JerMa88/BMC_Womens_Health_Peer_Reviews huggingface dataset:
Title: Implementation strategies, facilitators, and barriers to scaling up and sustaining post
pregnancy family planning, a mixed-methods systematic review
Version: 2 Date: 02 May 2023
Reviewer's report:
Dear Authors,
I have recently had the opportunity to re-examine your manuscript, and I appreciate the effort
that you have put into your research. However, I have noticed that some of the concerns I raised
in my previous review have not been fully addressed.
In particular, I remain concerned about the clarity and concision of the manuscript. It is essential
that policymakers and family planning service planners can readily understand and apply the
findings and recommendations of your study. Therefore, I strongly suggest that you consider
a rewrite that focuses on brevity and clarity, while reducing unnecessary details. This would
involve streamlining the text by removing superfluous information and jargon and organizing it
in a logical and concise manner to highlight key findings and recommendations in a clear and
accessible format.
I also suggest that you even consider splitting the manuscript into two separate articles to address
each of the two objectives more effectively. This approach would enable you to provide a more
focused and targeted analysis of your research, which may improve the overall quality of your
work.
Furthermore, I would like to reiterate my concern regarding the inclusion of unpublished
studies in your systematic review. While unpublished studies may occasionally be relevant
to a systematic review, their inclusion should be done with caution and only under specific
circumstances where their inclusion is necessary and justifiable. In light of this, I would
recommend that you do not include unpublished studies in your analysis unless there is a
compelling reason to do so.
I appreciate your dedication and hard work on this project, and I look forward to seeing the
revised manuscript.
Sincerely,
Title: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 14-year-old girl: a case report and
literature review
Version: 1 Date: 29 Apr 2023
Reviewer's report:
In my opinion, the analyzed topic is interesting enough to attract the readers’ attention. This
study reports the first pediatric case of ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in China.
I think that the abstract of this article is very clear and well structured.
Maybe, since the case is very particular,  possible pre-operative indexes should be considered
in order to avoid surgical complications . Furthermore, because of the rarity of the case,
postoperative outcomes should be taken into accont. In particular, I suggest these articles to get
deeper in the topic PMID: 35343352 and The role of preoperative frailty assessment in patients
affected by gynecological cancer: a narrative review. Ottavia D’Oria, Tullio Golia D’Auge,
Ermelinda Baiocco, Cristina Vincenzoni, Emanuela Mancini, Valentina Bruno, Benito Chiofalo,
Rosanna Mancari, Riccardo Vizza, Giuseppe Cutillo, Andrea Giannini Vol. 34 (No. 2) 2022
June, 76-83 doi: 10.36129/jog.2022.34. Figures are very interesting. Because of these reasons,
the article should be revised and completed. Considered all these points, I think it could be of
interest for the readers and, in my opinion, it deserves the priority to be published after minor
revisions.
Title: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 14-year-old girl: a case report and
literature review
Version: 1 Date: 05 May 2023
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses a testable research
question(s) (brief or other article types: is there a clear objective)?
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with technical rigor to allow
confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
No - there are minor issues
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Is the current version of this work technically
sound? If not, can revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Well written and described rare scenario.
REQUESTED REVISIONS:
There is nothing totally incorrect; however, the authors go into quite a discussion about
management, prognosis, etc. Mucinous tumours are very different than serous and generalized
statements are not very accurate or helpful. Staging is another issue.
I would suggest the authors consider either the addition of a gyn. oncologist for such details,
recommendations, etc., or consider leaving out a lot of the clinical recommendations and data.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
As detailed earlier. A lot of the clinical issues with stage, prognosis, treatment could be much
improved with an oncologist's input. Mucinous tumours are VERY different than serous, for
example"
Title: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 14-year-old girl: a case report and
literature review
Version: 5 Date: 19 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
I wanted to thank the authors for making the requested changes and thus broadening and
clarifying the discussion. Thanks to these modifications the article is much more flowing and
clearer and that's why it is deserves the priority to be published
Title: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 14-year-old girl: a case report and
literature review
Version: 5 Date: 22 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
- Please give more detail about techniques of removed large ovarian tumor with intact capsule
via single port laparoscopic surgery.
- CA-125 is less likely rising in mucinous ovarian tumor.
- Base on previous study from Morice P, et al. 2019, primary mucinous ovarian cancer is
quite rare due to 50 to 70% of  initially ovarian tumor classified as primary ovarian mucinous
carcinomas were metastases from other sites. (Morice P, Gouy S, Leary A. Mucinous ovarian
carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1256-66.)
- Details of pathological, immunohistochemical investigations and a comprehensive workup
(colonoscopy , upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, mammogram) should be reported to rule out
an occult primary cancer.
Title: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 14-year-old girl: a case report and
literature review
Version: 5 Date: 23 Jun 2023
Reviewer:  Daniel Belema Fekene
Reviewer's report:
The analyzed topic is interesting enough to attract the readers’ attention. This study reports the
first pediatric case of ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in China. I think that the abstract
of this article is very clear and well structured if you correct the minor comment below
Abstract
Case presentation
1. Tumor marker levels were within normal limit,……………… it’s  better to put the number
to easily understand
Background
Case presentation
2. The results of complete hemogramin addition to liver and kidney function tests and
coagulation profile were also normal……………… put the result rather than saying normal
Title: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 14-year-old girl: a case report and
literature review
Version: 6 Date: 13 Jul 2023
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the Manuscript titled “Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a
14-year-old girl: a case report and literature review”, topic interesting enough to attract readers'
attention
The quality of the manuscript has improved thanks to the changes made. I think it could be of
interest to the readers and, in my opinion, it deserves the priority to be published.
Title: Women with disabilities’ experiences of intimate partner violence: A qualitative study
from Sweden
Version: 1 Date: 12 Apr 2023
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for the opportunity to offer feedback. I enjoyed learning more women with
disabilities’ experiences of intimate partner violence. It is obvious to me that you have done
lots of work on this manuscript. It is quite an undertaking to pull together all the necessary
information for a research manuscript. I hope you find my comments helpful.
Below are a few additional comments:
-This is a very interesting topic. I applaud you for offering a new perspective.
- The opening paragraphs of the manuscript could do more to justify the focus on WWD in
Sweden.
-The author did try to use the introduction contextualize the problem in relation to published
research/reports, but the aim of the manuscript is not stated until page 3. Please create an
introduction and background section.
- Whenever a new term is used, the definition should immediately follow. For instance, please
define IPV immediately after you use the term.
-In the introduction, are you referring to women in a heterosexual relationship? Please clarify.
-Line 111 states “Generally, in Sweden, we know little about the IPV experiences of WWDs.”
Are these women in heterosexual relationships?
- Line 135 references “PATH,” please give the readers more information about PATH.
-Line 143: “this study’s aim was to explore women with disabilities’ perceptions and experiences
of being victims/survivors of intimate partner violence” please clarify if this is in Sweden.
-Did a theory guide this study?
- A rationale for the study inclusion/exclusion criteria should be provided. There are conceptual
reasons to limit the sampling frame, but this decision needs to be explained and citations
provided.
-Were incentives provided? The incentive structure needs to be more fully explained.
-Was the semi-structured interview guide pilot tested?
- Were field notes made during and/or after the Interviews?
- The process of the interpretive analysis was generally well described, but additional specifics
about the coding process are needed. For example, how were discrepancies between coders
resolved?
-How was data saturation achieved?
-How was trustworthiness/rigor of the data established?
- Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction?
- A little more analysis/synthesis is needed throughout the presentations of results, which at
present is largely descriptive. Some suggestions:
-Topic sentences should be fleshed out so readers can follow the interpretations that are being
made
-There was considerable variation in the level of detail and interpretation across various sets of
results. It is easier for readers when findings are present them at a similar level of description/
analysis.
- The discussion does a good job discussing specific findings in light of the literature reviewed in
the manuscript. Throughout the discussion, more could be done to help readers grasp the novel
contributions of the study.
- About 1/3 of the references are over 10 years old. Please try to use references from within
the last 10 years.
Title: Women with disabilities’ experiences of intimate partner violence: A qualitative study
from Sweden
Version: 1 Date: 28 Apr 2023
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for en interesting article reporting on the experiences of women with disabilities
exposed to intimate partner violence.
I have some suggestions which I think may improve the quality of the manuscript and its
readability.
Abstract: Start with IPV in general and gather all information before continuing with IPV against
women with disabilities. Use whole sentences in all parts of the abstract. A theme does not
discuss participants' experiences but it may describe, illuminate, reveal...
Methods: Some parts of the method section are repetitive, especially information on RTA occurs
three times (at the beginning, in the analysis section and in the methodological consideration
section.
A section about the epistemiological standpoint the authors claim to apply, is missing. How
is constructivism used in this study? This framework should be explained in the methodology
section and should be used to illuminate the findings in the discussion section.
The methodological consideration section is lengthy and reveals only the strengths of the study,
not the limitations. E.g. how do the multiple and very different disabilities (cognitive impairment
and hearing impairment) of the participants influence on the study's findings?
Result section: It does not seem necessary to explain the meaning of the themes in the beginning
of this section. The reader has already received this information in the abstract and all the themes
are elaborated later on in the result section. It would be better to start every theme with the
authors' presentation of the participants' experiences rather than starting with several quotes .
The sentence in line 372 - 375 is not a finding but an interpretation of the authors and should be
moved to the discussion section. The quotes in line 390 to 396 do not seem to be good enough
illustrations of the content in this theme. Consider altering the name of the theme in line 434 -
(can hurdles be survived)? The quote in line 440 -443 has much of the same content as the text
in line 465-467 and this should be coordinated.
Discussion section: harming the children in order to harm the women line 575-576 seems to be
a new finding that i could not see in the finding section.
Language editing of the whole manuscript is needed. A lot of sentences are very long and
difficult to read. Some wording and expressions should be altered, e.g. godman (legal guardian?),
surviving an abusive relationship's hurdles... Several places the phrase, "to mention a few..." has
been used. I think it would be better to remove these phrases.
Title: Women with disabilities’ experiences of intimate partner violence: A qualitative study
from Sweden
Version: 4 Date: 05 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for your  revision of the manuscript and the detailed answers to our comments. In my
opinion you have revised the manuscript in line with our suggestions. I have only some minor
suggestions concerning the readability of the article:
Line 47 revise: "and its challenging to prove its occurrence"
Line 67- 68 revise: "one such group is women with disabilities..." (one such group represent
women...?)
Line 154-155: Consider use of the present tense in the whole sentence "This was a qualitative
study, using in-depth interviews...
Line 155-158: Revise the sentence, shorten it or divide it: "The study adopted a constructivist
epistemological standpoint—which recognizes that knowledge is shaped by social and cultural
contexts and researchers own perspectives can influence data interpretation and that the reality
is not fixed but rather is shaped by our own perceptions and experience.."
Line 158-159: Revise: We acknowledged our own subjectivity and works  (what do you mean
with works?)
Line 195-196: Revise: "RTA is a theoretically flexible interpretive approach to qualitative data
analysis that facilitates the analysis..." (a well known and recognized analysis method  will
always facilitate the analysis if the researchers are familiar with it).
Line 268: Revise: "we had limitations in the study.." (the study has limitations...)
Line 270-271: Revise: "to capture the experiences of women with intersecting oppressions from
an intersectional perspective, such as ..."
Line 607-610: Revise the sentence below, it is very long and blends different perspectives of
the recent study and another study). "...these were typical descriptions of how relationships
should be, especially from women who had experienced psychological abuse, some of them like
blaming self, similar to a study where older women combined different strategies to manage and
survive abusive experiences (53)".
Line 623: Revise:..."emphasize the need for a more responsible and proactive services..."
Line 626: Consider change "situations of vulnerability"? ( vulnerability of women with
disabilities?)
Line 627: ...revamped..."This is unclear, an explanation is needed: do such interventions exist
and why don' t they fit, or do you mean that such interventions should be developed?
Line 637: Revise: "The study also found...." (Better: we found, the results of the study showed....)
Line 640: It is unclear what you mean with "questioning their experiences..." (does it mean that
the women reflected on their experiences / sought for alternative solutions?)
Title: Women with disabilities’ experiences of intimate partner violence: A qualitative study
from Sweden
Version: 4 Date: 11 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
The authors have addressed most of my concerns adequately.  I was however surprised by their
response to my  remark number 6 about the lack of an interview guide. They state that this is
because the study is part of a larger data collection. This is not mentioned in the manuscript
as far as I can see. Is this  study a secondary analysis of data collected for another study? I
think it is perfectly ok to use the same data set to answer multiple questions but I think it should
be mentioned in the manuscript. As I understand your response you realised during the time
of data analysis rather than during data collection that the current reserach questions could be
answered within the study. If this is the case, this has implications, e.g., where the recruitement
of participants and the number of pariticpants adequate for this reserach questions? And it also
makes it even more important to include the interview guide, as the questions asked is likely to
have affected the asweres, i.e., where all relevant questions pertaining to the aim of your study
asked?
Again, I don't think it is a problem to use the same data set for multiple manuscripts, but it should
be elaborated on in the manuscript as it might have affected the results. And I really think the
interview guide should be added as a supplementary file so that it is possible to fully understand
the context of the study and the interviews conducted.
Title: Predictors of quality of life and mental health in breast cancer survivors in Northern Iran
Version: 1 Date: 28 Apr 2023
Reviewer:  Khadijeh Hatamipour
Reviewer's report:
1. Explain more about how to choose samples.
2. Why both random and convenience?
3. Briefly explain about the questionnaires and do not leave separate titles.
4. This is not a limitation (other women from different cities also visited this hospital ).
5. Write a suggestion for other research.
6.   In our  study      be corrected:     in this study
Title: Predictors of quality of life and mental health in breast cancer survivors in Northern Iran
Version: 1 Date: 12 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
In the implementation method section, the type of analysis should be briefly mentioned.
Keywords should be based on mesh.
Edit natively.
Some paragraphs in the introduction are long.
The importance of the need to edit the study based on the results of several studies.
The sample size is low compared to the type of study.
Edit the discussion again.
The references should be corrected according to the journal format.
It is preferable not to use old references.
Title: Association between the number of pregnancies and cardiac target organ damages: a cross-
sectional analysis of data from the KoRean wOmen’S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE)
Version: 0 Date: 16 Mar 2023
Reviewer's report:
Article Reviewed:
Hack-Lyoung Kim et al. (2023). Association between the number of pregnancies and cardiac
target organ damages: a cross- sectional analysis of data from the KoRean wOmen’S chest pain
rEgistry (KoROSE).
The article “Association between the number of pregnancies and cardiac target organ damages: a
cross- sectional analysis of data from the KoRean wOmen’S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE)” by
Hack-Lyoung Kim et al. (2023) aims to explore whether number of pregnancies affect cardiac
target organ damage (TOD) in middle-aged women. As indicators of cardiac TOD, the extent
of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) and LV
septal annular (e') velocity were assessed.
While there were two study groups, women having had 3 or more pregnancies and those with
less than 3 pregnancies, it would be more interesting and meaningful if nulliparity group is added
in Table 1 and 2.
I also think the  result of the risk of parity for TOD compared to nulliparity group is also
interesting.
Because the proportion of patients with hypertension was significantly higher in the group of
more than 3 pregnancies, if possible, including family history of hypertension, diabetes and
dyslipidemia in data would be meaningful to evaluate the importance of predisposing factors
on cardiac TOD other than number of pregnancies, even within the same group with the same
number of pregnancies.
Because this study only focused on women with chest pain who have gone through invasive
CAG, it is questionable whether the result could be extended to general population of women.
In the future, it would be meaningful to perform analysis on women with chest pain who have
not gone through invasive CAG, in order to determine whether number of pregnancies is still
an important factor even for women with clinically mild cardiac condition.
As the authors mentioned in the discussion, the major limitation of this study is that factors
such as socioeconomic status, lifestyle, environmental factors, and pregnancy associated
complications were not taken into account because of the lack of corresponding data in the
registry.
On the other hand, even after adjusting for age and cardiovascular risk factors such as
hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, the number of pregnancies seems to be positively
associated with the prevalence of cardiac TOD.
Given that, as this study has proven independent association between the number of pregnancies
and cardiac TOD, this article makes a meaningful contribution into the field, so I recommend
publishing this article, after consideration of supplementing data on nulliparity group in the
tables.
Title: Association between the number of pregnancies and cardiac target organ damages: a cross-
sectional analysis of data from the KoRean wOmen’S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE)
Version: 0 Date: 10 Apr 2023
Reviewer:  Jien-Jiun Chen
Reviewer's report:
The authors found in women with chest pain undergoing invasive CAG, higher number of
pregnancies was associated with multiple cardiac TOD. Parity information should be checked
when assessing a woman’s cardiovascular risk.
I thought this was an important issue for promoting women's health, esp. in developing contry
where multiparities were still very common.
The baseline inequalities, like age, DM, HTN, (all showed signficant differece) precludeds
current conclusion.  I would suggest the authors do prosensity score analysis to adjust baselines
to get firm conclusions.
The authors should also check the statistics, for example:
Hemoglobin, g/dL 12.6±1.3 12.8±1.2 0.009, this was obviously not correct
Title: Association between the number of pregnancies and cardiac target organ damages: a cross-
sectional analysis of data from the KoRean wOmen’S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE)
Version: 3 Date: 27 May 2023
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors,
I am delighted to see the revised version of this paper.
I have checked the supplementary tables given with additional analysis on nulliparity group.
Owing to the small sample size of women in the nulliparity group, I understand your decision
to group study patients by nulliparity vs. one or more pregnancies in the supplementary data.
However, because comparison of cardiac TOD parameters of women with lower number of
pregnancies and women who have never been pregnant was not made in this paper, I suggest
adding this comment in the limitations part, as it is also mentioned in the Clinical implications
part in the Discussion section that results of previous studies suggest that “lower number of
pregnancies have a cardiovascular protective effect in women when compared to women who
have never been pregnant.” Other than that, this paper seems ready to be published.