Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #642641. 	[Title] Bayesian Analysis of Agricultural Field Experiments [Abstract] SUMMARY The paper describes Bayesian analysis for agricultural field experiments, a topic that has received very little previous attention, despite a vast frequentist literature. Adoption of the Bayesian paradigm simplifies the interpretation of the results, especially in ranking and selection. Also, complex formulations can be analyzed with comparative ease, using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. A key ingredient in the approach is the need for spatial representations of the unobserved fertility patterns. This is discussed in detail. Problems caused by outliers and by jumps in fertility are tackled via hierarchical-t formulations that may find use in other contexts. The paper includes three analyses of variety trials for yield and one example involving binary data; none is entirely straightforward. Some comparisons with frequentist analyses are made. The datasets are available at http://www.stat.duke.edu/~higdon/trials/data.html. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #645088. 	[Title] Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Mapping of Disease Rates [Abstract] Maps of regional morbidity and mortality rates are useful tools in determining spatial patterns of disease. Combined with socio-demographic census information, they also permit assessment of environmental justice, i.e., whether certain subgroups suffer disproportionately from certain diseases or other adverse effects of harmful environmental exposures. Bayes and empirical Bayes methods have proven useful in smoothing crude maps of disease risk, eliminating the instability of estimates in low-population areas while maintaining geographic resolution. In this paper we extend existing hierarchical spatial models to account for temporal effects and spatio-temporal interactions. Fitting the resulting highly-parametrized models requires careful implementation of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, as well as novel techniques for model evaluation and selection. We illustrate our approach using a dataset of county-specific lung cancer rates in the state of Ohio during the period 1968-1988. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #153063. 	[Title] Bayesian Forecasting of Multinomial Time Series through Conditionally Gaussian Dynamic Models [Abstract] Claudia Cargnoni is with the Dipartimento Statistico, Universita di Firenze, 50100 Firenze, Italy. Peter Muller is Assistant Professor, and Mike West is Professor, in the Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences at Duke University, Durham NC 27708-0251. Research of Cargnoni was performed while visiting ISDS during 1995. Muller and West were partially supported by NSF under grant DMS-9305699. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1131277. 	[Title] Bayesian Detection of Clusters and Discontinuities in Disease Maps [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #645084. 	[Title] Modelling Risk from a Disease in Time and Space [Abstract] This paper combines existing models for longitudinal and spatial data in a hierarchical Bayesian framework, with particular emphasis on the role of time- and space-varying covariate effects. Data analysis is implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. The methodology is illustrated by a tentative re-analysis of Ohio lung cancer data 1968-88. Two approaches that adjust for unmeasured spatial covariates, particularly tobacco consumption, are described. The first includes random effects in the model to account for unobserved heterogeneity; the second adds a simple urbanization measure as a surrogate for smoking behaviour. The Ohio dataset has been of particular interest because of the suggestion that a nuclear facility in the southwest of the state may have caused increased levels of lung cancer there. However, we contend here that the data are inadequate for a proper investigation of this issue. fl Email: leo@stat.uni-muenchen.de Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #642641 has the title `Bayesian Analysis of Agricultural Field Experiments  
` and the abstract `SUMMARY The paper describes Bayesian analysis for agricultural field experiments, a topic that has received very little previous attention, despite a vast frequentist literature. Adoption of the Bayesian paradigm simplifies the interpretation of the results, especially in ranking and selection. Also, complex formulations can be analyzed with comparative ease, using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. A key ingredient in the approach is the need for spatial representations of the unobserved fertility patterns. This is discussed in detail. Problems caused by outliers and by jumps in fertility are tackled via hierarchical-t formulations that may find use in other contexts. The paper includes three analyses of variety trials for yield and one example involving binary data; none is entirely straightforward. Some comparisons with frequentist analyses are made. The datasets are available at http://www.stat.duke.edu/~higdon/trials/data.html. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #642641 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #642641 has the title `Bayesian Analysis of Agricultural Field Experiments  
` and the abstract `SUMMARY The paper describes Bayesian analysis for agricultural field experiments, a topic that has received very little previous attention, despite a vast frequentist literature. Adoption of the Bayesian paradigm simplifies the interpretation of the results, especially in ranking and selection. Also, complex formulations can be analyzed with comparative ease, using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. A key ingredient in the approach is the need for spatial representations of the unobserved fertility patterns. This is discussed in detail. Problems caused by outliers and by jumps in fertility are tackled via hierarchical-t formulations that may find use in other contexts. The paper includes three analyses of variety trials for yield and one example involving binary data; none is entirely straightforward. Some comparisons with frequentist analyses are made. The datasets are available at http://www.stat.duke.edu/~higdon/trials/data.html. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #642641 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Probabilistic_Methods