Reviewer’s report
Title: Intention to quit water pipe smoking among Iranian women: A qualitative directed content
analysis
Version: 1 Date: 11 Feb 2020
Reviewer: João Carlos Alchieri
Reviewer's report:
I reaffirm the appreciation of the aspects mentioned in the previous assessment. The answers offered by
the authors are relevant and compatible with the points highlighted in the reviewers' assessments. This
is a proposal to verify the reasons for the use and cessation of tobacco use by water pipes in Iranian
women based on the theory of planned action. The authors present current evidence, together with
references compatible with the proposal, justifying the problem in terms of public health and the
difficulty faced with the adoption of inappropriate health behaviors, supported mainly by the perception
of  values  and  cultural  contexts.  The  study is  strongly supported  by methodological,  ethical  and
technical aspects in conducting the sample and in carrying out the analyzes provided for in the initial
objectives. The data allow the reader to gain an understanding of the methodological process, an
understanding of the observed results and support the presented discussion.
Are the methods appropriate and well described?
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Does the work include the necessary controls?
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an
additional statistical review?
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further
assessment in your comments to the editors.
Not relevant to this manuscript
Quality of written English
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:
Acceptable
Declaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this
manuscript, either now or in the future?
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the
manuscript?
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that holds
or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?
6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' below.
If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
I declare that I have no competing interests
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors'
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons
CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments
to the editors, which will not be published.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal