Instruction: Extract information from the supporting document to answer the given question.

Input:
Question: Hey guys, will this camera be great for astrophotograpahy? Like capturing landscapes and the milky way?
Document: the 610 should not be here,I ve been with Nikon since the non digital one and the d600 issues should have been traited another way,here another 'almost 2000 dollars' to fix and to spent,its easier for them and just show how they care about the people who spent lot of money on a camera with issues,Canon would have done differently i bet.Im sure this 610 is a great camera but its just the previous one,600, with no issues.
Clean it and get over it it's not like the camera does t work. Just specks on the sensor. Either way this new edition is well worth the investment worth every penny. For anyone interested in purchasing this camera just do it you won't regret it one bit. Disregard all the rants from non D610 owners. I Did.
But this particular camera hits the mark, for me at least. I have been increasingly tempted to go over to Canon like a couple of my buddies have done but will hang in there and hope Nikon sees the light, their recent offer of a fix/replace for the D600 is a small step in the right direction but way too late.
I have the D600 and though I enjoy the picture quality I feel like cheated by Nikon. The dust business doesn't bother me as much though I can confirm it exists, as the fact that the camera is crippled by design with a dx autofocus that covers little of the sensor and is terribly bad in low light. The d7100 way cheaper has the autofocus this camera should have! One star for d610 which remains crippled by design.
Edit for clarity: I do actually own the D610.Nikon has finally got it right with the D610 - it is truly a fantastic camera, and that's quite a statement coming from a former D600 owner like myself.The D600 was an absolute debacle; after 2 replacements I still had massive dust and oil problems. I strongly disagree with the way Nikon "handled" the D600 problem, but people should know that the D610 is truly a fantastic camera.
Ok so I owned a D600 did not have any issues with that one. I now own the D610 and don't have any issues to report on this one either. For all other people that have exhibit issues with their own D600 Nikon has offered to repair the issue. It's not like they stand by and did nothing. And rather than having the issue continue they released the D610. It's a great camera both are really great cameras.
Great camera body. I have noticed a marked upgrade in quality from my D200 images. Also like the internal editing feature which allows some creative work in the camera. It preserves the original file and saves the edited as a new file. Low light, hi ISO pictures have very little digital noise.
It is a great all around camera and I love the photo quality I am able to achieve. It feels and operates more like a pro camera than the Canon 6D and has a good (but not unbelievable) AF system.However, a DSLR is more than just a camera because you are buying an ecosystem. You will be investing in a company with lenses, batteries, bodies, and will likely be sticking with that company for a long time for future cameras as you will be stuck with proprietary gear.
I just shoot in RAW so I can modify the white balance and exposure after the fact. The auto white balance was supposedly modified from the D600 so not sure if it's improved or they made it worse!Overall it's a great camera and probably was a smart decision vs. the Canon 6D. Seems like the Canon performs better in low light and has better video. I just wasn't impressed with any photo samples from it.
I really like this camera. I shoot with Nikon D3, D3s, D800e and I needed another full frame camera for portraits and bridal shots with a little more resolution than my D3 series cameras and the image quality is great with the D610. My only gripe about the camera is the maximum shutter of 1/4000 of a second. I love to shoot fast primes wide open in bright sunlight and 1/4000 of a second is not fast enough. Great studio camera.
Answer: It should do just fine with a sharp prime lens 2.8 or faster and a moderate ISO rating.  Be careful not to set ISO too high or you will get hot pixels on long exposures.  Best to shoot RAW so you can have greatest flexibility in post when processing the image, and use an image editor that will allow you to map hot pixels and mask them in all other resulting images.