Phase IB/II Open-label Single Arm Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Tucatinib in Combination With Palbociclib and Letrozole in Subjects With Hormone Receptor Positive and HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Breast Cancer
Sponsor: University of Colorado, Denver

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 1 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CLINICAL PROTOCOL  
 
PHASE IB/II OPEN-LABEL SINGLE ARM STUDY TO EVALUATE SAFETY AND 
EFFICACY OF TUCATINIB IN COMBINATION WITH LETROZOLE AND 
PALBOCICLIB IN SUBJECTS WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE  
AND HER2-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lead Principal Investigator:  
Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Phone: 303-724-0083; fax: 303-024-3889 
 
 
 
 
 
12801 East 17th Avenue, Mail Stop 8117  
 
 
 
 
 
Room 8101A, Aurora, CO, 80045 
 
 
 
 
 
Elena.Shagisultanova@ucdenver.edu 
 
 
Sponsor: 
 
 
 
Criterium, Inc 
 
 
 
 
 
Phone: 518-583-0095 
 
 
 
 
 
358 Broadway, Suite 201 
 
 
 
 
 
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 
 
 
 
 
 
17BR01PM@criteriuminc.com 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Version date:  
 
 
3.23.2020 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 2 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
Sponsor Signature Page 
 
The signature below constitutes approval of this protocol by the signatory on behalf of Criterium, 
Inc. 
 
 
Lead Principal Investigator:     ___Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD______________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Print/Type Name  
 
Date:    
 
 
 
 
Signature:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 3 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PROTOCOL NUMBER: 
COMIRB 16-1661, CRITERIUM 17BR01 
 
PROTOCOL TITLE: 
PHASE IB/II OPEN-LABEL SINGLE ARM STUDY TO 
EVALUATE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUCATINIB IN 
COMBINATION WITH LETROZOLE AND PALBOCICLIB IN 
SUBJECTS WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE AND 
HER2-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER 
 
Lead Principal Investigator: Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD 
University of Colorado Denver 
 
Sponsor:  
Criterium, Inc. 
 
 
Investigator Agreement 
 
I have read this protocol and agree that the trial will be carried out in accordance with Good 
Clinical Practice (GCP) as required by applicable United States (US) laws and applications, 
including but not limited to United States (US) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) applicable to 
clinical studies (45 CFR Part 46, 21 CFR Part 50, 21 CFR Part 56, 21 CFR Part 312, and/or 21 
CFR Part 812).  
 
 
I will assure that no changes to the protocol will take place without documented approval from the 
Institutional Review Board (IRB). All personnel involved in the conduct of this study have 
completed Human Subjects Protection Training.  
 
 
I agree to ensure that all staff members involved in the conduct of this study are informed about 
their obligations in meeting the above commitments.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Site Principal Investigator:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
 
Print/Type Name  
 
Date:    
 
 
 
 
Signature:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 4 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
STUDY SYNOPSIS  
 
Concept and Rationale 
Dual overexpression of the HER2-neu oncogene and hormone receptors (HR) is found in 
approximately 10% of all breast carcinomas [1, 2]. These cancers represent a significant 
therapeutic challenge because of a bi-directional cross-talk between the estrogen receptor (ER) and 
HER2 pathways leading to accelerated tumor progression and resistance to targeted therapy [3, 4]. 
Preclinical and clinical data strongly suggest that HER2 overexpression by breast tumors confers 
an intrinsic resistance to anti-hormonal treatment [2, 5-7], while HR expression is similarly 
associated with decreased response to HER2-targeted agents [4, 8, 9]. However, at present, 
endocrine therapy is a standard first line treatment for asymptomatic subjects with metastatic HR- 
positive (HR+) breast cancer, regardless of the tumor HER2 status [10]. In cell line experiments 
and murine xenograft models, HER2-targeted agents combined with endocrine therapy showed 
synergy in suppressing the growth of HR+/HER2+ breast tumors [8, 11]. Several phase III clinical 
trials combining anti-hormonal therapy with HER2-targeted agents have been performed with 
modest results [12, 13]. These trials showed statistically significant improvement of progression 
free survival (PFS) in subjects with HR+/HER2+ tumors receiving endocrine therapy combined 
with HER2-targeted agents, comparing to endocrine therapy alone. However, these trials were not 
practice changing because the PFS benefits were small, and no overall survival benefits were 
demonstrated. Thus, there is a strong pre-clinical and clinical rationale for evaluation of improved, 
rationally designed drug combinations targeting HR and HER2 pathways in women with 
HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. 
 
Activation of cell cycle checkpoints (cyclin D1 and CDK4/6 complex) downstream of HR and 
HER2 pathways plays an important role in the tumorigenesis of HR+/HER2+ breast tumors [14-
16]. Mitogenic signaling from both HER2 and HR receptors converges at cell cycle checkpoints 
and results in the increased Cyclin D1 expression. The frequency of Cyclin D1 amplification and 
CDK4 gain are higher in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer comparing to other breast cancer subtypes 
[17]. In mouse models, deletion of cyclin D1 limits the development of HER2-driven tumors [18, 
19]. Palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, is FDA approved in combination with letrozole in post- 
menopausal women with HR+/HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer, based on improvement of 
PFS demonstrated in the PALOMA-1 clinical trial [20]. In preclinical studies, palbociclib was 
active against both luminal A (HR+/HER2-) and luminal B (HR+/HER2+) breast tumors, and 
synergized with both tamoxifen and anti-HER2 agents (trastuzumab, lapatinib, and TDM-1) 
providing a potent addition to anti-hormonal and HER2-targeted therapies [14, 16, 21]. Therefore, 
testing the triple combination of anti-endocrine, CDK4/6 targeted and HER2-targeted agents for 
HR+/HER2+ breast cancer is a rational approach with potential high impact to the breast cancer field. 
 
We hypothesized that in women with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, treatment with a 
novel HER2-targeted agent tucatinib, combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor 
palbociclib and an 
aromatase inhibitor letrozole will result in synergistic suppression of tumor growth and improved 
PFS. Tucatinib is a potent oral small-molecule inhibitor highly selective for HER2 receptor 
tyrosine kinase. With a 500-fold increase in potency for HER2 inhibition compared to closely 
related kinase EGFR, tucatinib inhibits HER2 signaling while avoiding EGFR-related side effects 
(skin rash and gastrointestinal toxicity) typical of less selective inhibitors such as lapatinib, 
neratinib and afatinib [22]. Tucatinib has been tested in multiple phase I clinical trials showing 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 5 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
significant antitumor activity and favorable toxicity profile [23-25]. Notably, tucatinib penetrates 
through the blood brain barrier and is active in patients with brain metastases. 
 
Tucatinib and palbociclib have largely non-overlapping toxicity profiles. The most common side 
effects of palbociclib are neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia, while the most common adverse 
event caused by tucatinib is asymptomatic transaminatis. Non-overlapping toxicity profiles 
taken together with potentially synergistic mechanism of action of palbociclib and tucatinib 
provide rationale for combining these agents with letrozole in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast 
cancer. 
 
This study is a multicenter, single arm, open-label, run-in phase Ib safety cohort with immediate 
roll over to a phase II clinical trial that will test the combination therapy of tucatinib with 
palbociclib and letrozole in subjects with HR+/HER2+ locally advanced unresectable or metastatic 
breast cancer. As described above, tucatinib has been tested in metastatic HER2+ breast cancer in 
several phase I/Ib clinical trials, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 
300 mg PO BID. In this clinical trial, we will first confirm the tolerability of tucatinib given at 
MTD with standard doses of palbociclib (125 mg daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off 
treatment) and letrozole (2.5 mg PO daily). In phase II part of this trial, we will expand the testing 
of this drug combination in subjects with metastatic HR+/HER2+ breast cancer to determine the 
PFS rate. In addition to the rationale for the synergy of targeting these three pathways 
simultaneously in this disease setting and its potential for anti-tumor efficacy, we propose this 
novel combination of three oral agents, if well tolerated, will be highly patient-centered as an 
effective non-chemotherapy based regimen for treatment of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. 
 
Phase Ib  
 
Primary objective 
• To evaluate safety and tolerability of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and 
letrozole, and to confirm that current RP2D of tucatinib and FDA approved dosing of 
palbociclib remain the same in the triplet combination  
 
Secondary objectives 
• To perform an assessment of pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tucatinib and palbociclib  
• To assess preliminary efficacy of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and 
letrozole 
 
Primary endpoint 
• Safety and tolerability of combination therapy as evaluated by standard NCI-CTCAE 
version 4.03 
 
Secondary endpoints 
• Tucatinib and palbociclib plasma concentrations measured during the first and second 
cycle of therapy 
• Assessment of progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time from allocation to the 
first documented disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 [26]  (Appendix C), or 
death due to any cause, whichever occurs first 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 6 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
• For subjects with brain metastatic disease enrolled in the study, assessment of bi-
compartmental PFS in the non-CNS and CNS compartments, defined as the time from 
allocation to the first documented disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 [26] and 
RANO-BM criteria [27] (Appendix C), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first 
• Assessment of tumor response – complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable 
disease (SD) of 6 month or longer in duration – by RECIST 1.1 (for subjects with CNS 
disease by RECIST 1.1 and RANO-BM); overall response rate (ORR) defined as 
proportion of subjects who had CR or PR; clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as proportion 
of subjects with CR, PR and SD; duration of response (DOR) defined as the time from 
enrollment into clinical trial until objective tumor progression or death whichever occurs first 
 
Phase II part 
 
Primary objective 
• To assess efficacy of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and letrozole by PFS 
 
Secondary objectives 
• To evaluate efficacy of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and letrozole by 
ORR, CBR and DOR 
• To evaluate safety and tolerability of the combination therapy 
 
Primary endpoint 
• PFS, defined as the time from allocation to the first documented disease progression 
according to RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first 
• For subjects with brain metastatic disease enrolled in the study, assessment of bi-
compartmental PFS in the non-CNS and CNS compartments, defined as the time from 
allocation to the first documented disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 and 
RANO-BM criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first 
 
Secondary endpoints 
• Assessment of response – CR, PR, or SD of 6 month or longer in duration - according to 
RECIST 1.1 (for subjects with CNS disease by RECIST 1.1 and RANO-BM); assessment 
of ORR (CR and PR), CBR (CR, PR and SD), and DOR.  
• Incidence, nature and severity of all AEs that occur on or after C1D1 of therapy 
• Additional late time point PK assessment of palbociclib and tucatinib 
 
Scientific endpoints / correlative studies for phase IB and phase II 
 
Exploratory assessment of potential biomarkers of resistance and response measured before 
treatment, after 1 treatment cycle, and at disease progression: 
• Assessment of selective markers by IHC in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) 
tumor blocks – such as cyclin E, CDK2, retinoblastoma protein (RB), p16, HER3, total 
AKT, phospho-AKT, and others as decided by results or advances in the field  
• Changes in tumor RNA expression profiles obtained by mRNA Next Generation 
sequencing in fresh frozen biopsy samples 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 7 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
• Transcript alterations as assessed by mRNA Next Generation sequencing in fresh frozen 
biopsy samples 
• Analysis of tumor specific mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by digital PCR, 
including activating mutations in estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and HER2 genes, and selected 
mutations revealed by mRNA sequencing, as well as analysis of other circulating markers 
associated with cancer prognosis or outcomes from treatment 
• Correlation between tumor PAM50 subtypes and efficacy of therapy 
 
Study Design 
Fig 1. Study schema:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     Phase Ib 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     Phase II 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subjects 1-10 enrolled at dose level 1 (DL1) 
Interim safety analysis 
Dose confirmation with option for de-escalation to lower 
DL if toxicity or PK interactions determine need  
Subjects 11-20 enrolled at determined DL 
Final phase I safety analysis, determination of RP2Ds 
Enrollment and treatment of subjects 21-40 at RP2Ds 
Final safety and efficacy analysis 
Enrollment 
Screening 
Tucatinib 300 mg PO BID* 
Letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily* 
Optional tumor biopsy    
Research blood sample 
Optional tumor biopsy    
Research blood sample 
Palbociclib 125 mg PO daily* 
Cycle 1 
Further 
cycles 
End of 
study 
Optional tumor biopsy 
Research blood sample   
*Doses shown for DL1 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 8 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
This is a multicenter, single arm, open-label, run-in Phase Ib / roll-over phase II study of tucatinib 
in combination letrozole and palbociclib in subjects with HR+/HER2+ locally advanced 
unresectable, or metastatic breast cancer. Premenopausal women may enroll into the study if on 
treatment with or willing to be treated with standard ovarian suppression. After signing informed 
consent, completing baseline assessments and meeting all eligibility criteria, the subjects will start 
treatment. Treatment will be administered in cycles of 28 days each and consist of tucatinib 300 
mg PO BID, palbociclib 125 mg PO daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off, and letrozole 2.5 
mg PO daily – doses indicated for dose level 1 (DL1). Dose modifications of tucatinib, palbociclib 
and letrozole will be allowed (as outlined below). Treatment will continue until unacceptable 
toxicity, disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study closure. In the absence of clear 
evidence of clinical or radiographic progression, all efforts should be made to continue treatment 
until unequivocal evidence of radiologic or clinical progression occurs. 
 
Safety analysis of the combination therapy 
 
Incidence, nature and severity of all AEs that occur on therapy will be analyzed, with particular 
attention to dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). DLT is a side effect attributed to a study drug or drug 
combination that is serious enough to meaningfully affect the safety of the study subject. Any drug 
toxicity listed below is a DLT: 
• 
Any death not clearly due to the underlying disease or extraneous causes 
• 
Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity 
• 
Symptomatic CHF 
• 
Liver toxicity meeting Hy's law  
• 
Grade 3 neutropenia with fever 
• 
Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding 
• 
Any grade 4 anemia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia 
All AEs of the specified grades should count as DLTs except those that are clearly and 
incontrovertibly due to disease progression or extraneous causes. Repeated episodes of grade 3 
neutropenia interfering with drug administration and necessitating dose reduction of study 
medications, or other serious toxicity that, in the opinion of the investigator merits dose reduction 
of the study drugs, or discontinuation of palbociclib or letrozole according to good clinical 
practice, will qualify for DLT and should lead to dose modifications of study drugs per protocol.   
 
The following adverse events do not represent DLTs: 
• Alopecia of any grade 
• Grade 3 nausea/vomiting or diarrhea WITHOUT adequate use of antiemetic or anti-
diarrheals that improves with optimal medical management in < 72hrs 
• Grade 3 fatigue lasting ≤ 7 days 
• Grade 3 rash WITHOUT optimal use of topical corticosteroids or anti-infectives that 
improves with medical management in <72hrs 
• ≥ Grade 3 electrolyte abnormality that lasts < 72 hours that is not clinically complicated, 
and returns to Grade ≤1 spontaneously or after conventional medical interventions  
• ≥ Grade 3 amylase or lipase elevation that is not associated with symptoms or clinical 
manifestations of pancreatitis  
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 9 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
In this study, the proportion of patients experiencing DLTs will be analyzed during the first and 
second interim safety analyses. Attribution of the DLTs to specific study drug(s) will be performed 
as described in section 6.2 of the protocol. A DLT experienced by a study subject will always 
necessitate dose modification and/or interruption of therapy with the study drug(s) for this subject 
as described in section 6.3 of the protocol. Proportion of patients that experienced DLTs prior to 
the first interim safety analysis will determine if the study meets pre-specified safety thresholds, 
and whether de-escalation of the study drug doses to lower dose levels is needed. Analysis of DLTs 
experienced by all patients enrolled in phase I part of the study will determine the outcomes of the 
second interim safety analysis, and whether the combination of tucatinib, letrozole and palbociclib 
demonstrates adequate safety profile allowing to proceed to phase II.  
 
As a signal of lack of safety and tolerability of combination therapy, we will look into the 
proportion of subjects experiencing DLTs secondary to toxicity of tucatinib and/or palbociclib. 
The known frequency of DLTs for palbociclib as standard of care therapy when administered in 
combination with letrozole in the current FDA approved setting are significantly higher than the 
current dose reduction rates experienced with tucatinib to date. Therefore, the study will be 
structured to identify an overall clinically meaningful increase in the expected toxicity of 
palbociclib and/or tucatinib as follows: safety will be considered clinically meaningfully altered 
if 60% or greater proportion of subjects experience DLTs secondary to the toxicity of palbociclib, 
or 20% or greater proportion of subjects experience DLTs due to of tucatinib, or 50% or greater 
proportion of subjects experience DLTs  that can be potentially attributed to both tucatinib and 
palbociclib (Tables 1 and 2).  
 
Table 1. Baseline and expected toxicities of palbociclib and tucatinib 
 
Toxicity attributable  
to a drug 
Baseline rate of DLTs s with 
single agent therapy 
Rate of DLTs triggering 
safety 
concern of combination therapy trial 
palbociclib 
45% [20] 
≥60% 
tucatinib 
10% [22] 
≥20% 
potentially 
attributable 
to both tucatinib 
and 
palbociclib 
 
≥50% 
 
Table 2. Safety boundaries for phase Ib part of the trial 
 
Drug 
Confidence level 
N* 
Rate 
Upper limit CI 
n** 
palbociclib 
0.9 
10 
0.6 
0.812 
8 out of 10 
20 
0.6 
0.751 
15 out of 20 
tucatinib 
0.9 
10 
0.2 
0.408 
4 out of 10 
20 
0.2 
0.347 
7 out of 20 
both drugs 
0.9 
10 
0.5 
0.760 
8 out of 10 
20 
0.5 
0.694 
14 out of 20 
*N – total number of subjects; **n – number of subjects experiencing DLTs due to palbocic lib 
and/or tucatinib that is set as a safety boundary 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 10 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
 
Table 3. Pre-planned dose levels (DLs) for subjects in phase Ib part of the study 
 
DLs 
Drug doses 
Subjects treated 
DL1 
tucatinib 300 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 1-10 treated at DL1 
DL -1 
tucatinib 300 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 100 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if palbociclib 
toxicity increased) 
DL -2 
tucatinib 250 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if tucatinib 
toxicity increased) 
DL -3 
tucatinib 250 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 100 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if  palbociclib 
and tucatinib toxicity increased, 
or unattributable toxicity) 
DL -4 
tucatinib 250 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if PKs indicate a 
significant change to the 
metabolism of tucatinib)* 
DL -5 
tucatinib 200 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if PKs indicate a 
significant change to the 
metabolism of tucatinib)* 
*Significant PK changes regardless of noted clinical toxicities 
 
To determine the safety of the triple combination, we will plan to enroll 10 subjects at the baseline 
starting doses (DL1) of tucatinib 300 mg PO BID, palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 days on and 7 
days off, and letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily on a 28 day cycle length (Table 3). 
 
After 10 subjects are accrued to the study and complete at least 1 cycle of treatment, we will 
perform an interim analysis of the safety phase Ib cohort. We anticipate that DLTs will likely be 
more attributable to palbociclib than tucatinib, but unbiased assessment of the toxicities will 
be performed. Based on the known rates of dose limiting toxicities to date, as outlined in the 
table above, the following plan is outlined: 
 
10 subjects enrolled, completed at least one cycle of treatment (28 days) and evaluable for safety 
analysis: 
 
If there are 7 or fewer subjects experience DLTs due to palbociclib, 3 or fewer subjects 
experience DLTs due to tucatinib, and 7 or fewer subjects experience DLTs potentially 
attributable to both drugs, then the interim safety of the Phase Ib cohort will be considered 
acceptable and accrual will continue to enroll to 20 subjects without change of the starting doses. 
Otherwise, we will de-escalate to the next dose levels. 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 11 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Scenario 1: Palbociclib toxicity increased 
If 8 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects experience DLTs attributable to palbociclib, the 
palbociclib starting dose will be decreased to 100 mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off for the 
subsequent 10 subject in the safety run in phase Ib cohort. Tucatinib starting dose will not be 
changed (DL -1).  
 
Scenario 2: Tucatinib toxicity increased 
If 4 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects experience DLTs due to tucatinib, we will proceed 
with a starting dose reduction of tucatinib to 250 mg PO BID and leave palbociclib starting dose 
unchanged (DL -2).  
 
Scenario 3: Increased toxicity potentially attributable to both drugs: 
If there is a lack of clarity or an apparent combination of DLTs that may be attributed to both 
tucatinib and palbociclib in 8 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects, then a combined starting 
dose reduction of tucatinib to 250 mg PO daily and palbociclib to 100 mg PO daily 21 days on and 
7 days off will occur (DL -3).  
 
Incorporation of PKs in safety analysis: 
Both tucatinib and palbociclib PK data were considered during the first interim safety analysis.  
Based on the information available prior to phase I of the study, we did not expect significant 
changes in palbociclib PKs. With palbociclib being a weak time dependent CYP3A4 inhibitor, 
there was a possibility of tucatinib PK changes. Therefore, the dose levels were designed 
accordingly: if PKs would be suggesting of a significant change to the metabolism of tucatinib, 
adjusting to the lower dose levels (DL -4 and DL -5) regardless of noted clinical toxicities was 
planned. 
 
Based on the existing data for these drugs available prior to initiation of the study, and the non-
overlapping toxicity profiles, it was not anticipated that greater than one dose reduction of either 
or both tucatinib and palbociclib would need to occur to determine the safe combination of drugs 
to move forward into phase II. If accrual to subjects 11-20 of the phase Ib cohort would 
demonstrate a level of dose limiting toxicity equal or above the threshold of 15/20 subjects for 
palbociclib attributable DLTs, 7/20 subjects with tucatinib attributable DLTs, or 14/20 subjects 
where DLTs were potentially attributable to both tucatinib and palbociclib (Table 2), or if PKs for 
subjects 11-20 would be suggestive of clinically significant changes in the drug metabolism, then 
consideration of additional drug specific dose reductions would occur and enrollment in the phase 
Ib safety cohort would proceed to an additional 10 subjects. Protocol modification and amendment 
would occur with specific details of the subsequent enrollment and safety analysis planned if this 
unlikely events were to happen. 
 
Letrozole dose will be kept constant for all study subjects throughout the study. Worsening of 
estrogen withdrawal symptoms are not anticipated to be increased through the drug combinations 
nor meaningfully effect the safety assessment of the protocol, as the timing of onset of many AI-
based symptoms occurs months to years into the treatment. However, if a subject develops known 
AI dependent AEs of grade ≥3 (consistent with the definition of DLT), which we expect will occur 
at a frequency of 4-6% [20], the subject may choose to discontinue AI therapy. Subjects who 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 12 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
discontinue letrozole may opt to remain on protocol if they continue taking both tucatinib and 
palbociclib, and if it is felt to be in their best clinical interest.  
 
The study has completed the final phase Ib safety analysis on January 31, 2019. Based on the data 
from the final phase Ib safety analysis, it has been determined that the study did not cross safety 
thresholds, and full doses of tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole are reasonably well tolerated. 
Therefore,  the recommended phase II doses (RP2D) were declared as tucatinib 300 mg PO BID; 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 days on followed by 7 days off; and letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
(DL1).  
 
However, after the study was re-opened for phase II on January 31 2019, new information on 
tucatinib became available via Safety Letter from Seattle Genetics sent to investigators on 
February 13, 2019 (“Re: Safety Communication: Potential Risk of Drug-Drug Interaction”). This 
letter was to inform the investigators about potential drug-drug interaction between tucatinib and 
sensitive CYP3A4 substrates (such as palbociclib) based on the results of drug-drug interaction 
study ONT-380-012. This study demonstrated that in healthy volunteers tucatinib increased the 
geometric mean of midazolam exposure (AUC) 5.85-fold (90% CI 5.14 – 6.66); therefore, 
tucatinib belongs to the class of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. According to the FDA prescribing 
information, the dose of palbociclib, which is a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, needs to be decreased 
to 75mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off when palbociclib is used with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. 
These findings were discussed with both Pfizer and Seattle Genetics, decision was made to change 
the dose of palbociclib to 75mg daily for all patients who were on study, and for all newly enrolled 
patients (as discussed in the Letter to the Investigators from the lead study PI Dr. Shagisultanova 
dated February 15 2019). Therefore, starting from February 15, 2019, all new patients are enrolled 
in phase II part of the study at the following drug doses: tucatinib 300 mg PO BID; palbociclib 75 
mg PO daily 21 days on followed by 7 days off; and letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily. For all patients 
who were on study prior to February 15 2019, the dose of palbociclib was changed to 75mg PO 
daily 21 days on followed by 7 days off (regardless of clinical toxicities), while the doses of 
tucatinib and letrozole were not changed. Additional PK analysis for palbociclib and tucatinib was 
planned in patients enrolled in phase II part of the study, to assure safety of the participants.   
 
Dose modifications of the study drugs  
 
Tucatinib will be administered at 300 mg PO BID, which is the current MTD/RP2D when given 
in combination with trastuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, or capecitabine. Any grade 3 
toxicity related to tucatinib (this excludes bone marrow suppression, hot flashes or other adverse 
events felt to be clearly related to palbociclib or letrozole) will result in the drug being held until 
the toxicity returns to grade ≤1. Tucatinib related toxicity must resolve to grade ≤1 within 3 weeks 
for the subject to remain on study. Then, the subject may resume therapy at 250 mg PO BID. A 
second and third dose hold for toxicity may occur with the same timeline of 3 weeks for symptom 
recovery to grade ≤1, then drug may be resumed at 200 mg and 150 mg BID, respectively. If a 
fourth episode of grade 3 tucatinib-related toxicity occurs, drug should be held and subject 
removed from study. Once the dose of tucatinib is de-escalated for an individual subject, it will 
not be increased for that subject during later cycles. At any time if grade 3 toxicity is not resolved 
to grade ≤1 within 3 weeks, subject will be removed from study. See the full protocol for dose 
holding and instructions related to cardiac toxicity and liver function abnormalities.  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 13 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
Table 4. Tucatinib dose modifications 
 
Dose Modification for AEs  
Dose  
Recommended starting dose  
300mg PO BID  
First dose reduction  
250 mg PO BID  
Second dose reduction  
200 mg PO BID  
Third dose reduction 
150mg PO BID 
 
Prior to availability of new safety information on tucatinib – palbociclib interaction (prior to 
February 15, 2019) the following dosing was used for palbociclib:  
Palbociclib will be initiated at the FDA approved dose of 125 mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off. 
Dose interruption for known adverse effects, including grade 3-4 bone marrow suppression, should 
occur per standard therapy (palbociclib full prescribing information brochure) [28]. Palbociclib 
should be held for any subject who experiences a grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities clearly 
related to palbociclib, grade 3 neutropenia with fever, or grade 4 neutropenia, and resumed when 
symptoms improved to grade ≤2 at the next dose level. Palbociclib should be discontinued if no 
improvement of symptoms is seen within 3 weeks. Up to two dose reductions of palbociclib are 
allowed (100 mg, and 75 mg PO daily). Palbociclib dose should not be re-escalated for a subject 
after a dose reduction is made.  
 
After the information became available to the investigators about potential tucatinib – palbociclib 
interaction (after February 15, 2019), the following dosing is being used for palbociclib: 
Palbociclib will be initiated at the FDA approved dose of 75mg daily 21 days on, 7 days off (FDA 
approved dose in combination with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors). Dose interruption for known 
adverse effects, including grade 3-4 bone marrow suppression, should occur per standard therapy 
(palbociclib full prescribing information brochure) [28]. Palbociclib should be held for any subject 
who experiences a grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities clearly related to palbociclib, grade 3 
neutropenia with fever, or grade 4 neutropenia, and resumed when symptoms improved to grade 
≤2 at the next dose level. Palbociclib should be discontinued if no improvement of symptoms is 
seen within 3 weeks. 
 
Letrozole will be administered at fixed dose 2.5mg PO daily with no dose adjustments. 
Premenopausal women enrolled in the study will be required to receive ovarian function 
suppression (goserelin 3.8 mg subcutaneously every 28 days is the recommended method; 
however, any standard drug and drug frequency for ovarian function suppression is allowed per 
discretion of treating physician with Lead PI approval). Letrozole may be held for grade 3 toxicity 
clearly or potentially attributable to this drug, as determined by the treating physician. Study team 
should be notified and clear record of the AE according to NCI-CTCAE criteria recorded as for 
the other two drugs in the combination.  When symptoms resolve to ≤ grade 2, the subject may 
resume letrozole. If symptoms do not resolve to grade ≤2 within 3 weeks, or if the second episode 
of grade 3 toxicity occurs, letrozole should be discontinued. 
 
Subjects are allowed to stay on the study if either palbociclib or letrozole are discontinued. If both 
palbociclib and letrozole are stopped for toxicity, subjects will be removed from the study. If 
tucatinib is discontinued for toxicity, subjects will be removed from the study.  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 14 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
Study Assessments 
Baseline Assessments 
There will be a screening period of up to 28 days after subjects sign informed consent. During that 
time, all subjects will undergo standard radiologic imaging for complete assessment of disease to 
include chest, abdomen and pelvis, as well as bone assessment and appropriate imaging of any 
other known sites of disease. Recommended imaging includes a diagnostic quality CT scan and 
bone scan. Brain MRI is not required for neurologically asymptomatic subjects without known 
brain metastases. Baseline brain MRI is required in subjects with neurological symptoms and/or 
known brain metastases (CT of the brain will not be allowed, and subjects with known 
contraindications to undergoing MRI imaging will be excluded from the study). Blood samples for 
hematology, coagulation, chemistry, and liver function tests will be drawn. All laboratory 
assessments will be performed using local clinical laboratories. EKG will also be performed, along 
with assessment of cardiac ejection fraction by MUGA or ECHO. Pregnancy testing (except in 
women of non-childbearing potential) will be performed within 7 days of the first study treatment. 
Subjects will have a pre-treatment blood samples drawn to assess for biomarkers of response.  
Subjects will be asked to undergo optional but highly encouraged tumor core needle biopsy. 
 
Safety Assessments 
Subjects will be assessed throughout the study for safety, including physical exam and collection 
of AEs and laboratory abnormalities performed at a minimum of once every four weeks throughout 
study treatment and within 30 days after the last dose of study drugs. All laboratory assessments 
will be performed locally at sites. During cycles 1 and 2, complete blood count and differential 
will be checked on Day 15 for standard palbociclib monitoring. Assessment of cardiac ejection 
fraction will be performed by MUGA or ECHO at screening and once every 12 weeks thereafter 
until study discontinuation, irrespective of dose delays or interruption. 
 
There will be 2 pre-planned interim safety analyses of data obtained from subjects enrolled in phase 
Ib part of the study prior to proceeding with phase II part. These will occur after 10 subjects are 
enrolled and have met the safety evaluable time point (completed at least 28 days of treatment) 
and then after 20 subjects are enrolled and met the safety evaluable time point. The proportion of 
subjects experiencing DLTs clearly related to tucatinib 
and/or palbociclib will be determined. 
Planned starting dose modifications based on these safety assessments are outlined above in 
“Safety analysis of the combination therapy”. The study will be continued to phase II at the 
planned starting doses or at one of the dose modification levels outlined above if the overall 
rate of DLTs is ≤60% for palbociclib, ≤20% for tucatinib and ≤ 50% for toxicities potentially 
attributable to both drugs, and PK analysis is not suggestive of significant changes to the 
metabolism of the study drugs at a selected dose level. If additional data become available that 
may affect safety of the participants, doses of the study drugs may be modified accordingly.  
 
Efficacy Assessments 
Efficacy assessments will consist of evaluation of all known sites of metastatic or locally advanced 
unresectable disease. Subjects will undergo standard radiologic imaging for complete assessment 
of disease to include chest, abdomen and pelvis, as well as bone assessment and appropriate 
imaging of any other known sites of disease. Recommended imaging includes a diagnostic quality 
CT scan and bone scan. In addition, all subjects with known brain metastatic disease should have 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 15 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
restaging contrast enhanced MRI of the brain. Imaging studies will be repeated every 8 weeks for 
the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks thereafter, irrespective of dose holdings or 
interruptions.  
 
Pharmacokinetic Assessments 
PK assessments of blood levels of tucatinib and palbociclib will be performed on Cycle 1 Day 15 
and Cycle 2 Day 1 of therapy in 20 participants enrolled in phase Ib part of the study. Plasma 
samples will be collected to measure levels of tucatinib and its hydroxyl metabolite, as well as 
levels of palbociclib and, if needed, its metabolites at steady state on Cycle 1 Day 15. Plasma 
samples will also be collected prior to administration of tucatinib and palbociclib on the first day 
of Cycles 2 to assess trough levels. 
 
Additional PK assessment will be done in 5 to 10 patients enrolled in phase II part of the study to 
evaluate the levels of tucatinib and palbociclib. These PKs will be done on Cycle 1 Day 9 and 
Cycle 2 Day 9. Prior to the first set of PKs, on Cycle 1 Days 1-8, patient will take palbociclib and 
letrozole; tucatinib will be on hold. Tucatinib will be started per usual study schedule after the first 
set of PKs is obtained on Day 9. Prior to the second set of PKs, on Cycle 2 Days 1-8, patient will 
take palbociclib, letrozole and tucatinib (all study drugs) per usual study schedule. On the day prior 
to PK evaluation (Day 8 of Cycle 1 and Day 8 of Cycle 2), patient should consume high calorie / 
high fat meal at 8:00PM and take study drugs at 10:00PM. On the next day, plasma samples will 
be collected to measure PKs at 10, 13, 16 and 19 hrs +/- 10 minutes post dose (8:00AM, 11:00AM, 
2:00PM and 5:00PM on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 2 Day 9). For detailed information on phase II 
PKs, refer to the LabConnect Manual (PK collection manual) provided by Seattle Genetics, Inc.  
 
Table 5. Schedule of pharmacokinetic assessments 
 
Cycle  
Day  
Time point 
Phase Ib PK assessment 
1 
15 
0 h (pre-dose) prior to dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
0.5 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
1 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
2 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
3 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
4 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
6 h (±30 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
2 
1 
0 h (pre-dose) prior to dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
Phase II PK assessment (late PK time points) 
1 
1-8 
Patient takes palbociclib 75mg and letrozole 2.5mg PO every evening 
(tucatinib is on hold). On day 8, patient consumes high fat / high calorie 
meal at 8:00PM and take palbociclib at 10:00PM (leterozole at any time). 
Patient records timing of study drugs in the diary. 
1 
9 
10 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (8AM) 
 
 
13 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (11AM) 
 
 
16 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (2PM) 
 
 
19 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (5PM) 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 16 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
1 
9-28 
Post-PKs, patient starts tucatinib, continues on palbociclib and letrozole 
per study schedule 
2 
1-8 
Patient takes palbociclib, tucatinib and letrozole per study schedule. On 
day 8, patient consumes high fat / high calorie meal at 8:00PM and take 
palbociclib and the evening dose of tucatinib at 10:00PM (leterozole at any 
time). Patient records timing of study drugs in the diary 
2 
9 
10 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (8AM)* 
 
 
13 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (11AM) 
 
 
16 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (2PM) 
 
 
19 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (5PM) 
*About 10:00AM patient will be due for the next morning dose of tucatinib, and should take it 
approximately at this time 
 
Collections of Samples for Assessments of Biomarkers of Response 
Subjects will have research blood samples drawn pre-treatment, after 28 days of treatment (±3 
days), and after completion of all study treatments at the end of the study. These samples will be 
obtained for ctDNA analysis, and analysis of other circulating markers associated with cancer 
prognosis or treatment outcomes. Subjects will be asked to undergo tumor core needle biopsies 
pre-treatment and at any time during cycle 2. These paired tumor biopsies are optional, but highly 
encouraged. There will be also optional third biopsy at the time of progression or study withdrawal 
for other reasons. For detailed information on blood and tissue collection and shipment, please refer 
to the collection, processing and shipping instructions outlined in the Study Lab Manual. Residual 
blood and tumor samples left after analysis may be placed in the study biorepository if study subject 
provides voluntary consent for future research. 
 
End-of-Study Assessments 
 
A final safety assessment including physical examination and laboratory assessments will be 
required at the time when subjects come off the study, as well as in 30 (±3) days after 
discontinuation of all study treatments. Subjects will have a research blood sample drawn to assess 
for the presence of potential biomarkers of response or resistance at the time when they come off 
the study. Subjects who had progressive disease on therapy will be asked to get an optional tumor 
biopsy to assess changes in the tumor that determined progression on therapy. 
 
Subject population:  
• 20 subjects with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HR+/HER2+ breast cancer in 
the phase Ib part of the study.  
• 20 subjects with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HR+/HER2+ positive breast 
cancer in the phase II part of the study 
 
Study timeline: 
• Phase Ib part accrual – 6 month 
• Phase II part accrual – 6 month 
• Total projected accrual time – 1 year 
• Phase Ib primary end-point reporting – 8 month 
• Phase II primary end-point reporting – 2.5 years 
• Anticipated completion of the study – 2.5 years 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 17 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
This multicenter clinical trial will be conducted through the Academic Breast Cancer Consortium 
(ABRCC), with the University of Colorado Cancer Center as the lead site. A Protocol Contact 
Form will be maintained for the study and include a listing of all participating sites and key 
personnel. 
 
Inclusion criteria: 
1. Subjects must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of HR+/HER2+ locally advanced 
unresectable or metastatic breast cancer. Estrogen or progesterone receptor positivity is defined 
by IHC according to the most recent ASCO/CAP guidelines [29]. HER2 positivity is defined 
by standard of care fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or 3+ staining by IHC 
according to the most recent ASCO/CAP guidelines [30].  
2. Measurable and/or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1 criteria and/or RANO-BM criteria 
(Appendix C). Bone only disease is allowed.  
3. CNS inclusion criteria:  
• Subjects without CNS metastases are eligible. Note: brain imaging is not required for 
asymptomatic subjects without known brain metastatic disease prior to enrollment into the 
study 
• Subjects with untreated asymptomatic CNS metastases not needing immediate local 
therapy in the opinion of investigator are eligible. For subjects with untreated 
asymptomatic CNS lesions > 2.0 cm by contrast-enhanced MRI, discussion with and 
approval from the Lead PI is required prior to enrollment 
• Subjects with stable brain metastases previously treated with radiation therapy or surgery 
are allowed to enroll, provided that they are off corticosteroids or on stable/tapering dose 
of corticosteroids and stability of CNS metastatic disease for at least 4 weeks has been 
demonstrated, with the last MRI taken within 2 weeks prior to cycle 1 day 1 of the study. 
Relevant records of any CNS treatment must be available to allow for classification of 
target and non-target lesions 
4. Age ≥ 18 years 
5. ECOG performance status 0-1 
6. Life expectancy of more than 6 months, in the opinion of the investigator 
7. Study subjects should be post-menopausal women; premenopausal women are eligible if on 
ovarian suppression, or agreeable to mandatory ovarian suppression. Women of childbearing 
potential, defined as premenopausal women who are not permanently sterile (i.e., due to 
hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral tubal occlusion) are 
required to have negative pregnancy tests prior to initiation of treatment.  
8. Prior treatments:  
• Subjects should have received at least two approved HER2-targeted agents (trastuzumab, 
pertuzumab, or TDM-1) in the course of their disease 
• Subjects should have had at least 1 line of prior HER2-targeted therapy in the metastatic 
setting, with the exception of asymptomatic subjects with oligometastatic or bone / soft 
tissue only disease who, on investigator opinion, are appropriate for a single agent anti-
endocrine therapy per NCCN guidelines 
• Subjects who have had up to 2 lines of prior endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting are 
allowed. Prior adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant endocrine regimens are allowed and not 
counted towards this limit  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 18 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
9. Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below: 
• Absolute neutrophil count  ≥ 1,500/mm3  
• Platelets ≥ 75,000/mm3  
• Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 mg/dL without red blood cell transfusion ≤ 7 days prior to Cycle 1 
Day 1 of therapy 
• Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN) except for subjects with known 
Gilbert’s disease, who may enroll if the conjugated bilirubin is ≤ 1.5 ULN 
• AST (SGOT)/ALT (SGPT) ≤2.5 X ULN;  
• Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL 
• International normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≤ 
1.5 X ULN unless on medication known to alter INR and aPTT 
• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% (as assessed by ECHO or MUGA) 
documented within 4 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment 
• Serum or urine pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential) negative ≤ 7 days 
of starting treatment  
10. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent and comply 
with the study scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests and other procedures. 
11. Subject or legally authorized representative of a subject must provide signed informed consent 
per a consent document that has been approved by an institutional review board or independent 
ethics committee (IRB/IEC) prior to initiation of any study-related tests or procedures that are 
not part of standard-of-care for the subject’s disease. 
 
Exclusion criteria: 
1. Subjects with previously treated progressing brain metastases are excluded from the study 
2. Subjects with known brain metastases and contraindications to undergo contrast MRI imaging 
of the brain are excluded from the study 
3. Pregnancy or breast feeding 
4. Current active treatment with an investigational agent 
5. Known history of hypersensitivity to aromatase-inhibitor drugs  
6. Any toxicity related to prior cancer therapies that has not resolved to ≤ Grade 1, with the 
exception of peripheral neuropathy, which must have resolved to ≤ Grade 2, and alopecia 
7. Previous treatment with lapatinib, neratinib, afatinib, or other investigational EGFR-family 
receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor or HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor 
8. Previous treatment with palbociclib, abemaciclib, ribociclib or other investigational CDK4/6 
inhibitors 
9. Any systemic anti-cancer therapy (including hormonal therapy), radiation, or experimental 
agent ≤ 2 weeks of first dose of study treatment 
10. Active bacterial, fungal or viral infections requiring treatment with IV antibiotic, IV anti-
fungal, or IV anti-viral drugs 
11. Known hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 
infections. Note: pretesting is not required. 
12. Inability to swallow pills or any significant gastrointestinal disease which would preclude the 
adequate oral absorption of medications  
13. Use of prohibited medications listed in Appendix D within 3 elimination half-lives prior to 
first dose of the study treatment 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 19 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
14. Known myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, percutaneous transluminal coronary 
angioplasty/stenting (PTCA), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) within 6 month of the 
first dose of the study treatment 
15. Clinically significant cardio-vascular disease, such as ventricular arrhythmia requiring therapy, 
uncontrolled hypertension (defined as persistent systolic blood pressure > 160 mm Hg and/or 
diastolic blood pressure > 100 mm Hg on antihypertensive medications), or any history of 
symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF) 
16. Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric conditions or laboratory abnormalities 
that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or 
may interfere with the interpretation of study results, or in the judgment of the investigator 
would make the subject inappropriate for entry into the study. 
 
Statistical considerations  
 
This is a multicenter, open-label, single arm study to determine safety and efficacy of the tucatinib 
in combination with palbociclib and letrozole in subjects with HR+/HER2+ locally advanced 
unresectable or metastatic breast cancer.  
 
The primary endpoint of the phase Ib part of this trial is safety and tolerability of combination 
therapy as evaluated by standard NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Interim safety analysis will be 
performed after 10 subjects are accrued to the Phase Ib and again after 20 subjects are accrued to 
the phase Ib prior to the initiation of phase II part. At these time, we will assess the proportion of 
subjects that experienced DLTs related to toxicity of tucatinib and/or palbociclib as outlined in 
“Safety analysis of the combination therapy” and below.  
 
Incidence, nature and severity of all adverse events (AEs) that occur on therapy will be analyzed. 
Safety will be considered clinically meaningfully altered if 60% or greater proportion of subjects 
experience DLTs secondary to the toxicity of palbociclib, or 20% or greater proportion of subjects 
experience DLTs secondary to the toxicity of tucatinib, or 50% or greater proportion of subjects 
experience DLTs potentially attributable to both drugs (Table 6).  
 
Table 6. Baseline toxicity rates and safety boundaries for palbociclib and tucatinib  
 
Drug 
Confidence 
level 
N* 
Baseline 
toxicity rate 
Safety 
boundary rate 
Upper limit 
CI 
n** 
palbociclib 
0.9 
10 
0.45 
0.6 
0.812 
8 out of 10 
20 
0.45 
0.6 
0.751 
15 out of 20 
tucatinib 
0.9 
10 
0.10 
0.2 
0.408 
4 out of 10 
20 
0.10 
0.2 
0.347 
7 out of 20 
both drugs 
0.9 
10 
ND*** 
0.5 
0.760 
8 out of 10 
20 
ND 
0.5 
0.694 
14 out of 20 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 20 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
*N – total number of subjects; **n – number of subjects experiencing DLTs that is set as safety 
boundary; ***ND – not determined 
 
To determine the safety of the triple combination, we plan to enroll 10 subjects at the baseline 
starting doses of tucatinib 300mg PO BID, palbociclib 125mg PO daily 21 days on and 7 days off, 
and letrozole 2.5mg PO daily on a 28 day cycle length (DL1). 
 
After 10 subjects are accrued to the study and complete at least 1 cycle of treatment, we will 
perform an interim analysis of the safety Phase Ib cohort. If there are 7 or fewer subjects had DLTs 
attributable to palbociclib, 3 or fewer subjects had DLTs attributable to tucatinib, and 7 or fewer 
subjects had DLTs potentially attributable to both drugs, then the interim safety of the Phase Ib 
cohort will be considered acceptable and accrual will continue to enroll to 20 subjects without 
change of the starting doses. Otherwise, we will de-escalate to the next dose levels. 
 
Scenario 1: Palbociclib toxicity increased 
If 8 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects had DLTs attributable to palbociclib, we will de-
escalate therapy to DL -1.  
 
Scenario 2: Tucatinib toxicity increased 
If 4 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects had DLTs attributable to tucatinib, we will de-
escalate therapy to DL -2.  
 
Scenario 3: Unclear or combined attributable toxicity: 
If there is a lack of clarity or a combination of toxicities in 8 out of 10 or greater proportion of 
subjects (DLTs attributable to both tucatinib and palbociclib), doses tucatinib and palbociclib will 
be de-escalated to DL -3.  
 
Two additional pre-planned dose levels (DL -4 and DL -5) are designed to incorporate the 
possibility of PK analysis indicating potentially significant changes in the metabolism of tucatinib 
(regardless of clinical symptoms and DLTs that subjects may or may not experience). Based on 
the information available prior to phase Ib part of the study, changes in metabolism of palbociclib 
were not anticipated.  
 
If accrual to subjects 11-20 of the phase Ib cohort demonstrates a level of DLTs equal or above 
the threshold of 15/20 subjects for palbociclib attributable events, 7/20 subjects with tucatinib 
attributable events, or 14/20 subjects where toxicities are potentially attributable to both drugs 
(Table 6), or if PK analysis for subjects 11-20 is suggestive of clinically significant drug 
interaction, then consideration of additional drug specific dose reductions will occur. This event 
will need an additional consideration of further dose reductions requiring potential protocol 
amendment. It could potentially trigger enrollment of additional 10 subjects in the phase Ib safety 
cohort, or stopping clinical trial for the safety reasons, which will be determined, if this unlikely 
event should occur, by the Lead PI with the input from the study research team, the sponsor, Pfizer 
Inc., Seattle Genetics, Inc., and/or the protocol Data Safety Monitoring Committee.  
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 21 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Letrozole dose will be kept constant for all study subjects. Subjects may choose to discontinue 
letrozole secondary to known aromatase-inhibitor dependent AEs, which we expect will occur at 
a frequency of 4-6% [20].  However, because these toxicities are not life-threatening, we will not 
hinge the study safety assessments on letrozole toxicities.  
 
The primary efficacy endpoint for the phase II part is PFS defined as the time from allocation to 
the first documented disease progression (according to RECIST 1.1 and/or RANO-BM criteria) or 
death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If a subject does not have a documented date of 
progression or death, PFS will be censored at the date of the last adequate assessment. For PFS, 
Kaplan-Meier quartile estimates along with the 95% CI will be provided.  
 
Phase II study is designed to detect a 50% improvement in PFS from the triple combination of 
tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole comparing to historical control. Given significant proportion 
of heavily pretreated patients with visceral metastases and CNS disease enrolled in clinical trial of 
tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole, appropriate historical control should include similar patients. 
Table 7 below summarizes prior clinical trials of HER2 targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer.  
Considering characteristics of the patients enrolled in these studies, TH3resa trial of TDM-1 versus 
physician choice therapy in metastatic HER2+ breast cancer is the most appropriate choice for 
historical control. TH3resa included patients who received ≥2 HER2-targeted agents for metastatic 
breast cancer, patients with visceral disease, and patients with CNS disease (although patients with 
untreated and / or symptomatic CNS disease were excluded). TH3resa demonstrated PSF of 6.2 
months in the TDM-1 treatment group. Therefore, considering 50% improvement of PFS 
comparing to historical control, target PFS for tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole clinical trial is 
9.3 months.  
 
Table 7. Clinical trials of HER2 targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer 
 
Clinical trial 
Year of 
reporting 
Prior therapy 
Patient 
characteristics 
PFS 
(months) 
PERTAIN 
trastuzumab, 
pertuzumab, letrozole ± 
induction 
chemotherapy [31] 
2017 
Front line, no prior 
therapy for MBC*. 
Induction chemotherapy 
was given at the 
discretion of treating MD 
Excluded CNS 
disease 
18 
Lapatinib and letrozole 
[13] 
2009 
Front line, no prior 
therapy for MBC 
Excluded 
symptomatic 
visceral disease 
and CNS disease 
8 
Lapatinib and 
capecitabine [32] 
2013 
Up to 2 prior trastuzumab 
containing regimens 
Excluded 
untreated CNS 
disease 
6.8 
TH3resa (TDM-1) [33, 
34] 
2014, 2017 
Prior trastuzumab, 
lapatinib, and taxane; ≥2 
HER2-targeted agents for 
MBC 
Excluded 
untreated and / or 
symptomatic 
CNS disease 
6.2 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 22 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Neratinib and 
capecitabine [35] 
2017 
No prior lapatinib or 
capecitabine 
Only patients 
with CNS disease 
were enrolled 
5.5 
KAMILLA CNS 
cohort (TDM-1) [36] 
2016 
Prior treatment with 
trastuzumab and taxane 
Only patients 
with CNS disease 
were enrolled in 
the CNS cohort 
5.5 
*MBC – metastatic breast cancer 
 
Using the survival analysis and assuming that the survival time is exponentially distributed, accrual 
time is 12 months, follow up time is 18 months, and drop out / loss of follow up rate is 5%, the 
sample size of 40 patients total (20 patients enrolled in phase Ib part, and 20 patients enrolled in 
phase II part) will allow us to achieve a statistical power of 82% with a one-sided type I error rate 
of 0.1 to detect 50% improvement in median PFS (from 6.2 month in the historical control to 9.3 
months in the current study). 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 23 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Table 8. Study calendar 
Measurement/Treatment 
Screening 
Treatment Day 
(Cycle 1) a 
Treatment Day (Subsequent Cycles) a 
At completion of the 
study 
Days 
–28 to –1 
Day 1 
Day 9 
Day 15 
Cycle 2 
Day 1 
Cycle 2 
Day 9 
Cycle 2 
Day 15 
Cycle 3 
Day 1 
Cycle 4+ 
Day 1 
End of 
treatment l 
30-day post-
treatment m 
Informed Consent and HIPAA Authorization 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inclusion/Exclusion 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical/Cancer History including ER, PR, 
HER2 status, tumor grade, stage, and prior 
therapy/dates/response 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Physical Examination  
X 
Xc 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Vital Signs (HR, temp, BP, HT,WT) b 
Xb 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
ECOG Performance Status  
X 
Xc 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
CBC and differential 
X 
Xc 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
CMP 
X 
Xc 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
PT/INR, PTT 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pregnancy Test d 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole treatment 
 
--Xe-- 
 
--X-- 
--X-- 
 
--X-- 
--X-- 
--X-- 
 
 
Electrocardiogram (locally read) 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plasma Sample Pharmacokinetics phase I f 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plasma Sample Pharmacokinetics phase II g 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Radiographic Tumor Evaluation h 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Xh 
 
X 
 
ECHO or MUGA i 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Xi 
 
 
Tissue block j 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Optional tumor biopsy 
X 
 
 
 
Xn 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Research blood sample 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
AE Monitoring k 
 
--X-- 
 
--X-- 
--X-- 
 
--X-- 
--X-- 
--X-- 
--X-- 
--X-- 
Concomitant Medications k 
X 
--X-- 
 
--X-- 
--X-- 
 
--X-- 
--X-- 
--X-- 
--X-- 
--X-- 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova    COMIRB# 16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date: 3.23.2020 
Page 24 of 115 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AE – adverse event; ER – estrogen receptor; BP – blood pressure; HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HIPAA – Health Insurance 
Portability and Accountability Act; HR – heart rate; HT – height; INR – international normalized ratio; RR – respiratory rate; PR – progesterone receptor; 
PT – prothrombin time; PTT – partial thromboplastin time; CBC – complete blood count; CMP – Complete metabolic profile; WT – weight 
 
Bolded in red color and underlined - non-standard of care interventions 
a. 
Each visit following Day 1 must be completed with ±2 days of the indicated visit day 
b.  
Height needed only at baseline, and not at subsequent assessments 
c. 
Repeated only if more than 72 hours since screening assessments.  Assessments must continue to be acceptable if repeated. 
d. 
Women of childbearing potential only, within 7 days prior to the start of treatment. 
e.  
Tucatinib should be held on cycle 1 day 1-8 in patients for whom PKs will be obtained on cycle 1 day 9 (phase II part of the study) 
f. 
PKs for palbociclib and tucatinib will be obtained in 20 subjects enrolled in phase Ib part of the study. PK schedule: PKs on   cycle 1 
day 15 prior to dosing tucatinib and palbociclib, and in 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hrs after the dose; PKs on cycle 2 day 1 prior to dosing of 
tucatinib and palbociclib. 
g.          PKs for palbociclib and tucatinib will be obtained in 5-10 subjects enrolled in phase II part of the study. These patients should hold 
tucatinib during cycle 1 days 1-8 (prior to cycle 1 PKs), and resume tucatinib per protocol on cycle 1 day 9, after PKs are obtained. 
Patients should take all study drugs per protocol during cycle 2 days 1-8. On day 8 of cycle 1 and cycle 2 (a day prior to PK 
analysis) a patient should consume high calorie / high protein meal at 8:00PM and take study drugs at 10:00PM. On day 9 of cycle 1 
and cycle 2, PKs will be obtained at 10, 13, 16, and 19 hrs after the drug dose (at 8AM, 11AM, 2PM and 5PM). 
h. 
Imaging studies must be done within 28 days prior to entering study and may include CT C/A/P, NM bone scan, and appropriate 
imaging to assess any other known site of disease. Subjects with known CNS disease should get contrast-enhanced MRIs of the 
brain. Intervals of scans will be every 2 months for the first 6 cycles (at day 26 ± 3 days on cycles 2, 4, and 6), and then every 3 
months for all subsequent cycles (at day 26 ± 3 days on cycles 9, 12, 15, etc.). If cycles are delayed for any reason, then perform 
radiographic assessment of metastatic disease in 8 weeks (±3 days) from the previous scan for the first 24 weeks of the study, and in 
12 weeks (±3days) afterwards. 
i. 
ECHO/MUGA testing be done at baseline, and repeated every 12 weeks after cycle 1 day 1 of the study (on day 26 ± 3 days of cycle 
3, 6, 9, 12 and etc.). Whichever testing modality is chosen in screening should be used for all subsequent cardiac assessments 
throughout the study for comparison. If cycles are delayed for any reason or there is an interim assessment, then perform assessment 
in 12 weeks (±3 days) from previous ECHO or MUGA. 
j.         Collection of primary breast tumor and metastatic tumor archival tissue block or slides will be initiated after enrollment (please refer 
to the Study Lab Manual for details). 
k. 
AEs and concomitant medications are monitored continually while on study. Subjects are instructed to call with AE symptoms and 
change in concomitant medications between scheduled visits 
l. 
End of treatment visit shall occur at the time or within 7 days after the subject discontinues treatment with study drug. 
m. 
30-day post-treatment safety visit shall occur in 30±3 days after the subject discontinued treatment with study drug. 
n. 
Optional tumor biopsy can be performed at any time during cycle 2.  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 25 of 115 
 
Contents 
1 
CONCEPT AND RATIONALE...........................................................................................30 
1.1 
Hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer .............................................30 
1.2 
HR expression confers resistance to HER2-targeted therapies ............................................30 
1.3 
HER2 overexpression is associated with resistance to anti-hormonal therapy........................30 
1.4 
Combining anti-hormonal and HER2-targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer ..................31 
1.5 
CDK4/6 inhibitors synergize with anti-hormonal and HER2-targeted agents ........................32 
1.6 
Novel HER2-targeted small molecule inhibitor tucatinib synergizes with palbociclib and 
fulvestrant in tumor cell lines ..................................................................................................32 
1.7 
Rationale for combining HER2-targeted agents with anti-hormonal agents and CDK4/6 
inhibitors in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer ....................................................................................33 
2 
STUDY DRUGS ...............................................................................................................34 
2.1 
Tucatinib ...................................................................................................................34 
2.1.1 
Mechanism of action ............................................................................................34 
2.1.2 
In vitro biochemistry and cell biology .....................................................................34 
2.1.3 
In vivo pharmacology ...........................................................................................35 
2.1.4 
Non-clinical safety ...............................................................................................35 
2.1.5 
Pharmacokinetics, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion ..........................36 
2.1.6 
Summary of clinical studies ...................................................................................36 
2.1.7 
Clinical study ARRAY-380-101.............................................................................40 
2.1.8 
Clinical study ONT-380-004..................................................................................41 
2.1.9 
Clinical study ONT-380-005..................................................................................42 
2.1.10 
Clinical pharmacokinetic results .............................................................................43 
2.1.11 
ONT-380 / tucatinib in the treatment of CNS metastases ............................................44 
2.2 
Palbociclib .................................................................................................................44 
2.2.1 
Mechanism of action ............................................................................................44 
2.2.2 
Pharmacokinetics: absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion ..........................45 
2.2.3 
Summary of clinical studies ...................................................................................46 
2.3 
Letrozole ...................................................................................................................47 
3 
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS.......................................................................................48 
3.1 
Phase Ib part ..............................................................................................................48 
3.1.1 
Primary objective .................................................................................................48 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 26 of 115 
 
3.1.2 
Secondary objectives ............................................................................................48 
3.1.3 
Primary endpoint .................................................................................................48 
3.1.4 
Secondary endpoints.............................................................................................48 
3.2 
Phase II part ...............................................................................................................48 
3.2.1 
Primary objective .................................................................................................48 
3.2.2 
Secondary objectives ............................................................................................49 
3.2.3 
Primary endpoint .................................................................................................49 
3.2.4 
Secondary endpoints.............................................................................................49 
3.3 
Scientific endpoints / correlative studies for phase IB and phase II parts ..............................49 
4 
STUDY DESIGN ..............................................................................................................49 
4.1 
Overview ...................................................................................................................49 
4.2 
Safety analysis of the combination therapy......................................................................51 
4.2.1 
Dose limiting toxicities .........................................................................................51 
4.2.2 
Safety analysis algorithm ......................................................................................52 
4.3 
Efficacy analysis of the combination therapy ...................................................................55 
4.4 
Number of subjects .....................................................................................................56 
4.5 
Study timeline ............................................................................................................56 
5 
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ..................................................................................................56 
5.1 
Inclusion criteria .........................................................................................................56 
5.2 
Exclusion criteria ........................................................................................................58 
6 
STUDY TREATMENTS ....................................................................................................58 
6.1 
Drug Supply...............................................................................................................58 
6.1.1 
Tucatinib formulation, packaging and storage...........................................................58 
6.1.2 
Palbociclib formulation, packaging and storage ........................................................59 
6.1.3 
Letrozole formulation, packaging and storage...........................................................59 
6.1.4 
Drug accountability ..............................................................................................59 
6.1.5 
Administration.....................................................................................................60 
6.1.6 
Compliance .........................................................................................................60 
6.2 
Attribution of toxicities ................................................................................................60 
6.3 
Dose modifications of the study drugs ............................................................................64 
6.3.1 
Dose modification of tucatinib ...............................................................................64 
6.3.2 
Dose modifications of palbociclib...........................................................................65 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 27 of 115 
 
6.3.3 
Dose modifications of tucatinib and palbociclib for toxicities potentially attributable to 
both drugs.........................................................................................................................67 
6.3.4 
Discontinuation of letrozole ...................................................................................68 
6.4 
Concomitant medications .............................................................................................69 
6.4.1 
Potential drug interactions .....................................................................................69 
6.4.2 
Allowed concomitant therapy.................................................................................70 
6.4.3 
Prohibited concomitant therapy ..............................................................................71 
7 
STUDY PROCEDURES ....................................................................................................71 
7.1 
Baseline.....................................................................................................................71 
7.2 
Trial Period ................................................................................................................72 
7.2.1 
Cycle 1 Day 1......................................................................................................72 
7.2.2 
Cycle 1 Day 8......................................................................................................73 
7.2.3 
Cycle 1 Day 9......................................................................................................73 
7.2.4 
Cycle 1 Day 15 (±2 days) ......................................................................................73 
7.2.5 
Cycle 2 Day 1 and Day 1 of all subsequent cycles (±2 days) .......................................73 
7.2.6 
Cycle 2 Day 8......................................................................................................74 
7.2.7 
Cycle 2 Day 9......................................................................................................74 
7.2.8 
Cycle 2 Day 15 (±2 days) ......................................................................................74 
7.2.9 
Cycle 2, 4, and 6, day 26 (±3 days) .........................................................................74 
7.2.10 
Cycle 3 day 26, and thereafter every third cycle (±3 days) ..........................................74 
7.2.11 
Cycle 9 day 26, and thereafter every third cycle (±3 days) ..........................................74 
7.3 
End of treatment visit ..................................................................................................75 
7.4 
Thirty days post-treatment follow-up (±3 days)................................................................75 
7.5 
Subject withdrawal......................................................................................................75 
8 
ASSESSMENTS ...............................................................................................................76 
8.1 
Safety evaluations .......................................................................................................76 
8.1.1 
Laboratory assessments.........................................................................................76 
8.1.2 
EKG assessments .................................................................................................77 
8.1.3 
Safety plan for cardiotoxicity .................................................................................77 
8.1.4 
Safety plan for hepatotoxicity ................................................................................77 
8.1.5 
Safety plan for neutropenia and infection risk ...........................................................78 
8.1.6 
Safety plan for subjects with CNS metastases ...........................................................79 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 28 of 115 
 
8.1.7 
Safety plan for prevention of pregnancy ..................................................................79 
8.2 
Efficacy evaluations ....................................................................................................79 
8.3 
Pharmacokinetic evaluations .........................................................................................80 
8.4 
Collection of patient material for correlative studies .........................................................81 
8.5 
Concomitant medications .............................................................................................82 
9 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING .......................................................................................82 
9.1 
Adverse events ...........................................................................................................82 
9.2 
Reporting period .........................................................................................................82 
9.3 
Definition of an Adverse Event .....................................................................................82 
9.4 
Abnormal Test Findings ...............................................................................................83 
9.5 
Serious Adverse Events................................................................................................83 
9.6 
Hospitalization ...........................................................................................................83 
9.7 
Severity Assessment ....................................................................................................84 
9.8 
Causality Assessment ..................................................................................................84 
9.9 
Reporting Requirements...............................................................................................84 
9.9.1 
Serious adverse event reporting requirements ...........................................................85 
9.9.2 
Non-serious adverse event reporting requirements.....................................................85 
9.9.3 
Events of special interest .......................................................................................86 
9.9.4 
Pregnancy reporting requirements...........................................................................86 
10 CORRELATIVE STUDIES ................................................................................................87 
10.1 
Background and rationale .............................................................................................87 
10.2 
Potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to tucatinib ...........................................87 
10.3 
Potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to palbociclib........................................88 
10.4 
Potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to letrozole ...........................................88 
10.5 
Assessment of potential biomarkers of sensitivity to the study drugs ...................................88 
11 DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICAL METHODS ...........................................................89 
11.1 
Analytic plan for phase IB part of the study.....................................................................89 
11.1.1 
Analytic plan for primary endpoint .........................................................................90 
11.1.2 
Analytic plan for secondary endpoints .....................................................................91 
11.2 
Analytic plan for phase II part of the study ......................................................................92 
11.2.1 
Analytic plan for primary endpoint .........................................................................92 
11.2.2 
Analytic plan for secondary endpoints .....................................................................92 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 29 of 115 
 
11.3 
Early stopping rules.....................................................................................................93 
11.4 
Sample size justification...............................................................................................93 
12 DATA SAFETY MONITORING.........................................................................................94 
13 QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE .........................................................95 
13.1 
Clinical site monitoring................................................................................................95 
13.2 
Quality control (QC) procedures....................................................................................95 
14 DATA HANDLING AND RECORD KEEPING ....................................................................95 
14.1 
Case Report Forms/Electronic data record.......................................................................95 
14.2 
Record retention .........................................................................................................95 
15 ETHICS ...........................................................................................................................96 
15.1 
Institutional Review Board (IRB) ..................................................................................96 
15.2 
Ethical conduct of the trial............................................................................................97 
15.3 
Subject information and consent ....................................................................................97 
16 DEFINITION OF END OF TRIAL ......................................................................................97 
17 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................98 
18 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................... 104 
18.1 
Appendix A: List of abbreviations ............................................................................... 104 
18.2 
Appendix B: Performance status.................................................................................. 106 
18.3 
Appendix C: RECIST 1.1 criteria, RANO-BM criteria and bi-compartmental assessment of 
response............................................................................................................................. 106 
18.3.1 
RECIST criteria for solid tumors version 1.1 .......................................................... 106 
18.3.2 
RANO-BM criteria............................................................................................. 109 
18.3.3 
Bi-compartmental (CNS and non-CNS) response assessment .................................... 112 
18.3.4 
Bi-compartmental progression-free survival ........................................................... 112 
18.4 
Appendix D: List of prohibited medications and medication that require caution................. 112 
 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 30 of 115 
 
1 
CONCEPT AND RATIONALE  
 
1.1 
Hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer 
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer, excluding skin malignancies, and a 
second leading cause of cancer death after lung cancer in women in the United States [37]. 
Approximately 20% of breast cancers overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 
(HER2), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor mediating cell growth, differentiation, and 
survival [38]. HER2-positive (HER2+) breast tumors are more aggressive and historically have 
been associated with poorer outcomes compared to HER2-negative (HER2-) tumors, although the 
introduction of HER2-targeted therapies allowed for significant improvements in survival of 
subjects with HER2+ breast cancer [39-41]. Approximately half of HER2+ breast tumors 
overexpress hormone receptors (HR) [1, 2]. These cancers represent a significant therapeutic 
challenge because of a bi-directional cross-talk between estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 
pathways leading to accelerated tumor progression and resistance to targeted therapies [3, 4]. 
Preclinical and clinical data strongly suggest that HR expression is associated with decreased 
response to HER2-targeted agents [4, 8, 9], while HER2 overexpression confers intrinsic resistance 
to anti-hormonal treatments [2, 5-7].  
 
1.2 
HR expression confers resistance to HER2-targeted therapies 
In HR+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines, ER signaling and ER transcriptional activity are 
upregulated following trastuzumab and lapatinib treatment, and ER functions as the key 
escape/survival pathway leading to reduced sensitivity to HER2-targeted agents [8, 42, 43]. 
Retrospective analysis of clinical data showed that only 15% of HR+/HER2+ subjects achieved 
pathologic complete response (pCR) with neo-adjuvant transtuzumab and chemotherapy 
treatment, while pCR rate was almost 2 time higher (29%) in HR-/HER2+ subjects [44]. Data from 
prospective neo-adjuvant clinical trials such as NeoSphere [45], NeoALTTO [46], GeparQuinto 
[47], NOAH [48], ACOSOG Z1041 [49], and TBCRC 006 [50] consistently demonstrated lower 
pCR rates in HR+/HER2+ subjects regardless of the type of HER2-targeted agents used. Preclinical 
and clinical studies in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer confirmed that expression of HR was associated 
with reduced responsiveness to trastuzumab [8, 9], and addition of endocrine therapy to the HER2-
targeted agents led to modest progression free survival (PFS) benefits in a few trials [12, 13].  
 
1.3 
HER2 overexpression is associated with resistance to anti-hormonal therapy  
Crosstalk between ER and HER2 is a major determinant of resistance to endocrine therapy. 
In preclinical experiments, HR+ breast cancer cell lines that are sensitive to tamoxifen acquire 
tamoxifen resistance after transfection with HER2 oncogene [5, 7]. Analysis of tumor samples 
from postmenopausal patients with stage II and III HR+ breast cancers treated on two independent 
neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials showed that HR+/HER2+ tumors have statistically 
significantly higher histologic grade, higher Ki-67, and significantly less suppression of Ki-67 
after treatment with AI or tamoxifen compared with HR+/HER2- tumors. These tumors display 
continued estrogen-independent proliferation despite ongoing endocrine therapy [51]. Results of 
two adjuvant therapy clinical trials (Breast International Group 1-98 study and the Arimidex or 
Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) study) revealed that HER2+ status is associated with 
a significantly higher relapse rate, regardless of whether the hormonal therapy administered was 
an AI or tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting [52, 53]. Studies in metastatic breast cancer also showed 
that patients with HR+/HER2+ tumors have decreased responses to tamoxifen and aromatase 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 31 of 115 
 
inhibitors (AIs) [51, 53-56]. In patients with HR+/HER2+ tumors, median time-to-progression 
(TTP) on first-line endocrine therapy was 2 times shorter, comparing to patients with HR+/HER- 
tumors (5.5 months versus 11.2 months; P<0.001) [56].  
At present, endocrine therapy may be used as a standard first line treatment for 
asymptomatic patients with metastatic HR+/HER2+ breast cancer [57]. However, as described 
above, this therapy is frequently ineffective because of intrinsic resistance to endocrine agents 
conferred by overexpression of HER2 oncogene [51, 53-56].   
 
1.4 
Combining anti-hormonal and HER2-targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer 
Preclinical modeling in breast tumor cell lines and murine xenografts demonstrated 
synergy of HER2-targeted agents combined with endocrine therapy in suppressing growth of HR 
and HER2 positive breast tumors [8, 11]. However, translation of these exciting preclinical results 
into human clinical trials has been disappointing. Results of two randomized phase III clinical 
trials combining anti-hormonal therapy with HER2-targeted agents have been reported [12, 13]. 
TAnDEM trial evaluated the benefit of adding trastuzumab to anastrozole as a front-line therapy 
in patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Median PFS was 4.8 months for the 
combination group versus 2.4 months for the anastrozole monotherapy group, with a hazard ratio 
of 0.63 (P=0.016; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.84). In patients with centrally confirmed HR+ tumors, median 
PFS was 5.6 vs 3.8 month in the trastuzumab plus anastrozole and anastrozole alone arms, 
respectively (P=0.006). The ORR was significantly higher with the combination treatment 
compared with anastrozole alone (20.3% v 6.8%; P=018). The clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined 
as rate of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) 6 months or 
longer in duration, was also significantly higher in patients in the combination arm compared with 
those in the anastrozole arm (42.7% v 27.9%; P=0.026). No statistically significant improvement 
in overall survival (OS) was demonstrated, although median OS was numerically longer in patients 
receiving trastuzumab and anastrozole compared with patients receiving anastrozole monotherapy 
(28.5 v 23.9 months; P=0.325) [12].  
Similarly, in the EGF30008 study, anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib was 
combined with letrozole and compared with letrozole plus placebo in patients with HR+ metastatic 
breast cancer. In the HER2+ subgroup, the addition of lapatinib reduced risk of disease 
progression, with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (P=0.019; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96) and median PFS of 8.2 
versus 3.0 months. The ORR was also higher in the combination therapy group (28% v 15%; 
P=0.021). CBR was significantly greater for lapatinib plus letrozole (48% v 29%; odds ratio 0.4; 
95%CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P=0.03). Again, these benefits did not translate into an improvement in median 
OS (33.3 v 32.3 months) [13].  
Although TAnDEM and EGF30008 clinical trials showed statistically significant 
improvement of PFS in patients with HR+/HER2+ tumors with addition of HER2-targeted agents 
to endocrine therapy, these trials were not practice changing because PFS benefits were small, and 
no benefits in OS were demonstrated. What is not known is whether these results were due to 
limitations of specific HER2-targeted agents (trastuzumab, lapatinib), 
inherent endocrine 
resistance that was not counteracted by anti-HER2 therapy alone, other resistance mechanisms 
occurring, or a combination of all of these factors. New, rationally designed combinations of 
HER2-targeted and anti-hormonal agents are warranted.   
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 32 of 115 
 
1.5 
CDK4/6 inhibitors synergize with anti-hormonal and HER2-targeted agents 
 
Activation of cell cycle checkpoints – cyclin D1 and cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 
and 6 – plays a critical role in the tumorigenesis of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer [14-16]. Mitogenic 
signaling from HER2 and HR receptors converges at cell cycle checkpoints and results in the 
increased cyclin D1 expression. In mouse models, cyclin D1 activity is critical for the development 
of breast tumors, and deletion of cyclin D1 gene limits tumor growth driven by HER2 oncogene 
[18, 19]. Cyclin D1 and CDK4 are commonly amplified in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, and the 
frequency of these amplification events is higher comparing to other breast cancer subtypes [17].  
Inhibition of cyclin D1 - CDK4/6 complex emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in 
luminal breast cancer. In a pivotal study of CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, Finn and colleagues [14] 
compared baseline gene expression profiles from breast cancer cell lines highly sensitive and 
resistant to palbociclib. HR+ cell lines, including those with HER2 amplification, were the most 
sensitive, and there was a significant overlap between the gene expression profiles associated with 
palbociclib sensitivity and that which distinguishes a luminal breast cancer subtype [14].  
Palbociclib was FDA approved in patient with HR+ metastatic breast cancer based on the 
results of PALOMA-1 randomized phase II clinical trial, where it showed marked improvement 
in median PFS in women who received palbociclib and letrozole versus letrozole alone (26.1 
versus 7.5 months) [20]. Additionally, palbociclib demonstrated remarkable activity in the second 
line metastatic setting in combination with fulvestrant in the PALOMA-3 clinical trial, resulting 
in more than doubling of median PFS (9.2 months palbociclib with fulvestrant vs 3.8 months 
placebo with fulvestrant; HR 0.42; P <0.001) [58]. In preclinical studies, palbociclib was active 
against both luminal A (HR+/HER2-) and luminal B (HR+/HER2+) breast tumors, and synergized 
with both tamoxifen and anti-HER2 agents (trastuzumab, lapatinib, and TDM-1) providing a 
potent addition to anti-hormonal and HER2-targeted therapies [14, 16, 21].  
The ability of CDK4/6 inhibitors to synergize with HER2-targeted agents and overcome 
de-novo and acquired endocrine resistance may prove extremely useful in patients with 
HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Several clinical trials are ongoing in Europe to test combinations of 
CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy and HER2-targeted agents. A phase II clinical trial of 
palbociclib in combination with trastuzumab with and without letrozole (PATRICIA) is recruiting 
patients in Spain (NCT02448420; www. clinicaltrials.gov). A trial of neo-adjuvant palbociclib 
added to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and fulvestrant is ongoing in Italy (NCT02530424). As of 
October 2016, no active clinical trials existed in the US that would be testing the triple combination 
of anti-endocrine, CDK4/6 targeted and HER2-targeted agents for HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, 
making this proposal both novel and with potential high impact to the breast cancer field. 
 
1.6 
Novel HER2-targeted small molecule inhibitor tucatinib synergizes with palbociclib 
and fulvestrant in tumor cell lines 
 
In our laboratory, we performed cell proliferation assays titrating novel HER2 tyrosine 
kinase inhibitor tucatinib, palbociclib and fulvestrant in BT474 and MDA-MB-361 HR+/HER2+ 
tumor cell lines. In our experiments we used fulvestrant instead of letrozole, as letrozole has no 
activity in tumor cell line models, unless the cells are transfected with the aromatase gene. Results 
showed productive interaction between tucatinib, palbociclib and fulvestrant in reducing cell 
proliferation and improving tumor cell killing (Fig. 1). 
  
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 33 of 115 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fig. 1. Titration of palbociclib, tucatinib and fulvestrant in HR+/HER2+ tumor cell lines 
 
1.7 
Rationale for combining HER2-targeted agents with anti-hormonal agents and 
CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer 
We hypothesized that in subjects with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, treatment 
with a novel HER2-targeted agent tucatinib, combined with an aromatase inhibitor leterozole and 
CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib will result in synergistic suppression of tumor growth and significant 
improvement in progression free survival (PFS). To test this hypothesis, we proposed a phase Ib/II 
clinical trial. 
Tucatinib is a novel potent oral small-molecule inhibitor highly selective for HER2 
receptor tyrosine kinase [25]. One of the key features of tucatinib is its potency and selectivity for 
HER2 compared to the closely related kinase EGFR. With a 500-fold increase in potency for HER2 
inhibition compared to EGFR, tucatinib has the potential to inhibit HER2 signaling while avoiding 
known EGFR-related side effects (severe skin rash and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity) [22]. 
Tucatinib has been tested in breast cancer subjects in several phase I clinical trials showing 
significant antitumor activity and very favorable toxicity profile [23-25, 59]. 
This  clinical trial will test combination therapy of tucatinib in the dose of 300 mg PO BID 
with palbociclib in a standard dose of 125 mg PO daily for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days 
off treatment and letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily in subjects with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. 
In this clinical trial, we will first determine that the recommended dose of tucatinib combines with 
the FDA approved doses of palbociclib and letrozole with no unexpected overlapping toxicities 
that would require dose decreases for the combination. This will be followed by testing our drug 
combination in the expansion cohort of subjects with metastatic HR+/HER2+ positive breast 
BT-474 tucatinib and fulvestrant
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
-50
0
50
100
Combination
Tucatinib
Fulvestrant
0.013           0.025         0.038         0.05   Tucatinib (µM)
Fulvestrant (µM)
Growth inhibtion / lethality
BT-474 tucatinib and palbociclib
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
-100
-50
0
50
100
Combination
Tucatinib
Palbociclib
0.016       0.025     0.034      0.041       0.05   Tucatinib (µM)
Palbo (µM)
Growth inhibtion / lethality
MDA-MB-361 tucatinib and palbociclib
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
-50
0
50
100
Combination
Tucatinib
Palbociclib
0.008    0.017     0.025    0.033     0.042   0.05   Tucatinib (µM)
Palbo (µM)
Growth inhibtion / lethality
MDA-MB-361 tucatinib and fulvestrant
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
-50
0
50
100
Combination
Tucatinib
Fulvestrant
0.013           0.025         0.038         0.05   Tucatinib (µM)
Fulvestrant (µM)
Growth inhibtion / lethality

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 34 of 115 
 
cancer, to further delineate the safety and assess efficacy of tucatinib combined with palbociclib 
and letrozole. 
Tucatinib and palbociclib have largely non-overlapping toxicity profiles. Most common 
serious side effects of palbociclib are neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia, while most common 
serious adverse events (SAEs) caused by tucatinib are liver function test abnormalities. Non-
overlapping toxicity profiles taken together with potentially synergistic mechanism of action of 
palbociclib and tucatinib provide rational for combining these agents with letrozole in 
HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer subjects. In addition to the rationale for the synergy of 
targeting these three pathways simultaneously in this disease setting and its potential for anti-tumor 
efficacy, we propose this novel combination of three oral agents, if well tolerated, will be highly 
subject-centered as an effective, all orally administered, non-chemotherapy based regimen for 
treatment of HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. 
 
2 
STUDY DRUGS 
2.1 
Tucatinib 
2.1.1 Mechanism of action 
Tucatinib [ARRAY-380, ONT-380] is an orally available, reversible HER2 small molecule 
tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is being developed as a novel treatment for HER2+ breast cancer. 
One of the key features of tucatinib is its potency and selectivity for HER2 compared to the closely 
related kinase EGFR. With a 500-fold increase in potency for HER2 inhibition compared to EGFR, 
tucatinib has the potential to inhibit HER2 signaling while avoiding known EGFR-related side 
effects, in particular, severe skin rash and gastrointestinal toxicity [22]. This unique feature 
differentiates tucatinib from other HER2 inhibitors, including neratinib, afatinib and lapatinib, 
which inhibit HER2 and EGFR with similar potency and are associated with side effects of EGFR 
inhibition. 
 
2.1.2 In vitro biochemistry and cell biology 
Using a panel of 223 protein kinases, the only enzymes inhibited by tucatinib by 75% when 
tested at either 1 or 10 μM were members of the ErbB kinase family (HER2, EGFR, and HER4). 
Further analysis of this family of kinases using biochemical assays demonstrated tucatinib 
inhibited HER2 with an IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) of 22 nM and was less active 
against EGFR (IC50=94 nM) and HER4 (IC50=370 nM). The selectivity of tucatinib for HER2 is 
better exemplified in assays designed to measure the inhibition of HER2 and EGFR auto-
phosphorylation using tumor cell lines. In the HER2 overexpressing cell line BT-474, tucatinib 
inhibited the phosphorylation of HER2 with an IC50=8 nM and inhibited the phosphorylation of 
Akt, a downstream effector of HER2, with an IC50=3 nM. Consistent with the potent inhibition of 
HER2 phosphorylation in this cell line, tucatinib blocked the proliferation of BT-474 cells with an 
IC50=11 nM. In contrast, tucatinib only weakly inhibited the phosphorylation of EGFR in the 
overexpressing cell line A431, producing an IC50=4000 nM and only inhibited proliferation of 
A431 cells at drug concentrations greater than 1 mM. These data demonstrate a high degree of 
selectivity (500-fold) for HER2 relative to EGFR and are consistent with the idea that tucatinib 
has the capacity to block HER2 signaling without the contributing toxicities of EGFR inhibition. 
 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 35 of 115 
 
2.1.3 In vivo pharmacology 
Tucatinib has been studied in a variety of in vivo HER2+ tumor models. Tucatinib at doses 
of 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg significantly inhibited tumor growth in subcutaneous tumor models 
derived from BT-474 HR+/HER2+ breast tumor cell line. In the BT-474 model, tumor growth 
inhibition by tucatinib was 81% at 50 mg/kg and was greater than the inhibition observed with 
trastuzumab (20 mg/kg). Additionally, tucatinib was evaluated in combination with trastuzumab 
or docetaxel in subcutaneous HER2+ tumor models. The drug doublets were well tolerated and 
more efficacious than any single agent. When tucatinib was combined with trastuzumab (20 
mg/kg) in the BT-474 model, the anti-tumor activity exceeded either drug when dosed as a single 
agent. Similarly, the combination of tucatinib with docetaxel (10 mg/kg) in the BT-474 model was 
also more effective than either single agent. To determine the potential of tucatinib in treating brain 
metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, tucatinib was tested using BT-474 intracranial tumor implants. 
Treatment of mice with tucatinib in the dose of 75 mg/kg BID conferred a significant survival 
benefit compared with lapatinib in the dose of 50 mg/kg BID, or neratinib in the dose of 40 mg/kg 
QID when each drug was dosed at the MTD in the BT-474 model. Taken together, these data 
support the hypothesis that tucatinib is effective for treatment of HER2+ breast cancer that has 
metastasized to the brain. 
 
2.1.4 Non-clinical safety 
Good Laboratory Practice toxicology, safety pharmacology, and tolerability studies with 
tucatinib have been conducted in rats and cynomolgous monkeys to extrapolate the safety of 
administering the drug to humans. Taken together, these studies have demonstrated that tucatinib 
has a satisfactory safety profile and presents limited risk in humans. Doses of 30 mg/kg BID in 
rats and 10 mg/kg BID in monkeys were well tolerated over the 28-days testing period. Safety 
pharmacology studies were conducted to examine the effect of tucatinib on cardiovascular function 
using in vitro human ether-a-go-go related gene (hERG) inhibition assays, and by in vivo telemetry 
using cynomolgous monkeys. Titration of tucatinib in the hERG assay produced an IC50=13.5 μM, 
and there were no significant effects noted in mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate or 
electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms or in QT and corrected QT (QTc) measurements in the in 
vivo study. There were also no effects noted in gastrointestinal secretion and propulsion, 
neurobehavioral, or respiratory function studies performed in rats. 
Tucatinib has a low risk of mutagenicity. Tucatinib was non-mutagenic when tested using 
bacterial reverse mutation (Ames test) or L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma cell assays. In addition, 
at doses up to 2000 mg/kg, tucatinib was negative for the induction of micronucleated 
polychromatic erythrocytes in mice. 
 
Important data on potential embryo-toxicity of tucatinib were obtained in preclinical 
studies in pregnant rabbits. Tucatinib doses of ≥90mg/kg/day lead to fetal external and visceral 
malformations, including domed head with severe dilation of the lateral and third ventricles. Other 
malformations included hyperflexed forepaw, herniated umbilicus, organ malposition, and 
vascular malformations and variations. Given preclinical findings of embryo-toxicity, all 
women of childbearing potential should have negative pregnancy test prior to staring 
tucatinib, and should use effective measures of contraception while on tucatinib and 30 days 
after stopping tucatinib.  
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 36 of 115 
 
 
 
2.1.5 Pharmacokinetics, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion 
Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies conducted with tucatinib in mice, rats, and monkeys showed 
good exposure in all three nonclinical species with calculated absolute oral bioavailability (F) 
values of 22% to 34% in rats and exceeding 100% in monkeys. Tucatinib is a high permeability 
compound. It is both an inhibitor and a substrate for P-glycoprotein and is highly, but reversibly, 
bound to plasma proteins in vitro across multiple species (>93% bound). Tucatinib demonstrates 
good-to-moderate stability with respect to hepatic metabolism across species. Tucatinib is 
metabolized by CYP450 enzymes in human liver, primarily by CYP2C8 and to a lesser extent by 
CYP3A4. Strong CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers should not be administered in 
combination with tucatinib in order to minimize the risk of potential drug-drug interaction. 
Tucatinib exhibited moderate in vitro inhibition of CYPs 2C8 and 2C9 in addition to moderate 
inhibition of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). In vivo evaluations of [14C]-tucatinib 
showed tucatinib-related radioactivity distributed to the liver, lungs, and kidneys and excreted 
predominantly into bile and feces, with ONT-993 being the predominant metabolite. 
 
In vitro, tucatinib inhibited CYP3A4 at concentrations approximately 10 times higher than 
clinically relevant concentrations; time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 was not observed and 
tucatinib did not induce in vitro activity of CYP3A4 or CYP1A2 in human hepatocytes. However, 
different results in respect to CYP3A4 inhibition were obtained in healthy volunteers. Preliminary 
pharmacokinetic (PK) results from Study ONT-380-012 indicate that coadministration of multiple 
doses of tucatinib (300 mg BID) with midazolam (a sensitive CYP3A substrate) increased the 
geometric mean midazolam exposure (AUC) approximately 5.85-fold (90% CI 5.14 to 6.66) in 
healthy subjects, compared with administration of midazolam alone. Therefore, tucatinib is a 
strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, and its use together with sensitive CYP3A4 substrate should be 
avoided, or doses of sensitive CYP3A4 substrates should be adjusted accordingly. 
 
2.1.6 Summary of clinical studies 
Tucatinib (ARRAY-380, ONT-380) has been investigated in multiple clinical studies. 
Three studies have been completed, including two Phase 1 formulation studies in healthy subjects 
and a Phase 1 single-agent, dose-escalation study with an expansion cohort in HER2+ breast cancer 
patients at the MTD (Table 1). Other clinical trials are underway to examine the safety and efficacy 
of tucatinib when combined with other anti-HER2 therapies (Table 2). The most important selected 
clinical studies are highlighted below in sections 2.1.7 – 2.1.9.  
 
Table 1. Completed Clinical Studies 
 
Study ID 
Design/Objective 
Treatment 
Population/ 
Enrollment 
Results 
ARRAY-
380-101 
Phase 1, single agent, 
open-label, dose-
escalation study to 
identify the MTD/RP2D 
of Array-380 capsules 
(PIC) and to assess 
safety, PK, and 
preliminary efficacy. 
Dose-escalation 
phase: 25 to 800 mg 
PO BID in 28-day 
cycles. Expansion 
phase: 600 mg PO 
BID in 28-day 
cycles 
HER2+ 
metastatic 
breast cancer. 
50 subjects 
enrolled, 
including 31 at 
doses ≥ 600mg 
MTD 600 mg PO BID 
(PIC). Among 35 
subjects evaluable for 
efficacy, 5 subjects 
with PR (14%), 18 
subjects with SD (51%) 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 37 of 115 
 
ARRAY-
380-102 
Phase 1, open-label, 
single-dose, fixed-
sequence, 4-period 
crossover study to 
evaluate the PK, relative 
bioavailability, and 
safety of four Array-380 
formulations in healthy 
subjects 
Single 300 mg PO 
dose of Array-380 
in 4 treatment 
formulations: 
1. Capsules (PIC) 
2. Micronized PIC 
3. Aqueous 
suspension 
4. Captisol®/apple 
juice solution 
14 healthy 
subjects 
The relative 
bioavailability of 
ARRY-380 (AUC and 
Cmax) was higher 
following the 
micronized PIC and 
aqueous suspension 
formulations, and 
lower following the 
20% Captisol®/apple 
juice solution 
compared to the control 
capsule (PIC 
formulation) 
ARRAY-
380-103 
Phase 1, open-label, 
single-dose, fixed-
sequence, 4-period 
crossover study to 
evaluate the PK, relative 
bioavailability, potential 
food effect, omeprazole 
drug interaction, and 
safety of Array-380 PO 
capsules and tablets in 
healthy subjects 
Single 300 mg PO 
dose of Array-380 
in each of 4 
treatment periods: 
1. Capsules (PIC) 
2. Tablets (fasted) 
3. Tablets (fed) 
4. Tablets (fasted) 
following 
omeprazole 40 mg x 
5 days 
12 healthy 
subjects 
Array-380 metabolism 
was not affected by 
formulation, food, or 
gastric pH. Tablet and 
capsule had similar 
bioavailability. Higher 
drug exposure with the 
tablet formulation in 
fed state 
ONT-380-
008 
Phase I single-dose, 
open-label study to 
(1) Determine the mass 
balance of total 
radioactivity from [14C]-
tucatinib 
(2) Determine the routes 
and rates of elimination 
of total radioactivity 
from [14C]-tucatinib  
(3) Determine the 
urinary excretion of 
tucatinib and the 
metabolite ONT-993 
following administration 
of [14C]-tucatinib  
(4) Characterize the PK 
of tucatinib, ONT-993, 
and total radioactivity 
following administration 
of [14C]-tucatinib to 
healthy male and female 
subjects  
Single dose of 300 
mg of [14C]-
tucatinib containing 
approximately 150 
μCi of [14C] 
radioactivity, 
administered as an 
oral solution after 
an overnight fast.  
8 healthy 
subjects 
Determined routes and 
rates of elimination of 
tucatinib and its 
metabolite ONT-993 
and characterized their 
PKs 
ONT-380-
009 
Phase I single-dose, 
open-label study to 
evaluate the PK profile 
Tucatinib 300mg as 
a single dose 
37 hepatically 
impaired and 
No difference in 
plasma exposure of 
tucatinib between 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 38 of 115 
 
of tucatinib in subjects 
with impaired hepatic 
function compared to 
control subjects  
healthy 
subjects 
subjects with normal 
hepatic function and 
with mild hepatic 
impairment, however, 
in subjects with 
moderate or severe 
impairment tucatinib 
exposure is increased 
ONT-380-
011 
Phase I single-dose, 
open-label study to 
evaluate the PK profile 
of tucatinib in subjects 
with impaired hepatic 
function compared to 
control subjects  
Treatment A: 
tucatinib 300 mg PO  
Treatment B: 
placebo PO  
Treatment C: 
moxifloxain 400 mg 
PO  
53 healthy 
subjects 
No changes in cardiac 
repolarization on 
tucatinib  
ONT-380-
012 
Phase I open-label, 
fixed-sequence, 5-part 
study:  
Part A: to assess the 
effect of a strong 
CYP3A4 inhibitor 
(itraconazole) on the 
single dose PK of 
tucatinib.  
Part B: to assess the 
effect of an inducer of 
CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 
(rifampin) on the single 
dose PK of tucatinib.  
Part C: to assess the 
effect of a strong 
CYP2C8 inhibitor 
(gemfibrozil) on the 
single dose PK of 
tucatinib.  
Part D: to assess the 
effects of tucatinib on the 
single dose PK of 
substrate probes of 
CYP2C8 (repaglinide), 
CYP2C9 (tolbutamide), 
and CYP3A4 
(midazolam).  
Part E: to assess the 
effect of tucatinib on the 
single dose PK of a 
substrate probe of P-gp 
(digoxin).  
Tucatinib 300 mg 
PO and itraconazole 
200 mg (Part A), 
rifampin 600 mg 
(Part B), 
gemfibrozil 600 mg 
(Part C), repaglinide 
0.5 mg (Part D), 
tolbutamide 500 mg 
(Part D), midazolam 
500 mg (Part D), 
and digoxin 5 mg 
(Part E)  
 
116 healthy 
subjects 
Data on tucatinib 
metabolism and drug-
drug interaction  
SGNTUC-
015 
Phase I open-label study 
to evaluate the PK of 
tucatinib and its 
Tucatinib 50, 150, 
300 mg PO  
 
36 healthy 
subjects 
PKs of tucatinib in 
Asian patient 
population 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 39 of 115 
 
metabolite (ONT-993) in 
Japanese and Caucasian 
subjects  
SGNTUC-
020 
Phase I open-label study 
to assess the effects of 
multiple BID oral doses 
of tucatinib on the 
single-dose PK of 
metformin, a substrate of 
MATE1/2-K.  
Tucatinib 300 mg 
PO Metformin 850 
mg PO Iohexol 
1500 mg IV  
 
18 heatlhy 
subjects 
Data on tucatinib 
metabolism and drug-
drug interaction 
Abbreviations: twice daily (BID); immunohistochemistry (IHC); fluorescence in situ hybridization 
(FISH); maximum-tolerated dose (MTD); oral (PO); powder in capsule (PIC); pharmacokinetics 
(PK); area under the curve (AUC); Cmax (maximum concentration observed); partial response 
(PR); recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D); stable disease (SD). 
 
Table 2. Ongoing Clinical Studies 
 
Study ID 
Design/Objective 
Treatment 
Status 
ONT-380-004 
Phase 1b, open-label, dose-
escalation trial to determine the 
MTD/RP2D of ONT-380 
tablets given in combination 
with T-DM1 in patients with 
metastatic breast cancer 
previously treated with 
trastuzumab and a taxane. 
Expansion cohort in subjects 
with CNS metastasis at the 
MTD/RP2D. (Sponsor: 
Oncothyreon – now Seattle 
Genetics, Inc.) 
Dose-escalation: 
Tucatinib: 300 mg or 
350 mg PO BID T-
DM1: 3.6 mg/kg IV 
on Day 1 21-day 
cycles  
Expansion (at 
MTD): Tucatinib: 300 
mg PO BID T-DM1: 
3.6 mg/kg IV on Day 
1 21-day cycles  
Active, completed 
enrollment of 57 
subjects. MTD of 
ONT-380 in 
combination with T-
DM1 is 300 mg PO 
BID 
ONT-380-005 
Phase 1b, open-label, dose-
escalation trial to determine the 
MTD/RP2D of ONT-380 
tablets given in combination 
with trastuzumab, capecitabine, 
and trastuzumab + capecitabine 
in patients with metastatic 
breast cancer previously treated 
with trastuzumab and T-DM1. 
Expansion cohort in patients 
with CNS metastasis at the 
MTD/RP2D (Sponsor: 
Oncothyreon – now Seattle 
Genetics, Inc.) 
ONT-380 in 
escalating doses, 
starting at 300 mg PO 
BID. Capecitabine at 
1000 mg/m2 PO BID 
on Days 1–14 of each 
21-day cycle. 
Trastuzumab as a 
loading dose of 8 
mg/kg followed by 6 
mg/kg once q21 days 
Active, completed 
enrollment. RP2D of 
ONT-380 in 
combination with 
capecitabine, 
trastuzumab, and 
capecitabine + 
trastuzumab is 300 mg 
PO BID 
ONT-380-206 
(HER2CLIMB) 
NCT02614794 
Phase II randomized double-
blinded controlled study of 
ONT-380 (tucatinib) vs 
placebo in combo with 
capecitabine and trastuzumab 
Tucatinib 300mg PO 
BID or placebo in 
combination with 
capecitabine 1000 
mg/m2 PO BID on 
Ongoing 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 40 of 115 
 
in subjects with metastatic 
HER2+ breast cancer (Sponsor: 
Oncothyreon – now Seattle 
Genetics, Inc.) 
days 1-14 of each 21-
day cycle, and with 
trastuzumab 6 mg/kg 
IV every 21 days 
HER2CLIMB-02 
(SGNTUC-016)  
Phase III randomized, double-
blind, placebo-controlled to 
compare PFS by investigator 
assessment per RECIST v1.1 
between treatment arms  
Tucatinib or Placebo: 
300 mg PO BID T-
DM1: 3.6 mg/kg IV 
every 21 days  
Ongoing 
MOUNTAINEER 
(SGNTUC-017)  
 
Phase II randomized, open-
label to determine the 
antitumor activity of tucatinib 
given in combination with 
trastuzumab, in Cohorts A+B, 
as measured by confirmed 
ORR per RECIST 1.1, 
according to BICR assessment  
Tucatinib 300 mg PO 
BID Trastuzumab: 8 
mg/kg IV Day 1 
Cycle 1, 6 mg/kg IV 
Day 1 subsequent 
cycles 21-day cycles  
Cohorts A+B = 
tucatinib + 
trastuzumab  
Cohort C = tucatinib 
monotherapy  
Ongoing 
380-IST-001 
DFCI 13-198 
Phase 1, dose-escalation trial of 
ARRAY-380 (aka ONT-380) 
tablets in combination with 
trastuzumab in participants 
with brain metastases from 
HER2+ breast cancer to 
determine MTD/RP2D of 
ONT-380 given in combination 
with trastuzumab (Sponsor: 
Dana Farber Cancer Institute) 
Array/ONT-380 in 
escalating doses, 
starting at 450 mg PO 
BID, given 
irrespective of food. 
Additional arm with 
once daily dosing of 
ONT-380 starting at 
750 mg PO daily. 
Trastuzumab at 6 
mg/kg IV q3 weeks 
Ongoing 
380-IST-002 
Academic and 
Community 
Cancer Research 
United 
A Phase II, Open Label Study 
of Tucatinib Combined With 
Trastuzumab in Patients With 
HER2+ Metastatic Colorectal 
Cancer (MOUNTAINEER) 
Tucatinib (tablet 
formulation) 300 mg 
PO BID of every 21-
day cycle and 
trastuzumab 8 mg/kg 
IV loading dose Day 1 
Cycle 1, followed by 
6 mg/kg IV Day 1 of 
all subsequent cycles 
Ongoing 
Abbreviations: twice daily (BID); central nervous system (CNS); intravenous (IV); maximum-
tolerated dose/recommended Phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D); orally (PO).  
 
2.1.7 Clinical study ARRAY-380-101 
Array-380 has been studied in an open-label, single-agent, Phase 1 dose-escalation study 
with an MTD expansion cohort conducted at four sites in the US and Canada. Array-380 was 
administered in capsule (PIC) on a BID dosing schedule. The study was originally designed to 
enroll subjects with advanced solid tumors known to express HER2. Later, it was amended to 
allow only subjects with documented HER2+ cancers. This study was designed to identify the 
MTD and to assess the safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy of Array-380 capsules with doses 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 41 of 115 
 
ranging from 25 to 800 mg administered PO BID. A total of 33 patients were treated in the dose-
escalation phase, and 17 additional patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in the expansion 
cohort. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median number of five prior treatment regimens. 
All breast cancer patients had received prior trastuzumab, and 88% of these patients had received 
prior lapatinib. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥ 20% of patients, 
regardless of relationship to study drug, were nausea (56%); diarrhea (52%); fatigue (48%); 
vomiting (40%); rash (24%), constipation, cough, and pain in extremity (20% each). Of these 
events, the majority were Grade 1 in severity. Grade 3 TEAEs were reported by 21 of 50 patients 
(42%) and those occurring in > 1 patient included anemia and cellulitis (6% each); and abdominal 
pain, 
hypokalemia, 
increased 
alanine 
aminotransferase 
(ALT), 
increased 
aspartate 
aminotransferase (AST), musculoskeletal chest pain, and vomiting (4% each). In patients treated 
at the MTD, Grade 3 events included 1 event each of diarrhea (of 1 day duration), erythematous 
rash, and ALT/AST elevation. The 800 mg BID dose was deemed a non-tolerated dose due to the 
occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 2 of 4 patients treated at that level, both of whom 
experienced Grade 3 liver transaminase elevation, which reversed upon interruption of therapy. 
Both patients were able to resume treatment at the next lower dose level. 600 mg BID was declared 
to be the single-agent MTD for the PIC formulation. Seventeen additional patients were enrolled 
in the expansion phase of the study at the MTD. Among the 35 patients evaluable for efficacy at 
any dose level, best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was PR 
in 5 patients (14%), SD in 18 patients (51%), and progressive disease (PD) in 12 patients (34%). 
Among patients treated at doses of ≥ 600 mg BID with measurable disease at baseline, the CBR 
was 27% (6/22), including 3 PRs and 3 SDs. All 3 patients with PR had received prior trastuzumab, 
and 2 had also received prior lapatinib. 
 
2.1.8 Clinical study ONT-380-004 
ONT-380 was evaluated in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study in combination with TDM-1 
in subjects with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer previously treated with both trastuzumab and a 
taxane. This study utilized the tablet formulation of ONT-380 rather than the PIC formulation used 
in ARRAY-380-101. The purpose of this study was to identify the MTD/RP2D of ONT-380 
administered BID in combination with the approved dose of T-DM1 of 3.6 mg/kg every 21 days. 
Other objectives include evaluation of safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy. Three initial dose-
escalation cohorts of ONT-380 were planned: 300 mg BID, 450 mg BID, and 600 mg BID. Patients 
with untreated CNS metastases or treated stable CNS metastases were eligible for the initial dose-
escalation cohorts and MTD/RP2D expansion cohort. Patients with either untreated CNS 
metastases or CNS metastases that had progressed after previous radiation were eligible for the 
CNS expansion cohort. The study is active with completed enrollment. The first patient treated in 
the 300 mg cohort experienced a DLT of reversible Grade 3 AST/ALT elevation. The cohort was 
subsequently expanded and enrolled 7 additional patients, with no additional DLTs. However, PK 
results from this group suggested that ONT-380 drug exposure at the 300 mg BID dose (tablet 
formulation) was similar to that observed at the single-agent MTD dose of 600 mg PO BID using 
the PIC formulation. As a result, the ONT-380 300 mg BID cohort was further expanded to include 
10 additional patients to allow better characterization of ONT-380 PK and safety. Two additional 
patients experienced DLT in the expanded 300 mg cohort: one case of reversible Grade 3 
ALT/AST elevation, and one case of Grade 2 vomiting with complicating features (Grade 1 
diarrhea), for an overall DLT rate of 3/18 (17%). A 50 mg tablet became available, and a new 
cohort was opened using ONT-380 at 350 mg BID with the same standard dose of T-DM1. At this 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 42 of 115 
 
dose, 3/7 pts (43%) experienced DLT (one case each of Grade 3 vomiting, Grade 3 
hypersensitivity, and Grade 3 fatigue). This dose was therefore found to be not tolerated, and the 
MTD for ONT-380 for this combination was declared to be 300 mg PO BID. The protocol was 
subsequently amended to allow up to 30 patients to be treated at the MTD/RD expansion cohort 
to further characterize the safety and PK of the combination. The most common AEs (occurring 
in >10% of patients), regardless of relationship, have been nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, 
thrombocytopenia, 
AST/ALT elevation, 
headache, decreased appetite, constipation, 
and 
hypokalemia. Grade 3 AST/ALT elevation has occurred in 7/43 pts (16%), with no events meeting 
Hy’s law (AST/ALT >3X upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevation of serum total bilirubin to 
≥2X ULN without initial findings of cholestasis and no other explanation of liver findings) [60] 
and has been reversible with dose interruption and reduction except in 2 patients found to have 
progressive liver metastases. ONT-380 PK has been dose proportional, and no drug-drug 
interaction has been observed with T-DM1. In 33 of 43 subjects with data available from at least 
one follow-up scan to evaluate response, best systemic response regardless of dose was 11 PR, 16 
SD, and 6 PD, with CBR of 19/33 (58%). The most common reason for treatment discontinuation 
was PD, with 3 subjects coming off study for AEs (n=1 each of Grade 3 hypersensitivity, Grade 2 
vomiting, Grade 3 AST/ALT elevation). In conclusion, in this study, tucatinib in combination with 
T-DM1 appeared to have acceptable toxicity and to show preliminary antitumor activity among 
heavily pretreated patients with ERBB2/HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with and without 
brain metastases [61]. 
 
2.1.9 Clinical study ONT-380-005 
ONT-380 in a tablet formulation has been evaluated in a Phase 1b dose-escalation study 
with trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer previously 
treated with both trastuzumab and T-DM1. It is a parallel dose-escalation study to evaluate the 
MTD/RP2D of ONT-380 in combination with either trastuzumab (8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg 
once q21 days) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 PO BID on Days 1–14 of each 21-day cycle), 
followed by evaluation of the MTD/RP2D for the three-drug combination. Other objectives 
include assessment of safety, PKs, and anti-tumor activity of the three different combinations. 
Three initial dose-escalation cohorts of ONT-380 were planned: 300 mg BID, 450 mg BID, and 
600 mg BID. Patients with untreated CNS metastases or treated stable CNS metastases were 
eligible for the initial dose escalation cohorts and MTD/RD expansion cohort. Patients with either 
untreated CNS metastases or CNS metastases that had progressed after previous radiation were 
eligible for the CNS expansion cohorts. Two cohorts were initially opened, using ONT-380 at a 
dose of 300 mg BID combined with either capecitabine or trastuzumab. No DLTs were seen in 
either of these initial two cohorts, and enrollment was expanded to better characterize the safety 
and PK of these two drug combinations, with 7 patients treated with ONT-380 300 mg BID plus 
capecitabine, and 9 patients treated with ONT-380 300 mg BID plus trastuzumab. Initial PK data 
from these cohorts along with data from the concurrent ONT-380-004 study suggested that ONT-
380 drug exposure at the 300 mg BID dose level was similar to that seen with the single agent 
MTD dose of 600 mg PO BID using the PIC formulation. Therefore, the study safety monitoring 
committee recommended against dose escalation to the original planned 450 mg BID dose level, 
and instead the three drug combination cohort of ONT-380 + capecitabine and trastuzumab was 
opened using ONT-380 at a dose of 300 mg BID. One of the first three patients treated in this 
cohort experienced DLT (grade 4 cerebral edema confirmed by MRI). This patient had an 
untreated metastasis in the thalamus and had neurologic symptoms on Cycle 1 Day 7. The patient’s 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 43 of 115 
 
symptoms resolved within 48 hours after initiating treatment with corticosteroids. She 
discontinued capecitabine permanently and held ONT-380 for two weeks, with no recurrence of 
symptoms upon ONT-380 rechallenge. The cohort was subsequently expanded per dose escalation 
guidelines, and no additional DLTs have been seen in the other 10 patients in this cohort. Following 
the availability of 50 mg tablets, two new dose escalation cohorts were opened evaluating ONT-
380 at 350 mg BID in combination with either capecitabine alone (n=4) or trastuzumab alone 
(n=4). While no events occurred during the protocol-defined period to qualify for a DLT for either 
of these combinations at this dose, two patients experienced events leading to dose reductions or 
discontinuations of ONT-380 in later cycles due to GI toxicity, including one case each of Grade 
3 diarrhea and Grade 3 nausea/vomiting. Because of these events, along with PK data showing 
that patients treated at 350 mg BID of the tablet formulation had drug exposure above that of 
patients treated at the single agent MTD of the PIC formulation, the study safety monitoring 
committee declared RP2D as 300 mg BID for all combinations in the study, and MTD/RP2D non-
CNS 
and 
CNS expansion 
cohorts 
were opened 
for 
both 
the 
trastuzumab 
and 
capecitabine/trastuzumab combinations. The study is active, completed enrollment. Adverse 
events seen at the recommended phase 2 dose regardless of causality, grade, and treatment group 
included diarrhea (35 [67%] of 52 patients), nausea (31 [60%] patients), palmar-plantar 
erythrodysesthesia syndrome (23 [44%] patients), fatigue (20 [38%] patients), and vomiting (20 
[38%] patients). In all patients, treatment-related toxicities of grade 3 and worse included fatigue 
(five [8%] patients), diarrhea (four [7%] patients), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (four 
[7%] patients). No treatment-related deaths were reported. The proportion of patients with 
measurable disease achieving objective response was 83% (five of six patients) in the combination 
of tucatinib with capecitabine, 40% (six of 15 patients) in the combination of tucatinib with 
trastuzumab, and 61% (14 of 23 patients) in the combination of tucatinib with both capecitabine 
and trastuzumab. In conclusion, tucatinib in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab had 
acceptable toxicity and showed preliminary anti-tumor activity [62].  
 
2.1.10 Clinical pharmacokinetic results 
Pharmacokinetics parameters were determined in a Phase 1 single dose range finding study 
with MTD expansion cohort (ARRAY-380-101) using a PIC formulation. Dose-proportionality 
was observed across the dose range, ARRAY-380 time of maximum concentration observed 
(Tmax) ranged from 1 hr to 4 hrs with elimination half-life (t1/2) of 5 to 7 hrs. Steady state 
pharmacokinetics from the 600 mg BID MTD showed a mean drug exposure, the daily area-under-
the-curve (AUC daily), of 10020 h.ng/ml with a mean Cmax of 835 ng/ml, and a median t1/2 of 5 
hours. When dosed at the MTD, ARRAY-380 levels were maintained at or above the predicted 
IC90 at steady state. A tablet formulation was developed for ONT-380 and the pharmacokinetics 
of the tablet formulation was compared to the PIC capsule formulation. The tablet resulted in lower 
inter-subject variability compared to the capsule. Food increased exposure of ONT-380/tucatinib 
from the tablet by approximately 50% after administration of the tablet in the fed state compared 
to fasted state. Absorption of tucatinib from the tablet was delayed when administered with food, 
but Cmax was not affected. The tablet formulation of tucatinib was subsequently used in the studies 
tucatinib-004 and tucatinib-005. PK results from these two studies indicated that the tablet 
formulation resulted in a nearly 2-fold increase in drug exposure at steady state when compared to 
the PIC formulation. At steady state and at the 300 mg BID dose, the mean Cmax of tucatinib was 
802 ng/ml, the mean time to Cmax was 2hrs, the mean half-life was 7 hrs, and the mean AUC daily 
was 10207 h.ng/ml, almost exactly the same as the value of the AUC daily obtained from the 600 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 44 of 115 
 
mg BID MTD of PIC formulation. The PKs of tucatinib tablets were consistent and proportional 
over the doses studied when given either as a single agent or in combination with other agents. 
There was no unusual drug-drug interactions observed between tucatinib and the combined drugs 
capecitabine 
and 
trastuzumab. 
PK 
analysis 
of 
capecitabine, 
TDM-1 
and 
their 
catabolites/metabolites showed plasma levels that were consistent with the published data.  
 
2.1.11 ONT-380 / tucatinib in the treatment of CNS metastases 
ONT-380-004 (tucatinib + TDM-1) and ONT-380-005 (tucatinib + capecitabine, 
trastuzumab or capecitabine and trastuzumab) studies have enrolled subjects with previously 
treated stable CNS metastases, untreated CNS metastases, or previously treated and progressive 
CNS metastases. Patients were considered evaluable for CNS response if they had CNS lesions 
that had never been treated, or lesions that had progressed after prior local therapy (either WBRT, 
SRS, or surgical resection). Patients were considered not evaluable for CNS response if they had 
CNS metastases which were previously treated with local therapy and were stable or decreased in 
size since local therapy. CNS response was evaluated using a modified RECIST 1.1 criteria, as 
well as considerations for neurological deterioration and steroid use. Seventeen subjects from these 
two studies had evaluable CNS lesions at baseline (tucatinib plus TDM-1 n=9; tucatinib plus 
capecitabine n=1; tucatinib plus trastuzumab n=4; and tucatinib plus capecitabine and trastuzumab 
n=3). Of these, 14 underwent at least one follow-up CNS assessment and were evaluable for CNS 
response. In these 14 subjects, best overall CNS response was 1 CNS complete response (CR) (T-
DM1 n=1), 4 CNS PR (TDM-1, n=2; capecitabine n=1, capecitabine plus trastuzumab n=1), and 
9 CNS SD (TDM-1, n=5; trastuzumab, n=3; capecitabine plus trastuzumab, n=1). Responses in 
the CNS were seen even in subjects treated previously with pertuzumab, TDM-1, and lapatinib. 
Of the three subjects who were non-evaluable for CNS response, 2 had systemic PD and no follow-
up CNS scan (TDM-1, n=1; capecitabine plus trastuzumab, n=1), and 1 subject treated with 
tucatinib and trastuzumab alone with an enlarging lesion was taken off study for surgical resection. 
Pathologic review of the resected specimen revealed no viable tumor and evidence for treatment-
induced necrosis. Four subjects (TDM-1, n=2; trastuzumab, n=1; capecitabine, n=1) were on 
treatment for > 6 months. In summary, tucatinib has demonstrated early signs of activity in CNS, 
resulting in radiographic tumor responses as well as prolonged stabilization of disease. 
 
2.2 
Palbociclib 
2.2.1 Mechanism of action 
Palbociclib is an inhibitor of CDK4/6 complex. CDK4 and CDK6 regulate cycle 
progression from G1 into S phase. Major proteins in the CDK4/6 pathway are CDK4, CDK6, 
their partner cyclin D1, and tumor suppressors P16 and retinoblastoma (Rb) protein. 
Approximately 15% of human breast cancers demonstrate amplification of the cyclin D1 
gene, CCND1, and the majority of human breast cancers show overexpression of this protein [63, 
64]. In regulation of cell cycle progression, cyclin D1 interacts closely with the Rb protein. In the 
hypo-phosphorylated state, Rb acts as a tumor suppressor and contributes to cell cycle regulation 
at the G1 to S checkpoint by causing G1 arrest and suppressing gene transcription that is required 
for entry into the S phase. In response to mitogenic signals, CDK4 and CDK6 form a complex 
with cyclin D1, which phosphorylates the Rb protein. Once phosphorylated, phospho-RB 
disassociates from the transcription factor E2F1, liberating E2F1 from its cytoplasm bound state 
and allowing it to enter the nucleus, where it promotes the transcription of target genes that are 
essential for transition from G1 to S phase [65]. Controlled phosphorylation and deactivation of 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 45 of 115 
 
the Rb protein by the CDK4/CDK6/cyclin D1 complex is essential for progression of the cell 
cycle from G1 to S phase, and for cellular proliferation [64]. Loss of function of phospho-Rb has 
been described in 20 to 35% of breast cancers [66]. 
Inhibition of cyclin D1 via inactivation or degradation leads to cell cycle exit and 
differentiation. Inactivation of cyclin D1 is triggered by an inhibitor protein P16 which bind to 
CDK4/CDK6/cyclin D1 complex and inactivates the whole complex [65]. P16 gene deletions 
and/or promoter hypermethylation are frequent in breast carcinomas [67, 68]. CDK4/6 and cyclin 
D1 receive upstream regulation via ER, MAP kinase, β-catenin and PI3K pathways. The MAP 
kinase ERK activates the downstream transcription factors Myc and AP-1, which, in turn, 
activate the transcription of the CDK4, CDK6 and cyclin D1 genes. Rho family GTPases and 
focal adhesion kinase activate cyclin D1 gene in response to integrins [69, 70]. Importantly, there 
is a cross-talk between estrogen receptor α (ERα) and cyclin D1 pathways in HR+ breast cancer: 
17β-estradiol bound to ERα induces cyclin D1 gene expression, while cyclin D1 directly binds 
to ERα and stimulates ligand-independent ER-signaling [71]. Unrestricted CDK4/6 pathway 
activity, typical of HR+ breast cancer, leads to growth advantage and uncontrolled cell 
proliferation. In vitro, palbociclib reduces proliferation of HR+ breast cancer cell lines by 
blocking progression of the cell from G1 into S phase of the cell cycle [14]. Treatment of HR+ 
breast cancer cell lines (regardless of the HER2 status) with the combination of palbociclib and 
antiestrogens leads to decreased Rb phosphorylation resulting in a reduced expression of E2F1 
transcription factor, involved in the cell cycle regulation and synthesis of DNA. This leads to cell 
cycle arrest and increased growth inhibition compared to treatment with each drug alone [72]. In 
vitro treatment of HR+ breast cancer cell lines with the combination of palbociclib and 
antiestrogens causes increased cell senescence sustained for several days following drug removal 
[72, 73]. In vivo studies using a patient-derived breast cancer xenograft model demonstrated that 
the combination of palbociclib and letrozole increased Rb phosphorylation, and suppressed 
CDK4/6 downstream signaling and tumor growth to a greater extend compared to palbociclib or 
letrozole alone [72].  
 
2.2.2 Pharmacokinetics: absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion 
Absorption: The mean Cmax of palbociclib is observed between 6 to 12 hours following 
oral administration. The mean absolute bioavailability of palbociclib after an oral 125 mg dose is 
46%. In the dosing range of 25 mg to 225 mg, the AUC and Cmax increase proportionally with the 
dose. Steady state is achieved within 8 days following repeated once daily dosing. Palbociclib 
absorption and exposure are very low in approximately 13% of the population under the fasted 
condition. Food intake increases the palbociclib exposure in this small subset of the population, 
but does not alter palbociclib exposure in the rest of the population to a clinically relevant extent. 
Therefore, food intake reduces the intersubject variability of palbociclib exposure, which supports 
administration of palbociclib with food.  
Distribution Binding of palbociclib to human plasma proteins in vitro is approximately 
85%, with no concentration dependence over the concentration range of 500 ng/mL to 5000 ng/ml. 
The geometric mean apparent volume of distribution is 2583 L (26% CV).  
 
Metabolism: Palbociclib undergoes hepatic metabolism via oxidation and sulfonation, 
with acylation and glucuronidation contributing as minor pathways. Palbociclib is the major 
circulating drug-derived entity in plasma (23%). The major circulating metabolite is a glucuronide 
conjugate of palbociclib, although it only represents 1.5% of the administered dose in the excreta. 
Palbociclib is extensively metabolized with unchanged drug accounting for 2.3% and 6.9% of 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 46 of 115 
 
excreted dose in feces and urine, respectively. In feces, the sulfamic acid conjugate of palbociclib 
is the major drug-related component, accounting for 26% of the administered dose. Palbociclib is 
primarily metabolized by sulfotransferase (SULT) enzyme SULT2A1 and CYP3A.  
Elimination: The geometric mean apparent oral clearance of palbociclib is 63.1 L/hr (29% 
CV), and the mean (± standard deviation) plasma elimination half-life is 29 (±5) hours in patients 
with advanced breast cancer. In 6 healthy male subjects given a single oral dose of palbociclib, a 
median of 91.6% of the total administered dose was excreted in 15 days; feces (74.1% of dose) 
was the major route of excretion, with 17.5% of the dose recovered in urine. The majority of the 
material was excreted as metabolites. 
Drug Interactions: Palbociclib is primarily metabolized by CYP3A, and it is a weak time-
dependent inhibitor of CYP3A following daily 125 mg dosing to a steady state. Administration of 
sensitive CYP3A4 substrate midazolam with multiple doses of palbociclib increased midazolam 
plasma exposure by 61% in healthy subjects, compared with administration of midazolam alone 
[28]. 
According 
to 
FDA 
drug 
interaction 
labeling 
(http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/DrugInteracti
onsLabeling/ucm093664.htm#table3-1), this is consistent with palbociclib being a weak CYP3A4 
inhibitor. Because of these properties, strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers should be avoided in 
combination with palbociclib, or the dose of palbociclib should be modified accordingly. Per FDA 
prescribing information, dose of palbociclib should be reduced to 75mg daily when combined with 
strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. The dose of sensitive CYP3A4 substrates with narrow therapeutic 
indices (listed in Appendix D) may need to be reduced when given concurrently with palbociclib. 
Palbociclib is not an inhibitor of CYP1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6, and is not an 
inducer of CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, and 3A4 at clinically relevant concentrations. Under fed conditions 
there is no clinically relevant effect of PPIs, H2-receptor antagonists, or local antacids on 
palbociclib exposure. There is no drug interaction between palbociclib and letrozole when the two 
drugs are co-administered. Palbociclib has a low potential to inhibit the activities of drug 
transporters P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, organic anion transporters 1 and 3, 
organic cation transporter 2, and organic anion transporting polypeptides 1B1 and 1B3 at clinically 
relevant concentrations. The recommended full dose of palbociclib is a 125 mg tablet taken orally 
once daily with food for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off treatment to comprise a 
complete cycle of 28 days.  
 
2.2.3 Summary of clinical studies 
Palbociclib is indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ metastatic 
breast cancer in combination with anti-hormonal therapy. Palbociclib received accelerated 
approval by FDA based on the results of PALOMA-1 randomized phase II clinical trial, where 
it showed marked improvement in median PFS in combination with letrozole versus letrozole 
alone (26.1 versus 7.5 months) as a front line therapy of metastatic breast cancer [20]. Palbociclib 
showed remarkable activity in the second line metastatic settings in combination with fulvestrant 
in PALOMA-3 clinical trial, resulting in more than doubling of median PFS (9.2 months 
palbociclib with fulvestrant vs 3.8 months placebo with fulvestrant; HR 0.42; P <0.001) [58]. 
In PALOMA-1 clinical trial [20], dose reduction of palbociclib due to an adverse reaction 
of any grade occurred in 36% of patients. Permanent discontinuation of treatment due to an 
adverse reaction occurred in 8% patients receiving palbociclib and letrozole, and in 3% of 
patients receiving letrozole. Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of palbociclib and 
letrozole included neutropenia (6%), asthenia (1%), and fatigue (1%).  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 47 of 115 
 
The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) of any grade reported in patients in the 
palbociclib plus letrozole arm were neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue, anemia, upper respiratory 
infection, nausea, stomatitis, alopecia, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, decreased appetite, vomiting, 
asthenia, peripheral neuropathy, and epistaxis. The most frequently reported serious adverse 
reactions in patients receiving palbociclib plus letrozole were pulmonary embolism (4%) and 
diarrhea (2%). Higher frequency of pulmonary embolism in this study was attributed to a time 
bias (significantly prolonged progression free survival in patients on palbociclib and letrozole 
comparing to single agent letrozole). Higher frequency of pulmonary embolism was not 
confirmed in other studies of palbociclib.  
One of the most common adverse events (AEs) on palbociclib is decreased neutrophil 
count. Grade 3 (57%) or 4 (5%) decreased neutrophil counts were reported in patients receiving 
palbociclib plus letrozole in the PALOMA-1 randomized clinical trial. Grade ≥3 neutropenia 
was managed by dose reductions and/or dose delay or temporary discontinuation; the rate of 
permanent discontinuation of palbociclib due to repeated episodes of neutropenia was 6%. 
Median time to the first episode of any grade neutropenia per laboratory data was 15 days (13-
117 days). Median duration of Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 7 days. Febrile neutropenia events 
have been reported following palbociclib administration, although no cases of febrile 
neutropenia have been observed in PALOMA-1 [20]. Recommended monitoring include 
complete blood count (CBC) prior to starting palbociclib, at the beginning of each cycle, on 
Day 15 of the first two cycles, and as clinically indicated. Infections have been reported at a 
higher rate in patients treated with palbociclib in PALOMA-1 trial. Grade 3 or 4 infections 
occurred in 5% of patients treated with palbociclib plus letrozole whereas no patients treated 
with letrozole alone experienced a Grade 3 or 4 infection [20]. Based on findings in animals 
and mechanism of action, palbociclib can cause fetal harm (pregnancy category – not 
currently assigned, likely X).  
 
2.3 
Letrozole 
Letrozole is a nonsteroidal competitive inhibitor of the aromatase enzyme system which 
binds to the heme group of aromatase, a cytochrome P450 enzyme which catalyzes conversion of 
androgens to estrogens (specifically, androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol). This 
leads to inhibition of the enzyme and a significant reduction in plasma estrogen (estrone, estradiol 
and estrone sulfate) levels. Letrozole is administered in the dose of 2.5mg PO daily, and following 
administration, it is rapidly and well absorbed. Its absorption is not affected by food. Letrozole has 
a volume of distribution of 1.9 L/kg. It weakly binds to plasma proteins. Letrozole is metabolized 
in the liver via CYP3A4 and 2A6 to an inactive carbinol metabolite. Letrozole is a minor substrate 
of CYP2A6 and CYP3A4. It is a strong inhibitor of CYP2A6, and a weak inhibitor of CYP2C19. 
It may decrease the metabolism of CYP2A6 substrates, coadministration with strong CYP2A6 
substrates (dexmedetomidine and ifosfamide) is not recommended. Letrozole may increase the 
serum concentration of methadone, the dose of methadone may need to be adjusted. Clinically, 
letrozole does not display any significant interaction with palbociclib or HER2-targeted agents. 
Letrozole half-life is about 2 days, and time to steady state in plasma is 2 to 6 weeks. It is 
excreted mostly (90%) in urine (6% as unchanged drug, 75% as glucuronide carbinol metabolite, 
9% as unidentified metabolites). Letrozole is FDA approved for treatment of breast cancer in 
postmenopausal women (adjuvant treatment of HR+ early breast cancer, extended adjuvant 
treatment of early breast cancer after 5 years of tamoxifen; treatment of advanced breast cancer 
with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy; first-line treatment of HR+ or HR-

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 48 of 115 
 
unknown, locally-advanced, or metastatic breast cancer). Letrozole is generally well tolerated. 
Frequent adverse reactions (noted in >10% of patients) include edema (7% to 18%), headache (4% 
to 20%), dizziness (3% to 14%), fatigue (8% to 13%), hypercholesterolemia (3% to 52%), hot 
flashes (6% to 50%), nausea (9% to 17%), weight gain (2% to 13%), constipation (2% to 11%), 
weakness (4% to 34%), arthralgia (8% to 25%), arthritis (7% to 25%), bone pain (5% to 22%), 
back pain (5% to 18%), decreased bone mineral density (5% to 15%), bone fracture (10% to 14%), 
dyspnea (6% to 18%), cough (6% to 13%), and night sweats (15%). Letrozole is contraindicated 
in pregnancy (category D). 
 
3 
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS 
3.1 
Phase Ib part 
3.1.1 Primary objective 
• To evaluate safety and tolerability of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and 
letrozole, and to confirm that current RP2D of tucatinib and FDA approved dosing of 
palbociclib remains the same in the triplet combination 
 
3.1.2 Secondary objectives 
• To perform an assessment of pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tucatinib and palbociclib  
• To assess preliminary efficacy of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and 
letrozole 
 
3.1.3 Primary endpoint 
• Safety and tolerability of combination therapy as evaluated by standard NCI CTCAE 
version 4.03 
 
3.1.4 Secondary endpoints 
• Tucatinib and palbociclib plasma concentrations measured during the first and second 
cycle of therapy 
• Assessment of progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time from allocation to the 
first documented disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 [26] (Appendix C), or death 
due to any cause, whichever occurs first 
• For subjects with brain metastases enrolled in the study, assessment of bi-compartmental 
PFS in the non-CNS and CNS compartments, defined as the time from allocation to the 
first documented disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 [26] and/or RANO-BM 
criteria [27] (Appendix C), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first 
• Assessment of tumor response – complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable 
disease (SD) of 6 months or longer in duration – by RECIST 1.1 (for subjects with CNS 
metastases by RECIST 1.1 and RANO-BM); overall response rate (ORR) defined as 
proportion of subjects who had CR or PR; clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as proportion 
of subjects with CR, PR and SD; duration of response (DOR) defined as the time from 
enrollment into clinical trial until objective tumor progression or death whichever occurs 
first. 
 
3.2 
Phase II part 
3.2.1 Primary objective 
• To assess efficacy of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and letrozole by PFS  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 49 of 115 
 
3.2.2 Secondary objectives 
• To evaluate efficacy of tucatinib used in combination with palbociclib and letrozole by 
ORR, CBR and DOR 
• To evaluate safety and tolerability of the combination therapy 
 
3.2.3 Primary endpoint 
• PFS, defined as the time from allocation to the first documented disease progression 
according to RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first 
• For subjects with brain metastatic disease enrolled in the study, assessment of bi-
compartmental PFS in the non-CNS and CNS compartments, defined as the time from 
allocation to the first documented disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 and/or 
RANO-BM criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first 
 
3.2.4 Secondary endpoints 
• Assessment of response – CR, PR, or SD of 6 month or longer in duration – according to 
RECIST 1.1 (for subjects with CNS disease by RECIST 1.1 and/or RANO-BM); 
assessment of ORR (CR and PR), CBR (CR, PR and SD), and DOR.  
• Incidence, nature and severity of all AEs that occur on or after C1D1 of therapy 
• Tucatinib and palbociclib plasma concentrations measured during the first and second 
cycle of therapy at late time points 
 
3.3 
Scientific endpoints / correlative studies for phase IB and phase II parts 
Exploratory assessment of potential biomarkers of resistance and response measured 
before treatment, after 1 treatment cycle, and at disease progression: 
• Assessment of selective markers by IHC in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) 
tumor blocks – such as cyclin E, CDK2, retinoblastoma protein (RB), p16, HER3, total 
AKT, phospho-AKT, and others as determined by results or advances in the field.  
• Changes in tumor RNA expression profiles obtained by mRNA Next Generation 
sequencing in fresh frozen biopsy samples 
• Transcript alterations as assessed by mRNA Next Generation sequencing in fresh frozen 
biopsy samples 
• Analysis of tumor specific mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by digital PCR, 
including activating mutations in estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and HER2 genes, and selected 
mutations revealed by mRNA sequencing, as well as analysis of other circulating markers 
associated with cancer prognosis or outcomes from treatment 
• Correlation between tumor PAM50 subtype and efficacy of therapy 
 
4 
STUDY DESIGN 
4.1 
Overview 
 
This is a multicenter, single arm, open-label, run-in phase Ib / roll-over phase II study of 
tucatinib in combination with letrozole and palbociclib in subjects with HR+/HER2+ locally 
advanced unresectable or metastatic breast cancer. The study will enroll post-menopausal women; 
premenopausal women are eligible if on treatment with, or agreeable to mandatory ovarian 
suppression. Notably, premenopausal women of childbearing potential (defined as pre-menopausal 
women who are not permanently sterile due to hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal 
ligation, or bilateral tubal occlusion) are required to have negative pregnancy tests prior to treatment. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 50 of 115 
 
Because of known embryo-toxicity of all three study medications, subjects on treatment will be advised 
not to become pregnant, and contraception will be required for all women of childbearing potential and 
their male partners.  
 
The phase Ib part of the study will determine safety and tolerability of the combination of 
tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole to confirm that current RP2D of tucatinib and FDA approved 
dosing of palbociclib remains the same in the triplet combination. The dose of letrozole will be 
constant through the study period. Once the safety of the combination is established, we will move 
to the phase II part of the study in the expansion cohort of subjects at RP2D for the purpose of 
assessing efficacy while further refining assessment of safety of the combination treatment. 
After signing informed consent, completing baseline assessments and meeting all 
eligibility criteria, the subjects may start treatment. Treatment will be administered in cycles of 28 
days each and consist of tucatinib 300 mg PO BID, palbociclib 125 mg PO daily for 21 days 
followed by 7 days off, and letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily – doses indicated for dose level 1 (DL1). 
Dose modifications of tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole will be allowed (as outlined in the 
section 6.3 of the protocol). Treatment will continue until unacceptable toxicity, disease 
progression, withdrawal of consent, or study closure. In the absence of clear evidence of clinical 
or radiographic progression, all efforts should be made to continue treatment until unequivocal 
evidence of radiologic or clinical progression occurs. 
Throughout the study, AEs, SAEs, laboratory values, vital signs, physical examination 
findings, and ECOG performance status (PS) will be obtained. Toxicity will be evaluated 
according to NCI-CTCAE, version 4.03. Serial blood samples to measure plasma concentrations 
of tucatinib and palbociclib will be collected at pre-specified time points as indicated in the Study 
Calendar table and as described in the section 7.2. The underlying disease status will be assessed 
by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1 and RANO-BM criteria (as described in 
Appendix C) using radiological evaluations. 
 
Fig. 2. Study schema 
A: General study schema  
 
 
 
 
 
 
                          Phase Ib 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                          Phase II 
 
 
Subjects 1-10 enrolled at dose level 1 (DL1) 
Interim safety analysis 
Dose confirmation with option for de-escalation to 
lower DL if toxicity or PK interactions determine need 
Subjects 11-20 enrolled at newly determined DL 
Final phase I safety analysis, determination of RP2Ds 
Enrollment and treatment of subjects 21-40 at RP2Ds 
Final safety and efficacy analysis 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 51 of 115 
 
 
B: Sequence of events for a subject on the study: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2 
Safety analysis of the combination therapy 
4.2.1 Dose limiting toxicities 
 
Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is a side effect attributed to a study drug or drug combination that is 
serious enough to meaningfully affect the safety of the study subject. Any drug toxicity listed 
below is a DLT: 
• 
Any death not clearly due to the underlying disease or extraneous causes 
• 
Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity 
• 
Symptomatic CHF 
• 
Liver toxicity meeting Hy's law 
• 
Grade 3 neutropenia with fever 
• 
Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding 
• 
Any grade 4 anemia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia 
All AEs of the specified grades should count as DLTs except those that are clearly and 
incontrovertibly due to disease progression or extraneous causes. Repeated episodes of grade 3 
neutropenia interfering with drug administration and necessitating dose reduction of study 
medications, or other serious toxicity that, in the opinion of investigator merits dose reduction of 
the study drugs or discontinuation of palbociclib or letrozole according to good clinical practice, 
will qualify for DLT.  
 
The following adverse events do not represent DLTs: 
• Alopecia of any grade 
• Grade 3 nausea/vomiting or diarrhea WITHOUT adequate use of antiemetic or anti-
diarrheals that improves with optimal medical management in <72hrs 
• Grade 3 fatigue lasting ≤ 7 days 
• Grade 3 rash WITHOUT optimal use of topical corticosteroids or anti-infectives that 
improves with medical management in <72 hrs 
• ≥ Grade 3 electrolyte abnormality that lasts < 72 hours that is not clinically complicated, 
and returns to Grade ≤1 spontaneously or after conventional medical interventions 
• ≥ Grade 3 amylase or lipase elevation that is not associated with symptoms or clinical 
manifestations of pancreatitis 
 
Enrollment 
Screening 
Tucatinib 300 mg PO BID* 
Letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily* 
Optional tumor biopsy    
Research blood sample 
Optional tumor biopsy    
Research blood sample 
Palbociclib 125 mg PO daily* 
Cycle 1 
Further 
cycles 
End of 
study 
Optional tumor biopsy 
Research blood sample   
*Doses shown for DL1 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 52 of 115 
 
In this study, proportion of patients experiencing DLTs will be analyzed during the first and second 
interim safety analyses. Attribution of the DLTs to specific study drug(s) will be performed as 
described in section 6.2. Proportion of patients that experienced DLTs prior to the first interim 
safety analysis will determine if the study meets pre-specified safety thresholds, and whether de-
escalation of the study drug doses to lower dose levels is needed. Analysis of DLTs experienced 
by all patients enrolled in phase I part of the study will determine the outcomes of the second 
interim safety analysis, and whether the combination of tucatinib, letrozole and palbociclib 
demonstrates adequate safety profile allowing to proceed to phase II.  
 
4.2.2 Safety analysis algorithm 
Incidence, nature and severity of all AEs that occur on therapy will be analyzed. As a signal 
of lack of safety and tolerability of combination therapy, we will look into proportion of subjects 
experiencing DLTs due to tucatinib and palbociclib. The known frequency of DLTs for palbociclib 
as standard of care therapy when administered in combination with letrozole in the current FDA 
approved setting is significantly higher than the rate of DLTs experienced with tucatinib to date. 
Therefore, the phase Ib part of the study will be structured to identify an overall clinically 
meaningful increase in the expected toxicity of palbociclib and/or tucatinib as follows: safety will 
be considered clinically meaningfully altered if 60% or greater proportion of subjects experience 
DLTs secondary to the toxicity of palbociclib, or 20% or greater proportion of subjects experience 
DLTs secondary to the toxicity of tucatinib, or 50% or greater proportion of subjects experience 
DLTs that can be potentially attributed to both drugs (Tables 3 and 4).  
 
Table 3. Baseline and expected toxicities of palbociclib and tucatinib 
 
Toxicity attributable  
to a drug 
Baseline rate of DLTs with 
single agent therapy 
Rate of DLTs triggering 
safety 
concern of combination therapy trial 
palbociclib 
45% [20] 
≥60% 
tucatinib 
10% [22] 
≥20% 
toxicity potentially 
attributable to both 
tucatinib and palbociclib 
 
≥50% 
 
Table 4. Safety boundaries for phase Ib part of the trial 
 
Drug 
Confidence level 
N* 
Rate 
Upper limit CI 
n** 
palbociclib 
0.9 
10 
0.6 
0.812 
8 out of 10 
20 
0.6 
0.751 
15 out of 20 
tucatinib 
0.9 
10 
0.2 
0.408 
4 out of 10 
20 
0.2 
0.347 
7 out of 20 
both drugs 
0.9 
10 
0.5 
0.760 
8 out of 10 
20 
0.5 
0.694 
14 out of 20 
*N – total number of subjects; **n – number of subjects experiencing DLTs due to palbociclib 
and/or tucatinib that is set as a safety boundary 
 
Table 5. Pre-planned dose levels (DLs) for subjects in phase Ib part of the study 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 53 of 115 
 
DLs 
Drug doses 
Subjects treated 
DL1 
tucatinib 300 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 1-10 treated at DL1 
DL -1 
tucatinib 300 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 100 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if palbociclib 
toxicity increased) 
DL -2 
tucatinib 250 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if tucatinib 
toxicity increased) 
DL -3 
tucatinib 250 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 100 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if palbociclib 
and tucatinib toxicity increased, 
or unattributable toxicity) 
DL -4 
tucatinib 250 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if PKs indicate 
a significant change to the 
metabolism of tucatinib)* 
DL -5 
tucatinib 200 mg PO BID 
palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 day on, 7 days off 
letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily 
Subjects 11-20 (if PKs indicate 
a significant change to the 
metabolism of tucatinib)* 
 *Significant PK changes regardless of noted clinical toxicities 
 
 
To determine the safety of the triple combination, we will plan to enroll 10 subjects at the 
baseline starting doses (DL1) of tucatinib 300 mg PO BID, palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 days 
on and 7 days off, and letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily on a 28 day cycle length (Table 5).  
 
After 10 subjects are accrued to the study and complete at least 1 cycle of treatment, we will 
perform an interim analysis of the safety phase Ib cohort. We anticipate that DLTs will likely be more 
attributable to palbociclib than tucatinib, but unbiased assessment of the toxicities will be performed. 
Based on the known rates of DLTs to date, as outlined above, the following rules will be applied: 
 
 
10 subjects enrolled, completed at least one cycle of treatment (28 days) and evaluable for 
safety analysis: 
 
 
If 7 or fewer subjects experienced DLTs of palbociclib, 3 or fewer subjects experienced 
DLTs of tucatinib, and 7 or fewer subjects experienced DLTs that are potentially attributable to 
both drugs, then the interim safety of the Phase Ib cohort will be considered acceptable and accrual 
will continue to enroll to 20 subjects without change of the starting doses. Otherwise, we will de-
escalate to the next dose levels. 
 
 
Scenario 1: Palbociclib toxicity increased 
If 8 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects experienced DLTs due to palbociclib, the palbociclib 
starting dose will be decreased to 100 mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off for the subsequent 10 
subjects in the safety run in phase Ib cohort. Tucatinib starting dose will not be changed (DL -1). 
 
 
Scenario 2: Tucatinib toxicity increased 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 54 of 115 
 
If 4 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects experienced DLTs due to tucatinib, we will proceed 
with a starting dose reduction of tucatinib to 250 mg PO BID and leave palbociclib starting dose 
unchanged (DL -2). 
 
 
Scenario 3: Toxicity potentially attributable to both tucatinib and palbociclib: 
If there is a lack of clarity or an apparent combination of DLTs that can be attributable to both 
tucatinib and palbociclib in 8 out of 10 or greater proportion of subjects, then a combined starting 
dose reduction of tucatinib to 250 mg PO daily and palbociclib to 100 mg PO daily 21 days on and 
7 days off will occur (DL -3). 
 
 
Incorporation of PKs in safety analysis: 
Both tucatinib and palbociclib PK data will be considered during the first interim safety analysis.  
Based on the information available prior to phase I of the study, we did not expect significant 
changes in palbociclib PKs. With palbociclib being a weak time dependent CYP3A4 inhibitor, 
there was a possibility the tucatinib PKs will be changed. Therefore, the dose levels were designed 
accordingly: if PKs are suggesting a significant change to the metabolism of tucatinib, adjusting 
to the lower dose levels (DL -4 and DL -5) regardless of noted clinical toxicities was planned. 
 
 
Based on the existing data for these drugs and the non-overlapping toxicity profiles, it is 
not anticipated that greater than one dose reduction of either tucatinib, or palbociclib, or both drugs 
will need to occur to determine the safe combination of drugs to move forward into phase II. If 
accrual to subjects 11-20 of the phase Ib cohort demonstrates a level of DLTs equal or above the 
threshold of 15/20 subjects for palbociclib attributable events, 7/20 subjects with tucatinib 
attributable events, or 14/20 subjects where DLTs are potentially attributable to both drugs (Table 
4), or if PKs for subjects 11-20 are suggestive of clinically significant changes in the drug 
metabolism, then consideration of additional drug specific dose reductions will occur. It could 
potentially trigger enrollment of additional 10 subjects in the phase Ib safety cohort, or stopping 
clinical trial for the safety reasons, which will be determined, if this unlikely event should occur, 
by the by the Lead PI with the input from the study research team, the sponsor, Pfizer Inc., Seattle 
Genetics, Inc., and/or the protocol Data Safety Monitoring Committee. 
 
Letrozole dose will be kept constant for all study subjects. Worsening of estrogen 
withdrawal symptoms are not anticipated to be increased through the drug combinations nor 
meaningfully effect the safety assessment of the protocol, as the timing of onset of many AI-based 
symptoms occurs months to years into the treatment. However, if a subject develops known AI 
dependent AEs of grade ≥3 meeting criteria for DLT, which we expect will occur at a frequency 
of 4-6% [20], the subject may choose to discontinue AI therapy. Subjects who discontinue 
letrozole may opt to remain on protocol if they continue taking both tucatinib and palbociclib, and 
if it is felt to be in their best clinical interest. 
 
Attribution of DLTs to a specific study drug (tucatinib, palbociclib or letrozole) is 
described in detail in the section 6.2. A DLT experienced by a study subject will always necessitate 
dose modification and/or interruption of therapy with the study drug(s) for this subject. Dose 
modifications of the study drugs are described in section 6.3 of the protocol.  
 
The study has completed the final phase Ib safety analysis on January 31,2019. Based on 
the data from the final phase Ib safety analysis, it has been determined that the study did not cross 
safety thresholds, and full doses of tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole are reasonably well 
tolerated. Therefore,  the recommended phase II doses (RP2D) were declared as tucatinib 300 mg 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 55 of 115 
 
PO BID; palbociclib 125 mg PO daily 21 days on followed by 7 days off; and letrozole 2.5 mg PO 
daily (DL1).  
 
However, after the study was re-opened for phase II on January 31,t 2019, new information 
on tucatinib became available via Safety Letter from Seattle Genetics sent to investigators on 
February 13 2019 (“Re: Safety Communication: Potential Risk of Drug-Drug Interaction”). This 
letter was to inform the investigators about potential drug-drug interaction between tucatinib and 
sensitive CYP3A4 substrates (such as palbociclib) based on the results of drug-drug interaction 
study ONT-380-012. This study demonstrated that in healthy volunteers tucatinib increased the 
geometric mean of midazolam exposure (AUC) 5.85-fold (90% CI 5.14 – 6.66); therefore, 
tucatinib belongs to the class of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. According to the FDA prescribing 
information, the dose of palbociclib, which is a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, needs to be decreased 
to 75mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off when palbociclib is used with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. 
These findings were discussed with both Pfizer and Seattle Genetics, decision was made to change 
the dose of palbociclib to 75mg daily for all patients who were on study, and for all newly enrolled 
patients (as discussed in the Letter to the Investigators from the lead study PI Dr. Shagisultanova 
dated February 15 2019). Therefore, starting from February 15 2019, all new patients are enrolled 
in phase II part of the study at the following drug doses: tucatinib 300 mg PO BID; palbociclib 75 
mg PO daily 21 days on followed by 7 days off; and letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily. For all patients 
who were on study prior to February 15 2019, the dose of palbociclib was changed to 75mg PO 
daily 21 days on followed by 7 days off (regardless of clinical toxicities), while the doses of 
tucatinib and letrozole were not changed. Additional PK analysis for palbociclib and tucatinib was 
planned to assure safety of the participants.   
 
4.3 
Efficacy analysis of the combination therapy 
 
During the study, subjects will undergo standard radiologic imaging for complete 
assessment of disease to include chest, abdomen and pelvis, as well as bone assessment and 
appropriate imaging of any other known sites of disease. Recommended imaging includes a 
diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan. Restaging brain MRI with contrast is required for 
subjects with brain metastases enrolled in the study. Imaging studies will be repeated every 8 
weeks for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks thereafter, irrespective of dose holdings or 
interruptions. The primary efficacy endpoint for the phase II part of the study is PFS, or, for 
subjects with CNS disease enrolled into the study, bi-compartmental PFS (in the CNS and non-
CNS compartments) defined as the time from allocation to the first documented disease 
progression according to RECIST 1.1 and/or RANO-BM criteria (Appendix C), or death due to 
any cause, whichever occurs first. If a subject does not have a documented date of progression or 
death, PFS will be censored at the date of the last adequate assessment. Subjects from both phase 
Ib and phase II part of the study will be included into a final efficacy analysis. 
 
In this trial, if a subject is found to have progressive disease solely due to CNS progression 
per RANO-BM criteria and has a response to therapy outside of the CNS, the subject may stay on 
study provided this subject undergoes local therapy (radiotherapy or surgery) to the progressive 
CNS lesion(s). The subject may continue on study until a second progressive disease event occurs 
(either CNS or non-CNS). Such cases should be discussed with and receive approval from the 
Lead study PI at the time when initial CNS progression is documented. 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 56 of 115 
 
4.4 
Number of subjects  
 
It is anticipated that 20 evaluable subjects in the phase Ib part and 20 subjects in the phase 
II part will be enrolled into this study. The phase II part of the study is designed to detect a 50% 
improvement in PFS comparing to historical control. TH3resa study (TDM-1 versus physician’s 
choice therapy) enrolled similar patient population [33, 34] and represent appropriate study for 
comparison. TH3resa showed median PFS of 6.2 months in TDM-1 arm. Using the survival 
analysis and assuming that the survival time is exponentially distributed, accrual time is 12 months, 
follow-up time is 18 months, and drop out / loss of follow up rate is 5%, the sample size of 40 
patients total (20 patients enrolled in phase Ib part, and 20 patients enrolled in phase II part) will 
allow us to achieve a statistical power of 82% with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.1 to detect 
50% improvement in median PFS (from 6.2 month in the historical control [33, 34] to 9.3 months 
in the current study). Subjects who terminate participation for any reason before completing Cycle 
1 are not considered evaluable and may be replaced within a timeframe of the study  
 
4.5 
Study timeline 
• Phase Ib part accrual – 6 month 
• Phase II part accrual – 6 month 
• Total projected accrual time – 1 year 
• Phase Ib primary end-point reporting – 8 month 
• Phase II primary end-point reporting – 2.5 years 
• Anticipated completion of the study – 2.5 years 
 
 
This multicenter clinical trial will be conducted through the Academic Breast Cancer 
Consortium (ABRCC), with the University of Colorado Cancer Center as the lead site. A Protocol 
Contact Form will be maintained for the study and include a listing of all participating sites and 
key personnel. 
 
5 
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 
This clinical trial can fulfill its objectives only if appropriate subjects are enrolled. The 
following eligibility criteria are designed to select subjects for whom protocol treatment is 
considered appropriate. All relevant medical and non-medical conditions should be taken into 
consideration when deciding whether this protocol is suitable for a particular subject. 
 
5.1 
Inclusion criteria 
1. Subjects must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of HR+/HER2+ locally advanced 
unresectable or metastatic breast cancer. Estrogen or progesterone receptor positivity is defined 
by IHC according to the most recent ASCO/CAP guidelines [29]. HER2 positivity is defined 
by standard of care fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or 3+ staining by IHC 
according to the most recent ASCO/CAP guidelines [30].  
2. Measurable and/or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1 criteria and/or RANO-BM criteria 
(Appendix C). Bone only disease is allowed.  
3. CNS inclusion criteria:  
• Subjects without CNS metastases are eligible. Note: brain imaging is not required for 
asymptomatic subjects without known brain metastatic disease prior to enrollment into the 
study 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 57 of 115 
 
• Subjects with untreated asymptomatic CNS metastases not needing immediate local 
therapy in the opinion of investigator are eligible. For subjects with untreated 
asymptomatic CNS lesions > 2.0 cm by contrast-enhanced MRI, discussion with and 
approval from the Lead PI is required prior to enrollment 
• Subjects with stable brain metastases previously treated with radiation therapy or surgery 
are allowed to enroll, provided that they are off corticosteroids or on stable/tapering dose 
of corticosteroids and stability of CNS metastatic disease for at least 4 weeks has been 
demonstrated, with the last MRI taken within 2 weeks prior to cycle 1 day 1 of the study. 
Relevant records of any CNS treatment must be available to allow for classification of 
target and non-target lesions 
4. Age ≥ 18 years 
5. ECOG performance status 0-1 
6. Life expectancy of more than 6 months, in the opinion of the investigator 
7. Study subjects should be post-menopausal women; premenopausal women are eligible if on 
ovarian suppression, or agreeable to mandatory ovarian suppression. Women of childbearing 
potential, defined as premenopausal women who are not permanently sterile (i.e., due to 
hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral tubal occlusion) are 
required to have negative pregnancy tests prior to initiation of treatment.  
8. Prior treatments:  
• Subjects should have received at least two approved HER2-targeted agents (trastuzumab, 
pertuzumab, or TDM-1) in the course of their disease 
• Subjects should have had at least 1 line of prior HER2-targeted therapy in the metastatic 
setting, with the exception of asymptomatic subjects with oligometastatic or bone / soft 
tissue only disease who, on investigator opinion, are appropriate for a single agent anti-
endocrine therapy per NCCN guidelines 
• Subjects who have had up to 2 lines of prior endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting are 
allowed. Prior adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant endocrine regimens are allowed and not 
counted towards this limit  
9. Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below: 
• Absolute neutrophil count  ≥ 1,500/mm3  
• Platelets ≥ 75,000/mm3  
• Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 mg/dL without red blood cell transfusion ≤ 7 days prior to Cycle 1 
Day 1 of therapy 
• Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN) except for subjects with known 
Gilbert’s disease, who may enroll if the conjugated bilirubin is ≤ 1.5 ULN 
• AST (SGOT)/ALT (SGPT) ≤2.5 X ULN;  
• Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL 
• International normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≤ 
1.5 X ULN unless on medication known to alter INR and aPTT 
• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% (as assessed by ECHO or MUGA) 
documented within 4 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment 
• Serum or urine pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential) negative ≤ 7 days 
of starting treatment  
10. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent and comply 
with the study scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests and other procedures. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 58 of 115 
 
11. Subject or legally authorized representative of a subject must provide signed informed consent 
per a consent document that has been approved by an institutional review board or independent 
ethics committee (IRB/IEC) prior to initiation of any study-related tests or procedures that are 
not part of standard-of-care for the subject’s disease. 
 
5.2 
Exclusion criteria 
1. Subjects with previously treated progressing brain metastases are excluded from the study 
2. Subjects with known brain metastases and contraindications to undergo contrast MRI imaging 
of the brain are excluded from the study 
3. Pregnancy or breast feeding 
4. Current active treatment with an investigational agent 
5. Known history of hypersensitivity to aromatase-inhibitor drugs 
6. Any toxicity related to prior cancer therapies that has not resolved to ≤ Grade 1, with the 
exception of peripheral neuropathy, which must have resolved to ≤ Grade 2, and alopecia 
7. Previous treatment with lapatinib, neratinib, afatinib, tucatinib, or other investigational EGFR-
family receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor or HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor.  
8. Previous treatment with palbociclib, abemaciclib, ribociclib or other investigational CDK4/6 
inhibitors 
9. Any systemic anti-cancer therapy (including hormonal therapy), radiation, or experimental 
agent ≤ 2 weeks of first dose of study treatment 
10. Active bacterial, fungal or viral infections requiring treatment with IV antibiotic, IV anti-
fungal, or IV anti-viral drugs 
11. Known active hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 
infections. Note: pretesting is not required. 
12. Inability to swallow pills or any significant gastrointestinal disease which would preclude the 
adequate oral absorption of medications  
13. Use of prohibited medications listed in Appendix D within 3 elimination half-lives of the 
inducer or inhibitor prior to first dose of the study treatment 
14. Known myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, percutaneous transluminal coronary 
angioplasty/stenting (PTCA), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) within 6 month of the 
first dose of the study treatment 
15. Clinically significant cardio-vascular disease, such as ventricular arrhythmia requiring therapy, 
uncontrolled hypertension (defined as persistent systolic blood pressure > 160 mm Hg and/or 
diastolic blood pressure > 100 mm Hg on antihypertensive medications), or any history of 
symptomatic CHF 
16. Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric conditions or laboratory abnormalities 
that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or 
may interfere with the interpretation of study results, or in the judgment of the investigator 
would make the subject inappropriate for entry into the study. 
 
6 
STUDY TREATMENTS 
6.1 
Drug Supply 
6.1.1 Tucatinib formulation, packaging and storage 
Tucatinib is manufactured as tablets 150mg and 50mg. It is available as both a coated 
yellow oval-shaped tablet in a 150 mg dosage strength and a coated yellow round convex tablet in 
a 50 mg dosage strength for PO administration. The tablets are manufactured from a drug product 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 59 of 115 
 
intermediate amorphous dispersion of tucatinib in polyvinylpyrrolidine-vinyl acetate copolymer 
(PVP-VA), which is then combined with standard pharmaceutical excipients and compressed into 
tablets. The tablets are packaged in round, high-density polyethylene bottles containing a 
desiccant, with an induction sealed liner and child-resistant plastic closure cap.  
Tucatinib is stored under refrigeration (2 to 8°C) and should be handled with care. Stability 
studies to support the drug storage conditions have been conducted. The shelf life / expiration date 
of each lot of the drug and appropriate storage conditions will be closely monitored. 
 
Tucatinib will be supplied by Seattle Genetics, Inc.  
 
 
6.1.2 Palbociclib formulation, packaging and storage 
Palbociclib is manufactured in tablets of 125 mg, 100 mg, and 75 mg. Palbociclib is 
supplied in the following strength and package configurations (Table 6): 
 
Table 6. Palbociclib formulations 
 
Package 
Configuration  
Tablet Strength 
(mg)  
NDC  
Tablet Description  
Blister packs of 21 
tablets 
125  
NDC 0069-0189-21  
Smooth-coated tablet sored in a 
white and green box stamped with 
the word “IBRANCE”. 
Blister packs of 21 
tablets 
100  
NDC 0069-0188-21  
Smooth-coated tablet, stored in a 
white and purple box stamped with 
the word “IBRANCE”. 
Blister packs of 21 
tablets 
75  
NDC 0069-0187-21  
Smooth-coated tablet, stored in a 
white and blue box stamped with the 
word “IBRANCE”.  
Palbociclib should be store at 20ºC to 25ºC (68ºF to 77ºF); excursions permitted between 
15ºC to 30ºC (59ºF to 86ºF). 
Palbociclib will be supplied by Pfizer Inc. 
 
6.1.3 Letrozole formulation, packaging and storage 
Letrozole is manufactured as 2.5 mg tablets. Letrozole tablets are dark yellow, film-coated, 
round, slightly biconvex, with beveled edges, imprinted with the letters FV on one side and CG on 
the other side. Letrozole is packaged in HDPE bottles with a safety screw cap containing 30 tablets 
(NDC 0078-0249-15). Letrozole should be store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C 
(59-86°F). 
 
Letrozole will be obtained commercially per standard of care. 
 
6.1.4 Drug accountability 
Upon receipt at the investigative site, palbociclib and tucatinib should be stored according 
to the manufacturer instructions in the original packaging. Tucatinib should be stored under 
refrigeration at 2 to 8°C. Palbociclib showed be stored at 20 and 25°C (excursions permitted 
between 15 and 30°C). The drugs should be protected from excessive humidity in a monitored, 
locked, secure area with limited access. Storage area temperature conditions must be monitored 
and recorded daily. All temperature excursions will be reported to the sponsor for assessment and 
authorization for continued use. Study site staff must instruct subjects on how to store and 
administer oral medications that will be dispensed for at-home administration. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 60 of 115 
 
Accountability for study drug product is the responsibility of the investigator. The study 
site must maintain accurate records demonstrating dates and amount of study treatment received, 
to whom it was dispensed (subject-by-subject accounting), and accounts for any palbociclib and 
tucatinib accidentally or deliberately destroyed. A written explanation must be provided for any 
discrepancies. Subjects are to be instructed on proper accountability of the take-home study drugs 
and will be instructed to return any unused drug in the original packaging at the appropriate clinic 
visits. The investigator must return all unused drug products provided by Pfizer Inc. and Seattle 
Genetics, Inc. 
 
6.1.5 Administration 
Tucatinib should be taken orally twice a day approximately at the same time. Palbociclib 
should be taken orally once daily for 21 consecutive days at approximately same time of the day, 
followed by 7 days off treatment to comprise a complete cycle of 28 days. Palbociclib can be taken 
with proton pump inhibitors (PPI)/antacids and does not contain lactose or gelatin. Palbociclib 
tablets should be swallowed whole (participants should not chew, crush or open them prior to 
swallowing). Letrozole should be taken once daily in the dose of 2.5 mg approximately at the same 
time of the day.  
All three medications may be taken with or without food (without regards to meals), 
because food does not influence absorption of the tablets of tucatinib, palbociclib or letrozole. 
However, to prevent stomach discomfort that sometimes may be caused by taking medications in 
the tablet form, for this study the Investigator recommends taking all study medications with food.  
Subjects will be instructed by the study team designate of the Investigator as to the specific 
dose of tucatinib and palbociclib in accordance with the appropriate DL. Complete dosing instructions 
will be provided to study subjects, and will include the minimum times between doses, dosing 
relation to meals, and instructions for missed doses. Subjects will receive study treatments on 28 day 
cycles until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study closure. 
 
6.1.6 Compliance 
Compliance for this study is defined as taking ≥ 80% of the intended dose in any given 
cycle (28 day period).  Any dose delay within the 28 day-period represents compliance days 
missed. The achieved dose intensity is irrespective of sequential or intermittent missed dosing. 
Compliance will be assessed on a subject-by-subject basis. The pharmacist or designee will record 
the number of palbociclib tablets and tucatinib tablets dispensed to each individual subject, and 
the number of palbociclib tablets and tucatinib tablets returned to the clinic at the end of each 
cycle. Data regarding the administration of letrozole will also be collected by the site after each 
cycle. Dose modifications and interruptions of any study drug will be documented in the source 
documents and the case report forms (CRFs).  
 
6.2 
Attribution of toxicities 
Palbociclib, tucatinib and letrozole have largely non-overlapping toxicity profiles. 
Therefore, dose modifications or discontinuation of the study drugs will be performed taking into 
account specific toxicities of these agents. If a subject on the study develops specific toxicity 
attributable to one of the study drugs, only the dose of this particular drug will be modified (as 
described further in the section 6.3). Subjects are allowed to stay on the study if either palbociclib 
or letrozole are discontinued for toxicity. If both palbociclib and letrozole are stopped for toxicity, 
a subject will be removed from the study. If tucatinib is discontinued for toxicity, a subject will be 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 61 of 115 
 
removed from the study. Tables 7, 8 and 9 summarize common, less common and rare side effects 
of tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole (presented in the alphabetical order). 
 
Table 7. Toxicity profile of tucatinib 
 
Common side effects (>20%) Less common side effects (1-20%) 
Rare side effects (<1%) 
Diarrhea 
Dizziness 
Fatigue 
Nausea 
Rash 
Weakness 
 
 
Abdominal pain  
Alkaline phosphatase elevation  
ALT and AST elevation* 
Anemia 
Back pain 
Bilirubin elevation 
Constipation 
Cough 
Creatinine increase 
Decreased appetite 
Electrolyte abnormalities 
Headache 
Hypokalemia 
Hypomagnesemia 
Hyponatremia 
HypophosphatemiaMusculoskeletal 
chest pain 
Myalgia 
Night sweats 
Pain in limbs 
Peripheral edema 
Shortness of breath 
Vomiting 
Upper respiratory infections 
Urinary tract infections 
Decreased LVEF 
Dehydration 
Symptomatic CHF** 
EKG changes/QT 
prolongation 
Arrhythmias  
 
* Cases of grade 4 (potentially life threatening) ALT and AST elevation with tucatinib treatment 
has been reported; ** Symptomatic CHF manifests as clinical symptoms of fluid retention, 
tachycardia, and shortness of breath in the settings of elevated BNP and / or ECHO findings 
diagnostic of CHF 
 
Table 8. Toxicity profile of palbociclib 
 
More Common 
toxicities (>30%) 
Common toxicities  
(10-30%) 
Less common toxicities 
(5-10%) 
Rare toxicities  
(<5%) 
Fatigue 
Infections* 
Leukopenia 
Lymphopenia 
Neutropenia 
 
 
Anemia 
Arthralgia 
Back pain 
Common Cold 
Constipation 
Cough 
Diarrhea 
Abdominal pain 
Abnormal liver tests 
Anxiety 
Asthenia (weakness) 
Chest pain  
Depression 
Dry mouth 
Blurred vision 
Dry eyes or watery 
eyes 
Interstitial lung 
disease (pneumonitis) 
Febrile neutropenia 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 62 of 115 
 
 
 
Dizziness 
Decreased appetite 
Dyspnea (shortness 
of breath) 
Insomnia 
Fever 
Headache 
Hair loss 
Hot flash 
Mucositis / stomatitis 
Nausea 
Pain in the limbs  
Thrombocytopenia 
Vomiting 
Rash 
Dry skin 
Dysgeusia (taste 
changes) 
Epistaxis 
Increased creatinine  
Indigestion  
Falls 
Flu-like symptoms  
Heartburn 
Hypertension  
Mouth ulcers 
Myalgia 
Muscle cramps 
Pain 
Peripheral edema 
Pruritus 
 
 
 
*Infections include serious bacterial or viral infections, or reactivation of latent infections. A 
case of mycobacterial infection (tuberculosis) was reported on treatment with palbociclib.  
 
Table 9. Toxicity profile of letrozole 
 
Common toxicities (>20%) 
Less common toxicities (1-20%) 
Rare toxicities (<1%) 
Arthralgias 
Hot flashes 
Mood swings 
Myalgias 
Vaginal dryness 
Dizziness 
Fatigue 
Headache 
Hypertension 
Insomnia 
Increased blood glucose 
Increased cholesterol 
Nausea 
Night sweats 
Osteoporotic bone fractures 
Urinary tract infections 
Vaginal bleeding 
Vomiting 
Weight gain 
Worsening bone mineral density 
Constipation 
 
 
 
Attribution of toxicities will be done per investigator opinion, and in consultation with the 
Lead PI in case of SAEs. Table 10 can be used as a guidance for attribution of toxicities, however, 
investigators are encouraged to use their best clinical judgement. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 63 of 115 
 
Table 10. Suggested attribution of toxicities to study drugs 
 
Toxicities very likely attributable to 
tucatinib 
palbociclib 
letrozole 
ALT and AST 
elevationa 
Alk Phos elevation 
Elevation of bilirubin 
Decreased LVEF 
Symptomatic CHF 
 
Anemia 
Bacterial or fungal infections (in the 
settings of grade ≥3 neutropenia) 
Dry eyes or watery eyes 
Dysgeusia  
Epistaxis 
Hair loss 
Leukopenia 
Lymphopenia 
Mucositis / stomatitis 
Neutropenia 
Neutropenic fever 
Thrombocytopenia 
Arthralgias 
Hot flashes 
Mood swings 
Myalgias 
Night sweats 
Osteoporotic bone fractures 
UTIs (in the settings of 
vaginal dryness) 
Vaginal dryness 
Worsening bone density 
Toxicities potentially attributable to both tucatinib and palbociclib 
Anemia 
Anorexia 
Constipation 
Diarrhea 
Dizziness 
Electrolyte abnormalities 
Fatigue 
Headaches 
Myalgias 
Nausea 
Pain in the limbs 
Peripheral edema 
Pruritus 
Rash 
Vomiting 
Weakness 
Upper respiratory tract infections 
a Although LFT elevation is much more likely to be attributed to tucatinib, palbociclib may 
contribute. Therefore, in all cases of bilirubin or ALT / AST elevation of ≥G3, both tucatinib 
and palbociclib should be put on hold, and lead PI should be consulted regarding the 
attribution of toxicity. 
 
In cases of grade ≥3 toxicities potentially attributed to both tucatinib and palbociclib, doses 
of both tucatinib and palbociclib will be decreased (as described in the section 6.3.3). Alopecia, 
grade 3 fatigue lasting ≤7 days, grade ≥3 electrolyte abnormalities returning to grade ≤1 within 72 
hours spontaneously or with optimal medical management, grade 3 rash in the absence of adequate 
management with anti-infectives and / or topical corticosteroids that improves with optimal 
medical management in <72hrs, grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea in the absence of optimal 
use of anti-emetic or antidiarrheal medications that improves with optimal medical management 
in < 72hrs, and grade ≥3 amylase or lipase elevation that is not associated with symptoms or 
clinical manifestations of pancreatitis do not require dose modifications of the study drugs. 
 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 64 of 115 
 
6.3 
Dose modifications of the study drugs 
6.3.1 Dose modification of tucatinib 
Tucatinib will be administered at 300 mg PO BID, which is the current MTD/RP2D when 
given in combination with trastuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, or capecitabine. Any grade 3 
toxicity clearly related to tucatinib (such as elevation of ALT, AST, and/or bilirubin) will result in 
the drug being held until the toxicity returns to grade ≤1. Tucatinib-related toxicity must resolve 
to grade ≤1 within 3 weeks for the subject to remain on study. Then, subject may resume therapy 
at 250 mg PO BID. A second and third dose hold for toxicity may occur with the timeline of 3 
weeks for symptom recovery to grade ≤1, then the drug may be resumed at 200 mg and 150 mg 
BID, respectively. If a fourth episode of grade 3 tucatinib related toxicity occurs, drug should be 
held and subject removed from study. Once the dose of tucatinib is de-escalated for an individua l 
subject, it will not be increased for that subject during later cycles. At any time if grade 3 toxicity 
is not resolved to grade ≤1 within 3 weeks, subject will be removed from study. 
Any significant asymptomatic decline in LVEF requires additional assessment, holding of 
tucatinib, and management as outlined in Table 13. All subjects with an asymptomatic decline in 
EF to below 50% should be considered for medical management of LVEF decline associated with 
HER2-targeted therapy per standard guidelines. All incidence of symptomatic CHF will result in 
immediate discontinuation of tucatinib and the subject will be removed from study. All subject 
with symptomatic CHF should be followed until resolution of the event, even once removed from 
study. 
 
Table 11. Dose modifications of tucatinib 
 
Dose Modification for AEs  
Dose  
Recommended starting dose  
300mg PO BID  
First dose reduction  
250 mg PO BID  
Second dose reduction  
200 mg PO BID  
Third dose reduction 
150mg PO BID 
 
 
Dose reductions of greater increments than those listed in this table (i.e. more than 50 mg 
per dose reduction) may be made if considered clinically appropriate by the investigator. However, 
tucatinib dose may not be reduced below 150 mg BID. Additionally, for the starting dose levels 
lower than 300mg PO BID, the same dose modification tiers above will be followed, with the 
lowest dose allotted being 150mg PO BID. 
 
Table 12. Dose modifications of tucatinib for liver function abnormalities [see also section 
8.1.4 for details on events of special interest – drug-induced liver injury] 
 
Liver function abnormalities 
Action for tucatinib  
Grade 2 elevation of ALT and/or AST (> 3 – 
≤ 5 x ULN) 
Dose modification not required 
Grade 3 elevation of ALT and/or AST (> 5–
20 x ULN)a 
Hold until severity ≤ Grade 1. Restart at the 
next lower dose level 
Grade 4 elevation of ALT and/or AST (> 20 x 
ULN)  
Discontinue drug 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 65 of 115 
 
Elevation of ALT and/or AST (> 3 x ULN) 
AND Bilirubin (> 2 x ULN) 
[See section 8.1.4 on events of special 
interest – drug-induced liver injury] 
Discontinue drug 
Grade 2 elevation of bilirubin (> 1.5–3 x 
ULN) AND both ALT and AST (< 3 x ULN) 
Hold until severity ≤ Grade 1. Restart at same 
dose level 
Grade 3 elevation of bilirubin (> 3 – ≤ 10 x 
ULN) AND both ALT and AST (<3 x ULN) a 
Hold until severity ≤ Grade 1. Restart at the 
next lower dose level 
Grade 4 elevation of bilirubin (> 10 x ULN) 
Discontinue drug 
a Although LFT elevation is much more likely to be attributed to tucatinib, palbociclib may 
contribute. Therefore, in all cases of bilirubin or ALT / AST elevation of ≥G3, both tucatinib 
and palbociclib should be put on hold, and lead PI should be consulted regarding the 
attribution 
of 
toxicity. 
Abbreviations: 
alanine 
aminotransferase 
(ALT); 
aspartate 
aminotransferase (AST); upper limit of normal (ULN). 
 
Table 13. Dose modifications of tucatinib for left ventricular dysfunction 
 
LVEF / CHF 
Tucatinib dose modification 
LVEF ≥ 50% 
Continue treatment with tucatinib. 
LVEF 40% to <50% and decrease is ≤ 
15% absolute decrease from 
pretreatment baseline  
Continue treatment with tucatinib. Repeat LVEF 
assessment within 3 weeks. If LVEF has worsened, 
or not recovered to ≥ 50% or within 15% of absolute 
change from baseline, hold tucatinib and repeat 
LVEF assessment within 3 weeks. Consider medical 
management as per HER2 target therapy standard 
guidelines.  
LVEF 40% to <50% and ≥16% absolute 
decrease from pretreatment baseline 
Do not administer tucatinib. Repeat LVEF 
assessment within 3 weeks. Consider standard 
medical management of HER2 therapy-induced 
LVEF decline. If the LVEF has not recovered to 
≤15% absolute change from baseline, discontinue 
tucatinib and remove subject from the study.  
LVEF < 40% 
Do not administer tucatinib. Repeat LVEF 
assessment within 3 weeks and consider standard 
medical management of HER2 therapy-induced 
LVEF decline.  If LVEF < 40% is confirmed, 
discontinue tucatinib and remove from study. If 
LVEF is improved to ≥40%, continue to follow the 
algorithm in this table.  
Symptomatic CHF* 
Discontinue tucatinib 
Abbreviations: Congestive Heart Failure (CHF); Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF).  
*Symptomatic CHF manifests as clinical symptoms of fluid retention, tachycardia, and shortness 
of breath in the settings of elevated BNP and / or ECHO findings diagnostic of CHF 
 
6.3.2 Dose modifications of palbociclib  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 66 of 115 
 
 
Since new information became available about potential drug-drug interaction between 
tucatinib and palbociclib, different dose modifications were used prior to February 15, 2019, and 
after February 15, 2019.  
 
Dose modifications of palbociclib prior to February 15 2019 (prior to availability of 
safety information on potential tucatinib – palbociclib interaction) 
 
Palbociclib will be initiated at the FDA approved dose of 125 mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 
days off. Dose interruption and modifications for known palbociclib-related AEs (including bone 
marrow suppression, neutropenic fever, bacterial or fungal infections in the settings grade ≥3 
neutropenia, mucositis / stomatitis) should occur per palbociclib full prescribing information 
brochure [28]. Palbociclib should be held for any subject who experiences a grade ≥ 3 non-
hematologic toxicities clearly related to palbociclib, grade 3 neutropenia with fever, or grade 4 
neutropenia, and resumed when symptoms improved to grade ≤2 at the next dose level. Palbociclib 
should be discontinued if no improvement of symptoms is seen within 3 weeks. Up to two dose 
reductions of palbociclib are allowed (100 mg, and 75 mg PO daily). Palbociclib dose should not 
be re-escalated for a subject after a dose reduction is made. Subject should discontinue palbociclib 
if a delay greater than three weeks is required due to treatment-related toxicity of palbociclib. 
Subjects may remain on study after discontinuation of palbociclib, if both letrozole and tucatinib 
are continued. 
Table 14. Dose modifications of palbociclib 
 
Dose level  
Dose  
Recommended starting dose  
125 mg/day  
First dose reduction  
100 mg/day  
Second dose reduction  
75 mg/day  
 
For the starting dose levels lower than 125mg/day, the same dose modification tiers above will be 
followed, with the lowest dose allotted being 75 mg/day. 
 
 
Dosing of palbociclib after February 15, 2019 (after the information on potential 
tucatinib – palbociclib interaction became available) 
 
Since the information became available on potential drug-drug interaction between 
tucatinib and palbociclib, palbociclib will be dosed at 75mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off for 
all study participants. No dose reduction levels will be allowed. Palbociclib will be held or 
discontinued for significant or unresolving toxicities as specified in tables 15 and 16. Patients who 
discontinued palbociclib may remain on study, as long as they continue to receive tucatinib and 
letrozole.  
 
Table 15. Palbociclib dose modifications for hematologic toxicities 
 
Hematologic toxicitiesa  
Dose modifications  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 67 of 115 
 
Grade 1 or 2  
No dose adjustment is required.  
Grade 3b  
No dose adjustment is required. Consider repeating complete 
blood count monitoring one week later. Withhold initiation of 
next cycle until recovery to Grade ≤2.  
Grade 3 ANC (<1000 to 500/mm3) 
+ Fever ≥38.5ºC and/or infection  
Withhold palbociclib and initiation of next cycle until recovery 
to Grade ≤2 (≥1000/mm3). Resume at the next lower dose c.  
Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with 
bleeding 
Withhold palbociclib and initiation of next cycle until recovery 
to Grade ≤2 and cessation of bleeding. Resume at the next 
lower dose c. 
Grade 4b  
Withhold palbociclib and initiation of next cycle until recovery 
to Grade ≤2. Resume at the next lower dose c.  
Abbreviations: Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) 
a - Monitor complete blood count prior to the start of palbociclib therapy and at the beginning of 
each cycle, as well as on Day 15 of the first two cycles, and as clinically indicated. b – Except 
lymphopenia (unless associated with clinical events, e.g., opportunistic infections). c – If patient 
is on the lowest possible dose of 75mg PO daily, palbociclib should be discontinued.  
 
Table 16. Palbociclib dose modifications for non-hematologic toxicities 
 
Non-Hematologic Toxicities  
Dose Modifications  
Grade 1 or 2  
No dose adjustment is required.  
Grade ≥3 
Withhold until symptoms resolve to:  
• Grade ≤1;  
• Grade ≤2 (if not considered a safety risk for the subject) 
Resume at the next lower dose a.  
a – If patient is on the lowest possible dose of 75mg PO daily, palbociclib should be discontinued.    
   
6.3.3 Dose modifications of tucatinib and palbociclib for toxicities potentially attributable  
to both drugs 
Examples of toxicities that might be attributed to both tucatinib and palbociclib include 
constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, nausea and rash. Both palbociclib and tucatinib should 
be held for any subject who experiences a Grade ≥ 3 AE related to the combination of tucatinib 
with palbociclib (as determined by the treating clinician and/or Investigator), and both drugs 
should be restarted at the next dose level if toxicity resolve to grade ≤1 within 3 weeks. Alopecia, 
grade 3 fatigue lasting ≤7 days, grade ≥3 electrolyte abnormalities returning to grade ≤1 within 72 
hours spontaneously or with optimal medical management, grade 3 rash in the absence of adequate 
management with anti-infectives and / or topical corticosteroids that improves with medical 
management in <72hrs, grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea in the absence of optimal use of anti-
emetic or antidiarrheal medications that improves with optimal medical management in < 72hrs, 
and grade ≥3 amylase or lipase elevation that is not associated with symptoms or clinical 
manifestations of pancreatitis do not require dose modifications of the study drugs. 
 
Table 17. Dose Modifications of tucatinib and palbociclib for toxicities that may be 
attributable to both drugs 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 68 of 115 
 
Toxicities potentially related to both tucatinib and 
palbociclib 
Dose modifications of tucatinib and 
palbociclib 
≥ Grade 3 AEs (other than grade 3 fatigue lasting ≤ 7 
days; alopecia; nausea; vomiting; diarrhea; rash; 
correctable electrolyte abnormalities returning to 
≤grade 1 in ≤ 72hrs). 
Hold until severity ≤ grade 1 or pre-
treatment level, restart at the next lower 
dose level a 
Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea WITHOUT 
optimal use of anti-emetics or anti-diarrheals 
Hold until severity ≤ grade 1 or pre-
treatment level. Initiate appropriate 
therapy. Restart without dose reduction if 
symptoms improve with optimal medical 
management in < 72hrs (otherwise, 
restart at the next lower dose level a). 
Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea WITH optimal 
use of anti-emetics or anti-diarrheals. 
Hold until severity ≤ grade 1 or pre-
treatment level. Restart at the next lower 
dose level a. 
Grade 4 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea regardless of 
use of anti-emetics or anti-diarrheals. 
Do not administer until severity ≤ grade 
1. Restart at the next lower dose level a. 
Grade 3 rash WITHOUT optimal use of topical 
corticosteroids or anti-infectives. 
Hold until severity ≤ grade 1 or pre-
treatment level. Initiate appropriate 
therapy. Restart without dose reduction if 
symptoms improve with optimal medical 
management in < 72hrs (otherwise, 
restart at the next lower dose level a). 
Grade 3 rash WITH optimal use of topical 
corticosteroids or anti-infectives. 
Hold until severity ≤ grade 1 or pre-
treatment level. Restart at the next lower 
dose level a. 
Grade 4 rash regardless of use of topical 
corticosteroids or anti-infectives. 
Permanently discontinue study drugs. 
Alopecia (any grade) 
No dose modifications 
Grade 3 fatigue lasting ≤7 days 
No dose modifications 
Grade ≥3 electrolyte abnormalities returning to ≤ 
grade 1 within 72hrs spontaneously or with optimal 
medical management 
No dose modifications (if no 
improvement within 72hrs, hold until 
severity improves to grade ≤1, restart at 
the next lower dose level) 
a – If patient is on the lowest possible dose level, the drug should be discontinued. 
 
6.3.4 Discontinuation of letrozole 
Letrozole will be administered at fixed dose 2.5mg PO daily with no dose adjustments. 
Premenopausal women enrolled in the study will be required to receive ovarian function 
suppression (goserelin 3.8 mg subcutaneously every 28 days is the recommended method; 
however, any standard drug and drug frequency for ovarian function suppression is allowed per 
discretion of treating physician with Lead PI approval). Letrozole-related AEs include hot flashes, 
arthralgias, myalgias, mood swings, vaginal dryness and urinary tract infections in the settings of 
vaginal dryness. Letrozole may be held for grade 3 toxicity clearly or potentially attributable to 
this drug, as determined by the treating physician. When symptoms resolve to ≤ grade 2, the subject 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 69 of 115 
 
may resume letrozole. If symptoms do not resolve to grade ≤2 within 3 weeks, or if the second 
episode of grade 3 toxicity occurs, letrozole should be discontinued. Subjects will be allowed to 
discontinue letrozole and remain on study if they continue taking both tucatinib and palbociclib 
and derive benefits from this therapy. 
 
6.4 
Concomitant medications 
All concomitant medications will be recorded in the electronic CRFs. Concomitant 
medications can be administered at the investigator’s discretion to conform to standard practice 
during the treatment period. 
 
6.4.1 Potential drug interactions 
Tucatinib is metabolized by CYP450 enzymes in human liver, primarily by CYP2C8 and 
to a lesser extent CYP3A4. To minimize the risk of potential drug-drug interaction, concurrent use 
of strong CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers (listed in the Appendix D), will not be 
allowed during the study period. Moderate CYP2C8 inhibitor trimethoprim sulfate is also 
prohibited in combination with tucatinib due to a case of increased LFTs in prior clinical trials. 
Moderate inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4, as well as moderate inhibitors of CYP2C8 other than 
trimethoprim (listed in the Appendix D) should be used with caution.  
 
New information on tucatinib inhibition of CYP3A4 became available from the study 
ONT-380-012. Preliminary PK results from this study indicated that coadministration of multiple 
doses of tucatinib (300 mg BID) with midazolam (a sensitive CYP3A substrate) increased the 
geometric mean midazolam exposure (AUC) approximately 5.85-fold (90% CI 5.14 to 6.66) in 
healthy subjects, compared with administration of midazolam alone. Therefore, tucatinib is a 
strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, and its use together with sensitive CYP3A4 substrate should be 
avoided, or doses of sensitive CYP3A4 substrates should be adjusted accordingly. 
Our safety analysis of phase Ib part of the study did not indicated excessive palbociclib 
toxicity or significant changes of PKs up to 8 hrs post administration of palbociclib with tucatinib. 
However, in the interest of safety of all participants, dosing of palbociclib for all patients enrolled 
in the study was changed to 75mg PO daily 21 days on, 7 days off (FDA approved dosing of 
palbociclib when co-administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors), once information of potential 
drug-drug interaction became available. Additional PKs will be obtained at late time points from 
10 patients enrolled in phase II part of the study as discussed in chapter 8.3 and table 19.  
 
Palbociclib is primarily metabolized by CYP3A and sulfotransferase (SULT) enzyme 
SULT2A1. Because of these, strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers (listed in the Appendix D) 
will not be allowed during the study. Palbociclib is a weak time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A 
following daily 125 mg dosing to a steady state. Administration of sensitive CYP3A4 substrate 
midazolam with multiple doses of palbociclib increased midazolam plasma exposure by 61% in 
healthy subjects, compared with administration of midazolam alone [28], which is consistent with 
palbociclib being a weak CYP3A4 inhibitor according to FDA drug interaction labeling 
(http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/DrugInteracti
onsLabeling/ucm093664.htm#table3-1). Therefore, sensitive CYP3A4 substrates with low 
therapeutic index (listed in the Appendix D) should be used with caution during study period. 
Palbociclib is FDA approved to be co-administered with letrozole, which is a weak 
CYP3A4 substrate. Co-administration of palbociclib with letrozole did not result in clinically 
significant drug interaction.  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 70 of 115 
 
Letrozole is a minor substrate of CYP3A4 and CYP2A6 and a strong inhibitor of CYP2A6. 
Letrozole may increase the serum concentration of methadone, the dose of methadone may need 
to be adjusted. Clinically, letrozole does not display any significant interaction with palbociclib or 
HER2-targeted agents.  
 
Table 18. Liver metabolism of tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole 
 
Drug 
Substrate of 
Inhibitor of 
tucatinib 
CYP2C8 
CYP3A4 (minor) 
CYP2C8, CYP2C9 (moderate) 
CYP2C19, CYP1A2, CYP2D6 (weak)  
CY3A4 (strong) a 
palbociclib 
CYP3A4 
SULT 
CYP3A (weak) 
letrozole 
CYP3A4 (minor) 
CYP2A6 (minor) 
CYP2A6 (strong) 
CYP2C19 (weak) 
a – Preliminary data from ONT-380-012 study 
 
  
6.4.2 Allowed concomitant therapy 
Subjects may continue to use any ongoing medications not prohibited by the inclusion and 
exclusion criteria. Efforts should be made to maintain stable doses of concomitant medications 
during the course of study treatment. During study treatment, subjects may receive supportive care 
to include: 
• Bisphosphonates, denosumab 
• Transfusions of blood and blood products 
• Antibiotics (except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and other prohibited medications listed 
in Appendix D) 
• Pain medications 
• Anti-diarrheals, anti-emetics, antacids, and laxatives 
• Acetaminophen and NSAIDs may be used to manage fever, myalgias or arthralgias 
• Anti-histamines may be used to manage drug-related AEs such pruritus 
• Topical creams and emollients 
• Vaginal estrogen preparations for relieve of vaginal dryness 
• Thoracentesis or paracentesis may be performed, if needed for comfort 
• Systemic anticoagulation with warfarin, heparin and low molecular weight heparins if 
required for prophylaxis or management of vascular thromboembolic events 
• If surgical intervention or localized radiation become indicated (for palliation), these 
interventions are permitted for non-target lesions in situations where other disease remains 
evaluable by RECIST 1.1 and / or RANO-BM criteria (Appendix C).These interventions 
should be avoided if clinically feasible until after the second response assessment, and the 
Lead PI should be consulted prior to the intervention occurring. Investigational drugs must 
be held during surgery / radiotherapy and for 1 week afterwards. If possible, the 
investigational drug should be held for 1 week prior to surgery and palliative radiotherapy. 
• Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids should be limited to ≤ physiologic replacement 
doses (i.e. prednisone ≤10 mg/day or equivalent). Short courses of higher dose systemic 
steroids (to treat COPD, gout, rheumatic disorders, etc.), are permitted. Intra-articular 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 71 of 115 
 
steroid injections are permitted. Use of non-systemic steroid use is permitted (e.g. cream, 
lotion, inhalers). 
• 
The use of growth factors support (G-CSF, PEGylated G-CSF) must follow institutiona l 
and ASCO guidelines. Antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis should be consistent with 
ASCO and institutional guidelines.  
 
6.4.3 Prohibited concomitant therapy 
The following therapies are prohibited during the study (unless otherwise noted): 
• Investigational drugs and devices 
• Anti-cancer therapy, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy other than tucatinib and 
palbociclib, and anti-hormonal therapy other than letrozole and agents for ovarian function 
suppression in premenopausal females 
• Radiation therapy, except for palliative radiotherapy at focal sites (not considered target 
lesions per RECIST 1.1 and / or RANO-BM criteria) that may be given after consultation 
with the Lead PI, if there remain other sites for assessment of disease response 
• The use of thrombopoietin agonists 
• The use of erythropoietin  
• Strong inhibitors 
or inducers of CYP2C8, and a moderate CYP2C8 inhibitor 
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (see Appendix D) 
• Strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 (see Appendix D)  
Note that sensitive substrates of CYP3A4 should be use with caution and close monitoring 
for side effects (see Appendix D) 
 
7 
STUDY PROCEDURES 
The schedule of events is summarized in the Study Calendar Table. Study activities are listed 
by visit in this section. Descriptions of study assessments are presented in Section 8. All 
assessments performed on Day 1 of all treatment cycles should be performed prior to 
administration of study drugs, unless otherwise indicated. If the timing of a protocol-mandated 
procedure coincides with a holiday and/or weekend that precludes the procedure within the allotted 
window, the procedure should be performed on the nearest following date.  Sites are required to 
submit an enrollment packet that will include a Subject Eligibility Checklist prior to enrollment of 
the subject.  A confirmation of enrollment will be provided to the site by Criterium or designee.   
 
7.1 
Baseline 
The following procedures/assessments must be performed within 28 days prior to the first dose 
of study drugs: 
• Subject signature on informed consent form 
• Documentation of study eligibility per inclusion/exclusion criteria 
• Documentation of ER and /or PR positivity (defined by IHC according to the most recent 
ASCO/CAP guidelines) in the metastatic tumor biopsy (if metastatic tumor is not 
accessible for biopsy, documentation of ER and / or PR positivity in the primary tumor 
biopsy is acceptable) 
• Documentation of HER2 positivity defined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) 
and/or 3+ staining by IHC according to the most recent ASCO/CAP guidelines in the 
metastatic tumor biopsy (if metastatic tumor was not biopsies, documentation of HER2 
positivity in the primary tumor biopsy is acceptable)  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 72 of 115 
 
• Baseline signs and symptoms 
• Documentation of disease history, including year of initial breast cancer diagnosis, tumor 
grade and stage at initial diagnosis (if available), year of diagnosis of metastatic disease, 
location of known metastatic lesions, and all prior therapies 
• Documentation of baseline medical and surgical conditions 
• Documentation of concomitant medications 
• Vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature) 
• Height (only needed for the initial baseline assessment)  
• Weight 
• Physical exam 
• ECOG performance status 
• Hematology, blood chemistry, liver function tests, coagulation tests (PT/INR and PTT) 
• For females of childbearing potential – serum pregnancy test and plan for contraception on 
protocol. Women receiving ovarian suppression are recommended to receive counselling 
on additional forms of contraception to be used while on study treatment.  
• Transthoracic ECHO or MUGA to assess LVEF (Note: that whichever testing modality is 
chosen in screening should be used for all subsequent cardiac assessments throughout the 
study for comparison) 
• Diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan to document all sites of disease and assess tumor 
burden based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. Brain MRI is not required for neurologically 
asymptomatic subjects without known brain metastases. Baseline brain MRI is required in 
subjects with neurological symptoms and/or known brain metastases to allow assessment 
of disease by RANO-BM. 
• EKG  
• Research blood sample for assessment of potential biomarkers of response (please refer to 
the Study Lab Manual for details) 
• Pre-treatment tumor biopsy (optional, but highly encouraged) 
• Collection of primary and / or metastatic tumor blocks and / or slides will be initiated after 
enrollment (please refer to the Study Lab Manual for details) 
Following successful completion of the baseline assessments and confirmation of eligibility 
subjects may be enrolled.  
 
 
 
7.2 
Trial Period 
7.2.1 Cycle 1 Day 1 
• Documentation of AEs 
• Documentation of concomitant medications 
• Physical examination* 
• Vital signs (heart rate, BP, temperature), body weight 
• ECOG PS* 
• Blood samples for hematology, clinical chemistry and liver function tests (results must be 
reviewed and eligibility confirmed prior to first dose of study drugs)* 
• Dispense tucatinib and palbociclib (except patients enrolled in phase II part that have PK 
evaluation on cycle 1 day 9; in those patients tucatinib will be held and should not be 
dispensed until PK assessment is completed)  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 73 of 115 
 
• For patients having PK analysis on cycle 1 day 9, recommend to take palbociclib and letrozole at 
PM time (otherwise – palbociclib and letrozole can be taken at any time during the day, as long 
as 24hr intervals between doses are maintained) 
* These assessments do not need to be repeated if performed within 72 hours of C1D1. 
 
7.2.2 Cycle 1 Day 8 
• 
Patients enrolled in phase II part of the study who have PKs scheduled on the next day 
(day 9) should take high calorie / high protein meal at 8:00PM and palbociclib at 
10:00PM. Phone call by coordinator is recommended to remind the patient about timing. 
Patient can take letrozole at any time during the day. Patient records timing of study 
drugs in the diary. 
 
7.2.3 Cycle 1 Day 9 
• 
Patients who are part of phase II PK analysis, will have PK blood draws at 10, 13, 16, 19 
hrs post dose (8AM, 11AM, 2PM, 5PM +/- 10min). 
• 
After completion of cycle 1 day 9 PKs, tucatinib should be dispensed 
• 
Patient can resume tucatinib and continue letrozole and palbociclib per study schedule 
 
7.2.4 Cycle 1 Day 15 (±2 days) 
• Documentation of AEs 
• Documentation of concomitant medications  
• Vital signs (heart rate, BP, temperature), body weight 
• Blood samples for hematology test (CBC and differential) 
• PKs for palbociclib and tucatinib will be obtained in 20 subjects enrolled in phase Ib part of the 
study. PKs will be obtained prior to dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib, and in 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 
hrs after the dose (according to PK schedule, section 8.3). Subject should take the morning dose 
of tucatinib and daily dose of palbociclib after pre-treatment PK blood draw has been obtained 
 
7.2.5 Cycle 2 Day 1 and Day 1 of all subsequent cycles (±2 days) 
• Documentation of AEs 
• Documentation of concomitant medications 
• Physical examination 
• Vital signs (heart rate, BP, temperature), body weight 
• ECOG PS 
• Blood samples for hematology, clinical chemistry and liver function tests 
• Blood samples for PK analysis prior to the dose of tucatinib and palbociclib – cycle 2 
only, only for 20 subjects enrolled in phase Ib part (for full PK schedule, see section 8.3) 
• Research blood sample for assessment of potential biomarkers of response (cycle 2 only) 
• Review tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole drug compliance from previous cycle 
• Dispense tucatinib and palbociclib 
• Administer the morning dose of tucatinib 
• For patients enrolled in phase II part of the study that will have PK analysis on cycle 2 
day 9, recommend to take palbociclib and letrozole at PM time (otherwise – palbociclib 
and letrozole can be taken at any time during the day as long as 24hr intervals between 
doses are maintained) 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 74 of 115 
 
• Highly encouraged optional tumor biopsy (can be performed at any time during cycle 2). 
 
7.2.6 Cycle 2 Day 8 
• 
Patients who have PKs scheduled on the next day (day 9) should take high calorie / high 
protein meal at 8:00PM, and take tucatinib and palbociclib at 10:00PM. Phone call by 
coordinator is recommended to remind the patient about timing. Patient can take letrozole 
at any time during the day. Patient records timing of study drugs in the diary. 
 
7.2.7 Cycle 2 Day 9 
• Patients who are part of phase II PK analysis, will have PK blood draws at 10, 13, 16, 19 
hrs post dose (8AM, 11AM, 2PM, 5PM). 
• Patient will be due for morning dose of tucatinib approximately at 10AM and should take 
it about 10:00AM (between PK blood draws) 
• After completion of PKs, all study medications are continued per study protocol 
 
7.2.8 Cycle 2 Day 15 (±2 days) 
• Documentation of AEs 
• Documentation of concomitant medications  
• Vital signs (heart rate, BP, temperature), body  weight  
• Blood samples for hematology (CBC and differential)  
 
7.2.9 Cycle 2, 4, and 6, day 26 (±3 days) 
• Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor burden based upon RECIST 
1.1 and/or RANO-MB. Recommended imaging include CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis 
with contrast and NM bone scan. Additionally, contrast-enhanced brain MRI should be 
performed in subjects with known CNS metastatic disease. 
If cycles are delayed for any reason, then perform radiographic assessment of all known sites 
of metastatic disease 8 weeks (±3 days) from the previous scan. 
 
7.2.10 Cycle 3 day 26, and thereafter every third cycle (±3 days) 
• Transthoracic ECHO or MUGA, using the same cardiac testing modality performed in 
screening / baseline 
If cycles are delayed for any reason or there is an interim assessment, then perform 12 weeks 
(±3 days) from previous ECHO or MUGA. 
 
7.2.11 Cycle 9 day 26, and thereafter every third cycle (±3 days) 
• Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor burden based upon RECIST 
1.1 and/or RANO-MB. Recommended imaging include CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis 
with contrast and NM bone scan. Additionally, contrast-enhanced brain MRI should be 
performed in subjects with known CNS metastatic disease.  
If cycles are delayed for any reason or there is an interim assessment, then perform 12 weeks 
(±3 days) from the previous scan. 
 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 75 of 115 
 
7.3 
End of treatment visit 
End of treatment visit will occur for all subjects when disease progression is documented 
and/or subsequent anticancer therapy is initiated, or the subject is withdrawn from treatment 
for any other reason. The visit should occur at the time or within 7 days after the subject 
discontinued study drugs. The following procedures/assessments will be carried out as 
described in the Study Calendar and unless performed in the previous week. Every effort 
should be made to have a final tumor assessment. 
• Documentation of AEs 
• Documentation of concomitant medications 
• Review tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole drug compliance from previous cycle 
• Vital signs, including weight 
• Physical exam 
• ECOG performance status 
• Hematology, blood chemistry, liver function tests 
• Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor burden based upon RECIST 
1.1 and/or RANO-MB. Recommended imaging include CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis 
with contrast and NM bone scan. Additionally, contrast-enhanced brain MRI should be 
performed in subjects with known CNS metastatic disease. If a subject had required 
imaging studies within 30 days from visit, these studies will not need to be repeated. 
• ECHO or MUGA, as appropriate, if not done within previous 12 weeks 
• Tumor biopsy (optional) 
• Research blood sample 
 
7.4 
Thirty days post-treatment follow-up (±3 days) 
Additional safety follow up visit shall occur in 30±3 days after the subject discontinued 
treatment with study drug. This visit shall include: 
• Documentation of AEs 
• Documentation of concomitant medications 
• Vital signs, including weight 
• Physical exam 
• ECOG performance status 
• Hematology, blood chemistry, liver function tests 
 
7.5 
Subject withdrawal 
In the absence of treatment delays due to AE(s), treatment may continue until one of the 
following criteria applies: 
• Disease progression 
• Death 
• Specific changes in the subject's condition that render the subject unacceptable for further 
treatment in the judgment of the investigator 
• Subject non-compliance with protocol requirements (determined via meeting with PI or 
Sub-Investigator, clinical research coordinator, and subject) 
• Unacceptable AE(s). Any grade 4 study-drug related AE is unacceptable and will lead to 
withdrawal  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 76 of 115 
 
• Withdrawal of consent (attempts should be made to clarify with the subject, if withdrawal 
is specific to study participation, or if it applies to data collection as well). Note: subjects 
lost to follow up (defined as no contact > 42 days after last on-study contact and at least 3 
attempts) are considered to have withdrawn study participation consent. Data collection is 
permissible. Date of last contact will be recorded as the withdrawal date. 
• Study termination by sponsor 
In case of intercurrent illness that prevents administration of the study drugs for ≥21 days, or 
other reasons for the interruption of therapy for ≥21 days unrelated to disease progression / study 
drug toxicity (for example, loss of insurance), consultation with the lead study PI is advised. Such 
rare cases should be considered on an individual basis (depending on subject’s prior response to 
study therapies, stability of disease, and duration of treatment interruption). Decision whether a 
patient can go back on study in this situation should be discussed between the Investigator and the 
lead study PI.  
The reason for withdrawal must be recorded in the subject’s electronic case report form 
(eCRF). The subject should complete the evaluations scheduled for the End of Treatment Visit and 
Safety Follow-up, provided written consent to do so has not been withdrawn. If an unacceptable 
AE is the cause for withdrawal, then “Adverse Event” should be recorded as the reason for 
withdrawal rather than physician decision or subject decision. Subjects who discontinue tucatinib 
or both palbociclib and letrozole will be withdrawn from the study; reason for withdrawal for these 
subjects should be recorded as an “adverse event” if AE led to discontinuation of study drugs. 
Subjects who withdraw from the study will not be replaced. 
 
8 
ASSESSMENTS 
8.1 
Safety evaluations 
Safety assessments will consist of monitoring and recording AEs and SAEs, physical 
examination and vital signs, and measurement of protocol-specified clinical laboratory tests, ECG, 
and imaging studies. Clinically significant changes in these parameters may be captured as AEs 
and SAEs. The investigator must notify Criterium and Pfizer Inc. of any SAE experienced by 
subject within 24 hours of first awareness of the event (immediately upon awareness if the event 
is fatal or life-threatening). Subsequent timely notification of the Lead PI, medical monitor, Seattle 
Genetics, Inc. and the University of Colorado Cancer Center DSMC will be done by Criterium. 
SAE reporting is described in detail in chapter 9.9.1.  
The investigator is responsible for the appropriate medical care and the safety of subjects 
who have entered this study. The investigator must document all AEs and SAEs, including the 
type, severity (graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03), seriousness, timing and attribution to study 
drugs. Baseline signs and symptoms will be recorded at the time of study enrollment and then 
reported as AEs during the trial if they worsen in severity or increase in frequency. 
 
8.1.1 Laboratory assessments 
All safety labs will be analyzed by the site’s local laboratory. The minimum requested lab 
data includes: 
 
• Hematology 
• White blood cell count (WBC) 
• Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 
• Platelet count 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 77 of 115 
 
• Hemoglobin 
• WBC differential 
Blood Chemistry: 
• Glucose 
• BUN 
• Creatinine 
• Sodium 
• Potassium 
• Calcium 
Liver function tests: 
• Albumin 
• ALT 
• AST 
• Alkaline phosphatase 
• Total bilirubin 
Coagulation tests: 
• PT/INR 
• PTT 
Investigators may order additional blood tests for planning treatment administrations, dose 
modification, or further evaluation of AEs. 
 
8.1.2 EKG assessments 
Twelve lead EKGs will be performed at baseline. Electrocardiogram assessments are 
recommended to be performed after the measurement of vital signs, with the subject supine and 
rested for 5 minutes. The date and time of EKG assessment should be recorded.  
 
8.1.3 Safety plan for cardiotoxicity 
 
HER2-targeted therapies are known to increase the risk of the development of 
asymptomatic and symptomatic declines in LVEF. Cardiac function will therefore be monitored 
closely. Subjects will be monitored throughout the study for the occurrence of any cardiac 
symptoms. Assessment of cardiac ejection fraction will be performed by MUGA or ECHO at 
baseline screening, once every 12 weeks (±3 days) thereafter until study discontinuation, and at 
the end of treatment visit unless done within 12 weeks prior this visit. Whichever testing modality 
is chosen in screening should be used for all subsequent cardiac assessments throughout the study 
for comparison. Dose modifications or discontinuation of tucatinib in case of cardiac toxicity will 
be performed as described in the section 6.3.1. Any decline in LVEF leading to a change of 
tucatinib dose or discontinuation of tucatinib treatment is considered an event of special interest 
and an SAE, and must be reported within 24 hours of discovery of the event as described in the 
sections 9.9.1 and 9.9.3. 
 
 
8.1.4 Safety plan for hepatotoxicity 
While not among the most common adverse reactions reported in subjects taking tucatinib, 
grade 3 and 4 elevation of LFTs has been seen in some subjects on tucatinib, and monitoring of 
liver function tests is required for any subject taking tucatinib. LFT elevations seen in the studies 
of tucatinib are briefly summarized below (data cut-off date of 27 May 2015).  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 78 of 115 
 
Among 41 subjects treated in the Phase 1b combination study of tucatinib plus capecitabine 
and trastuzumab (Study ONT-380-005), only 2 subjects (5%) experienced grade 3 elevation of 
AST/ALT, and in both subjects the elevation was reversible and the subjects were able to continue 
on study after dose reduction. Of the 2 subjects with grade 3 elevation of AST/ALT, one was 
treated with tucatinib plus capecitabine, while the other was treated with tucatinib plus 
capecitabine plus trastuzumab. In the Phase 1b study of tucatinib plus TDM-1 (Study ONT-380-
004), elevations of liver function tests were observed more frequently than in Study ONT-380-
005. This is likely due to the fact that this is an overlapping toxicity with TDM-1, which has 
previously been associated with hepatotoxicity. Grade 3 AST/ALT elevation occurred in 7 out of 
43 subjects (16%) and has been reversible with dose interruption and reduction except in 2 subjects 
found to have progressive liver metastases. An additional subject in the Dana Farber Cancer 
Institute investigator-sponsored trial had an event of grade 4 hepatocellular toxicity, with grade 4 
elevation of ALT/AST and grade 3 elevation of total bilirubin. The subject’s LFTs normalized 
after discontinuation of ONT-380. Complicating features of the event included the concomitant 
use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, which may increase tucatinib levels via inhibition of 
CYP2C8. In all the studies of tucatinib to date there were no cases of LFT elevation meeting the 
protocol pre-determined criteria for drug-induced liver injury [74]. 
Because of the known risk of elevation of liver enzymes with tucatinib, subjects will have 
LFTs closely monitored. Any potential case of drug-induced liver injury (Hy’s law) will be treated 
as a protocol-defined event of special interest and an SAE if it meets the following criteria: AST 
or ALT elevations that are > 3 X ULN with concurrent elevation of total bilirubin > 2 X the ULN 
(within 21 days of AST and/or ALT elevations), except in subjects with documented Gilbert’s 
syndrome [74]. Any such events should be promptly reported within 24hours of discovery as 
described in the sections 9.9.1 and 9.9.3. Tucatinib drug hold and dose modifications for LFT 
elevations not meeting these criteria are outlined in in section 6.3.1. 
Although LFT elevation is much more likely to be attributed to tucatinib, palbociclib may 
contribute. Therefore, in all cases of bilirubin or ALT / AST elevation of ≥G3, both tucatinib 
and palbociclib should be put on hold, and lead PI should be consulted regarding the 
attribution of toxicity. 
 
8.1.5 Safety plan for neutropenia and infection risk 
 
Decreased neutrophil count and infections are common side effects of palbociclib, although 
in all published studies of palbociclib to serious infections in the settings of neutropenia were 
relatively 
uncommon. Pooled analysis of PALOMA-1 and PALOMA-2 clinical 
trials 
demonstrated that grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was reported in 55.3 and 10.1%, respectively, in 
subjects receiving palbociclib plus letrozole [75]. In PALOMA-1 clinical trial, median time to the 
first episode of any grade neutropenia was 15 days (13-117 days), median duration of Grade ≥3 
neutropenia was 7 days. WBC and ANC will therefore be monitored closely in all subjects enrolled 
into this clinical trial. Subjects will have WBC and ANC measured prior to starting palbociclib 
therapy, at the beginning of each cycle, on Day 15 of the first two cycles, and as clinically 
indicated. Dose modifications or discontinuation of palbociclib in case of severe neutropenia will 
be performed as described in Section 6.3.2. In the current protocol, dose modification plan for 
palbociclib follows FDA recommendations listed in the palbociclib Full Prescribing Information 
Brochure [28].  
Infections have been reported at a higher rate in subjects treated with palbociclib plus 
letrozole compared to subjects treated with letrozole alone: Grade 3 or 4 infections occurred in 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 79 of 115 
 
5.2% of subjects treated with palbociclib plus letrozole whereas only 2.5% of subjects treated with 
letrozole alone experienced a Grade 3 infection, and no one experienced a Grade 4 infection [75]. 
Therefore, study subjects will be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of infections and 
treated with antibiotics as medically appropriate. All serious neutropenic and infectious AEs will 
be promptly reported as described in section 9.9.1. 
 
8.1.6 Safety plan for subjects with CNS metastases 
Subjects with CNS metastases are at risk for occurrence of AEs due to the presence of CNS 
lesions, progression of disease and toxicities potentially related to study treatment. In order to 
minimize the risk of AEs in subjects with brain metastases in this study, subjects with high-risk 
metastases, including those requiring immediate local therapy, those with rapidly progressing 
lesions, those requiring unstable doses of corticosteroids at the start of the study for control of CNS 
symptoms are excluded from the trial. Enrollment of subjects with asymptomatic untreated CNS 
lesions >2cm is discouraged, but may be allowed after a consultation with Lead PI.  
On occasion, treatment of CNS metastases with systemic or radiation therapy has been 
associated with localized edema thought to be due to treatment effect and not tumor progression. 
Under select circumstances, as outlined in the RANO-BM criteria, subjects may receive 
corticosteroid therapy for acute management of symptomatic local edema, as long as brain MRI 
does not show clear evidence of CNS progression. All such instances require approval from the 
Lead PI.  
Because of previously described association between approved HER2-targeted therapies and 
rare cases of brain edema [76], any event of cerebral edema not clearly attributable to progression 
of disease should be reported as an event of special interest within 72 hours. Grade 3 cerebral 
edema meeting criteria for an SAE should be reported within 24 hours, as described in the sections 
9.9.1 and 9.9.3.  
 
8.1.7 Safety plan for prevention of pregnancy 
  
Due to the potential effect on embryo-fetal development from all three drugs used in this 
study, premenopausal women of childbearing potential defined as premenopausal women who are 
not permanently sterile (i.e., due to hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, 
or bilateral tubal occlusion) are required to have negative pregnancy tests prior to initiation of 
treatment. Women of childbearing potential and men with partners of childbearing potential must 
agree to use a highly effective form of non-hormonal contraception by the patient and/or partner. 
Hormonal contraception is contraindicated in patients with HR+ breast cancer, therefore, it cannot 
be used by study subjects. Effective methods of non-hormonal contraception include IUD; female 
condom; diaphragm with spermicide; cervical cap; use of a condom by the sexual partner; or a 
sterile sexual partner. Women of childbearing potential and men with partners of childbearing 
potential enrolled in this study should practice effective method of contraception, as described 
above, starting from the signing of informed consent until 30 days after the end of the study. 
 
8.2 
Efficacy evaluations 
Following initiation of study treatment, measurement of all known sites of metastatic disease 
will be obtained at the end of every 8 week period (±3 days) for study cycles 1-6, then at the end 
of every 12 week period (±3 days) until PD, initiation of a new therapy, withdrawal of consent, or 
study closure. Recommended imaging include contrast-enhanced CT of the chest, abdomen and 
pelvis and NM bone scan. For subjects with known CNS disease, restaging imaging studies must 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 80 of 115 
 
include contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain. Detailed schedule of radiographic assessments is 
specified in the section 7.2 of the protocol. The scans will remain on this schedule irrespective of 
dose interruptions. The same imaging technique used to characterize each identified and reported 
lesion at baseline will be employed in the following tumor assessments. Additional imaging may 
be done as appropriate at the discretion of the investigator. 
All subjects’ files and radiologic images must be available for source verification if required. 
All treatment decisions will be made on the basis of local investigator assessment of radiologic 
imaging based on RECIST version 1.1, or, for subjects with CNS disease, based on RECIST 1.1 
and RANO-BM (as defined in the Appendix C). 
In the event of equivocal progression and no imminent threat to subject safety, all efforts 
should be made to continue the subject until unequivocal radiologic or clinical progression is 
documented, as defined in RECIST 1.1 and/or RANO-BM.  
 
In this trial, if a subject is found to have progressive disease due to CNS progression per 
RANO-BM, but does not have progressive disease outside the CNS per RECIST 1.1, the subject 
may undergo local therapy (radiotherapy or surgery) to the progressive CNS lesion(s), and 
continue on study after discussion with and approval from the PI. The subject may continue on 
study until a second progressive disease event occurs (either CNS or non-CNS). 
 
8.3 
Pharmacokinetic evaluations 
 
PK assessments of blood levels of tucatinib and palbociclib will be performed on Cycle 1 
Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 of therapy in 20 participants enrolled in phase Ib part of the study. 
Plasma samples will be collected to measure levels of tucatinib and its hydroxyl metabolite, as 
well as levels of palbociclib and, if needed, its metabolites at steady state on Cycle 1 Day 15. 
Plasma samples will also be collected prior to administration of tucatinib and palbociclib on the 
first day of Cycles 2 to assess trough levels. 
 
Additional PK assessment will be done in 5 to 10 patients enrolled in phase II part of the 
study to evaluate the levels of tucatinib and palbociclib. These PKs will be done on Cycle 1 Day 
9 and Cycle 2 Day 9. Prior to the first set of PKs, on Cycle 1 Days 1-8, patient will take palbociclib 
and letrozole; tucatinib will be on hold. Tucatinib should be dispensed and started per usual study 
schedule after the first set of PKs is obtained on Day 9. Prior to the second set of PKs, on Cycle 2 
Days 1-8, patient will take palbociclib, letrozole and tucatinib (all study drugs) per usual study 
schedule. On the day prior to PK evaluation (Day 8 of Cycle 1 and Day 8 of Cycle 2), patient 
should consume high calorie / high fat meal at 8:00PM and take study drugs at 10:00PM. On the 
next day, plasma samples will be collected to measure PKs at 10, 13, 16 and 19 hrs +/- 10 minutes 
post dose (8:00AM, 11:00AM, 2:00PM and 5:00PM on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 2 Day 9). For 
detailed information on phase II PKs, refer to the LabConnect Manual (PK collection manual) 
provided by Seattle Genetics, Inc.  
 
Table 19. Schedule of pharmacokinetic assessments 
 
Cycle  
Day  
Time point 
Phase Ib PK assessment 
1 
15 
0 h (pre-dose) prior to dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
0.5 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
1 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
2 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 81 of 115 
 
3 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
4 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
6 h (±30 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
2 
1 
0 h (pre-dose) prior to dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib 
Phase II PK assessment (late PK time points) 
1 
1-8 
Patient takes palbociclib 75mg and letrozole 2.5mg PO every evening 
(tucatinib is on hold). On day 8, patient consumes high fat / high calorie 
meal at 8:00PM and take palbociclib at 10:00PM (leterozole at any time). 
Patient record time of study medications in the diary. 
1 
9 
10 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (8AM) 
 
 
13 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (11AM) 
 
 
16 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (2PM) 
 
 
19 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of palbociclib (5PM) 
1 
9-28 
Post-PKs, patient starts tucatinib, continues on palbociclib and letrozole 
per study schedule 
2 
1-8 
Patient takes palbociclib, tucatinib and letrozole per study schedule. On 
day 8, patient consumes high fat / high calorie meal at 8:00PM and take 
palbociclib and the evening dose of tucatinib at 10:00PM (leterozole at any 
time). Patient record time of study medications in the diary.  
2 
9 
10 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (8AM)* 
 
 
13 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (11AM) 
 
 
16 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (2PM) 
 
 
19 h (±10 minutes) following dosing of tucatinib and palbociclib (5PM) 
*About 10:00AM patient will be due for the next morning dose of tucatinib, and should 
take it approximately at this time 
All efforts will be made to obtain the PK samples at the exact nominal time relative to dosing. 
However, samples obtained within 10 minutes of the nominal time is acceptable, with the exact 
time of the sample collection noted on the source document and CRF. PK samples will be assayed 
with liquid chromatography. For further details on collection, processing and shipment of PK 
samples, see LabConnect manual. 
In addition to the samples collected at the scheduled times, additional PK blood samples 
may be requested from subjects experiencing unexpected AEs or SAEs.  
 
8.4 
Collection of patient material for correlative studies 
 
Subjects will have three research blood samples drawn pre-treatment, after 28 days of 
treatment (±3 days), and after completion of all study treatments at the end of the study. These 
blood samples will be obtained for ctDNA analysis and analysis of other circulating markers 
associated with cancer prognosis or outcomes from treatment. Subjects will be asked to undergo 
tumor core needle biopsies pre-treatment and at any time during cycle 2. These paired tumor 
biopsies are optional, but highly encouraged. For highly motivated subjects there will be an option 
to get a third tumor biopsy at the time of disease progression or study withdrawal for other reasons. 
For detailed instructions on collection, processing and shipment of research blood samples and 
biopsy samples, please refer to the Study Lab Manual. 
 
Residual blood and tumor samples left after analysis may be saved in the study biorepository 
if study subject provides voluntary consent for future research. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 82 of 115 
 
 
8.5 
Concomitant medications 
Medications used by the subject and therapeutic procedures completed by the study subject 
will be recorded in the CRFs from screening through 30 days after the last dose of study drug.  
 
9 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING 
9.1 
Adverse events 
All observed or volunteered AEs regardless of suspected causal relationship to the study 
drugs will be reported as described in the following sections. For all adverse events, the 
investigator must pursue and obtain information adequate both to determine the outcome of the 
AE and to assess whether it meets criteria for classification as SAE (see Section 9.5). The 
investigator is required to assess causality. For SAEs with a causal relationship to the study drugs, 
follow-up by the investigator with subsequent submission of SAE follow up report (as described 
in section 9.9.1) is required until the event or its sequelae resolve or stabilize at a level acceptable 
to the investigator. 
 
9.2 
Reporting period 
Reporting period begins from the day the subject signs the consent form through 30 calendar 
days after the last administration of the study drugs. During this time all AEs should be recorded 
in the CRFs. Any SAE occurring any time during the reporting period must be promptly reported 
to Criterium and Pfizer, Inc. within 24 hours of Investigator learning about an SAE (immediately 
upon awareness if the event is fatal or life threatening). Subsequent timely notification of the Lead 
PI, medical monitor, Seattle Genetics, Inc. and University of Colorado Cancer Center DSMC will 
be done by Criterium. Lead study PI will report all SAEs to the Colorado Multiple Institutional 
Review Board (COMIRB) as directed by COMIRB policy.  
Additionally, Investigator should report SAEs to the local DSMC or DSMB at his / her 
institution per local DSMC/DSMB policy, and to the institutional IRB per local IRB policy.  
If Investigator becomes aware of an SAE occurring any time after the administration of the 
last dose of the study drugs, Investigator should report that SAE if he/she suspects a causal 
relationship between the study drugs and an SAE. 
 
9.3 
Definition of an Adverse Event 
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a 
product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the 
treatment or usage. Examples of AEs include but are not limited to: 
• Abnormal test findings 
• Clinically significant symptoms and signs 
• Changes in physical examination findings 
• Hypersensitivity 
Additionally, they may include the signs or symptoms resulting from: 
• Drug overdose 
• Drug withdrawal 
• Drug abuse 
• Drug misuse 
• Drug interactions 
• Drug dependency 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 83 of 115 
 
Worsening signs and symptoms of the malignancy under trial should be reported as AEs in the 
appropriate section of the CRF. Disease progression assessed by measurement of malignant lesions 
on radiographs or other methods should not be reported as an AE unless the outcome is fatal within 
the safety reporting period. 
 
9.4 
Abnormal Test Findings 
 
The criteria for determining whether an abnormal objective test finding should be reported 
as an AE are as follows: 
• Test result is associated with accompanying symptoms, and/or 
• Test result requires additional diagnostic testing or medical/surgical intervention, and/or 
• Test result leads to a change in study drug dosing or discontinuation of the trial, significant 
additional concomitant drug treatment, or other therapy, and/or 
• Test result is considered to be an AE by the investigator or sponsor. 
Merely repeating an abnormal test, in the absence of any of the above conditions, does not 
constitute an AE. Any abnormal test result that is determined to be an error does not require 
reporting as an AE. 
 
9.5 
Serious Adverse Events 
An SAE is any event, without regard to causality, that is life-threatening (i.e., causes an 
immediate risk of death) or that results in any of the following outcomes: death; in-patient 
hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability or 
incapacity (i.e., substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); or a 
congenital anomaly or birth defect. Any other medical event that, in the medical judgment of the 
Investigator, may jeopardize the subject or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent 
one of the outcomes listed above is also considered an SAE. A planned medical or surgical 
procedure is not, in itself, an SAE. 
Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury as assessed by laboratory test values and outlined 
in section 8.1.4 meet definition of SAE. If a study subject develops abnormal values of AST or 
ALT or both concurrent with abnormal elevation of total bilirubin and no other known cause of 
liver injury (ALT or AST >= 3x ULN and total bilirubin >= 2x ULN) [74] as defined in section 
8.1.4), this event should be reported as SAE.  
Progression of the malignancy under trial (including signs and symptoms of progression) is 
reported as SAE only if it resulted in hospitalization, or if the outcome is fatal within the safety 
reporting period. If the malignancy has a fatal outcome during the trial or within the safety 
reporting period, then the event leading to death must be recorded as an adverse event and as SAE 
with CTCAE grade 5 (see Section 9.7, Severity Assessment). 
 
9.6 
Hospitalization 
Adverse events reported from clinical trials associated with hospitalization or prolongation of 
hospitalization is considered serious. Hospitalization does not include the following: 
• Rehabilitation facilities 
• Hospice facilities 
• Respite care 
• Skilled nursing facilities 
• Nursing homes 
• Same day surgeries (out-patient/same day/ambulatory procedures) 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 84 of 115 
 
Hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization in the absence of a precipitating, clinical 
AE is not in itself a SAE. Examples include: 
• Admission for treatment of a preexisting condition not associated with the development of 
a new AE, or with a worsening of the preexisting condition clearly not related to the study 
drugs 
• Social admission (e.g., patient has no place to sleep) 
• Admission for a procedure required by the trial protocol 
• Optional admission not associated with a precipitating clinical AE (e.g., for elective 
cosmetic surgery) 
• Hospitalization for observation without a medical AE 
• Admission exclusively for the administration of blood products 
 
9.7 
Severity Assessment 
The investigator will use the definitions of Severity in accordance with NCI-CTCAE version 
4.03 to describe the AE. 
 
Table 20. General AE Grading Assessment 
 
GRADE Clinical Description of Severity 
1 
MILD adverse event 
2 
MODERATE adverse events 
3 
SEVERE adverse events 
4 
LIFE-THREATENING OR DISABLING adverse events 
5 
DEATH RELATED TO adverse events 
 
Note the distinction between the severity and the seriousness of an AE. A severe event is not 
necessarily a serious event. For example, a headache may be severe (interferes significantly with 
patient's usual function) but would not be classified as serious unless it met one of the criteria for 
SAEs, listed above. 
 
9.8 
Causality Assessment 
The investigator’s assessment of causality must be provided for all AEs (serious and non-
serious). An investigator’s causality assessment is the determination of whether there exists a 
reasonable possibility that the investigational product caused or contributed to an adverse event. If 
the investigator’s final determination of causality is unknown and the investigator does not know 
whether or not investigational product caused the event, then the event will be handled as “related 
to investigational product” for reporting purposes. 
 
9.9 
Reporting Requirements 
Each AE is to be assessed to determine if it meets the criteria for an SAE, and reported 
promptly according to requirements specified below. All AEs will be reported on the AE page(s) 
of the CRF. Additionally, investigators will report SAEs using separate SAE reporting forms. The 
reportable event fax cover sheet must be included with each SAE submitted. 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 85 of 115 
 
9.9.1 Serious adverse event reporting requirements 
 
All AEs that are serious, regardless of relationship to study drug, that occur after the subject 
signs the consent form must be reported to Criterium and Pfizer, Inc. on a SAE form with the 
reportable event fax cover sheet within 24 hours of discovery of the event (immediately if event is 
fatal or life threatening). SAE form and reportable event fax cover sheet should be faxed to Pfizer, 
Inc. (Pfizer U.S. Clinical Trial Department fax #: 1-866-997-8322). The SAE report form and 
reportable 
event fax cover sheet should 
be scanned and e-mailed 
to 
Criterium 
(ABRCCPfizerSAE@criteriuminc.com). Upon receiving information about SAE, Criterium 
will forward this information to the Lead PI, medical monitor, Seattle Genetics, Inc. and the 
University of Colorado Cancer Center DSMC in a timely manner. Additionally, initial and follow 
up SAE reports should be provided by site investigators to their IRBs and DSMCs/DSMBs in 
accordance with their policies. Lead study PI will submit information on all SAEs to the COMIRB 
in accordance with the COMIRB policy. Any new information or follow-up information pertaining 
to previously reported SAEs should be reported within 24 hours of becoming aware of the new or 
follow-up information. For initial SAE reports, at a minimum, the following should be included: 
• Subject study ID number 
• AE term(s), including serious criteria and onset date 
• Study treatment 
• Causality assessment  
Investigators should report SAEs as soon as they are determined to meet the definition, even 
if complete information is not yet available. In the rare event that the investigator does not become 
aware of the occurrence of SAE immediately (e.g., if a subject initially seeks treatment elsewhere), 
the investigator is to report the event within 24 hours after learning of it, and document the time 
of his/her first awareness of the SAE.  
All information about SAE should be promptly entered by study coordinators in the study 
database on AE pages of eCRFs. Source verification of the database AE information against SAE 
report forms will be performed by Criterium.  
An investigator may be requested by the Lead PI, medical monitor, Pfizer Inc., Seattle 
Genetics, Inc., or Criterium to obtain specific additional follow-up information in an expedited 
fashion. This information collected for SAEs is more detailed than that in the SAE form or in the 
AE pages in the CRFs. In general, this will include a description of the SAE in sufficient detail to 
allow for a complete medical assessment of the case and independent determination of possible 
causality. In the case of a subject death, a summary of autopsy findings (if available) must be 
submitted as soon as possible. Study investigators and Lead PI will assist Pfizer Inc. and Seattle 
Genetics, Inc. in investigating any SAE and will provide follow-up information reasonably 
requested by Pfizer Inc. and Seattle Genetics, Inc.. 
The SAEs that are subject to this reporting provision are those that occur from the day subject 
signs the informed consent form through 30 calendar days after the last administration of the study 
drugs. In addition, if an investigator becomes aware of an SAE occurring any time after the 
administration of the last dose of the study drugs, the investigator should report that SAE if he/she 
suspects a causal relationship between the drug products and the SAE. 
 
 
9.9.2 Non-serious adverse event reporting requirements 
Non-SAEs are to be reported on the AE page of the CRF. 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 86 of 115 
 
9.9.3 Events of special interest 
Several types of SAEs represent events of special interest on this clinical trial: 
• Left ventricular dysfunction or symptomatic CHF leading to a change of tucatinib dose 
or discontinuation of tucatinib treatment (as outlined in Section 8.1.3) 
• Liver toxicity meeting Hy’s law definition (as outlined in Section 8.1.4) 
• Any cerebral edema not clearly attributable to progression of disease (as outlined in 
Section 8.1.6) 
Left ventricular dysfunction or symptomatic CHF leading to a dose modification or 
discontinuation of tucatinib, liver toxicity meeting Hy’s law and grade 3 cerebral edema should 
follow SAE reporting requirements and be reported within 24hrs from the discovery of event. 
Grade 1 and 2 cerebral edema not clearly attributable to progression of disease must be reported 
within 72 hrs of the discovery of event. 
 
9.9.4 Pregnancy reporting requirements 
If a study participant becomes pregnant during administration of the drug, all study treatments 
must be discontinued. The investigator should report all pregnancies within 24 hours on the 
Pregnancy Reporting Form per the SAE reporting guidelines (section 9.9.1). The investigator will 
be asked for a follow up evaluation of the pregnancy, fetus, and child. Abortion, whether 
accidental, therapeutic, or spontaneous, should be reported as a SAE. Congenital anomaly or birth 
defects should also be reported as a SAE. All pregnancies will be monitored for the full duration; 
all perinatal outcomes should be reported. Infants should be followed for a minimum of 8 weeks 
and all neonatal outcomes should be reported. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 87 of 115 
 
 
10 CORRELATIVE STUDIES 
10.1 Background and rationale  
The 
study 
incorporates 
a 
correlative 
biomarker component using paired pre- and post-
treatment biopsy samples, as well as liquid biopsy, to 
explore sensitivity of tumors to triple combination 
therapy 
and 
putative 
resistance 
mechanisms 
potentially targetable with future drug combinations. 
Correlative studies will be centered on HER2, 
ERα and RB (cell cycle checkpoints) pathways (Fig. 
3). HER2/MAPK kinase signaling activates E2F 
transcription factors leading to transcription of cyclin 
D1 gene. Active ERα in complex with FOXA1 
transcription factor amplifies cyclin D1 transcription 
through an estradiol (E2)-responsive enhancer. Cyclin 
D1 couples with CDK4/6 and phosphorylates RB. 
P16 and other INK-family proteins inhibit cyclin D1 
– CDK4/6 complex, however, p16 is frequently 
inactivated in breast tumors [67]. Cyclin D1 increases 
transcriptional activity of ERα, providing a positive 
feedback loop. In addition to being catalytically 
active, the cyclin D1 – CDK4/6 complex sequesters 
the cell-cycle inhibitors p21 and p27, therefore 
promoting the activation of the cyclin E – CDK2 
complex 
further 
phosphorylating 
RB. 
Hyperphosphorylated RB loses its inhibitory effect on 
the E2F transcription program, allowing G1 to S transition [77, 78]. Because cyclin E itself is an 
E2F target gene, cyclin E may reinforce its own expression. Once cyclin E – CDK2 becomes 
active, RB phosphorylation is rendered partially independent of the mitogenic control that 
regulates cyclin D1 expression [79]. CDK2 phosphorylates ERα, further increasing ERα 
transcriptional activation [80].  
 
10.2 Potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to tucatinib 
In addition to cyclin E overexpression, an important mechanism of resistance to HER2-
targeted agents is activation of PI3K/AKT signaling, mediated by HER2 preferential dimerization 
partner HER3 [81]. Inhibition of HER2 by all currently approved HER2-targeted agents induces a 
robust increase in HER3 expression [81]. The HER3 protein tail has six PI3K-binding motifs, more 
than most kinases, and activation of HER3 leads to a robust PI3K pathway activation. Additiona lly, 
genetic or epigenetic events in PI3K subunits, PTEN or AKT may lead to the deregulation of this 
pathway and escape from HER2-blockade [81-83]. 
Little is known about HER2 gene mutations mediating resistance to HER2-targeted agents. 
The frequency of HER2 mutations in early stage HR+/HER2+ breast cancer is 4% (TCGA analysis 
March 26, 2016), however, the frequency of HER2 mutations in HR+/HER2+ metastatic disease 
is unknown. Several potentially important genetic alterations of HER2 have been described in pre-
clinical studies. L755S mutation produces lapatinib resistance. In-frame deletion of nucleotides 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 88 of 115 
 
755-759 in the HER2 gene, which is homologous to EGF receptor (EGFR) exon 19 in-frame 
deletions, leads to increased phosphorylation of EGFR or HER3 [84]. 
 
10.3 Potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to palbociclib 
Resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition may be mediated by overexpression of cyclin E – CDK2 
[85], which is also a mechanism of resistance to HER2 inhibitors [85] and letrozole [86]. Cyclin 
E overexpression occurs in 18-22% of breast carcinomas [87] and results from mutations in 
mitogenic pathways upstream of cyclin E [79], cyclin E gene (CCNE) amplification [88], or 
disrupted cyclin E ubiquitination and proteolysis [79, 89] mediated by Fbw7 tumor suppressor 
protein. Fbw7 inactivation could contribute to cyclin E overexpression. The prevalence of Fbw7 
gene mutations in breast tumors is not known, although it is recognized that loss of chromosome 
4q32 containing Fbw7 gene occurs in up to 30% of solid tumors [89]. 
Potential markers of sensitivity to CDK 4/6 inhibitors may include p16 inactivation, 
indicating tumor addiction to the RB pathway, and the presence of normal RB expression at 
baseline [20]. Tumors with RB loss are utilizing tumorigenic pathways other than cell cycle 
checkpoints. 
 
10.4 Potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to letrozole 
Many known mechanisms of letrozole resistance are linked to the activation of the RB 
pathway including cyclin D1 amplification or overexpression [90], activating mutations in CDK4 
gene, RB loss, p21 and p27 loss or abnormal cellular compartmentalization [90-92]. These 
mechanisms of resistance will be counteracted by co-administration of palbociclib. Upregulation 
of the HER2 pathway leads to endocrine resistance [93], however, this will be addressed by 
treatment with tucatinib. The remaining potential resistance mechanisms include cyclin E and C-
MYC overexpression [86, 90]. Besides, ESR1 mutations associated with constitutive ligand-
independent transcriptional activity of ERα (such as mutations in ESR1 ligand binding domain at 
positions L536, Y537, D351, D538), may lead to resistance to anti-hormonal therapy [94-96]. 
 
10.5 Assessment of potential biomarkers of sensitivity to the study drugs 
Summary of the potential mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to the study drugs is 
presented in Table 21.  
 
Table 21. Potential biomarkers of resistance and sensitivity to the study drugs 
 
Drug 
DNA level 
RNA / protein level 
Palbociclib 
Fwb7 mutations or LOH 
CCNE amplification 
CDK2 amplification 
Cyclin E overexpression 
RB loss 
P16 loss* 
Tucatinib 
HER2 mutations (L755S) 
PTEN mutations 
AKT mutations 
PI3K mutations 
CCNE amplification 
CDK2 amplification 
Cyclin E overexpression 
HER3 overexpression 
PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway activation 
through overexpression / increased 
phosphorylation 
Letrozole 
ESR1 mutations (L536, Y537, D351, D538) 
CCNE amplification 
CDK2 amplification 
Cyclin E overexpression 
C-MYC overexpression 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 89 of 115 
 
*p16 loss is a potential biomarker of sensitivity, all other alterations are potential biomarkers of 
resistance 
 
 
In the light of the above, we will plan to assess the most important potential biomarkers of 
resistance to combination therapy by IHC in FFPE tumor blocks obtained before treatment, on 
treatment and post-progression: cyclin E and CDK2 overexpression that could mediate resistance 
to all three targeted agents, RB loss (mediates resistance to palbociclib), p16 loss (potential marker 
of sensitivity to palbociclib), expression of HER3, AKT and phospho-AKT (markers of PI3K/AKT 
pathway activation associated with resistance to HER2-targeted agents). Additionally, PAM50 
tumor subtypes may be assessed and the results correlated with the efficacy of treatment. Other 
markers will be considered based on results and any advances in the field.  
 
Then we will apply a much broader approach to tumor expression profiling and mutational 
analysis, and perform mRNA sequencing with the goal to provide an unbiased approach and to 
capture both known and novel features. RNA expression and mutational profiles will be compared 
to reference normal values, then comparison will be performed in tumor biopsy pairs before and 
after treatment, and in responders versus non-responders. Pathway analysis will be performed, 
with particular attention to known alterations in ERα, HER2 / HER3 / MAPK, RB and PI3K 
pathways potentially associated with resistance to palbociclib, HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors 
and endocrine therapy.  
 
While tumor sequencing is very useful in studying tumorigenesis and therapeutic 
resistance, subjecting subjects to multiple invasive procedures could be a challenge, and ctDNA 
analysis, as well as analysis of other potential biomarkers (such as circulating tumor cells, 
exosomes, etc) by liquid biopsy represents an attractive alternative. Tumor ctDNA is fragmented 
to about 150 bp and present in only a few thousand copies per milliliter of blood. However, it is 
feasible to detect known mutations present at about 2% mutant allele frequency directly from 
plasma with sensitivity and specificity of more than 97% [97]. Therefore, we will perform 
exploratory analysis of ESR1 mutations (L536, Y537, D351, and D538) associated with endocrine 
resistance, and HER2 mutation L755S associated with resistance to HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors 
and other pertinent markers for resistance in ctDNA extracted from serum blood samples of study 
subjects before therapy, on therapy, and post progression. If specific resistance mutations are 
identified in tumor biopsies by RNA sequencing, ctDNA samples may be analyzed for the presence 
of these mutations. Additional analysis of other circulating markers potentially associated with 
cancer prognosis or outcomes from treatment (such as, for example, circulating tumor cells and 
exosomes) may be performed. 
 
 
Correlative studies may be modified to include other markers of interest as determined by novel 
publications and discoveries at the time when all biopsy and blood samples are collected. 
Correlative studies may be performed with various external institutions. For details on research 
blood and tissue collection, processing and shipment please see the Study Lab Manual. 
 
11 DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICAL METHODS 
11.1 Analytic plan for phase IB part of the study 
 
This is a multicenter, open-label, single arm study to determine safety and efficacy of the 
tucatinib in combination with palbociclib and letrozole in post-menopausal subjects with 
HR+/HER2+ locally advanced unresectable or  metastatic breast cancer. 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 90 of 115 
 
11.1.1 Analytic plan for primary endpoint 
The primary endpoint of the phase Ib part of this trial is safety and tolerability of 
combination therapy as evaluated by standard NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Interim safety analysis 
will be performed after 10 subjects are accrued to the Phase Ib and again after 20 subjects are 
accrued to the phase Ib prior to the initiation of phase II part. At these time, we will assess the 
proportion of subjects experiencing DLTs due to tucatinib and/or palbociclib as outlined in the 
section 4.2 “Safety analysis of the combination therapy” and below. 
Incidence, nature and severity of all adverse events (AEs) that occur on therapy will be 
analyzed. Safety will be considered clinically meaningfully altered if 60% or greater proportion of 
subjects had DLTs attributable to palbociclib, or 20% or greater proportion of subjects had DLTs 
attributable to tucatinib, or 50% or greater proportion of subjects had DLTs that could be 
potentially attributable to both drugs (Table 22).  
 
Table 22. Baseline toxicity rates and safety boundaries for palbociclib and tucatinib  
 
Drug 
Confidence 
level 
N* 
Baseline 
toxicity rate 
Safety 
boundary rate 
Upper limit 
CI 
n** 
palbociclib 
0.9 
10 
0.45 
0.6 
0.812 
8 out of 10 
20 
0.45 
0.6 
0.751 
15 out of 20 
tucatinib 
0.9 
10 
0.10 
0.2 
0.408 
4 out of 10 
20 
0.10 
0.2 
0.347 
7 out of 20 
both drugs 
0.9 
10 
ND*** 
0.5 
0.760 
8 out of 10 
20 
ND 
0.5 
0.694 
14 out of 20 
*N – total number of subjects; **n – number of subjects that had DLTs attributable to palbociclib 
and/or tucatinib that is set as safety boundary; ***ND – not determined 
 
To determine the safety of the triple combination, we will plan to enroll 10 subjects at the 
baseline starting doses of tucatinib 300mg PO BID, palbociclib 125mg PO daily 21 days on and 7 
days off, and letrozole 2.5mg PO daily on a 28 day cycle length (DL1). The safety monitoring plan 
and determination of any required dose de-escalations are outlined in section 4.2. 
 
In addition to the safety analysis, descriptive statistics will be used to summarize all subject 
characteristics and treatment administration/compliance. Safety will be evaluated through 
summaries of AEs, AEs will be classified by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term using 
the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA version 18.0); AE severities will be 
classified using the NCI CTCAE criteria version 4.03. In the event of multiple occurrences of the 
same AE with the same preferred term in one subject, the AE will be counted once as the 
occurrence. 
Collected AE data will be summarized in the following categories: 
• All AEs (regardless of grade) 
• All Grade 3/4/5 AEs 
• All drug-related AEs (regardless of grade) 
• All AEs leading to study drug or study discontinuations 
• All AEs of special interest (regardless of grade). These include LFT abnormalities, 
changes in cardiac ejection fraction, incidence of neutropenia and infections, and cerebral 
edema. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 91 of 115 
 
Additional data on extend of exposure, tolerability and compliance that aid in safety assessment 
will be collected: 
• Extend of exposure will be assessed by analyzing study drug administration data, any dose 
modifications or dose holdings will be flagged. For each of the regimen components 
(tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole), duration of exposure and number of treatment cycles 
will be summarized. 
• For each of the regimen components (tucatinib, palbociclib, letrozole), tolerability will be 
assessed by tabulating the frequency of study drug discontinuations. 
• For each of the regimen components (tucatinib, palbociclib, letrozole), treatment 
compliance (percent of actual to planned dosing) will be summarized. 
• Additionally, subjects who discontinue study drug prematurely or withdraw from the study 
will be summarized and listed, with the reason for early termination and/or withdrawal. 
Major protocol violations will be summarized. All non-protocol specified anti-cancer 
therapies will be listed and summarized. 
 
11.1.2 Analytic plan for secondary endpoints 
As the primary purpose of phase IB part of the study is to evaluate safety of the combination 
therapy, no specific statistical hypotheses testing in regard to secondary end-points (PK analysis 
and preliminary efficacy analysis) is planned.  
All subjects enrolled in phase IB part who complete at least one day of PK blood sampling 
will be included in the PK analyses. Plasma concentration/time data of the drugs obtained at the 
designated times will be summarized descriptively and presented graphically by dose and day of 
assessment. The concentration/time data will be analyzed using non-compartmental methods to 
obtain PK parameters in individual subjects. These PK parameters include the maximum plasma 
concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), area under the plasma 
concentration versus time curve to 24 hours (AUC24hr) and area under the plasma concentration 
versus time curve to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUClast). If data permits, area 
under the plasma concentration versus time curve to infinity (AUCinf), terminal elimination half-
life (t1/2), oral plasma clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) will be also 
estimated. Individual values and descriptive statistics of these PK parameters will be provided by 
dose and day of assessment in tabular form. Exploratory analyses investigating the relationship 
between computed PK parameters (e.g., Cmax, AUC24hrs) and tumor response will also be 
performed. 
For phase IB part of the study, anti-tumor efficacy is considered a secondary objective. All 
subjects who have received a minimum of 1 cycle of study treatment, had baseline assessments 
and at least one on-study tumor assessment will be considered evaluable for response.  
• For an individual subject, the best overall response to treatment is the best response 
recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking as a 
reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment 
started) or the withdrawal from the study. Stable disease will be considered the best 
response when observed for at least six months from baseline. 
• ORR (objective tumor response rate) is defined as the proportion of subjects that 
experience CR and PR based on RECIST 1.1 and/or RANO-BM criteria. 
• CBR (clinical benefit rate) is defined as proportion of subjects with CR, PR or SD, based 
on RECIST 1.1 and/or RANO-BM criteria.  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 92 of 115 
 
• DOR (duration of response) is defined as the time from enrollment into clinical trial until 
objective tumor progression or death whichever occurs first. 
• ORR will be reported as absolute number of subjects out of total number of subjects in the 
group. Descriptive summaries for ORR and DOR will be provided. 
• Overall CBR for all subjects enrolled in phase IB part of the study will be calculated and 
reported as percentage, 95% exact CI will be provided. 
 
11.2 Analytic plan for phase II part of the study 
This is an open-label single arm study to determine efficacy, further delineate safety 
profile, and to identify potential biomarkers of response to a combination treatment with tucatinib, 
palbociclib and letrozole in HR+/HER2+ subjects.  
 
11.2.1 Analytic plan for primary endpoint 
 
The primary efficacy endpoint for the phase II part of the study is PFS defined as the time 
from allocation to the first documented disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 (for subjects 
with CNS disease RECIST 1.1 and/or RANO-BM) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs 
first. If a subject does not have a documented date of progression or death, PFS will be censored 
at the date of the last adequate assessment. For PFS, Kaplan-Meier quartile estimates along with 
the 95% CI will be provided. 
Subjects from phase Ib and phase II parts of the study will be included into PFS analysis. 
PFS analysis will be performed both in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (all subjects enrolled 
in the study regardless of treatment received), as well as in treated population of subjects (all 
subjects who have received a minimum of 1 cycle of study treatment, had baseline assessments 
and at least one on-study tumor assessment). 
 
The study is designed to detect a 50% improvement in PFS on triple combination targeted 
therapy comparing to historical control. It is anticipated that 20 evaluable subjects in the phase Ib 
part and 20 subjects in the phase II part will be enrolled into this study. TH3resa study (TDM-1 
versus physician’s choice therapy) enrolled similar patient population [33, 34] and represent an 
appropriate study for comparison. TH3resa showed median PFS of 6.2 months in TDM-1 treatment 
arm. Using the survival analysis and assuming that the survival time is exponentially distributed, 
accrual time is 12 months, follow up time is 18 months, and drop out / loss of follow up rate is 5%, 
the sample size of 40 patients total (20 patients enrolled in phase Ib part, and 20 patients enrolled 
in phase II part) will allow us to achieve a statistical power of 82% with a one-sided type I error 
rate of 0.1 to detect 50% improvement in median PFS (from 6.2 month in the historical control 
[33, 34] to 9.3 months in the current study). 
 
11.2.2 Analytic plan for secondary endpoints 
Secondary end-points for the phase II part of the study include additional safety 
assessments (incidence, nature and severity of all AEs that occur on or after C1D1 of therapy), 
PKs, and evaluation of additional efficacy parameters (ORR, CBR and DOR). 
Safety will be evaluated through summaries of AEs; AEs will be classified by system organ 
class (SOC) and preferred term using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA 
version 18.0); AE severities will be classified using the NCI CTCAE criteria version 4.03. In the 
event of multiple occurrences of the same AE with the same preferred term in one subject, the AE 
will be counted once as the occurrence. 
Collected AE data will be summarized in the following categories: 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 93 of 115 
 
• All AEs (regardless of grade) 
• All grade 3/4/5 AEs 
• All drug-related AEs (regardless of grade) 
• All AEs leading to study drug or study discontinuations 
• All AEs of special interest (regardless of grade) – LFT abnormalities, changes in cardiac 
ejection fraction, incidence of neutropenia and infections, and cerebral edema.  
Additional data on extend of exposure, tolerability and compliance will be collected: 
• Extend of exposure will be assessed by analyzing study drug administration data, any dose 
modifications or dose holdings will be flagged. For each of the regimen components 
(tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole), duration of exposure and number of treated cycles 
will be summarized. 
• For each of the regimen components (tucatinib, palbociclib, letrozole), tolerability will be 
assessed by tabulating the frequency of study drug discontinuations.  
• For each of the regimen components (tucatinib, palbociclib, letrozole), treatment 
compliance (percent of actual to planned dosing) will be summarized. 
• Additionally, subjects who discontinue study drug prematurely or withdraw from the study 
will be summarized and listed, with the reason for early termination and/or withdrawal. 
Major protocol violations will be summarized. All non-protocol specified anti-cancer 
therapies will be listed and summarized. 
 
Additional PKs will be obtained for 10 patients enrolled in phase II part of the study. 
Plasma concentration/time data of the drugs obtained at the designated times will be summarized 
descriptively and presented graphically by dose and day of assessment. The concentration/time 
data will be analyzed using non-compartmental methods to obtain PK parameters in individua l 
subjects. These PK parameters include the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to 
maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), area under the plasma concentration versus time curve to 
24 hours (AUC24hr) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve to the time of the 
last measurable concentration (AUClast). If data permits, area under the plasma concentration 
versus time curve to infinity (AUCinf), terminal elimination half-life (t1/2), oral plasma clearance 
(CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) will be also estimated. Individual values and 
descriptive statistics of these PK parameters will be provided by dose and day of assessment in 
tabular form. Exploratory analyses investigating the relationship between computed PK 
parameters (e.g., Cmax, AUC24hrs) and tumor response may also be performed. 
Efficacy evaluation include assessment of ORR, CBR and DOR. Subjects from both phase 
I and phase II part of the study will be included into the analysis, and analysis will be performed 
in both intend to treat and treated population of subjects as it was previously described in section 
11.1.2.  
 
11.3 Early stopping rules 
There are no early stopping rules for futility, given the known activity of the standard and 
experimental drugs in this trial. Early stopping of the protocol for safety reasons could occur if the 
pre-planned safety analyses from the Phase IB portion of the study are not satisfactory or at any 
time during phase II if unexpected significant toxicities are identified which will be determined, if 
this unlikely event should occur, by input from the Lead PI, medical monitor, Pfizer Inc, Seattle 
Genetics, Inc. and/or the University of Colorado Cancer Center DSMC.  
 
11.4 Sample size justification 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 94 of 115 
 
 
The study is designed to detect a 50% improvement in PFS on triple combination targeted 
therapy comparing to historical control. It is anticipated that 20 evaluable subjects in the phase Ib 
part and 20 subjects in the phase II part will be enrolled into this study. TH3resa study (TDM-1 
versus physician’s choice therapy) enrolled similar patient population [33, 34] and represent an 
appropriate study for comparison. TH3resa showed median PFS of 6.2 months in TDM-1 
treatment arm. Using the survival analysis and assuming that the survival time is exponentially 
distributed, accrual time is 12 months, follow up time is 18 months, and drop out / loss of follow 
up rate is 5%, the sample size of 40 patients total (20 patients enrolled in phase Ib part, and 20 
patients enrolled in phase II part) will allow us to achieve a statistical power of 82% with a one-
sided type I error rate of 0.1 to detect 50% improvement in median PFS (from 6.2 month in the 
historical control [33, 34] to 9.3 months in the current study). 
 
12 DATA SAFETY MONITORING 
 
The Lead PI and/or Criterium will be responsible for clinical trial monitoring, overseeing 
the safety of the trial, including any specimens collected, executing the Data and Safety 
Monitoring (DSM) Plan, and overseeing the compliance with all reporting requirements to local 
and federal authorities. This will be accomplished through an additional oversight from the 
DSMC at the University of Colorado Cancer Center. The DSMC is responsible for ensuring 
data quality and study participant safety for all clinical studies at the University of Colorado 
Cancer Center, which is the coordinating institution of this trial. A summary of the DSMC’s 
activities is as follows: 
• Conduct of internal audits 
• Ongoing review of all SAEs, unanticipated problems (UAPs) and reportable AEs 
• Has the authority to close and/or suspend trials for safety or trial conduct issues 
• May submit recommendations for corrective actions to the CU Cancer Center’s 
Executive Committee 
Per the University of Colorado Cancer Center Institutional DSM Plan, SAEs, UAPs and 
reportable AEs are reported to the DSMC, COMIRB and the study sponsors per protocol. All 
SAEs, UAPs and reportable AEs are to be reported to the DSMC within 5 business days of the 
Lead PI receiving notification of the occurrence.  
 
The study Lead PI is responsible for organizing and conducting monthly teleconferences 
with all participating sites to discuss patients’ enrollment and safety of the trial. Each subject’s 
treatment outcomes, data regarding number of subjects, significant toxicities, dose modifications, 
and treatment responses will be discussed and documented in the meeting’s minutes. 
 
The Lead PI will provide a DSM report to the University of Colorado Cancer Center DSMC 
every six months including data from all participating sites. Criterium will assist in generating 
DSM report data from the study database. The DSM report will include a protocol summary; 
current enrollment numbers, summary of toxicity data to include specific SAEs, UAPs and AEs; 
any dose modifications; all protocol deviations and protocol amendments. The lead study PI is also 
responsible for overseeing the efficacy of the trial, therefore, the DSM report will include, if 
applicable, the results of any efficacy data analysis conducted. Results and recommendations 
from the review of this six month report by the University of Colorado Cancer Center DSMC will 
then be provided to the Lead PI in a DSMC review letter. The Lead PI is then responsible for 
ensuring this letter is provided to each participating site. Each participating site will be responsible 
for submitting the results and recommendations from the DSMC’s six month review to their IRB 
of record at the time of IRB continuing review per IRB policy. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 95 of 115 
 
13 QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 
13.1 Clinical site monitoring 
Remote site monitoring will be conducted to ensure that the rights and well-being of human 
subjects are protected, that the reported trial data are accurate, complete, verifiable, within protocol 
requirements, and congruent across the data, and that the conduct of the trial is in compliance with 
the currently approved protocol/ amendment(s), with GCP, and with applicable regulatory 
requirement(s). Site monitoring will be performed remotely by Criterium pursuant to the Remote 
Monitoring Plan (RMP), incorporated herein by reference. The RMP describes in detail who will 
conduct the remote monitoring, at what frequency monitoring will be done, at what level of detail 
monitoring will be performed, and the distribution of the monitoring reports/summary Note to 
Files. Independent audits may be conducted by the University of Colorado Cancer Center DSMC 
to ensure safety of the clinical trial participants and consistency of clinical trial procedures and 
data collection across all participating sites. In addition, audits may be conducted at any time by 
appropriate regulatory authorities and/or the IRBs. 
 
13.2 Quality control (QC) procedures 
 
Quality Control (QC) procedures will be implemented beginning with the data entry system 
and data QC checks that will be run as the database will be generated. Any missing data or data 
anomalies will be communicated to the site(s) for clarification/ resolution. 
 
Following written SOPs, the study monitor will verify that the clinical trial is conducted 
and data are generated, documented (recorded), and reported in compliance with the protocol, 
GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirements (e.g., Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), Good 
Manufacturing Practices (GMP)). 
The investigational site will provide direct access to all trial-related sites, source data/ 
documents, and reports for the purpose of monitoring and, if needed, auditing by the DSMC audit 
team, and inspection by local and regulatory authorities. 
 
14 DATA HANDLING AND RECORD KEEPING 
14.1 Case Report Forms/Electronic data record 
The term case report form (CRF) should refer to either a paper form or an electronic data 
record or both. A CRF is required and should be completed for each included subject. The 
completed original CRFs are property of the University of Colorado Denver, Lead PI and 
appropriate regulatory authorities. It is the investigator's responsibility to ensure completion and 
to review and approve all CRFs. CRFs must be signed by the investigator or by an authorized staff 
member. These signatures serve to attest that the information contained on the CRFs is true. At all 
times, the investigator has final personal responsibility for the accuracy and authenticity of all 
clinical and laboratory data entered on the CRFs. Subject source documents are the physician's 
patient records maintained at the trial site.  
 
14.2 Record retention 
As described in the ICH GCP Guidelines, “essential documents”, including CRFs or 
eCRFs, source documents, Informed Consent Forms (ICFs), laboratory test results and the 
investigational product inventory records should be retained by the investigator until at least two 
years after the last approval of a marketing application in an ICH region and until there are no 
pending or contemplated marketing applications in an ICH region or at least two years have 
elapsed since the formal discontinuation of clinical development of the investigational product. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 96 of 115 
 
These documents should be retained for a longer period however if required by the applicable 
regulatory requirements or by an agreement with Pfizer and/or Seattle Genetics, Inc.. 
Government agency regulations and directives require that all study documentation 
pertaining to the conduct of a clinical trial be retained by the Investigator until notified by Pfizer 
and Seattle Genetics, Inc. in writing that retention is no longer necessary. These records must be 
made available at reasonable times for inspection and duplication, if required, by a properly 
authorized representative of the US FDA, European Competent Authorities, and Health Canada 
(HC) in accordance with regulatory requirements.  
To protect the safety of study subjects and to ensure accurate, complete, and reliable data, 
the investigator will keep records of laboratory tests, clinical notes, and subject medical records in 
the subject files as original source documents. If requested, the Investigator will provide Pfizer 
and Seattle Genetics, Inc., applicable regulatory agencies, and applicable IRB/IEC with direct 
access to the original source documents. Records containing subject medical information must be 
handled by the Investigator in accordance with the required privacy policies and consistent with 
the terms of the subject authorization contained in the informed consent document for the study. 
Care should be taken to ensure that such records are not shared with any person or for any purpose 
not contemplated by the authorization. Furthermore, eCRFs and other documents to be transferred 
to Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Inc. or their designee should be completed in strict accordance with the 
instructions regarding the coding of subject identities. No study document should be destroyed 
without prior written agreement between Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Inc. and the investigator. Should 
the investigator wish to assign the study records to another party or move them to another location, 
written approval must be obtained from Pfizer and Seattle Genetics, Inc.. The Investigator must 
keep these documents on file according to local regulations after completion or discontinuation of 
the study. After that period of time the documents may be destroyed, subject to local regulations.  
Should the Investigator wish to assign the study records to another party or move them to 
another location, Pfizer and Seattle Genetics, Inc. must be notified in advance. If the Investigator 
cannot guarantee this archiving requirement at the investigational site for any or all of the 
documents, special arrangements must be made between the investigator and Pfizer and Seattle 
Genetics, Inc. to store these in a sealed container(s) outside of the site so that they can be returned 
sealed to the investigator in case of a regulatory audit. Where source documents are required for 
the continued care of the subject, appropriate copies should be made before storing outside of the 
site. 
 
15 ETHICS 
15.1 Institutional Review Board (IRB) 
The trial protocol, 
protocol amendments, informed consent form(s), and other relevant 
documents (i.e., recruitment materials, and all subject materials) will be submitted to each site’s 
designated IRB for review and approval. Approval of both the protocol and the consent form must 
be obtained before any subject is enrolled at the site. Any amendment to the protocol will require 
review and approval by the site’s IRB before the changes are implemented to the study. All 
changes to the consent form will require the site’s IRB approval and determination whether 
previously consented subjects need to be re-consented to an amended consent form. All 
correspondence with the IRB should be retained in the site’s Investigator File. The only 
circumstance in which an amendment may be initiated prior to IRB approval is where the change 
is necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subjects. In that event, the site 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 97 of 115 
 
investigator must notify the Lead PI and their IRB in writing within 5 working days after the 
implementation. 
 
15.2 Ethical conduct of the trial 
The trial will be performed in accordance with the protocol, and applicable federal, state and 
local regulatory requirements and laws. 
 
15.3 Subject information and consent 
The informed consent process will be initiated prior to the individual’s agreeing to participate 
in the study and continues throughout the individual’s study participation. All parties will ensure 
protection of subject personal data and will not include subject names on any forms, reports, 
publications, or in any other disclosures. The informed consent form (ICF) will be approved by 
the site’s IRB and must be in compliance with regulatory and legal requirements. The 
investigator must ensure that each trial subject, or his/her legally authorized representative is 
fully informed about the nature and objectives of the trial. The investigator will discuss the risks 
and possible benefits of study participation in detail with subjects and their families. 
The investigator, or a person designated by the investigator, will obtain written informed 
consent from each subject or, if permitted by state laws, the subject's legally 
authorized 
representative, before any trial-specific activity is performed. The informed consent form used 
in this trial and any changes made during the course of the trial must be prospectively approved by 
the IRB before use. The investigator will retain the original of each subject's signed consent form. 
 
16 DEFINITION OF END OF TRIAL 
End of trial is defined as the time at which: 
• Enrollment is completed according to protocol planned sample size, and assessment and 
requirements are completed as per protocol 
• The stated objectives of the trial are achieved 
• 
Premature termination of this clinical trial may occur because of a regulatory authority 
decision, change in opinion of the IRB/IEC, drug safety problems, or at the discretion of 
Lead PI, Criterium, Pfizer, Inc. or Seattle Genetics, Inc. 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 98 of 115 
 
17 REFERENCES 
 
1. 
Slamon, D.J., et al., Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with 
amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science, 1987. 235(4785): p. 177-82. 
2. 
Prat, A. and J. Baselga, The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-
receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2. Nat Clin Pract Oncol, 2008. 
5(9): p. 531-42. 
3. 
Cortes, J. and J. Baselga, How to treat hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal 
growth factor receptor 2-amplified breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(33): p. 5492-4. 
4. 
Montemurro, F., S. Di Cosimo, and G. Arpino, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 
2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: new insights into 
molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol, 2013. 24(11): p. 2715-24. 
5. 
Benz, C.C., et al., Estrogen-dependent, tamoxifen-resistant tumorigenic growth of MCF-7 
cells transfected with HER2/neu. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 1992. 24(2): p. 85-95. 
6. 
Pietras, R.J., et al., HER-2 tyrosine kinase pathway targets estrogen receptor and 
promotes hormone-independent growth in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene, 1995. 
10(12): p. 2435-46. 
7. 
Shou, J., et al., Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance: increased estrogen receptor-
HER2/neu cross-talk in ER/HER2-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2004. 
96(12): p. 926-35. 
8. 
Wang, Y.C., et al., Different mechanisms for resistance to trastuzumab versus lapatinib 
in HER2-positive breast cancers--role of estrogen receptor and HER2 reactivation. 
Breast Cancer Res, 2011. 13(6): p. R121. 
9. 
Montemurro, F., et al., Hormone-receptor expression and activity of trastuzumab with 
chemotherapy in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients. Cancer, 2012. 118(1): 
p. 17-26. 
10. 
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer, version 4.2017. 2017. 
11. 
Arpino, G., et al., Treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-
overexpressing breast cancer xenografts with multiagent HER-targeted therapy. J Natl 
Cancer Inst, 2007. 99(9): p. 694-705. 
12. 
Kaufman, B., et al., Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the 
treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-
positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the 
randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(33): p. 5529-37. 
13. 
Johnston, S., et al., Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as 
first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast 
cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2009. 27(33): p. 5538-46. 
14. 
Finn, R.S., et al., PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially 
inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cell lines 
in vitro. Breast Cancer Res, 2009. 11(5): p. R77. 
15. 
Musgrove, E.A. and R.L. Sutherland, Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in 
breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 2009. 9(9): p. 631-43. 
16. 
Witkiewicz, A.K., D. Cox, and E.S. Knudsen, CDK4/6 inhibition provides a potent 
adjunct to Her2-targeted therapies in preclinical breast cancer models. Genes Cancer, 
2014. 5(7-8): p. 261-72. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 99 of 115 
 
17. 
Cadoo, K.A., A. Gucalp, and T.A. Traina, Palbociclib: an evidence-based review of its 
potential in the treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press), 2014. 6: p. 
123-33. 
18. 
Yu, Q., Y. Geng, and P. Sicinski, Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1 
ablation. Nature, 2001. 411(6841): p. 1017-21. 
19. 
Choi, Y.J., et al., The requirement for cyclin D function in tumor maintenance. Cancer 
Cell, 2012. 22(4): p. 438-51. 
20. 
Finn, R.S., et al., The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination 
with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, 
HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 
study. Lancet Oncol, 2015. 16(1): p. 25-35. 
21. 
Nikolai, B.C., et al., HER2 Signaling Drives DNA Anabolism and Proliferation through 
SRC-3 Phosphorylation and E2F1-Regulated Genes. Cancer Res, 2016. 76(6): p. 1463-
75. 
22. 
Oncothyreon Investigator’s Brochure. Investigational Product - ONT-380. 2014. 
23. 
Ferrario, C., et al., ONT-380 in the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer central nervous 
system (CNS) metastases (mets). J Clin Oncol, 2015. 33 (suppl; abstr 612). 
24. 
Hamilton, E., et al., Phase 1b study of ONT-380, an oral HER2-specific inhibitor, in 
combination with capecitabine (C) and trastuzumab (T) in third line treatment of HER2+ 
metastatic breast cancer (MBC). . J Clin Oncol, 2015. 33 (suppl., abstr. 602). 
25. 
Borges, V.F., et al., Abstract A050: ARRY-380, an oral HER2 inhibitor: Final phase 1 
results and conclusions. Molecular Cancer Research, 2013. 11(10 Supplement): p. A050. 
26. 
Eisenhauer, E.A., et al., New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised 
RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer, 2009. 45(2): p. 228-47. 
27. 
Lin, N.U., et al., Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the 
RANO group. Lancet Oncol, 2015. 16(6): p. e270-8. 
28. 
FDA. Palbociclib (Ibrance) -Full Prescribing Information 2015. 
29. 
Hammond, M.E., et al., American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American 
Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen 
and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2010. 28(16): p. 2784-95. 
30. 
Wolff, A.C., et al., Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 
testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American 
Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2014. 138(2): p. 
241-56. 
31. 
Rimawi, M., et al., First-Line Trastuzumab Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor, With or Without 
Pertuzumab, in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive and Hormone 
Receptor–Positive Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (PERTAIN): A 
Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018. 36(28): p. 
2826-2835. 
32. 
Martin, M., et al., A phase two randomised trial of neratinib monotherapy versus 
lapatinib plus capecitabine combination therapy in patients with HER2+ advanced 
breast cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2013. 49(18): p. 3763-72. 
33. 
Krop, I.E., et al., Trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician's choice for 
pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (TH3RESA): a randomised, open-
label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2014. 15(7): p. 689-99. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 100 of 115 
 
34. 
Krop, I.E., et al., Trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician's choice in 
patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (TH3RESA): 
final overall survival results from a randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 
2017. 18(6): p. 743-754. 
35. 
Freedman, R.A., et al., TBCRC 022: Phase II trial of neratinib + capecitabine for 
patients (Pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) breast cancer 
brain metastases (BCBM). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017. 35(15_suppl): p. 1005-
1005. 
36. 
Montemurro, F., et al., Abstract P1-12-10: Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine 
(T-DM1) in 399 patients with central nervous system metastases: Exploratory subgroup 
analysis from the KAMILLA study. Cancer Research, 2017. 77(4 Supplement): p. P1-12-
10-P1-12-10. 
37. 
Cancer Facts and Figures. 2015. 
38. 
Owens, M.A., B.C. Horten, and M.M. Da Silva, HER2 amplification ratios by 
fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort 
of 6556 breast cancer tissues. Clin Breast Cancer, 2004. 5(1): p. 63-9. 
39. 
Slamon, D.J., et al., Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for 
metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med, 2001. 344(11): p. 783-
92. 
40. 
Verma, S., et al., Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N 
Engl J Med, 2012. 367(19): p. 1783-91. 
41. 
Baselga, J., et al., Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast 
cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(2): p. 109-19. 
42. 
Xia, W., et al., A model of acquired autoresistance to a potent ErbB2 tyrosine kinase 
inhibitor and a therapeutic strategy to prevent its onset in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad 
Sci U S A, 2006. 103(20): p. 7795-800. 
43. 
Collins, D.C., et al., Growth factor receptor/steroid receptor cross talk in trastuzumab-
treated breast cancer. Oncogene, 2015. 34(4): p. 525-30. 
44. 
Guarneri, V., et al., Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary 
chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. J Clin Oncol, 
2006. 24(7): p. 1037-44. 
45. 
Gianni, L., et al., Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in 
women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer 
(NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2012. 
13(1): p. 25-32. 
46. 
Baselga, J., et al., Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer 
(NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet, 2012. 
379(9816): p. 633-40. 
47. 
Untch, M., et al., Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant 
anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 
3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2012. 13(2): p. 135-44. 
48. 
Prat, A., et al., Research-based PAM50 subtype predictor identifies higher responses and 
improved survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer in the NOAH study. Clin 
Cancer Res, 2014. 20(2): p. 511-21. 
49. 
Buzdar, A.U., et al., Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-75) followed 
by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab versus paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC-75 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 101 of 115 
 
plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer 
(Z1041): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2013. 14(13): p. 1317-
25. 
50. 
Rimawi, M.F., et al., Multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant lapatinib and 
trastuzumab with hormonal therapy and without chemotherapy in patients with human 
epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: TBCRC 006. J Clin 
Oncol, 2013. 31(14): p. 1726-31. 
51. 
Ellis, M.J., et al., Estrogen-independent proliferation is present in estrogen-receptor 
HER2-positive primary breast cancer after neoadjuvant letrozole. J Clin Oncol, 2006. 
24(19): p. 3019-25. 
52. 
Viale, G., et al., Central Review of ER, PgR and HER2 in BIG 1-98 Evaluating Letrozole 
vs. Letrozole Followed by Tamoxifen vs. Tamoxifen Followed by Letrozole as Adjuvant 
Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast 
Cancer. Cancer Research, 2009. 69(24 Supplement): p. 76. 
53. 
Dowsett, M., et al., Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or 
the combination: influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer--a study from 
the IMPACT trialists. J Clin Oncol, 2005. 23(11): p. 2477-92. 
54. 
Lipton, A., et al., Serum HER-2/neu and response to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole 
versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol, 2003. 21(10): p. 1967-72. 
55. 
Lipton, A., et al., Elevated serum Her-2/neu level predicts decreased response to 
hormone therapy in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2002. 20(6): p. 1467-72. 
56. 
Houston, S.J., et al., Overexpression of c-erbB2 is an independent marker of resistance to 
endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 1999. 79(7-8): p. 1220-6. 
57. 
Martin, M.B., et al., A role for Akt in mediating the estrogenic functions of epidermal 
growth factor and insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinology, 2000. 141(12): p. 4503-11. 
58. 
Turner, N.C., et al., Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. 
N Engl J Med, 2015. 373(3): p. 209-19. 
59. 
Hamilton, E., et al., A phase 1b study of ONT-380, an oral HER2-specific inhibitor, 
combined with capecitabine and/or trastuzumab, in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer 
(MBC). Cancer Research, 2015. 75: p. 4-15-19. 
60. 
Arias-Romero, L.E., et al., Pak1 kinase links ErbB2 to beta-catenin in transformation of 
breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res, 2013. 73(12): p. 3671-82. 
61. 
Borges, V.F., et al., Tucatinib Combined With Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine in Advanced 
ERBB2/HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 1b Clinical Trial. JAMA 
Oncol, 2018. 4(9): p. 1214-1220. 
62. 
Murthy, R., et al., Tucatinib with capecitabine and trastuzumab in advanced HER2-
positive metastatic breast cancer with and without brain metastases: a non-randomised, 
open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol, 2018. 19(7): p. 880-888. 
63. 
Dickson, C., et al., Amplification of chromosome band 11q13 and a role for cyclin D1 in 
human breast cancer. Cancer Lett, 1995. 90(1): p. 43-50. 
64. 
Arnold, A. and A. Papanikolaou, Cyclin D1 in breast cancer pathogenesis. J Clin Oncol, 
2005. 23(18): p. 4215-24. 
65. 
Rayess, H., M.B. Wang, and E.S. Srivatsan, Cellular senescence and tumor suppressor 
gene p16. Int J Cancer, 2012. 130(8): p. 1715-25. 
66. 
Bosco, E.E. and E.S. Knudsen, RB in breast cancer: at the crossroads of tumorigenesis 
and treatment. Cell Cycle, 2007. 6(6): p. 667-71. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 102 of 115 
 
67. 
Geradts, J. and P.A. Wilson, High frequency of aberrant p16(INK4A) expression in 
human breast cancer. Am J Pathol, 1996. 149(1): p. 15-20. 
68. 
Herman, J.G., et al., Hypermethylation-associated inactivation indicates a tumor 
suppressor role for p15INK4B. Cancer Res, 1996. 56(4): p. 722-7. 
69. 
Zhao, J., R. Pestell, and J.L. Guan, Transcriptional activation of cyclin D1 promoter by 
FAK contributes to cell cycle progression. Mol Biol Cell, 2001. 12(12): p. 4066-77. 
70. 
Assoian, R.K. and E.A. Klein, Growth control by intracellular tension and extracellular 
stiffness. Trends Cell Biol, 2008. 18(7): p. 347-52. 
71. 
Castro-Rivera, E., I. Samudio, and S. Safe, Estrogen regulation of cyclin D1 gene 
expression in ZR-75 breast cancer cells involves multiple enhancer elements. J Biol 
Chem, 2001. 276(33): p. 30853-61. 
72. 
Koehler, M., et al., Mechanism of action for combined CDK4/6 and ER inhibition in ER 
positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol, 2014. 25 (suppl 1): i21. 
73. 
Thangavel, C., et al., Therapeutically activating RB: reestablishing cell cycle control in 
endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2011. 18(3): p. 333-45. 
74. 
FDA. Guidance for Industry - Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical 
Evaluation. 2013. 
75. 
Dieras, V., et al., Long-term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination With 
Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2018. 
76. 
Carlson, J.A., et al., Trastuzumab emtansine and stereotactic radiosurgery: an 
unexpected increase in clinically significant brain edema. Neuro Oncol, 2014. 16(7): p. 
1006-9. 
77. 
Wang, L., et al., Pharmacologic inhibition of CDK4/6: mechanistic evidence for selective 
activity or acquired resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 2007. 110(6): p. 2075-
83. 
78. 
Shapiro, G.I., Cyclin-dependent kinase pathways as targets for cancer treatment. Journal 
of Clinical Oncology, 2006. 24(11): p. 1770-1783. 
79. 
Hwang, H.C. and B.E. Clurman, Cyclin E in normal and neoplastic cell cycles. 
Oncogene, 2005. 24(17): p. 2776-86. 
80. 
Zhou, W., et al., ERalpha, SKP2 and E2F-1 form a feed forward loop driving late 
ERalpha targets and G1 cell cycle progression. Oncogene, 2014. 33(18): p. 2341-53. 
81. 
Amin, D.N., et al., Chemical probing of HER2-amplified cancer cells identifies TORC2 
as a particularly effective secondary target for combination with lapatinib. Oncotarget, 
2015. 6(38): p. 41123-33. 
82. 
Campbell, M.R. and M.M. Moasser, HER Targeting in HER2-Negative Breast Cancers: 
Looking for the HER3 Positive. Clin Cancer Res, 2015. 21(13): p. 2886-8. 
83. 
Amin, D.N., et al., Resiliency and vulnerability in the HER2-HER3 tumorigenic driver. 
Sci Transl Med, 2010. 2(16): p. 16ra7. 
84. 
Bose, R., et al., Activating HER2 mutations in HER2 gene amplification negative breast 
cancer. Cancer Discov, 2013. 3(2): p. 224-37. 
85. 
Shapiro, G., Beyond CDK 4/6: Targeting additional cell cycle and transcriptional CDKs 
in breast cancer. Cancer Res, 2016. 76(4 Suppl, Abst MS1-1). 
86. 
Akli, S., et al., Low-molecular-weight cyclin E can bypass letrozole-induced G1 arrest in 
human breast cancer cells and tumors. Clin Cancer Res, 2010. 16(4): p. 1179-90. 
87. 
Keyomarsi, K., et al., Cyclin E, a potential prognostic marker for breast cancer. Cancer 
Res, 1994. 54(2): p. 380-5. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 103 of 115 
 
88. 
Keyomarsi, K. and A.B. Pardee, Redundant cyclin overexpression and gene amplification 
in breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1993. 90(3): p. 1112-6. 
89. 
Welcker, M. and B.E. Clurman, FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the 
crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat Rev Cancer, 2008. 8(2): p. 83-
93. 
90. 
Venditti, M., et al., C-myc gene expression alone is sufficient to confer resistance to 
antiestrogen in human breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer, 2002. 99(1): p. 35-42. 
91. 
Caldon, C.E., et al., Cyclin E2 overexpression is associated with endocrine resistance but 
not insensitivity to CDK2 inhibition in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther, 
2012. 11(7): p. 1488-99. 
92. 
Clarke, R., J.J. Tyson, and J.M. Dixon, Endocrine resistance in breast cancer - An 
overview and update. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2015. 418 Pt 3: p. 220-34. 
93. 
Brodie, A., et al., Model systems: mechanisms involved in the loss of sensitivity to 
letrozole. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2005. 95(1-5): p. 41-8. 
94. 
Merenbakh-Lamin, K., et al., D538G mutation in estrogen receptor-α: a novel 
mechanism for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Cancer research, 2013. 
73(23): p. 6856-6864. 
95. 
Robinson, D.R., et al., Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast 
cancer. Nature genetics, 2013. 45(12): p. 1446-1451. 
96. 
Jeselsohn, R., et al., Emergence of constitutively active estrogen receptor-α mutations in 
pretreated advanced estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 
2014. 20(7): p. 1757-1767. 
97. 
Forshew, T., et al., Noninvasive Identification and Monitoring of Cancer Mutations by 
Targeted Deep Sequencing of Plasma DNA. Science Translational Medicine, 2012. 
4(136): p. 136ra68-136ra68. 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 104 of 115 
 
18 APPENDIX 
18.1 Appendix A: List of abbreviations 
 
Abbreviation 
Term 
AE 
Adverse Event 
AI 
Aromatase Inhibitor 
ALT 
Alanine Aminotransferase 
ANC 
Absolute Neutrophil Count  
ASCO 
American Society of Clinical Oncology 
AST 
Aspartate Aminotransferase 
AUC 
Area Under the Curve 
BID 
Twice a Day 
CABG 
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft 
CAP 
College of American Pathologists  
CBR 
Clinical Benefit Rate 
C1D1 
Cycle 1 Day 1 
CDK 
Cyclin Dependent Kinase 
CHF 
Congestive Heart Failure 
Cmax 
Maximum plasma Concentration 
CMP 
Clinical Monitoring Plan 
CNS 
Central Nervous System 
COMIRB 
Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board 
CR 
Complete Response  
CRF 
Case Report Form  
CT 
Computer Tomography 
ctDNA 
Circulating Tumor DNA 
DL 
Dose Level 
DOR 
Duration of Response 
DSM 
Data Safety Monitoring 
DSMC 
Data Safety Monitoring Committee 
ECHO 
Echocardiogram  
ECOG 
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 
EGFR 
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 
EKG (ECG) 
Electrocardiogram 
ER 
Estrogen receptor 
ERα 
Estrogen receptor alpha 
ESR1 
Estrogen receptor gene 
FDA 
Food and Drug Administration 
FFPE 
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded  
IC50 
Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration 
ICF 
Informed Consent Form 
IHC 
Immunohistochemistry 
IHC GCP 
International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 105 of 115 
 
INR 
International Normalized Ratio 
IRB 
Institutional Review Board 
ISH 
In Situ Hybridization 
HER 
Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 
HR 
Hormone Receptor 
hERG (assay) 
Either-a-go-go Related Gene Assay 
LFTs 
Liver Function Tests 
LVEF 
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction  
MeDRA 
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities  
MRI 
Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
MTD 
Maximum Tolerated Dose 
MUGA (scan) 
Multiple Gated Acquisition Scan 
NCI CTCAE 
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse 
Events 
ORR 
Overall Response Rate 
OS 
Overall Survival 
pCR 
Pathologic Complete Response 
PD 
Progressive disease 
PET 
Positron Emission Tomography  
PFS 
Progression Free Survival 
PI 
Principle Investigator 
PIC 
Powder in Capsule 
PK 
Pharmacokinetics 
PO 
Orally 
PR 
Progesterone Receptor 
PR 
Partial Response  
PS 
Performance Status 
PT 
Prothrombin Time 
PTCA 
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty 
PTT 
Partial Thromboplastin Time 
QTc 
Corrected QT Interval 
Rb 
Retinoblastoma (protein) 
RECIST 
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 
RP2D 
Recommended Phase 2 Dose 
SAE 
Serious Adverse Event 
SD 
Stable Disease 
SNV 
Single Nucleotide Variant 
SOC 
System Organ Class 
TEAE 
Treatment Emergent Adverse Event 
TTP 
Time to Progression 
UAP 
Unanticipated Problem 
UGT1A1 
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1  
ULN 
Upper Limit of Normal 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 106 of 115 
 
 
 
18.2 Appendix B: Performance status 
 
ECOG Performance Status Scale 
Karnofsky Performance Scale 
Grade 
Descriptions 
Percent 
Description 
0 
Normal activity.  Fully active, able to 
carry on all pre-disease performance 
without restriction. 
100 
Normal, no complaints, no evidence 
of disease. 
90 
Able to carry on normal activity; 
minor signs or symptoms of disease. 
1 
Restricted 
in 
physically 
strenuous 
activity, but ambulatory and able to 
carry out work of a light or sedentary 
nature (light housework, office work). 
80 
Normal activity with effort; some 
signs or symptoms of disease. 
70 
Cares for self, unable to carry on 
normal activity or to do active work. 
2 
In bed <50% of the time.  Ambulatory 
and capable of all self-care, but unable 
to carry out any work activities.  Up and 
about more than 50% of waking hours. 
60 
Requires occasional assistance, but is 
able to care for most of his/her needs. 
50 
Requires considerable assistance and 
frequent medical care. 
3 
In bed >50% of the time.  Capable of 
only limited self-care, confined to bed 
or chair more than 50% of waking 
hours. 
40 
Disabled, requires special care and 
assistance. 
30 
Severely 
disabled, 
hospitalization 
indicated.  Death not imminent. 
4 
100% bedridden.  Completely disabled. 
Cannot carry on any self-care.  Totally 
confined to bed or chair. 
20 
Very sick, hospitalization indicated. 
Death not imminent. 
10 
Moribund, 
fatal 
processes 
progressing rapidly. 
5 
Dead. 
0 
Dead. 
 
18.3 Appendix C: RECIST 1.1 criteria, RANO-BM criteria and bi-compartmental 
assessment of response 
18.3.1 RECIST criteria for solid tumors version 1.1 
 
Selected sections from RECIST 1.1 criteria for solid tumors are provided below. For 
detailed guidelines, see complete RECIST 1.1 criteria [26]. 
 
Measurability of Tumor Lesions at Baseline 
Definitions 
At baseline, tumor lesions will be categorized as follows: measurable (lesions that can be 
accurately measured in at least one dimension [longest diameter to be recorded] as 20 mm with 
Xray, 10 mm by caliber on physical exam, or 10 mm with CT scan) or non-measurable (all other 
lesions, including small lesions and truly non-measurable lesions). To be considered pathologically 
enlarged and measurable, a lymph node must be at least 15 mm in short axis when assessed by CT 
scan. All measurements should be recorded in metric notation by use of a ruler or calipers. All 
UTI 
Urinary Tract Infection 
WBC 
White Blood Cell Count 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 107 of 115 
 
baseline evaluations should be performed as closely as possible to the beginning of treatment and 
never more than 4 weeks (approximately 30 days) before the beginning of treatment. Lesions 
considered to be truly non-measurable include the following: bone lesions, leptomeningeal disease, 
ascites, pleural/pericardial effusion, inflammatory breast disease, lymphangitis cutis / pulmonis, 
and abdominal masses identified by physical exam that are not confirmed by reproducible imaging 
techniques. Note: Tumor lesions that are situated in a previously irradiated area are usually 
considered non-measurable, unless there has been a demonstrated progression in the area. 
 
Specifications by Methods of Measurements 
 
The same method of assessment and the same technique should be used to characterize 
each identified and reported lesion at baseline and during follow-up. Imaging-based evaluation is 
preferred to evaluation by clinical examination when both methods have been used to assess the 
anti-tumor effect of a treatment.  
• Clinical Examination – clinically detected lesions will be considered measurable only when 
they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For the case of skin 
lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate the size of the 
lesion, is required. 
• Chest X-ray – lesions on chest X-rays are acceptable as measurable lesions when they are 
clearly defined and surrounded by aerated lung. 
• CT and MRI – CT and MRI are the best currently available and most reproducible methods 
for measuring target lesions selected for response assessment. RECIST 1.1 guideline has 
deﬁned measurability of lesions on CT scan based on the assumption that CT slice 
thickness is 5 mm or less. When CT scans have slice thickness greater than 5 mm, the 
minimum size for a measurable lesion should be twice the slice thickness.  
• Ultrasound is not useful in assessment of lesion size and should not be used as a method of 
measurement. Ultrasound examinations cannot be reproduced in their entirety for 
independent review at a later date and, because they are operator dependent, it cannot be 
guaranteed that the same technique and measurements will be taken from one assessment 
to the next. 
• Endoscopy and Laparoscopy – the utilization of these techniques for objective tumor 
evaluation is not advised. However, such techniques can be useful in confirming complete 
histopathologic response when biopsy specimens are obtained. 
• Tumor Markers – tumor markers alone cannot be used to assess response. However, if 
markers are initially above the upper normal limit, they must return to normal levels for a 
subject to be considered in complete clinical response when all tumor lesions have 
disappeared. 
 
Tumor Response Evaluation 
Baseline Evaluation 
Assessment of Overall Tumor Burden and Measurable Disease: 
 
To assess objective response, it is necessary to estimate the overall tumor burden at baseline 
to which subsequent measurements will be compared. Measurable disease is defined by the 
presence of at least one measurable lesion. If the measurable disease is restricted to a solitary 
lesion, its neoplastic nature should be confirmed by cytology/histology.  
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 108 of 115 
 
Baseline Documentation of “Target” and “Non-target” Lesions: 
 
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, 
representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions and recorded and 
measured at baseline. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (those with the 
longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging 
techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameters for all target lesions will be calculated 
and reported as the baseline sum of the longest diameters. To calculate the sum of the longest 
diameters of all target lesions, add up longest diameters of non-nodal target lesions (axial plane), 
and add short axis diameters of target lymph nodes. The baseline sum of the longest diameters will 
be used as the reference by which to characterize the objective tumor response. All other lesions 
(or sites of disease) should be identified as non-target lesions and should be recorded at baseline. 
Measurements of these lesions are not required, but the presence or absence of each should be 
noted throughout follow-up. 
 
Response Criteria 
Evaluation of Target Lesions: 
• CR—the disappearance of all target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target 
or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. 
• PR—at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking 
as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters; 
• PD—at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as 
reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since the treatment started or 
the appearance of one or more new lesions. The sum of the longest diameters must also 
demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm (ex.: two lesions increasing from 2 mm 
to 3 mm do not qualify). The appearance of one or more new lesions is PD. 
• SD—neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for 
PD, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters since the treatment 
started. 
 
Evaluation of Non-target Lesions:  
• CR—the disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. 
All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis) 
• Non-CR / Non-PD – persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or the maintenance 
of tumor marker level above the normal limits 
• PD—the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing 
non-target lesions. Note: disease progression based on progression of “non-target” lesions 
only is exceptional. In this setting, there must be an overall level of substantial worsening 
in non-target disease such that, even in presence of SD or PR in target disease, the overall 
tumor burden has increased sufﬁciently to merit discontinuation of therapy. A modest 
increase in the size of one or more non-target lesions is usually not sufﬁcient to quality for 
unequivocal progression status. Appearance of the new lesions will signify PD.  
 
Evaluation of Best Overall Response: 
 
The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of treatment until 
disease progression/recurrence (taking as a reference for PD and SD the smallest measurements 
recorded since the treatment started). The table below provides overall responses for all possible 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 109 of 115 
 
combinations of tumor responses in target and non-target lesions with or without the appearance 
of new lesions. 
 
Overall responses for all possible combinations of tumor responses in target and non-target 
lesions with or without the appearance of new lesions  
 
Target Lesions 
Non-target Lesions 
New Lesions 
Overall Response 
CR 
CR 
No 
CR 
CR 
Non-CR / Non-PD 
No 
PR 
PR 
Non-CR / Non-PD 
No 
PR 
SD 
Non-CR / Non-PD 
No 
SD 
PD 
Any 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
PD 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Yes 
PD 
CR – complete response; PR – partial response; SD – stable disease; PD – progressive disease 
 
18.3.2 RANO-BM criteria 
 
Selected sections from RANO-BM criteria are provided below. For detailed instructions, 
see published guidelines [27]. 
 
CNS vs. non-CNS assessments: Assignment of CNS response and progression is 
independent of non-CNS response and progression. Non-CNS response and progression will be 
assessed by RECIST 1.1. Assessment of CNS response and progression will be per the RANO-
BM criteria. At each assessment point where a CNS assessment occurs, the MRI brain should be 
coincident with a corresponding non-CNS assessment. 
 
Measurable lesions: Up to five measureable CNS lesions may be identified as target 
lesions. A sum of longest diameters for all target lesions will be recorded at baseline and at each 
subsequent measurement. Definition of measurable disease: 
• Contrast enhancing lesion that can be measured accurately in at least one dimension with 
a minimum size of 10 mm, and visible in 2 or more axial slices that are ≤5 mm apart with 
0 mm skip  
• The diameter perpendicular to the longest diameter must be ≥5 mm  
• Cysts and surgical cavities are not measurable unless there is a nodular component 
measuring ≥10 mm in the longest diameter and ≥5 mm in the perpendicular plane 
• Lesions previously treated with local therapy (SRS, WBRT, or surgery) may only be 
considered measurable if progression has occurred since the time of local treatment. If 
lesions are present which have not been treated previously with local therapy, these are 
preferred target lesions  
• All other lesions should be considered non-measurable and listed as non-target lesions, 
including dural metastases, bony skull metastases, and cystic-only lesions. At each 
assessment, these should be classified as present (Non-CR / Non-PD), absent (CR), or 
unequivocal progression. 
 
Lesions < 5 mm: For measurable lesions responding to therapy which are sufficiently 
small (but still present) to be assigned an exact measure, a default value of 5 mm should be 
recorded. If a lesion disappears, the value should be recorded as 0 mm. 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 110 of 115 
 
 
Coalescence of lesions: Lesions might coalesce during treatment. As lesions coalesce, a 
plane between them may be maintained that would aid in obtaining maximum longest diameter of 
each individual lesion. If the lesions have truly coalesced such that they are no longer separable, 
the vector of the longest diameter in this instance should be the maximum longest diameter for the 
coalesced lesion. 
 
New lesions: The finding of a new CNS lesion should be unequivocal and not due to 
technical or slice variation. A new lesion is one that was not present on prior scans. If the MRI is 
obtained with slice thickness of 1.5 mm or less, the new lesion should also be visible in axial, 
coronal, and sagittal reconstructions of 1.5 mm or thinner projections. If a new lesion is equivocal, 
for example because of its small size (i.e., ≤5 mm), continued therapy can be considered, and a 
follow-up assessment will clarify if it really is new disease. If repeated scans confirm a new lesion, 
progression should be declared using the date of the initial scan showing the new lesion. 
 
Treatment effect from radiation or surgery and pseudo-progression: this applies to 
subjects who have been treated with radiation or surgery, for whom there has been radiographic 
evidence of enlargement of target or non-target lesions, which do not necessarily represent tumor 
progression. If radiographic evidence of progression exists, but clinical evidence indicates that the 
radiological changes are due to treatment effect (and not to progression of cancer), additional 
evidence is needed to distinguish between true progression and treatment effect, in which a single 
MRI alone is insufficient. Subjects can be continued on protocol therapy pending further 
investigation as follows: 
• The scan can be repeated at the next protocol-scheduled assessment or sooner, and 
generally within about 6 weeks. An investigator can choose a shorter time interval if 
progressive symptoms or other clinical concerns arise. 
• Continued tumor growth on follow up MRI is consistent with PD, in which case the subject 
should go off study. The date of progression will be the date of the initial scan where 
progression was suspected. 
• Stabilization and shrinkage of a lesion can be consistent with treatment effect, in which 
case the subject can stay on study. 
• For subjects with equivocal results even on the next restaging scan, the scan can be repeated 
again at a subsequent protocol-scheduled assessment or sooner. Equivocal scans must all 
initially be recorded as “not evaluable”. 
 
Corticosteroid use: In the absence of clinical deterioration related to the tumor, an 
increase in corticosteroid dose alone should not be used as a sole determinant of progression. 
Subjects with stable imaging results and whose corticosteroid dose has increased for reasons other 
than clinical deterioration related to the tumor do not qualify as having progression. These subjects 
should be observed closely, and if their corticosteroid dose can be reduced back to baseline, they 
may be considered evaluable for response, but if further clinical deterioration related to the tumor 
becomes apparent, they will be considered as having clinical progression. The definition of clinical 
deterioration is left to the discretion of the treating physician. For subjects who initiate or increase 
the dose of corticosteroids but who are not considered to have clinical or radiographic progression, 
scans taken during the use of corticosteroids in this scenario are not evaluable for response at that 
time point. 
 
Response assessment of target and non-target lesions 
Confirmatory scans are required at a minimum of 4 weeks after initial scan. 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 111 of 115 
 
Target lesions 
CR – disappearance of all CNS target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; with no new lesions, 
no use of corticosteroids, and subject is stable or improved clinically. 
PR – at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of CNS target lesions, taking as 
a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; 
stable to decreased corticosteroid dose, stable or improved clinical condition. 
PD – at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of CNS target lesions, taking as 
a reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on 
study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, at least one lesion must increase by an absolute 
value of 5 mm or more to be considered progression. 
SD – neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking 
as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters while on study. 
 
Non-target lesions 
Non-target lesions should be assessed qualitatively at each of the time points per protocol. 
CR – requires all of the following: disappearance of all enhancing CNS non-target lesions, no new 
CNS lesions. 
Non-CR / Non-PD – persistence of one or more non-target CNS lesions. 
PD – any of the following: unequivocal progression of existing enhancing non-target CNS lesions, 
new lesion(s), or unequivocal progression of existing tumor-related non-enhancing (T2/FLAIR) 
CNS lesions.  
 
Summary of the Response Criteria for CNS Metastases by RANO-BM 
 
CR 
PR 
SD 
PD 
Target lesions 
None 
≥ 30% decrease in 
sum of the longest 
diameters relative 
to baseline 
< 30% decrease 
relative to baseline 
but < 20% increase 
in sum of the 
longest diameter 
relative to nadir 
≥ 20% increase in 
sum of the longest 
diameters relative to 
nadir; at least one 
lesion must increase 
by an absolute value 
of 5mm or more 
Non-target 
lesions 
None 
Non-CR / Non-PD 
Non-CR / Non-PD 
Unequivocal PD 
New lesions 
None 
None 
None 
Present 
Corticosteroids 
None 
Stable or 
decreased  
Stable or 
decreased 
Not applicable* 
Clinical status 
Stable or 
improved 
Stable or improved 
Stable or improved 
Worse 
Requirement 
for response 
All 
All 
All 
Any 
* Increase in corticosteroids alone will not be taken into account in determining progression in 
the absence of persistent clinical deterioration. 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 112 of 115 
 
18.3.3 Bi-compartmental (CNS and non-CNS) response assessment 
CNS (RANO-BM) Non-CNS (RECIST 1.1) 
Response 
CR, PR or SD 
CR, PR or SD 
Record as CNS and non-CNS CR, PR or SD 
CR, PR or SD 
PD 
Record as CNS CR, PR or SD; record as 
non-CNS PD 
PD 
SR, PR or SD 
Record as CNS PD; record as non-CNS SR, 
PR or SD 
PD 
PD  
Record as both CNS and non-CNS PD 
 
18.3.4 Bi-compartmental progression-free survival 
CNS (RANO-BM) 
Non-CNS 
(RECIST 1.1) 
Bi-compartmental 
PFS 
Note 
CR, PR or SD 
PD 
Record as PFS event 
Record as non-CNS PD 
PD 
CR, PR or SD 
Record as PFS event 
Record as CNS PD 
PD 
PD 
Record as PFS event 
Record as both CNS 
and non-CNS PD 
 
 
In this trial, if a subject is found to have progressive disease due to CNS progression per 
RANO-BM, but does not have progressive disease outside the CNS per RECIST 1.1, the subject 
may undergo local therapy (radiotherapy or surgery) to the progressive CNS lesion(s), and 
continue on study after discussion with and approval from the medical monitor. The subject may 
continue on study until a second progressive disease event occurs (either CNS or non-CNS).  
 
18.4 Appendix D: List of prohibited medications and medication that require caution 
It is recommended that concomitant medication check will be performed by a clinical 
pharmacist prior to subject enrollment in the trial to verify that subject is not taking any 
concomitant medication that belongs to the groups of prohibited medications listed in the 
Appendix D.  
The following medications are prohibited during the entire study period and within 5 
elimination half-lives prior to first dose of study treatment: 
• strong CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors (potential interaction with tucatinib and 
palbociclib) 
• strong CYP2C8 inducers or inhibitors (potential interaction with tucatinib) 
• moderate CYP2C8 inhibitor trimethoprim (prohibited due to prior adverse events on a 
clinical trial when used in combination with tucatinib) 
 
 CYP3A STRONG INDUCERS (PROHIBITED) 
 Carbamazepine (Tegretol®)  
 Phenobarbital  
 Phenytoin (Dilantin®) 
 Rifampin 
 St. John's Wort 
 
 
 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 113 of 115 
 
CYP3A STRONG INHIBITORS (PROHIBITED) 
Clarithromycin  
Conivaptan  
Diltiazem   
Fluvoxamine  
Grapefruit Juice (in large amounts, > 1 liter a day, and in high concentrations) 
Itraconazole  
Ketoconazole  
Nefazodone  
Posaconazole  
Quinupristin  
Telithromycin  
Troleandomycin  
Voriconazole  
Verapamil 
Cranberries/cranberry juice 
 
 CYP2C8 STRONG INDUCERS (PROHIBITED) 
Rifampin 
 
CYP2C8 STRONG INHIBITORS (PROHIBITED) 
Gemfibrozil 
Montelukast 
Quercetin 
Rosiglitazone 
Clopidogrel 
 
CYP2C8 MODERATE INHIBITOR (PROHIBITED) 
Trimethoprim 
 
The following medications should be used with caution during the study period: 
• Moderate inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 (potential interaction with tucatinib and 
palbociclib) 
• Moderate inhibitors of CYP2C8 other than trimethoprim (potential interaction with 
tucatinib) 
• Sensitive substrates of CYP3A4 (potential interaction with tucatinib). Avoid concomitant 
use of sensitive CYP3A4 substrates with tucatinib when possible, consider using an 
alternate medication which is not a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. If the use of additional 
sensitive CYP3A substrates is unavoidable, consider dose reduction of CYP3A4 substrates 
with narrow therapeutic indices and/or increased monitoring for potential adverse reactions 
as described in the medication's prescribing information. 
• Inhibitors or substrates of P-gp (potential interaction with tucatinib) 
• Substrates of BCRP (potential interaction with tucatinib) 
• Sensitive substrates of UGT1A1 (potential interaction with tucatinib) 
 
  

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 114 of 115 
 
 CYP3A MODERATE INDUCERS 
Bosentan  
Modafinil (Provigil®)  
Nafcillin 
 
CYP3A MODERATE INHIBITORS 
Aprepitant (Emend®) 
Cimetidine 
Ciprofloxacin (Cipro®) 
Clotrimazole 
Cyclosporine  
Dronedarone (Multaq®)  
Erythromycin  
Fluconazole (Diflucan®)  
Tofisopam 
 
CYP2C8 MODERATE INHIBITORS 
Deferasirox 
Teriflunomide 
 
 SENSITIVE CYP3A SUBSTRATES 
 Alfetanil 
 Apixaban (Eliquis) 
 Avanafil 
 Budesonide 
 Buspirone 
 Conivaptan 
 Darifenacin 
 Dronedarone 
 Ebastine 
 Eletriptan 
 Eplerenone 
 Felodipine 
 Lurasidone 
 Lomitapide 
Lovastatin 
 Lurasidone 
 Midazolam 
 Naloxegol 
 Nisoldipine 
 Quetiapine 
 Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) 
 Sildenafil 
 Simvastatin 
 Ticagrelor 
 Tolvaptan 

PI: Elena Shagisultanova     COMIRB#16-1661, Criterium# 17BR01 
Version date 3.23.2020 
Page 115 of 115 
 
 Triazolam 
 Vardenafil 
 
Many anti-HIV and anti-Hep C medications are strong or moderate inhibitors or inducers or 
sensitive substrates of CYP3A, they are not included in this list because patients with chronic 
hepatitis and HIV are excluded this study.  
  
INHIBITORS OF P-GP 
Quinidine 
Reserpine 
 
SUBSTRATES OF P-GP 
Dabigatran (Pradaxa) 
Digoxin 
Fexofenadine 
Loperamide 
Quinidine 
 
SUBSTRATES OF BRCP 
Dantrolene 
Rosuvastatin 
Prazozin 
Sulfasalazine 
 
SENSITIVE SUBSTRATES OF UGT1A1 
Irinotecan is a sensitive substrate of UGT1A1; however, it will not be used in this study 
(prohibited as one of anti-cancer agents) 
 
 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form
Page 1 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Principal Investigator:
Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
COMIRB No:
16-1661
CRITERIUM No:
17BR01
Version Date:
March 19, 2020
Study Title: 
PHASE IB/II OPEN-LABEL SINGLE ARM STUDY TO 
EVALUATE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUCATINIB IN 
COMBINATION WITH LETROZOLE AND PALBOCICLIB IN 
SUBJECTS WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE AND 
HER2-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
You are being asked to be in a research study. This form provides you with information 
about the study. A member of the research team will describe this study to you and answer 
all of your questions. Please read the information below and ask questions about anything 
you do not understand before deciding whether or not to take part. 
Why is this study being done?
This study plans to learn more about the combination therapy of tucatinib with palbociclib 
and letrozole and how these drugs work together to treat your type of cancer. Letrozole has been 
approved as standard treatment for metastatic breast cancer by the U.S. Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA). Palbociclib has been approved by the FDA for treatment of hormone receptor 
positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer, but has not yet been approved for patients with HR+ and 
HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Tucatinib has not been approved for combination treatment of 
Palbociclib and letrozole in metastatic breast cancer patients. However, Tucatinib has been 
approved for combination treatment with trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with advanced 
unresectable or metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. This is considered an “Investigational” study 
because this combination of drugs has not been approved by the FDA. The purpose of this 
study is to evaluate the safety and how well the study drugs are tolerated when given in 
combination.
You are being asked to be in this research study because you have been diagnosed with 
HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.
Throughout the rest of this form, when these drugs are referenced by themselves they will 
be called tucatinib, palbociclib and letrozole, but when referenced together in combination 
use will be called the “study drug(s)”.
COMIRB
Approved for
RECONSENT
25-Jun-2020
09-Jun-2021

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 2 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Other people in this study
This study has two parts. The first part is a dose escalation, also called Phase Ib. The 
second part is an expansion, also called Phase II. These parts will be described in the next 
section of this consent form.
Up to 25 people from around the country will participate in the Phase II part of this study. 
Up to 50 people from around the country will participate in both parts of the study. 
What happens if I join this study?
If you join the study, you will be asked to sign this consent form. You will be given a copy 
to keep and the original form will be kept at the clinic. You can withdraw from the study at 
any time and without giving a reason. This will not affect the standard medical care you 
receive. 
The two parts to this study are:
Part I - Phase Ib
Dose de-escalation group (cohort) – This part of the study has already taken place.
The goal of this part of the study was to see how safe tucatinib is when taken in 
combination with palbociclib and letrozole. 
Part II – Phase II
Expansion group (cohort) – In this part of the study we will use the doses of the 
study drugs determined from Part I. We will further study how effective this 
combination of study drugs may be in treating HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast 
cancer. 
By signing this consent form, you will be taking part in Phase II of this study, which has 
three (3) sections:
1. Before starting the study (Screening)
2. During the Study (Treatment)
3. Completion of Study (End of Treatment and Follow-up)
There are also optional parts of this study. These optional procedures are voluntary and 
are not required. You can still take part in the main study if you choose not to take part in 
the optional study procedures. You will be given the choice later in this consent form to 
decide if you would like to take part in these optional procedures.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 3 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
This next section is an overview of what will be expected of you, and what you can expect 
if you take part in this study. 
Study Procedures:
Below are the study procedures and schedule of events (when each procedure will take 
place) for the dose expansion group (Part II) of this study. Some procedures you receive 
while taking part in this study are “standard of care procedures” for treatment of your 
disease. If you have had some of these procedures recently, they may not need to be 
repeated. Some procedures are required only for this research study and will be called 
“research” procedures. The time points when these study procedures will take place are 
specified in the next section called “Study Visits”.

Informed Consent  
This informed consent form will be discussed with you and you will be given a copy 
of this document. If you join the study, you will be asked to sign this consent form 
before you receive any study related tests or procedures for Part II. 

Medical and Cancer History 
Before you start the study, we will record your date of birth, race, ethnicity, and 
complete medical history. This medical history will look at the background and 
history of your cancer and any treatments you have received for your disease. 

Physical Examination
A physical examination will be completed as part of your standard of care at 
screening and throughout the duration of the study. After you join the study, we will 
assess if the study drugs are is affecting your body functions including lungs, heart, 
abdomen, extremities, skin, head (eyes, ears, nose, hair, etc.) and your neurological 
function.  

Tumor Tissue Samples
o
Archived Tissue.  If you had surgery for your cancer in the past, you must 
agree to allow us to contact the institution where you had your surgery and 
ask them to send us a portion of your tumor tissue that they have stored so 
we may use it for this research.  
o
Tumor tissue biomarker testing during the study.  
We will ask you to allow us to take a fresh biopsy of your tumor tissue and 
keep it for research. There are three optional tumor biopsies in this study: 
(1) prior to the start of treatment, 
(2) after completion of the first 28 days of treatment, and 
(3) at the end of the study. 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 4 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
This is a voluntary part of this study, and you will be given the option later in 
this consent form to take part, or not take part, in this optional procedure. 

Blood and Urine Samples
These tests are sometimes called safety labs so the study doctor can be sure it is 
safe for you to take part in this study and to be given the study drugs.  These tests 
will include some standard of care tests and some research tests: 
o
Pregnancy test (women who are able to become pregnant).  A positive 
pregnancy test prior to being given the study drugs, will exclude you from 
starting or continuing to take part in the study. 
o
Complete blood count (CBC)
o
Comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP)
o
Blood clotting tests (PT/INR, and PTT) 
o
Biomarker blood test. This research test will look at how and if your cancer is 
responding to the treatment.
Depending on when you are enrolled into the study, you may be required to do 
additional blood tests on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 2 Day 9. Your doctor will let you 
know if you will doing a pharmacokinetic test described below:
o
Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood test. This is a research related test that will allow 
us to see how long the study drugs remain in your body. 
o
If you are required to take a PK blood test, you will be asked to have a high 
protein/high calorie meal (such as half and half, cream, high fat yogurt, 
butter, ice-cream, cheese or cream cheese) at 8 PM before taking palbociclib 
at 10 PM on a day prior to PK testing days.
o
Prior to PK blood test on Cycle 1 Day 9, you will not be allowed to take one 
of the study medications (tucatinib), but will be taking palbociclib and 
letrozole.
o
You will start tucatinib on Day 9 of Cycle 1 after PK blood tests are 
completed. 
Table 1 below provides detailed information on the timing of these tests if you are 
required to have the PK tests.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 5 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Table 1. Schedule of pharmacokinetic assessments
Cycle 
Day 
Time point
1
1-8
Participant takes only palbociclib and letrozole. Tucatinib is on hold.
1
8
Participant eats high calorie/high protein meal at 8 PM and takes 
palbociclib at 10 PM in the evening. Letrozole can be taken any time 
during the day. Record the timing of drug administration in drug diary. 
1
9
~8 AM: blood draw
~11 AM: blood draw
~2 PM: blood draw
~5 PM: blood draw
1
9
After completion of PKs, participant begins taking tucatinib and 
continues taking palbociclib and letrozole.
2
8
Participant eats high calorie/high protein meal at 8 PM and takes 
palbociclib at 10 PM in the evening. Letrozole can be taken any time 
during the day. Record the timing of drug administration in drug diary.
2
9
~8 AM: blood draw
~11 AM: blood draw
~2 PM: blood draw
~5 PM: blood draw
Your doctor may order additional blood tests that he/she feels are needed to plan 
treatment, dose modification, or further evaluations.

Electrocardiogram (ECG) 
This non-invasive procedure records the electrical activity of the heart. Electrodes 
are placed on the skin of the chest and connected in a specific order to a machine. 
Output usually appears on a long scroll of paper that displays a printed graph.  This 
will check electrical activity of your heart.

Echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multigated Acquisition (MUGA) Scan
This is a noninvasive scan of the heart using sound waves. This test will be used to 
see how well your heart pumps blood.  

Vital Signs 
We will take your blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and 
weight. Height will be measured only during screening.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 6 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Performance Status  
We will assess how well you are performing your daily activities.

Other Medications
Your study doctor will let you know which other medications you can and cannot 
take while taking part in this study.  You should check with your doctor before taking 
any new medications.  From the time you first receive the study drugs through 30 
days after the last dose, we will record other medications you may be taking. 

Review of the Adverse Events (AEs)
Some risks have been identified because of the disease process or through use of 
the study drugs. These are commonly called side effects and will be followed very 
closely by your doctor and the study staff. More information about these will be 
provided in the Risk section of this consent form. 
Study Visits:
1.  SCREENING
After signing this consent form you will have the following done to see if you can be 
in this study:

Review your medical and cancer history

ECHO or MUGA scan of your heart

Physical exam

Vital signs 

Performance status

Blood tests:
o
Complete blood count (CBC) including types – white cells, red cells and 
platelets (differential) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP)
o
Blood clotting (PT/INR and PTT) – research
o
Pregnancy (women of childbearing potential)
o
Biomarker blood sample – research

Review of medications you are taking

ECG – research 

Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor burden. This 
may include diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan to document the 
locations of the cancer in your body. It may also include a brain MRI, if one is 
necessary.

Tumor tissue collections of archived biopsies – research

Tumor tissue biopsy - optional research procedure

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 7 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
You do not have to have this procedure if you do not want to. You will be 
given the choice later in this consent form to decide if you want to take part in 
this part of the study. 
If the procedures above show that you are eligible to participate in the study, you will 
undergo the following procedures while on treatment.
2.  TREATMENT
Cycle 1 Day 1

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Physical examination

Vital signs 

Performance status

Blood tests – CBC with differential and CMP

Begin treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – research 

You will be given a drug diary to complete – research 
Cycle 1 Day 8

Preparation for PK Test (if required) – research
Cycle 1 Day 9

PK Test (if required) – research
Cycle 1 Day 15 

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Vital signs 

Blood tests – CBC with differential

Review drug diary – research 

Continue treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – 
research 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 8 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Cycle 2 Day 1 

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Physical examination

Vital signs

Performance status

Blood tests 
o
CBC with differential and CMP
o
Biomarker blood sample – research

Review drug diary from previous cycle – research 

Treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – research 

You will be given a new drug diary to complete – research 

Tumor tissue biopsy - optional research procedure
This procedure can be performed at any time during cycle 2.  You do not 
have to have this procedure if you do not want to. You will be given the 
choice later in this consent form to decide if you want to take part in this part 
of the study. 
Cycle 2 Day 8

Preparation to PK Test (if required) – research
Cycle 2 Day 9

PK Test (if required) – research
Cycle 2 Day 15 

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Vital signs

Blood tests - CBC with differential

Review drug diary – research 

Continue treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – 
research 
Cycle 3+ Day 1 

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Physical examination

Vital signs

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 9 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Performance status

Blood tests – CBC with differential and CMP

Review drug compliance from previous cycle and drug diary

Administer treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit

You will be given a new drug diary to complete
Additional Study Procedures
While you are on this study, you will also have the following procedures done at 
regular time points.

Once every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks (6 cycles), then once every 12 
weeks: Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor 
burden. This may include diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan to 
document the locations of the cancer in your body. It may also include a 
brain MRI, if one is necessary.

Once every 12 weeks: ECHO or MUGA scan
3.  COMPLETION OF STUDY – (End of treatment and Follow-up)
You will need to return to clinic for a follow-up study visit if your disease gets worse, 
if you decide to withdraw from the study, or if you start a different anticancer 
therapy.
  
The following will be performed if not already performed in the prior week. 

Review of AEs

Review of  medications you are taking

Review drug compliance from previous cycle and drug diary

Vital signs

Physical exam

Performance status

Blood tests
o
CBC with differential and CMP
o
Additional biomarker blood sample  – research

Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor burden. This 
may include diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan to document the 
locations of the cancer in your body. It may also include a brain MRI, if one is 
necessary.

Tumor tissue biopsy - optional research procedure  

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 10 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
You do not have to have this procedure if you do not want to. You will be 
given the choice later in this consent form to decide if you want to take part in 
this part of the study. 
You will also need to return to the clinic for an additional safety follow-up visit in 
about 30 days after you stop treatment with the study drugs.  This visit will include:

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Vital signs

Physical exam

Performance status

Blood tests – CBC with differential, CMP and liver function tests
How long will I be on the study?
You may take part in this study for as long as you tolerate the study tests, procedures, and 
study treatments and your disease is stable or improving. You will continue to receive 
treatment with the study drugs until your disease progresses or you have an unacceptable 
drug-related side effect.
What are the possible discomforts or risks?
As with any study drug, side effects may occur when taking this study drug. While taking 
part in this study, and being treated with the study drugs, you will be watched carefully for 
any side effects. Some side effects may go away after you stop taking the study drug. 
Some side effects can be long lasting and may never go away or may even lead to death. 
You should talk to your study doctor about any side effects or discomfort you may have. 
The study doctor may give you some medicine that will help with some side effects. The 
study doctor may also interrupt or discontinue the study drug. 
You will be notified by your study doctor of any new side effects seen in other patients that 
occur during the time you are on the study. This may affect you wanting to continue in this 
research study. 
You should avoid drinking grapefruit juice in large amounts (>34 oz. or 1 L)  and eating 
cranberries or drinking cranberry juice while participating in this study as it could affect how 
your body metabolizes the drugs.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 11 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
You may experience risks or discomforts when taking part in this study, which include 
some that are common such as low blood cell counts, infections, gastrointestinal (stomach 
and intestines) symptoms, fever, and fatigue, some that are rare, such as life-threatening 
infections and sepsis, and some that are unknown at this time. This is not a complete list of 
risks or discomforts. A comprehensive list of risks and discomforts is provided later in this 
consent document.
Palbociclib has been given to approximately 1,674 patients with breast cancer who 
received palbociclib together with hormonal treatment in Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials.
Serious and life-threatening infections have been observed in some patients treated with 
palbociclib.
In a rat study where palbociclib was administered for the lifespan of the rat, microglial cell 
(a type of cell located in the central nervous system) tumors were seen at blood 
concentrations higher than those used to treat humans. It is currently unknown what these 
findings observed only in male rats means for patients treated with palbociclib over time. 
Based on animal studies and prior human studies with the study drugs, and/or other 
studies with similar types of drugs, side effects or discomforts you may experience while in 
this study include:
Risks of the Study Drugs:
Tucatinib
Common - in more than 20 out of 100 people

Diarrhea

Dizziness

Fatigue

Nausea

Rash

Weakness
Less Common - in 1 to 20 people out of 100 people

Pain in the abdomen (belly pain)

Alkaline phosphatase elevation

Constipation

Cough

Creatinine increase (decreased kidney function)

Headache

Pain in arms or legs

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 12 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Chest pain

Muscle pain

Shortness of breath/difficulty breathing

Potentially life-threatening abnormal liver function tests (hepatitis)

Anemia (low hemoglobin), which may make you feel tired or weak

Decreased appetite

Low sodium, potassium, magnesium and phosphate levels, or level of 
other electrolytes in your body

Bilirubin elevation (break down of red blood cells)

Leg swelling

Vomiting

Infection in the nose, sinuses or throat (upper respiratory tract infection). 
You may have fever, pain, or a hard time breathing.

Heavy sweating while sleeping (night sweats)

Back pain

Infection that could cause frequent and painful urination (urinary tract 
infection)
Rare - in fewer than 1 out of 100 people

Weakness of the heart muscle (heart failure)

EKG changes (change in your heart’s electrical activity)/QT prolongation 
(takes heart longer than normal to recharge during beats)/irregular 
heartbeat/palpitations

Dehydration
Most Important Side Effects -

Liver Function Problems
Some participants who took tucatinib had problems with their liver. Your 
doctor will run tests to check that your liver is working properly during 
your treatment with tucatinib. Your doctor may change your tucatinib 
dose based on the test results.

Diarrhea
Tucatinib can cause severe watery poop (diarrhea). If you have watery 
poop, tell your doctor right away. Your doctor may change your tucatinib 
dose if you have watery poop.

Kidney Function Problems
Some participants who got tucatinib had higher creatinine levels. This 
could mean that there are problems with your kidneys. If this happens, 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 13 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
it’s usually within the first treatment cycle. Participants who have had 
increased levels of creatinine had these levels stay increased while they 
were getting treated. The levels went back down after treatment stopped.

Interactions with Other Medications 
Tucatinib may change how your body reacts to some other drugs, which 
could stay in your body longer than usual. While you are taking part in 
this study, you might need to stop some medications or replace them 
with other medications. If you can’t stop taking these medications, your 
doctor might need to change how much you take. Your doctor might also 
need to watch your health more closely while you are taking part in this 
study.
Palbociclib
More Common - in more than 30 out of 100 people

Decrease in neutrophil blood cells (may increase the risk for infection)

Decrease in white blood cell count (infection fighting cells)

Infections, including serious bacterial or viral infections or reactivation of 
previous infections

Feeling tired or fatigued
Common - in 10 to 30 out of 100 people

Anemia (low hemoglobin), which may make you feel tired or weak

Low platelet count, which may increase your risk of bleeding or bruising

Inflammation or sores of the mouth or throat, which may make it difficult 
to talk, eat, or swallow

Diarrhea

Constipation

Nausea

Vomiting

Joint pain

Back pain

Pain in the hands and feet

Hair loss

Rash

Cough

Shortness of breath

Headache

Decreased appetite

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 14 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Hot Flush

Dizziness

Inability to sleep (insomnia)

Common Cold

Fever
Less Common - in 5 to less than 10 people out of 100 people

Abdominal pain

Indigestion

Dry mouth

Weakness (asthenia)

Swelling of the hands and feet

Irritation or sores in the lining of hollow organs like mouth, throat, 
stomach, or bowels

Pain

Influenza- (flu-) like illness

Muscle pain

Pain in the muscles and bone including around the chest and neck

Muscle cramps

Increases in blood liver markers that may indicate liver damage, including 
potentially life threatening liver damage

Dry skin

Itching

Mouth or throat pain

Nosebleeds

Impaired sense of taste

Depression

Falls

Anxiety

Increased blood pressure

Heartburn (acid reflux)

Increased creatinine levels that could indicate abnormal kidney function
Rare - in less than 5 out of 100 people

Fever associated with a dangerously low level of a type of white blood cell 
counts (neutrophils)

Blurred vision

Dry eyes or watery eyes

Interstitial lung disease / pneumonitis (an inflammation of the lungs which 
can cause cough and shortness of breath)

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 15 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Letrozole
Common - in more than 20 out of 100 people

Hot flashes or feeling flushed

Joint pain or arthritis

Mood swings

Pain in the muscles

Dryness in the vaginal area
Less Common - in 1 to 20 people out of 100 people

Dizziness

Fatigue

Headache

Difficulty sleeping

Elevated blood pressure

Elevated blood sugar

Elevated cholesterol

Nausea or vomiting

Weight gain

Night sweats

Loss of bone mineral density, bone fracture

Kidney and urinary bladder infections

Vaginal bleeding
Rare - in less than 1 out of 100 people

Constipation
Risks of Having Blood Taken
In this study, we will need to get about 9 tablespoons of blood from you over the course of 
the study for research. This is in addition to the standard of care blood tests. We will get 
blood by putting a needle into one of your veins and letting the blood flow into a vacuum 
tube.  You may feel some pain when the needle goes into your vein.  A day or two later, 
you may have a small bruise where the needle went under the skin. 
Risks of biopsy
In this study, you will have an option to give up to 3 biopsies for research. There are some 
risks to taking a biopsy. There is a small chance that you could get an infection where the 
needle goes in. You may also experience redness, swelling, minor bleeding or bruising at 
the site where the cut was made or the needle inserted. You may experience mild to 
moderate pain at the site of the needle puncture. There is also a small chance that you 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 16 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
could have an allergic reaction to the numbing medicine. After your skin heals up, you may 
have a small scar where we take the samples. 
Archival tumor tissue
A section will be taken from tumor tissue samples you may have had in the past. Since this 
has already been removed from you, there are no additional risks to you. 
Risks of having an ECG
An electrocardiogram (ECG) is a test that records the electrical activity of the heart. Skin 
irritation is rare but could occur during an ECG from the electrodes or gel that is used.
Risks of Having an IV Inserted in Your Vein
In this study, we may need to insert a needle – connected to a plastic tube –into a vein in 
your arm. You will feel some pain when we first insert the tube into your vein. You may 
have some redness, swelling, or bruising where the tube goes under your skin. In some 
cases, this type of tube can cause an infection where it goes under the skin. In rare cases, 
it can cause a blood clot in the vein. You may have this tube inserted if you participate in 
the PK draws.
Risks Associated with Pregnancy
The use of the study drugs in pregnant females and nursing mothers has not been studied. 
The effects of the study drugs on human eggs and sperm has not been studied. The risks 
to a human fetus are unknown. 
However, animal testing has shown embryo-fetal toxicity that could be a potential risk in 
humans for all the study drugs (tucatinib, palbociclib, and letrozole) in this study. 
All female and male subjects of childbearing potential must use an acceptable form of birth 
control while on this study, as females must not become pregnant while taking the study 
drugs. Before you begin study treatment, your doctor will discuss acceptable forms of birth 
control with you. 
Tucatinib, Palbociclib, or letrozole could hurt or kill a baby growing in the womb. You 
should not try to get pregnant or get your partner pregnant while you are on this clinical 
trial. An effective method of birth control should be used for up to 30 days after the end of 
this study.
If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, you cannot be in this study. We will remove anyone 
who becomes pregnant while on study from the study treatment immediately.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 17 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Additionally, tucatinib, palbociclib, or letrozole could hurt a breastfeeding baby. You must 
not breastfeed during the study and you should wait to breastfeed for up to 30 days after 
the end of treatment.
You should tell your study doctor right away if:
●
you become pregnant while you are in this study
●
you think that you are pregnant while taking part in this study
●
you or your partner become pregnant within 30 days after being treated with 
tucatinib, palbociclib, and letrozole.
Birth Control Requirements
If you can get pregnant, you must use a safe birth control method while you are taking part 
in this study. Safe birth control methods fail less than 1% of the time. This means that if 
100 people used this birth control for a whole year, at most 1 person would get pregnant. 
You must use safe birth control methods while you take part in the study and keep using 
them for 30 days after stopping all study treatment. If you do not use safe birth control 
methods while you take part in the study, we might decide that you cannot take part in the 
study anymore.
The safe birth control methods that you can use are: 
●
Non-hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) like Paragard 
●
tubal ligation for females (“tubes tied”)
●
condoms/vaginal diaphragm
●
vasectomy for males
Talk with your doctor about your birth control options. You may also choose to not be 
sexually active (complete abstinence) while you take part in the study.
If you are able to get pregnant, you must use a barrier method such as a male or female 
condom when you are taking part in the study. You must keep using a barrier method for 
30 days after finishing treatment.
Fertility Risks
It is not known if patients in this trial will have problems getting pregnant after taking 
tucatinib, palbociclib, or letrozole. 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 18 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Risk of Loss of Confidentiality
There is a risk that people outside of the research team will see your research information.  
We will do all that we can to protect your information, but it cannot be guaranteed.
The study may include risks that are unknown at this time. 
What are the possible benefits of the study?
This study is designed for the researcher to learn more about the effects of the study drug 
on your disease.  However, there is no guarantee that your health will improve if you join 
this study.  Also, there could be risks to being in this study.  If there are risks, these are 
described in the section describing the discomforts or risks.
Are there alternative treatments? 
There may be other ways of treating your (HR+/HER2+) metastatic breast cancer.
These other ways include: 

You may choose to receive treatment with another experimental therapy.

You may choose to receive treatment with another approved therapy.
Approved therapies for patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer include: 
(1) anti-endocrine agents (tamoxifen, fulvestrant, anastrozole, letrozole, 
exemestane) 
(2) combination of anti-endocrine agents and HER2-targeted agents 
(trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib)
(3) combination of chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents
(4) antibody-drug conjugate TDM-1

You may choose to receive comfort/palliative care.

You could also choose to get no treatment at all.
You should talk to your doctor about your choices.  Make sure you understand all of your 
choices before you decide to take part in this study.  You may leave this study and still 
have these other choices available to you. 
Who is paying for this study? 
This research is being conducted by Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD, with funding support 
by Pfizer, Inc. who is also providing the study drug palbociclib. Seattle Genetics, Inc. will 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 19 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
provide the other study drug tucatinib. You will be required to pay for your treatment with 
letrozole as part of your standard care. 
The sponsor will only pay for procedures not considered standard of care.
Ask your study doctor to discuss any costs that will not be covered by the study. This 
discussion should include the costs of treating possible side effects. Otherwise, you might 
have unexpected expenses from being in this study
Will I be paid for being in the study?  
You will not be paid to be in the study. 
Will I have to pay for anything?
There are some medical procedures and treatments that you would get for your condition 
whether you were in this study or not, such as clinic visits, blood draws, or treatment with 
Letrozole. You and/or your health insurance may be billed for the costs of medical care 
during this study, if these expenses would have happened even if you were not in the 
study, or if your insurance agrees in advance to pay.  If you have health insurance, the 
cost of these services will be billed to your insurance company.  If your insurance does not 
cover these costs, or you do not have insurance, these costs will be your responsibility.
Is my participation voluntary?
Taking part in this study is voluntary.  You have the right to choose not to take part in this 
study.  If you choose to take part, you have the right to stop at any time.  If you refuse or 
decide to withdraw later, you will not lose any benefits or rights to which you are entitled. 
If you leave this study, you will still receive your normal medical care.  The only medical 
care that you will lose is the medical care you are getting as part of this study.  
If there are any new findings during the study that may affect whether you want to continue 
to take part, you will be told about them.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 20 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Can I be removed from this study? 
The study doctor may decide to stop your participation without your permission if the study 
doctor thinks that being in the study may cause you harm, or for any other reason. Also, 
the sponsor may stop the study at any time. 
What happens if I am injured or hurt during the study? 
If you have an injury while you are in this study, you should call Elena Shagisultanova, MD, 
PhD immediately.  Her phone number is 303-724-0083. In an emergency, call 9-1-1.
We will arrange to get you medical care if you have an injury that is caused by this 
research. However, you or your insurance company will have to pay for that care. 
Who do I call if I have questions?
The researcher carrying out this study is Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD. You may ask 
any questions you have now. If you have questions, concerns, or complaints later, you 
may call Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD at 303-724-0083. You will be given a copy of this 
form to keep.  
You may have questions about your rights as someone in this study. You can call Elena 
Shagisultanova, MD, PhD with questions.  You can also call the responsible Institutional 
Review Board (COMIRB).  You can call them at 303-724-1055. 
A description of this clinical trial will be available on http://www.Clinical Trials.gov, as 
required by U.S. Law. This Web site will not include information that can identify you. At 
most, the Web site will include a summary of the results. You can search this Web site at 
any time.
Optional Consent for Research Study Procedures
Here are the optional parts of this study. Remember, no matter what you decide to 
do about this optional part of the study, you may still take part in the main study. 
If you decide to withdraw your consent for the optional parts, you can continue to take 
part in the main study, unless you withdraw your consent for the main study as well.  
Following each optional procedure is a statement asking if you want to participate in the 
optional procedure. Please read the statement and think about your choice. After 
reading the sentence, please check “Yes” or “No” and initial next to your choice. If you 
have any questions, please talk to your doctor or the study team member. 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 21 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Optional consent for biopsies
Please note that the Optional Tumor Biopsies part of the study is not a requirement of 
the main study. You can still be in the main study if you do not provide the optional 
tumor biopsies noted in this section. You can decide at any point not to participate in 
the optional tumor biopsies.
As part of this study you are being asked if you would like to participate in optional 
tumor biopsies. If you have a tumor from which a core or punch biopsy can be 
obtained, and you agree to the procedure, a small sample of your tumor tissue will be 
taken at the following time points:

Baseline

Anytime during Cycle 2

End of treatment
I give my permission for a biopsy of my tumor to be taken at the time points listed 
above and stored in a central tissue bank at the University of Colorado Denver for this 
research.
   Yes
   No
_________Initials
Optional consent for data and specimen banking for future research
Dr. Shagisultanova would like to keep some of the data, blood and tissue that is taken 
during the study but is not used for other tests. If you agree, the data and samples will 
be kept and may be used in future research to learn more about breast cancer. The 
research that is done with your data and samples is not designed to specifically help 
you. It might help people who have breast cancer and other diseases in the future. 
Reports about research done with your data and samples will not be given to you or 
your doctor. These reports will not be put in your health records. The research using 
your data and samples will not affect your care.
The choice to let Dr. Shagisultanova keep the data and samples for future research is 
up to you. No matter what you decide to do, it will not affect the care that you will 
receive as part of the study. If you decide now that your data and samples can be kept 
for research, you can change your mind at any time and contact your study doctor to let 
him or her know that you do not want Dr. Shagisultanova to use your data and samples 
any longer, and they will no longer be used for research. Otherwise, they may be kept 
until they are used up, or until Dr. Shagisultanova decides to destroy them. 

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 22 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
When your data and samples are given to other researchers in the future, Dr. 
Shagisultanova will not give them your name, address, phone number or any other 
information that will let the researchers know who you are. 
Sometimes data and samples are used for genetic research (about diseases that are 
passed on in families). Even if your data and samples are used for this kind of 
research, the results will not be told to you and will not be put in your health records. 
Your data and samples will only be used for research and will not be sold. The 
research done with your data and samples may help to develop new products in the 
future, but there is no plan for you to be paid.
The possible benefits of research from your data and samples include learning more 
about what causes breast cancer and other diseases, how to prevent them and how to 
treat them. The greatest risk to you is the release of your private information. Dr. 
Shagisultanova will protect your records so that your name, address and phone 
number will be kept private. The chance that this information will be given to someone 
else is very small. There will be no cost to you for any data or sample collection and 
storage by Dr. Shagisultanova and the University of Colorado Denver.
Please read each sentence below and think about your choice. After reading each 
sentence, circle “yes” or “no.” If you have questions, please talk to your doctor or nurse. 
Remember, no matter what you decide to do about the storage and future use of your 
data and samples, you may still take part in the study.
I give my permission for my data, blood and tissue to be stored in a central tissue bank 
at the University of Colorado Denver for future use by the study investigators:
1. I give my permission for my data, blood and tissue samples to be kept by 
Dr. Shagisultanova for use in future research to learn more about how to 
prevent, detect, or treat breast cancer.
   Yes
   No
_________Initials
2. I give my permission for my data, blood and tissue samples to be used for 
research about other health problems (for example: causes of heart 
disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, etc.).
   Yes
   No
_________Initials

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 23 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
3. I give my permission for my study doctor (or someone he or she chooses) 
to contact me in the future to ask me to take part in more research.
   Yes
   No
_________Initials
Who will see my research information?
The University of Colorado Denver (UCD) and its affiliated hospital(s) have rules to protect 
information about you.  Federal and state laws including the Health Insurance Portability 
and Accountability Act (HIPAA) also protect your privacy. This part of the consent form 
tells you what information about you may be collected in this study and who might see or 
use it.  
The institutions involved in this study include: 

University of Colorado Denver

University of Colorado Hospital
We cannot do this study without your permission to see, use and give out your information.  
You do not have to give us this permission.  If you do not, then you may not join this study.  
We will see, use and disclose your information only as described in this form and in our 
Notice of Privacy Practices; however, people outside the UCD and its affiliate hospitals 
may not be covered by this obligation.
We will do everything we can to maintain the confidentiality of your personal information 
but confidentiality cannot be guaranteed. 
The use and disclosure of your information has no time limit.  You can cancel your 
permission to use and disclose your information at any time by writing to the study’s 
Principal Investigator (PI), at the name and address listed below.  If you do cancel your 
permission to use and disclose your information, your part in this study will end and no 
further information about you will be collected.  Your cancellation would not affect 
information already collected in this study.  
Study Principal Investigator (PI) address:
Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
12801 East 17th Avenue 
Mail Stop 8117, Room 8101A
 
Aurora, CO 80045

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 24 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Both the research records that identify you and the consent form signed by you may be 
looked at by others who have a legal right to see that information, such as:
  

Federal offices such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Office of 
Human Research Protections (OHRP) that protect research subjects like you.

People at the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB).

The study doctor and the rest of the study team.

Pfizer, Inc., the company providing funding support and the study drug palbociclib.

Seattle Genetics, Inc., who is providing the study drug tucatinib.

Officials at the institution where the research is conducted and officials at other 
institutions involved in this study who are in charge of making sure that we follow all 
of the rules for research.

Criterium, Inc., a Contract Research Organization who is assisting with the 
management and monitoring of this study
We might talk about this research study at meetings.  We might also print the results of this 
research study in relevant journals, but we will always keep the names of the research 
subjects, like you, private. 
You have the right to request access to your personal health information from the 
Investigator. To ensure proper evaluation of test results, your access to these study results 
may not be allowed until after the study is completed.
The investigator (or staff acting on behalf of the investigator) will use your 
information for the research outlined in this consent form. They will also make all or 
some of the following health information about you collected in this study available 
to: 

Other approved participating sites

External collaborating institutions
Some of the research procedures involve genetic testing or the use of your genetic 
information. Some of your specimens and de-identified results of tumor molecular analysis 
(data on genes and proteins in your tumor), and/ or de-identified health information might 
also be placed into one or more external publicly-accessible scientific databases. For 
example, the National Institutes of Health (an agency of the federal government) maintains 
a genetic database called “The Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes” (dbGaP). The 
information that could directly identify you (such as your name, address, or social security 
number) will never be placed into these external databases. A researcher who wants to 
study de-identified information from these databases must have an approved study and 
work with the group overseeing the database to obtain the information.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 25 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
A Federal law, called the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), generally 
makes it illegal for health insurance companies, group health plans, and most employers to 
discriminate against you based on your genetic information. This law generally will protect 
you in the following ways: 

Health insurance companies and group health plans may not request your genetic 
information that we get from this research. 

Health insurance companies and group health plans may not use your genetic 
information when making decisions regarding your eligibility or premiums. 

Employers with 15 or more employees may not use your genetic information that we 
get from this research when making a decision to hire, promote, or fire you or when 
setting the terms of your employment. 
All health insurance companies and group health plans must follow this law by May 21, 
2010. All employers with 15 or more employees must follow this law as of November 21, 
2009.
 
Be aware that this Federal law does not protect you against genetic discrimination by 
companies that sell life insurance, disability insurance, or long-term care insurance.
Information about you that will be seen, collected, used, and disclosed in this study: 

Name and Demographic Information (age, sex, ethnicity, address, phone number, 
etc.

Portions of your previous and current Medical Records that are relevant to this 
study, including but not limited to Diagnosis(es), History and Physical, laboratory or 
tissue studies, radiology studies, procedure results

Research Visit and Research Test records

Tissue samples and the data with the samples. 

Billing or financial information
What happens to Data, Tissue, Blood and Specimens that are collected in this 
study? 
Scientists at the University of Colorado Denver and the hospitals involved in this study 
work to find the causes and cures of disease.  The data, tissue, blood and specimens 
collected from you during this study are important to this study and to future research.  If 
you join this study:

The data, tissue, blood, or other specimens given by you to the investigators for 
this research no longer belong to you.  

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 26 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Both the investigators and any sponsor of this research may study your data, 
tissue, blood, or other specimens collected from you.

If data, tissue, blood, or other specimens are in a form that identifies you, UCD 
or the hospitals involved in this study may use them for future research only with 
your consent or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.

Any product or idea created by the researchers working on this study will not 
belong to you.

There is no plan for you to receive any financial benefit from the creation, use or 
sale of such a product or idea. 
HIPAA Authorization for Optional Additional Study Procedures 
In this form, you were given the option to agree to additional, optional research 
procedures.  You must also give us your permission, under HIPAA rules, to use and 
disclose the information collected from these optional procedures, as described above.  
If you decline to give us permission to use and disclose your information, you cannot take 
part in these optional procedures, but you can still participate in the main study.  Please 
initial next to your choice:
_____ I give permission for my information, from the optional procedures I have agreed 
to above, to be used and disclosed as described in this section.
_____ I do not give permission for my information for any optional procedures to be 
used and disclosed; I understand that I will not participate in any optional 
procedures.

Phase II Consent and Authorization Form 
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  3/19/2020
Page 27 of 27
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Agreement to be in this study and use my data
I have read this paper about the study or it was read to me.  I understand the possible risks 
and benefits of this study.  I understand and authorize the access, use and disclosure of 
my information as stated in this form.  I know that being in this study is voluntary.  I choose 
to be in this study: I will get a signed and dated copy of this consent form.
Signature: 
Date: __________
Print Name: 
Consent form explained by: 
Date: __________
Print Name: 
Use the following only if applicable.
Witness Signature: 
 Date: 
_____
Witness Print Name:  
Witness of Signature: 
Witness of consent process: 

Phase Ib Consent and Authorization Form
Page 1 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Principal Investigator:
Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
COMIRB No:  
16-1661
CRITERIUM No:
17BR01
Version Date:  
March 19, 2020
Study Title: 
PHASE IB/II OPEN-LABEL SINGLE ARM STUDY TO 
EVALUATE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TUCATINIB IN 
COMBINATION WITH LETROZOLE AND PALBOCICLIB IN 
SUBJECTS WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE AND 
HER2-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
You are being asked to be in a research study. This form provides you with information 
about the study. A member of the research team will describe this study to you and answer 
all of your questions. Please read the information below and ask questions about anything 
you do not understand before deciding whether or not to take part. 
Why is this study being done?
This study plans to learn more about the combination therapy of tucatinib with palbociclib 
and letrozole and how these drugs work together to treat your type of cancer. Letrozole has been 
approved as standard treatment for metastatic breast cancer by the U.S. Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA). Palbociclib has been approved by the FDA for treatment of hormone receptor 
positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer, but has not yet been approved for patients with HR+ and 
HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Tucatinib has not been approved for combination treatment of 
Palbociclib and letrozole in metastatic breast cancer patients. However, Tucatinib has been 
approved for combination treatment with trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with advanced 
unresectable or metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. This is considered an “Investigational” study 
because this combination of drugs has not yet been approved by the FDA. The purpose of 
this study is to evaluate the safety and how well the study drugs are tolerated when given 
in combination.
You are being asked to be in this research study because you have been diagnosed with 
HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.
Throughout the rest of this form, when these drugs are referenced by themselves they will 
be called tucatinib, palbociclib, and letrozole, but when referenced together or in 
combination they will be called the “study drugs”. 
Other people in this study
This study has two parts. The first part is a dose de-escalation, also called Phase Ib. The 
second part is an expansion, also called Phase II. These parts will be described in the next 
section of this consent form.
COMIRB
Approved for
RECONSENT
25-Jun-2020
09-Jun-2021

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 2 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Up to 25 people from around the country will participate in the Phase Ib part of this study. 
Up to 50 people from around the country will participate in both parts of the study.
What happens if I join this study?
If you join the study, you will be asked to sign this consent form. You will be given a copy 
to keep and the original form will be kept at the clinic. You can withdraw from the study at 
any time and without giving a reason. This will not affect the standard medical care you 
receive. 
The two parts to this study are:
Part I – Phase Ib
Dose de-escalation group (cohort) - The goal of this part of the study is to see how 
safe tucatinib is when taken in combination with palbociclib and letrozole. In this 
part of the study, the tucatinib and palbocilib doses can be changed for safety. You 
will continue to take the study drugs as long as it is safe and effective for you to do 
so.
Part II – Phase II
Expansion group (cohort) – In this part of the study we will use the doses of the 
study drugs determined from Part I.  We will further study how effective this 
combination of study drugs may be in treating HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast 
cancer. 
By signing this consent form, you will be taking part in Phase Ib of this study, which has 
three (3) sections:
1. Before starting the study (Screening)
2. During the study (Treatment)
3. Completion of study (End of Treatment and Follow-up)
There are also optional parts of this study. These optional procedures are voluntary and 
are not required. You can still take part in the main study if you choose not to take part in 
the optional study procedures. You will be given the choice later in this consent form to 
decide if you would like to take part in these optional procedures.
This next section is an overview of what will be expected of you, and what you can expect 
if you take part in this study. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 3 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Study Procedures:
Below are the study procedures and schedule of events (when each procedure will take 
place) for the dose de-escalation group (Part I) of this study.  Some procedures you 
receive while taking part in this study are “standard of care procedures” for treatment of 
your disease. If you have had some of these procedures recently, they may not need to be 
repeated. Some procedures are required only for this research study and will be called 
“research” procedures. The time points when these study procedures will take place are 
specified in the next section called “Study Visits”.

Informed Consent  
This informed consent form will be discussed with you and you will be given a copy 
of this document. If you join the study, you will be asked to sign this consent form 
before you receive any study related tests or procedures.

Medical and Cancer History 
Before you start the study, we will record your date of birth, race, ethnicity, and 
complete medical history. This medical history will look at the background and 
history of your cancer and any treatments you have received for your disease. 

Physical Examination
A physical examination will be completed as part of your standard of care at 
screening and throughout the duration of the study. After you join the study, we will 
assess if the study drugs are affecting your body functions including lungs, heart, 
abdomen, extremities, skin, head (eyes, ears, nose, hair, etc.) and your neurological 
function. 

Tumor Tissue Samples
o
Archived Tissue.  If you had surgery for your cancer in the past, you must 
agree to allow us to contact the institution where you had your surgery and 
ask them to send us a portion of your tumor tissue that they have stored so 
we may use it for this research.  
o
Tumor tissue biomarker testing during the study 
We will ask you to allow us to take a fresh biopsy of your tumor tissue and 
keep it for research. There are three optional tumor biopsies in this study: 
(1) prior to the start of treatment, 
(2) after completion of the first 28 days of treatment, and 
(3) at the end of the study. 
This is a voluntary part of this study, and you will be given the option later in 
this consent form to take part, or not take part, in this optional procedure. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 4 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Blood and Urine Samples 
These tests are sometimes called safety labs so the study doctor can be sure it is 
safe for you to take part in this study and to be given the study drugs.  These tests 
will include some standard of care tests and some research tests: 
o
Pregnancy test:  Women who are able to become pregnant will be given 
either a urine or a blood pregnancy test.  A positive pregnancy test prior to 
being given the study drugs will exclude you from starting or continuing to 
take part in the study. 
o
Complete blood count (CBC)
o
Comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP)
o
Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood test. This is a research related test that will allow 
us to see how long the study drugs remain in your body. 
o
Blood clotting tests (PT/INR, and PTT) 
o
Biomarker blood test. This research test will look at how and if your cancer is 
responding to the treatment.
Your doctor may order additional blood tests that he/she feels are needed to plan 
treatment, dose modification, or further evaluations.

Electrocardiogram (ECG) 
This is a noninvasive procedure that records the electrical activity of the heart. 
Electrodes are placed on the skin of the chest and connected in a specific order to a 
machine. Output usually appears on a long scroll of paper that displays a printed 
graph.  This will check the electrical activity of your heart.

Echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multigated Acquisition (MUGA) Scan
This is a noninvasive scan of the heart using sound waves.  This test will be used to 
see how well your heart pumps blood.  

Vital Signs 
We will take your blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and 
weight. Height will be measured only during screening.

Performance Status  
We will assess how well you are performing your daily activities.

Other Medications
Your study doctor will let you know which other medications you can and cannot 
take while taking part in this study. You will need to check with the study doctor 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 5 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
before taking any new medications. From the time you first receive the study drugs 
through 30 days after the last dose, we will record other medications you may be 
taking. 

Review of the Adverse Events (AEs)
Some risks have been identified because of the disease process or through use of 
the study drugs. These are commonly called side effects and will be followed very 
closely by your doctor and the study staff. More information about these will be 
provided in the Risk section of this consent form. 
Study Visits:
1.  SCREENING
After signing this consent form you will have the following done to see if you can be 
in this study:

Review your medical and cancer history

ECHO or MUGA scan of your heart

Physical exam

Vital signs 

Performance status

Blood tests:
o
Complete blood count (CBC) including types – white cells, red cells and 
platelets (differential) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP)
o
Blood clotting (PT/INR and PTT) – research
o
Pregnancy (women of childbearing potential)
o
Biomarker blood sample – research

Review of medications you are taking

ECG – research 

Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor burden. This 
may include diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan to document the 
locations of the cancer in your body. It may also include a brain MRI, if one is 
necessary.

Tumor tissue collections of archived biopsies – research

Tumor tissue biopsy - optional research procedure
You do not have to have this procedure if you do not want to. You will be 
given the choice later in this consent form to decide if you want to take part in 
this part of the study. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 6 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
If the procedures above show that you are eligible to participate in the study, you will 
undergo the following procedures while on treatment.
2.  TREATMENT
Cycle 1 Day 1

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Physical examination

Vital signs 

Performance status

Blood tests – CBC with differential and CMP

Begin treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – research 

You will be given a drug diary to complete – research 
Cycle 1 Day 15 

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Vital signs 

Blood tests – CBC with differential

Blood samples for PK analysis (described above) will be taken before you 
receive tucatinib and palbociclib, and after receiving these study drugs at 30 
minutes, and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours after receiving the dose – research

Review drug diary – research 

Continue treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – 
research 
Cycle 2 Day 1

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Physical examination

Vital signs

Performance status

Blood tests 
o
CBC with differential and CMP
o
Blood samples for PK analysis will be taken before you receive 
tucatinib and palbociclib – research
o
Biomarker blood sample – research

Review drug diary from previous cycle – research 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 7 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – research 

You will be given a new drug diary to complete – research 

Tumor tissue biopsy - optional research procedure
This procedure can be performed at any time during cycle 2.  You do not 
have to have this procedure if you do not want to. You will be given the 
choice later in this consent form to decide if you want to take part in this part 
of the study. 
Cycle 2 Day 15

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Vital signs

Blood tests – CBC with differential

Review drug diary – research 

Continue treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit – 
research 
Cycle 3+ Day 1 

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Physical examination

Vital signs

Performance status

Blood tests – CBC with differential and CMP

Review drug compliance from previous cycle and drug diary

Administer treatment with the study drugs once instructed at clinic visit

You will be given a new drug diary to complete
Additional Study Procedures
While you are on this study, you will also have the following procedures done at 
regular time points.

Once every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks (6 cycles), then once every 12 
weeks: Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor 
burden. This may include diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan to 
document the locations of the cancer in your body. It may also include a 
brain MRI, if one is necessary.

Once every 12 weeks: ECHO or MUGA scan

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 8 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
3.  COMPLETION OF STUDY – (End of treatment and Follow-up)
You will need to return to clinic for a follow-up study visit if your disease gets worse, 
if you decide to withdraw from the study, or if you start a different anticancer 
therapy.
  
The following will be performed if not already performed in the prior week. 

Review of AEs

Review of  medications you are taking

Review drug compliance from previous cycle and drug diary

Vital signs

Physical exam

Performance status

Blood tests
o
CBC with differential and CMP
o
Additional biomarker blood sample – research

Imaging studies to document sites of disease and assess tumor burden. This 
may include diagnostic quality CT scan and bone scan to document the 
locations of the cancer in your body. It may also include a brain MRI, if one is 
necessary.

Tumor tissue biopsy - optional research procedure  
You do not have to have this procedure if you do not want to. You will be 
given the choice later in this consent form to decide if you want to take part in 
this part of the study. 
You will also need to return to the clinic for an additional safety follow-up visit in 
about 30 days after you stop treatment with the study drugs.  This visit will include:

Review of AEs

Review of medications you are taking

Vital signs

Physical exam

Performance status

Blood tests – CBC with differential and CMP

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 9 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
How long will I be on the study?
You may take part in this study for as long as you tolerate the study tests, procedures, and 
treatments and your disease is stable or improving. You will continue to receive treatment 
with the study drugs until your disease progresses or you have an unacceptable drug-
related side effect. 
What are the possible discomforts or risks?
As with any study drug, side effects may occur when taking this study drug. While taking 
part in this study, and being treated with the study drugs, you will be watched carefully for 
any side effects. Some side effects may go away after you stop taking the study drug. 
Some side effects can be long lasting and may never go away or may even lead to death. 
You should talk to your study doctor about any side effects or discomfort you may have. 
The study doctor may give you some medicine that will help with some side effects. The 
study doctor may also interrupt or discontinue the study drug. 
You will be notified by your study doctor of any new side effects seen in other patients that 
occur during the time you are on the study. This may affect you wanting to continue in this 
research study. 
You should avoid drinking grapefruit juice in large amounts (>34 oz. or 1 L)  and eating 
cranberries or drinking cranberry juice while participating in this study as it could affect how 
your body metabolizes the drugs.
You may experience risks or discomforts when taking part in this study, which include 
some that are common such as low blood cell counts, infections, gastrointestinal (stomach 
and intestines) symptoms, fever, and fatigue, some that are rare, such as life-threatening 
infections and sepsis, and some that are unknown at this time. This is not a complete list of 
risks or discomforts. A comprehensive list of risks and discomforts is provided later in this 
consent document.
Palbociclib has been given to approximately 1,674 patients with breast cancer who 
received palbociclib together with hormonal treatment in Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials.
Serious and life-threatening infections have been observed in some patients treated with 
palbociclib.
In a rat study where palbociclib was administered for the lifespan of the rat, microglial cell 
(a type of cell located in the central nervous system) tumors were seen at blood 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 10 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
concentrations higher than those used to treat humans. It is currently unknown what these 
findings observed only in male rats means for patients treated with palbociclib over time. 
Based on animal studies and prior human studies with the study drugs, and/or other 
studies with similar types of drugs, side effects or discomforts you may experience while in 
this study include:
Risks of the Study Drugs:
Tucatinib
Common - in more than 20 out of 100 people

Diarrhea

Dizziness

Fatigue

Nausea

Rash

Weakness
Less Common - in 1 to 20 people out of 100 people

Pain in the abdomen (belly pain)

Alkaline phosphatase elevation

Constipation

Cough

Creatinine increase (decreased kidney function)

Headache

Pain in arms or legs

Chest pain

Muscle pain

Shortness of breath/difficulty breathing

Potentially life-threatening abnormal liver function tests (hepatitis)

Anemia (low hemoglobin), which may make you feel tired or weak

Decreased appetite

Low sodium, potassium, magnesium and phosphate levels, or level of 
other electrolytes in your body

Bilirubin elevation (break down of red blood cells)

Leg swelling

Vomiting

Infection in the nose, sinuses or throat (upper respiratory tract infection). 
You may have fever, pain, or a hard time breathing.

Heavy sweating while sleeping (night sweats)

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 11 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Back pain

Infection that could cause frequent and painful urination (urinary tract 
infection)

Rare - in fewer than 1 out of 100 people

Weakness of the heart muscle (heart failure)

EKG changes (change in your heart’s electrical activity)/QT prolongation 
(takes heart longer than normal to recharge during beats)/irregular 
heartbeat/palpitations

Dehydration
Most Important Side Effects -

Liver Function Problems
Some participants who took tucatinib had problems with their liver. Your 
doctor will run tests to check that your liver is working properly during 
your treatment with tucatinib. Your doctor may change your tucatinib 
dose based on the test results.

Diarrhea
Tucatinib can cause severe watery poop (diarrhea). If you have watery 
poop, tell your doctor right away. Your doctor may change your tucatinib 
dose if you have watery poop.

Kidney Function Problems
Some participants who got tucatinib had higher creatinine levels. This 
could mean that there are problems with your kidneys. If this happens, 
it’s usually within the first treatment cycle. Participants who have had 
increased levels of creatinine had these levels stay increased while they 
were getting treated. The levels went back down after treatment stopped.

Interactions with Other Medications 
Tucatinib may change how your body reacts to some other drugs, which 
could stay in your body longer than usual. While you are taking part in 
this study, you might need to stop some medications or replace them 
with other medications. If you can’t stop taking these medications, your 
doctor might need to change how much you take. Your doctor might also 
need to watch your health more closely while you are taking part in this 
study.

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 12 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Palbociclib
More Common - in more than 30 out of 100 people

Decrease in neutrophil blood cells (may increase the risk for infection)

Decrease in white blood cell count (infection fighting cells)

Infections, including serious bacterial or viral infections or reactivation of 
previous infections

Feeling tired or fatigued
Common - in 10 to 30 people out of 100 people

Anemia (low hemoglobin), which may make you feel tired or weak

Low platelet count, which may increase your risk of bleeding or bruising

Inflammation or sores of the mouth or throat, which may make it difficult 
to talk, eat, or swallow

Diarrhea

Constipation

Nausea

Vomiting

Joint pain

Back pain

Pain in the hands and feet

Hair loss

Rash

Cough

Shortness of breath

Headache

Decreased appetite

Hot Flush

Dizziness

Inability to sleep (insomnia)

Common Cold

Fever
Less Common - in 5 to less than 10 people out of 100 people

Abdominal pain

Indigestion

Dry mouth

Weakness (asthenia)

Swelling of the hands and feet

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 13 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Irritation or sores in the lining of hollow organs like mouth, throat, 
stomach, or bowels

Pain

Influenza- (flu-) like illness

Muscle pain

Pain in the muscles and bone including around the chest and neck

Muscle cramps

Increases in blood liver markers that may indicate liver damage, including 
potentially life threatening liver damage

Dry skin

Itching

Mouth or throat pain

Nosebleeds

Impaired sense of taste

Depression

Falls

Anxiety

Increased blood pressure

Heartburn (acid reflux)

Increased creatinine level that could indicate abnormal kidney function
Rare - in less than 5 out of 100 people

Fever associated with a dangerously low level of a type of white blood cell 
counts (neutrophils)

Blurred vision

Dry eyes or watery eyes

Interstitial lung disease / pneumonitis (an inflammation of the lungs which 
can cause cough and shortness of breath)
Letrozole
Common – in more than 20 out of 100 people

Hot flashes or feeling flushed

Joint pain or arthritis

Mood swings

Pain in the muscles

Dryness in the vaginal area
Less Common – in 1 to 20 people out of 100 people

Dizziness

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 14 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Fatigue

Headache

Difficulty sleeping

Elevated blood pressure

Elevated blood sugar

Elevated cholesterol

Nausea or vomiting

Weight gain

Night sweats

Loss of bone mineral density, bone fracture

Kidney and urinary bladder infections

Vaginal bleeding
Rare - in less than 1 out of 100 people

Constipation
Risks of Having Blood Taken
In this study, we will need to get about 30 tablespoons of blood from you over the course 
of the study for research. This is in addition to the standard of care blood tests. We will get 
blood by putting a needle into one of your veins and letting the blood flow into a vacuum 
tube.  You may feel some pain when the needle goes into your vein.  A day or two later, 
you may have a small bruise where the needle went under the skin. 
Risks of biopsy
In this study, you will have an option to give up to 3 biopsies for research. There are some 
risks to taking a biopsy. There is a small chance that you could get an infection where the 
needle goes in. You may also experience redness, swelling, minor bleeding or bruising at 
the site where the cut was made or the needle inserted. You may experience mild to 
moderate pain at the site of the needle puncture. There is also a small chance that you 
could have an allergic reaction to the numbing medicine. After your skin heals up, you may 
have a small scar where we take the samples. 
Archival tumor tissue
A section will be taken from tumor tissue samples you may have had in the past. Since this 
has already been removed from you, there are no additional risks to you. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 15 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Risks of having an ECG
An electrocardiogram (ECG) is a test that records the electrical activity of the heart.  Skin 
irritation is rare but could occur during an ECG from the electrodes or gel that is used.
Risks of Having an IV Inserted in Your Vein
In this study, we may need to insert a needle, connected to a plastic tube, into a vein in 
your arm. You will feel some pain when we first insert the tube into your vein. You may 
have some redness, swelling, or bruising where the tube goes under your skin. In some 
cases, this type of tube can cause an infection where it goes under the skin. In rare cases, 
it can cause a blood clot in the vein. You may have this tube inserted for about 6 hours for 
the PK draw on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Risks Associated with Pregnancy
The use of the study drugs in pregnant females and nursing mothers has not been studied. 
The effects of the study drugs on human eggs and sperm has not been studied. The risks 
to a human fetus are unknown. 
However, animal testing has shown embryo-fetal toxicity that could be a potential risk in 
humans for all the study drugs (tucatinib, palbociclib, and letrozole) in this study. 
All female and male subjects of childbearing potential must use an acceptable form of birth 
control while on this study, as females must not become pregnant while taking the study 
drugs. Before you begin study treatment, your doctor will discuss acceptable forms of birth 
control with you. 
Tucatinib, Palbociclib, or letrozole could hurt or kill a baby growing in the womb. You 
should not try to get pregnant or get your partner pregnant while you are on this clinical 
trial. An effective method of birth control should be used for up to 30 days after the end of 
this study.
If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, you cannot be in this study. We will remove anyone 
who becomes pregnant while on study from the study treatment immediately.
Additionally, tucatinib, palbociclib, or letrozole could hurt a breastfeeding baby. You must 
not breastfeed during the study and you should wait to breastfeed for up to 30 days after 
the end of treatment.

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 16 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
You should tell your study doctor right away if:
●
you become pregnant while you are in this study
●
you think that you are pregnant while taking part in this study
●
you or your partner become pregnant within 30 days after being treated with 
tucatinib, palbociclib, and letrozole.
Birth Control Requirements
If you can get pregnant, you must use a safe birth control method while you are taking part 
in this study. Safe birth control methods fail less than 1% of the time. This means that if 
100 people used this birth control for a whole year, at most 1 person would get pregnant. 
You must use safe birth control methods while you take part in the study and keep using 
them for 30 days after stopping all study treatment. If you do not use safe birth control 
methods while you take part in the study, we might decide that you cannot take part in the 
study anymore.
The safe birth control methods that you can use are: 
●
intrauterine device (IUD) like Paragard
●
tubal ligation for females (“tubes tied”)
●
condoms/vaginal diaphragm
●
vasectomy for males
Talk with your doctor about your birth control options. You may also choose to not be 
sexually active (complete abstinence) while you take part in the study.
If you are able to get pregnant, you must use a barrier method such as a male or female 
condom when you are taking part in the study. You must keep using a barrier method for 
30 days after finishing treatment.
Fertility Risks
It is not known if patients in this trial will have problems getting pregnant after taking 
tucatinib, palbociclib, or letrozole. 
Risk of Loss of Confidentiality
There is a risk that people outside of the research team will see your research information.  
We will do all that we can to protect your information, but it cannot be guaranteed.
The study may include risks that are unknown at this time. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 17 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
What are the possible benefits of the study?
This study is designed for the researcher to learn more about the effects of the study drug 
on your disease.  However, there is no guarantee that your health will improve if you join 
this study.  Also, there could be risks to being in this study.  If there are risks, these are 
described in the section describing the discomforts or risks.
Are there alternative treatments? 
There may be other ways of treating your (HR+/HER2+) metastatic breast cancer.
These other ways include:
 

You may choose to receive treatment with another experimental therapy.

You may choose to receive treatment with another approved therapy.
Approved therapies for patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer include: 
(1) anti-endocrine agents (tamoxifen, fulvestrant, anastrozole, letrozole, 
exemestane) 
(2) combination of anti-endocrine agents and HER2-targeted agents 
(trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib)
(3) combination of chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents
(4) antibody-drug conjugate TDM-1

You may choose to receive comfort/palliative care.

You could also choose to get no treatment at all.
You should talk to your doctor about your choices.  Make sure you understand all of your 
choices before you decide to take part in this study.  You may leave this study and still 
have these other choices available to you. 
Who is paying for this study? 
This research is being conducted by Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD, with funding support 
by Pfizer, Inc., who is also providing the study drug palbociclib. Seattle Genetics will 
provide the other study drug, tucatinib. You will be required to pay for your treatment with 
letrozole as part of your standard care. 
The sponsor will only pay for procedures not considered standard of care.
Ask your study doctor to discuss any costs that will not be covered by the study. This 
discussion should include the costs of treating possible side effects. Otherwise, you might 
have unexpected expenses from being in this study.

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 18 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Will I be paid for being in the study?  
You will not be paid to be in the study. 
Will I have to pay for anything?
There are some medical procedures and treatments that you would get for your condition 
whether you were in this study or not, such as clinic visits, blood draws, or treatment with 
letrozole. You and/or your health insurance may be billed for the costs of medical care 
during this study, if these expenses would have happened even if you were not in the 
study, or if your insurance agrees in advance to pay.  If you have health insurance, the 
cost of these services will be billed to your insurance company.  If your insurance does not 
cover these costs, or you do not have insurance, these costs will be your responsibility.
Is my participation voluntary?
Taking part in this study is voluntary.  You have the right to choose not to take part in this 
study.  If you choose to take part, you have the right to stop at any time.  If you refuse or 
decide to withdraw later, you will not lose any benefits or rights to which you are entitled. 
If you leave this study, you will still receive your normal medical care.  The only medical 
care that you will lose is the medical care you are getting as part of this study.  
If there are any new findings during the study that may affect whether you want to continue 
to take part, you will be told about them.
Can I be removed from this study? 
The study doctor may decide to stop your participation without your permission if the study 
doctor thinks that being in the study may cause you harm, or for any other reason. Also, 
the sponsor may stop the study at any time.
What happens if I am injured or hurt during the study? 
If you have an injury while you are in this study, you should call Elena Shagisultanova, MD, 
PhD immediately.  Her phone number is 303-724-0083. In an emergency, call 9-1-1.
We will arrange to get you medical care if you have an injury that is caused by this 
research.  However, you or your insurance company will have to pay for that care. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 19 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Who do I call if I have questions?
The researcher carrying out this study is Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD. You may ask 
any questions you have now. If you have questions, concerns, or complaints later, you 
may call Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD at 303-724-0083. You will be given a copy of this 
form to keep.  
You may have questions about your rights as someone in this study. You can call Elena 
Shagisultanova, MD, PhD with questions.  You can also call the responsible Institutional 
Review Board (COMIRB).  You can call them at 303-724-1055. 
A description of this clinical trial will be available on http://www.Clinical Trials.gov, as 
required by U.S. Law. This Web site will not include information that can identify you. At 
most, the Web site will include a summary of the results. You can search this Web site at 
any time.
Optional Consent for Research Study Procedures
Here are the optional parts of this study. Remember, no matter what you decide to 
do about this optional part of the study, you may still take part in the main study. 
If you decide to withdraw your consent for the optional parts, you can continue to take 
part in the main study, unless you withdraw your consent for the main study as well.
Following each optional procedure is a statement asking if you want to participate in the 
optional procedure. Please read the statement and think about your choice. After 
reading the sentence, please check “Yes” or “No” and initial next to your choice. If you 
have any questions, please talk to your doctor or the study team member. 
Optional consent for biopsies
Please note that the Optional Tumor Biopsies part of the study is not a requirement of 
the main study.  You can still be in the main study if you do not provide the optional 
tumor biopsies noted in this section. You can decide at any point not to participate in 
the optional tumor biopsies.
As part of this study, you are being asked if you would like to participate in optional 
tumor biopsies. If you have a tumor from which a core or punch biopsy can be 
obtained, and you agree to the procedure, a small sample of your tumor tissue will be 
taken at the following time points:

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 20 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Baseline

Anytime during Cycle 2

End of treatment
I give my permission for a biopsy of my tumor to be taken at the time points listed 
above and stored in a central tissue bank at the University of Colorado Denver for 
this research.
   Yes
   No
_________Initials
Optional consent for data and specimen banking for future research
Dr. Shagisultanova would like to keep some of the data, blood and tissue that is taken 
during the study but is not used for other tests. If you agree, the data and samples will 
be kept and may be used in future research to learn more about breast cancer. The 
research that is done with your data and samples is not designed to specifically help 
you. It might help people who have breast cancer and other diseases in the future. 
Reports about research done with your data and samples will not be given to you or 
your doctor. These reports will not be put in your health records. The research using 
your data and samples will not affect your care.
The choice to let Dr. Shagisultanova keep the data and samples for future research is 
up to you. No matter what you decide to do, it will not affect the care that you will 
receive as part of the study. If you decide now that your data and samples can be kept 
for research, you can change your mind at any time and contact your study doctor to let 
him or her know that you do not want Dr. Shagisultanova to use your data and samples 
any longer, and they will no longer be used for research. Otherwise, they may be kept 
until they are used up, or until Dr. Shagisultanova decides to destroy them. 
When your data and samples are given to other researchers in the future, Dr. 
Shagisultanova will not give them your name, address, phone number or any other 
information that will let the researchers know who you are. 
Sometimes data and samples are used for genetic research (about diseases that are 
passed on in families). Even if your data and samples are used for this kind of 
research, the results will not be told to you and will not be put in your health records. 
Your data and samples will only be used for research and will not be sold. The 
research done with your data and samples may help to develop new products in the 
future, but there is no plan for you to be paid.

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 21 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
The possible benefits of research from your data and samples include learning more 
about what causes breast cancer and other diseases, how to prevent them and how to 
treat them. The greatest risk to you is the release of your private information. Dr. 
Shagisultanova will protect your records so that your name, address and phone 
number will be kept private. The chance that this information will be given to someone 
else is very small. There will be no cost to you for any data or sample collection and 
storage by Dr. Shagisultanova and the University of Colorado Denver.
Please read each sentence below and think about your choice. After reading each 
sentence, circle “yes” or “no.” If you have questions, please talk to your doctor or 
nurse. Remember, no matter what you decide to do about the storage and future 
use of your data and samples, you may still take part in the study.
I give my permission for my data, blood and tissue to be stored in a central tissue 
bank at the University of Colorado Denver for future use by the study investigators:
1. I give my permission for my data, blood and tissue samples to be kept by 
Dr. Shagisultanova for use in future research to learn more about how to 
prevent, detect, or treat breast cancer.
   Yes
   No
_________Initials
2. I give my permission for my data, blood and tissue samples to be used for 
research about other health problems (for example: causes of heart 
disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, etc.).
   Yes
   No
_________Initials
3. I give my permission for my study doctor (or someone he or she chooses) 
to contact me in the future to ask me to take part in more research.
   Yes
   No
_________Initials
Who will see my research information?
The University of Colorado Denver (UCD) and its affiliated hospital(s) have rules to protect 
information about you.  Federal and state laws including the Health Insurance Portability 
and Accountability Act (HIPAA) also protect your privacy. This part of the consent form 
tells you what information about you may be collected in this study and who might see or 
use it.  

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 22 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
The institutions involved in this study include:

University of Colorado Denver

University of Colorado Hospital
We cannot do this study without your permission to see, use and give out your information.  
You do not have to give us this permission.  If you do not, then you may not join this study.  
We will see, use and disclose your information only as described in this form and in our 
Notice of Privacy Practices; however, people outside the UCD and its affiliate hospitals 
may not be covered by this obligation.
We will do everything we can to maintain the confidentiality of your personal information 
but confidentiality cannot be guaranteed. 
The use and disclosure of your information has no time limit.  You can cancel your 
permission to use and disclose your information at any time by writing to the study’s 
Principal Investigator (PI), at the name and address listed below.  If you do withdraw your 
permission to use and disclose your information, your part in this study will end and no 
further information about you will be collected.  Your withdrawal would not affect 
information already collected in this study. 
 
Study Principal Investigator (PI) address:
Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
12801 East 17th Avenue
Mail Stop 8117, Room 8101A
Aurora, CO, 80045
Both the research records that identify you and the consent form signed by you may be 
looked at by others who have a legal right to see that information, such as:
  

Federal offices such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Office of 
Human Research Protections (OHRP) that protect research subjects like you.

People at the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB).

The study doctor and the rest of the study team.

Pfizer, Inc., the company providing funding support and the study drug Palbociclib. 

Seattle Genetics Therapeutics, who is providing the study drug Tucatinib.

Officials at the institution where the research is conducted and officials at other 
institutions involved in this study who are in charge of making sure that we follow all 
of the rules for research.

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 23 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)

Criterium, Inc., a Contract Research Organization who is assisting with the 
management and monitoring of this study
We might talk about this research study at meetings.  We might also print the results of this 
research study in relevant journals.  But we will always keep the names of the research 
subjects, like you, private. 
You have the right to request access to your personal health information from the 
Investigator. To ensure proper evaluation of test results, your access to these study results 
may not be allowed until after the study is completed.
The investigator (or staff acting on behalf of the investigator) will use your 
information for the research outlined in this consent form. They will also make all or 
some of the following health information about you collected in this study available 
to:  

Other approved participating sites

External collaborating institutions
Some of the research procedures involve genetic testing or the use of your genetic 
information. Some of your specimens and de-identified results of tumor molecular analysis 
(data on genes and proteins in your tumor), and/ or de-identified health information might 
also be placed into one or more external publicly-accessible scientific databases. For 
example, the National Institutes of Health (an agency of the federal government) maintains 
a genetic database called “The Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes” (dbGaP). The 
information that could directly identify you (such as your name, address, or social security 
number) will never be placed into these external databases. A researcher who wants to 
study de-identified information from these databases must have an approved study and 
work with the group overseeing the database to obtain the information.
A Federal law, called the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), generally 
makes it illegal for health insurance companies, group health plans, and most employers to 
discriminate against you based on your genetic information. This law generally will protect 
you in the following ways: 

Health insurance companies and group health plans may not request your genetic 
information that we get from this research. 

Health insurance companies and group health plans may not use your genetic 
information when making decisions regarding your eligibility or premiums. 

Employers with 15 or more employees may not use your genetic information that we 
get from this research when making a decision to hire, promote, or fire you or when 
setting the terms of your employment. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 24 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
All health insurance companies and group health plans must follow this law by May 21, 
2010. All employers with 15 or more employees must follow this law as of November 21, 
2009.
 
Be aware that this Federal law does not protect you against genetic discrimination by 
companies that sell life insurance, disability insurance, or long-term care insurance.
Information about you that will be seen, collected, used and disclosed in this study: 

Name and demographic information (age, sex, ethnicity, address, phone number, 
etc.

Portions of your previous and current medical records that are relevant to this 
study, including but not limited to diagnosis(es), history and physical, laboratory or 
tissue studies, radiology studies, procedure results.

Research visit and research test records.

Tissue samples and the data with the samples. 

Billing or financial information.
What happens to Data, Tissue, Blood and Specimens that are collected in this 
study? 
Scientists at the University of Colorado Denver and the hospitals involved in this study 
work to find the causes and cures of disease.  The data, tissue, blood and specimens 
collected from you during this study are important to this study and to future research.  If 
you join this study:

The data, tissue, blood, or other specimens given by you to the investigators for 
this research no longer belong to you.  

Both the investigators and any sponsor of this research may study your data, 
tissue, blood, or other specimens collected from you.

If data, tissue, blood, or other specimens are in a form that identifies you, UCD 
or the hospitals involved in this study may use them for future research only with 
your consent or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.

Any product or idea created by the researchers working on this study will not 
belong to you.

There is no plan for you to receive any financial benefit from the creation, use or 
sale of such a product or idea. 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 25 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
HIPAA Authorization for Optional Additional Study Procedures 
In this form, you were given the option to agree to additional, optional research 
procedures.  You must also give us your permission, under HIPAA rules, to use and 
disclose the information collected from these optional procedures, as described above.  
If you decline to give us permission to use and disclose your information, you cannot take 
part in these optional procedures, but you can still participate in the main study.  Please 
initial next to your choice:
_____ I give permission for my information, from the optional procedures I have agreed 
to above, to be used and disclosed as described in this section.
_____ I do not give permission for my information for any optional procedures to be 
used and disclosed; I understand that I will not participate in any optional 
procedures.
Agreement to be in this study and use my data
I have read this paper about the study or it was read to me.  I understand the possible risks 
and benefits of this study.  I understand and authorize the access, use and disclosure of 
my information as stated in this form.  I know that being in this study is voluntary.  I choose 
to be in this study: I will get a signed and dated copy of this consent form.
Signature: 
Date: __________
Print Name: 
Consent form explained by: 
Date: __________
Print Name: 

Consent and Authorization Form
COMIRB 16-1661
CRITERIUM 17BR01
PI:  Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD
Version Date:  03/19/2020
Page 26 of 26
Combined Biomed ICF and Compound HIPAA (CF-151.C, Effective 9-29-15)
Use the following only if applicable.
Witness Signature: 
  Date: 
Witness Print Name:  
Witness of Signature: 
Witness of consent process: