tax competition in federations and the welfare consequences of decentralization abstract this paper explores the impact of intensified tax competition within federal systems characterized by the presence of both horizontal tax externalities between the states and vertical tax externalities between states and federal government it shows that although these push tax rates in opposite directions horizontal towards state taxes that are too low vertical towards state taxes that are too high leaving the net outcome unclear intensified tax competition always worsens their combined effect that is intensified lower level tax competition in the form of an increase in the number of lower level jurisdictions is sure to reduce welfare but this is not because as usually supposed it makes excessively low state taxes even lower rather it is welfare reducing either for that reason or because it makes excessively high state taxes even higher

fiscal federalism quantitative studies we often think of fiscal decisions as being made by a single government but in the united states the reality is that an astounding number of entities have the power to tax and spend state local and federal governments all play crucial roles in the u s fiscal system and the interrelation has been the source of continuing controversy this fact is the focus of the seven papers and commentaries presented in this volume the result of a conference sponsored by the nber the contributors use various quantitative tools to study policy issues obtaining results that will interest policymakers and researchers working in the areas of taxation and public finance the first three papers study the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government john joseph wallis and wallace e oates look at the extend and evolution of decentralization in the state and local sector robert p inman examines the growth of federal grants and the structure of congressional decision making and jeffrey s zax investigates the effects of the number of government jurisdictions on aggregate local public debt and expenditures the next three papers look at the deductibility of state and local taxes on federal tax returns using an econometric analysis douglas holtz eakin and harvey s rosen examine the effects of deductibility on revenue sources and level of expenditures lawrence b lindsey looks at how deductibility affects the level and type of taxation george r zodrow uses a two sector general equilibrium model to investigate revenue effects of deductibility finally charles r hulten and robert m schwab analyze the problem of developing an accurate estimate of income for the state and local sector finding that conventional accounting procedures have underestimated the income generated by a startling 100 billion

is there a leviathan in your neighborhood this paper measures effects of decentralization in local government hierarchies on local public sector size this sector shrinks if decentralization encourages competition among governments it expands if decentralization sacrifices scale economies in a sample of 3 022 counties larger county governments reduce competition and increase aggregate local public sector size relative to aggregate county income more cities and towns increase competition and reduce its size more special and school districts sacrifice scale economies and increase it two recent articles have attempted to identify the effects of decentralization in state and local government on the size of the state and local public sector wallace oates 1985 finds no important effects michael nelson 1987 finds modest evidence that increased competition among government units reduces the size of the public sector this article demonstrates that the effects of decentralization are important and complex decentralization which encourages competition reduces the size of the local public sector decentralization which discourages scale economies increases it

a theory of interregional tax competition a general equilibrium model is constructed to study tax competition where local governments compete for capital by holding down property tax rates and public expenditure levels an exact definition of tax competition is provided and both the existence and nonexistence of tax competition are shown to be theoretically possible it is argued however that tax competition must occur under empirically reasonable conditions inefficiency in public production is also explicitly modeled the amount of capital used to produce a given level of public service output is shown to be greater than that which is required to minimize costs evaluated at the prices facing private firms

asymmetric quantile analysis of the swedish mortgage price discovery process based on swedish banking data we discover robust and significantly positive asymmetric price transmission apt effects over all analysed regression quantiles of our mortgage interest rates with even larger positive apt for the higher percentiles the analysis was enabled through unique access to a swedish bank s seb own records of their true borrowing costs our central contribution is that there is a higher propensity for the bank to rapidly increase its mortgage interest rates for customers following an increase in its borrowing costs compared with the propensity for the bank to decrease its customers mortgage rates subsequent to a corresponding borrowing cost decrease

interest rate pass through and asymmetric adjustment evidence from the federal funds rate operating target period this study examines the long run interest rate pass through of the federal funds rate to the prime rate and whether there is asymmetric adjustment in the prime rate using the enders siklos 2001 momentum threshold autoregressive model over the period february 1987 to october 2005 once allowance is made for the endogenously determined structural break in the cointegrating relationship in april 1996 the adjustment of the prime rate to changes in the federal funds rate appears asymmetric with upward rigidity a result contrary to previous studies which found that the prime rate exhibits downward rigidity the finding of upward rigidity in the prime rate lends support for the customer reaction and adverse selection hypotheses moreover the empirical evidence seems to support the observation of increased pass through as a result of heightened competition in the banking industry as well as the federal reserve s enhanced transparency in monetary policy during the 1990s

fiscal decentralization and government size numerous studies have attempted to model the possible factors contributing to universal growth in public sectors this paper analyzes one device that appears capable of controlling some of that growth fiscal decentralization the results reported here also support the use of monopoly government assumptions in models of public policy

cooking fuel choice in rural china results from microdata abstract unclean cooking fuel is widely used in the developing world and it is the main indication of energy poverty in rural china in this paper we investigate the situation transition and determination of fuel choice in china s rural household cooking using the large scale micro survey data of china health and retirement longitudinal study charls we find that there is a big gap in using commercial cooking fuels between rural and urban households 60 of the rural households adopt traditional biomass resource as their main fuel for cooking in 2011 while this figure is less than 5 in the urban we also identify a significant spatial divide in fuel choice in southeastern coastal areas about 40 of the rural households prefer solid fuels while this figure jumps to over 80 in northeastern areas the longitudinal data also reveal a significant transition from traditional to modern fuels from 2008 to 2012 moreover the distance to the most commonly used farmer s market education background coal price and female labor participation are all influential in determining the households choices

the political economy of new deal fiscal federalism in 1930 the average american received somewhat more than 50 percent of his government services from local government 20 percent from state government and the remainder from the federal government by 1940 this pattern had been reversed with the federal government supplying roughly 50 percent state government 20 percent and local government 30 percent figure 1 shows how shares of non military expenditures by the three levels of government shifted dramatically away from local governments toward the national government during the decade the same was true of revenues this transition in the relative importance of state federal and local government was dramatic and from the perspective of the 1990s permanent figure 1 omitted the most important cause of the shift in fiscal terms was the implementation of national relief programs under the new deal the federal emergency relief administration fera the works progress administration wpa the social security programs and others between 1932 and 1940 direct relief expenditures account for roughly 45 percent of the growth in national expenditures 60 percent of the growth in state expenditures and 20 percent of the growth in local expenditures almost all of which came from federal and state grants for relief purposes even more revealing are the figures for the period between 1932 and 1935 in those three years national government expenditures rose by slightly less than 2 billion while expenditures for relief alone reached 2 2 billion in 1935 from zero in 1932 1 the increase in federal expenditures was significant but an important reason why state and national governments grew but local governments did not lay in the fiscal structure of the relief programs the extensive use of matching grants to finance relief expenditures created incentives for states to expand their fiscal effort while local governments were effectively able to substitute national and state relief grants for their own funds matching grants also allowed the states to control the amount spent in each program the national government was and is still today unable to control expenditures on these programs or to equalize welfare standards across states open ended matching grants entitled the states to unencumbered access to the federal treasury 2 the programs also permanently altered the american welfare system the categorical assistance programs of the social security act brought about a basic realignment of financial and administrative responsibilities between the federal state and local governments old age assistance aid to dependent children and aid to the blind were independently administered by state governments the act contained strong restrictions on the ability of the social security board to influence the administration of programs within the states explicitly forbidding the board to set personnel policies 3 why were open ended matching grants and a decentralized administrative structure adopted rather than some other institutional form public finance theory suggests that it may have been the best way for the federal government to support relief expenditures without discouraging continued state and local participation matching grants are usually proposed as a remedy to problems of externalities in this case the spillover is the movement of persons seeking relief from low benefit to high benefit states they solve the externality problem through the use of fiscal incentives as gramlich 1977 276 notes for matching grants the central government is expressly trying to stimulate spending in a certain area as we will see below matching grants did have this effect federal grants expanded rapidly but the state and local sector did not substitute federal grant moneys for state and local tax dollars on a large scale recent empirical studies of matching grants indicate that they result in somewhat less spending than the size of the grant indicating that state and local governments reduce their own expenditures on grant programs slightly in the presence of matching grants in contrast to lump sum grants where state and local governments are able to substitute significant amounts of federal grants for their own tax dollars

some evidence on the effect of the separation of spending and taxing decisions it is often argued that separation of public spending and taxing decisions engenders in the voter overoptimistic hopes that someone else will bear the cost of public services thereby inducing an increase in the size of government but are perceived tax prices systematically and persistently reduced by separation although in stock markets all agents expectations may be unbiased they may or may not be unbiased in political markets this paper analyzes the separation created in federal states when the central government finances local expenditures evidence from a dynamic decisive voter model is presented that indicates that the separation introduced by federal grants to canadian provinces did in fact reduce the perceived tax price of provincial public services and raise provincial expenditures the results suggest also that the effect of separation diminished over time

does federalism lead to excessively high taxes the relative strengths of vertical and horizontal tax externalities turn on the balance between the interest responsiveness of the supply of savings and demand for capital the extent to which immobile factors are taxed by the states and the strength of preferences between federal and state expenditures the vertical externality will dominate if the aggregate tax base of the federation is responsible to the state tax instrument tax interactions in federations are more complex than has often been supposed

how does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate national and subnational government size abstract beyond conducting the usual regression analysis of the relationship between fiscal decentralization and aggregate government size national and subnational combined this paper makes the first attempt to examine how different fiscal decentralization measures affect the sizes of national and subnational state and local combined governments an econometric analysis using panel data from 32 industrial and developing countries 1980 1994 finds that 1 expenditure decentralization leads to smaller national governments larger subnational governments and larger aggregate governments 2 revenue decentralization increases subnational governments by less than it reduces national governments hence leads to smaller aggregate governments and 3 vertical imbalance tends to increase the sizes of subnational national and aggregate governments

federalism and the growth of government revisited recent research in public economics has been testing for a relationship in federal states between the decentralization of governments and the total and individual size of government shares in gnp according to one view economic theory offers no unambiguous empirical predictions provided there is a competitive political environment at each government level the rivalry between political parties will result in an outcome that conforms approximately to the preferences of the citizens as interpreted in the conventional median voter model under this scenario it is not certain what differences might be caused by more decentralization oates 1985 to determine any difference we would have to possess considerable knowledge about the distribution of tastes and the location of the populace it has been hypothesized nevertheless that increased decentralization could result in a higher level of government expenditure quoting the economic historian john wallis oates 1985 749 suggests that since individuals have more control over public decisions at the local than at the state or national level they will wish to empower the public sector with a wider range of functions and responsibility where these activities are carried out at more localizedlevels of government

federalism as a commitment to reserving market incentives the authors advance a new perspective in the study of federalism their approach views federalism as a governance solution of the state to credibly preserving market incentives market incentives are preserved if the state is credibly prevented from compromising on future economic success and from bailing out future failures the salient features of federalism decentralization of information and authority and interjurisdictional competition help provide credible commitment or these purposes in addition the authors suggest that some federalism are self sustaining

fiscal decentralization and the size of government a european country empirical analysis this article is an original contribution to the understanding of the relationship between fiscal decentralization and government size using a panel data set of the eu 15 countries we analyse the effect of decentralization on aggregate national and subnational government sizes by separating the long run effects of decentralization from its short run dynamics in the long run tax autonomy reduces central expenditure but increases and to a greater extent subnational public expenditure leading to higher aggregate public expenditure we find also that vertical imbalances tend to increase the sizes of subnational national and aggregate governments

vertical versus horizontal tax externalities an empirical test abstract we study taxation externalities in federations of benevolent governments where different hierarchical government levels tax the same base one can observe two types of externalities a horizontal externality working among governments of the same level and leading to tax rates that are too low compared to the social optimum and a vertical externality working between different levels of government and leading to suboptimally high tax rates building on the model of keen and kotsogiannis keen michael j kotsogiannis christos 2002 does federalism lead to excessively high taxes american economic review 92 1 363 370 we derive a discriminating hypothesis to distinguish vertical and horizontal tax externalities based on measurable variables this test is applied to a panel data set on local taxes in a sample of swiss municipalities that feature direct democratic fiscal decision making so as to maximize the correspondence with the benevolent governments of the theory we find that vertical externalities dominate they are thus an observed empirical phenomenon as well as a notable extension to the theory of tax competition

an empirical analysis of state and local tax structure in the context of the leviathan model of government this paper has investigated the ability of an extreme and relatively simple model of political behavior to explain the level of revenues generated by state and local governments in general the behavior of these governments appears to be at least consistent with many of the fiscal outcomes predicted by the leviathan theory several although not all of the specific leviathan theory hypotheses considered received empirical support the evidence was consistent with the hypothesis that states utilizing comprehensive tax bases especially a personal income tax can be expected to generate higher levels of aggregate revenues strong support was also observed for the contention that intergovernmental competition by general purpose substate governments may serve as a substitute for constitutional constraints in limiting the revenue generating power of local governments

the power to tax analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution preface 1 taxation in constitutional perspective 2 natural government a model of leviathan 3 constraints on base and rate structure 4 the taxation of commodities 5 taxation through time income taxes capital taxes and public debt 6 money creation and taxation 7 the disposition of public revenues 8 the domain of politics 9 open economy federalism and taxing authority 10 toward authentic tax reform prospects and prescriptions epilogue notes selected bibliography index

decentralisation as an incentive scheme recent changes have introduced more decentralization in a number of traditionally centralized countries 1 in the case of france it is sometimes claimed that the 1982 1983 reform of subcentral government is of historical importance although the principles of that reform are not contested any more by the new majority elected in 1986 opinions still differ on a number of policy issues some of the issues are presented in this introductory section but the main purpose of this paper is not to expose or discuss in detail the problems of decentralization in france as argued in the second part of the introductory section the theoretical framework in which the policy issues of decentralization are usually discussed by economists is somewhat unsatisfactory in particular when applied to unitary states such as britain or france the bulk of the paper is devoted to the exploration of a different approach to decentralization it is not purported however that this approach could completely replace the more traditional one consequently when in the concluding section we return briefly to the policy issues identified here this is to be read as a preliminary attempt to evaluate the relevance of the reasoning developed in the paper

pigou tiebout property taxation and the underprovision of local public goods abstract pigou s proposition that the use of distorting taxes rather than neutral head taxes reduces public service levels is examined in this paper a simple model with a national system of competing local governments is utilized to demonstrate that the use of a distorting property tax on mobile capital decreases the level of residential public services the case where public services are an intermediate producer good is also considered

the efficiency of the scandinavian banking sector a wavelet quantile regression analysis in this article the scandinavian housing financing market is analysed in order to determine whether the interest rate price discovery processes of denmark norway and sweden are efficient based o

reviving leviathan fiscal federalism and the growth of government this article revisits the influential leviathan hypothesis which pos its that tax competition limits the growth of government spending in decentralized countries i use panel data to examine the effect of fiscal decentralization over time within countries attempting to distinguish between decentralization that is funded by intergovernmental transfers and local taxation first i explore the logic whereby decentralization should restrict government spending if state and local governments have wide ranging authority to set the tax base and rate especially on mobile assets in countries where this is most clearly the case decentralization is associated with smaller government second consistent with theoretical arguments drawn from wel fare economics and positive political economy i show that governments grow faster as they fund a greater portion of public expenditures through intergovernmental transfers

designing tax policy in federalist economies an overview abstract the emerging economic federations of the european union russia and south africa along with the established federations in australia canada and the united states confront the task of designing the institutions for federal fiscal policy this paper reviews the literature on the design of tax policy in federalist economies we conclude that taxation by lower level governments can lead to significant economic inefficiencies and inequities the usual assignment view of federalis recommends central government policies for example resident based taxation or grants in aid to correct these failures these recommendations assume that the central government will act as a benevolent social planner the political economy view of federalism suggests that this assumption is in error and that additional federalist institutions must be considered alternative legislative structures and constitutional rules are considered

incumbent behavior vote seeking tax setting and yardstick competition this paper develops a model of the political economy of tax setting in a multijurisdictional world where voters choices and incumbent behavior are determined simultaneously voters are assumed to make comparisons between jurisdictions to overcome political agency problems this forces incumbents into a yardstick competition in which they care about what other incumbents are doing we provide a theoretical framework and empirical evidence using u s state data from 1960 to 1988 the results are encouraging to the view that vote seeking and tax setting are tied together through the nexus of yardstick competition

property taxation as incentive for cost control empirical evidence for utility services in norway recent theoretical research suggests that property taxation has incentive effects that can help control cost problems in the public sector the institutional setting in norway allows this first empirical investigation of the incentive effect of property taxation since we can separate between local governments with and without property tax the raw data of the variation in the unit cost level for utilities show that local governments with property tax have about 20 lower unit cost using both linear regression and propensity score matching we are not able to wash out the difference in unit costs our interpretation is that having a visible and controversial local tax related to property stimulates voter interest in local government activities and thereby may help cost control the incentive effect is of interest for the design of fiscal federalism

an optimal taxation approach to fiscal federalism in a federal system of government each unit of government decides independently how much of each type of public good to provide and what types of taxes and which tax rates to use in funding the public goods in this paper we explore what types of problems can arise from this decentralized form of decision making in particular we describe systematically the types of externalities that one unit of government can create for nonresidents through both its public goods decisions and its taxation decisions the paper also explores briefly what the central government might do to lessen the costs of decentralized decision making

second generation fiscal federalism the implications of fiscal incentives abstract first generation fiscal federalism fgff studies the performance of decentralized systems under the assumption of benevolent social planners second generation fiscal federalism sgff studies performance based on the fiscal and political incentives facing subnational officials the paper focuses on three aspects of sgff first it considers the design of intergovernmental transfers while fgff emphasizes correcting vertical and horizontal equity sgff emphasizes the importance of fiscal incentives for producing local economic prosperity sgff extends fgff approaches by showing how non linear transfer systems can produce both equalization and high marginal fiscal incentives to produce local economic growth second the paper raises the fiscal incentive approach showing how different tax systems produce different fiscal incentives for political officials to choose policies third the paper discusses the interaction of democracy and fiscal federalism

tax decentralization and local government size this paper investigates the relationship between fiscal federalism and the sizes of local governments while many empirical studies emphasized that grants encourage the growth of local public spending and local taxes constrain it they are more silent regarding the effects of different types of tax autonomy the paper addresses this issue by arguing that tax decentralization as organized on tax bases used only by local governments tax separation rather than on tax base sharing would restrain local public expenditures using an unbalanced panel of oecd countries the key finding is that only property taxes mostly based on a tax separation scheme seem to favor smaller local governments thus while tax decentralization is a necessary condition for limiting the growth of local governments it does not appear sufficient as tax separation schemes among government levels would in fact be required

fiscal decentralization and government size an extension this paper analyzes one method governments employ to circumvent the discipline of a competitive system of fiscal federalism intergovernmental collusion in the form of intergovernmental grants grants it is argued serve to encourage the expansion of the public sector by concentrating taxing powers in the hands of the central government and by weakening the fiscal discipline imposed on governments forced to self finance their expenditures the results reported suggest that intergovernmental grants do encourage growth in the public sector the results offer further support for the use of monopoly government assumptions in public sector modeling

symmetric versus asymmetric interest rate adjustment mechanisms the prime rate below prime lending and the commercial paper rate abstract alternative interest rate adjustment mechanisms are considered to explain variation in the spread between the prime rate and the commercial paper rate and the phenomenon of below prime lending

does fiscal decentralization constrain leviathan new evidence from local property tax competition this paper reexamines whether fiscal decentralization constrains leviathan government using panel data for pennsylvania we compare actual property tax rates to the leviathan revenue maximizing rates for municipalities school districts and counties using spatial econometric methods we also estimate the degree of spatial dependence at the three levels of local government we find that fiscal decentralization results in stronger intergovernmental competition and lower tax rates we also find evidence of collusion among school districts that exhibit high interdependence but also high tax rates this calls into question the current literature s blind use of spatial dependence as a measure of intergovernmental competition

the empirical analysis of fiscal illusion this paper examines the empirical analysis of the five main hypotheses subsumed under the generic term fiscal illusion after placing these hypotheses within a common theoretical framework the paper attempts to evaluate empirical research into the revenue complexity hypothesis the revenue elasticity hypothesis the flypaper effect renter illusion and debt illusion

searching for leviathan an empirical study in several papers and a recent book geoffrey brennan and james buchanan 1977 1978 1980 have put forth a striking and controversial view of the public sector drawing by analogy on the conventional theory of monopoly in the private sector they envision a monolithic government that systematically seeks to exploit its citizenry through the maximization of the tax revenues that it extracts from the economy from this perspective they develop a fiscal constitution whose central purpose is to constrain leviathan by limiting in various ways its access to tax and other fiscal instruments while the leviathan hypothesis has been the source of lively debate and a wide range of policy proposals it has not been the subject of much systematic empirical work or testing this is a matter of some importance since the policy implications of the leviathan view are disturbing to put it mildly in particular brennan and buchanan virtually stand on their heads many of the basic theorems in public finance for an efficient and equitable tax system if in fact the leviathan view is an inaccurate depiction of the functioning of the public sector the introduction of their policy proposals is likely to make a sorry mess of the fiscal system the leviathan model does however have some straightforward implications for observable fiscal behavior it is the purpose of this paper to examine one of these testable implications brennan and buchanan stress that fiscal decentralization is itself a powerful constraint on leviathan competition among governments in the context of the interjurisdictional mobility of persons in pursuit of fiscal gains can offer partial or possibly complete substitutes for explicit fiscal constraints on the taxing power 1980 p 184 such competition among governments in a federal system that places heavy reliance on local fiscal decisions will greatly limit the capacity of leviathan to channel resources into the public sector in short as indicated by the epigraph to this paper the leviathan model implies that other things equal the size of the public sector should vary inversely with the extent of fiscal decentralization 2

fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending much attention has been given to the impact of fiscal competition on the level of public expenditure but relatively little to the impact on its composition using a broadly familiar and reasonably rich model of fiscal competition in the presence of mobile capital this paper establishes a systematic bias in public spending patterns starting from the non cooperative equilibrium and holding tax rates constant welfare would be improved by a coordinated reduction in the provision of local public inputs and a corresponding increase in the public provision of local public goods benefiting immobile consumers c 1997 elsevier science s a