two stage group rent seeking with negatively interdependent preferences the purpose of this paper is to compare the rate of rent dissipation in a group rent seeking contest in which rent seeking activities take place in two stages with those of a one stage individual contest specifically the effect of the extension by introducing rent seekers with negatively interdependent preferences is analyzed focusing on the relationship between contest structure and preference type we find that rent dissipation given absolute as opposed to relative payoff maximization is lower in a two stage contest than in a one stage contest given players with negatively interdependent preferences we find the reverse

a model of military spending and economic growth this paper investigates a model of militaryconflict between two regimes in which eachmay initiate combat in order to confiscateresources from the other conflict or thepotential for same results in wastefulmilitary spending which lowers growth foreach regime equilibrium military spendingis determined in a one shot game analysisof the one shot game is followed by a studyof the prospects for an equilibrium inwhich regimes lower military spending anddo not engage in combat in repeated play in this latter case military spending willbe decreased to a level just sufficient todeter deviations from the no combatequilibrium this minimum level increases and growth decreases with the internalpolitical instability of each regime moreover an exogenous increase in thedefensive capability of each regime mayeither increase or decrease growth depending upon the initial level ofmilitary spending and growth

election goals and the allocation of campaign resources this paper compares the equilibrium behavior and outcomes in a model of two party competition for legislative seats under two different assumptions about the parties goals 1 parties maximize the expected number of seats won and 2 parties maximize the probability of winning a majority of the seats the two goals may lead to qualitatively different behavior and studying the differences yields insights into the relationship between the goals and the role of assymetries between the parties

creating balance in dynamic competitions abstract we consider incentives for organizing competitions in multiple rounds focusing on situations where there is heterogeneity among the contestants ex ante which discourages effort in a single contest heterogeneity evolves across rounds depending upon the outcomes of previous rounds we present conditions under which balance in such a competition can be created by determining the number of rounds and dividing the prize fund carefully across them so that full rent dissipation entails in the model each round is an all pay auction where contestants differ in their abilities to gain a momentum from winning we also discuss the case when negative prizes are feasible demonstrating that this strengthens the full dissipation result and we consider a case where the size of the winner s momentum is related to the size of the prize attained showing that the stronger this linkage the less of the prize is awarded early on

racing with uncertainty and strategic interaction between competitors as the race unfolds most of the existing literature examines one or other of these features but not the two combined our aim is to see how the efforts of competitors in a race vary with the intensity of rivalry between them in our principal model whch is of a one dimensional race it is shown that the leader in the race makes greater efforts than the follower and efforts increase as the gap between competitors decreases under certain conditions the same results hold in our second related model which is of a two dimensional race

two stage rent seeking contests with carryovers we examine a two stage contest in which players in twogroups compete noncooperatively to win a rent in thefirst stage each group selects a finalist the twofinalists compete for the rent in the second stage first stage efforts are carried over to the secondstage in the sense that they are partly effective inthe second stage as well we show the following inthe case of player specific carryovers therent dissipation rate increases in the carryover rate with the carryover rate equal to one the rent isfully dissipated in the case of group specificcarryovers however the rent dissipation rate isindependent of the carryover rate

primaries and the new hampshire effect candidates for u s presidential elections are determined through sequential elections in single states the primaries we develop a model in which candidates can influence their winning probability in electoral districts by spending money on campaigning the equilibrium replicates several stylized facts very well campaigning is very intensive in the first district the outcome of the first election then creates an asymmetry in the candidates incentives to campaign in the next district which endogenously increases the equilibrium probability that the first winner wins in further districts on the normative side our model oers a possible explanation for the sequential organization it leads in expectation to a lower level of advertising expenditures than simultaneous elections moreover if one of the candidates is the more eective campaigner sequential elections also perform better with regard to the selection of the best candidate

reputation and imperfect information abstract a common observation in the informal literature of economics and elsewhere is that is multistage games players may seek early in the game to acquire a reputation for being tough or benevolent or something else but this phenomenon is not observed in some formal game theoretic analyses of finite games such as selten s finitely repeated chain store game or in the finitely repeated prisoners dilemma we reexamine selten s model adding to it a small amount of imperfect or incomplete information about players payoffs and we find that this addition is sufficient to give rise to the reputation effect that one intuitively expects

dissipation of contestable rents by small numbers of contenders the theory of rent seeking with its origins in the observations of gordon tullock 1967 or to use jagdish bhagwati s 1982 proposed term the theory of directly unproductive profit seeking activities is concerned with the potentially adverse effects on resource allocation of incentives to cap ture and defend artificially contrived rents and transfers the scope for so cial loss proposed by the theory derives from the relation between the value of a contestable prize and the value of the resources attracted into the con test to determine the beneficiary of the prize underlying this social loss is a specification of how rational behavior by optimizing agents links the value of the prize sought to the resources expended it has been traditional to assume competitive behavior in describing the activities of lobbying and influence seeking then if some further condi tions are satisfied l the total value of the resources expended precisely equals the value of the prize sought so dissipation is complete 2 conse quently the social cost associated with contestability of a rent can be in ferred from the value of the rent itself and the detailed and hard to come by information on individual outlays made in the course of the contest be comes unnecessary by basing their analyses on competitive dissipation contributors to the rent seeking literature see the review by robert tollison 1982 have been able to presume that the observed value of a contested rent is an exact measure of the associated social cost of monopoly power or regu lation similarly in the trade theoretic literature where the rights contested are to quota premia or revenues from trade taxes krueger 1974 bhagwati

free entry and efficient rent seeking this paper concerns rent seeking and the extent to which rents are dissipated under various circumstances gordon tullock s 1967 insight that expenditures made to capture an artificially created transfer represent a social waste suggested that the cost to the economy of monopoly and regulation is greater than the simple harberger 1954 deadweight loss indeed under tullock s original formulation and in the extensions of his work by krueger 1974 and posner 1975 rents are exactly dissipated at the social level 1 is spent to capture 1 so that the total welfare loss from such activities is equal to the harberger triangle plus the rectangle of monopoly profits

arming as a strategic investment in a cooperative equilibrium to develop a positive economic theory of military spending this analysis focuses on a game theoretic general equilibrium model of international conflict in which consumption peaceful investment and military spending are endogenously determined the analysis illustrates that when there is repeated interaction between nations a game of threats and punishments generally will not support a disarmament outcome and that fluctuations in military spending can be an endogenous result of fluctuations in aggregate economic activity furthermore the analysis shows how the relation between aggregate economic activity and military spending qualitatively depends on whether governments are acting opportunistically or cooperatively copyright 1990 by american economic association

a model of rivalries with endogenous prize and strength abstract this paper extends bevia and corchon 2013 to a model with both endogenous contestable prize and endogenous relative strength such a setting is ideal for the study of intra organizational rivalries commonly observed in family sports promotion and duopoly we find that when the game starts with asymmetric players the weaker player exerts more effort than the stronger player as a result the weaker player partially overcomes the disadvantage of being weak in this setting neither domino nor avalanche effect exists

endogenous destruction in conflict theory and extensions this article develops a general equilibrium model of conflict to characterize the implications of endogenous destruction for bargaining and fighting specifically we consider the scenario where two contending parties engage in bargaining to avoid fighting when there are direct costs e g arms buildups and indirect costs e g destruction to consumable resources of conflict without imposing specific functional form restrictions on conflict production and destruction technologies we show their interactions in determining an optimal decision between fighting and bargaining we find that under the shadow of conflict bargaining is costly as the contending parties always allocate more resources to arming for guarding settlement through bargaining than in the event of fighting in contrast to conventional thinking that bargaining is pareto superior over fighting we show conditions under which fighting dominates bargaining as the nash equilibrium choice the positive analysis may help explain the general causes of fighting without resorting to the assumption of incomplete information or misperceptions jel d74 h56 c7

rent seeking and entry abstract it is the purpose of this paper to develop a market equilibrium model of rent seeking with entry the model determines the optimal amount of rent seeking activities by individuals the equilibrium number of rent seekers and hence also the total amount of rent seeking in the industry

crime confiscation and frowth for and against leviathan this paper presents a dynamic general equilibrium model ofrent seeking in which the payoffs and the choices between productiveand non productive activity are endogenous the economy has the potential for endogenous growth but when agents can choose between confiscation and productive investment growth is no longer possible

tests of competing theories of consumer choice and the representative consumer hypothesis tests of competing theories of consumer choice and the representative consumer hypothesis in this paper the authors estimate demand functions for individual agents they test if commonly used functions are consisten t with the data and if parameters are the same across subjects the y examine decision rules based on random choice psychological and bi ological models of choice and utility functions commonly employed in the economics literature a generalized minimum needs hypothesis per forms well across experimental conditions and individual subjects st atistically significant differences in tastes across subjects were id entified in the data copyright 1987 by royal economic society

asymmetric two stage group rent seeking comparison of two contest structures two variations of a two stage rent seeking contest areconsidered in the first stage of the between groupmodel groups compete through the expenditure of resources bytheir members based on group expenditures one winning groupis probabilistically determined on the second stage membersof the winning group compete with one another for an exogenousprize in the semi finals model a player is chosen fromeach group and then these players compete for the prize groups differ in size or in their valuation of the prize subgame perfect equilibrium solutions are constructed forthese two contest structures

on industry life cycles delay entry and shakeout in beer brewing abstract this paper proposes a new explanation for industry shakeout an event evident in the life cycle of many industries in which the number of firms drops significantly in a short interval of time based on an in depth analysis of the shakeout in the united states beer brewing industry between 1880 and 1890 we propose that industry shakeouts naturally follow periods of mass entry by firms similar patterns are evident in two other industries we briefly examine the us automobile and tire industries while entry rates fluctuate broadly in all these industries we find that the timing of exit for a given cohort of entrants is remarkably similar over time the exit hazard rate is peaked in the first two years of every cohort s life and drops dramatically to low and stable levels for subsequent ages in this sense mass exit follows mass entry and does not require a deep explanation it is the mass entry evident in the data for these industries that requires an explanation we propose a theoretical model of information accumulation to explain entry into an industry entrepreneurs are uncertain about the profitability of the industry and this uncertainty is resolved through sufficient accumulation of information regarding the fortunes of incumbent firms delay in entry occurs solely due to the fact that it takes time to accumulate sufficient information to support more entry the resulting entry pattern from simulations of the model looks much like that observed in the industries we study

dynamic multi activity contests in many contests players can influence the outcome through efforts in multiple activities several of which can be chosen before others in this paper we develop a model of dynamic multi activity contests players simultaneously choose efforts in long run activities observe each other s efforts in these activities and then simultaneously choose efforts in short run activities a player s long run and short run efforts complement each other in determining the player s probability of winning we compare the outcomes of this two stage model to those of the corresponding model in which players do not observe each other s first stage efforts before the second stage and thus effectively choose efforts in all activities simultaneously interestingly effort expenditures are always lower in the sequential multi activity contest than in the simultaneous multi activity contest the implications of this result for the organization of military litigation innovation academic and sporting contests are highlighted

endogenous sharing rules in collective group rent seeking this paper examines the possibility of endogenous determination of intra group sharing rules in a collective group rent seeking game collective group rent seeking is considered as a two stage nash cournot game in which sharing rules are determined prior to individual decision on voluntary contribution the solution is subgame perfect and is obtained by backward induction in competition between two groups of the same size the nash equilibrium sharing rule of each group is to distribute rent to each according to relative effort total rent seeking outlays in this case are equal to those obtained by tullock 1980 when more than two groups compete for a rent the sharing rule based on relative effort is again likely to be the nash equilibrium strategy of each group the amount of total rent seeking outlays is also equal to that in tullock 1980 in a nutshell the rent is substantially dissipated if sharing rules are endogenously determined

recent advances in oligopoly theory from a game theory perspective abstract this paper surveys the contribution that recent developments in game theory have made to the understanding of oligopoly theory it is argued that conventional models suffer from the problem that there are a number of solution concepts offered with little guidance as to which should be selected and this is related to the static nature of the models employed one important development in game theory has been the analysis of repeated games and when applied to oligopoly theory this suggests that outcomes may be more cooperative than conventional theory suggests related to this is the requirement that firms employ credible threats to punish cheating from cooperative outcomes and the paper examines the extent to which imperfect information may restrict the scope of firms to employ such punishments one way in which firms may seek to make threats credible is through strategic investments for example in production capacity and the paper explores how competition over price or output is integrated with competition over instruments for strategic investment

endogenous strength in conflicts in this paper we study a two period contest where the strength of players in the second period depends on the result of the contest in the first stage we show that in contrast to one shot contests in the same setting heterogeneous players exert different efforts in the first stage and rent dissipation in the first period may be large we study the conditions under which the discouragement effect holds in addition new issues emerge like the evolution of the strengths and the shares of the prize during the game

collective rent dissipation the theory of rent seeking was initiated by tullock 1967 1980 followed by krueger 1974 and posner 1975 and more recently extended in various directions by allard 1988 appelbaum and katz 1986a b c gradstein and nitzan 1989 hillman and katz 1984 1987 hillman and samet 1987 hillman and riley 1989 katz et al 1990 long and vousden 1987 ursprung 1990 and varian 1989 the purpose of this paper is to extend this theory by introducing the possibility of collective group rent seeking with voluntary individual decisions regarding their extent of participation in the collective rent seeking efforts

symmetric two stage contests with budget constraints the impact of a budget constraint on individual expenditures is examined in two models of two stage contests with homogenous and risk neutral players competing to win a single indivisible commonly valued rent the set of players is partitioned into equally sized groups in the first model one contestant from each group survives to compete on the second stage against the other survivors in the second model one group survives the first stage and its members compete against each other on the second stage we derive and discuss the symmetric subgame perfect equilibrium solution for each model

capital as a commitment strategic investment to deter mobility abstract this paper analyzes how an early entrant in a market can exploit its head start by strategic investment the analysis is based on spence s paper investment strategy and growth in a new market bell j econ 10 1979 1 19 we frist study the investment game in the no discounting case which embodies the key features of mobility deterrence we establish the existence of a set of perfect equilibria and suggest that one particular equilibrium is most reasonable this equilibrium also valid with discounting involves the follower firm being forever deterred from investing to its steady state reaction curve in contrast to spence s proposed solution

a theory of exit in duopoly we develop a duopoly model in which exit occurs because of the existence of fixed costs or opportunity costs each firm enters the market knowing its own cost but not that of its opponent as times goes on each firm becomes increasingly pessimistic about the cost of its remaining rival the time of exit is the only strategic variable so that our model is a war of attrition in contrast to the classic war of attrition however we assume that with positive probability each firm s costs may be low enough that staying in forever is a dominant strategy thus our model unlike the classic one has a unique equilibrium

guns butter and anarchy a state in the international system implicit in realism must allocate its limited resources between satisfying its intrinsically valued ends and the means of military power i formalize this guns versus butter problem in a simple infinite horizon model in which two states must continually decide how to allocate their resources and whether to attack the other state the analysis establishes sufficient conditions to ensure the existence of an equilibrium in which neither state attacks shows that there is a strictly pareto dominant pair of peaceful equilibrium payoffs characterizes the unique peaceful markov perfect equilibrium that yields them and describes the comparative statics of the equilibrium allocations more broadly the analysis also suggests that the notion of anarchy has little if any substantive significance distinctively related to international politics and that the problem of absolute and relative gains is superfluous

political regimes and economic growth arguments that relate regimes to growth focus on property rights pressures for immediate consumption and the autonomy of dictators while everyone seems to agree that secure property rights foster growth it is controversial whether democracies or dictatorships better secure these rights the main mechanism by which democracy is thought to hinder growth is pressure for immediate consumption which reduces investment only states that are institutionally insulated from such pressures can resist them and democratic states are not the main argument against dictatorships is that authoritarian rulers have no interest in maximizing total output these views are summarized in turn

domestic politics and international conflict this paper explores the interactions between domestic politics and international conflict the analysis shows that electoral uncertainty associated with competition between political parties each representing a specific group of the electorate imparts a negative bias on the nation s military spending given military spending by other nations in turn electoral uncertainty lowers other nations incentive to arm as well in this context democratic institutions can be thought of as a possible precommitment mechanism that reduces the severity of conflict between nations and thereby increases the amount of resources available globally for consumption copyright 1994 by american economic association

multi battle contests abstract we study equilibrium in a multistage race in which players compete in a sequence of simultaneous move component contests players may win a prize for winning each component contest as well as a prize for winning the overall race each component contest is an all pay auction with complete information we characterize the unique subgame perfect equilibrium analytically and demonstrate that it exhibits endogenous uncertainty even a large lead by one player does not fully discourage the other player and each feasible state is reached with positive probability in equilibrium pervasiveness expected effort in the component contests may be non monotonic in the closeness of the race and realized individual effort may exceed the value of the prize by a factor that is proportional to the maximum number of stage victories required

experimental comparison of multi stage and one stage contests this article experimentally studies a two stage elimination contest and compares its performance with a one stage contest contrary to the theory the two stage contest generates higher revenue than the equivalent one stage contest there is significant over dissipation in both stages of the two stage contest and experience diminishes over dissipation in the first stage but not in the second stage our experiment provides evidence that winning is a component in a subject s utility a simple behavioral model that accounts for a non monetary utility of winning can explain significant over dissipation in both contests it can also explain why the two stage contest generates higher revenue than the equivalent one stage contest

investment timing and learning externalities abstract we study a duopoly model of investment in which each player learns about the quality of a common value project by observing some public background information and possibly the experience of his rival investment costs are private information and the background signal takes the form of a poisson process conditional on the quality of the project being low the resulting attrition game has a unique symmetric equilibrium which depends on initial public beliefs we determine the impact of changes in the cost and signal distributions on investment timing and how equilibrium is affected when a first mover advantage is introduced

can the shadow of the future harm cooperation abstract it is generally thought that in long term relationships high valuations of the future are conducive to cooperation in an intertemporal model of conflict however we demonstrate the possibility of the opposite effect a longer shadow of the future may harm cooperation in particular we show that the degree of inefficiency is positively related to i the agents valuation of the future ii potential growth rates in resources iii the size of initial resource endowments and iv the effectiveness of conflict

rent seeking with non identical sharing rules the primary object of this paper is to examine the role of differential sharing rules within a collective rent seeking setting on the possible non existence of nash equilibrium focusing on groups that distribute part of the rent equally among their members and the residual according to relative effort we show that in rent seeking societies applying the two polar sharing rules equilibrium never exists in the general case where groups apply different but not necessarily the polar sharing rules we study the relationship between group variability in distributing rents and the problem of non existence of equilibrium in the rent seeking game

from custer to thermopylae last stand behavior in multi stage contests abstract in a multi stage contest known as a two player race players display two fundamental behaviors 1 the laggard will make a last stand in order to avoid the cost of losing and 2 the player who is ahead will defend his lead if it is threatened last stand behavior in particular contrasts with previous research where the underdog simply gives up the distinctive results are achieved by introducing losing penalties and discounting into the racing environment this framework permits the momentum effect typically ascribed to the winner of early stages to be more thoroughly examined i study the likelihood that the underdog will catch up i find that neck and neck races are common when the losing penalty is large relative to the winning prize while landslide victories occur when the prize is relatively large closed form solutions are given for the case where players have a common winning prize and losing penalty

choice under uncertainty problems solved and unsolved ffifteen years ago the theory of choice under uncertainty could be considered one of the success stories of economic analysis it rested on solid axiomatic foundations it had seen important breakthroughs in the analytics of risk risk aversion and their applications to economic issues and it stood ready to provide the theoretical underpinnings for the newly emerging information revolution in economics 1 today choice under uncertainty is a field in flux the standard theory is being challenged on several grounds from both within and outside economics the nature of these challenges and of our profession s responses to them is the topic of this paper

risk aversion heterogeneity and contests we introduce a novel method of modellingcontests that avoids the complexitiesencountered by the best response function approach we analyse contests in which i there are many risk averse players ii attitudes to risk may differ acrossindividuals and iii the technology thattransforms rent seeking effort intoprobability of winning may also differacross individuals we establish that ifevery player has a constant degree ofabsolute risk aversion a uniqueequilibrium exists we also establishcomparative static results and examine howthe level of rent dissipation is affectedby the heterogeneity of attitudes towardsrisk and the precise nature of the technology

group contests with internal conflict and power asymmetry we investigate simultaneous inter and intra group conflict in the shadow of within group power asymmetry and complementarity in members group conflict efforts a more symmetric group faces a higher degree of internal conflict and might expend more effort in external conflict when the group conflict effort technology is highly complementary depending on the degree of complementarity the stronger player s relative contribution to external conflict might be higher in a more asymmetric group and as a result it is possible for the weaker player to earn a higher payoff in the absence of any complementarity the rent dissipation is non monotonic with the within group power asymmetry

the generalized war of attrition abstract we model a war of attrition with n k firms competing for n prizes in a natural oligopoly context the k 1 lowest value firms drop out instantaneously even though each firm s value is private information to itself in a standard setting context in which every competitor suffers losses until a standard is chosen even after giving up on its own preferred alternative each firm s exit time is independent both of k and of other players actions our results explain how long it takes to form a winning coalition in politics solving the model is facilitated by the revenue equivalence theorem jel d43 d44 l13 o30

capacity choice under uncertainty in a duopoly with endogenous exit abstract applying the real options framework this article investigates the investment decision of the entrant given that an incumbent is already active both firms have an option to exit this market if the demand level falls too low the combination of three decision components capacity choice entry and exit timing results into multiple trigger strategies for the entrant in particular in the presence of a large incumbent it can either choose to coexist with its rival in a duopoly or eventually monopolize the market by installing a sufficiently large capacity the former scenario is realized when the market is large while the latter occurs when the market is small when the market is of intermediate size a hysteresis region emerges where the entrant does not take any actions and prefers to postpone investment

animals choices over uncertain outcomes further experimental results the betweenness axiom of expected utility theory which is not required under several nonexpected utility formulations is examined choices are checked for independence axiom violations in the allais direction and for fanning out in little explored areas of the unit probability triangle as predicted by machina s hypothesis ii the data show allais type violations of the independence axiom systematic failure of the fanning out hypothesis in the northwest portion of the unit probability triangle and consistent violations of the betweenness axiom in favor of folded orderings results are related to findings from human choice experiments exploring similar phenomena copyright 1991 by royal economic society

distributive politics and economic growth a crude distinction between economics and politics would be that economics is concerned with expanding the pie while politics is about distributing it in this paper we analyze the relationship between the two we focus on how an economy s initial configuration of resources shapes the political struggle for income and wealth distribution and how that in turn affects long run growth our main conclusion is that inequality is conducive to the adoption of growth retarding policies we derive this result from a simple political economy model of growth and present cross country evidence consistent with it the key feature of our model is that individuals differ in their relative factor endowments we distinguish between two types of factors an accumulated factor called capital and a nonaccumulated factor called labor growth is driven by the expansion of the capital stock which is in turn determined by individual saving decisions long run growth is endogenous as the aggregate production function is taken to be linearly homogeneous in capital and productive government services taken together the provision of government services is financed by a tax on capital because government services are productive a small tax on

swords or plowshares a theory of the security of claims to property this paper develops a general equilibrium model of the allocation of resources among appropriative and productive activities the model emphasizes the distinction between offensive weapons which are the instruments of predation and fortifications which provide defense against predation the analysis of this model shows how the equilibrium security of claims to property is determined the analysis focuses on the possibility of a nonaggressive equilibrium in which no resources are allocated to offensive weapons and claims to property are fully secure we also analyze the complex relation between economic welfare and the security of claims to property we find for example that a relatively poor agent could be better off in an equilibrium with less secure claims to property

three variants on the allais example three variants on the famous allais example were administered to student subjects two variants involved small changes in the example yet greatly diminished the qualitative behavior known as the allais paradox the third variant is almost a direct test of daniel kahneman and amos tversky s certainty effect against mark machina s fanning out hypothesis the results favor the certainty effect over the fanning out hypothesis for at least the case of straight line indifference curves copyright 1989 by american economic association

how organizational structure can reduce rent seeking in multi tiered organizations individuals can engage in unproductive rent seeking activities both within and between the divisions of the organization nevertheless a multi tiered organizational structure can induce efficiency gains by decreasing rent seeking we present a model of production and simultaneous internal and external rent seeking assuming a logistic contest success function in equilibrium there is generically either internal or external rent seeking but not both a multi tiered organization leads to less rent seeking and higher welfare even though the production technology gives no reason for any specific organizational structure our findings constitute a new efficiency rationale for multi tiered organizations

political variables in cross country growth analysis the recent boom in cross country growth analysis has renewed the empirical interest in political sources of economic growth a large number of studies have tested political variables in growth regressions and a very heterogenous set of variables has been proposed to measure economically relevant differences in the political systems of countries this paper distinguishes five categories of relevant political variables democracy government stability political violence policy volatility and subjective perception of politics for each of these categories the specification testing method and results of the most relevant studies are presented and are critically discussed the paper concludes that measures of democracy are least successful and measures of policy volatility and subjective perception of politics most successful as explanatory variables in cross country growth regressions

liquidity constraints and the formation of unbalanced contests abstract we analyze the effects of future liquidity constraints on contestants investment in a dynamic contest model contestants invest in two consecutive contests to win a prize in each period the loser of the first period contest can be liquidity constrained in the second period due to too little remaining wealth the winner of the first contest can reinvest the prize in the second contest we show that future liquidity constraints mainly affect the imbalance of the contest in the future but not today surprisingly larger contest prizes decrease contestants future investments and amplify the imbalance of future contests however the contest organizer can reduce this imbalance by increasing the share of the prize money in the second contest