Instruction: Generate an answer to the question by utilizing the information contained in the document.

Input:
Question: Does the GH3 have any advantages over this camera besides the price?
Document: If you are a video professional, this camera is a no brainer. There is nothing out there that can touch what this camera can do for anywhere near this price. However, I mostly shoot stills so that is the aspect I will be reviewing on this camera. $1700 is a lot to pay for a stills camera and the IQ is not really that big of a step up from the GH3 or E-M1 (Though it has the highest DxOMark score of any m43.)
If fact, there is no camera currently on the market that can even come close to the features that this one has at this price. If you're a DSLR shooter, put that thing away and buy this.
Excellent camera. I have had it since early May and I am absolutely loving it. At its price point, its insane. While there are better cameras out there, it out performs any other camera at its price point by a long shot. I know many long time Canon users that are now switching to this. This camera is absolutely incredible and the biggest bang for your buck.
What a fantastic camera. There are so many things I can write about that are amazing about this camera, but in the end, it came down to the price. The fact that it can produce a video image that looks better than the 5D3 at half of the cost is all you need to know. Mirrorless camera's are the future, and Canon better get their act together or they're going to be left in the dust, if they haven't been already.
Can't wait to get my hands on this camera. It will address all the flaws that the canon cameras are plagued with starting with 4k recording that canon also has but for a 15k price tag. Also a better audio interface hardware and tons of other options that you cant get right out the box with the canon cameras without ML or a bucket of money. Love canon and all there great cams but they should have came out with a camera like this 4k ago. Suckers!! !
I skipped the GH3 because the video of the GH2 was so good I really didn't see a need to upgrade. I've been missing a good stills camera, and though I have always preferred Nikon, their late tendency to increase MP size has left me incredibly unimpressed with ISO performance.
Since my real need is for video production, and I have two of the GH3s, I have the luxury of waiting for Adobe to add the raw file converter to Adobe Raw in Lightroom and PhotoShop.If you shoot only stills and you have the GH3 you probably don't need to change. I don't think the files are more than about 5% better in the new camera.
There's a better set of audio meters with a marked zero Db hashmark. There are two settings for Zebras to help you nail exposures. There's focus peaking to assist you in focus pulling and using manual focus legacy lenses.The camera takes the same batteries as the GH3 which, since I own five or six of them, is a big bonus.
They've been really great video cameras and I think their image quality, especially from raw files is as good as nearly all APS-C cameras and the Olympus m4:3 cameras. While I like my GH3's and have made money with them in video production the specs on the GH4 were too good to pass up. The camera isn't a giant step up from the GH3 but it's a great refinement.
Expectations high. Results good. Once again, this is not a still camera regardless of how well Panasonic can lead you to believe. Low levels? Okay. 4k? Well it is 4k!Wish I could do frame rates in 4k but you cannot.Once again the one this I loathe about the GH3 has been made worst in the GH4.Crop factor.Now the factor (in 4k) is around 2.5.
Answer: Honestly...no.