Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #13024. 	[Title] ARB: A Hardware Mechanism for Dynamic Reordering of Memory References* [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #137956. 	[Title] Control Flow Prediction For Dynamic ILP Processors [Abstract] We introduce a technique to enhance the ability of dynamic ILP processors to exploit (speculatively executed) parallelism. Existing branch prediction mechanisms used to establish a dynamic window from which ILP can be extracted are limited in their abilities to: (i) create a large, accurate dynamic window, (ii) initiate a large number of instructions into this window in every cycle, and (iii) traverse multiple branches of the control flow graph per prediction. We introduce control flow prediction which uses information in the control flow graph of a program to overcome these limitations. We discuss how information present in the control flow graph can be represented using multiblocks, and conveyed to the hardware using Control Flow Tables and Control Flow Prediction Buffers. We evaluate the potential of control flow prediction on an abstract machine and on a dynamic ILP processing model. Our results indicate that control flow prediction is a powerful and effective assist to the hardware in making more informed run time decisions about program control flow. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #8591. 	[Title] Limits of Control Flow on Parallelism [Abstract] This paper discusses three techniques useful in relaxing the constraints imposed by control flow on parallelism: control dependence analysis, executing multiple flows of control simultaneously, and speculative execution. We evaluate these techniques by using trace simulations to find the limits of parallelism for machines that employ different combinations of these techniques. We have three major results. First, local regions of code have limited parallelism, and control dependence analysis is useful in extracting global parallelism from different parts of a program. Second, a superscalar processor is fundamentally limited because it cannot execute independent regions of code concurrently. Higher performance can be obtained with machines, such as multiprocessors and dataflow machines, that can simultaneously follow multiple flows of control. Finally, without speculative execution to allow instructions to execute before their control dependences are resolved, only modest amounts of parallelism can be obtained for programs with complex control flow. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #899119. 	[Title] Task Selection for a Multiscalar Processor [Abstract] The Multiscalar architecture advocates a distributed processor organization and task-level speculation to exploit high degrees of instruction level parallelism (ILP) in sequential programs without impeding improvements in clock speeds. The main goal of this paper is to understand the key implications of the architectural features of distributed processor organization and task-level speculation for compiler task selection from the point of view of performance. We identify the fundamental performance issues to be: control ow speculation, data communication, data dependence speculation, load imbalance, and task overhead. We show that these issues are intimately related to a few key characteristics of tasks: task size, inter-task control ow, and inter-task data dependence. We describe compiler heuristics to select tasks with favorable characteristics. We report experimental results to show that the heuristics are successful in boosting overall performance by establishing larger ILP windows. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #8594. 	[Title] The Limits of Instruction Level Parallelism in SPEC95 Applications [Abstract] This paper examines the limits to instruction level parallelism that can be found in programs, in particular the SPEC95 benchmark suite. It differs from earlier studies in removing non-essential true dependencies that occur as a result of the compiler employing a stack for subroutine linkage. This is a subtle limitation to parallelism that is not readily evident as it appears as a true dependency on the stack pointer. In this paper we show that its removal exposes far more parallelism than has been seen previously. We refer to this type of parallelism as "parallelism at a distance" because it requires impossibly large instruction windows for detection. We conclude with two observations: 1) that a single instruction window characteristic of superscalar machines is inadequate for detecting parallelism at a distance; and 2) in order to take advantage of this parallelism the compiler must be involved, or separate threads must be explicitly programmed. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #58268. 	[Title] THE EXPANDABLE SPLIT WINDOW PARADIGM FOR EXPLOITING FINE-GRAIN PARALLELISM [Abstract] We propose a new processing paradigm, called the Expandable Split Window (ESW) paradigm, for exploiting fine-grain parallelism. This paradigm considers a window of instructions (possibly having dependencies) as a single unit, and exploits fine-grain parallelism by overlapping the execution of multiple windows. The basic idea is to connect multiple sequential processors, in a decoupled and decentralized manner, to achieve overall multiple issue. This processing paradigm shares a number of properties of the restricted dataflow machines, but was derived from the sequential von Neumann architecture. We also present an implementation of the Expandable Split Window execution model, and preliminary performance results. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #13024 has the title `ARB: A Hardware Mechanism for Dynamic Reordering of Memory References*  
` and the abstract `nan`.
Question: Which category should Paper #13024 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #13024 has the title `ARB: A Hardware Mechanism for Dynamic Reordering of Memory References*  
` and the abstract `nan`.
Question: Which category should Paper #13024 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Rule_Learning