Instruction: Extract information from the supporting document to answer the given question.

Input:
Question: I am a painter and need good images of my work. How good are the images of artwork?
Document: I love the retro look and well made, the camera has a few quirks in the way you take images. I can learn to work with it.At time i wish it had a little more zoom, but that is only 5% of the time. This camera was purchase to take vacation photos.Any really good scenes we would use our DSLR.
Photoninja seems to work the very best of the three, but I'm getting beautiful results with Iridient, the TIFF's then fiddled with in Photoshop RAW Camera tools. The resulting images come out remarkably sharp, though you will see noise with pixel peeking. The low light landscape photos were really nice, so I don't care about the inherent noise characteristics of a smaller sensor wedded to an excellent lens when together they do such good work.
In my mind, that sort of pricing is only good for a 3-star rating.Below is a copy of my recent added review for my X10, based on my 18 month experience with the camera. Most all my comments apply to the X20 as well.A 'scientific' review by a guy who takes 3 different images with 3 different cameras is always helpful, but sometimes you have to actually work with a camera for awhile before the 'features' and eccentricities either enchant you or annoy you.
If a point and shoot doesn't give you quite the thill you need for an everyday carry camera, the FujiX20 is perfect. I use this camera while hiking because I can put it in auto when in a hurry to catch a changing scene, or put it in manual to work on a set scene.I love the feel, the look and the operation. No complaints. All the details in the other reviews have played out accurately for me.
Great little camera that does everything I need and produces excellent images in all kinds of light. Wish the batteries were easier to find but can't have everything.
with it's nifty array of vintage options, it does have somewhat steep learning curve for it to produce amazing images. I don't dislike the X20, just need to be sure I put on my thinking cap prior to using it. As smart as these camera keep getting, it seems like there is still a lot of room for error when there are so many combinations of settings to chose from.
You know you have a wonderful piece of equipment in your hands when it just feels right and the images impress you upon viewing them before any post processing work has been done. I felt that way about my M9 and my OMD files and now with the x20. The lack of an AA filter really does well to increase sharpness and the firmware does wonders in terms of reducing noise and moire.
The Fuji x20 is a nice camera; very well built and takes very good pictures. The autofocus is quick, yes, but it does need contrast in order to lock on, so I would not exactly call it state of the art. The 2.0/2.8 lens is nice; the build quality is top notch. The optical viewfinder is the best non-EVF I have used.The claims being made about its image quality being superior to other similar cameras are off the mark, though.
Sure it takes good pictures and has a zillion modes, but most every camera can do that too. And great pictures can be taken with any of them. But there are some cameras that you just gotta have and beg to be taken out and used. The X20 is one of them. No, I don't work for Fuji and this is not an advertisement. I just like the X20. If I was forced to issue a complaint, I would say size.
Here's my take after 3 days shooting:Generally good build quality. The battery hatch, pop-up flash and front focus mode switch feel of less quality (plasticky). EVF is simple and works good enough for my needs. Don't expect the hybrid VF of the X100s. The EVF does not work in Supermacromode. Nice size, light and unbelievably quite shutter. Burst mode is comparable or perhaps faster image capture than OM-D EM-5 (12mm f2 lens).
Answer: Top notch!