monitoring and competing principals a double edged sword abstract do monitoring technologies increase a principal s profits if she has to compete with others for an agent while monitoring improves the risk incentive tradeoff it also reduces the costs for a rivaling principal to offer a more attractive contract we show in a two action two outcome model that when the derivative of the agent s risk tolerance is smaller than one equilibrium profits are lower when monitoring is available if there is some competition when the derivative is larger than one equilibrium profits are higher when monitoring is available conversely the agent benefits from monitoring when the competition is intense but can be hurt when it is mild

risk aversion and prudence in rent seeking games this paper considers a common n agent symmetric rent seeking game it derives conditions so that risk aversion and risk always decrease rent seeking efforts these conditions hold for any regular contest success function when risk averse rent seekers are also prudent under n 2 prudence is a necessary and sufficient condition for risk aversion to decrease rent seeking efforts compared to risk neutrality an intuition for this result is given based on a self protection model

precautionary savings and self selection evidence from the german reunification experiment in the absence of complete insurance expected future income shocks lead prudent individuals to build up precautionary savings in order to avoid wide fluctuations in the consumption path the reaction of savings to expected future shocks is stronger the more risk averse an individual is risk aversion might influence not only the savings behavior of an individual facing a stochastic income path but it can also affect occupational choice in the first place in particular risk averse individuals might choose occupations that are associated with less risky income paths while less risk averse individuals might prefer occupations with higher income risk assessing the importance of self selection of individuals into occupations according to their risk aversion is difficult since risk aversion is usually unobserved yet failing to control for unobserved risk aversion in regressions of wealth on measures of labor income risk will lead to a bias if selfselection takes place since measures of labor income risk will be negatively correlated with the error term that is capturing the unobserved risk aversion this could lead to a rejection of the theory of precautionary savings even if individuals act according to the theory

standard risk aversion this paper introduces the concept of standard risk aversion a von neumann morgenstern utility function has standard risk aversion if any risk makes a small reduction in wealth more painful in the sense of an increased reduction in expected utility also makes any undesirable independent risk more painful it is shown that given monotonicity and concavity the combination of decreasing absolute risk aversion and decreasing absolute prudence is necessary and sufficient for standard risk aversion standard risk aversion is shown to imply not only pratt and zeckhauser s proper risk aversion individually undesirable independent risks always being jointly undesirable but also that being forced to face an undesirable risk reduces the optimal investment in a risky security with and independent return similar results are established for the effect of broad class of increases in one risk on the desirability of or optimal investment in a second independent risk

individual risk attitudes measurement determinants and behavioral consequences this paper studies risk attitudes using a large representative survey and a complementary experiment conducted with a representative subject pool in subjects homes using a question asking people about their willingness to take risks in general we find that gender age height and parental background have an economically significant impact on willingness to take risks the experiment confirms the behavioral validity of this measure using paid lottery choices turning to other questions about risk attitudes in specific contexts we find similar results on the determinants of risk attitudes and also shed light on the deeper question of stability of risk attitudes across contexts we conduct a horse race of the ability of different measures to explain risky behaviors such as holdings stocks occupational choice and smoking the question about risk taking in general generates the best all round predictor of risky behavior

monotone stochastic choice models the case of risk and time preferences suppose that when evaluating two alternatives x and y by means of a parametric utility function low values of the parameter indicate a preference for x and high values indicate a preference for y

dynamic procurement under uncertainty optimal design and implications for incomplete contracts we characterize the optimal dynamic contract for a long term basic service when an uncertain add on is required later on introducing firm risk aversion has two impacts profits for the basic service can be backloaded to induce cheaper information revelation for this service an income effect which reduces output distortions the firm must also bear some risk to induce information revelation for the add on this risk effect reduces the level of the add on but hardens information revelation for the basic service the interaction between these effects has important implications for the dynamics of distortions contract renegotiation and the value of incomplete contracts

testing expected utility in the presence of errors one possible conclusion from recent experimental research on decision making under risk is that observed behaviour can be reasonably accommodated by expected utility plus an error term this conclusion implies that the violation rate of expected utility should decrease if errors are excluded this article reports on an experiment which investigates this implication by presenting the same choice problems to subjects three times the results show that the exclusion of errors leads to a significant reduction of the violation rate for most of the cases this observation can be regarded as supporting evidence for expected utility plus error term the common consequence effect and the common ratio effect both introduced by allais 1953 are the most prominent and most investigated violations of expected utility eu they have motivated the development of alternative theories of choice under risk which are able to accommodate the observed behavioural patterns nowadays a large number of alternative theories exist see starmer 2000 sugden 2004 and schmidt 2004 for surveys and naturally the question arises which theory can explain observed behaviour best many studies have addressed this question most prominent seem to be those of harless and camerer 1994 and hey and orme 1994 since eu and its alternatives are deterministic theories but observed choices are stochastic both papers integrated an error term into their estimations this fact has aroused interest in a general discussion of the role of errors in decision making under risk the discussion can be disentangled into two issues the first issue concerns the modelling of the stochastic component harless and camerer 1994 hey and orme 1994 camerer and ho 1994 hey 1995 loomes and sugden 1995 and corresponding experimental tests carbone 1997 ballinger and wilcox 1997 loomes and sugden 1998 carbone and hey 2000 buschena and zilberman 2000 loomes et al 2002 the second issue concerns the performance of eu and its alternatives for given specifications of the error term in this context hey 1995 building upon the results of hey and orme 1994 arrives at the following conclusion

survey measures of risk aversion and prudence this paper utilizes a thought experiment conducted by the bank of italy to estimate absolute and relative risk aversion along with absolute and relative prudence for a broad cross section of italian households upper and lower bounds are calculated for each parameter and comparisons are made across socio demographic groups evidence is found of decreasing absolute risk aversion decreasing absolute prudence increasing relative risk aversion and increasing relative prudence

prudence with respect to ambiguity under expected utility prudence is equivalent to a positive third derivative of utility and plays a crucial role in precautionary saving behaviour eeckhoudt and schlesinger 2006 proposed behavioural definitions of prudence and of higher order risk preferences the present paper proposes a similar definition for prudence with respect to ambiguity i e situations in which objective probabilities are not available implications for several ambiguity models are derived ambiguity prudence is implied by hansen and sargent s 2001 multiplier preferences empirically correlates with financial behaviour and plays a key role in prevention behaviour this article is protected by copyright all rights reserved

changing risks and optimal effort consider a decision maker who can engage in effort to increase the probability of facing a better risky situation intuition suggests that effort should increase when there is a greater difference between the best risky situation and the worse one we show that this intuition is not necessarily valid and we consider the cases of risk averters and risk lovers

how important is precautionary saving we estimate how much of the wealth of a sample of psid respondents is held because some households face more income uncertainty than others we begin by solving a theoretical model of saving which we use to develop appropriate measures of uncertainty we then regress measures of wealth on our measures of uncertainty and find evidence that households engage in precautionary saving finally we simulate the wealth distribution that our empirical results imply would prevail if all households had the same uncertainty as the lowest uncertainty group we find that between 39 and 46 percent of wealth in our sample is attributable to the extra uncertainty that some consumers face compared to the lowest uncertainty group

contests as selection mechanisms the impact of risk aversion abstract we investigate how individual risk preferences affect the likelihood of selecting the more able contestant within a two player tullock contest our theoretical model yields two main predictions first an increase in the risk aversion of a player worsens her odds unless she already has a sufficiently large advantage second if the prize money is sufficiently large a less able but less risk averse contestant can achieve an equal or even higher probability of winning than a more able but more risk averse opponent in a laboratory experiment we confirm both the non monotonic impact and the compensating effect of risk aversion on winning probabilities our results suggest a novel explanation for the gender gap and the optimality of limited monetary incentives in selection contests

household saving micro theories and micro facts in this survey we review the recent theoretical and empirical literature on household saving and consumption the discussion is structured around a list of motives for saving and how well the standard theory captures these motives we show that almost all of the motives for saving that have been suggested in the informal saving literature can be captured in the standard optimizing model particular attention is given to recent work on the precautionary motive and its implications for saving and consumption behavior we also discuss the behavioral or psychological approach that eschews the use of standard optimization techniques and focuses instead on direct consideration on saving we provide a section on facts who save and how much we then discuss informally the recent decline in the u s saving rate and whether the theory is of much use in understanding this and other changes in aggregate saving rates over time we do not find any convincing explanation for the change in saving rates we also discuss some analyses of saving behavior over the life cycle addressing such questions as whether households save enough for retirement and whether the consumption patterns of older households can be rationalized within a simple life cycle model we also review a great number of studies of the consumption euler equations based on our analysis of the studies cited we conclude that there is still mixed evidence that consumption is excessively sensitive to income we also examine in depth the recent empirical literature on the precautionary motive we conclude that although some households do seem to have a significant precautionary motive at some points in their life cycle this motive is not so strong empirically as some investigators suggest

misplaced childhood when recession children grow up as central bankers abstract we examine how much an early i e childhood experience of recession influences the behavior of central bankers we develop a model of decision making by a committee whose leader and members exhibit recession aversion due to their personal experience the model reveals that recession aversion could lead to a reluctance of the policymaker to increase policy rates in a panel multinomial logit model for nine major central banks analyzed over the period 1999 2015 we find that growing up in a recession influences monetary policy making central bankers early personal experiences of recessions shape their policy reactions increasing the willingness to cut policy rates with policy relevant magnitudes the results are robust to alternative behavioral hypotheses accounting for a number of control variables or sample variation

putting risk in its proper place this paper examines preferences toward particular classes of lottery pairs we show how such concepts as prudence and temperance can be fully characterized by a preference relation over these lotteries if preferences are defined in an expected utility framework with differentiable utility the direction of preference for a particular class of lottery pairs is equivalent to signing the nth derivative of the utility function what makes our characterization appealing is its simplicity which seems particularly amenable to experimentation

precautionary saving and subjective earnings variance abstract in this paper i examine a model of precautionary saving and i show that the fact that people may insure against income risk makes it difficult to evaluate the extent of precautionary accumulation by simply looking at the relationship between wealth and earnings variance i also argue that occupations may represent a bad proxy for income risk

heterogeneity in risky choice behaviour in a broad population we analyse risk preferences using an experiment with real incentives in a representative sample of 1 422 dutch respondents our econometric model incorporates four structural parameters that vary with observed and unobserved characteristics utility curvature loss aversion preferences towards the timing of uncertainty resolution and the propensity to choose randomly rather than on the basis of preferences we find that all four parameters contribute to explaining choice behaviour the structural parameters are significantly associated with socio economic variables but it is essential to incorporate unobserved heterogeneity in each of them to match the rich variety of choice patterns in the data

are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability is the way that people make risky choices or tradeoffs over time related to cognitive ability this paper investigates whether there is a link between cognitive ability risk aversion and impatience using a representative sample of the population and incentive compatible measures we conduct choice experiments measuring risk aversion and impatience over an annual time horizon for a randomly drawn sample of roughly 1 000 german adults subjects also take part in two different tests of cognitive ability which correspond to sub modules of one of the most widely used iq tests interviews are conducted in subjects own homes we find that lower cognitive ability is associated with greater risk aversion and more pronounced impatience these relationships are significant and robust to controlling for personal characteristics educational attainment income and measures of credit constraints we perform a series of additional robustness checks which help rule out other possible confounds

ambiguity about audit probability tax compliance and taxpayer welfare we show that an increase in uncertainty about the probability of being audited ambiguity increases tax compliance for ambiguity averse taxpayers but reduces compliance for ambiguity lovers because experimental evidence reveals considerable heterogeneity with respect to ambiguity preferences we conclude that fostering uncertainty about the probability of being audited may not be an effective policy for increasing taxpayer compliance moreover because the tax authority can neither categorize nor screen taxpayers on the basis of their preferences for ambiguity it is not likely to be either a useful or a desirable instrument for increasing taxpayer welfare jel h26 d81

an experimental study of precautionary bidding auctions often involve goods exhibiting a common knowledge ex post risk in such auctions precautionary bidding predicts that under expected utility dara bidders reduce their bids by more than the appropriate risk premium because the degree of riskiness of an auctioned good and bidders levels of risk aversion are difficult to observe in field settings we conduct experimental auctions that allow us to identify the precautionary premium directly we find strong evidence for precautionary bidding the effect is robust to changes in experimental design features our experiment provides the first empirical demonstration of precautionary motives in a strategic setting

consistency of higher order risk preferences risk aversion a second order risk preference is a time proven concept in economic models of choice under risk more recently the higher order risk preferences of prudence third order and temperance fourth order also have been shown to be quite important while a majority of the population seems to exhibit both risk aversion and these higher order risk preferences a significant minority does not we show how both risk averse and risk loving behaviors might be generated by a simple type of basic lottery preference for either 1 combining good outcomes with bad ones or 2 combining good with good and bad with bad respectively we further show that this dichotomy is fairly robust at explaining higher order risk attitudes in the laboratory in addition to our own experimental evidence we take a second look at the extant laboratory experiments that measure higher order risk preferences and we find a fair amount of support for this dichotomy our own experiment also is the first to look beyond fourth order risk preferences and we examine risk attitudes at even higher orders

bargaining with a residual claimant an experimental study we conduct an experiment of two player bargaining in which the payo to one player is subject to ex post risk while the other player receives a xed payment eectively making the player exposed to risk a residual claimant contrary to intuition recent theoretical work argues that exposure to risk may actually be benecial to the residual claimant and we test this in a controlled lab experiment our results suggest that asymmetric exposure to risk creates dierent self serving notions of fairness for the two types of players which leads to bargaining conict and even disagreements residual claimants are able to extract a larger share of the pie when bargaining over a risky distribution moreover some residual claimants actually do better in an expected utility sense by being exposed to risk however contrary to the theoretical prediction it is the comparatively less risk averse residual claimants who appear to benet the most through their exposure to risk in a subsequent study where residual claimants are able to choose between a less risky or a more risky distribution over which to bargain few choose the riskier distribution except when the possibility of an ex pose fair split exists consistent with our earlier results the relatively less risk averse residual claimants are more likely to choose the riskier distribution

variation in risk seeking behaviour following large losses a natural experiment this study explores people s risk taking behaviour after having suffered large real world losses following a natural disaster using the margins of the 2011 australian floods brisbane as a natural experimental setting we find that homeowners who were victims of the floods and face large losses in property values are 50 more likely to opt for a risky gamble a scratch card giving a small chance of a large gain 500 000 than for a sure amount of comparable value 10 this finding is consistent with prospect theory predictions regarding the adoption of a risk seeking attitude after a loss

on skewed risks in economic models and experiments many of the most significant risks that people face in their lives are left skewed i e imply large losses with only small probability i characterize skewness in binary risks which are widely applied in both economic models and experiments moreover i provide an explicit re parametrization of binary risks in terms of their first three moments these results allow for the conducting of comparative statics analysis with regard to skewness and provide a useful tool for the calibration of lotteries in experiments i apply them to show that left skewed background risks give rise to a very strong precautionary saving motive and to collect additional laboratory evidence on skewness preference and risk seeking behavior

a note on the comparative statics approach to nth degree risk aversion jindapon and neilson 2007 propose a comparative statics approach to nth degree risk aversion they consider a decision problem where an agent incurs either a monetary or a utility cost to reduce the nth degree risk in his payoff they find that when the cost is monetary one agent always invests more in risk reduction than another if and only if the former is nth degree ross more risk averse than the latter but this is not the case when the cost takes the form of utility reductions we show that within an appropriately normalized risk reducing problem with a utility cost individuals relative optimal risk reducing efforts are also governed by the nth degree ross more risk aversion

noncognitive abilities and financial distress evidence from a representative household panel this paper provides evidence of how noncognitive abilities affect financial distress in a representative panel of households we find that people in the bottom quintile of noncognitive abilities are 10 times more likely to experience financial distress than those in the top quintile we provide evidence that this relation largely arises from worse financial choices and lack of financial insight by low ability individuals and reflects differential exposure to income shocks only to a lesser degree we mitigate endogeneity concerns using an iv approach and an extensive set of controls implications for policy and finance research are discussed received september 24 2017 editorial decision september 26 2018 by editor stijn van nieuwerburgh authors have furnished an internet appendix which is available on the oxford university press web site next to the link to the final published paper online

income risk borrowing constraints and portfolio choice economic theory suggests that uninsurable income risk and the expectation of future borrowing constraints can reduce the share of risky assets in a household s portfolio if the utility function exhibits decreasing absolute risk aversion and decreasing prudence an individual will reduce his exposure to rate of return risks when confronted with other independent risks if there are transaction costs the expectation of future borrowing constraints should induce individuals to keep a lower proportion of their wealth in the form of illiquid and risky assets the authors find support for these propositions in a cross section of italian households copyright 1996 by american economic association

risk lovers and the rent over investment puzzle in this paper we prove existence and uniqueness of equilibrium in a rent seeking contest given a class of heterogeneous risk loving players we explore the role third order risk attitude plays in equilibrium and find that imprudence is sufficient for risk lovers to increase rent seeking investment above the risk neutral outcome moreover we show that rent can be fully dissipated in a standard tullock contest played by a large number of risk lovers

portfolio choices and asset prices the comparative statics of ambiguity aversion we investigate the comparative statics of more ambiguity aversion as defined by klibanoff marinacci and mukerji 2005 in the context of the static two asset portfolio problem it is not true in general that more ambiguity aversion reduces the demand for the uncertain asset we exhibit some sufficient conditions to guarantee that ceteris paribus an increase in ambiguity aversion reduces the demand for the ambiguous asset and raises the equity premium for example this is the case when the set of plausible distributions of returns can be ranked according to the monotone likelihood ratio order we also show how ambiguity aversion distorts the price kernel in the alternative portfolio problem with complete markets for contingent claims

transactions cost economics and the multinational enterprise an assessment abstract this paper applies transactions cost principles to the multinational enterprise in order to ascertain its distinctive properties as a mode of economic organization the analysis helps identify just when and where contractual alternatives to the multinational firm are likely to be viable this turns out to depend upon the nature of the technology the regime of appropriability within which the firm operates and the characteristics of the markets in question transactions cost analysis is also extended to the multinational enterprise host country relationship implications for management and public policy are derived

the rich domain of uncertainty source functions and their experimental implementation we often deal with uncertain events for which no probabilities are known several normative models have been proposed descriptive studies have usually been qualitative or they estimated ambiguity aversion through one single number this paper introduces the source method a tractable method for quantitatively analyzing uncertainty empirically the theoretical key is the distinction between different sources of uncertainty within which subjective choice based probabilities can still be defined source functions convert those subjective probabilities into willingness to bet we apply our method in an experiment where we do not commit to particular ambiguity attitudes but let the data speak

higher order risk attitudes a review of experimental evidence abstract this paper reviews the recent but fast growing experimental literature on higher order risk attitudes after introducing the theoretical context we first review the basic evidence and empirical moderators of these risk attitudes we then discuss recent extensions to ambiguity time risk and multi attribute utility in the last part we review indirect evidence from applied economic decision tasks

prudence in bargaining the effect of uncertainty on bargaining outcomes abstract we investigate the outcome of bargaining when a player s pay off from agreement is risky we find that a risk averse player typically increases his equilibrium receipts when his pay off is made risky this is because the presence of risk makes individuals behave more patiently in bargaining strong analogies are drawn to the precautionary saving literature we show that the effect of risk on receipts can be sufficiently strong that a decreasingly risk averse player may be better off receiving a risky pay off than a certain pay off

risk aversion wealth and background risk we use household survey data to construct a direct measure of absolute risk aversion based on the maximum price a consumer is willing to pay for a risky security we relate this measure to consumer s endowments and attributes and to measures of background risk and liquidity constraints we find that risk aversion is a decreasing function of the endowment thus rejecting cara preferences we estimate the elasticity of risk aversion to consumption at about 0 7 below the unitary value predicted by crra utility we also find that households attributes are of little help in predicting their degree of risk aversion which is characterized by massive unexplained heterogeneity we show that the consumer s environment affects risk aversion individuals who are more likely to face income uncertainty or to become liquidity constrained exhibit a higher degree of absolute risk aversion consistent with recent theories of attitudes toward risk in the presence of uninsurable risks jel d1 d8

exploring higher order risk effects higher order risk effects play an important role in examining economic behavior under uncertainty a precautionary demand for saving has been linked to the property of prudence and the property of temperance has been used to show how the presence of an unavoidable risk affects one s behavior towards a second risk these two properties also play key roles in aversion to negative skewness and to kurtosis respectively both properties recently have been characterized by preferences over lottery pairs in simple 50 50 gambles the simplicity of this characterization is ideal for experimental investigation this article reports the results of such experiments and concludes that there is behavioral evidence for prudence but not for temperance implications of these results for both expected utility and non expected utility models are examined

naivete based discrimination we initiate the study of naivete based discrimination the practice of conditioning offers on external information about consumers naivete knowing that a consumer is naive increases a monopolistic or competitive firm s willingness to generate inefficiency to exploit the consumer s mistakes so naivete based discrimination is not pareto improving can be pareto damaging and often lowers total welfare when classical preference based discrimination does not moreover the effect on total welfare depends on a hitherto unemphasized market feature the extent to which the exploitation of naive consumers distorts trade with different types of consumers if the distortion is homogeneous across naive and sophisticated consumers then under an arguably weak and empirically testable condition naivete based discrimination lowers total welfare in contrast if the distortion arises only for trades with sophisticated consumers then perfect naivete based discrimination maximizes social welfare although imperfect discrimination often lowers welfare if the distortion arises only for trades with naive consumers then naivete based discrimination has no effect on welfare we identify applications for each of these cases in our primary example a credit market with present biased borrowers firms lend more than is socially optimal to increase the amount of interest naive borrowers unexpectedly pay creating a homogeneous distortion the condition for naivete based discrimination to lower welfare is then weaker than prudence

even mixed risk lovers are prudent abstract the purpose of this note is to analyze properties of the risk lovers utility function beyond the positive sign of its second order derivative we show that contrarily to a priori beliefs

can uncertainty alleviate the commons problem global commons problems such as climate change are often affected by severe uncertainty the paper examines the effect of uncertainty on pollution emissions and welfare in a strategic context we find that emissions are always lower under uncertainty than under certainty reflecting risk reducing considerations we show that uncertainty can have a net positive impact on the welfare of risk averse polluters we extend the analysis to increases in risk increases in risk aversion and to risk heterogeneity jel d81 c72 q54 h23

developments in non expected utility theory the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk this article reviews recent developments in the economic theory of individual decision making under risk since the 1950s it has been known that individual choices violate the standard model of expected utility in predictable ways considerable research effort has now been devoted to the project of developing a superior descriptive model following an overview of non expected utility theories which distinguishes between conventional and non conventional approaches the paper seeks to assess these alternative models in terms of empirical success using laboratory and field data and theoretical usefulness the closing sections reflect on some new directions emerging in this literature

changes in background risk and risk taking behaviour economic decision making under uncertainty often takes place in the presence of multiple risks and in markets that are less than complete as a consequence choices about endogenous risks sometimes must be made while simultaneously facing one or more immutable exogenous background risks that are not under the control of the agent and that are independent of endogenous risks it is somehow natural to assume that an exogenous deterioration in background wealth will cause an individual to take more care elsewhere if we define a deterioration for example as making the individual poorer by removing a fixed amount of initial wealth we know from pratt 1964 that decreasing absolute risk aversion dara of an individual s von neumann morgenstern utility function yields this natural result if on the other hand background wealth becomes riskier due to the addition of a zero mean risk that is also statistically independent of all other risks behavior will be more risk averse if and only if preferences are risk vulnerable as defined by gollier and pratt 1996 risk vulnerability described below in section 4 is a stronger notion than dara and includes proper risk aversion pratt and zeckhauser 1987 and standard risk aversion eeckhoudt and kimball 1992 kimball 1993 as particular cases but a deterioration in background wealth may encompass more complicated distribution changes than the introduction of another statistically independent risk in this paper we examine background wealth deteriorations that take the form of both general firstand second degree stochastic dominance changes in risk fsd and ssd respectively in particular we determine conditions that are both necessary and sufficient for each of these two types of background risk changes to imply more risk averse behavior on the part of the individual for the case of fsd changes this condition turns out to be ross stronger characterization of decreasing absolute risk aversion in the case of general ssd changes in the distribution of background wealth the condition derived is a stronger version in ross sense of the conditions characterizing preferences that are locally risk vulnerable in the sense of gollier and pratt the necessary and sufficient conditions derived are fairly restrictive upon preferences however if we take as positive behavior that individuals act in a more risk averse manner whenever the distribution of background wealth deteriorates these conditions place canonical limits upon appropriate utility representations at the very least they

incentives in experiments a theoretical analysis experimental economists currently lack a convention for how to pay subjects in experiments with multiple tasks we provide a theoretical framework for analyzing this question assuming statewise mo

attitudes towards large income risk in welfare states an international comparison using survey data and the instrument developed by barsky et al we estimate the distribution of attitudes towards income risk in a country where many employment and health related risks are generously covered by a tax financed social insurance system norway in 2006 under a constant relative risk aversion assumption the sample average for the coefficient of relative risk aversion is 3 8 with standard deviation 2 3 this number is then contrasted to that for five other oecd countries where risk attitudes have been measured using the same instrument and also prior to the financial crisis chile france italy the netherlands and the usa when we relate this distribution for stated relative risk aversion to that for generosity of social insurance and the risks related to employment and health expenditure a picture emerges suggesting that more extensive welfare states induce higher risk tolerance for foreground risks a relationship that is in line with the theory on risk vulnerability

stock returns and volatility most asset pricing models postulate a positive relationship between a stock portfolio s expected returns and risk which is often modeled by the variance of the asset price this paper uses garch in mean models to examine the relationship between mean returns on a stock portfolio and its conditional variance or standard deviation after estimating a variety of models from daily and monthly portfolio return data we conclude that any relationship between mean returns and own variance or standard deviation is weak the results suggest that investors consider some other risk measure to be more important than the variance of portfolio returns

measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain we investigate univariate and multivariate risk preferences for health longevity and wealth we measure attitudes toward correlation and attitudes toward higher order dependence structures such as cross prudence and cross temperance making use of the risk apportionment technique proposed by eeckhoudt et al 2007 for multivariate gains we find correlation aversion and cross prudence in longevity and wealth for losses we observe correlation seeking and cross imprudence we do not find clear evidence for cross temperance our results indicate that longevity and wealth are considered to be substitutes for gains but not for losses second univariate higher order risk preferences are comparable for longevity and wealth although somewhat closer to linearity for wealth third we find evidence that attitudes toward dependence structures in the health domain are sign dependent

ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample using a theorem showing that matching probabilities of ambiguous events can capture ambiguity attitudes we introduce a tractable method for measuring ambiguity attitudes and apply it in a large representative sample in addition to ambiguity aversion we confirm an ambiguity component recently found in laboratory studies a insensitivity the tendency to treat subjective likelihoods as 50 50 thus overweighting extreme events our ambiguity measurements are associated with real economic decisions specifically a insensitivity is negatively related to stock market participation ambiguity aversion is also negatively related to stock market participation but only for subjects who perceive stock returns as highly ambiguous this paper was accepted by james smith decision analysis

testing for prudence and skewness seeking numerous theoretical predictions such as precautionary saving or preventive behavior have been derived for prudent decision makers further prudence can be characterized as downside risk aversion and plays a key role in preference for skewness we use a simple experimental method to test for prudence and skewness preference in the laboratory and compare the two to this end we introduce a novel graphical representation of compound lotteries that is easily accessible to subjects and test it for robustness using a factorial design prudence is observed on the aggregate and individual level we find that prudence does not boil down to skewness seeking we further provide some theoretical explanations for this result this paper was accepted by peter wakker decision analysis

experiential learning competitive selection and downside risk a new perspective on managerial risk taking it is part of managerial wisdom that managers need to take risks in order to succeed this is in stark contrast to the prominent agent based theories of experiential learning and competitive selection that are known to be biased against risky alternatives in the long run how can the positive managerial view on risk taking prevail given these results qualitative surveys of managers suggest risks to be acceptable if their outcome distribution meets certain criteria we argue in this paper that these criteria are widely congruent with low downside risk using a novel simulation design we analyze the effects of experiential learning and competitive selection on downside risk preferences in an ecology of agents in the long run experiential learning implies weak downside risk seeking whereas competitive selection leads to strong downside risk aversion furthermore competitive selection leads to the prevalence of outcome distributions with low downside risk in an ecology even if they have a significantly higher level of total risk than comparable distributions with more downside risk we draw implications for empirical studies on managerial behavior the online appendix is available at https doi org 10 1287 orsc 2017 1149

estimating risk preferences from deductible choice we develop a structural econometric model to estimate risk preferences from data on deductible choices in auto insurance contracts we account for adverse selection by modeling unobserved heterogeneity in both risk claim rate and risk aversion we find large and skewed heterogeneity in risk attitudes in addition women are more risk averse than men risk aversion exhibits a u shape with respect to age and proxies for income and wealth are positively associated with absolute risk aversion finally unobserved heterogeneity in risk aversion is greater than that of risk and as we illustrate has important implications for insurance pricing

how prudent are consumers using data from the consumer expenditure survey this paper presents a simple test that provides an explicit estimate of the parameter in the utility function that reflects the strength of the precautionary saving motive the coefficient of relative prudence the test yields a fairly precise estimate of a small precautionary motive in fact the estimate is too small to be consistent with widely accepted beliefs about risk aversion the presence of liquidity constrained households does not appear to explain this finding and there is some evidence that self selection of households into risky environments also cannot explain the results

higher order risk attitudes demographics and financial decisions we conduct an experiment to study the prevalence of the higher order risk attitudes of prudence and temperance in a large demographically representative sample as well as in a sample of undergraduate students participants make pairwise choices between lotteries of the form proposed by eeckhoudt and schlesinger 2006 the choices in these lotteries isolate prudent from imprudent and temperate from intemperate behavior we relate individuals risk aversion prudence and temperance levels to demographics and financial decisions we observe that the majority of individuals decisions are consistent with risk aversion prudence and temperance in both the student and the demographically representative sample an individual s level of prudence is predictive of his wealth saving and borrowing behavior outside of the experiment while temperance predicts the riskiness of portfolio choices our findings suggest that the coefficient of relative prudence for a representative individual is approximately equal to two

portfolio selection with consumption ratcheting abstract in this paper we study the portfolio selection problem of a finite lived agent who does not tolerate a decline in standard of living the preference can be regarded as exhibiting extreme form of habit formation and also related to loss aversion in the prospect theory we show that the agent s optimal portfolio exhibits a trend chasing behavior and the portfolio share of the risky asset fluctuates between 0 and the value of an unconstrained individual the fluctuations do not attenuate as time gets near the end of the planning horizon we also explore implications of the model for asset pricing and show that the model has a potential to match better the recent us data than traditional habit models we provide a complete solution to the problem by considering a transformed problem which is similar in its formal structure to an irreversible incremental investment problem and equivalent to an infinite series of optimal stopping problems

exploring the consistency of higher order risk preferences this study measures higher order risk preferences and their consistency we explore the role of country differences the variation of stakes and the framing of lotteries we observe a robust dichotomous pattern of choice behavior in china in the usa and in germany the majority of choices are consistent with mixed risk aversion or mixed risk loving behavior we also find this pattern after a tenfold increase in the stakes finally our results reveal that this pattern is strengthened if the lotteries are displayed in compound rather than reduced form in a follow up study we explore potential explanations for this framing effect

precautionary bidding in auctions we analyze bidding behavior in auctions when risk averse buyers bid for a good whose value is risky we show that when the risk in the valuations increases dara bidders will reduce their bids by more than the appropriate increase in the risk premium ceteris paribus buyers will be better off bidding for a more risky object in first price second price and english auctions with affiliated common interdependent values this precautionary bidding effect arises because the expected marginal utility of income increases with risk so buyers are reluctant to bid so highly we also show that precautionary bidding behavior can make dara bidders prefer bidding in a common values setting to bidding in a private values one when risk neutral or cara bidders would be indifferent thus the potential for a winner s curse can be a blessing for rational dara bidders

precautionary saving in the small and in the large the theory of precautionary saving is shown to be isomorphic to the arrow pratt theory of risk aversion making possible the application of a large body of knowledge about risk aversion to precautionary saving and more generally to the theory of optimal choice under risk in particular a measure of the strength of the precautionary saving motive analogous to the arrow pratt measure of risk aversion is used to establish a number of new propositions about precautionary saving and to give a new interpretation of the dreze modigliani substitution effect copyright 1990 by the econometric society

changes in risk and the demand for saving abstract how does risk affect saving empirical work typically examines the effects of detectible differences in risk within the data how these differences affect saving in theoretical models depends on the metric one uses for risk for labor income risk second degree increases in risk require prudence to induce increased saving demand however prudence is not necessary for first degree risk increases and not sufficient for higher degree risk increases for increases in interest rate risk a precautionary effect and a substitution effect need to be compared this paper provides necessary and sufficient conditions on preferences for an n th degree change in risk to increase saving