Take the following as truth: Of course, the legal usefulness of these observations is somewhat dubious, because this attempt to show that Theodore Kacszynski is fit to stand trial depends on the assumption that he is the Unabomber, which in turn requires a trial first, which first requires showing that he is fit to stand trial, and so on.
Then the following statement: "Kacszynski was found to be fit for trial." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive