JerMa88/BMC_Womens_Health_Peer_Reviews huggingface dataset:
Title: Temporal trends and projections of gynecological cancers in China, 2007-2030
Version: 2 Date: 18 Jan 2023
Reviewer's report:
The manuscript investigated trends and projections of gynecological cancers in China,
2007-2030. This manuscript is interesting and well-written. Still, some major and minor
comments are given below. I am happy to re-review it in the next round.
1.  Methods – Joinpoint regression program: “Temporal trends of the cancer cases, incidence,
deaths, and mortality from 2007 to 2016 were calculated by JoinPoint Regression Program.
The analysis identifies periods with distinct linear slopes that can be connected by join-points
denoting trend changes and determine the number of join-points that should be used to best
describe trends in the data[1].”
As the authors stated, the use of joinpoint regression is to identify the changes in trends of cancer
incidence or mortality. However, I do not find this result in the manuscript. Is there any change
in trends of cancer cases, incidence, deaths, and mortality from 2007 to 2016? If so, please report
it as a temporal trend that should reflect the most recent trends, if any. Some useful examples
of using joinpoint for trend analysis are below.
• 10.1002/ijc.33962
• https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1228
2.  Methods – Grey prediction model GM (1,1).
Please provide more detailed information about the grey prediction model.
Specifically, there are several questions below need to be answered.
The detailed formula?
Data input and output?
Application in cancer projections before?
The used software or statistical package?
Sensitivity analysis?
Performance of cancer projections in comparison with other well-known methods?
For example:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00090-1
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246076
Any assumptions and limitations?
3.   As population aging may be the main contribution to the increase of cancer burden. Please
provide some information and discussion on the Chinese population structure at the present and
in the future.
Title: Temporal trends and projections of gynecological cancers in China, 2007-2030
Version: 2 Date: 16 Mar 2023
Reviewer:  Yong Lyu
Reviewer's report:
The data in this paper come from the Chinese Cancer Registry Annual Report by the National
Cancer Center, which has a strong national representative, The subject matter of the article is
relatively novel, which can reflect the trend of the occurrence, development and death of cancer
in Chinese women to some extent. However, it is insufficient to describe the necessity of the
application of time prediction in the development of gynecological cancer, lack of comparison of
domestic and foreign research results on time prediction of gynecological cancer, and discuss the
influencing factors in the development of gynecological cancer in China too little. We suggest
that the author revise the article.
1.This article is mainly about the time prediction of cancer, the conclusion of the abstract should
not focus on how to prevent treatment.
2.The description of screening prevention in the second preamble is too much.
3.In line 18 on page 4, “194 males and 188 million females” is revised to “194 million males
and 188 million females” ; In line 1 and line 2 on page 6, “Peck” of the article is amended to
read "Peak".
4.The discussion part of this article mainly describes the current situation, trend and prevention
strategy of several gynecological cancers, but the necessity of predicting the time trend of cancer
and the possible causes affecting the change trend of gynecological cancers are not introduced.
Title: Effects of Different Physiotherapy Modalities on Insomnia and Depression in
Perimenopausal, Menopausal, and Post-menopausal Women: A Systematic Review
Version: 0 Date: 21 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
Overview and General Comments:
The current study is on a topic of relevance, novel, interesting and general interest to the readers
of the journal.  I found that the paper has been overall written reasonably, however, minor
revisions are required.
Few are recommended for this paper for publication as it stands. I ask that the authors specifically
address each comment in their responses.
1.   Title may be revised and only menopausal women can be added as includes perimenopause,
menopause, and post-menopausal duration.
2. Introduction is very short. The authors may add background and r ationale of the study.
2. Kindly check the whole manuscript for grammatical errors and typographical mistakes.
2. Kindly check the references once again for example reference 7 is not written as per the
guidelines.
Title: Effects of Different Physiotherapy Modalities on Insomnia and Depression in
Perimenopausal, Menopausal, and Post-menopausal Women: A Systematic Review
Version: 0 Date: 10 Apr 2023
Reviewer's report:
1. To my knowledge, the database should be more than 4.
2. Results should summarize the knowledge, not show all information of your selected papers
3. DIscussion should discuss why exercise can improve your variables. You can't just show
previous studies that have identified the results.
4. You followed the PICO model, however, you didn't follow it to describe your results and
your limitation.
Title: Factors associated with uptake of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine among school girls
aged 9-14 years in Lira City northern Uganda: A cross-sectional study
Version: 1 Date: 15 Mar 2023
Reviewer's report:
I think this paper is great and the authors have taken time to report their findings scientifically.
Suggestions are to pay attention to grammar and spacing in the whole text.
The tittle should be capitalised for the first words that are not prepositions.
Introduction
An inference to having section on Africa , then east Africa  ie what is happening then uganda
is key
methodology
A section on quality assurance is missing ie the validity and reliability of the tool and a possible
score of the cronbach alpha, a description on the validation process would be great and ability
to attach the tool as a supplementary material . The SPPS statistical software you used can get
you the reliability score of the tool
The discussion section needs to have a wider addition beyond just uganda but also a comparative
in the region and Africa ,  we would need to see what the finds generally imply  for the Uganda
and Africa or similar developing countries.
Title: The effect of chronic endometritis and treatment on patients with unexplained infertility
Version: 1 Date: 20 May 2023
Reviewer:  Giuseppe Gullo
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors,
I read with great interest the manuscript, which falls within the aim of this Journal. In my honest
opinion, the topic is interesting enough to attract the readers’ attention. Nevertheless, authors
should clarify some points and improve the discussion, as suggested below. Authors should
consider the following recommendations:
In my opinion you have to improve the paper refering to the updated literature wihin natraceutical
supplementation as inositols as well to how is important to have a good thyroid study and
to follow  the Neonatal Outcomes and Long-Term Follow-Up of Children Born from Frozen
Embryo after IVF .
i ALSO SUGGEST TO REFER TO THE PSYCOLOGICAL IMPILCATION IN THESE PTS
THAT UNDERGOING TO IVF TREATMENTS and how artificla intelligence can be helpfull
in their infertile pathway.
i SUGGEST TO READ AND CITE THESE ARTICLES
Myo-inositol: from induction of ovulation to menopausal disorder management
D-chiro-inositol induces ovulation in non-polycystic ovary syndrome (Pcos), non-insulin-
resistant young women, likely by modulating aromatase expression: A report of 2 cases
Inositols administration: further insights on their biological role
The Future Is Coming: Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Infertility Could Improve
Assisted Reproduction Outcomes—The Value of Regulatory Frameworks
Neonatal Outcomes and Long-Term Follow-Up of Children Born from Frozen Embryo, a
Narrative Review of Latest Research Findings
The Role of Cell and Gene Therapies in the Treatment of Infertility in Patients with Thyroid
Autoimmunity
Impact of assisted reproduction techniques on the neuro-psycho-motor outcome of newborns:
a critical appraisal
Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
Title: The effect of chronic endometritis and treatment on patients with unexplained infertility
Version: 1 Date: 30 May 2023
Reviewer:  Violante di Donato
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the Manuscript titled IIs “The effect of chronic endometritis and
treatment on patients with unexplained infertility" which falls within the aim of the Journal.
Although the manuscript can be considered already of good quality, I would suggest to take into
account the following recommendations:
- I suggest round of language revision, in order to correct few typos and improve readability;
- I would recommend to highlight and discuss novel pieces of evidence about the differences
outcomes of untreated and treated infertile women with Chronic Endometritis undergoing
assisted reproduction technology, especially considering the Plasma Cell Count and the effect
of different antibiotic therapies (authors may refer to: PMID: 31710184; PMID: 36140651).
Because of these reasons, the article should be revised and completed. Considering all these
points, I think it could be of interest to the readers and, in my opinion, it deserves the priority
to be published after minor revisions.
Title: The effect of chronic endometritis and treatment on patients with unexplained infertility
Version: 2 Date: 18 Jun 2023
Reviewer's report:
PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
Yes - the approach is appropriate
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
Yes - experiments and analyses were performed appropriately
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Yes - appropriate statistical analyses have been used in the study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Yes - current version is technically sound
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: I carefully evaluated the revised version of this manuscript.
The authors have performed the required changes, improving significantly the quality of the
paper.
Title: The effect of chronic endometritis and treatment on patients with unexplained infertility
Version: 2 Date: 19 Jun 2023
Reviewer:  Violante di Donato
Reviewer's report:
I read with great interest the Manuscript titled “The effect of chronic endometritis and treatment
on patients with unexplained infertility, topic interesting enough to attract readers' attention
The quality of the manuscript has improved thanks to the changes made. The methodology
is accurate, and conclusions are supported by data analysis. The discussions are clear and
comprehensive. References are relevant to the search.
Considering all these points, I think it could be of interest to the readers and, in my opinion, it
deserves the priority to be published.
Title: Pregnancy complications in last pregnancy and mothers’ long-term cardiovascular
mortality: does the relation differ from that of complications in first pregnancy? A population-
based study
Version: 2 Date: 28 Mar 2023
Reviewer's report:
I want to congratulate the authors with a well performed study. The manuscript is well written
and of high quality.
This is a study based on large population registers. The authors have outlined positive and
negative sides in an appropriate way.
The statistic examinations seem excellent.
The results are very interesting and original.
The figurs and the tables are adequate and easy to read.
I have only one minor comment:
Sentence page 9: "Also, risk associalted with complications occurring in the last pregnancy was
higher than that associated with complications in the first".  This sentence seems a bit unclear
to me.
Title: Combined oral antibiotics and intrauterine perfusion can improve in vitro fertilization and
embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis and repeated embryo
implantation failure
Version: 3 Date: 07 Apr 2023
Reviewer:  Giuseppe Gullo
Reviewer's report:
Dear authors,
I read with great interest the manuscript, which falls within the aim of this Journal. In my honest
opinion, the topic is interesting enough to attract the readers’ attention. Nevertheless, authors
should clarify some points and improve the discussion, as suggested below. Authors should
consider the following recommendations:
Manuscript should be further revised in order to correct some typos and improve style.
In my opinion you have to improve the paper refering in the text how endometritis is today an
unexpaleined problem may be dependent due a multifactory points.
I suggest you to refer how one of the possible tretments could be the injection of embryo culture
supernatant to the endometrial cavity and how tha artifical intelligence could be really helpfull in
this pts to better perform also the best tecnique as well do not forget the psychological variables
also in case of use of uterus device .
I suggest you to read and cite these papers:
Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review
Analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure complicated with
chronic endometritis
The Future Is Coming: Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Infertility Could Improve
Assisted Reproduction Outcomes—The Value of Regulatory Frameworks
Neonatal outcomes and long-term follow-up of children born from frozen embryo, a narrative
review of latest research findings.
From the maternal uterus to the “uterus device”? Ethical and scientific considerations on partial
ectogenesis.
Title: Combined oral antibiotics and intrauterine perfusion can improve in vitro fertilization and
embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis and repeated embryo
implantation failure
Version: 5 Date: 02 May 2023
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
No - there are minor issues
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
No - there are minor issues
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Not sure - I am not able to assess the statistics in this study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
Yes - the author's interpretation is reasonable
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
Probably - with minor revisions
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: The authors have addressed the issues raised. and made appropriate
changes. The revised manuscript is improved.
REQUESTED REVISIONS:
I am still unclear how the patients made their own choice for allocation of different treatment
regimens and the risk of bias remains high. I think the authors should address the risk of bias
more thoroughly and discuss the fact that the results may not in any way reflect the outcomes
of an RCT. An RCT does not need to be blinded.
ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/SUGGESTIONS:
A section addressing the risks of bias would be good to include the fact that it is retrospective,
explain the method of how the patients were identified, the relevance of the patients choosing
their own treatment and the fact that the conclusions probably have little validity with this kind
of study"
Title: Combined oral antibiotics and intrauterine perfusion can improve in vitro fertilization and
embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis and repeated embryo
implantation failure
Version: 6 Date: 08 May 2023
Reviewer's report:
"PEER REVIEWER ASSESSMENTS:
OBJECTIVE - Full research articles: is there a clear objective that addresses one or several
testable research questions? (Brief or other article types: is there a clear objective?)
Yes - there is a clear objective
DESIGN - Is the current approach (including controls and analysis protocols) appropriate for
the objective?
No - there are major issues
EXECUTION - Are the experiments and analyses performed with sufficient technical rigor to
allow confidence in the results?
No - there are major issues
STATISTICS - Is the use of statistics in the manuscript appropriate?
Not sure - I am not able to assess the statistics in this study
INTERPRETATION - Is the current interpretation/discussion of the results reasonable and not
overstated?
No - there are major issues
OVERALL MANUSCRIPT POTENTIAL - Has the author addressed your concerns sufficiently
for you to now recommend the work as a technically sound contribution? If not, can further
revisions be made to make the work technically sound?
No - manuscript has some fundamental flaw(s)
PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS:
GENERAL COMMENTS: I do not understand how the fundamental design of the study has
been overlooked and incorrectly described by the authors and when questioned about, they
say 'The patient's treatment plan was somewhat confused by our careless and inappropriate
presentation.' The correction does nothing to alleviate my fundamental concerns about the design
of this study.
The authors have decided not address the issue of bias in their paper and simply assert that their
'results are dependable'.
This is a pre-submission process that aims to help the authors optimise the chances of success
with submission to a journal of their choosing. I really have nothing more to add to the process
and I wish the authors luck with their submission to a journal.
REQUESTED REVISIONS:
Please see comments above"
Title: Combined oral antibiotics and intrauterine perfusion can improve in vitro fertilization and
embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis and repeated embryo
implantation failure
Version: 6 Date: 17 May 2023
Reviewer's report:
in the manuscript, there are still proof readings that have not been fixed
explain in the methodology how to control the confounding variables
It must be explained in detail, either in the characteristics or in the description of the statistical
test table used to obtain the P value
The manuscript is accepted with revision
Title: Combined oral antibiotics and intrauterine perfusion can improve in vitro fertilization and
embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis and repeated embryo
implantation failure
Version: 6 Date: 17 May 2023
Reviewer:  Houqiang Luo
Reviewer's report:
The authors have revised and answered all the questions according to the referees's concerns. In
this way, the revised manuscript can be accepted.
Title: The effect of music intervention in decreasing pain and anxiety during outpatient
hysteroscopy procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Version: 0 Date: 08 Jan 2023
Reviewer:  T Justin Clark
Reviewer's report:
Nice paper
Well conduced review and i support publication
i have tracked changes where i think the abstract could be improved and the bits own the results
that are not well explained
i do think the authors should discuss a little more the weaknesses / limitations of their study - in
particular the patient group - pre/ post menopausal, age etc - as these and other factors will be
confounders - also type of procedure (operative or diagnostic) and  type of music etc
Title: The effect of music intervention in decreasing pain and anxiety during outpatient
hysteroscopy procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Version: 0 Date: 13 Feb 2023
Reviewer's report:
Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to review this manuscript.
I congratulate the authors for the work done and the effort to plan and carry out a meta-analysis.
Below I will make some suggestions with the aim of improving the manuscript.
Abstract
1. There is no time to study or search at Methods.
Introduction
1. Because the study appeal to an international audience it should be emphasized the importance
of study well and should be explained why it is necessary good.
2. Mention to the statistics of hysteroscopy use.
3. Explain more about the mechanism of music.
4. I suggest creating a subsection at the end of the introduction in which the purpose and
objectives of the study are explained in more detail "present study".
Method
1. All authors (8 people) screened the studies and extracted the data. Really??
2. I suggest that add  the PICO of the study.
3. Mention to the number of studies found in each database.
Results
1. Add to the table 1 the location of study and mean or other information about pain and anxiety.
Discussion
1. The discussion does not discuss the results of this study well. Some studies presented in the
introduction are also repeated in the discussion. Please revise.
2. Compare and discuss the results of other studies with the results of your study. You just
mentioned the results of the other studies
3. You discussed Abdelhakim et al. study well. Please discuss some other studies like this one.
Title: The effect of music intervention in decreasing pain and anxiety during outpatient
hysteroscopy procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Version: 0 Date: 23 Apr 2023
Reviewer's report:
Thanks for giving me this opportunity to review this well-written study. This study evaluated
the effect of music intervention in decreasing pain and anxiety during outpatient hysteroscopy
procedure. The reporting followed the PRISMA statement. However, some concerns need to be
addressed before acceptance.
1.Are outpatient hysteroscopy and office hysteroscopy the same concept?
2.In the discussion section, although the author cited a large number of relevant literature, only
presented the results without comparative analysis!
3.Some of the references have incorrect formatting, please recheck.
Other parts of this study are acceptable.