Review for 10.1186/s12876-018-0858-z (2018)

Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Suspected Drug -induced Liver Injury Associated with Iguratimod: A Case Report and  
Review of the Literature  
 
Version: 3 Date: 04 Apr 2018  
 
Reviewer: Rolf Teschke  
 
Reviewer's report:  
Please include all comments for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annotated versions of manuscripts, graphs, 
supporting materials or other aspects of your report which cannot be in cluded in a text format.  
Please overwrite this text when adding your comments to the authors.  
 
 
Revision is now fine, minor points suvh as typos and others should be considered before it is 
published:  
 
Enlishre - editing is suggested.  
 
Page 3 line 59 : sev ere; P 4 l 31 severe, also  better sentencce: She had severe jaundice and was 
not encephalopathic; P 4 l 42, delete : in her complete body; P 4 l 50: gamma -GT; P 5 l 14: 
delete sentence except blood culture, as other words are unclear; P6 l 14. levels; P7 l 9: delete: 
And;P 8 l 3: is caused. P6 l 14. levels; P7 l 9: delete: And; P 9 l 39: .. validated by cases with 
positive reexposure tests; P 9 l 39 ff: replace by: The original RUCAM of 1993 received an 
update in 2016[11]. The causal correlation....; P 11 l 12: constitute; P 11 l39 -45: delete the 
pathogenseis...; P 14, is abbreviation of CIOMS used in the text? Many typos in the references, 
including ref 1; ref 4 paper in Chinese? I guess regarding ref 12: Teschke R, Wolff A... check the 
other authors.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, p lease specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics i n the manuscript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
I am able to assess the statistics  
Quality  of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
Needs some language corrections before being published  
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questio ns: 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or sh ares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
4. Have you r eceived reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non -financial competing intere sts in relation to this paper?  
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
I declare that I have no competing interests.  
I agree to the open p eer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the aut hors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which  I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal