I want to know the answer to the following question:
What was the argument against the deportation of a Tuvaluan family from new Zealand?
All the background I'm provided with is that "Indeed, in 2013 a claim of a Kiribati man of being a "climate change refugee" under the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) was determined by the New Zealand High Court to be untenable as there was no persecution or serious harm related to any of the five stipulated Refugee Convention grounds.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no