Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Prevalence of Female sexual dysfunction in allied health workers: A cross -sectional pilot 
study in a tertiary hospital in Singapore  
 
Version: 3 Date: 29 Jul 2019  
 
Reviewer: Jones Adjei  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
Thanks for the revisions. It seems my fourth comment from the initial review was not clear 
enough to the authors, and was therefore not satisfactorily addressed.  
 
The comment is below:  
 
"The methods section should include a discussion of the survey items u sed in constructing the 
outcome variable, and its various aspects (i.e., arousal, desire, lubrication, orgasm, etc.)"  
 
What was being implied was that the authors outline and describe the specific questions asked on 
the survey questionnaire as measurement for arousal, desire, lubrication, etc. For example, to 
measure arousal, respondents were asked this question(s) on the survey: "include survey item(s) 
here"; to measure desire, respondents were asked: "insert survey item(s)", etc.  
 
Knowing exactly what que stions were asked in this survey will help readers make more sense 
about the findings.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an  
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further  
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
I am able to assess the statistics  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscr ipt: 
 
Needs some language corrections before being published  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an  
organisation that may  in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this  
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose  
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either n ow or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds  or has applied for patents relating t o the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing int erests' 
below.  If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included  
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted f or publication, my named report  
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors'  
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons  
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments  
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments  
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal