I want to know the answer to the following question:
If they're not purely hunter-gatherers, then what do they have a history of being?
All the background I'm provided with is that "In the early 1980s, a small but vocal segment of anthropologists and archaeologists attempted to demonstrate that contemporary groups usually identified as hunter-gatherers do not, in most cases, have a continuous history of hunting and gathering, and that in many cases their ancestors were agriculturalists and/or pastoralists[citation needed] who were pushed into marginal areas as a result of migrations, economic exploitation, and/or violent conflict (see, for example, the Kalahari Debate).". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: yes