Instruction: Given the user's review, identify the user's sentiment from the listed options. Answer using one of the options.

Input:
Here's a clue for someone to "re-patent" the design.
Get rid of the "zipper" fastening system. It seems redundant to fashion such an otherwise nice item, and then "top it off" with a flaw? You know; like wrapping up your girls gift of perfume in a box you from a dust bin full of rotting fish guts?
Nonetheless, there are three very good reasons to lose the zipper....
Number one, it's just wrong to have any hardened fastening system in something that stores an easily damaged DVD.
Number two; because of "that" design, if you don't pull the zipper out of its natural position when you insert or remove a DVD, you WILL scratch it simply because of where the zipper is.
Finally, zippers are a proven failed apparatus on these types of items. When nearing capacity or full capacity, I already envision the thing pulling apart like an overstuffed jacket and hundreds of dollars of DVDs flying out on the ground?
It would be quite simple and a much nicer feature if this unit had folding flaps with a wide Velcro fastener? It would also allow the unit to "open up" into a full display mood for searching through it.
As it is, be careful, push the zipper flat and out of the way before moving DVDs.
Overall features are pretty limited, but that's speaking from the standpoint of someone who would be overly cautious of, or frequently visits their collections.
As far as features and portability, no doubt there is already or will be soon, a version of this that isn't so unnecessarily bulky. Rows of the same kind of flaps, only singular (instead of 4 per page) and stacked deeper would result in more DVD's per square inch of product.
But hey; I just had nothing to do at the moment and wrote this.
Actually, it's pretty good. But let me know when someone patents my Velcro -flap fastening system.

Options:
A: very positive
B: positive
C: neutral
D: negative
E: very negative
Answer: C: neutral