bargaining in the shadow of power abstract often a bargainer can use some form of power legal military or political to impose a settlement how does the outside option of being able to impose a settlement albeit at some cost affect the bargaining and how does the probability that the bargaining will break down vary with the distribution of power between the bargainers these questions are examined by adding the option of imposing a settlement to rubinstein s game of dividing a pie each actor can accept an offer make a counteroffer or try to impose a solution imposing a settlement is however costly and each bargainer has private information about its cost journal of economic literatureclassification number c72

uncertainty and incentives in crisis bargaining game free analysis of international conflict we study two different varieties of uncertainty that countries can face in international crises and establish general results about the relationship between these sources of uncertainty and the possibility of peaceful resolution of conflict among our results we show that under some weak conditions there is no equilibrium of any crisis bargaining game that has voluntary agreements and zero probability of costly war we also show that while uncertainty about the other side s cost of war may be relatively benign in peace negotiations uncertainty about the other side s strength in war makes it much more difficult to guarantee peaceful outcomes along the way we are able to assess the degree to which particular modeling assumptions found in the existing literature drive the well known relationship between uncertainty the incentive to misrepresent and costly war we find that while the theoretical connection between war and uncertainty is quite robust to relaxing many modeling assumptions whether uncertainty is about costs or the probability of victory remains important

the armed peace a punctuated equilibrium theory of war according to a leading rationalist explanation war can break out when a large rapid shift of power renders unbelievable a rising state s promise to compensate its declin ing opponent causing the latter to attack preventively this mechanism does not provide a complete and coherent explanation of war because it does not specify how inefficient fighting resolves this commitment problem we present a complete information model of war as a sequence of battles and show that although opportunities for a negotiated settle ment arise throughout the very desirability of peace creates a commitment problem that undermines its likelihood because players have incentives to settle as soon as possible they cannot credibly threaten to fight long enough if an opponent launches a surprise at tack this decreases the expected duration and costs of war and causes mutual deterrence to fail fighting s sheer destruction improves the credibility of these threats by decreasing the benefits from continuing the war equilibrium fighting may involve escalating costs that exceed the value of the stakes by the time peace is negotiated and that leave both players worse off than when the war began

strategic delay in bargaining this paper analyses a bargaining model with incomplete information in which the time between offers is an endogenous strategic variable we find equilibria involving a delay to agreement that is due to the use of strategic time delay by bargainers to signal their relative strength under some specifications of the parameters delay is present in the unique sequential equilibrium whose beliefs satisfy one intuitive restriction this delay does not vanish as the minimal time between offers becomes small

bargaining and learning while fighting much of the existing formal work on war models the decision to go to war as a game ending costly lottery this article relaxes this assumption by treating war as a costly process during which the states run the risk of military collapse the model also allows for uncertainty over either the cost of fighting or the distribution of power the analysis makes four contributions to the growing costly process literature i the present model provides a more general treatment of the learning process that occurs when states are uncertain about the distribution of power ii it explicitly compares the bargaining and learning processes for the two different sources of uncertainty iii it suggests a way to empirically distinguish wars arising from these two sources and iv it shows that the equilibrium dynamics of informational accounts of war may be quite sensitive to the underlying bargaining environment through which information is conveyed

foundations of dynamic monopoly and the coase conjecture subgame perfect equilibria are characterized for a market in which the seller quotes a price each period assume zero costs positive interest rate continuum of buyers and some technical conditions if buyers valuations are positive then equilibrium is unique buyers strategies are stationary and the price sequence is determinant along the equilibrium path but possibly randomized elsewhere otherwise a continuum of stationary equilibria can exist but at most one with analytic strategies coase s conjecture is verified for stationary strategies reducing the period length drives all prices to zero or the least valuation connections to bargaining models are described journal qf economic literature classification

the paradoxes of the successful state abstract three issues are discussed in this paper first i argue that it is impossible to understand the east asian growth miracle without appreciating the importtant role that government policy played in stimulating private investment second i will summarize some of my work on the determinants of policy effectiveness based on a cross country comparison of export subsidy regimes and show that the usual rules of thumb on what makes for good policy uniformity transparency non selectivity etc are quite useless in predicting which policy regimes perform better in practice third i will provide some evidence that the government s social insurance role creates a complementarity between states and markets these three sets of ideas yield a more balanced and nuanced view of the role of the state in economic development than has recently become commonplace

export subsidies and trade policy the experience of kenya abstract this paper finds that manufacturing firms in kenya have responded poorly to the availability of export subsidies it is argued that this has resulted from the delays and uncertainty surrounding disbursement procedures and from the limited extent to which the subsidy lessened the anti export bias of a policy structure which has emphasized import substitution it is further argued that a budgetary constraint makes it impossible to offset the anti export bias with export subsidies at existing levels of domestic market protection and that what is required is the lowering and standardization of domestic market protection levels which can be most appropriately achieved through a combination of devaluation and trade tax subsidy changes

the power to hurt costly conflict with completely informed states according to common explanations of war since war is costly and risky rational states have incentives to strike a bargain and avoid conflict war is then the result of private information about capabilities or resolve and incentives to misrepresent this information or inability to make credible commitments fearon 1995 this article presents another rationalist explanation which does not depend on either of these mechanisms by modeling warfare as a costly bargaining process the paper demonstrates that inefficient fighting can occur in equilibrium under very general assumptions favoring peace specifically it is assumed that peace can be supported in equilibrium and that fighting brings no benefits to either state only costs despite the fact that there exist many agreements that pareto dominate the final settlement states are unable to agree to them and fighting can occur in equilibrium the equilibrium is driven by the ability of states to impose costs on their opponent and bear costs the power to hurt the opponent establishes a range of acceptable settlements and the existence of such a range makes inefficient equilibria possible the article suggests that 1 states may fight if they believe that seeking peace means accepting an unpalatable settlement and 2 a diminished ability to hurt the enemy is a major reason for war termination historical examples are provided to illustrate these results

the principle of convergence in wartime negotiations if war results from disagreement about relative strength then it ends when opponents learn enough about each other learning occurs when information is revealed by strategically manipulable negotiation behavior and nonmanipulable battlefield outcomes i present a model of simultaneous bargaining and fighting where both players can make offers and asymmetric information exists about the distribution of power in the markov perfect sequential equilibrium making and rejecting offers has informational value that outweighs the one provided by the battlefield however states use both sources of information to learn and settle before military victory the principle of convergence posits that warfare ceases to be useful when it loses its informational content and that belief in defeat victory is not necessary to terminate initiate hostilities thus the standard puzzle in international relations that seeks to account for prewar optimism on both sides may not be that relevant

intimidation linking negotiation and conflict challenger demands a resource from defender in each period challenger chooses whether to attack if attacked defender chooses whether to concede the resource forever each player might be committed to ghting until victory before con ict begins defender can make nitely many offers con ict begins if challenger rejects all offers in equilibrium all offers except the last are unacceptable negotiation cannot eliminate con ict because a larger offer makes con ict increasingly attractive for challenger if negotiation fails prolonged con ict can happen in equilibrium even when uncertainty is vanishingly small we provide comparative statics regarding the probability and length of con ict

peace war and the balance of power every possible relation between the distribution of power and the likelihood of war has been defended somewhere in the literature on international politics war is least likely if power is distributed equally war is least likely if power is distributed unequally and the distribution of power has no effect on the likelihood of war i try to settle this dispute by examining the effect of expectations about the outcome of war on the choice between war and negotiation i argue that each of these mutually contradictory propositions can be derived from some plausible set of premises and thus that which one is correct depends on which set of premises best describes a situation the most important factors affecting the relation between the distribution of power and the likelihood of war are 1 whether the terms of a compromise agreement that might be accepted in lieu of war affect the distribution of power between the antagonists and therefore the probability that the agreement will be enforced and 2 how many states interests will be affected by the outcome

reputation in bargaining and durable goods monopoly this paper analyzes durable goods monopoly in an infinite horizon discrete time game we prove that as the time interval between successive offers approaches zero all seller payoffs between zero and static monopoly profits are supported by subgame perfect equilibria this reverses a well known conjecture of coase alternatively one can interpret the model as a sequential bargaining game with one sided incomplete information in which an uninformed seller makes all the offers our folk theorem for seller payoffs equally applies to the set of sequential equilibria of this bargaining game

stability and the distribution of power the relation between stability and the distribution of power is an important and long debated problem in international relations theory the balance of power school argues that an even distribution of power is more stable while the preponderance of power school argues that a preponderance of power is more stable empirical efforts to estimate this relation have yielded contradictory results this essay examines the relation between stability and the distribution of power in an infinite horizon game theoretic model in which two states are bargaining about revising the international status quo the states make offers and counteroffers until they reach a mutually acceptable settlement or until one of them becomes so pessimistic about the prospects of reaching an agreement that it uses force to impose a new settlement the equilibrium of the game contradicts the expectations of both schools and offers an explanation for the conflicting empirical estimates in the model stability is greatest when the status quo distribution of benefits reflects the expected distribution of benefits that the use of force would impose

multi battle contests abstract we study equilibrium in a multistage race in which players compete in a sequence of simultaneous move component contests players may win a prize for winning each component contest as well as a prize for winning the overall race each component contest is an all pay auction with complete information we characterize the unique subgame perfect equilibrium analytically and demonstrate that it exhibits endogenous uncertainty even a large lead by one player does not fully discourage the other player and each feasible state is reached with positive probability in equilibrium pervasiveness expected effort in the component contests may be non monotonic in the closeness of the race and realized individual effort may exceed the value of the prize by a factor that is proportional to the maximum number of stage victories required

the end of the asian myth why were the experts fooled abstract this article examines the reasons behind the overoptimism of a large segment of the economics profession concerning the performance of east asian economies which was shattered by the financial crises of 1997 98 it also shows how the crisis placed into bold relief many institutional characteristics of these economies which negate many past attempts to characterize them as open and market driven

game theory and the spiral model when one state engages in a military buildup other states sometimes take this as a sign that it is more aggressive or expansionist than they previously thought some argue that such increases in mutual suspicion can drive arms races and even lead to war psychological bias is often invoked to explain this pattern of growing suspicions leading to hostility this article presents an incomplete information model of an arms race and investigates when escalations should rationally generate increased fears and when in order to reduce such fears security seekers can refrain from building it shows that escalations rationally provoke fear even in the absence of bias and that weak states and states facing high costs of arms racing and war will be especially likely to refrain from building as a way of signaling benign intentions

bargaining in the shadow of war when is a peaceful resolution most likely this article derives the optimal bargaining strategies of the belligerents when each side has private but incomplete information about the expected outcome of a war should it take place i show that the aggressor s demand curve can be below the defender s offer curve that wars are possible even when both sides are jointly pessimistic and that the relative cost of a war can radically alter the types of disputes that end in war a simple diagram provides the intuition for most of the major propositions

rationalist explanations for war realist and other scholars commonly hold that rationally led states can and sometimes do fight when no peaceful bargains exist that both would prefer to war against this view i show that under very broad conditions there will exist negotiated settlements that genuinely rational states would mutually prefer to a risky and costly fight popular rationalist and realist explanations for war fail either to address or to explain adequately what would prevent leaders from locating a less costly bargain essentially just two mechanisms can resolve this puzzle on strictly rationalist terms the first turns on the fact that states have both private information about capabilities and resolve and the incentive to misrepresent it the second turns on the fact that in specific strategic contexts states may be unable credibly to commit to uphold a mutually preferable bargain historical examples suggest that both mechanisms are empirically plausible

exclusive dealing as a barrier to entry evidence from automobiles exclusive dealing contracts between manufacturers and retailers force new entrants to set up their own costly dealer networks to enter the market we ask whether such contracts may act as an entry barrier and provide an empirical analysis of the european car market we first estimate a demand model with product and spatial differentiation and quantify consumers valuations for dealer proximity and dealer exclusivity we then perform policy counterfactuals to assess the profit incentives and possible entry deterring effects of exclusive dealing we find that there are no unilateral incentives to maintain exclusive dealing but there is a collective incentive for the industry as a whole furthermore a ban on exclusive dealing would raise the smaller entrants market share but more importantly consumers would gain not so much because of increased price competition but rather because of the increased spatial availability which compensates for the demand inefficiency from a loss of dealer exclusivity

agreement without peace international mediation and time inconsistency problems mediation has competing short and long term effects in the short run the actors are better able to identify and settle on a mutually satisfying outcome in the long run mediation can create artificial incentives that as the mediator s influence wanes and the combatants demands change leave the actors with an agreement less durable than one that would have been achieved without mediation this article tests the observable implications from this logic using a set of international crises from 1918 to 2001 the results reconcile findings in the previous literature that inconsistently portray the effectiveness of mediation

coordination failures and government policy a model with applications to east asia and eastern europe abstract poor countries must specialize in standardized labor intensive commodities middle income countries may have a richer menu of options if their labor force is reasonably well educated and skilled the multiplicity of equilibria is due to a coordination problem inherent in activities that require specialized inputs if no intermediate inputs are presently produced there may be little incentive for any single firm to do so on its own the economy may get stuck in a low wage low tech equilibrium an investment subsidy or a minimum wage policy can enhance welfare by moving the economy to a superior equilibrium

the role of the state in financial markets this paper reexamines the role of the state in financial markets and identifies seven major market failures that provide a potential rationale for government intervention in practice government interventions in capital markets even in industrial countries have been pervasive the paper provides a taxonomy of those interventions with respect to both the objectives they serve and the instruments they employ there is a role for the government in financial markets but the success of government interventions has been mixed it is important that interventions be well designed the paper sets out principles for government regulatory interventions and applies them to prudential regulation it then examines three other areas of intervention directed credit finanical repression and competition policy and identifies circumstances in which some amount of financial repression may actually be beneficial

renegotiation proof implementation and time preferences this paper explores how the requirement that the implementation of contracts be renegotiation proof affects the set of contracts that can be implemented in a seller buyer scenario in which the information regarding the agents valuations is nonverifiable this paper explicitly adds a time dimension to an implementa tion problem and introduces a natural criterion of renegotiation proofness for the case of time consuming renegotiation the main insight gained is that the addition of the time dimension enlarges significantly the set of contracts that can be implemented in a renegotiation proof manner jel c70 d23 this paper explores how the requirement that the implementation of contracts be renegotiation proof affects the set of con tracts that can be implemented in a seller buyer scenario in which the informa tion regarding the agents valuations is non verifiable the paper s main contributions are that first it explicitly adds a time di mension to an implementation problem and second it introduces a natural criterion of renegotiation proofness for the case of time consuming renegotiation for concreteness the discussion will be conducted in the context of the following example there are two agents a seller and a buyer who sign a contract for the sale of one unit in the future their valuations for the unit denoted by s and b respectively are not known when they sign the contract they become known to both parties after the contract is signed and before it is imple mented thus when it comes to implement ing the contract the parties information is complete but it is assumed to be nonverifi able i e not observable to third parties such as a court 1 when they sign the con tract the parties want to specify for any possible realization of the valuations s b whether or not there will be trade and the price p s b at which it will take place the contract describes the procedure that will be followed after the valuations are real ized the purpose of this procedure is to make sure that the original intentions of the parties are indeed carried out the idea is that the steps laid out in the contract are independent of s b and hence are en forceable by a third party or by a social convention in game theoretic terms a contract specifies a game form that imple ments the function p in the sense that for all s and b p s b is the resulting game s unique subgame perfect equilibrium out come in the context of this scenario we shall investigate the set of price functions p s b that can be so implemented by a contract and examine how this set is affected by the requirement that the contract be renegotia

capabilities uncertainty and resolve a limited information model of crisis bargaining this paper presents and solves a crisis bargaining game under limited information the sides alternate offers from three possible offers with war and its costs starting if the target s counteroffer is rejected the equilibrium of the model falls into four different cases these four cases are analyzed to determine how the sides communicate through their offers and how the costs of war initial beliefs misperceptions and distribution of capabilities drive the probabilities of a crisis and war the model demonstrates a joint selection bias misspecification problem in empirical studies of crises arising from the unobservable nature of beliefs several empirical studies of crisis bargaining are discussed in the light of this methodological problem new patterns of evidence are found that support the presence of the selection problem and their conclusions are reexamined

do intergovernmental organizations promote peace a basic debate in world politics involves the impact of intergovernmental organizations igos on international conflict liberals functionalists and others see igos as capable of transforming global anarchy while realists emphasize the essential irrelevance of igos in managing such fundamental processes as war and peace recent quantitative studies also yield disparate conclusions depending on particular econometric assumptions implying variously that igos foster pacific relations among states have no impact on dispute behavior or even increase dispute propensity at least part of the problem is a lack of theoretical and empirical specificity the authors apply bargaining theory to develop a middle path between the realist and liberal perspectives only some igos those with security mandates and the most sophisticated institutional structures are likely to influence dispute behavior the authors combine the theory with two improvements in research design first igos vary in capability mandate and cohesion the authors construct a dataset of igo institutional heterogeneity and member cohesiveness second states join igos for reasons that are not unrelated to why states fight the authors control for the level of international involvement among countries and find support for their arguments in initial tests

persistent fighting and shifting power three striking features about both interstate and civil war are 1 there are often periods of persistent fighting 2 fighting commonly ends in negotiated settlements as well as in militarily decisive outcomes and 3 fighting sometimes recurs this article links these features to shifts in the distribution of power and to the fact that one of the functions of fighting is to forestall adverse shifts the analysis centers on a simple model of state consolidation the equilibrium displays these features fighting occurs when the distribution of power is shifting rapidly the factions avoid fighting and cut deals when the distribution of power shifts slowly or is stable fighting resumes if the distribution of power again begins to shift rapidly the analysis also shows that state consolidation can occur without fighting if the process is sufficiently slow fighting now rather than later can also reduce the total cost of fighting

the making of economic policy a transaction cost politics perspective economic policymaking as a political process the normative approach to policy analysis the positive view of political economy a synthesis the policy process in real time a theme transaction costs the transaction cost politics framework political outcomes and economic efficiency transaction cost analysis in politics mechanisms to cope with transaction costs in politics national differences two case studies to illustrate transaction cost politics tax and expenditure reform in the united states the gatt and national trade politics some reflections and suggestions some lessons for the policy process the role of the economist concluding comments appendix multiprincipal multitask agencies

hypergrowth in an east asian nic public policy and capital accumulation in singapore abstract singapore has produced the world s highest investment ratios known to account for growth more rapid than in any other less developed country over the past three decades but such high investment needs explanation we trace singapore s public policy of increasing tax concessions and infrastructural spending in effect subsidies to private firms and use an open economy neoclassical model to show how by attracting footloose foreign capital and raising investment levels these policy measures can drive growth the consequent transformation of living standards in singapore suggests in accordance with theory but contrary to most practice that for some less developed countries effectively zero tax on foreign direct investment may be a beneficial strategy yet for both singapore and other would be late industrializers major issues of development strategy arise from the kind of input driven growth analyzed in this article

distributive politics and economic growth a crude distinction between economics and politics would be that economics is concerned with expanding the pie while politics is about distributing it in this paper we analyze the relationship between the two we focus on how an economy s initial configuration of resources shapes the political struggle for income and wealth distribution and how that in turn affects long run growth our main conclusion is that inequality is conducive to the adoption of growth retarding policies we derive this result from a simple political economy model of growth and present cross country evidence consistent with it the key feature of our model is that individuals differ in their relative factor endowments we distinguish between two types of factors an accumulated factor called capital and a nonaccumulated factor called labor growth is driven by the expansion of the capital stock which is in turn determined by individual saving decisions long run growth is endogenous as the aggregate production function is taken to be linearly homogeneous in capital and productive government services taken together the provision of government services is financed by a tax on capital because government services are productive a small tax on

funds from non renewable energy resources policy lessons from alaska and alberta abstract we document the use of energy natural resource funds in alaska and alberta and analyze theirs characteristics for further implementation in resource rich countries such funds allow dealing theoretically with intergenerational equity issues corruption and more general institutional problems the performance of both funds is very different depending on the management and composition choices but some policy lessons can be drawn from these two examples importantly the role of a public dividend policy is highlighted as a way to bypass corrupted institutions and to enhance quality of life for poorest people we also emphasize the need to deal with inflation to make the fund sustainable

which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality capitalism is the dominant economic system adopted throughout the global economy but there are many different models of capitalism practiced depending on what the society decides economic effectiveness is in this study we assert that an effective economy simultaneously achieves two seemingly divergent outcomes it 1 creates economic wealth efficiently and 2 shares that wealth equitably employing insights from whitley s national business systems framework and fuzzy set analysis we examine how national institutions collectively configure with respect to the overall level of equitable wealth creation within 48 developed and developing economies we find that three configurations are associated with relatively high levels of equitable wealth creation and another three are associated with relatively low levels as such our analysis supports the notion of equifinality that there is no one optimal model of capitalism furthermore we begin to demonstrate that these models of capitalism are constantly evolving but their evolution is generally slow even when considering the practice of capitalism before and after the 2008 global economic crisis we discuss the implications of these findings for the study of international business with a special emphasis on considering a more holistic context for exploring how multinational enterprises interact with their institutional environment s

on delay in bargaining with one sided uncertainty recently attention has been given to a model of two person bargaining in which the parties alternate making offers and there is uncertainty about the valuation of one party the purpose of the analysis has been to identify delay to agreement with a screening process where agents with relatively lower valuations distinguish themselves by waiting longer to settle we point out a fundamental difficulty with this program by demonstrating that the assumptions used in the literature allow for delay only in so far as the time between offers is significant

economic growth and the quantity and distribution of education a survey the focus of this survey is to discuss different attempts at incorporating the distributional dimension of human capital into the theoretical and empirical growth framework we present a series of models which deviate from the direct link between the aggregate or average level of human capital and economic growth in that they introduce the distribution of education as a new element in explaining the relationship under investigation after surveying the theoretical literature we present recent empirical work on the relation between economic performance and the average level as well as the distribution of education respectively

foodgrain price stabilisation in an open economy a cge analysis of variable trade levies for india within the present multilateral trading system the developing countries are obliged to gradually open up their agricultural sector to world markets as a result of this the effectiveness of conventional instruments of food price stabilisation will be greatly reduced how then is food price stability to be maintained in a liberalised open economy this article presents a general equilibrium evaluation of using variable trade levies on agricultural trade to stabilise foodgrain prices in response to exogenous shocks this is done for the indian economy with the help of a multi period computable general equilibrium cge model focused on agriculture and income distribution the model is used to analyse the sensitivity of the economy s growth income distribution and food security to external and internal shocks under varying degrees of trade openness the results show that both shocks are distributionally regressive and with external shocks become more so the more open the economy is wto consistent var