Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #84459. 	[Title] Learning Concepts from Sensor Data of a Mobile Robot [Abstract] Machine learning can be a most valuable tool for improving the flexibility and efficiency of robot applications. Many approaches to applying machine learning to robotics are known. Some approaches enhance the robot's high-level processing, the planning capabilities. Other approaches enhance the low-level processing, the control of basic actions. In contrast, the approach presented in this paper uses machine learning for enhancing the link between the low-level representations of sensing and action and the high-level representation of planning. The aim is to facilitate the communication between the robot and the human user. A hierarchy of concepts is learned from route records of a mobile robot. Perception and action are combined at every level, i.e., the concepts are perceptually anchored. The relational learning algorithm grdt has been developed which completely searches in a hypothesis space, that is restricted by rule schemata, which the user defines in terms of grammars. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #31043. 	[Title] FONN: Combining First Order Logic with Connectionist Learning [Abstract] This paper presents a neural network architecture that can manage structured data and refine knowledge bases expressed in a first order logic language. The presented framework is well suited to classification problems in which concept de scriptions depend upon numerical features of the data. In fact, the main goal of the neural architecture is that of refining the numerical part of the knowledge base, without changing its structure. In particular, we discuss a method to translate a set of classification rules into neural computation units. Here, we focus our attention on the translation method and on algorithms to refine network weights on struc tured data. The classification theory to be refined can be manually handcrafted or automatically acquired by a symbolic relational learning system able to deal with numerical features. As a matter of fact, the primary goal is to bring into a neural network architecture the capability of dealing with structured data of unrestricted size, by allowing to dynamically bind the classification rules to different items occur ring in the input data. An extensive experimentation on a challenging artificial case study shows that the network converges quite fastly and generalizes much better than propositional learners on an equivalent task definition. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #13917. 	[Title] Designing Neural Networks for Adaptive Control [Abstract] This paper discusses the design of neural networks to solve specific problems of adaptive control. In particular, it investigates the influence of typical problems arising in real-world control tasks as well as techniques for their solution that exist in the framework of neurocontrol. Based on this investigation, a systematic design method is developed. The method is exemplified for the development of an adaptive force controller for a robot manipulator. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #90888. 	[Title] GAL: Networks that grow when they learn and shrink when they forget [Abstract] Learning when limited to modification of some parameters has a limited scope; the capability to modify the system structure is also needed to get a wider range of the learnable. In the case of artificial neural networks, learning by iterative adjustment of synaptic weights can only succeed if the network designer predefines an appropriate network structure, i.e., number of hidden layers, units, and the size and shape of their receptive and projective fields. This paper advocates the view that the network structure should not, as usually done, be determined by trial-and-error but should be computed by the learning algorithm. Incremental learning algorithms can modify the network structure by addition and/or removal of units and/or links. A survey of current connectionist literature is given on this line of thought. "Grow and Learn" (GAL) is a new algorithm that learns an association at one-shot due to being incremental and using a local representation. During the so-called "sleep" phase, units that were previously stored but which are no longer necessary due to recent modifications are removed to minimize network complexity. The incrementally constructed network can later be finetuned off-line to improve performance. Another method proposed that greatly increases recognition accuracy is to train a number of networks and vote over their responses. The algorithm and its variants are tested on recognition of handwritten numerals and seem promising especially in terms of learning speed. This makes the algorithm attractive for on-line learning tasks, e.g., in robotics. The biological plausibility of incremental learning is also discussed briefly. Earlier part of this work was realized at the Laboratoire de Microinformatique of Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne and was supported by the Fonds National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique. Later part was realized at and supported by the International Computer Science Institute. A number of people helped by guiding, stimulating discussions or questions: Subutai Ahmad, Peter Clarke, Jerry Feldman, Christian Jutten, Pierre Marchal, Jean Daniel Nicoud, Steve Omohondro and Leon Personnaz. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #10793. 	[Title] Learning Finite Automata Using Local Distinguishing Experiments [Abstract] One of the open problems listed in [ Rivest and Schapire, 1989 ] is whether and how that the copies of L fl in their algorithm can be combined into one for better performance. This paper describes an algorithm called D fl that does that combination. The idea is to represent the states of the learned model using observable symbols as well as hidden symbols that are constructed during learning. These hidden symbols are created to reflect the distinct behaviors of the model states. The distinct behaviors are represented as local distinguishing experiments (LDEs) (not to be confused with global distinguishing sequences), and these LDEs are created when the learner's prediction mismatches the actual observation from the unknown machine. To synchronize the model with the environment, these LDEs can also be concatenated to form a homing sequence. It can be shown that D fl can learn, with probability 1 , a model that is an *-approximation of the unknown machine, in a number of actions polynomial in the size of the environment and Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #4584. 	[Title] References elements that can solve difficult learning control problems. on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pages [Abstract] Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63(2):81-97. Schmidhuber, J. (1990b). Towards compositional learning with dynamic neural networks. Technical Report FKI-129-90, Technische Universitat Munchen, Institut fu Informatik. Servan-Schreiber, D., Cleermans, A., and McClelland, J. (1988). Encoding sequential structure in simple recurrent networks. Technical Report CMU-CS-88-183, Carnegie Mellon University, Computer Science Department. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1130356. 	[Title] Learning from the Environment by Experimentation: The Need for Few and Informative Examples [Abstract] An intelligent system must be able to adapt and learn to correct and update its model of the environment incrementally and deliberately. In complex environments that have many parameters and where interactions have a cost, sampling the possible range of states to test the results of action executions is not a practical approach. We present a practical approach based on continuous and selective interaction with the environment that pinpoints the type of fault in the domain knowledge that causes any unexpected behavior of the environment, and resorts to experimentation when additional information is needed to correct the system's knowledge. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1123991. 	[Title] Bayesian Probability Theory A General Method for Machine Learning [Abstract] This paper argues that Bayesian probability theory is a general method for machine learning. From two well-founded axioms, the theory is capable of accomplishing learning tasks that are incremental or non-incremental, supervised or unsupervised. It can learn from different types of data, regardless of whether they are noisy or perfect, independent facts or behaviors of an unknown machine. These capabilities are (partially) demonstrated in the paper through the uniform application of the theory to two typical types of machine learning: incremental concept learning and unsupervised data classification. The generality of the theory suggests that the process of learning may not have so many different "types" as currently held, and the method that is the oldest may be the best after all. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1104379. 	[Title] GA-RBF: A Self-Optimising RBF Network [Abstract] The effects of a neural network's topology on its performance are well known, yet the question of finding optimal configurations automatically remains largely open. This paper proposes a solution to this problem for RBF networks. A self- optimising approach, driven by an evolutionary strategy, is taken. The algorithm uses output information and a computationally efficient approximation of RBF networks to optimise the K-means clustering process by co-evolving the two determinant parameters of the network's layout: the number of centroids and the centroids' positions. Empirical results demonstrate promise. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #13885. 	[Title] Learning Controllers for Industrial Robots [Abstract] One of the most significant cost factors in robotics applications is the design and development of real-time robot control software. Control theory helps when linear controllers have to be developed, but it doesn't sufficiently support the generation of non-linear controllers, although in many cases (such as in compliance control), nonlinear control is essential for achieving high performance. This paper discusses how Machine Learning has been applied to the design of (non-)linear controllers. Several alternative function approximators, including Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP), Radial Basis Function Networks (RBFNs), and Fuzzy Controllers are analyzed and compared, leading to the definition of two major families: Open Field Function Function Approximators and Locally Receptive Field Function Approximators. It is shown that RBFNs and Fuzzy Controllers bear strong similarities, and that both have a symbolic interpretation. This characteristics allows for applying both symbolic and statistic learning algorithms to synthesize the network layout from a set of examples and, possibly, some background knowledge. Three integrated learning algorithms, two of which are original, are described and evaluated on experimental test cases. The first test case is provided by a robot KUKA IR-361 engaged into the "peg-into-hole" task, whereas the second is represented by a classical prediction task on the Mackey-Glass time series. From the experimental comparison, it appears that both Fuzzy Controllers and RBFNs synthesised from examples are excellent approximators, and that, in practice, they can be even more accurate than MLPs. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #6238. 	[Title] Discovery as Autonomous Learning from the Environment [Abstract] Discovery involves collaboration among many intelligent activities. However, little is known about how and in what form such collaboration occurs. In this paper, a framework is proposed for autonomous systems that learn and discover from their environment. Within this framework, many intelligent activities such as perception, action, exploration, experimentation, learning, problem solving, and new term construction can be integrated in a coherent way. The framework is presented in detail through an implemented system called LIVE, and is evaluated through the performance of LIVE on several discovery tasks. The conclusion is that autonomous learning from the environment is a feasible approach for integrating the activities involved in a discovery process. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #42847. 	[Title] GROWING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS [Abstract] This paper presents and evaluates two algorithms for incrementally constructing Radial Basis Function Networks, a class of neural networks which looks more suitable for adtaptive control applications than the more popular backpropagation networks. The first algorithm has been derived by a previous method developed by Fritzke, while the second one has been inspired by the CART algorithm developed by Breiman for generation regression trees. Both algorithms proved to work well on a number of tests and exhibit comparable performances. An evaluation on the standard case study of the Mackey-Glass temporal series is reported. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #84459 has the title `Learning Concepts from Sensor Data of a Mobile Robot  
` and the abstract `Machine learning can be a most valuable tool for improving the flexibility and efficiency of robot applications. Many approaches to applying machine learning to robotics are known. Some approaches enhance the robot's high-level processing, the planning capabilities. Other approaches enhance the low-level processing, the control of basic actions. In contrast, the approach presented in this paper uses machine learning for enhancing the link between the low-level representations of sensing and action and the high-level representation of planning. The aim is to facilitate the communication between the robot and the human user. A hierarchy of concepts is learned from route records of a mobile robot. Perception and action are combined at every level, i.e., the concepts are perceptually anchored. The relational learning algorithm grdt has been developed which completely searches in a hypothesis space, that is restricted by rule schemata, which the user defines in terms of grammars. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #84459 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #84459 has the title `Learning Concepts from Sensor Data of a Mobile Robot  
` and the abstract `Machine learning can be a most valuable tool for improving the flexibility and efficiency of robot applications. Many approaches to applying machine learning to robotics are known. Some approaches enhance the robot's high-level processing, the planning capabilities. Other approaches enhance the low-level processing, the control of basic actions. In contrast, the approach presented in this paper uses machine learning for enhancing the link between the low-level representations of sensing and action and the high-level representation of planning. The aim is to facilitate the communication between the robot and the human user. A hierarchy of concepts is learned from route records of a mobile robot. Perception and action are combined at every level, i.e., the concepts are perceptually anchored. The relational learning algorithm grdt has been developed which completely searches in a hypothesis space, that is restricted by rule schemata, which the user defines in terms of grammars. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #84459 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Theory