A Phase II Study of Concurrent Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Stereotactic Radiation in the Management of Patients With BRAF Mutation-Positive Malignant Melanoma and Brain Metastases
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Melanoma, Brain Metastases
Sponsor: Canadian Cancer Trials Group

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03 
 
AMENDMENT #1: 2018-APR-06 
 
 
AMENDMENT #2: 2018-OCT-26 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CANADIAN CANCER TRIALS GROUP (CCTG) 
 
A PHASE II STUDY OF CONCURRENT DABRAFENIB AND TRAMETINIB WITH 
STEREOTACTIC RADIATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH BRAF MUTATION–
POSITIVE MALIGNANT MELANOMA AND BRAIN METASTASES 
 
CCTG Protocol Number: IND.224 
 
 
 
STUDY CHAIRS: 
Arjun Sahgal 
 
 
Teresa Petrella 
 
 
TRIAL COMMITTEE: 
Young Lee Radiation Physics 
 
 
SENIOR INVESTIGATOR: 
Janet Dancey 
 
 
RADIATION THERAPY 
 
QUALITY ASSURANCE LEAD:  
Young Lee 
 
 
BIOSTATISTICIAN: 
Dongsheng Tu 
 
 
STUDY COORDINATOR: 
Linda Hagerman 
 
 
REGULATORY SPONSOR: 
CCTG  
 
 
SUPPORTED BY: 
Novartis 
 
(For contact information of study personnel see Final Page.) 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
i 
CONFIDENTIAL 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
STUDY ACKNOWLEDGMENT/DISCLOSURE .......................................................................................... 1 
 
TREATMENT SCHEMA ............................................................................................................................... 3 
 
1.0 
OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................... 6 
1.1 
Primary Objective ............................................................................................................................. 6 
1.2 
Secondary Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 6 
 
2.0 
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RATIONALE ................................................................... 7 
 
3.0 
BACKGROUND THERAPEUTIC INFORMATION ...................................................................... 11 
3.1 
Trametinib ...................................................................................................................................... 11 
3.2 
Dabrafenib ...................................................................................................................................... 15 
3.3 
Adverse Events of the Trametinib and Dabrafenib Combination ...................................................... 18 
3.4 
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) ...................................................................................................... 19 
 
4.0 
STUDY POPULATION .................................................................................................................. 20 
4.1 
Eligibility Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 20 
4.2 
Ineligibility Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 22 
 
5.0 
PATIENT EVALUATION FLOWSHEET: PRE-TREATMENT, ON STUDY, AND AFTER 
TREATMENT ................................................................................................................................ 25 
5.1 
Follow-up for Ineligible Patients ...................................................................................................... 26 
 
6.0 
ENTRY/Registration PROCEDURES ............................................................................................. 27 
6.1 
Entry Procedures ............................................................................................................................. 27 
6.2 
Registration ..................................................................................................................................... 27 
 
7.0 
TREATMENT PLAN ..................................................................................................................... 28 
7.1 
Chemotherapy Treatment Plan ......................................................................................................... 28 
7.2 
Concomitant Medications and Non-Drug Therapies ......................................................................... 31 
7.3 
Radiation Treatment Plan ................................................................................................................ 33 
7.4 
Duration of Protocol Treatment ....................................................................................................... 41 
 
8.0 
CRITERIA FOR MEASUREMENT OF STUDY ENDPOINTS ...................................................... 42 
8.1 
Definitions ...................................................................................................................................... 42 
8.2 
Response and Evaluation Endpoints................................................................................................. 42 
8.3 
Response Duration .......................................................................................................................... 47 
8.4 
Stable Disease Duration ................................................................................................................... 47 
8.5 
Methods of Measurement ................................................................................................................ 47 
 
9.0 
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING ................................................................................. 49 
9.1 
Definition of a Reportable Serious Adverse Event............................................................................ 49 
9.2 
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Instructions ................................................................................. 50 
9.3 
Other Protocol Reportable Events – Exposure Reporting, and Pregnancy Reporting ......................... 50 
9.4 
CCTG Responsibility for Reporting Serious Adverse Events to Health Canada ................................ 52 
9.5 
CCTG Reporting Responsibility to Novartis .................................................................................... 52 
9.6 
Novartis Reporting Responsibilities ................................................................................................. 52 
9.7 
Reporting Safety Reports to Investigators ........................................................................................ 52 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
ii 
CONFIDENTIAL 
10.0 
PROTOCOL TREATMENT DISCONTINUATION AND THERAPY AFTER STOPPING ........... 53 
10.1 
Criteria for Discontinuing Protocol Treatment ................................................................................. 53 
10.2 
Therapy After Protocol Treatment is Stopped .................................................................................. 53 
10.3 
Follow-up Off Protocol Treatment ................................................................................................... 53 
 
11.0 
CENTRAL REVIEW PROCEDURES AND TISSUE COLLECTION............................................. 54 
11.1 
Central Radiology Review ............................................................................................................... 54 
11.2 
Central Pathology Review ............................................................................................................... 54 
 
12.0 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................. 55 
12.1 
Objectives and Design ..................................................................................................................... 55 
12.2 
Primary Endpoints and Analysis ...................................................................................................... 55 
12.3 
Sample Size and Duration of Study .................................................................................................. 55 
12.4 
Safety Monitoring ........................................................................................................................... 55 
12.5 
Interim Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 55 
 
13.0 
PUBLICATION POLICY ............................................................................................................... 56 
13.1 
Authorship of Papers, Meeting Abstracts, Etc. ................................................................................. 56 
13.2 
Responsibility for Publication .......................................................................................................... 56 
13.3 
Submission of Material for Presentation or Publication .................................................................... 56 
 
14.0 
ETHICAL, REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES ................................................... 57 
14.1 
Regulatory Considerations ............................................................................................................... 57 
14.2 
Inclusivity in Research .................................................................................................................... 57 
14.3 
Obtaining Informed Consent ............................................................................................................ 57 
14.4 
Discontinuation of the Trial ............................................................................................................. 59 
14.5 
Retention of Patient Records and Study Files ................................................................................... 59 
14.6 
Centre Performance Monitoring ....................................................................................................... 59 
14.7 
On-Site Monitoring/Auditing ........................................................................................................... 59 
 
15.0 
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................ 60 
 
APPENDIX I -  PERFORMANCE STATUS SCALES/SCORES ............................................................... 62 
APPENDIX II -  DRUG DISTRIBUTION, SUPPLY AND CONTROL ...................................................... 63 
APPENDIX III - DOCUMENTATION FOR STUDY ................................................................................. 64 
APPENDIX IV -  NCI COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS ...................... 65 
APPENDIX V -  THE TNM CLASSIFICATION OF MALIGNANT TUMOURS ....................................... 66 
 
 
LIST OF CONTACTS ........................................................................................................................... Final Page 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
1 
CONFIDENTIAL 
STUDY ACKNOWLEDGMENT/DISCLOSURE 
 
I understand that this protocol contains information that is confidential and proprietary to Novartis. 
 
I have read the protocol and agree that it contains all necessary details for carrying out the study as 
described. I will conduct this protocol as outlined therein, and according to Good Clinical Practice and any 
applicable local regulations. I will make a reasonable effort to complete the study within the time 
designated. I confirm that I and study personnel participating under my supervision have adequate resource 
to fulfill their responsibilities as outlined in this protocol. I will maintain documentation of any investigator 
responsibilities assigned to participating study personnel. I confirm that all data will be submitted in a timely 
manner and will be accurate, complete and supported by source documents. I will complete any protocol 
specific training required by the sponsor and that I understand the requirement to inform additional site 
personnel with delegated duties of this information. 
 
I will provide copies of the protocol and access to all information furnished by CCTG and Novartis to study 
personnel under my supervision. I will discuss this material with them to ensure that they are fully informed 
about the investigational product and the study. 
 
I understand that this trial will be registered on a public trial registry and that my contact information and 
site name will be included in the registry listing. 
 
I will provide protocol information to my Research Ethics Board (REB), Institutional Review Board(s) 
[IRB(s)] or Independent Ethics Committee(s) [IEC(s)], subject to the following condition: The contents of 
this protocol may not be used in any other clinical trial and may not be disclosed to any other person or 
entity without the prior written permission of Novartis and CCTG. The foregoing shall not apply to 
disclosure required by governmental regulations or laws; however, I will give prompt notice to Novartis 
and CCTG of any such disclosure. 
 
I understand and acknowledge the following: 
i. 
According to the Participating Centre Agreement between this Participating Centre and CCTG, for 
trials that involve the use of Study Drug provided by a third party support provider, CCTG 
endeavours to contractually bind the provider to indemnify each Participating Centre who activates 
on the trial; 
ii. 
For this study, the support provider would not agree to indemnify the Participating Centres. 
However, the company does represent and warrant that all Study Drug(s) provided will be in 
compliance with all applicable requirements and specifications of the Therapeutic Products 
Directorate of Health Canada; 
iii. 
Furthermore, both study drugs are approved by Health Canada, are commercially available, and are 
being used within their indication in this study; that is, for patients with advanced BRAF mutation-
positive melanoma. The addition of the radiation therapy for their brain metastases is the 
investigational part of the study. This is an academic trial which was developed by the CCTG 
Melanoma Disease-Site Committee. 
 
I will provide the above information about the indemnification to the relevant personnel at my Participating 
Centre.  
 
I understand that I may terminate or suspend enrolment of the study at any time if it becomes necessary to 
protect the best interests of the study subjects, however I will give prompt notice to CCTG. The study may 
be terminated at any time by CCTG or Novartis with or without cause. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
2 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Any supplemental information that may be added to this document is also confidential and proprietary to 
Novartis and CCTG and must be kept in confidence in the same manner as the contents of this protocol. 
 
 
___________________________________________________ 
_________________________ 
Qualified Investigator 
Date 
(printed name and signature) 
 
Protocol Number: CCTG IND.224 
 
CENTRE: ___________________________________________ 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03; AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06; AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
TREATMENT SCHEMA 
 
Eligibility 
• 
Histologically confirmed melanoma metastatic to brain and determined to be BRAF V600 mutated. 
• 
Patients who have received prior systemic anti-cancer treatment (including single agent PD1 or 
combination immunotherapy) are eligible. 
• 
Patients must have recovered from prior treatment related toxicity related to prior systemic therapy with 
a window of 4 weeks since previous treatment. 
• 
Prior systemic treatment in the adjuvant setting is allowed. 
• 
Patients may have received prior whole brain radiation with progressive and/or new brain metastases 
to be treated with radiosurgery such that up to 10 metastases will be treated according to protocol. In 
total (previously treated in addition to study eligible metastases), there can be no more than 10 
metastases in the brain.  
• 
Patients who have had prior surgery and whole brain radiation or cavity radiosurgery for brain 
metastases are eligible if they are planned for radiosurgery to up to 10 intact metastases and treated per 
study protocol. 
• 
A minimum of 2 weeks from prior surgery is required before the study protocol can be delivered to 
eligible metastases. 
• 
In total (previously treated in addition to study eligible metastases), there can be no more than 10 
metastases in the brain. 
• 
Age ≥ 18 years. 
• 
Karnofsky Performance Status of 70-100 (Appendix I). 
• 
Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. 
• 
Presence of measurable disease (i.e. present with at least one measurable CNS lesion per RECIST 1.1). 
• 
Presence of 1-10 brain metastases as confirmed on a thin slice axial T1 post-gadolinium MRI sequence. 
The maximum diameter of a single brain lesion should be ≤ 4 cm, and presence of a measurable lesion 
> 1 cm based on baseline MRI of brain. 
• 
All CNS metastases amenable to single fraction SRS and or fractionated SRS. Hemorrhagic lesions are 
allowed if the treating radiation oncologist deems the lesion amenable to focal SRS. 
• 
Able to swallow and retain oral medication and must not have any clinically significant gastrointestinal 
abnormalities that may alter absorption such as malabsorption syndrome or major resection of the 
stomach or bowels. 
 
Laboratory requirements (within 14 days prior to registration): 
- 
ANC  
≥ 1.2 x 109/L 
- 
Hemoglobin 
≥ 90 g/L  
- 
Platelet count 
≥ 100 x 109/L 
- 
PT/INR & PTT  
≤ 1.3 x ULN 
- 
Total bilirubin 
≤ 1.5 x ULN 
- 
AST and ALT 
≤ 2.5 x ULN  
- 
Serum creatinine or 
≤ 1.5 x ULN or 
Creatinine Clearance 
≥ 50 ml/min (calculated by Cockcroft and Gault) 
 
- 
LVEF 
≥ LLN (within 28 days prior to registration) 
• 
No prior treatment with a BRAF inhibitor or a MEK inhibitor. 
• 
No known ocular or primary mucosal melanoma. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
4 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03; AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06; AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
• 
No current use of a prohibited medication as described in Section 7.2. 
• 
No history of malignancy with confirmed activating RAS mutation at any time. 
• 
No history of malignancy other than disease under study within 3 years, of study enrolment, (see 4.2.6 
for exceptions). 
• 
No leptomeningeal metastases or metastases causing spinal cord compression that are symptomatic or 
untreated or not stable for ≥ 3 months (must be documented by imaging). Subjects on a stable dose of 
corticosteroids > 2 weeks or who have been off of corticosteroids for at least 2 weeks can be enrolled 
with approval of the CCTG. 
• 
No serious or unstable pre-existing medical conditions (aside from malignancy exceptions specified 
above), psychiatric disorders, or other conditions that could interfere with the subject’s safety, obtaining 
informed consent, or compliance with study procedures. 
• 
No history of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection (subjects with laboratory 
evidence of cleared HBV and/or HCV will be permitted). 
• 
No history or evidence of cardiovascular risk (see 4.2.10 for details). 
• 
No history or current evidence/risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or central serous retinopathy (CSR) 
(see 4.2.11 for complete details). 
• 
No known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related 
to the study treatments, their excipients, and/or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). 
• 
No pregnant or lactating women. 
• 
No history of interstitial lung disease or active pneumonitis. 
• 
Presence of any one brain metastases > 4 cm in maximal diameter, and/or presence of brain metastases 
of less than 1 cm. 
• 
No brainstem metastases. 
• 
No contraindications to MRI and/or Gadolinium contrast or stereotactic brain radiation therapy. 
 
Pre-Treatment Evaluations 
• 
History, physical exam (including vital signs - blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, height and 
weight, Karnofsky Performance Status (Appendix I)), hematology, biochemistry, coagulation, adverse 
events/baseline symptoms, pregnancy test (if applicable), clinical tumour measurements (if applicable), 
within 14 days prior to registration. 
• 
Radiology: CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis (contrast enhanced); MRI brain; other scans as necessary, within 
28 days of registration (within 35 days if negative). 
• 
ECHO/MUGA (within 28 days prior to registration). 
 
On-Treatment Evaluations 
• 
Physical Exam: weight, Karnofsky Performance Status (Appendix I), clinical tumour measurements (if 
applicable): day 1 each cycle. 
• 
Vital signs: blood pressure, heart rate, temperature: day 1 each cycle. 
• 
Hematology & Biochemistry: day 1 each cycle. 
• 
PT/INR and PTT: as clinically indicated. 
• 
Radiology (MRI brain and CT chest, abdomen and pelvis): every 8 weeks. 
• 
EKG, ECHO/MUGA, ophthalmology and dermatology exam: as clinically indicated. 
• 
Adverse events: end of each cycle. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
5 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Duration of Protocol Treatment 
Patients may stop protocol treatment in the following instances: 
• 
Intercurrent illness which would, in the judgement of the investigator, affect assessments of clinical 
status to a significant degree, and require discontinuation of protocol therapy. 
• 
Unacceptable toxicity as defined in Section 7.0. 
• 
Tumour progression or disease recurrence as defined in Section 8.0. 
• 
Request by the patient. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
6 
CONFIDENTIAL 
1.0 
OBJECTIVES 
 
1.1 
Primary Objective 
 
• 
To determine the intracranial objective response rate to concurrent dabrafenib and trametinib 
with stereotactic radiation in patients with BRAF mutation-positive malignant melanoma and 
brain metastases. 
 
1.2 
Secondary Objectives 
• 
Extra-cranial objective response rate and overall ORR. 
• 
Duration of response. 
• 
Intracranial and overall progression free survival. 
• 
Overall Survival. 
• 
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the regimen using the CTCAE v.4. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
7 
CONFIDENTIAL 
2.0 
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RATIONALE 
 
Brain metastases are common in patients with malignant melanoma. Melanoma is the third most 
common cancer causing brain metastases, after cancers of the lung and breast [Johnson 1996]. Brain 
metastases are responsible for 20 to 54 percent of deaths in patients with melanoma [Skibber 1996], 
and among those with documented brain metastases, these lesions contribute to death in up to 95 
percent of cases [Sampson 1998]. The frequency of clinically significant brain metastases in patients 
with melanoma will likely increase as systemic therapy improves control of extra-cranial disease 
and patient survival improves. The primary approaches to the treatment of brain metastases include 
whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). WBRT is 
only marginally effective for radio-resistant tumours such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. 
SRS is as effective for these tumors as it is for radiosensitive tumours such as breast and lung [Yaeh 
2015]. SRS is thus preferred for melanoma patients with brain metastases if it can be administered. 
 
The goal of managing patients with metastatic melanoma is to control both cranial and extracranial 
disease maximally. Traditionally, once brain metastases are diagnosed then systemic therapy is 
either held, or delayed, to complete radiation. Delays and interruptions in systemic therapy are sub-
optimal as the aim is to control the overall disease burden. Thus, new agents such as dabrafenib 
and trametinib that show potential to penetrate the blood-brain-barrier, and have an effect on brain 
metastases as well as extracranial disease, are attractive. Administration of drugs concurrent and 
following brain SRS may also be preferred in patients with brain metastases, to maximize inhibition 
of the MAPK pathway and induce tumour cell death. Clinically, the rationale to treat with brain 
SRS is to control gross disease in the brain at the outset, which is clinically preferable, while the 
drugs control sub-clinical disease not visible on MRI and enhance the effect of SRS on the treated 
lesions. 
 
Activity of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Melanoma 
 
Dabrafenib, a selective BRAF inhibitor, has shown activity with a manageable safety profile in 
phase I/II studies in patients with BRAF V600E metastatic melanoma. Recently, the results of the 
BREAK-3 trial were reported [Hauschild 2012]. This was a phase III, randomized open-label trial 
comparing dabrafenib to dacarbazine in patients with BRAF V600E melanoma. Dabrafenib 
significantly improved progression-free-survival and objective response rates over dacarbazine. 
Trametinib is a reversible, selective allosteric inhibitor of both MEK1 and MEK2. The phase III 
trial randomized patients with BRAF mutation positive advanced melanoma to trametinib or 
chemotherapy. Trametinib was associated with a significant improvement of progression-free-
survival and overall survival. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Recent data of two phase III combination trials involving dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic 
melanoma patients have shown an improvement in RR, PFS and OS. In the phase III COMBI-d 
trial, 423 patients with advanced melanoma with V600E or V600K mutation were randomly 
assigned to either dabrafenib (150 mg twice per day) plus trametinib (2 mg once per day) or to 
dabrafenib plus placebo [Long 2014; Long 2015]. Progression-free survival, the primary endpoint of 
the trial, was significantly prolonged with the combination compared with dabrafenib alone 
(median 11.0 versus 8.8 months, hazard ration [HR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.84). Overall survival was 
improved with the combination (median 25.1 versus 18.7 months, HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92). 
The objective response rate (complete plus partial) was significantly improved (69 versus 53 
percent) with the combination compared with dabrafenib alone; the complete response rates were 
16 versus 13 percent, respectively. In the other phase III trial, 704 patients with previously untreated 
metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to either dabrafenib plus trametinib or vemurafenib 
[Robert 2015]. All patients had melanoma containing a BRAF V600 mutation. The trial was stopped 
for efficacy based upon positive results after a planned interim analysis. Overall survival, the 
primary endpoint of the trial, was significantly increased with the dabrafenib plus trametinib 
combination (one-year survival rate 72 versus 65 percent, HR for death 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89). 
Median progression-free survival was also significantly increased (11.4 versus 7.3 months, 95% CI 
0.46-0.69) as was the objective response rate (64 versus 51 percent). 
 
Combination therapy was well tolerated. Cutaneous toxicities were significantly more common in 
patients treated with dabrafenib plus placebo compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib. Squamous 
cell carcinoma was observed in 9 percent with dabrafenib plus placebo versus 3 percent with the 
combination. Toxicities more frequently associated with the combination included diarrhea (18 
versus 9 percent), pyrexia (52 versus 25 percent), and chills (28 versus 14 percent). 
 
Chorioretinopathy was rare, seen in less than 1% of patients and a decrease in LVEF was seen in 
4% of patients in the COMBI-D trial [Long 2014]. Combination therapy with a BRAF plus MEK 
inhibitor will soon be a standard of care for metastatic melanoma that harbours a BRAF mutation. 
 
Dabrafenib alone was also tested in a phase II cohort study in patients with brain metastases and 
showed an OIRR of 31 to 39% with a median duration of IORR of 20.1 and 28.1 weeks in those 
with previously treated brain metastases [Long 2012]. This median duration is not significantly 
different than what is observed historically with SRS or WBRT alone and hence a combined 
approach may be needed to improve duration of response. 
 
Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases 
 
In the past, all patients with brain metastases were treated with WBRT. Although WBRT is 
effective in reducing the risk of new brain metastases, typically from 50% if omitted to 30% if 
delivered [Slotman 2007;Chang 2009; Sun 2011; Sahgal 2015], local progression rates following WBRT 
are sub-optimal. A recent study, in the era of MRI screening and follow-up, reported a median PFS 
of 5.9 months and a crude risk of progression of 60% following WBRT. Beyond the poor long-
term local control rates, WBRT is associated with significant side effects which can include a 
reduction in appetite, increased fatigue, and reductions in quality of life and neurocognitive 
assessment [Slotman 2007;Chang 2009; Sun 2011]. Moreover, these side effects can result in delays and 
hamper tolerability to further systemic therapy. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
9 
CONFIDENTIAL 
With the emergence of focal radiation in the form of SRS [Sahgal 2009], patients now have an 
alternative to WBRT with a better side effect profile and efficacy with respect to local control. We 
typically observe 1 year local control rates of ~70%. The drawback to SRS alone lies in distant 
brain control, as the risk of new distant brain metastases is typically ~50% which is reduced to 
~30% with adjuvant WBRT. This implies that patients require close follow-up, and treatment with 
salvage radiation (further SRS or WBRT) more often with SRS alone. There have now been three 
randomized trials comparing SRS alone to SRS plus adjuvant WBRT [Gondi 2014]. Patients with 
good performance status (KPS at least 70) and up to 4 tumours were included. The results show no 
difference in overall survival when WBRT is omitted. More recently, an individual patient data 
meta-analysis reports a survival advantage with SRS alone in younger patients [Sahgal 2015]. These 
survival results in general, from the individual trials and meta-analyses, show no advantage to 
WBRT. However, gains in local control and distant brain control are consistently observed with 
adjuvant WBRT. It is hypothesized that the toxicities of WBRT may negate the beneficial impact 
with respect to these endpoints and explains the survival outcomes [Sun 2011; Tsao 2012; Aoyama 2006; 
Sahgal 2015]. 
 
Based on the current evidence, SRS alone is considered a standard of care treatment option for 
patients at least with up to 4 lesions [Sahgal 2015]. It is increasingly being recognized and advocated 
for by professional societies (for example, the NCCN), that the number of lesions is not as important 
as compared to the suitability of SRS treatment as the sole treatment modality. In fact, the American 
Society of Radiation Oncology now recommends, in their Choosing Wisely campaign, withholding 
adjuvant WBRT if a patient is treated with SRS alone. The evidence is emerging to support SRS 
alone for patients with multiple metastases, and the highest level of evidence comes from Japan. 
Yamamoto et al. reported a Phase 2 study of SRS alone for patients with up to 10 lesions [Yamamoto 
2014]. The data suggest that patients with 5 to 10 tumours fare similarly with respect to survival, 
local control and distant brain control as compared to those with 2 to 4. Therefore, for patients with 
up to 10 lesions, the use of SRS alone is reasonable and now evidence-based. As a result of the 
most current evidence and standards of care, our study proposes to treat with SRS alone and include 
two cohorts consisting of 1) patients with 1-4 metastases to be treated with SRS concurrent with 
dabrafenib with trametinib, and 2) patients with 5-10 metastases to be treated with SRS concurrent 
with dabrafenib with trametinib. WBRT will be withheld and may be used as a salvage therapy as 
needed [http://www.choosingwisely.org/astro-releases-second-list/]. 
 
Traditionally, SRS has been limited by tumour size/volume. Dose reductions are required for larger 
tumours to minimize the risk of radiation necrosis (typically ~5-10%), and the resulting control 
rates worse for tumours greater than 2-3 cm. The recommended maximal tumour linear dimension 
for SRS has been 4 cm for these reasons. However, with modern SRS technology there are now 
alternative focal radiation strategies to treat large lesions in the form of fractionated SRS. The 
practice of 2 to 5 fraction SRS allows larger tumours to be treated effectively and the limited data 
suggest superior efficacy for larger metastases [Feuvret 2014; Kim 2011]. As a result of the practice 
shift, we will allow fractionated SRS as directed by the treating radiation oncologist. With respect 
to salvage therapy, if limited progression is observed such that further SRS can be delivered then 
this will be recommended; however, if the pattern of relapse is such that SRS is not indicated then 
salvage WBRT will be allowed. 
 
We expect, for patients with BRAF mutation–positive malignant melanoma and metastases to the 
brain, we will observe a longer time to progression intracranially, higher objective response rate 
and a longer duration of response with respect to overall brain control with our strategy of SRS 
plus dabrafenib and trametinib. Ultimately, this strategy will translate to an increase in overall 
survival. We propose a phase 2 study of concurrent SRS plus dabrafenib with trametinib followed 
by continued drug therapy in two cohorts (patients with 1-4 metastases and 5-10 metastases). 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
10 
CONFIDENTIAL 
BRAF inhibitor therapy can have a radiosensitizing effect on cancerous and healthy tissue [Zahnreich 
2016]. Radiation skin injury has been reported with concurrent use of BRAF inhibitors such as 
vemurafenib and dabrafenib and radiation including whole brain radiation for brain metastases. 
However, SRS limits dose to skin by using multiple beams from various angles, and only in a few 
fractions, we believe that this will not be a limiting toxicity. A recent study by Hecht et al. reported 
safety with SRS concurrent with a BRAF inhibitor such that no increase in skin toxicity or severe 
adverse events was observed [Hecht 2015]. No similar data exists for concurrent dabrafenib with 
trametinib. A recent report from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) acknowledged 
the lack of data with respect to SRS and concurrent BRAF inhibitors, and did not conclude any 
additional risk of radiation necrosis and hemorrhage from brain metastases when treated with a 
BRAF inhibitor and radiation. They suggested, based on limited literature and practice patterns, 
that the BRAF inhibitor be withheld 1 day prior to and after SRS, and 3 days prior to and after 
fractionated radiation; however, acknowledged that concurrent use should be evaluated on trial 
[Anker 2016]. Therefore, we will have an interim safety assessment after 5 patients in each cohort. If 
radiation dermatitis occurs, the study treatment will be modified so that dabrafenib and trametinib 
will be started two days after SRS is completed. These recommendations can be modified based on 
the physician’s assessment of the risk of radiation skin injury. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
11 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3.0 
BACKGROUND THERAPEUTIC INFORMATION 
 
3.1 
Trametinib 
 
3.1.1 
Name and Chemical Information trametinib, SYNONYM(S)m: MEKINIST, GSK1120212 
 
COMMON TRADE NAME(S): Mekinist® 
Common name: trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide  
Chemical name: equimolecular combination of N-(3-{3-cyclopropyl-5-[(2- fluoro-4-
iodophenyl)amino]-6,8-dimethyl-2,4,7-trioxo- 3,4,6,7-tetrahydropyrido[4,3-d]pyrimidin-1(2H)- 
yl}phenyl)acetamide with (methylsulfinyl)methane  
Molecular formula: C26H23FIN5O4.C2H6OS  
Molecular mass: 693.53 (DMSO solvate of parent) 615.39 (non-solvated parent) 
 
3.1.2 
Chemical Structure 
 
 
3.1.3 
Mechanism of Action 
 
Trametinib is small molecule inhibitor of mitogen-activated extracellular signal regulated kinase 1 
and 2 (MEK1 and MEK2). MEK1 and MEK2 are components of the mitogen-activated protein 
kinase (MAPK) pathway. The RAS effector pathway RAF-MEK-ERK, is an essential, shared 
element of mitogenic signaling involving tyrosine kinase receptors, leading to a wide range of 
cellular responses, including growth, differentiation, inflammation, and apoptosis. Mutant BRAF 
and RAS proteins subsequently signal through MEK1 and MEK2 leading to consecutive activation 
of the MAPK pathway and stimulation of cell growth. BRAF mutations have been identified at a 
high frequency in specific cancers, including approximately 50% of melanoma. 
 
3.1.4 
Experimental Antitumour Activity 
 
Trametinib is a reversible, and selective allosteric inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2 activation and 
kinase activity. The IC50 values for the unphosphorylated form of MEK1 and MEK2 are 0.7 nM 
and 0.9 nM, respectively. The IC50 values for the phosphorylated form of MEK1 and MEK2 are 
13.2 nM and 10.7 nM, respectively. Trametinib inhibits growth of BRAF V600 mutant melanoma 
cell lines and demonstrates anti-tumour effects in BRAF V600 mutant melanoma xenograft models. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
12 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3.1.5 
Animal Toxicology 
 
The nonclinical toxicology findings associated with trametinib administration to mice, rats and 
dogs are consistent with pharmacologically mediated changes as a result of MEK1/MEK2 
inhibition and disruption of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. 
Trametinib caused adverse effects in a variety of tissues and systems (skin, gastrointestinal tract, 
phosphate homeostasis, liver, ovary, bone and hematological tissues) mainly at doses ≥ 0.03 
mg/kg/day. The majority of findings in mice and dogs appeared to be related to effects within the 
gastrointestinal tract, where in mice, effects were observed at or above clinical exposures and 
primarily consisted of perforation of the colon with secondary peritonitis and degeneration/necrosis 
of the glandular mucosa of the stomach, and in dogs presented clinically as decreased bodyweight, 
decreased food consumption and/or fecal abnormalities and occurred at subclinical exposures. In 
conclusion, the toxic potential of trametinib has been characterized in a comprehensive battery of 
nonclinical studies. The effects observed in nonclinical studies were generally, either directly or 
indirectly, associated with the pharmacologic inhibition of MEK1/MEK2 by trametinib and 
generally consistent with adverse effects observed in cancer patients. 
 
Carcinogenicity:  
Unknown. Studies have not been conducted. 
Pregnancy and Lactation: 
Genotoxicity: No 
Embryotoxicity: Yes 
Fetotoxicity: Yes 
Trametinib is not recommended for use in pregnancy. Adequate 
contraception should be used by both sexes during treatment, and for 
4 months after the last dose. 
Abortifacient effects:  
Yes 
Excretion into breast milk:  Do not breastfeed when taking trametinib. 
Fertility effects:  
Probable 
 
3.1.6 
Phase III Trials 
 
The efficacy and safety of trametinib monotherapy were evaluated in a phase III randomized, multi-
centre, international, open label study comparing trametinib to chemotherapy in patients with 
unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E or V600K mutation-positive cutaneous melanoma. The 
efficacy and safety of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib in the treatment of patients with 
BRAF V600 mutation positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma has been evaluated in one 
phase III multi-centre, international clinical study MEK115306. MEK115306 is a phase III double 
blind, randomized study of 423 patients with BRAF V600E or BRAF V600K mutation. 
 
Screening for both studies included central laboratory testing of BRAF mutation (V600E or 
V600K) using a BRAF mutation assay conducted on the most recent tumour sample available from 
either a primary tumour or a tumour from a metastatic site. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
13 
CONFIDENTIAL 
In the primary efficacy population, trametinib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement 
in investigator-assessed PFS (HR = 0.44; [95% CI: 0.31, 0.64], N=273, P<0.0001) which represents 
a 56% reduction in the risk of tumour progression or death for patients treated with trametinib 
compared with those treated with chemotherapy. Comparable PFS results were observed in the ITT 
population (HR = 0.45; [95% CI: 0.33, 0.63], N=322, P<0.0001). Similar PFS results were seen 
based on an Independent Review Committee evaluation. At the time of the primary analysis, the 
median follow-up were 4.9 months for patients treated with trametinib and 4.8 months for those 
treated with chemotherapy. 
 
At the time of primary analysis, OS data were not mature with 20% events reported in the ITT 
population and 51 (47%) patients in the chemotherapy arm had crossed over to receive trametinib 
after a confirmed disease progression. An updated analysis was conducted with 63% events. 
 
The investigator-assessed best confirmed overall response rate (ORR) was 22% in the trametinib 
arm compared to 8% in the chemotherapy arm. However, in the trametinib treatment arm, the 
confirmed overall response rate was 10% in patients with BRAF V600K mutation compared to 
24% in those with BRAF V600E mutation. 
 
Treatment effect with trametinib was observed across all subgroups. However, in patients with 
BRAF V600K mutation, the investigator-assessed best confirmed overall response rate was 10% 
in the trametinib arm (n=29) compared to 18% in the chemotherapy arm (n=11). 
 
3.1.7 
Pharmacokinetic Studies 
 
Trametinib pharmacokinetics were determined after single- and repeat-dose oral administration of 
trametinib tablets in subjects with solid tumors. Trametinib is absorbed rapidly with median time 
to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) generally occurring 1.50 hours after single oral 
administration of trametinib under fasting conditions. The absolute oral bioavailability of a single 
trametinib 2.0 mg tablet is moderate to high (72%) relative to a co-administered intravenous (IV) 
microdose. Single-dose administration of trametinib with a high-fat, high-calorie meal resulted in 
a 70% decrease in Cmax, a 24% decrease in area under the concentration-time curve from time 
zero (predose) to last time point (AUC[0-t]) and a 10% decrease in AUC extrapolated to infinity 
(AUC[0-∞]) compared to fasted conditions. 
 
Following repeat-dosing the mean area under the curve from 0 hours to the time of next dosing 
(AUC[0-τ]) and Cmax increased in an approximately dose proportional manner. Trametinib 
accumulates with repeat dosing with a mean accumulation ratio at the recommended dose of 2 mg 
once daily of 5.97 and a terminal half-life of 5.3 days determined after single dose administration. 
Steady state appears to be achieved by Day 15, with little difference in pre-dose (trough) 
concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ), Cmax and area under the concentration-time 
curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hrs (AUC[0-24]) between Days 15 and 21. 
 
Trametinib is a low extraction ratio drug based on plasma IV clearance of 3.21 L/hr, which 
represents approximately 1% of liver blood flow. Trametinib has a high volume of distribution (Vd) 
of 1060 L determined following an IV microdose. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
14 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Following a single dose of [14C]-trametinib, approximately 50% of circulating radioactivity is 
represented as the parent compound. The fecal route was the major excretion pathway of 
radioactivity after a single [14C]trametinib oral dose, accounting for >80% of excreted radioactivity 
recovered up to 10 days post-dose (or 39.2% and 35.0% of the radioactive dose in 2 subjects) while 
urinary excretion accounted for up to 19% of excreted radioactivity recovered (up to 9% of the 
radioactive dose). In vitro and in vivo data suggest that trametinib is unlikely to affect the PK of 
other drugs and that the PK of trametinib is unlikely to be affected by other drugs. Trametinib is 
eliminated predominantly via deacetylation which is mediated by CES1b, CES1c, CES2 and 
possibly other hydrolases. There is little evidence from clinical studies for drug 
interactions mediated by carboxylesterases. 
 
3.1.8 
Pharmaceutical Data 
 
Supplied: Trametinib 0.5 mg tablets are yellow, modified oval, biconvex, film-coated tablets with 
‘GS’ debossed on one face and ‘TFC’ on the opposing face. Available in bottles of 30 tablets. 
Bottles contain a silica gel desiccant. 
 
Trametinib 2.0 mg tablets are pink, round, biconvex, film-coated tablets with ‘GS’ debossed on 
one face and ‘HMJ’ on the opposing face. Available in bottles of 30 tablets. Bottles contain a silica 
gel desiccant. 
 
Trametinib tablets contain 0.5, 1.0*, or 2.0 mg of trametinib and the following nonmedicinal 
ingredients: croscarmellose sodium, hypromellose, magnesium stearate, mannitol, microcrystalline 
cellulose, silicon dioxide (colloidal), and sodium lauryl sulphate. The tablet coating contains: 
hypromellose polyethylene glycol, and titanium dioxide. In addition, the 0.5 mg tablets contain iron 
oxide yellow and the 2.0 mg tablets contain iron oxide red and polysorbate 80. 
 
* 
Trametinib 1 mg tablets not available in Canada. 
 
Stability: Refer to current IB. 
 
Storage: Store refrigerated, 2-8°C. Protect from light and moisture. Do not remove desiccant. 
Dispense in original bottle. 
 
Route of Administration: Oral. The recommended dose of trametinib is 2 mg given orally once 
daily with a full glass of water. Trametinib should be taken without food, at least one hour before 
or two hours after a meal. 
 
Missed Dose: If a dose is missed, trametinib should not be taken if it is less than 12 hours until the 
next dose. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
15 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3.2 
Dabrafenib 
 
3.2.1 
Name and Chemical Information 
 
COMMON TRADE NAME(S): PrTAFINLAR® 
 
Common name: Dabrafenib mesylate  
Chemical name: N-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)- 1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-
2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzene sulfonamide, methanesulfonate salt  
Molecular formula: C23H20F3N5O2S2. CH4O3S  
Molecular mass: 519.57 g/mol (dabrafenib free base)  
615.6 g/mol (dabrafenib mesylate) 
 
3.2.2 
Chemical Structure 
 
3.2.3 
Mechanism of Action 
 
Dabrafenib is an orally bioavailable, small molecule inhibitor of RAF kinases, including BRAF. 
Oncogenic mutations in BRAF lead to constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein 
kinase (MAPK) pathway (including RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK) and may promote tumour cell growth. 
BRAF mutations have been identified at a high frequency in specific cancers, including 
approximately 50 % of melanomas. The most commonly observed BRAF mutation, V600E, and 
the next most common, V600K, account for approximately 95 % of BRAF mutations found in 
patients with melanoma. A number of less common substitutions include V600D, V600G and 
V600R. 
 
3.2.4 
Experimental Antitumour Activity 
 
Dabrafenib is a potent, selective, ATP-competitive inhibitor of RAF kinases requiring low 
concentrations to inhibit 50% of enzyme activity (IC50) in in vitro kinase. The inhibitory activity 
of dabrafenib has not been determined for BRAF variants V600R, V600G and V600M. The results 
from the in vitro kinase assays were consistent with the inhibition of proliferation of melanoma cell 
lines. Melanoma cell lines harbouring V600E, V600K or V600D mutations were sensitive to cell 
growth inhibition by dabrafenib (IC50 < 1 M) compared to melanoma cell lines expressing wild-
type BRAF. Dabrafenib demonstrated suppression of phosphorylated ERK (pERK) in tumour cell 
lines and achieved biomarker suppression and tumour regression in BRAF V600E human 
melanoma mouse xenografts. Suppression of pERK and tumour regression in BRAF V600K human 
melanoma mouse xenografts by dabrafenib has not been evaluated. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
16 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3.2.5 
Animal Toxicology 
 
Dabrafenib inhibited hERG repolarization with an estimated IC25 of 11.7 μM (6.1 μg/mL); 
however, its 3 active metabolites did not inhibit hERG (IC50 > 30 μM). In an ex-vivo rabbit left 
ventricular wedge assay, dabrafenib caused QT interval shortening (29.7% at 30 μM) with no 
significant changes in QRS interval and no torsadogenic potential. In rats, a single oral dose of 
dabrafenib of ≥ 5 mg/kg caused a dose-dependent, mild to moderate increase in heart rate (9 to 48 
beats/minute or up to 18%). In dogs, a single oral dose of 50 mg/kg dabrafenib produced a mild 
increase in heart rate (28%) along with a mild decrease in PR interval (7%) that reversed by 
24 hours post dose. 
 
Adverse cardiovascular effects, including coronary arterial degeneration/necrosis and/or 
hemorrhage, cardiac atrioventricular valve hypertrophy/hemorrhage and atrial fibrovascular 
proliferation were seen in dogs (≥ 2 times human clinical exposure based on AUC). Focal 
arterial/perivascular inflammation in various tissues was observed in mice and an increased 
incidence of hepatic arterial degeneration and spontaneous cardiomyocyte degeneration with 
inflammation (spontaneous cardiomyopathy) was observed in rats (≥ 0.5 and 0.6 times human 
clinical exposure for rats and mice respectively). Hepatic effects, including hepatocellular necrosis 
and inflammation were observed in mice (≥ 0.6 times clinical exposure). Bronchoalveolar 
inflammation of the lungs was observed in several dogs at ≥ 20 mg/kg/day (≥ 9 times human 
clinical exposure based on AUC) and was associated with shallow and/or laboured breathing. 
 
Reversible hematological effects have been observed in dogs and rats given dabrafenib. In studies 
of up to 13 weeks, decreases in reticulocyte counts and/or red cell mass were observed in dogs and 
rats (≥ 10 and 1.4 times clinical exposure, respectively). 
 
Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity  
 
Dabrafenib is embryofetal toxic and teratogenic in animals at doses similar to human clinical 
exposures. In combined female fertility, early embryonic and embryofetal development studies in 
rats, a reduction in fertility was observed at 300 mg/kg/day (approximately 3 times human clinical 
exposure based on AUC). There was also delayed skeletal development and reduced fetal body 
weight at doses ≥ 20 mg/kg/day (≥ 0.5 times human clinical exposure based on AUC). The numbers 
of ovarian corpora lutea were reduced in pregnant females at 300 mg/kg/day. Developmental 
toxicity including embryo-lethality and ventricular septal defects were also seen at 300 mg/kg/day. 
 
Male fertility studies with dabrafenib have not been conducted. However, in repeat dose studies, 
testicular degeneration/depletion was seen in rats and dogs (≥ 0.2 times the human clinical exposure 
based on AUC). Testicular changes in rat and dog were still present following a 4-week recovery 
period. 
 
Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis  
 
Carcinogenicity studies with dabrafenib have not been conducted. Dabrafenib was not mutagenic 
or clastogenic using in vitro tests in bacteria and cultured mammalian cells, and an in vivo rodent 
micronucleus assay. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
17 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3.2.6 
Phase III Trials  
 
The efficacy and safety of dabrafenib mesylate monotherapy in the treatment of patients with 
BRAF V600 mutation positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma has been evaluated in three 
multi-centre, international clinical studies. The efficacy and safety of dabrafenib in combination 
with trametinib in the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive unresectable or 
metastatic melanoma has been evaluated in one phase III multi-centre, international clinical study 
MEK115306. MEK115306 is a phase III double blind, randomized study of 423 patients with 
BRAF V600E or BRAF V600K mutation. 
 
Screening for eligibility required central testing for BRAF V600 mutation using a BRAF mutation 
assay conducted on the most recent tumour sample available from either a primary tumour or a 
tumour from a metastatic site. The assay used in clinical studies differentiates between V600E and 
V600K mutations. 
 
The efficacy and safety of dabrafenib in previously treated patients with BRAF V600E mutation 
positive advanced (Stage III unresectable) or metastatic (Stage IV) cutaneous melanoma were 
evaluated in study BRF113683 comparing dabrafenib to dacarbazine (DTIC). 
 
Patients were permitted to have prior IL-2 treatment, surgery and radiotherapy. The primary 
objective was to evaluate the efficacy of dabrafenib compared to DTIC with respect to progression-
free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment. Secondary efficacy endpoints included comparison 
of overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response and health-related 
quality of life (HRQoL) status. 
 
Patients were randomized (3:1) to receive either dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily or intravenous 
DTIC 1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage. Patients 
on the DTIC arm were permitted to cross over to dabrafenib after initial progression. 
 
Treatment with dabrafenib monotherapy was associated with a statistically significant 
improvement on the primary endpoint, investigator-assessed PFS, compared to treatment with 
DTIC (HR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.51; p<0.0001). This represents a relative reduction of 70% in the 
risk of disease progression or death compared with DTIC. Across subgroups, a consistent PFS 
benefit of the same magnitude as the overall study population was seen. Independent reviewer-
assessed PFS results were consistent with investigator-assessed results. 
 
The secondary endpoint of investigator assessed best confirmed ORR favoured dabrafenib over 
DTIC. Overall survival data were not mature at the time of the study’s primary analysis. 
 
3.2.7 
Pharmacokinetic Studies 
 
The pharmacoketics of dabrafenib were determined in patients with BRAF mutation-positive 
metastatic melanoma after single dose and after repeat dosing at 150 mg twice daily with dosing 
approximately 12 hours apart. 
 
Absorption: Dabrafenib is absorbed orally with a mean absolute bioavailability of 95% (with a 
lower 90% CI of 81%) and with a median time to achieve peak plasma concentration of 2 hours 
post-dose in the fasted state. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
18 
CONFIDENTIAL 
There is a decrease in exposure observed with repeat dosing, due to induction of its own 
metabolism. The steady-state AUC(0-τ) and Cmax to single dose values were 0.73 and 1.0, 
respectively. Interpatient variability (CV%) in steady-state Cmax and AUC for 14 patients in the 
phase III study was determined to be 37.1% and 37.7%, respectively. 
 
Administration of dabrafenib capsules with food reduced the bioavailability (Cmax and AUC 
decreased by 51 % and 31 %, respectively) and delayed absorption of dabrafenib when compared 
to the fasted state. 
 
Distribution: Dabrafenib and its metabolites hydroxy-, carboxy-, and desmethyl-dabrafenib, are 
highly bound to plasma proteins with percent bound of 99.7, 96.3, 99.5, and 99.9%, respectively. 
The apparent volume of distribution of dabrafenib (Vc/F) is 70.3 L. 
 
Metabolism: The metabolism of dabrafenib is primarily mediated by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 to 
form hydroxy-dabrafenib, which is further oxidized via CYP3A4 to form carboxy-dabrafenib. 
Hydroxy-dabrafenib terminal half-life parallels that of parent with a half-life of 10 hours while the 
carboxy- and desmethyl-metabolites exhibited longer half-lives (21-22 hours). 
 
Elimination: Dabrafenib terminal half-life is 8 hours after oral administration. Apparent clearance 
was estimated to be 34.6 L/h using the recommended 150 mg BID dosing regimen. Fecal excretion 
is the major route of elimination after oral dosing, accounting for 71 % of a radioactive dose while 
urinary excretion accounted for 23 % of radioactivity. 
 
3.2.8 
Pharmaceutical Data  
 
Supplied: Dabrafenib 50 mg capsules are opaque, dark red capsules, monogrammed with ’GS 
TEW’ and ’50 mg’. Bottles contain 120 capsules, and a silica gel desiccant. 
 
Dabrafenib 75 mg capsules are opaque, dark pink capsules, monogrammed with ‘GS LHF’ and ‘75 
mg’. Bottles contain 120 capsules, and a silica gel desiccant. 
 
Dabrafenib capsules contain dabrafenib as dabrafenib mesylate, and the following non-medicinal 
ingredients: magnesium stearate, colloidal silicon dioxide, and microcrystalline cellulose. Capsule 
shells contain hypromellose, red iron oxide (E172), and titanium dioxide (E171). Monogramming 
ink contains black iron oxide, shellac, and propylene glycol. 
 
Stability: Refer to current IB. 
 
Storage: Store between 15-30°C. 
 
Route of Administration: Oral  
 
Missed Dose: If the missed dose is less than 6 hours late, dose should be taken as soon as patient 
remembers. If the missed dose is more than 6 hours late, dabrafenib should not be taken until next 
dose is due to be taken. 
 
3.3 
Adverse Events of the Trametinib and Dabrafenib Combination 
 
The most common adverse reactions (≥ 20%) for trametinib in combination with dabrafenib include 
pyrexia, fatigue, nausea, headache, chills, diarrhea, rash, arthralgia, hypertension, vomiting and 
cough. For details of the adverse events for trametinib, dabrafenib and the combination, please refer 
to the product monographs and investigator brochures.  
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
19 
CONFIDENTIAL 
3.4 
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) 
 
Stereotactic radiosurgery utilizes immobilization, detailed imaging methods and computerized 
3 dimensional treatment planning systems to deliver high doses of focal radiation in a highly precise 
manner in a single fraction or up to 5 fractions. Three general methods are used - Gamma Knife, 
Cyberknife and Linear Accelerator (Linac) based systems. 
 
The Gamma Knife is based on multiple cobalt sources arranged in a semi-circular arrangement. 
Each Cobalt source emits gamma ray irradiation, and the average beam energy is 1.25 MeV. A 
sophisticated collimation system allows for the convergence of multiple beams of irradiation to a 
focus (isocenter) within the treatment volume, effectively delivering a highly focused “shot” of 
radiation. Several shorts of radiation directed to the entire target volume results in the delivery of 
the prescribed treatment dose. Gamma Knife technology has been based on using an invasive head 
frame for immobilization; however, the Gamma Knife now has a dedicated frameless system that 
allows for frameless SRS delivery. 
 
Linac-based systems are the most common technology delivering SRS. Essentially, a high energy 
beam is shaped using different sized circular cones or multileaf collimators to conform around the 
target volume and delivery with high precision to the entire target volume. Linac-based SRS was 
historically based on using an invasive stereotactic head frame, however, non-invasive frameless 
head immobilizations systems are now available and in use to deliver frameless SRS. 
 
The Cyberknife consists of a miniaturized linac mounted onto a robotic arm. There is an integrated 
image-guidance system. The robot moves the linac around the patient and the 6MV beam is 
collimated using different sized circular collimators or even an MLC system specific to Cyberknife 
technology. The system allows for the prescribed dose to be delivered to the target volume with 
high precision and an established SRS technology. Due to the integrated image-guidance system 
and near-real time feedback of the patient’s cranium position, this system allows for frameless SRS. 
 
Regardless of the delivery system, standards for SRS have to be followed according to AAPM 
guidelines. Commissioning of any SRS delivery system is well defined in accordance with AAPM 
guidelines. The biological effect is the same regardless of the technology such that radiation induces 
DNA damage leading to cell kill. SRS, whether single fraction or multi-fractions (up to 5 fractions), 
is a standard radiotherapeutic application for brain metastases. Acute side effects consist of 
radiation-induced edema that may require use of dexamethasone and manifests typically as 
headache, nausea, vomiting. Rarely are more serious side effects observed which can consist of 
obstructive hydrocephalus (<1%). The most significant late side effect consists of radiation necrosis 
and asymptomatic radiographic necrosis can occur in 10-20% of patients with symptomatic 
radiation necrosis in <10% of patients. Radiation necrosis represents an inflammatory reaction of 
the radiated tissue and can mimic tumour progression. Typically is the patient experiences 
headache, nausea and vomiting then dexamethasone is the primary treatment, rarely if neurologic 
deficit the surgery may be required. Typically radiation necrosis resolves with use of 
dexamethasone and confirmatory MRI scans are required to show stability or regression as opposed 
to progression. With well-defined normal tissue guidelines for dose limits, damage to other 
sensitive tissues in the brain such as the optic structures and brainstem is extremely rare. Precise 
pre-treatment planning is necessary to avoid damage to these organs at risk, and the dose limits 
proposed in this trial represents well defined standards for safe practice. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
20 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03; AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06; AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
4.0 
STUDY POPULATION 
 
Patients with BRAF mutation positive melanoma with brain metastases with no contraindications 
to dabrafenib, trametinib and SRS will be eligible for this study. 
 
This study is designed to include women and minorities as appropriate, but is not designed to 
measure differences in intervention effects. 
 
4.1 
Eligibility Criteria 
 
There will be NO EXCEPTIONS to eligibility requirements at the time of registration. Questions 
about eligibility criteria should be addressed prior to calling for registration. 
 
The eligibility criteria for this study have been carefully considered. Eligibility criteria are 
standards used to ensure that patients who enter this study are medically appropriate candidates for 
this therapy. For the safety of the patients, as well as to ensure that the results of this study can be 
useful for making treatment decisions regarding other patients with similar diseases, it is important 
that no exceptions be made to these criteria for admission to the study. 
 
Patients must fulfil all of the following criteria to be eligible for admission to the study: 
 
4.1.1 
Histologically confirmed melanoma metastatic to brain and determined to be BRAF V600 mutated. 
 
4.1.2 
Previous Therapy 
 
Systemic Therapy: 
 
Patients who have received prior systemic anti-cancer treatment (including single agent PD1 or 
combination immunotherapy) are eligible. 
 
Patients must have recovered from prior treatment related toxicity related to prior systemic therapy 
with a window of 4 weeks since previous treatment. 
 
Prior systemic treatment in the adjuvant setting is allowed. 
 
Radiation and Surgery: 
 
Patients may have received prior whole brain radiation with progressive and/or new brain 
metastases to be treated with radiosurgery such that up to 10 metastases will be treated according 
to protocol. In total (previously treated in addition to study eligible metastases), there can be no 
more than 10 metastases in the brain.  
 
Patients who have had prior surgery and whole brain radiation or cavity radiosurgery for brain 
metastases are eligible if they are planned for radiosurgery to up to 10 intact metastases and treated 
per study protocol. A minimum of 2 weeks from prior surgery is required before the study protocol 
can be delivered to eligible metastases. In total (previously treated in addition to study eligible 
metastases), there can be no more than 10 metastases in the brain. 
 
4.1.3 
Age ≥ 18 years. 
 
4.1.4 
Karnofsky Performance Status of 70-100 (Appendix I). 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
21 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
4.1.5 
Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. 
 
4.1.6 
Presence of measurable disease (i.e. present with at least one measurable CNS lesion per RECIST 
1.1). 
 
4.1.7 
Presence of 1-10 brain metastases as confirmed on a thin slice axial T1 post-gadolinium MRI 
sequence. The maximum diameter of a single brain lesion should be < 4 cm, and presence of a 
measurable lesion > 1 cm based on baseline MRI of brain. 
 
4.1.8 
All CNS metastases amenable to single fraction SRS and or fractionated SRS. Hemorrhagic lesions 
are allowed if the treating radiation oncologist deems the lesion amenable to focal SRS. 
 
4.1.9 
Able to swallow and retain oral medication and must not have any clinically significant 
gastrointestinal abnormalities that may alter absorption such as malabsorption syndrome or major 
resection of the stomach or bowels. 
 
4.1.10 Laboratory Requirements 
(must be done within 14 days prior to registration) 
 
Hematology 
Absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) 
> 1.2 x 109/L  
Hemoglobin 
≥ 90 g/L 
Platelets  
> 100 x 109/L  
Coagulation 
PT/INRa and PTT 
≤ 1.3 x upper normal limit (UNL) 
Chemistry 
Serum creatinineb 
or: 
creatinine clearance 
≤ 1.5 x UNL  
 
> 50ml/min 
Total bilirubinc 
< 1.5 x UNL 
Alanine aminotransferase (AST) and 
aspartate aminotransferase (ALT) 
< 2.5 x UNL 
Cardiac 
(within 28 days of 
registration) 
Left Ventricular Ejection fraction 
(LVEF)d 
≥ LLN  
a. 
Subjects receiving anticoagulation treatment may be allowed to participate with INR established within the 
therapeutic range prior to randomization. 
b. 
If serum creatinine is > 1.5 UNL, calculate creatinine clearance using standard Cockcroft-Gault formula 
(below). Creatinine clearance must be ≥ 50 mL/min to be eligible. 
c. 
Direct if patient known to have Gilbert’s syndrome. 
d. 
Either ECHO or MUGA scan but same modality must be used throughout the study 
Creatinine clearance as calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula:  
 
Females: 
GFR = 1.04 x (140-age) x weight in kg  
 
 
 
serum creatinine in μmol/L  
 
Males: 
GFR = 1.23 x (140-age) x weight in kg  
 
 
 
serum creatinine in μmol/L  
 
4.1.10  Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory 
requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to registration and prior to tests which 
are considered to be study specific (see Section 5). 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
22 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03; AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06; AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
Patients who cannot give informed consent (i.e. mentally incompetent patients, or those physically 
incapacitated such as comatose patients) are not to be recruited into the study. Patients competent 
but physically unable to sign the consent form may have the document signed by their nearest 
relative or legal guardian. Each patient will be provided with a full explanation of the study before 
consent is requested. 
 
4.1.12  Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Patients registered on this trial must be 
treated and followed at the participating centre. This implies there must be reasonable geographical 
limits (for example: 1 ½ hour's driving distance) placed on patients being considered for this trial. 
(Call the CCTG office (613-533-6430) if questions arise regarding the interpretation of this 
criterion.) Investigators must assure themselves the patients registered on this trial will be available 
for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up. 
 
4.1.13 In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 2 working days of patient 
registration. 
 
4.1.14 Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive 
method. A woman is considered to be of “childbearing potential” if she has had menses at any time 
in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, “effective 
contraception” also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or 
with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or 
bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously 
celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of 
contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive 
measures. 
 
Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the 
Pre-Study Evaluation (see Section 5.0); this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a 
false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and 
partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some 
cancers. Patients will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy. 
 
4.2 
Ineligibility Criteria 
 
Patients who fulfill any of the following criteria are not eligible for admission to the study: 
 
4.2.1 
Prior treatment with a BRAF inhibitor or a MEK inhibitor. 
 
4.2.2 
Known ocular or primary mucosal melanoma. 
 
4.2.3 
Current use of a prohibited medication as described in Section 7.2. 
 
4.2.4 
History of malignancy with confirmed activating RAS mutation at any time. Note: Prospective 
RAS testing is not required. However, if the results of previous RAS testing are known, they must 
be used in assessing eligibility. 
 
4.2.5 
History of malignancy other than disease under study within 3 years of study enrolment, except for 
patients with a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer, or indolent malignancies 
such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia are eligible. (Please call CCTG if any questions about the 
interpretation of this criterion). 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
23 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03; AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
4.2.6 
Leptomeningeal metastases or metastases causing spinal cord compression that are symptomatic or 
untreated or not stable for ≥ 3 months (must be documented by imaging). Subjects on a stable dose 
of corticosteroids > 2 weeks or who have been off of corticosteroids for at least 2 weeks can be 
enrolled with approval of the CCTG. 
 
4.2.7 
Any serious or unstable pre-existing medical conditions (aside from malignancy exceptions 
specified above), psychiatric disorders, or other conditions that could interfere with the subject’s 
safety, obtaining informed consent, or compliance with study procedures. 
 
4.2.8 
A history of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection (subjects with 
laboratory evidence of cleared HBV and/or HCV will be permitted). 
 
4.2.9 
A history or evidence of cardiovascular risk including any of the following: 
 
A QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Bazett’s formula (QTcB) ≥ 480 msec; 
 
A history or evidence of current clinically significant uncontrolled arrhythmias (Exception: 
subjects with atrial fibrillation controlled for > 30 days prior to dosing are eligible). 
 
A history of acute coronary syndromes (including myocardial infarction or unstable angina), 
coronary angioplasty, or stenting within 6 months prior to registration. 
 
A history or evidence of current ≥ Class II congestive heart failure as defined by the New York 
Heart Association (NYHA) guidelines; 
 
Patients with intra-cardiac defibrillators; 
 
Abnormal cardiac valve morphology (≥ grade 2) documented by echocardiogram (subjects 
with grade 1 abnormalities [i.e. mild regurgitation/stenosis] can be entered on study). Subjects 
with moderate valvular thickening should not be entered on study. 
 
Treatment refractory hypertension defined as a blood pressure of systolic > 140 mmHg and/or 
diastolic > 90 mm Hg which cannot be controlled by anti-hypertensive therapy. 
 
4.2.10 A history or current evidence/risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or central serous retinopathy 
(CSR) including: 
a. Presence of predisposing factors to RVO or CSR (e.g. uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular 
hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or a history of 
hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes); or 
b. Visible retinal pathology as assessed by ophthalmic examination that is considered a risk factor 
for RVO or CSR such as: 
i. 
Evidence of new optic disc cupping; 
ii. Evidence of new visual field defects on automated perimetry; 
iii. Intraocular pressure >21 mmHg as measured by tonography. 
 
4.2.11 Known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related 
to the study treatments, their excipients, and/or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
24 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06; AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
4.2.12 Pregnant or lactating women. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum 
pregnancy test within 14 days prior to registration. Men and women of childbearing potential who 
do not agree to use adequate contraception (intrauterine device, double barrier method of birth 
control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of the study participation and 4 months 
after last dose of study treatment. (Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant, or 
should a man father a child, while participating in this study, she/he should inform the treating 
physician immediately.) Note: Hormonal-based methods (e.g. oral contraceptives) are not 
permitted as contraception due to potential drug-drug interactions with dabrafenib. 
 
4.2.13 History of interstitial lung disease or active pneumonitis. 
 
4.2.14 Any one brain metastases > 4 cm in maximal diameter , and/or presence of brain metastases of less 
than 1 cm. 
 
4.2.15 Brainstem metastases. 
 
4.2.16 Contraindications to MRI and/or Gadolinium contrast or stereotactic brain radiation therapy. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
25 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06; AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
5.0 
PATIENT EVALUATION FLOWSHEET: PRE-TREATMENT, ON STUDY, AND AFTER 
TREATMENT  
 
All patients entered on study must be evaluated according to the schedule outlined below with 
documentation submitted according to the schedule in Appendix III. 
 
Required Investigations 
Pre-study 
(< 14 days 
prior to 
registration) 
Within 28 
days prior 
to 
registration 
Day 1 each 
cycle, and 
as 
clinically 
indicated 
Every 8 
weeks from 
date of 
registration  
4 weeks 
after 
completion 
of protocol 
therapy 
3 month follow-up 
(only required for pts 
without confirmed PD 
and ongoing 
toxicities1) 
History and Physical Exam 
 
 
 
 
 
 
including: height, weight, Karnofsky 
Performance Status, clinical tumour 
measurements (if applicable) 
X 
 
X2 
 
X 
 
Blood pressure, heart rate, temperature 
(assessed by medical personnel) 
X 
 
X2 
 
X 
X 
Hematology* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CBC, differential, platelets 
X 
 
X2 
 
X3 
X 
Coagulation* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PT/INR and PTT 
X4 
 
 
 
 
 
Biochemistry* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, 
magnesium, calcium, albumin, alkaline 
phosphatase, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, blood 
glucose (random, unless abnormal then fasting 
required), creatinine and creatinine clearance5, 
LDH, total protein 
X 
 
X2 
 
X3 
X 
Radiology6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis (contrast 
enhanced) and other scans as required to 
document all sites of disease 
 
X7 
 
X8 
X9,10 
X9 
MRI of brain (required) 
 
X7 
 
X8 
X9,10 
X9 
Other Investigations 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pregnancy Test11 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
EKG 
 
 
as clinically indicated 
ECHO/MUGA6 
 
X4 
 
 
 
 
Ophthalmologic exam 
 
 
as clinically indicated 
Dermatology exam 
 
 
as clinically indicated 
Adverse events12 
X13 
continuously 
X1 
 
footnotes on next page 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
26 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06 
 
* 
Pre-treatment blood draws and physical exams may be done up to two working days prior to treatment if necessary (e.g. Friday for 
treatment on Monday, or to accommodate holidays). In order to ensure that nadir counts are not missed, every effort should be made to do 
interim blood draws within 24 hours of the day specified in the protocol. 
1. 
Every three months thereafter to follow adverse events felt related until resolved to ≤ grade 2. 
2. 
Labs do NOT need to be repeated C1D1 but vital signs should be done on day 1 of each cycle, including cycle 1.  
3. 
At 4 weeks then every 3 months thereafter to follow abnormal results felt related until resolved to ≤ grade 2. 
4. 
Then as clinically indicated. 
5. 
Creatinine clearance required if serum creatinine > 1.5 ULN. To be measured directly by 24 hour urine sampling or calculated by 
Cockcroft Formula (see protocol Section 4.1.11). 
6. 
To ensure comparability, baseline X-rays/scans/LVEF evaluation must be performed using identical techniques. 
7. 
35 days if negative. 
8. 
+/- 14 day window to aid in scheduling. 
9. 
To be done additionally every 3 months thereafter until relapse or progression for patients with CR, PR, or SD response. 
10. 
Patients with a CR or PR should have scans repeated after 4 weeks to confirm response. 
11. 
For women of childbearing potential only. Required within 14 days prior to registration. 
12. 
Adverse Events to be evaluated using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (see Appendix IV). 
13. 
Within 7 days prior to registration; again within 24 hours prior to first treatment. 
 
5.1 
Follow-up for Ineligible Patients 
 
The follow-up requirements for ineligible patients who have received no protocol therapy include 
submission of the Baseline Report. Data submission for ineligible participants who have received 
at least one dose of protocol therapy should be followed according to the protocol to allow for 
treatment and adverse event assessment.  

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
27 
CONFIDENTIAL 
6.0 
ENTRY/REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
 
6.1 
Entry Procedures 
 
All registrations will be done through the CCTG web-based, password-operated Electronic Data 
Capture (EDC) system. Complete details regarding obtaining a password, accessing the system and 
registering patients will be provided at the time of study activation and will also be included in the 
“EDC Data Management Guidebook”, posted on the IND.224 trial specific web-site. If sites 
experience difficulties accessing the system and/or registering patients please contact the help desk 
(link in EDC) or the IND.224 Study Coordinator. 
 
All eligible patients enrolled on the study by the participating treatment centre will be assigned a 
serial number which must be used on all documentation and correspondence with CCTG. 
 
The following information will be required: 
 trial code (CCTG IND.224) 
 patient's initials (may be coded)  
 informed consent version date, date signed by patient, name of person conducting consent 
discussion and date signed 
 confirmation of the requirements listed in Section 4.0, including dates of essential tests and 
actual laboratory values 
 height and weight 
 
6.2 
Registration 
 
Registration will be provided electronically. 
 
Note: 
The validity of results of the trial depends on the authenticity of and the follow-up of all patients 
entered into the trial. Under no circumstances, therefore, may an allocated patient’s data be 
withdrawn prior to final analysis, unless the participant withdraws from the trial and requests that 
data collection/submission cease from the point in time of withdrawal. 
 
All eligible patients admitted to the trial will be followed by the coordinating centre. It is the 
responsibility of the physician in charge to satisfy himself or herself that the patient is indeed 
eligible before requesting registration/randomization. 
 
All registered patients are to be followed until death or until sites are informed by CCTG that further 
follow-up is no longer required. The follow-up requirements for ineligible patients who have 
received no protocol therapy include submission of the Baseline Report. Data submission for 
ineligible participants who have received at least one dose of protocol therapy should be followed 
according to the protocol to allow for treatment and adverse event assessment. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
28 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03 
7.0 
TREATMENT PLAN 
 
Although the Canadian Cancer Trials Group acts as the coordinating agency for the trial, the 
responsibility for treatment of patients rests with the individual investigator. 
 
In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 2 working days of patient 
registration. 
 
Patients should begin taking dabrafenib and trametinib a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 14 
days prior to commencement of SRS. 
 
There will be 2 cohorts of patients. Each cohort is based on the number of brain metastases at 
presentation on T1-post gadolinium volumetric axial MRI. 
 
Cohort 1: minimum 20 to 25 patients 
 
Patients with 1-4 metastases will receive focal SRS to all lesions and dabrafenib + trametinib. 
Agents will begin a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 14 days prior to SRS and continue post-
SRS until progression or unacceptable toxicity. 
 
Cohort 2: minimum 20 to 25 patients 
 
Patients with 5-10 metastases will receive focal SRS to all lesions and dabrafenib + trametinib. 
Agents will begin a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 14 days prior to SRS and continue post-
SRS until progression or unacceptable toxicity.  
 
7.1 
Chemotherapy Treatment Plan 
 
7.1.1 
Drug Administration 
 
Cohort 
Agent(s) 
Route 
Dose 
Frequency 
Schedule 
1 & 2 
Dabrafenib 
PO 
150 mg 
BID 
Continuously* 
Trametinib  
PO 
2 mg 
OD 
* 
A treatment cycle (reporting period) is defined as 28 days. There will be no breaks between cycles. 
 
7.1.2 
Premedication 
 
Not required. Prophylactic corticosteroids are not required but may be used prior to SRS based on 
institutional standards and investigator discretion. The following is an example regimen: 
• 
Prophylactic dexamethasone at 10 mg IV 1 hour prior to start of SRS. 
• 
Prophylactic dexamethasone at 4 mg po in am per day of fractionated SRS is permitted 
according to institutional practice. 
 
7.1.3 
Dose Modifications 
 
For New Primary Cutaneous Malignancies:  
No dose modifications are required. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
29 
CONFIDENTIAL 
For New Primary Non-Cutaneous Malignancies:  
No dose modifications are required for trametinib. If used in combination with dabrafenib, 
permanently discontinue dabrafenib in patients who develop RAS mutation-positive non-cutaneous 
malignancies. 
 
Doses will be reduced for adverse reactions as described in Table 2. 
 
Dose Level 
Dabrafenib 
Trametinib 
-1 
100 mg orally twice daily 
1.5 mg orally once daily 
-2 
75 mg orally twice daily 
1 mg orally once daily 
-3 
50 mg orally twice daily 
Permanently discontinue 
-4 
Permanently discontinue 
 
 
Table 2: Recommended Dose Modifications for Trametinib and Dabrafenib Administered in 
Combination 
 
Severity of Adverse Reaction* 
Trametinib 
Dabrafenib 
Febrile drug reaction 
 
 
• 
Fever of 38.5-40°C without 
complications 
• 
Trametinib may be continued at 
the same dose.  
• 
Withhold dabrafenib until fever 
resolves. Then resume at same or 
lower dose level. 
• 
Fever higher than 40°C  
 
• 
Fever complicated by rigors, 
hypotension, dehydration, or renal 
failure 
• 
Withhold trametinib until fever 
resolves. Then resume trametinib 
at same or lower dose level. 
• 
Withhold dabrafenib until fever 
resolves. Then resume at a lower 
dose level. 
Or 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
dabrafenib. 
Cutaneous 
 
 
• 
Grade 2 rash (tolerable) 
• 
Reduce dose of trametinib by 0.5 
mg or discontinue in patients 
taking 1 mg daily 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated.  
• 
Intolerable Grade 2 rash or > 
Grade 3 rash 
• 
Withhold trametinib for up to 3 
weeks. If improved within 3 
weeks, resume at a lower dose 
(reduced by 0.5 mg) or 
discontinue in patients taking 1 
mg daily 
• 
Withhold until adverse reaction 
resolves or improves to Grade 1 
and reduce by one dose level when 
resuming therapy 
• 
Intolerable Grade 2 or > Grade 3 
rash that does not improve within 
3 weeks despite interruption of 
dosing 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
trametinib 
• 
Permanently discontinue treatment 
with dabrafenib 
 
table continues on next page … 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
30 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Severity of Adverse Reaction* 
Trametinib 
Dabrafenib 
Cardiac 
 
 
• 
Asymptomatic, absolute decrease 
in LVEF of 10% or greater from 
baseline and is below institutional 
lower limits of normal (LLN) 
from pre-treatment value 
• 
Withhold trametinib for up to 4 
weeks. 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as clinical 
indicated.  
• 
Asymptomatic, absolute decrease 
in LVEF of 10% or greater from 
baseline and is below LLN that 
improves to normal LVEF value 
within 4 weeks following 
interruption of trametinib 
• 
Resume trametinib at a lower dose 
(reduced by 0.5 mg) or 
discontinue in patients taking 1 
mg daily 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated. 
• 
Absolute decrease in LVEF of 
10% or greater from baseline and 
is below LLN that does not 
improve to normal LVEF value 
within 4 weeks following 
interruption of trametinib 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
trametinib 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated. 
• 
Symptomatic congestive heart 
failure 
 
• 
Absolute decrease in LVEF of 
greater than 20% from baseline 
that is below LLN 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
trametinib 
• 
Withhold dabrafenib until adverse 
reaction resolves and resume 
dabrafenib at the same dose or at a 
reduced dose level. 
Ocular Toxicities 
 
 
• 
Grade 2-3 retinal pigment 
epithelial detachments (RPED) 
• 
Withhold trametinib for up to 3 
weeks. 
 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose.  Monitor as 
clinically indicated. 
• 
Grade 2-3 RPED that improves to 
Grade 0-1 within 3 weeks 
• 
If improved within 3 weeks, 
resume trametinib at a lower dose 
(reduced by 0.5 mg) or 
discontinue in patients taking 1 
mg daily 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated. 
• 
Grade 2-3 RPED that does not 
improve to at least Grade 1 within 
3 weeks OR recurrence of RPED 
(any Grade) after dose interruption 
or reduction 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
trametinib 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated 
• 
Retinal vein occlusion 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
trametinib. 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated. 
• 
Uveitis that responds to local 
ocular therapy 
• 
Trametinib may be continued at 
the same dose 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated.  
 
• 
Uveitis that does not improve 
despite ocular therapy 
• 
Withhold trametinib until adverse 
reaction resolves and resume at 
the same or a reduced dose 
• 
Withhold dabrafenib until adverse 
reaction resolves and reduce by 
one dose level when resuming 
therapy 
Pulmonary 
 
 
• 
Interstitial lung 
disease/pneumonitis 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
trametinib. 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated.  
 
table continues on next page … 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
31 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Severity of Adverse Reaction* 
Trametinib 
Dabrafenib 
Other 
 
 
• 
Grade 1 or Grade 2 (tolerable) 
Trametinib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated. 
• 
Dabrafenib may be continued at 
the same dose. Monitor as 
clinically indicated. 
• 
Grade 2 (intolerable) OR Grade 3 
adverse reaction 
• 
Withhold trametinib. If adverse 
reaction resolves or improves to 
Grade 1, reduce by one dose level 
when resuming therapy. 
• 
Withhold dabrafenib until adverse 
reaction resolves or improves to 
grade 1 and reduce by one dose 
level when resuming therapy. 
• 
Grade 4 adverse reaction OR 
Grade 3 adverse reaction that does 
not improve to Grade 0-1 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
trametinib. 
• 
Permanently discontinue 
dabrafenib OR withhold therapy 
until adverse reaction resolves or 
improves to Grade 1 and reduce 
by one dose level when resuming 
therapy. 
* 
Adverse events will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (see 
Appendix V). 
 
7.2 
Concomitant Medications and Non-Drug Therapies 
 
7.2.1 
Permitted Medications and Non-Drug Therapies 
 
The investigator must be informed as soon as possible about any medication taken from the time 
of screening until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. Any concomitant medication(s), 
including dietary supplements, taken during the study will be recorded in the eCRF. The minimum 
requirement is that drug name, dose, and the dates of administration are to be recorded. 
Additionally, a complete list of all prior surgical procedures will be recorded in the eCRF. 
 
Subjects should receive full supportive care during the study, including transfusions of blood and 
blood products, and treatment with antibiotics, anti-emetics, anti-diarrheals, and analgesics, and 
other care as deemed appropriate, and in accordance with their institutional guidelines. Use of 
anticoagulants such as warfarin is permitted provided that INR is monitored in accordance with 
local institutional practice. 
 
7.2.2 
Prohibited Medications and Non-Drug Therapies 
 
The use of certain medications and illicit drugs within 28 days or 5 half lives, whichever is shorter, 
prior to registration and for the duration of the study will not be allowed. 
 
The following medications or non-drug therapies are also prohibited while on treatment in this 
study: 
• 
Other anti-cancer therapies; 
• 
Other investigational drugs; 
• 
Antiretroviral drugs (Note: Subjects with known HIV are ineligible for study participation); 
• 
Herbal remedies (e.g. St. John’s Wort); 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
32 
CONFIDENTIAL 
• 
Dabrafenib is metabolized primarily by Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and CYP3A4. Co-
administration of dabrafenib with ketoconazole, a CYP3A4 inhibition, or with gemfibrozil, a 
CYP2C8 inhibitor, resulted in increases in dabrafenib AUC of 71% and 47%, respectively. 
Drugs that are strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A and CYP2C8 (see list in Table 3) may 
only be used under special circumstances (e.g. as a single use for a procedure) while treatment 
with study drug is interrupted as they may alter dabrafenib concentrations; consider therapeutic 
substitutions for these medications. Approval of the CCTG Senior Investigator is required in 
these situations. The list may be modified based on emerging data. Refer to the SPM for the 
most current list. 
 
Table 3: Prohibited Medications 
 
PROHIBITED  
– strong inducers of CYP3A or CYP2C8, since concentrations of dabrafenib may be 
decreased 
Class/Therapeutic Area 
Drugs/Agents 
Antibiotics 
Rifamycin class agents (e.g., rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine),  
Anticonvulsant 
Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine phenobarbital, phenytoin, s-mephenytoin  
Miscellaneous 
bosentan, St. John’s wort 
PROHIBITED  
– Strong inhibitors of CYP3A, or CYP2C8 since concentrations of dabrafenib may be 
increased 
Class/Therapeutic Area 
Drugs/Agents 
Antibiotics 
Clarithromycin, telithromycin, troleandomycin 
Antidepressant 
Nefazodone 
Antifungals 
Itraconazole, ketoconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole 
Hyperlipidemia 
Gemfibrozil  
Antiretroviral 
ritonavir, saquinavir, atazanavir 
Miscellaneous 
Conivaptan  
 
7.2.3 
Medications to be Used With Caution 
 
The following medications should be used with caution as their concentrations may be altered by 
dabrafenib or they may alter dabrafenib concentrations: 
• 
Drugs that are moderate inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A and CYP2C8 as they may alter 
concentrations of dabrafenib. 
• 
Dabrafenib has been shown to induce CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 in vivo using midazolam 
(CYP3A4 substrate) and S-warfarin (CYP2C9 substrate). Dabrafenib is an in vitro inducer of 
CYP2B6 and other enzymes such as CYP2C8, CYP2C19, UDP-glucuronyl transferases. 
Transporters may also be affected. Co-administration of dabrafenib and medications which are 
affected by the induction of these enzymes (including warfarin) and transporters may result in 
loss of efficacy. If co-administration of these medications is necessary, investigators should 
monitor subjects for loss of efficacy or consider substitutions of these medications. A partial 
list of these medications is provided in the SPM. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
33 
CONFIDENTIAL 
• 
Therapeutic level dosing of warfarin can be used with close monitoring of PT/INR by the site. 
Exposure decreased by 37% due to enzyme induction when on treatment, thus warfarin dosing 
may need to be adjusted based upon PT/INR. Consequently, when discontinuing dabrafenib, 
warfarin exposure may be increased and thus close monitoring via PT/INR and warfarin dose 
adjustments must be made as clinically appropriate. Prophylactic low dose warfarin may be 
given to maintain central catheter patency. 
• 
Dabrafenib solubility is pH-dependent with decreased solubility at higher pH. Drugs such as 
proton pump inhibitors that inhibit gastric acid secretion to elevate gastric pH may decrease 
the solubility of dabrafenib and reduce its bioavailability. No clinical study has been conducted 
to evaluate the effect of pH on dabrafenib pharmacokinetics. In an ad-hoc analysis, no 
differences in Cmax and AUC were noted between subjects who reported taking pH-elevating 
products relative to other subjects. Due to the theoretical risk that pH-elevating agents may 
decrease oral bioavailability and exposure to dabrafenib, these medicinal products that increase 
gastric pH should be used with caution when administered with dabrafenib. 
 
7.3 
Radiation Treatment Plan 
 
7.3.1 
Pre-Treatment Guidelines 
 
Patients must be suitable candidates for serial MRI imaging on study. If claustrophobic, then 
sedatives may be given as per institutional standards for the MRI and SRS procedure. 
 
Patients may be given 10 mg of intravenous decadron at the time of SRS at the discretion of the 
treating physician, and for 5 fractions SRS then daily oral decadron may be given at the discretion 
of the treating physician (typically 4 mg orally per day is practiced to start day 1 of fractionated 
SRS and discontinued with no taper once complete). 
 
7.3.2 
Equipment and Treatment Delivery 
 
7.3.2.1 Equipment 
 
Single fraction SRS must be delivered using a commissioned delivery apparatus and treatment 
planning system for brain SRS. The technology may be a Gamma Knife, Cyberknife or linac-based 
system equipped with isocentric circular collimators or a multi-leaf collimator with a leaf width of 
no more than 5 mm. 
 
For 5 fraction SRS, a linac system equipped with a multi-leaf collimator and leaf width of no more 
than 5 mm may be used. In this situation, the beam energy must be 6 MV and image guidance 
applied with cone-beam CT or a stereoscopic X-ray imaging system. With respect to treatment 
planning, either fixed field intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy 
may be used. Gamma Knife and Cyberknife technology may also be used to deliver 5 fraction SRS. 
 
7.3.2.2 Treatment Delivery 
 
Treatment delivery will be based on the apparatus used. Cyberknife systems and Gamma Knife 
systems are dedicated SRS systems with their own treatment planning software and procedures. 
For linac-based SRS, either cone based or MLC based single fraction SRS may be delivered. Cone 
based SRS is usually delivered using multiple non-coplanar arcs. For MLC based SRS, varying 
treatment delivery methods can be used such as fixed field intensity modulated radiotherapy or 
volumetric modulated arc therapy.  

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
34 
CONFIDENTIAL 
7.3.3 
Positioning, Immobilization and Localization/Simulation 
 
7.3.3.1 Positioning 
 
Patients are supine with their arms by their side. 
 
7.3.3.2 Immobilization  
 
Single fraction SRS must be delivered with the head immobilized using an invasive stereotactic 
head frame or non-invasive relocatable head frame specifically approved by Health Canada for 
brain SRS. For 5 fraction SRS, either a relocatable non-invasive head frame or a thermoplastic head 
mask may be used as per department policy and procedures. 
 
7.3.3.3 Localization Imaging/Simulation 
 
Patients will have a CT simulation (3-D treatment planning volumetric imaging) with the patient 
supine and head immobilized using immobilization systems as described in 7.3.3.2. Typical 
practice is to use 1 mm CT slice thickness (no more than 2 mm slice thickness permitted). IV 
contrast may be administered for simulation at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist as 
per departmental policy and procedures, but not necessary. The treatment planning MRI will be 
fused to the treatment planning CT for contouring and treatment planning. The MRI may be done 
by the diagnostic imaging department, and the patient does not have to be in treatment position 
with the immobilization device in place. For Gamma Knife technology, MRI only simulation and 
planning is often performed. Institutional practice will be respected and must comply with known 
standards per the relevant AAPM reports (in particular TG report 54 and 135). 
 
If image artifacts, for example as a result of dental fillings, are present and will affect the dose 
calculation, the method in which they are accounted for must be stated. Specifically, describe the 
regions of artifacts that were contoured and state the density used to override the regions. 
 
7.3.4 
Volume Definitions 
 
7.3.4.1 Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) 
 
The GTV will be defined as the contrast enhanced tumor on the post-gadolinium T1-MRI. If 
contrast is used on the treatment planning CT this may aid delineation of the target but the final 
target will be based on the MRI imaging. 
 
7.3.4.2 Planning Target Volume (PTV) 
 
A margin may be applied as a three dimensional expansion beyond the GTV as per institutional 
practice for single fraction SRS to create a PTV, and can range from 0 to 2 mm. For 5 fraction SRS, 
a PTV expansion margin beyond the GTV should be applied, and may range from 0 to 3 mm. 
 
7.3.4.3 Organs at Risk (OAR) 
 
Each lens will be contoured in their entirety as per MRI. 
 
Each globe will be contoured in their entirety as per MRI. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
35 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Each optic nerve will be contoured as per MRI from its insertion on the globe to the point where it 
forms the optic chiasm. 
 
The optic chiasm will be contoured as per MRI. 
 
The entire brainstem will be contoured with the cranial extent defined by the junction with the 
thalamus and caudally to the level of the foramen magnum. 
 
Each cochlea will be contoured in their entirety as per MRI. 
 
The entire normal brain will be contoured as per MRI. 
 
7.3.4.4 Planning Organ at Risk Volume (PRV) 
 
PRV is not required. 
 
7.3.4.5 Unspecified Tissue 
 
For IMRT (which also includes VMAT) plans, a volume known as unspecified tissue must be 
identified. This volume is defined as tissue contained within the skin but which is not included in 
any other contoured structure including the PTVs. This is relevant to fractionated SRS as opposed 
to single fraction SRS. 
 
7.3.4.6 Nomenclature 
 
Each GTV will be numbered according to 1 to 10 as per GTV1, GTV2, GTV3, GTV4, GTV5, 
GTV6, GTV7, GTV8, GTV9, GTV10. If PTV is applied, then the corresponding number should 
be applied such that the PTV for GTV1 would be named PTV1, for GTV2 the corresponding PTV 
would be named PTV2 and so forth up to 10. 
 
Naming according to dose is not feasible as each target may be treated with the same dose. 
 
For the OAR that are bilateral then preceding the name should be R or L for right and left, for 
example, R cochlea. 
 
7.3.5 
Dose Specification 
 
7.3.5.1 Targets 
 
Each target will have a total dose prescribed to an isodose surface which encompasses the margin 
of the contoured target (GTV or PTV). Typically the dose is prescribed to the highest isodose line 
covering the GTV and/or PTV, and the range of acceptable isodose surfaces to prescribe is 45% to 
95%. If the treatment planning system is such that the prescribed dose is to a point, or to the mean 
or median dose to the PTV or CTV, that is acceptable and needs to be recorded. 
 
Dose is to be specified in Gray (Gy). 
 
The prescribed dose is determined according to the maximal diameter of the GTV and/or PTV 
according to the following table. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
36 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03 
Maximum SRS dose based on lesion maximum diameter per baseline treatment planning MRI 
GTV and/or PTV less than 2.0 cm in widest diameter  
20 Gy 
GTV and/or PTV= 2.0 - < 3.0 cm in widest diameter 
18 Gy 
GTV and/or PTV= ≥ 3.0 - ≤ 4.0 cm in widest diameter 
15 Gy or 25-35 Gy in 5 fractions 
fractionated radiosurgery 
 
7.3.5.2 Organs at Risk 
 
The critical organs at risk, which include the lens, globes, optic nerves, optic chiasm, brainstem, 
cochlea and normal brain, will be contoured. For single fraction SRS, the maximum point dose to 
each lens should not exceed 5 Gy, each globe should not exceed 8 Gy, optic chiasm should not 
exceed 10 Gy, each optic nerve should not exceed 10 Gy, brainstem should not exceed 15 Gy, and 
for each cochlea should not exceed 8 Gy. 
 
For 5 fractions radiosurgery, the maximum point dose to each lens should not exceed 5 Gy, each 
globe should not exceed 20 Gy, optic chiasm should not exceed 25 Gy, each optic nerve should not 
exceed 25 Gy, brainstem should not exceed 25 Gy, and for each cochlea (recommended but not 
mandated) should not exceed 15 Gy.  
 
7.3.5.3 Unspecified Normal Tissue Dose Limits 
 
The unspecified normal tissue volume receiving prescription should be minimized as per 
department protocol. 
 
7.3.5.4 Fractionation  
 
Single fraction SRS to a target GTV or PTV is delivered in one treatment over one day. In cases of 
multiple metastases where the department wants to deliver single fraction SRS over several days, 
all lesions must be treated a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 14 days of treatment planning. 
 
For multiple fraction SRS (5 fraction), treatment typically is delivered in 5 consecutive days, 
Monday to Friday, however may span over a weekend or be interrupted by a machine service day 
such that the intended treatment should be completed within 16 days from treatment planning. 
 
Combinations of single fraction and fractionated are permitted based on the radiation oncologist 
practice. The above guidelines must be adhered to with respect to treatment completion of the single 
fraction and multiple fraction SRS. 
 
7.3.5.5 Corrections for Interruptions  
 
None. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
37 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06 
7.3.6 
Treatment Planning 
 
7.3.6.1 Beam Energy 
 
Gamma Knife technology is based on the Cobalt sources and Cyberknife is based on 6 MV photons. 
For linac delivery a beam energy of 6 MV is desirable. However, flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams 
of other energies is allowed with some additional explanation from the participating centre on why 
this energy is being used. 
 
7.3.6.2 Beam Arrangement 
 
Gamma Knife treatments are based on multiple cobalt beams converging at the isocenter to deliver 
a shot of radiation and multiple shots used to deliver the dose to the intended target. Cyberknife 
treatments are based on cone or MLC based delivery. Linac-based SRS treatments can be based on 
arc delivery using cones, or MLC based IMRT or VMAT. 
 
7.3.6.3 Beam Modifiers 
 
No physical wedges are permitted. 
 
7.3.6.4 Planning Priorities 
 
The protocol priorities are: 1) critical OAR, 2) PTV coverage, 3) non-critical OAR, 4) unspecified 
normal tissue. 
 
7.3.6.5 Inhomogeneity Corrections 
 
Correction for inhomogeneity is not mandatory and procedures based on department policies 
should be adhered to. 
 
7.3.6.6 Acceptable Dose Heterogeneity 
 
Dose heterogeneity is generally accepted in very small volumes especially with Gamma Knife and 
Cyberknife delivery within the GTV and/or PTV.  
 
Dose heterogeneity will vary with different SRS delivery methods, with different target sizes and 
with number of targets.  
 
For single fraction SRS treatments delivered with treatment modalities other than Gamma Knife 
and when there is no overlap with OARs, the point dose variation within the GTV or PTV can 
range from 90% to 160% of the prescribed dose. If there is overlap with OARs, the point dose 
variation within the PTV can range from 85% to 160% of the prescribed dose. For Gamma Knife 
treatments, if the dose prescription criterion is met (i.e. dose is prescribed to the 45-95% isodose 
line) the dose heterogeneity is considered acceptable. 
 
For fractionated delivery with treatment modalities other than Gamma Knife and when there is no 
overlap with OARs, the point dose variation within the GTV and/or PTV can range from 90% to 
130% of the prescribed dose. If there is overlap with OARs, the point dose variation within the 
PTV can range from 85% to 130% of the prescribed dose. For Gamma Knife treatments, if the dose 
prescription criterion is met (i.e. dose is prescribed to the 45-95% isodose line) the dose 
heterogeneity is considered acceptable. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
38 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
ADMIN UPDATE #1: 2017-OCT-03; AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06 
7.3.6.7 Planning technique 
 
Both the inverse and forward planning is permitted and the dose calculation grid should be less 
than 0.25 cm. 
 
7.3.6.8 Treatment Delivery Constraints 
 
Due to the different techniques used, no specific treatment time and segment size constraints will 
be listed here. 
 
7.3.7 
Verification 
 
7.3.7.1 Position Verification/Correction 
 
The method and frequency of verification/correction imaging must be documented, and adhered to 
according to departmental protocol. For example: state the imaging method (i.e. cone-beam CT), 
positional tolerance, method of positional correction (for example, couch with 6 degrees of 
freedom) and frequency of imaging method for fractionated  SRS. 
 
7.3.7.2 Dose Verification 
 
The dose must be independently verified when feasible. For all SRS cases, follow departmental 
protocol where an independent monitor unit check and/or pre-treatment verification measurement 
using films/chambers/diodes/arrays may be conducted. 
 
7.3.8 
Concurrent Therapy 
 
7.3.8.1 Dabrafenib and trametinib will start a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 14 days prior to 
radiation therapy and continue through the days that radiation is given. 
 
7.3.8.2 Scheduling: dabrafenib and trametinib dose should be given at least 1 hour prior to radiation 
treatment. 
 
7.3.9 
Patient Specific Documentation Requirements  
 
7.3.9.1 Volumes 
 
The volume of all GTV, PTV, OAR as well as any overlapping PTV-OAR volume are to be 
documented. All GTVs to be displayed on the planning CT. Orthogonal images through the 
isocenter of all GTVs are to be documented. 
 
7.3.9.2 Dose Summary Statistics 
 
Treatment time: the monitor units or time required to deliver the prescribed dose will be calculated 
and reported. 
 
Dose Uniformity: the maximum and minimum dose for each target (GTV and/or PTV) will be 
calculated and reported. 
 
The PITV is defined as the ratio of the prescription isodose volume to the target volume. These will 
be calculated and reported. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
39 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Prescription isodose line: The total dose delivered to the prescription isodose line shall be 
calculated and reported. 
 
Normal tissue and critical OAR dose points: Documentation of the point maximum dose (highest 
point dose) within the critical OAR are to be calculated and reported. 
 
7.3.9.3 Dose Distributions 
 
The isodose distribution for each target must be submitted. Isodose distributions should be 
displayed on three orthogonal planes, or if not possible, on multiple axial through each target 
volume. 
 
7.3.9.4 Dose Volume Histogram (DVHs) 
 
DVH for each GTV and/or PTV and OAR must be documented. DVHs must be in absolute dose 
(Gy). For fractionated SRS IMRT or VMAT treatment plans, DVH data should also include 
unspecified tissue. 
 
7.3.9.4.1 Specification of DVH Calculation - Differential or cumulative (if relevant) 
Cumulative. 
 
7.3.9.4.2 Dose Bin Size (if relevant) 
Less than 0.25cm x 0.25cm x 0.25cm. 
 
7.3.9.4.3 Graphical or Tabular (if relevant) 
Both are relevant to be calculated and submitted. Tabular data should be submitted with bin-size 
set to < 10 cGy. 
 
7.3.10 Quality Assurance Review Criteria 
 
Treatment related deviations outside protocol recommendations for dosimetry will be reported as 
minor or major protocol deviations. Such deviations could include failure to identify and treat 
appropriate targets and excessive treatment of non-target tissues (see Radiotherapy Quality 
Assurance Manual). 
 
7.3.11 Credentialing Requirements  
 
All centres participating in the study will require credentialing for the delivery of SRS (single and 
fractionated) prior to local activation. This credentialing will consist of a Facility Questionnaire 
and demonstration of the ability to comply with protocol specifications for treatment planning and 
delivery using anonymized archival data (dry runs). 
 
Credentialing will be mandated at the investigator level and the site must receive approval from the 
central QA Reviewer before local activation. 
 
All required credentialing documents must be uploaded to a secure website created specifically to 
facilitate radiotherapy QA review for this trial. 
 
Please review the Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Manual for more details about documents to be 
submitted, the Facility Questionnaire, timing of the reviews and procedures for documentation 
uploading. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
40 
CONFIDENTIAL 
7.3.12 Centre Based Pre-Treatment Review 
 
The treatment plans will be reviewed for every patient registered on the study. This review will be 
performed prior to the commencement of radiotherapy by another physician designated for this 
purpose and identified as study participant, i.e. “local QA reviewer”. The following will be 
reviewed: contoured volumes, dose summary statistics, dose distributions, and DVHs. 
Specifications for the review are included in the Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Manual. There 
will be no external real-time review for this study. 
 
7.3.13 External Post-Treatment Review  
 
A final review will be completed for all patients after all radiotherapy has been completed and the 
required documents submitted (see Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Manual). 
 
7.3.14  Criteria for Retreatment with SRS for New Lesions 
 
In the event on follow-up that distant brain failure arises (new lesion) then further SRS alone is 
encouraged as long as the radiation oncologist deems it suitable. Typically, if up to 10 new 
metastases occur then every effort should be made to treat with SRS alone. In the case of 
leptomeningeal disease then WBRT is advocated, otherwise the intent is to spare the patient from 
WBRT at relapse if suitable for SRS. 
 
7.3.15  Management of Patients with Possible Radiation Necrosis 
 
If the treated lesion changes in such a way that radiation necrosis is suspected then follow-up scans 
are required. If no further growth or regression is observed then the response assessment should be 
stable disease rather than progressive disease. If a patient has surgery and pathology indicates 
radiation necrosis then this should be noted in the response assessment. 
 
7.3.16 Glossary 
 
AAPM -  The American Association of Physicists in Medicine 
ASTRO - American Society for Radiation Oncology  
CT -  
Computed Tomography 
CTV -  
Clinical Target Volume 
DVH - 
Dose Volume Histogram  
GTV - 
Gross Tumour Volume 
IMRT - Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy 
MLC - 
Multi-leaf Collimators  
MRI - 
Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
OAR - 
Organs at Risk 
QA - 
Quality Assurance 
PTV - 
Planning Target Volume 
SRS - 
Stereotactic Radiosurgery 
VMAT - Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
41 
CONFIDENTIAL 
7.4 
Duration of Protocol Treatment 
 
Treatment will continue until the criteria for removal from protocol treatment have been met (see 
section 10.0). 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
42 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AMEND #1: 2018-APR-06 
8.0 
CRITERIA FOR MEASUREMENT OF STUDY ENDPOINTS 
 
8.1 
Definitions 
 
Response Assessments: The following algorithms will be used to support primary and secondary 
efficacy endpoints in the present trial. 
 
CNS Assessments: For efficacy assessment in the CNS to support the primary endpoint of 
intracranial response, a protocol defined RECIST 1.1-based approach will be utilized with 
modifications that reflect the approach of the RANO-BM Working Group. RECIST 1.1, 
uni-dimensional longest diameter (LD) measurements will be used with a lower limit of size for 
defining a measurable lesion, > 1 cm based on the baseline MRI of brain. CNS lesions < 1 cm are 
non-target lesions. Best overall CNS response represents a composite of radiographic CNS target 
and non-target response (see definitions below), corticosteroid use, and clinical status. 
 
Extracranial Disease Assessments: Assessment of response of extracranial disease will use 
RECIST 1.1. 
 
Overall Response Assessments: Overall response assessment will be assessed using RECIST 1.1. 
Overall response will be measured as the sum of the LD of CNS + extracranial index lesions. The 
size cut-off of a measurable lesion in the extracranial compartment will follow the RECIST 1.1 
definition of 1.0 cm. 
 
8.1.1 
Evaluable for adverse events. All patients will be evaluable for adverse event evaluation from the 
time of their first treatment. 
 
8.1.2 
Evaluable for response. All patients who have received at least one cycle of therapy and have their 
disease re-evaluated will be considered evaluable for response (exceptions will be those who 
exhibit objective disease progression prior to the end of cycle 1 who will also be considered 
evaluable). Patients on therapy for at least this period and who meet the other listed criteria will 
have their response classified according to the definitions set out below [Eisenhauer 2009]. 
 
8.2 
Response and Evaluation Endpoints 
 
Response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the revised international criteria 
(1.1) proposed by the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) committee with 
modifications proposed by RANO to reflect intracranial, extracranial and overall objective 
response rate. 
 
8.2.1 
Measurable Disease. Measurable tumour lesions are defined as those that can be accurately 
measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as > 20 mm with chest x-ray 
and as > 10 mm with CT scan or clinical examination. Bone lesions are considered measurable only 
if assessed by CT scan and have an identifiable soft tissue component that meets these requirements 
(soft tissue component > 10 mm by CT scan). Malignant lymph nodes must be ≥ 15mm in the short 
axis to be considered measurable; only the short axis will be measured and followed. All tumour 
measurements must be recorded in millimetres (or decimal fractions of centimetres). Previously 
irradiated lesions are not considered measurable unless progression has been documented in the 
lesion. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
43 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8.2.2 
Non-measurable Disease. All other lesions (or sites of disease), including small lesions are 
considered non-measurable disease. Bone lesions without a measurable soft tissue component, 
leptomeningeal disease, ascites, pleural/pericardial effusions, lymphangitis cutis/pulmonis, 
inflammatory breast disease, lymphangitic involvement of lung or skin and abdominal masses 
followed by clinical examination are all non-measurable. Lesions in previously irradiated areas are 
non-measurable, unless progression has been demonstrated. 
 
8.2.3 
Target Lesions. When more than one measurable tumour lesion is present at baseline all lesions up 
to a maximum of 5 lesions total (and a maximum of 2 lesions per organ) representative of all 
involved organs should be identified as target lesions and will be recorded and measured at baseline. 
Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter), be 
representative of all involved organs, but in addition should be those that lend themselves to 
reproducible repeated measurements. Note that pathological nodes must meet the criterion of a 
short axis of ≥ 15 mm by CT scan and only the short axis of these nodes will contribute to the 
baseline sum. All other pathological nodes (those with short axis ≥ 10 mm but <15 mm) should be 
considered non-target lesions. Nodes that have a short axis < 10 mm are considered non-
pathological and should not be recorded or followed (see 10.2.4). At baseline, the sum of the target 
lesions (longest diameter of tumour lesions plus short axis of lymph nodes: overall maximum of 5) 
is to be recorded. 
 
After baseline, a value should be provided on the CRF for all identified target lesions for each 
assessment, even if very small. If extremely small and faint lesions cannot be accurately measured 
but are deemed to be present, a default value of 5 mm may be used. If lesions are too small to 
measure and indeed are believed to be absent, a default value of 0 mm may be used. 
 
8.2.4 
Non-target Lesions. All non-measurable lesions (or sites of disease) plus any measurable lesions 
over and above those listed as target lesions are considered non-target lesions. Measurements are 
not required but these lesions should be noted at baseline and should be followed as “present” or 
“absent”. 
 
8.2.5 
Response. 
 
All patients will have their BEST RESPONSE from the start of study treatment until the end of 
treatment classified as outlined below: 
 
Complete Response (CR): disappearance of target and non-target lesions. Pathological lymph 
nodes must have short axis measures < 10mm (Note: continue to record the measurement even if 
< 10mm and considered CR). Residual lesions (other than nodes < 10mm) thought to be non-
malignant should be further investigated (by cytology specialized imaging or other techniques as 
appropriate for individual cases [ref RECIST 1.1]) before CR can be accepted. Confirmation of 
response is required in non-randomized studies. 
 
Partial Response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumour 
lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of 
diameters. Non target lesions must be non-PD. Confirmation of response is required in non-
randomized studies. 
 
Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify 
for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
44 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Progressive Disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions 
taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) AND an 
absolute increase of ≥ 5mm. Appearance of new lesions will also constitute progressive disease 
(including lesions in previously unassessed areas). In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal 
progression of non-target disease may be accepted as evidence of disease progression, where the 
overall tumour burden has increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of treatment or where the 
tumour burden appears to have increased by at least 73% in volume. Modest increases in the size 
of one or more non-target lesions are NOT considered unequivocal progression. If the evidence of 
PD is equivocal (target or non-target), treatment may continue until the next assessment, but if 
confirmed, the earlier date must be used. 
 
A single CNS lesion must increase by an absolute value of > 5 mm to be considered progression. 
 
Radiation Necrosis versus Progressive Disease: Progression is not unequivocal if change in 
imaging is possibly due to radiation necrosis. If the treated lesion changes in such a way that 
radiation necrosis is suspected then follow-up scans are required. If no further growth or regression 
is observed then the response assessment should be stable disease rather than progressive disease. 
If a patient has surgery and pathology indicates radiation necrosis then this should be noted in the 
response assessment. For SRS treated lesions, an advanced imaging modality such as perfusion 
MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, or 18FLT or 18FDG positron emission tomography (PET) may be 
used as additional evidence of tumor progression or treatment effect/radionecrosis. 
 
Corticosteroid Use and Clinical Deterioration: 
a. An increase in corticosteroid dose alone, in the absence of clinical deterioration related to 
tumour, will not be used as a sole determinant of progression. Patients with stable imaging 
studies whose corticosteroid dose was increased for reasons other than clinical deterioration 
related to tumour do not qualify for stable disease or progression. They should be observed 
closely. If their corticosteroid dose can be reduced back to baseline, they will be considered as 
having stable disease; if further clinical deterioration related to tumour becomes apparent, they 
will be considered to have progression. 
b. The definition of clinical deterioration is left to the discretion of the treating physician, but it 
is recommended that a decline in the KPS from 100 or 90 to 70 or less, a decline in KPS of at 
least 20 points from 80 or less, or a decline in KPS from any baseline to 50 or less, for at least 
7 days, be considered neurologic deterioration unless attributable to comorbid events, 
treatment-related toxicity, or changes in corticosteroid dose. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
45 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Table 1: Integration of Target, non-Target and New Lesions into Response Assessment: 
 
Target Lesions 
Non-Target Lesions 
New 
Lesions 
Overall 
Response 
Best Response for this  
Category also Requires 
Target lesions ± non target lesions 
CR 
CR 
No 
CR 
tumour nodes <10mm 
CR 
Non-CR/Non-PD 
No 
PR 
 
CR 
Not all evaluated 
No 
PR 
PR 
Non-PD/ not all 
evaluated 
No 
PR 
SD 
Non-PD/ not all 
evaluated 
No 
SD 
documented at least once ≥ 4 wks. 
from baseline  
Not all evaluated 
Non-PD 
No 
NE 
 
PD 
Any 
Any 
PD 
 
Any 
PD 
Any 
PD 
 
Any 
Any 
Yes 
PD 
 
Non target lesions ONLY 
No Target 
CR 
No 
CR 
tumour nodes < 10mm 
No Target 
Non-CR/non-PD 
No 
Non-
CR/non-
PD 
 
No Target 
Not all evaluated 
No 
NE 
 
No Target 
Unequivocal PD 
Any 
PD 
 
No Target 
Any 
Yes 
PD 
 
Note:  Patients with a global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective 
evidence of disease progression at that time should be reported as “symptomatic deterioration”. This is a reason 
for stopping therapy, but is NOT objective PD. Every effort should be made to document the objective progression 
even after discontinuation of treatment. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
46 
CONFIDENTIAL 
For non-randomized trials, where confirmation of response is required, best overall response can 
be interpreted as follows: 
 
Response:  
First Time Point 
Subsequent  
Time Point 
BEST Overall Response 
Also Requires 
CR 
CR 
CR 
tumour nodes < 10mm 
CR 
PR 
SD, PD or PR (see comment*) 
 
CR 
SD 
SD provided minimum criteria for 
SD duration met, otherwise, PD 
 
CR 
PD 
SD provided minimum criteria for 
SD duration met, otherwise, PD 
 
CR 
NE 
SD provided minimum criteria for 
SD duration met, otherwise NE 
 
PR 
CR 
PR 
 
PR 
PR 
PR 
 
PR 
SD 
SD 
 
PR 
PD 
SD provided minimum criteria for 
SD duration met, otherwise, PD 
 
PR 
NE 
SD provided minimum criteria for 
SD duration met, otherwise NE 
 
NE 
NE 
NE 
 
*  
may consider PR providing initial “CR” likely PR on subsequent review – then original CR should be corrected. 
Recurrence of lesion after true CR is PD. 
 
Because CNS progression of disease may be masked by corticosteroids or manifest by neurological 
deterioration without radiological progression, the following ADDITIONAL parameters will be 
used:  
 
Response Criteria for CNS Metastases 
 
Criterion 
CR 
PR 
SD 
PD 
Target lesions 
None 
≥ 30% decrease in sum 
LD relative to baseline 
< 30% decrease 
relative to baseline but 
< 20% increase in sum 
LD relative to nadir 
≥ 20% increase in sum 
LD relative to nadir* 
Non-target lesions None 
Stable or improved 
Stable or improved 
Unequivocal PD* 
New lesion(s)** 
None 
None 
None 
Present* 
Corticosteroids 
None 
Stable or decreased 
Stable or decreased 
NA+ 
Clinical status 
Stable or 
improved Stable or improved 
Stable or improved 
Worse* 
Requirement for 
response 
All 
All 
All 
Any+ 
* 
Progression occurs when this criterion is met. 
** New lesion = new lesion not present on prior scans and visible in at least 2 projections. If a new lesion is equivocal, 
for example because of its small size, continued therapy may be considered, and follow up evaluation will clarify if it 
represents truly new disease. If repeat scans confirm there is definitely a new lesion, then progression should be 
declared using the date of the initial scan showing the new lesion. For immunotherapy-based approaches, new 
lesions alone to do not define progression (See “Guidance in the case of new lesion(s) while on immunotherapy”). 
+ 
Increase in corticosteroids alone will not be taken into account in determining progression in the absence of persistent 
clinical deterioration. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
47 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8.3 
Response Duration 
 
Response duration will be measured from the time measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever is 
first recorded) are first met until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively 
documented, taking as reference the smallest measurements recorded on study (including baseline). 
 
8.4 
Stable Disease Duration 
 
Stable disease duration will be measured from the time of start of treatment until the criteria for 
progression are met, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline). 
 
8.5 
Methods of Measurement 
 
The same method of assessment and the same technique should be used to characterize each 
identified and reported lesion at baseline and during follow-up. Assessments should be identified 
on a calendar schedule and should not be affected by delays in therapy. While on study, all lesions 
recorded at baseline should have their actual measurements recorded at each subsequent evaluation, 
even when very small (e.g. 2 mm). If it is the opinion of the radiologist that the lesion has likely 
disappeared, the measurement should be recorded as 0 mm. If the lesion is believed to be present 
and is faintly seen but too small to measure, a default value of 5 mm should be assigned. For lesions 
which fragment/split add together the longest diameters of the fragmented portions; for lesions 
which coalesce, measure the maximal longest diameter for the “merged lesion”. 
 
8.5.1 
Clinical Lesions. Clinical lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial and 
≥ 10mm as assessed using calipers (e.g. skin nodules). For the case of skin lesions, documentation 
by colour photography including a ruler to estimate the size of the lesion is recommended. If 
feasible, imaging is preferred. 
 
8.5.2 
Chest X-ray. Chest CT is preferred over chest X-ray, particularly when progression is an important 
endpoint, since CT is more sensitive than X-ray, particularly in identifying new lesions. However, 
lesions > 20 mm on chest X-ray may be considered measurable if they are clearly defined and 
surrounded by aerated lung. 
 
8.5.3 
CT, MRI. CT is the best currently available and reproducible method to measure lesions selected 
for response assessment in the body while MRI is best modality for the CNS. This guideline has 
defined measurability of lesions on CT or MRI scan based on the assumption that slice thickness 
is 5 mm or less. When scans have slice thickness greater than 5 mm, the minimum size for a 
measurable lesion should be twice the slice thickness. Other specialized imaging or other 
techniques may also be appropriate for individual case [ref RECIST 1.1]. For example, while PET 
scans are not considered adequate to measure lesions, PET-CT scans may be used providing that 
the measures are obtained from the CT scan and the CT scan is of identical diagnostic quality to a 
diagnostic CT (with IV and oral contrast). 
 
8.5.4 
Ultrasound. Ultrasound is not useful in assessment of lesion size and should not be used as a method 
of measurement. If new lesions are identified by ultrasound in the course of the study, confirmation 
by CT is advised. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
48 
CONFIDENTIAL 
8.5.5 
Endoscopy, Laparoscopy. The utilization of these techniques for objective tumour evaluation is not 
advised. However, they can be useful to confirm complete pathological response when biopsies are 
obtained or to determine relapse in trials where recurrence following complete response or surgical 
resection is an endpoint. 
 
8.5.6 
Cytology, Histology. These techniques can be used to differentiate between PR and CR in rare cases 
if required by protocol (for example, residual lesions in tumour types such as germ cell tumours, 
where known residual benign tumours can remain). When effusions are known to be a potential 
adverse effect of treatment (e.g. with certain taxane compounds or angiogenesis inhibitors), the 
cytological confirmation of the neoplastic origin of any effusion that appears or worsens during 
treatment when the measurable tumour has met criteria for response or stable disease is advised to 
differentiate between response or stable disease and progressive disease. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
49 
CONFIDENTIAL 
9.0 
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING 
 
This protocol does not contain investigational agent(s), and adverse events occurring as a result of 
this commercially available treatment should be reported to CCTG in the manner described below. 
In addition, your local Research Ethics Board (REB) should be notified. 
 
The descriptions and grading scales found in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse 
Events (CTCAE) will be utilized for Adverse Event (AE) reporting (version can be found in 
Appendix V). All appropriate treatment areas should have access to a copy of the CTCAE. A copy 
of the CTCAE can be downloaded from the CTEP web site: 
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. 
 
All serious adverse events (SAE) defined as per ICH guidelines (see below) and other adverse 
events must be recorded on case report forms. In addition, all “reportable” serious adverse events 
are subject to expedited reporting using the CCTG SAE form. The term ‘reportable SAE’ is used 
in the definitions which follow to describe those SAEs which are subject to expedited reporting to 
CCTG. 
 
9.1 
Definition of a Reportable Serious Adverse Event 
 
• 
All serious adverse events which are unexpected and related to protocol treatment must be 
reported in an expedited manner (see Section 9.2 for reporting instructions). These include 
events occurring during the treatment period (until 30 days after last protocol treatment 
administration) and at any time afterwards. 
• 
Unexpected adverse events are those which are not consistent in either nature or severity with 
information contained in the investigator brochure or product monograph. 
• 
Adverse events considered related to protocol treatment are those for which a relationship to 
the protocol agent cannot reasonably be ruled out. 
• 
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any adverse event that at any dose: 
− 
results in death 
− 
is life-threatening 
− 
requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization (excluding 
hospital admissions for study drug administration, transfusional support, scheduled 
elective surgery and admissions for palliative or terminal care) 
− 
results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity 
− 
is a congenital anomaly/birth defect 
• 
Any new primary cancers and treatment emergent malignancies (including squamous cell 
carcinoma and new primary melanoma) with the exception of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). 
BCC should be reported as an AE or SAE based on the discretion of the investigator. 
• 
Symptomatic LVEF decrease that meets stopping criteria or asymptomatic LVEF decrease that 
does not recover, as outlined as LVEF guidance (Section 7.1.3 Table 2) 
• 
Retinal pigment epithelial detachment (RPED) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) 
 
Medical and scientific judgment should be exercised in deciding whether expedited reporting is 
appropriate in other situations such as important medical events that may not be immediately life-
threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the patient or may require 
intervention to prevent one of the events listed above. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
50 
CONFIDENTIAL 
9.2 
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Instructions 
 
All reportable serious adverse events must be reported using a web-based Electronic Data Capture 
(EDC) system being used for this trial. For details about accessing the EDC system and completing 
the on-line SAE report form, please refer to the CCTG Generic Data Management Guidebook for 
EDC Studies posted on the IND.224 section of the CCTG website (www.ctg.queensu.ca). 
 
Within 24 hours: 
Complete preliminary Serious Adverse Event Report and submit to CCTG 
via EDC system. 
 
Within 7 days: 
Update Serious Adverse Event Report as much as possible and submit 
report to CCTG via EDC system. 
 
EDC SAE web application interruption: 
In the rare event that internet connectivity to the EDC SAE system is disrupted, please print and 
complete a paper copy of the SAE Report, available from the trial specific website. 
 
FAX paper SAE Report to: 
 
IND.224 Study Coordinator 
Canadian Cancer Trials Group 
Fax No.: 613-533-2411 
 
Please use the same timelines for submission as for direct EDC reporting. 
 
Once internet connectivity is restored, the information that was FAXED to CCTG on the paper 
SAE Report must also be entered by the site into the EDC SAE web application. 
 
Local internet interruption: 
If you are unable to access the EDC SAE system, and cannot access a paper copy of the SAE Report 
from the trial website, please phone the IND.224 trial team (613-533-6430) to obtain a copy of the 
SAE Report by FAX. Once completed, the report must be FAXED back to CCTG as indicated 
above. Once internet connectivity is restored, the information that was FAXED to CCTG on the 
paper SAE Report must also be entered by the site into the EDC SAE web application. 
 
In cases of prolonged internet interruptions, please contact the CCTG Safety Desk for further 
instructions (613-533-6430). 
 
9.3 
Other Protocol Reportable Events – Exposure Reporting, and Pregnancy Reporting 
 
9.3.1 
Pregnancy Prevention 
 
Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) and males who are enrolled in the trial must have 
agreed to use contraceptive method(s) as described in Eligibility Criteria 4.2.13. Investigators may 
wish to additionally advise the female partners of male participants about pregnancy prevention 
guidelines when appropriate and compliant with local policy. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
51 
CONFIDENTIAL 
9.3.2 
Pregnancy Reporting 
 
The investigator is required to report to CCTG any pregnancy occurring in female participants, and 
female partners of male participants. Pregnancies occurring up to 4 months after the completion of 
study treatment must also be reported. 
 
The investigator should report the pregnancy in a timely manner, within 24 hours of learning of the 
pregnancy using the CCTG Pregnancy Reporting Form available from the trial webpage. 
 
Once informed consent has been obtained, the form should be updated to provide further pregnancy 
information and to reflect the outcome of the pregnancy. All follow-up reports must be submitted 
to CCTG in a timely manner. For pregnant partner of trial participant (and pregnant participants, if 
required by local policy), a copy of the signed signature page of the pregnancy follow-up consent 
must be submitted to CCTG. 
 
Documents outlined above (including updates) must be sent to the CCTG safety desk (613-533-
2812/ safety-desk@ctg.queensu.ca). 
 
If the pregnancy results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or 
prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is 
a congenital anomaly/birth defect, then an SAE report must be additionally submitted as described 
above. Please note, hospitalization for labour/delivery alone does not constitute an ‘inpatient 
hospitalization’ for the purposes of pregnancy reporting. 
 
9.3.3 
Exposure Reporting (Non-study Participants) 
 
The investigator is required to report to CCTG any incidence of exposure to study agent(s). 
Exposure is defined as significant, direct, contact/inhalation/consumption of agent(s) by non- study 
participant (an individual who is not otherwise participating in this clinical trial). An example of 
an exposure includes a non-study participant swallowing study medication. The investigator is 
responsible for determining significance, based on the agent to which the individual is exposed. 
 
The investigator should report the exposure in a timely manner, within 24 hours of learning of the 
exposure, using the CCTG Exposure Reporting Form available from the trial webpage. 
 
Once informed consent has been obtained, the form should be updated to provide further exposure 
information and to reflect the outcome of the exposure as the information becomes available upon 
appropriate follow-up of the exposed individual. All follow-up reports must be submitted to CCTG 
in a timely manner. A copy of the signed exposure follow-up consent signature page must also be 
submitted to CCTG. 
 
Documents outlined above (including updates) must be sent to the CCTG safety desk (613-533-
2812/ safety-desk@ctg.queensu.ca). 
 
If the exposure results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation 
of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital 
anomaly/birth defect, then an SAE report must be additionally submitted as described above. 
 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
52 
CONFIDENTIAL 
9.4 
CCTG Responsibility for Reporting Serious Adverse Events to Health Canada 
 
The CCTG will provide expedited reports of SAEs to Health Canada for those events which meet 
regulatory requirements for expedited reporting, i.e. events which are BOTH serious AND 
unexpected, AND which are thought to be related to protocol treatment (or for which a causal 
relationship with protocol treatment cannot be ruled out). 
 
9.5 
CCTG Reporting Responsibility to Novartis 
 
Novartis will be notified of all protocol reportable serious adverse events within 1 working day. 
 
9.6 
Novartis Reporting Responsibilities 
 
Novartis will report all regulatory reportable serious adverse events from non-CCTG trials (Safety 
Updates) to Health Canada and also provide to CCTG within the timelines outlined in the contract. 
CCTG will review these events to determine which meet the criteria (serious, unexpected, drug 
related) for IND.224 investigator distribution.  
 
9.7 
Reporting Safety Reports to Investigators 
 
CCTG will notify Investigators of all Safety Reports (Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) from this 
trial and Safety Updates (SUs) from other clinical trials) that are reportable to regulatory authorities 
in Canada as reported to the CCTG. This includes all serious events that are unexpected and related 
(i.e. possibly, probably, or definitely) to protocol treatment. The reports will be posted to the CCTG 
trial IND.224 web-based safety monitoring utility. 
 
Investigators must notify their Research Ethics Boards (REBs) of events which involve corrective 
action(s) to be taken as a result of the event(s) such as protocol and/or informed consent changes. 
The date of REB Submission for these SAEs and SUs will need to be entered into the CCTG trial 
IND.224 web based safety monitoring utility and documentation of REB submission must be 
retained in the study binder on site. The REB submission template provided by CCTG can be used 
to assist with tracking, submission, filing and monitoring. 
 
The submission of events to your ethics board should be done as soon as possible (we suggest 
within 30 days). REB submissions greater than 90 days from the date of notification will be 
regarded as delinquent and a major deficiency will be assigned. These safety reports are to be filed 
in the trial files on site. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
53 
CONFIDENTIAL 
10.0 
PROTOCOL TREATMENT DISCONTINUATION AND THERAPY AFTER STOPPING 
 
10.1 
Criteria for Discontinuing Protocol Treatment 
 
Patients may stop protocol treatment in the following instances: 
• 
Intercurrent illness which would, in the judgement of the investigator, affect assessments of 
clinical status to a significant degree, and require discontinuation of protocol therapy. 
• 
Unacceptable toxicity as defined in Section 7.0. 
• 
Tumour progression or disease recurrence as defined in Section 8.0. 
• 
Request by the patient. 
• 
Efforts should be made to maintain the investigations schedule and continue follow-up, even if 
patients discontinue protocol treatment prematurely and/or no longer attend the participating 
institution. 
 
10.2 
Therapy After Protocol Treatment is Stopped 
 
At the discretion of the investigator. 
 
Note, patients with CNS progression that can be managed with additional SRS or whole brain 
radiotherapy can continue on dabrafeinib and trametinib if there is no evidence of progression 
outside of the CNS and it is felt that continuation of systemic treatment may benefit the patient. 
 
10.3 
Follow-up Off Protocol Treatment 
 
All patients will be seen at 4 weeks after completion of protocol therapy. Thereafter, continued 
follow-up is not required for patients who go off protocol treatment with progressive disease, except 
to document ongoing toxicities (until resolved to < grade 2) and late toxicities (including second 
malignancies). For patients who go off protocol treatment with CR, PR, or SD ongoing, follow-up 
will be required every 3 months until relapse. Final report (Death Report) will be required on all 
patients. Due within 2 weeks of knowledge of death (see Appendix III - Documentation for Study). 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
54 
CONFIDENTIAL 
11.0 
CENTRAL REVIEW PROCEDURES AND TISSUE COLLECTION 
 
11.1 
Central Radiology Review 
 
At the conclusion of the trial, a central review of x-rays and/or scans will be carried out if any 
responses have been claimed. For purposes of reporting, the results of both local and central 
radiology reviews will be included. 
 
11.2 
Central Pathology Review 
 
There will be no central pathology review for this study. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
55 
CONFIDENTIAL 
12.0 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
 
12.1 
Objectives and Design 
 
The primary objective is to determine the intracranial objective response rate to concurrent 
dabrafenib and trametinib with stereotactic radiation in patients with BRAF mutation-positive 
malignant melanoma and brain metastases. There will be two cohorts based on the numbers of CNS 
metastases. Secondary endpoints include: 
• 
Extra-cranial objective response rate and overall ORR. 
• 
Duration of response. 
• 
Intracranial and overall progression free survival. 
• 
Overall survival. 
• 
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the regimen using the CTCAE v.4. 
 
12.2 
Primary Endpoints and Analysis 
 
The primary endpoint is objective response rate in the brain. Based on the literature objective 
response rate is not influenced by the numbers of metastases that are treated by SRS [Follwell 2012]. 
However, toxicity may be different based on numbers of metastases treated. For this reason, 
patients will be evaluated for ORR; however, toxicity will be evaluated for two cohorts: those with 
1-4 lesions and those with 5-10 lesions. Response will be assessed using RECIST v1.1. Results 
between cohorts will only be compared descriptively with one another and with previously 
published data. There will be an interim safety analysis for both radiation cohorts after 5 patients 
in each cohort have completed SRS with 4 weeks of follow-up time. 
 
12.3 
Sample Size and Duration of Study 
 
We propose to target a 20% increase in intracranial ORR based on a baseline of 40% for SRS or 
dabrafenib alone [Follwell 2012; Liew 2011; Neal 2014; Sueng 1998] versus 60% ORR with the 
combination [Long 2016] difference with alpha and beta = 0.10. With a Simon two stage design there 
would be > 7 responses/18 patients in the first stage and 22/46 in the second stage. Assuming 10% 
inevaluable patients or dropouts, we propose a maximum of 50 patients. 
 
We propose to evaluate secondary endpoints of safety and intracranial PFS in the two previously 
defined cohorts 1-4 and greater than 5-10 and to having at least 20-25 patients/cohort for these 
endpoints. 
 
With accrual of 4-5 patients/month the accrual duration will take an estimated 12-18 months with 
an additional 6 months of follow-up to assess objective responses. 
 
12.4 
Safety Monitoring 
 
Adverse events will be monitored on an ongoing basis by the central office and their frequencies 
reported bi-annually at investigators’ meetings. 
 
12.5 
Interim Analysis 
 
An interim assessment for safety of the first 5 patients treated within each cohort is planned. Results 
will be reviewed by the trial study team to determine if toxicity is acceptable to proceed. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
56 
CONFIDENTIAL 
13.0 
PUBLICATION POLICY 
 
13.1 
Authorship of Papers, Meeting Abstracts, Etc. 
 
13.1.1 The results of this study will be published. Prior to trial activation, the chair will decide whether to 
publish the trial under a group title, or with naming of individual authors. If the latter approach is 
taken, the following rules will apply: 
• 
The first author will generally be the chair of the study. 
• 
A limited number of the members of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group and Novartis, may be 
credited as authors depending upon their level of involvement in the study. 
• 
Additional authors, up to a maximum of 15, will be those who have made the most significant 
contribution to the overall success of the study. This contribution will be assessed, in part but 
not entirely, in terms of patients enrolled and will be reviewed at the end of the trial by the 
study chair. 
 
13.1.2 In an appropriate footnote, or at the end of the article, the following statement will be made: 
 
"A study coordinated by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group. Participating 
investigators included: (a list of the individuals who have contributed 
patients and their institutions)." 
 
13.2 
Responsibility for Publication 
 
It will be the responsibility of the Study Chair to write up the results of the study within a reasonable 
time of its completion. If after a period of six months following study closure the manuscript has 
not been submitted, the central office reserves the right to make other arrangements to ensure timely 
publication. 
 
Dissemination of Trial Results 
CCTG will inform participating investigators of the primary publication of this trial. The complete 
journal reference and, if where publicly available, the direct link to the article will be posted on the 
Clinical Trial Results public site of the CCTG website: http://www.ctg.queensu.ca. 
 
13.3 
Submission of Material for Presentation or Publication 
 
Material may not be submitted for presentation or publication without prior review by Novartis, 
the CCTG Senior Investigator, Senior Biostatistician, Study Coordinator, and approval of the Study 
Chair. Individual participating centres may not present outcome results from their own centres 
separately. Supporting groups and agencies will be acknowledged. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
57 
CONFIDENTIAL 
14.0 
ETHICAL, REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES 
 
14.1 
Regulatory Considerations 
 
All institutions in Canada must conduct this trial in accordance with International Conference on 
Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) Guidelines. 
 
14.2 
Inclusivity in Research 
 
CCTG does not exclude individuals from participation in clinical trials on the basis of attributes 
such as culture, religion, race, national or ethnic origin, colour, mental or physical disability (except 
incapacity), sexual orientation, sex/gender, occupation, ethnicity, income, or criminal record, 
unless there is a valid reason (i.e. safety) for the exclusion. 
 
In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS), it is 
the policy of CCTG that vulnerable persons or groups will not be automatically excluded from a 
clinical trial (except for incompetent persons) if participation in the trial may benefit the patient or 
a group to which the person belongs. 
 
However, extra protections may be necessary for vulnerable persons or groups. It is the 
responsibility of the local investigator and research ethics board (REB) to ensure that appropriate 
mechanisms are in place to protect vulnerable persons/groups. In accordance with TCPS, 
researchers and REBs should provide special protections for those who are vulnerable to abuse, 
exploitation or discrimination. As vulnerable populations may be susceptible to coercion or undue 
influence, it is especially important that informed consent be obtained appropriately. 
 
Centres are expected to ensure compliance with local REB or institutional policy regarding 
participation of vulnerable persons/groups. For example, if a vulnerable person/group would be 
eligible for participation in a CCTG clinical trial under this policy but excluded by local policy, it 
is expected that they would not be enrolled in the trial. It is the centre’s responsibility to ensure 
compliance with all local SOPs. 
 
It is CCTG’s policy that persons who cannot give informed consent (i.e. mentally incompetent 
persons, or those physically incapacitated such as comatose persons) are not to be recruited into 
CCTG studies. It is the responsibility of the local investigator to determine the subject’s 
competency, in accordance with applicable local policies and in conjunction with the local REB (if 
applicable). 
 
Subjects who were competent at the time of enrolment in the clinical trial but become incompetent 
during their participation do not automatically have to be removed from the study. When re-consent 
of the patient is required, investigators must follow applicable local policies when determining if it 
is acceptable for a substitute decision maker to be used. CCTG will accept re-consent from a 
substitute decision maker. If this patient subsequently regains capacity, the patient should be re-
consented as a condition of continuing participation. 
 
14.3 
Obtaining Informed Consent 
 
It is expected that consent will be appropriately obtained for each participant/potential participant 
in an CCTG trial, in accordance with ICH-GCP section 4.8. The centre is responsible for ensuring 
that all local policies are followed. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
58 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Additionally, in accordance with GCP 4.8.2, CCTG may require that participants/potential 
participants be informed of any new information may impact a participant’s/potential participant’s 
willingness to participate in the study. 
 
Based upon applicable guidelines and regulations (Declaration of Helsinki, ICH-GCP), a 
participating investigator (as defined on the participants list) is ultimately responsible, in terms of 
liability and compliance, for ensuring informed consent has been appropriately obtained. CCTG 
recognizes that in many centres other personnel (as designated on the participants list) also play an 
important role in this process. In accordance with GCP 4.8.5, it is acceptable for the Qualified 
Investigator to delegate the responsibility for conducting the consent discussion. 
 
CCTG requires that each participant sign a consent form prior to their enrollment in the study to 
document his/her willingness to take part. CCTG may also require, as indicated above, that 
participants/potential participants be informed of new information if it becomes available during 
the course of the study. In conjunction with GCP 4.8.2, the communication of this information 
should be documented. 
 
CCTG allows the use of translators in obtaining informed consent. Provision of translators is the 
responsibility of the local centre. Centres should follow applicable local policies when procuring 
or using a translator for the purpose of obtaining informed consent to participate in a clinical trial. 
 
In accordance with ICH-GCP 4.8.9, if a subject is unable to read then informed consent may be 
obtained by having the consent form read and explained to the subject. 
 
14.3.1 Obtaining Consent for Pregnancy/Exposure Reporting 
 
Information from and/or about the subject (i.e. the pregnant female, the newborn infant, male 
partner, exposed individual) should not be collected about or from them unless or until they are a 
willing participant in the research. The rights and protections offered to participants in research 
apply and consent must be obtained prior to collecting any information about or from them. If the 
main consent form adequately addresses the collection of information regarding the outcome of a 
pregnancy of a trial participant, a “Pregnancy Follow-up consent form will not be required by 
CCTG.  
 
Trial-specific consent forms for “Pregnancy Follow-up” and “Exposure Follow-up” can be found 
on the trial webpage. The appropriate consent form must be used to obtain consent from any non-
trial participant (such as the pregnant partner or exposed individual). 
 
Participants will not be withdrawn from the main trial as a result of refusing or withdrawing 
permission to provide information related to pregnancy/exposure. Similarly, male participants will 
not be withdrawn from the main study should their partner refuse/withdraw permission. 
 
Obtaining Consent for Research on Children 
 
In the case of collecting information about a child (i.e. the child resulting from a pregnant 
participant/partner or an exposed child), consent must be obtained from the parent/guardian. 
 
For reporting an exposure, the parent/guardian is required to sign an “Exposure Follow-up” consent 
form (even if they are a participant in the main study) prior to collecting information about the 
child.  

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
59 
CONFIDENTIAL 
14.4 
Discontinuation of the Trial 
 
If this trial is discontinued for any reason by the CCTG all centres will be notified in writing of the 
discontinuance and the reason(s) why. If the reason(s) for discontinuance involve any potential 
risks to the health of patients participating on the trial or other persons, the CCTG will provide this 
information to centres as well. 
 
If this trial is discontinued at any time by the centre (prior to closure of the trial by the CCTG), it 
is the responsibility of the qualified investigator to notify the CCTG of the discontinuation and the 
reason(s) why. 
 
Whether the trial is discontinued by the CCTG or locally by the centre, it is the responsibility of 
the qualified investigator to notify the local Research Ethics Board and all clinical trials subjects of 
the discontinuance and any potential risks to the subjects or other persons. 
 
14.5 
Retention of Patient Records and Study Files 
 
All essential documents must be maintained in accordance with ICH-GCP. 
 
The Qualified Investigator must ensure compliance with the Regulations and the GCP Guideline 
from every person involved in the conduct of the clinical trial at the site. 
 
In accordance with GCP 4.9.7, upon request by the monitor, auditor, REB or regulatory authority, 
the investigator/institution must make all required trial-related records available for direct access. 
 
CCTG will inform the investigator/institution as to when the essential documents no longer need 
to be retained. 
 
14.6 
Centre Performance Monitoring 
 
This study is eligible for inclusion in the Centre Performance Index (CPI). Forms are to be 
submitted according to the schedule in the protocol. There are minimum standards for performance. 
 
14.7 
On-Site Monitoring/Auditing 
 
CCTG site monitoring/auditing will be conducted at participating centres in the course of the study 
as part of the overall quality assurance program. The monitors/auditors will require access to patient 
medical records to verify the data, as well as essential documents, standard operating procedures 
(including electronic information), ethics and pharmacy documentation (if applicable). 
 
The drug company, Novartis, has reserved the right to audit participating centres. Audits may only 
be conducted after consultation with CCTG. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
60 
CONFIDENTIAL 
15.0 
REFERENCES 
Anker CJ, Grossmann KF, Atkins MB, et al. Avoiding Severe Toxicity from Combined BRAF Inhibitor and 
Radiation Treatment: Concensus Guidelines from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Int J 
Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jun 1;95(2): 632-46. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.038. Review. 
Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, et al: Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic 
radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295:2483-91, 2006 
Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR, et al: Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery 
or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:1037-44, 2009 
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney 
M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in 
solid tumors: Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1. Eur J Can 45: 228-47, 2009. 
Feuvret L, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for large solitary brain metastases. Cancer Radiother, 2014. 18(2): p. 
97-106.  
Follwell MJ et al. Volume specific response criteria for brain metastases following salvage stereotactic 
radiosurgery and associated predictors of response. Acta Oncologica, 2012; 51: 629–635 
Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, et al: Preservation of Memory with Conformal Avoidance of the Hippocampal 
Neural Stem-Cell Compartment During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases (RTOG 0933):  A 
Phase II Multi-Institutional Trial.  Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 1, 2014, Vol 32, No. 34, 3810-3816. 
Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, et al: Phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial (BREAK-3) 
comparing the BRAF kinase inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436) with dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with 
BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma. J Clin Oncol 30:LBA8500, 2012 
Hecht M, Zimmer L, Loquai C, Weishaupt C, Guntzmer R, Schuster B, Gleisner S, et al. Radiosensitization by 
BRAF inhibitor therapy-mechanism and frequency of toxicity in melanoma patients. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6): 
1238-44. Doi: 10. 1093/annonc/mdv139. Epub 2015 Mar 11. 
Johnson JD, Young B: Demographics of brain metastasis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 7:337-44, 1996 
Kim YJ, Cho KH, Kim JY, et al: Single-dose versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. 
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:483-9, 2011 
Liew DN, Kano H, Kondziolka D, et al. Outcome predictors of Gamma Knife surgery for melanoma brain 
metastases. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 114:769-79. 2011 
Long GV, Weber JS, Infante JR, Kim KB, Daud A, et al. Overall Survival and Durable Responses in Patients 
with BRAF V600-Mutant Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Dabrafenib Combined with Trametinib. J Clin Oncol, 
2016 Mar 10; 34(8):871-8.  
Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 
BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multi-centre, double-blind, phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2015 Aug 
1; 386(9992): 444-51.  
Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone 
in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 371:1877-88. 2014 
Long GV, Trefzer U, Davies MA, et al. Dabrafenib in patients with Val600Glu or Val600Lys BRAF-mutant 
melanoma metastatic to the brain (BREAK-MB): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 13:1087-
95. 2012 
Neal MT, Chan MD, Lucas JT Jr et al. Predictors of survival, neurologic death, local failure, and distant failure 
after gamma knife radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases. World Neurosurg. 82:1250-5. 2014 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
61 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Robert C, Karaszewkia B, Schachter J, et. al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib 
and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1: 372(1):30-9. 
Sahgal A, Aoyama H, Kocher M, Neupane B, Collette S, Tago M, Shaw P, Beyene J, Chang E. Phase 3 trials of 
stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain radiation therapy for 1 to 4 brain metastases: individual 
patient data meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 15;91(4): 710-7. Doi:10. 
1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.024. 
Sahgal A, Larson D, Knisely J. Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for brain metastases. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar; 
16(3): 249-50. Doi: 10. 1016/S1470-2045(14)71106-4. No abstract available. 
Sahgal A, Ma L, Chang E, et al: Advances in technology for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. Technol 
Cancer Res Treat 8:271-80, 2009 
Sampson JH, Carter JH, Jr., Friedman AH, et al: Demographics, prognosis, and therapy in 702 patients with 
brain metastases from malignant melanoma. J Neurosurg 88:11-20, 1998 
Seung SK, Sneed PK, McDermott MW, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for malignant melanoma brain 
metastases. Cancer J Sci Am. 1998 4:103-9.1998  
Skibber JM, Soong SJ, Austin L, et al: Cranial irradiation after surgical excision of brain metastases in melanoma 
patients. Ann Surg Oncol 3:118-23, 1996 
Slotman B, Faivre-Finn C, Kramer G, et al: Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer. 
N Engl J Med 357:664-72, 2007 
Sun A, Bae K, Gore EM, et al: Phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation compared with observation in 
patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: neurocognitive and quality-of-life analysis. J Clin 
Oncol 29:279-86, 2011 
Tsao M, Xu W, Sahgal A: A meta-analysis evaluating stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, or 
both for patients presenting with a limited number of brain metastases. Cancer 118:2486-93, 2012 
Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Shuto T, et al: Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases 
(JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol, 2014 
Yaeh A, Nanda T, Jani A, Rozenblat T, et al. Control of brain metastases from radioresistant tumors treated by 
stereotactic radiosurgery. J. Neuro-oncology, Sept. 2015, Volume 124 (3), pp. 507-514.  
Zahnreich S, Mayer A, Loquai C, Grabbe S, Schmidberger H. Radiotherapy with BRAF inhibitor therapy for 
melanoma: progress and possibilities. Future Oncol. (2016), 12(1), 95-106.  

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
62 
CONFIDENTIAL 
APPENDIX I - PERFORMANCE STATUS SCALES/SCORES 
 
PERFORMANCE STATUS CRITERIA 
Karnofsky and Lansky performance scores are intended to be multiples of 10. 
ECOG (Zubrod) 
Karnofsky 
Lansky* 
Score 
Description 
Score 
Description 
Score 
Description 
0 
Fully active, able to carry on all 
pre-disease performance 
without restriction. 
100 
Normal, no complaints, no 
evidence of disease. 
100 
Fully active, normal. 
90 
Able to carry on normal activity; 
minor signs or symptoms of 
disease. 
90 
Minor restrictions in physically 
strenuous activity. 
1 
Restricted in physically 
strenuous activity but 
ambulatory and able to carry 
out work of a light or sedentary 
nature, e.g. light housework, 
office work. 
80 
Normal activity with effort; some 
signs or symptoms of disease. 
80 
Active, but tires more quickly. 
70 
Cares for self, unable to carry on 
normal activity or do active work. 
70 
Both greater restriction of and 
less time spent in play activity. 
2 
Ambulatory and capable of all 
selfcare but unable to carry out 
any work activities. Up and 
about more than 50% of waking 
hours. 
60 
Requires occasional assistance, but 
is able to care for most of his/her 
needs. 
60 
Up and around, but minimal 
active play; keeps busy with 
quieter activities. 
50 
Requires considerable assistance 
and frequent medical care. 
50 
Gets dressed, but lies around 
much of the day; no active play; 
able to participate in all quiet 
play and activities. 
3 
Capable of only limited 
selfcare; confined to bed or 
chair more than 50% of waking 
hours. 
40 
Disabled, requires special care and 
assistance. 
40 
Mostly in bed; participates in 
quiet activities. 
30 
Severely disabled, hospitalization 
indicated. Death not imminent. 
30 
In bed; needs assistance even for 
quiet play. 
4 
Completely disabled. Cannot 
carry on any selfcare. Totally 
confined to bed or chair. 
20 
Very sick, hospitalization 
indicated. Death not imminent. 
20 
Often sleeping; play entirely 
limited to very passive activities. 
10 
Moribund, fatal processes 
progressing rapidly. 
10 
No play; does not get out of bed. 
* The conversion of the Lansky to ECOG scales is intended for NCI reporting purposes only. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
63 
CONFIDENTIAL 
APPENDIX II - DRUG DISTRIBUTION, SUPPLY AND CONTROL 
 
Drug Distribution 
Commercial supplies of Dabrafenib and Trametinib will be supplied by Novartis to the distributor, Bay 
Area Research Logistics (BARL), and distributed by BARL to participating centres. 
 
 
Drug Labelling 
Drug supplies for this study contain all information required under the drug labelling regulations. 
 
 
Initial Drug Supply 
Once a centre is locally activated (following receipt and review of all required documentation), the CCTG 
will authorize a start-up supply of dabrafenib and trametinib to be shipped directly to the centre. Drug will 
be shipped to the centre within 5 working days of local activation.   
 
Drug accountability and drug re-order forms for each agent will be included on the IND.224 trial website.  
 
 
Drug Ordering (Re-Supply) 
Subsequent requests for more drug should be made by authorized personnel at each centre. A copy of the 
Request for Drug Shipment form (available on the IND.224 trial website) should be faxed to the distributor. 
Please allow sufficient time for shipment of drug. Note: shipment will not be made on Fridays and 
weekends. 
 
 
Drug Accountability 
The investigational products are to be prescribed only by the investigator and co-investigators on the 
participants list. Under no circumstances will the investigator allow the drug to be used other than as 
directed by the protocol. Accurate records must be maintained accounting for the receipt of the 
investigational product and for the disposition of the product (Drug Accountability Log).  
 
Drug Destruction or Return: 
Details to be supplied at the time of study closure.  
 
 
**PLEASE NOTE** 
 
DRUG FROM THIS SUPPLY IS TO BE USED ONLY 
 
FOR PATIENTS REGISTERED ON THIS STUDY 
 
Study drug shipped to participating centres may be transferred from the main hospital pharmacy to a satellite 
pharmacy, provided separate drug accountability records are maintained in each pharmacy.  Investigational 
agent may NOT however, be transferred to pharmacies or physicians outside the participating centre. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
64 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
AMEND #2: 2018-OCT-26 
 APPENDIX III - DOCUMENTATION FOR STUDY 
 
Follow-up is required for patients from the time of registration and will apply to all eligible and ineligible 
patients. This trial will use a web-based Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system for all data collection 
including SAE reporting (see Section 9.0 for details regarding SAE reporting).  For details about accessing 
the EDC system and completing the on-line Case Report Forms, please refer to the Data Management 
Guidebook posted on the IND 224 area of the CCTG web-site (www.ctg.queensu.ca).  
 
Electronic Case Report Form To be Completed/Submitted Electronically 
Supporting Documentation 
to be sent using Supporting 
Document Upload Tool* 
PATIENT ENROLLMENT 
FOLDER 
Must be completed at time of registration to confirm 
eligibility. 
 
BASELINE REPORT 
Due within 2 weeks of patient registration. 
Copies of signature pages of 
main consent forms; relevant 
pathology & radiology 
reports; LVEF report 
TREATMENT REPORT 
To be completed every 4 weeks (i.e. after each 
cycle/reporting period). Due within 2 weeks of end of 
cycle/reporting period. This form documents 
treatment, adverse events, investigations and response 
assessment for each cycle/reporting period. 
Relevant radiology reports; 
LVEF report (if applicable) 
END OF TREATMENT 
REPORT 
To be completed when patient permanently 
discontinues protocol treatment.  Due within 2 weeks 
of end of protocol treatment. 
 
4 WEEK POST  
TREATMENT REPORT  
To be completed once on all patients, 4 weeks after 
the end of the last cycle. Due within 2 weeks after 
contact with patient. 
 
FOLLOW-UP REPORT 
Continued follow-up is not required for patients who 
go off protocol treatment with progressive disease, 
except to document ongoing toxicities (until resolved 
to < grade 2) and late toxicities (including second 
malignancies). For patients who go off protocol 
treatment with response or stable disease ongoing, 
Follow-Up form to be completed every 3 months until 
relapse/progression. Due within 2 weeks after contact 
with patient. 
Relevant radiology reports. 
RELAPSE/PROGRESSION 
REPORT 
To be completed at the time of disease relapse or 
progression. Due within 2 weeks after contact with 
patient.  
Relevant radiology reports. 
DEATH REPORT ** 
Death Report will be required on all patients. Due 
within 2 weeks of knowledge of death. 
Autopsy report, if done. 
SERIOUS ADVERSE 
EVENT REPORT FORM 
All reportable serious adverse events must be reported 
as described in Section 9.0. Preliminary CCTG 
Serious Adverse Event Report due within 24 hours. 
Updated CCTG Serious Adverse Event Report due 
within 7 days.  
All relevant test reports, 
admission, discharge 
summaries/notes.  
*  
Supporting documents should be uploaded immediately after the report they refer to has been submitted electronically. 
**  NB It is the investigator's responsibility to investigate and report the date/cause of death of any patient who dies during this period. Any death that 
occurs during this protocol therapy or within 30 days after last dose must also be reported as a Serious Adverse Event as described in section 9. 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
65 
CONFIDENTIAL 
APPENDIX IV - NCI COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS  
 
The descriptions and grading scales found in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 
(CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for Adverse Event (AE) reporting. All appropriate treatment areas 
should have access to a copy of the CTCAE version 4.0. A copy of the CTCAE version 4.0 can be 
downloaded from the CTEP web site  
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
66 
CONFIDENTIAL 
APPENDIX V - THE TNM CLASSIFICATION OF MALIGNANT TUMOURS 
 
The 7th Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours has recently been released. To facilitate 
this process, educational resources have been made available to promote the use of staging (visit 
http://www.cancerstaging.org). These staging criteria should be used for new trials. 
 

 
PROTOCOL DATE: 2016-NOV-16 
 
CCTG TRIAL: IND.224 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Final Page 
CONFIDENTIAL 
LIST OF CONTACTS 
 
PATIENT REGISTRATION 
All patients must be registered with CCTG before any treatment is given. 
 
 
Contact 
Tel. # 
Fax # 
STUDY SUPPLIES 
Electronic Case Report Forms, 
Protocols, Data Management 
Guidebook, Safety Information 
Available on CCTG Website: 
http://www.ctg.queensu.ca  
under: Clinical Trials 
613-533-6430 
613-533-2411 
PRIMARY CONTACTS FOR 
GENERAL PROTOCOL-
RELATED QUERIES 
(including eligibility questions and 
protocol management) 
Linda Hagerman 
Study Coordinator, CCTG 
Email: 
lhagerman@ctg.queensu.ca  
or: 
Dr. Janet Dancey 
Senior Investigator, CCTG 
Email:  
janet.dancy@oicr.on.ca 
STUDY CO-CHAIRS 
Dr. Teresa Petrella 
Study Co-Chair 
Email:  
teresa.petrella@sunnybrook.ca 
416-480-5248 
416-480-7802 
or: 
Dr. Arjun Sahgal 
Study Co-Chair 
Email:  
arjun.sahgal@sunnybrook.ca 
416-480-4834 
416-480-0456 
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT 
REPORTING 
See protocol Section 9.0 for details 
of reportable events. 
Dr. Janet Dancey 
Senior Investigator, CCTG 
or 
Linda Hagerman 
Study Coordinator, CCTG 
613-533-6430 
613-533-2411 
DRUG ORDERING 
See Appendix II for full details