I want to know the answer to the following question:
Aside from Walpole, who else denied that there was no such thing as the prime minister?
All the background I'm provided with is that "George II and George III made strenuous efforts to reclaim the personal power of the monarch, but the increasing complexity and expense of government meant that a minister who could command the loyalty of the Commons was increasingly necessary.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no