Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #596075. 	[Title] AN ARCHITECTURE FOR GOAL-DRIVEN EXPLANATION [Abstract] In complex and changing environments explanation must be a a dynamic and goal-driven process. This paper discusses an evolving system implementing a novel model of explanation generation | Goal-Driven Interactive Explanation | that models explanation as a goal-driven, multi-strategy, situated process inter-weaving reasoning with action. We describe a preliminary implementation of this model in gobie, a system that generates explanations for its internal use to support plan generation and execution. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1956. 	[Title] INFERENTIAL THEORY OF LEARNING: Developing Foundations for Multistrategy Learning [Abstract] The development of multistrategy learning systems should be based on a clear understanding of the roles and the applicability conditions of different learning strategies. To this end, this chapter introduces the Inferential Theory of Learning that provides a conceptual framework for explaining logical capabilities of learning strategies, i.e., their competence. Viewing learning as a process of modifying the learners knowledge by exploring the learners experience, the theory postulates that any such process can be described as a search in a knowledge space, triggered by the learners experience and guided by learning goals. The search operators are instantiations of knowledge transmutations, which are generic patterns of knowledge change. Transmutations may employ any basic type of inferencededuction, induction or analogy. Several fundamental knowledge transmutations are described in a novel and general way, such as generalization, abstraction, explanation and similization, and their counterparts, specialization, concretion, prediction and dissimilization, respectively. Generalization enlarges the reference set of a description (the set of entities that are being described). Abstraction reduces the amount of the detail about the reference set. Explanation generates premises that explain (or imply) the given properties of the reference set. Similization transfers knowledge from one reference set to a similar reference set. Using concepts of the theory, a multistrategy task-adaptive learning (MTL) methodology is outlined, and illustrated b y an example. MTL dynamically adapts strategies to the learning task, defined by the input information, learners background knowledge, and the learning goal. It aims at synergistically integrating a whole range of inferential learning strategies, such as empirical generalization, constructive induction, deductive generalization, explanation, prediction, abstraction, and similization. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1959. 	[Title] Introspective reasoning using meta-explanations for multistrategy learning [Abstract] In order to learn effectively, a reasoner must not only possess knowledge about the world and be able to improve that knowledge, but it also must introspectively reason about how it performs a given task and what particular pieces of knowledge it needs to improve its performance at the current task. Introspection requires declarative representations of meta-knowledge of the reasoning performed by the system during the performance task, of the system's knowledge, and of the organization of this knowledge. This chapter presents a taxonomy of possible reasoning failures that can occur during a performance task, declarative representations of these failures, and associations between failures and particular learning strategies. The theory is based on Meta-XPs, which are explanation structures that help the system identify failure types, formulate learning goals, and choose appropriate learning strategies in order to avoid similar mistakes in the future. The theory is implemented in a computer model of an introspective reasoner that performs multistrategy learning during a story understanding task. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #82666. 	[Title] Goal-Driven Learning: Fundamental Issues (A Symposium Report) [Abstract] In Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and Education, a growing body of research supports the view that learning is a goal-directed process. Psychological experiments show that people with different goals process information differently; studies in education show that goals have strong effects on what students learn; and functional arguments from machine learning support the necessity of goal-based focusing of learner effort. At the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, a symposium brought together researchers in AI, psychology, and education to discuss goal-driven learning. This article presents the fundamental points illuminated by the symposium, placing them in the context of open questions and current research di rections in goal-driven learning. fl Appears in AI Magazine, 14(4):67-72, 1993 Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #101143. 	[Title] Issues in Goal-Driven Explanation [Abstract] When a reasoner explains surprising events for its internal use, a key motivation for explaining is to perform learning that will facilitate the achievement of its goals. Human explainers use a range of strategies to build explanations, including both internal reasoning and external information search, and goal-based considerations have a profound effect on their choices of when and how to pursue explanations. However, standard AI models of explanation rely on goal-neutral use of a single fixed strategy|generally backwards chaining|to build their explanations. This paper argues that explanation should be modeled as a goal-driven learning process for gathering and transforming information, and discusses the issues involved in developing an active multi-strategy process for goal-driven explanation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #101145. 	[Title] Abduction, Experience, and Goals: A Model of Everyday Abductive Explanation* [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #596075 has the title `AN ARCHITECTURE FOR GOAL-DRIVEN EXPLANATION  
` and the abstract `In complex and changing environments explanation must be a a dynamic and goal-driven process. This paper discusses an evolving system implementing a novel model of explanation generation | Goal-Driven Interactive Explanation | that models explanation as a goal-driven, multi-strategy, situated process inter-weaving reasoning with action. We describe a preliminary implementation of this model in gobie, a system that generates explanations for its internal use to support plan generation and execution. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #596075 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #596075 has the title `AN ARCHITECTURE FOR GOAL-DRIVEN EXPLANATION  
` and the abstract `In complex and changing environments explanation must be a a dynamic and goal-driven process. This paper discusses an evolving system implementing a novel model of explanation generation | Goal-Driven Interactive Explanation | that models explanation as a goal-driven, multi-strategy, situated process inter-weaving reasoning with action. We describe a preliminary implementation of this model in gobie, a system that generates explanations for its internal use to support plan generation and execution. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #596075 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Case_Based