I want to know the answer to the following question:
According to John Harrison, through the Constitution, what is law?
All the background I'm provided with is that "For example, John Harrison asserts that the word "law" in the Constitution is simply defined as that which is legally binding, rather than being "defined by formal or substantive criteria," and therefore judges do not have discretion to decide that laws fail to satisfy such unwritten and vague criteria.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: yes