Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title:  Colposcopy Telemedicine: live versus static Swede score and accuracy in detecting 
CIN2+, a cross -sectional pilot study  
 
Version: 0 Date: 02 Apr 2018 
 
Reviewer:  Tod Aeby  
 
Reviewer’s report:  
 
Please include all comments for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annotated versions of manuscripts, graphs, 
supporting materials or other aspects of your re port which cannot be included in a text format.  
 
An interesting and well designed study that suggest that review of static images is, at least as 
good a live view.  This could have important implications for screening in low resource 
populations.  
 
 
Just t wo comments:  
 
1) consider including a table showing how the Swede score is obtained, since some of the readers 
might not be familiar with that particular scoring system  
 
2) In the comments section, the authors suggested that sensitivity and specificity would  be 
effected by the prevalence of CIN2+ in the population (line 290 -294).  In fact, these are inherent 
characteristics of the test and only PPV and NPV are affected by prevalence. This should be 
corrected in the text.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I am able to assess the statistics  
 
Quality of wri tten English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain o r lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no com peting interests.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made av ailable under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be  included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal