Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in High-Risk Trauma Patients: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Standard Enoxaparin Versus Two Anti-Xa Adjusted Dosing Strategies
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Traumatic Injury, Venous Thromboembolism
Sponsor: University of Cincinnati

Supplementary Online Content 
Study Protocol 
This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers 
additional information about their work. 

 
Table of Contents 
PROTOCOL TITLE ................................................................................................................................ 3 
Trial Registration ..................................................................................................................................... 3 
INVESTIGATORS ................................................................................................................................. 3 
STUDY SITE ........................................................................................................................................ 3 
SPONSOR ........................................................................................................................................... 3 
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 4 
Abstract/Brief Overview ......................................................................................................................... 4 
Purpose of Study .................................................................................................................................... 4 
Background ............................................................................................................................................. 4 
METHODS .......................................................................................................................................... 6 
Study design ............................................................................................................................................ 6 
Research data collection/study procedures ........................................................................................ 6 
Specimen collection ............................................................................................................................... 7 
Potential Benefits .................................................................................................................................... 8 
Potential Risks, Discomforts, and Inconveniences ............................................................................. 8 
Data Safety Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................................. 8 
Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 8 
Primary Endpoints ................................................................................................................ 8 
Secondary Endpoints ........................................................................................................... 8 
Data storage and confidentiality ........................................................................................................... 9 
Study Population ................................................................................................................................... 10 
Inclusion Criteria ................................................................................................................ 10 
Exclusion Criteria ............................................................................................................... 10 
Consenting process and plan .............................................................................................................. 10 
Compensation ....................................................................................................................................... 11 
Subject costs ......................................................................................................................................... 11 
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 11 
STUDY ENROLLMENT FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 13 
INFORMED CONSENT FORM ............................................................................................................. 13 

 
PROTOCOL TITLE 
Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in High-Risk Trauma Patients: A Prospective, 
Randomized Trial of Standard Enoxaparin Versus Two Anti-Xa Adjusted Dosing Strategies 
 
(protocol version 2; amendments noted) 
November 30, 2016 
 
Trial Registration 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02412982 
 
INVESTIGATORS 
Principle Investigator: 
Molly E. Droege, PharmD, BCPS 
Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Surgery, Orthopedics, and Trauma 
UC Health – University of Cincinnati Medical Center 
Department of Pharmacy Services 
234 Goodman Street, Mail Location 0740 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45219 
Office Phone: (513) 584-2126 
 
Co-Investigators: 
Christopher A. Droege, PharmD, BCCCP, FASHP, FCCM 
Carolyn D. Philpott, PharmD, BCCCP 
Megan L. Webb, PharmD, BCCCP 
Neil E. Ernst, PharmD 
Krishna Athora, MD, FACS 
Devin Wakefield, BS 
J. Richard Dowd, BS 
Dina Gooma, BS, RRT 
Bryce HR Robinson, MD, MD, FACS, FCCM 
Joel Elterman, MD 
Eric W. Mueller, PharmD, FCCP, FCCM 
 
Medical Safety Monitor: 
Jason Schrager, MD 
 
STUDY SITE 
UC Health – University of Cincinnati Medical Center 
 
SPONSOR 
US Air Force 711th HPW 

INTRODUCTION 
Abstract/Brief Overview 
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, potentially life-threatening complication in high-risk trauma 
patients. With emerging evidence demonstrating around 50% of trough serum anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) 
concentrations are subtherapeutic and associated with increased VTE risk, the purpose of this pilot study 
is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel enoxaparin dosing strategy based on anti-Xa values. 
High-risk patients (e.g., risk assessment profile score ≥ 5) initiated on enoxaparin 30 mg q12h per current 
trauma team standard of care. Patients will be excluded for renal dysfunction (Cockcroft-Gault calculated 
creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min or patients on continuous renal replacement therapy), weight < 50 kg or 
> 150 kg, nephrotic syndrome, platelet count < 50 x 103, allergy to heparin, patients on or requiring 
therapeutic anticoagulation at or within 24 hours of admission, isolated intracranial hemorrhage, known 
hyperbilirubinemia, pregnancy, or incarceration. Primary outcome is the comparison of antithrombin-III 
(AT-III), proportion of anti-Xa goal achievement at first, second, and all assessments, and time to goal 
anti-Xa. Patient outcomes include VTE events, bleeding outcomes, patients with bioaccumulation, and 
risk factors for low anti-Xa. 
 
Purpose of Study 
The purpose of this pilot study is to compare two enoxaparin dosing strategies: BID dosing and a dosing 
strategy based on anti-Xa values in high-risk trauma patients. Specific aims include: 1) to compare the 
extent of reduced AT-III activity between patients with anti-Xa ≥ 0.1 IU/mL and < 0.1 IU/mL upon initial 
assay and determine the proportion of patients who reach goal anti-Xa and time to goal anti-Xa between 
two dosing strategies: enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours (with consideration to increase to 50 mg every 
12 hours if recheck anti-Xa is not at goal; see section 6) and enoxaparin 30 mg every eight hours; 2) to 
compare anti-Xa adjusted enoxaparin-dosing strategies based on VTE, bleeding rates, transfusion 
requirements, drug discontinuation rate and bioaccumulation, and 3) to determine patient-specific factors 
that correlate to subtherapeutic anti-Xa such as serial AT-III activity, weight, body mass index, age, 
cumulative fluid administration and thromboelastography (TEG). 
 
Background 
Background and Significance 
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in hospitalized 
patients. VTE risk is highest in the subset of critically injured patients, with the estimated incidence of 
deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) without prophylaxis ranging from 40-80% and 
4-10%, respectively.1 Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) agents are the agent of choice for VTE 
prevention in high-risk trauma patients (i.e., multiple orthopedic trauma; injury severity score [ISS] > 9).2-9 
 
Enoxaparin is a LMWH that is FDA-approved for the treatment and prevention of VTE. Enoxaparin binds 
to and potentiates the action of anti-thrombin III (AT-III). AT-III is an endogenous anticoagulant that 
inhibits factors Xa and IIa (e.g., thrombin) to prevent clot formation. Conflicting evidence exists for the 
optimal enoxaparin dose in critically injured patients. Trough serum anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) 
concentrations between 0.1 – 0.2 IU/mL have been utilized as a surrogate marker for LMWH prevention 
efficacy.10 A single-center, prospective, observational study of high-risk (ISS > 10) edematous (n = 10) 
and non-edematous (n = 11) trauma patients receiving enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours demonstrated 
proportion of anti-Xa < 0.1 IU/mL at 4, 8, and 12 hours were 60%, 90%, and 100%, respectively, in 
edematous patients. Even 64% and 81% of non-edematous patients were undetectable at 8 and 12 
hours.11 Calculated mean enoxaparin half-lives for edematous and non-edematous patients were 0.83 ± 
0.51 hours and 1.85 ± 0.93 hours, respectively (p = 0.014), which suggests rapid elimination of 
enoxaparin. Rutherford12 similarly evaluated anti-Xa values in seventeen critically ill surgery and trauma 
patients receiving enoxaparin 40 mg every 24 hours. Mean steady state four-hour peak anti-Xa was 0.19 
± 0.09 IU/mL while the mean trough was 0.04 ± 0.04 IU/mL. Fifteen (88%) patients had a trough anti-Xa 
≥ 0.1 IU/mL with five (29%) patients having a trough anti-Xa of zero. If anti-Xa provides a marker for 
efficacy, the above results suggest enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours and 40 mg every 24 hours will not 
provide adequate VTE prophylaxis. Only one retrospective review has evaluated VTE events between 
enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours and 40 mg every 24 hours, which was not statistically significant (1.1% 
vs. 2.9%, p = 0.118).13 

Robinson14 performed a prospective, randomized trial following serial anti-Xa levels at baseline, 4, 12, 16, 
and 24 hours for three days in medical/surgical ICU patients receiving enoxaparin 40 mg once daily 
versus 30 mg twice daily, 40 mg twice daily, or 1 mg/kg once daily. Majority of patients (88%) were 
admitted for medical, not surgical, diagnoses. An anti-Xa between 0.1 – 0.4 IU/mL was maintained for 
33.3% in 40 mg daily group, 41.7% in 30 mg twice-daily group, 83% in 1 mg/kg daily group, and 91.7% in 
40 mg twice-daily group of the study period. Mean steady-state peak anti-Xa levels were 0.13 IU/mL for 
40 mg daily, 0.15 IU/mL for 30 mg twice daily, 0.33 IU/mL for 40 mg twice daily, and 0.40 IU/mL for 1 
mg/kg daily. The authors concluded that enoxaparin 40 mg daily and 30 mg twice daily may provide 
insufficient VTE prophylaxis, but the ideal dose is still unknown. 
 
Increased VTE rates have been seen in patients with subtherapeutic anti-Xa values. Malinoski15 found 
that of 54 patients on enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours, 27 (50%) had subtherapeutic anti-Xa troughs 
and a statistically significant higher DVT rate than those with appropriate levels (37% vs. 11%, p = 0.026). 
Mean peak anti-Xa values were also lower in the subtherapeutic group (0.17 ± 0.1 IU/mL vs. 0.27 ± 0.1 
IU/mL, p < 0.001); however, peak anti-Xa values were not different in those with and without DVT (0.23 ± 
0.12 IU/mL vs. 0.23 ± 0.1 IU/mL, p = NS). A subsequent enoxaparin anti-Xa dose-adjusted protocol 
targeting peak anti-Xa levels between 0.2 – 0.4 IU/mL showed 18 (29.5%) of 61 patients on 30 mg twice- 
daily enoxaparin were at goal anti-Xa after the third dose.16Only 5 (8.2%) patients, all in the therapeutic 
peak anti-Xa group, had a trough anti-Xa > 0.1 IU/mL. VTE events occurred in three patients in the entire 
study cohort (4.9%). Of the 27 patients with dosage adjustments, 22 (81.5%) patients received 
enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily, four patients received 50 mg twice daily (14.8%), and 1 patient received 60 
mg twice daily (3.7%). Of note, there were no major bleeding events, which is not surprising given the 
anti-Xa peak goal is much lower when compared to standard therapeutic dosing goals (e.g., 0.5 – 1.1 
IU/mL). Finally, a before-and-after study evaluated an anti-Xa adjusted dalteparin dosing strategy in high- 
risk (risk assessment profile [RAP] ≥ 5) trauma patients.17 High-risk patients were initiated on dalteparin 
5000 units daily with a 12-hour anti-Xa value drawn after the first dose in the post-protocol group. If the 
12 hour anti-Xa was < 0.1 IU/mL, the dose was increased to 5000 units twice-daily. Low trough anti-Xa 
was seen in 51% of post-group patients. VTE was lower in the post-protocol group (7.0% vs. 12.8%, p = 
0.009) and higher in the subgroup of patients with a subtherapeutic trough anti-Xa (14.4% vs. 5.4%, p = 
0.05). Therefore, anti-Xa adjustment of LMWH may result in fewer VTE events. No difference in blood 
transfusion after the first 48 hours was noted, suggesting appropriate safety with an anti-Xa driven dosing 
protocol for dalteparin. 
 
Previous studies have tried to identify predictors for low anti-Xa concentrations. Young age, high body 
weight, edema, and low peak anti-Xa concentration have been associated with low trough anti-Xa.11, 15, 17 
AT-III concentrations have not been collected or evaluated in many previous studies. Low AT-III 
concentrations have not been evaluated as a risk factor for low anti-Xa. Theoretically, low serum AT-III 
may represent a reduction in substrate to which LMWH can bind and exert anticoagulant effects. Hence, 
LMWH effectiveness and anti-Xa may be reduced. 
 
Pharmacokinetic / Safety Information 
Previous pharmacokinetic studies evaluating enoxaparin prophylaxis and anti-Xa levels suggest high 
inter-patient variability, especially in critically ill patients (table 1).11-12,14 However, the mean maximum 
serum concentration (Cmax) did not reach the lower threshold for therapeutic dosing. Therapeutic 
enoxaparin anti-Xa concentrations are between 0.5 – 1.1 IU/mL for 1 mg/kg every 12 hours, and 1.0 – 2.0 
IU/mL for 1.5 mg/kg every 24 hours.19 No major bleeding events were identified in previous studies. 12,14 
Additionally, evaluation of anti-Xa adjusted dalteparin dosing found no difference in transfusion 
requirements.17 Other evaluations of enoxaparin have found few minor bleeding events such as 
hematoma following total hip arthroplasty, ecchymosis, hematuria, and epistaxis.10,20 Based on these 
previous pharmacokinetic evaluations, patients enrolled in the proposed study would achieve a steady 
state peak between 0.3 – 0.5 IU/mL and a steady state trough between 0.1 – 0.3 IU/mL. Maintenance of 
said anti-levels should prevent major bleeding events. Additionally, exclusion of patients with poor renal 
function, defined as a Cockcroft-Gault calculated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min will reduce the risk of 
bleeding events due to reduced drug elimination. 

Table 1. Previous pharmacokinetic analyses of enoxaparin. 
Trauma Population 
Cmax 
(IU/mL) 
Trough 
(IU/mL) 
Half-life 
(hours) 
AUC0-12 (IU/L 
per hour) 
Vd (mL/kg) 
Non-Edematous*11 
(30 q12h; n = 11) 
0.27 
(0.19-0.59) 
- 
1.67 
(0.64-3.92) 
1.57 
(0.91-3.83) 
45.8 
(28.9-76.4) 
Edematous*11 
(30 q12h; n = 10) 
0.12 
(0.07-0.34) 
- 
0.68 
(0.31-1.97) 
0.63 
(0.34-2.18) 
43.9 
(31.2-68.6) 
Rutherford12 
(40 mg q24h; n = 17) 
0.195±0.088 
0.044±0.043 
- 
- 
- 
Robinson14 
(40 mg q24h; n = 20) 
0.13 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Robinson14 
(30 mg q12h; n = 30) 
0.15 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Robinson14 
(40 mg q12h; n = 40) 
0.33 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Robinson14 
(1 mg/kg q24h; n = 19) 
0.40 
- 
- 
- 
- 
 
Study Justification 
Ideal enoxaparin dose for VTE prevention in high-risk trauma patients is unknown. Predictors and 
explanations for low anti-Xa are also unknown. With emerging evidence demonstrating around 50% of 
trough anti-Xa concentrations are subtherapeutic and associated with increased VTE risk, the purpose of 
this study is to compare AT-III serum concentrations as a predictor of low anti-Xa. Secondly, the study will 
compare two enoxaparin dosing. Ultimately, this information can be used to develop an optimum protocol 
for patient-specific enoxaparin dosing for VTE prevention to improve patient outcomes. 
 
METHODS 
Study design 
This is an investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Multi- 
system trauma patients between 18-80 years old admitted to the University of Cincinnati Medical Center 
(UCMC), an urban American College of Surgeons-verified Level 1 trauma center will be identified by the 
Trauma Surgery team. The trauma team will inform study personnel of these patients once enoxaparin is 
initiated. These patients will be screened for inclusion in the study. Patients who meet inclusion criteria 
will be administered informed consent by study personnel in their rooms. Patients in the surgical 
intensive care unit (SICU) and on the surgical floor are eligible for enrollment if all other inclusion and 
exclusion criteria are met. Informed consent will be obtained prior to enrollment. Goal enrollment is 200 
patients with 100 patients in the control group and 50 patients in each randomization group. 
 
Research data collection/study procedures 
Patients will be screened daily by the trauma team. Research personnel will be alerted to potential 
patients for enrollment. 
 
Intervention 

Serum AT-III and anti-Xa will be drawn eight hours after the third dose of enoxaparin 30 mg q12h. Serum 
assays after at least the third dose should approximate drug steady state trough concentrations. Patients 
with a serum anti-Xa ≥ 0.1 IU/mL will remain on enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours and will be the control 
group. Patients with undetectable anti-Xa (intervention groups), defined as a trough anti-Xa < 0.1 IU/mL, 
will be randomized to receive either: 
a. Enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours (group 1) 
b. Enoxaparin 30 mg every eight hours (group 2) 
Subsequent trough anti-Xa levels will be performed eight hours after the third dose. Repeat anti-Xa 
levels will be drawn eight hours after the third dose of the new regimen(s) (see attached figures) for 
patients in the treatment arms and eight hours after the sixth dose for those in the control arm. For 
patients in group 2, anti-Xa levels will be drawn within 30 minutes of the fourth and eight doses. If 
patients continue to be subtherapeutic, the group 1 dose will be increased to 50 mg every 12 hours, while 
the group 2 dose will remain at 30 mg every eight hours. Group 2 will not have subsequent dose 
adjustment, as this regimen has not been previously evaluated. Coordinated AT-III and TEG will be 
performed with the first anti-Xa assessment and the first repeat assessment in the interventional groups. 
After the initial assessments, weekly anti-Xa and AT-III will be collected on patients requiring dose 
adjustment for up to 28 days. If the weekly trough anti-Xa level is ≥ 0.3 IU/mL, the enoxaparin dose will 
be decreased to the previous dose (i.e., enoxaparin 50 mg every 12 hours would be decreased to 40 mg 
every 12 hours; enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours would be decreased to 30 mg every 12 hours; 
enoxaparin 30 mg every eight hours would be decreased to 30 mg every 12 hours) with patient remaining 
in enrolled study group for all outcome analyses. 
 
Randomization 
Following informed consent, serum AT-III and anti-Xa values will be assayed per protocol. Patients with 
an anti-Xa level < 0.1 IU/mL undergo unblinded 1:1 randomization to ensure equal allocation to each 
intervention group. Randomization will be performed by study personnel. If the standard of care anti-Xa 
per trauma protocol is not collected or inappropriately drawn/mistimed by nursing or phlebotomy staff, 
patients will be able to have a repeat standard of care anti-Xa within 24 hours of initial draw for 
assignment to treatment or control groups for enrollment and outcome analysis (protocol amendment). 
This practice aligns with the current daily trauma protocol operations. 
 
Data Collection: 
Coordinated serum anti-Xa, AT-III, and TEG will be collected as previously described. Time to goal anti- 
Xa achievement will be collected as previously described. Additional data to be collected include patient 
sex, age, weight, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), injury mechanism (blunt vs. 
penetrating), ISS, abbreviated injury score ([AIS] for head, chest, abdomen, extremity, cervical spine, 
thoracic spine, and lumbar spine), RAP, admission and highest serum creatinine, admission and lowest 
creatinine clearance (Cockroft and Gault calculated), admission unit (e.g., ICU; floor), time to enoxaparin 
initiation, heparin initiation (days and number of doses) prior to enoxaparin therapy, VTE events specified, 
length of stay (hospital and ICU), 28-day mortality, major and minor bleeding events, overall mortality, 
interruption of study drug, cumulative fluid balance from admission with each serum assay, total milliliters 
of transfused fluid to date at each anti-Xa assessment, and milliliters of packed red cells transfused in 
specified time frame. 
 
Specimen collection 
Serum assays will be collected as previous described. In summary, initial AT-III and anti-Xa 
concentrations will be performed eight hours after the third dose of enoxaparin 30 mg q12h. Repeat anti- 
Xa assessment will be performed after the third dose of the new enoxaparin regimen, based on patient 
randomization. Coordinated AT-III and TEG will be performed with the first anti-Xa assessment and the 
first repeat assessment in the interventional group. After the initial assessments, weekly anti-Xa and AT- 
III will be collected on patients requiring dose adjustment for up to 28 days. All serum anti-Xa and 
coordinated AT-III and TEG will be drawn 30 minutes prior to stated dose. 
 
Subjects will have the serum assays drawn by either nursing staff via central catheter access or 
phlebotomy via peripheral venous access. All labs will be drawn using two 2.7 mL blue top, sodium 
citrate tubes. One tube is needed for the TEG, while the other is used for the AT-III and anti-Xa. 

Potential Benefits 
VTE are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Optimal LMWH dosing has not been established 
for critically injured patients who have altered pharmacokinetics due to altered volume of distribution and 
metabolism, variable age and weight, and potential decreases in AT-III. Subtherapeutic serum anti-Xa 
trough concentration has been associated with increased risk for VTE. This pilot clinical investigation has 
the potential to revolutionize enoxaparin dosing and VTE prevention through anti-Xa guided dosing. 
Thorough evaluation of risk factors for reduced anti-Xa may provide a focused assessment of patients 
requiring anti-Xa assessment and subsequent dose adjustments. Overall, optimal enoxaparin dosing will 
result in fewer VTE events without increasing bleeding risk with an anti-Xa driven adjustment. Improved 
patient outcomes, expansion of scientific knowledge, and development of VTE prevention protocols may 
result. 
 
Potential Risks, Discomforts, and Inconveniences 
Level of Risk 
VTE risks with inadequate prophylaxis have been previously justified above. Risks of increased 
enoxaparin doses include major and minor bleeding events. Risks will be mitigated by appropriate 
exclusion of patients with low body weight and increased serum creatinine / decreased creatinine 
clearance. Serum assays for risk of bioaccumulation will be performed weekly with subsequent dose 
reduction. Additionally, patient serum creatinine and creatinine clearance will be assessed daily by the 
trauma team with appropriate therapy modification should patient’s renal function worsen. Patients with a 
50% change in serum creatinine or an absolute change in serum creatinine by 1 mg/dL will be removed 
from the study. If these changes in renal function occur after patient has received initial laboratory 
assessment (i.e., anti-Xa; AT-III; TEG) will be included in the primary outcome analysis. 
 
Blood volume loss due to serum anti-Xa, TEG, and AT-III assay as described above is minimal (2.7 mL x 
2). Patients requiring peripheral vein access for serum assays will be at risk for pain/discomfort, bruising, 
fainting, and infection from phlebotomy sites. 
 
Data Safety Monitoring Plan 
Collected data will be screened for adverse events. Jason Schrager, MD will act as medical monitor and 
review collected data and all adverse events to ensure patient safety. 
 
Data Analysis 
Primary Endpoints 
1. Initial AT-III activity between the control group and the intervention group. 
2. Proportion of patients reaching goal anti-Xa between group 1 and group 2 overall, at first 
repeat assessment, and at second repeat assessment. 
3. Median time to achievement of goal anti-Xa between group 1 and group 2. 
 
Secondary Endpoints 
1. Patient outcomes to be compared between control and intervention groups including all VTE 
events (i.e., pulmonary embolism; upper extremity deep venous thromboembolism [DVT]; 
proximal lower extremity DVT; distal lower extremity DVT), major bleeding (i.e., hemoglobin 
decrease of ≥ 2 g/dL in a 24 hour period requiring ≥ 2 units of packed red blood cells while on 
enoxaparin; worsened or new intracranial hemorrhage while on enoxaparin; repeat surgical 
intervention due to hemorrhage while on enoxaparin), minor bleeding (minor gastrointestinal 
bleeding [coffee ground emesis with or without < 2 units packed red cell transfusion needed 
while on enoxaparin]; interruption of study drug by trauma team; other overt bleeding not 
characterized a major while on enoxaparin), total transfusion requirements after 48 hours 
until discharge or admission day 28. 
2. Proportion of patients with enoxaparin bioaccumulation (defined as an anti-Xa ≥ 0.3 IU/mL at 
any assay) between group 1 and 2. 
3. Risk factor determination for low anti-Xa. 

Statistical analyses will be performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). An intention- 
to-treat model will be used for data analysis. Patients excluded due to change in renal function will be 
included in the primary outcome analysis, but not patient outcome analyses for VTE and bleeding 
outcomes.   Nominal data will be reported using frequencies of occurrence and proportions as 
appropriate. Continuous data will be reported using means and standard deviations or medians and 
ranged as appropriate per distribution. Hypothesis testing for nominal data will be performed using the 
Fisher’s exact test or chi square test as required based on sample size. Continuous data will be 
compared using student’s t-test/ANOVA or rank sum/Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA for normally distributed and 
non-normally distributed data, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 will designate statistical significance. Time- 
to-event analyses will be compared as appropriate and presented as Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate 
logistic regression will be performed for low anti-Xa risk determination. All values with a p-value < 0.2 will 
be included in the model. Serum AT-III, weight, and age will be forced into the model, regardless of p- 
value. 
 
A total of 200 patients will be enrolled. Assuming that 50% of patients will have an undetectable anti-Xa 
on enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours, we hypothesize the intervention group will have an absolute 
reduction in AT-III activity of 10% compared to the control group if the control group has a mean AT-III 
activity of 80% with a standard deviation of 25%. Secondarily, we hypothesize that there will be an 
absolute difference of 27% in the proportion of patients who achieve goal anti-Xa between group 1 and 
group 2, assuming 50% of group 1 achieves goal. To achieve an 80% power with an alpha of 0.05 for 
both outcomes, goal enrollment is 200 patients (table 2). 
 
Table 2. Power analysis for each outcome 
AT-III activity difference between control and intervention 
Absolute difference in means 
Standard Deviation 
Sample Size 
10% 
25% 
200 
10% 
30% 
286 
10% 
10% 
34 
20% 
30% 
74 
20% 
10% 
12 
Anti-Xa ≥ 0.1 IU/mL attainment between group 1 and group 2 
Group 1 Proportion 
Group 2 Proportion 
Sample Size 
50% 
77% 
100 
50% 
75% 
116 
60% 
80% 
164 
80% 
90% 
398 
70% 
80% 
588 
VTE reduction between study groups 
Estimate Source 
Control Proportion 
Intervention Proportion 
Sample Size 
Malinoski15 
37% 
11% 
98 
Droege17 
14.5% 
5.5% 
390 
2013 UCMC Trauma 
Registry VTE 
5.5% 
2.5% 
1468 
2013 UCMC Trauma 
Registry VTE 
5.5% 
4.5% 
6576 
 
 
Data storage and confidentiality (include sample storage if applicable) 
A single, central, electronic database will be constructed using Microsoft Excel® for storing all study- 
related data (attached). The database will be password protected such that only authorized study 
personnel can access the data. Data will be maintained in a confidential manner with regular reminders 
of the need for confidentiality provided from the senior investigator. A single subject log will be kept for 
matching patient study number, initials, medical record number, and admission date (attached). Once 
assigned to the log, patients will only be evaluated using their de-identified, study number. Data entered 
into the electronic database will be de-identified. 

Once the study has been completed, the electronic database will be maintained in a locked office, per the 
IRB specifications. Only study personnel will have access to the data. Once the IRB-approved time has 
elapsed, all materials will be destroyed. 
 
Study Population 
Patients admitted to the UCMC trauma service are eligible for enrollment. 
 
Inclusion Criteria 
a. Patients with an anticipated length of stay of at least 72 hours 
b. High-risk patients initiated on enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 hours per the existing VTE 
prophylaxis protocol 
a. High-risk is defined as patients with a risk assessment profile (RAP) ≥ 5.19 
b. Trauma team VTE prophylaxis protocol contraindications to chemical prophylaxis 
include 
i. Intracranial bleeding (e.g., chemical prophylaxis contraindicated within 24 
hours of documented stable head computed tomography [CT]), 
ii. Incomplete spinal cord injury with hematoma within 24 hours post-injury 
iii. Ongoing hemorrhage 
iv. Uncorrected coagulopathy 
v. ≥ grade IV liver or spleen injury 
vi. Intraocular injuries. 
c. Age 18 – 80 years old 
 
 
Exclusion Criteria 
a. Renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min or patients on continuous renal 
replacement therapy) 
b. Weight < 50 kg or > 150 kg 
c. Platelet count < 50 x 103 
d. Allergy to heparin or low molecular weight heparins 
e. Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation at admission or requiring it within 24 hours of 
admission 
f. 
Isolated intracranial hemorrhage 
g. Known hyperbilirubinemia (defined as serum bilirubin > 6.6 mg/dL; interferes with the anti-Xa 
chromogenic assay) 
h. Patients with a RAP score ≥ 5 without enoxaparin initiated within 72 hours of admission 
i. 
Pregnancy 
j. 
Incarceration 
 
Patients with a 50% change in serum creatinine or an absolute change in serum creatinine by 1 mg/dL 
after randomization will be removed from the study. If these changes in renal function occur after patient 
has received initial laboratory assessment (i.e., anti-Xa; AT-III; TEG), the patient will be included in the 
primary outcome analysis per intention-to-treat design. 
 
Consenting process and plan 
Patients will be identified as previously described per trauma service. Permission to consent per the 
trauma team attending will be obtained prior to administration of consent. Patients initiated on enoxaparin 
30 mg every twelve hours prior per the trauma protocol who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be 
eligible for consent. Study personnel will administer in the patient’s room. Informed consent will be 
obtained prior to first serum laboratory assay. The trauma team should alert research personnel as soon 
as possible for administration of informed consent. Patients will be able to be consented and enrolled up 
to four hours prior to the first serum laboratory assay. At-risk or vulnerable patients unable to give 
consent will have next of kin consented. Investigators will be available seven days a week and will 

continue correspondence with subjects throughout the study and until hospital discharge (see “Informed 
Consent” form). 
 
Compensation 
Patients will not receive any direct compensation for research involvement. 
 
Subject costs 
There are no additional costs to subjects. 
 
REFERENCES 
1. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, Colwell CW. Prevention 
of Venous Thromboembolism. The Eighth ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic 
Therapy. Chest 2008; 133:381S-453S. 
2. Geerts WH, Jay RM, Code KI, et al. A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight 
heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med 1996; 
335:701–707. 
3. Knudson MM, Morabito D, Paiement GD, Shakleford S. Use of low molecular weight heparin in 
preventing thromboembolism in trauma patients. J Trauma 1996; 41:446–459. 
4. Velhamos GC, Nigro J, Tatevossiam R, et al. Inability of an aggressive policy of 
thromboprophylaxis to prevent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically injured patients: are 
current methods of DVT prophylaxis insufficient? J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187:529-533. 
5. Cothren CC, Smith WR, Moore EE, Morgan SJ. Utility of once-daily dose of low-molecular-weight 
heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in multisystem trauma patients. World J Surg 2007; 
31:98-104. 
6. Arnold JD, Dart BW, Barker DE, et al. Unfractionated heparin three times a day versus 
enoxaparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients. Am Surg 2010;563- 
570. 
7. Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, et al. Prevention of VTE in Orthopedic Surgery 
Patients Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of 
Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012; 
141(2)(Suppl):e278S–e325S. 
8. Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: 
Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest 
Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2):e227S-77S. 
9. Rogers FB, Cipolle MD, Velmahos G, et al. Practice Management Guidelines for the Prevention 
of Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients: The EAST Practice Management Guidelines 
Work Group. Journal of Trauma. 2002;53(1):142-64. 
10. Levine MN, Planes A, Hirsh J, et al. The relationship between anti-factor Xa level and clinical 
outcome in patients receiving enoxaparine low molecular weight heparin to prevent deep vein 
thrombosis after hip replacement.. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1989;62(3):940-4. 
11. Haas CE, Nelsen JL, Raghavendran K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of 
Enoxaparin in Multiple Trauma Patients. Journal of Trauma. 2005;59(6):1336-43. 
12. Rutherford EJ, Schooler WG, Sredzienski E, et al. Optimal Dose of Enoxaparin in Critically Ill 
Trauma and Surgical Patients. Journal of Trauma. 2005;58:1167–70. 
13. Bush S, LeClaire A, Hampp C, Lottenberg L. Once- versus twice-daiy enoxaparin for venous 
thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk trauma patients. J Intensive Care Medicine 
2011;26(2):111-5. 
14. Robinson S, Zincuk A, Larsen UL. A Comparison Study of Varying Doses of Enoxaparin for 
Thromboprophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial. 
Critical Care. 2013;17(2);epub ahead of print. 
15. Malinoski D, Jafari F, Ewing T, et al. Standard Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing Leads to 
Inadequate Anti-Xa Levels and Increased Deep Venous Thrombosis Rates in Critically Ill Trauma 
and Surgical Patients. Journal of Trauma. 2010;68(4):874-80. 
16. Costantini TW, Min E, Box K, et al. Dose Adjusting Enoxaparin is Necessary to Achieve Adequate 
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care 
Surgery. 2013;74:128-35. 

17. Droege ME, Mueller EW, Besl KM, et al. Effect of a dalteparin prophylaxis protocol using anti- 
factor Xa concentrations on venous thromboembolism in high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma 
Acute Care Surg 2014; in press. 
18. Gearhart MM, Luchette FA, Proctor MC, Lutomski DM, Witsken C, James L, et al. The risk 
assessment profile score identifies trauma patients at risk for deep vein thrombosis. Surgery 
2000; 128:631-40. 
19. Lovenox (enoxaparin). Package Insert. Sanofi. 
20. Slavik RS, Chan E. Dalteparin versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in 
acute spinal cord injury and major orthopedic trauma patients; ‘DETECT’ trial. J Trauma 
2007;62:1075-81. 

STUDY ENROLLMENT FIGURES 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
• 
• 
 
 
I 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  I 
 
Noi 
 
 
 
iYes 
Continue 30 mg q8h 
I 
 
Increase to 50 mg q12h 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
• 
 
' 
R atSerum Laborato!)l 
Analvsis, Assay:#4 
Eight hours after 3'ddose 
obtain the folowing: Anti- 
factor Xa,Antithronmin-111, 
KaolinTEG 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
     
 
 
Patient randomization 
Per 1:1 block randomization random nurrmer 
generator 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
    
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
R atSerum Laborato!)l 
Analvsis, Assay:#4 
Eight hours after 3'ddose 
obtain the folowing: Anti- 
factor Xa,Antithronmin-111, 
KaolinTEG 
R atAnti-factorXa/ 
AT-Ill Weeklv (Assay:#5-8} 
To be obtainedeight hours 
afterthe priorPM doseon 
days7, 14, 21,and 28 
R atAnti-factorXa/ 
AT-Ill Weeklv (Assay:#5-8} 
To be obtainedeight hours 
afterthe prior PM doseon 
days7, 14,21,and 28 
R atAnti-factor Xa / 
AT-Ill Weeklv (Assay:#5-8} 
To be obtainedwithin 30 
minutes prior to the AM dose 
on days7, 14, 21, and 28 

INFORMED CONSENT FORM 
 
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI - Medical 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY 
 
Study Title: Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in High-Risk Trauma 
Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Standard Enoxaparin Versus Two Anti-Xa 
Adjusted Dosing Strategies 
 
UC IRB Study #: 2014-3627 
Sponsor Name: US Air Force 
 
Investigator Information: 
 
Molly Droege 
513-584-2126 
Principal Investigator Name 
Telephone Number 24 hr Emergency 
Contact 
 
Subject Name: 
Date of Birth: 
/ 
/ 
 
 
INTRODUCTION: 
 
A biomedical or health-related research study is performed to answer specific questions 
about a disease. 
 
Before you agree to participate in this research study, it is important that you be told the 
purpose, procedures, benefits, risks, discomforts, and precautions of the research. You 
should also be told what alternative procedures are available to you if you do not 
participate in the research study. The informed consent document is a written summary 
of this information. Be sure to ask questions while you read this consent document and 
ask questions if there is anything that you do not understand. 
 
Your participation in this research study is entirely voluntary. 
 
You may choose either to take part or not to take part in this research study. If you 
decide to take part, you may decide to leave the study at any time. Leaving the study 
will not result in any penalty or loss of benefits to you. 
 
The researcher and sponsor of this study do not promise that you will receive any 
benefits from this study. 
 
If you are acting as a representative to give consent for another person to participate in 
this study, “you” throughout this consent form refers to that individual. 
 
The obligation of a representative is to try to determine what the individual would do if 
competent, or if the subject's wishes cannot be determined, what the representative 
thinks is in the person's best interest. If possible, an attempt should be made to obtain 

permission from the individual. Some persons may resist participating in a research 
protocol that has been approved by their representatives. Under no circumstances may 
individuals be forced to participate. 
 
 WHY IS THIS RESEARCH BEING DONE? 
 
There are two reasons this research is being done. 
1.) To find blood markers that may explain why some patients have low levels of the 
drug enoxaparin. Enoxaparin is used to stop blood clots from being made. Blood 
clots are usually formed in the legs and the lungs. If a blood clot occurs in the 
lungs, it can be life threatening. People with major injuries are at high risk for 
blood clots. 
2.) To learn the best dose of the medicine enoxaparin in patients with injuries. 
 
Enoxaparin is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention 
of blood clots. Enoxaparin is the accepted drug for prevention in trauma patients by 
many physician groups including the United States Air Force. 
 
WHY HAVE YOU BEEN ASKED TO TAKE PART IN THIS RESEARCH STUDY? 
 
You are being asked to take part in this research study because, you are at least 18 
years old and not more than 80 years of age, have a traumatic injury and have a high 
risk of forming a blood clot. 
 
HOW LONG WILL YOU BE IN THE RESEARCH STUDY? 
 
You will be in the research study for up to four (4) weeks or until you are discharged 
from the hospital, whichever comes first. 
 
The researcher may decide to take you off this research study at any time. The 
treatment team may also decide to take your off this research at any time. If you have 
side effects that could be from the study medications, you will be taken out of the study. 
If there are any changes in your condition that would increase your risk of bleeding, the 
study medication will be stopped temporarily or permanently and you may be removed 
from the study. 
 
You may withdraw from the study at any time. If you decide to stop participating in the 
study, we encourage you to talk to the researcher and your doctor first so that stopping 
can be done safely. Another reason to tell your doctor that you are thinking about 
stopping is to discuss what follow-up care and testing could be most helpful to you. 
 
You may be contacted in the future by representatives of the University of Cincinnati 
who are interested in asking you survey questions about your participation in this 
research study. If you choose to participate in the survey, your responses will be used 
for quality assurance purposes only. 

WHO IS CONDUCTING THE RESEARCH STUDY? 
 
This study is sponsored by the United States Air Force. 
 
The study is directed by Molly Droege, PharmD, the researcher at the University of 
Cincinnati Medical Center. Medical supervision for the study is provided by Krishna 
Athota, MD. 
 
HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL TAKE PART IN THE RESEARCH STUDY? 
 
About 200 people will take part in this study at the University of Cincinnati Medical 
Center. 
 
WHAT IS INVOLVED IN THE RESEARCH STUDY? 
 
You will be receiving 30 mg of enoxaparin twice daily as part of your clinical care. 
 
If you choose to participate in the study, you will have 5.4 mL of blood (a little over a 
teaspoon) drawn before receiving your fourth (4th) standard of care dose of enoxaparin 
to have three blood tests run. 
1. Antithombin-III (AT-III) – is naturally in your body. Enoxaparin works with it to 
stop clots from forming. Measuring AT-III ensures the drug has the ability to work 
in your body. 
2. Anti-activated factor Xa (anti-Xa) – measures how much enoxaparin is in your 
body. 
3. Thromboelastography (TEG) – measures how well your body forms clots. 
 
These blood labs will allow the investigators to determine what affects enoxaparin and 
how well enoxaparin stops clots from forming. You may benefit from this extra 
monitoring. 
 
If your anti-Xa level is normal, you will continue on the current dose of enoxaparin. No 
additional blood tests will be taken. 
 
If your anti-Xa level is low, you will receive one of two following investigational doses of 
enoxaparin. These doses are higher than the FDA approved dose. The doses are: 
1. 
Enoxaparin 40 mg injected under the skin twice a day 
2. 
Enoxaparin 30 mg injected under the skin three times a day 
 
Which dose you receive will be determined completely by chance. You will have an 
equal chance of being placed in either group. This dose adjustment may benefit you by 
decreasing your risk of blood clot. 
 
Four hours after receiving the third investigational dose, 2.7 mL of blood will be drawn to 
run an anti-Xa test. This will tell the investigators how much enoxaparin is in your blood 
when the drug is at its highest amount. 

 
Before the fourth investigational dose, you will have 5.4 mL (a little over a teaspoon) of 
blood drawn to run the three tests again. The three tests are the AT-III, anti-Xa, and 
TEG. These tests may benefit you because they will tell the investigators how well the 
drug is preventing blood clots. If your anti-Xa level is still low and you are in the group 
receiving enoxaparin 40 mg twice a day, your dose will be increased to 50 mg twice a 
day. Otherwise your dosage will remain the same. If your anti-Xa level is too high, your 
dose will be decreased to 30 mg twice a day. This may benefit you by preventing too 
much drug from getting in your blood. 
 
Before the fourth adjusted dose for the group receiving 50 mg twice a day, or the eighth 
investigational dose for the 30 mg every eight (8) hours group, you will have 5.4 mL of 
blood drawn again to run the three tests. The three tests are the AT-III, anti-Xa, and 
TEG. 
 
Additional blood (2.7 mL each time) will be drawn to test Anti-Xa levels on days seven 
(7), fourteen (14), twenty-one (21), and twenty-eight (28) if you are still in the hospital 
and are in one of the groups receiving the investigational doses. 
 
The expected maximum amount of blood that will be drawn if you are in one of the 
investigational groups for the entire 28 days is 29.7 mL or about two tablespoons. 
If at any time your anti-Xa level gets too high, your dose will be decreased back to the 
previous dose. If at any time the trauma team believes you are having abnormal 
bleeding, a dose will not be given until it is determined to be safe or bleeding has 
stopped. 
 
If you decide to withdraw from the study at any time, you will resume the standard care 
enoxaparin dosage. The standard dose is 30 mg twice per day. Depending on when 
you withdraw from the study, the team may draw an anti-Xa and adjust your dose to 40 
mg twice per day. This is the current routine care for trauma patients at the University of 
Cincinnati Medical Center. 
 
WHAT ARE THE RISKS AND DISCOMFORTS OF THE RESEARCH STUDY? 
 
There may be unknown or unforeseen risks associated with study participation. 
 
Common side effects of enoxaparin: 
 Low red blood cell and platelet counts 
 Redness, irritation, and bleeding at the injection site 
 Minor bleeding such as bruising or from existing cuts or injuries 
 Feeling light-headed, dizzy, or fainting 
 Tiredness 
 Allergic reaction 
 Skin rash or hives 
 Nose or gum bleeding 
 Red or tarry stools 

 Red or dark brown urine 
 
There may be risks of drawing blood (venipuncture). Risks of having your blood drawn 
include faintness, inflammation of the vein, pain, bruising, bleeding at the site of the 
puncture and, rarely, infection. 
 
ARE THERE BENEFITS TO TAKING PART IN THE RESEARCH STUDY? 
 
If you agree to take part in this research study, you will have additional monitoring 
outside normal care that may benefit you. Specifically, the blood samples being 
collected will determine how well enoxaparin is preventing blood clots. Additionally, it is 
possible that adjusted enoxaparin dosing may decrease the risk of clot formation and 
blood clot-related death. The investigator evaluations are over and above the standard 
of care. Information learned from this research study may benefit you while you are 
enrolled in the study and benefit other patients with injury in the future. 
WHAT OTHER CHOICES FOR CARE ARE THERE? 
 
Instead of being in this research study, you can continue with the usual standard for clot 
formation prevention. The physicians on the trauma service will continue to prescribe 
enoxaparin or other medications and devices for the prevention of clot. This is the 
trauma service standard of care for patients at risk for clot formation. 
 
WHAT IS THE CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY? 
 
A description of this clinical trial will be available on www.clinicaltrials.gov, as required 
by U.S. Law. ClinicalTrials.gov is a registry and results database of publicly and 
privately supported clinical studies of human participants conducted around the world. 
 
This Web site will not include information that can identify you. At most, the Web site 
will include a summary of the results. You can search this Web site at any time. 
 
AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION 
You will receive a copy of this signed and dated consent form. 
 
You will be told about any new information from this or other studies that may affect 
your health, welfare, or willingness to stay in this study. 
 
WHAT ARE YOUR COSTS TO BE IN THIS STUDY? 
There are no additional costs to you or your insurance for participation in this study. Any 
study costs for blood samples, doses given above 30 mg twice daily, or other study- 
related tests will be paid for by the study funding. 
 
WILL YOU BE PAID TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS RESEARCH STUDY? 
You will not be paid to participate in this study 
 
WHAT COMPENSATION IS AVAILABLE IN CASE OF INJURY? 

 
In the event that you become ill or injured from participating in this research study, 
emergency medical care will be provided to you. Any illness or injury that directly occurs 
from the study will be reviewed by the University of Cincinnati. The University of 
Cincinnati will decide on a case by case basis if the harm was due to research and 
reimburse you for your out of pocket health care expenses 
 
WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS AS A PARTICIPANT? 
You may choose either to take part or not to take part in this research study. If you 
decide to take part, you may decide to leave the study at any time. Leaving the study 
will not result in any penalty or loss of benefits to you. 
 
The investigators will tell you about new information that may affect your health, welfare, 
or willingness to stay in this study. 
 
If you have questions about the study, you will have a chance to talk to one of the study 
staff or your regular doctor. Do not sign this form unless you have had the chance to 
ask questions and have received satisfactory answers. 
 
Nothing in this consent form waives any legal rights you may have nor does it release 
the investigator, the sponsor, the institution, or its agents from liability for negligence. 
 
HOW WILL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU BE KEPT PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL? 
 
Every effort will be made to maintain the confidentiality of your medical and research 
records related to this study. Agents of the United States Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA), The US Air Force, the University of Cincinnati, the monitor, the auditor, the 
Institutional Review Board (IRB), and other regulatory authority(ies) will be granted 
direct access to your original medical and research records for verification of clinical trial 
(research study) procedures or study data without violating your confidentiality, to the 
extent permitted by the applicable laws and regulations. By signing this consent form, 
you or your legally authorized representative are authorizing such access. The data 
from the study may be published; however, you will not be identified by name. Your 
identity will remain confidential unless disclosure is required by law. 
 
 
Authorization to Use and Disclose Health Information 
 
A federal regulation known as the Privacy Rule gives you certain rights concerning the 
privacy of your health information. Researchers covered by this regulation are required 
to get your authorization (permission) to use and disclose (share with others) any health 
information that could identify you. You should have received a Notice of Privacy 
Practices when you received health care services here. If not, let us know and a copy 
will be given to you. 
 
If you sign this informed consent form, you are giving permission for the use and 

disclosure of your health information for purposes of this research study. You do not have 
to give this permission. Your health care outside of the study, payment for your health 
care, and your health care benefits will not be affected if you choose not to sign this form. 
However, if you do not sign this form, you will not be able to participate in the study. 
 
Who Will Use and Disclose My Health Information? The study doctor and research 
staff (the study team) may use your health information to conduct, review, and determine 
the results of the study. The study team may also use your information to prepare reports 
or publications about the study. However, your name will not appear in any report or 
publication without your permission. 
 
What Health Information will be Used and Disclosed? The study team will record your 
medical history, the treatment you receive, and the results of examinations and tests done 
during the study on study forms. The study team will send the completed study forms to 
the study sponsor.   Representatives from the groups identified below may need to look 
at your medical records to make sure that the information on the study forms is correct or 
that the study was conducted properly. Your medical records may include other health 
information about you and may include documents that directly identify you. Reviews like 
that will take place at the study center or where the medical records are stored and can 
take place after the study is over. 
 
Who Will Receive My Health Information? Your study information or medical records 
(as described above) or both may be shared with the following people or groups: 
 
 The study sponsor or its representatives, including companies it hires to provide 
study-related services 
 Researchers who are conducting this study at other study centers 
 UC Institutional Review Board and any other committees responsible for 
overseeing the research 
 Staff of the UC Human Research Protection Program 
 UC Health employees providing service or care to you 
 Federal and State agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the National 
Institutes of Health (NIH), and other US and non-US government bodies that 
oversee or review research 
 
Will My Information be Protected by the Privacy Rule After it is Disclosed to 
Others? 
UC Health are required by the Privacy Rule to protect your health information.   After your 
information is shared with others, such as the study sponsor, it may no longer be 
protected by the Privacy Rule. The people who receive this information could use it in 
ways not discussed in this form and could disclose it to others.   The sponsor will use and 
disclose your information only for research or regulatory purposes or to prepare research 
publications. In addition to using it for this study, the sponsor may reanalyze the study 
data at a later date or combine your information with information from other 

studies for research purposes not directly related to this study. The goal of any such 
research would be to learn more about drugs or diseases or to help design better 
studies in the future. When using your information in these ways, the sponsor may share 
it with regulatory authorities, other researchers, its business partners, or companies it 
hires to provide research-related services. 
 
What Happens if I Leave the Study Early? If you stop participating in the study early 
for any reason, the study team will tell the sponsor why. If the study team asks you to 
come to any more study visits and you agree, the study team will send the sponsor 
information from those visits as well.   All information collected about you may continue 
to be used and disclosed. 
 
Will My Authorization Ever Expire? This Authorization does not have an expiration 
date. The study team may need to correct or provide missing information about you even 
after your study participation is over and a review of your medical records may also take 
place after the study is over. 
 
May I Take Back My Authorization? You have the right to take back (revoke) your 
Authorization at any time by writing to the person in charge of this research study whose 
information is listed on the front of this form. If you revoke your Authorization, the study 
team will not collect any new health information about you. However, they can continue 
to use and disclose any already-collected information if that is necessary for the reliability 
of the study. The sponsor can also still keep and use any information that it has already 
received. If you revoke your Authorization, you can no longer continue to participate in 
the study. 
 
May I Look At My Study Information? You have a right to see and make copies of your 
medical records. However, to ensure the reliability of the study, you will need to wait to 
see your study records until the study is completed. 
 
 
WHO DO YOU CALL IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS? 
If you have questions, concerns or complaints about this research study or to report a 
research-related injury, please contact the researcher Molly Droege at 513-584-2126. 
 
Please call the University of Cincinnati Institutional Review Board at 513-558-5259 
(Monday – Friday 8 am to 5 pm) if you: 
 Think the research has hurt you. 
 Have general questions about giving consent or your rights as a research 
participant in this research study. 
 Have questions, concerns, or complaints about the research. 
 Cannot reach the research team or you want to talk to someone else. 
 
To report complaints or concerns to an independent agency in an anonymous and 
confidential manner, please call the Research Compliance Hotline at 1-800-889-1547. 

 
 
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI - Medical 
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY 
 
Study Title: Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in High-Risk Trauma 
Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Standard Enoxaparin Versus Two Anti-Xa 
Adjusted Dosing Strategies 
 
UC IRB Study #: 2014-3627 
Sponsor Name: US Air Force 
 
Investigator Information: 
 
Molly Droege 
513-584-2126 
Principal Investigator Name 
Telephone Number 24 hr Emergency 
Contact 
 
I have read or someone has read to me, this Informed Consent Document which 
describes the purpose and nature of this research. I have had time to review this 
information and have been encouraged to ask questions. If I do not participate or if I 
discontinue my participation, I will not lose any benefits or any legal rights. My 
participation in this research is completely voluntary. I have received (or will receive) a 
copy of this signed and dated form for my records and future reference. I have been 
given the information about the use and disclosure of my health information for this 
research study. 
 
 
 
 
Subject or Legally Authorized Representative or 
Relationship to Subject 
Next of Kin (Printed Name) 
 
 
 
Subject or Legally Authorized Representative or 
Date 
Next of Kin (Signature) 
 
PERSON OBTAINING CONSENT 
I have read this form to the participant and/or the subject has read this form. An 
explanation of the research was given and questions from the participant were solicited 
and answered to the participant’s satisfaction. In my judgment, the participant has 
demonstrated comprehension of the information. 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature and Title of Person Obtaining 
Date 

Consent and Identification of Role in the Study 

Please indicate below whether you want us to notify your primary care physician or your 
specialist of your participation in this study. 
 
  
I want the researcher to inform my primary care physician/specialist of my 
participation in this study. 
  
I do not want the researcher to inform my primary care physician/specialist of my 
participation in this study. 
  
I do not have a primary care physician/specialist. 
  
The researcher is my primary care physician/specialist. 
 
 
 
 
Participant 
Date