Instruction: Analyze the user's review text and determine the overall sentiment expressed, then choose the corresponding sentiment option from the provided list (A: very positive, B: positive, C: neutral, D: negative, E: very negative) based on the identified sentiment.

Input:
The first one I had was given to my parents as a wedding gift (it was used daily as well as to warm my bottles) and was lost in a move when I was 37 (the pan was 42 and still in terrific shape). I've used other pans & pots and have never been totally happy. Considering the service the last pan gave me, I was looking forward to one that would outlast me (I'm 54 now). I remember what this excellent cookware was like and this pan falls short! It's made in Indonesia and the copper coating is thin, even but thin. The bottom is rough, in a large circular swirl where it looks like it was "evened off" or "made flat" as if an afterthought. While the thickness of the wall is pretty good, it isn't as thick as originally made, sort of like most if not all current denim. Also, the lid is a bit looser than previous since the taper of the lid lip has been increased to make it easier to cover, which also makes it easier for steam to escape rather than cook the food properly, the reason for the lid in the first place. While not big things separately, together, I'm not impressed. A name is supposed to mean something which is why you hunt for it and why, if you have one related to quality, you attempt to keep it that way. I guess I'm getting old and becoming another dinosaur that remembers the "Glory Days". Wish we still had some of the quality that made "Made in USA" mean something to the rest of the world, but that's business folks - and that's all!

Options:
A: very positive
B: positive
C: neutral
D: negative
E: very negative
Answer: A: very positive