Title: Association Between Triglyceride Levels and Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevalence in
Women: A Cross-Sectional Study of NHANES (1999–2018)
Version: 0 Date: 25 Dec 2024
Reviewer:  Ali B. Roomi
Reviewer's report:
Thank you for asking my #opinion #about #the #manuscript #entitled ##"Association Between
Triglyceride Levels and Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevalence in Women: Analysis of NHANES
Data from 1999 to 2018". #
#I believe that this manuscript should #be #major revision:#
I wanted to bring to your attention that there are several #articles #relevant to your article topic
that may be of #interest to you. You #might consider citing these references #to enrich your
work and #provide additional context. I have #included the links to these #articles below for
your #convenience #:#
# -#Roomi AB, Nori W, Hamed RM. Lower serum irisin levels are #associated with increased
osteoporosis and oxidative stress in #postmenopausal. Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular
Biology. ##2021 Apr;10(1):13# #.#
# -#Roomi, A.B., Nori, W. and Al-Badry, S.H., 2021. The value #of serum adiponectin in
osteoporotic women: does weight have #an effect?. Journal of obesity, 2021(1), p.5325813# #.#
# -#Roomi AB, AL-Salih RM, Ali SA. The effect insulin therapy #and metformin on
osteoporosis in diabetic postmenopausal Iraqi #women. Indian Journal of Public Health. 2019
Apr;10(4):1479# #.#
#-#Roomi AB, Mahdi Salih AH, Noori SD, Nori W, Tariq S. #Evaluation of bone
mineral density, serum osteocalcin, and #osteopontin levels in postmenopausal women
with type 2 #diabetes mellitus, with/without osteoporosis. Journal of #Osteoporosis.
2022;2022(1):1437061# #.#
#-#Roomi AB, AL-Salih RM, Ali SA. Impact metformin and #insulin therapy on parathyroid
hormone and 25 (OH) vitamin D #in diabetic post-menopausal Iraqi women. InJournal of
Physics: #Conference Series 2019 Jul 1 (Vol. 1279, No. 1, p. 012008). #IOP Publishing #.#
#-#
#[https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=qsWZh#0sAAA#AJ]. #
#[https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=572##097059##42]. #
#[https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-5550]#
Q1. It is very important to change and modify the title. the #title #is #not appropriate.#
Q2. Are the objectives and the rationale of the #study #clearly #stated? #
#Q3.# In the abstract, the research gap was not clearly #stated. #In #addition, the authors need
to rewrite the study #objectives #to be #more academic writing
#Q4. In the introduction, include the  #study's #significance #and #novelty. What makes the
study #different #from #the rest #and #what #does it add to the current #knowledge?#.#
Q5. In the introduction, the #authors #should #have #explained #the #purpose of this study and
#the #existing gaps #in #this field #and #explained why this study #was #conducted.#
#Q6. Are the methods clear and replicable? Do all the #results #presented to match the methods
described?#
Q7. If relevant are the results novel? Does the study #provide an #advance in the field? Is the
data plausible?#
Q8. References are relevant, correct, and #not #recent. #The #number #of #references should be
increased.# #please #add some #references. since this is a scientific #review, all the #sentences
need #to be supported with #references.#
This study is very beautiful. I liked the sequence #and #enjoyed #reading. Please add more
references on #similar #studies.#
#Q9. There are a lot of grammatical errors. #This #must #be #taken #care #of and addressed.#
#Q10. What are the limitations of the study?# A #description #of #limitations is missing at the
end of the #discussion #section.#