taxation of outbound direct investment economic principles and tax policy considerations this paper reviews economic principles for optimality of the taxation of international profit from both a global and national perspective it argues that for traditional systems based on the residence of the investor or the source of the income nothing less than full harmonisation across countries can achieve global optimality the conditions for national optimality are more difficult to identify but are most likely to imply source based taxation however source based taxation requires an allocation of the profits of multinational companies to individual jurisdictions this is not only very difficult in practice but in some cases is without any conceptual foundation the taxation of interest income on a residence basis is also hard to justify if the aim of the tax system is to tax only the income arising from economic activity in a given country

conglomerates and regulation conglomerates operating integrated productions in different regulated and unregulated sectors may benefit of scope economies however the precise size of these synergies is often unknown to both rival firms and regulators we show that the conglomerate s private information on scope economies may negatively affect both the regulated and the unregulated sectors depending on the precise nature of competition strategic substitutes or complements we also unveil a novel effect of regulation that involves an informational externality to the conglomerate s rivals notwithstanding these complications and independently of the nature of competition we show that in our model it is desirable as for welfare to let the firm run integrated productions unless diseconomies of scope may realize jel l51 l43 l52

regulating horizontal diversification abstract this paper investigates the optimal design of diversification rules for regulated enterprises diversification generates profit in non core markets that can be shared with core customers however a diversified firm may divert its attention and effort to non core operations causing consumer welfare in core markets to decline diversification generally results in lower prices and higher powered reward structures in core markets surprisingly diversification is not always directed into the non core markets where the expected contribution of the regulated firm is most pronounced furthermore diversification may be permitted more often as the potential losses from effort diversion increase

regulatory risk vertical integration and upstream investment abstract we investigate the impact of regulatory risk on vertical integration and upstream investment by a regulated firm that provides an essential input to downstream competitors regulatory risk reflects uncertainty about the regulator s commitment to a regulatory policy that promotes the regulated firm s noncontractible investment we show that when the regulator sets the regulatory policy after the vertical industry structure has been established some degree of regulatory risk is ex ante socially beneficial regulatory risk makes vertical integration profitable and stimulates high upstream investment at a lower social cost this occurs for moderate costs of high investment and firms small risk aversion our analysis sheds new light on some relevant empirical patterns in vertically related markets

cost raising strategies advantage rivals by raising their costs in this paper we show that strategies designed to raise rivals costs have a number of advantages over predatory pricing they are credible do not necessarily require the victim to exit and do not necessarily require the existence of classical market power the paper sets up a general model proves a number of general results and then applies the model to specific strategies involving overbuying inputs and vertical integration

free entry and social inefficiency our goal is to provide a simple yet general exposition of the conditions under which the number of entrants in a free entry equilibrium is excessive insufficient or optimal our analysis compares the number of firms that enter a market when there is free entry with the number that would be desired by a social planner who is unable to control the behavior of firms once they are in the market that is we consider the second best problem of choosing the welfare maximizing number of firms while we take as given their noncompetitive behavior after entry we demonstrate that the crucial conditions for establishing the presence of an entry bias can be stated quite simply in terms of the outcome of the postentry game played by entrants in contrast to previous work we do not need to model this postentry game explicitly

access pricing and competition abstract in many industries electricity telecommunications railways the network can be described as a natural monopoly a central issue is how to combine the necessary regulation of the network with the organization of competition in activities which use the network as an input and are potentially competitive generation of electricity value added services road transportation in this paper we derive access pricing formulas in the framework of an optimal regulation under incomplete information first we study how access pricing formulas take into account the fixed costs of the network and the incentive constraints of the natural monopoly over the network second we examine the difficulties coming from the accounting impossibility to disentangle costs of the network and costs of the monopoly s competitive goods third the analysis is extended to the cases where governmental transfers are prohibited where the competitors have market power and where competitors are not regulated fourth the possibility some consumers bypass the network is taken into account finally the role of access pricing for inducing the best market structure is assessed the conclusion summarizes our results and suggests avenues of further research

the organization and scope of agents regulating multiproduct industries abstract a mechanism design problem with two dimensional uncertainty is solved to derive the optimal policy for regulating a monopolist with private information about the marginal cost of producing two different goods the paper establishes that informational economies of scope or incentive complementarities arise when one firm produces both goods the regulator should weigh these economies against the benefits of relative performance incentives when choosing between integrated and decentralized organizations unless the marginal costs of the two products are sufficiently positively correlated the optimal ex ante policy gives control of both markets to a single firm journal of economic literature classification number s d82 l22 l51

marketable emission permits efficiency profitability and substitutability research on marketable emission rights as a mechanism for controlling pollutants in the environment has intensified in recent years the resurgence of interest in this mechanism is in no small measure due to the 1990 amendments of the u s clean air act which introduced the most comprehensive tradeable permit scheme to date for s02 emissions canada is also flirting with the possibility of following suit with for instance the government of ontario now allowing ontario hydro to conduct some limited emissions trading across its plants nera 1992 however the literature often ignores two basic questions how permits are allocated and what substances should be covered by the permits there are two ways of allocating pollution permits by selling them e g by auction or by giving them away the advantages of auctions are that they can generate sizeable revenues for the regulator and they conform to the widely endorsed principle of polluter pays a frequently cited problem with auctions however is that they impose immediate financial burdens on emitting firms in the absence of perfect capital markets these burdens erect a formidable entry barrier to new and existing firms thus permits are usually freely distributed on the basis of historical market share however by allocating permits gratis policy makers are ignoring both the important polluter pays principle as well as an important source of revenue generation for example should emission permits be used to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions in accordance with recent canadian government proclamations the total value of these permits in ontario alone could be as much as c 300 million nera 1992 in this paper we examine the effects on efficiency and the burden imposed on heterogeneous firms from rent capture when permits are allocated gratis

access to bottleneck inputs under oligopoly a prisoners dilemma we analyze the incentives of vertically integrated oligopolists to concede access to their bottleneck inputs to an entrant in the downstream market first two vertically integrated incumbents make access price offers to an entrant that chooses which one to accept if any second firms compete on salop s circle the firms may be asymmetrically located on the circle to reflect differences in consumer shares for some levels of asymmetry the incumbents face a prisoners dilemma with respect to conceding access to their bottleneck inputs entry by a downstream firm may lead to lower retail prices however entry may also lead to higher retail prices for the access provider and for the entrant we also consider the cases where there are several incumbents and where the entrant makes the access price offers

using cost observation to regulate firms the paper emphasizes the use of accounting data in regulatory or procurement contracts when the supplier 1 has superior information about the cost of the project and 2 invests in cost reduction the main result states that under risk neutrality the supplier announces an expected cost and is given an incentive contract linear in cost overruns this optimal contract moves toward a fixed price contract as the announced cost decreases an investment choice is then introduced and the use of a rate of return regulation is studied

entry barriers and economic welfare the relationship between economic welfare and the number of firms in a quasi cournot market is examined in the first place we presuppose the existence of a strong first best government that can enforce the marginal cost principle to the firms along with regulating the number of firms it is shown that there exist excessive number of firms at the free entry quasicournot equilibrium vis a vis the first best welfare maximizing number of firms the thrust of this result essentially survives even if we replace a utopian first best government by a secondbest government that leaves the firms to pursue their respective profit maximization freely and engages solely in regulating the number of firms it can be shown that the excess entry prevails again in this second best world recent studies in the theoretical industrial organization literature have uncovered several instances which cast serious doubt on the reasonableness of a widespread belief that increasing competition will increase welfare stiglitz 1981 p 184 it has been shown that there are cases which are not altogether unreasonable where social welfare will be increased by strengthening rather than weakening the protection of incumbent firms from the threat of potential entry this is in sharp contrast with the traditional belief 2 what is not known however is how robust these pathologies in fact are we intend to settle this problem by proving two excess entry theorems in the quasi cournot parametric conjectural variations homogeneous oligopoly model seade 1980a b in the first place we presuppose the existence of a strong first best government that could costlessly enforce the marginal cost pricing principle by firms in an oligopolistic market and regulate entry in pursuit of first best social welfare optimization it is shown that the number of firms at the free entry equilibrium exceeds the first best welfare optimizing number of firms the result has already been noted by von weizsacker 1980a b and others in terms of numerical examples our theorem 1 asserts that this phenomenon always holds true for the family of quasi cournot models at hand an implication of this result is that the existence of entry barriers which protect incumbent firms from potential competitors is not necessarily welfare decreasing in sharp contrast with the traditional belief a problem remains with theorem 1 however in that an omnipotent first best government does not exist in reality and the first best ideal is unrealizable in the actual economy therefore even if the intervention by a first best government with a view to restricting the number of firms within an industry may be welfare improving it does

equilibrium vertical foreclosure the authors formulate a complete but analytically simple equilibrium model of vertical mergers to evaluate the logic of standard vertical foreclosure claims and the criticisms made of those claims the model includes incentives of the integrated firm and unintegrated input suppliers to exclude rivals and the potential holdout problem in this fully specified model vertical foreclosure can emerge in equilibrium copyright 1990 by american economic association

second best pricing of publicly produced inputs the case of downstream imperfect competition abstract efficient second best pricing is examined for a public enterprise facing two distortions a profit constraint and imperfect competition among some customer industries we suggest a measure of downstream industry distortion for the purpose of efficient pricing the pricing rule contains two opposing elements the shadow value of public profit and this measure of the downstream distortion whose sum determines whether the efficient second best input price is above or below marginal cost efficient pricing normally implies relative subsidization of imperfectly competitive downstream firms

horizontal and vertical integration in securities trading and settlement this paper addresses a very european issue the consolidation of securities trading and settlement infrastructures in a two country model we analyze welfare implications of different types of consolidation we find that in our model full technical horizontal integration of settlement systems is better than vertical integration of exchanges and settlement systems but vertical integration is still better than no consolidation these findings have clear policy implications with regards to the highly fragmented european securities infrastructure

regulation competition and liberalization in many countries throughout the world regulators are struggling to determine whether and how to introduce competition into regulated industries this essay examines the complexities involved in the liberalization process while stressing the importance of case specific analyses this essay distinguishes liberalization policies that generally are procompetitive from corresponding anticompetitive liberalization policies

competition and regulation in vertically related markets in an industry where naturally monopolistic and competitive activities are vertically related should the natural monopolist be allowed also to operate in the deregulated competitive sector unlike much of the literature on vertical integration this paper assumes that monopoly pricing behaviour is regulated and therefore the effect of vertical integration on the task of regulation is central to the analysis in the model there is both imperfect information and imperfect competition when vertical integration by the monopolist is allowed the regulator s task is made harder insofar as the monopolist has anticompetitive incentives to raise rivals costs on the other hand integration may lead to there being fewer firms in the deregulated sector and hence less duplication of fixed costs the overall welfare comparison between separation and integration is ambiguous as two simple examples illustrate various extensions to the analysis are also considered one of the central questions in debates on regulatory reform is how to organize industries that contain both naturally monopolistic and potentially competitive activities electricity transmission and distribution are characterized by natural monopoly cost conditions but electricity generation is not in the gas industry pipeline services may be naturally monopolistic but supply to larger customers is not in telecommunications natural monopoly is more a feature of local network operations than of long distance operations and is not present in apparatus manufacture and supply or in the provision of value added services in railways while the infrastructure of track and stations is naturally monopolistic the supply of train services might not be policy developments notably those associated with privatization in britain and deregulation in the united states have sometimes led to radical structural reform in these industries at t for decades a vertically integrated monopolist was required under the 1982 settlement of its long running antitrust case against the u s government to divest itself of its local network operations the central electricity generating board cegb in england and wales was restructured both vertically transmission grid activities were separated from generation and horizontally before privatization in 1990 1991 by contrast british telecom was privatized as a vertically integrated dominant firm bt now faces competition from mercury and others especially in the long distance market but its dominance of local network operations might affect competition there and in other areas such as apparatus supply the local network monopoly would of course have to be regulated in any event but its link via ownership to vertically related and potentially competitive activities poses additional regulatory questions many of the efforts of the regulatory body oftel notably in relation to interconnection between bt s and rivals 1 for a general account of the theory and british experience of regulatory reform in the utility industries

competition in multiechelon assembly supply chains in this paper we study competition in multiechelon supply chains with an assembly structure firms in the supply chain are grouped into homogenous sectors nodes that contain identical firms with identical production capabilities that all produce exactly one undifferentiated product that may itself be a kit of components each sector may use several inputs to produce its product and these inputs are supplied by different sectors the production process within any sector is taken to be pure assembly in fixed proportions the number of firms in each sector is known the demand curve for the final product is assumed to be linear as are production costs in all sectors competition is modeled via a coordinated successive cournot model in which firms choose production quantities for their downstream market so as to maximize profits given prices for all inputs and all complementary products production quantities for sectors supplying the same successor are coordinated through pricing mechanisms so that complementary products are produced in the right proportions under these assumptions equilibrium prices for any multiechelon assembly network are characterized by a system of linear equations we derive closed form expressions for equilibrium quantities and prices in any two stage system i e a system with multiple input sectors and a single assembly sector we show that any assembly structure can be converted to an equivalent larger structure in which no more than two components are assembled at any node finally large structures can be solved either by direct solution of the characteristic linear equations or through an iterative reduction compression to smaller structures

competition and structure in serial supply chains with deterministic demand supply chains often consist of several tiers with different numbers of firms competing at each tier a major determinant of the structure of supply chains is the cost structure associated with the underlying manufacturing process in this paper we examine the impact of fixed and variable costs on the structure and competitiveness of supply chains with a serial structure and price sensitive linear deterministic demand the entry stage is modeled as a simultaneous game where the players take the outcomes of the subsequent post entry cournot competition into account in making their entry decisions we derive expressions for prices and production quantities as functions of the number of entrants at each tier of a multitier chain we characterize viability and stability of supply chain structures and show using lattice arguments that there is always an equilibrium structure in pure strategies in the entry game finally we examine the effects of vertical integration in the two tier case altogether the paper provides a framework for comparing a variety of supply chain structures and for studying how they are affected by cost structures and by the number of entrants throughout the chain

regulating a monopolist with unknown costs we consider the problem of how to regulate a monopolistic firm whose costs are unknown to the regulator the regulator s objective is to maximize a linear social welfare function of the consumers surplus and the firm s profit in the optimal regulatory policy prices and subsidies are designed as functions of the firm s cost report so that expected social welfare is maximized subject to the constraints that the firm has nonnegative profit and has no incentive to misrepresent its costs we explicitly derive the optimal policy and analyze its properties in their classic papers dupuit 2 and hotelling 5 considered pricing policies for a bridge that had a fixed cost of construction and zero marginal cost they demonstrated that the pricing policy that maximizes consumer well being is to set price equal to marginal cost and to provide a subsidy to the supplier equal to the fixed cost so that a firm would be willing to provide the bridge this first best solution is based on a number of informational assumptions first the demand function is assumed to be known to both the regulator and to the firm while the assumption of complete information may be too strong the assumption that information about demand is as available to the regulator as it is to the firm does not seem unnatural a second informational assumption is that the regulator has complete information about the cost of the firm or at least has the same information about cost as does the firm this assumption is unlikely to be met in reality since the firm would be expected to have better information about costs than would the regulator as weitzman has stated an essential feature of the regulatory environment i am trying to describe is uncertainty about the exact specification of each firm s cost function in most cases even the managers and engineers most closely associated with production will be unable to precisely specify beforehand the cheapest way to generate various hypothetical output levels because they are yet removed from the production process the regulators are likely to be vaguer still about a firm s cost function 12 p 684 as this observation suggests it is natural to expect that a firm would have better information regarding its costs than would a regulator the purpose of this paper is to develop an optimal regulatory policy for the case in which the regulator does not know the costs of the firm one strategy that a regulator could use in the absence of full information about costs is to give the firm the title to the total social surplus and to delegate the pricing decision to the firm in pursuing its own interests which would then be to maximize the total social surplus the firm would adopt the same marginal cost pricing strategy that the regulator would have imposed if the regulator had

the optimal vertical structure in the electricity industry when the incumbent has a cost advantage abstract this paper studies how the vertical structure of the electricity industry affects the social welfare when the incumbent has a cost advantage in generation relative to the entrants the model consists of a generation sector and a transmission sector in the generation sector the incumbent and entrants compete in a cournot fashion taking as given the access charge to the transmission network set in advance by the regulator to maximize the social welfare two vertical structures integration and separation are considered under vertical separation the transmission network is established as an organization independent of every generator whereas under vertical integration it is a part of the incumbent s organization the optimal vertical structure is shown to depend on the number of entrants if the number of entrants is smaller than a certain threshold vertical separation is superior in welfare to vertical integration and vice versa this is because the choice of vertical structure produces a trade off in the effects on competition promotion and production efficiency if a break even constraint is imposed in the transmission sector however vertical integration is shown to be always superior in welfare