Reviewer’s report
Title: 
Pyosalpinx due to Cronobacter sakazakii in an elderly woman: a case
report
Version: 
0 
Date: 
10 Oct 2020
Reviewer's report:
GENERAL COMMENTS: This is a good case report which will add to the body
of knowledge in improving women's health particularly in gynaecological
practice.
Title: The title is good except for the fact that the "literature review" added to the
title was not robust enough in the manuscript proper. 
Abstract: The abstract was well written and with a proper word count.
Background: A good background to the case report was provided.
Case Presentation: With the speculation that the oral cavity was the most
common route of infection for C. Sakazakii infection, the author was silent about
the dietary habit of the patient especially with her likely vulnerability to this
organism. 
Discussion: Regarding the review of literatures, effort should be made on
highlighting the relevance of the antibiotic therapy especially in those cases of
C. Sakazakii who subsequently survived. This may help in providing knowledge
in subsequent management of these patients with respect to efficacy of
antibiotics and response to C. Sakazakii.
Authors Contribution: There should be a consistency in the presentation of the
initials of the co-authors to avoid any ambiguity. For instance, TK vs KT as was
outlined in the manuscript.
Meanwhile, the contributions of the co-author: Tomokumi Nagai with email:
tomokumi0309@yahoo.co.jp was not outlined in the manuscript.
Concluding Remarks: Overall, this is a good case report. With a more robust
review of the literatures on this subject matter, this will certainly provide a
wealth of knowledge to the practice of gynaecology.
Thank you.
Publons Reviewer Recognition
. Springer Nature can send verification of this
review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would
like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below.
Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal,
and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted
to Publons after the final decision on the manuscript has been made. If you have
already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review
and update your profile 
as per your settings and their policy. If you are not
registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to
register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new
profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata
for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the
sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as
a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have
registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please
find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy
https://publons.com/about/terms
No
Declaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following
questions:
1
. 
Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or
salary from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially
from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
2
. 
Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way
gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now
or in the future?
3
. 
Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the
content of the manuscript?
4
. 
Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organization that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of
the manuscript?
5
. 
Do you have any other financial competing interests?
6
. 
Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this
paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing
interests' below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
I declare that I have no competing interests.
Reviewer Publication Consent.
 I agree for my report to be made available
under an Open Access Creative Commons CC-BY License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
) if this manuscript is accepted for
publication. Any comments that I do not wish to be included in the published
report have been included as confidential comments to the editor, which will not
be published.
If you are not happy for us to publish this report, please contact the editorial
office before completing the review.
If you wish, you can include your name in your published report. Please note
you must decide whether to include your name at the start of the process and
confirm this decision whenever prompted. If you change your decision later, we
will not be able to publish your name.
I agree to the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license; please 
do not
 publish my name
with my report. (default)
Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use
of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence
presented?
Yes
Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?
Yes
Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?
Yes
Is the presentation of the work clear?
Yes
Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free
from apparent manipulation?
Yes