Metformin With the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for the Treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer (EC) in Non-surgical Patients
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Complex Atypical Hyperplasia, Endometrial Cancer
Sponsor: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #8 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for 
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
 
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_ Editorial, administrative changes (IRB approval)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval)
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
_X_ 
Eligibility Changes (IRB approval) 
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
 
This amendment addresses a change to the month 12 time point and the final study 
encounter. Amendment 5 changed the designation of the final study event from “visit” to
“encounter” as the subject could be contacted by phone. However, activities in the final
study encounter that required an office visit remained in the Time and Events Table and 
in the text (Section 6.5) and need to be removed. Further, the language of “Final Study 
Encounter” was not carried throughout the protocol.
This amendment provides editorial/administrative changes to the protocol to clarify the 
language surrounding the Final Study Encounter throughout the protocol and the 
activities associated with that encounter. The random (non-fasting) glucose originally
scheduled for the Final Study Encounter has been moved to the 12-month time point in
the protocol. Additionally, the Principal Investigator has been changed to Dr. Victoria 
Bae-Jump.
The Eligibility criteria has been changed from excluding subjects with current use of
progestin therapy to excluding subjects with current use of progestin therapy that has 
been ongoing for > 3 months.  
Editorial Changes:
1.
Section 6.4.3: Added a random (non-fasting)glucose as an evaluation at month 12.
2. Section 6.5: Changed the designation of from Final Study Visit to Final Study Encounter 
in the title and text. Changed wording that subjects “may” rather than “will” return to the 
clinic.  Removed the last sentence of the paragraph describing final study evaluation 
activities. 
3. Time and Events Table. Section 6.1:  Changed title of last column on the right to “Final 
Study Encounter.” Removed History and Physical, Random (non-fasting) glucose, and 

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
Blood and Urine collection from Final Study Encounter activities. The random (non-
fasting) glucose was moved to the month 12 time point. 
4. The Principal Investigator has been changed from Dr. Allison Staley to Dr. Victoria Bae-
Jump.
 
Eligibility Change
 
1. Criterion 3.2.2: The criterion has been changed from excluding subjects with current use 
of progestin therapy to excluding subjects with current use of progestin therapy that has 
been ongoing for > 3 months. 
 
 
The attached version dated May 15, 2020, incorporates the above revisions.
 

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #7 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for 
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
 
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_ Editorial, administrative changes (IRB approval)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval)
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
__X_  Eligibility Changes (IRB approval) 
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
The time measurements for the LCCC1326 trial were originally stipulated in a mix of 
weeks and months that could benefit from clarification.  In order to ensure consistent 
time measurement, this amendment modifies time references as needed.
Additionally,
the required time limit for screening labs has been clarified to within 30 days.
 
This amendment also updates the exclusion criteria to remove the limit on tumor size of 
less than or equal to 2cm, as an aid in enrollment of additional subjects.
In addition, because UNC Lineberger recently changed its multicenter SOPs to allow for 
distribution of protocol amendments to all sites at the same time, this amendment 
modifies language in the protocol to allow that.
Additionally, the language explaining the Study Withdrawal process, as well as the 
language explaining the drug handling and disposal for Metformin, has been updated. 
Editorial Changes:
 
• Time measurements have been restated where needed for clarity and to facilitate 
analysis. These changes have been made in Sections 1.1, 1.3.3, 3.2.7, 3.2.10, 4.1,
4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.8, 5.1.6, 6.1, and 6.4.2. 
 
•
In Sections 4.2 and 5.4, the timing of screening labs has been clarified to within
30 days of starting treatment.
 
• The Study Withdrawal language in Section 4.10 has been updated in line with 
current process.
 

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
•
In Section 5.1.5, the language regarding drug handling and disposal has been
clarified for Metformin.
 
•
Section 8.6 has been updated to reflect a recent change in multicenter SOPs to
allow for distribution of protocol amendments to all sites at the same time.
 
Eligibility Changes:
• Tumor size > 2cm on MRI or pelvic ultrasound has been removed from the 
Exclusion Criteria in Section 3.2.3.
 
 
The attached version dated March 4, 2019, incorporates the above revisions.
 
 

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #6 
 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
 
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_ Editorial, administrative changes (site added, IRB notification required)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval) 
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
___
Eligibility Changes (IRB approval)
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
 
•
The role of Principal Investigator has transferred from Stephanie Sullivan, MD to
Allison Staley, MD.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #5 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer 
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_  Editorial, administrative changes (site added, IRB notification required)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval) 
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
___
Eligibility Changes (IRB approval)
 
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
•
Sections 4.2 and 5.5 updated to increase the number of days between IUD
placement and start of metformin treatment.  Subjects may now begin treatment 
within 30 days of IUD placement, instead of 7 days.
•
Section 4.8 updated to remove the word “visit” in describing the last study
encounter for follow-up purposes. Subjects may come in for a clinic visit, or be 
contacted by a study team member via phone.
•
A biopsy window added to the Time and Events Table to allow a +/- 2 week
window for the standard of care biopsies which occur every 3 months.   

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #4 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer 
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_  Editorial, administrative changes (site added, IRB notification required)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval) 
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
___
Eligibility Changes (IRB approval)
 
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
The protocol has been updated to include a clarifying note for non-surgical candidates.
The following language was added to the protocol: 
 
"Patient determined to be a non-surgical candidate by the primary treating physician."

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #3 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for 
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer 
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_  Editorial, administrative changes (site added, IRB notification required)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval)
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
___
Eligibility Changes (IRB approval) 
 
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
We submit to you two changes to our screening procedures and one change to the 
wording in study information
 
1. Currently, we require cervical cultures for gonorrhea and chlamydia prior to IUD placement for
all patients enrolled on study. This is not the standard of care and was added in by an IRB 
reviewer when the trial was initially reviewed. Since then, this has proved to be a significant 
impedance to successful enrollment as cultures are frequently collected at the time of IUD 
placement (to avoid multiple pelvic exams) and take 3 days to return. This requires patients to 
return after cultures have resulted for drug when they would have usually would not have to 
return again for 3 months. The American College of OB/GYNs recommends that cervical cultures 
only be collected prior to IUD placement for women at high risk. The US preventative services 
task force recommends screening for STI for women age 24 and younger as these women are at 
highest risk for STIs. We would like to modify our protocol to only require screening for those 
women who are high risk at age 24 and younger. We have consulted the IRB chair and vice-
chairs regarding this change and they are in agreement with our proposed change. Additionally, 
the vice-chairs supported not repeating testing for women who have had or been treated for 
gonorrhea or chlamydia in the past 3 months which we are advocating for as well.  
2. At our pre-treatment visit, we require that women undergo a urine pregnancy test prior to IUD 
placement. This is the standard of care for any gynecologic or surgical procedure. We are 
currently requiring women of childbearing potential to have a negative serum pregnancy test 
within 7 days of starting drug. Given the high sensitivity of a urine pregnancy test as evidence by 
its use to rule out pregnancy prior to IUD placement, this serum pregnancy test is redundant and 
unnecessary. We would like to take this out of our screening protocol.   
3. We have changed verbiage surrounding the D&C procedure. The D&C procedure is frequently 
done to make a definitive diagnosis of hyperplasia or endometrial cancer; however, many women 
are diagnosed only on biopsy. If the primary provider does not feel that a D&C is necessary, 
many women will forgo the morbidity of the procedure and have the LR-IUD placed in clinic. 
We have changed the study design to reflect this practice pattern.  

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #2 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer 
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_  Editorial, administrative changes (site added, IRB notification required)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval) 
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
___
Eligibility Changes (IRB approval)
 
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
The Principal Investigator is changing from Dr. Kemi Doll to Dr. Stephanie Sullivan.
Additionally, the hip-to-waist measurement has been removed and the funding source has
been updated to Golfers Against Cancer.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT #1 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer 
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
AMENDMENT INCORPORATES (check all that apply):
__X_  Editorial, administrative changes (site added, IRB notification required)
___
Scientific changes (IRB approval) 
___
Therapy changes (IRB approval)
___
Eligibility Changes (IRB approval)
 
AMENDMENT RATIONALE AND SUMMARY:
This study was a single center trial being conducted at UNC. An additional site located
out of state is being added to assist with meeting accrual objectives. Text has been added
in the protocol to note that this is a multi-center study in the study synopsis, study schema 
and statistical sections. Instructions for how metformin will be purchased and supplied 
have been added in the drug information section of the protocol (ie, 5.1.2 Supplier/How
Supplied) to account for the addition of a new study site. Section 5.1.5 Return and
Retention has been added to the drug information section. Sections 4.3 and 5.1.2 have 
been revised to include wording for handling of metformin at an additional study site. 
Section 5.1.5 return/retention of drug supply was added. Section 6.1 footnote 3 was
edited to account for multi-center study. Additional standard wording has been added to
Section 8.0 Study Management to account for the conduct of a multi-center trial. In 
addition, a new statistician has been assigned to the study due to personnel changes.

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients  
 
Principal Investigator
Victoria Bae-Jump, MD PhD
Division of Gynecologic Oncology 
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 
CB# 7572
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
919-843-4899 (phone)
919-966-2646 (fax)
vbae@unch.unc.edu (email)
 
 
Biostatistician
Dominic Moore, PhD
 
Clinical Protocol Office
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center 
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 
450 West Drive, 3rd Floor, CB# 2795
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295 
 
Multicenter Project Manager:
Phone: 919-966-7359 
Fax: 919-966-4300 
 
University of North Carolina Cancer Study Coordinator 
Phone: 919-966-4432 
Fax: 919-962-2621 
 
 
Sponsor: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Funding Source: Golfers Against Cancer Grant
Version: May 15, 2020. Version 1.1

LINEBERGER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER
 
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM
 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
 
LCCC 1326: Metformin with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device for 
the treatment of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia (CAH) and Endometrial Cancer 
(EC) in Non-surgical Patients
 
Principal Investigator 
Victoria Bae-Jump, MD PhD
Division of Gynecologic Oncology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 
CB# 7572 
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
919-843-4899 (phone)
919-966-2646 (fax)
vbae@unch.unc.edu (email)  
 
 
 
 
Signature Page
The signature below constitutes the approval of this protocol and the attachments, and 
provides the necessary assurances that this trial will be conducted according to all 
stipulations of the protocol, including all statements regarding confidentiality, and
according to local legal and regulatory requirements and applicable U.S. federal
regulations and ICH guidelines. 
 
Principal Investigator (PI) Name:_______________________
 
PI Signature: ___________________
Date:___________________
 
Protocol Version Date: May 15, 2020 Version 1.1

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
i 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ............................................................... 1
1.1
Study Synopsis.................................................................................................. 1
1.2
EC and CAH.....................................................................................................1
1.3
Metformin.........................................................................................................2
1.4
Study Rationale ................................................................................................. 6
1.5
Correlative Studies ............................................................................................ 6
2.0
STUDY OBJECTIVES....................................................................................... 7
2.1
Primary Objective ............................................................................................. 7
2.2
Secondary Objectives........................................................................................7
2.3
Exploratory Objectives......................................................................................7
2.4
Endpoints .......................................................................................................... 8
3.0
PATIENT ELIGIBILITY ..................................................................................8
3.1
Inclusion Criteria ............................................................................................... 8
3.2
Exclusion Criteria.............................................................................................. 9
4.0
TREATMENT PLAN....................................................................................... 10
4.1
Schema ........................................................................................................... 10
4.2
Dilation and Curettage (D&C).........................................................................10
4.3
Treatment Dosage and Administration.............................................................11
4.4
Toxicities and Dosing Delays/Dose Modifications........................................... 11
4.5
Concomitant Medications/Treatments ............................................................. 12
4.6
Other Modalities or Procedures .......................................................................13
4.7
Duration of Metformin Therapy ......................................................................13

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
ii
4.8
Duration of Follow Up ....................................................................................14
4.9
Removal of Patients from Protocol Therapy .................................................... 14
4.10
Study Withdrawal............................................................................................ 15
5.0
DRUG INFORMATION .................................................................................. 15
5.1
Investigational Agent Description and Management -Metformin..................... 15
5.2
Commercial Drug Description and Management .............................................17
5.3
Adverse Events Associated with Commercial Drug.........................................17
6.0
EVALUATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS.........................................................19
6.1
Time and Events Table....................................................................................19
6.2
Screening ........................................................................................................ 22
6.3
Pre-Treatment ................................................................................................. 22
6.4
Treatment Assessments ...................................................................................22
6.5
Final Study Visit .............................................................................................23
6.6
Early Termination/Study Withdrawal Visit ...................................................... 23
6.7
Correlative Studies .......................................................................................... 23
6.8
Assessment of Safety.......................................................................................25
6.9
Assessment of Efficacy ...................................................................................25
6.10
Adherence....................................................................................................... 25
7.0
ADVERSE EVENTS ........................................................................................25
7.1
Definitions ...................................................................................................... 25
7.2
Documentation of non-serious AEs or SARs ................................................... 27
7.3
SAEs or Serious SARs ....................................................................................27
7.4
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan.....................................................................28
8.0
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................29

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
iii 
8.1
Study Design...................................................................................................29
8.2
Sample Size, Stopping Rule, and Accrual ........................................................ 29
8.3
Data Analysis Plans ......................................................................................... 30
9.0
STUDY MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 30
9.1
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval and Consent ................................ 31
9.2
Required Documentation.................................................................................31
9.3
Registration Procedures...................................................................................31
9.4
Data Management and Monitoring/Auditing.................................................... 32
9.5
Adherence to the Protocol ............................................................................... 32
9.6
Amendments to the Protocol............................................................................34
9.7
Record Retention.............................................................................................35
9.8
Obligations of Investigators............................................................................. 35
10.0
REFERENCES .................................................................................................36

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
1
1.0
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
1.1
Study Synopsis
This is an open label, single-arm, multi-center study of the addition of metformin 
to standard levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LR-IUD) treatment of 30 
evaluable non-surgical patients with either complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH;
n=15) or grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC; n=15). Women, over the age
of 18 years, with biopsy-proven CAH/EC who are not candidates for surgical 
management, and therefore are planned to start standard of care treatment with the 
LR-IUD, will be given oral metformin therapy for 12 months, or until disease
progression occurs (whichever occurs first), in addition to LR-IUD treatment.
Serial endometrial biopsies will be performed, as per standard of care, to assess 
disease status. We hypothesize that the addition of metformin to standard LR-IUD 
treatment of CAH and grade 1 EC will result in a complete response (CR) rate at
6 months that is significantly higher than 50% in a population of non-surgical
candidates.  In addition, we plan to estimate CR rate at 6 months in CAH and EC 
separately, and in the group as a whole at 12 months. We will also document the 
rate of patient adherence to long-term metformin therapy.
1.2
EC and CAH
EC is the fourth most common cancer among women in the United States (1). 
Type I or those tumors of endometrioid histology comprise 70-80% of cases and 
are thought to arise from unopposed estrogen stimulation, either endogenous or
exogenous. CAH is a neoplastic condition of the endometrium and is a precursor
lesion to EC. If untreated, CAH progresses to invasive cancer at a rate of 30% (2). 
In addition, CAH and grade 1 EC represent a spectrum of neoplasia, evidenced by 
a 40-50% rate of concurrent EC found on hysterectomy specimen when CAH is
present (3) as well as a concordance of only 40% among pathologists when
deciding between CAH and grade 1 EC (4). Given this overlap, these pathological 
diagnoses are treated similarly clinically. 
Obesity, which increases
bioavailable
estrogen levels by
enhancing the 
conversion of androstenedione to estrone in peripheral adipose tissue, is a well-
established risk factor for type I EC and its precursor lesion, CAH, and has been
estimated to account for up to 40-90% percent of type I EC cases (5-7). Insulin
resistance, of which a marker is the level of adiponectin (a protein secreted by 
adipose cells), characterizes obesity associated metabolic syndrome and diabetes. 
Low adiponectin levels, indicating insulin resistance, have been found to be
significantly associated with the development of EC (8). Correspondingly,
diabetes and insulin resistance have been linked to a 2-3 fold increased risk of 
developing CAH and EC (8-11).  
The standard of care therapy for CAH and EC is surgical excision and staging.
However, there is a growing subset of patients for whom surgery is not an option. 
Due to the obesity epidemic and increasing numbers of reproductive-age women 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
2
being diagnosed with CAH/EC, non-surgical options that can maintain fertility
and avoid operative risks are essential. Patients with major medical co-morbidity 
and poor performance status are not operative candidates, but require curative 
therapy for CAH/EC. A current accepted alternative treatment option for these
patients is long-term progesterone therapy in the form of the levonorgestrel-
releasing IUD (LR-IUD).  Gunderson and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis 
of 45 studies (n=391 subjects) evaluating women with CAH or EC undergoing 
progestin therapy (systemic therapy or LR-IUD). For the group as a whole, the
CR rate (as assessed via biopsy) was 66% for CAH and 48% for EC. (12) Median
time to response was 6 months. Importantly, 25% of CAH and 37% of EC 
patients experienced relapse after initial response (12). In the literature for 
CAH/EC, an assessment of response is categorized by pathologic criteria on
follow-up biopsies. A complete response (“disease regression”) is defined as no
evidence of microscopic viable hyperplasia or cancer cells; stable disease 
(“disease persistence”) is defined as no change in biopsy status from prior to 
treatment; and progressive disease is defined as newly found or increase in grade
of adenocarcinoma from the pre-treatment biopsy (12, 13).
1.3
Metformin
An adjuvant therapy to progestins for CAH/EC may be metformin. Metformin is 
an anti-diabetic medication (biguanide class) that is widely used as the first line 
treatment of type II diabetes. It is an inexpensive, well-tolerated, effective
medication
for
normalizing
hyperglycemia
(14),
and
also
prevents
the
development of diabetes in patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome (15, 
16). Increasing epidemiological evidence suggests that metformin lowers all 
cancer risk and reduces cancer incidence and deaths among diabetic patients (17-
19). In our own retrospective analysis of metformin and EC outcomes in diabetic
patients, metformin use was significantly associated with improved progression 
free survival (PFS;HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.70, p<0.01) and overall survival (OS; 
HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.59, p<0.0001) (20).
Metformin’s immediate downstream target is AMP-activated protein kinase 
(AMPK), and its activation by metformin leads to regulation of multiple signaling
pathways involved in the control of cellular proliferation, including inhibition of
the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. Alterations in the mTOR 
pathway, involving LKB1 and PTEN, have been implicated in EC carcinogenesis 
in up to 83% of type 1 ECs (21-23). Furthermore, our preliminary work reveals
that metformin is a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation in EC cell lines, through
inhibition of mTOR signaling (24).
 
Metformin may be effective in treating CAH and EC. In an animal mouse model
of endometrial hyperplasia (EH), metformin exhibited anti-proliferative effects on
the endometrium that coincided with inhibition of downstream targets of the 
mTOR pathway (25). Case reports have shown that metformin plus oral 
contraceptives, and metformin plus progesterone have been effectively used to
treat CAH refractory to progesterone alone (26, 27). Metformin has also been

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
3
implicated in the reversal of progestin resistance that can develop during long-
term treatment of CAH/EC with progestins (28), providing rationale for its use in 
combination with localized progestin therapy.  
1.3.1 Published Studies of Metformin in Non-Diabetic Cancer Patients 
Two clinical trials of metformin use in cancer patients have been published,
neither of which specifically enrolled diabetic patients. In a pre-operative window
study in operable breast cancer patients, the percentage of cells staining for Ki-67, 
a marker of cell proliferation, fell significantly after only 2 weeks of treatment 
with metformin, with parallel beneficial effects on cell signaling pathways such as
the mTOR pathway (29).
A completed phase I study of temsirolimus and
metformin in advanced solid tumors demonstrated acceptable toxicity and 
promising response rates in a heavily pre-treated group of patients (30). In these 
trials, no significant toxicities were associated with metformin use in non-diabetic
patients.
Additionally,
in our
own preoperative
window
study in obese
endometrial cancer patients, we did not find any significant toxicity and most of 
the women were non-diabetic. Taken together, these studies suggest a similar and 
favorable
side
effect
profile
between
non-diabetics
and
diabetics
taking
metformin.
1.3.2
Preliminary and Planned Studies of Metformin in EC
Pre-operative Window Study of Metformin. Based on our preliminary in vitro 
work (24, 31), we conducted a pre-operative window study of metformin in EC 
patients at UNC-CH (LCCC 1102). In this study, obese women who were to
undergo surgical staging for EC received short-term treatment (2-4 weeks) with
metformin that continued until the day before their surgery. Metformin 
significantly reduced Ki-67 staining based on comparison of pre-treatment 
endometrial biopsies with post-treatment hysterectomy specimens (mean of
19.5% decrease, p=0.026) (32). Metformin was also well tolerated with only two
grade 1 toxicities of mild abdominal pain and loose stools, which did not require 
discontinuation of treatment.
In
addition,
metformin
treatment
resulted
in
decreased
expression
of
phosphorylated AMPK
(60.3%,
p=0.00001), phosphorylated Akt
(44.2%, 
p=0.0002), phosphorylated S6 (51.2%, p=0.0002) and phosphorylated 4E-BP-1 
(74.7%, p=0.001). Metformin decreased estrogen receptor (ER) expression
(65.7%, p=0.0002), but had no effect on progesterone (PR) expression.
Metabolomic profiling of serum indicated that treatment “responders” appeared 
more sensitive to metformin’s effect on central carbon metabolism, particularly 
with respect to systemic lipolysis, which correlated with a shift in lipid and
carbohydrate metabolism in their corresponding tumors.
 
The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has recently approved a clinical trial of 
metformin in EC patients, and Dr. Bae-Jump is the Principal Investigator of this
study. This trial is a two arm, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II/III trial
designed to assess the efficacy and safety of metformin in combination with 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
4
paclitaxel and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin alone in women with
advanced and recurrent EC. This trial is set to open for enrollment in 2013.  
 
Metformin Transporter Proteins. One critical, unanswered question in regards
to the action of metformin is the extent to which this drug accumulates in
neoplastic tissues. Metformin is highly hydrophilic with a net positive charge at 
all physiologic pH values. Therefore, it requires cation-selective transport proteins 
that mediate its entry into cells. The cation-selective transporters organic cation
transporter (OCT)1-3, plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT) and
multidrug and toxin extrusion transporters (MATE) 1-2 mediate metformin 
transport in the liver, intestine, and kidney(33-39) Less is known about the 
expression of these transporter proteins in solid tumors. Studies in our laboratory
show that metformin uptake into human breast cancer cell lines are dictated by the
expression levels of these cation-selective transporters (unpublished data). 
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that metformin uptake into endometrial 
cancer cell lines and tissues must be mediated by specific cation-selective
transporters.
 
Initial real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) experiments to determine if 
cation-selective metformin transporters are expressed in endometrial cancer cell
lines showed that all transporters of interest are present at varying levels
(unpublished data). MATE1 and 2 were the most highly expressed transporters in 
endometrial cancer cell lines (Ishikawa and ECC-1) while OCT2 and 3 were the 
least expressed transporters. In the serous endometrial cancer cell line (SPEC-2),
MATE1 and PMAT expression predominated, with much decreased expression of
MATE2. We also assessed the expression of the metformin transporter proteins in 
fifteen human endometrial cancer specimens and adjacent benign tissues. MATE1 
was found to be the predominant transporter in endometrial tumor and benign
tissues; however, PMAT and OCT3 were also expressed in significant amounts.
Thus, we anticipate that the highly expressed MATE1 will facilitate metformin 
intracellular uptake into endometrial tumors and be predictive of treatment 
response to this agent.
1.3.3 Metformin Associated Toxicities
The risks of metformin treatment in patients with CAH/EC are minimal.
Metformin is one of the most common drugs used for the treatment of type II 
diabetes mellitus as well as for ovulation induction in Polycystic Ovarian 
Syndrome (PCOS) patients. For the purpose of this study, patients will be taking a
standard clinical dose of metformin that is used commonly in the treatment of
type II diabetes.
 
The usual dose of metformin is 850-1,000 mg twice daily. The maximum safe
dose is thought to be 850 mg three times daily. To minimize gastrointestinal (GI)
upset or diarrhea, it is recommended to start with a low dose and work up to the 
recommended dose. Thus, we plan to start with the dose of 850 mg once a day 
and titrate this to 850 mg twice a day, over the course of 30 days. This twice a day

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
5
regimen is also the dose that is commonly being used in clinical trials for
metformin as cancer treatment (see www.clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing clinical 
trials of metformin for cancer treatment).  
 
GI side effects are by far the most common adverse effects associated with 
metformin (30% of patients) and include abdominal bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, 
nausea and vomiting, weight loss and loss of appetite. Lactic acidosis is a rare
(0.03 cases per 1000 patient-years, with 0.015 fatal cases per 1000 patient-years)
but life threatening complication. Predisposing risk factors in patients who 
developed lactic acidosis included decreased liver and kidney function and age 
greater than 80 years old. Less well-defined risk factors include alcoholism,
recent
radio-contrast
studies
with
iodinated
contrast
media
and
surgical
procedures or drugs that decrease fluid intake and tissue perfusion (e.g. 
nifedipine, furosemide and cationic drugs). Of note, in more than 20,000 patient-
years exposure to metformin in clinical trials, there have been no incidents of
lactic acidosis (see http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_glucophage.pdf). Recent
literature has demonstrated that metformin is safe in patients with cardiovascular 
disease, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and even patients 
with mild renal impairment (40, 41). However, for precautionary measures, in
this study patients will be required to stop metformin for 48 hours before and after
any radio-contrast studies with iodinated contrast media.  
 
Long-term (years) use of metformin has been associated with vitamin B-12
deficiency. Hepatotoxicity is also rare with an incidence of less than 0.1% (3 case
reports in the literature). In all cases, liver enzymes returned to normal after 
stopping metformin. Other rare side effects include rash, headache, agitation, 
dizziness and tiredness.
Hypoglycemia is rare when metformin is given in therapeutic doses, but may
result if caloric intake is insufficient or if strenuous exercise occurs without
adequate intake of calories. The risk is slightly higher for those patients who are 
taking metformin in combination with the following other oral medications for 
diabetes,
including
glipizide,
glyburide
and
sitagliptin.
However,
in
the
management of diabetes, metformin is routinely combined with these other oral
agents, indicating the overall safety of this drug.
 
With regard to non-diabetic patients, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics
studies do not reveal a change in basal glucose level in non-diabetic metformin
users versus placebo. 
In a randomized study between healthy controls and 
randomized first degree normoglycemic relatives of patients with non-insulin 
dependent diabetes, basal glucose level did not differ between the groups and was
within normal parameters (42). Metformin use in healthy males under strenuous
exercise conditions did not induce higher rates of lactic acidosis and plasma 
glucose levels were similar in healthy subjects who received metformin versus 
placebo (43).
Metformin appears to differentially act upon the erythrocyte
insulin binding receptors in obese non-insulin dependent diabetics and non-
diabetics; it increased the receptor capacity dramatically in the diabetics and only 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
6
moderately in non-diabetics, suggesting that metformin has a hypoglycemic effect
mainly in Type II diabetics but not in non-diabetics (44). 
1.4
Study Rationale
Unfortunately, 25% of CAH and 37% of EC patients go on to relapse after 
treatment with hormonal therapy. Relapse of CAH/EC patients after treatment
with progesterone is thought to be related to progesterone resistance. Metformin is
a generic oral anti-hyperglycemic. Recent evidence suggests that metformin 
reduces cancer risk and cancer deaths among diabetic patients (17-19). Based on 
preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies, metformin demonstrates anti-proliferative
effects for both endometrial hyperplasia and cancer through inhibition of the
mTOR pathway. Metformin has also demonstrated reversal of progesterone-
resistance in endometrial cancer cell lines. In clinical data, metformin has been 
associated
with
decreased
cellular
proliferation
(via
Ki-67
staining)
in
endometrial
cancer
specimens
of
patients
undergoing
primary
surgical
management. Given our promising preclinical data, we hypothesize that the 
addition of metformin to standard LR-IUD progestin therapy will result in a CR 
rate at 6 months that is significantly higher than 50%. The comparator rate of
50% is based on results reported in the meta-analysis referenced earlier, and
because a response rate significantly greater than this will be considered clinically 
meaningful by the investigators.
The rate of CR at 6 months is our primary 
interest as this was the median time to response in the meta-analysis (12). Due to
metformin’s long term and wide spread use in patients with significant
comorbidity, as well as proven safety and efficacy in healthy women with PCOS 
and non-diabetics, it is an ideal medication to evaluate in a population of non-
surgical candidates.
In addition, our proposed clinical trial of metformin in combination with the LR-
IUD will complement the proposed GOG trial in that we will (1) explore the 
potential activity of metformin in CAH and early stage EC patients as opposed to
the advanced and recurrent patient population, and (2) we will investigate the
combination of metformin with hormonal as opposed to cytotoxic therapy.
If 
these study results are positive, we plan to propose a multicenter GOG trial of this 
treatment regimen, to establish a new standard of care for non-surgical patients
with CAH/EC.
1.5
Correlative Studies
We will explore the association of metabolic factors, expression of the metformin 
transporter proteins and key targets of the metformin/mTOR signaling pathway 
(i.e. Ki-67, AMPK, LKB1, AKT, PTEN, S6, 4E-BP1) with treatment response to
metformin. Metabolic factors, including baseline body mass index (BMI), and
glucose levels, will be documented and followed throughout treatment. Matched 
paraffin embedded tissues before and during metformin treatment will also be 
collected for immunohistochemical analysis of the metformin transporter proteins,
Ki-67, and key components of the metformin/mTOR signaling pathway. Blood
and urine will be collected at baseline and every 3 months during the study as a 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
7
means to (1) explore associations between metformin concentration levels and
therapeutic outcomes, and (2) identify metabolic biomarkers of response to 
treatment through metabolomic profiling. Endometrial tissue will also be 
collected at the 6 month time point for analysis of metformin uptake into the
endometrium.
2.0
STUDY OBJECTIVES
2.1
Primary Objective
2.1.1 To compare the rate of CR at 6 months in non-surgical grade 1 EC and CAH 
patients receiving metformin + LR-IUD to 50%  
2.2
Secondary Objectives
2.2.1
To estimate the rate of CR at 6 months separately in grade 1 EC and CAH patients
receiving metformin + LR-IUD
2.2.2 To estimate the rate of CR at 12 months in non-surgical grade 1 EC and CAH 
patients receiving metformin + LR-IUD 
2.2.3
To
document
patient
adherence
to
long-term
(≥3
months)
metformin
administration
2.2.4 To describe safety of metformin + LR-IUD treatment 
2.3
Exploratory Objectives
2.3.1
To explore changes in cellular proliferation as measured by the marker, Ki-67,
from baseline to 6 months
2.3.2 To explore association between the level of expression of the metformin 
transporter proteins and key targets of the metformin/mTOR signaling pathway
and CR status at 6 months
2.3.3 To perform a comprehensive unbiased profiling of metabolites by analyzing the 
metabolic “fingerprints” of the biofluids (i.e. serum and urine) and “footprints” of
the tumor tissue pre- and post- 6 months of metformin treatment
2.3.4
To explore association between metabolic factors and metformin concentration
levels in tumor tissue/blood/urine and CR at 6 months

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
8
2.4
Endpoints 
2.4.1
Primary Endpoint:
CR (“complete disease regression”), as defined by no evidence of microscopic 
viable hyperplasia or carcinoma on endometrial biopsy after 6 months of 
treatment.
2.4.2 Secondary Endpoints: 
•
CR, as defined above, at 6 months of treatment by CAH and EC
•
CR, as defined above, at 12 months of treatment in group as a whole 
•
Adherence to at least 80% of scheduled doses over duration of prescribed
treatment 
•
The type, severity and attribution of adverse events, by NCI Common 
Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version (v) 4.0
3.0
PATIENT ELIGIBILITY 
3.1
Inclusion Criteria 
Subjects must meet all of the inclusion criteria to participate in this study:
3.1.1 Histologically confirmed CAH or grade 1 EC
3.1.2
Females age ≥18 years
3.1.3 ECOG Performance Status 0 – 4  
3.1.4 Non-surgical candidates due to: 
•
Desire for fertility preserving treatment
•
Unacceptable surgical risk as defined by:
o American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) ≥4
and/or Perioperative Cardiac Risk > 5%(45) and/or
Perioperative
Respiratory Failure Risk > 5%(46)
AND
o Independent medicine or cardiology pre-op consultation concluding 
‘high’ surgical risk.  
•
Patient determined to be a non-surgical candidate by the primary treating
physician.
3.1.5
Planned treatment with the LR-IUD for CAH or grade 1 EC by primary physician
3.1.6 Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have negative urine pregnancy
test within 7 days of D1 of treatment 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
9
3.1.7 Understand study design, risks, and benefits and have signed informed consent
3.2
Exclusion Criteria
Any patient meeting any of the exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded 
from study participation. 
3.2.1
Evidence of renal dysfunction (Cr > 1.5mg/dL or Cr clearance < 60mL/m2) or
liver dysfunction (AST/ALT > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN))
3.2.2
Current use of progestin therapy (local, topical, or systemic) that has been
ongoing for > 3 months
3.2.3 Myometrial invasion >50% or evidence of nodal or metastatic disease on baseline 
MRI (MRI only to be done for EC patients)  
3.2.4
Mixed histology including clear cell, serous, undifferentiated or sarcomatous
elements
3.2.5 Prior or current use of metformin within the past 3 months
3.2.6
History of hypersensitivity to metformin or history of discontinuation secondary
to attributed adverse effects
3.2.7 Chronic (daily use for > 30 days) use of cimetidine (significant increase in 
metformin concentration and risk of lactic acidosis)
3.2.8
Iodinated contrast agents used in prior 48 hours (significant increase in metformin
concentration and risk of lactic acidosis)
3.2.9 
Pregnant or lactating
3.2.10 Recent (< 30 days) active, documented, cervical infection  

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
10 
4.0
TREATMENT PLAN 
4.1
Schema
This is an open-label, single-arm, multi-center, study of the addition of metformin 
to the LR-IUD for treatment of non-surgical patients with CAH and grade 1 EC. 
While patients will be enrolled prior to dilation and curettage (D&C) and
placement of the LR-IUD, both are standard of care, and will not be impacted by
enrollment into the study. 
 
Oral metformin therapy will be started within 1 week of LR-IUD placement and
continued for 12 months unless disease progression occurs or the patient develops
intolerability.
4.2
Dilation and Curettage (D&C)
As part of standard of care in treating CAH and EC with non-surgical progestin 
therapy, patients will undergo a D&C procedure for definitive diagnosis and
therapeutic effect. During this procedure, the LR-IUD is placed. D&C is a safe,
outpatient procedure that will be performed by a gynecologic oncology attending, 
fellow, or resident. In this procedure, the uterine lining tissue is removed with 
standard curette instruments. The main risk of this procedure is uterine
perforation, which occurs at a rate of 1-2%. D&C would be performed regardless
of study enrollment, and is not considered part of the current study. However, 
confirmation of CAH or EC will not be made, and therefore metformin will not be 
started, until after results of the D&C are read by the PI. This will occur within 3
days of receipt of the results and 7 days of the procedure and the patient will be
informed that they can then initiate metformin. If a patient's provider does not feel 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
11 
that they require a D&C procedure, the LR-IUD may be placed in clinic. The
patient will undergo screening and pre-treatment testing at this time or the visit 
prior to the LR-IUD placement and will start the metformin within 30 days of 
IUD placement.
Note that screening must occur within 30 days of starting
treatment.
 
4.3
Treatment Dosage and Administration
All patients enrolled in this study will be non-surgical patients with planned LR-
IUD treatment by the primary physician, per standard of care. Once the diagnosis
of CAH or EC is confirmed by D&C, patients will be additionally treated with
metformin as an investigational agent. Patients will be started on the standard 
clinical starting dose of metformin (850 mg once daily orally, titrated to twice 
daily over the course of one month (30 days)). This dose of 850mg twice daily
will be continued for the duration of their prescribed study treatment. Patients will
fill out a pill diary to record their usage. This diary will be provided to patients as 
a document separate from this protocol. Metformin will be obtained and 
dispensed
by
Investigational
Drug Services at
participating centers. The
participating research sites have experience with metformin administration on
clinical trials and will be well versed in managing dose escalation and side-
effects. Patients will be instructed to take metformin with meals. 
4.4
Toxicities and Dosing Delays/Dose Modifications 
Any patient who receives treatment on this protocol will be evaluable for toxicity.
Each patient will be assessed weekly for the first 2 weeks, then every 30 days
thereafter for the development of any toxicity according to the Time and Events 
table (6.0). Toxicity will be assessed according to the NCI CTCAEv4. Dose 
adjustments should be made according to the system showing the greatest degree
of toxicity.
 
We anticipate that metformin related hypoglycemia and GI disturbances will be 
the two most common side effects. Metformin will be discontinued if the patient
experiences (1) a single grade 3 or higher metformin-related GI disturbance or
grade 4 or higher hypoglycemic episode, or (2) two or more grade 2 side effects 
considered related to metformin therapy, or (3) if the patient requires a dose less 
than 850mg once daily. Patients may request to stop the drug at any time.
See section 8.2 for a stopping rule related to the proportion of patients who must 
discontinue metformin due to toxicities for the study to be suspended.
Metformin Toxicity Dose Reductions
Event 
Action 
Hypoglycemia 
Grade 1-2
Patient education, avoidance of fasting states
Grade 3 
Decrease to metformin 850mg once daily  
Grade 4 
Discontinue metformin, follow-up per protocol 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
12 
GI Distress 
Grade 1-2 
Patient education, avoidance of fasting states 
Grade 3
Discontinue metformin, follow-up per protocol
4.4.1 Management of Hypoglycemia
Hypoglycemia is a rare side effect of metformin in both diabetic and non-diabetic
patients. All patients, however, will be warned of the potential signs and 
symptoms (i.e. hunger, headache, confusion, irritability, drowsiness, weakness, 
dizziness, tremors, sweating, fast heartbeat, seizure or fainting). If these
symptoms were to occur, patients would be counseled to consume one of these
quick-fix foods right away to raise their blood glucose. 
 
•
3 or 4 glucose tablets
• 1 serving of glucose gel—the amount equal to 15 grams of carbohydrate  
•
1/2 cup, or 4 ounces, of any fruit juice
• 1/2 cup, or 4 ounces, of a regular—not diet—soft drink  
•
1 cup, or 8 ounces, of milk
• 5 or 6 pieces of hard candy  
• 1 tablespoon of sugar or honey  
After this, patients would be instructed to contact the gynecologic oncology clinic 
or study coordinator for further recommendations. If patients already have a 
glucose meter, patients would be counseled to check their glucose level
immediately. If the level is below 70 mg/dL, one of the above quick-fix foods
would be consumed right away to raise their blood glucose. Patients will be 
instructed to recheck their blood glucose in 15 minutes to make sure it is 70 
mg/dL or above. If it is still too low, another serving of a quick-fix food should be
eaten. These steps should be repeated until the blood glucose level is 70 mg/dL or
above. As stated previously, hypoglycemia is less likely in non-diabetic patients. 
If this were to occur, they will be managed in the same manner as detailed above.  
4.5
Concomitant Medications/Treatments 
Patients are excluded if they are currently taking cimetidine. No other medications
are absolutely contraindicated while on metformin therapy.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
13 
4.6
Other Modalities or Procedures
4.6.1
Endometrial Biopsies
Patients will undergo follow-up endometrial biopsies every 3 months to assess 
histology and
grade and to
determine
disease
persistence, response, or 
progression, as per standard of care. Metformin therapy will continue without
change in dosing on biopsy days. At the 6 month time point only, an additional
pass will be made with the endometrial pipelle, in order to collect tissue for the 
correlative studies.  
These patients will already be familiar with the procedure of endometrial biopsy
since most will have undergone this procedure when they were diagnosed. 
Endometrial biopsies will be performed either by a gynecologic oncology 
attending, gynecology attending, gynecology resident or gynecologic oncology
clinical fellow. Patients will be offered acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (i.e. ibuprofen) if needed for uterine cramping. Patients will 
be given appropriate instruction on fever and bleeding precautions during the 
surgical procedure consent process.
An endometrial suction curette (e.g., Pipelle®) will be used to sample the 
endometrial lining for each follow up biopsy. These disposable devices are 
constructed
of
flexible
polypropylene
with
an
outer
sheath
measuring
approximately 3 mm in diameter with a 2.4 mm distal side port, through which
the endometrial sample is obtained. The flexibility of this type of curette allows 
the cannula to conform to the contour of the uterus and minimizes cramping. The 
accuracy of endometrial biopsy to detect endometrial disease, especially the
sensitivity
of
detecting
endometrial
cancer
is
83%
to
96%
(47-50).
 
The most common risks to the patient for this procedure are cramping and a vaso-
vagal response. Other much rarer risks included uterine bleeding (usually due to
previously undiagnosed coagulopathies), uterine perforation (0.1 – 1.3%), pelvic
infection and bacteremia (<1%). Besides these risks, there are no known 
additional risks to patients undergoing multiple endometrial biopsies. These 
procedures would be performed regardless of study enrollment.
4.7
Duration of Metformin Therapy 
The planned duration of metformin therapy is 12 months. Metformin treatment
will be discontinued early in the following scenarios: 
•
Progression
of disease, as defined
by CAH
progression to invasive 
adenocarcinoma or grade 1 EC progression to grade 2 or 3 EC, at any of the
standard of care biopsies at 3, 6, and 9 months. In any of these cases, 
metformin will be discontinued within 3 days of results of the biopsy.
•
Unacceptable toxicity as defined by a single grade 3 or higher GI disturbance
attributed to metformin, a single grade 4 or higher hypoglycemia episode, 2 or 
more grade 2 toxicities attributed to metformin, or requirement for a dose 
below 850 mg once daily.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
14 
Response to therapy will be assessed at 3-month intervals. As per standard of 
care, endometrial biopsies will be performed every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) to 
assess histology and grade to determine response. This will be the basis of
whether therapy should continue. If the 3 month biopsy demonstrates disease
progression, the patient will be removed from protocol directed treatment and 
followed-up per protocol, and treatment decisions will be at the discretion of the 
treating physician. Otherwise, therapy will continue through 6 months. If the 6-
month or 9-month biopsy demonstrates complete response (complete disease
regression) or partial response (partial disease regression), metformin will be 
continued until 12 months of total therapy is given. If the 6-month or 9-month 
biopsy demonstrates stable disease, continuation of metformin on study will be at
the discretion of the treating physician. Please see the schema (section 4.1) for
clarity.
 
In addition, treatment will be stopped in the setting of:
•
Inter-current illness that prevents further administration of treatment
•
Pregnancy 
•
Patient decides to withdraw from study treatment, OR
•
General or specific changes in the patient’s condition render the 
patient unacceptable for further treatment in the judgment of the
investigator.
4.8
Duration of Follow Up
Patients will be followed until their final study encounter (this may be a clinic 
visit, or phone call), which will occur within 30 days of their final endometrial 
biopsy while on metformin. Metformin is to be stopped the day of the 12-month
endometrial biopsy, or the day on which the results of prior biopsies are known, if
they indicate disease progression. In the case of ongoing adverse events/serious 
adverse event, patients will be followed to resolution of the event. 
4.9
Removal of Patients from Protocol Therapy 
Patients will be removed from protocol therapy when any of the criteria listed in
section 4.7 apply. The Principal Investigator will be notified, and the reason for
study removal and the date the patient was removed will be documented in the 
electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF).  
In case a patient decides to prematurely discontinue protocol therapy (“refuses
treatment”), the patient should be asked if she may still be contacted for further 
scheduled study assessments. The outcome of that discussion should be 
documented in both the medical records and in the eCRF.
Excessive patient withdrawals from protocol therapy or from the study can render 
the study un-interpretable; therefore, unnecessary withdrawal of patients should 
be avoided.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
15 
4.10 
Study Withdrawal 
If a subject decides to withdraw from the study (and not just from protocol
therapy) an effort should be made to complete and report study assessments as 
thoroughly as possible. At the time of withdrawal, the Investigator should attempt 
to establish as completely as possible the reason for the study withdrawal.
•
The subject should be asked if they are willing to allow for the abstraction
of relevant information from their medical record in order to meet the long 
term follow up (e.g., survival) objectives outlined in the protocol.   
•
A complete final evaluation at the time of the subject’s study withdrawal
should be obtained with an explanation of why the subject is withdrawing
from the study.
• 
If the subject is noncompliant and does not return for an end of study 
follow up assessment, this should be documented in the eCRF.
•
If the reason for removal of a subject from the study is an adverse event,
the principal specific event will be recorded on the eCRF.
 
Excessive subject withdrawals from protocol therapy or from the study can render
the study un-interpretable; therefore, unnecessary withdrawal of subjects should
be avoided. 
 
5.0
DRUG INFORMATION
5.1
Commercial Drug Description and Management -Metformin
5.1.1 Mechanism of Action/Indications 
Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent that improves glucose tolerance in
patients with type II diabetes, lowering both basal and postprandial plasma
glucose. Its pharmacologic mechanisms of action are different from other classes 
of oral
antihyperglycemic
agents. Metformin decreases hepatic glucose 
production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose, and improves insulin
sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. Unlike
sulfonylureas, metformin does not produce hypoglycemia in either patients with 
type II diabetes or normal subjects (except in special circumstances, see adverse 
events section) and does not cause hyperinsulinemia. With metformin therapy,
insulin secretion remains unchanged while fasting insulin levels and day-long
plasma insulin response may actually decrease.  
5.1.2
Supplier/How Supplied
Metformin is generic and made by several different manufacturers. Investigational 
Drug Services at participating centers will be responsible for the purchase and
distribution of metformin to the patients enrolled in this study. Patients will be
provided metformin free of charge for this trial.
 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
16 
Clinical supplies will be affixed with a clinical label in accordance with
regulatory requirements.
 
This trial is open-label; therefore, the subject, the trial site personnel, the Sponsor
and/or designee are not blinded to treatment. Drug identity (name, strength) is
included in the label text; random code/disclosure envelopes or lists are not 
provided. 
5.1.3 Dosage and Administration 
For type II diabetes mellitus, the initial recommended dosage of metformin is 500
mg twice daily or 850 mg once daily given with meals, and then titrated to twice
daily dosing. For this study, patient will take 850 mg once daily, and this dose 
will be titrated to twice daily dosing. Metformin should be taken with meals.
5.1.4 Storage and Stability 
Metformin should be stored between 20 and 25 degrees Celsius (68 and 77°F)
with excursions permitted between 15 and 30°C (59 and 86°F). Metformin is
dispensed in a light-resistant container. 
 
5.1.5
Handling and Disposal
The investigator or designee is responsible for keeping accurate records of the
clinical supplies received for this trial, the amount dispensed to and returned by 
the subjects, and the amount remaining at the conclusion of the trial.  
Local requirements for disposal of hazardous drugs should be followed at each
participating clinical site.Please see UNC policy on hazardous drugs: 
https://unchealthcare-uncmc.policystat.com/policy/4734545/latest/ 
Full prescribing information for Metformin is available at:
https://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_glucophage_xr.pdf
5.1.6
Adverse Events Associated with Metformin
The potential risks involved in metformin treatment are minimal but include 
gastrointestinal side effects, lactic acidosis, hepatotoxicity and hypoglycemia. All
patients will have a serum pregnancy test (if of childbearing age) and baseline
creatinine and liver enzymes drawn at the time of their enrollment. These labs will 
be reviewed by the principal investigator, and the patient notified that she has 
been cleared to take metformin per the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients will
be contacted weekly during the first 2 weeks of metformin treatment and then
every 30 days by the study coordinator to ensure that these women are not 
experiencing any appreciable side effects.
Hypoglycemia is a rare side effect of metformin in both diabetic and non-diabetic
patients. See section 4.4.1 for information on management of hypoglycemia.
 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
17 
Please refer to the agent’s package insert for a comprehensive list of adverse
events.  
5.2
Commercial Drug Description and Management- Levonorgestrel-Releasing 
Intrauterine Device 
Mechanism of Action and Indications
The LR-IUD is commercially available as the Mirena© intrauterine system. It is a 
sterile T-shaped polyethylene frame with a steroid reservoir containing 52 mg of 
levonorgestrel. It is a long-term contraceptive agent and used to treat heavy
menstrual bleeding. The mechanism of action that prevent pregnancy include
thickening of the cervical mucus, inhibition of sperm capacitation, and alterations 
of the endometrium. The alterations of the endometrium are a result of local 
progestin effects and include stromal pseudodecidualization, glandular atrophy, a
leukocytic infiltration and a decrease in glandular and stromal mitoses. Due to
these effects, the LR-IUD has been used in diseases previously treated with oral 
progestin therapy - heavy menstrual bleeding and hyperplasia and early 
endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Supplier/How Supplied
The LR-IUD is currently only commercially available in the Mirena© intrauterine 
system. As a standard alternative treatment for hyperplasia and early stage
endometrial adenocarcinoma, it is reimbursed by insurance plans and will be
supplied by the UNC pharmacy. Patients and/or their insurance companies will be 
billed for this product.
Formulation/Dosage and Administration
The LR-IUD contains 52 mg total of levonorgestrel and releases approximately 
20 mcg/day.   
Storage/Stability
Mirena© is supplied sterile and is sterilized with ethylene oxide. It is stored at 
25°C with excursions permitted between 15-30°C. If the package seal is disrupted 
prior to use, it must be discarded. It cannot be re-sterilized.
5.3
Adverse Events Associated with Commercial Drug
The most comment adverse reactions associated with the LR-IUD is change in
menstrual bleeding pattern, abdominal/pelvic pain, and the formation of 
headache/migraines. As part of standard therapy, patients would be counseled 
about these possible effects. They will be instructed to call the gynecologic
oncology clinic if any concerns arise.
 
The majority of LR-IUD users experience resolution of such symptoms between 1 
– 12 weeks after insertion. In the setting of changes in bleeding pattern, this is
most commonly a decrease in heavy bleeding associated with CAH/EC and would
be unlikely to require intervention. Abdominal/pelvic pain will be treated with 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
18 
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication or acetaminophen as needed, in over
the counter formulations. Headaches and/or migraines that result from the LR-
IUD will be similarly treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication or 
acetaminophen. Persistent headaches requiring discontinuation of the LR-IUD
would be addressed by the primary physician as this would impact standard of
care therapy for inoperable CAH/EC.
 
Pregnancy. Pregnancy is rare with the LR-IUD, with a reported rate of 0.1% for
ectopic pregnancy. There have been 390 live births out of 9.9 million LR-IUD
users as of 2006.
 
Uterine Perforation. At the time of placement of the LR-IUD there is a risk of
uterine perforation. Correct technique by trained personnel mitigates most of this
risk. Perforation can be recognized at the time of insertion or at any time when the 
cervical os strings are no longer visible. Pregnancy may occur in this setting.  
Expulsion. The highest rate of expulsion occurs in the first month after LR-IUD
placement and can be up to 4.9%. Risk factors for expulsion include placement by 
untrained personnel and recent (<6 weeks) pregnancy or abortion.  
Please see the package insert for a comprehensive list of adverse events.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
19
6.0 
EVALUATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS
6.1 
Time and Events Table
Screening 
Pre-
treatment
Visit
Month 
(Mo) 1
Week (Wk)
1
Mo3
Mo6
Mo9 
Mo12 
Early  
Termination
2
Final  
Study
Encounter2
Inclusion/
Exclusion Criteria
X
History1 and Physical
X 
 
 
X
X
X 
X
 
 
Informed Consent
X
Education of potential 
side effects
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pregnancy test (serum),
if applicable
X3
 
 
 
 
 
 
Random (non-fasting)
glucose
X
X
AST/ALT
X 
 
 
X
X
X 
X
 
 
Serum creatinine
X
X
X
X
X
Cervical cultures4
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MRI or Pelvic US5
X
 
D&C, LR-IUD
insertion
X
 
 
 
 
 
Pregnancy test (urine)
X3 
Metformin Treatment6 
Metformin treatment begins D1 of Month 1; continue as per 
sections 4.3-4.4
 
 
AE Assessment 
X7 
 
X
Patient Diary
 
X
X7
Request tissue 
X8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Endometrial Biopsy  
 
 
X
X9
X 
X
 
 
Blood and urine
collection10
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
20
Footnotes to Time and Events Table
1Comprehensive medical history at baseline; thereafter history focused on symptoms and toxicities
2Patients will be followed until final study encounter, which will occur within 30 days of their final endometrial biopsy while on
metformin. Metformin is to be stopped the day of the 12-month endometrial biopsy, or the day on which the results of prior biopsies
are known, if they indicate disease progression. In the case of ongoing adverse events/serious adverse event, patients will be followed
to resolution of the event. If early termination of the study occurs (i.e., prior to 12 months), the patient will be asked to have serum and 
urine collected, and the patient followed-up until any treatment related adverse events have resolved or returned to baseline. Their
standard of care every 3 month (+/- 2 weeks) endometrial biopsy will be performed as scheduled by their physician as per routine care.
3Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have negative urine pregnancy test within 7 days of D1 of treatment; urine
pregnancy test (for WOCBP) will be conducted on the day of outpatient surgery as well, per standard of perioperative care.
4During the pelvic exam, which is part of the standard of care evaluation for newly diagnosed CAH/EC, cultures of gonorrhea and
chlamydia will be taken to rule out cervical infection for women at high risk for sexually transmitted infections per ACOG
recommendations. This includes women age 24 years or younger. Those women who have had negative gonorrhea or chlamydia
testing or have been treated for gonorrhea or chlamydia within 3 months of placement do not require repeat cultures.
5For patients with EC only, MRI prior to the D&C is required to rule out >50% myometrial invasion or nodal metastases. Results of
MRI studies of the uterus done within 30 days of enrollment will be accepted. For patients whose BMI precludes MRI testing, a pelvic
ultrasound with tumor size measurements < 2 cm will be substituted.
6Treatment with metformin will last a minimum of 90 days and a maximum of  12 months depending on the patient’s response to
treatment as determined by endometrial biopsy.
7The first AE assessment will occur one week after starting metformin treatment; patients will be contacted weekly the first two weeks
of therapy, and subsequently every 30 days by the study coordinator via phone to inquire about side effects of metformin. Adherence
assessments will also be performed at the same intervals with patient reporting number of missed doses per week, based on review of
their medication diary.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
21
8Endometrial biopsy slides and blocks (pretreatment samples) will be obtained from referring physicians of these patients for analysis
in this study
9At the 6 month timepoint only, an additional pass will be made with the endometrial pipelle, in order to collect tissue for the
correlative studies.
10For measurement of metformin concentration, and for metabolomics (see section 6.7).

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
22 
6.2
Screening
Women with CAH/grade 1 endometrial cancer will be recruited from the
Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecology clinics at participating centers. All 
patients will already have had a baseline endometrial biopsy performed, to 
establish their diagnosis and referral to the gynecologic oncology clinic. A sample
of this tissue will be requested from the referring physician. All patients will have
a urine pregnancy test (if of childbearing age), gonorrhea and chlamydia cervical 
cultures if they are age 24 or younger, and baseline serum creatinine, glucose and 
liver enzymes drawn at the time of their screening visit. These labs will be
reviewed by the principal investigator. Note that screening labs must occur within
30 days of starting treatment. 
6.3
Pre-Treatment
Per standard course of treatment, all women undergoing IUD placement for the 
treatment of CAH/EC will undergo dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure to
confirm histologic diagnosis and for placement of the IUD if deemed necessary
by their primary provider. Urine pregnancy test (for women of childbearing age) 
will be conducted on the day of outpatient surgery as well, per standard of 
perioperative care at UNC. Final pathology results from the D&C will be
reviewed by the principal investigator. The patient will be notified within 3 days
of the receipt of results, confirming CAH/grade 1 EC histology, that she is cleared 
to start study treatment with metformin. This will occur within 30 days of LR-
IUD placement. Blood and urine samples will also be collected for correlative
studies (see section 6.7). If the patient does not require a D&C, she will have a
urine pregnancy test prior to IUD placement as is the standard of care and will 
start metformin within 30 days of IUD placement.
6.4
Treatment Assessments 
6.4.1
Month 1 Week 1
D1 Month 1: Patient is instructed to initiate metformin via phone call: Patient will
be contacted weekly for first 2 weeks by the study coordinator via phone
regarding toxicities, and adherence assessments. 
6.4.2 Monthly during Metformin 
Patient will be contacted every 30 days by the study coordinator via phone
regarding toxicities, and adherence assessments.
6.4.3
Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Laboratory evaluations: serum creatinine, liver function test 
Endometrial biopsy (see section 6.7) 
Blood and urine samples for correlative studies (see section 6.7)
Random (non-fasting) glucose (month 12)

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
23 
6.5
Final Study Encounter 
Metformin is to be stopped the day of the 12-month endometrial biopsy, or the
day on which the results of prior biopsies are known, if they indicate disease 
progression. In the case of ongoing adverse events/serious adverse event, patients 
will be followed to resolution of the event. After completion of metformin
treatment, patients may return to clinic as per scheduled with their primary
provider. The final study encounter will be within 30 days of the final endometrial 
biopsy.  
6.6
Early Termination/Study Withdrawal Visit 
If early termination of the study occurs (i.e., prior to 12 months), the patient will
be asked to have serum and urine collected, and their standard of care every 3
month endometrial biopsy will be performed as scheduled by their physician as 
per routine care. No other evaluations will be needed in the event of early 
termination. Subjects may withdraw voluntarily from participation in the study at
any time (see section 4.10). Subjects may also withdraw voluntarily from
receiving the study intervention for any reason.   
 
If voluntary withdrawal occurs due to an adverse event, the subject will be given
appropriate care under medical supervision until the symptoms of any adverse
event resolve or the subject’s condition becomes stable.  
6.7
Correlative Studies
Endometrial biopsies will be performed per standard clinical practices. At the first 
6 month time point only, an additional pass will be made with the endometrial
pipelle, in order to collect endometrial tissue for the correlative studies (i.e.
measure metformin concentration and metabolomic profiling). The time at which 
the last dose of metformin was taken prior to endometrial biopsy will be recorded.  
Additionally, blood and urine samples will be collected from clinic and
transported to the Tissue Procurement Facility for coding (to remove patient
identifiers) and eventual distribution to the Principal Investigator.  Samples will 
include: (1) a total of 10 cc of blood collected in a gold-top tube, (2) a total of 10 
cc of blood collected in a green top heparinized tube, and (3) a minimum of 40 cc
of urine collected in a non-sterile urine-specimen container. In addition, the
endometrial biopsy slides and blocks (pretreatment samples) will be obtained 
from referring physicians of these patients for analysis in this study. These slides 
will also be compared to those obtained from serial endometrial biopsies, as a
means to delineate the effect of metformin treatment. Tissue, blood and urine
samples will be packaged and transported to the laboratory for determination of 
metformin concentration and metabolomic profiling.  
Analysis of metformin in plasma and urine: Metformin concentrations in
plasma and urine will be determined using a liquid chromatography–tandem mass 
spectrometry method in Dr. Dhiren Thakker’s laboratory.  

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
24 
Analysis of metformin uptake in endometrial tissue: Metformin concentrations
in endometrial tissue will be determined using liquid chromatography-mass 
spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), as previously described (51). This will be performed 
in the laboratory of Dr. Dhiren Thakker.
Ki-67: Tissue microarrays will be constructed and immunohistochemical analysis 
will be performed to assess for Ki-67. The percentage of Ki-67 positive cells, 
termed the Ki-67 index, will be calculated pre- and post-treatment. The Ki-max
and Ki-min will also be quantified. Stained slides will be visually scored by
experienced observers blinded to the identity of the tissue sections. Individual 
slides will be digitized using the Aperio ScanScope (Aperio Technologies, Vista, 
CA), and digital images will be analyzed using Aperio ImageScope software.
Immunohistochemical Analysis: Tissue microarrays will be constructed and 
immunohistochemical analysis will be performed to assess expression of the key 
components of the metformin/mTOR, including AMPK, LKB1, Akt, PTEN,
S6K1 and 4E-BP1. Phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of these
proteins will be evaluated. Expression of the metformin transporter proteins will 
also be assessed by immunohistochemical analysis, including OCT1-3, MATE1/2 
and PMAT. Stained slides will be visually scored by experienced observers
blinded to the type of antibody used and to the identity of the tissue sections.
Individual slides will be digitized using the Aperio ScanScope (Aperio 
Technologies, Vista, CA), and digital images will be analyzed using Aperio 
ImageScope software.
Metformin Transporter mRNA Expression in Endometrial Tissues. Total 
RNA will be isolated from EH paraffin-embedded tissues and subjected to RT-
PCR for determination of metformin transporter mRNA expression, including
OCT1-3, MATE1/2 and PMAT. The relative mRNA levels for individual
transporters will be normalized to the 18s rRNA housekeeping gene.
 
Metabolomic Analysis: We will perform comprehensive metabolomic analysis
of serum and urine to identify potential biomarkers responsive to metformin
treatment using mass spectrometry. These analyses uncover the subtle differences 
between the spectra that correlate to the disease or treatment under study 
revealing metabolomic “footprints” (from tissue) and “fingerprints” (from
biofluids). Thus, a comprehensive unbiased profiling of metabolites (molecule
weight<1000 Dalton) will be performed, and we will analyze the metabolic 
“fingerprints” of the biofluids (i.e. serum and urine) of women with endometrial 
hyperplasia/cancer, pre- and post- 6 months of metformin treatment. Time of
flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS) coupled to chromatographic separations
including
gas chromatography
(GC-TOF-MS, Leco
Corp.)
and
liquid 
chromatography (LC-TOF-MS, Agilent Corp.) will be used for the measurement 
of tumor specimens and biofluids, and these analyses will be conducted according
to previously developed methods by the UNC NORC/Nutrition Research Institute
Metabolomics Core. Significant variables (metabolite markers) will be selected 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
25 
based on a threshold of a multivariate statistical parameter, such as variable
importance in the projection (VIP) value (usually VIP>1) from a typical 7-fold 
cross-validated orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis 
(OPLS-DA) model. These differential metabolites will be validated at a univariate
level such as Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. The critical p
value of the test is usually set to 0.05.
6.8
Assessment of Safety
Any patient who receives at least one dose of metformin treatment on this 
protocol will be evaluable for toxicity via NCI CTCAE v 4.0.
6.9
Assessment of Efficacy 
All patients who receive at least 3 months of metformin therapy will be evaluable
for assessment of the primary endpoint – response at 6 months. 
6.10
Adherence
All patients who initiate treatment with metformin will be evaluable for missed 
doses/week to assess the endpoint of adherence to at least 80% of doses over the
cumulative course of treatment.
7.0
ADVERSE EVENTS 
7.1
Definitions  
7.1.1
Adverse Event (AE)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., an abnormal
laboratory finding, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a 
drug) in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical 
product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this
treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign
(including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally 
associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the 
medicinal product.
Hospitalization for elective surgery or routine clinical procedures that are not the 
result of an AE (e.g., surgical insertion of central line) need not be considered 
AEs and should not be recorded as an AE. Disease progression should not be
recorded as an AE, unless it is attributable by the investigator to the study therapy.
7.1.2
Suspected Adverse Reaction (SAR)
A suspected adverse reaction (SAR) is any AE for which there is a reasonable 
possibility that the drug is the cause.
Reasonable possibility means that there is 
evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the drug and the AE.
A
suspected adverse reaction implies a lesser degree of certainty about causality
than adverse reaction, which means any adverse event caused by a drug.   
 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
26 
Causality assessment to a study drug is a medical judgment made in consideration
of the following factors: temporal relationship of the AE to study drug exposure, 
known mechanism of action or side effect profile of study treatment, other recent 
or concomitant drug exposures, normal clinical course of the disease under
investigation, and any other underlying or concurrent medical conditions. Other
factors to consider in considering drug as the cause of the AE:
• Single occurrence of an uncommon event known to be strongly associated 
with drug exposure (e.g., angioedema, hepatic injury, Stevens-Johnson
Syndrome)
• One or more occurrences of an event not commonly associated with drug 
exposure, but otherwise uncommon in the population (e.g., tendon
rupture); often more than once occurrence from one or multiple studies
would be needed before the sponsor could determine that there is 
reasonable possibility that the drug caused the event.
•
An aggregate analysis of specific events observed in a clinical trial that
indicates the events occur more frequently in the drug treatment group 
than in a concurrent or historical control group 
7.1.3 Unexpected AE or SAR 
An AE or SAR is considered unexpected if the specificity or severity of it is not
consistent with the applicable product information (e.g., Investigator’s Brochure
(IB) for an unapproved investigational product or package insert/summary of 
product characteristics for an approved product).  Unexpected also refers to AEs 
or SARs that are mentioned in the IB as occurring with a class of drugs or as
anticipated from the pharmacological properties of the drug, but are not
specifically mentioned as occurring with the particular drug under investigation.
7.1.4
Serious AE or SAR
An AE or SAR is considered serious if, in the view of either the investigator or 
sponsor, it results in any of the following outcomes:
•
Death;
•
Is life-threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death from 
the event as it occurred);
•
Requires inpatient hospitalization (>24 hours) or prolongation of
existing hospitalization;*
•
Results in congenital anomaly/birth defect;
•
Results in a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial 
disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
•
Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-
threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered a serious 
adverse drug experience when, based upon appropriate medical
judgment, they may jeopardize the patient or subject and may require
medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed 
in the definition.  For reporting purposes, also consider the occurrences 
of pregnancy as an event which must be reported as an important
medical event.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
27 
*Hospitalization for anticipated or protocol specified procedures such as
administration of chemotherapy, central line insertion, metastasis interventional 
therapy, resection of primary tumor, or elective surgery, will not be considered
serious adverse events.
 
Pregnancy that occurs during the study must also be reported as an SAE. 
7.2
Documentation of non-serious AEs or SARs
For non-serious AEs or SARs, documentation must begin from day 1 of study
treatment and continue through the 30 day follow-up period after treatment is
discontinued. 
 
Collected information should be recorded in the Case Report Forms (CRF) for
that patient. Please include a description of the event, its severity or toxicity
grade, onset and resolved dates (if applicable), and the relationship to the study
drug.   Documentation should occur at least monthly.
7.3
SAEs or Serious SARs  
7.3.1
Timing
After informed consent but prior to initiation of study medications, only SAEs
caused by a protocol-mandated intervention will be collected (e.g. SAEs related to 
invasive procedures such as biopsies, medication washout, or no treatment run-
in).
For any other experience or condition that meets the definition of an SAE or a
serious SAR, recording of the event must begin from day 1 of study treatment and 
continue through the 30 day follow-up period after treatment is discontinued.
7.3.2 Documentation and Notification 
These events (SAEs or Serious SARs) must be recorded in the SAE console
within Oncore™for that patient within 24 hours of learning of its occurrence.
7.3.3
Reporting
IRB Reporting Requirements:
• UNC will submit an aggregated list of all SAEs to the UNC IRB annually 
at the time of study renewal according to the UNC IRB policies and
procedures.
• The UNC-IRB will be notified of all SAEs that qualify as an 
Unanticipated Problem as per the UNC IRB Policies using the IRB’s web-
based reporting system (see section 9.5.3) within 7 days of the Investigator
becoming aware of the problem.
•  For affiliate sites using a local IRB of record, please submit adverse 
events per local IRB policy.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
28 
•
For affiliate sites relying on the UNC-IRB, an aggregated list of all SAEs
will be submitted to the UNC IRB annually at the time of study renewal 
according to the UNC IRB policies and procedures. In addition, any SAEs 
that qualify as an Unanticipated Problem will be entered into Oncore and
reported to the UNC IRB by the UNCCN Project Manager using the IRB’s
web-based reporting system (see section 9.5.3) within 7 days of the
Investigator becoming aware of the problem.
Pregnancy
Pregnancies (including a positive pregnancy test regardless of age or disease
state) of a female subject occurring while the subject is on study should be
recorded as SAEs. The patient is to be discontinued immediately from the study.
The female subject should be referred to an obstetrician-gynecologist, preferably 
one experienced in reproductive toxicity for further evaluation and counseling.
The Investigator will follow the female subject until completion of the pregnancy, 
and must document the outcome of the pregnancy (either normal or abnormal
outcome). If the outcome of the pregnancy was abnormal (e.g., spontaneous or
therapeutic abortion), the Investigator should report the abnormal outcome as an
AE. If the abnormal outcome meets any of the serious criteria, it must be reported 
as an SAE.
7.4
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan 
The Principal Investigator will provide continuous monitoring of patient safety in
this trial with periodic reporting to the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee
(DSMC).  
Meetings/teleconferences will be held at a frequency dependent on study accrual,
and in consultation with the study Biostatistician.  These meetings will include the 
investigators as well as protocol nurses, clinical research associates, regulatory 
associates, data managers, biostatisticians, and any other relevant personnel the
principal investigators may deem appropriate. At these meetings, the research
team will discuss all issues relevant to study progress, including enrollment, 
safety, regulatory issues, and data collection.
The team will produce summaries or minutes of these meetings. These summaries
will be available for inspection when requested by any of the regulatory bodies 
charged with the safety of human subjects and the integrity of data including, but 
not limited to, the oversight (Office of Human Research Ethics (OHRE)
Biomedical IRB, the Oncology Protocol Review Committee (PRC) or the North
Carolina TraCS Institute Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).   
 
The UNC LCCC Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will review the
study on a regular (quarterly to annually) basis, with the frequency of review
based on risk and complexity as determined by the UNC Protocol Review 
Committee. The UNC PI will be responsible for submitting the following

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
29 
information for review: 1) safety and accrual data including the number of
patients treated; 2) significant developments reported in the literature that may 
affect the safety of participants or the ethics of the study; 3) preliminary response 
data; and 4) summaries of team meetings that have occurred since the last report.
Findings of the DSMC review will be disseminated by memo to the UNC PI,
PRC, and the UNC IRB and DSMB.
8.0
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
8.1
Study Design 
This is an open label, single-arm, multi-center study of metformin in addition to
the LR-IUD for the treatment of non-surgical patients with CAH and grade 1 EC.
We hypothesize that metformin + LR-IUD will result in a CR rate at 6 months
that is significantly higher than 50%.
8.2
Sample Size, Stopping Rule, and Accrual 
The goal accrual is 32 patients (16 CAH, 16 EC) and we expect to enroll 1-2
patients/per month. Our power calculation and analysis will be based on 30
patients, assuming early discontinuation of 2 participants prior to 3 months of 
treatment. We estimate 18 months to complete accrual.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the CR rate at 6 months to a rate 
of 50% (the 50% is based on results reported in the meta-analysis referenced 
earlier, and because a response rate significantly greater than this will be
considered clinically meaningful by the investigators). With a combined sample
size of 30 evaluable patients with either CAH or grade 1 EC, and assuming a null
CR rate of 50% and an alternative of 75%, we will have 80% power to conclude
that the CR rate at 6 months is significantly higher than 50% using an exact test
for a single proportion with a two-sided α of 0.05. Furthermore, the exact 95%
confidence interval for the CR rate at 6 months will have a maximum width of 
0.374.  This means that the CR rate will be estimated within at least 18.7%. CAH
and grade 1 EC represent a spectrum of neoplasia, which is why the two groups
are being combined for the primary objective. The CR rate at 6 months will be
estimated separately in the CAH and EC groups as a secondary objective.
 
Sequential boundaries will be used to suspend the trial if excessive toxicity is seen
that requires discontinuation of metformin. If the study reaches a stopping
boundary, it may be terminated by the PI, or submitted to the DSMC with a
description of the toxicities and a rationale for why the study should be continued. 
At the patient level, metformin will be discontinued if a patient experiences: (1) a
single grade 3 or higher metformin-related GI disturbance or grade 4 or higher
hypoglycemic episode, or (2) two or more grade 2 side effects considered related 
to metformin therapy, or (3) if the patient requires a dose less than 850mg once 
daily. The accrual will be halted if the number of patients discontinuing
metformin for one of the reasons above is equal to or exceeds bn out of n patients
who have been followed for toxicity for 3 months. This is a Pocock type stopping 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
30 
boundary that assumes that a metformin discontinuation rate of 0.25 is acceptable,
but anything >25% is unacceptable. If the true toxicity rate is equal to 0.25, the 
probability of crossing the boundary is 0.05. 
Stopping Rule
 
Number of Patients, n 1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Boundary, bn
- - -
4 5 5
5 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 9
9 9 10 10 10
Number of Patients, n 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Boundary, bn
11 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 
8.3
Data Analysis Plans
An exact test for a single proportion will be used to test the hypothesis that the CR
rate at 6 months for the group as a whole is greater than 50%. The CR rates at 6 
months for the group as a whole and for the CAH and grade 1 EC patients 
separately will also be estimated and reported along with exact 95% confidence
intervals. Patients who progress at 3 or 6 months will be considered non-
responders and will be included in these analyses. Patients who fail to complete 3 
months of metformin therapy, for reasons unrelated to disease progression or
activity, will not be included. The CR rate at 12 months will also be estimated
and the analysis will include all patients who had at least 3 months of metformin
therapy. 
Patient adherence will be described by the percentage of patients able to adhere to
at least 80% of planned metformin doses over the course of treatment. The
adherence rate will be estimated and reported along with an exact 95% confidence 
interval. All patients who initiated treatment on study will be included in this
analysis. Adverse events will be described by type and grade using frequency
tables.
 
Changes in Ki-67 from baseline to 6 months will be analyzed using a paired t-test
or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test as appropriate. Fisher’s exact tests will be used
to explore associations between expression (via IHC) of the metformin transporter 
proteins and key targets of the metformin/mTOR signaling pathway and CR at 6 
months. Two-sample t-tests will be used to explore associations between
metabolic factors and CR. Correlation coefficients and regression models will be
used to explore associations between metabolic factors and metformin 
concentration levels in tumor tissue. Profiling of metabolites and all associated
metabolomic analyses will be conducted by the UNC NORC/Nutrition Research
Institute Metabolomics Core.
 
9.0
STUDY MANAGEMENT  

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
31 
9.1
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval and Consent 
It is expected that the IRB will have the proper representation and function in
accordance with federally mandated regulations. The IRB should approve the 
consent form and protocol.
In obtaining and documenting informed consent, the investigator should comply
with the applicable regulatory requirement(s), and should adhere to Good Clinical 
Practice (GCP) and to ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration 
of Helsinki.
Before recruitment and enrollment onto this study, the patient will be given a full
explanation of the study and will be given the opportunity to review the consent 
form. Each consent form must include all the relevant elements currently required
by the FDA Regulations and local or state regulations. Once this essential
information has been provided to the patient and the investigator is assured that 
the patient understands the implications of participating in the study, the patient 
will be asked to give consent to participate in the study by signing an
IRB-approved consent form.
 
Prior to a patient’s participation in the trial, the written informed consent form
should be signed and personally dated by the patient and by the person who
conducted the informed consent discussion.
9.2
Required Documentation
Before the study can be initiated at any site, the following documentation must be 
provided to the Clinical Protocol Office (CPO) at the University of North
Carolina.
•
A copy of the official IRB approval letter for the protocol and
informed consent
•
IRB membership list
•
CVs and medical licensure for the principal investigator and any sub-
investigators who will be involved in the study.
•
Form FDA 1572 appropriately filled out and signed with appropriate
documentation (NOTE: this is required if UNC holds the IND.  
Otherwise, the Investigator’s signature documenting understanding of
the protocol and providing commitment that this trial will be
conducted according to all stipulations of the protocol is sufficient to
ensure compliance)
•
CAP and CLIA Laboratory certification numbers and institution lab
normal values
•
Executed clinical research contract
9.3
Registration Procedures 
All patients must be registered with the CPO at the University of North Carolina
before enrollment to study.  For UNC patients, prior to registration, eligibility 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
32 
criteria must be confirmed with the UNC Study Coordinator. To register a patient,
call the Oncology Protocol Office at 919-966-4432 Monday through Friday,
9:00AM-5:00PM.  
For Affiliate patients, to register and confirm patient eligibility, please fax
registration forms, informed consent, and source documents to 919-966-4300, or 
scan and email to the project manager (preferred).
9.4
Data Management and Monitoring/Auditing
The CPO of the UNC LCCC will serve as the coordinating center for this trial.
Data will be collected through a web based clinical research platform, OnCore®.
UNC personnel will coordinate and manage data for quality control assurance and
integrity. 
All data will be collected and entered into OnCore® by Clinical Research 
Associates (CRAs) from UNC LCCC and participating institutions. The
investigators at each site will allow monitors to review all source documents
supporting data entered into OnCore®. The UNCCN Data Coordinator can be
reached at 919-843-2742 or 1-877-668-0683. 
 
As an investigator initiated study, this trial will also be audited by the Lineberger
Cancer Center audit committee every six or twelve months, depending on the
participation of affiliate sites.
9.5
Adherence to the Protocol
Except for an emergency situation in which proper care for the protection, safety, 
and well-being of the study patient requires alternative treatment, the study shall
be conducted exactly as described in the approved protocol.
9.5.1
Emergency Modifications
UNC and Affiliate investigators may implement a deviation from, or a change of, 
the protocol to eliminate an immediate hazard(s) to trial subjects without prior
UNC or their respective institution’s IRB/IEC approval/favorable opinion.
For Institutions Relying on UNC’s IRB: 
For any such emergency modification implemented, a UNC IRB modification 
form must be completed by UNC Research Personnel within five (5) business
days of making the change.
 
For Institutions Relying on Their Own IRB: 
For Affiliate investigators relying on their own institution’s IRB, as soon as
possible after the modification has been made, the implemented deviation or
change and the reasons for it should be submitted to: 
 
•
To UNC Principal Investigator for agreement

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
33 
•
The Affiliate institution’s IRB for review and approval. (Once
IRB’s response is received, this should be forwarded to the
UNCCN Regulatory Associate). 
9.5.2 Single Patient/Subject Exceptions
For Institutions Relying on UNC’s IRB:
Any request to enroll a single subject who does not meet all the eligibility criteria 
of this study requires the approval of the UNC Principal Investigator and the UNC 
IRB.
For Institutions Relying on Their Own IRB: 
Any request to enroll a single subject who does not meet all the eligibility criteria 
of this study requires the approval of the UNC Principal Investigator and the
participating institution’s IRB, per its policy. Please forward the IRB response to
the UNCCN Regulatory Associate by facsimile or via email within 10 business 
days after the original submission.   
9.5.3 Other Protocol Deviations/Violations
According to UNC’s IRB, a protocol deviation is any unplanned variance from an
IRB approved protocol that:
•
Is generally noted or recognized after it occurs 
•
Has no substantive effect on the risks to research participants
•
Has no substantive effect on the scientific integrity of the research plan 
or the value of the data collected
•
Did not result from willful or knowing misconduct on the part of the
investigator(s).
An unplanned protocol variance is considered a violation if the variance meets
any of the following criteria:
•
Has harmed or increased the risk of harm to one or more research
participants.
•
Has damaged the scientific integrity of the data collected for the study.
•
Results from willful or knowing misconduct on the part of the
investigator(s).
•
Demonstrates serious or continuing noncompliance with federal
regulations, State laws, or University policies.
If a deviation or violation occurs please follow the guidelines below: 
 
For Institutions Relying on UNC’s IRB:
Protocol Deviations: UNC or Affiliate personnel will record the deviation in
OnCore®, and report to any sponsor or data and safety monitoring committee in
accordance with their policies.  Deviations should be summarized and reported to
the IRB at the time of continuing review.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
34 
Protocol Violations: Violations should be reported by UNC personnel within one
(1) week of the investigator becoming aware of the event using the same IRB 
online mechanism used to report Unanticipated Problems.   
For Institutions Relying on Their Own IRB:
In addition to adhering to the policies regarding protocol compliance set forth by 
your institution’s IRB, the following is also required: 
Protocol Deviations: In the event a deviation from protocol procedures is
identified, record the deviation in OnCore®. 
 
Protocol Violations: Any protocol violation that occurs must be reported to your
IRB per institutional policies and reported to the UNCCN Project Manager within
5 days. UNC-CH will determine if the violation affects the safety of the patient
and integrity of the data. Once your institution’s IRB response is received, please 
forward to the UNCCN Regulatory Associate.
Unanticipated Problems:
 
Affiliate Sites:
Any events that meet the criteria for “Unanticipated Problems (UPs)” as defined
by UNC’s IRB must also be reported to the UNCCN Project Manager. The
UNCCN Project Manager will report the event to the UNC IRB using the IRB’s
web-based reporting system.  Examples of such UPs include a lost or stolen 
laptop computer that contains sensitive study information.
UNC 
Any events that meet the criteria for “Unanticipated Problems” as defined by 
UNC’s IRB must be reported by the Study Coordinator using the IRB’s web-
based reporting system.
9.6
Amendments to the Protocol
Should amendments to the protocol be required, the amendments will be 
originated and documented by the Principal Investigator at UNC. It should also 
be noted that when an amendment to the protocol substantially alters the study
design or the potential risk to the patient, a revised consent form might be
required.   
 
For Institutions Relying on UNC’s IRB:
The written amendment, and if required the amended consent form, must be sent
to UNC’s IRB for approval prior to implementation.
 
For Institutions Relying on Their Own IRB:
Investigators must submit the approved amendment to their institution’s IRB for
approval.  For multi-center studies, any multicenter site must submit their
informed consent revisions to the Multicenter Regulatory Associate prior to
submission to their IRB.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
35 
9.7
Record Retention
Study documentation includes all eCRFs, data correction forms or queries, source 
documents, Sponsor-Investigator correspondence, monitoring logs/letters, and 
regulatory documents (e.g., protocol and amendments, IRB correspondence and
approval, signed patient consent forms).
 
Source documents include all recordings of observations or notations of clinical 
activities and all reports and records necessary for the evaluation and
reconstruction of the clinical research study.
 
Government agency regulations and directives require that all study
documentation pertaining to the conduct of a clinical trial must be retained by the
study investigator. In the case of a study with a drug seeking regulatory approval
and marketing, these documents shall be retained for at least two years after the 
last approval of marketing application in an International Conference on 
Harmonization (ICH) region. In all other cases, study documents should be kept
on file until three years after the completion and final study report of this
investigational study. 
9.8
Obligations of Investigators
The Principal Investigator is responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial at the 
site in accordance with Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations and/or the
Declaration of Helsinki. The Principal Investigator is responsible for personally
overseeing the treatment of all study patients.  The Principal Investigator must 
assure that all study site personnel, including sub-investigators and other study 
staff members, adhere to the study protocol and all FDA/GCP/NCI regulations
and guidelines regarding clinical trials both during and after study completion.
 
The Principal Investigator at each institution or site will be responsible for 
assuring that all the required data will be collected and entered into the eCRFs.
Periodically, monitoring visits will be conducted and the Principal Investigator
will provide access to his/her original records to permit verification of proper 
entry of data. At the completion of the study, all eCRFs will be reviewed by the
Principal Investigator and will require his/her final signature to verify the
accuracy of the data.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
36 
10.0 REFERENCES 
       
1.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: a cancer journal 
for clinicians. 2013;63(1):11-30.
2.
Reed SD, Newton KM, Clinton WL, Epplein M, Garcia R, Allison K, et al.
Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 
2009;200(6):678 e1-6. 
3.
Rakha E, Wong SC, Soomro I, Chaudry Z, Sharma A, Deen S, et al. Clinical
outcome of atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosed on an endometrial biopsy:
institutional experience and review of literature. The American journal of surgical 
pathology. 2012;36(11):1683-90. Epub 2012/10/18.
4.
Zaino RJ, Kauderer J, Trimble CL, Silverberg SG, Curtin JP, Lim PC, et al.
Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic
Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2006;106(4):804-11. Epub 2006/01/10.
5.
Bergstrom A, Pisani P, Tenet V, Wolk A, Adami HO. Overweight as an avoidable 
cause of cancer in Europe. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer.
2001;91(3):421-30. 
6.
Fader AN, Arriba LN, Frasure HE, von Gruenigen VE. Endometrial cancer and 
obesity: epidemiology, biomarkers, prevention and survivorship. Gynecologic oncology.
2009;114(1):121-7.
7.
von Gruenigen VE, Gil KM, Frasure HE, Jenison EL, Hopkins MP. The impact of
obesity and age on quality of life in gynecologic surgery. American journal of obstetrics
and gynecology. 2005;193(4):1369-75.
8.
Soliman PT, Wu D, Tortolero-Luna G, Schmeler KM, Slomovitz BM, Bray MS,
et al. Association between adiponectin, insulin resistance, and endometrial cancer. 
Cancer. 2006;106(11):2376-81. 
9.
Chia VM, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM. Obesity, diabetes, and
other factors in relation to survival after endometrial cancer diagnosis. International
Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2007;17(2):441-6.
10. 
Cust AE, Kaaks R, Friedenreich C, Bonnet F, Laville M, Lukanova A, et al. 
Plasma adiponectin levels and endometrial cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal
women. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2007;92(1):255-63.
11. 
Friberg E, Mantzoros CS, Wolk A. Diabetes and risk of endometrial cancer: a
population-based prospective cohort study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & 
prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored
by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2007;16(2):276-80.
12. 
Gunderson CC, Fader AN, Carson KA, Bristow RE. Oncologic and reproductive 
outcomes with progestin therapy in women with endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 
adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecologic oncology. 2012;125(2):477-82.
13.
Hubbs JL, Saig RM, Abaid LN, Bae-Jump VL, Gehrig PA. Systemic and local
hormone therapy for endometrial hyperplasia and early adenocarcinoma. Obstetrics and 
gynecology. 2013;121(6):1172-80. 

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
37 
14.
Albert JM, Kim KW, Cao C, Lu B. Targeting the Akt/mammalian target of
rapamycin pathway for radiosensitization of breast cancer. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 
2006;5(5):1183-9.
15.
Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker
EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or
metformin. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(6):393-403. 
16. 
Ratner RE, Christophi CA, Metzger BE, Dabelea D, Bennett PH, Pi-Sunyer X, et
al. Prevention of diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes: effects of
metformin and lifestyle interventions. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and
metabolism. 2008;93(12):4774-9.
17. 
Bowker SL, Majumdar SR, Veugelers P, Johnson JA. Increased cancer-related 
mortality for patients with type 2 diabetes who use sulfonylureas or insulin. Diabetes
care. 2006;29(2):254-8.
18. 
Evans JM, Donnelly LA, Emslie-Smith AM, Alessi DR, Morris AD. Metformin 
and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. Bmj. 2005;330(7503):1304-5. 
19.
Libby G, Donnelly LA, Donnan PT, Alessi DR, Morris AD, Evans JM. New users
of metformin are at low risk of incident cancer: a cohort study among people with type 2
diabetes. Diabetes care. 2009;32(9):1620-5.
20. 
Ko EM, Paige W, Clark L, Jackson AL, Franasiak J, Havrilesky L, et al. 
Metformin reduces recurrence and improves survival in endometrial cancers. Presented
as the 2013 Annual Clinical Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Los
Angeles, CA. 2013. 
21. 
An HJ, Lee YH, Cho NH, Shim JY, Kim JY, Lee C, et al. Alteration of PTEN
expression in endometrial carcinoma is associated with down-regulation of cyclin-
dependent kinase inhibitor, p27. Histopathology. 2002;41(5):437-45.
22. 
Contreras CM, Gurumurthy S, Haynie JM, Shirley LJ, Akbay EA, Wingo SN, et 
al. Loss of Lkb1 provokes highly invasive endometrial adenocarcinomas. Cancer
research. 2008;68(3):759-66.
23.
Mutter GL, Lin MC, Fitzgerald JT, Kum JB, Baak JP, Lees JA, et al. Altered
PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. Journal 
of the National Cancer Institute. 2000;92(11):924-30. 
24.
Cantrell LA, Zhou C, Mendivil A, Malloy KM, Gehrig PA, Bae-Jump VL.
Metformin is a potent inhibitor of endometrial cancer cell proliferation--implications for
a novel treatment strategy. Gynecologic oncology. 2010;116(1):92-8.
25. 
Erdemoglu E, Guney M, Giray SG, Take G, Mungan T. Effects of metformin on 
mammalian target of rapamycin in a mouse model of endometrial hyperplasia. European
journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2009;145(2):195-9.
26. 
Session DR, Kalli KR, Tummon IS, Damario MA, Dumesic DA. Treatment of 
atypical endometrial hyperplasia with an insulin-sensitizing agent. Gynecological 
endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological
Endocrinology. 2003;17(5):405-7.
27. 
Shen ZQ, Zhu HT, Lin JF. Reverse of progestin-resistant atypical endometrial 
hyperplasia by metformin and oral contraceptives. Obstetrics and gynecology. 
2008;112(2 Pt 2):465-7.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
38 
28.
Zhang Z, Dong L, Sui L, Yang Y, Liu X, Yu Y, et al. Metformin reverses
progestin resistance in endometrial cancer cells by downregulating GloI expression.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2011;21(2):213-21. 
29.
Hadad S, Iwamoto T, Jordan L, Purdie C, Bray S, Baker L, et al. Evidence for
biological effects of metformin in operable breast cancer: a pre-operative, window-of-
opportunity, randomized trial. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2011;128(3):783-94. 
30. 
MacKenzie MJ, Ernst S, Johnson C, Winquist E. A phase I study of temsirolimus 
and metformin in advanced solid tumours. Investigational new drugs. 2012;30(2):647-52.
31.
Hanna RK, Zhou C, Malloy KM, Sun L, Zhong Y, Gehrig PA, et al. Metformin
potentiates the effects of paclitaxel in endometrial cancer cells through inhibition of cell 
proliferation and modulation of the mTOR pathway. Gynecologic oncology. 
2012;125(2):458-69.
32.
Schuler KM, Rambally BS, DiFurio MJ, Gehrig PA, Bae-Jump V. A Pre-
operative Window Study of Metformin for the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer. To be 
Presented at 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual 
Meeting, Chicago, IL, June 2013. 2013.
33.
Wang DS, Jonker JW, Kato Y, Kusuhara H, Schinkel AH, Sugiyama Y.
Involvement of organic cation transporter 1 in hepatic and intestinal distribution of 
metformin. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 
2002;302(2):510-5. Epub 2002/07/20.
34.
Kimura N, Masuda S, Tanihara Y, Ueo H, Okuda M, Katsura T, et al. Metformin
is a superior substrate for renal organic cation transporter OCT2 rather than hepatic 
OCT1. Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. 2005;20(5):379-86. Epub 2005/11/08. 
35.
Kimura N, Okuda M, Inui K. Metformin transport by renal basolateral organic
cation transporter hOCT2. Pharmaceutical research. 2005;22(2):255-9. Epub 2005/03/24.
36. 
Terada T, Masuda S, Asaka J, Tsuda M, Katsura T, Inui K. Molecular cloning, 
functional characterization and tissue distribution of rat H+/organic cation antiporter 
MATE1. Pharmaceutical research. 2006;23(8):1696-701. Epub 2006/07/20.
37.
Masuda S, Terada T, Yonezawa A, Tanihara Y, Kishimoto K, Katsura T, et al.
Identification and functional characterization of a new human kidney-specific H+/organic
cation antiporter, kidney-specific multidrug and toxin extrusion 2. Journal of the 
American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2006;17(8):2127-35. Epub 2006/06/30.
38.
Zhou M, Xia L, Wang J. Metformin transport by a newly cloned proton-
stimulated organic cation transporter (plasma membrane monoamine transporter) 
expressed in human intestine. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of
chemicals. 2007;35(10):1956-62. Epub 2007/06/30.
39.
Han T, Proctor W, Costales C, Everett R, Thakker D. The role of organic cation
transporter 1 (OCT1) and plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT) in 
metformin apical uptake in Caco-2 cells. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the
American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists. 2011.
40.
Norwood DK, Chilipko AA, Amin SM, Macharia D, Still KL. Evaluating the
potential benefits of metformin in patients with cardiovascular disease and heart failure. 
The Consultant pharmacist : the journal of the American Society of Consultant 
Pharmacists. 2013;28(9):579-83. Epub 2013/09/07.

LCCC 1326 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
PI/Version Date: Bae-Jump/May 15, 2020 
 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
 
 
 
39 
41.
Rachmani R, Slavachevski I, Levi Z, Zadok B, Kedar Y, Ravid M. Metformin in
patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: reconsideration of traditional contraindications. 
European journal of internal medicine. 2002;13(7):428. Epub 2002/10/18. 
42.
Widen EI, Eriksson JG, Groop LC. Metformin normalizes nonoxidative glucose
metabolism in insulin-resistant normoglycemic first-degree relatives of patients with
NIDDM. Diabetes. 1992;41(3):354-8.
43. 
Gudat U, Convent G, Heinemann L. Metformin and exercise: no additive effect 
on blood lactate levels in health volunteers. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British
Diabetic Association. 1997;14(2):138-42.
44. 
Rizkalla SW, Elgrably F, Tchobroutsky G, Slama G. Effects of metformin 
treatment on erythrocyte insulin binding in normal weight subjects, in obese non diabetic 
subjects, in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabete & metabolisme. 1986;12(4):219-
24.
45. 
Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, Kaushik M, Fang X, Miller WJ, et al. 
Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after
surgery. Circulation. 2011;124(4):381-7.
46.
Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse RA, et al. Development
and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest.
2011;140(5):1207-15. 
47.
Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK. Accuracy of outpatient
endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative
review. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2002;109(3):313-
21. 
48.
Moberger B, Nilsson S, Palmstierna S, Redvall L, Sternby N. A multicenter study
comparing two endometrial sampling devices--Medscand Endorette and Pipelle de
Cornier. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 1998;77(7):764-9.
49. 
Polena V, Mergui JL, Zerat L, Sananes S. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in 
endometrial disease diagnosis. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and
reproductive biology. 2007;134(2):233-7.
50. 
Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brolmann HA, Heintz AP. The accuracy of endometrial 
sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a 
meta-analysis. Cancer. 2000;89(8):1765-72.
51.
Ma B, Li X, Li J, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Yang X, et al. Quantitative analysis of
tenuifolin concentrations in rat plasma and tissue using LC-MS/MS: Application to
pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution study. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical 
analysis. 2013;88C:191-200. Epub 2013/09/24.