Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1103979. 	[Title] Prior Information and Generalized Questions [Abstract] This report describes research done within the Center for Biological and Computational Learning in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This research is sponsored by a grant from National Science Foundation under contract ASC-9217041 and a grant from ONR/ARPA under contract N00014-92-J-1879. The author was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship (Le 1014/1-1) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and a NSF/CISE Postdoctoral Fellowship. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1105344. 	[Title] In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8  Gaussian Processes for Regression [Abstract] The Bayesian analysis of neural networks is difficult because a simple prior over weights implies a complex prior distribution over functions. In this paper we investigate the use of Gaussian process priors over functions, which permit the predictive Bayesian analysis for fixed values of hyperparameters to be carried out exactly using matrix operations. Two methods, using optimization and averaging (via Hybrid Monte Carlo) over hyperparameters have been tested on a number of challenging problems and have produced excellent results. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1140040. 	[Title] for Projective Basis Function Networks 2m1 Global Form 2m Local Form With appropriate constant factors, [Abstract] OGI CSE Technical Report 96-006 Abstract: Smoothing regularizers for radial basis functions have been studied extensively, but no general smoothing regularizers for projective basis functions (PBFs), such as the widely-used sigmoidal PBFs, have heretofore been proposed. We derive new classes of algebraically-simple m th -order smoothing regularizers for networks of projective basis functions f (W; x) = P N fi fl + u 0 ; with general transfer functions g[]. These simple algebraic forms R(W; m) enable the direct enforcement of smoothness without the need for costly Monte Carlo integrations of S(W; m). The regularizers are tested on illustrative sample problems and compared to quadratic weight decay. The new regularizers are shown to yield better generalization errors than Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #906. 	[Title] Regularization Theory and Neural Networks Architectures [Abstract] We had previously shown that regularization principles lead to approximation schemes which are equivalent to networks with one layer of hidden units, called Regularization Networks. In particular, standard smoothness functionals lead to a subclass of regularization networks, the well known Radial Basis Functions approximation schemes. This paper shows that regularization networks encompass a much broader range of approximation schemes, including many of the popular general additive models and some of the neural networks. In particular, we introduce new classes of smoothness functionals that lead to different classes of basis functions. Additive splines as well as some tensor product splines can be obtained from appropriate classes of smoothness functionals. Furthermore, the same generalization that extends Radial Basis Functions (RBF) to Hyper Basis Functions (HBF) also leads from additive models to ridge approximation models, containing as special cases Breiman's hinge functions, some forms of Projection Pursuit Regression and several types of neural networks. We propose to use the term Generalized Regularization Networks for this broad class of approximation schemes that follow from an extension of regularization. In the probabilistic interpretation of regularization, the different classes of basis functions correspond to different classes of prior probabilities on the approximating function spaces, and therefore to different types of smoothness assumptions. In summary, different multilayer networks with one hidden layer, which we collectively call Generalized Regularization Networks, correspond to different classes of priors and associated smoothness functionals in a classical regularization principle. Three broad classes are a) Radial Basis Functions that can be generalized to Hyper Basis Functions, b) some tensor product splines, and c) additive splines that can be generalized to schemes of the type of ridge approximation, hinge functions and several perceptron-like neural networks with one-hidden layer. 1 This paper will appear on Neural Computation, vol. 7, pages 219-269, 1995. An earlier version of Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #34315. 	[Title] Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Classification via Hybrid Monte Carlo [Abstract] The full Bayesian method for applying neural networks to a prediction problem is to set up the prior/hyperprior structure for the net and then perform the necessary integrals. However, these integrals are not tractable analytically, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are slow, especially if the parameter space is high-dimensional. Using Gaussian processes we can approximate the weight space integral analytically, so that only a small number of hyperparameters need be integrated over by MCMC methods. We have applied this idea to classification problems, obtaining ex cellent results on the real-world problems investigated so far. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1136397. 	[Title] State Reconstruction for Determining Predictability in Driven Nonlinear Acoustical Systems [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #910. 	[Title] Learning networks for face analysis and synthesis [Abstract] This paper presents an overview of the face-related projects in our group. The unifying theme underlying our work is the use of example-based learning methods for both analyzing and synthesizing face images. We label the example face images (and for the problem of face detection, "near miss" faces as well) with descriptive parameters for pose, expression, identity, and face vs. non-face. Then, by using example-based learning techniques, we develop networks for performing analysis tasks such as pose and expression estimation, face recognition, and face detection in cluttered scenes. In addition to these analysis applications, we show how the example-based technique can also be used as a novel method for image synthesis that is for computer graphics. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #24974. 	[Title] EVALUATION OF GAUSSIAN PROCESSES AND OTHER METHODS FOR NON-LINEAR REGRESSION [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1114352. 	[Title] Cortical Mechanisms of Visual Recognition and Learning: A Hierarchical Kalman Filter Model [Abstract] We describe a biologically plausible model of dynamic recognition and learning in the visual cortex based on the statistical theory of Kalman filtering from optimal control theory. The model utilizes a hierarchical network whose successive levels implement Kalman filters operating over successively larger spatial and temporal scales. Each hierarchical level in the network predicts the current visual recognition state at a lower level and adapts its own recognition state using the residual error between the prediction and the actual lower-level state. Simultaneously, the network also learns an internal model of the spatiotemporal dynamics of the input stream by adapting the synaptic weights at each hierarchical level in order to minimize prediction errors. The Kalman filter model respects key neuroanatomical data such as the reciprocity of connections between visual cortical areas, and assigns specific computational roles to the inter-laminar connections known to exist between neurons in the visual cortex. Previous work elucidated the usefulness of this model in explaining neurophysiological phenomena such as endstopping and other related extra-classical receptive field effects. In this paper, in addition to providing a more detailed exposition of the model, we present a variety of experimental results demonstrating the ability of this model to perform robust spatiotemporal segmentation and recognition of objects and image sequences in the presence of varying amounts of occlusion, background clutter, and noise. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #34355. 	[Title] PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND THE CREATION OF "VIRTUAL" EXAMPLES FOR RBF NETWORKS 1 [Abstract] We consider the problem of how to incorporate prior knowledge in supervised learning techniques. We set the problem in the framework of regularization theory, and consider the case in which we know that the approximated function has radial symmetry. The problem can be solved in two alternative ways: 1) use the invariance as a constraint in the regularization theory framework to derive a rotation invariant version of Radial Basis Functions; 2) use the radial symmetry to create new, "virtual" examples from a given data set. We show that these two apparently different methods of learning from "hints" (Abu-Mostafa, 1993) lead to exactly the same analyt ical solution. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #40125. 	[Title] Monte Carlo Implementation of Gaussian Process Models for Bayesian Regression and Classification [Abstract] Technical Report No. 9702, Department of Statistics, University of Toronto Abstract. Gaussian processes are a natural way of defining prior distributions over functions of one or more input variables. In a simple nonparametric regression problem, where such a function gives the mean of a Gaussian distribution for an observed response, a Gaussian process model can easily be implemented using matrix computations that are feasible for datasets of up to about a thousand cases. Hyperparameters that define the covariance function of the Gaussian process can be sampled using Markov chain methods. Regression models where the noise has a t distribution and logistic or probit models for classification applications can be implemented by sampling as well for latent values underlying the observations. Software is now available that implements these methods using covariance functions with hierarchical parameterizations. Models defined in this way can discover high-level properties of the data, such as which inputs are relevant to predicting the response. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #1103979 has the title `Prior Information and Generalized Questions  
` and the abstract `This report describes research done within the Center for Biological and Computational Learning in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This research is sponsored by a grant from National Science Foundation under contract ASC-9217041 and a grant from ONR/ARPA under contract N00014-92-J-1879. The author was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship (Le 1014/1-1) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and a NSF/CISE Postdoctoral Fellowship. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1103979 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #1103979 has the title `Prior Information and Generalized Questions  
` and the abstract `This report describes research done within the Center for Biological and Computational Learning in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This research is sponsored by a grant from National Science Foundation under contract ASC-9217041 and a grant from ONR/ARPA under contract N00014-92-J-1879. The author was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship (Le 1014/1-1) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and a NSF/CISE Postdoctoral Fellowship. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1103979 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Neural_Networks