Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #337766. 	[Title] Learning to Refine Indexing by Introspective Reasoning [Abstract] A significant problem for case-based reasoning (CBR) systems is deciding what features to use in judging case similarity for retrieval. We describe research that addresses the feature selection problem by using introspective reasoning to learn new features for indexing. Our method augments the CBR system with an introspective reasoning component which monitors system performance to detect poor retrievals, identifies features which would lead to retrieving cases requiring less adaptation, and refines the indices to include such features in order to avoid similar future failures. We explore the benefit of introspective reasoning by performing empirical tests on the implemented system. These tests examine the benefits of introspective index refinement and the effects of problem order on case and index learning, and show that introspective learning of new index features improves overall performance across the range of different problem orders. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #110162. 	[Title] Case-Based Similarity Assessment: Estimating Adaptability from Experience [Abstract] Case-based problem-solving systems rely on similarity assessment to select stored cases whose solutions are easily adaptable to fit current problems. However, widely-used similarity assessment strategies, such as evaluation of semantic similarity, can be poor predictors of adaptability. As a result, systems may select cases that are difficult or impossible for them to adapt, even when easily adaptable cases are available in memory. This paper presents a new similarity assessment approach which couples similarity judgments directly to a case library containing the system's adaptation knowledge. It examines this approach in the context of a case-based planning system that learns both new plans and new adaptations. Empirical tests of alternative similarity assessment strategies show that this approach enables better case selection and increases the benefits accrued from learned adaptations. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #110163. 	[Title] Learning to Integrate Multiple Knowledge Sources for Case-Based Reasoning [Abstract] The case-based reasoning process depends on multiple overlapping knowledge sources, each of which provides an opportunity for learning. Exploiting these opportunities requires not only determining the learning mechanisms to use for each individual knowledge source, but also how the different learning mechanisms interact and their combined utility. This paper presents a case study examining the relative contributions and costs involved in learning processes for three different knowledge sources|cases, case adaptation knowledge, and similarity information|in a case-based planner. It demonstrates the importance of interactions between different learning processes and identifies a promising method for integrating multiple learning methods to improve case-based reasoning. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #110164. 	[Title] A Case Study of Case-Based CBR [Abstract] Case-based reasoning depends on multiple knowledge sources beyond the case library, including knowledge about case adaptation and criteria for similarity assessment. Because hand coding this knowledge accounts for a large part of the knowledge acquisition burden for developing CBR systems, it is appealing to acquire it by learning, and CBR is a promising learning method to apply. This observation suggests developing case-based CBR systems, CBR systems whose components themselves use CBR. However, despite early interest in case-based approaches to CBR, this method has received comparatively little attention. Open questions include how case-based components of a CBR system should be designed, the amount of knowledge acquisition effort they require, and their effectiveness. This paper investigates these questions through a case study of issues addressed, methods used, and results achieved by a case-based planning system that uses CBR to guide its case adaptation and similarity assessment. The paper discusses design considerations and presents empirical results that support the usefulness of case-based CBR, that point to potential problems and tradeoffs, and that directly demonstrate the overlapping roles of different CBR knowledge sources. The paper closes with general lessons about case-based CBR and areas for future research. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #3095. 	[Title] Constructive Similarity Assessment: Using Stored Cases to Define New Situations [Abstract] A fundamental issue in case-based reasoning is similarity assessment: determining similarities and differences between new and retrieved cases. Many methods have been developed for comparing input case descriptions to the cases already in memory. However, the success of such methods depends on the input case description being sufficiently complete to reflect the important features of the new situation, which is not assured. In case-based explanation of anomalous events during story understanding, the anomaly arises because the current situation is incompletely understood; consequently, similarity assessment based on matches between known current features and old cases is likely to fail because of gaps in the current case's description. Our solution to the problem of gaps in a new case's description is an approach that we call constructive similarity assessment. Constructive similarity assessment treats similarity assessment not as a simple comparison between fixed new and old cases, but as a process for deciding which types of features should be investigated in the new situation and, if the features are borne out by other knowledge, added to the description of the current case. Constructive similarity assessment does not merely compare new cases to old: using prior cases as its guide, it dynamically carves augmented descriptions of new cases out of memory. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #3101. 	[Title] Acquiring Case Adaptation Knowledge: A Hybrid Approach [Abstract] The ability of case-based reasoning (CBR) systems to apply cases to novel situations depends on their case adaptation knowledge. However, endowing CBR systems with adequate adaptation knowledge has proven to be a very difficult task. This paper describes a hybrid method for performing case adaptation, using a combination of rule-based and case-based reasoning. It shows how this approach provides a framework for acquiring flexible adaptation knowledge from experiences with autonomous adaptation and suggests its potential as a basis for acquisition of adaptation knowledge from interactive user guidance. It also presents initial experimental results examining the benefits of the approach and comparing the relative contributions of case learning and adaptation learning to reasoning performance. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #337766 has the title `Learning to Refine Indexing by Introspective Reasoning  
` and the abstract `A significant problem for case-based reasoning (CBR) systems is deciding what features to use in judging case similarity for retrieval. We describe research that addresses the feature selection problem by using introspective reasoning to learn new features for indexing. Our method augments the CBR system with an introspective reasoning component which monitors system performance to detect poor retrievals, identifies features which would lead to retrieving cases requiring less adaptation, and refines the indices to include such features in order to avoid similar future failures. We explore the benefit of introspective reasoning by performing empirical tests on the implemented system. These tests examine the benefits of introspective index refinement and the effects of problem order on case and index learning, and show that introspective learning of new index features improves overall performance across the range of different problem orders.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #337766 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #337766 has the title `Learning to Refine Indexing by Introspective Reasoning  
` and the abstract `A significant problem for case-based reasoning (CBR) systems is deciding what features to use in judging case similarity for retrieval. We describe research that addresses the feature selection problem by using introspective reasoning to learn new features for indexing. Our method augments the CBR system with an introspective reasoning component which monitors system performance to detect poor retrievals, identifies features which would lead to retrieving cases requiring less adaptation, and refines the indices to include such features in order to avoid similar future failures. We explore the benefit of introspective reasoning by performing empirical tests on the implemented system. These tests examine the benefits of introspective index refinement and the effects of problem order on case and index learning, and show that introspective learning of new index features improves overall performance across the range of different problem orders.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #337766 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Case_Based