Take the following as truth: The best parts of Conley's book are about deep, institutional resistance to  the way that otherwise admirable male professors understandably draw on their training of 20 years ago, which assumed the 70 kilogram male body as the human norm and left them totally ignorant of female health problems; the way training in elite specialties like neurosurgery still promotes a specific kind of cowboy bravado, which encourages women to bail out for gynecology.
Then the following statement: "Cronley's books are about resistance to gender norms in medical school." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive