Review for 10.1186/s12876-020-01266-3 (2020)

Reviewer’ s report
Title: Pancreaticoduodenectomy for a primary duodenal capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC)
-rearranged sarcoma with severe bleeding: A case report
Version: 0Date: 25 Feb 2020
Reviewer: Abhishek Katakwar
Reviewer's report:
1. under abstract "Tarry stool" is not a scientific word rather "Malena" is suitable as used in main
manuscript. also instead of mentioning "more patient" in conclusion may i recommend "moreresearch".2.Your manuscript require major language refining and brevity correction along withusage of same tense for whole manuscript.3.case presentation: line 12 author mentioned aboutbleeding was controlled from "tumor" using endoscopic methods than why was he dischargedwithout making definitive diagnosis or you want to modify your statement ,also if tumor was notvisible during haemostasis then why there was no check endoscopy done before discharging him.line 22 is it "papilla" or 'ampulla".4. Why PET CT was not done during perioperative period.5.Final discussion: Line 6 "gastriintestinal" should be gastrointestinal. it is just to bring it in to thenotice of author , there are many such typo errors.
Are the methods appropriate and well described?
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.
Yes
Does the work include the necessary controls?
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.
Unable to assessAre the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.
YesAre you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an
additional statistical review?If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require furtherassessment in your comments to the editors.
Not relevant to this manuscriptQuality of written English
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:
Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited
Declaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of thismanuscript, either now or in the future?
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the
manuscript?
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that holds
or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' below.
If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
I declare that I have no competing interests.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named reportincluding any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors'responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative CommonsCC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). I understand that any commentswhich I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential commentsto the editors, which will not be published.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal