JerMa88/BMC_Womens_Health_Peer_Reviews huggingface dataset:
Title: Precancerous lesion determinants in women attending cervical cancer screening at public
health facilities in North Shoa Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia: an unmatched case-control study.
Version: 0 Date: 16 Mar 2024
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the manuscript, which falls within the aim of this Journal and offers
a high-quality overview of the topic.
The abstract satisfactorily summarizes the contents of the manuscript. The methodology is
accurate and conclusions are supported by the data analysis. The tables are clear and interesting.
Although the manuscript can be considered already of high quality, I would suggest taking into
account the following minor recommendations:
- I suggest another round of language revision, to correct a few typos and improve readability.
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria should be better clarified by extending their description.
- I find it interesting to include a reference to risk factors that influence the recurrence of high-
grade cervical lesions (see PMID: 37747763).
-What do the results of this study add?
-What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It is
important to report the results obtained by the authors in the context of clinical practice and to
adequately highlight what contribution this study adds to the literature already existing on the
topic and to future study perspectives.
- Discussions can be expanded by citing relevant articles about long-term risk factors for the
recurrence of HVP-related lesions (see PMID:  and 37401466).
- The authors have not adequately highlighted the strengths of their study. I suggest better
specifying these points.
Title: Precancerous lesion determinants in women attending cervical cancer screening at public
health facilities in North Shoa Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia: an unmatched case-control study.
Version: 3 Date: 17 Apr 2024
Reviewer's report:
The quality of the manuscript has improved thanks to the changes made. I think it could be of
interest to the readers and, in my opinion, it deserves the priority to be published.
Title: Psychological Impact and Associated Factors of the COVID-19 Pandemic among
Pregnant Women in Fafan Zone Health Institutions, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia, 2021
Version: 3 Date: 29 Feb 2024
Reviewer's report:
The study is significant as it evaluates the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and
identify associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at health institutions
in the Fafan zone of the Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia, in 2021. However, the authors must
address the following questions to make the paper more holistic and acceptable with a much
robust discussion:.
1. Comparative assessment among other regions could provide a better understanding of
different dimensions of psychological impact, such as anxiety, depression, or stress. Please
provide tabulated findings based on the reports and literature.
2. The psychometric properties of the tools should have been validated.
3. How do the study findings contribute to the existing literature on the psychological impact
of COVID-19 in pregnant women?
4. Are there any antenatal or perinatal factors, such as complications during pregnancy or
childbirth?
5. What are the practical implications for healthcare providers and policymakers based on the
study results?
Title: Risky sexual behavior and associated factors among reproductive age women in Eastern
African countries: A multilevel analysis of the recent demographic and health survey
Version: 0 Date: 09 Mar 2024
Reviewer's report:
Risky sexual behavior and associated factors among sexually active women in Eastern African
countries: A multilevel analysis of the recent demographic and health survey
General:
Even if the topic is quite intriguing and it does a fantastic job of taking diverse countries into
account, personally, I believe the study should address the following concerns:
Abstract:
Methods: The study design was not provided.
Conclusion: The study provided recommendations about drinking alcohol. But I didn't find any
associated results. Then you should base your recommendations on the findings of your study.
Introduction
The introduction needs additional information; as a researcher, you may add more about the
economic, social, and behavioral aspects.
Methods
Study population, sampling technique, and analysis
Do you have any background information for taking these ten countries into consideration for
study outside of the remaining East African nations?
Study Variables
1) The study said that “Even though …. condom utilization during sexual intercourse is
unknown.”. The study's outcome variable gains no additional value from this remark.  So, it is
sufficient to only describe the statement that you used in your study, which is preferable.
2) Regarding the statistical methodology (model), nothing was written. Thus, you should to
provide it.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics
1) It is not essential to describe frequencies along with percentages for interpretation because the
total number of subjects is already known. The percentage is adequate as a result. For instance,
67686 (60.49%), 81140 (72.51%), 67375 (60.21%), 76187 (78.99%), and the like. Similarly,
you should improve it throughout the study.
2) Replace “More than half of 67375 (60.21%) of the participants of the study had work.” by
“More than half (60.21%) of the participants in the study had work.”
3) The descriptions of the terms ICC, PCV, and the like were not provided. So, you should
provide acronyms in the declaration section.
Factors associated with risky sexual behavior among sexually active women in Eastern African
countries
It was not written well; they should rewrite it. It has grammatical issues
Discussion
Well written.
Conclusion
Well written
Strength and limitations of the study
The authors omitted the strengths and limitations of this study; include them.
Title: Impact of primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PC-PTSD) on fertility problem of
Iranian women with infertility during the COVID#19 pandemic
Version: 0 Date: 24 Mar 2024
Reviewer's report:
- Are there any threshold levels for FPI and PC-PTSD-5 scales? You determined the levels and
stated that high values were associated with high stress levels. But, you did not give any specific
cut-off levels.
- In the results section; the second paragraph was similar to the third paragraph. You should fix it.
- I think that your study will give important results to the literature. Infertile women especially
those prepared for ART may be more vulnerable and delaying the treatment process may
have another impact on the stress levels of these women. In the literature, an important study
was presented about delaying the ART cycles during the outbreak (Tokgoz VY, Kaya Y,
Tekin AB. The level of anxiety in infertile women whose ART cycles are postponed due
to the COVID-19 outbreak. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jun;43(2):114-121. doi:
10.1080/0167482X.2020.1806819.). You may mention it and discuss the impact of postponing
the treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Title: Impact of primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PC-PTSD) on fertility problem of
Iranian women with infertility during the COVID#19 pandemic
Version: 2 Date: 08 Apr 2024
Reviewer's report:
The authors have addressed all my comments and feedback sufficiently.
Minor comments: Introduction, page 4, the sentence "The possible problem of the male
reproductive system is due  to rising number of...." needs a reference.
Title: Concomitant ectopic Enterobius vermicularis infection in uterine cervical cancer
Version: 1 Date: 25 Feb 2024
Reviewer:  Imtiaz Wani
Reviewer's report:
Rarity and first case is no criteria for acceptance of manuscript.
The manuscript has pretty rough English.
Abstract
The statement "Diagnosis is made by identification of ova using a transparent adhesive tape or
by microscopic examination of tissue. Mebendazole is the first line medication that should also
be administered to all household members."needs to be restructured.
Delete : in case presentation.
Conclusion "Although not very common, infestation with Enterobius vermicularis should be
considered in differential diagnoses of gynaecological disorders, because even though not highly
pathogenic, serious complications can develop. is not of your case report
Introduction
Reference for "but presence of EV in uterine cervix is rare according to publications. "
Case history
Any history of travel ?
Any history of Antihementic intake ?
Was there any eosinophilia ?
Title: Concomitant ectopic Enterobius vermicularis infection in uterine cervical cancer
Version: 1 Date: 27 Feb 2024
Reviewer:  Nihal Do#an
Reviewer's report:
It is a good work, I congratulate the authors. I have no suggestions about the article. Small
spelling suggestions should be revised and corrected. Enterobius vermicularis likes to hide in
dark areas like other nematodes, I understand that a good pathologist and parasitologist did
not miss it, I thank them. I have one small suggestion, I think it would not be appropriate to
abbreviate Enterobius vermicularis, which is abbreviated as EV (E. vermicularis) italic only
thank you
Title: Gynecological health and uptake of gynecological care after domestic or sexual violence:
a qualitative study in an emergency shelter
Version: 1 Date: 03 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
Many thanks to the editor and authors for allowing me to read their work. The study presents
a topic of great interest and current.
I propose some recommendations to improve the current work:
Introduction: Current references are presented to contextualize the topic of study. It is complete
and of great interest, however, I have a question to ask. The authors present their own previous
research, however, why everything was not done in the same research that allows us to know
and evaluate the results in a more complete way, instead of separating them.
Methodology: I recommend exposing the questions that were used in the semi-structured
interviews to understand the topic in greater depth and how they were carried out, allowing their
replication in subsequent similar investigations by other authors.
The age range of the participants is wide. How do you think this issue could have been affected
and why is such a wide range used with young people and older adults?
Discussion: I think it should be reviewed in depth, discussing the results themselves, rather than
making a repetitive approach to what was already stated in the results section.
Expose potential uses of the results found and how the same line of research would continue
(future research)
Nothing is explained about the theories of human behavior and how these can affect the results.
It is recommended to explain this aspect in greater depth and whether they have been taken into
account when analyzing the results (theories of behavior, social roles, gender roles), which may
affect the results and the discourses of the participants.
Title: Gynecological health and uptake of gynecological care after domestic or sexual violence:
a qualitative study in an emergency shelter
Version: 1 Date: 16 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
This article deals with a relevant topic, namely gynecological care after female domestic or
sexual violence. Regarding the objectives, the results do not show the monitoring of women.
The results (theme 1 and 2) were well described and the reports of the violence suffered were
very detailed. Theme 3, especially the “perception of violence linked to gynecological care”
is the weakest part of the data and little discussed. The discussion and conclusions are not
entirely consistent with the proposed objectives. The discussion is too short and  The information
contained in the conclusion should be part of the discussion. I suggest reviewing the title. There
is little about uptake to gynecological care in the discussion. The conclusion of the summary
must be revised to respond to the objectives and results.
I believe that the article contains valuable information on a very important topic for women's
lives and health.
Title: Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Screening Practices among Women Worldwide: A
Systematic Review of Observational and Qualitative Studies
Version: 0 Date: 08 Sep 2023
Reviewer's report:
• The introduction should describe why this review is important for researchers. What was your
aim to fill any gaps in the literature and highlight areas for future research?
• The first paragraph should not start with percentages.
• The search strategy should clearly state PICOS.
• The inclusion criteria include 15 years and older. Please explain why?
• How did you measure the risk of bias in the included studies?
• Table 4 and Table 5 should be removed and summarised in the paragraph.
• The first paragraph of the discussion should state the aim of the study.
• Therefore, the methods of the studies included in this review were not the same. What do you
mean by this sentence? Please correct the language.
• Please add strength of your research
• Please add reference following sentence indiscussion. In addition, there is a wide variation
among the rates of screening methods in the studied investigations around the world. For
instance, the highest rates of screening by mammography have been reported in Sweden,
Belgium, the U.S., and Australia. While the mentioned countries have reported the lowest rates
of breast self-examination among their screening methods, Egypt, Ethiopia, Turkey, Iran, and
Iraq have reported the highest rates of using this method. This is less than 70 percent of the
WHO’s breast cancer screening programs.
• In the discussion section, it is recommended to write in one section instead of separating them
as headings
Title: Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Screening Practices among Women Worldwide: A
Systematic Review of Observational and Qualitative Studies
Version: 0 Date: 26 Nov 2023
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors and editors,
Thank you for the invitation to review the manuscript entitled “Factors Influencing Breast
Cancer Screening Practices among Women Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Observational
and Qualitative Studies”
Generally, it is a relevant study to review the factors influencing breast cancer screening practice
worldwide. Kindly see the suggestions for the further improvement of the manuscript.
Methods
1. The authors described that “PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase and Google Scholar”
were searched. Please include the justification for selecting these databases and sources in this
review.
2. “breast self-examination” is not considered as screening method. However, it is encouraged
to conduct to improve self-awareness among women and to empower them for any breast
abnormality.
3. Study selection should be conducted by two independent researchers at each stage and
discrepancies should be resolved by discussion.
4. The title has been mentioned that Qualitative Studies were included in this review. The data
extraction method should be explicitly described for the quantitative studies, and qualitative
studies separately.
Results
5. Systematic review of qualitative studies should be carefully considered and conducted. Kindly
see the Cochrane Qualitative evidence synthesis chapter as a reference.
https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-21
Thank you.
Title: Minimally Invasive Treatment of Uterine Necrosis with Favorable Outcomes: An
uncommon case presentation and literature review
Version: 2 Date: 06 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear author
Please add information such as gravity, parity ,... in the manuscript's abstract.
Some sentences need to be revised according to specialized medical terms; for example
"ultrasound confirmed that the fetus had died in the uterus"
Intrauterine fetal demise was confirmed by ultrasound.
What was the vital sign of the patient in both admissions?
Please observe the order of the figures in the text. First, it has been mentioned in Figure 5, then
Figure 4.
What is the meaning of this sentence?
"Given that the patient was pregnant for the first time and had strong fertility requirements, the
surgical procedure involved laparoscopic vaginal combined hysterectomy, cervical duct lesion
resection, intraoperative uterine repair and reconstruction, and placement of a uterine drainage
tube"
Table number 1. Omit the journal column and add information such as the age of patients, G,
P,  and type of delivery.
Title: Minimally Invasive Treatment of Uterine Necrosis with Favorable Outcomes: An
uncommon case presentation and literature review
Version: 2 Date: 12 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
I would like to thank you for inviting me to review this manuscript. I read the article carefully.
While it is an interesting topic to review, some concerns lead me to recommend minor revisions
for this manuscript.
It seems that the author in the present case report focused more on the clinical presentation of
the patient than on its treatment.  My suggestion is to expand the treatment section by providing
more information about the type of antibiotic, the dose and the exact duration of its continuation
by injection or oral.  Also, it is important to mention the clinical course of the patient during the
treatment process (for example, how many days after the treatment did the disease subside?).
I believe that referring to the patient's race and ethnicity can also be important in a case report.
There are also minor concerns regarding English grammar, expression, and acronyms. So, I
strongly recommend that the paper be checked by a native English speaker or professional
English editing service before re-submission.
Title: Minimally Invasive Treatment of Uterine Necrosis with Favorable Outcomes: An
uncommon case presentation and literature review
Version: 8 Date: 03 Apr 2024
Reviewer's report:
Case report studies are valuable and transfer clinical experience. Please explain the following
comments.
1. The title should be stated more clearly, for example, it can be changed as follows:
Minimally Invasive Treatment of Uterine Necrosis with Favorable Outcomes: An uncommon
case presentation and literature review
2. Key words should be written in the abstract section based on the Mesh (Medical Subject
Headings).
3. In the text of the article, the place of the patient's visit (which hospital and city) should be
mentioned.
4. The gestational age should be written as weeks (instead of months).
5. What is meant by PCT test? be written extensively.
6. Have blood tests such as CBC Diff, clinical examination, or Systemic symptoms (such as
nausea, etc.) been checked, please bring them.
7. If there is any information about the delivery process such as the duration of labor, blood
tests, vital signs, please bring it.
8. The number of pulse should be written (Instead of the word tachycardia in the text).
9. Since the purpose of the study is to focus on providing a minimally invasive treatment, it
seems that the sentence related to the expression of leiomyosarcoma and its related image should
be removed in the entire text, because minimally invasive treatment in limyosarcoma may not be
reasonable or the treatment is very temporary, or if the authors have a different opinion, please
express it.
Title: The Effect of Ovarian Response Parameters and the Synergistic Effect of Assisted
Reproduction of Poor Ovarian Response Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma: Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis
Version: 1 Date: 21 Jan 2024
Reviewer's report:
Dear colleagues
Thank you very much For diverting this interesting article to me for peer reviewing.
The Effect of Ovarian ResponseParameters andthe Synergistic Effect of Assisted Reproduction
of Poor Ovarian Response Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma: Systematic Reviewand Meta-
Analysis
----------------------------------------------
Honestly as much as the Methodology and results with double checking of the authors raw data
I couldn't find any defect to be reviewed. I agree totally with results and conclusions reached
by the author. Accordingly, as far as my humble opinion I give my full consent for publishing
this article.
Title: The Effect of Ovarian Response Parameters and the Synergistic Effect of Assisted
Reproduction of Poor Ovarian Response Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma: Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis
Version: 1 Date: 21 Jan 2024
Reviewer:  Mohammed dakhil Al Rekabi
Reviewer's report:
Dear author;
I have thoroughly read the manuscript, I is well organized and highly informative and seems
that you put a great effort in reviewing all these articles and put them in this great review.
Thanks!
Title: The Effect of Ovarian Response Parameters and the Synergistic Effect of Assisted
Reproduction of Poor Ovarian Response Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma: Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis
Version: 1 Date: 18 Feb 2024
Reviewer:  Rihab Abbas Ali
Reviewer's report:
dear authors here are few notice about your manuscript:
1. In the line 48 what do you mean by POSEIDON standard?
2. In line 53 the (an) before vital must be (a).
3. In line 54 and 55 I think the sentence (usually characterized by Anti-Mueller Hormone (AMH)
and the number of antral follicles) is incomplete. Recheck please.
4. In line 61 add space between the two words (theresults), same in line 218 (butthe).
5. line 157 delete the repeated (the) before (information).
In general, the study need to be revised for some grammar issues, otherwise it is a promising
study and important subject to study.
Title: The Effect of Ovarian Response Parameters and the Synergistic Effect of Assisted
Reproduction of Poor Ovarian Response Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma: Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis
Version: 4 Date: 07 Apr 2024
Reviewer's report:
Comments to the author
Thank you for the opportunity to review the article titled: The Effect of Ovarian Response
Parameters and the Synergistic Effect of Assisted Reproduction of Poor Ovarian Response
Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis, aims to explore the efficacy and safety of PRP injection
on POR. They have reached a conclusion that PRP may have the potential to improve pre-
assisted reproductive indicators in POR patients, increase the success rate of in vitro fertilization-
embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in POR patients, and improve embryo quality, and may be beneficial
to the pregnancy outcome.
Comments:
Introduction:
1- Line 42: Delete the sentence ovarian reserve and poor ovarian no need to do repetition.
2- Line 43: Delete the sentence and POR no need to repetition.
3- Line 49: Add the year of POSEIDON introduction.
4-Line 63-65: Add the reference.
Title: Prevalence, Pattern and Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence Amongst Female
Undergraduates in Abia State, Nigeria; Public Health Implications
Version: 1 Date: 18 Dec 2023
Reviewer:  Chinedu A. Idoko
Reviewer's report:
METHODOLOGY
The Methodology and content need be more organized. The authors talked about the Study
Population, not yet fully dealing with it, jumped into inclusion criteria and even then, did not
exhaust it. What was the exclusion criteria?
Sampling Technique: The Samling Technique utilized in this study is scanty. The approach to
choice of Undergraduate Students  of ABSU and MOUAU as the study group/ population need
be more clearly explained.
How was the students to be studied in these institutions delineated. What kind of Sampling
Method/ Methods were used? An effort was done to this respect but does not suffice.
DISCUSSION
There was an effort to compare the study to previous and similar studies by the authors  but in a
very ambiguous way; there were references to unnecessary details making the read uninteresting.
The authors could do a better job in rearranging and summarising their intent.