Instruction: Evaluate the answerability of a question by analyzing the related document, outputting yes if the document contains information addressing the question, and no otherwise.

Input:
Question: this equipment delivers report of distance for every certified top and being i rotate the cable it indicates to that this distance i damage?
Document: The RWC does do a lot of work for you. I can't compare this to other products, because I am new to certifying cabling, but I know that it has generated false certification sometimes. I had a run that was over the max distance for 100m and 1gb (more than 100 meters) but it certified it for 1gb. I doubt that I could get that run to work with 1gb. Another time it called a cable 1gb certified for 1gb that I only tested with 100mb.
Every tech should own this cable certifier/tester. Whether it's a new install or troubleshooting existing cable, this tool is a life saver.
It is the only connector where I was able to consistently make Cat 6A patch cable that passes Cat 6A certification with a Fluke DTX1800 cable analyzer. If you will not use this connector and you cannot test your cable, I recommend you use a patch panel and use Cat 6A keystone jacks with pre certified Cat 6A patch cable. You can see a video on these connectors here[...]
If you are a professional, and your time is money, the extra time it takes to do the tests, plus the possibility that you may have to pay an assistant to stand at the far end to attach and detach the probe, might make a difference to you.The RWC1000K uses TDR (Time Domain Reflectometry) to measure the cable length and distance to faults.
At first I thought this was a great thing for testing cables and connectors to make sure they are running at Cat5e or Cat6. The unit gave  every cable in my home a Cat 6 rating. At first I thought I just was incredible at putting on RJ45 connectors (I am pretty good!) and that I just also happened to have excellent cable.
I have a number of cable/network/lan testers. I have found that there is not one single unit that does all that I want it to do. The RWC 1000k comes close. This device provides simple cable testing for shorts, miss-wires, length of cable, distance to fault and pin outs. It does not use a numbered remote for  identifying and numbering cables.
From there you can either go to toner-only mode to track it down the traditional way. Or you can switch to "blink network port" mode, to make the link-light on the other end flash on/off every second, without needing a second person there to keep plugging/unplugging the cable.When the far end of the cable is disconnected, that's when the work-flow of this device really makes great sense...
It gives you wire distance as well as testing for next and fext. any problems on the cable will be found. It is a big boost to my cable installation, helping me to make sure that the cable is not the problem when I install cable,or when there is a network issue where cabling is suspected. Great certifier for the price, though you could look at fluke networks lower end products to see if they are more accurate.
If you are just testing a run or a patch cable that is not connected to anything, use the LEFT jack.The connector labeled COAX is (obviously) for testing coaxial cable runs. (NOTE: The original, older model "Real World Certifier", which has not been sold new for several years, did not have the coax connector on top; instead, it came with an adapter that allowed testing coax by plugging into one of the RJ45 jacks.
wiring several long-distance runs at once), this device can be a poor choice.IF you need to test a number of cables quickly, where the remote end is a time-consuming distance from the source, AND you don't have (or don't want to need) a second intelligent person, AND if involved toning/tracing is unnecessary, then this device is a very bad fit for the job.
Answer: yes