Review for 10.1186/s12876-021-01726-4 (2021)

Reviewer’s report
Title: 
Dorsal approach with Glissonian approach for laparoscopic right anatomic
liver resections
Version: 
1 
Date: 
17 Mar 2020
Reviewer's report:
The authors described the procedure of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy,
right posterior sectionectomy, and S7 using dorsal approach.
In laparoscopic hepatectomy, approach from the dorsal side has some advantages
in laparoscopic surgery. 
However, the author should address some points below.
1. During right hemihepatectomy, the procedure of identifying the root of MHV
was performed in a narrow limited view. The procedure seems to become easy
after full mobilization of the right lobe. After the exposure of the root of the
MHV, is it difficult to transect the liver parenchyma along the MHV from the
root side to the periphery from the dorsal side?
2. During right posterior sectionectomy, is it also difficult to transect the liver
parenchyma along the RHV from the root side to the periphery from the dorsal
side?
3. The comparison among LRH, LRPH, and LS7 is not important and necessary. 
4.Estimated blood loss was not so low even in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy.
Do you have any reasons?
Are the methods appropriate and well described?
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.
No
Does the work include the necessary controls?
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the
authors.
Unable to assess
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.
No
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you
recommend an additional statistical review?
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects
require further assessment in your comments to the editors.
I am able to assess the statistics
Quality of written English
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:
Needs some language corrections before being published
Declaration of competing interests
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following
questions:
1
. 
Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or
salary from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially
from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?
2
. 
Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way
gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now
or in the future?
3
. 
Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the
content of the manuscript?
4
. 
Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an
organization that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of
the manuscript?
5
. 
Do you have any other financial competing interests?
6
. 
Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this
paper?
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing
interests' below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.
I declare that I have no competing interests.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name
will be included on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted
for publication, my named report including any attachments I upload will be
posted on the website along with the authors' responses. I agree for my report to
be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons CC-BY license
(
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
). I understand that any comments
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as
confidential comments to the editors, which will not be published.
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal