A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of REGN5069 in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Pain
Sponsor: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 1 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
EudraCT: 2018-004730-15 
IND: 141725 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
Clinical Study Protocol 
A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTI-DOSE, 
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY 
AND SAFETY OF REGN5069 IN PATIENTS WITH PAIN DUE TO 
OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE 
 
 
Compound: 
REGN5069 
 
 
Clinical Phase: 
2 
 
 
Protocol Number: 
R5069-OA-1849 
 
 
Protocol Version: 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
 
 
Amendment 1 Date of Issue:  
See appended electronic signature page 
Original Date of Issue:  
30 Jan 2019 
 
 
Medical/Study Director: 
 
 Early Clinical 
Development and Experimental Sciences 
 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
777 Old Saw Mill River Road 
Tarrytown, NY 10591 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00
NCT03956550 

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 2 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
AMENDMENT HISTORY 
Amendment 1 
The purpose of this amendment is to add an end-of-study phone call to collect long-term 
information on patient status regarding joint replacement surgery beyond the current planned 
follow-up period, per health authority feedback, and to extend the required duration for serious 
adverse event (SAE) reporting, pregnancy reporting, and the use of contraceptive measures. 
Changes were also made to the statistical analysis plan based on health authority feedback. The 
following table outlines the changes made to the protocol and the rationale.  
Change and Rationale 
Sections Changed 
An end-of-study phone call will be conducted approximately 52 
weeks after the first dose of study drug to collect long-term 
information on patient status regarding joint replacement 
surgery (ie, whether the patient underwent, is scheduled for, or 
is on a waiting list to receive joint replacement surgery, or 
whether joint replacement was recommended but the patient 
elected to defer). This change was made per health authority 
feedback.  
As a result of this change, the study duration, end of study 
definition, and any prior reference to the “end of study” that 
now refers to the “end of the follow-up period” were updated 
for accuracy.  
Clinical Study Protocol Synopsis: Study 
Design; Study Duration; End of Study 
Definition; Procedures and Assessments 
Section 3.2.1 Rationale for Study Design 
Section 5.1 Study Description and Duration 
Figure 1: Study Flow Diagram 
Section 5.1.2 End of Study Definition 
Section 7.3.2 Study Drug Discontinuation 
Section 7.7 Concomitant Medications and 
Procedures 
Section 7.7.1 Prohibited Medications and 
Procedures 
Section 7.7.2 Permitted Mediations and 
Procedures 
Table 1: Schedule of Events 
Section 8.1.1 Footnotes for the Schedule of 
Events Table 1, #10 
Section 8.1.2 Footnotes for Schedule of 
Events for Follow-up of Patients Who 
Undergo Joint Replacement Surgery (Table 2) 
Section 8.2.3.8 End-of-Study Phone Call for 
Joint Replacement Status Questionnaire 
(added section) 
Section 9.4.1 Adverse Events 
Section 9.4.2 Serious Adverse Events 
The required duration for pregnancy reporting and the use of 
contraceptive measures for sexually active men and women of 
childbearing potential was extended from 7 months to at least 9 
months after the last dose of study drug. The duration for SAE 
reporting in the event that the investigator is informed of an 
SAE after a patient terminates early from the study was 
increased from onset of the SAE “within 169 days of last study 
drug administration” to “within 226 days of last study drug 
administration.” These changes were based on recently analyzed 
clinical pharmacology data from the ongoing first-in-human 
study R5069-HV-1810.  
Section 6.2.2 Exclusion Criteria, #28 and #31 
Section 9.4.2 Serious Adverse Events 
Section 9.4.3 Other Events that Require 
Accelerated Reporting to Sponsor 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 3 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Details on the planned analyses of X-ray and magnetic 
resonance imaging data were added, per health authority 
feedback.  
Section 8.2.3.6 Imaging 
Section 10.4.4.2 Other Safety, added 
“Imaging” in this analysis subsection 
The primary efficacy analysis plan was updated to reflect that 
change from baseline to week 12 in the Western Ontario and 
McMaster Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale will be a multiple 
imputation approach with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) 
based on the full analysis set with adjustment for missing data 
using a pattern mixture approach. Additionally, information was 
provided regarding the plan for handling missing data. These 
changes were made per health authority feedback.  
Clinical Study Protocol Synopsis: Statistical 
Plan, Primary Efficacy Analysis 
Section 10.4.3.1 Primary Efficacy Analysis 
The protocol language was modified to remove flexibility for 
dosing of REGN5069. Previously, the low dose of REGN5069 
was estimated to be 100 mg IV every 4 weeks (Q4W) and the 
high dose of REGN5069 was estimated to be 1000 mg IV Q4W. 
Flexibility was built in such that the high dose may have been 
adjusted downward and such that the low dose may have been 
adjusted downward or upward. The REGN5069 100 mg IV 
Q4W and REGN5069 1000 mg IV Q4W doses are the 2 doses 
that will be administered in this study.  
Clinical Study Protocol Synopsis: Study 
Design 
Section 3.2.2 Rationale for Dose Selection 
Section 5.1 Study Description and Duration 
Section 7.1 Investigational Treatments 
Section 7.5 Method of Treatment Assignment 
Genicular nerve block and any similar procedures are now listed 
as prohibited within 3 months of the screening visit to qualify 
for study participation and are prohibited up to the last study site 
visit in the follow-up period. Use of such procedures may 
interfere with pain perception.  
Section 6.2.2 Exclusion Criteria, #32 (added) 
Section 7.7.1 Prohibited Medications and 
Procedures 
The section entitled “Reasons for Temporary Discontinuation of 
Study Drug” was removed, as any discontinuation from study 
drug dosing will be permanent.  
Section 7.3.2.2 Reasons for Temporary 
Discontinuation of Study Drug (deleted 
section) 
Section 6.3 Premature Withdrawal from the 
Study 
To provide guidance to study sites, language was added to state 
that patients with a history of hypothyroidism must have 
thyroid-stimulating hormone levels measured and must be in an 
euthyroid state to be eligible for study participation.  
Section 6.2.2 Exclusion Criteria, #1 
The specific value for follicle-stimulating hormone levels to fall 
in the postmenopausal range was removed for flexibility.  
Section 6.2.2 Exclusion Criteria, #31 
All drug and alcohol testing will be performed with urine 
samples which are sufficient for this test based on central 
laboratory feedback. Thus, any serum sample collection 
previously specified for drug and alcohol testing was changed to 
urine sample collection and instructions in the event of a 
positive drug and/or alcohol test result were updated.  
Section 8.1 Schedule of Events, Table 1 
Schedule of Events 
Section 8.1.1 Footnotes for the Schedule of 
Events Table 1, #11 
Section 8.2.3.10 Laboratory Testing 
Specific statements regarding where laboratory samples will be 
processed were removed to allow flexibility.  
Section 8.2.3.10 Laboratory Testing 
Updated information regarding the first-in-human study 
R5069-HV-1810 based on the current status of the study. 
Section 1.1 Background 
Section 3.2.1 Rationale for Study Design 
Section 3.2.2 Rationale for Dose Selection 
Removed reference to “study reference manual,” as there is no 
study reference manual.  
Throughout the protocol. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 4 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Minor edits were made to improve clarity throughout the 
protocol. 
Clinical Study Protocol Synopsis: Statistical 
Plan, Justification of the Sample Size 
List of Abbreviations and Definitions of 
Terms 
Section 6.2.1 Inclusion Criteria, #12 
Section 6.2.2 Exclusion Criteria, #21, 23, 24 
Table 1: Schedule of Events 
Section 8.1.3 Early Termination Visit 
Section 8.2.6.1 Pharmacodynamic and 
Biomarker Research 
 
Section 9.3.2 Serious Adverse Event 
Section 10.2 Justification of Sample Size 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 5 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS 
Title 
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study to 
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of REGN5069 in Patients with Pain due to 
Osteoarthritis of the Knee 
Site Locations 
 
Principal Investigator(s) 
Multiple sites in the United States (US) and ex-US 
To be determined after 50% patient enrollment is completed  
Objectives 
Primary Objective 
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of REGN5069 
compared to placebo in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed 
osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee who have a history of inadequate joint pain 
relief or intolerance to current analgesic therapy.  
Secondary Objectives 
The secondary objectives of the study are: 
 
To characterize the concentrations of functional REGN5069 in 
serum over time when patients are treated for up to 12 weeks 
 
To assess the safety and tolerability of REGN5069 compared 
with placebo when patients are treated for up to 12 weeks 
 
To measure levels of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against 
REGN5069 
following 
multiple 
intravenous 
(IV) 
administrations 
Study Design 
This multicenter phase 2 study consists of a screening period of up to 
30 days, followed by a 12-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm, 
placebo-controlled treatment period, a 24-week follow-up period, and an 
end-of-study phone call approximately 52 weeks after the first dose of study 
drug. The purpose of the end-of-study phone call is to determine whether a 
patient underwent, is scheduled for, or is on a waiting list to receive joint 
replacement surgery, or whether joint replacement was recommended but the 
patient elected to defer. Up to approximately 240 patients will be 
randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a low dose of REGN5069 at 100 mg 
IV every 4 weeks (Q4W), and a high dose of REGN5069 at 1000 mg IV 
Q4W, or matching placebo Q4W. The index knee joint is defined as the knee 
joint affected by OA and selected for primary assessment for this study. 
Randomization will be stratified by Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) category (2-3 
vs 4) of the index knee joint at the screening visit and participation in the 
Moticon sub-study (yes vs no).  
Study Duration 
Each patient will be enrolled in the study for approximately 56 weeks, 
including the screening period and the period up to the end-of-study phone 
call. 
End of Study Definition 
The end of study is defined as the date when the last patient completes the 
last phone call, withdraws from the study, or is lost to follow-up (ie, the 
patient can no longer be contacted by the investigator). 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 6 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Population 
 
 
Sample Size: 
Up to approximately 240 patients are planned for enrollment in this study. 
 
Target Population: 
Men and women who are at least 40 years of age at the time of study entry 
with a clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee based on the American College 
of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2) at 
the index knee joint. 
Treatments 
 
 
Study Drug 
 
Dose/Route/Schedule: 
REGN5069 or matching placebo.  
100 mg IV Q4W or 1000 mg IV Q4W or Placebo IV Q4W 
 
Rescue Treatment 
 
Dose/Route/Schedule: 
Starting at the screening visit until after the week-24 study visit is 
completed, acetaminophen is the only study-permitted rescue medication. 
Acetaminophen tablets of selected brand and strength will be provided to 
patients by the study site for use as rescue medication for breakthrough OA 
pain. In advance of initiating the study, each study site must consult with the 
sponsor and select the brand and the strength of acetaminophen tablets that 
will be dispensed to patients as rescue medication. In the event that pain 
relief for OA pain is inadequate, patients will take acetaminophen, as 
needed, in accordance with the instructions provided with the medication by 
each study site, with a maximum of 3000 mg/day. The use of rescue 
medication is not allowed for 48 hours prior to the start of or during a 
scheduled study visit to minimize the confounding effects of rescue 
medication on efficacy measures. 
Endpoints 
 
 
Primary: 
The primary endpoint of the study is the change from baseline to week 12 in 
the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain 
subscale score in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients 
treated with placebo. 
 
Secondary: 
The secondary efficacy endpoints of the study are: 
 
Change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC total score 
(based on the full survey) in patients treated with REGN5069 
compared to patients treated with placebo 
 
Change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC physical 
function subscale score in patients treated with REGN5069 
compared to patients treated with placebo 
 
Change from baseline to week 12 in the Patient Global 
Assessment score in patients treated with REGN5069 
compared to patients treated with placebo 
 
Change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC stiffness 
subscale score in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to 
patients treated with placebo 
 
Percentage of patients treated with REGN5069, compared to 
that of patients treated with placebo, who had a response at 
week 12, with response defined as an improvement by ≥30% in 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 7 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
the WOMAC pain subscale scores 
The secondary safety endpoints of the study are: 
 
The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in patients 
treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with 
placebo throughout the study duration 
 
The incidence of imaging abnormalities consistent with 
accelerated arthropathies as assessed by X-ray and magnetic 
resonance imaging in patients treated with REGN5069 
compared to patients treated with placebo throughout the study 
duration 
 
Presence of anti-REGN5069 antibody development in patients 
treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with 
placebo throughout the study duration 
Procedures and Assessments 
Efficacy 
Efficacy will be assessed through administration of the WOMAC full survey 
and subsections of the survey, and through administration of the Patient 
Global Assessment of OA.  
Safety 
Safety procedures include monitoring vital signs, orthostatic vital sign 
change, physical and neurological examinations, electrocardiograms, joint 
imaging, a joint pain questionnaire, drug concentration and ADA sample 
collections, and additional laboratory testing. An end-of-study phone call 
will be conducted approximately 52 weeks after the first dose of study drug 
to collect long-term information on patient status regarding joint replacement 
surgery (ie, whether the patient underwent, is scheduled for, or is on a 
waiting list to receive joint replacement surgery, or whether joint 
replacement was recommended but the patient elected to defer). 
Statistical Plan 
Statistical Hypotheses 
The null hypotheses of no treatment difference between a REGN5069 dose 
and placebo against an alternative hypothesis of some treatment difference in 
change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC pain subscale, physical 
function subscale, and Patient Global Assessment scores will be tested for 
each dose. Multiplicity adjustment for the 6 null hypotheses will be made 
using sequentially rejective multiple test procedure to control Type I error 
rate at 2-sided 0.05 level in the following order: 
 
H1: No treatment difference between 1000 mg REGN5069 and 
placebo groups in change from baseline to week 12 in 
WOMAC pain subscale score 
 
H2: No treatment difference between 100 mg REGN5069 and 
placebo groups in change from baseline to week 12 in 
WOMAC pain subscale score 
 
H3: No treatment difference between 1000 mg REGN5069 and 
placebo groups in change from baseline to week 12 in 
WOMAC physical function subscale score 
 
H4: No treatment difference between 100 mg REGN5069 and 
placebo groups in change from baseline to week 12 in 
WOMAC physical function subscale score 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 8 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
H5: No treatment difference between 1000 mg REGN5069 and 
placebo groups in change from baseline to week 12 in Patient 
Global Assessment score 
 
H6: No treatment difference between 100 mg REGN5069 and 
placebo groups in change from baseline to week 12 in Patient 
Global Assessment score 
If at any step a null hypothesis is not rejected, the testing will stop and no 
further hypothesis in the order will be tested. Further details will be provided 
in the Statistical Analysis Plan.  
Justification of the Sample Size 
Up to approximately 240 patients (80 per treatment group) will be 
randomized to 3 treatment groups in a 1:1:1 allocation. Assuming a standard 
deviation of 2.3, 80 patients per treatment group will provide approximately 
80% power to detect a treatment difference of 1.1 between the REGN5069 
dose and matching placebo in change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC 
pain subscale (using a significance level of 0.05, 2-sided t-test and assuming 
a dropout rate of 15% [6% due to lack of efficacy or adverse events, and 9% 
due to other reasons]). 
Primary Efficacy Analysis 
The primary estimand for the primary objective is the difference in means 
between both REGN5069 dose + protocol-defined rescue medication and 
placebo + protocol-defined rescue medication in the change from baseline to 
week 12 in the WOMAC pain subscale score of patients in the FAS.  All 
collected data will be included in the analysis regardless of whether 
prohibited medication was taken. Missing values will be imputed with the 
multiple imputation approach, where intermediate missing data will be first 
imputed using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method and then the 
remaining missing data with a monotone missing pattern will be imputed 
with a regression method. The regression model will adjust for treatment, 
randomization strata, and baseline score.  For patients who drop out due to 
lack of efficacy or adverse events, each imputed value will be further 
adjusted by subtracting the mean change from baseline to the respective 
post-baseline time point calculated from patients in the same treatment group 
with observed data at that time point.  For each complete dataset, the primary 
efficacy endpoint of change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC pain 
subscale score will be analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) 
model which will include treatment, randomization strata, and baseline score 
as covariate.  The least-squares means estimates as well as the difference of 
the estimates between each dose and placebo with standard error, p-values, 
and 95% confidence intervals will be provided by combining results from 
the 
analyses 
of 
the 
multiple 
imputed 
datasets 
using 
Rubin’s 
formulae.  Further details will be provided in the statistical analysis plan. 
Secondary Efficacy Analysis 
The continuous secondary endpoints will be analyzed similarly to the 
primary endpoint. For the analyses of categorical secondary endpoints, the 
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the K-L category (2-3 vs 4) will 
be used with missing data considered as non-response.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 9 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS 
Acetaminophen 
The United States Adopted Name for the International Nonproprietary Name 
paracetamol. Acetaminophen is the term used throughout this protocol.  
ADA 
Anti-drug antibody 
AE 
Adverse event 
AESI 
Adverse event of special interest 
ALT 
Alanine aminotransferase 
ANCOVA 
Analysis of covariance 
AST 
Aspartate aminotransferase 
AUC 
Area under the curve 
Bpm 
Beats per minute 
CFA 
Complete Freund’s adjuvant 
CGRP 
Calcitonin gene-related peptide 
CPK 
Creatine phosphokinase 
CRF 
Case report form (electronic or paper) 
CRO 
Contract research organization 
Ctrough 
Trough concentration 
EC 
Ethics Committee 
ECG 
Electrocardiogram 
EDC 
Electronic data capture 
ESR 
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate 
EU 
European Union 
FAS 
Full analysis set 
FIH 
First-in-human 
FSH 
Follicle-stimulating hormone 
GCP 
Good Clinical Practice 
GDNF 
Glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor 
GFRα3 
Glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor receptor alpha-3 
HbA1c 
Hemoglobin A1c; Glycated hemoglobin 
HIV 
Human immunodeficiency virus 
hsCRP 
High sensitivity C-reactive protein 
HV 
Healthy volunteer 
ICF 
Informed consent form 
ICH 
International Council for Harmonisation 
Index knee joint 
The knee joint affected by osteoarthritis and selected for primary assessment 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 10 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
INN 
International Nonproprietary Name 
IV 
Intravenous 
IWRS 
Interactive Web Response System 
K-L 
Kellgren-Lawrence 
MedDRA 
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 
MRI 
Magnetic resonance imaging 
NGF 
Neuronal growth factor 
NOAEL 
No-observed-adverse-effect level 
NSAID 
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug 
OA 
Osteoarthritis 
PCSV 
Potentially clinically significant value 
PD 
Pharmacodynamic 
PK 
Pharmacokinetic 
PPS 
Per protocol set 
PT 
Preferred term 
Q4W 
Every 4 weeks 
QRS 
Complex of Q, R, and S waves on an electrocardiogram 
RBC 
Red blood cell 
Regeneron 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
RET 
Receptor tyrosine kinase 
SAE 
Serious adverse event 
SAF 
Safety analysis set 
SAP 
Statistical analysis plan 
SAS 
Statistical Analysis System 
SC 
Subcutaneous 
SD 
Standard deviation 
SOC 
System organ class 
SUSAR 
Suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction 
TEAE 
Treatment-emergent adverse event 
TrkA 
Tropomyosin receptor kinase A 
TRPV1 
Transient receptor potential caption channel subfamily V member 1 
ULN 
Upper limit of normal 
US 
United States 
vs 
Versus 
WBC 
White blood cell 
WOCBP 
Women of childbearing potential 
WOMAC 
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 11 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
AMENDMENT HISTORY .............................................................................................................2 
CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS...............................................................................5 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS ..................................................9 
1. 
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................17 
1.1. 
Background .................................................................................................................17 
2. 
STUDY OBJECTIVES ..............................................................................................19 
2.1. 
Primary Objective .......................................................................................................19 
2.2. 
Secondary Objectives .................................................................................................19 
2.3. 
Exploratory Objectives ...............................................................................................19 
3. 
HYPOTHESIS AND RATIONALE ..........................................................................20 
3.1. 
Hypothesis ..................................................................................................................20 
3.2. 
Rationale .....................................................................................................................20 
3.2.1. 
Rationale for Study Design .........................................................................................20 
3.2.2. 
Rationale for Dose Selection ......................................................................................21 
3.3. 
Risk-Benefit ................................................................................................................22 
4. 
STUDY ENDPOINTS AND VARIABLES ...............................................................22 
4.1. 
Primary and Secondary Endpoints..............................................................................22 
4.1.1. 
Primary Endpoint ........................................................................................................22 
4.1.2. 
Secondary Endpoints ..................................................................................................22 
4.1.2.1. 
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints ....................................................................................22 
4.1.2.2. 
Secondary Safety Endpoints .......................................................................................22 
4.1.3. 
Exploratory Endpoints ................................................................................................23 
4.2. 
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics ................................................................23 
4.3. 
Pharmacokinetic Variables .........................................................................................23 
4.4. 
Immunogenicity Variables ..........................................................................................23 
5. 
STUDY DESIGN .......................................................................................................24 
5.1. 
Study Description and Duration .................................................................................24 
5.1.1. 
Study Stopping Rules .................................................................................................24 
5.1.2. 
End of Study Definition ..............................................................................................25 
5.2. 
Planned Interim Analysis ............................................................................................25 
5.3. 
Study Committees .......................................................................................................25 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 12 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
5.3.1. 
Independent Data Monitoring Committee ..................................................................25 
6. 
SELECTION, WITHDRAWAL, AND REPLACEMENT OF PATIENTS ..............25 
6.1. 
Number of Patients Planned .......................................................................................25 
6.2. 
Study Population .........................................................................................................25 
6.2.1. 
Inclusion Criteria ........................................................................................................25 
6.2.2. 
Exclusion Criteria .......................................................................................................26 
6.3. 
Premature Withdrawal from the Study .......................................................................30 
6.4. 
Replacement of Patients .............................................................................................30 
7. 
STUDY TREATMENTS............................................................................................30 
7.1. 
Investigational Treatments ..........................................................................................30 
7.2. 
Rescue Treatment .......................................................................................................30 
7.3. 
Dose Modification and Study Treatment Discontinuation Rules ...............................31 
7.3.1. 
Dose Modification ......................................................................................................31 
7.3.2. 
Study Drug Discontinuation .......................................................................................31 
7.3.2.1. 
Reasons for Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug .............................................31 
7.4. 
Management of Acute Reactions ................................................................................31 
7.4.1. 
Acute Intravenous Infusion Reactions ........................................................................31 
7.4.1.1. 
Interruption of the Intravenous Infusion .....................................................................31 
7.4.1.2. 
Termination of the Intravenous Infusion ....................................................................32 
7.5. 
Method of Treatment Assignment ..............................................................................33 
7.5.1. 
Blinding ......................................................................................................................33 
7.5.2. 
Emergency Unblinding ...............................................................................................33 
7.6. 
Treatment Logistics and Accountability .....................................................................34 
7.6.1. 
Packaging, Labeling, and Storage ..............................................................................34 
7.6.2. 
Supply and Disposition of Treatments .......................................................................34 
7.6.3. 
Treatment Accountability ...........................................................................................34 
7.6.4. 
Treatment Compliance ................................................................................................34 
7.7. 
Concomitant Medications and Procedures .................................................................34 
7.7.1. 
Prohibited Medications and Procedures .....................................................................35 
7.7.2. 
Permitted Medications and Procedures ......................................................................35 
8. 
STUDY SCHEDULE OF EVENTS AND PROCEDURES ......................................36 
8.1. 
Schedule of Events .....................................................................................................36 
8.1.1. 
Footnotes for the Schedule of Events Table 1 ............................................................40 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 13 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8.1.2. 
Footnotes for Schedule of Events for Follow-up Period of Patients Who 
Undergo Joint Replacement Surgery (Table 2) ..........................................................42 
8.1.3. 
Early Termination Visit ..............................................................................................42 
8.1.4. 
Unscheduled Visits .....................................................................................................42 
8.2. 
Study Procedures ........................................................................................................43 
8.2.1. 
Procedures Performed at the Screening/Baseline Visit ..............................................43 
8.2.1.1. 
Determination of Osteoarthritis of the Knee ..............................................................43 
8.2.1.2. 
Height .........................................................................................................................43 
8.2.1.3. 
Weight .........................................................................................................................43 
8.2.2. 
Efficacy Procedures ....................................................................................................44 
8.2.2.1. 
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index .................................................44 
8.2.2.2. 
Patient Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis ..............................................................44 
8.2.3. 
Safety Procedures .......................................................................................................44 
8.2.3.1. 
Vital Signs ..................................................................................................................44 
8.2.3.2. 
Orthostatic Vital Sign Assessment .............................................................................44 
8.2.3.3. 
Physical Examination with Joint Exam ......................................................................45 
8.2.3.4. 
Electrocardiogram .......................................................................................................45 
8.2.3.5. 
Neurological Examination ..........................................................................................45 
8.2.3.6. 
Imaging .......................................................................................................................45 
8.2.3.7. 
Joint Pain Questionnaire .............................................................................................46 
8.2.3.8. 
End-of-Study Phone Call for Joint Replacement Status Questionnaire .....................46 
8.2.3.9. 
Knee Society Score for Joint Replacement Follow-up Only ......................................46 
8.2.3.10. 
Laboratory Testing ......................................................................................................46 
8.2.4. 
Drug Concentration and Measurements .....................................................................48 
8.2.5. 
Anti-Drug Antibody Measurements and Samples ......................................................48 
8.2.6. 
Biomarker, Pharmacodynamic, 
and Other Research .................48 
8.2.6.1. 
Pharmacodynamic and Biomarker Research ..............................................................48 
 
 
 
 
8.2.6.4. 
Collection of Arthroplasty Tissue Samples (Joint Replacement Surgery 
Only) ...........................................................................................................................49 
8.2.6.5. 
Histological Evaluation of Tissue Samples (Joint Replacement Surgery 
Only) ...........................................................................................................................49 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 14 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8.2.6.6. 
Moticon Digital Insole Device Sub-Study for Gait Assessments ...............................49 
9. 
SAFETY DEFINITIONS, REPORTING, AND MONITORING .............................50 
9.1. 
Obligations of Investigator .........................................................................................50 
9.2. 
Obligations of Sponsor ...............................................................................................50 
9.3. 
Definitions ..................................................................................................................50 
9.3.1. 
Adverse Event .............................................................................................................50 
9.3.2. 
Serious Adverse Event ................................................................................................51 
9.3.3. 
Adverse Events of Special Interest .............................................................................51 
9.3.4. 
Infusion Reactions ......................................................................................................51 
9.4. 
Recording and Reporting Adverse Events ..................................................................52 
9.4.1. 
Adverse Events ...........................................................................................................52 
9.4.2. 
Serious Adverse Events ..............................................................................................52 
9.4.3. 
Other Events that Require Accelerated Reporting to Sponsor ...................................52 
9.4.4. 
Reporting Adverse Events Leading to Withdrawal from the Study ...........................53 
9.4.5. 
Abnormal Laboratory, Vital Signs, or Electrocardiogram Results .............................53 
9.4.6. 
Follow-up ....................................................................................................................53 
9.5. 
Evaluation of Severity and Causality .........................................................................53 
9.5.1. 
Evaluation of Severity ................................................................................................53 
9.5.2. 
Evaluation of Causality ...............................................................................................54 
9.6. 
Safety Monitoring .......................................................................................................56 
9.7. 
Investigator Alert Notification ....................................................................................56 
10. 
STATISTICAL PLAN................................................................................................56 
10.1. 
Statistical Hypothesis ..................................................................................................56 
10.2. 
Justification of Sample Size........................................................................................57 
10.3. 
Analysis Sets ...............................................................................................................57 
10.3.1. 
Efficacy Analysis Sets ................................................................................................57 
10.3.2. 
Safety Analysis Set .....................................................................................................57 
10.3.3. 
Per Protocol Set ..........................................................................................................57 
10.3.4. 
Pharmacokinetic Analysis Sets ...................................................................................58 
10.3.5. 
Anti-Drug Antibody Analysis Sets .............................................................................58 
10.4. 
Statistical Methods ......................................................................................................58 
10.4.1. 
Patient Disposition ......................................................................................................58 
10.4.2. 
Demography and Baseline Characteristics .................................................................58 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 15 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
10.4.3. 
Efficacy Analyses .......................................................................................................58 
10.4.3.1. 
Primary Efficacy Analysis ..........................................................................................58 
10.4.3.2. 
Secondary Efficacy Analysis ......................................................................................59 
10.4.4. 
Safety Analysis ...........................................................................................................59 
10.4.4.1. 
Adverse Events ...........................................................................................................59 
10.4.4.2. 
Other Safety ................................................................................................................60 
10.4.4.3. 
Treatment Exposure ....................................................................................................60 
10.4.4.4. 
Treatment Compliance ................................................................................................61 
10.4.5. 
Pharmacokinetics ........................................................................................................61 
10.4.5.1. 
Analysis of Drug Concentration Data .........................................................................61 
10.4.5.2. 
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Analyses ....................61 
10.4.6. 
Analysis of Anti-Drug Antibody Data ........................................................................61 
10.5. 
Interim Analysis ..........................................................................................................61 
10.6. 
Additional Statistical Data Handling Conventions .....................................................62 
10.7. 
Statistical Considerations Surrounding the Premature Termination of a Study .........62 
11. 
DATA MANAGEMENT AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS .....................................62 
11.1. 
Data Management .......................................................................................................62 
11.2. 
Electronic Systems ......................................................................................................63 
12. 
STUDY MONITORING ............................................................................................63 
12.1. 
Monitoring of Study Sites ...........................................................................................63 
12.2. 
Source Document Requirements ................................................................................63 
12.3. 
Case Report Form Requirements ................................................................................63 
13. 
AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS .................................................................................64 
14. 
ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS ..........................................64 
14.1. 
Good Clinical Practice Statement ...............................................................................64 
14.2. 
Informed Consent .......................................................................................................64 
14.3. 
Patients Confidentiality and Data Protection ..............................................................65 
14.4. 
Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee ...........................................................65 
14.5. 
Clinical Study Data Transparency ..............................................................................66 
15. 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS ..................................................................................66 
16. 
PREMATURE TERMINATION OF THE STUDY OR CLOSE-OUT OF A 
SITE ............................................................................................................................66 
16.1. 
Premature Termination of the Study ...........................................................................66 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 16 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
16.2. 
Close-out of a Site ......................................................................................................66 
17. 
STUDY DOCUMENTATION ...................................................................................67 
17.1. 
Certification of Accuracy of Data ...............................................................................67 
17.2. 
Retention of Records ..................................................................................................67 
18. 
DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE ..............................................................................67 
19. 
CONFIDENTIALITY ................................................................................................68 
20. 
FINANCING AND INSURANCE .............................................................................68 
21. 
PUBLICATION POLICY ..........................................................................................68 
22. 
REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................68 
23. 
INVESTIGATOR’S AGREEMENT ..........................................................................71 
SIGNATURE OF SPONSOR’S RESPONSIBLE OFFICERS .....................................................72 
 
LIST OF TABLES 
Table 1: 
Schedule of Events .....................................................................................................37 
Table 2: 
Schedule of Events for Follow-up Period of Patients Who Undergo Joint 
Replacement Surgery ..................................................................................................42 
 
LIST OF FIGURES 
Figure 1: 
Study Flow Diagram ...................................................................................................24 
 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 17 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
1. 
INTRODUCTION  
1.1. 
Background 
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent joint disease and a leading source of chronic pain and 
disability within the United States (US) (Murray, 2013) and other developed nations (Vos, 2012). 
Across the European Union (EU) Member States, OA prevalence has been reported to vary from 
2.8% in Romania to 18.3% in Hungary (Network EMCSaI, 2012). From 2013 to 2015 in the US, 
49.6% of adults age 65 years and older reported having a diagnosis of OA, and the prevalence 
continues to rise (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). As the world’s population 
continues to age, it is estimated that degenerative joint disease disorders such as OA will impact 
at least 130 million individuals around the globe by the year 2050 (Maiese, 2016).  
Knee OA accounts for over 80% of the disease total burden (Vos, 2012). Knee OA is estimated 
to affect at least 19% of American adults 45 years of age and older (Lawrence, 2008). Across 
Europe, a lifetime risk of knee OA is estimated to be 45% (Kingsbury, 2014). More than half of 
patients with symptomatic knee OA are younger than age 65 years and will live for at least 3 
decades after the initial diagnosis, making the burden of knee OA particularly large (Deshpande, 
2016). 
A wide variety of interventions have been evaluated for the management of pain due to OA, 
including: 1) non-pharmacological modalities (eg, education, exercise, and provision of walking 
aids); 2) pharmacological treatments, including acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory 
drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and other centrally-active drugs (such as antidepressants); and 
3) intra-articular injections of glucocorticoid and hyaluronan preparations and surgical 
treatments. Surgical treatments alone include a variety of approaches, such as knee aspiration 
and joint lavage, as well as osteotomy, knee fusion, and total joint replacement (Malfait, 2013) 
(Zhang, 2007). However, with the exception of radical surgical interventions, such as total joint 
replacement, the majority of patients do not receive adequate pain relief either because these 
approaches have suboptimal efficacy and/or because their use is limited by tolerability and 
toxicity. Non-pharmacological approaches are less efficacious than pharmacological treatments 
(Zhang, 2007). Among surgical treatments, reliable standardized effect size has been calculated 
for arthroscopic lavage and debridement, which were found to be no more effective than placebo 
(Zhang, 2007). The limitations of currently available analgesic therapies include a variety of 
adverse effects associated with each available treatment. Use of acetaminophen carries a risk of 
hepatic toxicity and of serious allergic reactions. Use of NSAIDs is associated with 
gastrointestinal bleeding and ulceration, cardiovascular events, and renal toxicity. Opioid agents 
are characterized by central nervous system depression, nausea, vomiting, and potential for 
abuse. Inadequate pain relief has a profound impact on the quality of life for patients with an 
associated great cost to society, including healthcare costs and loss of productivity. With the 
increasing number of OA patients, there is a growing unmet medical need for additional 
treatment options with improved pain relief and fewer associated side-effects. 
Glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) receptor alpha-3 (GFRα3) is 1 of at least 4 
members 
of 
the 
GDNF 
receptor 
alpha 
(GFRα) 
family. 
These 
receptors 
are 
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins expressed in the central and peripheral nervous 
systems and are involved in the sensitization of pain-sensing neurons known as nociceptors 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 18 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
(Naveilhan, 1998) (Worby, 1998) (Baloh, 1998a). Artemin, the only known ligand for GFRα3 
(Baloh, 1998b), is a member of the GDNF family of ligands, which also includes GDNF, 
neurturin, and persephin (Baudet, 2000). These secreted ligands signal through the single-pass 
membrane receptor tyrosine kinase (RET) by clustering it with a GFRα receptor (Durbec, 1996) 
(Jing, 1997) (Treanor, 1996) (Trupp, 1999). Functional specificity of RET signaling is achieved 
by the specific GDNF family member binding to its preferred GFRα receptor.  
In adult humans, GFRα3 receptors are localized to dorsal root, trigeminal and sympathetic 
ganglia, as well as peripheral nerves (Bespalov, 2007). GFRα3 is also expressed in the 
gastrointestinal system, and in mice this expression has been localized to the myenteric plexus of 
both the small and large intestine (unpublished results). Artemin RNA expression is observed in 
epithelial cells and keratinocytes (Mabbott, 2013) (unpublished results). Low levels of artemin 
RNA expression have also been reported in adult normal human tissues such as prostate, 
pituitary, and brain. Increased artemin RNA expression is reported in disease states such as 
chronic pancreatitis (Ceyhan, 2007), burning mouth syndrome (Shinoda, 2015), and atopic 
dermatitis (Murota, 2012). In conditions of tissue insult, such as local inflammation or trauma, it 
is hypothesized that the GFRα3-artemin signaling pathway is activated in small diameter sensory 
neurons (positive for RET, Tropomyosin receptor kinase A [TrkA], transient receptor potential 
caption channel subfamily V member 1 [TRPV1], and calcitonin gene-related peptide [CGRP] 
expression). This activation may in turn upregulate these pathways, leading to hyperalgesia or 
allodynia. In support of a role for GFRα3 signaling during pain states, pre-clinical studies have 
demonstrated that both anti-mouse and anti-human GFRα3 receptor antibodies induced 
significant reductions in tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in the peri-articular complete 
Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) model of inflammatory joint pain. Both mouse and human anti-GFRα3 
receptor antibodies also reduced the level of tactile allodynia in the destabilization of the medial 
meniscus mouse model of knee OA. The preclinical findings suggest that modulating the GFRα3 
pathway may provide an analgesic effect in patients with chronic pain conditions, such as pain 
due to OA of the knee.  
REGN5069 is a human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds GFRα3 with subnanomolar 
affinity. Through its binding to the extracellular domain of GFRα3, REGN5069 interferes with 
the interaction of GFRα3 with RET and prevents GFRα3-mediated RET signaling. REGN5069 
was isolated from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (Regeneron’s) VelocImmune® human 
antibody mouse platform (Macdonald, 2014) (Murphy, 2014) and contains a human light chain 
variable domain fused to a human kappa constant domain and a human heavy chain variable 
region fused to a human IgG4 constant domain. The IgG4 constant domain contains a serine to 
proline amino acid substitution (S228P, Eu numbering, designated IgG4P) in the hinge region 
that reconstructs the human IgG1 hinge sequence (CPPC) to promote stabilization of disulfide 
bonds between the 2 heavy chains (Yang, 2014).  
A first-in-human (FIH) randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose 
study of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of REGN5069 is currently ongoing in 
healthy volunteers. The design includes 7 cohorts: 5 cohorts to receive REGN5069 via 
intravenous (IV) injection of 30 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg, 1000 mg, or 3000 mg, and 2 cohorts to 
receive 300 mg or 600 mg by subcutaneous (SC) injection. To date, at which point dosing has 
been completed in the FIH study, REGN5069 has been well tolerated and no serious or severe 
adverse events (AEs) have been reported.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 19 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
To the best of the sponsor’s knowledge, REGN5069 is the first-in-class antibody intervening in 
the GFRα3 signaling pathway to be developed as a potential analgesic agent. This proof-of-
concept study is designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of 2 IV doses of REGN5069 in male 
and female patients with chronic pain due to knee OA after 12 weeks of treatment. The higher 
dose regimen is selected to maintain REGN5069 serum concentrations in excess of those 
associated with efficacy in a mouse model of thermal hyperalgesia and/or those associated with 
saturation of target-mediated disposition in serum, for the duration of each dosing interval. A 
lower dose regimen, which is expected to provide adequate separation in exposure and effect, 
also will be evaluated. 
Additional background information on REGN5069 and the development program may be found 
in the current version of the Investigator’s Brochure.   
2. 
STUDY OBJECTIVES  
2.1. 
Primary Objective 
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of REGN5069 compared to placebo 
in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed OA of the knee who have a history of 
inadequate joint pain relief or intolerance to current analgesic therapy. 
2.2. 
Secondary Objectives 
The secondary objectives of the study are: 
 To characterize the concentrations of functional REGN5069 in serum over time when 
patients are treated for up to 12 weeks 
 To assess the safety and tolerability of REGN5069 compared with placebo when 
patients are treated for up to 12 weeks 
 To measure levels of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against REGN5069 following 
multiple IV administrations  
2.3. 
Exploratory Objectives  
The exploratory objectives of the study are: 
 To evaluate the effect of REGN5069 on inflammation in patients compared to that of 
placebo 
 To evaluate the use of a digital, wearable, insole device to assess gait parameters and 
functional mobility in patients with OA of the knee without an analgesic treatment 
and after administration of a potential analgesic treatment  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 20 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3. 
HYPOTHESIS AND RATIONALE  
3.1. 
Hypothesis 
Based on its mechanism of action, REGN5069 is expected to provide clinically meaningful pain 
relief as assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain 
subscale score in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed OA of the knee.  
3.2. 
Rationale 
3.2.1. 
Rationale for Study Design 
This randomized, double-blind, multi-dose, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study is designed to 
evaluate the safety and efficacy of REGN5069 in patients with pain due to OA of the knee who 
have a history of inadequate pain relief from acetaminophen* and a history of intolerance or 
inadequate pain relief from oral NSAIDs (eg, prescription NSAIDs or over the counter NSAIDs 
at or near prescription doses), and opioid therapy or unavailability of opioid therapy. This study 
will guide further clinical development of REGN5069.  
No safety concerns related to inhibition of the GFRα3 receptor have been identified either in the 
literature or in preclinical toxicology studies performed by the sponsor. Preliminary safety data 
from the FIH study, including the 3000 mg IV cohort in healthy subjects, indicate that 
REGN5069 is well tolerated and that the safety is adequate for continued development. At the 
same time, the present study is planned to be conducted in patients suffering from chronic pain 
due to knee OA, who are either intolerant to or whose pain is not adequately relieved by the 
currently available analgesic agents, including acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and opioids. In 
addition, all of these agents are associated with risks of significant adverse effects, including 
gastrointestinal bleeding, increased risk of cardiovascular events and kidney damage associated 
with long-standing use of NSAIDs, and nausea, constipation, cognitive deficits, and undesired 
behaviors such as abuse and addiction associated with chronic use of opiates. Therefore, the 
subset of OA patients eligible for this study represents a patient population with an unmet 
medical need in whom the high disease burden of painful knee OA and the available safety and 
tolerability information for REGN5069 indicate that it is appropriate to prospectively study the 
hypothesis that REGN5069 provides substantial benefit (ie, clinically meaningful relief of pain 
from knee OA) and has an acceptable safety profile. Rescue medication (acetaminophen) will be 
allowed for any patient with breakthrough pain.  
The study design is based on similar studies in the therapeutic area of chronic pain relief. The 
WOMAC survey, from which the primary endpoint and many of the secondary efficacy 
endpoints will be assessed, is a validated measurement used to assess pain, stiffness, and daily 
functioning in patients with OA.  
Studies investigating agents that block neuronal growth factor (NGF) in a patient population with 
chronic pain due to OA have identified safety concerns, especially adjudicated arthropathies. The 
mechanism for these effects remain unknown but some have postulated that the arthropathy is 
related, at least in part, to the analgesia. Other serious potential risks include those related to 
sympathetic blockade, including potential effects on blood pressure. Accordingly, rigorous, 
precautionary safety monitoring (Section 8.2.3), including regular X-ray and magnetic resonance 
imaging (MRI), a joint pain questionnaire, and physical examinations with a focus on joints, 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 21 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
neurological examinations, monitoring of orthostatic vital signs, and laboratory testing is 
implemented in this study. In addition, a prolonged safety follow-up period of 24 weeks (twice 
the duration of the treatment period) is included in this study. While at present, there is no 
evidence that safety concerns associated with anti-NGF agents are associated with blocking 
GFRα3, this rigorous medical monitoring is implemented to identify and protect patients against 
such potential concerns. Additionally, an end-of-study phone call approximately 52 weeks after 
the first dose of study drug will be conducted to collect long-term information beyond the 
follow-up period regarding whether a patient underwent, is scheduled for, or is on a waiting list 
to receive joint replacement surgery, or whether joint replacement was recommended but the 
patient elected to defer. 
* Note: The International Nonproprietary Name (INN) for acetaminophen is paracetamol. This 
protocol will use the US Adopted Name acetaminophen.  
3.2.2. 
Rationale for Dose Selection 
Two dose regimens are planned for evaluation in this study. The high dose, 1000 mg IV Q4W, 
aims to deliver concentrations of REGN5069 in serum expected to exceed those associated with 
efficacy in a mouse thermal hyperalgesia model and those associated with target saturation in 
serum, for the duration of each dosing interval. The goal for the low dose, 100 mg IV Q4W, is to 
probe the dose-response curve with a dose expected to have adequate separation in exposure 
from the high dose and have efficacy that is less than that associated with the high dose but still 
measurably greater than the control.  
For the high dose regimen, the target serum concentration to be exceeded at the end of each 
dosing interval (trough concentration [Ctrough]) includes 80 mg/L, the mean Ctrough for a dose with 
near maximal efficacy identified in a mouse artemin thermal hyperalgesia model, and the 
concentration of REGN5069 in serum associated with saturation of GFRα3. The latter was 
estimated using the available human PK data from the R5069-HV-1810 FIH study (Clinical 
Pharmacology data memo 19 Mar 2019). Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) 
data in mice and serum target saturation data in humans were considered since it is not currently 
known which is better correlated with efficacy in humans. As noted above, the high dose 
regimen is selected to maintain serum concentrations of REGN5069 above these target 
concentrations through the end of each dosing interval and to yield a cumulative area under the 
curve (AUC) for the entire treatment period less than that observed for the no-observed-adverse-
effect level (NOAEL) dose of 50 mg/kg in the 13-week monkey toxicology study. Based on 
population PK simulations in a virtual population of 500 subjects, a 1000 mg IV Q4W dosing 
regimen is predicted to yield a serum Ctrough increasing from ~100 mg/L at the end of the first 
dosing interval to ~200 mg/L at the end of the last dosing interval, and a cumulative AUC 
~8-fold less than that observed for the 13-week monkey NOAEL.  
For the low dose regimen, the target serum concentration to be exceeded at the end of each 
dosing interval is 3 mg/L, the estimated mean Ctrough in serum for the minimally efficacious dose 
in a mouse CFA inflammatory joint pain model. Based on population PK simulations, a 100 mg 
IV Q4W dosing regimen is predicted to yield a Ctrough increasing from ~8 mg/L at the end of the 
first dosing interval to ~11 mg/L at the end of the last dosing interval, with a cumulative AUC 
~93-fold less than that observed for the 13-week monkey NOAEL.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 22 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3.3. 
Risk-Benefit 
Based on the FIH study, the doses selected for this study (Section 3.2.2), and the extensive 
medical monitoring that will be performed (Section 8.2.3), the sponsor expects minimal risk to 
the study participants. Patients with a diagnosis of OA of the knee who participate in this study 
may benefit from study drug administration by experiencing relief of pain due to OA. 
Considering the unmet medical need for patients with pain due to OA, the sponsor considers the 
benefit-risk to be positive for this study. 
Additional risk-benefit assessment information on REGN5069 may be found in the current 
version of the Investigator’s Brochure.  
4. 
STUDY ENDPOINTS AND VARIABLES 
4.1. 
Primary and Secondary Endpoints 
4.1.1. 
Primary Endpoint 
The primary endpoint of the study is the change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC pain 
subscale score in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo. 
4.1.2. 
Secondary Endpoints 
4.1.2.1. 
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints 
The secondary efficacy endpoints of the study are: 
 Change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC total score (based on the full 
survey) in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo 
 Change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC physical function subscale score in 
patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo 
 Change from baseline to week 12 in the Patient Global Assessment score in patients 
treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo 
 Change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC stiffness subscale score in patients 
treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo 
 Percentage of patients treated with REGN5069, compared to that of patients treated 
with placebo, who had a response at week 12, with response defined as an 
improvement by ≥30% in the WOMAC pain subscale scores 
4.1.2.2. 
Secondary Safety Endpoints 
The secondary safety endpoints of the study are: 
 The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients treated with 
REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo throughout the study duration 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 23 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 The incidence of imaging abnormalities consistent with accelerated arthropathies as 
assessed by X-ray and MRI in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients 
treated with placebo throughout the study duration 
 Presence of anti-REGN5069 antibody development in patients treated with 
REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo throughout the study duration 
4.1.3. 
Exploratory Endpoints 
The exploratory endpoints of the study are: 
 Area under the curve for WOMAC pain subscale score (for the 12-week treatment 
period) for patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with 
placebo 
 Change in high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) from baseline to week 12 in 
patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo 
 Change in alkaline phosphatase from baseline to week 12 in patients treated with 
REGN5069 compared to patients treated with placebo 
 Conditional endpoints: if a mean 10% increase in alkaline phosphatase is observed at 
week 4, CTX-1, P1NP, Osteocalcin, C1M, and C3M will be measured and change 
from baseline to week 12 in patients treated with REGN5069 compared to patients 
treated with placebo will be exploratory endpoints 
 Change in gait and functional mobility parameters recorded by a wearable insole 
device from baseline to week 12 in a subset of patients treated with REGN5069 
compared to patients treated with placebo at participating sites 
4.2. 
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics 
Baseline characteristics will include standard demography (eg, age, race, weight, height, etc.), 
disease characteristics including medical and surgical history, and medication history for each 
patient. 
4.3. 
Pharmacokinetic Variables 
The PK variable is the concentration of functional REGN5069 in serum at each time point that 
sample is collected (Table 1). 
4.4. 
Immunogenicity Variables 
The immunogenicity variables are ADA status and titer for analyzed samples collected at the 
specified study site visits (Table 1).  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 24 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
5. 
STUDY DESIGN  
5.1. 
Study Description and Duration 
This multicenter phase 2 study is planned for US and ex-US study site locations. The study 
consists of a screening period of up to 30 days, followed by a 12-week randomized, 
double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, a 24-week follow-up period, and an end-of-
study phone call approximately 52 weeks after the first dose of study drug (Figure 1). The 
purpose of the end-of-study phone call is to determine whether a patient underwent, is scheduled 
for, or is on a waiting list to receive joint replacement surgery, or whether joint replacement was 
recommended but the patient elected to defer. Thus, each patient will be enrolled in the study for 
approximately 56 weeks, including the screening period and the period up to the end-of-study 
phone call. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a low dose of REGN5069 at 
100 mg IV Q4W, a high dose of REGN5069 at 1000 mg IV Q4W, or matching placebo Q4W 
(Section 7). The index knee joint is defined as the knee joint affected by OA and selected for 
primary assessment for this study. Randomization will be stratified by Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) 
category (2-3 vs 4) of the index knee joint at the screening visit and participation in the Moticon 
sub-study (yes vs no). The use of the stratification factor based on participation in the Moticon 
sub-study ensures balance in the treatment assignments within the Moticon sub-study.  
Efficacy will be measured according to the assessments detailed in Section 8.2.2. Safety will be 
assessed according to the procedures in Section 8.2.3.  
Figure 1: 
Study Flow Diagram 
 
 
Screening 
Period 
 
Treatment Perioda 
 
Follow-Up Period 
 
Phone Call for 
Joint 
Replacement 
Status 
Questionnaire 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Up to 30 
days 
12 weeks 
24 weeks 
16 weeks 
 
 
Day 1 
(Baseline) 
 
Week 12 
(End of Treatment) 
 
Week 36 
(End of Follow-up) 
Week 52 
(End of Study) 
 
 
 
a - Study drug will be administered every 4 weeks throughout the 12-week treatment period. Thus, study drug will be 
administered at the day 1 (baseline) visit and at the week 4 and week 8 visits. 
5.1.1. 
Study Stopping Rules 
An independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) will monitor unblinded data 
(Section 5.3.1). Based on these reviews in the context of the totality of evidence, if there are 
significant concerns at any time regarding a safety issue, the IDMC may make a 
recommendation to the sponsor to temporarily pause, alter, or terminate the study. Once 
recommendations from the IDMC have been received, further discussions may be conducted, if 
appropriate, and the sponsor will determine if these or other actions should be taken.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 25 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
5.1.2. 
End of Study Definition 
The end of study is defined as the date when the last patient completes the last phone call, 
withdraws from the study, or is lost to follow-up (ie, the patient can no longer be contacted by 
the investigator).  
5.2. 
Planned Interim Analysis  
No interim analysis is planned. Upon completion of 12 weeks of treatment for all patients, a 
12-week analysis will be performed for the primary efficacy endpoint.  
5.3. 
Study Committees  
5.3.1. 
Independent Data Monitoring Committee 
An IDMC will be implemented in the study. The IDMC will meet periodically to review 
unblinded data as the study progresses, and based upon the findings, will make recommendations 
to the sponsor about the conduct of the study. The IDMC will be comprised of independent 
statistical and medical/medical imaging experts. Further details will be defined in the IDMC 
charter.  
6. 
SELECTION, WITHDRAWAL, AND REPLACEMENT OF 
PATIENTS 
6.1. 
Number of Patients Planned 
Up to approximately 240 patients are planned for enrollment in this study. 
6.2. 
Study Population 
Men and women who are at least 40 years of age at the time of study entry with a clinical 
diagnosis of OA of the knee based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with 
radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2) at the index knee joint. 
6.2.1. 
Inclusion Criteria  
A patient must meet the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: 
1. Male or female, ≥40 years of age at the screening visit 
2. Generally in good health at the screening visit 
3. Body mass index (BMI) ≤39 kg/m2 at the screening visit 
4. Clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee based on the American College of Rheumatology 
criteria (Altman, 1986) with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2) at the index joint 
at the screening visit 
 The index joint is defined as the joint with OA under evaluation for this study 
 A joint that has previously undergone joint replacement surgery cannot be the index 
joint 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 26 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 A joint previously surgically modified within the past year cannot be the index joint 
 If a patient has a K-L score of ≥2 at more than 1 knee joint, the index joint is the joint 
with the greatest WOMAC pain subscore at the screening visit. If both knee joints 
have a K-L score of ≥2 and the same WOMAC pain subscore, the index joint is the 
joint with the greater K-L score. If both knee joints have a K-L score of ≥2, the same 
WOMAC pain subscores, and the same K-L scores, then the investigator may choose 
1 of these joints as the index joint. 
5. Moderate-to-severe pain in the index joint defined as a WOMAC pain subscore of ≥4 at 
both the screening and baseline visits 
6. A history of inadequate pain relief from or intolerance to analgesics used for OA as 
defined by:  
 inadequate pain relief from acetaminophen, and 
 intolerance to or inadequate pain relief from at least 1 oral NSAID, and 
 intolerance to or inadequate pain relief from at least 1 opioid, or unwillingness to take 
opioid therapy or lack of access to opioid therapy 
7. History of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain (defined as use with regular 
frequency with an optimal regimen over a period of at least 4 weeks), including NSAIDs, 
selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, opioids, acetaminophen, or combinations thereof 
within 2 years prior to screening 
8. No use of opioid medications for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit 
9. Willing to discontinue current acetaminophen or NSAID medications (oral or topical; 
except up to 150 mg/day of aspirin, which is permitted for cardiac prophylaxis) starting at 
the screening visit through the end of the study treatment 
10. Willing to maintain current activity and exercise levels throughout the study 
11. Willing to provide follow-up information related to any joint replacement surgery that 
occurs within the period of time covered by the patient’s intended participation in the 
study 
12. Willing to consent to providing joint material and having histological and molecular 
analyses conducted on this material if the patient undergoes a joint replacement surgery 
while participating in the study 
13. Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures 
14. Provide informed consent signed by study patient or legally acceptable representative 
15. Able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires 
6.2.2. 
Exclusion Criteria  
A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: 
1. Diagnosis of systemic diseases that may affect joints, including but not limited to 
inflammatory joint diseases, pseudogout, endocrinopathies (with exception of 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 27 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
hypothyroidism), lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, joint infections, neuropathic 
disorders, avascular necrosis, Paget’s disease, renal osteodystrophy, sickle cell disease, 
including S-C disease and S-β thalassemia, or tumors. 
Note: Patients with a history of hypothyroidism must have thyroid-stimulating hormone 
levels measured and must be in an euthyroid state to be eligible for study participation. 
2. History or presence of osteonecrosis, destructive arthropathy, neuropathic joint 
arthropathy, pathologic fractures in any shoulder, hip, or knee joint(s), hip dislocation 
(prosthetic hip dislocation is eligible), or knee dislocation (patella dislocation is eligible) 
at the screening visit. Presence of subchondral insufficiency fracture on screening films 
or MRI as assessed by the central imaging reader. 
3. Trauma to the index joint within 30 days prior to the screening visit, significant enough in 
the opinion of the investigator to interfere with response to investigational agent 
4. Active fibromyalgia, as diagnosed by the investigator and/or documented in the patient’s 
medical history, regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compression with 
radiculopathy or other moderate-to-severe pain that may confound assessments or 
self-evaluation of the pain associated with OA 
5. Is scheduled for a joint replacement surgery to be performed during the study period 
6. Not suitable for MRI scan in the judgement of the investigator 
7. Received an intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid in any joint within 90 days prior 
to the screening visit 
8. Systemic (ie, IV, oral, or intramuscular) corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the 
screening visit. Intra-articular corticosteroids in the index joint within 12 weeks prior to 
the screening visit, or to any other joint within 30 days prior to the screening visit 
(topical, intranasal, or inhaled corticosteroids are permitted). 
9. Use of a monoamine reuptake or a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (eg, tricyclic 
antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin norepinephrine 
reuptake inhibitors) for treatment of pain within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.  
Notes:  
 Use of a monoamine reuptake or monoamine oxidase inhibitor is acceptable if used 
for treatment of anxiety and/or depression at a stable dose during at least 3 months 
prior to screening 
 If in the judgement of an investigator a monoamine reuptake or a monoamine oxidase 
inhibitor is used for treatment of both pain and anxiety/depression at a stable dose 
during at least 3 months prior to screening, use of the monoamine reuptake or 
monoamine oxidase inhibitor is acceptable if the investigator is able to provide 
appropriate documentation (eg, medical records with appropriate diagnoses, clinical 
opinions of the patient’s treating physicians, documentation of the investigator’s 
clinical opinion). 
10.  History or presence at the screening visit of multiple sclerosis, autonomic neuropathy, 
diabetic neuropathy, or other peripheral neuropathy 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 28 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
11. Significant concomitant illness including, but not limited to, psychiatric, cardiac, renal, 
hepatic, neurological, endocrinological, metabolic, or lymphatic disease that, in the 
opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect the patient’s participation in the study 
12. History of hospital admission for depression or suicide attempt within 5 years or active, 
severe major depression at screening 
13. Resting heart rate of <45 beats per minute (bpm) (by vital sign assessment or as captured 
during electrocardiogram [ECG] assessment) or history or presence of second- or 
third-degree heart block at the screening visit. Resting heart rate may be rechecked up to 
2 times at the screening visit. 
14. History or presence of orthostatic hypotension at the screening visit. If the initial 
assessment for orthostatic hypotension is positive, orthostatic vital signs can be repeated 
up to 2 more times to confirm orthostatic hypotension prior to making the decision to 
exclude the patient. Refer to Section 8.2.3.2 for more information regarding this 
assessment. 
15. History of poorly controlled hypertension, as defined by: 
 Systolic blood pressure ≥180 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg at the 
screening visit 
 Systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg to 179 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of 
100 mm Hg to 109 mm Hg at the screening visit, AND a history of end organ damage 
(including history of left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, angina, myocardial 
infraction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, peripheral arterial disease, and 
moderate-to-advanced retinopathy [hemorrhages or exudates, papilledema]).  
Note: Blood pressure can be rechecked twice at the screening visit.  
16. History of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndromes, transient ischemic attack, or 
cerebrovascular accident within 12 months prior to the screening visit 
17. Poorly controlled diabetes (defined as hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] >9.0%) at the screening 
visit. This parameter may be re-checked once during the screening period.  
18. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, except for patients 
who are stable on treatment for at least 1 year prior to the screening visit 
19. Known history of infection with hepatitis B virus. Patients with a history of hepatitis B 
are eligible if there is documentation of a negative test for hepatitis B surface antigen and 
a positive test for antibodies to the hepatitis B virus surface antigen.  
20. Known history of infection with hepatitis C virus. Patients with a history of hepatitis C 
are eligible if there is documentation of a negative hepatitis C virus RNA test. 
21. History or presence of malignancy within approximately 5 years prior to screening or 
continuing active treatment of malignancy regardless of history, except patients who have 
been treated successfully with no recurrence for >1 year of basal or squamous cell 
carcinoma of the skin or in situ cervical cancer 
22. Known allergy or sensitivity to doxycycline or related compounds, or monoclonal 
antibodies 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 29 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
23. History of (within approximately 5 years prior to the screening visit) or current 
alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance abuse, or abuse of prescription pain medication, as 
documented in the medical history or in the judgement of the investigator 
24. History of cannabis use for the treatment of pain or for recreational use within 
approximately the past 6 months prior to the screening visit 
25. Participation in any clinical research study evaluating another investigational drug within 
30 days or at least 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of the investigational drug, prior to 
the screening visit 
26. History of exposure to an anti-NGF treatment 
27. Members of the clinical site study team and/or his/her immediate family, unless prior 
approval granted by the Sponsor 
28. Sexually active men who are unwilling to use the following forms of medically 
acceptable birth control during the study drug treatment period and for at least 9 months 
after the last dose of study drug: vasectomy with medical assessment of surgical success 
OR consistent use of a condom. Sperm donation is prohibited during the study and for at 
least 9 months after the last dose of study drug.  
29. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP)* who have a positive pregnancy test result, 
or who do not have their pregnancy test results at baseline. 
30. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 
31. Women of childbearing potential* who are unwilling to practice highly effective 
contraception from the screening visit until at least 9 months after the last dose of study 
drug. Highly effective contraceptive measures include: 
a. stable use of combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal 
contraception (oral, intravaginal, transdermal) or progestogen-only hormonal 
contraception (oral, injectable, implantable) associated with inhibition of ovulation 
initiated 2 or more menstrual cycles prior to screening 
b. intrauterine device; intrauterine hormone-releasing system 
c. bilateral tubal ligation 
d. vasectomized partner 
e. and/or sexual abstinence†, ‡ 
* Postmenopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months and must have 
follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the postmenopausal range in order not to be 
considered of childbearing potential. Pregnancy testing and contraception are not 
required for women with documented hysterectomy or tubal ligation.  
† Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining 
from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the 
study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation 
to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. 
‡ Periodic abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), withdrawal 
(coitus interruptus), spermicides only, and lactational amenorrhea method are not 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 30 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
acceptable methods of contraception. Female condom and male condom should not 
be used together.  
32. Use of genicular nerve block or any similar procedure(s) within 3 months of the 
screening visit 
6.3. 
Premature Withdrawal from the Study 
A patient has the right to withdraw from the study at any time, for any reason, and without 
repercussion. 
The investigator and/or sponsor have the right to withdraw a patient from the study if it is no 
longer in the interest of the patient to continue in the study, or if the patient’s continuation in the 
study places the scientific outcome of the study at risk (eg, if a patient does not or cannot follow 
study procedures). An excessive rate of withdrawals would render the study uninterpretable; 
therefore, unnecessary withdrawal of patients should be avoided. 
Patients who are withdrawn prematurely from the study will be asked to complete study 
assessments, as described in Section 8.1.3.  
Rules for discontinuation of study treatment are discussed in Section 7.3.2.  
6.4. 
Replacement of Patients  
Patients prematurely withdrawn from the study or study drug will not be replaced. 
7. 
STUDY TREATMENTS  
7.1. 
Investigational Treatments 
REGN5069 will be supplied for this study in blinded kits as follows: 
 REGN5069 lyophilized powder, 265 mg in a vial 
 REGN5069 lyophilized powder, placebo in a vial 
Instructions for dose preparation and study drug administration are provided in the pharmacy 
manual. 
Randomized patients will receive a total of 3 fixed-dose IV infusions of either REGN5069 at 
100 mg, REGN5069 at 1000 mg, or placebo (depending on their treatment assignment) Q4W 
during the 12-week treatment period at the visits indicated in the Schedule of Events (Table 1).  
7.2. 
Rescue Treatment 
Starting at the screening visit until after the week-24 study visit is completed, acetaminophen is 
the only study-permitted rescue medication. Acetaminophen tablets of selected brand and 
strength will be provided to patients by the study site for use as rescue medication for 
breakthrough OA pain. In advance of initiating the study, each study site must consult with the 
sponsor and select the brand and the strength of acetaminophen tablets that will be dispensed to 
patients as rescue medication. In the event that pain relief for OA pain is inadequate, patients will 
take acetaminophen, as needed, in accordance with the instructions provided with the medication 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 31 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
by each study site, with a maximum of 3000 mg/day. To prevent liver damage, the maximum 
allowed daily dose of 3000 mg of acetaminophen must not be exceeded and excessive alcohol 
consumption must be avoided. The use of rescue medication is not allowed for 48 hours prior to 
the start of or during a scheduled study visit to minimize the confounding effects of rescue 
medication on efficacy measures.  
7.3. 
Dose Modification and Study Treatment Discontinuation Rules 
7.3.1. 
Dose Modification 
Dose modification for an individual patient is not allowed. 
7.3.2. 
Study Drug Discontinuation 
Patients who permanently discontinue from study drug and who do not withdraw from the study 
will be asked to return to the clinic for all remaining study visits and to participate in all study 
phone calls per the visit schedule. 
Patients who permanently discontinue from study drug and who opt to withdraw from the study 
will be asked to complete study assessments, per Section 8.1.3.  
7.3.2.1. 
Reasons for Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug 
Study drug dosing will be permanently stopped in the event of: 
 Continued noncompliance with the protocol-defined maximum allowed dosage of 
acetaminophen 
 Evidence of pregnancy 
 Serious or severe allergic reactions considered related to study drug 
 If there are specific types of liver dysfunction (eg, Hy’s law is met). Hy's law consists 
of elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 
by 3-fold of upper limit of normal (ULN) or more and elevation of serum total 
bilirubin by 2-fold of ULN or more and there are no other reasons to explain observed 
elevations in aminotransferases and bilirubin. 
 Patient withdraws consent  
7.4. 
Management of Acute Reactions 
7.4.1. 
Acute Intravenous Infusion Reactions 
Emergency equipment and medication for the treatment of infusion reactions must be available 
for immediate use. All infusion reactions must be reported as AEs (as defined in Section 9.4.1) 
and graded using the grading scales (as instructed in Section 9.5.1).  
7.4.1.1. 
Interruption of the Intravenous Infusion 
The infusion should be interrupted if any of the following AEs are observed: 
 cough 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 32 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 rigors/chills 
 rash, pruritus (itching) 
 urticaria (hives, welts, wheals) 
 diaphoresis (sweating) 
 hypotension 
 dyspnea (shortness of breath) 
 vomiting 
 flushing 
The reaction(s) should be treated symptomatically, and the infusion may be restarted at 50% of 
the original rate or based on the clinical judgement of the investigator. 
If investigators feel there is a medical need for treatment or discontinuation of the infusion, they 
should use clinical judgment to provide the appropriate response according to typical clinical 
practice. 
7.4.1.2. 
Termination of the Intravenous Infusion 
The infusion should be terminated and NOT restarted if any of the following AEs occur: 
 Anaphylaxis* 
 laryngeal/pharyngeal edema 
 severe bronchospasm 
 chest pain 
 seizure 
 severe hypotension 
 other neurological symptoms (confusion, loss of consciousness, paresthesia, paralysis, 
etc.) 
 any other symptom or sign that, in the opinion of the investigator, warrants 
termination of the IV infusion 
*Consider anaphylaxis if the following is observed (Sampson, 2006): acute onset of an illness 
(minutes to several hours) with involvement of the skin, mucosal tissue, or both (eg, generalized 
hives, pruritus or ﬂushing, swollen lips-tongue-uvula) AND AT LEAST 1 OF THE 
FOLLOWING: 
 Respiratory compromise (eg, dyspnea, wheeze-bronchospasm, stridor, reduced peak 
expiratory flow, hypoxemia) 
 Reduced blood pressure or associated symptoms of end-organ dysfunction 
(eg, hypotonia [collapse], syncope, incontinence)  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 33 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
7.5. 
Method of Treatment Assignment  
Up to approximately 240 patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio (approximately 80 patients 
per treatment group) to receive REGN5069 at 100 mg IV Q4W, REGN5069 at 1000 mg IV 
Q4W, or matching placebo Q4W according to a central randomization scheme provided by an 
Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) to the designated study pharmacist (or qualified 
designee). Randomization will be stratified by K-L category (2-3 vs 4) of the index knee joint at 
the screening visit and participation in the Moticon sub-study (yes vs no).  
7.5.1. 
Blinding  
Study patients, the principal/coordinating investigators, and study site personnel will remain 
blinded to all randomization assignments throughout the study. The Regeneron study team and 
contract research organization (CRO) personnel who are in regular contact with the study sites 
will remain blinded to all patient randomization assignments.  
Blinded study drug kits coded with a drug numbering system will be used. To maintain the blind, 
lists linking these codes with product lot numbers will not be accessible to individuals involved 
in study conduct.  
Anti-drug antibody and PK results will not be communicated to the sites before the end of the 
study and the final database lock, and the sponsor’s operational team will not have access to 
results associated with patient identification until after the final database lock.  
Selected individuals not involved in the conduct of the study may have access to unblinded data 
(individual treatment assignments) as needed for safety review or other data review. No study 
personnel involved in the day-to-day conduct of the study will have access to any individual 
unblinded data before the database is locked for this study.  
7.5.2. 
Emergency Unblinding 
Unblinding of treatment assignment for a patient may be necessary due to a medical emergency 
or any other significant medical event (eg, pregnancy) and when a treatment decision is 
contingent upon knowing the patient’s treatment assignment. Study drug will be discontinued for 
patients whose treatment has been unblinded.  
If unblinding is required: 
 Only the investigator will make the decision to unblind the treatment assignment. 
 Only the affected patients will be unblinded. 
 The designated study pharmacist(s)/designee at the study site will provide the 
treatment assignment to the investigator. If there is no study pharmacist, the 
investigator for the site will unblind the patient. Unblinding is performed using the 
IWRS, which will notify Regeneron.  
 The investigator will notify Regeneron and/or designee as soon as possible after 
unblinding the patient. 
Treatment assignment is not to be provided to site personnel, other than the unblinded study 
pharmacist (when applicable), at any time during the conduct of the study, except in the case of a 
true emergency and when a treatment decision is contingent on knowing the patient’s treatment 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 34 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
assignment. In the event that there is no study pharmacist, the individual at the site fulfilling that 
role will be the only unblinded member of the site personnel. 
7.6. 
Treatment Logistics and Accountability 
7.6.1. 
Packaging, Labeling, and Storage  
A medication numbering system will be used to label blinded investigational study drug. Lists 
linking medication numbers with product lot numbers will be maintained by the groups (or 
companies) responsible for study drug packaging. In order to maintain the blind, these lists will 
not be accessible to individuals involved in study conduct. 
Study drug will be stored at the site at a temperature of 2ºC to 8ºC; storage instructions will be 
provided in the pharmacy manual. 
7.6.2. 
Supply and Disposition of Treatments  
Study drug will be shipped at a temperature of 2ºC to 8ºC to the investigator or designee at 
regular intervals or as needed during the study. At specified time points during the study (eg, 
interim site monitoring visits), at the site close-out visit, and following drug reconciliation and 
documentation by the site monitor, all opened and unopened study drug will be returned to the 
sponsor or designee for destruction. 
7.6.3. 
Treatment Accountability 
All drug accountability records must be kept current. 
The investigator must be able to account for all opened and unopened study drug. These records 
should contain the dates, quantity, and study medication 
 dispensed to each patient, 
 returned from each patient (if applicable), and 
 returned to the sponsor or designee. 
All accountability records must be made available for inspection by the sponsor and regulatory 
agency inspectors; photocopies must be provided to the sponsor at the conclusion of the study. 
7.6.4. 
Treatment Compliance 
All drug compliance records must be kept current and made available for inspection by the 
sponsor and regulatory agency inspectors. 
7.7. 
Concomitant Medications and Procedures  
Any treatment administered and/or procedures performed from screening to the end of the 
follow-up period will be considered concomitant medication and/or procedures, respectively. 
This includes medications and/or procedures that were started before the study and are ongoing 
during the study.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 35 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
7.7.1. 
Prohibited Medications and Procedures 
Patients will be required to discontinue all non-study-permitted pain medication (oral or topical) 
starting at the screening visit until after completion of the week-24 study visit. Concomitant 
medications that contain NSAIDs are prohibited from the screening visit until after completion 
of the week-24 study visit. This applies even if a patient discontinues study drug prematurely but 
remains in the study to participate in the remaining study visits. The only exception is 
aspirin/5-aminosalicylic acid, which is permitted for cardiac prophylaxis (Section 7.7.2). Opioid 
analgesic medications (including tramadol) are prohibited starting at least 4 weeks prior to the 
screening visit until the end of the follow-up period with no exceptions.  
Other excluded medications/procedures starting at the screening period include: 
 Any other investigational agent 
 Medical or regular recreational use of marijuana 
 Chondroitin sulfate 
 Glucosamine  
 Hyaluronic Acid Intra-articular injections 
 Anticoagulants and antiplatelets (eg, warfarin, heparins, factor Xa inhibitors, 
thrombin inhibitors, aspirin >150 mg daily, clopidogrel) 
 Muscle relaxants including cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol, orphenadrine, tizanidine 
(see Section 7.7.2 for permitted muscle relaxants) 
 Corticosteroids (topical, intranasal, and inhaled formulations are permitted), 
adrenocorticotropic hormone 
 Cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus (topical tarcolimus 
allowed) 
 Azathioprine, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine 
 IL-6 or IL-6 receptor antagonists 
 Abatacept, ustekinumab  
 Tumor necrosis factor antagonists 
 IL-1 inhibitors, including diacerein  
 PDE-4 and Jak-kinase inhibitors 
 Genicular nerve block and any other similar procedures (prohibited from within 
3 months of the screening visit and up to the last study site visit in the follow-up 
period) 
7.7.2. 
Permitted Medications and Procedures 
Patients receiving any chronic medication therapy must be on a stable dose of such medication 
for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit except for the prohibited medications listed in 
Section 7.7.1.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 36 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Monoamine reuptake inhibitors (including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin 
norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) and tricyclic antidepressants, are permitted for 
non-pain-related treatment.  
Low-dose aspirin/5-aminosalicylic acid (up to 150 mg/day) for cardiac prophylaxis is also 
permitted, per local guidelines. Acetaminophen taken acutely for treatment of non-OA pain or 
fever is also permitted; however, the total daily dosage limits cannot be exceeded, regardless of 
the reason for acetaminophen use. During the treatment period and through the week-24 study 
visit, acetaminophen use will be captured in the diary; use for relief of pain other than pain due 
to OA will be reported in the diary as “other.” During the screening period and after the week-24 
study visit is completed, acetaminophen taken for any reason will be reported as concomitant 
medication.  
Topical steroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors are permitted. 
Muscle relaxants, such as Skelaxin® (metaxalone) and others, are permitted. Prohibited muscle 
relaxants are listed in Section 7.7.1.  
Physical therapies (such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture) are 
permitted during the study, provided that patients have been on a stable regimen for at least 
4 weeks prior to entering the trial and that they expect to maintain this regimen until the end of 
the follow-up period. 
Use of mobility aids (such as canes, crutches, and joint stabilization appliances) are also 
permitted, provided that patients have been on a stable level of usage for at least 4 weeks prior to 
screening. Patients will be encouraged to maintain their use of such aids at a stable level starting 
from the screening visit until the week-24 visit is completed. Use of mobility aids should be 
recorded in the CRF.  
8. 
STUDY SCHEDULE OF EVENTS AND PROCEDURES 
8.1. 
Schedule of Events 
Study assessments and procedures are presented by study period and visit in Table 1. 
 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 37 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Table 1: 
Schedule of Events 
 
Screening 
Period 
Treatment Period 
Follow-up Period 
EOS 
Study 
Procedure/Visit 
Screening 
Visit 1 
Base-
line 
Visit 2 
Visit  
3 
Visit  
4 
Visit  
5 
Visit  
6 
EOT 
Visit 7 
ET/ 
JR 
Pre-
op10 
Visit  
8 
PC 1 
Visit 
9 
PC 
2 
PC 
3 
EOF  
Visit 10 
ET/ 
JR 
Pre-
op10 
PC 
4 
Study Week 
 
 
Wk 1 
Wk 2 
Wk 4 
Wk 8 
Wk 12 
 
Wk 
16 
Wk 
20 
Wk 
24 
Wk 
28 
Wk 
32 
Wk 36 
 
Wk 
52 
Study Day (Visit 
Window, days) 
Up to 30 
days 
1 
8 
(±1) 
15  
(±3) 
29  
(±7) 
57 
(±7) 
85 
(±7) 
 
113 
(±7) 
141 
(±7) 
169 
(±7) 
197 
(±7) 
225 
(±7) 
253 
(±7) 
 
365 
(±7) 
Screening/Baseline 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inclusion/ 
Exclusion 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Informed consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical and 
medication history 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Height 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Weight 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
Dispense patient 
diary and train1 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Randomization 
  
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Efficacy Assessments2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WOMAC Pain 
Subscale 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WOMAC Full 
Survey 
 
X 
X  
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
Patient Global 
Assessment of OA 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
Treatment Procedures 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Check diary for 
recording of rescue 
medication use3 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
Concomitant 
therapies 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
IV study drug 
administration4 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Safety Assessments 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vital signs5 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Orthostatic vital 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 38 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Screening 
Period 
Treatment Period 
Follow-up Period 
EOS 
Study 
Procedure/Visit 
Screening 
Visit 1 
Base-
line 
Visit 2 
Visit  
3 
Visit  
4 
Visit  
5 
Visit  
6 
EOT 
Visit 7 
ET/ 
JR 
Pre-
op10 
Visit  
8 
PC 1 
Visit 
9 
PC 
2 
PC 
3 
EOF  
Visit 10 
ET/ 
JR 
Pre-
op10 
PC 
4 
Study Week 
 
 
Wk 1 
Wk 2 
Wk 4 
Wk 8 
Wk 12 
 
Wk 
16 
Wk 
20 
Wk 
24 
Wk 
28 
Wk 
32 
Wk 36 
 
Wk 
52 
Study Day (Visit 
Window, days) 
Up to 30 
days 
1 
8 
(±1) 
15  
(±3) 
29  
(±7) 
57 
(±7) 
85 
(±7) 
 
113 
(±7) 
141 
(±7) 
169 
(±7) 
197 
(±7) 
225 
(±7) 
253 
(±7) 
 
365 
(±7) 
sign assessment5 
Physical 
examination with 
joint exam 
X  
(full) 
X  
(full) 
X  
(brief) 
  
X  
(brief) 
X  
(brief) 
X  
(full) 
X  
(full) 
X  
(brief) 
 
X  
(brief
) 
 
 
X  
(full) 
X  
(full) 
 
Electrocardiogram 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Neurologic 
examination 
X  
(full) 
X  
(brief) 
X  
(brief) 
  
 
 
X  
(full) 
X  
(full) 
X  
(brief) 
 
X  
(brief
) 
 
 
X  
(full) 
X  
(full) 
 
Radiograph 
collection (bilateral 
knees, hips, and 
shoulders, unless 
otherwise stated)6 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
(index 
knee 
only) 
X7 
 
 
 
 
 
X  
X7 
 
MRI8 
X (index 
knee)9 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
(index 
knee) 
X 
(index 
knee)7 
 
 
 
 
 
X (index 
knee) 
X 
(index 
knee)7 
 
Joint pain 
questionnaire2 
 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Knee Society Score 
(for JR follow-
up)2,10 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Adverse events 
 
 
JR status 
questionnaire 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
Laboratory Testing 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Drug and alcohol 
test11 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
Hematology12 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
Blood chemistry12 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
ESR 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HbA1c12 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Urinalysis 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Pregnancy test (for 
X 
X 
X  
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 39 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Screening 
Period 
Treatment Period 
Follow-up Period 
EOS 
Study 
Procedure/Visit 
Screening 
Visit 1 
Base-
line 
Visit 2 
Visit  
3 
Visit  
4 
Visit  
5 
Visit  
6 
EOT 
Visit 7 
ET/ 
JR 
Pre-
op10 
Visit  
8 
PC 1 
Visit 
9 
PC 
2 
PC 
3 
EOF  
Visit 10 
ET/ 
JR 
Pre-
op10 
PC 
4 
Study Week 
 
 
Wk 1 
Wk 2 
Wk 4 
Wk 8 
Wk 12 
 
Wk 
16 
Wk 
20 
Wk 
24 
Wk 
28 
Wk 
32 
Wk 36 
 
Wk 
52 
Study Day (Visit 
Window, days) 
Up to 30 
days 
1 
8 
(±1) 
15  
(±3) 
29  
(±7) 
57 
(±7) 
85 
(±7) 
 
113 
(±7) 
141 
(±7) 
169 
(±7) 
197 
(±7) 
225 
(±7) 
253 
(±7) 
 
365 
(±7) 
WOCBP)13 
(serum) 
(urine) 
(urine) 
(urine) 
(urine) 
(urine) 
(urine) 
(seru
m) 
(urine
) 
(urine
) 
(serum) 
(seru
m) 
FSH14 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PK, Biomarker, and Research Samples 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PK sample  
 
X15 
X 
X  
X15 
X15 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
ADA samples 
 
X 
(pre-
dose) 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
hsCRP12 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
Research 
serum/plasma 
samples12 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
X  
X  
 
DNA16 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RNA (whole 
blood) 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Moticon Insole Sub-study 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Moticon sub-study 
informed consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Moticon insole 
training17 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Moticon insole 
recording18 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ADA: Anti-drug antibody 
HbA1c: Hemoglobin A1c (Glycated hemoglobin) 
Pre-op: Pre-operative 
EOF: End of follow-up 
hsCRP: high sensitivity C-reactive protein 
V: Visit 
EOS: End of study 
IV: Intravenous 
Wk: Week 
EOT: End of treatment 
JR: Joint replacement 
WOCBP: Women of childbearing potential 
ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate 
MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging 
WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index 
ET: Early termination 
PC: Phone call 
 
FSH: Follicle-stimulating hormone 
PK: Pharmacokinetic 
 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 40 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8.1.1. 
Footnotes for the Schedule of Events Table 1 
1. The patient will receive a diary in which he/she will record use of study-permitted rescue 
medication from baseline through the week-24 study visit. The patient will receive 
training on use of the diary (can be conducted at the baseline visit or earlier at the 
discretion of the investigator). The patient will be required to bring the diary to each 
study visit and it will be collected at the week-24 visit, or early if the patient terminates 
the study early.  
2. Questionnaires (including WOMAC, Patient Global Assessment score, joint pain 
questionnaire, and Knee Society Score, if necessary) will be completed by the patient. 
These assessments should be the first procedures performed during study site visits at the 
indicated visits. 
3. At each study visit indicated in the schedule of events table (Table 1), study site 
personnel will check that the patient is recording his/her use of acetaminophen as the 
study-permitted rescue medication in the patient diary. Retraining on patient diary usage 
may be requested at any visit during the study, as needed. The diary will be returned at 
the week-24 visit or at the early termination visit, if applicable.  
4. Study drug administration will be the last procedure at each dosing visit, and will be done 
after all laboratory samples have been collected (except for those specifically stated for 
collection after study drug administration), and after all study assessments and procedures 
are performed. Patients will be observed in the clinic for 1 hour after study drug 
administration.  
5. Refer to Section 8.2.3.1 for more instructions surrounding the vital sign assessment and 
to Section 8.2.3.2 for instructions for rechecking orthostatic vital sign assessments and 
for defining orthostatic hypotension.  
6. In addition to scheduled imaging, radiographs should be considered for worsening joint 
pain despite treatment with analgesics, which in the opinion of the investigator is 
inconsistent with the normal progression of OA or lasts at least 2 weeks (or less at the 
discretion of the investigator). Based on the imaging results, a patient may be 
discontinued from study drug. If this occurs, the patient should be asked to remain in the 
study and participate in study visits per the visit schedule.  
7. Early Termination: Imaging assessments (X-rays of bilateral knees, hips, and shoulders 
and MRI of the index knee) need to be repeated only if it has been >30 days since the 
joints were last imaged. If it has been ≤30 days since the joints were last imaged, imaging 
assessment may be completed at the discretion of the investigator.  
8. In addition to scheduled MRIs, an MRI should be considered for worsening joint pain 
despite treatment with analgesics, which in the opinion of the investigator is inconsistent 
with the normal progression of OA, lasts at least 2 weeks (or less at the discretion of the 
investigator), and if the X-rays are inconclusive. 
9. After the patient has otherwise met study eligibility criteria assessed during the screening 
period, an MRI of the index knee will be performed prior to the baseline visit.  
Confirmation that the images have been accepted and confirmed query-free by the central 
reader must be received by the site before the baseline visit. Confirmation that there are 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 41 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
no exclusionary findings on the MRI must be received from the central reader before a 
patient can be randomized. 
10. In the event that a patient must undergo joint replacement surgery during the study up to 
the end of the follow-up period at week 36, the patient will complete the early 
termination/joint replacement pre-operative visit as per Table 1 Schedule of Events and 
the procedures outlined in the schedule of events for joint replacement surgery follow-up 
(Table 2). The early termination/joint replacement pre-operative visit should be 
completed before the joint replacement surgery, if possible. 
11. In the event of a confirmed positive drug screen result for opiates and/or alcohol at 
screening, the patient will be excluded. A confirmed positive drug screen result for 
opiates and/or alcohol prior to the initial dose of study drug and/or during the treatment 
period must be discussed with the sponsor prior to administration of the next dose of 
study drug once the results are available. 
12. Blood samples to be obtained after at least approximately an 8-hour fast. 
13. In the event of a positive urine pregnancy test result, a serum pregnancy test should be 
performed. If the serum pregnancy test is negative, the patient may continue to receive 
study drug per the visit schedule. If the serum pregnancy test is positive, the patient 
should discontinue study drug, but should be asked to return to the clinic for all 
remaining study visits per the visit schedule. 
14. The FSH sample should be collected to confirm the postmenopausal status of a female 
patient.  
15. Two pharmacokinetic samples will be collected: the first sample prior to the dose 
administration and the second sample within 30 minutes after the end of infusion. 
16. Samples for DNA extraction should be collected at the baseline visit (pre-dose), but may 
be collected at any later study visit. 
17. Moticon insole training session will be conducted for patients in the Moticon insole 
device sub-study only, and will be held at participating clinical sites prior to recording 
sessions. 
18. Moticon insole recording sessions will be conducted for patients in the Moticon insole 
device sub-study only and will include a 3-minute walking test. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 42 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Table 2: 
Schedule of Events for Follow-up Period of Patients Who Undergo Joint 
Replacement Surgery 
 
Post-Operative1 
Long-Term1 
Follow-up Study Day (Visit window, days) 
Follow-up Visit 1 
4 weeks after joint 
replacement surgery 
Follow-up Visit 2 
20 weeks after joint 
replacement surgery 
Follow-up Day 29 (±7) 
Follow-up Day 140 (±7) 
Collection of surgically resected tissue for histological 
and molecular analyses 
X 
Treatment 
 
Concomitant medications and therapy 
X 
X 
Safety 
 
 
Medical history related to the joint replacement 
X 
X 
Adverse events 
 
Vital signs 
X 
X 
Physical examination with joint exam 
X 
X 
Knee Society Score2 
X 
X 
Radiograph of knees, hips, and shoulders (bilateral) 
 
X 
8.1.2. 
Footnotes for Schedule of Events for Follow-up Period of Patients Who Undergo 
Joint Replacement Surgery (Table 2) 
1. Any patient who has joint replacement surgery during the study up to the end of the 
follow-up period at week 36 will be asked to return to the site at 4 and 20 weeks after the 
surgery date for safety evaluations. Relevant information related to the surgery will be 
collected at the week-4 visit, including placement of the prosthesis and healing of the 
surgical wound. The visit at 20 weeks after surgery will include an assessment of OA 
progression (including repeat radiographs of both knees) and the collection of any 
information about joint-related pain or AEs (including joint replacement) that may have 
taken place since the last clinic visit. 
2. Formal post-operative assessment of joint replacements will be done by completing the 
Knee Society Score questionnaire for knee replacements. 
8.1.3. 
Early Termination Visit 
Patients who are withdrawn from the study before the primary endpoint visit (week 12) will be 
asked to return to the clinic for 2 visits: once for an early termination visit consisting of the early 
termination assessments described in Table 1 and again at the primary endpoint visit (week 12), 
for studies with a primary efficacy endpoint. Patients who are withdrawn from the study after the 
primary endpoint visit will be asked to return to the clinic for early termination assessments, 
only. 
8.1.4. 
Unscheduled Visits 
All attempts should be made to keep patients on the study schedule. Unscheduled visits may be 
necessary to repeat testing following abnormal laboratory results, for follow-up of AEs, or for 
any other reason, as warranted. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 43 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8.2. 
Study Procedures 
8.2.1. 
Procedures Performed at the Screening/Baseline Visit 
Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed at the screening visit to determine study 
eligibility, including an assessment of medical and medication history. This will include the 
determination of whether a patient has a diagnosis of knee OA (Section 8.2.1.1). Height and 
weight measurements will be recorded at the screening visit to calculate BMI (see 
Section 8.2.1.2 and Section 8.2.1.3 for details on height and weight measurements, respectively). 
Demographics will be recorded at the screening visit to characterize the baseline population. 
Eligible patients are required to sign the informed consent form (ICF) prior to undergoing any 
study procedures. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will again be assessed at the baseline visit 
to confirm study eligibility.  
Patient diaries will be distributed to eligible and enrolled patients at the baseline visit or prior to 
the baseline visit if patient’s eligibility for the study has been established. Patients will be trained 
on use of the diary to record daily usage of study-permitted rescue medication in the event of 
breakthrough OA pain. Patients will be instructed to bring the diary to each study visit.  
Randomization will occur for eligible and enrolled patients at the baseline visit (day 1).  
8.2.1.1. 
Determination of Osteoarthritis of the Knee 
Diagnosis of OA of the knee will be based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria 
with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2). The American College of Rheumatology clinical 
and radiographic criteria for the diagnosis of OA of the knee (Altman, 1986) criteria consist of 
the following combinations: 
 Knee pain 
 Osteophytes on radiograph 
 At least 1 of the following 3 features: 
 Age >50 years 
 Stiffness <30 minutes 
 Crepitus 
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) will be measured for use as part of the diagnosis for OA, 
as applicable.  
8.2.1.2. 
Height 
Patients should not be wearing shoes during height assessment. Height will be recorded to the 
nearest 1 cm.  
8.2.1.3. 
Weight 
Body weight will be measured at the screening visit for the BMI calculation and throughout the 
study as a safety procedure at the specified visits (Table 1). Body weight should be measured 
using calibrated scales and will be recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg. Patients should void (empty 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 44 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
bladder) prior to weight assessment and should only be wearing undergarments and should not 
be wearing shoes during weight assessments.  
8.2.2. 
Efficacy Procedures  
8.2.2.1. 
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index 
The WOMAC index is used to assess patients with OA of the knee using 24 parameters and is 
reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score. This index can be used to monitor the course of a 
disease or to determine efficacy of study drugs. Patients will complete the WOMAC full survey 
or the pain subscale (a portion of the full survey) at the time points indicated in Table 1.  
8.2.2.2. 
Patient Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis 
The Patient Global Assessment of OA is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 
5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). Patients will 
complete the assessment scale at the time points indicated in Table 1.  
8.2.3. 
Safety Procedures  
8.2.3.1. 
Vital Signs 
Vital signs include blood pressure, pulse, body temperature, and respiratory rate. Vital signs will 
be obtained in accordance with the study site procedures at the specified visits (Table 1). The 
patient should be resting semi-recumbent for approximately 10 minutes prior to having vital 
signs obtained. Semi-recumbent vital signs include blood pressure and pulse. If at any visit after 
the baseline visit the pulse is less than 45 bpm confirmed in up to 2 measurements, an ECG with 
rhythm strip will be obtained to confirm the heart rate and rhythm.  
8.2.3.2. 
Orthostatic Vital Sign Assessment 
Orthostatic blood pressure and heart rate are measured with the patient lying semi-recumbent for 
10 minutes and after standing for 2 minutes. Prior to starting an assessment of orthostatic blood 
pressure and heart rate, patients should ambulate for at least 5 minutes. This assessment will be 
performed at the specified visits (Table 1).  
In case any of the following criteria are met, up to 2 re-checks (within approximately 5 minutes 
of the original measurement) should be performed (patient should remain standing): 
If the semi-recumbent systolic blood pressure is <160 mm Hg, a decrease in the 2-minute 
standing systolic blood pressure of ≥20 mm Hg or a decrease in the standing diastolic blood 
pressure of ≥10 mm Hg from the semi-recumbent systolic or diastolic blood pressure, 
respectively 
OR 
If the semi-recumbent systolic blood pressure is ≥160 mm Hg, a decrease in the 2-minute 
standing systolic blood pressure of ≥30 mm Hg or a decrease in the standing diastolic blood 
pressure of ≥15 mm Hg from the semi-recumbent systolic or diastolic blood pressure, 
respectively 
OR 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 45 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
An increase in the 2-minute standing heart rate of ≥30 bpm from the semi-recumbent heart rate. 
An AE of orthostatic vital sign change should be reported if the change is confirmed upon the 
repeat tests. 
If the patient is unable to stand for standing blood pressure measurements due to dizziness or 
lightheadedness, the patient is considered to have orthostatic hypotension, which should be 
reported.  
8.2.3.3. 
Physical Examination with Joint Exam 
A full or brief physical examination will be performed according to the site’s procedures at the 
time points in Table 1. Both the full and brief physical examinations will include joint 
examination. The brief physical examination will include assessment of heart, lungs, abdomen, 
peripheral pulses, and skin.  
8.2.3.4. 
Electrocardiogram 
A standard 12-lead ECG will be performed at the time points indicated in Table 1, with the 
patient in the semi-recumbent position for approximately 10 minutes and prior to blood samples 
being drawn. Heart rate will be recorded from the ventricular rate, and the PR/PQ, QRS, and the 
QT and QTc intervals will be recorded. The ECG strips/reports will be retained with the source. 
The following parameters will be recorded in the case report form (CRF): ventricular heart rate, 
PR/PQ, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals.  
8.2.3.5. 
Neurological Examination 
A full or brief neurological examination will be performed at the time points indicated in 
Table 1. Neurological findings at baseline that are not exclusionary should be recorded in the 
medical history. Findings at subsequent visits will be assessed by the investigator to determine if 
these should be recorded as an AE.  
The full neurological examination will cover the following domains: mental status, motor, 
sensory, cranial nerves, reflexes, and coordination/balance. A brief neurological examination will 
include assessment of orientation, cranial nerves, sensory and motor function, and basic reflexes. 
Any clinician at the site qualified to do so may conduct the neurological examination. Whenever 
possible, the same clinician who conducts the baseline neurological examination should continue 
to conduct the examinations on a given patient.  
8.2.3.6. 
Imaging 
Radiographs of patients’ knees, hips, and shoulders will be taken using a standard approach at 
the time points indicated in Table 1. In addition to scheduled imaging, radiographs should be 
considered for worsening joint pain despite treatment with analgesics, which in the opinion of 
the investigator, is inconsistent with the normal progression of OA and lasts at least 2 weeks (or 
less at the discretion of the investigator). The investigator is to consult the sponsor prior to 
scheduling additional imaging.  
Magnetic resonance imaging of the index knee will be performed at the time points indicated in 
Table 1. In addition to scheduled MRIs, an MRI should be considered for worsening joint pain 
despite treatment with analgesics, which in the opinion of the investigator is inconsistent with the 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 46 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
normal progression of OA and lasts at least 2 weeks (or less at the discretion of the investigator), 
and if X-rays are inconclusive. The investigator is to consult the sponsor prior to scheduling 
additional imaging. 
If a patient undergoes a joint replacement surgery, patients will have additional radiographs at 
the time points indicated in Table 2.  
Screening and on-study radiographs of the knees and hips will be evaluated for joint space width 
to identify excessive loss of joint space. In addition, all radiographs and MRI scans will be 
evaluated for the presence of adjudicated arthropathy.  
Detailed procedures will be available in a separate manual provided by the central imaging 
center. Radiographs or MRIs will be sent to a central reader, where the images will be digitized.  
8.2.3.7. 
Joint Pain Questionnaire 
A joint pain questionnaire will be completed by the patient at the time points indicated in 
Table 1. For each knee, hip, and shoulder joint, the patient will be prompted to indicate if he or 
she has experienced pain. A patient report of having experienced pain will serve as a tool to 
prompt further evaluations as deemed necessary by the investigator.  
8.2.3.8. 
End-of-Study Phone Call for Joint Replacement Status Questionnaire 
An end-of-study phone call will be conducted at approximately 52 weeks after the first dose of 
study drug (Table 1). The purpose of the end-of-study phone call is to determine whether a 
patient underwent, is scheduled for, or is on a waiting list to receive joint replacement surgery, or 
whether joint replacement was recommended but the patient elected to defer since his/her last in-
clinic visit. Patients will also be asked to submit pre-operative imaging (X-ray and MRI, if 
available) for adjudication and to provide joint material for histological and molecular analyzes, 
if feasible.  
8.2.3.9. 
Knee Society Score for Joint Replacement Follow-up Only 
The Knee Society Score is an investigator-completed questionnaire that is used to objectively 
measure a patient’s ability to function before (Table 1) and after (Table 2) total knee arthroplasty 
(Insall, 1989). If possible, the assessment should be completed by the same qualified person 
throughout the study. 
8.2.3.10. Laboratory Testing 
Regeneron or its designee will be responsible for PK, ADA, biomarker, 
, and 
pharmacogenetic sample assessments. Other samples may be analyzed by either a central 
laboratory, local laboratories, or at the study sites.  
All samples will be collected before study drug administration (unless otherwise mentioned in 
the Schedule of Events Table [Table 1] and associated footnotes [Section 8.1.1]). Missed tests 
should be reported in the source documents and in the CRF, as appropriate. Central laboratory 
kits will be provided for sample collection and shipment. Detailed instructions for blood sample 
collection are in the laboratory manual provided to study sites. 
Samples for laboratory testing will be collected at visits according to Table 1. Tests will include: 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 47 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Blood Chemistry 
Sodium 
Total protein, serum 
Total bilirubin 
Potassium 
Creatinine 
Total cholesterol* 
Chloride 
Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 
Triglycerides 
Carbon dioxide 
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 
Uric acid 
Calcium 
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 
Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) 
Glucose 
Alkaline phosphatase 
 
Albumin 
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 
 
 
*(low-density lipoprotein [LDL] and high-density lipoprotein [HDL]) 
Hematology 
Hemoglobin 
Differential: 
Hematocrit 
 
Neutrophils 
Red blood cells (RBCs) 
 
Lymphocytes 
White blood cells (WBCs) 
 
Monocytes 
Red cell indices 
 
Basophils 
Platelet count 
 
Eosinophils 
Urinalysis 
Color (optional) 
Glucose 
RBC 
Clarity 
Blood 
Hyaline and other casts 
pH 
Bilirubin 
Bacteria 
Specific gravity 
Leukocyte esterase 
Epithelial cells 
Ketones 
Nitrite 
Crystals 
Protein 
WBC 
Yeast 
Other Laboratory Tests 
Drug (including cannabis and opioids) and alcohol test 
Pregnancy test; urine or serum samples, as indicated 
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (will be tested in women to confirm postmenopausal status) 
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, Glycated hemoglobin) 
High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) 
Abnormal Laboratory Values and Laboratory Adverse Events 
All laboratory values must be reviewed by the investigator or authorized designee. 
Significantly abnormal test results that occur after start of treatment must be repeated to confirm 
the nature and degree of the abnormality. When necessary, appropriate ancillary investigations 
should be initiated. If the abnormality fails to resolve or cannot be explained by events or 
conditions unrelated to the study medication or its administration, the Medical/Study Director 
must be consulted.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 48 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
The clinical significance of an abnormal test value, within the context of the disease under study, 
must be determined by the investigator. 
Criteria for reporting laboratory values as an AE are provided in Section 9.4.5. 
8.2.4. 
Drug Concentration and Measurements 
Samples for drug concentration will be collected at visits listed in Table 1. Instructions for blood 
sample collection will be included in the laboratory manual provided to study sites. 
 
 
8.2.5. 
Anti-Drug Antibody Measurements and Samples 
Samples for ADA measurements will be collected at visits listed in Table 1. Instructions for 
blood sample collection will be included in the laboratory manual provided to study sites. 
 
.  
8.2.6. 
Biomarker, Pharmacodynamic, 
 and Other Research  
8.2.6.1. 
Pharmacodynamic and Biomarker Research 
Serum and plasma pharmacodynamic and biomarker samples will be collected at time points 
according to Table 1. HsCRP will be measured to assess non-specific inflammation. If an 
increase in hsCRP is observed, other inflammatory cytokines may be measured (eg, ILb, IL6, 
TNFa, etc.). Alkaline phosphatase will be measured as part of the laboratory testing and, if an 
increase is observed, bone and collagen markers (CTX-1, P1NP, Osteocalcin, C1M, C3M) may 
be assessed.  
Research assessments may be performed to explore how REGN5069 may modify the perception 
of pain in patients with pain due to OA of the knee. Pharmacodynamic and biomarker 
measurements will be performed using the collected samples to determine effects on biomarkers 
of pain sensation or relevant physiological and pathogenic processes regarding pain and/or pain 
due to OA. The biomarkers studied may be relevant to the pathophysiology of indication target 
engagement, mechanism of action of REGN5069, and/or possible toxicities. If necessary, 
samples may also be used to identify markers associated with AEs.  
RNA sequencing (or other methods used to quantitate RNA expression) may be performed on 
arthroplasty tissue samples collected from any patient who may undergo a joint replacement 
surgery (Table 2) to compare the molecular signature of samples from patients treated with 
REGN5069 relative to placebo. RNA in situ hybridization by RNAscope may also be performed 
on the tissue samples to measure and localize genes identified in the molecular signature by 
RNA sequencing and including but not limited to other genes involved in bone metabolism, 
inflammation, pain, and REGN5069 efficacy and/or safety.  
 
 
 
 
 
  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 49 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
8.2.6.4. 
Collection of Arthroplasty Tissue Samples (Joint Replacement Surgery Only) 
Tissue samples will be collected at the time of the joint arthroplasty surgery (Table 2). Detailed 
procedures for collection, freezing, shipping, and storage of tissue samples will be provided in a 
separate document.  
8.2.6.5. 
Histological Evaluation of Tissue Samples (Joint Replacement Surgery Only) 
A centrally located pathologist will evaluate any slides prepared locally and will oversee 
processing of tissue shipped in formalin. Hematoxylin and eosin, a basic staining for tissue 
morphology, will be performed on all samples. Additional stains to be considered include 
Safranin O/Toluidine blue (stain proteoglycans), Goldner’s trichrome (stains collagen fibers), 
and Alizarin Red S (stains calcium crystals). Immunohistochemistry will be considered but will 
be limited by the formalin fixation. 
8.2.6.6. 
Moticon Digital Insole Device Sub-Study for Gait Assessments 
Only study sites selected for participation in the Moticon sub-study for gait assessments using 
the digital insole device will perform the Moticon-related procedures at the time points according 
to Table 1. This sub-study will enroll approximately 13 patients per treatment group to obtain 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 50 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
data on at least 10 patients per treatment group for a total of approximately 30 patients across the 
entire sub-study. For details on these procedures, participating sites will be provided with a 
Moticon digital insole device manual. 
The principle purpose of this sub-study is to assess functional mobility gait parameters as 
measured by the Moticon insole device in patients with pain due to OA of the knee without an 
analgesic treatment and in the presence of potential analgesic treatment. The study will also 
examine correlations of these gait parameters with the WOMAC pain subscale score.  
9. 
SAFETY DEFINITIONS, REPORTING, AND MONITORING 
9.1. 
Obligations of Investigator 
The investigator must promptly report to the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/EC all 
unanticipated problems involving risks to patients, according to local regulations. This may 
include death from any cause and all serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the use of the 
study drug. It is recommended that all SAEs be reported to the IRB/EC, according to local 
regulations. 
9.2. 
Obligations of Sponsor 
During the course of the study, the sponsor will report in an expedited manner all SAEs that are 
both unexpected and at least reasonably related to the study drug (suspected unexpected serious 
adverse reaction [SUSAR]), to the health authorities, IECs/IRBs as appropriate, and to the 
investigators (in a blinded manner).  
Any AE not listed as an expected event in the Reference Safety Information section of the 
Investigator’s Brochure will be considered as unexpected. Any worsening of or new onset of 
symptoms related to OA that occur during the screening period prior to study drug administration 
will be considered expected.  
In addition, the sponsor will report in an expedited manner all other SAEs to the health 
authorities, according to local regulations. 
At the completion of the study, the sponsor will report all safety observations made during the 
conduct of the study in the clinical study report to health authorities and IECs/IRB, as 
appropriate. 
9.3. 
Definitions 
9.3.1. 
Adverse Event 
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a study drug which may or 
may not have a causal relationship with the study drug. Therefore, an AE is any unfavorable and 
unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease which is 
temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered related to the study 
drug. 
An AE also includes any worsening (ie, any clinically significant change in frequency and/or 
intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 51 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
9.3.2. 
Serious Adverse Event 
An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: 
 Results in death – includes all deaths, even those that appear to be completely 
unrelated to study drug (eg, a car accident in which a patient is a passenger). 
 Is life-threatening – in the view of the investigator, the patient is at immediate risk of 
death at the time of the event. This does not include an AE that, had it occurred in a 
more severe form, might have caused death. 
 Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. 
Inpatient hospitalization is defined as a hospital admission (any duration) or an 
emergency room visit for longer than 24 hours. Prolongation of existing 
hospitalization is defined as a hospital stay that is longer than was originally 
anticipated for the event, or is prolonged due to the development of a new AE, as 
determined by the investigator or treating physician. 
 Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of 
one’s ability to conduct normal life functions).  
 Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect 
 Is an important medical event – Important medical events may not be immediately 
life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the patient or 
may require intervention to prevent one of the other serious outcomes listed above 
(eg, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for allergic bronchospasm; 
blood dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in hospitalization; or development 
of drug dependency or drug abuse). 
Criteria for reporting SAEs must be followed for these events. See Section 9.4 for more 
information on recording and reporting SAEs. 
9.3.3. 
Adverse Events of Special Interest 
An adverse event of special interest (AESI; serious or non-serious) is one of scientific and 
medical concern specific to the sponsor’s product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and 
rapid communication by the investigator to the sponsor can be appropriate. Such an event might 
warrant further investigation in order to characterize and understand it. Depending on the nature 
of the event, rapid communication by the trial sponsor to other parties (eg, regulators) might also 
be warranted (Section 9.4.3). 
9.3.4. 
Infusion Reactions 
Infusion reactions are defined as any relevant AE that occurs during the infusion or within 
2 hours after the infusion is completed. All infusion reactions must be reported as AEs (defined 
in Section 9.4.1) and graded using the grading scales as instructed in Section 9.5.1. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 52 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
9.4. 
Recording and Reporting Adverse Events  
9.4.1. 
Adverse Events 
The investigator (or designee) will record all AEs that occur from the time the informed consent 
is signed until the end of the follow-up period.  
Information on follow-up for AEs is provided in Section 9.4.6. Laboratory, vital signs, or ECG 
abnormalities are to be recorded as AEs as outlined in Section 9.4.5. 
9.4.2. 
Serious Adverse Events 
All SAEs, regardless of assessment of causal relationship to study drug, must be reported to the 
sponsor (or designee) within 24 hours.  
Information not available at the time of the initial report must be documented in a follow-up 
report. Substantiating data such as relevant hospital or medical records and diagnostic test reports 
may also be requested. 
In the event the investigator is informed of an SAE after the patient completes the study, the 
following will apply: 
 SAE with an onset within 30 days of the end of the follow-up period or within 226 
days of last study drug administration if the patient early terminated from the study - 
the SAE will be reported to the sponsor. The investigator should make every effort to 
obtain follow-up information on the outcome until the event is considered chronic 
and/or stable. 
 SAE with an onset day greater than 30 days from the end of the follow-up 
period/early termination visit - only fatal SAEs and those deemed by the investigator 
to be drug-related SAEs will be reported to the sponsor. The investigator should make 
every effort to obtain follow-up information on the outcome of a drug-related SAE 
until the event is considered chronic and/or stable.  
 SAE reported by the patient at the end-of-study phone call and deemed by the 
investigator to be drug-related will be reported to the sponsor. The investigator should 
make every effort to obtain follow-up information on the outcome of a drug-related 
SAE until the event is considered chronic and/or stable. 
9.4.3. 
Other Events that Require Accelerated Reporting to Sponsor 
The following events also require reporting to the sponsor (or designee) within 24 hours of 
learning of the event: 
Symptomatic Overdose of Study Drug: 
Accidental or intentional overdose of at least 
2 times the intended dose of study drug within the intended therapeutic window, if 
associated with an AE. 
Pregnancy: 
Although pregnancy is not considered an AE, it is the responsibility of the 
investigator to report to the sponsor (or designee), within 24 hours of 
identification, any pregnancy occurring in a female or female partner of a male, 
during the study or within 274 days (9 months) of the last dose of study drug. Any 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 53 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
complication of pregnancy affecting a female study patient or female partner of a 
male study patient, and/or fetus and/or newborn that meets the SAE criteria must 
be reported as an SAE. Outcome for all pregnancies should be reported to the 
sponsor.  
Adverse Events of Special Interest: All AESIs, serious and non-serious, must be reported 
within 24 hours of identification using the same reporting process as for SAE 
reporting, per Section 9.4.2. No AESIs have been defined for this study.  
9.4.4. 
Reporting Adverse Events Leading to Withdrawal from the Study 
All AEs that lead to a patient’s withdrawal from the study must be reported to the sponsor’s 
Medical/Study Director within 30 days. 
9.4.5. 
Abnormal Laboratory, Vital Signs, or Electrocardiogram Results 
The criteria for determining whether an abnormal objective test finding should be reported as an 
AE include: 
 the test result is associated with accompanying symptoms, and/or 
 the test result requires additional diagnostic testing or medical/surgical intervention, 
and/or 
 the test result leads to a change in dosing (outside of protocol-stipulated dose 
adjustments), discontinuation from the study, significant additional concomitant drug 
treatment, or other therapy 
Contact the Medical/Study Director in the event the investigator feels that an abnormal test 
finding should be reported as an AE, although it does not meet any of the above criteria. 
Repeating an abnormal test, in the absence of any of the above conditions, does not constitute an 
AE. Any abnormal test result that is determined to be an error does not require reporting as an 
AE. 
Evaluation of severity of laboratory abnormalities will be assessed according to the scale 
outlined in Section 9.5.1. 
9.4.6. 
Follow-up 
Adverse event information will be collected until the patient’s last study visit. 
Serious adverse event information will be collected until the event is considered chronic and/or 
stable. 
9.5. 
Evaluation of Severity and Causality 
9.5.1. 
Evaluation of Severity 
The severity of AEs will be graded according to the following scale: 
 Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the patient’s normal functioning 
level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief 
of symptoms, but may be given because of personality of the patient. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 54 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. 
It is uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. 
 Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and is a 
definite hazard to the patient’s health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or 
patient hospitalized. 
If a laboratory value is considered an AE, its severity should be based on the degree of 
physiological impairment the value indicates. 
Infusion Reactions 
The severity of infusion reactions will be graded according to the following scale (semi-colon 
indicates “or” within description of the grade): 
 Mild: Mild transient reaction; infusion interruption not indicated; intervention not 
indicated. 
 Moderate: Therapy or infusion interruption indicated but responds promptly to 
symptomatic treatment (eg, antihistamines, NSAIDs, narcotics, IV fluids); 
prophylactic medications indicated for ≤24 hours.  
 Severe:  Prolonged (eg, not rapidly responsive to symptomatic medication and/or 
brief interruption of infusion); recurrence of symptoms following initial 
improvement; hospitalization indicated for clinical sequelae; life-threatening 
consequences; urgent intervention indicated; death. 
9.5.2. 
Evaluation of Causality 
Relationship of Adverse Events to Study Drug: 
The relationship of AEs to study drug will be assessed by the “blinded” investigator, and will be 
a clinical decision based on all available information. The following question will be addressed: 
Is there a reasonable possibility that the AE may have been caused by the study drug? 
The possible answers are: 
 Not Related: There is no reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused 
by the study drug 
 Related: There is a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the 
study drug 
The investigator should justify the causality assessment of each SAE. 
A list of factors to consider when assessing the relationship of AEs to study drug is provided 
below. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. 
Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the study drug? 
No: 
 due to external causes such as environmental factors or other treatment(s) being 
administered 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 55 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 due to the patient’s disease state or clinical condition 
 do not follow a reasonable temporal sequence following the time of administration of 
the dose of study drug 
 do not reappear or worsen when dosing with study drug is resumed 
 are not a suspected response to the study drug based upon preclinical data or prior 
clinical data 
Yes: 
 could not be explained by environmental factors or other treatment(s) being 
administered 
 could not be explained by the patient’s disease state or clinical condition 
 follow a reasonable temporal sequence following the time of administration of the 
dose of study drug  
 resolve or improve after discontinuation of study drug  
 reappear or worsen when dosing with study drug  
 are known or suspected to be a response to the study drug based upon preclinical data 
or prior clinical data 
Relationship of Adverse Events to Study Conduct: 
The relationship of AEs to study conduct will be assessed by the blinded investigator, and will be 
a clinical decision based on all available information. The following question will be addressed: 
Is there a reasonable possibility that the AE may have been caused by study conduct? 
The possible answers are: 
 Not Related: There is no reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused 
by study conduct 
 Related: There is a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by 
study conduct 
The investigator should justify the causality assessment of each SAE. 
A list of factors to consider when assessing the relationship of AEs to study conduct is provided 
below. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. 
Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the study conduct? 
No: 
 due to external causes such as environmental factors or other treatment(s) being 
administered 
 due to the patient’s disease state or clinical condition 
 do not follow a reasonable temporal sequence following the course of the study 
 do not reappear or worsen when dosing with study participation is resumed 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 56 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Yes: 
 could not be explained by environmental factors or other treatment(s) being 
administered 
 could not be explained by the patient’s disease state or clinical condition 
 follow a reasonable temporal sequence following the course of the study 
 resolve or improve after discontinuation from study participation 
 reappear or worsen when study participation is resumed 
9.6. 
Safety Monitoring 
The investigator will monitor the safety of study patient at his/her site(s) as per the requirements 
of this protocol and consistent with current Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Any questions or 
concerns should be discussed with the sponsor in a timely fashion. The sponsor will monitor the 
safety data from across all study sites. The Medical/Study Director will have primary 
responsibility for the emerging safety profile of the compound, but will be supported by other 
departments (eg, Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management; Biostatistics and Data 
Management). Safety monitoring will be performed on an ongoing basis (eg, individual review 
of SAEs) and on a periodic cumulative aggregate basis. 
9.7. 
Investigator Alert Notification 
Regeneron (or designee) will inform all investigators participating in this clinical trial, as well as 
in any other clinical trial using the same investigational drug, of any SAE that meets the relevant 
requirements for expedited reporting (an AE that is serious, unexpected based on the reference 
safety information in the Investigator’s Brochure, and has a reasonable suspected causal 
relationship to the study drug). 
10. 
STATISTICAL PLAN 
This section provides the basis for the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the study. The SAP may 
be revised during the study to accommodate amendments to the clinical study protocol and to 
make changes to adapt to unexpected issues in study execution and data that may affect the 
planned analyses. The final SAP will be issued before the database is locked. Analyses related to 
the Moticon sub-study will not be in the scope of the final SAP.  
Analysis variables are listed in Section 4.  
10.1. 
Statistical Hypothesis  
The null hypotheses of no treatment difference between a REGN5069 dose and placebo against 
an alternative hypothesis of some treatment difference in change from baseline to week 12 in 
WOMAC pain subscale, physical function subscale, and Patient Global Assessment scores will 
be tested for each dose. Multiplicity adjustment for the 6 null hypotheses will be made using 
sequentially rejective multiple test procedure to control Type I error rate at 2-sided 0.05 level in 
the following order: 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 57 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 H1: No treatment difference between 1000 mg REGN5069 and placebo groups in 
change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC pain subscale score 
 H2: No treatment difference between 100 mg REGN5069 and placebo groups in 
change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC pain subscale score 
 H3: No treatment difference between 1000 mg REGN5069 and placebo groups in 
change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC physical function subscale score 
 H4: No treatment difference between 100 mg REGN5069 and placebo groups in 
change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC physical function subscale score 
 H5: No treatment difference between 1000 mg REGN5069 and placebo groups in 
change from baseline to week 12 in Patient Global Assessment score 
 H6: No treatment difference between 100 mg REGN5069 and placebo groups in 
change from baseline to week 12 in Patient Global Assessment score 
If at any step a null hypothesis is not rejected, the testing will stop and no further hypothesis in 
the order will be tested. The details will be provided in the SAP.  
10.2. 
Justification of Sample Size 
Up to approximately 240 patients (80 per treatment group) will be randomized to 3 treatment 
groups in a 1:1:1 allocation. Assuming a standard deviation (SD) of 2.3, 80 patients per treatment 
group will provide approximately 80% power to detect a treatment difference of 1.1 between the 
REGN5069 dose and the matching placebo in change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC pain 
subscale (using a significance level of 0.05, 2-sided t-test and assuming a dropout rate of 15% 
[6% due to lack of efficacy or AEs, and 9% due to other reasons]). 
10.3. 
Analysis Sets  
10.3.1. 
Efficacy Analysis Sets 
The full analysis set (FAS) will include all randomized patients and will be based on the 
treatment allocated (as randomized). Efficacy endpoints will be analyzed using the FAS.  
10.3.2. 
Safety Analysis Set 
The safety analysis set (SAF) will include all randomized patients who received any study drug 
and is based on the treatment received. Treatment compliance/administration and all safety 
variables will be analyzed using the SAF.  
10.3.3. 
Per Protocol Set 
The per protocol set (PPS) will include all randomized patients who complete the 12-week 
treatment period and who do not have major protocol deviations through week 12. The PPS will 
be used for sensitivity analyses for the primary and selected secondary endpoints, as will be 
defined in the SAP.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 58 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
10.3.4. 
Pharmacokinetic Analysis Sets 
The PK analysis set will include all treated patients who received any study drug and who had at 
least 1 non-missing drug concentration measurement following the first dose of study drug.  
10.3.5. 
Anti-Drug Antibody Analysis Sets 
The ADA analysis set will include all treated patients who received any study drug and who had 
at least 1 non-missing ADA result following the first dose of study drug. 
10.4. 
Statistical Methods  
For continuous variables, descriptive statistics will include the following information:  the 
number of patients reflected in the calculation (n), mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, 
and maximum.  
For categorical or ordinal data, frequencies and percentages will be displayed for each category. 
10.4.1. 
Patient Disposition 
The following will be provided: 
 The total number of screened patients: met the inclusion criteria regarding the target 
indication and signed the ICF 
 The total number of randomized patients: received a randomization number 
 The total number of patients in each analysis set (eg, FAS, provided in Section 10.3) 
 The total number of patients who discontinued the study, and the reasons for 
discontinuation 
 A listing of patients treated but not randomized, patients randomized but not treated, 
and patients randomized but not treated as randomized 
 A listing of patients prematurely discontinued from treatment, along with reasons for 
discontinuation 
10.4.2. 
Demography and Baseline Characteristics 
Baseline demographic, disease characteristics, and exposure to study drug will be summarized 
descriptively by treatment groups using descriptive statistics. Continuous variables will be 
summarized with mean, median, and SD, minimum, and maximum. Categorical variables will be 
summarized with counts and percentages. 
10.4.3. 
Efficacy Analyses 
10.4.3.1. Primary Efficacy Analysis 
The primary estimand for the primary objective is the difference in means between both 
REGN5069 dose + protocol-defined rescue medication and placebo + protocol-defined rescue 
medication in the change from baseline to week 12 in the WOMAC pain subscale score of 
patients in the FAS. All collected data will be included in the analysis regardless of whether 
prohibited medication was taken. Missing values will be imputed with the multiple imputation 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 59 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
approach, where intermediate missing data will be first imputed using the Markov Chain Monte 
Carlo method and then the remaining missing data with a monotone missing pattern will be 
imputed with a regression method. The regression model will adjust for treatment, randomization 
strata, and baseline score.  For patients who drop out due to lack of efficacy or AEs, each 
imputed value will be further adjusted by subtracting the mean change from baseline to the 
respective post-baseline time point calculated from patients in the same treatment group with 
observed data at that time point.  For each complete dataset, the primary efficacy endpoint of 
change from baseline to week 12 in WOMAC pain subscale score will be analyzed using 
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which will include treatment, randomization strata, 
and baseline score as covariate.  The least-squares means estimates, as well as the difference of 
the estimates between each dose and placebo with standard error, p-values, and 95% confidence 
intervals will be provided by combining results from the analyses of the multiple imputed 
datasets using Rubin’s formulae.  Further details will be provided in the SAP.  
10.4.3.2. Secondary Efficacy Analysis 
The continuous secondary endpoints will be analyzed similarly as specified in Section 10.4.3.1.  
For the analyses of categorical secondary endpoints, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified 
by the K-L category (2-3 vs 4) will be used with missing data considered as non-response. The 
continuous secondary endpoints will be analyzed similarly as specified in Section 10.4.3.1.  
10.4.4. 
Safety Analysis 
The safety data including TEAEs and other safety information (clinical laboratory evaluations, 
vital signs and 12-lead ECG) will be summarized by treatment groups.  
Thresholds for potentially clinically significant values (PCSVs) in laboratory parameters and 
vital signs will be defined by the sponsor and be in effect at the time of the final SAP approval.  
10.4.4.1. Adverse Events 
Definitions 
For safety variables, 3 observation periods are defined: 
 The pre-treatment period is defined as the time from signing the ICF to before the 
first dose of study drug. 
 The treatment period is defined as the day from first dose of study drug to the last 
dose of study drug + 4 weeks (week 12) 
 The post-treatment period is defined as the time after the treatment period (after 
week 12). 
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as those that are not present at baseline or 
represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the treatment period. 
Analysis 
All AEs reported in this study will be coded using the currently available version of the Medical 
Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®). Coding will be to lowest level terms. The 
verbatim text, the preferred term (PT), and the primary system organ class (SOC) will be listed.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 60 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Summaries of all TEAEs by treatment group will include: 
 The number (n) and percentage (%) of patients with at least 1 TEAE by SOC and PT 
 TEAEs by severity (according to the grading scale outlined in Section 9.5.1), 
presented by SOC and PT 
 TEAEs by relationship to treatment (related, not related), presented by SOC and PT 
Deaths and other SAEs will be listed and summarized by treatment group. 
Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to permanent treatment discontinuation will be listed 
and summarized by treatment group. 
10.4.4.2. Other Safety 
Vital Signs 
Vital signs (temperature, pulse, blood pressure, and respiration rate) will be summarized by 
baseline and change from baseline to each scheduled assessment time with descriptive statistics. 
Laboratory Tests 
Laboratory test results will be summarized by baseline and change from baseline to each 
scheduled assessment time with descriptive statistics. 
Number and percentage of patients with a PCSV at any post-randomization time point will be 
summarized for each clinical laboratory test.  
Shift tables based on baseline normal/abnormal and other tabular and graphical methods may be 
used to present the results for laboratory tests of interest. 
Listings will be provided with flags indicating the out-of-laboratory range values. 
Imaging 
Change from baseline (ie, screening visit) in joint space width of the knees and hips will be 
summarized by treatment group over time. The number and percentages with images requiring 
arthropathy adjudication, as well as the number and percentage of patients with confirmed 
adjudicated arthropathy, will be summarized by treatment group. Patient listings of cases 
confirmed by adjudication will also be provided. 
10.4.4.3. Treatment Exposure 
Because of the half-life of the biologic being studied, the duration of exposure (in days) during 
the study will be presented by treatment group and calculated as: 
 (Date of last administration of study drug - date of the first study drug administration 
after randomization) + 28  
The number and percentage of patients randomized and exposed to double-blinded study drug 
will be presented by specific time period for each treatment group. The time periods will be 
specified in the final SAP.  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 61 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
10.4.4.4. Treatment Compliance 
Overall treatment compliance is defined as the actual dose administered compared to the 
prescribed dose of treatment during the treatment phase up to treatment discontinuation. It is 
calculated according to the following formula: 
100 * total dose administered /prescribed dose. 
The total number of doses will be summarized by treatment groups. 
10.4.5. 
Pharmacokinetics 
10.4.5.1. Analysis of Drug Concentration Data 
Summaries of trough concentrations (Ctrough) of functional REGN5069 will be presented by 
nominal time point and dose. Plots of individual Ctrough will be presented by actual day (linear 
and log scales). Plots of mean and median Ctrough will be presented by nominal day (linear and 
log scale).  
10.4.5.2. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Analyses 
Population PK and exposure-response analyses for biomarkers, efficacy, and safety endpoints 
may be performed, as appropriate, and presented in separate reports. 
10.4.6. 
Analysis of Anti-Drug Antibody Data 
Listings of ADA positivity and titers presented by patient, time point, and treatment group will 
be provided. Prevalence of treatment-emergent and treatment-boosted ADA response will be 
assessed as absolute occurrence (N) and percent of patients (%), grouped by treatment group. 
Plots of drug concentrations will be examined and the influence of ADAs on individual PK 
profiles evaluated. Assessment of impact of ADAs on safety may be provided. 
Anti-drug antibody parameters include status (positive or negative) and titer as follows:  
 Treatment emergent - defined as any post-dose ADA positive response when baseline 
results are negative or missing. 
 Treatment boosted - defined as any post-dose ADA response that is at least 9-fold 
over baseline titer levels when baseline results are positive 
 Titer values 
 Titer category for patients, by patient’s maximal titer value: 
o Low (titer <1,000) 
o Moderate (1,000≤ titer ≤10,000) 
o High (titer >10,000) 
10.5. 
Interim Analysis 
No formal interim analysis is planned for the study. The unblinded primary efficacy analysis will 
be conducted when 12-week data are available for all randomized patients. No individual 
treatment assignments will be unblinded to personnel directly involved with the conduct of the 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 62 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
study until after the final database lock. The unblinded summarized results based on 12-week 
data will be disclosed.  
10.6. 
Additional Statistical Data Handling Conventions 
General rules for handling missing data:  
 Rules for handling missing data for efficacy assessments will be provided in the final 
SAP 
 If the start date of an AE or concomitant medication is incomplete or missing, it will 
be assumed to have occurred on or after the intake of study drug, except if an 
incomplete date (eg, month and year) clearly indicates that the event started prior to 
treatment. If the partial date indicates the same month or year of the intake of study 
drug date, then the start date by the study drug intake date will be imputed; otherwise, 
the missing day or month by the first day or the first month will be imputed.  
 No imputations for missing laboratory data, ECG data, vital sign data, or physical 
examination data will be made. 
Visit windows: 
 Assessments taken outside of protocol allowable windows will be displayed 
according to the CRF assessment recorded by the investigator. 
Unscheduled assessments: 
 Extra assessments (laboratory data or vital signs associated with non-protocol clinical 
visits or obtained in the course of investigating or managing AEs) will be included in 
listings, but not summaries. If more than 1 laboratory value is available for a given 
visit, the first observation will be used in summaries and all observations will be 
presented in listings. 
10.7. 
Statistical Considerations Surrounding the Premature Termination 
of a Study 
If the study is terminated prematurely, only those parameters required for the development 
program and/or reporting to regulatory authorities will be summarized. Investigator and sponsor 
responsibilities surrounding the premature termination of a study are presented in Section 16.1. 
11. 
DATA MANAGEMENT AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 
11.1. 
Data Management 
A data management plan specifying all relevant aspects of data processing for the study, 
including data validation will be maintained and stored at Regeneron (Sponsor). 
A medical coding plan will specify the processes and the dictionary used for coding. All data 
coding (eg, AEs, baseline findings, medication, medical history/surgical history) will be done 
using internationally recognized and accepted dictionaries. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 63 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
The CRF data for this study will be collected with an electronic data capture (EDC) tool called 
Medidata RAVE.  
11.2. 
Electronic Systems 
Electronic systems that may be used to process and/or collect data in this study will include the 
following: 
 IWRS system – randomization, study drug supply 
 EDC system – data capture – Medidata Rave 
 Statistical Analysis System (SAS) – statistical review and analysis 
 Pharmacovigilance safety database 
 Patient diary 
 Moticon wearable insole device (for use at selected sites only) 
12. 
STUDY MONITORING  
12.1. 
Monitoring of Study Sites 
The study monitor and/or designee (eg, CRO monitor) will visit each site prior to enrollment of 
the first patient, and periodically during the study. This study will use the principles of risk-based 
monitoring (ICH). This means that the number of visits for any given site may vary based on site 
risk indicators. The investigator must allow study-related monitoring. 
The study monitors will perform ongoing source data review to verify that data recorded in the 
CRF by authorized site personnel are accurate, complete, and verifiable from source documents, 
that the safety and rights of patients are being protected, and that the study is being conducted in 
accordance with the current approved protocol version and any other study agreements, ICH 
GCP, and all applicable regulatory requirements.  
12.2. 
Source Document Requirements 
Investigators are required to prepare and maintain adequate and accurate patient records (source 
documents). The site is responsible for ensuring quality within their records and systems and is 
accountable for ensuring that all source data and CRF data are timely, accurate, and complete. 
The investigator must keep all source documents on file with the CRF (throughout this protocol, 
CRF refers to either a paper CRF or an electronic CRF). Case report forms and source 
documents must be available at all times for inspection by authorized representatives of the 
sponsor and regulatory authorities. 
12.3. 
Case Report Form Requirements 
Study data obtained during the course of the clinical study will be recorded on electronic CRFs 
within the EDC system by trained site personnel. All required CRFs must be completed for each 
patient enrolled in the study. The investigator must ensure the accuracy, completeness, and 
timeliness of the data reported to the sponsor in the CRFs. After review of the clinical data for 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 64 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
each patient, the investigator must provide an electronic signature. A copy of each patient CRF 
casebook is to be retained by the investigator as part of the study record and must be available at 
all times for inspection by authorized representatives of the sponsor and regulatory authorities. 
Corrections to the CRF will be entered in the CRF by the investigator or an authorized designee. 
All changes, including date and person performing corrections, will be available via the audit 
trail, which is part of the EDC system. For corrections made via data queries, a reason for any 
alteration must be provided. 
13. 
AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS  
This study may be patient to a quality assurance audit or inspection by the sponsor or regulatory 
authorities. Should this occur, the investigator is responsible for: 
 Informing the sponsor of a planned inspection by the authorities as soon as 
notification is received, and authorizing the sponsor’s participation in the inspection 
 Providing access to all necessary facilities, study data, and documents for the 
inspection or audit 
 Communicating any information arising from inspection by the regulatory authorities 
to the sponsor immediately 
 Taking all appropriate measures requested by the sponsor to resolve the problems 
found during the audit or inspection 
Documents subject to audit or inspection include but are not limited to all source documents, 
CRFs, medical records, correspondence, ICFs, IRB/EC files, documentation of certification and 
quality control of supporting laboratories, and records relevant to the study maintained in any 
supporting pharmacy facilities. Conditions of study material storage are also subject to 
inspection. In addition, representatives of the sponsor may observe the conduct of any aspect of 
the clinical study or its supporting activities both within and outside of the investigator's 
institution. 
In all instances, the confidentiality of the data must be respected. 
14. 
ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS 
14.1. 
Good Clinical Practice Statement  
It is the responsibility of both the sponsor and the investigator(s) to ensure that this clinical study 
will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the 
Declaration of Helsinki, and that are consistent with the ICH guidelines for GCP and applicable 
regulatory requirements. 
14.2. 
Informed Consent 
The principles of informed consent are described in ICH guidelines for GCP. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 65 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
The ICF used by the investigator must be reviewed and approved by the sponsor prior to 
submission to the appropriate IRB/EC. A copy of the IRB/EC-approved ICF and documentation 
of approval must be provided to the sponsor before study drug will be shipped to the study site. 
It is the responsibility of the investigator or designee (if acceptable by local regulations) to obtain 
written informed consent from each patient prior to his/her participation in the study and after the 
aims, methods, objectives, and potential hazards of the study have been explained to the patient 
in language that he/she can understand. The ICF should be signed and dated by the patient and 
by the investigator or authorized designee who reviewed the ICF with the patient.  
 Patients who can write but cannot read will have the ICF read to them before signing 
and dating the ICF. 
 Patients who can understand but who can neither write nor read will have the ICF 
read to them in presence of an impartial witness, who will sign and date the ICF to 
confirm that informed consent was given. 
The original ICF must be retained by the investigator as part of the patient’s study record, and a 
copy of the signed ICF must be given to the patient. 
If new safety information results in significant changes in the risk/benefit assessment, the ICF 
must be reviewed and updated appropriately. All study patients must be informed of the new 
information and provide their written consent if they wish to continue in the study. The original 
signed revised ICF must be maintained in the patient’s study record and a copy must be given to 
the patient.  
14.3. 
Patients Confidentiality and Data Protection 
The investigator must take all appropriate measures to ensure that the anonymity of each study 
patient will be maintained. Patients should be identified by a patient identification number only, 
on CRFs or other documents submitted to the sponsor. Documents that will not be submitted to 
the sponsor (eg, signed ICF) must be kept in strict confidence. 
The patient’s and investigator's personal data, which may be included in the sponsor database, 
will be treated in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The sponsor shall take all 
appropriate measures to safeguard and prevent access to this data by any unauthorized third 
party. 
14.4. 
Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee 
An appropriately constituted IRB/EC, as described in ICH guidelines for GCP, must review and 
approve: 
 The protocol, ICF, and any other materials to be provided to the patients 
(eg, advertising) before any patient may be enrolled in the study 
 Any amendment or modification to the study protocol or ICF before implementation, 
unless the change is necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard to the patient, in 
which case the IRB/EC should be informed as soon as possible  
 Ongoing studies on an annual basis or at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk  
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 66 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
In addition, the IRB/EC should be informed of any event likely to affect the safety of patients or 
the continued conduct of the clinical study. 
A copy of the IRB/EC approval letter with a current list of the IRB/EC members and their 
functions must be received by the sponsor prior to shipment of drug supplies to the investigator. 
The approval letter should include the study number and title, the documents reviewed, and the 
date of the review. 
Records of the IRB/EC review and approval of all study documents (including approval of 
ongoing studies) must be kept on file by the investigator. 
14.5. 
Clinical Study Data Transparency 
Final study results will be published on a public clinical trial website according to applicable 
local guidelines and regulations. Treatment codes will be disseminated to each investigation site 
after the study results are posted on a clinical trial registry. 
15. 
PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS 
The sponsor may not implement a change in the design of the protocol or ICF without an 
IRB/EC-approved amendment. Where required per local regulations regulatory authority, 
approval will also be sought. 
16. 
PREMATURE TERMINATION OF THE STUDY OR 
CLOSE-OUT OF A SITE 
16.1. 
Premature Termination of the Study 
The sponsor has the right to terminate the study prematurely. Reasons may include efficacy, 
safety, or futility, among others. Should the sponsor decide to terminate the study, the 
investigator(s) will be notified in writing. 
16.2. 
Close-out of a Site 
The sponsor and the investigator have the right to close-out a site prematurely. 
Investigator’s Decision 
The investigator must notify the sponsor of a desire to close-out a site in writing, providing at 
least 30 days’ notice. The final decision should be made through mutual agreement with the 
sponsor. Both parties will arrange the close-out procedures after review and consultation. 
Sponsor’s Decision 
The sponsor will notify the investigator(s) of a decision to close-out a study site in writing. 
Reasons may include the following, among others:  
 The investigator has received all items and information necessary to perform the 
study, but has not enrolled any patient within a reasonable period of time 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 67 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 The investigator has violated any fundamental obligation in the study agreement, 
including but not limited to, breach of this protocol (and any applicable amendments), 
breach of the applicable laws and regulations, or breach of any applicable ICH 
guidelines  
 The total number of patients required for the study are enrolled earlier than expected 
In all cases, the appropriate IRB/EC and Health Authorities must be informed according to 
applicable regulatory requirements, and adequate consideration must be given to the protection 
of the patients’ interests. 
17. 
STUDY DOCUMENTATION 
17.1. 
Certification of Accuracy of Data 
A declaration assuring the accuracy and content of the data recorded on the CRF must be signed 
electronically by the investigator. This signed declaration accompanies each set of patient final 
CRF that will be provided to the sponsor. 
17.2. 
Retention of Records 
The investigator must retain all essential study documents, including ICFs, source documents, 
investigator copies of CRFs, and drug accountability records for at least 15 years following the 
completion or discontinuation of the study, or longer, if a longer period is required by relevant 
regulatory authorities. The investigator must obtain written approval from the sponsor before 
discarding or destroying any essential study documents during the retention period following 
study completion or discontinuation. Records must be destroyed in a manner that ensures 
confidentiality. 
If the investigator's personal situation is such that archiving can no longer be ensured, the 
investigator must inform the sponsor (written notification) and the relevant records will be 
transferred to a mutually agreed-upon destination.  
18. 
DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE 
In accordance with ICH E6, the sponsor is responsible for quality assurance to ensure that the 
study is conducted and the data generated, recorded, and reported in compliance with the 
protocol, GCP, and any applicable regulatory requirement(s). The planned quality assurance and 
quality control procedures for the study are summarized.  
Data Management 
The sponsor is responsible for the data management of this study including quality checking of 
the data (Section 11.1). 
Study Monitoring 
The investigator must allow study-related monitoring, IRB/EC review, audits, and inspections 
from relevant health regulatory authorities, and provide direct access to source data documents 
(Section 12.1, Section 12.2, and Section 13). 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 68 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
The study monitors will perform ongoing source data review to verify that data recorded in the 
CRF by authorized site personnel are accurate, complete, and verifiable from source documents, 
that the safety and rights of patients are being protected, and that the study is being conducted in 
accordance with the current approved protocol version and any other study agreements, ICH 
GCP, and all applicable regulatory requirements (Section 12.1).  
All patient data collected during the study will be recorded on paper or electronic CRFs unless 
the data are transmitted to the sponsor or designee electronically (eg, laboratory data). The 
investigator is responsible for affirming that data entries in the CRF are accurate and correct by 
electronically signing a declaration that accompanies each set of patient final CRF (Section 12.3 
and Section 17.1).  
Study Documentation 
The investigator must maintain accurate documentation (source data) that supports the 
information entered in the CRF (Section 12.2).  
The investigator will retain all records and documents, including signed ICFs, pertaining to the 
conduct of this study for at least 15 years after study completion, unless local regulations or 
institutional policies require a longer retention period. No records may be destroyed during the 
retention period without the written approval of the sponsor. No records may be transferred to 
another location or party without written notification to the sponsor (Section 17.2).  
19. 
CONFIDENTIALITY 
Confidentiality of information is provided as a separate agreement. 
20. 
FINANCING AND INSURANCE  
Financing and insurance information is provided as a separate agreement. 
21. 
PUBLICATION POLICY  
Publication rights and procedures will be outlined in a separate clinical study agreement. 
22. 
REFERENCES 
Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for 
the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. 
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. 
Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29(8):1039-49. 
Baloh RH, Gorodinsky A, Golden JP, Tansey MG, Keck CL, Popescu NC, et al. GFRalpha3 is 
an orphan member of the GDNF/neurturin/persephin receptor family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 
1998a; 95(10):5801-6. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 69 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Baloh RH, Tansey MG, Lampe PA, Fahrner TJ, Enomoto H, Simburger KS, et al. Artemin, a 
novel member of the GDNF ligand family, supports peripheral and central neurons and signals 
through the GFRalpha3-RET receptor complex. Neuron 1998b; 21(6):1291-302. 
Baudet C, Mikaels A, Westphal H, Johansen J, Johansen TE, Ernfors P. Positive and negative 
interactions of GDNF, NTN and ART in developing sensory neuron subpopulations, and their 
collaboration with neurotrophins. Development 2000; 127(20):4335-44. 
Bespalov MM, Saarma M. GDNF family receptor complexes are emerging drug targets. Trends 
Pharmacol Sci 2007; 28(2):68-74. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov. Published Updated Accessed  
Ceyhan GO, Bergmann F, Kadihasanoglu M, Erkan M, Park W, Hinz U, et al. The neurotrophic 
factor artemin influences the extent of neural damage and growth in chronic pancreatitis. Gut 
2007; 56(4):534-44. 
Deshpande BR, Katz JN, Solomon DH, Yelin EH, Hunter DJ, Messier SP, et al. Number of 
Persons With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in the US: Impact of Race and Ethnicity, Age, 
Sex, and Obesity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 68(12):1743-50. 
Durbec P, Marcos-Gutierrez CV, Kilkenny C, Grigoriou M, Wartiowaara K, Suvanto P, et al. 
GDNF signalling through the Ret receptor tyrosine kinase. Nature 1996; 381(6585):789-93. 
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. 
Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 248):13-4. 
Jing S, Yu Y, Fang M, Hu Z, Holst PL, Boone T, et al. GFRalpha-2 and GFRalpha-3 are two 
new receptors for ligands of the GDNF family. J Biol Chem 1997; 272(52):33111-7. 
Kingsbury SR, Gross HJ, Isherwood G, Conaghan PG. Osteoarthritis in Europe: impact on health 
status, work productivity and use of pharmacotherapies in five European countries. 
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014; 53(5):937-47. 
Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, et al. Estimates of the 
prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis 
Rheum 2008; 58(1):26-35. 
Mabbott NA, Baillie JK, Brown H, Freeman TC, Hume DA. An expression atlas of human 
primary cells: inference of gene function from coexpression networks. BMC Genomics 2013; 
14(632. 
Macdonald LE, Karow M, Stevens S, Auerbach W, Poueymirou WT, Yasenchak J, et al. Precise 
and in situ genetic humanization of 6 Mb of mouse immunoglobulin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 
U S A 2014; 111(14):5147-52. 
Maiese K. Picking a bone with WISP1 (CCN4): new strategies against degenerative joint 
disease. J Transl Sci 2016; 1(3):83-5. 
Malfait AM, Schnitzer TJ. Towards a mechanism-based approach to pain management in 
osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013; 9(11):654-64. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 70 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Murota H, Izumi M, Abd El-Latif MI, Nishioka M, Terao M, Tani M, et al. Artemin causes 
hypersensitivity to warm sensation, mimicking warmth-provoked pruritus in atopic dermatitis. J 
Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 130(3):671-82.e4. 
Murphy AJ, Macdonald LE, Stevens S, Karow M, Dore AT, Pobursky K, et al. Mice with 
megabase humanization of their immunoglobulin genes generate antibodies as efficiently as 
normal mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111(14):5153-8. 
Murray CJ, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, Birbeck G, Burstein R, Chou D, et al. The state of US health, 
1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. Jama 2013; 310(6):591-608. 
Naveilhan P, Baudet C, Mikaels A, Shen L, Westphal H, Ernfors P. Expression and regulation of 
GFRalpha3, a glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S 
A 1998; 95(3):1295-300. 
Network EMCSaI. 2012  Musculoskeletal Health in Europe: Report v5.0. Vol. 5(Issue). 
Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF, Jr., Bock SA, Branum A, et al. 
Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--Second 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network 
symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117(2):391-7. 
Shinoda M, Takeda M, Honda K, Maruno M, Katagiri A, Satoh-Kuriwada S, et al. Involvement 
of peripheral artemin signaling in tongue pain: possible mechanism in burning mouth syndrome. 
Pain 2015; 156(12):2528-37. 
Treanor JJ, Goodman L, de Sauvage F, Stone DM, Poulsen KT, Beck CD, et al. Characterization 
of a multicomponent receptor for GDNF. Nature 1996; 382(6586):80-3. 
Trupp M, Scott R, Whittemore SR, Ibanez CF. Ret-dependent and -independent mechanisms of 
glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in neuronal cells. J Biol Chem 1999; 
274(30):20885-94. 
Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with 
disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic 
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380(9859):2163-96. 
Worby CA, Vega QC, Chao HH, Seasholtz AF, Thompson RC, Dixon JE. Identification and 
characterization of GFRalpha-3, a novel Co-receptor belonging to the glial cell line-derived 
neurotrophic receptor family. J Biol Chem 1998; 273(6):3502-8. 
Yang X, Ambrogelly A. Enlarging the repertoire of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies platforms: 
domesticating half molecule exchange to produce stable IgG4 and IgG1 bispecific antibodies. 
Curr Opin Biotechnol 2014; 30(225-9. 
Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, et al. OARSI 
recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of 
existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthritis 
Cartilage 2007; 15(9):981-1000. 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 71 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
23. 
INVESTIGATOR’S AGREEMENT 
I have read the attached protocol: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-
Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of REGN5069 in Patients with Pain due to 
Osteoarthritis of the Knee and agree to abide by all provisions set forth therein. 
I agree to comply with the current International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Good 
Clinical Practice and the laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines of the community, country, 
state, or locality relating to the conduct of the clinical study. 
I also agree that persons debarred from conducting or working on clinical studies by any court or 
regulatory agency will not be allowed to conduct or work on studies for the sponsor or a 
partnership in which the sponsor is involved. I will immediately disclose it in writing to the 
sponsor if any person who is involved in the study is debarred, or if any proceeding for 
debarment is pending, or, to the best of my knowledge, threatened. 
This document contains confidential information of the sponsor, which must not be disclosed to 
anyone other than the recipient study staff and members of the IRB/EC. I agree to ensure that 
this information will not be used for any purpose other than the evaluation or conduct of the 
clinical investigation without the prior written consent of the sponsor. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Signature of Investigator) 
 
(Date) 
 
 
 
(Printed Name) 
 
 
 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Clinical Study Protocol 
 
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 
Page 72 of 72 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
SIGNATURE OF SPONSOR’S RESPONSIBLE OFFICERS 
(Medical/Study Director, Regulatory Representative, Clinical Study Leader, and 
Biostatistician) 
To the best of my knowledge, this report accurately describes the conduct of the study. 
Study Title: 
 A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study to 
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of REGN5069 in Patients with Pain due to Osteoarthritis of the 
Knee   
 
Protocol Number: 
R5069-OA-1849 
Protocol Version:  
R5069-OA-1849 Amendment 1 
 
See appended electronic signature page 
Sponsor’s Responsible Medical/Study Director 
 
 
See appended electronic signature page 
Sponsor’s Responsible Regulatory Liaison 
 
 
See appended electronic signature page 
Sponsor’s Responsible Clinical Study Leader 
 
 
See appended electronic signature page 
Sponsor’s Responsible Biostatistician 
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00

Signature Page for VV-RIM-00083543 v1.0
Signature Page for VV-RIM-00083543 v1.0 Approved
ESig Approval
ESig Approval
ESig Approval
ESig Approval
                                        VV-RIM-00083543-1.0 Approved - 04 Sep 2019 GMT-5:00