Safety and Tolerability of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Combined With Chemoradiation in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (Unity)
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Glioblastoma, Cancer of Brain, Glioblastoma Multiforme, Brain Tumor
Sponsor: Providence Health & Services

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 1 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Safety and tolerability of tumor treating fields (TTFields) combined with 
chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (UNITY) 
 
Protocol number: 
UNITYGBM01 
Phase: 
I 
Investigators: 
Ricky Chen, MD (PI) 
Nicholas Butowski, MD 
Steve Braunstein, MD 
Manju Sharma, PhD 
Eric Hansen, MD 
Protocol version: 
4.0 
Release date: 
19MAY2020 
 
Revision history:  
Version 
Number Version Date 
List of Changes 
1.0 
25SEP2017 
N/A 
2.0 
30JAN2018 
Given that some patients likely will not have their MGMT result by the 
time of enrollment into the study, MGMT status will not be a cause for 
exclusion.  MGMT results will be used for stratification only.   
 
In addition to the first safety lead in cohort, an additional safety stop will 
be incorporated when half of the study (15 patients) have completed 
trimodal therapy with TTF, temozolomide, and radiation phase, with 
another interim analysis before proceeding to the complete enrollment 
of 30 patients. 
 
Revised eligibility criteria to patients 22 years of age or older to match 
Optune indications (as opposed to age 18 and above). 
 
Removed from eligibility: Neurologically stable for at least 14 days prior 
to first use of TTField therapy. This is vague and already represented by 
performance status.  As long as a potential subject has KPS 70 or greater, 
they are able to participate. 
 
Added consistency: Patients with other significant cancer within the 
prior 3 years are excluded. 
 
Clarified compliance requirement: 
Patients who are using the TTField treatment less than 75% of the 
minimum recommended usage of 18 hours a day on average as assessed 
monthly (13 hours a day or less) unless per officially instituted dose 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 2 of 64 
Confidential 
 
reduction may be discontinued from therapy at the discretion of the 
investigator or sponsor. 
 
Changed schema to show RT dose remodeling BEFORE enrollment and 
now includes the 2 safety lead-ins. 
 
RT should be started within 2 weeks of starting TTF therapy (to give 
more flexibility to logistics of starting RT). 
 
Corrected inconsistency with steroid dosing requirements: Patients can 
be on high dose steroids after surgery but must have tapered down to 
8mg or less of dexamethasone or bioequivalent within 7 days after 
enrollment. 
 
During the study, patients can be discontinued from study therapy at the 
discretion of the investigator, if they are requiring more than 8mg daily 
of dexamethasone (or bioequivalent dose) for 7 consecutive days at any 
given time. 
 
Dosimetry start date: March 1st, 2018. 
 
Screening start Date April 15th, 2018. 
 
PJP prophylaxis will be a recommendation only, and each site may opt to 
follow their institution protocols. 
 
Added clause to allow for initiation of TMZ up to 7 days after start of RT 
to not count as deviation. 
 
Corrected – Neuro exams at week 3 and 6 will be done alongside weekly 
skin exams during RT phase. 
 
Clarified use of novocure device support specialist. This is not a study 
procedure per se, but is standard practice for all patients on TTField 
therapy to have access to a device support specialist to troubleshoot use 
of the device and extract compliance data from the device. 
 
Given that the safety and tolerability of adjuvant therapy with ttfields 
combined with temozolomide was reported in EF-14, this will not be 
reproduced here.  DLT and TRAEs will be monitored and analyzed in the 
window of greatest concern from start of trimodal therapy to 8 weeks 
after completion.  The use of adjuvant TTFields with temozolomide after 
that will proceed as per the standard of care.  Secondary endpoints 
(imaging response, PFS at 6 months, median OS overall and at 2 years 
and duration and compliance of TTF use) will continue to be monitored 
beyond the trimodal therapy phase.  
Added statement that transducer arrays must be off the skin during 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 3 of 64 
Confidential 
 
weekly skin checks in trimodal therapy to make the logistics explicitly 
clear.   
2.1 
31JAN2018 
Updates to Day 1 of Cycle 2 to allow for final toxicity monitoring 8 weeks 
after trimodal therapy phase.  
 
Statistical considerations updated to remove redundancies and address 
intention-to-treat analyses.  
2.2 
23MAY2018 
Corrected DLT review of 15 subjects to read second review instead of 
initial review.  
 
Added language to allow for continued enrollment in trial if study 
treatment is withdrawn for observational purposes to perform the 
intention-to-treat analysis.  
 
Corrected inclusion #13A to 3-4 weeks (21 to 28 days) for resection, 2-4 
weeks (14-28 days) for biopsy. Also corrected this in the pre-treatment 
period text. 
 
Corrected inclusion #13B to include timing of RT start from biopsy date.  
 
Added HIV+ to exclusion #2. 
 
Clarified that both MGMT and IDH to be reviewed at each subsequent 
visit post screening until resulted.  
 
Removed text from study enrollment visit and treatment period that 
stated all study related treatments must be initiated no later than 14 
days after the Day 1 clinic visit. This could be 21 days after Day 1 if all 
treatments started on the last day of each window in the sequence of 
initiating trimodal therapy section.  
 
Removed disease assessment/extent of measurable disease from Day 1 
of trimodal therapy due to lack of MRI at this time point.  
 
Clarifying text added that adjuvant therapy phase falls 4 weeks after the 
completion of radiation therapy.  
 
Updated text to read “criteria for removal of study therapy” from 
“withdrawal from therapy” to reference correct protocol section title.  
 
Clarified that disease assessment/extent of measurable disease and 
objective response assessments at Day 1 of Cycle 2 will be based on MRI 
completed at Day 1 Cycle 1 due to absence of MRI at Day 1 Cycle 2, as 
this is the last visit of the Study Period.   
 
Added clarifying text that disease assessment/extent of measurable 
disease with clinical response or deterioration and objective response 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 4 of 64 
Confidential 
 
assessments to be completed during the Long-Term Follow-up Period 
only when an MRI was completed since last review/contact.  
 
Removed ORR assessment from Long-Term Follow-up Period since this 
will be calculated during data analysis, not collected per patient.  
 
Added text to dose modifications during TTField therapy to clarify when 
to up-titrate due to non-hematologic toxicity events and allow for 
investigator discretion.  
 
Appendix 3 updated to reflect above noted changes.  
3.0 
28AUG2018 
The following revisions were made per FDA recommendations: 
 
Study Objectives: the secondary objective have been revised. 
 
Study Design: Exploratory analysis of radiation dosimetry has been 
clarified to occur prior to any patient enrollment 
 
Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion criterion #9 has been revised to limit 
consenting permissions to the patient.  
Exclusion criterion #16 has been added to prohibit patients allergic or 
unable to have gadolinium contrast dye with MRI.  
Exclusion criterion #17has been added to prohibit patients with 
aneurysm clips or implanted metal objects in the brain.   
Exclusion criterion #18 has been added to prohibit patients with 
significant skin breakdown. 
 
Clinical Trial Related Procedures; Treatment Modalities: Training of the 
patient on the use of Transducer Array Layout map, and the placement 
of arrays has been added.  
 
Dose Modifications: Guidance on skin toxicity has been updated. 
Radiation Therapy without interruptions: text has been updated per 
updated skin toxicity guidance. 
 
3.1 
10SEP2018 
The following revisions were made to incorporate the clarifications from 
the Protocol Clarification Letter (PCL) dated 06JUN2018 that 
accompanied protocol version 2.2. These edits did not make it into the 
3.0 version of the protocol inadvertently: 
 
Removal of PI, Ricky Chen, MD, as the Data Safety Monitoring 
Committee Chair. Chair responsibility will be shared by the three 
committee members.  
 
Clarification that the PI and study manager will facilitate the DSMC 
meetings as non-members.  
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 5 of 64 
Confidential 
 
The lead-in phase report will be reviewed by all of the DSMC members 
due to the removal of the Chair.  
 
Death events will be reported to the PI, Ricky Chen, MD, or designee, 
Regulatory Manager, Mark Schuster, due to the removal of the DSMC 
Chair.  
Death due to disease progression need not be reported to the PI or 
designee, not the study monitor, as the study monitor is not the 
designee.  
The following additional edits were made: 
 
Corrected Data Safety Monitoring Board to Data Safety Monitoring 
Committee for consistency throughout protocol.  
 
Removed INC#8, as EXC#10 describes a different steroid taper timeframe 
that is more appropriate as eligibility criteria. INC#8 described 
discontinuation criteria.  
 
Removed INC#13B, as this describes timing of events after enrollment, 
so not true eligibility criteria. Timing of surgery or biopsy to enrollment 
and initiation of TTField, RT, and TMZ after enrollment already 
described.   
 
INC#13A changed to INC#13 (A and B no longer necessary).  
4.0 
19MAY2020 
Added co-investigator from UCSF who replaced a prior co-investigator 
who was removed.   
 
Clarified that biopsy may be done alone without resection of GBM.  
 
Added that a post-procedure cranial CT may be used instead of an MRI if 
biopsy completed alone without resection if there was a MRI within 14 
days pre-biopsy. This is more in line with potential imaging used as part 
of standard care. Removed window that this imaging must be done 
within 72 hours, as this is not realistic per standard care. This language 
also reflected in the updates made to INC#11.  
 
INC#8 changed to allow for a legally authorized representative.  
 
INC#12 window changed for surgery from 3-4 weeks to 3-6 weeks (21-28 
days to 21 to 42 days). This is more in line with standard care.  
 
EXC#2 updated to include active Hepatitis B and active Hepatitis C, and 
clarified that these illnesses noted in criteria are by history only (not 
testing for them during trial, removed Hepatitis B labs from screening 
procedures).  
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 6 of 64 
Confidential 
 
EXC#5 updated to add the language regarding prior cancer history 
exceptions that were previously noted in EXC#13 (now #14), as this is the 
more appropriate criteria to list these items. Removed from EXC#14.  
 
EXC#10 updated to clarify timeframe is calculated off of Day 1.  
 
Removed “baseline” throughout text, as this was confusing when this 
occurred.  
 
Moved third bullet from EXC#11 to a new criteria (new EXC#12), as non-
hematological toxicity did not fit in lab abnormalities criteria.  
 
EXC#14 (prior #13) updated to clarify that significance and stability are 
per investigator discretion.  
 
EXC#16 (prior #15) updated since legally authorized representative now 
allowed. Added text that patient must be willing and able to complete 
study procedures, per investigator discretion.  
 
INC#19 (prior #18) updated to clarify that the significant skin breakdown 
is being monitored on the scalp.  
 
Added INC#20 to clarify that patients need to be able to receive 
standard care radiation therapy and can only receive hypofractioned 
radiation due to age and poor performance status, per investigator 
discretion.  
 
Updated anticipated start dates, as there were contract delays that 
delayed being able to start dosemetric testing and analysis and site 
activations.  
Reworded the screening window period for clarity, window is 
unchanged.  
 
Added typical turnaround time for treatment planning from Novocure (5 
business days) to screening for clarity.  
 
Clarified that radiation oncology initial clinical visit and planning for 
therapy must be scheduled during the screening period, if not already 
completed at the time of screening. Scheduling required only during this 
time period, may occur post Day 1.  
 
Clarified that Day 1 the clinic visit, not necessarily the day TTField is 
started. Day 1 is when enrollment occurs.  
 
Rearranged order of treatments (TTField therapy, RT, TMZ) language 
from the Study Enrollment section to the Treatment Period section, as 
this is less confusing this way and does not need to be repeated twice in 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 7 of 64 
Confidential 
 
the protocol.  
 
Added language to the Treatment Modalities section and Clinical Trial-
Related Procedures section specifying that the transducer arrays will 
need to be replaced at study visits that require them to be removed to 
complete a protocol required procedure (MRIs and skin exams at 
specified visits).  
 
Added language to the Treatment Period section that was present in the 
treatment modalities section for consistency.  
 
Added a diagram depicting the sequence of starting trimodal therapy for 
added clarity.  
 
Added that the procedures listed in the Trimodal Therapy, Day 1 section 
are to be completed before initiating TTField. Added text so order of 
events is clear.  
 
CBC and chemistry labs at Day 1 do not need to be repeated if these 
screening labs were collected within 14 days of Day 1. This eliminates 
the need for duplicate testing when there is not anticipated to be a 
significant change in that short of a timeframe.  
 
Removed phosphorus from the chemistry labs, as this is not a standard 
part of the site’s chemistry panel and needs to be ordered separately. 
This is not ordered for standard care, so removed.  
 
Removed details of toxicity from TTField from skin exam at Day 1, as 
therapy will not have been initiated and this is not an applicable 
assessment at this time point.  
 
Clarified that the device support specialist may visit the patient in the 
clinic, not just at their home.  
 
Removed text from Day 8 that was redundant regarding when to start 
RT/TMZ and regarding offsetting calendar procedures, as this was not 
accurate considering there are windows for when to start study 
treatment.  
 
Removed language regarding PJP prophylaxis from the Day 8 visit and 
moved it to the treatment modalities TMZ section. This is a more 
appropriate section, as it is a recommendation and not required at a 
specific study visit.  
 
Added a +7 day window for continuing RT and TMZ past day 49, as 
clinically appropriate. This follows standard treatment.  
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 8 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Clarified that the TTField compliance assessment is to be completed 
monthly and may not be available at each visit for review.  
 
Edit made that radiation therapy must be given within 4-6 weeks of 
resection or 2-4 weeks of biopsy. Added a window to each time point. 
 
Added an unscheduled visit to allow the investigator to bring patients in 
in case of a safety concern or the need for an additional exam.  
 
Added an early termination phone visit to in order to collect final 
adverse event, concomitant medication, and TTF compliance data. 
 
Updated Section 7a reference in the Evaluation of Safety section to the 
correct section header title.  
 
Updated contacts for serious and unexpected AE reporting, as the 
Regional Research Regulatory Office manager has changed, and the 
study manager also tracks these reports.  
 
Removed text stating protocol version number and effective date would 
be added to amendment after IRB review, as this is inaccurate. These 
items are added pre-review.  
 
Appendix 2 language updated to be reflective of the standard of care 
counseling for adequate birth control methods for the treatments being 
used in the study. Also rearranged text to list all of the methods in one 
section instead of being embedded across the text and list. Changed 
requirement to qualify as post-menopausal to natural spontaneous 
amenorrhea for ≥1 year only.  
 
Appendix 3 updated to reflect changes noted in main text.  
 
CTCAE updated to version 5.0 from 4.03.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 9 of 64 
Confidential 
 
 
Principal Investigator:   Ricky Chen, MD 
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center 
Providence Brain & Spine Institute, Neuro-Oncology 
9135 SW Barnes Road, Suite 461 
Portland, OR 97225 
ricky.chen2@providence.org 
 
Co-Investigators:   
Nicholas Butowski, MD 
 
 
 
 
University of California, San Francisco 
Department of Neurological Surgery 
505 Parnassus Ave. Rm. M779 
San Francisco, CA 94143-0112 
nicholas.butowski@ucsf.edu  
 
Steven Braunstein, MD, PhD 
University of California, San Francisco 
Department of Radiation Oncology 
505 Parnassus Ave, Long 
San Francisco, CA 94117 
steven.braunstein@ucsf.edu 
 
Manju Sharma, PhD, DABR 
University of California, San Francisco 
Department of Radiation Oncology  
1825 4th Street, M2260 
San Francisco, CA 94158 
manju.sharma@ucsf.edu 
 
Eric Hansen, MD 
Providence St Vincent Medical Center 
Radiation Oncology 
9205 SW Barnes Rd.  
Portland, OR 97225 
eric.hansen@providence.org 
 
Study Sites: 
 
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, Oregon. (Coordinating Center) 
University of California, San Francisco. 
 
Sponsor:  
 
Providence Health & Services 
 
Funding Support: 
Novocure 
 
Study Product:  
Optune™ 
 
IDE Number: 
 
G180178 
 
 
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 10 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Table of Contents 
List of abbreviations .................................................................................................................................... 11 
1. 
OVERALL SYNOPSIS OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL ....................................................................................... 12 
2. 
IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE ............................................ 14 
3. 
SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL ............................... 17 
4. 
RISKS AND BENEFITS OF THE INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE AND CLINICAL TRIAL ......................................  
5. 
OBJECTIVES OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL ................................................................................................. 222 
6. 
DESIGN OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL .......................................................................................................... 23 
5.  SUBJECT ASSESSMENTS FOR SAFETY AND EFFICACY .......................................................................... 46 
8. 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................................... 54 
9. 
AMENDMENTS TO THE CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL ........................................................................... 55 
10.   DEVICE ACCOUNTABILITY .................................................................................................................... 56 
11.   BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................... 56 
12.   SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................................ 59 
13.   APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................ 60 
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 11 of 64 
Confidential 
 
List of abbreviations  
A-172: Human Glioma Cell Line 
CRF: Case Report Form 
DSS: Device Support Specialist 
ERP: Enterprise Resource Planning system 
FDA: Food and Drug Administration 
GBM: Glioblastoma 
HR: Hazard Ratio 
IR: Irradiation 
IRB: Institutional Review Board 
ITT: Intent To Treat  
kHz: Kilo Herz 
LN-18: Human Glioma Cell Line 
LN-229: Human Glioma Cell Line 
mA: mili Amper  
NSCLC: Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer 
ORR: Objective Response Rate 
OS: Overall Survival 
PFS: Progression Free Survival 
PR: Partial Response 
RMS: Root Mean Square 
SD: Stable Disease 
TTFields: Tumor Treating Fields 
TMZ: Temozolomide 
U-87 MG: Human Glioma Cell Line 
U-118 MG: Human Glioma Cell Line 
V/cm: Volt/centimeter 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 12 of 64 
Confidential 
 
1. OVERALL SYNOPSIS OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL 
Title: 
Safety and tolerability of tumor treating fields (TTFields) combined with 
chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (UNITY) 
Device: 
Optune™ (200kHz output frequency) 
Study Objectives: 
Primary Objective:  
The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability of using 
TTFields concurrent with standard fractionated radiotherapy and 
temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy followed by adjuvant therapy.  
Secondary Objective:  
The secondary objective is to report clinical outcomes (overall survival, 
progression free survival, imaging response, and duration and compliance 
of TTF use) after the tri-modal therapy. 
Exploratory Objectives: 
1. To explore dosimetric influences of radiation delivery on dose 
distribution with TTFields arrays as a representation of normal 
treatment conditions. 
2. To explore the feasibility of producing a high-quality mask for 
radiation planning with TTFields arrays in position. 
3. To explore the source of skin toxicity. 
Study Design: 
The study is an open-label pilot study in newly diagnosed GBM patients 
following surgery.  Patients (≥22 years) with histologically confirmed GBM 
in the supratentorial region and a KPS ≥70% are eligible to participate. 
Patients must have had MGMT testing performed locally for stratification 
purposes to participate, but specific MGMT result (positive, negative, or 
indeterminate) shall not be a cause for exclusion.  Eligible patients will be 
receiving treatment with TTFields starting about 1 week prior to radiation.  
In addition to TTFields, they will receive radiation and temozolomide at a 
dose and schedule conforming to the standard of care.  The expected 
toxicity is skin related and patients will be followed closely for weekly skin 
and neurological examination during the DLT window throughout 
radiation therapy and then for 8 weeks afterwards to capture any delayed 
toxicity as they begin adjuvant therapy per the standard of care.  As long 
as tolerated and their conditions remain stable, patients shall continue the 
experimental therapy up to 24 months per the standard of care.   
 
The study incorporates three stages of recruitment to confirm the safety 
of combining TTFields therapy with concurrent chemoradiation: a safety 
lead-in cohort of the first 6 patients enrolled, a second safety lead-in 
cohort of the first 15 patients enrolled (half of the total enrollment), and 
an expansion cohort with 15 additional patients. For the lead-in cohorts, a 
safety interim analysis will be performed 4 weeks after radiation of the 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 13 of 64 
Confidential 
 
last patient and will need to pass a pre-specified stopping rule before the 
next stage of recruitment can begin. Safety within the DLT window and 
efficacy analyses will be performed on all subjects at the end of the study. 
An exploratory analysis of radiation dosimetry will be performed by 
phantom modeling incorporating the TTFields electrode arrays prior to any 
patients being enrolled. 
Study Hypothesis: 
TTFields has been shown to be safe and efficacious in large trials with 
glioblastoma patients in combination with adjuvant temozolomide but 
concurrent use together with trimodal therapy has not been examined in 
clinical trials.  Our primary hypothesis is that the TTFields treatment, if 
initiated concurrently along with radiation and temozolomide therapy, 
would not significantly alter the safety profile.  Secondarily, continuation of 
early initiated TTF along with adjuvant temozolomide treatment as per the 
standard of care would increase progression and overall survival. The 
primary hypothesis is safety and will be tested directly in this trial, but the 
secondary hypothesis would be assessed only with preliminary 
observations and need validation in a larger trial that is statistically powered 
for that investigation.  
Sample Size: 
30 patients total, 6 included in the first safety lead-in and 15 in the second 
safety lead-in. 
Study Population: 
Patients with newly diagnosed histologically confirmed glioblastoma after 
maximally safe resection, with MGMT methylation status in process, are 
eligible for enrollment. 
Primary Endpoint: 
The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability of the combined use of 
TTFields added to standard chemoradiation and TMZ. 
Secondary 
Endpoints: 
Our secondary endpoints will be progression-free and overall survival, 
imaging response by RANO criteria, and duration and compliance of TTF 
use. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 14 of 64 
Confidential 
 
 
2. IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE 
a) Description of the Investigational Device and its Intended Purpose 
Optune™ is intended as a treatment for adult patients (22 years of age or older) with 
histologically-confirmed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). 
Optune™ with temozolomide is indicated for treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed, 
supratentorial glioblastoma following maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiation 
therapy together with concomitant standard of care chemotherapy. 
For the treatment of recurrent GBM, Optune™ is indicated following histologically or 
radiologically-confirmed recurrence in the supratentorial region of the brain after receiving 
chemotherapy. The device is intended to be used as a monotherapy, and is intended as an 
alternative standard medical therapy for GBM after surgical and radiation options have been 
exhausted. 
Under this clinical trial, Optune™ is also intended to be used for the treatment of newly 
diagnosed glioblastoma following maximal debulking surgery, however, the treatment will be 
initiated concurrent with (not after completion of) radiation therapy along with temozolomide.  
The device is a portable, battery operated system which delivers TTFields to the patient by 
means of insulated Transducer Arrays (INE transducer arrays). Optune™ produces electric 
forces intended to disrupt cancer cell division. 
b) Details Concerning the Manufacturer of the Investigational Device 
The Optune™ System is manufactured by Novocure Ltd., Topaz Building, MATAM center, Haifa 
31905, Israel.  Novocure Ltd. is an EN ISO 13485 approved and 21CFR820 compliant medical 
device company developing electric field based therapy for cancer patients.  Novocure's 
headquarters are located in Israel. Novocure GmbH is the EN ISO 13485 approved and 
21CFR820 compliant Novocure Ltd global distribution center. Novocure GmbH is based in 
Switzerland. 
 
c) System Parts and Their Identification 
The Optune™ System is composed of several parts, which are shown in the picture below. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 15 of 64 
Confidential 
 
 
1 Power supply 
2 Charger 
3 Insulated transducer arrays 
4 Device carrying bag 
 
5 Optune™ electric field generator (the 
device) 
6 Portable battery 
7 Connection cable & box 
d) Traceability  
All parts of the Optune™ System are identified by a unique and personal serial number. 
Transducer arrays are identified by lot number. Novocure maintains traceability of all parts 
through paper documentation and SAP ERP:  
 
Steps 
Traceability ensured by 
Manufacturing 
EN ISO 13485 Vendor Quality System 
Receiving 
SOP-USOC-002 Incoming Inspection and SAP 
ERP 
Storage 
SOP-USOC-004 Stockroom and SAP ERP 
Shipping 
SOP-USOC-003 Shipping- Final release and SAP 
ERP 
Use 
SAP ERP 
 
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 16 of 64 
Confidential 
 
e) Intended Purpose of the Investigational Device in the Proposed Clinical Trial 
The Optune™ System is intended for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma following 
maximal debulking surgery concurrent with chemoradiation therapy.  
 
f) Materials That Will Be in Contact with Tissues  
The INE transducer arrays are applied directly to the skin.  
 
These arrays are sterile single use devices and incorporate the following: 
 
Part name 
Functions 
1 
Cover tape 
Provides adhesion of the array to patients’ skin 
2 
INE transducer array 
The array delivers the treatment to the patient 
and measures the temperature 
3 
Conductive gel layers and ceramic 
discs (beneath) 
Gel: Ensures electric contact between the 
transducer array and the skin  
Ceramic disc: Used for the TTFields transmission 
4 
Mid-pads 
Mechanically stabilizes the gel over the array 
5 
Overlapping liner 
Covers the gel and the cover tape 
6 
Applied part cable with black 
connector or white connector 
Connects the transducer array to the 
connection box  
 
g) Training Procedures Involved in the Use of the Investigational Device 
The Optune™ System is easy to use and a simple training by the Device Support Specialist (DSS) 
is sufficient for patients and the study team to apply the investigational device according to its 
intended use. No specific medical/surgical procedures are needed for the use of the 
investigational device.  
 
 
6 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 17 of 64 
Confidential 
 
3. SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE CLINICAL 
TRIAL 
a) Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) 
GBM, a malignant form of astrocytoma, is the most common of all malignant primary brain and 
CNS tumors. The incidence rate of GBM is 3.2 per 100,000 population. Incidence increases 
steadily above 45 years of age with 12,120 cases predicted in 2016 in the US.  GBM is the most 
lethal brain tumor. Despite numerous attempts to improve the outcome of patients with GBM, 
only one-third of patients survive for one year and the 5-year survival rate is only 5.1 %1. 
Before the introduction of TTFields, treatment of newly diagnosed GBM was based on surgical 
resection with or without Gliadel Wafer implantation, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. 
Patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were treated with maximal surgical resection, 60 Gy 
radiotherapy together with temozolomide, followed by maintenance temozolomide for 6 
months, had a median survival of 14.6 months2. 
 
Each of these treatments is briefly described below: 
1. Surgical resection - Treatment of patients with GBM usually begins with resection or 
biopsy, with maximal safe debulking of the tumor as the main goal because curative 
resection is exceedingly rare.  
2. Radiation therapy - Post-surgical radiation therapy has been shown to improve survival, 
though even with maximal treatment, survival after RT alone is still limited to about one 
year2.  
3. Temozolomide – Adjuvant temozolomide and radiation therapy following surgery has been 
shown to improve survival by about 20%. According to the temozolomide package insert 
adjuvant temozolomide treatment delays disease progression (from 5 to 6.9 months) and 
improves overall survival (from 12.1 to 14.6 months)2. 
 
Unfortunately, nearly all glioblastoma cases recur. At recurrence the management depends on 
the extent of the disease and patient’s performance status. Treatment options include re-
resection with or without wafer placement in the surgical bed, systemic chemotherapy, re-
irradiation and TTFields. 
 
b) Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Overview 
TTFields are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality with which has been 
approved for the treatment of recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM by the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) in the United States. The instructions for use of Optune™ can be found at: 
https://www.optune.com/Content/pdfs/Optune_IFU_8.5x11.pdf 
 
TTFields act by delivering low intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate frequency (100-300 kHz) 
alternating electric fields to the tumor using non-invasive transducer arrays placed on the skin 
around the region of the body containing the tumor. TTFields act during mitosis by disrupting 
the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase, by impeding the normal midline 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 18 of 64 
Confidential 
 
localization of septin complex in cells which have entered anaphase, inducing violent 
cytoplasmic blebbing and mitotic failure, and by dielectrophoretic dislocation of intracellular 
constituents during cytokinesis, resulting in apoptosis3–7. The efficacy of TTFields is frequency 
dependent on specific cell types. The anti-mitotic effect of TTFields has been shown in multiple 
cell lines when the appropriate frequency was utilized. This includes but not limited to the 
following tumor models: glioblastoma at 200 kHz7, NSCLC at 150kHz8; breast carcinoma at 
120kHz9; melanoma at 100kHz10).  
 
The effect of TTFields is directional, i.e., TTFields are most effective when applied in the 
direction of the division axis of the dividing cell3,7. In order to increase the efficacy of TTFields, 
two sequential field directions can be applied to tumors by using two perpendicular pairs of 
transducer arrays.   
 
c) Preclinical Results with TTFields 
 
TTFields and Radiation Therapy 
TTFields have demonstrated significant activity in in vitro and in vivo glioma preclinical models 
both as a single modality treatment and in combination with irradiation. Radiation therapy (RT) 
has significantly greater efficacy when combined with TTFields according to an evaluation that 
compared the surviving fraction of U-87 MG and U-118 MG cultures glioma cell cultures11. The 
combination therapy was found to be most effective when TTFields were applied immediately 
after exposure to RT. Aberrant DNA damage repair and extended retention of γH2AX and Rad51 
nuclear foci in cells 24 hours after exposure to both modalities. Combining TTFields treatment 
and IR led to a further decrease in the surviving fraction for all tested radiation doses in both 
cell lines. Additionally, TTFields delayed DNA damage repair following irradiation induced 
damage11, 19, 20. This was achieved through inhibition of double stand DNA damage repair by 
homologous recombination.  
 
Investigations using an ion chamber connected to a unidos dosemeter demonstrated that the 
TTFields transducer arrays absorb only a small fraction of the irradiation energy, but lead to a 
dramatic increase in the energy directly below the ceramic arrays that could potentially abolish 
the "skin sparing" effect12. Further experiments showed that no additional skin adverse events 
were observed when single irradiation dose of 10 Gy was applied to the rat head through the 
transducers. Skin screening revealed that irradiation through the ceramic arrays did not lead to 
adverse skin reactions when rats were irradiated with 2 Gy, five times a week for two weeks 
through ceramic arrays placed on the rat’s dorsal skin. 
 
Effects of the tumor suppressor gene p53 on TTFields  
The surviving fractions of glioma cell lines expressing either wild-type p53 (A-172 and U-87 MG) 
or mutant p53 (U-118 MG and F-98 rat glioma) demonstrated that the application of TTFields 
led to a significant reduction in cell count and clonogenic potential as compared to untreated 
cells in both p53 wt and p53 mutant cell lines13. Analysis of Annexin V and Propidium Iodide 
expression revealed that TTFields-induced apoptosis is independent of p53 status. Caspase 
activity was increased in wt p53 cells following TTFields application, however no increase was 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 19 of 64 
Confidential 
 
observed in mutant p53 cells. This demonstrates that TTFields exposure induces apoptosis by 
both p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways. 
 
TTFields effects on cell migration 
Application of TTFields in-vitro led to a significant reduction in both migratory and invasive 
phenotype in multiple glioma cell lines14. Specifically, cell migration velocity, as assessed by the 
wound healing assay, was significantly reduced in U-87 MG (31%, P<0.001), and in A-172 (27%, 
P<0.001) compared with untreated control cells. The number of invading cells, as assessed by 
the modified Boyden chamber assay, was reduced in U-87 MG (54%, P<0.05), A-172 (68%, 
P<0.05), LN-229 (38%, P<0.01) and in LN-18 (55%, P<0.05) compared with untreated control 
cells. These results suggest that human glioma cell motility is impaired by exposure to TTFields.  
 
d) Clinical Results with Optune™ in Glioblastoma 
Based on promising pilot data in both recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma, a phase III 
trial was conducted in the United States and Europe to test the safety and efficacy of 200 kHz 
TTFields alone versus active chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma15.  The 
primary endpoint was overall survival. Patients (median age 54 years (range 23-80), Karnofsky 
performance status 80% (range 50-100)) were randomized to 200 kHz TTFields alone (n=120) or 
active chemotherapy control (n=117).  The treatment of control arm was based on physician-
selected active chemotherapy that predominantly included bevacizumab based regimens, 
irinotecan or nitrosurea.  The median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1-6).  
Median overall survival was 6.6 vs. 6.0 months (hazard ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.66-1.12]; p=0.27), 1-
year survival rate was 20% and 20% and progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 21.4% 
and 15.1% (p=0.13), respectively in TTFields versus chemotherapy treated patients. Responses 
were more frequent in the TTFields arm (14% vs. 9.6%, p=0.19). The most common TTFields-
related adverse event was mild (14%) to moderate (2%) skin irritation beneath the transducer 
arrays, which was again expected with use of the transducer arrays. These adverse events were 
effectively treated with topical hydrocortisone.  Patients receiving chemotherapy had 
significantly more gastrointestinal, hematological and infectious complications. Quality of life 
analyses favored TTFields in most domains. Specifically, cognitive and emotional function were 
reported to be much better in the TTFields treated patients than with chemotherapy.  
The results of this phase III trial demonstrated comparable efficacy with this chemotherapy-free 
treatment (200 kHz TTFields) to chemotherapy (including bevacizumab) in recurrent 
glioblastoma with a more favorable safety profile and quality of life and supported FDA 
approval of TTFields in recurrent glioblastoma in 2011 and a CE mark in Europe. 
 
Registry data from 457 recurrent GBM patients who started Optune™ prescribed by the 
treating physician in the US between October 2011 and November 2013 showed an even higher 
median overall survival of 9.6 months, with baseline characteristics similar to those of patients 
treated under the pivotal clinical trial17. The 2-year survival rate in this population was 30% 
(compared to 9% in Optune™-treated patients on the clinical trial). Compliance was a clear 
predictor of survival on Optune™, and patients treated with the device for at least 18 hours per 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 20 of 64 
Confidential 
 
day had significantly longer survival time. No new safety signals have been detected in this 
registry dataset and the only common adverse event related to Optune™ was dermatitis.  
Based on this clinical data in recurrent GBM and a pilot trial in newly diagnosed GBM with 
Optune™ in combination with temozolomide that demonstrated favorable safety profile and 
promising efficacy, an international phase III trial in newly diagnosed GBM, evaluating the role 
of Optune™ in combination with temozolomide maintenance after surgery and chemoradiation 
versus temozolomide alone was conducted14.  An interim analysis included 210 patients 
randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide and 105 randomized to temozolomide alone, and 
was conducted at a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 18-60 months). Median 
progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2 
months) in the Optune™ plus temozolomide group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2 months) in 
the temozolomide alone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89]; P = .001). Median 
overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0 months) in 
the Optune™ plus temozolomide group (n = 196) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1 months) 
in the temozolomide alone group (n = 84) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98]; P = .004). Quality of 
life and gross cognitive function were also comparable in the 2 arms18. 
 
Based on the data submitted to FDA from this newly diagnosed GBM study, FDA approved 
Optune™ in combination with temozolomide for the treatment of adult patients with newly 
diagnosed GBM on October 5, 2015. In the US, Optune™ with temozolomide is indicated for the 
treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed, supratentorial glioblastoma following 
maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiation therapy together with concomitant 
standard of care chemotherapy. 
 
e) Rationale for Conducting the Clinical Trial 
Glioblastoma is the most common and deadly of the primary brain cancers in adults with a 
prevalence of 50,000 patients currently living with the disease21.  Despite aggressive treatment 
with maximal surgical resection, radiotherapy and temozolomide, overall survival for most 
patients is limited on average to 14.6 months from diagnosis22. Tumor treating fields (TTFields) 
is a novel therapy that was initially approved by the FDA for recurrent glioblastoma in place of 
standard medical therapy in 2011 based on the results of an open-label phase III trial (EF-11) 
showing comparable survival to physician’s choice chemotherapy23.  Subsequently, another 
open-label phase III trial (EF-14)24 showed a survival benefit of adding TTFields therapy to 
adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy after standard chemoradiation.  The mature data was 
presented recently25; the group that received maintenance TTFields therapy in addition to 
temozolomide had a median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of 24.5 months compared to 
19.8 months with temozolomide alone; 2-year OS rates were 42.5% and 30% respectively.  This 
effect was statistically significant and irrespective of MGMT methylation status, age, extent of 
resection, or performance status.  Investigators have demonstrated the mechanism of TTFields’ 
antineoplastic effect involving disruption of microtubule polymerization and formation of 
mitotic spindles, leading to mitotic catastrophe, aneuploidy, and subsequent cell death.26  
However, TTFields also appears to induce apoptosis via activation of multiple immunogenic 
molecular pathways.27 Given the apparent improvement in survival using this device in newly 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 21 of 64 
Confidential 
 
diagnosed patients with glioblastoma post radiation and the potential synergy with radiation in 
preclinical studies, this study aims to investigate the safety and tolerability of using the TTField 
therapy concurrent with chemoradiation. 
 
4. RISKS AND BENEFITS OF THE INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE AND CLINICAL 
TRIAL 
The risks associated with use of the Optune™ System are principally electrical or mechanical 
failure leading to electrical shock, electromagnetic interference, as well as the risk that the 
treatment will not be effective in delaying tumor progression or causing regression.  Additional 
risks include skin irritation, and skin breakdown or infection at electrode sites.  Technical failure 
is extremely unlikely due to stringent compliance with all standard design and manufacturing 
safety protocols.  In addition, appropriate measures have been taken to minimize the risk to 
study subjects, including preclinical in vitro and in vivo testing to ensure safe operation of the 
device.   
 
The use of TTFields in glioblastoma has been used safely in combination with temozolomide 
after radiation therapy in EF-14. Although mild to moderate skin irritation was common (43%), 
severe reactions were rare (2%). Other mild anxiety, confusion, headache, and insomnia were 
more frequent with the addition of TTFields to temozolomide but occurred mostly at initiation 
of therapy24.  The risk of seizures was not increased with the addition of TTFields.  Thus, 
TTFields has been shown to be safe in large trials with glioblastoma patients in combination 
with adjuvant temozolomide.  However, in EF-14, the patients did not start TTFields until after 
radiation therapy.  There have been no clinical trials to date using TTFields during radiotherapy 
with concurrent temozolomide.  In preclinical studies, glioma cells that had been treated with 
the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and TTFields exhibited a greater fraction of double 
strand breaks with aberrant DNA damage repair compared with either modality alone28.  Given 
the synergism with RT, combined treatment may increase the efficacy of TTFields therapy to 
enhance its proven survival benefit for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.   
 
There are certain technical and safety considerations if patients are to be treated with 
electrodes in place.  During TTFields therapy, patients are allowed brief periods unplugged from 
the device.  In the general course of radiation therapy, the actual delivery of radiation dose at 
each treatment visit is no more than 15 minutes.  Patients can thus turn off and unplug their 
TTFields device while undergoing radiotherapy with the electrodes remaining in place to 
prevent possible interference and damage to their device.  Studies of radiation therapy in 
patients with cardiac devices, such as pacemakers and defibrillators, have shown that we can 
expect a certain amount of electromagnetic noise created by RT delivery, that while potentially 
detrimental to circuit boards, RAM, and transistors29,30, are unlikely to produce permanent 
damage to simpler components such as wiring and electrodes.  With the array adherent to the 
scalp, one has to consider potential interference with the radiation dosimetry (See Study 
Design) and possible interference with the sculpting of a high-quality radiation mask.  Given 
that a small degree of attenuation is likely, we will perform measurements for reference.   

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 22 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Treatment-associated inflammation, edema, or necrosis is a known risk of radiation therapy 
and temozolomide, occurring in a percentage of patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma 
undergoing standard therapy, with some series reporting 14 out of 51 patients having MRI or 
pathological evidence of this phenomenon (the true incidence remains uncertain due to 
difficulties in imaging interpretation).31  This is often an asymptomatic and self-limited process 
which can be mitigated with corticosteroids.  The addition of TTFields to concurrent radiation 
and temozolomide chemotherapy has not been tested.  However, per the EF-14 trial, in which 
TTFields was started only 4 weeks after radiation and combined with adjuvant temozolomide, 
there was no significant increase in treatment associated effects.  The standard of care requires 
a post-radiation therapy MRI scan approximately 4 weeks after completing initial 
chemoradiation, included also in our study, which can identify treatment-related effects that 
can be treated with corticosteroid therapy.  If this process is excessive, requiring more than 
8mg of dexamethasone daily for 7 consecutive days or produce significant neurologic 
dysfunction, then treatment may be discontinued per investigator judgment for patient safety. 
Beyond the risks of study therapy exposure, other risks of study participation include additional 
visits and examinations, vital signs, blood draws for screening and for toxicity evaluation during 
the radiation period.  Otherwise, MRI scans and quantity of subsequent visits, radiation and 
temozolomide chemotherapy received are the same as the standard of care. 
   
Alternatives to this intervention include proceeding with the standard of care treatments and 
procedures for glioblastoma.  Although the use of TTFields in the adjuvant setting has improved 
the survival for newly diagnosed patients, the prognosis remains poor, which is the rationale for 
conducting this trial.  
 
The potential benefits of the therapy are promising. Tumor treating fields have improved 
survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma when added to temozolomide as 
maintenance therapy after standard chemoradiation.  This has led to a modest but true benefit 
in overall survival on the order of months, leading to FDA approval of the device for use in 
newly diagnosed patients.  Emerging preclinical data suggests that TTFields acts not only 
through disruption of mitotic apparatus but may lead to impairment of DNA repair and 
increased DNA double strand breaks in tumors after recent irradiation.  TTFields has been used 
concurrently with TMZ and proven to be safe and well-tolerated as a maintenance therapy after 
radiation, but has not been used in combination with TMZ during radiation.  
 
5. OBJECTIVES OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL 
Purpose and Objectives  
Purpose  
The results from the proposed study will lay a necessary foundation from which to launch a 
large phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy of tumor treating fields in synergy with 
standard chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.  If successful, this may eventually 
lead to a more meaningful enhancement of survival prolongation in this devastating cancer. 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 23 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Primary Objective 
1. To determine the safety and tolerability of using TTFields with standard fractionated 
radiotherapy and temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. 
 
Secondary Objective 
 
1. To observe clinical outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, imaging response, and 
duration and compliance of TTF use) of using TTFields and temozolomide in the upfront setting 
with concurrent radiotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with TTFields and 
temozolomide.  
 
Exploratory Objectives 
1. To explore dosimetric influences of radiation delivery on dose distribution with TTFields arrays 
as a representation of normal treatment conditions. 
2. To explore the feasibility of producing a high-quality mask for radiation planning with TTFields 
arrays in position. 
3. To explore the source of skin toxicity. 
 
6. DESIGN OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL 
 
Schema 
 
 
 
 
 
General Study Design 
This is a dual institution open-label, single arm, 3 stage, phase I trial of a medical device (TTFields) 
in newly diagnosed glioblastoma after maximal safe resection with the primary objective of 
determining safety. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 24 of 64 
Confidential 
 
 
Radiation dosimetry and mask modeling 
Prior to the start of the study, a radiation dosimetry assessment and trial mask production will 
be performed.  This serves as a preliminary safety and quality check. Using a phantom with a 
TTFields array in place on a medical linear accelerator, we will model the dosimetric impact of 
having the TTFields electrodes on the scalp at the time of RT delivery, as well as impact on the 
device operation. There may also be a small amount of scatter that may draw out dose 
superficially and cause increased skin toxicity.  However, whether this would result in increased 
graded toxicity from routine use of TTFields therapy is unclear.   
 
In the process of radiation planning, CT simulation involves production of a high-quality 
immobilization mask and acquisition of a non-contrast head CT from which to overlay the 
treatment maps for precise targeted radiation delivery.  The presence of the scalp electrodes is 
expected to have minimal impact on the production of an immobilization mask, as the position 
of the electrodes would most likely not change from day to day. The immobilization setup can 
readily accommodate patients with long and dense hair, and will be able to accommodate the 
thin electrode pads on a shaved head. We perform daily image guidance with cone-beam CT for 
setup adjustment, so we can compensate for small variations in daily patient position in the 
mask.  Finally, the presence of the electrodes may introduce image signal artifact in the 
planning CT scan. Prior to the study, we will analyze CT scans acquired on the phantom model 
for evidence of artifact and measure the signal to noise ratio and the change, if any, on 
Hounsfield units of normal tissues and structures imaged. 
 
Safety Lead-ins 
To form a reasonable basis of safety for enrolling the expansion cohort of patients, this study 
will incorporate two safety lead-ins using the first 6 patients and the first 15 patients (50% of 
the expected total number of patients) to assess the feasibility, safety and tolerability of 
combining TTFields therapy with concurrent chemoradiation (concurrent enrollment allowed).  
The safety cohorts will receive TTFields therapy in addition to standard of care. Variations in 
daily patient positioning will be recorded. Any treatment related adverse effects will be 
measured, assessed, and graded during the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) period, from the 
beginning of therapy until 8 weeks after completion of radiation therapy to capture any 
potential delayed toxicity following combination (Trimodal) therapy with radiation, 
temozolomide, and TTFields therapy. DLT include any severe or life-threatening treatment-
related adverse effects that preclude further administration of the study treatments, such as 
radiation, temozolomide, or continuation of TTFields therapy.  The DLT assessment period will 
be limited to the time from start of TTFields through 8 weeks after RT’s completion.  
 
The first lead-in cohort will include the first 6 patients to finish the DLT period and be assessed 
by investigators. If a DLT occurs in 2 or more of the 6 patients, then the study will not move 
forward and may re-consider the goal dose of TTFields therapy in the main cohort to be 
reduced by 50% (one out of every two weeks off) and only increased to the standard usage of 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 25 of 64 
Confidential 
 
continuous treatment 4 weeks after completion of radiation therapy. If a DLT occurs in less than 
two patients, the study will proceed with the second safety lead-in. 
 
The second lead-in cohort will include the first 15 patients (6 from the first lead-in and 9 
additional) to finish the DLT period and be assessed by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee 
(DSMC). If a DLT occurs in 5 or more of the 15 patients in the second safety cohort, then the 
study will not move forward with the expansion cohort and may re-consider the goal dose of 
TTFields therapy in the main cohort to be reduced by 50% (one out of every two weeks off) and 
only increased to the standard usage of continuous treatment 4 weeks after completion of 
radiation therapy. If a DLT occurs in less than five patients, the study will proceed with the final 
expansion cohort. 
 
After screening and enrollment, the expanded cohort of subjects will be treated with radiation, 
temozolomide, and TTField therapy for 6 weeks akin to the safety lead-ins.  The primary 
endpoint of treatment related adverse event (TRAE) rate and severity will be recorded and 
graded based on the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 
and DLT as defined in this protocol.  The CTCAE v5.0 criteria can be found at: 
https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_
Reference_5x7.pdf Building on the already published long term safety data of combining 
TTField therapy with adjuvant TMZ after radiation therapy, this phase I study aims to assess the 
safety and tolerability of the device when used with concurrent radiation and TMZ at the initial 
postoperative or postbiopsy setting.  Thus, the toxicity window for the primary endpoints of 
this study will start when subjects begin combined trimodal therapy (TTFields, RT, and TMZ) 
and end 8 weeks after completion of the trimodal therapy. After this time, TRAEs and DLTs are 
not monitored as part of the study endpoints because long term safety of adjuvant TTFields 
along with TMZ after radiation has been established in the preceding EF-14 trial.  After 
completion of the DLT window, we will analyze and report on the safety and tolerability of 
combining TTField therapy with radiation and temozolomide prior to adjuvant therapy.  We will 
report on those findings as well as preliminary survival trends that were observed after final 
completion of the study.  
 
During the initial trimodal therapy phase, all subjects will receive weekly skin exams along with 
repeat neurologic exams at Day 22 and Day 43 while chemoradiation is underway.  After 
completion of initial chemoradiation, they will have a 4-week hiatus from TMZ chemotherapy 
but will continue TTField therapy.  After the hiatus, an MRI will be performed and TMZ will then 
be resumed for a minimum of 6 cycles of adjuvant therapy (along with continued TTField 
therapy for up to 2 years as tolerated) with appropriate laboratory monitoring per the standard 
of care.    
 
Two weeks after trimodal therapy, patients will receive a skin exam, scalp assessment and 
neurologic exam at Day 64 and will also be monitored at 4 weeks (Day 1 of Cycle 1 of adjuvant 
TMZ) and 8 weeks (Day 1 of Cycle 2 of adjuvant TMZ) after trimodal therapy to assess for post 
treatment toxicity that may be delayed.  After conclusion of the DLT window, the treatment of 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 26 of 64 
Confidential 
 
patients will be carried out per the standard of care in addition to continued TTFields therapy, 
as outlined in the clinical trial-related procedures section.  The trial will then follow the clinical 
outcomes including duration of TTF use, completion of 6 cycles of temozolomide, and 
progression free survival at 6 months, and median overall survival and overall survival at 2 
years.  
 
Primary Study Endpoints 
• Rate of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) 
• Rate of treatment-related severe adverse events (TRSAE) 
• Rate of Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) 
 
Given that the primary objective of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of 
adding TTField therapy to combined chemoradiation, our primary endpoints are related to 
safety as follows: Identify the rate of treatment-related adverse events as well as the rate of 
any severe adverse events during the combined treatment period and up to 8 weeks 
afterwards.  For the same time frame, we will also document and assess the rate of dose-
limiting toxicities.  Safety of combined adjuvant treatment with TTFields and TMZ 
chemotherapy outside of the initial radiation is not a primary objective and will not be formally 
assessed in this study.  The above endpoints will be assessed initially in the interim safety 
analyses involving the safety lead-in cohorts and then also in the main expanded cohort for the 
final analysis.  See statistical methods for further details of the planned analysis.  For any skin 
toxicity grade II or greater, we will also investigate and document, if apparent, whether this was 
related to the adhesive vs the ceramic disc component of the device. 
 
Secondary Study Endpoints 
• PFS6 
• Overall survival (median OS and rate of OS at 2 years) 
• Objective response by modified RANO criteria 
• Median duration of TTFields use and rate of TTF compliance 
 
Secondary endpoints of this study will provide a preliminary assessment of clinical outcomes by 
estimating the PFS6 of TTField therapy plus radiation and TMZ chemotherapy followed by 
adjuvant TMZ for at least 6 cycles and continuous TTField therapy for up to 24 months.  Since 
use of TTField therapy has been deemed safe and is FDA approved in the post-radiation 
adjuvant therapy setting, treatment will be pursued using standard of care, as outlined in the 
treatment modalities section.  Median OS and rate of OS at 2 years will be analyzed for all 
subjects that start the TTField therapy along with radiation and chemotherapy.  Objective 
response to therapy will also be assessed by modified RANO criteria (see appendix).  The rate of 
TTFields compliance will be the percentage of patients who used TTFields at least 75% of the 
minimum recommended usage of 18 hours a day on average, as assessed monthly. Given the 
limitations of this small phase I study, these secondary endpoints will not be powered for 
statistical significance but will provide basic trends as a foundation for further study of efficacy 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 27 of 64 
Confidential 
 
in future phase II/III trials.  The above endpoints will be assessed for all patients in the final 
analysis. 
 
Subject Selection and Withdrawal 
The study will enroll subjects with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), following surgical 
resection of the tumor.  After informed consent is obtained, subjects will be screened for 
eligibility based on the outlined inclusion and exclusion criteria.  Prospective participants must 
have had a contrast-enhanced brain MRI post-tumor resection procedure.  If the subject had a 
biopsy alone without  resection, a cranial CT may be used instead of a MRI, provided they had a 
preoperative MRI scan within 14 days of biopsy. Screening can occur after this post-operative 
imaging is completed. 
 
If a subject stops study treatment on or before Day 1 of Cycle 2 of the Adjuvant TMZ Therapy 
Phase, they many continue in the trial for observational purposes, if willing, in order to perform 
the intention-to-treat analysis.  
 
Eligibility Criteria 
Patients with the following characteristics will be eligible in the clinical trial: 
 
Inclusion Criteria: 
1. GBM or Gliosarcoma by histology 
2. MGMT methylation status and IDH mutation status must be assessed at the study site or 
patient’s referral center.  MGMT status will be used for stratification purposes but will 
not exclude patients from this study if they are either methylated, unmethylated, or 
indeterminate, or in process at the time of enrollment.  Similarly, subjects with tumors 
that are IDH mutated or wild type are both eligible. 
3. Supratentorial location 
4. Maximum safe resection (including patients who can only safely be biopsied) 
5. 22 years of age or older 
6. Estimated survival of at least 12 weeks 
7. KPS 70% or greater at time of entry to study 
8. Patient provided written informed consent, or provided by a legally authorized 
representative  
9. Willingness to comply with all procedures, including visits or evaluations, imaging, 
laboratory tests and rescue measures 
10. Acceptable method of birth control (see appendix) 
11. Have had a contrast-enhanced brain MRI after tumor resection procedure. If biopsy 
alone performed, cranial CT may be used in place of MRI, only if the patient had a 
preoperative MRI scan within 14 days of the biopsy. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 28 of 64 
Confidential 
 
12. The following time period must have elapsed prior to study enrollment: 3-6 weeks (21-
42 days) from time of definitive surgery or 2-4 weeks (14-28 days) from the time of 
biopsy, for those who were only able to safely have a biopsy and not full resection.  
 
Exclusion Criteria: 
1. Craniotomy or stereotactic biopsy wound dehiscence or infection 
2. Known by history to be HIV positive or to have an AIDS-related illness, active Hepatitis B, 
or active Hepatitis C (testing not required) 
3. Presence of skull defects (bullets, metal fragments, missing bone) 
4. Patients with implanted electronic medical devices (including but not limited to: 
pacemaker, vagal nerve stimulator, or pain stimulator) 
5. Prior invasive malignancy, unless disease free for 3 or more years, with the exception of 
basal cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in situ, or melanoma in situ 
6. Recurrent malignant gliomas or higher grade gliomas transformed from previous low 
grade (II) glioma 
7. Patients with any current Primary brain stem or spinal cord tumor 
8. Prior use of temozolomide  
9. Prior treatment with Avastin  
10. Individuals requiring >8mg of dexamethasone per day within 7 days prior to Day 1 (high 
dose steroid taper following craniotomy with >8mg of dexamethasone is allowed during 
the screening period, but subjects must taper down to 8mg or less of dexamethasone 
(or bioequivalent) within 7 days prior to Day 1). 
11. Clinically significant lab abnormalities at screening showing bone marrow, hepatic, and 
renal dysfunction:  
o Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 x 103/μL)  
o Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1.5 x 103/μL)  
o Significant liver function impairment - AST or ALT > 3 times the upper limit of 
normal  
o Total bilirubin > upper limit of normal  
o Significant renal impairment (serum creatinine > 1.7 mg/dL)  
12. CTC grade 4 non-hematological Toxicity (except for alopecia, nausea, vomiting) at 
screening 
13. Inability to swallow pills 
14. Clinically significant or unstable comorbid medical condition, per investigator discretion 
(for example, active or uncontrolled infection requiring systemic therapy, including 
known HIV or hepatitis B or C virus)   

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 29 of 64 
Confidential 
 
15. Known current alcohol or drug abuse, per investigator discretion. Prior history of 
substance abuse is permissible if subject has been sober for the past 3 years.   
16. Any clinically significant psychiatric condition that would prohibit  patient willingness or 
ability to successfully complete study procedures, per investigator discretion  
17. Patients with an allergy to or an inability to have gadolinium contrast dye administered 
with MRI  
18. Patients with aneurysm clips or implanted metal objects in the brain  
19. Patients with significant skin breakdown on the scalp  
20. Patients who cannot receive standard of care radiation therapy and can only receive 
hypofractionated radiation due to age and poor performance status , per investigator 
discretion 
 
 
Criteria for Removal from Study Therapy 
Criteria for removal from study therapy include: 
1. Patient request - The patient may withdraw from the study at any time. 
2. Intolerable toxicity - Patients may discontinue therapy for intolerable adverse events 
attributable to the device.  Any serious adverse event deemed life threatening by the 
treating physician that is definitely related to the study device will be cause for immediate 
cessation of treatment.   
3. Investigator judgment, progression – Investigator confirmed tumor progression by study 
criteria. 
4. Investigator judgment, safety – Investigator may discontinue treatment due to concerns of 
safety. This includes significant neurological decline during treatment or requirement of 
steroids beyond the daily limit of 8mg of dexamethasone or bioequivalent dose for more 
than 7 consecutive days. 
5. Lack of compliance - The Sponsor or investigator may remove a patient from study therapy 
for lack of compliance to the study protocol. Patients who are using the TTField treatment 
less than 75% of the minimum recommended usage of 18 hours a day on average, as 
assessed monthly (13 hours a day or less), unless per officially instituted dose reduction, may 
be discontinued at the discretion of the investigator or sponsor. 
6. Inter-current illness – Illness that prevents further administration of treatment. 
 
Enrollment Plan 
a) Anticipated Start Date 
• 
Dosimetric testing and analysis planned for September, 2019. 
 
• 
Screening planned to begin November, 2019. 
b) Total Expected Duration of the Clinical Trial 
Anticipated duration of the trial will be 36 months from start of screening to completing two 
year long-term follow of the last patient enrolled. 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 30 of 64 
Confidential 
 
c) Expected Duration of Each Subject's Participation 
Up to 24 months from subject screening date to the point of study discontinuation based on 
specified criteria above or completion of the clinical trial. 
 
e) Estimated Time Needed to Select the Required Number of Subjects (i.e., Enrollment Period) 
The anticipated initial enrollment period for the 6 subjects in the lead-in cohort will be 4-8 
weeks, with 3 subjects from each of the 2 study sites.   
 
Following the interim analysis of safety for the lead-in cohort, there will be an expansion of 
enrollment to 15 patients, followed by another safety stop and interim analysis.  The final 
cohort will comprise a total of 30 patients between the 2 participating sites.  At least 1/3 of the 
subjects will be enrolled from each of the 2 study sites to ensure even enrollment (i.e., at least 
10 subjects at each site).   Anticipated duration for subject enrollment will be 6 to 12 months 
from start of screening to last subject enrolled in study. 
 
 
Clinical Trial-Related Procedures 
The study-specific assessments are detailed in this section and outlined in the Appendix 3 Study 
Calendar.  Screening assessments must be performed within 21 days prior to the first treatment 
with investigational product.  Any results falling outside of the reference ranges may be 
repeated at the discretion of the investigator. All study visit procedures are allowed a window 
of ±7 days unless otherwise noted.  Treatment or visit delays for public holidays or weather 
conditions do not constitute a protocol violation. 
A written, signed, informed consent form (ICF) must be obtained before any study-specific 
assessments are initiated.  A signed copy of the signed ICF will be given to the subject and a 
copy will be filed in the medical record.  The original will be kept on file with the study records.   
All patients who are consented will be entered in the Providence Brain and Spine Institute’s 
password protected clinical trial management system (CTMS), Velos.  Velos will also be used by 
the study sites as an electronic data capturing system to enter study data. 
 
Pretreatment Period 
       Subject Recruitment & Screening 
Potential subjects will be recruited from the investigators’ and subinvestigators’ clinical 
practices.  Every effort will be made to preserve subject confidentiality according to each site’s 
policies and limit the use of protected health information in accordance with the requirements 
of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).  The study sites will 
also make efforts to recruit and retain women and members of minority groups in order to 
reflect the composition of the adult U.S. population as closely as possible with regard to age, 
gender, ethnicity and race.   
 
Pre-Study 
Prospective participants must have had a contrast-enhanced MRI post-tumor resection 
procedure.  If the subject had a biopsy alone without resection, a cranial CT may be used 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 31 of 64 
Confidential 
 
instead of a MRI, provided they had a preoperative MRI scan within 14 days of biopsy. 
Screening can occur after this post-operative imaging is completed. 
1. Screening can occur after this post-operative MRI.   
2. Have had tumor resection surgery at day -42 to day -21 or stereotactic biopsy at day -14 to 
day -28. Patients who were only able to have a biopsy safely and not full resection have a 
shorter window from procedure date to Day 1.  
3. Prospective participants will be pre-screened for the above inclusion and exclusion criteria.  
They will then undergo a screening pretreatment evaluation. 
Screening 
The following Screening procedures and assessments will start between Day -21 and Day 0.  
• Obtain informed consent 
• Vital signs: height (only at screening), weight, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, and 
resting blood pressure 
• Demographic collection. To include: date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity, and education 
level 
• Physical examination including neurologic exam and head and neck exam to evaluate 
surgical healing and contraindications to radiation and TTField therapy 
• Complete medical history, including all prior and current conditions at the time of 
screening 
• Smoking, alcohol, and substance use history 
• Documentation of pathology proven glioblastoma or gliosarcoma 
• Documentation of disease assessment, status and extent of measurable disease on 
imaging 
• KPS (performance) assessment 
• History of prior treatments and any residual toxicity relating to prior treatment 
• Concomitant medication review and prior medications taken within 7 days of Day 1 
• Confirmation of MGMT testing in process. If results are in process at time of screening, 
review at each subsequent visit until resulted.  
• Documentation of IDH mutation status by immunohistochemistry or genetics. This is for 
classification of the tumors but not an exclusion criteria. If results in process at time of 
screening, review at each subsequent visit until resulted. 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Blood chemistry assessment, including: 
o Alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase 
(ALT/AST), total bilirubin, calcium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total 
protein, albumin, fasting glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 32 of 64 
Confidential 
 
• Coagulation assessment, including prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, 
international normalized ratio (PT/PTT/INR) 
• Serum or urine pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential) 
• Confirmation of imaging (MRI) of the brain for tumor/lesion completed during pre-study 
period 
• Review of Imaging (MRI) of the brain for tumor/lesion assessment, including collection 
and review of prior relevant brain MRIs 
• Patient imaging will be sent to Novocure for treatment planning using NovoTALTM and 
determining the appropriate transducer array layout.  This must be done within 14 days 
prior to Day 1 (typically requires 5 business days).  Patients will be trained by the 
investigator or the device specialist on the placement of the arrays.  
• Electrocardiogram (ECG) at screening only. To be collected and read by cardiology 
department.  
• Documentation of seizure frequency along with type of seizure (generalized or partial) 
and/or headache severity and frequency 
• 
Scheduling of radiation oncology initial clinical visit and planning for therapy, if not 
already completed at the time of screening. Radiation oncology clinical visit is per 
standard of care.  
• 
Adverse events to be assessed beginning after time of informed consent  
• 
Eligibility assessment 
 
Study Enrollment  
Once the subject has been scheduled for radiation oncology planning and all eligibility criteria 
are met, the subject will be able to move to the Day 1 clinic visit for enrollment into the trial. 
•  RT and TMZ are to be initiated after the clinic visit.  TTField therapy can be initiated 
either that same day or no more than 7 days from the Day 1 clinic visit. 
• For this purpose, the staff will also coordinate with Novocure for a Device Support 
Specialist (DSS) trained by Novocure to initiate treatment either in clinic or at the 
subject’s home within the above time frame.   
Treatment Period 
Study Procedures, Trimodal therapy phase – Day 1 of treatment is marked by the Day 1 
clinic visit, just prior to initiation of trimodal therapy.  
• The following guidelines should be observed regarding the sequence of initiating 
trimodal therapy: 
o TTField therapy can start as soon as the same day as the day 1 clinic visit, no 
more than 7 days after the day 1 visit, and up to 14 days before RT/TMZ 
initiation. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 33 of 64 
Confidential 
 
o TTField therapy must be initiated prior to RT simulation and mask preparation. 
▪ Preferably, patients would have the TTF initiated for a few days prior to 
radiation therapy to adjust for user errors and patient issues. 
o RT should be initiated no more than 14 days after the day 1 visit. Subjects will 
receive radiation therapy within 4-6 weeks of their surgical resection or 2-4 
weeks of their biopsy for the purpose of ensuring proper wound-healing. 
o TMZ treatment should also be coordinated to start on the first day of RT, but 
starting no more than 7 days after start of RT is acceptable and will not be 
recorded as a treatment delay. TMZ may start within 24 hours before RT, per 
investigator discretion.  
 
 
During this phase, study procedures should be completed +/- 7 days from the Day specified 
unless otherwise noted. 
 
During this phase, patients will undergo weekly skin checks by radiation oncology or neuro-
oncology. Transducer arrays must be off the skin in order to perform a careful examination of 
the skin for toxicity.  The patient and physician needs to time the changing of transducer arrays 
such that the arrays are not worn during weekly visits.  The same practice applies to skin checks 
after the trimodal therapy phase and during adjuvant treatment per the standard of care. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 34 of 64 
Confidential 
 
 
Trimodal therapy, Day 1 (21-42 days from surgery or 14-28 days from stereotactic biopsy)   
The following procedures are to be completed on Day 1 prior to TTField initiation: 
• Vital signs: weight, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, and resting blood pressure.  
• Physical examination including neurologic exam, head and neck exam, and scalp exam 
to evaluate surgical healing and contraindications to radiation and TTField therapy. 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• KPS (performance) assessment 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count (if completed for 
screening within 14 days of Day 1, does not need to be repeated) 
• Blood chemistry assessment, including (if completed for screening within 14 days of Day 
1, does not need to be repeated): 
o Alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase 
(ALT/AST), total bilirubin, calcium,  blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total 
protein, albumin, fasting glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate 
• Documentation of seizure frequency along with type of seizure (generalized or partial) 
and/or headache severity and frequency.  
• Eligibility assessment 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator  
 
When the above procedures are completed, TTField therapy may be initiated: 
• TTField therapy (see treatment modalities for detailed description of treatment and 
parameters) will be initiated by the investigator by calling the device support specialist 
to confirm the patient is ready.  The Device Support Specialist (DSS) will visit the patient 
in their home or in the clinic and initiate treatment with TTField therapy (Accounting for 
scheduling, treatment initiation within 7 days from the Day 1 visit is acceptable and will 
not be marked as treatment delay).   
 
Day 8 of Trimodal therapy  
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation Oncology or Neuro-
Oncology (document attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation 
with the ceramic disc or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). Treatment of mild skin 
toxicity as appropriate. If there are concerns of worsening skin toxicity, treatment break 
from Optune or consider referral to dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer 
arrays will need to be removed/replaced for exam). 
• 
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Adverse event assessment 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 35 of 64 
Confidential 
 
• 
Concomitant medication review 
• 
Continuation of TTField Therapy 
• Initiate radiation therapy in accordance with standard of care as detailed under 
treatment modalities. 
• 
Initiate daily TMZ chemotherapy ideally on the same day as radiation in accordance with 
standard of care as detailed under treatment modalities. TMZ initiation up to 7 days 
after start of RT is permissible and will not be deemed a deviation. 
• 
In addition to clinic visits and instruction, the patient also has access to device support 
specialist for routine skin care issues as part of the standard of care for patients on 
active treatment with tumor treating field therapy. In between visits, the patient will be 
asked to report any notable skin toxicity to their neuro-oncologist office. 
 
Day 15 (±7 days) 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation Oncology or Neuro-
Oncology (document attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation 
with the ceramic disc or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). Treatment of mild skin 
toxicity as appropriate. If there are concerns of worsening skin toxicity, referral to 
dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need to be 
removed/replaced for exam). 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• 
Continuation of TTField Therapy 
• 
Continuation of RT 
• 
Continuation of TMZ therapy 
 
Day 22 (±7 days) 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation Oncology or Neuro-
Oncology (document attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation 
with the ceramic disc or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). Treatment of mild skin 
toxicity as appropriate. If there are concerns of worsening skin toxicity, referral to 
dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need to be 
removed/replaced for exam). 
• Neurological examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation oncology or 
Neuro-oncology. 
• 
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 36 of 64 
Confidential 
 
• 
Continuation of TTField Therapy 
• 
Continuation of RT 
• 
Continuation of TMZ therapy 
 
Day 29 (±7 days) 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation Oncology or Neuro-
Oncology (document attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation 
with the ceramic disc or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). Treatment of mild skin 
toxicity as appropriate. If there are concerns of worsening skin toxicity, referral to 
dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need to be 
removed/replaced for exam). 
• 
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• 
Continuation of TTField Therapy 
• 
Continuation of RT 
• 
Continuation of TMZ therapy 
 
Day 36 (±7 days) 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation Oncology or Neuro-
Oncology (document attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation 
with the ceramic disc or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). Treatment of mild skin 
toxicity as appropriate. If there are concerns of worsening skin toxicity, referral to 
dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need to be 
removed/replaced for exam). 
• 
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• 
Continuation of TTField Therapy 
• 
Continuation of RT 
• 
Continuation of TMZ therapy 
 
Day 43 (±7 days) Final week of Trimodal therapy 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation Oncology or Neuro-
Oncology (document attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation 
with the ceramic disc or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). Treatment of mild skin 
toxicity as appropriate. If there are concerns of worsening skin toxicity, referral to 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 37 of 64 
Confidential 
 
dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need to be 
removed/replaced for exam). 
• Neurological examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation oncology or 
Neuro-oncology. 
• 
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• 
Continuation of TTField Therapy 
• 
Continuation of RT until Day 49 + 7 days, as clinically appropriate    
• 
Continuation of TMZ therapy until Day 49 + 7 days, as clinically appropriate   
 
Day 64 (±7 days) Post initial chemoradiation continued DLT window  
This is marked by continued TTField therapy alone for 4 weeks with the following procedures 
for continued monitoring of DLTs and TRAEs. One visit to be conducted in the middle of the 4 
weeks with the following procedures. 
• 
Vital signs: weight, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, and resting blood pressure.  
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Neuro-Oncology (document 
attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation with the ceramic disc 
or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). Treatment of mild skin toxicity as appropriate. 
If there are concerns of worsening skin toxicity, referral to dermatologist for specialist 
evaluation (transducer arrays will need to be removed/replaced for exam). 
• Physical examination including neurologic exam, skin and scalp assessment. 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• Continue TTField therapy 
 
Study procedures, Adjuvant therapy phase and monitoring of delayed toxicities until 8 weeks 
after completion of trimodal therapy. 
This would fall 4 weeks after completion of radiation therapy and marked by initiation of TMZ 
chemotherapy on a 5 out of 28-day cycle along with continued TTField therapy per the standard 
of care.  MRIs are recommended every 2 months during temozolomide therapy.  Day 1 of cycle 
1 and cycle 2 are marked by continued treatment per the standard of care along with 
assessments for delayed TRAEs following trimodal therapy and continued DLT window (4 weeks 
and 8 weeks after completion of trimodal therapy). 
 
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 38 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Adjuvant TMZ therapy, Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Study Day 78 ± 5 days) with delayed toxicity 
monitoring. 
• MRI of the brain with and without contrast (transducer arrays will need to be 
removed/replaced for imaging) 
• Vital signs: weight, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, and resting blood pressure.  
• Physical examination including neurologic exam, skin and scalp assessment. 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Neuro-Oncology (document 
attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation with the ceramic disc 
or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). If there are concerns of worsening skin 
toxicity, referral to dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need 
to be removed/replaced for exam). 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• Documentation of disease assessment, clinical response or deterioration, status and 
extent of measurable disease on imaging 
• Objective response assessment 
• KPS (performance) assessment 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Blood chemistry assessment, including: 
o Alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase 
(ALT/AST), total bilirubin, calcium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total 
protein, albumin, fasting glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate 
• Initiate Cycle 1, day 1 treatment of adjuvant TMZ on a 5 out of 28-day cycle as detailed 
under treatment modalities. Dosing will start at 150mg/m2/day for the first cycle and 
then increased if tolerated to 200mg/m2/day for all subsequent cycles.  
• Continue TTField therapy. Total duration of treatment will be 24 months from the start 
of therapy (including back to trimodal treatment day 1) unless discontinued for other 
reasons (see criteria for removal of study therapy). 
• In addition to clinic visits and assessments, the subject also has access to a device 
support specialist for routine skin care issues as part of the standard of care for patients 
on active treatment with tumor treating field therapy. In between visits, the patient will 
be asked to report any notable skin toxicity to their neuro-oncologist office. 
• TTField compliance assessment (to be completed monthly, may not be available at each 
visit) 
 
Day 22 (± 3 days) of Cycle 1 
• 
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• 
Continue TTField therapy 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 39 of 64 
Confidential 
 
• Adverse event assessment 
• 
Concomitant medication review 
• 
Access to device support specialist 
• 
TTField compliance assessment (to be completed monthly, may not be available at each visit) 
 
Day 1 of Cycle 2, Day 1 (Study Day 106 ± 5 days) with delayed toxicity monitoring. 
• Vital signs: weight, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, and resting blood pressure.  
• Physical examination including neurologic exam, skin and scalp assessment. 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Neuro-Oncology (document 
attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation with the ceramic disc 
or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). If there are concerns of worsening skin 
toxicity, referral to dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need 
to be removed/replaced for exam). 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• Documentation of disease assessment, clinical response or deterioration, status and 
extent of measurable disease on imaging, using MRI from Day 1 of Cycle 1 for 
assessment 
• Objective response assessment, using MRI from Day 1 of Cycle 1 for assessment 
• KPS (performance) assessment 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Blood chemistry assessment, including: 
o Alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase 
(ALT/AST), total bilirubin, calcium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total 
protein, albumin, fasting glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate 
• Initiate 2nd cycle of adjuvant TMZ as detailed under treatment modalities.  Note that 
beginning with cycle 2, the dose is increased to 200mg/m2/day for all subsequent cycles 
if tolerability criteria are met. 
• Continue TTField therapy 
• 
Access to device support specialist 
• TTField compliance assessment (to be completed monthly, may not be available at each 
visit) 
 
Day 22 (± 3 days) of Cycle 2  
To be completed as part of standard of care. Noted here for clarity, but not being collected as 
part of the trial. 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Continue TTField therapy 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 40 of 64 
Confidential 
 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• 
Access to device support specialist 
• 
TTField compliance assessment (to be completed monthly, may not be available at each 
visit) 
Following cycle 2, the patient will continue therapy with temozolomide and TTFields treatment 
per the standard of care, which is a minimum of 6 cycles. The following are not strict 
requirements for continued participation in the trial but recommendations per the standard of 
care on how to proceed through TMZ and TTField therapy with appropriate lab and MRI 
monitoring.  For continued participation in the trial, patients must continue to follow up every 
2-3 months with a repeat MRI of the brain so that clinical outcomes data can be collected for 
the secondary analyses (transducer arrays will need to be removed/replaced for imaging).   
 
Subsequent cycles of adjuvant therapy 
The following is recommended for patients receiving continued temozolomide and TTFields 
therapy.  Clinical outcomes analyses based on intention-to-treat will be performed on subjects 
treated for at least one day per the standard of care as follows.  Repeat above procedures 
following the protocol for cycle 1 and cycle 2 for a minimum total of 6 full cycles of TMZ with 
the exception that after cycle 1 (150mg/m2/day), all cycles use a dose of 200mg/m2/day.  
Otherwise, the procedures for odd-numbered cycles 3 and 5 (and potentially beyond, per 
standard of care) match those detailed for cycle 1 above (phase 1). The procedures for even-
numbered cycles 4 and 6 (and potentially beyond, per standard of care) match those detailed 
for cycle 2 above (phase 2).  A repeat MRI is recommended on the first day of every odd 
numbered cycle (cycle 1, 3, and 5) +/- 7 days, which is roughly every 2 months.  
• Cycle 3: follow cycle 1 procedures (except dose remains at 200mg/m2/day) 
• Cycle 4: follow cycle 2 procedures 
• Cycle 5: follow cycle 1 procedures (except dose remains at 200mg/m2/day) 
• Cycle 6: follow cycle 2 procedures 
Cycle 6, day 28 marks the completion of the full 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ per the standard of 
care.  If there is no contraindication, TMZ may be discontinued at that time.  If there is clinical 
cause, physicians may opt to continue TMZ therapy longer beyond the 6 cycles.  Otherwise, 
TTField therapy alone will be continued for maintenance.  
 
Maintenance TTField therapy (Long-Term Follow-up) 
At the end of the adjuvant therapy, the subject will continue TTF treatment per the standard of 
care, and the study will follow clinical outcomes via the chart and by telephone as needed. It is 
recommended that the subject have a follow-up MRI, objective response assessments, physical 
exam, and medication review with their neuro-oncologist at least every 3 months during this 
time for up to 2 years. Refer to sections on evaluation of response and evaluation of 
pseudoresponse for criteria of assessments.  Investigators at each site will document the date 
of confirmed progression on MRI scan and or death, and cause of death for every subject that 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 41 of 64 
Confidential 
 
has been on treatment for at least 1 day (disease assessment/extend of measurable disease on 
imaging with clinical response or deterioration, when an MRI has been completed per standard 
care).  Site study coordinators will review patient records at minimum every 6 months starting 
from the date of initial Trimodal therapy while patients remain on study to collect data on TTF 
compliance, treatment response, disease progression, and survival. This will provide the 
secondary outcomes that will be analyzed and reported at the close of the study.   
 
Unscheduled Visit, anytime during the Study Period (Day 1-Day 106 ± 5 days) 
An unscheduled visit may be used if the investigator feels they need to see the patient for a 
safety concern or an additional indicated exam that is outside of a specified protocol visit 
window. Any of the following may be completed, per investigator discretion, based on where 
the patient is currently in the study.  
• MRI of the brain with and without contrast (transducer arrays will need to be 
removed/replaced for imaging) 
• Vital signs: weight, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, and resting blood pressure  
• Physical examination including neurologic exam, skin and scalp assessment 
• Skin examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Neuro-Oncology (document 
attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation with the ceramic disc 
or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays). If there are concerns of worsening skin 
toxicity, referral to dermatologist for specialist evaluation (transducer arrays will need 
to be removed/replaced for exam). 
• Neurological examination by investigator or subinvestigator in Radiation oncology or 
Neuro-oncology 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• Documentation of disease assessment, clinical response or deterioration, status and 
extent of measurable disease on imaging 
• Objective response assessment 
• KPS (performance) assessment 
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential and platelet count 
• Blood chemistry assessment, including: 
o Alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase 
(ALT/AST), total bilirubin, calcium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total 
protein, albumin, fasting glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate 
• In addition to clinic visits and assessments, the subject also has access to a device 
support specialist for routine skin care issues as part of the standard of care for patients 
on active treatment with tumor treating field therapy. In between visits, the patient will 
be asked to report any notable skin toxicity to their neuro-oncologist office. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 42 of 64 
Confidential 
 
• TTField compliance assessment (to be completed monthly, may not be available at each 
visit) 
• 
Continuation of TTField Therapy (if applicable) 
• 
Continuation of RT Therapy (if applicable) 
• 
Continuation of TMZ therapy (if applicable) 
 
Early Termination Phone Visit, anytime during the Study Period (Day 1-Day 106 ± 5 days) 
If a subject stops study treatment on or before Day 1 of Cycle 2 of the Adjuvant TMZ Therapy 
Phase, they may continue in the trial for observational purposes, if willing, in order to perform 
the intention-to-treat analysis. If a subject is unwilling to continue in the trial, an early 
termination phone visit will be conducted. 
• Adverse event assessment 
• Concomitant medication review 
• TTField compliance assessment (to be completed monthly, may not be available at each 
visit) 
 
 
Treatment Modalities 
a) Optune™ Treatment  
Treatment planning: Transducer array layout will be determined by Novocure using the 
NovoTALTM software.   
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 43 of 64 
Confidential 
 
1. Patient training: Patients will be trained in the use of the device by the investigator, a 
designated health care provider (e.g. nurse, medical assistant, research coordinator) or 
Device Support Specialist (DSS) trained by Novocure.  
2. Treatment initiation: Optune™ will be initiated by the investigator within 7 days of the 
day 1 clinic visit.  All patients will be required to shave their heads to initiate array 
placement and Optune™.  Array placement will be performed based on the Transducer 
Array Layout map calculated during treatment planning.  The investigator or the device 
specialist will train patients on how to use the map and avoid placing the discs on 
protruding craniotomy plates, screws, and scars.  
3. Treatment duration: Treatment with the device will be continuous with breaks allowed 
for personal needs (e.g. showering, array exchange). Patients must use the device for at 
least 18 hours a day on average. Treatment will be continued until tumor progression, 
death, or unacceptable side effects to patient. Patients must use the device for a 
minimum of 4 weeks from treatment initiation. A treatment break of 3 days in Optune™ 
every month is allowed. However, the patient should use the device for at least 18 
hours a day on average as stated above. 
4. The Optune™ System will be programmed by Novocure to deliver 200kHz TTFields in 
two sequential, perpendicular field directions at a maximal intensity of 707mA RMS. 
There will be no adjustments made to the device by investigators or patients/caregivers.  
5. Transducer Array replacement: Patients will replace the Transducer Arrays twice to 
three times per week with the help of a caregiver. The Transducer Arrays will need to be 
replaced at study visits that require them to be removed to complete a protocol 
required procedure. At each array replacement the patient’s scalp will be re-shaved and 
skin treated according to the guidelines set out below. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                           
 
 
 
6. Compliance assessment: The device usage will be extracted by a Novocure 
representative and the data will be reported to the investigator on a monthly basis to 
assess patient compliance with therapy.  Patients who are using the TTField treatment 
less than 75% of the minimum recommended usage of 18 hours a day on average, as 
assessed monthly (13 hours a day or less), unless per officially instituted dose reduction, 
may discontinue therapy at the discretion of the investigator or sponsor. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 44 of 64 
Confidential 
 
7. The following skin care guidelines should be closely adhered to: 
a. If the skin beneath the Transducer Arrays is inflamed, a high potency topical 
steroid (e.g. clobetasol) may be prescribed to the patient. The patient or 
caregiver should apply the ointment after removing the arrays and cleaning the 
scalp with baby oil and medical alcohol. The ointment should be left on the scalp 
for at least 30 minutes prior to washing the skin with a mild shampoo and 
applying a new set of arrays.  
b. At each array replacement, the new set of arrays should be shifted by 
approximately 2 cm compared to the previous layout so that the array discs are 
placed between the areas of skin irritation. At the next array replacement, the 
arrays should be shifted back to their original location. 
c. If the dermis is breached (skin erosions, ulcers, open sores, punctate lesions, 
etc.) an antibiotic ointment (e.g. mupirocin) should be prescribed and used in 
place of the steroid ointment. Any evidence of infection should result in bacterial 
cultures being taken. During radiotherapy, a break from the Optune array is 
mandatory if there is ulceration or open sores.  
8. Expected and potential treatment-related acute adverse effects include: Localized skin toxicity, 
anxiety, headaches, fatigue, insomnia, seizures. 
 
Dose modifications during TTField therapy (applies to all phases of therapy--trimodal therapy, 
adjuvant therapy, or maintenance therapy, including for the safety lead-ins): 
Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity (skin toxicity, neurologic symptom, etc): 
reduce device usage schedule to 50% or 1 week on, 1 week off to allow for 
recovery.  If toxicity remains grade 3 or above for 1 month after reduced usage, 
then discontinue therapy.  If non-hematologic toxicity moves to grade 2 or 
below, titrate up as soon as able to tolerate, per investigator discretion. If skin 
toxicity improves to grade 2 or below in the 1-month period, the original TTF 
usage can be resumed per investigator discretion.  If TTF therapy could not be 
resumed in the 1-month period and has to be discontinued then it would be 
considered DLT for Optune use. 
 
b) Concomitant chemoradiation: The use of radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy 
for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is considered standard of care.  Furthermore, 
TTField therapy with Optune™ is also approved for post-radiation adjuvant treatment of newly 
diagnosed glioblastoma (see preclinical data). The use of these treatment modalities will follow 
established parameters and guidelines and will be briefly reviewed in this section. However, 
trimodal treatment at the outset with radiation, TMZ, and Optune™ (TTField) therapy has not 
been studied and may require adjustments for safety and tolerability.  
 
1. Radiation therapy 
Subjects will receive radiation therapy within 4-6 weeks of their surgical resection or 2-4 weeks 
of their biopsy for the purpose of ensuring proper wound-healing. Treatment will be mapped 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 45 of 64 
Confidential 
 
and delivered by a qualified radiation oncologist to a target dose of 60 Gray (Gy) in equally 
divided fractions of 2 Gy to the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) delivered over 30 fractions over a 
period of 42 days + 7 days (about 6 weeks; to Day 49 + 7 days). At the discretion of the 
Radiation Oncologist, particularly for large treatment volumes, the prescription dose may be 
59.4 Gy in 33 fractions of 1.8 Gy. The subject will undergo treatment mapping and production 
of a high-quality mask to immobilize the head for treatment.  An initial CT image of the 
subject’s head is obtained and fused to the post-surgical MRI of the brain for treatment 
mapping and used for conebeam CT image alignment before treatment delivery.  Due to the 
presence of the transducer arrays on the scalp, a phantom model will be employed to 
investigate radiation dosimetry effects and any interference with the making of a high-quality 
immobilization mask. These exploratory studies will provide guidance on any necessary 
adjustments for subjects for safe and effective radiation treatment of tumor (See RT).  Expected 
and potential treatment-related acute adverse effects include skin reactions, alopecia, 
headache, fatigue, seizure, tumor necrosis, memory impairment, and altered cognition. 
 
Radiation therapy without interruptions 
Completion of radiotherapy course uninterrupted will be prioritized. Grade 3-4 skin toxicity 
during RT course will result in at least 1 week break from TTF therapy (with reduced Optune 
dosing for up to one month as above) with resumption following physician evaluation and 
clearance. 
 
2. Temozolomide chemotherapy 
Subjects will receive TMZ chemotherapy as part of the trimodal therapy phase concurrently 
with radiation and TTField therapy.  This will be administered orally by the subjects at a dose of 
75mg/m2 (of their body surface area) daily during radiation therapy (typically for 42 consecutive 
days including on weekends, up to 49 days is acceptable; to Day 49 + 7 days).   Subjects will 
then discontinue the chemotherapy and have a 4-week break after radiation prior to resuming 
TMZ adjuvant therapy concurrent with TTField therapy alone.  Doses will then be administered 
for 5 consecutive days out of a 28-day cycle.  For the first cycle of adjuvant therapy, subjects 
will be dosed at 150mg/m2/day for 5 days out of 28 days in the first cycle, and increased if 
tolerated to 200mg/m2/day and continue that dose until the end of chemotherapy. The 
standard requirement is for 6 cycles of adjuvant treatment post-radiation but this may be 
extended per the judgment of the subject’s treating clinician to no more than 12 cycles of 
adjuvant TMZ therapy.  Please see package insert for full details.  Expected and potential 
treatment-related acute adverse effects include: Nausea, fatigue, constipation, liver toxicity, 
myelosuppression resulting in thrombocytopenia, leukopenia (or neutropenia), anemia, or 
pancytopenia. 
 
Initiation of PJP prophylaxis is recommended but each site will be given discretion to follow 
their institutional protocols. 
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 46 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Dose modifications during Trimodal therapy phase 
ANC ≥500/mm3 but <1,500/mm3 or platelet count ≥10,000/mm3 but 
<100,000/mm3 or grade 2 nonhematologic toxicity (excludes alopecia, 
nausea/vomiting): Interrupt therapy 
ANC <500/mm3 or platelet count <10,000/mm3 or grade 3/4 nonhematologic 
toxicity (excludes alopecia, nausea/vomiting): Discontinue therapy 
Dose modifications during adjuvant therapy phase (concurrent with TTField therapy only) 
ANC <1,000/mm3, platelet count <50,000/mm3, or grade 3 nonhematologic 
toxicity (excludes alopecia, nausea/vomiting) during previous cycle: 
Decrease dose by 1 dose level (by 50 mg/m2/day for 5 days), unless dose has 
already been lowered to 100 mg/m2/day, then discontinue therapy. 
If dose reduction <100 mg/m2/day is required or grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity 
(excludes alopecia, nausea/vomiting), or if the same grade 3 
nonhematologic toxicity occurs after dose reduction: Discontinue therapy 
7. SUBJECT ASSESSMENTS FOR SAFETY AND EFFICACY 
The study procedure calendar for this study is provided in Appendix 3.  
 
a) Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability 
Dose Limiting Toxicity 
Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) are defined as any severe or life-threatening treatment-related 
toxicity that precludes the use of a specified dose of any of the study treatments (TTFields, 
temozolomide, radiation) including continued use of Optune TTFields device at the standard 
treatment levels and schedule set out by prior studies.  This study will prioritize preserving the 
standard of care for glioblastoma using approved dosing and radiation of temozolomide and 
radiation.  
 
Toxicities will be graded according to the CTCAE (Version 5.0) scale. If multiple toxicities are 
seen, the presence of DLT should be based on the most severe toxicity experienced. Dose-
limiting toxicities will be defined as any of the following events which occur during the 
experimental trimodal therapy with TTFields is added concurrently to radiation and 
temozolomide therapy or during the 8 weeks after RT is completed, and are considered by the 
investigator to be attributable to TTFields or the combination of 
TTFields with radiation and/or temozolomide: 
• Any Grade >3 thrombocytopenia, and Grade 4 anemia and neutropenia. 
• Any nonhematologic Grade >3 toxicity (including nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), 
excluding alopecia. 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 47 of 64 
Confidential 
 
• Any Grade 3-4 radiation-induced skin changes that persist for greater than 7 days and 
does not improve with management recommendations as outlined in toxicity 
management.  
• Any adverse effect deemed by the investigator, patient’s primary neuro-oncologist, or 
radiation oncologist to be life threatening in nature. 
 
In the event of a dose-limiting toxicity, the subject will be discontinued from treatment and 
followed for toxicity assessment and management and a joint decision will be made by the 
investigator and sponsor whether to adjust the dose or schedule for other subjects or 
permanently close the study for safety.  In the event that more than 33% of subjects experience 
a DLT, the study cannot continue unless a modification is made to the level of the particular 
treatment to which that adverse event is definitely attributable.  As preliminary safety stops, 
the study will include two safety lead-ins receiving TTFields with concurrent chemoradiation. 
These initial 6 and then 15 subjects will undergo interim analyses after completion of 
chemoradiation to determine if the expanded cohorts should be permitted enrollment as 
planned or if a dose reduction in TTFields of 50% of the scheduled use is warranted for safety.   
 
Subjects will continue to receive study treatment until confirmed tumor progression, 
unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria as described; subjects MUST discontinue 
investigational product (and non-investigational product at the discretion of the investigator) if 
they meet criteria for removal from study therapy as referenced in that section. 
 
Toxicity related to TTFields treatment: Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and severe 
treatment-related adverse events (STRAEs) will be assessed in the following ways.   
• Patients will be evaluated by a neuro-oncologist or radiation oncologist for potential 
skin toxicity from TTFields therapy.  Routine skin care recommendations will be 
provided, including use clobetasol cream prior to electrode placement and adjusting 
array placement to avoid continued site irritation. If there are concerns by investigator, 
the subject will be referred to a dermatologist for specialized evaluation. Neurological 
and general physical evaluations as well as laboratory assessments will also be 
conducted by a neuro-oncologist or radiation oncologist to identify other potential 
toxicities. 
• In addition to clinic visits and interventions, Patients will also be supported by a 
technician from Novocure for device troubleshooting and compliance checks. 
• All other adverse effects, either mild, or serious, will be triaged by a physician in 
coordination with the primary investigators of the study. 
• All adverse events, whether minor or serious will be reported according to protocol 
guidelines (see Reporting of adverse events). 
 
b) Evaluation of Response 
Patients will be evaluated for response using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology 
(RANO) criteria32. Subjects who have lesions equal or less than 1cm on baseline will only be 
followed for assessment of progressive (PD) or stable disease (SD).  SD will be marked by 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 48 of 64 
Confidential 
 
the lack of observable progression on MRI.  PD will be marked by any growth or recurrence 
of lesions consistent with tumor on MRI based on RANO criteria as follows: 
 
Table #: RANO criteria for Response Assessment Incorporating MRI and Clinical Factors32 
Response 
Criteria 
Complete Response 
Requires all of the following: complete disappearance of all 
enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at 
least 4 weeks; no new lesions; stable or improved nonenhancing 
(T2/FLAIR) lesions; subjects must be off corticosteroids (or on 
physiologic replacement doses only); and stable or improved 
clinically. Note: subjects with nonmeasurable disease only cannot 
have a complete response; the best response possible is stable 
disease.  
 
Partial Response 
Requires all of the following: 50% or greater decrease compared with 
baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all 
measurable enhancing lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; no 
progression of nonmeasurable disease; no new lesions; stable or 
improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower dose of 
corticosteroids compared with baseline scan; the corticosteroid dose 
at the time of the scan evaluation should be no greater than the dose 
at time of baseline scan; and stable or improved clinically. Note: 
Subjects with nonmeasurable disease only cannot have a partial 
response; the best response possible is stable disease.  
Stable Disease 
Requires all of the following: does not qualify for complete response, 
partial response, or progression; stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) 
lesions on same or lower dose of corticosteroids compared with 
baseline scan. In the event that the corticosteroid dose was 
increased for new symptoms and signs without confirmation of 
disease progression on neuroimaging, and subsequent follow-up 
imaging shows that this increase in corticosteroids was required 
because of disease progression, the last scan considered to show 
stable disease will be the scan obtained when the corticosteroid dose 
was equivalent to the baseline dose.  
Progression 
Defined by any of the following: Greater than or equal to 25% 
increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of 
enhancing lesions compared with the smallest tumor measurement 
obtained either at baseline (if no decrease) or best response, on 
stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids*; significant increase in 
T2/FLAIR nonenhancing lesions on stable or increasing doses of 
corticosteroids compared with baseline scan or best response after 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 49 of 64 
Confidential 
 
initiation of therapy* not cause by comorbid events (eg, radiation 
therapy, demyelination, ischemic injury, infection, seizures, post-
operative changes, or other treatment effects); any new lesion; clear 
clinical deterioration not attributable to other causes apart from the 
tumor (eg, seizures, medication adverse effects, complications of 
therapy, cerebrovascular events, infection, and so on) or changes in 
corticosteroid dose; failure to return for evaluation as a result of 
death or deteriorating condition; or clear progression of non-
measurable disease.  
 
Evaluation of Pseudoprogression 
Pseudoprogression is defined as worsening of the MRI lesions (enhancing lesion, T2/FLAIR 
hyperintense nonenhancing lesions) as a result of effects other than tumor growth. These can 
be the result of treatment effects from radiation, TTField therapy, or chemotherapy, or changes 
in the steroid dose.  Pseudoprogression is typically self-limited and suggests different clinical 
implications from true progression of the brain tumor.   However, clinically and 
radiographically, pseudoprogression and tumor progression are difficult to distinguish.   
MRIs in this study will be evaluated centrally by the principal investigator according to RANO 
criteria and definitions and need to account for possible pseudoprogression from any of the 
treatments.  Therefore, in this trial, if a subject has an MRI scan concerning for progression 
without substantial neurological symptoms or signs within 6 months of starting TTFields 
therapy, it is recommended that the subject continue therapy and obtain a follow-up scan 
approximately 4 weeks apart to confirm progression.  If that follow-up scan confirms 
progression, the patient shall be taken off the study treatments.  If that scan is stable when 
compared to the prior scan, then pseudoprogression will be noted and treatment will continue.  
If a subject whose scan is concerning for progression also develops substantial neurological 
decline, or requires increasing steroid dose beyond the daily limit of 8mg dexamethasone for 
more than 4 weeks, then no confirmatory scan is needed; progression will be noted and that 
subject shall be discontinued from the study treatments. Similarly, no confirmatory scan is 
needed if a subject develops MRI changes concerning for progression with or without 
substantial neurological decline after 6 months of initiating TTFields therapy.  
 
Reporting of Adverse Events 
Evaluation of Safety 
Analyses will be performed for all patients having received at least one day of TTField therapy.  
The study will use the CTCAE v5.0 for reporting of non-hematologic adverse events and 
modified criteria for hematologic adverse events, see Section 7a (Subject assessments for 
evaluation of safety and tolerability). 
There will not be a formal Study Chair. There will be three DSMC members who will share the 
responsibility of monitoring study conduct and safety across participating sites.  

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 50 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Definitions of Adverse Events 
Adverse Event 
An adverse event (also known as an adverse experience) is defined as any untoward medical 
occurrence associated with the use of a medical device in humans, whether or not considered 
device related.  More specifically, an adverse event (can be any unfavorable and unintended 
sign (e.g., an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the 
use of a device, without any judgment about causality.  An adverse event can arise from any 
use of the device (e.g., off-label use, use in combination with another treatment or drug).  
Adverse reaction 
An adverse reaction is defined as any adverse event caused by the use of a medical device.  
Adverse reactions are a subset of all suspected adverse reactions for which there is reason to 
conclude that the device use caused the event. 
Suspected  
A suspected adverse reaction is defined as any adverse event for which there is a reasonable 
possibility that the use of the device caused the adverse event. For the purposes of IDE safety 
reporting, “reasonable possibility” indicates that there is evidence to suggest a causal 
relationship between the device use and the adverse event.  A suspected adverse reaction 
implies a lesser degree of certainty about causality than an adverse reaction. 
Unexpected  
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered unexpected if it is not listed in the 
investigator brochure or package insert(s), or is not listed at the specificity or severity that has 
been observed, or, if an investigator brochure is not required or available, is not consistent with 
the risk information described in the general investigational plan or elsewhere in the current 
application.  
Adverse events that would be anticipated to occur as part of the disease process are considered 
unexpected for the purposes of reporting because they would not be listed in the investigator 
brochure.  For example, a certain number of non-acute deaths in a cancer trial would be 
anticipated as an outcome of the underlying disease, but such deaths would generally not be 
listed as a suspected adverse reaction in the investigator brochure. 
Serious 
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered serious if, in the view of either 
the investigator or sponsor, it results in any of the following outcomes:  
• Death 
• Life-threatening adverse event 
• Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization 
• A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct 
normal life function 
• Congenital anomaly/birth defect 
Important medical events that may not result in death, are life-threatening, or require 
hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, 
they may jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 51 of 64 
Confidential 
 
prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.  Examples of such medical events include 
allergic bronchospasm requiring intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home, blood 
dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in inpatient hospitalization, or the development of 
drug dependency or drug abuse. 
Life-threatening 
An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered life-threatening if, in the view of 
either the investigator or sponsor, its occurrence places the patient or subject at immediate risk 
of death. It does not include an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that, had it 
occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death.  
Recording of an Adverse Event 
All grade 3 and above adverse events will be entered into the CTMS, Velos, whether or not the 
event is believed to be associated with use of the study device.  Data about these events and 
their severity will be recorded using the NCI CTCAE v5.0.   
All SAEs will be reviewed by a DSMC, which will consist of a panel of experts in oncology, neuro-
oncology, biostatistics, or radiation oncology who are not direct investigators in this study.  The 
PI will identify members of the DSMC and receive feedback and recommendations from the 
DSMC as to the safety of continuing the trial.  The PI and study manager will be responsible for 
facilitating the proceedings as non-committee members. The committee will meet twice a year, 
or more if needed.    
The Investigator will assess all adverse events, assign attribution of the possible association of 
the event with use of the investigational device, and this information will be entered into CTMS 
(Velos) using the classification system listed below:  
Relationship  
Attribution  
Description  
Unrelated to 
investigational 
drug/intervention 
Unrelated 
The AE is clearly NOT related to the 
intervention  
Unlikely 
The AE is doubtfully related to the 
intervention  
Related to investigational 
drug/intervention 
Possible 
The AE may be related to the intervention  
Probable 
The AE is likely related to the intervention  
Definite 
The AE is clearly related to the intervention  
 
A more detailed definition of possible attributions is denoted in the following table: 
Unrelated:  
 
The event is clearly related to an event that may be due to 
environmental or accidental occurrence or other factors such as the 
subject’s clinical state, therapeutic interventions, or concomitant drugs 
administered to the subject.  

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 52 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Unlikely  
The event is most likely produced by other factors such as the subject’s 
clinical condition, therapeutic interventions, or concomitant drugs 
administered to the subject, and does not follow a known response 
pattern to the study drug or device.  
Possible  
The event follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of 
drug administration or use of device, and/or follows a known response 
pattern to the study drug or device, but could have been produced by 
other factors such as the subject's clinical condition, therapeutic 
interventions, or concomitant drugs administered to the subject.  
Probable  
 
The event follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of 
drug administration or use of device, and follows a known response 
pattern to the study drug or device, and cannot be reasonably explained 
by other factors such as the subject's clinical condition, therapeutic 
interventions, or concomitant drugs administered to the subject.  
Definite  
  
The event follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of 
drug administration or use of device, and follows a known response 
pattern to the study drug or device, and cannot be reasonably explained 
by other factors such as the subject's clinical condition, therapeutic 
interventions, or concomitant drugs administered to the subject, and 
either occurs immediately following study drug administration or use of 
device or improves on stopping the study drug or device, or reappears 
on repeat exposure  
 
The relationship of the adverse event to the study treatment must be specified using the 
following definitions:  
Signs or symptoms reported as adverse events will be graded and recorded by the Investigator 
according to the CTCAE.  When specific adverse events are not listed in the CTCAE they will be 
graded by the Investigator as none, mild, moderate or severe according to the following grades 
and definitions: 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 53 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Grade 0 
No AE (or within normal limits) 
Grade 1 
Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; 
intervention not indicated 
Grade 2 
Moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention (e.g., packing, cautery) 
indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) 
Grade 3: 
Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; 
hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting 
self-care ADL 
Grade 4: 
Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated 
Grade 5: 
Death related to AE 
Follow-up of Adverse Events 
All adverse events will be followed with appropriate medical management until resolved.  
Patients discontinued from study therapy for unacceptable adverse events will be followed 
until resolution or stabilization of the adverse event and to the end of the study.  For selected 
adverse events for which administration of the investigational device was stopped, a re-
challenge of the subject with the investigational device may be conducted if considered both 
safe and ethical by the Investigator. 
Adverse Events Monitoring  
The Principal Investigator will review all adverse events and determine reportability to the 
DSMC and Providence’s Institutional Review Board IIRB) per IRBAE reporting criteria; and, when 
the study is conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE), to the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) if it meets the FDA reporting criteria. 
After the first 6 patients complete the lead-in phase, a written report will be submitted to the 
DSMC members describing the cohort, adverse events, and any Dose Limiting Toxicities 
observed, in accordance with the protocol.  The report will be reviewed by the DSMC.  Approval 
for the expansion cohort must be obtained from the DSMC prior to implementation.  
Expedited Reporting  
Reporting to the Data and Safety Monitoring Board 
If a death occurs during the treatment phase of the study or within 30 days after the last 
administration of the study device and it is determined to be related either to the study device 
or to a study procedure, the Investigator or his/her designee must notify the PI, Ricky Chen, 
MD, or designee, Regulatory Manager, Mark Schuster, within 1 business day of knowledge of 
the event.  The contact may be by phone or e-mail.  Death due to disease progression need not 
be reported to the PI or designee.  
Reporting to Institutional Review Board 
The Principal Investigator must report events meeting the IRB definition of “Unanticipated 
Problem” (UP) within 5 business days of his/her awareness of the event.  
Expedited Reporting to the Food and Drug Administration 
If the study is being conducted under an IDE, the Sponsor-Investigator is responsible for 
determining whether or not the suspected adverse reaction meets the criteria for expedited 
reporting in accordance with Federal Regulations (21 CFR §312.32).  

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 54 of 64 
Confidential 
 
The Investigator must report in an IDE safety report any suspected adverse reaction that is both 
serious and unexpected.  The Sponsor-Investigator needs to ensure that the event meets all 
three definitions:  
• Suspected adverse reaction  
• Unexpected  
• Serious  
Serious and unexpected AEs must be reported by the investigator to Providence Regional 
Research Regulatory Office and the Study Manager by email at 
amy.greathouse@providence.org and tiffany.gervasi-follmar@providence.org or fax to 503-
215-6547 and 503-216-1039 within 24 hours of the investigator’s knowledge of the event.  
Providence will also report the SAEs to the FDA. 
If the adverse event does not meet all three of the definitions, it should not be submitted as an 
expedited IDE safety report. 
The timeline for submitting an IDE safety report to FDA is no later than 15 calendar days after 
the Investigator determines that the suspected adverse reaction qualifies for reporting (21 CFR 
312.32(c)(1)). MedWatch 3500A (Mandatory Reporting) form is available at: 
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/HowToReport/DownloadForms/default.htm  
Any unexpected fatal or life-threatening suspected adverse reaction will be reported to FDA no 
later than 7 calendar days after the Investigator’s initial receipt of the information (21 CFR 
312.32(c)(2)).  
Any relevant additional information that pertains to a previously submitted IDE safety report 
will be submitted to FDA as a Follow-up IDE Safety Report without delay, as soon as the 
information is available (21 CFR 312.32(d)(2)).  
8. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
Interim analyses of the first and second safety lead-in cohorts will be performed using data 
collected from the beginning of the study to eight weeks following trimodal therapy for each 
patient. Patient characteristics will be summarized using means, standard deviations, medians, 
interquartile ranges, counts, or percentages, as appropriate. Primary endpoints will be 
summarized using counts and percentages of patients who experienced a treatment-related 
adverse event, treatment-related serious adverse event, or DLT for safety and stopping rules. 
 
In the second interim analysis, the percentage of patients with inconclusive MGMT methylation 
status will also be summarized. Patients with inconclusive MGMT methylation status will be 
removed from the final study analysis, so we will use this percentage to assess the number of 
additional patients that need to be recruited to meet our sample size requirement of 30 
patients. For example, if 2 out of 15 patients have an inconclusive MGMT methylation status at 
this stage, we will recruit 4 additional patients to meet the sample size requirement.  
 
Using the intention-to-treat approach, the final analyses will be performed on all patients 
having received at least one day of use from the study device. Patients with an inconclusive 
MGMT methylation status will be excluded. Patient characteristics will be summarized using 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 55 of 64 
Confidential 
 
means, standard deviations, medians, interquartile ranges, counts, or percentages, as 
appropriate.  
 
Primary endpoints will be summarized using counts and percentages of patients who 
experienced a treatment-related adverse event, treatment-related serious adverse event, or 
DLT will be reported overall and by event type following trimodal treatment and 8 weeks 
thereafter to capture any later appearing toxicities. A subgroup evaluation by MGMT 
methylation status (methylated vs unmethylated) will also be performed. 
 
Kaplan Meier survival analyses will be used to analyze the following secondary endpoints: 1) 
progression-free survival at 6 months and 2 years, 2) median time-to-death and overall survival 
at 2 years and 3) duration of TTF use. Log rank tests may be used in Kaplan Meier analyses to 
test for differences in survival curves amongst known prognostic factors such as age, duration 
and compliance of TTF use, KPS, extent of resection, IDH mutation status, and MGMT 
methylation status. The objective response by modified RANO criteria will be summarized with 
counts and percentages following trimodal treatment and at 2 years. The rate of TTFields 
compliance will be reported as the percentage of patients who used TTFields at least 75% of the 
minimum recommended usage of 18 hours a day on average, as assessed monthly. 
 
The intention-to-treat analyses may be supplemented by per-protocol analyses, if the 
percentage of patients who did not follow standard of care recommendations as outlined for 
adjuvant and maintenance therapy following trimodal treatment is high. 
Power Calculation 
As we are expecting that patients will be more susceptible to skin irritation with concurrent 
therapy than with successive therapy, we focus on severe skin irritation as our endpoint for this 
power calculation. We expect 5% of patients will experience severe skin irritation based on a 
2% rate in the Stupp et al. 2015 study (EF-14)24 which used TTField therapy following initial 
chemoradiation treatment. Assuming a sample size of 30 patients of whom 5% experience 
severe skin irritation, we can say with 95% confidence that the true percentage of patients with 
severe skin irritation is no lower than 2% and no higher than 21% based on a one-sample 
binomial proportion.  Outside of severe skin toxicity, the rate of any adverse event is not 
expected to differ significantly from that established by the EF-14 trial. 
 
9.  AMENDMENTS TO THE CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL 
All protocol amendments will be submitted to the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) when any 
revision is made to the original protocol or subsequent version of the protocol that significantly 
affect the safety of subjects and/or any change is made that significantly affects the scope of 
investigation or scientific quality of the study.   
 
The amended protocol will be reviewed, approved and documented by the same method in 
which the original protocol was reviewed and approved.  

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 56 of 64 
Confidential 
 
 
10. DEVICE ACCOUNTABILITY 
Device accountability is ensured by Novocure through the following procedures: 
• Shipping of clinical devices: SOP-USOC-003 Final release 
• Use of clinical devices : SAP ERP 
• Return of clinical devices : SOP-USOC-006 : Technical support-RMA Process 
 
11. BIBLIOGRAPHY 
1.  
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and 
Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro 
Oncol. 2015;17(suppl 4):iv1-iv62. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov189. 
2.  
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and 
Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987-996. 
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043330. 
3.  
Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, et al. Disruption of cancer cell replication by 
alternating electric fields. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3288-3295. 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15126372. 
4.  
Lee SX, Wong ET, Swanson KD. Disruption of cell division within anaphase by tumor 
treating electric fields (TTFields) leads to immunogenic cell death. Neuro Oncol. 
2013;15(Suppl):iii66-iii67. https://soc-neuro-onc.conference-
services.net/reports/template/onetextabstract.xml?xsl=template/onetextabstract.xsl&c
onferenceID=3676&abstractID=761645. 
5.  
Gera N, Yang A, Holtzman TS, Lee SX, Wong ET, Swanson KD. Tumor treating fields 
perturb the localization of septins and cause aberrant mitotic exit. PLoS One. 
2015;10(5):e0125269. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125269. 
6.  
Giladi M, Schneiderman RS, Voloshin T, et al. Mitotic Spindle Disruption by Alternating 
Electric Fields Leads to Improper Chromosome Segregation and Mitotic Catastrophe in 
Cancer Cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5(November):18046. doi:10.1038/srep18046. 
7.  
Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, et al. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in 
animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 
2007;104(24):10152-10157. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702916104. 
8.  
Pless M, Weinberg U. Tumor treating fields: concept, evidence and future. Expert Opin 
Investig Drugs. 2011;20(8):1099-1106. 
9.  
Schneiderman R, Giladi M, Porat Y, et al. TTFields reduce cancer cell clonogenic potential 
through abnormal chromosome segregation during mitosis. Cancer Res. 2014;74; 5521. 
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/74/19_Supplement/5521.short. 
10.  
Lee SX, Wong ET, Swanson KD. Mitosis Interference of Cancer Cells by NovoTTF-100A 
Causes Decreased Cellular Viability. Cancer Res. 2013;73; 709. 
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/73/8_Supplement/709.abstract. 
11.  
Giladi M, Munster M, Schneiderman RS, et al. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Sensitize 
Glioma Tumor Cells to Radiation Therapy by Delaying DNA Damage Repair Through 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 57 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Homologous Recombination. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2015;93(3):E524-E525. 
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.1888. 
12.  
Munster M, Cahal S, Blatt R, et al. Preclinical evaluation of irradiation through tumor 
treating fields (TTFields) ceramic transducer arrays. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(suppl 
5):v196.3-v196. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov231.07. 
13.  
Schneiderman RS, Voloshin T, Giladi M, et al. p53 status dependence of tumor treating 
fields (TTFields) efficacy against glioma cancer cells. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(suppl 5):v23.3-
v23. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov204.25. 
14.  
Schneiderman RS, Shteingauz A, Giladi M, et al. Tumor treating fields (TTFields) reduce 
migration and invasion properties of human glioma cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Res. 
2016;76(14 Supplement):5078-5078. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2016-5078. 
15.  
Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, et al. Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields 
Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma. JAMA. 2015;314(23):2535. 
doi:10.1001/jama.2015.16669. 
16.  
Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, et al. NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice 
chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A randomised phase III trial of a novel 
treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(14):2192-2202. 
17.  
Mrugala MM, Engelhard HH, Dinh Tran D, et al. Clinical practice experience with 
NovoTTF-100A system for glioblastoma: The Patient Registry Dataset (PRiDe). Semin 
Oncol. 2014;41 Suppl 6:S4-S13. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.010. 
18.  
Zhu J, Pannullo S, Mehdorn M, et al. Quality of Life , Cognitive Function and Functional 
Status in the EF-14 Trial : a Prospective , Multi-center Trial of Tumor Treating Fields 
Together With Temozolomide Compared to Temozolomide Alone in Patients with Newly 
Diagnosed GBM. Sub to SNO. 2015. 
19. 
Kim EH, Kim YH, Song HS, et al. Biological effect of an alternating electric field on cell 
proliferation and synergistic antimitotic effect in combination with ionizing radiation.  
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 20;7(38):62267-62279. 
20. 
Karanam NK, Srinivasan K, Ding L, et al.  Tumor-treating fields elicit a conditional 
vulnerability to ionizing radiation via the downregulation of BRCA1 signaling and reduced 
DNA double-strand break repair capacity in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.  Cell 
Death Dis. 2017 Mar 30;8(3):e2711.  
21. 
Wainwright DA, Chang AL, Dey M, et al. Durable therapeutic efficacy utilizing 
combinatorial blockade against IDO, CTLA-4, and PD-L1 in mice with brain tumors. 
Clinical Cancer Research. 2014;20(20):5290-5301. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0514. 
22.  
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, barbara F. Radiotherapy plus 
Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. New England Journal of 
Medicine. 2005;352(10):987-996. 
23.  
Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, et al. NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice 
chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A randomised phase III trial of a novel 
treatment modality. European Journal of Cancer. 2012;48(14):2192-2202. 
doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. 
24.  
Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, et al. Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields 
Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma. JAMA. 2015;314(23):2535-

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 58 of 64 
Confidential 
 
2539. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.16669. 
25.  
Stupp R, Idbaih A, Steinberg DM, et al. LTBK-01: Prospective, Multi-Center Phase III Trial 
Of Tumor Treating Fields Together With Temozolomide Compared To Temozolomide 
Alone In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18(suppl 
6):i1-i1. doi:10.1093/neuonc/now260 
26.  
Giladi M, Schneiderman RS, Voloshin T, et al. Mitotic Spindle Disruption by Alternating 
Electric Fields Leads to Improper Chromosome Segregation and Mitotic Catastrophe in 
Cancer Cells. Nature Publishing Group. 2015;5:1-17. doi:10.1038/srep18046. 
27.  
Giladi M, Voloshin T, Shteingauz A. Alternating electric fields (TTFields) induce 
immunogenic cell death resulting in enhanced antitumor efficacy when combined with 
anti-PD-1 therapy. The Journal of Immunology. 2016; 196(1 suppl): 75.26. 
28.  
Giladi M, Munster M, Schneiderman RS, et al. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Sensitize 
Glioma Tumor Cells to Radiation Therapy by Delaying DNA Damage Repair Through 
Homologous Recombination. Radiation Oncology Biology. 2015;93(S):E524-E525. 
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.1888. 
29.  
Hudson F, Coulshed D, D'Souza E, Baker C. Effect of radiation therapy on the latest 
generation of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A systematic 
review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 2010;54(1):53-61. 
doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02138.x 
30.  
Gossman M. Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving 
implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-de fibrillators. Journal of applied 
clinical medical physics. 2010;11(1):1-13. 
31.  
Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F, et al. Disease progression or pseudoprogression after 
concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro-Oncology. 
2008;10(3):361-367. doi:10.1215/15228517-2008-008. 
32.  
Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. Updated Response Assessment Criteria for 
High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. Journal 
of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(11):1963-1972. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541 
 
  
 
 
 
Acknowledgements: 
 
We are grateful for the efforts of the following contributors to this work: Lindsay Lucas for her 
work as biostatistician for this protocol.  UCSF neuro-oncology research site committee for their 
thorough review and suggestions in the initial protocol. Chiayi Chen, Tiffany Gervasi-Follmar, 
and Mark Schuster contributed helpful suggestions, questions, and clarifications in the revision 
process. Jessica Wallace provided copy editing support.   
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 59 of 64 
Confidential 
 
12. SIGNATURE PAGE 
 
Investigator Name (Print): ________________________________________________________ 
Study Site Name (Print):  _________________________________________________________ 
Study Site Address (Print):  ________________________________________________________ 
Investigator Signature: ___________________________________Date: ___________________ 
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 60 of 64 
Confidential 
 
13. APPENDICES  
 
Appendix 1 
Performance Status Criteria 
ECOG Performance Status Scale 
Karnofsky Performance Scale 
Grade 
Descriptions 
Percent 
Description 
0 
Normal activity 
Fully active, able to carry on all 
pre-disease performance 
without restriction 
100 
Normal, no complaints, no evidence 
of disease 
90 
Able to carry on normal activity; 
minor signs or symptoms of disease 
1 
Symptoms, but ambulatory 
Restricted in physically 
strenuous activity, but 
ambulatory and able to carry 
out work of a light or sedentary 
nature (e.g., light housework, 
office work) 
80 
Normal activity with effort; some 
signs or symptoms of disease 
70 
Cares for self, unable to carry on 
normal activity or to do active work 
2 
In bed < 50% of the time 
Ambulatory and capable of all 
self-care, but unable to carry 
out any work activities 
Up and about more than 50% of 
waking hours 
60 
Requires occasional assistance, but 
is able to care for most of his/her 
needs 
50 
Requires considerable assistance 
and frequent medical care 
3 
In bed > 50% of the time 
Capable of only limited self-
care, confined to bed or chair 
more than 50% of waking hours 
40 
Disabled, requires special care and 
assistance 
30 
Severely disabled, hospitalization 
indicated 
Death not imminent 
4 
100% bedridden 
Completely disabled 
Cannot carry on any self-care 
Totally confined to bed or chair 
20 
Very sick, hospitalization indicated 
Death not imminent 
10 
Moribund, fatal processes 
progressing rapidly 
5 
Dead 
0 
Dead 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 61 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Appendix 2 
Acceptable Method of Birth Control 
Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) and men able to father a child must agree to use 
highly effective contraception while on study treatment and for 60 days after the last dose of 
temozolomide or Optune™ use. WOCBP must have a negative pregnancy test within 28 days of 
initiation of study treatment. (Note: The effects of the temozolomide and Optune™ on the 
developing human fetus are unknown; thus, WOCBP and men able to father a child must agree 
to use 2 highly effective contraception methods). Highly effective contraception is defined as a 
method with a failure rate of less than 1 % per year, including but not limited to: 
a.    True Abstinence: When this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of 
the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, post-ovulation 
methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception. 
b.    Postmenopausal:  Natural, spontaneous amenorrhea with an appropriate 
clinical profile for ≥1 year.  
c.    Female Sterilization: Surgical bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or tubal 
ligation at least six weeks prior. 
d.     Male Sterilization (provided the partner has received appropriate medical 
confirmation of the surgical success of the vasectomy). For female subjects on 
the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that 
participant. 
e.    Use of a combination of any two of the following: 
1.    Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system 
(IUS) 
2.    Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap 
(diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal 
foam/gel/film/cream/vaginal suppository 
f.   Appropriate hormonal contraceptives (including any registered and marketed 
contraceptive agent that contains an estrogen and/or a progestational agent – 
including oral, subcutaneous, intrauterine, or intramuscular agents)

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 62 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Appendix 3 
Study Calendar 
Procedure/Visit 
Pre-Study 
Study Period (extends 8 weeks post RT/TMZ for DLT monitoring)  
Long-Term Follow-up 
Any time during 
Study Period 
Any time during 
Study Period 
Pre-Consent 
  
Screening 
Trimodal Therapy 
(6-7 weeks) 
Post RT/TMZ 
(4 weeks) 
Adjuvant TMZ Therapy  
 (Cycles are 28 days each) 
Adjuvant TMZ 
Therapy Cycles 
3-6 and beyond, 
if applicable  
Maintenance 
TTField TherapyL 
UNS Visit 
ET Phone Visit 
Day -21 to 0 
Day 1 
Day 8 +7 days; 
Day 15, 22, 29, 
36, 43  
±7 days for each 
 Day 64  
±7 days 
Cycle 1 
(First cycle 1 begins on 
Day 78 ±5 days) 
Cycle 2 
(First cycle 2 begins 
on Day 106  ±5 days) 
 Minimum of 4 
additional cycles  
Up to 2 years  
(Day 720 ±30 
days) 
Day 1 to Day 
106 ±5 days 
Day 1 to Day 
106 ±5 days 
Day 1 
±5 days 
Day 22 
±3 days 
Day 1 
±5 days 
Day 180, 360, 540, 720  ±30 days 
(review/collect data via chart review/and or 
phone contact) 
Tumor Resection or Biopsy  
XDD 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Informed Consent 
  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Demographics 
  
XI 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Eligibility Review 
  
X 
X  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Medical History 
  
X  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Treatment History/Toxicity 
Assessment 
 
XM 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Disease Assessment/Extent of 
Measurable Disease 
  
XD 
 
  
  
XP 
  
XP, EE 
 -------------------------XP, CC-------------------------- 
 
 
Vital SignsQ 
  
XA 
X 
  
X 
X 
  
X 
  
 
 
XGG 
 
Physical Exam 
  
XB 
XB, H 
  
XK 
XK 
  
XK 
  
 
 
XGG 
 
Neuro Exam 
 
X 
 
XX 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
XGG 
 
KPS 
  
X 
X 
  
  
X 
  
X 
  
 
 
XGG 
 
Objective Response 
  
  
  
  
  
X 
  
XEE  
 -------------------------XCC---------------------------- 
XGG 
 
CBC w/diff & Platelet Count 
  
X 
XU 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
  
 
XGG 
 
Blood ChemistryS 
  
X 
XU 
  
  
X 
  
X 
  
  
 
XGG 
 
Confirm MGMT Testing 
  
XR 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Documentation of IDH status 
 
XR 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Coagulation AssessmentT 
  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Serum or Urine Preg Test 
  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
ECG 
  
XW 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
MRI of the Brain w/wo 
ContrastO 
XF 
 
  
  
  
X HH 
  
  
  
  
XGG, HH 
 
Review of Imaging for 
Treatment Planning 
  
XC 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Seizure & Headache 
AssessmentJ 
  
X 
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Radiation Oncology Planning 
  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 63 of 64 
Confidential 
 
Device Specialist 
  
 
XG 
X 
  
------------------- X--------------------- 
 
 
XGG 
 
TTField Compliance ReviewFF 
 
  
X 
X 
  
-------------------- X -------------------- 
----------------------------X---------------------------- 
XGG 
X 
TTField Therapy 
  
  
XG 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
----------------------------X---------------------------- 
XGG 
 
Radiation Therapy (RT) 
  
  
XG 
XBB 
 
  
  
  
  
   
 
XGG 
 
Temozolomide (TMZ) 
  
  
XG 
XBB 
  
XV 
  
X 
  
   
 
XGG 
 
Skin Exam 
  
  
X 
XN, HH 
XN, HH 
XN, Y, HH 
  
XN, Y, HH 
  
 
XGG, HH 
 
Con meds 
  
XE 
---------------------------------------------------X----------------------------------------------------- 
  
  
  
XGG 
X 
Adverse EventsAA 
  
-------------------------------------------------------------X------------------------------------------------------------- 
   
   
 
XGG 
X 
Survival Documentation 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
---------------------------XZ---------------------------- 
 
 

FINAL Version 4.0 
Protocol UNITYGBM01 
Page 64 of 64 
Confidential 
 
 
A: To include height at screening. 
B: Including neurologic exam, head exam, and neck exam. 
C: Must be done within 14 days prior to Day 1.  
D: At screening, to including documented pathology proven glioblastoma or gliosarcoma. 
E: To include medications taken within 7 days of Day 1.  
F: Confirmation of MRI completion within 3 days after tumor resection, with up to 5 additional days logistical delay being acceptable. If biopsy alone without full resection, cranial CT may be used instead of MRI, provided preoperative MRI 
completed within 14 days of biopsy.  
G: TTF must start within 7 days of Day 1 and preferably a few days prior to beginning RT. TMZ must start within 7 days after beginning of RT. RT should be initiated no more than 14 days after Day 1. 
H: To include scalp exam.  
I: To include date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity, and education level. 
J: Documentation of seizure frequency along with type of seizure (generalized of partial) and/or headache severity and frequency. 
K: Including neurological exam, skin exam, and scalp assessment.  
L: Obtained via chart review and by telephone (as needed) every 6 months until study completion.  
M: To include history of prior treatments and any residual toxicity relating to prior treatment. 
N: To include documentation of attribution, grade of toxicity, and if there is apparent correlation with the ceramic disc or adhesive gel on the transducer arrays. 
O: With imaging assessment, status and extent of measurable disease on imaging. Repeat MRI every 2-3 months recommended. 
P: Including clinical response or deterioration. 
Q: Vitals to include: weight, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, and resting blood pressure.  
R: MGMT methylation status and IDH mutation status must be assessed at the study site or patient’s referral center.  MGMT status will be used for stratification purposes but will not exclude patients from this study if they are either 
methylated, unmethylated, or indeterminate, or in process at the time of enrollment.  Similarly, subjects with tumors that are IDH mutated or wildtype are both eligible.  If results of MGMT and/or IDH are in process at time of screening, 
review at each subsequent visit until resulted. 
S: To include alkaline phosphatase, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, calcium,  blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total protein, albumin, fasting glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate.  
T: To include PT, PTT, and INR.  
U:  If completed for screening within 14 days of Day 1, does not need to be repeated. 
V: Cycle 1 day 1 dose is 150mg/m2/day, all other cycles dose is 200mg/m2/day.   
W: To be collected and read by cardiology department.  
X: To be done at Day 22 and Day 43 only.  
Y: Day 1 of the first 2 cycles of adjuvant therapy will fall within the DLT window with continued skin exams (Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1).  The subsequent cycles with post-TMZ maintenance TTField therapy will proceed per the standard 
of care (minimum of 6 cycles, up to 2 years). For continued participation in the trial, patients must continue to follow up every 2-3 months with a repeat MRI of the brain. 
Z: To include PFS and OS. 
AA Monitor adverse events through 8 weeks post-RT/TMZ (through Day 1 of first cycle of Cycle 2). 
BB: To be stopped post Day 43 visit on Day 49 (+ 7 days, if clinically appropriate). 
CC: To be assessed if MRI completed per SOC since last review/contact.  
DD: Time that must have elapsed prior to study enrollment (Day 1): 3-6 weeks (21-42 days) from time of definitive surgery or 2-4 weeks (14-28 days) from the time of biopsy for those who were only able to safely have a biopsy and not full 
resection. 
EE: Use MRI from Day 1 Cycle 1 for assessment. 
FF: To be completed monthly, may not be available at each visit.  
GG: If indicated, per investigator discretion.  
HH:  Transducer arrays will need to be removed/replaced to complete.  
*Please note, the above notations can be found in the body of the protocol, but are listed here as well with the intent of making the study calendar easier to follow.