Review for 10.1186/s12876-018-0874-z (2018)

Reviewer ’s report  
Title : Identification of risk factors for pancreatic pseudocy sts formation, intervention and 
recurrence: A 15 -year retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital in China  
 
Version: 0 Date: 24 Jul 2018  
 
Reviewer: Etem Alhan  
 
Reviewer's report:  
Please include all comm ents for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annotated versions of manuscripts, graphs, 
supporting materials or other aspects of your report which cannot be included in a text format . 
Please overwrite this text when adding your comments to the authors. Dear Authors,  
 
I reviewed the study"'''Identification of risk factors for pancreatic pseudocysts formation, 
intervention and  recurrence: A 15 -year retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital in China". The 
paper is a retrospective study but the study has a apprioriate case for the study about 5106.  
The study investıgated the ocuurence of pseudocyt, the formation of pseudocyt a nd the treatment 
of the cyst and risk factors of the cy st. The division of the cases , the investigation of the groups, 
the risk factor are very good detailed investigated. The results are very interesting and catchy. I 
enjoyed from the study. The results  are very good discussed.  
 
I think so that this paper can be publıshed on this journal  
 
sincerely  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects requ ire further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
I am able to assess the statistics  
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
Acceptable  
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financial ly from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the  
manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents re lating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
'I declare that I have no competing interests' below  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that  any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal