Review for 10.1186/s12876-016-0418-3 (2016)

Reviewer’s report  
Title: Endovascular management of hemosuccus pancreaticus,a rare case report of 
gastrointestinal bleeding  
 
Version: 0 Date:  30 Oct 2015  
Reviewer:  Sadiq  Sikora  
Reviewer’s report:  
Interesting case report of  hemosuccus pancreaticus treated with a peripheral stent.  
 
1. The author presumes the cause as chronic pancreatitis although patient has no evidence of 
that. The authors should have discussed other causes of aneurysm of visceral artery and 
presented int he manuscript.  
 
2. Placement of a peripheral stent has the benefits of preserving the flow to spleen, 
nevertheless it would have been appropriate if discussion on embolisation of splenic 
artery and the results of its outcome in terms of complications had been presented.  
 
3. What are the limitations of placing a stent - in terms of size of aneurysm, location etc?  
 
4. Follow up CT scan pictures as mentioned in the manuscript should be added  
 
Minor issue - Spelling of reference - Sandblom on page 3 line 6 needs t be corrected.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please spe cify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
 
Unable to assess  
 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
 
Yes 
 
Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript o r would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please specify what aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
 
Not relevant to this manuscript  
 
Quality of written Engl ish 
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
 
Acceptable  
 
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, consideri ng the following questions:  
 
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an 
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this 
manuscript, e ither now or in the future?  
 
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organis ation that may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, e ither now or in the future?  
 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the  content of the 
manuscript?  
 
4. Have you received reimbursements , fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the  content of the manuscript?  
 
5. Do you have any other fin ancial competing interests?  
 
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests  in relation to this pa per? 
 
If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interests  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the  journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors' 
responses. I agree  for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be inc luded in my named report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal