preferred risk habitat of individual investors abstract the preferred risk habitat hypothesis introduced here is that individual investors select stocks whose volatilities are commensurate with their risk aversion the data 1995 2000 holdings of over 20 000 clients at a large german broker are consistent with the predictions of the hypothesis the returns of stocks within each portfolio have remarkably similar volatilities when stocks are sold they are replaced by stocks of similar volatilities and the more risk averse customers indeed hold less volatile stocks greater volatility specialization is associated with lower sharpe ratios primarily because more specialized investors hold fewer stocks and thereby expose themselves to more unsystematic risk

ex day behavior with dividend preference and limitations to short term arbitrage the case of swedish lottery bonds abstract swedish lottery bonds offer a unique opportunity to study ex day effects in an environment where cash distributions are tax advantaged relative to capital gains thus in the lottery bond market we observe a reversal of the preference for capital gains that researchers have cited as an explanation for the ex day behavior of u s equities further in this market there are barriers to short term arbitrage when prices do reflect the tax preferences of individual investors we find the bonds are priced around the ex day to reflect differential tax rates on income and capital gains consistent with the prevailing tax regimes the bonds consistently experience negative returns over the coupon payment period and in fact often sell at negative yields prior to the cash distribution as one would expect given tax motivated trading between high tax investors who buy prior to the distribution and low tax investors who buy after the distribution

cautious risk takers investor preferences and demand for active management actively managed mutual funds have distinct return distributions from their passive benchmarks and our theoretical analysis using tail sensitive risk preferences suggests that active value and growth funds may serve to reduce downside risk and capture upside potential respectively furthermore tail sensitivity measures estimated from the empirical pricing kernel have significant explanatory power for active fund flows even after controlling for business cycles and market wide sentiment finally active funds unlike their passive counterparts have exposures to option strategies hedging downside risk or capturing upside potential

non gaussian diversification when size matters abstract classical portfolio theory informs investors that they should have a large number of assets in their portfolios in order to diversify risk we show that the non gaussian features of stock return distribution may not allow for this risk protection in times of crisis moreover we demonstrate empirically that if investors are risk averse and consider higher order moments they have numerous incentives not to diversify their portfolios fully this is caused by the evolution of both large losses and asymmetry of returns when the numbers of assets in a portfolio change

risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in china abstract despite that insect resistant bt cotton has been lauded for its ability to reduce the use of pesticides studies have shown that chinese bt cotton farmers continue to use excessive amounts of pesticides using results from a survey and an artefactual field experiment we find that farmers who are more risk averse use greater quantities of pesticides we also find that farmers who are more loss averse use lesser quantities of pesticides this result is consistent with our conceptual framework and suggestive evidence where farmers behave in a loss averse manner in the health domain and place more weight on the importance of health over money in the loss domain

the rationale of the mean standard deviation analysis skewness preference and the demand for money publisher summary this chapter discusses the rationale of the mean standard deviation analysis skewness preference and the demand for money in january 1969 issue of the review of economic studies karl borch and martin feldstein separately criticized the widely used mean variance analysis of portfolio selection borch contended that any system of upward sloping mean standard deviation e s indifference curves can be shown to be inconsistent with the basic axiom of choice under uncertainty he pointed out that one can always pick any two points on an upward sloping indifference curve to represent two bernoulli distributions with probability 1 p of gaining the same amount x in both the cases and probability p of gaining y1 in the case of one distribution and y2 in the case of the second distribution with y2 y1 if the second distribution represents the point to the northeast of the other point then by the dominance axiom the second distribution must be preferred to the first which contradicts the basic meaning of indifference curves feldstein by using a log utility function and a lognormal distribution for investment outcome showed that e s indifference curves for a risk averter need not be convex downwards though upward sloping they would change from convex to concave once the standard deviation of the outcome exceeds the mean multiplied by on the face of it this seems to suggest that risk aversion might decrease as risk is increased beyond a certain extent

decreasing absolute risk aversion and utility indices derived from cake eating problems abstract this paper establishes the following characterization of decreasing absolute risk aversion dara utility indices j exhibits dara if and only if it is the indirect function corresponding to an infinite horizon cake eating problem for some nondecreasing and concave utility function of consumption the characterization is applied to the analysis of resource extraction under uncertainty and to an inverse optimal problem

a theory of disappointment aversion an axiomatic model of preferences over lotteries is developed it is shown that this model is consistent with the allais paradox includes expected utility theory as a special case and is only one parameter beta richer than the expected utility model allais paradox type behavior is identified with positive values of beta preferences with positive beta are said to be disappointment averse it is shown that risk aversion implies disappointment aversion and that the arrow pratt measures of risk aversion can be generalized in a straight forward manner to the current framework copyright 1991 by the econometric society

financial complexity and trade what are the implications on trading activity if investors are not sophisticated enough to understand and evaluate trades that have a complex payoff structure can frictions generated by this type of financial complexity be so severe that they lead to a complete market freeze like that of the recent financial crisis starting from an allocation that is not pareto optimal we find that whether complexity impedes trade depends on how investors perceive risk and uncertainty for smooth convex preferences such as subjective expected utility complexity cannot halt trade even in the extreme case where each investor is so unsophisticated that he can only trade up to one arrow debreu security without being able to combine two or more in order to construct a complex trade however for non smooth preferences which allow for kinked indifference curves such as maxmin expected utility complexity can completely shut down trade

individual preferences monetary gambles and stock market participation a case for narrow framing we argue that narrow framing whereby an agent who is offered a new gamble evaluates that gamble in isolation may be a more important feature of decision making than previously realized our starting point is the evidence that people are often averse to a small independent gamble even when the gamble is actuarially favorable we find that a surprisingly wide range of utility functions including many nonexpected utility specifications have trouble explaining this evidence but that this difficulty can be overcome by allowing for narrow framing our analysis makes predictions as to what kinds of preferences can most easily address the stock market participation puzzle

cumulative prospect theory option returns and the variance premium the variance premium and the pricing of out of the money otm equity index options are major challenges to standard asset pricing models we develop a tractable equilibrium model with cumulative prospect theory cpt preferences that can overcome both challenges the key insight is that the variance premium can be written as the expected return on a portfolio of otm call and put options and the probability weighting feature of cpt can explain the puzzlingly low returns observed for these options using gmm on a sample of u s index option returns between 1996 and 2010 we show that the cpt model ts well observed option prices and therefore the variance premium in a dynamic setting probability weighting and time varying equity return volatility combine to match the observed time series pattern of the variance premium

naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans there is a worldwide trend toward defined contribution saving plans and growing interest in privatized social security plans in both environments individuals are given some responsibility to make their own asset allocation decisions raising concerns about how well they do at this task this paper investigates one aspect of the task namely diversification it is shown that some investors follow the 1 n strategy they divide their contributions evenly across the funds offered in the plan consistent with this naive notion of diversification it is found that the proportion invested in stocks depends strongly on the proportion of stock funds in the plan

home bias in open economy financial macroeconomics standard theory would predict that investors hold a well diversified portfolio of equities across the world but despite the process of financial globalization investors still hold a disproportionate share of local equities in their portfolio the equity home bias french and poterba 1991 we review the various explanations of this puzzling phenomenon in the context of recent developments in macroeconomic modelling that have allowed to incorporate sophisticated international portfolio choices in standard two country general equilibrium models we refer to this literature as open economy financial macroeconomics we focus on three broad classes of explanations i hedging motives in frictionless financial markets real exchange rate and non tradable income risk ii asset trade costs in international financial markets such as transaction costs differences in tax treatments between national and foreign assets iii informational frictions and behavioural biases these recent developments raise the need for new portfolio facts beyond the equity home bias and we will present some new evidence on cross border asset holdings across different types of assets equities bonds and bank lending we also present some new micro data on institutional holdings of equity at the fund level these data should inform macroeconomic modelling of the open economy and a growing literature of models of delegated investment

behavioral portfolio theory we develop a positive behavioral portfolio theory bpt and explore its implications for portfolio construction and security design the optimal portfolios of bpt investors resemble combinations of bonds and lottery tickets consistent with friedman and savage s 1948 observation we compare the bpt efficient frontier with the mean variance efficient frontier and show that in general the two frontiers do not coincide optimal bpt portfolios are also different from optimal capm portfolios in particular the capm twofund separation does not hold in bpt we present bpt in a single mental account version bpt sa and a multiple mental account version bpt ma bpt sa investors integrate their portfolios into a single mental account while bpt ma investors segregate their port folios into several mental accounts bpt ma portfolios resemble layered pyramids where layers are associated with aspirations we explore a two layer portfolio where the low aspiration layer is designed to avoid poverty while the high aspiration layer is designed for a shot at riches

do finance professors invest like everyone else comparing the results of the fed s survey of consumer finances with those of a survey of finance professors at u s universities the authors found that finance professors are significantly more likely than others to invest in equities they also found that finance professors are less prone to behavioral biases because their decision not to invest in equities is based on neither the outcome of their past investments nor their short term expectations of the market see comments and response on this article

life cycle portfolio choice the role of heterogeneous under diversification the empirical work on household portfolio choice documents two facts one the stock market participation rate is low and hump shaped over the life cycle two the conditional share of stocks is also low but does not appear to change much during the life cycle in contrast the standard life cycle portfolio choice model predicts high and monotonically increasing participation rates and conditional stock shares that are low and exhibit dramatic changes with age in this paper i consider a number of extensions to this basic framework i find that a small per period participation cost is needed to generate a hump shaped life cycle profile of participation rates under a realistic calibration the quantitative effect is minor progressive social security and the assumption that the risk of stock portfolios is declining in household wealth as a consequence of better diversification opportunities an assumption that has some empirical support though provide substantial amplification and significantly improve the ability of the model to match the data under diversification also reduces the average portfolio share of stocks conditional on participation and together with the intergenerational transmission of wealth makes it insensitive to age consistent with the empirical evidence

a theory of anticipated utility abstract a new theory of cardinal utility with an associated set of axioms is presented it is a generalization of the von neumann morgenstern expected utility theory which permits the analysis of phenomena associated with the distortion of subjective probability

diversification versus optimality is there really a diversification puzzle abstractin this paper we provide a general valuation of the diversification attitude of investors first we empirically examine the diversification of mean variance optimal choices in the us stock market during the 11 year period 2003 2013 we then analyze the diversification problem from the perspective of risk averse investors and risk seeking investors second we prove that investors optimal choices will be similar if their utility functions are not too distant independent of their tolerance or aversion to risk finally we discuss investors attitude towards diversification when the choices available to investors depend on several parameters

linking the technological regime to the technological catch up analyzing korea and taiwan using the us patent data this article examines the relationship between the technological regime and the technological catch up using us patent data this study first extends the notion of technological regimes as more appropriate for the catching up context before it goes on to develop the quantitative expressions of technological regime variables then it investigates in which technological classes technological catch up tends either to occur or not to occur and what affects the speed of the catch up this study has found that catching up is more likely to happen in those technological classes with shorter technological cycle time and more initial stock of knowledge and that among those candidate classes the actual speed of catch up varies depending on appropriability and knowledge accessibility this implies that the factors that determine the occurrence of catch up and the speed of catch up are different comparing the level of technological capability of the advanced and catching up economies the article has found that catching up countries tend to achieve high levels in the technological sectors with shorter cycle time easier access to knowledge and higher appropriability whereas the advanced countries show the exactly opposite performances the study also confirms the organizational selection hypothesis such that the firms of different organizations and strategies show divergent degrees of fitness in the different environment or technological regime we find that the korean firms find themselves more fitted to technological regimes featured by low appropriability and high cumulativeness persistence whereas the taiwanese firms are more fitted to technological regimes featured by high appropriability and low cumulativeness persistence our findings are consistent with the following characterization of the firms in korea and taiwan the korean firms dominated by the so called chaebols especially in patent registrations are characterized as less flexible large diversified conglomerates and pursing more independent r d and learning strategies the taiwanese firms are characterized as more flexible network based specialized firms and pursuing more cooperative r d and learning strategies copyright 2006 oxford university press

loss aversion in aggregate macroeconomic time series abstract prospect theory has been the focus of increasing attention in many fields of economics however it has scarcely been addressed in macroeconomic growth models neither on theoretical nor on empirical grounds in this paper we use prospect theory in a stochastic optimal growth model thereafter the focus lies on linking the euler equation obtained from a prospect theory growth model of this kind to real macroeconomic data we will use generalized method of moments gmm estimation to test the implications of such a non linear prospect utility euler equation our results indicate that loss aversion can be traced in aggregate macroeconomic time series

household portfolio diversification a case for rank dependent preferences the proliferation of novel preference theories in financial economics is hampered by a lack of non experimental evidence and by the theories additional complexity which has not been shown to be critical in applications in this article i present arguments in support of preferences with rank dependency using the survey of consumer finances data i document two widespread patterns inconsistent with expected utility i many households simultaneously invest in well deversified funds and in poorly diversified portfolios of stocks and ii some households with substantial savings do not invest anything in equities i show that portfolio choice models with rank dependent preferences plausibly parameterized and under fully rational assumptions are quantitatively consistent with the observed diversification these results call for further efforts to integrate the models of rank dependent preferences in portfolio theory and asset pricing the decision theoretic literature has long acknowledged the shortcomings of the expected utility theory of von neumann and morgenstern 1944 several generalizations of the theory are inspired by the experimental evidence and aimed at improving its descriptive accuracy however there are few applications of new models of preferences in finance and expected utility continues to dominate the field 1 two principal hurdles slow the proliferation of novel preferences in financial economics first the lack of empirical non experimental or field data confirming that the behavior motivating non expected utilities is widespread outside the laboratory settings second the additional and often significant complexity of the alternative preferences which has not been shown to be critical in applications where the models based on expected utility fall short of reasonable predictions this article presents empirical and theoretical this paper was previously circulated under the title household portfolio diversification the paper has benefited from the comments of shlomo benartzi luca benzoni markus brunnermeier john dickhaut maria perozek raj singh hersh shefrin and workshop participants at minnesota finance bag lunch 2003 wharton conference household financial decision making and portfolio choice and 2003 summer meetings of econometric society i would like to thank cam harvey the editor and an anonymous referee for many helpful comments and suggestions a special thanks to jack kareken for comments and editorial help on an earlier draft i am grateful to donna zerwitz for editorial assistance the views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily of the federal reserve bank of minneapolis or the federal reserve system all errors and omissions are the sole responsibility of the author address correspondence to valery polkovnichenko finance 3 122 csom 319 19 th

developments in non expected utility theory the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk this article reviews recent developments in the economic theory of individual decision making under risk since the 1950s it has been known that individual choices violate the standard model of expected utility in predictable ways considerable research effort has now been devoted to the project of developing a superior descriptive model following an overview of non expected utility theories which distinguishes between conventional and non conventional approaches the paper seeks to assess these alternative models in terms of empirical success using laboratory and field data and theoretical usefulness the closing sections reflect on some new directions emerging in this literature

international diversification a copula approach abstract the viability of international diversification involves balancing benefits and costs this balance hinges on the degree of asset dependence in light of theoretical research linking diversification and dependence we examine international diversification using two measures of dependence correlations and copulas we document several findings first dependence has increased over time second we find evidence of asymmetric dependence or downside risk in latin america but less in the g5 the results indicate very little downside risk in east asia third east asian and latin american returns exhibit some correlation complexity interestingly the regions with maximal dependence or worst diversification do not command large returns our results suggest international limits to diversification they are also consistent with a possible tradeoff between international diversification and systemic risk

examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives experimental evidence from the people s republic of china several experimental sessions were conducted to elicit certainty equivalents for a sequence of lotteries involving real monetary outcomes the opportunity to conduct sessions in the people s republic of china afforded the ability to offer very large monetary incentives relative to subjects living costs in the highest payoff condition subjects earned three times their normal monthly revenue in the course of a two hour experiment results indicate a statistically significant impact of the level of monetary incentives on revealed risk preferences however even under extreme monetary incentives subjects demanded amounts well in excess of expected value for low probability gain prospects copyright 1992 by american economic association

a simple preference foundation of cumulative prospect theory with power utility most empirical studies of rank dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory have assumed power utility functions both for gains and for losses as it turns out a remarkably simple preference foundation is possible for such models tail independence a weakening of comonotonic independence which underlies all rank dependent models together with constant proportional risk aversion suffice in the presence of common assumptions weak ordering continuity and first stochastic dominance to imply these models thus sign dependence the different treatment of gains and losses and the separation of decision weights and utility are obtained free of charge

all their eggs in one basket portfolio diversification of us households abstract this paper uses data from the survey of consumer finances to assess how well mean variance efficiency describes the portfolio diversification of us households it does not seem to work well the median stockholder owns a single publicly traded stock often in the company where he works looking at a sample of high income households who accounted for one third of all publicly traded stock the median holding is only ten stocks indirect stock ownership through mutual funds defined contribution pension plans ira s and trust funds is shown to have little power in explaining this poor diversification

diversification and its discontents idiosyncratic and entrepreneurial risk in the quest for social status social status concerns influence investors decisions by driving a wedge in attitudes toward aggregate and idiosyncratic risks i model such concerns by emphasizing the desire to get ahead of the joneses which implies that aversion to idiosyncratic risk is lower than aversion to aggregate risk the model predicts that investors hold concentrated portfolios in equilibrium which helps rationalize the small premium for undiversified entrepreneurial risk in the model status concerns are more important for wealthier households consequently these households own a disproportionate share of risky assets particularly private equity and experience greater volatility of consumption consistent with empirical evidence diversification and risk sharing are fundamental principles of modern finance and macroeconomics however empirical evidence suggests that household portfolios are poorly diversified with many people reporting substantial holdings of a single stock for the wealthiest households large shares in closely held businesses constitute a particularly important source of risk e g heaton and lucas 2000a it is not surprising that entrepreneurs bear substantial undiversified risk since it is important for mitigating moral hazard and or adverse selection problems yet from a standpoint of portfolio theory entrepreneurship does not appear to be well compensated implying that many investors are willing to take poorly rewarded risks despite the availability of superior investment opportunities such as public equity that earns a large risk premium e g moskowitz and vissing j0rgensen 2002 hall and woodward 2007

first order risk aversion and the equity premium puzzle abstract this paper integrates yaari s dual theory of choice under uncertainty into a multiperiod context and examines its implications for the equity premium puzzle an important property of these preferences is that of first order risk aversion which implies in our model that the risk premium for a small gamble is proportional to the standard deviation rather than the variance since the standard deviation of the growth rate in aggregate consumption is considerably larger than its variance the model can generate both a small risk free rate and a moderate equity premium