Instruction: Analyze a question and its supporting document. Predicting answerability based on the information provided in the document. Output yes if the document contains relevant information to answer the question, otherwise output no.

Input:
Question: Do you have the option of building it as static display (as if it were sitting on the tarmac) and flying display hanging from the ceiling?
Document: For example, Revell took great pains to include very precise interior details inside the nose section of the wheel well, also inside the bottom of the wing wheel wells - something that almost nobody would see if the plane is mounted on a static ground display - but the model builder sees it!A minor point, the drawing on the box cover shows the plane in flight, however the model comes as a static display (like the picture you see with canopy open, etc.).
I bought these models because I adore how these Warthogs were parked on the Tarmac at HAFB, Hawaii. They were awesome to look at and they just stun me with awe... Hopefully I can get a chance to get a close up picture of these planes.... Someday...
I just finished building this kit today and finally breathed a sigh of relief! It should really be a Skill Level 3 kit. The fit is terrible in the wings and engine nacelles, but the most annoying fit problem for me was with the anti-sway brackets on the pylons. They don't fit...That's all there is to it. Be prepared to have to sand down all 22 of the brackets.
Once again if you are building this plane wheels up, there will be some cutting and filling and re-scribing involved. The bomb/missile racks were terrible, the mounts did not fit the holes in the wings, nor the weapons. The weapons themselves need so sanding and reworking so that the wheel-well covers fit together properly. If you build this kit, with gun alone it's pretty painless, but as is, be prepared to work hard.
I too was dooped by Revell. The model seams are ugly and the whole overall quality of products this company puts out is crap! I spent time with their customer service and they only offered to replace the pieces that were warped. Like I'm suppose to take it apart, load of crap. I got into building these because my grandfather was a test pilot for the USMC for over 35 year and few over a dozen jets.
I do agree with the other reviewer that it's leaning toward being more an advanced build, potentially deserving a 3 instead of a 2 for difficulty level. That's because the parts are detailed, finely fit and need precise glue technique so the details on the parts are not ruined.So in conclusion, this is not a good starter model for my 9 year old grandson - but for older and/or more patient modelers this Revell kit will provide you with many hours of fun model building, as it is for me.
I found the kit to be quite good, but the fit between main parts such as the fuselage and twin jet engines a bit lacking. The seams are not as nice as I would like, but modeling filler worked well in most cases. Once complete, as painted in gray and shown in the image on this site, I was quite pleased with it. It now is suspended from the ceiling and compliments Battlefield 3 playing - note flat black painted wingtips.
When you assemble the forward wheel / gun well make sure all your lines on the fuselage and well are flush. Unless you want the plane sitting on it's tail you'll need to add a lot of weight. I put poster tack putty in the nose and behind the cockpit tub to get her to stay on her landing gear. When you attach the wings pay close attention to the underside alignment along the flaps and wing tips. The same is true for the underside of the engine cowlings.
little modificaton seamless fits, best tank busting jet ever! easy to assemble except the bomb and missle racks didnt have slots in the bottom of the wing so you have to cut them out of the wing prior to paint and assembly
Very poor directions. Very poor description of what to paint. Parts don't fit together very well. Had to add weight to the front of the plane? ?
Answer: yes