The LIPid Intensive Drug Therapy for Sepsis ¬Pilot (LIPIDS-P) Phase I/II Trial
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Sepsis, Severe, Septic Shock
Sponsor: University of Florida

 
The Foundation for The Gator Nation 
An Equal Opportunity Institution 
 
College of Medicine - Jacksonville 
655 West 8th Street 
Department of Emergency Medicine 
Jacksonville, FL 32209 
 
904-244-4986 
 
The LIPid Intensive Drug therapy for Sepsis Phase II (LIPIDS-P) Trial 
 
NCT03405870 
 
Protocol Document, dated 08/13/2021 

08/13/2021 
 
1 of 19 
Title: The LIPid Intensive Drug therapy for Sepsis ¬Pilot (LIPIDS-P) Phase I/II Trial 
 
Submitting Investigator:  
Faheem W. Guirgis, MD 
Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, UF College of Medicine, Jacksonville 
Email : Faheem.Guirgis@jax.ufl.edu  
 
Co-Investigators:  
Frederick A. Moore, MD 
Chief of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, UF College of Medicine 
 
Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, PhD 
Professor and Chief, Department of Aging and Geriatrics, UF College of Medicine 
 
Lauren Black, MD 
Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, UF College of Medicine Jacksonville 
 
Elizabeth DeVos, MD 
Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, UF College of Medicine Jacksonville 
 
Srinivasa T. Reddy, PhD 
Professor of Medicine, Molecular, and Medical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, UCLA  
 
Lyle Moldawer, PhD 
Professor and Vice Chair of Research, Department of Surgery, UF College of Medicine 
 
Vandana Seeram, MD 
Associate Professor of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, UF College of Medicine, Jacksonville 
 
Marie Crandall, MD 
Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, UF College of Medicine, Jacksonville 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

08/13/2021 
 
2 of 19 
 
Abstract 
 
Sepsis is a life-threatening disease for which there are no effective treatments. It results from metabolic 
and immunologic derangements that lead to organ dysfunction, shock and sometimes death. Both "good" (high 
density lipoprotein, HDL-C) and "bad" (low density lipoprotein, LDL-C) cholesterol should protect against 
sepsis by clearing bacterial toxins from the blood and providing substrate for endogenous corticosteroids 
(protective in shock). However, for partially unknown reasons, cholesterol levels drop to critically low levels in 
early sepsis (first 48 hours), leaving the body defenseless against sepsis via these mechanisms. A fish-oil lipid 
injectable emulsion is FDA-approved for septic and critically ill patients that may be capable of elevating serum 
cholesterol levels. We hypothesize that fish oil lipid injectable emulsion administration to critically ill 
septic patients will improve quantitative and qualitative lipid measures, provide substrate for bacterial 
toxin clearance and steroid synthesis, and lead to improvements in early organ function and mortality. 
This phase II randomized pilot clinical trial, proposes to assess the drug’s ability to optimally, transiently 
elevate cholesterol and preliminary measures of biological activity and clinical outcomes. This novel LIPid 
Intensive Drug therapy for Sepsis Pilot (LIPIDS-P) clinical trial is the first study to attempt to transiently 
elevate cholesterol levels as a treatment modality in critically ill septic patients and will form the basis 
of a future Phase III randomized, controlled trial. 
 
 

08/13/2021 
 
3 of 19 
 
1.0 Aims 
 
Sepsis is a common, costly, and deadly condition for which there are no effective treatments. Although 
early interventions have improved short-term in-hospital mortality, persistent immunologic and metabolic 
derangements may lead to long-term organ dysfunction and late mortality.(Guirgis et al., 2014) In addition, 
early organ failure predicts death and subsequent chronic critical illness.(Levy et al., 2005; Shapiro et al., 
2006) Novel early treatments for sepsis are needed to improve long-term outcomes.  
 
Circulating lipoproteins play an important role in sepsis. Cholesterol plays an important role in sepsis 
and levels of both LDL-C and HDL-C are dynamically regulated in sepsis. Cholesterol is considered protective 
for its ability to bind and clear bacterial toxins, its anti-inflammatory properties, and is needed for steroid 
synthesis in stressful conditions. However, our research team has observed that lipid dysregulation occurs in 
early sepsis resulting in loss of cholesterol’s protective effects. We have demonstrated in sepsis that: 1) 
cholesterol levels drop precipitously, and drop-severity predicts death(Guirgis, Dodani, et al., 2017); 2) low 
baseline LDL-C levels are associated with increased long-term community-acquired sepsis risk(Guirgis, 
Donnelly, et al., 2016), and 3) inflammation leads to pro-inflammatory, dysfunctional cholesterol, which predicts 
organ failure and adverse outcomes.(Guirgis, Dodani, et al., 2017; Guirgis, Leeuwenburgh, et al., 2017) Our 
research and others strongly suggest that the drastic cholesterol reduction and pro-inflammatory lipid 
alterations seen in early sepsis are linked to early organ failure and poor outcomes.(J.-Y. Chien, Jerng, Yu, & 
Yang, 2005a; Y.-F. Chien, Chen, Hsu, Chen, & Yu, 2015; Guirgis, Dodani, et al., 2017) However, it is unknown 
whether attempting to elevate cholesterol levels in septic patients will improve clinical outcomes. 
 
We propose to address this gap in evidence via an interdisciplinary, multi-institution partnership (UF 
Health Jacksonville (UF-JAX), UF Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center (SCIRC), & UCLA) and a pilot 
randomized clinical trial LIPIDS-P (LIPid Intensive Drug therapy for Sepsis - Pilot). A novel lipid injectable 
emulsion (LIE) containing 15% fish oil is FDA-approved for nutritional purposes among septic and critically ill 
patients and may have the ability to raise cholesterol levels and will be tested in septic patients. Furthermore, 
lipid therapies were recently highlighted as a top ten area for clinical testing in septic shock by thought leaders 
in sepsis.(Perner et al., 2017)  
The rationale for this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is two-fold: (i) LIE may provide substrate for 
cholesterol synthesis and essential free fatty acids as metabolic fuel during septic stress, and (ii) fish oil LIE 
contains potent anti-inflammatory ω-3 fatty acids that have been associated with improved organ function and 
reduced mortality in sepsis.(Hall et al., 2015) Supporting rationale (i), a multi-center RCT of a phospholipid 
emulsion for gram-negative severe sepsis(Dellinger et al., 2009) initially demonstrated no effect on mortality, 
but when limited to patients with albumin ≥ 1.5 g/dL, and cholesterol ≥ 40 mg/dL or HDL-C ≥ 20 mg/dL, 
demonstrated sepsis mortality reductions of 6.6% (p < 0.025) and 10.8% (p< 0.005), respectively.(“Parker TS,” 
n.d.) That study establishes that adequate liver function and a minimum quantity of cholesterol are needed for 
effective lipid-mediated defense against sepsis. Supporting rationale (ii), a RCT of IV 10% fish oil in 60 ICU 
sepsis patients showed significant improvements in organ failure (all sepsis) and improved mortality (sub-
population) compared to placebo.(Hall et al., 2015) Therefore, the central hypothesis is that fish oil LIE will 
improve quantitative and qualitative lipid measures, provide substrate for bacterial toxin clearance and 
steroid synthesis, and lead to improvements in early organ function and mortality in sepsis patients. 
Our group has demonstrated access to the patient population needed for this study. In an ongoing 
collaborative study between UF JAX and the UF SCIRC, 120 of 223 (54%) sepsis patients met proposed 
enrollment criteria including total cholesterol ≤ 100 mg/dL. This pilot study will gather data for a multicenter 
clinical trial (R01) and has the following specific aims:  
 
Aim 1: Test if early fish oil LIE in sepsis patients will lead to achievement of 48-hour total cholesterol 
goals compared to controls. Recruit 48 moderate organ-failure sepsis patients  with adequate liver function 
(albumin > 1.5 mg/dL, total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL) within 24h of sepsis recognition and obtain demographics, 
interventions, and quantitative and qualitative cholesterol measures. Because we will use the hospital’s Sepsis 
Alert system, there may be up to 1084 subjects screened for inclusion in the study. For the Phase II trial, 48 
patients will be randomized to LIE (24 patients) or active control (24 patients - no drug). Quantitative lipid 
measures (total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides) will be measured (upon enrollment, 48h, 72h, and 7d 
after drug) to assess the ability of LIE to achieve delta total cholesterol (48-hr – enrollment) of 0 to +5 mg/dL 
based on preliminary data.  
 

08/13/2021 
 
4 of 19 
Aim 2: Test if sepsis patients will have a reduction in lipid oxidation measures, and improvements in 
HDL function, cumulative organ failure, and 28-day mortality after fish oil LIE versus controls. In 48 
patients (Aim 1), the following will be collected at enrollment, 48h and 7d after enrollment: (i) lipid oxidation 
(cell free assay), (ii) HDL function (cholesterol efflux assay), (iii) SOFA score, and (iv) 28-day mortality.  
 
2.0 BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE 
2.1 Sepsis is common, costly, and deadly. Recent published US estimates report up to 850,000 ED sepsis 
visits per year(Wang, Jones, & Donnelly, 2017) costing nearly 17 billion dollars. Sepsis is also lethal, resulting 
in death in approximately one of every four cases and nearly 215,000 deaths per year in the US.(Angus et al., 
2001)  
2.2 Sepsis causes organ dysfunction which leads to chronic critical illness and death.  In a prospective 
study of 115 sepsis patients from the UF Health Jacksonville (UF JAX) ED, 63% had organ dysfunction on 
admission, which was still present in 27% of survivors at 28-90 days. Notably, in-hospital mortality was 20%, 
but long-term mortality was 47% at 3 years.(Guirgis, Brakenridge, et al., 2016) The UF Sepsis and Critical 
Illness Research Center (P50 GM111152-02) has described chronic critical illness (CCI) in intensive care unit 
(ICU) patients with sepsis,  characterized by ICU stays ≥ 14 days, progressive cachexia, manageable organ 
dysfunction, and frequent indolent death.(Gentile et al., 2012; Mira et al., 2016) Clinical trajectories were early 
death (12%), rapid recovery (RAP) (29%), and CCI (59%).  
2.3 Preventing and limiting early organ dysfunction may prevent CCI and death. Early organ failure is 
strongly predictive of both progression to CCI and death.(Levy et al., 2005; Shapiro et al., 2006) SOFA score is 
a validated measure of organ dysfunction that directly relates to mortality(Angus et al., 2001; Shapiro et al., 
2006) and is used as an endpoint in clinical trials.(Marshall et al., 2005; Vincent, 2004) Furthermore, 
our group has demonstrated that early SOFA elevation is predictive of persistent organ dysfunction, and that 
early and post-resuscitation organ failure is also highly predictive of progression to CCI.(Guirgis et al., 2014; 
Stortz et al., 2017)  
2.4 Cholesterol protects against sepsis-associated 
organ dysfunction. Both LDL and HDL are protective 
against sepsis. Specifically LDL-C facilitates bacterial 
toxin clearance in sepsis via hepatic LDL receptors or 
via HDL (reverse cholesterol transport).(Boyd et al., 
2016; Feingold & Grunfeld, 1997; Weerapan 
Khovidhunkit et al., 2004; Walley et al., 2014) High 
density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is protective 
against sepsis by several mechanisms: i) bacterial toxin 
binding,(Catapano, Pirillo, Bonacina, & Norata, 2014; W 
Khovidhunkit et al., 2004) ii) suppression of 
inflammatory cell migration, iii) prevention of 
inflammatory cytokine release,(Murphy et al., 2008, 
2011) and inhibition of vascular and intercellular 
adhesion molecules expression,(Heitzer, Schlinzig, 
Krohn, Meinertz, & Münzel, 2001; Rosenson et al., 2015) and iv) stimulation of endogenous corticosteroid 
release.(Guo et al., 2013, 2014)  
2.5 Sepsis non-survivors have lower enrollment total cholesterol and LDL-C levels, which drop rapidly 
in the first 3 days (Figure 1). Conversely, survivors have higher baseline levels, which increase early after 
admission (223 UF sepsis patients). In addition, low LDL-C, total cholesterol, and HDL-C levels are associated 
with increased sepsis risk and poor outcomes after sepsis.(J.-Y. Chien, Jerng, Yu, & Yang, 2005b; Y.-F. Chien 
et al., 2015; Guirgis, Donnelly, et al., 2016; Lagrost et al., 2014; van Leeuwen et al., 2003) Decreased 
cholesterol levels also predict organ dysfunction and death from sepsis.(Weerapan Khovidhunkit et al., 2004)  
 
3.0 INNOVATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF RESEARCH 
3.1 Enhanced reverse cholesterol transport to improve sepsis outcomes. This study will describe for the 
first time a potential therapy which enhances reverse cholesterol transport to clear bacterial toxins. Reverse 
cholesterol transport is the process by which HDL actively uptakes lower density lipids (including bound 
bacterial toxins) from peripheral macrophages (foam cells) and transports them to the liver for elimination. This 
study will test the hypothesis that lipid emulsion administration will provide a substrate for bacterial toxin 

08/13/2021 
 
5 of 19 
binding during sepsis and steroid synthesis leading to improved reverse cholesterol transport through the liver 
as well as transport of cholesterol to the adrenal glands in sepsis. (Figure 2)                                                    
3.2 Fish oil lipid injectable emulsion for sepsis. Lipid-based therapies were recently highlighted as one of 
the top ten areas for future clinical testing in septic shock by thought leaders in sepsis.(Perner et al., 2017) 
Fish oil lipid emulsions contain anti-inflammatory long-chain ω-3 fatty acids, which  may be protective in 
sepsis.(Li et al., 2015; Shih et al., 2016) There are four main mechanisms for these effects: i) metabolism into 
anti-inflammatory eicosanoid inflammatory mediators, ii) alteration of membrane lipid rafts, iii) inhibition of 
nuclear receptor activation (nuclear factor [NF]–κB) to modulate production of inflammatory mediators, and, iv) 
metabolism into novel pro-resolving/anti-inflammatory mediators (resolvins and protectins). Exogenous 
administration of ω -3 may be necessary to overcome the massive inflammatory response that occurs during 
sepsis. A recent randomized controlled trial of 60 ICU sepsis patients demonstrated a significant improvement 
in organ failure after IV administration of 10% fish oil.(Hall et al., 2015)  
3.3 Fish-oil lipid emulsions may safely elevate cholesterol and improve outcomes in sepsis.(D’Ascenzo 
et al., 2014) This may be beneficial in sepsis as increased cholesterol and phospholipids have the potential to 
bind and clear bacterial toxins. In addition, low cholesterol levels are associated both with poor outcomes and 
increased sepsis risk.(J.-Y. Chien et al., 2005a; Y.-F. Chien et al., 2015; Guirgis, Dodani, et al., 2017; Guirgis, 
Donnelly, et al., 2016; Guirgis, Leeuwenburgh, et al., 
2017) It is not known, however, whether transiently 
elevating cholesterol will improve outcomes in sepsis. 
The proposed LIE contains medium chain triglycerides, 
ω-6, and ω-3 fatty acids and is FDA approved for IV 
nutrition in critically ill adults and has the potential to 
elevate cholesterol. A secondary analysis of a multi-
center, double-blinded phase II RCT of a phospholipid 
emulsion for gram-negative severe sepsis(Dellinger et 
al., 2009) demonstrated (patient subset with serum 
albumin ≥ 1.5 g/dL, and either a cholesterol ≥ 40 
mg/dL or HDL-C ≥ 20 mg/dL), a reduction in overall 
sepsis mortality by 6.6% (p < 0.025) and 10.8% (p< 
0.005), respectively.10  
3.4 Novel total cholesterol enrollment criteria and 
goals for a pilot sepsis clinical trial. To select for 
potential responders to LIE, baseline total cholesterol 
must be low upon enrollment. Based on preliminary 
data from 223 UF JAX ED and UF Surgical ICU sepsis 
patients, initial mean total cholesterol levels differed 
between survivors (89 mg/dL) and non-survivors (100 
mg/dL); and mean delta total cholesterol for survivors 
was + 5 mg/dL (95%CI 1-9) vs. -9 mg/dL (95%CI -22, 
+3, p = 0.012) for non-survivors over 48 hours. These data form the basis for the inclusion criteria of total 
cholesterol < 100 mg/dL, and goal delta total cholesterol of 0 to +5 mg/dL. This is the first clinical trial to use 
serum cholesterol levels to screen for sepsis patients who may respond to lipid-based therapy, and attempt to 
modulate cholesterol levels to improve outcomes. Furthermore, 54% of previous study patients (120/223) met 
proposed enrollment criteria.  
3.5 Phase I Study Findings. Our recently completed Phase I dose escalation study with a Bayesian Optimal 
Interval Design safely allocated 10 patients to increasing doses of Smoflipid (LIE) starting at 1.0 g/kg and 
escalating by 0.2 g/kg increments to 1.6 g/kg. Eight of the ten patients successfully completed the Phase I 
study, stopping short of the preplanned maximal dose of 1.8 g/kg at the recommendation of the DSMB. Of the 
two patients who did not complete the study protocol, one patient withdrew from the study and did not 
complete the first two doses of study drug and left the hospital against medical advice. The second patient was 
found to have a displaced gastrostomy tube in her abdomen and was taken emergently to the operating room. 
Her triglycerides were elevated at 451, which did not meet the prespecified criteria for a dose limiting toxicity of 
triglycerides > 1000 mg/dL. However, the safety monitor and PI agreed that it would not be prudent to 
administer a second dose of the study drug under the circumstances and also assessed that the 
hypertriglyceridemia was more likely due to peritonitis and potential pancreatitis than due to study drug 

08/13/2021 
 
6 of 19 
administration. Of the eight patients who completed two doses of the study drug at each of the four dose 
levels, results for the primary end point of 48-hour mean total cholesterol level were 66 mg/dL (SD 11.3) for 1.0 
g/kg, 95.5 (SD 4.9) for 1.2 g/kg, 72.5 (SD 20.5) for 1.4 g/kg, and 67 (SD 4.2) for 1.6 g/kg. Tests for significance 
were not performed, however graphical presentations of total cholesterol levels over time for each dose level 
are presented below.   
 
With regards to adverse events (AEs), there was one patient who died within 7 days of study enrollment 
and two patients who died within 28 days. Other serious adverse events (SAEs) included endotracheal 
intubation, a below the knee amputation, chest tube placement for a pleural effusion, and emergency surgery 
for a misplaced gastrostomy tube. None of the SAEs were deemed to be related to study interventions. 
Adverse events included hyperglycemia, anemia, elevated AST, elevated triglycerides, elevated bilirubin, 
intravenous catheter infiltration, and elevated PT/INR values. The most common possibly related AEs included 
elevated liver function tests. No patients met the prespecified criteria for a dose limiting toxicity. Please see full 
DSM report. At the recommendation of the DSM, the Phase I study was concluded at a maximal dose of 
1.6g/kg and did not proceed to 1.8 g/kg given the low likelihood of added benefit of dose escalation to 1.8g/kg 
body weight and feasibility issues with line infiltration given prolonged drug infusions with increasing doses. 
The DSM unanimously recommended proceeding to the Phase II study with the design outlined below. 
 
 
 
4.0 APPROACH AND RESEARCH DESIGN 
4.1 Design and Objectives. This is a prospective, pilot RCT of early infusion of LIE in early sepsis patients 
with moderate organ dysfunction (SOFA ≥ 4 with at least 2 points being new or sepsis with vasopressor 
dependence). The LIPIDS-P clinical trial will assess the following: 1) safety and tolerability of lipid injectable 
emulsion and adverse effects, 2) the drug’s ability to optimally, transiently elevate cholesterol, and 3) 
preliminary measures of biological activity and clinical outcomes. 
4.2 Study Settings, Screening and Enrollment. 
A. Adult ED at UF JAX is a high volume, high acuity ED which treats approximately 80,000 patients per year. 
From October 2013 through November 2015 the UF JAX ED treated 2665 cases of sepsis who were admitted. 
The UF JAX ED is the current site of enrollment for 3 prospective sepsis research studies (one RCT) and , 3 
full-time research coordinators, and 3 part-time research assistants experienced in sepsis studies, as well as a 
biomedical laboratory.  

08/13/2021 
 
7 of 19 
B. UF North ED in Jacksonville. The UF North ED is a high-volume community ED with approximately 55,000 
patient volume per year. The Research Division in the Department of Emergency Medicine is capable of 
enrolling patients from the UF North ED.  
  
C. Screening and Enrollment. The "Possible 
Sepsis" notification system as well as the Sepsis 
Alert systems will be used to identify patients for 
prospective enrollment into sepsis research 
studies. The "possible sepsis" notifications send 
hourly pages and generate a daily list of 
potentially septic patients throughout the 
hospital and is currently used by the Hospital 
Sepsis Taskforce. The Sepsis Alert system is 
activated when a patient is highly suspected of 
sepsis and is being managed with the hospital 
sepsis care bundle." For patients who meet all 
other inclusion and exclusion criteria a lipid 
panel will be obtained and added on to current 
lab tests to evaluate cholesterol criteria for 
enrollment.  
D. UF Jacksonville sepsis recruitment. UF 
JAX Emergency Dept. patients meeting 
criteria will be identified by the PI and Co-I 
(Dr. Black) and the research team who will 
be notified via pager. Prior to approaching 
the patient or the LAR for consent in the 
study, the clinical staff will approach the 
patient or LAR and ask them about their 
interest in hearing about the study. If the 
patient or LAR express interest, the 
research team will review eligibility criteria, 
and will seek consent.Time block sampling 
will be used to enroll patients between the 
hours of 7am and 12am, 7 days/week.45 The team has enrolled a mean of 5 patients per month in 
previous studies, including Dr. Guirgis’ K23 study.  
 
4.3. Enrollment Criteria.  
A. Inclusion Criteria: 1) age > 18, 2) primary diagnosis of sepsis and within 24 hours of sepsis recognition 
and treated with institutional sepsis algorithm, 3) SOFA score ≥ 4 with at least 2 points being new or sepsis 
with vasopressor dependence, 4) screening total cholesterol ≤ 100 mg/dL or HDL-C + LDL-C ≤ 70 mg/dL, 
Screening lipids will be billed to the study.  
B. Exclusion Criteria: 1) total bilirubin > 2 mg/dL, 2) serum albumin < 1.5 mg/dL, 3) hypersensitivity to fish, 
egg, soybean, or peanut protein, or to any of the active ingredients or excipients, 4) severe hyperlipidemia or 
severe disorders of lipid metabolism with serum triglycerides > 400 mg/dL, 5) alternative/confounding 
diagnosis causing shock or critical illness (e.g., myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus, massive 
hemorrhage, trauma), 6) significant traumatic brain injury (evidence of neurologic injury on CT scan and a GCS 
<8), 7) refractory shock (likely death within 12 hours), 8) advanced directives restricting aggressive care or 
treating physician deems aggressive care unsuitable, 9) anticipated requirement for surgery that would 
interfere with drug infusion, 10) severe primary blood coagulation disorder, 11) acute pancreatitis accompanied 
by hyperlipidemia, 12) acute thromboembolic disease, 13) uncontrollable source of sepsis (e.g., irreversible 
disease state such as unresectable dead bowel), 14) severe immunocompromised state (e.g. subject has 
neutropenia receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy with absolute neutrophil count < 500/ul or expected to decline to 
< 500/uL within the next 3 days), 15) pregnancy or lactation, 16) already receiving intravenous lipid 
formulations (e.g., TPN, propofol, clevidipine) will be excluded from the study as lipid infusion will interfere with 
interpretation of the study results, 17) Child Pugh Class B/C liver disease patients or liver transplant recipient , 

08/13/2021 
 
8 of 19 
18) actively on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or anticipated need for ECMO within 48 hours 
of enrollment. 
4.4 Protocol. The flow diagram (Figure 3) represents the primary research methodology. The research team 
will review eligibility criteria, and will seek the appropriate consent when criteria are met. Many sepsis 
patients may have altered mental status or pharmacologic sedation, but would be regarded as 
prospective research subjects. We ask for delayed consent only for the collection of a lipid panel for 
these potential subjects due to the severity of the illness, the vulnerable nature of the patient at this 
early time point, and the challenge in reaching the patient’s legal representatives. The lipid panel 
can frequently be added on to the patient's blood chemistry panel that nearly all septic patients 
already have as part of usual care. This means that it will usually not require an additional blood 
draw. In the unusual case that the patient does need an additional blood draw for the lipid panel, the 
blood will be drawn from existing venous access. For patients on whom a lipid panel is drawn prior 
to obtainment of written consent from the patient or LAR, we will seek written consent within 48 
hours. Three attempts will be made to locate the patient or family, and each attempt will be 
documented in the Data Collection Forms, as well as the time, method of contact, and date. If we are 
unable to obtain written consent within that time period, all data will be destroyed. Only the reason 
for the screen failure will be recorded. Due to potential conflict of interest (patent), the PI will refrain from 
recruiting, and consenting patients. For fully enrolled patients, the study drug will be infused as early as 
practical after study enrollment and within the first 24 hours of sepsis recognition. Hours for study enrollment 
are based on previously completed sepsis trials. Written informed consent and written authorization will be 
obtained from all patients or their legal representatives prior to drug infusion in compliance with the Declaration 
of Helsinki and the HIPAA privacy rule. Eligible patients must be enrolled within 24 hours of sepsis recognition.  
Standard of Care Treatment: All patients will be treated in the ED or in a monitored inpatient setting at UF JAX.  
All patients will undergo standard emergent interventions and treatment with institutional sepsis protocols, an 
institutional standard of care and comprised of early, evidence-based treatment of sepsis that is utilized 
hospital-wide. It has been shown to result in improved outcomes.(Croft et al., 2014; Guirgis, Jones, et al., 
2017)  
4.5 Investigational Treatment. Within 24 hours of sepsis recognition, eligible patients (or their legal 
representatives in the case of inability to consent) will be approached for study enrollment. If a LAR is utilized 
and the subject gains the capacity to consent, the subject will be re-consented. After informed consent the 
following study procedures will be followed: 
A. Treatment.  The LIE is Smoflipid (20% lipid emulsion for injection; Fresenius Kabi), which contains soybean 
oil, MCTs, olive oil, and fish oil in a 30:30:25:15 ratio. Smoflipid also contains 0.163 to 0.225 mg/mL of all-rac-
α-tocopherol. Initial infusion rate of LIE will occur at a rate of 0.5 mL/min for the first 30 minutes. If tolerated, 
the infusion will proceed at the maximum FDA approved rate of 0.11g/kg/hr, and not to exceed 0.5 mL/kg/hr. 
The proposed dose of LIE is based on current manufacturer recommended dosing for nutritional purposes for 
this specific drug. The approved dose range is 1 to 2 g/kg/day, and not to exceed 2.5 g/kg/day. Since this is a 
pilot study, and because the lipid emulsion appears white and will be visible to the treatment team, the study 
will not be blinded. All infusion bags and hospital equipment that will be used for administration of LIE are 
standard use in the hospital and approved by the FDA, and non-PVC tubing and a 1.2 micron in-line filter will 
be used. All study treatments will be administered either via an existing central venous catheter or via a single 
lumen peripheral intravenous catheter. This approved method of administration has been shown to be safe. 
B. Weight-based dosing. Dosing will be based on actual body weight in kilograms, except in cases of morbid 
obesity defined as actual weight (AW) > 200% ideal body weight (IBW). For morbidly obese patients, adjusted 
body weight (AdjBW) will be used for Smoflipid dosing according to the following formula:  
 
AdjBW = IBW + 0.4( ABW - IBW).  
Ideal body weight in (kg) will be calculated as follows.  
 
Males: IBW = 50 kg + 2.3 kg for each inch over 5 feet. 
 
Females: IBW = 45.5 kg + 2.3 kg for each inch over 5 feet. 
C. Adverse reactions: nausea, vomiting, hyperglycemia, flatulence, pyrexia, abdominal pain, 
increased blood triglycerides, hypertension, sepsis, dyspepsia, urinary tract infection, anemia and 
device related infection,  headache, sweating, dizziness, flushing, rash, urticaria, erythema, fish-like 
taste in mouth, coagulation defects.   
4.6 Investigational Measurements.  

08/13/2021 
 
9 of 19 
Blood Sampling. Blood will be drawn for cholesterol levels, lipid oxidation, HDL function, inflammatory 
biomarkers, and SOFA score (Appendix Table 1). For Jacksonville subjects only, if the subject is re-admitted 
to the hospital for sepsis within 6 months from the index visit, we may draw an additional amount, up to 10 mL, 
of blood when at the time of re-admission. The additional blood draw is to assess lipid biomarkers in the subset 
of patients who are readmitted for sepsis and compare them to their admission baseline. These additional 
samples will be processed by Research Assistants in the UF Health Jacksonville Biomedical Research 
Laboratory and stored in the Emergency Medicine Research Data and Tissue Bank. These additional tests will 
be of no additional cost to the subject. 
A. Cholesterol Levels. Blood will be drawn for serial lipid panels upon enrollment, then at 48 and 72h, and 
then at day 7. For patients discharged from the hospital prior to day 7, a phlebotomy service will be sent to the 
patient's place of residence (home, nursing facility, etc.) to draw their blood. 
B. Lipid Oxidation. Tests of lipid oxidation including HDL inflammatory index will be performed as in current 
studies at UCLA using the cell free assay as in previous studies(Navab et al., 2001) after preparation at UF. 
This will be drawn at enrollment, at 48h, as well as 7d later to assess change over time. To prevent oxidative 
degradation of the samples, an antioxidant buffer will be added to samples prior to storage. (Myzak & Carr, 
2002) 
C. HDL Function. The cholesterol efflux assay measures the ability of HDL to move lower density lipids from 
peripheral macrophages to the liver for clearance. HDL-mediated cellular cholesterol efflux assays will be 
performed to assess potential improvements in HDL function with LIE vs. control as in previous.(Guirgis, 
Leeuwenburgh, et al., 2017) 
D. SOFA Score. Assessment will occur at enrollment and 48h later as well as 7 days later to determine 
change in SOFA score over time as well as serum lactate. Necessary labs will be paid for by the study unless 
already ordered by the treating team. 
E. Future Testing. In addition, the patient or LAR will be presented with a consent for a biobank study for 
future testing should they choose to participate. The biobank, Emergency Medicine Research Data and Tissue 
Bank, has previously been approved by the UF Jacksonville IRB and has been assigned study number 
IRB201601987.  
Stool Sampling. A stool sample will be collected for determining lipid absorption within 24 hours of each time 
point when available (enrollment, 48h, 7 days) utilizing standard of care procedures by nursing and medical 
technicians. 
4.7 Comparison Group. Phase II of this study will randomize patients to receive one of three doses of LIE or 
no investigational drug. The control group will receive all standard treatments mandated by the institutional 
Sepsis Alert protocol. For purposes of statistical outcomes analysis, the control group will be the comparison 
group. 
4.8 Efficacy Endpoints 
A. Primary Endpoints 
 
Delta (48h - enrollment) serum total cholesterol of 0 to 5 mg/dL 
B. Secondary Endpoints 
 
Lipid oxidation (HDL inflammatory index) 
 
HDL function (cholesterol efflux capacity) 
 
Change in SOFA score over the first 48h and 7 days 
 
In-hospital mortality  
 
Change in cholesterol level from enrollment to 7 days 
4.9 Study Procedures. 
A. Randomization  
Phase II of this study/trial will use an adaptive design. As the study progresses, the dose of the study drug 
that proves least efficacious for stabilizing cholesterol levels will be dropped. For the first 24 patients, patients 
will be randomized to receive one of three doses of the study drug, or no drug (active control). The first 24 
patients will be randomized using the following allocations: 4:4:4:12. From the first 24 patients, we will select 
the two doses that have the best performance in the primary endpoint, Delta (48h - enrollment) serum total 
cholesterol of 0 to 5 mg/dL, among the ones that are acceptable in safety. We will also evaluate Delta SOFA 
score at 48 hours (organ failure score, from 48h-enrollment) as well as Delta 7 days for serum total cholesterol 
(7 day – enrollment) to select the two most efficacious doses. For the last 24 patients in the study, patients will 
be randomized to receive one of the two most efficacious doses of study drug based on results from the first 24 
patients in the following manner: 6:6:12, or no drug (active control). The overall study groups will include 24 

08/13/2021 
 
10 of 19 
patients in the experimental arm and 24 patients in the control arm as originally designed. The study will 
employ a permuted blocked randomization technique. Permuted blocked randomization has several 
advantages in that it supports group balance at the end of the trial and it supports continuous balance during 
trial progression by assuring that sequential patients are distributed equally between groups. The study 
statistician will generate the randomization sequence that will be stored in REDCap and accessed by the study 
coordinators at the time of patient enrollment.  
B. Blinding. Because this is a pilot study, and because the lipid emulsion appears white and will be visible to 
the treatment team, the study will not be blinded. Data abstractors will, however, be blinded to the treatment 
effect. As the treatment effects are objective measurements (lipid levels, SOFA score, etc.) the likelihood of 
bias is low.  
C. Drug Accountability. The drug for this study will be supplied by the hospital pharmacy and paid for by the 
study. A SOP will be used to track lot numbers of LIE administered.  
  
D. Sample Size. Our preliminary data suggests that with proposed enrollment criteria, patients experienced an 
average decrease of 17 mg/dL (SD = 23) in cholesterol at 48 hours. If the treatment group can stop the decline 
or increase by 2 mg/dL in cholesterol, which correspond to between group difference with Cohen’s effect size 
of 0.74 or 0.83. Then, at a significance level of 0.05, 24 patients in each arm (N = 48) will be able to detect the 
difference at 71% or 80% power, respectively. Recruitment feasibility: Based upon extensive prior work by the 
senior PI at the research hospital, we expect to enroll approximately 2 patients/month and all study patients 
within 4 years.  
E. Safety Monitoring. This study will employ a Data Safety Monitoring Plan (see full plan at end of study 
protocol) that includes a primary physician safety monitor (not a co-investigator) who will have expertise in 
critical care and the study drug. The DSM plan also includes a second safety monitor (not a co-investigator) 
who is a clinical trialist who also has experience in critical care. The third member of the DSM plan is a 
biostatistician with experience in clinical trials and critical care studies and with prior DSMB experience. All 
DSM meetings to evaluate for safety will be coordinated by the study monitor. Since the Phase I study has 
been completed (10 patients) and the DSM has approved the start of Phase II, subsequent meetings will occur 
after the thirtieth, and forty fifth patients are enrolled and after study completion. The DSM will have the 
authority to make one of three written recommendations to the study PI after each meeting: suspend the study, 
continue the study without restriction, or continue the study with contingency on review of additional data 
regarding adverse events, adjustments to the protocol, or individual patient’s clinical history. 
AE and SAE Monitoring 
Any reaction deemed to be severe (as listed below) and related to the drug infusion while it is being infused, 
will result in discontinuation of the study drug after discussion with the PI. Potential expected AEs include the 
following:  
1. Hypersensitivity reactions resulting in facial, head or neck swelling, airway compromise, shortness of 
breath or hypoxia will result in cessation of drug infusion on a study patient. No patients experience 
allergic drug reactions will continue to receive or receive additional doses of study drug.  
Dose Escalation and Dose-Limiting Toxicities include: 
2. Respiratory distress or hypoxia occurring very soon after initiation of study drug.  
3. Fat Overload or Hypertriglyceridemia (> 1000 mg/dL) 
4. Parenteral nutrition associated liver disease or hepatitis characterized by a marked elevation of liver 
function tests or total bilirubin. 
For AEs that do not meet criteria of SAEs or deemed to be “not related” or “possibly related” the PI and Co-
Investigators will make decisions regarding management based on the clinical scenario (See DSMP Adverse 
Events Monitoring Section I).  
"Hypersensitivity reactions resulting in facial, head or neck swelling, airway compromise" as detailed in the AE 
and SAE monitoring section. Though considered SAEs, these will not be considered dose limiting toxicities as 
allergic reactions are not dose-related. Therefore dose escalation in the Phase I study can continue even if a 
patient experiences a hypersensitivity reaction. Hypersensitivity reactions, when severe as defined above, will 
however result in stopping of the study drug. 
F. Patient Bedside Monitoring.  
 
Only patients admitted to a monitored inpatient setting or ICU an ICU setting will be enrolled in the 
study to ensure adequate monitoring during and after drug infusion.  
 
Laboratory monitoring will occur under the supervision of the study pharmacist or nutritionist with 
experience using the proposed LIE. The following laboratory measures will be monitored for the first 48 

08/13/2021 
 
11 of 19 
hours: serum triglycerides, fluid and electrolyte status, blood glucose, liver and kidney function, blood 
count including platelets, and coagulation parameters.  
 
Bedside nurse monitoring will occur for the first hour of drug infusion on day 1 of the study. Nurse 
monitoring will include monitoring for all of the following: tachypnea, dyspnea, hypoxia, bronchospasm, 
tachycardia, hypotension, cyanosis, vomiting, nausea, headache, sweating, dizziness, altered 
mentation, flushing, rash, urticaria, erythema, pyrexia, or chills. Vascular access will also be monitored 
for thrombophlebitis, erythema, pain. 
G. Statistical Analysis. The primary method of analysis will be using an unpaired t-test of change in mean 
lipid levels between the groups (48 hours – enrollment) and Wilcoxon ranksum test between groups for change 
in SOFA score (48 hours – enrollment). Normally distributed numerical data will be compared using unpaired t-
test while non-normally distributed data will be compared using Wilcoxon’s ranksum. Finally categorical data 
will be compared using Chi squared test. For all statistical tests P<0.05 will be considered significant. 
H. Trial Organization. This study will be conducted at UF JAX and overseen by Faheem W. Guirgis, MD.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

08/13/2021 
 
12 of 19 
 
 
 
 
 
I. Data Safety Monitoring Plan 
OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES 
Trial Oversight is provided by the Principal Investigator (PI), Dr. Faheem W. Guirgis, MD, and 
Frederick A. Moore, MD, and Dr. Lauren Black, MD (“co-investigators” throughout). 
The Safety Monitors are Dr. Sophia Sheikh, MD (primary) and Dr. Dominick Angiolillo, MD 
(secondary).  
The Study Statisticians are Dr. Shiva Gautam, PhD at UF JAX and Dr. Sam Wu, PhD at UF Health 
(Gainesville). 
The Study Monitor is Ms. Morgan Henson, MPH, CCRP.  
 
MONITORING PROCEDURES 
Dr. Guirgis assures that informed consent is obtained prior to performing any research procedures, 
that all subjects meet eligibility criteria, and that the study is conducted according to the IRB-approved 
research plan. Study data will be accessible at all times for the PI and co-investigators to review. The 
PI and co-investigators will review study conduct including participant accrual, drop-outs, and protocol 
deviations on a weekly, basis. The primary safety monitor (Dr. Sheikh) will review AEs individually in 
real-time. Both safety monitors (Sheikh and Angiolillo) will review AEs in aggregate on a monthly 
basis. The safety monitors will also review serious adverse events (SAEs) including dose-limiting 
toxicities and drug-related effects. Co-investigators, safety monitors, as well as the study pharmacist 
or nutritionist will monitor for laboratory abnormalities including serum triglycerides, fluid and 
electrolyte status, blood glucose, liver and kidney function, blood count including platelets, and 
coagulation parameters throughout treatment (first 48 hours). The PI ensures all protocol deviations, 
AEs, and SAEs are reported to the IRB according to the applicable regulatory requirements. 
 
COLLECTION, SPECIFICATION, AND REPORTING OF SAEs AND AEs 
Specification of Safety Variables  
Safety assessments will consist of monitoring and reporting adverse events (AEs) and serious 
adverse events (SAEs) that are considered related to LIE, all events of death, and any study specific 
issue of concern. 
 
 
Adverse Events 
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the 
use of LIE in this study. The study-specific definition of “temporally related” includes up to twelve 
hours after discontinuation of LIE infusion. 
 
This includes the following: 
 AEs not previously observed in the subject that emerge during the protocol-specified AE reporting 
period.  
 If applicable, AEs that occur prior to assignment of study treatment associated with medication 
washout, no treatment run-in, or other protocol-mandated intervention. 
 Preexisting medical conditions (other than the condition being studied) judged by the investigator 
to have worsened in severity or frequency or changed in character during the protocol-specified 
AE reporting period. 
 Laboratory values that are abnormal to a degree such that the value falls into the range specified 
as abnormal by local standards, and the abnormality leads to specific medical corrective action.  
 

08/13/2021 
 
13 of 19 
Serious Adverse Events 
An AE should be classified as an SAE if: 
 It results in death (i.e., the AE actually causes or leads to death).  
 It is life threatening (i.e., the AE, in the view of the investigator, places the subject at immediate 
risk of death.  It does not include an AE that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have 
caused death.). 
 It requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization. 
 It results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (i.e., the AE results in substantial 
disruption of the subject’s ability to conduct normal life functions). 
 It results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to 
the investigational product. 
 It is considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment 
(e.g., may jeopardize the subject or may require medical/surgical intervention to prevent one of 
the outcomes listed above). 
 
Methods and Timing for Assessing AND Recording Safety variables 
The investigator is responsible for ensuring that all AEs and SAEs that are observed or reported 
during the study are collected and reported to the FDA, appropriate IRB(s) in accordance with CFR 
312.32 (IND Safety Reports).  
 
Adverse Event Reporting Period 
The reporting period for all study-defined adverse events will begin at the time of LIE infusion and for 
12 hours after the second infusion on day 2 of the study. Patients will then be followed until the longer 
of 7 days or discharge. AEs will be captured by the research nurse or study team during and after the 
two study drug infusions and by review of the hospital chart.  
 
Assessment of Adverse Events 
All AEs whether volunteered by the subject, discovered by study personnel during questioning, or 
detected through physical examination, laboratory test, or other means will be reported up until 12 
hours after LIE. Abnormal laboratory values will be considered an AE if the value falls into an 
abnormal range based upon the hospital’s laboratory standards, and the abnormality was not 
preexisting prior to enrollment, and the abnormality leads to a new treatment within the AE time 
frame.  
 
Each reported SAE will be described by its duration (i.e., start and end dates), regulatory seriousness 
criteria if applicable, suspected relationship to LIE and actions taken. To ensure consistency of SAE 
causality assessments, investigators will apply the following general guideline: 
 
AEs are graded according to the following severity scale: 
  
Mild: An experience that is transient, and requires no special treatment or intervention. The 
experience does not generally interfere with usual daily activities. This includes transient laboratory 
test alterations. 
 
Moderate: An experience that is alleviated with simple therapeutic treatments. The experience 
impacts usual daily activities. Includes laboratory test alterations indicating injury, but without long-
term risk. 
 

08/13/2021 
 
14 of 19 
Severe: An experience that requires therapeutic intervention. The experience interrupts usual daily 
activities. If hospitalization (or prolongation of hospitalization) is required for treatment it becomes an 
SAE. 
 
The study uses the following AE attribution scale: 
 
Not related: the AE is clearly not related to the study procedures (i.e., another cause of the event is 
most plausible and/or a clinically plausible temporal sequence is inconsistent with the onset of the 
event). 
 
More likely than not related: an event that follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the initiation 
of study procedures, but that could readily have been produced by a number of other factors.  
 
Related: The AE is clearly related to the study procedures. 
 
Sepsis Related Exempted Events  
The following signs, symptoms, observations and events are frequently observed in association with 
sepsis and are exempted from regulatory reporting unless known to be caused by the study drug: 
dyspnea, chest pain, fever, hypoxemia, rapid pulse, rapid respiratory rate, dizziness, syncope, altered 
mental status, seizure, confusion, anxiety, generalized weakness, anorexia, nausea, abdominal pain, 
back pain, constipation, vomiting, pneumonia, skin infection, cancer, surgery not related to treatment 
of sepsis, electrocardiography abnormalities (atrial arrhythmias, right bundle branch block, and ST 
and T wave changes), elevated troponin level, elevated BNP or NT ProBNP level, high white blood 
cell count, pulmonary infiltrate, pleural effusion, cardiomegaly, need for oxygen therapy, need for 
vasopressor, need for blood product transfusion, need for inotropic therapy, need for mechanical 
ventilation, need for physical or occupational therapy. 
 
Expected AEs associated with the study drug (Smoflipid) include: nausea, vomiting, 
hyperglycemia, flatulence, pyrexia, abdominal pain, increased blood triglycerides, hypertension, 
sepsis, dyspepsia, urinary tract infection, anemia and device related infection,  headache, sweating, 
dizziness, flushing, rash, urticaria, erythema, in real-time which will be recorded by the research 
nurse and research team.  
 
AE Management 
Any AE classified as an SAE (as per above definitions) and deemed to be related to the drug infusion 
will result in discontinuation of the study drug after discussion with the PI. Potential expected AEs 
include the following:  
1. Hypersensitivity reactions resulting in rash, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath or hypoxia 
2. Respiratory distress or hypoxia occurring very soon after initiation of study drug  
3. Dose Escalation and Dose-Limiting Toxicities including Fat Overload, Hypertriglyceridemia, and 
Refeeding Complications 
4. Parenteral nutrition associated liver disease or hepatitis characterized by an elevation of liver function 
tests or total bilirubin 
 
For AEs that do not meet criteria of SAEs or deemed to be “not related” or “possibly related” the PI 
and Co-Investigators will make decisions regarding management based on the clinical scenario.  
 
Procedures for eliciting, recording, and reporting adverse events 
Specific Instructions for Recording Adverse Events 
Investigators will use correct medical terminology/concepts when reporting AEs or SAEs.  Avoid 
colloquialisms and abbreviations. 

08/13/2021 
 
15 of 19 
a. 
Diagnosis vs. Signs and Symptoms 
If known at the time of reporting, a diagnosis will be reported rather than individual signs and 
symptoms. However, if a constellation of signs and/or symptoms cannot be medically characterized 
as a single diagnosis or syndrome at the time of reporting, it will be reported based upon the 
information that is currently available.  If a diagnosis is subsequently established, it will be reported as 
follow-up information. 
b. 
Deaths 
All deaths that are “more likely than not” related to the study and that occur during the protocol-
specified AE reporting period will be reported to the appropriate parties. 
When recording a death, the event or condition that caused or contributed to the fatal outcome will be 
reported as the single medical concept.  If the cause of death is unknown and cannot be ascertained 
at the time of reporting, report “Unexplained Death”. 
c. 
Preexisting Medical Conditions 
A preexisting medical condition is one that is present at the start of the study.  Such conditions will be 
reported as medical and surgical history. 
A preexisting medical condition will be re-assessed throughout the trial and reported as an AE or SAE 
only if the frequency, severity, or character of the condition worsens during the study.  When reporting 
such events, it is important to convey the concept that the preexisting condition has changed by 
including applicable descriptors (e.g., “more frequent headaches”). 
d. 
Hospitalizations for Medical or Surgical Procedures 
Any AE that results in prolonged hospitalization will be documented and reported as an SAE. If a 
subject is hospitalized to undergo a medical or surgical procedure as a result of an AE, the event 
responsible for the procedure, not the procedure itself, will be reported as the SAE.   
Hospitalizations for the following reasons do not require reporting: Prolonged hospitalization for 
diagnostic or elective surgical procedures for preexisting conditions, or hospitalization or prolonged 
hospitalization for scheduled therapy of the target disease of the study. 
e. 
Pregnancy 
Pregnant patients will be excluded from study. In women of child-bearing age who have a uterus, 
pregnancy can be excluded by either urine pregnancy testing or appropriate history of abstinence, 
contraception with reliable menstrual history. 
f. 
Post-Study Adverse Events 
The investigator will expeditiously report any SAE occurring after a subject has completed or 
discontinued study participation if attributed to prior LIE. 
If the investigator becomes aware of the development of cancer or a congenital anomaly in a 
subsequently conceived offspring of a female subject who participated in the study, this will be 
reported as an SAE.  
 
Data Quality Assurance and monitoring plan 
Accurate, consistent, and reliable data will be ensured through the use of standard practices and 
procedures.  The CRF will be populated in hand by an appropriately qualified study coordinator. To 
qualify, the coordinator must be trained in Good Clinical Practice (GCP), and listed on the IRB-
approved protocol, and must have a bachelor’s degree from college and a clinical degree (e.g., 
coordinator, MD, or PA). Currently, our Division of Research employs 4 GCP-trained study 
coordinators. Study coordinators will receive a training course via teleconference. This course will 
present the methods for accurate completion of CRFs and expected gray-zone issues with data entry, 
and the coordinators will receive a guidance document for completing the CRF.  Data for CRFs will 
derive from one of two source documents, either the study collection template, which will contain data 
obtained by interview by a study coordinator, or the medical record. Sites will keep certified copies of 
medical records relevant to the reporting period.  Sites will maintain CRFs to allow a study monitor to 
inspect.  
 

08/13/2021 
 
16 of 19 
Safety Monitoring 
The Data Safety Monitoring Plan that includes a primary physician safety monitor (not a co-investigator) who 
will have expertise in critical care and the study drug. The DSM plan also includes a second safety monitor (not 
a co-investigator) who is a clinical trialist who also has experience in critical care. The third member of the 
DSM plan is a biostatistician with experience in clinical trials and critical care studies and with prior DSMB 
experience. All DSM meetings to evaluate for safety will be coordinated by the study monitor. The primary 
safety monitor will review the study data and procedures after the first patient is enrolled to evaluate the case 
history and any adverse events. The DSM will then meet after the fourth and eighth patient are enrolled, and at 
completion of the Phase I study for which results will be submitted to the IRB as a miscellaneous reportable 
event. Once the DSM makes the decision to move the study to Phase II, that recommendation will be 
submitted to the IRB, and IRB approval will be required for Phase II initiation.  Subsequent meetings will occur 
after the thirtieth, and forty fifth patients are enrolled and after study completion. The DSM will have the 
authority to make one of three written recommendations to the study PI after each meeting: suspend the study, 
continue the study without restriction, or continue the study with contingency on review of additional data 
regarding adverse events, adjustments to the protocol, or individual patient’s clinical history. The DSM can 
make additional recommendations regarding safety or study conduct as indicated for the safe and successful 
completion of the trial.  
 
Data Safety Monitoring Board reports for Phase I will be submitted to the IRB for review prior to the start of the 
Phase II portion of the project. 
 
Statistical Analysis 
The primary method of analysis will be using an unpaired t-test of change in mean lipid levels between the 
groups (48 hours – enrollment) and Wilcoxon ranksum test between groups for change in SOFA score (48 
hours – enrollment). Normally distributed numerical data will be compared using unpaired t-test while non-
normally distributed data will be compared using Wilcoxon’s ranksum. Finally, categorical data will be 
compared using Chi squared test. For all statistical tests P<0.05 will be considered significant. 
 
Review Board 
This study will be reviewed by the UF Health Jacksonville IRB. 
 
Table 1. Schedule of Events 
Assay 
Serum 
(SST) 
Plasma 
Screen 
T0 
 
T48 
T72 
7 Days 
28 days 
Hospital Processed 
Labs 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total cholesterol 
 
 
■ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hepatic function: 
total bilirubin and 
albumin 
 
 
■ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lipid Panels 
 
 
 
■ 
 
■ 
■ 
■ 
 
SOFA – platelet, 
creatinine, total 
bilirubin (if SOC 
labs not available 
for SOFA 
calculation) 
 
 
 
■ 
 
■ 
 
■ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research Processed 
Labs and Procedures 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lipid absorption 
(from stool 
samples) 
 
 
 
■ 
 
■ 
 
■ 
 

08/13/2021 
 
17 of 19 
 
 
 
 
 
Table 2. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score.  
SOFA Score 
0 
1 
2 
3 
4 
Respiratory 
PaO2/FiO2  
SpO2/FiO2 
 
>400 
         
>302 
 
 
<400 
<302 
 
<300 
<221 
 
<200 
<142 
 
<100 
<67 
Cardiovascular 
MAP ≥ 70 
mm Hg 
MAP ≤ 70 
mm Hg 
 
Dopamine ≤5 
or ANY 
Dobutamine 
 
Dopamine >5 or 
Norepinephrine ≤0.1 
Phenylephrine ≤0.8 
Dopamine >15 or 
Norepinephrine >0.1 
Phenylephrine >0.8 
ANY Vasopressin 
Liver Function 
Bilirubin, mg/dL 
< 1.2 
1.2-1.9 
2.0-5.9 
6.0-11.9 
> 12 
Renal 
Creatinine, 
mg/dL 
< 1.2 
1.2-1.9 
2.0-3.4 
3.5-4.9 
>5.0 
Coagulation 
Platelets x 
103/mm3 
≥ 150 
<150 
< 100 
<50 
<20 
Neurologic 
GCS 
15 
13-14 
10-12 
6-9 
<6 
 
References 
Angus, D. C., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., Lidicker, J., Clermont, G., Carcillo, J., & Pinsky, M. R. (2001). Epidemiology 
of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. 
Critical Care Medicine, 29(7), 1303–1310. 
Boyd, J. H., Fjell, C. D., Russell, J. A., Sirounis, D., Cirstea, M. S., & Walley, K. R. (2016). Increased Plasma 
PCSK9 Levels Are Associated with Reduced Endotoxin Clearance and the Development of Acute Organ 
Failures during Sepsis. Journal of Innate Immunity, 8(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442976 
Catapano, A. L., Pirillo, A., Bonacina, F., & Norata, G. D. (2014). HDL in innate and adaptive immunity. 
Cardiovascular Research. https://doi.org/cvu150 [pii] 
Chien, J.-Y., Jerng, J.-S., Yu, C.-J., & Yang, P.-C. (2005a). Low serum level of high-density lipoprotein 
cholesterol is a poor prognostic factor for severe sepsis. Critical Care Medicine, 33(8), 1688–1693. 
Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16096442 
Chien, J.-Y., Jerng, J.-S., Yu, C.-J., & Yang, P.-C. (2005b). Low serum level of high-density lipoprotein 
cholesterol is a poor prognostic factor for severe sepsis. Critical Care Medicine, 33(8), 1688–1693. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000171183.79525.6B 
Chien, Y.-F., Chen, C.-Y., Hsu, C.-L., Chen, K.-Y., & Yu, C.-J. (2015). Decreased serum level of lipoprotein 
cholesterol is a poor prognostic factor for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia that 
required intensive care unit admission. Journal of Critical Care, 30(3), 506–510. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.001 
Lipid oxidation and 
HDL function 
■ 
 
 
■ 
 
■ 
 
■ 
 
Phone follow up  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
■ 

08/13/2021 
 
18 of 19 
Croft, C. A., Moore, F. A., Efron, P. A., Marker, P. S., Gabrielli, A., Westhoff, L. S., … McKinley, B. A. (2014). 
Computer versus paper system for recognition and management of sepsis in surgical intensive care. The 
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 76(2), 311–319. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000121 
D’Ascenzo, R., Savini, S., Biagetti, C., Bellagamba, M. P., Marchionni, P., Pompilio, A., … Carnielli, V. P. 
(2014). Higher Docosahexaenoic acid, lower Arachidonic acid and reduced lipid tolerance with high doses 
of a lipid emulsion containing 15% fish oil: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Nutrition, 33(6), 1002–1009. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2014.01.009 
Dellinger, R. P., Tomayko, J. F., Angus, D. C., Opal, S., Cupo McDermott, S., Ducher, A., … Lipid Infusion and 
Patient Outcomes in Sepsis, I. (2009). Efficacy and safety of a phospholipid emulsion (GR270773) in 
Gram-negative severe sepsis: results of a phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-
finding clinical trial. Critical Care Medicine, 37(11), 2929–2938. Retrieved from 
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=cctr&AN=CN-00731688 
Feingold, K. R., & Grunfeld, C. (1997). Lipoproteins: are they important components of host defense? 
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 26(6), 1685–1686. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510260647 
Gentile, L. F., Cuenca, A. G., Efron, P. A., Ang, D., Bihorac, A., McKinley, B. A., … Moore, F. A. (2012). 
Persistent inflammation and immunosuppression: a common syndrome and new horizon for surgical 
intensive care. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 72(6), 1491–1501. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318256e000 
Guirgis, F. W., Brakenridge, S., Sutchu, S., Khadpe, J. D., Robinson, T., Westenbarger, R., … Jones, A. E. 
(2016). The long-term burden of severe sepsis and septic shock: Sepsis recidivism and organ 
dysfunction. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001135 
Guirgis, F. W., Dodani, S., Moldawer, L., Leeuwenburgh, C., Bowman, J., Kalynych, C., … Moore, F. A. (2017). 
Exploring the Predictive Ability of Dysfunctional High Density Lipoprotein for Adverse Outcomes in 
Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis. SHOCK, 1. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000887 
Guirgis, F. W., Donnelly, J. P., Dodani, S., Howard, G., Safford, M. M., Levitan, E. B., & Wang, H. E. (2016). 
Cholesterol levels and long-term rates of community-acquired sepsis. Critical Care, 20(1), 408. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1579-8 
Guirgis, F. W., Jones, L., Esma, R., Weiss, A., McCurdy, K., Ferreira, J., … Gray-Eurom, K. (2017). Managing 
sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives. Journal of Critical 
Care. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.005 
Guirgis, F. W., Khadpe, J. D., Kuntz, G. M., Wears, R. L., Kalynych, C. J., & Jones, A. E. (2014). Persistent 
organ dysfunction after severe sepsis: a systematic review. Journal of Critical Care, 29(3), 320–326. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.020 
Guirgis, F. W., Leeuwenburgh, C., Grijalva, V., Bowman, J., Kalynych, C., Moldawer, L., … Reddy, S. T. 
(2017). HDL Cholesterol Efflux is Impaired in Older Patients with Early Sepsis. SHOCK, 1. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001030 
Guo, L., Ai, J., Zheng, Z., Howatt, D. a., Daugherty, A., Huang, B., & Li, X. A. (2013). High density lipoprotein 
protects against polymicrobe-induced sepsis in mice. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288(25), 17947–
17953. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.442699 
Guo, L., Zheng, Z., Ai, J., Howatt, D. A., Mittelstadt, P. R., Thacker, S., … Li, X.-A. (2014). Scavenger receptor 
BI and high-density lipoprotein regulate thymocyte apoptosis in sepsis. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and 
Vascular Biology, 34(5), 966–975. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302484 
Hall, T. C., Bilku, D. K., Al-Leswas, D., Neal, C. P., Horst, C., Cooke, J., … Dennison, A. R. (2015). A 
Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effects of Parenteral Fish Oil on Survival Outcomes in 
Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 39(3), 301–312. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607113518945 
Heitzer, T., Schlinzig, T., Krohn, K., Meinertz, T., & Münzel, T. (2001). Endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, 
and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation, 104, 2673–2678. 
https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4601.099485 
Khovidhunkit, W., Kim, M.-S., Memon, R. A., Shigenaga, J. K., Moser, A. H., Feingold, K. R., & Grunfeld, C. 
(2004). Effects of infection and inflammation on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: mechanisms and 
consequences to the host. Journal of Lipid Research, 45, 1169–1196. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R300019-

08/13/2021 
 
19 of 19 
JLR200 
Khovidhunkit, W., Kim, M. S., Memon, R. A., Shigenaga, J. K., Moser, A. H., Feingold, K. R., & Grunfeld, C. 
(2004). Effects of infection and inflammation on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: mechanisms and 
consequences to the host. Journal of Lipid Research, 45(7), 1169–1196. 
https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R300019-JLR200 [doi] 
Lagrost, L., Girard, C., Grosjean, S., Masson, D., Deckert, V., Gautier, T., … Bonithon-Kopp, C. (2014). Low 
preoperative cholesterol level is a risk factor of sepsis and poor clinical outcome in patients undergoing 
cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Critical Care Medicine, 42(5), 1065–1073. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000165 
Levy, M. M., Macias, W. L., Vincent, J.-L., Russell, J. a, Silva, E., Trzaskoma, B., & Williams, M. D. (2005). 
Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Critical Care Medicine, 33(10), 
2194–2201. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000182798.39709.84 
Li, X., Zhang, X., Yang, E., Zhang, N., Cao, S., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Fish oil–supplemented parenteral nutrition 
could alleviate acute lung injury, modulate immunity, and reduce inflammation in rats with abdominal 
sepsis. Nutrition Research, 35(9), 784–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2015.06.008 
Marshall, J. C., Vincent, J. L., Guyatt, G., Angus, D. C., Abraham, E., Bernard, G., … Boers, M. (2005). 
Outcome measures for clinical research in sepsis: A report of the 2nd Cambridge Colloquium of the 
International Sepsis Forum. Critical Care Medicine, 33(8), 1708–1716. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000174478.70338.03 
Mira, J. C., Gentile, L. F., Mathias, B. J., Efron, P. A., Brakenridge, S. C., Mohr, A. M., … Moldawer, L. L. 
(2016). Sepsis Pathophysiology, Chronic Critical Illness, and Persistent Inflammation-Immunosuppression 
and Catabolism Syndrome. Critical Care Medicine, XX(13), 1–10. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002074 
Murphy, A. J., Woollard, K. J., Hoang, A., Mukhamedova, N., Stirzaker, R. a., McCormick, S. P. a, … Chin-
Dusting, J. (2008). High-density lipoprotein reduces the human monocyte inflammatory response. 
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 28(11), 2071–2077. 
https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.168690 
Murphy, A. J., Woollard, K. J., Suhartoyo, A., Stirzaker, R. a., Shaw, J., Sviridov, D., & Chin-Dusting, J. P. F. 
(2011). Neutrophil activation is attenuated by high-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein A-I in in vitro and 
in vivo models of inflammation. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 31(6), 1333–1341. 
https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.226258 
Myzak, M. C., & Carr, A. C. (2002). Myeloperoxidase-dependent caspase-3 activation and apoptosis in HL-60 
cells: protection by the antioxidants ascorbate and (dihydro)lipoic acid. Redox Report : Communications in 
Free Radical Research, 7(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100002125000181 
Navab, M., Hama, S. Y., Hough, G. P., Subbanagounder, G., Reddy, S. T., & Fogelman, A. M. (2001). A cell-
free assay for detecting HDL that is dysfunctional in preventing the formation of or inactivating oxidized 
phospholipids. Journal of Lipid Research, 42(8), 1308–1317. 
Parker TS. (n.d.). 
Perner, A., Gordon, A. C., Angus, D. C., Lamontagne, F., Machado, F., Russell, J. A., … Singer, M. (2017). 
The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock. Intensive Care Medicine, 43(9), 1294–
1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4821-1 
Rosenson, R. S., Brewer, H. B., Ansell, B. J., Barter, P., Chapman, M. J., Heinecke, J. W., … Webb, N. R. 
(2015). Dysfunctional HDL and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 13(1), 
48–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2015.124 
Shapiro, N., Howell, M. D., Bates, D. W., Angus, D. C., Ngo, L., & Talmor, D. (2006). The association of sepsis 
syndrome and organ dysfunction with mortality in emergency department patients with suspected 
infection. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 48(5), 583–90, 590.e1. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.007 
Shih, J.-M., Shih, Y.-M., Pai, M.-H., Hou, Y.-C., Yeh, C.-L., & Yeh, S.-L. (2016). Fish Oil-Based Fat Emulsion 
Reduces Acute Kidney Injury and Inflammatory Response in Antibiotic-Treated Polymicrobial Septic Mice. 
Nutrients, 8(3), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8030165 
Stortz, J. A., Mira, J. C., Raymond, S. L., Loftus, T. J., Ozrazgat-Baslanti, T., Wang, Z., … Brakenridge, S. C. 
(2017). Benchmarking clinical outcomes and the immunocatabolic phenotype of chronic critical illness 
after sepsis in surgical intensive care unit patients. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001758 

08/13/2021 
 
20 of 19 
van Leeuwen, H. J., Heezius, E. C. J. M., Dallinga, G. M., van Strijp, J. A. G., Verhoef, J., & van Kessel, K. P. 
M. (2003). Lipoprotein metabolism in patients with severe sepsis. Critical Care Medicine, 31(5), 1359–
1366. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000059724.08290.51 
Vincent, J.-L. (2004). Endpoints in sepsis trials: more than just 28-day mortality? Critical Care Medicine, 32(5 
Suppl), S209–S213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000126124.41743.86 
Walley, K. R., Thain, K. R., Russell, J. A., Reilly, M. P., Meyer, N. J., Ferguson, J. F., … Boyd, J. H. (2014). 
PCSK9 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and septic shock outcome. Science 
Translational Medicine, 6(258), 258ra143. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008782 
Wang, H. E., Jones, A. R., & Donnelly, J. P. (2017). Revised National Estimates of Emergency Department 
Visits for Sepsis in the United States*. Critical Care Medicine, 45(9), 1443–1449. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002538