Review for 10.1186/s12876-019-0933-0 (2019)

Reviewer ’s report  
 
Title: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in a patient after all ogeneic hematopoietic stem cell 
transplantation  
 
Version: 2 Date: 20 Dec 2017  
 
Reviewer: Simon Harrison  
 
Reviewer's report:  
 
This is an interesting case tha t is quite well written except for a few typographical and 
grammatical errors which should be proof read by and person with English as a first language.  
 
 
Some further details of the case would be useful  
 
 
page 6 what was the details of HLA matching of the t wo transplants and the timing og 
engraftment should be detailed.  
 
 
Page 7 was the presumed engraftment syndrome treated with steroids? Was the ascites and liver 
dysfunction persistant for the whole time up until the ascetic tap was performed?  
I assume that the BO was treated, with what?, and that is why the serositis improved?  
 
 
Discussion, given that serositis in general is unusual I would have expected some discussion 
about the treatment, etiology and outcomes of this before a detailed discussion of  perito neal 
sclerosis  
 
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls  are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an  
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Needs some language corrections before being published  
 
 
 
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing in terests, considering the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, f ees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financial ly from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in t he future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to th e content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
 
6. Do y ou have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have  no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
none 
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understan d that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted f or publication, my named repor t 
including any attachments I upload will be  posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be in cluded as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal