Take the following as truth: No matter how carefully Starr's sympathizers explained the distinction between the two cases--and even the superior gravity of the criminal case over the civil case--journalists fell back on the Clintonite spin that, as Tom Brokaw put it, Starr's probe grew out of the Paula Jones case and had therefore lost its viability.
Then the following statement: "Starr has been angry at Clinton ever since he ran over his foot with a golf cart." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive