Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #14545. 	[Title] A Patient-Adaptive Neural Network ECG Patient Monitoring Algorithm [Abstract] The patient-adaptive classifier was compared with a well-established baseline algorithm on six major databases, consisting of over 3 million heartbeats. When trained on an initial 77 records and tested on an additional 382 records, the patient-adaptive algorithm was found to reduce the number of Vn errors on one channel by a factor of 5, and the number of Nv errors by a factor of 10. We conclude that patient adaptation provides a significant advance in classifying normal vs. ventricular beats for ECG Patient Monitoring. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #14529. 	[Title] Concept Learning and Flexible Weighting [Abstract] We previously introduced an exemplar model, named GCM-ISW, that exploits a highly flexible weighting scheme. Our simulations showed that it records faster learning rates and higher asymptotic accuracies on several artificial categorization tasks than models with more limited abilities to warp input spaces. This paper extends our previous work; it describes experimental results that suggest human subjects also invoke such highly flexible schemes. In particular, our model provides significantly better fits than models with less flexibility, and we hypothesize that humans selectively weight attributes depending on an item's location in the input space. We need more flexible models Many theories of human concept learning posit that concepts are represented by prototypes (Reed, 1972) or exemplars (Medin & Schaffer, 1978). Prototype models represent concepts by the "best example" or "central tendency" of the concept. 1 A new item belongs in a category C if it is relatively similar to C's prototype. Prototype models are relatively inflexible; they discard a great deal of information that people use during concept learning (e.g., the number of exemplars in a concept (Homa & Cultice, 1984), the variability of features (Fried & Holyoak, 1984), correlations between features (Medin et al., 1982), and the particular exemplars used (Whittlesea, 1987)). of concept learning Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #14531. 	[Title] Context-Sensitive Feature Selection for Lazy Learners [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #7047. 	[Title] Learning One More Thing [Abstract] Most research on machine learning has focused on scenarios in which a learner faces a single, isolated learning task. The lifelong learning framework assumes that the learner encounters a multitude of related learning tasks over its lifetime, providing the opportunity for the transfer of knowledge among these. This paper studies lifelong learning in the context of binary classification. It presents the invariance approach, in which knowledge is transferred via a learned model of the invariances of the domain. Results on learning to recognize objects from color images demonstrate superior generalization capabilities if invariances are learned and used to bias subsequent learning. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #592830. 	[Title] Context-sensitive attribute estimation in regression [Abstract] One of key issues in both discrete and continuous class prediction and in machine learning in general seems to be the problem of estimating the quality of attributes. Heuristic measures mostly assume independence of attributes so their use is non-optimal in domains with strong dependencies between attributes. For the same reason they are also mostly unable to recognize context dependent features. Relief and its extension Re-liefF are statistical methods capable of correctly estimating the quality of attributes in classification problems with strong dependencies between attributes. By exploiting local information provided by different contexts they provide a global view and recognize contextual attributes. After the analysis of ReliefF we have extended it to continuous class problems. Regressional ReliefF (RReliefF) and ReliefF provide a unified view on estimating attribute quality. The experiments show that RReliefF correctly estimates the quality of attributes, recognizes the contextual attributes and can be used for non myopic learning of the regression trees. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #14549. 	[Title] Recognition and Exploitation of Contextual Clues via Incremental Meta-Learning (Extended Version) [Abstract] Daily experience shows that in the real world, the meaning of many concepts heavily depends on some implicit context, and changes in that context can cause more or less radical changes in the concepts. Incremental concept learning in such domains requires the ability to recognize and adapt to such changes. This paper presents a solution for incremental learning tasks where the domain provides explicit clues as to the current context (e.g., attributes with characteristic values). We present a general two-level learning model, and its realization in a system named MetaL(B), that can learn to detect certain types of contextual clues, and can react accordingly when a context change is suspected. The model consists of a base level learner that performs the regular on-line learning and classification task, and a meta-learner that identifies potential contextual clues. Context learning and detection occur during regular on-line learning, without separate training phases for context recognition. Experiments with synthetic domains as well as a `real-world' problem show that MetaL(B) is robust in a variety of dimensions and produces substantial improvement over simple object-level learning in situations with changing contexts. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #31479. 	[Title] Induction of Selective Bayesian Classifiers [Abstract] In this paper, we examine previous work on the naive Bayesian classifier and review its limitations, which include a sensitivity to correlated features. We respond to this problem by embedding the naive Bayesian induction scheme within an algorithm that carries out a greedy search through the space of features. We hypothesize that this approach will improve asymptotic accuracy in domains that involve correlated features without reducing the rate of learning in ones that do not. We report experimental results on six natural domains, including comparisons with decision-tree induction, that support these hypotheses. In closing, we discuss other approaches to extending naive Bayesian classifiers and outline some directions for future research. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1103038. 	[Title] The Management of Context-Sensitive Features: A Review of Strategies [Abstract] In this paper, we review five heuristic strategies for handling context-sensitive features in supervised machine learning from examples. We discuss two methods for recovering lost (implicit) contextual information. We mention some evidence that hybrid strategies can have a synergetic effect. We then show how the work of several machine learning researchers fits into this framework. While we do not claim that these strategies exhaust the possibilities, it appears that the framework includes all of the techniques that can be found in the published literature on context sensitive learning. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #51934. 	[Title] Synthesize, Optimize, Analyze, Repeat (SOAR): Application of Neural Network Tools to ECG Patient Monitoring [Abstract] Results are reported from the application of tools for synthesizing, optimizing and analyzing neural networks to an ECG Patient Monitoring task. A neural network was synthesized from a rule-based classifier and optimized over a set of normal and abnormal heartbeats. The classification error rate on a separate and larger test set was reduced by a factor of 2. Sensitivity analysis of the synthesized and optimized networks revealed informative differences. Analysis of the weights and unit activations of the optimized network enabled a reduction in size of the network by a factor of 40% without loss of accuracy. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #14545 has the title `A Patient-Adaptive Neural Network ECG Patient Monitoring Algorithm  
` and the abstract `The patient-adaptive classifier was compared with a well-established baseline algorithm on six major databases, consisting of over 3 million heartbeats. When trained on an initial 77 records and tested on an additional 382 records, the patient-adaptive algorithm was found to reduce the number of Vn errors on one channel by a factor of 5, and the number of Nv errors by a factor of 10. We conclude that patient adaptation provides a significant advance in classifying normal vs. ventricular beats for ECG Patient Monitoring. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #14545 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #14545 has the title `A Patient-Adaptive Neural Network ECG Patient Monitoring Algorithm  
` and the abstract `The patient-adaptive classifier was compared with a well-established baseline algorithm on six major databases, consisting of over 3 million heartbeats. When trained on an initial 77 records and tested on an additional 382 records, the patient-adaptive algorithm was found to reduce the number of Vn errors on one channel by a factor of 5, and the number of Nv errors by a factor of 10. We conclude that patient adaptation provides a significant advance in classifying normal vs. ventricular beats for ECG Patient Monitoring. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #14545 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Neural_Networks