Review for 10.1186/s12876-018-0762-6 (2018)

Reviewer ’s report  
Title: Gallbladder function predicts subsequent biliary compli cations in patients with common 
bile duct stones after endoscopic treatment?  
 
Version: 1 Date: 13 Sep 2017  
 
Reviewer: Güven Kahriman  
 
Reviewer's report:  
Please include all comments for the authors in this box rather than uploading your report as an 
attachment. Please only upload as attachments annotated versions of manuscripts, graphs,  
supporting materials or other aspects of your report which cannot be included in a text format.  
Please overTitle: Gallbladder function predicts subsequent biliary compli cations in patients with 
common bile duct stones after endoscopic treatment?  
Comments  to the Authors  
  
I think it's a valuable study. However, I will have some basic criticism.  
The basic spelling errors in the whole text should be corrected  
 
Abstract: Please don't use twice abbreviation of "CBDS"  
Write the ERCP in the first place clearly . 
 
Keywords: All keywords must be compatible with MESH headings.  
Introduction  
Introduction section is too long, it should be shortened.  
Line 46: please use EPLBD instead of "endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD)"  
   
Please use one of the two (EPLBD or EPBD) in the text.  
Discussion section is too long, it should be shortened.  Please don't repeat results in the 
discussion section.  
The number of references is too much, must be reduced.  
write this text when adding your comments to the authors.  
 
Are the methods appropriate and well described?  
If not, please specify what is required in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Does the work include the necessary controls?  
If not, please specify which controls are required in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?  
If not, please explain in your comments to the authors.  
Yes 
Are you able to assess any statistics in th e manus cript or would you recommend an 
additional statistical review?  
If an additional statistical review is recommended, please speci fy what  aspects require further 
assessment in your comments to the editors.  
I am able to assess the statistics  
Quality of written English  
Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:  
Acceptable  
Declaration of competing interests  
Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:  
1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an  
organisation that may in any way gain or lose financial ly from the publication of this 
manuscript, either now or in the future?  
2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation t hat may in any way gain or lose 
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the futu re? 
3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents  relating to the content of the 
manuscript?  
4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that 
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?  
5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?  
6. Do you have any non -financial competing interests in relation to this paper?  
If you c an answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests' 
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.  
 
I declare that I have no competing interest  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included 
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report 
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the websi te along with the authors' 
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons 
CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). I understand that any comments 
which I do not wish to be included in my name d report can be included as confidential comments 
to the editors, which will not be published.  
 
I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal