Clinical Study of the Efficacy of the Ophthalmic Emulsion PRO-145 for the Management of Inflammation and Pain After Phacoemulsification Compared to Prednisolone Acetate 1%.
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Cataract
Sponsor: Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.

 
 
 
Creation date: July 2016 
Clinical study of the efficacy of the 
ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 for the 
management of inflammation and pain 
after phacoemulsification compared to 
prednisolone acetate 1%. 
Protocol code: SOPH145-0716 / III 
Protocol version: 2 
Date of the version: 08/02/2018 
Registration: Pending 
Sponsor: Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. 

PRO-122 
 
Protocolo del estudio clínico: SOPH122 -0316/III 
Versión: 1.0 
 
 
 
 Page left intentionally blank

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 1 of 65 
 
1. Summary 
Title of the study: 
Clinical study of the efficacy of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 for the management of 
inflammation and pain, after phacoemulsification compared to prednisolone acetate 1%. 
Protocol code: SOPH145-0716/III 
Creation date: 12/07/2016 
Protocol version: 2 
Date of the version: 08/02/2018 
Therapeutic indication: Anti-inflammatory. 
Study period: 8 months 
Development phase: III 
Goals: 
To evaluate the efficacy of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 in the treatment of inflammation 
and pain after phacoemulsification. 
Hypothesis: 
The use of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 is effective in decreasing the inflammatory response 
evaluated by means of cellularity in the anterior chamber, after phacoemulsification. 
Methodology: 
Phase III clinical trial, double-blind, controlled, parallel group, multicentre, randomized. 
Number of patients: 
178 subjects divided into 2 groups (89 subjects per group), who will provide an eye for the 
evaluation of efficacy. 
Diagnosis and main inclusion criteria: 
Diagnosis: Postoperative phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens placement in a bag. 
Main criteria: 
 -Informed consent 
 - Age ≥ 18 years 
 -Both genders 
 - Postoperative cataract surgery by phacoemulsification 
o o That they have met the criteria for phacoemulsification and a classification of 
the LOCS III cataract of NO ≥2 and NC ≥2 
Test product, dose and route of administration: 
• PRO-145. Difluprednate 0.05%. Prepared by Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, 
Mexico. 
- Dosage: 1 drop 4 times a day (every 4 hours) during the period of vigil in the operated eye, for 
14 days. Dose reduction for 14 days at the discretion of the principal investigator. 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 2 of 65 
 
- Route of administration: topical ophthalmic 
Treatment duration: 
28 days 
Reference product, dose and route of administration: 
1. Prednefrin® SF. Prednisolone Acetate 1%. Prepared by Allergan, S.A. of C.V. 
- Dosage: 1 drop 4 times a day (every 4 hours) during the period of vigil in the operated eye, for 
14 days. Dose reduction for 14 days at the discretion of the principal investigator.- Route of 
administration: topical ophthalmic 
Evaluation criteria: 
Effectiveness: 
• Primary 
o Cellularity in the anterior chamber 
• Secondary 
o Visual capacity (CV) 
o Central thickness of the retina 
or Clinical corneal edema 
or conjunctival hyperemia 
or Flare 
o Symptomatology 
   - Pain 
   - Photophobia 
Tolerability: 
• Post-Stretching Ocular Symptomatology 
Security: 
• Visual capacity (CV) 
• Adverse events (EA) 
• Intraocular pressure (PIO) 
Statistical methodology: 
The result of the continuous quantitative variables will be presented in measures of central 
tendency: mean, standard deviation and ranges. The total size of the samples will consider an eye 
as a case for the evaluation of efficacy. 
The normal distribution of the results will be obtained through the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and 
Shapiro-Wilks test. The statistical analysis of the continuous quantitative variables to find 
significant differences (p) will be in the inter-group analysis: t test for paired samples; for intra-
group analysis: McNemar test. Evaluations of cellularity in the anterior chamber before the 
application of the intervention and in the final visit will be considered for the analysis. The level 
of difference to consider significance will be an alpha of 0.05 or less. The result of nominal and 
ordinal qualitative variables will be presented in frequencies, proportions and percentages. The 
statistical analysis to identify significant differences of the qualitative variables will be done 
creating 2x2 contingency tables and will be carried out as follows: Difference between groups: χ2 
test (Chi-square) of Pearson or Fisher's exact in expected values less than 5 ; for intra-group 
analysis: McNemar test 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 3 of 65 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Page left intentionally blank

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 5 of 65 
 
2. Content 
1. SUMMARY 
1 
2. CONTENT 
5 
3. ABBREVIATION INDEX 
9 
4. ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY 
11 
5. INTRODUCTION 
13 
5.1 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 
13 
5.2 DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM AND FUNDAMENTAL REASON 
15 
5.3 BACKGROUND 
16 
5.3.1 DIFLUPREDNATE 
16 
5.3.1.1 Eyeball pharmacokinetics 
16 
5.3.1.2 Preclinical studies 
16 
5.3.1.3 Clinical safety studies 
17 
5.3.1.4 Clinical efficacy studies 
18 
5.3.1.5. Safety and tolerability 
19 
5.4 JUSTIFICATION 
20 
5.5 OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS 
20 
5.5.1 GENERAL PURPOSE 
20 
5.5.2 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES 
20 
5.5.3 SECONDARY OBJECTIVES 
20 
5.5.4 HYPOTHESIS 
20 
5.6 DESIGN AND STUDY PLAN 
21 
5.6.1 DISCUSSION OF THE STUDY DESIGN 
22 
6. MATERIAL AND METHODS. PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS AND VARIABLES 
22 
6.1 STUDY CENTER 
22 
6.1.1 ORGANIZATION OF THE CENTER 
22 
6.1.2 DOCUMENTATION TO BE DELIVERED TO THE SPONSOR 
23 
6.1.3 CLOSURE OF THE CENTER 
23 
6.2 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 
23 
6.2.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA 
23 
6.2.2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA 
23 
6.2.2.1 General criteria 
23 
6.2.2.2 Medical and therapeutic criteria 
24 
6.2.3 ELIMINATION CRITERIA 
24 
6.2.4 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT 
25 
6.3 INTERVENTION 
25 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 6 of 65 
 
6.3.1 ADMINISTERED TREATMENTS 
25 
6.3.1.1 Treatment in study 
26 
6.3.1.2 Reference treatment 
26 
6.3.2 STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE ADHERENCE AND PROCEDURE TO MONITOR ADHERENCE 
27 
6.3.3 TREATMENTS AND CONVENTIONAL INTERVENTIONS PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED BEFORE AND 
DURING THE STUDY 
29 
6.3.4 MANAGEMENT OF TREATMENT 
29 
6.3.4.1 Delivery and reception 
29 
6.3.4.2 Storage 
30 
6.3.4.3 Return 
30 
6.4 UNLOCK VARIABLES 
30 
6.4.1 SECURITY VARIABLES 
30 
6.4.1.1 Primary outcome variables 
30 
6.4.1.2 Tolerability variables 
30 
6.4.2 EFFICACY VARIABLES 
30 
6.4.2.1 Primary outcome variables 
30 
6.4.2.2 Secondary outcome variables 
30 
6.4.3 METHODS AND SCALES TO BE USED FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES 
31 
6.4.3.1 Biomicroscopy 
31 
6.4.3.2 Visual ability 
33 
6.4.3.3 Evaluation of adverse events 
33 
6.4.3.4 History of symptomatology 
34 
6.4.3.5 Optical coherence tomography 
34 
6.4.3.6 Tonometry 
34 
6.4.4 TIME OF MEASUREMENTS 
34 
6.5 CHRONOGRAM AND STUDY DIAGRAM 
35 
6.5.1 SCHEDULE 
36 
6.5.2 PROCEDURES TO BE PERFORMED BY VISIT 
37 
6.5.2.1 Basal visit 
37 
6.5.2.2 Visit 1 
38 
6.5.2.3 Visit 2 
38 
6.5.2.4 Final Visit 
39 
6.5.2.5 Security call: 
39 
6.5.3 STUDY DIAGRAM 
39 
6.6 SAMPLE SIZE 
40 
6.6.1 CALCULATION OF SAMPLE SIZE 
40 
6.7 RECRUITMENT 
40 
7. METHODS ASSIGNMENT OF THE INTERVENTION 
40 
7.1 GENERATION OF THE ASSIGNMENT SEQUENCE 
40 
7.2 BLINDING MECHANISM 
40 
7.3 IMPLEMENTATION 
40 
7.4 BLINDING AND MASKING 
41 
7.4.1 BLIND OPENING 
41 
8. METHODS DATA COLLECTION, ADMINISTRATION AND ANALYSIS 
41 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 7 of 65 
 
8.1 METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION 
41 
8.1.1 STRATEGIES TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOW-UP 
41 
8.2 ADMINISTRATION OF DATA 
42 
8.3 STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY 
42 
8.3.1 ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DISSOLVEMENT VARIABLES 
42 
8.3.2 ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS 
43 
8.3.3 ANALYSIS OF POPULATION AND HANDLING OF MISSING DATA 
43 
9. METHODS MONITORING 
43 
9.1 DATA MONITORING 
43 
9.2 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND EARLY TERMINATION OF THE STUDY 
45 
9.3 ADVERSE EVENTS 
45 
9.3.1 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE INVESTIGATOR 
45 
9.3.1.1 Record of adverse events in the Case Report Form 
46 
9.3.1.2 Follow up of adverse events 
47 
9.3.1.3 Procedures for a serious adverse event 
47 
9.3.1.4 Causality evaluation 
48 
9.3.2 SPONSOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES 
50 
9.4 AUDIT 
50 
9.4.1 PRE-STUDIO AUDIT 
50 
9.4.2 AUDIT / INSPECTION DURING STUDY DRIVING 
50 
10. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
50 
10.1 APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEES 
50 
10.2 AMENDMENTS TO THE PROTOCOL 
51 
10.3 CONSENT 
52 
10.3.1 OBTAINING 
52 
10.3.2 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 
52 
10.3.3 MODIFICATION TO INFORMED CONSENT 
52 
10.4 CONFIDENTIALITY 
53 
10.5 DEVIATIONS 
53 
10.5.1 MANAGEMENT OF DEVIATIONS 
54 
10.6 DECLARATION OF INTEREST 
54 
10.7 ACCESS TO INFORMATION 
54 
10.8 AUXILIARY CARE AND SUBSEQUENT TO THE COMPLETION OF THE STUDY 
54 
10.9 BIOSECURITY ASPECTS 
54 
10.10  FINAL REPORT AND PUBLICATION OF RESULTS 
55 
10.10.1 FINAL REPORT 
55 
10.10.2 COMMUNICATION OF RESULTS 
55 
10.10.3 PUBLICATION OF RESULTS 
55 
11. REFERENCES 
59 
12. SIGNATURE PAGE 
65 
12.1 SIGNATURES OF THE SPONSOR'S REPRESENTATIVES 
65 
12.2 INVESTIGATOR 
65 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 8 of 65 
 
 
Index of tables, figures and illustrations 
Table 1. Administrative structure .................................................................................................... 11 
Table 2. Anti-inflammatories .............................................................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Table 3. Results of phase III studies ................................................................................................. 18 
Table 4. Quali-quantitative formulation of PRO-145 ......................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Table 5 Method of measuring variables ............................................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Table 6. Scale for anterior chamber cellularity .................................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Table 7. Flare scale .............................................................................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Table 8. Algorithm of Karch and Lasagna modified by Naranjo ........ ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
 
Figure 1. Cascade of inflammation ..................................................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Figure 2. Study design ......................................................................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Figure 3. Minimum organization of the center .................................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Figure 4. Diagram of the study ............................................................ ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Figure 5. Attention to the adverse event ........................................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
 
Illustration 1. LOCS III ....................................................................................................................... 13 
Illustration 2. Efron scale for conjunctival hyperemia ....................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
Illustration 3. Efron scale for corneal edema ..................................... ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 9 of 65 
 
3. Index of abbreviations 
 
NSAIDs  
 
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 
AV 
 
              Visual acuity 
BH  
 
              Blood count 
bid  
 
 
twice a day 
BPC 
 
             Good clinical practices 
C  
 
             Cortical opacity 
CCA  
 
             Cellularity in the anterior chamber 
IEC 
 
             Research Ethics Committee 
CI 
 
             Informed Consent 
COX  
 
             Cyclooxygenase 
CRF  
 
             Case Report Form (Case Report Form) 
CV 
 
             Visual capacity 
DFB  
 
             Difluoroprednisolone butyrate 
DFBA                               Difluoroprednisolone butyrate acetate 
EA / EAS                         Adverse event / serious adverse event 
FDA                                  Food and Drug Administration (Food and Drug Administration) 
GCR                                   Retinal central thickness 
ICH                          
 International Conference on Harmonization (for its acronym in English 
International Conference on Harmonization) 
IP  
Principal investigator of the clinical study 
LIO  
Intraocular lens 
LOCS  
Crystalline Opacification Classification System (Lens Opacities Classification 
System) 
NC 
 Kernel color 
NO  
Opalescence of the nucleus 
P  
Posterior capsular opacity 
PIO 
 intraocular pressure 
qid  
Four times a day 
QS  
Blood chemistry 
VDF  
Verification of source documents 
 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 10 of 65 
 
 
 
 Page left intentionally blank

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 11 of 65 
 
4. Administrative structure of the study 
The administrative structure of the sponsoring party, corresponding to Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of 
C.V. is shown in Table 1. Administrative structure. 
Function 
Contact name 
Affiliation ¥ 
Medical 
responsible 
for the study 
Dr. Leopoldo Martín Baiza Durán 
leopoldo.baiza@sophia.com.mx 
Medical Director and Regulatory 
Affairs 
Director of 
the study 
QFB. Francisco García Vélez 
francisco.garcia@sophia.com.mx 
Clinical Operations Manager 
Scientific 
Comittee 
Dr. Oscar Olvera Montaño 
oscar.olvera@sophia.com.mx 
Ophthalmologist Investigator 
Scientific 
Comittee 
Dr. en C. Ricardo Alonso Llamas Velázquez 
ricardo.llamas@sophia.com.mx 
Clinical Pharmacologist 
Scientific 
Comittee 
Dra. en C. Patricia del Carmen Muñoz Villegas 
patricia.munoz@sophia.com.mx 
Medical Editor 
¥ Employees of Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V Av. Paseo del Norte No.5255, Col. Guadalajara Technology Park, 
Carretera Guadalajara-Nogales Km13.5 C.P. 45010 Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico Tel +52 (33) 3000 4200 
Table 1. Administrative structure 
Table 1. Administrtive structure 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 12 of 65 
 
 
 
 Page left intentionally blank

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 13 of 65 
 
5. Introduction 
5.1 Theoretical framework 
A cataract is the opacity of the lens, it affects the visual function in different ways depending on its 
characteristics. Cataracts are of multifactorial origin, according to their pathophysiology they can be 
classified as senile cataracts, congenital, induced by medications, traumatic, metabolic and 
associated with uveitis. [1] Nevertheless, most are related to age, so they are more common in the 
elderly. [2] Cataracts are the leading cause of blindness in the world, responsible for 51% of global 
blindness, which in 2010 represented nearly 20 million people. By increasing life expectancy, the 
number of people with cataracts is expected to increase directly proportionally. Cataracts are also 
an important cause of decreased visual acuity (AV) and low vision in developed and developing 
countries. [3] In Mexico there are three internationally recognized studies on cataract blindness, 
which report that cataracts are responsible for 48 to 64% of blindness in the study population. [4] 
[5] [6]  
The classification of cataracts based on their "maturation", degree of opacity or progression has not 
been sufficient for epidemiological or therapeutic studies of cataracts. The lens opacity classification 
system III (LOCS III, for its acronym in English of Lens Opacities Classification System III) is a 
standardized system used to stage and compare the type and degree of severity of cataracts. [7] It 
was derived from LOCS II [8], and consists of three sets of standardized photographs (See Figure 1. 
LOCS III). The classification evaluates four characteristics, nuclear opalescence (NO), nuclear color 
(NC), cortical opacity (C), and posterior subcapsular opacity (P). The use of this classification has 
allowed a better record of the progression of the cataract, decreases the inter-observer subjective 
influence and allows the creation of peri-surgical plans according to the needs of each patient. [9] 
Ilustration 1. LOCS III 
 
There is no minimum AV, nor a minimum classification of the degree of cataract, defined and 
globally accepted for the indication of cataract surgery; nevertheless, with the advent of new 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 14 of 65 
 
surgical techniques, more advanced phacoemulsification machines, the introduction of 
femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (known as FLACS, after its acronym in English 
femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery) and the evolution of Intraocular lenses (LIO), cataract 
surgery has been allowed to be consistently safer and with a high predictability of good visual 
rehabilitation, often not requiring visual correction by means of aerial lenses. This has led to the AV 
to indicate cataract surgery in industrialized countries from 20/30 or less. [10] [11]  
In 2014 it was estimated that 2 million cataract surgeries were performed in the United States of 
America (USA). [12] For 2015, 3.6 million surgeries were estimated in the USA and more than 20 
million worldwide. [13] In Mexico, it is estimated that the rate of cataract surgery is 1,530 surgeries 
per million inhabitants. [14] 
Like any other type of surgery, cataract surgery induces an inflammatory response despite advances 
in surgical technique. Inflammation after cataract surgery continues to be a common cause of 
patient discomfort, delayed recovery and decreased visual outcome due to posterior synechiae, 
uveitis, macular edema and secondary glaucoma, among other conditions. [15] [16] [17] 
The physical trauma associated with cataract surgery, including the alteration of the blood-brain 
barrier, induces an inflammatory response and the release of mediators of inflammation such as 
prostaglandins and leukotrienes (See Figure 1). Prostaglandins are released naturally from the iris 
and ciliary body and migrate to the retina, after cataract surgery. [18] The inflammatory response, 
in turn, can activate the cascade of the immune response, releasing additional neutrophils, 
macrophages, T lymphocytes and mediators of inflammation. [18] [19] [20]  
Inflammation after cataract surgery presents with signs such as flare, cellularity in the anterior 
chamber, conjunctival hyperemia, edema, leukocyte migration, proliferation of fibroblasts and 
scarring. [21] [22] Persistent inflammation causes discomfort to the patient, increased rate of 
macular edema and compromises the visual result. [15] [16] [22] Potential complications of 
postoperative inflammation without treatment include pain, photophobia, synechiae, cellular 
precipitates, uveitis, increased intraocular pressure (IOP), and glaucoma. [23] Because of this, the 
management of postoperative inflammation is mandatory in modern cataract surgery. [17] 
The development of postoperative inflammation is variable from case to case, depending on factors 
such as the use of drugs prior to surgery, the hardness of the lens, the technique used and the 
presence of concomitant diseases. [24] [25] Several studies have demonstrated the correlation 
between the increase in the degree of NO and NC of the LOCS III classification and the increase in 
the power of phacoemulsification and the effective time of ultrasound in cataract surgery, together 
with the increase in post-surgical inflammation. [26] [27] [9] 
There are no established treatment guidelines to prevent or reduce inflammation after eye surgery. 
[28] [19] Therefore, the treatment includes pre and postoperative anti-inflammatory therapy with 
corticosteroids and / or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) see Table 2. Anti-
inflammatories. Because it is impossible to predict which patients will develop clinically significant 
inflammation, post-surgical use of anti-inflammatory drugs is routinely performed, with 
corticosteroids being the most commonly used. [28] [29] 
 
 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 15 of 65 
 
 
 
 
Figure 1. Cascade of inflammation 
Table 2. Anti-inflammatories 
Group 
Mechanism of action 
Effect 
Effectiveness 
Security 
Cortico-
steroids 
Inhibition 
of 
phospholipase A2 
It 
decreases 
the 
production 
of 
prostacyclines, 
thromboxane 
A2, 
prostaglandins 
and 
leukotrienes. 
Alterates 
the 
inflammatory 
mediators 
of 
transcription. Modulates 
the activity and migration 
of inflammatory cells. 
Decreases 
the 
presence 
of 
inflammatory cells. 
And 
the 
postoperative 
pain. 
Its adverse effects 
include: cataracts, 
ocular 
hypertension, 
glaucoma, 
decreased scarring 
NSAIDs 
Alters 
transcription 
and translation. 
Suppression 
of 
prostaglandin production 
Similar 
to 
corticosteroids. 
They have shown 
better results in 
decreasing 
the 
breakdown of the 
blood-gas barrier. 
Decreased corneal 
sensitivity. 
 
Corticosteroids are traditionally used to control eye inflammation in the short term and are the most 
used therapeutic option after cataract surgery. Compared with NSAIDs, corticosteroids have a 
greater range of activity in the control of inflammation, by acting at multiple points in the 
inflammation cascade, including both the cyclooxygenase (COX) and phospholipase A2 pathways, 
reducing prostaglandins. and leukotrienes. See Figure 1. [19] 
5.2 Definition of the problem and fundamental reason 
The inflammation after ocular surgery continues to be an undesirable consequence despite multiple 
advances in technology and surgical techniques. Control and prevent inflammation is of great 
interest to the surgeon in his eagerness to achieve optimal results. 
Proliferation of the cell parent
Mast cells
Membrane 
phospholipid
s
Membrane 
stabilization
Platelet 
activating 
factor
Triptase
Histamine
Phospholipase 
A2
Arachidonic 
acid
Cyclooxygenas
Cyclic 
endoperoxides
Prostacyclins
Prostaglandins
Thromboxane 
A2
Lipoxygenase
Hydroperoxides
Leukotrienes
Cortico-
steroids 
NSAIDs 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 16 of 65 
 
Although it is true that currently cataract surgery does not necessarily result in significant 
inflammation, there is still a portion of patients who will experience some type of postoperative 
inflammation, which could potentially alter the visual result, not to mention the comfort of the 
patient. 
Because it is impossible to determine who these patients will be, most surgeons use prophylactic 
regimens of anti-inflammatory drugs, because of their wide range of action, corticosteroids are the 
cornerstone of these regimens. 
Difluprednate, the active ingredient of PRO-145, is a potent synthetic difluorinated corticosteroid 
derived from prednisolone, which in its ophthalmic formulation comes in the form of an emulsion. 
This gives it the advantage over other corticosteroids that are usually formulated as suspension, 
since it avoids flocculation, sedimentation and poor redispersibility, all of which can lead to dosing 
errors during administration. 
5.3 Background 
Approximately 8 years ago, it was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA), 0.05% difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion (Durezol®, Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Fort Worth, TX) 
for use in the treatment of inflammation and pain associated with eye surgery. Since then, the 
favorable clinical experience of its use has been reported. [30] 
5.3.1 Difluprednate 
Difluprednate (difluoroprednisolone butyrate acetate, or DFBA) is a synthetic difluorinated 
derivative of prednisolone. Originally developed for dermatological application, the molecule owes 
its potency to fluorination at positions C6 and C9. [31] Its anti-inflammatory activity is further 
enhanced by the replacement of the 17-hydroxyl group by butyrate, while its lipophilicity, and 
therefore its corneal penetration, is improved by substituting the 21-hydroxyl group for acetate. 
[32] 
5.3.1.1 Eyeball pharmacokinetics 
Route of administration: Ophthalmic. 
Release: immediate. 
Absorption: after instillation, DFBA is rapidly deacetylated to difluoroprednisolone butyrate (DFB), 
an active metabolite with the same activity profile. [33] The DFB is absorbed in all structures of the 
anterior segment, its levels in the posterior pole and blood are undetectable after an application. 
Metabolism: The acetyl group of the DFBA is rapidly hydrolyzed, nevertheless there is no hydrolysis 
of the DFB during the first hour. 
Elimination: Based on a study with marked DFBA radio, after a single dose radioactivity was detected 
in the anterior and posterior segments, but not in the blood. At 24 hours postinstilation, 78.5% of 
the radioactivity had been excreted, and 99.5% had been eliminated after 7 days. The levels of 
radioactivity did not increase significantly with the increase in the number of doses. After 28 
instillations applied in 7 days, concentrations in the anterior segment increased 1.5 times compared 
to the single application. There was little accumulation in the blood, noting the rapid metabolism of 
DFB to inert products. [34] [35] [36] 
5.3.1.2 Preclinical studies 
Studies have been done in animal models to assess safety, bioavailability and efficacy. 
Sakaki et al, performed preclinical eye and systemic safety studies of DFBA. In a model in rabbits 
tested two emulsions of DFBA, 0.01% and 0.05%, while in another model in dogs of race beagles 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 17 of 65 
 
tested the formulation of DFBA at 0.05% compared to betamethasone. The intervention consisted 
of the application 4 times a day for one month of the products under investigation. 
Ophthalmological evaluations, studies of blood count (BH) and blood chemistry (QS) were carried 
out, as well as histopathological evaluation. No toxicity was detected in any of the groups. [37] 
In a study of bioavailability in a model in rabbits, carried out by Inue et al, the effect of the 
formulation (emulsion or suspension) and the size of the particle on the bioavailability of DFBA were 
evaluated. In this study it was concluded that the emulsion presents a greater bioavailability than 
the suspension. While the molecule sizes studied (90.3 and 129.3 nm) do not influence the 
bioavailability of the DFBA. [38] 
To verify preclinical efficacy, a post-surgical inflammation model was created in rabbits. In this 
model the DFBA 0.05% against betamethasone 0.1% was compared, after a paracentesis a drop of 
DFBA, betamethasone or saline solution was applied. An effect of difluprednate equivalent to 
betamethasone was found in the decrease in flare. [39] 
In another study with three models of induced uveitis, two in rats (induced by melanin and by 
endotoxins) and another in rabbits (induced by bovine serum albumin), it was reported that 0.05% 
DFBA was statistically superior in anti-inflammatory activity when compared to 0.1% 
betamethasone (P <0.01) in all three models, decreasing signs of inflammation (cellularity and flare). 
[40] 
In Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. safety and toxicity studies were conducted in albino rabbits New 
Zealand, the ophthalmic emulsion of DFBA was applied 0.05% four times a day for 90 days, 
compared to the vehicle; clinical signs and histopathological examination were evaluated, no 
statistically significant differences were found between interventions, even in the increase in PIO. 
[41] 
Bioavailability studies were also carried out in which two formulations, a suspension and an 
emulsion of DFBA at 0.05% were evaluated, compared to the reference medicine Durezol® and 
against prednisolone acetate 1%. Between the formulation of suspension and emulsion, a greater 
bioavailability for the emulsion was found in all the points, consistent with that reported in the 
literature. When comparing the emulsion, PRO 145, against Durezol®, no statistically significant 
differences were found. [42] [43]  
5.3.1.3 Clinical safety studies 
In 1999, a phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety of three DFBA formulations, at 0.002%, 
0.01% and 0.05% in 18 healthy subjects. The intervention consisted of a single drop of the product 
under investigation in one eye, and in the contralateral one drop of the vehicle. Evaluation of the 
ocular surface and an electroretinogram were performed 24 hours after instillation. The tolerability 
and symptomatology was evaluated through questioning by means of a questionnaire. Adverse 
events (AEs) reported were mild and not necessarily related to instillation. [44]  

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 18 of 65 
 
In another phase I study, two concentrations of DFBA, 0.01% and 0.05%, were evaluated in 12 
subjects. The intervention consisted in the application of two drops of the investigational drug four 
times a day for 7 days, in one eye, and in the contralateral vehicle. The results of this study showed 
that either of the two formulations was well tolerated and had little systemic effects. EAs were mild, 
PIO increased three times, but none of them exceeded normal limits. [44] 
At Sophia Laboratories, a phase I study was conducted comparing the PRO145 emulsion against 
Durezol® and placebo, with an application of 1 drop qid for 10 days, continuing with a bid drop for 
5 days, in both eyes. We included 27 healthy subjects, randomly divided into 3 groups corresponding 
to the 3 interventions. Symptoms and clinical signs, including PIO, were evaluated. In addition, 
laboratory tests, QS, BH and liver enzymes were performed. No statistically significant differences 
were found between groups. No increase in PIO was reported in any of the subjects. It was 
concluded that the safety profile of PRO-145 in equal circumstances is similar to that of Durezol®. 
[45]  
5.3.1.4 Clinical efficacy studies 
In a phase IIa study, the effectiveness of two formulations of DFBA, 0.002% and 0.05%, administered 
4 times a day for seven days after cataract surgery was checked. In this comparative study, of parallel 
groups, double blind, randomized, only 6 patients were enrolled, due to strict eligibility criteria. Both 
formulations proved to be effective in the management of inflammation, determined by the 
quantification of CCA and flare. [44] 
In a multicenter, parallel group study, with active control, phase IIb, the efficacy and safety of DFBA 
at 0.05% against betamethasone was compared in the treatment of postoperative inflammation. 24 
subjects were included, the study concluded that DFBA was as effective as betamethasone and with 
an acceptable safety profile. The variables evaluated were CCA and flare for efficacy and EA for 
safety [44] 
There are reports of multicentric phase 3 studies of the use of DFBA for the control of inflammation 
in two different models: in the management of postoperative inflammation and in the treatment of 
inflammation by anterior uveitis. The main characteristics of these studies are shown in Table 3. 
After the commercialization of Durezol®, DFBA ophthalmic emulsion efficacy studies have continued 
to be reported at 0.05%, both in the management of inflammation due to endogenous anterior 
uveitis and secondary to intraocular surgery. Donnenfeld reported the results of a multicentre study 
comparing the effect of DFBA at 0.05% on corneal thickness and visual acuity, using pulse doses 
after cataract surgery, against prednisolone acetate at 1%. In the study, 52 patients were enrolled, 
who provided both eyes for the evaluation; in a randomized manner, one eye received DFBA and 
the contralateral one prednisolone; the dosage consisted of 7 doses during the two hours prior to 
surgery, 3 additional doses after surgery before being discharged, the rest of the first day a drop 
every 2 hours, followed by qid for a week and bid in the second week. In this study, DFBA was 
superior to prednisolone. [46] Dosage twice a day has also been investigated, demonstrating high 
effectiveness in the management of inflammation and postoperative pain. [47] 
 
Table 3. Results of phase III studies 
Author 
(N) 
Disease model 
Intervention 
Comparator 
Variables 
Result 
Ohji [48] 
182 
Postsurgical 
DFBA 
0.05% 
qid 
for 14 days 
Betamethaso
ne 0.1% qid 
for 14 days 
Cellularity 
Flare 
DFBA 
is 
as 
effective 
as 
betamethasone 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 19 of 65 
 
Author 
(N) 
Disease model 
Intervention 
Comparator 
Variables 
Result 
Overall score 
of 
inflammation 
Adverse 
events 
and 
with 
a 
favorable safety 
profile. 
Korenfeld [49] 
438 
Postsurgical 
DFBA 
0.05% 
qid 
or 
DFBA 
0.05% bid 
Placebo with 
the 
same 
scheme 
Cellularity 
Flare  
Pain 
Discomfort 
Photophobia 
Adverse 
events 
Both 
DFBA 
posologies were 
effective 
compared 
to 
placebo. Good 
security profile 
Ohno [50] 
136 
Previous 
endogenous 
uveitis 
15 
days 
followed by 
dose 
reduction. 
Betamethaso
ne 0.15 qid 
for 15 days 
Cellularity 
Flare 
Overall score 
of 
inflammation 
Adverse 
events 
Cellularity 
Flare 
Overall score 
of 
inflammation 
Adverse 
events 
DFBA 
is 
as 
effective 
as 
betamethasone 
and 
with 
a 
favorable safety 
profile. 
Mochizuki 
[51] 
19 
Severe 
refractory 
endogenous 
uveitis (did not 
respond 
to 
betamethason
e) 
DFBA 
0.05% 
qid 
for 15 days 
Any 
Cellularity 
Flare 
Overall score 
of 
inflammation 
Adverse 
events 
Significant 
improvement in 
relation to the 
baseline. 
Sirion 
Therapeutics 
Inc [52] 
90 
Previous 
endogenous 
uveitis 
DFBA 0.05% 
qid for 14 
days, 
followed by 
2 weeks of 
dose 
reduction 
and 2 weeks 
of follow-up. 
Prednisolone 
1% qid for 14 
days, followed 
by 2 weeks of 
dose 
reduction and 
2 weeks more 
follow-up 
Cellularity 
 
A 
greater 
proportion 
of 
patients in the 
DFBA 
group 
decreased 
inflammation. 
In the pediatric population, the efficacy and safety of DFBA for the management of postoperative 
inflammation has also been evaluated, demonstrating an efficacy and safety profile similar to that 
of prednisolone acetate 1% when used in children aged 0-3 years. cataract surgery [53] 
5.3.1.5. Safety and tolerability 
It is now recognized that topical corticosteroids can lead to an increase in PIO. It is possible to 
present ocular hypertension in a repeated dose treatment as soon as in a week, an effect that may 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 20 of 65 
 
be more pronounced in glaucomatous eyes. [44] Prolonged elevation of the PIO is associated with 
damage to the optic nerve, with subsequent alteration of the visual field and possibly AV. 
Another well-documented effect of steroid use includes the formation of posterior subcapsular 
cataracts and the predisposition to ocular infections. 
Studies previously reported have shown that DFBA causes an increase in PIO in a small number of 
exposed patients. This increase was resolved in all patients upon discontinuation of treatment or 
with the help of topical hypotensives. Compared with betamethasone and prednisolone applied 
with the same frequency, the incidence of PIO elevation was equal, indicating an acceptable safety 
profile. [44] [49] [48] [50] 
5.4 Justification 
Control and prevent inflammation is one of the main concerns of the ophthalmologist surgeon to 
achieve optimal results after surgery. 
Steroids are the drugs of first choice for the control of inflammation due to its broad anti-
inflammatory activity and its safety profile. 
PRO-145 is a formulation of 0.05% DFBA in ophthalmic emulsion, developed by Sophia Laboratories, 
S.A. of C.V. which has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in preclinical and clinical phase I 
studies, as well as a bioavailability in animal models similar to that reported for Durezol®. With this 
background, a phase III clinical study is required to verify the efficacy profile of PRO-145. 
5.5 Objectives and hypothesis 
5.5.1 General purpose 
To evaluate the efficacy of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 in the treatment of inflammation and 
pain after phacoemulsification. 
5.5.2 Specific objectives 
- Evaluate the efficacy of PRO-145 through the elimination of anterior chamber cellularity (CCA) at 
the final visit. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the elimination of CCA in the final 
visit 
 
5.5.3 Secondary objectives 
 
- Evaluate the efficacy of PRO-145 through the decrease of CCA in the ordinal scale during visits 
- Evaluate the efficacy of PRO-145 by decreasing the central thickness of the retina (GCR). 
- Evaluate the efficacy of PRO-145 by decreasing clinical corneal edema. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of PRO-145 through the reduction of conjunctival hyperemia. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of PRO-145 by means of the decrease of flare. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of PRO-145 in reducing symptoms: pain and photophobia. 
- To evaluate the tolerability of PRO-145 by means of the interrogation of ocular symptomatology 
post-stiffening. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 21 of 65 
 
- Evaluate the safety of PRO-145 through the CV, the PIO and the incidence of EA 
- To evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the decrease of CCA in the ordinal 
scale during visits 
- Evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the decrease in GCR. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the decrease of clinical corneal 
edema. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the reduction of conjunctival 
hyperemia. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the decrease in flare. 
- Evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone acetate 1% in reducing symptoms: pain and photophobia. 
- To assess the tolerability of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the interrogation of ocular 
symptomatology postinstilation. 
- Evaluate the safety of prednisolone acetate 1% by means of the CV, the PIO and the incidence of 
EA. 
5.5.4 Hypothesis 
H0: The use of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 is not effective when decreasing the inflammatory 
response evaluated by means of cellularity in the anterior chamber, after phacoemulsification. 
Ha: The use of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 is effective in decreasing the inflammatory 
response evaluated by means of cellularity in the anterior chamber, after phacoemulsification. 
5.6 Design and plan of the study. 
Phase III clinical trial, parallel, controlled, randomized, double blind. Participants will be postsurgical 
phacoemulsification patients, who will be randomly assigned to 2 intervention groups with steroidal 
anti-inflammatory drugs. One group will receive the PRO-145 test formulation and the other group 
will be exposed to prednisolone acetate 1%. 
 
 
 
 
Figure 2. Study design. 
Randomization (postsurgical 
phacoemulsification patients) n = 178
PRO-145 (n=89)
Effectiveness
Security
Tolerability
Prednisolone acetate 1%(n=89)
Effectiveness
Security
Tolerability

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 22 of 65 
 
5.6.1 Discussion of the study design. 
In clinical research it is common to propose trials with the objective of evaluating the efficacy of a 
product under investigation against a reference medicine or active control, in order to compare the 
new product under investigation from a clinical or statistical point of view to a drug commercially 
available 
The clinical trial is the ideal model to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions, it allows 
obtaining the highest quality evidence among different types of research. The characteristics of 
randomization and double blind, allow to avoid biases (selection, evaluation, etc.) that can not be 
avoided with other models. Being controlled and parallel groups allows distinguishing the effects of 
interventions in isolation. 
The proposed clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability profile of a 
formulation of DFBA 0.05% and compare it against the safety, tolerability and efficacy profile of 
commercially available steroid administration, and widely used for its efficacy profile and known 
security.  
 
6. Material and methods. Participants, interventions and variables. 
6.1 Study Center. 
The present study will be performed in ophthalmology offices duly equipped and registered for their 
proper functioning. According to the needs of the sponsor, these may be private or public, be 
attached to a hospital or clinic or be independent. 
This is a multicentre study that is intended to be carried out in Guadalajara, Mexico City and 
Monterrey. 
6.1.1 Organization of the center. 
Each study center will have a principal investigator (IP). The IP is the leading ophthalmology 
specialist in the clinical study.  
The IP is responsible for forming a multidisciplinary research team to carry out the clinical study 
according to protocol, under its scientific guidance. It is the prerogative of the IP the design of the 
organization of its center and the selection of the personnel that will perform the functions. 
Notwithstanding, the minimum organization of the research team requested by the sponsor 
requires the figure of sub-researcher, study coordinator and pharmacist. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 3. Minimum organization of the center. 
Principal 
investigator
Subinvestigator
Pharmacist
Study 
coordinator

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 23 of 65 
 
Any person to whom the IP designates, under his / her responsibility, a part of the follow-up of the 
study (co-investigator, sub-researcher, nurse, etc.) or a specific function of participation in the study 
(pharmacist, administrative assistant, study coordinator, etc.) It must appear in the "Delegation of 
Responsibilities" format. 
The "Delegation of Responsibilities" and the "Organizational Chart of the Center" must be delivered 
to the sponsor before the start of the study and updated if the members or their responsibilities are 
changed. 
6.1.2 Documentation to be delivered to the sponsor. 
The IP must be delivered to the sponsor, before the start of the study: 
- Curriculum vitae updated, in Spanish, dated and signed (maximum 10 pages), of the IP and the 
staff that integrates its organizational chart of the center. 
- Copy of IP academic certifications (degree certificate and specialty diploma in ophthalmology, 
federal professional certificates) 
- Copy of academic certifications of the maximum degree obtained, from each one of the members 
of your research team, that cover their capacity to perform the delegated functions. 
- Copy of operating notice or similar issued by corresponding regulatory entity (When applicable) 
- Certificate of good clinical practice in force. If the issuing institution does not specify the validity 
period in the certificate, the date of issue of the certificate must not exceed one year. 
6.1.3 Closure of the center. 
The closing of the center will be carried out once the last visit of the last included subject previously 
agreed between the sponsor and the IP has been made. The closing process will be according to the 
internal operating procedures of the sponsor. 
It is the sponsor's prerogative to prematurely close a study center, it must inform the IP the reasons 
for the closure. 
6.2 Eligibility criteria. 
6.2.1 Inclusion criteria. 
-Signed informed consent. 
-Age ≥ 18 years. 
-Both sexes. 
-Postoperative cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. 
o That they have met the criteria for phacoemulsification and a classification of the 
LOCS III cataract of NO ≥2 and NC ≥2. 
6.2.2 Exclusion criteria. 
6.2.2.1 General criteria. 
  • Pregnant women, lactating or planning to get pregnant. 
  • Women of reproductive age and who do not have a hormonal contraceptive method, intrauterine    
device or bilateral tubal obstruction. 
  • Participation in another clinical research study ≤ 30 days before the baseline visit. 
  • Have previously participated in this same study with the contralateral eye. 
  • That they can not comply with their attendance at appointments or with all the requirements of 
the protocol. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 24 of 65 
 
6.2.2.2 Medical and therapeutic criteria. 
       • Surgery in both eyes in the same surgical shift. 
       • Time> 24 hours after having surgery. 
       • LIO placement outside the bag. 
       • Presentation of rupture of the posterior capsule, with or without the presence of vitreous. 
       • Carrying out an iridectomy, or lesion of the pupillary sphincter during phacoemulsification 
surgery. 
       • Scheduled for surgical intervention in the contralateral eye during the study period. 
       • History of glaucoma or ocular hypertension. 
       • History of increased PIO with the use of steroids. 
       • PIO ≥24. 
       • History of uveitis. 
       • Presence of corneal abrasion or corneal ulceration in the study eye. 
       • Use of steroids or topical NSAIDs, 24 hours prior to surgery and until the start of instillation of      
investigational drugs. 
       • Use of anticoagulants, systemic steroids or immunomodulators in the last two weeks 
       • Periocular injection of any steroid in the study eye 4 weeks before the start of the instillation 
of the investigational drugs. 
       • Use of storage steroids 2 months prior to the start of instillation of investigational drugs. 
       • Presence or suspicion of keratitis and / or viral, bacterial or fungal conjunctivitis. 
       • Presence or suspicion of endophthalmitis. 
       • Presence or suspicion of toxic syndrome of the anterior segment. 
       • Severe corneal edema that does not allow assessment of the anterior chamber 
       • Macular diseases. 
 
 
 
 
• 
Diabetes Mellitus with A1C ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol / mol) or fasting glucose (no caloric intake by 
≥ 8 hours) of ≥ 126 mg / dL (7.0 mmol / L). 
• 
Any disease or condition that requires the use of topical or systemic NSAIDs during the time 
of intervention. 
• 
Any disease or condition that requires the use of steroids other than topical ophthalmic 
application. 
• 
Subjects with a single eye. 
• 
Any condition or disease that at the discretion of the IP does not make the subject suitable 
for the study. 
• 
Known hypersensitivity to the components of the products under investigation. 
6.2.3 Elimination criteria. 
• 
Decision of the subject. The subject can decide unilaterally to withdraw from the study at 
any time, should inform the IP. 
• 
Pregnancy. 
• 
Presence of a serious adverse event (EAS). 
• 
Investigator's decision: 
o Due to the presence of an AD that at the discretion of the IP threatens the health of the 
subject and requires the prescription of a medicine not authorized in the protocol 
       • Any deviation to the protocol that affects the safety of the subject. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 25 of 65 
 
6.2.4 Identification of the subject. 
The patients of the study will be identified by a number and the initials of their name. 
The initials of the study subject will be obtained by starting with the first letter of the name, followed 
by the first letter of the first surname and the first of the second, obtaining maximum three letters, 
in case the person has two names or a compound surname will always be used the first letter of the 
first name or last name composed. 
Example: 
1. Adolfo Daniel Mercado Carrizales 
to. Initials: AMC 
2. Juan De la Torre Orozco 
to. Initials: JDO 
3. Luis Carlos Pérez-Gómez Ramírez 
to. Initials LPR 
In the counting stage, the participant number will be assigned consecutively, using 3 consecutive 
digits. Once the subject has been selected, he will be assigned a number with which he will be 
identified throughout the study. Said code will be composed of eight numbers in the following order 
from left to right:  
• 
three digits of the molecule under study according to the denomination by the sponsor. 
• 
two digits corresponding to the research center number 
• 
three digits of the number consecutive to their inclusion assigned in the research center. 
 
 
 
Example: 
 
6.3 Intervention . 
6.3.1 Managed treatments. 
The treatments will be administered four times a day, every 4 hours during the waking period, the 
first 14 days; later it will be completed with 14 days of application in a dose reduction scheme, this 
scheme will be at the discretion of the IP. The suggested schedule for applications four times a day 
is at 9:00 am (09:00 am), 1:00 pm (1:00 pm), 5:00 pm (5:00 pm) and 9:00 pm (9:00 pm). ) for 14 
days. Interventions will only be applied in the postoperative eye. 
 
145-01-001 
Key to the 
molecule 
Center number 
number of 
inclusion 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 26 of 65 
 
6.3.1.1 Treatment in study. 
• 
PRO-145 . 
o Active ingredients: Difluprednate 0.05% 
o Pharmaceutical form: ophthalmic emulsion. 
o Prepared by: Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. 
o Dosage: 1 drop 4 times a day during the period of vigil in the operated eye, for 14 
days. Dose reduction for 14 days at the discretion of the principal investigator. 
o Description of the emulsion: white to slightly yellow emulsion. 
o Description of container: sterile multi-dose bottle. 
o The product has certificates of sterility and stability, which are in the master folder 
of the study, and its characteristics are included in the researcher's manual. 
Table 4. Quali-quantitative formulation of PRO-145. 
Active principle 
Quantity 
% 
Function 
Difluprednate 
mg / dL 
0.05 
Anti-inflammatory 
Additives 
0.50 
% 
Function 
Castor oil 
Quantity 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Polysorbate 80 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Disodium edetate dihydrate 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Glycerin 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Citric acid 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Benzalkonium chloride 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Sodium hydroxide 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Sodium citrate dihydrate 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Hydrochloric acid 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Water for cbp injectable 
preparation (1) 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Not shown 
Qualitative composition of the formulation PRO-145. The agents that constitute the active substance and the additives are shown. 
Pharmaceutical form: emulsion. (1) How much is enough to 
6.3.1.2 Reference treatment. 
• 
Prednefrin® SF . 
o Active ingredients: prednisolone acetate 1% 
o Pharmaceutical form: Ophthalmic suspension 
o  Prepared by: Allergan, S.A. of C.V. 
o Dosage: 1 drop 4 times a day during the period of vigil in the operated eye, for 14 
days. Dose reduction for 14 days at the discretion of the principal investigator. 
o Description of suspension: whitish suspension. 
o Description of the container: 5ml multi-dose dropper bottle. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 27 of 65 
 
o The data on characterization of the reference product will be taken from the insert. 
6.3.2 Strategies to improve adherence and procedure to monitor adherence. 
Adherence to the intervention is essential to achieve the objectives of clinical research, adherence 
is defined as: "the extent to which the behavior of people (including taking medication) corresponds 
to the indications of the provider of services of health "[54] Effective treatments could be 
interpreted as ineffective due to poor adherence. 
Strategies: 
• 
At each visit, the IP reaffirms in the research subject the importance of following the 
indicated regimen and will ask if it has had any inconvenience in following the indications, 
if necessary it will retrain the subject in the application of the medications. 
• 
In case the IP considers it necessary, the subjects that have an email, the IP or the person 
designated for this, will send them emails to remember the adherence to the treatment and 
the importance of it. The content of the emails will be previously submitted to the research 
ethics committee for approval. 
• 
By means of the revision of the daily tool of the subject. 
Procedure to monitor adherence: 
For more than four decades, numerous investigations have been conducted on the proper way to 
measure and quantify adherence to medications, nevertheless none has reached consensus to 
establish itself as the gold standard, both in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. [55] [56] [57] 
[58] [59] [60] [61] [62] 
There are different procedures to measure the adherence of pharmacological interventions. The 
most common procedure includes self-reports, these include: patient interviews, questionnaires 
and self-monitoring journals. Its strengths are speed, flexibility, low cost and ease of 
implementation; they have a high degree of specificity for non-adherence, nevertheless the 
sensitivity and reliability for adherence is low. [62] [63] 
The biochemical measurement of the drug, or its metabolite, is one of the methods that best 
confirms the use of the drug. Nevertheless, in addition to raising costs and being impractical, it is of 
little use in the context of ophthalmic applications, since concentrations at the peripheral level could 
be undetectable; and samples from other tissues imply more invasive methods that would not be 
advisable. [62] 
Medication counting is another way to measure adherence. Classically referred to as "pills 
counting", in ophthalmology it is translated to the weight of the bottle. This is a simple, economical 
and non-invasive method. The main disadvantages of this method are: 1. The application of the 
medication can not be confirmed (it could have been intentionally thrown or instilled outside the 
eye) and 2. It depends on the subject bringing the medication back. [62] [63] 
The approach with multiple procedures for measuring adhesion is recommended. Because there is 
no ideal adhesion measurement, it is appropriate to use more than one method when trying to 
achieve results that resemble reality. Selecting two or more methods allows their strengths and 
weaknesses to be compensated, in order to more reliably capture adherence levels. [61] 
• 
The evaluation of the adherence by means of the diary of the subject will be carried out in 
the following way: 
𝐴𝑑= (𝐴𝑟)100/𝐴𝑖 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 28 of 65 
 
Where: 
Ad = Adherence 
Ar = Applications registered in the first 14 days of treatment. 
Ai = Applications indicated for the intervention in the first 14 days of treatment. 
At the sponsor's facilities, the bottles will be weighed at the beginning and at the end of the 
study. The adhesion will be calculated considering: the weight of the empty bottle, the weight 
of the drop, the weight of the bottle with the content, the calculation of the total of drops to 
be applied during the entire time of intervention and the total weight of the drops applied. The 
following simplified formula will be used: 
𝐴𝑑= (𝑃𝑖−𝑃𝑓)100
𝑃𝑇
 
Where: 
Ad = adhesion 
IP = weight of the bottle delivered to the subject at the start 
Pf = weight of the bottle returned by the subject 
PT = weight of the posology indicated for the intervention. 
𝑃𝑇= (𝑃𝑔)𝐺 
 
 
 
Where: 
P_g = weight of the drop of the intervention, determined by the department of research and 
development 
G = number of drops indicated for the intervention 
There is no standardized parameter to define an adequate adherence, it must be defined and 
outlined by the objectives of the research in particular. [62] The efficacy of ophthalmic steroids is 
based on two fundamental principles: 1) The specific type and location of the inflammation 
determines the appropriate route of administration and 2) The treatment should be instituted as 
soon as possible, and the dose should be be high enough and administration frequent enough to 
suppress inflammatory activity. According to the therapeutic utility curve, to establish the limits of 
the therapeutic window, a dosage regimen is required in which 50% of the established doses are 
exceeded, in order to achieve a pharmacological effect. A therapeutic regimen below this value is 
expected a lack of efficacy. Therefore, an adherence of over 60% according to the weight of the 
bottle ensures that it remains within the limits of efficacy of the therapeutic window established in 
the protocol. [64] [65] [66] For the efficacy analysis, only subjects with a minimum adherence of 
80% by means of the subject's daily tool and a minimum of 60% by the weight of the bottle will be 
considered. The variation in the percentage of the measurement method has been chosen 
empirically to counteract the sensitivity and specificity of the same. It is estimated that with a 
minimum adherence of 60% the intervention can exert its expected anti-inflammatory 
pharmacological action. [44]  

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 29 of 65 
 
6.3.3 Treatments and concomitant interventions allowed and prohibited before and during 
the study. 
The subjects admitted correctly to the study, who meet the eligibility criteria, may continue with 
the systemic treatment of the underlying diseases. If during the development of the study they 
require the implementation of a new permitted medication, they may do so. All concomitant 
medications used must be duly reported in the notes of the clinical file and in the corresponding 
section. 
Allowed medications: 
• 
Ophthalmic: 
• 
All permitted medications applied via ophthalmic during the study, must wait a minimum 
period of 10 minutes from the last application of the treatments under study or reference. 
The foregoing in order to avoid the interaction of the treatments in the tear film, based on 
the tear flow index and the physiological tear volume. [67]  
o Tetracaine 0.5% 
o Tropicamide 0.8% / Phenylephrine 5% 
o Any antibiotic 
o Beta-blockers 
o Alpha agonists 
• Administered by a different route to ophthalmic: 
o Medications whose effect may be susceptible to modify any of the parameters of 
efficacy, safety or tolerability of this research protocol should notify their clinical 
monitor or scientific committee of the sponsor to judge the convenience of entry, 
continuation or elimination of the participant as appropriate. 
 
Any medication allowed that is used, besides appearing in the clinical note, must be registered 
in the section of concomitant medications in the CRF. 
- 
Prohibited medications: 
- 
Any medication with ophthalmic application that is not on the list of allowed medications 
- 
Systemic steroids 
- 
Systemic NSAIDs 
- 
Systemic immunomodulators 
- 
Anticoagulants. 
6.3.4 Treatment management. 
The treatments will be provided by Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., for each research center. They 
will be labeled and reconciled. The handling of the treatment will be under the responsibility of the 
IP or a designated member of his team. 
6.3.4.1 Delivery and reception. 
The sponsor will be responsible for delivering the study treatments at the research center according 
to internal procedures. The delivery will be made in closed boxes by means of a courier service or 
directly by the sponsor's staff to the address of the research center according to the study plan. 
The reception will be exclusively carried out by the research center team, including the IP. You must 
check the good condition of the primary packaging (box). In the event that it shows alterations or 
defects in its integrity that from its judgment could have damaged the content, it should report it to 
the sponsor. If the package does not show significant defects, it will proceed to open it. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 30 of 65 
 
Inside you must locate the acknowledgment document and the logger (data logger) of temperature 
and humidity. You should check that the registered temperature and humidity comply with the 
specifications for transport and shelter (see 6.3.4.2 Storage). Subsequently verify the content 
(treatments) with what is reported in the document. In case the document corresponds to the 
content, it will sign the receipt and send it to the sponsor. Otherwise, notify the sponsor.  
In the study center, the personnel assigned by the IP will deliver the corresponding treatment to the 
inpatients. The center must register the medicine delivered. 
6.3.4.2 Storage  
 
The medication must be stored in a secure area with restricted access. Storage should be at room 
temperature to no more than 30 ° Celsius. 
The research center has the obligation to record, in the format designated by the sponsor, the 
temperature and humidity registered in the data logger. This record should include the current 
temperature and humidity, as well as the minimum and maximum of each of these. It must be done 
at least once a day, on business days. 
Said data will be compared by the clinical monitor according to the registration in the data logger.      
6.3.4.3 Return. 
The research subjects will return, to the personnel indicated by the IP in the center, their treatments 
in the final visit. 
 
The refund will be made by the research center when the sponsor indicates it. Prior to the return 
the research center must make a count of the assigned medication and the remaining medication, 
with the aim of creating an inventory which serves for the final filling of the medication return form. 
6.4 Outcome variables. 
6.4.1 Security variables. 
6.4.1.1 Primary outcome variables. 
Visual ability 
Adverse events 
Intraocular pressure. 
6.4.1.2 Tolerability variables. 
Symptomatology postinstillation 
6.4.2 Efficacy variables 
6.4.2.1 Primary outcome variables 
Cellularity in the anterior chamber 
6.4.2.2 Secondary outcome variables 
Visual ability 
Central thickness of the retina 
Clinical corneal edema 
Conjunctival hyperemia 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 31 of 65 
 
Flare 
Ocular symptomatology (pain and photophobia) 
6.4.3 Methods and scales to be used for the measurement of the variables 
The variables and their units of measurement are included in Table 5 Method of measuring 
variables 
Variable 
Unity 
Symbol 
 
Type 
Method of 
measurement 
Visual ability 
Decimals 
 
--- 
C. Continuous 
Primer 
Cellularity in the 
anterior chamber 
Degrees 
--- 
 
C. Ordinal 
Direct observation 
(Biomicroscopy) 
Clinical corneal 
edema 
 
Degrees 
--- 
C. Ordinal 
Direct observation 
(Biomicroscopy) 
Adverse events 
Number of cases 
N 
C. Discrete 
Count 
Flare 
Degrees 
--- 
C. Ordinal 
Direct observation 
(Biomicroscopy) 
Central thickness 
of the retina 
microns 
µm 
C. Continuous 
Optical coherence 
tomography 
Conjunctival 
hyperemia 
Degrees 
--- 
C. Ordinal 
Direct 
observation 
(Biomicroscopy) 
Intraocular 
pressure 
Milimeters of 
mercury 
mmHg 
C. Continuous 
Tonometry by 
Goldman 
applanation 
Symptomatology 
points 
--- 
C. Discrete 
Interrogation 
Table 5 Method of measuring variables. 
 The following describes the methods and scales that will be used for the measurement of the 
variables, which are in strict alphabetical order of the procedure: 
6.4.3.1 Biomicroscopy 
It is the procedure by which, with the use of the slit lamp or biomicroscope, the ocular structures 
are evaluated thanks to the characteristics of the light source and the optical power of the 
instrument. A full assessment of the previous segment will be made, which will be recorded in the 
clinical file. 
By means of biomicroscopy, conjunctival hyperemia, clinical corneal edema, anterior chamber 
cellularity and flare will be evaluated. 
Conjunctival hyperemia is defined as the simplest reaction of the conjunctiva to a stimulus, a red 
appearance secondary to the vasodilation of the conjunctival vessels of variable intensity. He will 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 32 of 65 
 
graduate using the Efron scale. [68] The number will be reported in the CRF, according to the rating 
granted. (See Illustration 2) 
Illustration 2. Efron scale for conjunctival hyperemia. 
 
 
Corneal edema and transparency is evaluated regularly using the biomicroscope since it offers the 
advantage of variable magnifications and lighting techniques, the subjective evaluation of edema is 
limited to the observation of signs such as microcysts, striae and folds and perhaps the comparison 
of opacity corneal against images of graduation scales. The transparency of the healthy cornea 
results from the fact that it does not absorb light and its light scattering is minimal, so that an 
inflamed cornea does not maintain these characteristics. [69] 
Although several methods have been described in the academic literature for the clinical evaluation 
of inflammation and corneal transparency, there is not one that has been accepted internationally 
or has a widespread use in clinical practice. For the present protocol we will use the Efron scale, 
which is a series of pictorial sections of the cornea, including features such as grooves and folds. 
[68] The Efron scale has a strong correlation with variations in intensity. [69] The number will be 
reported in the CRF according to the rating awarded. (See Illustration 3) 
Illustration 3. Efron scale for corneal edema 
 
In the presence of intraocular inflammation, the increased permeability of the non-pigmented layer 
of the ciliary epithelium, the posterior epithelium of the iris and the vascular endothelium of the iris 
results in the accumulation of cells and proteins (visible to the examiner as flare) in the anterior 
chamber. Using a light beam of 0.2mm X 0.2mm directed obliquely to the anterior chamber with a 
forward inclination of the light source (slit lamp tower) the degree of flare and cellularity will be 
determined according to the group of work of standardization for the nomenclature of uveitis. [70] 
The degree of agreement to the granted rating will be reported in the CRF. (See Table 6 and Table 
7) 
 
Table 6. Scale for anterior chamber cellularity. 
Grade 
Number of cells 
0 
Any 
Normal 0 
Very sllght 1 
Mild 2 
Moderate 3 
Severe 4 
Normal 0 
Very slight 1 
Mild 2 
Moderate 3 
Severe 4 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 33 of 65 
 
½ + 
1-5 
1 + 
6-15 
2 + 
16-25 
3 + 
26-60 
4 + 
More than 60 
Visible in a field of 0.2mm x 0.2mm 
 
Table 7. Flare scale 
Grade 
Number of cells 
0 
There is no flare 
1 + 
Mild 
2 + 
Moderate (iris and crystalline clearly visible) 
3 + 
Marking (iris and crsitalino slightly blurred) 
4 + 
More than 60 (fibrin) 
 
 
6.4.3.2 Visual ability. 
Visual acuity (AV) is a test of visual function. Spatial visual acuity is the ability to distinguish separate 
elements of an object and identify them as a whole. It is quantified as the minimum separation angle 
(located at the nodal point of the eye) between two objects that allows perceiving them as separate 
objects. 
Snellen's notation is described as the distance at which the test is performed, divided by the distance 
at which the letter is vertically equivalent to 5 arc minutes. Thus, at 6 meters a letter 6/6 (20/20) 
equals 5 minutes of arc, a letter 6/12 (20/40) equals 10 minutes, and a letter 6/60 (20/200) equals 
50 minutes The Snellen fraction can also be expressed as a decimal (ie 20/20 = 1 and 20/40 = 0.5). 
[71]  
The AV will be evaluated basally, without refractive correction with the Snellen chart. Which will be 
located in a place with adequate lighting, natural or artificial and at a distance of 3m from the subject 
to be evaluated. The visual acuity of each eye will be taken, starting with a right eye (OD) asking the 
subject to keep both eyes open and using an occluder to cover the left eye (OS); the subject will 
read aloud the lines that the evaluator points out, the line of smaller letters that he reaches to see 
will be annotated by the fractional evaluator as the AV of the OD in the clinical record. Proceed to 
the OS with the same method. 
Subsequently the best refractive correction of the subject will be made and the examination will be 
repeated using the obtained refraction. This result will be reported as visual capacity (CV), it will be 
recorded as a fraction in the clinical file and in the CRF, and in the CRF it will be written in decimal. 
By definition, the CV can not be inferior to the AV. 
6.4.3.3 Evaluation of adverse events. 
The evaluation of adverse events requires a questioning conducted by the IP and the appropriate 
exploratory techniques for its detection. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 34 of 65 
 
The IP will record in the corresponding section of the CRF the EAs that the subjects of the study will 
present. 
The management of the EAs will be done according to what is described in section 9.3 Adverse 
events. 
6.4.3.4 History of symptomatology. 
The subject will be questioned directly about the presence in general (since the last visit) of the 
following symptoms: pain and photophobia. Respond about the severity and frequency of 
symptoms such as: 
Severity: Absent (0), very mild (1), mild (2), moderate (3) and severe (4) 
Frequency: At all times (4), almost at all times (3), 50% of the time (2), almost at no time (1), at any 
time (0). 
The number corresponding to each symptom will be registered in the CRF. 
Symptomatology postinstilation: 
The subject will be questioned if after applying the medication he felt burning, pruritus, a foreign 
body sensation and blurred vision. 
Presence or absence: it will be marked as present (1) or absent (0) in the CRF for each of the 
symptoms questioned 
Frequency: In all applications (4), almost in all applications (3), 50% of applications (2), almost in no 
application (1), in no application (0) 
Duration: More than 5 minutes after the application (3), More than one minute but less than 5 (2), 
Less than one minute (1), Nothing (0). 
The frequency and duration is for all the symptoms in general, the highest frequency and duration 
reported will be reported in the CRF. 
6.4.3.5 Optical coherence tomography. 
By means of optical coherence tomography (OCT) the GCR will be measured; Because this is a 
multicenter study it is not feasible to standardize the brand and model of the OCT to be used, it will 
allow the use of OCT Stratus (Carl Zeiss), Cirrus (Carl Zeiss), Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering) with 
the minimum requirement that the baseline and final OCT are performed with the same OCT, with 
the same protocol and these characteristics are recorded in the clinical note and in the CRF, together 
with the central average.  
6.4.3.6 Tonometry . 
Tonometry is the objective measure of PIO, based primarily on the force required to flatten the 
cornea, or the degree of corneal indentation produced by a fixed force. Goldman's tonometry is 
based on the Imbert-Fick principle. [71] 
The tonometry will be carried out, after instillation of the topical anesthetic, with fluorescein and 
the use of the cobalt blue filter (after the evaluation of the surface staining). There will be 2 shots 
and the average will be calculated, which will be recorded in the clinical file. The average will be 
registered in the CRF.  
6.4.4 Measurement time. 
 
• 
Measurements at the baseline visit 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 35 of 65 
 
• 
Biomicroscopy 
• 
Visual ability 
• 
History of symptomatology 
• 
OCT 
• 
Tonometry 
• 
Evaluation of adverse events 
• 
Measurements in visit 1 and 2 
• 
Biomicroscopy 
• 
Visual ability 
• 
Evaluation of adverse events 
• 
History of symptomatology 
• 
Tonometry 
• 
Measurements in final visit 
• 
Biomicroscopy 
• 
Visual ability 
• 
Adverse event evaluation 
• 
History of symptomatology 
• 
OCT 
• 
Tonometry 
• 
Measurements on security call 
• 
Evaluation of adverse events 
6.5 Schedule and study diagram. 
The baseline visit will be considered on day 1 of the study and should be within the first 24 
postoperative hours, the IP will indicate the subject to start the application of the investigational 
products that same day. If necessary, adjust the scheme so that it complies with the 4 applications 
of day 1; however, in the event that during the opening hours it is not feasible to adjust the 4 
applications, the IP will indicate the application of at least 2 instillations, with a minimum of 2 hours 
between them. 
Visit 1 will be performed in relation to the start of treatment on day 7 with a window period of ± 2 
days. 
The visit 2 and final will be made on days 14 and 29, respectively, with a window period of ± 2 days 
for visit 2 and + 3 days for the final. 
The security call will be made on day 43, with a window period of ± 3 days. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 36 of 65 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.5.1 Schedule 
Procedure 
B 
1 
2 
Final 
LL. S. 
1 
7 ± 2 
14 ± 2 
29 + 3 
43   ± 3 
Eligibility criteria 
X 
 
 
 
 
Informed consent signature 
X 
 
 
 
 
Pregnancy test (if applicable) 
X 
 
 
X 
 
General and ophthalmological clinical history 
X 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive ophthalmologic exploration 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Assignment of subject code 
X 
 
 
 
 
Assignment to treatment group 
X 
 
 
 
 
Delivery of medication and start of instillation 
X 
 
 
 
 
Biomicroscopy 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Visual ability 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
History of symptomatology 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
OCT 
X2 
 
 
X 
 
Tonometry 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Evaluation of concomitant medications 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Delivery of the subject's diary 
X 
 
X 
 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 37 of 65 
 
Procedure 
B 
1 
2 
Final 
LL. S. 
1 
7 ± 2 
14 ± 2 
29 + 3 
43   ± 3 
Evaluation of adverse events 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Continuity evaluation 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
Evaluation of adherence1 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
Indication to change to dose reduction scheme 
 
 
X 
 
 
Return of the medication 
 
 
 
X 
 
1 They are evaluated through the review of the subject's diary; the diary of the subject is reviewed in the three visits, 
but it is only collected in the second and final. 
2The OCT can be done in a window period of 48 hours for this visit. 
 
 
 
 
6.5.2 Procedures to be performed per visit 
Below are the procedures that wiil be carried out in each visit, as well as a brief description of these.  
6.5.2.1 Basal visit 
▪ 
Eligibility criteria: refers to the review by the IP, where it states that the subject can be 
included in the study by meeting the inclusion criteria and not meeting the exclusion 
criteria. See 6.2 Eligibility criteria. 
▪ 
Informed consent signature: refers to the signing of the written informed consent 
document. See 10.3 Consent 
▪ 
Pregnancy test: refers to the performance of a rapid pregnancy test in all women of 
childbearing age who wish to enter the study. By fertile age we understand women who 
have not had their menopause, defined as 12 months since the last menstrual period in 
women over 40 years of age; or those who underwent bilateral hysterectomy or 
oophorectomy. Women of childbearing age with contraceptive methods including bilateral 
tubal obstruction should be tested for pregnancy. This test will be performed by the IP or 
the designated team person according to the instructions of the device delivered by the 
sponsor. 
▪ 
General and ophthalmological clinical history: refers to the technical, clinical and legal 
document in which the patient's health conditions, medical acts and other procedures 
performed on the patient are recorded chronologically. It includes the anamnesis and 
comprehensive ophthalmological exploration that allows to discern the patient's eligibility. 
If the patient is taken from the established consultation of the study center, he / she will be 
able to use the existing clinical history, only having to perform an update. 
▪ 
Comprehensive ophthalmological exploration: refers to the evaluation of the ophthalmic 
structures of the subject, eyelids and appendices, ocular surface, anterior segment and 
posterior segment; not considered within the outcome variables. This evaluation has the 
purpose of identifying alterations that may interfere with the course of the investigation or 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 38 of 65 
 
identify adverse events. This scan will be recorded in the clinical file, in the CRF only what is 
considered an adverse event will be reported. 
▪ 
Assignment of the subject's code: It refers to granting the number that will identify the 
patient throughout the study. This will be done according to section 6.2.4 Identification of 
the subject.   
▪ 
Assignment to the treatment group: Refers to determining the treatment that the patient 
will follow during the study. It will be done according to section 7. Methods. Assignment of 
the intervention. This assignment will be made at the baseline visit. 
▪ 
Delivery of medication: Refers to the delivery of the medication to the study patient, by the 
research center. It will be done according to sections 6.3.1 Managed treatments and 6.3.4.1 
Delivery and reception. After each medication delivery, a training or re-training of the 
application of the study medication will be carried out. 
▪ 
Biomicroscopy: see 6.4.3.1 Biomicroscopy 
▪ 
Visual capacity: see 6.4.3.2 Visual capacity 
▪ 
History of symptomatology: see 6.4.3.4 History of symptomatology 
▪ 
OCT: see 6.4.3.5 Optical coherence tomography. For this visit, the OCT can be done in a 
window period of 48 hours. 
▪ 
Tonometry: see 6.4.3.6 Tonometry   
 
▪ 
Evaluation of concomitant medications: refers to the interrogation performed by the IP of 
the medications the patient uses, before, during and after the study. They must be 
registered in the corresponding section in the CRF, including name of active substance, 
posology and duration. See: 6.3.3 Treatments and concomitant interventions allowed and 
prohibited before and during the study. 
▪ 
Evaluation of adverse events: see 6.4.3.3 Evaluation of adverse events 
▪ 
Subject's daily delivery: refers to the delivery by the IP, of the subject's daily instrument, to 
the subject. 
6.5.2.2 Visit 1.  
▪ 
Comprehensive ophthalmologic exploration: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit. 
▪ 
Biomicroscopy: see 6.4.3.1 Biomicroscopy 
▪ 
Visual capacity: see 6.4.3.2 Visual capacity 
▪ 
History of symptomatology: see 6.4.3.4 History of symptomatology 
▪ 
Tonometry: see 6.4.3.6 Tonometry 
▪ 
Evaluation of concomitant medications: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit. 
▪ 
Evaluation of adverse events: see 6.4.3.3 Evaluation of adverse events 
▪ 
Continuity assessment: refers to the determination by the IP and desire of the subject to 
continue with their participation in the study. 
▪ 
Adherence evaluation: refers to the review of the subject's diary to evaluate the drug 
application registry. 
6.5.2.3 Visit 2. 
▪ 
Comprehensive ophthalmologic exploration: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit. 
▪ 
Biomicroscopy: see 6.4.3.1 Biomicroscopy 
▪ 
Visual capacity: see 6.4.3.2 Visual capacity 
▪ 
History of symptomatology: see 6.4.3.4 History of symptomatology 
▪ 
Tonometry: see 6.4.3.6 Tonometry 
▪ 
Evaluation of concomitant medications: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit. 
▪ 
Evaluation of adverse events: see 6.4.3.3 Evaluation of adverse events 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 39 of 65 
 
▪ 
Continuity assessment: see 6.5.2.2 Visit 1 
▪ 
Adherence evaluation: see 6.5.2.2 Visit 1 
▪ 
Delivery of the subject's diary: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit, this visit is made upon delivery of 
the diary of the subject delivered at the baseline visit. 
▪ 
Indication to change to dose reduction scheme: It refers to the indication of the IP to initiate 
the dose reduction scheme on day 15 of the study, and to last the remaining 14 days of the 
intervention. The IP will determine, according to the patient's clinical condition, the scheme 
to follow. It will record in the clinical note and in the CRF, the outline and total number of 
applications indicated. Example: 1 drop 3 times a day for 5 days; followed by 1 drop 2 times 
a day for 5 days; finish with 1 drop a day for 4 days; and suspend (Total number of 
applications indicated: 29). In case visit 2 is made on day 15 that same day, the scheme must 
be readjusted; if the visit is made on day 16 the scheme will be adjusted from that day and 
for the remaining 12 days. 
6.5.2.4 Final Visit. 
▪ 
Pregnancy test: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit. 
▪ 
Ophthalmological examination: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit. 
▪ 
Biomicroscopy: see 6.4.3.1 Biomicroscopy 
▪ 
Visual capacity: see 6.4.3.2 Visual capacity 
▪ 
History of symptomatology: see 6.4.3.4 History of symptomatology 
▪ 
OCT: see 6.4.3.5 Optical coherence tomography 
▪ 
Tonometry: see 6.4.3.6 Tonometry 
▪ 
Evaluation of concomitant medications: see 6.5.2.1 Baseline visit. 
▪ 
Evaluation of adverse events: see 6.4.3.3 Evaluation of adverse events 
▪ 
Continuity assessment: see 6.5.2.2 Visit 1 
▪ 
Adherence evaluation: see 6.5.2.2 Visit 1 
▪ 
Return of the medication: refers to the delivery, by the subject, of the excess medication to 
the research center. 
6.5.2.5 Security call: 
▪ 
Evaluation of adverse events: see 6.4.3.3 Evaluation of adverse events. 
6.5.3 Diagram of the study 
 
Basal 
(Day 1) 
Visit 1 
(Day 7) 
Visit 2 
(Day 14) 
Change to 
dose 
reduction 
Final 
visit 
(Day 29) 
Security Call (Day 43) 
Period of treatment in the study groups: 
- 
 PRO-145 
- 
 Prednisolone Acetate 1% 
 (28 days) 
P. 
Security 
(15 days) 
(Day 28)            
End application 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 40 of 65 
 
Figure 4. Diagram of the study 
6.6 Sample size. 
The sample size calculated for the present study is 178 subjects. 
Divided into two intervention groups, each group will be comprised of 89 subjects. Each subject will 
provide an eye for efficacy analysis. 
6.6.1 Calculation of the sample size. 
The sample sample size was calculated using the formula for two proportions variables as well as 
the 
data 
was 
entered 
into 
the 
online 
calculator, 
software 
developed 
in: 
www.powerandsamplesize.com based on Chow S et al. [72] 
With a statistical confidence of 95% corresponding to the type I error, equal to 1.96, with a power 
of 80%, corresponding to the type II error, equal to 0.84. A 78.9% efficiency ratio was considered 
in the reduction of the degree of cells in the anterior chamber after the application of 4 weeks of 
difluprednate 0.05% in 79 subjects submitted to phacoemulsification compared to an efficiency 
ratio of 77.5% with the use of 1% prednisolone. [53] 
According to the previous calculation, the result is 74 eyes per group. The total when considering 2 
intervention groups is 148 eyes, which was increased by 20% (30 eyes) for the probable losses. The 
total sample size required is 178 eyes.   Total n = 178 eyes. 
6.7 Recruitment  
The subjects will be recruited from the outpatient IP consultation and who have met the criteria for 
cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. The IP may include subjects who are not operated on their 
own, as long as the surgeon responsible for the surgery hands over the postoperative management 
to the IP and its equipment.   
 
7. Methods Assignment of the intervention 
7.1 Generation of the allocation sequence. 
2 strata corresponding to the intervention groups will be used, which will be balanced for each 
research center. The allocation will be 1: 1. The generation will be done through an electronic system 
validated by an external provider, previously evaluated and authorized by Sophia Laboratories S.A. 
of C.V. The information corresponding to this provider will be found in the master folder of the 
study. 
7.2 Blinding mechanism 
Blinding will be performed by the personnel indicated by the Clinical Operations Management of 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. The vials of both interventions will be re-labeled and the secondary 
packaging will be masked. 
7.3 Implementation 
The sequence will be generated by means of an electronic randomisation system. Said system will 
be hired by Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. to a third party. The information corresponding to this 
third party will be found in the master folder of the study. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 41 of 65 
 
7.4 Blinding and masking 
The blinding will correspond to the research subject and the principal investigator. In addition, the 
statistical analysis will be carried out in a blinded manner in the case of a partial and final analysis. 
The masking will be carried out using boxes in the identical primary packaging in the two groups and 
re-labeling the bottles of both interventions. 
Blinding for the research subject and the researcher will be done by replacing the commercial labels 
in the case of the comparator in the bottles and the use of identical labels that contain the 
assignment number. 
7.4.1 Opening of blinding 
Blinding may be opened in the following cases: 
1. Presence of a serious adverse event. 
2. Safety alarm due to the use of the drugs under study. 
3. In case the sponsor determines it for any reason of security or another reason that considers 
pertinent. 
 
8. Methods Collection, administration and data analysis 
8.1 Methods of data collection 
A clinical monitor will be assigned to each research center, which will be authorized to monitor, 
review, procure and ensure that the quality of the information obtained from the participants is 
reliable and trustworthy. Each monitor will schedule periodic visits to the research centers in order 
to review the source documents and corroborate the information captured in the CRF. All clinical 
monitors will be trained in relation to the information of the study protocol (objective, visits, 
procedures, range of accepted values, etc.). In the event that the data are not identical between the 
two registers, the clinical monitor will generate a discrepancy, which must be resolved by the 
research center in time that the sponsor deems reasonable to meet the objectives of the clinical 
study. The correction of the discrepancies will be made according to the Good Documentation 
Practices.  
The data registered in the CRF will be reviewed by personnel of Sophia Laboratories, trained in the 
ophthalmological, clinical and pharmacological area, which will be able to generate discrepancies in 
the event that the data do not comply with the stipulations of the research protocol or put the 
participants at risk. 
Once all discrepancies generated by the team of clinical monitors and clinical staff have been 
resolved, the data will be downloaded into an electronic database (Excel Sheet) by personnel 
designated by the sponsor. A new review of the data will be carried out to corroborate the fidelity 
of the same and new discrepancies may be generated in case it was considered. 
The database generated will be safeguarded by the sponsor and will only have personal access 
designated by the same. 
8.1.1 Strategies to complete the follow-up 
• 
You will be informed in a clear way the importance of the study and the benefits that the 
population will obtain from the results of the study. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 42 of 65 
 
• 
Transportation assistance will be provided in order for the participant to attend their visits. 
• 
A printed calendar will be provided with the objective of reminding the participant of their 
appointments and the activities that will be carried out, in addition to the estimated 
duration of the same. 
• 
In case the participant does not attend his / her appointment, the research center must 
make a call to know the reason and try to arrange a new appointment within the established 
window period or an unscheduled appointment. 
• 
In case it is not possible to make an appointment, it will be asked about the presence of 
adverse events and the reason for leaving the study, as minimum data. 
8.2 Data management 
The subject's medical record (including clinical notes, test results, etc.), as well as the subject's diary, 
are considered source data. 
The IP or the designated person of your team will fill out the Case Report Format (CRF) as well as all 
other documents provided by the sponsor (for example: documents related to the management of 
the treatment). 
An electronic CRF was designed to record the data that are required in the protocol and that the 
researcher collects in each of the visits.  
In the case of self-assessment questionnaires, it is not permissible for the principal investigator or 
person responsible for filling in to modify what was written by the subject of the study. 
The data capture in the research site will be done by the researcher or the designated person of his 
team after performing the Medical File. The researcher or a designated person of your team will be 
trained in filling the CRF. 
All corrections to the CRF data should be made by the investigator or the designated person of your 
team in accordance with the instructions provided. 
To ensure the confidentiality and security of the data, user names and access codes will be used to 
restrict access to the system only to authorized personnel. 
The monitor must ensure that all the data has been filled in the CRF. After comparing the data 
against the source documents, the monitor will ask the researcher to make the necessary correction 
/ clarification, so that they are answered and closed as quickly as possible. 
The Scientific Committee of Laboratories Sophia S.A. of C.V. will give the latest medical-scientific 
review, and will set the standard for freezing the database. 
8.3 Statistical methodology 
8.3.1 Analysis of primary and secondary outcome variables 
The statistical analysis will be carried out by personnel of Sophia Laboratories. The statistical 
program SPSS version 19 will be used. 
The designated personnel will be blinded to the intervention groups. The coding will be done using 
consecutive numbers for each intervention group. 
The data will be collected and sorted in an excel sheet. Later they will be exported to the platform 
of the SPSS program. The variables will be categorized according to their nature. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 43 of 65 
 
The results of the continuous quantitative variables will be presented in measures of central 
tendency: mean, standard deviation and ranges. See Table 5 Variable measurement method. The 
total size of the samples will consider an eye as a case for the evaluation of the efficacy.  
The normal distribution of results will be obtained through the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-
Wilks test, as applicable. 
The statistical analysis of the continuous quantitative variables to find significant differences (p) will 
be the following:  
. Inter-group analysis: t test for paired samples. 
. Intra-group analysis: Mc Nemar test. Cellularity assessments in the anterior chamber will be 
considered for the analysis before the application of the intervention and in the final visit. The level 
of difference to consider significance will be of an alpha of 0.05 or less.  
The result of nominal and ordinal qualitative variables will be presented in frequencies, proportions 
and percentages. See Table 5 Method for measuring variables 
The statistical analysis to identify significant differences of the qualitative variables will be done by 
creating 2x2 contingency tables and will be done as follows:  
 
• Difference between groups: χ2 test (Chi-square) of Pearson or Fisher's exact in expected values 
less than 5. 
• Intra-group analysis: Mc Nemar test. 
The level of difference to consider significance will be an alpha of 0.05 or less. 
For the reporting of adverse events all eyes of those participants who were randomly assigned to 
an intervention group will be considered. The results will be expressed in number of cases. 
The final report of the results will be shown in tables or graphs, as appropriate. 
8.3.2 Additional analyzes 
An internal analysis will be made to know the changes that occur between each visit. It is the 
sponsor's prerogative to request an additional analysis of the data, during the conduction of the 
study or at the end of this.  
8.3.3 Population analysis and management of missing data 
The effectiveness analysis will consider those cases in which the measurements of the baseline and 
final visit are met. Those subjects who do not comply with any of these measurements will not be 
integrated into the final database to evaluate the effectiveness. Nevertheless, an intention to treat 
analysis (ITT) will be carried out. 
The safety assessment will include in the analysis all those subjects (considering one eye or both) 
who have been exposed at least once to any of the interventions regardless of the visit in which they 
were eliminated from the study. 
 
9. Methods Monitoring 
9.1 Data monitoring 
Monitoring visits by a site monitor from Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. are intended to confirm 
that the studies sponsored by Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. they are conducted in accordance 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 44 of 65 
 
with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent 
with Good Clinical Practices and with the applicable regulatory requirements (verifying a continuous 
compliance with the protocol, amendment or amendments, reviewing accounting records of the 
product under investigation, verifying that the personnel of the site and the facilities remain 
adequate to carry out the study). 
The researcher must ensure that they have sufficient time, space and qualified personnel for the 
monitoring visits. 
In order to carry out the monitoring review, it is mandatory to provide direct access to all source 
data and those related to the study site. The monitor will conduct a review of the CRF and a 
Verification of Source Documents (VDF). By VDF means the verification of the records in the CRF 
through its comparison with the source data that the researcher will make available for this purpose. 
 
Regarding the CRF, the monitor will mark the screens completed and approved at each visit. 
In accordance with the applicable regulations, Good Clinical Practices, and the procedures of Sophia 
Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. The monitors of Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. they will contact the site 
before the start of the study to review the protocol, the regulatory and ethical requirements of 
Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. of C. V. with the staff of the site. When reviewing the procedures for data 
collection, the conversation will also include the identification, agreement and documentation of 
the individual data for which the records in the CRF serve as source documents. 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. monitor the study to verify, among other things, that: 
• 
The data is authentic, correct and complete. 
• 
They are protecting the security and rights of the subjects. 
• 
The study is being carried out in accordance with the currently approved protocol, any other 
study agreement, Good Clinical Practices and all applicable regulatory requirements. 
The investigator and the head of the medical institution (when applicable) agree to allow the 
monitor to have direct access to all relevant documents. 
Study monitoring visits will be conducted at regular intervals, depending on the recruitment rate, 
under the arrangements between the investigator and the sponsor. All information related to these 
visits will be handled as strictly confidential. 
Upon completing or discontinuing the study prematurely, the monitor will carry out site closure 
activities with the investigator or site staff, as appropriate, in accordance with applicable 
regulations, Good Clinical Practices, and Sophia Laboratories S.A. of C.V. procedures. 
After the study is closed, the researcher must keep all study records on the site in a safe place. 
Records should be maintained to allow easy and timely recovery, when necessary (for example, in 
an audit or inspection). Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. will inform the investigator / institution the 
period of time they will have to retain these records, in order to comply with all applicable regulatory 
requirements. Nevertheless, the investigator / institution must seek the written approval of the 
sponsor before proceeding to the elimination of these records. The minimum retention time will 
satisfy the most stringent standard applicable to that site for the study, in accordance with the 
provisions of the PCBs, any institutional requirements or the applicable laws or regulations, or the 
standards / procedures of Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.  

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 45 of 65 
 
The researcher / institution must notify Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. of any change in file 
arrangements including, without limitation, the following: file in an off-site facility, ownership 
transfer of records in the event the investigator leaves the site. 
9.2 Preliminary analysis and early termination of the study 
The partial analysis will allow the sponsor to make a decision about the early termination of the 
study in the event that the safety of the participants is compromised. 
The early termination of the study will be considered in the following cases: 
1. Presence of serious adverse events in more than 5% of the participants in each intervention 
group. 
2. The competent authority considers it for security alerts. 
3. The Sponsor determined it for your convenience or eventualities such as: economic support, 
manufacturing errors, etc. 
4. Lack of recruitment as expected.  
In case the decision is the early termination of the clinical study, all the research centers will be 
informed within the first 24 hours by the available communication channels. Likewise, the 
corresponding authority in each country will be informed (if applicable) and the Ethics Committees 
involved.  
Each research center has the obligation to inform the subjects that participate in the clinical study 
in a period no longer than 24 hours, after receiving the information from the sponsor. You must 
inform all the subjects involved in any phase of the study. 
The result of the preliminary evaluation will be in charge of the Clinical Operations Management 
and the Medical Management of Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., which will have the faculty to 
determine the fate of the present protocol, as they deem convenient. 
9.3 Adverse events 
9.3.1 Investigator's responsibilities 
Perform the verification of adverse events through questioning, relevant physical examination, 
assessment of evolution, as well as adequate medical and pharmacological management, resolution 
or outcome and final discharge following the definitions determined in national and international 
regulations. [73] [74] [75] 
In case of adverse events or any event that puts the health and well-being of the patients at risk, 
appropriate medical attention will be provided, either at the research site or will be referred to the 
Hospital Center with greater resolving power with which the research site and / or researcher have 
medical care agreement. The researcher will notify the clinical monitor of the sponsor, according to 
the times established in the national and international regulations. In the case of serious adverse 
events, notify the sponsor and record the corresponding information in the case report form and in 
turn inform the Research Ethics Committee, the Research Committee.  
The attention of the adverse events will be made according to the diagram of attention of the event 
(see Figure 5. Attention of the adverse event) 
In the final report to be drafted by the Scientific Committee of the Department of Clinical Operations 
of Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., will include the report of adverse events in compliance with 
current national and international regulations. [73] [74] 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 46 of 65 
 
9.3.1.1 Record of adverse events in the Case Report Form 
The registry of adverse events considers the information concerning the identification data of the 
participating patient as code, age, sex, left eye, right eye. 
Information about the type of adverse event, adverse reaction or suspected adverse reaction to the 
product under investigation or to the study medication, as appropriate. The date on which the 
adverse event occurs is reported, as well as in which the Investigator is aware of it, date of resolution 
or outcome, as applicable. The clinical diagnosis is indicated. If a lack of therapeutic response is 
detected to the investigational product and / or investigational medication, it should be reported as 
an adverse reaction. Include in concomitant medications the therapy used for the pharmacological 
management of the adverse event, suspected adverse reaction, adverse reaction. Record the 
outcome or resolution of the event: patient recovered without sequelae, with sequelae, not 
recovered. Patient who presented death due to adverse reaction / adverse event, patient who 
presented death and it is judged that the drug could have contributed, patient who presented death 
and this is not related to the investigational product or drug, or indicate that it was not knows what 
the consequence of the event is.  
Consign information about the product or drug under investigation or the drug associated with the 
adverse event, adverse reaction or suspected adverse reaction. As applicable, information 
concerning generic denomination, distinctive denomination or product code in research and / or 
investigational medication should be recorded, as appropriate according to the methodological 
design of the study, this is relevant in the case of blinded studies or those where they use placebo 
as comparators, since there are circumstances that justify opening the cecum to determine if the 
adverse event, the adverse reaction or suspected adverse reaction may be attributable to the active 
agent, the combination of active agents, or the substance (s). s) pharmacologically inert (s), such as 
vehicles or additives, as appropriate to the clinical research phase in which the development of the 
drug is located.  
It will also be necessary to record the data concerning a) batch number, b) manufacturer laboratory, 
c) expiration date, d) dosage, e) route of administration, f) start dates and g) term of administration 
and / or consumption , reason for the prescription; according to whether it is a product or 
investigational medicine (protocol in which the patient currently participates) or is a medicine that 
the subject under investigation consumes for the treatment of basic concomitant diseases or used 
for the management of any sign or transient symptom that does not correspond to the Natural 
History of the pathology that motivated its entry into the research protocol. 
Record the withdrawal or maintenance of the medication, investigational product or investigational 
medication, as appropriate. Indicate if the adverse event disappears when the investigational 
product or investigational medication or suspicious medication is removed (to provoke the event). 
Also indicate if a dose adjustment is made, if the event changes in terms of intensity or seriousness, 
persistence of the reaction. It is important to indicate that in those patients who are exposed again 
to the investigational product, investigational medication or medication, which had previously been 
suspended, if the adverse reaction or adverse event reappears.  
Regarding concomitant pharmacotherapy. Indicate the generic name, the dose, the route of 
administration, start and end dates of its use, as well as the reason for the prescription regardless if 
it is consistent with the information to prescribe or technical data sheet or is used outside the 
regulations or of what the local, national or international regulatory entity has authorized. 
Concerning the relevant clinical antecedents. The analysis of the adverse event, adverse reaction or 
suspicion of adverse reaction considers the information previously reported, notwithstanding the 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 47 of 65 
 
clinical context in which said harmful phenomenon occurs in the participants of the clinical research 
protocol, it is of special interest, so that the information about previous ailments, hypersensitivity 
or allergy phenomena, previous surgical procedures, laboratory analysis or cabinet exams that have 
been practiced on the participant, etc., that the researcher deems convenient to mention may do 
so. If you have enough space in the case report format, you can complement the information in your 
clinical note of the clinical file. 
9.3.1.2 Follow up of adverse events 
The IP will provide the attention and guidance of the EA that the participant presents until the end 
of the same, according to what is referred to the following section. 
9.3.1.3 Procedures for a serious adverse event 
The process of attention of the adverse event considers the following stages: 
 
Figure 5. Attention to the adverse event 
A. A. During the development and conduct of the present clinical research, undesirable 
damaging events or adverse reactions, of medical implication, which do not necessarily have 
a causal relationship with the investigational product or investigational medication, may 
occur in the participant patient. These harmful phenomena can occur during the use of 
investigational drugs, unintentionally, at doses authorized for use in humans; by a local, 
national or international regulatory entity, whether for prophylaxis, diagnosis, treatment or 
for the modification of some physiological process. Notwithstanding, it can be suspected 
that the investigational product or the investigational drug or the placebo cause some 
unwanted clinical manifestation. Adverse events, adverse reactions or suspected adverse 
reactions to one or several medications can occur during the systematic evaluation of the 
participants (on the days when the clinical review is scheduled, according to the schedule 
of activities) or suddenly, as such way that,  
B. The investigator must be the first person to whom the patient reports that they have 
developed or presented a harmful clinical phenomenon during their participation in this 
research protocol.  
C. According to your clinical judgment; on the basis of the pertinent physical examination, 
interrogation, etc., as well as the analysis of the information available in the medical 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 48 of 65 
 
literature and that referred to in the investigator's manual, information to prescribe or 
technical data sheet of the comparator drug, the principal investigator determines the 
relevant attention of the event / harmful reaction; either:  
D. In the research site or in the hospital with the greatest resolving power (1st, 2nd or 3rd level 
of medical attention). In such a way that, in case the patient is sent by the Investigator to a 
hospital, he / she attends by means of a reference system, it can be with an identification 
card that the patient belongs to the present investigation and there is an official number or 
folio, which pertains to the emergency care agreement with the health institution with the 
greatest resolving power, or a medical reference note issued by the principal investigator, 
so that appropriate care is given to the participating patient. It should be noted that the 
Study Sponsor, Sophia Laboratories, SA of C.V., will pay the expenses for the medical care 
of the participating patient, only if the adverse event, adverse reaction or suspected adverse 
reaction to medication is associated or found in relation to the investigational product or 
investigational drug. 
E. Taking the clinical information collected, either during the care provided at the research site 
or provided by the treating physician (s) in the hospital, the principal investigator records 
the adverse event, suspected reaction adverse or adverse reaction to medication in your 
clinical note of the clinical record, indicating the seriousness, intensity (mild, moderate or 
severe), relationship with the product or drug under investigation, as well as: 
F. The migration of the relevant data to the case report format and to its respective adverse 
event section; noting the pertinent information, already referred to in section 9.3.1.1., this 
in virtue of the fact that in cases of serious adverse events, which must be notified in less 
than 24 hours after the moment in which the principal investigator has knowledge of the 
same, the clinical monitor of the study is informed, so that in turn he / she informs the 
Scientific Committee and the Pharmacovigilance Department of the sponsor and later he / 
she informs the Research Ethics Committee. Regarding non-serious adverse events, these 
will be recorded and adequately addressed and the corresponding regulatory entity will be 
informed about the safety profile of the product under investigation or investigational 
medication in the final report of the clinical trial. 
The record of the outcome of the adverse event, suspicion of adverse reaction or adverse reaction 
to medication depends substantially on the follow-up that the principal investigator makes to the 
participant, since most of the harmful phenomena are expected, consult section of the safety profile 
in number 5.3 and in the researcher's manual, they are ophthalmic in nature, nevertheless there 
may be systemic alterations. Therefore, in the opinion of the researcher, the withdrawal of the 
participant or his / her permanence will be considered, according to the stipulations of section 6.2.3 
Elimination criteria of this research protocol. 
9.3.1.4 Causality evaluation 
The assessment of the causality, the methodology used to estimate the probability of attributing to 
a drug, investigational drug or investigational product the adverse reaction, the suspicion of the 
same or the observed adverse event, considers probabilistic categories, according to the evidence 
available and the quality of information, based on national pharmacovigilance regulations. [73] As 
a tool to facilitate the probabilistic categorization of causality, the principal investigator can use the 
algorithm of Karch and Lasagna modified by Naranjo referred to by Aramendi I, 2011 in which 
different items are qualified which allow assigning a value to the relationship cause-effect between 
the administration of the drug and the adverse reaction. [76]  
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 49 of 65 
 
 
 
Table 8. Algorithm of Karch and Lasagna modified by Naranjo 
No. 
Reagent 
Yes / No 
1. 
There are previous conclusive reports about the adverse drug reaction, adverse event 
or suspected adverse drug reaction 
+1 
0 
2. 
The adverse event appeared when the suspected drug was administered 
+2 
-1 
3. 
Adverse reaction to medication, adverse event or suspected adverse drug reaction 
improved upon discontinuation or administration of a specific antagonist 
+1 
0 
4. 
Adverse reaction to medication / adverse event / suspected adverse drug reaction 
reappeared when administering the drug / investigational product / investigational 
medication 
+2 
-1 
5. 
There are alternative causes that may cause this reaction 
-1 
+2 
6. 
Adverse reaction / adverse event / suspected adverse drug reaction occurred after 
placebo administration 
-1 
+1 
7. 
The drug was determined in blood or other liquids in toxic concentrations 
+1 
0 
8. 
The intensity of the adverse reaction / adverse event / suspected adverse drug reaction 
was higher with higher doses or lower with lower doses 
+1 
0 
9. 
The patient has had similar reactions with the drug / product under investigation or 
investigational medication, in the past 
+1 
0 
10. 
Adverse reaction / adverse event / suspected adverse reaction to medication was 
confirmed with some objective evidence 
+1 
0 
                                                                                                                               Total score 
summation 
Probabilistic category based on the score obtained 
I 
The causal relationship is checked 
≥,9  
II 
It is likely that ADR is due to the drug or product under investigation 
5 a 8 
III 
It is possible that the RAM is due to the drug or product under investigation 
1 a 4 
IV 
The causal relationship is doubtful 
0 
The reagents considered by the algorithm of Karch and Lasagna modified by Naranjo where each one receives a defined 
score are shown and the final summation allows estimating the probabilistic category of the cause-effect relationship 
between the administration of the drug / product in research / investigational medicine and the adverse reaction, 
adverse event or suspected adverse reaction. Consider that if the information is not available, a score equal to zero is 
recorded.  
In such a way that the degree of certainty to establish the investigational product or investigational 
medication (as appropriate) as the causal agent of the harmful phenomenon that befalls the 
participating patient, can be directly indicated by the principal investigator based on his or her 
clinical experience or well through the voluntary application of the tool mentioned previously. 
Notwithstanding, it is important that the researcher take into account the following arguments in 
favor of the causal relationship: the strength of association that refers to the number of cases in 
relation to those exposed. The consistency of the data, ie the presence of a common characteristic 
or pattern. The exposure-effect pattern: which determines the relationship with the site of onset, 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 50 of 65 
 
time, dose and reversibility after suppression. The biological plausibility: that refers to the possible 
pharmacological or physiopathological mechanisms involved in the development or presentation of 
the adverse event. Experimental findings: for example the appearance of anomalous metabolites or 
high levels of drug or the product of its biotransformation. Analogy: experience acquired with other 
related drugs, adverse reactions frequently produced by the same family of pharmacological agents. 
Nature and characteristics of the data: objectivity, accuracy and validity of the relevant 
documentation. [77] 
9.3.2 Responsibilities of the sponsor 
The sponsor will be responsible, and will cover the expenses derived from the medical attention to 
adverse events related to the product under investigation. 
9.4 Audit 
To guarantee compliance with the PCBs and with all applicable regulatory requirements, 
Laboratorios Sophia S.A. of C.V. could carry out a quality assurance audit. Regulatory agencies could 
also carry out a regulatory inspection of this study.  
9.4.1 Pre-study audit 
The research centers included in the study will be subject to a feasibility visit prior to the selection 
of the center, where it will be verified that they meet the minimum requirements indicated by the 
sponsor.  
9.4.2 Audit / Inspection during the conduction of the study 
They may take place at any time before, during or after the conclusion of the study. If an audit or 
inspection is performed, the investigator and the institution should agree to allow the auditor / 
inspector direct access to all relevant documents, and will allocate their time and that of their staff 
to the auditor / inspector to discuss the findings and any relevant problems. 
 
10. Ethical considerations 
10.1 Approval of the committees 
The present study will be conducted according to the standards of the Declaration of Helsinki, World 
Medical Association 2013. Nuremberg Code; Nuremberg Trial by the International Court of 
Nuremberg, 1947. Belmont Report, National Commission for the Protection of Subjects of 
Biomedical Research and Conduct, 1979. 
It will be conducted in accordance with the scientific and technical requirements necessary for the 
registration of medicines for human use of the International Conference on Harmonization (The 
International Council for Harmonization, ICH for its acronym in English) Guide to Good Clinical 
Practices. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research in Human Beings of the Council 
for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (Council for International Organizations of 
Medical Sciences, CIOMS, 2002). International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies of the 
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (Council for International Organizations 
of Medical Sciences, CIOMS, 2008).  
The Research Ethics Committee and the Research Committee will evaluate the protocol before 
conducting the study and will issue their approval or possible modifications for its realization, these 
Committees should be notified of any significant changes to the protocol. In addition to the above, 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 51 of 65 
 
the current regulations issued by the Ministry of Health will also be complied with. General Health 
Law, NOM 012 Official Mexican Standard NOM-012-SSA3-2012, which establishes the criteria for 
the execution of research projects for human health. The study is considered as an investigation 
with a risk greater than the minimum according to the Regulation of the General Health Law on 
Health Research, Title Two, Chapter I, Article 17, Category III, published in the Official Gazette on 6 
January 1987. 
The principal investigators or study coordinators or personnel authorized by the sponsor will be 
evaluated by the Research Ethics Committees, Research Committees, and when applying to the 
Biosafety Committee the essential documentation of the research project: research protocol, letter 
of informed consent, researcher's manual, subject's diary, as well as those requested, in addition, 
according to local, national or international requirements applicable by regulatory entities. 
The study will not start in the research site if you do not have the confidentiality agreements and 
economic proposal of each of the principal investigators, duly signed and without having previously 
obtained the favorable opinion and / or the approval of the Committees of Ethics in Research, 
Research Committees, and when applicable by the Biosecurity Committee, corresponding. 
The study will not begin without having met the relevant local, national or international regulatory 
requirements and without having the corresponding health authorization. 
10.2 Amendments to the protocol 
The amendment procedure will be pertinent when there is a need to make any change to a 
document that is part of the research project or protocol, derived from variations in the 
methodological structure that affects driving and results, substitution of the principal investigator 
or identification of risks in the research subjects. The documents susceptible of amendment will be: 
protocol, letter of informed consent, researcher's manual, documents for the patient, scales of 
measurement and schedule of activities. 
Any amendment must be approved by the sponsor and / or the principal investigator, the amended 
document (s), once reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee and the Research 
Committee or when applicable, by the Committee of Inquiry. Biosafety, (entities that issued the 
initial favorable opinion for the conduct of the investigation) will be sent (s) for authorization by the 
relevant regulatory entity.  
Amendments that substantially modify the protocol or confer an additional or different risk to the 
research subjects must be approved by the Committee. It is the investigator's responsibility to take 
action in situations that require immediate action to avoid unnecessary harm to the study 
participants. 
The principal investigator has the responsibility to inform the Research Ethics Committee of any 
amendment to the protocol that could eventually affect the rights, safety or welfare of the research 
participants. Likewise, he must know any situation or new knowledge that shows a greater risk for 
the participants, the termination or premature suspension of the study, the reasons and the results 
obtained up to that moment. You must also inform about the conclusion of the study, when 
completing the research protocol. 
The list of amendments, and in the necessary cases, the relation of the issuance of errata, will be 
referred to in the final report of the investigation. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 52 of 65 
 
10.3 Consent 
10.3.1 Obtaining 
The informed consent must be obtained before the subject undergoes any procedure indicated in 
the protocol. 
The written consent documents will incorporate the elements of informed consent described in the 
Declaration of Helsinki and the ICH Guide to Good Clinical Practices and will be in compliance with 
all applicable laws and regulations. 
The IP will provide the potential participant with all the information regarding the characteristics of 
the study, its potential benefits, risks, objectives and procedures thereof. 
This information will be with a language understandable to the subject, it will be explained to the 
subject that has the right to interrupt their participation in the study at any stage, without affecting 
the relationship with the researcher and / or their future assistance. The informed consent will be 
put to the consideration of the possible participant; This must have enough time to analyze each 
and every one of the aspects mentioned above and if there is any doubt this will be clarified by the 
person in charge of obtaining the informed consent. Once the participant agrees to participate in 
the study, he / she must sign and date the informed consent letter in the presence of two witnesses 
who have or are not related to the subject of study, who will participate during the informed consent 
process and will sign endorse that the process was carried out prior to any study procedure, that 
the information of the study was clearly explained and doubts were clarified in case of existing. 
If a subject is illiterate, the acceptance will be with their fingerprint, and in the event that the subject 
is not able to grant an informed written consent, a representative of the "legally authorized" subject 
can provide such consent the subject in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 
The IP must also sign and date this consent. 
 
The informed consent must be signed in duplicate by all involved, and two witnesses, one copy will 
be filed in the file of the subject and the other will be delivered to the participant. The IP must 
document in the patient's medical history, the date on which he signed the informed consent. 
10.3.2 Special considerations 
 
The auxiliary studies that will be conducted during the conduct of the study are not invasive and do 
not pose an additional risk that should be considered apart from the procedures listed in the 
informed consent.  
10.3.3 Modification to informed consent 
 
Any change to "informed consent" constitutes an amendment to this document and must be 
submitted for approval to the Research Ethics Committees, and if applicable before the Competent 
Authorities. 
The amendment will include a copy of the new version in the language or languages of the country. 
Such amendments may be implemented only after having obtained the written approval of the 
corresponding committees and the Regulatory Entity (as applicable), with the exception of an 
amendment that is required to eliminate an immediate danger for the subjects of the study. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 53 of 65 
 
 
Each subject affected by the amendment must complete, date and sign two originals of the new 
version. The subject will be given a signed original of the amendment and the researcher will keep 
the second original. 
10.4 Confidentiality  
All documents and information provided to the researcher by the sponsor are strictly confidential. 
The researcher expressly agrees that the data on their professional and clinical experience, provided 
to the sponsor on paper and stored electronically or digitally, are only for use related to their 
activities with the sponsor of clinical studies, in accordance with Good Clinical Practices. The 
researcher accepts that he / she and the members of his team will use the information only within 
the framework of this study, to carry out the protocol. This agreement is mandatory as long as the 
confidential information has not been disclosed to the public by the sponsor. The protocol of the 
clinical study provided to the researcher may be used by him and by his colleagues to obtain the 
informed consent of the subjects for the study. The clinical trial protocol, like any information taken 
from it, should not be disclosed to other parties without the written authorization of the sponsor.  
The researcher will not reveal any information without the prior written consent of Sophia 
Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., except to the representatives of the Competent Authorities, and only by 
request of the same. In the latter case, the researcher undertakes to inform Sophia Laboratories 
S.A. of C.V. before revealing the information to these authorities. The researcher will fill out and 
maintain a record of the subjects' selection, as well as the identification and enrollment list of each 
of the subjects participating in the study. The researcher agrees to give on-site access to the auditor 
and / or the representatives of the Competent Authorities. The information will be treated in 
compliance with professional secrecy. 
10.5 Deviations 
A deviation is any alteration in the procedures and activities described in the research protocol 
approved by the committees and regulatory authorities. They may be the product of modifications 
or omissions, which may compromise the safety of the participants or the quality of the data 
generated.   
- 
Major deviation / violation: is one that impacts one or more of the following aspects: 
- 
Subject security 
- 
Alteration of the risk-benefit balance 
- 
Commit the integrity of the study data 
- 
It affects the voluntariness of the subject in the participation of the study. 
 
The list of examples cited below serves the purpose of guidance, but does not cover all possible 
cases, so it is not limiting: 
 
I. 
In relation to informed consent: 1) that informed consent has been taken by an 
unauthorized person to do so, 2) that the subject under investigation signs a version of 
informed consent not approved by the committees and regulatory entity, 3) that perform a 
study procedure prior to signing the informed consent. 
II. 
Regarding the inclusion / exclusion criteria: 1) enroll subjects who do not meet all the 
inclusion criteria and / or meet any exclusion criteria, 2) enroll defined subjects as part of 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 54 of 65 
 
the so-called vulnerable population: children, pregnant women, prisoners, without prior 
approval for such group; 3) Enroll patients before the start or after the end of the study. 
III. 
In relation to the medication of the study: error in the delivery or dosage of the same. 
IV. 
In relation to concomitant medication: use of prohibited medication. 
V. 
Regarding the study procedures: that those who, in the opinion of the principal 
investigator, compromise the safety of the research subject are not carried out. 
VI. 
In relation to the reporting of serious adverse events: those that are reported outside the 
time stipulated by the committees. 
Minor deviation: is that which does not impact on the safety of the subject, does not alter the risk-
benefit balance, does not compromise the integrity of the study data or does not affect the subject's 
willingness to participate in the study. 
The list of examples cited below serves the purpose of guidance, but does not cover all possible 
cases, so it is not limiting: 
I. 
I forget about taking the study medication. 
II. 
Lack of return of study medication by the subject. 
III. 
Visits of the research subject carried out outside the window. 
10.5.1 Management of deviations 
All deviations must be reported by the IP to the sponsor and the corresponding committees. 
At your discretion, and depending on the severity of the deviation, the sponsor and the 
corresponding committees may: 
- 
Request more information 
- 
Quote the principal investigator and / or the members of your team. 
- 
Temporarily suspend the researcher for present and / or future investigations until the 
situation is resolved and / or consider the explanations given by the person (s) responsible 
for the deviation satisfactory. 
Conduct an audit for cause. 
10.6 Declaration of interests 
The researchers who collaborate in the present study (principal investigator, subinvestigator) 
commit themselves to carry out, prior to the beginning of the study, a statement of financial 
interests, as well as conflict of interest. 
10.7 Access to information 
The final database of the study will be owned by Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. and your access 
will be restricted. The IP will not have access to it, unless it has prior written authorization from the 
sponsor. 
10.8 Auxiliary care and after the end of the study 
The care of the EAs will be done according to section 9.3 Adverse events. 
 
10.9 Biosecurity aspects 
WITHOUT BIOSECURITY IMPLICATIONS 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 55 of 65 
 
The present protocol, titled: "Clinical study of the efficacy of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 for 
the management of inflammation and pain, after phacoemulsification compared to prednisolone 
acetate 1%". and number: SOPH145-0716 / III DOES NOT HAVE BIOSECURITY IMPLICATIONS, since 
infectious-contagious biological material will NOT be used; pathogenic strains of bacteria or 
parasites; viruses of any kind; radioactive material of any kind; genetically modified animals and / 
or cells and / or plants; toxic, dangerous or explosive substances; any other material that endangers 
the health or physical integrity of the personnel of the research center or the subjects of 
investigation or affects the environment. In addition, it is stated that cell, tissue or organ transplant 
procedures or cell therapy procedures will not be carried out in this project, nor will laboratory, 
farm or wildlife animals be used. 
10.10  Final report and publication of results 
10.10.1 Final report 
Once the statistical analysis is finished, a final report will be drafted with the results obtained, in 
charge of the Scientific Committee of the Department of Clinical Operations of Sophia Laboratories, 
S.A. of C.V. Said report will be prepared following the recommendations of the E3 Step 4 Guide of 
the ICH. 
10.10.2 Communication of results 
Sponsor's plan to communicate the results of the study to researchers, participants and regulatory 
entities. 
Regardless of the results in the study, Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., is committed to 
communicating the final report of the study to the principal investigators and to the regulatory 
entities corresponding to the countries with participating research centers. Maintaining at all times 
the rights on the publication and dissemination of the information contained.  
10.10.3 Publication of the results 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., acting as the sponsor of the study, assumes full responsibility for 
its function and retains exclusive ownership rights over the results of the study, which may be used 
in the manner it deems appropriate. 
 
Because the study is multicentric, the first publication should be made only with data collected from 
several centers and analyzed under the responsibility of Laboratorios Sophia S.A. of C.V. The IP 
undertakes not to publish or communicate data collected only in a center or in part of the centers 
before the publication of the full results of the study, unless prior written agreement is given by 
Laboratorios Sophia S.A. of C.V. 
 
Any publication and / or communication project related to the study and / or the results obtained 
during the study or after the completion of the study will be presented to participating medical 
researchers at least 30 days in the case of a publication and 15 days in the case of a summary, before 
the scheduled date for the communication and / or presentation of a publication. He or the medical 
researchers will comment on the project within 15 days in the case of a publication and 7 days in 
the case of a summary, from the date on which the project is received. 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 56 of 65 
 
Nevertheless, in case the sponsor is in the process of submitting a patent application on the results 
of the study, the sponsor may delay its publication or communication of the results of the study 
until the date of registration. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 57 of 65 
 
 Page left intentionally blank

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 59 of 65 
 
11. References 
 
[1]  American Academy of Ophthalmology, Lens and Cataract. Basic and Clinical Science Course, 
AAO, 2015.  
[2]  National Eye Institute , "NEI," NIH, [Online]. Available: https://nei.nih.gov/eyedata/cataract. 
[Accessed 4 Julio 2016]. 
[3]  G. Brian and H. Taylor, "Cataract blindness- challenges for the 21st century," Bull World Health 
Organ, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 249-256, 2001.  
[4]  H. Limburg, F. Barria-von-Bischhoffshausen, P. Gomez and e. al, "Review of recent surveys on 
blindness and visual impairment in Latin America," Br J Ophthalmol, vol. 92, pp. 315-319, 2008. 
[5]  S. Polack, D. Yorston, A. Lopez-Ramos and e. al, "Review of recent surveys on blindness and 
visual impairment in Latin America," Br J Ophthalmol, vol. 92, pp. 315-319, 2008.  
[6]  A. Jimenez-Corona, M. Jimenez-Corona, S. Ponce-de-Leon, M. Chavez-Rodriguez and e. al, 
"Social determinants and their impact on visual impairment in southern Mexico.," Ophthalmic 
EIPdemiol, vol. 0, pp. 1-17, 2014.  
[7]  L. Chylack, J. Wolfe, D. Singer, M. Leske and e. al, "The Lens Opacities Classification System III. 
The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group," Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 831-
836, 1993.  
[8]  L. Chylack, M. Leske, D. McCarthy, P. Khu, T. Kashiwagi and R. Sperduto, "Lens opacities 
classification system II (LOCS II)," Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 991-997, Jul 1989.  
[9]  G. Bencic, M. Zoric-Geber, D. Saric, M. Corak and Z. Mandic, "Clinical imoirtance of the lens 
opacities classification system III (LOCS III) in phacoemulsification," Coll Antropol, vol. 29, no. 
S1, pp. 91-94, 2005.  
[10] C. MCCarty, J. Keeffe and H. Taylor, "The need for cataract surgery: projections based on lens 
opacity, visual acuity, and personal concern," Br J of Ophthalmol, vol. 83, pp. 62-65, 1999.  
[11] B. Klein, R. Klein and S. Moss, "Incident cataract surgery. The Beaver Dam Eye Study," 
Ophthalmol, vol. 104, pp. 753-780, 1997.  
[12] S. Dang, "Cataract Surgery Infographic," AAO, 2014. 
[13] R. 
Lindstrom, 
"Review 
of 
Ophthalmology," 
9 
03 
2015. 
[Online]. 
Available: 
https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/thoughts-on--cataract-surgery-2015. 
[Accessed 22 07 2016]. 
[14] P. Gómez-Bastar, V. Lansingh, J. C.-S. B. Penniecook-Sawyers and e. al, "The cataract remains 
de leading cause of blindness in emerging economies, including Mexico.," Rev Mex de 
Oftalmol, vol. 88, no. 4, 2014.  

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 60 of 65 
 
[15] A. McColgin and J. Heier, "Control of intraocular inflammation associated with cataract 
surgery," Curr Opin Ophthalmol, vol. 11, pp. 3-6, 2000.  
[16] J. Mentes, T. Erakgun, F. Afrashi and G. Kerci, "Incidence of cystoid macular edema after 
uncomplicated phacoemulsification," Ophthalmologica, vol. 217, pp. 408-412, 2003.  
[17] L. Kessel, B. Tendel, K. Jorgensen, D. Erngaard and e. al, "Post-cataract prevention of 
inflammation and macular edema by steroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops," 
Ophthalmology, vol. 121, pp. 1915-1924, 2014.  
[18] S. El-Harazai and R. Feldman, "Control of intraocular inflammation associated with cataract 
surgery," Curr Opin Ophthalmol, vol. 12, pp. 4-8, 2001.  
[19] F. DeCroos and N. Afshari, "Perioperative antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents in cataract 
surgery," Curr Opin Ophthalmol, vol. 19, pp. 22-26, 2008.  
[20] M. Pande, D. Spalton, M. Kerr-Muir and J. Marshall, "Postoperative inflammatory response to 
phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract surgery: aqueous flare and cells," J Cataract 
Refract Surg, vol. 22, no. S1, pp. 770-774, 1996.  
[21] M. Raizman, E. Donnenfeld and A. Weinstein, "Clinical comparison of two topical prednisolone 
acetate 1% formulations in reducing inflammation after cataract surgery," Curr Med Res Opin, 
vol. 23, pp. 2325-2331, 2007.  
[22] H. Cho, K. Wolf and E. Wolf, "Management of ocular inflammation and pain following cataract 
surgery: focus on bromfenac ophthalmic solution," Clin Ophthalmol, vol. 3, pp. 199-210, 2009. 
[23] P. Asbell, I. Dualan, J. Mindel and e. al, "Age-related cataract," Lancet, vol. 365, pp. 599-609, 
2005.  
[24] P. Ursell, D. Spalton and K. Tilling, "Relation between postoperative blood-aqueous barrier 
damage and LOCS III cataract gradings following routine phacoemulsification surgery," Br J 
Ophtalmol, vol. 81, pp. 544-547, 1997.  
[25] H. Dua and R. Attre, "Treatment of post-operative inflammation following cataract surgery- a 
review," Eur Ophthalmic Rev, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 98-103, 2012.  
[26] J. Davison and L. Chylack, "Clinical application of the lens opacities classification system III in 
the performance of phacoelmusification," J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 138-145, 
2003.  
[27] P. Ursell, D. Spalton and K. Tilling, "Relation between postoperative blood-aqueous barrier 
damage and LOCS III cataract gradings following routine phacoemulsification surgery," Br J 
Ophthalmol, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 544-547, 1997.  
[28] American Academy of Ophthalmology, "Cataract in the Adult Eye, Preferred Practice Pattern," 
AAO, San Francisco, 2006. 
[29] The Royal College of Ophthalmologists, "Cataract surgery guidelines," Scientific Department, 
The 
Royal 
College 
of 
Ophthalmologists, 
Londo. 
Available 
at 
www.rcophth.ac.uk/documents.asp?section=39&sctionTitle=Publications&page=9, 2004. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 61 of 65 
 
[30] E. Donnenfeld, "Difluprednate for the prevention of ocular inflammation postsurgery: an 
update," Clin Ophthalmol, vol. 5, pp. 811-817, 2011.  
[31] J. Bikowski, "The position not the presence of the halogen in corticosteroids influences 
potency and side effects," J Drugs Dermatol, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 125-130, 2006.  
[32] M. Yamaguchi, S. Yasueda, A. Isowaki and e. al, "Formulation of an ophthalmic lipid emulsion 
containing an anti-inflammatory steroidal drug, difluprednate.," Int J Pharmaceutics, vol. 301, 
pp. 121-128, 2005.  
[33] A. Fujino, S. Ohtu, K. Shibarta and e. al, "Studies on the metabolic fate of difluprednate (DFBA). 
3. Metabolism in rats and rabbits after subcutaneous administration.," Pharcometrics, vol. 29, 
pp. 713-723, 1985.  
[34] T. Tajika, M. Waki, M. Tsuzuki, T. Kida and H. Sakaki, "Pharmacokinetic features of 
difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion in rabbits as determined by glucocorticoid receptor-
binding bioassay," J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 29-34, 2011.  
[35] T. Tajika, A. Isowaki and H. Sakaki, "Ocular distribution of difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 
0.05% in rabbits," J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 43-49, 2011.  
[36] T. Tajika, H. Takahashi, Y. Sakai, A. Isowaki and H. Sakaki, "Metabolic profiles of difluprednate 
in rabbit ocular tissue after instillation of difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion," Xenobiotica, 
vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 569-577, 2010.  
[37] H. Sakaki, C. Mito, S. Nemoto and e. al, Preclinical toxicity of difluprednate ophthalmic 
emulsion. The 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and 
Ophthalmology (ARVO)., Fort Lauderdale, FL: ARVO, 2007.  
[38] J. Inoue, M. Yamaguchi, H. Sakaki and e. al., Preclinical pharmacokinetics of difluprednate 
ophthalmic emulsion. The 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and 
Ophthalmology (ARVO)., Fort Lauderdale, FL: ARVO, 2007.  
[39] T. Kida, H. Takahaski, M. Tsuzuki and e. al., Difluprednate emulsion inhibits postoperative 
inflammation in rabbit paracentesis model. The 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association for 
Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)., Fort Lauderdale: ARVO, 2007.  
[40] A. Okumura, M. Tsuzuki, T. Wada and e. al., Efficacy of difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion in 
preclinical studies of uveitisThe 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision 
and Ophthalmology (ARVO). Poster B742, Program 2652. Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 6–10 May 
2007., Fort Lauderdale, FL: ARVO, 2007.  
[41] Sophia Laboratories, S.A. de CV, "Final report of the protocol: No. DIFLVSPLACPREAB14V1 
Preclinical comparative study on safety and clinical toxicity in addition to the histopathological 
changes of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 versus placebo applied on the ocular surface of 
rabbits.", Sophia Laboratories Archives, SA of C.V., Zapopan, JAL. Mexico, 2014. 
[42] Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of CV, "Comparative study of the bioavailability of the ophthalmic 
emulsion PRO-145 vs the ophthalmic emulsion of difluprednate 0.05% (Durezol®) in aqueous 
humor, cornea and conjunctiva of albino rabbits New Zealand, after the application of a topical 
dose, " Sophia Laboratories Archives, SA of C.V., Zapopan, JAL. Mexico, 2015. 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 62 of 65 
 
[43] Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., "Comparative study of the pharmacokinetics of the 
ophthalmic substance PRO-145 vs the ophthalmic suspension Sophipren ofteno® in aqueous 
humor, cornea and conjunctiva of albino rabbits New Zealand," Files of Laboratories Sophia, 
S.A. of C.V., Zapopan, JAL. Mexico, 2013. 
[44] K. Jamal and D. Callanan, "The role of difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion in clinical practice," 
Clin Ophthalmol, vol. 3, pp. 381-390, 2009.  
[45] Sophia Laboratories, S.A. de CV, "Phase I clinical study, to evaluate the safety and tolerability 
of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 (Difluprednate 0.05%) elaborated by Laboratorios 
Sophia, SA de CV versus placebo (vehicle) and similar commercial Durezol®, on the ocular 
surface , " Sophia Laboratories Archives, SA of C.V., Zapopan, JAL. Mexico., 2015. 
[46] E. Donnenfeld, E. Holland, K. Solomon, J. Fiore, A. Gobbo, J. Prince, H. Sandoval, E. Shull and 
H. Perry, "A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Fellow Eye Trial of Pulse-Dosed Difluprednate 
0.05% Versus Prednisolone Acetate 1% in Cataract Surgery," Am J Ophthalmol, vol. 152, no. 4, 
pp. 609-617, 2011.  
[47] S. Smith, D. Lorenz, J. Peace, K. McLeod, R. Crockett and R. Vogel, "Difluprednate ophthalmic 
emulsion 0.05% (Durezol®) administered two times daily for managing ocular inflammation 
and pain following cataract surgery," Clin Ophthalmol, vol. 4, pp. 983-991, 2010.  
[48] M. Ohji, Y. Tano, T. Hida and e. al, Efficacy and safety results of a phase III study of 
difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% in postoperative inflammation. The 2007 Annual 
Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), Fort Lauderdale, 
FL: ARVO, 2007, p. Poster B807. 
[49] M. Korenfeld, S. Silverstein, D. Cooke and e. al., "Difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for 
postoperative inflammation and pain.," J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 35, pp. 26-34, 2009.  
[50] S. Ohno, M. Mochizuki, M. Usui and e. al, A phase III noninferiority study of difluprednate 
ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% in the treatment of anterior uveitis. The 2007 Annual Meeting of 
the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)., Fort Lauderdale, FL: ARVO, 
2007.  
[51] M. Mochizuki, S. Ohno, M. Usui and e. al., A phase III open-label clinical study of difluprednate 
ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% in the treatment of severe refractory anterior uveitis. The 2007 
Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)., Fort 
Lauderdale, FL: ARVO, 2007.  
[52] Sirion Therapeutics, Inc., Tampa, FL, "A phase III multicenter, randomized, double-masked 
study of the safety and efficacy of difluprednate 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion compared to 
prednisolone acetate 1% ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of endogenous anterior 
uveitis," Data on file, Tampa, FL, 2008. 
[53] M. Wilson, M. O'Halloran, D. VanderVeen, J. Roarty, D. Plager, K. Markwardt, K. Gedif and S. 
Lambert, "Difluprednate versus prednisolone acetate for inflammation following cataract 
surgery in pediatric patients: a randomized safety and efficacy study," Eye, vol. Epub ahead of 
print, pp. 1-8, 2016.  

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 63 of 65 
 
[54] E. Sabaté, "Adherence to Long-Term TheraIPes: Evidence for Action," World Health 
Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. 
[55] L. Gordis, "General concepts for use of markers in clinical trials," Control Clin Trials, vol. 5, pp. 
481-487, 1984.  
[56] M. Mattson and L. Friedman, "Issues in medication adherence assessment in clinical trials of 
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute," Control Clin Trials, vol. 5, pp. 488-496, 1984.  
[57] S. Norell, "Methods in assessing drug compliance," Acta Med Scand, vol. S 683, pp. 34-50, 
1984.  
[58] P. Rudd, R. Byyny, V. Zachary and e. al, "Pill count measures of compliance in a drug trial: 
variability and suitability," Am J Hypertens, vol. 1, pp. 309-312, 1988.  
[59] K. Farmer, "Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical 
trials and clinical practice," Clin Ther, vol. 21, pp. 1074-1090, 1999.  
[60] H. Liu, C. Golin, L. Miller and e. al, "A comparison study of multiple measures of adherence to 
HIV protease inhibitors," Ann Intern Med, vol. 134, pp. 968-977, 2001.  
[61] W. Lam and P. Fresco, "Medication Adherence Measures: An Overview," BioMed Research 
International, vol. 2015, 2015.  
[62] M. Vitolins, C. Rand, S. Rapp, P. Ribisl and M. Sevick, "Measuring Adherence to Behavioral and 
Medical Interventions," Controll Clin Trial, vol. 21, pp. 188S-194S, 2000.  
[63] J. Lee, K. Grace, T. Foster, M. Crawley and e. al, "How should we measure medication 
adherence in clinical trials and practice?," Ther and Clin Risk Manag, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 685-690, 
2007.  
[64] D. Sendrowski, S. Jaanus, L. Semes and M. Stern, "Anti-inflammatory Drugs," in Clinical Ocular 
Pharmacology, St Louis, MO, Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, 2008, pp. 221-262. 
[65] T. Tozer and R. M., Introduction to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The quantitative 
basis of drug therapy, Baltimore. USA.: LipIPncott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.  
[66] R. Levine, Pharmacology. Drug actions and reactions, New York, USA: Parthenon Publishing, 
2000.  
[67] R. Fiscella, "Ophthalmic Drug Formulations," in Clinical Ocular Pharmacology, St Louis, MO, 
Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, 2008, pp. 17-37. 
[68] N. Efron, "Grading scales for contact lens complications," Ophtalmic Physiol Opt, vol. 18, pp. 
182-186, 1998.  
[69] C. O'Donell and J. Wolffsohn, "Grading of corneal transparency," Cont Lens Anterior Eye, vol. 
27, no. 4, pp. 161-70, 2004.  
[70] C. Foster and A. Vitale, Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis, Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders 
Company , 2002.  
[71] J. Kanski, Oftalmología Clínica, Barcelona: Elsevier, 2009.  

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 64 of 65 
 
[72] S. Chow, J. Shao and H. Wang, Sample size calculations in clinical research. 2nd Ed., Chapman 
& Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, 2008.  
[73] Ministry of Health Mexico, "NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-220-SSA1-2012, Installation and 
operation of pharmacovigilance.," Official Gazette, 2013.  
[74] International Conference on Harmanisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of 
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, "Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards 
for Expedited Reporting E2A," ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, vol. 4 version, 1994.  
[75] International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of 
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, "General Considerations for Clinical Trials," ICH ToIPc E8, 
1998.  
[76] I. Aramendi, L. Ardao, M. Oyarzun, M. Perez, I. Olmos and M. Frontini, "Problems related to 
medications in hospitalized patients at the Vilardebó Hospital," Rev Psiquiatr Urug, vol. 75, no. 
2, pp. 123-133, 2011.  
[77] R. Meyboom, A. Egberts, I. Edwards, Y. Hekster, F. Koning and Gribnau, "Principles of signal 
detection in pharmacovigilance.," Drug Safety, vol. 16, pp. 355-365, 1997.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PRO-145                                                                                                           Clinical Trial Protocol: SOPH145 -0716 / III 
Version: 2 
 
Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V.                           CONFIDENTIAL                                     Page 65 of 65 
 
12. Signature page 
12.1 Signatures of the sponsor's representatives 
First name: 
 
Dr. Leopoldo Martín Baiza Durán 
Firm 
Title: 
 
Medical responsible for the study 
Date 
 
First name: 
 
QFB. Francisco García Vélez 
Firm 
Title: 
 
Director of the study 
Date 
 
First name: 
 
Dr. Oscar Olvera Montaño 
Firm 
Title: 
 
Protocol author 
Date 
 
12.2 Investigator  
Researcher I agree to conduct this clinical study according to the design and guidelines of this 
protocol, abiding by the provisions of this protocol. I agree to conduct the study in accordance with 
the accepted standards of Good Clinical Practices. I agree to report all information or data in 
accordance with the provisions of the protocol, in particular, any adverse event. Also, I agree to 
handle the clinical supplies, provided by the sponsor, strictly in accordance with this protocol. I 
understand that the information that identifies me may be used by the sponsor. Because the 
information contained in this protocol and the Investigator's Manual is confidential, I understand 
that it is prohibited to share it with any third party, who is not involved in the approval, supervision 
or conduct of the study. I will make sure to take the necessary precautions to protect loss 
information, inadvertent disclosure or access by unauthorized third parties. 
First name: 
 
 
Firm 
Title: 
 
 
Date