I want to know the answer to the following question:
In addressing the issue of "in part," the Appeals Chamber found that the part must be a substantial part of what?
All the background I'm provided with is that "In Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic – Appeals Chamber – Judgment – IT-98-33 (2004) ICTY 7 (19 April 2004) paragraphs 8, 9, 10, and 11 addressed the issue of in part and found that "the part must be a substantial part of that group.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: yes