Treatment With Psilocybin for Chronic Neuropathic Pain and Depression (TRANSCEND): An Open-Label Clinical Trial
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Treatment Resistant Depression, Chronic Pain
Sponsor: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 08-Oct-2021 
 
1 
 
 
Treatment with Psilocybin for Chronic 
Neuropathic Pain and Depression 
(TRANSCEND): An Open-Label Clinical Trial  
  
Principal Investigator: Dr. Ishrat Husain 
REB # 179-2023 
Version Number:  1.0 
Version Date: 29-April-2024 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 08-Oct-2021 
 
2 
 
Sponsor: 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal Investigator: 
 
 
 
 
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health 
Centre for Complex Interventions 
60 White Squirrel Way, Floor 3 
Toronto, Ontario M6J 1H4 
416-535-8501 ext. 39412 
 
Dr. Ishrat Husain MBBS, MD (Res.), MRCPsych 
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) 
100 Stokes Street, Room 4285 
Toronto, Ontario M6J1H4 
416-535-8501 ext. 37838 
 
 
Funder: 
University of Toronto, Department of Psychiatry 
250 College Street, 8th Floor 
Toronto, Ontario M5T1R8 
416-970-6948 
 
University of Toronto, Department of Anesthesiology 
123 Edward Street, 12th floor 
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2 
416-978-4306 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
3 
Table of Contents 
 
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE ................................................................................................. 5 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ 6 
CLINICAL TRIAL SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 9 
1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................10 
1.1 
BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................10 
1.2 
STUDY INTERVENTION ...................................................................................................10 
1.3 
PRECLINICAL DATA TO DATE...........................................................................................11 
1.4 
CLINICAL DATA TO DATE................................................................................................12 
1.5 
RISKS/BENEFITS..........................................................................................................14 
2.0 CLINICAL TRIAL OBJECTIVES .........................................................................................15 
2.1 
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE ....................................................................................................15 
2.2 
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................16 
3.0 CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN .................................................................................................16 
3.1 
OVERALL DESIGN ........................................................................................................16 
3.2 
PRIMARY ENDPOINTS....................................................................................................19 
3.3 
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS ...............................................................................................19 
4.0 PARTICIPANT SELECTION AND WITHDRAWAL ................................................................20 
4.1 
TARGET POPULATION ...................................................................................................20 
4.2 
PARTICIPANT RECRUITMENT AND SCREENING .....................................................................20 
4.3 
EQUITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION CONSIDERATIONS ..........................................................22 
4.4 
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ....................................................................................................22 
4.4.1 
Inclusion Criteria ....................................................................................................22 
4.4.2 
Exclusion Criteria ...................................................................................................23 
4.5 
LIFESTYLE CONSIDERATIONS ..........................................................................................24 
4.6 
SCREEN FAILURES .......................................................................................................24 
4.7 
PARTICIPANT WITHDRAWAL CRITERIA ...............................................................................25 
4.7.1 
When and How to Withdraw Participants ...................................................................25 
4.7.2 
Follow-up for Withdrawn Participants ........................................................................25 
4.7.3 
Early Termination Visit……………………………………………………………………………..14 
4.7.4 
Participants who are lost to Follow-up……………………………………………………………15 
 
5.0 STUDY INTERVENTION ....................................................................................................26 
5.1 
DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................26 
5.2 
TREATMENT REGIMEN...................................................................................................27 
5.3 
METHOD FOR ASSIGNING PARTICIPANTS TO TREATMENT GROUPS ...........................................28 
5.4 
ADMINISTRATION OF STUDY INTERVENTION ........................................................................28 
5.5 
PARTICIPANT COMPLIANCE MONITORING ...........................................................................28 
5.6 
CONCOMITANT THERAPY ...............................................................................................28 
5.7 
PACKAGING ................................................................................................................32 
5.8 
BLINDING OF STUDY INTERVENTION..................................................................................32 
5.9 
RECEIVING, STORAGE, DISPENSING AND RETURN................................................................32 
5.9.1 
Receipt of Study Intervention Supplies ......................................................................32 
5.9.2 
Storage ................................................................................................................32 
5.9.3 
Dispensing of Study Intervention ..............................................................................32 
5.9.4 
Return or Destruction of Study Intervention ................................................................33 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
4 
6.0 RESEARCH PROCEDURES ..............................................................................................33 
6.1 
RESEARCH VISITS ........................................................................................................33 
6.2 
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ..................................................................................................41 
7.0 STATISTICAL PLAN .........................................................................................................43 
7.1 
SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION ........................................................................................43 
7.2 
STATISTICAL METHODS .................................................................................................43 
8.0 SAFETY AND ADVERSE EVENTS .....................................................................................43 
8.1 
DEFINITIONS ...............................................................................................................43 
8.2 
RECORDING OF ADVERSE EVENTS ...................................................................................45 
8.3 
REPORTING OF SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS .......................................................................45 
8.3.1 
Investigator Reporting: Notifying the Sponsor .............................................................45 
8.3.2 
Investigator Reporting: Notifying the REB ..................................................................45 
8.3.3 
Sponsor Reporting of SUADRs: Notifying Health Canada .............................................46 
8.3.4 
Sponsor Reporting of SUADRs: Notifying Sites ...........................................................46 
8.4 
REPORTING OF DEVICE DEFICIENCIES...............................................................................46 
8.5 
SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN ..........................................................................................46 
8.6 
UNBLINDING PROCEDURES.............................................................................................47 
8.7 
DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING BOARD............................................................................47 
9.0 CLINICAL TRIAL DISCONTINUATION AND CLOSURE ........................................................47 
9.1 
CLINICAL TRIAL DISCONTINUATION ...................................................................................47 
10.0 DATA HANDLING AND RECORD KEEPING........................................................................48 
10.1 
SOURCE DOCUMENTS & CASE REPORT FORMS ..................................................................48 
10.2 
PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS ................................................................................................48 
10.3 
RECORD RETENTION ....................................................................................................48 
10.4 
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION .......................................................................................48 
11.0 STUDY MONITORING, AUDITING, AND INSPECTING..........................................................49 
11.1 
STUDY MONITORING PLAN .............................................................................................49 
11.2 
AUDITING AND INSPECTING.............................................................................................49 
12.0 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................49 
12.1 
RESEARCH ETHICS BOARD (REB) APPROVAL.....................................................................49 
12.2 
INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS & DOCUMENTATION .............................................................49 
13.0 PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY ....................................................................................50 
14.0 CLINICAL TRIAL FINANCES .............................................................................................51 
14.1 
FUNDING SOURCE........................................................................................................51 
14.2 
CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................51 
15.0 PUBLICATION POLICY/DATA SHARING ............................................................................51 
15.1 
FUTURE SECONDARY USE OF DATA .................................................................................52 
16.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................52 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
5 
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 
 
This clinical trial will be carried out in accordance with the following:  
• International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) 
• Tri-Council Policy Statement 2018 (TCPS 2) 
• ISO 14155:2020 for Medical Device Clinical Trials 
• Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA), 2004; Chapter 3 Schedule A 
(PHIPA) and applicable regulations 
• Food and Drugs Act  
o Part C, Division 5 of the Food and Drug Regulations 
• Institutional and REB policies and procedures 
 
 
 
 
 
 
________________________________  
_____________________________ 
Signature of PI 
 
 
 
 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
6 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 
AE 
 
Adverse Event 
ALT 
 
Alanine aminotransferase 
AST  
Aspartate aminotransferase 
ATC  
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical 
ATHF  
Antidepressant Treatment History Form 
CAMH 
Center for Addiction and Mental Health 
CGI 
 
Clinical Global Impression Scale 
CIHR  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research 
CRF   
Case report form(s) 
C-SSRS 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale 
DMT  
5-Hydroxytryptamine 
ECG 
Electrocardiography 
ECT 
Electroconvulsive therapy 
EDI 
Equity, diversity, and inclusion 
GAD-7 
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale 
GCP  
Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice 
HamD-17 
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 
HDPE  
High-density polyethylene 
HIPPD  
Hallucinogen-induced persistent perceptual disorder 
HPMC 
Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose 
GCP   
Good Clinical Practice 
ICF  
 
Informed consent form 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
7 
IP 
 
Investigational product 
IPAC  
Infection prevention and control 
LANSS 
Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs 
LSD   
Lysergic acid diethylamide  
MADRS 
Mongomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale 
MDD  
Major depressive disorder 
MDE  
Major depressive episode 
PAP  
Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy 
PHI 
 
Personal Health Information 
PHIPA 
Personal Health Information Protection Act 
PI 
 
Principal Investigator 
PRN  
Pro Re Nata 
PROMIS-PI Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain 
Intensity Scale 
PROMI-Interference Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain 
Interference Scale 
QI 
 
Qualified Investigator 
RCT  
Randomized controlled trial 
REB  
Research ethics board 
rTMS  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 
SAE  
Serious Adverse Event 
SCID-5 
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 
SETS  
Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
8 
SHAPS 
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale 
SSRI  
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor 
SUSAR  
Suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction 
TASS  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Adult Safety Screen 
TCPS 2 
Tri-Council Policy Statement  
TRD  
Treatment Resistant Depression 
TSC  
Trial Steering Committee 
 
WEMWS 
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale 
WHO-QoL-BREF 
World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire – Brief 
Version 
5D-ASC 
Five Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
9 
CLINICAL TRIAL SUMMARY 
 
Title 
Treatment with Psilocybin for Chronic Neuropathic Pain and 
Depression (TRANSCEND): An Open-Label Clinical Trial 
Short Title 
TRANSCEND 
Phase 
II Feasibility Trial 
Methodology 
Open Label Clinical Trial  
Clinical trial 
Duration 
24-months to complete all recruitment, study procedures, and 
data analysis.  
Participating site(s) 
CAMH 
Objectives 
To assess the feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy 
of psilocybin therapy for adults with chronic neuropathic pain 
and co-morbid TRD to inform a larger RCT 
Number of 
Participants 
Sixteen participants diagnosed with treatment resistant 
depression and chronic neuropathic pain 
Study Intervention 
Reference 
Therapy/Comparator 
25 mg of psilocybin taken in conjunction with psilocybin-
assisted psychotherapy (PAP).  
Duration of 
Intervention 
One day: 5-6 hours  
Statistical 
Methodology 
Characteristics of the trial cohort will be summarized by mean 
(SD), median (minimum, maximum). Summary raw scores 
will be presented at each assessment time both numerically 
and graphically. The small sample size means that 
conservative nonparametric testing is required in order to 
address the primary and secondary objectives. Exact paired 
permutation t-tests will be used to determine whether 
psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy achieves a 50% reduction 
in MADRS and a reduction in both pain intensity and pain 
interference. 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
10 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 
1.1 
Background 
Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) affects up to a third of all depressed individuals 
(Wiles et al., 2013). Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability 
worldwide. Although depressive symptoms are amenable to pharmacotherapy, a high 
proportion of patients experience TRD, typically defined as not responding to two or more 
adequate antidepressant trials, or relapse during treatment (Gaynes et al., 2020; Rush et 
al., 2006). TRD is associated with a significant decline in social and occupational 
functioning and higher rates of death by suicide and all-cause mortality (Reutfors et al., 
2018). Persistent symptoms in TRD often translate into substantial increases in work loss, 
healthcare resource utilization, and costs, compared to more responsive forms of illness 
(Li et al., 2020). Current pharmacotherapy for TRD, including augmentation of 
antidepressants with atypical antipsychotics, lithium, or ketamine have high rates of non-
response (Carter et al., 2020) and can be associated with problematic adverse effects 
(e.g., sedation, weight gain, diabetes, tardive dyskinesia) leading to non-adherence (Ho 
et al., 2017). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most efficacious intervention for TRD. 
However, many patients with TRD refuse ECT because of stigma, lack of access, and 
fears of cognitive adverse effects (Wilkinson et al., 2021). Transcranial magnetic 
stimulation (rTMS) is an alternative to ECT but its response and remission rates are 
similar to pharmacotherapy (Carter et al., 2020), leaving a large proportion of patients 
with TRD in need of novel interventions. 
 
Chronic neuropathic pain is a debilitating condition that causes shooting, burning and 
stabbing sensations that are often constant and unrelenting in severity. The impact on 
quality of life is substantially more than in other chronic pain conditions, with 17% of 
neuropathic pain patients rating their condition as “worse than death”(Torrance et al., 
2014). Unfortunately, the condition is common, affecting 10% of Canadians resulting in 
significant economic costs in terms of healthcare utilization and lost productivity (Schaefer et 
al., 2014; VanDenKerkhof et al., 2016). Despite the high prevalence and severe disease 
burden, few therapeutic options are available for individuals with chronic neuropathic pain. 
While guidelines and recommendations for medications to treat neuropathic pain exist, 
evidence demonstrates that even first-line agents have limited efficacy and poor 
tolerability(Derry et al., 2019; Ferreira et al., 2023; Moore et al., 2014). Another reason for 
the high rate of treatment resistance could be that an estimated 40-80% of patients with 
neuropathic pain also suffer from concurrent major depressive disorder (MDD)(Bair et al., 
2003; Cherif et al., 2020). 
 
Research has shown that co-morbid pain and MDD confers worse outcomes than either 
disease alone (Dhanju et al., 2019). Patients with pain and co-morbid MDD have more 
pain complaints, greater pain intensity, higher healthcare utilization and longer duration 
of pain(Bair et al., 2003). Despite the relatively high prevalence and severe disease 
burden, few therapeutic options are available for individuals with co-morbid chronic 
neuropathic pain and MDD. While antidepressants are often considered in the treatment 
of neuropathic pain, patients with co-morbid disease are more likely to have persistent 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
11 
pain that is refractory to treatment (Burton et al., 1995; Emir et al., 2017). Therefore, a 
significant unmet need exists for novel therapies that effectively manage concomitant 
neuropathic pain and MDD.  
1.2 
Study Intervention 
Psilocybin is a chemical compound that naturally occurs in certain species of mushrooms, 
(for example, in the psilocybe genus, among others). It belongs to a class of drugs 
referred to as ‘psychedelics’. Psilocybin is a tryptamine that is chemically similar to the 
neurotransmitter, serotonin, and the essential amino acid, tryptophan (Johnson et al., 
2019). It is considered a 5-hydroxytrptamineric (serotonergic) psychedelic along with 
other similar drugs such as dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and lysergic acid dieythamide 
(LSD). Psilocybin is a prodrug for the pharmacologically active ingredient psilocin, which 
readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and acts as a potential partial agonist at serotonin 
5HT2A and 5HT2c receptors in the brain (Halberstadt et al., 2011; Madsen et al., 2019). 
Typical effects of psilocybin include significantly altered states of consciousness, 
experienced through visual and sometimes auditory effects, changes in perception, 
distortions of time, and a range of effects including a sense of awe, novel perspectives, 
existential and personal insight, dramatically heightened empathy and feelings of 
compassion, strong emotions, and unitive experience. These mystical experiences are 
correlated with improvements in mood in healthy volunteers and palliative patients with 
end-of-life distress  
 
Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) has been gaining traction as a promising 
potential treatment for many mental illnesses, including end-of-life anxiety and treatment-
resistant depression (Perkins et al., 2021). PAP procedures typically involve 
psychological preparation prior to therapist-supported psilocybin dosing sessions. These 
sessions are used to establish a therapeutic relationship, inform participants about what 
to expect, and set expectations for the dosing session. During the psilocybin dosing 
session, trained therapists support the individual through their experience and 
psychological integration therapy occurs after the dosing experience. Evidence from 
recent clinical trials suggest that PAP can help in the reduction of anxiety, depression, 
and substance use (Carhart-Harris et al., 2021; Griffiths et al., 2016; Grob et al., 2011; 
Ross et al., 2016). Further, there is also preliminary data suggesting that psilocybin may 
be effective for a myriad of pain conditions (Castellanos et al., 2020; Goel et al., 2023). 
With proper screening and preparation, psilocybin has a safe physiological and 
psychological profile.  
 
1.3 
Preclinical Data to Date 
Animal studies looking into the effects of psychedelics in rodents have found evidence for 
improvements in behavioral outcomes, assessed by measures of coping strategy and 
cognitive function. The long-term effects using LSD (Buchborn et al., 2014; Hibicke et al., 
2020), psilocin (Horsley et al., 2018), psilocybin (Hibicke et al., 2020), and DMT (Cameron 
et al., 2019; Cameron et al., 2018) were comparable to traditional treatment 
antidepressants. Moreover, there is evidence suggesting improvements in dimensions of 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
12 
cognitive function, such as enhanced associative learning (Buchborn et al., 2014; Harvey, 
2003) which are commonly impaired in major depressive disorder (Castaneda et al., 
2008). Similarly, psilocybin also has a high affinity for the 5-HT2A receptor. The intensity 
of psilocybin-induced perceptual changes is correlated with serotonin 2A receptor (5-
HT2AR) activation (Madsen et al., 2019). In a study involving 8-week old mice exposed 
to a chronic multimodal stress paradigm, hedonic state was assayed with an appetize 
choice task: a two-bottle sucrose preference test comparing consumption of a 1% sucrose 
solution and water (Hesselgrave et al., 2021). Psilocybin injections restored preference 
for sucrose solution whereas mice given a saline injection retained low sucrose 
(Hesselgrave et al., 2021). In the second part of the study, researchers pre-treated the 
mice with a 5-HT2A/2C antagonist prior to the psilocybin or saline injection. The results 
indicated that the behavioural responses to the sucrose test were not prevented when the 
antagonist was administered (Hesselgrave et al., 2021).  
 
Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that both MDD and chronic pain share common 
biological pathways and neurotransmitters (Bair et al., 2003). The emerging evidence 
on the underlying mechanisms of psilocybin’s therapeutic effects suggest that it could 
lead to improvements for patients experiencing chronic pain, especially neuropathic 
pain. While the exact pathways through which psilocybin produces its therapeutic 
benefits are not fully elucidated, pre-clinical studies have suggested several possibilities 
including anti-inflammatory effects via activation of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor and 
disruption of spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity (Carhart-Harris et al., 2014; Kuner 
& Flor, 2016). 
 
 
1.4 
Clinical Data to Date 
During the past decade, there has been a resurgence of interest in psychedelic 
compounds as novel treatments for mental disorders including TRD. In particular, 
psilocybin, the chemical component of “magic mushrooms” at doses of 20-30 mg, in 
conjunction 
with supportive 
psychotherapy, 
has shown large 
and sustained 
antidepressant effects in patients with MDD and TRD in contemporary open-label and 
randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (Carhart Harris et el., 2016; Carhart Harris et al., 2021; 
Davis et al., 2021). For instance, in an open-label trial of psilocybin-assisted 
psychotherapy (PAP), 63% of 19 participants with TRD responded 1 week after treatment, 
and 32% were not on any antidepressant or therapy for a further year (Carhart Harri et 
al., 2016). Similarly, an RCT of 24 participants with MDD showed large effect sizes for 
PAP at week 1 (Cohen d = 2.5) and week 4 (Cohen d = 2.6) post-treatment compared 
with waitlist control (Davis et al., 2021). A long-term follow-up study of the same 
participants showed response and remission rates of 75% and 58%, respectively, at 12 
months (Gukasyan et al., 2022). More recently, a trial comparing PAP with escitalopram 
in 59 participants with non-refractory MDD showed that PAP was as effective as 
escitalopram in reducing depressive symptoms with no differences in adverse effects 
between groups (Carhart Harris et a;., 2021). Recently, an international phase II RCT of 
PAP for 233 patients with TRD was completed. Preliminary findings indicate that 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
13 
psilocybin 25 mg led to a significant reduction in scores on the Montgomery-Abserg 
Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) for at least 6 weeks post-treatment, compared to 
psilocybin 1 mg (an active placebo), without significant differences in serious adverse 
events between groups (COMPASS, 2021). 
 
 
Further, the improvements seen in mood in participants of previous psilocybin therapy 
trials may also lead to benefits in chronic pain especially those with co-morbid MDD 
(Bondesson et al., 2018). A recent review of proposed mechanisms for psychedelics 
(including psilocybin) to affect chronic pain, deemed that the strongest evidence for any 
therapeutic potential is for neuropathic pain states (Castellanos et al., 2020). Thus, there 
is established plausibility based on existing data that psilocybin could be particularly 
helpful for patients suffering with comorbid chronic neuropathic pain and MDD.  
 
While these theoretical mechanisms demonstrate promise, the benefits have not yet been 
translated into clinical evidence.  Our team conducted a scoping-review of studies 
examining the use of psychedelics to treat chronic pain conditions (Goel et al., 2023). 
After a systematic search, we identified 21 studies of which 13 included psilocybin. 
Further, only 3 case reports described a change in both mood and pain. Although the 
general trend was that psychedelics improved outcomes for patients with chronic pain, 
study designs with a high risk of bias and small sample sizes precluded conclusions about 
their therapeutic effects. 
 
This vacuum of clinical evidence has unfortunately been occupied by a “psychedelic hype 
bubble” with some media communications touting psychedelics as a ‘miracle cure’ for a 
myriad of ailments (Yaden et al., 2022). Without evidence to guide therapeutic decisions, 
patients who are desperately seeking relief from their pain are particularly vulnerable and 
at risk of suffering adverse effects that range from financial costs to psychological 
deterioration (Yaden et al., 2022). In one study of 354 patients with chronic pain, 30% 
reported prior psychedelic use and the majority had a favorable view of psychedelics as 
a form of treatment (Glynos et al., 2023).  
 
The mismatch between evidence and perception amongst pain patients, creates an 
urgent need for a feasibility trial to fill this significant gap in the field. While there is an 
exponential growth in the number of clinical trials proposed related to psychedelics and 
mental health, this is not true for chronic pain. A review of Health Canada’s Clinical Trial 
Database shows that there is only a single, industry-funded study examining the use of 
psilocybin for opioid-weaning in chronic pain patients in Canada (NCT05585229). 
However, this study has significant design flaws such as the fact that patients with a wide 
range of chronic pain condition from migraines to fibromyalgia can be included. Further, 
a search of Clinicaltrials.gov shows that there are no currently registered trials that will be 
examining psilocybin for general neuropathic pain. Thus, the proposed trial would be 
ground-breaking, representing a significant advancement towards understanding the role 
of psychedelics in chronic neuropathic pain therapy, in Canada and globally.  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
14 
We propose an open label, proof of concept study in 16 adult patients with chronic 
neuropathic pain and comorbid TRD where each participant will receive 25 mg of 
psilocybin. 
1.5 
Risks/Benefits 
 
Possible Benefits 
As with any research study, no direct benefit can be promised to research participants. 
Clinical trials investigating psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy in depression cohorts have 
indicated rapid and dramatic reductions in participants’ symptoms. Participants may also 
experience improvements in chronic pain symptoms. Therefore, participants may receive 
some benefit from the study if PAP is effective in improving depressive symptoms and 
symptoms of chronic pain. Participants may also benefit from close monitoring of their 
clinical conditions.  
 
Psilocybin Risks 
 
We do not expect any major risks to the safety of participants. Psilocybin-containing 
mushrooms have been used safely by indigenous cultures in Central and South America 
for hundreds of years (Carod-Artal, 2015; Johnson et al., 2018). Expert consensus 
indicates that psilocybin is safe in human pre-clinical and clinical trial research (Johnson 
et al., 2008). A meta-analysis of clinical trials of psilocybin and other serotonergic 
psychedelics found no significant differences in adverse events between those receiving 
psilocybin and placebo. (Galvão-Coelho et al., 2021). In recently conducted RCTs, these 
adverse events were transient, tolerable, and resolved within the timeframe of the 8-hour 
dosing session, including: transient anxiety; minor elevation in heart rate or blood 
pressure; and mild nausea upon initiating the dose. (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016; Davis et 
al., 2021; Griffiths et al., 2016; Grob et al., 2013; Ross et al., 2016). However, psilocybin, 
especially at higher doses, can be associated with more concerning psychological effects. 
Psilocybin given at a dose of 25mg is expected to alter mood, cognition, and perception. 
Common psychological and adverse effects of psilocybin include transient anxiety, 
changes in thought form or thought speed (slowing down or speeding up of thought 
processes), depersonalization, derealization, inattention, impaired concentration, labile 
mood, altered perception of time. These effects are both expected component of the 
therapeutic response. Psilocybin can produce sympathetic system activation resulting in 
physiological effects such as pupillary dilation and detectable, but moderate increases in 
blood pressure or heart rate, transient nausea, diarrhea, paresthesia, dizziness, fatigue 
and headache. In rare cases, hallucinogen-induced persistent perceptual disorder 
(HIPPD) where individuals experience the effects of psilocybin for longer than expected. 
These have not been any reported cases of this in modern clinical settings, but it has 
been rarely reported following recreational use. With proper screening and preparation, 
psilocybin has a safe physiological and psychological profile. As with any investigational 
product trial, there is a possibility that some participants may experience a worsening of 
their mental state after the drug experience. Reports of this are very rare and have not 
been seen in other similar studies. Published findings on harm profiles associated with 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
15 
drugs most commonly used in the UK and Australia consistently rate ‘magic mushrooms’ 
as being one of the least harmful substances to one’s self and to society (Nutt et al., 
2010). In order to mitigate risks, a preparatory therapy session will be scheduled with 
each participant to prepare them for what to expect during the experience. It is important 
to assess psilocybin tolerability (Primary Aim) given the high rate of noncompliance with 
antidepressant treatment related to perceived adverse effects. (Nomi et al., 2017). 
 
 
 
Medication Tapering Risks 
There will be a washout period of a minimum of 2 weeks (4 weeks for fluoxetine) for 
participants taking any concomitant medications prior to Baseline (V2). Withdrawing from 
medications may result in difficulty sleeping, nausea, diarrhea, flu-like symptoms, and 
jitters. These symptoms are not dangerous and usually pass in a few days. In addition, 
tapering off antidepressant medications can result in the worsening of a participant’s 
symptoms. During the tapering period, the participant will be seen clinically by the study 
physician. If the participant is not on any prohibited medication, a monitoring period of 2 
weeks will apply, prior to the baseline visit.   
 
Blood Draw 
There may be mild temporary discomfort, minor bruising or irritation, and in rare cases 
there may be local infection at the vein site. The blood draws are required to establish 
safety and eligibility for the trial.   
 
ECG 
Skin irritation from the ECG electrode pads or pain when removing the sticky pads are 
possible side effects. 
 
Assessment Measures 
Assessment measures are designed to address various aspects of psychopathology and 
as such, may be distressing. Participants may experience emotional reactions to the 
questions and when providing responses about the material on the questionnaires and in 
the interviews. Any distress or discomfort encountered by participants will be addressed 
by a member of the study team. In addition, the assessments may cause fatigue. These 
risks will be mitigated by offering breaks throughout the study visits.  
 
2.0 CLINICAL TRIAL OBJECTIVES  
The overall objective is to conduct a  
2.1 
Primary Objective 
To evaluate the feasibility and safety of administering psilocybin (25mg) in adults with 
TRD and chronic neuropathic pain by evaluating feasibility and safety.  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
16 
Hypothesis 1a (feasibility): We will be able to recruit 16 participants within 18 months with 
a retention of >90%. 
Hypothesis 1b (safety): Psilocybin 25mg will not be associated with serious adverse 
events (SAE’s) or Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (SUADR’s). 
 
2.2 
Secondary Objective 
To evaluate antidepressant effects as measured by the change in the MADRS from 
Baseline (V2) to 1-week post-treatment (V5). Antidepressant effects will also be 
measured at Weeks 2 (V6), month 1 (V7), and month 3 (V8) post-intervention. Response 
will be defined as a reduction of 50% or more of the MADRS score and remission defined 
as a score of <7 on the MADRS from Baseline (V2) to Week 1 (V5). 
 
2.3 
Exploratory Objective 
To evaluate effects on neuropathic pain as measured by the change in the PROMIS-PI 
and PROMIS-Interference from Baseline (V2) to 1-week post-treatment (V5). Pain relief 
effects will also be measured at Weeks 2 (V6), month 1 (V7), and month 3 (V8) post-
intervention. A clinically meaningful response will be defined as a reduction of 4 points or 
more of the PROMIS_PI from Baseline (V2) to Week 1 (V5) (Yost et al., 2011) and a 
reduction of 2.5 points or more on the PROMIS-Interference score from Baseline (V2) to 
Week 1 (V5) (Chen et al., 2018).  
 
3.0 CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN 
3.1 
Overall Design 
 
 
Overview of Study Design: 
A member of the study team will obtain informed consent prior to any study related 
activities. If consent is obtained, participants will undergo a screening assessment where 
they will complete lab tests, and clinical and psychiatric assessments to determine. 
Following the screening visit, eligible participants will undergo a washout period where 
they will be tapered off concomitant medication over a period of 2-6 weeks. The length of 
the tapering period will depend on the type of medication the participant is being tapered 
off (based on the half-life of the medication) and the participant’s preference for the length 
of the tapering period. Most medications will require a minimum of a 2-week tapering 
period   before the baseline, with the exception of fluoxetine, which will require a minimum 
of 4-weeks. Additional time may be added at the discretion of the study investigator. 
During the tapering period, the study psychiatrist will see participants weekly (V1a, V1b, 
etc.) for at least 2 weeks to monitor for withdrawal, worsening of depressive symptoms 
and worsening of chronic pain symptoms and suicidality. Suicidality will be closely 
monitored using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Participants and 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
17 
their family members/carers will be educated on the signs and symptoms of worsening 
depression and suicidality and will be given contact details of the study team in case of 
major decline in mental state or worsening of chronic pain symptoms. 
 
At the Baseline visit (V2), which occurs the day before the dosing session, participants 
will complete clinical measures, and undergo a preparatory session (up to 4 hours) with 
the study therapists. These sessions will build a therapeutic alliance, provide 
psychoeducation about, and set intentions for, the psilocybin session. To reduce 
participant burden, baseline can be broken up into multiple days, however all 
assessments must be completed within 7-days of the intervention. Ideally, baseline 
occurs the day before the intervention is administered.  
 
The psilocybin session (Day 0 [V3]) will last 5-6 hours and will be conducted in the existing 
psychedelic treatment suite developed at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health 
(CAMH) Mood Disorder Service by Dr. Husain (PI). Two trained study therapists will be 
supporting each participant during the dosing session. Participants will receive psilocybin 
25 mg. All participants will receive 12-14 hours of manualized supportive psychotherapy 
(which includes the 5-6 hour dosing session). After 5 hours of dose administration, 
participants will be evaluated for safety by the study psychiatrist and discharged home.  
 
After the dosing session, participants will be seen for two 1-hour integration sessions (Day 
1 [V4], Week 1 [V5]). Thereafter, participants will be followed-up after 2 weeks [V6], 1 
month [V7] and 3 months [V8] post-dosing (see Figure 1). A study psychiatrist will be 
available throughout the duration of the trial to respond to any concerns or changes in 
mental/physical state. Participants will not start other interventions for MDD or chronic 
pain during the study.

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
18 
 
Figure 1. Study Schematic: 
 
Timeline 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
19 
 
3.2 
Primary Endpoints 
Feasibility endpoints will be evaluated by monitoring recruitment and retention rates.  
 
Dropouts during three periods will be evaluated: 1) during preparatory medication 
tapering and washout period, 2) during the acute course of the study intervention, and 3) 
the one-month follow-up period. Throughout all three periods, we will also evaluate 
adverse events including psychological distress and serious adverse events (e.g., 
hospitalization, suicide attempt, death). 
 
Safety endpoint is the number and severity of adverse events reported, it will be evaluated 
using standardized adverse events monitoring at all-time points. Adverse event 
monitoring will be prioritized to closely and thoroughly evaluate safety profile of the 
psilocybin. Constant observation by therapists will monitor for adverse events during the 
dosing sessions. An on-call psychiatrist will be available at all times to further assess as 
needed for acute concerns, as needed.  
 
3.3 
Secondary Endpoints 
The antidepressant effects will be assessed by measuring changes from Baseline (V2) to 
Week 1 (V5) on MADRS. Baseline is defined as the assessment score obtained on Day 
-1 (V2). The primary time-point is Week 1 (V5). The changes in MADRS from Baseline to 
Day 1 (V4), and Week 2 (V6), 1 month (30 days) (V7), and 3 months (90 days) (V8) post-
dosing will also be analyzed. Other clinical outcomes include response defined as a 
reduction of 50% or more of the MADRS score and remission defined as a score of <7 
on the MADRS from Baseline (V2) to Week 1 (V5). 
 
The effects on symptoms of chronic pain will be assessed by measuring changes from 
Baseline (V2) to Week 1 (V5) on PROMIS. Baseline is defined as the assessment score 
obtained on Day -1 (V2). The primary time-point is Week 1 (V5). The changes in PROMIS 
from Baseline to Day 1 (V4), and Week 2 (V6), 1 month (30 days) (V7), and 3 months (90 
days) (V8) post-dosing will also be analyzed. Other clinical outcomes include response 
defined as a reduction of 4 points or more of the PROMIS_PI from Baseline (V2) to Week 
1 (V5) (Yost et al., 2011) and a reduction of 2.5 points or more on the PROMIS-
Interference score from Baseline (V2) to Week 1 (V5) (Chen et al., 2018).  
 
3.4 
Exploratory Endpoints 
 
Other outcome measures will be changes from Baseline (V2) to Week 1 (V5) in the 
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale (Busner & Targum, 2007), World Health 
Organization Quality of Life Short Version (WHOQOLBREF) (Skevington et al., 2004), 
and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) (Spitzer et al., 2006). Additional 
behavioural assessments will include measures of anhedonia (Snaith Hamilton 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
20 
Anhedonia Pleasure Scale, SHAPS) (Snaith et al., 1995), wellbeing (Warwick-Edinburgh 
Mental Wellbeing Scale, WEMWS) (Tennant et al., 2007) and the experience after 
psilocybin administration (Mystical Experiences Questionnaire, MEQ) (Barrett et al., 
2015). 
 
 
4.0 PARTICIPANT SELECTION AND WITHDRAWAL 
4.1 
Target Population 
The target population for this study are adults aged 18-65 who are diagnosed with major 
depressive disorder and experiencing a clinically significant depressive episode that has 
failed to respond to at least two adequate trials of antidepressants. Participants must also 
have a diagnosis of chronic neuropathic pain with no meaningful improvement from trial 
of at least two medications for pain management. Participants must meet all 
inclusionary/exclusionary study criteria as confirmed by the study investigator. In order to 
be eligible, these criteria must be met at the Baseline visit (V2). For participants on 
concomitant medications, confirmation of eligibility occurs after a successful washout 
period in which the participant has been tapered off concomitant medications for a period 
of at least 2-weeks prior to baseline (4-weeks for fluoxetine), as confirmed by the study 
investigator.  
4.2 
Participant Recruitment and Screening 
The target sample size is 16 participants (N=16) diagnosed with treatment-resistant 
depression and chronic neuropathic pain. The study will take place at a single site: the 
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto, Ontario.  
 
The source of participants in this study will come from CAMH outpatient clinics and the 
St. Michael’s Hospital Pain Clinic. Clinicians at CAMH and St. Michael’s Hospital Pain 
Clinic may identify potential research participants and obtain verbal permission from these 
potential participants for a member of the research team to approach them. Potential 
participants that are interested in participating in the study will be prescreened by a 
member of the study team, as outlined below. After referral and consented to screening, 
I-Care will be used to confirm their eligibility. 
 
 
Prescreening Procedures 
Once a potential participant contacts the research team or is referred to the research 
team as an interested potential participant, a research team member will schedule a 
phone call. This phone call will be referred to hereafter as the Pre-Screening 
conversation. During the pre-screening conversation, a brief description of the study is 
provided to the potential participant and then, if the person agrees, the following eligibility 
criteria is obtained: 
• Contact information (phone number and/or email) 
• Partial date of birth  

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
21 
• Ability to read and speak English 
• Whether they have a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder 
• Whether they are currently experiencing a major depressive episode 
• Whether they have a diagnosis of chronic neuropathic pain 
• Treatments taken for chronic pain (frequency and type of treatment) 
• Treatments taken for major depressive episode (frequency and type of treatment) 
• Whether the potential participant has been diagnosed with psychotic disorder, 
bipolar disorder, paranoid personality disorder, schizoaffective disorder, or 
borderline personality disorder; 
• Diagnosis of a substance use disorder (recreational use of tobacco, alcohol, 
cannabis, and prescribed opioids are permitted) within the previous 6-months; 
• If they are currently undergoing therapy and if they are, the date that they started 
• Whether the potential participant would be willing to discontinue current 
antidepressant medications  
• Whether they are seeing a doctor on a regular basis for a medical problem 
• If they are currently taking medications for the treatment of a physical health 
problem 
• Difficulty with giving blood or needles 
• Currently nursing or pregnant 
• Willingness to take contraceptives for the duration of the study 
• If they have been using contraceptives for at least the previous 3-months 
• Currently enrolled in another study involving an investigational product or device 
• If they are able to take medication orally 
• If they have ever used psychedelic drugs  
 
The information collected during this conversation will be recorded on the pre-screen form 
which will be reviewed by the study PI. If the potential participant does not meet any 
exclusionary criteria as listed on the Pre-Screen form, then the potential participant is 
called back to invite them to schedule a consent and screening visit.  
 
If the person meets any exclusionary criteria during the pre-screening conversation or as 
determined by the study investigator, then the person is asked whether they would be 
interested in participating in any other studies (current or future) within our program. If 
they are interested in other studies within our department, their name and contact 
information will be transferred to a password protected log that is only accessible by the 
Mood Disorder Services and the Centre for Complex Interventions staff. If they fail the 
pre-screen and do not wish to be contacted, their pre-screen form will be discarded in the 
confidential shredding bin which will then be securely disposed of. However, their name 
will be kept in a password protected log along with the date and result (pass/fail) of their 
pre-screen so if they contact us again (e.g. to inquire about their eligibility) we can refer 
back to it.  
 
Compensation 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
22 
Participants will not be charged for research-only services for their participation in this 
study. All research-only services, such as clinical assessments, blood work, and the IP 
will be provided at no cost to the participant.  
 
Participants will be reimbursed for the cost of parking incurred at each study visit. To 
receive reimbursement for parking expenses incurred at each study visit, participants 
must provide the research team with a parking receipt. In addition, TTC fare will be 
provided if the participant used public transit for transportation to and/or from study 
appointments. Participants will also be reimbursed for any taxi, Uber or Lyft costs due to 
travel to and from study appointments.  
 
Participants will also be reimbursed for the time spent at study visits occurring after the 
screening and washout period where treatment (therapy or the intervention) is not 
administered. Participants will be reimbursed $10 per hour for each study visit that they 
attend (V6, V7, and V8). In total, if participants complete all study visits, they may be 
reimbursed up to $25 for their time. Compensation will be provided at the end of the 
sessions in the form of e-gift card, as follow-up sessions are conducted virtually. No 
payment will be provided in advance.  
 
Study Visit: 
Duration: 
Compensation: 
Follow-Up: Visit 6 
~1 hour 
$10 
Follow-Up: Visit 7 
~ 30 min. 
$5 
Follow-Up: Visit 8 
~1 hour 
$10 
 
 
4.3 
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Considerations 
Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) are important to ensuring the study design is ethically 
sound. No exclusions will be made based on race, ethnicity, religion, sex, or gender.  
4.4 
Eligibility Criteria 
4.4.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
The participant must meet all of the inclusion criteria to eligible for this clinical trial: 
 
1. Adults 18 to 65 years old; 
2. Are outpatients; 
3. Must be deemed to have capacity to provide informed consent; 
4. Must sign and date the informed consent form; 
5. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures; 
6. Ability to read and communicate in English, such that their literacy and comprehension 
is sufficient for understanding the consent form and study questionnaires, as 
evaluated by study staff obtaining consent; 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
23 
7. Primary DSM-5 diagnosis of non-psychotic MDD, single or recurrent, based on the 
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) administered at the first screening 
visit; 
8. Participants diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression defined as individuals with 
a baseline HamD-17 score > 14 and that have not responded to two or more separate 
trials of antidepressants at an adequate dosage and duration (an antidepressant 
resistance rating score of three or more is considered an adequate trial)  based on the 
Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) (Sackeim & Sackeim, 2001); there is 
no upper limit on the number of treatment failures; 
9. Diagnosis of chronic neuropathic pain as determined by a pain specialist and confirmed 
with the standardized Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) 
questionnaire25  
10. Moderate-to-severe neuropathic pain determined by Patient Reported Outcomes 
Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference score of > 6026, as well 
as mean pain intensity scores > 5 on a numeric rating scale27 
11. Previous trials of at least two medications recommended in the Canadian consensus 
guidelines on the management of neuropathic pain with no self-reported meaningful 
improvement in symptoms 
12. Ability to take oral medication; 
13. Individuals with an eGFR above 40mL/min/1.73m2 and all blood work on clinical 
laboratory tests assessed as not clinically significant by study delegate physician at 
Screening (V1) 
14. Individuals who are capable of becoming pregnant: use of highly effective 
contraception for at least 1 month prior to screening and agreement to use such a 
method during study participation; 
15. Individuals who are willing to taper off current antidepressant and antipsychotic 
medications for a minimum of 2-weeks (or more depending on the medication) prior 
to Baseline (V2) and for the duration of the study and whose physician confirms that 
it is safe for them to do so; and 
16. Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations (section 4.5) throughout study 
duration. 
4.4.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in 
this clinical trial: 
1. Pregnant as assessed by a urine pregnancy test at Screening (V1) or individual’s that 
intend to become pregnant during the study or are breastfeeding; 
2. Treatment with another investigational drug or other intervention within 30 days of 
Screening (V1); 
3. Have initiated psychotherapy in the preceding 12 weeks prior to Screening (V1); 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
24 
4. Have a DSM-5 diagnosis of substance use disorder (recreational use of tobacco, 
alcohol, cannabis and prescribed opioids are permitted) within the preceding 6 
months; 
5. Have active suicidal ideation with intent and plan as determined by item 3 of the 
HamD-17; 
6. Any DSM-5 lifetime diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder; obsessive-
compulsive disorder, psychotic disorder (unless substance induced or due to a 
medical condition), bipolar I or II disorder, paranoid personality disorder, borderline 
personality disorder, or neurocognitive disorder as determined by medical history and 
the SCID-5 clinical interview; 
7. Any first-degree relative with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder; 
psychotic disorder (unless substance-induced or due to a medical condition); or 
bipolar I or II disorder as determined by the family medical history form and 
discussions with the participant; 
8. Presence of a relative or absolute contraindication to psilocybin, including a drug 
allergy, recent stroke history, uncontrolled hypertension, low or labile blood pressure, 
recent myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmic, severe coronary artery disease, or 
moderate to severe renal or hepatic impairment. 
9. Presence of baseline prolonged QTc or Torsade de Pointes as measured by the ECG 
or a history of long QTc syndrome or related risk factors; 
10. Individuals who are currently taking methadone, buprenorphine or > 100 milligrams of 
morphine (or morphine equivalents). 
11. Any other clinically significant physical illness including chronic infectious diseases or 
any other major concurrent illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere 
with the interpretation of the study results or constitute a health risk for the participant 
if they take part in the study.  
4.5 
Lifestyle Considerations 
During this clinical trial, participants are asked to: 
• Abstain from alcohol for 24 hours before the intervention and for up to six hours after 
intervention administration. 
• Abstain from the use of any prescribed opioids, benzodiazepines, or sleep aids (Z-
drugs) within 12hrs prior to the intervention (V3) and for up to 6hrs after administration.  
• Abstain from any illicit drugs (e.g. cocaine, ecstasy/MDMA, hallucinogens) and/or 
cannabis for the duration of the study. 
• Abstain from driving or operating heavy machinery for up to 24hrs after the intervention. 
4.6 
Screen Failures  
Screen failures are defined as participants who consent to participate in the clinical trial 
but do not meet one or more eligibility criteria required for participation. The screening 
period for participants in this study occurs before Baseline (V2) and eligibility for the study 
cannot be confirmed until the participant had tapered off any concomitant medication. In 
order to be eligible, the participant must meet all eligibility criteria as outlined in Section 
4.4. The information collected about the participant during the screening process 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
25 
including demography, screen failure details, eligibility criteria not met, and any AEs/SAEs 
will be used for the purposes of transparent reporting. Participants who are deemed 
ineligible will continue with their usual standard of care or may be referred to other 
research protocols for TRD and/or chronic pain.  
4.7 
Participant Withdrawal Criteria 
4.7.1 
When and How to Withdraw Participants 
Participants are free to withdraw from participation in the clinical trial at any time.  
An investigator will discontinue or withdraw a participant from the clinical trial for the 
following reasons: 
• Pregnancy or if participants cease effective contraception; 
• Significant study intervention non-compliance; 
• If any adverse event (AE), laboratory abnormality, or other medical condition or 
situation occurs such that continued participation in the clinical trial would not be in the 
best interest of the participant; 
• Disease progression which requires discontinuation of the study intervention; 
• If the participant meets an exclusion criterion (either newly developed or not previously 
recognized) that precludes further study participation; or 
 
The reason for participant discontinuation or withdrawal from the study will be recorded      
within the participant’s research record, and/or health record at CAMH. 
 
Participants that are withdrawn from the study will be replaced using the same recruitment 
methods as outlined in Section 4.2: Participant Recruitment and Screening.  
4.7.2 
Follow-up for Withdrawn Participants 
If a participant withdraws consent, the information that was provided by the participant 
and recorded by the study team before they withdrew consent will not be destroyed. 
However, once withdrawn from the clinical trial, no further research procedures or 
evaluations will be performed, or additional research-specific data collected on the 
participant. Reasonable effort will be made to obtain permission to document the reason 
for withdrawal.  
 
Withdrawn participants will be seen clinically by the study investigator to ensure a plan 
for continued care outside of the study is established. If the participant is interested in 
hearing about other treatment options, they may be offered a referral to the CBT group at 
CAMH and/or a consultation with a psychiatrist to discuss pharmacotherapy options.   
4.7.3 
Early Termination Visit 
If a participant withdraws from the clinical trial, every effort should be made to perform an 
Early Termination Visit. 
 
Participants that withdraw after the first dosing session:  

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
26 
If the participant is willing to attend an early termination visit, the following information will 
be documented: 
• Assessment of new and ongoing AEs; 
• Assessment of any complications following the study intervention; 
• Documentation of all concomitant medications; 
The PI will also ensure the participant is appropriately transitioned/followed for any 
additional care as required. 
4.7.4 
Participants who are Lost to Follow-up 
A participant will be considered lost to follow-up if they fail to return for 2 or more 
scheduled visits and is unable to be contacted by the research team.  
 
The following actions will be taken if a participant fails to attend a required study visit: 
• The research team will attempt to contact the participant and reschedule the missed 
visit 7 days, counsel the participant on the importance of maintaining the assigned visit 
schedule, and reconfirm whether the participant wishes to and/or should continue in 
the clinical trial.  
• Before a participant is deemed lost to follow-up, the research team will make every 
effort to regain contact with the participant via 2 different methods of contact (e.g. 
telephone and email). These contact attempts should be documented in the 
participant’s research record and/or legal health record.   
• Should the participant continue to be unreachable, they will be considered to have 
withdrawn from the clinical trial with a primary reason of lost to follow-up. 
5.0 STUDY INTERVENTION  
5.1 
Description 
Pharmacokinetics and Psilocybin Effects 
Psilocybin is detectable in plasma 20 to 40 minutes after oral administration of 0.224 
mg/kg (10-20mg total dose) (Hasler et al., 1997). Orally ingested psilocybin is 
metabolized in the liver, and primarily transformed into the active hydroxyl metabolite, 
psilocin. Psilocybin is essentially a prodrug and psilocin represents the pharmacologically 
active agent in systemic circulation. The elimination half-life of psilocybin is 50 minutes 
(Lindenblatt et al., 1998). Psilocin’s half-life ranges between 2 and 3 hours and it 
detectable 6 hours after oral administration (Hasler et al., 1997; Hasler et al., 2004; 
Lindenblatt et al., 1998). Both psilocin and psilocybin are detectable in human urine, 
unmodified and particularly conjugated with glucuronic acid(Hasler et al., 2002). The 
majority of psilocybin recovered in urine is excreted within 3 hours after oral administration 
and is completely eliminated from the body within 24 hours (Hasler et al., 2002).  
 
As a 5HT2A/2C agonist, psilocin is regarded as a “classical” psychedelic; in humans, it 
commonly elicits significantly altered states of consciousness, experienced through visual 
and sometimes auditory effects, changes in perception, distortions of time, and a range 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
27 
of effects including a sense of awe, novel perspectives, existential and personal insight, 
dramatically heightened empathy and feelings of compassion, strong emotions, and non-
dual or unitive experience. A number of these ‘peak’ experiences have been associated 
with improved quality of life and improvement in mood (Griffiths et al., 2016; McClain et 
al., 2003; Visser et al., 2010). For a more detailed explanation on the effects of psilocybin 
and its mechanism of action, please refer to the investigators brochure.  
 
Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy 
All participants will receive manualized psychotherapy in conjunction to their assigned 
pharmacological treatment. The participant will attend 1 preparatory session that occurs 
within 7-days of the first psilocybin dosing session (V3) to develop a therapeutic alliance, 
set intentions for the experience, and learn what to expect during the dosing session. In 
addition, the participant will undergo 2 integrative therapy sessions after the intervention 
(V4 & V5).  
There will be an experienced clinical psychologist trained in PAP serving as a master 
trainer for the study. We will also use the Yale psilocybin-assisted therapy for depression 
manual to deliver psychotherapy and train each therapist (see manual attached). The 
therapy is closely related to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, with a focus on 
“psychological flexibility” i.e. a person’s ability to: 1) adapt to fluctuating situational 
demands; 2) reconfigure mental resources; 3) shift perspective; and 4) balance 
competing desires, needs, and life domains. The therapists’ role is to witness the 
participant’s therapeutic process and provide unconditional positive regard during the 
experience.  
Therapy sessions will not be video recorded. A delegated physician will be available at 
all times during the dosage session to assess and manage any medical or psychiatric 
adverse events.  
 
How the study intervention will appear: 
The psilocybin will be provided by Filament Health Corporation (BC, Canada). The dose 
of psilocybin used in this study will be 25mg. The psilocybin will be administered in size 
2 hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), white capsules.  
5.2 
Treatment Regimen 
There will be one intervention day (V3 – Day 0) following Baseline (V2) and after the 
participant has been deemed eligible to participate. The procedures are outlined below: 
 
Each participant will be assigned 1 treatment bottle containing 1 capsule of 25mg 
psilocybin. Under the supervision of a clinician, the 25 mg capsule of psilocybin will be 
taken orally with a glass of water. There will be no modifications to the dosage, each 
participant will receive the same dosage of psilocybin. In addition to the psilocybin, two 
study therapists trained in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy will be supporting the 
participant during the dosing session. There will be 1 therapist present at all times 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
28 
throughout the dosing session. The total treatment time will be 5-6 hours when the acute 
effects of the psilocybin have passed. 
5.3 
Method for Assigning Participants to Treatment Groups 
All participants will be allocated to the 25 mg psilocybin group. The research pharmacist 
will dispense medication on the day of dosing.  
5.4 
Administration of Study Intervention 
The IP will be prepared by the CAMH pharmacy and picked up by a trained research staff 
member. The IP will be given to the participant by a trained therapist who will supervise 
the participant. The participant will receive a capsule containing 25mg of psilocybin which 
will be taken orally, with water. The capsule should not be opened or chewed. 
  
After taking the IP, the participant will lie down on a bed in a non-clinical environment. 
Therapists will encourage participants to focus their attention inward and stay with any 
experience that arises. To enhance inward reflect, a pre-selected music playlist will be 
played quietly. Two study therapists trained in PAP will be supporting each participant 
during the dosing session with at least one therapist being present at all times to respond 
to the emotional and physical needs of the participant. Constant observation by therapists 
will monitor for adverse events during the dosing sessions. At least one member of the 
dyad will be a clinician. An on-call psychiatrist will be available at all times to further 
assess as needed for acute concerns. 
 
The effects of psilocybin usually start about 20 to 30 minutes after administration, 
becoming the most intense in the first 90 to 120 minutes and gradually subsiding in 5 to 
6 hours. The participants will be asked to remain in the room for the duration of the 
session regardless of the intensity of the effects, preferably lying down and mostly silent 
unless they have a concern or need to communicate a discomfort or seek reassurance 
from the therapist, or use the restroom. The therapists will ‘check-in’ with the participant 
(i.e., ask how the participant is doing) in 30 to 60 minute intervals post-dosing. Light 
snacks will be provided, but participants are encouraged to bring in their own lunch.  
 
About 5 to 6 hours after dosing, the trained therapists will discuss the IP administration 
experience with the participant. The participant will be discharged 5-6 hours post-dosing 
when, in the opinion of the investigator, the acute effects of psilocybin are resolved. The 
participant must be accompanied home by a caregiver who will remain with the participant 
for up to 24hrs after the intervention was given.  
5.5 
Participant Compliance Monitoring 
The IP will be administered to the participant in front of study personnel. Thus, 
administration of the IP will be supervised by study personnel to ensure compliance.  
5.6 
Concomitant Therapy 
All prescription and non-prescription medications (e.g. over-the-counter drugs and herbal 
supplements) that participants report taking during the 30 days prior to Screening (V1) 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
29 
will be assessed and recorded at V1. For each medication, documentation should list the 
trade or generic name, the total daily dose including units (or the dose, units, and 
scheduled and actual frequency of administration if the medication is not taken daily), the 
route of administration, and the reason for use. Where applicable, medication reports 
should be corroborated with participant medical records. All as-needed (pro re nata, PRN) 
prescriptions should be converted to reflect the actual number of pills or dose taken per 
day. 
 
Concomitant medication refers to all drugs and therapies used from the time the ICF is 
signed through until the end of study participation. 
Changes, additions, 
or 
discontinuations to medications and/or therapy will be assessed, recorded, and verified 
with participants in the CRF during each study visit.  
 
Permissible Medications 
Medications for the management of concurrent anxiety and insomnia, or non-psychiatric 
medications that have a potential psychotropic effect are permitted within the following 
limitations. 
 
For the initial Screening Visit (V1) through to the final study visit (V8), participants are 
permitted to use benzodiazepines (up to 2mg of lorazepam equivalent per day for 
insomnia and anxiety if it is not taken within 12 hours before the psilocybin dose (V3). 
Prescription and nonprescription medications with psychoactive properties that are used 
as needed for non-psychiatric conditions (e.g. pseudoephedrine for allergies or cold, 
zopiclone for sleep disorders) should be used no more than 2 times a week and not within 
12 hours before any study assessment. Documentation of the use of adjunctive 
anxiolytics, hypnotics, or medication with potential psychotropic properties (including 
over-the-counter preparations) will be obtained at each visit.  
 
Participants will be required to continue with their corresponding treatment for their 
chronic neuropathic pain disorder as prescribed by their chronic pain physicians. 
Participants will be asked to remain on stable doses of ongoing pain medications for 2 
weeks prior and during the trial. Investigators will analyze all medications taken by the 
participants prior to the intervention as well as at each follow-up.  
 
 
Permissible Contraceptive Methods 
A woman/female or person who is not of childbearing potential is considered to be 
postmenopausal after at least 12 months without menstruation. The participant must be 
on a permissible contraceptive for a minimum of 3 months prior to screening and for the 
duration of the study. The following methods of contraception, if used properly and used 
for the duration of the study, are permissible: 
 
• Combine 
estrogen-and 
progestogen-containing 
hormonal 
contraception 
associated with inhibition of ovulation: 
o Oral 
o Intravaginal 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
30 
o Transdermal 
• Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: 
o Oral 
o Injectable 
o Implantable 
• Intrauterine device 
• Intrauterine hormone-releasing system 
• Bilateral tubual occlusion 
• Vasectomized partner 
• Sexual abstinence 
• Tubal ligation/ occlusion 
 
Periodic abstinence (e.g. calendar, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) is not an 
acceptable form of contraception for this study. 
 
These methods of contraception also apply to partners of male participants.  
 
The investigator (or delegate) and each participant will determine the appropriate method 
of contraception for the participant during the participation in the study. This will be 
documented at Screening (V1). 
 
Prohibited Medications 
Participants are to be discontinued from antidepressants and/or antipsychotic 
medications at least 2 weeks prior to Baseline (V2). Participants on fluoxetine will be 
taped off the medication at least 4-weeks prior to Baseline (V2). Additional time may be 
required as determined by the study investigator. Medications that must be discontinued 
include the following 2 classes of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) 
Classification System: NO5A Antipsychotics & NO6A Antidepressants. Methylphenidate 
is also included in this list. 
 
These medications should not be re-introduced until after month 3 (V8) when the study is 
complete. If the medications are re-introduced, the study investigator must be notified and 
the medications will be documented in the participant’s CRF. Participants who require 
concomitant medication(s) specifically for the treatment of depression at any time through 
the duration of the study will be assessed for reasons of resuming their medications. 
 
 
Rescue Medication 
The decision to medicate a participant will depend on if the therapists and study 
investigator determine the safety of the patient and others can be maintained without 
medical intervention. The final decision will be made by the study investigator. 
• Benzodiazepine anxiolytics 
o The preferred pharmacological intervention of choice in case of acute 
psychological distress (e.g. medications such as lorazepam or alprazolam 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
31 
that have a rapid onset, a short time until peak plasma concentration, and 
a short duration of therapeutic action).  
o The oral route is preferable because IV injection procedures may further 
exacerbate the participant’s anxiety. 
• Antipsychotic medications (e.g. risperidone) should be available in the event that 
an adverse reaction escalates to unmanageable psychosis.  
• Management of blood pressure: 
o Asymptomatic with blood pressure (BP) < 180/100 
 Reassure, ensure lights are dim or off, tilt head of bed 15 degrees up 
and continue to monitor 
 Increase blood pressure measurement frequency to q15min until BP 
has partly normalized (sBP = 100-159; dBP = 60-99)  
o Asymptomatic with BP >180/100 for >30 minutes 
 Administer captopril* 12.5mg PO/SL x 1 with MD order 
 Increase blood pressure measurement frequency to q15min until BP has 
partly normalized (sBP = 100-159; dBP = 60-99)  
o Asymptomatic with BP persisting at >180/100 for >60 minutes post-dose, 
despite administering first captopril dose: 
 Consider potential transfer to ER – decision to be made by study 
investigator 
 Administer 2nd dose of captopril 12.5mg x 1 with MD order 
o Management of severe treatment emergent hypertension: 
 Consider potential transfer to ER – decision to be made by study 
investigator 
 Administer captopril 25mg PO/SL x 1  
 Call 911 immediately for patients experiencing symptoms of a 
hypertensive crisis (e.g., chest paint, shortness of breath) or 
hypertensive encephalopathy (e.g., sudden severe headache, visual 
disturbances, 
seizures, diminished 
consciousness, or focal 
neurological deficit) 
o Note: if there are contraindications to captopril, substitute for hydralazine 
10mg PO 
 
In case of development 
of acute anxiety or psychotic symptoms requiring 
pharmacological intervention, the participant will be managed under the care of the onsite 
psychiatrist. The participant may be discharged from the clinic when, in the opinion of the 
investigator, the condition has stabilized. The participant will be accompanied home. The 
participant is to notify the site when they have returned home safely. In the absence of 
receiving a phone call, site staff will directly contact the participant.  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
32 
Information for how to manage subjects during difficult psychological states are detailed 
in the Yale Manual for Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy of Depression. All therapists will 
undergoing training with the study investigator using this manual. 
5.7 
Packaging 
The psilocybin will be provided by Filament Health Corporation (British Columbia, 
Canada). The dose of psilocybin used in this study will be 25mg. Filament Health 
Corporation will provide extra 20% of the capsules needed. The entire shipment for this 
trial will be sent in bulk. Psilocybin capsules will be packaged individually in high-density 
polyethylene bottles (30cc). The dose for each participant will be stored in individual 
boxes labelled with the protocol number, trial name, lot number, unique box number, and 
a statement that the drug is for clinical use only. The IP will only be removed from the 
safe for one participant at a time on the day of their session. Filament Health Corporation 
will be sent safety reports via email within 24 hours of team awareness.  
5.8 
Blinding of Study Intervention 
N/A 
5.9 
Receiving, Storage, Dispensing and Return 
5.9.1 
Receipt of Study Intervention Supplies 
Upon receipt of the study intervention supplies, an inventory will be performed and a 
receipt log filled out and signed by the person accepting the shipment. Designated 
research staff/pharmacy must count and verify that the shipment contains all the items 
noted in the shipment inventory.  Any damaged or unusable study intervention in a given 
shipment (active drug or comparator) will be documented in the clinical trial files.   
5.9.2 
Storage 
All IP will be kept in a locked area with limited access. The high-density polyethylene 
(HDPE) bottles of IP are to be stored as indicated in the investigators brochure. Bottles 
must be maintained at room temperature in a locked, secure location within research 
pharmacy. Deviations of storage temperature outside this required range should be 
documented and the study investigator should be notified immediately. Bottles of IP 
should not be frozen. If any component of the IP is damaged, the PI must be notified 
immediately. Any storage deviations will be reported to the REB as a protocol deviation.  
5.9.3 
Dispensing of Study Intervention 
All participants will receive the same intervention. Each participant will be assigned 1 
treatment bottle containing 1 capsule of 25mg of psilocybin. The IP will be dispensed and 
administered to the participants only by an appropriately qualified study physician. The 
study intervention will be administered orally, with water. Capsules should not be opened 
or chewed. 
 
The investigator must keep an accurate accounting of the number of IP delivered to the 
site, administered to participants, and destroyed during and at the completion of the study. 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
33 
The IP is to be used in accordance with the protocol by participants. The study team, 
overseen by the PI, should maintain records that adequately document that the 
participants were administered the IP dose specified by the protocol.  
 
Regular study intervention reconciliation will be performed to document study intervention 
assigned, consumed, and remaining. This reconciliation will be logged on an 
accountability log (i.e. drug accountability log), and signed and dated by delegated 
research and/or pharmacy staff. 
5.9.4 
Return or Destruction of Study Intervention 
At the completion of the clinical trial, there will be a final reconciliation of the study 
intervention shipped, consumed and remaining. This reconciliation will be logged on an 
accountability form, and signed and dated by delegated research and/or pharmacy staff.  
Any discrepancies noted will be investigated, resolved, and documented prior to 
destruction of unused study intervention. Intervention destroyed on site will be 
documented in the clinical trial’s files. 
6.0 RESEARCH PROCEDURES 
6.1 
Research Visits 
Description of Measures 
 
Screening Measures 
 
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). The SCID-5 is a semi-structured 
diagnostic interview for ascertaining DSM-5 diagnoses (First, 2015). It will be 
administered by a trained study staff member.  
 
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HamD-17). HamD-17 is a clinician-rated measure of 
depressive symptoms that consists of 17 items rated using a semi-structured interview. 
Eight of the 17 items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=absent; 1=doubtful or mild; 2=mild 
to moderate; 3=moderate to severe; 4=very severe), while the remaining 9 items are rated 
on a 3-point scale (0=absent; 1=doubtful or mild; 2=clearly present), yielding a minimum 
total score of 0 (least severe) and a maximum score of 52 (most severe) (Hamilton, 1960).  
 
Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS). The LANSS is a two 
part (A and B), 7 item questionnaire that aims to identify the presence of neuropathic pain. 
Each item is rated between 3-5 points for yes and 0 points for no, with a total maximum 
score of 24. A score of 12 or above indicating the presence of neuropathic pain (Bennett, 
2001).  
 
 
Safety Measures 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
34 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): The C-SSRS will be used to assess 
suicide potential or tendency as a study entry criteria and monitored throughout the study 
to help rapidly identify this potential serious adverse event and intervene appropriately 
(e.g. further specialized assessment and hospitalization if needed). The C-SSRS is a 
semi-structured, clinician-rated interview designed to assess the severity and intensity of 
suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior over a 
specified time period. The measurement of suicidal ideation is based on 5 “yes” or “no” 
questions with accompanying descriptions arranged in order of increasing severity. If the 
patient answers “yes” to either questions 1 or 2, the intensity of ideation is assessed in 5 
additional questions related to frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons 
for the most severe suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior is assessed by asking questions 
categorizing behaviors into actual, aborted, and interrupted attempts; preparatory 
behavior; and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior. If any item(s) on the C-SSRS are 
answered “yes”, the primary investigator or physician investigator must review the 
patient’s responses in order to: 
(a) During washout period and Baseline determine the patient’s study eligibility and 
potential need for referral to a mental health professional, and  
(b) During the study evaluate the patient’s need for appropriate medical management such as 
a referral to a mental health professional.  
 
Outcome Measures: 
 
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Intensity Scale 
(PROMIS-PI) is a single item questionnaire that aims to identify the intensity of pain 
experienced by the participant in the past seven days. Presented on a visual analogue 
scale of 0-10, scores range from 0= no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. A score of 5 or 
greater indicates moderate to severe pain intensity(Karayannis et al., 2017).  
 
 
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference Scale 
(Short Form) (PROMIS-Interference). This is a six-item questionnaire which aims to 
identify how much an individual’s physical pain has interfered with emotional, social and 
cognitive domains of living. All six items are rated on a scale of 1-5, with 1= Not at all, 2= 
A little, 3=somewhat, 4=quite a bit, 5=very much. Raw scores are converted to T-scores 
with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10. A T-score greater than 50 indicates higher pain 
interference than the general population (Amtmann et al., 2010; Bingham et al., 2021).  
 
 
Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). The CGI is a brief observer-rated instrument that 
measures the clinician’s view of the patient’s global functioning prior to and after initiating 
a study medication. It consists of two one-items measures that evaluate 1) severity of 
psychopathology from 1 (‘normal – not at all ill, symptoms of disorder not present in the 
past seven days’) to 7 (‘among the most extremely ill patients – pathology drastically 
interferes in many life functions;) and 2) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
35 
seven-point scale (1 = ‘very much improved’ and 7 = ‘very much worse’). It has been used 
in both research and clinical practice (Busner & Targum, 2007).  
 
Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale. The GAD-7 is a brief self-report 
measure of generalised anxiety, it consists of 7 items rated from 0 (‘not at all sure’) to 3 
(‘nearly every day’). It has good psychometric properties and is a widely used research 
instrument in assessing adult anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006).  
 
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS;(Montgomery & Asberg, 1979)). 
The MADRS is a clinician-rated measure of severity of depressive symptoms. It consists 
of 10-items rated from 0 to 6. It is one of the most widely used clinician-rated 
assessments of depressive severity with well-established psychometric properties.   
 
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scales (SHAPS). The SHAPS is a 14-item self-report scale 
that measures hedonic capacity. Participants are asked to rate themselves on a Likert 
scale from 0 (‘strongly disagree’) to 3 (‘strongly agree’). It is both a reliable and valid 
measure that is frequently used in research and clinical settings (Snaith et al., 1995). 
 
Stanford Expectancy of Treatment (SETS). The SETS is an instrument to measure 
positive and negative treatment expectancies in clinical trials. It contains two subscales 
for both negative and positive expectancies. There are 6-items which are participant 
rated from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’. Items 7 to 10 are direct questions 
asked to the participant (Younger et al., 2012). 
 
 
World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire – Brief Version (WHO-QoL – 
Bref). This 26-item, self-report measure was developed by the WHO in order to assess 
quality of life in the following areas: physical, psychological, level of independence, social 
relationships, environment, and spirituality/religion/personal beliefs. Responses are rated 
on a 5-point Likert scale rating from 1 = (not at all, over poor, very dissatisfied, never) 
through to 5 = (very good, very satisfied, an extreme amount, completely, always).  
 
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). The WEMWBS consists of a 
12-item scale used to assess the mental wellbeing of people. The self-report scale 
consists of positively worded statements covering feelings and functioning aspects of 
mental wellbeing. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (‘none of 
the time’) to 5 (‘all of the time’).  
 
Five Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC). The 5D-ASC is a visual 
analogue scale of 94-items that consists of five subscales: 1) oceanic boundlessness; 2) 
anxious ego dissolution; 3) visionary re-structuralization; 4) auditory alterations; 5) 
reduction of vigilance (Dittrich, 1998; Studerus et al., 2010). It is well validated and widely 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
36 
used to characterize the subjective effects of psychedelic drugs. This self-rated scale 
appears as at 10-item Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10.  
 
Mystical Experiences Questionnaire (MEQ). The MEQ is a 30-item self-report measure 
that has been used to assess the experience after psilocybin administration. The scale 
consists of four factors: 1) mystical; 2) positive Mood; 3) transcendence of time and space 
and 4) ineffability. Responses are rated on a 6-point Likert scale rating from 0 = (none; 
not at all) through to 5 = (extreme). 
 
 
Outline of Study Procedures 
 
Visit 1 (V1) – Screening Visit   
o Administered by trained study staff: 
 Informed consent 
 Review of medical history, family medical history, and demographics 
 ATHF 
 SCID-5 
 HamD-17 
  LANSS 
 Vital Signs (blood pressure, pulse) 
 Height and weight 
o Clinician administered: 
 Review of prior and current medications; the participant will be tapered 
from prohibited medications (see Section 5.6), if any, under the 
supervision of the study clinician 
• The study clinician will discuss options of tapering off 
medications with the participant and their healthcare provider.  
• Participants will be given a choice of how quickly they would like 
to come off the medications, but participants must be off 
concomitant medications (see Section 5.6) at least 2 weeks 
prior to the Baseline Visit (V2). Some medications may require a 
longer tapering period.  
 Review of eligibility criteria, medical history, and family medical history 
 Review of assessments 
 Documentation of contraceptive method to be used by the participant 
o Biological specimen collection and laboratory evaluations collected at the Queen 
Street CAMH laboratory:  
 Clinical laboratory tests: 
• Approximately 20 mL blood will be drawn to conduct the 
following evaluations: 
• Haematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, 
mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, mean 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
37 
corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, white blood cell count 
(with differential), and platelet count. 
• Chemistry: albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine 
aminotransferase (ALT), amylase, aspartate aminotransferase 
(AST), bicarbonate, bilirubin (direct, indirect, and total), calcium, 
chloride, creatine kinase, creatinine, gammaGT, glucose, 
lactate, dehydrogenase, lipase, magnesium, phosphate, 
potassium, protein-total, sodium, urea (blood urea nitrogen), 
and uric acid. 
 Urine Samples: 
• Urinalysis: a dipstick urinalysis will be performed for blood, 
glucose, ketone, protein, pH, specific gravity, nitrite, leukocytes, 
bilirubin, and urobilinogen 
• Urine drug screen: for illicit drugs or drugs of abuse. Results of 
a positive drug screen will be reviewed by the study clinician for 
pattern of use.  
• Urine pregnancy test for all women of childbearing potential 
 ECG: Standard 12-lead ECG to check heart function 
 
 
 
 
Washout Period: Minimum of 2-Weeks  
Participants who are on concomitant medications (Section 5.6) must be tapered off at 
least 2 weeks prior to Baseline (V2). The plan for tapering off medications will be 
determined at the first screening visit (V1) with the participant and the study physician. 
Participants who are not on any prohibited medications will still undergo a two week 
period between Screen (V1) and Baseline (V2). During the washout period, the study 
physician will have weekly appointments with the participant to check how they are 
doing and ensure they are safe. The weekly appointments can be scheduled in-person 
or remote (via telephone/WebEx) based on the participant’s preference and at the 
discretion of the study physician. Participants will be assessed for suicidality with the C-
SSRS, changes in pain intensity and interference via the PROMIS-PI and PROMI-
Interference, and assessed for adverse events and serious adverse events at each 
contact/visit. 
 
Any safety, pain and AE/SAE assessment visits during the washout period will be called 
V1a, V1b, etc. During these visits, the C-SSRS, the PROMIS-PI, the PROMIS-
Interference, AE/SAE monitoring and any changes in medications since the previous 
visit will be obtained in addition to other assessments at the study clinician’s discretion.  
 
 
Visit 2 (V2) - Baseline Visit  - Day -7 to Day -1 
The Baseline visit (V2) will occur approximately 3-6 weeks after the initial Screening 
(V1) when the participant has successfully been tapered off any concomitant 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
38 
medication. At the Baseline Visit (V2), the participant’s eligibility will be confirmed by the 
study investigator by reviewing the Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria (Section 4.4) and 
updating the medical history. The Baseline visit (V2) can occur within 7 days before the 
anticipated psilocybin session and may be split over multiple days to reduce the burden 
on the participant (additional study visits will be labelled V2a, V2b etc). The following 
procedures will be performed and recorded at the Baseline visit (V2): 
o Administered by trained study staff: 
 Vital Signs (blood pressure, heart rate) 
 GAD-7 
 MADRS 
 SETS 
 SHAPS 
 WHOQOL-BREF 
 WEMWBS 
 PROMIS-PI 
 PROMIS-Interference 
o Clinician administered: 
 C-SSRS 
 CGI 
 Confirmation of eligibility criteria  
 Review of assessments administered 
o Preparatory session (up to 4 hours) with the study therapists which will involve 
building a therapeutic alliance, psychoeducation about the psychedelic experience, 
and setting intentions for the intervention.  
 Note: Therapists will have the option to schedule an additional 
preparatory session at their discretion.  
 For a more detailed explanation of the preparatory therapy session, 
please refer to the Yale Manual for Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy of 
Depression. 
 
 
Visit 3 (V3) – Intervention – Day 0  
The intervention will occur the day after Baseline (V2). The participant may have this 
session ≤7 days following the Baseline visit (V2). If the participant is out of the ≤7 day 
window, all baseline assessments are to be repeated. On the day of the intervention the 
following procedures will take place: 
o Study intervention administration (Section 5.0): 1 oral dose of 25mg of psilocybin 
administered in conjunction with supportive therapy (PAP).  
o Vital signs (body temperature, blood pressure and pulse) will be taken three times 
during this session (Once pre-dosing, once 3 hours after dosing and once at the 
end of dosing session) and documented in the data collection form.  
o  
o At least one therapist will be present in the room at all times during PAP and be 
available to respond to participants’ physical and emotional needs 
o Participants will be instructed to lie on a bed in a non-clinical environment, and 
therapists will encourage participants to focus their attention inward and stay with 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
39 
any experience that arises. To enhance inward reflection, a pre-selected music 
playlist will be played. Administration of questionnaires or other instruments to be 
completed at the end of the dosing session when the acute effects of psilocybin 
have resolved:  
 Study team or therapist administered: 
• 5D-ASC and MEQ to assess the acute drug effects using 5 
primary dimensions and respective sub dimensions after 5 hours 
of dose administration.  
• C-SSRS 
o The participant will be discharged 5-6 hours post-dosing when, in the opinion of the 
study PI (or delegate), the acute effects of psilocybin are resolved. The participant 
must be accompanied home by a caregiver who will remain with them for up to 
24hrs after the dose was administered. 
o Rescue medications are permitted during this visit as outlined in Section 5.6.  
 
Visit 4 & Visit 5 (V4 & V5) – Post-Intervention – Day 1 & Day 7 
o Administered by trained study staff or therapist/clinician: 
 CSSRS 
 CGI 
 MADRS 
 SHAPS 
 PROMIS-PI 
 PROMIS-Interference 
 
o Integrative psychotherapy session will occur with the study therapists. The 
participant will discuss their experience during the dose session including their 
thoughts, feelings, and experiences. For more detailed information on the 
integrative therapy sessions, please refer to the therapists manual (Yale Manual for 
Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy of Depression). 
 
 
Visit 6 (V6), Visit 7 (V7) & Visit 8 (V8) – Follow-Up: Week 2, Month 1 & Month 3 
Follow-up visits occur at Weeks 2 (V6), 3 (V7), and 4 (V8) after the intervention. The 
following assessments will occur at each visit: 
o Administered by trained study staff or therapist/clinician: 
 CSSRS 
 CGI 
 GAD-7 (except Visit 7) 
 MADRS 
 SHAPS  
 PROMIS-PI 
 PROMIS-Interference 
 WHOQOL-BREF (except Visit 7) 
 WEMWBS (except Visit 7) 
o Clinician administered: 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
40 
 Review of safety assessments 
o These scales will be administered in-person and/or via secure videoconference 
software (alternatives to in-person for COVID-19 or other travel restrictions). Study 
visits will be coordinated along with follow-up with the study psychiatrists to provide 
added security and screening for suicidality. All scales (both self-report and 
clinician-rated) will be administered using a tablet with the secure digital REDCap 
platform for results to be safely and instantly loaded to the study database, with 
paper versions available if there are technological difficulties. 
 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
41 
6.2 
Schedule of Events 
 
Procedures 
Screening (Visit 1) 
Washout period1 
(3-6 weeks) 
Baseline2 (Visit 2, 
Day -7 to Day -1) 
Intervention (Visit 
3, Day 0) 
1-Day Post-
Intervention (Visit 4, 
Day 1) 
1-Week Post-
Intervention (Visit 5, 
Day 7) 
2-Weeks Post-
Intervention (Visit 6, 
Day 14) 
4-Weeks Post-
Intervention (Visit 7, 
Day 30) 
3-months Post-
intervention (Visit 8, 
Day 90) 
Location of Visit 
Clinic 
Remote 
Clinic 
Clinic 
Clinic 
Clinic 
Remote 
Remote 
Remote 
Allowable Window 
 
Weekly 
 
±7 days from 
Baseline 
None
 
±3 day 
±3 day 
±3 day 
±3 day 
Informed Consent 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical history 
✔ 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior/concomitant medication 
review 
✔ 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Review 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ATHF 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CGI 
 
 
✔ 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
CSSRS3 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
HamD-17 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MADRS 
 
 
✔ 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
SCID-5 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse) 
✔ 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
Weight 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Height 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ECG 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Clinical laboratory tests4 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Urinalysis 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Urine drug screening 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0  
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
42 
Urine pregnancy test5 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Documentation of birth control 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preparatory/Integrative therapy & 
psychoeducation6 
 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
 
 
 
Intervention (25mg of psilocybin) 
 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
Adverse event and serious adverse 
event review and evaluation 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
CRF completion 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
5D-ASC7 
 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
MEQ 
 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
GAD-7 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
✔ 
 
✔ 
SETS 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SHAPS 
 
 
✔ 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
WEMWBS 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
✔ 
 
✔ 
WHO-QOL-BREF 
 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
✔ 
 
✔ 
LANSS 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PROMIS-PI 
 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
PROMIS-Interference 
 
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
1. 
Additional visits may be needed during the w ashout period to ensure adequate time for discontinuation of medication. Visits w ill occur on a w eekly basis 
during this period (V1a, V1b, etc.). Review  of medications and assessments for suicidality w ill occur in addition to other assessments at the discretion of 
the study investigator. 
2. 
Baseline assessments can occur on separate days (-7 days from first dose) to reduce the burden on participants. These visits w ill be V2a, V2b etc. 
3. 
The “Last 12 Months” version w ill be administered at Visit 1A and the “Since Last Visit” version w ill be administered at all other visits.  
4. 
See Section 6.0: Research Procedures for complete list of required laboratory tests to be performed. 
5. 
For w omen/females and people of child-bearing age only 
6. 
Additional therapy visits may be scheduled at the discretion of the study therapists and/or the study investigator. 
7. 
To be administered immediately after the acute effects of psilocybin have subsided. 
 
Instruments: 
ATHF: Antidepressant Treatment History Form; CGI: Clinical Global Impression; CSSRS: Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale; ECG: Electrocardiogram; GAD-
7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder assessment form; HamD-17: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MADRS: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; SCID-5: 
Structured Clinical Interview  for DSM-5; SETS: Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale; SHAPS: Snaith Hamilton Anhedonia Scale; WEMWBS: Warw ick-
Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale; WHO-QoL-BREF: World Health Organization Quality of Life abbreviated scale; 5D-ASC: 5-Dimensional Altered States of 
Consciousness Rating Scale. 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
43 
7.0 STATISTICAL PLAN 
7.1 
Sample Size Determination 
Sample size was based upon the rule of 12 for pilot studies (Julious, 2005). 
 
Using an effect size of d=2 and 1% significance will require N=12 completers to achieve 
95% power. This calculation is for a single-arm design (2-sided) assuming a Wilcoxon 
Signed Rank Test. This sample size is also sufficient to detect large correlations (r=0.7) 
between change scores with 5% significance and 80% power. We expect a dropout rate 
of 25%, and will recruit 16 participants to account for this.  
 
 
7.2 
Statistical Methods 
In this pilot study, we will estimate rates and percentages for feasibility outcomes, along 
with lower one-sided 95% CIs where high percentages are desirable (e.g., enrollment 
rate) and upper one-sided CIs where low percentages are desirable (e.g., loss to follow-
up). For clinical outcomes, statistical analysis will be descriptive in nature. Continuous 
data will be reported as means with standard deviations, or as medians and interquartile 
ranges if data is skewed. Categorical data will be reported as counts and percentages. 
Since this study is a pilot trial, its sample size is not designed to provide the statistical 
power to detect clinically meaningful differences in outcomes. Therefore, we will not 
formally test for statistical differences between baseline and follow-up visits; rather, 
estimates of will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. 
 
 
8.0 SAFETY AND ADVERSE EVENTS 
8.1 
Definitions 
Adverse Event 
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a research participant 
administered an investigational product and which does not necessarily have a causal 
relationship with this treatment. An adverse event (AE) can therefore be any unfavorable 
and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease 
temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not 
related to the investigational product.   
 
AE severity can be defined as: 
• 
Mild: discomfort noticed but no disruption of normal activity 
• 
Moderate: discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity 
• 
Severe: interferes significantly with the participant’s normal activity or course of illness 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
44 
 
Serious Adverse Event 
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that is:  
• Fatal; 
• Life-threatening; 
• Requires or prolongs hospital stay; 
• Results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; 
• A congenital anomaly or birth defect; or 
• An important medical event (events that may not be life threatening but are of major 
clinical significance, such as a drug overdose or seizure that did not result in in-patient 
hospitalization).  
 
Adverse Drug Reactions 
An adverse drug reaction is any noxious, unintended or undesirable response to a 
medicinal product related to any dose.  
 
Unexpected Adverse Reactions 
An adverse reaction, the nature or severity of which is not consistent with the applicable 
product information (e.g. Investigator’s Brochure).  
 
Adverse Event Collection Period 
AEs occurring as of the first administered dose of the study intervention and 30 days after 
the last administered dose, or for a follow-up period of at least five half-lives of the study 
intervention will be collected. AEs recorded during this period will be followed through to 
resolution, or until the event is assessed as chronic or stable.  
 
Preexisting Condition 
A preexisting condition is one that is present at the start of the clinical trial.  A preexisting 
condition will be recorded as an adverse event if the frequency, intensity, or the character 
of the condition worsens during the study period. At the Screening Visit (V1), any clinically 
significant abnormality will be recorded as a preexisting condition in the participant’s CRF. 
Where applicable and at the consent of the participant, additional information from the 
participant’s healthcare provider including medical records, may be requested. 
Throughout the clinical trial, any new clinically significant findings/abnormalities that meet 
the definition of an adverse event will also be recorded and documented as an adverse 
event.  
 
Post-study Adverse Event 
At the last scheduled visit, the PI and/or QI should instruct each participant to report any 
subsequent event(s) that the participant believes might reasonably be related to 
participation in this clinical trial.  The PI and/or QI should notify Health Canada of any 
death or adverse event (meeting reporting criteria) occurring at any time after a participant 
has discontinued or terminated participation that may reasonably be related to this clinical 
trial.  Health Canada and Filament Health Corporation should also be notified if the PI 
and/or QI should become aware of the development of cancer or of a congenital anomaly 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
45 
in a subsequently conceived offspring of a participant that was involved in this clinical 
trial.  
 
Abnormal Laboratory Values 
A clinical laboratory abnormality should be documented as an adverse event if any one 
of the following conditions are met:  
• The laboratory abnormality is not otherwise refuted by a repeat test to confirm the 
abnormality; 
• The abnormality suggests a disease and/or organ toxicity; 
• The abnormality is of a degree that requires active management (e.g. change of dose, 
discontinuation of the study intervention, more frequent follow-up assessments, further 
diagnostic investigation, etc.); or 
• Any laboratory abnormalities assessed as being clinically significant by a study 
physician or qualified individual. 
8.2 
Recording of Adverse Events 
All adverse events occurring during the study period must be recorded. At each contact 
with the research participant, the research team must seek information on adverse events 
by specific questioning.  Information on all adverse events should be recorded 
immediately in the participant’s CRF and/or legal health record, and recorded in the 
adverse event log. All adverse events will be assessed the PI for relatedness, 
expectedness, seriousness, and severity in relation to the study intervention. All clearly 
related signs, symptoms, and abnormal diagnostic procedure results should be recorded 
in the CRF and/or legal health record and assessed by the PI in a timely manner allowing 
sufficient time to meet required reporting timelines for SAEs and SUADRs (severe 
unexpected adverse drug reactions) if needed. Adverse events related to the study drug 
will be reported to Filament Health Corporation at the end of the study. These reports 
should not contain PHI. For a full outline of the information required in the report, please 
review the agreement with Filament.   
8.3 
Reporting of Serious Adverse Events 
8.3.1 
Investigator Reporting: Notifying the Sponsor 
There is no sponsor for this study, however Filament Health Corporation is the supplier 
of the psilocybin used in this trial. Filament Health Corporation will be sent safety reports 
as outlined in the ‘Investigational Drug Supply Agreement’ Safety reports on dosing 
information, AEs, and concomitant medications will be provided annually. Safety reports 
on demography, AEs, and concomitant medications will be provided at the end of the 
study. Safety reports on serious adverse events that have a causal relationship to the IP 
and on pregnancy will occur within 24hrs of the study team being notified. None of these 
safety reports will contain PHI and all data will be coded.  
8.3.2 
Investigator Reporting: Notifying the REB 
The process for notification to the REB for applicable serious adverse events (SAEs) must 
be completed as per REB reporting requirements. SAEs and unanticipated events must 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
46 
be recorded and reported to the REB in accordance with the REB’s reporting 
requirements and timelines. Copies of each report and documentation of REB notification 
and REB receipt/acknowledgement must be kept in the Investigator Study Binder. 
8.3.3 
Sponsor Reporting of SUADRs: Notifying Health Canada 
There is no sponsor for this study, thus the PI/QI is responsible for reporting the safety 
information to Health Canada as required. The SUADR report must be reported to 
Health Canada in the following cases: 
• Where the ADR is neither fatal nor life-threatening, within 15 days after becoming 
aware of the information 
• Where it is fatal or life-threatening, immediately where possible and, in any event, 
within 7 days after becoming aware of the information 
• And within 8 days after having informed Health Canada of the ADR, submit as 
complete as possible, a report which includes an assessment of the importance 
and implication of any findings.  
8.3.4 
Sponsor Reporting of SUADRs: Notifying Sites 
Not applicable. 
8.4 
Reporting of Device Deficiencies 
Not applicable. 
8.5 
Safety Management Plan 
Safety of the participants (including data confidentiality) and the scientific integrity of the 
project will be ensured by the research team led by the PI. Participant safety will be 
monitored at each study visit by asking the participant about their experience and about 
any adverse events from the last study visit. All adverse events will be reviewed by the 
study PI and reported to the REB and/or Health Canada in accordance with the regulatory 
guidelines as outlined by each entity. Adverse events will be recorded and/or reported as 
outlined in Section 8.2 and 8.3. Safety reports on dosing information, AEs, and 
concomitant medications will be provided annually. Safety reports on demography, AEs, 
and concomitant medications will be provided at the end of the study. Safety reports on 
serious adverse events that have a causal relationship to the IP and on pregnancy will 
occur within 24hrs of the study team being notified. None of these safety reports will 
contain PHI and all data will be coded. A description of the reporting procedures can be 
found in the agreement with Filament Health Corporation. The study team will also use a 
published Suicide Risk Management Protocol to assess and reduce suicide risk (Herbeck 
et al., 2015). Participants experiencing a serious adverse event will be immediately 
withdrawn from the study. In the case of increased suicidality, the study physician will 
conduct an urgent psychiatric assessment with the participant 
 
The study investigator and study team will meet regularly to review the accrued data, data 
confidentiality, recruitment, and participants complaints. Participant confidentiality will be 
maintained through the use of code numbers to identify all participants. All research 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
47 
records will be kept in a locked file and no participants will be identified in any published 
report.  
 
Participants may be removed from the study at the discretion of the PI. Reasons for 
possible withdrawal from the clinical trial are outlined in Section 4.7.1. 
 
Remote Assessment Safety Procedures 
All remote assessments will be conducted in a private room. The research team will not 
require identification from the participant as the research team will already be familiar with 
the participant and will be able to identify them visually through WebEx. The sessions 
occuring over WebEx or over the phone will not be recorded. If the assessment requires 
screen sharing, the individual administering the assessment will ensure that any 
documents or windows on the desktop containing PHI or personal information will be 
closed. The individual administering the assessment will also have access to necessary 
communication technology in order to communicate with relevant research supports or 
emergency services in case of an emergent situation. When sending invitations for 
remote assessments or communicating via email, the research team will limit personal 
information in all emails by avoiding full names ot direct identifiers in the subject line of 
the email or meeting invitation.  
8.6 
Unblinding Procedures 
N/A 
 
8.7 
Data and Safety Monitoring Board 
N/A  
9.0 CLINICAL TRIAL DISCONTINUATION AND 
CLOSURE 
9.1 
Clinical Trial Discontinuation 
This clinical trial may be temporarily suspended or prematurely terminated if there is 
sufficient reasonable cause (i.e. closure based on PI decision, sponsor/funder decision, 
REB or other oversight bodies’ decision; review of serious, unexpected and related AEs; 
noncompliance; futility). Notification, which includes the reason for study suspension or 
termination, will be provided by the suspending or terminating party to research 
participants, the PI, funding agency, CAMH, and regulatory authorities.  If the clinical trial 
is prematurely terminated or suspended, the PI will promptly inform research participants, 
the REB, and the sponsor, and will provide the reason(s) for the termination or 
suspension. All communication with participants for this purpose will go through REB 
review and approval.  Research participants will then be contacted, as applicable, and be 
informed of changes to the study visit schedule. 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
48 
10.0 DATA HANDLING AND RECORD KEEPING 
10.1 Source Documents & Case Report Forms 
Source data will be collected on paper data collection forms (i.e. source documentation). 
 
We will also collect health card information from all participants that will be securely 
transferred to ICES, which is a prescribed entity under section 45 of Ontario’s Personal 
Health Information Privacy Act that is permitted to collect personally identifiable 
information for the purposes health system management and evaluation without individual 
consent or research ethics approval. The purpose of this transfer will be to link the 
individual’s clinical data with health administrative databases to study long-term safety 
and efficacy outcomes. 
 
 
REDCap  
Data for this clinical trial will be managed using REDCap electronic case report forms. 
This system is maintained on central CAMH servers, with data backed up daily, and is 
supported by the Research Informatics department.  
10.2 Protocol Deviations 
No deviations from or changes to the protocol will be implemented without approval from 
the REB, unless to eliminate an immediate hazard to a participant. All study staff will 
monitor the study procedures to detect any potential protocol deviations. All potential 
protocol deviations will be reviewed by the study PI. The protocol deviation will be 
reported to the REB if any of the following criteria are met: 
• Deviations that, in the opinion of the PI, jeopardize the safety of research 
participants, or that jeopardize the research efficacy or data integrity 
• Any change in the approved process for obtaining consent 
• Any deviations that lead to a serious adverse event or unanticipated problem 
• Any unauthorized collection, use, or disclosure of personal health information (PHI) 
10.3 Record Retention 
Research records pertaining to this clinical trial will be retained for 15 years.  
10.4 Clinical Trial Registration 
In accordance with TCPS 2, a description of this trial will be registered on 
www.clinicaltrials.gov before the start of recruitment activities, and the content will be 
updated throughout the duration of the clinical trial. All results, including negative results 
should be entered at the completion of the clinical trial. 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
49 
11.0 STUDY MONITORING, AUDITING, AND 
INSPECTING 
11.1 Study Monitoring Plan 
Site monitoring is conducted to ensure that the rights and well-being of research 
participants are protected, the reported trial data are accurate, complete, and verifiable, 
and the conduct of the clinical trial is in compliance with the currently approved 
protocol/amendment(s), ICH GCP, and applicable regulatory requirement(s). Reference 
the study monitoring plan for specific monitoring information.  
11.2 Auditing and Inspecting  
The PI and site will permit study-related audits, and inspections by the REB, CAMH, 
sponsor, and applicable granting agencies or regulatory bodies, including access to all 
study-related documents (e.g. source documents, regulatory documents, data collection 
instruments, study data, etc.). The PI will ensure the capability for audits/inspections of 
applicable study-related facilities (e.g. research pharmacy, clinical laboratory, imaging 
facility, etc.).  
12.0 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
12.1 Research Ethics Board (REB) Approval 
Research Ethics Board (REB) approval will be obtained prior to beginning any research-
specific procedures. Following initial ethics approval, ongoing ethical approval will be 
maintained and the clinical trial will undergo REB review at least annually, in accordance 
with regulatory and REB requirements. The clinical trial will be conducted in accordance 
with the REB-approved study documents and the determinations (including any 
limitations) of the REB, and in compliance with REB requirements. Any amendments to 
the protocol will require review and approval by the REB before the changes are 
implemented in the clinical trial, unless to eliminate an immediate hazard to the 
participant. 
 
Whenever new information becomes available that may be relevant to participant 
consent, a consent form and/or consent for addendum will be presented to the REB for 
review and approval prior to its use. Any revised written information will receive REB 
approval prior to use. 
12.2 Informed Consent Process & Documentation 
Informed consent is a process that is initiated prior to the individual agreeing to take part 
in the clinical trial and continues throughout their participation. 
 
Informed consent will be obtained from each participant prior to their participation in the 
clinical trial. Informed consent will be obtained by appropriately trained and qualified 
CAMH research personnel who do not have an existing clinical relationship with the 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
50 
participant or caregiver The PI will not obtain participant consent. Informed consent will 
be obtained in-person.  
 
Each participant will be provided with a current copy of the REB approved ICF prior to the 
consent discussion. Research personnel will explain the clinical trial to the participant and 
answer any questions that may arise. This discussion will include an explanation of the 
clinical trial purpose, procedures, potential 
risks and benefits, confidentiality 
considerations and participant rights (e.g. participants will not be penalized or lose any 
benefits regardless of what they decide and they have the right to withdraw from the 
clinical trial at any time). Participants may take as much time as they need to make their 
decision, and may consult with others (e.g. family members, other health care providers, 
etc.) if they like. Following the consent discussion, and once the participant has decided 
to take part, the participant, and the person conducting the consent discussion will 
personally sign and date the ICF. Each participant will be provided with a complete (fully 
signed) copy of the ICF. The original ICF(s) and the informed consent process will be 
documented in the source documents. 
 
Each study visit occurring onsite, including the consent visit, will follow the most current  
institutional IPAC guidelines put forth by CAMH to ensure staff and participants are 
protected against COVID-19 and other infectious diseases (e.g. participant screening 
upon entry, frequent hand-washing, masks for participants and staff).  
13.0 PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY 
All clinical trial-related documents and data will be held in strict confidence and stored at 
CAMH or on CAMH servers, and will follow CAMH policies and procedures to ensure 
participant privacy and confidentiality.  
 
All research activities will be conducted in as private a setting as possible. The study team 
(including the PI), the study monitor, representatives of the REB, and Health Canada may 
inspect all documents and records required to be maintained by the PI, including but not 
limited to, medical records and pharmacy records for the participants in this clinical trial. 
The participant’s contact information will be securely stored at CAMH for internal use 
during the clinical trial. At the end of the clinical trial, all records will continue to be kept in 
a secure location in accordance to applicable institutional and regulatory requirements. 
Safety reports on dosing information, AEs, and concomitant medications will be provided 
annually. Safety reports on demography, AEs, and concomitant medications will be 
provided at the end of the study. Safety reports on serious adverse events that have a 
causal relationship to the IP and on pregnancy will occur within 24hrs of the study team 
being notified. None of these safety reports will contain PHI and all data will be coded. A 
description of the reporting procedures can be found in the agreement with Filament 
Health Corporation.   
 
There is a potential risk of breach of confidentiality that is inherent in all research 
protocols. Breach of confidentiality will be minimized by the research staff who will 
maintain research data (identified only by participant code number not related to name, 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
51 
or date of birth). A list of participant names, their ID numbers, and information about how 
they can be reached will be kept in a separate locked cabinet with access only to study 
personnel authorized by the PI. To minimize the risk of breach of confidentiality formal 
training sessions for all research staff emphasizing the importance of confidentiality will 
be conducted and formal mechanisms limiting access to information that can link data to 
individual participants will be monitored and established by study personnel. All 
information obtained from participants will be kept as confidential as possible. Computer-
based files/data will be entered into password-secured databases (details below) and 
paper-based files will be stored in a secure location. These data will only be accessible 
to personnel involved in the study and they will abide by confidentiality regulations of the 
REB.  
 
In unusual cases, a participant’s research record may be released in response to a court 
order. If the research team learns that a participant or someone with whom the participant 
is involved with is in serious danger or harm, an investigator will inform the appropriate 
agencies. 
 
Data from this study will be entered into a secure REDCap database.  At point-of-entry, 
data values will undergo consistency edits (e.g., ID validation, range verification, duplicate 
detection) and personnel will be required to correct errors. Reports will be created via the 
REDCap program. Data management staff will run logic error programs to check for 
accuracy and irregularities within and across data structures and within and across sites. 
Quality assurance checks will be conducted regularly by study personnel. Although 
unlikely, instances may occur where REDCap is not available.  In the case that this 
happens, we will follow the CAMH REDCap Downtime Procedures. 
 
14.0 CLINICAL TRIAL FINANCES 
14.1 Funding Source 
This study is funded by the University of Toronto.  
14.2 Conflict of Interest 
The research team does not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.  
 
15.0 PUBLICATION POLICY/DATA SHARING 
In the publication of the results of research, the investigators are obliged to preserve the 
confidentiality of all research participants. Participants will not be identified in any 
publication of research results. The results of this study will be published as group data 
without the use of characteristics that would identify individual participants. The study 
investigator will hold the primary responsibility for the publication of the results of the 
clinical trial. All publications will follow CAMH policies associated with publications.  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
52 
Safety data (i.e., pregnancy reports, adverse events and SAE’s) will be reported to 
Filament Health Corp, the provider of the investigational product for this study.  
15.1 Future Secondary Use of Data 
 
De-identified data from this project may be used for future research by internal and/or 
external project collaborators in the future. The research team may share de-identified 
data with other researchers at CAMH or with collaborators around the world. Coded data 
that has been collected may also be combined with data collected from other people on 
other studies or it may be saved in a database. This is an optional part of the study for 
participants. On the ICF, participants can indicate whether they consent to allowing their 
data to be shared and/or pooled in the future.  
 
16.0 REFERENCES 
 
 
Barrett FS, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Validation of the revised Mystical Experience 
Questionnaire 
in 
experimental 
sessions 
with 
psilocybin. Journal 
of 
Psychopharmacology. 2015;29(11):1182-1190. doi:10.1177/0269881115609019 
 
Broder, M. S., Bates, J. A., Jing, Y., Hebden, T., Forbes, R. A., & Chang, E. (2012). 
Association between second-generation antipsychotic medication half-life and 
hospitalization in the community treatment of adult schizophrenia. J Med Econ, 
15(1), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2011.632042  
 
Buchborn, T., Schröder, H., Höllt, V., & Grecksch, G. (2014, Jun). Repeated lysergic acid 
diethylamide in an animal model of depression: Normalisation of learning 
behaviour and hippocampal serotonin 5-HT2 signalling. J Psychopharmacol, 
28(6), 545-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114531666  
 
Burke MJ, Blumberger DM (2021). Caution at psychiatry’s psychedelic frontier. Nat Med, 
27(10), 1687–8. 
 
Busner J, Targum SD (2007). The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research 
tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry Edgmont Pa Townsh., 4(7), 28–37.  
 
Cameron, L. P., Benson, C. J., DeFelice, B. C., Fiehn, O., & Olson, D. E. (2019, Jul 17). 
Chronic, Intermittent Microdoses of the Psychedelic N,N-Dimethyltryptamine 
(DMT) Produce Positive Effects on Mood and Anxiety in Rodents. ACS Chem 
Neurosci, 10(7), 3261-3270. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00692  
 
Cameron, L. P., Benson, C. J., Dunlap, L. E., & Olson, D. E. (2018, Jul 18). Effects of N, 
N-Dimethyltryptamine on Rat Behaviors Relevant to Anxiety and Depression. ACS 
Chem Neurosci, 9(7), 1582-1590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00134  

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
53 
 
Cantù F, Ciappolino V, Enrico P, Moltrasio C, Delvecchio G, Brambilla P (2021, Feb). 
Augmentation with Atypical Antipsychotics for Treatment-Resistant Depression. J 
Affect Disord, 280(Pt A), 45–53.  
 
Carhart-Harris R, Giribaldi B, Watts R, Baker-Jones M, Murphy-Beiner A, Murphy R, et al 
(2021, Apr). Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression. N Engl J Med, 
15;384(15),1402–11.  
 
Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Rucker J, Day CMJ, Erritzoe D, Kaelen M, et al (2016, 
Jul). Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an 
open-label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry, 3(7), 619–27.  
 
Carod-Artal FJ. Hallucinogenic drugs in pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures (2015, 
Feb). Neurol Barc Spain, 30(1), 42–9. 
 
Carter B, Strawbridge R, Husain MI, Jones BDM, Short R, Cleare AJ, et al (2020, Sep). 
Relative effectiveness of augmentation treatments for treatment-resistant 
depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 
Abingdon Engl, 32(5–6), 477–90.  
 
Castaneda, A. E., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., Marttunen, M., Suvisaari, J., & Lönnqvist, J. 
(2008, Feb). A review on cognitive impairments in depressive and anxiety 
disorders with a focus on young adults. J Affect Disord, 106(1-2), 1-27. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.006  
 
Correia, C., & Vicente, A. M. (2007, Aug). Pharmacogenetics of risperidone response and 
induced 
side 
effects. 
Per 
Med, 
4(3), 
271-293. 
https://doi.org/10.2217/17410541.4.3.271  
 
COMPASS Pathways announces positive topline results from groundbreaking phase IIb 
trial of investigational COMP360 psilocybin therapy for treatment-resistant 
depression | COMPASS Pathways plc [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 2]. Available 
from: 
https://ir.compasspathways.com/news-releases/news-release-
details/compass-pathways-announces-positive-topline-results/ 
 
Creese I, Burt DR, Synder SH. The dopamine receptor: differential binding of d-LSD and 
related agents to agonist and antagonist states (1975, Dec 1). Life Sci, 17(11), 
1715–9.  
 
Davis AK, Barrett FS, May DG, Cosimano MP, Sepeda ND, Johnson MW, et al (2021, 
May). Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder: A 
Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 78(5), 481–9.  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
54 
de Wit H, Molla HM, Bershad A, Bremmer M, Lee R (2021, May). Repeated low doses of 
LSD in healthy adults: A placebo-controlled, dose-response study. Addict Biol., 
27(2), e13143. 
 
Dittrich A, Lamparter D, Maurer M (2010). 5D-ASC: Questionnaire for the assessment of 
altered states of consciousness. Short Introd Zurich Switz PSIN PLUS. 
 
First MB. Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID). In: The Encyclopedia of 
Clinical Psychology [Internet]. American Cancer Society; 2015 [cited 2021 Aug 13]. 
p. 
1–6. 
Available 
from: 
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp351 
 
Galvão-Coelho NL, Marx W, Gonzalez M, Sinclair J, de Manincor M, Perkins D, et al 
(2021). Classic serotonergic psychedelics for mood and depressive symptoms: a 
meta-analysis 
of 
mood 
disorder 
patients 
and 
healthy 
participants. 
Psychopharmacology (Berl), 238(2), 341–54.  
 
Gaynes BN, Lux L, Gartlehner G, Asher G, Forman-Hoffman V, Green J, et al (2020 Feb). 
Defining treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety, 37(2), 134–45.  
 
Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Carducci MA, Umbricht A, Richards WA, Richards BD, et al 
(2016, May). Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in 
depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized 
double-blind trial. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl, 30(12), 1181–97.  
 
Grob C, Bossis A, Griffiths R (2013). Use of the Classic Hallucinogen Psilocybin for 
Treatment of Existential Distress Associated with Cancer. p. 291–308.  
 
Grob, C. S., Danforth, A. L., Chopra, G. S., Hagerty, M., McKay, C. R., Halberstadt, A. L., 
& Greer, G. R. (2011, Jan). Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients 
with 
advanced-stage 
cancer. 
Arch 
Gen 
Psychiatry, 
68(1), 
71-78. 
https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.116 
 
Gukasyan N, Davis AK, Barrett FS, Cosimano MP, Sepeda ND, Johnson MW, et al (2022, 
Feb). Efficacy and safety of psilocybin-assisted treatment for major depressive 
disorder: Prospective 12-month follow-up. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl., 36(2), 
151–8.  
 
Guss JR, Krause R, Sloshower J (2020). The Yale Manual for Psilocybin-Assisted 
Therapy of Depression (using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a 
Therapeutic Frame).  
 
Halberstadt, A. L., Koedood, L., Powell, S. B., & Geyer, M. A. (2011). Differential 
contributions of serotonin receptors to the behavioral effects of indoleamine 
hallucinogens in mice. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 25(11), 1548-1561. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881110388326  

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
55 
 
Hamilton M (1960, Feb). A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION. J Neurol Neurosurg 
Psychiatry, 23(1), 56–62. 
 
Harvey, J. A. (2003). Role of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor in learning. Learning & 
Memory, 10(5), 355-362. 
 
Herbeck Belnap B, Schulberg HC, He F, Mazumdar S, Reynolds CF, Rollman BL (2015, 
Apr). Electronic protocol for suicide risk management in research participants. J 
Psychosom Res, (4), 340–5. 
 
Hesselgrave N, Troppoli TA, Wulff AB, Cole AB, Thompson SM (2021, Apr). Harnessing 
psilocybin: antidepressant-like behavioral and synaptic actions of psilocybin are 
independent of 5-HT2R activation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 118(17), 
e2022489118.  
 
Hibicke, M., Landry, A. N., Kramer, H. M., Talman, Z. K., & Nichols, C. D. (2020, Mar 18). 
Psychedelics, but Not Ketamine, Produce Persistent Antidepressant-like Effects in 
a Rodent Experimental System for the Study of Depression. ACS Chem Neurosci, 
11(6), 864-871. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00493  
 
Ho SC, Jacob SA, Tangiisuran B (2017, Jun). Barriers and facilitators of adherence to 
antidepressants among outpatients with major depressive disorder: A qualitative 
study. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0179290. 
 
Horsley, R. R., Páleníček, T., Kolin, J., & Valeš, K. (2018). Psilocin and ketamine 
microdosing: effects of subchronic intermittent microdoses in the elevated plus-
maze in male Wistar rats. Behavioural pharmacology, 29(6), 530-536.  
 
Johnson, M., Richards, W., & Griffiths, R. (2008, Aug). Human hallucinogen research: 
guidelines 
for 
safety. 
J 
Psychopharmacol, 
22(6), 
603-620. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881108093587 
 
Johnson MW, Griffiths RR, Hendricks PS, Henningfield JE (2018, Nov). The abuse 
potential of medical psilocybin according to the 8 factors of the Controlled 
Substances Act. Neuropharmacology, 142, 143–66. 
 
Johnson MW, Hendricks PS, Barrett FS, Griffiths RR (2019, May). Classic psychedelics: 
An integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and 
brain network function. Pharmacol Ther, 197, 83–102. 
 
Julious SA (2005). Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm 
Stat, 4(4), 287–91.  
 
Li G, Zhang L, DiBernardo A, Wang G, Sheehan JJ, Lee K, et al (2020). A retrospective 
analysis to estimate the healthcare resource utilization and cost associated with 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
56 
treatment-resistant depression in commercially insured US patients. PloS One, 
15(9), e0238843.  
 
Madsen PL, Hasselbalch SG, Hagemann LP, Olsen KS, Bulow J, Holm S, et al (1995). 
Persistent resetting of the cerebral oxygen/glucose uptake ratio by brain activation: 
evidence obtained with the Kety-Schmidt technique. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 
Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 15, 485–91. 
 
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D., Dyssegaard, A., Stenbæk, D. S., Kristiansen, 
S., Johansen, S. S., Lehel, S., Linnet, K., Svarer, C., Erritzoe, D., Ozenne, B., & 
Knudsen, G. M. (2019, Jun). Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with 
serotonin 
2A 
receptor 
occupancy 
and 
plasma 
psilocin 
levels. 
Neuropsychopharmacology, 44(7), 1328-1334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-
019-0324-9  
 
Meltzer, H. Y., Matsubara, S., & Lee, J. C. (1989). The ratios of serotonin2 and dopamine2 
affinities differentiate atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs. Psychopharmacol 
Bull, 25(3), 390-392.  
McClain, C. S., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2003, May 10). Effect of spiritual well-being 
on end-of-life despair in terminally-ill cancer patients. Lancet, 361(9369), 1603-
1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13310-7. 
 
Nomi JS, Vij SG, Dajani DR, Steimke R, Damaraju E, Rachakonda S, et al (2017, Feb). 
Chronnectomic Patterns and Neural Flexibility Underlie Executive Function. 
NeuroImage., 147, 861–71.  
 
Nutt, D. J., King, L. A., & Phillips, L. D. (2010, Nov 6). Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria 
decision analysis. Lancet, 376(9752), 1558-1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-
6736(10)61462-6 
 
Perkins, D., Sarris, J., Rossell, S., Bonomo, Y., Forbes, D., Davey, C., Hoyer, D., Loo, C., 
Murray, G., Hood, S., Schubert, V., Galvão-Coelho, N. L., O'Donnell, M., Carter, 
O., Liknaitzky, P., Williams, M., Siskind, D., Penington, D., Berk, M., & Castle, D. 
(2021, Dec). Medicinal psychedelics for mental health and addiction: Advancing 
research of an emerging paradigm. Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 55(12), 1127-1133. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867421998785 
 
Reutfors J, Andersson TM-L, Brenner P, Brandt L, DiBernardo A, Li G, et al (2018). 
Mortality in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A register-based cohort study 
in Sweden. J Affect Disord, 01;238:674–9.  
 
Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, et al (2006, 
Nov). Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or 
several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry, 163(11), 1905–17 
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
57 
Ross S, Bossis A, Guss J, Agin-Liebes G, Malone T, Cohen B, et al (2016, Dec). Rapid 
and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and 
depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J 
Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl, 30(12), 1165–80. 
 
Sackeim H. Sackeim HA (2001, Feb). The definition and meaning of treatment-resistant 
depression. J Clin Psychiatry 62: S1-S17. J Clin Psychiatry, 62 Suppl 16, 10–7. 
 
Schatzberg, A. F., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2009). The American psychiatric publishing 
textbook of psychopharmacology. American Psychiatric Pub.  
 
Schlag AK, Aday J, Salam I, Neill JC, Nutt DJ (2022, Feb). Adverse effects of 
psychedelics: From anecdotes and misinformation to systematic science. J 
Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl. 2;2698811211069100. 
 
Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA, WHOQOL Group (2004, Mar). The World Health 
Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric 
properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL 
group. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil, 13(2), 299–310. 
 
Snaith RP, Hamilton M, Morley S, Humayan A, Hargreaves D, Trigwell P (1995, Jul). A 
scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br 
J Psychiatry J Ment Sci, 167(1), 99–103.  
 
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B (2006, May). A brief measure for assessing 
generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med, 166(10):1092–7.  
 
Szigeti B, Kartner L, Blemings A, Rosas F, Feilding A, Nutt DJ, et al (2021, Mar). Self-
blinding citizen science to explore psychedelic microdosing. Baker CI, Shackman 
A, Perez Garcia-Romeu A, Hutten N, editors. eLife, 10:e62878. 
  
 
Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al (2007, Nov). The 
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK 
validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 5(1), 63.  
 
Therneau TM (1993, Apr). How many stratification factors are “too many” to use in a 
randomization plan? Control Clin Trials, 14(2), 98–108. 
 
Vandenberghe, F., Guidi, M., Choong, E., von Gunten, A., Conus, P., Csajka, C., & Eap, 
C. B. (2015, 
Dec). Genetics-Based 
Population 
Pharmacokinetics 
and 
Pharmacodynamics of Risperidone in a Psychiatric Cohort. Clin Pharmacokinet, 
54(12), 1259-1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0289-8 
 
Vollenweider FX, Leenders KL, Oye I, Hell D, Angst J (1997, Feb). Differential 
psychopathology and patterns of cerebral glucose utilisation produced by (S)- and 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
58 
(R)-ketamine in healthy volunteers using positron emission tomography (PET). Eur 
Neuropsychopharmacol, 7, 25–38.  
 
Vollenweider FX, Vollenweider-Scherpenhuyzen MF, Bäbler A, Vogel H, Hell D (1998, 
Dec). Psilocybin induces schizophrenia-like psychosis in humans via a serotonin-
2 agonist action. Neuroreport, 9(17), 3897–902.  
 
Visser, A., Garssen, B., & Vingerhoets, A. (2010, Jun). Spirituality and well-being in 
cancer 
patients: 
a 
review. 
Psychooncology, 
19(6), 
565-572. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1626 
 
Wilkinson ST, Kitay BM, Harper A, Rhee TG, Sint K, Ghosh A, et al (2021, Jul). Barriers 
to the Implementation of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT): Results From a 
Nationwide Survey of ECT Practitioners. Psychiatr Serv Wash DC, 72(7), 752–7 
 
Wiles N, Thomas L, Abel A, Ridgway N, Turner N, Campbell J, et al (2013, Feb). Cognitive 
behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for primary care based 
patients with treatment resistant depression: results of the CoBalT randomised 
controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl, 381(9864), 375–84  
 
 
Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Jensen, M. P., Chen, W. H., Choi, S., Revicki, D., Cella, D., Rothrock, 
N., Keefe, F., Callahan, L., & Lai, J. S. (2010, Jul). Development of a PROMIS item bank 
to 
measure 
pain 
interference. 
Pain, 
150(1), 
173-182. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025  
 
Bair, M. J., Robinson, R. L., Katon, W., & Kroenke, K. (2003, Nov 10). Depression and pain 
comorbidity: 
a 
literature 
review. 
Arch 
Intern 
Med, 
163(20), 
2433-2445. 
https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.20.2433  
 
Bennett, M. (2001, May). The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms 
and signs. Pain, 92(1-2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00482-6  
 
Bingham, C. O., Butanis, A. L., Orbai, A. M., Jones, M., Ruffing, V., Lyddiatt, A., Schrandt, M. 
S., Bykerk, V. P., Cook, K. F., & Bartlett, S. J. (2021, Sep 1). Patients and clinicians define 
symptom levels and meaningful change for PROMIS pain interference and fatigue in RA 
using 
bookmarking. 
Rheumatology 
(Oxford), 
60(9), 
4306-4314. 
https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab014  
 
Bondesson, E., Larrosa Pardo, F., Stigmar, K., Ringqvist, Å., Petersson, I. F., Jöud, A., & Schelin, 
M. E. C. (2018, Aug). Comorbidity between pain and mental illness - Evidence of a 
bidirectional relationship. Eur J Pain, 22(7), 1304-1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1218  
 
Buchborn, T., Schröder, H., Höllt, V., & Grecksch, G. (2014, Jun). Repeated lysergic acid 
diethylamide in an animal model of depression: Normalisation of learning behaviour and 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
59 
hippocampal 
serotonin 
5-HT2 signalling. 
J Psychopharmacol, 28(6), 545-552. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114531666  
 
Burton, A. K., Tillotson, K. M., Main, C. J., & Hollis, S. (1995, Mar 15). Psychosocial predictors 
of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 20(6), 722-
728. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014  
 
Busner, J., & Targum, S. D. (2007, Jul). The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research 
tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 4(7), 28-37.  
 
Cameron, L. P., Benson, C. J., DeFelice, B. C., Fiehn, O., & Olson, D. E. (2019, Jul 17). Chronic, 
Intermittent Microdoses of the Psychedelic N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) Produce 
Positive Effects on Mood and Anxiety in Rodents. ACS Chem Neurosci, 10(7), 3261-3270. 
https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00692  
 
Cameron, L. P., Benson, C. J., Dunlap, L. E., & Olson, D. E. (2018, Jul 18). Effects of N, N-
Dimethyltryptamine on Rat Behaviors Relevant to Anxiety and Depression. ACS Chem 
Neurosci, 9(7), 1582-1590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00134  
 
Carhart-Harris, R., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R., Baker-Jones, M., Murphy-Beiner, A., Murphy, R., 
Martell, J., Blemings, A., Erritzoe, D., & Nutt, D. J. (2021, Apr 15). Trial of Psilocybin 
versus 
Escitalopram 
for 
Depression. 
N Engl J Med, 384(15), 1402-1411. 
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032994  
 
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Leech, R., Hellyer, P. J., Shanahan, M., Feilding, A., Tagliazucchi, E., 
Chialvo, D. R., & Nutt, D. (2014). The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed 
by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Front Hum Neurosci, 8, 20. 
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00020  
 
Carter, B., Strawbridge, R., Husain, M. I., Jones, B. D. M., Short, R., Cleare, A. J., Tsapekos, D., 
Patrick, F., Marwood, L., Taylor, R. W., Mantingh, T., de Angel, V., Nikolova, V. L., 
Carvalho, A. F., & Young, A. H. (2020, Aug-Sep). Relative effectiveness of augmentation 
treatments for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and network meta-
analysis. 
Int 
Rev 
Psychiatry, 
32(5-6), 
477-490. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2020.1765748  
 
Castaneda, A. E., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., Marttunen, M., Suvisaari, J., & Lönnqvist, J. (2008, Feb). 
A review on cognitive impairments in depressive and anxiety disorders with a focus on 
young adults. J Affect Disord, 106(1-2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.006  
 
Castellanos, J. P., Woolley, C., Bruno, K. A., Zeidan, F., Halberstadt, A., & Furnish, T. (2020, 
Jul). Chronic pain and psychedelics: a review and proposed mechanism of action. Reg 
Anesth Pain Med, 45(7), 486-494. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101273  
 
Chen, C. X., Kroenke, K., Stump, T. E., Kean, J., Carpenter, J. S., Krebs, E. E., Bair, M. J., 
Damush, T. M., & Monahan, P. O. (2018, Apr). Estimating minimally important 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
60 
differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: results from 3 randomized clinical 
trials. Pain, 159(4), 775-782. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001121  
 
Cherif, F., Zouari, H. G., Cherif, W., Hadded, M., Cheour, M., & Damak, R. (2020). Depression 
Prevalence in Neuropathic Pain and Its Impact on the Quality of Life. Pain Res Manag, 
2020, 7408508. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7408508  
 
COMPASS. (2021, November 9, 2021). COMPASS Pathways announces positive topline results 
from groundbreaking phase IIb trial of investigational COMP360 psilocybin therapy for 
treatment-resistant depression. COMPASS Pathways plc. Retrieved April 20 from 
https://ir.compasspathways.com/news-releases/news-release-details/compass-pathways-
announces-positive-topline-results/ 
 
Derry, S., Bell, R. F., Straube, S., Wiffen, P. J., Aldington, D., & Moore, R. A. (2019, Jan 23). 
Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1(1), Cd007076. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007076.pub3  
 
Dhanju, S., Kennedy, S. H., Abbey, S., Katz, J., Weinrib, A., Clarke, H., Bhat, V., & Ladha, K. 
(2019, Apr 24). The impact of comorbid pain and depression in the United States: results 
from 
a 
nationally 
representative 
survey. 
Scand J 
Pain, 
19(2), 
319-325. 
https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0323  
 
Dittrich, A. (1998). The standardized psychometric assessment of altered states of consciousness 
(ASCs) in humans [doi:10.1055/s-2007-979351]. 
Pharmacopsychiatry, 31, 80-84. 
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-979351  
 
Emir, B., Johnson, K., Kuhn, M., & Parsons, B. (2017, Jan). Predictive Modeling of Response to 
Pregabalin for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain Using 6-Week Observational Data: A 
Spectrum 
of 
Modern 
Analytics 
Applications. 
Clin 
Ther, 
39(1), 
98-106. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.015  
 
Ferreira, G. E., Abdel-Shaheed, C., Underwood, M., Finnerup, N. B., Day, R. O., McLachlan, A., 
Eldabe, S., Zadro, J. R., & Maher, C. G. (2023, Feb 1). Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 
antidepressants for pain in adults: overview of systematic reviews. Bmj, 380, e072415. 
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072415  
 
Gaynes, B. N., Lux, L., Gartlehner, G., Asher, G., Forman-Hoffman, V., Green, J., Boland, E., 
Weber, R. P., Randolph, C., Bann, C., Coker-Schwimmer, E., Viswanathan, M., & Lohr, 
K. N. (2020, Feb). Defining treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety, 37(2), 134-
145. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22968  
 
Glynos, N. G., Pierce, J., Davis, A. K., McAfee, J., & Boehnke, K. F. (2023, Jan-Mar). Knowledge, 
Perceptions, and Use of Psychedelics among Individuals 
with Fibromyalgia. 
J 
Psychoactive Drugs, 55(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2021.2022817  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
61 
Goel, A., Rai, Y., Sivadas, S., Diep, C., Clarke, H., Shanthanna, H., & Ladha, K. S. (2023, Oct 1). 
Use of Psychedelics for Pain: A Scoping Review. Anesthesiology, 139(4), 523-536. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000004673  
 
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Carducci, M. A., Umbricht, A., Richards, W. A., Richards, B. 
D., Cosimano, M. P., & Klinedinst, M. A. (2016, Dec). Psilocybin produces substantial 
and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: 
A 
randomized 
double-blind 
trial. 
J 
Psychopharmacol, 30(12), 
1181-1197. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116675513  
 
Grob, C. S., Danforth, A. L., Chopra, G. S., Hagerty, M., McKay, C. R., Halberstadt, A. L., & 
Greer, G. R. (2011, Jan). Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with 
advanced-stage 
cancer. 
Arch 
Gen 
Psychiatry, 
68(1), 
71-78. 
https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.116  
 
Halberstadt, A. L., Koedood, L., Powell, S. B., & Geyer, M. A. (2011). Differential contributions 
of serotonin receptors to the behavioral effects of indoleamine hallucinogens in mice. 
Journal 
of 
Psychopharmacology, 
25(11), 
1548-1561. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881110388326  
 
Hamilton, M. (1960, Feb). A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 23(1), 
56-62. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56  
 
Harvey, J. A. (2003). Role of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor in learning. Learning & Memory, 
10(5), 355-362.  
 
Hasler, F., Bourquin, D., Brenneisen, R., Bär, T., & Vollenweider, F. X. (1997, Jun). 
Determination of psilocin and 4-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid in plasma by HPLC-ECD and 
pharmacokinetic profiles of oral and intravenous psilocybin in man. Pharm Acta Helv, 
72(3), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-6865(97)00014-9  
 
Hasler, F., Bourquin, D., Brenneisen, R., & Vollenweider, F. X. (2002, 2002/09/05/). Renal 
excretion profiles of psilocin following oral administration of psilocybin: a controlled study 
in man. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 30(2), 331-339. 
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00278-9  
 
Hasler, F., Grimberg, U., Benz, M. A., Huber, T., & Vollenweider, F. X. (2004, Mar). Acute 
psychological and physiological effects of psilocybin in healthy humans: a double-blind, 
placebo-controlled dose-effect study. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 172(2), 145-156. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1640-6  
 
Hesselgrave, N., Troppoli, T. A., Wulff, A. B., Cole, A. B., & Thompson, S. M. (2021, Apr 27). 
Harnessing psilocybin: antidepressant-like behavioral and synaptic actions of psilocybin 
are independent of 5-HT2R activation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 118(17). 
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022489118  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
62 
Hibicke, M., Landry, A. N., Kramer, H. M., Talman, Z. K., & Nichols, C. D. (2020, Mar 18). 
Psychedelics, but Not Ketamine, Produce Persistent Antidepressant-like Effects in a 
Rodent Experimental System for the Study of Depression. ACS Chem Neurosci, 11(6), 
864-871. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00493  
 
Ho, S. C., Jacob, S. A., & Tangiisuran, B. (2017). Barriers and facilitators of adherence to 
antidepressants among outpatients with major depressive disorder: A qualitative study. 
PLoS One, 12(6), e0179290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179290  
 
Horsley, R. R., Páleníček, T., Kolin, J., & Valeš, K. (2018). Psilocin and ketamine microdosing: 
effects of subchronic intermittent microdoses in the elevated plus-maze in male Wistar rats. 
Behavioural pharmacology, 29(6), 530-536.  
 
Johnson, M., Richards, W., & Griffiths, R. (2008, Aug). Human hallucinogen research: guidelines 
for 
safety. 
J 
Psychopharmacol, 
22(6), 
603-620. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881108093587  
 
Julious, S. A. (2005). Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical 
Statistics, 4(4), 287-291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.185  
 
Karayannis, N. V., Sturgeon, J. A., Chih-Kao, M., Cooley, C., & Mackey, S. C. (2017, Jun). Pain 
interference and physical function demonstrate poor longitudinal association in people 
living 
with 
pain: 
a 
PROMIS 
investigation. 
Pain, 
158(6), 
1063-1068. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000881  
 
Kuner, R., & Flor, H. (2016, Dec 15). Structural plasticity and reorganisation in chronic pain. Nat 
Rev Neurosci, 18(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.162  
 
Li, G., Zhang, L., DiBernardo, A., Wang, G., Sheehan, J. J., Lee, K., Reutfors, J., & Zhang, Q. 
(2020). A retrospective analysis to estimate the healthcare resource utilization and cost 
associated with treatment-resistant depression in commercially insured US patients. PLoS 
One, 15(9), e0238843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238843  
 
Lindenblatt, H., Krämer, E., Holzmann-Erens, P., Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E., & Kovar, K.-A. (1998, 
1998/05/29/). Quantitation of psilocin in human plasma by high-performance liquid 
chromatography and electrochemical detection: comparison of liquid–liquid extraction 
with automated on-line solid-phase extraction. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical 
Sciences and Applications, 709(2), 255-263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-
4347(98)00067-X  
 
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D., Dyssegaard, A., Stenbæk, D. S., Kristiansen, S., 
Johansen, S. S., Lehel, S., Linnet, K., Svarer, C., Erritzoe, D., Ozenne, B., & Knudsen, G. 
M. (2019, Jun). Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with serotonin 2A receptor 
occupancy and plasma psilocin levels. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44(7), 1328-1334. 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0324-9  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
63 
McClain, C. S., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2003, May 10). Effect of spiritual well-being on 
end-of-life despair in terminally-ill cancer patients. Lancet, 361(9369), 1603-1607. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13310-7  
 
Montgomery, S. A., & Asberg, M. (1979, Apr). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive 
to change. Br J Psychiatry, 134, 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.134.4.382  
 
Moore, R. A., Wiffen, P. J., Derry, S., Toelle, T., & Rice, A. S. (2014, Apr 27). Gabapentin for 
chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 
2014(4), Cd007938. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub3  
 
Nutt, D. J., King, L. A., & Phillips, L. D. (2010, Nov 6). Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria 
decision 
analysis. 
Lancet, 376(9752), 
1558-1565. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-
6736(10)61462-6  
 
Perkins, D., Sarris, J., Rossell, S., Bonomo, Y., Forbes, D., Davey, C., Hoyer, D., Loo, C., Murray, 
G., Hood, S., Schubert, V., Galvão-Coelho, N. L., O'Donnell, M., Carter, O., Liknaitzky, 
P., Williams, M., Siskind, D., Penington, D., Berk, M., & Castle, D. (2021, Dec). Medicinal 
psychedelics for mental health and addiction: Advancing research of an emerging 
paradigm. 
Aust 
N 
Z 
J 
Psychiatry, 
55(12), 
1127-1133. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867421998785  
 
Reutfors, J., Andersson, T. M., Brenner, P., Brandt, L., DiBernardo, A., Li, G., Hägg, D., Wingård, 
L., & Bodén, R. (2018, Oct 1). Mortality in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A 
register-based 
cohort 
study 
in 
Sweden. 
J 
Affect Disord, 
238, 
674-679. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.030  
 
Ross, S., Bossis, A., Guss, J., Agin-Liebes, G., Malone, T., Cohen, B., Mennenga, S. E., Belser, 
A., Kalliontzi, K., Babb, J., Su, Z., Corby, P., & Schmidt, B. L. (2016, Dec). Rapid and 
sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in 
patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol, 
30(12), 1165-1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116675512  
 
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Stewart, J. W., Warden, D., 
Niederehe, G., Thase, M. E., Lavori, P. W., Lebowitz, B. D., McGrath, P. J., Rosenbaum, 
J. F., Sackeim, H. A., Kupfer, D. J., Luther, J., & Fava, M. (2006, Nov). Acute and longer-
term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a 
STAR*D 
report. 
Am 
J 
Psychiatry, 
163(11), 
1905-1917. 
https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905  
 
Schaefer, C., Sadosky, A., Mann, R., Daniel, S., Parsons, B., Tuchman, M., Anschel, A., Stacey, 
B. R., Nalamachu, S., & Nieshoff, E. (2014). Pain severity and the economic burden of 
neuropathic pain in the United States: BEAT Neuropathic Pain Observational Study. 
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, 6, 483-496. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.S63323  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
64 
Snaith, R. P., Hamilton, M., Morley, S., Humayan, A., Hargreaves, D., & Trigwell, P. (1995, Jul). 
A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J 
Psychiatry, 167(1), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.167.1.99  
 
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006, May 22). A brief measure for 
assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med, 166(10), 1092-1097. 
https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092  
 
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., & Vollenweider, F. X. (2010, Aug 31). Psychometric evaluation of the 
altered states of consciousness rating scale (OAV). PLoS One, 5(8), e12412. 
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012412  
 
Torrance, N., Lawson, K. D., Afolabi, E., Bennett, M. I., Serpell, M. G., Dunn, K. M., & Smith, 
B. H. (2014, Oct). Estimating the burden of disease in chronic pain with and without 
neuropathic characteristics: does the choice between the EQ-5D and SF-6D matter? Pain, 
155(10), 1996-2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.001  
 
VanDenKerkhof, E. G., Mann, E. G., Torrance, N., Smith, B. H., Johnson, A., & Gilron, I. (2016). 
An Epidemiological Study of Neuropathic Pain Symptoms in Canadian Adults. Pain Res 
Manag, 2016, 9815750. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9815750  
 
Visser, A., Garssen, B., & Vingerhoets, A. (2010, Jun). Spirituality and well-being in cancer 
patients: a review. Psychooncology, 19(6), 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1626  
 
Wiles, N., Thomas, L., Abel, A., Ridgway, N., Turner, N., Campbell, J., Garland, A., Hollinghurst, 
S., Jerrom, B., Kessler, D., Kuyken, W., Morrison, J., Turner, K., Williams, C., Peters, T., 
& Lewis, G. (2013, Feb 2). Cognitive 
behavioural therapy as an adjunct to 
pharmacotherapy for primary care based patients with treatment resistant depression: 
results of the CoBalT randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 381(9864), 375-384. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61552-9  
 
Wilkinson, S. T., Kitay, B. M., Harper, A., Rhee, T. G., Sint, K., Ghosh, A., Lopez, M. O., Saenz, 
S., & Tsai, J. (2021, Jul 1). Barriers to the Implementation of Electroconvulsive Therapy 
(ECT): Results From a Nationwide Survey of ECT Practitioners. Psychiatr Serv, 72(7), 
752-757. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000387  
 
Yaden, D. B., Potash, J. B., & Griffiths, R. R. (2022, Oct 1). Preparing for the Bursting of the 
Psychedelic 
Hype 
Bubble. 
JAMA 
Psychiatry, 
79(10), 
943-944. 
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2546  
 
Yost, K. J., Eton, D. T., Garcia, S. F., & Cella, D. (2011, May). Minimally important differences 
were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-
Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol, 64(5), 507-516. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.018  
 

 
 
 
Protocol Version Number: 1.0 
 
             
Protocol Version Date: 29-APR-2024 
Template Version Date: 18-Oct-2021 
 
65 
Younger, J., Gandhi, V., Hubbard, E., & Mackey, S. (2012, Dec). Development of the Stanford 
Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS): a tool for measuring patient outcome expectancy 
in clinical trials. Clin Trials, 9(6), 767-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774512465064