Instruction: Generate an answer to the question by utilizing the information contained in the document.

Input:
Question: Is it possible to take vertical images with this?
Document: I don't know what this is, but it is the worst purchase. It doesn't seem to help take better photos of macro subjects.
It can also snap 3-D moving objects (the only way to do that is to have a camera that captures both L and R images at the same time). The lens is sharp.
Even if the subject is moving the slightest bit, the picture will come out blurred.Conclusion: If your taking 3D pictures of stationary objects, then your fine if you use a tripod. If you want to take pictures of your children in 3D, thinking it would be cool to view later, then forget this lens. For the price I expect much better pictures. I'm going to stick with my 14-140mm kit lens.
This lens' maximum aperture of f/12 makes 3D pictures impossible to take in all of the brightest of summer afternoons. Otherwise, the pictures may come out blurry or dark and grainy due to the slow aperture. Personally, I prefer dark and grainy over blur, but my Panasonic GH2, which I have this lens mounted on, often turns out blurry pictures. Blurry pictures are completely unusable. At least I can clean up grainy pictures to an extent with Lightroom.It's not just camera shake.
If you are interested in this lens to do 3d video like I was, know that its only for 3d pictures. When the description of the lens states &#34;recording&#34; they mean recording photos. Totally misleading. Also for those who have gone as far as to figure out a way to record 3d video by taping the contacts, it does work, but its not meant for that so there ends up being a blurry border in the middle between the 2 images.
However, these allow conversion to classical anaglyphs and these are good 3D display options.What do I use it for? Well landscapes and creating technical images for my research.What's great about thisease of useImage qualitysize of the lensJpeg and MD outputWhat would I like to see in the next versionVariable aperturea wider angle versionthe ability to focus the lensa 3D macro lensSoftware suport for Mac from Panasonic
I use this lens with GF2 camera. I'm not a pro and this is not a pro lens so i can't comment on image quality in every possibly situation. I shoot in day light, indoors and outdoors. Viewed images in friend's 3D tv. It may get more use if/when i get my own 3D tv. I've never done anything with 3D before, have nothing to compare it to. Still playing, learning. Seems ok for it's purpose/specs.
Because it only uses half of the sensor for each of the twin lens it effectively a 55mm 3D lens. Not bad but wider would be better if you wanted it for landscapes, interiors etc. The fixed f-stop and big hyper-focal distance pretty much means everything is in focus and it's point and shoot.Optically it very good sharp and contrasty giving two great images per shot, bundled into the industry standard MP (Multi-Picture) format.
Panasonic Lumix 12.5mm f/12 3D G Lens for Micro Four Thirds Interchangeable Lens CamerasI am very pleased that I chose to ignore some of the negative reviews I read about this product. I found the lens simple to use. Vertical shots are not the best but they are passable. It is not the quickest lens in the world so photographing racecars might not be the best (but they may be interesting). I had great success photgraphing my grandson playing in the leaves it produced some fantastic photos.
got this for like 60 bucks, so I cant complain about the price. works best when you subject is close to lens. pics of the grand canyon might not be so impressive, but you standing in front of the canyon would give you a better feeling of depth. no video is a downer, did see that you can hack around that limitation, but haven't done that. field if view is smaller than I expected though. bit of a gimmick but for the price i'm okay with that.
Answer: No, there is no way to do vertical photo nor take a video.