the greenhouse effect damages costs and abatement the buildup of so called greenhouse gases in the atmosphere co2 in particular appears to be having an adverse impact on the global climate this paper briefly reviews current expectations with regard to physical and biological effects their potential costs to society and likely costs of abatement for a worst case scenario it is impossible to assess in economic terms the full range of possible non linear synergistic effects in the most favorable although not necessarily likely case of slow paced climate change however it seems likely that the impacts are within the affordable range at least in the industrialized countries of the world in the third world the notion of affordability is of doubtful relevance making the problem of quantitative evaluation almost impossible we tentatively assess the lower limit of quantifiable climate induced damages at 30 to 35 per ton of co2 equivalent worldwide with the major damages being concentrated in regions most adversely affected by sea level rise the non quantifiable environmental damages are also significant and should by no means be disregarded the costs and benefits of 1 reducing cfc use and 2 reducing fossil fuel consumption as a means of abatement are considered in some detail this strategy has remarkably high indirect benefits in terms of reduced air pollution damage and even direct cost savings to consumers the indirect benefits of reduced air pollution and its associated health and environmental effects from fossil fuel combustion in the industrialized countries range from 20 to 60 per ton of co2 eliminated in addition there is good evidence that modest e g 25 reductions in co2 emissions may be achievable by the u s and by implication for other countries by a combination of increased energy efficiency and restructuring that would permit simultaneous direct economic benefits savings to energy consumers of the order of 50 per ton of co2 saved a higher level of overall emissions reduction possibly approaching 50 could probably be achieved at little or not net cost by taking advantage of these savings we suggest the use of taxes on fossil fuel extraction or a carbon tax as a reasonable way of inducing the structural changes that would be required to achieve significant reduction in energy use and co2 emissions to minimize the economic burden and create a political constituency in support of the approach we suggest the substitution of resource based taxes in general for other types of taxes on labor income real estate or trade that are now the main sources of government revenue while it is conceded that it would be difficult to calculate the optimal tax on extractive resources we do not think this is a necessary prerequisite to policy making in fact we note that the existing tax system has never been optimized according to theoretical principles and is far from optimal by any reasonable criteria

intergenerational equity and sustainability abstract this paper explores the limitations of conventional economic analysis of intergenerational problems and examines some of the alternatives suggested in the literature it is argued that proper consideration of future generations has at least three requirements first when future costs and benefits are considered it should be taken into account that they are to be enjoyed by different generations second the sustainability requirement should be adopted this represents an equity commitment to the future and implies the recognition that future generations have the right to nondeteriorated ecological and economic capacity the paper studies the ways in which the recognition of these rights might be incorporated into economic evaluation and management third an appropriate institutional network to enforce the recognition of these rights in decision making processes should be constituted its design and necessary functions are also analyzed

cost benefit assessment of energy efficiency investments accounting for future resources savings and risks in the australian residential sector this article focuses on the impact of the discount rate on cost benefit assessment of investment options for residential building efficiency an integrated thermal modeling life cycle costing approach is applied to an extensive sample of dominant house designs for australian conditions the relative significance of predicted thermal performance and the applied discount rate on the present value of energy savings from alternative investment scenarios is investigated costs and benefits are also evaluated at the economy wide scale including carbon pricing considerations and for a test case household faced with alternative investment options at the point of construction the influence of the applied discount rate on produced cost benefit calculations is investigated as is the interaction between critical cost benefit input parameters findings support that the discounting framework is the primary driver of difference in estimates about costs and benefits of higher standards of efficiency in the residential sector results demonstrate that agreement on a low discount rate based on sustainability principals would prioritise those projects with significant environmental benefits

discounting in a world of limited growth this paper explores the consequences fordiscounting of assuming limits to growth one of the main determinants of the discount rate is the rate of economic growth if growth rates decline in the future then the discount rate should not be constant but also decline over time in fact we would then need not a single discount rate but rather a variable discount schedule this would imply higher present values for the distant future the paper analyses how discount rates would vary with different assumptions about the patterns of growth and the pure rate of time preference

are optimal emissions really optimal four critical issues for economists in the greenhouse although the greenhouse effect is by many considered as one of the most serious environmental problems several economic studies of the greenhouse effect most notably nordhaus s dice model suggest that it is optimal to allow the emissions of greenhouse gases ghg to increase by a factor of three over the next century other studies have found that substantial reductions can be justified on economic grounds this paper explores into the reasons for these differences and identifies four partly overlapping crucial issues that have to be dealt with when analysing the economics of the greenhouse effect low probability but catastrophic events cost evaluation methods the choice of discount rate the choice of decision criterion the paper shows that i these aspects are crucial for the policy conclusions drawn from models of the economics of climate change and that ii ethical choices have to be made for each of these issues this fact needs wider recognition since economics is very often perceived as a value neutral tool that can be used to provide policy makers with optimal policies

discount rates equity weights and the social cost of carbon abstract equity weighting has been proposed as a way of allowing welfare equivalents to be included in the social cost of carbon since a dollar to a poor person is worth more than a dollar to a rich one here we use the page2002 integrated assessment model to show that the social cost of carbon is higher without equity weights an elasticity of marginal utility with respect to income of 0 than with them this might seem counter intuitive but it comes about because of the logical link between equity weights and discount rates as the elasticity goes from 0 to 0 5 to 1 0 the social rate of time preference rises and the drop in present values that results far outweighs the small increase in impacts that equity weights bring

how much damage will climate change do recent estimates two reasons to be concerned about climate change are its unjust distributional impact and its negative aggregate effect on economic growth and welfare although our knowledge of the impact of climate change is incomplete and uncertain economic valuation is difficult and controversial and the effect of other developments on the impacts of climate change is largely speculative the authors find that poorer countries and people are more vulnerable than are richer countries and people a modest global warming is likely to have a net negative effect on poor countries in hot climates but may have a net positive effect on rich countries in temperate climates if one counts dollars the world aggregate may be positive if one counts people the world aggregate is probably negative negative impacts would become more negative and positive impacts would turn negative for more substantial warming the marginal costs of carbon dioxide emissions are uncertain and sensitive to assumptions that partially reflect ethical positions but are unlikely to be larger than 50 per tonne carbon

development lessons from asia the role of government in south korea and taiwan south korea and taiwan share common structural characteristics and export led industrialization several studies have documented an active role of government beyond correcting market failures h pack and w e westphal 1986 paul kuznets 1988 but the role of government differs the taiwan government has been supportive rather than interventionist whereas the korean government has been collaborative and even coercive in relations with the private sector government in both countries helped launch and sustain the export led strategy taking into consideration the initial conditions in industrial organization and structure capital markets and trade although the strategy contributed to export development once put in place the respective governments have been unwilling and unable to adjust their role to changing circumstances this rigidity accounts for the inefficiency of government in korea in the 1970s and in taiwan in the 1980s

welfare specifications and optimal control of climate change an application of fund the sensitivity of the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions to the specification of the social welfare function is systematically explored using the fund model increasing risk aversion emphasises climate change damages relative to emission reduction costs but at the same time increases the discount rate of consumption without international co operation the discount rate effect dominates so that optimal control decreases with increasing risk aversion with international co operation optimal control first increases then decreases with increasing risk aversion since climate change falls heaviest on the poor optimal control increases with increasing inequity aversion full fledged intergenerational welfare functions on the one hand emphasise climate change damages but on the other hand place more weight on current poorer generations in fund the two tendencies almost cancel

reconciling sustainability and discounting in cost benefit analysis a methodological proposal abstract the incorporation of the intergenerational equity objective has rendered the traditional cost benefit analysis cba approach obsolete for the evaluation of projects presenting an important number of environmental externalities and for those whose impacts extend throughout a long period of time based on the assumption that applying a discount rate rewards current consumption and therefore that it is only possible to introduce a certain intergenerational equity in a cost benefit analysis in this work we propose an approach to discounting based on a different rationale for tangible and intangible effects we designed two indicators of environmental profitability a the intergenerational transfer amount ita which quantifies in monetary units what the current generation is willing to pass on future generations when an environmental restoration project is carried out and b the critical environmental rate cer measures the implicit environmental profitability these concepts were tested through an empirical case study pertaining to the assessment of an erosion control project in the southeast of spain the results yield traditional profitability indicators that are higher and probably closer to the real values set by the contemporary society the information provided by the environmental profitability indicators proposed renders more transparency to the quantification of the levels of intergenerational equity applied thereby facilitating the difficult reconciliation of the cba technique with the objective of sustainability

double co2 and beyond benefits costs and compensation abstract economic decisions over what action if any to take concerning the greenhouse effect tend to revolve around the social discount rate implicitly the debate concerns how to attribute intertemporal weights to welfare and implies a moral stance that is rarely given explicit recognition refocusing on the outcomes of current actions emphasises the role of compensation a conflict is apparent between the view that the current generation need be unconcerned over the loss or injury caused to future generations because they will benefit from advances in technology investments in both man made and natural capital and direct bequests and the requirement to avoid harming the innocent changes in units of welfare cannot be viewed as equivalent regardless of their direction in general doing harm is not cancelled out by doing good the result is a rejection of the potential compensation principle which underlies the current economic stance and a reconsideration of the acceptability of compensation altogether the concept of human rights and a non utilitarian perspective are used to show how cost benefit analysis denies the existence of inalienable rights and economics limits the moral considerability of harm

are the economic costs of stabilising the atmosphere prohibitive abstract macro economic studies of the costs of reducing co2 emissions generally estimate the global cost of stabilising the atmospheric concentrations of co2 in the range 350 550 ppm in trillions of usd this creates the impression that the cost of co2 reductions is so large that it threatens economic development but presented in another way a completely different picture emerges there is widespread agreement amongst the more pessimistic macro economic studies that stringent carbon controls are compatible with a significant increase in global and regional economic welfare even if the cost of co2 abatement rises to 5 of global income per year by the end of this century this reduction is minor compared with the tenfold increase in global income that is expected since income is assumed to grow by a couple of percent per year the trillion usd cost could also be expressed as a few years delay in achieving an order of magnitude higher income levels similar observations can also be made as regards near term abatement targets such as the kyoto protocol a more widespread recognition of the fact that carbon abatement policies will only marginally affect economic growth is likely to increase the willingness to introduce carbon abatement policies

rethinking the costs related to global warming a survey of the issues one approach to the economic analysis of global warming seeks to balance the costs of damage from or adaptation to it with the costs of mitigating it the costs of adaptation and damage have been estimated using techniques of environmental evaluation but are subject to a wide margin of uncertainty the costs of mitigation principally by reducing the emissions of co2 have been estimated using different kinds of economic models some of the results of which have suggested that very little abatement of carbon emissions is justified before the costs of abatement exceed the benefits of it in terms of foregone damage and adaptation costs the paper analyses the extent to which this conclusion is a function of the modelling assumptions and techniques used rather than likely practical outcomes with regard to the models treatment of unemployed resources revenue recycling prior distortions in the economy due to the tax system and possible dynamic effects from the introduction of a carbon energy tax it concludes that with different and arguably more appropriate treatment of the above issues especially when the secondary benefits of reducing co2 emissions are also taken into account it is not clear that even substantial reductions in the use of fossil fuels will incur net costs especially if there is the prospect of even moderate costs from global warming

valuing lives equally distributional weights for welfare analysis abstract distributional weights for welfare analysis are proposed based on two axioms 1 all lives are equally valued 2 the monetary value of a person s life is her own valuation this implies weights proportional to the reciprocals of the values of statistical lives

global warming discounting is not the issue but substitutability is the cost benefit study of nordhaus 1994 is representative for the neoclassical approach towards global warming nordhaus found that no substantial emission cuts are warranted most of his critics have concentrated on the issue of discounting and demanded that a lower discount rate should be applied these criticisms first miss the point and second lead to ethically dubious inconsistent conclusions and inefficient policy choices they miss the point because the real problem of nordhaus s methodology is his implicit underlying assumption of perfect substitutability between natural and other forms of capital given the validity of this assumption lowering the rate of discount is inconsistent with current savings behaviour is ethically dubious because future generations will be much richer than the current one anyway and is inefficient because scarce financial resources are channelled into emissions abatement that exhibits rates of return far inferior to alternative public investments any call for aggressive emission abatement must therefore directly attack the perfect substitutability assumption of neoclassical economics the real disagreement is about whether consumption growth can compensate for environmental degradation caused by global warming discounting is not the issue but substitutability is

time preference in global warming calculations a proposal for a unified index abstract many aspects of the calculation of the impacts of greenhouse gas ghg emissions and the costs and benefits of possible response options are highly sensitive to the way in which time preference is incorporated into the computations the intergovernmental panel on climate change ipcc used global warming potentials gwps to standardize inputs of different gases with differing radiative forcings and atmospheric lifetimes in the results emphasized by the ipcc s second assessment report a 100 year time horizon and no discounting is used and this has been adopted by the kyoto protocol for use in the first commitment period 2008 2012 here an alternative unified index is proposed that assigns explicit weights to the interests of different generations in contrast to discounting including the zero discount rate used by the ipcc the generationally weighted index forces policy makers to face the moral assumptions that underlie their choices related to global warming

discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming the economics of global warming is reviewed with special emphasis on how the cost depends on the discount rate and on how costs in poor and rich regions are aggregated into a global cost estimate both of these factors depend on the assumptions made concerning the underlying utility and welfare functions it is common to aggregate welfare gains and losses across generations and countries as if the utility of money were constant but it is not if we assume that a e co2 equivalent dlubling implies costs equal to 1 5 of the income in both high and low income countries a pure rate of time preference equal to zero and a utility function which is logarithmic in income then the marginal cost of co2 emissions is estimated at 260 590 usd ton c for a time horizon in the range 300 1000 years an estimate which is large enough to justify significant reductions of co2 emissions on purely economic grounds the estimate is approximately 50 100 times larger than the estimate made by nordhaus in his dice model and the difference is almost completely due to the choice of discount rate and the weight given to the costs in the developing world as well as a more accurate model of the carbon cycle finally the sensitivity of the marginal cost estimate with respect to several parameters is analyzed

optimal climate policy is a utopia from quantitative to qualitative cost benefit analysis abstract the dominance of quantitative cost benefit analysis cba and optimality concepts in the economic analysis of climate policy is criticised among others it is argued to be based in a misplaced interpretation of policy for a complex climate economy system as being analogous to individual inter temporal welfare optimisation the transfer of quantitative cba and optimality concepts reflects an overly ambitious approach that does more harm than good an alternative approach is to focus the attention on extreme events structural change and complexity it is argued that a qualitative rather than a quantitative cba that takes account of these aspects can support the adoption of a minimax regret approach or precautionary principle in climate policy this means implement stringent ghg reduction policies as soon as possible

the social cost of carbon and its policy implications the shadow price or social cost of carbon is an important indicator of the global incremental damage done by emitting greenhouse gases today cost benefit analysis would set the optimal amount of greenhouse gas emission reduction at the point where this social cost just equals the incremental cost of controlling emissions the higher the value for the social cost of carbon the more control is warranted this comparison assumes that cost benefit analysis is the correct way of determining climate change policy and many believe this is not the case because of the very long term irreversible and potentially catastrophic nature of global warming but in the short run at least a comparison of cost and benefits is required and in any event all decisions imply costs and benefits but what is the right figure for the social cost of carbon this paper reviews the uk government s assessment of the cost and concludes that it has been set far too high because of a misreading of the integrated assessment models used to balance costs and benefits moreover adoption of the uk government s shadow price would have formidable implications for energy policy in the uk and for policies on afforestation copyright 2003 oxford university press

disaggregated economic impact analysis incorporating ecological and social trade offs and techno institutional context a case from the western ghats of india economic valuation of ecosystem benefits and their aggregation in a benefit cost analysis bca framework is the norm in mainstream environmental economics but valuation and bca have also attracted criticisms internal criticisms point to the absence of alternative scenarios in valuation overlooking of ecological trade offs and dis services and inattention to context others criticize aggregation across diverse stakeholders and the problem of non monetizable benefits and dismiss bca as fatally flawed they suggest approaches such as deliberative decision making and multi criteria analysis we propose a middle path that uses the strengths of economic analysis for decision support while avoiding the pitfalls we disaggregate economic impacts by stakeholder groups link ecosystem changes to benefits as well as dis benefits and examine how socio technological context shapes the magnitude of economic impact we illustrate this approach by studying the impact of creating the biligiri rangaswamy temple wildlife sanctuary in the western ghats forests of southern india our analysis shows that while some stakeholders are net beneficiaries others are net losers changes in forest rights irrigation technologies and ecosystem dynamics influence the magnitude of benefits and sometimes convert gainers into losers such disaggregated analysis can provide useful information for deliberative decision making and important academic insights on how economic value is generated

intergenerational discounting with intragenerational inequality in consumption and the environment it is now established that the consumption discount rate is determined by the growth of consumption multiplied by the elasticity of marginal utility but distributive concerns are rarely reflected in the literature assuming a social welfare function with inequality aversion we consider a consumption discount rate that can be decomposed into the growth effect and the intragenerational distribution effect the framework is then extended to include population change and inequality in the environment as an amenity in a utility with constant elasticity of substitution numerical examples illustrate that distributional effects turn non negligibly negative that may reduce consumption discount rate by 1 3 for plausible parameters once distribution is adjusted for both population and the environment

the greenhouse effect and intergenerational transfer abstract the scientific basis for understanding the economic issues involved in the greenhouse effect is outlined four important aspects of the problem are identified and discussed irreversibility international and institutional constraints uncertainty and intergenerational equity attention is focused upon the intertemporal choice problem a model describing the potential for intergenerational transfers under the uncertainty of climatic change due to fossil fuel combustion is presented we conclude intergenerational compensation can be achieved by investment in capital or technology or by bequest and is ethically required regardless of any other action

the effects of ageing and an environmental trust fund in an overlapping generations model on carbon emission reductions most currently employed integrated assessment models for climate change are of a dynastic nature they employ the ramsey rule linking the interest rate economic growth and the rate of pure time preference this paper argues that although a dynastic framework might be convenient for economic analysis it is restrictive and can be misleading overlapping generations models which do not employ the ramsey rule are more flexible and may give results different from those derived from dynastic models with the integrated assessment model alice 2 0 it is shown how various assumptions on demographic change and public institutions can affect the interest rate thereby influencing the efficient greenhouse gas emission reductions it is concluded that dynastic integrated assessment models are in many respects inappropriate for providing policy makers with quantitative figures about the costs of carbon dioxide emissions and their desirable reduction levels 2001 elsevier science b v all rights reserved

ethics and the limits of environmental economics abstract the purpose of this paper is to establish the limits of the cost benefit framework used by environmental economists given the acceptance of an ethic of environmental concern two approaches to environmental ethics will be considered one based on the view that human beings are the focus of moral concern and another based on the notion that moral concern can be extended to the non human natural world as well if human beings are morally considerable cost benefit analysis can be legitimately applied to environmental issues involving the pursuit of human well being so long as those who suffer losses from environmental damage are adequately compensated however the application of cost benefit analysis to environmental issues is inconsistent with the moral considerability of human beings in cases where environmental damage is harmful to human health and in cases where the natural environment is so highly valued that the compensation of damaged parties is infeasible moreover cost benefit analysis cannot be legitimately applied where non human natural entities are viewed as morally considerable

on international equity weights and national decision making on climate change abstract estimates of the marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions require the aggregation of monetised impacts of climate change over people with different incomes and in different jurisdictions implicitly or explicitly such estimates assume a social welfare function and hence a particular attitude towards equity and justice we show that previous approaches to equity weighting are inappropriate from a national decision maker s point of view because domestic impacts are not valued at domestic values we propose four alternatives sovereignty altruism good neighbour and compensation with different views on concern for and liability towards foreigners the four alternatives imply radically different estimates of the social cost of carbon and hence the optimal intensity of climate policy

the behavioural economics of climate change this paper attempts to bring some central insights from behavioural economics into the economics of climate change in particular it discusses i implications of prospect theory the equity premium puzzle and time inconsistent preferences in the choice of discount rate used in climate change cost assessments and ii the implications of various kinds of social preferences for the outcome of climate negotiations several reasons are presented for why it appears advisable to choose a substantially lower social discount rate than the average return on investments it also seems likely that taking social preferences into account increases the possibilities of obtaining international agreements compared to the standard model however there are also effects going in the opposite direction and the importance of sanctions is emphasized

weight factors in cost benefit analysis of climate change equity considerations may justify the use of weight factors when estimating the costs of climate change this paper reviews different weight factors that have been used in the climate economics literature based on a simple model it is shown that although the different weight factors imply substantially different cost damage estimates they actually yield the same optimal emission reductions this paradox is explained by the fact that some of the approaches require that also the abatement costs are weighted and this offsets the effect of the diverging cost damage estimates the model is then used to analyse the importance weighting may have on the overall cost benefit analysis at present when most of the global emissions of fossil co2 originate from the industrialised countries the global optimal emissions are considerably lower if costs are weighted however the more the emissions in developing countries grow the less important becomes the introduction of weight factors in cost benefit analysis of climate change for the global emission reductions in the model developed here on a regional level the introduction of weight factors continues to play an important role implying substantially lower emissions in the rich region and slightly higher in the poor

a regulatory framework for a policy of sustainability lessons from the neo liberal school abstract in this paper targets institutions and policy measures for describing and implementing sustainable development are evaluated in terms of their conformity with the economic framework of a market system from the viewpoint of neo liberal economic thinking as conceived by the german freiburg school of economists a general set of criteria is developed it includes issues of operationalization and legitimation of goals as well as institutional and instrumental issues on this basis general rules for designing an ecological framework guaranteeing the greatest possible degree of conformity with a market system are derived the concrete application of these rules leads to recommendations for a policy of sustainability with respect to the setting of goals the establishment of institutions as well as the use of appropriate instruments

targets for global climate policy an overview a survey of the economic impact of climate change and the marginal damage costs shows that carbon dioxide emissions are a negative externality the estimated pigou tax and its growth rate are too low to justify the climate policy targets set by political leaders a lower discount rate or greater concern for the global distribution of income would justify more stringent climate policy but would imply an overhaul of other public policies catastrophic risk justifies more stringent climate policy but only to a limited extent

intergenerational equity discounting and the role of cost benefit analysis in evaluating global climate policy when public policies with impacts far into the future are being debated the question inevitably is raised whether cost benefit analysis which discounts future costs and benefits is not biased against future generations and whether if such discounting is appropriate at all a lower rate should be used to avoid such bias the debate on global climate change is no exception this paper sketches and analyses the welfare foundations of cost benefit analysis and from this perspective analyses the role of cost benefit analysis in the climate policy debate particularly with reference to intergenerational effects the paper concludes that the cost benefit criterion cannot provide a definitive basis for deciding whether we should commit to a longer term programme to moderate climate change the issues of intergenerational equity are not that global climate change will significantly lower the gnp of future generations but relate to the possibility of science fiction like changes in the planet that will produce catastrophic effects in the future and the typical way in which the cost benefit problem is posed obscures the basic choices that we should be evaluating

on the value of life in rich and poor countries and distributional weights beyond utilitarianism this paper discusses the use ofdistributional weights in cba based on a generalbergson samuelson swf in particular it illustratessome consequences of applying a swf characterized byconstant inequality aversion which includes classicalutilitarianism as a special case together with aconstant relative risk aversion utility function whencalculating the damage costs of global warming itextends and clarifies earlier unintuitive results andemphasizes that utility must be seen as fully cardinalin terms of levels in this context in the specialcase of utilitarianism on the other hand it issufficient to be able to make interpersonalcomparisons of utility changes

the impact of climate change on the balanced growth equivalent an application of fund the stern review added balanced growth equivalents bge to the economic climate change research agenda we first propose rigorous definitions of the bge for multiple regions and under uncertainty we show that the change in the bge is independent of the assumed scenario of per capita income for comparable welfare economic assumptions as the stern review we calculate lower changes in bge between a business as usual scenario and one without climate impacts with the model fund than the stern review found with the model page we find that mitigation policies give even lower changes in bge and argue that those policy choices should be the focus of the research effort rather than total damage estimates according to our results the current carbon tax should be below 55 tc sensitivity analyses show that the stern review chose parameters that imply high impact estimates however for regionally disaggregated welfare functions we find changes in bge that are significantly higher than the results from the stern review both for total damage as for policy analysis with regional disaggregation and high risk aversion we observe fat tails and with that very high welfare losses

the damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations it is argued that estimating the damage costs of a certain benchmark climate change is not sufficient what is needed are cost functions and confidence intervals although these are contained in the integrated models and their technical manuals this paper brings them into the open in order to stimulate discussion after briefly reviewing the benchmark climate change damage costs region specific cost functions are presented which distinguish tangible from intangible losses and the losses due to a changing climate from those due to a changed climate furthermore cost functions are assumed to be quadratic as an approximation of the unknown but presumably convex functions results from the damage module of the integrated climate economy model fund are presented next uncertainties are incorporated and expected damages are calculated it is shown that because of convex loss functions and right skewed uncertain ties the risk premium is substantial calling for more action than analysis based on best guess estimates the final section explores some needs for further scientific research

environmental sustainability as the first principle of distributive justice towards an ecological communitarian normative foundation for ecological economics abstract the ecological economic concern with environmental sustainability embodies the normative orientations of the field this concern is foremost a matter of distributive justice the definition of which determines the relevance of the appropriate scale and efficient allocation criteria yet it would appear that the discipline lacks a shared internally consistent set of ethical premises by which this concern might be legitimized various authors have embraced a rawlsian conception of liberal justice as the appropriate banner for ecological economics in place of the consequentialist libertarian foundations of neoclassical economics including environmental economics it is argued here that this is insufficient in so far as it is premised on a vision of a discrete self sufficient economic actor instead it is posited that an ecological economic ethic must proceed from an understanding of the economic actor as community member a recognition implicit in recent ecological economic contributions focused on discourse ethics and deliberative democracy an ecological communitarian conception of distributive justice which views the well being of the individual as inseparable from the integrity of its implicate mutually constituting human and non human natural communities is advanced as the appropriate basis for the ecological economic world view in this light the thermodynamic foundations of ecological economics are seen to provide the necessary departure point for normative decision making oriented towards ensuring sustainability in economic organization