I want to know the answer to the following question:
What is something that the necessary does not have?
All the background I'm provided with is that "Avicenna adds that the 'Necessary-Existent-due-to-Itself' has no genus (jins), nor a definition (hadd), nor a counterpart (nadd), nor an opposite (did), and is detached (bari) from matter (madda), quality (kayf), quantity (kam), place (ayn), situation (wad), and time (waqt).". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: yes