JerMa88/BMC_Womens_Health_Peer_Reviews huggingface dataset:
Title: Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in
Adjumani district, Uganda; An exploratory study
Version: 0 Date: 01 Sep 2023
Reviewer's report:
This is a really fascinating and rich study. The study adds a lot of nuance and context to issues
of family planning in refugee populations, and benefits from a sound qualitative methodology,
analysis, and deep discussion of surrounding socio-cultural issues related to primary study
findings.
Title: Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in
Adjumani district, Uganda; An exploratory study
Version: 0 Date: 20 Sep 2023
Reviewer's report:
Dear Editor,
I am grateful for the opportunity I was given to review this manuscript.
I find the title relevant and will stimulate further research in the area of decision-making
pathways for contraceptive use among refugees and the host population in the country, as well
as in different countries.
Comments
1. In the abstract section: More clarity is required regarding the study interest, whether on
the use or non-use, or both. I would appreciate it if a specific narrative is maintained. In
your methodology, paragraph one, line three, you highlight “both users and non-users of
contraceptives” contrary to what is indicated in the abstract and title.
2. Background section: Paragraph one, lines 9, 10, and 11, preferably, indicate the unprecedented
number and also provide citations to this note.
The background section is unnecessarily long, with jumbled narratives, characterized by wrong
and poor in-text citations.
The justification for the study is shallow. The study does not clearly detail as to why we need this
study. The study does not seem to have information regarding contraceptive uptake, particularly,
among the refugees.
Line 11: When you highlight the displaced people, which group are you particularly referring
to, considering that we also have internally displaced persons, are you referring to them or
otherwise. Basically, which category of displaced people are referred to here?
Line 13: The statement can be merged with the narrative in line 9, however, cite your source(s)
3. Method section: Did you factor in the duration of residence [permanent or temporal] for each
refugee and the host in the selection study participants?
I think more relevance [study] would be obtained from the respondents that are currently sexually
active [probably last had sexual intercourse at least last six months].
Did you control for past experiences [before they turned refugees] in response to decision-
making pathways for contraception use. If so, how? [Include] And if not, why? There is a
possibility that the responses you receive are those that reflect experiences while in the country
of origin.
Line 78: How about amongst the refugees alone? It would be important to incorporate this
information- Probably, there isn’t an unmet need among the refugees. I suggest that this be
placed in the background section.
4. Sampling and recruitment:
Line 95:  The authors demonstrate that they excluded those individuals not registered as refugees.
The concern therefore is, what happened to the host, whom you highlighted earlier to be part
of your study.
Line 95: Also, what do you mean by “very sick”- How did you measure this?
Line 96: How did you control for this? - Considering ambiguity in residence.
Title: Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in
Adjumani district, Uganda; An exploratory study
Version: 0 Date: 25 Oct 2023
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript is good, timely, and discusses the current challenging issues regarding
contraceptive use in the refugee population. Additionally, it has been well drafted and every
procedure well explained. I only have two points that could be addressed in the ethics section.
i) How did you ensure confidentiality of the participants?
ii) This is a very sensitive topic. Did you ensure privacy while conducting the interviews? If
yes, it would be good to mention how.
Title: Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in
Adjumani district, Uganda; An exploratory study
Version: 3 Date: 25 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
I take this opportunity to thank you for allowing me to review this paper.  I also appreciate the
authors responding to some of my key fundamental issues.  However, I have a few more areas
I notice the respondents have not clarified, and they include;
Background: Line 39: I encourage the authors to include refugee proportions.
Line 45: The authors need to support this claim with relevant literature. I understand that the
authors base this on initial studies they performed, however, it would make more sense if they
cited this initial study. In the case that it is not published, it could be substantiated with related
studies.
Lines 19-50: The authors should be able to relate and cite studies that support such a claim.
Lines 50-51: The authors should support this argument with relevant citation(s)
Lines 81-82: I encourage the authors to substantiate with relevant statistics. For instance, what
could "highest number of refugees" or "fewer number of refugees" imply? This could be
misleading.
Line 105: Did the authors mean cultural leader? Please clarify
Data Collection: Line 128: For uniformity, I suggest a percentage is also placed in brackets in
association with the population size of 220.
For Females, the total proportion of females could be placed in brackets as done for others.
Data Management and Analysis. Lines 151 - 152: Please rectify this, it could be a typo
Line 228: Please, do not forget to insert the figure
Title: Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in
Adjumani district, Uganda; An exploratory study
Version: 4 Date: 29 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
Again, I appreciate you for offering me this opportunity to review this paper. I also appreciate
the authors for positively responding to the previous comments I made.
However, I have got a few more concerns regarding the paper, and they include;
Background:
Line 46 - 47: This claim is problematic because there is a possibility that the methods used in
this study may or may not be appropriate. This is more less hearsay.
Line 48: This seems to be a redundant statement
Line 51 - 53:  The authors should further explain this narrative. Its seems to be incomplete/
redundant.
Title: Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in
Adjumani district, Uganda; An exploratory study
Version: 5 Date: 27 Mar 2024
Reviewer's report:
Line 17: The authors indicate "many" but not provide a numeric figure for this. I suggest they
accompany such a statement with such. The word "many" may not even be many.
Line 46 and 47: I am still concerned with the citing of a study that has not been qualified. There
is a possibility that the statistics are right or not right. I encourage the authors to find more
substantive argument to justify this study.
Thank you
Title: Decision-making pathways for contraceptive use among refugee and host populations in
Adjumani district, Uganda; An exploratory study
Version: 6 Date: 01 May 2024
Reviewer's report:
I would like to appreciate the authors upon their responses.
However, there are minor issues I think would be important for them to address, and these
include the follow;
- Line 10-11: What is the source of this statistic? Global trends on the forced displacement in
2022 indicates that there are 76%. Please cite the source you refer to here.
- Line 83: Delete long or possibly rephrase the statement.
- Line 129: In the table, I suggest that the authors indicate what they imply by letter “N” possibly
at the bottom of the table.
Line 656-657: There should be uniformity in referencing. This should be revised.
Title: A Multi-Task Learning based applicable AI model simultaneously predicts stage,
histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer before surgery
Version: 1 Date: 21 Jun 2024
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the Manuscript titled " A Multi-Task Learning-based applicable AI
model precisely predicts stage, histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer”, topic interesting
enough to attract readers' attention.
Authors should clarify some point and improve the discussion citing relevant and novel key
articles about the topic:
- I suggest a round of language revision, in order to correct few typos and improve readability.
- The authors could evaluate and cite current evidence about evaluation different surgical
approaches for treatment of cervical cancer, considering various outcomes, possible
complications and how each patient's tailored treatment could be improved. I would be glad if
the authors discuss this important point, referring to PMID: 35549629.
- Considering the topic of this study, I suggest reading and adding recent evidence about the
pattern of recurrence in cervical cancer patients after surgical treatment, and the comparison
between minimally invasive approaches and open approach. I would be glad if the authors
discuss this important point, referring to PMID: 37862783.
Because of these reasons, the article should be revised and completed. Considering all these
points, I think it could be of interest to the readers and, in my opinion, it deserves the priority
to be published after minor revisions
Title: A Multi-Task Learning based applicable AI model simultaneously predicts stage,
histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer before surgery
Version: 1 Date: 30 Jun 2024
Reviewer:  Hojjat Farahmandnia
Reviewer's report:
This is an interesting paper and the content is very good but I suggest the paper can be improved
in the following ways:
-Please correct all parts of the article according to the guidelines of the journal authors guideline
Abstract
-please add type of study, years of implement this study, data collection, data analysis method
in both abstract and method in main text.
-In the conclusion part, it is necessary to specify the researcher's proposal to improve the
conditions and use of the beneficiaries
Introduction
Please bring the following items
1- Definition of the research problem
2- The magnitude and importance of the study variable
3- Expressing the necessity of conducting the study
Finally, the practical purpose of the study should be stated
Methods
Please add the following items
-please add the validity of tools in your participant especially reliability in your participants
context.
Pleas add the sampling methods
-please add the details of tool scoring and inclusion and exclusion criteria for select participants
Discussion
In the discussion section, it is necessary to compare the main results of the study with the results
of other studies in this field.
Please refer to journal published articles and used some reference to citation we proposed this
article for enrichment.
- Emotional Intelligence and Self-Efficacy among deputy's administrative staff of Kerman
University of Medical Sciences
- Emotional intelligence and learning strategies of postgraduate students at Kerman University
of Medical Sciences in the southeast of Iran
-What are the strengths and limitations of the study?
Conclusion
# What are your suggestion for future studies?
Best regards
Title: A Multi-Task Learning based applicable AI model simultaneously predicts stage,
histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer before surgery
Version: 1 Date: 02 Jul 2024
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the manuscript, which falls within the aim of this Journal and offers
a high-quality overview of the topic.
The abstract satisfactorily summarizes the contents of the manuscript. Although the manuscript
can be considered already of high quality, I would suggest taking into account the following
minor recommendations:
- The whole text should be corrected by a native English speaker to make the work clearer and
more readable.
- I find it interesting to include a reference to the latest advances in HPV cervical lesions: Golia
D’Augè T, Cuccu I, Etrusco A, D’Amato A, Laganà AS, D’Oria O, Bogani G, Di Donato V,
Muzii L, Giannini A. State of the art on HPV-related cervical lesions. Ital J Gynaecol Obstet.
2024 June p.p. 135-137. doi: 10.36129/jog.2024.161
- I also suggest authors better organize the discussion section following this ideal structure: main
findings of the study, strengths and limitations of the study, implications and comparison with
literature and future directions.
- Discussions can be expanded and improved by citing relevant articles about the risk factors
that influence the recurrence of high-grade cervical lesions (I suggest authors read and insert in
references the following article PMID: 37747763).
Title: A Multi-Task Learning based applicable AI model simultaneously predicts stage,
histology, grade and LNM for cervical cancer before surgery
Version: 1 Date: 06 Jul 2024
Reviewer:  Vittorio Agrifoglio
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the Manuscript, which falls within the aim of this Journal.
In my honest opinion, the topic is interesting enough to attract the readers’ attention.
Methodology is accurate and conclusions are supported by the data analysis. Nevertheless,
authors should clarify some point and improve the discussion citing relevant and novel key
articles about the topic.
Authors should consider the following recommendations:
- Manuscript should be further revised by a native English speaker.
- Authors should better underline  the actual clinical implications of this study. It is important
to report the results obtained by the authors in the context of clinical practice and to adequately
highlight what contribution this study adds to the literature already existing on the topic and to
future study perspectives .
- Was this study registered? I could not find any information about this point
- Despite advancements in detection and treatment, cervical cancer remains a significant health
concern, particularly among young women of reproductive age. Limited data exists in the
literature regarding fertility-sparing treatment. I would add few lines about this topic. Authors
may refer to PMID:38674254
Title: Expanding management strategies for cervical precancerous lesions in resource-limited
settings: Insights from a training center in a district hospital in Ghana
Version: 1 Date: 07 Jun 2024
Reviewer's report:
The manuscripts provide important information and significantly contribute to the efforts to get
a national cancer screening and prevention program in Ghana, so, I support that this manuscript
be published when the following amendments are made.
1) The aim of presenting reasons for the choices made in light of the resource limitation in Ghana
is crucial for consideration in a national screening program when it is to be developed. However,
the manuscript did not include as part of the methods and findings the collection of and an
assessment of the reasons, nor state the algorithms employed at the different times therein.
2) Another major need for revision is that new information on the method and findings was
presented for the first time in the discussion section; it should not be so.
Specific comments and minor edits have been provided in the manuscript.
Title: Expanding management strategies for cervical precancerous lesions in resource-limited
settings: Insights from a training center in a district hospital in Ghana
Version: 1 Date: 16 Jun 2024
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the Manuscript titled " Expanding management strategies for cervical
precancerous lesions in resource-limited settings: Insights from a training center in a district
hospital in Ghana" which falls within the aim of the Journal.
Although the manuscript can be considered already of good quality, I would suggest following
recommendations:
- I suggest round of language revision, in order to correct few typos and improve readability;
- Considering topic and results if this study, I suggest reading and adding current evidence about
the state of the art on HPV infections and HPV-related lesions.
- The persistence of HPV infection is a challenge due the its crucial role on precancerous lesions
progression. Considering result of this study, I would be glad if the authors discuss this important
point with PMID: 37747763 and “State of the art on HPV-related cervical lesions, Tullio Golia
D’Augè, Ilaria Cuccu, Andrea Etrusco, Antonio D’Amato, Antonio Simone Laganà, Ottavia
D’Oria, Giorgio Bogani, Violante Di Donato, Ludovico Muzii, Andrea Giannini, doi: 10.36129/
jog.2024.16.
Because of these reasons, the article should be revised and completed. Considering all these
points, I think it could be of interest to the readers and, in my opinion, it deserves the priority
to be published after minor revisions.
Title: Learning Curve Analysis of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic
Surgery in Treating Ovarian Cysts: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Version: 1 Date: 24 Apr 2024
Reviewer's report:
The study is well written and the results are important for the daily practice and for the surgeons
who want to begin vNOTES cystectomy procedure.
It is better to use the term  'endometrioma' instead of chocolate cyst.
The comment regarding the endometrioma cystectomy should be cautious since endometrioma
mostly accompany with adenomyosis and also peritoneal and ligament involvement. So the
surgery itself is not only cystectomy-it should be total removal of the endometriotic foci. Authors
should add all this precautions and re-write their statement.
Authors are adviced to add different types of vNOTES in daily practice in introduction part
PMID: 35073493 PMID: 32967055 PMID: 34411729 PMID: 32633168
Title: Factors associated with human papillomavirus infections among women living with HIV
in public health facilities in Western Oromia, Ethiopia
Version: 2 Date: 11 Jun 2024
Reviewer:  Luwi Mercy Mwangu
Reviewer's report:
1. It is an interesting, great paper that is very much needed.
2. all comments are in the Word document.
3. use the document  "Interpreting Ratio Measures of Effect" to help with your results and
discussion.
4. please adequately proofread your document also you may use the Grammarly free version
for assistance
Title: Efficacy and safety of 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate in management of
patients with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Version: 0 Date: 03 Apr 2024
Reviewer's report:
1. The abstract structure consists of an introduction, method, result and conclusion. The content
of the abstract describes the content of the study. The purpose of this study was to compare the
efficacy and effectiveness of MgS04 administration for 12 hours vs 24 hours
In the introduction, the reason for conducting research comparing the administration of MgSO4
for 12 vs 24 hours is not too explained (research gap?).
2. Use the latest preeclampsia criteria (line 69)
3. Placement of capital letters according to the rules
4. The author explains the MgSO4 regimen by Pritchard and Zuspan in the introduction. Whether
the eligibility criteria in this study stipulate the administration of MgSO4 based on Pritchard or
Zuspan or include both.
5. Result:  PRISMA  flow diagram (figure 1):  231 record exclude.
Explanation in the results section: “We could not find the full text of one study” (line 191).
What do you mean by sentences: “We found that seizures had occurred in sex pre-eclampsia
patients” (line 221)
6. The discussion should be more straightforward in discussing the findings of this study and
exploring plausible explanations using the relevant literature. The author just repeats what has
been described in the results. Statements that have been stated in the introduction are not repeated
in the discussion
Title: Efficacy and safety of 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate in management of
patients with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Version: 0 Date: 28 May 2024
Reviewer's report:
I have read this article, I find it interesting, several observations that we make should be
corrected.
INTRODUCTION
Online 73-75 says: “severe pre-eclampsia can be detected when the patient's blood pressure
reaches 160/110 mmHg in two circumstances 4 to 6 hours apart or when proteinuria reaches 5 g
or more in 24-hour urine collection.” This assertion of two pressures separated in 4 to 6 hours is
required to be supported with bibliographic references;   Furthermore, for more than a decade,
5 g of proteinuria in 24-h urine has not been used as a severity criterion; this must be clarified.
In the final section of the introduction (lines 113-114) it says that they chose to compare 24 hours
versus 12 hours. Why did they choose only 12 hours if there are studies comparing 8 hours, 6
hours and even without using it postpartum, explain.
Methods
In the eligibility criteria (lines 138 and 139) it says: “All clinical trials (randomized or non-
randomized) comparing the efficacy of 12 Hour versus 24 Hour” However, the results only
include randomized studies and there is no explanation…
In line 141 and 142 it says that in addition to eclampsia they only select 3 side effects and why
3 and why not all of the indicated or known ones.
On line 146 it says that they only include studies in English, explain why.
In line 165, section Quality assessment of included studies, it says: “All included studies were
Randomized Clinical Trials” this contradicts line 138,139. And if there were no other types of
studies, please explain.
Results
Study characteristics, line 195 to 197 says that there is only one study from an industrialized
country, this should be commented on the weaknesses, recommendations and conclusions of
the study
Line 221 should be six no sex.
Discussion
Limitations: line 313-318, they should add that there is only one language, that only one
industrialized country reports studies, that not all the studies are with severe preeclampsia (in
fact there are with mild ones).
Conclusion.
The last 3 lines (324 to 326) do not respond to the result of the investigation, that is to say that
it was not investigated whether sulfate is useful or not, here what was investigated was a period
of use and there it does not say anything about that.