truthfulness with value maximizing bidders on the limits of approximation in combinatorial markets abstract in some markets bidders want to maximize value subject to a budget constraint rather than payoff this is different to the quasilinear utility functions typically assumed in auction theory and leads to different strategies and outcomes we refer to bidders who maximize value as value bidders while simple single object auction formats are truthful standard multi object auction formats allow for manipulation it is straightforward to show that there cannot be a truthful and revenue maximizing deterministic auction mechanism with value bidders and general valuations approximation has been used as remedy to achieve truthfulness on other mechanism design problems and we study which approximation ratios we can get from truthful mechanisms we show that the approximation ratio that can be achieved with a deterministic and truthful approximation mechanism with n bidders cannot be higher than 1 n for general valuations for randomized approximation mechanisms there is a framework with a ratio that is tight

choosing sides in matching games nash equilibria and comparative statics this paper characterizes equilibria in matching games where the institutional setting allows players to choose whether to become buyers sellers or not to participate in economic activity nash equilibrium consists of a partition of agents into buyers sellers and non participants such that agents in each group do not have an incentive to change their activity given the behaviour of other agents comparative static analysis demonstrates that when participation costs are so high that some agents choose not to participate a further increase in participation costs may increase the number of agents who participate in the matching process

bargaining search and outside options abstract this paper studies a two sided incomplete information bargaining model between a seller and a buyer the buyer has an outside option which is modeled as a sequential search process during which he can choose to return to bargaining at any time two cases are considered in regime i both agents have symmetric information about the search parameters we find that in contrast to bargaining with complete information the option to return to bargaining is not redundant in equilibrium however the no delay result still holds in regime ii where agents have asymmetric information about the outside option delay is possible the solution characterizes the parameters for renegotiation and those for search with no return to the bargaining table

some recent results in bargaining theory two person bargaining situations are very frequent in economic life among the most natural examples one can think of wage negotiations between an employer and a person he wishes to hire another example at a more aggregate level concerns wage renegotiations that take place periodically in large firms between the manager and the workers representative as a final example let me mention the simple and very usual situation of a seller and a potential buyer who bargain over the price of some indivisible object unlike for competitive markets economic theory and especially mathematical economics has not until recently been very helpful in explaining how prices are determined in these bargaining situations the usual explanations refer to a vague notion of respective bargaining powers of the two agents there is a clear need to precise the relations between this mysterious notion and quantifiable economic data like preferences what bargainers can get in case of an agreement outside options what they can get if agreement fails impatience risk aversion and finally information of bargainers about each other after the seminal contributions of hicks and zeuthen in the thirties john nash 1950 1953 was the first to adopt in the early fifties a systematic theoretical approach to the bargaining problem nash introduced a distinction between the axiomatic or normative approach on the one hand and the strategic or positive approach on the other hand of course the two approaches must not be viewed as independent what has come to be known as the nash program can be described as follows starting from an axiomatic solution having desirable normative properties like the solution proposed by nash himself is it possible to design a particular bargaining process that would naturally lead rational negotiators to the outcome prescribed by the axiomatic solution behind the word rational hides the main difficulty of this program find a satisfactory concept of non cooperative equilibrium for bargaining games

contracting in strategic situations abstract cooperative games are distinguished from noncooperative games by the ability to form binding pre play agreements the notion of a binding agreement however is ambiguous for two reasons first contracts can be enforced by various provisions for the payment of damages in the event of breach second contracts generally are incomplete not specifying unique actions for each possible state of the world this paper examines the interaction between incompletely specified and enforced pre play contracts and the outcomes that are achieved in 2 player strategic situations comparisons are made among various damage measures for breach of contract

qualitative uncertainty in a market with bilateral trading bargaining between a single seller and a succession of potential buyers of an indivisible object is studied in this paper the seller bargains with one buyer at a time and switching buyers is costly the seller does not know the buyers reservation prices and buyers cannot observe the quality of the object if the costs of switching buyers are high there exists a signalling equilibrium in which the seller s price offer reveals the quality of the object if the costs of switching are low adverse selection occurs and the high quality seller drops out of the market

fooling all of the people some of the time a theory of endogenous sequencing in confidential negotiations we analyse a bargaining game in which one party called the buyer has the option of choosing the sequence of negotiations with other participants called sellers when the sequencing of negotiations is confidential and the sellers goods are highly complementary efficient non dissipative equilibria exist in which the buyer randomizes over negotiation sequences in these equilibria the buyer can obtain higher pay offs than in pure strategy equilibria or in public negotiations the degree of sequencing uncertainty that maximizes buyer pay offs is inversely related to the aggregate bargaining power of the sellers

almost budget balanced mechanisms with scalar bids for allocation of a divisible good abstract this paper is about allocation of an infinitely divisible good to several rational and strategic agents the allocation is done by a social planner who has limited information because the agents valuation functions are taken to be private information known only to the respective agents we allow only a scalar signal called a bid from each agent to the social planner yang and hajek yang s hajek b 2007 vcg kelly mechanisms for allocation of divisible goods adapting vcg mechanisms to one dimensional signals ieee journal on selected areas in communications 25 6 1237 1243 and johari and tsitsiklis johari r tsitsiklis j n 2009 efficiency of scalar parameterized mechanisms operations research 57 4 823 839 proposed a scalar strategy vickrey clarke groves ssvcg mechanism with efficient nash equilibria we consider a setting where the social planner desires minimal budget surplus example situations include fair sharing of internet resources and auctioning of certain public goods where revenue maximization is not a consideration under the ssvcg framework we propose a mechanism that is efficient and comes close to budget balance by returning much of the payments back to the agents in the form of rebates we identify a design criterion for almost budget balance impose feasibility and voluntary participation constraints simplify the constraints and arrive at a convex optimization problem to identify the parameters of the rebate functions the convex optimization problem has a linear objective function and a continuum of linear constraints we propose a solution method that involves a finite number of constraints and identify the number of samples sufficient for a good approximation

a non cooperative bargaining theory with incomplete information verifiable types abstract we consider a non cooperative sequential bargaining game with incomplete information where two players negotiate for mechanisms with ex post verifiable types at the interim stage we prove the existence of a stationary sequential equilibrium of the bargaining game where the ex post nash bargaining solution with no delay is asymptotically implemented with probability one further the ex post nash bargaining solution is a unique outcome of a stationary equilibrium under the property of independence of irrelevant types iit whereby the response of every type of a player is independent of allocations proposed to his other types and under a self selection property of their belief

the principle of convergence in wartime negotiations if war results from disagreement about relative strength then it ends when opponents learn enough about each other learning occurs when information is revealed by strategically manipulable negotiation behavior and nonmanipulable battlefield outcomes i present a model of simultaneous bargaining and fighting where both players can make offers and asymmetric information exists about the distribution of power in the markov perfect sequential equilibrium making and rejecting offers has informational value that outweighs the one provided by the battlefield however states use both sources of information to learn and settle before military victory the principle of convergence posits that warfare ceases to be useful when it loses its informational content and that belief in defeat victory is not necessary to terminate initiate hostilities thus the standard puzzle in international relations that seeks to account for prewar optimism on both sides may not be that relevant

optimal dynamic mechanism design and the virtual pivot mechanism we consider the problem of designing optimal mechanisms for settings where agents have dynamic private information we present the virtual pivot mechanism which is optimal in a large class of environments that satisfy a separability condition the mechanism satisfies a rather strong equilibrium notion it is periodic ex post incentive compatible and individually rational we provide both necessary and sufficient conditions for immediate incentive compatibility for mechanisms that satisfy periodic ex post incentive compatibility in future periods the result also yields a strikingly simple mechanism for selling a sequence of items to a single buyer we also show that the allocation rule of the virtual pivot mechanism has a very simple structure a virtual index in multiarmed bandit settings finally we show through examples that the relaxation technique we use does not produce optimal dynamic mechanisms in general nonseparable environments

the importance of incomplete information in explaining the existence of costly bankruptcy the standard theory of capital structure argues that firms trade off the tax advantage of debt against ba nkruptcy costs r a haugen and l w senbet 1978 pointed out that there is a problem with this theory if bankruptcy involves deadweig ht costs shareholders and bondholders have an incentive to renegotia te before it occurs since in this way bankruptcy and its costs can be avoided this implies costly bankruptcy will not occur and casts d oubt on the validity of the standard theory this paper uses noncoope rative bargaining theory to formally model this idea it then shows t hat if there is incomplete information costly bankruptcy can occur copyright 1987 by the review of economic studies limited

bargaining and the joint cost theory of strikes an experimental study this article reports on an experiment that was designed to test predictions about the frequency of disagreement strikes in games with complete information an empirical test of the joint cost theory which relates strike activity to the marginal cost of striking is based on a set of shrinking pie games in which subjects bargained in consecutive periods over how to divide a sum of money strike activity was a frequent occurrence in these games and moreover did not disappear over time the joint cost theory received some support indicating that further tests may be useful

renegotiation and information revelation over time the case of optimal labor contracts the paper analyzes the issue of commitment in grossman and hart s model of optimal labor contracts under asymmetric information about firm profitability we extend their framework by allowing employment to vary over time at equidistant intervals when both parties can precommit ex ante not to renegotiate the contract this replicates the grossman hart outcome each subperiod when precommitment is not possible information revealed through the contract can create pareto improving renegotiation opportunities and the issue of optimal information revelation arises the paper analyzes the impact of ex post pareto improving renegotiations on the optimal contract

firm specific training layoffs and unreliable workers firm specific training layoffs and unreliable workers 1 introduction early work in implicit contract theory argues that a long term relationship between a worker and a firm evolves due to the risk sharing nature of the implicit contract between a risk averse worker and a risk neutral firm some authors have criticized this initial argument see for example haltiwanger 1983 feeling that a long term relationship between a worker and a firm and the terms of an implicit contract between the two in large parts is explained via hiring costs training costs and the like this is the approach taken in the early work of becker 1975 oi 1962 and the most recent work of jovanovic 1979a these latter explanations are also appealing because long term relations between a worker and a firm are typically characterized by quits that decline with tenure and wages that increase with tenure as discussed in mortensen 1988 explanations of these phenomena fall into two categories job search theories or job training theories job search theories stress that there is a match specific component to the productivity of any worker firm match that a good match will result in a long term relationship explains why wages are positively correlated with tenure to explain a rising wage profile within a given match requires that the firm and the worker learn about the quality of their match over time a good match will be a long term one and the wage will rise over time as the match is discovered to be a good one jovanovic 1979b and barron and loewenstein 1985 model such a learning process job training theories maintain that long term relationships with rising wages exist because of firm specific training that increases with tenure again see jovanovic 1979a as an example this paper integrates these two theories in this paper firm specific training evolves as an increasing function of a worker s tenure with a firm this is so because there is a positive probability that a worker is unreliable in that he will be searching for another employer the firm being unable to identify in advance which workers are unreliable will update its prior belief as to a worker s reliability as a function of the worker s tenure the total level of training at any point in time will be an increasing function of this updated belief thus learning about the quality of a match an aspect of the job search theories plays an important role in explaining the level of firm specific training this learning process can also play a role in determining optimal layoffs if an unreliable worker is more likely to receive an acceptable outside offer when the worker is laid off than when he is employed the firm can use layoffs to elicit information about the worker s reliabiliy based upon this fact layoffs may occur even when the worker s marginal product exceeds his value of leisure before discussing the model in detail one crucial assumption deserves comment unlike previous work such a salop and salop 1976 enforceable self revealing contracts are ruled out by assumption thus the firm here cannot commit itself to a wage contract promising low wages initially in exchange for high wages as job tenure increases which contract would attract only reliable workers this assumption is of course a polar extreme but as such is consistent with more recent work in contract theory which investigates the terms of self enforcing contracts see for example holmstrom 1983 the idea is to provide a comparison with contracts in an idealized economy with no enforcement problems this assumption is justified if the cost of writing a legally enforceable contract is prohibitive or if as suggested in charmichael 1984 reputational forces are insufficient to deter a firm from cheating although workers here are risk neutral the model could be amended to include risk averse agents

payments and liquidity under adverse selection informational asymmetries regarding the future value of assets affect their role in exchange i construct a random matching economy composed of two assets a risk free bond and a lucas tree whose terminal value is privately known to its holder no restrictions are imposed on payment arrangements the main finding supports a pecking order theory of payments agents use their risk free bonds first in order to finance their spending shocks and they use their information sensitive assets only if their holdings of bonds are depleted the theory has implications for the optimal provision of risk free bonds the structure of asset returns and liquidity

dynamic bargaining in a supply chain with asymmetric demand information we analyze a dynamic bargaining game in which a seller and a buyer negotiate over quantity and payment to trade for a product both firms are impatient and they make alternating offers until an agreement is reached the buyer is privately informed about his type which can be high or low the high type s demand is stochastically larger than the low type s in the dynamic negotiation process the seller can screen whereas the buyer can signal information through their offers and the buyer has an endogenous and type dependent reservation profit with rational assumptions on the seller s belief structure we characterize the perfect bayesian equilibrium of the bargaining game interestingly we find that both quantity distortion and information rent may be avoided depending on the firms relative patience and the seller may reach an agreement with either the high type or the low type first or with both simultaneously furthermore we explore our model to characterize the effect of demand forecasting accuracy on firm profitability we find that improved demand forecast benefits the buyer but hurts the seller when the buyer s forecasting accuracy is low however once the buyer s forecasting accuracy exceeds a threshold both firms will benefit from further improvement of the forecast this observation makes an interesting contrast to previous findings based on the one shot principal agent model in which improvement of forecasting accuracy mostly leads to a win lose outcome for the two firms and the buyer has an incentive to improve his forecasting accuracy only when it is extremely low this paper was accepted by yossi aviv operations management

bargaining with incomplete information an infinite horizon model with two sided uncertainty the resolution of any bargaining conflict depends crucially on the relative urgency of the agents to reach agreement and the information each agent has about the others preferences this paper explores within the context of an infinite horizon bargaining model with two sided uncertainty how timing and information affect the rational behaviour of agents when commitment is not possible since the bargainers are uncertain about whether trade is desirable they must communicate some of their private information before an agreement can be reached this need for learning due to incomplete information about preferences results in bargaining inefficiencies trade often occurs after costly delay thus the model provides an explanation for the inefficient bargaining behaviour that appears to occur often in practice

dynamic bargaining with transaction costs a buyer and seller alternate making offers until an offer is accepted or someone terminates negotiations the seller s valuation is common knowledge but the buyer s valuation is known only by the buyer impatience to reach an agreement comes from two sources the traders discount future payoffs and there are transaction costs of bargaining equilibrium behavior involves either immediate trade delayed trade or immediate termination depending on the size of the gains from trade and the relative bargaining costs this contrasts with the pure discounting model where termination never occurs and the pure transaction cost model where delayed trade never occurs

decentralized coercion and self restraint in provincial taxation the ottoman empire 15th 16th centuries abstract for technological reasons the central administration of a state may want to entrust to provincial delegates the dual tasks of extracting provincial resources and converting them into coercive force this article establishes that the coercive threat that the delegates pose may make the administration cap the amount they extract the cap will cause the state not to internalize the marginal benefits of provincial economic development it will also induce inefficient economic policies the identified institutional setup is consistent with the political regime economic policy and legislation of the ottoman empire during its classical age

bilateral bargaining of heterogeneous groups how significant are patient partners abstract although many real bargaining situations involve more than one person on each side of the bargaining table much of the theoretical and experimental research concentrates on two single players we study a simple extension bilateral bargaining of four people two two person groups with different patience one might think that the outcome should depend only on the most patient members of each group the impatient members agree anyway and are hence irrelevant we find however that the less patient player has at least some impact on the outcome as an explanation we suggest a decrease in uncertainty about responder behaviour if a group is clearly asymmetric

contract negotiation and the coase conjecture a strategic foundation for renegotiation proof contracts what does contract negotiation look like when some parties hold private information and negotiation frictions are negligible this paper analyzes this question and provides a foundation for renegotiation proof contracts in this environment the model extends the framework of the coase conjecture to situations in which the quantity or quality of the good is endogenously determined and to more general environments in which preferences are nonseparable in the traded goods as frictions become negligible all equilibria converge to a unique outcome which is separating efficient and straightforward to characterize

international perceptions of cost constraints on voluntary information disclosures a comparative study of u k and u s multinationals the main purpose of this paper is to examine the cost constraints on voluntary information disclosure in a comparative study of the perceptions of financial executives in u k and u s multinationals the study examines the perceived net costs or benefits of disclosing information voluntarily the types of costs involved and the significance of cost constraints in respect of specific items of disclosure the results suggest that while there is substantial agreement on the major cost constraints involved and the individual items giving rise to major net costs there are significantly different perceptions by u k and u s financial executives in terms of the overall emphasis of responses to the issue of cost constraints on voluntary information disclosures

alternating offer bargaining with two sided incomplete information i study alternating offer bargaining games with two sided incomplete information about the players discount rates for both perfect bayesian equilibrium and a rationalizability style notion i characterize the set of expected payoffs which may arise in the game i also construct bounds on agreements that may be made the set of expected payoffs is easy to compute and incorporate into applied models my main result is a full characterization of the set of perfect bayesian equilibrium payoffs for games in which the distribution over the players discount rates is of wide support yet is in a weak sense close to a point mass distribution i prove a lopsided convergence result each player cannot gain from a slight chance that she is a strong type but the player can suffer greatly if there is a slight chance that she is a weak type

timing decisions in organizations communication and authority in a dynamic environment this paper develops a theory of how organizations make timing decisions we consider a problem where an uninformed principal decides when to exercise an option and interacts with an informed but biased agent this problem is common examples include headquarters deciding when to close a plant drill an oil well or launch a product because time is irreversible the direction of the agent s bias is crucial for communication and allocation of authority when the agent favors late exercise centralized decision making where the principal retains authority and communicates with the agent often features full information revelation but ine cient delay delegation is never optimal in this case in contrast when the agent favors early exercise communication under centralized decision making is partial while option exercise is unbiased or delayed delegation is optimal if the bias is small or delegation can be timed thus delegating decisions such as plant closures is never optimal while delegating decisions such as product launches may be optimal

non cooperative bargaining and union formation we study a union formation decision problem when workers consist of two groups distinguished by different productivities workers may form either a joint union or two separate unions the whole decision process is modelled as an extensive form bargaining game workers form a joint union when the sizes or productivities of the groups are similar in the first case there is a wage differential which is more less than proportional to the productivity difference if the size of the more productive is smaller larger than that of the less productive in the second case there is no wage differential in this paper we study a union formation decision problem when workers consist of two groups distinguished by different productivities they may form either a joint union or two separate unions depending on the relative size and productivity of the two groups the whole decision process is modelled as an extensive form bargaining game in which the two groups of workers bargain with each other as well as with a firm the labour market is sharply distinguished from the goods market by the widespread practice of collective bargaining usually several groups of workers with different characteristics for example skill level or geographical location are represented as a single unit and or several employers form a single bargaining unit against a giant union this multiplicity of bargaining units creates a complicated bargaining structure and makes the outcome hard to analyse the purpose of this paper is to provide a model which captures this complexity and at the same time clarifies the underlying structure of bargaining power although economists have been aware of the multiplicity problem for a long time it has been received little rigorous theoretical treatment until recently davidson 1985 examined the possible gains that can be obtained by trade unions through joint bargaining in an oligopolistic industry there is a positive externality due to the fact that a higher wage rate in one firm generates a larger demand hence a higher wage in competing firms when a joint union is organized these externalities are internalized to the benefit of workers horn and wolinsky 1985 investigated the equilibrium pattern of unionization in an industry where a firm employs two types of workers they found that workers tend to form a single union when the two types are substitutes in the sense that the incremental contribution of one group to the firm s revenue is decreasing with respect to the size of the other group since workers bargaining power comes from the loss that they can

equilibria in extensive games the purpose of this note is to comment on the fundamental difficulties which exist in the foundations of the theory of extensive form games since selten 1973 first pointed out that it is not adequate simply to follow von neumann and morgenstern in replacing an extensive form game by its normal form there have been numerous attempts at defining an equilibrium concept for extensive form games which would fulfil the same role that nash equilibrium fulfils for normal form games notable among these are selten s 1975 two perfectness ideas and the kreps and wilson 1982 notion of a sequential equilibrium but there is also myerson s idea of a proper equilibrium kalai and samet s persistent equilibrium and numerous others the issue is particularly pressing in the study of non cooperative bargaining games with imperfect or incomplete information here sequential equilibrium has been the idea most used partly because it is couched in terms consistent with orthodox bayesian decision theory and partly because it is technically easier to apply than for example selten s trembling hand perfect idea among other authors rubinstein 1983b has noted how sensitive such analyses including his own 1983a paper are to the conjectures players are assumed to form at information sets which will not be reached in equilibrium2 and it is this question which lies at the root of the problem both the power of the equilibrium ideas under study in producing results3 and their weakness in being difficult to justify lie in the fact that they take into account potential behaviour at information sets which will not be reached in equilibrium in this note two methodological points are made the first is that the problems in justifying the use of the various equilibrium ideas can be traced to a considerable degree to the fact that the game structure has been overabstracted4 in particular the mechanism by means of which the players find their way to an equilibrium is typically abstracted away altogether but an appropriate justification requires taking some view on the nature of this mechanism ideally one would wish to offer a formal model of the equilibriating

multi dimensional procurement auction under uncertain and asymmetric information abstract this paper addresses two important issues in public procurement ex ante uncertainty about the participating agents qualities and costs and their strategic behaviour we present a novel multi dimensional auction that incentivises agents to make a partial inquiry into the procured task and to honestly report quality cost probabilistic estimates based on which the principal can choose the agent that offers the best value for money the mechanism extends second score auction design to settings where the quality is uncertain and it provides incentives to both collect information and deliver desired qualities

the design of contracts and remedies for breach in the first part of this article hypothetical contracts providing for all possible uncertain contingencies are considered in the next part contracts providing for only some contingencies are examined and are shown to be advantageous due both to difficulties that could arise in making and enforcing contingent terms and to the presence of implicit substitutes for them in the following major part of the article two of these substitutes for contingent terms are analyzed remedies for breach and the opportunity for renegotiation the existence of both is demonstrated to induce parties to behave approximately as they would under detailed contracts

selective acceptance and inefficiency in a two issue complete information bargaining game abstract this paper explores the effects of a selective acceptance rule on the outcome of two issue negotiations the alternating offer game introduced here allows for the possibility that settlement may be reached on one issue while negotiation continues about the other this model captures features of laws that are generally believed to increase efficiency the analysis shows that if one issue is indivisible there are inefficient subgame perfect equilibria with no pareto improving alternative equilibria with opposing valuations rapid communication guarantees inefficiency these are unique examples of this strong form of inefficiency in an alternating offer bargaining game with complete and perfect information journal of economic literature classification numbers c72 j30

the game of negotiations ordering issues and implementing agreements abstract we use a two issue bargaining model with asymmetric information to study agent choice of how to structure bargaining we uncover the settings in which different agenda structures are chosen in equilibrium how the order in which issues are bargained over matters and what impact the rules for implementing agreements have if agreements are implemented as they are reached easy issues are negotiated first and hard issues later if agreements are implemented only after all issues are settled then it is size that matters with large issues settled first all parties prefer the former rules of implementation to the latter

bargaining and international environmental agreements this article surveys game theoretic papers focused on the negotiation process that leads to an international environmental agreement most of the papers considered apply bargaining theory although other approaches have been considered as well among other issues the papers considered analyze the burden sharing rule that will result from a negotiation over a global public good the role of information asymmetries the impact of unilateral commitments delegation and ratification whether or not countries are going to form groups during the negotiation process and the influence of the expectation of a future bargaining process on investment decisions the basic bargaining model is optimistic as it predicts that countries will reach an efficient agreement immediately however all the developments of this model surveyed afterwards are rather pessimistic and even the basic model has perverse incentives for pre negotiation signals

damage measures and incomplete contracts i present a model of two party contracts that allows for incomplete specification of future states and actions i examine various damage measures under the assumption that courts protect only reasonable reliance expenditures so that parties make efficient reliance choices the expectations damage measure is preferred to the alternative damage measures no matter what the contractual terms are

diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross national research many researchers have pointed out that it is necessary to ensure measurement equivalence in cross national comparative research three aspects of measurement equivalence translation metric and calibration equivalence are necessary to establish the cross national reliability and validity of items used to measure theoretical constructs this paper discusses these issues and proposes two recently developed empirical techniques multiple group lisrel and optimal scaling for use in diagnosing cross national measurement equivalence these techniques are illustrated by reanalysis of a pioneering u s and japanese study the two techniques yield convergent results indicating measurement equivalence for some but not all ordinal level items under consideration the findings demonstrate that the proposed methods are useful diagnostic tools for exploring measurement equivalence several suggestions for reducing the likelihood of problems with measurement equivalence and a number of methods for dealing with items where lack of equivalence persists are also discussed

bargaining structure and strike activity in this paper the authors examine the nature of the relationship between bargaining structure and strike activity in particular they focus on the implications of the fact that the amount of information revealed by a union s actions depends on the bargaining environment in which it operates the authors demonstrate that a union representing workers of more than one firm will face a greater incentive to reject offers than an independent union this implies that a merger of two unions or the formation of bargaining coalitions will lead to a greater level of strike activity

a bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences etude d un jeu de negociation strategique sequentiel avec information incomplete caracterisation d une classe d equilibres sequentiels appeles equilibres sequentiels de negociation et demonstration de l unicite de cet equilibre

the effect of owner versus management control on the choice of accounting methods abstract this paper examines the relationship between the ownership control status of firms and the accounting methods they adopt the arguments of watts and zimmerman s positive theory are integrated with those of managerial economists to generate the prediction that management controlled firms are more likely than owner controlled firms to adopt accounting methods which increase reported earnings this prediction is inconsistent with fama s hypothesis that the market for managerial talent will prevent management controlled firms from acting differently than owner controlled firms this paper compares the depreciation methods used by a sample of management and owner controlled firms for financial reporting purposes the comparison considers and controls for the factors of firm size leverage and the depreciation method used for tax reporting purposes the comparison reveals that there is a significant difference in the depreciation methods adopted by management controlled and owner controlled firms for financial reporting purposes

north south climate change negotiations a sequential game with asymmetric information this article determines the conditions under which thesouthern countries should act together or separately whilenegotiating with the north about climate change policy andabout the conditions for future southern engagement the papermodels the international negotiations with complete and withasymmetric information in a dynamic framework results showthat depending on their characteristics the differentplayers can obtain benefits delaying the moment of theagreement

the characterization of affine maximizers on restricted domains with two alternatives abstract in the framework of implementable social choice functions we present an axiomatic characterization of affine maximizers for an important missing case in the literature that of two alternatives with restricted domain we use two independent conditions positive association of differences and an independence condition

economic interdependence bargaining power and political influence bargaining theory is used to evaluate the proposition that asymmetrical economic interdependence among states is a source of political power it is shown that asymmetrical economic interdependence does not imply that less dependent actors will be able to exercise political influence over more dependent ones the use of economic interdependence for political influence requires instead that the exchange of economic resources for political concessions make both parties to a relationship better off than they would be if they bargained over the distribution of the gains from the economic relationship alone whether this is true is independent of the degree of asymmetry in the economic relationship or its direction an explanation is given for the fact that other scholars have reached different conclusions and the implications of these results for our understanding of a variety of types of relations among governments are derived

efficient reliance and damage measures for breach of contract this article considers a situation where the buyer or the seller of a good must engage in expenditures on specific capital before the exchange either to prepare to use the product or to prepare to sell it it is assumed that postbreach bargaining is possible and carried out in a cooperative fashion and that buyers and sellers form expectations about the outcome of such bargaining in a specific way without enforceable contracts the potential appropriability of specific rents results in inefficiently low levels of investment three damage measures commonly used to enforce contracts are shown to produce inefficiently high levels of investment and to be pareto ranked from best to worst as follows specific performance expectation damages and reliance damages

communication in bargaining over decision rights abstract this paper develops a model of bargaining over decision rights between an uninformed principal and an informed but self interested agent we introduce two different bargaining mechanisms tacit and explicit bargaining in tacit bargaining an uninformed principal makes a take it or leave it price offer to the agent who then decides whether to accept or reject the offer in the equilibrium of the game the principal inefficiently screens out some agent types so that the agent s private information cannot be fully utilized when the decision is made in explicit bargaining in which parties can communicate explicitly via cheap talk before tacit bargaining however an equilibrium with no such inefficient screening exists even when the conflict of interest is arbitrarily large we also follow a mechanism design approach showing that under certain conditions explicit bargaining is an optimal bargaining mechanism that maximizes the joint surplus of the parties

the proposed introduction of current cost accounting in the u k determinants of corporate preference abstract this paper examines the corporate reaction to a major u k accounting proposal the 1976 exposure draft which called for the introduction of current cost accounting as the primary accounting convention written submissions to the u k rule making body are analyzed and four categories of preference identified probit analysis reveals that the expected cost of compliance is the most significant factor in shaping corporate preference in addition firms at risk of government investigation are more likely to support and service sector firms are more likely to oppose the proposed standard

equilibria of the sealed bid mechanism for bargaining with incomplete information we study the nash equilibria of the sealed bid bargaining mechanism with incomplete information a nonzero sum game for the case of uniform priors we describe two uncountably numerous families of equilibria the first has differentiable strategies in the second the strategies are step functions the efficiencies of these equilibria range from second best to zero for independent nonuniform priors we show that a similar situation obtains these results seem discouraging with regard to using the sealed bid mechanism in practice the mechanism might be salvaged however if bargainers turn out to confine themselves to linear strategy equilibria

self control and bargaining abstract this paper examines a bargaining game with alternating proposals where sophisticated quasi hyperbolic discounters negotiate over an infinite stream of payoffs in markov perfect equilibrium payoffs are almost always unique and a small advantage in self control can result in a large advantage in payoff in subgame perfect equilibrium a multiplicity of payoffs and delay can arise despite the complete information setting markov perfect equilibria are the best subgame perfect equilibria for the agent with more self control and the worst for the agent with less self control naivete can help a player by increasing their reservation value

bidder discounts and target premia in takeovers on news of a takeover the sum of the stock market values of the firms involved often falls and the value of the acquirer almost always does does this mean that takeovers do not raise the values of the firms involved not necessarily we set up a model in which the equilibrium number of takeovers is constrained efficient yet upon news of a takeover a target s price rises the bidder s price falls and most of the time the joint value of the target and acquirer also falls

disclosure decisions by firms and the competition for price efficiency this paper develops a model of the relationship between investment decisions by firms and the efficiency of the market prices of their securities it is shown that more efficient security prices can lead to more efficient investment decisions this provides firms with the incentive to increase price efficiency by voluntarily disclosing information about the firm disclosure decisions are studied it is shown that firms may expend more resources on disclosure than is socially optimal this is in contrast to the concern implicit in mandatory disclosure rules that firms will expend too few resources on disclosure this paper develops a model of the relationship between firms investment decisions and the efficiency of the market prices of their securities it is shown that more efficient security prices can lead to more efficient investment decisions this provides firms with the incentive to increase price efficiency by voluntarily disclosing information about the firm disclosure decisions are studied the costs of disclosure are twofold first there are costs of producing and disseminating the information included here are opportunity costs of firms employees auditing and legal expenses costs of printing and distribution and costs associated with the release of any proprietary information second there are traders costs of assimilating the information for instance while it is not very costly to obtain a firm s 8 k and 10 k once produced it is quite costly to understand the implications of their contents while the former costs have been recognized in the literature on disclosure the latter costs have not that is while traders are sometimes viewed as having access to some costly information the information contained in firms disclosures is typically taken to be costlessly observed by all see for instance diamond 1985 and dye 1987 1 taking traders costs of learning the information content of firms disclosures into account leads to new conclusions regarding incentives to expend resources on disclosure in particular it is shown that firms may spend more on disclosure than is socially optimal this overdisclosure results from firms competing for the attention of traders this is an interesting result given the public policy concern that firms on their own will spend less on disclosure than is socially optimal

asymmetric learning and the wage productivity relationship abstract a worker s current employer will typically acquire information concerning that worker s productivity that is not directly available to other potential employers a number of papers have considered this idea and argued that in such a setting these other firms will utilize the actions of the current employer as signals of productivity in this paper i argue that this perspective can explain the existence of puzzling results concerning the relationship between wage and productivity growth found in the classic studies of medoff and abraham 1980 1981

investing in a relationship a principal can make an investment anticipating a repeated relationship with an agent but the agent may appropriate the returns through ex post bargaining i study how this holdup problem and efficiency depend on the contracting environment when investment returns are observable informal contracts ex post can be more efficient than formal contracts as they induce higher investment ex ante the principal invests not only to generate direct returns but also to improve relational incentives unobservability of returns increases the principal s ability to appropriate the returns but reduces her ability to improve incentives the optimal information structure depends on bargaining power

sharing the wealth when should firms treat customers as partners marketers often stress the importance of treating customers as partners a fundamental premise of this perspective is that all parties can be weakly better off if they work together to increase joint surplus and reach pareto efficient agreements for marketing managers this implies organizing marketing activities in a manner that maximizes total surplus this logic is theoretically sound when agreements between partners are limitless and costless in most consumer marketing contexts business to consumer this is typically not true the question i ask is should one still expect firms to partner with consumers and reach pareto efficient agreements in this paper i use the example of a firm s choice of product configuration to demonstrate two effects first i show that a firm may configure a product in a manner that reduces total surplus but increases firm profits second one might conjecture that increased competition would eliminate this effect but i show that in a duopoly firm profits may be increasing in the cost of product completion this second result suggests that firms may prefer to remain inefficient and or stifie innovations both results violate a fundamental premise of partnering that firms and consumers should work together to increase total surplus and reach pareto efficient agreements the model illustrates that pareto efficient agreements are less likely to occur if negotiation with individual partners is infeasible or costly such as in business to consumer contexts consumer marketers in one to many marketing environments should be wary of treating customers as partners because pareto efficient agreements may not be optimal for their firm

a bargaining model with incomplete information multiplicity of sequential equilibria is a common problem in bargaining models with incomplete information in which the informed player makes an offer most of these equilibria are supported by optimistic conjectures by the uninformed player this paper re examines the bargaining model in rubinstein 1985a b monotonicity restrictions are placed on off the equilibrium path beliefs to exclude equilibria supported by optimistic conjectures sequential equilibria that survive these restrictions are characterized

a multistage model of bargaining this paper presents a simple multistage model of bargaining wherein a seller makes an offer that can be either accepted or refused if rejected the process continues how the seller s ability to make commitments affects bargaining outcomes is analysed by comparing the commitment equilibria to those arising when commitment is impossible the effects of increasing uncertainty about preferences and varying the length of the bargaining horizon are analysed the ways in which the bargaining environment can be changed to improve outcomes are discussed

sequential bargaining with incomplete information this paper describes a simple two person two period bargaining game and solves it using the concept of perfect bayesian equilibrium in which the actions of each player convey information which is used by his opponent the paper examines the effects of changes in bargaining costs the size of the contract zone and the length of the bargaining process on such aspects of the solution as the probability of impasse and the likelihood of concessions the combination of information transfer and the lack of pre commitment embodied in perfectness yields many surprising results common perceptions about the effects of parameter changes on bargaining processes are suspect and should be checked in the particular game being discussed

on the role of patience in collusive bertrand duopolies abstract this paper analyzes the role of patience in a repeated bertrand duopoly where firms bargain over which collusive price and market share to implement it is shown that the least patient firm s market share is not monotone in its own discount factor

posted pricing vs bargaining in sequential selling process we study the role of bargaining in a firm s sequential selling process the seller firm under consideration sequentially sells a fixed amount of stock to a random arrival stream of potential buyers who are heterogeneous in product valuation based on the stock level and the time to the end of the selling season the seller may dynamically choose either to post a take it or leave it price or to engage in bargaining with an arriving buyer we introduce a stochastic order called the scaled pricing order for the buyer s valuation distribution the scaled pricing order measures the average portion of trade surplus that the seller can obtain by posting a price for distributions with increasing length biased hazard rate checking the property of increasing decreasing scaled pricing order boils down to verifying the concavity convexity of the mills ratio we fully characterize the family of distributions that are invariant in the scaled pricing order which includes uniform and exponential distributions

relying on the information of interested parties we investigate the conventional wisdom that competition among interested parties attempting to influence a decisionmaker by providing verifiable information elicits all relevant information we find that if the decisionmaker is strategically sophisticated and well informed about the relevant variables and about the preferences of the interested party or parties competition may be unnecessary to achieve this result if the decisionmaker is unsophisticated or not well informed competition is not generally sufficient if the interested parties interests are sufficiently opposed however or if the decisionmaker is seeking to advance the parties welfare then competition can reduce or even eliminate the decisionmaker s need for prior knowledge about the relevant variables and for strategic sophistication in other settings only the combination of competition among information providers and a sophisticated skepticism is sufficient to allow effective decisionmaking

a social contract account for csr as an extended model of corporate governance i rational bargaining and justification this essay seeks to give a contractarian foundation to the concept of corporate social responsibility csr meant as an extended model of corporate governance of the firm it focuses on justification according to the contractarian point of view leaving compliance and implementation problems to a related article sacconi 2004b forthcoming in the journal of business ethics it begins by providing a definition of csr as an extended model of corporate governance based on the fiduciary duties owed to all the firm s stakeholders then by establishing the basic context of incompleteness of contracts and abuse of authority it analyses how the extended view of corporate governance arises directly from criticism of the contemporary neo institutional economic theory of the firm thereafter an application of the theory of bargaining games is used to deduce the structure of a multi stakeholder firm on the basis of the idea of a constitutional contract which satisfies basic requirements of impartial justification and accordance with intuitions of social justice this is a sequential model of constitutional bargaining whereby a constitution is first chosen and then a post constitutional coalition game is played on the basis of the unique solution given to each step in the bargaining model the quest for a prescriptive theory of governance and strategic management is accomplished so that i am able to define an objective function for the firm consistent with the idea of csr finally a contractarian potential explanation for the emergence of the multi fiduciary firm is provided

institutions and short run macroeconomic performance abstract this paper reviews the growing interest in institutions it argues that the explanation for this interest is a fresh awareness of how institutions affect economic performance this connection arises because many economic interaction take the form of one or other of three classic games prisoners dilemma coordination and chicken and the outcome in these games and hence performance of the economy is influenced by the institutional context of these interactions the paper provides a detailed illustration of this argument with a survey of the literature which relates unemployment performances to the institutions of wage setting in oecd countries