Instruction: Answer the given question by extracting information from the supporting document.

Input:
Question: Is it a HMC UV(C) or HMC UV(0)? can you clarify? The title says it's UV(0) but the description says it's UV(c)
Document: I received UV(C) not UV(0) and as per some FORUMS UV(C) is the newer version. Amazon should update the Title.Filter works as expected, so far no issues.
Soo many negative review on this issue and Amazon is not doing anything about it. This is classic bait and switch. I ordered Hoya HMC Haze UV(0) and I got a Hoya HMC Haze UV(C) which is lower quality than UV(O). I will not pay to mail it back and I expect my Hoya HMC Haze UV(C) to be replaced with a Hoya HMC Haze UV(0) at Amazons or eDirectPhoto Inc expense.
The description specifies UV(0) and the item I received is UV(C).The description specifies &#34;Made in Japan&#34;. Nowhere on the product I could find the  country of origin. Country of origin is a requirement for most of the products sold in the USA.I have another UV(C) Hoya filter (bought in reputable store in Japan) which has greenish tint. This one has bluish.Most likely this is a fake product.
The advertisement on Amazon does show a photo of the filter you will be receiving, and it is indeed a photo of the UV (c) filter. The written description should be corrected to match the photo. That said, the UV (c) filter is a good filter, especially for the price, and it is still a good choice for the majority of amateur and serious photographers alike.
In tests conducted with a Hitachi U-2900 spectrophotometer by Lenstip.com the Hoya 72 mm HMC UV-0 ranked first of twenty filters tested passing 97.1% of visible light and blocking 99.8% of UV light. Not only was it ranked number one in performance, but it did so at a price considerably less than most of the competitors. For protecting expensive lenses and removing haze from your photos and videos you need look no further.
Late review, as I ordered a (0) filter back in 2011 and got this (c) instead. However, after using it all this time on a 18-200mm nikkor, I've had no issues. Does what it should: protect the lens and doesn't distort.
As a photographer with my first Canon "L" glass, I want a good filter to protect my lens from damage but also not degrade image quality. Looking for filter reviews, the Hoya HMC (non SUPER) turned out to be the top winner on the UV filters test at Lens Tip dot com. You can see the results yourself here: [...] - So that's why I'm choosing these Hoya filters.
Nice price and good quality says it all. It's a UV filter plenty on the market so quality and price are important
I have always used Hoya filters from my early slr days, because they are quality. This filter is very good, especially for the price, but I must address this ongoing issue of Hoya UV (c) versus Hoya UV (o). I went the the source, the official Hoya website, and a careful reading will tell you that the filters are most definitely not the same.
The Filter works fine, arrived packaged well and undamaged, WAS NOT as promised sent UV(C) not UV(o)as ordered. I read this happened to others. Cheap trick on sellers part saved as few cents did ya?
Answer: Sorry, HMC UVC