applied econometrics rankings 1989 1995 this paper ranks academic institutions by publication activity in applied econometrics over the period 1989 1995 fourteen leading international journals that publish applied econometrics articles are used to provide the database the rankings are based on standardized page counts of articles published in these journals over the stated period a hall of fame is developed listing the top 100 individual producers of applied econometrics in the fourteen journals considered to control for quality differences among the applied journals separate rankings are provided both for institutions and for individuals according to econometrics publications by journal

patterns of co authorship among economics departments in the usa given the steady increase in co authored papers in economics journals this paper reports a study of the patterns of co authorship between us universities and colleges a majority of institutions produce more co authored than single authored papers contacts with researchers from the same institution are still an important source of co authored papers even though slightly decreasing in frequency the determinants of co authorship outside the own institution are tested in a gravity model and it is found that distance and other geographical variables do not matter however the quality of co authors institutions measured by rankings of institutions has a significant impact on the number of co authored papers in top economics journals

rankings methodology for international comparisons of institutions and individuals an application to economics in australia and new zealand abstract the objectives of this paper are threefold first we critically survey and analyse the different methodologies that have been adopted in the rankings literature second using journal articles included in the econlit database and on the basis of two criteria one based on citations and the other on perceptions of journal quality we rank economics teaching departments in australia and new zealand for 1988 2002 and 1996 2002 and for individual academic economists for the periods 1988 2002 1988 1995 and 1996 2002 furthermore we identify individual star performers and recognize them in a designated hall of fame for 1988 2002 third our methodology enables us to make international comparisons on total and per capita bases previous multi country ranking studies in economics do not rank economics departments they provide rankings based on total publications in economics in universities regardless of whether the economists are in the economics departments or in other departments thus no rankings on per capita bases are provided we correct this shortcoming by providing total and per capita rankings and analysing the correlations between total and per capita rankings this is the first study to examine whether the size of the economics department matters with regard to productivity

where are the economists who publish publication concentration and rankings in europe based on cumulative publications we measure the past production of research articles by current members of european economics institutions all econlit journals are used weighted to reflect differences in quality both a long 1971 2000 and a short 1996 2000 time period are considered we also provide production indices that take into account the authors career length the total output of each research center is measured as well as its production per member the focus is on 600 centers from eighteen european countries eu 14 israel norway switzerland and turkey european centers are compared to the top sixty u s economics departments statistics regarding the concentration of article production across researchers institutions and countries are provided as well as on publication habits jel a14 l11 r32

a revisionist perspective of european research in economics abstract the study by kalaitzidakis et al eur econom rev 113 1999a 1150 1168 hereafter kms continues to exert significant influence on the literature that evaluates the relative publication performance of european centres of research in economics the current paper argues that the methodology employed by kms is deficient and that it is not the methodology these authors intended to employ i utilise an improved approach to revise the original rankings that relied on publication output from 1991 to 1996 and to update the relevant findings using 1997 2002 data the revised rankings differ greatly from those reported by kms the results also suggest that there have been dramatic shifts in the relative ranking of the various european institutions over time as expected rankings are sensitive to the choice of journals considered however ranking sensitivity is considerably more pronounced with respect to changes in individual performance over time than to the group of journals used to measure performance

two to tango gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor i introduction there is a well developed mythology regarding the presence of old boy networks and their importance in explaining gender differences in labor market outcomes as articulated by saloner 1985 nonetheless aside from works such as simon and warner 1992 there is relatively little empirical evidence examining the impact of networks on market outcomes how these effects differ by gender and whether gender differences in network access change over time as women become more well represented in a profession the paucity of empirical evidence arises in part from the difficulty of measuring the presence of such networks prior work including that of saint paul 2001 and erickson and jacoby 2003 has found evidence that networks facilitate the adoption of team oriented work practices and information sharing that increase average worker productivity in management and professional jobs on the other hand studies such as that by marmaros and sacerdote 2002 have also found that women have less access to networks than their male counterparts in both private and public sector jobs which has been shown to yield gender differences in job placement and other labor market outcomes this article considers how gender differences in networks are manifested in a specific male dominated profession i e academic economists and in a specific work related outcome i e the decision to coauthor articles in which access to networks is likely to be important the analysis uses uniquely detailed individual and job level data for phd economists included in nearly four decades of american economic association aea membership to examine the role of networks on the joint decision to publish and coauthor the unique matching process of phd economists between academic and nonacademic jobs and within the hierarchy of academic departments along with the relative ease of observing joint research provide a rare opportunity to distinguish differential network access and measure joint production the results demonstrate the importance of networks in the production of research output and that new female entrants into a male dominated profession do not have equal access to these professional networks the results also provide evidence that women are able to plug into networks over time as the profession becomes more gender representative our study contributes to the literature on the role of networks in the labor market in several ways first the profession of academic economist is well suited to this study because it is made up of workers who produce a relatively homogenous output i e scholarly journal articles and that share a common set of job related tasks i e teaching research and service second the incidence of coauthorship is an observable outcome measure of network utilization a phenomenon inherently difficult to measure in the tradition of the business productivity literature as found in sabel 1993 third there is extensive evidence in the literature that journal publications are positively linked to academic salaries as found in siegfried and white 1973 and sauer 1988 that the propensity to coauthor is positively associated with publication output as in as found in durden and perri 1995 and maske et al 2003 that there are gender differences in tendencies to coauthor as shown by ferber and teiman 1980 and mcdowell and smith 1992 and that there are gender differences in professional outcomes such as publications salary and promotion as seen in mcdowell 1982 hansen et al 1978 formby et al 1993 and broder 1993 cumulatively these studies suggest that understanding the determinants of coauthorship is important for evaluating the sources and the extent of gender inequity in the profession prior work on coauthorship behavior has analyzed patterns over time and across disciplines several studies including hudson 1996 mcdowell and melvin 1983 and barnett et al

the economic theory of agrarian institutions introduction alternative approaches to the theory of institutions in economic development pranab bardhan rational peasants efficient institutions and a theory of rural organization methodological remarks for development economics joseph e stiglitz part 1 land and labour theories of sharecropping nirvikar singh a comparison of principal agent and bargaining solutions the case of tenancy contracts clive bell contracts with eviction in infinitely repeated principal agent relationships bhaskar dutta et al production relations in semi arid african agriculture hans binswanger et al part 2 credit and interlinked transactions rural credit markets the structure of interest rates exploitation and efficiency kaushik basu credit and agrarian class structure mukesh eswaran and ashok kotwal credit rationing tenancy productivity and the dynamics of inequality avishay braverman and joseph e stiglitz on choice among creditors and bonded labour contracts t n srinivasan some aspects of linked product and credit market contracts among risk neutral agents clive bell and t n srinivasan a note on interlinked rural economic arrangements pranab bardhan interlinkages and the pattern of competition debraj ray and kunal sengupta part 3 marketing and insurance agricultural institutions for insurance and stabilization david m newbery peasants risk aversion and the choice of marketing intermediaries and contracts a bargaining theory of equilibrium marketing contracts pinhas zusman part 4 co operatives technology and the state agricultural producer co operatives louis putterman institutional analysis of credit co operatives avishay braverman and j luis guasch agrarian structure technological innovations and the state alain de janvry et al

agricultural household models extensions applications and policy this book presents the basic model of an agricultural household that underlies most of the case studies undertaken so far the model assumes that households are price takers and is therefore recursive the decisions modeled include those affecting production and the demand for inputs and those affecting consumption and the supply of labor comparative results on selected elasticities are presented for a number of economies the empirical significance of the approach is demonstrated in a comparison of models that treat production and consumption decisions separately and those in which the decisionmaking process is recursive the book summarizes the implications of agricultural pricing policy for the welfare of farm households marketed surplus the demand for nonagricultural goods and services the rural labor market budget revenues and foreign exchange earnings in addition it is shown that the basic model can be extended in order to explore the effects of government policy on crop composition nutritional status health saving and investment and to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the effects on budget revenues and foreign exchange earnings methodological topics primarily the data requirements of the basic model and its extensions along with aggregation market interaction uncertainty and market imperfections are discussed the most important methodological issues the question of the recursive property of these models is also discussed

sorting and agglomeration economies in french economics departments abstract are agglomeration and peer effects at stake in academic research to tackle this question we study how departments characteristics affect the quantity and quality of academics publications in economics in france controlling for individual time varying characteristics and individual fixed effects department characteristics have an explanatory power at least equal to a quarter of that of individual characteristics and possibly as high as theirs the quantity and quality of an academic s publications in a field increase with the presence of other academics specialised in that field and with the share of the department s publications output in that field in contrast department size proximity to other large departments homogeneity in terms of publication performance presence of colleagues with connections abroad and composition in terms of positions and age matter for some publication measures but only if not controlling for individual fixed effects

trend of subjects published in economics journals 1969 2007 i introduction a fundamental question for any academic discipline is what subjects are people researching this question can be asked in several ways which subjects are economists publishing which subjects are economists reading which subjects have the most impact on the literature which subjects are represented in well respected general subject journals how many specialty journals are dedicated to each subject answers to these questions are useful for strategic planning publication strategy and curriculum design through the identification of shifting focus within the economics discipline for instance the research record of an economist who publishes in a widely published subject field that is little published in leading general subject journals should be evaluated differently from an economist whose fields have the opposite properties a liberal arts college that desires to make more of an impact on the literature may find that the subjects that need to be taught at the undergraduate level are in conflict with the subjects that are being published in top journals a subject area with a small percentage of articles published that has had a strong impact when adjusted for citations may be fertile ground for research although the study of economic research has a long history subject area focus has been little studied morin 1966 examined the sales of chamberlin s theory of monopolistic competition schumpeter s theory of economic development samuelson s foundations of economic analysis friedman s essays in positive economics and becket s economics of discrimination to examine the changes in economics from 1933 to 1964 figuring that most copies of these books were being read by researchers he posited that the changes in the sales of these books indicate shifts in interests within economics fusfeld 1956 examined the departments and types of institutions which were represented by papers at the 1950 1954 american economic association meetings he did not rank these departments but viewed the narrow group of represented schools as a flaw in the program selection niemi 1975 created rankings of the top 100 economics departments and the top southern economics departments according to the number of publications and the number of pages published in a group of 24 journals smith and gold 1976 adjusted niemi for the number of faculty members in each department graves marchand and thompson 1982 built on the work by niemi as well as smith and gold by updating their statistics and providing a trend analysis to examine rankings through time scott and mitias 1996 provided updated rankings by pages published using two different sets of economics journals and created a list of the top 50 economists by pages published davis and papanek 1984 first proposed using citations for ranking economics departments laband 1986 ranked departments based upon the productivity of the graduates of the program using both pages published and citations bodenhorn 1997 ranked liberal arts colleges by citations medoff 1989 ranked individual economists based upon citations and ranks schools based upon the number of top economists employed there although these analyses provide important insights into the productivity of economists and provide a benchmark for hiring and promotion to tenure few have discussed the distribution of subject areas within journals harden liano and chan 2006 calculated the percentage of real estate economics articles published mccain 1991 used article subjects in her cocitation analysis durden and ellis 1991 listed the most oft cited articles in the aer broken down by subject area kim morse and zingales 2006 examined all the articles from 1970 to 2005 that received more than 500 citations they used the econlit database to identify the journal of economic literature jel codes associated with each article

on the robustness of alternative rankings methodologies australian and new zealand economics departments 1988 to 2002 just as friendly arguments based on an ignorance of facts eventually led to the creation of the definitive guinness book of world records any argument about university rankings has seemingly been a problem without a solution to state the obvious alternative rankings methodologies can and do lead to different rankings this article evaluates the robustness of rankings of australian and new zealand economics teaching departments for 1988 to 2002 and 1996 to 2002 using alternative rankings methodologies and compares the results with the rankings obtained by macri and sinha 2006 in the overall mean rankings for both 1988 to 2006 and 1996 to 2002 the university of melbourne is ranked first followed by uwa and anu

trends in rankings of economics departments in the u s an update economics departments in the u s are ranked based on 1 the number of pages published in thirty six economics journals 2 publications in five of the top journals 3 output per faculty member and 4 an index of the concentration of research in a department evidence shows that the top twenty departments have generally retained their positions since the 1970s but rather large changes have occurred in departments ranked from 240 to 100 an economists hall of fame is developed listing the top fifty individual producers of research in the thirty six journal set and the top five journals

nafta s impact on mexico rural household level effects importance of transactions costs and imperfect information in explaining market failures and the functionality of agrarian institutions see bardhan this approach has permitted the analysis of behavioral patterns that previously had been poorly understood but it has been relatively weak for normative purposes aggregate analyses of the impact of trade and policy reforms by contrast have relied on models that generally abstract from these features and postulate instead the existence of perfect markets with exceptions such as surplus labor price regulation fixed nominal exchange rates and mark up prices in certain sectors of the economy these models do not take into account the differential incidence of market failures across households for this rea

the structure of residential energy demand in greece abstract this paper attempts to shed light on the determinants of residential energy demand in greece and to compare it with some other oecd countries from the estimates of the short run and long run elasticities of energy demand for the period 1965 1999 we find that residential energy demand appears to be price inelastic also we do not find evidence of a structural change probably because of the low efficiency of the energy sector we find however that the magnitude of the income elasticity varies substantially between greece and other oecd countries

what s an economics seminar worth information authors and organizers should know es de lille abstract this paper is an empirical study of the publication records of communications to a weekly seminar continued from 1997 we look at the quality of publications and also at the determinants of publications our results offer lessons for both presenters and organizers of research seminars in academia

academic economists behaving badly a survey on three areas of unethical behavior thomas l martin this article measures the degree to which academic economists have engaged in unethical behavior and the degree to which academic economists believe the profession as a whole engages in unethical behavior three main types of unethical behavior are examined 1 falsification of research 2 expropriation of graduate student research or including an undeserving co author on a research paper and 3 exchange of grades for gifts money or sex using a unique data set gathered at the 1998 american economic association aea meetings we find that there is a significant amount of misconduct particularly in the second category jel a11 a13 i introduction both the popular and academic press have noted the existence of falsified research in the hard sciences and in medicine u s nuclear weapons tests conducted in the 1950s came under attack in the 1960s for allegedly using false data and defrauding federal courts concerning the health impact on downwind humans and livestock the discovery of the deception of research subjects and the reporting of fabricated experiments led to a new emphasis in the 1960s and 1970s on the ethics of scientific research shrader frechette 1994 federally funded research in particular came under closer scrutiny of the white house and various executive branch agencies lafollette 1994 recently front page stories in major newspapers have reported that robert p liburdy a cell biologist at lawrence berkeley laboratories resigned after investigators with the office of research integrity of the department of health and human services concluded that he falsified key data tying cancer to electrical power lines schevitz 1999 broad 1999 in economics research with no lives in danger it would seem that such behavior would be easier to rationalize an inflated t ratio here an undeserving co author there who really is hurt by such behavior academic economists after all do not have patients 1 nevertheless most scholars would agree that research is intended to further the pursuit of truth fraudulent or unethical research will poison the well of that scientific truth ethical conduct in research is not a matter of etiquette but a question of the moral principles by which any researcher is guided in the past few decades there have been efforts to examine the ethics of research in the areas of hard science medicine engineering and national security see e g hook 19771 bulmer 1982 sieber 19921 2 a few decades ago our own discipline experienced an unfathomable event the quarterly journal of economics was forced to withdraw a published article after learning that its author had simply copied the work of another economist qje 1984 a similar incident recently occurred in the economics journal kyklos forcing the editors to issue a public apology that included a strong statement plagiarism jeopardizes scientific research kyklos 1999 311 these pieces of evidence suggest that unethical research practices occur within economics but very little nonanecdotal evidence exists to measure the extent of such behavior our study is an attempt to measure the degree to which individual academic economists have engaged in unethical behavior and the degree to which academic economists bel ieve the profession as a whole engages in unethical behavior three main types of behavior are examined 1 falsification of research 2 expropriation of graduate student research or including an undeserving co author and 3 exchange of grades for gifts money or sexual favors we examine the self reported unethical behavior of the profession through anonymous responses because of the extremely sensitive nature of the questions we split the sample by using direct response questions for one group and the added protection of a randomized response technique for the other ii the survey method the ethics surveys were hand delivered to approximately 1 000 academic economists about 20 of the participants attending the january 1998 meetings of the american economic association aea in chicago illinois

fishes ponds and productivity student advisor matching and early career publishing success for economics phds i introduction research productivity is an important concern for members of the academe publishing success is important for individual departments because more productive faculty increases the department s research profile which in turn increases the department s professional reputation as evidence thursby 2000 and ehrenberg and hurst 1998 find that a department s reputation in the national research council nrc ratings increases with published research while smyth 1999 finds that pages published in the top 5 journals have a greater impact than pages published in other journals publishing success is important for individual faculty members because peer reviewed publications have long been shown to be economic currency for academic economists bratsberg ragan and warren 2003 moore newman and turnbull 1998 sauer 1988 among others research promise is important for graduate students because students with the greatest promise for productive careers are likely to receive the best initial job placements buchmueller dominitz and hansen 1999 krueger and wu 2000 long 1978 indeed according to a survey of hiring departments carson and navarro 1988 every single top 20 domestic economics program considered the quality of one s research agenda to be of moderate to great importance in the hiring decision an important question then is how to identify which factors are associated with the likelihood of having a more productive research career to date empirical studies have focused on the program from which the student graduated recent examples include collins cox and stango 2000 davis huston and patterson 2001 stock and alston 2000 this focus implicitly assumes that because only the very best students become enrolled in elite programs graduates of highly ranked programs should hold the greatest promise for publishing success 1 in support coupe 2001 and buchmueller dominitz and hansen 1999 find that students graduating from top programs are more likely to publish in core economics journals while hogan 1981 finds that students graduating from programs with more active faculty publish more journal articles before placing total faith in these results however members of the academe should ask whether such findings hold across all points in the graduate distribution or whether they are only accurate predictors on average previously published data clearly suggest the latter for instance buchmueller dominitz and hansen 1999 find that 30 of tier 1 graduates do not publish any academic articles within the first 9 yr after phd receipt while 50 do not publish any top 50 articles as defined by liebowitz and palmer 1984 in other words there is a large amount of unexplained variability in the future success of a program s graduates krueger and wu 2000 93 consequently it is likely that significant overlap exists between the performance of top program graduates and lesser program graduates with significant portions of the latter outperforming significant portions of the former with this in mind the question becomes is there a readily observable factor that is a less noisy predictor of a student s likelihood for publishing success we argue that there is during a student s postgraduate education one of the most significant influences is his or her dissertation advisor we posit that for timing reasons advisors will possess additional insight into a student s true research potential that was not available to the admission committee when deciding whether to admit the student into the program consequently we expect a student s dissertation advisor to be a more informed predictor of his or her early career productivity than the program from which he or she receives the phd 2 in other words we believe that considering the identity of a student s dissertation advisor in addition to the quality of the program from which the student receives the phd should help reduce the uncertainty inherent in predicting the student s position within the early career productivity distribution

european economics an analysis based on publications in the core journals abstract in this paper we provide a ranking of european economics institutions and countries based on publications in a core set of 10 economic journals from 1991 to 1996 we find that the three leading universities in europe are the london school of economics tel aviv university and oxford university while the three top ranked countries are the u k france and israel

ranking economics departments worldwide on the basis of phd placement an objective ranking of economics departments worldwide in terms of graduate education is derived the central idea is that the value of a department is the sum of the values of its phd graduates as reflected in the values of their current employing departments the scores are thus derived as solutions to a linear system of simultaneous equations in the values the sample includes the top fifty four departments the composition of which is determined endogenously using a criterion requiring a minimum of four placements in the departments comprising the sample two other related rankings are proposed which place more emphasis on more recent faculty recruitments the results point to a very high concentration in the economics phd education market worldwide confirming the dominance of the top u s departments in particular of harvard and m i t nevertheless a modest de concentration trend is under way the rankings are in close agreement with the 1994 national research council survey ranking based on the perceived quality of phd programs

how do journal quality co authorship and author order affect agricultural economists salaries utilizing an original data set containing annual salaries and peer reviewed publication histories for 326 faculty members from top ranked ph d granting programs we examine the labor market for academic agricultural economists the results suggest that higher quality publications have a greater impact on annual earnings that sole authored articles have a higher return than multi authored articles and that no wage premium exists for being the lead author of a non alphabetic article

energy development potential an analysis of brazil abstract this paper develops an indicator for the energy development potential edp of 27 brazilian states this indicator uses data on a state s infrastructure and its supply of and demand for energy the indicator measures the data for three periods the first part of the 1990s which is a period of low economic growth the first part of the 2000s which is a period of high economic growth but with a historical crisis in the brazilian energy sector and 2009 2011 which is a period of economic growth after the energy crisis using a factor analysis we are able to identify three factors for edp they are the demand for energy the supply of renewable energy and the supply of nonrenewable energy we use these factors to classify the brazilian states according to their edp and to perform an exploratory spatial data analysis esda by using the moran indicators and the local indicators of spatial association lisa

a worldwide assessment of scientific production in economics 1992 1997 the aim of this article is to analyse the worldwide production in economics to that end bibliometric indicators are constructed by way of a database made up of 55 international journals covering the period 1992 1997 a ranking of the leading thousand international affiliations is established and quality indices of the first 200 are presented finally a detailed analysis is carried out at country level and with respect to the 12 leading countries

unraveling the academic productivity of economists the opportunity costs of teaching and service this study investigates the relationships among research productivity teaching and service on the basis of individual specific information involving approximately 715 academic economists responding to an online survey these economists provided information regarding their teaching and service commitments as well as personal and institutional information the publication record of each respondent was then obtained from econlit together these data constitute a rich field for the systematic study of research productivity results of a tobit analysis reveal much about the nature of research productivity underscoring for instance the importance of gender coauthorship presen tations at conferences and peers who publish among the more important findings from this analysis is that both teaching and service commitments have a significantly negative impact on the research productivity of academic economists these relations hold across types of academic employer though to varying degrees taken together the results provide interesting insights into the roles of academic scholars teachers and colleagues

reputational capital and academic pay geoffrey k turnbull i introduction economists continue to have a strong interest in academic labor markets as the steady stream of earnings studies over the past several decades readily attests the academic labor market draws the attention of economists not only because it is a topic of direct personal interest but also because it presents an opportunity to examine general theories of labor markets in a context with which the researcher has intimate experience nonetheless important questions about how the market values research teaching and service remain unanswered to what extent does the market reward quality versus quantity of published research or team production in the form of co authorship furthermore how durable is reputational capital for individuals whose research productivity diminishes during their career ultimately these questions relate in one way or another to the nature of the incentive structure faced by academic economists we provide new evidence concerning the role of research quality co authorship administrative service and teaching performance in the production of reputational capital in addition we explore the question of the durability of reputational capital once some of these activities cease we assume that the quantity and quality of published research largely determines an individual s reputational capital in the external market to help us sort out the separate effects on reputational capital of both the quality and quantity of research activity we measure research quality by both journal quality and career citations employing an interactive quantity quality term a related question concerns the role of team production in building an individual s reputational capital do individuals receive differential returns to publishing single authored versus co authored research papers this is an interesting question in light of the substantial increase in co authorship over the last few decades 1 one explanation of this trend is that the academic market has presented scholars with increasing opportunities for specialization in the production of knowledge and that team production involves the combination of complementary skilled researchers if team production reflects complementarities in the production of research we should observe little difference in the returns to single versus co authored work another explanation is that co authorship involves the combination of substitute skilled researchers so that co authorship presents a way for individuals to reduce their research efforts without reducing their individual measured research output to the extent that co authorshi p represents such substitution the market should fully discount the returns to multiple authored papers in this article we also move beyond identifying the factors that enhance an individual s reputation in the market to study the question of the durability of reputational capital some individuals quit publishing once they are tenured or promoted while others experience lengthy but temporary breaks in their flow of research output we examine the potential penalties associated with gaps in research output providing the first empirical evidence concerning the durability of reputational capital for academic economists in order to ensure that our analysis deals with these issues in a way that is most relevant to a large portion of the market for academic economists we use data from several research universities but restrict the sample frame to a single discipline economics much of the previous work estimating how publications or other factors affect academic salaries typically use data from a single university with earnings equations estimated across disciplines restricting the sample to a single discipline has the additional advantage of reducing potential heterogeneity problems associated with measuring productivity across disciplines in addition our data enable us more thoroughly to explore the empirical issues in the debate since they permit more precise measures of the past and current productivity of individuals engaged in comparable work

journals preferences and publishing in agricultural and environmental economics research quality is an increasingly important metric for determining funding allocations promotion and tenure and professional prestige a key metric often used as a proxy for research quality is the ranking of the journal in which a manuscript appears while citation based measures of journal quality are commonly used less is known about other dimensions of journal quality and prestige we report results from an international study using best worst scaling to investigate researchers journal preferences respondents used two criteria to assess journals the impact a paper in the journal would have on career progression and the impact beyond academia of papers in the journal among the sample of journals studied the american journal of agricultural economics is ranked at the top for career progression for the aggregate sample while science was rated at the top for broader impact we find no significant correlation between the journal scores based on the two criteria nor between them and the journals impact factors these results suggest that impact beyond academia is poorly aligned with career incentives and that citation measures reflect poorly if at all peers esteem of journals heteroscedastic scale adjusted latent class models reveal marked heterogeneity in journal preferences related to researchers institutional affiliation and geographic region we find significant differences in error variance over people and choices people were less consistent when choosing their least as opposed to their most preferred journal this finding has broader implications given the burgeoning use of best worst surveys

ranking economics departments in europe a statistical approach we provide a ranking of economics departments in europe and we discuss the methods used to obtain it the jel cd rom serves as a database for a period covering 10 years journals are ranked using a combination of expert opinions and citation data to produce a scale from 1 to 10 the publication output and habits of fifteen european countries plus california are then compared individuals with a contribution greater than a predetermined minimum level are regrouped into departments which are ranked according to their total scores a standard deviation is provided to underline the uncertainty of this ranking

does raiding explain the negative returns to faculty seniority i introduction economists have studied various aspects of faculty mobility research shows that turnover is greater among nonunion faculty rees 1994 female faculty average slightly more employers than male faculty barbezat and hughes 2001 ginther and kahn 2004 1 the responsiveness of turnover to relative pay diminishes with rank ehrenberg kasper and rees 1991 and research productivity enhances prospects for upward mobility ault rutman and stevenson 1979 1982 coupe smeets and warzynski 2005 still questions remain unanswered where do faculty go when they leave a university how does faculty turnover vary with time at a university what percentage of faculty move upward and what percentage move downward because of tenure denials or the prospect of being turned down for tenure the present article contributes to our understanding of these issues but its primary objective was to use data on faculty mobility to provide insights on another issue returns to academic seniority the negative returns to seniority that many studies find are commonly attributed to one of two factors 2 the first view is that negative returns reflect monopsony power on the part of universities faculty with high mobility costs acquire high seniority and because they are unlikely to move they are paid less than equally productive faculty that employers view as more likely to leave a competing explanation is that highly productive faculty are raided according to this story returns to seniority are biased negatively because faculty with high seniority tend to have low unmeasured productivity the best faculty are bid away moving on to better jobs those who remain are the faculty without outside offers and the negative returns estimated for senior faculty actually reflect a penalty for low unmeasured productivity rather than a true penalty for seniority the raiding story has several implications first estimated returns to seniority should become less negative the more fully the productivity is measured second estimated returns should be less negative once we control for faculty who are bid away finally and of particular importance estimated returns to seniority should not be negative for faculty who are bid away the faculty for whom unmeasured productivity is presumably high with the right data set these hypotheses can be tested rejection of the raiding hypothesis would provide tacit evidence of monoposony in academic markets 3 this article contributes to the literature in several ways it is the first research to directly test the raiding hypothesis it provides a detailed look at faculty mobility in one segment of the academic labor market it extends and improves bratsberg ragan and warren 2003 in the following ways it expands the sample to cover three decades of faculty pay records it includes additional controls for productivity number and types of books recent and prospective articles and so forth resulting in the most complete specification of research productivity to date and it allows for heterogeneity in the seniority penalty via phd pedigree and direction of move finally it tests for the possibility that the academic job market does a better job of matching faculty and universities in recent years as might be expected because of the information revolution the sample consists of five public phd granting universities in the midwest we track all tenure track economics faculty employed in these universities over a 30 yr period we measure their productivity their pay and their mobility as such the study provides a rich and detailed investigation of one subset of economics programs it is possible that mobility may be greater in urban areas where faculty can more readily obtain alternative employment without relocating and prior research indicates that pay structures depend on the university s stature and its relative emphasis on research and teaching

leading institutional contributors to the elite economic journals given the prestige enjoyed by several economic departments there is a natural curiosity regarding their contributions to the economic literature this article analyses the appearance of all academic institutions worldwide in the eight leading economic journals the blue ribbon eight from 1991 to 2005 we cite those institutions who appear the most and analyse the composition of appearances across all eight journals to assess their degree of diversity while it is tempting to use these measures as a ranking of institutions the analysis is meant to be purely an historical appreciation of the contributions of these admirable institutions

the institutional concentration of authors in top journals of economics during the last two decades this paper addresses the institutional concentration of authors in 15 top economics journals from 1977 to 1997 the concentration of authors phd affiliations is substantially higher than the concentration of authors current affiliations relating input indicators such as population number of universities with economics departments or manpower in economics to publication output reduces the us dominance considerably whereas israel and the united kingdom come out excellently exporters and importers of phds among universities are identified concentration ratios like the herfindahl index lack a clear time trend nevertheless the position of the united states has been weakening in recent years

are there gender differences in the job mobility patterns of academic economists labor economic theory posits that job mobil ity should affect worker salaries the degree to which this holds for academic faculty has received considerable attention prior empirical studies have estimated log wage regressions that control for both years of total work experience and years of seniority at the current institution in an effort to determine whether negative returns to seniority exist in academic labor markets for example bernt bratsberg james ragan and jim warren 2003 and william moore robert turnbull and geoffrey newman 1998 for aca demic economists michael ransom 1993 kevin hallock 1995 and emily hoffman 1976 for specific institutions debra a barbezat and michael r donihue 1998 and barbezat 1989 for

poverty policies and deforestation the case of mexico this study examines the determinants and policy implications of deforestation in mexico and includes a brief review of the relevant empirical literature and a description of the theoretical model land use patterns and socioeconomic and physiogeographic factors are determinants data were obtained from digital maps of land use and soils and the 1990 population and 1991 agricultural censuses a simple 2 period equation formalizes the relationship between deforestation and poverty government policies and local land tenure in period 1 representative producers in municipalities have 4 options in allocating labor time wage generation agricultural production deforestation on land without clear property rights and investment in technology during period 2 the options are to farm on available land and deforested areas or work in the wage sector findings reveal that 1 communal land tenure ownership by the ejido did not increase deforestation 2 pricing that favors maize production which is very land intensive increased deforestation and technical assistance reduced deforestation and 3 poverty was related to higher rates of deforestation prices were the most important immediate factor in unsustainable resource use but other factors had an impact the government policy mix did not support sustainable development reduced subsidies would benefit the environment the government should provide safety nets to increase the level of rural investment and reduce poverty and should improve land productivity with technical inputs trade liberalization and elimination of subsidies should be sensitive to the poors need for real wages

spatially uneven development and low carbon transitions insights from urban and regional planning the ageing of existing energy system infrastructure the threat of climate change and uncertainty in the movement of energy prices have resulted in a widespread agreement on the need for a transition to a low carbon energy system yet the nature of this transition i e what when how and where and its socio economic outcomes at different scales are not well understood the interdependence of the energy sector and economic growth has been mostly studied at the national level via some general equilibrium or econometric models whilst sub national studies at community or urban levels mostly focus on the governance of transitions hence we suggest that a regional perspective to energy policy and research promises to integrate these two approaches by providing a more robust and comprehensive understanding of the implications of low carbon transitions as well as contributing to the development of more effective policies by building on recent ideas on geographical aspects of energy transitions this article offers insights on the changing relationship between the spatial organisation of economic activities and energy systems and identifies tools and methods from urban and regional planning to help with the delivery of efficient and equitable policy outcomes

negative returns to seniority and job mobility across the program quality distribution are top public phd granting programs different we analyze a unique data set containing annual salary and detailed job and publication histories for a sample of 1 009 faculty members drawn from 53 public ph d granting economics departments empirical results suggest that all else equal 1 statistically significant negative returns to seniority exist within lower ranked but not top 15 programs 2 more frequent movers observe statistically higher annual salaries in lower ranked but not top 15 programs and 3 for each level of seniority faculty in top 15 programs are more likely to move at any point in the career than faculty in lower ranked programs

environmental and ecological economics a citation analysis this study looks at two distinct questions dwhat have been the most influential journal articles in environmental economics and ecological economics over the 10 year period 1994 2003 t and dhow much overlap is there between the fields of environmental and ecological economics t we examine the references in all articles published in jeem and ecological economics ee over this period for each of these two fields a list of the top articles and top journals cited by articles published in jeem and ee is presented we also present some results based on our study of the isi journal citation reports we find that there is a significant overlap between the two fields at the journal level the two journals cite similar journals there is a correlation of 0 34 between the number of citations received by the journals that are most cited and the correlation is even higher if journal self citation is excluded the main differences are that ecological economics tends to cite but not be cited by general natural science journals more often than environmental economics does environmental economics cites more heavily from journals rather than other publications and citations in environmental economics are more concentrated on particular journals and individual publications however there is much less similarity at the level of individual articles nonmarket valuation articles dominate the most cited articles in jeem while green accounting sustainability and the environmental kuznets curve are all prominent topics in ee d 2005 elsevier b v all rights reserved

meso economic filters along the policy chain understanding the links between policy reforms and rural poverty in latin america abstract the paper clarifies the meso economy concept by defining it as comprising both the market mechanisms and administrative procedures through which policy decisions and market signals trickle down to the household level three main bodies of literature are reviewed the policy oriented literature in which the meso economy was initially considered the transaction cost approach analyzing market and policy failures and the micro economy level of agricultural household models the paper develops a synthesis of macro meso and micro economic perspectives which focuses on the roles played by three levels of filters intervening along the policy chain implications for policy and research are drawn

the effects of publication lags on life cycle research productivity in economics we investigate how increases in publication delays have affected the life cycle of publications of recent ph d graduates in economics we construct a panel dataset of 14 271 individuals who were awarded ph d s between 1986 and 2000 in u s and canadian economics departments for this population of scholars we amass complete records of publications in peer reviewed journals listed in the jel a total of 368 672 observations we find evidence of significantly diminished productivity in recent relative to earlier cohorts when productivity of an individual is measured by the number of aer equivalent publications diminished productivity is less evident when the number of aer equivalent pages is used instead our findings are consistent with earlier empirical findings of increasing editorial delays decreasing acceptance rates at journals and a trend toward longer manuscripts this decline in productivity is evident in both graduates of top 30 and non top 30 ranked economics departments and may have important implications for what should constitute a tenurable record we also find that the research rankings of top economics departments are a surprisingly poor predictor of the subsequent research rankings of their ph d s graduates jel a11 j24 j29 j44

the evolution of the scientific productivity of highly productive economists this paper studies the evolution of research productivity of a sample of economists working in the best 81 departments in the world in 2007 the main novelty is that in so far as a productivity distribution can be identified with an income distribution we measure productivity mobility in a dynamic context using an indicator inspired in an income mobility index suggested by fields 2010 for a two period world productivity is measured in terms of publications weighted by the citation impact of the journals where each article is published in the periodical literature we study the evolution of average productivity productivity inequality the extent of rank reversals and productivity mobility for seven cohorts as well as the population as a whole we offer new evidence confirming previous results about the heterogeneity of the evolution of productivity for top and other researchers however the major result is that contrary to what was expected for our sample of very highly productive scholars the effect of rank reversals between the two periods on overall productivity mobility offsets the effect of an increase in productivity inequality from the first to the second period in the youngest five out of seven cohorts jel a11 a12 b41 d63 i32

fame and the fortune of academic economists how the market rewards influential research in economics we analyze the pay and position of 1 009 faculty members who teach in doctoral granting economics departments at fifty three large public universities in the united states using the web of science we have identified the journal articles published by these scholars and the number of times each of these articles has been subsequently cited in published research articles we find that research influence as measured by various measures of total citations is a surprisingly strong predictor of the salary and the prestige of the department in which professors are employed we also examine how coauthorship is rewarded by the market

meat meets meta a quantitative review of the price elasticity of meat the price elasticity of meat has been estimated in numerous studies that utilize a variety of disparate modeling procedures in light of differences in the literature a meta analysis is performed to assess the sensitivity of the meat price elasticity to a number of characteristics including the type of meat specification of demand nature of data estimation method characteristics of the publication outlet and location of demand the results from estimating linear and box cox meta regressions coupled with different panel data treatments reveal that these characteristics have differing influence on the reported price elasticity

land property rights and international migration evidence from mexico abstract in this paper i ask whether there is a relationship between land property rights and international migration in order to identify the impact of property rights i consider a country wide land certification program that took place in mexico in the 1990s my identification strategy exploits the staggered implementation and the households eligibility for the program i find that the program increased the eligible households likelihood of having one or more members abroad by 12 in terms of the number of migrants my coefficient estimates explain 26 of the 1994 1997 increase in migrants from ejido areas and 13 15 of the increase from all of mexico consistent with our theoretical model the impact is strongest for households without a land will this implies that land inheritance issues drive at least part of the effect

academic pay in the united kingdom and the united states the differential returns to productivity and the lifetime earnings gap this paper estimates earnings functions for two samples of u k and u s academic economists despite significant differences in compensation schemes a comparably specified human capital earnings model does a good job explaining earnings variations for academic economists in both countries our estimates suggest that rewards for research are more immediate and direct in the united states because of the national salary scale the payoffs to experience and seniority are greater and the payoffs to research are lower in the united kingdom than in the united states after adjusting for productivity and demographic factors we find that u s economists are paid approximately 40 more than otherwise equivalent economists in the united kingdom simulating career age earnings profiles for both markets we find that the earnings gap widens with experience for relatively productive research economists and may even narrow with age for relatively less productive research economists nevertheless the cumulative lifetime earnings foregone are substantial for research and nonresearch economists in the united kingdom

citations or journal quality which is rewarded more in the academic labor market research quality can be evaluated from citations or from the prestige of journals publishing the research we relate salary of tenured university of california uc economists to their lifetime publications of 5 500 articles and to the 140 000 citations to these articles citations hardly affect salary especially in top ranked uc departments where impacts of citations are less than one tenth those of journals in lower ranked departments and when journal quality is less comprehensively measured effects of citations on salary increase if journal quality is just measured by counting articles in journal tiers apparent effects of citations are overstated jel a14 j44

which journal rankings best explain academic salaries evidence from the university of california the ranking of an academic journal is important to authors universities journal publishers and research funders rankings are gaining prominence as countries adopt regular research assessment exercises that especially reward publication in high impact journals yet even within a rankings oriented discipline like economics there is no agreement on how aggressively lower ranked journals are down weighted and in how wide is the universe of journals considered moreover since it is typically less costly for authors to cite superfluous references whether of their own volition or prompted by editors than it is to ignore relevant ones rankings based on citations may be easily manipulated in contrast when the merits of publication in one journal or another are debated during hiring promotion and salary decisions the evaluators are choosing over actions with costly consequences we therefore look to the academic labor market using data on economists in the university of california system to relate their lifetime publications in 700 different academic journals to salary we test amongst various sets of journal rankings and publication discount rates to see which are most congruent with the returns implied by the academic labor market jel a14 i23 j44

on the search for talent in academic labor markets easily observable later graduate study outcomes as predictors of early career publishing placement and tenure three easily observed later graduate study outcomes working with a prominent advisor publishing while in graduate school and coauthoring with the advisor are demonstrated to be significant determinants of early career publishing success for a sample of nearly 3 000 ph d recipients from more than 100 domestic programs between 1990 and 1993 out of sample predictions for 681 ph d recipients from the class of 1994 indicate that these easily observed later graduate study signals dramatically improve our ability to forecast which students become prolific and which students fail to publish more than one article analyzing initial domestic tenure track economics placements indicates that hiring departments placed far more emphasis on ph d program pedigree leading to an initial tenure rate of less than 50 but eventually nearly three fourths currently hold tenured positions in the united states jel j24 j44

agricultural trade liberalization and low income countries a general equilibrium multimarket approach integrated multimarket general equilibrium models are constructed to analyze the impact on poor cereal importers of rising world prices following oecd trade liberalization archetypes contrast african countries in which cereal imports are not competitive with domestic production africa i to african and asian countries where they are competitive results show rising food import bills and exchange rate depreciation in africa i and the opposite in the other two regions policy implications include promoting agricultural exports from africa i and promoting food crops for import substitution in the other regions food aid needed to shelter the poor during the transition period is calculated

cracks in the glass ceiling gender and promotion in the economics profession gender differences in promotion within the economics profession have long been a concern of the committee on the status of women in the economics profession cswep in a descriptive analysis of the aea universal academic questionnaire rebecca blank 1996 finds that hires and promotions to the associateand fullprofessor levels have averaged 4 2 and 2 7 percentage points below the share of female assistants and associates professors respectively thus women appear to be underrepresented in senior positions suggesting they may face a glass ceiling this paper uses unique panel data for american economic association aea members to examine formally whether there are differences across gender in promotion probabilities an academic labor market beyond its direct interest to economists is well suited to study possible gender differences in promotion because departments can be ranked within the profession and because professors can be ranked within a department by a welldefined promotion hierarchy a focus on academic economists offers an additional advantage in that on the job productivity can be measured directly by research output other promotion studies have had limited controls for productivity and have used cross sectional data which do not permit controls for unobserved ability e g rudolf winter ebmer and josef zweimuller 1997 failure to account for gender differences in unobserved productivity could produce biased inference prior promotion studies also have generally relied on job advancement indexes that limit the distinction between initial job assignment i e an

do academic salaries decline with seniority this article reexamines the negative seniority earnings relationship for academic economists the empirical results show that the anomalous negative seniority effect found in earlier academic market studies holds in the absence of direct measures of research productivity the negative effect however eventually disappears as more comprehensive measures of publishing citations and other productivity measures are included in the wage equation to control for the quantity and quality of faculty productivity faculty with greater seniority appear to be rewarded relatively less simply because many have been relatively less productive than their colleagues with less seniority at similar stages in their careers

assessing editorial preferences towards industrial organization articles in order to evaluate the relative importance of articles on industrial organization published in major generalist or specialized scientific journals this empirical study has used the new 1991 jel classification system by regrouping contributions according to the type of article theoretical analysis industrial policy or industry studies a rate of multiple reference index has been introduced to examine the degree of relation between these three categories and used as a proxy for editorial preferences towards the type of treatment of the subject usually expected by the journal the article contents of nine generalist and five specialized journals are analysed for the two periods 1991 1995 and 1996 2000

research productivity of the economics profession in east asia i introduction research productivity is often ranked for economics departments based on page counts of journal publications for example graves marchand and thompson 1982 while others rate the departments by the number of citations attributed to their faculty for example davis and papanek 1984 recently scott and mitias 1996 used flow and stock concepts in their departmental rankings while the flow of research can be counted to give credit to the department where authors are affiliated at the time of publication the stock ranking counts a currently affiliated faculty s stock of past and current research the alternative rankings also use different sets of journals as well as varied weighting schemes to standardize the length of journal pages and to adjust for journal quality while several different methods have been used to rank economics departments in the united states no such assessment has been done for east asian universities this article aims to fill this gap by ranking economics professions in east asia based solely on research productivity for the purpose of comparison with u s universities our methodology closely follows that of scott and mitias 1996 with some variations in the sample length first the ranking counts the stock of past and current research for example hogan 1984 laband 1985 conroy and dusansky 1995 scott and mitias 1996 and dusansky and vernon 1998 fine research scholars move from one university to another a phenomenon that sometimes leads to dramatic changes in school performance however labor mobility depends to some extent on the degree of importance of research to which a university is attached more open and research oriented schools often hire researchers and their accompanying stock of published research from other institutions in the region or more often from abroad while others more or less insulate themselves from inflows of new research a more accurate reflection of current reality is therefore to know who is at a particular university today not who was at it in the past thus economics faculty affiliated with east asian universities during the autumn 1997 semester are counted for the stock ranking in east asia the economics faculty include all economists in business schools as well as all in economics departments 1 faculty names were obtained directly from department chairs and each school s home page on the internet second the basic ranking relies on page counts of articles published in a set of 36 quality journals over the period 1990 96 page counts are employed to capture many variations in the length of articles across journals the econlit cd rom september 1997 includes all international journals that have appeared in the journal of economic literature the choice of a set of quality journals is however open to question graves marchand and thompson 1982 for example examined publications in a set of 24 journals hogan 1984 looked at a set of 4 laband 1985 a set of 27 bairam 1994 a set of 5 and conroy and dusansky 1995 and dusansky and vernon 1998 each a set of 8 journals the criterion employed here for top 36 journals relies on the choice in scott and mitias 1996 in which the original set of top 24 journals in graves marchand and thompson 1982 was updated 2 to check the sensitivity of our findings with alternative sets of journals we ranked these schools based on top 24 and top 42 journals the list of 42 top journals was provided to us by dusansky and vernon 1998 3 third standardized page counts are employed for example graves marchand and thompson 1982 hirsch austin brooks and moore 1984 conroy and dusansky 1995 scott and mitias 1996 and dusansky and vernon 1998 the scott mitias 1996 conversion factors are used for the basic ranking in which the number of pages published in 36 journals were standardized to the average length of a page in the aer

citations in economics measurement uses and impacts i describe and compare sources of data on citations in economics and the statistics derived from them constructing data sets of the post publication citation histories of articles published in the top five journals in the 1970s and 2000s i examine distributions and life cycles of citations compare citation histories of articles in different subspecialties in economics and present evidence on the history and heterogeneity of those journals impacts and the marginal citation productivity of additional coauthors i use a new data set of the lifetime citation histories of over 1 000 economists from thirty universities to rank economics departments by various measures and demonstrate the importance of intra and interdepartmental heterogeneity in productivity throughout the discussion summarizes earlier work including the impacts of citations on salaries and nonmonetary rewards and how citations reflect judgments about research quality in economics and the importance of economic ideas