I want to know the answer to the following question:
Who wrote the book Science Versus Crime which challenged the logic of falsificationism?
All the background I'm provided with is that "The simplest response to this is that, because Popper describes how theories attain, maintain and lose scientific status, individual consequences of currently accepted scientific theories are scientific in the sense of being part of tentative scientific knowledge, and both of Hempel's examples fall under this category.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no