an interest group model of direct income redistribution an interest group model of the determinants of policies which directly re distribute income to low income persons is developed and tested the model assum es that altruistic taxpayers nonaltruistic taxpayers and needy beneficiaries f orm separate interest groups from which politicians seek support benefit levels depend on variables such as taxpayer income and the price of benefits but unlike median voter models the model also implies a role for interest group strengt h and competition between political parties the author uses latent variable met hods and data on the aid to families with dependent children program to demonstr ate empirical support forthe model copyright 1986 by mit press

income redistribution in a common labor market when households are mobile among jurisdictions income redistribution by individual jurisdictions creates fiscal externalities a model of interjurisdictional migration is used to study the nature of this redistributive externality analysis of optimal redistribution and optimal corrective subsidies from higher level governments shows that benefit levels for the recipients of income transfers and tax rates on mobile taxpayers should be equalized across jurisdictions a system of jurisdictions with a common labor market can achieve welfare improvements through coordination of domestic redistributive policy or through the intervention of a higher level government copyright 1991 by american economic association

macroeconomic policy in a two party system as a repeated game this paper considers the interaction of two parties with different objectives concerning inflation and unemployment and rational and forward looking wage setters if discretionary policies are followed an economic cycle related to the political cycle results in equilibrium this cycle is significantly different from the traditional political business cycle reputational mechanisms due to the repeated interaction of the two parties and the public or commitments to a common policy rule can improve upon the discretionary outcome by reducing or eliminating the magnitude of the economic fluctuations

cooperation through imitation abstract this paper characterizes long run outcomes for broad classes of symmetric games when players select actions on the basis of average historical performance received wisdom suggests that when agent s interests are partially opposed behavior is excessively competitive keeping up with the jones lowers everyones welfare here we study the long run consequences of imitative behavior when agents have sufficiently long memories and evaluate past actions in terms of weighted average payoff imitation robustly leads to cooperative outcomes with highest symmetric payoffs in the long run furthermore lengthening memory reinforces this effect this provides a rationale for example for collusive cartel like behavior without collusive intent

election campaigns agenda setting and electoral outcomes framing effects and bounded rationality imply that election campaigns may be an important determinant of election outcomes this paper uses a two party setting and simple game theoretic models to analyse the strategic interaction between the parties campaign decisions alternations of power emerge naturally even if both electoral preferences and party positions remain constant

migration and income redistribution responsibilities this study examines whether afdc benefits determine or discourage state to state migration flows in the united states a pooled cross section time series model is developed to estimate afdc benefits in a state and recipients and whether benefits in one state affect benefits in other states a second model using data from the 1980 census and the panel study of income dynamics estimates migration of afdc recipients and the level of benefits in in migration and out migration states both models indicate that small but statistically significant amounts of migration occur which may be quite important but only in the long run movers although small in number are much more likely to move to a state with higher benefits states perceive this migration as important indicating that states should have less control and the federal government more control over income redistribution

the effect of welfare and wage levels on the location decisions of female headed households abstract this paper develops and estimates a model designed to calculate the impact of welfare benefit levels wages and tax rates on the location choices of female headed households the empirical model assumes that women simultaneously choose both where they will live and whether or not they will participate in the welfare system based on their expected income and expected hours of work for each location participation possibility these income and hours expectations depend in turn on the welfare benefits wage and tax rates facing each household in each location it is found that both regional welfare levels and wage rates have a significant effect on the location decisions of this population the probability of a typical female headed household with little outside income leaving an area with low welfare payments and low wages can be as much as 12 points higher over a 4 year period than the probability of leaving a high welfare high wage area

the vp function a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years vp functions explain the support for the government at votes and polls by economic and political variables most studies analyze macro time series we also cover studies of individual voters socio economic groups and regional cross sections the theory starts from the responsibil ity hypothesis voters hold the government responsible for economic conditions it works in two party block systems but not else voters in most countries are found to be sociotropic egotropic voting also occurs voters myopia is well established voting is retrospective as expectations are static it costs the average government almost 2 of the vote to rule

political business cycles and macroeconomic credibility a survey there is clear evidence that government popularity and election performance is affected in part by economic performance suggesting that governments may manipulate the economy to political advantage simple models incorporating adaptive expectations which allowed the government to exploit this relationship were developed in the 1970s but fell out of fashion with the advent of new classical economics however modern theories of the political business cycle which are closely related to the macroeconomic policy game literature assume rational expectations and lead to forms of political business cycle driven by the existence of uncertainty of one type or another the international evidence suggests that some aspects of the theories apply although definitive conclusions are as we might expect hard to come by

the cost of ruling cabinet duration and the median gap model in a recent article paldam and skott 1995 provide atheoretical explanation for an important empirical phenomenonin democratic countries incumbent governments tend to losevotes in this paper i show that paldam and skott stheoretical explanation for this cost of ruling ispotentially much stronger than they recognize specifically when generalized in a straightforward way their modelexplains not only the cost of ruling itself but also a secondwell established empirical fact that the longer an incumbentgovernment has been in power the more votes it loses further this generalization of the model produces twoadditional empirical hypotheses that have not yet been testedin the empirical literature

a rational voter explanation of the cost of ruling it is well known that the average government loses votes the so called cost of ruling we show that the loss can be explained as a perfectly rational demand for change in a median voter model once the model is amended to let the two parties be visibly different

a theory of divided government this paper extends the spatial theory of voting to an institutional structure in which policy choices depend upon not only the executive but also the composition of the legislature voters have incentives to be strategic since policy reflects the outcome of a simultaneous election of the legislature and the executive and since the legislature s impact on policy depends upon relative plurality to analyze equilibrium in this game between voters we apply coalition proof type refinements the model has several testable implications which are consistent with voting behavior in the united states for instance the model predicts a split tickets where some voters vote for one party for president and the other for congress b for some parameter values a divided government with different parties controlling the executive and the majority of the legislature and c the midterm electoral cycle with the party holding the presidency always losing votes in midterm congressional elections

the evolution of walrasian behavior consider an evolutionary context where a given number of quantity setting oligopolists tend to mimic successful behavior occasionally experimenting with some small probability in this context it is shown that the unique long run outcome of the process has all firms playing walrasian i e choosing an output that maximizes profits when taking the market clearing price as given

cournot competition imitation and information networks abstract we develop a stochastic learning model of cournot competition on arbitrary networks where firms can only observe local information and imitate the locally best the walrasian equilibrium is uniquely selected for any connected information network

cournot vs walras a reappraisal through simulations abstract best reply behavior in cournot oligopolies generally leads to cournot nash equilibrium but imitative behavior selects the walrasian equilibrium as the unique stochastically stable state previous work alos ferrer 2004 showed that in the presence of memory imitative behavior leads to a non trivial dynamics selecting all quantities between the cournot and walrasian outcomes however the scope of previous results was limited to specific assumptions on demand and cost functions and did not provide information on the shape of the distribution of outcomes we use computational simulations to address these limitations we show that the selection result for non trivial memory holds beyond the set of well behaved cournot games previously analyzed further we find that in cournot games the limit distribution of long run outcomes is highly skewed towards the walrasian quantity although longer memory increases the importance of the cournot equilibrium the competitive outcome remains the dominant prediction

inter country differences in voter satisfaction with the democratic process a study of world elections using data from the comparative study of electoral systems this paper examines differences between west and east european countries in their levels of satisfaction with the way democracy works compared to east european countries satisfaction levels were considerably higher in western countries west europe north america and oceania moreover there was considerably greater inequality in the distribution of satisfaction in east european compared to western countries when these facts were combined to construct equity sensitive satisfaction averages the gap between western countries and east european countries was even greater than suggested by a comparison of average satisfaction levels this raised the question of why satisfaction levels varied so markedly between these two sets of countries a logit model suggested that a number of factors were important for determining whether people were satisfied with the way democracy worked in their countries while there was a difference between western countries and east european countries in their endowments of these satisfaction inducing factors income gender participation education among others when the equations were estimated separately for the western countries and east european countries the coefficient responses associated with several of these factors also differed markedly between the two groups

altruists egoists and hooligans in a local interaction model the authors study a population of agents each of whom can be an altruist or an egoist altruism is a strictly dominated strategy agents choose their actions by imitating others who earn high payoffs interactions between agents are local so that each agent affects and is affected by only his neighbors altruists can survive in such a world if they are grouped together so that the benefits of altruism are enjoyed primarily by other altruists who then earn relatively high payoffs and are imitated altruists continue to survive in the presence of mutations that continually introduce egoists into the population copyright 1998 by american economic association

through trial and error to collusion in this article we study a very simple trial and error learning process in the context of a cournot oligopoly without any knowledge of the payoff functions players increase respectively decrease their quantity as long as this leads to higher profits we show that despite the absence of any coordination or punishing device this process converges to the joint profit maximizing outcome

the effects of grants in aid on state and local expenditures abstract this paper develops econometric methods to estimate the effect of the piecewise linear budget constraints created by grant formulas in which the subsidy rate is not constant over expenditures e g closed end grants the methods are applied to the afdc program the results show that because of the kinked nature of the grant formula 1 the present federal formula actually increases cross state inequality in afdc benefits 2 several subsidy rates in the formula actually reduce benefits and 3 the so called flypaper effect disappears

games the states don t play welfare benefits and the theory of fiscal federalism fiscal federalism theory predicts that states will behave strategically in welfare programs because voter demand for welfare is sensitive to tax price while the tax price itself changes because of welfare induced migration this paper tests these propositions on afdc in the united states for a panel from 1982 88 using new models for the determination of the recipiency ratio the tax price and composite neighbors the data do not support any substantial tax price elasticity of demand for welfare estimates of migration effects on tax price are found to be sensitive to specification copyright 1995 by mit press

politics and business cycles in industrial democracies politics alberto alesina influences from political competition on macroeconomic policy are often thought to be a source of economic fluctuations politicians are described as being driven by two not mutually exclusive main motivations they want to be reelected and they harbour political or ideological biases when such theories are confronted with actual cycles in a number of industrial countries the pattern of inflation unemployment output and budget deficits indicates that partisan policy making is a fairly widespread phenomenon with more limited evidence that electoral preoccupations result in major fluctuations the combination of partisanship and electoral cycles may easily result in socially undesirable outcomes in particular the degree of politico institutional stability and the independence of the central bank have a bearing on macroeconomic outcomes these observations raise a number of important questions about the design of political institutions

policy mis representation and the cost of ruling u s presidential elections in comparative perspective the cost of ruling effect on electoral support is well established that is governing parties tend to lose vote share the longer they are in power although we know this to be true we do not know why it happens this research examines whether the cost of ruling results at least in part from the tendency for governing parties to shift policy further away from the average voter it first considers differences in political institutions and how they might influence cost of ruling owing to policy drift and then tests the hypothesis focusing on u s presidential elections which is an unfavorable case to find such an effect results confirm a clear cost of ruling effect in these elections and demonstrate that policy misrepresentation is an important mechanism that is the policy liberalism of presidents from different parties diverges over time as their tenure in the white house increases and the degree to which it does matters for the presidential vote policy is not the only thing that matters and other

efficient equilibrium selection in evolutionary games with random matching abstract this paper investigates the sensitivity of recent evolutionary models of learning to the specification of the matching mechanism we study a literally random matching mechanism combined with a process of strategy adjustment based on the realized average performance of each strategy in the key class of symmetric 2 2 coordination games the pareto efficient equilibrium per se is selected rather than the risk dominant equilibrium as the probability of experimentation or mutation goes to zero furthermore convergence to the equilibrium is relatively fast we extend these results for example to games of common interest journal of economic literature classification numbers c72 c73

cournot versus walras in dynamic oligopolies with memory abstract this paper explores the impact of memory in cournot oligopolies where firms learn through imitation of success as suggested in alchian j polit econ 57 1950 211 and modeled in vega redondo econometrica 65 1997 375 as long as memory includes at least one period the long run outcome corresponds to any quantity between the cournot one and the walras one the evolutionary stability of the walrasian outcome relies on interfirm comparisons of simultaneously observed profits i e whether a firm earns more than others in a given period whereas the stability of the cournot nash equilibrium is derived from intertemporal comparisons of profits for each given firm i e whether a deviation pays off for that firm