Phase II Study of Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Natural Killer Cells in Conjunction With Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide and High Dose Melphalan Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With Multiple Myeloma
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Plasma Cell Leukemia, Plasma Cell Myeloma
Sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MD Anderson IND Sponsor Cover Sheet 
 
Protocol ID 
2011-0379 
Protocol Title 
Phase II study of umbilical cord blood-derived natural killer cells 
in conjunction with elotuzumab, lenalidomide and high dose 
melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant for 
patients with multiple myeloma 
Protocol Phase  
Phase II 
Protocol Version Version 26.0 
Version Date 
19 February 2020 
 
Protocol PI 
Samer Srour, MD 
Department 
Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy 
 
IND Sponsor 
MD Anderson Cancer Center 
IND # 
15272 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 1 of 37 
 
 
 
Phase II study of umbilical cord blood-derived natural killer cells in 
conjunction with elotuzumab, lenalidomide and high dose melphalan 
followed by autologous stem cell transplant for  
patients with multiple myeloma 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Department 
2 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Biostatistics Department 
Institution Study Number:  2011-0379 
Sponsor Number:   RV-MM-PI-0691  
Financial Support:   Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb  
IND Sponsor:  The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center  
 
IND Number:  15272 
Principal Investigator:  Samer Srour, MD 
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center  
Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Department 
1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0432 
Houston, TX 77030 
Telephone: 713-794-4354 
Fax: 713-794-4902 
ssour@mdanderson.org 
Collaborators:  Qaiser Bashir, MD1 
Roland L. Bassett, Jr.2 
Chitra M. Hosing, MD1 
Partow Kebriaei, MD1 
Yago Nieto, MD, PhD1 
Uday R. Popat, MD1 
Muzaffar H. Qazilbash, MD1 
Katy Rezvani, MD, PhD1 
Elizabeth Shpall, MD1 
 
   

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 2 of 37 
 
 
Table of Contents 
 
 
1.0 
OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 
2.0 
BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................... 3 
2.1 
UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD-DERIVED NATURAL KILLER CELLS FOR MULTIPLE MYELOMA.................................................................. 3 
2.2 
MULTIPLE MYELOMA ................................................................................................................................................... 9 
2.3 
LENALIDOMIDE AND MULTIPLE MYELOMA ..................................................................................................................... 10 
2.4 
RATIONALE .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 
2.5 
CORRELATIVE STUDIES BACKGROUND- QUANTIFICATION OF DONOR NK CELLS IN RECIPIENT .................................................... 10 
3.0 
BACKGROUND DRUG INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ 11 
3.1 
MELPHALAN............................................................................................................................................................. 11 
3.2 
FILGRASTIM-SNDZ (G-CSF, ZARXIO) ............................................................................................................................. 11 
3.3 
LENALIDOMIDE ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 
3.4   
ELOTUZUMAB ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 
4.0 
PATIENT ELIGIBILITY .......................................................................................................................................... 17 
5.0 
TREATMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................................................. 18 
6.0 
PRETREATMENT EVALUATION .......................................................................................................................... 22 
7.0  
EVALUATION DURING STUDY ............................................................................................................................ 22 
8.0 
STUDY DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 23 
9.0 
EVALUATION OF ADVERSE EVENTS ................................................................................................................... 24 
10.0 
STATISTICAL DESIGN ......................................................................................................................................... 28 
10.1 
STUDY DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 
10.2 
EFFICACY ................................................................................................................................................................. 31 
10.3 
ANALYSIS PLAN ......................................................................................................................................................... 32 
10.4 
SAMPLE SIZE/ACCRUAL RATE ...................................................................................................................................... 32 
10.5 
ANALYSIS OF SECONDARY ENDPOINTS ........................................................................................................................... 32 
11.0  
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 32 
12.0  
CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM THE STUDY ...................................................................................................... 34 
13.0  
REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................... 35 
 
  
 
 
 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 3 of 37 
 
 
Protocol Body 
 
1.0 Objectives 
Primary Objectives 
 
This study has three primary objectives: 
 
1. To find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of umbilical cord blood (UCB)-derived 
NK cells. 
2. To determine efficacy by the percent of patients achieving VGPR + CR at 3 
months post-transplant. 
3. To assess the minimal residual disease rate 100 days post-transplant in high-risk 
patients. High risk will be defined as patients with any of the following: 
a. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showing t(4:14), t(14:16), t(14:20), gain 
(amp) 1q; deletion (Del) 17/17p [or tp53 gene mutation/deletion by next 
generation sequencing (NGS), or by conventional cytogenetics] 
b. Deletion 13 by conventional cytogenetic analysis 
c. 
High risk signatures as determined by the GEP-70 or EMC-92 gene 
expression profiles 
d. Relapsed disease within 18 months of prior ASCT 
Secondary Objective 
 
1. To quantify duration of infused allogeneic donor UCB-derived NK cells in the 
recipient. 
2.0 Background 
 
2.1 
Umbilical cord blood-derived natural killer cells for multiple myeloma 
 
2.1.1 
Natural killer cells 
 
Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes that play a unique role in 
innate and anti-tumor immunity. They usually express the surface markers CD16 
and CD56 and exert their cytotoxic effects via the release of cytoplasmic 
granules containing perforin and granzyme. NK cells can be activated by 
cytokines, antibodies (via Fc receptors) or a shift in the balance between their 
activating and inhibitory receptors, particularly in response to interaction with 
class I alleles. 
 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 4 of 37 
 
 
Alloreactive NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against leukemia cells has been 
demonstrated in vitro [1] and in murine models 
[2]. In addition, NK cells have the 
potential to inhibit host dendritic cell activity, thereby decreasing the risk of GvHD 
[3]. Of note, the cytotoxicity of NK cells can be augmented by administration of IL-
2[4-6]. 
 
2.1.2 
Inducing NK cell reactivity 
 
NK cells recognize cells lacking MHC class I molecules and exert cytotoxic 
effects on these cells, the “missing self” hypothesis 
[7]. This is thought to occur 
via the inhibitory “killer cell Ig-like receptors” (KIRs), which inhibit cytotoxicity 
upon interacting with a self MHC class I molecule. In this way NK cells can be a 
valuable weapon against tumor cells, which often down-regulate MHC class I to 
avoid recognition by the immune system. 
 
This interaction between the KIR and class I alleles is crucial for anti-tumor 
immunity. Normally, the (class I) HLA- C1, C2, Bw4 and Bw6 alleles interact only 
with specific KIR proteins. The NK repertoire therefore may vary from individual 
to individual and will depend on the HLA phenotype and on the KIR haplotype 
gene composition. It is generally accepted that, in order to avoid auto-reactivity, 
the NK repertoire is developed when both the inhibitory receptor and its specific 
HLA ligand are present and expressed in the same individual. Therefore, in an 
allogeneic transplantation setting in which the donor and recipient are 
mismatched in the alleles of HLA-B or in HLA-C, the NK cells from the donor may 
not be inhibited by the target cells of the recipient, which lack the appropriate 
HLA alleles that would normally interact with the KIR receptors. Some of the 
donor KIR’s are therefore left without a corresponding ligand (the “missing ligand” 
hypothesis). This incompatibility (also known as alloreactivity) releases the NK 
cell from inhibitory KIR signaling and thus promotes cytotoxicity. 
 
Clinically, NK cells have shown promise in exerting anti-tumor effects. In a study 
by Ruggeri et al of AML patients treated with haploidentical stem cell transplants, 
NK cell alloreactivity was associated with a lower risk of relapse and protection 
against GVHD [2]. In that study the probability of event-free survival at 5 years 
was 60 % in the patients who had received alloreactive NK cells versus 5% in the 
patients who had received non–alloreactive NK cells. In addition, a multivariate 
analysis showed that KIR ligand incompatibility was the only independent 
predictor of survival in the patients with AML. Finally, 0% of AML patients who 
received alloreactive NK cells demonstrated > grade II GVHD, versus 14% of the 
patients who did not receive alloreactive NK cells. In another study, patients who 
underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant for AML, CML and ALL with an HLA-
mismatched graft had a decreased hazard ration of relapse (HR, 0.61, P< 0.004) 
if there was a missing a KIR ligand versus no missing ligand
[8]. 
There have been several prospective studies with NK cell therapy in hematologic 
malignancies. In one study, 19 poor-prognosis AML patients were treated with 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 5 of 37 
 
 
cyclophosphamide and fludarabine and subsequently received haploidentical 
peripheral blood NK cells.
[9] In this study 5 of the 19 patients achieved a CR and 
there was no significant GVHD. Here at MDACC there is an ongoing phase I 
study to explore the safety of peripheral blood-derived NK (PBNK) cells in 
patents with AML/MDS (IRB #2005-0508, IND #12,802). Thus far we have 
treated 13 patients with doses of 1e6 to 3 e7 total nucleated cells/kg (containing  
0.014 to 8.24 e6 CD56+ cells/kg). These PBNK cells have been generated by 
collection from a sibling, culture with interleukin-2 (for 16 hours) and subsequent 
CD3-depletion in a manner similar to our culture conditions described in Section 
5.2. To date, there have not been any infusional toxicities or other adverse 
effects. 
 
Finally, the myeloma group at University of Arkansas has published a trial of 
haploidentical peripheral blood NK cells infused as part of an autologous 
transplant for relapsed multiple myeloma.
[10] In this study, 10 patients were 
treated with fludarabine and melphalan and then received the haploidentical NK 
infusion. There was subsequently a delay of 14 days before the patients 
received their autologous stem cell graft for hematopoietic reconstitution. The 
NK cell dose ranged from 2.7 e6 cells/kg to 92.0 e6 cells/kg. Importantly, there 
were no episodes of GVHD or autograft rejection and none of the patients died 
within the first 100 days. This suggests that allogeneic NK cells can be infused 
safely without interfering with autologous hematopoetic reconstitution. 
 
2.1.3 
NK cells are cytotoxic to multiple myeloma cells 
 
There is mounting evidence to support the cytotoxic potential of NK cells in 
multiple myeloma. In one study, IL-2 stimulated NK cells demonstrated 
significant in vitro cytotoxicity against multiple myeloma cell lines. These same 
NK cells, when adoptively transferred to a murine model of multiple myeloma 
were able to increase survival of the mice in a dose-dependent manner 
[11]. 
Interestingly, there is evidence to suggest that the newer, more effective 
pharmacotherapies in multiple myeloma may enhance the effect of NK cells. 
Thalidomide is thought to increase NK cell activity in multiple myeloma 
[12] and 
lenalidomide may also promote NK cell mediated apoptosis
[13]. The proteosome 
inhibitor bortezomib may down-regulate expression of MHC class I on multiple 
myeloma cells, making them more susceptible to NK-induced lysis 
[14]. In 
addition, bortezomib has been shown to decrease DC activity in vitro 
[15]; thus 
bortezomib and NK cells could work synergistically to prevent GVHD in an allo-
transplant setting. 
 
2.1.4 
Endogenous NK cells are ineffective against multiple myeloma 
 
Unfortunately, the cytotoxic activity of NK cells in patients with advanced MM 
may actually be reduced 
[16]. Down-regulation of several key cell-surface proteins, 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 6 of 37 
 
 
including CD16 and 2B4/CD244 have been implicated in this process 
[17]. These 
patients may thus be prone to disease progression and are possible candidates 
for an alternative NK cell source. Moreover, the data from the leukemia 
experience suggests that allogeneic source of NK cells would be the best 
weapon against MM. 
 
2.1.5 
Umbilical cord blood as a source of NK cells 
 
Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is known to be a valuable reservoir for stem cells. 
UCB grafts have been used with marked success in the pediatric setting and are 
now increasingly being used for adult stem cell transplant (SCT). The UCB 
provides a unique source of stem cells: the cells have the potential to repopulate 
the hematopoetic system but have proportionately more naïve T cells, reducing 
the risk for GVHD. This allows for more flexibility in graft selection, as there can 
be a greater degree of mismatch between the donor and recipient. However, the 
advantages in GVHD are countered by the limitations of lower cell dose and 
delayed time to engraftment. These challenges have been addressed by using 
double (versus single) cord grafts and more diligent peri-transplant evaluation 
and prophylaxis against known common pathogens. 
 
Multicenter clinical trials with UCB transplant have shown it to be as effective as 
transplant with unrelated or HLA-mismatched marrow for hematologic 
malignancies. 
[18,19] The rates of acute GVHD appear to be lower with UCB in 
these trials. Single-institution trials have demonstrated and advantage of UCB 
over marrow transplants 
[20]. In addition the use of double cords appears to 
confer a significantly decreased risk of relapse compared with single cord 
transplants, suggesting that double cord transplants may be comparable, if not 
superior, to marrow transplants 
[21]. 
 
As a source for NK cells UCB also has great promise. Purification, expansion 
and stimulation of NK cells from an UCB graft can yield a potent anti-tumor 
therapeutic. In addition, this fraction of the UCB unit will have lesser potential for 
GVHD (versus NK cells derived from donor peripheral blood) since any 
contaminating T cells would more likely have a naïve phenotype. Though the 
baseline percentage of CD16+/CD56+ NK cells is lower than that in peripheral 
blood grafts, this phenotype can be induced by stimulation with cytokines such as 
IL-2 
[22]. 
 
 
 
 
 
In our lab, culturing cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMC’s) with artificial antigen 
presenting feeder cells (APC’s) and IL-2 has yielded a >600 fold expansion of NK 
cells from frozen UCB units and a >2000-fold expansion of NK cells from fresh 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 7 of 37 
 
 
UCB units (Figure 1). 
 
 
 
 
In addition, expanded NK cells demonstrate a functional phenotype. The 
cytotoxicity of the UCB-derived NK cells against K562 (a classic NK cell target) is 
comparable to that of peripheral blood-derived NK cells (Figure 2). Furthermore, 
these UCB-derived NK cells also secrete IFN-ã and express the normal 
repertoire of killer cell Ig-like receptors (KIR’s) and activating NK cytotoxic 
receptors (NCR’s) (data not shown). 
 
 
 
 
 
In addition, we have preliminary data to show that ex vivo expanded UCB NK 
cells are cytotoxic to and synapse with multiple myeloma cells lines (Figures 3 
and 4). In addition, these UCB-NK cells were also active against primary, bone 
marrow-derived CD138+ plasma cells from myeloma patients, an effect which 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 8 of 37 
 
 
was augmented by pre-incubation of UCB-NK cells with lenalidomide (Figure 5) 
 
 
 
 
 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 9 of 37 
 
 
 
 
 
Peripheral blood-derived allogeneic NK cells are eliminated by the normal 
physiological process of cell death. Based on preliminary data from our 
institution and others
[9,10] we know that peripheral blood-derived NK cells are 
well-tolerated between doses of greater than 1 e6 cells/kg up to 92 e6 cells/kg. 
Thus our dose levels are between 5 e6 cells/kg and 1 e8 cells/kg, intravenously, 
as outlined in the schema above. 
 
2.2 Multiple Myeloma 
 
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of 
plasma cells. It accounts for 10% of all hematologic malignancies and has a 5 
year survival rate of 34% 
[23]. The disease has numerous systemic 
consequences, including hypercalcemia, renal failure, cytopenias and skeletal 
lesions. Though there are numerous treatment modalities, including several 
novel agents as well as stem cell transplant, the disease is still considered 
incurable. 
 
Based on a large, phase III study, high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem 
cell rescue is now part of the standard of care for patients under 65 with multiple 
myeloma. This method of consolidation has yielded a 1year overall survival 
benefit for patients. However there is still a significant recurrence rate after 
transplant, with a median PFS of only 31.6 months 
[24]. Efforts to decrease 
recurrence have focused on newer induction and pre-transplant therapies, 
 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 10 of 37 
 
 
post-transplant maintenance and the possibility of a second transplants with an 
allograft. 
 
The idea of allogeneic stem cell transplant is appealing because it provides the 
opportunity for a graft versus myeloma (GVM) effect. However this benefit may 
be countered by the deleterious effects of graft versus host disease (GVHD). 
One way to avoid this adverse effect may be to use donor lymphocytes which are 
tumor-reactive but with lower GVHD potential, such as NK cells.  Therefore we 
are proposing the use of UCB-NK cells as part of the preparative regimen for 
patients undergoing an AUTOlogous stem cell transplant to treat relapsed or 
refractory disease. This strategy may provide the critical cellular alloreactivity 
necessary to eradicate the primary disease while limiting the potential for GVHD. 
 
2.3 Lenalidomide and Multiple Myeloma 
 
Lenalidomide has been established as a potent anti-myeloma agent for either 
up-front or salvage therapy
.[25-27] Our department has recently completed the 
phase I portion of a study of high dose lenalidomide in combination with high 
dose melphalan and autologous SCT (protocol 2008-0661, PI: Qazilbash). Thus 
far, in this trial, there have been no dose-limiting toxicities at the highest planned 
dose level (100 mg PO x 7 days). In 11 evaluable patients, there have been no 
delays in engraftment or additional thromboembolic events. Therefore, 
lenalidomide appears to be safe in the setting of myeloablative chemotherapy 
and autologous stem cell transplant. 
 
2.4 Rationale 
 
In summary, NK cells appear to be active against hematologic malignancies, 
including multiple myeloma, and this activity is dependent on alloreactivity 
between the NK cell and the target tumor cell. Umbilical cord blood can now be 
expanded and enriched for the population of NK cells which still demonstrate 
cytotoxicity and theoretically carry lesser risk of GVHD. These NK cells are 
cytotoxic to primary myeloma cells and their activity may be further enhanced 
with lenalidomide. Finally, lenalidomide appears to be safe and well-tolerated in 
the setting of high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue. 
Therefore we are proposing the use of UCB-derived NK cells as a potent 
anti-myeloma therapeutic in the setting of lenalidomide and melphalan 
chemotherapy and autologous transplant for multiple myeloma. 
 
2.5 Correlative Studies Background- Quantification of donor NK cells in 
recipient 
 
In an allogeneic NK cell study from another institution patients’ (recipients’) blood 
was analyzed for the presence these donor NK cells
[9]. Polymerase chain 
reaction (PCR) technology was employed, using known primers against donor 
Class I HLA genes. This method can be used to determine the duration of 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 11 of 37 
 
 
persistence of the donor NK cells in the patient. A similar analysis has been  
performed in our department in the setting of double UCB SCT to identify per 
cent contributions of each cord to recipient hematopoiesis. 
[28] 
 
 
3.0 Background Drug Information 
 
3.1 Melphalan 
THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION: Antineoplastic alkylating agent 
 
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Interferes with DNA replication and transcription of 
RNA and ultimately results in the disruption of nucleic acid function. 
 
STORAGE AND STABILITY: Reconstituted solution retains 90% potency for 
about 3 hours at 30°C. Storage at 5°C results in precipitation. Intact packages 
can be stored at room temperature. 
 
ADMINISTRATION: Supplied as 50 mg vials and should be reconstituted in 10 
ml of diluent. Infuse over 30 minutes (complete administration within 60 minutes 
of reconstitution). Dilute with NS to a maximum concentration of 1.5 mg/ml. 
 
KNOWN ADVERSE EFFECTS : 
High-dose melphalan is well tolerated by patients when they are supported with 
blood component transfusions, PBSC transplantation and broad-spectrum 
antibiotics. The duration of profound bone marrow suppression decreases with 
the use of PBSC transplantation and colony stimulating factors. Gastrointestinal 
toxicity, which includes potentially severe stomatitis, esophagitis and severe 
diarrhea, can become the dose-limiting toxicity in these patients. The majority of 
patients receiving high-dose melphalan will require parenteral narcotics for 
mucositis related pain, IV hydration and potentially IV alimentation and broad 
spectrum IV antibiotics. Despite moderate to severe symptoms in many patients, 
recovery is the norm, coincident with recovery of granulocytes. Other toxicities 
reported include pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial pneumonitis, skin 
hypersensitivity, vasculitis, alopecia, hemolytic anemia, and allergic reaction. 
Melphalan may cause sterility, and/or disruption of menstruation in females. 
Melphalan may cause mouth sores, skin rash, and/or hair loss. It may cause 
injury to the kidneys, lungs, heart, and/or liver. It may cause allergic reactions, 
including itching, hives, flushing, wheezing, chest tightness, fever, chills, muscle 
stiffening, breathing problems, and/or loss of appetite. It may cause heart failure, 
bleeding from the bladder, and/or seizures. It may increase risk of developing a 
second cancer. 
 
SUPPLY: Commercially available. 
 
 
3.2 Filgrastim-sndz (G-CSF, Zarxio) 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 12 of 37 
 
 
 
THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION: Recombinant growth factor 
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Filgrastim, filgrastim-sndz, and tbo-filgrastim are 
granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) produced by recombinant 
DNA technology. G-CSFs stimulate the production, maturation, and 
activation of neutrophils to increase both their migration and cytotoxicity. 
 
STORAGE AND STABILITY: Filgrastim should be stored at 2° to 8°C. Prior to 
injection, Filgrastim may be allowed to reach room temperature; however, any 
vials left at room temperature for greater than 24 hours should be discarded. 
Vials should not be shaken. Vials should be inspected for sedimentation or 
discoloration prior to administration. If sedimentation or discoloration is observed, 
the vials should not be used. Commercially available in single-dose, 
preservative-free vials containing 300 
mcg (1 mL) and 480 mcg (1.6 mL) and prefilled syringes containing 300 mcg (0.5 
ml) and 480 mcg (0.8 ml) of Filgrastim. 
 
KNOWN ADVERSE EFFECTS: Mild to moderate bone pain, general skin rash, 
alopecia, fevers, thrombocytopenia, osteoporosis, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, 
mucositis, anorexia, inflammation of the blood vessels, and/or cardiac 
dysrhythmia can occur. Splenomegaly may result at high doses of Filgrastim. 
Filgrastim may cause irritation, bruising, and/or bleeding at the site of injection. It 
may cause chest pain. It may cause constipation, swelling of the mucous 
membranes, and/or irregular heartbeat. It may also cause joint pain in the hips 
and/or lower back. Filgrastim may cause bone pain, headache, fever, and/or leg 
cramps. It may also cause a flare-up of previous skin conditions such as 
psoriasis. It may cause rash, itching, swelling in the face and/or ankles, 
wheezing, shortness of breath, low blood pressure, and/or irregular heartbeat. 
Enlargement and rupture of the spleen and/or loss of hair may occur. Filgrastim 
may decrease the number of blood platelets, which can result in easy bruising or 
bleeding for a longer time and may also cause an increase in white blood cells. 
Filgrastim may also cause inflammation, swelling, redness, and irritation of the 
liver and/or low blood flow to the colon, stomach, and/or intestine. Filgrastim may 
cause the white blood cell count to be very high, which will be monitored 
Filgrastim may also speed up the growth of tumors or cancers. 
 
SUPPLY: Commercially available. 
 
3.3 Lenalidomide 
Common trade named 
Revlimid® 
 
Class 
Angiogenesis inhibitor 
immunomodulating agents (IMiDs). 
Antineoplastic agent 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 13 of 37 
 
 
Tumor Necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agent  
Dosage, adult (usual) 
Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The recommended starting dose is 10 mg daily 
orally. Dosing is continued or modified based upon clinical and laboratory findings. 
Myeloma: 25 mg once daily orally for 21 out of 28 days 
 
Administration 
Lenalidomide capsule are administrated orally with water. Patients should not 
break, chew or open the capsules 
 
Monitoring 
Platelet count, hemoglobin, WBC, and differential at start of therapy and prior to 
each subsequent course of therapy; serum creatinine, liver function tests, thyroid 
function tests; monitor for signs and symptoms of thromboembolism 
Women of childbearing age must have a pregnancy test within 10-14 days and 
24 hours before lenalidomide, then 4 weeks after therapy discontinued. 
 
Pregnancy Testing 
Pregnancy tests for females of childbearing potential. A female of childbearing 
potential (FCBP) is a sexually mature female who: 1) has not undergone a 
hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally 
postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any 
time in the preceding 24 consecutive months). 
 
For FCBP, pregnancy tests must occur within 10 - 14 days and again within 24 
hours prior to prescribing lenalidomide. (prescriptions must be filled within 7 
days) and at Day +30 (+/- 2days) post the last dose (D-2) of lenalidomide. (see 
Appendix C.: Risks of Fetal Exposure, Pregnancy Testing Guidelines and 
Acceptable Birth Control Methods). 
 
Indications 
- FDA labeled indications 
- Low- or Intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with 
a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional 
cytogenetic abnormalities. 
-Multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the 
treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior 
therapy. 
- Non FDA labeled indications 
- Metastatic malignant melanoma (investigational use): 10-25 mg once daily 
- Myelofibrosis (investigational use): 5-10 mg once daily 
 
Contraindications 
- Hypersensitivity of lenalidomide products 
- Previous resistance to the drug 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 14 of 37 
 
 
- Pregnancy 
Precautions 
- No formal studies have been conducted in patients with renal impairment. this 
drug is known to be excreted by the kidney, and the risk of adverse reactions to 
this drug may be greater in patients with impaired renal function. 
- Patients with Hepatic Disease: The pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in patients 
 
with hepatic impairment have not been studied. 
- Age: lenalidomide has been used in multiple myeloma (MM) clinical trials in 
patients up to 86 years of age. 
- Check pregnancy test before administering lenalidomide 
- Check CBC before administering lenalidomide 
- Hypersensitivity reaction; do not re challenge 
- Impairment of fertility 
- Mutagenic, potentially 
- Severe bone marrow depression 
- Women of childbearing age should avoid becoming pregnant 
- monitor for signs and symptoms of thromboembolism: prophylaxis 
 
 
   Adverse effects 
>10%: 
- Cardiovascular: Peripheral edema (8% to 21%) - Central nervous system: 
Fatigue (31% to 38%), pyrexia (21% to 23%), dizziness (20% to 21%), headache 
(20%) 
- Dermatologic: Pruritus (42%), rash (16% to 36%), dry skin (14%) 
- Endocrine & metabolic: Hyperglycemia (15%), hypokalemia (11%) 
- Gastrointestinal: Diarrhea 
(29% to 49%), constipation (24% to 39%), nausea (22% to 24%), weight loss 
(18%), dyspepsia (14%), anorexia (10% to 14%), taste perversion (6% to 13%), 
abdominal pain (8% to 12%) 
- Genitourinary: Urinary tract infection (11%) 
- Hematologic: Thrombocytopenia (17% to 62%; grades 3/4:10% to 50%), 
neutropenia (28% to 59%; grades 3/4: 21% to 53%), anemia (12% to 24%: 
grades 3/4: 6% to 9%); myelosuppression is dose-dependent and reversible with 
treatment interruption and/or dose reduction 
- Neuromuscular & skeletal: Muscle cramp (18% to 30%), arthralgia (10% to 
22%), back pain (15% to 21%), tremor (20%), weakness (15%), paresthesia 
(12%), limb pain (11%) 
- Ocular: Blurred vision (15%) 
- Respiratory: Nasopharyngitis (23%), cough (20%), dyspnea (7% to 20%), 
pharyngitis (16%), epistaxis (15%), upper respiratory infection (14% to 15%), 
pneumonia (11% to 12%) 
 
Pregnancy category - X 
- Breast feeding 
- Infant risk cannot be ruled out 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 15 of 37 
 
 
- How supplied 
- 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg and 25 mg capsules  
SUPPLY: Celgene Corporation/Bristol-Myers Squibb. 
3.4   Elotuzumab 
INDICATION 
Elotuzumab is indicated in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for 
the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received one to three 
prior therapies. 
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION 
10 mg/kg administered intravenously (IV). 
Premedicate with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, ranitidine and 
acetaminophen. 
DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS 
For Injection: 300 mg or 400 mg lyophilized powder in a single-dose vial for 
reconstitution 
CONTRAINDICATIONS 
None 
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS 
Infusion reactions: Premedication is required. Interrupt EMPLICITI (elotuzumab) 
for Grade 2 or higher and permanently discontinue for severe infusion reaction. 
Infections: Monitor for fever and other signs of infection and treat promptly. 
Second Primary Malignancies (SPM): Higher incidences of SPM were observed 
in a controlled clinical trial of patients with multiple myeloma receiving 
Elotuzumab. 
Hepatotoxicity: Monitor liver function and stop Elotuzumab if hepatotoxicity is 
suspected. 
Interference with determination of complete response: Elotuzumab can interfere 
with assays used to monitor M-protein. This interference can impact the 
determination of complete response. 
ADVERSE REACTIONS 
Most common adverse reactions include fatigue, diarrhea, pyrexia, constipation, 
cough, peripheral neuropathy, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, 
decreased appetite, pneumonia, low red and white blood cell counts. 
 
> 20% 
- General disorders: Tiredness; fever; swelling. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 16 of 37 
 
 
- Gastrointestinal: Diarrhea; constipation; nausea. 
- Blood disorders: Low red and white blood cells counts. 
 
Less likely (occurring in between 3% and 20% of patients) 
- General Disorders: Allergic type infusion reactions that may occur during 
or after elotuzumab administration and include symptoms such as chills, 
fever, nausea, rash, flushing, chest discomfort, increased sweating, high 
blood pressure, abdominal pain, swelling around the eyes or muscle 
spasms. 
- Gastrointestinal disorders: Vomiting; mouth sores or pain; upset stomach or 
heartburn. 
- Musculoskeletal disorders: General weakness; back pain, bone, joint, or 
muscle pain; muscle aches or weakness; chest pain. 
- Nervous system disorder: Pain, numbness or tingling in the hand, legs, or 
feet; headache; dizziness; difficulty sleeping; tremor; taste changes. 
- Respiratory disorders: Cough; shortness of breath; voice changes; nose bleeds; 
hiccups. 
- Metabolism and nutrition disorders: Poor appetite; increased blood 
sugar; change in blood electrolytes (salts or minerals). 
- Investigations: Decreased weight; change in liver or kidney function blood tests. 
- Infections: Infection of the throat, mouth, lung, sinus, blood, kidney, 
bladder, skin, stomach, or intestine. 
- Blood disorders: Low platelets. 
- Skin disorders: Itching or hives. 
- Psychiatric disorders: Anxiety; depression. 
- Vascular disorders: Low blood pressure. 
- Eye disorders: Blurred or reduced vision. 
 
- Infrequent (occurring in 1- 3% of patients or serious side effects in at least 
1 patient) 
- General disorders: Abnormal walking or falling; irritability or agitation; 
deterioration of health; sudden death. 
- Psychiatric disorders: Mood changes; confusion. 
- Eye disorders: Dry eyes; cataract; pink eye. 
 
Infrequent (occurring in 1- 3% of patients or serious side effects in at least 1 
patient) 
- General disorders: Abnormal walking or falling; irritability or agitation; 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 17 of 37 
 
 
deterioration of health; sudden death. 
- Psychiatric disorders: Mood changes; confusion. 
- Eye disorders: Cataract; pink eye. 
- Skin disorders: Dry mouth or skin; skin inflammation; hair loss. 
- Gastrointestinal disorders: Toothache; gas or bloating; difficulty swallowing; 
hemorrhoids; inflammation of the liver or colon. 
- Musculoskeletal disorders: Neck or jaw pain; joint or muscle stiffness. 
- Nervous system disorders: Sleepiness; difficulty remembering; fainting. 
- Respiratory tract disorders: Runny or stuffy nose; sinus congestion; wheezing; 
fluid in the lungs; inflammation of the lung. 
- Infejctions: Viral infections such as herpes virus or the flu; fever with low white 
blood cell counts; life threatening infections/infections leading to death. 
- Metabolism and nutrition disorders: Dehydration; gout. 
- Vascular disorders: Blood clots in the leg or lung; localized collection of 
blood outside the blood vessel; inflammation of the vein(s). 
- Kidney or urinary disorders: Kidney damage or failure; problems with urination 
or bladder control; pain while urinating. 
- Ear disorders: Ringing in the ears. 
- Heart disorders: Rapid or slow heart rate; abnormal heart rhythm; palpitations; 
heart failure; complete block of the electrical system in the heart; heart attack; 
inflammation of the heart muscle. 
- Investigations: Weight gain. 
- Blood disorders: Breakage of red blood cells. 
SUPPLY: Bristol-Myers Squibb. 
4.0 Patient Eligibility 
 
Inclusion Criteria 
1. Patients with high risk multiple myeloma who are transplant candidates, in 
partial response (PR) or better. 
High risk will be defined as patients with any of the following: 
a. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showing t(4:14), t(14:16), t(14:20), gain 
(amp) 1q; deletion (Del) 17/17p [or tp53 gene mutation/deletion by next 
generation sequencing (NGS), or by conventional cytogenetics] 
b. Deletion 13 by conventional cytogenetic analysis 
c. High risk signatures as determined by the GEP-70 or EMC-92 gene 
expression profiles 
d. Relapsed disease within 18 months of prior ASCT 
 
2. Patients with plasma cell leukemia. 
 
 
3. 18 to 75 years old. 
 
4. Performance score of at least 70% by Karnofsky or 0 to 2 ECOG. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 18 of 37 
 
 
 
5. Adequate major organ system function as demonstrated by: 
a. Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40%. 
b. Pulmonary function test (PFT) demonstrating a diffusion capacity of least 40% 
predicted. 
c. Estimated serum creatinine clearance >/=60 ml/min (using the Cockroft-Gault 
formula: creatinine clearance = [(140-age)*kg/(72*serum creatinine)] * 0.85 if 
female) and/or serum creatinine </=1.6 mg/dL. 
d. SGPT less than 3 x upper limit of normal. 
e. Total bilirubin less than 2 x upper limit of normal. 
 
6. All study participants must be registered into the mandatory Revlimid REMS
TM
 
program, and be willing and able to comply with the requirements of the Revlimid 
REMS
TM program. 
 
7. Females of reproductive potential must adhere to the scheduled 
pregnancy testing as required in the Revlimid REMS
TM program (see 
Appendix C). 
8. Men must agree to use a latex condom during sexual contact with females of child 
bearing potential even if they have had a successful vasectomy. 
 
9. Patients must have a CB unit available which is matched with the patient at 4, 5, 
or 6/6 HLA class I (serological) and II (molecular) antigens. 
 
10. Patient or legally authorized representative able to sign informed consent. 
 
Exclusion Criteria 
1. Patients receiving any other investigational agents. 
 
2. History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or 
biologic composition to melphalan. 
 
3. Known hypersensitivity or desquamating rash to either thalidomide 
or lenalidomide. 
 
4. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active 
infection, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >160, diastolic >100 despite 
antihypertensive therapy, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina 
pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit 
compliance with study requirements. 
 
5. HIV-positive patients are excluded due to increased risk of lethal infections when 
treated with myeloablative chemotherapy. 
5.0 Treatment Plan 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 19 of 37 
 
 
The investigational component of the proposed treatment plan is the infusion of 
ex-vivo expanded CB NK cells with elotuzumab and lenalidomide in the setting of 
autologous stem cell transplantation. 
The transplant day is referred as day zero (D0), treatment plan activities prior or 
after D0 are denominated as day minus (D-) or day plus (D+). 
 
The production of the NK cells will be carried out by the Good Manufacturing 
Process (GMP) Laboratory at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. This process will start 
no less than 14 days (D-19) prior to its infusion which is D-5. 
 
The targeted CD34+ cell dose for the autologous peripheral blood stem cell graft is 
at least 4.0 x 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg, except those with relapsed disease within 18 
months of prior ASCT, who should have at least 2.5 x 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg 
available. 
 
Up to 60 patients will be enrolled. 
The study schema is depicted below: 
 
 
 
Chemotherapy agents, doses, and administration. 
 
 
Elotuzumab will be dosed at 10 mg/kg to be given on day -15 (out-patient) 
and day -8 (in-patient). Elotuzumab will be provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb. 
 
Pre-medication with dexamethasone, acetaminophen, diphenhydramine and 
ranitidine (see dosing below): 
a) Dexamethasone: Give dexamethasone 28 mg PO 3 to 24 hours before 
elotuzumab infusion plus dexamethasone 8 mg IV 45 to 90 minutes prior to 
infusion. 
b) Acetaminophen 650 to 1000 mg PO X 1 
c) Diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg PO or IV X 1 
d) Ranitidine: 50 mg IV or 150 mg PO X 1 
 
Monitor for infusion reaction. Interrupt infusion for grade 2 or higher infusion 
reactions; if the reaction resolves or improves to ꞏ  grade 1, may resume infusion 
(see Dosage Adjustment for Toxicity). Monitor vital signs every 30 minutes during 
and for 2 hours after the end of the infusion in patients who experience an infusion 
reaction. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 20 of 37 
 
 
 
Infusion rate: First infusion: Infuse at 0.5 mL/minute for the first 30 minutes; 
increase to 1 mL/minute for the next 30 minutes if no infusion reactions occur. If this 
rate is tolerated, then increase to 2 mL/minute max rate until infusion is complete. 
 
Melphalan is commercially available, and patients will be using the commercial 
supply. 
 
Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) will be provided to research subjects for the duration of 
their participation in this trial at no charge to them or their insurance providers. 
Lenalidomide will be provided in accordance with the Celgene Corporation’s/Bristol-
Myers Squibb’s Revlimid REMS
TM program.  Per standard Revlimid REMS
TM program 
requirements,  all physicians who prescribe lenalidomide for research subjects 
enrolled into this trial, and all research subjects enrolled into this trial, must be 
registered in, and must comply with, all requirements of the Revlimid REMS
TM 
program. 
 
Drug will be shipped on a per patient basis by the contract pharmacy to the clinic site 
for IND studies. Only enough lenalidomide for one cycle of therapy will be supplied 
to the patient each cycle. 
 
Must follow pregnancy testing requirements as outlined in the Revlimid REMS
TM 
program material (see Appendix C). 
 
From D-8 to D-2, lenalidomide will be administered at a dose of 10 mg PO daily. 
 
Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test with a 
sensitivity of at least 50 mIU/mL within 10-14 days prior to and again 24 hours of 
prescribing lenalidomide (prescriptions must be filled within 7 days). 
 
If a dose of lenalidomide is missed, it should be taken as soon as possible on the 
same day. If it is missed for the entire day, it should not be made up. 
 
Patients who take more than the prescribed dose of lenalidomide should be 
instructed to seek emergency medical care if needed and contact study staff 
immediately. 
 
On D-15, elotuzumab will be administered at 10 mg/kg IV as an outpatient. 
Day -9, admission and IV hydration. 
On D-8, patient will be admitted to start hydration. Elotuzumab will be administered 
at 10 mg/kg IV. 
 
On D-7, high-dose melphalan will be administered at a dose of 200 mg/m
2 IV. 
 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 21 of 37 
 
 
Melphalan will be dosed as follows: for patients whose actual body weight is < 40% 
above ideal body weight, the actual body weight is used to calculate the body 
surface area (BSA). For patients whose actual body weight is >40% above ideal 
body weight, an “adjusted body weight” is used to calculate the BSA. 
 
Formula to calculate adjusted body weight: Adjusted BW (Kg) = IBW + 0.5 (Actual 
body weight - IBW). 
 
On D-5, the NK cell infusion of 1 x 10
8 cells/kg will be administered intravenously. 
This may occur on Day -6 or Day -4 if necessary per the Cell Therapy Laboratory. 
Premedicate with Benadryl 25 mg IV and Tylenol 650 mg po. The use of steroids is 
contraindicated. 
 
If target NK cell dose is not reached, we will give the dose that has been generated. 
 
 
NK cells will be obtained by the following method: 
Frozen cord blood units will be thawed and mononuclear cells will be isolated by 
Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. NK cells will be generated over 14 days in 
liquid cultures using APC feeder cells as described in detail in the Chemistry, 
Manufacturing and Controls (CMC). 
 
NK Product Release Criteria 
The following minimum criteria will be required for release of the expanded NK cells 
for reinfusion: 
 
Stat Gram stain is reported as “No Organisms Seen”. 
CD3+ number is < 2 e5 CD3+ cells/kg. 
Visual inspection reveals “No Evidence of Contamination” (turbidity; change in media 
color). 
Endotoxin Assay- < 5EU/Kg. 
Viability is greater than 70%. 
Other parameters which will be monitored include sterility culture for bacteria and 
fungi. 
 
If more than 2 e5 CD3+ cells/kg are present, a second cycle of CD3 depletion may 
be performed. The cell dose for infusion may be reduced so that the infused CD3+ 
cells are 2 e5/ kg. 
On D0, autologous stem cell infusion minimum cell dose of 2 e6 cells/kg. 
 
Filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio, G-CSF) at a dose of 5 mcg/kg/day (round up to the nearest 
vial) subcutaneously beginning on D0, and continuing until evidence of an absolute 
neutrophil count (ANC) of 0.5 x 10
9/L per 3 consecutive days. 
 
Supportive treatment 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 22 of 37 
 
 
All patients will receive supportive care as clinically indicated following standard 
practice. 
6.0 Pretreatment Evaluation 
Disease assessment prior to start treatment (baseline). 
Studies listed below will be done prior to start of treatment only if these were not done   
before study entry either as part of diagnostic or routine pre-transplant workup. 
1. Bone marrow aspirate and biopsies with cytogenetics 
2. Bone survey with long bones 
3. SPEP and serum IFE, 
4. UPEP and urine IFE, 
5. Serum free light chain assay, immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, IgM 
6. Beta 2 microglobulin 
7. Assessment of baseline toxicity 
 
Prior to start Preparative Regimen: 
Women of childbearing age must have a pregnancy test within 10-14 days and again 24 
hours before prescribing lenalidomide, then 4 weeks after therapy discontinued. 
7.0  Evaluation During Study 
1. Peripheral blood for NK chimerism studies: 
The first 12 patients will have chimerism analysis up to twice a week (as permitted by 
laboratory availability) from D-4 to D+7, then only if positive for donor NK cells, weekly 
up to around D+30 (+/- 3 days). After D+30 and until D+100 is not mandatory, only if 
possible while the patient comes for routine follow up as below. The next six patients 
may have NK chimerisms if additional funding is obtained. 
2. GvHD assessment: 
After the NK infusion (D-5) at each visit or as clinically indicated. When symptoms of 
GvHD are suspected a biopsy must be done prior to initiating treatment. 
 
3. Disease assessment around D+30 and D+100, and then around 6 months and 12 
months post-transplant (can replace the nearest timepoint): 
 
 
1. Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy for morphology and flow, and may add 
cytogenetics/FISH studies if cytogenetic abnormalities were diagnosed at 
baseline. 
2. SPEP +/- serum IFE. 
3. UPEP +/- urine IFE. 
4. Serum free light chain assay, immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, IgM. 
5. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or NT-Pro-BNP, only if history or new 
concerns for amyloidosis. 
4. The following lab tests are to be performed as frequently as clinically indicated: 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 23 of 37 
 
 
CBC, differential, platelets, SGPT, calcium, glucose, uric acid, magnesium, serum 
bilirubin, BUN and creatinine, serum protein, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, 
electrolytes, urinalysis. 
 
5. Pregnancy Testing: 
Pregnancy tests for females of childbearing potential. A female of childbearing potential 
(FCBP) is a sexually mature female who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or 
bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 
consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive 
months). 
 
For FCBP, pregnancy tests must occur within 10 - 14 days and again within 24 hours 
prior to prescribing lenalidomide. (prescriptions must be filled within 7 days) and at Day 
+30 (+/- 2 days) post the last dose (D-2) of lenalidomide (see Appendix C.: Risks of 
Fetal Exposure, Pregnancy Testing Guidelines and Acceptable Birth Control Methods). 
 
8.0 Study Definitions 
 
 
8.1  Disease Response 
International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria. 
All response categories require two consecutive assessments made at any time. 
All response categories require no known evidence of progressive or new bone 
lesions. 
 
Stringent complete response (sCR) (all of the following): 
1. CR as defined. 
2. Normal free light chain ratio 
3. Absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by inmmunohistochemistry or 
immunofluorescence (defined by absence of abnormal / ratio of  4:1 or  1:2) 
 
Complete response (CR) (all of the following): 
1. Negative immunofixation in serum and urine. 
2. < 5% plasma cells in the bone marrow. 
3. Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas. 
 
Note: While healing of preexisting bone lesions is not required, no new lytic lesions 
should appear. Further compression fracture of previously known spine lesion will 
not be considered as progressive disease. 
 
Very good partial response (VGPR) (one of the following): 
1. Serum and urine M protein detectable by immunofixation but not by 
electrophoresis. 
2. 90% or greater reduction in serum M protein plus urine M protein level <100 mg 
per 4h. 
 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 24 of 37 
 
 
Partial response (PR) (all of the following): 
1. Reduction by > 50% in serum monoclonal protein. 
2. Reduction of urinary monoclonal protein to < 200 mg/24h or >90%. 
 
 
Stable disease: 
1. Not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR or PD. 
 
Progressive disease (PD) (any one or more of the following):  Increase of >/= 25% 
from baseline in: 
Serum M protein (absolute increase must be >/= 0.5 g/dL). 
Urine M component (absolute increase must be >/= 200 mg/24h).Only in patients 
without measurable serum and urine M protein levels. 
Difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must 
be > 10 mg/dL). 
Bone marrow plasma percentage (absolute % must be >/=10%). 
1. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite 
increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. 
2. Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 
2.65 mol/L) that can be solely attributed to the myeloma. 
 
Relapse from CR (any one or more of the following): 
1. Reappearance of serum or urine M protein by immunofixation or electrophoresis. 
2. Development >/=5% plasma cells in the bone marrow. 
3. Appearance of any other sign of progression (i.e., new plasmacytoma, lytic bone 
lesion or hypercalcemia). 
 
 
8.2  Active treatment administration is defined from the first day of treatment  
 
administration as outlined in the treatment plan through D0. 
 
8.3 Active treatment period is defined from Day -5 (the start of NK cell infusion) 
through Day +30. 
 
 
8.4  Follow-up period is defined from BMT Day +31 until 12 months post-transplant. 
 
 
8.5  Engraftment 
Engraftment is defined as a sustained ANC >/= 0.5 x 10
9/L for 3 consecutive 
days. 
Primary Graft Failure is defined as failure to achieve an ANC >/= 0.5 x 10
9/L for 
3 consecutive days by day +28. 
9.0 
Evaluation of Adverse Events 
The Investigator or physician designee is responsible for verifying and providing source 
documentation for all adverse events and assigning the attribution for each event for all 
subjects enrolled on the trial. 
 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 25 of 37 
 
 
Adverse events and protocol specific data will be entered into PDMS/CORe. 
PDMS/CORe will be used as the electronic case report form for this protocol. 
 
Severity of the adverse events (AEs) 
The severity of the adverse events (AEs) will be graded according to the Common 
Terminology Criteria v4.03 (CTCAE) from Day -5 (the start of NK cell infusion) up to 
D+30 (+3 days if necessary). Events not included in the CTCAE chart will be scored as 
follows: 
General grading: 
Grade 1: Mild: discomfort present with no disruption of daily activity, no treatment 
required beyond prophylaxis. 
Grade 2: Moderate: discomfort present with some disruption of daily activity, require 
treatment. 
Grade 3: Severe: discomfort that interrupts normal daily activity, not responding to first 
line treatment. 
Grade 4: Life Threatening: discomfort that represents immediate risk of death 
 
Causality Assessment 
The investigational component of the treatment plan of this study is the is the infusion of 
 
ex-vivo expanded CB NK cells when administrated with elotuzumab, lenalidomide, 
high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation. 
 
Therefore, events known to be caused by the NK cell infusion and its direct 
consequences will be assessed as definitely related when assessing the casuality. 
When the relationship of the adverse event cannot be rule out between the NK cell 
infusion and the treatment plan, the event will be scored as probably or possible related. 
Events known to be related to drugs used as part of the treatment plan as well as to 
drugs used as supportive treatment will be scored as unrelated to the NK cells infusion. 
 
Causality will be determined as per the guidelines above and based on the expected 
toxicities listed below. 
 
The principal investigator will be the final arbiter in determining the causality 
assessment. 
 
AEs related to the NK cells infusion: 
1. These expected events will be monitored during the first 24 hours post infusion: 
· 
fever, 
· 
chills, 
· 
decrease in blood pressure, 
· 
rash, 
· 
shortness of breath. 
2. Dose limiting, (also considered unexpected): 
· 
grade 4 NK infusion related toxicity, 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 26 of 37 
 
 
· 
failure to engraft by D+28 or delayed engraftment, 
· 
grades 3-5 allergic reactions related to study cell 
infusion, 
· 
grade 3-5 organ toxicity (cardiac, dermatologic, 
gastrointestinal, hepatic, pulmonary, 
renal/genitourinary, or neurologic) not pre-existing or 
due to the underlying malignancy or due to preparative 
chemotherapy and occurring within 30 days (+3 days if 
necessary)post-transplant, 
· 
grades 3-4 acute GVHD occurring within 45 
dayspost-transplant,
[10]
 
· treatment-related death within 8 weeks of the study 
cell infusion.
[32]
 
 
Expected AEs related to high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell 
infusion are: 
· 
Related to myelosuppression: thrombocytopenia, bleeding, 
platelets and RBCs transfusions. 
· Fever: Non Neutropenic or Neutropenic without infection. 
· Infections in the presence or absence of neutropenia. 
· 
Readmissions (lasting <10 days). 
· 
Cytopenias post transplant including secondary graft 
failure. 
· 
Low blood pressure due to dehydration requiring fluid 
replacement. 
· 
Fluid overload leading to cardiac dysfunction. 
· 
GI related: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis. 
· 
Organ dysfunction: cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, CNS 
and/ or renal. 
· 
Stem Cell Transplant Syndromes: Cytokine Storm, 
TTP, hemorrhagic cystitis, interstitial pneumonitis 
(including pulmonary hemorrhage). 
 
Adverse Events Considered Serious: 
· 
Grade 4 NK infusion related toxicity. 
· 
Failure to engraft or delayed engraftment. 
· 
GvHD. 
· 
Prolonged hospitalization due to infections and/or 
organ failure requiring extensive supportive care (i.e. 
dialysis, mechanical ventilation). 
· 
Any expected or unexpected event resulting in an 
irreversible condition and/ or leading to death. 
 
For the purpose of this study, abnormal laboratory findings considered associated to the 
original disease as well as isolated changes in laboratory parameters such as 
electrolyte magnesium and metabolic imbalances, uric acid changes, elevations of GPT, 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 27 of 37 
 
 
GOT, LDH and alkaline phosphatase would not be considered adverse events and will 
not be collected in the database. 
 
Pregnancies 
Pregnancies and suspected pregnancies (including a positive pregnancy test regardless 
of age or disease state) of a female subject occurring while the subject is on 
Lenalidomide, or within 28 days of the subject’s last dose of lenalidomide, are 
considered immediately reportable events. Lenalidomide is to be discontinued 
immediately. The pregnancy, suspected pregnancy, or positive pregnancy test must be 
reported to Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb Drug Safety immediately by facsimile or 
email, using the Pregnancy Initial Report Form. The female subject should be referred 
to an obstetrician-gynecologist, preferably one experienced in reproductive toxicity for 
further evaluation and counseling. 
 
The Investigator will follow the female subject until completion of the pregnancy, and 
must notify Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb Drug Safety and Bristol-Myers Squibb 
immediately about the outcome of the pregnancy (either normal or abnormal outcome) 
using the Pregnancy Follow-up Report Form. If the outcome of the pregnancy was 
abnormal (e.g., spontaneous or therapeutic abortion), the Investigator should report the 
abnormal outcome as an AE. If the abnormal outcome meets any of the serious criteria, 
it must be reported as an SAE to Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb Drug Safety 
immediately by facsimile, or other appropriate method, within 24 hours of the 
Investigator’s knowledge of the event using the SAE Report Form. 
 
All neonatal deaths that occur within 28 days of birth should be reported, without regard 
to causality, as SAEs. In addition, any infant death after 28 days that the Investigator 
suspects is related to the in utero exposure to the lenalidomide should also be reported 
to Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb Drug Safety and Bristol-Myers Squibb immediately by 
facsimile, or other appropriate method, within 24 hours of the Investigator’s knowledge 
of the event using the SAE Report Form. 
 
Male Subjects 
If a female partner of a male subject taking investigational product becomes pregnant, 
the male subject taking Lenalidomide should notify the Investigator, and the pregnant 
female partner should be advised to call their healthcare provider immediately. 
 
 
 
Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb Drug Safety Contact Information: 
Celgene Corporation/Bristol-Myers Squibb 
Global Drug Safety and Risk Management 
Connell Corporate Park 
300 Connell Dr. Suite 6000 
Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922 
Fax: 
(908) 673-9115 
E-mail: 
drugsafety@celgene.com 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 28 of 37 
 
 
 
Bristol-Myers Squibb Contact Information: 
All SAEs must be reported by confirmed facsimile (fax) transmission or reported via 
electronic mail to: 
 
BMS Worldwide Safety 
 
SAE Email Address: Worldwide.Safety@BMS.com 
 
SAE Facsimile Number: +1-609-818-3804 
 
If only limited information is initially available, follow-up reports may be required. 
 
Data Collection 
From Day -5 (start of NK cell infusion) up to D+30 (+3 days if necessary), only adverse 
events considered unexpected and related will be collected. The data will reflect the 
onset and resolution date and maximum grade. Intermittent events should be labeled as 
such and followed until resolution. If a patient is taken off study while an event still 
ongoing, this will be followed until resolution unless another therapy is initiated. 
Pre-existing medical conditions will be recorded only if an exacerbation occurs during 
the active treatment period. Medical events not considered adverse events will not be 
collected. Co-morbid events will not be scored separately. All adverse events will be 
documented in the medical record and entered into the CRF. 
 
Concurrent medication 
As stated in the treatment plan, patients treated on this protocol will require supportive 
care treatment (concurrent medication). These medications are considered standard of 
care and have no scientific contributions to the protocol, therefore no data will be 
captured on the various medications needed or their side effects. 
10.0  
Statistical Design 
10.1 Study Design 
 
This study has three primary objectives: 
 
1. To find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of UCB-derived NK cells. 
2. To determine efficacy by the percent of patients achieving VGPR + CR at 3 months 
post-transplant. 
3. To assess the minimal residual disease rate 100 days post-transplant in high-risk 
patients. 
 
The study has two parts. In Part I, we will employ the phase I study design developed 
by Ji et al.
[30] to find the MTD of NK cells. We will consider four dose levels of NK: 
 
1) 5 x 10
6 cells/kg 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 29 of 37 
 
 
2) 1 x 10
7 cells/kg 
3) 5 x 10
7 cells/kg 
4) 1 x 10
8 cells/kg 
 
Prior to advancing/changing dose levels a cohort summary must be completed and 
submitted to the Clinical Research Monitor (IND Office). 
 
DLT is defined as grade 4 NK infusion related toxicity; failure to engraft by D+28 or 
delayed engraftment; grades 3-5 allergic reactions related to study cell infusion; grade 
3-5 organ toxicity (cardiac, dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, pulmonary, 
renal/genitourinary, or neurologic) not pre-existing or due to the underlying 
malignancy or due to preparative chemotherapy and occurring within 30 days (+3 if 
necessary) post-transplant; grades 3-4 acute GVHD occurring within 45 days post-
transplant;
[10]  treatment-related death within 8 weeks of the study cell infusion.
[32] The 
dose escalation scheme is outlined in Table 1 below. 
DLT will be assessed within 30 days (+3 days if necessary) post-transplant. The 
maximum acceptable toxicity rate is 20%. We assume the prior distribution of the 
toxicity rate is beta (1, 1) and an equivalence interval of (0.175, 0.225). 
 
We will enroll a maximum of 42 patients in this part of the study*. We will begin by 
enrolling 3 patients at the dose 5 x 10
6 cells/kg, and we will enroll patients in cohorts of 
size 3. Table 1 illustrates the trial monitoring chart to determine whether one should: 
 
1) Escalate to the next higher dose (E), 
2) Continue to enroll patients at the current dose (S), 
3) De-escalate to the next lower dose (D), or 
4) Determine that the current dose is unacceptable (DU). 
 
* Note that the protocol originally planned to enroll 30 patients in the dose-escalation 
phase, after which the MTD would be determined, and an additional 12 patients would 
have been treated at this dose with the addition of IL-2. Based upon current clinical 
knowledge, we will not add IL-2, and the additional 12 patients will be used instead to 
provide additional information to better estimate the MTD. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 30 of 37 
 
 
Table 1. Phase I Dose-Finding Trial Monitoring Chart 
 
 
 
There are 2 exceptions to the above decisions. These are: 
 
1) If the current dose level is 5 x 10
6 cells/kg and the action is D, then treat future 
patients at 5 x 10
6 cells/kg. 
 
2) If the current dose level is 1 x 10
8 cells/kg and the action is E, then treat future 
patients at 1 x 10
8 cells/kg. 
 
Otherwise Part 1 of the trial will be stopped when the maximum sample size of 42 
patients is reached. The MTD is defined as the highest dose for which the probability of 
toxicity is closest to 20%. Table 2 presents the operating characteristics of the proposed 
design of this trial for 5 scenarios defined by different toxicity rates for the 4 doses. 
These operating characteristics are based on 2000 simulations of the trial. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 31 of 37 
 
 
Table 2. Operating Characteristics of Study Design 
 
 
After Part I is complete, we will treat an additional 30 high-risk patients in Part II, Dose 
Expansion. The primary endpoint for the expansion cohort is the minimal residual 
disease (MRD) negative rate 100 days post-transplant (MRD-NR100days). We expect that 
12-15 of the patients treated at the MTD in Part I will be in the high-risk group, yielding 
a total of up to 45 high-risk patients treated at this dose. 
 
10.2 Efficacy 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 32 of 37 
 
 
 
We will estimate the VGPR + CR rate for patients treated at the MTD with a 95% 
credible interval. We expect the VGPR + CR rate to be about 20% with standard 
transplant, and we assume a beta (0.40, 1.60) prior distribution for the VGPR + CR rate. 
This prior distribution has a mean of 0.20 and a standard deviation of 0.23. For 
example, if we complete the study with 66 patients treated at the MTD and 13 of these 
patients have a VGPR or CR, then the 95% credible interval will be 11.2% to 29.9%. 
We will also estimate the MRD rate at day 100 in high-risk patients treated at the MTD 
with a 95% credible interval. We will assume a Beta (1.2, 0.8) distribution for the MRD 
rate. With 45 high-risk patients at the MTD, if 27 have MRD at day 100, a 95% credible 
interval will be (45.8%, 73.4%). 
 
10.3 Analysis Plan 
 
We will use descriptive statistics to summarize patient demographic and clinical 
information. We will tabulate response by dose. We will use logistic regression methods 
to model the rate of VGPR + CR as a function of potential prognostic factors (such as 
demographics, International Staging System stage, and cytogenetic abnormalities.). We 
will similarly model the DLT rate. We will also model the MRD rate in high-risk patients 
using logistic regression. We will estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free 
survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator, and we will use Cox 
proportional hazards regression to model OS and PFS as functions of the potential 
prognostic factors noted above. 
 
10.4 Sample Size/Accrual Rate 
 
Up to 72 patients will be enrolled. Based on the data from our institution we expect to 
finish accrual in approximately 6 years. 
 
10.5 Analysis of Secondary Endpoints 
 
For duration of infused UCB-NK cells in new host the statistics will be reported as an 
average time value with standard deviation. These data may also be used as 
covariates in the regression models described above. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.0  Reporting Requirements 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 33 of 37 
 
 
Serious Adverse Event Reporting (SAE) 
 
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered “serious” if, in the 
view of either the investigator or the sponsor, it results in any of the following 
outcomes: 
 
· 
Death 
· 
A life-threatening adverse drug experience – any adverse experience that places the 
patient, in the view of the initial reporter, at immediate risk of death from the adverse 
experience as it occurred. It does not include an adverse experience that, had it 
occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death. 
· 
Grades 3-5 reactions related to study cell infusion. 
· 
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. 
· 
A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct 
normal life functions. 
· 
A congenital anomaly/birth defect. 
 
Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or 
require hospitalization may be considered a serious adverse drug experience 
when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the 
patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one 
of the outcomes listed in this definition. Examples of such medical events include 
allergic bronchospasm requiring intensive treatment in an emergency room or at 
home, blood dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in inpatient 
hospitalization, or the development of drug dependency or drug abuse (21 CFR 
312.32). 
 
· 
Important medical events as defined above, may also be considered serious 
adverse events. Any important medical event can and should be reported as an 
SAE if deemed appropriate by the Principal Investigator or the IND Sponsor, 
IND Office. 
 
· 
All events occurring during the conduct of a protocol and meeting the definition of a 
SAE must be reported to the IRB in accordance with the timeframes and procedures 
outlined in “The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional 
Review Board Policy for Investigators on Reporting Unanticipated Adverse Events 
for Drugs and Devices”. Unless stated otherwise in the protocol, all SAEs, expected 
or unexpected, must be reported to the IND Office, regardless of attribution (within 5 
working days of knowledge of the event). 
 
· 
All life-threatening or fatal events, that are unexpected, and related to the study 
drug, must have a written report submitted within 24 hours (next working day) of 
knowledge of the event to the Safety Project Manager in the IND Office. 
 
· 
Unless otherwise noted, the electronic SAE application (eSAE) will be utilized 
for safety reporting to the IND Office and MDACC IRB. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 34 of 37 
 
 
 
· 
Serious adverse events will be captured from the time of the first 
protocol-specific intervention, until 30 days after the last dose of drug, unless 
the participant withdraws consent. Serious adverse events must be followed 
until clinical recovery is complete and laboratory tests have returned to 
baseline, progression of the event has stabilized, or there has been acceptable 
resolution of the event. 
 
· 
Additionally, any serious adverse events that occur after the 30 day time 
period that are related to the study treatment must be reported to the IND 
Office. This may include the development of a secondary malignancy. 
 
Reporting to FDA: 
 
· 
Serious adverse events will be forwarded to FDA by the IND Sponsor (Safety Project 
Manager IND Office) according to 21 CFR 312.32. 
 
Grade 3-5 product infusion reactions will be reported in an expedited fashion in 
addition to all Serious Unexpected Adverse Reactions. 
 
It is the responsibility of the PI and the research team to ensure serious adverse 
events are reported according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Good Clinical 
Practices, the protocol guidelines, the sponsor’s guidelines, and Institutional 
Review Board policy. 
 
Expedited Reporting by Investigator to Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb 
Serious adverse events (SAE) are defined above.  The investigator must inform 
Celgene in writing using a Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb SAE form or MEDWATCH 
3500A form of any SAE within 24 hours of being aware of the event. The written report 
must be completed and supplied to Celgene by facsimile within 24 hours/1 business 
day. The initial report must be as complete as possible, including an assessment of the 
causal relationship between the event and the investigational product(s), if available. 
Information not available at the time of the initial report (e.g., an end date for the 
adverse event or laboratory values received after the report) must be documented on a 
follow-up report. A final report to document resolution of the SAE is required. The 
Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb tracking number 
(RV-MM-PI-0691) and the institutional protocol number should be included on SAE 
reports (or on the fax cover letter) sent to Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb. A copy of the 
fax transmission confirmation of the SAE report to Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb 
should be attached to the SAE and retained with the patient records. 
 
 
12.0  Criteria for Removal from the Study 
1. Patient withdrawal of consent. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 35 of 37 
 
 
2. Inability to produce the NK product. 
3. Patient's lack of compliance with the requirements of the study. 
4. Patient's intercurrent illness that, in the opinion of the Investigator, will affect 
their ability to conform to the study protocol. 
5. Disease progression requiring salvage treatment. 
6. At study completion around 12 months post-transplant. 
7. Graft failure requiring further treatment. 
 
 
13.0  References 
1. 
Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Casucci M, Volpi I, Tosti A, Perruccio K, Urbani E, Negrin 
RS, Martelli MF, Velardi A. Role of natural killer cell alloreactivity in 
HLA-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 1999;94:333-9. 
2. 
Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Urbani E, Perruccio K, Shlomchik WD, Tosti A, Posati 
S,  Rogaia D, Frassoni F, Aversa F and others. Effectiveness of donor natural killer 
cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science 2002;295:2097-
100. 
3. 
Shlomchik WD, Couzens MS, Tang CB, McNiff J, Robert ME, Liu J, Shlomchik 
MJ, Emerson SG. Prevention of graft versus host disease by inactivation of host 
antigen-presenting cells. Science 1999;285:412-5. 
4. 
Ellis TM, McKenzie RS, Simms PE, Helfrich BA, Fisher RI. Induction of human 
lymphokine-activated killer cells by IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma. J Immunol 
1989;143:4282-6. 
5. 
Caligiuri MA, Zmuidzinas A, Manley TJ, Levine H, Smith KA, Ritz J. Functional 
consequences of interleukin 2 receptor expression on resting human 
lymphocytes. Identification of a novel natural killer cell subset with high affinity 
receptors. J Exp Med 1990;171:1509-26. 
6. 
Baume DM, Robertson MJ, Levine H, Manley TJ, Schow PW, Ritz J. Differential 
responses to interleukin 2 define functionally distinct subsets of human natural 
killer cells. Eur J Immunol 1992;22:1-6. 
7. 
Passweg JR, Stern M, Koehl U, Uharek L, Tichelli A. Use of natural killer cells in 
hematopoetic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 
2005;35:637-43. 
8. 
Hsu KC, Gooley T, Malkki M, Pinto-Agnello C, Dupont B, Bignon JD, Bornhauser 
M, Christiansen F, Gratwohl A, Morishima Y and others. KIR ligands and 
prediction of relapse after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for 
hematologic malignancy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006;12:828-36. 
9. 
Miller JS, Soignier Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, McNearney SA, Yun GH, Fautsch 
SK, McKenna D, Le C, Defor TE, Burns LJ and others. Successful adoptive 
transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with 
cancer. Blood 2005;105:3051-7. 
10. 
Shi J, Tricot G, Szmania S, Rosen N, Garg TK, Malaviarachchi PA, Moreno A, 
Dupont B, Hsu KC, Baxter-Lowe LA and others. Infusion of haplo-identical killer 
immunoglobulin-like receptor ligand mismatched NK cells for relapsed myeloma 
in the setting of autologous stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 
2008;143:641-53. 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 36 of 37 
 
 
11. 
Alici E, Konstantinidis KV, Sutlu T, Aints A, Gahrton G, Ljunggren HG, Dilber MS. 
Anti-myeloma activity of endogenous and adoptively transferred activated natural 
killer cells in experimental multiple myeloma model. Exp Hematol 
2007;35:1839-46. 
12. 
Sze DM, Brown R, Yang S, Ho PJ, Gibson J, Joshua D. The use of thalidomide 
in myeloma therapy as an effective anticancer drug. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 
2006;6:325-31. 
13. 
Zhu D, Corral LG, Fleming YW, Stein B. Immunomodulatory drugs Revlimid 
(lenalidomide) and CC-4047 induce apoptosis of both hematological and solid 
tumor cells through NK cell activation. Cancer Immunol Immunother 
2008;57:1849-59. 
14. 
Shi J, Tricot GJ, Garg TK, Malaviarachchi PA, Szmania SM, Kellum RE, Storrie 
B, Mulder A, Shaughnessy JD, Jr., Barlogie B and others. Bortezomib 
down-regulates the cell-surface expression of HLA class I and enhances natural 
killer cell-mediated lysis of myeloma. Blood 2008;111:1309-17. 
15. 
Straube C, Wehner R, Wendisch M, Bornhauser M, Bachmann M, Rieber EP, 
Schmitz M. Bortezomib significantly impairs the immunostimulatory capacity of 
human myeloid blood dendritic cells. Leukemia 2007;21:1464-71. 
16. 
Jurisic V, Srdic T, Konjevic G, Markovic O, Colovic M. Clinical stage-depending 
decrease of NK cell activity in multiple myeloma patients. Med Oncol 
2007;24:312-7. 
17. 
Fauriat C, Mallet F, Olive D, Costello RT. Impaired activating receptor expression 
pattern in natural killer cells from patients with multiple myeloma. Leukemia 
2006;20:732-3. 
18. 
Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A, Jacobsen N, 
Ruutu T, de Lima M, Finke J and others. Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or 
bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med 
2004;351:2276-85. 
19. 
Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, Champlin RE, 
Stevens C, Barker JN, Gale RP, Lazarus HM and others. Outcomes after 
transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults 
with leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2265-75. 
20. 
Tse WW, Zang SL, Bunting KD, Laughlin MJ. Umbilical cord blood 
transplantation in adult myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 
2008;41:465-72. 
21. 
Brunstein CG, Baker KS, Wagner JE. Umbilical cord blood transplantation for 
myeloid malignancies. Curr Opin Hematol 2007;14:162-9. 
22. 
Wei Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Cao Q, Meng Q, Lan J, Chen L. Ex vivo 
expansion of CD34(+) and T and NK cells from umbilical cord blood for leukemic 
BALB/C nude mouse transplantation. Int J Hematol 2008;87:217-224. 
23. 
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 
2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96. 
24. 
Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, Brown J, 
Drayson MT, Selby PJ. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell 
rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1875-83. 
25. 
Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hussein MA, Bolejack V, Moore DF, Sr., Whittenberger 

2011-0379 Version 26.0 
    19 February 2020 
Page 37 of 37 
 
 
BF, Abidi MH, Durie BG, Barlogie B. Lenalidomide and high-dose 
dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for multiple 
myeloma: a randomized Southwest Oncology Group trial (S0232). 
Blood;116:5838-41. 
26. 
Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, Wang M, Belch A, Stadtmauer EA, Siegel D, 
Borrello I, Rajkumar SV, Chanan-Khan AA and others. Lenalidomide plus 
dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North America. N Engl J Med 
2007;357:2133-42. 
27. 
Dimopoulos M, Spencer A, Attal M, Prince HM, Harousseau JL, Dmoszynska A, 
San Miguel J, Hellmann A, Facon T, Foa R and others. Lenalidomide plus 
dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 
2007;357:2123-32. 
28. 
De Lima M, St John LS, Wieder ED, Lee MS, McMannis J, Karandish S, 
Giralt S, Beran M, Couriel D, Korbling M and others. Double-chimaerism 
after transplantation of two human leucocyte antigen mismatched, unrelated cord 
blood units. Br J Haematol 2002;119:773-6. 
29. 
Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, Blade J, Barlogie B, Anderson K, Gertz M, 
Dimopoulos M, Westin J, Sonneveld P and others. International uniform 
response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006;20:1467-73. 
30. 
Ji Y, Liu P, Li Y, and Bekele BN. A modified toxicity probability interval method 
for dose-finding trials. Clinical Trials. 2010;7:653-663. 
31. 
Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, Thomas 
ED. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow 
Transplant 1995;15:825-8. 
32. 
Klingemann H, Grodman C, Cutler E, Duque M, Kadidlo D, Klein AK, et al. 
Autologous stem cell transplant recipients tolerate haploidentical related-donor 
natural killer cell-enriched infusions. Transfusion. 2012.