Take the following as truth: Where an excepting provision in a statute is found unconstitutional, courts very generally hold that this does not work an enlargement of the scope or operation of other provisions with which that provision was enacted, and which it was intended to qualify or restrain.
Then the following statement: "If something is unconstitutional, courts never say it doesn't work as an enlargement of the scope." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: False