Reviewer’s report
Title: 
Associations of attitudes and social norms with experiences of intimate
partner violence among married adolescents and their husbands in rural Niger: a
dyadic cross-sectional study
Version: 
1 
Date: 
20 Aug 2019
Reviewer: 
Chuka Agunwa
Reviewer's report:
I must commend what I consider a very good manuscript. Please take note of the
following comments.
1. The first statement in the METHODS section is an appropriate justification of
the need for the study and should be included at the end of the BACKGROUND
section with a clear statement of 
what the research objectives were.
2. The method or calculation for the sample size needs to be explained in order
to prove adequate generalization of findings as well as promote reproduction of
the study.
3. In the regression tables, there is some failure to indicate what reference
variables were. This was provided when assessing if violence was socially
acceptable, but in many other variables such as wife's education,
whether quaranic school was attended etc, this was not done. It should only be
ignored if the journal specifically gave that instruction.
Are the methods appropriate and well described?
If not, please specify what is
required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Does the work include the necessary controls?
If not, please specify which
controls are required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?
If not,
please explain in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you
recommend an additional statistical review?
If an additional statistical review
is recommended, please specify what aspects require further assessment in your
comments to the editors.
I am able to assess the statistics
Quality of written English
Please indicate the quality of language in the
manuscript:
Acceptable
Declaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing
interests, considering the following questions:
1
. 
Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or
salary from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially
from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
2
. 
Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way
gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now
or in the future?
3
. 
Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the
content of the manuscript?
4
. 
Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organization that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of
the manuscript?
5
. 
Do you have any other financial competing interests?
6
. 
Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this
paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing
interests' below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
'I declare that I have no competing interests'
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name
will be included on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted
for publication, my named report including any attachments I upload will be
posted on the website along with the authors' responses. I agree for my report to
be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons CC-BY license
(
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
). I understand that any comments
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as
confidential comments to the editors, which will not be published.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal