Instruction: Given a question and its related document, determine if the question is answerable by analyzing the information in the document. Output yes if the document addresses the question, or no otherwise.

Input:
Question: What is the maximum spacing width of the saddle pads?
Document: The body position for mountain bike geometry is not bad at all other than feeling a little more weight on your hands, which is not a bad thing if you are looking at this product. Plus if you have a front shock, the impact is greatly reduced. Once you get going and are adjusted, you can sense the slight rotation of the pads and you forget this is a non-standard saddle.
I have a Hobson Easy seat 1. I always had a hard ride with it and the seat adjustment did not always stay in the position you adjusted it to.The Hobson Easyseat 2 Saddle has a firm ride which becomes hard for me after 20 minutes of riding. Are there any seat pads that I may use with this style bicycle seat?
But if you have to sit up on the saddle, it might be a little annoying to you.The pads tended to rub my thighs when I sat atop the saddle, plus they move up/down slightly when peddling, a sensation that I don't care for.Other positives - the rails are very long allowing lots of seat positions. Seems to be pretty well made.Negatives - If you like the seat adjusted to be very wide, the seat will probably squeek if you weigh more than 150 lbs.
She actually loves it ,this seat is adjustable ( width wise )  .I should say that to get to the final setting of this seat you will have to do some fine tunning
I readjusted the width and tightened the locking screw again, so we will see what happens. I am hopeful it will hold. Otherwise the seat works okay to keep pressure off certain parts of the body.
I had originally planned to buy the Easyseat I because of the lower price, but the Hobson site itself said the Easyseat II was re-engineered to move less and had an easy to use width adjustment. So, while I suspect the I was just fine, the II has been great.
I was not sure if I should pay the extra $ and go for Easyseat II instead of Easyseat I so I went for version I. I liked the concept very much, it works. I was finally able to bike as much as wanted. The only issue was that the seat was a little hard and also the mechanism to adjust the width is very poorly designed.
Hadn't seen any reviews as to the use on a stationary bike. I had another seat which did not work very well..Easyseat II is really great. You  have to take some time to get your adjustments for both width and angle right but when you get it it really is a comfortable seat. Both myself and my wife use it and like it much better than any other seat we've ever used on a bike. The exercise bike I'm using it on is a Schwinn Airdyne.
This is my first non-traditional bike seat. I've had one other &#34;anatomic relief&#34; seats, but the horn still...caused issues. I met someone who had the Easyseat (mark I), and he spoke well of it, so I gave this a go. A couple simple adjustments (including width and tilt) and it was extremely comfortable. I also raised my bars slightly (which also was needed in general for me anyway).
Purchased this seat because it had gel in it but never found it to be comfortable no matter how it was adjusted so I returned it. The "flexing" motion of the pads takes some getting used to but in the long run it just never felt comfortable.
Answer: yes