Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1152761. 	[Title]  [Abstract] 1] R.K. Belew, J. McInerney, and N. Schraudolph, Evolving networks: using the genetic algorithm with connectionist learning, in Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity, C.G. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer, S. Rasmussen Eds., vol. 10, Addison-Wesley, 1991. [2] M. McInerney, and A.P. Dhawan, Use of genetic algorithms with back propagation in training of feed-forward neural networks, in IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1, pp. 203-208, 1993. [3] F.Z. Brill, D.E. Brown, and W.N. Martin, Fast genetic selection of features for neural network classifiers, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 324-328, 1992. [4] F. Dellaert, and J. Vandewalle, Automatic design of cellular neural networks by means of genetic algorithms: finding a feature detector, in The Third IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and Their Applications, IEEE, New Jersey, pp. 189-194, 1994. [5] D.E. Moriarty, and R. Miikkulainen, Efficient reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution, Machine Learning, vol. 22, pp. 11-33, 1996. [6] L. Davis, Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991. [7] D. Whitely, The GENITOR algorithm and selective pressure, in Proceedings of the Third Interanational Conference on Genetic Algorithms, J.D. Schaffer Ed., Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA, 1989, pp. 116-121. [8] van Camp, D., T. Plate and G.E. Hinton (1992). The Xerion Neural Network Simulator and Documentation. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #229635. 	[Title] Evolutionary Neural Networks for Value Ordering in Constraint Satisfaction Problems [Abstract] Technical Report AI94-218 May 1994 Abstract A new method for developing good value-ordering strategies in constraint satisfaction search is presented. Using an evolutionary technique called SANE, in which individual neurons evolve to cooperate and form a neural network, problem-specific knowledge can be discovered that results in better value-ordering decisions than those based on problem-general heuristics. A neural network was evolved in a chronological backtrack search to decide the ordering of cars in a resource-limited assembly line. The network required 1/30 of the backtracks of random ordering and 1/3 of the backtracks of the maximization of future options heuristic. The SANE approach should extend well to other domains where heuristic information is either difficult to discover or problem-specific. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1104647. 	[Title] Real-time Interactive Neuro-evolution [Abstract] In standard neuro-evolution, a population of networks is evolved in the task, and the network that best solves the task is found. This network is then fixed and used to solve future instances of the problem. Networks evolved in this way do not handle real-time interaction very well. It is hard to evolve a solution ahead of time that can cope effectively with all the possible environments that might arise in the future and with all the possible ways someone may interact with it. This paper proposes evolving feedforward neural networks online to create agents that improve their performance through real-time interaction. This approach is demonstrated in a game world where neural-network-controlled individuals play against humans. Through evolution, these individuals learn to react to varying opponents while appropriately taking into account conflicting goals. After initial evaluation offline, the population is allowed to evolve online, and its performance improves considerably. The population not only adapts to novel situations brought about by changing strategies in the opponent and the game layout, but it also improves its performance in situations that it has already seen in offline training. This paper will describe an implementation of online evolution and shows that it is a practical method that exceeds the performance of offline evolution alone. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #240791. 	[Title] Auto-teaching: networks that develop their own teaching input [Abstract] Backpropagation learning (Rumelhart, Hinton and Williams, 1986) is a useful research tool but it has a number of undesiderable features such as having the experimenter decide from outside what should be learned. We describe a number of simulations of neural networks that internally generate their own teaching input. The networks generate the teaching input by trasforming the network input through connection weights that are evolved using a form of genetic algorithm. What results is an innate (evolved) capacity not to behave efficiently in an environment but to learn to behave efficiently. The analysis of what these networks evolve to learn shows some interesting results. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #141342. 	[Title] Dynamic Parameter Encoding for Genetic Algorithms [Abstract] The common use of static binary place-value codes for real-valued parameters of the phenotype in Holland's genetic algorithm (GA) forces either the sacrifice of representational precision for efficiency of search or vice versa. Dynamic Parameter Encoding (DPE) is a mechanism that avoids this dilemma by using convergence statistics derived from the GA population to adaptively control the mapping from fixed-length binary genes to real values. DPE is shown to be empirically effective and amenable to analysis; we explore the problem of premature convergence in GAs through two convergence models. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35. 	[Title] 4 Implementing Application Specific Routines  Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Abstract] To implement a specific application, you should only have to change the file app.c. Section 2 describes the routines in app.c in detail. If you use additional variables for your specific problem, the easiest method of making them available to other program units is to declare them in sga.h and external.h. However, take care that you do not redeclare existing variables. Two example applications files are included in the SGA-C distribution. The file app1.c performs the simple example problem included with the Pascal version; finding the maximum of x 10 , where x is an integer interpretation of a chromosome. A slightly more complex application is include in app2.c. This application illustrates two features that have been added to SGA-C. The first of these is the ithruj2int function, which converts bits i through j in a chromosome to an integer. The second new feature is the utility pointer that is associated with each population member. The example application interprets each chromosome as a set of concatenated integers in binary form. The lengths of these integer fields is determined by the user-specified value of field size, which is read in by the function app data(). The field size must be less than the smallest of the chromosome length and the length of an unsigned integer. An integer array for storing the interpreted form of each chromosome is dynamically allocated and assigned to the chromosome's utility pointer in app malloc(). The ithruj2int routine (see utility.c) is used to translate each chromosome into its associated vector. The fitness for each chromosome is simply the sum of the squares of these integers. This example application will function for any chromosome length. SGA-C is intended to be a simple program for first-time GA experimentation. It is not intended to be definitive in terms of its efficiency or the grace of its implementation. The authors are interested in the comments, criticisms, and bug reports from SGA-C users, so that the code can be refined for easier use in subsequent versions. Please email your comments to rob@galab2.mh.ua.edu, or write to TCGA: The authors gratefully acknowledge support provided by NASA under Grant NGT-50224 and support provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant CTS-8451610. We also thank Hillol Kargupta for donating his tournament selection implementation. Booker, L. B. (1982). Intelligent behavior as an adaptation to the task environment (Doctoral dissertation, Technical Report No. 243. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Logic of Computers Group). Dissertations Abstracts International, 43(2), 469B. (University Microfilms No. 8214966) Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #45605. 	[Title] Learning and evolution in neural networks [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #8872. 	[Title] Machine Learning,  Efficient Reinforcement Learning through Symbiotic Evolution [Abstract] This article presents a new reinforcement learning method called SANE (Symbiotic, Adaptive Neuro-Evolution), which evolves a population of neurons through genetic algorithms to form a neural network capable of performing a task. Symbiotic evolution promotes both cooperation and specialization, which results in a fast, efficient genetic search and discourages convergence to suboptimal solutions. In the inverted pendulum problem, SANE formed effective networks 9 to 16 times faster than the Adaptive Heuristic Critic and 2 times faster than Q-learning and the GENITOR neuro-evolution approach without loss of generalization. Such efficient learning, combined with few domain assumptions, make SANE a promising approach to a broad range of reinforcement learning problems, including many real-world applications. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #8875. 	[Title] A Coevolutionary Approach to Learning Sequential Decision Rules [Abstract] We present a coevolutionary approach to learning sequential decision rules which appears to have a number of advantages over non-coevolutionary approaches. The coevolutionary approach encourages the formation of stable niches representing simpler sub-behaviors. The evolutionary direction of each subbehavior can be controlled independently, providing an alternative to evolving complex behavior using intermediate training steps. Results are presented showing a significant learning rate speedup over a non-coevolutionary approach in a simulated robot domain. In addition, the results suggest the coevolutionary approach may lead to emer gent problem decompositions. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #210871. 	[Title] Coevolving High-Level Representations [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #144701. 	[Title] Evolution of Mapmaking: Learning, planning, and memory using Genetic Programming [Abstract] An essential component of an intelligent agent is the ability to observe, encode, and use information about its environment. Traditional approaches to Genetic Programming have focused on evolving functional or reactive programs with only a minimal use of state. This paper presents an approach for investigating the evolution of learning, planning, and memory using Genetic Programming. The approach uses a multi-phasic fitness environment that enforces the use of memory and allows fairly straightforward comprehension of the evolved representations . An illustrative problem of 'gold' collection is used to demonstrate the usefulness of the approach. The results indicate that the approach can evolve programs that store simple representations of their environments and use these representations to produce simple plans. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #197054. 	[Title] Evolving Obstacle Avoidance Behavior in a Robot Arm [Abstract] Existing approaches for learning to control a robot arm rely on supervised methods where correct behavior is explicitly given. It is difficult to learn to avoid obstacles using such methods, however, because examples of obstacle avoidance behavior are hard to generate. This paper presents an alternative approach that evolves neural network controllers through genetic algorithms. No input/output examples are necessary, since neuro-evolution learns from a single performance measurement over the entire task of grasping an object. The approach is tested in a simulation of the OSCAR-6 robot arm which receives both visual and sensory input. Neural networks evolved to effectively avoid obstacles at various locations to reach random target locations. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #682815. 	[Title] The Role of Development in Genetic Algorithms [Abstract] Technical Report Number CS94-394 Computer Science and Engineering, U.C.S.D. Abstract The developmental mechanisms transforming genotypic to phenotypic forms are typically omitted in formulations of genetic algorithms (GAs) in which these two representational spaces are identical. We argue that a careful analysis of developmental mechanisms is useful when understanding the success of several standard GA techniques, and can clarify the relationships between more recently proposed enhancements. We provide a framework which distinguishes between two developmental mechanisms | learning and maturation | while also showing several common effects on GA search. This framework is used to analyze how maturation and local search can change the dynamics of the GA. We observe that in some contexts, maturation and local search can be incorporated into the fitness evaluation, but illustrate reasons for considering them seperately. Further, we identify contexts in which maturation and local search can be distinguished from the fitness evaluation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #503871. 	[Title] Growing neural networks [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #395075. 	[Title] EVOLVING NEURAL NETWORKS WITH COLLABORATIVE SPECIES [Abstract] We present a coevolutionary architecture for solving decomposable problems and apply it to the evolution of artificial neural networks. Although this work is preliminary in nature it has a number of advantages over non-coevolutionary approaches. The coevolutionary approach utilizes a divide-and-conquer technique in which species representing simpler subtasks are evolved in separate instances of a genetic algorithm executing in parallel. Collaborations among the species are formed representing complete solutions. Species are created dynamically as needed. Results are presented in which the coevolutionary architecture produces higher quality solutions in fewer evolutionary trials when compared with an alternative non-coevolutionary approach on the problem of evolving cascade networks for parity computation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1153860. 	[Title]  [Abstract] 1] R.K. Belew, J. McInerney, and N. Schraudolph, Evolving networks: using the genetic algorithm with connectionist learning, in Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity, C.G. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer, S. Rasmussen Eds., vol. 10, Addison-Wesley, 1991. [2] M. McInerney, and A.P. Dhawan, Use of genetic algorithms with back propagation in training of feed-forward neural networks, in IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1, pp. 203-208, 1993. [3] F.Z. Brill, D.E. Brown, and W.N. Martin, Fast genetic selection of features for neural network classifiers, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 324-328, 1992. [4] F. Dellaert, and J. Vandewalle, Automatic design of cellular neural networks by means of genetic algorithms: finding a feature detector, in The Third IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and Their Applications, IEEE, New Jersey, pp. 189-194, 1994. [5] D.E. Moriarty, and R. Miikkulainen, Efficient reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution, Machine Learning, vol. 22, pp. 11-33, 1996. [6] L. Davis, Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991. [7] D. Whitely, The GENITOR algorithm and selective pressure, in Proceedings of the Third Interanational Conference on Genetic Algorithms, J.D. Schaffer Ed., Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA, 1989, pp. 116-121. [8] van Camp, D., T. Plate and G.E. Hinton (1992). The Xerion Neural Network Simulator and Documentation. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #263498. 	[Title] Automatic Design of Cellular Neural Networks by means of Genetic Algorithms: Finding a Feature Detector [Abstract] This paper aims to examine the use of genetic algorithms to optimize subsystems of cellular neural network architectures. The application at hand is character recognition: the aim is to evolve an optimal feature detector in order to aid a conventional classifier network to generalize across different fonts. To this end, a performance function and a genetic encoding for a feature detector are presented. An experiment is described where an optimal feature detector is indeed found by the genetic algorithm. We are interested in the application of cellular neural networks in computer vision. Genetic algorithms (GA's) [1-3] can serve to optimize the design of cellular neural networks. Although the design of the global architecture of the system could still be done by human insight, we propose that specific sub-modules of the system are best optimized using one or other optimization method. GAs are a good candidate to fulfill this optimization role, as they are well suited to problems where the objective function is a complex function of many parameters. The specific problem we want to investigate is one of character recognition. More specifically, we would like to use the GA to find optimal feature detectors to be used in the recognition of digits . Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #32083. 	[Title] Back Propagation is Sensitive to Initial Conditions [Abstract] This paper explores the effect of initial weight selection on feed-forward networks learning simple functions with the back-propagation technique. We first demonstrate, through the use of Monte Carlo techniques, that the magnitude of the initial condition vector (in weight space) is a very significant parameter in convergence time variability. In order to further understand this result, additional deterministic experiments were performed. The results of these experiments demonstrate the extreme sensitivity of back propagation to initial weight configuration. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #22229. 	[Title] The Automatic Programming of Agents that Learn Mental Models and Create Simple Plans of Action [Abstract] An essential component of an intelligent agent is the ability to notice, encode, store, and utilize information about its environment. Traditional approaches to program induction have focused on evolving functional or reactive programs. This paper presents MAPMAKER, an approach to the automatic generation of agents that discover information about their environment, encode this information for later use, and create simple plans utilizing the stored mental models. In this approach, agents are multipart computer programs that communicate through a shared memory. Both the programs and the representation scheme are evolved using genetic programming. An illustrative problem of 'gold' collection is used to demonstrate the approach in which one part of a program makes a map of the world and stores it in memory, and the other part uses this map to find the gold The results indicate that the approach can evolve programs that store simple representations of their environments and use these representations to produce simple plans. 1. Introduction Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1113438. 	[Title] Modeling the Evolution of Motivation [Abstract] In order for learning to improve the adaptiveness of an animal's behavior and thus direct evolution in the way Baldwin suggested, the learning mechanism must incorporate an innate evaluation of how the animal's actions influence its reproductive fitness. For example, many circumstances that damage an animal, or otherwise reduce its fitness are painful and tend to be avoided. We refer to the mechanism by which an animal evaluates the fitness consequences of its actions as a "motivation system," and argue that such a system must evolve along with the behaviors it evaluates. We describe simulations of the evolution of populations of agents instantiating a number of different architectures for generating action and learning, in worlds of differing complexity. We find that in some cases, members of the populations evolve motivation systems that are accurate enough to direct learning so as to increase the fitness of the actions the agents perform. Furthermore, the motivation systems tend to incorporate systematic distortions in their representations of the worlds they inhabit; these distortions can increase the adaptiveness of the behavior generated. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1125092. 	[Title] 2-D Pole Balancing with Recurrent Evolutionary Networks [Abstract] The success of evolutionary methods on standard control learning tasks has created a need for new benchmarks. The classic pole balancing problem is no longer difficult enough to serve as a viable yardstick for measuring the learning efficiency of these systems. In this paper we present a more difficult version to the classic problem where the cart and pole can move in a plane. We demonstrate a neuroevolution system (Enforced Sub-Populations, or ESP) that can solve this difficult problem without velocity information. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35061. 	[Title] Evolving Networks: Using the Genetic Algorithm with Connectionist Learning [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #48766. 	[Title] Discovering Complex Othello Strategies Through Evolutionary Neural Networks [Abstract] An approach to develop new game playing strategies based on artificial evolution of neural networks is presented. Evolution was directed to discover strategies in Othello against a random-moving opponent and later against an ff-fi search program. The networks discovered first a standard positional strategy, and subsequently a mobility strategy, an advanced strategy rarely seen outside of tournaments. The latter discovery demonstrates how evolutionary neural networks can develop novel solutions by turning an initial disadvantage into an advantage in a changed environment. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #1152761 has the title `nan` and the abstract `1] R.K. Belew, J. McInerney, and N. Schraudolph, Evolving networks: using the genetic algorithm with connectionist learning, in Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity, C.G. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer, S. Rasmussen Eds., vol. 10, Addison-Wesley, 1991. [2] M. McInerney, and A.P. Dhawan, Use of genetic algorithms with back propagation in training of feed-forward neural networks, in IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1, pp. 203-208, 1993. [3] F.Z. Brill, D.E. Brown, and W.N. Martin, Fast genetic selection of features for neural network classifiers, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 324-328, 1992. [4] F. Dellaert, and J. Vandewalle, Automatic design of cellular neural networks by means of genetic algorithms: finding a feature detector, in The Third IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and Their Applications, IEEE, New Jersey, pp. 189-194, 1994. [5] D.E. Moriarty, and R. Miikkulainen, Efficient reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution, Machine Learning, vol. 22, pp. 11-33, 1996. [6] L. Davis, Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991. [7] D. Whitely, The GENITOR algorithm and selective pressure, in Proceedings of the Third Interanational Conference on Genetic Algorithms, J.D. Schaffer Ed., Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA, 1989, pp. 116-121. [8] van Camp, D., T. Plate and G.E. Hinton (1992). The Xerion Neural Network Simulator and Documentation. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1152761 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #1152761 has the title `nan` and the abstract `1] R.K. Belew, J. McInerney, and N. Schraudolph, Evolving networks: using the genetic algorithm with connectionist learning, in Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity, C.G. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer, S. Rasmussen Eds., vol. 10, Addison-Wesley, 1991. [2] M. McInerney, and A.P. Dhawan, Use of genetic algorithms with back propagation in training of feed-forward neural networks, in IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1, pp. 203-208, 1993. [3] F.Z. Brill, D.E. Brown, and W.N. Martin, Fast genetic selection of features for neural network classifiers, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 324-328, 1992. [4] F. Dellaert, and J. Vandewalle, Automatic design of cellular neural networks by means of genetic algorithms: finding a feature detector, in The Third IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and Their Applications, IEEE, New Jersey, pp. 189-194, 1994. [5] D.E. Moriarty, and R. Miikkulainen, Efficient reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution, Machine Learning, vol. 22, pp. 11-33, 1996. [6] L. Davis, Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991. [7] D. Whitely, The GENITOR algorithm and selective pressure, in Proceedings of the Third Interanational Conference on Genetic Algorithms, J.D. Schaffer Ed., Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA, 1989, pp. 116-121. [8] van Camp, D., T. Plate and G.E. Hinton (1992). The Xerion Neural Network Simulator and Documentation. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1152761 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Genetic_Algorithms