the solution to the tullock rent seeking game when r 2 mixed strategy equilibria and mean dissipation rates in tullock s rent seeking model the probability a player wins the game depends on expenditures raised to the power r we show that a symmetric mixed strategy nash equilibrium exists when r 2 and that overdissipation of rents does not arise in any nash equilibrium we derive a tight lower bound on the level of rent dissipation that arises in a symmetric equilibrium when the strategy space is discrete and show that full rent dissipation occurs when the strategy space is continuous our results are shown to be consistent with recent experimental evidence on the dissipation of rents

do too many cooks always spoil the stew an experimental analysis of rent seeking and the role of a strategic buyer laboratory methods are used to evaluate the effects of institutional arrangements and rent defending activity on rent seeking auction outcomes in part nash equilibrium predictions are a useful behavioral guide as predicted more rents are dissipated in perfectly discriminating auctions where the high bidder wins than in lotteries where relative bids determine the chance of winning also as predicted the introduction of a rent defending buyer reduces social costs nevertheless the social costs of rent seeking consistently exceed predicted levels moreover individual bidding especially by buyers deviates markedly from nash predictions

asset pricing in multiperiod securities markets the intertemporal models developed in this paper have been stimulated by the capital asset pricing model capm of sharpe and lintner and the role of factor structure in ross arbitrage pricing theory apt suppose that some one dimensional stochastic process s provides a sufficient statistic for aggregate consumption then a heuristic dynamic programming argument shows that s market wealth and the wealth derivative of the value function for any agent are all locally perfectly correlated it follows from merton s work that there is a linear relationship between the local mean return on a security and the local covariance of that return with the return on the market portfolio the formal development uses martingale representation and martingale projection to obtain an intertemporal capm the history of a scalar brownian motion plays the role of a sufficient statistic we motivate the assumption of a sufficient statistic for aggregate consumption by considering a countable set of securities whose payoffs have an approximate factor structure where the factor components are in the information set generated by an n dimensional brownian motion and the idiosyncratic components are weakly correlated the approximate factor structure on the security payoffs implies that the rates of return have locally an approximate factor structure the role of the market portfolio can now be played by a set of n well diversified portfolios

rent seeking in general equilibrium a didactic illustration in the first part of the paper a simple general equilibrium model is developed which allows a graphic illustration of some of the basic ideas in rent seeking literature general equilibrium means that the alternative uses of available resources for both consumers and producers are made explicit the standard partial analysis of rent seeking is re interpreted in a general welfare theoretic framework thereby clarifying such diverse terms as consumer and producer surplus profits and rents to be captured the initial models of tullock and krueger are used to describe the social harm done by rent seeking activities in terms of a social cost benefit calculus

option valuation with systematic stochastic volatility we use an extension of the equilibrium framework of rubinstein 1976 and brennan 1979 to derive an option valuation formula when the stock return volatility is both stochastic and systematic our formula incorporates a stochastic volatility process as well as a stochastic interest rate process in the valuation of options if the mean volatility and covariance processes for the stock return and the consumption growth are predictable our option valuation formula can be written in preference free form further many popular option valuation formulae in the literature can be written as special cases of our general formula in this paper we investigate the valuation of individual stock options when the volatility of the underlying stock return is stochastic and has a systematic component which is related to the stochastic volatility of the consumption growth or the market return such an investigation is timely and of significant interest because there is now a considerable amount of evidence that the volatility of stock prices is not only stochastic but that it is also highly correlated with the volatility of the market as a whole for example see black 1975 conrad kaul and gultekin 1991 jarrow and rosenfeld 1984 jorion 1988 and ng engle and rothschild 1992 furthermore empirical work by black and scholes 1972 gultekin rogalski and tinic 1982 and whaley 1982 has shown that the empirical biases inherent in the black scholes option prices are different for options on high and low risk stocks because low risk stocks are mainly large firm stocks with stochastic return volatilities that are highly correlated with the return volatility of the market and high risk stocks are mainly small firm stocks with a lessimportant systematic volatility component incorporating systematic volatility effects in option valuation models has the potential to reduce the empirical biases exhibited by prices computed from the black scholes formula we use equilibrium arguments that extend the consumption based representative agent framework of rubinstein 1976 brennan 1979 and stapleton and subrahmanyam 1984 to allow individual asset returns and the consumption growth to exhibit stochastic volatility in particular we permit the volatility of individual asset returns to consist of a systematic component that is related to the consumption or market volatility in addi

efficient rents 2 free entry and efficient rent seeking in the competition for a monopoly right in which the number of bidders is fixed tullock and others have found the value of the resources spent in the aggregate to capture the transfer to be sometimes less than and sometimes greater than the value of the monopoly we think this approach to be incomplete since it leaves unanswered the question of what determines the number of individuals who will vie for the right to be the monopolist it is unsatisfactory to imagine for example that the franchisor sets the number of contestants one could then foresee that rent seeking would arise to influence the permissible number of bidders and this merely moves the rent seeking dissipation question one step back

migration and intergroup conflict abstract two groups in conflict produce and appropriate internally generated consumable output in a two stage game assuming equal within group sharing and endogenous group sizes it is shown how agents leave groups with high productive efficiency and migrate to groups with high appropriative and defensive capabilities

production and conflict models versus rent seeking models a production and conflict p c model and a rent seeking rs model are compared for one group two groups and k groups adding a new agent enlarges the pie in the p c model but causes the fixed size pie to be allocated on one more rent seeker in the rs model the total production or rent is distributed within and between groups according to the within group and between group decisiveness productive and fighting efficiencies and group sizes play a role the collective action problem is more severe for the rs model as group size increases the ratio of within group to between group fighting increases marginally toward a constant for the p c model while it increases convexly for the rs model adding an additional agent to each of two groups is more detrimental to the utilities in rs groups than in p c groups while adding a second group of agents when there is already one group of agents gives the reverse result the severe between group fighting in the p c model for many groups causes the p c model to be preferable for few groups while the rs model is preferable for many groups applications are considered to intergroup migration inside versus outside ownership divestitures mergers and acquisitions multidivisional versus single tier firms and u form versus m form of economic organization

a multi winner nested rent seeking contest this paper considers a symmetric imperfectly discriminating rent seeking contest in which there may be several winners we first demonstrate a serious flaw in previous work and then go on to suggest an alternative method for analyzing the contest in contrast to the previous work we show that the value of the rent is fully dissipated in equilibrium as the number of players becomes large

jump risks and the intertemporal capital asset pricing model the specification of the stochastic process for stock prices is an important assumption underlying most equilibrium and option pricing models in modern finance this is particularly true of the continuous time capital asset pricing models where it is assumed that asset prices follow diffusion processes with continuous sample paths see merton 1973a breeden 1979 grossman and shiller 1982 the extent to which the implications of these models generalize to discontinuous sample paths is an unanswered question in theoretical finance however the answer to this question is of more than just theoretical interest since accumulated empirical evidence appears to be inconsistent with the continuous sample path assumption see rosenberg 1972 oldfield rogalski and jarrow 1977 rosenfeld 1982 one purpose of this paper is to provide some answers to this question we do this by extending merton s 1973a intertemporal asset pricing model in the special case of a constant investment opportunity set to include discontinuous sample paths for asset prices the constant investment opportunity set assumption is imposed because we are interested in obtaining sufficient conditions under which an instantaneous capital asset pricing model capm results the extension of our model to a stochastic opportunity set is discussed briefly in the text this paper investigates an economy where stock prices follow a jump diffusion process the first part of the analysis derives a sufficient condition under which an instantaneous capm will characterize equilibrium expected returns the sufficient condition is that the jump component of a stock s return must be unsystematic and diversifiable in the market portfolio the second part of the paper is an empirical investigation of the satisfaction of this condition the evidence is seen to be inconsistent with the satisfaction of this hypothesis that is the market portfolio appears to contain a jump component

two stage rent seeking contests with carryovers we examine a two stage contest in which players in twogroups compete noncooperatively to win a rent in thefirst stage each group selects a finalist the twofinalists compete for the rent in the second stage first stage efforts are carried over to the secondstage in the sense that they are partly effective inthe second stage as well we show the following inthe case of player specific carryovers therent dissipation rate increases in the carryover rate with the carryover rate equal to one the rent isfully dissipated in the case of group specificcarryovers however the rent dissipation rate isindependent of the carryover rate

dissipation of contestable rents by small numbers of contenders the theory of rent seeking with its origins in the observations of gordon tullock 1967 or to use jagdish bhagwati s 1982 proposed term the theory of directly unproductive profit seeking activities is concerned with the potentially adverse effects on resource allocation of incentives to cap ture and defend artificially contrived rents and transfers the scope for so cial loss proposed by the theory derives from the relation between the value of a contestable prize and the value of the resources attracted into the con test to determine the beneficiary of the prize underlying this social loss is a specification of how rational behavior by optimizing agents links the value of the prize sought to the resources expended it has been traditional to assume competitive behavior in describing the activities of lobbying and influence seeking then if some further condi tions are satisfied l the total value of the resources expended precisely equals the value of the prize sought so dissipation is complete 2 conse quently the social cost associated with contestability of a rent can be in ferred from the value of the rent itself and the detailed and hard to come by information on individual outlays made in the course of the contest be comes unnecessary by basing their analyses on competitive dissipation contributors to the rent seeking literature see the review by robert tollison 1982 have been able to presume that the observed value of a contested rent is an exact measure of the associated social cost of monopoly power or regu lation similarly in the trade theoretic literature where the rights contested are to quota premia or revenues from trade taxes krueger 1974 bhagwati

free entry and efficient rent seeking this paper concerns rent seeking and the extent to which rents are dissipated under various circumstances gordon tullock s 1967 insight that expenditures made to capture an artificially created transfer represent a social waste suggested that the cost to the economy of monopoly and regulation is greater than the simple harberger 1954 deadweight loss indeed under tullock s original formulation and in the extensions of his work by krueger 1974 and posner 1975 rents are exactly dissipated at the social level 1 is spent to capture 1 so that the total welfare loss from such activities is equal to the harberger triangle plus the rectangle of monopoly profits

rent seeking and entry abstract it is the purpose of this paper to develop a market equilibrium model of rent seeking with entry the model determines the optimal amount of rent seeking activities by individuals the equilibrium number of rent seekers and hence also the total amount of rent seeking in the industry

transfer seeking and avoidance on the full social costs of rent seeking we would like to thank gordon tullock and an anonymous referee of this journal for their helpful comments and suggestions this abstract was borrowed from another version of this item

an intertemporal general equilibrium model of asset prices this paper develops a continuous time general equilibrium model of a simple but complete economy and uses it to examine the behavior of asset prices in this model asset prices and their stochastic properties are determined endogenously one principal result is a partial differential equation which asset prices must satisfy the solution of this equation gives the equilibrium price of any asset in terms of the underlying real variables in the economy in this paper we develop a general equilibrium asset pricing model for use in applied research an important feature of the model is its integration of real and financial markets among other things the model endogenously determines the stochastic process followed by the equilibrium price of any financial asset and shows how this process depends on the underlying real variables the model is fully consistent with rational expectations and maximizing behavior on the part of all agents our framework is general enough to include many of the fundamental forces affecting asset markets yet it is tractable enough to be specialized easily to produce specific testable results furthermore the model can be extended in a number of straightforward ways consequently it is well suited to a wide variety of applications for example in a companion paper cox ingersoll and ross 7 we use the model to develop a theory of the term structure of interest rates many studies have been concerned with various aspects of asset pricing under uncertainty the most relevant to our work are the important papers on intertemporal asset pricing by merton 19 and lucas 16 working in a continuous time framework merton derives a relationship among the equilibrium expected rates of return on assets he shows that when investment opportunities are changing randomly over time this relationship will include effects which have no analogue in a static one period model lucas considers an economy with homogeneous individuals and a single consumption good which is produced by a number of processes the random output of these processes is exogenously determined and perishable assets are defined as claims to all or a part of the output of a process and the equilibrium determines the asset prices our theory draws on some elements of both of these papers like merton we formulate our model in continuous time and make full use of the analytical tractability that this affords the economic structure of our model is somewhat similar to that of lucas however we include both endogenous production and

a continuous time arbitrage pricing model with stochastic volatility and jumps we formulate and test a continuous time asset pricing model using u s equity market data we assume that stock returns are driven by common factors including random jump size poisson processes and brownian motions with stochastic volatility the model places overidentifying restrictions on the mean returns allowing one to identify risk neutral probability distributions useful in pricing derivative securities we test for the restrictions and decompose moments of the asset returns into the contributions made by different factors our econometric methods take full account of time aggregation

a general equilibrium model of two group conflict with endogenous intra group sharing rules this paper explores the interactions among intra group sharing rules the competition between two groups over the common pool of output and the allocation of resources between productive and appropriate activities in the interior solution the use of egalitarian method for the distribution of group income among members plays no distributional role but only affects the allocation of resources it releases resources into the productive sector from the group that adopts the egalitarian rule by making the internal conflict among the members less intense the sequential choice of intra group sharing rules and resource allocations produce the adoption of fully egalitarian intra group sharing rules in both groups these rules minimize the amount of resources allocated to appropriate activities and maximize the welfare level of all individuals in the economy this result suggests that inter group competition with the use of egalitarian principle in the distribution of group income among group members which is not available to the hobbesian state of nature is one of the cheaper social devices in restraining individuals from engaging in costly appropriative activities

endogenous sharing rules in collective group rent seeking this paper examines the possibility of endogenous determination of intra group sharing rules in a collective group rent seeking game collective group rent seeking is considered as a two stage nash cournot game in which sharing rules are determined prior to individual decision on voluntary contribution the solution is subgame perfect and is obtained by backward induction in competition between two groups of the same size the nash equilibrium sharing rule of each group is to distribute rent to each according to relative effort total rent seeking outlays in this case are equal to those obtained by tullock 1980 when more than two groups compete for a rent the sharing rule based on relative effort is again likely to be the nash equilibrium strategy of each group the amount of total rent seeking outlays is also equal to that in tullock 1980 in a nutshell the rent is substantially dissipated if sharing rules are endogenously determined

the evolution of sharing rules in rent seeking contests incentives crowd out cooperation modern societies are characterized by competing organizations that rely predominantly on incentive schemes to align the behavior of their members with the organizations objectives this study contributes to explaining why in so many cases incentive schemes have gradually crowded out cooperation as an organization device our explanation does not draw on free riding the obvious achilles heel of cooperation but relies completely on fundamental group contest mechanisms by investigating a canonical rent seeking model and adopting an evolutionary perspective the analysis identifies shortcomings in previous results sets the record straight and explains why the process of incentivizing organizations is protracted

collective rent dissipation the theory of rent seeking was initiated by tullock 1967 1980 followed by krueger 1974 and posner 1975 and more recently extended in various directions by allard 1988 appelbaum and katz 1986a b c gradstein and nitzan 1989 hillman and katz 1984 1987 hillman and samet 1987 hillman and riley 1989 katz et al 1990 long and vousden 1987 ursprung 1990 and varian 1989 the purpose of this paper is to extend this theory by introducing the possibility of collective group rent seeking with voluntary individual decisions regarding their extent of participation in the collective rent seeking efforts

seeking rents by setting rents the political economy of rent seeking in recent years there has been a large number of papers on the subject of rent seeking most such works on rent seeking have taken the rent as exogenously determined by regulators regulators howeve r may also be expected and indeed have been shown to be rent seeke rs and hence the determination of the rent itself should be endogeniz ed to reflect the fact that the rent setters are themselves rent se ekers in this paper the authors do this by presenting an analysis o f the interaction of regulators firms and consumers within a rent s eeking framework where all three groups are assumed to be self motiva ted the analysis is carried out under alternative assumptions regard ing the nature of the market and the reaction functions of the partic ipants policy implications are drawn where appropriate copyright 1987 by royal economic society

risk averse rent seeking with shared rents this paper presents a nash equilibrium model of rent seeking behavior in which risk averse players expend resources to obtain a share of a rent as for example in contests for import quota licences results are obtained relating the equilibrium level of lobbying effort by each player to the value of the rent in particular reduced individual lobbying effort is associated with higher rents contested if players are sufficiently risk averse the question of whether the value of rents is a good measure of the resource cost of rent seeking is also considered a simple approximation involving risk and risk aversion parameters is derived for the proportion of rents dissipated in long run equilibrium risk and risk aversion are seen to reduce the rent dissipation ratio below unity copyright 1987 by royal economic society

private information group contests best shot competition abstract we model competing groups when players values for winning are private information each group s performance equals the best effort best shot of its members and the group with the best performance wins the contest at the symmetric equilibrium of symmetric contests increasing the number of competing teams may increase or decrease each team s performance but it unambiguously increases the overall expected best shot depending on the elasticity of the distribution of players values individual team and contest performance may increase or decrease with team size considering just two competing groups that differ only in size we show members of the smaller group use the more aggressive strategy but depending on the nature of uncertainty either team may be more likely to win more generally when teams value cdfs differ increasing one team s size decreases increases that team s chance of winning if its value cdf is elastic inelastic

the use and effect of political propaganda in democracies this paper examines the influence of political propaganda on voters and analyses the behavior of the interest groups in the face of the influence being exercised by propaganda semi truths are distributed among the electorate the decision taken by a voter results from his basic opinion and from the parts of information he receives the analysis shows that the greater the likelihood of a certain decision being reached by a fully informed electorate the more probable it is that the same decision will be reached by a rationally uninformed electorate the pecuniary interest of an interest group is however also positively correlated with the probability that the electorate reaches a decision which is agreeable to that interest group it has finally become appar ent that the results of the approach concur well with empirical studies

contests with group specific public goods and complementarities in efforts abstract this paper starts from the observation that in public goods group contests group impact can in general not be additively decomposed into some sum of functions of individual efforts we use a ces impact function to identify the main channels of influence of the elasticity of substitution on the behavior in and the outcome of such a contest we characterize the nash equilibria of this game and carry out comparative static exercises with respect to the elasticity of substitution among group members efforts if groups are homogeneous i e all group members have the same valuation and efficiency within the group the elasticity of substitution has no effect on the equilibrium for heterogeneous groups the higher the complementarity of efforts of that group the lower the divergence of efforts among group members and the lower the winning probability of that group this contradicts the common intuition that groups can improve their performance by solving the free rider problem via higher degrees of complementarity of efforts

on jump processes in the foreign exchange and stock markets exchange rates exhibit systematic discontinuities even after allowingfor conditional heteroskedasticity in the diffusion process the results are much more significant in theforeign exchange market than in the stock market which suggests differences in the structure of these markets finally this jump component is shown to explain some of the empirically observed mispricings in the currency options market the objective of this article is to analyze and compare the empirical distribution of returns in the stock market and in the foreign exchange market there are a number of reasons why a better understanding of the stochastic processes driving prices in these markets would be useful many financial models rely heavily on the assumption of a particular stochastic process while relatively little attention is paid to the empirical fit of the postulated distribution as a result models like option pricing models are applied indiscriminately to various markets such as the stock market and the foreign exchange market when the underlying processes may be fundamentally different the foreign exchange market for instance is characterized by active exchange rate man

changes in budgetary allocations and international comparisons of the social cost of rent seeking a critical note the katz rosenberg measure of rent dissipation across countries fails to encompass the consequences of different political systems wherein allocations are made observations about fiscal federal structures and the particular political structures of different countries affect political discretion in allocating government transfers owing both to the absence of these considerations which are indeed self evident and some other considerations regarding the measure the cross country rankings that katz and rosenberg present are meaningless at best and at worst misleading

efficient rents 1 rent seeking behavior in the long run we have analyzed long run behavior in rent seeking under several conditions and behavioral hypotheses the question of interest is whether or not the long run expenditures will exactly equal the value of the rents our results depend on the type of competitive response which is assumed to exist in the long run and on the r value governing the probability of winning

rent seeking for pure public goods in this paper we present a formal analysis of rent seeking for public goods by two or more groups with different numbers of individuals we begin by considering equally wealthy groups under risk neutrality a case which constitutes our basic model several surprising and interesting results emerge from the analysis of this basic case the problem is then extended to deal with a groups with different wealth levels and b risk aversion this last extension brings about a further crop of interesting and useful results

risk averse rent seekers and the social cost of monopoly power there is now quite general recognition that the social cost of monopoly power encompasses the resources expended by individuals seeking to become the beneficiaries of monopoly rents however since the activity of rent seeking is generally not observable direct estimates of resources expended in quests to acquire monopoly power are usually impossible to come by 1 as a consequence the indirect approach of taking the observed value of monopoly rents as indicative of the unobserved value of the resources expended in rent seeking is quite generally adopted in approaches to evaluation of the social cost of such activity

long run equilibrium and total expenditures in rent seeking the lure of excess profits or rents associated with monopoly power gives rise to expenditures to obtain these rents competitive rent seeking behavior is recognized as a factor which must be included among the wastes associated with monopoly power tullock 1967 posner 1975 1 the expenditures are aimed at transferring wealth rather than its creation and the use of resources to obtain this transfer is a loss to society how important rent seeking is as a part of the total monopolistic waste hinges on the size of the total expenditures induced by a given level of excess profits

rent seeking with non identical sharing rules the primary object of this paper is to examine the role of differential sharing rules within a collective rent seeking setting on the possible non existence of nash equilibrium focusing on groups that distribute part of the rent equally among their members and the residual according to relative effort we show that in rent seeking societies applying the two polar sharing rules equilibrium never exists in the general case where groups apply different but not necessarily the polar sharing rules we study the relationship between group variability in distributing rents and the problem of non existence of equilibrium in the rent seeking game

option values under stochastic volatility theory and empirical estimates abstract this paper numerically solves the call option valuation problem given a fairly general continuous stochastic process for return volatility statistical estimators for volatility process parameters are derived and parameter estimates are calculated for several individual stocks and indices the resulting estimated option values do not differ dramatically from black scholes values in most cases although there is some evidence that for longer maturity index options black scholes overvalues out of the money calls in relation to in the money calls

rent seeking with non identical sharing rules an equilibrium rescued nitzan s 1991 analysis of differential sharing rules in a collective rent seeking setting is reconsidered two groups each with more than one member are presumed to use different linear combinations of two sharing rules one based on an equal division of the prize and the other on each member s relative effort we show that an equilibrium always exists for this type of game and then characterize the equilibrium our result is contrary to nitzan s claims that a in the general case an equilibrium often does not exist and b an equilibrium never exists when the groups use the polar extreme rules

cap and trade taxes and distributional conflict enacting market based environmental regulation such as emissions taxes and cap and trade programs often create rents that are contested by agents in this paper we create a framework that compares social welfare from alternative market based environmental policy instruments under the presence of rent seeking we show that contrary to the commonly held view non revenue raising instruments nrris are in many cases preferable over revenue raising instruments rris we find that the choice of instrument depends on the size of a potential revenue recycling effect and the level of preassigned rents

do rent seeking groups announce their sharing rules i introduction rent seeking can be seen all around us firms or coalitions of firms expend resources to influence government officials who have authority to award monopoly rights self interested pressure groups lobby for government subsidies foreign producers exert effort to avoid imposing tariffs or quotas on their products interest groups or lobbyists contribute to the election of politicians who promise to advance favorable legislation research and development rd then the groups announce their decisions simultaneously before choosing their sharing rules we examine the groups decisions on releasing sharing rule information their sharing rules and the effort levels and payoffs of the individual players in equilibrium we formally consider the following three stage game in the first stage each group decides and announces whether it will release to the rival group the information about its sharing rule which will be determined in the second stage in the second stage the players in each group jointly choose their sharing rule and then each group releases the information about its sharing rule if it decided to do so in the first stage in the third stage all the players in both groups choose their effort levels simultaneously and independently at the end of this third stage the winning player is chosen and the winner shares the prize with the other players in his group according to the sharing rule on which they agreed in the second stage solving the game we find the following first the case where both groups release their sharing rule information never occurs in equilibrium second the case where neither group releases its sharing rule information occurs only if the players are evenly matched third when the players are unevenly matched one group releases its sharing rule information and the other does not

general equilibrium pricing of options on the market portfolio with discontinuous returns when the price process for a long lived asset is of a mixed jump diffusion type pricing of options on that asset by arbitrage is not possible if trading is allowed only in the underlaying asset and a risk less bond using a general equilibrium framework we derive and analyze option prices when the underlying asset is the market portfolio with discontinuous returns the premium for the risk of jumps and the diffusion risks forms a significant part of the prices of the options in this economy an attempted replication of call and put options by the black scholes type of trading strategies may require substantial infusion of funds when jumps occur we study the cost and risk implications of such dynamic hedging plans article published by oxford university press on behalf of the society for financial studies in its journal the review of financial studies

bidding in hierarchies this paper reconsiders the comparison between hierarchical contests and single stage contests a condition is given that characterizes whether and when the aggregate equilibrium payoff of contestants is higher in the single stage contest and when the single stage contest is more likely to award the prize to the contestant who values it most highly the outcome depends on inter and intra group heterogeneity and is not driven by free rider incentives

inefficiency as a strategic device in group contests against dominant opponents i introduction many strategic situations in economics and politics can be understood as contests rd nitzan and ueda 2009 a private good nitzan 1991a 1991b nitzan and ueda 2009 or a mixed good esteban and ray 2001 nitzan and ueda 2011 to a large extent the intensity of free riding or conversely the motivation for individuals to exert effort in a contest is shaped by the intra group incentive scheme or governance structure in standard contests incentives are inseparably linked to the sharing rule i e to the usually exogenous procedure by which the rents acquired in the contest are distributed within the group 1 in a number of economic applications however incentives to exert effort appear to be separate or are even willfully separated from the sharing rule phenomena such as team spirit akerlof and kranton 2005 identification with the group sherif 1966 bornstein and ben yossef 1994 peer pressure kandel and lazear 1992 or social norms to contribute to the social good elster 1989 are examples for this separation alternatively groups could apply selective incentive schemes based on relative performance lazear and rosen 1981 or marginally align individual and group incentives nitzan and ueda 2009 in all these scenarios individuals behave cooperatively i e in the interest of the entire group even if the final distribution of rents follows a standard sharing rule mechanisms to induce cooperation often are costly sanchez pages and straub 2010 may only work under restrictive conditions che and gale 2003 require strategic coordination among individuals hardin 1995 or cannot be ensured to be obeyed unanimously oliver 1980 this might explain why they do not emerge universally or automatically the point we make in this article is even stronger even if there existed perfect and costless solutions to within group free riding problems which will henceforth be called intra group efficient incentive schemes igeis they might not always be adopted why would a group for which an igeis is freely available not wish to utilize it but rather adopt an apparently inefficient governance structure by definition an igeis internalizes all within group externalities and seems to be a safe way to increase one s payoffs however this reasoning ignores repercussions that arise in strategic environments like contests suppose for example that the competing groups have sufficiently unequal strengths say due to unequal sizes or different comparative advantages then the weaker group may refrain from implementing a costless igeis to avoid the contest from heating up adoption of an igeis makes a group more efficient and consequently more aggressive in the contest on one hand higher efforts constitute a cost on the other they affect the share of the rent that this group can hope to acquire or the likelihood of succeeding in the contest 2 an igeis clearly enhances a group s prospects if the other group did not change its behavior however if members of the opponent group reply with a sufficiently strong increase in their contest efforts this diminishes and may potentially more than offset the gains from one s own increased efforts whether this happens depends on the direction of the strategic interaction between groups the detrimental firing back effect can only become relevant if the other group s efforts are sufficiently strong strategic complements to one s own efforts

strategic groups and rent dissipation we consider a rent seeking contest in which players can form strategic groups before expending their outlays we examine the profitability of endogenous group formation and the effect of such group formation on rent dissipation we show the following when just one strategic group is formed in equilibrium group formation is beneficial both to the group members and to the nonmembers and rent dissipation is smaller than with usual individual rent seeking however when more than two strategic groups are formed in equilibrium group formation is never profitable to any players and rent dissipation is greater than with individual rent seeking jel

ambiguous political power and contest efforts when there is incomplete information on the source of power in a contest the contestants may divide their lobbying efforts between the potential centers of power only one of which determines the contests winning probabilities our analysis focuses on the effect of ambiguity regarding the source of power on the contestants aggregate effort in a symmetric simple lottery contest with two potential centers of power specifically we examine the effects of varying the informativeness of the contestants private signals i e the probability that a signal is correct and the degree of correlation between them our benchmark case is the standard tullock s model in which the source of power is known i e the contestants signals are perfectly informative we show that the level of aggregate effort in this case is reached also when the signals are perfectly uninformative however in any intermediate case the contestants aggregate effort is lower provided that the signals are not perfectly correlated in other words there is a u shape relationship between the informativeness of the signals and the aggregate effort in the contest the lowest level of effort is spent when the signals are independent and the probability that a signal is true is about 0 85 in this case efforts are reduced by about one fifth in comparison with the benchmark case from a rent dissipation of 50 to slightly over 40