Reviewer’s report
Title: 
Women’s empowerment and child growth faltering in Ethiopia: evidence
from the Demographic and Health Survey.
Version: 
1 
Date: 
05 Jan 2021
Reviewer's report:
Dear Sir
Thank you to give me the opportunity to review the revised version of the article
entitled (Women's empowerment and child growth faltering in Ethiopia:
evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey).
The authors found that attitude to violence, social independence, and decision-
making were the three domains of women's empowerment that were associated
with child growth faltering. They also concluded that empowering the women
clearly has a potential impact on decreasing stunting and underweight in a
rapidly developing country like Ethiopia. It is extremely important for
policymakers and health professionals to consider women's empowerment in this
unique context to improve nutritional outcomes for children and alleviate growth
faltering.
It is an interesting article. Authors used informative title and clear keywords.
In the introduction, authors identified the indicators to measure women's
empowerment, decision-making at the household and women's attitude towards
violence. However, the Survey-based Women's emPowERment (SWPER) index
also recommends including women's social independence, as an indicator of
women's empowerment. In addition, authors explained that there is a gap of
knowledge regarding the women's empowerment in Ethiopian and this explains
why their study was designed.
In the methodology section, authors mentioned the data source, outcome variable
and exposure variable (SWPER index, violence against women, social
independence, and decision-making scores). Also, authors mentioned the
statistical methods used to analyze their data and to get the study results.
In the results section, authors presented the weighted descriptive statistics,
descriptive statistics of domains of women's empowerment and association of
women's empowerment and child growth faltering (supported by their tables and
supplementary tables).
In the discussion section, authors presented their findings and compared it with
other findings. In addition, they mentioned the strength and the limitations of the
study.
Authors presented clear conclusion reflecting their results and they used relevant
references.
Finally, the manuscript is an interesting one and can be accepted for publication
after the authors correction without any suggested changes from my side. 
Regards 
Publons Reviewer Recognition
. Springer Nature can send verification of this
review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would
like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below.
Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal,
and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted
to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at
Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile
as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you
will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be
able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the
Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you
as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For
example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile
published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help
editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in
Publons’ privacy policy 
https://publons.com/about/terms
Yes
Declaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following
questions:
1
. 
Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or
salary from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially
from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
2
. 
Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way
gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now
or in the future?
3
. 
Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the
content of the manuscript?
4
. 
Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organization that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of
the manuscript?
5
. 
Do you have any other financial competing interests?
6
. 
Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this
paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing
interests' below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
I that I have no competing interests
Reviewer Publication Consent.
 I agree for my report to be made available
under an Open Access Creative Commons CC-BY License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
) if this manuscript is accepted for
publication. Any comments that I do not wish to be included in the published
report have been included as confidential comments to the editor, which will not
be published.
If you are not happy for us to publish this report, please contact the editorial
office before completing the review.
If you wish, you can include your name in your published report. Please note
you must decide whether to include your name at the start of the process and
confirm this decision whenever prompted. If you change your decision later, we
will not be able to publish your name.
I agree to the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license; please 
do not
 publish my name
with my report. (default)
Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use
of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence
presented?
Yes
Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?
Yes
Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?
Yes
Is the presentation of the work clear?
Yes
Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free
from apparent manipulation?
Yes