I want to know the answer to the following question:
The centrality of intent broadens what definition, beyond the 1948 one?
All the background I'm provided with is that "The definition upholds the centrality of intent, the multidimensional understanding of destroy, broadens the definition of group identity beyond that of the 1948 definition yet argues that a substantial part of a group has to be destroyed before it can be classified as genocide (dependent on relative group size).". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: yes