Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With 11C-ER176 to Delineate Macrophage Activation in Diabetic Gastroparesis
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Diabetes, Gastroparesis With Diabetes Mellitus
Sponsor: Mayo Clinic

 
 
Dynamic Positron Emission 
Tomography Imaging with 11C-
ER176 to Delineate 
Macrophage Activation in 
Diabetic Gastroparesis 
 
NCT04762719 
 
10/4/2021 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
Fig 1: Molecular structure of 
11C-ER176. 
Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography Imaging with 11C-ER176 to Delineate Macrophage Activation 
in Diabetic Gastroparesis 
A. Specific Aims 
Diabetic gastroparesis (DG) is a well-established complication of diabetes mellitus and results in significant 
morbidity for the patients1, 2. Mechanistic studies from diabetic animal models of delayed gastric emptying as 
well as molecular studies on human full-thickness gastric biopsies have significantly advanced our 
understanding of this disorder3-6. An innate immune dysregulation and resulting injury to the interstitial cells of 
Cajal (ICC) and other components of the enteric nervous system is central to the pathophysiology of DG7, 8. 
Specifically, hyperglycemic animal models have demonstrated that macrophages are critical for the 
development of delayed gastric emptying9, 10. A loss of anti-inflammatory macrophages associates with loss of 
ICC in both animal models and patients with DG. Our transcriptomic5 and proteomic6 studies in gastric full 
thickness biopsies from DG patients have also demonstrated macrophage-based immune dysregulation as the 
primary pathway altered. Although they have provided us seminal findings, widespread use of full-thickness 
biopsies can be challenging for assessment of neuromuscular immunopathology in the stomach. Additionally, 
these biopsies only provide assessment of a small area in an untargeted manner, which can result in 
incomplete assessment considering that changes can be patchy11. Thus, there is an unmet need for novel 
noninvasive strategies to assess immune dysregulation in the gastric wall. 
Activated state of macrophages is mirrored by upregulation of the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO)12-14. 
Positron emission tomography (PET) with TSPO-specific ligands has been developed over the last few years 
and provides a novel in vivo molecular technique to detect macrophage activation15. However, results obtained 
by second-generation radioligands in preclinical models have not been consistently reproduced in humans15. 
Successively more promising PET radiotracers have been developed for this application16-20. Recently, one of 
the newer agents, ER176 {4-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-(methyl-11C)-N-((1R)-1-methylpropyl)- 2-
Quinazolincarboxamide}, a third-generation TSPO-specific radioligand 
(Figure 1), has shown high affinity and excellent in vivo target-to-
background binding21, 22. Based on imaging data from several 11C-labeled 
TSPO PET ligand studies, ER176 has been identified as the most suitable 
for in vivo study of activated macrophages due to: 1) a higher specific 
binding, 2) a smaller inter-subject variability, and 3) the unique ability to 
image even a low-affinity binding state23. Delineation of activated 
macrophages with 11C-ER176 PET in the stomach of patients with DG is a 
novel application. Mayo Clinic has an FDA-approved investigational new 
drug (IND) application (#149229) for use of 11C-ER176 in a trial of 
neuroinflammation, which will be amended to include gastric imaging in DG 
and control participants proposed in this study. 
The overall goal of this project is to demonstrate feasibility of dynamic 11C-ER176 PET imaging to identify 
macrophage-driven immune dysregulation in gastric muscle of patients with DG. Non-invasive quantitative 
assessment with PET can significantly add to our diagnostic armamentarium for patients with diabetic 
gastroenteropathy. If a clear immune dysregulation is identified in a subset of patients, it can be targeted using 
immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies. Furthermore, if validated, this imaging technique can 
facilitate clinical trials aimed at targeting immune dysregulation in DG, thus offering new therapies in a disorder 
with significant unmet need. We propose the following specific aim: 
Specific Aim: To determine feasibility of dynamic 11C-ER176 PET to identify macrophage-activation in diabetic 
gastroparesis 
Hypothesis 1: Patients with diabetic gastroparesis demonstrate increased uptake for 11C-ER176 in gastric 
body and antrum compared to matched controls  
Hypothesis 2: Increased uptake of 11C-ER176 associates with a shift towards pro-inflammatory macrophage 
milieu on tissue assessment made by targeted biopsies of gastric muscle 
 
B. Background and Significance 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
 
Fig 2: Non-specificity of FDG uptake in 
stomach: Axial corrected PET (A), and fused 
axial (B) and coronal PET/CT images (C) 
demonstrate physiologic pattern of diffuse 
uptake of FDG in the stomach (white arrows). 
Gastroparesis as a complication of diabetes mellitus: Gastroparesis is a chronic disorder of the upper GI 
tract characterized by delayed gastric emptying of solids and/or liquids in the absence of mechanical 
obstruction of the gastric outlet1. Cardinal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, bloating, postprandial fullness, 
early satiety and abdominal pain. In one study, DG accounted for almost a third of the overall gastroparesis 
cases24. In the diabetes control and complications trial, delayed gastric emptying was associated with greater 
HgbA1c, longer duration of diabetes, lower R-R variability on electrocardiogram, nephropathy, retinopathy, and 
greater GI symptoms25. In a study from the type 1 diabetes exchange clinic registry, females are more likely to 
have gastroparesis than males26. Another population-based study showed a 4-fold higher prevalence of 
gastroparesis in women when compared with men27. Patients with DG have a significant impairment of their 
quality of life; especially symptoms of nausea, bloating and chronic pain28, 29. In spite of the frequent 
occurrence of this highly morbid complication of diabetes mellitus, there is a significant dearth of treatment 
options.  
Immune dysregulation in pathophysiology of diabetic gastroparesis: ICC are the pacemaker cells, which 
create the bioelectrical slow wave potential in the GI tract30. Syncytial network of ICC generate electrical slow 
waves in a spatiotemporal manner driving rhythmic contraction of smooth muscle cells31, 32. ICC are also 
involved in integrating and mediating sequential excitatory and inhibitory neuro-transmissions and in 
mechanotransduction, the critical components of normal gastrointestinal motility33. Variants in Ano-1 
transcripts, a protein specifically expressed in ICC has been associated with symptoms in DG34. Macrophage 
activity is a reflection of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory subtypes. In the Non-obese diabetic 
(NOD) mice, the development of delayed gastric emptying was associated with an increase in iNOS 
expression, a marker for macrophages with a “M1” phenotype (classically activated or pro-inflammatory).4 
Macrophage-deficient CSF1op/op mice did not develop delayed gastric emptying despite the presence of severe 
hyperglycemia.9 Administration of CSF1 resulted in replenishment of macrophages and development of 
delayed gastric emptying and ICC damage in >75% of the mice. Conditioned media from macrophages 
exposed to oxidative stress resulted in damage to cultured ICC, which could be prevented by neutralizing 
antibodies against IL6R and TNF.35 We showed that decreased CD206+ (alternatively activated, anti-
inflammatory M2 macrophages) in the gastric antrum of patients with DG correlated with the loss of ICC.36 
Additionally, patients with DG had long GT alleles in the HMOX1 gene, and these were associated with worse 
nausea symptoms.7 In our deep transcriptomic analysis of full thickness (excluding mucosa) gastric body 
biopsies, 111 genes were found to be differentially abundant in DG (log2fold difference of |≥2| with a false 
detection rate (FDR) < 5%)5. Top canonical pathways in DG included genes involved with macrophages, 
fibroblasts and endothelial cells. In a more recent study, we used the SOMAscan proteomics platform that 
quantitates expression of 1300 human proteins. We found that 73 proteins were differentially expressed in DG. 
“Role of Macrophages, Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells” was the most statistically significant altered pathway. 
Additionally, in DG, properdin expression strongly correlated with bloating scores on the Gastroparesis 
Cardinal symptom Index and expressions of prostaglandin 
G/H synthase 2, protein kinase C zeta type and complement 
C2 correlated with 4 hr gastric retention. Overall, these 
complimentary mice and human studies suggest an immune 
dysregulation driven by activated macrophages as central to 
driving injury to the ICC that are central to the physiology of 
gastric emptying.  
Lack of noninvasive tools for assessment of immune 
dysregulation in DG: There are no imaging techniques that 
can reliably assess activated macrophages in vivo. Metabolic 
imaging with the ubiquitous PET radiotracer, F18 
fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), is insufficient for this purpose 
because of its non-specificity. There can be both diffuse or 
focal uptake of FDG in the stomach either physiologically or 
due to inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. A 
representative image showing diffuse uptake of FDG in the 
stomach is shown (Figure 2). On the other hand, 11C-ER176 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
is a radiotracer with specific binding to TSPO in activated macrophages and has many favorable imaging 
properties. For instance, preliminary studies have noted physiologic organ uptake of 11C-ER176 in brain, 
thyroid, lung, heart, liver, spleen and kidneys but not in the stomach22. Finally, there have been no adverse or 
clinically detectable pharmacologic effects of 11C-ER176 in healthy subjects22. Therefore, 11C-ER176 
represents a promising PET radiotracer for delineation of activated macrophages in patients with DG.  
Innovation: This proposal is innovative from both biological and technical standpoints. Strong animal and 
human data generated by our group and others demonstrate macrophage activation in gastroparesis. This has 
been mechanistically shown to play a role in gastric motor dysfunction via injury to ICC. There is currently no 
noninvasive way to determine immune dysregulation in the gastric muscle. More broadly, macrophage 
dysfunction also plays a role in other inflammatory disorders of the gut such as inflammatory bowel disease. 
Technological advancements in ligands for PET imaging have already led to emergence of its role in studying 
neuroinflammation as well as joint inflammation. We plan to use the latest generation TSPO radioligand, 11C-
ER176, for delineating macrophage activation in DG. We will validate imaging findings with state-of-art 
sampling of gastric muscle followed by isolation of immune cells and using single cell-based techniques to 
determine transcriptional changes in immune cells. If successful, these studies will provide pilot data for larger 
studies aimed at determining immune dysregulation in diabetic gastroenteropathy as well as other 
inflammatory GI disorders.  
 
C. Preliminary Studies 
Macrophage cell population in gastric muscle expresses TSPO: In preliminary studies, human gastric 
muscle tissues (idiopathic gastroparesis) were dissociated followed by magnetic separation and isolation of 
CD45+ immune cells. Libraries were prepared using 10x Genomics Library Kits and sequenced on HiSeq4000. 
The t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot revealed 12 clusters of CD45+ cells (Figure 3a). 
CD68, a type I transmembrane glycoprotein, heavily expressed in cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage 
forming a discrete cluster (Figure 3b). TSPO showed predominant expression in the CD68+ subset of cells 
(Figure 3c). This suggests that gastric muscle contains immune cells that are TSPO+, hence, providing proof-
of-concept data that 11C-ER176 PET imaging targeting TSPO should demonstrate uptake in vivo in humans. 
TSPO has been strongly associated with an activated or pro-inflammatory macrophage subtype. In a recent 
study, during M2 (anti-inflammatory) polarization, TSPO expression was decreased14. A TSPO antagonist 
enhanced anti-inflammatory polarization. Additional studies have also demonstrated TSPO being an imaging 
target for identifying pro-inflammatory macrophage milieu12, 19. 
 
 
D. Research Design and Methods 
We plan to recruit 4 patients with DG, 4 patients with diabetes without gastroparesis, and 4 age-matched 
healthy volunteers. Considering the clear higher prevalence of DG in females compared to males, in this pilot 
and feasibility study, we will recruit only females. DG patients and diabetic patients will be recruited using the 
inclusion and exclusion criteria listed in Table 1. Healthy volunteers will be screened to have no clinical history 
of diabetes or any GI symptoms. These will be screened using a simple GI questionnaire. Additionally, they will 
Fig 3: Gastric muscular propria single cells on tSNE plots. (A) Overall immune cells (CD45+). (B) CD68+ cell subset, a 
marker for macrophage and phagocytic cell population. (C) TSPO+ cells closely overlapping with the CD68+ population 
suggesting macrophage subset of immune cells in gastric muscle express TSPO.   
(A)
(B)
(C)
CD68+
cells
TSPO+
cells

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
be screened to have no inflammatory disorders of the GI tract or use of anti-inflammatory or 
immunosuppressive therapies.  Participants will undergo a screening visit which will involve informed consent, 
history and physical 
 examination by the PI to ensure eligibility for participation in the study. Participants will also have a blood draw 
that will occur prior to the PET/CT scan. Participants will have 25 mL of blood drawn for PBMC isolation, 
proteomic, metabolomics, and genetic analysis. PBMCs will be isolated and their transcriptional and 
epigenomic profile will be studied. DG patients will complete a self-reported Patient Assessment of Upper 
Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptoms (PAGI SYM) questionnaire.  This is composed of 20 items and 6 
subscales to assess for symptoms of gastroparesis, dyspepsia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The 
severity of each symptom item over a 2-
week recall period is scored from 0 (none 
or absent) to 5 (very severe). The 
Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index 
(GCSI)37, a 9 symptom survey relevant to 
gastroparesis stratified in 3 subscales 
(nausea/vomiting, fullness/early satiety, 
and bloating) is contained within the PAGI-
SYM. We will recruit DG patients with a 
score ≥3 suggesting moderate-severe 
symptoms. In the second visit, participants 
will present NPO after midnight and 
undergo the 11C-ER176 PET/ CT scanning 
followed by upper endoscopy and 
biopsies. The imaging and endoscopy 
details are as below: 
Imaging: 11C-ER176 will be produced in 
full accordance with GMP requirements in 
the Mayo Clinic Cyclotron Facility. All PET/CT imaging will take place in the PET/CT Molecular Imaging 
Research Center on 
 of Mayo Clinic. PET/CT imaging will be performed on a state-of-the art digital 
PET/CT system (Siemens Biograph Vision 600, Siemens Healthineers). This system utilizes silicon 
photomultiplier PET detectors to attain a spatial resolution of 3.7 mm, a timing resolution of 210 picoseconds 
and a sensitivity of 16 cps/kBq over a 26-cm axial field-of-view.  
Prior to imaging, a pregnancy test will be administered to women of child-bearing potential. The subject will 
void their bladder and an intravenous (IV) line will be placed in an arm for administration of 11C-ER176. 
Participants will be given small amount of water (≤ 250 ml) immediately before the PET scan to allow gastric 
distension. The subject will be positioned supine on the imaging table with their head in a head-holder. 
Participants will be monitored visually and intermittently for adverse events during injection. 
The participants will have a low-dose, non-gated, non-contrast-enhanced, free-breathing CT from the orbits to 
upper thigh for attenuation correction (CTAC) and anatomic co-localization. Immediately following the start of 
the PET scan, 518 MBq (14 mCi) (range 370-666 MBq; 10-18 mCi) of 11C-ER 176 will be administered 
intravenously followed by a saline flush. The first 6 min of PET scanning will be a dynamic acquisition over the 
heart for measurement of the bolus phase of an input function (IF) which represents the amount of 11C-ER176 
in blood supplying tissue as a function of time. Next, 8-10 static images will be acquired sequentially by 
automatically shuttling the imaging table and scanning the patient from upper chest through abdomen, which 
will include the heart for late phase of the IF in multiple passes. A whole-body PET scan from the orbits to 
upper thigh will then be acquired at the end (60-min post injection). All PET data will be reconstructed with 
fully-3D iterative reconstruction algorithms that include corrections for attenuation (using the CTAC scan), 
scatter, randoms, dead time, decay and normalization.  
Image analyses: PET and CT images will be transferred to a dedicated workstation (MIM Software Inc., OH). 
Image analyses will be done by a board-certified nuclear radiologist. Diagnostic image quality of the late PET 
images will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Ratings of ≥3 will be considered acceptable for diagnostic use 
whereas ratings of 1-2 will be considered unacceptable. On each PET image, volumes of interest (VOIs) will be 
Table 1: Enrollment criteria for DG and Diabetic patients 
Inclusion criteria 
Exclusion criteria 
-Female 
- Ability to provide informed 
consent 
- Age 18-70 years 
- Type I or II diabetes mellitus 
- Clinical gastric emptying testing 
within 6 months of study 
enrollment (for DG patients only) 
-Gastroparesis defined by gastric 
retention of Tc-99m >20% at 4 
hrs on scintigraphy (for DG 
patients only) 
- Average Gastroparesis Cardinal 
Symptom Index (GCSI) ≥3 
suggesting moderate-severe 
symptoms (for DG patients only) 
- Women who are pregnant or 
cannot stop breast feeding for 24 
hrs 
- Using anti-coagulants, anti-
inflammatory medications (NSAIDs, 
corticosteroids, etc.) or 
immunosuppressive therapies 
within 4 weeks prior (for DG 
patients only) 
- Opioid use within last 4 weeks of 
gastric emptying scintigraphy (for 
DG patients only) 
 
- Prior gastric surgery 
- History of IBD, celiac disease, 
eosinophilic gastroenteritis, 
microscopic colitis 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
drawn around the stomach and other organs that may show radiotracer accumulation. The uptake in each VOI 
in each PET image will be measured and decay-corrected to the time of injection and normalized to the 
administered activity. The quantified VOI activity for all PET images will be converted to time-activity curves, 
and the retention of activity in each region will be used along with the IF to model the biodistribution of 11C-ER 
176. The radiopharmaceutical biodistribution will also be quantified by standard metrics [maximum & mean 
standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean respectively)]. The image quality, time-activity curves, and 
semi-quantitative metrics will be compared between diabetic gastroparesis patients and controls.  
Upper endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound and targeted biopsies of gastric muscle: A pregnancy 
test will be administered to women of child-bearing potential. Upper endoscopy will be performed only on DG 
patients only. The endoscopy will be performed within 12 weeks of the participant’s PET/CT scan, this will 
allow more scheduling flexibility for the participant and study team. During the endoscopy procedure an 
additional procedure known as endotracheal intubation may be performed to keep the airway open and assist 
with breathing. This will vary from case to case and is determined by the anesthesiologist assisting with or the 
physician performing the endoscopy. The echoendoscope (Aloka Arietta 850; Olympus, Center Valley, PA) will 
be advanced into the gastric lumen and a site targeted for EUS-guided core biopsies based on findings of the 
PET scan. Fine needle biopsy of the gastric wall will be performed using a 19 G needle (SharkCore; Medtronic, 
Minneapolis, MN) passed through the echoendoscope and across the entire gastric wall ensuring a full 
thickness (mucosa to serosa) core tissue sample. Sampling of the uninvolved region will be done to serve as 
control. In patients who do not have clear signal on PET/CT, sampling will be done from gastric antrum and 
body to ask as negative control. All endoscopic procedures will be done by advanced endoscopist 
 
). EUS-guided core biopsy is a safe procedure associated with a low risk of adverse events.  
Assessment of gastric macrophages: After tissue dissociation, using technique similar to that shown in the 
preliminary data, cells will be sorted and profiled using the Fluidigm (San Francisco, CA) Helios cytometry by 
time of flight (CyTOF) mass spectrometry system. After cleanup in FloJo to obtain singlets, data will be 
analyzed using the R-based CytofKit tool38, 39. In an approach that was not biased towards a limited subset of 
cell types, cellular subtypes will be identified and counted after labeling with a panel of 32 antibodies to 
distinguish monocytes and tissue myeloid cells from the other immune cells (CCR2, CD24, CD64, Ly6C, 
CD115/CSF1R, CD38, CD8a, Ly6G, CD11b (Mac-1), CD3e, CX3CR1,MERTK, CD11c, CD4, ESAM, PDL-1, 
CD14, CD44, F4/80, PDL-2, CD161 (NK1.1), CD45, FcER1,SiglecH, CD19, CD45R (B220), I-A/I-E, SIRPa 
(CD172a), CD206 (Mrc1), CD62L, IL2RA, CD25, TER-119). Data will be displayed as tSNE maps and 
heatmaps. 
Endpoints and statistical analysis: The biodistribution of 11C-ER 176 in the stomach using time activity 
curves and other described imaging metrics will be the primary endpoint. Correlative analysis will be done 
between biodistribution on 11C-ER176 and pro-inflammatory markers on cellular expression using CyTOF. The 
proposed study will provide means and standard deviations for larger investigation in this area. Considering the 
robust expression of TSPO in gastric macrophages in our preliminary data, we expect to see uptake of TSPO 
ligand 11C-ER 176 in the gastric muscle.  
Anticipated results, potential pitfalls and alternative strategies: We anticipate finding that patients with DG 
will have significantly higher PET uptake of 11C-ER176 compared to healthy volunteers. Additionally, we 
anticipate that the uptake will strongly associate with upregulation of TSPO and other pro-inflammatory 
markers like Ly6C and downregulation of anti-inflammatory markers like CCR2, CX3CR1 and CD206. Most 
second-generation TSPO radioligands have varying degrees of sensitivity to the single nucleotide 
polymorphism rs6971 in the TSPO gene40, and this genotype sensitivity may vary depending upon the organ 
where it is expressed22. Therefore, some subjects who are low-affinity binders are excluded from analyses and 
the remaining subjects are corrected for being either high- or mixed-affinity binders. On the other hand, 11C-
ER176, a third-generation ligand, has shown little in vitro sensitivity to rs6971. However, in vivo, 11C-ER176 
was found to be sensitive to rs6971. Nevertheless, it allowed quantitation even in low affinity binders and had 
high non-displaceable binding potential, which suggests that its relative in vivo sensitivity to rs6971 may not 
impact clinical imaging22. Due to the small sample size of this feasibility study, we will be unable to select 
subjects with varying TSPO affinity genotype. However, if we see insufficient binding, we will determine the 
genotype.  

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
Timeline: We plan to finish recruitment of 4 DG patients and 4 healthy volunteers including 11C-ER176 
PET/CT as well as endoscopic ultrasound with core biopsies within 7 months. Images will be processed in 
parallel. The next 3 months will be used for finalizing image analysis as well as CyTOF for the immune markers 
followed by manuscript submission in the last 2 months. Considering the large volume of DG patients seen at 
Mayo Clinic and strengths of the PI’s team in recruitment, we are confident we will be able to recruit. The PI’s 
laboratory is housed within the Enteric Neuroscience Program (Director,
) and the group 
has considerable experience in cellular and molecular assessment of human gastric tissue1, 5, 6, 10, 41-43. The 
nuclear medicine group at Mayo Clinic has a long-standing track record and expertise in studies of this nature 
as well as an established infrastructure to perform the dynamic PET scanning. The preliminary data, availability 
of participants, and the expertise of the investigating groups (GI, radiology) will ensure that the proposed 
studies are completed within the 1-year time frame allowing time for dissemination of results and generating 
data for a larger grant proposal.  
 
E. Literature Cited 
1. Grover M, Farrugia G, Stanghellini V. Gastroparesis: a turning point in understanding and treatment. Gut 
2019;68:2238-2250. 
2. Camilleri M, Chedid V, Ford AC, et al. Gastroparesis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2018;4:41. 
3. Choi KM, Gibbons SJ, Nguyen TV, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 protects interstitial cells of Cajal from 
oxidative stress and reverses diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2008;135:2055-64, 2064 e1-2. 
4. Choi KM, Kashyap PC, Dutta N, et al. CD206-positive M2 macrophages that express heme oxygenase-1 
protect against diabetic gastroparesis in mice. Gastroenterology 2010;138:2399-409, 2409 e1. 
5. Grover M, Gibbons SJ, Nair AA, et al. Transcriptomic signatures reveal immune dysregulation in human 
diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. BMC Med Genomics 2018;11:62. 
6. Grover M, Dasari S, Bernard CE, et al. Proteomics in gastroparesis: unique and overlapping protein 
signatures in diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 
2019;317:G716-G726. 
7. Eisenman ST, Gibbons SJ, Verhulst PJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha derived from classically 
activated "M1" macrophages reduces interstitial cell of Cajal numbers. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;29. 
8. Cipriani G, Terhaar ML, Eisenman ST, et al. Muscularis Propria Macrophages Alter the Proportion of 
Nitrergic but Not Cholinergic Gastric Myenteric Neurons. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;7:689-691 
e4. 
9. Cipriani G, Gibbons SJ, Verhulst PJ, et al. Diabetic Csf1(op/op) mice lacking macrophages are protected 
against the development of delayed gastric emptying. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;2:40-47. 
10. Grover M, Bernard CE, Pasricha PJ, et al. Diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis is associated with loss of 
CD206-positive macrophages in the gastric antrum. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;29. 
11. Malysz J, Gibbons SJ, Saravanaperumal SA, et al. Conditional genetic deletion of Ano1 in interstitial cells 
of Cajal impairs Ca(2+) transients and slow waves in adult mouse small intestine. Am J Physiol 
Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2017;312:G228-G245. 
12. Narayan N, Owen DR, Mandhair H, et al. Translocator Protein as an Imaging Marker of Macrophage and 
Stromal Activation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Pannus. J Nucl Med 2018;59:1125-1132. 
13. Albrecht DS, Ahmed SU, Kettner NW, et al. Neuroinflammation of the spinal cord and nerve roots in 
chronic radicular pain patients. Pain 2018;159:968-977. 
14. Zhou D, Ji L, Chen Y. TSPO Modulates IL-4-Induced Microglia/Macrophage M2 Polarization via PPAR-
gamma Pathway. J Mol Neurosci 2020;70:542-549. 
15. Fan Z, Calsolaro V, Atkinson RA, et al. Flutriciclamide (18F-GE180) PET: First-in-Human PET Study of 
Novel Third-Generation In Vivo Marker of Human Translocator Protein. J Nucl Med 2016;57:1753-1759. 
16. Owen DR, Yeo AJ, Gunn RN, et al. An 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) polymorphism explains 
differences in binding affinity of the PET radioligand PBR28. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012;32:1-5. 
17. Wadsworth H, Jones PA, Chau WF, et al. [(1)(8)F]GE-180: a novel fluorine-18 labelled PET tracer for 
imaging Translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO). Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2012;22:1308-13. 
18. Turkheimer FE, Rizzo G, Bloomfield PS, et al. The methodology of TSPO imaging with positron emission 
tomography. Biochem Soc Trans 2015;43:586-92. 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
19. Alam MM, Lee J, Lee SY. Recent Progress in the Development of TSPO PET Ligands for 
Neuroinflammation Imaging in Neurological Diseases. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;51:283-296. 
20. Dupont AC, Largeau B, Santiago Ribeiro MJ, et al. Translocator Protein-18 kDa (TSPO) Positron Emission 
Tomography (PET) Imaging and Its Clinical Impact in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18. 
21. Zanotti-Fregonara P, Zhang Y, Jenko KJ, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of translocator 18 kDa protein 
(TSPO) positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands with low binding sensitivity to human single 
nucleotide polymorphism rs6971. ACS Chem Neurosci 2014;5:963-71. 
22. Ikawa M, Lohith TG, Shrestha S, et al. 11C-ER176, a Radioligand for 18-kDa Translocator Protein, Has 
Adequate Sensitivity to Robustly Image All Three Affinity Genotypes in Human Brain. J Nucl Med 
2017;58:320-325. 
23. Fujita M, Kobayashi M, Ikawa M, et al. Comparison of four (11)C-labeled PET ligands to quantify 
translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) in human brain: (R)-PK11195, PBR28, DPA-713, and ER176-based on 
recent publications that measured specific-to-non-displaceable ratios. EJNMMI Res 2017;7:84. 
24. Soykan I, Sivri B, Sarosiek I, et al. Demography, clinical characteristics, psychological and abuse profiles, 
treatment, and long-term follow-up of patients with gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:2398-404. 
25. Bharucha AE, Batey-Schaefer B, Cleary PA, et al. Delayed Gastric Emptying Is Associated With Early and 
Long-term Hyperglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Gastroenterology 2015;149:330-9. 
26. Aleppo G, Calhoun P, Foster NC, et al. Reported gastroparesis in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) from 
the T1D Exchange clinic registry. J Diabetes Complications 2017;31:1669-1673. 
27. Jung HK, Choung RS, Locke GR, 3rd, et al. The incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of patients with 
gastroparesis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1996 to 2006. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1225-33. 
28. Parkman HP, Wilson LA, Hasler WL, et al. Abdominal Pain in Patients with Gastroparesis: Associations 
with Gastroparesis Symptoms, Etiology of Gastroparesis, Gastric Emptying, Somatization, and Quality of 
Life. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64:2242-2255. 
29. Yu D, Ramsey FV, Norton WF, et al. The Burdens, Concerns, and Quality of Life of Patients with 
Gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62:879-893. 
30. Hennig GW, Spencer NJ, Jokela-Willis S, et al. ICC-MY coordinate smooth muscle electrical and 
mechanical activity in the murine small intestine. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010;22:e138-51. 
31. Ordog T, Ward SM, Sanders KM. Interstitial cells of cajal generate electrical slow waves in the murine 
stomach. J Physiol 1999;518:257-69. 
32. Smith TK, Reed JB, Sanders KM. Interaction of two electrical pacemakers in muscularis of canine proximal 
colon. Am J Physiol 1987;252:C290-9. 
33. Klein S, Seidler B, Kettenberger A, et al. Interstitial cells of Cajal integrate excitatory and inhibitory 
neurotransmission with intestinal slow-wave activity. Nat Commun 2013;4:1630. 
34. Mazzone A, Bernard CE, Strege PR, et al. Altered expression of Ano1 variants in human diabetic 
gastroparesis. J Biol Chem 2011;286:13393-403. 
35. Cipriani G, Gibbons SJ, Miller KE, et al. Change in populations of macrophages promotes development of 
delayed gastric emptying in mice. Gastroenterology 2018;154:2122-2136 e12. 
36. Grover M, Bernard CE, Pasricha PJ, et al. Diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis is associated with loss of 
CD206-positive macrophages in the gastric antrum. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;29:doi: 
10.1111/nmo.13018. 
37. Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Dubois D, et al. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): development and 
validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms. Qual Life Res 
2004;13:833-44. 
38. Chen H, Lau MC, Wong MT, et al. Cytofkit: A Bioconductor Package for an Integrated Mass Cytometry 
Data Analysis Pipeline. PLoS Comput Biol 2016;12:e1005112. 
39. Wong MT, Chen J, Narayanan S, et al. Mapping the Diversity of Follicular Helper T Cells in Human Blood 
and Tonsils Using High-Dimensional Mass Cytometry Analysis. Cell Rep 2015;11:1822-33. 
40. Kreisl WC, Jenko KJ, Hines CS, et al. A genetic polymorphism for translocator protein 18 kDa affects both 
in vitro and in vivo radioligand binding in human brain to this putative biomarker of neuroinflammation. J 
Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013;33:53-8. 
41. Grover M, Farrugia G, Lurken MS, et al. Cellular changes in diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. 
Gastroenterology 2011;140:1575-85 e8. 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
42. Grover M, Bernard CE, Pasricha PJ, et al. Clinical-histological associations in gastroparesis: results from 
the Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;24:531-9, e249. 
43. Faussone-Pellegrini MS, Grover M, Pasricha PJ, et al. Ultrastructural differences between diabetic and 
idiopathic gastroparesis. J Cell Mol Med 2012;16:1573-81. 
 
F. Protection of Human Subjects 
1. Risks to the Subjects 
a. Human subject involvement and characteristics 
Patients with diabetic gastroparesis (n=4) , diabetic patiens, and age-and BMI-matched healthy volunteers 
(n=4) will be recruited for the study (all female) using following criteria.   
Participants: 
Inclusion criteria: 
1) Age: 18 to 70 years of age 
2) Ability to provide informed consent 
3) Type I or II diabetes mellitus 
4) Gastroparesis defined by gastric retention of Tc-99m >60 % at 2 hrs and/or >10% at 4 hrs on scintigraphy 
(for DG patients only) 
5) Average Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) ≥3 indicating moderate-severe symptoms (for DG 
patients only) 
 
Exclusion criteria: 
1) Women who are pregnant or cannot stop breast feeding for 24 hrs 
2) Using anti-coagulants, anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, etc.) or 
immunosuppressive therapies within the 4 weeks prior (for DG patients only) 
3) Opioid use within the last 4 weeks of gastric emptying scintigraphy 
4) 4. Prior gastric surgery 
5) 5. History of IBD, celiac disease, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, microscopic colitis 
 
Dietary, fluid and other restrictions: 
During recruitment, informed consent review, and visits, the subjects were informed and reminded of the 
following restrictions: 
1. No alcohol for 72 hours before 1st visit and until after end of study period 
2. Use of tobacco products (last 3 months) 
 
Sites where research will be performed 
Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota 
 
b. Sources of research materials 
Research material will be the 11C ER 176 PET/CT images, upper endoscopy with gastric muscle biopsies and 
cells derived from the biopsies. Additionally, questionnaire responses and medical records will be research 
materials. Results will be maintained in the research laboratories that are ultimately the sole responsibility of 
the PI, and will be accessed by a secure password available only to authorized study personnel. Data will be 
merged for studies of associations by the biostatistician. All of the information collected in this study will be for 
research purposes only. 
 
c. Potential risks 
The potential risks associated with the study are those associated with completing questionnaires, 11C ER 176 
PET/CT scan and EUS with biopsies. EUS-guided core biopsy is a safe procedure associated with a low risk of 
adverse events. Mild self-limiting serosal bruising and/or localized hematoma formation at the sites of EUS 
biopsies were reported in a small cohort of patients with gastroparesis who underwent EUS-guided FNA biopsy 
of the gastric muscle. Questionnaires come with a risk of privacy erosion and emotional distress. However, the 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
questionnaires proposed in the study are extensively validated and well received. Participants will have the 
option of leaving any question unanswered that makes them uncomfortable.  
 
2. Adequacy of Protection against Risks 
a. Recruitment and informed consent  
All participants will provide written informed consent using IRB-approved consent forms. The consent form 
becomes a permanent part of the medical record at Mayo Clinic. All subjects will be given a verbal explanation 
of the study, provided time to read and understand the written consent form, given opportunities to ask 
questions and provided a copy of the consent form. Participants will be informed of their right to withdraw from 
the study at any time without prejudice to their clinical management at Mayo Clinic then or in the future. 
Consent will be sought by the PI or the assigned study coordinator, and consent will be documented by the 
participant’s signature on the consent form. Specific information is provided in the Mayo consent form 
regarding storage and future use of the samples. The participants will be informed that any genetic information 
collected is not yet pertinent to clinical practice, the information will not be included in the medical record, but 
will be maintained in a coded fashion accessible only to study personnel. The consent form includes specific 
details about sharing sequencing data on public databases in a coded fashion at the time of publication. All 
recruitment material will be approved by the IRB at Mayo Clinic. 
 
b. Protection against risk 
Responsible conduct of human research by study personnel 
The personnel involved in the study have completed the required education on the protection of human 
research participants. This is done through IRB’s website “Protecting Human Research Participants” online 
training program. At the conclusion of the instruction, individuals are required to complete a quiz for 
competency assessment. In addition, Dr. Grover has completed CCaTS Core 6001 (Refresher in Responsible 
Conduct of Research) and Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) training on Good Clinical Practice 
Course for Clinical Trials Involving Drugs. He is also up-to-date on the CITI instruction in human subjects 
protection. The course is designed to help users understand human subjects protection issues through a web-
based program.  
 
Specific risks and precautions  
1) Survey questionnaires: Questionnaires pose no more than minimal risk to the participants. There is a 
potential for perception of privacy intrusion. However, the subjects have the right to refuse to answer any of 
the questions or stop at any time, and there is no penalty for refusing to participate. No complications have 
been recorded. The proposed questionnaires are validated, widely used, and were received well by the 
participants.   
2) 11C ER 176 PET/CT scan: PET scans and the tracers used are generally safe. In a recent study, no 
adverse or clinically detectable pharmacologic effects were observed with 11C-ER176 for any of the 17 
subjects  
3) EUS-guided core biopsy: Mild self-limiting serosal bruising and/or localized hematoma formation at the 
sites of EUS biopsies. Other standard risks of an upper endoscopy include pain (abdominal and throat), 
aspiration and extremely rarely, death. Serious risk of bleeding and frank perforation is rare (<1 in 1000).  
 
3. Potential Benefits of the Proposed Research to the Subjects and Others 
The proposed research has the potential to remarkably enhance our understanding of visualizing immune 
dysregulation in the gastric muscle of patients with diabetic gastroparesis.  This will have a downstream effect 
of identifying immune dysfunction in other GI conditions. Broadly, this can revolutionize assessment of 
inflammatory milieu in areas that are not easily or safely amenable for a biopsy. As of now, there likely will not 
be a direct benefit to the gastroparesis patients as we still do not have clear therapies to target immune 
dysfunction in gastroparesis. Given the anticipated mechanistic insights to the participants in this research 
proposal, and to others with diabetic gut dysfunction, the benefits outweigh the risks.  
 
4. Importance of the Knowledge to be Gained 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
The proposed research has the potential to develop a new approach to diagnose immune dysregulation in 
diabetic gastroparesis, a disorder with unmet clinical need. Specifically, this project is aiming to determine if a 
special radio ligand 11C ER 176 based PET/CT imaging can detect activated macrophages in the gastric 
muscle of patients with diabetic gastroparesis. Additionally, these results will be validated using actual 
assessment of gastric muscle tissue to determine cellular markers that associate with pro- or anti-inflammatory 
macrophages. This study will open a novel paradigm for assessment of immune dysregulation in the GI tract 
which will have utility for a broad range of GI conditions. This pilot and feasibility proposal will generate novel 
preliminary evidence for future investigations in this area and treatment trials. The risks to the participants are 
fairly low with questionnaires, PET/CT scan and EUS with biopsies which are safe procedures. Given the 
repertoire of the PI and study team in conducting mechanistic, endoscopic and imaging studies of this nature 
as well as the precautions taken to minimize discomfort or adverse effects, the overall risk of this study is fairly 
low. There is a high likelihood (e.g., investigator team’s record and expertise, validated methods) of obtaining 
meaningful, useful information for the proposed aim. 
 
5. Data and Safety Plan 
Subject Safety: Adverse Events 
Adverse Event Grading 
Attribution scale: An adverse event is defined as either an expected side effect that is of a serious nature, or an 
unexpected side effect regardless of severity. All events will be graded as to their attribution (unrelated to 
protocol: possibly, probably, or definitely related to protocol). Any event that is reported to either the PI or his 
designated research associates by the subject or medical staff caring for the subject and which meets the 
criteria will be documented as such. 
Expected risks: These risks will be addressed in the protocol and consent form. The expected risks include: 
o Loss of confidentiality through unauthorized release of private medical information. This is unlikely 
since all data are collected in electronic form and access is protected by user identification ID.  
o Questionnaires pose some risk of causing emotional distress but these are validated and widely used 
questionnaires which are typically well received.  
o 
11C ER 176 based PET/CT imaging is generally safe and no adverse effects were noted in published 
studies. However, there is radiation exposure which can be harmful. Additionally, there could be 
intolerance to the IV injection of radio ligand. 
o EUS with core gastric biopsies are generally low risk, especially with an advanced endoscopist like Dr. 
Rajan who will perform this procedure on all proposed participants. Adverse effects include abdominal 
pain, bleeding, and perforation. Rarely, these adverse events can lead to sepsis and death. However, 
the probability of a serious adverse event is 1 in 2000 or less, making the procedure quite safe.   
 
Plan for Reporting both Anticipated and Unanticipated Adverse Events.  
Any adverse event that is reported generates a report, which will be submitted to the Mayo Clinic IRB. The 
report will include a description of the event, when and how it was reported, as well as any official chart records 
or documentation to corroborate the event or the reporting of the event. All adverse events will be graded as 
mild, moderate, or severe. Any severe and/or unanticipated adverse event will be reported within 24 hours to 
the IRB. All other adverse events will be reported in a timely fashion to the IRB, preferably within 2 weeks. All 
adverse events will be summarized annually and submitted to the IRB.  
Subject Safety: Safety review plan and monitoring 
Safety Reviews: The PI will review the safety and progress of this study on a quarterly basis.  
Annual Review: The PI will review this protocol on a continuing basis for participant safety and include results 
of the review in the annual progress reports submitted to the IRB. The annual report will address: (1) whether 
adverse event rates are consistent with pre-study assumptions; (2) reason for dropouts from the study; (3) 
whether all participants met entry criteria; (4) whether continuation of the study is justified on the basis that 
additional data are needed to accomplish the stated aims of the study; and (5) conditions whereby the study 
might be terminated prematurely. 

Protocol Version 2.0 
 
10/4/2021 
OMB No. 0925-0001/0002 (Rev. 03/16 Approved Through 10/31/2018) 
Page       
Continuation Format Page 
Data Integrity  
Adherence Statement: The DSMP outlined will adhere to the protocol approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB (IRB-C 
which handles research conducted in the Mayo Clinic CCaTS). 
Subject Privacy: Data are kept in strict confidence. The template consent form required by Mayo Clinic’s IRB 
includes appropriate language addressing the risks and confidentiality protection. Confidentiality is assured by 
the use of study number identifiers assigned to each participant. All data will be identified with the use of the 
study number identifier to the participant. Participants are assured protection of confidentiality as specified by 
the HIPAA language contained within the standardized template. 
Data Confidentiality. 
Database protection: The Mayo Clinic software programs are secured with password protection. All information 
kept within Excel spreadsheets use a study number identifier. Any electronic communication with collaborators 
outside the Mayo Clinic would include data identified by study number only. The only people with access to the 
spreadsheet are the study coordinator and the study statistician. The remaining investigators only review group 
data that have been summarized by the biostatistician. 
Secure storage of biospecimens: Tissue samples collected are submitted to a designated laboratory 
technologist after anonymizing with a study number that is unrelated to the patient’s Mayo Clinic registration 
number. Thus, the technologist does not have access to clinical information. The database that includes 
sample numbers and Mayo Clinic numbers is maintained in an Excel spreadsheet by the study coordinator. 
 
G. Sharing Plan 
We will share materials and manage intellectual property as described in the NIH Sharing Policies and Related 
Guidance on NIH-Funded Research Resources including the NIH Public Access Plan for Increasing Access to 
Scientific Publications and Digital Scientific Data from NIH Funded Scientific Research (February, 2015) and 
the NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (August, 2014).  
Following publication, we will share our results, methodology, and reagents with the research community at 
large in a manner consistent with data/resource sharing policies of the National Institute of Health, the Mayo 
Clinic and the publishers of the journals where our reports will appear. Should any intellectual property arise 
which requires a patent, we will ensure that the technology (materials and data) remain widely available to the 
research community according to the NIH Principles and Guidelines document.  
As a means of sharing knowledge, publication of NIH-supported original research in primary scientific journals 
will be our priority. The PI will concentrate on publishing these findings in a timely manner and acknowledge 
that the research is supported by the NIH. Upon acceptance, publications will be submitted to the NIH 
Manuscript Submission (NIHMS) system for open access via PubMed Central.