Take the following as truth: Aside from pure anti-Jesuit animus, this nuance probably arose from the work of some 17th-century Jesuit theologians who imperfectly employed a method known as casuistry in resolving questions of moral theology--an approach that gave the broadest possible leeway to individual behavior.
Then the following statement: "Casuistry might give a great deal of leeway to individual behavior if improperly applied." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: True