Vitamin D as a Therapeutic Adjunct in the Stimulant Treatment of ADHD: a Proof-of-concept Study of Stimulant-induced Dopamine Release Using [11C]-PHNO PET in Healthy Humans
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: ADHD
Sponsor: Yale University

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03103750 
Oﬃcial Title: Vitamin D as a TherapeuƟc Adjunct in the SƟmulant Treatment of ADHD: a Proof-of-concept 
Study of SƟmulant-induced Dopamine Release Using [11C]-PHNO PET in Healthy Humans 
Document Type: Protocol w SAP 
Date: 11/1/2023 

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 1 of 59
YALE UNIVERSITY
                                  HUMAN INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE
                                     Application to Involve Human Subjects in Biomedical Research
100 FR1 (2016-1) 
SECTION I: ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Title of Research Project: Vitamin D as a therapeutic adjunct in the stimulant treatment of ADHD: a proof-
of-concept study of stimulant-induced dopamine release using [11C]-PHNO PET in healthy humans
Principal Investigator:
Marc Potenza, MD, PhD
Yale Academic Appointment:
Professor
Department: Psychiatry
Campus Address: 
1 Church Street, Room 726.   New Haven, CT 06510 
Campus Phone: 
203-737-3553
Fax: 
203-737-3591
Pager: 
E-mail: 
marc.potenza@yale.edu
Protocol Correspondent Name & Address (if different than PI): Jessica Costeines, MSW
Campus Phone: 
203-974-7559
Fax:
203-974-7662 
E-mail: 
jessica.costeines@yale.edu
Yale Cancer Center CTO Protocol Correspondent Name & Address (if applicable):
Campus Phone: 
Fax: 
E-mail: 
Business Manager:
Campus Phone :
Fax :
E-mail
Investigator Interests:
Does the principal investigator, or do any research personnel who are responsible for the design, 
conduct or reporting of this project or any of their family members (spouse or dependent child) 
have an incentive or interest, financial or otherwise, that may affect the protection of the human 
subjects involved in this project, the scientific objectivity of the research or its integrity? Note: 
The Principal Investigator (Project Director), upon consideration of the individual’s role and 
degree of independence in carrying out the work, will determine who is responsible for the 
design, conduct, or reporting of the research. 
Faculty Advisor:(required if PI is a student, 
resident, fellow or other trainee)          X NA
Yale Academic Appointment:
Campus Address: 
Campus Phone: 
Fax: 
Pager: 
E-mail: 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

A P P R O V E D B Y T H E Y A L E U NI V E R SI T Y I R B 1 1/ 1/ 2 0 2 3
Pa ge 2  of 5 9
See Discl os ures a n d Ma na ge me nt of Pers o nal I nterests i n H u ma n Researc h 
htt p:// w w w. yale.e d u/ hr p p/ p olicies/i n de x. ht ml # C OI  
  Yes 
   N o
D o y o u or d oes a n y o ne o n t he researc h tea m w h o is deter mi ne d b y y o u t o be res p o nsi ble f or t he 
desi g n, c o n d uct or re p orti n g of t his researc h ha ve a n y pate nt (s ole ri g ht t o ma ke, use or sell a n 
i n ve nti o n) or c o p yri g ht (e xcl usi ve ri g hts t o a n ori gi nal w or k) i nterests relate d t o t his researc h 
pr ot oc ol?
  Yes 
   N o
If yes t o eit her q uesti o n a b o ve, list na mes of t he i n vesti gat or or res p o nsi ble pers o n:
T he Y ale U niversity Pri nci p al I nvesti g at or, all Y ale U niversity c o-i nvesti g at ors, a n d all Y ale 
U niversity i n divi d u als w h o are res p o nsi ble f or t he desi g n, c o n d uct or re p orti n g of rese arc h m ust 
h ave a c urre nt fi n a nci al discl os ure f or m o n file wit h t he U niversity’s C o nflict of I nterest Office. 
Y ale Ne w H ave n H os pit al pers o n nel w h o are liste d as c o-i nvesti g at ors o n a pr ot oc ol wit h a Y ale 
U niversity Pri nci p al I nvesti g at or m ust als o h ave a c urre nt fi n a nci al discl os ure f or m o n file wit h 
t he U niversity’s C o nflict of I nterest Office. If t his has n ot bee n d o ne, t he i n di vi d ual(s) s h o ul d 
f oll o w t his li n k t o t he C OI Office We bsite t o c o m plete t he f or m:  htt p:// w w w. yale.e d u/c oi/   
N O T E: T he re q uire me nt f or mai ntai ni n g a c urre nt discl os ure f or m o n file wit h t he U ni versit y’s 
C o nflict of I nterest Office e xte n ds pri maril y t o Yale U ni versit y a n d Yale- Ne w Ha ve n H os pital 
pers o n nel.  W het her or n ot t he y are re q uire d t o m ai nt ai n a discl os ure f or m wit h t he 
U ni versit y’s C o nflict of I nterest Office, all i n vesti g at ors a n d i n di vi d u als dee me d ot her wise 
res p o nsi ble b y t he PI w h o are liste d o n t he pr ot oc ol are re q uire d t o discl ose t o t he PI a n y 
i nterests t h at are s pecific t o t his pr ot oc ol.
S E C TI O N II: G E N E R A L IN F O R M A TI O N
1.
Perf or mi n g Or g a niz ati o ns:  I de ntif y t he h os pital, i n- patie nt or o ut patie nt facilit y, sc h o ol or 
ot her a ge nc y t hat will ser ve as t he l ocati o n of t he researc h.  C h o ose all t hat a p pl y:
 
a. I nter n al L oc ati o n[s] of t he St u d y:
  Ma g netic Res o na nce Researc h Ce nter 
  Yale U ni versit y P E T Ce nter
     ( M R- T A C)   
 Y C CI/ C h urc h Street Researc h U nit ( C S R U)
 Yale Ca ncer Ce nter/ Cli nical Trials Office ( C T O)     
 Y C CI/ H os pital Researc h U nit ( H R U)
 Yale Ca ncer Ce nter/ S mil o w
 Y C CI/ Kec k La b orat ories
 Yale- Ne w Ha ve n H os pital
 Yale- Ne w Ha ve n H os pital — Sai nt Ra p hael Ca m p us
 Ca ncer Data Re p osit or y/ T u m or Re gistr y
 S pecif y Ot her Yale L ocati o n:
b. E xter n al L oc ati o n[s]:
 A P T F o u n dati o n, I nc.
 Has ki ns La b orat ories
A P P R O V E D B Y T H E Y A L E U NI V E R SI T Y I R B 1 1/ 1/ 2 0 2 3

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 3 of 59
 Connecticut Mental Health Center
 John B. Pierce Laboratory, Inc.
  Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit (CNRU) 
Veterans Affairs Hospital, West Haven
 Other Locations, Specify: 
 International Research Site 
(Specify location(s)):
c. Additional Required Documents (check all that apply):
 N/A
*YCCI-Scientific and Safety Committee (YCCI-SSC)
Approval Date: 
*Pediatric Protocol Review Committee (PPRC)
Approval Date: 
*YCC Protocol Review Committee (YRC-PRC)
Approval Date:
*Dept. of Veterans Affairs, West Haven VA HSS
Approval Date: 
  *Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC)
Approval Date: 
  YNHH-Radiation Safety Committee (YNHH-RSC)
Approval Date:                                                            
   Yale University RSC (YU-RSC)
Approval Date:
  Magnetic Resonance Research Center PRC (MRRC-PRC)
Approval Date:
 *Nursing Research Committee
Approval Date:
 YSM/YNHH Cancer Data Repository (CaDR)
Approval Date: 
 Dept. of Lab Medicine request for services or specimens form
 Imaging on YNHH Diagnostic Radiology equipment request form (YDRCTO request) found 
at  http://radiology.yale.edu/research/ClinTrials.aspx)
*Approval from these committees is required before final HIC approval is granted. See instructions 
for documents required for initial submission and approval of the protocol. Allow sufficient time for 
these requests. Check with the oversight body for their time requirements.
2. Probable Duration of Project: State the expected duration of the project, including all 
follow-up and data analysis activities. 
6 years
3. Research Type/Phase: (Check all that apply)
a. Study Type
   
  Single Center Study
   
 Multi-Center Study
Does the Yale PI serve as the PI of the multi-site study? Yes 
No X
  
 Coordinating Center/Data Management
  
 Other: 
b. Study Phase
 N/A
    
  Pilot
 Phase I
 Phase II
 Phase III
 Phase IV
    
 Other (Specify) 
4. Area of Research: (Check all that apply) Note that these are overlapping definitions and 
more than one category may apply to your research protocol. Definitions for the following 
can be found  in the instructions section 4c:
 Clinical Research: Patient-Oriented
  
 Clinical Research: Outcomes and 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 4 of 59
 Clinical Research: Epidemiologic and Behavioral 
                Health Services
  Translational Research #1 (“Bench-to-Bedside”)    
 Interdisciplinary Research
 Translational Research #2 (“Bedside-to-Community”) 
 Community-Based Research
5.   Is this study a clinical trial? Yes 
No 
NOTE the current ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) definition of a 
clinical trial: “any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans 
to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes.” Health-related 
interventions include any intervention used to modify a biomedical or health-related outcome (for 
example, drugs, surgical procedures, devices, behavioral treatments, dietary interventions, and 
process-of-care changes). Health outcomes include any biomedical or health-related measures 
obtained in patients or participants, including pharmacokinetic measures and adverse events”
If yes, where is it registered?
Clinical Trials.gov registry 
Other (Specify) 
Registration of clinical trials at their initiation is required by the FDA, NIH and by the ICMJE.
If this study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov, there is new language in the consent form and compound 
authorization that should be used.
For more information on registering clinical trials, including whether your trial must be 
registered, see the YCCI webpage, http://ycci.yale.edu/researchers/ors/registerstudy.aspx 
or  contact YCCI at 203.785.3482)
6. Does the Clinical Trials Agreement (CTA) require compliance with ICH GCP (E6)? 
Yes 
  No
7. Will this study have a billable service? A billable service is defined as any service rendered to 
a study subject that, if he/she was not on a study, would normally generate a bill from either 
Yale-New Haven Hospital or Yale Medical Group to the patient or the patient’s insurer. The 
service may or may not be performed by the research staff on your study, but may be provided by 
professionals within either Yale-New Haven Hospital or Yale Medical Group (examples include 
x-rays, MRIs, CT scans, specimens sent to central labs, or specimens sent to pathology). Notes: 
1. There is no distinction made whether the service is paid for by the subject or their insurance 
(Standard of Care) or by the study’s funding mechanism (Research Sponsored). 2. This generally 
includes new services or orders placed in EPIC for research subjects. 
Yes
 No 
 If answered, “yes”, this study will need to be set up in OnCore, Yale’s clinical research 
management system, for Epic to appropriately route research related charges. Please contact 
oncore.support@yale.edu
8.. Are there any procedures involved in this protocol that will be performed at YNHH or one of 
its affiliated entities?  Yes ___ No __X_  If Yes, please answer questions a through c and note 
instructions below.  If No, proceed to Section III.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 5 of 59
a. Does your YNHH privilege delineation currently include the specific procedure that you will 
perform?
b. Will you be using any new equipment or equipment that you have not used in the past for 
this procedure?
 
c. Will a novel approach using existing equipment be applied?
 
If you answered “no” to question 8a, or "yes" to question 8b or c, please contact the YNHH 
Department of Physician Services (688-2615) for prior approval before commencing with your 
research protocol.
Please note that if this protocol includes Yale-New Haven Hospital patients, including patients at 
the HRU, the Principal Investigator and any co-investigators who are physicians or  mid-level 
practitioners (includes PAs, APRNs, psychologists and speech pathologists) who may have direct 
patient contact with patients on YNHH premises must have medical staff appointment and 
appropriate clinical privileges at YNHH. If you are uncertain whether the study personnel meet 
the criteria, please telephone the Physician Services Department at 203-688-2615. By signing 
this protocol as a PI, you attest that you and any co-investigator who may have patient contact 
has a medical staff appointment and appropriate clinical privileges at YNHH.
SECTION III: FUNDING, RESEARCH TEAM AND TRAINING
1. Funding Source: Indicate all of the funding source(s) for this study. Check all boxes that apply.
Provide information regarding the external funding source.  This information should include 
identification of the agency/sponsor, the funding mechanism (grant or contract), and whether 
the award is pending or has been awarded. Provide the M/C# and Agency name (if grant-
funded).  If the funding source associated with a protocol is “pending” at the time of the 
protocol submission to the HIC (as is the case for most NIH submissions), the PI should note 
“Pending” in the appropriate section of the protocol application, provide the M/C# and 
Agency name (if grant-funded) and further note that University (departmental) funds support 
the research (until such time that an award is made).  
This information can be found in IRES IRB. 
IRB Review fees are charged for projects funded by Industry or Other For-Profit Sponsors.  
Provide the Name and Address of the Sponsor Representative to whom the invoice should be 
sent.  Note: the PI’s home department will be billed if this information is not provided.
Send IRB Review Fee Invoice To:
Name:
Company:
Address:
2. Research Team:  List all members of the research team. Indicate under the affiliation column whether 
the investigators or study personnel are part of the Yale faculty or staff, or part of the faculty or staff 
from a collaborating institution, or are not formally affiliated with any institution. ALL members of 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 6 of 59
the research team MUST complete Human Subject Protection Training (HSPT) and Health 
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Training before they may be listed on the 
protocol.  See NOTE below.
NOTE: The HIC will remove from the protocol any personnel who have not completed required training. 
A personnel protocol amendment will need to be submitted when training is completed.
Please see IRES IRB for a complete list of study personnel.
SECTION IV:
 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/FACULTY ADVISOR/ DEPARTMENT CHAIR AGREEMENT
As the principal investigator of this research project, I certify that:

The information provided in this application is complete and accurate.

I assume full responsibility for the protection of human subjects and the proper conduct of the
      research.

Subject safety will be of paramount concern, and every effort will be made to protect subjects’
      rights and welfare.

The research will be performed according to ethical principles and in compliance with all federal,
      state and local laws, as well as institutional regulations and policies regarding the protection of  
      human subjects.

All members of the research team will be kept apprised of research goals.

I will obtain approval for this research study and any subsequent revisions prior to my initiating the
      study or any change and I will obtain continuing approval of this study prior to the expiration date     
      of any approval period.

I will report to the HIC any serious injuries and/or other unanticipated problems involving risk to
      participants.

I am in compliance with the requirements set by the University and qualify to serve as the
      principal investigator of this project or have acquired the appropriate approval from the 
      Dean’s Office or Office of the Provost, or the Human Subject Protection Administrator at
      Yale-New Haven Hospital, or have a faculty advisor.

I will identify a qualified successor should I cease my role as principal investigator and facilitate a
smooth transfer of investigator responsibilities.
_____
 
PI Name (PRINT) and Signature
Date
As the faculty advisor of this research project, I certify that:

The information provided in this application is complete and accurate.

This project has scientific value and merit and that the student or trainee investigator has the necessary 
resources to complete the project and achieve the aims.

I will train the student investigator in matters of appropriate research compliance, protection of human 
subjects and proper conduct of research.

The research will be performed according to ethical principles and in compliance with all federal, state 
and local laws, as well as institutional regulations and policies regarding the protection of human subjects.

The student investigator will obtain approval for this research study and any subsequent revisions prior to 
initiating the study or revision and will obtain continuing approval prior to the expiration of any approval 
period.

The student investigator will report to the HIC any serious injuries and/or other unanticipated       
problems involving risk to participants. 

I am in compliance with the requirements set forth by the University and qualify to serve as       the faculty 
advisor of this project. 

I assume all of the roles and responsibilities of a Principal Investigator even though the student may be 
called a PI.
___________
______
_____
Advisor Name (PRINT) and Signature
Date
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 7 of 59
Department Chair’s Assurance Statement
Do you know of any real or apparent institutional conflict of interest (e.g., Yale ownership of a
sponsoring company, patents, licensure) associated with this research project?
 Yes (provide a description of that interest in a separate letter addressed to the HIC.)
 No
As Chair, do you have any real or apparent protocol-specific conflict of interest between yourself and
the sponsor of the research project, or its competitor or any interest in any intervention and/or method
tested in the project that might compromise this research project?
Yes (provide a description of that interest in a separate letter addressed to the HIC)
No
I assure the HIC that the principal investigator and all members of the research team are qualified by
education, training, licensure and/or experience to assume participation in the conduct of this research
trial. I also assure that the principal investigator has departmental support and sufficient resources to
conduct this trial appropriately.
   ____________________________
   Chair Name (PRINT) and Signature  
    
 Date
   _________________________________
   Department
YNHH Human Subjects Protection Administrator Assurance Statement
Required when the study is conducted solely at YNHH by YNHH health care providers.
As Human Subject Protection Administrator (HSPA) for YNHH, I certify that:

I have read a copy of the protocol and approve it being conducted at YNHH.

I agree to notify the IRB if I am aware of any real or apparent institutional conflict of interest.

The principal investigator of this study is qualified to serve as P.I. and has the support of the hospital 
for this research project.
  ______________________________________
    YNHH HSPA Name (PRINT) and Signature       
Date
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 8 of 59
SECTION V: RESEARCH PLAN
1. Statement of Purpose: State the scientific aim(s) of the study, or the hypotheses to be tested. 
Specific Aim 1: As part of a within-subject, two-days, study design, to determine whether 
acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated with greater amphetamine (Amp)-
induced dopamine (DA) release in the caudate, putamen, ventral striatum (VST), and 
substantia nigra / ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) of healthy human subjects. Hypothesis: 
Given prior evidence of increased amphetamine-evoked DA release in rats pretreated with 
calcitriol compared to placebo (Cass, Peters et al. 2012), we hypothesize that pre-treatment 
with calcitriol will produce greater Amp-induced DA release relative to placebo, resulting in 
lower post-Amp, [11C]-PHNO BPND values on calcitriol as compared to placebo days. If 
confirmed, such data would provide compelling preliminary support for the adjunctive use of 
calcitriol for enhancing stimulant medication effects (leading to larger scale PET imaging 
and/or clinical trial studies in humans with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or 
ADHD). 
Specific Aim 2: To determine whether acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated 
with better performance on a test of attention (e.g., the continuous Performance Task or CPT–
IP), after treatment with amphetamine. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that healthy human 
subjects pre-treated with calcitriol will have faster reaction times/higher accuracy on the CPT-
IP vs. subjects pre-treated with placebo, after treatment with amphetamine.
Specific Aim 3:  As part of a within-subject, two-days, study design, to determine whether 
acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated with greater amphetamine (Amp)-
induced dopamine (DA) release in the caudate, putamen, ventral striatum (VST), and 
substantia nigra / ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) of subjects with attention deficit 
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Hypothesis: Similar to our hypothesis with healthy controls 
and congruent with our preliminary findings, we hypothesize that pre-treatment with calcitriol 
will produce greater Amp-induced DA release relative to placebo, resulting in lower post-Amp, 
[11C]-PHNO BPND values on calcitriol as compared to placebo days.
Specific Aim 4:  To determine whether acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated 
with better performance on a test of attention (e.g., the continuous Performance Task or CPT–
IP), after treatment with amphetamine. Hypothesis: Similar to our hypothesis with healthy 
controls and congruent with our preliminary findings, we hypothesize that individuals with 
ADHD pre-treated with calcitriol will have faster reaction times/higher accuracy on the CPT-
IP vs. subjects pre-treated with placebo, after treatment with amphetamine
2. Background: Describe the background information that led to the plan for this project. 
Provide references to support the expectation of obtaining useful scientific data.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 9 of 59
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and serious neuropsychiatric 
disorder in children. With a prevalence of ~ 5 % in school-age children, ADHD is responsible 
for a disproportionate (i.e., 30 - 50 %) of referrals to mental health services (MTA 1999, 
Wilens, Adler et al. 2008). ADHD has considerable consequences, making it one of the largest 
public health problems in the US (Biederman, Faraone et al. 1993, Biederman, Petty et al. 
2008, Klein, Mannuzza et al. 2012).  For example, work difficulties, educational/occupational 
under-attainment (Biederman, Petty et al. 2008), short-lived relationships/risky sexual 
behaviors (Biederman, Petty et al. 2008) (Biederman, Faraone et al. 1993, Kooij, Bejerot et al. 
2010), criminality (Biederman, Petty et al. 2008), automobile collisions (Barkley, Murphy et 
al. 2002), and higher rates of lifetime mood lability (Biederman, Petty et al. 2008) are all 
associated with the disorder. 
Although the neurobiological basis of ADHD is unknown, it has been postulated that there is 
a dysfunction in catecholamines (e.g., norepinephrine and dopamine [DA]) resulting in 
dysregulation of fronto – cortical and striatal structures.  For instance, DA has been associated 
with attention, salience (Volkow, Wang et al. 2004), focus, vigilance, and on-task behavior 
(Wilens and Dodson 2004). Stimulants block the presynaptic reuptake of DA (e.g., 
methylphenidate [Mph] and amphetamines [Amp]) and enhance its presynaptic release (e.g., 
Amp), making them some of the most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of 
adult ADHD (Wilens, Faraone et al. 2004) (Solanto 1998, Volkow, Wang et al. 1998). For 
instance, a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) study showed how Mph’s effects on 
extracellular DA in the striatum is associated with higher interest/motivation in a mathematical 
task (Volkow, Wang et al. 2004). Notwithstanding the fact that stimulants are the most 
commonly prescribed medications for the disorder (Solanto 1998, Wilens and Dodson 2004, 
Wilens, Faraone et al. 2004) and the increasing evidence documenting their safety in the 
treatment of ADHD, parents nonetheless face significant uncertainty, fear and resistance when 
it comes starting such medications in their child (Brinkman, Sherman et al. 2009). For example, 
many children develop side effects unrelated to the therapeutic effects of the drugs, 
necessitating discontinuation, and still others will fail to respond adequately. In addition, there 
have been increasing concerns about diversion of stimulants, with lifetime rates as high as 16 
to 29 % (Wilens, Adler et al. 2008).
As a result, there is a considerable interest in / need for strategies aimed at minimizing 
stimulant exposure / enhancing stimulant benefit in ADHD children. 
The Vitamin D precursor, 7-dehydrocholesterol, is a cholesterol derivative located in the skin.  
Exposure to ultraviolet light and spontaneous isomerization convert it to cholecalciferol 
(Holick 1995). Then, two hydroxylation steps first in the liver and then in the kidney make 1, 
25 (OH)2D (dihyrdoxycholecalciferol or calcitriol) – i.e. the active form of vitamin D (Holick 
2007).  The rate limiting enzyme in this activation process, 1 hydroxylase, was primarily 
found to be in kidney tubules (Zehnder and Hewison 1999), but  we now know that this enzyme 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 10 of 59
is expressed in many different cells, including neurons (Stumpf, Sar et al. 1979, Bouillon, 
Carmeliet et al. 2008, Buell and Dawson-Hughes 2008). The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is 
present in DA neurons (Cui, Pelekanos et al. 2013) and our colleagues/collaborators (DiLeone 
et al.) have confirmed its cellular co-localization with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (Fig 1A), the 
rate-limiting enzyme in DA synthesis. Intriguingly, and consistent with subchronic dosing 
studies (Cass, Peters et al. 2012), they have shown that a single dose of calcitriol vs. vehicle 
resulted in significantly enhanced Amp-induced DA release as measured by both in vivo 
microdialysis (Fig 1B) and Fast Scan Cyclic Voltammetry (FSCV). Moreover, this same 
calcitriol dose resulted in reductions in Amp consumption (e.g., number of licks) in rodents 
(Figure 1C; left) without affecting total intake of fluid (Figure 1C; right). Taken together, these 
data demonstrate that the biologically active form of Vitamin D (i.e., calcitriol) enhances 
stimulant-induced DA release and produces changes in behavior consistent with enhanced 
stimulant effects in rodents. 
A Causal and/or Contributory Role for Vitamin D in ADHD: the jury is out. Increases in 
the rates of childhood ADHD over the past two decades have lead to speculation that 
calcitriol deficiency (e.g., secondary to the increased use of sunscreen and/or increases in 
sedentary, indoor lifestyles in children) plays a causal/contributory role in the etiology of 
ADHD (Arns, van der Heijden et al. 2013). To date, evidence of a direct link is lacking. One 
study showed higher maternal circulating Vitamin D levels in pregnancy are associated with 
lower risk of developing ADHD-like symptoms in childhood (Morales, Julvez et al. 2015).  
On the other hand, another study did not replicate the above association (Strom, Halldorsson 
et al. 2014), and a prospective study using umbilical cord samples stored at the time of birth 
reported no difference in serum vitamin D levels between ADHD group versus healthy 
controls (Gustafsson, Rylander et al. 2015).  In terms of clinical trials, one randomized 
double blind study among adults with ADHD reported a beneficial effect of the intervention, 
measured with the Conners Adult ADHR rating scale, in comparison with placebo, but the 
intervention included the combination of vitamin D and several other micronutrients 
(Rucklidge, Frampton et al. 2014).  An analysis of moderators of a positive response to 
ADHD behaviors did not reveal a significant predictive effect of vitamin D (Rucklidge, 
Johnstone et al. 2014). 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 11 of 59
However, recent studies provide intriguing indirect evidence of an inverse relationship 
between solar intensity (SI) and/or altitude (a proxy for greater sun/UV light exposure) and 
regional rates of ADHD. One study examined three large datasets across 49 U.S. states for 
2003 and 2007, and across 9 non-U.S. countries. This study examined the prevalence of 
ADHD and Solar Intensity (SI) maps.  They found an inverse association between solar 
intensity and prevalence of ADHD (Arns, van der Heijden et al. 2013). Another study 
examined two national survey datasets.  They found an inverse relationship between altitude 
and prevalence of ADHD (Huber, Kim et al. 2015). We hypothesize, as suggested by Huber, 
that a common denominator on the above studies is the increased vitamin D levels in those 
exposed to a higher solar intensity, which is known to increase with altitude (Arns, Swanson 
et al. 2015).  
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can be used to measure stimulant-induced DA release 
in humans. PET is a non-invasive, brain imaging technique in which radioactively labeled 
medications are used measure drug targets (e.g., receptors) and related neurochemistry in vivo. 
For example, work over the past two decades 
has employed the antagonist radioligand, 
[11C]-raclopride, to not only measure D2/3 
receptors in the brain, but also the release of 
its endogenous neurotransmitter (i.e., DA) 
following stimulant medication administration 
(i.e., by comparing the relative displacement 
of radiotracer in comparison to placebo) 
(Cardenas, Houle et al. 2004). In fact, such 
methods have been employed previously to 
measure DA release in adults with ADHD 
(Volkow, Wang et al. 2007) (i.e., which was positively associated with improvement in ADHD 
symptoms, such as inattention) (Volkow, Wang et al. 2007).  Our group has considerable 
experience conducting such experiments with dextro-ampethamine (at doses in excess of those 
employed here; e.g., 0.4 mg/kg vs. 0.3 mg/kg).  At the Yale PET center, we have characterized 
and applied an improved agonist radiotracer for the D2/3 receptor, [11C]-PHNO, demonstrating 
its excellent test-retest variability in striatum (Gallezot, Zheng et al. 2014) and its greater 
sensitivity to Amp-induced DA release relative to traditional antagonist ligands (i.e., [11C]-
raclopride) (Shotbolt, Tziortzi et al. 2012). As such, [11C]-PHNO constitutes an optimal tracer 
for our proposed studies evaluating the effects of calcitriol on stimulant-induced DA release in 
humans. We have experience conducting these experiments with [11C]-raclopride as well as 
with agonist ligands, such as [11C]-PHNO, in humans (Fig 2). 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 12 of 59
Clinical evidence of calcitriol’s capacity to enhance stimulant-induced DA release in 
healthy humans as measured by 11C-PHNO PET:  We have obtained 11C-PHNO PET data in 
two healthy males (28 ± 1 yrs) who successfully completed two sets of paired, same-day, pre- 
(baseline) and post-AMPH scans of subcortical D2/3 receptor availability (BPND) on both active 
calcitriol (3.0 µg) and placebo pretreatment days one week apart (N=4 scans/subject)(Fig 2A 
left; see next page).  In contrast to preclinical (rodent mRNA) findings, no effects of calcitriol 
on baseline measures of D2/3 receptor availability vs. placebo were observed (mean ± SD BPND = 
4.5 ± 0.8 vs. 4.3 ± 0.3, respectively; Fig 2A center).  However, as hypothesized, calcitriol 
produced robust increases in AMPH-stimulated DA release as measured by % change in pre- vs. 
post-AMPH BPND vs. placebo (∆BPND = 25 ± 3% vs. 15 ± 2%; Fig 2A right). Calcitriol findings 
in VS extended to other subcortical regions as well (caudate, putamen, and pallidum). 
Importantly, calcitriol also enhanced vigilance/attention after AMPH as measured by the 
Continuous Performance Task-AX (Fig 2B). Thus, PET measures of DA release and 
neurocognitive tests of vigilance/attention provide strong support for calcitriol’s potential 
efficacy in humans.  
3. Research Plan: Summarize the study design and research procedures using non-technical 
language that can be readily understood by someone outside the discipline. Be sure to 
distinguish between standard of care vs. research procedures when applicable, and 
include any flowcharts of visits specifying their individual times and lengths. Describe 
the setting in which the research will take place.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 13 of 59
A total of 30 healthy subjects will be studied as outpatients as part of Specific Aims 1 & 2. All 
subjects will participate in total of four high-resolution PET scans using  [11C]-PHNO as the tracer 
(both baseline and post-Amp scans on both calcitriol and placebo pretreatment days). This is a 
within-subject, two-day four-scan, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design.  In 
Aims 3 & 4, a total of 30 ADHD subjects will be studied as either inpatients or outpatients. They 
will complete same number of scans as healthy controls following same design.
In-Person Screening: Subjects who pass the telephone screening for this study will be invited to 
the CNRU for an in-person screening appointment, which will last approximately 2 hours. The 
purpose of this evaluation is to ensure that subjects meet study criteria (as listed below in section 
for inclusion/exclusion criteria).  Subjects will be consented for the study, before the remaining 
screening procedures begin. The screening procedures include: a physical exam by a study 
physician, complete blood count (CBC) with differential, chemistry profile (including serum 
calcium and phosphate levels), thyroid function studies, LFTs, BUN, creatinine, serum 25(OH) 
vitamin D level, levels of parathyroid hormone, urine toxicology screening, urinalysis, cardiac 
screening questionnaire, and electrocardiogram (ECG). The amount of blood drawn during the 
screening visit is less than 60 milliliters (ml). All female subjects will undergo urine or serum 
pregnancy tests at the time of screening which must be negative in order to be considered for 
participation in the study.  The total volume of blood collected throughout the duration of this 
study will be no more than 16 ounces which is well within the Red Cross blood donation standards 
and are safe for study participants.  Subjects will also complete a structured clinical interview 
(SCID) (First 1995), a Magnetic Resonance Safety Screening Questionnaire, and a release of 
information so that study staff can contact the subject’s primary care physician or can review 
medical records, if available and if considered necessary by the study physician. Once subjects are 
considered eligible, research pharmacy will randomly assign their first experimental day to 
calcitriol or placebo.  The in-person screening visit will last approximately 2 hours. In-person 
screening will be the same for ADHD subjects with the addition of  the Adult ADHD Self-Report 
Screening Scale for DSM-5 [6] as well as the ADHD component of the Structured Clinical 
Interview for DSM-5 (SCID) (First et al., 1995).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (3 T) will be 
collected in each subject for the purposes of excluding participants with anatomical abnormalities 
and anatomically co-registering PET and MRI for image analysis. A member of the research team 
will accompany each subject to the MRI Center and remain with the subject for the duration of the 
scan session. The acquisition sequence is a 3D MPRAGE MR pulse sequence with TE = 3.3 ms, 
flip angle = 7 degrees; slice thickness = 1.0 mm, 0.98 mm pixels. Personnel will escort the subject 
to the MRI Center.  All female subjects will undergo a urine or serum pregnancy test before the 
MRI. The MRI scan will be completed on a separate day after the screening visit and before the 
experiment days (e.g., PET scans), and will last approximately 1 hour.  Once subjects complete 
MRI, research staff will give them 3 capsules of the study medication (e.g., each capsule will have 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 14 of 59
calcitriol 0.5 mcg or placebo).  Subjects will receive instructions to keep these tablets until the 
night before the first experiment day and will also receive a sheet with instructions in order to 
prepare them for the first experiment day. 
Night before the first experiment day: At 9 pm, the Principal Investigator (or other research staff 
member) will have a video (e.g., Skype or Facetime) conference call with subjects.  The purpose 
of this conference call is to observe and confirm that subjects take the study medication.  As part 
of this call: 1) research staff member will assess compliance with instructions to minimize risks 
from calcitriol (e.g., verify that subject had adhered to a diet low on calcium content that day and 
that they had drank 3-4 cups of water or electrolyte containing fluids above their usual fluid intake); 
2) subjects will display the capsules; and 3) subjects will take the three capsules with one full glass 
of water.  If participants are inpatient on the unit, medications will be administered at 9 pm by 
clinical nursing staff.
Test days: Each subject will be scheduled for two different visits at the Yale PET Center, separated 
by at least six days (based on the duration of calcitriol’s pharmacological activity of 3-5 days) 
(Table 1). Each test day will start approximately at 8:00 am with verification that subjects were 
fasting (e.g., “NPO”) since 11:59 pm the night before, followed by measurement of vital signs, an 
electrocardiogram, rapid dipstick urinary pregnancy test, and a blood draw of 10 milliliters (ml) to 
measure serum 1-25 (OH)2 D3  and calcium levels. Afterwards subjects will have oral 
administration of the study medication (e.g., three 0.5 mcg capsules of calcitriol vs. placebo). 
Thirty-five minutes after administration of the study medication, subjects will complete two 
different brief self-ratings: The Drug Effects Questionnaires and the Simplified Version of the 
Amphetamine Interview Rating Scale (Van Kammen and Murphy 1975, Morean, de Wit et al. 
2013).  Before the baseline scan, subjects will complete the eye blink rate and the Probabilistic 
Reversal Learning Task (PRLT).
Preparation of the subject for PET scanning will include the placement of a venous line. The 
purpose of the venous line is for the [11C]-PHNO injection; the venous line may also be used for 
blood sampling. Approximately two hours (i.e., 120 minutes) after calcitriol administration, 
subjects will have IV administration of a dose of up to 10 mCi of [11C]-PHNO. Then each subject 
will undergo a 120-minute dynamic (i.e., emission and transmission) scan on a high-resolution 
research tomography (HRRT). Ninety minutes after starting the [11C]-PHNO PET scan, subjects 
will have blood drawn for measurement of calcitriol levels.  Upon completion of the [11C]-PHNO 
PET scan, subjects will complete a 20-minute, computer-based task of attention, the CPT-IP (i.e. 
continuous performance task). Approximately 4.5 hours after receiving the study medication, 
subjects will receive an oral dose of dextro-amphetamine (Dexedrine 0.3 mg/kg, to a maximum 
dose of 30 mg).  Subjects will have blood drawn for the measurement of amphetamine levels at 60 
and 120 minutes after receiving dextro-amphetamine. Before the second scan, subjects will 
complete the eye blink rate. Approximately two and a half hours after receiving dextro-
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 15 of 59
amphetamine, subjects will have a second IV administration of up to 10 mCi of [11C]-PHNO, 
followed by another 120-minute dynamic (i.e., emission and transmission) imaging session scan 
on a HRRT. Ninety minutes after starting the second [11C]-PHNO scan, subjects will have blood 
drawn for the measurement of calcitriol, calcium (Ca), and Phosphorus (P) levels. Upon 
completion of the second [11C]-PHNO scan, subjects will complete the 20-minute CPT-IP a second 
time.  A summary of procedures described above is provided in Table 1. End of the test day will 
be after subject has tolerated lunch and has been cleared by the study physician for discharge.  The 
amount of blood drawn during each experiment day is less than 70 ml.
If participating as an outpatient, ADHD subjects study will follow the exact same study design and 
follow all of the same study procedures as healthy controls, but will take their prescribed stimulant 
medication, at their normal prescribed dose, in place of the dextro-amphetamine. These subjects 
will not be asked to discontinue their medication leading up to or throughout the study procedures. 
If participating as an inpatient, ADHD subjects will follow the same MRI procedures, study 
procedures night before each experiment day, and test day procedures, with the main variation 
being that they will be admitted to the CNRU while they complete those. The CNRU is an 
inpatient, research dedicated, research unit, staffed 24 X 7 with medical and nursing staff, where 
visitors are screening/restricted.  Upon admission to CNRU, subjects will conduct admission 
procedures including medical and psychiatric examination, blood work for CBC with differential, 
comprehensive metabolic panel with TSH and serum pregnancy test, urinalysis, ECG, and urine 
toxicology. The total length of stay on the CNRU will be up to 3 weeks depending on days needed 
to complete 5 half lives off stimulant medications and depending on slots for PET imaging scan 
which will be schedule at least 6 days apart from each other.  The first days on the CNRU are 
meant to acclimatized to the inpatient environment.  Congruent with inpatient study procedures: 
they will not need to receive study medication to take home after MRI; they don’t need to have 
administration of study medication monitored by Skype/Facetime; compliance with dietary 
measurments before test days is supervised by staff from CNRU; and they will be returning from 
the PET Imaging Center back to the CNRU after completion of each test day.
Follow up:  The day after completion of each test day, subjects will be asked to return to the 
CNRU for a blood draw in order to measure calcium levels.  The amount of blood drawn will be 
less than 5 ml. The purpose of this procedure is to monitor the development of hypercalcemia as 
an adverse event. In addition, a study physician will interview subjects in order to assess any 
potential residual side effects relative to their pre-scan baseline. At the end of the first follow up 
visit, subjects will receive 3 capsules of the study medication (i.e., each capsule will have calcitriol 
0.5 mcg or placebo) as well as another instruction sheet for the second experimental day.  The 
second experimental day is the same as the first one. 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 16 of 59
ADHD outpatient subjects will complete the same follow up. Inpatient subjects, because they are 
residing on the CNRU during those days, don’t need to receive either the study medication or 
instructions for the next experiment day, as part of their follow up.  
Dosing: We will use a threshold Dexedrine dose of 0.3 mg/kg (as oppose to 0.4 mg/kg or 0.5 
mg/kg in order to minimize the potential for ceiling effects on DA release/[11C]-PHNO  
displacement, thereby maximizing the chances of detecting calcitriol related augmentation of 
stimulant-induced DA release. 
The choice of calcitriol dose (3 mcg) is based on previous studies in both rodents and humans 
(Broadus, Erickson et al. 1984, Erickson, Cooper et al. 1984, Bianchi, Ardissino et al. 1999, 
Brandi, Egfjord et al. 2002, Beer, Eilers et al. 2003, Beer, Ryan et al. 2007, Cass, Peters et al. 
2012). Such studies have employed higher doses than physiologic ones (i.e., those employed in 
the treatment of vitamin D deficiency) and have demonstrated the safety of oral doses as high as 
0.5 mcg/kg (among persons with malignancies) (Beer, Lemmon et al. 2003) or oral/IV doses as 
high as 4 mcg (among healthy controls) (Brandi, Egfjord et al. 2002).  Studies in healthy controls 
(N=11) using a protocol of 3 mcg of daily oral calcitriol for 10 consecutive days (Broadus, 
Erickson et al. 1984) have been shown to be safe and well-tolerated, with a single subject 
developing mild hypercalcemia after six days (this subjects continued in the study at a reduced 
dose of 1.5 mcg per day without complications).  In the current study, the total dose of 3 mcg 
will be divided in two separate administrations of 1.5 mcg for ease of administration (e.g., three 
capsules will be easier than six), to maximize chances that [11C]-PHNO scans are conducted after 
calcitriol has had sufficient time to take effect (e.g., onset of action after 2 hours; maximum 
effect after 10 hours; duration of effect is 3 to 5 days), and to maximize chances of subjects 
tolerating it/minimizing chances of any adverse events.  
Doses of calcitriol and Dexedrine (if applicable) administered to ADHD subjects are the same 
ones as the ones administered to healthy controls. ADHD outpatient subjects will take the 
normal, prescribed dose of their prescription stimulant medication. 
Table 1.  Timeline of Study Procedures ^
Study Procedure
Night 
Before 
Day 1
Day 1
Night
Before
Day 2
Day 2
Time
Relative to
Scan #1
Time
Relative to
Scan #2
Pretreatment Dose 1
(Placebo vs. Calcitriol)
✓
✓
- 18 hr
Baseline Vital Signs
✓
✓
- 130 min
ECG and Blood Draw 
(Calcitriol and Ca2+)
✓
✓
- 125 min
Pretreatment Dose 2
(Placebo vs. Calcitriol)
✓
✓
- 120 min
- 7 hr
Self-Ratings 
(DEQ and AIRS*)
✓
✓
- 90 min
(and Q45 min 
thereafter)
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 17 of 59
*Drug Effects Questionnaire and simplified Amphetamine Interview Rating Scale
**Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task
***Continuous Performance Task – IP
^ Table applies to both healthy controls and ADHD subjects
Vitamin D measurements: In the context of vitamin D deficiency, 1-25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol) 
serum level measurement has insignificant diagnostic value.  Instead 25(OH)D3 level (not the 
active form) is widely measured as a marker of body vitamin D status (Holick 2009). In our 
study we will measure 25(OH)D3 serum levels once, as part of the screening procedures (below 
12 ng/ml will be set as the threshold to diagnose vitamin D deficiency/exclude subjects from the 
study). We will use the IDS-iSYS autoanalyzer from Immunodiagnostic Systems, for the 
measurement of 25(OH)D3. This assay is based on chemiluminescence technology (Boscato and 
Stuart 1988, Sempos, Vesper et al. 2012, Thienpont, Stepman et al. 2012).
Once the screening is completed, our main focus will be 1-25(OH)2D3 measurements on each test 
day since we are pre-treating our subjects with calcitriol. There is conflicting evidence regarding 
the relationship between these two values worldwide (Need, Horowitz et al. 2000, Need, 
O'Loughlin et al. 2008). Serum calcitriol levels will be measured via IDS-iSYS 1,25-Dihydroxy 
Vitamin D kit (Hussein, Ibrahim et al. 2015) three times on each experimental day, once prior to 
calcitriol/placebo administration, and within 90 minutes of each [11C]-PHNO scan. 
Vital Signs 
✓
✓
- 75 min
(Q 15 min thereafter 
until stable after end of 
Scan #2)
Eye blink rate 
✓
✓
-60 min
PRLT**
✓
✓
-45 min
Cardiac Monitoring
(Rate & Rhythm)
✓
✓
- 15 min
(and continuously 
thereafter until stable 
after Scan #2 )
[11C]-PHNO injection & 
PET Scan #1
✓
✓
0
- 5 hr
Blood Draw
(Calcitriol)
✓
✓
+ 90 min
CPT-IP***
✓
✓
+ 120 min
Dexedrine Dose (0.3 
mg/kg PO) or 
Prescription Stimulant
✓
✓
- 150 min
Blood Draw
(Amphetamine)
✓
✓
- 90 min
Blood Draw
(Amphetamine)
✓
✓
- 30 min
Eye blink rate
✓
✓
- 15 min
[11C]-PHNO injection & 
PET Scan #2
✓
✓
0
Blood Draw
(Calcitriol, Ca, and P)
✓
✓
+ 90 min
CPT-IP***
✓
✓
+ 120 min
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 18 of 59
PET imaging: PET scans are acquired as subjects rest on a high-resolution research tomography 
HRRT (207 slices, with a 1.2 mm slice separation and a reconstructed image resolution of ~3 mm). 
This resolution permits visualization of [11C]-PHNO uptake in the caudate, putamen, ventral 
striatum (VST), and substantia nigra / ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA). Partial immobilization of 
the head will be done using Velcro strips and Coban. In addition, on the HRRT scanner, a sensor 
will be attached to the Coban on the subject’s head which will allow for tracking and correction of 
any head movement during the scan. An attenuation correction scan is obtained immediately before 
or after each emission scan. 
The PET scans will be acquired using i.v. bolus administration of 10 mCi dose of high-specific 
activity [11C]-PHNO (maximum mass dose of 0.03 µg/kg) as described by Gallezot and colleagues 
(Gallezot, Beaver et al. 2012).  Each dynamic PET scan will last up to 120 minutes (including 
attenuation correction and emmission scan). Subjects will be asked to void immediately after the 
scan is completed, to reduce radiation exposure to the bladder.   Each experimental day may last 
from 8 am to 5 pm. 
The primary outcome of DA displacement will be post-Amp BPND in comparison to baseline BPND. 
We will conduct baseline scans on both days in order to rule out potential effects of calcitriol on 
D2/3 BPND. 
ADHD subjects will complete same PET imaging study procedures as healthy controls.
Continuous Performance Task (CPT-IP): The Continuous Performance Task is one the most 
widely used tests to quantify attention deficits and attentional changes induced by 
pharmacological agents in both clinical and research settings. It is a modified version of the older 
CPT-AX, giving it higher sensitivity to detect more subtle changes as well as also measuring 
working memory (Rapisarda et al. 2014) (Cornblatt et al. 1988). In this computer based test the 
subjects are shown a random sequence of different numbers and are instructed to press a button 
as quickly and accurately as possible (with their preferred hand) upon detection of two identical 
pairs of numbers, and to withhold their response to any other sequence of letters. In order to 
ensure appropriate completion of the task, subjects will complete the task while video 
conferencing with research team using zoom, allowing virtual sharing of the screen. 
ADHD subjects will also complete CPT-IP.
Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task (PRLT): The computer based PRLT (Swainson, 2000) 
measures subjects’ perseverative responding in the context of changing reward contingencies / 
cues.  
ADHD subjects will also complete PRLT.
Eyeblink Rate:  Preclinical research in non-human primates (Taylor et al. 1999) and clinical 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 19 of 59
studies of humans (e.g., Parkinson’s disease) have shown eyeblink rate to be influenced by 
subcortical DA (with blink rate positively correlated with endogenous DA levels)(98). Thus, we 
will explore the utility of eyeblink as a behavioral proxy (“poor man’s PET scan”) for assessing 
calcitriol-induced changes in basal and/or amphetamine-stimulated DA release. If sensitive to 
calcitriol effects, such methods might provide an efficient and cost-effect technique for future 
investigations. Eyeblink rate will be measured before all PET scans.  In this optional task, 
participants will be asked to stare into a camera and remain still yet act relaxed for a period of five 
minutes.  This will be recorded and saved as a video that is not associated with the name of the 
participant.  A script will be used through Anaconda Python Distribution to identify and code when 
the participant blinks during the recorded period.  This task aims to assess frequency and variability 
of eye blinks between minute long periods to examine a potential relation to impulsive based 
behaviors.
ADHD subjects will also have the option to complete Eyeblink Rate.
Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ): The Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) is used in studies 
of subjective response (SR) to a variety of substances, such as amphetamines.  It assesses the 
extent to which participants feel any substance effect, feel high, like the effects, dislike the 
effects, and want more of the substance.  These five constructs are summarized as FEEL, HIGH, 
DISLIKE, LIKE, and MORE (Hamilton, Strader et al. 2011).
ADHD subjects will also complete DEQ questionnaires. 
Simplified version of the amphetamine interview rating scale: Behavioral response to 
amphetamine will be measured by self-ratings with a simplified version of the Amphetamine 
Interview Rating Scale (Van Kammen and Murphy 1975). Four items will be investigated: 
euphoria ("feel good"), alertness ("feel energetic"), restlessness ("feel like moving") and anxiety 
("feel anxious").
ADHD subjects will also complete simplified version of the amphetamine interview rating scale.
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V (SCID): The SCID is a semi-structured, clinician-
administered interview for making major DSM-V diagnoses (First et al., 1995).  It will be used 
in healthy controls to confirm absence of exclusion criteria.  It will be used in ADHD subjects to 
confirme diagnosis of ADHD as well as to confirm absence of exclusion criteria. 
4. Genetic Testing   N/A  X
A. Describe
i.
the types of future research to be conducted using the materials, specifying if 
immortalization of cell lines, whole exome or genome sequencing, genome wide 
association studies, or animal studies are planned
ii. the plan for the collection of material or the conditions under which material will 
be received
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 20 of 59
iii. the types of information about the donor/individual contributors that will be 
entered into a database
iv. the methods to uphold confidentiality
B. What are the conditions or procedures for sharing of materials and/or distributing for 
future research projects?
C. Is widespread sharing of materials planned?
D. When and under what conditions will materials be stripped of all identifiers?
E. Can donor-subjects withdraw their materials at any time, and/or withdraw the identifiers 
that connect them to their materials?
i.
How will requests to withdraw materials be handled (e.g., material no longer 
identified: that is, anonymized) or material destroyed)?
F. Describe the provisions for protection of participant privacy
G. Describe the methods for the security of storage and sharing of materials 
5. Subject Population: Provide a detailed description of the types of human subjects who will 
be recruited into this study.
We will recruit 30 healthy subjects and 30 ADHD subjects, both males and females between 
the ages of 18-50 years old. These subjects will be medically/psychologically healthy (as 
described below).  ADHD subjects will also be medically/psychologically healthy. Enrolling 
30 healthy subjects and 30 subjects with ADHD in the study will allow us to account for subject 
loss to follow-up and technical issues during data collection that can preclude the interpretation 
of data. 
6. Subject classification: Check off all classifications of subjects that will be specifically 
recruited for enrollment in the research project. Will subjects who may require additional 
safeguards or other considerations be enrolled in the study? If so, identify the population of 
subjects requiring special safeguards and provide a justification for their involvement.
 Children
            
   Healthy 
Fetal material, placenta, or dead fetus
 Non-English Speaking
 Prisoners
 Economically disadvantaged persons
 Decisionally Impaired
 Employees
 Pregnant women and/or fetuses
 Yale Students 
Females of childbearing potential
NOTE: Is this research proposal designed to enroll children who are wards of the state as 
potential subjects? 
 Yes  
  No (If yes, see Instructions section VII #4 for further 
requirements)
7. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: What are the criteria used to determine subject inclusion or    
exclusion?
Inclusion Criteria:
1) Age 18-50 years
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 21 of 59
2) Voluntary, written, informed consent
3) Physically healthy by medical history, physical, neurological, ECG, and laboratory 
examinations
4) For females, non-lactating, with a negative serum or urine pregnancy (-HCG) test
5) Lab results without clinically relevant findings (e.g. renal function, electrolytes, and vitamin D 
levels)
6) English speaking
Exclusion criteria:
1) Medical contraindication to Dexedrine administration (e.g., history of cardiac problems, 
seizures, glaucoma, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, etc.)
2) Medical contraindication to calcitriol administration (e.g., history of hypersensitivity to 
calcitriol or any component of the formulation, hypercalcemia or vitamin D toxicity)
3) History of substance dependence (e.g., alcohol, opiates, sedative hypnotics), except for 
nicotine (ADHD participants could be dependent on stimulants)
4) A primary major DSM-V psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major 
depression, etc.) as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V (SCID) 
5) A history of significant medical (e.g., cardiovascular, diabetic/metabolic) or neurological (e.g., 
cerebrovascular accidents, seizure, traumatic brain injury) illness 
6) Positive answers on the cardiac history questionnaire that may place the subject at higher risk, 
as determined by an internal medicine specialist or cardiologist’s review of both the 
questionnaire responses and screening ECG
7) Current use of psychotropic and/or potentially psychoactive prescription medications
8) For females, laboratory (β-HCG) or physical evidence of pregnancy/lactation
9) MRI-incompatible implants and other contraindications for MRI (i.e., aneurysm clip, metal 
fragments, internal electrical devices such as a cochlear implant, spinal cord stimulator or 
pacemaker)
10) History of claustrophobia or feeling of inability to lie still on his/her back for the PET or MRI 
scans
11) History of any bleeding disorder or current anticoagulant therapy
12) Donation or loss of 550 mL of blood or more (including plasmapheresis) or receipt of a 
transfusion of any blood product within 8 weeks prior to the first test day.
13) Use of any prescription medications and/or over-the-counter medications, vitamins and/or 
herbal supplements which could have a negative clinical interaction with calcitriol/Dexedrine 
or which could confound scientific results of the study, within 2 weeks prior to each test day 
(e.g., thiazide diuretics, Mg based antiacids, digoxin, etc,).
14) Serum levels of 25(OH)D3 below 12 ng/ml.
15) Morbid obesity i.e. BMI over 35 (more prone to lower vitamin D levels)
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 22 of 59
16) Subjects with history of prior radiation exposure for research purposes within the past year 
such that participation in this study would place them over FDA limits for annual radiation 
exposure. This guideline is an effective dose of 5 rem received per year.
17) Subjects with current, past or anticipated exposure to radiation in the work place 
18) History of kidney stones within the past 5 years
19) Any degree of renal failure
20) History of parathyroid disorder (hyper or hypoparathyroidism)
21) History of osteoporosis or any pathologic fractures
22) Vitamin D supplementation in any form in the past 3 months 
23) Known hypersensitivity to Dexedrine, [11C]-PHNO, or calcitriol
24) Malabsorption syndromes (i.e. Celiac sprue)
25) Serum corrected calcium > 10.5 mg/dl or phosphate > 4.2 mg/dl
ADHD subjects will have the same inclusion/exclusion criteria as healthy controls with the 
following exceptions: They have DSM-5 diagnosis of ADHD (including individuals with a 
childhood/adult history of stimulant exposure and/or current stimulant use based on verbal report 
and/or positive serum/urine drug levels). Inpatient subjects will be stimulant-free at the time of 
PET scanning (>5 half-lives off stimulants). Outpatient subjects must have a verified prescription 
for stimulant medication and will continue to take it throughout the study as prescribed. 
8. How will eligibility be determined, and by whom? 
Physical health will be determined via medical history, a physical examination, neurological, ECG 
and laboratory examinations. DSM-V criteria for absence of primary Axis I psychiatric disorder 
and history of other substance dependence will be determined by the Structured Clinical Interview 
for DSM-V (SCID) performed by a member of the research staff.  In addition, medical or 
psychiatric information can be gathered as part of the screening by reviewing medical records or 
by talking with primary care providers. For outpatient ADHD subjects, a release of information is 
necessary so that study staff can contact their primary care physician or prescriber of stimulants, 
and can have access to the Connecticut Prescription Monitoring Program (CTPMP) in order to 
confirm that the subject is being prescribed stimulants (in addition to visible evidence of ongoing 
prescription use by virtue of a current active pharmacy dispensed prescription bottle). 
Contraindications to participate in PET imaging procedures will be assessed by looking at the Yale 
PET Center Database, which has information about prior participation in research studies.  
Contraindications to participate in the MRI will be assessed with the MR safety questionnaire. All 
female subjects will undergo serum or urine pregnancy (β-HCG) test to determine evidence of 
pregnancy.  Once screening is completed, research assistant will meet with study physician and 
will go over eligibility checklist.  Eligibility for ADHD subjects will follow the same study 
procedures with the addition of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 as well 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 23 of 59
as the SCID section for ADHD.
9. Risks: Describe the reasonably foreseeable risks, including risks to subject privacy, 
discomforts, or inconveniences associated with subjects participating in the research. 
The risks from this study include 1) Risks associated with unknowns, 2) Risks associated with 
intravenous line placement and blood drawing, 3) Risks associated with PET scans, 4) Risks 
associated with MRI scans, 5) Risks associated with calcitriol administration, 6) Risks associated 
with amphetamine (e.g., Dexedrine) administration, 7) Risks associated with questionnaires and 
interviews, 8) Risks associated with neurocognitive testing, and 9) Privacy/loss of 
confidentiality.
9.1. Risks Associated with Unknowns: The subject’s health and safety will always be the 
primary concern of the doctors and staff performing the study. In the event of an unexpected 
outcome, all necessary medical action will be taken. Medication might be administered as 
needed, per the Yale PET Center standard operating procedure for medical emergencies, in order 
to treat complications. 
9.2. Phlebotomy and intravenous line: As part of the screening assessments of medical 
eligibility and the [11C]-PHNO infusion during the test days, subjects will undergo phlebotomy 
and intravenous cannulation, respectively. Drawing blood and inserting an intravenous line (IV) 
into an arm vein are safe and standard medical procedures. Venous sampling may be associated 
with mild-to- moderate pain or bruising at the puncture site. Bruising and thrombosis can occur 
during phlebotomy and the placement of the intravenous line. In rare instances poor healing, or 
infection at the catheter insertion site may occur. Certain individuals may feel light-headed 
during venipuncture. The volume of blood collected during this study, may include screening 
laboratories, MRI and PET scans, will be less than 15 tablespoons.
9.3. Risks associated with the PET scans/ radiation exposure: The Yale University 
Radioactive Drug Research Committee (YNHH RSC) will review the use of radiation in this 
research study and no subjects will be scanned until RSC approval is obtained. This research 
study involves exposure to radiation from PET scanning. This radiation exposure is not 
necessary for medical care and is for research purposes only. The targeted amount of radiation an 
individual subject will receive in this study is from four injections of [11C]-PHNO (≤10 mCi each 
injection) plus associated transmission scans. However, in situations where a PET scan is not 
successful following a PET injection (e.g., problems with the PET camera) the subject may 
receive an additional PET injection, up to a total of five injections during the study, if deemed 
appropriate and below the maximum amount of radiation exposure allowed.  Although each 
organ will receive a different dose, the amount of radiation received from each 10mCi injection 
is approximately 0.167 rem.  The maximum amount of radiation exposure one may receive from 
this study is approximately 0.847 rem (taking into account a maximum of 5 possible 10mCi 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 24 of 59
[11C]-PHNO PET tracer injections should an issue arise with the PET camera). This amount of 
radiation exposure is below the annual limit of 5 rem set by the FDA and monitored by the Yale 
New Haven Hospital Radioactive Drug Research Committee (Y-NHH RSC) for research 
subjects. 
The effects of radiation exposure on humans have been studied for over 60 years and no harmful 
effect to humans has been observed from the levels of radiation subjects will receive while 
taking part in this research study. However, scientists disagree on whether radiation doses at 
these levels are harmful. It is unclear whether already low doses of radiation could cause cancer. 
Even though no effects have been observed, some scientists believe that radiation can be harmful 
at any dose - even low doses such as those received during this research.
Another concern some people may have about radiation exposure is the effect on fertility or on the 
possibility of causing harm to future children (i.e., genetic effects). The doses subjects will receive 
in the study are well below the levels needed to affect fertility. In addition, genetic effects have 
not been seen in humans who have been exposed to radiation. The information on genetic effects 
currently available is based on animal studies using much larger doses of radiation than the amount 
individuals will receive in this study.
Additional discomfort associated with receiving [11C]-PHNO: 
[11C]-PHNO has been used in humans and has been shown to be safe and well tolerated after its 
administration to healthy subjects and patients.  At the Yale PET Center, over 250 administrations 
of [11C]-PHNO have already occurred. One unexpected adverse effect (unresponsiveness for 
approximately one minute 12 minutes post-injection of [11C]-PHNO) was reported and was likely 
due to underlying cardiac history that was possibly exacerbated by study procedures. A 
comprehensive review of vital signs data was conducted on all subjects injected with [11C]-PHNO 
at the Yale University PET Center and showed no correlation or relationship of any kind between 
injection of [11C]-PHNO  and systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or heart rate 
measures. 
The most common adverse event reported has been self-limiting transient nausea shortly after 
injection (well before the peak brain uptake). The injected mass dose is limited to 0.03 µg/kg to 
minimize this effect. Several human subjects who have participated in PET studies using [11C]-
PHNO  in Toronto, Canada, have experienced nausea, emesis and other effects such as dizziness, 
headache or a warm sensation. Although the occurrence of these side effects had no relation with 
the injected mass, subject's sex, body mass or age, the mechanism of these reactions is not 
understood, but it represents a potential risk.  Nausea has been attributed to the transient high 
[11C]-PHNO concentration 2–3 min after the bolus injection of the tracer (Willeit, Ginovart et al. 
2006). 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 25 of 59
Other side effects, such as nausea/vomiting, dizziness, headache, epigastric pain, insomnia, 
psychosis, cardiac arrhythmia, hypertention, and psychosis have been reported when [11C]-
PHNO is administered with amphetamines.  These effects were not present during the timeframe 
between [11C]-PHNO and amphetamine but after the amphetamine administration.
 9.4. Risks associated with MRI scans: MR carries a risk for subjects who are claustrophobia or 
have pacemakers, metal pieces, aneurysm clips, large colored tattoos, or any other 
contraindications for MR. Magnetic resonance (MR) is a technique that uses magnetism and 
radio waves, not x-rays, to take pictures and measure chemicals of various parts of the body. The 
United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set guidelines for magnet strength and 
exposure to radio waves, and we carefully observe those guidelines. Subjects will be watched 
closely throughout the MR study. Some people may feel uncomfortable or anxious. If this 
happens, the subject may ask to stop the study at any time and we will take them out of the MR 
scanner. On rare occasions, some people might feel dizzy, get an upset stomach, have a metallic 
taste or feel tingling sensations or muscle twitches. These sensations usually go away quickly but 
we will ask subjects to tell the research staff if they have them. There are some risks with an MR 
study for certain people. If subjects have a pacemaker or some metal objects inside their body, 
they may not be in this study because the strong magnets in the MR scanner might harm them. 
Another risk is the possibility of metal objects being pulled into the magnet and hitting a subject. 
This MR study is for research purposes only and is not in any way a clinical examination. The 
scans performed in this study are not designed to find abnormalities. The primary investigator, 
the lab, the MR technologist, and the Magnetic Resonance Research Center are not qualified to 
interpret the MR scans and are not responsible for providing a diagnostic evaluation of the 
images. If a worrisome finding is seen on a subject’s scan, a radiologist or another physician will 
be asked to review the relevant images. Based on his or her recommendation (if any), the 
primary investigator or consulting physician will contact the subject, inform them of the finding, 
and recommend that they seek medical advice as a precautionary measure. The decision for 
additional examination or treatment would lie solely with the subject and their physician. The 
investigators, the consulting physician, the Magnetic Resonance Research Center, and Yale 
University are not responsible for any examination or treatment that a subject receives based on 
these findings. The images collected in this study are not a clinical MR exam and for that reason, 
they will not be made available for diagnostic purposes.
9.5. Risks associated with calcitriol administration: Potential side effects of calcitriol are 
cardiac arrhythmia, hypertension, apathy, drowsiness, headache, hyperthermia, metallic taste, 
psychosis, sensory disturbance, erythema, erythema multiforme, pruritus, skin rash, urticaria, 
albuminuria, calcinosis, decreased libido, dehydration, growth suppression, hypercalcemia, 
hypercholesterolemia, polydipsia, weight loss, abdominal pain, anorexia, constipation, nausea, 
pancreatitis, stomach pain, vomiting, xerostomia, hypercalciuria, nocturia, urinary tract infection, 
increased serum ALT, increased serum AST, hypersensitivity reaction, dystrophy, myalgia, 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 26 of 59
ostealgia, weakness, conjunctivitis, photophobia, calcium nephrolithiasis, increased blood urea 
nitrogen, increased serum creatinine, polyuria, and rhinorrhea.
Although calcitriol doses of 3 mcg are higher than doses used in treatment of vitamin D deficiency 
in kidney failure patients, they have been safely used in prior studies. In one study using higher 
doses of calcitriol than current study (e.g., up to 45 micrograms or 0.6 mcg/kg for a person whose 
weight is 70 kg, once per week, for three consecutive weeks), only one case of symptomatic kidney 
stone was reported among 125 patients (Beer, Ryan et al. 2007). It is unlikely (but yet possible) to 
have hypercalcemia in our study. Phase I studies weekly administration (e.g., up to 4 weeks) of 
doses higher than 0.48 mcg/kg showed self-limiting grade 1 hypercalcemia (Beer, Munar et al. 
2001) (Beer, Ryan et al. 2007) which resolved without treatment.  Studies with healthy controls 
(N = 11) using doses of 3 mcg per day (equivalent to the maximum dose allowed in this study), 
for 10 consecutive days, revealed one case of mild hypercalcemia on day 6.  This subject continued 
the study at doses of 1.5 mcg per day (Broadus, Erickson et al. 1984). Other studies with healthy 
controls who don’t have any malignancies administered 4 mcg of calcitriol intravenously or 1.5 
mcg mcg/m2 without significant adverse events (Bianchi, Ardissino et al. 1999, Brandi, Egfjord et 
al. 2002).
9.6. Risks associated with amphetamine administration: Risks of amphetamine 
administration include both medical and psychiatric risks. Potential side effects of d-
amphetamine administration are cardiomyopathy, hypertension, palpitations, tachycardia, 
aggressive behavior, dizziness, dysphoria, euphoria, exacerbation of tics, gilles de la Tourette's 
syndrome, headache, insomnia, mania, overstimulation, psychosis, restlessness, urticarial, 
change in libido, weight loss, anorexia, constipation, diarrhea, unpleasant taste, xerostomia, 
frequent erections, impotence, prolonged erection, dyskinesia, rhabdomyolysis, tremor, 
accommodation disturbances, and blurred vision. The frequency for several of the above side 
effects is not well defined. The frequent somatic side effects of d-amphetamine administration 
are cardiovascular (e.g. hypertension, palpitations, and tachycardia). General effects such as 
sweating, feeling warm or cold, nausea, diarrhea, muscle and abdominal cramping, have been 
reported frequently. Behavioral effects in this dose range are increased level of alertness, 
talkativeness, restlessness, agitation, mood changes (usually euphoria), and anxiety.  In 2015, 
warnings on the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors were being incorporated into the 
Canadian prescribing information for drugs used in the management of attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The new warnings advised that there have been reports 
of suicide-related events including thoughts of suicide, suicide attempts, and completed suicide.
In our experience, effects such as increased level of alertness, talkativeness, restlessness, 
agitation, and mood changes are generally transient and well tolerated. This dose of 
amphetamine has not been reported to induce psychotic symptoms in non-schizophrenic subjects. 
Infrequently blurred vision, headaches and chest tightness, and changes in EKG have been 
reported. There is a rare risk of permanent neurological damage and death as a result of cardiac 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 27 of 59
arrest or stroke.  
9.7. Risks associated with questionnaires and interviews: There are no known significant risks 
associated with the completion of interviews/questionnaires. However, subjects may become tired 
and may feel uncomfortable answering some questions about psychiatric or substance use 
disorders. 
9.8. Risks associated with neurocognitive testing: There are not specific risks associated with 
this. However; subjects may experience some frustration with some tests if they find them difficult 
or if they perceive that their performance is not as good as they expected. They may also experience 
boredom if the test becomes repetitive. Given the attention these tasks could require, they may feel 
tired after completing them. 
9.9. Privacy/loss of confidentiality: Since some of the data collected (e.g., history of substance 
use behavior) is private in nature and may have legal implications, risks related to loss of 
confidentiality also exist. 
Risks will be the same for subjects with ADHD.  Because of their history of exposure to 
stimulants, they are more likely to be tolerant/protected from risks associated with administration 
of amphetamines. 
10. Minimizing Risks: Describe the manner in which the above-mentioned risks will be 
minimized.
10.1. Risks associated with Unknowns: In the event of an unexpected outcome, all necessary 
medical action will be taken. Medication might be administered as needed, per the Yale PET 
Center standard operating procedure for medical emergencies, in order to treat complications. 
10.2. Risks of phlebotomy and intravenous line: The risks of bruising, clotting, and infection 
will be minimized by having these procedures performed by experienced personnel using aseptic 
technique and by exclusion of subjects with medical or laboratory history compatible with bleeding 
disorders. Subjects will have less than 7.5 oz. of blood (e.g., equivalent to less than 15 table spoons) 
drawn throughout the duration of the study. These amounts are well within the Red Cross blood 
standards. To avoid injury due to fainting, the catheter will be inserted when the subjects are in a 
seated/recumbent position. The blood draws will be obtained from the already inserted cannula, to 
minimize discomfort. Infection is avoided by adequate cleansing of the skin, prior to intravascular 
line insertion, and by the exclusion of immune-compromised subjects. When the IV catheter is 
removed, any bleeding will be stopped and the site will be covered with a clean dressing. Subjects 
who have donated blood within 8 weeks of the present study will be excluded. Participants will be 
told that they should not give blood for at least 8 weeks.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 28 of 59
10.3. Risks of PET Procedures: This dose of radiation will be submitted for approval to the Yale 
New Haven Hospital Radiation Safety Committee (Y-NHH RSC). All scans will be done in the 
presence of medical supervision and trained nursing staff in an institution specifically designed to 
support imaging studies. In the event of serious medical complications, the Yale University PET 
scan facilities have immediate access to or consultation with specialized medical units at the Yale-
New Haven Hospital. Preparation of radiopharmaceuticals and execution of PET scans will be 
performed by radiochemists, physicians, and technologists of the Department of Diagnostic 
Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine. These professionals are qualified by training and 
experience in the safe use and handling of radionuclides. Subjects will be asked about their 
previous radiation exposure, and those who have had research exposure within the past year will 
be excluded if their cumulative annual exposure (including the present study) exceeds FDA limits. 
Examples of the types of radiation exposure considered include x-rays taken in radiology 
departments, cardiac catheterization, and fluoroscopy as well as nuclear medicine scans in which 
radioactive materials were injected into their body.
No PET studies will be performed on pregnant or potentially pregnant women, as confirmed by 
pregnancy testing during evaluation and on each scan day before initiation of any scan procedures. 
If subjects are breastfeeding they will not be able to participate in this research study. 
In terms of the additional risks associated with [11C]-(+)-PHNO infusion, the most common 
adverse event reported has been self-limiting transient nausea shortly after injection (well before 
the peak brain uptake).  Although the occurrence of these side effects had no relation with the 
injected mass, subject's sex, body mass or age, the mechanism of these reactions is not 
understood, but it represents a potential risk.  Because nausea is attributed to the transient high 
[11C]-PHNO concentration 2–3 min after the bolus injection of the tracer (Willeit, Ginovart et al. 
2006), the Yale PET Center administers [11C]-PHNO as a bolus over a period of 5 minutes, i.e., 
at a PHNO dose rate of 7 ng/min for the average 70 kg subject. Administration of [11C]PHNO 
dose at this rate is about 5 times slower than lowest rate reported in the clinical study involving 
i.v. administration of PHNO (Coleman, Quinn et al. 1990). Every effort will be taken to 
minimize these side effects and their impact on subjects participating in the study. In terms of 
risks related with combination of [11C]-PHNO and amphetamines, we will be using doses of 
amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) lower than the doses used in other studies (Up to 0.5 mg/kg).
10.4. Risks associated with the MRI scans: To minimize risks, each subject will fill out the 
Yale Magnetic Resonance Research Center MRI Safety Questionnaire before the study. Only 
subjects who fulfill the criteria by this questionnaire will be eligible for the study. A member of 
the research staff will accompany the subject to the scan console room or magnet room and stay 
there during the scanning. Subjects will remove all metal (watch, hair pins, jewelry) and walk 
through the metal detector in the Magnetic Resonance Research Center (MRRC) before entering 
the MRI room. If the subject has any metallic prostheses/implants they will be excluded from the 
study. If a subject becomes anxious during the scan they can request that the MRI scan be 
stopped.  
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 29 of 59
10.5. Risks of calcitriol administration: Subjects will be asked to withhold any supplemental 
calcium intake, as well as to decrease consumption of foods rich in calcium content (e.g. dairy 
products, foods with milk or milk products as a main ingredient, high-calcium vegetables, 
legumes, and seafood starting 24 hours prior to each test day until 48 hours after. They will be 
asked to drink 3-4 cups (24-32 ounces) of water or electrolyte containing fluids above their usual 
intake starting 12 hours before the dose. This oral hydration will be recommended for 3 days 
after dosing (Beer, Munar et al. 2001, Beer, Javle et al. 2007). Based on literature reviewed, it is 
not expected for subjects to have hypercalcemia but if they develop it, it is expected for it to by 
asymptomatic and to resolve spontaneously without the need for treatment. Notwithstanding the 
above, subjects will be educated about these symptoms (i.e. polyuria, polydipsia, nausea, 
vomiting, constipation). Serum calcium levels will be measured each experiment day, as well as 
the day after each experiment day, in order to detect asymptomatic cases of mild hypercalcemia. 
The study will be discontinued if the calcium levels are congruent with mild hypercalcemia or 
higher than 11.5 mg/dL.  In these cases we will arrange for consultation with internal medicine 
specialists.  
10.6. Risks associated with amphetamine administration: Subjects will be excluded if they 
have significant medical history (e.g., history of coronary artery disease, arrhythmias, etc,.), 
findings of physical examination (e.g., heart murmurs, uncontrolled high blood pressure, etc,.), 
abnormal routine blood tests (e.g., elevated BUN or creatinine, etc,.), urine toxicology (e.g., 
positive for cocaine, amphetamines, etc,.) and EKG (e.g., arrhythmia, etc,.) which could pose a 
risk in the context of dexedrine’s administration. The study will be canceled on the day of the 
scan if several of the subject’s blood pressure readings are recorded at >90 for diastolic BP or 
>140 for systolic BP while at rest. Any automated blood pressure results that are abnormal will 
be repeated manually. The manual reading will be the official reading. Inclusion in the study 
will be limited to individuals who are between the ages of 18-50. Patients will also be excluded 
if they have any h/o severe medical or neurological illness, any clinically significant brain 
abnormality, and if they have recently donated blood. Administration of oral d-amphetamine 
will take place at the PET center with a physician on site and with ACLS trained nursing staff. 
Frequent EKG and vital signs’ monitoring will take place. If the systolic BP reaches or exceeds 
200 mmHg for more than 5 minutes or the diastolic BP reaches or exceeds 110 mmHg for more 
than 5 minutes, study physician can administer labetalol 20 mg IV, then 20-80 mg IV every 10 
minutes up to dose of 300 mg. A twelve lead EKG, a code cart and defibrillator are available in 
the room in case of complications. In case of chest pain, chest tightness or other symptoms 
suggestive of cardiac ischemia, the experiment will be cancelled and a twelve lead EKG will be 
immediately obtained to rule out angina (ST segment elevation or depression as compared to the 
baseline EKG). Appropriate treatment will be initiated. 
With regards to psychiatric/behavioral side effects, inclusion in this study will be limited to 
individuals who are between the ages of 18-50. No individuals with psychiatric disorders will be 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 30 of 59
recruited into this protocol, on or off medications. Before discharge, study staff will ask 
specifically about mood changes or suicidal ideation and will refer subjects to the emergency room 
or to the Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit (CNRU) if warranted as a result of this interview. 
Upon discharge, subjects will be given the phone numbers of the study physicians. Subjects will 
be encouraged to call study physicians in case they had any side effects. On the follow up session 
designed for serum calcium measurements, a study physician will interview subjects in order to 
make sure that they don’t have any side residual effects and/or changes compared to their baseline 
level before initiating this study. 
10.7. Risks associated with questionnaires / interviews: Subjects will have short breaks between 
questionnaires/interviews. The staff responsible for the data collection has received training in 
empathetic/non-judgmental techniques for interviewing and will explain to subjects the 
confidentiality of information. Any identifiable information that is obtained in connection with 
this study will remain confidential and will be disclosed only with the subject’s permission or as 
required by U.S. or State law. Examples of information that we are legally required to disclose 
include abuse of a child or elderly person, or certain reportable diseases. All of the information 
obtained in this study is stored in locked files or password protected computer files. The only ones 
who have access to this information are the medical personnel and the research staff at the CNRU. 
When the results of the research are published or discussed in conferences, no information will be 
included that would reveal subject’s identity. 
10.8. Risks associated with neurocognitive testing: In order to decrease any frustration with the 
tests or with subjects’ perception of how they are performing on those, the study staff will have 
clear written instructions. These instructions will clarify how some tests are meant to be 
challenging. The study staff will also make sure that the cognitive test is not preceded by study 
procedures, which are cognitively demanding, thus, subjects can focus well.
10.9. Risks associated with privacy/loss of confidentiality (Data Security): Security of user 
information is of paramount importance to us. Research personnel will not contact any person 
without appropriate written release of information. All information collected will be kept in 
password-protected, HIPAA-compliant computers, secured using the best available methods. 
Information collected during the telephone screening will be discarded in cases when subject is 
not eligible for a screening in person. Research records will be kept as confidential as possible. 
Only a code number will identify subject research records. The code number will not be based on 
any information that could be used to identify subjects (for example, social security number, 
initials, birth date, etc.). The master list linking names to code numbers will be kept separately 
from the research data. This master list, as well as all the other research information will be kept 
in locked files at all times, in Dr. Potenza’s /Dr. Angarita’s laboratory. Subjects’ identity will not 
be revealed in any reports or publications resulting from this study. Only authorized persons will 
have access to the information gathered in this study. As part of the study procedures, some 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 31 of 59
information about subject’s participation will become part of their CMHC medical record. If a 
subject does not already have a medical record at CMHC, one will be made for their visit. 
Moreover, if a subject has been a patient at CMHC at any time, his or her previous medical 
records of other visits or admissions will become available to the researchers and to the staff of 
the CMHC, as part of the screening, or when the information collected for this research is added 
into their medical record. Information will be stored as per HIPAA guidelines. All staff has been 
trained in accordance with HIPAA regulations. Information will not be dispensed to anyone 
outside of this research project (e.g. , Yale HIC, CMHC, Yale Magnetic Resonance Research 
Center, and Yale PET Imaging Center) without prior written authorization from the subject. If 
we see or are told that a child is being abused or neglected or that there is a risk of harm to 
subject or others, we will disclose this information to the proper authorities. As part of the video 
(e.g., Skype or Facetime) conference call, subjects will not need to disclose any information 
about them given that principal investigator will be able to confirm their identity through the 
camera. 
Procedures to minimize risks will be the same for subjects with ADHD.  However; there will be 
no concerns/risks related with Skype or Facetime interview as this will not be required for them.
11. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan: Include an appropriate Data and Safety Monitoring Plan 
(DSMP) based on the investigator’s risk assessment stated below. (Note: the HIC will make 
the final determination of the risk to subjects.) For more information, see the Instructions, 
page 24.
a.
What is the investigator’s assessment of the overall risk level for subjects 
participating in this study? 
Moderate risk
b.
If children are involved, what is the investigator’s assessment of the overall risk 
level for the children participating in this study? 
c.
Include an appropriate Data and Safety Monitoring Plan. Examples of DSMPs are  
 available here http://www.yale.edu/hrpp/forms-templates/biomedical.html  for
i. Minimal risk
ii. Greater than minimal
d. For multi-site studies for which the Yale PI serves as the lead investigator:
i. How will adverse events and unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or 
others be reported, reviewed and managed?
ii. What provisions are in place for management of interim results?
iii. What will the multi-site process be for protocol modifications?
1. Personnel responsible for the safety review and its frequency: 
The principal investigator will be responsible for monitoring the data, assuring protocol 
compliance, and conducting the safety reviews in real time (e.g., on a weekly or bi-weekly basis 
as part of the Yale Cocaine Clinic rounds). During the review process, the principal investigator 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 32 of 59
will evaluate whether the study should continue unchanged, require modification/amendment, or 
be close to enrollment. Either the principal investigator or the IRB have the authority to stop/ 
suspend the study or require modifications. 
2. The risks associated with the current study are deemed moderate for the following 
reasons: 
We do not view the risks associated with the [11C]-PHNO PET, and/or medication administration 
component as minimal. Although we have assessed the proposed study as one of moderate risk, 
the potential exists for anticipated and/or unanticipated adverse events, serious or otherwise, to 
occur since it is not possible to predict with certainty the absolute risk in any given individual or 
in advance of first-hand experience with the proposed study methods. Therefore, we provide a plan 
for monitoring the data and safety of the proposed study as follows: 
3. Attribution of Adverse Events: 
Adverse events will be monitored for each subject participating in the study and attributed to the 
study procedures / design by Dr. Marc Potenza, MD, PhD / Dr. Gustavo A. Angarita, MD 
according to the following categories: 
a) Definite: Adverse event is clearly related to investigational procedures(s)/agent(s). 
b) Probable: Adverse event is likely related to investigational procedures(s)/agent(s). 
c) Possible: Adverse event may be related to investigational procedures(s)/agent(s). 
d) Unlikely: Adverse event is likely not to be related to the investigational 
procedures(s)/agent(s). 
e) Unrelated: Adverse event is clearly not related to investigational procedures(s)/agent(s). 
4. Plan for Grading Adverse Events: 
The following scale will be used in grading the severity of adverse events noted during the study: 
A. Mild adverse event
B. Moderate adverse event
C. Severe adverse event
5. Plan for Determining Seriousness of Adverse Events: 
Serious Adverse Events: In addition to grading the adverse event, the PI will determine whether 
the adverse event meets the criteria for a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). An adverse event is 
considered serious if it: 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 33 of 59
1) is life-threatening OR  
2) results in in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization OR  
3) results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity OR
4) results in a congenital anomaly or birth defect OR  
5) results in death OR  
6) based upon appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject’s health and may 
 require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in this 
 definition, OR  
7) adversely affects the risk/benefit ratio of the study  
An adverse event may be graded as severe but still not meet the criteria for a Serious Adverse 
Event. Similarly, an adverse event may be graded as moderate but still meet the criteria for an 
SAE. It is important for the PI to consider the grade of the event as well as its “seriousness” 
when determining whether reporting to the HIC is necessary.
6. Plan for reporting Reportable Adverse Events and other unanticipated problems 
involving risks to subjects or others to the IRB 
The principal investigator will report the following types of events to the HIC and the funding 
agency: a) serious AND unanticipated AND possibly, probably or definitely related events; b) 
anticipated adverse events occurring with a greater frequency than expected; and c) other 
unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others.
These adverse events or unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others will be 
reported to the HIC within 24-48 hours of it becoming known to the investigator, using the 
appropriate forms found on the website.
 7. Plan for reporting adverse events to co-investigators on the study, as appropriate the 
protocol’s research monitor(s), e.g., industrial sponsor, Yale Cancer Center Data and Safety 
Monitoring Committee (DSMC), Protocol Review Committee (PRC), DSMBs, study 
sponsors, funding and regulatory agencies, and regulatory and decision-making bodies. 
For the current study, the following individuals, funding, and/or regulatory agencies will be 
notified (choose those that apply): 
 All Co-Investigators listed on the protocol. 
□ Yale Cancer Center Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC)
□ National Institutes of Health 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 34 of 59
 Yale University Radioactive Drug Research Committee (YU RDRC), if applicable
 Food and Drug Administration (Yale PET Center Sponsored IND #134,138), if applicable
□ Medical Research Foundation (Grant______) 
 The Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
The principal investigator Marc Potenza, MD, PhD will also conduct a review of all adverse events 
upon completion of every study subject. The principal investigator will evaluate the frequency and 
severity of the adverse events and determine if modifications to the protocol or consent form are 
required.  DSMP and plan for reporting adverse events will be the same for ADHD subjects. 
12. Statistical Considerations: Describe the statistical analyses that support the study design. 
Data Analysis: The PET image sets are aligned and re-sliced to yield images in the same 
planes and spatial system as the MRI images using AAL template. A number of modeling 
approaches will be taken to quantitate binding potentials (BPND). Initially, the primary focus 
will be on reference region approaches, specifically the Simplified Reference Tissue Models 
(SRTM); i.e., time-activity curves will be fitted with the Simplified reference tissue model to 
extract binding potentials (BPND) in various brain regions.
Data Analyses: The primary outcome will be non-displaceable tracer binding potentials (BPND = 
VT – VREF / VREF), which are linearly proportional to the density of available D2/3 Rs, computed 
using a simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) utilizing the cerebellum as a reference region. 
This method has been previously validated.  PET data will be reconstructed into images at Yale 
PET Center with all standard corrections using the appropriate reconstruction protocols and 
filters. All PET data will be reconstructed with an iterative reconstruction algorithm, MOLAR, 
designed specifically for the HRRT. MOLAR incorporates attenuation, scatter and deadtime, and 
subject-motion (detected by the Vicra system), into the forward projection model for the 
scanner.  Emission images are binned into equal frame times (typically 3 minutes).  Following 
image reconstruction, an early summed image (0-12 min) will be registered to the subject's MR 
image, which will be registered to an MR template so PET can be transformed to a standard 
(MNI) space. HYPR filtering will be applied to all emission data before analysis. Regions of 
interest will be the caudate, putamen, ventral striatum (VST), and substantia nigra / ventral 
tegmental area (SN/VTA).  We will perform within-subject comparisons of the relative change in 
BPND elicited by calcitriol + Amp vs. placebo + Amp (BPND), using appropriate parametric 
(paired t-) or non-parametric (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) tests. Although the proposed sample 
will enable detection of significant differences of moderate effect sizes (d' = 0.59) with a power 
of 0.8 and two-tailed alpha of 0.05, the sample will, at a minimum, provide estimates of effect 
size/power upon which future larger scales studies may be based. This effect size is congruent 
with preclinical work (Cass, Peters et al. 2012) and with clinical [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [11C] 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 35 of 59
Raclopride studies (Shotbolt, Tziortzi et al. 2012). In secondary analyses, we will examine 
correlations (Pearson’s) between cognitive (e.g., CPT-IP and PRLT), psychomotor (e.g., eye 
blink rate), and subjective (e.g., DEQ and simplified version of the amphetamine interview rating 
scale) measurements and neuroimaging outcomes/stimulant effects. 
Statistical analyses will be the same for subjects with ADHD.
SECTION VI: RESEARCH INVOLVING DRUGS, BIOLOGICS, RADIOTRACERS, PLACEBOS AND 
DEVICES
If this section (or one of its parts, A or B) is not applicable, state N/A and delete the rest of the 
section.
A.  DRUGS, BIOLOGICS and RADIOTRACERS
1. Identification of Drug, Biologic or Radiotracer: What is (are) the name(s) of the drug(s) 
biologic(s) or radiotracer(s) being used? Identify whether FDA approval has been granted and for what 
indication(s). 
Radiotracer ([11C]-PHNO): At the Yale PET center, we have characterized and applied an improved 
agonist radiotracer for the D2/3 receptor, [11C]-PHNO, demonstrating its excellent test-retest 
variability in striatum (Gallezot et al., 2014b) and its greater sensitivity to Amp-induced DA release 
relative to traditional antagonist ligands (i.e., [11C]-raclopride) (Shotbolt et al., 2012). As such, [11C]-
PHNO constitutes an optimal tracer for our proposed studies evaluating the effects of calcitriol on 
stimulant-induced DA release in humans.  In addition, our group has considerable experience 
conducting such experiments with dextro-ampethamine challenges and [11C]-PHNO in humans. 
 [11C]-PHNO has been approved by the RDRC for use in previous human PET protocols at the Yale 
University PET Center.  In addition, an IND was submitted to the FDA for the use of [11C]-PHNO in 
another protocol at the Yale University PET Center.  This IND was approved.  We will add current 
protocol to that IND and we will also submit current protocol for approval by the Yale University 
RSC.  
Calcitriol: The active form of vitamin D3, is approved for the treatment of hypocalcemia in patients on 
chronic renal dialysis, hypocalcemia in hypoparathyroidism/pseudohypoparathyroidism, vitamin D 
resistant rickets, and secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with moderate to severe chronic 
kidney disease not yet on dialysis.  Another approved indication is psoriasis (e.g., topically).  An off-
label use is Vitamin D-dependent rickets type 1/pseudovitamin D deficiency rickets (PDDR). There 
have been phase I and phase II clinical studies on calcitriol for cancer (Beer, Munar et al. 2001, Beer, 
Javle et al. 2007, Beer, Ryan et al. 2007, Ramnath, Daignault-Newton et al. 2013).  In terms of the oral 
administration, calcitriol comes in capsules of 0.5 mcg.  The US labeling recommends doses up to 1 
mg per day (e.g., for hypocalcemia in patients on chronic renal dialysis) or up to 2 mcg per day (e.g., 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 36 of 59
for hypocalcemia in hypoparathyroidism/pseudohypoparathyroidism).  To the best of our knowledge, 
calcitriol has never been tested/used in human subjects as an adjunct to stimulant medications. 
Dextro-amphetamine (Dexedrine): Is a centrally acting sympathomimetic amine that promote release 
of catecholamines (primarily dopamine and norepinephrine) from their storage sites in the presynaptic 
nerve terminals. Another mechanism includes its ability to block the reuptake of catecholamines. It 
has ben approved for treatment of Narcolepsy (e.g., doses up to 60 mg per day) and Attention Deficit 
Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (e.g., doses up to 40 mg per day).  It comes in tablets of 5, 7.5, 10, 
15, 20, and 30 mg.
Radiotracer, calcitriol, and Dexedrine will be the same for ADHD subjects.
All protocols which utilize a drug, biologic or radiotracer not approved by, but regulated by, the FDA, 
or a radiotracer regulated by the RDRC, must provide the following information:  
a.
What is the Investigational New Drug (IND) number assigned by the FDA?
b. IND # for 11C-PHNO is 134,138
c.
Who holds the IND? 
Yale University PET Imaging Center
c. All protocols which utilize a radiotracer not approved by, but regulated by the FDA must 
provide the IND number: ____134,138___________
Alternatively, use of the investigational radiotracer may be under RDRC/RSC oversight: (check 
if appropriate)_____________
For all investigational radiotracers, attach a copy of the RDRC/RSC application (for 
radioisotopes used in the PET Center, PET Center personnel may complete this step)
Go to http://rsc.med.yale.edu/login.asp?url=myApps.asp.  When you have logged in, complete 
the application and attach a copy to this submission.     
Alternatively, an exemption from IND filing requirements may be sought for a clinical
 investigation of a drug product that is lawfully marketed in the United States. If there is no IND and
 an exemption is being sought, review the following categories and complete the category that applies
 (and delete the inapplicable categories):
Exempt Category 1 for the calcitriol and dextro-amphetamines
The clinical investigation of a drug product that is lawfully marketed in the United States can be
exempt from IND regulations if all of the following are yes:
i.   The intention of the investigation is NOT to report to the FDA as a well-controlled study in support
     of a new indication for use or to be used to support any other significant change in the labeling for
     the drug. 
  Yes  
 No
ii. The drug that is undergoing investigation is lawfully marketed as a prescription drug product, and
      the intention of the investigation is NOT to support a significant change in the advertising for the
      product. 
  Yes  
 No
iii.  The investigation does NOT involve a route of administration or dosage level or use in populations
      or other factor that significantly increases the risks (or decreases the acceptability of the risks)   
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 37 of 59
      associated with the use of the drug product. 
  Yes  
 No
iv. The investigation will be conducted in compliance with the requirements for institutional (HIC)   
      review and with the requirements for informed consent of the FDA regulations (21 CFR Part 50  
and 21 CFR Part 56). 
  Yes  
 No
v.   The investigation will be conducted in compliance with the requirements regarding promotion and 
charging for investigational drugs. 
  Yes  
 No
Exempt Category 2 (all items i, ii, and iii must be checked to grant a category 2 exemption)
 i. The clinical investigation is for an in vitro diagnostic biological product that involves one or
more of the following (check all that apply):
 Blood grouping serum
 Reagent red blood cells 
 Anti-human globulin
 ii. The diagnostic test is intended to be used in a diagnostic procedure that confirms the
diagnosis made by another, medically established, diagnostic product or procedure; and
 iii. The diagnostic test is shipped in compliance with 21 CFR §312.160.
Exempt Category 3
 The drug is intended solely for tests in vitro or in laboratory research animals if shipped in 
accordance with 21 CFR 312.60
Exempt Category 4
 A clinical investigation involving use of a placebo if the investigation does not otherwise 
require submission of an IND.
Background Information: Provide a description of previous human use, known risks, and data 
addressing dosage(s), interval(s), route(s) of administration, and any other factors that might 
influence risks. If this is the first time this drug is being administered to humans, include relevant 
data on animal models. 
[11C]-PHNO has been used in several PET centers (Ginovart, Willeit et al. 2007).  It was initially 
developed at the PET Center, University of Toronto, and the safety of its use in humans has been 
demonstrated.  
[11C]-PHNO has been used extensively used in many clinical trials. A survey of the 
ClinicalTrials.gov website shows 12 completed trials, 5 recruiting trials, and 1 active clinical trial 
with [11C]-PHNO investigating a variety of behaviors and disorders: alcohol drinking, addictive 
behavior, behavioral symptoms, cocaine-related disorders, compulsive behavior, depression, 
depressive disorder, drinking behavior, impulsive behavior, mental disorders, mood disorders, 
obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychotic disorders, schizophrenia studies, schizophrenia spectrum 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 38 of 59
and other psychotic disorders, psychological stress, substance-related disorders, and tobacco use 
disorder. 
The use of [11C]-PHNO in PET imaging in human was first reported in 2006 (Willeit, Ginovart et al. 
2006). No relevant abnormalities in blood pressure, heart rate, or ECG were reported at any time in 
the study. There also were no relevant findings in physical or neurological exams or in routine blood 
and urine analyses during the study. However nausea was reported approximately 2–3 min after 
tracer injection, which subsided rapidly 2–3 min later. This effect was attributed to the transient high 
[11C]-PHNO concentration resulting from the bolus injection (Willeit, Ginovart et al. 2006).
Four hundred and eighty six [11C]-PHNO human PET scans have been reviewed to assess the side 
effect profile and their recurrence (Mizrahi, Houle et al. 2010). The injected mass ranged from 0.85 
to 5.56 µg, with a mean of 2.30 µg. Injected doses ranged from 0.01 to 0.08 µg/kg, with a mean of 
0.03 µg/kg (SE, 0.0004 µg/kg). Medical attention was not required for any of the reviewed cases, and 
no side effects were reported in 84.6% of the scans reviewed. Nausea was reported in 14.3%, while 
vomiting was reported in 1.1%. These symptoms seem to have arose 3–5 min after the injection and 
subsided within 7–12 min in all cases. The review concluded that [11C]-PHNO dose of ≤ 0.029 µg/kg 
is highly unlikely to produce any side effects. Furthermore, there was no relationship between dose 
and nausea for [11C]-PHNO doses of ≤ 0.029 µg/kg. 
We have now administered [11C]-PHNO to human subjects over 250 times at the Yale PET Center. 
All injected doses were limited to ≤ 0.03 µg/kg. These studies included smokers, cocaine users, 
pathological gamblers, schizophrenia subjects, and healthy controls.  One unexpected adverse effect 
(unresponsiveness for approximately one minute) 12 minutes post-injection of [11C]-PHNO was 
reported and was likely due to underlying cardiac history that was possibly exacerbated by study 
procedures. A comprehensive review of vital signs data was conducted on all subjects injected with 
[11C]-PHNO at the Yale University PET Center and showed no correlation or relationship of any kind 
between injection of [11C]-PHNO and systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or heart rate 
measures.
Adverse events were observed in studies which involved administration of amphetamine in addition 
to [11C]-PHNO. The typical protocol involved a morning [11C]-PHNO administration, followed by 
oral amphetamine, followed by a second PHNO injection, starting 3 hours post-amphetamine. 
Because nausea is attributed to the transient high [11C]-PHNO concentration 2–3 min after the bolus 
injection of the tracer (Willeit, Ginovart et al. 2006), the Yale PET Center administers [11C]-PHNO 
as a bolus over a period of 5 minutes, i.e., at a PHNO dose rate of 7 ng/min for the average 70 kg 
subject. Administration of [11C]-PHNO dose at this rate is about 5 times slower than lowest rate 
reported in the clinical study involving i.v. administration of PHNO (Coleman, Quinn et al. 1990).
For the studies involving amphetamine, 30 research subjects participated, of whom 21 received two 
[11C]-PHNO injections each, and 9 subjects received a single [11C]-PHNO injection, for a total of 51 
injections. Five subjects received a single injection of PHNO and did not receive amphetamine, and 
none experienced an adverse event. Twenty five subjects received both PHNO and amphetamine. No 
adverse events were experienced from the time immediately following the first PHNO injection 
(baseline) until amphetamine administration. Adverse events occurred in 6 of 25 subjects (24%), after 
amphetamine dosing. In 4 of the 6 subjects, the adverse event began 30-90 minutes after dosing with 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 39 of 59
amphetamine (4 of 25; 16%), but before the second PHNO administration. In 2 of the 6 subjects, the 
adverse event began approximately 3 hours after dosing with amphetamine (2 of 25, 8%), i.e., after 
the second [11C]-PHNO.   Adverse events reported on these 6 subjects were nausea/vomiting, 
dizziness, headache, epigastric pain, insomnia, psychosis, cardiac arrhythmia, hypertention, and 
psychosis.
 Calcitriol: The frequency for potential side effects (e.g., please, see detailed description for these on
section 9.5) of calcitriol is not well defined.  There are certain circumstances that can increase the 
probabilities of adverse events, such as impaired kidney function, impaired liver function, high
phosphorus, interaction with drugs/supplements that can increase calcium levels or that can cause 
complications in the setting of elevated calcium levels (e.g., cardiac glycosides), and
vulnerability/recent history of kidney stones.  There are studies using weekly doses of calcitriol among 
patients with malignancies.  Each cycle consisted of 4 weekly administrations followed by 4 weeks of 
observation.  Patients who tolerated each cycle proceeded to the next cycle up to weekly doses as high 
as 2 mcg/kg. This study revealed 8 instances of self-limited hypercalcemia and did not reveal toxicities 
requiring any medical intervention. As part of this study, authors proposed doses of 0.5 mcg/kg for phase 
II studies (Beer, Munar et al. 2001).  There are also pharmacokinetic studies among healthy controls 
without any malignancies using intravenous or oral doses of 4 mcg and which did not show any 
significant side effects (Brandi, Egfjord et al. 2002).  There are also studies among healthy controls 
using it at doses of 1.5 mcg/meter2 of body surface area (N = 10) (Bianchi, Ardissino et al. 1999) or at 
doses of 3 mcg per day (N = 11) (Broadus, Erickson et al. 1984, Erickson, Cooper et al. 1984), which 
did not show significant side effects.  The latter studies administered it for 10 consecutive days.  
Subjects who have circumstances increasing risks of potential side effects will be excluded.  In
addition, we will monitor calcium levels as part of the study and we will have in place preventive 
actions that could decrease risks of potential side effects (e.g., modification of diet, higher intake of 
water, avoiding medications that could interact with calcium or calcitriol). We also preferred to split the 
total dose of 3 mcg in two different administrations of 1.5 mcg for ease of administration (e.g., three 
capsules will be easier than six), to maximize chances that [11C]PHNO scans are conducted after 
calcitriol has worked (e.g., Onset of action after 2 hours; maximum effect after 10 hours; duration of 
effect is 3 to 5 days), and to maximize chances of subjects tolerating it.  
Dexedrine: Most a complete list of potential side effects, please see section 9.6. Dexedrine is 
Clinically used in humans for treatment of ADHD and Narcolepsy at daily doses ranging from 5 to 60 
mg.  We have also experienced using it for our PET imaging studies with doses of 0.4 and 0.5 mg/kg. 
Proposed dose for this study of 0.3 mg/kg will be equivalent to 30 mg in a subject whose weight is 
100 kg, thus within the doses FDA approved for therapeutic purposes.  In terms of conditions 
increasing risks of side effects, subjects who have those will be excluded from the study.  We will 
also monitor subjects throughout the study in order to early capture presence of any significant side 
effects (e.g., cardiovascular, psychiatric, or of any other nature). We will use the oral route due to the 
greater safety and ease of administration. 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 40 of 59
Taking into account that there are no studies administering calcitriol the same day as dextro-
amphetamines, we will use doses of each drug lower than the doses we have used before.  
3. Source: a) Identify the source of the drug or biologic to be used. 
[11C]-PHNO prepared at the Yale PET Center. 
Calcitriol capsules and Dexedrine tablets will be provided by the CMHC pharmacy.
b) Is the drug provided free of charge to subjects? 
  Yes  
 No
    If yes, by whom? 
4. Storage, Preparation and Use: Describe the method of storage, preparation, stability information, 
and for parenteral products, method of sterilization and method of testing sterility and 
pyrogenicity. 
Check applicable Investigational Drug Service utilized:
     
   YNHH IDS                                                                      
   Yale Cancer Center 
     
    CMHC Pharmacy                                                          
  West Haven VA
     
   PET Center                                                     
    None      
     
    Other: 
Note: If the YNHH IDS (or comparable service at CMHC or WHVA) will not be utilized, explain in 
detail how the PI will oversee these aspects of drug accountability, storage, and preparation.  
  
Due to the short half-life, PET drugs are prepared and formulated immediately before 
administration, and therefore there are no issues with storage or stability. PET drug products are 
stored at room temperature and are stable for at least 60 min after preparation.
The preparation of sterile PET drug products is validated prior to human use. Sterility is achieved 
by passing the PET drug product through a 0.22 micron membrane filter during the last step in 
the formulation process. Prior to release for administration, a bubble point test is performed on 
the membrane filter used for terminal sterilization in order to validate and verify its integrity 
during the filtration process. Due to the short half-life, a sample of the PET drug product is tested 
for sterility after administration for further confirmation.  The level of endotoxin in each batch of 
the final PET drug product is determined quantitatively prior to release for administration using 
the FDA approved Charles River Laboratory’s Portable Testing System (Endosafe®-PTS).
[11C]-PHNO will be prepared at the Yale PET Center in high radiochemical purity and high 
specific activity in accordance with our local Chemistry Manufacturing & Control (CMC) 
procedures and quality specifications described in local Drug Master File (DMF).
[11C]-PHNO will be prepared at the Yale PET Center in high radiochemical purity and high 
specific activity in accordance with our local Chemistry Manufacturing & Control (CMC) 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 41 of 59
procedures and quality specifications described in local Drug Master File (DMF). Briefly, 
[11C]propionyl chloride is prepared by reaction of [11C]CO2 with ethylmagnesium bromide, 
followed by treatment with phthaloyl dichloride. Then, N-acylation of the naphthoxazine 
precursor with [11C]propionyl chloride, followed by reduction of the resulting [11C]amide 
intermediate, yields [11C]-PHNO. The resulting PET drug product is purified first by semi-
preparative HPLC, followed by solid-phase extraction to remove the HPLC buffer mixture. 
Finally [11C]-PHNO is formulated in <10% ethanolic saline solution (USP), and the resulting 
PET drug product is then passed through a 0.22 micron sterile membrane filter for terminal 
sterilization and collected in a sterile pyrogen free collection vial to afford a formulated I.V. 
solution ready for dispensing and administration.
5. Use of Placebo:  X Not applicable to this research project
If use of a placebo is planned, provide a justification which addresses the following:
1.
Describe the safety and efficacy of other available therapies. If there are no other
available therapies, state this.
b.   State the maximum total length of time a participant may receive placebo while on the study. 
c.   Address the greatest potential harm that may come to a participant as a result of  receiving    
  
   placebo. 
d.   Describe the procedures that are in place to safeguard participants receiving placebo. 
6. Use of Controlled Substances:
Will this research project involve the use of controlled substances in human subjects?
       
  Yes  
 No See HIC Application Instructions to view controlled substance listings. 
If yes, is the use of the controlled substance considered:
 Therapeutic: The use of the controlled substance, within the context of the research, has the 
potential to benefit the research participant.
       
  Non-Therapeutic: Note, the use of a controlled substance in a non-therapeutic research study 
involving human subjects may require that the investigator obtain a Laboratory Research License. 
Examples include controlled substances used for basic imaging, observation or biochemical 
studies or other non-therapeutic purposes. See Instructions for further information.
Dextro-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) will be given to each subject, by mouth, each experiment day, 
2.5 hours after administration of calcitriol or placebo. 
7. Continuation of Drug Therapy After Study Closure  X Not applicable to this project
Are subjects provided the opportunity to continue to receive the study drug(s) after the study has 
ended?
 
 Yes   If yes, describe the conditions under which continued access to study drug(s) may apply 
as well as conditions for termination of such access. 
 
  No    If no, explain why this is acceptable.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 42 of 59
SECTION VII: RECRUITMENT/CONSENT AND ASSENT PROCEDURES 
1. Targeted Enrollment: Give the number of subjects:
a.
  targeted for enrollment at Yale for this protocol__60 (30 per cohort)_
b.    If this is a multi-site study, give the total number of subjects targeted across all 
sites__Single-site_ 
2. Indicate recruitment methods below.  Attach copies of any recruitment materials that will be used.
  Flyers
            
  Internet/Web Postings
            
  Radio
  Posters
 Mass E-mail Solicitation
 Telephone
 Letter
 
 Departmental/Center Website
 Television
 Medical Record Review*
 Departmental/Center Research Boards     
  Newspaper
 Departmental/Center Newsletters
 Web-Based Clinical Trial Registries
  YCCI Recruitment database
            
  Clinicaltrials.gov Registry (do not send materials to HIC)
  Other (describe): Word of mouth referrals; YCCI Facebook/Twitter
*Requests for medical records should be made through JDAT as described at 
http://medicine.yale.edu/ycci/oncore/availableservices/datarequests/datarequests.aspx
3.  Recruitment Procedures: 
a.
Describe how potential subjects will be identified.
Subject will be recruited through the methods listed above such as flyers, radio adds, 
word of mouth referrals (see written material attached to protocol). 
b.
Describe how potential subjects are contacted. 
      Potential subjects will be encouraged to contact our study recruitment line for inclusion 
      in our study.   
c.
Who is recruiting potential subjects? 
 Subjects are recruited through our recruitment phone line. Subjects are asked to call in
on our dedicated recruitment line. A member of our research staff will describe the 
study to participants who call, answer any questions the potential subjects has, and 
 then complete a phone screening questionnaire to determine the subjects eligibility for
an in-person screening visit. Subjects who are considered eligible based on this phone screening 
will be identified as potential participants therefore invited for the screening in person. 
If an individual appears to meet enrollment criteria and is interested in participating, a face-to- 
face interview is conducted by the study staff and study physician. A release of information is 
obtained for review of any available historical and clinical data. A written authorization form is 
also obtained from each subject, permitting the research team to use, create, or disclose the 
subject's PHI for research purposes. The nature of the project, procedures, relative risks and 
benefits, and alternatives to participation in the project are discussed with the individual. 
Following this discussion, the individual is given a copy of the consent form to review, and any 
questions are answered. The process of informed consent will be obtained in accordance with 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 43 of 59
local IRB standards by study personnel who have participated in institutionally approved training 
in human subject protection. Upon obtaining voluntary, written, informed consent, medical and 
psychiatric screening procedures will be used to confirm study eligibility. Subjects are free to 
discontinue their participation in the research at any time.
4. Screening Procedures
a.
Will email or telephone correspondence be used to screen potential subjects for 
eligibility prior to the potential subject coming to the research office? 
 Yes  
 No
b.
 If yes, identify below all health information to be collected as part of screening and 
check off any of the following HIPAA identifiers to be collected and retained by the 
research team during this screening process. 
HEALTH INFORMATION TO BE COLLECTED:
HIPAA identifiers: 
Names 
 All geographic subdivisions smaller than a State, including: street address, city, county, precinct, zip codes and their 
equivalent geocodes, except for the initial three digits of a zip code if, according to the current publicly-available data from 
the Bureau of the Census: (1) the geographic unit formed by combining all zip codes with the same three initial digits 
contains more than 20,000 people, and (2) the initial three digits of a zip code for all such geographic units containing 
20,000 or fewer people is changed to 000. 
  Telephone numbers
 Fax numbers 
 E-mail addresses
 Social Security numbers 
 Medical record numbers
 Health plan beneficiary numbers 
 Account numbers 
  All elements of dates (except year) for dates related to an individual, including: birth date, admission date, discharge 
date, date of death, all ages over 89 and all elements of dates (including year) indicative of such age, except that such ages 
and elements may be aggregated into a single category of age 90 or older 
 Certificate/license numbers 
 Vehicle identifiers and serial numbers, including license plate numbers 
 Device identifiers and serial numbers 
 Web Universal Resource Locators (URLs) 
 Internet Protocol (IP) address numbers 
 Biometric identifiers, including finger and voice prints 
 Full face photographic images and any comparable images 
 Any other unique identifying numbers, characteristics, or codes 
Recruitment and screening procedures are the same for ADHD subjects.
5. Assessment of Current Health Provider Relationship for HIPAA Consideration:
Does the Investigator or any member of the research team have a direct existing clinical 
relationship with any potential subject? 
 Yes, all subjects
 Yes, some of the subjects
   
  No
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 44 of 59
If yes, describe the nature of this relationship.
6. Request for waiver of HIPAA authorization: (When requesting a waiver of HIPAA Authorization 
for either the entire study, or for recruitment purposes only.  Note: if you are collecting PHI as part of 
a phone or email screen, you must request a HIPAA waiver for recruitment purposes.)
Choose one: 
☐ For entire study 
      
  For recruitment purposes only
☐ For inclusion of non-English speaking subject if short form is being used and a 
translated HIPAA research authorization form is not available on the University’s HIPAA 
website
i. Describe why it would be impracticable to obtain the subject’s authorization for 
use/disclosure of this data;
The information we are collecting over the phone is required prior to the subject being 
considered for an in-person screening appointment.  
ii. If requesting a waiver of signed authorization, describe why it would be 
impracticable to obtain the subject’s signed authorization for use/disclosure of this 
data;
By signing this protocol application, the investigator assures that the protected 
health information for which a Waiver of Authorization has been requested will not 
be reused or disclosed to any person or entity other than those listed in this 
application, except as required by law, for authorized oversight of this research 
study, or as specifically approved for use in another study by an IRB.
Researchers are reminded that unauthorized disclosures of PHI to individuals outside of the Yale 
HIPAA-Covered entity must be accounted for in the “accounting for disclosures log”, by subject 
name, purpose, date, recipients, and a description of information provided.  Logs are to be 
forwarded to the Deputy HIPAA Privacy Officer.
7. Required HIPAA Authorization: If the research involves the creation, use or disclosure of 
protected health information (PHI), separate subject authorization is required under the 
HIPAA Privacy Rule. Indicate which of the following forms are being provided:
            
  Compound Consent and Authorization form
 HIPAA Research Authorization Form
8. Consent Personnel: List the names of all members of the research team who will be obtaining 
consent/assent. 
Consenting personnel is listed in IRES IRB.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 45 of 59
9. Process of Consent/Assent: Describe the setting and conditions under which consent/assent will 
be obtained, including parental permission or surrogate permission and the steps taken to ensure 
subjects’ independent decision-making. 
All subjects will be consented through a multi-step consent process. Subjects are first described 
the study in detail over the phone during the phone screen.  Health information such as medical, 
psychiatric, and substance use history, questions about presence of metal in their bodies, and 
information about current medications.  If subjects are deemed appropriate from the phone 
screen, they are then invited to come the in-person screening appointment on the Clinical 
Neuroscience Research Unit. Consenting personnel will meet with the subject in person, explain 
both the consent form and the protocol and answer any questions the subject might have. The 
subject will be given a copy of the consent to read, at their leisure, prior to signing. Once the 
subject has signed the consent form the screening visit procedures will begin.  This will take 
place at the Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit of CMHC.
Remote screening option: Subjects who pass telephone screening will be invited to a more in-
depth screening to determine study eligibility (as listed in section on inclusion/exclusion 
criteria).  Potential subjects who pass the phone screen portion will have the option to do the 
consenting screening portion remotely.  They will be sent two copies of the consent form and a 
release of information to review at their leisure through a method that is most convenient for 
them (i.e., email, fax, or mail).  This way subjects have time to review the consent prior to 
signing and they have their own copy to follow along and ask questions during the consenting 
phone call. If they agree to participate, subjects can keep one copy of the consent and hand-sign, 
date, and return the other copy along with a signed released of information back to our research 
office either by fax, email, or mail in a prepaid envelope. When the consent is also signed by a 
member of the research team, it will be filed in the subject’s research record.  Using tele-health 
platforms (i.e., Zoom) the researcher and subject will thoroughly review and sign the consent 
form, complete a structured clinical interview (SCID) by a member of the research team, and a 
medical history and psychiatric interview by a study physician.  This will take up to two hours to 
complete in total.  If deemed eligible by initial Zoom call and interviews, potential subjects will 
be asked to complete the rest of the study procedures as detailed in the protocol.
10. Evaluation of Subject(s) Capacity to Provide Informed Consent/Assent: Indicate how the 
personnel obtaining consent will assess the potential subject’s ability and capacity to consent to the 
research being proposed. 
We do not plan to recruit subjects with limited decision-making capacity. Potential subjects will 
undergo a phone interview and a face-to-face interview. At that time, the person obtaining 
consent will meet the study subject, review the informed consent form, explain the purpose of 
the study and risks associated with participation, and will be available for questions. Study staff 
is trained to assess the subject’s understanding of pertinent information given to them and 
whether or not subjects can appreciate the implications of their decision.  To ensure that the 
study subject understands the study, the subject will be asked questions about the study 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 46 of 59
procedures and the risks associated with participation. If any concern arises that the study subject 
did not fully understand the study, the person obtaining consent may decide that the subject is 
not suitable for participation. This process generally takes about 1 hour. If the subject is still 
interested, after all questions have been answered, the person obtaining consent will ask the 
subject to sign the informed consent form.
11. Documentation of Consent/Assent: Specify the documents that will be used during the 
consent/assent process. Copies of all documents should be appended to the protocol, in the same 
format that they will be given to subjects. 
Compound consent and authorization form.
Process of consent form, evaluation of subject’s capacity to provide informed consent, and 
documentation of consent will be the same for ADHD subjects. 
12. Non-English Speaking Subjects: Explain provisions in place to ensure comprehension for 
research involving non-English speaking subjects. If enrollment of these subjects is anticipated, 
translated copies of all consent materials must be submitted for approval prior to use. 
Non-English speaking healthy subjects nor ADHD subjects will not be enrolled in this study.
12(a) As a limited alternative to the above requirement, will you use the short form* for 
consenting process if you unexpectedly encounter a non-English speaking individual interested 
in study participation and the translation of the long form is not possible prior to intended 
enrollment? 
YES ☐  NO ☐
Note* If more than 2 study participants are enrolled using a short form translated into the same 
language, then the full consent form should be translated into that language for use the next time 
a subject speaking that language is to be enrolled.
Several translated short form templates are found on our website 
at:  http://www.yale.edu/hrpp/forms-templates/biomedical.html. If the translation of the short 
form is not available on our website, then the translated short form needs to be submitted to the 
IRB office for approval via amendment prior to enrolling the subject. Please review the 
guidance and presentation on use of the short form available on the HRPP website.
If using a short form without a translated HIPAA Research Authorization Form, please 
request a HIPAA waiver in the section above. 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 47 of 59
13. Consent Waiver: In certain circumstances, the HIC may grant a waiver of signed consent, or 
a full waiver of consent, depending on the study. If you will request either a waiver of consent, 
or a waiver of signed consent for this study, complete the appropriate section below.  
 
   Not Requesting a consent waiver 
 
  Requesting a waiver of signed consent
       
 Requesting a full waiver of consent
   
A. Waiver of signed consent: (Verbal consent from subjects will be obtained. If PHI is 
collected, information in this section must match Section VII, Question 6)
X Requesting a waiver of signed consent for Recruitment/Screening only 
If requesting a waiver of signed consent, please address the following:
a. Would the signed consent form be the only record linking the subject and the research?  
 Yes  
 No
b. Does a breach of confidentiality constitute the principal risk to subjects? 
 Yes 
 No
OR
c. Does the research activity pose greater than minimal risk? 
 Yes If you answered yes, stop. A waiver cannot be granted.  Please note: 
Recruitment/screening is generally a minimal risk research activity  
 No 
AND
d. Does the research include any activities that would require signed consent in a non-
research context? 
 Yes  
 No
 Requesting a waiver of signed consent for the Entire Study (Note that an information 
sheet may be required.)
If requesting a waiver of signed consent, please address the following:
a. Would the signed consent form be the only record linking the subject and the research? 
 Yes  
 No
b. Does a breach of confidentiality constitute the principal risk to subjects? 
 Yes  
 No
OR
c. Does the research pose greater than minimal risk? 
 Yes If you answered yes, stop. A 
waiver cannot be granted.    
 No 
AND
d. Does the research include any activities that would require signed consent in a non-
research context? 
 Yes  
 No
B. Full waiver of consent: (No consent from subjects will be obtained for the activity.) 
 Requesting a waiver of consent for Recruitment/Screening only 
a. Does the research activity pose greater than minimal risk to subjects?  
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 48 of 59
 Yes  If you answered yes, stop. A waiver cannot be granted. Please note: 
Recruitment/screening is generally a minimal risk research activity 
 No
b. Will the waiver adversely affect subjects’ rights and welfare? 
 Yes  
 No
c. Why would the research be impracticable to conduct without the waiver? 
d. Where appropriate, how will pertinent information be returned to, or shared with 
subjects at a later date? 
 Requesting a full waiver of consent for the Entire Study (Note: If PHI is 
collected, information here must match Section VII, question 6.)
If requesting a full waiver of consent, please address the following:
a. Does the research pose greater than minimal risk to subjects?  
 Yes  If you answered yes, stop. A waiver cannot be granted.  
 No
b. Will the waiver adversely affect subjects’ rights and welfare? 
 Yes  
 No
c. Why would the research be impracticable to conduct without the waiver? 
d. Where appropriate, how will pertinent information be returned to, or shared with 
subjects at a later date? 
SECTION VIII: PROTECTION OF RESEARCH SUBJECTS
    Confidentiality & Security of Data:
a.    What protected health information (medical information along with the HIPAA identifiers) 
about subjects will be collected and used for the research?   
Subjects who decide to participate in the study will have a medical record at the Connecticut 
Mental Health Center (CMHC). If subjects already have a medical record at CMHC, some 
information about their participation in the study will be included here. If they do not have a 
medical record at CMHC, one will be made for their visit. The information that will be entered 
into this medical record will include: name, date of birth, dates of workup in CMHC/scan at the 
PET center, phone number, address, medical history, physical exams, electrocardiograms, and 
blood work. Subject’s name, date of birth, date of scans, and phone number will not be used in the 
analysis neither in the presentation of the results. Results of the MRI/PET scans, results from 
computerized assessments, and results from paper and pencil questionnaires will be stored on 
secure servers for purposes of data analysis.  
b. How will the research data be collected, recorded and stored? 
Research data will be collected over the phone, by paper and pencil questionnaires, by interviews, 
by neurocognitive assessments, by PET scanning, MR scanning, computerized assessments, and 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 49 of 59
laboratory work. This information will be recorded/transferred in each subject’s Case Report Form 
and on a password protected University computer servers that are kept in locked offices. 
c.    How will the digital data be stored? 
 CD  
 DVD  
 Flash Drive  
 Portable Hard   
       Drive  
  Secured Server  
  Laptop Computer  
 Desktop Computer  
 Other
d.    What methods and procedures will be used to safeguard the confidentiality and security of    
the identifiable study data and the storage media indicated above during and after the subject’s 
participation in the study?
All portable devices must contain encryption software, per University Policy 5100.  If 
there is a technical reason a device cannot be encrypted please submit an exception request 
to the Information Security, Policy and Compliance Office by clicking on url 
http://its.yale.edu/egrc  or email it.compliance@yale.edu 
         
All of the information obtained in this study is stored in locked files or password protected and 
encrypted computer files. The only ones who have access to this information are the medical 
personnel and the research staff at the CNRU or the Yale PET Center. 
Identifiable research data are stored on a secure database located on the internal PET Center 
Network. The PET network is protected by a Cisco PIX firewall operated by ITS. All research 
data are backed up nightly to a Dell PV-136T library wit 4 IBM Ultrium-TD2 tape drives using 
the backup software Legato Networker 7.3 from EMC. Human subjects enrolled in the study are 
assigned a subject-specific random identifier. Subject identifiers and the means to link the 
subject names and codes with the research data are stored in separate locations within the 
database. The software of the database limits the ability to connect the random identifier to the 
actual subject identification information to research team members only. Access to the database 
is password protected and each research team member is required to have a unique ID and 
password to gain access to the database. Authorized users employ their netid and authentication 
is performed using Yale’s central authentication server. Users always access research data 
through the random identifier only. Direct identifiers belonging to subjects who withdraw from 
the study, will be stripped from the key.
Results are published as group data without the use of characteristics that would identify 
individual subjects. We quote information only by number in conference discussions, scientific 
reports, or publications, in order to maintain anonymity.
Procedures to ensure confidentiality follow the policies of Yale School of Medicine.
Any identifiable information obtained in connection with this protocol remains confidential. It is 
disclosed only with the subject's prior authorization or as required by U.S. and State law. 
Information that we are legally required to disclose includes abuse of a child or elderly person, or 
certain reportable infectious disease.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 50 of 59
Information is discussed among research personnel within a clinical setting. Authorized 
representatives of the Yale Human Investigation Committee or the FDA may review records for 
auditing purpose.
If the subject provides written consent to release research information to an insurer, employer, or 
other person, then we may not withhold that information.
e.
What will be done with the data when the research is completed? Are there plans to destroy     
the identifiable data? If yes, describe how, by whom and when identifiers will be destroyed. If 
no, describe how the data and/or identifiers will be secured.
This information will be kept in a locked office during five years. Afterwards, identifying 
information will be discarded, but the other research data is kept indefinitely. Paper and electronic 
data will be destroyed by research assistants and study personnel at Yale University. Paper media 
will be destroyed by shredding and electronic media will be destroyed by zeroing, degaussing, or 
physical destroying as applied to the medium. De-identified MRI/PET imaging data will be kept 
for a minimum of 7 years. 
f.   Who will have access to the protected health information (such as the research sponsor, the  
investigator, the research staff, all research monitors, FDA, Yale Cancer Center Data and Safety 
Monitoring Committee (DSMC), SSC, etc.)? (please distinguish between PHI and de-identified 
data) 
The research staff at Yale University will have access to PHI. The research Sponsor and the HIC 
could have access to de-identified data. The HIC can have access to identified data for auditing 
purposes.
g.   If appropriate, has a Certificate of Confidentiality been obtained?  A Certificate of 
Confidentiality for this study has been provided through the NIH.
h.   Are any of the study procedures likely to yield information subject to mandatory reporting   
requirements? (e.g., HIV testing – reporting of communicable diseases; parent interview -incidents 
of child abuse, elderly abuse, etc.). Please verify to whom such instances will need to be reported. 
In the case that elder or child abuse is discovered this will be reported to Connecticut Department 
of Social Services; Protective Services for the Elderly and/or The Child Abuse and Neglect Care 
line. 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 51 of 59
SECTION IX: POTENTIAL BENEFITS
Potential Benefits: Identify any benefits that may be reasonably expected to result from the 
research, either to the subject(s) or to society at large. (Payment of subjects is not considered a 
benefit in this context of the risk benefit assessment.) 
Subjects will receive a thorough medical / psychiatric evaluation at no cost to themselves, as well 
as benefit from the knowledge that their participation in such studies may help others in the future 
by identifying the neurochemical basis of calcitriol function in brain, and pointing to potential 
augmentation strategies for the treatment of ADHD. Otherwise, there are no direct benefits to 
individuals participating in this research. Expanding the current understanding on neurocognitive 
effects of vitamin D use could benefit society, and consequently better methods of treatment could 
be designed. 
         SECTION X: RESEARCH ALTERNATIVES AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
1.     Alternatives: What other alternatives are available to the study subjects outside of the research?
Participants can choose not to participate in this research study. 
2. Payments for Participation (Economic Considerations): Describe any payments that 
will be made to subjects, the amount and schedule of payments, and the conditions for 
receiving this compensation. 
         Subjects will be paid $25 for completion of the screening visit, $200 for completion of each 
[11C]-PHNO scan ($800 total), $25 for the completion of the structural MRI, $25 for completion 
of the first follow up visit, and $25 upon completion of the second follow up visit for a total 
compensation of up to $900.  In the event that a PET scan day is cancelled for reasons outside of 
your control, you will receive a minimum payment of $50 per cancelled scan.
ADHD inpatient subjects will have a $500 bonus for completion of inpatient study procedures 
thus their total compensation could be up to $1,400.
Participants will be paid $20 by referring a potential participant who enrolls in the study (i.e., 
passes telephone screening and signs consent forms). The referral fee will be provided once the 
referred participant enrolls in the study. In order to enroll, the referred participant will call the 
study team instead of study team taking this initiative. 
Payments will be made in loadable increments after completing individual study procedures via a 
Bank of America debit card that will be mailed to subjects after completing the screening 
process.  
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 52 of 59
3. Costs for Participation (Economic Considerations): Clearly describe the subject’s costs 
associated with participation in the research, and the interventions or procedures of the 
study that will be provided at no cost to subjects. 
Subjects will incur no costs for participation in this research outside of potential costs for parking 
or transportation that may be reimbursed. 
In addition, on full-day study sessions for PET scanning, the participant will either be provided or 
reimbursed for a meal or snacks within twenty dollars and with a receipt. 
4.
In Case of Injury: This section is required for any research involving more than minimal risk, 
and for minimal risk research that presents the potential for physical harm (e.g., research 
involving blood draws).
. 
a.     Will medical treatment be available if research-related injury occurs? 
b.     Where and from whom may treatment be obtained? 
c.     Are there any limits to the treatment being provided? 
d.     Who will pay for this treatment? 
e.     How will the medical treatment be accessed by subjects? 
Subjects will be assisted by research staff in obtaining medical care through information and/or 
referral if injury occurs during their participation in this study. Subjects will be responsible for the 
cost of any medical care required. 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 53 of 59
References:
Arns, M., J. M. Swanson and L. E. Arnold (2015). "ADHD Prevalence: Altitude or Sunlight? 
Better Understanding the Interrelations of Dopamine and the Circadian System." J Atten Disord.
Arns, M., K. B. van der Heijden, L. E. Arnold and J. L. Kenemans (2013). "Geographic variation 
in the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the sunny perspective." Biol 
Psychiatry 74(8): 585-590.
Barkley, R. A., K. R. Murphy, G. I. Dupaul and T. Bush (2002). "Driving in young adults with 
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: knowledge, performance, adverse outcomes, and the role 
of executive functioning." J Int Neuropsychol Soc 8(5): 655-672.
Beer, T. M., K. M. Eilers, M. Garzotto, M. J. Egorin, B. A. Lowe and W. D. Henner (2003). 
"Weekly high-dose calcitriol and docetaxel in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer." 
J Clin Oncol 21(1): 123-128.
Beer, T. M., M. M. Javle, C. W. Ryan, M. Garzotto, G. N. Lam, A. Wong, W. D. Henner, C. S. 
Johnson and D. L. Trump (2007). "Phase I study of weekly DN-101, a new formulation of 
calcitriol, in patients with cancer." Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59(5): 581-587.
Beer, T. M., D. Lemmon, B. A. Lowe and W. D. Henner (2003). "High-dose weekly oral 
calcitriol in patients with a rising PSA after prostatectomy or radiation for prostate carcinoma." 
Cancer 97(5): 1217-1224.
Beer, T. M., M. Munar and W. D. Henner (2001). "A Phase I trial of pulse calcitriol in patients 
with refractory malignancies: pulse dosing permits substantial dose escalation." Cancer 91(12): 
2431-2439.
Beer, T. M., C. W. Ryan, P. M. Venner, D. P. Petrylak, G. S. Chatta, J. D. Ruether, C. H. 
Redfern, L. Fehrenbacher, M. N. Saleh, D. M. Waterhouse, M. A. Carducci, D. Vicario, R. 
Dreicer, C. S. Higano, F. R. Ahmann, K. N. Chi, W. D. Henner, A. Arroyo, F. W. Clow and A. 
Investigators (2007). "Double-blinded randomized study of high-dose calcitriol plus docetaxel 
compared with placebo plus docetaxel in androgen-independent prostate cancer: a report from 
the ASCENT Investigators." J Clin Oncol 25(6): 669-674.
Bianchi, M. L., G. L. Ardissino, C. P. Schmitt, V. Dacco, L. Barletta, A. Claris-Appiani and O. 
Mehls (1999). "No difference in intestinal strontium absorption after an oral or an intravenous 
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 54 of 59
1,25(OH)2D3 bolus in normal subjects. For the European Study Group on Vitamin D in children 
with renal failure." J Bone Miner Res 14(10): 1789-1795.
Biederman, J., S. V. Faraone, T. Spencer, T. Wilens, D. Norman, K. A. Lapey, E. Mick, B. K. 
Lehman and A. Doyle (1993). "Patterns of psychiatric comorbidity, cognition, and psychosocial 
functioning in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder." Am J Psychiatry 150(12): 
1792-1798.
Biederman, J., C. R. Petty, R. Fried, R. Kaiser, C. R. Dolan, S. Schoenfeld, A. E. Doyle, L. J. 
Seidman and S. V. Faraone (2008). "Educational and occupational underattainment in adults 
with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a controlled study." J Clin Psychiatry 69(8): 1217-
1222.
Boscato, L. M. and M. C. Stuart (1988). "Heterophilic antibodies: a problem for all 
immunoassays." Clin Chem 34(1): 27-33.
Boileau, I., Dagher, A., Leyton, M., Gunn, R. N., Baker, G. B., Diksic, M., & Benkelfat, C. 
(2006). Modeling sensitization to stimulants in humans: an [11C]raclopride/positron emission 
tomography study in healthy men. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 63(12), 1386-1395. doi: 
10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1386
Bouillon, R., G. Carmeliet, L. Verlinden, E. van Etten, A. Verstuyf, H. F. Luderer, L. Lieben, C. 
Mathieu and M. Demay (2008). "Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor 
null mice." Endocr Rev 29(6): 726-776.
Brandi, L., M. Egfjord and K. Olgaard (2002). "Pharmacokinetics of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and 
1alpha(OH)D(3) in normal and uraemic men." Nephrol Dial Transplant 17(5): 829-842.
Brinkman, W. B., S. N. Sherman, A. R. Zmitrovich, M. O. Visscher, L. E. Crosby, K. J. Phelan 
and E. F. Donovan (2009). "Parental angst making and revisiting decisions about treatment of 
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder." Pediatrics 124(2): 580-589.
Broadus, A. E., S. B. Erickson, J. M. Gertner, K. Cooper and J. W. Dobbins (1984). "An 
experimental human model of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-mediated hypercalciuria." J Clin 
Endocrinol Metab 59(2): 202-206.
Buell, J. S. and B. Dawson-Hughes (2008). "Vitamin D and neurocognitive dysfunction: 
preventing "D"ecline?" Mol Aspects Med 29(6): 415-422.
Cardenas, L., S. Houle, S. Kapur and U. E. Busto (2004). "Oral D-amphetamine causes 
prolonged displacement of [11C]raclopride as measured by PET." Synapse 51(1): 27-31.
Cass, W. A., L. E. Peters, A. M. Fletcher and D. M. Yurek (2012). "Evoked dopamine overflow 
is augmented in the striatum of calcitriol treated rats." Neurochem Int 60(2): 186-191.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 55 of 59
Coleman, R. J., N. P. Quinn, M. Traub and C. D. Marsden (1990). "Nasogastric and intravenous 
infusions of (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine (PHNO) in Parkinson's disease." J Neurol 
Neurosurg Psychiatry 53(2): 102-105.
Cornblatt, B.A., et al., The Continuous Performance Test, identical pairs version (CPT-IP): I. 
New findings about sustained attention in normal families. Psychiatry Res, 1988. 26(2): p. 223-
38. 
Cui, X., M. Pelekanos, P. Y. Liu, T. H. Burne, J. J. McGrath and D. W. Eyles (2013). "The 
vitamin D receptor in dopamine neurons; its presence in human substantia nigra and its 
ontogenesis in rat midbrain." Neuroscience 236: 77-87.
Erickson, S. B., K. Cooper, A. E. Broadus, L. H. Smith, P. G. Werness, H. J. Binder and J. W. 
Dobbins (1984). "Oxalate absorption and postprandial urine supersaturation in an experimental 
human model of absorptive hypercalciuria." Clin Sci (Lond) 67(1): 131-138.
Frank MJ, Moustafa AA, Haughey HM, Curran T, Hutchison KE. Genetic triple dissociation 
reveals multiple roles for dopamine in reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the National 
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(41):16311-6. Epub 2007/10/05. 
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706111104. PubMed PMID: 17913879; PMCID: PMC2042203. 
Gallezot, J. D., J. D. Beaver, R. N. Gunn, N. Nabulsi, D. Weinzimmer, T. Singhal, M. Slifstein, 
K. Fowles, Y. S. Ding, Y. Huang, M. Laruelle, R. E. Carson and E. A. Rabiner (2012). "Affinity 
and selectivity of [(1)(1)C]-(+)-PHNO for the D3 and D2 receptors in the rhesus monkey brain in 
vivo." Synapse 66(6): 489-500.
Gallezot, J. D., M. Q. Zheng, K. Lim, S. F. Lin, D. Labaree, D. Matuskey, Y. Huang, Y. S. Ding, 
R. E. Carson and R. T. Malison (2014). "Parametric Imaging and Test-Retest Variability of 
(1)(1)C-(+)-PHNO Binding to D(2)/D(3) Dopamine Receptors in Humans on the High-
Resolution Research Tomograph PET Scanner." J Nucl Med 55(6): 960-966.
Ginovart, N., M. Willeit, P. Rusjan, A. Graff, P. Bloomfield, S. Houle, S. Kapur and A. Wilson 
(2007). "Positron emission tomography quantification of [11C]-(+)-PHNO binding in the human 
brain." J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 27(4): 857-871.
Gustafsson, P., L. Rylander, C. H. Lindh, B. A. Jonsson, A. Ode, P. Olofsson, S. A. Ivarsson, A. 
Rignell-Hydbom, N. Haglund and K. Kallen (2015). "Vitamin D Status at Birth and Future Risk 
of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)." PLoS One 10(10): e0140164.
Hamilton, C. M., L. C. Strader, J. G. Pratt, D. Maiese, T. Hendershot, R. K. Kwok, J. A. 
Hammond, W. Huggins, D. Jackman, H. Pan, D. S. Nettles, T. H. Beaty, L. A. Farrer, P. Kraft, 
M. L. Marazita, J. M. Ordovas, C. N. Pato, M. R. Spitz, D. Wagener, M. Williams, H. A. 
Junkins, W. R. Harlan, E. M. Ramos and J. Haines (2011). "The PhenX Toolkit: get the most 
from your measures." Am J Epidemiol 174(3): 253-260.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 56 of 59
Holick, M. F. (1995). "Environmental factors that influence the cutaneous production of vitamin 
D." Am J Clin Nutr 61(3 Suppl): 638s-645s.
Holick, M. F. (2007). "Vitamin D deficiency." N Engl J Med 357(3): 266-281.
Holick, M. F. (2009). "Vitamin D status: measurement, interpretation, and clinical application." 
Ann Epidemiol 19(2): 73-78.
Huber, R. S., T. S. Kim, N. Kim, M. D. Kuykendall, S. N. Sherwood, P. F. Renshaw and D. G. 
Kondo (2015). "Association Between Altitude and Regional Variation of ADHD in Youth." J 
Atten Disord.
Hussein, H., F. Ibrahim and P. Boudou (2015). "Evaluation of a new automated assay for the 
measurement of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in daily practice." Clin Biochem 
48(16-17): 1160-1162.
Klein, R. G., S. Mannuzza, M. A. Olazagasti, E. Roizen, J. A. Hutchison, E. C. Lashua and F. X. 
Castellanos (2012). "Clinical and functional outcome of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity 
disorder 33 years later." Arch Gen Psychiatry 69(12): 1295-1303.
Kooij, S. J., S. Bejerot, A. Blackwell, H. Caci, M. Casas-Brugue, P. J. Carpentier, D. Edvinsson, 
J. Fayyad, K. Foeken, M. Fitzgerald, V. Gaillac, Y. Ginsberg, C. Henry, J. Krause, M. B. 
Lensing, I. Manor, H. Niederhofer, C. Nunes-Filipe, M. D. Ohlmeier, P. Oswald, S. Pallanti, A. 
Pehlivanidis, J. A. Ramos-Quiroga, M. Rastam, D. Ryffel-Rawak, S. Stes and P. Asherson 
(2010). "European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: The 
European Network Adult ADHD." BMC Psychiatry 10: 67.
Mizrahi, R., S. Houle, I. Vitcu, A. Ng and A. A. Wilson (2010). "Side effects profile in humans 
of (11)C-(+)-PHNO, a dopamine D(2/3) agonist ligand for PET." J Nucl Med 51(3): 496-497.
Morales, E., J. Julvez, M. Torrent, F. Ballester, C. L. Rodriguez-Bernal, A. Andiarena, O. Vegas, 
A. M. Castilla, C. Rodriguez-Dehli, A. Tardon and J. Sunyer (2015). "Vitamin D in Pregnancy 
and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-like Symptoms in Childhood." Epidemiology 
26(4): 458-465.
Morean, M. E., H. de Wit, A. C. King, M. Sofuoglu, S. Y. Rueger and S. S. O'Malley (2013). 
"The drug effects questionnaire: psychometric support across three drug types." 
Psychopharmacology (Berl) 227(1): 177-192.
MTA (1999). "A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The MTA Cooperative Group. Multimodal Treatment Study of 
Children with ADHD." Arch Gen Psychiatry 56(12): 1073-1086.
Need, A. G., M. Horowitz, H. A. Morris and B. C. Nordin (2000). "Vitamin D status: effects on 
parathyroid hormone and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D in postmenopausal women." Am J Clin Nutr 
71(6): 1577-1581.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 57 of 59
Need, A. G., P. D. O'Loughlin, H. A. Morris, P. S. Coates, M. Horowitz and B. E. Nordin 
(2008). "Vitamin D metabolites and calcium absorption in severe vitamin D deficiency." J Bone 
Miner Res 23(11): 1859-1863.
Ramnath, N., S. Daignault-Newton, G. K. Dy, J. R. Muindi, A. Adjei, V. L. Elingrod, G. P. 
Kalemkerian, K. B. Cease, P. J. Stella, D. E. Brenner, S. Troeschel, C. S. Johnson and D. L. 
Trump (2013). "A phase I/II pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic study of calcitriol in 
combination with cisplatin and docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer." Cancer 
Chemother Pharmacol 71(5): 1173-1182.
Rapisarda, A., et al., The continuous performance test, identical pairs: norms, reliability and 
performance in healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia in Singapore. Schizophr Res, 
2014. 156(2-3): p. 233-40. 
Rucklidge, J. J., C. M. Frampton, B. Gorman and A. Boggis (2014). "Vitamin-mineral treatment 
of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: double-blind randomised placebo-controlled 
trial." Br J Psychiatry 204: 306-315.
Rucklidge, J. J., J. Johnstone, B. Gorman, A. Boggis and C. M. Frampton (2014). "Moderators of 
treatment response in adults with ADHD treated with a vitamin-mineral supplement." Prog 
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 50: 163-171.
Sempos, C. T., H. W. Vesper, K. W. Phinney, L. M. Thienpont, P. M. Coates and D. S. P. 
Vitamin (2012). "Vitamin D status as an international issue: national surveys and the problem of 
standardization." Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 243: 32-40.
Shotbolt, P., A. C. Tziortzi, G. E. Searle, A. Colasanti, J. van der Aart, S. Abanades, C. Plisson, 
S. R. Miller, M. Huiban, J. D. Beaver, R. N. Gunn, M. Laruelle and E. A. Rabiner (2012). 
"Within-subject comparison of [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO and [(11)C]raclopride sensitivity to acute 
amphetamine challenge in healthy humans." J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32(1): 127-136.
Slama, H., P. Fery, D. Verheulpen, N. Vanzeveren and P. Van Bogaert (2015). "Cognitive 
Improvement of Attention and Inhibition in the Late Afternoon in Children With Attention-
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Treated With Osmotic-Release Oral System 
Methylphenidate." J Child Neurol 30(8): 1000-1009.
Skosnik PD, Edwards CR, O'Donnell BF, Steffen A, Steinmetz JE, Hetrick WP. (2007) Cannabis 
use disrupts eyeblink conditioning: evidence for cannabinoid modulation of cerebellar-dependent 
learning. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of 
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(6):1432-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301506. PubMed PMID: 
17637608; PMCID: PMC2871697.
Solanto, M. V. (1998). "Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in 
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration." Behav Brain Res 94(1): 127-
152.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 58 of 59
Strom, M., T. I. Halldorsson, S. Hansen, C. Granstrom, E. Maslova, S. B. Petersen, A. S. Cohen 
and S. F. Olsen (2014). "Vitamin D measured in maternal serum and offspring 
neurodevelopmental outcomes: a prospective study with long-term follow-up." Ann Nutr Metab 
64(3-4): 254-261.
Stumpf, W. E., M. Sar, F. A. Reid, Y. Tanaka and H. F. DeLuca (1979). "Target cells for 1,25-
dihydroxyvitamin D3 in intestinal tract, stomach, kidney, skin, pituitary, and parathyroid." 
Science 206(4423): 1188-1190.
Taylor JR, Elsworth JD, Lawrence MS, Sladek JR, Jr., Roth RH, Redmond DE, Jr. Spontaneous 
blink rates correlate with dopamine levels in the caudate nucleus of MPTP-treated monkeys. Exp 
Neurol. 1999;158(1):214-20. Epub 1999/08/17. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1999.7093. PubMed PMID: 
10448434. 
Thienpont, L. M., H. C. Stepman and H. W. Vesper (2012). "Standardization of measurements of 
25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and D2." Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 243: 41-49.
Van Kammen, D. P. and D. L. Murphy (1975). "Attenuation of the euphoriant and activating 
effects of d- and l-amphetamine by lithium carbonate treatment." Psychopharmacologia 44(3): 
215-224.
Volkow, N. D., G. J. Wang, J. S. Fowler, S. J. Gatley, J. Logan, Y. S. Ding, R. Hitzemann and N. 
Pappas (1998). "Dopamine transporter occupancies in the human brain induced by therapeutic 
doses of oral methylphenidate." Am J Psychiatry 155(10): 1325-1331.
Volkow, N. D., G. J. Wang, J. S. Fowler, F. Telang, L. Maynard, J. Logan, S. J. Gatley, N. 
Pappas, C. Wong, P. Vaska, W. Zhu and J. M. Swanson (2004). "Evidence that methylphenidate 
enhances the saliency of a mathematical task by increasing dopamine in the human brain." Am J 
Psychiatry 161(7): 1173-1180.
Volkow, N. D., G. J. Wang, J. Newcorn, F. Telang, M. V. Solanto, J. S. Fowler, J. Logan, Y. Ma, 
K. Schulz, K. Pradhan, C. Wong and J. M. Swanson (2007). "Depressed dopamine activity in 
caudate and preliminary evidence of limbic involvement in adults with attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder." Arch Gen Psychiatry 64(8): 932-940.
Wilens, T. E., L. A. Adler, J. Adams, S. Sgambati, J. Rotrosen, R. Sawtelle, L. Utzinger and S. 
Fusillo (2008). "Misuse and diversion of stimulants prescribed for ADHD: a systematic review 
of the literature." J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47(1): 21-31.
Wilens, T. E. and W. Dodson (2004). "A clinical perspective of attention-deficit/hyperactivity 
disorder into adulthood." J Clin Psychiatry 65(10): 1301-1313.
Wilens, T. E., S. V. Faraone and J. Biederman (2004). "Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 
in adults." JAMA 292(5): 619-623.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023

APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023
Page 59 of 59
Willeit, M., N. Ginovart, S. Kapur, S. Houle, D. Hussey, P. Seeman and A. A. Wilson (2006). 
"High-affinity states of human brain dopamine D2/3 receptors imaged by the agonist [11C]-(+)-
PHNO." Biol Psychiatry 59(5): 389-394.
Zehnder, D. and M. Hewison (1999). "The renal function of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1alpha-
hydroxylase." Mol Cell Endocrinol 151(1-2): 213-220.
APPROVED BY THE YALE UNIVERSITY IRB 11/1/2023