Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1133010. 	[Title] Decimatable Boltzmann Machines vs. Gibbs Sampling [Abstract] Exact Boltzmann learning can be done in certain restricted networks by the technique of decimation. We have enlarged the set of dec-imatable Boltzmann machines by introducing a new and more general decimation rule. We have compared solutions of a probability density estimation problem with decimatable Boltzmann machines to the results obtained by Gibbs sampling in unrestricted (non-decimatable) Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #6818. 	[Title] Exploiting Tractable Substructures in Intractable Networks [Abstract] We develop a refined mean field approximation for inference and learning in probabilistic neural networks. Our mean field theory, unlike most, does not assume that the units behave as independent degrees of freedom; instead, it exploits in a principled way the existence of large substructures that are computationally tractable. To illustrate the advantages of this framework, we show how to incorporate weak higher order interactions into a first-order hidden Markov model, treating the corrections (but not the first order structure) within mean field theory. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #52515. 	[Title] Unsupervised learning of distributions on binary vectors using two layer networks [Abstract] We present a distribution model for binary vectors, called the influence combination model and show how this model can be used as the basis for unsupervised learning algorithms for feature selection. The model is closely related to the Harmonium model defined by Smolensky [RM86][Ch.6]. In the first part of the paper we analyze properties of this distribution representation scheme. We show that arbitrary distributions of binary vectors can be approximated by the combination model. We show how the weight vectors in the model can be interpreted as high order correlation patterns among the input bits. We compare the combination model with the mixture model and with principle component analysis. In the second part of the paper we present two algorithms for learning the combination model from examples. The first algorithm is based on gradient ascent. Here we give a closed form for this gradient that is significantly easier to compute than the corresponding gradient for the general Boltzmann machine. The second learning algorithm is a greedy method that creates the hidden units and computes their weights one at a time. This method is a variant of projection pursuit density estimation. In the third part of the paper we give experimental results for these learning methods on synthetic data and on natural data of handwritten digit images. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #300806. 	[Title] Learning in Boltzmann Trees [Abstract] We introduce a large family of Boltzmann machines that can be trained using standard gradient descent. The networks can have one or more layers of hidden units, with tree-like connectivity. We show how to implement the supervised learning algorithm for these Boltzmann machines exactly, without resort to simulated or mean-field annealing. The stochastic averages that yield the gradients in weight space are computed by the technique of decimation. We present results on the problems of N -bit parity and the detection of hidden symmetries. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #688849. 	[Title] In  Stable Dynamic Parameter Adaptation [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #29723. 	[Title] Boltzmann Chains and Hidden Markov Models [Abstract] We propose a statistical mechanical framework for the modeling of discrete time series. Maximum likelihood estimation is done via Boltzmann learning in one-dimensional networks with tied weights. We call these networks Boltzmann chains and show that they contain hidden Markov models (HMMs) as a special case. Our framework also motivates new architectures that address particular shortcomings of HMMs. We look at two such architectures: parallel chains that model feature sets with disparate time scales, and looped networks that model long-term dependencies between hidden states. For these networks, we show how to implement the Boltzmann learning rule exactly, in polynomial time, without resort to simulated or mean-field annealing. The necessary computations are done by exact decimation procedures from statistical mechanics. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #396412. 	[Title] Boltzmann Machine learning using mean field theory and linear response correction [Abstract] We present a new approximate learning algorithm for Boltzmann Machines, using a systematic expansion of the Gibbs free energy to second order in the weights. The linear response correction to the correlations is given by the Hessian of the Gibbs free energy. The computational complexity of the algorithm is cubic in the number of neurons. We compare the performance of the exact BM learning algorithm with first order (Weiss) mean field theory and second order (TAP) mean field theory. The learning task consists of a fully connected Ising spin glass model on 10 neurons. We conclude that 1) the method works well for paramagnetic problems 2) the TAP correction gives a significant improvement over the Weiss mean field theory, both for paramagnetic and spin glass problems and 3) that the inclusion of diagonal weights improves the Weiss approximation for paramagnetic problems, but not for spin glass problems. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #1133010 has the title `Decimatable Boltzmann Machines vs. Gibbs Sampling  
` and the abstract `Exact Boltzmann learning can be done in certain restricted networks by the technique of decimation. We have enlarged the set of dec-imatable Boltzmann machines by introducing a new and more general decimation rule. We have compared solutions of a probability density estimation problem with decimatable Boltzmann machines to the results obtained by Gibbs sampling in unrestricted (non-decimatable) 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1133010 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #1133010 has the title `Decimatable Boltzmann Machines vs. Gibbs Sampling  
` and the abstract `Exact Boltzmann learning can be done in certain restricted networks by the technique of decimation. We have enlarged the set of dec-imatable Boltzmann machines by introducing a new and more general decimation rule. We have compared solutions of a probability density estimation problem with decimatable Boltzmann machines to the results obtained by Gibbs sampling in unrestricted (non-decimatable) 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1133010 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Probabilistic_Methods