Take the following as truth: There is a very simple reason why George Stephanopoulos' book contract is less tainting (or less obviously so, anyway) than Gennifer Flowers' or the Arkansas troopers' lining up for tabloid/right-wing payouts.
Then the following statement: "George Stephanopoulous's book is considered to be expert testimony. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive