Take the following as truth: The only conceivable argument that can be made for distinguishing Rust is that there even patients who wished to receive abortion counseling could receive the nonabortion services that the Government-funded clinic offered, whereas here some potential LSC clients who wish to receive representation on a benefits claim that does not challenge the statutes will be unable to do so because their cases raise a reform claim that an LSC lawyer may not present.
Then the following statement: "One particular political party wants to ensure the LSC funds are not used for abortion-related services or counseling." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: Inconclusive