I want to know the answer to the following question:
What stood out in Clark's response to Leibniz?
All the background I'm provided with is that "The concave surface is apparently not the result of the interaction of the bucket and the water, since the surface is flat when the bucket first starts to spin, it becomes concave as the water starts to spin, and it remains concave as the bucket stops.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no