Take the following as truth: Unable to agree on why Wolf should be embarrassing, pundits have fallen back on the implication that she must be embarrassing, since Gore has been employing her secretly, funneling her payments through other consulting firms, and conspiring to conceal her from the press.
Then the following statement: "Pundits agree that Wolf should be embarrassing because she is publicly employed by Gore who routinely releases press about her work. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: False