Budesonide for Mycophenolic Acid (MPA)-Induced Diarrhea in Renal Transplant Recipients
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Diarrhea
Sponsor: University of Kansas Medical Center

Budesonide for MPA-induced diarrhea in renal transplant recipients 
 
26Dec2018 
 
NCT# - NCT029911768 

Page 1 of 7 
 
Title: Budesonide for MPA-induced diarrhea in renal transplant recipients 
Principal Investigator: Pooja Budhiraja, MD 
PI Contact: 913-588-3520 
Funding Source: Kidney Institute 
Version Date: 26Dec2018 
 
 
SPECIFIC AIMS 
Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with advanced renal failure. The current caveats in 
the transplant medicine are the inadequate treatment options for side effects associated with 
immunosuppressive drug use. 
         Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is one of the main immunosuppressive medications prescribed after organ 
transplant. More than eighty percent renal transplant recipients in the US are on MPA based regimen. Diarrhea 
is a common side effect of the medication and can be seen in around 12-35% of subjects. Mycophenolic acid-
acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG) is a metabolite of MPA, which causes inflammation and cytokine release and has 
been postulated to play major role in GI side effects. Diarrhea from MPA often leads to reduction and even 
discontinuation of the drug, thereby increasing risk of transplant organ rejection. Moreover, the subjects could 
also have weight loss, dyspepsia, nausea, loss of appetite, poor Quality of Life because of gastrointestinal (GI) 
adverse effects of MPA.  
           Corticosteroids, due to their anti-inflammatory activity, are the drug of choice for noninfectious 
inflammatory colitis. Budesonide acts locally in the intestine and is unique in having high first pass hepatic 
metabolism. It has minimal absorption into the systemic circulation thereby minimizing the systemic effects 
associated with other oral steroids. Our overall hypothesis is that oral budesonide can improve MPA associated 
diarrhea. We also plan to study the effect of treatment with Entocort on the gut microbiome in subjects with 
mycophenolic acid induced diarrhea. The long term goal of this project is to identify an effective treatment for 
diarrhea associated with MPA, increase MPA tolerability and improve quality of life and graft outcomes. The goal 
of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of administering budesonide and its clinical efficacy in these 
subjects. Positive results in this study will be a key to moving forward to a long-term, large scale, randomized 
controlled study to definitively test whether budesonide improves MPA associated diarrhea and improves patient 
quality of life and renal graft outcomes. Furthermore, the optimum dose and duration and characteristics 
associated with response will need to be determined. 
             We propose prospective trial where renal transplant subjects with MPA associated diarrhea will receive 
budesonide (Entocort) for 8 weeks and will be followed for additional 8 weeks.  
 
  
 
The specific aims of the pilot study are: 
Aim 1. To determine the effect of oral budesonide on MPA associated diarrhea in renal transplant 
recipients. We hypothesize that subjects who receive budesonide will have improvement in diarrhea.  
 
Aim 2. To compare the change in GI Quality of life in subjects with diarrhea from MPA with 
administration of budesonide. We hypothesize that subjects who receive budesonide will have 
improvement in GI quality of life from baseline. 
 
Aim 3. To compare the gut microbiome changes before and after treatment with budesonide. We 
hypothesize that changes in gut microbiome will corelate with improvement in diarrhea in response to 
budesonide. 
 
RESEARCH STRATEGY 
Significance. 
Kidney transplant for end stage renal disease offers increased longevity and better quantity of life. Adverse 
effects linked to immunosuppressant regimens are a major cause of dose reductions or treatment cessations, 
which can have a detrimental effect on graft survival [1, 2]. 
            Mycophenolic acid (MPA), also called mycophenolate, is one of the most commonly prescribed 
immunosuppressant drugs and MPA-based regimens are associated with most successful outcomes in renal 

Page 2 of 7 
 
transplant [3, 4]. Furthermore, MPA is also frequently used in the treatment of several auto immune disorders. 
MPA is a selective inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), a key enzyme for the de novo 
production of purines in lymphocytes [5]. It is available in two formulations as Cellcept (morpholinoethyl ester of 
mycophenolic acid) and Myfortic (mycophenolate sodium). The drugs are rapidly hydrolyzed after absorption to 
mycophenolic acid, its active metabolite. MPA is metabolized to inactive 7-O-mycophenolic acid glucuronide 
(MPAG) and mycophenolic acid acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG) [6]. MPAG is thought to be pharmacologically 
inactive, but acyl glucuronides are toxic molecules and display pro-inflammatory effects.  
          Diarrhea is a well-recognized GI side effect associated with MPA use and accounts for increased 
morbidity and mortality [7, 8]. When severe, it could also result in volume depletion and renal graft dysfunction. 
Diarrhea associated with MPA often leads to dose reduction or treatment interruption and ultimately to an 
increased rate of acute rejection [1, 2] and is one of the most frequent adverse events leading to non-compliance. 
Its pathology is reasonably well studied but the treatment is currently still not available. Histological findings 
noted on colon biopsy include acute colitis-like findings, inflammatory bowel disease-like characteristics, graft-
versus-host disease-like features and sometimes the biopsy may be non-revealing depending on the obtained 
sample [9]. 
Intestinal exposure to AcMPAG has been considered to be responsible for GI adverse events. AcMPAG is 
excreted in the urine and feces [6]. It is also produced in the GI tract from MPA via hepatic and intestinal 
glucuronidases [10]. AcMPAG is highly reactive and has been shown to cause cytokine release. On exposure to 
AcMPAG, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) release, as well as gene expression 
of these cytokines was significantly increased in leukocytes [11]. The plasma levels of AcMPAG have been found 
to correlate with IL-6 levels in renal transplant patients[10]. TNF-α produced as a result of exposure of mucosal 
cells to AcMPAG also plays a role in GI mucosal inflammation. Case reports of use of TNF-α blocker, infliximab 
leading to improvement of severe diarrhea from mycophenolate in renal transplant subjects further suggests its 
role in pathogenesis [12, 13]. Furthermore, AcMPAG is also a metabolite of NSAIDS which have a similar GI 
toxicity profile; this also supports the role of AcMPAG in causing GI toxicity. 
       The other possible mechanism is inhibition of IMPDH pathway by MPA in GI epithelial cells which can inhibit 
its replication and repair. However, GI epithelial cells may not be wholly dependent on de novo purine synthesis, 
as they may be permeable to purines that are released into the intestine during digestion [14],thus bypassing 
the IMPDH dependent pathway. Therefore, it is now thought that the major cause of GI toxicity is the production 
of AcMPAG. 
         MPA associated adverse effects can also extend along the GI tract and subjects may also report dyspepsia, 
nausea or abdominal discomfort [15]. These side effects can vary in severity and are associated with decrease 
in Quality of life. 
          Budesonide, a corticosteroid, decreases levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1 and TNF-α 
through inhibition of protein synthesis and transcription [16].Systemic corticosteroids are associated with 
numerous cosmetic and serious adverse events including cushingoid features, infection, hypertension, 
osteoporosis, and diabetes mellitus. Budesonide has extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism by cytochrome P-
450 enzymes. Due to limited systemic availability, many of the adverse events associated with systemic 
corticosteroids are diminished. Most studies report mild adverse events that are transient in nature; more 
common side effects include headache, nausea, and dizziness[17]. In a study of budesonide for maintenance 
therapy for patients with Crohn’s colitis, 89% of patients rated the tolerability of the drug as “very good” or “good” 
after 6 weeks of treatment [18]. Budesonide has been effectively used in collagenous colitis, microscopic colitis 
and graft vs host disease with significant improvement in symptoms and is currently one of the drugs of choice 
for these conditions. For the treatment of above conditions Entocort, a gastric resistant formulation of budesonide 
is commonly used. Entocort capsules contain pellets with slow release properties; this preparation allows 
the drug to be delivered mainly to the ileum and ascending colon [19]. The properties of this formulation 
and extensive first pass liver metabolism of budesonide, offer improved therapy by reducing the risk of steroid 
associated side effects.  
 
     Gut microbiome, there has been emerging evidence that gut dysbiosis is associated with post transplant 
diarrhea in subjects on mycophenolic acid.  In recent study by post transplant subjects on mycophenolate there 
was  significant difference in the gut bacteria between the fecal specimens from the Diarrhea Group and the 
fecal specimens from the No Diarrhea Group. We want to study if there is change in gut microbiome after 

Page 3 of 7 
 
treatment with budesonide and if it correlates with improvement in diarrhea. We will obtain stool specimens at 
baseline, week 8 when they finish treatment with budesonide, and at 16 weeks  
 
Innovation.  
This proposal is innovative in the following ways: To date, a there are no current treatments available except 
dose reduction or discontinuation of MPA. Using budesonide is an innovative strategy that has biological 
plausibility and has not been tested. 
 
Approach 
The overall goals of this pilot study are to demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide in MPA 
associated diarrhea and improvement in GI quality of life with its use in renal transplant subjects. The subjects 
will receive oral budesonide 6mg (the dose commonly used for inflammatory colitis) for 8 weeks and will be 
further followed for additional 8 weeks.  
Aim 1. To determine the effect of oral budesonide on MPA associated diarrhea in renal transplant 
recipients. We hypothesize that subjects who receive budesonide will have improvement in diarrhea.  
 
Aim 2. To compare the change in GI Quality of life in subjects with diarrhea from MPA with 
administration of budesonide. We hypothesize that subjects who receive budesonide will have improvement 
in GI quality of life from baseline..  
 
Aim 3. To compare the gut microbiome changes before and after treatment with budesonide. We 
hypothesize that changes in gut microbiome will corelate with improvement in diarrhea in response to 
budesonide. 
 
 
Overall study design: Twenty subjects will be enrolled in the study. This is in addition to 9 subjects who were 
enrolled in the previous version of the protocol. The subjects will be recruited from the kidney transplant clinic at 
KUMC. The transplant center at KU performs around 130 kidney transplants each year and the subjects are 
closely followed and we anticipate no problems in recruiting enough subjects for this study in timely fashion. 
Subjects will be enrolled only if they meet all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria.  
 
 
 
Inclusion criteria:  
1. Male or female >18 years of age  
2. Kidney only transplant recipients > 1 month post-transplant  
3.   No h/o chronic diarrhea pre transplant  
4. >3 watery/soft stools on at least 4 days in the week w/o anti-diarrheal for at least 2 weeks or using anti 
diarrheals for at least 4 days in the week > 2 weeks 
5. Subjects on at least 180mg twice a day of mycophenolate-sodium or 250 mg twice a day of cellcept 6. Recent 
colonoscopy to rule out other causes of diarrhea. 
Exclusion criteria:  
1. Any known colonic diseases (i.e. Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, ischemic colitis, Celiac 
disease), partial colonic resection, small bowel resection, diarrhea caused by cholecystectomy, 
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, fecal incontinence, Bacterial overgrowth, infectious diarrhea (c difficle, 
cryptospora, giardia, isospora, Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Cytomegalovirus colitis. 
2. Subjects with recent acute rejection treated with high dose steroids will be excluded.  
3. Subjects taking Boswellia serrata extract, OTC herbs, cholestyramine, nonsteroidal salicylates 
(other than daily ASA).  
4. Subjects with active malignancy, liver cirrhosis, active peptic ulcer disease, known intolerance or 
resistance to budesonide, mental retardation and inability to consent will be excluded. 

Page 4 of 7 
 
5. Pregnant or nursing females, where pregnancy is confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test. 
Study procedures will occur according to this table. 
 
Screening 
Baseline 
Week 4 
Week 8 
Week 12 
Week 16 
Medical 
History, 
demographics, 
medications 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Vital 
signs 
(BP, HR) and 
weight 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
GIQLI 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
One 
week 
symptom diary 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
Phone 
interview 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Adverse event 
assessment 
a 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Dosing 
 
Begins after 
completion of 
baseline 
1week 
symptom 
diary 
X 
X (ends at 
week 8) 
 
 
Stool 
collection 
for 
gut 
microbiome 
analysis 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
GI symptoms assessment questionnaire 
Diarrhea, defined as the occurrence of liquid stools for at least 2 weeks, with >3 stools/ day and >1 watery stool 
per day in the week. Complete remission (CR) is defined as a mean of <3 stools/day and a mean of <1 watery 
stool per day without use of anti-diarrheal drugs. Patient will be asked to keep a one week symptom diary.  
        Symptom burden will be assessed with a 1-week symptom diary registering presence of diarrhea, number 
of stools per day, number of watery stools per day, urgency (0 = no urgency, 1 = need to defecate within 30 
minutes, 2 = immediate need to empty the bowel, 3 = fecal incontinence), abdominal pain (0 = no pain, 1 = mild, 
2 = moderate, 3 = severe pain), name and dose of anti-diarrheal used per day. Mean number of stools and 
watery stools per day will be calculated by adding up the number of stools registered during 1 week divided by 
7.   
            
         The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is a 36-item questionnaire to assess the impact of GI 
disease on daily life. The GIQLI has 5 subscales (GI symptoms, emotional status, physical functions, social 
functions, and stress of medical treatment), producing a total score of the 36 items. Lower scores represent more 
dysfunction. It has been validated in renal graft recipients [20, 21]. 
 
 
We will obtain stool specimens at baseline, week 8 when they finish treatment with budesonide and at 16 weeks. 
DNA will be isolated from the fecal specimens and the high-quality DNA suitable for 16S rRNA 
Microbiome profiling will be used to identify the microbiome. Subjects will be provided with kits to take home to 
collect the sample.  
 
Statistical Methods:   

Page 5 of 7 
 
Aim 1. To determine the effect of oral budesonide on diarrhea due to MPA in renal transplant recipients.  
Our Primary outcome for this study is clinical remission (CR) by week 8. We will calculate the proportion of 
patients who are in CR at week 8.. Time to remission, relapse during treatment-free follow-up, number of watery 
and solid stools per week (measured at baseline, weeks 8, and 16 weeks),  
 
Aim 2. To compare the change in GI Quality of life in subjects with diarrhea from MPA with administration 
of budesonide. Secondary efficacy outcome for the study is improvement in GIQLI score after administration 
of budesonide. GIQLI will be measured at baseline, weeks 8, and 16 weeks. To utilize all available data, we will 
use repeated measures mixed model analyses with time (measured in weeks) as the within subject factor. Our 
main mixed model analysis will include GI QLI score as the dependent variable and time. We will also conduct 
exploratory analysis using the other variables (as listed below) to identify any predictors of response. 
 
 
Aim 3. To compare the gut microbiome changes before and after treatment with budesonide. We obtain 
stool sample at baseline, weeks 8 and weeks 16. We will compare if the changes in gut microbiome corelate 
with improvement in diarrhea in response to budesonide. 
 
Other variables. We plan to gather the following additional information from time of consent until the week 16 
visit: Patient demographics; medical history; use and amount of immunosuppressive medications; weight; n; 
other GI symptoms as noted by GSRS questionnaire; adverse events as outlined in safety evaluation; episode 
of cellular or antibody mediated graft rejection; graft function as measured using serum creatinine. General 
laboratory tests including complete blood count and  basic metabolic panel, s that are routinely done for renal 
transplant recipients will be recorded.  
Proportions will be compared by the χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Quantitative variables will be compared with the 
non-parametric Mann–Whitney test or Student's t-test. A P-value below 0.05 will be considered to be 
statistically significant.  
 
Sample size justification: Our sample size was selected based on logical/feasibility constraints-not just of the 
funding mechanism, but also of the early phase of discovery. The goal at this phase is to study feasibility and 
efficacy of budesonide in MPA associated diarrhea. Since no preliminary information is available for our study, 
no formal sample size calculations are provided. Regardless, valuable information gained from this study—
including feasibility of administering this medication over such a period of time—will provide critical information 
in consideration for subsequent research. Within the limitations of a pilot study, we have selected to not do 
randomization as subjects who have diarrhea from the medication would want to be treated. 
 
Data management: Study data will be collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture 
(REDCap), a web-based, electronic data capture tools hosted on a secure, HIPPA compliant server at 
KUMC[22]. Data will be entered by the research coordinators and validated with real-time entry validation and 
offline validation by the investigators. The database will be maintained in a secure institutional server that will 
have regular back-up, with only the PI, co-PI and coordinator having access.     
 
Timeline: We anticipate 16 weeks follow up for each patient. We will recruit 20 patients around 18 months. We 
anticipate about 2 months for statistical analysis. We anticipate 3-4 months for manuscript writing and future 
grant applications. 
 
Safety Evaluation. Patient will have face to face interview and vitals (BP, HR, weight) at enrollment (baseline), 
week 8 and 16. Phone interview will be done at 4and 12 weeks to monitor compliance, changes in medication 
and occurrence for adverse events  
Potential adverse effects of steroids including insomnia, rash, palpitations, headache, hyperglycemia and 
dizziness will also be noted. Any symptoms noted at enrollment will be considered medical history. Any worsenin  
in severity of symptoms after enrollment will be considered adverse events.  
Withdrawn 
. If subjects withdraw consent and discontinue treatment, they will be requested to complete the week 8 and 16 
visit procedures. 

Page 6 of 7 
 
 Adverse events will be collected from the time of signing the informed consent until the week 16 visit.  
After study completion/withdrawal, patients could continue therapy with commercially available budesonide at 
the discretion of the clinician/ /patient. 
 
 
 
 
 
Potential limitations. Due to budget limitations, we will not be able to do a large placebo controlled trial. 
However, if results are encouraging, we will use preliminary data from the proposed study for the procurement 
of future funding to support such investigations. The extent of symptoms reporting by patients will depend on 
patient’s subjective assessment. Also, there is no standardized approach to define and describe the severity of 
diarrhea in these patients [23, 24]. The lack of a validated, reproducible and uniform approach to the clinical 
evaluation of GI symptoms makes it difficult to compare GI effects. Despite these limitations, questionnaires may 
be a useful way of various regimens to assess fluctuating (especially symptom diary) and variable symptoms in 
individual patients. They can also give a good indication of an individual patient's subjective perception of the 
severity of their symptoms and the relative impact of the symptoms on their overall quality of life. We will not be 
performing colonoscopy as part of the protocol. Subjects > 50 are screened with colonoscopy as part of 
transplant care. If clinical symptoms warrant colonoscopy it will be done as a part of clinical care. 
 
Anticipated Impact and future funding 
Achieving the aims of the application will result in the advancement of scientific knowledge regarding the 
treatment options available for MPA associated diarrhea in renal transplant recipients. Such knowledge will 
facilitate adequate evaluation and appropriate treatment of diarrhea rather than MPA dose reduction. It may have 
the potential of improving quality of life and lowering the healthcare costs by improving patient morbidity and 
graft survival. MPA is also used in other conditions including other organ transplants and multiple autoimmune 
disorders.  Clearly, in view of the significant use of MPA and prevalence of GI adverse effects, the impact of the 
proposed project will not be limited to the renal transplant population, but can be generalized to the other 
conditions where its use is limited by diarrhea.  
           The PI is a junior investigator who has a strong interest in clinical and translational research in the field of 
nephrology especially Transplant. The results of this study will provide the applicant with preliminary data to 
facilitate a proposal for a NIH research grant as well as Career Development Grant from the American Society 
of Nephrology and American Society of Transplantation. The PI plans to use the preliminary results generated 
from this study for prospective large randomized control trial with long term follow up. This will help to identify 
the subjects who will benefit, the optimal duration of treatment as well as how it can translate to better patient 
and long term graft outcomes.   
 
Environment 
The Center for Transplantation at The University of Kansas Hospital is the largest and most successful transplant 
program in the state. Patients from across the country turn to our nationally recognized program because of our 
reputation, expertise, reduced wait times and exceptionally high standards for comprehensive care. Our patient 
survival rates are higher than regional and national averages, and our organ waiting list times are significantly 
shorter. At the Center for Transplantation, specialists offer the most advanced treatment options. This includes 
highly specialized procedures, such as desensitization and individualized immunosuppressive therapies, in 
addition to the resources of the region’s premier academic medical center. We also provide ABO-incompatible 
transplantation and the only paired kidney exchange program in the Kansas City area. The transplant physicians 
and surgeons have the experience and expertise to provide patients with the most advanced transplant care 
possible. Patients from across the country turn to our nationally recognized Center for Transplantation, which 
provides advanced, comprehensive care in one location. 
This research project will also be supported by the Kidney Institute at the University of Kansas Medical Center. 
The Kidney Institute is a world-class, internationally recognized research center comprised of 44 doctoral level 
faculty investigators and provides clinician-scientists and basic-scientists opportunities to closely interact on joint 
research projects and clinical trials.  
References 
1. 
Pelletier, R.P., et al., The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal 
transplantation. Clin Transplant, 2003. 17(3): p. 200-5. 

Page 7 of 7 
 
2. 
Knoll, G.A., et al., Mycophenolate mofetil dose reduction and the risk of acute rejection after renal 
transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2003. 14(9): p. 2381-6. 
3. 
Meier-Kriesche, H.U., et al., Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus is associated with worse renal allograft 
survival compared to mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus. Am J Transplant, 2005. 5(9): p. 2273-80. 
4. 
Srinivas, T.R., et al., The impact of mycophenolate mofetil on long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation. 
Transplantation, 2005. 80(2 Suppl): p. S211-20. 
5. 
Allison, A.C. and E.M. Eugui, The design and development of an immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolate 
mofetil. Springer Semin Immunopathol, 1993. 14(4): p. 353-80. 
6. 
Shipkova, M., et al., Identification of glucoside and carboxyl-linked glucuronide conjugates of mycophenolic acid 
in plasma of transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Br J Pharmacol, 1999. 126(5): p. 1075-82. 
7. 
Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention 
of acute rejection. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Lancet, 1995. 345(8961): p. 1321-
5. 
8. 
Kamar, N., et al., Questionnaire-based evaluation of gastrointestinal disorders in de novo renal-transplant 
patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Nephrol Dial 
Transplant, 2005. 20(10): p. 2231-6. 
9. 
Calmet, F.H., et al., Endoscopic and histological features of mycophenolate mofetil colitis in patients after solid 
organ transplantation. Ann Gastroenterol, 2015. 28(3): p. 366-373. 
10. 
Shipkova, M., et al., Acyl glucuronide drug metabolites: toxicological and analytical implications. Ther Drug 
Monit, 2003. 25(1): p. 1-16. 
11. 
Wieland, E., et al., Induction of cytokine release by the acyl glucuronide of mycophenolic acid: a link to side 
effects? Clin Biochem, 2000. 33(2): p. 107-13. 
12. 
Bouhbouh, S. and M.B. Rookmaaker, Rapid resolution of persistent mycophenolate mofetil-induced diarrhoea 
with a single dose of infliximab. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010. 25(10): p. 3437-8. 
13. 
Seifert, H., et al., Not your usual diarrhoea: severe colonic toxicity of mycophenolate due to intestinal CMV and 
EBV infection. BMJ Case Rep, 2013. 2013. 
14. 
Wilson, D.W. and H.C. Wilson, Studies in vitro of the digestion and absorption of purine ribonucleotides by the 
intestine. J Biol Chem, 1962. 237: p. 1643-7. 
15. 
Hardinger, K.L., et al., Long-term outcome of gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant patients treated 
with mycophenolate mofetil. Transpl Int, 2004. 17(10): p. 609-16. 
16. 
Barnes, P.J., Molecular mechanisms and cellular effects of glucocorticosteroids. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 
2005. 25(3): p. 451-68. 
17. 
Tangri, V. and N. Chande, Use of budesonide in the treatment of microscopic colitis. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2010. 
16(3): p. 236-8. 
18. 
Bonderup, O.K., et al., Budesonide treatment of collagenous colitis: a randomised, double blind, placebo 
controlled trial with morphometric analysis. Gut, 2003. 52(2): p. 248-51. 
19. 
Edsbacker, S. and T. Andersson, Pharmacokinetics of budesonide (Entocort EC) capsules for Crohn's disease. Clin 
Pharmacokinet, 2004. 43(12): p. 803-21. 
20. 
Kleinman, L., et al., Using GI-specific patient outcome measures in renal transplant patients: validation of the 
GSRS and GIQLI. Qual Life Res, 2006. 15(7): p. 1223-32. 
21. 
Reinke, P., et al., Reduction of gastrointestinal complications in renal graft recipients after conversion from 
mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Transplant Proc, 2011. 43(5): p. 1641-6. 
22. 
Harris, P.A., et al., Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow 
process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform, 2009. 42(2): p. 377-81. 
23. 
Pescovitz, M.D. and M.T. Navarro, Immunosuppressive therapy and post-transplantation diarrhea. Clin 
Transplant, 2001. 15 Suppl 4: p. 23-8. 
24. 
Davies, N.M., et al., Gastrointestinal side effects of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients: a reappraisal. 
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2007. 22(9): p. 2440-8. 
25.      Lee, J.R et al., Gut microbiota dysbiosis and diarrhea in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun 19.