Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #459206. 	[Title] Where Does the Good Stuff Go, and Why? How contextual semantics influences program structure in [Abstract] Using deliberately designed primitive sets, we investigate the relationship between context-based expression mechanisms and the size, height and density of genetic program trees during the evolutionary process. We show that contextual semantics influence the composition, location and flows of operative code in a program. In detail we analyze these dynamics and discuss the impact of our findings on micro-level descriptions of genetic programming. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #66563. 	[Title] An Experimental Analysis of Schema Creation, Propagation and Disruption in Genetic Programming [Abstract] In this paper we first review the main results in the theory of schemata in Genetic Programming (GP) and summarise a new GP schema theory which is based on a new definition of schema. Then we study the creation, propagation and disruption of this new form of schemata in real runs, for standard crossover, one-point crossover and selection only. Finally, we discuss these results in the light our GP schema theorem. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1123530. 	[Title] How Fitness Structure Affects Subsolution Acquisition in Genetic Programming [Abstract] We define fitness structure in genetic programming to be the mapping between the subprograms of a program and their respective fitness values. This paper shows how various fitness structures of a problem with independent subsolutions relate to the acquisition of sub-solutions. The rate of subsolution acquisition is found to be directly correlated with fitness structure whether that structure is uniform, linear or exponential. An understanding of fitness structure provides partial insight into the complicated relationship between fitness function and the outcome of genetic programming's search. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #459213. 	[Title] Using a Distance Metric on Genetic Programs to Understand Genetic Operators [Abstract] I describe a distance metric called "edit" distance which quantifies the syntactic difference between two genetic programs. In the context of one specific problem, the 6 bit multiplexor, I use the metric to analyze the amount of new material introduced by different crossover operators, the difference among the best individuals of a population and the difference among the best individuals and the rest of the population. The relationships between these data and run performance are imprecise but they are sufficiently interesting to encourage encourage further investigation into the use of edit distance. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #459214. 	[Title] The Impact of External Dependency in Genetic Programming Primitives [Abstract] Both control and data dependencies among primitives impact the behavioural consistency of subprograms in genetic programming solutions. Behavioural consistency in turn impacts the ability of genetic programming to identify and promote appropriate subprograms. We present the results of modelling dependency through a parameterized problem in which a subprogram exhibits internal and external dependency levels that change as the subprogram is successively combined into larger subsolutions. We find that the key difference between non-existent and "full" external dependency is a longer time to solution identification and a lower likelihood of success as shown by increased difficulty in identifying and promoting correct subprograms. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #459216. 	[Title] Neural Programming and an Internal Reinforcement Policy [Abstract] An important reason for the continued popularity of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in the machine learning community is that the gradient-descent backpropagation procedure gives ANNs a locally optimal change procedure and, in addition, a framework for understanding the ANN learning performance. Genetic programming (GP) is also a successful evolutionary learning technique that provides powerful parameterized primitive constructs. Unlike ANNs, though, GP does not have such a principled procedure for changing parts of the learned system based on its current performance. This paper introduces Neural Programming, a connectionist representation for evolving programs that maintains the benefits of GP. The connectionist model of Neural Programming allows for a regression credit-blame procedure in an evolutionary learning system. We describe a general method for an informed feedback mechanism for Neural Programming, Internal Reinforcement. We introduce an Internal Reinforcement procedure and demon strate its use through an illustrative experiment. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #459206 has the title `Where Does the Good Stuff Go, and Why? How contextual semantics influences program structure in
` and the abstract `Using deliberately designed primitive sets, we investigate the relationship between context-based expression mechanisms and the size, height and density of genetic program trees during the evolutionary process. We show that contextual semantics influence the composition, location and flows of operative code in a program. In detail we analyze these dynamics and discuss the impact of our findings on micro-level descriptions of genetic programming.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #459206 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #459206 has the title `Where Does the Good Stuff Go, and Why? How contextual semantics influences program structure in
` and the abstract `Using deliberately designed primitive sets, we investigate the relationship between context-based expression mechanisms and the size, height and density of genetic program trees during the evolutionary process. We show that contextual semantics influence the composition, location and flows of operative code in a program. In detail we analyze these dynamics and discuss the impact of our findings on micro-level descriptions of genetic programming.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #459206 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Genetic_Algorithms