A 12-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Relamorelin in Patients With Diabetic Gastroparesis
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Gastroparesis, Diabetes Mellitus
Sponsor: Allergan

NCT03426345 
 
Study ID: RLM‐MD‐02 
 
 
Title:  A 12‐week, Randomized, Double‐blind, Placebo‐controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety 
and Efficacy of Relamorelin in Patients with Diabetic Gastroparesis 
 
 
Protocol Amendment 3 Date: 05Mar2019 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
1
Title Page
Protocol Title: A 12-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to 
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Relamorelin in Patients with Diabetic Gastroparesis
Brief Protocol Title: Diabetic Gastroparesis Study 2
Protocol Number: RLM-MD-02
Amendment Number: 3
Product: Relamorelin
Sponsor Name and Legal Registered Address:
Allergan Sales, LLC, 5 Giralda Farms, Madison, New Jersey 07940, United States
Allergan Ltd., Marlow International, Parkway, Marlow SL7 1YL, United Kingdom
Regulatory Agency Identifying Number(s):
IND: 
EudraCT: 2017-002177-20
Emergency Telephone Number: Refer to study contacts list
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Email/Fax Number:
Email: 
Fax Number: 
Allergan Medical Safety Physician: Refer to study contacts list
Allergan Signatory:
Vice President, Clinical Development-GI

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
2
Protocol Amendment 3 Summary of Changes
DOCUMENT HISTORY
Document
Date
Amendment 2
25 Mar 2018
Amendment 1
17 Jan 2018
Original Protocol
03 Oct 2017
Amendment 3 (05 Mar 2019)
Overall Rationale for Amendment 3:
This summary includes changes made to Protocol RLM-MD-02 from Protocol Amendment 2 
(Dated 25 Mar 2018; details provided in Section 12.18). The purpose of Protocol Amendment 3 
is to communicate changes made in response to recommendation from health authorities. These
changes will not impact safety assessment of relamorelin or alter the risk-benefit ratio for study 
participants.
The following is a summary of content-oriented changes that were made. Strikethrough text 
denotes text removed and bolded text denotes added text. Additional administrative edits were 
also made, but not specifically noted (eg, corrected spelling, punctuation, grammar, abbreviation, 
and style errors) including global edits required for consistency.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
3
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Section 1 Synopsis and 
Section 4 Objectives and 
Endpoints
Modified definition of primary endpoints, added more details, and replaced 
definition for Responder with definition for Baseline.
For a more appropriate, clearly defined endpoint.
Section 1 Synopsis, Section 
5.1 Overall Design, Section 
12.9/Appendix 9 Study 
Tabular Design
Increased duration of study from 16 weeks to 18 weeks and increased 
Screening Period from 2 weeks to up to 4 weeks.
To align with change in the length of the 
Screening Period as described below.
Section 1 Synopsis and 
Section 5.1 Overall Design
Removed references to a BMI requirement
To align with the removal of the BMI inclusion 
criteria
Section 1 Synopsis Figure 1 
Section 2 SOA, and 
Section 5.1 Overall Design 
Figure 2
Start of Screening Period revised form Day -28 to Day -42.
To allow more time for completion of endoscopy 
or upper GI series with contrast and for washout 
of prohibited medications.
Section 1 Synopsis and 
Section 5.1 Overall Design
Added requirement for study population at screening to have had a history of 
at least 2 vomiting episodes and to have had at least 1 vomiting episode 
during the Run-in Period.
To clarify that history of vomiting episodes and 
GEBT should be noted in the Run-in Period and 
not the Screening Period
Synopsis, Section 5.2 
Participant and Study 
Completion, Section 12.9/ 
Appendix 9 Study Tabular 
Summary
Increased the number of sites from approximately 200 to approximately 350.  
Increased the number of screened participants from approximately 2000 to 
approximately 2500.
To allow for additional sites.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
4
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Section 2 SOA
Changed number of days for Screening Period from up to 14 days to up to 28 
days.
Added footnote “a” to specify when results from assessments at Visit 1 
should be obtained; adjusted numbering of all footnotes that followed.
Added ECG assessment at Visit 4.
Modified footnote referencing urine drug screen (ie, footnote “j”), to specify 
that opioids are not drugs for which the investigator may choose not to 
consider exclusionary.
Added footnote “k” to fasting blood glucose:  Serum for all visits except for 
Visits 4 and 6 (plasma).
To align with the change in the start of in the
Screening Period from Day -28 to Day -42.
To provide details regarding additional 
requirements with the increase length of the 
Screening Period
To meet recommendations made by MHRA and 
ANSM in its review of the protocol.
To align with changes made to Exclusion Criteria 
#12
For clarification.
Section 2 SOA, 
Section 9.4.6 Self-
monitoring of Blood 
Glucose, 
Section 12.2 Table 12-1 
Protocol-Required Safety 
Laboratory Assessments
Removed assessment of glycated albumin from SOA and all related text in 
Section 9.4.6 and Section 12.2 Table 12-1
Preliminary results do not show that assessment of 
glycated albumin is useful for the adjustment of 
glycemic control.
Section 4.1 Clinical 
Hypotheses
Reformat section heading as level 2 per CPT.  Updated and clarified both 
hypotheses.
To align with change in primary endpoint

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
5
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Section 6.1 Inclusion 
Criteria
Amended Inclusion Criterion #6 to allow for a GI series with contrast as an 
assessment tool for documenting absence of an obstructing lesion and adjust 
timing of assessments from some time before screening (Visit 1) to 
sometime before the Run-in Period (Visit 2).
Removed BMI criterion #9.
Inclusion Criteria #10:  added a reference to Appendix 3
To clarify what an acceptable alternative to upper 
endoscopy is for exclusion of an obstructing 
lesion (upper GI series with contrast) and to allow 
the procedure to be done during the Screening 
Period if not done previously.
BMI not relevant for treatment of gastroparesis.
To clearly comply with country-specific 
guidelines in CPT.
Section 6.2 Exclusion 
Criteria
Amended Exclusion Criterion #3 to specify that participants with active 
eating disorders at the time of screening are to be excluded, as opposed to 
those with a history of eating disorders.
Exclusion Criterion #11:  Added 5HT agonists as exclusionary drug.
Amended Exclusion Criteria #12 to allow a participant with a positive urine
drug screen at Screening to continue in the study while confirmatory testing 
is done on an aliquot of the original sample; specified that opioids are not 
drugs for which the investigator may choose not to consider exclusionary.
Added exclusion criteria for hypersensitivity to the study treatments and 
their excipients (Exclusion Criterion #25) and for specific corrected ECG 
results (Exclusion Criterion #26).
For clarification
Added because 5HT agonists are still approved in 
some countries
To verify that positive urine drug screen results 
are not false-positive before excluding a 
participant from continuing in screening and 
clarify that use of opioids is exclusionary.
To meet recommendation made by MHRA in its 
review of the protocols
Section 6.4 Screen Failures
Added option for the sponsor to permit a participant with a positive urine 
drug screen at Screening to continue in the Screening Period while 
confirmatory urine drug screen testing by a more specific method is carried 
on an aliquot of the original sample.
To verify that positive urine drug screen results 
are not false-positive before excluding a 
participant from continuing in screening, and to 
clarify that the use of barbiturates, 
benzodiazepines and amphetamines are allowable 
if prescribed for continuous use for a clinically 
appropriate indication

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
6
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Section 7.1 Treatments 
Administered
Clarified that the first dose of study treatment is to be administered within 
approximately 30 minutes before the morning meal and the second daily 
dose is to be administered approximately 30 before the evening meal.
Deleted option for investigator to contact sponsor if the participant could not 
inject study treatment into abdomen.
To clarify the timing of dosing and to be 
consistent with the wording in the ICF. Option to 
contact the sponsor removed as the sponsor does 
not currently have any information to support 
injection into alternative sites.
Section 7.1.1 Run-in 
Medications and 
Administrations
Replaced “breakfast” and “dinner” with “morning” and “evening” meals, 
respectively.
Clarified that placebo should be administered approximately 30 minutes 
before each meal.
To be consistent with dosing of study treatment.
Section 7.4 Blinding
Unblinding procedures modified; requirement of investigator to notify 
sponsor prior to unblinding modified to encouraging the investigator to 
notify the sponsor prior to unblinding, but requiring notification within 
24 hours after breaking the blind.
To meet recommendation made by MHRA in its 
review of the protocols, but applicable globally
Section 7.7.1 Prohibited 
Treatments
SLGT-1 added as an exception to prohibited drugs along with SLGT-2; 
specified that SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 inhibitors are prohibited for 3 days prior 
to the GEBT performed at the start of the Run-in Period for all participants 
and for a subset of participants at Visit 7 or Early Termination Visit at a 
subset of sites.
Table 7-2:  Corresponding changes as per above; rearranged rows by 
washout period; specified 3 consecutive weeks or more to clarify that once 
weekly requirements of anti-emetics for this amount of time is prohibitory; 
added row for 5HT4 agonists; added tramadol as an example of an opioid;
amended washout period for opioids from “10 days prior to the start of the 
Run-in Period” to Not applicable since the use of opioids is not allowed and 
referenced exclusion criteria #12 and #13 accordingly.
To clarify that the SGLT-1 or SGLT-2 inhibitors 
are prohibited only 3 days prior to GEBT as they 
may affect interpretation of the test, but are 
otherwise allowed.
In response to FDA request for more definitive 
direction to investigators regarding contacting the 
sponsor to discuss the advisability of continued 
participation in the study by a patient needing 
frequent anti-emetic treatment; Tramadol added as 
an example; 5H4T agonists added since they are 
still approved in some countries; aligned with 
exclusion criteria.
Section 7.7.3 Rescue 
Medicine
Clarifications made to text; Removed antihistamines as an example of an 
anti-emetic drug
Requested by FDA as described above; there is no 
clear evidence that antihistamines have anti-
emetic benefits in the context of vomiting and 
nausea associated with DG

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
7
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Section 8 
Discontinuation/Withdrawal 
Criteria;
Section 12.8 Appendix 8: 
Standard Discontinuation 
Criteria
Removed: “non-compliance with study treatment”
Non-compliance minimum criterion is not defined 
for this protocol
Section 8.1.1 Temporary 
Discontinuation
Added requirement for the investigator to contact the sponsor under specific 
conditions.
In response to FDA request to include 
standardized criteria for restarting study 
treatment, including proposed dose adjustments
Section 9.1 Efficacy 
Assessments
Defined zero and 10 scores of the DG assessments.
To align with the change in the primary endpoint 
and updates made to the SAP in response to FDA 
request
Section 9.1.1.1 Primary 
Efficacy Assessments
Specified time period (ie, from baseline to Week 12) for which the change in 
DGSSS will be assessed; deleted definition and details of numerical rating 
scale scores; deleted definition for a DGSSS Responder
To align with the change in the primary endpoint 
and updates made to the SAP in response to FDA 
request
Section 9.2.1 Time Period 
and Frequency for 
Collecting AE and SAE 
Information
Specified that medical occurrences that begin before the start of study 
treatment but after obtaining IC will be recorded in the AE section of the 
eCRF instead of the Medical History/Current Medical Conditions section of 
the eCRF as previously stated.
To reflect current practices.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
8
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Section 9.2.4 Regulatory 
Reporting Requirements for 
SAEs
Details added to second bullet for clarity.
To clearly comply with country-specific 
guidelines in CPT
Section 9.2.7.1 Hy’s Law
Editorial changes for clarity.
For clarification and to align with changes made 
in Appendix 4
Section 9.2.7.2 Inadequate 
Control of Diabetes:  
Hyperglycemia and 
Hypoglycemia
Added the phrase “Inadequate Control of Diabetes” to section title.
For consistency with MSMP language
Section 9.2.8 Medication 
Error
Specified 10 µg BID or 20 µg/day as the maximum recommended dose.
Deleted statement referencing a dose of greater than 150 µg BID to be 
considered an overdose. 
For clarity and accuracy.
Section 10.1 Sample Size 
Determination
Revised and clarified sample size determination
To align with updated SAP: sample size 
calculations based on the CFB to Week 12
Section 10.2 Populations for 
Analyses
Table 10-1, Analysis Populations – specified “double-blind” treatment for 
Safety Population
To align with SAP.
Section 10.3.1 Key 
Statistical Methodology, 
Table 10-2 Statistical 
Methodology
Added row to describe CFB.
For clarification and to align with updated 
endpoints
Section 10.3.2 Efficacy 
Analysis, Table 10-3 
Primary and Secondary 
Endpoints
Updated primary endpoint and its description.
To align with change in primary endpoint
Section 10.3.2.2 Multiple 
Comparisons Procedure
Clarifications made to Family 1/Hypothesis H1; reference made to SAP for 
other efficacy analyses.
To align with change in primary endpoint
Section 10.3.2.3 Missing 
Data
Updated how missing data will be handled.
To align with updated SAP
Section 10.3.4 Other 
Analyses
Replaced language about specific analyses and how they will be described in 
SAP with general language that analyses for additional endpoints will be 
specified in the SAP
Correction and clarification
Section 10.3.5 Interim 
Analyses
Added a requirement for a DSMB to review interim safety data at defined 
intervals throughout the study.
As requested by health authorities including FDA 
and National Agency for the Safety of Medicine 
and Health Products (ANSM)

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
9
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Appendix 1 Abbreviations
Abbreviations added and deleted throughout as appropriate for those 
abbreviations being used or not used throughout this document
Clarity and corrections
Section 12.2 Appendix 2 
Clinical Laboratory Tests, 
Table 12-1 Protocol-
Required Safety Laboratory 
Assessments
Added footnote for fasting blood glucose specifying that serum will be 
assessed for all visits except Visits 4 and 6, when plasma will be assessed.
For clarification
Section 12.3 Appendix 3 
Study Governance 
Considerations
Made un-numbered subsections level 3 headings
Reorganized subsections to align with revised CPT
To align with revised CPT
Section 12.3.3 Appendix 3 
Informed Consent Process
Additional criteria added for IC process for written documentation to be 
obtained in accordance with relevant country and local privacy 
requirements.
To align with revised CPT
Section 12.3.5 Appendix 3 
Data Quality Assurance
Replaced requirement for records and documents to be retained for 15 years 
after study completion to requirement for them to be retained as per the 
clinical trial agreement.
To align with revised CPT
Section 12.3.9 Publication 
Policy
Section added
To align with revised CPT
Section 12.4 Appendix 4,
Adverse Events: Definitions 
and Procedures for 
Recording, Evaluating, 
Follow-up, and Reporting
Made un-numbered subsections level 3 headings
To align with revised CPT
Section 12.4.1 Appendix 4, 
Definition of AE
Revised procedures for reporting AESIs.
Identified specific AESIs (ie, Hy’s law cases, inadequate control of diabetes:  
hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia, and MACE).
To comply with Allergan’s current practices.
As required per current CPT.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
10
Section Number
Description of Change
Rationale
Section 12.5 Appendix 5, 
Contraceptive Guidance and 
Collection of Pregnancy 
Information
Female Participants Who Become Pregnant – deleted text that an elective 
termination is an AE or SAE; provided examples and details for abnormal 
pregnancy outcomes, including genetic abnormalities.
Deleted footnote “b” regarding hormonal contraception’s susceptible 
interactions with study intervention.
Pregnancy Testing – specified that pregnancy test should be performed as 
per SOA, instead of “at the end of relevant systemic exposure” as previously 
stated.  Specified “unless required by local regulations” when stating that 
pregnancy testing is not required during the treatment period or after the last 
dose of study treatment.
To align with revised CPT
Correction, as the information in footnote b is not 
relevant to this study intervention.
For clarity

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
11
Table of Contents
Title Page .........................................................................................................................................1
Protocol Amendment 3 Summary of Changes.................................................................................2
Table of Contents...........................................................................................................................11
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................14
List of Figures................................................................................................................................15
1.
Synopsis..........................................................................................................................16
2.
Schedule of Activities (SoA) ..........................................................................................21
3.
Introduction.....................................................................................................................26
3.1.
Study Rationale...............................................................................................................27
3.2.
Background.....................................................................................................................28
3.3.
Benefit/Risk Assessment ................................................................................................29
4.
Objectives and Endpoints ...............................................................................................30
4.1.
Clinical Hypotheses ........................................................................................................30
5.
Study Design...................................................................................................................31
5.1.
Overall Design ................................................................................................................31
5.2.
Participant and Study Completion ..................................................................................33
5.3.
End of Study Definition..................................................................................................33
5.4.
Scientific Rationale for Study Design ............................................................................34
5.5.
Justification for Dose......................................................................................................34
6.
Study Population.............................................................................................................35
6.1.
Inclusion Criteria ............................................................................................................35
6.2.
Exclusion Criteria ...........................................................................................................36
6.3.
Lifestyle Restrictions ......................................................................................................39
6.4.
Screen Failures................................................................................................................39
7.
Treatments ......................................................................................................................40
7.1.
Treatments Administered................................................................................................40
7.1.1.
Run-in Medications and Administration.........................................................................41
7.1.2.
Study Supplies ................................................................................................................41
7.2.
Dose Modification ..........................................................................................................42
7.3.
Method of Treatment Assignment ..................................................................................42
7.4.
Blinding ..........................................................................................................................42
7.5.
Preparation/Handling/Storage/Accountability................................................................42
7.6.
Treatment Compliance....................................................................................................43
7.7.
Concomitant Therapy .....................................................................................................43
7.7.1.
Prohibited Treatments.....................................................................................................43

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
12
7.7.2.
Permitted Treatments......................................................................................................45
7.7.3.
Rescue Medicine.............................................................................................................45
7.8.
Treatment after the End of the Study..............................................................................45
8.
Discontinuation/Withdrawal Criteria..............................................................................46
8.1.
Discontinuation of Study Treatment...............................................................................47
8.1.1.
Temporary Discontinuation ............................................................................................47
8.2.
Withdrawal from the Study.............................................................................................47
8.3.
Lost to Follow Up...........................................................................................................48
9.
Study Assessments and Procedures ................................................................................48
9.1.
Efficacy Assessments .....................................................................................................49
9.1.1.
Primary Efficacy Assessments........................................................................................49
9.1.2.
Secondary Efficacy Assessment .....................................................................................50
9.2.
Adverse Events ...............................................................................................................55
9.2.1.
Time Period and Frequency for Collecting AE and SAE 
Information .....................................................................................................................55
9.2.2.
Method of Detecting AEs and SAEs ..............................................................................55
9.2.3.
Follow-up of AEs and SAEs...........................................................................................56
9.2.4.
Regulatory Reporting Requirements for SAEs...............................................................56
9.2.5.
Pregnancy........................................................................................................................56
9.2.6.
Medical Device Incidents (Including Malfunctions) ......................................................56
9.2.7.
Adverse Events of Special Interest .................................................................................58
9.2.8.
Medication Errors ...........................................................................................................59
9.3.
Treatment of Overdose ...................................................................................................60
9.4.
Safety Assessments.........................................................................................................60
9.4.1.
Physical Examinations....................................................................................................60
9.4.2.
Vital Signs.......................................................................................................................60
9.4.3.
Electrocardiograms .........................................................................................................61
9.4.4.
Clinical Safety Laboratory Assessments ........................................................................61
9.4.5.
Hormonal Assessments...................................................................................................62
9.4.6.
Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose..................................................................................62
9.5.
Pharmacokinetics............................................................................................................62
9.6.
Pharmacodynamics .........................................................................................................63
9.7.
Genetics ..........................................................................................................................63

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
13
10.
Statistical Considerations................................................................................................65
10.1.
Sample Size Determination ............................................................................................65
10.2.
Populations for Analyses ................................................................................................65
10.3.
Statistical Analyses .........................................................................................................65
10.3.1.
Key Statistical Methodology...........................................................................................66
10.3.2.
Efficacy Analyses ...........................................................................................................66
10.3.3.
Safety Analyses...............................................................................................................68
10.3.5.
Interim Analyses .............................................................................................................69
11.
References.......................................................................................................................70
12.
Appendices......................................................................................................................73
12.1.
Appendix 1: Abbreviations.............................................................................................74

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
14
List of Tables
Table 7-1:
Study Treatment Details....................................................................................41
Table 7-2: 
Prohibited Medications and Washout Requirements ........................................44
Table 10-1:
Analysis Populations .........................................................................................65
Table 10-2:
Statistical Methodology.....................................................................................66
Table 10-3:
Primary and Secondary Endpoints ....................................................................67

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
15
List of Figures
Figure 1:
RLM-MD-02 Study Schematic .........................................................................19
Figure 2:
RLM-MD-02 Study Schematic .........................................................................32

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
16
1.
Synopsis
Protocol Title: A 12-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to 
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Relamorelin in Patients with Diabetic Gastroparesis
Brief Title: Diabetic Gastroparesis Study 2
Study Phase: 3
Study Rationale:
Previous non-clinical and Phase 1 studies have shown relamorelin to have a potent prokinetic 
effect on the stomach, accelerating gastric emptying (GE) in both healthy volunteers and patients 
with diabetic gastroparesis (DG). 
Gastroparesis (GP) is a disorder characterized by signs and symptoms of nausea, abdominal pain, 
postprandial fullness, bloating, vomiting, and early satiety along with delayed GE, such that 
movement of food from the stomach to the small intestine takes longer than normal and occurs 
with unpredictable timing. Diabetes mellitus, either type 1 or 2 (T1DM or T2DM), is considered 
to be the most common identifiable cause of GP. This complication is a result of chronically 
elevated blood glucose levels, which are known to damage nerve structure and function. DG 
complicates management of blood glucose for both T1DM and T2DM patients due to 
carbohydrates being delivered to and therefore absorbed from the small intestine at variable
times after ingestion. As a result, diabetic patients with DG often have poorly controlled diabetes, 
frequently with alternating hypo- and hyperglycemia, especially if treated with insulin.
In Phase 2 studies, the pharmacodynamic effect of relamorelin was confirmed in larger numbers 
of participants with DG, and in addition, beneficial effects on the symptoms of DG were 
observed. Safety and tolerability were shown at therapeutic doses, including the 10 μg twice 
daily (BID) dose to be studied in Phase 3 studies, supporting the decision to obtain confirmatory 
evidence of safety and efficacy of relamorelin in Phase 3, and specifically in Study RLM-MD-02.
A significant unmet medical need exists for a safe and effective treatment of patients with DG
whose quality of life is impacted by their disease and for whom the current standard of care is 
suboptimal; therefore, the sponsor is performing this study to further the development of
relamorelin for the treatment of DG.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
17
Objectives and Endpoints:
Objectives
Endpoints
Primary

To compare the efficacy of relamorelin with 
placebo in participants with DG with respect to a 
composite of the following core signs and 
symptoms of DG:

Nausea

Abdominal pain

Postprandial fullness 

Bloating

Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the weekly 
DGSSS. Baseline is defined as the average of the 
2 weekly DGSSS from the 2-week placebo Run-in 
Period.

To compare the efficacy of relamorelin with placebo 
in participants with DG with respect to vomiting 
frequency

Vomiting Responder, defined as a participant with 
zero weekly vomiting episodes during each of the 
last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period
Secondary

To compare the efficacy of relamorelin with placebo
in participants with DG with respect to the 
following individual symptoms of the DGSSS:

Nausea

Abdominal Pain

Postprandial fullness

Bloating

To compare the safety of relamorelin with placebo 
in participants with DG
Secondary

Individual Symptom (ie, nausea, abdominal pain, 
postprandial fullness, and bloating) Responder,
defined as a participant with at least a 2-point 
decrease in the change from baseline on the weekly 
average of the symptom severity (at its worst)
during each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week 
Treatment Period

AEs, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, ECGs, 
HbA1c, and anti-relamorelin antibodies
Overall Study Design:

Global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group

Treatment Groups: Relamorelin 10 μg or placebo subcutaneously (SC) twice daily (BID), 

Study Duration: Up to 18 weeks, including a Screening Period of up to 4 weeks, a 2-week 
Run-in Period, and a 12-week Treatment Period: 
o
Run-in Period: Participants who meet initial study entry criteria during the 
Screening Period will enter a 2-week Run-in Period, during which they will 
self-administer placebo twice daily SC. Using an electronic hand-held device, 
participants will report their symptoms via the Diabetic Gastroparesis 
Symptom Severity Diary (DGSSD) as well as their 
compliance, and use of rescue medication. 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
18
o
12-week Treatment Period: Participants who meet study entry criteria at the 
end of the Run-in Period, will be randomized 1:1 to blinded treatment with 
relamorelin 10 µg or placebo, and will continue to use the electronic hand-
held device for reporting of their symptoms via the DGSSD as well as their 
compliance, and use of rescue medication.
Assuming they meet entry criteria, participants who successfully complete this study are eligible, 
to enter a placebo-controlled, long-term safety and efficacy study (Study RLM-MD-03) during 
which they will receive study treatment for an additional 46 weeks.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
19
Figure 1:
RLM-MD-02 Study Schematic

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
20
Number of Participants:
Approximately 2500 participants will be screened to achieve 600 participants randomly assigned 
to study treatment (300 per treatment group). A total of 480 participants are expected to complete 
the study (240 per treatment group).
Study Population:

Screening: Males and females aged 18 years and older; T1DM or T2DM with controlled 
and stable blood glucose levels and HbA1c ≤ 11%; symptoms suggestive of DG for at 
least 3 months, with mechanical obstruction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as the cause 
of symptoms having been ruled out; history of at least 2 vomiting episodes. 

During the Run-in Period: at least 1 vomiting episode and delayed GE by gastric emptying 
breath test (GEBT) 

After Run-in Period: Evidence of compliance during the Run-in Period with the use of the 
electronic hand-held device for entry of data, with twice daily SC injections of the study 
treatment, no treatment with GI promotility agents during the Run-in Period, at least 
1 vomiting episode reported during the 2-week Run-in Period, and a score of ≥ 16 for the 
average of the daily Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS) 
assessments measured during the Run-in Period.
Number of Sites:
Approximately 350 sites (globally)

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment #3
Relamorelin
21

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment #3
Relamorelin
22

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment #3
Relamorelin
23

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment #3
Relamorelin
24

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment #3
Relamorelin
25

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
26
3.
Introduction
Relamorelin (also known as RM-131) is a novel, potent, and selective synthetic penta-peptide 
ghrelin analogue, which is being developed for treatment of diabetic gastroparesis (DG). 
Ghrelin, a 28 amino-acid peptide, is produced predominantly by specialized cells of the stomach 
and pancreas, and has been demonstrated to be a central modulator of energy homeostasis. It is 
the natural ligand for the Growth Hormone Secretagogue 1 α (GHS1α) receptor, a potential 
target for treatment of clinical conditions associated with impaired gastric motility and energy 
balance. Administration of ghrelin has been shown to promote gastric motility in mice, rats, 
dogs, and humans (Dornonville 2004; Trudel 2003; and Murray 2005). It can increase body 
weight, attributed to a combination of enhanced food intake, increased gastric emptying (GE), 
and increased food assimilation, coupled with a transient increase in growth hormone (GH), 
which promotes nutrient incorporation into tissues.
Relamorelin has similar characteristics to native ghrelin but with enhanced efficacy, plasma 
stability, and circulating half-life. As a ghrelin mimetic, it acts as a potent prokinetic agent, as 
evidenced by significant effects on GE as well as effects on overall colonic transit (Acosta 2015, 
Acosta 2016). 
Gastroparesis (GP) is a disorder characterized by delayed GE, such that movement of food from 
the stomach to the small intestine is delayed. The pathophysiology of GP has not been fully 
elucidated but seems to involve abnormalities in the autonomic nervous system (vagus nerve), 
smooth muscle cells, enteric neurons, and interstitial cells of Cajal; in DG, change in the type of 
macrophages in the gastric musculature suggest a role for inflammation as a cause of delayed 
GE. 
Diabetes mellitus, either type 1 or 2 (T1DM/T2DM), is considered to be the most common, 
specifically identifiable cause of GP. This complication is a result of chronically elevated blood 
glucose levels, which are known to damage nerve structure in general, and the vagus nerve in 
particular, and negatively affect function (Parkman 2004). 
DG is a chronic condition that requires prolonged treatment. Core signs and symptoms of DG are 
nausea, abdominal pain, post-prandial fullness, bloating, vomiting, and early satiety (a feeling of 
fullness after eating just a few bites) (Camilleri 2013). These symptoms can be debilitating and, 
when uncontrolled, have a significant negative impact on patient quality of life and functioning, 
including work productivity (Camilleri 2011, Parkman 2011). Serious adverse sequelae of DG 
include: potentially life-threatening dehydration due to persistent vomiting, gastroesophageal 
reflux disease (GERD) that can advance to esophagitis, formation of bezoars, difficulty 
managing blood glucose levels, and malnutrition due to poor absorption of nutrients or a low-
calorie intake (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2012). Aside from the impact on 
patients, these events often lead to hospitalization (Koch 2016), resulting in a high economic 
burden for health care systems.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
27
DG complicates management of blood glucose for both T1DM and T2DM patients due to 
carbohydrates being delivered to and therefore absorbed from the small intestine at unpredictable 
times (Rayner 2001). As a result, diabetic patients with DG often have poorly controlled
diabetes, frequently with alternating hypo- and hyperglycaemia, especially if treated with insulin.
Little data on the incidence and prevalence of GP are available; however, an older epidemiology
study of diagnosed GP (defined as typical symptoms plus confirmed delayed GE by 
scintigraphy) showed prevalence of 24.3 per 100,000 inhabitants and incidence of 6.3 per 
100,000 persons per year in Olmstead County, MN from 1996 to 2006 (Jung 2008). This study 
reported that age-adjusted prevalence of GP was approximately 4 times greater for women than 
men (37.8 versus 9.6 cases per 100,000 persons). It has been reported that 30% to 50% of 
diabetic patients have delayed GE, while the prevalence of the specific symptoms of GP (nausea 
and vomiting) is lower, with approximately 10% of patients with diabetes being affected 
(Hopkins Medicine, 2013). According to Bharucha (2015), in a restricted community-based 
study of GP in DM, the average cumulative incidence of symptoms and delayed GE over 
10 years was higher in T1DM (5%) than in T2DM (1%) and controls (1%). It is expected that the 
incidence of DG will increase worldwide in proportion to the increase in T2DM due to 
increasing obesity.
3.1.
Study Rationale
Previous non-clinical and Phase 1 studies have shown relamorelin to have a potent prokinetic 
effect on the stomach, accelerating GE in both healthy volunteers and participants with diabetic 
gastroparesis (DG).
GP is a disorder characterized by signs and symptoms of nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial 
fullness, bloating, vomiting, and early satiety along with delayed GE, such that movement of 
food from the stomach to the small intestine takes longer than normal and occurs with
unpredictable timing. Diabetes mellitus, either type 1 or 2 (T1DM or T2DM), is considered to be 
the most common identifiable cause of GP. This complication is a result of chronically elevated 
blood glucose levels, which are known to damage nerve structure and function. DG complicates 
management of blood glucose for both T1DM and T2DM patients due to carbohydrates being 
delivered to and therefore absorbed from the small intestine at variable times after ingestion. As 
a result, diabetic patients with DG often have poorly controlled diabetes, frequently with 
alternating hypo- and hyperglycemia, especially if treated with insulin.
In Phase 2 studies, the pharmacodynamic effect of relamorelin was confirmed in larger numbers 
of participants with DG, and in addition, beneficial effects on the symptoms of DG were 
observed. Safety and tolerability were shown at therapeutic doses, including the 10 μg twice 
daily (BID) dose to be studied in Phase 3 studies, supporting the decision to obtain confirmatory 
evidence of safety and efficacy of relamorelin in Phase 3, and specifically in Study RLM-MD-02.
A significant unmet medical need exists for a safe and effective treatment of patients with DG
whose quality of life is impacted by their disease and for whom the current standard of care is 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
28
suboptimal; therefore, the sponsor is performing this study to further the development of
relamorelin for the treatment of DG.
3.2.
Background
Relamorelin is being developed for the treatment of patients with DG to address the existing
unmet need for an effective and safe/tolerable treatment, attested to by the FDA’s granting of 
fast-track designation to relamorelin for the treatment of DG in adults. It is a member of an 
established class of compounds, ghrelin agonists, but if granted regulatory approval, will be the 
first member of this class to attain marketing approval.
In clinical studies to date, 466 participants with T1DM or T2DM with DG have been exposed to 
relamorelin at doses up to 100 μg administered BID by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 
12 weeks. 
In a randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose Phase 2a study (RM-131-004), participants
with T1DM and T2DM, and DG received 28 days of double-blind treatment with relamorelin. 
GE was accelerated and compared to placebo, relamorelin 10 µg BID significantly decreased the 
vomiting severity score and mean number of weekly vomiting episodes in participants with 
vomiting at baseline and produced improvement in the 4 individual DG symptoms of nausea, 
abdominal pain, bloating and early satiety as well as significant improvement in the composite 
endpoint of the 4 symptoms (p=0.043). The safety and tolerability profile of relamorelin in Study 
RM-131-004 was generally good.
The results in Study RM-131-004 helped the sponsor select the target patient population for 
enrolment in the Phase 2b Study RM-131-009, DG patients with vomiting at baseline, and 
encouraged assessment of a wider range of relamorelin doses.
Study RM-131-009 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified, multiple 
dose, multi-national study with 10 µg BID, 30 µg BID and 100 µg BID doses of relamorelin. A 
total of 393 participants with T1DM or T2DM, who had both delayed GE and moderate to severe 
symptoms of GP were enrolled and treated. The Phase 2b study confirmed a statistically 
significant effect of relamorelin over placebo on GE for the 10 µg and 30 µg doses. Vomiting 
frequency was reduced from baseline to Week 12 by approximately 75% in all relamorelin dose 
groups; however, there was also a strong, previously unobserved placebo effect on vomiting 
frequency (reduction of approximately 70%) that precluded statistical significance of the 
relamorelin effect that was observed. Results for the key secondary endpoint, a composite score 
of 4 DG symptoms (nausea, abdominal pain, bloating and early satiety) showed benefit of 
treatment with relamorelin compared to placebo although the difference was not statistically 
significant; the same was true for an exploratory endpoint, a composite score of 4 DG symptoms 
that included postprandial fullness instead of early satiety.
Relamorelin was generally safe and well tolerated among participants with T1DM or T2DM and 
DG. There were more reports of diarrhea and hyperglycemia-related events on relamorelin 
compared to placebo; hypoglycemia was infrequently reported (1.2% incidence in the placebo 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
29
and relamorelin 100 μg groups only). Twenty-three serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported 
in the 289 participants treated with the 3 doses of relamorelin and 8 in the 104 participants
treated with placebo. The number and characteristics of the reported SAEs reflected the 
advanced underlying disease state of this DG population with long-standing T1DM or T2DM 
and other common co-morbidities and only 2 of the SAEs (cardiac failure congestive and 
diabetes mellitus inadequate control) were assessed by the investigator as possibly related to 
study treatment, both in the 100-µg treatment group. Three adverse events (AEs) of diabetic 
ketoacidosis were reported, one event on each relamorelin dose. A total of 20 relamorelin-treated 
participants and 3 placebo-treated participants discontinued study treatment because of a 
treatment-emergent AE; only 3 in the relamorelin10 µg BID group.
With respect to laboratory findings, in some participants glycemic control may have been
negatively affected by the introduction of relamorelin. There were trends in increasing 
haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values after the initiation of relamorelin, which increased slightly
after approximately 8 weeks, and dose-related trends in fasting hyperglycemia. Otherwise, no 
clinically relevant abnormalities were seen for other laboratory tests, including liver function 
tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), physical examination findings, and injection site reactions; 
anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were not found.
A detailed description of the chemistry, pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of relamorelin is 
provided in the investigator’s brochure (Relamorelin Investigator’s Brochure).
3.3.
Benefit/Risk Assessment
Based on information about relamorelin obtained to date, the benefits of study participation are 
expected to include accelerated GE and clinically meaningful improvement in the symptoms of 
DG, including nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, bloating, vomiting frequency, early 
satiety, and vomiting severity. A potential risk of treatment is worsening of glycemic control, 
including the possibility of diabetic ketoacidosis occurring. However, preventive measures, 
including special laboratory assessments to allow early recognition by investigators and 
participants of rising glucose levels, are being included in this protocol so that early remedial 
action (eg, adjustment of medication and diet) may be taken to minimize increase in glucose 
levels; this might increase the incidence of hypoglycemic reactions, especially in participants
with T1DM. See Section 5 Study Design for details of study procedures, dose, and study design 
justification.
More detailed information about the known and expected benefits and risks and reasonably 
expected AEs associated with relamorelin are provided in the investigator’s brochure 
(Relamorelin Investigator’s Brochure); information about the investigational directions for use 
(DFU) for the pen injector, the device that will be used to administer study treatment are also 
provided.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
30
4.
Objectives and Endpoints
Objectives
Endpoints
Primary
Primary

To compare the efficacy of relamorelin with 
placebo in participants with DG with respect to a 
composite of the following core signs and 
symptoms of DG:

Nausea

Abdominal pain

Postprandial fullness 

Bloating

Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the weekly 
DGSSS. Baseline is defined as the average of the 
2 weekly DGSSS from the 2-week placebo Run-in 
Period.

To compare the efficacy of relamorelin with placebo 
in participants with DG with respect to vomiting 
frequency

Vomiting Responder, defined as a participant with 
zero weekly vomiting episodes during each of the 
last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period
Secondary

To compare the efficacy of relamorelin with placebo 
in participants with DG with respect to the 
following individual symptoms of the DGSSS:

Nausea

Abdominal Pain

Postprandial fullness

Bloating

To compare the safety of relamorelin with placebo 
in participants with DG
Secondary

Individual Symptom (ie, nausea, abdominal pain, 
postprandial fullness, and bloating) Responder, 
defined as a participant with at least a 2-point 
decrease in the change from baseline on the weekly 
average of the symptom severity (at its worst) 
during each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week 
Treatment Period 

AEs, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, ECGs, 
HbA1c, and anti-relamorelin antibodies
4.1.
Clinical Hypotheses
The clinical hypotheses are:
1) DG participants receiving relamorelin compared with DG participants receiving 
placebo will experience greater improvement in DGSSS. 
2) A greater proportion of DG participants receiving relamorelin than DG 
participants receiving placebo will achieve “Vomiting Responder” status, defined 
as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during each of the last 
6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
31
5.
Study Design
5.1.
Overall Design

Global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group 

Treatment Groups: Relamorelin 10 μg or placebo, twice daily, SC 

Study Duration: Up to 18 weeks, including a 12-week Treatment Period

Study Periods: A Screening Period of up to 4 weeks, a 2-week Run-in Period, and a 
12-week Treatment Period as follows:
o
Run-in Period: Participants who meet initial study entry criteria during the 
Screening Period will enter a 2-week placebo Run-in Period, during which 
they will self-administer single-blind placebo twice daily, SC. Using an 
electronic hand-held device, participants will report their symptoms via the 
Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary (DGSSD) as well as their 
compliance, and use 
of rescue medication. 
o
12-week Treatment Period: Participants who meet entry criteria at the end of 
the Run-in Period, will be randomized 1:1 to blinded treatment with 
relamorelin 10 µg or placebo. Participants will continue to use the electronic 
hand-held device for reporting of their symptoms via the DGSSD as well as 
their 
compliance, and use of rescue medication.
See Figure 2 for Study Schematic

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
32
Figure 2:
RLM-MD-02 Study Schematic

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
33
Study Population:

Screening: Males and females aged 18 years and older; T1DM or T2DM with controlled 
and stable blood glucose levels and HbA1c ≤ 11%; symptoms suggestive of DG for at 
least 3 months, with mechanical obstruction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as the cause 
of symptoms having been ruled out; history of at least 2 vomiting episodes. 

During the Run-in Period: At least 1 vomiting episode and delayed GE by gastric 
emptying breath test (GEBT)

After Run-in Period: Evidence of compliance during the Run-in Period with the use of the 
electronic hand-held device for entry of data, with twice daily SC injections of the study 
treatment, no treatment with GI promotility agents during the Run-in Period, at least 
1 vomiting episode reported during the 2-week Run-in Period; and a score of ≥16 for the 
average of the daily DGSSS assessments measured during the Run-in Period.
For studies conducted at US (IND) sites and non-US (non-IND) sites, data from IND and 
non-IND study sites will be pooled together for analysis.
Assuming they meet entry criteria, participants who successfully complete this study are eligible 
to enter a placebo-controlled, long-term safety and efficacy study (RLM-MD-03) during which 
they will receive study treatment for an additional 46 weeks.
5.2.
Participant and Study Completion
Approximately 2500 participants will be screened at approximately 350 study sites (globally) to 
achieve 600 participants randomly assigned to study treatment (300 participants per treatment 
group). A total of 480 participants are expected to complete the study (240 participants per 
treatment group). See Section 10.1 for details on sample size determination.
5.3.
End of Study Definition
The end of the study is defined as the date of the last visit of the last participant in the study.
A participant is considered to have completed the study if he/she has completed all phases of the 
study including at least 84 days of treatment, and the last visit (Visit 7). Independent of the end 
of study definition, all laboratory tests with values considered clinically significantly abnormal 
during participation in the study or within 30 days after the last dose of study treatment should be 
repeated until the values return to normal or baseline or are no longer considered clinically 
significant by the investigator or MSP.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
34
5.4.
Scientific Rationale for Study Design
The sponsor has designed this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group
study to follow regulatory recommendations for conduct of Phase 3 therapeutic confirmatory 
studies, specifically the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline E8 (General Considerations for 
Clinical Trials, Current Step 4 version dated 20 July 2000) and Guideline E10 (Choice of Control 
Group and Related Issues in Clinical Trials, Current Step 4 version dated 17 July 1997). The 
study also has been designed to comply with recommendations made by the US FDA, Center for 
Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) in the Draft Guidance for Industry, Gastroparesis: 
Clinical Evaluation of Drugs for Treatment, July 2015, including those for the minimum duration 
of studies to show efficacy (at least 12 weeks) and inclusion as part of the development plan of a 
long-term placebo-controlled safety study (12 months, with appropriate pre-specified provisions 
for rescue medications).
Several design features have been incorporated in the current study in an effort to minimize bias, 
including a placebo run-in and double-blind design. Random assignment of participants avoids 
bias and helps ensure that both known and unknown risk factors are distributed evenly between 
treatment groups. The use of a placebo control permits prospective comparison between the 
relamorelin group and the control group. Furthermore, the placebo run-in period with collection 
of data (symptoms in a daily diary) was incorporated into this study to allow study personnel to 
assess compliance with and tolerability of these procedures prior to randomization, and to obtain 
robust baseline measurements prior to initiating study treatment dosing. The run-in period also 
allows the confirmation of vomiting symptoms in addition to a history of vomiting.
5.5.
Justification for Dose
Study RM-131-009 was a 12-week Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 
parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of relamorelin in diabetic participants
with moderate to severe DG. The doses included within the study were 10 µg BID, 30 µg BID, 
and 100 µg BID. In general, all doses tested within RM-131-009 appeared to demonstrate 
meaningful reductions in overall DG symptom scores including vomiting episodes, with 
acceptable safety and tolerability. The frequency of vomiting episodes was reduced from 
baseline over the 12-week Treatment Period to a similar extent for participants who received the
3 doses of relamorelin and placebo. Based upon the observed dose response of change-from-
baseline symptom scores collected daily over the course of 12 weeks using the DGSSD, the 
30 µg BID, and 100 µg BID doses demonstrated apparent maximal symptom score 
improvements, while the 10 µg BID dose achieved near maximal improvements. Of note, the 
twice-a-day regimen of relamorelin appears to be necessary for effective symptom relief; the 
10 µg once daily study treatment did not demonstrate significant improvement in symptom relief 
compared to placebo after 28 days of dosing in Study RM-131-004.
Review of the safety laboratory data collected in RM-131-009 revealed an apparent dose-related 
increase in HbA1c values. Although the variability in HbA1c response was high across all
treatments, the 30 µg BID and 100 µg BID doses demonstrated apparent maximal changes in 
HbA1c values, while the 10 µg BID dose resulted in an approximately half-maximal increase 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
35
after 12 weeks of study. Shorter durations of treatment (4 weeks) with 10 µg BID of relamorelin, 
as observed in Study RM-131-004, did not demonstrate this apparent increase in HbA1c in 
diabetic participants.
Based on the efficacy and safety data, the relamorelin dose selected for this study is 10 µg BID.
6.
Study Population
Prospective approval of protocol deviations to recruitment and enrollment criteria, also known as 
protocol waivers or exemptions, is not permitted.
6.1.
Inclusion Criteria
Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all of the following criteria apply:
1. Male and female participants aged 18 years or older at screening (Visit 1)
4. DG defined as at least a 3-month history prior to screening (Visit 1) of symptoms on an 
ongoing basis that are suggestive of GP

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
36
10. Able to provide written informed consent (IC) prior to any study procedures and willing 
and able to comply with study procedures (as defined in Appendix 3)
6.2.
Exclusion Criteria
Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
3. Participants who are actively experiencing anorexia nervosa, binge-eating, bulimia, or 
other eating disorder at the time of Screening (Visit 1) are excluded regardless of when 
diagnosis was established.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
37
4. History of intestinal malabsorption (including celiac disease even if well-controlled on a 
gluten-free diet) or pancreatic exocrine insufficiency; also, history of non-celiac gluten 
sensitivity
5. History of belching disorders, other nausea and vomiting disorders (eg, chronic nausea 
and vomiting syndrome, cyclic vomiting syndrome, cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome), 
or rumination syndrome
10. Currently receiving parenteral feeding or presence of a nasogastric or other enteral tube 
for feeding or decompression

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
38
24. Functional dyspepsia diagnosed before the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
39
their advanced symptoms and, therefore, are unlikely to benefit from further pharmacological 
intervention have been excluded. Although GP invariably affects negatively the ability of 
participants to achieve optimum diabetic control, an attempt to achieve stable and controlled 
blood glucose levels must be made by the patient prior to enrollment.
6.3.
Lifestyle Restrictions
There are no specific dietary restrictions in the study. It is expected that participants are aware of 
the importance of maintaining reasonable consistency in timing and size of meals (and 
specifically carbohydrate intake) for achieving adequate control of hyperglycemia but appreciate 
that the presence of GP may make this difficult.
For timing of meals around the GEBT, refer to the Study Reference Manual.
6.4.
Screen Failures
Screen failures are defined as participants who consent to participate in the clinical study but are 
not subsequently randomly assigned to study treatment. Screen failures can fail to meet criteria 
for random assignment to study treatment in the study either before or after participation in the 
Run-in Period.
Participants who do not meet the criteria for participation in this study (screen failure) before 
entering the Run-in Period may be rescreened once if the reason for screen failure is only 
because of Inclusion Criterion 3 “HbA1c ≤11.0% at Screening (Visit 1).” In this specific 
situation, the patient may be rescreened after at least one month and no more than 6 months of 
further effort to achieve improved glycemic control, as indicated by HbA1c being ≤11.0%. 
Rescreening of a participant for any other reason is up to the discretion of the Sponsor and must 
be approved by the Sponsor prior to any rescreening procedures. The timeframe for rescreening 
is up to 6 months from the time of screen failure. Participants who enter the Run-in Period will 
not be allowed to be rescreened. Rescreening requires that a participant be assigned a new 
participant number and after repeating the Informed Consent Process, undergo all original 
screening assessments.
The sponsor may permit a participant with a positive UDS by immunoassay, at Screening 
(Visit 1) to continue in the Screening Period while confirmatory urine drug screen testing by a 
more specific method is carried out on an aliquot of the original urine sample. If the 
confirmatory test is negative, the initial positive urine drug screen will be considered to have 
been a false-positive urine drug screen and the participant can continue in screening. 
Confirmatory testing will be done at the discretion of the sponsor and must be approved by the 
sponsor prior to analysis. The significance of a positive UDS result for drugs prescribed for the 
participant (ie, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, but not opioids or cannabinoids) 
should be assessed by the investigator as to whether their stable-dose usage is clinically 
appropriate, and if so, should not be exclusionary; use of these prescribed drugs on an as-needed 
basis is not allowed.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
40
Some participants who screen fail after completing the Run-in Period in this study may be
eligible for entry into a parallel study (RLM-MD-04) but will still be considered screen failures 
in this study.
A minimal set of screen failure information is required to ensure transparent reporting of screen 
failure participants to meet the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 
publishing requirements and to respond to queries from regulatory authorities. Minimal 
information includes demography, screen failure details, eligibility criteria, and any SAE.
7.
Treatments
Study treatment is defined as any investigational treatments, marketed product, placebo, or 
medical device intended to be administered to a study participant according to the study protocol.
7.1.
Treatments Administered
Participants are to self-administer double-blind study treatment twice daily, SC, with the first 
daily dose being administered within approximately 30 minutes before the morning meal 
and the second daily dose within approximately 
30 minutes before the evening meal 
 If a participant does not 
eat morning or evening meals, study treatment should be administered during typical meal times 
. 
Should a participant miss a dose prior to either the morning or evening meal, he/she should
adjust his/her study treatment administration as follows:
Study treatment will be dispensed as pen injectors with pre-filled cartridges of either relamorelin 
or placebo. Study treatment details are provided in Table 7-1.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
41
Table 7-1:
Study Treatment Details
Study Treatment
Relamorelin
Placebo
Dosage Formulation
Pre-Filled Cartridge in Multi-dose 
Pen Injector
Pre-Filled Cartridge in Multi-dose 
Pen Injector
Unit Dose Strength
10 µg dose
N/A
Route of Administration
Subcutaneous
Subcutaneous
Dosing Instructions
Administer twice daily 
Administer twice daily 
Packaging and Labeling
Manufacturer
Allergan (Assembled Pen)
Allergan (Assembled Pen)
Injection Device
Utilize Multi-dose Pen Injector for 
the administration of the study 
treatment or placebo. 
Utilize Multi-dose Pen Injector for 
the administration of the study 
treatment or placebo. 
7.1.1.
Run-in Medications and Administration
Placebo (single-blind) should be self-administered twice daily
SC using the pen-injector.
7.1.2.
Study Supplies
1. The Allergan-manufactured medical devices 
 
 provided for use in this study are: (1) Prefilled Cartridge, and (2) Multi-dose 
Pen Injector.
2. Instructions for medical device use are provided in Relamorelin Pen Investigational 
Directions for Use.
3. Medical device incidents, including those resulting from malfunctions of the device, must 
be detected, documented, and reported by the investigator throughout the study (see 
Appendix 7).

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
42
7.2.
Dose Modification
Not applicable.
7.3.
Method of Treatment Assignment
All participants will be centrally assigned to randomized study treatment using an interactive 
web response system (IWRS). Before the study is initiated, the log-in information and directions 
for the IWRS will be provided to each site.
At the beginning of the 12-week Treatment Period, eligible participants will be randomized in a 
1:1 ratio to blinded treatment with relamorelin 10 µg or placebo. Randomization will be stratified 
by geographic region.
Study treatment will be dispensed at the study visits indicated in the Schedule of Activities 
(SoA) (Section 2).
Returned study treatment should not be re-dispensed to the participants.
7.4.
Blinding
The investigator, investigational staff, and participant will be fully blinded to study treatment 
during the 12-week Treatment Period; during the placebo Run-in Period, single-blind treatment 
with placebo is self-administered. All study treatment will be provided in identical pen injectors 
and cartons to maintain blinding of the study.
7.5.
Preparation/Handling/Storage/Accountability
1. The investigator or designee must confirm appropriate temperature conditions have been 
maintained during transit for all study treatment received and any discrepancies are reported 
and resolved before use of the study treatment.
2. Only participants enrolled in the study may receive study treatment, and only authorized site 
staff may supply or administer study treatment. All study treatments must be stored in a 
secure, environmentally controlled, and monitored (manual or automated) area in accordance 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
43
with the labelled storage conditions with access limited to the investigator and authorized site 
staff.
3. The investigator, institution, or the head of the medical institution (where applicable) is 
responsible for study treatment accountability, reconciliation, and record maintenance 
(ie, receipt, reconciliation, and final disposition records).
4. Further guidance and information for the final disposition of unused study treatment are 
provided in the Study Reference Manual. 
7.6.
Treatment Compliance
Study treatment compliance will be closely monitored by assessing the participant’s daily 
reporting of self-administered study treatment on the electronic hand-held device. Before 
dispensing new study treatment, study site personnel will make every effort to collect all unused 
study treatment. In the event of AE or intercurrent illness, dosing of study treatment can be 
stopped temporarily, for a maximum duration of 3 days. Should longer cessation of dosing be 
necessary, the investigator should contact the sponsor (Section 8.1.1).
The study centers will keep an accurate drug disposition record that specifies the amount of 
study treatment dispensed to each participant and the date of dispensing.
7.7.
Concomitant Therapy
Any medication or vaccine (including over-the-counter or prescription medicines, vitamins, 
and/or herbal supplements) that the participant is receiving at the time of enrollment or receives 
during the study must be recorded on the electronic case report form (eCRF) along with:

Reason for use

Dates of administration including start and end dates

Dosage information including dose and frequency
As much as possible, the dose and frequency of all concomitant medications taken for chronic 
conditions with the exception of diabetes mellitus (see Section 7.7.2) should be held stable 
during the study. The sponsor should be contacted if there are any questions regarding 
concomitant or prior therapy.
7.7.1.
Prohibited Treatments
The classes of drugs prohibited in the study are, with the exception of SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 
inhibitors, those that affect GI motility, either positively or negatively, and therefore could 
confound the assessment of the efficacy of study treatment on the signs and symptoms of DG. 
The SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 inhibitors are prohibited for 3 days prior to the GEBT done at the start 
of the Run-in Period in all participants and in a subset of participants at a subset of sites at Visit 7 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
44
or the Early Termination Visit. Their mechanism of action is through causing increased
glycosuria, which may affect interpretation of the GEBT results.
Table 7-2 provides a list of drug classes and treatments that are prohibited during the study and 
require washout during the placebo Run-in Period.
Table 7-2: 
Prohibited Medications and Washout Requirements

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
45
7.7.2.
Permitted Treatments
Any medication or vaccine (including over-the-counter or prescription medicines, vitamins, 
and/or herbal supplements) that the participant is receiving at the time of enrollment or receives 
during the study must be recorded in the eCRF along with:

Indication

Dates of administration including start and end dates

Dosage information including dose and frequency
DG participants enrolled in this study will likely consist mostly of participants receiving one or 
more prescription medications for blood-glucose control. Good clinical practice allows for 
frequent adjustment of medication by participants and their health care providers to minimize 
large fluctuations in glycemia, and this practice is encouraged in this study. It should be 
remembered that certain diabetic drugs (see Table 7-2) delay GE and are prohibited during this 
study. Other therapy considered necessary for the participant’s welfare may be given at the 
discretion of the investigator. If the permissibility of a specific medication/treatment is in 
question, please contact the sponsor.
The sponsor or designee should be contacted if there are any questions regarding concomitant or 
prior therapy.
7.7.3.
Rescue Medicine
Use of medications that may impact efficacy evaluations is strongly discouraged at any time after 
Visit 1 in the study. However, participants who experience severe symptoms of GP may receive 
a single day of treatment per week with an anti-emetic drug, but should avoid such treatment, if 
possible, during the 2-week Run-in Period, and on the day prior to and day of clinic visits during 
the Treatment Period. If a participant requires an anti-emetic drug (eg, 5-HT3 receptor 
antagonists, NK1 receptor antagonists) for more than 1 day a week, or requires an anti-emetic 
drug once weekly repeatedly (ie, for 3 consecutive weeks or more), the investigator should 
contact the sponsor to discuss the safety of the participant continuing study treatment.
The date of rescue-medication administration as well as the name and dosage regimen of the 
rescue medication should be recorded in the concomitant medications page of the eCRF.
7.8.
Treatment after the End of the Study
Assuming they meet entry criteria, participants who successfully complete this study are eligible 
to enter a placebo-controlled, long-term safety and efficacy study (LTSES) (RLM-MD-03) 
during which they will receive study treatment for an additional 46 weeks.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
46
Participants who prematurely discontinue from the study and participants who do not enter the 
long-term safety and efficacy study (Study RLM-MD-03) should follow up with the investigator
regarding treatment at the end of the study. 
8.
Discontinuation/Withdrawal Criteria
Reasons for discontinuation from study treatment and/or the study may include the following:

Adverse event

Completed

Death

Failure to meet randomization criteria

Lack of efficacy

Lost to follow-up

Other

Investigator decision

Pregnancy

Protocol deviation

Screen failure

Site terminated by sponsor

Study terminated by sponsor

Withdrawal by participant
The reason for discontinuation should be clearly documented on the appropriate eCRF. 
Discontinuation of study treatment also requires discontinuation from the study. (See Appendix 8
for Standard Discontinuation Criteria/Definitions.)

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
47
8.1.
Discontinuation of Study Treatment
Discontinuation of study treatment also requires discontinuation from the study. The following 
criteria should be evaluated:

Special attention should be paid to the appearance of abnormal laboratory test results 
suggesting severe, drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Discontinuation of study treatment 
for abnormal liver function should be considered by the investigator when a participant 
meets criteria for Hy’s law (See Section 9.2.7.1 and Appendix 6) or if the investigator 
believes that it is in best interest of the participant. 

ECGs should be carefully analyzed for findings pointing to potentially important cardiac 
events (also see Section 9.2.7.3). If a clinically significant finding is identified (including, 
but not limited to changes from baseline in QT interval corrected using QTcB or QTcF) 
after enrollment, the investigator or qualified designee should determine if the participant 
can continue in the study and if any change in participant management is needed. 
Generally, a QTc value of > 500 msec or an increase from baseline of > 60 msec after start 
of study treatment should prompt discontinuation of the participant from the study. 
Review of the ECG printed at the time of collection must be documented. Any new 
clinically relevant finding should be reported as an AE.

Female participants who become pregnant during the study must be discontinued from 
treatment immediately and withdrawn from the study. See Section 9.2.5 Pregnancy and 
Appendix 5 for further details regarding follow-up of the participant through the 
pregnancy.
See the SoA (Section 2) for data to be collected at the time of treatment discontinuation.
8.1.1.
Temporary Discontinuation
In the event of AE or intercurrent illness, dosing of study treatment can be stopped temporarily, 
for a maximum duration of 3 days. Should longer cessation of dosing be necessary, the 
investigator should contact the sponsor. The investigator should also contact the sponsor should 
either recurrence of the AE that prompted discontinuation or the appearance of a new AE that 
requires discontinuation be experienced after reintroduction of treatment to discuss the safety of 
this participant continuing study.
8.2.
Withdrawal from the Study

A participant may withdraw from the study at any time at his/her own request, or may be 
withdrawn at any time at the discretion of the investigator for safety, behavioral, 
compliance, or administrative reasons. An early termination visit must be performed as 
soon as possible after the decision to withdraw has been made by the participant or the 
decision to withdraw the participant has been made by the investigator.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
48

If the participant withdraws consent for disclosure of future information, the sponsor may 
retain and continue to use any data collected before such a withdrawal of consent.

If a participant withdraws from the study, he/she may request destruction of any samples 
taken and not tested, and the investigator must document this in the site study records.

See the SoA for data to be collected at the time of study discontinuation.
8.3.
Lost to Follow Up
A participant will be considered lost to follow-up if he or she repeatedly fails to return for 
scheduled visits and is unable to be contacted by the study site. 
The following actions must be taken if a participant fails to return to the clinic for a required 
study visit:

The site must attempt to contact the participant and reschedule the missed visit as soon as 
possible and counsel the participant on the importance of maintaining the assigned visit 
schedule and ascertain whether or not the participant wishes to and/or should continue in 
the study.

Before a participant is deemed lost to follow up, the investigator or designee must make 
every effort to regain contact with the participant (where possible, 3 telephone calls and, if 
necessary, a certified letter to the participant’s last known mailing address or local 
equivalent methods). These contact attempts should be documented in the participant’s 
medical record.

Should the participant continue to be unreachable, he/she will be considered to have 
withdrawn from the study with a primary reason of lost to follow-up.
9.
Study Assessments and Procedures

Study procedures and their timing are summarized in the SoA (Section 2).

Protocol waivers or exemptions are not allowed.

Safety concerns should be discussed with the sponsor immediately upon occurrence or 
awareness to determine if the participant should continue or discontinue study treatment.

Adherence to the study design requirements, including those specified in the SoA, is 
essential and required for study conduct.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
49

All screening evaluations must be completed and reviewed to confirm that potential 
participants meet all eligibility criteria. The investigator will maintain a screening log to 
record details of all participants screened and to confirm eligibility or record reasons for 
screening failure, as applicable. 

The maximum amount of blood collected from each participant over the duration of the 
study, including any extra assessments that may be required, will not exceed 
approximately 63 mL (plus approximately an additional 64 mL only for participants in the 
PK and hormone subset). Repeat or unscheduled samples may be taken for safety reasons 
or for technical issues with the samples.
9.1.
Efficacy Assessments
All primary and secondary efficacy assessments are derived from the DGSSD, a 7-item, 
patient-reported daily diary designed to assess the severity of 6 core signs and symptoms of 
DG—nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, bloating, vomiting, and early satiety—and 
the frequency of vomiting episodes (Appendix 15). DG symptoms are assessed using a 0 to 10 
numerical rating scale (NRS), on which 0 = “no” or “not at all uncomfortable” (ie, absence of the 
DG symptom) and 10 = “worst possible” or “most uncomfortable” (ie, worst experience of the 
DG symptom).
DGSSD entries are to be made daily at the same time every evening on the electronic hand-held 
device beginning the first day of the Run-in Period and continuing throughout the Treatment 
Period. Planned timepoints for all efficacy assessments are provided in the SoA (Section 2).
9.1.1.
Primary Efficacy Assessments
9.1.1.1.
DGSSS Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly DGSSS
The change from baseline to Week 12 in the weekly DGSSS has been selected as a primary 
endpoint in this study. 
DGSSS is derived as the sum of the daily DGSSD items of nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial 
fullness, and bloating. Weekly DGSSS is derived as the sum of the weekly averages of the 
DGSSD items of nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, and bloating. The worst possible 
DGSSS for the 4 DG symptoms is 40, and the best possible DGSSS is 0.
Baseline is the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the 2-week, placebo Run-in Period.
9.1.1.2.
Vomiting Responder
Vomiting Responder, based on the number of vomiting episodes, has been selected as a primary
endpoint in this study. 
A Vomiting Responder is defined as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during 
each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Vomiting is defined as throwing up 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
50
the contents of the stomach. This does not include retching or dry heaving (also known as dry 
vomiting) when no stomach contents are thrown up.
Vomiting frequency will be captured during the placebo Run-in Period and the 12-week 
Treatment Period. Participants will be asked to indicate the number of vomiting episodes 
experienced in the day since the previous entry made, with information provided as to what 
constitutes a “vomiting episode” in order to ensure accurate reporting. 
9.1.2.
Secondary Efficacy Assessment
9.1.2.1.
DGSSS Individual Item Responders
The individual items assessing nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, and postprandial fullness will 
be assessed as secondary endpoints using the following response definition:

Individual symptom response is defined as an improvement of ≥ 2-points in the weekly 
symptom scores for each individual item at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week 
Treatment Period 
Psychometric analyses have shown that a decrease in individual symptom scores by ≥2 points is 
recognized as a clinically meaningful improvement in DG symptoms by affected patients 
(Psychometric Evaluation, RTI Health, 2017).

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
51

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
52

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
53

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
54

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
55

No, my appetite has stayed the same
9.2.
Adverse Events
The definitions of an AE or SAE can be found in Appendix 4.
AEs will be reported by the participant or noted by the investigator. 
The investigator and any designees are responsible for detecting, documenting, and recording 
events that meet the definition of an AE or SAE and remain responsible for following up AEs 
that are serious, considered related to the study treatment or study procedures, or that caused the 
participant to discontinue the study treatment (see Section 8). 
9.2.1.
Time Period and Frequency for Collecting AE and SAE Information 
All AEs and SAEs will be collected from the signing of the Informed Consent Form (ICF) until 
30 days after the final visit in the study (Visit 7) or Early Termination Visit, at the timepoints 
specified in the SoA (Section 2).
Medical occurrences that begin before the start of study treatment but after obtaining IC will be 
recorded in the AE section of the eCRF and will be considered pretreatment AEs.
All SAEs will be recorded and reported to the sponsor or designee within 24 hours, as indicated 
in Appendix 4. The investigator will submit any updated SAE data to the sponsor within 
24 hours of it being available.
Investigators are not obligated to actively seek AE or SAE in former study participants. However, 
if the investigator learns of any SAE, including a death, at any time after a participant has been 
discharged from the study, and he/she considers the event to be reasonably related to the study 
treatment or study participation, the investigator must promptly notify the sponsor.
The method of recording, evaluating, and assessing causality of AE and SAE and the procedures 
for completing and transmitting SAE reports are provided in Appendix 4.
9.2.2.
Method of Detecting AEs and SAEs
Care will be taken not to introduce bias when detecting AEs and/or SAEs. Open-ended and non-
leading verbal questioning of the participant is the preferred method to inquire about AE 
occurrences. 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
56
9.2.3.
Follow-up of AEs and SAEs
After the initial AE/SAE report, the investigator is required to proactively follow each participant 
at subsequent visits/contacts. All SAEs, AEs, and non-serious AEs of special interest ([AESI] as 
defined in Appendix 4) will be followed until resolution, stabilization, the event is otherwise 
explained, or the participant is lost to follow-up (as defined in Section 8.3). Further information 
on AE/SAE follow-up procedures is given in Appendix 4.
9.2.4.
Regulatory Reporting Requirements for SAEs

Prompt notification by the investigator to the sponsor of a SAE is essential so that legal 
obligations and ethical responsibilities towards the safety of participants and the safety of 
a study treatment under clinical investigation are met. 

The sponsor has a legal responsibility to notify both the local regulatory authority and 
other regulatory agencies about the safety of a study treatment under clinical investigation. 
The sponsor will comply with country-specific regulatory requirements relating to safety 
reporting to the regulatory authority, Institutional Review Boards (IRB)/Independent 
Ethics Committees (IEC), and investigators, including the head of the study center if 
required.

Investigator safety reports must be prepared for suspected unexpected serious adverse 
reactions (SUSAR) according to local regulatory requirements and sponsor policy and 
forwarded to investigators as necessary.

An investigator who receives an investigator safety report describing a SAE or other 
specific safety information (eg, summary or listing of SAEs) from the sponsor will review 
and then file it along with the investigator’s brochure and will notify the IRB/IEC, if 
appropriate according to local requirements.
9.2.5.
Pregnancy

Details of all pregnancies in female participants and female partners of male participants 
will be collected after the start of study treatment and until 7 days after the last dose.

If a pregnancy is reported, the investigator should inform the sponsor within 24 hours of 
learning of the pregnancy and should follow the procedures outlined in Appendix 5.

Abnormal pregnancy outcomes (eg, spontaneous abortion, fetal death, stillbirth, 
congenital anomalies, ectopic pregnancy) are considered SAEs.
9.2.6.
Medical Device Incidents (Including Malfunctions)
Medical devices are being provided for use in this study for the purpose of study medication self-
administration. In order to fulfill regulatory reporting obligations worldwide, the investigator is 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
57
responsible for the detection and documentation of events meeting the definitions of incident or 
malfunction that occur during the study with such devices. 
The definition of a Medical Device Incident can be found in Appendix 7.
NOTE: Incidents fulfilling the definition of an AE/SAE will also follow the processes outlined in 
Section 9.2 and Appendix 4 of the protocol. 
9.2.6.1.
Time Period for Detecting Medical Device Incidents

Medical device incidents or malfunctions of the device that result in an incident will be 
detected, documented, and reported during all periods of the study in which the medical 
device is used. 

If the investigator learns of any incident at any time after a participant has been discharged 
from the study, and such incident is considered reasonably related to a medical device 
provided for the study, the investigator will promptly notify the sponsor.
The method of documenting Medical Device Incidents is provided in Appendix 7.
9.2.6.2.
Follow-up of Medical Device Incidents

All medical device incidents involving an AE will be followed and reported in the same 
manner as other AEs (see Section 9.2). This applies to all participants, including those 
who discontinue study treatment.

The investigator is responsible for ensuring that follow-up includes any supplemental 
investigations as indicated to elucidate the nature and/or causality of the incident.

New or updated information will be recorded on the originally completed form with all 
changes signed and dated by the investigator.
9.2.6.3.
Prompt Reporting of Medical Device Incidents to Sponsor

Medical device incidents will be reported to the sponsor within 24 hours after the 
investigator determines that the event meets the protocol definition of a medical device 
incident.
9.2.6.4.
Regulatory Reporting Requirements for Medical Device Incidents

The investigator will promptly report all incidents occurring with any medical device 
provided for use in the study in order for the sponsor to fulfill the legal responsibility, if 
needed, to notify appropriate regulatory authorities and other entities about certain safety 
information relating to medical devices being used in clinical studies.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
58

The investigator, or responsible person according to local requirements (eg, the head of 
the medical institution), will comply with the applicable local regulatory requirements 
relating to the reporting of incidents to the IRB/IEC.
9.2.7.
Adverse Events of Special Interest
9.2.7.1.
Hy’s Law
Study site personnel must report every participant who meets potential Hy’s Law criteria which 
are as follows: 

ALT or AST ≥ 3 × upper limits of normal (ULN) AND 

Total bilirubin ≥ 2 × ULN AND 

Alkaline phosphatase < 2 × ULN
Typically, all analytes will be obtained from the same sample, but they may come from multiple 
samples taken within a 24-hour period. This requirement applies from the time the participant 
signs the ICF for the study until 30 days after the final protocol-defined study visit or the last 
known dose of study treatment (if the final visit does not occur). 
A laboratory alert for potential Hy’s laws cases will be in place. Investigators and the sponsor 
must be immediately notified when the above criteria have been met. A potential Hy’s law case 
must be faxed to the sponsor’s SAE/Pregnancy fax number on an Abnormal Liver Function 
Reporting Form (GPSE-PVOPS-F-01-28) and SAE form within 24 hours of learning of the 
potential Hy’s law case to the SAE/Pregnancy fax number, even if no AE has occurred
(Appendix 4). The eCRF for potential Hy’s law cases must be completed within 7 calendar days. 
Every effort to determine the cause of the liver enzyme abnormalities must be made, and close 
monitoring should be initiated in conjunction with the MSP and in accordance with the FDA 
Guidance for Industry, Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation, July 2009.
Additional details regarding liver safety assessments and follow up are provided in Appendix 6.
9.2.7.2.
Inadequate Control of Diabetes:  Hyperglycemia and Hypoglycemia
The irregular and delayed emptying of the stomach in DG has a major effect on the presentation 
of ingested carbohydrate to the small intestine for absorption, complicating the dosing of 
hypoglycemic agents (including insulin) used to manage glycemia. Participants should be closely 
monitored for changes to their diabetes control while in the study, and events related to 
hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia that are considered to be clinically significant should be 
reported as AEs (Section 9.2.1).

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
59
9.2.7.3.
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events 
Patients with diabetic gastroparesis typically have long-standing diabetes mellitus, which 
predisposes them to develop macrovascular (and microvascular) complications. These include 
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), commonly defined as death from cardiovascular 
causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and often also including 
revascularization (coronary or peripheral) procedures, and hospitalization for unstable angina 
pectoris. 
In this study, occurrence of any of these events should be reported to the MSP within 24 hours of 
being made aware on the SAE form, followed by a complete report including narrative 
description of the event, test results, and copies of hospital records, if applicable. All reports of 
possible MACE will be adjudicated internally in a blinded fashion by a committee of qualified 
physicians on a periodic basis depending on the frequency of reported events. The functioning of 
the committee will be governed by charter.
9.2.8.
Medication Errors
Medication error refers to any unintended error in the dosing and/or administration of the study 
treatment as per instructions in the protocol. Medication errors generally fall into 4 categories as 
follows:

Wrong study drug/device

Wrong dose (including dosing regimen, strength, form, concentration, amount)

Wrong route of administration

Wrong participant (ie, not administered to the intended participant)
Medication errors include occurrences of overdose and underdose of the study treatment.
Overdose: Unintentional administration of a quantity of the study treatment given per 
administration or per day that is above the maximum recommended dose (10 µg BID or 
20 µg/day) according to the reference safety information or protocol for the study treatment or 
comparator as applicable. This also takes into account cumulative effects due to overdose. 
Underdose: Unintentional administration of a quantity of the study treatment given per 
administration or per day that is under the minimum recommended dose according to the 
reference safety information or protocol. Since there is no clinical information on the efficacy of 
relamorelin at a dose less than 10 µg BID, a dose of 10 µg once daily should be considered an 
underdose.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
60
9.3.
Treatment of Overdose
The sponsor does not recommend specific treatment for an overdose. 
In the event of an overdose, the investigator should:
1. Contact the MSP immediately.
2. Closely monitor the participant for any AE/SAE and laboratory abnormalities until study 
treatment can no longer be detected systemically.
3. Document the quantity of the excess dose as well as the duration of the overdose in the 
site’s source documents for the participant.
Decisions regarding dose interruptions or modifications will be made by the investigator in 
consultation with the MSP based on the clinical evaluation of the participant.
9.4.
Safety Assessments
Planned timepoints for all safety assessments are provided in the SoA (Section 2).
9.4.1.
Physical Examinations
Complete physical examinations (excluding pelvic exam in women and genital exam in men, and 
rectal exam in both genders) are to be performed. Symptom-directed (abbreviated) physical 
examinations, including evaluation of the injection sites for clinically significant reactions, will 
be conducted as required at other study visits.
Participants should be weighed with no shoes, in light clothing, without any outerwear; height to 
be measured only at Visit 1. The weight taken at Visit 2 is to be used for the GEBT and will not 
be recorded in the eCRF. 
Any abnormality noted during the physical examination performed at Visit 7 or the early 
termination visit that was not present during the physical examination at Visit 1 should be 
reported as an AE if considered by the investigator to be clinically significant.
9.4.2.
Vital Signs

Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), and 
temperature will be assessed; the method for measuring temperature will be per the site’s 
preference.

BP and HR measurements will be assessed in the sitting position with a completely 
automated device. Manual techniques will be used only if an automated device is not 
available.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
61

BP and HR measurements should be preceded by at least 3 minutes of rest for the 
participant in a quiet setting without distractions (eg, television, cell phones).

Vital signs are to be taken before blood collection for laboratory tests. 
9.4.3.
Electrocardiograms

Single 12-lead ECG will be obtained as outlined in the SoA (see Section 2) using an ECG 
machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and QTc 
intervals. Refer to Section 8.1 for QTc withdrawal criteria; also see Section 9.2.7.3 for 
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.
9.4.4.
Clinical Safety Laboratory Assessments

See Appendix 2 for the list of clinical laboratory tests to be performed and refer to the SoA 
(Section 2) for the timing and frequency. 

The investigator must review the laboratory report, document this review, and record any 
clinically relevant changes occurring during the study in the AE section of the eCRF. The 
laboratory reports must be filed with the source documents. Clinically significant 
abnormal laboratory findings are those that are not associated with the underlying disease, 
unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's 
condition.

All laboratory tests with values considered clinically significantly abnormal during 
participation in the study or within 30 days after the last dose of study treatment should be 
repeated until the values return to normal or baseline or are no longer considered clinically 
significant by the investigator or MSP.
o
If such values do not return to normal/baseline within a period of time judged 
reasonable by the investigator, the etiology should be identified and the 
sponsor notified.
o
All protocol-required laboratory assessments, as defined in Appendix 2, must 
be conducted in accordance with the laboratory manual and the SoA.
o
If laboratory values from non-protocol specified laboratory assessments 
performed at the institution’s local laboratory require a change in participant 
management or are considered clinically significant by the investigator 
(eg, SAE or AE or dose modification), then the results must be recorded in the 
eCRF.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
62
9.4.5.
Hormonal Assessments
In a subset of participants (approximately 100 in total), at a subset of sites, investigation of the 
effects of study treatment on levels of hormones potentially affected by relamorelin will be 
carried out. These hormones are GH, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), insulin, glucagon, c-
peptide, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cortisol. The participants will be those who 
will undergo the PK assessment at selected sites. A single fasting blood specimen will be 
obtained for measurement of the hormones and fasting blood glucose (FBG) at the visits noted in 
the SoA (Section 2). 
9.4.6.
Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose
Participants will be strongly encouraged to carry out self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) 
at home in order to achieve and maintain optimum glucose control during the study. This is 
almost always required by patients with T1DM and is good clinical practice in patients with 
T2DM. Sponsor may provide each participant with a glucose monitor, test strips, and all supplies 
necessary for testing finger-stick capillary blood glucose. It is recommended that this be done 
twice daily, pre-breakfast (fasting) and approximately 2 hours post-lunch or dinner (whichever is 
the larger meal). 
Information from SMBG, in addition to that provided by values of HbA1c, and FBG, will be 
available to investigators for decision-making regarding adjustment of diabetic medications, diet, 
and exercise (or, alternatively, for decision-making regarding referral of the patient to his/her 
health care provider for the same purpose).
9.5.
Pharmacokinetics
Sparse plasma samples of approximately 2 mL per sample will be collected at a subset of sites on 
a subset of participants to estimate concentrations of relamorelin. These sites will be selected by 
the sponsor to ensure the appropriate sample handling requirements can be met. In total, 
approximately 100 participants will be recruited to provide sparse samples.
The dosing of relamorelin and samples collected will occur at the following intervals: 

At Visit 3, administration of the first dose of study treatment will occur at the site, with the 
time and date recorded. PK samples will be collected within 0.5 hours before dose 
administration, between 0.5 hours and 1 hour after dose administration, and between 
1.5 hours and 3.0 hours after dose administration. 

At Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, and Visit 7, participants are to administer the morning dose of 
study treatment at home, and provide the site with the date and time of the dose 
administration. During these visits, a single PK sample will be collected between 
0.5 hours and 6.0 hours after dose administration, dependent on the timing of the clinic 
visit. At the Early Termination Visit, a single PK sample will be collected irrespective of 
the time of the last dose administration.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
63
In addition, plasma samples of approximately 4 mL will also be collected to assess the formation 
of anti-relamorelin antibodies in all study participants. Samples will be collected at 
Visit 3/Baseline, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 7, or Early Termination Visit.
9.6.
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacodynamic parameters are not evaluated in this study.
9.7.
Genetics
Genetics are not evaluated in this study.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
64

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
65
10.
Statistical Considerations
10.1.
Sample Size Determination
The sample size and statistical power for the DGSSSS endpoint was assessed by simulation. 
Data were simulated for the DGSSS over time under the assumption of a multivariate normal 
distribution and based on mean responses in Study RM-131-009 variance - covariance structure 
(Table 14.1 of the SAP). A missing completely at random (MCAR) dropout rate of 20% by 
Week 12 was assumed for each treatment.
Vomiting response rates were assumed to be those observed in Study RM-131-009 (26% and 
11% for treatment and placebo respectively). Sample size was assessed using the POWER 
procedure in SAS.
The sample size of approximately 300 participants per arm will provide more than 90% power to 
reject at least one of the primary null hypotheses using the multiplicity approach described in 
Section 10.3 of the SAP.
10.2.
Populations for Analyses
The analysis populations will consist of participants as defined in Table 10-1.
Table 10-1:
Analysis Populations
Population
Definition
Screened
All screened participants who signed the ICF
Intent-to-treat (ITT)
All randomized participants
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT)
All randomized participants with ≥ 1 post-baseline assessment of 
DGSSD 
Pharmacokinetic
All randomized participants who agreed to volunteer for sparse 
PK collection, and provided > 2 evaluable samples during the 
double-blind treatment period
Safety
All participants who received ≥ 1 administration of double-blind 
study treatment
10.3.
Statistical Analyses
The SAP will be developed and finalized before database lock and will describe the participant
populations to be included in the analyses, and procedures for accounting for missing, unused, 
and spurious data. This section is a summary of the planned statistical analyses of the primary 
and secondary endpoints.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
66
10.3.1.
Key Statistical Methodology
The methodologies defined in Table 10-2 apply as specified to individual endpoints defined in 
this protocol. All statistical tests will be 2-sided hypothesis tests performed at the 5% level of 
significance for main effects. All CIs will be 2-sided 95% CIs, unless stated otherwise.
Table 10-2:
Statistical Methodology
Methodology
Description
Categorical counts

Number of participants in individual categories
a.
Participants with ≥ 1 qualifying event counted once per individual category
Categorical
descriptives

Number and percentage of participants in individual categories
a.
Participants with ≥ 1 qualifying event counted once per individual category

N1 if percentage denominator ≠ number of participants in the population (standard 
percentage denominator)
a.
N1 = participants with nonmissing baseline value
Event descriptives

Number and percentage of events in individual categories
a.
Events counted individually for each instance

Percentage denominator = total number of events
Continuous 
descriptives

N1, mean, SD, median, minimum, maximum

N1 = participants with nonmissing value
CFB descriptives

Continuous descriptives for baseline, postbaseline, and change from baseline (CFB) 
values

N1 = participants with nonmissing values at both baseline and the specified 
postbaseline analysis visit
Responder

Categorical descriptives for responders and nonresponders
a.
Nonresponders include:
i.
Participants who do not meet responder criteria
ii.
Participants with no postbaseline values

Risk differences and Wald CIs vs [placebo/active comparator]

Estimates derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model controlling for 
factors (treatment group, region)
a.
Mantel-Haenszel (MH) odds ratios (ORs) and CIs vs placebo
b.
P-values comparing treatment group vs placebo

N1 = all participants unless otherwise specified
CFB

Continuous descriptives for CFB

Estimates derived from mixed-effects model with repeated measures including fixed 
effects for geographic region, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction, as well 
as baseline and baseline-by-week interaction values as the covariates
a. LS mean and LS mean difference (CIs) between treatment group and placebo
b. P-values comparing treatment group vs placebo
10.3.2.
Efficacy Analyses
10.3.2.1.
Primary and Secondary Endpoints
Table 10-3 displays the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints that will be analyzed for the 
mITT population. All other efficacy endpoints and analyses will be defined in the SAP.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
67
Table 10-3:
Primary and Secondary Endpoints
Primary Endpoints
Description
Timing
Methodology
CFB to Week 12 in 
weekly DGSSS
Change from baseline to Week 12 in 
weekly DGSSS
Week 12
CFB
Vomiting Responder
Vomiting responder during last 6 weeks of 
treatment 
Last 6-weeks of 
Treatment Period
Responder
Secondary Endpoints 
Nausea Responder
Nausea responder during last 6 weeks of 
treatment
Last 6-weeks of 
Treatment Period
Responder
Abdominal Pain 
Responder
Abdominal Pain responder during last 6 
weeks of treatment
Last 6-weeks of 
Treatment Period
Responder
Bloating Responder
Bloating responder during last 6 weeks of 
treatment
Last 6-weeks of 
Treatment Period
Responder
Postprandial Fullness 
Responder
Postprandial Fullness responder during last 
6 weeks of treatment
Last 6-weeks of 
Treatment Period
Responder
10.3.2.2.
Multiple Comparisons Procedure
To control the overall type-1 error rate of the study, a multiplicity adjustment will be applied to 
the primary and secondary endpoints. For that purpose, the hypotheses of interest will be 
grouped into the two families described below: 

Family 1:
o
Hypothesis H1: Comparison of relamorelin versus placebo in the change from 
baseline to Week 12 in weekly DGSSS 
o
Hypothesis H2: Comparison of relamorelin versus placebo in Vomiting 
response rate 

Family 2: 
o
Hypotheses H3-H6: Comparison of relamorelin versus placebo in the response 
rates of the individual symptoms comprising DGSSS (ie, nausea, abdominal 
pain, postprandial fullness, and bloating)
The multiple testing will be performed in two Steps as follows: 
Step 1: Treatment comparisons to placebo in the DGSSS and vomiting response rates will be 
performed using the truncated Holm test at alpha=0.05. A truncation parameter of 0.5 will be 
used. 

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
68
Step 2: If any of the comparisons at Step 1 is significant, the treatment comparisons to placebo in 
the individual symptoms response rates will be performed using the regular Holm test at a level 
alpha which depends on the unused alpha from Step 1. 
Details for other efficacy analyses are provided in the SAP.
10.3.2.3.
Missing Data
Participants with a missing weekly value for vomiting frequency or the individual symptoms 
comprising the DGSSS (ie, nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, and bloating) during 
any of the last 6 weeks will be analyzed as a non-responder for the endpoint. 
Analysis for 2 primary endpoints based on multiple imputations (MI) as proposed by Little and 
Rubin (1987) will also be provided MI for weekly vomiting episodes, will be performed under 
both missing at random and the missing not at random (MNAR) assumptions, and MI for change 
from baseline in the weekly DGSSS will be performed only under MNAR assumption. 
Detailed methods and procedures for the above outlined missing data-derived sensitivity
analyses, planned or exploratory, will be documented in the final SAP prior to the study 
completion.
10.3.3.
Safety Analyses
All safety analyses will be performed on the Safety Population. 
The following safety categories will be summarized as appropriate (eg, categorical or continuous 
descriptives, shift tables) for the safety population and will be fully defined in the SAP.

AEs
o
Clinically significant hyperglycemia- and hypoglycaemia-related events

Clinical laboratory assessments
o
Potential Hy’s law cases

Vital signs

ECGs

Study-specific assessments
o
HbA1c

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
69
10.3.5.
Interim Analyses 
In addition to the above, monitoring of patient safety data will be performed by an independent 
Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB will review interim safety data at 
defined intervals throughout the study. The DSMB will communicate their recommendations to 
the sponsor after each meeting but will serve in an advisory capacity only; the Board will not be 
empowered to stop the study or require changes in the protocol. Study conduct may be 
interrupted or terminated by the sponsor based on DSMB recommendation if safety data become 
available which appear to represent an undue risk to the study participants’ health or well-being. 
Further details of the DSMB (composition, policy, and procedures) are specified in a separate 
DSMB Charter.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
70
11.
References
All references are available upon request.
Acosta A, Camilleri M, Kolar G, et al. Relamorelin relieves constipation and accelerates colonic 
transit in a phase 2, placebo controlled, randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2015;13(13):2312-2319.e1.
Acosta A, Camilleri M, Busciglio I, et al. Short-term effects of relamorelin on descending colon 
motility in chronic constipation: a randomized, controlled trial. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2016;61(3):852-
860.
Bharucha AE. Epidemiology and natural history of gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 
2015;44(1):9-19.
Camilleri M, Bharucha AE, Farrugia G. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and management of 
diabetic gastroparesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(1):5-12.
Camilleri M, Parkman HP, Shafi MA, et al. Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am 
J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(1):18-37.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measuring Healthy Days. Atlanta, Georgia: CDC, 
November 2000.
de la Loge C, Trudeau E, Marquis P, et al. Cross-cultural development and validation of a patient 
self-administered questionnaire to assess quality of life in upper gastrointestinal disorders: the 
PAGI-QOL. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(10):1751-1762. 
de la Loge C, Trudeau E, Marquis P, et al. Responsiveness and interpretation of a quality of life 
questionnaire specific to upper gastrointestinal disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 
2004;2(9):778-786.
Dornonville de la Cour C, Lindström E, Norlén P, et al. Ghrelin stimulates gastric emptying but 
is without effect on acid secretion and gastric endocrine cells. Regul Pept, 2004;120(1-3):23-32.
Hopkins Medicine, 2013. 
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/gastroenterology_hepatology/_pdfs/esophagus_stomach/gastro
paresis.pdf. Accessed 04Nov2015.
Jung HK, Choung RS, Locke GR, et al. The incidence, prevalence and survival of gastroparesis 
in Olmsted County, Minnesota: 1996-2006. Gastroenterology 2008;134(suppl 1):A534–A535.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
71
Koch KL, Hasler WL, Yates KP, et al. Baseline features and differences in 48 week clinical 
outcomes in patients with gastroparesis and type 1 vs type 2 diabetes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 
2016;28(7):1001-1015.
Little RJA and Rubin DB (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. John Wiley & Sons, 
New York.
Murray CDR, Martin NM, Patterson M, et al. Ghrelin enhances gastric emptying in diabetic 
gastroparesis: a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Gut. 2005;54(12):1693–1698. 
Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Fisher RS. American Gastroenterological Association technical review 
on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis. Gastroent 2004;127:1592-1622.
Parkman HP, Yates K, Hasler WL, et al. National Institute of Diabetes Digestive Kidney 
Diseases Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium. Similarities and differences between 
diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9:1056–1064.
Rayner CK, Samsom M, Jones KL, et al. Relationships of upper gastrointestinal motor and 
sensory function with glycaemic control. Diabetes Care 2001;24:371–381.
Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and 
activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics 1993;4:353-365.
Rentz AM, Kahrilas P, Stanghellini V, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the 
patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal symptom severity index (PAGI-SYM) in patients 
with upper gastrointestinal disorders. Qual Life Res. 2004 Dec;13(10):1737-1749.
Revicki DA, Camilleri M, Kuo B, Norton NJ, Murrary L, Palsgrove A, Parkman HP. 
Development and content validity of a gastroparesis cardinal symptom index daily diary. 
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30(6):670-680.
RTI Health Solutions, Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity 
Diary Using RM-131-009 Data, Report on file. Allergan, Jersey City NJ, 2017.
Trudel L, Bouin M, Tomasetto C, et al. Two new peptides to improve post-operative gastric ileus 
in dog. Peptides 2003;24:531–534.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for 
Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation. July 2009. 
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Guidances/UCM174090.pdf Accessed 02Jan2018.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance 
for Industry Gastroparesis: Clinical Evaluation of Drugs for Treatment. July 2015. 
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U
CM455645.pdf Accessed 23Nov2015.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
72
U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services, National Institutes of Health Publication No. 
12–4348 June 2012. http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-topics/digestive-
diseases/gastroparesis/Documents/Gastroparesis_508.pdf Accessed 03Nov2015.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-Item Short-Form health survey: construction of scales and 
preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care. 1996;34:220-233.

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
73
12.
Appendices

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
74
12.1.
Appendix 1: Abbreviations
ACTH
adrenocorticotropic hormone
ADA
anti-drug antibodies
AE
adverse event
AESI
adverse event of special interest
ALT
alanine aminotransferase
AST 
aspartate aminotransferase
BID
twice daily
BMI 
body mass index
BP
blood pressure
CDER
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
CFB
change from baseline
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
CIOMS
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences
CONSORT
Consolidated Standards of Reporting
CSR
clinical study report
DFU
directions for use
DG
diabetic gastroparesis
DGSSD
Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary
DGSSS
Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score
DILI
drug-induced liver injury
DSMB
Data and Safety Monitoring Board
ECG
electrocardiogram

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
75
eCRF
electronic case report form
eGFR
estimated glomerular filtration rate
ET
early termination
EU
European Union
FBG
fasting blood glucose
FDA
US Food and Drug Administration
FSH
follicle stimulating hormone
GCP
Good Clinical Practice
GE
gastric emptying
GEBT
gastric emptying breath test
GERD
gastroesophageal reflux disease
GHS1α
Growth Hormone Secretagogue 1 α
GH
growth hormone
GI
gastrointestinal
GLP-1
glucagon-like peptide-1
GP
gastroparesis
HbA1c
glycosylated hemoglobin A1c
HEOR
health economic outcomes research
HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
HR
heart rate
HRT
hormonal replacement therapy
ICF
informed consent form
ICH
International Council on Harmonisation

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
76
IEC
Independent Ethics Committee
IGF-1
insulin-like growth factor-1
IND
Investigational New Drug Application
INR
international normalized ratio
IRB
Institutional Review Board
IWRS
interactive web response system
MACE
major adverse cardiovascular events
MI
multiple imputations
MMRM
mixed method for repeated measures
MNAR
missing not at random
MSP
medical safety physician
NRS
numerical rating scale
PK
pharmacokinetic
PRO
patient-reported outcome
QTcB
QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Bazett formula
QTcF
QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia formula
RLM
relamorelin
SAE
serious adverse event
SAP
statistical analysis plan

Protocol RLM-MD-02, Amendment 3
Relamorelin
77
SC
subcutaneous(ly)
SF-12v2
12-item Short Form Survey (version 2)
SGLT-1
sodium-glucose co-transporter-1
SGLT-2
sodium-glucose co-transporter-2
SMBG
self-monitoring of blood glucose
SoA
Schedule of Activities
SUSAR
suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction
T1DM
type 1 diabetes mellitus
T2DM
type 2 diabetes mellitus
UDS
urine drug screen
ULN
upper limits of normal
US
United States of America
WOCBP
women of childbearing potential

Electronic Signatures
User
Date
Justification