the effect of charter competition on unionized district revenues and resource allocation abstract this study examines the impact of competition due to charter school entry on the level of revenues and the composition of expenditures within traditional public school districts tpsds i leverage a policy change affecting the location and timing of charter entry to account for endogenous charter competition tpsds respond to competition by allocating resources away from instructional and other expenditures toward new capital construction using teacher contracts i show that collectively bargained salaries are largely unresponsive to competition and that declines in instructional spending are primarily due to decreases in the number of employed teachers competition depresses appraised housing valuations in turn causing tpsds to lose property tax revenues resulting in a decline in overall spending

better schools less crime i estimate the impact of attending a first choice middle or high school on adult crime using data from public school choice lotteries in charlotte mecklenburg school district cms seven years after random assignment lottery winners had been arrested for fewer serious crimes and had spent fewer days incarcerated the gain in school quality as measured by peer and teacher inputs was equivalent to moving from one of the lowest ranked schools to one at the district average the reduction in crime comes largely from years after enrollment in the preferred school is complete the impacts are concentrated among high risk youth who commit about 50 less crime across several different outcome measures and scalings of crime by severity i find suggestive evidence that school quality explains more of the impact in high school whereas peer effects are more important in middle school copyright 2011 oxford university press

information school choice and academic achievement evidence from two experiments we examine a natural experiment and a field experiment that provided direct information on school test scores to lower income families in a public school choice plan receiving information significantly increases the fraction of parents choosing higher performing schools parents with high scoring alternatives nearby were more likely to choose nonguaranteed schools with higher test scores using random variation from each experiment we find that attending a higher scoring school increases student test scores the results imply that school choice will most effectively increase academic achievement for disadvantaged students when parents have easy access to test score information and good options from which to choose

research design meets market design using centralized assignment for impact evaluation a growing number of school districts use centralized assignment mechanisms to allocate school seats in a manner that reflects student preferences and school priorities many of these assignment schemes use lotteries to ration seats when schools are oversubscribed the resulting random assignment opens the door to credible quasi experimental research designs for the evaluation of school effectiveness yet the question of how best to separate the lottery generated randomization integral to such designs from non random preferences and priorities remains open this paper develops easily implemented empirical strategies that fully exploit the random assignment embedded in a wide class of mechanisms while also revealing why seats are randomized at one school but not another we use these methods to evaluate charter schools in denver one of a growing number of districts that combine charter and traditional public schools in a unified assignment system the resulting estimates show large achievement gains from charter school attendance our approach generates efficiency gains over ad hoc methods such as those that focus on schools ranked first while also identifying a more representative average causal effect we also show how to use centralized assignment mechanisms to identify causal effects in models with multiple school sectors

prospect theory and the risk return association another look abstract in a seminal study fiegenbaum 1990 attempted to set down parameters of relationship between risk and return for firms and related it to two piece von neumann morgenstern utility function first explored empirically by fishburn and kochenberger 1979 i re examine the estimated relationship specifically i perform a meta analysis of the above and below median returns to show that the relationship between risk and return is weaker above median than below median i also show that the relationship between below median returns and above median returns is very small exhibiting compartmentalization of decision making by the firms similar to individual decision makers

a theory of voting equilibria a voting equilibrium arises when the voters in an electorate acting in accordance with both their preferences for the candidates and their perceptions of the relative chances of various pairs of candidates being in contention for victory generate an election result that justifies their perceptions voting equilibria always exist and the set of equilibria can vary substantially with the choice of voting system we compare equilibria under the plurality rule approval voting and the borda system we consider a candidate positioning game and find that the plurality rule imposes little restriction on the position of the winning candidate in three candidate races while approval voting leads to a winner positioned at the median of the voter distribution we contrast campaign activities intended to influence voter preferences with activities meant to influence only perceptions of candidate viability

effects of free choice among public schools in this paper i investigate the impact of a programme in tel aviv israel that terminated an existing inter district busing integration programme and allowed students free choice among public schools the identification is based on difference in differences and regression discontinuity designs that yield various alternative comparison groups drawn from untreated tangent neighbourhoods and adjacent cities across identification methods and comparison groups the results consistently suggest that choice significantly reduces the drop out rate and increases the cognitive achievements of high school students it also improves behavioural outcomes such as teacher student relationships and students social acclimation and satisfaction at school and reduces the level of violence and classroom disruption

school choice school quality and postsecondary attainment we study the impact of a public school choice lottery in charlotte mecklenburg schools on college enrollment and degree completion we find a significant overall increase in college attainment among lottery winners who attend their first choice school using rich administrative data on peers teachers course offerings and other inputs we show that the impacts of choice are strongly predicted by gains on several measures of school quality gains in attainment are concentrated among girls girls respond to attending a better school with higher grades and increases in college preparatory course taking while boys do not

information aggregation rationality and the condorcet jury theorem the condorcet jury theorem states that majorities are more likely than any single individual to select the better of two alternatives when there exists uncertainty about which of the two alternatives is in fact preferred most extant proofs of this theorem implicitly make the behavioral assumption that individuals vote sincerely in the collective decision making a seemingly innocuous assumption given that individuals are taken to possess a common preference for selecting the better alternative however in the model analyzed here we find that sincere behavior by all individuals is not rational even when individuals have such a common preference in particular sincere voting does not constitute a nash equilibrium a satisfactory rational choice foundation for the claim that majorities invariably do better than individuals therefore has yet to be derived

evaluating education programs that have lotteried admission and selective attrition we study the effectiveness of magnet programs in an urban district that ration excess demand by admission lotteries differential attrition arises since students who lose the lottery are more likely to pursue options outside the school district than students who win the lottery when students leave the district important outcome variables are often not observed the treatment effects are not point identified we exploit known quantiles of the outcome distribution to construct informative bounds on treatment effects we find that magnet programs improve behavioral outcomes but have no significant effect on achievement

the effect of school choice on participants evidence from randomized lotteries school choice has become an increasingly prominent strategy for enhancing academic achievement to evaluate the impact on participants we exploit randomized lotteries that determine high school admission in the chicago public schools compared to those students who lose lotteries students who win attend high schools that are better in a number of dimensions including peer achievement and attainment levels nonetheless we find little evidence that winning a lottery provides any systematic benefit across a wide variety of traditional academic measures lottery winners do however experience improvements on a subset of nontraditional outcome measures such as self reported disciplinary incidents and arrest rates

the problem of indeterminacy in approval multiple and truncated voting systems it is well known that a plurality election need not reflect the true sentiments of the electorate some of the proposed reform procedures such as approval and cumulative voting share the characteristics that there are several ways to tally each voter s preferences voting systems that permit truncated ballots share this feature it is shown that the election results for any such procedure can be highly indeterminate all possible election results can occur with the same choice of sincere voters this conclusion of indeterminacy holds even when measures of voters sentiments such as the existence of a condorcet winner or even much stronger measures indicate there is considerable agreement among the voters then multiple systems are compared with all standard tallying procedures for instance a corollary asserts it is probable for the plurality voting method to elect the condorcet winner while approval voting has an indeterminate outcome

leveraging lotteries for school value added testing and estimation conventional value added models vams compare average test scores across schools after regression adjusting for students demographic characteristics and previous scores this article tests for vam bias using a procedure that asks whether vam estimates accurately predict the achievement consequences of random assignment to specific schools test results from admissions lotteries in boston suggest conventional vam estimates are biased a finding that motivates the development of a hierarchical model describing the joint distribution of school value added bias and lottery compliance we use this model to assess the substantive importance of bias in conventional vam estimates and to construct hybrid value added estimates that optimally combine ordinary least squares and lottery based estimates of vam parameters the hybrid estimation strategy provides a general recipe for combining nonexperimental and quasi experimental estimates while still biased hybrid school value added estimates have lower mean squared error than conventional vam estimates simulations calibrated to the boston data show that bias notwithstanding policy decisions based on conventional vams that control for lagged achievement are likely to generate substantial achievement gains hybrid estimates that incorporate lotteries yield further gains

divided majority and information aggregation theory and experiment this paper studies theoretically and experimentally the properties of plurality and approval voting when a majority gets divided by information imperfections the majority faces two challenges aggregating information to select the best majority candidate and coordinating to defeat the minority candidate under plurality the majority cannot achieve both goals at once under approval voting it can welfare is strictly higher because some voters approve of both majority alternatives in the laboratory we find i strong evidence of strategic voting and ii superiority of approval voting over plurality finally subject behavior suggests the need to study equilibria in asymmetric strategies

benefits to elite schools and the expected returns to education evidence from mexico city we exploit data on the future earnings students at high school completion expect to receive with and without a college education together with information on learning achievement and college outcomes to study the benefits from admission into a system of elite public high schools in mexico city using data for the centralized allocation of students into schools and an adapted regression discontinuity design strategy we estimate that elite school admission increases the future earnings and returns students expect from a college education these gains in earnings expectations seem to reflect improvement in actual earnings opportunities as admission to this elite school system also enhances learning achievement and college graduation outcomes this provides evidence of the earnings benefits from attending elite schools

does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers tiebout choice among districts is the most powerful market force in american public education naive estimates of its effects are biased by endogenous district formation i derive instruments from the natural boundaries in a metropolitan area my results suggest that metropolitan areas with greater tiebout choice have more productive public schools and less private schooling little of the effect of tiebout choice works through its effect on household sorting this finding may be explained by another finding students are equally segregated by school in metropolitan areas with greater and lesser degrees of tiebout choice among districts

purification of bayes nash equilibrium with correlated types and interdependent payoffs abstract we establish purification results for bayes nash equilibrium in a large class of bayesian games with finite sets of pure actions we allow for correlated types and interdependent payoffs and for type dependent feasible action sets the latter feature allows us to prove existence and purification results for pure bayes nash equilibria in undominated strategies we give applications to auctions global games and voting to illustrate the usefulness of our results

information asymmetry and equilibrium monitoring in education abstract we develop a theoretical and computational model of school choice and achievement that embeds information asymmetries in the provision of education because school effort is unobservable to households and policymakers schools have an incentive to under provide effort this moral hazard affects both public and private schools although public schools are subject to an additional distortion because of limited competition and fixed funding household monitoring of schools can mitigate moral hazard but some households may free ride on the monitoring of others using our calibrated model we simulate two policies aimed at raising achievement public monitoring of public schools and private school vouchers our results indicate that in large scale settings no single tool may suffice the reason is twofold a no tool raises achievement or welfare for all households and b since the extent of moral hazard is endogenous the application of each tool has unintended consequences that limit its own effectiveness results also indicate that setting the policy parameters for public schools at the levels preferred by the majority of households may mitigate the distortions nonetheless the current actual values of these parameters seem to match more closely the preferences of public schools than the preferences of parents

what floats your boat preference revelation from lotteries over complex goods abstract we examine a type of lottery used to distribute some publicly held resource access rights the lottery provides participants with the opportunity to choose among a set of simple gambles over multi attribute goods participant choices result in an endogenous distribution of success rates over gambles that reflects tradeoffs between the relative desirability of the available goods and the probability of winning when lottery winnings are multi attribute goods lottery outcomes provide sufficient information to estimate hedonic prices marginal utility and marginal rates of substitution among attributes we develop a model for characterizing preferences from this information set we apply our model to idaho s four rivers whitewater recreation lottery which allows applicants to apply for one permit among a large set of alternative river day combinations that provide varying river and weather characteristics this lottery structure shows promise as a foundation for economic experiments for preference revelation

the aggregate effect of school choice evidence from a two stage experiment in india we present experimental evidence on the impact of a school choice program in the indian state of andhra pradesh that provided students with a voucher to finance attending a private school of their choice the study design featured a unique two stage lottery based allocation of vouchers that created both student level and market level experiments which allows us to study the individual and the aggregate effects of school choice including spillovers after two and four years of the program we find no difference between test scores of lottery winners and losers on telugu native language math english and science social studies suggesting that the large cross sectional differences in test scores across public and private schools mostly reflect omitted variables however private schools also teach hindi which is not taught by the public schools and lottery winners have much higher test scores in hindi furthermore the mean cost per student in the private schools in our sample was less than a third of the cost in public schools thus private schools in this setting deliver slightly better test score gains than their public counterparts better on hindi and same in other subjects and do so at a substantially lower cost per student finally we find no evidence of spillovers on public school students who do not apply for the voucher or on private school students suggesting that the positive effects on voucher winners did not come at the expense of other students jel codes c93 h44 h52 i21 o15

underpricing in public lotteries a critique of user pay and all pay tariffs i introduction a body of literature spanning from medical ethics to public economics has amassed regarding the nonmarket rationing of public resources a dominant focus has surrounded the merits and shortcomings of alternative rationing mechanisms as gauged by their effectiveness distributive justness and allocative efficiency these instruments include administrative criteria such as need merit or seniority based rules queues or waiting lines whereby access to the rationed good or service is determined by arrival times and lotteries whereby chance dictates the distribution of the good while nonmarket rationing in any case may lead to the misallocation of resources compared to rationing solely by price e g glaeser and luttmer 2003 empirical observation reveals that public agencies commonly distribute underpriced goods and services to individual consumers and firms the current study takes nonmarket rationing as given and investigates the properties of alternative lottery mechanisms the use of lot teries dates to biblical times boyce 1994 elster 1992 with modern examples including the military draft fienberg 1971 medical services cookson and dolan 2000 recreational privileges on public lands and waterways scrogin 2005 residential housing following hurricane katrina the white house office of the press secretary 2005 and public school admission and voucher programs berry cullen jacob and levitt 2006 from a design perspective lotteries are intriguing because they can take a variety of forms with each possessing unique incentive and revenue generating properties however given the purported inefficiencies of lottery rationing it is natural to question how they have sustained in allocative situations entailing public resources two explanations have emerged in the literature the first historic explanation is attributed to the fairness of the classic lottery mechanism in which the probability of being drawn is uniform and endogenous to the number of participants because entrants are equally likely to be drawn the mechanism is perceived as being nondiscriminatory empirical evidence presented in kemp and bolle 1999 supports this hypothesis in the rationing of some types of goods and services to individual consumers the fairness of lottery rationing is also consistent with the distributive objective of specific egalitarianism put forth by tobin 1970 and discussed later by elster 1992 whereby specific goods and services are allocated such that a greater degree of equality is attained relative to that of a competitive market while egalitarianism and efficiency would appear to be at odds che and gale 2007 demonstrated that lotteries can be more efficient than markets when individuals face binding wealth constraints in a similar vein wijkander 1988 demonstrated that social welfare can be increased by lottery rationing under certain conditions a second more objective explanation for the sustained use of lotteries is that public agencies may be legally constrained by price controls particularly when rationing to individuals and households taylor tsui and zhu 2003 acting as a self sustaining regulated monopolist the agency is confronted with selecting a rationing mechanism and a pricing policy that are both politically feasible and financially viable compared to need merit and seniority based allocation rules lotteries and queues are administratively simple and low cost to implement alternatively lotteries eschew the waiting time and coordination costs confronted by potential entrants under queuing however the initial distribution under lottery rationing may prove allocatively inefficient collectively the literature suggests that agency objectives may deviate from revenue maximization in distributing some types of scarce public resources with lotteries proving to be superior in some settings to alternative nonmarket rationing mechanisms

private school vouchers and student achievement an evaluation of the milwaukee parental choice program in 1990 wisconsin began providing vouchers to a small number of low income students to attend nonsectarian private schools controlling for individual fixed effects i compare the test scores of students selected to attend a participating private school with those of unsuccessful applicants and other students from the milwaukee public schools i find that students in the milwaukee parental choice program had faster math score gains than but similar reading score gains to the comparison groups the results appear robust to data imputations and sample attrition although these deficiencies of the data should be kept in mind when interpreting the results

the impact of school choice on student outcomes an analysis of the chicago public schools we explore the impact of school choice on student outcomes in the context of open enrollment within the chicago public schools cps roughly half of the students opt out of their assigned high school to attend a different cps school and these students are much more likely than those who remain in their assigned schools to graduate to determine the source of this apparent benefit we compare outcomes across i similar students with differential access to schooling options and ii travelers and non travelers within the same school the results suggest that other than for students who select career academies the observed cross sectional benefits are likely spurious

the swing voter s curse with adversarial preferences abstract we analyze voting behavior in a large electorate in which voters have adversarial state contingent preferences with incomplete information about the state of the world we show that one type of voter can suffer from the swing voter s curse a la feddersen and pesendorfer the swing voter s curse amer econ rev 86 1996 408 424 and go on to characterize the symmetric nash equilibria of this model under different parameter values we prove that unlike settings with nonadversarial preferences there are equilibria in which in one state of the world a minority preferred candidate almost surely wins the election and thus the election may fail to correctly aggregate information indeed we show that the fraction of the electorate dissatisfied with the result can be as large as 66 2 3

choice of ontario high schools and student sorting by ability to what extent can offering more choice in schooling lead to cream skimming or the sorting of students by ability i study whether increased choice leads to student sorting by ability into high schools in the greater toronto area on average 41 of students opt out of the high school to which they would normally be assigned based on their residence students are more likely to opt out in areas where accessibility to other schools is greatest due to population density and explicit open enrolment policies while students of higher ability are generally more likely to opt out an interaction term between school choice and ability is insignificant suggesting that increased choice does not have differential impacts by student ability findings are robust to changes in assumptions about instrument exogeneity

peer effects in program participation the influence of peers could play an important role in the take up of social programs however estimating peer effects has proven challenging given the problems of reflection correlated unobservables and endogenous group membership we overcome these identification issues in the context of paid paternity leave in norway using a regression discontinuity design our approach differs from existing literature which attempts to measure peer effects by exploiting random assignment to peer groups in contrast we study peer effects in naturally occurring peer groups but exploit random variation in the price of a social program for a subset of individuals fathers of children born after april 1 1993 in norway were eligible for one month of governmental paid paternity leave while fathers of children born before this cutoff were not there is a sharp increase in fathers taking paternity leave immediately after the reform with take up rising from 3 to 35 while this quasirandom variation changed the cost of paternity leave for some fathers and not others it did not directly affect the cost for the father s coworkers or brothers therefore any effect on the brother or the coworker can be attributed to the influence of the peer father in their network our key findings on peer effects are four fold first we find strong evidence for substantial peer effects of program participation in both workplace and family networks coworkers and brothers are 11 and 15 percentage points respectively more likely to take paternity leave if their peer father was induced to take up leave by the reform second the most likely mechanism is information transmission about costs and benefits including increased knowledge of how an employer will react third there is essential heterogeneity in the size of the peer effect depending on the strength of ties between peers highlighting the importance of duration intensity and frequency of social interactions fourth the estimated peer effect gets amplified over time with each subsequent birth exhibiting a snowball effect as the original peer father s influence cascades through a firm our findings demonstrate that peer effects can lead to long run equilibrium participation rates which are substantially higher than would otherwise be expected

reputation and school competition abstract stratification is a distinctive feature of competitive education markets that can be explained by a preference for good peers learning externalities can lead students to care about the ability of their peers resulting in across school sorting by ability this paper shows that a preference for good peers and therefore stratification can also emerge endogenously from reputational concerns that arise when graduates use their college of origin to signal their ability reputational concerns can also explain puzzling observed trends including the increase in student investment into admissions exam preparation and the decline in study time at college jel i21 i23 i26 j24

school vouchers a survey of the economics literature we review the theoretical computational and empirical research on school vouchers with a focus on the latter our assessment is that the evidence to date is not sufficient to warrant recommending that vouchers be adopted on a widespread basis however multiple positive findings support continued exploration specifically the empirical research on small scale programs does not suggest that awarding students a voucher is a systematically reliable way to improve educational outcomes and some detrimental effects have been found nevertheless in some settings or for some subgroups or outcomes vouchers can have a substantial positive effect on those who use them studies of large scale voucher programs find student sorting as a result of their implementation although of varying magnitude evidence on both small scale and large scale programs suggests that competition induced by vouchers leads public schools to improve moreover research is making progress on understanding how vouchers may be designed to limit adverse effects from sorting while preserving positive effects related to competition finally our sense is that work originating in a single case e g a given country or in a single research approach e g experimental designs will not provide a full understanding of voucher effects fairly wide ranging empirical and theoretical work will be necessary to make progress

what is a peer the role of network definitions in estimation of endogenous peer effects we employ a standard identification strategy from the peer effects literature to investigate the importance of network definitions in estimation of endogenous peer effects we use detailed information on friends in the national longitudinal study of adolescent health survey add health to construct two network definitions that are less ad hoc than the school grade cohorts commonly used in the educational peer effects literature we demonstrate that accurate definitions of the network seriously impact estimation of peer effects in particular we show that peer effects estimates on educational achievement smoking and drinking are substantially larger with our more detailed measures than with the school grade cohorts these results highlight the need to further understand how friendships form in order to fully understand implications for policy that alters the peer group mix at the classroom or cohort level

identification of treatment effects under imperfect matching with an application to chinese elite schools abstract this paper extends the treatment effect framework for causal inference to contexts in which the instrument appears in a data set that can only be linked imperfectly to the treatment and outcome variables contained in another data set to overcome this problem i form all pairwise links between information on the instrument and information on the treatment and outcome matched by the commonly recorded personal characteristics in both data sets i show how these imperfect conditional matches can be used to identify both the average and distributional treatment effects for compliers of the common units of the two data sets this multiple data source approach is then applied to analyze the effect of attending an elite middle school in a chinese city where schools admissions lottery records can only be linked imperfectly to the administrative student records

does the market value value added evidence from housing prices after a public release of school and teacher value added value added data are an increasingly common evaluation tool for schools and teachers many school districts have adopted these methods and released the results publicly in this paper we study the release of value added data in los angeles by the los angeles times newspaper to identify how measured value added is capitalized into housing prices this analysis is the first in the us school valuation literature to examine property value responses to a value added information shock which is of interest as this measure is less correlated with demographics than typical school quality measures unique to this setting as well is the release of both school and teacher level value added data which allows us to examine how property values respond to both types of information using a difference indifferences methodology surrounding the release we find that neither school nor teacher value added scores are capitalized into home prices our results suggest that despite the contentiousness following these data releases homeowners do not consider value added models as currently constructed to be a relevant school quality measure on the margin

would rational voters acquire costly information abstract we analyze an election in which voters are uncertain about which of two alternatives is better for them voters can acquire some costly information about the alternatives in agreement with downs s rational ignorance hypothesis individual investment in political information declines to zero as the number of voters increases however if the marginal cost of information is near zero for nearly irrelevant information there is a sequence of equilibria such that the election outcome is likely to correspond to the interests of the majority for arbitrarily large numbers of voters thus rationally ignorant voters are consistent with a well informed electorate

does greater school autonomy make a difference evidence from a randomized natural experiment in south korea abstract we exploit the unique features of high schools in seoul to study the effects of school autonomy on student outcomes under south korea s equalization policy both private and public schools in seoul admit students that are assigned randomly to them receive equal government funding charge identical fees and use similar curricula however private schools have greater flexibility in personnel decisions and their principals and teachers face stronger incentives to perform we find that private high schools have better student outcomes than public high schools our results suggest that autonomy in personnel decisions explains the positive student outcomes in private schools

accountability and flexibility in public schools evidence from boston s charters and pilots charter schools are publicly funded but operate outside the regulatory framework and collective bargaining agreements characteristic of traditional public schools in return for this freedom charter schools are subject to heightened accountability this paper estimates the impact of charter school attendance on student achievement using data from boston where charter schools enroll a growing share of students we also evaluate an alternative to the charter model boston s pilot schools these schools have some of the independence of charter schools but operate within the school district face little risk of closure and are covered by many of same collective bargaining provisions as traditional public schools estimates using student assignment lotteries show large and significant test score gains for charter lottery winners in middle and high school in contrast lottery based estimates for pilot schools are small and mostly insignificant the large positive lottery based estimates for charter schools are similar to estimates constructed using statistical controls in the same sample but larger than those using statistical controls in a wider sample of schools the latter are still substantial however the estimates for pilot schools are smaller and more variable than those for charters with some significant negative effects

stability and coordination in duverger s law a formal model of preelection polls and strategic voting this paper investigates the dynamics of the wasted vote phenomenon and duverger s law i construct a theoretical model in order to consider how preelection polls serve to inform the electorate about the relative chances of the candidates and how that information acts over time to decrease the support of the trailing candidate the results shed light on how public opinion polls can aggregate information in the electorate and coordinate voters on the viable candidates in the election specifically i show that in a bayesian game model of strategic voting there exist non duvergerian equilibria in which all three candidates receive votes in the limit these equilibria require extreme coordination however and any variation in beliefs leads voters away from them to one of the duvergerian equilibria thus non duvergerian equilibria are unstable while two party equilibria are not in addition i describe how preelection polls provide information to voters about the viability of candidates and can thus be used by voters to coordinate on a duvergerian outcome

priorities in school choice the case of the boston mechanism in barcelona abstract the boston mechanism is a school allocation procedure that is widely used around the world and has been criticized for its incentive problems in order to resolve overdemands for a given school most often priority is given to families living in the neighborhood of the school using a very rich data set on school applications for the case of the boston mechanism in barcelona we exploit an unexpected change in the definition of neighborhood this change allows us to identify that a large fraction of families systematically ranks first high priority schools neighborhood schools in this case additional data on school enrollment decisions and census data shows that some seemingly unsophisticated parents are high income families that can rank hard to get schools because they can afford the outside option of a private school in case they do not get in this sheds light on important inequalities beyond parents lack of sophistication found in the literature

disruption versus tiebout improvement the costs and benefits of switching schools most students change schools at some point in their academic careers but some change very frequently and some schools experience a great deal of turnover while many argue that mobility harms students economists tend to emphasize tiebout type moves to procure better school quality sq this paper disentangles the disruption effects of moves from changes in sq importantly it identifies the negative externality movers impose on other students student turnover is shown to entail a substantial cost for movers and non movers alike this cost appears to be larger for lower income and minority students who typically attend much higher turnover schools

vouchers for private schooling in colombia evidence from a randomized natural experiment colombia used lotteries to distribute vouchers which partially covered the cost of private secondary school for students who maintained satisfactory academic progress three years after the lotteries winners were about 10 percentage points more likely to have finished 8th grade primarily because they were less likely to repeat grades and scored 0 2 standard deviations higher on achievement tests there is some evidence that winners worked less than losers and were less likely to marry or cohabit as teenagers benefits to participants likely exceeded the 24 per winner additional cost to the government of supplying vouchers instead of public school places

neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment the moving to opportunity mto demonstration assigned housing vouchers via random lottery to public housing residents in five cities we use the exogenous variation in residential locations generated by mto to estimate neighborhood effects on youth crime and delinquency the offer to relocate to lower poverty areas reduces arrests among female youth for violent and property crimes relative to a control group for males the offer to relocate reduces arrests for violent crime at least in the short run but increases problem behaviors and property crime arrests the gender difference in treatment effects seems to reflect differences in how male and female youths from disadvantaged backgrounds adapt and respond to similar new neighborhood environments

preferences selection and value added a structural approach abstract what do applicants take into consideration when choosing a high school to what extent do schools contribute to their students academic success to answer these questions we model students preferences and obtain average valuation placed on each school we then investigate what drives these valuations by carefully controlling for endogeneity using a set of creative instruments suggested by our model we find that valuation is based on a school s location its selectivity as measured by its cutoff score value added and past performance in university entrance exams however cutoffs affect school valuation an order of magnitude more than does value added

the swing voter s curse the authors analyze two candidate elections in which some voters are uncertain about the realization of a state variable that affects the utility of all voters they demonstrate the existence of a swing voter s curse less informed indifferent voters strictly prefer to abstain rather than vote for either candidate even when voting is costless the swing voter s curse leads to the equilibrium result that a substantial fraction of the electorate will abstain even though all abstainers strictly prefer voting for one candidate over voting for another copyright 1996 by american economic association

finishing high school and starting college do catholic schools make a difference in this paper we consider two measures of the relative effectiveness of public and catholic schools finishing high school and starting college these measures are potentially more important indicators of school quality than standardized test scores in light of the economic consequences of obtaining more education single equation estimates suggest that for the typical student attending a catholic high school raises the probability of finishing high school or entering a four year college by thirteen percentage points in bivariate probit models we find almost no evidence that our single equation estimates are subject to selection bias