I want to know the answer to the following question:
Which two parts did Terry v. Ohio divide seizure into?
All the background I'm provided with is that "The court further held that during an investigatory stop a police officer's search " [is] confined to what [is] minimally necessary to determine whether [a suspect] is armed, and the intrusion, which [is] made for the sole purpose of protecting himself and others nearby, [is] confined to ascertaining the presence of weapons" (U.S. Supreme Court).". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no