I want to know the answer to the following question:
What was Makdisi accused of doing when evaluating the parallels between European and Islamic schools?
All the background I'm provided with is that "Norman Daniel points out that the Arab equivalent of the Latin disputation, the taliqa, was reserved for the ruler's court, not the madrasa, and that the actual differences between Islamic fiqh and medieval European civil law were profound.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no