Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #590022. 	[Title] Fall Diagnosis using Dynamic Belief Networks [Abstract] The task is to monitor walking patterns and give early warning of falls using foot switch and mercury trigger sensors. We describe a dynamic belief network model for fall diagnosis which, given evidence from sensor observations, outputs beliefs about the current walking status and makes predictions regarding future falls. The model represents possible sensor error and is parametrised to allow customisation to the individual being monitored. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #189856. 	[Title] State-Space Abstraction for Anytime Evaluation of Probabilistic Networks [Abstract] One important factor determining the computa - tional complexity of evaluating a probabilistic network is the cardinality of the state spaces of the nodes. By varying the granularity of the state spaces, one can trade off accuracy in the result for computational efficiency. We present an any - time procedure for approximate evaluation of probabilistic networks based on this idea. On application to some simple networks, the proce - dure exhibits a smooth improvement in approxi - mation quality as computation time increases. This suggests that statespace abstraction is one more useful control parameter for designing real-time probabilistic reasoners. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #37888. 	[Title] Stochastic simulation algorithms for dynamic probabilistic networks [Abstract] Stochastic simulation algorithms such as likelihood weighting often give fast, accurate approximations to posterior probabilities in probabilistic networks, and are the methods of choice for very large networks. Unfortunately, the special characteristics of dynamic probabilistic networks (DPNs), which are used to represent stochastic temporal processes, mean that standard simulation algorithms perform very poorly. In essence, the simulation trials diverge further and further from reality as the process is observed over time. In this paper, we present simulation algorithms that use the evidence observed at each time step to push the set of trials back towards reality. The first algorithm, "evidence reversal" (ER) restructures each time slice of the DPN so that the evidence nodes for the slice become ancestors of the state variables. The second algorithm, called "survival of the fittest" sampling (SOF), "repopulates" the set of trials at each time step using a stochastic reproduction rate weighted by the likelihood of the evidence according to each trial. We compare the performance of each algorithm with likelihood weighting on the original network, and also investigate the benefits of combining the ER and SOF methods. The ER/SOF combination appears to maintain bounded error independent of the number of time steps in the simulation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #36802. 	[Title] Dynamic Belief Networks for Discrete Monitoring [Abstract] We describe the development of a monitoring system which uses sensor observation data about discrete events to construct dynamically a probabilistic model of the world. This model is a Bayesian network incorporating temporal aspects, which we call a Dynamic Belief Network; it is used to reason under uncertainty about both the causes and consequences of the events being monitored. The basic dynamic construction of the network is data-driven. However the model construction process combines sensor data about events with externally provided information about agents' behaviour, and knowledge already contained within the model, to control the size and complexity of the network. This means that both the network structure within a time interval, and the amount of history and detail maintained, can vary over time. We illustrate the system with the example domain of monitoring robot vehicles and people in a restricted dynamic environment using light-beam sensor data. In addition to presenting a generic network structure for monitoring domains, we describe the use of more complex network structures which address two specific monitoring problems, sensor validation and the Data Association Problem. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #589923. 	[Title] A case study in dynamic belief networks: monitoring walking, fall prediction and detection [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #130. 	[Title] Scaling Up Average Reward Reinforcement Learning by Approximating the Domain Models and the Value Function [Abstract] Almost all the work in Average-reward Re- inforcement Learning (ARL) so far has focused on table-based methods which do not scale to domains with large state spaces. In this paper, we propose two extensions to a model-based ARL method called H-learning to address the scale-up problem. We extend H-learning to learn action models and reward functions in the form of Bayesian networks, and approximate its value function using local linear regression. We test our algorithms on several scheduling tasks for a simulated Automatic Guided Vehicle (AGV) and show that they are effective in significantly reducing the space requirement of H-learning and making it converge faster. To the best of our knowledge, our results are the first in apply Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1108389. 	[Title] Structured Arc Reversal and Simulation of Dynamic Probabilistic Networks [Abstract] We present an algorithm for arc reversal in Bayesian networks with tree-structured conditional probability tables, and consider some of its advantages, especially for the simulation of dynamic probabilistic networks. In particular, the method allows one to produce CPTs for nodes involved in the reversal that exploit regularities in the conditional distributions. We argue that this approach alleviates some of the overhead associated with arc reversal, plays an important role in evidence integration and can be used to restrict sampling of variables in DPNs. We also provide an algorithm that detects the dynamic irrelevance of state variables in forward simulation. This algorithm exploits the structured CPTs in a reversed network to determine, in a time-independent fashion, the conditions under which a variable does or does not need to be sampled. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #149669. 	[Title] Reasoning about Time and Probability [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #36131. 	[Title] Adaptive probabilistic networks [Abstract] Belief networks (or probabilistic networks) and neural networks are two forms of network representations that have been used in the development of intelligent systems in the field of artificial intelligence. Belief networks provide a concise representation of general probability distributions over a set of random variables, and facilitate exact calculation of the impact of evidence on propositions of interest. Neural networks, which represent parameterized algebraic combinations of nonlinear activation functions, have found widespread use as models of real neural systems and as function approximators because of their amenability to simple training algorithms. Furthermore, the simple, local nature of most neural network training algorithms provides a certain biological plausibility and allows for a massively parallel implementation. In this paper, we show that similar local learning algorithms can be derived for belief networks, and that these learning algorithms can operate using only information that is directly available from the normal, inferential processes of the networks. This removes the main obstacle preventing belief networks from competing with neural networks on the above-mentioned tasks. The precise, local, probabilistic interpretation of belief networks also allows them to be partially or wholly constructed by humans; allows the results of learning to be easily understood; and allows them to contribute to rational decision-making in a well-defined way. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1129994. 	[Title] Sonderforschungsbereich 314 K unstliche Intelligenz Wissensbasierte Systeme KI-Labor am Lehrstuhl f ur Informatik IV Numerical [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #77438. 	[Title] The BATmobile: Towards a Bayesian Automated Taxi [Abstract] The problem of driving an autonomous vehicle in highway traffic engages many areas of AI research and has substantial economic significance. We describe work in progress on a new approach to this problem based on a decision-theoretic architecture using dynamic probabilistic networks. The architecture provides a sound solution to the problems of sensor noise, sensor failure, and uncertainty about the behavior of other vehicles and about the effects of one's own actions. Our approach has been implemented in a computer simulation system, and the autonomous vehicle successfully negotiates a variety of difficult situations. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1153262. 	[Title] Rationality and Intelligence [Abstract] The long-term goal of our field is the creation and understanding of intelligence. Productive research in AI, both practical and theoretical, benefits from a notion of intelligence that is precise enough to allow the cumulative development of robust systems and general results. The concept of rational agency has long been considered a leading candidate to fulfill this role. This paper outlines a gradual evolution in the formal conception of rationality that brings it closer to our informal conception of intelligence and simultaneously reduces the gap between theory and practice. Some directions for future research are indicated. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #293974. 	[Title] Tractable Inference for Complex Stochastic Processes [Abstract] The monitoring and control of any dynamic system depends crucially on the ability to reason about its current status and its future trajectory. In the case of a stochastic system, these tasks typically involve the use of a belief statea probability distribution over the state of the process at a given point in time. Unfortunately, the state spaces of complex processes are very large, making an explicit representation of a belief state intractable. Even in dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs), where the process itself can be represented compactly, the representation of the belief state is intractable. We investigate the idea of maintaining a compact approximation to the true belief state, and analyze the conditions under which the errors due to the approximations taken over the lifetime of the process do not accumulate to make our answers completely irrelevant. We show that the error in a belief state contracts exponentially as the process evolves. Thus, even with multiple approximations, the error in our process remains bounded indefinitely. We show how the additional structure of a DBN can be used to design our approximation scheme, improving its performance significantly. We demonstrate the applicability of our ideas in the context of a monitoring task, showing that orders of magnitude faster inference can be achieved with only a small degradation in accuracy. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1152633. 	[Title]  [Abstract] MOU 130: Feasibility study of fully autonomous vehicles using decision-theoretic control Final Report Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #189566. 	[Title] Introduction to the Special Section on Knowledge-Based Construction of Probabilistic and Decision Models (IEEE Transactions [Abstract] Modeling techniques developed recently in the AI and uncertain reasoning communities permit significantly more flexible specifications of probabilistic knowledge. Specifically, graphical decision-modeling formalisms|belief networks, influence diagrams, and their variants|provide compact representation of probabilistic relationships, and support inference algorithms that automatically exploit the dependence structure in such models [1, 3, 4]. These advances have brought on a resurgence of interest in computational decision systems based on normative theories of belief and preference. However, graphical decision-modeling languages are still quite limited for purposes of knowledge representation because, while they can describe the relationships among particular event instances, they cannot capture general knowledge about probabilistic relationships across classes of events. The inability to capture general knowledge is a serious impediment for those AI tasks in which the relevant factors of a decision problem cannot be enumerated in advance. A graphical decision model encodes a particular set of probabilistic dependencies, a predefined set of decision alternatives, and a specific mathematical form for a utility function. Given a properly specified model, there exist relatively efficient algorithms for calculating posterior probabilities and optimal decision policies. A range of similar cases may be handled by parametric variations of the original model. However, if the structure of dependencies, the set of available alternatives, or the form of utility function changes from situation to situation, then a fixed network representation is no longer adequate. An ideal computational decision system would possess general, broad knowledge of a domain, but would have the ability to reason about the particular circumstances of any given decision problem within the domain. One obvious approach|which we call call knowledge-based model construction (KBMC)|is to generate a decision model dynamically at run-time, based on the problem description and information received thus far. Model construction consists of selection, instantiation, and assembly of causal and associational relationships from a broad knowledge base of general relationships among domain concepts. For example, suppose we wish to develop a system to recommend appropriate actions for maintaining a computer network. The natural graphical decision model would include chance Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #158172. 	[Title] Space-efficient inference in dynamic probabilistic networks [Abstract] Dynamic probabilistic networks (DPNs) are a useful tool for modeling complex stochastic processes. The simplest inference task in DPNs is monitoring | that is, computing a posterior distribution for the state variables at each time step given all observations up to that time. Recursive, constant-space algorithms are well-known for monitoring in DPNs and other models. This paper is concerned with hindsight | that is, computing a posterior distribution given both past and future observations. Hindsight is an essential subtask of learning DPN models from data. Existing algorithms for hindsight in DPNs use O(SN ) space and time, where N is the total length of the observation sequence and S is the state space size for each time step. They are therefore impractical for hindsight in complex models with long observation sequences. This paper presents an O(S log N ) space, O(SN log N ) time hindsight algorithm. We demonstrates the effectiveness of the algorithm in two real-world DPN learning problems. We also discuss the possibility of an O(S)-space, O(SN )-time algorithm. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #106590. 	[Title] Accounting for Context in Plan Recognition, with Application to Traffic Monitoring [Abstract] Typical approaches to plan recognition start from a representation of an agent's possible plans, and reason evidentially from observations of the agent's actions to assess the plausibility of the various candidates. A more expansive view of the task (consistent with some prior work) accounts for the context in which the plan was generated, the mental state and planning process of the agent, and consequences of the agent's actions in the world. We present a general Bayesian framework encompassing this view, and focus on how context can be exploited in plan recognition. We demonstrate the approach on a problem in traffic monitoring, where the objective is to induce the plan of the driver from observation of vehicle movements. Starting from a model of how the driver generates plans, we show how the highway context can appropriately influence the recognizer's interpretation of observed driver behavior. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #590022 has the title `Fall Diagnosis using Dynamic Belief Networks  
` and the abstract `The task is to monitor walking patterns and give early warning of falls using foot switch and mercury trigger sensors. We describe a dynamic belief network model for fall diagnosis which, given evidence from sensor observations, outputs beliefs about the current walking status and makes predictions regarding future falls. The model represents possible sensor error and is parametrised to allow customisation to the individual being monitored.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #590022 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #590022 has the title `Fall Diagnosis using Dynamic Belief Networks  
` and the abstract `The task is to monitor walking patterns and give early warning of falls using foot switch and mercury trigger sensors. We describe a dynamic belief network model for fall diagnosis which, given evidence from sensor observations, outputs beliefs about the current walking status and makes predictions regarding future falls. The model represents possible sensor error and is parametrised to allow customisation to the individual being monitored.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #590022 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Probabilistic_Methods