public capital in the 21st century as productive as ever abstractthe global financial crisis and the euro area sovereign debt crisis that followed induced a rapid deterioration in the fiscal positions of countries across the globe in the ensuing fiscal

the u s and u k great depressions through the lens of neoclassical growth theory neoclassical growth theory is increasingly being used to study great depressions see e g mario j crucini and james kahn 1996 cole and ohanian 1999 2001a b 2002 michael bordo et al 2000 see also the january 2002 issue of the review of economic dynamics this paper extends our recent work that focuses on why the u s and u k great depressions lasted so long one of the key messages from our work is that the standard neoclassical growth model fails to account for the long duration of these depressions this paper extends our work by diagnosing the specific failures of the model we do this by measuring the deviations in the model s first order conditions we then use these deviations to identify particular factors that might account for these long durations we find very large deviations in the model s household labor efficiency condition in both countries and in the firm s labor efficiency condition in the united states these deviations provide new support for our recent conclusions that distorting labor market policies are key factors behind the long durations of both depressions cole and ohanian 2001a b

does adversity affect long term financial behaviour evidence from china s rustication programme abstract this paper examines the long term effects of adversity on financial behaviour it draws on the largest forced migration experiment in history china s rustication programme evidence from the chinese twins survey and chinese household income project shows that rusticated individuals behave conservatively with respect to finances over the long term compared with their age eligible but nonrusticated peers they reduce housing consumption and its share of total assets increase savings accumulate more safe assets and invest less in risky assets such patterns are consistent with evidence from manually collected county gazetteer data possible mechanisms include reduced productivity habit formation and psychological changes

does neoclassical theory account for the effects of big fiscal shocks evidence from world war ii much debate surrounds the usefulness of the neoclassical growth model for assessing the macroeconomic impact of fiscal shocks we test the theory using data from world war ii which is by far the largest fiscal shock in the history of the united states we take observed changes in fiscal policy during the war as inputs into a parameterized dynamic general equilibrium model and compare the values of all variables in the model to the actual values of these variables in the data our main finding is that the theory quantitatively accounts for macroeconomic activity during this big fiscal shock

government spending and private consumption this paper investigates the macroeconomic effects of anticipations about future fiscal expenditures within a simple perfect foresight general equilibrium model this paper extends s djajic 1987 by investigating an anticipated permanent increase in government spending an anticipated permanent increase may temporarily stimulate capital accumulation the questions of whether anticipated or unanticipated changes in government spending have a larger effect on capital accumulation and output is related to the questions of whether government spending is initially above or below the optimal level

output effects of government purchases the theoretical analysis focuses on the distinction between temporary and permanent movements in government purchases under plausible conditions the temporary case involves an output response that is positive less than one to one with the change in government purchases and larger than that generated by an equal sized but permanent shift in purchase the equilibrium real rate of return rise in the temporary case but changes little in the permanent one defense purchases are divided empirically into permanent and temporary components by considering the role of temporary wars no temporary shifts in nondefense purchases were isolated empirical results verify an expansionary output effect for temporary purchases that exceeds that of permanent purchases the results for some other expectational hypotheses are found to be generally supportive of the theory

financialization and u s income inequality 1970 2008 focusing on u s nonfinance industries we examine the connection between financialization and rising income inequality we argue that the increasing reliance on earnings realized through financial channels decoupled the generation of surplus from production strengthening owners and elite workers negotiating power relative to other workers the result was an incremental exclusion of the general workforce from revenue generating and compensation setting processes using time series cross section data at the industry level we find that increasing dependence on financial income in the long run is associated with reducing labor s share of income increasing top executives share of compensation and increasing earnings dispersion among workers net of conventional explanations such as deunionization globalization technological change and capital investment the effects of financialization on all three dimensions of income inequality are substantial our counterfactual analysis suggests that financial

great recession slow recovery and muted fiscal policies in the us this paper reconsiders the role of macroeconomic shocks and policies in determining the great recession and the subsequent recovery in the us the great recession was mainly caused by a large demand shock and by the zlb on the interest rate policy in contrast with previous findings the subsequent jobless recovery is explained by the zlb effect we estimate a fraction of non ricardian households which is close to 50 and obtain comparatively large fiscal multipliers however we cannot detect a significant contribution of fiscal policies in stabilizing the us economy for instance the 2007 2009 large increase in expenditure to gdp ratios was apparently determined by the adverse non policy shocks that caused the recession

temporary and permanent government spending in an open economy some evidence for the united kingdom abstract this paper investigates the effects of government spending changes on a small open economy in an intertemporal substitution framework if agents internalize the government s budget constraint temporary and permanent spending have different implications for wealth and consequently different effects on output and the balance of trade estimation of these effects isolates the different channels through which government spending can influence economic activity main findings for the united kingdom are that government spending i crowds out private spending ii is directly productive and iii when rising permanently leads to a negative wealth effect which induces a large rise in work effort

the effect of government spending on private consumption a puzzle the empirical finding that cyclical changes in government spending tend to be associated with positive responses of private consumption has been interpreted as a challenge for representative agent intertemporal optimizing theories which usually imply that the negative wealth effect of higher fiscal spending reduces the households consumption and leisure the present paper shows that the evidence can be explained by a standard real business cycle type model with a nonadditively separable utility function and a small intertemporal consumption elasticity higher fiscal spending can raise consumption and lower investment as in the data the nonseparable utility model is shown to imply the same consumption euler equation as a model with rule of thumb consumers who mechanically spend their income

why does private consumption rise after a government spending shock recent empirical evidence suggests that private consumption is crowded in by government spending this outcome violates existing macroeconomic theory according to which the negative wealth effect brought about by a rise in public expenditure should decrease consumption

some fiscal calculus what is the impact of fiscal policy on the econ omy how large are the multipliers of govern ment spending and tax cuts this old question has recently received considerable attention in par ticular in the context of the american recovery and reinvestment act arra of 2009 i contribute to answering that question by calculating fiscal multipliers in a baseline neo classical growth model with endogenous labor supply and fiscal policy allowing for govern ment spending transfers government debt and distortionary taxes on labor and capital income the policy experiments are conducted holding transfers consumption taxes and capital income taxes fixed i e changes in taxation require changes in the distortionary labor tax the model is simple and fairly standard as an additional contribution i provide the model in an elegant and tractable form starting from a fairly general formulation and pointing out the key functional form properties for characterizing the dynamics the formulation of the model here or versions

macroeconomic effects from government purchases and taxes for u s annual data that include world war ii the estimated multiplier for temporary defense spending is 0 4 0 5 contemporaneously and 0 6 0 7 over 2 years if the change in defense spending is permanent gauged by ramey s defense news variable the multipliers are higher by 0 1 0 2 since all estimated multipliers are significantly less than 1 greater spending crowds out other components of gdp particularly investment the lack of good instruments prevents estimation of reliable multipliers for nondefense purchases multipliers in the literature of two or more likely reflect reverse causation from gdp to nondefense purchases increases in average marginal income tax rates measured by a newly constructed time series have significantly negative effects on gdp when interpreted as a tax multiplier the magnitude is around 1 1 the combination of the estimated spending and tax multipliers implies that the balanced budget multiplier for defense spending is negative we have some evidence that tax changes affect gdp mainly through substitution effects rather than wealth effects

government investment and fiscal stimulus effects of government investment are studied in an estimated neoclassical growth model the analysis focuses on two dimensions that are critical for understanding government investment as a fiscal stimulus implementation delays for building public capital and expected fiscal adjustments to deficit financed spending implementation delays can produce small or even negative labor and output responses to increases in government investment in the short run anticipated fiscal adjustments matter both quantitatively and qualitatively for long run growth effects when public capital is insufficiently productive distorting financing can make government investment contractionary at longer horizons

the effects of fiscal shocks on employment and the real wage we study the transmission of fiscal shocks in the labor market we employ a structural var and base identification on the restrictions that shocks to government consumption investment and employment must raise output and deficits these restrictions hold in both prototype real business cycle rbc and new keynesian models shocks to government consumption and investment increase real wages and employment contemporaneously both at state level and in the aggregate the dynamics in response to employment shocks are mixed increases in government employment raise the real wage and total employment in the aggregate however in one third of the states they reduce total employment

investment shocks and business cycles abstract the origins of business cycles are still controversial among macroeconomists this paper contributes to this debate by studying the driving forces of fluctuations in an estimated new neoclassical synthesis model of the u s economy in this model most of the variability of output and hours at business cycle frequencies is due to shocks to the marginal efficiency of investment imperfect competition and to a lesser extent technological frictions are the key to their transmission although labor supply shocks explain a large fraction of the fluctuations in hours at very low frequencies they are irrelevant over the business cycle this finding is important because the microfoundations of these disturbances are widely regarded as unappealing

can government purchases stimulate the economy this essay briefly reviews the state of knowledge about the government spending multiplier drawing on theoretical work aggregate empirical estimates from the united states as well as cross locality estimates i assess the likely range of multiplier values for the experiment most relevant to the stimulus package debate a temporary deficit financed increase in government purchases i conclude that the multiplier for this type of spending is probably between 0 8 and 1 5 jel e23 e62 h50

learning to love the government trade unions and late adoption of the minimum wage one counterintuitive variation in wage setting regulation is that countries with the highest labor standards and strongest labor movements are among the least likely to set a statutory minimum wage this the author argues is due largely to trade union opposition trade unions oppose the minimum wage when they face minimal low wage competition which is affected by the political institutions regulating industrial action collective agreements and employment as well as by the skill and wage levels of their members when political institutions effectively regulate low wage competition unions oppose the minimum wage when political institutions are less favorable toward unions there may be a cleavage between high and low wage unions in their minimum wage preferences the argument is illustrated with case studies of the uk germany and sweden the author demonstrates how the regulation of low wage competition affects unions minimum wage preferences by exploiting the following labor market institutional shocks the conservatives labor law reforms in the uk the hartz labor market reforms in germany and the european court of justice s laval ruling in sweden the importance of union preferences for minimum wage adoption is also shown by how trade union confederation preferences influenced the position of the labour party in the uk and the social democratic party in germany

government spending and private consumption some international evidence this paper investigates the relationship between private consumption and publicly provided goods and services for a number of countries the empirical results show that in the aggregate private and government consumption are best described as complementary in the sense that an increase in one raises the marginal utility of the other the strength of this relationship is shown to be negatively affected by the government size these findings are robust across all specifications tried copyright 1994 by ohio state university press

what are the effects of fiscal policy shocks we propose and apply a new approach for analyzing the effects of fiscal policy using vector autoregressions specifically we use sign restrictions to identify a government revenue shock as well as a government spending shock while controlling for a generic business cycle shock and a monetary policy shock we explicitly allow for the possibility of announcement effects i e that a current fiscal policy shock changes fiscal policy variables in the future but not at present we construct the impulse responses to three linear combinations of these fiscal shocks corresponding to the three scenarios of deficit spending deficit financed tax cuts and a balanced budget spending expansion we apply the method to us quarterly data from 1955 to 2000 we find that deficit financed tax cuts work best among these three scenarios to improve gdp with a maximal present value multiplier of five dollars of total additional gdp per each dollar of the total cut in government revenue 5 years after the shock copyright 2009 john wiley sons ltd

unemployment fiscal multipliers we estimate the effects of fiscal policy on the labor market in us data an increase in government spending of 1 percent of gdp generates output and unemployment multipliers respectively of about 1 2 percent at one year and 0 6 percentage points at the peak each percentage point increase in gdp produces an increase in employment of about 1 3 million jobs total hours employment and the job finding probability all rise whereas the separation rate falls a standard neoclassical model augmented with search and matching frictions in the labor market largely fails in reproducing the size of the output multiplier whereas it can produce a realistic unemployment multiplier but only under a special parameterization extending the model to strengthen the complementarity in preferences to include unemployment benefits real wage rigidity and or debt financing with distortionary taxation only worsens the picture new keynesian features only marginally magnify the size of the multipliers when complementarity is coupled with price stickiness however the magnification effect can be large

is public expenditure productive abstract this paper considers the relationship between aggregate productivity and stock and flow government spending variables the empirical results indicate that i the nonmilitary public capital stock is dramatically more important in determining productivity than is either the flow of nonmilitary or military spending ii military capital bears little relation to productivity and iii a core infrastructure of streets highways airports mass transit sewers water systems etc has most explanatory power for productivity the paper also suggests an important role for the net public capital stock in the productivity slowdown of the last fifteen years

fiscal policy in the new neoclassical synthesis we analytically derive the cyclical effects of fiscal policy shocks in a new neoclassical synthesis model price stickiness has the consequence that a rise in government demand affects labor demand while at the same time the usual wealth effect boosts labor supply the strength of the demand effect depends on the response of the real interest rate governed by the monetary policy regime when the central bank controls money growth fiscal expansions are deflationary and might even be contractionary whereas output wages and inflation can increase when the rise in the real interest rate is dampened by an interest rate rule however price stickiness alone is not sufficient to explain a rise in consumption as predicted by keynesian theory

fiscal policy in general equilibrium this paper studies four classic fiscal policy experiments within a quantitatively restricted neoclassical model the authors main findings are as follows 1 permanent changes in government purchases can lead to short run and long run output multipliers that exceed one 2 permanent changes in government purchases induce larger effects than temporary changes 3 the financing decision is quantitatively more important than the resource cost of changes in government purchases and 4 public investment has dramatic effects on private output and investment these findings stem from important dynamic interactions of capital and labor absent in earlier equilibrium analyses of fiscal policy copyright 1993 by american economic association

propagation mechanisms for government spending shocks a bayesian comparison the inability of a simple real business cycle model to predict a rise in consumption in response to increased government expenditures observed in many empirical studies has stimulated the development of alternative theories of government spending shocks using the bayesian approach we evaluate the quantitative performance of five extant models and find that neither of the considered transmission mechanisms for government spending helps improve the fit of the baseline model moreover we find that consumption decreases in all estimated models in response to a rise in government spending

the effects of public spending externalities abstract we conduct a positive analysis on the effects of externalities produced by government spending to this effect we estimate using u s data an rbc model with two salient features first we allow government consumption to directly affect the marginal utility of consumption second we allow public capital to shift the productivity of private factors we provide an identification analysis that supports the strategy adopted for estimating the parameters governing these two channels on one hand private and government consumption are robustly estimated to be substitute goods because of substitutability labor supply reacts little to a government consumption shock so the estimated output multiplier is much lower than in models with separabilities on the other hand our results point towards public investment being unproductive

local identification in dsge models abstract the issue of identification arises whenever structural models are estimated lack of identification means that the empirical implications of some model parameters are either undetectable or indistinguishable from the implications of other parameters therefore identifiability must be verified prior to estimation this paper provides a simple method for conducting local identification analysis in linearized dsge models estimated in both full and limited information settings in addition to establishing which parameters are locally identified and which are not researchers can determine whether the identification failures are due to data limitations such as lack of observations for some variables or whether they are intrinsic to the structure of the model the methodology is illustrated using a medium scale dsge model

fiscal shocks and their consequences this paper investigates the response of hours worked and real wages to fiscal policy shocks in the post world war ii us we identify these shocks with exogenous changes in military purchases and argue that they lead to a persistent increase in government purchases and tax rates on capital and labor income and a persistent rise in aggregate hours worked as well as declines in real wages the shocks are also associated with short lived rises in aggregate investment and small movements in private consumption we describe and implement a methodology for assessing whether standard neoclassical models can account for the consequences of a fiscal policy shock simple versions of the neoclassical model can account for the qualitative effects of a fiscal shock once we allow for habit formation and investment adjustment costs the model can also account reasonably well for the quantitative effects of a fiscal shock

new keynesian versus old keynesian government spending multipliers renewed interest in fiscal policy has increased the use of quantitative models to evaluate policy because of modelling uncertainty it is essential that policy evaluations be robust to alternative assumptions we find that models currently being used in practice to evaluate fiscal policy stimulus proposals are not robust government spending multipliers in an alternative empirically estimated and widely cited new keynesian model are much smaller than in these old keynesian models the estimated stimulus is extremely small with gdp and employment effects only one sixth as large and with private sector employment impacts likely to be even smaller we investigate the sensitivity of our findings with regard to the response of monetary policy the zero bound on nominal interest rates and the inclusion of an empirically relevant degree of rule of thumb behaviour in the new keynesian model in addition we relate our findings using estimated structural macroeconomic models to the recent literature using reduced form regression techniques

public goods merit goods and the relation between private and government consumption in this paper we investigate the relation between public and private consumption by constructing a general government spending data set by function for 12 european countries in particular we split government consumption into two categories the 1rst category public goods includes defence public order and justice the second category merit goods includes health education and other services that could have been provided privately equations from a relatively general permanent income model are estimated by gmm the estimates are fairly robust in showing that public goods substitute while merit goods complement private consumption however the relation between merit goods and private goods turns out to be stronger than that between public goods and private goods thus in the aggregate government and private consumption are complements c