Take the following as truth: What really struck me in Skidelsky's account, however, was the extent to which conventional opinion in the 1920s viewed high unemployment as a good thing, a sign that excesses were being corrected and discipline restored--so that even a successful attempt to reflate the economy would be a mistake.
Then the following statement: "That view suggested unemployment as a sign that excesses were being corrected and discipline restored, even though it's always a bad thing nowadays." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive