Take the following as truth: If the LSC-funded lawyers were here arguing that the statute permitted representation of individual welfare claimants who did not challenge existing law, I venture to say that the Court would endorse their argument- perhaps with stirring language about the importance of aid to welfare applicants and the Court's unwillingness to presume without clear indication that Congress would want to eliminate it.
Then the following statement: "The Court is unwilling to be presumptuous in matters linked to Congress." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: True