I want to know the answer to the following question:
Who said the term 'intellectual property' should be rejected altogether?
All the background I'm provided with is that "He claims that the term "operates as a catch-all to lump together disparate laws [which] originated separately, evolved differently, cover different activities, have different rules, and raise different public policy issues" and that it creates a "bias" by confusing these monopolies with ownership of limited physical things, likening them to "property rights".". Is that enough to answer the question?
Answer: no