Take the following as truth: And Ginsberg was noted for unleashing many of his more notable works in marathon sessions under the influence of controlled substances, while Podhoretz's work diverged so far from the liberal mainstream that one could argue it could only have emerged using similar means.
Then the following statement: "Podhoretz's writing was so radical in form that it is not unlikely that he used illegal substances to find inspiration." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive