Instruction: Extract information from the supporting document to answer the given question.

Input:
Question: 52" Sony KDL52W4100 vs. 52 Samsung LN52A650 Still having a hard time making a decision, I'm beginning to lean more toward the Sony because of the reflective screen on the samsung and complicated tuning process.....help me out.Any input based on experience would help.
Document: One thing that always helped me make a decision between plasma and LCD sets was the fact that LCD's used a matte screen to reduce or eliminate reflections and glare. When I began shopping for a 2nd LCD for the home I wanted to go with Samsung as we had excellent experience with our 40" LCD. I was surprised and disappointed when the Samsung models I was interested in had a "new" glossy screen. The LN52A650  and LN46A650 were both sets I was looking at.
I got this TV for $1500 shipped from an online retailer. I have owned it for a few months and love it. I am very happy I read other reviews before deciding to go with this TV with the matte screen over the Samsung LN52A650 or Sony KDL52W4100. I have 3 large windows (west side of house) in the same room as the TV (facing south) and love that there is no bad glare with this set.
All displayed excellent pictures and the plasmas were a pinch better but their screens were like mirrors and in a normally lit room reflective glare was very distracting. Some of the LCD models were almost as bad. The 630 and 650 were side by side making it easy to compare video on the 2 models and it was hard to notice any picture quality difference as both were excellent, except that when the screen went white, grey, or black the difference in glare was very noticeable.
I had a hard time deciding whether the 650 would be better than the 630 model. After seeing them side by side, I realized that the higher contrast ratio of the 650 doesn't make that huge of a difference. Also, the glossy screen on the 650 is very glossy and reflects quite a bit of ambient light. I was able to play with the settings on both models and decided that the 630 was best for me. It doesn't hurt that it is cheaper as well.
I purchased the Samsung LN52A630 52-Inch 1080p 120 Hz LCD HDTV with Red Touch of Color TV in June of 2009 for $1,765.33 and have loved it ever since. This is my first time buying an LCD TV and I don't think I could have done any better. The price was great and the quality of product exceeded my expectations. I would definitely buy a Samsung again.
Samsung told me that they shipped these versions out to merchant for displaying purpose only. I believe the Samsung I received from Amazon was intended to be a store demo, and not for resale. I contacted Amazon, and they refused to help me. Amazon also makes it really hard to return the TV. Shipping fee is the buyer responsibility and there is a 15% restocking fee. This was not my fault and I am stuck with it all because I don't know how the TV should be delivered.
Perfect size for our very large room. Were able to install without help (we have a home theatre system, so it could have been tricky), and we are NOT mechanically inclined! The colors and clarity are phenomenal! Would highly recommend this TV, especially for the price. There are more expensive 52" TVs out there, and they may be "better", but our eyes certainly would not be able to tell the difference. There is not one thing we don't like about it.
Bought the A630 just before Christmas, and unveiled it for the family on Christmas Day -- fantastic TV! Main reason for writing this review is to validate the comments on glare vs. the A650. We have a huge wall of east-facing windows directly behind the open TV-viewing area (den), and with the sun coming in the windows dark scenes will still have a bit of reflection (though I would not characterize it as a harsh "glare" -- it's still a matte effect).
I absolutely love this TV and Amazon's price was right. I specifically chose the LN52A630 over other Samsung models due to the matte screen. I was concerned about high glare in the room because of windows and sunlight into the room. The glare on this TV is much less evident than the old Sony WEGA that it replaced. I can't imagine why anyone would spend more on a TV; if this one is missing anything, I surely haven't noticed it!
My 62" DLP TV went out on me for the second time. The first time, i had it repaired for about $400. So, when i noticed that it was on the fritz again. I started to look at what was out on the market. I wanted the biggest LCD i could afford. During my search i found one model to be atop all of the reviews. That was the Samsung LN52A650.For months I searched and read everything i could find.
Answer: I have the same problem. The followings is what I found out about these two TVs. Samsung has darker black level than Sony's and has a swivel stand while sony doesn't. Both have excellent pictures and colors. Samsung got Editor's Choice on Cnet.