Will Patients Perceive a Vapocoolant Spray to be Effective in Reducing Pain and Increasing Satisfaction With Insertion at an Intravenous Site?
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Pain
Sponsor: Aultman Health Foundation

 
PROTOCOL TITLE: Will Patients Perceive a Vapocoolant Spray to be Effective in Reducing 
Pain and Increasing Satisfaction with Insertion at an Intravenous Site? 
PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR: 
Dr. Mitryan Kar, MD 
Aultman Health Foundation- Interventional Radiology 
(330) 363-2842 
Ryan.Kar@radpartners.com 
SUB-INVESTIGATORS: 
Jennifer Miller, BSN, RN, PCCN  
 
Laura Wagner, ASR, RT (R)(N), CNMT 
Aultman Health Foundation- Radiology  
Aultman Health Foundation- Nuclear Medicine 
(330) 363-4874 
 
 
 
(330) 363-6204 
Jen.Miller@aultman.com 
 
 
Laura.Wagner@aultman.com 
VERSION NUMBER: 3 
VERSION DATE: February 2, 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
2 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
1.0 
INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………3  
1.1 Abstract 
 
1.2 Relevant Literature and Data Rationale 
2.0 
STUDY OBJECTIVES………………………………………………………………………3 
2.1 Primary Objective 
 
2.2 Secondary Objectives...........................................................................................................4 
3.0 
SUBJECT SELECTION…………………………………………………………………….4 
 
3.1 Inclusion Criteria 
 
3.2 Exclusion Criteria 
4.0  
SUBJECT ENROLLMENT…………………………………………………………………5 
5.0 
STUDY DESIGN AND PROCEDURES……………………………………………………5 
 
5.1 Design/ Study Type 
 
5.2 Selection of Instruments 
 
5.3 Description of Intervention………………………………………………………………..6 
 
 
5.3.1 Interventional Products 
 
 
5.3.2 Product Handling and Storage 
 
 
5.3.3 Intervention Administration 
 
5.4 Data Collection…………………………………………………………………………….7 
6.0 
STUDY ADMINISTRATION……………………………………………………………….8 
 
6.1 Description of Study Process 
 
6.2 Data Quality and Confidentiality 
 
6.3 Regulatory and Ethical Consideration.................................................................................9 
 
 
6.3.1 
Risk Assessment 
 
 
6.3.2 
Potential Benefits of Study Participation……………………………………10 
 
 
6.3.3 
Informed Consent/Assent and HIPPA Authorization 
7.0 
SAFETY MANAGEMENT………………………………………………………………...10 
7.1 Adverse Events and Collection/Reporting 
 
7.2 Data Safety Monitoring Plan 
8.0 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS……………………………………………….........10 
9.0 
OUTCOMES AND SIGNIFICANCE……………………………………………………..11 
10.0 
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………...12 

 
3 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
11.0 
APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………………13 
 
1.0 
INTRODUCTION 
 
1.1 
Abstract 
The primary purpose of this study is to determine if by offering a vapocoolant 
(cold spray) to Nuclear Medicine outpatients prior to having an intravenous 
catheter (IV) inserted will increase patient satisfaction of IV insertion as well as 
determine if pain of insertion is decreased. Furthermore, this study will examine 
the patients’ willingness to use a vapocoolant spray with future IV insertions and 
potentially reduce anxiety when an IV insertion is required. 
 
1.2  
Relevant Literature and Data Rationale 
Patients requiring intravenous (IV) access are faced with the necessity of an 
invasive and uncomfortable procedure. Approximately 25 million people in the 
United States and 90% of all hospitalized patients require IV catheter insertion. 
(Levitt, F.C. & Ziemba-Davis, M., 2013).  
 Pain management during medical care, in addition to being recognized as a basic 
human right, impacts a patient’s satisfaction. (Hogan, M., Smart, S., Shah, V., & 
Taddio, A., 2014). The Joint Commission standards endorsed by the American 
Pain Society require health care providers to assess and manage pain. The 
standard of care for managing pain associated with invasive procedures is to 
anticipate and ameliorate pain to the greatest degree possible. (Levitt et al., 2013).  
Research studies have been conducted to determine the least painful method of 
anesthetizing a peripheral IV site in addition to studying patient’s perception of 
the anesthetizing agent. One study found that the use of 1% lidocaine 
intradermally before insertion of IV catheter was the most effective technique in 
reducing IV catheter insertion discomfort (Winfield, C., Knicely, C., Jensen, C., 
Taylor, S., Thomas, K., Burns, S., & Quatrara, B., 2013) however this particular 
method requires a physician order for lidocaine injection, can become costly and 
subjects the patient to an additional needle stick.  The advantage of utilizing a 
vapocoolant spray has been researched and found to likely reduce pain during 
intravenous cannulation and are not likely to make cannulation more difficult nor 
cause serious adverse events. (Griffith, R., Jordon, V., Herd, D., Reed, P., & 
Dalziel, S., 2016).  
This study is necessary to further support the use of a vapocoolant spray as a tool 
in managing pain or the perception of pain prior to IV cannulation insertion. 
2.0 
STUDY OBJECTIVES 
 
2.1 
Primary Objective 
The Nuclear Medicine department at Aultman Hospital seeks to address the issue 
surrounding pain and satisfaction associated with the invasive procedure of 
starting an intravenous catheter (IV) for the injection of radiopharmaceutical 

 
4 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
and/or medications needed to complete nuclear images and provide for viable 
scans. The primary purpose of this study is to determine if by applying a 
vapocoolant (cold spray) at the IV insertion site on Nuclear Medicine outpatients 
will increase the satisfaction with IV insertion as well as determine if pain of 
insertion is decreased. Furthermore, this study will examine the patients’ 
perception in using a vapocoolant spray as a way to improve upon the traditional 
method of starting IV’s that do not offer pain management prior to their insertion. 
A sterile water mist will be used as the comparator spray to add validity to the 
standard of care arm. 
Research Questions: 
For the purpose of this study, the following questions will be addressed: 
1. Will patients perceive a vapocoolant spray to be more effective in 
reducing pain prior to IV cannulation insertion over saline spray? 
2. Will the use of a vapocoolant spray increase satisfaction with insertion at 
an intravenous site over that of a sterile water spray? 
2.2 
Secondary Objective 
The broader implication to this study is to bring awareness to both caregivers and 
patients alike that there are options for pain management when IV insertions are 
needed and/or required. Furthermore, vapocoolant sprays are already being 
utilized for pain management in accessing port-a-cath sites in our Radiology 
department therefore this study could use the same spray as is indicated for its use 
in accessing IV insertion sites. 
3.0 
 SUBJECT SELECTION 
 
3.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
Patients who voluntarily agree to participate in the study and are scheduled for a 
Nuclear Medicine Stress Test at Aultman Heart Center. 
 
3.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
 
 
Patients will be excluded from this study for the following reasons: 
 
 
1) If this is the first time the patient has ever had an intravenous catheter (IV). 
 
 
2) Any patient under the age of 18 and/or any patient over the age of 85. 
 
 
3). Those who are or may be pregnant. 
 
 
4) Any woman who is breastfeeding. 
 
 
5) Any patient who has taken any narcotic, sedative, and/or as needed anti-anxiety       
                         medication within the last 8 hours of the intravenous catheter insertion. 
6). Any persons who are non-English speaking. 
7). Any persons who are decisionally impaired. 

 
5 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
8). Any persons who are illiterate.  
9). Any patient who has had a known hypersensitivity and/or allergy to Ethyl     
     Chloride. 
10). Any persons who have been diagnosed with Raynaud’s Syndrome and/or    
      Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. 
4.0 
SUBJECT ENROLLMENT 
The study population for this research is a convenience sample of patients who have been 
ordered to undergo a Nuclear Medicine Stress Test at Aultman Hospital Heart Center. 
Upon arrival to the Nuclear Medicine department the patient must check in at the front 
desk for his/her scheduled exam. The patient will need to fill out the necessary 
documents required by the nuclear medicine department to perform the stress test 
imaging. In addition to the patient will be given a letter to make them aware that a 
research study is being conducted within the department. (See Attachment 1-Explanation 
of Research Study). This letter is only intended to inform the patient that a research study 
is being conducted this is not intended to be used for the consent process. When it is time 
for the patient’s exam the researcher will take the patient back to the injection room 
where an explanation for the exam and need for IV access will be explained.  
The researcher of the study will have information from the patient’s health record that 
will indicate a patient’s age and gender. The researcher will automatically exclude any 
persons who do not meet the age requirement in addition to asking the patient if this is 
the first time they have ever had an intravenous catheter placed. Also at this time the 
researcher will determine if the patient is able to speak and read English as well as 
determine if the patient is decisionally aware. The patient will be asked additional 
questions to determine the patient’s inclusion/exclusions to participate in the research 
study. (See Attachment 2- Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Checklist). If the patient does not 
meet the criteria set forth for the study the patient will be told that they do not qualify at 
that time and that their nuclear exam will continue as ordered without the use of the 
research interventional spray being used in the study and they will get an IV using the 
method currently in practice. If a patient is eligible to participate in the study the 
researcher will make the patient aware of their eligibility and again explain the use of a 
vapocoolant spray vs. a placebo spray prior to IV insertion. The researcher will explain to 
the patient why the study is being conducted and allow the patient adequate time to 
decide on whether to participate in the study. If the patient chooses to participate in the 
study they will be asked to read and sign/date the HRRB approved research consent form. 
(See Attachment 3- Consent Form). Subjects will be given ample time to consider 
participation and have all of their questions addressed. 
5.0 
STUDY DESIGN AND PROCEDURES 
 
5.1  
Design/Study Type 
This is a single blind interventional study with a post design using a convenience 
sample of patients undergoing a Nuclear Medicine Stress Test at Aultman Heart 
Center.  

 
6 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
 
5.2 
Selection of Instruments  
A questionnaire will be filled out by the researcher while asking the patient 
questions prior to and after IV insertion. (See Attachment 4- Patient Questionnaire 
and Researcher Documentation Form). The patient will be provided with a visual 
diagram of a 0-10 pain scale and a 1-5 satisfaction Likert Scale. (See Attachment 
5- Visual Pain and Satisfaction Scale). 
 
5.3 
Description of Intervention 
 
 
This study will have both an experimental group and a control group.  
5.3.1  Interventional Products 
The control group will receive a placebo mist spray of sterile water. The 
product chosen for this is known as Nature’s Tears Eye mist and is 
manufactured by Bio-Logic Aqua Research Technologies International 
Inc. This product was used as a placebo in a similar study. (Mace, S.E., 
2016). This product is marketed to be used for the eyes and face but for 
the purpose of this study we will use it off label for its preservative and 
chemical free, non-allergenic, sterile properties. “With Nature’s Tears 
EyeMist, the assembly process begins with a plastic, aluminized barrier 
bag which is attached to a plastic applicator nozzle. The rigid aluminum 
canister, with bag and nozzle in place, is then pressurized with nitrogen, 
an inert chemical that comprises 80% of the air we breathe. Nitrogen has a 
greater capacity to pressurize than oxygen or air, retards freezing, and 
microbes cannot live in nitrogen. The unit is then sealed with a rubber 
gasket. In the extremely unlikely event that the gasket fails, the unit would 
depressurize and simply not work. As long as the seal is intact, the 
contents remain clean and sterile.” (Bio Logic Aqua Research 
Technologies International Inc, 2010.) The product has a four-year shelf 
life. (Bio Logic Aqua Research Technologies International Inc. 2010.) The 
experimental group will receive a spray that is manufactured by the 
Gebauer Company and is known as Ethyl Chloride Mist Spray Can P/N 
0386-0001-02. This spray was selected because of its current use and 
patient preference in accessing port-a-catheter sites. The mist spray is 
indicated for temporary control of pain associated with injections, starting 
IV’s and venipuncture, minor surgery and minor sports injuries. 
(Gebauer’s Ethyl Chloride Spray, 2016).  
The Nature’s Tears Eye mist and Ethyl Chloride sprays used will be 
unidentifiable by the patients in the study. The Radiology department at 
Aultman hospital has agreed to cover the cost for the sprays needed in this 
study. The Gebauer Company indicates that each spray can may be used 
up to 50 times therefore for the purpose of this study it is estimated that 2 
cans will be needed. The Bio-Logic Aqua Research Technologies 

 
7 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
corporate office has agreed to send 2 cans of their Nature’s Tears Eye mist 
at no charge.  
5.3.2  Product Handling and Storage 
The manufacturer of Nature’s Tears Eye Mist MDS report (see 
Attachment 7) indicates that the can should be stored at room temperature 
and should not be stored at temperature’s greater than 50ºC (120ºF). 
(Biologic Aqua Technologies, 2013). For the purpose of this study the 
Nature's Tear Mist spray will be refrigerated to "mimic" a cold spray. 
There are no documented contraindications that refrigeration would affect 
the sterility or application of the spray. The refrigerator is located in the 
Nuclear Medicine department's "Hot Lab" that is monitored by 
temperature control and is in a locked room. The Gebauer Company's 
Safety Data Sheet (SDS) (see Attachment 6) indicates that the ethyl 
chloride spray should be stored in cool, dry well ventilated area. Protect 
against physical damage. Do not subject to temperatures above 120°F 
(50°C). Do not store near high frequency ultrasound equipment or non-
explosion proof electrical equipment. (Gebauer Company, 2013.) This 
product will be stored in a locked cabinet located in the Nuclear Medicine 
Department's scan room which is temperature controlled at 72°F. 
5.3.3  Intervention Administration  
The researcher will access a peripheral IV site using the hospital protocol 
on inserting IV catheters. The researcher will select an IV site; the 
patient’s skin will be cleansed prior to the intervention spray being applied 
per hospital protocol. The researcher will then spray the intervention spray 
made by the Gebauer Company according to the manufacturer’s 
recommendations which is to spray the Ethyl Chloride aerosol can for 4 to 
10 seconds from a distance of 3 to 9 inches (8-23 cm). Do not spray longer 
than 10 seconds. Spray the area for the time recommended or until the skin 
just turns white; do not frost the skin. With skin, taut, quickly introduce 
the needle because the numbing effect of ethyl chloride only lasts for a 
few seconds to a minute. (Gebauer’s Ethyl Chloride Spray, 2016).  
Reapplication of the spray to the area when it has been too long or is no 
longer “numb” is also indicated by the manufacturer but for the purpose of 
this study the patient will only have the application applied once. For the 
control group the patient’s skin will be prepared per hospital protocol then 
the researcher will apply the Nature's Tears Eye Mist to the area for 4-10 
seconds prior to IV access. 
5.4 
Data Collection 
The questionnaire (See Attachment 4- Patient Questionnaire and Researcher 
Documentation Form) will include the following questions prior to the use of the 
intervention: 

 
8 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
1.) Using the visual analog scale provided how would you rate your pain the last 
time you remember having an IV inserted? 
2.) Using a 0-5 Likert scale please rate how satisfied you were the last time you 
remember having an IV inserted? 
3.) Do you think it is important to control the pain of starting an IV? 
 
Once the IV has been placed the researcher will ask the patient the following 
questions: 
1.) Using the same 0-10 pain scale how would you rate this IV insertion? 
2.) Using the same 1-5 satisfaction scale how satisfied were you with this IV 
insertion? 
3.) Would you choose to have a spray used again if you needed to have an IV 
inserted in the future? 
 The researcher will document the patient responses as well as the angiocatheter 
size, angiocatheter location, numbers of IV start attempts, the time that the 
intervention was applied and what interventional spray was used. (See 
Attachment 4- Patient Questionnaire and Researcher Documentation Form). This 
information will be coded and will be used to analyze study results post 
intervention. The presence of adverse events will be monitored and documented 
for 120 minutes following the IV insertion. 
6.0 
STUDY ADMINISTRATION 
 
6.1 
Description of Study Process 
This study will be conducted using patients who are ordered to undergo a Nuclear 
Medicine Stress Test. These patients will only be seen in this department the day 
that the stress test exam is performed. The anticipated time it will take to gather 
the patient’s information, conduct the recruitment and consent portion of the study 
is approximately 30 minutes per patient. This study will use a convenience sample 
of patients over a 4-month period. The target goal is 30 patients; however, 
researchers may recruit up to 80 patients. 
Once the determination has been made by the researcher that the patient is a 
candidate for the study the patient has consented they will be assigned to either 
the control group or experimental group through a computerized randomization 
sheet. Both the control group and experimental group will be equally represented. 
Once the IV has been placed regardless of what intervention was used the patient 
will then be asked by the researcher the questions as stated above. 
The participants will only have the intervention used on a first attempt IV access. 
If the participant has to have additional attempts by the researcher to start an IV, 
their study will automatically be excluded. 
 
6.2 
Data Quality and Confidentiality  

 
9 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
The information obtained during this study will remain confidential and will be 
stored in a file cabinet with a key lock. Jennifer Miller and Laura Wagner the 
Sub- investigators of this study under the supervision of the Principle Investigator 
Dr. Mitryan Kar will be responsible for the following: 
1). Explaining the study to potential participants along with conducting the 
consent process with the patient. 
2). Asking related questions to consented participants regarding the research 
information obtained during the conduction of this study. 
3). The medical review of patient health information determine eligibility. 
4). Administration of the vapocoolant spray and placebo spray prior to IV access. 
5). Performing IV access on study participants 
6). Identifying any adverse reaction to the intervention being used. All adverse 
events will be reported to and managed by the Principle Investigator. 
These responsibilities performed only by the Sub Investigators will ensure that 
there will be no threat to the validity of the study being performed and its study 
results. Data for this study will be kept only as long as the study is being 
conducted and analyzed for results. Once this information has been obtained all 
records will be discarded in accordance with hospital policy and applicable 
regulations. Within the consenting process the patient will be made aware that 
their information will be kept confidential and that the patient has the right to end 
their participation in the study at any point.  
 
6.3  
Regulatory and Ethical Considerations 
6.3.1 Risk Assessment 
Adverse events with these products are uncommon. The interventional 
products being used have been tested and studied for any adverse 
reactions. Sterile water can will be cooled in a refrigerator to “mimic” a 
cooling sensation when applied to the patient’s skin. The only foreseeable 
risk would be the perceived “cold” by the patient. Because the sterile 
water is sterile there is no risk to contamination of the skin after the 
researcher has applied the aseptic technique for accessing an intravenous 
catheter. The Gebauer Company, the manufacturer of the interventional 
vapocoolant ethyl chloride spray has indicated that it is extremely rare to 
have an adverse reaction to the ethyl chloride however cutaneous 
sensitization may occur. Freezing can occasionally alter skin 
pigmentation. A study has been published in the Journal of Hospital 
Infection titled the “Effects of vapocoolant spray on skin sterility prior to 
intravenous cannulation” which concluded that vapocoolant spray does not 
recontaminate the skin after disinfection, and should pose no increased 
risk of infection when used as an anesthetic agent prior to intravenous 
cannulation. (Evans, J.G., Taylor, D.M., Hurren, F., Ward, P., Yeoh, M., 
& Howden, B.P., 2015). 

 
10 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
The Gebauer Company list precautions when using the ethyl chloride 
spray specifically stated as: Do not spray in eyes. Inhalation of ethyl 
chloride should be avoided as it may produce narcotic and general 
anesthetic effects, and may produce deep anesthesia or fatal coma with 
respiratory or cardiac arrest. Ethyl chloride is flammable and should never 
be used in the presence of an open flame or electrical cautery equipment. 
When used to produce local freezing of tissues, adjacent skin areas should 
be protected by an application of petroleum. The thawing process may be 
painful, and freezing may lower local resistance to infection and delay 
healing. (Gabauer’s Ethyl Chloride Spray, 2016). 
The sub investigators for the study will monitor the patient for any 
potential reaction to the ethyl chloride spray. The most common reaction 
being temporary skin color changes at the spray site. Furthermore, the sub 
investigators will monitor for the very rare but severe allergic reactions 
that could occur including rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; 
tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue; 
decreased urination; symptoms of liver problems (eg, dark urine; loss of 
appetite; pale stools; stomach pain; unusual nausea or tiredness; yellowing 
of the skin or eyes). (Gebauer’s Ethyl Chloride Spray, 2016). (See 
Attachment 6- The Gebauer Company’s Safety Data Sheet (SDS). 
 
 
6.3.2 Potential Benefits of Study Participation 
The benefit to the patient who receives the intervention prior to IV 
cannulation can result in the possible reduction in pain during the IV 
access and/or the perception thereof. Knowledge gained from this research 
may help guide treatment guidelines in the future. 
 
 
6.3.3 Informed Consent/Assent and HIPPA Authorization 
In order to protect human rights this study will be conducted in full 
conformance with principles of “Declaration of Helsinki” and good 
clinical practice. This study will comply with all protocols set forth for 
research at Aultman Health Foundation under the guidance of the HRRB. 
7.0 
SAFETY MANAGEMENT  
 
7.1 
Adverse Events and Collection/Reporting 
The patients in this study will remain in the department for at least 2 hours 
following IV insertion to ensure that the sub investigators of the study have 
adequate time to monitor the patient pre-and post interventional spray specifically 
the use of the ethyl chloride spray to ensure no reaction has and/or will occur as it 
relates to the use of ethyl chloride. In the case that an adverse reaction would 
occur the Principle Investigator of the study Dr. Mitryan Kar would be contacted 
to assess and treat the patient for the reaction in question.  
 
7.2 
Data Safety Monitoring Plan 
The Principle Investigator will be responsible for oversight of this project. All 
Investigators will be trained on reporting and oversight of regulatory 

 
11 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
requirements. Data and outcomes produced by this research study will be 
monitored by the HRRB office on a regular basis. Data review will occur after the 
first three (3) patients and every 30 patients thereafter. The study will be 
registered on clinicaltrials.gov, with regular updates as required by regulations. 
8.0 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
Analysis for this study is a descriptive statistic of a covariance using pre-procedure 
perception as the covariance. A power analysis was completed and determined that a 
minimum sample with a level of significates of 0.5 moderate effect size is 30 subjects. 
Our goal for this study is to exceed that sample size and have up to 80 participants. 
Statistical assistance will be sought to assure accurate data input and complete data 
results.  
 
9.0 
OUTCOMES AND SIGNIFICANCE 
The intention of this study is to measure whether the use of a vapocoolant spray as an 
intervention increases the patient’s satisfaction of IV insertion and decrease the patient’s 
pain and/or perception thereof. This interventional study aims to show that the use of a 
vapocoolant spray prior to IV cannulation insertion will not only yield positive feedback 
from patients undergoing Nuclear Medicine scans but that such an intervention could 
change the traditional methods used for starting IV’s in hospitalized patients. 
Furthermore, this study can be used to compare the use of a vapocoolant spray versus 
current practice which is not using a vapocoolant spray on IV insertions. This comparison 
will lead to awareness in pain management for IV insertions as well as determine if such 
a spray is cost effective and necessary. 
 
 
 

 
12 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
10.0  REFERENCES 
1. 
Levitt, Francesca C., MSN, RN-BC, Ziemba-David, Mary (2013). An exploratory study 
of patient preferences for pain management during intravenous insertion: Maybe we 
should sweat the small stuff.  Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 28 (4), 223-232. 
2. 
Bio Logic Aqua Research Technologies International Inc. (2010). Nature’s Tears Eye 
Mist. Retrieved on February 2, 2017 from 
http://www.naturestears.com//pdf/NaturesTearsBrochure2010.pdf. 
3.  
Bio Logic Aqua Research Technologies International Inc. (2013, January 1). Nature's 
Tears Eye Mist. [Material Safety Data Sheet]. Retrieved from 
http://www.naturestears.com/MSDS/MSDS-BLARTI-USA-NT-2014.pdf 
4. 
Gebauer Company (2016). Ethyl Chloride. Retrieved from 
http://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/150313/docs/Ethyl_Chloride/Application/EC_English_IFU
.pdf. 
5. 
Gabauer Company. (2013, April 23). Ethyl Chloride. [Safety Data Sheet]. Retrieved from 
http://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/150313/docs/Ethyl_Chloride/Safety_Sheets/EC_English_S
DS.pdf 
6. 
Griffith, RJ., Herd, V., Herd, D., Reed, PW., & Dalziel, SR., (2016). Vapocoolants (cold 
spray) for pain treatment during intravenous cannulation. The Cochrane Collaboration, 4, 
1-20. 
7. 
Hogan, Mary-Ellen., BSCPHM, PHARMD, MSC, Smart, Sarah, BSC, MSC, Shah, 
Vibhuti., MD, MSC & Taddio, Anna., BSCPHM, MSC, PHD (2014). A systematic 
review of vapocoolants for reducing pain from venipuncture and venous cannulation in 
children and adults. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 47, (6), 736-749. 
8. 
Evans, J.G., Taylor, D.M., Hurren, F., Ward, P., Yeoh, M., & Howden, B.P. (2015). 
Effects of vapocoolant spray on skin sterility prior to intravenous cannulation. Journal of 
Hospital Infection, 90 (4), 333-337. 
9. 
Mace, S.E. (2016). Prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing 
vapocoolant spray vs placebo spray in adults undergoing venipuncture, American Journal 
of Emergency Medicine, 34, 798-804. 
10. 
Winfield, C., BSN, RN, CAPA, Knicely, C., BSN, RN, CAPA, Jensen, C., BSN, RN, 
CAPA, Taylor, S., RN, Thomas, K., BSN, RN, Conaway, M., PhD, Burns, S., MSN, RN, 
RRT, ACNP, CCRN, FCCM, FAANP, FAAN, & Quatrara, B., DNP, RN, ACNS-BC 
(2013). What is the least painful method of anesthetizing a peripheral IV site?  Journal of 
PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 28, (4), 217-222. 
 
 

 
13 
Vapocoolant Spray Used Prior to IV Cannulation 
Version: February 2, 2017 
11.0 
APPENDICES 
 
11.1 Attachment 1-Explanation of Research Study 
 
11.2 Attachment 2- Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Checklist 
 
11.3 Attachment 3- Consent Form 
 
11.4 Attachment 4- Patient Questionnaire and Researcher Documentation Form 
 
11.5 Attachment 5- Visual Pain and Satisfaction Scale 
 
11.6 Attachment 6- The Gebauer Company’s Safety Data Sheet (SDS). 
 
11.7 Attachment 7- Bio Logic Aqua Research Technologies International Inc. Monitor  
        Safety Data Sheet (MSDS).