Reviewer’ s report
Title: Vaginal repaired cesarean section diverticulum is beneficial in women with two prior
cesarean sections
Version: 0Date: 06 Sep 2019
Reviewer: Michal Pomorski
Reviewer's report:
This is a very interesting and well designed study on a topic of still growing importance all over
the world. The materials and methods section of the manuscript should include more detailedinformation about the ultrasonographic assessment of the cesarean section scar, likewise to thestudies listed below. Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, Zimmer M. Sonographicevaluation of surgical repair of uterine cesarean scar defects.J Clin Ultrasound. 2017Oct;45(8):455-460. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22449. Epub 2017 Feb 10.Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, Zimmer M. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of riskfactors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.Eur J Obstet GynecolReprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Aug 24.Also Irecommend the use of standardized terms for describing the parameters of the CS scar:Naji O,Abdallah Y , Bij De Vaate AJ, Smith A, et al. Standardized approach for imaging and measuringCesarean section scars using ultrasonography.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):252-9.doi: 10.1002/uog.10077. Review.
Are the methods appropriate and well described?
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Does the work include the necessary controls?
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.
YesAre the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.
YesAre you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an
additional statistical review?If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require furtherassessment in your comments to the editors.
I am able to assess the statistics
Quality of written English
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:
AcceptableDeclaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this
manuscript, either now or in the future?
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the
manuscript?
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that holds
or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' below.
If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
I declare that I have no competing interests
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named reportincluding any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors'responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative CommonsCC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). I understand that any commentswhich I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential commentsto the editors, which will not be published.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal