Reviewer’s report
Title:  COITAL RESUMPTION AFTER DELIVERY AMONG OASIS PATIENTS. DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL AND SPONTANEOUS DELIVERY
Version: 0 Date: 17 Oct 2019
Reviewer: Akmal El-Mazny
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review this interesting study "COITAL RESUMPTION
AFTER DELIVERY AMONG OASIS PATIENTS. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL
AND SPONTANEOUS DELIVERY".
However, I have some comments and recommendations:
Title: 
- Is appropriate for the content of the article.
Abstract: 
- Represents a suitable summary of the work.
Introduction:
- Emphasize the gap of knowledge about OASIS and sexual dysfunction.
Methods:
- Adequately describe inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results:
- The text should complement the tables.
Discussion:
- Suggest clinical implications.
Conclusions:
- Are justified on the basis of the results of the study.
References:
- Stick to the format of the journal.
General:
- Revise language, grammar and syntax.
Are the methods appropriate and well described?
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Does the work include the necessary controls?
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an additional
statistical review?
If  an  additional  statistical  review  is  recommended,  please  specify  what  aspects  require  further
assessment in your comments to the editors.
I am able to assess the statistics
Quality of written English
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:
Acceptable
Declaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this
manuscript, either now or in the future?
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the
manuscript?
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that holds
or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?
6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' below. If
your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included on my
report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report including any 
attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' responses. I agree for my 
report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons CC-BY license 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments which I do not wish to 
be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments to the editors, which will not
be published.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal