Intraoperative Video Laryngoscopy as Adjunct for Nerve Monitoring
Phase: NA
Conditions: Vocal Cord Function in Neck Procedures
Sponsor: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Intraoperative Video Laryngoscopy as Adjunct for Nerve Monitoring
Dr. Randall Owen
NCT03742141
Document Date: 1-18-2022

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve 
monitoring
Protocol Number*: GCO #17-2617
National Clinical Trial (NCT) Identified Number:  N/A
Principal Investigator*: Dr. Randall Owen
Sponsor: Neurovision Medical Products, Inc.
Grant Title: N/A
Grant Number*: N/A
Funded by: Neurovision Medical Inc.
Version Number:  2
12/22/2021
All versions should have a version number and a date. Use an international date format (e.g.,YYYY-MM-
DD [2017-12-21] or write  out the month (e.g., 21 December 2017). 
For the initial submission of a protocol to the IRB, indicate “Not applicable; this is the first version of the 
protocol.” in the table below.  For any subsequent amendment being submitted to the IRB, add details of 
the specific changes that are being implemented in the amendment. Please note that Section 10.4 is a 
high-level summary of all formal protocol versions/amendments.
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Involving Humans
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This document is confidential communication. Acceptance of this document constitutes agreement by the 
recipient that no unpublished information contained herein will be published or disclosed without prior 
approval of the Principal Investigator or other participating study leadership and as consistent with the 
NIH terms of award. 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Involving Humans
Table of Contents
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE.......................................................................................................................................1
1
PROTOCOL SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................3
1.1
Synopsis..................................................................................................................................................3
1.2
Schema...................................................................................................................................................3
1.3
Schedule of Activities .............................................................................................................................6
2
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................7
2.1
Study Rationale ......................................................................................................................................7
2.2
Background ............................................................................................................................................7
2.3
Risk/Benefit Assessment........................................................................................................................7
2.3.1
Known Potential Risks ........................................................................................................7
2.3.2
Known Potential Benefits ...................................................................................................8
2.3.3
Assessment of Potential Risks and Benefits .......................................................................8
3
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS ...........................................................................................................................9
4
STUDY DESIGN ................................................................................................................................................12
4.1
Overall Design ......................................................................................................................................12
4.2
Scientific Rationale for Study Design....................................................................................................13
4.3
Justification for Intervention................................................................................................................13
4.4
End-of-Study Definition........................................................................................................................13
5
STUDY POPULATION .......................................................................................................................................13
5.1
Inclusion Criteria ..................................................................................................................................14
5.2
Exclusion Criteria..................................................................................................................................15
5.3
Lifestyle Considerations .......................................................................................................................16
5.4
Screen Failures .....................................................................................................................................16
5.5
Strategies for Recruitment and Retention ...........................................................................................17
6
STUDY INTERVENTION(S) OR EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION(S)..................................................................18
6.1
Study Intervention(s) or Experimental Manipulation(s) Administration..............................................19
6.1.1
Study Intervention or Experimental Manipulation Description .......................................19
6.1.2
Administration and/or Dosing ..........................................................................................19
6.2
Fidelity..................................................................................................................................................19
6.2.1
Interventionist Training and Tracking...............................................................................19
6.3
Measures to Minimize Bias: Randomization and Blinding ...................................................................20
6.4
Study Intervention/Experimental Manipulation Adherence................................................................21
6.5
Concomitant Therapy...........................................................................................................................21
6.5.1
Rescue Therapy ................................................................................................................22
7
STUDY INTERVENTION/EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION DISCONTINUATION AND PARTICIPANT 
DISCONTINUATION/WITHDRAWAL.............................................................................................................................22
7.1
Discontinuation of Study Intervention/Experimental Manipulation....................................................23
7.2
Participant Discontinuation/Withdrawal from the Study ....................................................................23
7.3
Lost to Follow-Up .................................................................................................................................24
8
STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES.......................................................................................................25
8.1
Endpoint and Other Non-Safety Assessments .....................................................................................25
8.2
Safety Assessments..............................................................................................................................27
8.3
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events........................................................................................28
8.3.1
Definition of Adverse Events ............................................................................................28
8.3.2
Definition of Serious Adverse Events................................................................................29
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Involving Humans
8.3.3
Classification of an Adverse Event....................................................................................29
8.3.4
Time Period and Frequency for Event Assessment and Follow-Up..................................31
8.3.5
Adverse Event Reporting ..................................................................................................33
8.3.6
Serious Adverse Event Reporting .....................................................................................33
8.3.7
Reporting Events to Participants ......................................................................................34
8.3.8
Events of Special Interest .................................................................................................34
8.3.9
Reporting of Pregnancy ....................................................................................................34
8.4
Unanticipated Problems.......................................................................................................................35
8.4.1
Definition of Unanticipated Problems..............................................................................35
8.4.2
Unanticipated Problems Reporting ..................................................................................36
8.4.3
Reporting Unanticipated Problems to Participants..........................................................37
9
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................................................37
9.1
Statistical Hypotheses ..........................................................................................................................37
9.2
Sample Size Determination..................................................................................................................38
9.3
Populations for Analyses......................................................................................................................39
9.4
Statistical Analyses...............................................................................................................................39
9.4.1
General Approach.............................................................................................................40
9.4.2
Analysis of the Primary Endpoint(s)..................................................................................40
9.4.3
Analysis of the Secondary Endpoint(s) .............................................................................41
9.4.4
Safety Analyses.................................................................................................................42
9.4.5
Baseline Descriptive Statistics ..........................................................................................42
9.4.6
Planned Interim Analyses .................................................................................................42
9.4.7
Sub-Group Analyses..........................................................................................................43
9.4.8
Tabulation of Individual Participant Data.........................................................................43
9.4.9
Exploratory Analyses ........................................................................................................44
10
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................44
10.1
Regulatory, Ethical, and Study Oversight Considerations ....................................................................44
10.1.1
Informed Consent Process................................................................................................44
10.1.2
Study Discontinuation and Closure...................................................................................45
10.1.3
Confidentiality and Privacy...............................................................................................46
10.1.4
Future Use of Stored Specimens and Data.......................................................................48
10.1.5
Key Roles and Study Governance .....................................................................................49
10.1.6
Safety Oversight................................................................................................................50
10.1.7
Clinical Monitoring ...........................................................................................................50
10.1.8
Quality Assurance and Quality Control.............................................................................52
10.1.9
Data Handling and Record Keeping ..................................................................................53
10.1.10
Protocol Deviations ..........................................................................................................56
10.1.11
Publication and Data Sharing Policy .................................................................................57
10.1.12
Conflict of Interest Policy..................................................................................................57
10.2
Additional Considerations....................................................................................................................58
10.3
Abbreviations and Special Terms .........................................................................................................58
10.4
Protocol Amendment History ..............................................................................................................60
11
REFERENCES....................................................................................................................................................61
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
1
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
(1) The trial will be carried out in accordance with International Council on Harmonisation Good
Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) and the following:
•
United States (US) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) applicable to clinical studies (45 CFR Part
46, 21 CFR Part 50, 21 CFR Part 56, 21 CFR Part 312, and/or 21 CFR Part 812).
The protocol, informed consent form(s), recruitment materials, and all participant materials will 
be submitted to the IRB for review and approval. Approval of both the protocol and the consent 
form(s) must be obtained before any participant is consented. Any amendment to the protocol 
will require review and approval by the IRB before the changes are implemented to the study. All 
changes to the consent form(s) will be IRB approved; a determination will be made regarding 
whether a new consent needs to be obtained from participants who provided consent, using a 
previously approved consent form.
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
2
1
PROTOCOL SUMMARY
1.1
SYNOPSIS 
Title:
Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Grant Number:
N/A
Study Description:
The purpose of this study is to describe the impact of adding 
intraoperative video laryngoscopy (IOVL) to intra-operative laryngeal 
nerve monitoring (IOLNM) during neck procedures when IOLNM is 
routinely used, including thyroidectomy and re-operative 
parathyroidectomy. Specifically, we seek to assess how frequently the 
use of IOVL provided confirmatory or additional information that may 
affect surgeon decision-making when IOLNM alone is ambiguous, or 
when there is equipment malfunction or failure. The IOVL is a 
disposable, otherwise standard fiberoptic laryngoscope (Larynxview, 
Neurovision Medical, Ventura CA) that is inserted alongside the 
endotracheal tube following intubation for surgical procedures. It allows 
assessment of vocal cord movement in response to nerve stimulation. 
Currently, the use of IOLNM is based on audio cues, and visual 
assessment of external laryngeal muscle movement during surgery in 
response to stimulation, but no direct assessment of vocal cord 
movement is routinely possible. This information can be ambiguous and 
subject to judgement of the surgeon. The addition of IOVL provides 
direct assessment to vocal cord movement in response to stimulus, and 
may be useful in light of ambiguous IOLNM data, or limited 
visualization of external laryngeal muscles.
Objectives*:
This is a descriptive study in which we seek to assess the degree to 
which intraoperative video laryngoscopy used in conjunction with 
routine intraoperative nerve monitoring provides additional data on 
nerve integrity and vocal cord function for patients undergoing neck 
procedures that place the recurrent and superior laryngeal nerves at risk 
for injury or postoperative dysfunction. Specifically, we are interested in 
how frequently the information gained from video laryngoscopy may 
provide data on the vocal cord function in situations of ambiguous data 
from the nerve monitor, or in cases of equipment malfunction or failure 
of the nerve monitor. We would also like to assess the frequency of 
discordance in evaluation of intraoperative nerve monitoring, which is 
an indirect measure of vocal cord function via nerve integrity, with 
direct evaluation of vocal cord function via video laryngoscopy
Endpoints*:
This is a descriptive study. There are no specific patient outcome 
endpoints. We will be primarily assessing the frequency with which the 
IOVL provides additional data to IOLNM which may be used to make 
further surgical decision making.
Study Population:
125 patients over the age of 18 with a medical indication for partial or 
total thyroidectomy, re-operative parathyroidectomy, or neck dissection 
will be enrolled at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, 
Mount Sinai Morningside, and Mount Sinai West.
Phase* or Stage:
Enrolling 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
3
Description of 
Sites/Facilities Enrolling 
Participants:
The Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, Mount Sinai 
Morningside, Mount Sinai West
Description of Study 
Intervention/Experimental 
Manipulation:
Intraoperative video laryngoscopy will be used in conjunction with 
routine intraoperative nerve monitoring. We seek to asses the degree to 
which this will provide additional data on nerve integrity and vocal cord 
function for patients undergoing neck procedures that place the recurrent 
and superior laryngeal nerves at risk for injury or postoperative 
dysfunction.
Study Duration*:
We expect the study to take approximately 3 years.
Participant Duration:
3 months
1.2
SCHEMA 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
4
Flow Diagram 
Pre-Screening
Visit 1
Visit 2
Visit 3
Total N: 125
Pre-screen potential participants by inclusion and exclusion criteria
Conduct informed consent process. Perform baseline assessments including routine in-
office fiberoptic laryngoscopy
At 3-month post-operative follow-up: routine fiberoptic laryngoscopy
Video laryngoscopy used during operation; will record vocal cord motion
At 1-week post-operative follow-up: routine fiberoptic laryngoscopy
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
5
1.3
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES 
Pre-screening
(Pre-consent)
Visit 1
Day 1
Visit 2
Day of surgery
Visit  3
 1 week follow-
up
Visit  4
3 month follow-
up
Screen Clinic Schedule and Review 
Eligibility
X
Informed Consent
X
Routine fiberoptic laryngoscopy
X
Video laryngoscope used during 
standard of care operation
X
Routine fiberoptic laryngoscopy
X
Routine fiberoptic laryngoscopy
X
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
6
2
INTRODUCTION
2.1
STUDY RATIONALE 
We seek to assess the degree to which intraoperative video laryngoscopy used in conjunction with routine 
intraoperative nerve monitoring provides additional data on nerve integrity and vocal cord function for 
patients undergoing neck procedures that place the recurrence and superior laryngeal nerves at risk for 
injury or postoperative dysfunction. We want to see how frequently the information gained from video 
laryngoscopy may provide data on the vocal cord function in situations of ambiguous data from the nerve 
monitor, or in cases of equipment malfunction or failure of the nerve monitor. We would also like to 
assess the frequency of discordance in evaluation of intraoperative nerve monitoring, which is an indirect 
measure of vocal cord function via nerve integrity, with direct evaluation of vocal cord function via video 
laryngoscopy.
2.2
BACKGROUND 
Thyroid and re-operative parathyroid surgery are technically demanding surgeries involving highly 
intricate anatomy. The recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is the most important structure at risk during these 
procedures. The gold standard for protecting the nerve is identifying it through careful dissection before 
proceeding with the removal of the thyroid gland. The variability in the nerve's course can lead to trouble 
with identification and increase the risk of injury when surgeons are inexperienced. Although the rate of 
injury to the nerve has been reported to be relatively low—up to 6% for temporary paresis and up to 2% 
for paralysis—the consequences of injury can be devastating and thus lowering the injury rate even more 
is desirable. Data on the use of IOLNM was first published in 2001, and IOLNM has become a widely used 
adjunct for identifying the RLN and allowing real-time identification and functional assessment of the RLN 
in the operative field. It also provides information on the status of the superior laryngeal nerve status and 
function.
IOLNM is an indirect measure of vocal cord function. It provides information on nerve integrity via 
electromyography (EMG). The feedback the surgeon receives from the system is based on the amount of 
current necessary to stimulate vocal cord movement, with higher currents indicating worse signal 
transduction through the nerve, and a loss of signal indicating a severely injured or divided nerve. 
Surgeons are extrapolating vocal cord function based on auditory cues which indicate nerve integrity, as 
well as graphical information of the amplitude of the signal (known as the NPI or nerve power index), but 
do not routinely visualize vocal cord function in real time when making decisions during the procedure.
In our experience, the current system has some limitations. The nerve power index (NPI) is a value 
displayed by the IOLNM system as an expression of nerve function, with higher numbers indicating better 
nerve conduction. The quality of conduction is audibly expressed by a two-tone system, with a higher-
pitched tone occurring with an NPI
>100, and a lower-pitched tone occurring with an NPI <100. Often the actual NPI is very close to 100,
either higher or lower, and interpretation of nerve integrity in this range is ambiguous. Direct
interpretation of vocal cord function could be of greater use to the surgeon at these times. We have also
experienced system failures, either due to a break in the small wires of the electrode leads, or computer
hardware or software malfunction, any of which can lead to the inability to use the IOLNM. In our
experience, some form of failure or malfunction of the IOLNM system occurs in 10-15% of operative cases.
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
7
Visualization of vocal cord function through an independent system offers another means to assess 
recurrent laryngeal nerve integrity in these situations.
Patients who are undergoing bilateral procedures may benefit from the addition of video laryngoscopy. 
At times, the decision to proceed with the second half of a procedure is made based on the perceived 
integrity of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. There are times when the intraoperative nerve monitor 
provided ambiguous data about nerve integrity, or has equipment malfunction or failure and no data are 
available. Video laryngoscopy may give direct information about vocal cord function, and confirmation of 
vocal cord function in the setting of ambiguous data from the nerve monitor may prompt surgeons to 
proceed with surgery, or terminate without performing contralateral procedures, based on demonstrated 
vocal cord function.
This represents a pilot study to first describe the use of IOVL in conjunction with IOLNM during thyroid 
and reoperative parathyroid procedures.
2.3
RISK/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT 
2.3.1
KNOWN POTENTIAL RISKS 
There is minimal foreseeable additional risk to the patient in the addition of video laryngoscopy to the 
routine care for their respective procedures. There is a very small risk of damage to teeth or dental work, 
or trauma to soft tissues of the mount or oropharynx during insertion of the video laryngoscope following 
intubation. There risks are similar but smaller in magnitude to the risks of endotracheal intubation, which 
is already a routine risk of the included procedures.
2.3.2
KNOWN POTENTIAL BENEFITS 
There are no direct benefits to the patients enrolled in this study.
We believe that in evaluating how frequently use of the laryngoscopy provides useful information in 
situations of ambiguous data from the nerve monitor, or in cases of equipment malfunction or failure of 
the nerve monitor, we would be able to assess whether routine use of the laryngoscopy is needed. This 
would perhaps prevent situations in which surgeons have insufficient information from nerve monitoring 
alone.
2.3.3
ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL RISKS AND BENEFITS 
There is minimal foreseeable additional risk to the patient in this study. The future benefits of potentially 
prevent situations in which surgeons have insufficient information from nerve monitoring alone 
outweighs this minimal risk.
3
OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
8
OBJECTIVES
ENDPOINTS
JUSTIFICATION FOR 
ENDPOINTS
Primary
We seek to assess the degree to which 
intraoperative video laryngoscopy used in 
conjunction with routine intraoperative 
nerve monitoring provides additional data on 
nerve integrity and vocal cord functions for 
patients undergoing neck procedures that 
place the recurrent and superior laryngeal 
nerves at risk for injury or postoperative 
dysfunction.
As this is a descriptive study, 
there are no specific patient 
outcome endpoints. We will 
be primarily assessing the 
frequency with which the 
IOVL provides additional data 
to IOLNM which may be used 
to make further surgical 
decisions.
We hope that the 
addition of IOVL will 
aid in surgical 
decision-making and 
nerve monitoring.
4
STUDY DESIGN
4.1
OVERALL DESIGN
This will be a prospective cohort study without randomization. Patients enrolled will undergo the planned 
procedure according to our routines of care. IOLNM will be performed per our routine of care.
Additional procedures will involve the following:
1)
Following consent, but prior to the operation we will complete routine in-office fiberoptic
laryngoscopy to assess baseline vocal cord function
2)
Prior to intubation, the patient will receive glycopyrrolate 0.004 mg/kg, as per typical pre-
anesthetic dosing regimen, to decrease airway and mucous membrane secretions
3)
Upon intubation, the video laryngoscope will be passed under direct vision and secured alongside
the endotracheal tube. Vocal cords will be positioned in the visual field of the laryngoscope before
beginning the operation
4)
Following video laryngoscopy, and initiation of the procedure, the ipsilateral vagus nerve will be
tested using nerve stimulation (per standard protocol) to ensure good distal nerve conduction
and identify potential non-recurrent laryngeal nerve anatomy
5)
At all points during the procedure where intraoperative nerve monitoring is used, information
about vocal cord motion from video laryngoscopy will also be recorded. Specifically, we will record
the neuropraxia index from the nerve monitor, and whether vocal cord function in concordant
with the nueropraxia index
6)
At the conclusion of resection, the recurrent and superior laryngeal nerves will be assessed with
IONM, the vagus will be assessed with IONM, and lastly the vocal cords will be assessed with IOVL.
This sequence is consistent with the describe protocol for IONM for testing the vagus and
recurrent nerve prior to resection, and then again in reverse order following resection
(V1R1R2V2).
7)
After conclusion of the procedure and final surgical closing, prior to extubation, vocal cord
function will again be assessed with video laryngoscopy
8)
At standard 1-week and 3-month post-operative follow-up we will also perform routine fiberoptic
laryngoscopy, per common practice, to assess vocal cord function. Patients will be asked to
complete a brief questionnaire at both of these visits
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
9
Medical records will be used to collect the vast majority of data required for this study. In addition, 
patients will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire at both the standard 1-week and 3-month follow 
up visits.
Research activities will occur at the Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, Mount Sinai 
Morningside, and Mount Sinai West.
4.2
SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE FOR STUDY DESIGN
This study seeks to assess the degree to which IOVL used in conjunction with routine IOLNM provides 
additional data on nerve integrity and vocal cord function for patients undergoing neck procedures that 
place the recurrent and superior laryngeal nerve at risk for injury or postoperative dysfunction.
4.3
JUSTIFICATION FOR INTERVENTION
Currently, the use of IOLNM is based on audio cues, and visual assessment of external laryngeal muscle 
movement during surgery in response to stimulation, but not direct assessment of vocal cord movement 
is routinely possible. This information can be ambiguous and subject to judgement of the surgeon. The 
addition of IOVL provides direct assessment to vocal cord movement in response to stimulus, and may be 
useful in light of ambiguous IOLNM data, or limited visualization of external laryngeal muscles.
4.4
END-OF-STUDY DEFINITION
The end of the study for a participant is define as completion of the 3-month follow-up visit.
5
STUDY POPULATION
5.1
INCLUSION CRITERIA
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:
1.
Age 18 and older with capacity to make all medical decisions
2.
Medical indication for partial or total thyroidectomy, re-operative parathyroidectomy, or neck
dissection
5.2
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
1.
Patients who are under the age of 18, or who are not able to make medical decisions or consent
to research
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
10
5.3
LIFESTYLE CONSIDERATIONS
N/A
5.4
SCREEN FAILURES
Screen failures are defined as participants who consent to participate in this study but are not 
subsequently assigned to the study intervention or entered in the study. Individuals who do not meet the 
criteria for participation in this trial (screen failure) because of meeting one or more exclusion criteria that 
are likely to change over time may be rescreened. Rescreened participants will be assigned the same 
participant number as for the initial screening.
5.5
STRATEGIES FOR RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION
We typically see and operate on 20-25 patients per month in our endocrine surgery practice who undergo 
thyroid or re-operative parathyroid surgery in whom IOLNM is routine. Over a one-year period this would 
give us access to 200-250 patients who would meet inclusion criteria. Assuming approximately 25-50% of 
patients consent to participate, this should comfortably allow us to recruit 75-125 patients over the 
proposed study period. Based on our experience suggesting a 10-15% incidence of IOLNM system 
malfunction or failure, this should allow us 8-15 patients with IOLNM malfunction with which to directly 
compare and describe the information available to the surgeon from routine IOLNM and from the IOVL. 
The degree to which this information differs will allow us to determine if we think IOVL may provide 
information that could change outcomes and if further, larger studies are warranted. 
Patients will be approached to consent in any one of the clinic spaces used by the investigators on this 
study. All of these locations are listed above. All surgical procedures will be performed in the operating 
rooms at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Morningside, Mount Sinai West, and Mount Sinai Beth Israel. 
Follow up visits will be at the previously described clinic locations.
6
STUDY INTERVENTION(S) OR EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION(S)
6.1
STUDY INTERVENTION(S) OR EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION(S) ADMINISTRATION
6.1.1
STUDY INTERVENTION OR EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION DESCRIPTION
Intraoperative video laryngoscopy will be used in conjunction with routine intraoperative nerve 
monitoring. We seek to asses the degree to which this will provide additional data on nerve integrity and 
vocal cord function for patients undergoing neck procedures that place the recurrent and superior 
laryngeal nerves at risk for injury or postoperative dysfunction.
6.1.2
ADMINISTRATION AND/OR DOSING
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
11
At the patient’s standard of care surgery, prior to intubation, the patient will receive glycopyrrolate 0.004 
mg/kg, as per typical pre-anesthetic dosing regimen. Upon intubation, the video laryngoscope will be 
passed under direct vision and secured alongside the endotracheal tube. Vocal cords will be positioned in 
the visual field of the laryngoscope before beginning the operation. Following video laryngoscopy, and 
initiation of the procedure, the ipsilateral vagus nerve will be testing used nerve stimulation (per standard 
protocol) to ensure good distal nerve conduction and identify potential non-recurrent laryngeal nerve 
anatomy.  At all points during the procedure where intraoperative nerve monitoring is used, information 
about vocal cord motion from video laryngoscopy will also be recorded. Specifically, we will record the 
neuropraxia index from the nerve monitor, and whether vocal cord function in concordant with the 
nueropraxia index. At the conclusion of resection, the recurrent and superior laryngeal nerves will be 
assessed with IONM, the vagus will be assessed with IONM, and lastly the vocal cords will be assessed 
with IOVL. This sequence is consistent with the describe protocol for IONM for testing the vagus and 
recurrent nerve prior to resection, and then again in reverse order following resection (V1R1R2V2). After 
conclusion of the procedure and final surgical closing, prior to extubation, vocal cord function will again 
be assessed with video laryngoscopy.
6.2
FIDELITY
6.2.1
INTERVENTIONIST TRAINING AND TRACKING
N/A
6.3
MEASURES TO MINIMIZE BIAS: RANDOMIZATION AND BLINDING
N/A
6.4
STUDY INTERVENTION/EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION ADHERENCE
N/A
6.5
CONCOMITANT THERAPY
N/A
6.5.1
RESCUE THERAPY
N/A
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
12
7
STUDY INTERVENTION/EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION DISCONTINUATION AND 
PARTICIPANT DISCONTINUATION/WITHDRAWAL
7.1
DISCONTINUATION OF STUDY INTERVENTION/EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION
N/A
7.2
PARTICIPANT DISCONTINUATION/WITHDRAWAL FROM THE STUDY
Participation in this study is completely voluntary. Subjects are free to withdraw their participation at any 
time. Subjects who wish to withdraw from the study must contact the Principal Investigator or the 
research staff. Requests to withdraw from the study must be done in writing to the Principal Investigator 
at the address provided on the consent form.
The Principal Investigator or the institution may end a subject’s involvement in the research study at any 
time without consent from the subject. This may be because the research study is being stopped, the 
instructions of the study team have not been followed by the subject, the investigator believes it is in the 
subject’s best interest, or for any other reason.
7.3
LOST TO FOLLOW-UP
N/A
8
STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES
8.1
ENDPOINT AND OTHER NON-SAFETY ASSESSMENTS
Data will be stored in the secure REDCap database. The study investigators will have access to the study 
data, which will be stored on a Mount Sinai secured, shared network drive. All paper documents relating 
to the study will be stored in the Research Office. The data will be stored with a code that can be linked 
to the identity of the participant.
Duration the data will be stored: The Principal Investigator will keep the data on a mass storage device, 
Mount Sinai’s server, for a minimum period of six years after publication.
All study data collected will be entered into the electronic REDCap database. The data will be stored on a 
Mount Sinai network drive, accessible only to the PI and members of the research team. The data will be 
password protected.
Data is always de-identified prior to data analysis. In all disclosures outside of Mount Sinai, subjects are 
not identified by name, social security number, address, telephone number, or any other direct personal 
identifier unless disclosure of the direct identifier is required by law.
All data analysis will be done on de-identified data only and on a secure Mount Sinai Network computer.
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
13
All discussions with patients will be conducted in a private area away from distractions, in order to 
maintain patient privacy. The patient will have control of/be responsible for scheduling their 
appointments at a time that is convenient for them. In order to make the subject feel “at ease,” study 
personnel will be accessible, available, and receptive to questions and concerns raised by the patient 
about study-related procedures.
If subjects are injured or made sick from taking part in this research study, medical care will be provided. 
Generally, this medical care will be billed to the subject and/or their health care insurance. In the event 
of injury, subjects should contact the Principal Investigator, Randall Owen.
8.2
SAFETY ASSESSMENTS
At standard 1-week and 3-month post-operative follow-up we will perform routine fiberoptic 
laryngoscopy, per common practice, to assess vocal cord function.
8.3
ADVERSE EVENTS AND SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS
8.3.1
DEFINITION OF ADVERSE EVENTS
This protocol uses the definition of adverse event from 21 CFR 312.32 (a): any untoward medical 
occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in humans, whether or not considered intervention-
related.
8.3.2
DEFINITION OF SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS
N/A
8.3.3
CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADVERSE EVENT
8.3.3.1
SEVERITY OF EVENT
For adverse events (AEs) not included in the protocol defined grading system, the following guidelines will 
be used to describe severity. 
•
Mild – Events require minimal or no treatment and do not interfere with the participant’s daily
activities.
•
Moderate – Events result in a low level of inconvenience or concern with the therapeutic
measures. Moderate events may cause some interference with functioning.
•
Severe – Events interrupt a participant’s usual daily activity and may require systemic drug
therapy or other treatment. Severe events are usually potentially life-threatening or
incapacitating.  Of note, the term “severe” does not necessarily equate to “serious”.
8.3.3.2
RELATIONSHIP TO STUDY INTERVENTION/EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
14
All adverse events (AEs) will have their relationship to study procedures, including the intervention, 
assessed by an appropriately-trained clinician based on temporal relationship and his/her clinical 
judgment. The degree of certainty about causality will be graded using the categories below. 
•
Related – The AE is known to occur with the study procedures, there is a reasonable possibility
that the study procedures caused the AE, or there is a temporal relationship between the study
procedures and the event. Reasonable possibility means that there is evidence to suggest a causal
relationship between the study procedures and the AE.
•
Not Related – There is not a reasonable possibility that the study procedures caused the event,
there is no temporal relationship between the study procedures and event onset, or an alternate
etiology has been established.
8.3.3.3
EXPECTEDNESS 
A clinician with appropriate expertise in hyperparathyroidism will be responsible for determining whether 
an adverse event (AE) is expected or unexpected. An AE will be considered unexpected if the nature, 
severity, or frequency of the event is not consistent with the risk information previously described for the 
study procedures.
8.3.4
TIME PERIOD AND FREQUENCY FOR EVENT ASSESSMENT AND FOLLOW-UP
The occurrence of an adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) may come to the attention of 
study personnel during study visits and interviews of a study participant presenting for medical care, or 
upon review by a study monitor.
All AEs, not otherwise precluded per the protocol, will be captured on the appropriate case report form 
(CRF). Information to be collected includes event description, time of onset, clinician’s assessment of 
severity, relationship to study procedures (assessed only by those with the training and authority to make 
a diagnosis), and time of resolution/stabilization of the event. All AEs occurring while on study will be 
documented appropriately regardless of relationship. All AEs will be followed to adequate resolution.
Any medical or psychiatric condition that is present at the time that the participant is screened will be 
considered as baseline and not reported as an AE. However, if the study participant’s condition 
deteriorates at any time during the study, it will be recorded as an AE. 
Changes in the severity of an AE will be documented to allow an assessment of the duration of the event 
at each level of severity to be performed. Documentation of onset and duration of each episode will be 
maintained for AEs characterized as intermittent.
The study coordinator will record events with start dates occurring any time after informed consent is 
obtained until 7 (for non-serious AEs) or 30 days (for SAEs) after the last day of study participation.  At 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
15
each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit.  Events 
will be followed for outcome information until resolution or stabilization.
8.3.5
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING 
The Principal Investigator or a study team member will report adverse events to the sponsor and IRB in a 
timely manner.
8.3.6
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING 
In consultation with the PI, a trained member of the study team will be responsible for conducting an 
evaluation of a serious adverse event and shall report the results of such evaluation to the sponsor and 
the reviewing Institutional Review Board (IRB) as soon as possible, but in no event later than 10 working 
days after the investigator first learns of the event.
8.3.7
REPORTING EVENTS TO PARTICIPANTS 
N/A
8.3.8
EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST 
N/A
8.3.9
REPORTING OF PREGNANCY 
N/A
8.4
UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS
8.4.1
DEFINITION OF UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS
This protocol uses the definition of Unanticipated Problems as defined by the Office for Human Research 
Protections (OHRP).  OHRP considers unanticipated problems involving risks to participants or others to 
include, in general, any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the following criteria:
•
Unexpected in terms of nature, severity, or frequency given (a) the research procedures that are
described in the protocol-related documents, such as the Institutional Review Board (IRB)-
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
16
approved research protocol and informed consent document; and (b) the characteristics of the 
participant population being studied;
•
Related or possibly related to participation in the research (“possibly related” means there is a
reasonable possibility that the incident, experience, or outcome may have been caused by the
procedures involved in the research); and
•
Suggests that the research places participants or others at a greater risk of harm (including
physical, psychological, economic, or social harm) than was previously known or recognized.
8.4.2
 UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS REPORTING 
The investigator will report unanticipated problems (UPs) to the reviewing Institutional Review Board 
(IRB) and to the Data Coordinating Center (DCC)/lead principal investigator (PI). The UP report will include 
the following information:
•
Protocol identifying information: protocol title and number, PI’s name, and the IRB project
number
•
A detailed description of the event, incident, experience, or outcome
•
An explanation of the basis for determining that the event, incident, experience, or outcome
represents an UP
•
A description of any changes to the protocol or other corrective actions that have been taken or
are proposed in response to the UP
8.4.3
REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS TO PARTICIPANTS 
N/A
9
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
9.1
STATISTICAL HYPOTHESES
N/A
9.2
SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION
N/A
9.3
POPULATIONS FOR ANALYSES
N/A
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
17
9.4
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
9.4.1
GENERAL APPROACH
All statistical analysis will be done on deidentified data only, using SPSS on a secure Mount Sinai Network 
computer.
9.4.2
ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY ENDPOINT(S)
N/A
9.4.3
ANALYSIS OF THE SECONDARY ENDPOINT(S)
N/A
9.4.4
SAFETY ANALYSES
N/A
9.4.5
BASELINE DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
N/A
9.4.6
PLANNED INTERIM ANALYSES 
N/A
9.4.7
SUB-GROUP ANALYSES
N/A
9.4.8
TABULATION OF INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT DATA
N/A
9.4.9
EXPLORATORY ANALYSES
N/A
10
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
18
10.1 REGULATORY, ETHICAL, AND STUDY OVERSIGHT CONSIDERATIONS
10.1.1 INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS
10.1.1.1 CONSENT/ASSENT 
AND 
OTHER 
INFORMATIONAL 
DOCUMENTS 
PROVIDED 
TO 
PARTICIPANTS
Consent forms describing in detail the study intervention, study procedures, and risks will be given to the 
participant and written documentation of informed consent will be completed prior to starting the study 
intervention.  The following consent materials are submitted with this protocol: Informed Consent Form.
We do anticipate enrolling non-English speaking patients. Once this consent form is IRB approved, we will 
have it translated into Spanish and Russian and submit a modification to have these consent documents 
approved. We will also potentially enroll patients who speak other languages. However, since we do not 
expect to enroll a significant number of patients who speak any other language, we will be using the short 
form consent process to consent those patients. We will approach the IRB on a case-by-case basis to 
request a short form consent.
10.1.1.2 CONSENT PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION
A member of the study team identifies potential study subjects from the review of the clinic and/or 
operating room schedules of study physicians. A HIPAA waiver is being requested for access to this 
information during this pre-screening process. Potential subjects are first approached by their treating 
physician during a routine office visit, to asses interest in the study. If the patient expresses interest, a 
member of the study team will approach them for an informed consent process following Mount Sinai 
SOP. If patients prefer to spend extra time going over the consent form, they can also consent for 
participation immediately before the surgical procedure. However in this case, even if the patient has 
already been informed of the study they will still go through the entire document with a member of the 
research team before signing. Patients are considered to be enrolled in the study after signing the ICF.
10.1.2 STUDY DISCONTINUATION AND CLOSURE
This study may be temporarily suspended or prematurely terminated if there is sufficient reasonable 
cause. Written notification, documenting the reason for study suspension or termination, will be provided 
by the suspending or terminating party to study participants, investigator, and regulatory authorities. If 
the study is prematurely terminated or suspended, the Principal Investigator (PI) will promptly inform 
study participants, and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and will provide the reason(s) for the 
termination or suspension. Study participants will be contacted, as applicable.
10.1.3 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
19
Participant confidentiality and privacy is strictly held in trust by the participating investigators, their staff, 
and the safety and oversight monitor(s). This confidentiality is extended to the data being collected as 
part of this study. Data that could be used to identify a specific study participant will be held in strict 
confidence within the research team. No personally-identifiable information from the study will be 
released to any unauthorized third party without prior written approval of the sponsor/funding agency. 
All research activities will be conducted in as private a setting as possible.
The representatives of the Institutional Review Board (IRB), or regulatory agencies may inspect all 
documents and records required to be maintained by the investigator, including but not limited to, 
medical records (office, clinic, or hospital) and pharmacy records for the participants in this study. The 
clinical study site will permit access to such records.
The study participant’s contact information will be securely stored at each clinical site for internal use 
during the study. At the end of the study, all records will continue to be kept in a secure location for as 
long a period as dictated by the reviewing IRB, Institutional policies, or sponsor/funding agency 
requirements.
Study participant research data, which is for purposes of statistical analysis and scientific reporting, will 
be transmitted to and stored on a Mount Sinai secured, shared network drive. This will not include the 
participant’s contact or identifying information. Rather, individual participants and their research data will 
be identified by a unique study identification number. The study data entry and study management 
systems used by clinical sites and by the research staff will be secured and password protected. At the 
end of the study, all study databases will be de-identified and archived on a Mount Sinai secured network 
drive.
Data will be stored in the secure REDCap database. Only the study investigators will have access to the 
study data, which will be stored on a Mount Sinai secured, shared network drive. The data will be 
password protected. All paper document relating to the study will be stored in the Research Office. Data 
is always de-identified prior to data analysis. In all disclosures outside of Mount Sinai, subjects are not 
identified by name, social security number, address, telephone number, or any other direct personal 
identifier unless disclosure of the direct identifier is required by law.
PHI will be protected in the HIPAA-compliant, secure REDCap Database.  This will be accessed by 
password-protected, encrypted computers.
10.1.4 FUTURE USE OF STORED SPECIMENS AND DATA 
All patient identifiers will be destroyed as soon as data collection and analysis are complete. All analysis 
will be conducted on de-identified data. The Principal Investigator will keep the data on a mass storage 
device, Mount Sinai’s server, for a minimum of six years after publication.
10.1.5 KEY ROLES AND STUDY GOVERNANCE
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
20
Principal Investigator
Medical Monitor or 
Independent Safety Monitor
Randall Owen, MD
N/A
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount 
Sinai
 Box 
1103, New York, NY 10029
212-241-2891
Randall.owen@mountsinai.org
Mount Sinai’s Institutional Review Board is responsible for study oversight. Study misconduct will be 
reported to the IRB.
10.1.6 SAFETY OVERSIGHT
Safety oversight will be under the direction of a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) composed of 
individuals with the appropriate expertise. Members of the DSMB will be independent from the study 
conduct and free of conflict of interest. The DSMB will meet at least semiannually to assess safety and 
efficacy data from each arm of the study. The DSMB will operate under the rules of an approved charter 
that will be written and reviewed at the organizational meeting of the DSMB. At this time, each data 
element that the DSMB needs to assess will be clearly defined. The DSMB will provide its input to the 
research team.
10.1.7 CLINICAL MONITORING
N/A
10.1.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
Each clinical site will perform internal quality management of study conduct, data collection, 
documentation and completion. All sites will follow a common quality management plan.
Quality control (QC) procedures will be implemented as follows:
Informed consent --- Study staff will review both the documentation of the consenting process as well as 
a percentage of the completed consent documents. This review will evaluate compliance with GCP, 
accuracy, and completeness.  Feedback will be provided to the study team to ensure proper consenting 
procedures are followed. 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
21
Source documents and the electronic data --- Data will be initially captured on source documents (see 
Section 10.1.9, Data Handling and Record Keeping) and will ultimately be entered into the study 
database.  To ensure accuracy site staff will compare a representative sample of source data against the 
database, targeting key data points in that review.
Protocol Deviations – The study team will review protocol deviations on an ongoing basis and will 
implement corrective actions when the quantity or nature of deviations are deemed to be at a level of 
concern.
Should independent monitoring become necessary, the PI will provide direct access to all trial related 
sites, source data/documents, and reports for the purpose of monitoring and auditing by the 
sponsor/funding agency, and inspection by local and regulatory authorities.
10.1.9 DATA HANDLING AND RECORD KEEPING 
10.1.9.1 DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES 
Data collection will be the responsibility of the clinical trial staff at the site under the supervision of the 
site investigator. The investigator will be responsible for ensuring the accuracy, completeness, legibility, 
and timeliness of the data reported.
All source documents will be completed in a neat, legible manner to ensure accurate interpretation of 
data.  
Hardcopies of the study visit worksheets will be provided for use as source document worksheets for 
recording data for each participant consented/enrolled in the study.  Data recorded in the electronic case 
report form (eCRF) derived from source documents will be consistent with the data recorded on the 
source documents. 
Clinical data (including adverse events (AEs), concomitant medications, and expected adverse reactions 
data) and clinical laboratory data will be entered into REDCap. The data system includes password 
protection.
10.1.9.2 STUDY RECORDS RETENTION 
The Principal Investigator will keep the data on a mass storage device, Mount Sinai's server, for a minimum 
period of six years after publication.
10.1.10
PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS  
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
22
This protocol defines a protocol deviation as any noncompliance with the clinical trial protocol. The 
noncompliance may be either on the part of the participant, the investigator, or the study site staff. As a 
result of deviations, corrective actions will be developed by the site and implemented promptly. 
It will be the responsibility of the site investigator to use continuous vigilance to identify and report 
deviations. All deviations will be addressed in study source documents and will be sent to the reviewing 
Institutional Review Board (IRB) per their policies. The site investigator will be responsible for knowing 
and adhering to the reviewing IRB requirements. 
10.1.11
PUBLICATION AND DATA SHARING POLICY 
All published data will be de-identified.
10.1.12
CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY
The independence of this study from any actual or perceived influence, such as by the pharmaceutical 
industry, is critical. Therefore, any actual conflict of interest of persons who have a role in the design, 
conduct, analysis, publication, or any aspect of this trial will be disclosed and managed. Furthermore, 
persons who have a perceived conflict of interest will be required to have such conflicts managed in a way 
that is appropriate to their participation in the design and conduct of this trial. The study leadership in 
conjunction with the IRB has established policies and procedures for all study group members to disclose 
all conflicts of interest and will establish a mechanism for the management of all reported dualities of 
interest.
10.2 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
N/A
10.3 ABBREVIATIONS AND SPECIAL TERMS
AE
Adverse Event
ANCOVA
Analysis of Covariance
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
CLIA
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments
CMP
Clinical Monitoring Plan
COC
Certificate of Confidentiality
CONSORT
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
CRF
Case Report Form
DCC
Data Coordinating Center
DHHS
Department of Health and Human Services
DSMB
Data Safety Monitoring Board
DRE
Disease-Related Event
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
23
EC
Ethics Committee
eCRF
Electronic Case Report Forms
FDA
Food and Drug Administration
FDAAA
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
FFR
Federal Financial Report
GCP
Good Clinical Practice
GLP
Good Laboratory Practices
GMP
Good Manufacturing Practices
GWAS
Genome-Wide Association Studies
HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
IB
Investigator’s Brochure
ICH
International Council on Harmonisation 
ICMJE
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
IDE
Investigational Device Exemption
IND
Investigational New Drug Application
IRB
Institutional Review Board
ISM
Independent Safety Monitor
ITT
Intention-To-Treat
LSMEANS
Least-squares Means
MedDRA
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
MOP
Manual of Procedures
NCT
National Clinical Trial
NIH 
National Institutes of Health
NIH IC
NIH Institute or Center
OHRP
Office for Human Research Protections
PI
Principal Investigator
QA
Quality Assurance
QC
Quality Control
SAE
Serious Adverse Event
SAP
Statistical Analysis Plan
SMC
Safety Monitoring Committee
SOA
Schedule of Activities
SOC
System Organ Class
SOP
Standard Operating Procedure
UP
Unanticipated Problem
US
United States
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
24
10.4 PROTOCOL AMENDMENT HISTORY
The table below is intended to capture changes of IRB-approved versions of the protocol, including a 
description of the change and rationale. A Summary of Changes table for the current amendment is 
located in the Protocol Title Page. 
Version
Date
Description of Change 
Brief Rationale
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023

Intraoperative video laryngoscopy as adjunct for nerve monitoring
Version 2
GCO #17-2617
12/22/2021
NIH Protocol Template for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
25
11
REFERENCES 
Effective Date: 1/18/2022
End Date:1/17/2023