accounting for asymmetric price responses and underlying energy demand trends in oecd industrial energy demand abstract this paper explores the way technical progress and improvements in energy efficiency are captured when modelling oecd industrial energy demand the industrial sectors of the developed world involve a number of different practices and processes utilising a range of different technologies consequently given the derived demand nature of energy it is vital when modelling industrial energy demand that the impact of technical progress is appropriately captured however the energy economics literature does not give a clear guide on how this can be achieved one strand suggests that technical progress is endogenous via asymmetric price responses whereas another strand suggests that it is exogenous more recently it has been suggested that potentially there is a role for both endogenous technical progress and exogenous technical progress and consequently the general model should be specified accordingly this paper therefore attempts to model oecd industrial energy demand using annual time series data over the period 1962 2010 for 15 oecd countries using the structural time series model framework the general specifications allow for both asymmetric price responses for technical progress to impact endogenously and an underlying energy demand trend for technical progress and other factors to impact exogenously but in a non linear way the results show that almost all of the preferred models for oecd industrial energy demand incorporate both a stochastic underlying energy demand trend and asymmetric price responses this gives estimated long run income elasticities in the range of 0 34 to 0 96 estimated long run price maximum elasticities in the range of 0 06 to 1 22 estimated long run price recovery elasticities in the range of 0 00 to 0 27 and estimated long run price cut elasticities in the range of 0 00 to 0 18 furthermore the analysis suggests that when modelling industrial energy demand there is a place for endogenous technical progress and an exogenous underlying energy demand trend consequently it is argued that any modelling strategy should start by including both and only imposed restrictions if accepted by the data

why would a durable good monopolist also produce a cost inefficient nondurable good abstract we develop both commitment and time consistent stationary policies for a monopolist who produces a mixture of goods distinguished by production costs and degree of durability under commitment only the cost efficient durable good is produced and the monopoly output is realized each period for the time consistent stationary case there is an interval for the degree of durability where only the durable good is produced and a higher non overlapping interval where both the cost efficient durable and the cost inefficient nondurable good are produced for any period length when the degree of durability is such that both durable and nondurable goods are provided combined output is less than the competitive output and decreases in the degree of durability approaching the single period monopoly output when both goods are produced the coase conjecture does not hold

durable goods oligopoly abstract this paper models a durable goods oligopoly as a differential game two cases are treated sales where firms cannot lease but must sell the good in question and leasing where firms do not sell but only rent in the sales case firms face increasing marginal cost of production and the good in question depreciates for this case a rational expectations feedback nash equilibrium is constructed for which monopoly or oligopoly output is less than the efficient level this gap between oligopoly and competitive output diminishes as the number of firms increases when firms can only lease the good the good is assumed not to depreciate and the monopoly level of steady state output is compared with the level of steady state output for a feedback equilibrium duopoly for this case the duopoly equilibrium has steady state output that is less than the corresponding efficient level but greater than the monopoly level the leasing model is shown to be isomorphic to the adjustment cost duopoly model of driskill and mccafferty journal of economic theory 49 1989 324 338

equilibrium in a durable goods market with lumpy adjustment abstract durable goods are an important component of the business cycle equilibrium models of durable goods markets are made difficult by the lumpy nature of individual purchases we show that a straightforward approximation of the distribution of durable goods holdings gives rise to a tractable equilibrium model we analyze the case of competition as well as that of a monopoly producer

monopoly production of durable exhaustible resources we examine monopoly production of a durable exhaustible resource previous authors have implicitly assumed that the monopolist is able to make binding commitments about future decisions we consider the more plausible case in which the monopolist lacks this ability and must choose from dynamically consistent plans two models are considered a discrete time model in which there is a strictly finite initial stock of the resource and a continuous time model in which costs are an increasing function of cumulative production we find that as a general result monopoly leads to overconservation the monopolist who cannot precommit produces the efficient quantity ultimately but does so too slowly by contrast the monopolist who can precommit produces less than the efficient stock even in the limit we also find that increased importance of exhaustibility hastens the extraction of the resource copyright 1990 by the london school of economics and political science

state infrastructure and productive performance recent research on productivity growth has focused on public infrastructure and its impact on economic growth and productivity the authors construct a model of firms technology and behavior taking advantage of the analytical framework provided in the cost function based applied production theory literature and apply it to state level data for u s manufacturing they find that infrastructure investment provides a significant return to manufacturing firms and augments productivity growth the net benefits of infrastructure investment may or may not be positive depending upon the social costs of infrastructure investment and the relative growth rates of output and infrastructure copyright 1996 by american economic association

on requiring the durable goods monopolist to sell abstract requiring a monopolist to sell its output rather than renting it my lead to beneficial output adjustments or harmful quality adjustments in a durable goods model we show that requiring sales decreases welfare in only a small fraction of cases but it strictly increases welfare in a majority of cases

monopoly pricing with network externalities abstract how should a monopolist price a durable good or a new technology that is subject to network externalities in particular should the monopolist set a low introductory price to attract a critical mass of adopters in this paper we provide intuition as to when and why introductory pricing might occur in the presence of network externalities incomplete information about demand or asymmetric information about costs is necessary for introductory pricing to occur in equilibrium when consumers are small

reputation in bargaining and durable goods monopoly this paper analyzes durable goods monopoly in an infinite horizon discrete time game we prove that as the time interval between successive offers approaches zero all seller payoffs between zero and static monopoly profits are supported by subgame perfect equilibria this reverses a well known conjecture of coase alternatively one can interpret the model as a sequential bargaining game with one sided incomplete information in which an uninformed seller makes all the offers our folk theorem for seller payoffs equally applies to the set of sequential equilibria of this bargaining game

a theory of clearance sales clearance sales are widely used by firms as an intertemporal selling policy in particular in markets where firms face demand uncertainty and need to choose capacity in advance clearance sales consist in charging a high price initially but then lowering the price in the sales period high valuation consumers purchase the good at the high initial price so as to avoid rationing at the low price while low valuation consumers wait for the price to drop we develop a simple model of intertemporal monopoly pricing under demand uncertainty and show that clearance sales may be the optimal intertemporal selling policy

monopoly with endogenous durability abstract a multi period formulation for a durable good monopoly is developed where production and durability are decision variables when commitment to production is possible neither the level nor the depreciation rate of initial stock has an effect on the selected efficient degree of durability with time consistent production policy the optimal degree of durability is less than the efficient rate and typically increasing in the initial stock and initial degree of durability when a monopolist can switch at any time from an inefficient non durable to an efficient durable there exists a cutoff durability above which only the non durable will be produced otherwise the efficient durable will be produced

durable goods oligopoly with secondary markets the case of automobiles we study the effects of durability and secondary markets on equilibrium firm behavior in the car market we construct a dynamic oligopoly model of a differentiated product market to incorporate the equilibrium production dynamics that arise from the durability of the goods and their active trade in secondary markets we derive an econometric model and estimate its parameters using data from the automobile industry over a 20 year period our estimates are used to provide a measure of the competitive importance of the secondary market

planned obsolescence and the r d decision by investing in rd i e the r d choice that maximizes current profitability does not maximize overall profitability the result is that if output is sold rather than rented then in its r d decision the monopolist has an incentive to practice a type of planned obsolescence that lowers its own profitability

monopoly extraction of a durable non renewable resource failure of the coase conjecture the author studies a perfect information rational expectations markov equilibrium for the situation where a monopolist extracts a nonrenewable resource that is converted to a durable good even if short run extraction costs are constant the coase conjectur e fails provided that the depreciation rate of the durable good is positive copyright 1993 by the london school of economics and political science

durable goods monopoly with limited choice of commitment strategy when should the monopolist precommit consider a firm a monopolist offering a unique product to a fixed number of potential customers suppose that no consumer desires more than one unit of the good within a given period or across periods that is there is no value to repeat purchases in addition suppose that customers vary with respect to their initial reservation prices which decline over time a natural interpretation is that the monopolist is selling a good that is durable alternatively the firm is providing an entertainment or fashion good consumers may place a premium on obtaining the product quickly before it becomes less useful less stylish or less novel coase 7 conjectured that this firm s ability to extract surplus is limited because the firm has to compete with itself across time periods high valuation customers would be unwilling to pay a high initial price because they would anticipate that over time the firm will be reducing the price in order to sell to lower valuation customers subsequent literature formalizes this as a time inconsistency problem faced by a monopolist unable to make intertemporal commitments a separate strand of the literature proceeds from the polar assumption that the monopolist can precommit to any multiperiod pricing strategy comparison to coase s monopolist is simple higher profits are obtainable under precommitment because more surplus is extracted from high valuation customers an important proposition due to stokey 22 is that it will be optimal for the monopolist to precommit to a declining intertemporal price schedule if consumers with higher initial valuations have a higher rate of time preference 2 otherwise the optimal strategy is to hold price constant at the static monopoly level and to sell no more than the static monopoly quantity 3

habit persistence heterogeneous tastes and imperfect competition abstract we examine the dynamic behavior of consumption and price in a setting where imperfectly competitive producers face consumers with various intensities of rational habit persistence we establish that steady state consumption and its persistence rate are lower under time consistent monopoly than under either competition or monopoly commitment under both competition and monopoly commitment the steady state level and the transient path of consumption are unaffected by the relative mix of consumer types in the consistent case both the persistence rate and steady state consumption decrease as the proportion of habitual consumers increases

financing durable assets this paper studies the nancing of durable assets in a model with collateral constraints due to limited enforcement durability aects the ease of nancing we show that more durable assets require larger down payments of internal funds per unit of capital making them harder to nance because durability raises the price of an asset and hence the overall nancing need more than its collateral value thus nancial constraints have a bigger impact on purchases of more durable capital such as land structures and durable equipment this basic insight has implications for the choice between new and used capital technology adoption and the rent versus buy decision since new assets are more durable than used ones unconstrained borrowers buy new assets and sell them when they are used while constrained borrowers purchase used assets financial constraints inhibit technology adoption as constrained borrowers may adopt less durable low quality assets that are otherwise dominated technologies more durable assets are more likely to be rented given their larger nancing need legal enforcement aects trade in durable assets and technology adoption with weak legal enforcement economies being net importers of used assets and investing a larger fraction in less durable low quality assets

durability and strategic trade are there rents to be captured abstract this paper analyzes strategic trade policy when home and foreign duopolists produce a durable good that is either sold or leased in a third country durability is important for two reasons it characterizes most of the products discussed in the strategic trade literature and it also calls for explicit dynamic modeling for duopolists who sell their product in a third country market this paper finds the optimal policy to be a tax on domestic output for duopolists who lease the good in a third country market though the optimal policy is a subsidy

durable goods monopoly with discrete demand we analyze a dynamic game between consumers and the sole seller of a durable good unlike previous analyses we assume that there exists a finite collection of buyers rather than a continuum none of the main conclusions of the literature on durable goods monopoly survives this change in assumption coase s conjecture that a durable goods monopolist cannot earn supracompetitive profits in the continuous time limit bulow s proposition that renting a durable is always more profitable than selling it and stokey s proposition that precommitting to a time path of prices is always optimal are all false when the set of buyers is finite thus the assumption of a continuum of consumers so innocuous and useful a simplification in other contexts has proved misleading in the context of durable goods monopoly

imperfect durability and the coase conjecture this article considers a market served by a monopolist who sells a durable good that depreciates stochastically over time we show that there exist three types of stationary equilibria a coase conjecture equilibrium a monopoly equilibrium and a reputational equilibrium when the depreciation rate is low the coase conjecture equilibrium is the unique equilibrium for intermediate values of the depreciation rate all three equilibrium types coexist when the depreciation rate is high the monopoly equilibrium is the unique equilibrium consequently when selling a good of sufficiently low durability the monopolist does not lose any of her monopoly power furthermore the steady state output in the reputational equilibrium falls below the monopoly quantity hence in durable goods markets welfare losses due to monopoly power may be larger than in markets for perishables

eliminating the market for secondhand goods an alternative explanation for leasing there are a number of prominent specific instances in which a durable goods manufacturer with significant market power employed a lease only policy i united shoe in the market for shoe machinery ii ibm in the market for computers and iii xerox in the market for copiers the obvious question that arises is why would such a firm prefer leasing over selling in this article i argue that one role of the lease only policy was to eliminate the market for secondhand goods the article formally demonstrates the argument discusses the relationship between this article and earlier literature on secondhand markets and discusses the implications for antitrust policy

coase and hotelling a meeting of the minds in this paper we tie together the two literatures of durable goods monopoly and exhaustible resource pricing we show that the intertemporal no arbitrage condition that arises if the durable good monopolist seller can commit to a price path mirrors the intertemporal no arbitrage condition if the monopsonist buyer of an exhaustible resource can commit to a price path the intuition is that the durable good monopolist initially announces high future prices to get high valuation buyers to buy early and subsequently lowers the price to attract additional buyers on the other hand the monopsonist buyer of the exhaustible resource initially announces low future prices to encourage sellers to supply their units early and subsequently as the stock of the resource declines raises the price to call forth additional supply as the period of commitment shrinks to zero the durable good s price drops to its marginal cost and the exhaustible resource s price jumps to its choke level all in a twinkling of the eye a