Take the following as truth: and now they're contesting that movable bug because they didn't state that they were going to put it in this particular home where this meeting took place so there's a technicality there but they know outright that these people are murderers and whatever else you got and yet they're not going to let that evidence in you know as admissible evidence in court so that has to be looked at too um i don't know who they're protecting they're not protecting the innocent that's for sure
Then the following statement: ""They're not protecting the innocent because the evidence has not been ruled as admissible in court, though they are trying to enter new evidence."" is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive