Instruction: Extract information from the supporting document to answer the given question.

Input:
Question: difference between PZ85U vs PZ80U 42 inch Which TV is better
Document: Panasonic Viera TH-42PZ85U 42-Inch 1080p Plasma HDTVI did a lot of research before I purchased this plasma. This is a terrific plasma for the price. Be sure to use HDMI cables and not component cables (I got bad advice). The cables make a HUGE difference. The HD images appear three diminsional and the colors are AMAZING. We also purchased a Panasonic Viera LCD flat screen and, although it's a terrific HDTV, the colors on the plasma are FAR superior.
We have a 42-inch Panasonic plasma TV that we bought about 7 years ago for $4,000. My how times have changed! The new TH-42PZ85U from Panasonic is currently selling for about  the price we paid and is a vastly better television.For starters, the outward appearance is elegant. It features a very slim cross-section and smooth, seductive lines. The screen has an anti-reflective filter which cuts way down on glare and, you guessed it, reflections.
I did it all. I looked at over 20 different models of HDTVs. LCDs, DLPs, Plasma, projector and CRT. All different sizes, too. I read over 200 reviews, both expert and consumer. What ultimately turned me to Plasma was picture quality. Smoothness of motion, color richness, exactness of details. I chose the 42 inch because it has better definition than the 46 inch. The expert reviews were all about the bigger 46 inch screen but it really didn't fully compare to the 42 inch.
It is all wonderful.As I said at the top of this review, we've had a Panasonic 42-inch plasma TV for about 7 years, as well as a 52-inch for about 5 years, and both are still in great condition. No dead pixels, no color fading, no problems at all. That gives me hope that this new entry will fare at least as well.
Panasonic Viera TH-42PZ85U 42-Inch 1080p Plasma HDTVThis TV is perfect. I did alot of research before buying. I wanted to spend a little over $1200. For the money this TV was the best bet. The picture quality is amazing and it was even delivered 4 days early! Definitely recommended.
My household has finally moved to the 21th century with this acquisition. The 42-inch Plasma TV really gives so much features and options one gets overwhelmed initially but, eventually, this is what watching TV always meant! The device almost installs itself (well... I had to drill the holes) as the instructions are clear and direct.
Panasonic, for some odd reason came out with a 46" version of this TV! I don't get it, since there is hardly any difference between 42" to 46" or from 46" to 50", as opposed to going from 42" to 50"! This is why I purchased the 42" instead, heck, if I were to consider the 46" I might as well get the 50" for almost the same price!
I saw a little Wimbledon while at best buy and the ball did see fuzzy at times. Well, a Plasma is at 480 mhz image refresh rate, so you don't have to worry about 120 vs. 60. ALso check out the contrast ratios. They are significantly higher on a Plasma. I'm not a huge spec person because they don't mean everything. But there is a difference between 1,000,000:1 vs. 10,000:1 on an LCD.
On this HDTV it's snow fluff moving through the air. I mean you can almost see every snowflake. Also, while it's true at 8 feet away there is very little seeable difference between an LCD or Plasma 1080p vs. 720p if there is a detail you need to see you can get inches away from the plasma to see it and the picture looks great. Believe me there are momments that it's good to be able to pause the video to see an important detail that wouldn't show any other way.
The sharpness is also bad especially on cable channels. The Toshiba handles that without a problem. Compare the two models and you'll see a huge difference. I also owned 40 inch Sony 40v3000, and the contrast was abysmal on that set.Blu-ray movies look acceptable because they're pre-optimized and don't require dynamic contrast that much.
Answer: There are only two differences (besides price). The 85 has 30,000:1 contrast ratio vs. the 80's 20,000:1. Side by side the average buyer would not notice the difference, and viewed separately definitely not missed. Second, the 85 has an SVGA PC input, which in my opinion is a joke because it doesn't utilize the full 1080p anyway (only 720p at best). You would need a laptop or PC with a video card capable of either HDMI out to HDMI in on the TV, or DVI out using a DVI-HDMI cable for HDMI into the TV to get the full 1080p from a laptop or PC - assuming you even care about using the TV in that capacity in the first place.My advice is save your $$, buy the 80, and put the savings into a new or upgraded HT setup or BD player if you haven't bought one yet. A $218 difference (27% increase in price) for very little benefit is nothing to take lightly.