Reviewer’s report  
Title: An unusual cause of postmenopausal vaginal haemorrhage: a case report  
Version: 0 Date: 10 Dec 2018  
Reviewer: Akmal El -Mazny  
Reviewer's report:  
 
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review this interesting study "An unusual c ause of 
postmenopausal vaginal hemorrhage: a case report".  
However, I have some comments and recommendations:  
Title:  
- Is appropriate for the content of the article.  
Abstract:  
- Represents a suitable summary of the work.  
Introduction:  
- Emphasize the gap of knowledge.  
Case presentation:  
- Mention appropriate details of treatment.  
Discussion:  
- Suggest clinical implications.  
Conclusions:  
- Are justified on the basis of the study.  
References:  
- Stick to the format of the journal.  
General:  
- Revise spelling and grammar mistakes.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is r equired in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
No 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, plea se explain in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further  
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
Not relevant to this manuscript  
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
Acceptable  
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or  salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the public ation of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has ap plied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I  have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the  authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Common s 
CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open pe er review policy of the journal