:  
 Any unexpected fatal or life-threatening event must be reported as soon as possible, but 
no later than 7 calendar days after the sponsor investigator initial receipt of the 
information 
 Any findings from epidemiological studies, pooled analysis of multiple studies, or 
clinical studies, whether or not conducted under an IND, and whether or not conducted 
by the sponsor-investigator, that suggest a significant risk in humans exposed to the drug  
must be reported as soon as possible but no later than 15 calendar days after the sponsor-
investigator determines that the information qualifies for reporting 
 Any findings from animal or in vitro testing whether or not conducted under an IND, and 
whether or not conducted by the sponsor-investigator, that suggest a significant risk in 
humans exposed to the drug  must be reported as soon as possible but no later than 15 
calendar days after the sponsor-investigator determines that the information qualifies for 
reporting 
 Any clinically important increase in the rate of a serious suspected adverse reactions  
over that listed in the protocol or Investigator Brochure 
 Expected SAEs and AEs will be included in the IND Annual Reports. 
Follow-up information to a safety report should be submitted as soon as the relevant 
information is available.  However, if the results of a sponsor’s investigation show that an 
adverse drug experience not initially determined to be reportable are so reportable, the 
sponsor investigator must report such experience as soon as possible, but no later than 15 
calendar days after the determination is made. 
 
All other serious unexpected experiences associated with the use of the study treatment will 
be reported to FDA as soon as possible but in no event later than 15 calendar days after 
initial receipt of the information. 
 
10.5.3 DSMC Reporting by the Sponsor Investigator 
 
Serious adverse events not constituting unanticipated problems are to be reported to the 
HICCC DSMC. Reporting should occur within 24 hours of knowledge of the SAE occurring 
at our institution or affiliate sites. 
 
10.5.4 Reporting to Drug Manufacturer by Sponsor-Investigator 
 
Please refer to section 10.2.3 for further details. 
 
10.6 
Reporting Process 
 
Adverse events may be submitted on FDA Form 3500A, the HICCC DSMC Serious Adverse 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
46
Event Reporting Form, or in a narrative format. If supplied as in a narrative format, the 
minimum information to be supplied is noted above at the beginning of section 10.4.  
 
 
11. PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION 
 
The investigator shall take responsibility for and shall take all steps to maintain appropriate 
records and ensure appropriate supply, storage, handling, distribution and usage of 
investigational product in accordance with the protocol and any applicable laws and 
regulations. 
 
Study Drugs  
 
Pembrolizumab, Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane), Pemetrexed, Carboplatin 
 
Table 9: Description 
 
 
Product Name & Potency 
Dosage Form 
pembrolizumab 50 mg 
Lyophilized Powder for Injection 
pembrolizumab 100 mg/ 4mL 
Solution for Injection 
Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) 100 mg  
Lyophilized Powder for Injection 
Pemetrexed 
Lyophilized Powder for Injection 
Carboplatin 50 mg/5 mL 
Solution for Injection 
Carboplatin 150 mg 
Lyophilized Powder for Injection 
 
 
11.1 
Treatment Regimen 
 
For Cohort 1:  Pembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered IV every 3 weeks until 
progression of disease. 
 
For Cohort 2: 
  
 Pembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered IV every 3 weeks until progression of 
disease  
 Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks administered for 2 
cycles concurrently with cycles 1 and 2 of pembrolizumab 
 
Carboplatin AUC = 5 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks administered for 2 cycles 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
47
concurrently with cycles 1 and 2 of pembrolizumab 
For Cohort 3: 
  
 Pembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered IV every 3 weeks until progression of 
disease  
 Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV administered for 2 cycles concurrently with cycles 1 and 2 
of pembrolizumab 
 
Carboplatin AUC = 5 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks administered for 2 cycles 
concurrently with cycles 1 and 2 of pembrolizumab 
11.2 
Method for Assigning Subjects to Treatment Groups 
 
Assignment to cohort will be per investigator choice; a maximum of 30 patients per cohort 
will be enrolled. For patients with squamous histology, enrollment will be allowed only to 
cohorts 1 or 2. For patients with non-squamous histology enrollment will be to any of the 3 
cohorts. If enrollment to a cohort is completed, enrollment may continue to other open 
cohorts.  
 
11.3 
Preparation and Administration of Study Drug 
 
Details on preparation of Pembrolizumab are provided in the Pharmacy Manual.  Details on 
preparation of nab-paclitaxel, pemetrexed and carboplatin are per the approved product label 
and institutional guidelines.  
 
Drug administration order:  
Cohort 1: pembrolizumab only 
Cohort 2: pembrolizumab followed by nab-paclitaxel followed by carboplatin 
Cohort 3: pembrolizumab followed by pemetrexed followed by carboplatin 
11.4 
 Subject Compliance Monitoring 
 
The study team will monitor subject compliance with protocol mandated procedures. If a 
subject continually demonstrates non-compliance, the treating investigator (in collaboration 
with the CUMC Principal Investigator) will consider removing the subject from study. 
 
11.5 
Prior and Concomitant Therapy 
 
Please refer to Section 12.2.5 for more information.  
 
11.6 
Packaging 
 
Clinical supplies will be affixed with a clinical label in accordance with regulatory 
requirements. This trial is open-label; therefore, the subject, the trial site personnel, the 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
48
Sponsor and/or designee are not blinded to treatment. Drug identity (name, strength) is 
included in the label text; random code/disclosure envelopes or lists are not provided. 
 
11.6.1 Clinical Supplies Disclosure 
 
This trial is open-label; therefore, the subject, the trial site personnel, the Sponsor and/or 
designee are not blinded to treatment. Drug identity (name, strength) is included in the label 
text; random code/disclosure envelopes or lists are not provided. 
 
11.7 
Blinding of Study Drug 
 
This is an open-label trial; therefore, the Sponsor, investigator and subject will know the 
treatment administered. 
11.8 
Receiving, Storage, Dispensing and Return 
 
11.8.1 Receipt of Drug Supplies 
 
Upon receipt of the of the study treatment supplies, an inventory must be performed and a 
drug receipt log filled out and signed by the person accepting the shipment. It is important 
that the designated study staff counts and verifies that the shipment contains all the items 
noted in the shipment inventory.  Any damaged or unusable study drug in a given shipment 
(active drug or comparator) will be documented in the study files.  The investigator must 
notify agent manufacturer of any damaged or unusable study treatments that were supplied to 
the investigator’s site. 
 
11.8.2 Storage 
 
Clinical supplies must be stored in a secure, limited-access location under the storage 
conditions specified on the label.  Receipt and dispensing of trial medication must be 
recorded by an authorized person at the trial site. Clinical supplies may not be used for any 
purpose other than that stated in the protocol. 
 
Storage instructions for carboplatin, pemetrexed and nab-paclitaxel are according to local 
practice. 
 
11.8.3 Dispensing of Study Drug 
 
The investigator is responsible for keeping accurate records of the clinical supplies received 
from Merck or designee, the amount dispensed to and returned by the subjects and the 
amount remaining at the conclusion of the trial. 
 
11.8.4 Return or Destruction of Study Drug 
 
Upon completion or termination of the study, all unused and/or partially used 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
49
investigational product will be destroyed at the site per institutional policy. It is the 
Investigator’s responsibility to arrange for disposal of all empty containers, provided that 
procedures for proper disposal have been established according to applicable federal, state, 
local and institutional guidelines and procedures, and provided that appropriate records of 
disposal are kept. 
 
12. STUDY CALENDAR 
 
Table 10: Study calender (Cohort 1) 
 
Cycle (Q3W) 
Screening9 
C1D1 
C1D8 
C2D1 
C2D8 
C3+ 
At POD 
Scheduling window 
(Days) 
-28 to -1 
+/- 3 days 
Informed consent 
X 
History and Physical  1-4 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Pregnancy test for 
WOCBP10 
X 
X 
Routine bloods 5 
X 
X 
X 
PT/PTT9 
X 
                          As clinically indicated 
Thyroid function tests6,9 
X 
X 
Hepatitis B, C, HIV 
X 
EKG 
X 
As clinically indicated 
AE assessment 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Concomitant medications 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Radiographic tumor 
assessment 
X 
Every 9 weeks (±1 week) 
MRI brain11 
X 
As clinically indicated 
Research blood tests7 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Tumor biopsy8 
X 
X 
Pembrolizumab 
X 
X 
X 
 
1 Medical history includes baseline symptoms as well as detailed history of prior cancer 
therapies including start and stop dates, disease progression during or after therapy, as well as 
discontinuations due to intolerability or any other serious illness. Smoking history should be 
captured at screening.  
2 Body height to be measured at screening only 
3 Vital signs include weight, temperature, pulse, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation  
4 Full physical exam for baseline and end of study visit. Other study visit physical exams may 
be symptom directed.   
5 Routine bloods: Hematology, Chemistry and Urinalysis as outlined in Table 13. 
6 Thyroid function tests (TSH, reflexive free T4/free T3 if TSH is abnormal) should be 
performed at screening, Cycle 4, and every 3 cycles thereafter.  
7 Research bloods will be drawn for T-cell subsets/PBMCs and serum and plasma for 
banking at  pre-treatment (either screening or C1D1), C1D8, C2D1, C2D8, C3D1, every 4 
cycles thereafter  and at progression. Blood for germline sequencing and HLA typing will be 
drawn pre-treatment. 
X 
X 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50
8 Archival tissue, at minimum two core equivalents,  acquired within 3 months before 
treatment initiation and in the absence of intervening systemic therapy may be used for the 
pre-treatment timepoint after review of the pathology report and approval by the medical 
monitor. The window for the on-treatment biopsy will be +/- 7 days from the date of C2D8. 
9 Screening labs to be performed within 10 days of Cycle 1 Day 1 except for Hepatitis B, C, 
and HIV, which can be done within 28 days of Cycle 1 Day 1. 
10 Pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential should be performed at screening, 
Cycle 4, and every 3 cycles thereafter. 
11 CT of the head can be used in place of a brain MRI 
Table 11: Study calender (Cohort 2) 
Cycle (Q3W) 
Screening9 
C1D1 
C1D
8 
C1D
15 
C2D
1 
C2D
8 
C2D15 
C3
+ 
At POD 
Scheduling window 
(Days) 
-28 to -1 
+/- 3 days 
Informed consent 
X 
History and Physical  1-4 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Pregnancy test for 
WOCBP10 
X 
X 
Routine bloods 5 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
PT/PTT9 
X 
As clinically indicated 
Thyroid function tests6,9 
X 
X 
Hepatitis B, C, HIV 
X 
EKG 
X 
              As clinically indicated 
AE assessment 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Concomitant 
medications 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Radiographic tumor 
assessment 
X 
Every 9 weeks (+/- 1 week) 
MRI brain11 
X 
                               As clinically indicated 
Research blood tests7 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Tumor biopsy8 
X 
X 
Pembrolizumab 
X 
X 
X 
Nab-paclitaxel12 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Carboplatin 
X 
X 
 
1 Medical history includes baseline symptoms as well as detailed history of prior cancer 
therapies including start and stop dates, disease progression during or after therapy, as well as 
discontinuations due to intolerability or any other serious illness 
2 Body height to be measured at screening only 
3 Vital signs include weight, temperature, pulse, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation  
4 Full physical exam for baseline and end of study visit. Other study visit physical exams may 
be symptom directed.   
5 Routine bloods: Hematology, Chemistry and Urinalysis as outlined in Table 13. 
6 Thyroid function tests (TSH, reflexive free T4/free T3 if TSH is abnormal) should be 
performed at screening, Cycle 4, and every 3 cycles thereafter.   
7 Research bloods will be drawn for T-cell subsets/PBMCs and serum and plasma for 
banking at  pre-treatment (either screening or C1D1), C1D8, C2D1, C2D8, C3D1, every 4 
X 
X 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
51
cycles thereafter  and at progression. Blood for germline sequencing and HLA typing will be 
drawn pre-treatment. 
8 Archival tissue, at minimum two core equivalents,  acquired within 3 months before 
treatment initiation and in the absence of intervening systemic therapy may be used for the 
pre-treatment timepoint after review of the pathology report and approval by the medical 
monitor. The window for the on-treatment biopsy will be +/- 7 days from the date of C2D8. 
9 Screening labs to be performed within 10 days of Cycle 1 Day 1 except for Hepatitis B, C, 
and HIV, which can be done within 28 days of Cycle 1 Day 1. 
10 Pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential should be performed at screening, 
Cycle 4, and every 3 cycles thereafter. 
11 CT of the head can be used in place of a brain MRI 
12 Nab-paclitaxel doses should be administered at a minimum of 5 days apart. 
 
 
Table 12: Study calender (Cohort 3) 
Cycle (Q3W) 
Screening9 
C1D1 
C1D8 
C2D1 
C2D8 
C3+ 
At POD 
Scheduling window 
(Days) 
-28 to -1 
+/- 3 days 
Informed consent 
X 
History and Physical  1-4 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Pregnancy test for 
WOCBP10 
X 
X 
Routine bloods 5 
X 
X 
X 
PT/PTT9 
X 
As clinically indicated 
Thyroid function tests6,9 
X 
X 
Hepatitis B, C, HIV 
X 
EKG 
X 
As clinically indicated 
AE assessment 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Concomitant 
medications 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Radiographic tumor 
assessment 
X 
Every 9 weeks (- 1 week) 
MRI brain11 
X 
As clinically indicated 
Research blood tests7 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Tumor biopsy8 
X 
X 
Pembrolizumab 
X 
X 
X 
Pemetrexed 
X 
X 
Carboplatin 
X 
 
X 
 
1 Medical history includes baseline symptoms as well as detailed history of prior cancer 
therapies including start and stop dates, disease progression during or after therapy, as well as 
discontinuations due to intolerability or any other serious illness 
2 Body height to be measured at screening only 
3 Vital signs include weight, temperature, pulse, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation  
4 Full physical exam for baseline and end of study visit. Other study visit physical exams may 
be symptom directed.   
X 
X 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
52
5 Routine bloods: Hematology, Chemistry and Urinalysis as outlined in Table 13. 
6 Thyroid function tests (TSH, reflexive free T4/free T3 if TSH is abnormal) should be 
performed at screening, Cycle 4, and every 3 cycles thereafter.   
7 Research bloods will be drawn for T-cell subsets/PBMCs and serum and plasma for 
banking at  pre-treatment (either screening or C1D1), C1D8, C2D1, C2D8, C3D1, every 4 
cycles thereafter  and at progression. Blood for germline sequencing and HLA typing will be 
drawn pre-treatment. 
8 Archival tissue, at minimum two core equivalents,  acquired within 3 months before 
treatment initiation and in the absence of intervening systemic therapy may be used for the 
pre-treatment timepoint after review of the pathology report and approval by the medical 
monitor. The window for the on-treatment biopsy will be +/- 7 days from the date of C2D8. 
9 Screening labs to be performed within 10 days of Cycle 1 Day 1 except for Hepatitis B, C, 
and HIV, which can be done within 28 days of Cycle 1 Day 1 
10 Pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential should be performed at screening, 
Cycle 4, and every 3 cycles thereafter. 
11 CT of the head can be used in place of a brain MRI 
 
12.1 
Study  Procedures 
 
The Trial Flow Chart - Section 12 summarizes the trial procedures to be performed at each 
visit.  Individual trial procedures are described in detail below.  It may be necessary to 
perform these procedures at unscheduled time points if deemed clinically necessary by the 
investigator. 
 
Furthermore, additional evaluations/testing may be deemed necessary by the Sponsor and/or 
Merck for reasons related to subject safety. In some cases, such evaluation/testing may be 
potentially sensitive in nature (e.g., HIV, Hepatitis C, etc.), and thus local regulations may 
require that additional informed consent be obtained from the subject.  In these cases, such 
evaluations/testing will be performed in accordance with those regulations. 
 
12.2 
Administrative Procedures 
 
12.2.1 Informed Consent 
 
The Investigator must obtain documented consent from each potential subject prior to 
participating in a clinical trial. 
12.2.2 General Informed Consent 
 
Consent must be documented by the subject’s dated signature or by the subject’s legally 
acceptable representative’s dated signature on a consent form along with the dated signature 
of the person conducting the consent discussion.  
A copy of the signed and dated consent form should be given to the subject before 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
53
participation in the trial. 
 
The initial informed consent form, any subsequent revised written informed consent form 
and any written information provided to the subject must receive the IRB/ERC’s 
approval/favorable opinion in advance of use.  The subject or his/her legally acceptable 
representative should be informed in a timely manner if new information becomes available 
that may be relevant to the subject’s willingness to continue participation in the trial.  The 
communication of this information will be provided and documented via a revised consent 
form or addendum to the original consent form that captures the subject’s dated signature or 
by the subject’s legally acceptable representative’s dated signature. 
Specifics about a trial and the trial population will be added to the consent form template at 
the protocol level.   
 
The informed consent will adhere to IRB/ERC requirements, applicable laws and regulations 
and Sponsor requirements. 
 
12.2.3 Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
 
All inclusion and exclusion criteria will be reviewed by the investigator or qualified designee 
to ensure that the subject qualifies for the trial.  
12.2.4 Medical History 
 
A medical history will be obtained by the investigator or qualified designee.  Medical history 
will include all active conditions, and any condition diagnosed within the prior 10 years that 
are considered to be clinically significant by the Investigator.  Details regarding the disease 
for which the subject has enrolled in this study will be recorded separately and not listed as 
medical history.   
12.2.5 Smoking History 
 
Smoking history (smoker status, cigarettes per day, number of years, and start and stop dates) 
should be captured during the screening period. For patients enrolled prior to Protocol 
Version 2/8/2017, this should be done retrospectively.  
 
12.2.6 Prior and Concomitant Medications Review 
 
12.2.6.1 
Prior Medications 
 
The investigator or qualified designee will review prior medication use, including any 
protocol-specified washout requirement, and record prior medication taken by the subject 
within 28 days before starting the trial.  Treatment for the disease for which the subject has 
enrolled in this study will be recorded separately and not listed as a prior medication.  
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
54
12.2.6.2 
Concomitant Medications 
 
The investigator or qualified designee will record medication, if any, taken by the subject 
during the trial.  All medications related to reportable SAEs and ECIs should be recorded as 
defined in Section 8.4. 
 
12.2.6.3 
Disease Details and Treatments 
 
Disease Details: The investigator or qualified designee will obtain prior and current details 
regarding disease status.  
 
Prior Treatment Details: The investigator or qualified designee will review all prior cancer 
treatments including systemic treatments, radiation and surgeries. 
 
Subsequent Anti-Cancer Therapy Status: The investigator or qualified designee will review 
all new anti-neoplastic therapy initiated after the last dose of trial treatment.  If a subject 
initiates a new anti-cancer therapy within 30 days after the last dose of trial treatment, the 30 
day Safety Follow-up visit must occur before the first dose of the new therapy.  Once new 
anti-cancer therapy has been initiated the subject will move into survival follow-up.  
 
12.3 
Clinical Procedures/Assessments 
 
12.3.1 Adverse Event (AE) Monitoring 
 
The investigator or qualified designee will assess each subject to evaluate for potential new 
or worsening AEs as specified in the Trial Flow Chart and more frequently if clinically 
indicated.  Adverse experiences will be graded and recorded throughout the study and during 
the follow-up period according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0 (see Section 10.2.5).  Toxicities 
will be characterized in terms regarding seriousness, causality, toxicity grading, and action 
taken with regard to trial treatment.  
For subjects receiving treatment with Pembrolizumab all AEs of unknown etiology 
associated with Pembrolizumab exposure should be evaluated to determine if it is possibly an 
event of clinical interest (ECI) of a potentially immunologic etiology (termed immune-
related adverse events, or irAEs).   
 
Please refer to Section 10.2.5 for detailed information regarding the assessment and 
recording of AEs.   
12.3.2 Full Physical Exam 
 
The investigator or qualified designee will perform a complete physical exam during the 
screening period.  Clinically significant abnormal findings should be recorded as medical 
history.  A full physical exam should be performed during screening,  

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
55
12.3.3 Directed Physical Exam 
 
For cycles that do not require a full physical exam per the Trial Flow Chart, the investigator 
or qualified designee will perform a directed physical exam as clinically indicated prior to 
trial treatment administration.   
12.3.4 Vital Signs 
 
The investigator or qualified designee will at study visits as specified in the Trial Flow Chart 
(Section 12).  During dosing visits, vital signs should be assessed once prior to initiating 
treatment that day.Vital signs should include temperature, pulse, respiratory rate, weight and 
blood pressure.  Height will be measured at screening only. 
12.3.5 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Scale 
 
The investigator or qualified designee will assess ECOG status (see Section 19.1) at at study 
visits as specified in the Trial Flow Chart.  On treatment days, ECOG status should be 
assessed pre-dose. After Cycle 8 assessment of ECOG status will be performed every other 
cycle in conjunction with the directed or full physical exam. 
12.3.6 Laboratory Procedures/Assessments 
 
Details regarding specific laboratory procedures/assessments to be performed in this trial are 
provided below.  Laboratory Safety Evaluations (Hematology, Chemistry and Urinalysis) 
Laboratory tests for hematology, chemistry, urinalysis, and others are specified in Table 13.   

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
56
Table 13: Laboratory Tests 
 
Hematology 
Chemistry 
Urinalysis 
Other 
Hematocrit 
Albumin 
Blood 
Serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin† 
Hemoglobin 
Alkaline phosphatase 
Glucose 
  (β-hCG)† 
Platelet count 
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 
Protein 
PT (INR) 
WBC (total and differential) 
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 
Specific gravity  
aPTT 
Red Blood Cell Count 
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 
Microscopic exam (If abnormal)  
Free thriiodothyronine (T3) 
Absolute Neutrophil Count 
Carbon Dioxide ‡ 
results are noted 
Free tyroxine (T4) 
 
  (CO2 or biocarbonate) 
Urine pregnancy test † 
Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) 
 
Uric Acid 
 
 
 
Calcium 
 
 
 
Chloride 
 
Blood for correlative studies 
 
Glucose 
 
  
 
Phosphorus 
 
  
 
Potassium   
 
  
 
Sodium 
 
  
 
Magnesium 
 
  
 
Total Bilirubin 
 
  
 
Direct Bilirubin (If total bilirubin is 
elevated above the upper limit of 
normal) 
 
 
 
Total protein 
 
 
 
Blood Urea Nitrogen 
 
 
† Perform on women of childbearing potential only. If urine pregnancy results cannot be confirmed as negative, a serum pregnancy test will be required.   
‡ If considered standard of care in your region. 

 
After Cycle 1, pre-dose laboratory procedures can be conducted up to 72 hours prior to dosing.  
Results must be reviewed by the investigator or qualified designee and found to be acceptable 
prior to each dose of trial treatment.  
 
12.3.7 Research Sample Evaluations 
 
12.3.7.1 
Blood Collection for T-cell subsets/PBMCs and Serum/Plasma for Banking 
 
Sample collection, storage and shipment instructions are provided in the Laboratory Manual. 
 
12.3.7.2 
Blood Collection for Germline Sequencing 
 
Sample collection, storage and shipment instructions are provided in the Laboratory Manual. 
 
12.3.7.3 
Blood Collection for HLA Typing 
 
Sample collection, storage and shipment instructions are provided in the Laboratory Manual. 
 
 
12.4 
Other Procedures 
 
12.4.1 Withdrawal/Discontinuation 
 
When a subject discontinues/withdraws prior to trial completion, all applicable activities 
scheduled for the final trial visit should be performed at the time of discontinuation.  Any 
adverse events which are present at the time of discontinuation/withdrawal should be followed in 
accordance with the safety requirements outlined in Section 10.2.  Subjects who a) attain a CR or 
b) complete 24 months of treatment with pembrolizumab may discontinue treatment.  After 
discontinuing treatment following assessment of CR, these subjects should return to the site for a 
Safety Follow-up Visit (Section 12.5.1) and then proceed to the Follow-Up Period of the study 
(Section 12.5.2). 
 
12.5 
Visit Requirements 
 
Visit requirements are outlined in Section 12 - Trial Flow Chart.   Specific procedure-related 
details are provided therein. 
 
12.5.1 Safety Follow-Up Visit 
 
The mandatory Safety Follow-Up Visit should be conducted approximately 30 days after the last 
dose of trial treatment or before the initiation of a new anti-cancer treatment, whichever comes 
first.  All AEs that occur prior to the Safety Follow-Up Visit should be recorded.  Subjects with 
an AE of Grade > 1 will be followed until the resolution of the AE to Grade 0-1 or until the 
beginning of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, whichever occurs first.  SAEs and ECIs (Events of 
Clinical Interest) that occur within 90 days of the end of treatment or before initiation of a new 
anti-cancer treatment should also be followed and recorded.   

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58
12.5.2 Follow-up Visits 
 
Subjects who discontinue trial treatment for a reason other than disease progression will move 
into the Follow-Up Phase and should be assessed every 8 weeks (56 ± 7 days) by radiologic 
imaging to monitor disease status.  Every effort should be made to collect information regarding 
disease status until the start of new anti-neoplastic therapy, disease progression, death, or end of 
the study. 
 
12.5.3 Survival Follow-up 
 
Once a subject experiences confirmed disease progression or starts a new anti-cancer therapy, the 
subject moves into the survival follow-up phase and should be contacted by telephone every 12 
weeks (+/- 1 week) to assess for survival status until death, withdrawal of consent, or the end of 
the study, whichever occurs first.  
 
13. MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT 
 
13.1 
Antitumor Effect – Solid Tumors 
 
For the purposes of this study, patients should be re-evaluated for response every 9 weeks while 
on active treatment. In addition to a baseline scan, confirmatory scans should also be obtained 
not less than 4 weeks following initial documentation of objective response. 
 
Response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the new international criteria 
proposed by the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline 
(version 1.1) [31].  Changes in the largest diameter (unidimensional measurement) of the tumor 
lesions and the shortest diameter in the case of malignant lymph nodes are used in the RECIST 
criteria. 
 
 
13.2 
Duration of Response 
 
Duration of overall response: The duration of overall response is measured from the time 
measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that 
recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive 
disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). 
 
The duration of overall CR is measured from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR 
until the first date that progressive disease is objectively documented. 
 
 
Duration of stable disease: Stable disease is measured from the start of the treatment until the 
criteria for progression are met, taking as reference the smallest measurements recorded since the 
treatment started, including the baseline measurements.  
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
59
13.3 
Response Review 
 
Objective response to study treatment will be assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria [59] by a study 
radiologist. Partial and complete responses will be confirmed by a repeat imaging occurring at 
least 4 weeks after the initial identification of response; unconfirmed responses will be 
considered stable or progressive disease dependent on results of the second CT scan. Durable 
clinical benefit (DCB) will be defined as stable disease or response (complete or partial) lasting 
longer than 6 months.  No durable benefit (NDB) will be defined as progression of disease ≤ 6 
months of beginning therapy. For patients with ongoing response to study therapy, progression-
free survival will be censored at the date of the most recent imaging evaluation. For alive 
patients, overall survival will be censored at the date of last known contact.  
 
13.4 
Unblinding Procedures 
 
This is an open-label trial; therefore, the Sponsor, investigator and subject will know the 
treatment administered. 
13.5 
Stopping Rules  
 
Early trial termination will be the result of the criteria specified below: 
 
1. Quality or quantity of data recording is inaccurate or incomplete 
2. Poor adherence to protocol and regulatory requirements 
3. Incidence or severity of adverse drug reaction in this or other studies indicates a potential 
health hazard to subjects 
4. Plans to modify or discontinue the development of the study drug 
 
In the event of Merck decision to no longer supply study drug, ample notification will be 
provided so that appropriate adjustments to subject treatment can be made. 
 
 
14. DATA REPORTING / REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 
 
Adverse event lists, guidelines, and instructions for AE reporting can be found in Section 10 
(Adverse Events: List and Reporting Requirements).  The Data Safety Monitoring Plan is 
described in Section 14.3. 
 
14.1 
Data Collection 
 
The Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center has an electronic clinical trials and data 
management system (CTMS) that will be used for data collection. CRFs for the study will be 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
60
built into the CTMS for data entry. The system has full auditing capabilities which is web-based 
and housed on a server in a fully HIPAA compliant server room with restricted access and video 
camera monitoring.  All users must login with their own application username and password.  
Users off campus must first access the Virtual Private Network with their assigned campus 
username and password and then use their application credentials.  Users are only able to see 
study information if they are indicated as study personnel in our electronic IRB system. Users are 
limited to access based on the role assigned in their corresponding protocol.  Subject data is 
entered directly into the system, which (in the case of Columbia subjects) confirms the correct 
identity of patients via an interface with the electronic medical patient index.  Staff with the 
appropriate IRB defined roles can run reports within the system for reporting purposes. 
 
14.2 
Data Reporting 
 
Case Report Forms will be completed for each subject enrolled into the clinical study through the 
CTMS. It is the investigator’s responsibility for ensuring that all clinical and laboratory data 
entered on the corresponding CRFs are complete, accurate and authentic. 
 
14.3 
Data and Safety Monitoring Committee 
 
The NCI-approved Data Safety and Monitoring Committee (DSMC) of the Herbert Irving 
Comprehensive Cancer Center (HICCC) will monitor every subject who receives treatment on 
this protocol for toxicity. This protocol will adhere to the policies of the currently approved 
HICCC Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP), which is in accordance with NCI and 
CUMC-IRB policy and guidelines.  The committee is chair is appointed by the HICCC Director. 
The committee consists of HICCC faculty and staff with expertise in oncology, research 
pharmacy, research nursing, and data management. The DSMC convenes twice a month to 
review patient safety and the conduct of the trial. The PI will submit data and safety monitoring 
reports to the DSMC at a frequency to be determined by the DSMC based on risk to the subjects. 
 
At the time of renewal, the study team will submit the most recent DSMC approval letter for 
safety review to the CUMC IRB. Any modifications that are required by the DSMC to ensure 
patient safety will be submitted to the IRB. All protocol deviations, violations, and eligibility 
waivers will be submitted to and approved by the DSMC prior to being reported to the IRB. All 
study data reviewed and discussed during these meetings will be kept confidential.  
 
For multicenter research, the principal investigator will assure that there is a mechanism in place 
to distribute the report to all participating investigators for submission to their local IRB.  The 
report will document that a review of data and outcomes across all centers took place on a given 
date.  It will summarize the DSMC’s review of the cumulative toxicities reported from all 
participating sites without specific disclosure by treatment arm.  It will also inform site 
investigators of the study the DSMC’s conclusion with respect to progress or need for 
modification of the protocol.   
 
14.4 
Quality Control and Quality Assurance 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
61
Independent monitoring of the clinical study for protocol and GCP compliance will be conducted 
periodically by the CPDM Compliance Core on behalf of the HICCC DSMC.  Additionally, the 
Compliance Oversight Committee of the IRB at Columbia University Medical Center may audit 
the study at any time per institutional policies and procedures. The investigator-sponsor and 
Columbia University Medical Center will permit direct access of the study monitors and 
appropriate regulatory authorities to the study data and to the corresponding source data and 
documents to verify the accuracy of this data. 
 
A risk-based approach will be used by the Compliance Core to determine the frequency, number 
of subject charts, and data elements to be monitored. The Compliance Coordinator will review 
the study status and summarize enrollment, toxicities, SAEs/UPs, dose escalation, statistical 
endpoints (e.g., stopping rules), etc. for the full DSMC membership at the regularly scheduled 
meetings.   
 
Internal On-site Monitoring: 
 
 Initial, recurrent, and close-out on-site monitoring visits will also be conducted at remote 
clinical sites, as appropriate/feasible. Other sites will have monitoring performed 
remotely (see below for further details). 
 
 The study Monitoring Visit Log will be completed and signed by the monitor and the 
PI/CRNP/CRN and/or CRC and will be filed in the regulatory binder. 
 
 The Compliance Coordinator will communicate with the site coordinator/Site Principle 
Investigator to schedule the monitoring visit and arrange for access to study materials 
and documentation. 
 
 The assigned Compliance Coordinator will monitor IIT trials within 1 month after the 
first subject is enrolled and throughout the life of the study to ensure that the study is 
being conducted in accordance with the protocol, GCP, applicable federal and local 
regulations, and per all applicable SOPs. The Compliance Coordinator is responsible to 
notify the PI and CRNP/CRN/CRC of upcoming monitor visits and convey what 
information and documentation will be required for the visit(s).  The Compliance 
Coordinator is responsible for verifying that informed consent is properly obtained, 
eligibility is met (via the central registration process), and all study procedures are 
conducted according to the study protocol. The Compliance Coordinator will also verify 
that the data reported in the CRF’s accurately reflect source documents, that all toxicities 
have been reported to date, and that all SAE’s/UPs/deviations/violations have been 
reported according to local IRB and HICCC DSMC requirements. The Compliance 
Coordinator will issue queries and ensure resolution in a timely and efficient manner.  
The Compliance Coordinator will also monitor for applicable regulatory compliance and 
research pharmacy compliance (if applicable) and communicate any deficiencies as 
appropriate. 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
62
14.5 
Confidentiality 
Information about study subjects will be kept confidential and managed according to the 
requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  Those 
regulations require a signed subject authorization informing the subject of the following:  
 What protected health information (PHI) will be collected from subjects in this study 
 Who will have access to that information and why 
 Who will use or disclose that information 
 The rights of a research subject to revoke their authorization for use of their PHI 
In the event that a subject revokes authorization to collect or use PHI, the investigator, by 
regulation, retains the ability to use all information collected prior to the revocation of subject 
authorization.  For subjects that have revoked authorization to collect or use PHI, attempts 
should be made to obtain permission to collect at least vital status (e.g., that the subject is alive) 
at the end of their scheduled study period. 
The subject binders will be maintained with in the CPDM offices, a secured floor within the 
Herbert Irving Pavilion and only the investigator  and study staff will have access to the file. 
14.6 
Source Documents 
 
Source data is all information, original records of clinical findings, observations, or other 
activities in a clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial.  Source 
data are contained in source documents   Examples of these original documents, and data records 
include: hospital records, clinical and office charts, laboratory notes, memoranda, subjects’ 
diaries or evaluation checklists, pharmacy dispensing records, recorded data from automated 
instruments, copies or transcriptions certified after verification as being accurate and complete, 
microfiches, photographic negatives, microfilm or magnetic media, x-rays, subject files, and 
records kept at the pharmacy, at the laboratories, and at medico-technical departments involved 
in the clinical trial. 
 
14.7 
Records Retention 
 
Records relating to a specific research activity, including research records collected by 
investigators, must be maintained for at least three years after completion of the research (45 
CFR 46.115(b); 21 CFR 56.115(b); 21 CFR 312.62). This minimum retention period applies 
whether or not any subjects were enrolled in the study. 
 
If the research is FDA regulated, records should be retained for at least two years after approval 
of the investigational agent by FDA; if it is not approved, records should be retained at least two 
years after the study is terminated and FDA is notified (note the additional requirement below for 
clinical research studies). 
 
Clinical records, including consent forms that document clinical intervention or clinical 
diagnostic procedure research-related procedures, must be retained in medical records by the 
institution for at least seven years, per CUMC and NYP policy which is based on state law. 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
63
14.8 
Compliance with Trial Registration and Results Posting Requirements 
 
Under the terms of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) and the 
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), the Sponsor of the trial is solely 
responsible for determining whether the trial and its results are subject to the requirements for 
submission to the Clinical Trials Data Bank, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.  Information posted 
will allow subjects to identify potentially appropriate trials for their disease conditions and 
pursue participation by calling a central contact number for further information on appropriate 
trial locations and trial site contact information.     
 
 
15. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
 
15.1 
Study Design/Endpoints 
 
This will be a 3-arm, multi-center, open-label, non-randomized biomarker trial of 
pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-naïve, advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoint will 
be percentage of durable clinical benefit (DCB) versus no durable benefit (NDB) within each of 
the treatment arms. 
 
Secondary endpoints will include objective response rate (ORR), progression free-survival 
(PFS), and overall survival (OS). Other exploratory endpoints of interest include: duration of 
response and duration of stable disease. 
 
Power and Sample Size 
 
A sample size of 30 subjects in each arm achieves 80% power to identify difference as low as 
40-50% in DCB rates, between low and high mutation load groups. The power was calculated 
assuming an overall rate of DCB to pembrolizumab in unselected patients with NSCLC of 
~20%. However, to be noted that the main, hypothesis generating objective of the study is to 
assess if mutation load can be used as a predictor of DCB rate, and if the case, identify the 
optimal cutpoint with either pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab in combination with 2 
cycles of chemotherapy. 
 
Statistical Analysis: 
 
The objective response and DCB rates will be reported as estimated proportions with 95% 
confidence intervals. The relationship between mutation load (continuous form) and clinical 
outcome (DCB), will first be tested in a regression model. The distribution of the continuous 
variable will then be explored and mutation load will be categorized (e.g., “low” versus “high” 
load) using different cutpoints such as median (or other quartiles) and/or other known and 
published cutpoints (e.g. TCGA) of the distribution of non-synonymous mutations per sample. 
For example, mutational landscape was significantly associated with clinical sensitivity to PD-1 
blockade in NSCLC based on a cutoff of 200 mutations per sample [17]. The receiver operating 
characteristic (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) will be computed and compared for the 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
64
different cutpoints. The ‘optimal’ cutpoint will be chosen as the one with the highest AUC 
(sensitivity/specificity) of at least 0.70. 
 Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test will be used to estimate and compare the PFS and OS 
among the three arms. Median PFS and OS will be provided with 95% CI. Additionally, Cox 
regressions might be employed to quantify the effect (HR) of several predictors (including 
dichotomized mutation load) on probabilities of progression-free and overall survival. 
 
Candidate neoantigens: Candidate neoantigens will be broadly defined as those mutations that 
generate peptides that have <500nM binding affinity to patient specific MHC class I alleles. 
Analysis will be further refined by IEDB to identify high-affinity neoantigens predicted to elicit 
T-cell response. Using netMHC and IEDC, a list of candidate neoantigens will be generated, and 
Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to compare the quantity of putative neoantigens between the 
DCB versus NCB groups. Those neoantigens significantly associated with DCB status 
(controlling for false-discovery rate of 5%) will be validated in further studies. Data will be 
compared to TCGA data to see if there are mutated sequences enriched in either the DCB or 
NCB group. The presence of neoantigen-specific peripheral blood and (if possible) intratumoral 
T-cells will be quantified in pre- and on-treatment specimens. We will present these data 
graphically and summarize them for the DCB and NCB groups. We are interested in whether 
neoantigen-specific T-cells exhibit patterns of change between the two evaluations that are 
different between DCB and NCB patients. The presence of neoantigen-specific lymphocytes will 
be quantified in samples collected at baseline and serially while on treatment. Their trajectory 
will be presented graphically, summarized separately for DCB and NCB groups. The mean 
differences between the pre-post values will be compared between the DCB and NCB groups 
using two-sided t-tests. 
 
Tumor expression of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory ligands and MHC expression will be 
analyzed and quantified in pre-treatment and on-treatment tissue samples. All measures, as well 
as percent and absolute changes between pre- and during treatment, will be summarized 
separately for DCB versus NCB patients. Associations between pre-treatment values and DCB 
status will be explored using two-sided t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests (for non-normal data)  
 
Exploratory analyses: Additional post-hoc, exploratory assessments may be performed and 
reported as hypothesis generating with p-values not adjusted for multiple comparisons. 
 
 
15.2 
Size/Accrual Rate 
 
The study plans to accrue 90 patients study-wide at up to 5 sites. The accrual rate is expected to 
be 10 patients per month.   
 
15.3 
Stratification Factors 
 
Not Applicable 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
65
15.4 
Reporting and Exclusions 
 
15.4.1 Evaluation of toxicity   
 
All patients will be evaluable for toxicity from the time of their first treatment with the study 
drug. 
 
15.4.2  Evaluation of response   
 
All patients included in the study must be assessed for response to treatment, even if there are 
major protocol treatment deviations or if they are ineligible.  Each patient will be assigned one of 
the following categories:  1) complete response, 2) partial response, 3) stable disease, 4) 
progressive disease, 5) early death from malignant disease, 6) early death from toxicity, 7) early 
death because of other cause, or 9) unknown (not assessable, insufficient data).  [Note:  By 
arbitrary convention, category 9 usually designates the “unknown” status of any type of data in a 
clinical database.] 
 
All of the patients who met the eligibility criteria (with the possible exception of those who 
received no study medication) should be included in the main analysis of the response rate.  
Patients in response categories 4-9 should be considered to have a treatment failure (disease 
progression).  Thus, an incorrect treatment schedule or drug administration does not result in 
exclusion from the analysis of the response rate.  Precise definitions for categories 4-9 will be 
protocol specific.  
 
All conclusions should be based on all eligible patients.  Subanalyses may then be performed on 
the basis of a subset of patients, excluding those for whom major protocol deviations have been 
identified (e.g., early death due to other reasons, early discontinuation of treatment, major 
protocol violations, etc.).  However, these subanalyses may not serve as the basis for drawing 
conclusions concerning treatment efficacy, and the reasons for excluding patients from the 
analysis should be clearly reported.  The 95% confidence intervals should also be provided.  
 
16. PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS [MULTI CENTER STUDIES] 
 
This study is to be conducted in accordance with applicable government regulations and 
Institutional research policies and procedures. 
 
This protocol and any amendments will be submitted to a properly constituted Institutional 
Review Board (IRB), in agreement with local legal prescriptions, for formal approval of the 
study conduct.  The decision of the IRB concerning the conduct of the study will be made in 
writing to the investigator and a copy of this decision will be obtained before commencement of 
this study.  
 
All subjects for this study will be provided a consent form describing this study and providing 
sufficient information for subjects to make an informed decision about their participation in this 
study. This consent form will be submitted with the protocol for review and approval by the IRB 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
66
for the study.  The formal consent of a subject, using the IRB-approved consent form, must be 
obtained before that subject is submitted to any study procedure.  This consent form must be 
signed by the subject or legally acceptable surrogate, as outlined in the IRB approved protocol, 
and the investigator-designated research professional obtaining the consent.  
 
17. STUDY FINANCES 
 
17.1 
Conflict of Interest 
 
Any investigator who has a conflict of interest with this study (patent ownership, royalties, or 
financial gain greater than the minimum allowable by their institution, etc.) must have the 
conflict reviewed by the Columbia University Conflict of Interest Committee with a Committee-
sanctioned conflict management plan that has been reviewed and approved prior to participation 
in this study.  All CUMC investigators will follow the University conflict of interest policy. 
 
18. PUBLICATION PLAN 
 
Neither the complete nor any part of the results of the study carried out under this protocol, nor 
any of the information provided by the sponsor for the purposes of performing the study, will be 
published or passed on to any third party without the consent of the study sponsor.  Any 
investigator involved with this study is obligated to provide the sponsor with complete test 
results and all data derived from the study. 
 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
67
19. APPENDICES 
 
19.1 
ECOG Performance Status 
 
Grade 
Description 
0 
Normal activity. Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease 
performance without restriction. 
1 
Symptoms, but ambulatory. Restricted in physically strenuous 
activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or 
sedentary nature (e.g., light housework, office work). 
2 
In bed <50% of the time. Ambulatory and capable of all self-care, 
but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 
50% of waking hours. 
3 
In bed >50% of the time. Capable of only limited self-care, confined 
to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 
4 
100% bedridden. Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-
care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 
5 
Dead. 
* As published in Am. J. Clin. Oncol.:  Oken, M.M., Creech, R.H., Tormey, D.C., 
Horton, J., Davis, T.E., McFadden, E.T., Carbone, P.P.: Toxicity And Response 
Criteria Of The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649-655, 
1982. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Robert Comis M.D., Group Chair. 
 
19.2 
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0 (CTCAE) 
 
The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for 
Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for adverse event reporting. 
(http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html) 
 
19.3 
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 Criteria for 
Evaluating Response in Solid Tumors 
 
RECIST version 1.1 [31] will be used in this study for assessment of tumor response. While 
either CT or MRI may be utilized, as per RECIST 1.1, CT is the preferred imaging technique in 
this study. 
 
 
19.4 
Guidelines for Affiliate Institutions in Multicenter Studies 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
68
19.4.1 Multi-site Communication: 
 
The CPDM Office at CUMC provides administration, data management, and organizational 
support for the affiliate sites in the conduct of a multicenter clinical trial.  The CPDM Office will 
coordinate, at minimum, regularly scheduled conference calls with affiliate sites.  
The following issues will be discussed, as appropriate:  
 
 Enrollment information  
 Cohort updates (e.g., DLTs) 
 Adverse events (e.g., new adverse events and updates on unresolved adverse events and 
new safety information) 
 Protocol violations 
 Other issues affecting the conduct of the study 
 
19.4.2 New Protocol Distribution, IRB Submission, Modifications, and Annual 
Renewals 
 
 Protocol specific documents are distributed to affiliate sites once CUMC IRB approval 
has been obtained.  
 The affiliate site must submit a draft of site specific revisions to protocol and/or consent 
form documents for review and approval by the sponsor-investigator prior to submission 
to the local IRB. Draft documents should be sent to the study specific email address. The 
site will be provided confirmation that they are approved to submit to their local IRB.  
 Protocol amendments must be approved by the affiliate site’s local IRB within 90 days of 
distribution to the site by the sponsor-investigator.  
 
19.5 
Regulatory Documents: 
 
19.5.1 Prior to Site Initiation: 
 
Sponsor-Investigator will ensure that proper requests are made of sites and that the following 
documentation is collected, prior to the initiation of an affiliate site.   
 
 CV of PI, Co-I’s and other research staff listed on FDA 1572 (signed and dated copy 
within 2 years) 
 Medical Licenses of PI and Co-I’s (current copy) 
 Human subjects training certificates for PI and Co-I’s 
 CLIA/Laboratory  Certifications for Local Laboratories listed on FDA 1572 
 Local Laboratory Director’s CV and License 
 Local Laboratory Reference Ranges  
 IRB roster or statement of compliance 
 FDA Form 1572, if applicable (wet ink originals required) 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
69
 Financial Disclosure forms for all members listed on FDA 1572 (wet ink originals 
required) 
 
Ongoing Regulatory Documentation:  Sponsor-Investigator will ensure that proper requests are 
made of sites and that the following documentation is collected throughout the course of the 
study. 
 IRB approval letters for all protocol modifications and all renewals 
 IRB-approved consent forms 
 Current IRB roster, if statement of compliance is not provided as part of site initiation  
 FDA Form 1572, if applicable as updates are required 
 Updated investigator and site information where relevant (e.g., CV, medical licensure 
and Financial Disclosure for new sub-investigator, local laboratory information) 
 
Regulatory documents may be sent to Q5450@columbia.edu or to the following address if wet 
ink originals are required: 
 
Clinical Protocol & Data Management Office 
161 Fort Washington Ave. 
Herbert Irving Pavilion 
Mezzanine Level, M-203 
New York, NY 10032 
 
19.5.2 Site activation 
 
Columbia University will schedule a site initiation visit once IRB approval has been submitted 
from the affiliate site.  
 
 
19.6 
Protocol Deviation/Subject Waiver request for Affiliate Sites: 
 
The Affiliate site MUST submit a prospective deviation request to the CUMC lead PI for review 
and submission to the HICCC DSMC and CUMC IRB. Approvals must be obtained from all 
entities prior to implementation at the Affiliate site.  If a prospective protocol deviation request is 
submitted for review (from an Affiliate site), the PI/site memo(s), HICCC DSMC approval(s) 
and correspondence and CUMC IRB eligibility deviation approval letter(s)/correspondence 
should be forwarded to the Affiliate site for documentation. The Affiliate site is also required to 
obtain prospective local IRB approval as per institutional policies/procedures prior to 
implementing the proposed deviation. All documents and determinations must be clearly 
documented in the study subject’s medical record, research chart and regulatory binder, as 
described. Please note that the HICCC DSMC will no longer be approving deviations to 
eligibility criteria.  
 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
70
19.7 
Guidelines for Affiliate Site Monitoring  
 
19.7.1 On-Site MCT Monitoring:  
 
1. Initial, recurrent, and close-out on-site monitoring visits will also be conducted at 
Affiliate sites, as appropriate/feasible. Other sites will have monitoring performed 
remotely (see below for further details). 
2. The Compliance Coordinator will communicate with the Affiliate site coordinator/Site 
Principle Investigator to schedule the monitoring visit and arrange for access to study 
materials and documentation. 
3. The Compliance Coordinator will monitor IIT trials within 1 month after the first subject 
is enrolled at the Affiliate site and throughout the life of the study to ensure that the study 
is being conducted in accordance with the protocol, GCP, applicable federal and local 
regulations, and per all applicable SOPs. The Compliance Coordinator is responsible to 
notify the participating site PI and CRNP/CRN/CRC of upcoming monitor visits and 
convey what information and documentation will be required for the visit(s).  The 
Compliance Coordinator is responsible for verifying that informed consent is properly 
obtained, eligibility is met (via the central registration process), and all study procedures 
are conducted according to the study protocol. The Compliance Coordinator will also 
verify that the data reported in the CRF’s accurately reflect source documents, that all 
toxicities have been reported to date, and that all SAE’s/UPs/deviations/violations have 
been reported according to Coordinating Center, local IRB and HICCC DSMC 
requirements. The Compliance Coordinator will issue queries and ensure resolution in a 
timely and efficient manner.  The Compliance Coordinator will also monitor for 
applicable regulatory compliance and research pharmacy compliance (if applicable) and 
communicate any deficiencies as appropriate. 
 
4. An SIV (or) teleconference will be scheduled and conducted prior to study drug being 
made available (if applicable) and before any subjects are enrolled on a study at the 
Affiliate site. 
 
19.7.2 MCT Remote Monitoring:  
 
 When necessary (due to logistical constraints), Affiliate sites will be monitored remotely 
by a designated Compliance Coordinator. Sites will be informed of this remote 
monitoring process on a site by site basis. 
 Affiliate sites will be monitored by the Compliance Coordinator on both a regulatory 
level, as well as a clinical data/source documentation review level. 
 Redacted source documents (applicable to supporting the protocol specific CRF data 
requirements) will be sent to the designated Compliance Coordinator via fax or secure 
email for all subjects enrolled at Affiliate sites. Timelines for submission procedures will 
be defined on a case by case basis.   

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
71
 The Compliance Coordinator will review all submitted redacted source documents 
against the data entered on the protocol specific CRFs. The Compliance Coordinator will 
issue queries when/if necessary. 
 The Affiliate site research staff will respond to queries within 30 days. If queries remain 
outstanding, the Compliance Coordinator will send a delinquent query reminder for the 
outstanding items. 
 The remote monitoring procedures will include review of applicable redacted source 
documentation and supporting applicable documents to determine compliance regarding: 
a. Informed consent procedures 
b. Eligibility criteria 
c. Protocol specific treatment compliance 
d. Protocol specific toxicity/outcome documentation/compliance 
e. Protocol specific schedule of events (e.g., baseline visits, pre-treatment, on study, 
follow-up) 
f. Participating site IRB documents (e.g., IRB amendment approvals, annual 
renewals, SAE/UP submissions, violation/deviation submissions, INDSR 
submissions, etc). 
g. Required specimen submissions (e.g., tissue specimens, research blood 
specimens, etc.) 
h. Pharmacy accountability records 
i. Adherence to the CRF submission timeframes to CUMC (within the protocol 
specified timeframes) 
 Affiliate site remote monitoring reports will be sent to the lead PI, HICCC DSMC, and 
Affiliate sites after each remote monitoring review. Reports will include information 
regarding data submission timeliness/accuracy, protocol adherence items, query 
resolution status, regulatory status, and overall Affiliate site performance. These reports 
will be generated by the Compliance Coordinator and reviewed with the Compliance 
Core Manager prior to dissemination. 
 
 
 
19.8 
Adverse event reporting 
 
Sponsor reporting: Notifying participating investigators at affiliate sites of adverse events 
 
It is the responsibility of the study sponsor to notify all affiliate sites, in a written IND safety 
report, of any adverse event associated with the use of the drug that is both serious and 
unexpected, as well as any finding from tests in laboratory animals that suggest a significant risk 
for human subjects.  Additionally, sponsors are also required to identify in IND safety reports all 
previous reports concerning similar adverse events and to analyze the significance of the current 
event in light of the previous reports. 
 
19.9 
Serious Adverse Event Reporting 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
72
Each participating investigator is required to abide by the reporting requirements set by 
Columbia University Medical Center. The study must be conducted in compliance with FDA 
regulations, local safety reporting requirements, and reporting requirements of the principal 
investigator. 
 
Participating investigators must report each serious adverse event to the Columbia University 
Medical Center Overall Principal Investigator within 24 hours of learning of the occurrence using 
the SAE Report Form. In the event that the participating investigator does not become aware of 
the serious adverse event immediately (e.g., participant sought treatment elsewhere), the 
participating investigator is to report the event within 24 hours after learning of it and document 
the time of his or her first awareness of the adverse event. Report serious adverse events by 
telephone, email or facsimile to: 
 
Naiyer Rizvi, MD 
 
 
177 Fort Washington Ave 
New York NY, 10032 
646-317-6344 
212-305-3035 
q5450@columbia.edu 
 
The participating investigator must provide follow-up information on the serious adverse event 
until resolution or end of the event. Follow-up information should describe whether the event has 
resolved or continues, if and how the event was treated, and whether the participant will continue 
or discontinue study participation. 
 
Follow-up information is sent to the same person to whom the original SAE Report Form was 
sent, using a new SAE Report Form stating that this is a follow- up to the previously reported 
SAE and giving the date of the original report. Each re-occurrence, complication, or progression 
of the original event should be reported as a follow-up to that event regardless of when it occurs. 
The follow-up information should describe whether the event has resolved or continues, if and 
how it was treated, and whether the subject continued or withdrew from study participation or if 
study drug was interrupted or discontinued. 
 
If the SAE is not previously documented in the Investigator’s Brochure for the study drug 
(new occurrence) and is thought to be related to the investigational agent, the sponsor-
investigator may urgently require further information from the investigator for reporting to 
Health Authorities. 
 
 
19.10 Non-Serious Adverse Event Reporting 
 
Non-serious adverse events will be reported to the Columbia University Medical Center Overall 
Principal Investigator on the toxicity Case Report Forms in real time. 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
73
19.11 Reporting to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Data and Safety 
Monitoring Committee 
 
All Unanticipated Problems (UPs) will be reported to the CUMC IRB.  SAEs not constituting 
UPs will reported to the HICCC DSMC.   
 
Each affiliate site will be responsible for safety reporting to their local IRB.  Investigators are 
responsible for complying with their local IRB’s reporting requirements, though must submit the 
required reports to their IRB no later than 7 calendar days following the occurrence of the UP or 
the Principal’s Investigator’s acquiring knowledge of the UP.  Copies of each report and 
documentation of IRB notification and receipt must be included in the regulatory binder. 
 
Affiliate sites will be reporting SAEs directly to the Principal Investigator. The Multi-Center 
Core will report the events to the DSMC on behalf of affiliate sites.  
 
Expected AEs must be reported at the time of continuing review of a protocol. 
 
19.12 Guidelines for Processing IND Safety Reports  
 
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations require sponsors of clinical studies to 
notify the FDA and all participating investigators of any serious and unexpected adverse 
experiences that are possibly related to the investigational agent. The CUMC Principal 
Investigator will review all applicable IND Safety Reports and has the responsibly for 
forwarding the IND Safety Reports to the Affiliate Institutions. The Affiliate Institution 
investigators are to review, send a copy to their IRB according to their local IRB’s policies and 
procedures, and file a copy with their regulatory documents. All Affiliate site INDSR 
submissions, along with IRB acknowledgment (per local policies and procedures) are to be 
forwarded to CUMC for placement within the trial master file. 
 
19.13 Reporting to Hospital Risk Management / Data Reporting 
 
Affiliate Site investigators will report to their local Risk Management Office any subject safety 
reports or sentinel events that require reporting according to institutional policy. 
 
19.13.1 Confidentiality 
 
Each affiliate site will be assigned a site number. Each subject that signs consent should be 
assigned a unique code number consisting of site number followed by a number with each new 
subject being assigned the next sequential number (e.g., 04-10). All sites will be required to enter 
their data in the Velos eResearch, the Clinical Trial Management System used for all Cancer-
related clinical research at CUMC. All users must login with their own application username and 
password.  Users off campus must first access the Virtual Private Network with their assigned 
campus username and password and then use their application credentials.   
 
Subject confidentiality must be maintained according to HIPAA regulations and GCP 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
74
recommendations.  
 
Except when required by law, study information shared with persons and organizations outside 
of Columbia University Medical Center must not identify the patient by name, social security 
number, address, telephone number, or any other direct personal identifier. 
If the results of this research project are published or presented at a scientific or medical meeting, 
the patient not be identified. Otherwise, all results will be kept confidential and will not be 
divulged (except as required by law) without permission.  
 
19.13.2 Data Reporting Plan 
 
Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) is deeply committed to research integrity and 
strong credibility when it comes to the discovery of new treatment concepts, implementation of 
new clinical research techniques, and acceptance of its researcher's findings by the medical 
establishment. In accord with these ethics, CUMC encourages and supports its investigators in 
the sharing of final research data and/or details of newly developed clinical treatments. 
 
CUMC's policies that pertain to patient data sharing conform to CUMC IRB rules, local and state 
laws, and HIPAA privacy regulations. The primary reason for this is to protect the privacy of 
patients who participate in clinical trials. The data can be made available for continuing review 
by federal agencies upon request and for ongoing study safety reviews by the Principal 
Investigator, Statistician, Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMC), and, in other instances, 
the CUMC IRB. 
 
Data collected during the course of this clinical trial will primarily be shared with other 
investigators and University staff, the IRB, FDA, and other reporting agencies, and/or transferred 
to other collaborators.  Prior to transfer, the data collected must comply with, and must be 
limited by, the CUMC's guidelines for Protecting the Rights and Privacy of Human Subjects.  
  
19.13.3 Data Acquisition and Submission 
 
Informed consent, including HIPPA authorization, must be obtained on all subjects prior to their 
participation. Always keep the original signed and dated consent form, with the redacted source 
documents and eligibility checklist. Velos eResearch will be used as the electronic clinical trials 
and data management system. Affiliate sites will enter data directly into Velos eResearch via 
customized case report forms for the study. The research staff will generate reports from Velos 
eResearch to ensure timely submission of data by affiliate sites. This resource allows for the 
timely analysis of particular data sets for safety analysis. 
 
19.13.4 Record Keeping and Record Retention 
 
The Principal Investigator is required to maintain adequate records of the disposition of the drug, 
including dates, quantity, and use by subjects, as well as written records of the disposition of the 
drug when the study ends.   
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
75
The Principal Investigator is required to prepare and maintain adequate and accurate case 
histories that record all observations and other data pertinent to the investigation on each 
individual administered the investigational drug or employed as a control in the investigation. 
Case histories include the case report forms and supporting data including, for example, signed 
and dated consent forms and medical records including, for example, progress notes of the 
physician, the individual's hospital chart(s), and the nurses' notes. The case history for each 
individual shall document that informed consent was obtained prior to participation in the study. 
Study documentation includes all CRFs, data correction forms or queries, source documents, 
Sponsor-Investigator correspondence, monitoring logs/letters, and regulatory documents (e.g., 
protocol and amendments, CHR correspondence and approval, signed patient consent forms). 
Source documents include all recordings of observations or notations of clinical activities and all 
reports and records necessary for the evaluation and reconstruction of the clinical research study. 
In accordance with FDA regulations, the investigator shall retain records for a period of 2 years 
following the date a marketing application is approved for the drug for the indication for which it 
is being investigated; or, if no application is to be filed or if the application is not approved for 
such indication, until 2 years after the investigation is discontinued and FDA is notified. 
 
19.13.5 Data Sharing 
 
Some of data analysis are funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Thus, we are 
required to submit the genetic and/or clinical data in coded form to one or more databases 
managed by the NIH. The data may be the combined or individual data of many people. Any 
data that is submitted will not be labeled with patients name or other information that could be 
used to easily identify them. However, it is possible that the information from individuals’ 
genome, when combined with information from other public sources, could be used to identify 
them. We believe that this is unlikely to happen. 
 
19.14 Modified CT Imaging Protocols 
 
19.14.1 Modified Chest CT Imaging Protocol 
 
For each CT scan, there will be the following six imaging series reconstructed. 
For GE machine, the six series are (slice thickness/convolution kernel):  
1) 1.25mm/Standard, 2) 1.25mm/Lung, 3) 2.5mm/Standard, 4) 2.5mm/Lung, 5) 5mm/Standard, 
and 6) 5mm/Lung. 
For SIEMENS machine, the six series are: 
1) 1mm/B30f, 2) 1mm/B70f, 3) 3mm/B30f, 4) 3mm/B70f, 5) 5mm/B30f and 6) 5mm/B70f. 
 
All other CT scanning techniques / parameters will adopt the standard-of-care settings for the 
chest imaging protocol. 
 
19.14.2 Modified Abdominal CT imaging Protocol: 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
76
For each phase CT scan (e.g., pre-contrast, arterial phase and portal venous phases), there will be 
the following six imaging series reconstructed. 
 
For GE machine, the six series are:  
1) 1.25mm/Standard, 2) 1.25mm/Soft, 3) 2.5mm/Standard, 4) 2.5mm/Soft, 5) 5mm/Standard, 
and 6) 5mm/Soft. 
For SIEMENS machine, the six series are: 
1) 1mm/B30f, 2) 1mm/B20f, 3) 3mm/B30f, 4) 3mm/B20f, 5) 5mm/B30f and 6) 5mm/B20f. 
  
All other CT scanning techniques / parameters will adopt the standard-of-care settings for the 
abdominal imaging protocol. 
 
 
 
 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
77
20. REFERENCES 
 
1. 
Ferlay, J., et al., Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int 
J Cancer, 2010. 127(12): p. 2893-917. 
2. 
Spiro, S.G., et al., Chemotherapy versus supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung 
cancer: improved survival without detriment to quality of life. Thorax, 2004. 59(10): p. 
828-36. 
3. 
NSCLC_Meta-Analyses_Collaborative_Group, Chemotherapy in addition to supportive 
care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and 
meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials. J Clin 
Oncol, 2008. 26(28): p. 4617-25. 
4. 
Postmus, P.E., et al., The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of 
the M descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of lung 
cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2007. 2(8): p. 686-93. 
5. 
Detterbeck, F.C., D.J. Boffa, and L.T. Tanoue, The new lung cancer staging system. Chest, 
2009. 136(1): p. 260-71. 
6. 
Scagliotti, G.V., et al., Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin 
plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung 
cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(21): p. 3543-51. 
7. 
Ciuleanu, T., et al., Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus 
best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 
study. Lancet, 2009. 374(9699): p. 1432-40. 
8. 
Belani, C.P., et al., Quality of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer 
given maintenance treatment with pemetrexed versus placebo (H3E-MC-JMEN): results 
from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol, 2012. 13(3): p. 292-9. 
9. 
Paz-Ares, L., et al., Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus 
placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin 
for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, 
phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2012. 13(3): p. 247-55. 
10. 
Fidias, P.M., et al., Phase III study of immediate compared with delayed docetaxel after 
front-line therapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung 
cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(4): p. 591-8. 
11. 
Perol, M., et al., Randomized, phase III study of gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance 
therapy versus observation, with predefined second-line treatment, after cisplatin-
gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin 
Oncol, 2012. 30(28): p. 3516-24. 
12. 
Sandler, A., et al., Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell 
lung cancer. N Engl J Med, 2006. 355(24): p. 2542-50. 
13. 
Lynch, T.J., et al., Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying 
responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med, 2004. 350(21): p. 
2129-39. 
14. 
Paez, J.G., et al., EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to 
gefitinib therapy. Science, 2004. 304(5676): p. 1497-500. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
78
15. 
Pao, W., et al., EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never 
smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl 
Acad Sci U S A, 2004. 101(36): p. 13306-11. 
16. 
Kris, M.G., et al., Identification of driver mutations in tumor specimens from 1,000 patients 
with lung adenocarcinoma: The NCI’s Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC). J Clin 
Oncol 2011. 29: p. suppl; abstr CRA7506. 
17. 
Pao, W. and K.E. Hutchinson, Chipping away at the lung cancer genome. Nat Med, 2012. 
18(3): p. 349-51. 
18. 
Shaw, A.T., et al., Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. 
N Engl J Med, 2013. 368(25): p. 2385-94. 
19. 
Freeman, G.J., et al., Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 
family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med, 2000. 
192(7): p. 1027-34. 
20. 
Pardoll, D.M., The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev 
Cancer, 2012. 12(4): p. 252-64. 
21. 
Taube, J.M., et al., Colocalization of inflammatory response with B7-h1 expression in 
human melanocytic lesions supports an adaptive resistance mechanism of immune escape. 
Sci Transl Med, 2012. 4(127): p. 127ra37. 
22. 
Hodi, F.S., et al., Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. 
N Engl J Med, 2010. 363(8): p. 711-23. 
23. 
Robert, C., et al., Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in 
ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a 
phase 1 trial. Lancet, 2014. 
24. 
Topalian, S.L., et al., Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in 
cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(26): p. 2443-54. 
25. 
Langer, C.J., et al., Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for 
advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the 
open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol, 2016. 17(11): p. 1497-1508. 
26. 
Stratton, M.R., P.J. Campbell, and P.A. Futreal, The cancer genome. Nature, 2009. 
458(7239): p. 719-24. 
27. 
Hanahan, D. and R.A. Weinberg, The hallmarks of cancer. Cell, 2000. 100(1): p. 57-70. 
28. 
Alexandrov, L.B., et al., Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature, 
2013. 500(7463): p. 415-21. 
29. 
Schumacher, T.N. and R.D. Schreiber, Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science, 
2015. 348(6230): p. 69-74. 
30. 
Matsushita, H., et al., Cancer exome analysis reveals a T-cell-dependent mechanism of 
cancer immunoediting. Nature, 2012. 482(7385): p. 400-4. 
31. 
DuPage, M., et al., Endogenous T cell responses to antigens expressed in lung 
adenocarcinomas delay malignant tumor progression. Cancer Cell, 2011. 19(1): p. 72-85. 
32. 
DuPage, M., et al., Expression of tumour-specific antigens underlies cancer 
immunoediting. Nature, 2012. 482(7385): p. 405-9. 
33. 
Castle, J.C., et al., Exploiting the mutanome for tumor vaccination. Cancer Res, 2012. 
72(5): p. 1081-91. 
34. 
Snyder, A., et al., Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N 
Engl J Med, 2014. 371(23): p. 2189-99. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
79
35. 
Le, D.T., et al., PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. N Engl J 
Med, 2015. 372(26): p. 2509-20. 
36. 
Rizvi, N.A., et al., Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-
small cell lung cancer. Science, 2015. 
37. 
Emens, L.A. and G. Middleton, The interplay of immunotherapy and chemotherapy: 
harnessing potential synergies. Cancer Immunol Res, 2015. 3(5): p. 436-43. 
38. 
Merritt, R.E., et al., Cisplatin augments cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated antitumor 
immunity in poorly immunogenic murine lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003. 
126(5): p. 1609-17. 
39. 
Apetoh, L., et al., Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to 
anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nat Med, 2007. 13(9): p. 1050-9. 
40. 
Liu, S.V., et al., Safety and efficacy of MPDL3280A (anti-PDL1) in combination with 
platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung 
cancer (NSCLC). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015. 33(15_suppl): p. 8030-8030. 
41. 
Galluzzi, L., et al., Immunological Effects of Conventional Chemotherapy and Targeted 
Anticancer Agents. Cancer Cell, 2015. 28(6): p. 690-714. 
42. 
Socinski, M.A., et al., Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus 
solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced 
non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol, 2012. 30(17): p. 
2055-62. 
43. 
Li, H. and R. Durbin, Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler 
transform. Bioinformatics, 2009. 25(14): p. 1754-60. 
44. 
DePristo, M.A., et al., A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-
generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet, 2011. 43(5): p. 491-8. 
45. 
De Baets, G., et al., SNPeffect 4.0: on-line prediction of molecular and structural effects 
of protein-coding variants. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012. 40(Database issue): p. D935-9. 
46. 
Larson, D.E., et al., SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole 
genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 2012. 28(3): p. 311-7. 
47. 
Koboldt, D.C., et al., VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery 
in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res, 2012. 22(3): p. 568-76. 
48. 
Cibulskis, K., et al., Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and 
heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol, 2013. 31(3): p. 213-9. 
49. 
Robinson, J.T., et al., Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol, 2011. 29(1): p. 24-6. 
50. 
Sherry, S.T., M. Ward, and K. Sirotkin, dbSNP-database for single nucleotide 
polymorphisms and other classes of minor genetic variation. Genome Res, 1999. 9(8): p. 
677-9. 
51. 
NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP).http://evs.qs.washington.edu/EVS  Exome 
Variant Server. 
52. 
Via, M., C. Gignoux, and E.G. Burchard, The 1000 Genomes Project: new opportunities 
for research and social challenges. Genome Med, 2010. 2(1): p. 3. 
53. 
Liu, X., X. Jian, and E. Boerwinkle, dbNSFP v2.0: a database of human non-synonymous 
SNVs and their functional predictions and annotations. Hum Mutat, 2013. 34(9): p. E2393-
402. 

Columbia University Medical Center 
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center 
IRB AAAQ5450 -Version Date:16 MAY 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
80
54. 
Taube, J.M., et al., Differential Expression of Immune-Regulatory Genes Associated with 
PD-L1 Display in Melanoma: Implications for PD-1 Pathway Blockade. Clin Cancer Res, 
2015. 
55. 
Yuan, J., et al., CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell 
responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S 
A, 2008. 105(51): p. 20410-5. 
56. 
Rizvi, N.A., et al., Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to 
PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science, 2015. 348(6230): p. 124-8. 
57. 
Tumeh, P.C., et al., PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune 
resistance. Nature, 2014. 515(7528): p. 568-71. 
58. 
Smith, L.K., HLA typing by direct DNA sequencing. Methods Mol Biol, 2012. 882: p. 67-
86. 
59. 
Eisenhauer, E.A., et al., New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised 
RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer, 2009. 45(2): p. 228-47.