agenda restrictions in multi issue bargaining abstract we study a bilateral multi issue bargaining procedure with complete information and endogenous agenda in the procedure proposals must be made on only one issue at a time although the proposer can choose which issue to bring to the table when bargaining frictions are small there is a large multiplicity of equilibrium agreements including ones with delay however equilibrium payoffs cannot be made arbitrarily small perpetual disagreement cannot be supported in equilibrium this multiplicity contrasts with the uniqueness found in the literature for a procedure where offers can be made in any subset of remaining issues

wage employment contracts this paper studies the efficient agreements about the dependence of workers earnings on employment when the employment level is controlled by firms the firms superior information about profitability conditions is responsible for this form of contract governance under plausible assumptions such agreements will cause employment to diverge from efficiency as a byproduct of their attempt to mitigate risk it is shown that if leisure is a normal good and firms are risk neutral employment is always above the efficient level such a one period implicit contracting model cannot therefore be used to explain unemployment as a rational byproduct of risk sharing between workers and a risk neutral firm under conditions of asymmetric information

contracts as a barrier to entry it is shown that an incumbent seller who faces a threat of entry into his or her market will sign long term contracts that prevent the entry of some lower cost producers even though they do not preclude entry completely moreover when a seller possesses superior information about the likelihood of entry it is shown that the length of the contract may act as a signal of the true probability of entry

one to many bargaining when pairwise agreements are non renegotiable abstract we study a model where a central player the principal bargains bilaterally with each of several players the agents to create and share the surplus of a coalitional game it is known that if the payments that were previously agreed with each of the remaining agents are renegotiated in case any bilateral negotiation permanently breaks down then the shapley value is the unique efficient and individual rational outcome consistent with bilateral nash bargaining here we show that when instead the agreed payments cannot be renegotiated the outcome is also unique but it now coincides with the nucleolus of an associated bankruptcy problem we provide a strategic foundation for this outcome then we study how such renegotiation affects the principal s payoff according to the properties of the surplus function we find for example that renegotiation benefits the principal when agents are complements and it hurts him when they are substitutes situations with respectively increasing and decreasing marginal contributions

accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models abstract within ecological economics there is recognition of the need for new approaches to decision making to support sustainable development initiatives there is an increasing acknowledgement of the limitations of cost benefit analysis approaches as a measure of the un sustainability of organizational activities these are viewed as particularly inappropriate within the participatory settings that sustainable development proponents seek to foster they also fail to deal with the highly contested nature of sustainable development discourse in contemporary pluralist democracies while advances have been made in the field of multi criteria decision making there is still a relative dearth of versatile models that accommodate monetization in a way that recognizes the limits of calculative technologies this article introduces readers to developments within the accounting discipline designed to support sustainable development decision making and evaluation in particular it proposes sustainability assessment models as a viable alternative to cost benefit analysis sustainability assessment models are based on an inter disciplinary approach that recognizes the need for accountings that facilitate more participatory forms of decision making and accountability as such they address many of the weaknesses in current approaches to cost benefit analysis the authors first experiences with sustainability assessment models were with bp and the united kingdom oil and gas sector where models were developed as a means of making previously external costs more central to organizational decision making later work has included exploration of a range of decision making situations in private and public sector organizations in both the united kingdom and new zealand this has involved more explicit attention to plural values and issues of participation dialogue and democracy

a theory of contracts with limited enforcement we present a theory of contracts under costly enforcement in the context of a dynamic relationship between an uninformed buyer and a seller who is privately informed on his persistent cost at the outset public enforcement relies on remedies for breach private enforcement comes from severing relationships we first characterize aggregate enforcement constraints ensuring that trading partners do not breach contracts unduly whether a long term contract is enforceable does not depend on the distribution of penalties for breach between the buyer and the seller while under complete information the optimal contract would remain stationary non stationarity might arise under asymmetric information enforcement constraints are time dependent and easier to satisfy as time passes indeed a high cost seller may be tempted to trade high volumes at high prices at the beginning of the relationship before breaching the contract later on yet such take the money and run strategy becomes less attractive as time passes and can be prevented with backloaded payments the optimal contract thus goes through two different phases first quantities and prices increase at the inception of the relationship later on the contract looks more stationary the public and private sides of enforcement plays different roles in determining the length of the earlier phase of contracting long run screening distortions encapsulate the quality of enforcement offering de facto a link between the quality of the legal system and contractual performances

dynamic contracting under adverse selection and renegotiation abstract we study the effects of renegotiation in an infinitely repeated screening model with long term contracts we propose a simple and tractable recursive formulation to study equilibria in which the monopolist s profit is maximized after every history we show that the monopolist sequentially screens high type consumers and characterize second degree price discrimination policies the monopolist s ability to extract rent from high type consumers by distorting the allocation of low type consumers vanishes as all parties become more patient as a result all distortions disappear and the allocation becomes efficient

make and buy balancing bargaining power abstract we analyze the optimal procurement of labor which can be supplied either internally based on wage negotiations or acquired at terms negotiated with an external subcontractor the novel feature of our model is that the subcontractor s bargaining power is a function of the proportion of output outsourced we demonstrate analytically how multiple sourcing emerges as an organizational mechanism to balance cost advantages associated with outsourcing against a subcontractor s increased bargaining power we find that the optimal proportion of outsourcing is lower with sequential negotiations than with simultaneous negotiations if the supplier to first negotiate can foreclose subsequent negotiations

endogenous incomplete contracts a bargaining approach in this paper we argue that by modelling the contracting process as a bargaining game one can endogenize the choice between complete and incomplete contracts this point is demonstrated within a stylized model in which agents can allocate an endowment stream either via a once for all bargain over the entire stream a long term contract or through a series of bargaining rounds a short term contract within this structure short term contracts arise as equilibrium outcomes under very general conditions because a short term contract implies reduced bargaining costs for one of the agents in essence reduced transaction costs produce a short term contract jel classification l14 c78

on the role of confidentiality and deadlines in bilateral negotiations abstract the preference between public and private negotiations for a buyer who sequentially visits two sellers is examined it is shown that the buyer weakly prefers private negotiations so as to create strategic uncertainty about the trade history with substitute goods such uncertainty is valuable only when price offers have short deadlines that prevent a head to head competition with complementary goods strategic uncertainty is valuable to the extent that price coordination becomes a concern for sellers which is likely to be the case when sellers possess high bargaining powers their price offers have short deadlines and or goods are weak complements sellers strategic deadline choices as well as their incentives to disclose information about negotiations are also investigated

multifirm unions and the incentive to adopt pattern bargaining in oligopoly abstract this paper develops a model of wage bargaining between an industry wide trade union and firms in an oligopoly and considers the circumstances under which the union prefers pattern bargaining that is negotiating contracts in a sequential manner to simultaneous bargaining with the firms the paper goes on to consider the importance of the bargaining order in pattern bargaining when the firms are asymmetric the analysis shows that the union gains by first targeting a firm which is in a relatively weak bargaining position i e impatient to settle or a firm with relatively large profits

payoff uncertainty bargaining power and the strategic sequencing of bilateral negotiations this article investigates the sequencing choice of a buyer who negotiates with the sellers of two complementary objects with uncertain payoffs the possibility of inefficient trade may generate strict sequencing preference the buyer begins with the weaker seller if the sellers have diverse bargaining powers and with the stronger one if both sellers are strong bargainers this sequencing is likely to increase the social surplus moreover the buyer may find it optimal to raise her own acquisition cost by committing to a minimum purchase price or outsourcing the first and second mover advantages for the sellers are also identified

foundations of dynamic monopoly and the coase conjecture subgame perfect equilibria are characterized for a market in which the seller quotes a price each period assume zero costs positive interest rate continuum of buyers and some technical conditions if buyers valuations are positive then equilibrium is unique buyers strategies are stationary and the price sequence is determinant along the equilibrium path but possibly randomized elsewhere otherwise a continuum of stationary equilibria can exist but at most one with analytic strategies coase s conjecture is verified for stationary strategies reducing the period length drives all prices to zero or the least valuation connections to bargaining models are described journal qf economic literature classification

concessions of infrastructure in latin america government led renegotiation this paper analyzes government led renegotiations in infrastructure concession contracts in latin america based on the same sample used in guasch laffont and straub 2003 to examine firm led renegotiations after extending the theoretical framework to a multiple period context in which both pareto improving and rent shifting renegotiations at the initiative of the government can occur we develop an original instrumental variable strategy to address the issue of contract endogeneity and derive empirical results while some of the main insights concerning the importance of having a regulator in place when awarding concessions and the fragility of price cap regulatory schemes are unchanged significant differences arise with respect to the effect of investment and financing as well as the corruption variables we provide evidence that a good regulatory framework is especially important in contexts with weak governance and political opportunism copyright 2007 john wiley sons ltd

bargaining piecemeal or all at once perfect information rubinstein style bargaining models are used to explore questions about multiple issue bargaining is it ever sensible to offer on only a subset of the issues being bargained what is the effect of limiting offers so that they must cover all issues we conclude that in realistic settings the answer to the first question is yes and that restricting offers to those covering all issues may be harmful to one or both parties

valuation by conflict abstract nonmarket valuation remains a central issue in ecological and environmental economics this paper examines the properties of an ex post revealed preference approach to value nonmarket goods valuation through observed effort expended in an environmental conflict we consider the strategic interaction between players in a conflict address the implied nash equilibrium and report a benchmark 4x rule as an ex post valuation estimate for a symmetric player conflict we then illustrate the degree of bias that exists once one allows for asymmetries in delegation ability and valuation the benchmark tends to overestimate value if a firm hires a powerful delegate who receives a large contingency fee

from bottom of the barrel to cream of the crop sequential screening with positive selection in a number of interesting environments dynamic screening involves positive selection in contrast with coasian dynamics only the most motivated remain over time the paper provides conditions under which the principal s commitment optimum is time consistent and uses this result to derive testable predictions under permanent or transient shocks it also identifies environments in which time consistency does not hold despite positive selection and yet simple equilibrium characterizations can be obtained

rent shifting and the order of negotiations abstract when two sellers negotiate terms of trade with a common buyer the order in which the negotiations occur can affect the buyer s payoff this suggests that the buyer may have preferences over which seller to negotiate with first we find that when the efficient outcome calls for the buyer to purchase from only one seller the buyer weakly prefers to negotiate first with the inefficient seller and when the efficient outcome calls for the buyer to purchase from both sellers the buyer prefers to negotiate first with the seller that has less bargaining power or offers a smaller stand alone surplus all else being equal these conclusions hold whether or not penalty clauses are feasible

renegotiation and information revelation over time the case of optimal labor contracts the paper analyzes the issue of commitment in grossman and hart s model of optimal labor contracts under asymmetric information about firm profitability we extend their framework by allowing employment to vary over time at equidistant intervals when both parties can precommit ex ante not to renegotiate the contract this replicates the grossman hart outcome each subperiod when precommitment is not possible information revealed through the contract can create pareto improving renegotiation opportunities and the issue of optimal information revelation arises the paper analyzes the impact of ex post pareto improving renegotiations on the optimal contract

multi issue bargaining with endogenous agenda abstract the first part of this paper shows that in a noncooperative bargaining model with alternating offers and time preferences the timing of issues the agenda matters even if players become arbitrarily patient this result raises the question of which agenda should come up endogenously when agents bargain over a set of unrelated issues it is found that simultaneous bargaining over packages should be a prevailing phenomenon but we also point to the possibility of multiple equilibria involving even considerable delay journal of economic literature classification number c78

quality and price personalization under customer recognition a dynamic monopoly model with contrasting equilibria abstract we present a model of market hyper segmentation where a monopolist acquires within a short time all information about the preferences of consumers who purchase its vertically differentiated products the firm offers a new price quality schedule after each commitment period lower consumer types may have an incentive to delay their purchases until next period to obtain a better introductory offer the monopolist counters this incentive by offering higher informational rents considering the dynamic game played by the monopolist and its customers we find that there is always a markov perfect equilibrium mpe in which the firm immediately sells the good to all customers offering the mussa rosen static equilibrium schedule to first time customers and getting full commitment profits however if the commitment period between two offers is long enough there is another mpe with gradual market expansion contrary to the coasian result for a durable good monopoly we find that in both equilibria the profit of the monopolist increases and the aggregate consumers surplus decreases as the interval of commitment shrinks the model yields policy implications for regulations on collection and storage of customers information

monopoly with incomplete information recent theoretical research on principal agent relationships has emphasized incentive problems that arise when the parties involved are constrained by either asymmetric information or their inability to monitor each other s actions here we concentrate on the former constraint and consider the case of a single principal the monopolist the main contribution is to show that under a separability assumption strong conclusions can be drawn about the nature of optimal incentive schemes although the primary focus is on optimal quantity discounts in a monopolized market the results also shed light on related topics such as optimal income taxation and commodity bundling

contract negotiation and the coase conjecture a strategic foundation for renegotiation proof contracts what does contract negotiation look like when some parties hold private information and negotiation frictions are negligible this paper analyzes this question and provides a foundation for renegotiation proof contracts in this environment the model extends the framework of the coase conjecture to situations in which the quantity or quality of the good is endogenously determined and to more general environments in which preferences are nonseparable in the traded goods as frictions become negligible all equilibria converge to a unique outcome which is separating efficient and straightforward to characterize

multilateral bargaining and downstream competition we examine multilateral bargaining in vertical supply relationships that involve an upstream manufacturer who sells through two competing retailers in these relationships the negotiations are interdependent and bargaining externality may arise across the retailers in addition the timing by which the manufacturer negotiates with the retailers becomes important in simultaneous bargaining the retailers negotiate without knowing if an agreement has been reached in the other retail channel whereas in sequential bargaining the retailer in the second negotiation is able to observe whether an agreement was reached in the first negotiation we show that simultaneous bargaining is optimal for the manufacturer when the retail prices and profitability are similar and sequential bargaining is preferred when the dispersion in the retail prices is sufficiently large as a result of ex post renegotiations the manufacturer may strategically stock out the less profitable retailer who charged a relatively low retail price and exclusively supply only the retailer who charged a relatively high retail price and maintained high channel profitability moreover ex post multilateral bargaining can buffer downstream competition and thus lead to positive retail profits even in markets that are close to perfect competition

narrative valuation in a policy judgment context much natural resource policy work stresses the importance of involving lay and expert stakeholders in a dialogue about environmental values pertaining to decisions about land management to this end there is growing interest in value elicitation techniques that a provide alternatives to values expressed as willingness to pay formulas and b do a good job of representing the many social ethical scientific or economic value dimensions of a problem and linking those dimensions to the evaluation of a specific policy toward these objectives this paper explores the technique of narrati6e 6aluation that is the act of situating a valuation and decision problem in the context of a narrated story it reports on an experiment that tested a narrative based representation of a problem against a utilitarian one didactic text to see which representation better served the decision process the relative proficiency of both formats was tested in the context of a policy decision about the impact of hydroelectric power production on a river s salmon population the narrative technique appeared better able to help participants consider relevant value information such that they could apply that information to a complex policy judgment some reasons for the success of the narrative condition are discussed including the technique s capacity for engaging participants and rendering technical information salient the paper closes with some recommendations for further tests of narrative based valuation tools 2000 elsevier science b v all rights reserved

adverse selection and renegotiation in procurement as was shown by dewatripont optimal long term contracts are generally not sequentially optimal the parties ex post renegotiate them to their mutual advantage this paper fully characterizes the equilibrium of a simple two period procurement situation and studies the extent to which renegotiation reduces ex ante welfare i a central result is that like in the non commitment case the second period allocation is optimal for the principal conditionally on his posterior beliefs about the agent ii the first period allocation exhibits an increasing amount of pooling when the discount factor grows iii with a continuum of types it is never optimal to induce full separation the paper also analyzes whether renegotiated long term contracts yield outcomes resembling those under either unnegotiated long term contracts or a sequence of short term contracts and it links the analysis with the multiple unit durable good monopoly problem

contract design and non cooperative renegotiation abstract we study a contract design setting in which the contracting parties cannot commit not to renegotiate previous contract agreements in particular we characterize the outcome functions that are implementable for an uninformed principal and an informed agent if having observed the agent s contract choice the principal can offer a new menu of contracts in its place an outcome function can be implemented in this setting if and only if it is optimal for the principal for some belief over agent types which is more pessimistic in the sense of the likelihood ratio order than the prior furthermore the outcome function cannot be too sensitive to variations in the agent s type we show that the direct revelation mechanism which implements such a function when renegotiation can be prevented will also implement it in any equilibrium when it cannot so the standard contract is robust to renegotiation

the dynamics of incentive contracts the paper studies a simple two period principal agent model in which the principal updates the incentive scheme after observing the agent s first period performance the agent has superior information about his ability the principal offers a first period incentive scheme and observes some measure of the agent s first period performance cost or profit which depends on the agent s ability and unobservable first period effort the relationship is entirely run by short term contracts in the second period the principal updates the incentive scheme and the agent is free to accept the new incentive scheme or to quit the strategies are required to be perfect and updating of the principal s beliefs about the agent s ability follows bayes rule the central theme of the paper is that the ratchet effect leads to much pooling in the first period first for any first period incentive scheme there exists no separating equilibrium second when the uncertainty about the agent s ability is small the optimal scheme must involve a large amount of pooling the paper also gives necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of partition equilibria and looks at the effect of cost uncertainty

the timing of contracting with externalities abstract this paper endogenizes the timing of bilateral contracting between one principal and multiple agents in the presence of externalities contracting simultaneously with all agents is optimal for the principal if externalities become weaker the more an agent trades if instead externalities become stronger sequential negotiations might benefit the principal as they lower the agents outside options under some linearity conditions the principal s preferences with respect to different timings of contracting are opposed to their efficiency ranking

employment with asymmetric information in an economy without informational and other distortions entrepreneurs and workers can write labor contracts that support a pareto optimal allocation of resources this paper is an attempt to characterize contracts when enterpreneurs are better informed about the state of nature than are their workers asymmetric information generally results in a suboptimal allocation of both risk and worker effort in particular if consumption and leisure are perfect substitutes employment will be less than fully pareto optimal in all but the most favorable states of nature

dynamic adverse selection with a patient seller abstract this paper considers dynamic bilateral trade with short term commitment we show that when the seller is more patient than the buyer there exist systematic differences between the optimal selling and renting mechanisms while the former consists of simple price posting the latter induces the buyer to choose between a secure and a random delivery contract allowing for mechanisms more general than price posting reduces the seller s cost of learning the buyer s valuation in the renting case renting leads to more learning than selling but unless the horizon is sufficiently long only when general mechanisms are available our results contrast with the common view that the restriction to price posting is innocuous and that informational asymmetries are more persistent under renting than under selling

bargaining over a menu of wage contracts we investigate an infinite horizon bargaining problem in which a firm and a worker bargain over two dimensions quality and wage the worker has private information about his type only the uninformed firm makes an offer and it can offer a menu of quality wage contracts instead of single one we show that for all discount factors the unique sequential equilibrium outcome is separating without delay the firm separates the types of worker with a menu of contracts in the first period our result shows that in multi dimensional bargaining the coase conjecture holds in the sense that the game ends in the first period but it fails in the sense that the uninformed party can preserve the entire bargaining power

break up fees and bargaining power in sequential contracting abstract when a buyer negotiates in sequence with two potential sellers of a good the outcome of each negotiation depends on all three players bargaining powers assuming all parties are symmetrically informed we find that the first seller s payoff is increasing in his own and the second seller s bargaining power on the other hand the second seller s payoff is decreasing in the first seller s bargaining power and in some cases also in his own bargaining power we characterize when contracts will contain break up fees all results extend to the case of a seller negotiating in sequence with two buyers

contract renegotiation and coasian dynamics consider a long term relationship between a seller and a buyer whose valuation for a per period service or a durable good is private as trade progresses the valuation will be partially revealed and it may be impossible for the parties to commit ex ante not to take advantage of this we analyse this situation first by supposing that the parties can sign a sequence of short term contracts and secondly by supposing that they can sign a long term contract but cannot commit not to renegotiate it later we find a close relationship in the second case between the optimal long term contract and the non commitment outcome in the standard coasian durable good model our results also have implications for hidden information principal agent models

vertical contracting with informational opportunism we consider vertical contracting arrangements between a manufacturer and a retailing network when retailers have private information and the organization is run through bilateral contracts we highlight a new form of informational opportunism arising when the manufacturer manipulates information learned separately in each relationship we characterize the set of allocations robust to such opportunism by means of simple ex post incentive compatibility constraints those constraints limit the manufacturer s ability to use yardstick competition among retailers they simplify contracts and restore a rent efficiency trade off even with correlated information we show that sell out contracts are optimal under a wide range of circumstances

contracting with imperfect commitment and the revelation principle the single agent case this paper extends the revelation principle to environments in which the mechanism designer cannot fully commit to the outcome induced by the mechanism we show that he may optimally use a direct mechanism under which truthful revelation is an optimal strategy for the agent in contrast with the conventional revelation principle however the agent may not use this strategy with probability one our results apply to contracting problems between a principal and a single agent by reducing such problems to well defined programming problems they provide a basic tool for studying imperfect commitment

auctions with limited commitment we study the role of limited commitment in a standard auction environment in each period the seller can commit to an auction with a reserve price but not to future reserve prices we characterize the set of equilibrium profits attainable for the seller as the period length vanishes an immediate sale by efficient auction is optimal when there are at least three buyers for many natural distributions two buyers is enough otherwise we give conditions under which the maximal profit is attained through continuously declining reserve prices

a bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences etude d un jeu de negociation strategique sequentiel avec information incomplete caracterisation d une classe d equilibres sequentiels appeles equilibres sequentiels de negociation et demonstration de l unicite de cet equilibre

endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the ceo author s hermalin benjamin e abstract this paper develops a model in which the effectiveness of a board s monitoring of the ceo depends on the board s independence the independence of new directors is determined through negotiations implicit or explicit between the existing directors and the ceo the ceo s bargaining position and thus influence over the board selection process depends on an updated estimate of the ceo s ability based on prior performance many empirical findings about board structure and performance arise as equilibrium phenomena in this model we also explore the implications of this model for proposed regulations of corporate governance structures please contact the program in law and economics at boalt hall school of law uc berkeley berkeley ca 94720 for a copy of this paper

long term contracting with markovian consumers to study how a firm can capitalize on a long term customer relationship we characterize the optimal contract between a monopolist and a consumer whose preferences follow a markov process the optimal contract is nonstationary and has infinite memory but is described by a simple state variable under general conditions supply converges to the efficient level for any degree of persistence of the types and along any history though convergence is history dependent in contrast as with constant types the optimal contract can be renegotiation proof even with highly persistent types these properties provide insights into the optimal ownership structure of the production technology

on the value of commitment with asymmetric information several recent papers have emphasized that long term relationships can be efficiently governed by short term contracts provided that there is no asymmetric information at the contracting dates this excludes not only adverse selection problems but also moral hazards problems in which hidden actions generate private information over the future in this paper we show in the context of a multiperiod principal agent relationship with adverse selection that renegotiable short term contracts can be as efficient as long term renegotiation proof contracts on the other hand spot contracting may fail to achieve long run efficiency not only because of intertemporal smoothing as with symmetric information but also because of ratchet effects and time inconsistency in the optimal structure of informational rents thus some limited commitment seems to be a necessary and sufficient condition to achieve long run efficiency

opportunism in multilateral vertical contracting nondiscrimination exclusivity and uniformity comment an input supplier selling to competing downstream firms would benefit from publicly committing at the outset to all contracts efficient commitment however would require complete contracts the authors study instead bilateral contracting without commitment regarding others terms each firm then fears that the supplier might opportunistically renegotiate another s contract to increase bilateral profit at the firm s expense the authors show that nondiscrimination clauses generally cannot curb such third party opportunism even with symmetric firms to reassure firms crude forms of commitment may be adopted this could explain the pervasiveness of exclusivity arrangements and the striking uniformity and intertemporal rigidity of franchise contracts copyright 1994 by american economic association

incommensurability and monetary valuation at the very heart of environmental cost benefit analysis cba is the claim that benefits and costs can be expressed in terms of money and hence made comparable in particular cba puts all benefits and costs on a cardinal monetary scale it assumes monetary commensurability a significant literature in ethics and political philosophy has arisen which doubts this assumption but has so far had little impact on the theory or practice of cba in light of this the paper assesses the defense of monetary commensurability offered by cost benefit analysts and the wider economics literature

a contracting perspective on earnings quality abstract this paper analyzes the impact of signal to noise ratios and the autocorrelation of a performance measure on the principal s welfare in dynamic agencies with renegotiation we consider the impact of changes in the persistent transitory and reversible components of accounting earnings on its usefulness in valuation versus contracting increasing the persistent components and reducing the reversible components are generally desirable for valuation but not for contracting eliminating transitory components of earnings is generally desirable for valuation but not necessarily for contracting we discuss the contracting implications of differences in the autocorrelations of accounting earnings versus stock returns

incentives equality and contract renegotiations theory and evidence in the chinese banking industry renegotiation plays an important role in contract theory but the empirical study of renegotiation is almost non existent in the literature using a unique dataset from the chinese banking industry we find that the large majority of managerial incentive contracts are renegotiated after performances are realized we develop a model of contract renegotiation where supervisors and managers sign incentive contracts and then renegotiate them in the unique equilibrium of the model incentive contracts are almost always renegotiated ex post even though renegotiation is fully anticipated incentive contracts affect performance the predictions of the model find strong support from our empirical results

the paradox of growth critique narrative analysis of the finnish sustainable consumption and production debate abstract academic discussion on economic growth and the environment has made a comeback under the auspices of the degrowth debate to date however literature on the topic has been mainly theoretical and empirical studies of actual policy discussions have received less attention this article contributes to the debate with a narrative policy analysis of interviews with members of finland s committee on sustainable consumption and production narrative policy analysis is suitable for complex policy cases by tracing and comparing the different stories non stories and counterstories in the debate the analysis clarifies the issue and paves the way for solutions we found that it is common even among business and ministry representatives to criticize the current growth bound economic system from the perspective of narrative policy analysis however this critique only increases uncertainty and complexity in the policy field which paradoxically leads to a strengthening of the dominant growth stories we suggest that constructing a complete degrowth story is essential for supporting democratic deliberation on sustainability robust institutional support for degrowth work together with research and experimentation are important milestones on the way

dynamic labor contracts under asymmetric information abstract this paper discusses the distortion of employment within a two period asymmetric information contracting model in which an exogenous demand shock is serially correlated and is known only to firms the obtained results show that serial correlations of the state of nature can cause not only underemployment but also overemployment even when overemployment never occurs in the context of a static asymmetric information contracting model

sequentially optimal mechanisms this paper establishes that posting a price in each period is a revenue maximizing allocation mechanism in a finite period model without commitment a risk neutral seller has one object to sell and faces a risk neutral buyer whose valuation is private information and drawn from an arbitrary bounded subset of the real line the seller has all the bargaining power she designs a mechanism to sell the object at t but if trade does not occur at t she can propose another mechanism at t 1 we show that posting a price in each period is an optimal mechanism a methodological contribution of the paper is to develop a procedure to characterize optimal dynamic incentive schemes under non commitment that is valid irrespective of the structure of the agent s type 2006 the review of economic studies limited

valuing environmental policy options a case study comparison of multiattribute and contingent valuation survey methods this paper describes a promising new evaluation approach called a value integration survey that uses the objectives and tradeoffs expressed by participants to value environmental policy options this constructive technique which builds on the interactive elicitation process of decision analysts assists stakeholders in clarifying their values and in agreeing on a policy alternative the paper compares this multi attribute valuation method to contingent valuation surveys describes the sequence of respondents tasks and presents results from a case study comparison of contingent valuation and value integration survey methods in the context of valuing options for fire control in oregon s oldgrowth forests

labor contracts under asymmetric information when workers are free to quit this paper examines the impact of workers ability to quit on the performance of labor contracts between workers and privately informed firms while the need to induce workers to remain with the firm necessarily lowers total welfare the effect on employment levels is to reduce the magnitude of the inefficiency due to asymmetric information whether this inefficiency is under or overemployment the model predicts that employment distortions increase with the strength of lock in effects on workers a prediction which contrasts with the results of efficiency wage models and which may help in empirical testing of labor contract theory

ecosystem service arguments enhance public support for environmental protection but beware of the numbers abstract the trend in the discourse around environmental protection towards arguments based on ecosystem services and monetary valuation has prompted considerable controversy among academics and practitioners concerned with conservation this paper informs the debate by exploring which arguments are most effective in garnering support for environmental protection in a survey based online experiment participants stated their level of dis approval of a large scale hydropower dam project after being presented with various kinds of arguments and information about the environmental impacts the results show that ecosystem service arguments reduced levels of approval of the dam significantly i e they increased support for environmental protection however moral ecological arguments for protecting the environment proved even more effective while a combination of both types of arguments reduced the dam approval ratings the most including a cost benefit analysis cba with monetary valuation of the costs of losing ecosystem services altered dam approval upwards or downwards depending on the outcome of the cba the approval rates of males of older participants and of politically right wing participants were particularly sensitive to the outcomes of monetary valuation more research is needed to understand the short and long term influence of different environmental discourses on peoples judgments and levels of environmental concern