the greenhouse effect damages costs and abatement the buildup of so called greenhouse gases in the atmosphere co2 in particular appears to be having an adverse impact on the global climate this paper briefly reviews current expectations with regard to physical and biological effects their potential costs to society and likely costs of abatement for a worst case scenario it is impossible to assess in economic terms the full range of possible non linear synergistic effects in the most favorable although not necessarily likely case of slow paced climate change however it seems likely that the impacts are within the affordable range at least in the industrialized countries of the world in the third world the notion of affordability is of doubtful relevance making the problem of quantitative evaluation almost impossible we tentatively assess the lower limit of quantifiable climate induced damages at 30 to 35 per ton of co2 equivalent worldwide with the major damages being concentrated in regions most adversely affected by sea level rise the non quantifiable environmental damages are also significant and should by no means be disregarded the costs and benefits of 1 reducing cfc use and 2 reducing fossil fuel consumption as a means of abatement are considered in some detail this strategy has remarkably high indirect benefits in terms of reduced air pollution damage and even direct cost savings to consumers the indirect benefits of reduced air pollution and its associated health and environmental effects from fossil fuel combustion in the industrialized countries range from 20 to 60 per ton of co2 eliminated in addition there is good evidence that modest e g 25 reductions in co2 emissions may be achievable by the u s and by implication for other countries by a combination of increased energy efficiency and restructuring that would permit simultaneous direct economic benefits savings to energy consumers of the order of 50 per ton of co2 saved a higher level of overall emissions reduction possibly approaching 50 could probably be achieved at little or not net cost by taking advantage of these savings we suggest the use of taxes on fossil fuel extraction or a carbon tax as a reasonable way of inducing the structural changes that would be required to achieve significant reduction in energy use and co2 emissions to minimize the economic burden and create a political constituency in support of the approach we suggest the substitution of resource based taxes in general for other types of taxes on labor income real estate or trade that are now the main sources of government revenue while it is conceded that it would be difficult to calculate the optimal tax on extractive resources we do not think this is a necessary prerequisite to policy making in fact we note that the existing tax system has never been optimized according to theoretical principles and is far from optimal by any reasonable criteria

how much damage will climate change do recent estimates two reasons to be concerned about climate change are its unjust distributional impact and its negative aggregate effect on economic growth and welfare although our knowledge of the impact of climate change is incomplete and uncertain economic valuation is difficult and controversial and the effect of other developments on the impacts of climate change is largely speculative the authors find that poorer countries and people are more vulnerable than are richer countries and people a modest global warming is likely to have a net negative effect on poor countries in hot climates but may have a net positive effect on rich countries in temperate climates if one counts dollars the world aggregate may be positive if one counts people the world aggregate is probably negative negative impacts would become more negative and positive impacts would turn negative for more substantial warming the marginal costs of carbon dioxide emissions are uncertain and sensitive to assumptions that partially reflect ethical positions but are unlikely to be larger than 50 per tonne carbon

frontiers of climate change economics the economics of climate change is an active field of research the contributions to a special issue are put in context of the literature and it is suggested that second best issues such as carbon leakage and the green paradox need to be complemented with a political economy analysis of why certain instruments are politically infeasible and with intra and intergenerational analyses of the impact of climate policy a case is also made for more empirical work on the gradual and catastrophic damages of global warming

are optimal emissions really optimal four critical issues for economists in the greenhouse although the greenhouse effect is by many considered as one of the most serious environmental problems several economic studies of the greenhouse effect most notably nordhaus s dice model suggest that it is optimal to allow the emissions of greenhouse gases ghg to increase by a factor of three over the next century other studies have found that substantial reductions can be justified on economic grounds this paper explores into the reasons for these differences and identifies four partly overlapping crucial issues that have to be dealt with when analysing the economics of the greenhouse effect low probability but catastrophic events cost evaluation methods the choice of discount rate the choice of decision criterion the paper shows that i these aspects are crucial for the policy conclusions drawn from models of the economics of climate change and that ii ethical choices have to be made for each of these issues this fact needs wider recognition since economics is very often perceived as a value neutral tool that can be used to provide policy makers with optimal policies

welfare specifications and optimal control of climate change an application of fund the sensitivity of the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions to the specification of the social welfare function is systematically explored using the fund model increasing risk aversion emphasises climate change damages relative to emission reduction costs but at the same time increases the discount rate of consumption without international co operation the discount rate effect dominates so that optimal control decreases with increasing risk aversion with international co operation optimal control first increases then decreases with increasing risk aversion since climate change falls heaviest on the poor optimal control increases with increasing inequity aversion full fledged intergenerational welfare functions on the one hand emphasise climate change damages but on the other hand place more weight on current poorer generations in fund the two tendencies almost cancel

efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs we evaluate by means of mathematical programming formulations the relative technical and scale efficiencies of decision making units dmus when some of the inputs or outputs are exogenously fixed and beyond the discretionary control of dmu managers this approach further develops the work on efficiency evaluation and on estimation of efficient production frontiers known as data envelopment analysis dea we also employ the model to provide efficient input and output targets for dmu managers in a way that specifically accounts for the fixed nature of some of the inputs or outputs we illustrate the approach using real data for a network of fast food restaurants

some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis in management contexts mathematical programming is usually used to evaluate a collection of possible alternative courses of action en route to selecting one which is best in this capacity mathematical programming serves as a planning aid to management data envelopment analysis reverses this role and employs mathematical programming to obtain ex post facto evaluations of the relative efficiency of management accomplishments however they may have been planned or executed mathematical programming is thereby extended for use as a tool for control and evaluation of past accomplishments as well as a tool to aid in planning future activities the ccr ratio form introduced by charnes cooper and rhodes as part of their data envelopment analysis approach comprehends both technical and scale inefficiencies via the optimal value of the ratio form as obtained directly from the data without requiring a priori specification of weights and or explicit delineation of assumed functional forms of relations between inputs and outputs a separation into technical and scale efficiencies is accomplished by the methods developed in this paper without altering the latter conditions for use of dea directly on observational data technical inefficiencies are identified with failures to achieve best possible output levels and or usage of excessive amounts of inputs methods for identifying and correcting the magnitudes of these inefficiencies as supplied in prior work are illustrated in the present paper a new separate variable is introduced which makes it possible to determine whether operations were conducted in regions of increasing constant or decreasing returns to scale in multiple input and multiple output situations the results are discussed and related not only to classical single output economics but also to more modern versions of economics which are identified with contestable market theories

valuing the impact of co2 emissions valuing the impacts of co2 emissions to the atmosphere has been widely debated with various studies suggesting very different costs when expressed in units of dollar per tonne of carbon emitted there are many complex issues involved and it is often difficult to determine the reasons for the wide range of costs proposed in this paper models based on two very different approaches the page and intera models are considered by applying these models to calculating the marginal impact of co2 emissions it is shown that what appear initially to be divergent estimates can be reconciled this process illustrates some of the key issues in this area and a perspective is provided on which marginal costs are appropriate for different policy decisions

taxing fossil fuels under speculative storage long term environmental consequences of taxing fossil fuel usage have been extensively studied in the literature however these taxes may also impose several short run macroeconomic policy challenges the nature of which remains underexplored this paper investigates the mechanisms through which environmental taxes on fossil fuel usage can affect the main macroeconomic variables in the short run we concentrate on a particular mechanism speculative storage formulating and using a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium dsge model calibrated for the united states with an explicit storage facility and nominal rigidities we show that in designing environmental tax policies it is crucial to account for the fact that fossil fuel prices are subject to speculation the existence of forward looking speculators in the model improves the effectiveness of tax policies in reducing fossil fuel usage improved policy effectiveness however is costly it drives inflation and interest rates up while impeding output based on this tradeoff we seek an answer to the question how monetary policy should interact with environmental tax policies in our dsge model of fossil fuel storage we show that in an environment with no speculative storers monetary policy should respond to output along with cpi inflation in order to minimize the welfare losses brought by taxes however when the storage facility is activated responding to output in the monetary policy rule becomes less desirable

the damage costs of climate change a note on tangibles and intangibles applied to dice economic cost benefit analysis of the costs of greenhouse gas emission abatement and climate change often points towards limited abatement this note elucidates one reason why this result is obtained the way in which the intangible damages are treated and the utility function is specified on the basis of the dice model it is shown that by putting the intangible damages directly into the utility function and by assuming them to grow with per capita income the optimal reduction increases and in the second case more than triples compared to nordhaus s original results

economy wide estimates of the implications of climate change sea level rise the economy wide implications of sea level rise in 2050 are estimated using a static computable general equilibrium model this allows for a better estimate of the welfare effects of sea level rise than the common direct cost estimates and for an estimate of the impact of sea level rise on greenhouse gas emissions overall general equilibrium effects increase the welfare costs of sea level rise but not necessarily in every sector or region in the absence of coastal protection economies that rely most on agriculture are hit hardest although energy is substituted for land overall energy consumption falls with the shrinking economy hurting energy exporters with full coastal protection gdp increases particularly in regions with substantial dike building but utility falls least in regions that protect their coasts and export energy energy prices rise and energy consumption falls the costs of full protection exceed the costs of losing land the results also show direct costs the usual method for estimating welfare changes due to sea level rise are a bad approximation of the general equilibrium welfare effects previous estimates of the economic impact of sea level rise are therefore biased

climate change and optimal energy technology r d policy public policy response to global climate change presents a classic problem of decision making under uncertainty theoretical work has shown that explicitly accounting for uncertainty and learning in climate change can have a large impact on optimal policy especially technology policy however theory also shows that the specific impacts of uncertainty are ambiguous in this paper we provide a framework that combines economics and decision analysis to implement probabilistic data on energy technology research and development r d policy in response to global climate change we find that given a budget constraint the composition of the optimal r d portfolio is highly diversified and robust to risk in climate damages the overall optimal investment into technical change however does depend in a non monotonic way on the risk in climate damages finally we show that in order to properly value r d abatement must be included as a recourse decision

policy analysis of the greenhouse effect an application of the page model abstract in this paper we introduce a comprehensive model for policy analysis of the greenhouse effect page we apply the page model to assess the merits of policies to prevent global warming by controlling the emissions of greenhouse gases and policies to adapt to any global warming that occurs the results confirm that it is difficult to overcome the problem of global warming by taking preventive action alone the argument for introducing an aggressive adaptive policy is very strong we calculate the valuation that would have to be placed upon non economic environmental and social impacts for a combined strategy of preventive and adaptive policies to be considered a worthwhile option both for individual regions and for the world as a whole we also show that uncertainties in all four groups of inputs to the model scientific costs of control costs of adaptation and valuation of impacts have a great influence on the costs and impacts of the combined strategy

a general equilibrium analysis of climate change impacts on tourism this paper studies the economic implications of climate change induced variations in tourism demand using a world cge model the model is first re calibrated at some future years obtaining hypothetical benchmark equilibria which are subsequently perturbed by shocks simulating the effects of climate change we portray the impact of climate change on tourism by means of two sets of shocks occurring simultaneously the first set of shocks translate predicted variations in tourist flows into changes of consumption preferences for domestically produced goods the second set reallocate income across world regions simulating the effect of higher or lower tourists expenditure our analysis highlights that variations in tourist flows will affect regional economies in a way that is directly related to the sign and magnitude of flow variations at a global scale climate change will ultimately lead to a welfare loss unevenly spread across regions 2005 elsevier ltd all rights reserved

do current assessments underestimate future damages from climate change while the economic debate on climate policy focuses on discounting we do not know yet what to discount the potential non discounted socio economic cost of climate change indeed is still unknown only a few studies have tried to estimate socio economic costs of climate change most of them concluded that for a warming of a few degrees damages will be limited to a few percent of gdp all these studies however have disregarded important mechanisms and have only considered the cost of a stabilized new climate this article claims that the climate change issue should instead be framed in terms of the adaptation of socio economic systems to a changing climate doing so it calls for the taking into account of 1 the interaction between the uncertainty on future climate and the inertia of important economic sectors 2 the short term economic constraints that will be key in the response to climate shocks finally the impacts of climate change cannot be estimated assuming that societies will always be able to manage in a perfect way the subsequent change in risks as past experiences demonstrate our poor ability to do so these mechanisms suggest that the uncertainty on future climate change damages is even larger than is usually acknowledged and calls for additional research on climate change impacts

rethinking the costs related to global warming a survey of the issues one approach to the economic analysis of global warming seeks to balance the costs of damage from or adaptation to it with the costs of mitigating it the costs of adaptation and damage have been estimated using techniques of environmental evaluation but are subject to a wide margin of uncertainty the costs of mitigation principally by reducing the emissions of co2 have been estimated using different kinds of economic models some of the results of which have suggested that very little abatement of carbon emissions is justified before the costs of abatement exceed the benefits of it in terms of foregone damage and adaptation costs the paper analyses the extent to which this conclusion is a function of the modelling assumptions and techniques used rather than likely practical outcomes with regard to the models treatment of unemployed resources revenue recycling prior distortions in the economy due to the tax system and possible dynamic effects from the introduction of a carbon energy tax it concludes that with different and arguably more appropriate treatment of the above issues especially when the secondary benefits of reducing co2 emissions are also taken into account it is not clear that even substantial reductions in the use of fossil fuels will incur net costs especially if there is the prospect of even moderate costs from global warming

discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming the economics of global warming is reviewed with special emphasis on how the cost depends on the discount rate and on how costs in poor and rich regions are aggregated into a global cost estimate both of these factors depend on the assumptions made concerning the underlying utility and welfare functions it is common to aggregate welfare gains and losses across generations and countries as if the utility of money were constant but it is not if we assume that a e co2 equivalent dlubling implies costs equal to 1 5 of the income in both high and low income countries a pure rate of time preference equal to zero and a utility function which is logarithmic in income then the marginal cost of co2 emissions is estimated at 260 590 usd ton c for a time horizon in the range 300 1000 years an estimate which is large enough to justify significant reductions of co2 emissions on purely economic grounds the estimate is approximately 50 100 times larger than the estimate made by nordhaus in his dice model and the difference is almost completely due to the choice of discount rate and the weight given to the costs in the developing world as well as a more accurate model of the carbon cycle finally the sensitivity of the marginal cost estimate with respect to several parameters is analyzed

monetary valuation of the social cost of co2 emissions a critical survey an expanding branch of research has estimated the potential costs of climate change which are often expressed as the social cost of carbon scc or the costs of an additional ton of co2 emissions estimates of the scc can be used by policy makers to evaluate climate change policies and greenhouse gas emission reduction projects by means of cost benefit analyses cbas such analyses are complicated by the wide range of scc values that have been reported in the literature and the large uncertainties involved in estimating the potential economic impacts and related costs of climate change this study presents a critical review of the reported scc estimates by examining some neglected consequences of climate change uncertain and extreme scenarios of climate change the discounting of future climate change effects the treatment of individual risk aversion and assumptions about social welfare in view of the many uncertainties and omissions in conventional cost benefit analyses of climate impacts and the scc alternative approaches to decision making should be considered for climate policy

the social cost of carbon and its policy implications the shadow price or social cost of carbon is an important indicator of the global incremental damage done by emitting greenhouse gases today cost benefit analysis would set the optimal amount of greenhouse gas emission reduction at the point where this social cost just equals the incremental cost of controlling emissions the higher the value for the social cost of carbon the more control is warranted this comparison assumes that cost benefit analysis is the correct way of determining climate change policy and many believe this is not the case because of the very long term irreversible and potentially catastrophic nature of global warming but in the short run at least a comparison of cost and benefits is required and in any event all decisions imply costs and benefits but what is the right figure for the social cost of carbon this paper reviews the uk government s assessment of the cost and concludes that it has been set far too high because of a misreading of the integrated assessment models used to balance costs and benefits moreover adoption of the uk government s shadow price would have formidable implications for energy policy in the uk and for policies on afforestation copyright 2003 oxford university press

climate change costs recent advancements in the economic assessment climate change is unique among the consequences of fossil fuel burning in its far reaching impact both spatially and temporally earlier studies estimate the aggregated monetized damage due to climate change at 1 5 to 2 0 of world gdp for 2 co2 the oecd would lose 1 0 to 1 5 of gdp the developing countries 2 0 to 9 0 according to these estimates these figures are not comprehensive and highly uncertain newer studies increasingly emphasize adaptation variability extreme events other non climate change stress factors and the need for integrated assessment of damages as a result differences in impacts between regions and sectors have increased the market impacts in developed countries tended to fall and non market impacts have become increasingly important marginal damages are more interesting from a policy point of view earlier estimates range from about us 5 to us 125 per tonne of carbon with most estimates at the lower end of this range these figures are based on polynomial functions in the level of climate change but the rate of change may be equally important as are the speed of adaptation restoration and value adjustment furthermore future vulnerability to climate change will be different from current vulnerability on the whole the market impacts fall relatively with economic growth while the non market impacts rise relatively with growth

equitable cost benefit analysis of climate change greenhouse gas emissions and vulnerability to climate change show a strong negative correlation this is the moral issue at the heart of the climate problem however little attention has been paid to this in the literature see banuri et al 1996 for an overview the literature on equity issues in climate change is largely confined to the distribution of emissions reduction targets this literature takes the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions for granted and takes a parametric approach to the required reductions on the other hand the literature that tries to derive how much emissions abatement is desirable largely ducks the equity issue this paper is an attempt to combine the two problems

estimates of the economic effects of sea level rise regional estimates of direct cost dc are commonly used to measure the economic damages of sea level rise such estimates suffer from three limitations i values of threatened endowments are not well known ii loss of endowments does not affect consumer prices and iii international trade is disregarded results in this paper indicate that these limitations can significantly affect economic assessments of sea level rise current uncertainty regarding endowment values as reflected in two alternative data sets for example leads to a 17 percent difference in coastal protec tion a 36 percent difference in the amount of land protected and a 36 percent difference in dc globally also global losses in equivalent variation ev a welfare measure that accounts for price changes are 13 percent higher than dc estimates regional ev losses may be up to 10 percent lower than regional dc however because international trade tends to redistribute losses from regions with relatively high damages to regions with relatively low damages

a social cost of carbon for almost every country this paper uses imputed national climate change impact functions to estimate national social costs of carbon which are largest in poor countries with large populations the national social costs of carbon of faster growing economies are less sensitive to the pure rate of time preference and more sensitive to the rate of risk aversion the pattern of national social costs of carbon is not sensitive to the assumed impact function climate sensitivity and scenario although the global social cost of carbon is income convergence raises the national social costs of carbon of poorer countries and lowers them for richer countries both global and national social costs of carbon are most sensitive to the income elasticity of climate change impacts a parameter about which we know little

equitable cost benefit analysis of climate change policies the literature of welfare maximising greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies pays remarkably little attention to equity this paper introduces three ways to consider efficiency and equity simultaneously the first method inspired by kant and rawls maximises net present welfare without international cooperation as if all regions share the fate of the region affected worst by climate change optimal emission abatement varies greatly depending on the spatial and temporal resolution that is the grid at which maximum impact is defined the second method is inspired by varian s no envy emissions are reduced so as to equalise total costs and benefits of climate change over all countries of the world and over all time periods emission reductions are substantial this method approximately preserves the inequities that would occur in a world without climate change the third method uses non linear aggregations of welfare the utilitarian default is linear in a cooperative setting this method cannot distinguish between sources of inequity the higher the aversion to inequity the higher optimal greenhouse gas emission reduction

designing climate mitigation policy this us paper provides an exhaustive review of critical issues in the design of climate mitigation policy by pulling together key findings and controversies from diverse literatures on mitigation costs damage valuation policy instrument choice technological innovation and international climate policy the authors begin with the broadest issue of how high assessments suggest the near and medium term price on greenhouse gases would need to be both under cost effective stabilization of global climate and under net benefit maximization or pigouvian emissions pricing the remainder of the paper focuses on the appropriate scope of regulation issues in policy instrument choice complementary technology policy and international policy architectures

the double edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions this study aims to bring together seemingly contradicting arguments in the literature about the role of cultural distance in international acquisitions we offer a model that postulates that cultural distance relates negatively to international acquisition performance because it taxes integration capabilities during international acquisitions but that cultural distance also elevates the positive association of integration capabilities and international acquisition performance because it provides more learning opportunities that can only be exploited with strong integration capabilities empirical tests with a sample of international acquisitions by 118 us multinational companies provide support for the proposed model on one hand we find that cultural distance impedes understandability of key capabilities that need to be transferred and constrains communication between acquirers and their acquired units bringing about a negative indirect effect on acquisition performance on the other hand we find that cultural distance enriches acquisitions by enhancing the positive effects of understandability and communication on acquisition performance acquirers that can overcome the impeding effects of cultural distance on understanding key capabilities and effective communication appear to reap significant performance gains our study provides initial support for a double edged sword effect of cultural differences on acquisition performance and illustrates the importance of integration capabilities

carbon markets and technological innovation this paper examines the effects of firm level innovation in carbon abatement technologies on optimal cap and trade schemes with and without price controls we characterize optimal cap and trade regulation with a price cap and a price floor and compare it to the special cases of pure taxation and a simple emissions cap innovation shifts the tradeoff between price and quantity based instruments towards quantitybased emissions trading schemes more specifically an increase in innovation effectiveness lowers the optimal emissions cap and leads to relaxed price controls unless the slope of the marginal environmental damage curve is small because of the decrease in the emissions cap innovation in abatement technologies can lead to a higher expected carbon price so as to provide sufficient incentives for private r d investments the expected carbon price decreases once innovative technologies are widely used

managing the learning and transfer of global management competence antecedents and outcomes of japanese repatriation effectiveness this study examines predictors that lead to effective individual learning of global management competencies on expatriate assignments and the transfer i e the application of those competencies in new assignments upon repatriation a structural equation model based on data from 305 japanese repatriates identifies linkages from organizational support intercultural personality characteristics self adjustment and repatriation policies to outcomes of global competency learning and transfer which in turn lead to heightened job motivation and performance

the effects of ageing and an environmental trust fund in an overlapping generations model on carbon emission reductions most currently employed integrated assessment models for climate change are of a dynastic nature they employ the ramsey rule linking the interest rate economic growth and the rate of pure time preference this paper argues that although a dynastic framework might be convenient for economic analysis it is restrictive and can be misleading overlapping generations models which do not employ the ramsey rule are more flexible and may give results different from those derived from dynastic models with the integrated assessment model alice 2 0 it is shown how various assumptions on demographic change and public institutions can affect the interest rate thereby influencing the efficient greenhouse gas emission reductions it is concluded that dynastic integrated assessment models are in many respects inappropriate for providing policy makers with quantitative figures about the costs of carbon dioxide emissions and their desirable reduction levels 2001 elsevier science b v all rights reserved

overlapping generations or infinitely lived agents intergenerational altruism and the economics of global warming do we need an overlapping generations model for the economics of global warming to answer this question an infinitely lived agent ila approach and an overlapping generations olg model are contrasted ila and olg can be viewed as polar representations of intergenerational altruism with ila an immortal agent acts through his investment savings decisions as trustee on the behalf of the future generations with olg agents need not behave altruistic they simply save during working years and dissave completely during retirement nevertheless ila and olg must not differ in their implication for greenhouse policy greenhouse gas abatement is a straightforward alternative to physical capital formation and even without altruism each age cohort has an incentive to provide current abatement in order to reduce future damages attributable to climate change indeed under reasonable assumptions and parameter values our simulations reveal such an invariance result provided carbon taxes are the only policy tool and tax revenues are recycled through socially mandated rules projections of economic growth climate change and energy consumption are only insignificantly affected by the choice of approach

data envelopment analysis with resource constraints an alternative model with non discretionary factors abstract it is shown that supplying additional resources in order to achieve full efficiency is equivalent to expansion of the input output space with additional factors that are non discretionary resource intensive and resource extensive efficiencies are introduced and defined a numerical example is given

cooperation on climate change mitigation abstract we analyze conditions under which it is possible to achieve efficient mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions with a self enforcing international agreement in which all countries find it in their self interest to abide by the agreement we model the choice of emissions by countries as a dynamic game we use a two part punishment scheme for deviations from an agreement that is renegotiation proof and show when this scheme supports the efficient outcome as a subgame perfect equilibrium using numerical examples we show that an efficient subgame perfect equilibrium exists for a range of reasonable parameter values the existence of such equilibrium may be non monotonic in the discount rate and the ratio of slope of marginal abatement cost and marginal damages

on international equity weights and national decision making on climate change abstract estimates of the marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions require the aggregation of monetised impacts of climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions implicitly or explicitly such estimates assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice we show that previous approaches to equity weighting are inappropriate from a national decision maker s point of view because domestic impacts are not valued at domestic values we propose four alternatives sovereignty altruism good neighbour and compensation with different views on concern for and liability towards foreigners the four alternatives imply radically different estimates of the social cost of carbon and hence the optimal intensity of climate policy

optimal dynamic carbon taxes in a climate economy model with distortionary fiscal policy how should carbon be taxed as a part of fiscal policy the literature on optimal carbon pricing often abstracts from other taxes however when governments raise revenues with distortionary taxes carbon levies have fiscal impacts while they raise revenues directly they may shrink the bases of other taxes e g by decreasing employment this article theoretically characterizes and then quantifies optimal carbon taxes in a dynamic general equilibrium climate economy model with distortionary fiscal policy first this article establishes a novel theoretical relationship between the optimal taxation of carbon and of capital income this link arises because carbon emissions destroy natural capital they accumulate in the atmosphere and decrease future output consequently this article shows how the standard logic against capital income taxes extends to distortions on environmental capital investments second this article characterizes optimal climate policy in sub optimal fiscal settings where income taxes are constrained to remain at their observed levels third this article presents a detailed calibration that builds on the seminal dice approach but adds features essential for a setting with distortionary taxes such as a differentiation between climate change production impacts e g on agriculture and direct utility impacts e g on biodiversity existence value the central quantitative finding is that optimal carbon tax schedules are 8 24 lower when there are distortionary taxes compared to the setting with lump sum taxes considered in the literature

external costs of energy do the answers match the questions looking back at 10 years of externe abstract while the claim for getting prices right is quite popular in conceptual policy papers the implementation of appropriate internalisation strategies is still hampered by a lack of reliable external cost data great expectations were set into the externe project a major research programme launched by the european commission at the beginning of the 1990s to provide a scientific basis for the quantification of energy related externalities and to give guidance supporting the design of internalisation measures after more than a decade of research the externe label became a well recognised standard source for external cost data looking back into the externe history the paper pursues how emerging new scientific insights and changing background assumptions affected external cost estimates and related recommendations to policy over time based on externe results the usefulness and inherent limitations of external cost estimates for impact categories like climate change or nuclear waste disposal is discussed the paper also gives examples on how external costs in spite of remaining uncertainties are successfully used to support environmental policy

taxes and quotas for a stock pollutant with multiplicative uncertainty we compare taxes and quotas when firms and the regulator have asymmetric information about the slope of firms abatement costs damages are caused by a stock pollutant we calibrate the model using cost and damage estimates of greenhouse gasses taxes dominate quotas as with additive uncertainty this model with multiplicative uncertainty allows us to compare expected stock levels under the two policies and to investigate the importance of stock size and the magnitude of uncertainty on the policy ranking

unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams a meta analysis of research on multicultural work groups previous research on the role of cultural diversity in teams is equivocal suggesting that cultural diversity s effect on teams is mediated by specific team processes and moderated by contextual variables to reconcile conflicting perspectives and past results we propose that cultural diversity affects teams through process losses and gains associated with increased divergence and decreased convergence we examine whether the level surface level vs deep level and type cross national vs intra national of cultural diversity affect these processes differently we hypothesize that task complexity and structural aspects of the team such as team size team tenure and team dispersion moderate the effects of cultural diversity on teams we test the hypotheses with a meta analysis of 108 empirical studies on processes and performance in 10 632 teams results suggest that cultural diversity leads to process losses through task conflict and decreased social integration but to process gains through increased creativity and satisfaction the effects are almost identical for both levels and types of cultural diversity moderator analyses reveal that the effects of cultural diversity vary depending on contextual influences as well as on research design and sample characteristics we propose an agenda for future research and identify implications for managers

the economic effects of climate change greenhouse gas emissions are fundamental both to the world s energy system and to its food production the production of co2 the predominant gas implicated in climate change is intrinsic to fossil fuel combustion specifically thermal energy is generated by breaking the chemical bonds in the carbohydrates oil coal and natural gas and oxidizing the components to co2 and h2o one cannot have cheap energy without carbon dioxide emissions similarly methane ch4 emissions an important greenhouse gas in its own right are necessary to prevent the build up of hydrogen in anaerobic digestion and decomposition one cannot have beef mutton dairy or rice without methane emissions climate change is the mother of all externalities larger more complex and more uncertain than any other environmental problem the sources of greenhouse gas emissions are more diffuse than any other environmental problem every company every farm every household emits some greenhouse gases the effects are similarly pervasive weather affects agriculture energy use health and many aspects of nature which in turn affects everything and everyone the causes and consequences of climate change are very diverse and those in low income countries who contribute least to climate change are most vulnerable to its effects climate change is also a long term problem some greenhouse gases have an atmospheric life time measured in tens of thousands of years the quantities of emissions involved are enormous in 2000 carbon dioxide emissions alone and excluding land use change were 24 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide tco2

weight factors in cost benefit analysis of climate change equity considerations may justify the use of weight factors when estimating the costs of climate change this paper reviews different weight factors that have been used in the climate economics literature based on a simple model it is shown that although the different weight factors imply substantially different cost damage estimates they actually yield the same optimal emission reductions this paradox is explained by the fact that some of the approaches require that also the abatement costs are weighted and this offsets the effect of the diverging cost damage estimates the model is then used to analyse the importance weighting may have on the overall cost benefit analysis at present when most of the global emissions of fossil co2 originate from the industrialised countries the global optimal emissions are considerably lower if costs are weighted however the more the emissions in developing countries grow the less important becomes the introduction of weight factors in cost benefit analysis of climate change for the global emission reductions in the model developed here on a regional level the introduction of weight factors continues to play an important role implying substantially lower emissions in the rich region and slightly higher in the poor

targets for global climate policy an overview a survey of the economic impact of climate change and the marginal damage costs shows that carbon dioxide emissions are a negative externality the estimated pigou tax and its growth rate are too low to justify the climate policy targets set by political leaders a lower discount rate or greater concern for the global distribution of income would justify more stringent climate policy but would imply an overhaul of other public policies catastrophic risk justifies more stringent climate policy but only to a limited extent

climate change and insurance a critical appraisal several issues relating to insurance and the damage costs of climate change are discussed it is argued that the option of insuring climate change is severely limited because the associated damages are hardly quantifiable and little diversifiable in addition binding contracts are a problem on long time scales and in an international context hedging consumption smoothing over time precautionary investments and liability are not to be presented under the heading of insurance not only because this unnecessarily and confusingly expands the traditional definition of insurance but also because this could create a false sense of security the impact of climate change on the profitability of the commercial insurance sector is not likely to be severe as the insurance companies are capable of shifting changed risks to the insured provided that they are properly and timely informed on the consequences of climate change

the impact of climate change on the balanced growth equivalent an application of fund the stern review added balanced growth equivalents bge to the economic climate change research agenda we first propose rigorous definitions of the bge for multiple regions and under uncertainty we show that the change in the bge is independent of the assumed scenario of per capita income for comparable welfare economic assumptions as the stern review we calculate lower changes in bge between a business as usual scenario and one without climate impacts with the model fund than the stern review found with the model page we find that mitigation policies give even lower changes in bge and argue that those policy choices should be the focus of the research effort rather than total damage estimates according to our results the current carbon tax should be below 55 tc sensitivity analyses show that the stern review chose parameters that imply high impact estimates however for regionally disaggregated welfare functions we find changes in bge that are significantly higher than the results from the stern review both for total damage as for policy analysis with regional disaggregation and high risk aversion we observe fat tails and with that very high welfare losses

the damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations it is argued that estimating the damage costs of a certain benchmark climate change is not sufficient what is needed are cost functions and confidence intervals although these are contained in the integrated models and their technical manuals this paper brings them into the open in order to stimulate discussion after briefly reviewing the benchmark climate change damage costs region specific cost functions are presented which distinguish tangible from intangible losses and the losses due to a changing climate from those due to a changed climate furthermore cost functions are assumed to be quadratic as an approximation of the unknown but presumably convex functions results from the damage module of the integrated climate economy model fund are presented next uncertainties are incorporated and expected damages are calculated it is shown that because of convex loss functions and right skewed uncertain ties the risk premium is substantial calling for more action than analysis based on best guess estimates the final section explores some needs for further scientific research

what we talk about when we talk about global mindset managerial cognition in multinational corporations recent developments in the global economy and in multinational corporations have placed significant emphasis on the cognitive orientations of managers giving rise to a number of concepts such as global mindset that are presumed to be associated with the effective management of multinational corporations this paper reviews the literature on global mindset and clarifies some of the conceptual confusion surrounding the construct we identify common themes across writers suggesting that the majority of studies fall into one of three research perspectives cultural strategic and multidimensional we also identify two constructs from the social sciences cosmopolitanism and cognitive complexity that underlie the perspectives found in the literature we then use these two constructs to develop an integrative theoretical framework of global mindset we then provide a critical assessment of the field of global mindset and suggest directions for future theoretical and empirical research

the damage costs of climate change towards a dynamic representation economic assessments of climate change impacts are commonly presented as the effect of a climate change associated with a doubling of the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide on the current economy this paper is an attempt to express impact as a function of both climate change and socio economic change with regard to climate change issues discussed are level versus rate of change speed of adaptation speed of restoration and value adjustment and symmetry with regard to socio economic change agriculture migration and the valuation of intangible losses are addressed uncertainty and higher order impacts are treated briefly it is qualitatively argued and quantitatively illustrated that these issues matter a great deal for the damage profile over the next century a damage model based on my best guesses is presented in the appendix