I want to know the answer to the following question:
How were rebounds of minority enrollment explained in Long's report?
All the background I'm provided with is that "At the same time, affirmative action itself is both morally and materially costly: 52 percent of white populace (compared to 14 percent of black) thought it should be abolished, implying white distaste of using racial identity, and full-file review is expected to cost the universities an additional $1.5 million to $2 million per year, excluding possible cost of litigation.". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no