Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Prevalence of Female sexual dysfunction in allied health workers: A cross -sectional pilot 
study in a tertiary hospital in Singapore  
 
Version: 1 Date: 27 Apr 2018  
 
Reviewer: Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
Please include all comments for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annotated versions of manuscripts, graphs, 
supporting materials or other aspects of your report which cannot be in cluded in a text format.  
 
This is an important area of study i.e. female sexual dysfunction that is often under researched in 
Asian countries. However, a few methodological limitations and analysis made this study limited 
the study findings and  interpreta tions.  
Firstly, there is a sampling bias as it is purposive and convenience. For example, this might lead 
to those who could have FSD more inclined to participate hence may explained the high 
prevalence. I suggest for the authors to discuss the relevant s teps undertook to overcome these 
biases while maintaining anonymity and confidentiality.   
 
Secondly, the results need to be presented in a manner that shows the association between the 
different variables and those with FSD and those without FSD. Table 2 should include columns 
including independent variables, FSD vs non -FSD group, significant statistics including p values, 
confidence intervals and relevant test scores. The tables need to follow the journal's format.  
 
With a revised analysis, further discu ssion of the findings could lead to better discussion; 
including looking at other variables that might be confounders for these associations for example 
the partners factors including that could explain better some of the findings.  
 
 
 
   
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
No 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an  
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further  
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I recommend addi tional statistical review  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscr ipt: 
 
Acceptable  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an  
organisation that may  in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this  
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose  
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either n ow or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds  or has applied for patents relating t o the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing int erests' 
below.  If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted f or publication, my named report  
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors'  
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons  
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments  
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments  
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal