Clinical Evaluation of DAILIES TOTAL 1® Multifocal Compared to 1-Day Acuvue® Moist® Multifocal in a Japanese Population
Phase: NA
Conditions: Refractive Error, Presbyopia
Sponsor: Alcon Research

Clinical evaluation of DAILIES TOTAL 1® Multifocal compared to 
1-Day Acuvue® Moist® Multifocal in a Japanese population.
CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL 
Alcon Japan Ltd. 
1-23-1 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo
Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 / NCT03341923
Project No.: A03218 
Version 1.1: 22 JAN, 2018 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
2/39 Page 
SUMMARY 
Protocol No. 
CLJ369-P001 
Objective 
The purpose of this clinical study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of DAILIES 
TOTAL1® (DT1MF) Multifocal contact lenses to 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist® Multifocal 
(AMMF) for Investigator-graded successful lens centration in Japanese population. 
Subjects 
Habitual presbyopic soft/ silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers (multifocal (MF) lenses 
only) with a near spectacle ADD of +0.50D to +2.50D (inclusive). 
Study Design 
Prospective, Multi-Center, Single Masked (Subject), Randomized, Crossover study. 
Investigational 
Products 
DAILIES TOTAL1® Multifocal (DT1MF) 
1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist® (Multifocal) (AMMF) 
Variables 
[Efficacy] 
Primary Efficacy: 
Investigator-graded successful lens centration of “Optimal” after 14±3 days of wearing. 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
3/39 Page 
 
 
 
[Safety] 
• 
Biomicroscopy findings: Slit-lamp examination 
• 
Best corrected visual acuity with trial frame 
• 
Adverse events 
• 
Device deficiencies 
Usage 
Follow the direction for use. 
Examinations 
Schedule 
• Visit 1: Study start day (Baseline visit) 
• Visit 2: Follow up visit after 14±3 days of Visit 1 
• Visit 3: Follow up visit after 14±3 days of Visit 2 
No. of Subjects 
Required: 120 subjects (at least 50% should be wearing Proclear 1 day MF contact lenses 
habitually, 1 eye per 1 subject is the analysis target) 
Planned: 134 subjects 
Study period 
From NOVEMBER 2017 to OCTOBER 2018 
Study Sponsor 
Alcon Japan Ltd. 
GCP 
This study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the 
Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Studies (2014, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, 
Science and Technology and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No.3, 
partial revision on 28 February, 2017), in principle. 
 
 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
4/39 Page 
 
 
Amendment  
Purpose of amendment: 
The purpose of this amendment is to make a clarification of typo this protocol. 
 
Current study status: 
 
Case Report Form Revision Required: 
 
Yes 
X 
No 
 
Informed Consent Modifications Required: 
 
Yes 
X 
No 
 
 
Applicable Investigators: 
 
All 
 
Selected (list below) X No 
 
Itemized Changes: 
Items 
Protocol ver.1.0 
Protocol ver. 1.1 
6. STUDY PROCEDURE 
(2) Examinations Schedule 
Table Examinations 
Schedule 
Adverse events 
Adverse events, Device Deficiencies 
*1: Allowance for next visit: the day 
after 11 to 14 days from the present 
visit. 
*1: Allowance for next visit: the day 
after 14 ± 3 days from the present 
visit. 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
5/39 Page 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
(2) Examinations Schedule .................................................................................................................................... 4 
1. 
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 7 
(1) Circumstances ................................................................................................................................................ 7 
(2) Summary of known and possible risks and benefits to subjects .................................................................... 7 
2. 
STUDY OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................... 9 
3. 
INVESTIGATIONAL PRODUCTS ................................................................................................................. 9 
(1) INVESTIGATIONAL PRODUCTS ............................................................................................................. 9 
(2) Usage ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 
(3) Instructions on package and labeling ............................................................................................................. 9 
(4) Storage and Management .............................................................................................................................. 9 
4. 
SUBJECTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 
(1) No. of Subjects ............................................................................................................................................ 10 
(2) Inclusion Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 10 
(3) Exclusion Criteria ........................................................................................................................................ 10 
5. 
STUDY DESIGN ............................................................................................................................................ 11 
6. 
STUDY PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................... 11 
(1) Outline ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 
(2) Examinations Schedule ................................................................................................................................ 12 
(3) Method of subject enrollment ...................................................................................................................... 13 
(4) Examinations Procedure .............................................................................................................................. 13 
(5) Evaluation Method....................................................................................................................................... 17 
(6) Anticipated study period .............................................................................................................................. 21 
7. 
CONCOMITANT THERAPY ........................................................................................................................ 21 
(1) Contraindicated drugs .................................................................................................................................. 21 
(2) Contraindicated therapy ............................................................................................................................... 21 
8. 
DISCONTINUED SUBJECTS........................................................................................................................ 21 
(1) Discontinued Subjects ................................................................................................................................. 21 
(2) Discontinuation of the entire study .............................................................................................................. 22 
9. 
ANALYSIS PLAN .......................................................................................................................................... 22 
(1) Evaluability .................................................................................................................................................. 22 
(2) Demographic factors and baseline characteristics ....................................................................................... 23 
(3) Efficacy analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 23 
(4) Handling of missing data ............................................................................................................................. 25 
(5) Multiplicity .................................................................................................................................................. 25 
(6) Safety analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 25 
(7) Medical economics analysis ........................................................................................................................ 25 
(8) Interim analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 26 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
6/39 Page 
 
 
(9) Rationale for the sample size ....................................................................................................................... 26 
10. 
ADVERSE EVENTS and DEVICE DEFICIENCIES, etc. ......................................................................... 27 
(1) General Information..................................................................................................................................... 27 
(2) Procedure for Reporting of serious adverse events (SAE ............................................................................ 28 
(3) Report of adverse events and evaluation of the causal relationship............................................................. 29 
(4) Intensity Assessment of Adverse Events ..................................................................................................... 29 
(5) Follow-up of Subjects / Subjects with Adverse Events ............................................................................... 29 
(6) Pregnancy of subjects .................................................................................................................................. 29 
(7) Provision of safety information ................................................................................................................... 29 
11. 
ETHICS ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 
(1) Ethics committee ......................................................................................................................................... 30 
(2) Ethical consideration ................................................................................................................................... 30 
(3) Protection of subjects’ privacy .................................................................................................................... 30 
(4) Specifications to secure safety of study subjects ......................................................................................... 30 
(5) Compensation for health hazards ................................................................................................................. 31 
(6) Payment to subjects ..................................................................................................................................... 31 
12. 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS ................................................................................................................... 31 
13. 
CONSIDERATIONS FOR DOCUMENTATION AND COMPLETION OF CASE REPORT FORM .... 31 
14. 
MONITORING ........................................................................................................................................... 31 
15. 
RETENTION OF THE RECORDS ............................................................................................................. 31 
16. 
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PUBLICATION OF STUDY ........................................................................ 32 
17. 
DIRECT ACCESS TO SOURCE DATA AND DOCUMENTS ................................................................ 32 
18. 
QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF THE STUDY .............................................. 32 
19. 
OBLIGATIONS OF INVESTIGATORS .................................................................................................... 32 
20. 
INFORMED CONSENT ............................................................................................................................. 36 
21. 
CONFLICT OF INTEREST ........................................................................................................................ 38 
22. 
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 38 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
7/39 Page 
 
 
1. INTRODUCTION 
(1) Circumstances 
Presbyopia is defined as the normal loss of accommodation that occurs with age1), where the cause of the loss is 
associated with the sclerosis of crystalline lens1). It has been reported that the sclerosis of crystalline lens 
exponentially increases at around age 451). While there are many ways to correct presbyopia such as eye glasses, 
contact lenses (CL) and keratomileusis (a corneal reshaping surgery to correct presbyopia or multifocal intra ocular 
lens)2), the use of multifocal type CL (MFCL) to correct presbyopia is gradually increasing3). However, it has been 
reported that there are more people who are discontinuing the use of CL due to discomfort and visual acuity issues 
above age 40 for whom it is considered necessary to correct presbyopia than the people below age 404). 
Alcon Japan Ltd., has launched DAILIES TOTAL1® Multifocal (DT1MF), the silicone hydrogel contact lenses 
that are superior in comfort5) in July, 2017. DT1MF adopts the optical design with progressive add power by adding 
add power to realize seamless visual performance concentrically6). It is considered that center stability of MFCL on 
cornea when wearing CL is critical in terms of visual performance of contact lenses7), lens centration, lens fitting, 
subjective ratings (overall quality of vision, lens comfort at the end of a day, visual performance (far, 
intermediate(distance) and near), eye fatigue (stiff shoulder, headache, dry eye, eye pain, heavy feeling in the back 
of eyes, eyestrain), lens comfort throughout the day), binocular VA (far, intermediate, near), corneal staining, 
conjunctival staining, lens surface wettability and lens deposit will be assessed in comparison to 1-Day ACUVUE® 
MOIST® Multifocal (AMMF)8) contact lenses similar to DT1MF in the optical design which uses hydroxyethyl 
methacrylate in the material as a control.  
This study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the Ethical Guidelines 
for Clinical Studies (2014, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and Ministry of 
Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No.3, partial revision on 28 February, 2017), in principle. 
 
(2) Summary of known and possible risks and benefits to subjects 
Regarding the investigational devices assessed in this study, DT1MF and AMMF, Alcon Japan Ltd., and Johnson 
& Johnson K.K. Vision Care Company, respectively, were granted marketing approval in Japan in February 2017 
and December 2014, respectively. The safety and efficacy information on the two investigational devices are 
described below. 
 
1) Information on Safety 
[1] Items common to DT1MF and AMMF  
The following warnings and contraindications stated in direction for use are common to both investigational 
devices: 
[Warnings] 
• Contact lens wear could result in corneal epithelial problems including corneal ulcer, keratitis (including 
infectious keratitis), corneal infiltration, and corneal erosion, as well as corneal edema, conjunctivitis 
(including giant papillary conjunctivitis), iritis, and corneal neovascularization, and may accelerate a 
decrease in corneal endothelial cells. 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
8/39 Page 
 
 
[Contraindications] 
• Acute and subacute inflammations of anterior eye segment 
• Eye infection 
• Uveitis 
• Decreased corneal sensitivity 
• Dry eye and lacrimal disease that may interfere with lens wear 
• Eyelid abnormality 
• Allergic disease that may affect lens wear 
• Living environments constantly exposed to dryness 
• Living environments liable to eye contamination with dust or drugs 
• Other diseases inappropriate for lens wear 
 
[2] Information on Safety for DT1MF  
Information on device deficiency and adverse events stated in direction for use of DT1MF is described below: 
Deficiency/Adverse events 
The following deficiency and adverse events may occur: 
(1) Device Deficiency 
Lens: Tear, scratch, deformation, discoloration 
(2) Adverse events 
Corneal ulcer, corneal abscess, corneal perforation, corneal infiltration, corneal erosion, keratitis, Corneal 
epithelial disorders including corneal epithelial staining, corneal edema, corneal neovascularization, 
conjunctivitis(including allergic conjunctivitis and giant papillary conjunctivitis), subconjunctival 
hemorrhage, iritis, hordeolum, meibomitis, chalazion, accommodative asthenopia, dry eye, and decreased 
corneal endothelial cells, photosensitivity reaction(photophobia), rainbows and aureole around light 
 
[3] Information on Safety for AMMF 
Information on device deficiency and adverse events stated in direction for use of AMMF is described below: 
Deficiency/Adverse events 
The following deficiency and adverse events may occur: 
(1) Device Deficiency 
Lens: Tear, scratch, deformation, discoloration, foreign object, 2 lenses of more attached to each other 
in a layer 
Preservative solution and package: Leakage, discoloration/deterioration of liquid, breakage, 
contamination 
(2) Adverse events 
Corneal ulcer, corneal abscess, corneal perforation, corneal infiltration, corneal erosion, keratitis, Corneal 
epithelial disorders including corneal epithelial staining, corneal edema, corneal neovascularization, 
conjunctivitis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, iritis, hordeolum, meibomitis, chalazion, accommodative 
asthenopia, dry eye, and decreased corneal endothelial cells 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
9/39 Page 
 
 
2. STUDY OBJECTIVES 
The purpose of this clinical study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of DT1MF to AMMF for investigator-
graded successful lens centration in Japanese population. 
 
3. INVESTIGATIONAL PRODUCTS 
(1) INVESTIGATIONAL PRODUCTS 
Commercially available DTMF1 and AMMF products will be used in the study. A brief overview of the two 
investigational products is shown below. 
 
Name of investigational 
products 
DAILIES TOTAL 1® Multifocal 
1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist® (Multifocal) 
Approval number 
22900BZX00026000 
21600BZX00408000 
Manufacturing and 
Distribution company 
Alcon Japan Ltd. 
Johnson & Johnson K.K. 
Vision Care Company 
SCL IV Group 
Group I 
Group IV 
Material (USAN) 
Delefilcon A 
etafilcon A 
Water content [%] 
33 
58 
Base curve [mm] 
8.5 
8.4 
Diameter [mm] 
14.1 
14.3 
Center thickness [mm] 
(for -3.00D) 
0.09 
0.084 
Sphere power ranges [D] 
-10.00 to -0.25, ±0.00 to +5.00 
-9.00 to -0.25, ±0.00 to +5.00 
Add power ranges [D] 
+1.25D, +2.00D, +2.50D 
+1.25D, +1.75D, +2.50D 
Preservative solution 
Phosphate buffered saline 
Boric-acid buffered saline 
 
(2) Usage 
Follow each product’s direction for use. 
 
(3) Instructions on package and labeling 
In accordance with the instructions for commercially available DTMF1 and AMMF products. 
In order to keep the subject masked, the blister packages of the investigational products must be put in a seal 
to conceal the product name from the subjects before dispensing at each study site. 
 
(4) Storage and Management 
Commercially available products that are stored and managed by contact lens distributors will be used in this 
clinical study. The products will not be stored or managed at each study site. The site must get the products 
prescribed by the investigator, and dispense them with the seal that is described in (3) above. The dispensed study 
contact lenses will not have to be retrieved even in the case of used or unused. As an exception, DT1MF with any 
device deficiencies should be retrieved from the subject and returned to the Sponsor if at all possible. 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
10/39 Page 
 
 
4. SUBJECTS 
(1) No. of Subjects 
120 subjects required: 1 eye per 1 subject 
134 subjects planned 
 
(2) Inclusion Criteria 
1) Age 40 or older and must sign the informed consent. 
2) Habitual multifocal soft/ silicone hydrogel contact lenses wearers. 
3) Requiring a near spectacle ADD of +0.50D to +2.50D (inclusive) 
4) Requiring lenses within the power range of the dispensed study contact to be fitted (+5.00 to - 9.00 D). 
5) Cylinder if present less than1.00D in either eyes at Visit 1.  
6) Vision correctable to 20/30 or 0.2 logMAR or better in each eye at distance.  
7) Can be successfully fitted with study lenses at Visit 1, for parameter optimization and fitting. 
8) Willing to wear lenses every day or at least for a minimum of ten days in this clinical study for six hours per 
day, and attend all study visits. 
 
[Rationale for inclusion criteria] 
1) and 6): Required per ISO11980: 2012; 4.2.1.1., a) 
2) Avoid any adaptation bias for efficacy 
 variables. 
3) To select subjects who are currently correcting myopia. 
4) Study contact lenses must be available for both brands tested. 
5) The study products are not designed to correct astigmatism. 
7) To represent the normal clinical situation. 
8) To ensure that the study contact lenses are the principal correction modality. 
 
(3) Exclusion Criteria 
1) Currently wearing DAILIES TOTAL 1® Multifocal or 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist® Multifocal. 
2) Ocular anterior segment infection, inflammation, abnormality, or active disease that would contraindicate 
contact lens wear. 
3) Use of systemic or ocular medications which contact lens wear could be contraindicated as determined by the 
investigator.  
Subjects using systemic medications that could contribute to dry eye [antihistamines (oral or nasal), 
antidepressants (oral), retinoids (oral or topical), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (topical) and niacin 
(oral)] may not be enrolled in the study unless they have been on a stable dosing regimen for a minimum 
of 30 days prior to the study visit.4) Monocular subjects (only one eye with functional vision) or 
subjects fit with only one lens. 
5) Subjects fitted with monovision. 
6) Any moderate or severe ocular condition observed during the slit-lamp examination at enrollment visit. 
7) Prior refractive surgery (e.g. LASIK, PRK, etc). 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
11/39 Page 
 
 
8) History of herpetic keratitis, ocular surgery or irregular cornea. 
9) A pathological dry eye that precludes contact lens wear. 
10) Use of mechanical eyelid therapy or eyelid scrubs within 14 days before Visit 1 and not willing to discontinue 
during the study. 
11) Eye injury or surgery within twelve weeks immediately prior to enrollment for this trial. 
12) Enrollment of the investigator or his/her staff, family members of the investigator, family members of the 
investigator’s staff, or individuals living in the households of these individuals. 
13) Participation in any clinical trial within 30 days of the enrollment visit. 
14) Patient who is judged ineligible as patients in this clinical study by the investigator. 
 
[Rationale for exclusion criteria] 
1) and 12): To prevent bias. 
2), 3), 7), 9), 11) and 13): As per ISO 11980:2012; 4.2.1.1.b 
4) Bilateral wear required. 
5) Monovision may affect the quality of vision and could confound efficacy assessments. 
6) Abnormal findings would contraindicate lens wear. 
8) As per ISO 11980:2012; 4.2.1.1. 
10) This may interfere with efficacy assessments. 
14) This criterion was established for general safety considerations. 
 
5. STUDY DESIGN 
Prospective Multi-Center, Randomized*1, Single Masked (Subject), Crossover study. 
 
6. STUDY PROCEDURE 
(1) Outline 
Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the two sequences of the investigational products (DT1MF and 
AMMF) and will wear each of the two investigational products in both eyes for at least 11 days each. Randomization 
manager will create the randomization code for the orders of the investigational product wearing (DT1MF→AMMF 
or AMMF→DT1MF) at a ratio of 1:1 using the permuted block method. The randomization manager will create 
the randomization code for the study eye (right or left) and maintain the key code in a masked state *2, until the time 
of code breaking. 
 
 
 
                                                        
*1: The sequence of study lens use (DT1MF→AMMF, AMMF→DT1MF) is randomized in this study. 
The subjects wear the same lens in both eyes. 
*2: The randomization code for sequence of study lens use will be masked only to the subjects. The randomization 
code for the study eye must be masked for the site, the subjects and sponsor. 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
12/39 Page 
 
 
(2) Examinations Schedule 
Table Examinations Schedule 
Procedure/ Assessment 
Visit 1 
Visit 2*1 
Visit 3*1 
Un- 
scheduled 
Visit 
Baseline 
Disp. CL 1 
Follow Up 
CL 1 
Disp. CL 2 Follow up CL 
2 
Informed consent 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics [Gender, age, habitual 
multifocal SCL/SHCL (product name, 
diopter, the average number of hours of 
wear per day, the average number of 
days of wear per week)] 
 
 
*2 
 
*2 
 
Medical history/ Concurrent disease/ 
Concomitant medications 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Objective refraction 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corneal curvature radius (K value) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subjective refraction 
 
 
 
 
 
 
VA 
Best corrected visual acuity with 
trial frame 
 
 
 
 
 
[] 
Biomicroscope: Slit-lamp examination 
*3 
 
*3 
 
*3 
[*3] 
CL parameter selection 
 
 
 
 
 
[] 
Study lenses dispensing*4 
 
 
 
 
 
[] 
Lens centration assessment 
 
 
 
 
 
[] 
Verify inclusion/exclusion criteria 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adverse events, Device Deficiencies 
*6 
 
 
 
 
 
[]: To conduct examinations/observations as needed 
*1: Allowance for next visit: the day after 14 ± 3 days from the present visit. 
*2: Confirm frequency of Lens 1 or Lens 2 wear (average number of hours per day, number of total days). 
*3: Including observations of fluorescein corneal and conjunctival staining. 
*4: Record information of dispensed CL (DT1MF or AMMF) diopter, and lot number. 
: 
 
*6: Document the untoward event that occurred from getting informed consent to the use of the investigational products. 
 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
13/39 Page 
 
 
(3) Method of subject enrollment 
A flow of subject enrollment is shown below. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1) Subject information and informed consent 
After an explanation of the study details is given to a prospective subject, his/her consent to participate in the 
study will be obtained. 
 
2) Assignment of subject identification code 
The subject identification code will be assigned to a subject assessed to be eligible for the study. 
 
3) Eligibility screening 
The investigator will assess the eligibility of the subject through examinations and observations needed to assess 
the eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria (eligibility screening). 
 
4) Notification to the enrollment registration center  
Information of the subject whose eligibility is confirmed will be sent by fax or other means to the registration 
center. The center will send back the randomization form, which indicates the sequence of contact lens dispensing 
(DT1MF→AMMF or AMMF→DT1MF). 
 
5) Examinations/observations 
Examinations and observations will be performed as specified after Section 6 “Study Procedure”, (4) 
“Examinations Procedure 2) Visit1: “At dispensing Lens 1”. 
 
(4) Examinations Procedure 
To conduct the following examinations at Visit 1, Visit 2 and visit 3. The tests that are generally performed when 
Informed consent 
Assignment of subject identification code 
Eligibility screening 
To send an enrollment registration document to center 
Examinations/observations 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
14/39 Page 
 
 
prescribing contact lenses can be used as data for clinical study even if such data are from the tests performed before 
obtaining informed consent. The sequence of the examination procedures can be changed at this clinical study sites. 
CL parameter selection will be followed each manufacturer’s recommended fitting guide. 
 
1) Visit 1: Baseline visit  
[1] After giving a full explanation of the study details to each subject, the investigator will obtain voluntary 
written informed consent from the subject. The subject identification code will be assigned to a subject 
assessed to be eligible for the study. 
[2] Collect the information on subject demographics (gender, age, habitual multifocal SCL/SHCL 
information [brand name, sphere and add powers, average number of hours of wear per day and the 
average number of days of wear per week]), ocular medical history (up to 12 weeks before informed 
consent), ocular surgery history, complication, and concomitant medications. 
[3] As subjective questionnaires, provide the subject with “Subject Questionnaire Forms” (for wearing 
habitual multifocal SCL/SHCL) and collect the forms within a day after the subject completes the 
questionnaires at the study site. 
[4] Measure binocular VA at 5m, 70cm and 30cm when wearing habitual multifocal SCL/SHCL. 
[5] Perform refractometry and keratometry to measure objective refraction and corneal curvature radius. 
Perform subjective refraction to measure best corrected visual acuity with an ophthalmoscope. 
[6] Assess fluorescein corneal and conjunctival staining by slit-lamp microscopy according to Section 6-
(5) “Evaluation Method” (5) “Corneal staining” and Section6-(5) “Evaluation Method”, 6) 
“Conjunctival staining” 
[7] Select the parameters for investigational product 1 (Lens 1) and investigational product 2 (Lens 2) (lens 
centration 
 assessment (according to Section 6-(5) “Evaluation method” (1) “Lens Centration” 
 
) 
[8] Confirm the presence or absence of adverse events and device deficiencies. If any adverse event and/or 
device deficiencies is present, record data on the event in the Adverse Event CRF according to Section 
10 “Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies, etc.” of the protocol. The already existing symptoms and 
diseases at obtaining informed consent are regarded as complications. The events that are developed 
anew or aggravated after informed consent are recorded as adverse events. 
[9] If the subject is assessed to be eligible for the study based on these examination results and the inclusion 
and exclusion criteria, information on the subject will be sent to the registration center by fax or other 
means. 
[10] Receive the randomization form for the sequence of contact lens dispensing from the registration 
center by fax or other means. 
 
2) Visit 1: Disp. CL 1 
[1] Observe the ocular anterior segment with Lens 1 by slit-lamp microscopy. 
[2] Assess lens centration 
 (10-15 min post insertion) for Lens 1 by slit-lamp microscopy 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
15/39 Page 
 
 
according to Section 6-(5) “Evaluation Method”, 1) “Lens centration” 
 
 
[3] If any specification adjustment is required, repeat the procedures from [1] to [3] above. 
[4] 
 
[5] Confirm information on the dispensed Lens 1 (type, diopter and lot number). 
[6] Confirm the presence or absence of adverse events and device deficiencies. If any adverse event and/or 
device deficiencies is present, record data on the event in the Adverse Event CRF according to Section 
10 “Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies, etc.” of the protocol. 
[7] Schedule the next visit (Visit 2) date. Dispense necessary number of Lens 1 to the subject. Instruct the 
subject to contact the investigator, etc. if he/she feels any abnormality. If lens has any device 
deficiencies, let the subject bring it on Visit 2. 
 
3)  Visit 2: Follow up CL1 
[1] Confirm the time of Lens 1 insertion and the start and end times of examinations on the visit day (and 
document these times in the medical record). 
[2] Confirm the change of concomitant medications, etc. 
[3] Confirm whether Lens 1 is used appropriately during the period between the last and present visits 
(total days of Lens 1 wearing, average of wearing time per day. If subjects visit the clinic without 
wearing Lens 1, confirm the reason). 
 
 
  
 
 
 
[7] Assess lens centration
 for Lens 1 by slit-lamp microscopy according to Section 6-(5) 
“Evaluation Method”, 1) “Lens centration” 
 
 
[8] Remove Lens 1, and assess fluorescein corneal and conjunctival staining by slit-lamp microscopy 
according to Section 6-(5) “Evaluation Method” 5)“Corneal staining” and Section6-(5) “Evaluation 
Method”, 6) “Conjunctival staining” 
[9] Measure best corrected visual acuity with trial frame. 
[10] Confirm the presence or absence of adverse events and device deficiencies with reference to subjective 
questionnaire answers. If any adverse event and/or device deficiencies is present, record data on the 
event in the Adverse Event CRF according to Section 10 “Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies, 
etc.” of the protocol. 
 
4) 
Visit 2 Disp. CL 2 
[1] Observe the ocular anterior segment with Lens 2 by slit-lamp microscopy. 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
16/39 Page 
 
 
[2] Assess lens centration 
 (10-15 min post insertion) for Lens 2 by slit-lamp microscopy 
according to Section 6-(5) “Evaluation Method”, 1) “Lens centration” 
 
 
[3] If any replacement in specification is required, repeat the procedures from 1 to 3 above. 
 
[5] Confirm information on the dispensed Lens 2 (type, diopter and lot number). 
[6] Confirm the presence or absence of adverse events and device deficiencies. If any adverse event and/or 
device deficiencies is present, record data on the event in the Adverse Event CRF according to Section 
10 “Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies, etc.” of the protocol. 
[7] Check the date of the next visit (Visit 3), and tell the subject to bring habitual multifocal SCL/SHCL 
or glasses when follow up visit. Dispense necessary number of Lens 2 to the subject. Instruct the subject 
to contact the investigator, etc. if he/she feels any abnormality. If lens has any device deficiencies, let 
the subject bring it on Visit 2. 
 
5) Visit3: Follow up CL2 
[1] Confirming the time of Lens 2 insertion and the start and end times of examinations on the visit day 
(and document these times in the medical record). 
[2] Confirm the change of concomitant medications, etc. 
[3] Confirm whether Lens 2 is used appropriately during the period between the last and present visits 
(total days of Lens 2 wearing, average of wearing time per day). If subjects visit the clinic without 
wearing Lens 2, confirm the reason. 
 
 
  
 
 
 
[7] Assess lens centration 
 for Lens 2 by slit-lamp microscopy according to Section 6-(5) 
“Evaluation Method”, 1) “Lens centration” 
 
 
[8] Remove Lens 2, and assess fluorescein corneal and conjunctival staining by slit-lamp microscopy 
according to Section 6-(5) “Evaluation Method”, (5) “Corneal staining” and Section6-(5) “Evaluation 
Method”, (6) “Conjunctival staining” 
[9] Measure best corrected visual acuity with trial frame. 
[10] Confirm the presence or absence of adverse events and device deficiencies with reference to subjective 
questionnaire answers. If any adverse event and/or device deficiencies is present, record data on the 
event in the Adverse Event CRF according to Section 10 “Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies, 
etc.” of the protocol. 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
17/39 Page 
 
 
6) Unscheduled Visit (To conduct examinations as needed) 
[1] At unscheduled visit resulting from adverse events, etc., confirm the reason for visit and procedures 
taken during the visit. 
[2] Identify the type of the study lens used by the subject. 
[3] Perform examinations, assessments, or confirmations considered necessary by the investigator among 
those listed below: 
 
Best corrected visual acuity with trial frame 
 
 
 
Lens centration 
 
 
Slit-lamp microscopy examination (including sodium fluorescein corneal, etc.). 
 
Information on the investigational products (diopter and lot number), if changed 
 
 
[4] Dispense the required number of the study lens to the subject, as needed. 
[5] Confirm the presence or absence of adverse events. If any adverse event is present, confirm the items 
in the Adverse Event CRF according to Section 10 “Adverse Events and Device Deficiencies, etc.” of 
the protocol. 
 
(5) Evaluation Method 
1) Lens centration 
Assess lens centration for each eye by slit-lamp microscopy according to the criteria shown below. 
For assessment results other than “Optimal”, check the direction of lens decentration (upward, downward, 
nasal, or temporal). 
 
Criteria 
0 
Centered/ Optimal 
1 
Slight decentration 
2 
Mild decentration (without limbal touch) 
3 
Moderate decentration (with limbal touch but without corneal exposure) 
4 
Severe decentration (with corneal exposure) 
 
2) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
18/39 Page 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
19/39 Page 
 
 
 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
20/39 Page 
 
 
 
4) Fluorescein corneal and conjunctival staining 
Corneal and conjunctival staining with fluorescein of both eyes will be rated by the investigator using a 5 
point scale (0= Normal, 1= Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe). 
Corneal staining with fluorescein (EFRON GRADING) 
 
 
 
0: Normal 
 
1: Trace 
 
2: Mild 
 
3: Moderate 
 
4: Severe 
 
Conjunctival staining with fluorescein (EFRON GRADING) 
 
0: Normal 
1: Trace 
2: Mild 
3: Moderate 
4: Severe 
 
 
 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
21/39 Page 
 
 
 
(6) Anticipated study period 
From NOVEMBER 2017 to OCTOBER 2018 
 
7. CONCOMITANT THERAPY 
(1) Contraindicated drugs 
Subjects will be prohibited from using the following drugs and all ophthalmic drugs including over-the-counter 
products (except artificial tears) during the period from study enrollment through the end of all examinations and 
observations. 
If a subject is administered the following drugs, their dosage and administration must not be changed during 
the period from study enrollment through the end of all examinations and observations. 
Antihistamines (oral or nasal), antidepressants (oral), retinoids (oral or topical), nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (topical) and niacin (oral). 
 
(2) Contraindicated therapy 
Surgical therapies affecting the ocular surface, such as intraocular surgery and ophthalmic laser surgery, are 
prohibited as concomitant therapies during the study period. Subjects considered requiring these surgical 
therapies should be withdrawn from the study and be treated appropriately. 
 
8. DISCONTINUED SUBJECTS 
(1) Discontinued Subjects 
Subjects discontinued the study in the following cases: 
1) Upon onset of adverse events which make study continuation difficult. 
2) If the investigators judge it necessary to switch the therapy to another 
3) The investigators judge to discontinue the study as deviation from inclusion and/or exclusion criteria after 
using the investigational products which has a problem in safety. 
4) Upon cancellation of consent to the study by the subject. 
5) Upon request of the subject to discontinue the study. 
6) Hospital referral or move of the subject during the study, making it difficult to continue the study. 
7) The use of ophthalmic drugs including over-the-counter products (except artificial tears) during the period 
from study enrollment through the end of all examinations and observations. 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
22/39 Page 
 
 
8) This was ineligible due to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. 
9) If the investigators judge it necessary to discontinue the study. 
 
Upon discontinuation of the study, if the investigators decided the examination or observation is necessary, the 
examination or observation should be carried out as far as possible under the subject’s consent, and the date and 
reason of discontinuation are entered in the case report form. 
In case where continuation of the study is difficult because of discontinued visit of the subject to the clinic, the 
subject is followed over telephone, by mail or other appropriate means and the reason for discontinued visit, 
survival/death of the subject, presence/absence of adverse events, etc., are entered in the case report form. 
 
(2) Discontinuation of the entire study 
If discontinuation of the entire study has become inevitable for reasons of reports on serious safety information 
from any participating study site or overseas, problems pertaining to the quality of the test articles, and so on, the 
Sponsor is required to immediately inform the investigator and the head of each study site of discontinuation of 
the study and its reason in writing. 
 
9. ANALYSIS PLAN 
(1) Evaluability 
Evaluability of subjects and data will be determined before breaking masked key code and before locking the 
database lock. 
1) Safety 
The pre-treatment safety analysis set will include all subjects who consented to participate in the study. The 
pre-treatment safety analysis set will be the set that will be used to summarize occurrence of adverse 
experiences prior to exposure to the investigational products except for trial-fit lenses used at Visit 1. The 
treatment-emergent safety analysis set will include all eyes exposed to any investigational product 
evaluated in this study except for trial-fit lenses which is used at Visit 1. 
 
2) Full Analysis Set(FAS) 
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all randomized subjects who are exposed to any investigational 
product except for trial-fit lenses which is used at Visit 1 and who complete at least 1 scheduled study visit. 
 
3) Per Protocol Set(PPS) 
The Per Protocol Analysis Set (PPS) includes all randomized subjects who are exposed to any 
investigational product except for trial-fit lenses which is used at Visit 1, who complete at least 1 scheduled 
study visit and who meet all inclusion criteria and do not meet any exclusion criteria. 
 
The FAS and PPS will be used for primary efficacy analysis in the study. The FAS will be used for main 
results of primary efficacy analysis. 
. The adverse 
experiences which occur in the period between informed consent and before exposure to the investigational 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
23/39 Page 
 
 
products will be analyzed by using data of subjects who consented to participate. The safety analysis after 
exposure to any investigational product will be performed with the Safety analysis set. 
 
(2) Demographic factors and baseline characteristics 
For demographic factors (gender, age [40-49 years,50-59 years, 60-69 years, ≥70 years], type of habitual 
disposable multifocal SCL/SHCL, ocular medical history, concurrent diseases, and concomitant medications), 
the number and percentage of subjects will be calculated for all data sets (Safety Analysis Set, FAS, and PPS). 
For age, diopter of habitual disposable  multifocal SCL/SHCL, average number of hours of wear per day and 
the average number of days of wear per week of habitual disposable multifocal SCL/SHCL, average number of 
hours of wear per day and total wearing days of investigational products, corneal curvature radius (keratometry), 
objective refraction (refractometry), subjective refraction (spherical equivalent), best corrected visual acuity with 
trial frame, and diopter of dispensed lenses, descriptive statistics (arithmetic mean, standard deviation, number 
of subjects, median, minimum, and maximum) will be calculated. 
 
(3) Efficacy analysis 
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority in investigator-graded successful lens 
centration of DT1MF to AMMF after 14 ± 3 days of wearing. The primary efficacy analysis will be performed 
on the right or left eye that is randomly selected as a single study eye. 
  
1) Primary analysis 
The primary endpoint of this study is investigator-graded successful lens centration of “Optimal” after 14±3 
days of wearing. 
 
[1] Statistical hypotheses 
The null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1) for the primary analysis are defined as follows: 
 
H0 : 𝜋𝜋(𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷1) −𝜋𝜋(𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴) ≤−10% 
H1 : 𝜋𝜋(𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷1) −𝜋𝜋(𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴) > −10% 
 
Where 𝜋𝜋(𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷1)and 𝜋𝜋(𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴) denote the percentage of subjects rated as “Optimal” in the DT1MF and 
AMMF groups, respectively. The 10% is the non-inferiority margin. 
 
[2] Method of analysis 
 The number and percentage of subjects rated as “Optimal” in investigator-graded lens centration 
assessment (after 14±3 day of wearing) by each investigational product will be summarized, and a 
difference between two investigational products will be estimated by using confidence interval based on 
corresponding binomial test. Non-inferiority of DT1MF to AMMF will be demonstrated in case the lower 
one-sided 97.5% confidence limit of a difference between investigational lenses lies above -10%. If the 
crossover effect (DT1MF→AMMF vs AMMF→DT1MF) and/or the period effect (Visit 2 vs. Visit 3) are 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
24/39 Page 
 
 
found to be significant, DT1MF vs AMMF will be compared at each sequence and/or period separately. 
Only if non-inferiority of DT1MF to AMMF is demonstrated, superiority of DT1MF over AMMF will 
be tested. Superiority will be demonstrated when the lower one-sided 97.5% confidence limit for 
investigational lens difference lies above 0%. P-value for McNemar test is also calculated. Non-inferiority 
and superiority hypothetical tests in above are based on the closed testing procedure; no adjustment of 
significance level for each test will be made. 
 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
25/39 Page 
 
 
 
 
(4) Handling of missing data 
 No imputation is planned for missing data. 
 
(5) Multiplicity 
 Primary analysis will be performed a single variable, and superiority testing will be performed only when 
non-inferiority testing is demonstrated. 
 
 For defining the sequence 
of statistical testing in advance, the type I family-wise error (FWE) rate of 
hypothesis tests which include 
primary efficacy analyses 
 is controlled at alpha = 2.5% (one-
sided). 
 
 
(6) Safety analysis 
 The number and percentage of adverse events and adverse experiences which occur in the period between 
informed consent and before exposure to the investigational products will be presented. For the following 
variables, observed values and their changes from baseline will be summarized. Continuous variables will be 
presented descriptive statistics (arithmetic mean, standard deviation, number of subjects, median, minimum, and 
maximum), whereas categorical variables will be presented the number and percentage. 
• 
Slit-lamp examination 
• 
Best corrected visual acuity with trial frame 
 
(7) Medical economics analysis 
No medical economics analysis is planned in the study. 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
26/39 Page 
 
 
(8) Interim analysis 
No interim analysis is planned in the study. 
 
(9) Rationale for the sample size 
 The sample size was estimated based on a subgroup analysis from a prior clinical study (CLE914-P001 study) 
in which 54 eyes were from habitual current AMMF wearers. In terms of investigator-graded lens centration after 
14±3 days of wearing, a difference was showed that DT1MF had 13.0% better percentage of “Optimal” than 
AMMF (See the table below). 
 
Table  Lens centration assessment by investigator (14±3 days of wearing) (CLE914-P001, Unit: Eye) 
  
AMMF 
Difference between 
investigational 
device 
(DT1MF – AMMF) 
Optimal 
Other than 
Optimal 
Total 
DT1MF 
Optimal 
45 
7 
52 
7 
83.3% 
13.0% 
96.3% 
13. 0% 
Other than 
Centered/ Optimal 
0 
2 
2 
  
0% 
3.7% 
3.7% 
Total 
45 
9 
54 
83.3% 
16.7% 
100% 
 
With 120 subjects (one study eye per one subject), the probability that a lower limit of 97.5% one-sided 
confidence interval of lens difference lies above -10% is more than 99% and the probability of lens difference 
lying above 0% is 92%, assuming the percentage of "Optimal" in population is the same as in the table above. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
27/39 Page 
 
 
 
 
 
As the 120 patients are required for the effectiveness assessment in this study, the 134 patients will be enrolled 
in order to assume around 10 % discontinuation. 
 
10. ADVERSE EVENTS and DEVICE DEFICIENCIES, etc. 
Adverse events will be collected from the time of informed consent even if the investigational product isn’t 
allocated. 
 
(1) General Information 
Refer to the Glossary of Terms below for categories of AEs and SAEs. 
 
Adverse Event (AE): 
Any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including 
abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects after signed informed consent, users or other persons, whether 
or not related to the investigational medical device (test article). For subjects, this definition includes 
events related to the test article or the procedures involved. For users or other persons, this definition is 
restricted to events related to the test article. 
 
Serious Adverse Event: 
Adverse event that led to any of the following, or that needed treatment not to lead to the following results: 
• 
Death. 
• 
A serious deterioration in the health of the subject that either resulted in: 
a) a life-threatening illness or injury. 
Note: Life-threatening means that the individual was at immediate risk of death from the event as it 
occurred, ie, it does not include an event which hypothetically might have caused death had it 
occurred in a more severe form. 
b) any potentially sight-threatening event or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body 
function. 
c) in-patient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. 
Note: Planned hospitalization for a pre-existing condition, without serious deterioration in health, 
is not considered a serious adverse event. In general, hospitalization signifies that the individual 
remained at the hospital or emergency ward for observation and/or treatment (usually involving an 
overnight stay) that would not have been appropriate in the physician's office or an out- patient 
setting. Complications that occur during hospitalization are adverse events. If a complication 
prolongs hospitalization or fulfills any other serious criteria, the event is serious. When in doubt as 
to whether “hospitalization” occurred, the event should be considered serious. 
d) a congenital anomaly/birth defect, 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
28/39 Page 
 
 
e) a medically important event or reaction. 
 
Non-serious Adverse Event 
Adverse event that does not meet the criteria for a serious adverse event. 
 
Adverse Device Effect (ADE) 
Adverse event related to the use of an investigational medical device (test article).   
Note: This definition includes adverse events resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, 
deployment, implantation, installation, or operation; any malfunction; and use error or intentional misuse of 
the test article. 
 
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) 
Adverse device effect that has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event. 
 
Device Deficiency 
Inadequacy of a medical device with respect to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, or performance. 
 
Safety Information: 
Information about quality, efficacy and safety for medical device and information which is needed for 
appropriate use, including: 
• Use error 
• Abnormal Use 
• Product tampering 
• Product counterfeiting 
• Product theft 
 
(2) Procedure for Reporting of serious adverse events (SAE 
The investigator will report the serious adverse event or the risk of causing serious adverse event to Alcon 
within 24 hours after confirming the event.  
After obtainment of detailed information on the serious adverse event, the investigator will prepare a report 
and immediately submit it to Alcon and the head of the medical institutions. 
 
Contact for emergent communication 
Alcon Japan Ltd. Clinical Development, CDMA & Regulatory Affairs, Japan.  
TEL 
 (At night and on holidays: 
) 
FAX 
 
 
When the SAE is correspond to “Death or a life-threatening ADE” or “Serious and unexpected ADE other 
than Death or a life-threatening event”, the sponsor will immediately notify them to heads of all medical 
institutions and all investigators by document. 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
29/39 Page 
 
 
(3) Report of adverse events and evaluation of the causal relationship 
All adverse events (related and unrelated to the medical device) will be documented on the Adverse Event 
Case Report Form (CRF). 
AEs will be sorted into the investigational product by the following periods (Onset time of AE), because this 
study is cross-over design.  
Periods: Onset time of AE 
investigational product 
Informed consent to Visit 1: baseline 
N/A 
Visit 1: Dispensing Lens 1 to Visit 2: Follow Up Lens1 
Lens 1 
Visit 2: Dispensing Lens 2 to Visit 3: Follow Up Lens2 
Lens 2 
 
(4) Intensity Assessment of Adverse Events 
For every AE, the investigator must assess the intensity (severity). Events should be classified as mild, 
moderate, or severe. These classifications should be based on the following definitions: 
Intensity: 
Mild  
An AE is mild if the subject is aware of but can easily tolerate the sign or symptom.  
Moderate  
An AE is moderate if the sign or symptom results in discomfort significant enough to 
cause interference with the subject’s usual activities.  
Severe  
An AE is severe if the sign or symptom is incapacitating and results in the subject’s 
inability to work or engage in their usual activities. 
 
(5) Follow-up of Subjects / Subjects with Adverse Events 
In the event of acknowledging any adverse events, the investigators should immediately take appropriate 
actions irrespective of the presence or absence of causal relationship with the test article. And the investigators 
will make a follow-up of the adverse event if it is possible. When the subject needs medical treatment, the 
investigators should inform the subject of the matter.  
For subjects who are experiencing ongoing unresolved adverse events at the time of their study completion 
or early discontinuation from the study, it is recommended that the investigator schedule an appropriate follow-
up visit in order to determine the outcome of the event. 
 
(6) Pregnancy of subjects 
Women who is planning to become pregnant during this study period or women who are pregnant at the time 
of study entry are excluded from participation 
 
(7) Provision of safety information 
Investigators provide safety information which is needed to make a detailed report on demand from the sponsor. 
 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
30/39 Page 
 
 
11. ETHICS 
(1) Ethics committee 
Prior to the start of the study, the Independent ethics committee (IEC) of each participating institution is 
required to inspect and evaluate the planned study as to the acceptability of implementing the study, 
appropriateness of the contents of the protocol, case report form, questionnaire and informed consent document, 
and other matters related to the study from the ethical, scientific points of view, with an ultimate goal of protecting 
the human rights and welfare of the subjects. 
The inspection and examination by the IEC may be performed again also during a certain period of time after 
the start of the study or when the head of the participating institution sees the necessity of additional 
inspection/examination so that the study may be monitored continuously. 
 
(2) Ethical consideration 
The study is implemented after a contract on implementation of the study is concluded between the Sponsor 
and each participating institution following inspection and authorization of the study by the IEC of each 
participating institution. 
If deemed necessary to ensure safe implementation of the study, the protocol of this study may be revised in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in “Section 12. PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS”. 
This study is carried out in accordance with the principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki and the 
protocol. This study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the Ethical 
Guidelines for Clinical Studies (2014, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and 
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No.3, partial revision on 28 February, 2017), in principle. 
 
(3) Protection of subjects’ privacy 
To protect the privacy of individual subjects, only identification codes are used to represent the subjects whose 
data are used in case reports, etc., so that leakage of the identifiable individual information about the subjects can 
be prevented. 
 
(4) Specifications to secure safety of study subjects 
1) Actions to take for adverse events 
In the event of acknowledging any adverse events, the investigator or the sub-investigator should immediately 
take appropriate actions irrespective of the presence or absence of causal relationship with the test article. 
2) Supply of new information 
In the case of obtaining safety-related new and significant information related to the clinical trial, the sponsor 
should supply the information in writing to the investigator and the sub-investigator and the head of the study site 
and take necessary actions. 
3) Avoiding emergent risks 
In the event of deviating from the study protocol to avoid the emergent risk and secure safety of the study 
subject or because of other unavoidable clinical reasons, the investigator will retain the record and submit the 
documentation and justification of the protocol deviation to the sponsor and the head of the study site. 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
31/39 Page 
 
 
(5) Compensation for health hazards 
If any subject has sustained health hazards arising from this study, best healthcare is provided to that subject. 
The Sponsor needs to be covered by insurance for liability arising from clinical trial. 
 
(6) Payment to subjects 
As a reward to the cooperation of each subject with the study, the Sponsor pays an amount of money, 
predetermined through negotiation with each participating medical institution, to each subject. This payment is 
not intended to force any subject to remain in the study. 
 
12. PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS 
When the protocol, etc. are revised, the sponsor and the investigator will exchange an agreement in writing. 
The revised protocol, etc. will be reviewed and approved by the IEC of the medical institution before new subjects 
are enrolled, depending on the necessity. 
 
13. CONSIDERATIONS FOR DOCUMENTATION AND COMPLETION OF CASE 
REPORT FORM 
The investigator, etc. will complete the case report form by himself or herself based on source data in 
accordance with the protocol and the preparation procedure of the case report form. After preparation of the case 
report form, he or she will sign and date it, and submit it to the sponsor through the person in charge of monitoring.  
The investigator will describe the subjective questionnaires regarding the name of the site and identification 
code and submit it as a part of CRFs to the sponsor through the person in charge of monitoring. 
 
14. MONITORING 
The Sponsor will designate a monitor to conduct the appropriate site visits at the appropriate intervals. The 
clinical investigation will be monitored to ensure that: 
1. The rights and well-being of the subjects are protected. 
2. The reported data are accurate, complete, and verifiable from the source documents. 
3. The study is conducted in compliance with the current approved protocol (and amendment[s], if 
applicable), with current Good Clinical Practices (GCPs), Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Studies and 
with applicable regulatory requirements, in principle.  
The monitor will report the monitoring results to study manager. 
 
15. RETENTION OF THE RECORDS 
The following records of this study are properly maintained. Sponsor informs medical institutions when the 
date to maintain the records has expired. 
Medical institutions and investigators shall preserve the protocol, source documents, informed consent forms 
agreed, informed consent form and other written information, records on GCP and Ethical Guidelines for Clinical 
Studies (2014, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and Ministry of Health, Labour 
and Welfare Notification No.3). Above documents excluding medical records should be retained either five years 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
32/39 Page 
 
 
after the date of completion of the study, or three years after the date of publication/presentation of the final study 
result whichever date is later. The storage period of clinical record depends on Medical Practitioners Act and 
other related regulations. 
 
16. CONFIDENTIALITY AND PUBLICATION OF STUDY 
All information related to this clinical study including the protocol and therapeutic results are the property 
of the sponsor, and the investigator and other medical staff engaged in the clinical study must keep such 
information confidential. 
The sponsor can submit the results of this clinical study to the health authority and use the results as 
“Information on Proper Use” of the product. Sponsor will resister the summary of the study to open database 
(The Database Center of the National University Hospitals, JAPIC Clinical Trials Information, or JMACCT 
Clinical Trials Registry, etc.) before conducting the study, and will properly update it based on the revision of 
the protocol or study progression. 
After completion of the study, sponsor and the primary investigators will report the result of the study after 
taking necessary steps for protecting the rights and benefits of the subjects, related persons, sponsor, investigators, 
and so on. When publishing the results of this clinical study in the congresses or medical journals, the investigators 
and other medical staff must pre-inform the sponsor. The sponsor can confirm the contents of presentation 
beforehand. 
 
17. DIRECT ACCESS TO SOURCE DATA AND DOCUMENTS 
The investigator and the study site must make source data available to the sponsor or the regulatory authority 
at their request. Such direct access to source data will be performed so that the sponsor or the regulatory authority 
may confirm whether the clinical study is conducted in accordance with the protocol and whether data of the case 
report form are indicated accurately. 
Regarding the sujective questionnaires, “Subject Questionnaire Forms” is the source data. With reference to 
Evaluation and Comment of the investigator, etc., there are no source data and they are information directly 
indicated on the case report form. 
 
18. QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF THE STUDY 
Quality control and Quality assurance shall be carried out in accordance with GCP standard operational 
procedures (SOP) and Quality assurance SOP of the Sponsor. 
Quality Assurance will evaluate that the study is properly conducted according to the protocol, Standard 
Operation Procedures of Medical Affairs/ Clinical Development Group / Clinical Biometrics, GCP and Ethical 
Guidelines for Clinical Studies (2014, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and 
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No.3). 
 
19. OBLIGATIONS OF INVESTIGATORS 
Selection of Trial Subjects 
In the selection of trial subjects, investigator(s) and sub-investigators shall, from the standpoint of human rights 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
33/39 Page 
 
 
and on the basis of the standards for selection and exclusion set forth in the trial protocol(s), carefully consider 
whether to request participation in the trial, taking into consideration such factors as the subject’s general state of 
health, symptoms, age, gender, capacity to consent, dependency on investigator(s), etc., and participation in other 
trials. 
 
Obtaining Consent of Subjects 
Investigator(s) and sub-investigators shall obtain consent for the subject to participate in the trial from the subject 
or legally acceptable representative thereof, in accordance with GCP. 
 
Medical Treatment of Subjects 
The investigator shall have the responsibility for all decisions on medical treatment relating to the trial. 
The director of the institution and the investigator shall ensure that the subject is provided with adequate medical 
treatment for all trial-related adverse events that constitute clinical problems during and after the subject’s 
participation in the trial. Further, when an investigator or sub-investigator becomes aware of the need for medical 
treatment of an adverse event, he or she shall so inform the subject. 
The investigator or sub-investigator shall confirm whether the subject has another attending physician, and with 
the consent of the subject, inform the attending physician of trial participation. 
If a subject desires to withdraw or withdraws participation during the trial, the subject is not obliged to clarify the 
reason for withdrawal, but the investigator or sub-investigator shall make appropriate efforts, based on full respect 
for the rights of the subject, to determine the reason. 
 
Agreement on and Compliance with Trial Protocol(s) 
Prior to reaching an agreement with the sponsor on the trial protocol(s) and case report forms (CRF), the 
investigator shall confer with the sponsor on the basis of the trial protocol(s), and other required materials and 
information submitted by the sponsor, and shall give full consideration to the ethical and scientific suitability of 
conducting the trial. The same shall apply if the trial protocol(s) is revised. 
The investigator shall reach agreement with sponsor on the content of the trial protocol(s), and as evidence of 
agreement to comply with the trial protocol(s), the investigator and sponsor shall date and affix their signatures or 
personal seals to a trial protocol(s) or alternative document. The same shall apply if the trial protocol(s) is revised, 
or if, due to a directive of the director of the institution based on the opinion the IEC, the trial protocol(s) is corrected. 
 
Submission of Documents to the IEC 
Before and during the trial period, the investigator(s) shall keep current those documents that are subject to review 
by the IEC and are to be submitted by the investigator(s). If these documents are augmented, updates or revised, all 
must be submitted promptly to the director of the institution. 
 
Directive and Decisions of the Director of the Study site 
When the IEC gives its approval to conduct the trial on condition of certain revisions, and the investigator has 
been informed in writing of the directives and decisions of the director of the institution based thereon, the 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
34/39 Page 
 
 
investigator shall commence the trial in accordance with these directives and decisions. 
When the IEC gives its approval to continue a trial in progress or to continue a trial on condition of certain 
revisions, and the investigator has been informed in writing of the directives and decisions of the director of the 
institution based thereon, the investigator shall continue the trial in accordance with these directives and decisions. 
When the IEC cancels its approval to an item related to a trial in progress (including its termination or suspension) 
and the investigator has been informed in writing of the directives and decisions if the director of the institution 
based thereon, the investigator shall comply with these directives and decisions. 
 
Use, etc., of the investigational product(s) 
The investigator shall ensure that the investigational product(s) are used only in accordance with methods that 
comply with the approved trial protocol(s). 
 
Deviations etc. from Trial Protocol(s) 
The investigator or sub-investigator shall not undertake any deviation from or modification of the trial protocol(s) 
without prior written agreement between the investigator and the sponsor and written approval based on prior 
inspection by the IEC. This is not, however, applicable in the case of changes related solely to cases that are 
medically unavoidable in order to avoid imminent danger to the subject, or in the case of management matters (e.g., 
a change in telephone number). 
The investigator or sub-investigator shall keep a record of all actions deviating from the trial protocol(s). 
The investigator or sub-investigator shall prepare a record describing the reason(s) etc. therefore, submit the 
record regarding deviation to the sponsor in order to avoid imminent danger to the subject, and retain a copy. 
The investigator or sub-investigator may deviate or change the protocol without prior consent in writing with the 
sponsor or a prior approval from IEC for medically unavoidable reasons in order to avoid imminent danger to the 
subject. In this case, the investigator shall obtain approval for the deviation and change by submitting the contents 
and the reason of the deviation and change and the plan if the revision in the Protocol is appropriate to the Sponsor, 
the head of the medical institution and IEC via the head of the medical institution as promptly as reasonably possible, 
and obtain approval from the head of the medical institution and agreement from the sponsor via the head of the 
medical institution. 
 
Recording and Reporting the CRF 
The investigator or sub-investigator shall prepare CRFs and subjective questionnaires in accordance with the trial 
protocol(s), affix thereto his or her signature or personal seal, and submit them to the sponsor. The investigator shall 
retain copies of the CRFs and subjective questionnaires submitted. 
The investigator shall inspect CRFs prepared by sub-investigators prior to their submission to the sponsor, and 
upon confirming that there is no problem, affix thereto his or her signature or personal seal. The investigator shall 
also inspect modifications or revisions to CRFs undertaken by sub-investigators, and confirm that there is no 
problem. 
The investigator shall ensure that the data in the CRFs and all other documents submitted to the sponsor are 
accurate, complete, legible, and submitted in a timely manner, and that a subject identification code is used for 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
35/39 Page 
 
 
identifying subjects. 
Data in the CRFs that are based on original materials shall not conflict with the original materials. When there is 
any discrepancy with the original, the investigator shall prepare a record explaining the reason therefore, submit it 
to the sponsor, and retain a copy. 
In modifying or correcting CRFs, the investigator shall follow the manual provided by the sponsor. If there is any 
modification or correction whatever in a CRF, it must be dated and the signature or personal seal affixed. An 
explanation of the change must be provided if the change is critical. Further, the modification or correcting shall not 
be such as to render the initial writing unclear (i.e., an audit trail shall be maintained). 
The investigator should submit records of modification and correction of the case report form to the Sponsor and 
retain a photocopy of each record. 
 
Reports, etc. in the Course of the Trial 
In order to be available for ongoing review by the IEC, the investigator shall submit a written overview of the 
status of the trial to the director of the institution annually, or more frequently when requested by the IEC. 
With respect to any trial modification that could have a significant effect on the conduct of the trial or could 
increase the risk to subjects, the investigator shall promptly submit a written report to the sponsor, the director of 
the institution and, via the director of the institution, to the IEC. 
Except in cases in which the trial protocol(s), etc. provide that urgent notification is not required, the investigator 
shall notify the sponsor promptly of all serious adverse events. After the urgent notification, a detailed written report 
shall be made in due course. 
With respect to adverse events that are specified in the trial protocol(s) as serious for evaluation of the safety of 
the investigational product(s), the investigator shall report to the sponsor, observing the reporting requirements and 
deadlines set forth in the trial protocol(s). 
The investigator shall report all serious adverse events to the director of the institution promptly and in writing.  
With respect to serious adverse events or serious adverse device effects, including cases of death, the investigator 
shall submit to the sponsor, director of the institution or IEC any additional information (autopsy reports, final 
treatment records or other requisite information that they may request). 
 
Termination or Suspension of the Trial 
When for any reason the trial is terminated or suspended, the investigator shall notify the subjects promptly to 
that effect, and shall ensure that subjects receive appropriate medical treatment and post-treatment. 
When the investigator terminates or suspends the trial, the investigator shall notify the director of the institution 
promptly and in writing to that effect, and shall provide a detailed written explanation for the termination or 
suspension. 
 
Completion of the Trial 
When the trial is completed, the investigator shall notify the director of the institution in writing to that effect, 
and report in writing an overview of the trial results. 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
36/39 Page 
 
 
Storage of Records 
The investigator shall retain essential documentation relating to the conduct of the trial in accordance with the 
directives of the director of the institution. 
 
20. INFORMED CONSENT 
Time to Obtain Consent 
The investigator or sub-investigator will obtain written consent by the trial subject prior to the commencement 
of the study. 
Methods for Explaining to Trial Subjects 
The investigator (or sub-investigator) will give explanations to trial subjects. Study collaborators can give 
supplemental explanations. 
The explanations should be given based on the explanation/consent document using terms which are the easiest 
to understand (non-technical terms). Questions made by trial subjects should be answered appropriately in the way 
the trial subjects can understand. 
 
Methods for Obtaining Consent 
(1) 
The investigator (or sub-investigator) who has given explanations will sign and date the consent document. 
(2) 
If any study collaborator has given supplemental explanations, the study collaborator will also sign and date 
the consent document. (Study collaborators are not allowed to solely give all necessary explanations to trial 
subjects.) 
(3) 
Supply the trial subject with the consent document and explanation document describing aforementioned 
necessary information and take sufficient time for the trial subject to decide whether or not he/she should 
participate in the clinical study. 
(4) 
Before obtaining consent, take sufficient time for the trial subject to sufficiently review the consent items and 
ask any questions. Answer the questions in a convincing manner. 
(5) 
Obtain the trial subject's spontaneous written consent to participate in the clinical study. 
(6) 
After obtaining the consent document signed and dated by the trial subject, the investigator (or sub-
investigator) will enter the date of consent in the CRF and in the medical record. All consent documents must 
be retained. 
(7) 
Supply the trial subject with the copy (duplicate for the trial subject) of the consent document and the 
explanation document before the trial subject participates in the clinical study. 
(8) 
If the explanation document or consent document is subject to revision during the participation of the trial 
subject, follow the above procedures and re-obtain consent. 
 
Items Mentioned for the Written Informed Consent Form and Explanatory Documents 
(1) 
The fact that the clinical study involves research. 
(2) 
The purpose of the trial. 
(3) 
The name and title of the investigator or sub-investigator, and how he or she can be contacted. 
(4) 
The trial method (including the aspects of the trial that are experimental, subject’s inclusion/exclusion criteria, 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
37/39 Page 
 
 
and when the trial is randomized, the probability of randomization for each treatment). 
(5) 
The expected clinical benefits, and the foreseeable risks or inconveniences to the subjects. (If any benefits 
for the subject will not be expected, it must be informed to the subject.) 
(6) 
When the persons to be enrolled as trial subjects are subjects, the availability of other medical treatments for 
their condition, and the potential major benefits and risks of such treatments as are available. 
(7) 
The expected duration of the subjects’ participation in the trial. 
(8) 
Subjects may deny or withdraw their will to participate in a clinical study at any time since participation in a 
clinical study is voluntary. Subjects will not be treated disadvantageously for denying or withdrawing 
participation, nor will not lose their due benefit for not participating in the clinical study. 
(9) 
Handling of investigational products in case of withdrawing from the clinical study. 
(10) The monitor, auditor, Ethics committee etc., and the regulatory authority may view the original information 
related to the medicine. In such a case, the confidentiality of the subject is protected. The subject approves 
the viewing of such information by signature and seal or signature in the informed consent.  
(11) That the subjects’ confidentiality will be protected even when the results of the clinical study are published. 
(12) The person in the study site whom the subjects should contact for further information about the trial or their 
rights, or if they develop a health problem associated with the trial. 
(13) The compensation and medical treatment the trial subjects can receive should they develop a health problem 
associated with the trial. 
(14) The number of subjects expected to be enrolled in the trial (including discrete variable). 
(15) If information is received that may affect the will of the subjects regarding the subjects’ ongoing participation 
in the trial, that information will be passed on promptly to the subjects. 
(16) The circumstances under which or the reasons subjects will be withdrawn from the trial. 
(17) The specifics about any expense the trial subjects will have to pay. 
(18) The specifics about any cash or the like that will be paid to the trial subjects (including the arrangement for 
calculating the sum to be paid). 
(19) Responsibilities of the trial subjects. 
(20) Information about Independent ethics committee (IEC) 
(21) The name of the study and the fact that the head of medical institute approved the conduct of the study 
(22) The procedure of disclosure of information 
(23) The fact that the documents related to protocol and procedure of the study are available, as far as there is no 
interruption regarding protection of personal information and originality of the study, depending on the 
request from subject etc. Also procedure of its access. 
(24) Handling of personal information (including the procedure of anonymity, if applicable ) 
(25) The procedure of storing and disposal of the information 
(26) Conflict of Interest of the investigator, medical institution etc. regarding the study, including funding source, 
personal income and so on. 
(27) If there is a possibility that the sample or information of subjects might be used in future study or provided 
to other research institution, the fact and assumed contents when informed consent is obtained. 
 

Protocol No.: CLJ369-P001 
38/39 Page 
 
 
Revision of Informed Consent Form and Explanatory Documents 
If the investigator acknowledges the necessity of revising the explanatory document used for obtaining consent, 
in the case of the obtainment of the information which may affect the trial subject's intention to continuously 
participate in the clinical study or in other cases, immediately revise the explanatory document and have the revision 
approved by the IEC. 
 
21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 
Alcon Japan Ltd. is sponsor of this clinical study. Alcon Japan Ltd. and head of the medical institution will sign 
a contract for the clinical study. Financial cost of the study will be sponsored by Alcon Japan Ltd in accordance 
with the contract. 
Financial information to medical institutions paid by Alcon Japan Ltd. is disclosed at Homepage of Alcon Japan 
Ltd.. 
 
22. REFERENCES 
1) Compan V, Lopez-Alemany A, Riande E, et al. Biological oxygen apparent transmissibility of hydrogel 
contact lenses with and without organosilicon moieties. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 359–365. 
2) NEGISHI Kazuno, Way to cope with presbyopia, Journal of the Eye 2010; 27: 751-756. 
3) Legras R, Benard Y, Rouger H. Through-focus visual performance measurements and predictions with 
multifocal contact lenses. Vision Res 2010; 50: 1185-1193. 
4) Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW et al. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens 
discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens 2013; 39: 93-99. 
5) Varikooty J, Keir N, Richter D et al. Comfort response of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact 
lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 945-953. 
6) HOSAKA Koichi, Product introduction, Multifocal 2 week daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses 
“Air Optix Multifocal”. Journal of Japan Contact Lens Society 2009; 51: 309-312. 
7) Guillon M, Maissa C, Cooper P et al. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal 
contact lens. CLAO J 2002; 28: 88-93. 
8) MARUYAMA Kunio, The 36th product introduction, 1-Day ACUVUE® MOIST® Multifocal. Journal of 
Japan Contact Lens Society 2015; 57: 289-293. 
 
 

Protocol No.:CLS104-P001 
39/39 Page 
 
 
Signature page 
The Sponsor and the Principal Investigator agree to conduct the study in accordance 
with the details and procedures described in this study protocol. 
The Sponsor and the Principal Investigator agree to conduct the study in accordance 
with the details and procedures described in this study protocol. 
 
Principal Investigator 
 
Medical Institution: [ 
] 
Affiliation and position: [ 
] 
Name (Signature): [ 
] 
(Signature) 
Date:  
 
 
Sponsor 
 
Director, Clinical Development, Alcon Japan, Ltd. 
Name (Signature): [ 
] 
(Signature) 
Date: