Instruction: Answer the given question by extracting information from the supporting document.

Input:
Question: Can Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM be used in Canon 60D？
Document: I purchased the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens because I need some zoom when shooting weddings and my 100-400 was a bit too long for the job. I was confused at first as I did not know if I should buy this one or the earlier version. After a lot of research I decided on the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens and I am loving the results.
Only drawback is that it doesn't go down to F/2.8, but I can live with that.If you tend to use a tripod a lot then do get theCanon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens
I agonized for years whether or not to drop the kind of serious money it takes to add L series glass to my lens collection. I did lots of research on the Internet and talking with friends that shoot events semi-professionally. Finally, what I decided to do before I dropped a huge chunk of coin for this lens was to rent this lens from an online lens rental. It cost me $100 to rent the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II USM for a week.
I bought thisCanon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lensand returned it for the following two reasons:- It's heavy and after using it for some time I got neck strain and back aches.- Its HUGE, it takes up a lot of space in my camera backpack!! !Having said that, it does takes AMAZING and SHARP pictures at F/2.8.
I had an opportunity to spend a few weeks with the Mk I version of this lens, and when the time came to give it up I was a little bummed. I've been saving up for a while now, and I debated saving a some cash and getting the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM version of this lens. I decided to gamble that the Mk II would live up to the hype. I'm fairly new to the whole photography thing, so I won't get too technical.
Like others whose reviews I read before purchasing the Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L II IS USM telephoto zoom the price bothered me. I now consider it the best money I've spent to enhance my Canon 40D body. I started shooting night football; the results were disappointing with the 28-135 f/3.5 to f/5.6 zoom lens that accompanied the camera.
The lens box says Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II USM, but the the lens is EF 70-200mm USM.Unbelievable!!! This lens is about $1000 cheaper than what I paid for. Somebody changed the lens inside the box.I want to think that amazon did not do this on purpose.Actually I never had problem like this from Amazon before.
I have many favorite lenses, but overall, the 70-200 f/2.8 II is now my most-favorite - a status the predecessor to this lens, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens (version 1) held prior to this review. I was happy with the original 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, but a new version of a lens usually brings improvements of significance, as this has and at a higher price tag.
I have the 70-200mm f/4 IS and thought that would be the sharpest ever zoom lens.I was wrong.This magical lens brought a whole new world to me and I have to say comparing to the legendary 135L, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS lens may suffer from a little bit disadvantage in background blur.
I have owned the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS and the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS I and now own the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II. I agree with and will not repeat all of the positive comments made in previous reviews posted about each of these lenses. My first zoom lens was the 70-200mm f/4L and it was a fine lens.
Answer: Yes it can be used.  I bought the 70-200 lens to be used with my Rebel Xsi and it worked well.  I have since upgraded to a 7D.  The 70-200 is the best piece of glass I own and makes every camera better!