Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #175256. 	[Title] Adaptive Global Optimization with Local Search [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35. 	[Title] 4 Implementing Application Specific Routines  Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Abstract] To implement a specific application, you should only have to change the file app.c. Section 2 describes the routines in app.c in detail. If you use additional variables for your specific problem, the easiest method of making them available to other program units is to declare them in sga.h and external.h. However, take care that you do not redeclare existing variables. Two example applications files are included in the SGA-C distribution. The file app1.c performs the simple example problem included with the Pascal version; finding the maximum of x 10 , where x is an integer interpretation of a chromosome. A slightly more complex application is include in app2.c. This application illustrates two features that have been added to SGA-C. The first of these is the ithruj2int function, which converts bits i through j in a chromosome to an integer. The second new feature is the utility pointer that is associated with each population member. The example application interprets each chromosome as a set of concatenated integers in binary form. The lengths of these integer fields is determined by the user-specified value of field size, which is read in by the function app data(). The field size must be less than the smallest of the chromosome length and the length of an unsigned integer. An integer array for storing the interpreted form of each chromosome is dynamically allocated and assigned to the chromosome's utility pointer in app malloc(). The ithruj2int routine (see utility.c) is used to translate each chromosome into its associated vector. The fitness for each chromosome is simply the sum of the squares of these integers. This example application will function for any chromosome length. SGA-C is intended to be a simple program for first-time GA experimentation. It is not intended to be definitive in terms of its efficiency or the grace of its implementation. The authors are interested in the comments, criticisms, and bug reports from SGA-C users, so that the code can be refined for easier use in subsequent versions. Please email your comments to rob@galab2.mh.ua.edu, or write to TCGA: The authors gratefully acknowledge support provided by NASA under Grant NGT-50224 and support provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant CTS-8451610. We also thank Hillol Kargupta for donating his tournament selection implementation. Booker, L. B. (1982). Intelligent behavior as an adaptation to the task environment (Doctoral dissertation, Technical Report No. 243. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Logic of Computers Group). Dissertations Abstracts International, 43(2), 469B. (University Microfilms No. 8214966) Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1120643. 	[Title] Genetic Algorithms as Multi-Coordinators in Large-Scale Optimization [Abstract] We present high-level, decomposition-based algorithms for large-scale block-angular optimization problems containing integer variables, and demonstrate their effectiveness in the solution of large-scale graph partitioning problems. These algorithms combine the subproblem-coordination paradigm (and lower bounds) of price-directive decomposition methods with knapsack and genetic approaches to the utilization of "building blocks" of partial solutions. Even for graph partitioning problems requiring billions of variables in a standard 0-1 formulation, this approach produces high-quality solutions (as measured by deviations from an easily computed lower bound), and substantially outperforms widely-used graph partitioning techniques based on heuristics and spectral methods. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #45605. 	[Title] Learning and evolution in neural networks [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #100935. 	[Title] Distribution Category:  Users Guide to the PGAPack Parallel Genetic Algorithm Library [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #85352. 	[Title] Evolution in Time and Space The Parallel Genetic Algorithm [Abstract] The parallel genetic algorithm (PGA) uses two major modifications compared to the genetic algorithm. Firstly, selection for mating is distributed. Individuals live in a 2-D world. Selection of a mate is done by each individual independently in its neighborhood. Secondly, each individual may improve its fitness during its lifetime by e.g. local hill-climbing. The PGA is totally asynchronous, running with maximal efficiency on MIMD parallel computers. The search strategy of the PGA is based on a small number of active and intelligent individuals, whereas a GA uses a large population of passive individuals. We will investigate the PGA with deceptive problems and the traveling salesman problem. We outline why and when the PGA is succesful. Abstractly, a PGA is a parallel search with information exchange between the individuals. If we represent the optimization problem as a fitness landscape in a certain configuration space, we see, that a PGA tries to jump from two local minima to a third, still better local minima, by using the crossover operator. This jump is (probabilistically) successful, if the fitness landscape has a certain correlation. We show the correlation for the traveling salesman problem by a configuration space analysis. The PGA explores implicitly the above correlation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #8874. 	[Title] A Cooperative Coevolutionary Approach to Function Optimization [Abstract] A general model for the coevolution of cooperating species is presented. This model is instantiated and tested in the domain of function optimization, and compared with a traditional GA-based function optimizer. The results are encouraging in two respects. They suggest ways in which the performance of GA and other EA-based optimizers can be improved, and they suggest a new approach to evolving complex structures such as neural networks and rule sets. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1133196. 	[Title] Analysis of the Numerical Effects of Parallelism on a Parallel Genetic Algorithm [Abstract] This paper examines the effects of relaxed synchronization on both the numerical and parallel efficiency of parallel genetic algorithms (GAs). We describe a coarse-grain geographically structured parallel genetic algorithm. Our experiments provide preliminary evidence that asynchronous versions of these algorithms have a lower run time than synchronous GAs. Our analysis shows that this improvement is due to (1) decreased synchronization costs and (2) high numerical efficiency (e.g. fewer function evaluations) for the asynchronous GAs. This analysis includes a critique of the utility of traditional parallel performance measures for parallel GAs. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #48781. 	[Title] Optimal and Asymptotically Optimal Equi-partition of Rectangular Domains via Stripe Decomposition [Abstract] We present an efficient method for assigning any number of processors to tasks associated with the cells of a rectangular uniform grid. Load balancing equi-partition constraints are observed while approximately minimizing the total perimeter of the partition, which corresponds to the amount of interprocessor communication. This method is based upon decomposition of the grid into stripes of "optimal" height. We prove that under some mild assumptions, as the problem size grows large in all parameters, the error bound associated with this feasible solution approaches zero. We also present computational results from a high level parallel Genetic Algorithm that utilizes this method, and make comparisons with other methods. On a network of workstations, our algorithm solves within minutes instances of the problem that would require one billion binary variables in a Quadratic Assignment formulation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #195792. 	[Title] A Comparison between Cellular Encoding and Direct Encoding for Genetic Neural Networks [Abstract] This paper compares the efficiency of two encoding schemes for Artificial Neural Networks optimized by evolutionary algorithms. Direct Encoding encodes the weights for an a priori fixed neural network architecture. Cellular Encoding encodes both weights and the architecture of the neural network. In previous studies, Direct Encoding and Cellular Encoding have been used to create neural networks for balancing 1 and 2 poles attached to a cart on a fixed track. The poles are balanced by a controller that pushes the cart to the left or the right. In some cases velocity information about the pole and cart is provided as an input; in other cases the network must learn to balance a single pole without velocity information. A careful study of the behavior of these systems suggests that it is possible to balance a single pole with velocity information as an input and without learning to compute the velocity. A new fitness function is introduced that forces the neural network to compute the velocity. By using this new fitness function and tuning the syntactic constraints used with cellular encoding, we achieve a tenfold speedup over our previous study and solve a more difficult problem: balancing two poles when no information about the velocity is provided as input. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #397488. 	[Title] Fast EquiPartitioning of Rectangular Domains using Stripe Decomposition [Abstract] This paper presents a fast algorithm that provides optimal or near optimal solutions to the minimum perimeter problem on a rectangular grid. The minimum perimeter problem is to partition a grid of size M N into P equal area regions while minimizing the total perimeter of the regions. The approach taken here is to divide the grid into stripes that can be filled completely with an integer number of regions . This striping method gives rise to a knapsack integer program that can be efficiently solved by existing codes. The solution of the knapsack problem is then used to generate the grid region assignments. An implementation of the algorithm partitioned a 1000 1000 grid into 1000 regions to a provably optimal solution in less than one second. With sufficient memory to hold the M N grid array, extremely large minimum perimeter problems can be solved easily. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35061. 	[Title] Evolving Networks: Using the Genetic Algorithm with Connectionist Learning [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #682815. 	[Title] The Role of Development in Genetic Algorithms [Abstract] Technical Report Number CS94-394 Computer Science and Engineering, U.C.S.D. Abstract The developmental mechanisms transforming genotypic to phenotypic forms are typically omitted in formulations of genetic algorithms (GAs) in which these two representational spaces are identical. We argue that a careful analysis of developmental mechanisms is useful when understanding the success of several standard GA techniques, and can clarify the relationships between more recently proposed enhancements. We provide a framework which distinguishes between two developmental mechanisms | learning and maturation | while also showing several common effects on GA search. This framework is used to analyze how maturation and local search can change the dynamics of the GA. We observe that in some contexts, maturation and local search can be incorporated into the fitness evaluation, but illustrate reasons for considering them seperately. Further, we identify contexts in which maturation and local search can be distinguished from the fitness evaluation. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #175256 has the title `Adaptive Global Optimization with Local Search  
` and the abstract `nan`.
Question: Which category should Paper #175256 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #175256 has the title `Adaptive Global Optimization with Local Search  
` and the abstract `nan`.
Question: Which category should Paper #175256 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Genetic_Algorithms