government debt government spending and private sector behavior comment in a recent issue of this review 1983 roger kormendi relied upon the work of martin bailey 1962 1971 and robert barro 1974 to develop an alternative approach to modeling private sector consumptionsaving behavior based on rational evaluation of the consequences of government fiscal policy p 995 briefly this approach involves determining to what extent government spending substitutes for private consumption and to what extent government debt is net wealth and thereby also affects private consumption this consolidated approach to examining private sector consumption is not only novel but appears at a time when there is widespread interest as well as controversy over the effects of government fiscal policy it therefore seems only appropriate to examine further the results obtained by kormendi not to criticize them but rather to explore their robustness this comment specifically explores the sensitivity of kormendi s results to alternative time periods of estimation to the differentiation between federal debt and state and local government debt and to the measurement of government debt particularly par vs market value

government debt government spending and private sector behavior revisited comment perhaps no issue has generated as much controversy among economists in the past decade as the proposition that an increase in the government deficit induces an equal offsetting increase in private saving the truth of this so called ricardian equivalence proposition is central to whether budget deficits reduce capital accumulation to the feasibility of expansionary tax reductions and to the effects of social security on private saving and aggregate capital accumulation although the basic idea that the future tax liabilities associated with government deficits and debt induce individuals to increase their saving has been around since the time of david ricardo and was treated explicitly by don patinkin 1965 martin bailey 1971 and levis kochin 1974 the current debate was launched by robert barro 1974 the voluminous theoretical literature of recent years has shown that complete ricardian equivalence would be expected to prevail only under very special conditions see douglas bernheim 1987 for an especially useful survey and analysis but the theoretical restrictiveness of the assumptions required for complete ricardian equivalence does not constitute a practical refutation defenders of ricardian equivalence can argue that the theory is only an approximation and can claim that although the stringent conditions required for complete ricardian equivalence do not hold the economy s behavior in practice is close to the predictions of ricardian equivalence there are two key empirical questions the first is whether a higher level of taxes with government spending constant induces individuals to reduce their spending on consumption as traditional theory holds or has no effect on consumer spending as the ricardian equivalence proposition predicts the second deals with the effect of government outlays on goods and services although the absence of a negative effect on consumer spending of such government outlays is clearly contrary to the ricardian equivalence proposition the existence of a moderate negative effect of government outlays on consumer spending is not in itself evidence in favor of the ricardian equivalence proposition that individuals increase their saving to finance anticipated debt service as feldstein 1982 explained consumers may correctly believe that a rise in current government spending is a good indicator of a higher level of future government spending once a program is launched or budgets increased the process is unlikely to be reversed an increase in current government spending is therefore a good indication that future taxes will have to be higher to finance a higher level of future government spending individuals may rationally reduce their own spending when government outlays increase without a concurrent increase in taxes because they anticipate higher future taxes to finance higher future government spending even if they give little or no weight to the debt service implications of the current deficit the strongest direct evidence in favor of ricardian equivalence is roger kormendi s 1983 article in the american economic review he presents consumption regression equations that relate an estimate of consumption to net national product wealth martin feldstein is professor of economics at harvard university and president of the national bureau of economic research douglas elmendorf is assistant professor of economics at harvard university we are grateful to greg mankiw and lawrence summers for comments on an earlier draft the research reported here is part of the nber study of the government budget and the private economy ikormendi defines consumption as the sum of current expenditures on services and nondurables plus 10

the economic consequences of federal deficits an examination of the net wealth and instability issues there is currently disagreement over the economic consequences of federal deficits some economists argue that deficits put upward pressure on real interest rates and thereby crowd out interest sensitive private spending others argue that deficits stemming from lump sum tax cuts do not raise interest rates because the response of individuals will be to increase their saving by the full amount of the resulting deficit to enable future generations to service i e make interest and principal payments on the additional debt without curtailing their consumption in other words individuals view debt and taxes as perfect substitutes because debt financed tax cuts imply higher taxes in the future to service that debt this effectively means that there really is no permanent tax cut so there is no increase in private net wealth current consumption or interest rates stated another way the debt that is issued to finance a tax cut does not add to private net wealth because it implies an offsetting future tax liability but if debt is not viewed as implying future tax increases then debt and taxes are not perfect substitutes and increases in debt resulting from tax cuts will indeed add to private net wealth stimulate consumption and raise interest rates 2

how efficient is the substitution of debt for taxes in influencing demand a 52 country macro theoretic model is developed in order to test the ricardian view that debt and tax finance are equivalent the alternative traditional view is that government expenditures financed by tax revenue affect the economy in profoundly different ways than expenditures financed by bond issuance a rigorous testing of the model indicates that a present value preserving transfer of income from future generations affects the consumption of the current generations in a positive for solvent countries or negative for debt ridden countries way an explanation for this divergence in consumer s behaviour is attempted via the concept of debt illusion

new tests of the life cycle and tax discounting hypotheses abstract we first test a version of the permanent income consumption function recently suggested by barro the results support the theory except that consumption expenditures show sensitivity to transitory income next we use the consumption model to test the tax discounting hypothesis which is strongly supported this support for tax discounting disagrees with results from some earlier studies using more traditional specifications of the consumption function however we show that when certain obviously inadequate estimation procedures are corrected the traditional models also support tax discounting this uniform support for tax discounting suggests that the sensitivity of consumption to transitory income is not due to liquidity constraints

endogenous government spending and ricardian equivalence many analyses of debt policy assume exogenous government expenditures instead the author uses an optimizing model in which the government endogenously selects values of taxes spending and debt to maximize welfare if demand for publicly provided goods is elastic a debt financed tax cut increases consumption because individuals rationally expect some reduced government spending in the future even though future taxes rise they do not offset the expansionary effect of the current tax cut on consumption depending on preferences the marginal propensity to consume out of tax cuts can take any value between zero and the marginal propensity out of ordinary income copyright 1992 by royal economic society

debt and taxes in the theory of public finance if a specified amount of government spending must be financed how should that finance be divided between taxes and government borrowing in the case of a temporary increase in government spending it has been argued that debt finance is optimal because the small increments in all future tax rates to finance interest payments involves a smaller excess burden than the single large tax rate increase that would be required to avoid an initial increase in the national debt this argument ignores the excess burden of debt finance that results if the initial capital stock is smaller than optimal e g because of taxes or capital income the first section of the present paper shows how the debt finance advantage of a small increase in tax rates can be explicitly balanced against the disadvantage of the excess burden that arises from additional debt the analysis shows that with plausible parameter values the excess burden of debt finance is likely to outweigh the advantage of avoiding a large single tax change and therefore that financing a temporary increase in government spending by an immediate tax increase is likely to be preferable to debt financing the second section examines the appropriate response to a permanent increase in government spending and shows that such spending cannot be financed by a permanent increase in government debt moreover whenever the golden rule level of capital intensity is an optimality condition independent of the level of government spending any increase in government spending should be matched by an equal increase in tax revenue this abstract was borrowed from another version of this item

government deficits and the term structure of interest rates abstract this paper investigates the effects of government deficits on interest rates with different terms to maturities a nonlinear term structure model with a time varying term premium is presented as a vehicle to discuss the ricardian equivalence hypothesis it is found that the nonlinear term structure model of the equivalence hypothesis that allows for a time varying term premium and a conditional heteroskedasticity is compatible with the data and performs far better than does the linear model

replicating ricardian equivalence tests with simulated series this paper replicates standard consumption function tests of ricardian equivalence using series generated from a model which nests ricardian equivalence within a non ricardian alternative due to finite horizons and or distortionary taxation the author shows that the estimates of the effects of taxation on consumption are not robust and that standard tests may have weaknesses which can lead to conflicting results whether ricardian equivalence holds or not the simulations also show that no clear conclusions about ricardian equivalence can be drawn from observing a low correlation between the current account and government budget deficits copyright 1997 by american economic association

government debt government spending and private sector behavior reply roger kormendi 1983 presents apparently strong evidence that in contrast to the standard view consumption is not reduced by taxes but is reduced by government expenditure he interprets his results as supporting a consolidated approach to private sector behavior in which consumers effectively internalize the government budget constraint specifically he claims that consumers regard government spending as the true measure of the government s claim on private resources and so do not respond to changes in taxes given spending this is basically the approach advocated by robert barro 1974 and known also as the ricardian equivalence proposition hereafter rep kormendi s results appears to contradict other empirical work based on the life cycle hypothesis for example martin feldstein 1982 modigliani 1984a sterling 1985 although results similar to his have been reported see david aschauer 1985 john seater and roberto mariano 1985 and the references in kormendi in our view kormendi s analysis is seriously flawed his heuristic derivation of the consumption function leads him to a specification of the aggregate consumption function which is not consistent with the life cycle hypothesis lch or with rep and to questionable methods of estimation once his conceptual and methodological errors are corrected his formulation and more generally the rep hypothesis are found to receive little empirical support in the next section we rely on the lch to derive an aggregate consumption function which shows explicitly how government expenditure and taxes should effect private consumption this derivation helps to bring out the observable implications of rep which are shown to be equivalent to a limiting form of the lch in which the planning horizon is infinite it also serves to clarify the appropriate specification of the variables appearing in the consumption function next section ii reports our empirical estimates and tests section iii compares our results with kormendi s finally section iv reports the results of endeavors to improve the specification of fiscal variables notably by distinguishing between permanent and transitory tax changes

ricardian equivalence and crowding out in asia rising budget deficits in both developed and developing countries have drawn considerable attention recently two aspects of these deficits have drawn particular attention first whether the effect of a given rate of government expenditure has a crowding out effect on private expenditure second whether this effect in any way depends on how the expenditures are financed that is whether by taxes or by government debt this latter issue is discussed under the rubric of what is called the ricardian equivalence proposition briefly it maintains that under certain assumptions the effect of a given rate of government expenditure on aggregate demand is independent of whether these expenditures are financed by taxes or by debt issue hence the proposition equivalence given the serious policy implications of this proposition there has been considerable empirical work on this issue but most of the work has been concentrated on the us and very little on the developing countries which is rather surprising

consumption saving and fiscal policy when this year s nobel laureate robert solow and ely lecturer alan blinder teamed their impressive talents several years ago to ask does fiscal policy matter the answer they gave was a resounding yes working in a then sophisticated neo keynesian is lm tradition blinder and solow presented a parsimonious macroeconomic model and some statistical and historical evidence suggesting that changes in the weighted standardized government surplus did indeed substantially affect real economic activity the profession was pretty much convinced that the permanent income hypothesis pih or life cycle hypothesis lch almost provided a sufficient framework for analyzing consumption and saving and hence the effects of fiscal policy curiously the large keynesian effect of a tax induced rise in current disposable income was reconciled with the very small effect predicted by the longerhorizon models with more of a whimper than a bang since then the profession has moved some distance from complete acceptance of the life cycle and permanent income hypotheses and perhaps even further from the traditional consumption function specification in vogue at that time indeed robert barro 1974 rekindled the notion that a tax fordebt swap would have no real effects an avalanche of analytical and empirical research has sharpened our understanding of the issues involved the econometric difficulties in estimating the relevant parameters and even the care necessary in defining what is meant when one asks whether fiscal policy has any real economic effects surprisingly despite numerous caveats new and improved data and estimation techniques and improved perspectives offered by analytical insights not yet prevalent when blinder and solow wrote their paper my conclusion is that their answer is essentially correct fiscal policy does matter both for short run stabilization purposes and for long run capital accumulation i believe the preponderance of the evidence strongly supports this view although the empirical research suggests that the impact of say tax cuts on consumption is perhaps only one third as large as the typical keynesian estimate of two decades ago but much larger than the neutrality predicted by ricardian equivalence or the very small effect predicted by the pih or lch

testing ricardian equivalence a reconsideration empirical evidence on the determinants of private consumption in 52 countries over the period 1979 88 indicates that in contrast to the ricardian equivalence proposition a significant relationship exists between consumption and the variable the ratio of tax revenue to changes in government debt which measures the extent of substituting debt for tax financing the results obtained from estimating euler equations for the representative individual s stochastic dynamic optimization problem are favourable to the proposition that the choice between current taxation and debt issuance to finance a given government expenditure stream is relevant to the determination of the level of aggregate demand

is ricardian equivalence a good approximation ricardian equivalence may be a good approximation even if all households have finite horizons many households have short horizons and an appreciable fraction of wage income is received by liquidity constrained households the approximation is likely to be better the more imperfect annuity markets are

uncertainty and the neutrality of government financing policy abstract some ideas from the theory of finance are applied to consider whether debt financed tax cuts affect desired consumption it is shown that government financing policy is a matter of indifference to infinitely lived households if a perfect substitute for public debt exists the analysis allows for uncertainty about future taxes and for missing markets in some kinds of assets income redistribution risk and the public insurance aspects of an income tax scheme qualify this neutrality result but in general the net effect is ambiguous the real resource costs of financial transacting as well as government superiority in the intermediation process may be one rationale for activist debt management policy a better understanding of functioning capital markets is essential to evaluate these arguments

economic policy in germany was there a turnaround germany under kohl martin hellwig and manfred neumann chancellor kohl came to power when germany was suffering its greatest post war confidence crisis output was stagnant the trade balance deteriorating unemployment rising and inflation uncomfortably high immediate priority was given to fiscal consolidation to bring the growing budget deficit under control the authors argue that in this instance fiscal contraction sufficiently boosted private sector confidence that overall demand was actually stimulated together fiscal rectitude by the federal government and monetary austerity by the bundesbank made possible sustained output growth against a background of falling inflation lower deficits also crowd in private investment in the longer run thus the authors judge kohl s macroeconomic policy a considerable success however unemployment has remained stubbornly high the authors attribute this to supply side failures the german labour market remains subject to many distortions which the kohl government has done little to remove nor has it seriously pursued deregulation of product markets german unemployment is likely to remain high at least until favourable demographic changes take effect in the 1990s

asset returns and government budgets in a small open economy empirical evidence for canada abstract in this paper we test the validity of the ricardian equivalence hypothesis by examining the relationship between the term structure of asset returns and macroeconomic policy variables our study extends the work of plosser 1982 1987 to the canadian case adapting his analysis to the small open economy the empirical results we obtain are consistent with the debt neutrality proposition of the ricardian equivalence hypothesis

fiscal stimulus in times of high debt reconsidering multipliers and twin deficits we investigate the impact of fiscal stimuli at different levels of the government debt to gdp ratio for a sample of 17 european countries from 1970 to 2010 this is implemented in an interacted panel var framework in which all coefficient parameters are allowed to change continuously with the debt to gdp ratio we find that responses to government spending shocks exhibit strong nonlinear behavior while the overall cumulative effect of a spending shock on real gdp is positive and significant at moderate debt to gdp ratios this effect turns negative as the ratio increases the total cumulative effect on the trade balance as a share of gdp is negative at first but switches sign at higher levels of debt consequently depending on the degree of public indebtedness our results accommodate long run fiscal multipliers that are greater and smaller than one or even negative as well as twin deficit and twin divergence behavior within one sample and time period from a policy perspective these results lend additional support to increased prudence at high public debt ratios because the effectiveness of fiscal stimuli to boost economic activity or resolve external imbalances may not be guaranteed

spillovers rivalry and r d investment spillovers of research knowledge are unavoidable most technologies have some public good aspects moreover rival firms are able to through industrial espionage and reverse engineering access and copy new innovations and are thus able to eat into monopoly profits of innovators the threat of spillovers affects r d investments and consequently reduces innovative activity imitators spend resources on acquiring or copying existing innovations resources that would have otherwise gone into the pursuit and development of new products and processes industries with excessive spillovers are likely to have little private r d investment and might have to rely on public r d funding while patents are designed to provide protection to inventors they provide only imperfect protection against imitation mansfield schwartz and wagner 13 have shown that a large number of patented innovations are copied in a relatively short time when patents do not provide adequate protection against spillovers fewer innovations might be forthcoming and firms might choose to not patent research spillovers however are not without their benefits whereas perfect appropriability generates static efficiency by conferring a monopoly on an innovator spillovers might be more efficient in a dynamic sense because of reduced duplication of research effort and perhaps more innovations in the long run the presence of r d spillovers thus creates a wedge between private and social returns to r d

assessing ricardian equivalence this paper reviews the literature on ricardian equivalence this hypothesis may be interpreted as a generalisation to the short and the long run of the theories which put no weight on the real effects of public policies on aggregate demand we argue that ricardian equivalence relies on both permanent income hypothesis and the fulfilment of the intertemporal government budget constraint the theoretical literature emphasises several reasons for departures from this hypothesis however the empirical literature is inconclusive when ricardian equivalence is tested in a life cycle framework the hypothesis is usually rejected while when the empirical analysis is based on optimising models it is usually accepted

government debt and the demand for money an extreme bound analysis m keivan deravi charles e hegji and h dean moberly the article provides evidence that there is a relationship between government debt and interest rates via the demand for money this relationship is examined through the wealth effect of government debt on money demand and the robustness of the results is tested by the use of extreme bound analysis in addition to standard econometric techniques we find that ols regression shows government debt affecting the demand for money positively implying that federal government debt is net wealth in addition the extreme bound analysis shows that the estimates of the government debt coefficient are robust under alternative specifications of the goldfeld model i introduction this paper studies the relationship between government debt and interest rates the approach used in this paper differs from previous studies in two ways first this relationship is examined through the wealth effect of government debt on the demand for money second the robustness of the results is tested by use of extreme bound analysis as an alternative to standard econometric techniques theoretically there is no clear cut consensus as to whether or not government debt should be net wealth the argument used most often is that government debt will be net wealth if future tax liabilities to service the debt are for the aggregate economy only partially discounted two explanations for this partial discounting are offered first in dealing with finite lived individuals thompson 1967 assumes that the average remaining lifetime of current taxpayers is shorter than for future interest payments on the federal debt in this situation the net present value of a stream of equal interest payments and taxes will be positive as a counter argument barro 1974 has shown that current generations can act effectively as if they are infinite lived when they are linked to future generations through a series of pairwise transfers of wealth here the realization by current generations that tax liabilities will be left to future generations extends the lifetime of the relevant stream of tax liabilities for debt service government debt is then wealth neutral mundell 1971 provides a second reason for partial discounting by assuming that capital markets are imperfect and that the relevant discount rate for tax liabilities is higher than the rate for interest payments these discount rates are respectively thought of as applying to high risk of loan default and low risk of loan default individuals this difference in discount rates creates a positive wealth effect since under mundell s assumptions government debt held by taxpayers involves a loan from low discount rate to high discount rate individuals as barro 1974 has again countered this wealth effect will exist only to the extent that the government is more efficient at providing such a loan than the private sector finally barro 1974 kormendi 1983 and later aschauer 1985 advance an argument as to why government debt might be negative net wealth suppose there is considerable uncertainty about the intertemporal and cross sectional burden of the future tax liability necessary to service the debt in this case the certainty equivalent value of these future taxes might exceed the certainty equivalent value of the future income stream of the debt so that government debt would be negative net wealth the majority of the empirical studies of the net wealth induced linkage between government debt and interest rates have attempted to measure this relationship using consumption functions if privately owned government debt is net wealth the wealth effect of this debt working through a keynesian consumption function will be positive so that increased government borrowing will result in increased current consumption and interest rates several studies have assessed the relationship between government borrowing and consumption or interest rates via this mechanism

policy impacts under rational expectations abstract this paper re examines for the u s the validity of the macro rational expectations mre hypothesis in contrast to most previous studies in this area the paper a considers the potential real effects of both monetary and fiscal policies b allows for possible endogeneity of these policies and c uses a joint non linear estimation methodology to distangle the hypothesis of rationality from that of neutrality the empirical results reject the joint mre hypothesis for both policies the results also indicate that policy non neutrality is the culprit behind such rejection this evidence offers further empirical support for macro rational expectations models where monetary and fiscal policies can due to some rigidities play a key role in stabilizing the real economy

why does private consumption rise after a government spending shock recent empirical evidence suggests that private consumption is crowded in by government spending this outcome violates existing macroeconomic theory according to which the negative wealth effect brought about by a rise in public expenditure should decrease consumption

an empirical analysis of the macroeconomic effects of government debt evidence from canada 1989 an empirical analysis of the macroeconomic effects of government debt evidence from canada applied economics vol 21 no 1 pp 113 124

have large budget deficits caused rising trade deficits for the united states the 1980s have been years of both large and unprecedented trade deficits as well as massive federal budget deficits the trade deficit rose from 25 billion in 1980 to 124 billion in 1985 during this same period federal budget deficits soared from 74 billion in 1980 to more than 212 billion in 1985 it is widely believed that the u s trade deficit rose mainly because of the skyrocketing federal budget deficit presenting such a view are for example hutchison and pigott 25 hutchison and pyle 26 clark 11 modigliani 30 and aschauer 2 besides economists many labor unions i e afl cio and official government documents see the economic report of the president particularly of 1984 have all shared similar views the issues involved have important policy implications suppose that the basic reason for rising trade deficits is indeed the escalating federal budget deficit in this case policy makers may focus on curtailing the budget deficit in order to resolve the trade deficit problem that has adversely affected several sectors such as manufacturing industries and agriculture however if such a view concerning the causal role of the budget deficit is incorrect then reductions in the federal budget deficit may not resolve the trade deficit dilemma and moreover attention will be diverted from more relevant and urgently needed policy options 6 the purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the conventional argument that high federal budget deficit has been the prime cause of the escalating u s trade deficit finding only partial empirical evidence to support it in section ii i argue that most of previous studies in this area appear flawed by a methodological error rendering their tests unreliable for discriminating between a number of equally plausible hypotheses section iii describes the data and methodology used in the paper section iv presents the empirical results section v summarizes and concludes the paper

success and failure of fiscal consolidation in the oecd a multivariate analysis this paper tests five hypotheses explaining the success and failure of fiscal consol idation in a multivariate regression framework these hypotheses concern i the composition of the consolidation programme ii its size and persistence iii the gravity of the debt situation iv the influence of the international macroeconomic environment and v the con tribution of a preceding devaluation to test for composition effects we use cyclically adjusted data although many conclusions of the existing empirical literature are confirmed some do not survive a popular hypothesis that to succeed consolidation should rely on cutting the government wage bill is rejected a new empirical result is that the contribution of a devalu ation to the success of fiscal consolidation depends on the composition of the consolidation programme

fiscal policy and saving under distortionary taxation an empirical investigation of the e ects of fiscal policy on saving is carried out using israeli data which display large variability in both the saving rate and the fiscal variables the framework is a small open economy model with distortionary taxation the theoretical analysis of the partial e ect of each fiscal variable on the national saving rate takes into account the necessary adjustment in future taxes the present model predicts for example that the income tax rate should have a negative e ect on saving in contrast to the keynesian view and that transfer payments and interest payments on the public debt should have positive e ects in contrast to the ricardian view under lump sum taxation the empirical results partly support the predictions of the model in particular for the income tax rate the methodology consists of two steps first quantitative predictions are obtained via simulation and then the simulated e ects are compared with the estimated coe cients 1998 elsevier science b v all rights reserved jel classification e62

budget balance through revenue or spending adjustments abstract the paper provides a historical perspective on the issue of whether budget deficits are typically eliminated by increased taxes or by reduced spending by examining u s budget data from 1792 1988 i conclude that about 50 65 of all deficits due to tax cuts and about 65 70 of all deficits due to higher government spending have been eliminated by subsequent spending cuts while the remainder was eliminated by subsequent tax increases in contrast to previous studies the empirical analysis uses error correction models in a way that the intertemporal budget constraint is imposed in the estimation stage

budgetary deficits and ricardian equivalence the case of india 1950 1986 abstract in this paper we analyze the validity of the ricardian equivalence re theorem for a less developed country ldc i e india for the period 1950 1986 the re theorem states that it is inconsequential whether a government deficit is financed by debt issue or by tax increases since under certain conditions the effect of government consumption on aggregate demand is orthogonal to the mode of financing fiscal deficits because rational economic agents consider today s deficit financing as tomorrow s tax liabilities the use of multicointegration analysis and estimation of the rational expectations model both invalidate the re hypothesis in india there are significant crowding out effects on private consumption but such effects on private investment are insignificant because they are expected to be already included in the effect of interest rates

fiscal policy and private consumption instrumental variables tests of the consolidated approach since barro s 1974 restatement of the debt neutrality proposition economists have directed considerable research toward determining whether fiscal policy can affect aggregate demand most of the debate both theoretical and empirical has focused on the net wealth content of privately held government debt although existing research has hardly provided a definitive resolution to this debate see for example blinder and deaton 1985 bernheim 1987 barro 1989 recent efforts feldstein 1982 kormendi 1983 aschauer 1985 leiderman and razin 1988 have followed bailey 1971 and broadened the scope of the investigation to include the possibility that government expenditures substitute for private consumption expenditures in doing so feldstein kormendi and aschauer have shown that fiscal neutrality implies certain restrictions on private consumption behavior the first of these restrictions is what feldstein 1982 calls ex ante crowding out for complete ex ante crowding out government spending on goods and services must substitute dollar for dollar for private spending consequently an increase in government expenditures on consumption goods should lead to an equivalent decrease in private consumption expenditures a second restriction is that government finance decisions should not affect private consumption barro 1974 has derived conditions under which this result will obtain essentially maximizing consumers are assumed to be rational and forward looking accurately foreseeing future taxes implied by

are consumption and government expenditures substitutes or complements morishima elasticity estimates from the fourier flexible form 1 introduction macroeconomists paid relatively little attention to the economic effects of government expenditures and to alternative methods of financing those expenditures until barro 1974 1979 1981 challenged conventional views on the economic impact of government activity much of the literature stimulated by these studies addressed the effects of alternative financing methods for a given path of government expenditures but barro 1981 also stressed the fact that government expenditures can provide direct welfare to economic agents and that variations in the level of government expenditures may have an impact on the consumption decisions of households as a result many studies estimate the extent to which economic agents treat government expenditures as substitutes to or complements with private consumption expenditures e g kormendi 1983 aschauer 1985 graham and himarios 1991 ni 1995 the degree of substitution or complementarity between private consumption and government expenditures is of crucial importance in assessing the impact of fiscal policies on economic welfare thus it is important to establish the extent to which federal expenditures and private consumption are substitutes or complements as a guide to the design of fiscal policies there is much disagreement about the extent to which consumption and government expenditures are substitutes or complements in use for economic agents 1 studies differ in their details so it is difficult to know what might account for such diverse results but it seems fair to say that the relationship between government expenditures and consumption is largely an open question the diversity of the results however may be a consequence of a number of restrictive assumptions that have been used in various studies many of these assumptions appear hard to justify a priori studies typically estimate the parameters of an equation containing private consumption and government expenditures often assuming that the relevant choice variable for the representative household is an aggregate consumption measure given by the sum of nondurables and services consumption e g aschauer 1985 reid 1985 bean 1986 campbell and mankiw 1990 or the sum of nondurables services and the service flow from durable goods e g kormendi 1983 graham and himarios 1991 this implies that each component of private consumption expenditures is a perfect substitute for the household an assumption for which there is no compelling theoretical basis similarly government expenditures defense nondefense and state and local are typically aggregated e g feldstein 1982 aschauer 1985 reid 1985 graham 1993 with various studies excluding either federal or state and local expenditures just as for private consumption expenditures these aggregation assumptions should be tested rather t han simply imposed in applied work in addition although substitution elasticities are generally not constant in an optimizing framework they are often assumed to be constant in applications by using a single aggregate of consumption or a utility function that imposes a constant elasticity of substitution e g aschauer 1985 and ni 1995 finally none of the above mentioned studies computes elasticities of substitution in a manner consistent with microeconomic utility maximization principles 2 in this article we provide estimates of elasticities of substitution between consumption and government expenditures based on the demand systems approach that has been widely used in testing the neoclassical theory of household behavior see eg deaton and muellbauer 1980 and the survey of barnett et al 1992 this approach has a number of attractive features making it a substantial improvement over the applied studies available in the macroeconomics literature the estimates in this article are based on an optimizing framework where both government and consumption expenditures are treated as choice variables by the representative household

deficits and the demand for money in recent years the large budget deficits of the federal government have renewed interest in the effects of government debt on private sector behavior to date empirical research has focused on the relationship between debt and two key variables consumption and interest rates by contrast empirical research on the effects of government debt on other variables of interest to macroeconomists is limited this paper examines the relationship between government debt and one such variable real money balances the neglect of government debt as a determinant of money demand is surprising many traditional macroeconomic models such as blinder and solow s 9 influential work include government debt as an argument to the money demand function moreover macroeconomic theorists have long been aware that a government debt money demand relationship has important implications for the efficacy of fiscal policy 2 this paper examines the relationship between government debt and real money holdings over the 1950 1990 period a positive money debt relationship was previously noted by butkiewicz 12 and deravi hegji and moberly 15 hereafter referred to as dhm our work improves upon this research in two ways first in contrast to butkiewicz 12 and dhm 15 we investigate the time series properties stationarity cointegration of relevant variables second we distinguish between supply side and demand side explanations of the debt money relationship the explanation advanced by butkiewicz 12 and dhm 15 is that an increase government debt is perceived by the private sector as an increase in net wealth and hence should increase money demand 3 this explanation ignores a potentially important connection between government debt and money supply if the federal reserve monetizes debt and if the private sector s adjustment to this monetization is lagged then debt and real money balances will exhibit a positive correla

government deficits and aggregate demand abstract the evidence presented in this paper indicates that changes in government spending transfers and taxes can have substantial effects on aggregate demand the estimates also indicate that the promise of future social security benefits significantly reduces private saving each the basic implications of the so called ricardian equivalence theorem is contradicted by the data the results are consistent with the more general view of the effects of fiscal actions and fiscal expectations that is described in the paper

the degree of spillovers and the number of rivals for maximum effective r d abstract the amount of cost reduction or effective r d that results in a symmetric sequential nash equilibrium with quadratic payoffs and differentiated goods is shown to increase with spillovers in oligopolies with a few rivals and to achieve a maximum for spillovers that are not perfect in industries with many firms similar tendencies apply for consumer surplus profits and static welfare more rivals typically lead to reduced investments output and profitability while consumer surplus and welfare increase or at least do not decrease limited entry in markets with a few rivals may enhance innovative investments profitability and consumer surplus if only product differentiation and spillovers are sufficiently high and r d costs sufficiently low too many rivals will then again lead to reductions and a decrease in static welfare

the real effects of public investment on private investment one of the main policy questions that emanated from the macro rational expectations literature and the focus of many empirical studies is whether expected government policy has an effect on real output and or whether unanticipated government policy has a permanent effect on real output many of the empirical studies have examined this question directly by testing whether a statistically significant relationship exists between real output or employment and some form of an aggregate demand policy variable the conflicting results of these studies fail to either validate of refute the neutrality proposition a shortcoming of these empirical studies arises because government spending is viewed merely as an additive component of aggregate demand and is therefore modelled on the demand side only if however the productivity of private investment is correlated with aggregate demand policy there will exist supply side effects also another approach to determine any effects of public capital on private c

the interest rate neutrality of fiscal deficits testing for ricardian equivalence and capital inflow abstract this paper examines the extent to which the ricardian equivalence theorem as restated by barro 1974 and the capital inflow hypothesis of dwyer 1985 provide valid explanations of the observed interest rate neutrality of fiscal policy in open economies a theoretical open economy macromodel is specified and subsequently tested on a multi country dataset which spans the recent period of floating exchange rates on balance the empirical results favour the capital inflow hypothesis which emphasizes the importance of international financial integration in facilitating the financing of public deficits by the savings of agents who reside across political frontiers

consumers are not ricardian evidence from nineteen countries i introduction in conventional macroeconomic analysis government debt affects the economy because households view it as net wealth the larger the government debt is the wealthier households feel and the more they consume in principle however households need not view government debt as net wealth david ricardo pointed out that they might conceivably treat the future taxes servicing the government debt as exactly offsetting it 1 robert barro 1974 has shown that maximizing households will actually do so if they accurately anticipate future taxes if they face perfect capital markets and if they have effectively infinite horizons ricardian equivalence is said to hold if households do treat future servicing taxes as an exact offset to the government debt many empirical papers on consumption have investigated whether ricardian equivalence is consistent with observation kochin 1974 barro 1978 tanner 1979 seater 1982 kormendi 1983 aschauer 1985 seater and mariano 1985 kormendi and meguire 1986 1990 leiderman and razin 1988 evans 1988 and evans and hasan 1993 have reported evidence consistent with ricardian equivalence by contrast blinder and deaton 1985 feldstein 1978 1982 boskin and kotlikoff 1985 modigliani and sterling 1986 1990 and feldstein and elmendorf 1990 have reported evidence inconsistent with ricardian equivalence unfortunately most of these studies do not estimate regression equations that derive from well specified theoretical models nesting both ricardian equivalence and an alternative theory in which budget deficits and current taxes are not equivalent consequently their results are often hard to interpret moreover these studies consider the data for only one country typically the united states as a result the tests that are performed may not have much power to distinguish an economy for which ricardian equivalence would be a good approximation from one for which it would be a bad approximation olivier blanchard 1985 has provided one of the few models in the literature that tractably nests ricardian equivalence and an alternative in which households view government debt as net wealth depending upon whether a crucial parameter is zero or positive households have infinite horizons internalize all future generations and exhibit ricardian behavior or have finite horizons are at least somewhat disconnected from future generations and exhibit non ricardian behavior that strengthens as the parameter becomes larger the model has testable implications that this paper examines using annual data for nineteen countries when the data for the countries are pooled the tests have sufficient power not only to reject ricardian equivalence in favor of blanchard s alternative but also to yield a precise estimate of the deviation from ricardian equivalence this estimated deviation is approximately what one would expect if capital and insurance markets were perfect and households did not have altruistic bequest motives the deviation is however also economically unimportant for many purposes the rest of the paper is organized as follows section ii lays out blanchard s model and derives the testable implications of ricardian equivalence section iii tests these implications section iv summarizes the findings of the paper and interprets them ii empirical implications of ricardian equivalence in the stochastic variant of blanchard s model formulated in this section the economy is inhabited by a constant population of households that have finite horizons and face perfect capital and insurance markets 2 each household has a finite horizon because it has a probability p of dying each period and being replaced by another household from which it is entirely disconnected with the population normalized to unity the number of households born 0 1 2 periods earlier is always p p 1 p p 1 p sup

searching for non linear effects of fiscal policy evidence from industrial and developing countries several recent studies suggest that the response of national saving to scal policy may be non linear in this paper we use two data sets to search for the circumstances in which such non linear response may arise a sample of oecd countries already used in previous studies and a sample of developing countries using more recent world bank data we nd that in both samples non linear e ects tend to be associated with large and persistent scal impulses in the oecd sample the non linearity of the response is stronger for scal contractions than for expansions an increase in net taxes has no e ect on national saving during large scal contractions while it has a positive e ect in less pronounced contractions high or rapidly growing public debt does not appear to be a good predictor of non linear e ects in the world bank sample of developing countries non linearities in the response national saving to scal policy are not limited to large scal contractions and also tend to occur in periods in which debt is accumulating rapidly regardless of its initial level 2000 elsevier science b v all rights reserved jel classixcation e21 e62 h31

macroeconomic effects of fiscal adjustment a tale of two approaches abstract we investigate the short term effects of fiscal adjustment on economic activity in 20 oecd countries from 1970 to 2009 we compare two approaches the traditional approach based on changes in cyclically adjusted primary balance capb and the narrative approach based on historical records proponents of the latter argue that it captures discretionary fiscal adjustment more accurately than the traditional approach we propose a new definition of capb that takes account of fluctuations in asset prices and reflects idiosyncratic features of fiscal policy in individual countries using this new definition we find that fiscal adjustments always have contractionary effects on economic activity in the short term we find no evidence of expansionary non keynesian fiscal adjustments spending based fiscal adjustments lead to smaller output losses than tax based fiscal adjustment these results are in line with the literature using the narrative approach suggesting that the capb when correctly specified can be used as a measure of fiscal adjustments

the tax versus debt controversy in a multivariate cointegrating system the empirical literature is replete with evidence that budget deficits and government debt affect traditional view or do not appreciably affect ricardian equivalence private consumption however the validity of the relative empirical estimates can be questioned to the extent that they do not adequately distinguish among countries with varying levels of indebtedness the present paper attempts to address this problem by using johansen s cointegration technique and by sorting the sample countries into groups according to the ratio of debt to gdp the empirical evidence generated finds support for the debt illusion hypothesis as a means of expounding variations in consumers behaviour among countries with varying degrees of indebtedness

payroll taxes and wage inflation the swedish experiences payroll taxes levied on employers have become an increasingly important part of the swedish tax system these taxes including various collective fees agreed on in central wage negotiations amounted to about 6 of the wage bill of private business in 1950 but had reached 40 in the late 1970s payroll tax increases have been quite dramatic during the last decade with tax rates climbing from 14 to 40 attempts to estimate the extent to which payroll tax increases have been directly shifted back onto labor as lower wages are reported in this paper the basic message of the empirical analysis is that payroll tax increases have produced some backward shifting on wages although the shifting appears to be far from complete a onepercent statutory wage cost increase is associated with an actual wage cost increase of about one half of a percent

government debt national income and causality the concept of granger causality is applied to assess the validity of the ricardian equivalence hypothesis the analysis is conducted using a multivariate approach with a us data set consisting of annual observations for the 1919 1981 period the empirical evidence generated by this investigation does not support the strict debt neutrality position

fiscal stabilizations when do they work and why abstract this paper studies the determinants and channels through which fiscal contractions influence the dynamics of the debt to gdp ratio and gdp growth using data from a panel of oecd countries the paper shows that the success of fiscal adjustments in decreasing the debt to gdp ratio depends on the size of the fiscal contraction and less on its composition the rate of growth of output matters too but higher gdp growth does not drive the success of a fiscal stabilization in contrast whether a fiscal adjustment is expansionary depends largely on the composition of the fiscal maneuvre in particular stabilizations implemented by cutting public spending lead to higher gdp growth rates the effects of the composition on growth work mostly through the labor market rather than through agents expectations of future fiscal policy finally the evidence suggests that successful and expansionary fiscal contractions are not the result of accompanying expansionary monetary policy or exchange rate devaluations

financing decisions and the crowding out effect abstract this study empirically assesses the relevance of the crowding out effect in the case of a developing country the philippines the finding of a crowding out effect from the issue of government debt is not due to a lack of rationality

does the public sector obey the rational expectations permanent income hypothesis a multi country study of the time series properties of government expenditures 1989 does the public sector obey the rational expectations permanent income hypothesis a multi country study of the time series properties of government expenditures applied economics vol 21 no 9 pp 1257 1266

aggregate consumption and deficit financing an attempt to separate permanent from transitory effects many previous empirical studies of the ricardian equivalence hypothesis have found a relatively high degree of future tax liability discounting such that current deficits appear to have relatively little or no influence on current consumption demand however the validity of these empirical estimates can be questioned as they may not have adequately distinguished between permanent and transitory income flows this paper attempts to address this problem by using cycle averaging as a simple method of capturing the permanent path of income over time the empirical evidence generated in this paper rejects the strict debt neutrality proposition of the ricardian equivalence hypothesis

imitation costs and patents an empirical study it has long been recognised that the costs of imitating new products have an important effect on the incentives for innovation in a market economy as arrow i962 and others have pointed out if firms can imitate an innovation at a cost that is substantially below the cost to the innovator of developing the innovation there may be little or no incentive for the innovator to carry out the innovation in their discussions of the innovation process economists frequently have called attention to the major role played by the costs of imitation but there has been little or no attempt to measure these costs to test various hypotheses concerning the factors influencing them or to estimate their effects in this paper we report some findings of what seems to be the first study of this topic in addition we present data regarding the effects of patents on imitation costs and on the rate of innovation

is public expenditure productive abstract this paper considers the relationship between aggregate productivity and stock and flow government spending variables the empirical results indicate that i the nonmilitary public capital stock is dramatically more important in determining productivity than is either the flow of nonmilitary or military spending ii military capital bears little relation to productivity and iii a core infrastructure of streets highways airports mass transit sewers water systems etc has most explanatory power for productivity the paper also suggests an important role for the net public capital stock in the productivity slowdown of the last fifteen years

is the ricardian equivalence proposition an aerie fairy theory for europe using a theoretical model based on dynamic optimizing agents we test empirically the ricardian equivalence proposition rep for the eu 15 countries the theoretical setting allows us to obtain estimates of the structural parameters of the model and to test directly the hypothesis implied by the rep using recently developed end of sample cointegration breakdown tests we find evidence of a change in the fiscal behaviour of individuals during the last decade after the introduction of a fiscal rule namely the maastricht criteria for most countries in the sample the results concerning the direction of change are mixed

does ricardian equivalence hold when expectations are not rational this paper considers the ricardian equivalence proposition when expectations are not rational and are instead formed using adaptive learning rules we show that ricardian equivalence continues to hold provided suitable additional conditions on learning dynamics are satisfied however new cases of failure can also emerge under learning in particular for ricardian equivalence to obtain agents expectations must not depend on government s financial variables under deficit financing

ricardian equivalence empirical evidence from developing economies abstract the strong underlying assumptions of the barro ricardo equivalence proposition rep raise doubts on its validity especially for developing countries this paper attempts to analyze the validity of the rep and the sources of deviation from rep for a large sample of developing countries although the results are of a mixed nature they suggest that the presence of liquidity constrained individuals may be the source of deviation from the rep the analysis also indicates that public spending is a poor substitute for private consumption and hence implies that temporary increases in public spending may have some expansionary effect on aggregate demand

effects of government spending on private investment this paper investigates the effects of military and non military public expenditures on gross private investment using cointegration and error correction analysis the latter type of public spending is disagreggated into expenditures of infrastructure consumption and other general government expenditures the empirical evidence from four emerging european countries namely greece ireland portugal and spain suggests that in some cases public capital spending stimulates investment while in others it depresses it also the results tentatively indicate that defence spending exerts no influence on private investment thus adding to the ongoing controversy of the economic effects of military spending

fiscal policy and the term structure abstract this paper investigates the empirical association between deficits in interest rates it extends the results in plosser 1982 to include the more recent experience the association between a measure of ex ante real rates and deficits is also considered the results largely corroborate the previous results first little or no association between real or nominal interest rates and deficits is found second output and to a lesser extent military spending are found to have a significant association with interest rates

the ricardian equivalence hypothesis abstract this paper analyzes the effects of government debt and provides a test of the ricardian equivalence hypothesis for the canadian economy the empirical evidence for the period 1964 ii 1984 iv indicates that the ricardian equivalence hypothesis cannot be rejected

ricardian equivalence and the public and private saving nexus in india abstractthis study tests the ricardian equivalence theorem ret and examines the responsiveness of private saving to public saving in india most estimators do not provide support for the empirical validity of ret and long run cointegration between public and private saving the increases in household saving hhs seem to have been engendered by the provision of saving incentives institution of saving schemes self driven motivation to save and the precautionary accumulations induced by uncovered uncertainties in incomes rather than by ricardian behaviour of households the self imposed aversion to debt and debt bequest borrowing and liquidity constraints and the intertemporal smoothing of consumption have been the added catalysts that contributed to the increases in hhs the households with binding borrowing constraints inadequate or no insurance and uncovered uncertainties in incomes seem to have been saving more to pay for higher inflation tax the fiscal consolidation and generation of public s

new evidence on deficits and interest rates it is generally assumed on theoretical grounds that increases in government borrowing cause interest rates to rise 1 but empirical support for this proposition has been weak at best several recent papers have uncovered no strong relationship between deficits and short terrn interest rates however the research reported here indicates that although the relationship between deficits and short terrn interest rates may be tenuous there is strong evidence that larger deficits are associated with higher long terrn interest rates much of the debate about whether there is a strong relationship between federal borrowing and interest rates concerns the crowding out question this controversy centers on the direct and indirect eilffects of government fiscal actions on private spending these effects have been well documented in the theoretical literature e g buiter 1977 carlson and spencer 1975 blinder and solow 1973 many of the crowding out effects studied in this literature depend on the connection between government borrowing and high interest rates friedman 1978 meyer 1975 silber 1970 this is called short run indirect crowding out and may occur when increases in government spending and borrowing cause interest rates to rise which then may cause private spending to be reduced buiter 1977 pp 310 13

government debt government spending and private sector behavior reply and update the preceding articles by martin feldstein and douglas elmendorf and by franco modigliani and arlhe sterling give us a welcome opportunity to return to the effects of fiscal policy on private consumption at stake in this debate we believe is a potential paradigm change from what kormendi 1983 termed the standard approach which bases private consumption on disposable personal income to what he termed the consolidated approach which bases consumption on aggregate income government spending and transfer payments each with separate effects the standard approach excludes ricardian equivalence a priori the consolidated approach not only incorporates ricardian equivalence but in its augmented form allows one to nest the various hypotheses associated with the two approaches feldstein and elmendorf argue that kormendi s 1983 results and implicitly those of kormendi and meguire 1986 which reject the standard approach in favor of the consolidated ricardian alternative are not robust to the exclusion of data from world war ii and other specification changes modigliani and sterling argue that accounting for temporary taxes reverses our rebuttal of their 1986 comment we first take up the challenge of feldstein and elmendorf before turning to modigliani and sterling we then assess the validity of our preference for estimating in differences by testing whether consumption income and the fiscal variables are cointegrated finally we summarize what can be learned from the debate i feldstein and elmendorf

asymmetry in the effects of monetary and government spending shocks contrasting evidence and implications magda kandil 1 introduction recent research on business cycles has produced evidence that demonstrates the asymmetric effects of monetary shocks on economic variables 1 specifically the effect of expansionary monetary shocks on economic variables may be different from that of contractionary shocks the empirical evidence has stimulated efforts to provide an adequate theoretical explanation to the observed asymmetry sources of asymmetry have varied sharply in the theoretical literature primary explanations may be classified into supply side and demand side sources of asymmetry a strand of the theoretical literature has viewed asymmetry of economic fluctuations to be a supply side phenomenon demand shifts along a kinked supply curve are likely to produce varying effects on the economy as to the explanation of the kinked shape of the supply curve competing models offer explanations in one direction some have explained the asymmetric shape of the supply curve by conditions in the labor market this possibility arises in the context of models that advocate the contractual nominal wage rigidity explanation of business cycles the stipulation of wage contracts may allow for asymmetric wage indexation for example if wages are more responsive to expansionary demand shocks compared to contractionary shocks asymmetric wage indexation is consistent with a kinked supply curve in labor and output markets consequently expansionary demand shocks are likely to move the economy along a steeper supply curve 2 alternatively supply side asymmetry may be attributed to conditions in the p roduct market that differentiate price adjustment in the upward and downward directions faced with menu costs firms may be inclined for more frequent and larger adjustments of prices in the upward compared to the downward direction this possibility also is consistent with a steeper supply curve in the face of positive demand shocks compared to negative shocks 3 another line of the theoretical explanations of asymmetric economic fluctuations has emphasized possible asymmetry on the demand side of the economy conditions in the money and or goods markets may differentiate the response of aggregate demand to positive and negative shocks 4 this possibility differentiates the size of aggregate demand shifts in the face of expansionary and contractionary shocks in the absence of supply side asymmetry demand side asymmetry differentiates the severity of economic fluctuations in the face of positive and negative shocks the primary difference between demand side and supply side explanations concerns the output and inflationary effects in response to asymmetry supply side asymmetry produces a trade off between the asymmetric effects of demand shocks on output and their inflationary effects on wages and or prices the response of output growth is larger in the face of demand contraction compared to expansion concurrently the inflationary effect of demand shifts exceeds the deflationary effect on nominal wage and or price in contrast demand side asymmetry produces a positive correlation between the asymmetric effects of demand shocks on real output growth and nominal wage and price inflation that is larger output contraction relative to expansion correlates with smaller inflation relative to deflation of the nominal wage and price in the face of demand shocks the purpose of this investigation is to contrast asymmetry on the demand and supply sides in the face of two specific demand shocks monetary and government spending shocks demand and or supply conditions may differentiate the expansionary and contractionary effects of monetary and fiscal policies the article s analysis will highlight the specifics of this asymmetry the empirical evidence sheds some light on potential explanations of this asymmetry as follows conditions in the credit market and the behavior of ricardian consumers may differentiate the effects of expansionary and contractionary government spending shocks on aggregate demand

an empirical analysis on the substitutability between private consumption and government purchases abstract this paper estimates substitutability of government purchases for private consumption using an optimal consumption model the utility function features several types of nonseparabilities the paper finds that gmm estimates are affected by the specification of nonseparability between private consumption and government purchases by the restriction of time separability and by the measurement of real interest rates

the u s budget and trade deficits a simultaneous equation model the large and apparently persistent u s trade deficit has sparked a considerable amount of research into its determinants and the proper policy responses at least two key questions can be identified in this context a general one and a more specific one first to what extent can the trade deficit be explained by changes in macroeconomic fundamentals as opposed to microeconomic explanations such as quality deterioration of u s goods and the like second to what extent and through which channels does the federal budget deficit affect the trade deficit if at all most recent macroeconomic studies on the u s trade deficit have focused on mono causal

fiscal policy and private investment expenditure a study of australia and the united states the effect of government spending on private sector s investment and profitability is examined within the context of an open economy macro model the empirical results of the study indicate that the private investment expenditure in australia and the united states is crowed out by government investment and government consumption respectively these results are in conflict with the hypothesis of fiscal neutrality in addition the empirical results of corporate profitability provide no support for the complementary relationship between public and private investment expenditure

public goods merit goods and the relation between private and government consumption in this paper we investigate the relation between public and private consumption by constructing a general government spending data set by function for 12 european countries in particular we split government consumption into two categories the 1rst category public goods includes defence public order and justice the second category merit goods includes health education and other services that could have been provided privately equations from a relatively general permanent income model are estimated by gmm the estimates are fairly robust in showing that public goods substitute while merit goods complement private consumption however the relation between merit goods and private goods turns out to be stronger than that between public goods and private goods thus in the aggregate government and private consumption are complements c