Instruction: Given a question and the related document, and generate the answer to the question based on the information provided in the document.

Input:
Question: Does Sony make a flash adapter to enable Sony branded flash made for traditional Sony/Minolta SLR camera?  Is the in-body image stabilization functionality not implemented in this body?
Document: I'm not sure why but I actually have had LESS camera shake at shutter speeds as low as 1/25/1/30 on the A7R, Better than the A7, weird. In my case I can almost always get tack sharp photos if I stick to 1/60 or 1/80/ shutter on this A7R in low light. Too bad the Sony doesn't have image stabilization in the body such as the 5 axis in the EM-1.
Many of these lenses rely on a focusing motor housed in the camera body and this adapter contains such a motor. So as a consequence, this adapter will autofocus with older discontinued Minolta products and it will autofocus all of Sony's A-series AF lenses. The adapter weighs only 4 ounces and does not adversely affect camera handling. Also, it is well designed.
If you buy the appropriate metabones adapter, just about any lens will work. I have a TAMRON 18-200 lens (to get image stabilization,  sony has disabled this with their e-mount lens). I get 15 mega-pixel images. This is plenty resolution for me. I also have the Zeiss 24-70 lens to use for high quality work. And boy the detail really overwhelms me. Since there is no anti aliasing filter the sharpness is great in the center of the frame.
High quality, good construction and well made camera! The camera is light enough to bring on a high elevation trail. It is full frame 36.4 monster. If I had a few complains, the battery and memory card are made of plastic and could be stronger and the body is not really weather proof, there are no seal on the lense and the battery compartment. Otherwise a true winner for its price, class and quality!
Sheesh, I read so much on the issue that I even started to believe it myself after making this large purchase. But, I had to remind myself that this is simply a high resolution, FF sensor with no in-body stabilization. Basically, it is a film camera. Old rules apply here. To be cautious, I always use f 1/2x focal length AT LEAST on all my shots.
If however you want a camera with more features, better image quality, and full-frame functionality, then seriously consider this camera.There is no doubt that other manufacturers will follow Sony's lead. Some of those cameras will be as good (hopefully better than) A7r. I say hopefully better because that will push innovation. Lately Sony has done a very good job with taking the lead.
But that is to be said for any mirrorless camera.With respect to the relevant two star review, I empathize with the frustration. In-body stabilization would have been fantastic. Some other cameras have it, so why can't this one? But in the end, what's the real harm? Any photographer who has used film cameras never had stabilization other than a tripod. The fact that the camera lacks internal stabilization is irritating but does not take away from the joy and quality of this camera.
The manual is at best inadequate for such a camera that Sony is touting. Buy Brian Smith's book and use that as your manual. The camera feels great and is a joy to shoot with but the battery situation is a Big Bummer.Been shooting for a week now and very pleased with this image quality of both the 24-70mm and the 55 mm f 1.8. My adapter for my Leica 18mm just showed up and now set. But wondering if my camera is bewitched.
We also prefer to use an independent battery charger rather than charging the batter through the camera body.Update 1We have been working with the LEAE4 lens adapter for the a7R and we are very satisfied with the combination. As noted in our review, we felt a weakness of this series of cameras is the lack of full frame autofocus lenses that can be used with this camera. One solution is to buy the LAEA4 adapter that accepts Sony's A mount lenses and maintains full autofocus capability.
Between the MD adapter, M42, and Canon FD I've been able to use all of my old lenses with zero problems, including a 50 year old Minolta 50mm f/1.4 ($50 on ebay) and a stellar Zeiss Flektogon 35mm F/2.4.The power to use any vintage lens with an adapter (all your leica glass will easily mate, but so will crazy russian stuff, old vivitar series 1, or my schneider scientific lenses) is to me half the fun!
Answer: You can get Olympus OMD or Panasonic GX7 with in-body stabilization. Yes, in-body stabilization is still quite rare on DSLR and interchangeable lens camera, maybe due to the size requirements, laws of physics, and cost reasons.