A Phase IV Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Single-center Study of the Safety and Effects on Cardiac Structure and Function of Hydralazine and Isosorbide Dinitrate in Patients With Hemodialysis Dependent ESRD
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Chronic Hemodialysis (ESRD)
Sponsor: Brigham and Women's Hospital

ClinicaTtrials.gov Record ID-NCT02228408 
Page i 
 
Safety and Cardiovascular Efficacy of Hydralazine and Isosorbide 
Dinitrate in Dialysis-Dependent ESRD (HIDE) Study 
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center pilot 
study of the safety and effects on cardiac structure and function of 
hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate in patients with hemodialysis 
dependent ESRD  
Funding Sponsor: 
National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases 
National Institutes of Health 
2 Democracy Plaza 
6707 Democracy Boulevard 
Bethesda, MD  20892-5458 
 
Study Products: 
Isosorbide dinitrate (ISD) and 
Hydralazine (HY) 
 
Protocol Number: 
2014P001544/BWH 
Brigham & Women’s Initial 
version dated: 
 
[8.04.2014] 
Version: 
Version 1.0, February 13, 2017 
 
Version 1.1, June 20, 2017 
 
Version 1.2, September 7, 2017 
Version 1.3, April 13, 2018 
 
 
 
 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page ii 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
 
 
Table of Contents 
 
STUDY SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................3 
1 
INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................4 
1.1 
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 4 
1.2 
INVESTIGATIONAL AGENTS ................................................................................................................. 6 
1.3 
CLINICAL DATA TO DATE.................................................................................................................... 8 
1.4 
DOSE RATIONALE AND RISKS .............................................................................................................. 8 
1.4.1 
Benefits .................................................................................................................................... 9 
2 
STUDY OBJECTIVES .....................................................................................................................9 
2.1 
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 9 
2.2 
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. 10 
3 
STUDY DESIGN ......................................................................................................................... 10 
3.1 
GENERAL DESIGN ........................................................................................................................... 10 
3.2 
STUDY ENDPOINTS ......................................................................................................................... 11 
3.2.1 
Safety Endpoints .................................................................................................................... 11 
3.2.2 
Tolerability Endpoints ............................................................................................................ 12 
3.2.3 
Efficacy Endpoints ................................................................................................................. 12 
3.2.4 
Feasibility Endpoints .............................................................................................................. 14 
4 
PARTICIPANT SELECTION AND WITHDRAWAL ........................................................................... 14 
4.1 
INCLUSION CRITERIA ....................................................................................................................... 14 
4.2 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA....................................................................................................................... 14 
4.3 
PARTICIPANT RECRUITMENT AND SCREENING ..................................................................................... 15 
4.4 
EARLY WITHDRAWAL OF PARTICIPANTS ............................................................................................. 15 
4.4.1 
When and How to Withdraw Participants ............................................................................ 15 
4.4.2 
Data Collection and Follow-up for Withdrawn Participants ................................................. 16 
5 
STUDY DRUG ........................................................................................................................... 16 
5.1 
DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 16 
5.2 
TREATMENT REGIMEN .................................................................................................................... 16 
5.3 
PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF STUDY DRUG AND MAINTENANCE OF BLIND ............................... 18 
5.4 
PARTICIPANT ADHERENCE MONITORING ............................................................................................ 19 
5.5 
PRIOR AND CONCOMITANT THERAPY ................................................................................................. 19 
5.6 
PACKAGING ................................................................................................................................... 19 
5.7 
BLINDING OF STUDY DRUG .............................................................................................................. 19 
5.8 
RECEIVING, STORAGE, DISPENSING AND RETURN................................................................................. 19 
5.8.1 
Receipt of Drug Supplies ........................................................................................................ 19 
5.8.2 
Storage .................................................................................................................................. 20 
5.8.3 
Dispensing of Study Drug ...................................................................................................... 20 
5.8.4 
Return or Destruction of Study Drug ..................................................................................... 20 
6 
STUDY PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................ 20 
6.1 
PRE-SCREENING VISIT ..................................................................................................................... 20 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page iii 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
6.2 
SCREENING VISIT ............................................................................................................................ 20 
6.3 
BASELINE VISIT/RANDOMIZATION VISIT ............................................................................................. 21 
6.4 
WEEK 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 VISITS......................................................................................... 21 
6.5 
WEEK 26 VISIT .............................................................................................................................. 22 
6.6 
WEEK 30 VISIT .............................................................................................................................. 22 
6.7 
HYPOTENSION PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................ 22 
6.8 
HEADACHE OR GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS ................................................................................... 23 
6.9 
IMAGING STUDIES .......................................................................................................................... 23 
6.9.1 
Echocardiography .................................................................................................................. 23 
6.9.2 
PET Scan ................................................................................................................................ 23 
7 
STATISTICAL PLAN .................................................................................................................... 24 
7.1 
SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION ......................................................................................................... 24 
7.2 
RANDOMIZATION AND STRATIFICATION ............................................................................................. 25 
7.3 
INTENT-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS AND MISSING DATA ................................................................................ 25 
7.4 
STATISTICAL METHODS ................................................................................................................... 26 
7.4.1 
Descriptive Analysis ............................................................................................................... 27 
7.4.2 
Secondary Analyses ............................................................................................................... 27 
7.4.3 
Interim Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 28 
8 
SAFETY AND ADVERSE EVENTS ................................................................................................. 28 
8.1 
DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................. 28 
8.1.1 
Adverse Event ........................................................................................................................ 28 
8.1.2 
Serious Adverse Event ........................................................................................................... 28 
8.1.3 
Unanticipated Problem Involving Risk to Participants or Others .......................................... 28 
8.1.4 
Pre-Existing Condition ........................................................................................................... 29 
8.2 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING PERIOD ................................................................................................. 29 
8.2.1 
Post-study Adverse Events .................................................................................................... 29 
8.3 
RECORDING OF ADVERSE EVENTS ...................................................................................................... 29 
8.3.1 
Anticipated Adverse Events ................................................................................................... 29 
8.3.2 
Non-Reportable Events .......................................................................................................... 30 
8.4 
REPORTING OF SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS ............................................ 31 
8.4.1 
Investigator Reporting to the IRB .......................................................................................... 31 
8.4.2 
DCC Notification to Study Investigator .................................................................................. 32 
8.5 
MEDICAL MONITORING .................................................................................................................. 32 
8.5.1 
Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) ..................................................... 33 
9 
DATA MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................... 33 
9.1.1 
Quality Control Activities ....................................................................................................... 33 
9.1.2 
Routine reports ...................................................................................................................... 34 
9.2 
DATA SECURITY ............................................................................................................................. 34 
9.2.1 
Confidentiality ....................................................................................................................... 34 
9.3 
SOURCE DOCUMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 35 
9.3.1 
Maintaining Anonymity of Submitted Medical Records ....................................................... 35 
9.3.2 
Data Sharing .......................................................................................................................... 35 
9.3.3 
Records Retention ................................................................................................................. 35 
10 
STUDY MONITORING, AUDITING, AND INSPECTING .................................................................. 35 
10.1 
STUDY MONITORING PLAN .............................................................................................................. 35 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page iv 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
10.2 
AUDITING AND INSPECTING .............................................................................................................. 35 
11 
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................................... 36 
12 
STUDY FINANCES ..................................................................................................................... 36 
12.1 
FUNDING SOURCE .......................................................................................................................... 36 
12.2 
CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................................... 36 
12.3 
PARTICIPANT STIPEND ..................................................................................................................... 36 
13 
PUBLICATION PLAN .................................................................................................................. 37 
14 
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 38 
15 
VISIT & PROCEDURE SCHEDULE ................................................................................................ 46 
 
 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page i 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
List of Abbreviations 
ACE 
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor 
ADMA 
asymmetric dimethyl arginine 
AE 
adverse event 
ALDO 
aldosterone 
ANCOVA 
analysis of covariance 
ANG 
angiopoietin II 
ARB 
angiotensin receptor blocker 
BID 
twice daily 
CFR 
coronary flow reserve 
CKD 
chronic kidney disease 
CM 
centimeter 
CRF 
case report form 
CRP 
C-reactive protein 
CVD 
cardiovascular disease 
CVR 
coronary vascular resistance 
DCC 
data coordinating center 
DSMB 
data safety and monitoring board 
END 
endostatin 
ESRD 
end stage renal disease 
FTP 
file transfer protocol 
GFR 
glomerular filtration rate 
HD 
hemodialysis 
Hg 
mercury 
HY 
hydralazine 
HIPAA 
health insurance portability and accounting act 
IDS 
investigational drug service 
IEC 
independent ethics committee 
IRB 
institutional review board 
ITT 
intention to treat 
ISD 
isosorbide dinitrate 
L 
liter 
LVEF 
left ventricular ejection fraction 
LVMI 
left ventricular mass index 
mEq 
milliequivalent 
MM 
millimeter 
MG 
milligram 
MOP 
manual of procedures 
MRI 
magnetic resonance imaging 
MI 
myocardial infarction  
NIDDK 
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 
NO 
nitric oxide 
NOS 
nitric oxide synthase 
OHRP 
Office of Human Research Protections 
PET 
positron emission tomography 
PHI 
protected health information 
PICP 
procollagen type I carboxy-terminal peptide 
PTH 
parathyroid hormone 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page ii 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
QD 
daily 
RCT 
randomized controlled trial 
SAE 
serious adverse event 
SAP 
statistical analysis plan 
SBP 
systolic blood pressure 
TDI 
tissue Doppler index  
TSP 
thrombospondin II 
UAE 
unanticipated adverse event 
VEGF 
vascular endothelial growth factor

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 3 
Version 1.1 20170620 
 
Study Summary 
Title 
Safety and Cardiovascular Efficacy of Hydralazine and Isosorbide Dinitrate in 
Dialysis-Dependent ESRD  
Short Title 
HIDE Study 
Protocol Number 
2014P001544/BWH 
Phase 
Pilot 
Methodology 
Randomized, double-blind, 2-arm  
Study Duration 
2 years 
Study Center(s) 
Brigham and Women’s Hospital 
Objectives 
• To generate pilot data on the safety and tolerability of hydralazine (HY) 
isosorbide dinitrate (ISD) combination therapy in patients with dialysis-
dependent ESRD.   
• To generate pilot estimates of the effect of HY/ISD combination therapy 
compared with placebo on cardiovascular efficacy parameters in patients 
with dialysis-dependent ESRD.  
Number of 
Participants 
16 
Diagnosis and Main 
Inclusion Criteria 
Dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease  
Study Product, Dose, 
Route, Regimen 
ISD/HY 10 mg/10 mg, 3X/day for 1 week, orally 
ISD/HY 20 mg/35 mg, 3X/day for 1 week, orally 
ISD/HY 40 mg/75 mg, 3X/day for 2 weeks, orally 
Duration of 
administration 
26 weeks 
Major Outcomes 
• 
Safety:  hypotension, intra-dialytic cramping 
• 
Tolerability:  treatment adherence 
• 
Efficacy:  a) change in mitral annular E' velocity; b) change in CFR 
• 
Feasibility:  recruitment rate, retention, dosing completeness 
Statistical 
Methodology 
Mixed effects linear regression models will be used to assess the direction 
and time averaged magnitude of change in E’ and CFR efficacy parameters, 
with and without controlling for baseline covariates, to compare the effects 
of therapy.   
 
The incidence of safety events, especially hypotension, in treatment and 
placebo groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. 
 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 4 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
1 Introduction 
This document is a protocol for a human research study. This study is to be conducted according to US 
and international standards of Good Clinical Practice (FDA Title 21 part 312 and International 
Conference on Harmonization guidelines), applicable government regulations and the research policies 
and procedures in effect at the institutions where the study is implemented.   
1.1 
Background 
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects >13% of the U.S. population1 and is an important risk factor for 
cardiovascular disease (CVD)2and CV mortality2-7.  The associations between CKD and CVD are not fully-
explained by traditional risk factors8-11, and for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), standard 
CV therapies have not reduced mortality12-15. Given the growing CKD population16, the absence of 
effective therapies represents a critical public health challenge, and better understanding of the 
underlying mechanisms and identification of effective treatments for CVD in ESRD are needed. Sudden 
cardiac death is the major cause of CV death in ESRD with only 5.3% of sudden cardiac death due to 
myocardial infarction (MI) compared with 26.1% from arrhythmias17. A high risk of sudden cardiac death 
is detectable early in CKD5, and the risk increases dramatically in advanced CKD. For example, in one 
study sudden cardiac death incidence was 6-fold higher in dialysis patients compared with individuals 
without CKD18. The disproportionate risk of sudden cardiac death relative to MI suggests that plaque 
rupture and subsequent MI are unlikely to fully explain the high incidence of sudden cardiac death and 
that myocardial remodeling in ESRD lowers the threshold for arrhythmia generation and increases the 
risk of CV death independently of coronary plaque rupture. Targeting these myocardial processes could 
provide a powerful approach for improving CV outcomes in the setting of advanced CKD. The HIDE trial 
is designed to provide pilot data on the efficacy and safety of a novel, ESRD-targeted therapeutic 
approach to reducing CV morbidity.  
Interstitial Fibrosis and Microvascular Rarefaction—Uremia inhibits ischemia-driven angiogenesis19, and 
experimental CKD is characterized by myocardial microvascular loss, reduced tolerability of ischemia, 
increased infarct size after coronary ligation, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), increased interstitial 
collagen, and severe myocardial fibrosis19-25. Increased fibrosis and decreased myocardial capillary 
number have also been observed in a few small studies of ESRD patients26. Myocardial coronary flow 
reserve—a measure of microvascular supply and function—also declines in CKD27-30, and coronary 
collateral vessels are 41% less abundant in individuals with mild-moderate CKD31. LV mass, diastolic 
function and late gadolinium enhancement (a marker of myocardial scar) also increase dramatically and 
predict an increased risk of death32-39. In combination, LVH, increased interstitial collagen, and 
microvascular rarefaction increase capillary to cardiomyocyte distances22, 26, impair myocardial oxygen 
delivery, and cause chronic cardiomyocyte hypo-perfusion which reduces ischemia tolerance, increases 
myocyte necrosis after minor decrements in coronary flow, and disrupts myocardial electrical circuits 
(already impacted by increased interstitial scarring). This likely lowers thresholds for propagation of fatal 
arrhythmias, and underlies the high incidence of sudden cardiac death in ESRD5, 40.  
 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 5 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
Nitric Oxide (NO)—NO concentrations decrease in CKD41-45. This likely results from a rise in asymmetric 
di-methyl arginine (ADMA)46-49, a potent inhibitor of NO-synthase (NOS) which lowers NO bioavailability 
and is associated with atherosclerosis, LVH, and high risks of CV mortality in advanced CKD46-52, and with 
endothelial dysfunction, LVH, diastolic dysfunction and mortality in ESRD49, 51, 53-55. The effect of NO on 
ESRD- and CKD-associated CV mortality is likely mediated through its role in the progression of 
myocardial fibrosis and microvascular rarefaction since ADMA and NO deficiency induce expression of 
TGF-β56, 57 (a potent cytokine that stimulates fibrosis58) and endothelial to mesenchymal transformation  
which results in microvascular dropout and fibrosis59-61.  Chronic NOS inhibition has been shown in 
animal models to cause  microvascular rarefaction, endothelial to mesenchymal transformation, and 
increased collagen synthesis62-64, and in the heart, over-expression of ADMA and  LNAME (a potent NOS 
inhibitor) or knock out of endothelial NOS produces dramatic increases in perivascular fibrosis65, LVH, 
myocardial fibrosis and capillary rarefaction66-70 71. Conversely, NOS up-regulation improves myocardial 
vascular supply72, 73. Taken together, these findings support a hypothesis that ADMA and reduced NO 
bioavailability in ESRD are key contributors to myocardial fibrosis and capillary rarefaction. 
Isordil (ISD) and Hydralazine (HY)—The administration of ISD, a long-acting nitrate, increases NO 
synthesis and NO release74-78 through its direct conversion into NO by mitochondrial aldehyde 
dehydrogenase 79, 80.  Long-acting nitrates increase blood NO81, and in experimental models can reduce 
myocardial fibrosis82, 83 and improve post-MI remodeling84. Therapeutic efficacy in humans was 
demonstrated in the AHEFT trial in which combined ISD/HY reduced mortality, hospitalizations and LVH 
in 1050 African American patients with congestive heart failure85, 86. These effects were modified by NOS 
genotype87 suggesting that effects were mediated through changes in NO bioavailability. Unfortunately, 
the efficacy of nitrate therapy is limited by the  development of nitrate tolerance which is mediated by 
counter-regulatory, vaso-constrictive hormones and by NO-induced production of superoxide with 
deactivation of aldehyde dehydrogenase, and  interruption of calcium signaling pathways 80, 88, 89.  HY, a 
direct vasodilator, counteracts these neuro-humoral changes and inhibits superoxide and peroxynitrate 
production thereby preventing inactivation of aldehyde dehydrogenase and the decoupling of NO and 
superoxide synthesis by NOS23, 90-93.  Clinical studies demonstrating the ability of combination ISD-HY 
therapy to improve nitrate tolerance provided a primary motivation for the AHEFT trial94, 95, and suggest 
that combined ISD-HY is likely to maximize NO bioavailability compared with mono-ISD therapy in ESRD.  
Additionally, HY may provide some independent benefits.  In experimental myocardial infarction, right 
ventricular accumulation of collagen is reduced by HY therapy96.  HY also reduces LV stiffness and 
improves collagen solubility in the spontaneously hypertensive rat97, and it antagonizes angiotensin 
induced myocardial fibrosis98.  Lastly, HY prevents hypertensive arteriolar remodeling, and it induces 
VEGF synthesis and angiogenesis99-101. Thus, HY may have benefits in ESRD independent of its impact on 
ISD tolerance.  
Safety—ISD and HY have been widely used for decades in ESRD, but there are only limited research 
reports.  Safety of ISD is suggested by the lack of a significant renal or dialytic clearance102-104 and by the 
tolerability of a similar agent, isosorbide mono-nitrate in one report105. The kidney has a limited role in 
HY metabolism106, and side effects were infrequent and transient in one report of 18 dialysis patients107.  
However, combination ISD/HY therapy has not been studied in ESRD; hence the need for pilot studies. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 6 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
Conclusions—ESRD is characterized by a vicious cycle in which ADMA reduces NO bioavailability leading 
to myocardial fibrosis and capillary loss while increasing synthesis of angiogenesis inhibitors that 
potentiate the effects of decreased NO and further lower its availability. These effects of ADMA provide 
a compelling rationale for pilot testing of an NO-donating strategy with proven efficacy in other settings, 
as a targeted therapy to reduce CV events in ESRD. 
1.2 
Investigational Agents 
Isosorbide Dinitrate  
Isosorbide dinitrate (ISD) is described chemically as 1,4:3,6-dianhydro-d-glucitol-2,5-dinitrate 9 and its 
structural formula is shown in Figure 1. 
 
Figure 1 
ISD is a white to off-white, crystalline powder with the empirical formula C6H8N2O8 and a molecular 
weight of 236.14. It is freely soluble in organic solvents such as alcohol, chloroform and ether, but is only 
sparingly soluble in water. 
ISD is a vasodilator affecting both arteries and veins. Its dilator properties result from the release of 
nitric oxide and the subsequent activation of guanylyl cyclase, and ultimate relaxation of vascular 
smooth muscle. 
Absorption and Distribution 
Absorption of ISD from tablets after oral dosing is nearly complete. The average bioavailability of ISD is 
about 25%, but is highly variable (10%-90%) due to first-pass metabolism and increases progressively 
during chronic therapy. Serum concentrations reach their maximum about one hour after ingestion. The 
volume of distribution of ISD is 2 to 4 L/kg. About 28% of circulating ISD is protein bound.  Under steady-
state conditions, ISD accumulates significantly in muscle (pectoral) and vein (saphenous) wall relative to 
simultaneous plasma concentrations. 
Metabolism and Elimination 
ISD undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver and is cleared at a rate of 2 to 4 L/minute with 
a serum half- life of about 1 hour. The clearance of ISD is primarily by de-nitration to the 2-mononitrate 
(15 to 25%) and the 5-mononitrate (75 to 85%). Both metabolites have biological activity, especially the 
5-mononitrate which has an overall half- life of about 5 hours. The 5-mononitrate is cleared by de-
nitration to isosorbide, glucuronidation to the 5-mononitrate glucuronides, and by de-

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 7 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
nitration/hydration to sorbitol. The 2-mononitrate appears to participate in the same metabolic 
pathways with a half- life of about 2 hours. Most ISD is eliminated by the kidneys as conjugated 
metabolites. 
Hydralazine 
Hydralazine hydrochloride (HY) is described chemically as 1-hydrazinophthalazine 
monohydrochloride and its structural formula are shown in Figure 2.  
 
 
Figure 2 
HY is a white to off-white, crystalline powder with the empirical formula C8H8N4·HCl and a molecular 
weight of 196.64. It is soluble in water, slightly soluble in alcohol, and very slightly soluble in ether. 
Absorption and Distribution 
About 2/3rd of a 50-mg dose of 14C-hydralazine HCl given in gelatin capsules was absorbed in 
hypertensive participants. In patients with heart failure, mean absolute bioavailability of a single oral 
dose of HY 75 mg varies from 10 to 26%, with the higher percentages in slow acetylators (See 
Metabolism and Elimination). 
Administration of doses escalating from 75 mg to 1000 mg thrice daily to patients with congestive heart 
failure resulted in an up to 9-fold increase in the dose normalized AUC, indicating nonlinear kinetics of 
HY, probably reflecting saturable first pass metabolism. After intravenous administration of hydralazine 
in a dose of 0.3 mg/kg, the steady-state volume of distribution in patients with congestive heart failure 
was 2.2 L/kg. 
Metabolism and Elimination 
Metabolism is the main route for the elimination of hydralazine. Negligible amounts of unchanged 
hydralazine are excreted in urine.  Hydralazine is metabolized by acetylation, ring oxidation and 
conjugation with endogenous compounds including pyruvic acid. Acetylation occurs predominantly 
during the first pass after oral administration which explains the dependence of the absolute 
bioavailability on the acetylator phenotype. About 50% of patients are fast acetylators and have lower 
exposure. After oral administration of hydralazine, the major circulating metabolites are hydralazine 
pyruvate hydrazone and methyltriazolophthalazine. Hydralazine is the main pharmacologically active 
entity; hydralazine pyruvate hydrazone has only minimal hypotensive and tachycardic activity. The 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 8 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
pharmacological activity of methyltriazolophthalazine has not been determined. The major identified 
metabolite of hydralazine excreted in urine is acetylhydrazinophthalazinone. 
Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions 
Administration of hydralazine can increase the exposure to a number of drugs including beta blockers.  
1.3 
Clinical Data to Date 
Heart Failure: The AHEFT trial was a multi-center trial that enrolled 1050 African American patients with 
NYHA class 3 or 4 heart failure to ISD/HY 120/225 mg/day in 3 divided doses or placebo. There was a 
significant reduction in mortality (10.2 vs.  6.2%, P=0.02) with active therapy and a 33% reduction in rate 
of hospitalization for heart failure, P<0.00185. 
ESRD: ISD and HY have been widely used for decades in ESRD, but there are only limited research 
reports. Safety of ISD is suggested by the lack of a significant renal or dialytic clearance102-104 and 
because a similar agent, isosorbide mono-nitrate, was well tolerated in one report105. In addition, renal 
function has a limited role in HY metabolism106, and side effects were infrequent and transient in one 
report of 18 dialysis patients107. However, combination therapy has not been studied in ESRD 
highlighting the need for pilot studies. 
1.4 
Dose Rationale and Risks 
As noted above (section 1.3), despite the clinical use of the investigational agents individually or in 
combination in patients with ESRD, ISD/HY combination therapy has not been previously tested in a 
clinical trial of patients on chronic hemodialysis.  Given the absence of dialysis-specific data and the pilot 
nature of this trial, the starting and target doses were selected on the basis of the doses used in the 
AHEFT trial85 in which combination therapy was associated with significant survival benefits (1.3).  
Allowances have been made to allow for scheduled dose reductions to the minimum clinical dose of 
ISD/HY in the event of intolerance.  The proposed doses of ISD are equivalent to the doses of isosorbide 
mono-nitrate that were well tolerated in a 6 month trial of 144 chronic hemodialysis patients105.   
HY is routinely used for clinical purposes in chronic dialysis patients.  Although, there is minimal clinical 
trial data on its use in this setting, HY was well tolerated in a single clinical trial enrolling 18 maintenance 
dialysis patients107. 
Potential Risks  
Both ISD and HY may cause gastrointestinal symptoms, allergic reactions, or decreased blood pressure 
which could result in light-headedness or symptomatic hypotension, particularly during dialysis. In 
addition, both ISD and HY (similar to most vasoactive agents) can cause severe hypotension or syncope 
when given to patients with cardiac outflow obstruction. ISD cannot be given in combination with 
phosphodiesterase inhibitors used for treatment of erectile dysfunction due to significant hypotensive 
effects of the combination.  Finally, HY can rarely cause a drug associated lupus-like syndrome or 
peripheral neuropathy when used for prolonged periods.  Each of these potential adverse reactions is 
important, but they should be interpreted within the context of the widespread clinical use of both 
agents in dialysis patients for many years.   

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 9 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
No specific metabolic or hematologic complications of therapy are anticipated.  However, to provide an 
additional margin of safety, participant dialysis laboratory studies will be monitored throughout the trial 
by coordinating with the outpatient dialysis units and by reviewing labs drawn according to standard 
clinical schedules. 
1.4.1 
Benefits 
Benefits of ISD/HY therapy in the dialysis population remain unproven at this time. Hypothesized 
benefits of therapy include improved blood pressure control, improvement in cardiovascular function 
and structure, and a decrease in arrhythmias.  
2 Study Objectives 
The primary objective of this study is to characterize the safety, tolerability, and cardiovascular impact of 
combination ISD/HY therapy compared with placebo in maintenance hemodialysis patients, and to 
assess the feasibility of larger trials.  The primary efficacy parameters are the change in E' on tissue 
Doppler echocardiography (TDI) as an index of diastolic function and a surrogate for myocardial fibrosis, 
and the change in coronary flow reserve (CFR) on myocardial PET imaging as an index of microvascular 
supply and function.  These parameters are designed to broaden insight into the potential effects of 
therapy on cardiac structure and function in individuals with dialysis-dependent ESRD and to assess the 
feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial. 
2.1 
Primary Objectives 
Safety 
• 
To evaluate the safety of ISD/HY therapy in individuals with ESRD on HD. 
o Safety events include the following:  
 
Serious hypotension is defined as hypotension requiring hospitalization or 
treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute 
myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection) 
 
Inter-dialytic hypotension  
 
Intra-dialytic hypotension and symptoms of hypotension (e.g., muscle cramping) 
 
Treatment-emergent events defined as the combined incidence of death, 
myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalizations, , and serious hypotension 
(hypotension requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not 
attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular 
event) 
 
The individual components of the treatment-emergent endpoint 
 
Cardiovascular death 
 
Gastrointestinal events or headache requiring dose adjustment or discontinuation 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 10 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
Tolerability 
• 
To evaluate the tolerability of assigned therapy in individuals with ESRD on maintenance 
hemodialysis. Tolerability events will include reduction in dose of study medication during the 
course of the treatment period or discontinuation of study drug.  
Efficacy 
• 
To test the hypothesis that ISD/HY combination therapy improves diastolic function in individuals 
with ESRD on HD compared with placebo.  The change in E’ on TDI echocardiography of the left 
ventricle from baseline to end of study will be used in the primary endpoint assessment of 
diastolic function. 
• 
To test the hypothesis that ISD/HY combination therapy improves microvascular function in 
individuals with ESRD on HD compared with placebo.  The change in CFR on myocardial PET from 
baseline to end of study will be used for the primary endpoint assessment of diastolic function. 
Feasibility  
• 
To assess feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial. 
o Feasibility will be assessed based on recruitment rate and dropout rates. 
2.2 
Secondary Objectives 
Secondary objectives are designed to expand understanding of cardiovascular structure and function 
and their association with ISD/HY therapy in ESRD by analysis of the following parameters:  
• 
Change between baseline and 26 weeks in markers of fibrosis and circulating inhibitors of 
angiogenesis including procollagen type I carboxy terminal peptide (PICP), asymmetric 
dimethylarginine (ADMA), endostatin (END), angiopoietin II (ANG) and thrombospondin II (TSP) 
• 
Change between baseline and 26 weeks in left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Change between 
baseline and 26 weeks in ejection fraction. Change between baseline and 26 weeks in myocardial 
strain and strain rate  
• 
Change between baseline and 26 weeks in stress and resting myocardial blood flow 
• 
Association between baseline CFR and E’ 
• 
Association between change in CFR and change in E’ 
• 
Association between baseline ADMA, ANG, END, TSP or PICP and baseline CFR or E’ 
3 Study Design 
3.1 
General Design 
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled 2-arm trial that will compare placebo with ISD/HY combination 
therapy.  Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to ISD/HY or placebo. As shown in Figure 4, the 
study will be conducted in 2 phases: a 4-week dose escalation phase and a 22-week treatment phase.   
All randomized participants will initiate treatment with therapy three times daily. The active therapy 
group will receive a one-week supply of ISD/HY 10/10 followed by a one-week supply of ISD/HY 20/35 
3x/day. The placebo control group will receive an identical supply of placebo and will follow the same 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 11 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
schedule as the active therapy group.   At the 1 week and the 2 week visits, tolerability and hypotension 
will be assessed.  If the starting dose and first dose titration is tolerated, participants will be increased to 
ISD/HY 40/75 mg 3x/day (active therapy) or placebo and they will receive an additional 2 weeks drug 
supply.  Tolerability will be re-evaluated after an additional 2 weeks and at 4 week intervals thereafter.  
At 4 weeks, participants tolerating the full dose will receive a 12-week supply of study medication at the 
appropriate dose. At 16 weeks, an additional 10-week supply will be provided.  Participants not 
tolerating the full dose at this point may reduce to the starting doses of active therapy at this visit.  In 
the event of poor tolerance or drug related adverse events (e.g. hypotension, intra-dialytic cramping), 
the dose of study medication may be held or reduced to a minimum dose of ISD/HY 10/10 mg 3x/day 
(active therapy) or matched placebo 3x/day. Except where un-blinding is necessary for safety purposes, 
participants not tolerating the lowest dose of active therapy will be reduced to double placebo therapy  
in order to maintain unbiased assessments of study endpoints. 
In order to maintain the blind, all study participants, regardless of randomized assignment, will receive 
new dosing kits within 1 day (with a window of up to 3 days) of the 1, 2, 4, and 16 week visits, and will 
be evaluated bi-weekly during the dose escalation phase.   
 
 
3.2 
Study Endpoints 
3.2.1 
Safety Endpoints 
The safety endpoints are: 
1) Adverse events 
2) Adverse events that preclude further treatment with the study agent 
3) Serious hypotension defined as hypotension requiring hospitalization or treatment in an 
emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other 
cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection 
4) Recurrent intra-dialytic hypotension is defined as systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg during ≥3 
dialysis sessions per rolling 30-day period or treatment for either hypotension or symptoms of 
hypotension if systolic blood pressure is <100 mm Hg during ≥3 dialysis sessions per rolling 30-
day period.  Treatment includes saline infusion, lowering of the ultrafiltration rate or other 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 12 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
interventions directed at hypotension such as vasopressor agents.  Symptoms include but are 
not limited to muscle cramping, lightheadedness, and nausea. 
5) Inter-dialytic hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or hypotension 
requiring adjustment in blood pressure medications or treatment in an emergency or 
hospitalized setting. 
6) Mean pre-dialysis blood pressure 
7) Mean lowest intra-dialytic blood pressure 
8) Cardiovascular hospitalization 
9) Stroke 
10) Death 
3.2.2 
Tolerability Endpoints 
Tolerability will be assessed on the basis of whether participants can continue the assigned dose 
throughout the entire treatment period.  Failure of overall tolerability will be defined by discontinuation 
or reduction in dose of study medication.  Tolerability events will be sub-classified according to whether 
discontinuation is due to gastrointestinal symptoms or headache. 
3.2.3 
Efficacy Endpoints 
The primary efficacy parameters will be measured between baseline and 26 weeks:  
1) Change in mitral annular E' velocity will be measured using Tissue Doppler Index (TDI) 
echocardiography of the left ventricle as a measure of diastolic function and as surrogate 
measure of left ventricular fibrosis. 
2) Change in coronary flow reserve (CFR) will be measured using 13NH3 myocardial PET scanning as 
a surrogate measure of microvascular structure and function.  CFR will be calculated as the ratio 
of absolute myocardial blood flow at stress over rest for the entire left ventricle.  In the case of 
flow defects the primary measure of CFR used will be the CFR over flow defect-free portion of 
the LV.  
 
Preliminary estimates of the impact of ISD/HY on microvascular function can only be evaluated via PET 
scanning, and will provide a critical metric necessary for understanding the potential of ISD/HY to impact 
cardiovascular health.  Results of PET scanning are thus expected, to provide direct insights into the 
underlying scientific hypotheses and potential for therapeutic efficacy that serve as a critical 
complement to the assessment of LV mass and function by echocardiography. 
 
E’ has been chosen to be the primary echocardiographic endpoint because the intra-observer coefficient 
of variation is low113 and multiple studies demonstrate a high correlation with myocardial fibrosis114-116--
a primary biologic endpoint of interest. E’, for example, parallels the accumulation of myocardial 
collagen and fibrosis in the senescence prone mouse117,  and correlates with endomyocardial fibrosis 
after human cardiac transplant118 as well as the presence of late gadolinium enhancement119—a highly-
validated measure of myocardial scar—across multiple disease states.  These and other data 
demonstrating the strong correlation of TDI with tissue fibrosis across different disease states and 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 13 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
multiple species, strongly establish TDI as a non-invasive marker of myocardial fibrosis well-suited for 
repeated measure studies.    Furthermore, abnormalities in TDI have been strongly linked to mortality in 
multiple disease states120-122 demonstrating that TDI is a clinically relevant measure.  In addition, ESRD-
specific studies show that E’ is highly correlated with LV mass and other indices of diastolic function, and 
that changes in E’ predict mortality39, 123.  
In contrast to other echocardiographic measures, E’ (or the ratio of E/E’) is minimally affected by 
intravascular volume status124-126—a critical consideration in ESRD where volume status can vary widely. 
The adjunctive information on diastolic and systolic function and filling pressures generated by 
echocardiography provide additional advantages to the use of TDI while the measurement of SR and 
strain may allow detection of subtle changes in myocardial function due to fibrotic processes127.  Finally, 
these measures are known to respond to therapeutic interventions that exert anti-fibrotic effects128.  
Alternative approaches for assessing fibrosis include myocardial biopsy which is considered the gold 
standard, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium.  However, both of these have risks 
of serious complications and thus are not suitable for a research study.  
CFR has been chosen as the co-primary efficacy endpoint because it is the best available tool for 
evaluation of microvascular supply and function in the study population. The correlation coefficient for 
CFR among 4 readers in the proposed study lab was 0.94 indicating excellent reproducibility. In the 
absence of critical coronary stenosis, hyperemic MBF is determined primarily by capillary density and 
diameter since capillaries cannot vasodilate in response to adenosine. CFR thus primarily measures 
microvascular supply, rather than coronary atherosclerosis129-131, and it correlates well with human 
myocardial microvascular histology132, 133. It is strongly associated with mortality134, and values are low in 
CKD and predict a poor prognosis135.  PET CFR is thus non-invasive, reproducible, well-correlated with 
myocardial histology, and predictive of outcomes.  The gold standard, myocardial biopsy, would be 
prohibitively risky in this population.  Thus, CFR is the best non-invasive endpoint available for 
assessment of the cardiac microvasculature. 
Secondary efficacy endpoints are: 
1) Change between baseline and 26 weeks in markers of fibrosis and circulating inhibitors of 
angiogenesis including procollagen type I carboxy terminal peptide (PICP), asymmetric 
dimethylarginine (ADMA), endostatin (END), angiopoietin II (ANG) and thrombospondin II (TSP) 
2) Change between baseline and 26 weeks in left ventricular mass index (LVMI).  Change between 
baseline and 26 weeks in ejection fraction.  Change between baseline and 26 weeks in 
myocardial strain and strain rate.  
3) Change between baseline and 26 weeks in stress and resting myocardial blood flow 
4) Association between baseline CFR and E’ 
5) Association between change in CFR and change in E’ 
6) Association between baseline ADMA, ANG, END, TSP or PICP and baseline CFR or E’ 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 14 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
3.2.4 
Feasibility Endpoints 
An objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a large-scale trial powered for clinical 
outcomes.  Feasibility will be assessed based on rates of recruitment, withdrawal, and loss-to-follow-up, 
reasons for ineligibility, and adherence to the study drug administration schedule. 
4 Participant Selection and Withdrawal 
4.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
a) Maintenance hemodialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease 
b) Age 18-85 years 
c) ≥90 days since dialysis initiation 
d) Ability to provide informed consent 
e) All pre-dialysis seated systolic blood pressure measurements must be ≥120 mm Hg in the 2 
weeks before the screening visit and systolic bp must be ≥120 mm Hg on the day of 
randomization. 
4.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
a) Serum potassium ≥6.5 mEq/L within 2 months prior to screening 
b) Unscheduled dialysis for hyperkalemia within the 3 months prior to screening 
c) Pre-dialysis hypotension defined as pre-dialysis SBP <100 mm Hg (seated measurement) within  
4 weeks prior to the screening visit 
d) Recurrent intra-dialytic hypotension defined as either of the following:  
o systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg during ≥3 dialysis sessions in the 30 days prior to the 
screening visit, or  
o treatment for hypotension or symptoms of hypotension during ≥3 dialysis sessions in 
the 30 days prior to the screening visit.  For this criterion, hypotension is defined as 
systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg. 
e) Mitral valve repair or replacement 
f) Severe mitral valve disease by echocardiography, coronary angiography or cardiac magnetic 
resonance imaging 
g) Anticipated kidney transplant, change to peritoneal dialysis, or transfer to another dialysis unit 
within 6 months 
h) Expected survival <6 months 
i) 
Allergy to study medications (ISD, HY,  adenosine or dipyridamole) 
j) 
Active use of sildenafil, vardenafil or tadalafil  
k) Current severe aortic stenosis or other cause of LV outflow obstruction 
l) 
Pregnancy, anticipated pregnancy, or breastfeeding, confirmed by serum pregnancy test on the 
day of PET scan 
m) Incarceration 
n) Participation in another intervention study 
o) Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors  
p) Contraindication to adenosine including  

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 15 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
o 2nd or 3rd degree heart block, sick sinus syndrome or symptomatic bradycardia (without 
a functioning pacemaker) 
o moderate or severe asthma  
o chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 
q) Active use of any of the study medications unless participant and physician willing to 
discontinue prior to enrollment. 
4.3 
Participant Recruitment and Screening 
Participants at dialysis units affiliated with investigator and co-investigator practices will be pre-
screened for eligibility.  In addition to active screening of dialysis unit rosters by study personnel, 
informational handouts and brochures may be disseminated at affiliated dialysis units in order to allow 
for interested participants to learn about the study and to contact the study investigator if interested.  
All study material must be approved by local IRBs before dissemination to potential study participants.   
Dialysis unit labs, medical records at the investigator’s institution, and treatment or history records at 
local dialysis units will be reviewed to assess eligibility for enrollment.  No study-specific testing is 
required to confirm eligibility, except a serum pregnancy test (to assess eligibility on the day of PET scan) 
for women of childbearing potential, and serum potassium if a measurement is not available through 
clinical measurements within the specified time window.  Prior to enrollment, each participant’s treating 
nephrologist will be contacted to assess suitability for enrollment. If a participant is not eligible at the 
initial screening visit, he/she may be rescreened one additional time, after the appropriate interval has 
passed.  
Once preliminary eligibility is confirmed, informed consent will be obtained by a qualified investigator or 
study site designee during an in-person visit.  This visit may take place either at the local dialysis unit or 
at the investigator’s institution, according to investigator and participant preferences.  A 
randomization/baseline visit will be scheduled within 4 weeks of the screening visit. 
4.4 
Early Withdrawal of Participants 
4.4.1 
When and How to Withdraw Participants 
Early withdrawals will be discouraged and participants who are not willing to continue the intervention 
will be encouraged to remain in the study and continue study evaluations.  However, participants may 
be withdrawn from the study under the following circumstances that have the potential to compromise 
patient autonomy or safety:   
a) Pregnancy 
b) Withdrawal of consent 
c) Allergy to or documented intolerance of study medications (e.g. recurrent hypotension on the 
lowest dose of study medications) 
d) Non-compliance with dialysis schedule compromising ability to follow serum potassium on a 
monthly basis 
e) Organ transplantation 
f) Change to a different dialysis modality 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 16 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
g) Initiation of sildenafil, vardenafil or tadalafil therapy 
h) Transfer to non-participating dialysis unit 
4.4.2 
Data Collection and Follow-up for Withdrawn Participants 
In the case of withdrawal, every attempt will be made to obtain consent to continue to follow patients 
for the occurrence of mortality, hospitalizations, and other safety signals via telephone or in-person 
contact with participants, relatives, and dialysis unit staff and records.  As a last resort, the social 
security death index will be queried for mortality events on individuals otherwise lost to follow-up.   
Participants will be deemed as lost to follow-up after ≥ 3 attempts have been made to contact the 
patient via their preferred means of contact (telephone or email), ≥1 attempt has been made to contact 
the patient via their secondary means of contact, and ≥1 attempt to contact next of kin is unanswered.  
For withdrawn participants not withdrawing consent, attempts will be made to obtain endpoint TDI 
echocardiograms and PET CFR according to the original study in order to preserve the intention to treat 
analysis.  PET scans will not be obtained in the event of withdrawal/termination due to pregnancy. 
5 Study Drug  
5.1 
Description 
Study drugs will be administered as matched, gel-coated capsules containing ISD (10, 20 or 40 mg), HY 
(10, 35, or 75 mg), or placebo (methylcellulose powder).  
5.2 
Treatment Regimen   
As depicted in Figure 4, 16 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either placebo 3x daily or 
ISD/HY 10 mg/10 mg, 3x daily for 1 week. Doses scheduled to be administered within 2 hours prior to a 
dialysis session will be held and administered post-dialysis on dialysis days.  Participants will be 
contacted by phone or in person to review tolerability and adverse events at 1 week after drug initiation 
and will be examined in person at 2 weeks.  Dialysis records will be reviewed for hypotension at each 
visit.  The sequence will be repeated following the scheduled dose titration which will occur following 
the 2-week visit.  Adjustment to dosage of concomitant medications, the dialysis prescription, or the 
study drug on the basis of hypotension will occur as described in Section 6.7.   
All randomized participants will receive an initial one-week supply of study medication following the 
baseline visit, and a one-week supply after the Week 1 visit.  Those assigned to ISD/HY will begin 
treatment at 10/10 mg 3X daily. Participants randomized to placebo will follow the identical schedule. 
Participants will be contacted at 1 week to check for the occurrence of adverse events and dose-limiting 
symptoms, and those tolerating the study drug will have the dose increased to ISD/HY 20/35 mg 3X daily 
or placebo.  At Week 2 participants will be examined in-person at their dialysis units.  Adverse events 
will be reviewed and dialysis run sheets will be examined for the occurrence of inter- or intra-dialytic 
hypotension at each visit.  In the absence of dose-limiting hypotension or other adverse events, the dose 
of ISD/HY will be increased to 40/75 mg 3X/daily following the Week 2 visit.   

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 17 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
During the 4-week dose escalation phase, a study drug request form will be entered into the data 
management system at 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks to request the next supply of study drug.  Unless 
there is a contraindication to a dose increase (e.g. hypotension), the investigator will indicate approval 
for dose escalation on the request form.  The Data Management System will generate a unique kit 
number based on the randomized treatment assignment and the prior dose.  If up-titration to the next 
dose is contraindicated, the Clinical Center investigator will indicate this on the study drug request form 
and a kit number corresponding to the current dose of will be generated.   
If down-titration of the study drug dose is required during the dose escalation phase or during the 
treatment phase, the Clinical Center investigator will request a dose reduction on the study drug 
request form.  In this case, a supply of blinded study medication using the next lower dose of ISD/HY 
or placebo will be provided.  In the event that a participant is already receiving the lowest dose, study 
medication will be discontinued. In the event that a 3rd down titration of dose is required study 
medications will also be discontinued. Un-blinding to preserve patient safety will be considered via a 
formal request to the DCC.   
If the dose escalation schedule is interrupted (e.g., if a participant is hospitalized at the scheduled 
time of dose escalation and did not take study drug during the hospitalization), dose escalation will be 
delayed until the participant has had access to the current dose of study drug for the specified 
interval (1 week for the first dose level, 2 weeks for the second dose interval).  If, due to a 
considerable delay in dose escalation, a participant has not reached the final dose assignment by their 
Week 8 visit, the participant will remain at the current dose of study drug for the remainder of the 
study and the treatment phase will be shortened accordingly such that the total duration of study 
participation is not increased as a result of the delay. For example, if dose escalation is not completed 
until week 10, the treatment phase will be 16 weeks rather than 22 weeks.    
 
Participants will be contacted by phone or in person at Weeks 1 and 3 (plus or minus 3-5 days) as 
described above and will be examined in-person at Weeks 2 and 4. Dialysis records will be reviewed at 
each time point.  Following the Week 4 visit a 12-week supply of the maximal tolerated dose of study 
medication will be distributed to participants who will be evaluated in-person at the dialysis unit every 4 
weeks for the duration of the study. A 10-week supply of study medication will be distributed to 
participants following the Week 16 visit.  At Week 26, participants will have a close-out visit, 
echocardiography and PET scan at the medical center and will then discontinue study medications. 
In the event of dose-limiting symptoms such as headache, hypotension or gastrointestinal distress, dose 
increases will be deferred until symptoms have resolved and there has been adjustment to concomitant 
therapies, diet or dialysis prescription as described in Section 6.7, the dose of study medication or 
matched placebo may be reduced as applicable.  During both the dose escalation phase and the 
treatment phase, the dose may be reduced to the next lower dose level in the event of adverse events 
as described in Section 6.7.  In order to maintain the blind, all participants will receive blinded 
medication supplies according to the specified dose within 3 days of the Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4 
visits, and within 1 week of the Week 16 week visit, regardless of whether the dose is changed. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 18 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
 
 
 
Method for Assigning Participants to Treatment Groups 
The randomization schedule will be stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at ≤45% vs >45% 
to ensure balance across treatment arms of patients with preserved versus reduced LVEF. A clinical 
echocardiogram will be used for LVEF determination if available within 6 months. If no echocardiogram 
is available within the required timeframe then a study cardiologist will perform a limited reading on the 
study echocardiogram done during the baseline visit. There may be a delay of up to 72 hours between 
the baseline visit and randomization to allow for the completion of this limited reading.  
Randomly permuted blocks of random sizes will be used to control the balance of participants assigned 
to each treatment regimen within each stratum.  This method guarantees that at no time during 
randomization will the number of participants in any arm be grossly imbalanced, and ensures that the 
investigator will be unable to predict assignments.  All randomization schedules will remain confidential, 
and known only to authorized members of the central pharmacy. 
All relevant screening and eligibility confirmation data must be entered into the data management 
system in advance of randomization, in order for an eligible participant to be randomized.  When the 
study team agrees that all eligibility criteria have been met, the patient will be randomized according to 
the pre-prepared, stratum specific randomization schedule.   This randomization process will provide a 
randomized treatment assignment for that participant within the relevant stratum, linked with a specific 
drug kit/box prepared at the study pharmacy.  The kit will then be provided to the investigative team for 
distribution at the randomization/baseline visit. 
5.3 
Preparation and Administration of Study Drug and Maintenance of Blind 
Study drug and matching controls will be prepared by the Investigational Drug Service (IDS).  The IDS will 
distribute study drug kits, containing a 1-week supply at baseline and Week 1, a 2-week supply at Week 
2, a 12-week supply at Week 4, and a 10-week supply at Week 16.  Drug supplies will be packaged to 
contain a 3-day or 5-day supply of extra medication depending on the visit interval.   
All doses of ISD, HY, and placebo will be manufactured to have identical appearances using gelatin 
encapsulation or equivalent methods. IDS personnel responsible for preparation of study drug will not 
have access to study data or results and will not participate in analyses of study data or publications.  
However, appropriate IDS personnel will have access to the randomization scheme and code in order to 
prepare study drug kits containing the correct dose of active medication or placebo for each group and 
study participant. 
During the dose titration phase, IDS personnel will prepare kits containing a 10-day supply of the 
specified dose of ISD/HY or matched placebo for each group at baseline and Week 1.  These packages 
will be replaced with kits containing a 2-week + 5 day supply of the next dose of study drug or placebo 
following the Week 2 visit, a 12-week + 5 day supply following the Week 4 visit, and a 10-week + 5 day 
supply following the Week 16 visit. If up-titration to the next dose is not indicated (e.g. due to 
hypotension or gastrointestinal symptoms), the investigator will notify the IDS, and a package containing 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 19 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
the last dose of ISD/HY or placebo will be substituted.  If at any time, the participant experiences dose-
limiting symptoms requiring down-titration of study drug, the IDS will be notified to prepare a new 
supply of study drug at the next lowest dose for the appropriate number of days remaining until the 
next scheduled drug distribution.  The participants will be instructed to discontinue study medication 
until they receive the new package. 
The investigator will notify the IDS when down-titration of dose is required for a particular participant.  
In this case, the IDS will prepare a supply of blinded study medication using the next lower dose.  In the 
event that a participant is already receiving the lowest dose, placebo will be substituted.  As only 3 dose-
level of medications are specified, study medications will be discontinued in the event that a down 
titration below the lowest dose of study medications is required.  Un-blinding to preserve patient safety 
will be allowed after formal documentation of the need by the investigator and a formal request to 
the IDS.  
5.4 
Participant Adherence Monitoring 
Empty pill containers will be returned to site investigator at the conclusion of each 2-week period during 
the dose escalation phase, and at 16 weeks and the end of the study during the treatment phase.  Pill 
counts will be performed to assess participant adherence with prescribed study medications.   
5.5 
Prior and Concomitant Therapy 
Baseline medication use (both oral and intravenous) and history of prior coronary revascularization 
procedures will be collected at baseline.  A participant’s standard of care medication may be changed 
prior to study participation if considered clinically appropriate.  No changes in drug dose or medications 
will be made without the approval of the prescribing physician.  Concomitant medical therapies and 
coronary revascularizations will be collected throughout the course of the study. Use of sildenafil, 
vardenfil or tadalafil is listed as an exclusion criterion.  Participants requiring the initiation of therapy 
with these agents during the study will have study medications withdrawn, but will continue to be 
followed for adverse events and efficacy assessments.  No other concomitant therapies are prohibited.  
5.6 
Packaging 
Study drug will be distributed in participant-specific containers.  Labeling will include patient ID, protocol 
number, study-center, expiration date, instructions, and “prescribing” physician (study investigator).   
5.7 
Blinding of Study Drug 
Generic ISD, HY will be purchased, and matching placebos will be prepared by the IDS.  The identity of 
matched placebos will be concealed from both investigator and participants.  Only the IDS will remain 
unblinded.  See Section 8.4 for further information on un-blinding procedures, if needed. 
5.8 
Receiving, Storage, Dispensing and Return 
5.8.1 
Receipt of Drug Supplies 
The IDS pharmacist will distribute study agent to the participant during their study visits. Alternatively, 
investigator may deliver drug supply to the patients during the study visits.   

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 20 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
General Study Product Accountability, Patient Specific Study Product Accountability, and if necessary, 
Shipment Tracking Accountability Logs will be created by the IDS staff and study product use 
documented on respective logs.  Documentation includes study product receipt, storage, dispensing, 
and final disposition.  Study product must be inventoried at least once per month within 30 days of the 
count for the previous month. 
5.8.2 
Storage 
ISD, HY, and matched placebo should be stored at <25ºC.  Study supplies will be stored in the IDS 
pharmacy until the date of distribution to study participants. 
5.8.3 
Dispensing of Study Drug 
The pharmacist or trained site designee will dispense study drug to the patient and complete a 
dispensing/accountability log for each participant.  Documentation of training will be held in the site’s 
regulatory binder.   
5.8.4 
Return or Destruction of Study Drug 
Medication containers will be returned by patients at the end of each 2-week or 90-day period and 
remaining pills counted to assess adherence.  Unused supplies of study drug will be destroyed by study 
staff once the pill count is completed and documented.  
6 Study Procedures 
Study procedures and testing are provided in the visit schedule in Section 15. Medical history 
(hypertension, coronary artery disease, coronary revascularization, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, 
cerebral or peripheral vascular disease, peptic ulcer disease, cancer, smoking, arrhythmia, cause of 
ESRD, dialysis vintage, prior transplant), baseline medications, dialysis unit labs (chemistries, PTH, 
complete blood count), vital signs, and dialysis prescription will be collected at baseline. 
6.1 
Pre-screening Visit 
Dialysis unit records and study center medical records will be reviewed to assess eligibility.  The treating 
nephrologist for potentially eligible patients will be contacted to further assess eligibility and obtain 
permission to contact the patient.  Patients remaining eligible after this assessment will be approached 
in person at the dialysis unit to confirm eligibility for and interest in participation.  Participants signing 
IRB-approved informational flyers which expressly provide consent to be called, may be screened by 
telephone.  Participants will be provided with a copy of study brochures and the consent form to review 
at their leisure, and they will be provided with study staff contact information so that they can reach the 
investigator or a designee with additional questions about the study.   
6.2 
Screening Visit 
Eligible participants expressing interest in participation will be scheduled for a screening visit.  This visit 
may take place at the local dialysis unit or at the study center.  Informed consent will be obtained and 
documented, eligibility criteria will be confirmed, and the baseline visit will be scheduled during this 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 21 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
visit.  Demographic data (age, sex, race), vital signs, edema assessment, medication use, dialysis labs, 
and medical history will be obtained following informed consent.   
6.3 
Baseline Visit/Randomization Visit 
The baseline visit will be scheduled within 4 weeks of the screening visit. A physical examination will be 
conducted. Data on medication use, baseline medical conditions, vital signs and edema assessment will 
be collected.  Dialysis prescription, dialysis labs, medications, and vital signs will be updated within 3 
days prior to the baseline visit.  Serum and plasma will be collected, aliquoted and frozen at -80°C.  
Additional blood will be drawn for testing of baseline chemistries and blood counts as well as local lab 
serum pregnancy testing (in pre-menopausal women).  Baseline TDI echo and PET scans will be 
performed.  The echo and PET scans are not required to occur on the same day, however, they both 
should be completed prior to randomization and drug distribution.  If LVEF stratification needs to be 
determined from the baseline echo, then there may be up to a 72-hour delay between the baseline visit 
and randomization in order to allow for a limited reading of the study TDI echo.  A clinical 
echocardiogram will be used for LVEF determination if available within 6 months of the baseline visit 
date.  Once all the baseline activities have been completed, the patient will be randomized and a 1-week 
+ 3 day supply of study medication will be dispensed.  The baseline/randomization visit can be 
scheduled over two dates within a 10-day window. 
6.4 
Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 Visits  
Participants will be contacted by telephone or in-person at the dialysis unit 1 week after the start of 
study medications for the occurrence of adverse events (hypotension, headache, gastrointestinal 
symptoms, and hospitalizations).  Those participants tolerating study medication will have the dose 
increased to ISD/HY 20/35 mg or placebo for the next week.  Dialysis treatment records will be reviewed 
for the occurrence of hypotension and standard of care dialysis labs will be reviewed at each visit. The 
dose of study drug may be reduced if a participant experiences dose-limiting adverse events, as outlined 
below.  
Participants will be interviewed in-person at the dialysis unit at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 16 for the 
occurrence of adverse events (intra-dialytic hypotension, headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, and 
hospitalizations). Dialysis treatment records will be reviewed for the occurrence of hypotension and 
standard of care dialysis labs will be reviewed.  Vital signs and edema will be assessed. In the absence of 
dose-limiting symptoms, the dose of study medications will be increased following the Week 2 visit. The 
dose of study drug may be reduced if a participant experiences dose-limiting adverse events, as outlined 
below.  Following each visit, the appropriate dose of study drug will be delivered to study participants. 
At that time, pill containers will be returned and unused pills counted and destroyed.  Participants will 
be contacted at Week 3 to collect adverse event information.  
Following the Week 4 visit, participants will be contacted in-person or by telephone every 4 weeks at 
their dialysis facilities.  Adverse events and tolerability will be reviewed. Dialysis treatment records will 
be analyzed for the occurrence of hypotension and standard of care dialysis labs will be reviewed.  Pill 
containers will be returned and unused pills counted and destroyed after the Week 16 visit. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 22 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
The IDS will be notified to proceed with refill of study medication for patients continuing in the study 
following the Week 1, 2, 4, and 16 visits.   
Visit windows will be ± 3 days for the week 1, 2 and 4 visits and ± 7 days for week 8-30 visits. 
6.5 
Week 26 Visit 
At the Week 26 (end of treatment) visit, participants will be interviewed in person to review the 
occurrence of adverse events. Dialysis unit records will be reviewed as above.  Pill containers will be 
returned and unused pills counted.  Vital signs and edema will be assessed. Blood will be drawn for long-
term storage, for central lab testing of chemistries and blood counts, and for local lab serum pregnancy 
tests (in pre-menopausal women).  End of study TDI echo will be performed as will PET scans.  If 
necessary, this visit can be split into 2 visits to promote scheduling of end of study testing.  
6.6 
Week 30 Visit 
At Week 30, participants will be called or visited at the dialysis unit to determine whether participants 
are having any adverse effects from the study medications.  Dialysis treatment records will be reviewed 
for the occurrence of hypotension and dialysis unit records will be reviewed. 
6.7 
Hypotension Procedures 
In the event of recurrent intra-dialytic hypotension or serious hypotension not attributable to acute 
events (e.g. acute myocardial infarction, sepsis), the investigator will review the participant’s non-study 
anti-hypertensive medications, dry weight, and volume status.  The participant’s clinician will be 
contacted to consider the following interventions listed in the preferred order of implementation: 
1) Decrease non-study anti-hypertensive medication(s)  
2) Increase dry weight if there is no evidence of peripheral or pulmonary edema  
3) Reduce ultrafiltration rate by increasing dialysis session duration 
4) Reduce dose of study medication if: 
a. Peripheral or pulmonary edema is present  
 
AND 
b. There are no other anti-hypertensive medications prescribed OR other anti-
hypertensive medications should not be discontinued (e.g., beta blocker following 
myocardial infarction) 
5) Discontinue study medication when reduction below minimal dose is required 
 
Treating clinicians will be free to manage hypotension according to standard clinical practices and are 
not obligated to follow the study guidelines with respect to non-study medication, fluid removal rate, or 
dry weight.  In contrast, dose reduction or discontinuation of study drug will be directly managed by study 
staff in accordance with the guideline.  All enrolled participants will continue to be followed for the 
occurrence of adverse events and for end of study cardiac testing regardless of whether study 
medications are discontinued. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 23 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
6.8 
Headache or Gastrointestinal Symptoms 
In the event of persistent headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or anorexia without alternative cause, 
the dose of study medication may be reduced.   
6.9 
Imaging Studies 
6.9.1 
Echocardiography 
The primary echocardiographic endpoint, the early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E’), will be acquired 
using the apical 4-chamber view at both the septal and lateral positions at the junction of the LV wall 
with mitral annulus with the measurements averaged.  TDI images will be acquired using steerable pulse 
wave TDI according to standard techniques (typically >100 frames/s with a 2 mm sampling volume).  
Other standard echocardiographic measurements such as early (E) and late (A) mitral inflow velocity, LV 
mass index and LV ejection fraction will be obtained during each study.  Blinded analyses will be 
performed off-line using commercial software.  In addition, 3 cardiac cycles of 2D TDI data will be 
obtained at high frequency in the 3 standard apical views for offline measurement of strain rate (SR) and 
strain using strain quantification software.  Mean strain rate and peak systolic strain will be calculated 
by averaging across the basal segments of each wall.  
6.9.2 
PET Scan 
Individuals will refrain from smoking, exercise, caffeine-containing beverages, or methyl-xanthines for 
24 hours before PET studies. Vasoactive medications such as calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers or 
nitrates will also be withheld for 24 hours.  All participants will have PET scans performed while in a 
semi-fasting state. PET scans will be performed according to the standard rest and stress scanning 
protocol at Brigham & Women’s Hospital. In brief, a transmission scan will be acquired for correction of 
photon attenuation, and using 13N ammonia (~0.286 mCi/kg), myocardial blood flow (MBF) will be 
measured at rest.  This will be followed by a regadenoson infusion, adenosine infusion at a dose of 
0.14/mg/kg/min (61) or a dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg administered over 4 min) infusion, to induce 
hyperemia.  At peak hyperemia, a second dose of 13N ammonia will be injected and imaging repeated.  
Changes in systemic hemodynamics will be measured between baseline and hyperemia.  Visual 
interpretation of the gated myocardial perfusion images will be performed semi-quantitatively using a 
standard 5-point scoring system and 17 myocardial segments.  Summed rest (SRS) and stress scores 
(SSS) will be calculated as the sum of individual segmental scores, with the difference recorded as a 
summed difference score (SDS).   
 
Absolute MBF (in ml/g/min) will be computed blindly from the rest and stress images using commercial 
software and previously validated methods.  Serially acquired transaxial images will be re-oriented into 
short axis slices of the LV and assembled into serial polar maps, and blood pool (arterial input function) 
and tissue time-activity curves will be generated.  Regional and global rest and stress MBF will be 
calculated by fitting the 13N time-activity curves to a two-compartment tracer kinetic model.  CFR will be 
calculated as the ratio of absolute MBF at stress over rest for the entire left ventricle.  In the case of flow 
defects the primary measure of CFR used will be the CFR over flow defect-free portion of the LV. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 24 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
7 Statistical Plan  
7.1 
Sample Size Determination 
Sample size considerations were framed using standard study design parameters to ensure 80% power 
to detect pre-specified effect sizes utilizing intermediate outcomes.  However, for this early phase pilot 
study, the primary focus is directed at providing pilot efficacy, safety and feasibility information, with no 
attempt to create critical test result regions for standard hypothesis testing.  Results will nevertheless 
provide preliminary estimates needed to guide design of subsequent, more robust studies and will 
provide information on safety and tolerability events occurring at high event rates which can be 
incorporated into the design of further studies.   
With 8 participants per group, there will be 80% power to detect a change in CFR of 0.75 (unitless 
measure), assuming a common standard deviation for change in CFR of 0.5138-143.  Assuming the common 
SD of E’ is 2.0 cm/s and baseline is 5.8 ± 1.8 cm/s39, 144-146, we will be able to detect a difference of 3.0 
cm/s with 80% power. Changes of this magnitude have been observed in other settings144, 147, 148.  
Baseline variables will be presented using standard descriptive statistics according to distribution. 
P<0.05 will be considered significant without correction for multiple comparisons given the pilot nature 
of this proposal.   
Although the detectable change in each effect measure is large, detectable differences are, as noted 
above, clinically relevant.  Further, given the pilot nature of this study, additional trials will be required 
regardless of whether a significant difference in the efficacy measures is detected.  Point estimates and 
standard deviations around these measures will provide the needed estimates of expected change so 
that more robust studies can be designed. 
It is similarly noted that under the proposed sample size, estimates of safety and tolerability event rates 
will provide relatively crude estimates of the true event rates.  Confidence intervals around estimated 
event rates based on various observed event rates within the treatment (or control arm) will be large 
and are provided below for a range of detected event rates (Table 1).  As shown in Table 2, power to 
detect event rates ≥ 20% will be good while power to detect lower event rates within each study arm 
will be limited for events with a true rate <15%.    
Table 1.  Confidence interval for estimated event rates within each study arm 
Observed Events Observed Event Rate Low Bound 95% CI Upper Bound 95% CI 
0 
0.00 
0 
0.37 
1 
0.125 
0.00 
0.53 
2 
0.25 
0.32 
0.65 
5 
0.625 
0.24 
0.91 
8 
1.00 
0.63 
-- 
   
 
 
 
 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 25 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
Table 2. Detectable event rates 
True Event Rate Power (Detection Probability) 
0.05 
0.34 
0.10 
0.57 
0.15 
0.73 
0.20 
0.83 
0.25 
0.90 
0.30 
0.94 
 
7.2 
Randomization and Stratification 
To ensure balance in treatment assignments within potential confounders, a stratified randomization 
procedure, based on LVEF <=45% will be implemented.  Within each of these strata, participants will be 
randomly allocated to the ISD/HY or placebo in a ratio of 1:1.  
In order to maintain blinding, ISD, HY, and placebo preparations for each arm will have an identical 
appearance, and the same number of tablets will be prescribed for each participant.  The treatment 
assignment code, corresponding to each treatment identifier number, will be known only to the IDS, 
until the completion of treatment and data collection on all participants.  This information may also be 
known to the dispensing pharmacists.  The study participants, and all other members of the investigative 
team, will remain blinded to the treatment assignment, including the investigator, the biostatisticians, 
the study nurses, and referring physicians.   
7.3 
Intent-to-treat Analysis and Missing Data 
An intent-to-treat analysis, in which all available data on all randomized participants are included, will be 
used for the primary comparison of treatments.  All attempts will be made to keep missing data to a 
minimum, and participants who withdraw from treatment will be encouraged to continue on study in 
order to provide complete follow-up information.  Thus, irrespective of withdrawal from treatment, all 
participants should continue to be followed with all scheduled outcome evaluations until the end of the 
study.  However, it is expected that up to 10% of the randomized participants may withdraw prior to the 
final assessment of response at 26 weeks.  These participants will be included in the denominator for 
evaluation of the response rates defined for the primary endpoint. 
The characteristics at the time of randomization for those participants without complete follow-up will 
be examined; however, there will be limited statistical power to detect any but major differences 
between these participants and those with complete follow-up.  In addition, in order to assess the 
potential biases introduced by differential withdrawal among treatment arms, a comparison of 
withdrawal rates and/or time to withdrawal will be included as an ancillary analysis to the primary 
endpoint comparison. 
Secondary analyses will examine the all-treated, as-treated, and per-protocol populations as defined 
below.  Given the pilot nature of this study and small sample size, no corrections will be made for 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 26 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
multiplicity in these additional analyses.  The possibility of false-positive results is acknowledged and 
results of these analyses will be considered strictly exploratory.    
Nevertheless, these secondary analyses may provide important, hypothesis-forming insights into 
mechanism of action and optimal design for further studies in the event that significant deviations from 
the protocol or dropout from the study are felt to have had an important impact on the results. 
 
The analysis populations are defined as follows:  
• 
All-randomized / intention-to-treat (ITT) population:  Any participant randomized into the study, 
regardless of whether study drug was received. 
• 
As-treated population:  The as-treated population is the same as the ITT population (i.e., any 
participant randomized into the study regardless of whether study drug was received).  
However, for the as-treated analysis, patients in the active drug group who did not receive at 
least one dose of study drug will be classified into the placebo arm. 
• 
All-treated population:  Any participant randomized into the study who received at least one 
dose of study drug. 
• 
Per-protocol population:  Any participant who was appropriately randomized, and received the 
protocol-dictated study drug exposure (≥75% of prescribed doses) and endpoint assessments 
through 24 ± 2 weeks.   
Because dose-related efficacy and safety are important questions of interest in this study, the ITT 
analysis will be supplemented with an analysis of the as-treated population.  Although ITT approaches 
provide the least-biased analysis of treatment efficacy and safety, as-treated analyses provide important 
complementary information on  biological effectiveness of therapy (e.g. theoretical efficacy if drug were 
tolerated by all participants) and on the effects of actual doses used that is not captured by (ITT) 
analyses in which the unit of analysis is a randomized therapy that may not have been used by individual 
participants149.  For this reason, as-treated approaches provide important complementary information 
to ITT analyses and are typically mandated as an important secondary analyses of clinical trials by the 
FDA149.  Given a treatment protocol that allows for dose reduction of study medications, the as-treated 
analysis will provide critical information in this trial for assessing dose-related efficacy and the incidence 
of adverse events such as hypotension. As-treated analyses will assign treatment dose according to the 
dose used at the time of an adverse event (safety analyses) or according to the mean dose received 
during the trial (efficacy analysis). 
In general, missing data will not be imputed. Every effort will be made to use statistical methods that are 
robust to missingness, and the number of participants included with each analysis will be given with the 
results. 
7.4 
Statistical Methods 
In addition to the analyses described subsequently, descriptive statistics will be used during the course 
of the project as part of data management procedures for monitoring data quality.  A brief overview of 
some of the statistical methods that may be used at the time of analysis, both for descriptive purposes 
and in more comprehensive analysis of the primary research questions, is summarized in the following 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 27 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
sections.  It is recognized that these methods may be revised and additional ones considered as the 
details of the specific analyses are developed.  
Given the pilot nature of this study, the primary objectives of this study are to derive pilot estimates of 
efficacy and safety.  As noted above, given the small sample size, the power to detect small to medium 
effect sizes or adverse event rates will be limited. However, the point estimates and confidence intervals 
around effect sizes and adverse event rates are expected to provide information needed for the 
planning of future studies. 
7.4.1 
Descriptive Analysis 
Standard descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline characteristics and study outcome 
measures at each follow-up visit, both overall and within each treatment group.  Examination of 
baseline characteristics will include estimates of the distribution of age, race, and other demographic 
characteristics, lab measures and study center.  Summary statistics such as means, medians, and ranges 
will be produced for all measured variables.  Frequencies will be computed for all categorical and ordinal 
variables.  Graphical methods including stem-and-leaf diagrams and boxplots will be used to examine 
distributions, identify potential influential points, and guide in the choice of transformations, if 
warranted.   The balance of baseline measures across the treatment groups will be compared using 
appropriate k-sample tests, including Χ-Squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests. 
Analysis of Primary Efficacy and Safety Outcomes Mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile 
values) of baseline and end of study measurement in the primary endpoint E’ will be presented.  Change 
in E’ velocity or CFR at 26 weeks will be assessed and reported quantitatively, and descriptive statistics 
for absolute and % change will be provided.  Mixed effects linear regression models with baseline 
covariate adjustments will be used for assessment of treatment effects.  Model assumptions regarding 
homoscedasticity and normality will be examined using standard techniques.   
For the safety endpoints, tables with percent incidence and incidence rate (for events that can occur 
more than once during follow-up) will be prepared.  Differences in incidence and incidence-rate will be 
assessed using logistic regression or Poisson regression with factors for assigned treatment and the 
stratification variable.  In particular, for safety endpoints, we will investigate the potential shift in blood 
pressure in control and treatment groups with monthly measure of blood pressure.  We will use mixed 
effects linear regression models to assess the direction and time averaged magnitude of change in 
potassium, with and without controlling for baseline covariates.  The proportion of serious hypotension 
in treatment and control groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.  
The primary analysis will examine the intention to treat population.  Exploratory analyses will be 
repeated in the as-treated, all-treated and per-protocol populations (see Section 7.3) using analogous 
techniques.  P<0.05 will be considered significant in all analyses. 
7.4.2 
Secondary Analyses 
A number of secondary analyses will be conducted to evaluate the secondary efficacy outcomes. 
Secondary efficacy parameters include angiogenesis inhibitor concentration, circulating markers of 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 28 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
fibrosis, additional echocardiographic parameters, and additional PET parameters including change in 
resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flows between baseline and 26 weeks and change in LVMI 
between 0 and 26 weeks.  Analysis for these secondary outcomes will be similar to that for the primary 
outcome.  Distribution of the secondary parameters will be examined and appropriate transformation 
will be applied.  Because beta blockers may have effects on cardiac function, analyses will be performed 
to explore differences in efficacy outcomes between participants with and without beta blocker use at 
baseline.   
7.4.3 
Interim Analysis 
No interim analysis is planned. 
8 Safety and Adverse Events 
8.1 
Definitions 
Definitions are per the January 2007 Guidance on Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems 
Involving Risks to Participants or Others and Adverse Events, Office on Human Research Protection 
(OHRP) Guidance. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/advevntguid.html  
8.1.1 
Adverse Event 
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a human study participant, 
including any abnormal sign (for example, abnormal physical examination or laboratory finding), 
symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the participant’s involvement in the research, whether 
or not considered related to the participant’s participation in the research. 
8.1.2 
Serious Adverse Event 
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that is:  
• 
fatal or results in death 
• 
life-threatening 
• 
requires or prolongs hospital stay 
• 
results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity 
• 
results in congenital anomalies or birth defects 
• 
an important medical event* 
*Important medical events are those that may not be immediately life threatening, but are clearly of 
major clinical significance. 
8.1.3 
Unanticipated Problem Involving Risk to Participants or Others  
An Unanticipated Problem is any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the following 
criteria: 
• 
it is unexpected (in terms of nature, severity, or frequency) given the research procedures that 
are described in the IRB-approved research protocol and informed consent document and the 
characteristics of the participant population being studied; 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 29 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
• 
it is related or possibly related to participation in the research; possibly related means that there 
is a reasonable possibility that the incident, experience or outcome may have been caused by 
the procedures involved in the research, and 
• 
it suggests that the research places participants or others at a greater risk of harm (including 
physical, psychological, economic, or social harm) related to the research than was previously 
known or recognized. 
8.1.4 
Pre-Existing Condition 
A preexisting condition is one that is present at the start of the study.  A preexisting condition will be 
recorded as an adverse event if the frequency, intensity, or the character of the condition worsens 
during the study period. 
8.2 
Adverse Event Reporting Period 
The study period during which adverse events must be tracked and reported is defined as the period 
from the initiation of study procedures to study completion.   
8.2.1 
Post-study Adverse Events 
All unresolved adverse events will be followed by the investigator until the events are resolved, the 
participant is lost to follow-up, or the adverse event is otherwise explained.  At the last scheduled visit, 
the investigator will instruct each participant to report any subsequent event(s) that the participant, or 
the participant’s personal physician, believes might reasonably be related to participation in this study.  
The investigator will notify the Data Coordinating Center (DCC) of any death or adverse event occurring 
at any time after a participant has discontinued or terminated study participation that may reasonably 
be related to the study.   
8.3 
Recording of Adverse Events 
At each contact with the participant, the investigator or site designee will seek information on adverse 
events by specific questioning and, as appropriate, by examination.  Information on adverse events will 
be recorded in the source document, and also on the adverse event log case report form (CRF).  All 
signs, symptoms, and abnormal diagnostic procedure results relating to the same event will be recorded 
under one diagnosis name. 
8.3.1 
Anticipated Adverse Events 
The following adverse events are anticipated in the hemodialysis population and are not considered 
Unanticipated Problems.  Note that the designation as “Anticipated” does not imply that the event is not 
an SAE but relates to the regulatory definition of Unanticipated Problems as provided in Section 8.1.3. 
• 
Death 
• 
Coronary Ischemia including: 
o Unstable angina 
o Acute MI 
o Coronary revascularization 
• 
Heart failure hospitalization or exacerbation 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 30 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
• 
Cardiac arrest 
• 
Cardiac arrhythmia (ventricular or atrial) 
• 
Peripheral vascular revascularization 
• 
Amputation 
• 
Hypotension 
• 
Vomiting 
• 
Vascular Access Events Including: 
o Catheter exchange, removal or declotting 
o Arteriovenous graft or fistula complications 
 
Clotting 
 
Stenosis 
 
Revascularization 
 
Infection 
• 
Infections Including: 
o Pneumonia 
o Bacteremia 
o Hemodialysis vascular access infection  
 
The following adverse events are anticipated in patients treated with ISD, HY: 
• 
Hypotension 
• 
Headache 
• 
Gastrointestinal symptoms including diarrhea, constipation and nausea 
• 
Rash 
• 
Edema 
• 
Flushing 
• 
Nasal congestion 
• 
Light-headedness 
8.3.2 
Non-Reportable Events 
The hemodialysis population is characterized by frequent laboratory testing and a high rate of peri-
dialytic hypotensive events requiring change in the dialysis prescription, adjustment of dry weight or 
change in dialysis-related medications.  Due to the unique nature of this population, the following 
events are considered routine aspects of chronic dialysis therapy and they will not be considered to 
meet the criteria of SAE in this study except as noted: 
• 
Anemia—will be reported only when hemoglobin <8.0 mg/dL 
• 
Hyperphosphatemia—will be reported only when phosphate >9.5 mg/dL 
• 
Hypocalcemia—will be reported only when serum calcium <7.0 mg/dL 
• 
Hypercalcemia—will be reported only when serum calcium >11.0 mg/dL 
• 
Hyperparathyroidism—will be reported only when PTH>1000 pg/mL 
• 
Hypotension—will be reported only when requiring emergency room visit or hospitalization 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 31 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
• 
Hyperkalemia—will be reported only when >7.0 mEq/L 
• 
Hypokalemia—will be reported only when <3.0 mEq/L 
8.4 
Reporting of Serious Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems 
Study sites are required to report SAEs to the DCC within 24 hours of first knowledge of the event.  To 
report such events, an SAE form will be completed by the investigator and faxed or emailed to the 
DCC.  The DCC will facilitate the timely medical review and reporting of the event, and provide reports to 
the NIDDK and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) in accordance with DSMB-approved study 
policies and regulatory requirements (see Section 8.5.1 for details of the DSMB). 
The investigator will keep a copy of the SAE form on file at the study site.  At the time of the initial 
report, the following information should be provided: 
 
Study identifier 
 
Study Center 
 
Participant number 
 
A description of the event 
 
Date of onset 
 
Current status 
 
Whether study treatment was discontinued 
 
The reason why the event is classified as serious 
 
Investigator assessment of the association 
between the event and study participation 
 
Within the following 7 days, the investigator will provide further information on the SAE or the 
unanticipated problem in the form of a written narrative.  This should include a copy of the completed 
SAE form, and any other diagnostic information that will assist in the understanding of the event.  
Significant new information on ongoing serious adverse events should be provided promptly to the DCC. 
If a participant becomes pregnant while participating in the study it will be reported as an adverse event 
and will trigger the collection of additional documentation about the pregnancy.  Pregnancy outcomes 
will be collected, including the outcome of the infant and if the pregnancy was terminated.  This 
information will be submitted to the University of Pennsylvania IRB, and to the local site IRB as required. 
SAEs that are still ongoing at the end of the study period must be followed up to determine the final 
outcome.  Any SAE that occurs after the study period and is considered to be possibly related to the 
study treatment or study participation should be recorded and reported immediately. 
8.4.1 
Investigator Reporting to the IRB 
The site investigator will report SAEs and Unanticipated problems to the clinical center IRB in 
accordance with the reporting requirements of the local IRB or with the Office of Human Research 
Protections (OHRP) guidelines, whichever is sooner.  OHRP recommends that: 
1) Unanticipated problems that are serious adverse events should be reported to the IRB within 1 
week of the investigator becoming aware of the event; and   

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 32 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
2) Any other unanticipated problem should be reported to the IRB within 2 weeks of the 
investigator becoming aware of the problem.  
Reporting Process 
Unanticipated problems posing risks to participants or others as noted above will be reported using the 
appropriate IRB-designated form or as a written report of the event (including a description of the event 
with information regarding its fulfillment of the above criteria, follow-up/resolution and need for 
revision to consent form and/or other study documentation). 
Copies of each report and documentation of IRB notification and receipt will be maintained in the 
Clinical Center Investigator’s study file. 
Other Reportable Events: 
• 
Any adverse event that would cause the study’s Steering Committee to modify the protocol 
or informed consent form, or would prompt other action by the IRB to assure protection of 
human participants. 
• 
Information that indicates a change to the risks or potential benefits of the research, in 
terms of severity or frequency.  
• 
Breach of confidentiality 
• 
Change to the protocol made without prior IRB review to eliminate apparent immediate 
hazard to a research participant. 
• 
Incarceration of a participant when the research was not previously approved under 45 CFR 
part 46 subpart C and the investigator believes it is in the best interest of the participant to 
remain in the study. 
• 
Complaint of a participant when the complaint indicates unexpected risks or the complaint 
cannot be resolved by the research team. 
• 
Protocol violation (meaning an accidental or unintentional deviation from the IRB approved 
protocol) that in the opinion of the investigator placed one or more participants at increased 
risk, or affects the rights or welfare of participants. 
8.4.2 
DCC Notification to Study Investigator 
The DCC will notify the study principal investigator, in a written safety report, of any adverse event that 
meets the criteria of an unanticipated and related event as described in Section 8.1.3.   
8.5 
Medical Monitoring 
The Clinical Center Principal Investigator will be responsible for overseeing the safety of the study at 
his/her site.  This safety monitoring will include careful assessment and appropriate reporting of adverse 
events as noted above, as well as the construction and implementation of a site data and safety-
monitoring plan.  Medical monitoring will include a regular assessment of the number and type of 
serious adverse events. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 33 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
8.5.1 
Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) 
The information provided in this section of the protocol is a general description of the DSMB 
responsibilities and processes.  A DSMB charter for the Hemodialysis Novel Therapies Consortium 
includes additional detail.   
A DSMB has been established by the NIDDK and provides input to the Institute.  The DSMB is comprised 
of individuals with expertise in clinical trials design and methodology, biostatistics, clinical nephrology 
and other relevant medical specialties.  The DSMB members are not affiliated with the study and are 
appointed by the NIDDK.  DSMB members will be free of conflicts of interest that could be affected by 
the outcomes of the study.  During the study, DSMB members who develop real or perceived conflicts of 
interest that impact objectivity will disclose them to NIDDK project officers, who will arrange for 
replacement of the member, if indicated.  
The DSMB will review the protocol before initiation of the study. After initial approval during the course 
of the study, the primary responsibilities of the DSMB will be to: 
1) Review safety data and provide input to protect the safety of the study participants; 
2) Provide input on major changes to the research protocol and plans for data and safety monitoring;  
3) Provide input on the progress of the study, including periodic assessments of data quality and 
timeliness, participant recruitment, accrual and retention, participant risk versus benefit, 
performance of the study site, and other factors that may affect study outcomes;  
4) Consider factors external to the study when relevant information becomes available, such as 
scientific or therapeutic developments that may have an impact on the need for continuation of 
the study, safety of the participants or the ethics of the study;  
5) Provide input on modification of the study protocol or possible early termination of the study 
because of attainment of study objectives, safety concerns, or inadequate performance (such as 
enrollment and retention problems). 
9 Data Management 
An internet based data management system will be used to collect, store and manage study data.  Site 
personnel will enter data directly into the database using electronic case report forms (CRFs) developed 
by the PI, statistician, and study investigator.  Data entry screens will incorporate range and logical edit 
checks, within and across forms. Data entry will be followed with manual and programmed checks and 
edits for errors and omissions. A data monitoring plan will serve as a reference guide for the 
development of case report forms (paper and electronic versions), data management conventions, 
reporting, data dictionaries, supporting meta data, as well as project closeout activities, communication 
and coordination plans among the study teams and staff. 
9.1.1 
Quality Control Activities 
Manual of Procedures (MOP) - The MOP will describe the sequence of study conduct and provide 
detailed instruction for the performance of screening, baseline, enrollment, treatment allocation and 
follow-up procedures. The MOP will provide instruction in case report form completion, use of the 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 34 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
electronic data management system, and collection, documentation and transfer of specimens and tests 
to laboratories and reading centers.  
Internal quality control procedures - A data validation plan, rule set specifications, and programming 
logic to implement data validation rules will be implemented.  
9.1.2 
Routine reports 
The study team will develop a set of standard enrollment, tracking, quality review, and safety 
monitoring reports. Adverse event reports, DSMB reports and reports for statistical analysis will be 
developed and produced on an appropriate schedule.  
9.2 
Data Security 
The data management system will be designed to prevent unauthorized access to trial data and to 
prevent data loss due to equipment failure or catastrophic events. The procedures to do so encompass 
user account management, user privilege assignment, data loss prevention (database backup), and DMS 
change management. User access will be controlled by assignment of confidential usernames, 
passwords. 
Study data collected at the clinical sites will be entered into a web-based electronic data capture system.  
This data management system uses a secure connection between the client browser at the clinical site 
and the web server at the DCC.  Data transmitted over this connection is authenticated by the use of 
digital certificates and is encrypted as it travels the Internet. 
The statistical project team will collaborate with the Investigational Drug Service (IDS) to protect the 
blinding of treatment assignments and electronic access to information that could indirectly or directly 
lead to unblinding treatment assignment or codes. Internal access to such information is stored in 
password-protected files. 
9.2.1 
Confidentiality 
Information about study participants will be kept confidential and managed according to the 
requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).  Those 
regulations require a signed participant authorization informing the participant of the following:  
a. What protected health information (PHI) will be collected from participants in this study 
b. Who will have access to that information and why 
c. Who will use or disclose that information 
d. The rights of a research participant to revoke their authorization for use of their PHI.  
In the event that a participant revokes authorization to collect or use PHI, the investigator, by 
regulation, retains the ability to use all information collected prior to the revocation of participant 
authorization.  For participants who have revoked authorization to collect or use PHI, attempts should 
be made to obtain permission to collect at least vital status (i.e. that the participant is alive) at the end 
of their scheduled study period. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 35 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
9.3 
Source Documents 
Source data is all information, original records of clinical findings, observations, or other activities in a 
clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial.  Source data are contained in 
source documents.  Examples of these original documents, and data records include: hospital records, 
clinical and office charts, laboratory notes, memoranda, participants’ diaries or evaluation checklists, 
pharmacy dispensing records, recorded data from automated instruments, copies or transcriptions 
certified after verification as being accurate and complete, microfiches, photographic negatives, 
microfilm or magnetic media, x-rays, participant files, and records kept at the pharmacy, at the 
laboratories, and at medico-technical departments involved in the clinical trial. 
9.3.1 
Maintaining Anonymity of Submitted Medical Records 
Clinical site personnel will de-identify all medical records before sending them to the data coordinating 
center. 
9.3.2 
Data Sharing 
It is required that research results generated under sponsorship by NIH are made available to the 
scientific community and public in a timely manner.  The primary method by which data are shared with 
the scientific community is through peer-reviewed publications and presentation at meetings. In 
addition, data and results created from NIH supported research will be submitted to NIH in the annual 
progress reports required under the terms and conditions of this award.  This study will also be 
registered with clinicaltrials.gov. 
Data from this study will be submitted to the NIDDK Data Repository in accordance with the NIDDK Data 
Sharing policy.  The policy requires that data sets be transferred no later than 2 years after study 
completion or 1 year after publication of the primary results, whichever comes first.  Through the 
repository, the study data will be made available to external investigator.   
9.3.3 
Records Retention 
The site investigator will retain study documents, including participant files and Investigational Binders, 
for at least 5 years after the close of the study, or longer depending on site institutional requirements. 
10 Study Monitoring, Auditing, and Inspecting 
10.1 Study Monitoring Plan 
Given the small size and single center nature of the study, there will be no external monitoring.  
However, the principal investigator will allocate adequate time for monitoring activities, study binders, 
and case report forms with study personnel.   
10.2 Auditing and Inspecting 
The investigator will permit study-related monitoring, audits, and inspections by the EC/IRB, the NIH, 
government regulatory bodies, and University compliance and quality assurance groups of all study 
related documents (e.g. source documents, regulatory documents, data collection instruments, study 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 36 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
data etc.).  The investigator will ensure the capability for inspections of applicable study-related facilities 
(e.g. pharmacy, diagnostic laboratory, etc.). 
Participation as an investigator in this study implies acceptance of potential inspection by government 
regulatory authorities and applicable University compliance and quality assurance offices. 
11 Ethical Considerations 
This study is to be conducted according to US and international standards of Good Clinical Practice (FDA 
Title 21 part 312 and International Conference on Harmonization guidelines), applicable government 
regulations and Institutional research policies and procedures. 
This protocol and any amendments will be submitted to a properly constituted independent Ethics 
Committee (EC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB), in agreement with local legal prescriptions, for 
formal approval of the study conduct.  The decision of the EC/IRB concerning the conduct of the study 
will be made in writing to the investigator and a copy of this decision will be provided to the sponsor 
before commencement of this study. 
All participants for this study will be provided a consent form describing this study and providing 
sufficient information for participants to make an informed decision about their participation in this 
study.  This consent form will be submitted with the protocol for review and approval by the EC/IRB for 
the study.  The formal consent of a participant, using the EC/IRB-approved consent form, must be 
obtained before that participant undergoes any study procedure.  The consent form must be signed by 
the participant or legally acceptable surrogate, and the investigator-designated research professional 
obtaining the consent.  
12 Study Finances 
12.1 Funding Source 
This study is financed through a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Diseases of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. 
12.2 Conflict of Interest 
The study investigator will follow the conflict of interest policies of the National Institutes of Health as 
well as their home institution. Any investigator who has a potential conflict of interest with this study 
(patent ownership, royalties, or financial gain greater than the minimum allowable by their institution, 
etc.) must have the conflict reviewed by a properly constituted Conflict of Interest Committee with a 
Committee-sanctioned conflict management plan that has been reviewed and approved by the study 
sponsor prior to participation in this study 
12.3 Participant Stipend 
Participants will be compensated $400 plus travel expenses for time and effort required to participate in 
the study.  Stipends will be distributed in equal payments after the completion of the first and second 
PET scans. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 37 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
13 Publication Plan 
Study results will be published in peer reviewed manuscript and presented in preliminary form at annual 
meetings of national societies or research meetings.  Every effort will be made to publish results within a 
year of final receipt of locked study data sets.  
 
 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 38 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
14 References 
1. 
Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, Manzi J, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F and Levey AS. 
Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. Jama. 2007;298:2038-47. 
2. 
Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE and Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of 
death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296-305. 
3. 
Debella YT, Giduma HD, Light RP and Agarwal R. Chronic Kidney Disease as a Coronary Disease 
Equivalent--a Comparison with Diabetes over a Decade. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011. 
4. 
Collins AJ, Li S, Gilbertson DT, Liu J, Chen SC and Herzog CA. Chronic kidney disease and 
cardiovascular disease in the Medicare population. Kidney Int Suppl. 2003:S24-31. 
5. 
Anavekar NS, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Solomon SD, Kober L, Rouleau JL, White HD, 
Nordlander R, Maggioni A, Dickstein K, Zelenkofske S, Leimberger JD, Califf RM and Pfeffer MA. 
Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N 
Engl J Med. 2004;351:1285-95. 
6. 
Al Suwaidi J, Reddan DN, Williams K, Pieper KS, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Granger CB, Ohman 
EM and Holmes DR, Jr. Prognostic implications of abnormalities in renal function in patients with 
acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002;106:974-80. 
7. 
Murphy SW. Management of heart failure and coronary artery disease in patients with chronic 
kidney disease. Semin Dial. 2003;16:165-72. 
8. 
Stenvinkel P, Carrero JJ, Axelsson J, Lindholm B, Heimburger O and Massy Z. Emerging 
biomarkers for evaluating cardiovascular risk in the chronic kidney disease patient: how do new 
pieces fit into the uremic puzzle? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:505-21. 
9. 
Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Cushman M, Manolio TA, Peterson D, Stehman-Breen C, Bleyer A, Newman 
A, Siscovick D and Psaty B. Cardiovascular mortality risk in chronic kidney disease: comparison of 
traditional and novel risk factors. JAMA. 2005;293:1737-45. 
10. 
Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Elsayed EF, Griffith JL, Salem DN, Levey AS and Sarnak MJ. The 
Framingham predictive instrument in chronic kidney disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:217-24. 
11. 
Himmelfarb J, Stenvinkel P, Ikizler TA and Hakim RM. The elephant in uremia: oxidant stress as a 
unifying concept of cardiovascular disease in uremia. Kidney Int. 2002;62:1524-38. 
12. 
The SHARP Collaborative Group. Should We Reduce LDL Choleterol in Patients with Chronic 
Kidney Disease? The Reuslts of the Study of heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). American 
Society of Nephrology. 2010. 
13. 
Wanner C, Krane V, Marz W, Olschewski M, Asmus HG, Kramer W, Kuhn KW, Kutemeyer H, Mann 
JF, Ruf G and Ritz E. Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in 
patients with type 2 diabetes on hemodialysis (4D study): demographic and baseline 
characteristics. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2004;27:259-66. 
14. 
Zannad F, Kessler M, Lehert P, Grunfeld JP, Thuilliez C, Leizorovicz A and Lechat P. Prevention of 
cardiovascular events in end-stage renal disease: results of a randomized trial of fosinopril and 
implications for future studies. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1318-24. 
15. 
Wali RK, Iyengar M, Beck GJ, Chartyan DM, Chonchol M, Lukas MA, Cooper C, Himmelfarb J, 
Weir MR, Berl T, Henrich WL and Cheung AK. Efficacy and safety of carvedilol in treatment of heart 
failure with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ Heart Fail. 4:18-26. 
16. 
Gilbertson DT, Liu J, Xue JL, Louis TA, Solid CA, Ebben JP and Collins AJ. Projecting the number 
of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2015. J Am Soc Nephrol. 
2005;16:3736-41. 
17. 
U.S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2010 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in 
the United States. 2010. 
18. 
Pun PH, Smarz TR, Honeycutt EF, Shaw LK, Al-Khatib SM and Middleton JP. Chronic kidney 
disease is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death among patients with coronary 
artery disease. Kidney Int. 2009;76:652-8. 
19. 
Jacobi J, Porst M, Cordasic N, Namer B, Schmieder RE, Eckardt KU and Hilgers KF. Subtotal 
nephrectomy impairs ischemia-induced angiogenesis and hindlimb re-perfusion in rats. Kidney Int. 
2006;69:2013-21. 
20. 
Amann K, Hofstetter J, Campean V, Koch A, Gross ML, Veelken R and Ritz E. Nonhypotensive 
dose of beta-adrenergic blocker ameliorates capillary deficits in the hearts of rats with moderate 
renal failure. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:207-14. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 39 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
21. 
Amann K, Neimeier KA, Schwarz U, Tornig J, Matthias S, Orth SR, Mall G and Ritz E. Rats with 
moderate renal failure show capillary deficit in heart but not skeletal muscle. Am J Kidney Dis. 
1997;30:382-8. 
22. 
Amann K, Wiest G, Zimmer G, Gretz N, Ritz E and Mall G. Reduced capillary density in the 
myocardium of uremic rats--a stereological study. Kidney Int. 1992;42:1079-85. 
23. 
Dikow R, Kihm LP, Zeier M, Kapitza J, Tornig J, Amann K, Tiefenbacher C and Ritz E. Increased 
infarct size in uremic rats: reduced ischemia tolerance? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1530-6. 
24. 
Tyralla K and Amann K. Morphology of the heart and arteries in renal failure. Kidney Int Suppl. 
2003:S80-3. 
25. 
Dikow R, Schmidt U, Kihm LP, Schaier M, Schwenger V, Gross ML, Katus HA, Zeier M and Hardt 
SE. Uremia aggravates left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Am J Nephrol. 
2010;32:13-22. 
26. 
Amann K, Breitbach M, Ritz E and Mall G. Myocyte/capillary mismatch in the heart of uremic 
patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:1018-22. 
27. 
Chade AR, Brosh D, Higano ST, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO and Lerman A. Mild renal insufficiency is 
associated with reduced coronary flow in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. 
Kidney Int. 2006;69:266-71. 
28. 
Koivuviita N, Tertti R, Jarvisalo M, Pietila M, Hannukainen J, Sundell J, Nuutila P, Knuuti J and 
Metsarinne K. Increased basal myocardial perfusion in patients with chronic kidney disease without 
symptomatic coronary artery disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:2773-9. 
29. 
Tok D, Gullu H, Erdogan D, Topcu S, Ciftci O, Yildirim I and Muderrisoglu H. Impaired coronary flow 
reserve in hemodialysis patients: a transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic study. Nephron Clin 
Pract. 2005;101:c200-6. 
30. 
Charytan DM, Shelbert HR and Di Carli MF. Coronary microvascular function in early chronic 
kidney disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;3:663-71. 
31. 
Sezer M, Ozcan M, Okcular I, Elitok A, Umman S, Umman B, Tayyareci Y, Olcay A, Nisanci Y, 
Bilge AK and Meric M. A potential evidence to explain the reason behind the devastating prognosis 
of coronary artery disease in uraemic patients: Renal insufficiency is associated with poor coronary 
collateral vessel development. Int J Cardiol. 2006;115:366-72. 
32. 
Mark PB, Johnston N, Groenning BA, Foster JE, Blyth KG, Martin TN, Steedman T, Dargie HJ and 
Jardine AG. Redefinition of uremic cardiomyopathy by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic 
resonance imaging. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1839-45. 
33. 
Foley RN, Curtis BM, Randell EW and Parfrey PS. Left ventricular hypertrophy in new hemodialysis 
patients without symptomatic cardiac disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 5:805-13. 
34. 
de Almeida EA, de Oliveira EI, Lopes JA, Almeida AG, Lopes MG and Prata MM. Diastolic function 
in several stages of chronic kidney disease in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney 
disease: a tissue Doppler imaging study. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2007;30:234-9. 
35. 
Afshinnia F, Spitalewitz S, Chou SY, Gunsburg DZ and Chadow HL. Left ventricular geometry and 
renal function in hypertensive patients with diastolic heart failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49:227-36. 
36. 
Edwards NC, Ferro CJ, Townend JN and Steeds RP. Aortic distensibility and arterial-ventricular 
coupling in early chronic kidney disease: a pattern resembling heart failure with preserved ejection 
fraction. Heart. 2008;94:1038-43. 
37. 
Masugata H, Senda S, Goda F, Yamagami A, Okuyama H, Kohno T, Hosomi N, Yukiiri K, Noma T, 
Imai M, Kiyomoto H, Nishiyama A and Kohno M. Echocardiographic assessment of the cardio-renal 
connection: is left ventricular hypertrophy or diastolic function more closely correlated with 
estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with cardiovascular risk factors? Clin Exp Hypertens. 
2010;32:113-20. 
38. 
Bruch C, Rothenburger M, Gotzmann M, Wichter T, Scheld HH, Breithardt G and Gradaus R. 
Chronic kidney disease in patients with chronic heart failure--impact on intracardiac conduction, 
diastolic function and prognosis. Int J Cardiol. 2007;118:375-80. 
39. 
Wang AY, Wang M, Lam CW, Chan IH, Zhang Y and Sanderson JE. Left ventricular filling pressure 
by Doppler echocardiography in patients with end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2008;52:107-
14. 
40. 
U.S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in 
the United States. 2008. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 40 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
41. 
Aiello S, Noris M, Todeschini M, Zappella S, Foglieni C, Benigni A, Corna D, Zoja C, Cavallotti D 
and Remuzzi G. Renal and systemic nitric oxide synthesis in rats with renal mass reduction. Kidney 
Int. 1997;52:171-81. 
42. 
Blum M, Yachnin T, Wollman Y, Chernihovsky T, Peer G, Grosskopf I, Kaplan E, Silverberg D, 
Cabili S and Iaina A. Low nitric oxide production in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephron. 
1998;79:265-8. 
43. 
Schmidt RJ and Baylis C. Total nitric oxide production is low in patients with chronic renal disease. 
Kidney Int. 2000;58:1261-6. 
44. 
Schmidt RJ, Yokota S, Tracy TS, Sorkin MI and Baylis C. Nitric oxide production is low in end-stage 
renal disease patients on peritoneal dialysis. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:F794-7. 
45. 
Wever R, Boer P, Hijmering M, Stroes E, Verhaar M, Kastelein J, Versluis K, Lagerwerf F, van Rijn 
H, Koomans H and Rabelink T. Nitric oxide production is reduced in patients with chronic renal 
failure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:1168-72. 
46. 
Nanayakkara PW, Teerlink T, Stehouwer CD, Allajar D, Spijkerman A, Schalkwijk C, ter Wee PM 
and van Guldener C. Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) concentration is independently 
associated with carotid intima-media thickness and plasma soluble vascular cell adhesion 
molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) concentration in patients with mild-to-moderate renal failure. Kidney Int. 
2005;68:2230-6. 
47. 
Kumagai H, Sakurai M, Takita T, Maruyama Y, Uno S, Ikegaya N, Kato A and Hishida A. 
Association of homocysteine and asymmetric dimethylarginine with atherosclerosis and 
cardiovascular events in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48:797-805. 
48. 
Fleck C, Janz A, Schweitzer F, Karge E, Schwertfeger M and Stein G. Serum concentrations of 
asymmetric (ADMA) and symmetric (SDMA) dimethylarginine in renal failure patients. Kidney Int 
Suppl. 2001;78:S14-8. 
49. 
Zoccali C, Bode-Boger S, Mallamaci F, Benedetto F, Tripepi G, Malatino L, Cataliotti A, Bellanuova 
I, Fermo I, Frolich J and Boger R. Plasma concentration of asymmetrical dimethylarginine and 
mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358:2113-7. 
50. 
Shi B, Ni Z, Zhou W, Yu Z, Gu L, Mou S, Fang W, Wang Q, Cao L, Yan Y and Qian J. Circulating 
levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine are an independent risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy 
and predict cardiovascular events in pre-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Eur J Intern 
Med. 2010;21:444-8. 
51. 
Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Maas R, Benedetto FA, Tripepi G, Malatino LS, Cataliotti A, Bellanuova I 
and Boger R. Left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac remodeling and asymmetric dimethylarginine 
(ADMA) in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62:339-45. 
52. 
Fujii H, Takiuchi S, Kawano Y and Fukagawa M. Putative role of asymmetric dimethylarginine in 
microvascular disease of kidney and heart in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:650-
6. 
53. 
Ebinc FA, Erten Y, Ebinc H, Pasaoglu H, Demirtas C, Tacoy G, Mutluay R, Koc E, Derici U, Reis 
KA, Bali M, Arinsoy T and Sindel S. The relationship among asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) 
levels, residual renal function, and left ventricular hypertrophy in continuous ambulatory peritoneal 
dialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2008;30:401-6. 
54. 
Aucella F, Maas R, Vigilante M, Tripepi G, Schwedhelm E, Margaglione M, Gesualdo L, Boeger R 
and Zoccali C. Methylarginines and mortality in patients with end stage renal disease: a prospective 
cohort study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:541-5. 
55. 
Yilmaz MI, Saglam M, Caglar K, Cakir E, Ozgurtas T, Sonmez A, Eyileten T, Yenicesu M, Acikel C, 
Oguz Y, Ozcan O, Bozlar U, Erbil K, Aslan I and Vural A. Endothelial functions improve with 
decrease 
in 
asymmetric 
dimethylarginine 
(ADMA) 
levels 
after 
renal 
transplantation. 
Transplantation. 2005;80:1660-6. 
56. 
Feng Y, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Zhang Q and Liu W. The mechanism of long-term low-dose 
asymmetric dimethylarginine inducing transforming growth factor-beta expression in endothelial 
cells. Int J Mol Med. 2013;31:67-74. 
57. 
Mihout F, Shweke N, Bige N, Jouanneau C, Dussaule JC, Ronco P, Chatziantoniou C and Boffa JJ. 
Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) induces chronic kidney disease through a mechanism 
involving collagen and TGF-beta1 synthesis. J Pathol. 2011;223:37-45. 
58. 
Akhurst RJ and Hata A. Targeting the TGFbeta signalling pathway in disease. Nat Rev Drug 
Discov. 2012;11:790-811. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 41 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
59. 
Mahler GJ, Farrar EJ and Butcher JT. Inflammatory cytokines promote mesenchymal 
transformation in embryonic and adult valve endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 
2013;33:121-30. 
60. 
Sales VL, Engelmayr GC, Jr., Mettler BA, Johnson JA, Jr., Sacks MS and Mayer JE, Jr. 
Transforming growth factor-beta1 modulates extracellular matrix production, proliferation, and 
apoptosis of endothelial progenitor cells in tissue-engineering scaffolds. Circulation. 2006;114:I193-
9. 
61. 
Zeisberg EM, Tarnavski O, Zeisberg M, Dorfman AL, McMullen JR, Gustafsson E, Chandraker A, 
Yuan X, Pu WT, Roberts AB, Neilson EG, Sayegh MH, Izumo S and Kalluri R. Endothelial-to-
mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. Nat Med. 2007;13:952-61. 
62. 
Jacobi J, Maas R, Cordasic N, Koch K, Schmieder RE, Boger RH and Hilgers KF. Role of 
asymmetric dimethylarginine for angiotensin II-induced target organ damage in mice. Am J Physiol 
Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294:H1058-66. 
63. 
Matsumoto Y, Kageyama S, Yakushigawa T, Arihara K, Sugiyama T, Mori Y, Sugiyama H, Ohmura 
H and Shio N. Long-term low-dose spironolactone therapy is safe in oligoanuric hemodialysis 
patients. Cardiology. 2009;114:32-8. 
64. 
O'Riordan E, Mendelev N, Patschan S, Patschan D, Eskander J, Cohen-Gould L, Chander P and 
Goligorsky MS. Chronic NOS inhibition actuates endothelial-mesenchymal transformation. Am J 
Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H285-94. 
65. 
Hasegawa K, Wakino S, Tatematsu S, Yoshioka K, Homma K, Sugano N, Kimoto M, Hayashi K 
and Itoh H. Role of asymmetric dimethylarginine in vascular injury in transgenic mice 
overexpressing dimethylarginie dimethylaminohydrolase 2. Circ Res. 2007;101:e2-10. 
66. 
Paulis L, Matuskova J, Adamcova M, Pelouch V, Simko J, Krajcirovicova K, Potacova A, Hulin I, 
Janega P, Pechanova O and Simko F. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and aortic 
remodelling in NO-deficient hypertensive rats: effect of L-arginine and spironolactone. Acta Physiol 
(Oxf). 2008;194:45-55. 
67. 
Oestreicher EM, Martinez-Vasquez D, Stone JR, Jonasson L, Roubsanthisuk W, Mukasa K and 
Adler GK. Aldosterone and not plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is a critical mediator of early 
angiotensin 
II/NG-nitro-L-arginine 
methyl 
ester-induced 
myocardial 
injury. 
Circulation. 
2003;108:2517-23. 
68. 
Simko F, Matuskova J, Luptak I, Pincikova T, Krajcirovicova K, Stvrtina S, Pomsar J, Pelouch V, 
Paulis L and Pechanova O. Spironolactone differently influences remodeling of the left ventricle and 
aorta in L-NAME-induced hypertension. Physiol Res. 2007;56 Suppl 2:S25-32. 
69. 
Martinez DV, Rocha R, Matsumura M, Oestreicher E, Ochoa-Maya M, Roubsanthisuk W, Williams 
GH and Adler GK. Cardiac damage prevention by eplerenone: comparison with low sodium diet or 
potassium loading. Hypertension. 2002;39:614-8. 
70. 
Kazakov A, Muller P, Jagoda P, Semenov A, Bohm M and Laufs U. Endothelial nitric oxide 
synthase of the bone marrow regulates myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis, and angiogenesis. 
Cardiovasc Res. 2012;93:397-405. 
71. 
Zhao X, Lu X and Feng Q. Deficiency in endothelial nitric oxide synthase impairs myocardial 
angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;283:H2371-8. 
72. 
Chen LL, Yin H and Huang J. Inhibition of TGF-beta1 signaling by eNOS gene transfer improves 
ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction through angiogenesis and reduction of apoptosis. 
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2007;16:221-30. 
73. 
Kupatt C, Hinkel R, von Bruhl ML, Pohl T, Horstkotte J, Raake P, El Aouni C, Thein E, Dimmeler S, 
Feron O and Boekstegers P. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase overexpression provides a 
functionally relevant angiogenic switch in hibernating pig myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 
2007;49:1575-84. 
74. 
Feelisch M, Brands F and Kelm M. Human endothelial cells bioactivate organic nitrates to nitric 
oxide: implications for the reinforcement of endothelial defence mechanisms. Eur J Clin Invest. 
1995;25:737-45. 
75. 
Salvemini D, Pistelli A and Vane J. Conversion of glyceryl trinitrate to nitric oxide in tolerant and 
non-tolerant smooth muscle and endothelial cells. British journal of pharmacology. 1993;108:162-9. 
76. 
Kleschyov AL, Oelze M, Daiber A, Huang Y, Mollnau H, Schulz E, Sydow K, Fichtlscherer B, 
Mulsch A and Munzel T. Does nitric oxide mediate the vasodilator activity of nitroglycerin? Circ Res. 
2003;93:e104-12. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 42 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
77. 
Mulsch A, Bara A, Mordvintcev P, Vanin A and Busse R. Specificity of different organic nitrates to 
elicit NO formation in rabbit vascular tissues and organs in vivo. British journal of pharmacology. 
1995;116:2743-9. 
78. 
Jiang HB, Yoneyama H, Furukawa A, Hamamoto T, Takahara J and Ichikawa Y. Effect of 
isosorbide dinitrate on nitric oxide synthase under hypoxia. Pharmacology. 2001;62:10-6. 
79. 
Mason RP and Cockcroft JR. Targeting nitric oxide with drug therapy. J Clin Hypertens 
(Greenwich). 2006;8:40-52. 
80. 
Daiber A, Wenzel P, Oelze M and Munzel T. New insights into bioactivation of organic nitrates, 
nitrate tolerance and cross-tolerance. Clin Res Cardiol. 2008;97:12-20. 
81. 
Roccatello D, Mengozzi G, Ferro M, Cesano G, Polloni R, Mosso R, Bonetti G, Inconis T, Paradisi 
L, Sena LM and et al. Isosorbide 5 mononitrate administration increases nitric oxide blood levels 
and reduces proteinuria in IgA glomerulonephritis patients with abnormal urinary endothelin/cyclic 
GMP ratio. Clin Nephrol. 1995;44:163-9. 
82. 
Shimamura S, Endo H, Kutsuna H, Kobayashi M, Hirao H, Shimizu M, Tanaka R and Yamane Y. 
Effect of intermittent administration of sustained release isosorbide dinitrate (sr-ISDN) in rats with 
pressure-overload heart. J Vet Med Sci. 2006;68:213-7. 
83. 
Ruiz-Hurtado G, Fernandez-Velasco M, Mourelle M and Delgado C. LA419, a novel nitric oxide 
donor, prevents pathological cardiac remodeling in pressure-overloaded rats via endothelial nitric 
oxide synthase pathway regulation. Hypertension. 2007;50:1049-56. 
84. 
McDonald KM, Francis GS, Matthews J, Hunter D and Cohn JN. Long-term oral nitrate therapy 
prevents chronic ventricular remodeling in the dog. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:514-22. 
85. 
Taylor AL, Ziesche S, Yancy C, Carson P, D'Agostino R, Jr., Ferdinand K, Taylor M, Adams K, 
Sabolinski M, Worcel M and Cohn JN. Combination of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine in blacks 
with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2049-57. 
86. 
Cohn JN, Tam SW, Anand IS, Taylor AL, Sabolinski ML and Worcel M. Isosorbide dinitrate and 
hydralazine in a fixed-dose combination produces further regression of left ventricular remodeling in 
a well-treated black population with heart failure: results from A-HeFT. J Card Fail. 2007;13:331-9. 
87. 
McNamara DM, Tam SW, Sabolinski ML, Tobelmann P, Janosko K, Venkitachalam L, Ofili E, 
Yancy C, Feldman AM, Ghali JK, Taylor AL, Cohn JN and Worcel M. Endothelial nitric oxide 
synthase (NOS3) polymorphisms in African Americans with heart failure: results from the A-HeFT 
trial. J Card Fail. 2009;15:191-8. 
88. 
Wolkart G, Beretta M, Wenzl MV, Stessel H, Schmidt K, Maeda N, Mayer B and Schrammel A. 
Tolerance to Nitroglycerin Through Proteasomal Downregulation of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-2 in 
a Genetic Mouse Model of Ascorbate Deficiency. British journal of pharmacology. 2012. 
89. 
Cole RT, Kalogeropoulos AP, Georgiopoulou VV, Gheorghiade M, Quyyumi A, Yancy C and Butler 
J. Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate in heart failure: historical perspective, mechanisms, and 
future directions. Circulation. 2011;123:2414-22. 
90. 
Dulce RA, Yiginer O, Gonzalez DR, Goss G, Feng N, Zheng M and Hare JM. Hydralazine and 
Organic Nitrates Restore Impaired Excitation-Contraction Coupling by Reducing Calcium Leak 
Associated with Nitroso-Redox Imbalance. J Biol Chem. 2013. 
91. 
Daiber A, Oelze M, Coldewey M, Kaiser K, Huth C, Schildknecht S, Bachschmid M, Nazirisadeh Y, 
Ullrich V, Mulsch A, Munzel T and Tsilimingas N. Hydralazine is a powerful inhibitor of peroxynitrite 
formation as a possible explanation for its beneficial effects on prognosis in patients with congestive 
heart failure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;338:1865-74. 
92. 
Hare JM. Nitroso-redox balance in the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2112-4. 
93. 
Munzel T, Kurz S, Rajagopalan S, Thoenes M, Berrington WR, Thompson JA, Freeman BA and 
Harrison DG. Hydralazine prevents nitroglycerin tolerance by inhibiting activation of a membrane-
bound NADH oxidase. A new action for an old drug. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:1465-70. 
94. 
Cohn JN, Archibald DG, Ziesche S, Franciosa JA, Harston WE, Tristani FE, Dunkman WB, Jacobs 
W, Francis GS, Flohr KH and et al. Effect of vasodilator therapy on mortality in chronic congestive 
heart failure. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med. 
1986;314:1547-52. 
95. 
Gogia H, Mehra A, Parikh S, Raman M, Ajit-Uppal J, Johnson JV and Elkayam U. Prevention of 
tolerance to hemodynamic effects of nitrates with concomitant use of hydralazine in patients with 
chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1575-80. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 43 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
96. 
Leite CM, Gomes MG, Vassallo DV and Mill JG. Changes in collagen content in the residual 
myocardium surviving after infarction in rats. Influence of propranolol or hydralazine therapy. Arch 
Med Res. 1995;26:79-84. 
97. 
Norton GR, Tsotetsi J, Trifunovic B, Hartford C, Candy GP and Woodiwiss AJ. Myocardial stiffness 
is attributed to alterations in cross-linked collagen rather than total collagen or phenotypes in 
spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 1997;96:1991-8. 
98. 
Rosin NL, Sopel M, Falkenham A, Myers TL and Legare JF. Myocardial migration by fibroblast 
progenitor cells is blood pressure dependent in a model of angII myocardial fibrosis. Hypertens 
Res. 2012;35:449-56. 
99. 
Dumont O, Pinaud F, Guihot AL, Baufreton C, Loufrani L and Henrion D. Alteration in flow (shear 
stress)-induced remodelling in rat resistance arteries with aging: improvement by a treatment with 
hydralazine. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;77:600-8. 
100. Vial JH and Boyd GW. Histometric assessment of renal arterioles during DOCA and post-DOCA 
hypertension and hydralazine treatment in rats. J Hypertens. 1989;7:203-9. 
101. Knowles HJ, Tian YM, Mole DR and Harris AL. Novel mechanism of action for hydralazine: 
induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor, and angiogenesis 
by inhibition of prolyl hydroxylases. Circ Res. 2004;95:162-9. 
102. Evers J, Bonn R, Boertz A, Cawello W, Dickmans HA and Weiss M. Pharmacokinetics of isosorbide 
dinitrate, isosorbide-2-nitrate and isosorbide-5-nitrate in renal insufficiency after repeated oral 
dosage. Klin Wochenschr. 1989;67:342-8. 
103. Evers J, Krakamp B, Klimkait W, Dickmans HA, Maddock J, Luckow V, Cawello W and Weiss M. 
Pharmacokinetics of isosorbide-5-nitrate in renal failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30:349-50. 
104. Bauer H, Laufen H and Franz HE. Isosorbide dinitrate in plasma and dialysate during 
haemodialysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30:187-90. 
105. Li H and Wang SX. Improvement of hypertension and LVH in maintenance hemodialysis patients 
treated with sustained-release isosorbide mononitrate. J Nephrol. 2011;24:236-45. 
106. Ludden TM, McNay JL, Jr., Shepherd AM and Lin MS. Clinical pharmacokinetics of hydralazine. 
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1982;7:185-205. 
107. Mako J and Potyondi M. Use of Tensiomin in hypertensive patients with impaired renal function. 
Ther Hung. 1992;40:20-4. 
108. Kungys G, Naujoks H and Wanner C. Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in hypertensive patients 
undergoing haemodialysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59:291-5. 
109. Yilmaz R, Altun B, Kahraman S, Ozer N, Akinci D and Turgan C. Impact of amlodipine or ramipril 
treatment on left ventricular mass and carotid intima-media thickness in nondiabetic hemodialysis 
patients. Ren Fail. 2010;32:903-12. 
110. Tepel M, Hopfenmueller W, Scholze A, Maier A and Zidek W. Effect of amlodipine on 
cardiovascular events in hypertensive haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 
2008;23:3605-12. 
111. Aslam S, Santha T, Leone A and Wilcox C. Effects of amlodipine and valsartan on oxidative stress 
and plasma methylarginines in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 
2006;70:2109-15. 
112. Kestenbaum B, Gillen DL, Sherrard DJ, Seliger S, Ball A and Stehman-Breen C. Calcium channel 
blocker use and mortality among patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2002;61:2157-
64. 
113. Olsen NT, Jons C, Fritz-Hansen T, Mogelvang R and Sogaard P. Pulsed-wave tissue Doppler and 
color tissue Doppler echocardiography: calibration with M-mode, agreement, and reproducibility in a 
clinical setting. Echocardiography. 2009;26:638-44. 
114. Shan K, Bick RJ, Poindexter BJ, Shimoni S, Letsou GV, Reardon MJ, Howell JF, Zoghbi WA and 
Nagueh SF. Relation of tissue Doppler derived myocardial velocities to myocardial structure and 
beta-adrenergic receptor density in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:891-6. 
115. Shimoni S, Frangogiannis NG, Aggeli CJ, Shan K, Quinones MA, Espada R, Letsou GV, Lawrie 
GM, Winters WL, Reardon MJ and Zoghbi WA. Microvascular structural correlates of myocardial 
contrast echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: 
implications for the assessment of myocardial hibernation. Circulation. 2002;106:950-6. 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 44 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
116. Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S, Niemann M, Frantz S, Lange V, Beer M, Gattenlohner S, 
Voelker W, Ertl G and Strotmann JM. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic 
severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:577-84. 
117. Reed AL, Tanaka A, Sorescu D, Liu H, Jeong EM, Sturdy M, Walp ER, Dudley SC and Sutliff RL. 
Diastolic dysfunction is associated with cardiac fibrosis in the senescence-accelerated mouse. Am 
J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011;301:H824–H831. 
118. Goland S, Siegel RJ, Burton K, De Robertis MA, Rafique A, Schwarz E, Zivari K, Mirocha J, Trento 
A and Czer LS. Changes in left and right ventricular function of donor hearts during the first year 
after heart transplantation. Heart. 2011;97:1681-6. 
119. Moreo A, Ambrosio G, De Chiara B, Pu M, Tran T, Mauri F and Raman SV. Influence of myocardial 
fibrosis on left ventricular diastolic function: noninvasive assessment by cardiac magnetic 
resonance and echo. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:437-43. 
120. Ho SJ, Feng AN, Lee LN, Chen JW and Lin SJ. Predictive value of predischarge spectral tissue 
doppler echocardiography and n-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients hospitalized with 
acute heart failure. Echocardiography. 2011;28:303-10. 
121. Park SJ, Lee SC, Jang SY, Chang SA, Choi JO, Park SW and Oh JK. E/e' ratio is a strong 
prognostic predictor of mortality in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with preserved left 
ventricular systolic function. Circ J. 2011;75:2350-6. 
122. Snopek G, Drewniak W, Borys M and Dabrowski M. Prognostic value of tissue Doppler 
echocardiographic imaging in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography. 
2011;28:298-302. 
123. Kimura H, Takeda K, Tsuruya K, Mukai H, Muto Y, Okuda H, Furusho M, Ueno T, Nakashita S, 
Miura S, Maeda A and Kondo H. Left ventricular mass index is an independent determinant of 
diastolic dysfunction in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a tissue Doppler imaging study. Nephron 
Clin Pract. 2011;117:c67-73. 
124. Vignon P, Allot V, Lesage J, Martaille JF, Aldigier JC, Francois B and Gastinne H. Diagnosis of left 
ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the setting of acute changes in loading conditions. Crit Care. 
2007;11:R43. 
125. Agmon Y, Oh JK, McCarthy JT, Khandheria BK, Bailey KR and Seward JB. Effect of volume 
reduction on mitral annular diastolic velocities in hemodialysis patients. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:665-
8, A11. 
126. Oguzhan A, Arinc H, Abaci A, Topsakal R, Kemal Eryol N, Ozdogru I, Basar E and Ergin A. Preload 
dependence of Doppler tissue imaging derived indexes of left ventricular diastolic function. 
Echocardiography. 2005;22:320-5. 
127. Jellis C, Martin J, Narula J and Marwick TH. Assessment of nonischemic myocardial fibrosis. J Am 
Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:89-97. 
128. Mottram PM, Haluska B, Leano R, Cowley D, Stowasser M and Marwick TH. Effect of aldosterone 
antagonism on myocardial dysfunction in hypertensive patients with diastolic heart failure. 
Circulation. 2004;110:558-65. 
129. Buus NH, Bottcher M, Hermansen F, Sander M, Nielsen TT and Mulvany MJ. Influence of nitric 
oxide synthase and adrenergic inhibition on adenosine-induced myocardial hyperemia. Circulation. 
2001;104:2305-10. 
130. Kaul S. The role of capillaries in determining coronary blood flow reserve: Implications for stress-
induced reversible perfusion defects. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001;8:694-700. 
131. Jayaweera AR, Wei K, Coggins M, Bin JP, Goodman C and Kaul S. Role of capillaries in 
determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Am J Physiol. 
1999;277:H2363-72. 
132. Tsagalou EP, Anastasiou-Nana M, Agapitos E, Gika A, Drakos SG, Terrovitis JV, Ntalianis A and 
Nanas JN. Depressed coronary flow reserve is associated with decreased myocardial capillary 
density in patients with heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 
2008;52:1391-8. 
133. Schubert S, Abdul-Khaliq H, Wellnhofer E, Hiemann NE, Ewert P, Lehmkuhl HB, Meyer R, Miera O, 
Peters B, Hetzer R and Berger F. Coronary flow reserve measurement detects transplant coronary 
artery disease in pediatric heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:514-21. 
134. Schindler TH, Nitzsche EU, Schelbert HR, Olschewski M, Sayre J, Mix M, Brink I, Zhang XL, Kreissl 
M, Magosaki N, Just H and Solzbach U. Positron emission tomography-measured abnormal 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 45 
Version 1.3 20180413 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Do not disclose or use except as authorized.  
responses of myocardial blood flow to sympathetic stimulation are associated with the risk of 
developing cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1505-12. 
135. Tio RA, Dabeshlim A, Siebelink HM, de Sutter J, Hillege HL, Zeebregts CJ, Dierckx RA, van 
Veldhuisen DJ, Zijlstra F and Slart RH. Comparison between the prognostic value of left ventricular 
function and myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Nucl Med. 
2009;50:214-9. 
136. Brilla CG, Funck RC and Rupp H. Lisinopril-mediated regression of myocardial fibrosis in patients 
with hypertensive heart disease. Circulation. 2000;102:1388-93. 
137. Neglia D, Fommei E, Varela-Carver A, Mancini M, Ghione S, Lombardi M, Pisani P, Parker H, 
D'Amati G, Donato L and Camici PG. Perindopril and indapamide reverse coronary microvascular 
remodelling and improve flow in arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2011;29:364-72. 
138. Charytan DM, Shelbert HR and Di Carli MF. Coronary microvascular function in early chronic 
kidney disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:663-71. 
139. Gorgulu N, Yelken B, Caliskan Y, Elitok A, Cimen AO, Yazici H, Oflaz H, Golcuk E, Ekmekci A, 
Turkmen A, Yildiz A and Sever MS. Endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis patients with failed 
renal transplants. Clin Transplant. 2010;24:678-84. 
140. Toyama T, Sato C, Koyama K, Kasama S, Murakami J, Yamashita E, Kawaguchi R, Adachi H, 
Hoshizaki H and Oshima S. Olmesartan improves coronary flow reserve of hypertensive patients 
using coronary magnetic resonance imaging compared with amlodipine. Cardiology. 2012;122:230-
6. 
141. Higuchi T, Abletshauser C, Nekolla SG, Schwaiger M and Bengel FM. Effect of the angiotensin 
receptor blocker Valsartan on coronary microvascular flow reserve in moderately hypertensive 
patients with stable coronary artery disease. Microcirculation. 2007;14:805-12. 
142. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, Gaber M, Dorbala S, Charytan DM, Blankstein R and Di 
Carli MF. Coronary vascular dysfunction and prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. 
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1025-34. 
143. Alexanderson E, Garcia-Rojas L, Jimenez M, Jacome R, Calleja R, Martinez A, Ochoa JM, Meave 
A and Alexanderson G. Effect of ezetimibe-simvastatine over endothelial dysfunction in 
dyslipidemic patients: assessment by 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 
2010;17:1015-22. 
144. Edwards NC, Ferro CJ, Kirkwood H, Chue CD, Young AA, Stewart PM, Steeds RP and Townend 
JN. Effect of spironolactone on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with early 
stage chronic kidney disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:1505-11. 
145. Hayashi SY, Rohani M, Lindholm B, Brodin LA, Lind B, Barany P, Alvestrand A and Seeberger A. 
Left ventricular function in patients with chronic kidney disease evaluated by colour tissue Doppler 
velocity imaging. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:125-32. 
146. Mendes L, Ribeiras R, Adragao T, Lima S, Horta E, Reis C, Amaral T, Aguiar C, Gouveia R and 
Silva A. Load-independent parameters of diastolic and systolic function by speckle tracking and 
tissue doppler in hemodialysis patients. Rev Port Cardiol. 2008;27:1011-25. 
147. Lerman A, Burnett JC, Jr., Higano ST, McKinley LJ and Holmes DR, Jr. Long-term L-arginine 
supplementation improves small-vessel coronary endothelial function in humans. Circulation. 
1998;97:2123-8. 
148. Joffe HV, Kwong RY, Gerhard-Herman MD, Rice C, Feldman K and Adler GK. Beneficial effects of 
eplerenone versus hydrochlorothiazide on coronary circulatory function in patients with diabetes 
mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2552-8. 
149. Armijo-Olivo S, Warren S and Magee D. Intention to treat analysis, compliance, drop-outs and how 
to deal with missing data in clinical research: a review. Phyical Therapy Reviews. 2009;14:36-49. 
 

HIDE Trial Protocol 
 
Page 46 
Version 1.1 20170620 
 
15 Visit & Procedure Schedule  
Visit # 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
Event/Procedure 
Pre-
screen 
Screen 
Baselin
e/Rand 
Wk 1 
Wk 2 
Wk 3 
Wk 4 
Wk 8 
Wk 12 
Wk 16 
Wk 20 
Wk 24 
Wk 26 
Wk 30 
 
 
In-
person 
visit 
In-
person 
visit 
(within  4 
wks)  
Phone/ 
in-person  
contact 
(day 6-8) 
 
In- 
person 
visit 
Phone/ 
in-
person 
contact 
In- 
person 
visit 
Phone/ 
in-
person 
contact 
Phone/ 
in-
person 
contact 
In- 
person 
visit 
 
Phone/ 
in-
person 
contact 
Phone/ 
in-
person 
contact 
In- 
person 
visit  
(+/- 2 
wks) 
Phone/ 
in-
person 
contact 
Eligibility Criteria 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Informed Consent 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Serum Pregnancy1 
 
X 
X rpt 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Randomization 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical History 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Concomitant Meds 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Vital signs & edema 
assessment 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Physical exam 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Central Labs [Chem 
panel 10, CBC] 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Serum/Plasma for  
Long-Term Storage 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Review of Dialysis 
Unit Labs and 
Records2 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Drug Distribution 
 
 
1 wk  
supply 
1 wk  
supply 
2 wk 
supply 
prn 
12 wk 
supply 
 
 
10 wk 
supply 
 
 
 
 
Dose Escalation 
 
 
 
+ 
+ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Drug Reconciliation 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Adverse Events 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Dose Assessment 
[prn] 
 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
PET Scan  
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
TDI-Echo Scan 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
1Women of child-bearing age only 
2Dialysis unit laboratories and records include intravenous medications, KT/V, PTH, CBC, chemistries, iron studies, and dialysis run sheet blood 
pressures, and dialysis prescriptions