Take the following as truth: Not an airtight argument (all anti-discrimination laws pick and choose among protected classes), but a cleverly textualist one--and one that seems to have helped convince a majority of the court to strike down the amendment, despite a lack of helpful precedent.
Then the following statement: "The argument was excellent but it failed to convince the majority of the court to disregard the lack of precedent and strike the amendment down." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: False