Take the following as truth: Although the interview suffers from a number of faults'for instance, it is not penetrating or thorough enough, probably because Aman is a better scholar, writer, and editor than interviewer, and it contains gratuitous information about the interviewer who cannot resist blowing his own horn'it is at least an attempt at documenting that has not, to my knowledge, been done before in the field of linguistics.
Then the following statement: "Aman talents as a scholar and writer exceed his skill as an interviewer, as his interview style is is neither deep or thorough - focusing too far on his own accomplishments. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Answer: False