Neural Substrates of Emotion: Impact of Cocaine Dependence
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Cocaine Use Disorder
Sponsor: Medical University of South Carolina

NCT#02682784 
 
Title: Neural substrates of emotion: Impact of cocaine dependence 
 
Document Date: 06/18/2020 
 
   

1 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
NEURAL SUBSTRATES OF EMOTION: IMPACT OF COCAINE DEPENDENCE 
SPECIFIC AIMS 
 
Over one million individuals in the United States meet criteria for cocaine use disorders. Relapse rates are 
highest among cocaine-dependent (CD) populations. Social stress is a significant risk factor for relapse. Data 
from human neuroimaging studies suggest that “top-down” prefrontal cortical inhibition of amygdala activity 
controls emotional responses to social stimuli. A growing literature suggests that hypoactivity in the medial 
prefrontal cortex coupled with increases in amygdala activity underscore the vulnerability of CD individuals to 
relapse. Neuroimaging studies of corticolimbic network activity (functional connectivity) have been conducted in 
CD subjects at rest.  Compared with healthy controls, CD subjects exhibited lower corticolimbic connectivity and 
the degree of corticolimbic uncoupling was associated with time to relapse. Studies measuring corticolimbic 
connectivity during exposure to a social stress task in CD subjects could provide critical insight into the 
neurobiologic mechanisms that underscore the sensitivity of CD individuals to social stress. Moreover 
interventions that improve corticolimbic connectivity in CD subjects may be effective therapeutic strategies for 
preventing relapse in CD populations. Oxytocin (OT) is an anxiolytic neuropeptide that attenuates amygdala 
responses to aversive social cues. In order to better understand the neurobiologic mechanisms that control 
emotion-related behavior in CD populations, we propose a double-blind placebo (PBO) controlled study using 
blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure (1) 
corticolimbic functional connectivity during the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) and (2) amygdala activity 
in response to an implicit facial affect recognition paradigm in groups of CD individuals (CD n=80) and healthy 
non-dependent controls (HC, n=80). Prior to the scanning session, participants will receive either intranasal OT 
(24 IU) or PBO spray (n=40 per treatment group). The order of the tasks will be counterbalanced.  
Specific Aim 1: To determine the impact of cocaine dependence and oxytocin on functional connectivity between 
corticolimbic brain regions during acute social stress. Psychophysiologic interaction (PPI) analysis using the 
amygdala as the seed region will be used to assess significant task (stress condition > control condition) x seed 
interactions. Subjective anxiety and craving data will be collected at baseline and after each run of the MIST. 
Hypothesis 1A: The HC-PBO group will exhibit greater functional connectivity between the amygdala and 
prefrontal cortical regions (orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices) than the CD-PBO group.  
Hypothesis 1B: The CD-OT group will exhibit greater functional connectivity between the amygdala and 
prefrontal cortical regions (orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices) than the CD-PBO group.  
Hypothesis 1C: The CD-OT group will report lower subjective anxiety and craving than the CD-PBO group. 
Specific Aim 2:  Use an implicit facial affect recognition paradigm to determine the impact of cocaine dependence 
and oxytocin on amygdala activity in response to fearful faces. The BOLD signal measured during neutral faces 
will be subtracted from the BOLD signal measured during fearful faces.   
Hypothesis 2A: The CD-PBO group will exhibit greater amygdala activity in response to fearful faces than 
HC-PBO group. 
Hypothesis 2B: Compared with the CD-PBO group, participants in the CD-OT group will exhibit lower 
amygdala activity in response to fearful faces. 
Currently there are no FDA approved medications for the treatment of cocaine dependence. Identifying the 
neurobiologic substrates of emotion-related behavior in cocaine-dependent individuals may help in the 
identification of targets for the development of treatment strategies aimed at controlling emotion-related behavior. 
 
 

2 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
RESEARCH STRATEGY 
A. SIGNIFICANCE 
Cocaine dependence is characterized by compulsive drug-seeking behavior despite the deleterious 
consequences of repeated drug use.  Cocaine dependence wields devastating effects on the individuals’ social 
relationships. Currently over one million individuals in the United States meet criteria for a cocaine use disorder 
with an estimated 1,800 initiates of cocaine use per day (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration, 2013). Cocaine use accounts for approximately 40% of illicit drug-related trips to emergency 
rooms (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2013). 
Moreover, relapse rates are high among cocaine-dependent (CD) populations (McKay et al., 1995; McMahon, 
2001; Sinha et al., 1999). To date, there are no FDA approved medications for the treatment of cocaine 
dependence. In addition, the gold-standard behavioral interventions for substance use disorders have had limited 
success in sustaining behavioral change (Miller et al., 2001). A critical step towards improving treatment 
outcomes and developing pharmacological interventions for ameliorating relapse is to identify the neurobiologic 
dysregulation that controls emotion-related behavior in CD individuals.  Importantly, social avoidance can impede 
effective treatment particularly in group settings, a commonly employed treatment modality.  Therefore, 
therapeutic interventions that reduce anxiety, increase trust and promote social affiliation may improve treatment 
outcomes for CD individuals. 
Role of Social Stress in the Development and Maintenance of Substance Use Disorders 
 
A growing literature suggests that social stress plays an important role in the vulnerability to use and abuse 
substances (Rhodes et al., 1990; Volkow et al., 2011). In support, preclinical studies have found that chronic 
social stress increases the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. For example, cocaine acts as a reinforcer in 
socially subordinate monkeys but not in socially dominant monkeys (Morgan et al., 2002). In addition, socially 
isolated rodents readily self-administer cocaine as compared to rodents housed in groups (Schenk et al., 1987). 
Epidemiological data demonstrate a strong link between childhood maltreatment and the risk for the development 
of substance use disorders (SUDs) (Felitti et al., 1998). Clinical studies have found that social stress increases 
drug craving in CD individuals (Sinha et al., 1999; Waldrop et al., 2010). Of note, CD individuals report twice as 
many daily hassles as healthy controls (Back et al., 2008). In addition, perceived stress in response to 
interpersonal conflict has been associated with craving and patterns of cocaine use (Waldrop et al., 2007). 
Consistent with this model, drug and/or alcohol consumption has been positively associated with lack of social 
support and avoidance coping (Cronkite et al., 1984; DeFrank et al., 1987; Hall et al., 1991; Pohorecky, 1991). 
Substance dependent individuals often favor drug use over social interactions (American Psychiatric Association, 
2013). Importantly, social avoidance can impede effective treatment particularly in group settings.  Taken 
together these studies suggest that social stress is a significant factor in all stages of the addiction cycle. 
Oxytocin Modulates Social Behavior 
 
Oxytocin (OT) is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that elicits physiologic events necessary for copulation, 
parturition and lactation (Carter, 1992; Kendrick et al., 1992). In rodents, central release of OT increases social 
cognition (Ferguson et al., 2001).  Data from preclinical studies also demonstrate that there are pro-social effects 
of OT.  For example, OT increases approach behavior (Witt et al., 1992), and plays an essential role in 
establishing partner preferences and monogamous pair bonding in prairie voles (Williams et al., 1994). In 
addition, OT increased the frequency of choices associated with social reward in a study of non-human primates 
(Chang et al., 2012). Another study of non-human primates found that OT increased attention to faces and eyes 
and reduced vigilance towards potential social threats (Ebitz et al., 2013). Current perspectives on the effects of 
OT in the area of human social cognition and behavior; support its role as enhancing sociality. For example, 
clinical studies have found that intranasal administration of OT increases interpersonal trust (Kosfeld et al., 
2005), social recognition memory (Guastella et al., 2008), empathy (Domes, Heinrichs, Michel, et al., 2007; 
Hurlemann et al., 2010) and generosity (Zak et al., 2007).  However, other clinical studies have found that 
intranasal OT can increase envy (Shamay-Tsoory et al., 2009), ethnocentrism (De Dreu et al., 2011) and impede 
trust in individuals with borderline personality disorder (Bartz et al., 2011), findings that conflict with the idea that 
OT has positive effects on human behavior. These inconsistent findings have been hypothesized to result from 
reduced anxiety, increases in perceptual salience and/or motivational states related to affiliation (Bartz et al., 
2011; Striepens et al., 2012). The anxiolytic effects of oxytocin to social stress have been found in healthy 

3 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
controls (de Oliveira et al., 2012; Heinrichs et al., 2003; Yatzkar, 2010). Of note, another study of healthy controls 
found no effect of OT on subjective anxiety (Kirsch et al., 2005).  A growing literature suggests that the effects 
of OT on social behavior are modulated by interindividual factors. For example, in a study of non-human 
primates, OT increased social contact in subordinate males but not in dominant males (Insel et al., 1991). In 
humans, OT reduced social stress reactivity in individuals with poor coping skills and emotional regulation but 
not in healthy controls (Cardoso et al., 2012; Quirin et al., 2011).  Another study found that men with early 
parental separation (EPS) had a more robust cortisol response to OT as compared to a group without EPS 
(Meinlschmidt et al., 2007).  In addition, OT attenuated stress induced dysphoria in individuals with borderline 
personality disorder and anxiety in individuals with social anxiety disorder (Simeon et al., 2011). Thus, OT may 
be effective for reducing anxiety to a social stressor in individuals with mood and/or psychiatric disorders 
(Macdonald et al., 2013). 
Dysregulation in the Oxytocin System Role in Drug Abuse and Dependence 
 
Chronic drug use appears to alter the OT system. For example, a immunohistochemical analysis of post-
mortem brains of alcoholics found a significant reduction in OT immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus (Sivukhina 
et al., 2006).  Further, mothers using cocaine during pregnancy exhibited significantly lower plasma OT levels, 
as well as greater hostility and depression as compared to control mothers (Light et al., 2004).  A preclinical 
study found that chronic methamphetamine treatment increased OT receptor expression in the amygdala, 
suggesting that chronic stimulant use attenuates central OT signaling (Zanos et al., 2014).   
 
A growing literature demonstrates protective effects of OT at every stage of the addiction cycle. For example, 
animal models of drug reinforcement have found that OT administration decreases cocaine-induced hyperactivity 
and stereotypy (Sarnyai et al., 1991; Sarnyai et al., 1992).  In addition, OT inhibits the development of tolerance 
to repeated cocaine administration (Sarnyai, Biro, et al., 1992) and attenuates self-administration of cocaine 
(Sarnyai et al., 1994). Central administration of OT also blocks methamphetamine-induced locomotor activity 
and reduces methamphetamine-induced reinstatement. In addition, OT attenuates both drug and cue-induced 
reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior (Carson et al., 2010; Morales-Rivera et al., 2014).  Oxytocin has also 
been shown to inhibit stress-induced glutamate release and to interfere with dopamine-driven object oriented 
reward (McGregor et al., 2012; Qi et al., 2008; Qi et al., 2009). As such, OT could influence addiction by 
interfering with stress-induced relapse or by decreasing rewarding drug effects. In agreement with these findings, 
an emerging clinical literature suggests that increasing central OT attenuates the symptoms of drug withdrawal 
(Cui et al., 2001; Winstock et al., 2009). For example, intranasal administration of OT attenuated craving and 
anxiety in marijuana-dependent individuals exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test (Trier) (McRae-Clark et al., 
2013).  Of note, intranasal OT improves fear recognition in healthy controls, a finding that is particularly 
interesting as CD individuals exhibit deficits in fear recognition (Fischer-Shofty et al., 2010; Kemmis et al., 2007). 
Taken together, these preclinical and clinical data suggest an important role of OT in addictions and 
point to the OT system as a potential neurobiologic target for therapeutic development. 
Corticolimbic Coupling Regulates Emotional Responses to Social Stimuli 
 
Corticolimbic brain regions including the amygdala and regions of the prefrontal cortex play important roles 
in arousal and appraisal of social stimuli (LeDoux, 2000; Phan et al., 2002). First, studies of non-human primates 
have found dense reciprocal projections between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex (Aggleton et al., 1980; 
Carmichael et al., 1995; Ghashghaei et al., 2007; Price, 2005). Human neuroimaging studies have found that 
cues evoking sad, fearful and happy emotions increase activity in the amygdala (Blair et al., 1999; Breiter et al., 
1996; Phillips et al., 2001).  Thus, amygdala activity in response to a variety of emotional states suggests that it 
is a critical substrate involved in arousal and attention to social stimuli regardless of the valence. Tasks that yield 
affective states also increase activity in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC), ventromedial prefrontal cortex 
(vmPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (subgenACC) (Dougherty et al., 
1999; O'Doherty et al., 2001; Shin et al., 2000). Functional connectivity between corticolimbic brain regions was 
measured in subjects that were exposed to the Trier and a no-stress group. Compared with the no-stress group, 
subjects that were exposed to the Trier exhibited significantly greater coupling between the amygdala and the 
OFC (Veer, 2010). In general, data from human neuroimaging studies suggest that suppression and/or 
reappraisal of negative affect is mediated by activation of prefrontal cortical brain regions and deactivation of the 
amygdala (Beauregard et al., 2001; Levesque et al., 2004; Ochsner et al., 2002; Ohira et al., 2006). For example, 

4 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
during cognitive reappraisal of aversive stimuli the magnitude of functional connectivity between the amygdala 
and the OFC was inversely associated with the degree of negative affect attenuation (Banks et al., 2007). Thus, 
top-down prefrontal cortical control of the amygdala (corticolimbic coupling) appears to play a 
preeminent role in regulating emotional responses to social stimuli (FIGURE 1A). 
Corticolimbic Uncoupling & Social Stress: Role in Cocaine Dependence 
 
Data from human neuroimaging studies demonstrates dysregulation in the corticolimbic circuitry of CD 
individuals. For example, CD individuals exhibit altered corticolimbic activity in response to triggers of relapse 
(Childress et al., 1999; Grant et al., 1996; Kilts et al., 2001; Sinha et al., 2005).  In addition, compared with 
healthy controls, CD individuals exhibited significantly less activity in the vmPFC and subgenACC during tasks 
that require the processing of both negative and positive affect (Goldstein et al., 2011; Wexler et al., 2001). 
Functional connectivity between corticolimbic brain regions has been studied in CD individuals at rest. Compared 
with healthy controls, CD individuals exhibited significantly less functional connectivity between corticolimbic 
brain regions (Gu et al., 2010).  Moreover, time to relapse was associated with attenuated connectivity between 
the amygdala and the vmPFC (McHugh et al., 2014).  Of note, cortico-amygdala uncoupling has also been found 
in patients with depression and anxiety disorders (Kim et al., 2009; Pezawas et al., 2005). Thus, corticolimbic 
uncoupling may be a significant neurobiologic factor that underscores the sensitivity of CD individuals to 
interpersonal stress and relapse. Thus, these studies suggest that cocaine dependence is associated with 
alterations in functional connectivity between corticolimbic brain regions (Figure 1B). In the proposed 
study, we will explore functional connectivity between corticolimbic brain regions in CD individuals and 
healthy controls.   
Oxytocin Alters Corticolimbic Connectivity 
 
In general, data from neuroimaging studies of healthy controls, suggest that intranasal OT increases 
functional connectivity between corticolimbic brain regions. For example, intranasal OT increases functional 
connectivity between the amygdala and the mPFC of healthy controls at rest (Sripada et al., 2013).  A recent 
neuroimaging study examined the effects of OT on corticolimbic connectivity in patients with generalized social 
anxiety disorder at rest. Oxytocin increased functional connectivity between the left and right amygdala with the 
ACC and mPFC.  In addition, under the placebo condition higher social anxiety was associated with lower 
corticolimbic 
connectivity.  
Moreover, higher social anxiety 
was associated with a greater 
increase 
in 
corticolimbic 
connectivity by OT (Dodhia et al., 
2014).  Thus, these data support 
our hypotheses and suggest that 
corticolimbic network activity is a 
critical neural substrate in the 
anxiolytic effects of OT. Of note, 
intranasal 
OT 
also 
affects 
amygdala connectivity with the salience network, a finding that has been associated with OTs effects on empathy 
and trust (Riem et al., 2011; Riem et al., 2012; Seeley et al., 2007; Striepens et al., 2012). Interestingly, intranasal 
OT can attenuate functional connectivity between the amygdala and brain regions responsible for regulating 
autonomic and endocrine manifestations of fear and anxiety (Kirsch et al., 2005). These studies suggest that 
intranasal OT enhances amygdala connectivity with prefrontal cortical brain regions (Figure 1C).  In the 
proposed study, we will explore the effect of OT on functional connectivity between corticolimbic regions 
and its relationship to anxiety and craving in CD individuals and controls.    
Evidence Linking Cocaine Dependence with a Loss of Bottom-Up Control: Role of the Amygdala 
 
The ability to recognize emotional cues from faces is a necessary component of social interactions (Blair, 
2003). To date, the impact of cocaine use on facial affect processing remains unclear.  For example, clinical 
studies of CD subjects found no difference between CD and healthy controls in the ability to recognize the 
emotional expressions of faces (Fox et al., 2011; Hulka et al., 2013).  Another study found that compared with 
healthy controls, recreational cocaine users exhibited deficits in the ability to accurately recognize faces depicting 
healthy controls-PBO
cocaine-dependent-PBO
A
B
C
D
Figure 1. Schematic overview of Specific Aim 1. Corticolimbic functional connectivity during social stress in (A) healthy controls
treated with placebo (PBO) (B) cocaine-dependent individuals treated with PBO (C) healthy controls treated with oxytocin (OT)
and (D) cocaine-dependent individuals treated with OT. Lines represent the magnitude of functional connectivity between the
amygdala and orbital frontal cortex (OFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).
Hypothesis 1A: A > B
Hypothesis 1B: B < D
OFC
Amygdala
ACC
OFC
Amygdala
ACC
OFC
Amygdala
ACC
OFC
Amygdala
ACC
healthy controls-OT
cocaine-dependent-OT

5 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
fear (Kemmis et al., 2007). Of note, patients with anxiety disorders also exhibit deficits fear recognition accuracy 
(Poljac et al., 2011). The amygdala plays a critical role in processing socially salient information from faces, 
including fear (Adolphs et al., 1994; LeDoux, 2000; Ochsner et al., 2009). The amygdala provides low level 
bottom-up regulation of the prefrontal cortex both directly through efferent projections to cortical sensory regions 
and indirectly through brain arousal systems including the locus coeruleus that project to regions of the mPFC 
(Aston-Jones et al., 1996; Holland et al., 1999; McDonald, 1998; Turner et al., 1980). Accumulating evidence 
suggest that cocaine use is associated with functional and structural alterations in the amygdala that underscore 
the anxiogenic effects of drug withdrawal and relapse (Erb et al., 2000; Franklin et al., 2002; Makris et al., 2004; 
Rudoy et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2003). Human neuroimaging studies have found amygdala activation in response 
to faces depicting fear even when the faces are presented outside of the subjects’ conscious awareness and 
have been linked with arousal systems that are independent of mPFC activity (Critchley et al., 2000; Morris et 
al., 1998; Morris et al., 1999; Whalen et al., 1998).  Patients with anxiety disorders exhibit hyperactive amygdala 
activity in response to implicit faces depicting fear (Rauch et al., 2000; Straube et al., 2004). Thus, elevated 
bottom-up drive anxiety disorders may also play an important in the deficits in social cognition that have been 
found in CD subjects. 
 
The amygdala appears to be a critical target for oxytocin’s effects on social behavior. Oxytocin receptors 
have been localized to the amygdala of rodents and humans (Boccia et al., 2013; Insel et al., 1992; Veinante et 
al., 1997). Data from human neuroimaging studies demonstrate that intranasal OT attenuates amygdala 
responses to both aversive and positive social cues (Domes, Heinrichs, Glascher, et al., 2007; Kirsch et al., 
2005; Labuschagne et al., 2010; Petrovic et al., 2008; Riem et al., 2012; Wittfoth-Schardt et al., 2012). While the 
exact mechanism mediating OT’s effect is unclear, it has been hypothesized that OT receptor activation of 
GABAergic interneurons in the amygdala plays an important role in the inhibitory effects of OT on amygdala 
responding to social cues (Ehrlich et al., 2009; Huber et al., 2005). Intranasal OT improves fear recognition in 
healthy controls, findings that are particularly interesting given the deficits in fear processing that have been 
found in CD subjects  (Fischer-Shofty et al., 2010). Taken together these data suggest that altered amygdala 
reactivity is a significant factor in the emotional dysregulation associated with cocaine dependence.  
B. INNOVATION 
• The proposed project will be the first to use both social evaluative feedback and an uncontrollable cognitive 
challenge to study stress-related brain activity in cocaine-dependent individuals.  
• This is the first clinical investigation of oxytocin on social stress-related brain activity in cocaine-dependent 
individuals. 
• The proposed studies are the first to examine the impact of social stress on brain activity at a network level. 
• Drug addiction has typically been modelled as dysregulation in “top-down” control.  The use of an implicit 
facial affect recognition paradigm will allow us to assess addiction as dysregulation in “bottom-up” drive. 
C. APPROACH 
C1. Research Team 
C1a. Overview 
 
We have assembled a multidisciplinary team with unique and complementary skills in addictions research, 
neuroimaging and clinical studies of oxytocin.  The project will be led by Dr. McRae-Clark.  Kathleen Brady, M.D., 
Ph.D., Karen Hartwell M.D., Julianne Flanagan, PhD and Jane Joseph Ph.D. are Co-Investigators (Co-Is) on the 
project. Dr. Joseph will oversee the neuroimaging data acquisition and analysis. Drs. Hartwell and Brady are 
clinician scientists and will oversee the safety of the research participants.  Each of the Co-Is will be involved in 
data interpretation and manuscript development.   
C1b. Experience with Addictions Research  
The proposed project will be directed by Dr. Aimee McRae-Clark. Dr. McRae-Clark is a Professor in the 
Department of Psychiatry and a productive clinical researcher with independent NIH-funding focused on clinical 
trials and human laboratory work with drug-dependent individuals. As such, she has extensive experience in 
conducting clinical laboratory studies examining stress induction. Dr. McRae-Clark will oversee the day-to-day 
operations of the project including direct supervision of the research staff as well as coordinate data analysis 
and presentation. 

6 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Dr. Flanagan is a licensed clinical psychologist with over 10 years of experience conducting research on 
substance use disorders (SUD) and commonly co-occurring conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder 
(PTSD). Her area of expertise has expanded to include numerous studies examining clinical applications of 
oxytocin and other pharmacological interventions for SUD and co-occurring conditions. Dr. Flanagan is an 
Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Medical University of 
South Carolina. 
 
C1c. Experience with OT Administration 
 
Dr. McRae-Clark has extensive experience with clinical studies that have involved administering intranasal 
OT to (1) marijuana-dependent individuals (McRae-Clark et al., 2013) (2) CD individuals (P50 DA016511) (3) 
individuals with PTSD (R21 MH099619; U.S. Department of Defense, Sub-Award 804-237) and (4) healthy 
controls (R21 MH099619). To date, OT has been administered to over 150 research participants with no adverse 
or serious adverse events reported.   
C1d. Experience with Neuroimaging Paradigms Data Acquisition and Analysis  
 
Dr. Joseph has 15 years of experience in human neuroimaging studies of facial affect recognition and 
functional connectivity analysis (R01 HD052724, R21/R33 MH086958) (Joseph et al., 2009; Joseph et al., 2012). 
Drs. Moran-Santa Maria and Joseph are currently Co-Is on the neuroimaging component of Dr. Brady’s study 
“Oxytocin and Cocaine Dependence” (P50 DA016511). Drs. Brady and Hartwell also have experience in using 
BOLD fMRI to assess brain activity in individuals with SUDs (Hartwell et al., 2011; Hartwell et al., 2013; 
Prisciandaro et al., 2013).   
C2. Preliminary Studies 
C2a. Evidence for Corticolimbic Uncoupling in CD 
Individuals  
 Corticolimbic coupling during the MIST was measured 
in CD and HC using a psychophysiological interaction (PPI) 
analysis.  Using the left amygdala as the seed region, 
significant task x seed interactions were observed in both 
groups. In the CD group the left amygdala exhibited 
significantly greater functional connectivity with the posterior 
cingulate cortex during the stress condition than the control 
condition (Figure 2A). In the HC group, the left amygdala 
exhibited significantly greater functional connectivity with 
the OFC during the stress condition than the control condition. Cocaine-dependent subjects reported significantly 
greater anxiety in response to the MIST than the HC subjects (Figure 2B). Thus, these preliminary findings 
support our hypotheses and the feasibility of using PPI to assess functional connectivity associated with a social 
stress task in CD and HC subjects.   
C2b.Oxytocin Attenuates Anxiety in Marijuana-Dependent Individuals 
 
In a double blind placebo controlled study, we investigated the impact of intranasal OT administration on 
subjective responses to the Trier Social Stress Task in marijuana-dependent individuals. Compared with subjects 
who received placebo, subjects that received OT reported significantly lower subjective anxiety (p=0.05) and 
drug craving (p<0.05) (McRae-Clark et al., 2013).   
C2c. Evidence for Hyperactive Amygdala Responses to Social Stress in CD Subjects 
 In a pilot study, we used the MIST to compare social stress-related brain activity between CD individuals 
(n=13) and healthy controls (HC; n=15).  Using a block design BOLD fMRI 
data were collected during three runs of the MIST. During social stress 
(stress condition-control condition) CD subjects exhibited significantly 
greater activity in the left amygdala than HC subjects (Figure 3A).  In 
contrast, during social stress the HC subjects did not exhibit significantly 
greater activity than the CD subjects in any brain region.  During mental 
arithmetic (control condition-rest condition), the HC subjects exhibited 
significantly greater activity in the anterior cingulate cortex than the CD 
Figure 2. (A) Areas exhibiting significant task-dependent (stress > control) functional connectivity
with the left amygdala during the MIST in the CD group bilateral posterior cingulate MNI
coordinates (±2, -54, 30) Brodmann area (BA 23); and the HC group bilateral OFC (±40, 58, 2)
Brodmann area (BA 10). Z statistic images were thresholded using clusters determined by Z>2.3
and a corrected cluster significance of p=0.05 (B) Peak anxiety to the MIST. Values are group
means (+) se * Denotes significant difference from HC (p<0.05).
z = 2
CD
Stress > Control
L
z = 30
HC
2.8
3.2
3.6
4.0
B
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HC
CD
Anxiety
*
A
CD > HC
Stress
A
HC > CD
Mental Arithmetic
B
L
4.0
4.5
5.0
L
Figure
3.
Areas
exhibiting
significant
group
differences
during
stress
and
mental
arithmetic during the MIST. (A)
Cocaine-dependent
(CD)
subjects
exhibited
significantly
greater
activity
in
the
left
amygdala (MNI: -26, -4, -22)
than healthy controls (HC). (B)
HC
subjects
exhibited
significantly greater
activity in
bilateral
anterior
cingulate
cortices (MNI; 0, 8, 22) than CD
participants
in
response
to
mental
arithmetic.
Z
statistic
images were thresholded using
clusters
determined
by
Z>2.3
and
a
corrected
cluster
significance of p=0.05.

7 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
subjects (Figure 3B). In contrast, during mental arithmetic the CD subjects did not exhibit significantly greater 
activity than the HC group in any brain region. Thus, these preliminary data from the MIST demonstrate that CD 
subjects exhibited significantly greater amygdala responses to social stress and significantly lower prefrontal 
cortical responses to a cognitive challenge compared with HC.  In addition, these data demonstrate the research 
teams’ experience in using the MIST to study the neural correlates of social stress in CD individuals and healthy 
controls. 
C3. Design and Methods of Current Proposal 
C3a. Overview 
The primary objective of this proposal is to identifying the neurobiologic substrates of emotion-related 
behavior in CD individuals. After the initial screening and assessment visit, an fMRI study visit will be scheduled 
(Figure 4).  The study will use a double-blind placebo-controlled design. Prior to the scan, participants will receive 
either intranasal OT (24 IU) or a placebo (PBO) spray. During the scan, BOLD fMRI data will be acquired while 
the participants perform a series of stressful and non-stressful mental arithmetic challenges (Dedovic et al., 
2005). Performance feedback will be provided by the MIST software in real-time and also by the investigator. 
Participants will complete three runs of the MIST. Subjective responses (anxiety and craving) will be collected at 
baseline and immediately after each run of the MIST. Participants will also complete an implicit facial affect 
recognition task. Since the amygdala may habituate to the stress tasks, the order of the tasks will be 
counterbalanced.  At the end of the study visit, subjects will be debriefed, compensated and discharged.  
C3b. Participants 
 
Subjects will be men and women of all racial and ethnic groups aged 18-65.  A total of 160 study participants 
will be recruited: (1) cocaine-dependent individuals (CD, n=80); and (2) healthy control subjects free of major 
Axis I diagnoses (HC, n=80). Gender differences in the neural correlates of stress have been found in fMRI 
studies of HC and CD individuals (Li et al., 2005; Potenza et al., 2012), and in amygdala responses to fearful 
faces following intranasal OT administration (Domes, Heinrichs, Glascher, et al., 2007; Domes et al., 2010). 
Based on our experience in recruiting CD subjects for clinical studies, we expect that 15-20% of the subjects will 
be female. Differential recruitment will be used as needed to ensure that 15-20% of the participants in each study 
group are female. Groups 
will also be matched on 
age, smoking status, and 
education. On a monthly 
basis, we will assess the 
status of each group in 
terms of core variables and 
tailor 
recruitment 
accordingly. This has worked well in all of our previous clinical research studies.  
C3c. Recruitment and Retention 
 
We anticipate screening (by telephone or in person) about 350 potential subjects. We will recruit “healthy 
adults” and “cocaine users” through multiple sources, including advertisements in local media via television, 
newspaper, internet and word of mouth among subjects. Secondary recruitment sites will include (1) patients 
referred from the MUSC Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs (CDAP); (2) individuals presenting to the 
Charleston Center for inpatient or outpatient treatment; and (3) The Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (4) 
Patients of MUSC who agreed to be contacted for research studies.  
 
Contingency management will be used to encourage drug abstinence and study retention (Petry et al., 2002; 
Petry et al., 2001).  Participants who present to MUSC’s Addiction Sciences Division for their scheduled study 
visit and provide a clean urine drug screen will draw from a bowl containing 250 chips that are assigned a certain 
value. 230 chips denote a small amount ($1.00), 18 chips denote a larger amount ($10.00), one chip denotes 
$50.00 and one chip denotes a jumbo amount ($100.00). Participants who arrive at the ASD with a clean urine 
drug screen be allowed five draws.  Participants who arrive at the ASD with a clean urine drug screen after being 
rescheduled will be allowed three draws.  
C3d. Procedures 
Individuals will be screened for eligibility over the telephone by a trained research assistant during which 
11:00 a.m.
Plasma OT, 
Estrogen & 
Progesterone
Implicit facial 
affect 
recognition 
task
Performance Feedback
11:30 a.m.
OT or PBO 
Administration
Study 
Debriefing
MIST
3
MIST
2
MIST
1
Figure 4. Overview of Study Visit Procedures

8 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
major inclusion/exclusion criteria will be assessed.  Individuals who appear eligible will be invited for an in-person 
interview with a member of the research team. Prior to any study procedures, the individual will sign an IRB-
approved informed consent form. Following consent, a battery of standardized assessments will be delivered 
(described below). A general medical history and physical exam will also be performed to ensure that the subject 
is eligible to participate. The exam will also include a metal screening questionnaire that will be reviewed by 
clinical staff. If a patient is ineligible to participate, he or she will be given a referral for medical care and/or an 
appropriate treatment program.   
C3e. Assessments 
Screening and Diagnostic Instruments  
Quick Screen: This assessment will quickly determine whether an individual meets study inclusion or exclusion 
criteria. The instrument is designed to assess for substance dependence and obvious psychiatric, medical, and 
logistic exclusions.  
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Version 7: The MINI is a brief structured interview that 
was designed to assess DSM 5 diagnoses using a series of questions in dichotomous format (yes/no).  Earlier 
studies have found that the MINI is similar in sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability to other more lengthy 
diagnostic interviews, such as the SCID-I/P (Sheehan et al., 1998).  
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ):  Since childhood trauma has been shown to affect corticolimbic brain 
activity (Dannlowski et al., 2012) and corticolimbic brain activity following OT administration (Fan et al., 2014) 
we will use the CTQ to assess childhood trauma exposure in each of the study participants (D. P. Bernstein et 
al., 1994; D. P. Bernstein, Fink, L.A., 1998). The CTQ is a 25-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the 
extent to which individuals have childhood abuse and neglect. Subjects answer each question using a 5-point 
Likert scale ranging from (1) never true to 5 (very often true). The reliability and validity of the CTQ have been 
tested in both healthy and substance-dependent populations (D. P. Bernstein et al., 1994; D. P. Bernstein, Fink, 
L.A., 1998; Carpenter et al., 2007; Hyman et al., 2008; Hyman et al., 2007). 
Within Session Rating Scale: A modification of the Within Session Rating Scale (Childress et al., 1986) will be 
used to assess craving and mood during the procedures.  This scale is anchored with the adjectival modifiers 
(“not at all and extremely”). There are four items assessing domains of craving (want/need/craving/ability to 
resist). For the market value item, the individual will be asked to name the dollar amount they would be willing to 
pay for cocaine if they could have it “now”. Other items include anxiety and mood. These data will be collected 
prior to treatment, prior to MIST1, and immediately after each run of the MIST. 
Menstrual History Diary: Drug craving mood and affect have been associated with menstrual cycle phase and 
ovarian hormone status (Kirschbaum et al., 1999; Sinha et al., 2007).  Subjects will be asked to estimate the 
timing of their cycle for the 90-days prior to study entry and to track their cycle during study participation. Daily 
Hassles Scale: The Daily Hassles Scale consists of a list of 117 irritating, frustrating or distressing events that 
characterize everyday interactions with the environment. Subjects rate intensity for the past month. The Daily 
Hassles Scale is positively correlated with adaptational outcomes and is a good predictor of psychological 
symptoms (Kanner et al., 1981).  Data from the daily hassles will be used to explore the relationship between 
stress related corticolimbic brain activity and sensitivity to daily hassles. 
Metal Screening Questionnaire (MSQ): The MSQ is a list of 18 “yes or no” questions regarding pacemakers, 
shrapnel, bullets, implants, tattoos, hairpieces, insulin pumps, cochlear implants, staples and metal clips, false 
eyes, nerve stimulators, dental bridges, replacement valves, IUDs, dentures, trans-dermal nicotine patches, 
surgery, metal in the eyes, claustrophobia, and current pregnancy.  In addition the MSQ asks “have you ever 
been shot at or received treated for metal in your eyes?” The questionnaire is anchored by “Is there any possibility 
of metal, metal pieces, or metal implants in your body?” Each study participant will be asked to fill-out the MSQ 
at the assessment visit and the clinician will review the MSQ with the participant during the physical exam.  
Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS): Nicotine withdrawal could have a significant impact on our 
study outcomes. The MNWS is a 15-item self-report scale of behaviors associated with nicotine withdrawal 
(Hughes et al., 1986).  Subjects answer each question using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (0) none to 4 
(severe).  Smokers will be asked to fill-out the questionnaire both before (prior to medication administration) and 
after the scanning sessions. Group differences in the severity of nicotine withdrawal may be used as covariates 
in the analysis. 

9 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): The CD-RISC is a 25-item self-report measure that 
assesses the ability to cope with stress and adversity (Connor et al., 2003). Participants will be asked to complete 
the CD-RISC at the assessment visit.  
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List Short Form (ISEL-SF): The ISEL-SF is a 12-item self-report form that 
measures perceived availability of four domains of social support (belonging, self-esteem, appraisal and 
tangible)(Cohen‚ S et al., 1985).  Individuals rate each item using a four-point scale ranging from definitely false 
(1) to definitely true (4). Participants will be asked to complete the ISEL-SF at the assessment visit.  
Beck Depression Inventory- 2nd Addition (BDI-II): The BDI-II  is a 21-item self-report instrument intended to 
assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression (Beck et al., 1996). 
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults (STAI): The STAI  is a commonly used measure of trait and state 
anxiety.  It can be used in clinical settings to diagnose anxiety and to distinguish it from depressive syndromes 
(Speilberger, et al., 1983). 
Conflict Tactics Scale- Short Form: This is the most widely used instrument for measuring intimate partner 
violence (Straus & Douglas, 2004). 
Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): The DAST-10 yields a quantitative index of the degree of consequences 
related to drug abuse. The instrument takes approximately 5 minutes to administer and may be given in either a 
self-report or interview format (Skinner, 1982). 
Brief COPE: The Brief COPE is a self-completed questionnaire measuring coping strategies. It comprises 14 
subscales for which psychometric properties are described (Carver, 1997). 
UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale: The UPPS-P was designed to measure impulsivity across dimensions of 
the Five Factor Model of personality. It is 45-itme Likert-type scale (Lyman et al., 2006) 
Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRPS): The LSRPS (Levenson et al., 1995) is a 26-item self-
report measure designed to capture two features of psychopathy, including a callous and unemotional 
personality style, and a tendency towards impulsive antisociality. Items are rated on a Likert scale from 1 
("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree"). 
Urine Pregnancy Test: Female participants of childbearing potential will be asked to provide a urine sample 
which will be tested for the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) using the QuickVue One-Step 
urine hCG pregnancy test (Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA). The test provides a qualitative measure of hCG 
in urine (≥ 25 mIU/mL; 99% sensitivity; 99% specificity). The urine pregnancy test will be performed at screening 
and on the day of the study visit, prior to the urine drug screen and breathalyzer test. If the pregnancy test is 
positive, the subject will be excluded and no further testing will take place. 
Blood Sample Collection and Assays: Baseline blood samples for estradiol, progesterone and OT will be 
collected from each participant 15-30 minutes prior to the OT/PBO administration. Blood will be collected in tubes 
containing EDTA. Tubes will be centrifuged at 1500 rpm at 4˚C. Plasma will be stored at −70˚C. Determination 
of OT will be performed using a commercial ELISA kit (Enzo Life Sciences). Intra-assay coefficients of variation 
for OT average ~3-5% and inter-assay variation is typically less than 10%.  
Substance-Related Instruments  
Form 90: The Form 90 (Miller, 1996), an assessment instrument commonly used in addiction studies, is similar 
in concept to the Time Line Follow-back (Sobell & Sobell, 1992). This is a calendar-based instrument designed 
to assess daily substance consumption. Study participants will be asked to estimate the amount of substance 
consumed with the aid of visual cues designed to accurately quantify consumption.  Cocaine will be recorded in 
dollar value as well as quantity in order to standardize for different types of cocaine use (crack, IV, nasal, etc.).  
The data will be summarized in three ways: (a) percent of abstinent days (i.e., no use); (b) amount of use per 
day and (c) days since last use.  
Urine Drug Screening:  Drug screens will be performed using the On Track Test Cup (Roche Diagnostics), 
an in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of drug or drug metabolite in the urine.  The On Track Test 
Cup profile (cut off) consists of amphetamines (1000ng/ml), cocaine (300 ng/ml), THC (50 ng/ml), morphine (300 
ng/ml), and benzodiazepines (200 ng/ml).  Results will be used to ascertain abstinence prior to initiation of test 
session and to substantiate self-report at the screening visit 
Breathalyzer: To ascertain abstinence from alcohol during the study period, subjects will have their breath 
sampled for the presence of alcohol (Alco-Sensor III, Intoximeters Inc., St. Louis, MO).  The Alco-Sensor III can 
accurately detect breath alcohol levels between .000-.400 BAC.  

10 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
 
C3f. Remote screening visit alternative. Patients may also complete the initial visit remotely if warranted. In 
this case, subjects will be electronically consented using Doxy.me. The informed consent will be emailed to the 
participant prior to the video call. The patient will have the opportunity to ask questions on the call and will 
electronically sign the document. A signed copy will be emailed to the participant. The M.I.N.I interview and 
medical history then be conducted, also via Doxy.me. If clinically indicated, patients may have a physical exam 
at the scanning visit. Blood pressure will be checked prior to medication administration. Patients will be advised 
to find a private location during these procedures to protect privacy and confidentiality. Patients will be sent 
survey links to complete self-report questionnaires. They will receive their ClinCard at the scanning visit. Screen 
fails will be sent a ClinCard in the mail which will not be loaded with payment until they confirm they have received 
it. 
 
Session Procedures  
Study Visit: Participants will be instructed to arrive at MUSC’s Addiction Sciences Division (ASD) on the morning 
of the study visit.  Participants will be informed that they will be expected to remain abstinent from cocaine and 
other drugs for the three-day period prior to the study visit in order to minimize the impact of recent drug/alcohol 
use on brain activity and subjective responses to the MIST. Participants will be asked to avoid caffeinated 
beverages on the morning of the study visit since caffeine may introduce variability in stress reactivity.  If a 
participant is nicotine-dependent (s)he will be provided with a nicotine patch. Upon arriving at the ASD, the 
participant will be breathalyzed and will provide a urine sample, which will be tested for the presence of cocaine, 
opiates, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, and stimulants; if female, a urine pregnancy test will also be 
administered prior to the drug test. If the pregnancy and urine drug tests are negative, with the exception of 
marijuana, the session will proceed. In the event a participant tests positive for drugs or alcohol, the study visit 
will be rescheduled. The participant will be escorted to the Clinical Neurobiology Laboratory at the Institute of 
Psychiatry for a blood draw. Participants will then be escorted to the on-campus Center for Biomedical Imaging 
(CBI) facility by approved study personnel.  
 
Medication Administration 
 
Intranasal OT and matching PBO (saline spray) will be compounded by MUSC’s Investigational Drug 
Services (IDS) which has extensive experience in extemporaneous OT preparation and quality control 
monitoring. Randomization will be done by IDS, who will keep a record of the blind.  The record will be available 
should unblinding be required. To achieve balance in sample size with respect to gender, smoking status, and 
age,a block randomized design with randomly varying block sizes will be used.  OT or PBO sprays will be 
administered at the CBI and under the supervision of the study staff approximately 45-minutes prior to the 
scanning session.  First the participant will be asked to blow their nose. The vial will be primed to ensure that 
each puff contains OT or placebo spray and not air. The participant will be instructed to exhale through their 
nose and then spray into one nostril while inhaling.  Nostrils will be alternated and the participant will be asked 
to repeat the procedure for each nostril.  Participants will self-administer nasal spray in each nostril until atotal 
of 24 IU is reached. The number of puffs will vary depending on the strength of the oxytocin; IDS provides this 
information.  This dose and timing of administration were selected based on similar fMRI studies demonstrating 
BOLD signal changes in the amygdala 45-50 minutes post-administration (Domes, Heinrichs, Glascher, et al., 
2007; Domes et al., 2010; Kirsch et al., 2005; Labuschagne et al., 2010).  
MRI Data Acquisition  
 
All MRI data will be aquired on a Siemens Trio 3T scanner (Siemens Medical, Erlangen, Germany). , 
participants will be placed in the mock scanner to acclimate to the scanning environment. If the mock scanner is 
not available on the test day, participants will proceed directly to the actual scan. Participants will be screened 
for metal using a handheld metal detector.  Study personnel will position subjects on the scanner bed with foam 
padding placed around their head to prevent motion. Participants will wear earplugs/headphones and the task 
will be projected on a wide screen located at the end of the scanner bore and viewed via a back-projected mirror 
that will be mounted on  12-channel head coil.  Participants will use a non-ferrous optical hand pad to submit 
their answers to the arithmetic task. The hand pad will be connected via an optical cable to a computer outside 

11 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
the scanner room.  Their ability to view the projection screen and use of the hand pad will be assessed prior to 
scanning. During initial scanner tuning, localizing, and structural scanning, participants will be shown “relaxing” 
images (i.e., 20 scenic pictures, each displayed for 30 seconds). A high resolution T1-weighted MPRAGE 
anatomical scan (TR = 8.1 ms, TE = 3.7 ms, flip angle = 8°, field of view = 256 mm, 1.0 mm) covering the entire 
brain and positioned using a sagittal scout image will be acquired for co-registration and normalization of 
functional images. T2*-weighted gradient echo EPI images will be acquired with the following parameters: TR = 
2500 ms, TE = 27 ms, flip angle = 77º, 40 axial slices (FOV = 224 x 224 mm, thickness = 3.5 mm voxels with 0.5 
mm gap, in interleaved order. The scanning planes will be oriented parallel to the anterior commissure–posterior 
commissure line.  
The Montreal Imaging Stress Task  
 
The study will use a block design of three, six-minute runs separated by two-minutes of rest for feedback, for 
a total of 24-minutes. During each run, participants will be exposed to 40-second blocks of three different 
conditions (rest, control, and stress).  Prior to the task, a research assistant will meet with each participant and 
described the parameters of the task.  The participants will be shown images of what the screen will look like 
during each condition. The participants will be instructed to relax during the rest condition and focus on the 
screen. During the control condition, the participants will be asked to answer math problems as accurately as 
possible but will also be told that their responses will not be recorded.  During the stress condition, the 
participants will be asked to perform the math task as quickly and accurately as possible.  They will be given 
immediate feedback about their performance and will be able to see the performance level of an “average” 
person through a performance bar that will be located at the top of the screen.  A strict time limit will be enforced 
througout the stress condition. The participants will be told that the average person would answer about 85% of 
the questions correctly, while in reality, the program’s algorithm limits the participants’ peformance rate to 
between 35-45%.  At the end of runs one and two,  the participants will be given negative feedback from the 
investigator and will be urged to improve their performance so that their data may be included in the study. To 
minimize the effects of scanner drift, the beginning condition will be counterbalanced between participants. 
However, the sequence of conditions will be constant (i.e. control condition will follow the rest condition and the 
stress condition will follow the control condition).  
Implicit Facial Affect Recognition Task 
The amygdala response to emotional faces that are presented outside the focus of attention (i.e. implicit 
tasks) is significantly greater than that observed during overt (explicit) presentation of the same stimuli (Critchley 
et al., 2000). Emotional adult faces will be selected from a variety of sources are standardized in size and 
enclosed in the same oval surround (Ekman, 1976).  Dr. Joseph (Co-I) has developed a corpus of faces for a 
recent project (National Institute of Mental Health, R21 MH086958-01, “A comparative developmental 
connectivity study of face processing”) that will be used for the present project. The faces will depict male and 
female Caucasian, Asian and African Americans expressing three different categories of emotion; fear, anger, 
and happiness. Neutral faces will also be presented (Figure 5). Because the participants will also be from 
different ethnic categories, it is important to include a mixture of races.  In a block design, participants will view 
a series of faces (for 27.5 sec) within a block and report on the gender of those faces at the end of the block (for 
5 sec). Each block will present 56 faces that depict the same emotion and same gender so there will be 6 
pseudorandomly ordered task blocks (3 emotions x 2 genders) and 7 rest blocks (27.5 sec each) that present a 
crosshair to be fixated. In each task block, each emotional face will be presented for 33 msec. followed by a 
neutral face mask (from a different individual) for 167 msec. followed by a blank screen for 291 msec. At the end 
of the block participants will report the gender using two buttons on a response pad. Assignment of face sets to 
sessions will be counterbalanced across subjects. 
Payment to Participants 
Subjects will be paid with Greenphire debit cards or cash for each completed study visit as follows: $75 for 
completing baseline assessments to see if you meet study requirements ($25 for the physical exam and $50 
for the interview) and $150 for completing the scanning session. The total amount that they may receive for 
participating in the study if they complete all study visits is a maximum of $225. If subjects choose not to 
complete the study, they will be compensated for the part(s) they have completed. Subjects who come to their 

12 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
scheduled study visit and provide a clean urine drug screen the first time they’re scheduled, they will draw 7 
chips from a bowl containing 250 chips that are assigned a certain value. Most chips are worth $1.00, some 
are worth $10.00, one chip is worth $50.00 and one chip is worth $100.00. If their visit has to be re-scheduled 
for any reason, they will be allowed to draw 3 chips.  
 Payments that subjects receive from MUSC for participating in a research study are considered taxable 
income per IRS regulations. Payment types may include, but are not limited to: checks, cash, gift 
certificates/cards, personal property, and other items of value. If the total amount of payment subjects receive 
from MUSC reaches or exceeds $600.00 in a calendar year, they will be issued a Form 1099. Participants will 
complete a W-9, either in person or via Doxy.me. 
C3f. Statistical Methods 
Specific Aim 1: To determine the impact of cocaine dependence and oxytocin on functional connectivity between 
corticolimbic brain regions during acute social stress.  
Hypothesis 1A: The HC-PBO group will exhibit greater functional connectivity between the amygdala and 
prefrontal cortical regions (orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices) than the CD-PBO group. 
Hypothesis 1B: The CD-OT group will exhibit greater functional connectivity between the amygdala and 
prefrontal cortical regions (orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices) than the CD-PBO group.  
Preprocessing: Post-acquisition preprocessing and statistical analysis of all of the neuroimaging data will be 
performed using FEAT (FMRI Expert Analysis Tool) Version 5.98, part of FSL (FMRIB's Software Library, 
www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) 
imaging data will be acquired using a standard multi-slice gradient echo planar imaging sequence (TR=2200 ms, 
TE=35 ms, 64 x 64 matrix, 3 mm isotropic voxels, 271 volumes). Data will be preprocessed using scripting tools 
from 
FMRI 
Expert 
Analysis 
Tool 
(FEAT) 
Version 
5.98, 
part 
of 
FMRIB's 
Software 
Library 
(FSL;www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl).  First non-brain signal will be removed using FSL’s BET brain extraction.  Scans 
will be corrected for motion using FSL’s linear registration and scans will be spatially smoothed using a Gaussian 
kernel of 8 mm FWHM. Since head motion can impact functional connectivity analyses, participants with head 
motion exceeding 0.2 mm will be excluded from the analyses (Power et al., 2012). The “fsl_motion_correction” 
scripting tool will be used to identify and scrub motion artifacts from each participant’s data (Power et al., 2013). 
Scans will be spatially co-registered with a standardized anatomical template (Montreal Neurological Institute) 
using a 12 parameter affine transformation (Rorden et al., 2000). Analysis: Functional connectivity will be 
measured using a PPI based approach (Friston et al., 1997).  A customized square wave form representing the 
task (1 = stress condition and -1 = control condition) and the duration of each condition will be convolved with a 
double-gamma hemodynamic response function. A mask of the seed region will be made using a 12-mm 
diameter sphere located in the center of the left amygdala using the MNI coordinates (x, y, z = -22, 0, -22).  The 
transformation parameters described above will also be applied to the mask.  For each participant and each run 
of the MIST, the mean corrected and high pass filtered time series of the BOLD signal in the left amygdala will 
be extracted and used in a single subject whole brain PPI analysis.  The PPI model will include (1) the task 
vector; (2) the time series of the BOLD signal in the left amygdala; (3) a term representing the positive task x 
seed interaction; and (4) a term representing the negative task x seed interaction. The first level analysis will 
generate contrast images of the parameter estimates for each of the four regressors. Since the hypotheses 
associated with Specific Aim 1 explore increases in amygdala - prefrontal cortical connectivity in response to 
social stress, the group analysis will focus on the positive interaction term. The contrast images of the parameter 
estimates of the positive interaction term will be entered into a 2nd-level random effects analysis. Unpaired t-tests 
will be used to test for the following group differences (Hypothesis 1A: CD-PBO vs. HC-PBO) and (Hypothesis 
1B: CD-OT vs. CD-PBO). Analyses will be conducted using FMRIBs Local Analysis of Mixed Effects (FLAME 1).  
Additional analyses comparing (HC-OT vs. CD-OT) will be conducted using an unpaired t-test and applying the 
appropriate corrections for multiple tests. We will also conduct an exploratory gender analysis between the CD 
and HC women in the four groups (Domes, Heinrichs, Glascher, et al., 2007; Domes et al., 2010; Potenza et al., 
2012). We anticipate that 15-20% of the subjects in each group will be female (n=6/8 per group). We 

13 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
acknowledge that we may be underpowered to conduct these tests. Since there may be important group 
differences in regional brain activity during the MIST, a secondary whole brain analysis will be conducted using 
the contrast of interest (stress-control).  Analyses will be conducted using FMRIBs Local Analysis of Mixed 
Effects (FLAME 1).  All group level results will be thresholded at Z>2.3 using a corrected cluster threshold of 
p=0.05. 
Hypothesis 1C: The CD-OT group will report lower subjective anxiety and craving than the CD-PBO group. 
Analysis: A linear mixed effects model containing all serially measured time points will be used to assess the 
effects of OT versus placebo on each dependent variable. Restricted maximum likelihood (REML; Patterson and 
Thompson, 1971) methods will be used to estimate the fixed effects and variance components, and baseline 
values will be used as covariates in the regression models. The dependent variables anxiety and craving will be 
modeled separately. Within each family of dependent measures, the Type I error rate will be controlled using a 
post-hoc Bonferroni correction. The statistical analyses will be conducted using SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute 
Inc., Cary, NC, USA). 
Specific Aim 2:  Use an implicit facial affect recognition paradigm to determine the impact of cocaine dependence 
and oxytocin on amygdala activity in response to fearful faces. 
Hypothesis 2A: The CD-PBO group will exhibit greater amygdala activity in response to fearful faces than HC-
PBO group. 
Hypothesis 2B: Compared with the CD-PBO group, participants in the CD-OT group will exhibit lower amygdala 
activity in response to fearful faces. 
Data Analysis: Following preprocessing (described above), within-task data from individual participants will be 
analyzed with a fixed-effects general linear model (GLM), with each emotion (described below) modeled as a 
box-car function convolved with a double-gamma hemodynamic response function. The response period at the 
end of each block will also be modeled as a separate variable to remove effects of explicit decision making and 
response selection. The GLM procedure is repeated for each voxel with six movement parameters (3 rotation 
values in radian and 3 translation values in millimeter) included as covariates to control for the influence of head 
motion on the data. Following first-level analysis, subject-specific contrasts will be entered into second-level, 
random-effects analyses. Since the hypotheses associated with Specific Aim 2 explore amygdala activity, we 
will use a region of interest approach (ROI).  The BOLD signal from the left amygdala will be extracted using an 
anatomical mask generated by a 12-mm diameter sphere located in the center of the left amygdala using the 
MNI coordinates (x, y, z = -22, 0, -22). The percent signal change between the fearful and neutral conditions 
(contrast of interest) will be calculated for each participant. Separate random-effects one-way analysis of 
variance tests (ANOVA) will be used to test for the following group differences (Hypothesis 2A: CD-PBO vs. HC-
PBO) and (Hypothesis 2B: CD-PBO vs. CD-OT). Since human neuroimaging studies have found that other brain 
regions play a role in implicit emotional processing, including the right amygdala and insula (Davidson et al., 
1999; Shi et al., 2013), secondary analyses will also include these regions. In addition, OT may impact amygdala 
responding to happy faces (Domes, Heinrichs, Glascher, et al., 2007), therefore group differences in amygdala 
responding in the happy-neutral contrast may be explored in future analyses. For multiple comparisons that are 
not part of the hypothesis a priori, the Bonferroni correction will be used. In addition, contrasts of other pertinent 
baseline characteristics will be performed between groups.  If the groups differ significantly on any of these 
baseline characteristics, the corresponding variables will be used as covariates in the above analyses.  The 
statistical analyses will be conducted using SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). 
Power and Sample Size 
Specific Aim 1  
 
Power and sample size estimates for Hypotheses 1A and 1B were based on pilot data from the MIST (see 
Preliminary Studies). Based on these data we expect a between group difference (CD-PBO vs. HC-PBO) in the 
PPI beta estimate of OFC-amygdala connectivity of Δ=3.6 with a RMSE=4.0 (d = 0.9) (Cohen, 1988).  Assuming 
an effect similar to the pilot data, the total effective sample size would be 40 subjects per group to provide 80% 
power for a between groups study design with a type I error rate of 0.05.  
Power and sample size estimates for Hypothesis 1C were based on data from a double-blind placebo 
controlled pilot study of OT on stress reactivity to the Trier Social Stress Task in CD subjects. Based on these 
data we expect a between group difference in cocaine craving following the MIST of Δ=8.24 with a RMSE=11.03 

14 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
(d=0.75) (Cohen, 1988) and a subjective anxiety difference of Δ=1.07 with a RMSE=2.20 (d=0.49). As in the 
oxytocin pilot study, participants will be assessed at five time points (m), with an anticipated intraclass correlation 
coefficient of 0.78 for both craving and anxiety outcomes (ICC=0.78 & 0.79, respectively). The design effect, 
which accounts for the multiple correlated observation within each subject, is estimated to be 4.12 (DE= [1+(5-
1)0.78]) (Donner and Klar, 2000). Assuming independent observations and an effect similar to the pilot data for 
the anxiety response (d=0.48), the total effective sample size would be 140 subjects (35 CD and 35 controls per 
treatment arm) to provide 80% power with a type I error rate of 0.05. In a clustered setting, the sample size is 
Neffective = nm/DE where n is the number of participants required when m replications within participants are 
performed after accounting for the design effect (DE). For the study at hand, the total number of participants 
required is therefore estimated to be N=135 (=140*4/4.12), As such, our proposed sample size of 160 subjects 
(40 CD and 40 HC per treatment arm) should provide sufficient statistical power to detect the planned anxiety 
and craving responses to the MIST. To account for and estimated attrition rate of 45%, we will enroll 210 
participants in order to complete 160 scans. 
Specific Aim 2  
 
Power and sample size estimates were based on the literature.  Neuroimaging studies of patients with PTSD 
and trauma matched controls have found significant group differences in the BOLD signal change in the 
amygdala during implicit facial affect processing.  Based on data from these studies the appropriate effect size 
for our study ranges between 1.2-1.4 (Felmingham et al., 2010; Rauch et al., 2000).  To detect an effect size (f) 
of 1.2 with a type 1 error protection level of .05 and n´=19 will have power (1-ß) of .95 (Cohen, 1988).  As such, 
our proposed 40 participants per group should provide sufficient statistical power to detect group differences in 
the BOLD signal change in the amygdala during implicit facial affect processing. 
C3g. Design Considerations  
Education: Individual variability in cognitive skills (mental arithmetic) may impact the perception of the task as 
stressful or non-stressful. However, the MIST program includes an algorithm that ensures that the performance 
of each individual remains below 50%. In addition, groups will be matched by years of education.  Trauma 
Loads/Recall Bias: Childhood trauma has been shown to affect corticolimbic responses to aversive social cues 
and to OT administration (Dannlowski et al., 2012; Fan et al., 2014). Study participants will complete the CTQ. 
Scores on the CTQ may be used as covariates in the analyses.  Since the CTQ is a retrospective self-report 
assessment it is subject to recall bias. However, the psychometric properties of the CTQ are well established in 
healthy controls and cocaine-dependent populations. Sex: Sex differences have been found in stress-related 
corticolimbic brain activity in CD subjects and in amygdala responding in healthy controls (Domes, Heinrichs, 
Glascher, et al., 2007; Domes et al., 2010; Potenza et al., 2012). In our experience in recruiting CD subjects for 
similar research studies we anticipate that only 12-15% of the CD participants will be female, and therefore do 
not anticipated gender effects from washing out any potential group differences. Abstinence and Years of Use:  
Frequency and recency of drug use have been shown to affect drug craving and neuroregulatory stress systems 
(Fox et al., 2005).  Subjects will be asked to report their patterns of drug use in the 90 days prior to the study 
visit.  If there are significant group differences in these factors, they will be used as covariates in the analyses.  
Ovarian Hormones: Menstrual cycle phase, estrogen and progesterone levels can have a significant impact on 
drug seeking and craving (Evans et al., 2002; Feltenstein et al., 2007).  In addition, estrogen and progesterone 
levels may impact OT effects in corticolimbic brain regions (Choleris et al., 2008; Gimpl et al., 2002).  In order to 
determine the impact of these variables on study outcomes, , participants will be asked to complete a menstrual 
history diary and plasma estrogen and progesterone samples will be analyzed.  
C3h. Data Management  
 
The REDCap Study Database Version 4, supported by the South Carolina Clinical and Translational 
Research Institute (SCTR) at MUSC, will be used to capture data directly into an online database (Harris et al., 
2009). Auditing will occur quarterly by comparing a random sample of 10% of participant’s original datasheets to 
the values entered for those individuals in all data files. All of the neuroimaging data are automatically transferred 
to servers managed by CBI. Data will be stored on CBI password protected servers which receive daily data 
backups. 
C3i.Operational Plan and Research Timetable  

15 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
 
The first four months of the grant will be used for obtaining regulatory approvals, training and in-servicing 
CTRC staff and database creation.  We have on-going trials involving CD and healthy control populations, thus 
we have trained personnel and an active recruitment network. We anticipate no issues with study recruitment 
beginning by the fifth month of the first year and continuing throughout the ninth month of the fifth year allowing 
for a total of 53 months.  At a recruitment rate of approximately three participants per month, we should have no 
difficulty in completing the study in this time frame. Data analysis and manuscript preparation will take place 
during the last three months of the fifth year when recruitment has been completed. 
 
 
 
 
 
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS 
1. RISKS TO THE SUBJECTS 
1.1 Human Subject Involvement and Characteristics 
 
Admission into the study is open to men and women and to all racial and ethnic groups, aged 18-65. We will 
scan 160 study participants including (1) cocaine-dependent (CD) individuals (n=80) and (2) healthy control (HC) 
subjects free of major Axis I diagnoses (n=80). Inclusion/exclusion criteria are listed below: 
General Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
Inclusion Criteria 
1. Age 18-65.  
2. Subjects must be able to provide informed consent and function at an intellectual level sufficient to allow 
accurate completion of all assessment instruments. 
3. Subjects must consent to remain abstinent from all drugs of abuse (except nicotine) for the three-day 
period immediately prior to the study visit. 
4. Subjects must consent to random assignment. 
5. Subjects must have a negative breathalyzer, urine drug screen at the study visit. 
6. Subjects must consent to the study visit which includes an outpatient visit to the ASD and completing one 
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning session. 
Exclusion Criteria 
1. Subjects with evidence of or a history of significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, 
renal, gastrointestinal, or neurological disease including diabetes. 
2. Subjects with a history of or current psychotic disorder or bipolar affective disorder. 
3. Subjects with current major depressive disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder. 
4. Subjects taking any psychotropic medications, including SSRI’s or other antidepressants, opiates or 
opiate antagonists. Subjects taking trazodone or non-benzodiazepene hypnotics for sleep will be 
included. 
5. Women who are pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential and not practicing an effective means of 
birth control. 
6. Subjects who have a BMI that would proclude them from fitting comfortably in the scanner.  
7. Persons with ferrous metal implants or pacemaker. 
8. Subjects that are claustrophobic. 
9. Subjects with significant psychiatric or medical problems that would impair participation or limit ability to 
complete the scanning session. 
10. Subjects that require maintenance or acute treatment with any psychoactive medication including anti-
seizure medications which could potentially interfere with fMRI data acquisition. 
Group – Specific Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 

16 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Individuals with Cocaine Dependence 
Inclusion Criteria 
1. Subjects must meet DSM-5 criteria for current (three months prior to study visit) moderate to severe 
cocaine use disorder. Individuals may meet criteria for marijuana use disorder, but they must not meet 
criteria for substance use disorder for any other substance (except nicotine and marijuana) within the 60 
days prior to study participation. Due to the high comorbidity of alcohol and cocaine use disorder 
individuals with alcohol use disorder will be included in the study if they do not require medically 
supervised detoxification.   
Exclusion Criteria  
1. Subjects meeting DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorder (other than nicotine, cocaine, marijuana or 
alcohol) within the 60 days prior to study participation. 
Healthy Controls 
Inclusion Criteria 
1. As above. 
Exclusion Criteria 
1. Subjects meeting DSM-5 criteria for current or lifetime moderate to severe substance use disorder on 
any drugs of abuse (except nicotine and marijuana). 
2. Subjects meeting DSM-5 criteria for marijuana use disorder within the last year. 
3. Subjects with a current ( past month) major depression or post-traumatic stress disorder. 
1.2 Sources of Materials 
 
Research materials obtained from indiviudual subjects includes structured clinical interviews, questionnaires, 
blood samples, urine drug screens, urine pregnancy tests, breathalyzer tests, structural and functional MRI 
scans.  
1.3 Potential Risks  
 
Risks associated with the assessment include the possibility that subjects might be upset by questions 
related to their substance use and psychiatric history. Risks associated with venipuncture may be mild pain and 
possible bruising. Under certain conditions, participants may experience psychological discomfort from a positive 
pregnancy test. There are very few potential risks from fMRI itself. There is no exposure to ionizing radiation and 
the machine and scanning sequences and gradients are approved by the FDA for routine clinical use. Individuals 
who are claustrophobic might experience anxiety during the scanning procedures. However, we will pre-select 
individuals who, in general, do not have this problem. A patient may experience some loud noises during the 
scanning procedure and there is a mild risk of hearing damage if patients are not given hearing protection. 
Participants may experience psychological discomfort from undergoing the scanning procedure, such as 
boredom and fatigue.  Ferrous objects in the body that are undetected could move during scans. This could lead 
to tissue damage and hemorrhage. The MIST is designed to induce a stress response, and therefore subjects 
are likely to experience some psychological discomfort. In addition, cocaine-dependent individuals could 
experience cocaine craving, therefore cocaine use after the study visit is a potential risk. Adverse effects 
associated with systemic oxytocin use in pregnancy include seizures, mental disturbances, unexpected bleeding 
or contraction of the uterus.  However, several studies have been conducted in men and women who are not 
pregnant with intranasal doses between 20 and 60 IU, and no side effects have been reported (Bruins et al., 
1992; Fehm-Wolfsdorf et al., 1988). A review by MacDonald and colleagues (2011) also found no adverse 
outcomes associated with oxytocin dosages of 18-40 IU for short term use in controlled research settings 
(MacDonald et al., 2011). To date, our research group has adminsted intranasal oxytocin to over 150 cocaine-
dependent individuals and healthy controls with no side effects. These risks are outlined in the informed consent 
documents.   
2. ADEQUACY OF PROTECTION AGAINST RISKS 
2.1 Recruitment and Informed Consent 
 
Medical records will not be reviewed to identify potential study participants.  We will recruit “healthy adults” 
and “cocaine users” through multiple sources, including advertisements in local media via television, newspaper, 

17 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
the internet and word of mouth among subjects. Flyers and advertisement will be not be used until they have 
been reviewed and approved by the MUSC Institutional Review Board (IRB).  Secondary recruitment sites for 
participants will include (1) patients referred from the MUSC Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs (CDAP), and 
(2) individuals presenting to the Charleston Center for inpatient or outpatient treatment. Informed consent (IC) 
will be collected at the study research offices, in a private and interruption-free environment. The study PI, a Co-
I, or other qualified study staff will obtain informed IC. The IC form includes a detailed description of the study 
procedures, risks and also statements regarding participants’ rights to withdraw from the study at any time 
without consequences. The IC form will specifically review the potential for psychological distresss, risks 
associated with MRI and oxytocin that may occur as a result of study participation. The IC will also inform 
individuals that the scanner is located on-campus at a research facility and not at a clinical facility, therefore 
immediate emergency medical services may not be available. The IC form will be explained to individuals using 
language that is easy-to-understand and individuals will be instructed to read the form carefully prior to signing 
it. The IC form will include emergency contact information for the PI (Dr. McRae-Clark). Any questions pertaing 
to the study or consent will be answered. Potential participants will not be required to make a decision to 
participate at this initial contact, though that possibility will be available. If individuals wish to discuss study 
participation with their family and/or significant others, they will be encouraged to do so. Consent will be 
documented by the signature of the participant on the informed consent agreement, accompanied by the 
signature of the individual obtaining the consent. 
2.2 Protections Against Risks 
 
All study participants will be closely monitored for psychiatric and medical stability. The research team 
includes two board certified psychiatrists (Drs. Brady and Hartwell) who are available to monitor study 
participants for psychiatric stability. Dr. McRae-Clark and an on-call physician will be be available by pager/cell 
telephone during the entire study for any questions or emergencies that may arise. Our past research experience 
suggests that data collection using many of these same assessments and questionnaires can be conducted 
without undue psychological distress. Efforts will be made to protect the confidential nature of the information 
collected; however, this cannot be guaranteed (e.g., subpoena). This experience includes substantial research 
with victims of rape and other forms of violence, individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder, substance-
dependent individuals, healthy controls, and work on large-scale studies asking questions about similar topics. 
There are well-established protocols at our site for emergency psychiatric evaluation, crisis intervention and/or 
psychiatric hospitalization for suicidal, homicidal, psychotic or other acutely distressed subjects. Immediately on 
detection of these needs, the assessor will page a psychiatrist to review the subject’s situation. In addition, all 
study personnel will be trained to assess suicide risk. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview will be 
used to assess suicidal ideation and intent. If ideation and intent are identified, the PI and a psychiatrist will be 
notified immediately. The psychiatrist will personally evaluate the subject and, arrange for hospitalization if 
necessary. At the conclusion of the study visit, each participant will be debriefed and provided with full disclosure 
about the deception of the MIST. Subjects will be told that the computer makes adjustments to keep the number 
of correct responses to less than 50% and therefore a good score on the task is impossible. If appropriate, the 
psychiatrist will personally evaluate the subject. Should any craving or anxiety induced during the experimental 
manipulation fail to subside within 3-4 hours, study psychiatrists will be available to arrange either hospitalization 
through the MUSC CDAP or make an appropriate referral. These protective procedures are in place for all of our 
on-going research studies of stress reactivity in substance-dependent populations.  
 
All sessions will be conducted under the supervision of experienced personnel. The research team and all 
of the study staff will have succesfully completed the Miami Collaborative IRB Training Initiative (CITI) course 
and its associated tests in research ethics. To ensure confidentiality, each participant will be assigned a unique 
identification number and all information will be collected under that number. Identification numbers linked with 
names will be retained separately from the data files and locked in a different cabinet. Only the investigators will 
have access to the master lists of codes. No names or personal identifiers will be included in the data files. Files 
will be stored in the Addiction Sciences Division, in an office that is locked when not in use. Blood samples will 
be stored in the IOP’s Clinical Neurobiology Laboratory. Structural and functional neuroimaging data will be 
stored on a secure password protected server maintained by the MUSC Center for Biomedical Imaging (CBI). 
Only the PI,Co-I’s, and study staff will have access to files on the server. Care will be taken to prevent disclosure 
of pregnancy tests or any other lab results to anyone other than the study participant. 
 
 

18 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
 
The IOP Clinical Neurobiology Laboratory staff have extensive experience in venipuncture, thus any pain 
and bruising that occur as a result of the venipuncture are likely to be mild and transient. The instrumentation 
used for physiological recordings, meets all safety standards for non-invasive recordings and AC-powered 
devices are located out of the study participants’ reach. Urine pregnancy tests are routinely used in all of our 
clinical research studies. In the event that a pregnancy test is positive, the results will be disclosed to the 
participant by the PI or Co-I and if necessary the participant will be given an appropriate referral for counseling.  
 
All of the study staff will be required to complete the CBI MRI safety training class. The course is taught by 
an AART (American Registry of Radiologic Technologists) registered technician. The staff will be trained about 
safety in the MRI environment, and how to screen oneself and others. The staff will also have knowledge of 
safety procedures for entering the scanner facility, safely removing participants from the scanner, when and how 
to quench the magnet and basic emergency procedures including emergency contact information.  Standard 
operating procedures for emergency situations are located on-site. The technician and the PI are authorized to 
operate the equipment and will be present throughout the scanning sessions.  Although there are no known risks 
of MRI scanning to a developing fetus at 3.0 T, the possibility that risks could be discovered in the future cannot 
be ignored. Urine pregnancy tests will be used to exclude pregnant women from study participation.  A careful 
metal screening history will be taken from each subject to assess the possibility of metal devices/implants and 
will be reviewed by the PI, MRI technician and/or clinical staff who have had extensive training and experience 
with MRI safety. If the screening yields information that raises a question of safety, the subject will be asked to 
provide the appropriate documentation (i.e. film) before they are allowed to participate. Study participants will 
complete the metal screening questionnaire at each scanning visit. In addition, participants will be asked to 
empty their pockets and will be screened with a hand-held ferromagnetic-detector wand.  Subjects will wear 
earplugs and sound-dampening headphones to decrease the intensity of the scanner noise. Prior exposure to 
pictures of the scanner, getting into the scanner and seeing others in the scanner often reduces psychological 
discomfort or identifies people for whom scanning is not appropriate.  If abnormalities in the brain images are 
found, the subjects will be referred to an appropriate clinical care provider.  
 
 
Subjects will be taught about the potential side effects of oxytocin. Pregnancy tests will be performed at the 
study visit for women of childbearing potential. The pregnancy test will occur before the participants receive the 
intranasal spray. Oxytocin administration will occur in a fully staffed clinical environment with emergency 
medications (i.e., IM diphenhydramine, alprazolam) and equipment available as needed. All subjects will be 
informed at the onset that they may terminate study participation at any time without reprocussions. 
3. POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED RESEARCH TO THE SUBJECT AND OTHERS  
 
There are no guarantees of specific benefits to individual study participants. However, potential benefits 
include a detailed psychiatric and substance use assessment and referral for treatment if requested. In addition, 
subjects may benefit from the realization that, through their study participation, they are helping to advance our 
state of knowledge regarding the neurobiologic factors that underscore stress induced drug craving and relapse. 
Currently there are no FDA approved medications for the treatment of cocaine dependence. An investigation of 
oxytocin’s effects on subjective anxiety and craving in cocaine-dependent individuals may provide important 
information that can guide treatment for future patients with cocaine dependence. While the benefits to the 
individual patient are minimal, the minimal risks are reasonable in relation to the benefits to be gained from the 
investigation.  
4. IMPORTANCE OF THE KNOWLEDGE TO BE GAINED 
 
This study may provide important information that can improve treatment for future patients with cocaine and 
other substance use disorders. The minimal risks of the investigation are considered reasonable in relation to 
the expected knowledge to be gained. 
5. DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING PLAN (DSMP) 
 
This section is based on the recommendations found in the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 
“Guidelines for Developing a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan” (www.drugabuse.gov/funding/dsmbsop.html). A 
detailed DSMP will be developed and approved by NIH program staff prior to study initiation. 
5.1 Summary of the Protocol 

19 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
 
The primary objective of this proposal is to identifying the neurobiologic substrates of emotion related 
behavior in cocaine-dependent populations. Groups of cocaine-dependent and healthy non-dependent controls 
will receive either intranasal oxytocin (24 IU) or placebo spray prior to participating in a single fMRI scanning 
session.  During the scanning session participants will complete the Montreal Imaging Stress Task and an implicit 
facial affect recognition task.  The primary outcomes of interest are (1) functional connectivity between the 
amygdala and prefrontal cortical brain regions during the stress condition of the MIST; (2) subjective anxiety and 
craving responses to the MIST and (3) the BOLD signal in the amygdala in response to implicit fearful faces. 
5.2 Trial Management  
 
The study will be managed from the Addiction Sciences Division within the Department of Psychiatry and 
Behavioral Sciences at the Medical University of South Carolina.  The target population is described above in 
the inclusion/exclusion criteria. 
5.3 Data Management and Analysis 
 
Data will be entered by research assistants directly into a computer using standard database software using 
REDCap.  Neuroimaging data will be stored and analyzed on the CBI’s password protected server. The data 
analysis plan is outlined in the Data Analysis Plan section.  
5.4 Quality Assurance 
 
Quarterly data audits, overseen by the PI will be conducted.  Confidentiality protections are outlined above. 
5.5 Regulatory Issues 
 
We currently have an active IND from the FDA for the use of oxytocin in cocaine-dependent and healthy 
controls with a history of childhood adversity who are free of Axis I diagnoses (IND 109,726). Potential conflicts 
of interest will be reported using NIH guidelines outlined in “Issuance of the Final Rule - Responsibility of 
Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research for which Public Health Service Funding is Sought and 
Responsible Prospective Contractors” for disclosure. All unexpected Adverse Events (AEs) will be reported to 
the MUSC Committee on Human Research and NIDA within 48-business hours. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) 
will be reported within 24-business hours.  Follow-up of all unexpected and serious AEs will also be reported to 
these agencies. All AEs will be reviewed by the PI and yearly by the IRB. Any significant actions taken by the 
local IRB and protocol changes will be relayed to NIDA. AEs and SAEs occurring during the course of the project 
will be collected, documented, and reported in accordance with the protocol and IRB reporting requirements. All 
research staff involved with AE reporting will receive general and protocol specific AE/SAE training including 
identification, assessment, evaluation, documentation, and reporting. The research assistant, study coordinator, 
or the PI will identify any potential AEs and SAEs during the course of the study. This information will be provided 
to the study physician, who will be responsible for AE/SAE assessment and evaluation including a determination 
of seriousness and study relatedness.  
5.6 Definition of AE and SAE 
 
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any unwanted change, physically, psychologically or behaviorally, that 
occurs in a study participant during the course of the study that may or may not be related to study participation.  
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as an adverse event that has one of the following outcomes: 
• 
Results in death 
• 
Is life-threatening 
• 
Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization 
• 
Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity 
• 
Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect  
• 
Requires intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes 
5.7 Documentation and Reporting 
 
AEs/SAEs will be documented and reported as per protocol and IRB requirements.  Research staff will 
identify AEs and obtain all available information to assess severity, seriousness, study relatedness, 
expectedness, outcome and the need for change or discontinuation in the study intervention.  Adverse events 
will be documented on AE Logs and AE Case Report Forms (CRFs).  Additional relevant AE information if 
available will be documented in a progress note in the research record as appropriate to allow monitoring and 

20 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
evaluating of the AE.  All AEs will be reported to the IRB online as soon as possible, but no later than 10 working 
days after the investigator first learns of the event.  The MUSC IRB AE reporting requirements are as follows:  
All deaths that occur during the study or 30 days post termination from the study are required to be reported as 
adverse events even if they are expected or unrelated.  Other adverse events are reportable to the MUSC IRB 
if the AE is unexpected AND related or possibly related AND serious or more prevalent than expected.  All three 
criteria must be met for an AE to be reported to the MUSC IRB.  The IRB definition of unexpected is that the AE 
is not identified in nature, severity or frequency in the current protocol, informed consent, investigator brochure 
or with other current risk information.  The definition of related is that there is a reasonable possibility that the 
adverse event may have been caused by the drug, device or intervention.  Reportable AEs are reviewed by the 
IRB Chair and reported to the IRB Board at the next meeting. If the AE meets the definition for serious, 
appropriate SAE protocol specific reporting forms will be completed and disseminated to the appropriate persons 
and within the designated timeframes as indicated above.  For each AE/SAE recorded, the research staff will 
follow the AE/SAE until resolution, stabilization or until the participant is no longer in the study as stated in the 
protocol. When a reportable SAE is identified, the research staff will notify the MUSC IRB within 24-hours and 
complete the AE report form in conjunction with the PI. If complete information is not available when the initial 
24-hour SAE report is disseminated, follow-up information will be gathered to enable a complete assessment 
and outcome of the event.  This information may include hospital discharge records, autopsy reports, clinic 
records, etc.  The research staff will attach copies of source documents to the SAE report for review by the PI 
and study clinicians (Co-Is).  These source documents will be forwarded to the NIH program officer as 
appropriate within 2-weeks of the initial SAE report.  In addition, the PI will provide a signed, dated SAE summary 
report, which will be sent to the designated NIH Institutional Medical Safety Officer within two weeks of the initial 
SAE report. 
 
The MUSC IRB meets monthly and is located on-campus at 165 Cannon Street, Rm. 501, Charleston SC, 29425. 
Communication with the IRB will be through email, memos, official IRB forms, and online reporting. 
 
5.8 Trial Safety 
 
The potential benefits, risks and methods to minimize risks are outlined above. Protocols for reporting AEs 
and SAEs are outlined above.  All unexpected AEs and SAEs will be monitored until resolved.  A detailed 
summary of all AEs will be prepared weekly by the research staff.  Study procedures will follow the FDA’s Good 
Clinical Practice Guidelines (www.fda.gov/oc/gcp). Any outside requests for information or any breaches in 
confidentiality will be reported to the PI.  All requests by participant’s physicians and other medical providers will 
be referred directly to the PI and the study clinicians (Co-Is). 
5.9 Trial Efficacy 
 
This is not an intervention trial.  An interim analysis is not planned at the time. 
5.10 Risk Benefit Ratio 
 
While the benefits to the individual participant are minimal, the minimal risks are reasonable in relation to the 
benefits to be gained from the investigation. Potential risks of concern are loss of confidentiality, and adverse 
events to oxytocin. The assessments and questionnaires are non-invasive and have inherently minimal risks. 
The potential risks of MRI are minimal. As discussed above, our research team has extensive experience with 
these study populations, psychiatric assessments, fMRI, oxytocin administration, the MIST and will attempt to 
minimize these risks. Knowledge gained by the proposed study would help fill an important void in our 
understanding neurobiologic substrates of stress and fear in individuals with cocaine dependence.  
6. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REQUIREMENTS 
 
In accordance with Public Law 110-85, this project will be registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol 
Registration System Information Website prior to study initiation. 
 
 
 
 

21 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES CITED 
 
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (1994). Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions 
following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372(6507), 669-672.  
Aggleton, J. P., Burton, M. J., & Passingham, R. E. (1980). Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of 
the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Brain Res, 190(2), 347-368. doi: 0006-8993(80)90279-6 [pii] 
American Psychiatric Association (Ed.). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington, 
VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. 
Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., Kubiak, P., Valentino, R. J., & Shipley, M. T. (1996). Role of the locus coeruleus 
in emotional activation. Prog Brain Res, 107, 379-402.  
Back, S. E., Brady, K. T., Waldrop, A. E., Yeatts, S. D., McRae, A. L., & Spratt, E. (2008). Early life trauma and 
sensitivity to current life stressors in individuals with and without cocaine dependence. Am J Drug Alcohol 
Abuse, 34(4), 389-396. 
Banks, S. J., Eddy, K. T., Angstadt, M., Nathan, P. J., & Phan, K. L. (2007). Amygdala-frontal connectivity during 
emotion regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2(4), 303-312.  
Bartz, J., Simeon, D., Hamilton, H., Kim, S., Crystal, S., Braun, A., Vicens, V., & Hollander, E. (2011). Oxytocin 
can hinder trust and cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 6(5), 556-
563.  
Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. N. (2011). Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and 
person matter. Trends Cogn Sci, 15(7), 301-309.  
Beauregard, M., Levesque, J., & Bourgouin, P. (2001). Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion. 
J Neurosci, 21(18), RC165.  
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Brown, G.K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: 
Psychological Corporation. 
Bernstein, D. P., Fink, L., Handelsman, L., Foote, J., Lovejoy, M., Wenzel, K., Sapareto, E., & Ruggiero, J. 
(1994). Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. Am J 
Psychiatry, 151(8), 1132-1136.  
Bernstein, D. P., Fink, L.A. (1998). Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-Report Manual. San 
Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation. 
Blair, R. J. (2003). Facial expressions, their communicatory functions and neuro-cognitive substrates. Philos 
Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Am, 358, 561-572.  
Blair, R. J., Morris, J. S., Frith, C. D., Perrett, D. I., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). Dissociable neural responses to facial 
expressions of sadness and anger. Brain, 122 ( Pt 5), 883-893.  
Boccia, M. L., Petrusz, P., Suzuki, K., Marson, L., & Pedersen, C. A. (2013). Immunohistochemical localization 
of oxytocin receptors in human brain. Neuroscience, 253, 155-164.  
Brady, K. T., McRae, A. L., Moran-Santa Maria, M. M., DeSantis, S. M., Simpson, A. N., Waldrop, A. E., Back, 
S. E., & Kreek, M. J. (2009). Response to corticotropin-releasing hormone infusion in cocaine-dependent 
individuals. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 66(4), 422-430.  
Breiter, H. C., Etcoff, N. L., Whalen, P. J., Kennedy, W. A., Rauch, S. L., Buckner, R. L., Strauss, M. M., Hyman, 
S. E., & Rosen, B. R. (1996). Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing 
of facial expression. Neuron, 17(5), 875-887.  
Cardoso, C., Linnen, A. M., Joober, R., & Ellenbogen, M. A. (2012). Coping style moderates the effect of 
intranasal oxytocin on the mood response to interpersonal stress. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 20(2), 84-
91.  
Carmichael, S. T., & Price, J. L. (1995). Limbic connections of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in macaque 
monkeys. J Comp Neurol, 363(4), 615-641.  

22 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Carpenter, L. L., Carvalho, J. P., Tyrka, A. R., Wier, L. M., Mello, A. F., Mello, M. F., Anderson, G. M., Wilkinson, 
C. W., & Price, L. H. (2007). Decreased adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol responses to stress in 
healthy adults reporting significant childhood maltreatment. Biol Psychiatry, 62(10), 1080-1087.  
Carson, D. S., Cornish, J. L., Guastella, A. J., Hunt, G. E., & McGregor, I. S. (2010). Oxytocin decreases 
methamphetamine 
self-administration, 
methamphetamine 
hyperactivity, 
and 
relapse 
to 
methamphetamine-seeking behaviour in rats. Neuropharmacology, 58(1), 38-43.  
Carver C. You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief cope. International Journal 
of Behavioral Medicine. 1997;4:92-100.Carter, C. S. (1992). Oxytocin and sexual behavior. Neurosci 
Biobehav Rev, 16(2), 131-144.  
Chang, S. W., Barter, J. W., Ebitz, R. B., Watson, K. K., & Platt, M. L. (2012). Inhaled oxytocin amplifies both 
vicarious reinforcement and self reinforcement in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Proc Natl Acad 
Sci U S A, 109(3), 959-964.  
Childress, A. R., McLellan, A. T., & O'Brien, C. P. (1986). Conditioned responses in a methadone population. A 
comparison of laboratory, clinic, and natural settings. J Subst Abuse Treat, 3(3), 173-179.  
Childress, A. R., Mozley, P. D., McElgin, W., Fitzgerald, J., Reivich, M., & O'Brien, C. P. (1999). Limbic activation 
during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry, 156(1), 11-18.  
Choleris, E., Clipperton, A. E., Phan, A., & Kavaliers, M. (2008). Estrogen receptor beta agonists in 
neurobehavioral investigations. Curr Opin Investig Drugs, 9(7), 760-773.  
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavorial Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: 
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 
Cohen‚ S, Memelstein‚ R, Kamarck‚ T, & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social 
support. In I. G. S. B. Sarason (Ed.), Social support: Theory‚ research and application (pp. 73-94). Leiden, 
The Netherlands: The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience 
Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety, 18(2), 76-82.  
Critchley, H., Daly, E., Phillips, M., Brammer, M., Bullmore, E., Williams, S., Van Amelsvoort, T., Robertson, D., 
David, A., & Murphy, D. (2000). Explicit and implicit neural mechanisms for processing of social 
information from facial expressions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp, 
9(2), 93-105.  
Cronkite, R. C., & Moos, R. H. (1984). The role of predisposing and moderating factors in the stress-illness 
relationship. J Health Soc Behav, 25(4), 372-393.  
Cui, S. S., Bowen, R. C., Gu, G. B., Hannesson, D. K., Yu, P. H., & Zhang, X. (2001). Prevention of cannabinoid 
withdrawal syndrome by lithium: involvement of oxytocinergic neuronal activation. J Neurosci, 21(24), 
9867-9876.  
Dannlowski, U., Stuhrmann, A., Beutelmann, V., Zwanzger, P., Lenzen, T., Grotegerd, D., Domschke, K., Hohoff, 
C., Ohrmann, P., Bauer, J., Lindner, C., Postert, C., Konrad, C., Arolt, V., Heindel, W., Suslow, T., & 
Kugel, H. (2012). Limbic scars: long-term consequences of childhood maltreatment revealed by 
functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry, 71(4), 286-293.  
Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends Cogn 
Sci, 3(1), 11-21.  
De Dreu, C. K., Greer, L. L., Van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. J. (2011). Oxytocin promotes human 
ethnocentrism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108(4), 1262-1266.  
de Oliveira, D. C., Zuardi, A. W., Graeff, F. G., Queiroz, R. H., & Crippa, J. A. (2012). Anxiolytic-like effect of 
oxytocin in the simulated public speaking test. J Psychopharmacol, 26(4), 497-504.  
Dedovic, K., Renwick, R., Mahani, N. K., Engert, V., Lupien, S. J., & Pruessner, J. C. (2005). The Montreal 
Imaging Stress Task: using functional imaging to investigate the effects of perceiving and processing 
psychosocial stress in the human brain. J Psychiatry Neurosci, 30(5), 319-325.  
DeFrank, R. S., Jenkins, C. D., & Rose, R. M. (1987). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships among 
alcohol consumption, psychosocial factors, and blood pressure. Psychosom Med, 49(3), 236-249.  

23 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Dodhia, S., Hosanagar, A., Fitzgerald, D. A., Labuschagne, I., Wood, A. G., Nathan, P. J., & Phan, K. L. (2014). 
Modulation of Resting-State Amygdala-Frontal Functional Connectivity by Oxytocin in Generalized Social 
Anxiety Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology.  
Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Glascher, J., Buchel, C., Braus, D. F., & Herpertz, S. C. (2007). Oxytocin attenuates 
amygdala responses to emotional faces regardless of valence. Biol Psychiatry, 62(10), 1187-1190.  
Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S. C. (2007). Oxytocin improves "mind-reading" in 
humans. Biol Psychiatry, 61(6), 731-733.  
Domes, G., Lischke, A., Berger, C., Grossmann, A., Hauenstein, K., Heinrichs, M., & Herpertz, S. C. (2010). 
Effects of intranasal oxytocin on emotional face processing in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(1), 
83-93.  
Dougherty, D. D., Shin, L. M., Alpert, N. M., Pitman, R. K., Orr, S. P., Lasko, M., Macklin, M. L., Fischman, A. J., 
& Rauch, S. L. (1999). Anger in healthy men: a PET study using script-driven imagery. Biol Psychiatry, 
46(4), 466-472.  
Ebitz, R. B., Watson, K. K., & Platt, M. L. (2013). Oxytocin blunts social vigilance in the rhesus macaque. Proc 
Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110(28), 11630-11635.  
Ehrlich, I., Humeau, Y., Grenier, F., Ciocchi, S., Herry, C., & Luthi, A. (2009). Amygdala inhibitory circuits and 
the control of fear memory. Neuron, 62(6), 757-771.  
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V. (1976). Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. 
Erb, S., Hitchcott, P. K., Rajabi, H., Mueller, D., Shaham, Y., & Stewart, J. (2000). Alpha-2 adrenergic receptor 
agonists block stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking. Neuropsychopharmacology, 23(2), 138-
150.  
Evans, S. M., Haney, M., & Foltin, R. W. (2002). The effects of smoked cocaine during the follicular and luteal 
phases of the menstrual cycle in women. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 159(4), 397-406.  
Fan, Y., Herrera-Melendez, A. L., Pestke, K., Feeser, M., Aust, S., Otte, C., Pruessner, J. C., Boker, H., Bajbouj, 
M., & Grimm, S. (2014). Early life stress modulates amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity: 
Implications for oxytocin effects. Hum Brain Mapp.  
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. 
S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of 
death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med, 14(4), 245-258.  
Felmingham, K., Williams, L. M., Kemp, A. H., Liddell, B., Falconer, E., Peduto, A., & Bryant, R. (2010). Neural 
responses to masked fear faces: sex differences and trauma exposure in posttraumatic stress disorder. 
J Abnorm Psychol, 119(1), 241-247.  
Feltenstein, M. W., & See, R. E. (2007). Plasma progesterone levels and cocaine-seeking in freely cycling female 
rats across the estrous cycle. Drug Alcohol Depend, 89(2-3), 183-189.  
Ferguson, J. N., Aldag, J. M., Insel, T. R., & Young, L. J. (2001). Oxytocin in the medial amygdala is essential 
for social recognition in the mouse. J Neurosci, 21(20), 8278-8285.  
Fischer-Shofty, M., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Harari, H., & Levkovitz, Y. (2010). The effect of intranasal 
administration of oxytocin on fear recognition. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 179-184.  
Fox, H. C., Bergquist, K. L., Casey, J., Hong, K. A., & Sinha, R. (2011). Selective cocaine-related difficulties in 
emotional intelligence: relationship to stress and impulse control. Am J Addict, 20(2), 151-160.  
Fox, H. C., Talih, M., Malison, R., Anderson, G. M., Kreek, M. J., & Sinha, R. (2005). Frequency of recent cocaine 
and alcohol use affects drug craving and associated responses to stress and drug-related cues. 
Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(9), 880-891.  
Franklin, T. R., Acton, P. D., Maldjian, J. A., Gray, J. D., Croft, J. R., Dackis, C. A., O'Brien, C. P., & Childress, 
A. R. (2002). Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal 
cortices of cocaine patients. Biol Psychiatry, 51(2), 134-142.  
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997). Psychophysiological and 
modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 6(3), 218-229.  
Ghashghaei, H. T., Hilgetag, C. C., & Barbas, H. (2007). Sequence of information processing for emotions based 
on the anatomic dialogue between prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Neuroimage, 34(3), 905-923.  
Gimpl, G., Wiegand, V., Burger, K., & Fahrenholz, F. (2002). Cholesterol and steroid hormones: modulators of 
oxytocin receptor function. Prog Brain Res, 139, 43-55.  

24 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Goldstein, R. Z., & Volkow, N. D. (2011). Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings 
and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci, 12(11), 652-669. doi: 10.1038/nrn3119 
Grant, S., London, E. D., Newlin, D. B., Villemagne, V. L., Liu, X., Contoreggi, C., Phillips, R. L., Kimes, A. S., & 
Margolin, A. (1996). Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci 
U S A, 93(21), 12040-12045.  
Gu, H., Salmeron, B. J., Ross, T. J., Geng, X., Zhan, W., Stein, E. A., & Yang, Y. (2010). Mesocorticolimbic 
circuits are impaired in chronic cocaine users as demonstrated by resting-state functional connectivity. 
Neuroimage, 53(2), 593-601.  
Guastella, A. J., Mitchell, P. B., & Mathews, F. (2008). Oxytocin enhances the encoding of positive social 
memories in humans. Biol Psychiatry, 64(3), 256-258.  
Hall, S. M., Havassy, B. E., & Wasserman, D. A. (1991). Effects of commitment to abstinence, positive moods, 
stress, and coping on relapse to cocaine use. J Consult Clin Psychol, 59(4), 526-532.  
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data 
capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational 
research informatics support. J Biomed Inform, 42(2), 377-381.  
Hartwell, K. J., Johnson, K. A., Li, X., Myrick, H., LeMatty, T., George, M. S., & Brady, K. T. (2011). Neural 
correlates of craving and resisting craving for tobacco in nicotine dependent smokers. Addict Biol, 16(4), 
654-666.  
Hartwell, K. J., Lematty, T., McRae-Clark, A. L., Gray, K. M., George, M. S., & Brady, K. T. (2013). Resisting the 
urge to smoke and craving during a smoking quit attempt on varenicline: results from a pilot fMRI study. 
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 39(2), 92-98.  
Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Social support and oxytocin interact to 
suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biol Psychiatry, 54(12), 1389-1398.  
Holland, P. C., & Gallagher, M. (1999). Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes. Trends 
Cogn Sci, 3(2), 65-73.  
Huber, D., Veinante, P., & Stoop, R. (2005). Vasopressin and oxytocin excite distinct neuronal populations in the 
central amygdala. Science, 308(5719), 245-248.  
Hughes, J. R., & Hatsukami, D. (1986). Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 43(3), 
289-294.  
Hulka, L. M., Preller, K. H., Vonmoos, M., Broicher, S. D., & Quednow, B. B. (2013). Cocaine users manifest 
impaired prosodic and cross-modal emotion processing. Front Psychiatry, 4, 98.  
Hurlemann, R., Walter, H., Rehme, A. K., Kukolja, J., Santoro, S. C., Schmidt, C., Schnell, K., Musshoff, F., 
Keysers, C., Maier, W., Kendrick, K. M., & Onur, O. A. (2010). Human amygdala reactivity is diminished 
by the beta-noradrenergic antagonist propranolol. Psychol Med, 40(11), 1839-1848.  
Hyman, S. M., Paliwal, P., Chaplin, T. M., Mazure, C. M., Rounsaville, B. J., & Sinha, R. (2008). Severity of 
childhood trauma is predictive of cocaine relapse outcomes in women but not men. Drug Alcohol Depend, 
92(1-3), 208-216.  
Hyman, S. M., Paliwal, P., & Sinha, R. (2007). Childhood maltreatment, perceived stress, and stress-related 
coping in recently abstinent cocaine dependent adults. Psychol Addict Behav, 21(2), 233-238.  
Insel, T. R., & Shapiro, L. E. (1992). Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous 
and polygamous voles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 89(13), 5981-5985.  
Insel, T. R., & Winslow, J. T. (1991). Central administration of oxytocin modulates the infant rat's response to 
social isolation. Eur J Pharmacol, 203(1), 149-152.  
Joseph, J. E., Liu, X., Jiang, Y., Lynam, D., & Kelly, T. H. (2009). Neural correlates of emotional reactivity in 
sensation seeking. Psychol Sci, 20(2), 215-223.  
Joseph, J. E., Swearingen, J. E., Clark, J. D., Benca, C. E., Collins, H. R., Corbly, C. R., Gathers, A. D., & Bhatt, 
R. S. (2012). The changing landscape of functional brain networks for face processing in typical 
development. Neuroimage, 63(3), 1223-1236.  
Kanner, R. M., & Foley, K. M. (1981). Patterns of narcotic drug use in a cancer pain clinic. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 
362, 161-172.  
Kemmis, L., Hall, J. K., Kingston, R., & Morgan, M. J. (2007). Impaired fear recognition in regular recreational 
cocaine users. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 194(2), 151-159.  

25 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Kendrick, K. M., Keverne, E. B., Hinton, M. R., & Goode, J. A. (1992). Oxytocin, amino acid and monoamine 
release in the region of the medial preoptic area and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of the sheep 
during parturition and suckling. Brain Res, 569(2), 199-209.  
Kilts, C. D., Schweitzer, J. B., Quinn, C. K., Gross, R. E., Faber, T. L., Muhammad, F., Ely, T. D., Hoffman, J. 
M., & Drexler, K. P. (2001). Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction. Arch Gen 
Psychiatry, 58(4), 334-341.  
Kim, M. J., & Whalen, P. J. (2009). The structural integrity of an amygdala-prefrontal pathway predicts trait 
anxiety. J Neurosci, 29(37), 11614-11618.  
Kirsch, P., Esslinger, C., Chen, Q., Mier, D., Lis, S., Siddhanti, S., Gruppe, H., Mattay, V. S., Gallhofer, B., & 
Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2005). Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. 
J Neurosci, 25(49), 11489-11493.  
Kirschbaum, C., Kudielka, B. M., Gaab, J., Schommer, N. C., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1999). Impact of gender, 
menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. 
Psychosom Med, 61(2), 154-162.  
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. 
Nature, 435(7042), 673-676. doi: 10.1038/nature03701 
Labuschagne, I., Phan, K. L., Wood, A., Angstadt, M., Chua, P., Heinrichs, M., Stout, J. C., & Nathan, P. J. 
(2010). Oxytocin attenuates amygdala reactivity to fear in generalized social anxiety disorder. 
Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(12), 2403-2413.  
LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci, 23, 155-184.  
Levenson, M.; Kiehl, K.; Fitzpatrick, C. (1995). "Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized 
population". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151-158. 
Levesque, J., Joanette, Y., Mensour, B., Beaudoin, G., Leroux, J. M., Bourgouin, P., & Beauregard, M. (2004). 
Neural basis of emotional self-regulation in childhood. Neuroscience, 129(2), 361-369.  
Li, C. S., Kosten, T. R., & Sinha, R. (2005). Sex differences in brain activation during stress imagery in abstinent 
cocaine users: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry, 57(5), 487-494.  
Light, K. C., Grewen, K. M., Amico, J. A., Boccia, M., Brownley, K. A., & Johns, J. M. (2004). Deficits in plasma 
oxytocin responses and increased negative affect, stress, and blood pressure in mothers with cocaine 
exposure during pregnancy. Addict Behav, 29(8), 1541-1564.  
Lynam, D.R., Smith, G.T., Whiteside, S.P., & Cyders, M.A. (2006). The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality 
pathways to impulsive behavior (Technical Report). West Lafayette: Purdue University. 
Macdonald, K., & Feifel, D. (2013). Helping oxytocin deliver: considerations in the development of oxytocin-
based therapeutics for brain disorders. Front Neurosci, 7, 35.  
Makris, N., Gasic, G. P., Seidman, L. J., Goldstein, J. M., Gastfriend, D. R., Elman, I., Albaugh, M. D., Hodge, 
S. M., Ziegler, D. A., Sheahan, F. S., Caviness, V. S., Jr., Tsuang, M. T., Kennedy, D. N., Hyman, S. E., 
Rosen, B. R., & Breiter, H. C. (2004). Decreased absolute amygdala volume in cocaine addicts. Neuron, 
44(4), 729-740.  
McDonald, A. J. (1998). Cortical pathways to the mammalian amygdala. Prog Neurobiol, 55(3), 257-332.  
McGregor, I. S., & Bowen, M. T. (2012). Breaking the loop: oxytocin as a potential treatment for drug addiction. 
Horm Behav, 61(3), 331-339.  
McHugh, M. J., Demers, C. H., Salmeron, B. J., Devous, M. D., Sr., Stein, E. A., & Adinoff, B. (2014). Cortico-
amygdala coupling as a marker of early relapse risk in cocaine-addicted individuals. Front Psychiatry, 5, 
16.  
McKay, J. R., Rutherford, M. J., Alterman, A. I., Cacciola, J. S., & Kaplan, M. R. (1995). An examination of the 
cocaine relapse process. Drug Alcohol Depend, 38(1), 35-43.  
McMahon, R. C. (2001). Personality, stress, and social support in cocaine relapse prediction. J Subst Abuse 
Treat, 21(2), 77-87.  
McRae-Clark, A. L., Baker, N. L., Maria, M. M., & Brady, K. T. (2013). Effect of oxytocin on craving and stress 
response in marijuana-dependent individuals: a pilot study. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 228(4), 623-
631.  

26 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Meinlschmidt, G., & Heim, C. (2007). Sensitivity to intranasal oxytocin in adult men with early parental separation. 
Biol Psychiatry, 61(9), 1109-1111.  
Miller, W. R., Walters, S. T., & Bennett, M. E. (2001). How effective is alcoholism treatment in the United States? 
J Stud Alcohol, 62(2), 211-220.  
Morales-Rivera, A., Hernandez-Burgos, M. M., Martinez-Rivera, A., Perez-Colon, J., Rivera, R., Montalvo, J., 
Rodriguez-Borrero, E., & Maldonado-Vlaar, C. S. (2014). Anxiolytic effects of oxytocin in cue-induced 
cocaine seeking behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl).  
Moran-Santa Maria, M. M., Hartwell, K. J., Hanlon, C. A., Canterberry, M., Lematty, T., Owens, M., Brady, K. T., 
& George, M. S. (2014). Right anterior insula connectivity is important for cue-induced craving in nicotine-
dependent smokers. Addict Biol.  
Moran-Santa Maria, M. M., McRae-Clark, A., Baker, N. L., Ramakrishnan, V., & Brady, K. T. (2014). Yohimbine 
administration and cue-reactivity in cocaine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl). Moran-
Santa Maria, M. M., McRae-Clark, A. L., Back, S. E., DeSantis, S. M., Baker, N. L., Spratt, E. G., Simpson, 
A. N., & Brady, K. T. (2010). Influence of cocaine dependence and early life stress on pituitary-adrenal 
axis responses to CRH and the Trier social stressor. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(10), 1492-1500.  
Morgan, D., Grant, K. A., Gage, H. D., Mach, R. H., Kaplan, J. R., Prioleau, O., Nader, S. H., Buchheimer, N., 
Ehrenkaufer, R. L., & Nader, M. A. (2002). Social dominance in monkeys: dopamine D2 receptors and 
cocaine self-administration. Nat Neurosci, 5(2), 169-174.  
Morris, J. S., Friston, K. J., Buchel, C., Frith, C. D., Young, A. W., Calder, A. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). A 
neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain, 121 ( 
Pt 1), 47-57.  
Morris, J. S., Ohman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating "unseen" 
fear. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96(4), 1680-1685.  
O'Doherty, J., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., Hornak, J., & Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment 
representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci, 4(1), 95-102.  
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the 
cognitive regulation of emotion. J Cogn Neurosci, 14(8), 1215-1229.  
Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. R., Hughes, B., McRae, K., Cooper, J. C., Weber, J., Gabrieli, J. D., & Gross, J. J. 
(2009). Bottom-up and top-down processes in emotion generation: common and distinct neural 
mechanisms. Psychol Sci, 20(11), 1322-1331.  
Ohira, H., Nomura, M., Ichikawa, N., Isowa, T., Iidaka, T., Sato, A., Fukuyama, S., Nakajima, T., & Yamada, J. 
(2006). Association of neural and physiological responses during voluntary emotion suppression. 
Neuroimage, 29(3), 721-733.  
Petrovic, P., Kalisch, R., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2008). Oxytocin attenuates affective evaluations of 
conditioned faces and amygdala activity. J Neurosci, 28(26), 6607-6615.  
Petry, N. M., & Martin, B. (2002). Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine- and opioid-abusing 
methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol, 70(2), 398-405.  
Petry, N. M., Petrakis, I., Trevisan, L., Wiredu, G., Boutros, N. N., Martin, B., & Kosten, T. R. (2001). Contingency 
management interventions: from research to practice. Am J Psychiatry, 158(5), 694-702.  
Pezawas, L., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Drabant, E. M., Verchinski, B. A., Munoz, K. E., Kolachana, B. S., Egan, M. 
F., Mattay, V. S., Hariri, A. R., & Weinberger, D. R. (2005). 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human 
cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci, 8(6), 
828-834.  
Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis 
of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage, 16(2), 331-348.  
Phillips, M. L., Medford, N., Young, A. W., Williams, L., Williams, S. C., Bullmore, E. T., Gray, J. A., & Brammer, 
M. J. (2001). Time courses of left and right amygdalar responses to fearful facial expressions. Hum Brain 
Mapp, 12(4), 193-202.  
Pohorecky, L. A. (1991). Stress and alcohol interaction: an update of human research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 
15(3), 438-459.  
Poljac, E., Montagne, B., & de Haan, E. H. (2011). Reduced recognition of fear and sadness in post-traumatic 
stress disorder. Cortex, 47(8), 974-980. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.10.002 

27 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Potenza, M. N., Hong, K. I., Lacadie, C. M., Fulbright, R. K., Tuit, K. L., & Sinha, R. (2012). Neural correlates of 
stress-induced and cue-induced drug craving: influences of sex and cocaine dependence. Am J 
Psychiatry, 169(4), 406-414.  
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012). Spurious but systematic 
correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage, 59(3), 2142-
2154.  
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2013). Steps toward optimizing 
motion artifact removal in functional connectivity MRI; a reply to Carp. Neuroimage, 76, 439-441.  
Price, J. L. (2005). Free will versus survival: brain systems that underlie intrinsic constraints on behavior. J Comp 
Neurol, 493(1), 132-139.  
Prisciandaro, J. J., Myrick, H., Henderson, S., McRae-Clark, A. L., Santa Ana, E. J., Saladin, M. E., & Brady, K. 
T. (2013). Impact of DCS-facilitated cue exposure therapy on brain activation to cocaine cues in cocaine 
dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend, 132(1-2), 195-201.  
Qi, J., Yang, J. Y., Song, M., Li, Y., Wang, F., & Wu, C. F. (2008). Inhibition by oxytocin of methamphetamine-
induced hyperactivity related to dopamine turnover in the mesolimbic region in mice. Naunyn 
Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 376(6), 441-448.  
Qi, J., Yang, J. Y., Wang, F., Zhao, Y. N., Song, M., & Wu, C. F. (2009). Effects of oxytocin on methamphetamine-
induced conditioned place preference and the possible role of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the 
medial prefrontal cortex of mice in reinstatement. Neuropharmacology, 56(5), 856-865.  
Quirin, M., Kuhl, J., & Dusing, R. (2011). Oxytocin buffers cortisol responses to stress in individuals with impaired 
emotion regulation abilities. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(6), 898-904.  
Rauch, S. L., Whalen, P. J., Shin, L. M., McInerney, S. C., Macklin, M. L., Lasko, N. B., Orr, S. P., & Pitman, R. 
K. (2000). Exaggerated amygdala response to masked facial stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder: a 
functional MRI study. Biol Psychiatry, 47(9), 769-776.  
Rhodes, J. E., & Jason, L. A. (1990). A social stress model of substance abuse. J Consult Clin Psychol, 58(4), 
395-401.  
Riem, M. M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Pieper, S., Tops, M., Boksem, M. A., Vermeiren, R. R., van 
Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Rombouts, S. A. (2011). Oxytocin modulates amygdala, insula, and inferior frontal 
gyrus responses to infant crying: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry, 70(3), 291-297.  
Riem, M. M., van, I. M. H., Tops, M., Boksem, M. A., Rombouts, S. A., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2012). 
No laughing matter: intranasal oxytocin administration changes functional brain connectivity during 
exposure to infant laughter. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37(5), 1257-1266.  
Rorden, C., & Brett, M. (2000). Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol, 12(4), 191-200.  
Rudoy, C. A., Reyes, A. R., & Van Bockstaele, E. J. (2009). Evidence for beta1-adrenergic receptor involvement 
in amygdalar corticotropin-releasing factor gene expression: implications for cocaine withdrawal. 
Neuropsychopharmacology, 34(5), 1135-1148.  
Sarnyai, Z., Babarczy, E., Krivan, M., Szabo, G., Kovacs, G. L., Barth, T., & Telegdy, G. (1991). Selective 
attenuation of cocaine-induced stereotyped behaviour by oxytocin: putative role of basal forebrain target 
sites. Neuropeptides, 19(1), 51-56.  
Sarnyai, Z., & Kovacs, G. L. (1994). Role of oxytocin in the neuroadaptation to drugs of abuse. 
Psychoneuroendocrinology, 19(1), 85-117.  
Sarnyai, Z., Szabo, G., Kovacs, G. L., & Telegdy, G. (1992). Opposite actions of oxytocin and vasopressin in the 
development of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 43(2), 491-
494.  
Schenk, S., Lacelle, G., Gorman, K., & Amit, Z. (1987). Cocaine self-administration in rats influenced by 
environmental conditions: implications for the etiology of drug abuse. Neurosci Lett, 81(1-2), 227-231.  
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. 
(2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J 
Neurosci, 27(9), 2349-2356.  
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Fischer, M., Dvash, J., Harari, H., Perach-Bloom, N., & Levkovitz, Y. (2009). Intranasal 
administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude (gloating). Biol Psychiatry, 66(9), 864-870.  

28 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Hergueta, T., Baker, R., & 
Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and 
validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry, 59 
Suppl 20, 22-33;quiz 34-57.  
Shi, H., Wang, X., & Yao, S. (2013). Comparison of activation patterns between masking and inattention tasks: 
a coordinate-based meta-analysis of implicit emotional face processing. Front Hum Neurosci, 7, 459.  
Shin, L. M., Dougherty, D. D., Orr, S. P., Pitman, R. K., Lasko, M., Macklin, M. L., Alpert, N. M., Fischman, A. J., 
& Rauch, S. L. (2000). Activation of anterior paralimbic structures during guilt-related script-driven 
imagery. Biol Psychiatry, 48(1), 43-50.  
Simeon, D., Bartz, J., Hamilton, H., Crystal, S., Braun, A., Ketay, S., & Hollander, E. (2011). Oxytocin 
administration attenuates stress reactivity in borderline personality disorder: a pilot study. 
Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(9), 1418-1421.  
Sinha, R., Catapano, D., & O'Malley, S. (1999). Stress-induced craving and stress response in cocaine 
dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 142(4), 343-351.  
Sinha, R., Fox, H., Hong, K. I., Sofuoglu, M., Morgan, P. T., & Bergquist, K. T. (2007). Sex steroid hormones, 
stress response, and drug craving in cocaine-dependent women: implications for relapse susceptibility. 
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 15(5), 445-452.  
Sinha, R., Lacadie, C., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Rounsaville, B. J., Kosten, T. R., & Wexler, B. E. (2005). 
Neural activity associated with stress-induced cocaine craving: a functional magnetic resonance imaging 
study. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 183(2), 171-180.  
Sivukhina, E. V., Dolzhikov, A. A., Morozov Iu, E., Jirikowski, G. F., & Grinevich, V. (2006). Effects of chronic 
alcoholic disease on magnocellular and parvocellular hypothalamic neurons in men. Horm Metab Res, 
38(6), 382-390.  
Skinner HA. The drug abuse screening test. Addictive Behaviors. Addictive Behaviors. 1982;7:363-371. 
Spielberger CD. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press; Palo Alto (CA): 1983. 
Sripada, C. S., Phan, K. L., Labuschagne, I., Welsh, R., Nathan, P. J., & Wood, A. G. (2013). Oxytocin enhances 
resting-state connectivity between amygdala and medial frontal cortex. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol, 
16(2), 255-260.  
Straube, T., Kolassa, I. T., Glauer, M., Mentzel, H. J., & Miltner, W. H. (2004). Effect of task conditions on brain 
responses to threatening faces in social phobics: an event-related functional magnetic resonance 
imaging study. Biol Psychiatry, 56(12), 921-930.  
Straus MA, Hamby SL, Warren WL: The Conflict Tactics Scales Handbook: Revised Conflict Tactics Scale 
(CTS2) and CTS: Parent-Child Version (CTSPC). Los Angeles, CA, USA, Western Psychological 
Services; 2003.Striepens, N., Scheele, D., Kendrick, K. M., Becker, B., Schafer, L., Schwalba, K., Reul, 
J., Maier, W., & Hurlemann, R. (2012). Oxytocin facilitates protective responses to aversive social stimuli 
in males. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109(44), 18144-18149.  
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2013). Results from the 2012 National Survey on 
Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Rockville, MD. 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Drug Abuse Warning Network. (2013). 2011: 
National Estimates of Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits. Rockville, MD. 
Turner, B. H., Mishkin, M., & Knapp, M. (1980). Organization of the amygdalopetal projections from modality-
specific cortical association areas in the monkey. J Comp Neurol, 191(4), 515-543.  
Veer, I. M., Oei, N.Y., van Buchem, M.A., Elzinga, B.M., Rombouts, S.A.,. (2010). Acute Social Stress Increases 
Amygdala Functional Connectivity with Posterior Cingulate Cortex and Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex. Proc. 
Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., 18, 3509.  
Veinante, P., & Freund-Mercier, M. J. (1997). Distribution of oxytocin- and vasopressin-binding sites in the rat 
extended amygdala: a histoautoradiographic study. J Comp Neurol, 383(3), 305-325.  
Volkow, N. D., Baler, R. D., & Goldstein, R. Z. (2011). Addiction: pulling at the neural threads of social behaviors. 
Neuron, 69(4), 599-602.  
Waldrop, A. E., Back, S. E., Brady, K. T., Upadhyaya, H. P., McRae, A. L., & Saladin, M. E. (2007). Daily stressor 
sensitivity, abuse effects, and cocaine use in cocaine dependence. Addict Behav, 32(12), 3015-3025.  

29 
 
6/18/20 Version 22.0 
 
Waldrop, A. E., Price, K. L., Desantis, S. M., Simpson, A. N., Back, S. E., McRae, A. L., Spratt, E. G., Kreek, M. 
J., & Brady, K. T. (2010). Community-dwelling cocaine-dependent men and women respond differently 
to social stressors versus cocaine cues. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(6), 798-806.  
Wexler, B. E., Gottschalk, C. H., Fulbright, R. K., Prohovnik, I., Lacadie, C. M., Rounsaville, B. J., & Gore, J. C. 
(2001). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry, 158(1), 86-95.  
Whalen, P. J., Rauch, S. L., Etcoff, N. L., McInerney, S. C., Lee, M. B., & Jenike, M. A. (1998). Masked 
presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. J 
Neurosci, 18(1), 411-418. Williams, J. R., Insel, T. R., Harbaugh, C. R., & Carter, C. S. (1994). Oxytocin 
administered centrally facilitates formation of a partner preference in female prairie voles (Microtus 
ochrogaster). J Neuroendocrinol, 6(3), 247-250.  
Winstock, A. R., Lea, T., & Copeland, J. (2009). Lithium carbonate in the management of cannabis withdrawal 
in humans: an open-label study. J Psychopharmacol, 23(1), 84-93.  
Witt, D. M., Winslow, J. T., & Insel, T. R. (1992). Enhanced social interactions in rats following chronic, centrally 
infused oxytocin. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 43(3), 855-861.  
Wittfoth-Schardt, D., Grunding, J., Wittfoth, M., Lanfermann, H., Heinrichs, M., Domes, G., Buchheim, A., 
Gundel, H., & Waller, C. (2012). Oxytocin modulates neural reactivity to children's faces as a function of 
social salience. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37(8), 1799-1807.  
Yatzkar, U., Klein, E.,. (2010). Intranasal Oxytocin in patients with post traumatic stress disorder: a single dose, 
pilot double blind cross over study. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 20(S84).  
Zak, P. J., Stanton, A. A., & Ahmadi, S. (2007). Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PLoS One, 2(11), 
e1128.  
Zanos, P., Wright, S. R., Georgiou, P., Yoo, J. H., Ledent, C., Hourani, S. M., Kitchen, I., Winsky-Sommerer, R., 
& Bailey, A. (2014). Chronic methamphetamine treatment induces oxytocin receptor up-regulation in the 
amygdala and hypothalamus via an adenosine A2A receptor-independent mechanism. Pharmacol 
Biochem Behav, 119, 72-79.  
Zhou, Y., Spangler, R., Ho, A., & Kreek, M. J. (2003). Increased CRH mRNA levels in the rat amygdala during 
short-term withdrawal from chronic 'binge' cocaine. Brain Res Mol Brain Res, 114(1), 73-79.