Instruction: Given a question and the related document, and generate the answer to the question based on the information provided in the document.

Input:
Question: Canon 60D? Will it work with it?
Document: It worked well enough for smaller set ups, but my setup of Canon 60D and EFS 17-55 f/2.8 was too big for this. THe legs kept giving away and I had to make special balanced shapes of the legs to stand it up.
I paid top dollar for this item because it's a good product and it would have been a great size for my wife's Canon 60D. However, what is seemingly becoming more and more common place for Amazon is the rampant false advertising. The product I got is not what is advertised. Advertised is a Joby Gorillapod and what I got was nothing more than a cheap knockoff tripod that didn't even have a name. The package said "Camera Tripod". And that's it!!!
I like this for travel. It is easy to stash in my bag without being cumbersome like a traditional tripod. I don't, however, use it the way it was really intended. It's simply not strong enough to hold my Canon EOS 60D with a 17-40mm lens in any position other than upright for a horizontal shot. Want to turn the camera 90 to get a vertical shot? Forget it. But it's better than nothing when I'm in a pinch.
It did not work as a thought. I have Canon DSLR with EF 24-70 L lense, it is too heavy for this tripod. maybe it will be good for lighter Cameras
i never used it much. it used to hold up my canon rebel with a 200mm zoom lens. my wife has played around with it a lot which loosens up the little ball joints. now it doesn't work in a tripod position. i have to curl the legs into funny positions for it to work now. however i do still think its cool. i still use it in lieu of another tripod. i don't know if there is an alternative out there.
I was very excited to get this product and use it for my vacation. I have a Canon 40D which is very heavy. I noted that this model of the Gorillapod is supposed to be able to support a camera like mine with a large lens. I have found that this is mostly true. By that I mean that it took a little bit more work that I suspected to get the photo I wanted.
That makes it less likely that the knuckles just below the platform will buckle under the weight of the camera.So:  OK for a light SLR; limited use for a medium one (Canon 20D-40D-50D & 5D series or a Nikon D700); don't even think about it for a pro camera (Nikon D3 or Canon ID series). I'm sure this would work well for just about any camera lighter than an SLR.
This is a nifty little product - a must have for macro or travel. I use this tripod with my Canon XTi and 18-200 mm lens. It is sufficiently strong to hold it fine. Very clever design that is infinitely adjustable either for macro work close to the ground or for setting on table tops or even wrapping around a fence or a pole. Well designed and very light. Glad I purchased it.
Once this had happened in two leg segments on two of the legs, it is now unable to support the weight of a Canon 5d mkII with 24-105mm f/4 L lens. Since that is my only  good camera body, and one of my lighter lenses, it is now quite useless. I should mention though that I never put this gorillapod through much hard work, so these small fractures are not the result of improper use.
I returned it and instead bought a short center column for my regular tripod. Do not buy this expecting it to support an SLR. It did work nicely for my husbands prosumer super-zoom (Canon SX30IS) and I think that is the maximum size I'd use this for. So as advertised for a DSLR-Zoom I give it one star (zero if I could)--for a prosumer zoom it would get three or four.
Answer: Yes