Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1105360. 	[Title] Stable ILP Exploring the Added Expressivity of Negation in the Background Knowledge [Abstract] We present stable ILP, a cross-disciplinary concept straddling machine learning and nonmonotonic reasoning. Stable models give meaning to logic programs containing negative assertions. In stable ILP, we employ stable models to represent the current state specified by (possibly) negative EDB and IDB rules. The state then serves as the background knowledge for a top-down ILP learner. We present a framework and implementation (system INDED) of one realization of stable ILP. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1121057. 	[Title] Inductive CBR for Customer Support [Abstract] Over the past few years, the telecommunications paradigm has been shifting rapidly from hardware to middleware. In particular, the traditional issues of service characteristics and network control are being replaced by the modern, customer-driven issues of network and service management (e.g., electronic commerce, one-stop shops). An area of service management which has extremely high visibility and negative impact when managed badly is that of problem handling. Problem handling is a very knowledge intensive activity, particularly nowadays with the increase in number and complexity of services becoming available. Trials at several BT support centres have already demonstrated the potential of case-based reasoning technology in improving current practice for problem detection and diagnosis. A major cost involved in implementing a case-based system is in the manual building of the initial case base and then in the subsequent maintenance of that case base over time. This paper shows how inductive machine learning can be combined with case-based reasoning to produce an intelligent system capable of both extracting knowledge from raw data automatically and reasoning from that knowledge. In addition to discovering knowledge in existing data repositories, the integrated system may be used to acquire and revise knowledge continually. Experiments with the suggested integrated approach demonstrate promise and justify the next step. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #63812. 	[Title] FLARE: Induction with Prior Knowledge [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1125393. 	[Title] Beyond predictive accuracy: what? [Abstract] Today's potential users of machine learning technology are faced with the non-trivial problem of choosing, from the large, ever-increasing number of available tools, the one most appropriate for their particular task. To assist the often non-initiated users, it is desirable that this model selection process be automated. Using experience from base level learning, researchers have proposed meta-learning as a possible solution. Historically, predictive accuracy has been the de facto criterion, with most work in meta-learning focusing on the discovery of rules that match applications to models based on accuracy only. Although predictive accuracy is clearly an important criterion, it is also the case that there are a number of other criteria that could, and often ought to, be considered when learning about model selection. This paper presents a number of such criteria and discusses the impact they have on meta-level approaches to model selection. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #1105360 has the title `Stable ILP Exploring the Added Expressivity of Negation in the Background Knowledge  
` and the abstract `We present stable ILP, a cross-disciplinary concept straddling machine learning and nonmonotonic reasoning. Stable models give meaning to logic programs containing negative assertions. In stable ILP, we employ stable models to represent the current state specified by (possibly) negative EDB and IDB rules. The state then serves as the background knowledge for a top-down ILP learner. We present a framework and implementation (system INDED) of one realization of stable ILP. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1105360 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #1105360 has the title `Stable ILP Exploring the Added Expressivity of Negation in the Background Knowledge  
` and the abstract `We present stable ILP, a cross-disciplinary concept straddling machine learning and nonmonotonic reasoning. Stable models give meaning to logic programs containing negative assertions. In stable ILP, we employ stable models to represent the current state specified by (possibly) negative EDB and IDB rules. The state then serves as the background knowledge for a top-down ILP learner. We present a framework and implementation (system INDED) of one realization of stable ILP. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1105360 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Rule_Learning