I want to know the answer to the following question:
How does Dawkins interpret evidence for or against the existence of God?
All the background I'm provided with is that "Some findings in the fields of cosmology, evolutionary biology and neuroscience are interpreted by atheists (including Lawrence M. Krauss and Sam Harris) as evidence that God is an imaginary entity only, with no basis in reality.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no