Take the following as truth: yeah under the law he would be stoned so we've been removed from the law of under from being under the law but we're still you know we're still accountable to it we don't need to back talk but you know it's like God changes your heart to not do that he changes your heart not to look upon a woman in lust because in the Old Testament they could look all they wanted just couldn't do it but in the new he's looking at your heart and so i guess that's what what i mean by their character changes and you know what i mean it's like looking beyond what they're doing and looking at a heart and seeing what is the heart what's the character showing me here and those and then any of if i don't think see if i don't believe that there's not a character change and the authorities agree that this person needs to be excused i believe for murder uh rape i even believe incest things
Then the following statement: "He would be stoned due to that law but they preist change it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive