I want to know the answer to the following question:
What did the courts rule was NOT infringement?
All the background I'm provided with is that "In Europe, the copyright infringement case Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd had two prongs; one concerned whether a news aggregator service infringed the copyright of the news generators; the other concerned whether the temporary web cache created by the web browser of a consumer of the aggregator's service, also infringed the copyright of the news generators.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no