I want to know the answer to the following question:
According to the Eternalist theory, what must we use to describe Homer?
All the background I'm provided with is that "According to this theory, then, Homer really does exist, though we must still use special language when talking about somebody who exists at a distant time—just as we would use special language when talking about something far away (the very words near, far, above, below, and such are directly comparable to phrases such as in the past, a minute ago, and so on).". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: yes