Instruction: Generate an answer to the question by utilizing the information contained in the document.

Input:
Question: I understand that this camera does ot have image stabilization, If not then we have to buy lens with it ?
Document: The low life of the battery is bothering me and the kit lens did not do any favor. I feel something is wrong with it, so planning on returning it. If I decide to keep the camera, I will buy the 35mm f1.8 and will sell the kit lens.
Only buy this camera if you are going to correct the kit lens in post processing or shoot jpegs only.
Gonna keep it short. Got tired of lugging around a bulky dslr setup with 3 or 4 lenses. The bulk and weight were preventing me from always keeping my camera on me, even with a single prime lens it was larger than I wanted. Image quality is about the same as my d5200 but what I gained was something like 150 more focus points covering almost the entire frame which is amazing.
Even if the NEX 6 drops to below $400 with the 16-50 lens, I would still recommend purchasing the A6000 over it. I'm a pro photographer, and I would highly recommend this camera for those who want something light to take travelling, but don't want to compromise on image quality. Sony really created something good, and nearly perfect.... I didn't mention all of the reasons for why I like this camera above, but only the most significant when comparing it to the NEX-6.
Need 12,000 ISO for the .0005% of the pictures you would ever take at 12,000 ISO, then buy a 1.4 Leica lens for $1000. You will not need your 12,000.- The camera is a FAST focuser and accurate shooter. Great for capturing multiple frames of breaching whales and soccer kicks.You still need to manually set focus point for some action shots as you would with a DSLR.In Between:-Flash.
you can get extremely high quality photos for the cost of the cheapest L pro zoom lens (70-200 f4). Not bad.Many people don't understand sensor size and obsess with megapixels that they'll affectively never use/need. If you are just looking for a nice upgrade from a cell phone or old snap shot for example, I think there are other very nice, and cheaper models to chose from. There are certainly more expensive.
I do not use it (because I like the real viewfinders of DSLR). Even my wife didn't like it; she ended up in using the rear screen.- The screen is better than my Nikon dslr, but not great. It is however adequate for a person who comes from point-n-shoot background- Live histogram is helpful (but not much)- I am not a videography guy, but I didn't like the video. Its image stabilization works well for video, but sound is horrible.
You can pull it out when you first get it and start shooting immediately (provided you purchase it with a lens - I bought the 16-50 and 55-200,) and the photos are great, even when enlarged far beyond the old standby 8"x10" size. If you have any legacy glass (which I have a lot of,) simply buy an adapter and start shooting.
Still in progress on getting used to this bad boy coming from a Nikon dSLR. First, the picture quality is outstanding with the stock lens. Compared to my Nikon, the size is amazing too. I think it is pocketable in cargo shorts with a pancake lens. The on-to-shoot time is a little slower than your average dSLR, but the autofocus is much faster and works fantastically. Definitely like a point and shoot, but with an image quality that rivals anything I've seen as a prosumer.
The Sony a6000 is a joy to use. I'm used to lugging a Canon 5D Mk II with a 24-105 and a 100-400. The a6000 with the 16-50 lens fits in my shirt pocket! NOTE: the 16-50 kit lens does NOT come with a lens hood. A hood would be nice for protection. Not sure I can find one that doesn't cause vignetting on wider angles. The image quality seems to be top-notch.
Answer: Yes. The alpha6000 does not have built-in "sensor-shifting" image stabilization. This means if you want image stabilization it must be included in the lens. I think the Sony advertises this as Optical SteadyShot or having OSS technology.As an aside, it is more difficult to implement built-in image stabilization into cameras with large sensors without greatly increasing the body size, because the distance the sensor would need to travel for the stabilization effect increases with its size. I think this is why Sony is choosing to keep stabilization in the lens.