Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Sexual motivations during the menopausal transition amo ng Iranian women: A qualitative 
inquiry  
 
Version: 1 Date: 04 Mar 2018  
 
Reviewer: Jane Ussher  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
This study examines sexuality in menopausal women living in Iran, drawing on the findings of 
interviews with women. It is an interesting paper, which makes a contribution to research in this 
area. Some clarification of a number of points, outlined below, w ould strengthen the paper.  
 
 
The socio -cultural context of sexuality is acknowledged in the discussion, but there is no 
discussion of how sex is constructed or regulated in Iran. Are women allowed to discuss sex? Is 
sexual pleasure expected for women? Do women have control over their reproductive and sexual 
bodies? These factors may influence participant responses. There is some examination of these 
factors in the discussion - it would be good to have this introduced up front.  
 
 
How were participants 'purposively selected'? How was the study described to women? Were 
interviews recorded and transcribed? How was menopausal status established?  
 
 
What is the 'conventional approach' for qualitative analysis? Outline the specific approach, with 
references. It looks to me like a thematic analysi s. 
 
 
The use of a table to illustrate coding is good.  
 
 
The results are presented in a very descriptive manner, with little analysis. However, there is 
good use of data to illustrate each of the themes.  
 
 
The discussion is good - and draws the findings togeth er in relation to previous research, and the 
social context of Iran.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to t he authors.  
 
No 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financial ly from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financi ally from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents  relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organiz ation that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
If you can answer no to all of th e above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted f or publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the au thors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under  an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be pu blished.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal