Prospective Study of Colorectal Procedures With the Levita Magnetic Surgical System
Phase: NA
Conditions: Colorectal Procedures
Sponsor: Levita Magnetics

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 1 of 29 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prospective Study of Colorectal Procedures with 
the Levita Magnetic Surgical System 
 
 
 
Protocol Number: CP006 
Revision: A 
21 May 2019 
 
 
 
 
 
Sponsor: Levita Magnetics International Corporation 
 
Alberto Rodriguez-Navarro, MD  
 
Title: CEO and Founder 
 
Email: CP006@levita.com  
 
Telephone: +1 (650) 204-0529 
 
  
 
+569 8 4799140 
 
 
Sponsor Signature:    
 
 
Sponsor Name: Alberto Rodriguez-Navarro, MD 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT 
This study is confidential in nature. All information related to this study is considered 
proprietary and should not be made available to those not directly involved in this study. 
Authorized recipients of this information include Investigators and co-Investigators, 
other health care personnel necessary to conduct the study, and Clinical Investigation 
Ethics Committees and Institutional Review Boards. The personnel provided with data 
from this study are hereby informed of its confidential and proprietary nature. Release of 
these data to individuals other than those listed above requires the prior written 
permission of Levita Magnetics. 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 2 of 29 
PROTOCOL REVIEW PAGE 
 
 
STUDY TITLE: 
Prospective Study of Colorectal Procedures with the Levita 
Magnetic Surgical System 
 
PROTOCOL: 
CP006 
 
REVISION: 
A 
 
Investigator’s Statement: I agree to conduct this clinical study in accordance with the 
design and specific provisions of this protocol; modifications to the study or protocol are 
acceptable only with an approved protocol amendment. I agree to await Ethics 
Committee (EC) approval of the protocol and informed consent before initiating the 
study, to obtain informed consent from subjects prior to their enrollment in the study, to 
collect and record data as required by this protocol and case report forms, submit all 
reports as required by this protocol, provide the requested financial information, and to 
maintain study documentation for the period of time detailed in this protocol. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date of Signature: 
Investigator Signature: 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 3 of 29 
Protocol Synopsis 
 
Title: 
Prospective Study of Colorectal Procedures with the Levita 
Magnetic Surgical System 
Study Objective: 
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and 
effectiveness of the Levita Magnetic Surgical System in 
patients undergoing colorectal procedures. 
Study Design: 
Prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open label study 
designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Levita 
Magnetic Surgical System in colorectal procedures 
Enrollment Size 
and Number of 
Sites: 
30 subjects at up to three (3) clinical sites in Chile 
Subject Population: All patients at least 18 years of age presenting for elective 
colorectal surgery are potential candidates 
Primary Safety 
Endpoint: 
All adverse events will be captured and reported.  Adverse 
events will be further summarized by relatedness to the MSS 
devices and/or procedure, seriousness, and level of severity. 
Primary 
Effectiveness 
Endpoint: 
Ability to adequately retract the colon and, as needed, peri-
colorectal tissue and/or adjacent organs to achieve an effective 
exposure of the target tissue. 
 
Adequate retraction will be deemed to be achieved if it is not 
necessary to use another port to insert another instrument to 
retract the target tissues.     
Inclusion Criteria: 
Subjects must meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria to 
be eligible for participation in the study: 
• Subject is at least 18 years of age 
• Subject has a BMI of at least 20 kg/m2 
• Subject is scheduled to undergo elective colorectal 
procedure  
• Subject, or authorized representative, signs a written 
Informed Consent  Form (ICF) to participate in the study, 
prior to any study-required procedures 
Exclusion Criteria: 
Subjects must be EXCLUDED from participation in this study 
if ANY of the following exclusion criteria are met: 
• Subject has a BMI of more than 60 kg/m2 
• Emergency procedures (e.g., obstruction, severe 
bleeding or perforation) 
• Significant comorbidities: e.g. cardiovascular, 
neuromuscular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 
and urological disease (renal failure) 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 4 of 29 
• Subjects with pacemakers, defibrillators, or other 
electromedical implants 
• Subjects with ferromagnetic implants 
• Clinical history of impaired coagulation confirmed by 
abnormal blood tests 
• Subject has an anatomical abnormality noted after 
initiation of index procedure that would prevent device 
use  
• Subject is pregnant or wishes to become pregnant during 
the length of study participation  
• Subject is not likely to comply with the follow-up 
evaluation schedule 
• Subject is participating in a clinical trial of another 
investigational drug or device 
Study Duration / 
Follow-up Period 
Subjects will be followed for 30 days post-procedure, with 
follow-up visits at hospital discharge and at 7 and 30 days 
post-procedure. 
Study Principal 
Investigator 
I. Emre Gorgun, MD 
Cleveland Clinic 
Cleveland OH U.S.A. 
Site 
Principal 
Investigators*: 
Alejandro Readi, MD 
Hospital Salvador 
Santiago, Chile 
 
Alejandro Readi, MD 
Clinica Indisa 
Santiago, Chile 
Sponsor: 
Levita Magnetics International Corporation 
Alberto Rodriguez-Navarro, MD  
Title: CEO and Founder 
Email: CP006@levita.com 
Telephone: +1 (650) 204-0529 
* The third sites is pending.  An administrative update to the protocol will be made when 
an additional site is added. 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 5 of 29 
Investigator Agreement and Certification 
Levita Magnetic Surgical System Colorectal Procedures Study 
 
I agree to participate in the clinical investigation of the Magnetic Surgical System sponsored 
by Levita Magnetics (hereinafter “Study Sponsor”). I agree to conduct this investigation 
according to the requirements of the investigational plan provided by the Study Sponsor 
and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice requirements as outlined in ISO 14155 and 
conditions imposed by the reviewing Ethics Committee (EC). I agree to ensure informed 
consent is appropriately obtained from all subjects prior to inclusion in this study. 
 
I understand that this investigation will be monitored by the Study Sponsor and/or a 
designee employed by Study Sponsor. This monitoring will involve periodic inspection of 
my investigational site and ongoing review of the data that is submitted by me to Study 
Sponsor. I am also aware that I may be inspected by a representative of the U.S. Food and 
Drug Administration (FDA) or other regulatory authorities. 
 
I am aware that Study Sponsor reserves the right to discontinue this investigation at any 
time. 
 
My current curriculum vitae is attached along with the curriculum vitae of those physicians 
at this institution who will be using this investigational device or participating in this study as 
co-Investigators under my supervision. These include the extent and type of our relevant 
experience with pertinent dates and locations. 
 
I certify that I have not been involved in an investigation that was terminated for 
noncompliance at the insistence of Study Sponsor, this institution’s Ethics Committee (EC) 
or any regulatory authority. 
 
I understand that this investigation, protocol, and trial results are confidential and I agree 
not to disclose any such information to any person other than a representative of Study 
Sponsor or regulatory authority without the prior written consent of Study Sponsor. 
 
I will provide financial information by completing a Levita Financial Disclosure Form and 
update it as necessary. 
 
Accepted by 
Principal Investigator Signature 
Printed name 
date 
Co-Investigator Signature 
Printed name 
date 
Co-Investigator Signature 
Printed name 
Date 
Co-Investigator Signature 
Printed name 
date 
Co-Investigator Signature 
Printed name 
date 
Co-Investigator Signature 
Printed name 
date 
 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 6 of 29 
Table of Contents 
1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 8 
1.1 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ................................................................................... 8 
2 SURGICAL SYSTEM DEVICE DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 8 
3 INDICATION FOR USE .............................................................................................. 10 
4 STUDY PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................... 10 
5 STUDY ENDPOINTS.................................................................................................. 10 
5.1 
PRIMARY SAFETY ENDPOINT ..................................................................................... 10 
5.2 
PRIMARY EFFECTIVENESS ENDPOINT ........................................................................ 10 
5.3 
OTHER OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................. 10 
6 STUDY DESIGN ......................................................................................................... 11 
6.1 
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................... 11 
6.2 
SAMPLE SIZE AND NUMBER OF CENTERS .................................................................. 11 
6.3 
STUDY DURATION ..................................................................................................... 11 
7 STUDY PROCEDURES ............................................................................................. 11 
7.1 
SUBJECT ELIGIBILITY, PRE-SCREENING, AND EXCLUSIONS ......................................... 11 
7.2 
ENROLLMENT AND WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT ..................................................... 12 
7.3 
SCREENING/BASELINE EVALUATION .......................................................................... 12 
7.4 
PROCEDURE ............................................................................................................. 12 
7.5 
POST-PROCEDURE / HOSPITAL DISCHARGE............................................................... 13 
7.6 
FOLLOW-UP .............................................................................................................. 13 
7.7 
UNPLANNED FOLLOW-UP VISITS ................................................................................ 14 
7.8 
EARLY DISCONTINUATION / WITHDRAWAL .................................................................. 14 
7.9 
LOST TO FOLLOW-UP SUBJECTS ............................................................................... 14 
8 RISK / BENEFIT ANALYSIS ..................................................................................... 15 
8.1 
BENEFITS ................................................................................................................. 15 
8.2 
RISKS ...................................................................................................................... 15 
8.3 
MINIMIZATION OF RISK AND MONITORING PROCEDURES ............................................. 15 
9 STATISTICAL SECTION ........................................................................................... 16 
9.1 
STATISTICAL METHODS ............................................................................................. 16 
9.2 
SAMPLE SIZE JUSTIFICATION ..................................................................................... 16 
10 DATA MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 17 
10.1 
DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................................... 17 
10.2 
DATA PROCESSING ................................................................................................... 17 
11 MONITORING AND QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES .................................. 17 
11.1 
CONTROL OF SYSTEMIC ERROR/ BIAS ....................................................................... 17 
11.2 
MONITORING AND AUDITING ...................................................................................... 18 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 7 of 29 
11.3 
DEVICE ACCOUNTABILITY .......................................................................................... 19 
12 ADVERSE EVENTS ................................................................................................. 19 
12.1 
DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 19 
12.2 
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING ................................................................................... 20 
12.3 
ADVERSE EVENT SEVERITY ...................................................................................... 21 
12.4 
EVENT RELATIONSHIP ............................................................................................... 22 
12.5 
SUBJECT DEATH ....................................................................................................... 23 
12.6 
DEVICE DEFICIENCY ................................................................................................. 23 
13 STUDY OVERSIGHT ............................................................................................... 24 
13.1 
PHYSICIAN ADJUDICATOR ......................................................................................... 24 
14 STUDY ADMINISTRATION...................................................................................... 24 
14.1 
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE .................................................................................... 24 
14.2 
ETHICS COMMITTEE (EC) APPROVAL ........................................................................ 24 
14.3 
INFORMED CONSENT ................................................................................................ 25 
14.4 
AMENDING THE PROTOCOL ....................................................................................... 25 
14.5 
PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS/VIOLATIONS AND MEDICAL EMERGENCIES ............................ 26 
14.6 
PRE-STUDY DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS.......................................................... 26 
14.7 
RECORD RETENTION ................................................................................................ 26 
14.8 
CRITERIA FOR TERMINATING STUDY .......................................................................... 27 
14.9 
CRITERIA FOR SUSPENDING/TERMINATING AN INVESTIGATIONAL SITE ........................ 27 
14.10 PUBLICATION POLICY ................................................................................................ 27 
14.11 SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................... 27 
14.12 INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................. 28 
15 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 29 
16 REVISION HISTORY................................................................................................ 29 
 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 8 of 29 
1 
INTRODUCTION 
1.1 
Background and Rationale 
The Magnetic Surgical System (MSS) has been shown to retract soft tissue 
and organs and enable a reduction in the number of ports when used in 
laparoscopic procedures including cholecystectomy (Rivas et al.), bariatric 
surgery (Guerron et al.) and prostatectomy procedures (Diaz et al) and is 
cleared for commercial use (FDA clearance) for these indications in the 
United States.  In these procedures, the MSS is used to grasp and retract soft 
tissues and organs so that the surgeon can visualize and access the target 
site of the surgery (i.e., gallbladder, liver, prostate or periprostatic tissues, 
respectively).   
 
Tissue retraction is also needed in colorectal surgical procedures.   This study 
is intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Magnetic Surgical 
System in colorectal procedures. 
 
As no dedicated abdominal wall port is needed to use the MSS as a tissue 
retractor, a reduction in the number of ports required for the surgery, with the 
attendant benefits of this reduction, is anticipated. 
 
2 
SURGICAL SYSTEM DEVICE DESCRIPTION 
The Levita Magnetic Surgical System is composed of two hand-held instruments: 
a Magnetic Grasper and an external Magnetic Controller.  
 
The Magnetic Grasper (Figure 1) is comprised of two main components: a 
detachable Grasper Tip and a Shaft.  Once the Magnetic Grasper is inserted and 
the Grasper Tip grasps the desired tissue, the detachable Grasper Tip can be 
detached from the Shaft and controlled externally using the Magnetic Controller.  
Traction of the tissue is maintained through the magnetic field attraction between 
the Grasper Tip and the Magnetic Controller. The Grasper Tip may be 
repositioned when needed using the Magnetic Grasper shaft or conventional 
(non-MSS) graspers.  The Magnetic Grasper is compatible with a ≥ 10 mm 
laparoscopic port. 
 
The Magnetic Controller (Figure 2) is a single unit with handles that is held 
external to the body and emits a magnetic field that attracts the detachable 
Grasper Tip. Once the Grasper Tip is attached to the desired tissue and 
detached from the Shaft, the Magnetic Controller is placed external to the body to 
magnetically attract the Grasper Tip to manipulate the target tissue. Adjusting the 
distance between the Magnetic Controller and the Grasper Tip will modulate the 
magnetic attraction used for tissue retraction/manipulation. The Magnetic 
Controller can then be moved freely, facilitating unrestricted shaft-less tissue 
retraction.  If desired, the user can connect the Magnetic Controller to a 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 9 of 29 
commercially available surgical support arm that is compatible with a hexagon-
shaped mounting stem.   
 
Figure 1. Magnetic Grasper 
 
 
 
Figure 2. Magnetic Controller 
 
 
The Magnetic Grasper is actuated via its handle with two distinct scissor-type 
motions to open and close the Jaws and to disengage the detachable Grasper 
Tip from the Shaft.  The Magnetic Grasper can be used for retraction in the same 
manner as a conventional laparoscopic tissue grasper, or its Grasper Tip can be 
released and used with the external Magnetic Controller.  When the Grasper Tip 
is detached from the Shaft, the Shaft can be removed and retraction of the tissue 
can be achieved through the magnetic attraction between the Grasper Tip and 
1 
2 
3 
4 
6.5 cm 
47 cm 
10 cm 
1. Shaft 
2. Grasper Tip 
3. Jaws 
4. Handle 
10 mm 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 10 of 29 
the external Magnetic Controller. This access port is therefore available for use 
with other surgical tools.  When the procedure is completed, the Grasper Tip is 
decoupled from the Magnetic Controller and the Shaft may be reinserted to 
retrieve the Grasper Tip from the patient. 
3 
INDICATION FOR USE 
The Magnetic Surgical System is designed to grasp and retract the colon, peri-
colorectal tissues, and adjacent organs in colorectal procedures to facilitate 
access to and visualization of the surgical site. The device is indicated for use in 
patients within a BMI range of 20 - 60 kg/m2. 
4 
STUDY PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE 
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the 
Magnetic Surgical System as a soft tissue and organ retractor in colorectal 
procedures. 
5 
STUDY ENDPOINTS 
The following endpoints will be evaluated in all enrolled subjects who undergo 
colorectal procedures using the Magnetic Surgical System.  
5.1 
Primary Safety Endpoint 
All adverse events will be captured and reported.  Adverse events will be 
further summarized by relatedness to the MSS devices and/or procedure, 
seriousness, and level of severity. 
5.2 
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 
Ability to adequately retract the colon and, as needed, peri-colorectal 
tissue and/or adjacent organs to achieve an effective exposure of the 
target tissue. 
 
Adequate retraction will be deemed to be achieved if it is not necessary to 
use another port to insert another instrument to retract the target tissues.     
Other Outcome Assessments 
• Operative time  
• Number of ports/incisions, and as compared to surgeon’s standard of care 
(SOC) for this surgery type 
• Time spent in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) 
• Length of stay (LOS) (time from admittance to post-anesthesia care unit 
until hospital discharge) 
• Conversion rate (conversion to an open procedure due to inadequate 
MSS performance) 
• Estimated blood loss 
• Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rates 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 11 of 29 
• Device malfunctions 
• Subject satisfaction 
• Investigator satisfaction with the MSS’s ability to retract intended tissues 
and facilitate visualization of surgical site 
 
6 
STUDY DESIGN 
6.1 
Overview 
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open label study designed to 
assess the safety and effectiveness of the Levita Magnetic Surgical System in 
colorectal procedures. 
6.2 
Sample Size and Number of Centers 
The study will be conducted at up to three (3) study sites with a target 
maximum of 30 subjects in which the Levita Magnetic Surgical System is 
used for colorectal procedures. 
6.3 
Study Duration 
Enrollment of subjects in this study is anticipated to take up to 6 months. 
Clinical follow-up evaluations will be conducted at discharge, and 7 and 30 
days following surgery. The total study duration is expected to be 
approximately 7 months. 
7 
STUDY PROCEDURES 
7.1 
Subject Eligibility, Pre-Screening, and Exclusions 
All subjects presenting for elective colorectal procedures are potential 
candidates, and will be screened for eligibility. A Screening/Enrollment Log 
will be provided to the study sites to maintain a cumulative tracking of all 
screened subjects. 
 
Subjects must meet all study entrance criteria for enrollment in the clinical 
study. Reasons for screening failure(s) will be documented. 
7.1.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
Subjects must meet ALL of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible 
for participation in the study: 
1. Subject is at least 18 years of age 
2. Subject has a BMI of at least 20 kg/m2 
3. Subject is scheduled to undergo elective colorectal procedure  
4. Subject, or authorized representative, signs a written Informed 
Consent  Form (ICF) to participate in the study, prior to any 
study-required procedures 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 12 of 29 
7.1.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
Subjects must be EXCLUDED from participation in this study if ANY of 
the following exclusion criteria are met: 
1. Subject has a BMI of over 60 kg/m2 
2. Emergency procedures (e.g., obstruction, severe bleeding or 
perforation) 
3. Significant comorbidities: e.g. cardiovascular, neuromuscular, 
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and urological disease 
(renal failure) 
4. Subjects with pacemakers, defibrillators, or other electromedical 
implants 
5. Subjects with ferromagnetic implants 
6. Clinical history of impaired coagulation confirmed by abnormal 
blood tests 
7. Subject has an anatomical abnormality noted after initiation of 
index procedure that would prevent device use  
8. Subject is pregnant or wishes to become pregnant during the 
length of study participation  
9. Subject is not likely to comply with the follow-up evaluation 
schedule 
10. Subject is participating in a clinical trial of another investigational 
drug or device 
7.2 
Enrollment and Written Informed Consent 
Patients who meet initial eligibility criteria will be asked to sign the Informed 
Consent Form before any study-specific tests or procedures are performed. 
The Investigator will inform the potential subject of the elements of the clinical 
study, including risks, potential benefits and required follow-up procedures, 
prior to obtaining the potential subject’s informed consent. 
7.3 
Baseline Evaluation 
The Baseline visit will occur within 30 days prior to the index procedure. 
 
The following evaluations are required at this visit: 
• Demographic Information: gender, race, age, weight, height, and smoking 
status 
• Medical / Surgical History 
• Pre-operative blood draw for determination of coagulation disorders  
• Urine pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential.  Note that if the 
screening test is more than 1 week prior to the index procedure, a second 
urine pregnancy test is required within 7 days of the index procedure. 
7.4 
Procedure 
The Investigator will perform the surgical procedure in accordance with the 
methods detailed in the Instructions for Use (IFU). 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 13 of 29 
The following intra-operative data will be collected: 
• General anesthesia time 
• Operative time (from the first incision to the last suture’s placement) 
• Device and procedure observations  
• Conversion to open surgical procedure and reason for conversion 
• Number of ports utilized 
• Number of ports typically utilized according to surgeon’s SOC for specific 
surgical procedure 
• The need for an additional port to place another retractor to retract the 
colon, peri-colorectal tissues or adjacent organs 
• Estimated blood loss 
• Video recording of the overall procedure 
• Adverse events 
7.5 
Post-Procedure / Hospital Discharge 
• Investigator satisfaction with the MSS’s ability to retract intended tissues 
and facilitate visualization and access of the surgical site 
 
Before hospital discharge the following data will be collected: 
• Length of hospital stay (time from admittance to post-anesthesia care unit 
until hospital discharge) 
• Length of time spent in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) 
• SSI 
• Adverse events, if any 
7.6 
Follow-up 
All subjects will be asked to return to the investigational site at 7 days and 
again at 30 days post-procedure according to the study schedule described in 
Table 1. Subjects will be queried about satisfaction with the MSS facilitated 
procedure at the 30 day visit and about adverse events at both study visits.  
Study visits should be scheduled as closely as possible to the earlier part of 
the visit window to allow for rescheduling if needed due to last minute 
schedule changes. Visits not completed within the specified visit window will 
be regarded as protocol deviations.  
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 14 of 29 
Table 1: Schedule of Assessments 
Assessment 
Time Frame 
Pre-op 
Baseline 
Index 
Procedure  
7 day follow-up 
30 day follow-up 
Visit Window 
- 30 days 
NA 
± 3 days 
± 7 days 
Informed Consent 
√ 
 
 
 
Medical History 
√ 
 
 
 
Demographics 
√ 
 
 
 
Blood Tests 
√ 
 
 
 
Pregnancy Test * 
 √ 
√ 
 
 
Intra-operative 
assessments 
 
√ 
 
 
Adverse events 
 
√ 
√ 
√ 
Investigator 
satisfaction 
 
√ 
 
 
Subject satisfaction 
 
 
 
√ 
 
* Urine pregnancy test for all women of childbearing potential at pre-op visit 
and repeated within 7 days of index procedure unless pre-op visit/prior urine 
pregnancy test was within 7 days of index procedure. 
  
 
 
7.7 
Unplanned Follow-up Visits 
Subjects returning for unscheduled visits will be reported on the Unscheduled 
Visit case report form.  
7.8 
Early Discontinuation / Withdrawal  
All subjects will be informed of their right to withdraw from the clinical study at 
any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise 
entitled. Additionally, the Investigator may prematurely discontinue any 
subject’s participation in the study if the Investigator believes that the subject 
can no longer fully comply with the requirements of the study or if any of the 
study procedures are deemed potentially harmful to the subject. The reason 
for early discontinuation will be documented in the source documents and the 
Study Termination case report form. 
7.9 
Lost to Follow-up Subjects 
Every attempt will be made to have all subjects complete the follow-up visit 
schedule. A subject will not be considered lost to follow-up unless efforts to 
obtain compliance are unsuccessful. At a minimum, the effort to obtain follow-
up information will include three attempts to make contact via telephone or 
email and if unsuccessful, then a certified letter from the Investigator will be 
sent to the subject’s last known address. In general, the study Site 
Coordinator should attempt to contact the subject after each missed visit to 
reschedule the visit. 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 15 of 29 
8 
RISK / BENEFIT ANALYSIS 
8.1 
Benefits 
Possible benefits of the Levita Magnetic Surgical System are a reduction in 
the number of surgical ports needed to perform the surgery, with associated 
reduction in post-operative pain and scarring, a shorter length of stay in the 
hospital, and a faster recovery.  
8.2 
Risks 
There are risks associated with use of the Levita Magnetic Surgical System 
including: 
• Electromagnetic field incompatibility or interference  
• Malfunctioning of the device 
• Breakage of the device 
• Allergic reaction related to the device 
• Abdominal wall/cavity/tissue and/or organ injury or damage (e.g. 
inflammation, redness) 
• Infection 
• Tissue damage, including hematoma, bleeding or petechiae 
• Vascular injury 
• Gastro-intestinal injury 
• Organ perforation 
• Need for extended surgery 
• Additional surgical intervention due to any of the above factors (includes 
reoperation) 
 
These adverse events do not include all adverse events, which occur with 
surgery in general, but are important considerations particular to laparoscopic 
instrumentation. 
 
8.3 
Minimization of Risk and Monitoring Procedures 
The MSS has been evaluated in clinical studies of cholecystectomy, bariatric 
surgery, and prostatectomy and has been in commercial distribution for over 
two years.  
 
Risks are mitigated in this clinical study through selection of qualified 
physicians with competence in minimally invasive surgery, appropriate 
training, and study monitoring. 
• Investigators who participate in the study will be experienced and skilled in 
laparoscopic 
surgical 
techniques. 
Additionally, 
Investigators, 
in 
conjunction with the investigational site, will have adequate resources for 
participation in a clinical study. 
• The study has been designed to ensure treatment and follow-up of 
subjects are consistent with current medical practice. 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 16 of 29 
• Each Investigator will ensure oversight and approval of the study by the 
Ethics Committee (EC) prior to initiation of the clinical study at his/her 
investigational site. 
• The Investigator and study personnel will be trained on the clinical 
protocol. 
• All Investigators will undergo training prior to first use during the clinical 
study. 
• All Investigators and Operating Room (OR) support personnel will be 
provided with an IFU during training and as a reference for review as 
needed. 
▪ The IFU details appropriate safe working zones for use of the 
Magnetic Controller in an OR setting and considerations for users 
of a product with a strong magnet.  
• 
Study personnel are also trained with and receive a “Magnetic Surgery 
Screening Checklist” and OR signage to ensure safe use of the system for 
subjects and users. 
• Subjects will be carefully evaluated against the inclusion/exclusion criteria 
prior to entering the clinical study to ensure that their diagnosis and 
medical status are appropriate for participation in the clinical study. 
• Subjects will be monitored up to the 30-day follow-up visit as defined in 
the study protocol. The follow-up visit will be with an Investigator to 
monitor the subjects’ status.  
• A study Investigator will evaluate the subject for any adverse events 
potentially related to the device. 
• Data from the investigative sites will be monitored throughout the study. 
Monitoring visits will be conducted at the investigative sites at the initiation 
of the study and periodically throughout the study to evaluate protocol 
compliance and to determine if there are any issues that may affect the 
safety or welfare of the subjects. 
9 
STATISTICAL SECTION 
9.1 
Statistical Methods 
Data collected in the study will be presented using various descriptive 
statistics. Descriptive summaries will be the basis of study reports to generate 
an overall summary of the safety and effectiveness for the device.  
 
Descriptive tables will be produced for baseline characteristics including 
demographics and medical history. 
 
Missing data on study endpoints will be described.  
9.2 
Sample Size Justification 
This is a single-arm, multicenter, investigational study. No formal sample size 
estimation has been performed.  As safety and effectiveness have already 
been 
demonstrated 
in 
several 
prior 
indications 
(laparoscopic 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 17 of 29 
cholecystectomy, bariatric and prostate procedures), it is expected that 
enrollment of 30 subjects will provide ample evidence of safe and effective 
use of the MSS in this additional subject population. 
10 
DATA MANAGEMENT 
10.1 Data Collection 
Data will be collected on paper case report forms (CRF) supplied by the 
Sponsor. The Site Principal Investigator is responsible for the accuracy and 
completeness of all study documentation. 
 
Corrections to the CRF must be corrected by drawing a single line through 
the incorrect data, entering the correct data beside the incorrect entry, then 
initialing and dating the correction. Incorrect data must not be obscured. The 
use of pencil, erasable ink, or correction fluid on CRFs is prohibited. All fields 
must be completed, e.g. if the item was not done, mark “N/D”. If the item is 
not applicable to an individual case, mark the field “N/A”. 
 
CRFs will be printed on 3-part NCR paper (or equivalent) so that both the site 
and monitor/Sponsor will have copies of the CRFs.  The second copy may be 
sent to the Sponsor for remote monitoring.  Any other subject information sent 
to the Sponsor must be redacted of personal identification information. 
 
A unique study number will be assigned to each subject. All information 
recorded on the CRF about the subject will be recorded with the study 
number on it. The main database will contain only the study number to 
identify the subject. The code with subject name and study number will be 
maintained in a secured designated location at the site and will be inspected 
by study monitors and auditors. Any computerized data will be password 
protected. 
 
The Sponsor will be responsible for database design and management. 
10.2 Data Processing 
Monitoring, described below, will be completed prior to data entry.  In 
association with data entry, the data will be reviewed for further 
inconsistencies or incongruities.  If warranted, a data clarification form or 
communication will be used to query the Investigator. Data will be either 
100% audited or double data entry will be used to ensure accurate and 
complete study information. 
11 
MONITORING AND QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 
11.1 Control of Systemic Error/ Bias 
Clinical monitors will verify subject data and ensure compliance with Good 
Clinical Practices (GCPs), clinical protocol and other study requirements.  As 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 18 of 29 
detailed in Section 13, an Independent Physician will adjudicate all adverse 
events for relatedness, severity, and seriousness. The adjudication results will 
be used for purposes of data analysis.  The Site Investigator’s analysis will 
also be presented in the final clinical study report. 
11.2 Monitoring and Auditing 
Monitoring visits to the clinical sites will be made periodically during the study, 
to ensure that all aspects of the current, approved protocol/amendment(s) are 
followed. 
 
Prior to the enrollment of any subject in this study, site study personnel will be 
trained to Good Clinical Practice, the protocol and the device including 
Instructions For Use and management of a magnetic device.  Additionally, the 
procedure for obtaining informed consent and the procedure for reporting 
adverse events will be reviewed.  
 
Site monitoring visits will be performed by the Monitor on a regular basis 
during which case report forms will be 100% verified against source 
documentation. Data will be reviewed for safety information, legibility, 
completeness, accuracy, and logical consistency. Additional computer 
programs (e.g. edit checks) that identify selected protocol violations, out-of-
range data, and other data errors may be used to help monitor the trial. 
Investigators will be required to make corrections to any data errors. 
 
The Monitor is responsible for ensuring, through personal contact with the 
Investigator and site personnel, that the members of the clinical staff clearly 
understand and accept the obligations incurred in this investigation, and that 
these obligations are being fulfilled throughout the study. Specifically, the 
Monitor will interact with the site via telephone contact and periodic on-site 
visits to ensure that: 
• Study facilities continue to be acceptable for the conduct of the study 
• Regulatory and study documents are complete and current 
• The protocol is appropriately followed 
• Protocol amendments have been approved by the EC and the local 
regulatory authorities (as applicable), and the Sponsor has received the 
approval in writing 
• Qualified subjects are enrolled in a timely manner 
• Accurate, complete, and current records are maintained for all subjects 
• The information recorded and submitted to the Sponsor is representative 
of the subject record and other supporting documentation 
• Inconsistent and incomplete data are addressed and resolved 
• Accurate, complete, and timely adverse event reports are being made to 
the Sponsor 
• The site Principal Investigator continues to assume primary responsibility 
for the study 
• Study devices are properly stored, dispensed, and accounted for 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 19 of 29 
 
The Investigator or designee must, upon request, provide to the Monitor or 
regulatory authority the necessary study records for a thorough review of the 
study’s progress. These records include, but are not limited to, case 
report forms and original documents and records such as hospital and 
clinic charts, consent forms, laboratory records, and pharmacy dispensing 
records. 
 
The Monitor will provide a written report to the Sponsor after each on-site 
visit. The report will identify the personnel participating in the visit, the 
activities performed, any protocol deviations, and any action items/corrective 
actions identified. 
 
If compliance problems or protocol deviations are noted, the Sponsor will 
recommend corrective action. If the response from the Investigator is not 
adequate, the Sponsor will terminate the site’s participation in the study and 
notify the regulatory authorities (if applicable). 
 
The study may also be subject to a quality assurance audit by the Sponsor or 
its designees, as well as inspection by appropriate regulatory authorities. 
 
It is important that the Investigator and relevant study personnel are available 
during the monitoring visits and possible audits and that sufficient time is 
devoted to the process. 
11.3 Device Accountability 
Study devices must be used according to the protocol, Instructions for Use 
and Training. 
 
The site Principal Investigator or an authorized designee shall keep records 
documenting the use of the study device by indicating the lot number on each 
subject’s case report form. 
12 
ADVERSE EVENTS 
12.1 Definitions 
12.1.1 Adverse Event (AE) 
AEs are any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, 
or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in 
which subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the 
study medical device.  This definition includes events related to the 
procedures involved.  For users or other persons, this definition is 
restricted to events related to study medical devices. 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 20 of 29 
All adverse events, regardless of relationship to the device, must be 
recorded on the case report forms provided. Adverse events that occur 
during this study should be treated by established standards of care. 
 
Adverse events shall be assessed and documented at the time of the 
procedure and at all study follow-up visits. Each Investigator shall 
provide source documentation as requested by the Sponsor to facilitate 
reporting and adjudication of these events. 
12.1.2 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) 
An adverse event is considered a SAE if it: 
• Led to death 
• Led to a serious deterioration in the health of the subject, that either 
resulted in: 
a) A life-threatening illness or injury, or 
b) A permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 
c) In-patient 
hospitalization, 
or 
prolongation 
of 
existing 
hospitalization, or  
d) medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent life-
threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to body 
structure or a body function. 
• Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality 
 
Planned hospitalization for a pre-existing condition, without serious 
deterioration in health, is not considered a serious adverse event. 
12.1.3 Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) 
A serious adverse device effect is defined as an adverse event related to 
the use of an study medical device that has resulted in any of the 
consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event.   
 
12.1.4 Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) 
An USADE is a serious adverse device effect which by its nature, 
incidence, severity or outcome has not been identified in the current 
version of the investigational plan. 
 
12.2 Adverse Event Reporting 
Any adverse event that occurs during the course of the study must be 
reported using the Adverse Event (AE) Form in the CRFs and the Investigator 
must sign each report. The Investigator must determine whether the adverse 
event is serious or unanticipated, its intensity, and the relationship of each 
adverse event to the study device or procedure.   As noted in Section 13, an 
Independent Physician Adjudicator will also adjudicate all AE data. 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 21 of 29 
Pre-existing medical conditions or symptoms occurring prior to the 
laparoscopic procedure involving the Levita MSS should not be reported as 
adverse events, unless there is a worsening of the pre-existing medical 
condition. 
 
All serious adverse events, including unanticipated serious adverse device 
effects, must be reported to the Sponsor within 24 hours of the site first 
becoming aware of the event via email (CP006@levita.com).  At a minimum, 
the AE CRF should be provisionally completed, scanned and sent via email. 
The Sponsor will contact the site for additional information, if required. 
 
For any adverse event that is ongoing at the time of the initial report, periodic 
follow-up information is required until the adverse event is resolved or is not 
expected to change. The site should submit relevant follow-up information 
related to the adverse event as soon as it is available. 
 
Depending upon the nature and seriousness of the adverse event, the 
Sponsor may request the Investigator to provide copies of the subject’s 
medical records (such as the subject’s laboratory tests and hospital records, 
Investigator summaries, etc.) to document the adverse event. The Sponsor 
and/or Sponsor designated clinical/medical personnel are available to 
respond to any medical issues that arise during the conduct of this study. 
 
The Investigator will report all serious adverse events, including unanticipated 
serious adverse device effects, to the EC according to the EC requirements. 
A copy of this EC communication should be sent to the Sponsor. 
 
Within 10 working days of notification, the Sponsor will report all unanticipated 
adverse device effects to the appropriate authority, all participating 
Investigators, and all reviewing ECs. The Sponsor will ensure that safety 
reporting for the study is conducted in compliance with all pertinent 
requirements and regulations. 
12.3 Adverse Event Severity 
The Investigator must determine the severity of the adverse event according 
to the following definitions: 
 
Mild The adverse event is noticeable to the subject, but 
does not interfere with routine activity; the symptoms 
are easily tolerated and transient in nature. 
 
Moderate The adverse event interferes with routine activity but 
responds to symptomatic therapy or rest; the 
symptoms are poorly tolerated and sustained. 
 
Severe The adverse event significantly limits the subject’s 
ability 
to 
perform 
routine 
activities 
despite 
symptomatic therapy. The adverse event requires 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 22 of 29 
medical 
or 
surgical 
treatment 
or 
results 
in 
hospitalization. 
 
Life-Threatening The subject is at immediate risk of death. 
12.4 Event Relationship 
The following lists the potential event attribution categories. 
12.4.1 Device Related 
An adverse event is considered device-related when the clinical event 
has a reasonable time sequence associated with use of the study device 
and is unlikely to be attributed to concurrent disease or other procedures 
or medications. It is reasonable to believe that the device directly caused 
or contributed to the adverse event. 
 
The Investigator will evaluate the relationship of the adverse event to the 
Levita MSS according to the following definitions: 
 
Definite The adverse event is clearly related to the study 
device: the event has a temporal relationship to the 
study device, follows a known pattern of response, or 
is otherwise logically related to the study device, and 
no alternative cause is present. 
 
Probable The adverse event is likely related to the study 
device: the event has a temporal relationship to the 
study device, follows a known or suspected pattern of 
response, or is otherwise logically related to the study 
device, but an alternative cause may be present. 
 
 Not likely The adverse event is unlikely related to the study 
device: the event does not follow a clear temporal 
relationship to the study device or does not follow a 
known pattern of response, or is otherwise likely to be 
due to the subject’s clinical state or other modes of 
therapy. 
 
Not related The adverse event is clearly not related to the study 
device: the event has no temporal or other 
relationship to the administration of the study device, 
follows no known or suspected pattern of response, 
and an alternative cause is present. 
 
Unknown Unable to determine the relationship based on all 
available information. 
12.4.2 Procedure-Related 
An adverse event is considered to be procedure-related when it is 
reasonable to believe that the event is associated with the index 
procedure and is not specific to the study device. Other products, 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 23 of 29 
surgical techniques, or medications required specifically for the 
procedure may have contributed to the occurrence of the event. 
 
The Investigator will evaluate the relationship of the adverse event to the 
procedure according to the following definitions: 
 
Definite The adverse event is clearly related to the procedure: 
the event has a temporal relationship to the 
procedure, follows a known pattern of response, or is 
otherwise logically related to the procedure, and no 
alternative cause is present. 
 
Probable The adverse event is likely related to the procedure: 
the event has a temporal relationship to the 
procedure, follows a known or suspected pattern of 
response, or is otherwise logically related to the 
procedure, but an alternative cause may be present. 
 
Not likely The adverse event is unlikely related to the 
procedure: the event does not follow a clear temporal 
relationship to the procedure or does not follow a 
known pattern of response, or is otherwise likely to be 
due to the subject’s clinical state or other modes of 
therapy. 
 
Not related The adverse event is clearly not related to the 
procedure: the event has no temporal or other 
relationship to the procedure, follows no known or 
suspected pattern of response, and an alternative 
cause is present. 
 
Unknown Unable to determine the relationship based on all 
available information. 
 
12.5 Subject Death 
Any subject death during the investigation must be reported to the Sponsor 
within 24 hours of Investigator’s knowledge of the death. The Adverse Event 
CRF must be completed and include a complete description of the relevant 
details of the death. A copy of the death records, death certificates and an 
autopsy report (if performed) are required to be sent to the Sponsor. In 
addition, subject death must be reported to the EC in accordance with EC 
requirements. 
12.6 Device Deficiency 
All device deficiencies related to the identity, quality, durability, reliability, 
safety or performance (includes malfunctions, use errors, and inadequate 
labeling) of the device shall be documented. Sponsor will assess all device 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 24 of 29 
deficiencies that could have led to a serious adverse device effect for 
potential regulatory reporting requirements. 
 
In the event of a suspected malfunction or device deficiency, the study device 
should be returned to the Sponsor for analysis. Instructions for returning the 
study device will be provided by the Sponsor. 
13 
STUDY OVERSIGHT 
13.1 Physician Adjudicator 
An Independent Physician Adjudicator will be responsible for the adjudication 
of all reported adverse events. The Independent Physician Adjudicator will be 
a General Surgeon familiar with laparoscopic surgery who is not an 
Investigator in the trial and does not have a financial conflict of interest with 
the Sponsor. The adjudication process will include determination of device 
and procedure relatedness, seriousness, and severity of the adverse event. If 
there is insufficient evidence to make these determinations, the Physician 
Adjudicator may choose to request additional information.  All available data 
will be presented for review to the Independent Physician Adjudicator. 
14 
STUDY ADMINISTRATION 
14.1 Statement of Compliance 
The clinical investigations will be in accordance with the ethical principles of 
the Declaration of Helsinki (October 2013), ISO 14155:2011 and ICH-GCP 
Guidelines.  The clinical investigation shall not commence until approval by 
the EC.  Any additional requirements imposed by the EC or regulatory 
authority shall be followed. The Sponsor shall maintain a Clinical Trial Liability 
Policy with an insurance company. 
14.2 Ethics Committee (EC) Approval 
The study protocol shall be reviewed and approved by the Investigator’s EC 
prior to subject enrollment. All proposed changes to the investigational plan 
must be reviewed and approved by the Sponsor in writing prior to 
implementation. Significant changes to the investigational plan must be 
approved in writing by the Sponsor and the EC prior to implementation. A 
significant change is one which may increase the risk or present a new risk to 
a subject, or which may adversely affect the scientific validity of the study. 
 
Prior to shipment of study devices, a signed copy of the EC approval letter 
identifying the clinical study and investigational site is required to be 
submitted to the Sponsor. Investigators are responsible for obtaining and 
maintaining annual renewal of the study by their EC (or according to renewal 
schedule imposed by the EC). Evidence of renewal and continued EC 
approval must be provided to the Sponsor accordingly. 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 25 of 29 
14.3 Informed Consent 
Written informed consent is mandatory and must be obtained from all 
subjects as per local regulations, prior to their participation in the study. A 
sample of the Informed Consent is provided to each investigational site. 
 
It is the responsibility of the Investigator to ensure written informed consent 
from each subject, or the legally authorized representative of the subject, is 
obtained prior to the initiation of any study-related procedures. 
 
Study participation is voluntary, and refusal to participate will involve no 
penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled. 
 
Study personnel fully knowledgeable in the purposes and procedures of the 
study will approach all prospective study participants. The facilities and 
settings in which prospective participants will be presented with the 
opportunity to learn about and consent to participation in the study will provide 
them sufficient quiet and unhurried time to be informed of the study and to 
ask questions prior to the initiation of study procedures. Study personnel will, 
after presenting the study to prospective participants, assess the subject’s 
understanding and autonomy by asking the subject to explain the study in 
his/her own words. 
 
Once that step is completed, consent will be able to be given by the subject 
signing the consent form. A copy of the consent form will be given to all 
consented participants. 
 
Signed subject consent forms must be retained in the study files by the 
Investigator, and be available for review by the Sponsor and/or regulatory 
agencies, as applicable. 
 
The informed consent form and any other written information provided to 
subjects will be revised whenever important new information becomes 
available, or if there is an amendment to the protocol which necessitates a 
change to the content of subject information and/or to the consent form. The 
Investigator will inform the subject of changes in a timely manner, and will ask 
the subject to confirm his/her continuation in the study by signing a revised 
consent form. 
 
Any revised informed consent form and other written information provided to 
subjects must receive approval from the EC and Sponsor prior to use. 
14.4 Amending the Protocol 
This protocol is to be followed exactly, and will only be altered by written 
amendments. Amendments must be approved by all parties responsible for 
approving the protocol prior to implementation. The Informed Consent and 
CRFs will be reviewed to ensure these are amended if necessary. 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 26 of 29 
 
Administrative changes that do not affect the benefit/risk ratio or scientific 
validity of the study (e.g., editorial changes for clarity) may be made with just 
approval from the Sponsor and will be documented as a protocol revision. 
14.5 Protocol Deviations/Violations and Medical Emergencies 
A protocol deviation or violation is a failure to comply with the requirements of 
the clinical study as specified in the protocol. Examples of protocol deviations 
include late visits, missed visits, and required follow-up testing not completed. 
An example of a protocol violation includes enrollment of a study subject who 
fails to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria as specified in the protocol or failure 
to obtain informed consent. Each Investigator shall conduct this clinical study 
in accordance with the study protocol and any conditions required by the 
reviewing EC. 
 
Deviations/violations from clinical protocol requirements will be reviewed and 
evaluated on an ongoing basis and, as necessary, appropriate corrective 
actions put into place. The Sponsor accepts the right of the Investigator to 
deviate from the protocol in an emergency when necessary to safeguard the 
life or the physical well-being of a study subject but such deviation must be 
reported within 24 hours of implementation to the EC and Sponsor.  
14.6 Pre-Study Documentation Requirements 
Prior to study enrollment, the following documents must be provided to the 
Sponsor: 
• Signed protocol/protocol amendments 
• Signed and dated Investigator Agreement(s) 
• A copy of the written EC approval of the protocol 
• A copy of the written EC approval of the Informed Consent Form 
• Signed and dated Curriculum Vitae of the Investigator(s) 
• Copy of the Investigator(s)’ current medical license(s), or equivalent 
• Signed and dated Non-disclosure Agreement(s), if required 
• Signed and dated Financial Disclosure Form(s) 
14.7 Record Retention 
The Investigator will maintain all essential trial documents and source 
documentation that support the data collected on the study subjects in 
compliance with ICH/GCP guidelines. Documents must be retained until at 
least 2 years have elapsed since the date the investigation is completed or 
terminated or the records are no longer required to support a regulatory 
submission, whichever date is later. These documents will be retained for a 
longer period of time by agreement with the Sponsor or in compliance with 
other regulatory requirements. The Investigator will take measures to ensure 
that these essential documents are not accidentally damaged or destroyed. If 
for any reason the Investigator withdraws responsibility for maintaining these 
essential documents, custody must be transferred to an individual who will 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 27 of 29 
assume responsibility. The Sponsor must receive written notification of this 
custodial change. 
14.8 Criteria for Terminating Study 
The Sponsor reserves the right to terminate the study but intends only to 
exercise this right for valid scientific or administrative reasons or reasons 
related to protection of subjects. Investigators and associated ECs will be 
notified in writing in the event of termination. 
 
Possible reasons for study termination include: 
• The discovery of an unexpected, significant, or unacceptable risk to 
subjects enrolled in the study. 
• A decision on the part of the Sponsor to suspend or discontinue further 
regulatory submissions for the device. 
14.9 Criteria for Suspending/Terminating an Investigational Site 
The Sponsor reserves the right to stop the enrollment of subjects at an 
investigational site at any time after the study initiation visit if no subjects have 
been enrolled or if the center has multiple or severe protocol violations 
without justification or fails to follow remedial actions. 
 
Possible reasons for suspending/terminating a study center include: 
• Failure to obtain written Informed Consent. 
• Failure to report SAE or USADE to the Sponsor within 24 hours of 
knowledge. 
• Failure to complete data forms prior to the scheduled monitoring visits. 
• Loss of (or unaccounted for) study product inventory. 
14.10 Publication Policy 
It is anticipated that the Investigators involved will publish the results of this 
study.   Listing of authors shall follow accepted standards of authorship, such 
as those established by International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 
(ICMJE).  Any manuscripts pertaining to this study shall be reviewed for 
technical and scientific accuracy by the Sponsor prior to submission for 
publication.  The Sponsor shall be responsible for approving the peer-
reviewed journals for submission of the manuscript and for requesting edits 
prior to submission.  
14.11 Sponsor Responsibilities 
The Sponsor, Levita Magnetics, is responsible for selecting qualified 
Investigators and providing them with the information and materials 
necessary to conduct this trial appropriately, ensuring proper monitoring of 
the investigation, that EC review and approval are obtained, and ensuring that 
the Investigators and the reviewing EC are promptly notified of significant new 
information about this investigation. 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 28 of 29 
Specifically, the Sponsor will be responsible for: 
• Securing compliance with the clinical protocol, Investigators’ agreement, 
and local regulations; 
• Conducting evaluations of all adverse events; 
• Maintaining records and reports; 
• Analyzing and reporting data; 
• Designating appropriately qualified medical personnel to be available to 
advise on study related medical questions or problems 
 
This study may be used to support regulatory submissions to the United 
States Food and Drug Administration or to regulatory agencies in other 
countries.  If so used, it is the responsibility of the Sponsor to complete such 
applications. 
14.12 Investigator Responsibilities 
Selected Investigators are responsible for items as detailed below:   
• Agree to sign and adhere to the Investigator Agreement. 
• Obtain approval from the EC including subsequent protocol amendments 
and changes to the Informed Consent form and obtaining annual EC 
approval and renewal throughout the duration of the study. 
• Await EC approval, as well as, any additional hospital requirements prior 
to requesting written informed consent from any potential study subject or 
prior to allowing any subject to participate in the study. 
• Complete and provide signed Financial Disclosure information prior to the 
study and maintain this information for the duration of the study. 
• Agree to participate in Investigator meetings, if scheduled, by The 
Sponsor. 
• Be willing to perform and be capable of performing treatment procedures 
as outlined in this protocol. 
• Comply with all required elements of this protocol (e.g., perform testing 
and follow-up as specified, especially during personnel transitions). 
• Agree to obtain written Informed Consent before any study specific 
procedures are performed. 
• Control any study device(s) stored at their site. 
• Be aware of, and comply with, GCP and applicable regulatory 
requirements. 
• Permit monitoring and auditing by the Sponsor, and inspection by the 
appropriate regulatory authorities. 
• Have available an adequate number of qualified staff and adequate 
facilities to properly conduct the study. 
• Ensure study personnel are adequately informed about the protocol, the 
study device and study-related duties and functions. 
 

 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CP006 Rev A Colorectal Protocol 21May19.docx 
 
Page 29 of 29 
15 
REFERENCES 
 
Diaz J, Vidal A, Sandoval C, Recabal P, Altamirano J, Gettman M. First clinical 
evaluation of a novel magnetic retraction device during reduced port robotic 
assisted radical prostatectomy.  Presentation, American Urology Association 
Annual Meeting May 2019. 
 
Guerron A, Portenier D, et al. Magnetic Liver Retraction: an Incision-Less 
Approach for Less Invasive Bariatric Surgery. Obesity Surgery. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03655-w. 
 
Haskins IN, Strong AT, Allemang MT, Bencsath KP, Rodriquez JH, Kroh MD. 
Magnetic surgery: first U.S. experience with a novel device. Surg Endosc.  
2018;32(2):895-899. DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5762-z 
 
Rivas H, Robles I, Riquelme F, et al. Magnetic Surgery. Ann Surg. 
2018;267(1):88-93. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002045. 
 
16 
REVISION HISTORY 
Revision 
Date 
Description of Change 
A 
 21 May 2019 
  Initial release