PersAFOne III: Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus - PersAF in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Phase: NA
Conditions: Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor: Boston Scientific Corporation

Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 1 of 76 
 
 
 
 
 
PersAFOne III: 
Feasibility Study of the 
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus - PersAF in the 
Treatment of 
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation 
 
 
 
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION PLAN (CIP) NUMBER: CS1543 REVISION C 
 
 
 
SPONSOR: 
FARAPULSE, INC. 
3715 HAVEN AVE. SUITE 110 
MENLO PARK, CA 94025 
USA 
 
 
 
 
ISSUE DATE: 25 OCTOBER 2022 
 
 
This document contains confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied or reproduced in 
whole or in part without the express written permission of FARAPULSE, INC., MENLO PARK, CA. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 2 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 2 of 76 
 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
PRIMARY STUDY CONTACTS .............................................................................................. 7 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 9 
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................... 16 
1. 
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 18 
1.1 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE .......................................................... 18 
1.2 
IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION (IRE) ........................................... 18 
1.3 
SUMMARY OF FARAPULSE CLINICAL STUDIES .................................. 19 
1.3.1 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES–THE IMPULSE STUDY ................ 19 
1.3.2 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES – THE PEFCAT STUDY ................. 20 
1.3.3 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES - THE PEFCAT II STUDY .............. 20 
1.3.4 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES – THE PERSAFONE STUDY ........... 21 
1.3.5 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES – THE PERSAFONE II STUDY ........ 21 
1.3.6 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES – THE PERSAFONE III STUDY ....... 22 
1.3.7 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES – THE FARA-FREEDOM STUDY .... 23 
1.3.8 ENDOCARDIAL ABLATION STUDIES – THE FARA-FREE STUDY ........... 23 
1.4 
RATIONALE FOR CONDUCTING THIS FEASIBILITY STUDY ...................... 23 
2. 
INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICES .................................................................................... 25 
2.1 
NAMES OF INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICES ............................................... 25 
2.2 
INTENDED USE ................................................................................. 25 
2.3 
CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................... 25 
2.4 
FARAPULSE PULSED FIELD ABLATION SYSTEM PLUS-PERSAF ......... 25 
1. 
ABLATION CATHETER ................................................................................ 26 
2. 
CONNECTION CABLE .................................................................................. 26 
2.4.1 FARAWAVE PULSED FIELD ABLATION CATHETER ............................ 28 
2.4.2 FARAPOINT PULSED FIELD ABLATION CATHETER ........................... 29 
2.4.3 FARASTAR PULSED FIELD ABLATION GENERATOR AND RECORDING 
SYSTEM MODULE ................................................................................. 30 
2.4.4 FARADRIVE STEERABLE SHEATH ................................................................... 31 
2.5 
DEVICE ACCOUNTABILITY .................................................................. 32 
2.6 
RETURN OF DEVICES ........................................................................ 33 
3. 
STUDYDESIGN .......................................................................................................... 34 
3.1 
STUDY OBJECTIVE ........................................................................... 34 
3.2 
STUDY OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 34 
3.3 
SUBJECT CONFIDENTIALITY ............................................................... 34 
3.4 
WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT .......................................................... 34 
3.5 
STUDY ENTRY CRITERIA ................................................................... 35 
3.5.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA ............................................................................ 35 
3.5.2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA ........................................................................... 35 
3.6 
ENROLLMENT .................................................................................. 37 
3.7 
SAMPLE SIZE ................................................................................... 37 
3.8 
INVESTIGATIONAL SITES ................................................................... 37 
3.9 
DURATION OF SUBJECT PARTICIPATION .............................................. 37 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 3 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 3 of 76 
 
 
3.10 SUBJECT COMPLETION OR WITHDRAWAL ........................................... 38 
3.10.1 STUDY COMPLETION ............................................................................. 38 
3.10.2 VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL ................................................................. 38 
3.10.3 INVESTIGATOR INITIATED WITHDRAWAL .............................................. 38 
3.10.4 DOCUMENTATION ................................................................................. 38 
3.10.5 CONTINUING MEDICAL CARE ............................................................... 38 
3.10.6 LOST TO FOLLOW-UP............................................................................ 38 
3.11 PROCEDURES .................................................................................. 39 
3.11.1 INDEX PROCEDURE ............................................................................... 39 
3.11.2 60-DAY REMAP PROCEDURE ................................................................ 40 
3.11.3 BLANKING PERIOD ................................................................................ 40 
3.11.4 ARRHYTHMIA CORE LAB ...................................................................... 41 
3.12 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS AND ASSESSMENTS ........................................ 41 
3.12.1 BASELINE ..................................................................................................................... 41 
3.12.2 INDEX PROCEDURE ............................................................................... 42 
3.12.3 PRE-DISCHARGE ........................................................................................................ 42 
3.12.4 30-DAY VISIT ............................................................................................................. 42 
3.12.5 60-DAYVISIT AND REMAPPINGPROCEDURE .......................................... 43 
3.12.6 6-MONTHVISIT .......................................................................................................... 44 
3.12.7 12-MONTHVISIT ........................................................................................................ 44 
3.12.8 UNSCHEDULED VISITS .......................................................................... 45 
3.13 SCHEDULE OF STUDY ASSESSMENTS ................................................. 46 
4. 
BENEFIT RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 47 
4.1 
POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS ........................................................... 47 
4.2 
POTENTIAL RISKS ............................................................................ 48 
4.3 
POTENTIAL BENEFITS ....................................................................... 49 
5. 
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND REPORTING ............................................................... 50 
5.1 
GENERAL STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................... 50 
5.2 
CONTROL OF SYSTEMATIC ERROR AND BIAS ...................................... 50 
5.3 
SAMPLE SIZE JUSTIFICATION ............................................................. 50 
5.4 
SUBJECT DISPOSITION ...................................................................... 51 
5.5 
IMPUTATION FOR MISSING DATA ........................................................ 51 
5.6 
POPULATIONS FOR ANALYSIS ............................................................ 51 
5.7 
FINAL CLINICAL REPORT ................................................................... 51 
6. 
OUTCOME MEASURES ............................................................................................. 52 
6.1 
PRIMARY SAFETY ENDPOINT ............................................................. 52 
6.2 
SECONDARY SAFETY ENDPOINTS ...................................................... 53 
6.3 
PRIMARY FEASIBILITY ENDPOINT ....................................................... 53 
6.4 
SECONDARY FEASIBILITY ENDPOINTS ................................................ 53 
6.5 
ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS ............................................................... 54 
6.6 
PROCEDURAL ASSESSMENTS ............................................................ 54 
7. 
ADVERSE EVENTS, DEVICE EFFECTS, MALFUNCTIONS AND DEFICIENCIES 
(DEFINITIONS FROM ISO 14155:2020) .............................................................................. 55 
7.1 
ADVERSE EVENTS ............................................................................ 55 
7.2 
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS .............................................................. 55 
7.3 
DEVICE EFFECTS ............................................................................. 55 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 4 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 4 of 76 
 
 
7.3.1 ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECTS ................................................................... 55 
7.3.2 SERIOUS ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECTS ..................................................... 56 
7.3.3 UNANTICIPATED SERIOUS ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECTS .......................... 56 
7.4 
DEVICE DEFICIENCIES ...................................................................... 56 
7.5 
USE ERRORS .................................................................................. 56 
7.6 
MALFUNCTIONS ............................................................................... 57 
7.7 
CAUSALITY RELATIONSHIP (DEFINITIONS FROM MDCG 2020-10/1) ...... 57 
7.8 
REPORTING ..................................................................................... 58 
8. 
MONITORING ............................................................................................................ 60 
9. 
STUDY MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................. 62 
9.1 
KEY CONTRIBUTORS ........................................................................ 62 
9.1.1 STUDY SPONSOR ................................................................................... 62 
9.1.2 CRO ...................................................................................................... 62 
9.1.3 ARRHYTHMIA CORE LAB ....................................................................... 62 
9.2 
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................... 62 
9.2.1 STUDY CONDUCT .................................................................................. 63 
9.2.2 ETHICS REVIEW ..................................................................................... 63 
9.2.3 INFORMED CONSENT ............................................................................. 63 
9.2.4 COVERAGE OF EXPENSES ...................................................................... 63 
9.2.5 CONFIDENTIALITY ................................................................................. 63 
9.3 
INSURANCE ..................................................................................... 64 
9.4 
AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS ................................................................. 64 
9.5 
SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................. 64 
9.6 
MONITOR RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................. 65 
9.7 
INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES ...................................................... 66 
9.8 
INVESTIGATOR TRAINING .................................................................. 67 
9.9 
SITE TRAINING ................................................................................. 67 
9.10 CLINICAL EVENTS AND DATA MONITORING COMMITTEE ....................... 68 
9.11 DATA MANAGEMENT ......................................................................... 68 
9.12 STUDY SUSPENSION OR EARLY TERMINATION ..................................... 68 
9.13 CRITERIA FOR SUSPENDING/ TERMINATING A STUDY CENTER............... 69 
9.14 DEVIATIONS FROM THE CLINICAL INVESTIGATION PLAN ........................ 69 
10. 
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................. 70 
10.1 MAINTAINING RECORDS .................................................................... 70 
10.2 DATA HANDLING AND RECORD KEEPING ............................................ 70 
10.2.1 SOURCE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................ 70 
10.2.2 DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................ 70 
10.3 ETHICS COMMITTEE AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY APPROVAL .............. 71 
10.4 PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THE CIP ................................................ 71 
THE PROCESS OF AMENDING THE CIP AND/OR RELATED DOCUMENTS IS THE 
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SPONSOR. THE PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THE 
CIP SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS ................................................................................. 71 
10.5 DEVICE ACCOUNTABILITY .................................................................. 72 
11. 
PUBLICATION POLICY .............................................................................................. 73 
12. 
BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... 74 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 5 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 5 of 76 
 
 
 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 6 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 6 of 76 
 
 
 
LIST OF TABLES 
 
Table 1. 
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF – Components ... 26 
Table 2. 
CE Marked Devices Utilized in Conjunction with FARAPULSE System ..... 27 
Table 3. 
Summary of Study Assessments ..................................................................... 46 
Table 4. 
Composite Safety Endpoint Definitions .......................................................... 52 
 
 
 
 
LIST OF FIGURES 
 
Figure 1. FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF Components ................ 27 
Figure 2. Representative Illustration of the FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter ... 28 
Figure 3. Distal section of the FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter ....................... 29 
Figure 5. FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter ......................................................... 30 
Figure 6. FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath ............................................................................... 32 
Figure 7. FARADRIVE Dilator .............................................................................................. 32 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 7 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 7 of 76 
 
 
Primary Study Contacts 
 
SPONSOR 
FARAPULSE, Inc. 
3715 Haven Ave. Suite 110 
Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA 
Tel: +1 650 422 3633 
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR 
Pr. Petr Neuzil 
Nemocnice Na Homolce 
Roentgenova 2 
Prague 150 30 
CzechRepublic 
Tel: +420 257 272 211 
CLINICAL RESEARCH 
ORGANIZATION 
ICON Clinical Research Ltd 
South County Business Park 
Leopardstown 
Dublin 18D18 X5R3 
Ireland 
Tel: +353 12 912000 
Fax: +353 12 476260 
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE 
ICON(LR) Limited 
South County Business Park 
Leopardstown 
Dublin 18D18 X5R3 
Ireland 
Tel: +353 12 912000 
Fax: +353 12 476260 
ECG CORE LAB 
MDT – Medical Data Transfer, s.r.o. 
Zabrdovicka 2, 615 00 Brno 
Czech Republic 
Contact: Veronika Bolkova 
Tel: +420 725 069 195 
iowa@mdtekg.cz 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 8 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 8 of 76 
 
 
Revision History 
 
Revision 
Change Description 
A 
Initial Release 
B 
Addition of coronary assessments (e.g. angiography, FFR, IFR) in either 
left or right coronary artery to assess potential response to PFA 
application at the discretion of the investigator. 
C 
Updated background information. Addition of nitroglycerin 
at 
investigator’s discretion to assess for prophylaxis of coronary spasm. 
Total subjects increased from 60 to 90 patients. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 9 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 9 of 76 
 
 
Executive Summary 
 
SPONSOR NAME: 
FARAPULSE, Inc. 
FULL TITLE OF STUDY: 
Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation 
System Plus – PersAF in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial 
Fibrillation 
SHORT TITLE OF 
STUDY: 
PersAFOne III 
(pronounced per-'se-fa-nē 3) 
PROTOCOL NUMBER: 
CS1543, Revision C 
OBJECTIVE: 
The objective of this safety and feasibility study is to assess 
whether the endocardial creation of electrically nonconductive 
lesions via PEF catheter ablation applied using the FARAPULSE 
Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is a feasible and safe 
treatment for PersAF and associated AFL 
CLINICAL HYPOTHESIS: 
Endocardial creation of electrically nonconductive lesions in 
cardiac tissue via PEF catheter ablation using the FARAPULSE 
Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is a feasible and safe 
treatment for PersAF. 
NAME OF 
INVESTIGATIONAL 
DEVICES: 
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF 
• FARAWAVE™ Pulsed Field Ablation Catheters 
• FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
• FARASTAR™ Pulsed Field Generator (and accessories) 
• FARADRIVE™ Steerable Sheath 
STUDY OVERVIEW: 
This is a prospective, multi-center safety and feasibility study in 
subjects with persistent AF. Subjects will undergo percutaneous 
PEF ablation for pulmonary vein isolation as well as cavotricuspid 
isthmus interruption and other left atrial ablations at the 
investigator’s discretion. Subjects will then be followed at 30 
days, 60 ± 15 days, 6 months and 12 months for adverse events, 
recurrence of arrhythmia after a 90 day blanking period and other 
relevant outcome measures. 
STUDY POPULATION 
Subjects with documented symptomatic persistent AF (AF 
duration 7 – 365 days) and a 24-hour Holter monitor showing 
continuous AF within 90 days prior to the enrollment date; who 
are refractory or intolerant to at least one Class I/III antiarrhythmic 
agent. 
PLANNED 
ENROLLMENT: 
Up to 90 subjects 
CLINICAL SITES: 
Up to 4 clinical sites in Europe 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 10 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 10 of 76 
 
 
 
DURATION OF 
PARTICIPATION: 
Subjects will be followed at 30 days, 60 days, 6 months and 12 
months with a 90-day Blanking Period for recurrent atrial 
fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia following the Index 
Procedure. 
Reablation with the study device(s) during the Blanking Period is 
permitted but does not extend either the Blanking Period or the total 
follow-up interval. 
The enrollment period is estimated to take 15 months and subjects 
will be followed for up to 12 months. The total study duration will 
be approximately 27 months. 
PLANNED PROCEDURE: 
Index Procedure: 
• Subjects will undergo an attempt to isolate all pulmonary veins 
or their anatomic equivalent. 
• Subjects with a past history of atrial flutter, who are at risk of 
atrial flutter, who present with atrial flutter during the Index 
Procedure or who have inducible cavotricuspid isthmus- 
mediated (typical) flutter may undergo ablation of the cavo- 
tricuspid isthmus at the discretion of the investigator. 
• Additional left atrial lesions may be made at the discretion of 
the investigator including focal sites, electrical gaps and lines of 
isolation. 
• At the investigator’s discretion coronary assessments (e.g. 
angiography, FFR, IFR) may be made in either left or right 
coronary artery to assess potential response to PFA application. 
• At investigator’s discretion, in order to assess effect on coronary 
spasm, an angiogram will be performed and intravenous 
nitroglycerin administered, at doses up to 3mg, before, during, 
or after PFA application(s) at the CTI. Routine hemodynamic 
monitoring will be performed. 
Nitroglycerin may be 
administered via intracoronary injection at investigator’s 
discretion. 
60-Day Remap Procedure: 
• Subjects will undergo a remapping procedure at 60 ± 15 days to 
assess the durability of the ablation lesions performed during the 
Index Procedure. 
• During this procedure, additional ablations may be made at the 
discretion of the investigator to optimize patient outcomes. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 11 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 11 of 76 
 
 
 
PRIMARY SAFETY 
ENDPOINT: 
The primary safety endpoint for this study is the Composite Safety 
Endpoint (CSE) defined as the incidence of the following early- 
onset and late-onset serious adverse events (SAEs) which are 
device- or procedure-related, as adjudicated by the CEDMC. (See 
Table 4. Composite Safety Endpoint Definitions in Section 
6.1). 
Early onset (within 30 days of an Index or Remap Procedure) 
- 
Death 
- 
Myocardial infarction (MI) 
- 
Persistent diaphragmatic paralysis 
- 
Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) 
- 
Peripheral or organ thromboembolism 
- 
Pericarditis 
- 
Cardiac tamponade / perforation 
- 
Vascular access complications requiring intervention 
- 
Heart block 
Late onset (any time during follow-up through 12 months) 
- 
Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis (> 70% diameter reduction 
from baseline) 
- 
Atrio-esophageal fistula 
SECONDARY SAFETY 
ENDPOINTS: 
1. The Primary Safety Endpoint assessed at 7 days 
2. The proportion of subjects with a device- or procedure- 
related SAE 
3. The proportion of subjects with stroke or TIA 
4. The proportion of subjects requiring cardioversion 
5. The proportion of subjects requiring an arrhythmia-related 
(AF, AFL or AT) hospitalization 
PRIMARY FEASIBILITY 
ENDPOINT: 
The proportion of subjects that achieve Acute Procedural Success 
(APS) defined as the percutaneous endocardial creation of a 
complete, electrically isolating set of lesions around the ostia of 
the pulmonary veins (PVI) using the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field 
Ablation System Plus-PersAF during the Index Procedure, as 
clinically assessed by entrance and/or exit block performed ≥ 20 
minutes after the last PVI lesion is made. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 12 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 12 of 76 
 
 
 
SECONDARY 
FEASIBILITY 
ENDPOINTS: 
1. The proportion of subjects who undergo the protocol- 
specified 60-Day Remapping Procedure and achieve Chronic 
Procedural Success (CPS) defined as persistent electrical 
isolation of all initially ablated pulmonary veins. Chronic 
Procedural Success will be subdivided by Index Procedure 
only CPS and Reablated CPS subjects. 
2. The proportion of attempted subjects that achieve Acute CTI 
Success, defined as the creation of bi-directional electrical 
block across the cavotricuspid isthmus using the 
investigational devices using the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field 
Ablation System Plus-PersAF during the Index Procedure. 
3. Durability of the CTI and/or other extra-PV lesion set(s), 
when applicable. Durability is defined as unaltered integrity 
of each such lesion assessed at the Remapping Procedure. 
4. The proportion of subjects that achieve Therapeutic Success, 
defined as freedom from: 
a. Post Blanking Period through assessment: occurrence of 
AF, AFL or AT or ablation for AF/AFL/AT using the 
study device 
b. At any time: ablation for AF/AFL/AT with a 
nonstudydevice 
Therapeutic Success will be assessed from the end of the 90- 
day Blanking Period through Months 6 and 12 and will be 
subdivided by on / off AFDs(Atrial Fibrillation Drugs) post- 
Blanking Period. 
ADDITIONAL 
ASSESSMENTS: 
1. Proportion of subjects with early recurrence of atrial 
fibrillation (ERAF) by 90 days after the Index Procedure. 
2. Time to Therapeutic Failure. 
3. Proportion of all ablated pulmonary veins that are isolated at 
the Index Procedure using the study device. 
4. Proportion of all ablated pulmonary veins isolated using the 
study device during the Index Procedure that remain isolated 
at the 60-day remapping procedure. 
5. The proportion of attempted subjects that achieve Chronic 
CTI Success, defined as persistent bi-directional electrical 
block across the CTI assessed at the 60-day Remapping 
Procedure. 
6. The proportion of attempted subjects that achieve Chronic 
Focal Success, defined as persistent electrical 
nonconductivity of all extra-PV tissue targeted for ablation in 
the Index Procedure, excluding the CTI. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 13 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 13 of 76 
 
 
 
PROCEDURAL 
ASSESSMENTS: 
1. Assessments of duration for procedure components 
a. Procedure time (initiation of venous access to 
venous access closure) 
b. Dwell time (sum of catheter entry-to-exit 
durations for each cardiac chamber) 
c. Total ablation time (first ablation to last ablation) 
d. Fluoroscopy time and dose (total duration and 
dose of exposure) 
2. Characterization of lesion sets 
a. PVI ablations 
b. Extra-PV ablations, excluding CTI ablations 
c. CTI ablations 
d. Anomalous PV ablations 
INCLUSION CRITERIA 
Study subjects are required to meet all the following inclusion 
criteria to participate in this study: 
1. Patients with documented drug-resistant symptomatic 
persistent AF meeting all three of the following criteria: 
a. Patient is refractory or intolerant to at least one Class 
I/III antiarrhythmic agent. 
b. ECG-documented first episode of persistent AF, lasting 
longer than 7 days but not longer than 365 days 
c. Holter within 90 days prior to the Enrollment Date 
demonstrating 24 hours of continuous AF 
2. Patients who are ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age on the day of 
enrollment. 
3. Patient participation requirements: 
a. Lives locally 
b. Is willing and capable of providing Informed Consent 
to undergo study procedures 
c. Is willing to participate in all examinations and follow- 
up visits and tests associated with this clinical study. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 14 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 14 of 76 
 
 
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA 
Subjects will be excluded from participating in this study if they 
meet any one of the following exclusion criteria: 
1. AF that is: 
a. Paroxysmal (longest AF episode < 7days) 
b. Longstanding (has persisted > 12 months or that does 
not respond to cardioversion if < 12 months) 
c. Secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, 
alcohol abuse or other reversible / non-cardiac causes 
2. Left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 5.5 cm as documented by 
transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or computed tomography 
(CT) 
3. Any of the following cardiac procedures, implants or 
conditions: 
a. Clinically significant arrhythmias other than AF, AFL or 
AT 
b. Hemodynamically significant valvular disease 
c. Prosthetic heart valve 
d. NYHA Class III or IV CHF 
e. Previous endocardial or epicardial ablation or surgery 
for AF 
f. Atrial or ventricular septal defect closure 
g. Atrial myxoma 
h. Left atrial appendage device or occlusion 
i. Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator or 
cardiac resynchronization therapy devices 
j. Significant or symptomatic hypotension 
k. Bradycardia or chronotropic incompetence 
l. History of pericarditis 
m. History of rheumatic fever 
n. History of congenital heart disease with any residual 
anatomic or conduction abnormality 
4. Any of the following within 3 months prior toenrollment: 
a. Myocardial infarction 
b. Unstable angina 
c. Percutaneous coronary intervention 
d. Heart surgery (e.g. coronary artery bypass grafting, 
ventriculotomy, atriotomy) 
e. Heart failure hospitalization 
f. Stroke or TIA 
g. Clinically significant bleeding 
h. Pericarditis or pericardial effusion 
i. Left atrial thrombus 
5. History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 15 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 15 of 76 
 
 
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA 
(CONTINUED) 
6. Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systemic 
anticoagulation 
7. Contraindications to CT or MRI 
8. Sensitivity to contrast media not controlled by premedication 
9. Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, lactating 
or not using birth control 
10. Medical conditions that would prevent participation in the 
study, interfere with assessment or therapy, significantly 
raise the risk of study participation, or confound data or its 
interpretation, including but not limited to 
a. Body mass index (BMI) > 40 
b. Solid organ or hematologic transplant, or currently being 
evaluated for an organ transplant 
c. Severe lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, or any 
lung disease involving abnormal blood gases or 
significant dyspnea 
d. Renal insufficiency with an estimated creatinine 
clearance <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, or any history of renal 
dialysis or renal transplant 
e. Active malignancy or history of treated cancer within 24 
months of enrollment 
f. Clinically significant gastrointestinal problems 
involving the esophagus, stomach and/or untreated acid 
reflux 
g. Clinically significant infection 
h. Predicted life expectancy less than one year 
11. Clinically significant psychological condition that in the 
investigator’s opinion would prohibit the subject's ability to 
meet the protocol requirements 
12. Current or anticipated enrollment in any other clinical study 
13. Employment by FARAPULSE or the same hospital 
department or office of any investigator, or a family member 
of any of the preceding groups. 
14.  Use of amiodarone after day of index ablation procedure. 
Patients will cease use of amiodarone on or before the date of 
the index ablation procedure. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 16 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 16 of 76 
 
 
Abbreviations and Acronyms 
ACT 
Activated clotting time 
ADE 
Adverse device effect 
AE 
Adverse Event 
AF 
Atrial fibrillation 
AFD 
Atrial Fibrillation Drug 
AFL 
Atrial flutter 
APS 
Acute Procedural Success 
AT 
Atrial tachycardia 
BMI 
Body Mass Index 
CA 
Competent Authority 
CBC 
Complete blood count 
CEDMC Clinical Events and Data Monitoring Committee 
CHA2DS2-VASc 
Termed “CHADS-VASC” a clinical prediction rule for stroke 
CHF 
Congestive heart failure 
CIP 
Clinical Investigation Plan 
CPS 
Chronic Procedural Success 
CRF 
Includes CRF (case report form) and eCRF (electronic case report form) 
CRO 
Clinical research organization 
CSE 
Composite Safety Endpoint 
CT 
Computed tomography 
CTI 
Cavotricuspid isthmus 
DCCV 
Direct current cardioversion 
EC 
Ethics Committee 
ECG 
Electrocardiogram 
ERAF 
Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation 
FFR/IFR Fractional Flow Reserve / Instant Flow Reserve 
ICF 
Informed Consent Form 
INR 
International normalized ratio 
IVC 
Inferior vena cava 
LA 
Left atrium or left atrial 
MI 
Myocardial infarction 
MRI 
Magnetic resonance imaging 
NIHSS 
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 
NTG 
Nitroglycerine 
NYHA 
New York Heart Association 
PAF 
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 
PersAF 
Persistent atrial fibrillation 
PEF 
Pulsed electric field 
PT 
Prothrombin time 
PTT 
Partial thromboplastin time 
PV 
Pulmonary vein 
PVI 
Pulmonary vein isolation 
PVS 
Pulmonary vein stenosis 
SADE 
Serious adverse device effect 
SAE 
Serious adverse event 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 17 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 17 of 76 
 
 
TEE 
Transesophageal echocardiography 
TIA 
Transient ischemic attack 
TTE 
Transthoracic echocardiography 
TTM 
Transtelephonic monitor 
UADE 
Unanticipated adverse device effect 
USADE Unanticipated serious adverse device effect 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 18 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 18 of 76 
 
 
1. Introduction 
1.1 
Background and Rationale 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, affecting 
approximately 2.2 million people in the United States and 4.5 million in the European 
Union.1,2. The incidence increases with advancing age, affecting 6% of the population 
over age 60 and 10% of the population over age 803,4. Age-adjusted population 
trending projects 16 million people in the United States will have AF by 20505. Atrial 
fibrillation remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized 
societies. The annual risk of AF related stroke is 5% per year and one of every six 
strokes diagnosed occurs in the presence of AF.6 Therefore, patients with AF require 
long-term anticoagulation to prevent embolic events. Failure to manage AF may also 
lead to anatomic and electrical remodeling of the left atrium, tachycardia-induced 
cardiomyopathy, and reduced left ventricular function (heart failure). AF remains an 
extremely costly public health burden, with annual per patient cost of care approaching 
€3000 (approximately U.S. $3200).7 
The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2017 Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical 
Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation8defines several different stages of atrial fibrillation. 
• Paroxysmal AF (PAF): AF that terminates spontaneously or with intervention 
within 7 days of onset. 
• Persistent AF (PersAF):continuous AF that is sustained beyond 7 days. 
o Long-standing persistent AF: continuous AF of greater than 12 months’ 
duration. 
o Permanent AF: the presence of [persistent] AF that is accepted by the 
patient and physician, and for which no further attempts to restore or 
maintain sinus rhythm will be undertaken. 
Catheter ablation for the treatment of PAF is increasingly being performed as first line 
therapy for PAF and clinical evidence is accruing that this may well become an 
accepted first line treatment. 
Catheter ablation for the treatment of PersAF is complicated by the heterogeneity of the 
underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and the generally reduced efficacy of 
ablation for continuous AF states. A small study of catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic 
drug treatment of PersAF found a significant advantage of ablation over AFDs.9 While 
no catheter system has received FDA or CE Mark to date for the treatment of PersAF, 
several single arm clinical investigations seeking device approvals for this indication 
are under way. 
1.2 
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) 
Al-Sakere 200710described irreversible electroporation as a non-thermal tissue ablation 
technique in which intense short duration electrical fields are used to permanently open 
pores in cell membranes, thus producing non-thermal tissue ablation. Their study, 
using a mouse model, showed complete regression in 92% of treated tumors. IRE 
ablation has a tissue specific mechanism of ablation. The tissue injury from IRE 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 19 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 19 of 76 
 
 
ablation occurs at the cellular level with loss of homeostasis leading to necrosis or 
apoptosis.11121314IRE ablation typically spares the extracellular matrix, which facilitates 
rapid wound healing.15,16,17,18,19 
Thomson 201120reported a case-series study (N=38) assessing the safety of IRE for 
treating liver, kidney or lung cancers in humans. The first four patients showed signs 
of transient ventricular arrhythmia, so subsequent patients were all treated using 
electrocardiogram (ECG)-synchronized deliver of electroporation pulses. There were 
two further arrhythmias, and two cases of inadvertent damage to neighboring organs. 
68% of tumors were completely ablated. The authors concluded that IRE is safe for 
clinical use, provided ECG-synchronized delivery is used. 
A research group led by FHMWittkampf in Utrecht has been investigating the potential 
effectiveness and safety of epicardial electroporation in AF ablation procedures using 
porcine models. Wittkampf 201121 (N=10) used a circular ablation catheter and 
showed that PVI was achieved in all animals, with no sign of stenosis at 3-week follow 
up. Van Driel 201422 (N=6) confirmed this result out to 3-month follow up. Neven 
201423 (N=5) showed that electroporation lesion depth depended on the level of 
electrical energy applied, reaching 8mm at 300 joules. 
Van Driel 2015 (N=20) showed that electroporation could create deep lesions close to 
the phrenic nerve without damage to the nerve. Neven 2014 similarly showed that 
neighboring coronary arteries were undamaged by electroporation (N= 5). These 
animal studies suggest that irreversible electroporation can safely create deep lesions in 
heart tissue when applied epicardially without harming adjacent tissues. 
1.3 
Summary of FARAPULSE Clinical Studies 
1.3.1 
Endocardial Ablation Studies–The IMPULSE Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. initiated a safety and feasibility study at Na Homolce Hospital in 
Prague, Czech Republic and HopitalCardiologique du Haut-Leveque in Pessac, 
France under the “IMPULSE” Protocol, CS0188. This study is being conducted 
using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Forty (40) patients were 
enrolled between January and December of 2018. Thirty (30) patients were enrolled 
in Prague and ten (10) were enrolled in Bordeaux. All patients were discharged in 
good condition. One patient was treated for tamponade at the conclusion of the Index 
Procedure and the event was resolved. Three patients were re-hospitalized for atrial 
arrhythmia and all of these events were resolved. One patient experienced a 
prolonged index hospitalization due to an arteriovenous groin fistula which was 
resolved. At the conclusion of the index Procedure, all (100%) pulmonary veins 
(PVs) were isolated using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Thirty- 
five (35) patients have returned for the protocol-defined 3-month remapping 
procedure to assess durable PV isolation. In these patients, 70% of PVs remained 
isolated. All PVs in fourteen (14) patients remained isolated. These results support 
the safety and performance of the system. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 20 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 20 of 76 
 
 
1.3.2 
Endocardial Ablation Studies – The PEFCAT Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. has also initiated a safety and feasibility study at Na Homolce 
Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic and HopitalCardiologique du Haut-Leveque in 
Pessac, Franceunder the “PEFCAT” Protocol, CS0267. This study is being conducted 
using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Seventy-one (71) patients 
have been enrolled between October 2018 and February 2020. Fifty (50) patients 
were enrolled in Prague and twenty-one (21) were enrolled in Bordeaux. All patients 
were discharged in good condition. One patient was treated for an air embolism 
during the index Procedure and the event was resolved. Five (5) patients were re- 
hospitalized for atrial arrhythmia and all of these events were resolved. One patient 
was hospitalized for chest pain and the event was resolved. Two (2) patients 
experienced a prolonged index hospitalization due to an arteriovenous groin fistula 
which was resolved. One patient that was treated with the FARAPULSE Endocardial 
Ablation System during the remap procedure had a pericardial effusion that presented 
hours after the procedure and was treated with a pericardiocentesis and resolved. Two 
patients surgery for inguinal hernias during the course of follow up. At the conclusion 
of the index procedure, all pulmonary veins (PVs) in all patients were isolated using 
the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Sixty-five (65) patients have 
returned for the protocol-defined 75-day remapping procedure to assess durable PV 
isolation. In these patients, 91.3% of PVs remained isolated. All PVs in forty-nine 
(49) patients undergoing reassessment remained isolated. These results support the 
safety and performance of the system. 
1.3.3 
Endocardial Ablation Studies - The PEFCAT II Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. has also initiated a safety and feasibility study at Na Homolce 
Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic and KBC Split in Split, Croatia, under the 
“PECAT II” Protocol, CS0571.This study is being conducted using the FARAPULSE 
Endocardial Alablation System, including both the FARAWAVE and FARAFLEX 
ablation catheters. Ten (10) patients were enrolled in October 2019. Five (5) patients 
were enrolled in Prague and five (5) were enrolled in Split. All patients were 
discharged in good condition. 
 
No patients experienced a serious adverse event during the study. 
 
At the conclusion of the index procedure, all pulmonary veins (PVs) in all patients 
were isolated using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Four (4) patients 
received successful ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus with the FARAFLEX 
Ablation Catheter for associated atrial flutter during the index procedure. 
 
Nine (9) patients have returned for the protocol-defined 75-Day remapping procedure 
to assess durable PV isolation and durable cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, when 
applicable. In these patients 94.1% of PVs remained isolated. Two (2) out of three (3) 
patients that received cavotricuspid isthmus ablation at index and returned for their 
remapping procedure had durable cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Six (6) out of nine 
(9%) patients that returned for a remapping procedure had durable PVI and 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 21 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 21 of 76 
 
 
cavotricuspid isthmus block, when applicable. These results support the safety and 
performance of the system. 
1.3.4 
Endocardial Ablation Studies – The PersAFOne Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. has also initiated a safety and feasibility study at Na Homolce 
Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic and KBC Split in Split, Croatia, under the 
“PersAFOne” Protocol, CS0607. This study is being conducted using the 
FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System, including both the FARAWAVE and 
FARAFLEX Ablation Catheters, for the treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. 
Twenty-eight (28) patients were enrolled between October 2019 and July 2020. Sixteen 
(16) patients were enrolled in Prague and twelve (12) patients were enrolled in Split. 
All patients were discharged in good condition. 
One patient was hospitalized during follow up due to eye trauma and hospitalized again 
for a surgical operation to treat the eye trauma. One patient was hospitalized after they 
fell off of a roof. One patient was hospitalized for tonsillitis. One patient experienced a 
pericardial effusion after the protocol-defined remapping procedure, although no 
FARAPULSE devices were used during the remap procedure. All events have 
resolved. 
 
At the conclusion of the index procedure, all pulmonary veins (PVs) in all patients 
were isolated using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Thirteen (13) 
patients had successful ablation of their cavotricuspid isthmus for treatment of 
associated atrial flutter utilizing the FARAFLEX Ablation Catheter. Twenty-five (25) 
patients had successful ablation of the left atrial posterior wall performed with the 
FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Two (2) patients had successful mitral 
isthmus ablation with the FARAFLEX Ablation Catheter at the index procedure. 
 
Twenty-five (25) patients have returned for the protocol-defined 75-Day remapping 
procedure to assess the durability of the index lesion set. 87.6% of veins remapped 
remained isolated. 19/25 patients had all of their veins isolated at the remap procedure. 
9/12 patients that received ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus had durable lesions at 
the remap. 18/22 patients that had left atrial posterior wall ablation performed at index 
had durable isolation at the remapping procedure. Both patients that had mitral isthmus 
ablation at the index procedure did not have durable lesions. These results support the 
safety and performance of the system. 
1.3.5 
Endocardial Ablation Studies – The PersAFOne II Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. has also initiated a safety and feasibility study at Na Homolce 
Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic under the “PersAFOne II” Protocol, CS1335. This 
study is being conducted using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System Plus, 
including both the FARAWAVE and FARAPOINT Ablation Catheters, for the 
treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Twenty (20) patients were enrolled between 
September and November 2021. All patients were discharged in good condition. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 22 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 22 of 76 
 
 
At the conclusion of the index procedure, all pulmonary veins (PVs) in all patients 
were isolated using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Twenty (20) 
patients had successful ablation of their cavotricuspid isthmus for treatment of 
associated atrial flutter utilizing the FARAPOINT Ablation Catheter. Twenty (20) 
patients had successful ablation of the left atrial posterior wall performed with the 
FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System Plus. 
 
Twenty (20) patients have returned for the protocol-defined 60-Day remapping 
procedure to assess the durability of the index lesion set. 94.9% of veins remapped 
remained isolated. 16/20 patients had all of their veins isolated at the remap procedure. 
16/20 patients that received ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus had durable lesions at 
the remap. 18/20 patients that had left atrial posterior wall ablation performed at index 
had durable isolation at the remapping procedure. These results support the safety and 
performance of the system. 
 
1.3.6 
Endocardial Ablation Studies – The PersAFOne III Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. has also initiated a safety and feasibility study at Na Homolce 
Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic under the “PersAFOne II” Protocol, CS1543. This 
study is being conducted using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System Plus- 
PersAF, including both the FARAWAVE and FARAPOINT Ablation Catheters, for 
the treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Thirty (30) patients have been enrolled 
between February and October 2022. All patients were discharged in good condition. 
One subject did not undergo treatment with the investigational system due to tortuous 
vasculature that prevented insertion of any study devices. 
 
At the conclusion of the index procedure, all pulmonary veins (PVs) in all treated 
patients were isolated using the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System. Ten (9) 
patients had successful ablation of their cavotricuspid isthmus for treatment of 
associated atrial flutter utilizing the FARAPOINT Ablation Catheter. Twenty-nine (29) 
patients had successful ablation of the left atrial posterior wall performed with the 
FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System Plus, either at the index or 60-day remap 
procedures. 
 
Nineteen (19) patients have returned for the protocol-defined 60-Day remapping 
procedure to assess the durability of the index lesion set. 90.9% of veins remapped 
remained isolated. 13/19 patients had all of their veins isolated at the remap procedure. 
All subjects remain in follow-up. These results support the safety and performance of 
the system. 
 
Among nine (9) subjects undergoing CTI ablation using the FARAPOINT Catheter, six 
(6) manifested some degree of angiographic spasm in the right coronary artery near the 
site of ablation. None of these spasms resulted in complete occlusion of the artery or 
were accompanied by changes in ECG, echo, or other parameters indicating ischemia 
or other complications. All spasms resolved within 20 minutes of onset and prior to 
the conclusion of the procedure. In two of these subjects, IV nitroglycerin was 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 23 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 23 of 76 
 
 
administered prior to ablation with spasm occurring after ablation. Additional 
nitroglycerin did not immediately resolve the spasm. In both cases, spasm resolved 
within 20 minutes of onset. Prior investigations of patients undergoing RF ablation of 
CTI or mitral isthmus-dependent flutter found 21% and 28% rates of coronary 
impingement, respectively.25,26 
 
1.3.7 
Endocardial Ablation Studies – The FARA-Freedom Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. has also initiated a post-market clinical follow-up study “FARA- 
Freedom” Protocol, CS1169 at 13 sites in the EU. This study is being conducted using 
the CE-Marked FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System, including both the 
FARAWAVE Ablation Catheter, for the treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. 
One-hundred and eighty subjects were enrolled between December 2021 and August 
2022. Per protocol all enrolled subjects undergo PVI using the FARAPULSE Pulsed 
Field Ablation System, with safety and efficacy monitoring extending for 12 months. 
This study is currently in follow-up with completion expected in August 2023. 
 
 
1.3.8 
Endocardial Ablation Studies – The FARA-Free Study 
FARAPULSE, Inc. has also initiated a safety and feasibility study at KBC Split in 
Split, Croatia, under the “FARA-FREE” Protocol, CS0766. This study is being 
conducted using the FARAPULSE Ablation System Plus for the treatment of drug- 
resistant paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Fifteen (15) patients were enrolled in July 2020 
in Split. All patients were discharged in good condition. 
One patient was hospitalized with atrial tachycardia, which was treated with a 
medication adjustment and resolved without sequelae. 
 
At the conclusion of the index procedure, all pulmonary veins in all patients were 
successfully ablated with the FARAPULSE Ablation System Plus. Prospective 
remapping was not required for this study. All fifteen (15) patients remain in follow up. 
 
 
 
1.4 
Rationale for Conducting This Feasibility Study 
Catheter ablation for PAF with a variety of energy sources and catheter configurations 
has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective procedure. The FARAPULSE Pulsed 
Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF, with the exception of the FARAPOINT Pulsed 
Field Ablation Catheter which is currently undergoing preclinical testing, has 
undergone preclinical and clinical testing to demonstrate that it can isolate pulmonary 
veins and posterior left atrium quickly and with minimal complications, using a 
standard catheter-based endocardial procedure. Ongoing clinical follow-up 
demonstrates durable lesions at 75-90 day remapping procedures. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 24 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 24 of 76 
 
 
This study will investigate the use of the the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation 
System Plus-PersAF in the treatment of patients with PersAF. The availability of the 
FARAWAVE Ablation Catheter and the FARAPOINT Ablation Catheter allow the 
delivery of PEF ablation in the same locations as existing treatment such as RF 
ablation, and thus permit treatment of PersAF. The addition of the 8Fr focal 
FARAPOINT Ablation Catheter will provide flexible PEF lesion creation via a low- 
profile (8Fr diameter) form factor with maneuvering capabilities similar to those of 
widely marketed 8Fr RF ablation catheters. Enhanced maneuverability may make the 
creation of technically challenging lesion sets, such as those focal atrial triggers at the 
mitral isthmus or posterior wall, easier thus reducing procedure times and related 
complications. Further, both remap and long-term clinical follow-up data using 
existing approved devices for complex lesion sets in PersAF have shown mixed 
results24. The highly durable PEF lesions demonstrated to date in other FARAPULSE 
studies, especially for PVI, indicates that focal ablation using the same energy modality 
in the FARAPOINT catheter may improve these outcomes. 
Potential Risks: Based on the growing experience with the FARAPULSE Endocardial 
Ablation System, the risks associated with this small feasibility study are not expected 
to differ from those products that are approved and available on the market for catheter- 
based or surgical ablation procedures. In addition, verification and validation testing of 
the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF will ensure device safety 
and performance during the clinical investigation as well as compliance with the 
applicable parts of the Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC. FARAPULSE will ensure 
through its Risk Management processes that the residual risks have been reduced to a 
level that is as low as possible. 
Potential Benefits: A study of up to 90 patients for assessment in this protocol will have 
the following potential benefits: 
• To provide treatment to subjects with PersAF using an investigational device 
which has demonstrated the ability to isolate pulmonary veins and the posterior 
left atrium and reduce the subsequent occurrence of symptomatic atrial 
fibrillation in a small number of patients 
• To generate additional data demonstrating that the endocardial creation of 
electrically isolating lesions via Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) catheter ablation 
applied using the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is a 
safe and potentially effective treatment for drug-resistant, recurrent, 
symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF); 
• To assess the feasibility and safety of the FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation 
Catheter for focal ablation in accordance with its proposed indication for use; 
 
Please see Section 4.0,Benefit Risk Assessment, for additional details regarding the 
assessment of benefits and risks associated with this study. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 25 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 25 of 76 
 
 
2. Investigational Devices 
2.1 
Names of Investigational Devices 
The FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is comprised of the 
following devices: 
• FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
• FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
• FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator 
• FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath 
2.2 
Intended Use 
The FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is indicated for the 
treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation. 
 
The FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter is used as an adjunctive device in the 
endocardial treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation with the following intended uses: 
• Gap ablation to complete electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins, 
• Focal ablation of cardiac arrhythmias, and 
• Creation of ablation line between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid valve. 
 
2.3 
Classification 
The FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter and FARAPOINT Pulsed Field 
Ablation Catheter are classified as Class III medical devices. Per MDR 2017/745 
Annex VIII, Rule 6 applies to the ablation catheters, which defines the catheters as 
surgically invasive devices intended for transient use (<60 min) that are intended 
specifically to control, diagnose, monitor or correct a defect of the heart or of the 
central circulatory system through direct contact with those parts of the body. 
The FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator is classified as a Class IIb medical 
device. Per MDR 2017/745 Annex VIII, Rule 9 applies to the generator system, which 
defines it as an active therapeutic device that is intended to administer or exchange 
energy with the human body in a potentially hazardous way, taking account of the 
nature, the density and the site of application of the energy. 
The FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath is classified as a Class III medical device. Per 
MDR 2017/745 Annex VIII, Rule 6 applies to the Steerable Sheath, which defines it as 
a surgically invasive device intended for transient use (<60 min) that are intended 
specifically to control, diagnose, monitor or correct a defect of the heart or of the 
central circulatory system through direct contact with those parts of the body. 
2.4 
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF 
The FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF used in the proposed 
clinical investigation consists of the FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter, the 
FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter, the FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 26 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 26 of 76 
 
 
Generator and Recording System Module, and the FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath. 
These components, sub-components and model numbers are listed in Table 1. 
 
As of 27 January 2021, the FARAWAVE Catheters (31mm and 35mm), FARASTAR 
Generator (61M401), and the FARADRIVE Sheath have received CE Mark approval. 
The FARADRIVE Sheath will be used in the subject clinical investigation as a CE 
Marked commercially available component of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation 
System Plus-PersAF. Because the intended purpose of the FARADRIVE Sheath is for 
general percutaneous catheter introduction into the vasculature and into the chambers 
of the heart, it can be safely used as a CE Mark device per the Instructions for Use as 
part of the subject clinical investigation along with the other investigational devices; 
FARAWAVE and FARASTAR. The FARAPOINT Catheter and FARASTAR 
Generator (61C614) will continue to be used in the subject clinical investigation as 
non-CE Marked investigational devices as they will be investigated for the non- 
approved indication of the FARAPOINT Catheter. For this clinical study the 
FARAWAVE Catheter will be used in conjunction with FARASTAR (61M401) 
Generator for the purposes of PV isolation and posterior left atrium ablation. 
 
Table 1. 
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF – Components 
 
Trade Name 
System Model Number (REF#) 
FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
1. Ablation Catheters 
(31 mm and 35 mm – fully deployed 
diameters) 
2. Connection Cable 
41M401 (31 mm) and 41M402 (35 mm) 
41M404 (connection cable) 
FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
1. Ablation Catheter 
2. Connection Cable 
41C605 (catheter) 
41M404 (connection cable) 
FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator 
1. Pulsed Electric Field Generator (PEFG) 
2. Recording System Module 
3. Accessory Cables 
61C614 ( Generator system with 
FARAPOINT and FARAWAVE 
Catheter capability. Used only with the 
FARAPOINT Catheter in this study) 
61M401 (Commercially approved 
Generator system with only 
FARAWAVE Catheter capability) 
61M407 (Recording System Module) 
FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath or commercially 
available CE Marked Steerable Sheath System, 
such as the CE Marked Oscor Destino™ Twist 
UniDirectional Deflectable Guiding Sheath)* 
1. Sheath 
2. Dilator 
21M402 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 27 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 27 of 76 
 
 
 
 
During the course of the investigation certain CE Marked medical devices may be 
used in conjunction with the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus- 
PersAF. These are listed in Table 2. 
 
Table 2. 
CE Marked Devices Utilized in Conjunction with the FARAPULSE Pulsed 
Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF 
 
CE Marked Devices That May be Used in Conjunction with FARAPULSE Pulsed Field 
Ablation System Plus-PersAF 
*OscorDestino™ Twist UniDirectional Deflectable Guiding Sheath 
Abbott AgilisNxT Steerable Introducer (can be used with FARAPOINT) 
Boston Scientif Zurpaz 8.5F Steerale Introducer (can be used with FARAPOINT) 
Abbott BRKTM and BRK-1TM 98cm Transseptal Needle 
Merit Medical Heartspan Transseptal Needle, 98cm length, 50 and 86 Curves 
MicroPaceStimCor Cardiac Stimulator 
 
A schematic of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is 
depicted in Figure 1 following. 
 
Figure 1. FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF Components 
Components shown outside of the dashed line are not provided with the FARAPULSE 
Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 28 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 28 of 76 
 
 
2.4.1 
FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
The FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter is offered in two different sizes: 31 
mm (REF 41M401) and 35mm (REF 42M402) deployed diameters, to accommodate 
varying pulmonary vein anatomy (Figure 2). Selection of either catheter will be at the 
investigator’s discretion. 
 
 
Figure 2. Representative Illustration of the FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation 
Catheter 
(Provided in 31mm and 35mm Deployed Diameters) 
 
The FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter is a multi-electrode catheter that 
connects electrically to the FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator. It consists 
of a multi-electrode ablation catheter with electrodes arranged on splines. The 
Ablation Catheter consists of a distal section with five splines that deploy into a 
basket-shaped configuration or flower-shaped configuration with five petals (Figure 
3), a shaft section, and a proximal handle with a manually operated deployment 
control. Each spline has a single electrode that is separately wired to facilitate 
connection to a mapping or recording system (this is an optional feature offered to the 
user). The handle includes a flush port for saline infusion, a deployment control knob 
with a guidewire lumen hub that can be connected to a hemostasis valve, and a cable 
with connectors. The FARAWAVE Catheter connects to the FARASTAR 
Connection Cable (included with the FARAWAVE Catheter) which connects to the 
FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablatin Generator. The Pulsed Electric Field energy is 
delivered via the FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator over the set of 
ablation catheter electrodes. The FARASTAR Connection Cable is single-use, sterile 
and provides the required length to connect to the FARASTAR Pulsed Field 
Ablation Generator. 
 
Additional details are provided in the IFU LBL1262 for the specific use and 
procedural steps of the FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 29 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 29 of 76 
 
 
 
 
Figure 3. Distal section of the FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
(Shown deployed in “flower” and “basket” configurations) 
 
2.4.2 
FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
The FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter is a multi-electrode unidirectional, 
deflectable percutaneous catheter that connects to the FARASTAR Pulsed Field 
Ablation Generator and is designed to deliver PEF energy from the Pulsed Field 
Ablation Generator for cardiac tissue ablation. The FARAPOINT Pulsed Field 
Ablation Catheter is an adjunctive catheter designed to create smaller focal-type 
lesions for the following indications for use: 
• Gap ablation to complete electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins, 
• Focal ablation of cardiac arrhythmias, and 
• Creation of ablation line between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid valve. 
The catheter consists of the following major sections: 1) a deflectable distal section 
with three electrodes, 2) an 8F catheter shaft, and 3) a proximal handle with a 
manually operated deflection control and a connector for attachment to the 
FARASTAR Generator (Figure 5). 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 30 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 30 of 76 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 4. FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter 
 
The FARAPOINT Catheter is an 8F device with a uni-directional deflectable section 
length of 7.5cm and a usable length of 115cm measured from the catheter strain relief 
to the catheter tip when in the undeflected state. Two pairs of 2mm and 1.5mm length 
eelctrodes enable bipolar delivery of PFA energy. These electrodes attach to the 
FARASTAR generator through one FARASTAR Connection Cable. The 
FARAPOINT Catheter can be used with the FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath, the 
Abott Agilis 8.5Fr NxT Steerable Introducer, or the Boston Scientific Zurpaz 8.5Fr 
Steerable Sheath. 
 
Additional details are provided in the IFU LBL0840 for the specific use and 
procedural steps of the FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter. 
 
 
2.4.3 
FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator and Recording System Module 
The FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator consists of the following 
components: FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator, Recording System 
Module, EGM Input Module, ECG Output Module, and accessory cables for system 
connections. The Pulsed Field Ablation Generator System is designed to deliver Pulsed 
Electric Field (PEF) energy to endocardial sites in the heart via the FARAWAVE and 
FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheters and other compatible devices. Refer to 
IFU LBL1262 and IFU LBL0840 for the specific use and procedural steps of the 
FARAWAVE and FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheters, respectively, IFU 
LBL1062 for the FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath and User Manuals LBL1260 (for 
FARASTAR Generator with FARAPOINT and FARAWAVE compatibility) and 
LBL1066 (for FARASTAR with only FARAWAVE compatibility) for specific use of 
the FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator. 
 
The FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator is a 12-channel output unit that 
generates a pulsed voltage waveform that can be delivered to the ablation catheter 
electrodes. The FARASTAR Generator currently allows ablation energy in discrete 
user-selectable voltage settings between 1400V and 2000V, depending on the catheter 
used. 
 
The FARASTAR Pulsed Field Ablation Generator may be used in either Asynchronous 
Mode or Synchronous Mode. Asynchronous Mode delivers therapy without regard to 
the intrinsic cardiac cycle, whereas Synchronous Mode includes pacing output from an 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 31 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 31 of 76 
 
 
internal stimulator integrated into the Generator which captures the heart in 
synchronization with the delivered therapeutic pulses. 
 
The Recording System Module is an accessory component to the FARASTAR 
Generator. This component’s primary function is to disconnect the inputs of the EP 
Lab Recording System (non-FARAPULSE third party device) from being connected to 
the patient during Pulsed Field Ablation delivery. The inputs include diagnostic 
catheters and surface ECGs. This action reduces the risk of interference to the 
recording system inputs during an ablation. The Recording System Module resides 
between the patient and the EP Lab Recording System. Its functionality is implemented 
by a set of relays that are controlled automatically by the FARASTAR Generator. 
 
Details regarding use of the FARASTAR Generator is provided in the FARASTAR 
Pulsed Field Ablation Generator User Manuals LBL1260 (with FARAPOINT and 
FARAWAVE compatibility) and LBL1066 (with only FARAWAVE compatibility). 
Use of the FARASTAR Recording System Module User Manual is provided in 
LBL1261. The FARASTAR Generator (61C614) will be with the FARAPOINT 
Catheter for the purposes of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, PV gap ablation, and non- 
PV focal ablation. The FARAWAVE Catheter will be used in conjunction with 
FARASTAR (61M401) Generator for the purposes of PV isolation and posterior left 
atrium ablation. 
 
 
2.4.4 
FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath 
The FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter and FARAPOINT Pulsed Field 
Ablation Catheter are used with the FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath or a compatible 
CE Marked Deflectable Sheath System (13F) such as the CE Marked OscorDestino™ 
Twist UniDirectional Deflectable Guiding Sheath. The FARAPOINT Pulsed Field 
Ablation Catheter may also be used with the CE Marked Abbott AgilisNxT Steerable 
Introducer. 
The FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath consists of two (2) primary components: 
Steerable Sheath (Figure 6) and Dilator (Figure 7), which are used together. Both 
components are sterile and single use only. 
The FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath is comprised of a distal deflectable section and a 
shaft section which connect to the handle. The handle includes a knob to control the 
deflection of the distal tip and a flush port for infusion of saline or contrast. The 
Dilator is intended for insertion through the sheath lumen and includes a tapered tip 
for dilation for vascular or chamber access. 
The FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath is compatible with Standard commercially 
available guidewires up to 0.035”, SJM or Abbott BRKTM and BRK-1TM Transseptal 
Needle and Stainless Steel Stylet, Adult 18 Ga, 98cm Needle Usable Length, and 
Merit Medical Heartspan Transseptal Needle and Stainless Steel Stylet, 98cm 
length, 50 and 86 Curves. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 32 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 32 of 76 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 5. FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath 
 
 
Figure 6. FARADRIVE Dilator 
 
 
Additional details are provided in the IFU LBL1062 for the specific use and procedural 
steps of the FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath. 
 
2.5 
Device Accountability 
The FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF will be stored in a secure 
location and access will be controlled. Records will be maintained to document the 
physical location of inventory from shipment and removal from Sponsor or Contract 
Manufacture facility through use and/or return or disposal. 
The site will be responsible for maintaining a Device Accountability Log provided by 
the Sponsor or its designated representative.At a minimum the following will be 
recorded: Date of receipt, FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF 
components identification number (Generator, Ablation Catheter and Deflectable 
Sheath lot and / or serial number), expiration date, date of use, subject unique 
identification code and date of disposal or return of the device. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 33 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 33 of 76 
 
 
If there is a product Device Deficiency / Malfunction or other need to return the system 
or system components to the Sponsor or Contract Manufacture, the Sponsor or designee 
should be contacted for safe product disposal and/ or return details. Appropriate CRF 
will be completed in the event of a Device Deficiency / Malfunction. 
The Investigator is responsible for ensuring that the investigational devices are used 
only under the Investigator’s supervision and are only used according to this protocol 
and any approved amendments. The Investigator will not supply an investigational 
device to any person not authorized to participate in the study. The Investigator shall 
document on the Case Report Forms (CRFs) the lot numbers and / or serial numbers of 
the devices used during each case. 
2.6 
Return of Devices 
All unused investigational devices will be returned to the Study Sponsor or designee 
upon completion of the clinical study. Any investigational device that does not meet 
performance specifications will also be returned to the Study Sponsor or designee for 
analysis per company procedures. The Investigator or his/ her designated 
representative is responsible for device accountability and disposition of all used and 
unused devices. The Study Sponsor or its designated representative will conduct 
device reconciliation at the completion of subject enrollment or at the conclusion of the 
study. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 34 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 34 of 76 
 
 
3. StudyDesign 
3.1 
Study Objective 
The objective of this safety and feasibility study is to assess whether the endocardial 
creation of electrically nonconductive lesions via PEF catheter ablation applied using 
the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is a feasible and safe 
treatment for PersAFand associated AFL. 
3.2 
Study Overview 
This is a prospective, multi-center, unblinded single arm safety and feasibility study. 
Subjects will undergo percutaneous PEF ablation for pulmonary vein isolation and at 
the clinical discretion of the investigator receive PEF ablation of additional 
arrhythmogenic locations. Subjects will be followed at 30 days, 60 days, 6 months and 
12 months for adverse events, recurrence of arrhythmia after a 90-day Blanking Period 
and other relevant outcome measures. 
3.3 
Subject Confidentiality 
Enrolled subjects will be assigned a unique, pseudo-anonymous identifier that will be 
used to maintain confidentiality of each subject’s medical information. Subject names 
and other protected health information will not be captured on the CRFs. In addition, 
all patient identifiers except the unique pseudo-anonymous identifier should be 
redacted from any images or other data submitted from the participating site to the 
Sponsor or the Sponsor’s designated reviewers for analysis.All information concerning 
subjects or their participation in this study will be considered confidential. Only the 
authorized Sponsor, designated representative personnel, designated consultants and 
regulatory agencies will have access to these confidential files. 
3.4 
Written Informed Consent 
All subjects must provide written Informed Consent using the EC-approved ICF before 
undergoing any study related procedures. 
Routine clinical evaluations that would be performed as part of the normal clinical care 
of patients may be performed prior to such consent and used as part of the screening 
assessment. If the subject is subsequently consented and enrolled in the study, the 
results of such evaluations may be used as study data. 
Subjects cannot be asked to sign the ICF until the study has been fully approved by the 
institution’s EC and by the CA, if applicable, and the Sponsor or their CRO 
representative has received and reviewed the EC-approved ICF. Subjects who meet the 
general entry criteria will be asked to sign an ICF as approved by the relevant 
regulatory authorities before any study-specific tests or procedures are performed. 
The Investigator or a designated member of his/ her staff should approach the subject to 
obtain written informed consent. As far as possible, non-technical language shall be 
used that is understandable to the subject. The background of the proposed study and 
the benefits and risks of the procedures and study should be explained. The subject 
should be provided with ample time to read the ICF and discuss it with their family and 
physician. The subject shall be informed that his/ her participation in the clinical 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 35 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 35 of 76 
 
 
investigation is confidential. The ICF must be read and understood by the subject and 
the subject’s questions answered. The ICF must be signed and dated by both the 
subject and Investigator conducting informed consent prior to subject enrollment and 
before the subject undergoes any study-related procedures. All subjects are to receive 
copies of their signed and dated ICF. A copy of the approved ICF along with a copy of 
each patient’s signed ICFwill be maintained by the Investigator in a designated clinical 
study administrative file. Subjects may not be consented after receiving any 
medication that might alter their ability to comprehend the consent form (e.g. 
sedatives, narcotics, etc.). Study personnel should explain that even if a subject agrees 
to participate in the study and signs the ICF, the subject may not be eligible to 
participate if he/ she fails to meet the screening criteria. 
Written informed consent must be obtained prior to performing any protocol driven 
tests or any procedures that are not standard of care for a percutaneous ablation 
procedure that the subject is scheduled to undergo. 
Once written consent has been obtained, the subject will be entered on a Screening Log, 
which will be maintained at each site. All subjects who provide written informed 
consent will be entered on the screening log regardless of whether or not they are 
enrolled in the study. 
 
3.5 
Study Entry Criteria 
3.5.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
Study subjects are required to meet all the following inclusion criteria to participate in 
this study: 
 
1. Patients with documented drug-resistant symptomatic persistent AF meeting all 
three of the following criteria: 
a. Patient is refractory or intolerant to at least one Class I/III antiarrhythmic 
agent. 
b. ECG-documented first episode of persistent AF, lasting longer than 7 
days but not longer than 365 days 
c. Holter within 90 days prior tothe Enrollment Date demonstrating 24 
hours of continuous AF 
2. Patients who are ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age on the day of enrollment. 
3. Patient participation requirements: 
a. Lives locally. 
b. Is willing and capable of providing Informed Consent to undergo study 
procedures. 
c. Is willing to participate in all examinations and follow-up visits and tests 
associated with this clinical study. 
3.5.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
Subjects will be excluded from participating in this study if they meet any one of the 
following exclusion criteria: 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 36 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 36 of 76 
 
 
1. Atrial fibrillation that is any of the following: 
a. Paroxysmal (longest AF episode < 7days) 
b. Longstanding (has persisted > 12 months or that does not respond to 
cardioversion if < 12 months) 
c. Secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol abuse or 
other reversible / non-cardiac causes 
2. Left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 5.5 cm as documented by transthoracic 
echocardiography (TTE) or computed tomography (CT) 
3. Any of the following cardiac procedures, implants or conditions: 
a. Clinically significant arrhythmias other than AF, AFL or AT 
b. Hemodynamically significant valvular disease 
c. Prosthetic heart valve 
d. NYHA Class III or IV CHF 
e. Previous endocardial or epicardial ablation or surgery for AF 
f. Atrial or ventricular septal defect closure 
g. Atrial myxoma 
h. Left atrial appendage device or occlusion 
i. Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac 
resynchronization therapy devices 
j. Significant or symptomatic hypotension 
k. Bradycardia or chronotropic incompetence 
l. History of pericarditis 
m. History of rheumatic fever 
n. History of congenital heart disease with any residual anatomic or 
conduction abnormality 
4. Any of the following within 3 months prior toenrollment: 
a. Myocardial infarction 
b. Unstable angina 
c. Percutaneous coronary intervention 
d. Heart surgery (e.g. coronary artery bypass grafting, ventriculotomy, 
atriotomy) 
e. Heart failure hospitalization 
f. Stroke or TIA 
g. Clinically significant bleeding 
h. Pericarditis or pericardial effusion 
i. Left atrial thrombus 
5. History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities. 
6. Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systemic anticoagulation. 
7. Contraindications to CT or MRI. 
8. Sensitivity to contrast media not controlled by premedication. 
9. Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, lactating or not using birth 
control. 
10. Medical conditions that would prevent participation in the study, interfere with 
assessment or therapy, significantly raise the risk of study participation, or 
confound data or its interpretation, including but not limited to: 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 37 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 37 of 76 
 
 
a. Body mass index (BMI) >40 
b. Solid organ or hematologic transplant, or currently being evaluated for an 
organ transplant 
c. Severe lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, or any lung disease 
involving abnormal blood gases or significant dyspnea 
d. Renal insufficiency with an estimated creatinine clearance < 30 
mL/min/1.73 m2, or any history of renal dialysis or renal transplant 
e. Active malignancy or history of treated cancer within 24 months of 
enrollment 
f. Clinically significant gastrointestinal problems involving the esophagus, 
stomach and/or untreated acid reflux 
g. Clinically significant infection 
h. Predicted life expectancy less than one year 
11. Clinically significant psychological condition that in the investigator’s opinion 
would prohibit the subject's ability to meet the protocol requirements. 
12. Current or anticipated enrollment in any other clinical study. 
13. Employment by FARAPULSE or the same hospital department or office of any 
investigator, or a family member of any of the preceding groups. 
14. Use of amiodarone after day of index ablation procedure. Patients will cease 
use of amiodarone on or before the date of the index ablation procedure. 
3.6 
Enrollment 
Subjects that meet all of the eligibility criteria and are deemed suitable by the 
investigator will be invited to participate in the study. 
Subjects will be considered enrolled at the time of signing the ICF. 
Each subject will be assigned a unique study identification code to protect each 
subject’s confidential health information. The unique study identification code will not 
include date of birth or subject’s first and last initials and will be used to link study data 
and other study information to the subject in lieu of the subject name. The Subject 
Name Log will be used to link the unique study identity code to the subject and will be 
maintained at the site. This log will remain confidential and will not be provided to the 
Sponsor, but only used for reference when monitoring at the study site. 
3.7 
Sample Size 
Up to 90 subjects in total will be enrolled at up to four sites in this clinical safety and 
feasibilitystudy. Approved sites will enroll at least 5 and not more than 60 subjects. 
3.8 
Investigational Sites 
The clinical study will be conducted at up to four investigational sites. 
3.9 Duration of Subject Participation 
Subjects will be followed at 30 days, 60 days, 6 months and 12 months with a 90-day 
Blanking Period for recurrent atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia 
following theIndexProcedure. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 38 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 38 of 76 
 
 
Reablation with the study device(s) during the Blanking Period is permitted but does not 
extend either the Blanking Period or the total follow-up interval. 
The enrollment period is estimated to take 9 months and subjects will be followed for up 
to 12 months for a total duration of approximately 21 months. 
3.10 Subject Completion or Withdrawal 
3.10.1 
Study Completion 
Once the subject has completed the final 12 month follow-up visit they are to be 
exited from the study. 
3.10.2 
Voluntary Withdrawal 
Subjects may voluntarily withdraw from the study at any time for any reason. 
3.10.3 
Investigator Initiated withdrawal 
The investigator may withdraw the subject due to any of the following situations: 
• adverse event (AE); or 
• study investigator may withdraw a patient from the study without the patient’s 
consent if the investigator has a concern for the patient’s rights, safety or 
welfare 
3.10.4 
Documentation 
At the time of study withdrawal or completion for any reason, the study exit CRF will 
be completed, including the reason for exit. 
3.10.5 
Continuing Medical Care 
Subjects leaving the study at any time will continue to receive appropriate medical 
care without prejudice. 
3.10.6 
Lost to Follow-Up 
If the investigator has attempted to contact a subject at least three times within 60 
days and received no response, the subject may be considered lost to follow-up. The 
investigator will document that a minimum of three attempts were made to contact 
the subject, including sending a certified letter if current address is known, prior to 
exiting the subject from the study. 
At the time of confirmed lost to follow-up status, the study exit CRF will be 
completed. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 39 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 39 of 76 
 
 
3.11 Procedures 
3.11.1 
Index Procedure 
The investigator will confirm that the following have been achieved: 
• For women of childbearing potential – a negative pregnancy test 
• Baseline NIHSS score 
• The patient is not on amiodarone 
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation procedure patients will undergo anesthesia 
according to institutional protocol. They will then be prepared in conventional sterile 
fashion for a cardiac catheterization procedure. Femoral vein access will be obtained 
via Seldinger technique. Transseptal access to the left atrium will then be obtained 
using either a FARADRIVE Steerable sheath or a commercially approved sheath and 
Brockenbrough needle. The transseptal sheath will then be withdrawn, leaving 
guidewire access to the left atrium. The FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath, or a 
commercial equivalent as described above in Table 2,will then be prepared and 
advanced via guidewire to the left atrium. Commercially approved multielectrode 
pacing catheters will then be placed via conventional technique at the investigator’s 
discretion. A baseline electrophysiological assessment of pulmonary vein connection 
to the left atrium will be made and documented via FARAWAVE or a commercially 
approved diagnostic catheter placedin each addressable pulmonary vein. A baseline 
3D electroanatomical map may also be made at the investigator’s discretion. The 
diagnostic catheter will then be removed from the FARADRIVE Steerable Sheath or 
commercial equivalent. 
The FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter will then be prepared and 
advanced over the guidewire to the left atrium through the sheath. The guidewire will 
be advanced into a target pulmonary vein, the catheter splines will be deployed to suit 
target anatomy by retracting the deployment knob, and the deployed catheter will be 
advanced to the ostium of the target pulmonary vein. At the investigator’s discretion, 
contrast venography may be performed to verify placement of the catheter at the 
ostium. Cardiac pacing capture from the FARASTAR generator may be obtained via 
connection to a diagnostic catheter, at investigator discretion. Once pacing capture is 
confirmed, if used, ablation will be performed. Otherwise, ablation will be performed 
asynchronously. Ablation dose will be selected at the investigator’s discretion in 
accordance with LBL1260 (for the FARASTAR Generator with FARAPOINT and 
FARAWAVE compatibility) or LBL1066 (for the FARASTAR Generator with only 
FARAWAVE compatibility) in the range of 1800-2000V. 
 
Ablation with the FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter may be repeated at 
the same site or at another target site at the physician’s discretion using deployment 
configurations to suit target anatomy. Each addressable pulmonary vein will be 
ablated in turn beginning with placement of the guidewire, deployment of the ablation 
catheter, confirmation of pacing capture, and ablation. The effect of the ablation(s) 
may be checked post-procedure by pacing maneuvers, ECG recordings, 3D 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 40 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 40 of 76 
 
 
electroanatomic mapping, or by using the mapping electrodes on the ablation catheter 
splines. 
Ablation using the FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter may be performed to 
close gaps in electrical isolation of pulmonary veins, focally ablate cardiac 
arrhythmias, or create a line of ablation at the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI). If the 
FARAPOINT Catheter is used, it will be connected to the FARASTAR Generator 
(61C614). Ablation dose will be selected at investigator discretion in the range of 
1400-2000V. 
 
For a detailed description of procedure workflow refer to LBL1062 (FARADRIVE 
Steerable Sheath), LBL1262 (FARAWAVE Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter), 
LBL0840 (FARAPOINT Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter), LBL1260 (FARASTAR 
Generator with FARAPOINT and FARAWAVE compatibility) and LBL1066 
(FARASTAR Generator with only FARAWAVE compatibility). 
At the investigator’s discretion coronary assessments (e.g. angiography, FFR, IFR) 
may be made in either left or right coronary artery to assess potential response to PFA 
application. At investigator’s discretion, in order to assess effect on coronary spasm, 
an angiogram will be performed and intravenous nitroglycerin administered, at doses 
up to 3mg, before, during, or after PFA application(s) at the CTI. Routine 
hemodynamic monitoring will be performed. Nitroglycerin may be administered via 
intracoronary injection at investigator’s discretion. 
 
 
3.11.2 
60-Day Remap Procedure 
The 60-Day Remap Procedure will follow the steps contained in Section 3.11.1, 
Index Procedure, as determined by investigator discretionto achieveprotocol- 
requiredmapping and any required reablation. 
3.11.3 
Blanking Period 
The Blanking Period consists of Day 0 (the date of Index Procedure) through and 
including Day 90. 
During the Blanking Period, any recurrence of AF will be documented; however, 
recurrences of AF, AFL or AT during this time will not be consideredTherapeutic 
Failures. 
Subjects may undergo one repeat ablation during the Blanking Period without 
creating a Therapeutic Failure, following the procedure detailed in the preceding 
sections. This may occur during the Remap Procedure or at another procedure as 
clinically indicated. 
If a second repeat ablation procedure is performed during this time, or any nonstudy 
device is used for cardiac ablation, the subjects will be considered a Therapeutic 
Failure but will remain in the study. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 41 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 41 of 76 
 
 
Towards the end of the Blanking Period, any AFD treatment will be discontinued 
unless the Investigator deems the withdrawal of AFD treatment not to be in the best 
interests of the patient. 
3.11.4 
Arrhythmia Core Lab 
An Arrhythmia Core Lab will oversee the provision, collection and analysis of data 
from the Event Monitors and Holter Monitors specified in this protocol. 
• An Event Monitor will be provided at the 60-Day Remap to be used through the 
remainder of the 12-month follow-up interval for weekly scheduled and ad hoc 
symptomatic monitoring. Investigational sites will be provided with the Event 
Monitor and instructions for its use by the Arrhythmia Core Lab. The 
investigational sites will then provide the device and instructions for use to the 
subject. The Event Monitor will be returned to the Arrhythmia Core Lab at the 
time of the subject’s exit from the study. ECG data from the Event Monitor will 
be analyzed by the Arrhythmia Core Lab. 
• A 24-hour continuous ECG monitor will be provided at the 6 and 12-Month 
Visits. Investigational sites will be provided with the continuous ECG monitor 
device and instructions for its use by the Arrhythmia Core Lab. The 
investigational sites will then provide the device and instructions for use to the 
subject. The device will be worn by the subject for a single 24-hour period and 
then returned to the Core Lab with shipping materials provided by the core lab. 
ECG data from this monitor will be analyzed by the Core Lab. 
3.12 Schedule of Events and Assessments 
Subjects will complete the following visits and assessments as indicated below and as 
summarized in Section 3.12 Table 3 Summary of Study Assessments. 
3.12.1 
Baseline 
The following baseline data will be collected: 
• Medical history 
• AFD and anticoagulation medication history 
• Pregnancy test (all women of child-bearing potential) 
• 12-lead ECG 
• Cardiac CT or MRI adequate to characterize left atrial and pulmonary vein 
dimensions 
• TEE or other imaging modality for exclusion of left atrial thrombus 
• NYHA Classification 
• NIHSS score 
• CHA2DS2-VASc score 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 42 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 42 of 76 
 
 
3.12.2 
Index Procedure 
The Index Procedure will be performed according to Section 3.11.1, Index 
Procedure. The following procedural data will be collected: 
• Pregnancy test (all women of childbearing potential if baseline pregnancy test 
obtained more than 14 days prior to procedure) 
• Post-ablation 3D electroanatomical maps 
• Post-ablation fluoroscopic examination of diaphragm motion to assess phrenic 
nerve response 
• Adverse Events 
• Procedural times 
• Lesion set data 
• Device deficiencies and malfunctions 
• 
Coronary assessment (e.g. angiography, FFR, IFR) with or without nitroglycerine (NTG) 
administeration to assess effect on any coronary spasm before, during, or after PFA 
application(s), at investigar discretion. 
 
 
 
3.12.3 
Pre-Discharge 
Prior to hospital discharge the following data will be collected: 
• Adverse Events 
• Data regarding the use, changes in or discontinuation of anticoagulation, rate 
control and/or antiarrhythmic medications. 
• Cardiac rhythm as determined by a 12-lead ECG 
• Occurrence, date, indication and outcome of any cardioversion(s) 
• At the investigator’s discretion: a post-procedural mediastinal gadolinium- 
enhanced MRI 
• Stroke/TIA assessments 
o NIHSS score 
o A neurologic examination will be performed and recorded if: 
▪ If the NIHSSscore has increased by 2 or more points 
▪ If there is a clinical suspicion of stroke or TIA 
3.12.4 
30-Day Visit 
Discharged subjects will return for an office visit 30 days (± 7 days) post-ablation 
treatment. (Any subject who continues to be hospitalized 30 days post-ablation will 
have their 30-Day Visit assessment performed in-hospital). The following data will be 
collected at the 30-DayVisit: 
• Adverse Events 
• Symptoms of recurrent arrhythmia 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 43 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 43 of 76 
 
 
• Data regarding the use, changes in or discontinuation of anticoagulation, rate 
control and/or antiarrhythmic medications. 
• Cardiac rhythm as determined by a 12-lead ECG at the time of the visit 
• Cardioversions, ablations or hospital admissions since last visit 
• Heart failure status as assessed by NYHA classification at the time of visit 
3.12.5 
60-DayVisit and RemappingProcedure 
Patients undergoing protocol-specified remapping: 
Subjects will undergo the protocol-stipulated remappingprocedure at 60 ± 15 days 
post-Index Procedure as defined in Section 3.11.2, 60-Day Remap Procedure. 
• A 3D electroanatomical remapping procedure will be performed to assess 
electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins. Any electrical gaps may be closed at 
the investigator’s discretion using study devices, or if necessary, a commercially 
approved ablation device (which constitutes aTherapeutic Failure). 
• For patients who received extra-PV ablation at index, including those receiving 
ablation of the CTI, the persistence of nonconductivity in targeted tissue will be 
evaluated with either pacing maneuvers or electroanatomical mapping. 
Procedure-specific data will be collected as follows: 
• Procedural times 
• Lesion set data 
• Device deficiencies and malfunctions 
 
All subjects whether undergoing remapping or not: 
• Event Monitor: An Event Monitor and training will be provided to the subject, 
to be used for weekly scheduled and ad hoc symptomatic monitoring through 
the remainder of study follow-up.(See Section 3.11.4, Arrhythmia Core 
Lab).If necessary patients will be provided with an Event Monitor by mail, 
telephonic training and successful transmission of a monitoring record. 
• AFD Management: For patients who do not require reablation during the 60- 
Day remap visit AFD may be stopped at the investigator’s discretion. 
 
The following data will be collected from all subjects at 60 ± 15 days: 
• Adverse Events 
• Symptoms of recurrent arrhythmia 
• Fluoroscopic examination of diaphragm motion is required if: 
o Patient underwent remapping to assess phrenic nerve response 
o The patient declined a remap procedure but the post Index Procedure 
fluoroscopic examination indicated diminished phrenic nerve response 
• Data regarding the use, changes in or discontinuation of anticoagulation, rate 
control and/or antiarrhythmic medications. 
• Pregnancy test (all women of child-bearing potential) prior to remap 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 44 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 44 of 76 
 
 
• Cardiac rhythm as determined by a 12-lead ECG 
• Cardiac CT or MRI scan to assess the patency of the pulmonary veins 
• Cardioversions, ablations or hospital admissions since last visit 
• Heart failure status as assessed by NYHA classification at the time of visit 
3.12.6 
6-MonthVisit 
Subjects will return for an office visit 6 months (180 days ± 30 days) following the 
Index Procedure. The following data will be collected at the 6-Month Visit: 
• Adverse Events 
• Symptoms of recurrent arrhythmia 
• If either the post-Index Procedure or post-60-Day Remap Procedure 
fluoroscopies indicated diminished phrenic nerve response, and resolution has 
not been previously demonstrated, a repeat fluoroscopic examination. Females 
of childbearing potential undergoing this examination will also receive a 
pregnancy test prior. 
• Data regarding the use, changes in or discontinuation of anticoagulation, rate 
control and/or antiarrhythmic medications 
• Cardiac rhythm as determined by a 12-lead ECG at the time of the visit 
• Arrythmia assessment (See Section 3.11.4, Arrhythmia Core Lab). 
o A 24-hour continuous ECG monitor and training will be provided to the 
subject 
o Event Monitor compliance will be reviewed for weekly scheduled and ad 
hoc symptomatic monitoring and retraining of the subject provided as 
needed 
• Cardioversions, ablations or hospital admissions since last visit 
• Heart failure status as assessed by NYHA classification at the time of visit 
3.12.7 
12-MonthVisit 
Subjects will return for an office visit 12 months (365 days ± 30 days) following the 
Index Procedure. At a minimum, the following data will be collected at the 12-Month 
Visit: 
• Adverse Events 
• Symptoms of recurrent arrhythmia 
• If either the post-Index Procedure or post-60-Day Remap Procedure 
fluoroscopies indicated diminished phrenic nerve response, and resolution has 
not been previously demonstrated, a repeat fluoroscopic examination. Females 
of childbearing potential undergoing this examination will also receive a 
pregnancy test prior. 
• Data regarding the use, changes in or discontinuation of anticoagulation, rate 
control and/or antiarrhythmic medications. 
• Cardiac rhythm as determined by a 12-lead ECG at the time of the visit 
• Arrythmia assessment (See Section 3.11.4, Arrhythmia Core Lab). 
o A 24-hour continuous ECG monitor will be provided to the subject. 
o Instructions for returning the Event Monitor will be provided 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 45 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 45 of 76 
 
 
• Cardioversions, ablations or hospital admissions since last visit 
• Heart failure status as assessed by NYHA classification at the time of visit 
3.12.8 
Unscheduled Visits 
Any unscheduled follow-up visits that occur throughout the study, other than routine 
follow-up visits per the institution’s or investigator’s normal standard of care, shall be 
documented. At the minimum, the following data will be collected: 
• Adverse Events 
• Symptoms of recurrent arrhythmia 
• Cardiac rhythm as determined by a 12-lead ECG at the time of the visit 
• Event Monitor compliance will be reviewed for weekly scheduled and ad hoc 
symptomatic monitoring and retraining of the subject provided as needed. 
• Cardioversions, ablations or hospital admissions since last visit 
• Heart failure status as assessed by NYHA classification at the time of visit 

Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 46 of 76 
 
 
FARAPULSE , INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION C 
PAGE 46 of 76 
3.13 Schedule of Study Assessments 
Table 3. 
Summary of Study Assessments 
 
 
 
 
 
1 At investigator’s discretion 
2 If NIHSS score has increased by 2 or more points or if clinical suspicion of stroke/TIA 
3If the Index Procedure or Remap Procedure study indicated decreased phrenic nerve function and resolution has not yet been demonstrated. 
4 As required for females of childbearing potential undergoing fluoroscopic examination of the diaphragm 
Assessment 
Baseline 
Procedure 
Pre-Discharge 
30-Days Post- 
Procedure (± 7 
days) 
60-Days (± 15 days) 
6-Month 
(180 ± 30 
days) 
12-Month 
(365 ± 30 
days) 
Unscheduled 
Medical History, CHA2DS2-VASc 
X 
AFD and Anticoagulant Medications 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Symptoms of recurrent arrhythmia 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
History of cardioversions, ablations, 
hospital admissions since last visit 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Pregnancy test (for females of 
childbearing potential) 
X 
X 
X 
X4 
X4 
12-lead ECG 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
24-Hour Continuous ECG Monitor 
(e.g., Holter) 
X 
X 
Cardiac CT/MRI for LA and PV 
dimensions 
X 
X 
Mediastinal MRI 
X1 
TEE or other imaging modality (to 
exclude left atrial thrombus) 
X 
Electroanatomical Mapping 
X 
X 
Event Monitor readiness/compliance 
X 
X 
X 
X 
NIHSS 
X 
X 
Neurologic exam 
X2 
NYHA Classification 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Fluoroscopic Examination of 
Diaphragm 
X 
X if remapped, 
X3 if not 
X3 
X3 
Adverse Events 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Coronary assessment (e.g. 
angiography, FFR, IFR) with or w/o 
NTG administration1 
X 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 47 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 47 of 76 
 
 
4. Benefit Risk Assessment 
The Sponsor has conducted an analysis of the benefits and risks of the 
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF and ablation procedure as 
described below. The conclusion of this review is that the subject investigation is 
justified because the overall potential benefit to the population outweighs the risks. 
4.1 
Potential Adverse Events 
The following anticipated adverse events have been identified as possible 
complications of percutaneous atrial fibrillation ablation procedures in general as 
well as with the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF: 
• Access site complications (e.g., hematoma, pseudo-aneurysm, laceration, 
bleeding) potentially requiring surgical intervention 
• Air embolism 
• Allergic reaction or fever resulting from contact with catheters 
• Anemia 
• Arrhythmia, potentially requiring cardioversion, defibrillation, or rhythm 
management device 
• Arteriovenous fistulae 
• Back pain 
• Bed sores 
• Bleeding, hematoma, hemorrhage or aneurysm at vascular access sites 
• Blood pressure changes including hypotension or hypertension 
• Coronary artery or vein injury 
• Cardiac tamponade or perforation 
• Cardiac arrest or cardiac failure 
• Catheter entrapment 
• Cardiogenic shock 
• Conduction system injury resulting in sinus arrest or heart block, either 
transient or permanent, potentially requiring pacemaker insertion 
• Congestive heart failure 
• Death 
• Drug allergic reaction or side effects (e.g., from contrast, steroids, analgesics, 
anesthetics, anticoagulants, sedatives, etc.) 
• Embolism due to presence of thrombus or introduction of air 
• Esophageal injury, ulcer or fistula 
• Hemorrhage 
• Hemodynamic compromise 
• Hemopericardium 
• Hemoperitoneum 
• Hemothorax 
• Local infection, systemic infection, and/or sepsis 
• Muscle contractions due to electric stimulation 
• Myocardial infarction / transient ischemia 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 48 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 48 of 76 
 
 
• Nerve damage 
• Organ failure 
• Pain 
• Perforation (e.g., of diaphragm, liver, lung, and/or vessels). 
• Pericardial irritation 
• Pericardial effusion 
• Pericarditis 
• Peritonitis 
• Phrenic nerve injury with paralysis of the diaphragm and breathing 
impairment 
• Pneumomediastinum 
• Pneumopericardium 
• Pneumoperitoneum 
• Pneumothorax 
• Pulmonary vein injury or stenosis 
• Risk of cancer or birth defect/harm to fetus from x-ray exposure 
• Skin burns/irritation from x-ray exposure 
• Stroke/transient ischemic attack 
• Surgical procedure to remove retained catheter 
• Thrombosis 
• Vessel damage, dissection, or occlusion. 
4.2 
Potential Risks 
As detailed in Section 1.4, Summary of FARAPULSE Clinical Studies, the risk 
profile associated with the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus- 
PersAF and the ablation procedure is expected to be consistent with similar devices 
currently in clinical use for percutaneous cardiac ablation for treatment of persistent 
atrial fibrillation. 
The FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is a Pulsed Electric 
Field (PEF) ablation system that produces continuous transmural cardiac lesions to 
treat atrial fibrillation using an ablation procedure that is similar to other 
commercially available percutaneous ablation catheters. More specifically: 
• The device system is used during percutaneous endocardial ablation procedures 
like other commercially approved catheter systems. 
• The device system is composed of similar biocompatible materials. 
• The device system is a non-thermal ablation technology with targeted cardiac 
tissue specific mechanism of ablation. 
• The device uses the standard percutaneous techniques for ablation procedures. 
• The device utilizes a standard irreversible electroporation generator to deliver 
energy in the form of ablation dose. 
A fundamental difference between the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System 
Plus-PersAF and other commercially approved atrial fibrillation ablation systems is 
that the Pulsed Electric Field or irreversible electroporation energy is delivered 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 49 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 49 of 76 
 
 
through electrodes embedded in the endocardial ablation catheter for delivery of 
such energy in the pulmonary veins. 
As such, the potential risks are roughly equivalent to those associated with 
commercially released systems being used for percutaneous cardiac ablation 
procedures. Currently, the complication rates for commercially available catheters 
are low and have declined as physicians have continued to learn more about cardiac 
ablation techniques. Furthermore, FARAPULSE, Inc. has conducted bench and in- 
vivo testing to ensure safe use of the device during clinical investigation and is in 
compliance with the applicable requirements of the Medical Device Directive 
93/42/EEC. 
4.3 
Potential Benefits 
There are no guaranteed benefits from participation in this study. Information 
gained from the conduct of this study may also be of benefit to other persons with 
the same medical condition. 
A study of up to 90 patients for assessment in this protocol will have the following 
potential benefits: 
• To provide treatment to subjects with PersAF using an investigational 
device which has demonstrated the ability to isolate pulmonary veins and 
reduce the subsequent occurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation in a 
small number of patients treated for PAF (see Section 1.4, Summary of 
FARAPULSE Clinical Studies); 
• To generate additional data demonstrating that the endocardial creation of 
electrically isolating lesions via Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) catheter ablation 
applied using the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF 
is a safe and potentially effective treatment for drug-resistant, recurrent, 
symptomaticpersistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF); 
• To assess the feasibility and safety of the FARAPOINT Pulsed Field 
Ablation Catheter for focal ablation in accordance with its proposed 
indication for use; 
• To assess the protocol elements and design for subsequent use in an 
expanded multi-center European CE Mark Trial. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 50 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 50 of 76 
 
 
5. Statistical Analysis and Reporting 
A Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) will be prepared that governs the collection, 
analysis and reporting of the data from this investigation. This section summarizes 
the essential elements of that plan. 
5.1 
General Statistical Considerations 
All statistical analyses will be performed using validated statistical software. 
Continuous variables will be summarized using standard quantitative statistics: 
number of available observations, mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles and 
range (minimum and maximum observed values). The number of missing 
observations will also be specified. 
Categorical variables will be summarized using classical frequency statistics: 
number of available observations and percentages by categories. Percentages will 
be calculated on the number of available observations. The number of missing 
observations will also be specified. 
When applicable, bilateral asymptotic or exact confidence intervals for binomial 
distributions will be calculated at the 95% level. 
A full data listing will be prepared. Data will be pooled from all study sites. 
All related and resulting reports, documents and data will be produced and 
maintained in such a way as to ensure their control and the protection of subject 
privacy as far as is reasonably practicable. Data files and analytic reports will be 
archived according to requisite regulatory standards. 
5.2 
Control of Systematic Error and Bias 
Subjects are not randomized in this single arm study and therefore masking is not 
achievable. Error and bias are being controlled by several means, including a 
comprehensive set of study procedures as defined in the protocol to ensure 
consistent management and outcome measure assessment. Follow-up Holter 
monitoring and event monitoring data, and all MRI/CT dimensions of PVs, will be 
assessed objectively by third parties according to standard clinical protocols. 
Primary effectiveness and safety outcomes will be reviewed by an independent 
Clinical Events – Data Monitoring Committee (CEDMC). A complete Study 
Report will allow scientific and clinical reviewers to independently assess potential 
error and bias. 
Study outcomes will be reviewed and adjudicated by an independent Clinical 
Events and Data Monitoring Committee (CEDMC) more fully described in Section 
9.10, Clinical Events and Data Monitoring Committee. 
5.3 
Sample Size Justification 
This investigation is the next phase of ongoing feasibility studies to allow the 
controlled introduction of a new cardiac ablation catheter (FARAPOINT Pulsed 
Field Ablation Catheter). This is a feasibility study with no formal hypothesis 
testing and therefore no required sample size. Study results will be presented using 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 51 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 51 of 76 
 
 
descriptive statistics. Results from this study will be used to inform and design 
additional clinical studies. 
Ninety (90) subjects at up to four sites will allow the assessment of the modified 
devices and the initial experience and training of investigators and study staff at a 
new investigational site. 
5.4 
Subject Disposition 
The disposition of all subjects enrolled in the study will be described in tables and 
diagrams, including numbers screened, treated and assessed at each scheduled 
follow-up interval. Subjects who do not complete the study will be enumerated and 
the reason(s) for their discontinuation will be described. 
5.5 
Imputation for Missing Data 
Imputations for missing data in (e.g., withdrawn subjects, loss to follow-up, missing 
data) will not be performed. Analyses will be performed with all available data 
only. 
5.6 
Populations for Analysis 
Enrolled Population: all subjects who provided their informed consent. 
Safety Subjects/Intent to Treat Subjects: all enrolled subjects except those who 
terminate their participation prior to the beginning of the Index Procedure. 
Per Protocol Subjects: Intent-to-treatsubjects for whom the Index Procedure is 
finished without interfering investigational device deficiency or malfunction. 
Reasons for exclusion from the populations will be given, and a summary of 
adverse events for these subjects, if any, will be provided. 
5.7 
Final Clinical Report 
A final clinical report including these analyseswill be prepared at the conclusion of 
the study or at such time as the study may be prematurely terminated. Copies of the 
final report will be provided to the investigator and their EC and to the CA as 
applicable. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 52 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 52 of 76 
 
 
6. Outcome Measures 
6.1 
Primary Safety Endpoint 
The primary safety endpoint for this study is the Composite Safety Endpoint (CSE) 
defined as the incidence of the following early-onset and late-onset serious adverse 
events (SAEs) which are device- or procedure-related, as adjudicated by the 
CEDMC and defined below in Table 4. Composite Safety Endpoint Definitions. 
Early onset (within 30 days of an Index or Remap Procedure) 
- 
Death 
- 
Myocardial infarction (MI) 
- 
Persistent diaphragmatic paralysis 
- 
Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) 
- 
Peripheral or organ thromboembolism 
- 
Pericarditis 
- 
Cardiac tamponade / perforation 
- 
Vascular access complications requiring intervention 
- 
Heart block 
Late onset (any time during follow-up through 12 months) 
- 
Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis (> 70% diameter reduction from baseline) 
- 
Atrio-esophageal fistula 
 
Table 4. 
Composite Safety Endpoint Definitions 
 
Adverse Event 
Description/Criteria 
Death 
Death 
Myocardial infarction (MI) 
Myocardial infarction will be demonstrated by any one of the 
following: 
1) detection of ECG changes indicative of new ischemia (new 
ST-T wave changes or new LBB) that persist for more than 1 
hour. 
2) development of new pathological Q waves on an ECG 
3) imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new 
regional wall motion abnormality 
Persistent diaphragmatic 
paralysis 
Diaphragmatic paralysis: Change from baseline diaphragmatic 
function as demonstrated radiographically by elevation of the 
diaphragm above the normal range but not due to a pulmonary 
process such as atelectasis. 
Permanent: not resolved by completion of study follow-up 
Stroke or transient ischemic 
attack (TIA) 
Stroke is an acute symptomatic episode of neurological 
dysfunction attributed to a vascular cause (ischemia or 
hemorrhage) in which symptoms last more than 24 hours, or if 
symptoms last less than 24 hours, a brain imaging study 
demonstrates infarction. 
Transient ischemic attack is a new focal neurological deficit 
with rapid symptom resolution always within 24 hours. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 53 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 53 of 76 
 
 
 
Adverse Event 
Description/Criteria 
Peripheral or organ 
thromboembolism 
Formation in a blood vessel of a clot (thrombus) that results 
from the breaking loose of all or part of an existing thrombus, 
which is then carried by the blood to lodge in/occlude a more 
distal vascular site. 
Pericarditis 
Inflammation of the pericardial space that results in an effusion 
that leads to hemodynamic compromise or required 
pericardiocentesis, prolongs hospitalization by more than 48 
hours, requires hospitalization, or persists for more than 30 days 
following the ablation procedure. 
Cardiac 
tamponade/perforation 
The development of a significant pericardial effusion during or 
within 30 days of undergoing the index AF ablation procedure. 
A significant pericardial effusion is one which results in 
hemodynamic compromised (<80mmHg systolic bp), requires 
elective or urgent pericardiocentesis, or results in a 1cm or more 
pericardial effusion as documented by echocardiography. 
Vascular access 
complications requiring 
intervention 
Vascular access complication (e.g. groin hematoma, AV fistula, 
pseudoaneurysm) requiring intervention (e.g. surgical repair, 
blood transfusion). 
Heart block 
Impairment of AV conduction requiring permanent pacing 
intervention, if resulting from inappropriate ablation application. 
Pulmonary vein (PV) 
stenosis 
>70% diameter reduction of pulmonary vein from baseline 
CT/MRA scan. 
Atrio-esophageal fistula 
Connection between the atrium and the lumen of the esophagus 
as evidenced by documentation of esophageal erosion combined 
with evidence of a fistulous connection to the atrium. 
 
6.2 
Secondary Safety Endpoints 
1. The Primary Safety Endpoint assessed at 7 rather than 30 days 
2. The proportion of subjects witha device- or procedure-related SAE 
3. The proportion of subjects with stroke or TIA 
4. The proportion of subjects requiring cardioversion 
5. The proportion of subjects requiring an arrhythmia-related hospitalization 
6.3 
Primary Feasibility Endpoint 
The proportion of subjects that achieve Acute Procedural Success (APS) defined as 
the percutaneous endocardial creation of a complete, electrically isolating set of 
lesions around the ostia of the pulmonary veins (PVI) using the FARAPULSE 
Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF during the Index Procedure, as clinically 
assessed by entrance and/or exit block performed ≥ 20 minutes after the last PVI 
lesion is made. 
6.4 
Secondary Feasibility Endpoints 
1. The proportion of subjects who undergo the protocol-specified 60-Day 
Remapping Procedure and achieve Chronic Procedural Success (CPS) defined 
as persistent electrical isolation of all initially ablated pulmonary veins. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 54 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 54 of 76 
 
 
Chronic Procedural Success will be subdivided by Index Procedure only CPS 
and Reablated CPS subjects. 
2. The proportion of attempted subjects that achieve Acute CTI Success, defined 
as the creation of bi-directional electrical block across the CTIusing the 
investigational devices. 
3. Durability of the CTI and/or other extra-PV lesion set(s), when applicable. 
Durability is defined as unaltered integrity of each such lesion assessed at the 
Remapping Procedure. 
4. The proportion of subjects that achieve Therapeutic Success, defined as 
freedom from: 
a. Post-Blanking Period through assessment: occurrence of AF, AFL or AT, 
or ablation for AF/AFL/AT using the study device 
b. At any time: ablation for AF/AFL/AT with a nonstudy device 
Therapeutic Success will be assessed from the end of the 90 Day Blanking 
Period through Months 6 and 12 and will be subdivided by on / off AFDs 
(Atrial Fibrillation Drugs) post-Blanking Period. 
6.5 
Additional Assessments 
1. Proportion of subjects with early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) by 90 
days after the initial study ablation. 
2. Time to Therapeutic Failure 
3. Proportion of all ablated pulmonary veins that are isolated at the Index 
Procedure using the study device. 
4. Proportion of all ablated pulmonary veins isolated using the study device 
during the Index Procedure that remain isolated at the 60-day Remapping 
Procedure. 
5. The proportion of attempted subjects that achieve Chronic CTI Success, 
defined as persistent bi-directional electrical block across the CTI as assessed 
at the 60-day remapping procedure. 
6. The proportion of attempted subjects that achieve Chronic Focal Success, 
defined as persistent electrical nonconductivity of extra-PV tissue targeted for 
ablation in the Index Procedure, excluding the CTI 
6.6 
Procedural Assessments 
1) Assessments of duration for procedure components: 
a. Procedure time (initiation of venous access to venous access closure) 
b. Dwell time (sum of catheter entry-to-exit durations for each cardiac 
chamber) 
c. Total ablation time (first ablation to last ablation) 
d. Fluoroscopy timeand dose (total durationand dose of exposure) 
2) Characterization of lesion sets: 
a. PVI ablations 
b. Extra-PV ablations, excluding CTI ablations 
c. CTI ablations 
d. Anomalous PV ablations 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 55 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 55 of 76 
 
 
7. Adverse Events, Device Effects, Malfunctions and Deficiencies 
(definitions from ISO 14155:2020) 
 
7.1 
Adverse Events 
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or 
injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in 
subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational 
medical device and whether anticipated or unanticipated. . 
NOTE 1 to entry: 
This definition includes events related to the investigational 
medical device or the comparator. 
NOTE 2 to entrey: 
This definition includes events related to the procedures 
involved. 
NOTE 3 to entry : 
For users or other persons, this definition is restricted to events 
related to the use of investigational medical devices or 
comparators. 
7.2 
Serious Adverse Events 
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is an adverse event that led to any of the 
following,: 
a) Death, 
b) Serious deterioration in the health of the subject, users or other persons as 
defined by one or more of the following: 
1) a life-threatening illness or injury, or 
2) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function including 
chronic diseases,, or 
3) in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or 
4) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury 
or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 
c) Fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect 
including physical or mental impairment. 
NOTE 1 to entry: 
Planned hospitalization for a pre-existing condition, or a 
procedure required by the CIP, without serious deterioration in 
health, is not considered a serious adverse event. 
7.3 
Device Effects 
7.3.1 
Adverse Device Effects 
An Adverse Device Effect (ADE) is an adverse event related to the use of an 
investigational medical device 
NOTE 1 to entry : 
This definition includes adverse events resulting from 
insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, deployment, 
implantation, installation, or operation, or any malfunction of the 
investigational medical device. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 56 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 56 of 76 
 
 
NOTE 2 to entry: 
This definition includes any event resulting from use error or 
from intentional misuse of the investigational medical device. 
NOTE 3 to entry: 
this includes ‘comparator’ if the comparator is a medical device. 
. 
7.3.2 
Serious Adverse Device Effects 
A Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) is an adverse device effect (ADE) that 
has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of a Serious Adverse Event. 
(SAE). 
7.3.3 
Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects 
An Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) is a serious adverse 
device effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has not been 
identified in the current risk assessment 
NOTE 1 to entry: 
Anticipated serious adverse device effect (ASADE) is an effect 
which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has been 
identified in the risk assessment. 
7.4 
Device Deficiencies 
A Device Deficiency is an inadequacy of an investigational medical device related 
to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, usability, safety or performance. 
NOTE 1 to entry: 
Device deficiencies include malfunctions, use errors, and 
inadequacy in the information supplied by the manufacturer 
including labelling. 
 
NOTE 2 to entry: 
This definition includes device deficiencies related to the 
investigational medical device or the comparator. 
 
7.5 
Use Errors 
An Use Error is a user action or lack of user action while using the medical device 
that leads to a different result than that intended by the manufacturer or expected by 
the user 
NOTE 1 to entry: 
Use error includes the inability of the user to complete a task 
NOTE 2 to entry: 
Use errors can result from a mismatch between the 
characteristics of the user, user interface, task or use 
environment. 
NOTE 3 to entry: 
Users might be aware or unaware that a use error has 
occurred. 
NOTE 4 to entry: 
An unexpected physiological response of the patient is not 
by itself considered a use error. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 57 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 57 of 76 
 
 
NOTE 5 to entry: 
A malfunction of a medical device that causes an 
unexpected result is not considered a use error. 
 
7.6 
Malfunctions 
A Malfunction is a failure of an investigational medical device to perform in 
accordance with its intended purpose when used in accordance with the instructions 
for use or CIP, or IB. 
 
 
 
7.7 
Causality Relationship (definitions from MDCG 2020-10/1) 
The investigator will assess the causality of all adverse events in relation to the 
investigational device or any other study-related procedures according to four 
different levels of causality: 
1) Not related: relationship to the device, comparator or procedures can be excluded 
when: 
- 
the event has no temporal relationship with the use of the investigational 
device or the procedures related to application of the investigational device ; 
- 
the serious advserse event does not follow a known response pattern to the 
medical device (if the response pattern is previously known) and is 
biologically implausible; 
- 
the discontinuation of medical device application or the reduction of the 
level of activation/exposure - when clinically feasible – and reintroduction 
of its use (or increase of the level of activation/exposure), do not impact on 
the serious event; 
- 
the event involves a body-site or an organ not expected to be affected by the 
device or procedure; 
- 
the serious event can be attributed to another cause (e.g. an underlying or 
concurrent illness/ clinical condition, an effect of another device, drug, 
treatment or other risk factors); 
- 
the event does not depend on a false result given by the investigational 
device used for diagnosis, when applicable; 
In order to establish the non-relatedness, not all the criteria listed above might be 
met at the same time, depending on the type of device/procedures and the serious 
event. 
 
3) Possible: the relationship with the use of the investigational device or 
comparator, or the relationship with procedure is weak but cannot be ruled out 
completely. Alternative causes are also possible (e.g. an underlying or concurrent 
illness/ clinical condition or/and an effect of another device, drug or treatment). 
Cases were relatedness cannot be assessed or no information has been obtained 
should also be classified as possible. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 58 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 58 of 76 
 
 
4) Probable: the relationship with the use of the investigational device or 
comparator, or the relationship with procedures, seems relevant and/or the event 
cannot reasonably have explained by another cause. 
5) Causal relationship: the serious event is associated with the investigational 
device, comparator or or with procedures beyond reasonable doubt when: 
- 
the event is a known side effect of the product category the device belongs 
to or of similar devices and procedures; 
- 
the event has a temporal relationship with investigational device 
use/application or procedures; 
- 
the event involves a body-site or organ that 
▪ 
the investigational device or procedures are applied to; 
▪ 
the investigational device or procedures have an effect on; 
- 
the serious adverse event follows a known response pattern to the medical 
device (if the response pattern is previously known); 
- 
the discontinuation of medical device application (or reduction of the level 
of activation/exposure) and reintroduction of its use (or increase of the level 
of activation/exposure), impact on the serious event (when clinically 
feasible); 
- 
other possible causes (e.g. an underlying or concurrent illness/ clinical 
condition or/and an effect of another device, drug or treatment) have been 
adequately ruled out; 
- 
harm to the subject is due to error in use; 
In order to establish the relatedness, not all the criteria listed above might be met 
at the same time, depending on the type of device/procedures and the serious event. 
7.8 
Reporting 
AEs and SAEs: 
All AEs, including all SAEs, will be monitored from the time of enrollment through 
discharge for this study. All AEs must be documentedin the patient chart and 
recorded in theappropriate CRF. A description of the event, including the start date, 
resolution date, action taken and the outcome shall be provided along with the 
Investigator’s assessment of the seriousness of the event and the relationship 
between the AE and the study devices and/or procedures. 
All AEs should be followed until the event is resolved,judged to be chronically 
stable or 12 month study follow-up has been completed. The investigational site 
will provide relevant follow-up information to the Sponsor or designee upon 
request. 
The investigator shall also report to the Sponsor or its designee any Device 
Deficiencies or Malfunctions that did not but might have led to a SAE if such an 
event were to recur. 
The investigator shall notify the Sponsor and the designated CRO immediately and 
not later than 24 hours after the Investigatorhas become aware of an SAE or Device 
Deficiency / Malfunction that might have led to a SAE. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 59 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 59 of 76 
 
 
The Investigator shall report the SAE or Device Deficiency / Malfunction on the 
appropriate CRF. 
Should mail correspondence be necessary, documents can be sent to the following: 
Sponsor: 
FARAPULSE, Inc. 
Email: 
FarapulseAEDD.Safety@bsci.com 
 
Return of Subject Device: 
In all cases, and whenever possiblethe device involved in the AE, SAE, Device 
Deficiency / Malfunction as described above is to be returned to the Sponsor or 
Sponsor’s designee for analysis and investigation, as appropriate.The Study 
Coordinator shall contact the Sponsor for instructions on returning the device. 
Device Deficiencies and Malfunctions: 
All Device Deficiencies / Malfunctions that did not contribute and would not likely 
contribute to a SAE, shall be documented on the Device Deficiency / Malfunction 
CRF and submitted to the Sponsor within 7 days after the observed Device 
Deficiency / Malfunction. The Sponsor’s Quality Assurance function shall ensure an 
assessment is completed for each reported Device Deficiency / Malfunction. Such 
information shall be provided in the final clinical report. 
 
Reporting to Regulatory Authorities: 
Depending on the local requirements or following agreement between both parties, 
the Sponsor, its designated representative(CRO) or the Principal Investigator will 
be responsible for performing safety reporting to the Ethics Committee according to 
the relevant local regulatory requirements. 
 
The Sponsor or designated representative (CRO) will be responsible for reporting to 
the National Competent Authorities according to MDCG 2021-10/1 and national 
requirements. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 60 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 60 of 76 
 
 
8. Monitoring 
Clinical monitors, qualified by training and experience, will be responsible for 
monitoring and overseeing the conduct of the study in accordance with the Study 
Monitoring Plan. 
The clinical monitors will evaluate compliance with the protocol, any specific 
recommendations made by the site’s EC and the signed Investigator Agreement. 
Phone contacts and site visits will be conducted to ensure that the protocol is being 
followed and that any protocol deviations are properly documented. Clinical 
monitoring will include a verification that the ICF was properly obtained for all 
enrolled study participants, a review of clinical records for accuracy and 
completeness, resolution of missing or inconsistent results and a review of source 
documents. The clinical monitor will verify that the CRFs are in agreement with 
the source documentation and other records. The Investigator will make available 
to the clinical monitor for review all ICFs, all completed CRFs, source 
documentation and other relevant records for all enrolled subjects at the site. 
If a deficiency is noted during an on-site monitoring visit or at any other time 
during the course of the study, the clinical monitor is required to discuss the 
situation with the Investigator and the Sponsor to ensure compliance. 
The Sponsor or its designated representative, qualified by training and experience, 
will be responsible for monitoring and overseeing the conduct of the study. The 
accuracy of all collected data will be verified for: 
• Eligibility criteria 
• Baseline characteristics 
• Primary safety and feasibility endpoints 
• Secondary endpoints 
• Adverse events (including SAEs) and Device Deficiencies / Malfunction 
Reporting 
Verification will utilizesource documents including, but not limited to, medical 
records, office/ clinic notes, procedure reports, laboratory results, physician and 
nursing progress notes. Verification and quality of data, monitoring of clinical 
study progress and Investigator compliance with the approved protocol will be 
conducted by the Sponsor or its designated representative. 
The Sponsor or its designated representative must be allowed to visit the clinical 
site and have direct access to all study records throughout the duration of the study. 
The monitor will review all source data and compare them to the data documented 
in the CRFs, in addition to performing a review of the Regulatory Site Binder, and 
assessingdevice accountability. The Investigator and/ or institution will provide 
direct access to source data/ documents for study-related monitoring, audits, and 
regulatory review and inspection. 
It is important that the Investigator and other relevant site personnel, including the 
research study coordinator, are available for consultation with the clinical monitors 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 61 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 61 of 76 
 
 
during the monitoring visits and that sufficient time is devoted at the site for the 
monitoring process. 
Additionally, telephone, email contact, and onsite visits will be conducted on a 
regular basis with the Investigator and the site staff to ensure that the protocol is 
being followed and to address any issues that may occur during the study. 
If a deficiency is noted during the course of the study, the clinical monitor is 
required to discuss the situation with the site and the Sponsor (if required) to secure 
compliance. A Monitoring Site Visit Report will be issued to the Investigator and 
Sponsor. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 62 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 62 of 76 
 
 
9. Study Management 
The Sponsor has overall responsibility for the conduct of the study according to 
Good Clinical Practice Guidelines (ICH E6 Consolidated Guidance to Good 
Clinical Practice) as well as any conditions imposed by local and national 
regulatory authorities. 
For the subject investigation, the Sponsor will have direct responsibilities and will 
delegate other responsibilities to appropriate and qualified consultants, contractors 
and/ or CROs. Together, the Sponsor, consultants and CRO will ensure that the 
study is conducted according to the approved CIP, EC-approved ICFand all 
applicable governing regulations. All personnel to participate in the conduct of this 
clinical study will be qualified by education and/or experience to perform their 
tasks. 
9.1 
Key Contributors 
9.1.1 
Study Sponsor 
FARAPULSE, Inc. 
3715 Haven Ave. Suite 110 
Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA 
Phone: 617-686-7661 
Email: Christopher.schneider@bsci.com 
9.1.2 
CRO 
ICON Clinical Research Ltd 
South County Business Park 
Leopardstown 
Dublin 18D18 X5R3 
Ireland 
Tel: +353 12 912000 
Fax: +353 12 476260 
9.1.3 
Arrhythmia Core Lab 
MDT – Medical Data Transfer, s.r.o. 
Zabrdovicka 2, 615 00 Brno 
Czech Republic 
Contact: Veronika Bolkova 
Tel: +420 725 069 195 
iowa@mdtekg.cz 
 
9.2 
Ethical Considerations 
It is expected that all parties will share in the responsibility for ethical conduct in 
accordance with their respective roles in the investigation. The Sponsor and the 
Investigatorshall avoid improper influence or inducement of the subject, monitor, 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 63 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 63 of 76 
 
 
other clinical investigator or other parties participating in or contributing to the 
clinical investigation. 
9.2.1 
Study Conduct 
The study will be performed in accordance with the relevant parts of the Code of 
Federal Regulations, ICH Guidelines for Good Clinical Practices, the European 
Standard ISO 14155, the Declaration of Helsinki, and any regional and/or national 
regulations. The clinical investigation shall not begin until the required approval 
has been obtained from the National CA and the local EC. Any additional 
requirements imposed by the regulatory authority or EC shall be followed. These 
principles shall prevail over interests of science and society and shall be 
understood, observed and applied at every step in this clinical investigation. 
9.2.2 
Ethics Review 
Before any subject can be enrolled in this study, the local or national EC and the 
CA must review and approve the CIP and the ICFto be used. A subject cannot be 
asked to sign the ICFuntil the study has been fully approved by the institution’s 
EC and by the CA, if applicable. The Sponsor or their designated CROwill 
require a copy of any EC correspondence, as well as the final EC approval letter 
and the final EC-approved ICF, and approvals for the CIP and ICF revisions on 
amendments from the EC. The Sponsor or their designated CROwill keep all of 
the CA correspondence, as well as the CA approval letter. 
9.2.3 
Informed Consent 
Subjects will not sign the ICFuntil the study has been fully approved by the 
institution’s Ethics Committee and the Sponsor or their designated CRO has 
received and reviewed the specific EC-approved ICF. When the Investigator has 
determined the eligibility of a specific subject to enter the study, the ICF must be 
completed. The ICF must be read and understood by the subject, the subject’s 
questions answered, and the form signed by the subject before any study-related 
procedures can be performed. All subjects are to receive copies of their signed 
ICF. 
9.2.4 
Coverage of Expenses 
Study participants will be reimbursed for travel costs related to study hospital 
visits. 
9.2.5 
Confidentiality 
Confidentiality of subjects will be maintained throughout the study. A unique 
identification code will be assigned to each subject participating in this study. 
Any data that may be published in abstracts, scientific journals, or presented at 
medical meetings will reference a unique subject code and will not reveal the 
subject’s identity. The Sponsor,CRO, Investigators and Site personnelwill make 
every reasonable effort to protect the confidentiality of all subjects participating in 
the study. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 64 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 64 of 76 
 
 
9.3 
Insurance 
The Sponsor will maintain the appropriate and necessary insurance coverage for the 
duration of the study. 
9.4 
Audits and Inspections 
The Principal Investigator will also allow representatives of the governing EC,CA, 
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and other applicable regulatory agencies to 
inspect all study records, CRFs, and corresponding portions of the subject’s office 
and/or hospital medical records at regular intervals throughout the study. These 
inspections are for the purpose of verifying adherence to the CIP, completeness and 
exactness of the data being entered onto the CRFs and compliance with regulatory 
agency regulations. 
The Principal Investigator will inform the Sponsor or the Sponsor’s designee should 
they be audited or inspected by any regulatory agencies. The Sponsor or the 
Sponsor’s designee will also inform the site if they are made aware of a pending 
audit or inspection by a regulatory agency. 
9.5 
Sponsor Responsibilities 
Sponsor has the overall responsibility for the study and will: 
• Select qualified Investigators, clinical investigators and study sites. 
• Select qualified monitors. 
• Provide the CIP and any subsequent amendments. 
• Provide appropriate information and Investigational system training to the 
Investigator and study site staff. 
• Ensure that all deviations from the CIP are reviewed with the appropriate 
Investigator(s) and reported on the CRFs and the final clinical report and that 
any necessary preventative or corrective action is taken. 
• Ensure that all AEs and all ADEs are reported and reviewed with the 
Investigator(s), and where appropriate, that all SAEs and all SADEs are 
appropriately reported. 
• Ensure that all Device Deficiencies / Malfunctions are reviewed by the 
Sponsor, and properly assessed and investigated, as appropriate. 
• Promptly inform the Investigator and where applicable, any regulatory 
authorities, if the study is prematurely terminated or suspended and the reason 
for the termination or suspension. 
• Ensure proper device usage, uniform data collection and protocol compliance. 
• Provide site initiation training to include review of the FARAPULSE Pulsed 
Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF Instructions for Use, the Clinical 
Investigation Plan, CRFinstructions, CRFs, AE/SAE/Device Deficiency 
reportingand requirements for obtaining informed consent. 
• Provide the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF to the 
participating study site, in quantities to support study activities. 
• Coordinate ongoing communication with CROs, consultants and study site to 
resolve any problems concerning the protocol or data collection 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 65 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 65 of 76 
 
 
• Every effort will be made to ensure compliance with the protocol. 
• Retain ownership of all clinical data generated in this study and control the 
use of the data for purposes of regulatory submissions to CAs. 
• Protect subject confidentiality. 
• Provide Regulatory Site Binder to site. 
9.6 
Monitor Responsibilities 
Clinical monitors, qualified by training and experience, will be responsible for 
monitoring and overseeing the conduct of the study. 
Site Initiation Visit:Sponsor personnel and / or clinical monitors will conduct site 
initiation visits at the investigational site to ensure that the Principal Investigator 
and other investigational site personnel involved in the conduct of this investigation 
have received and understood the requirements and contents of this Clinical 
Investigation Plan, the Investigator’s Brochure, the patient ICF, the CRFs, CRF 
Instructions, AE/SAE/Device Deficiency reporting requirements, and the 
Instructions for Use and the Institution and/ or Investigator Agreement. 
Site Monitoring:The clinical monitors will conduct routine on-site monitoring 
visits and phone calls in accordance with a Study Monitoring Plan to evaluate 
compliance with the CIP, any specific recommendations made by the site’s EC and 
the signed Institution and/or Investigator Agreement and to ensure that the CIP is 
being followed and that any protocol deviations are properly documented on the 
respective CRF. Clinical monitoring will include a verification that informed 
consent was properly obtained and documented for all enrolled study participants, a 
review of clinical records and CRFsfor accuracy and completeness, resolution of 
missing or inconsistent results and a review of source documents. 
Clinical monitoring will include a review of all adverse events, SAEs and Device 
Deficiencies / Malfunctions to ensure that all information has been reported to the 
Sponsor, EC and regulatory authorities as required by the ClinicalInvestigational 
Plan and applicable standards and laws. 
The clinical monitor will verify that the CRFs are complete and in agreement with 
the source documentation and other records. The clinical monitor will ensure that 
all CRFs have been signed and dated by the Investigator. 
The Investigator will make available to the clinical monitor for review all ICFs, all 
CRFs, source documentation and other relevant records for all enrolled subjects at 
the site. It is important that the Investigator and other relevant site personnel are 
available for consultation with the clinical monitors during the monitoring visits 
and that sufficient time is devoted at the site for the monitoring process. 
If a deficiency is noted during an on-site visit or at any other time during the course 
of the study, the clinical monitor is required to discuss the situation with the 
Investigator and the Sponsor, and to subsequently monitor the implementation of 
corrective actions that are required to address the situation. 
All monitoring activities will be documented by the clinical monitor in a 
Monitoring Report and will include, at a minimum, the date, investigational site 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 66 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 66 of 76 
 
 
visited, names of all personnel involved in the visit, a listing of all documents 
reviewed and a summary of all findings, facts, deviations, conclusions and 
recommended actions to be taken. Key findings will be reviewed with the clinical 
investigator. 
Upon completion of the study, a study close out visit will be conducted to ensure 
that all data collection and study requirements are complete. 
9.7 
Investigator Responsibilities 
At a minimum, the following documents will be provided by the investigational site 
to the Sponsor prior to study start (consent of the first subject): 
• Signed Clinical Trial Agreements 
• Signed Financial Disclosure Form 
• Signed Clinical Investigation Plan Signature Page 
• Investigator and Co-Investigator’s current Curriculum Vitae 
• Any other additional documents as required by the Sponsor 
The Investigator is responsible for ensuring that the investigation is conducted 
according to all signed agreements, the CIP, governing regulations, data protection 
regulations, medical device laws, the Declaration of Helsinki and any other 
conditions imposed by the relevant regulatory authorities. The Investigator is 
responsible for maintaining medical and study records for every subject 
participating in the clinical study (including information maintained electronically 
such as digital imaging). The Investigator will also maintain original source 
documents from which study-related data are derived. 
The Investigator(s) shall be responsible for the day to day conduct of the 
investigation as well as for the safety and well-being of the human subjects 
involved in the clinical investigation. 
The Investigator(s) shall: 
• Have the qualified and trained resources to conduct the investigation properly. 
• Obtain from the Sponsor the information which the Investigator(s) judges 
essential about the device and be familiar with this information. 
• Be well acquainted with the CIP before signing the signature page. 
• Support the monitor, auditor, if applicable, in their activities to verify 
compliance with the CIP, to perform source data verification and to correct the 
CRF where inconsistencies or missing values are identified. 
• Discuss with the Sponsor management any question of modification of the CIP. 
• Make sure that the CIP is followed by all responsible for the conduct of the 
study at his/ her institution. Any deviation shall be documented and reported to 
the study Sponsor and CRO. 
• Make the necessary arrangements to ensure the proper conduct and completion 
of the investigation. 
• Make the necessary arrangements for emergency treatment, as needed, to 
protect the health and welfare of the subject. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 67 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 67 of 76 
 
 
• Ensure that appropriate EC and CA approval is obtained prior to the start of the 
investigation. 
• Inform Sponsor about adverse events and Device Deficiencies / Malfunctions in 
a timely manner; document on applicable CRFs. 
• Endeavor to ensure an adequate recruitment of subjects. 
• Ensure that the subject has adequate information and time to provide informed 
consent. 
• Ensure that informed consent is obtained and documented on the EC-approved 
ICF. 
• Ensure that clinical records are clearly marked to indicate that the subject is 
enrolled in this study. 
• Provide subjects with well-defined procedures for any emergency situation and 
safeguard the subject’s interest. Under these circumstances, deviations from the 
CIP shall not require the prior approval of the Sponsor or the national and local 
regulatory authorities. Such deviations shall not be considered as a breach of 
agreement but shall be documented and reported to Sponsor. 
• Ensure that information which becomes available as a result of the clinical 
investigation which may be of importance to the health of a subject and the 
continuation of the investigation shall be made known to the Sponsor and, if 
pertinent to the safety or well-being of the subject, and the private clinician. 
• Inform the subject and/ or the subject’s physician about any premature 
termination or suspension of the investigation with a rationale for study 
termination. 
• Have primary responsibility for the accuracy, legibility and security of all 
investigation data, documents and subject records both during and after the 
investigation. 
• Sign each subject’s CRF, as applicable. 
• Be responsible for the supervision and assignment of duties at his/ her clinical 
center. 
• 
Ensure that all investigational devices are kept in a secure location and that all 
Systems are accounted for on the Device Accountability Form (number of 
devices used, discarded and returned to Sponsor). 
• 
Investigator shall assign responsibility of Regulatory Site Binder and its 
maintenance to the Research Study Coordinator. 
9.8 
Investigator Training 
The participating investigator will be trained in the use of the FARAPULSE Pulsed 
Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF prior to participating in the study. Device 
training will be conducted by the Sponsor or its representatives. All device training 
will be documented in a training log that will be maintained in the Regulatory Site 
Binder. 
9.9 
Site Training 
To ensure accurate, complete and reliable data, the Sponsor or its representatives 
will provide instructional material to the site, as appropriate; instruct the 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 68 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 68 of 76 
 
 
investigator and study personnel on the CIP, the completion of the CRFs including 
CRF Instructions, and study procedures; communicate regularly with site personnel 
via mail, email, telephone, and/or fax; and make periodic monitoring visits to the 
site. During those visits, the Sponsor or its representatives will monitor the subject 
data recorded in the CRFs against the source documents at the site for all enrolled 
subjects. 
9.10 Clinical Events and Data Monitoring Committee 
The Sponsor has established an external group of expert physicians who are not 
investigators to serve as the Clinical Events and Data Monitoring Committee 
(CEDMC). This group will consist of a panel of 3 experienced, independent 
physicians who are not investigators and who will be supported by the Medical 
Monitor and Study Statistician. A combined CEDMC procedure is an appropriate 
structure for a 90 subject feasibility study. 
The CEDMC will review and approve a Charter. The CEDMC will convene during 
the study to screen, classify and adjudicate all adverse events reported in the subject 
investigation as well as major study outcomes.The CEDMC will be provided with 
case summaries,relevant source documents and any other information required to 
evaluate and adjudicate the adverse events and study outcomes. 
The CEDMC will alsoconvene to review safety data and trends during the conduct 
of the study. This formal assessment will occurat a minimumafter the enrollment of 
20 and then 90 subjects. The CEDMC will recommend to the Sponsor whether a 
study pause or termination is required if it identifies a trend that indicates a danger 
to patient safety. 
9.11 Data Management 
Data management procedures will be included in the Study Management Plan. 
CRFs will be made available to the participating site. Investigators are responsible 
for the accurate completion of patient CRFs during the study. The Investigator will 
ensure that complete, accurate and timely data on CRFs are completed, that 
protocol requirements are followed and that complications, adverse events and 
adverse device effects are correctly reported and investigated, as appropriate. The 
Investigator is expected to maintain all source documents as required by the CIP, 
including laboratory results, supporting medical records, and signed ICFs. The 
source documents will be used during the regular monitoring visits to verify 
information from the database against data contained on the completed CRFs. 
After CRF Monitoring has been complete and deficiencies / discrepancies resolved, 
CRFs will be provided to the Sponsor or CRO, and data from the study will be 
entered from the CRFs into a central database. CRF data will be reviewed to 
identify any inconsistent or missing data and any adverse events. Any data issues 
are to be promptly addressed with the Investigator by the CRO. 
9.12 Study Suspension or Early Termination 
The study can be discontinuedat any siteat the discretion of the Investigator or study 
Sponsor for reasons including, but not limited to, the following: 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 69 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 69 of 76 
 
 
• Occurrence of adverse events unknown to date in respect to their nature, severity, 
or duration, or the unexpected incidence of known adverse events. 
• Obtaining new scientific knowledge that shows that the study is no longer valid 
or necessary. 
• Data demonstrates a benefit to subjects who undergo percutaneous ablation with 
the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF making treatment 
without the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF unethical. 
• Insufficient recruitment of subjects. 
• Unanticipated adverse device effect (UADE) presenting an unreasonable risk to 
subjects (Sponsor may terminate the study immediately) 
• Persistent non-compliance with the Clinical Investigation Plan. 
• Persistent non-compliance with regulatory requirements. 
If the study is discontinued or suspended prematurely, the Sponsor shall promptly 
inform the clinical investigator/ investigational center of the termination or 
suspension and the reason(s) for discontinuation / suspension. The national and 
local regulatory authorities shall also be informed promptly and provided with the 
reason(s) for the termination or suspension by the Sponsor, CRO or by the clinical 
investigator/ investigation center. Further, if the study is discontinued or suspended 
prematurely, patients enrolled to that point will continue to be followed for safety 
through the 12-month timepoint. 
9.13 Criteria for Suspending/ Terminating a Study Center 
Sponsor reserves the right to stop the screening of subjects at the study center at any 
time after the study initiation visit if no subjects have been enrolled or if the center 
has multiple or severe protocol violations without justification or fails to follow 
remedial actions. 
Possible reasons for suspending/ terminating the study center include, but are not 
limited to: 
• Repeated failure to complete CRFsprior to scheduled monitoring visits; 
• Failure to obtain written informed consent using the EC-approved ICF; 
• Failure to report SAEs/ USADEs to Sponsor within 24 hours of knowledge; 
• Loss of (or unaccounted for) investigational product inventory or repeated failure 
of device accountability. 
9.14 Deviations from the Clinical Investigation Plan 
The Investigator is not allowed to deviate from the approved CIP except in 
emergency circumstances. 
The Investigator must notify the Sponsor and the CRO of any deviation from the 
CIP and document the reason for the deviation. 
The Investigator shall notify the Sponsor and the reviewing EC of any deviation 
from the CIP, as per national requirements, to protect the life or physical well-being 
of a subject in an emergency. Such notice shall be given as soon as possible, but in 
no event later than five (5) working days after the emergency occurred. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 70 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 70 of 76 
 
 
10. Regulatory Considerations 
10.1 Maintaining Records 
The Sponsor and CROwill maintain copies of critical correspondence, regulatory 
approvals, Trial Master Files, clinical data, shipment of devices, adverse events, 
serious adverse events, serious adverse device effects and other records related to 
the clinical study. 
Trial records will be maintained for a minimum of 3 years following the completion 
of research activities and closure of the study with Ethics Committees, whichever is 
longer. 
10.2 Data Handling and Record Keeping 
10.2.1 
Source Documents 
The Investigator must maintain detailed source documents on all subjects who are 
enrolled or who undergo screening in the study. Source documents include but 
are not limited to, subject medical records, hospital charts, clinic charts, 
investigator subject study files, as well as the results of diagnostic tests (e.g., 
laboratory tests, hemodynamic studies). 
The following minimum information should be entered into the subject’s medical 
record: 
• The date the subject entered the study and the subject number. 
• The Clinical Investigation Plan number and the name of the Sponsor. 
• The date that Informed Consent was obtained and signed by the patient and 
Investigator. 
• Evidence that the subject meets the study eligibility requirements (e.g., 
medical history, study procedures and/or evaluations). 
• The dates of all study related subject visits. 
• Evidence that required procedures and/or evaluations were completed. 
• Use of any concurrent medications. 
• Documentation of specific device used. 
• Occurrence and status of any adverse events (AEs / SAEs) 
• The date the subject exited the study and a notation as to whether the subject 
completed the study or was discontinued, including the reason for 
discontinuation. 
10.2.2 
Data Collection 
The Investigator must maintain detailed records on all subjects who sign the ICF 
and begin the pre-procedure evaluation. Data for enrolled subjects is transcribed 
onto CRFs provided by the Sponsor or designee. All data should be transcribed 
completely, promptly and legibly. Corrections should be made in a manner that 
does not obscure or eliminate the original error, by striking through the original 
data with one line, and initialing and dating the change, along with the reason for 
the change (if not obvious). Original CRF pages will be collected by the Sponsor 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 71 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 71 of 76 
 
 
or Sponsor’s designee after they are reviewed by the study monitor. The 
investigator should maintain a copy of all completed CRFs from this study. 
Study exit forms will be completed for all enrolled subjects, regardless if they did 
or did not complete thestudy (e.g., subject discontinuation, study termination). 
The Sponsor and investigational site will maintain all records pertaining to this 
study in accordance with local and national regulations. Prior to the destruction 
of study records the Investigator or his representative shall contact the Sponsor to 
ensure that they no longer need to be retained. In addition, Sponsor shall be 
contacted if the Investigator plans to leave the investigational site so that 
arrangements can be made for the handling or transfer of study records. 
10.3 Ethics Committee and Competent Authority Approval 
Regulatory approvals must be obtained prior to enrollment of the first patient. The 
Sponsor is responsible for obtaining regulatory and local approvals for the study. 
The Sponsor or its designated representative will require a copy of any IC and CA 
correspondence, as well as the final approval letter from the EC and CA, where 
applicable. 
An Investigator may not make CIP changes without prior approval by the Sponsor. 
All significant CIP changes that may affect the following must be submitted and 
approved by the EC and CA before initiating the change: 
• Validity of the data or information resulting from the completion of the approved 
CIP 
• Relationship of the likely subject risk to benefit relied upon to approve the CIP 
• Scientific soundness of the CIP 
• Rights, safety, or welfare of the human subjects involved in the investigation 
The Sponsor will notify the investigational site of such changes to ensure the study 
continues to be conducted consistentwith the approved CIP. 
10.4 Procedure for Amending the CIP 
The process of amending the CIP and/or related documents is the 
responsibility of the sponsor. The procedure for amending the CIP shall be as 
follows: 
• The Sponsor, Investigator, or other relevant party (e.g. EC, CA, CEDMC) may 
recommend modification of the CIP. 
• The Sponsor will then modify as necessary the CIP and any associated documents 
requiring amendment as a result of the modification(s). 
• The Sponsor or designated CRO will then submit the revised CIP and any other 
affected documents to the EC and CA for approval, per regulation. 
• Once all required approvals are obtained, the site will be trained to the latest 
approved version of the CIP and any other affected documents. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 72 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 72 of 76 
 
 
10.5 Device Accountability 
The Investigator is responsible for maintaining a Device Accountability Log that 
will track device receipt, device usage for all subjects and device returns to Sponsor 
or designees. Information tracked will include date of device usage, subject ID, and 
lot number. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 73 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 73 of 76 
 
 
11. Publication Policy 
The existence of this clinical study is confidential, and it should not be discussed 
with persons outside of the study. Additionally, the information in this document 
and regarding this study contains trade secrets and commercially sensitive 
information that is confidential and may not be disclosed unless such disclosure is 
required by regional or national law or regulations. Subject to the foregoing, this 
information may be disclosed only to those persons involved in the study who have 
a need to know, but all such persons must be instructed not to further disseminate 
this information to others. These restrictions of disclosure will apply equally to all 
future information supplied to you that is indicated as confidential. 
The data generated by this clinical study are the property of the Sponsor and should 
not be disclosed without the prior written permission of FARAPULSE, Inc. These 
data may be used by FARAPULSE, Inc. now and in the future for presentation or 
publication at FARAPULSE, Inc.’s discretion or for submission to governmental 
regulatory agencies. FARAPULSE, Inc. reserves the right of prior review of any 
publication or presentation of data from the subject investigation. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 74 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 74 of 76 
 
 
12. Bibliography 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 75 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 75 of 76 
 
 
 
1 
Page RL. Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation. New England Journal of 
Medicine, 351(23):2408–16, 2004. 
2 
Feinberg WM, Cornell ES, Nightingale SD, et al. Relationship between 
Prothrombin Activation Fragment F1.2 and International Normalized Ratio in 
Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation 
3 
Fuster, V, Ryden, L, Asinger, R, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the 
Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary. J Am 
CollCardiol, 2001;38:1231-65. 
4 
Go AS, Hylek EM, and et al. Phillips KA. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial 
fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke 
prevention: the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (atria) 
study. JAMA, 285:2370–5, 2001. 
5 
Miyasaka Y., Barnes ME., et al. Secular Trends in Incidence of Atrial 
Fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and Implications on 
the Projections for Future Prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114:119-125. 
6 
Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk 
factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983– 8. 
7 
Le Heuzey JY, Paziaud O, Piot O, et al. Cost of care distribution in atrial 
fibrillation patients: the COCAF study. Am Heart J 2004;147:121– 6. 
8 
Calkins, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter 
and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, 
Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up. Heart Rhythm 2017; 14:e275-444. 
9 
Mont L, et al. Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of 
persistentatrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA 
study). EurHeart J 2014;35(8):501–507 
10 
Al-Sakere B, Andre´ F, et al. Tumor Ablation with Irreversible 
Electroporation. PLoS ONE 2(11): e1135. 
11 
Neumcke, B., Walz, D., L~uger, P. 1970. Non linear effects in lipid bilayer 
membranes. III. The dissociation field effect. Biophys. J. 10:172 
12 
Benz R, Beckers F, Zimmermann U. Reversible electrical breakdown of lipid 
bilayer membranes: a charge-pulse relaxation study. J Membr Biol. 1979 Jul 
16;48(2):181-204. 
13 
Chang, D. C. 1989a. Cell poration and cell fusion using an oscillating 
electric field. Biophys. J. 56:641-652. 
14 
D.C. Chang, T.S. Reese Changes in membrane structure induced by 
electroporation as revealed by rapid-freezing electron microscopy. 
Biophysical Journal, Volume 58, Issue 1, July 1990, Pages –12 
15 
WendlerJJ, Pech M, Blaschke S et al (2012) Angiography in the isolated 
perfused kidney: radiological evaluation of vascular protection in tissue 
ablation by nonthermal irreversible electroporation. 
CardiovascInterventRadiol 35:383–390 
16 
Gehl J1, Skovsgaard T, Mir LM. Vascular reactions to in vivo 
electroporation: characterization and consequences for drug and gene 
delivery. BiochimBiophysActa. 2002 Jan 15;1569(1-3):51-8. 

FARAPULSE, INC. 
PROTOCOL NO. CS1543, REVISION B 
PAGE 76 of 76 
Released 
E.D: 27/Oct/2022 
PersAFOne III Clinical Protocol for PFA System Plus PersAF 
Boston Scientific Confidential. Unauthorized use is prohibited. 
CS1543-HO C.2 
Page 76 of 76 
 
 
 
17 
KinghamTP, Karkar AM, D’Angelica MI et al (2012) Ablation of perivascular 
hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation. J Am CollSurg 
215:379–387 
18 
OlwenyEO, Kapur P, Tan YK et al (2013) Irreversible electroporation: 
evaluation of nonthermal and thermal ablative capabilities in the porcine 
kidney. Urology 81:679–684 
19 
Maor E, Ivorra A, Leor J, Rubinsky B. Irreversible electroporation attenuates 
neointimal formation after angioplasty. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 
Sep;55(9):2268-74. 
20 
Thomson KR1, Cheung W, et al. Investigation of the safety of irreversible 
electroporation in humans. J VascIntervRadiol. 2011 May;22(5):611-21 
21 
Wittkampf FH1, van Driel VJ, et al. Feasibility of electroporation for the 
creation of pulmonary vein ostial lesions. J CardiovascElectrophysiol. 2011 
Mar;22(3):302-9. 
22 
Van DrielVJ, Neven KG, Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation: 
electroporation versus radiofrequency. CircArrhythmElectrophysiol. 2014; 
7(4):734-8. 
23 
Neven K, van Driel V, et al. Epicardial linear electroporation ablation and 
lesion size. Heart Rhythm. 2014; pii: S1547-5271(14)00459-7. 
24 
Verma A, Jiang C, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial 
fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(19):1812-22, 2015. 
25 
Messner A, Borchard R, et al. Impact of irrigated energy application on the 
right coronary artery hemodynamics: FFR measurement in patients who 
underwent ablation of common type atrial flutter. J Interv Card Electrophyol. 
(2008) 21:35-42. 
26 
Wong K, Lim C, et al. High incidence of acute sub-clinical circumflex artery 
“injury” following mitral isthmus ablation. European Heart Journal (2011) 32, 
1881-1890.