I want to know the answer to the following question:
What period in the 19th century were historians more inclined to draw on the judgements of the chroniclers?
All the background I'm provided with is that "These historians were often inclined to see John's reign, and his signing of Magna Carta in particular, as a positive step in the constitutional development of England, despite the flaws of the king himself.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no