Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #195792. 	[Title] A Comparison between Cellular Encoding and Direct Encoding for Genetic Neural Networks [Abstract] This paper compares the efficiency of two encoding schemes for Artificial Neural Networks optimized by evolutionary algorithms. Direct Encoding encodes the weights for an a priori fixed neural network architecture. Cellular Encoding encodes both weights and the architecture of the neural network. In previous studies, Direct Encoding and Cellular Encoding have been used to create neural networks for balancing 1 and 2 poles attached to a cart on a fixed track. The poles are balanced by a controller that pushes the cart to the left or the right. In some cases velocity information about the pole and cart is provided as an input; in other cases the network must learn to balance a single pole without velocity information. A careful study of the behavior of these systems suggests that it is possible to balance a single pole with velocity information as an input and without learning to compute the velocity. A new fitness function is introduced that forces the neural network to compute the velocity. By using this new fitness function and tuning the syntactic constraints used with cellular encoding, we achieve a tenfold speedup over our previous study and solve a more difficult problem: balancing two poles when no information about the velocity is provided as input. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593155. 	[Title] Cellular Encoding for Interactive Evolutionary Robotics [Abstract] Research in robotics programming is divided in two camps. The direct hand programmming approach uses an explicit model or a behavioral model ( subsumption architecture). The machine learning community uses neural network and/or genetic algorithm. We claim that hand programming and learning are complementary. The two approaches used together can be orders of magnitude more powerful than each approach taken separately. We propose a method to combine them both. It includes three concepts : syntactic constraints to restrict the search space, hand-made problem decomposition, hand given fitness. We use this method to solve a complex problem ( eight-legged locomotion). It needs 5000 less evaluations compared to when genetic algorithm are used alone. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1128974. 	[Title] An Evolutionary Method to Find Good Building-Blocks for Architectures of Artificial Neural Networks [Abstract] This paper deals with the combination of Evolutionary Algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). A new method is presented, to find good building-blocks for architectures of Artificial Neural Networks. The method is based on Cellular Encoding, a representation scheme by F. Gruau, and on Genetic Programming by J. Koza. First it will be shown that a modified Cellular Encoding technique is able to find good architectures even for non-boolean networks. With the help of a graph-database and a new graph-rewriting method, it is secondly possible to build architectures from modular structures. The information about building-blocks for architectures is obtained by statistically analyzing the data in the graph-database. Simulation results for two real world problems are given. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #175256. 	[Title] Adaptive Global Optimization with Local Search [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #45605. 	[Title] Learning and evolution in neural networks [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1131565. 	[Title] GENE REGULATION AND BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN NEURAL NETWORKS: AN EXPLORATORY MODEL [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593328. 	[Title] Evolution of a Time-Optimal Fly-To Controller Circuit using Genetic Programming [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593329. 	[Title] Use of Architecture-Altering Operations to Dynamically Adapt a Three-Way Analog Source Identification Circuit to Accommodate [Abstract] We used genetic programming to evolve b o t h the topology and the sizing (numerical values) for each component of an analog electrical circuit that can correctly classify an incoming analog electrical signal into three categories. Then, the r e p e r t o i r e o f s o u r c e s w a s dynamically changed by adding a new source during the run. The p a p e r d e s c r i b e s h o w t h e Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593209. 	[Title] Some Steps Towards a Form of Parallel Distributed Genetic Programming [Abstract] Genetic Programming is a method of program discovery consisting of a special kind of genetic algorithm capable of operating on nonlinear chromosomes (parse trees) representing programs and an interpreter which can run the programs being optimised. This paper describes PDGP (Parallel Distributed Genetic Programming), a new form of genetic programming which is suitable for the development of fine-grained parallel programs. PDGP is based on a graph-like representation for parallel programs which is manipulated by crossover and mutation operators which guarantee the syntactic correctness of the offspring. The paper describes these operators and reports some preliminary results obtained with this paradigm. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593210. 	[Title] Discovery of Symbolic, Neuro-Symbolic and Neural Networks with Parallel Distributed Genetic Programming [Abstract] Technical Report: CSRP-96-14 August 1996 Abstract Genetic Programming is a method of program discovery consisting of a special kind of genetic algorithm capable of operating on parse trees representing programs and an interpreter which can run the programs being optimised. This paper describes Parallel Distributed Genetic Programming (PDGP), a new form of genetic programming which is suitable for the development of parallel programs in which symbolic and neural processing elements can be combined a in free and natural way. PDGP is based on a graph-like representation for parallel programs which is manipulated by crossover and mutation operators which guarantee the syntactic correctness of the offspring. The paper describes these operators and reports some results obtained with the exclusive-or problem. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #682815. 	[Title] The Role of Development in Genetic Algorithms [Abstract] Technical Report Number CS94-394 Computer Science and Engineering, U.C.S.D. Abstract The developmental mechanisms transforming genotypic to phenotypic forms are typically omitted in formulations of genetic algorithms (GAs) in which these two representational spaces are identical. We argue that a careful analysis of developmental mechanisms is useful when understanding the success of several standard GA techniques, and can clarify the relationships between more recently proposed enhancements. We provide a framework which distinguishes between two developmental mechanisms | learning and maturation | while also showing several common effects on GA search. This framework is used to analyze how maturation and local search can change the dynamics of the GA. We observe that in some contexts, maturation and local search can be incorporated into the fitness evaluation, but illustrate reasons for considering them seperately. Further, we identify contexts in which maturation and local search can be distinguished from the fitness evaluation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #87363. 	[Title] Computation. Automated Synthesis of Analog Electrical Circuits by Means of Genetic Programming [Abstract] The design (synthesis) of analog electrical circuits starts with a high-level statement of the circuit's desired behavior and requires creating a circuit that satisfies the specified design goals. Analog circuit synthesis entails the creation of both the topology and the sizing (numerical values) of all of the circuit's components. The difficulty of the problem of analog circuit synthesis is well known and there is no previously known general automated technique for synthesizing an analog circuit from a high-level statement of the circuit's desired behavior. This paper presents a single uniform approach using genetic programming for the automatic synthesis of both the topology and sizing of a suite of eight different prototypical analog circuits, including a lowpass filter, a crossover (woofer and tweeter) filter, a source identification circuit, an amplifier, a computational circuit, a time-optimal controller circuit, a temperaturesensing circuit, and a voltage reference circuit. The problemspecific information required for each of the eight problems is minimal and consists primarily of the number of inputs and outputs of the desired circuit, the types of available components, and a fitness measure that restates the high-level statement of the circuit's desired behavior as a measurable mathematical quantity. The eight genetically evolved circuits constitute an instance of an evolutionary computation technique producing results on a task that is usually thought of as requiring human intelligence. The fact that a single uniform approach yielded a satisfactory design for each of the eight circuits as well as the fact that a satisfactory design was created on the first or second run of each problem are evidence for the general applicability of genetic programming for solving the problem of automatic synthesis of analog electrical circuits. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #459216. 	[Title] Neural Programming and an Internal Reinforcement Policy [Abstract] An important reason for the continued popularity of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in the machine learning community is that the gradient-descent backpropagation procedure gives ANNs a locally optimal change procedure and, in addition, a framework for understanding the ANN learning performance. Genetic programming (GP) is also a successful evolutionary learning technique that provides powerful parameterized primitive constructs. Unlike ANNs, though, GP does not have such a principled procedure for changing parts of the learned system based on its current performance. This paper introduces Neural Programming, a connectionist representation for evolving programs that maintains the benefits of GP. The connectionist model of Neural Programming allows for a regression credit-blame procedure in an evolutionary learning system. We describe a general method for an informed feedback mechanism for Neural Programming, Internal Reinforcement. We introduce an Internal Reinforcement procedure and demon strate its use through an illustrative experiment. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #650834. 	[Title] Neural Networks in an Artificial Life Perspective [Abstract] In the last few years several researchers within the Artificial Life and Mobile Robotics community used Artificial Neural Networks. Explicitly viewing Neural Networks in an Artificial Life perspective has a number of consequences that make research on what we will call Artificial Life Neural Networks ( ALNNs) rather different from traditional connectionist research. The aim of the paper is to make the differences between ALNNs and "classical" neural networks explicit. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35797. 	[Title] Proben1 A Set of Neural Network Benchmark Problems and Benchmarking Rules [Abstract] Proben1 is a collection of problems for neural network learning in the realm of pattern classification and function approximation plus a set of rules and conventions for carrying out benchmark tests with these or similar problems. Proben1 contains 15 data sets from 12 different domains. All datasets represent realistic problems which could be called diagnosis tasks and all but one consist of real world data. The datasets are all presented in the same simple format, using an attribute representation that can directly be used for neural network training. Along with the datasets, Proben1 defines a set of rules for how to conduct and how to document neural network benchmarking. The purpose of the problem and rule collection is to give researchers easy access to data for the evaluation of their algorithms and networks and to make direct comparison of the published results feasible. This report describes the datasets and the benchmarking rules. It also gives some basic performance measures indicating the difficulty of the various problems. These measures can be used as baselines for comparison. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1102550. 	[Title] Culling Teaching -1 Culling and Teaching in Neuro-evolution [Abstract] The evolving population of neural nets contains information not only in terms of genes, but also in the collection of behaviors of the population members. Such information can be thought of as a kind of culture of the population. Two ways of exploiting that culture are explored in this paper: (1) Culling overlarge litters: Generate a large number of offspring with different crossovers, quickly evaluate them by comparing their performance to the population, and throw away those that appear poor. (2) Teaching: Use backpropagation to train offspring toward the performance of the population. Both techniques result in faster, more effective neuro-evolution, and they can be effectively combined, as is demonstrated on the inverted pendulum problem. Additional methods of cultural exploitation are possible and will be studied in future work. These results suggest that cultural exploitation is a powerful idea that allows leveraging several aspects of the genetic algorithm. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #377303. 	[Title] Evolving Deterministic Finite Automata Using Cellular Encoding programming and cellular encoding. Programs are evolved that [Abstract] This paper presents a method for the initial singlestate zygote. The results evolution of deterministic finite Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593240. 	[Title] Evolution of Pseudo-colouring Algorithms for Image Enhancement with Interactive Genetic Programming [Abstract] Technical Report: CSRP-97-5 School of Computer Science The University of Birmingham Abstract In this paper we present an approach to the interactive development of programs for image enhancement with Genetic Programming (GP) based on pseudo-colour transformations. In our approach the user drives GP by deciding which individual should be the winner in tournament selection. The presence of the user does not only allow running GP without a fitness function but it also transforms GP into a very efficient search procedure capable of producing effective solutions to real-life problems in only hundreds of evaluations. In the paper we also propose a strategy to further reduce user interaction: we record the choices made by the user in interactive runs and we later use them to build a model which can replace him/her in longer runs. Experimental results with interactive GP and with our user-modelling strategy are also reported. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #427606. 	[Title] Biological metaphors and the design of modular artificial neural networks Master's thesis of [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1129572. 	[Title] Non-Deterministic, Constraint-Based Parsing of Human Genes [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #19045. 	[Title] AUTOMATED TOPOLOGY AND SIZING OF ANALOG CIRCUITS AUTOMATED DESIGN OF BOTH THE TOPOLOGY AND SIZING [Abstract] This paper describes an automated process for designing analog electrical circuits based on the principles of natural selection, sexual recombination, and developmental biology. The design process starts with the random creation of a large population of program trees composed of circuit-constructing functions. Each program tree specifies the steps by which a fully developed circuit is to be progressively developed from a common embryonic circuit appropriate for the type of circuit that the user wishes to design. Each fully developed circuit is translated into a netlist, simulated using a modified version of SPICE, and evaluated as to how well it satisfies the user's design requirements. The fitness measure is a user-written computer program that may incorporate any calculable characteristic or combination of characteristics of the circuit, including the circuit's behavior in the time domain, its behavior in the frequency domain, its power consumption, the number of components, cost of components, or surface area occupied by its components. The population of program trees is genetically bred over a series of many generations using genetic programming. Genetic programming is driven by a fitness measure and employs genetic operations such as Darwinian reproduction, sexual recombination (crossover), and occasional mutation to create offspring. This automated evolutionary process produces both the topology of the circuit and the numerical values for each component. This paper describes how genetic programming can evolve the circuit for a difficult-to-design low-pass filter. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #85352. 	[Title] Evolution in Time and Space The Parallel Genetic Algorithm [Abstract] The parallel genetic algorithm (PGA) uses two major modifications compared to the genetic algorithm. Firstly, selection for mating is distributed. Individuals live in a 2-D world. Selection of a mate is done by each individual independently in its neighborhood. Secondly, each individual may improve its fitness during its lifetime by e.g. local hill-climbing. The PGA is totally asynchronous, running with maximal efficiency on MIMD parallel computers. The search strategy of the PGA is based on a small number of active and intelligent individuals, whereas a GA uses a large population of passive individuals. We will investigate the PGA with deceptive problems and the traveling salesman problem. We outline why and when the PGA is succesful. Abstractly, a PGA is a parallel search with information exchange between the individuals. If we represent the optimization problem as a fitness landscape in a certain configuration space, we see, that a PGA tries to jump from two local minima to a third, still better local minima, by using the crossover operator. This jump is (probabilistically) successful, if the fitness landscape has a certain correlation. We show the correlation for the traveling salesman problem by a configuration space analysis. The PGA explores implicitly the above correlation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #251756. 	[Title] Cellular Encoding Applied to Neurocontrol [Abstract] Neural networks are trained for balancing 1 and 2 poles attached to a cart on a fixed track. For one variant of the single pole system, only pole angle and cart position variables are supplied as inputs; the network must learn to compute velocities. All of the problems are solved using a fixed architecture and using a new version of cellular encoding that evolves an application specific architecture with real-valued weights. The learning times and generalization capabilities are compared for neural networks developed using both methods. After a post processing simplification, topologies produced by cellular encoding were very simple and could be analyzed. Architectures with no hidden units were produced for the single pole and the two pole problem when velocity information is supplied as an input. Moreover, these linear solutions display good generalization. For all the control problems, cellular encoding can automatically generate architectures whose complexity and structure reflect the features of the problem to solve. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35061. 	[Title] Evolving Networks: Using the Genetic Algorithm with Connectionist Learning [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #887. 	[Title] Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal, 3(3):211-229, 1959. Some [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #62329. 	[Title] Automatic Definition of Modular Neural Networks [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #195792 has the title `A Comparison between Cellular Encoding and Direct Encoding for Genetic Neural Networks  
` and the abstract `This paper compares the efficiency of two encoding schemes for Artificial Neural Networks optimized by evolutionary algorithms. Direct Encoding encodes the weights for an a priori fixed neural network architecture. Cellular Encoding encodes both weights and the architecture of the neural network. In previous studies, Direct Encoding and Cellular Encoding have been used to create neural networks for balancing 1 and 2 poles attached to a cart on a fixed track. The poles are balanced by a controller that pushes the cart to the left or the right. In some cases velocity information about the pole and cart is provided as an input; in other cases the network must learn to balance a single pole without velocity information. A careful study of the behavior of these systems suggests that it is possible to balance a single pole with velocity information as an input and without learning to compute the velocity. A new fitness function is introduced that forces the neural network to compute the velocity. By using this new fitness function and tuning the syntactic constraints used with cellular encoding, we achieve a tenfold speedup over our previous study and solve a more difficult problem: balancing two poles when no information about the velocity is provided as input.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #195792 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #195792 has the title `A Comparison between Cellular Encoding and Direct Encoding for Genetic Neural Networks  
` and the abstract `This paper compares the efficiency of two encoding schemes for Artificial Neural Networks optimized by evolutionary algorithms. Direct Encoding encodes the weights for an a priori fixed neural network architecture. Cellular Encoding encodes both weights and the architecture of the neural network. In previous studies, Direct Encoding and Cellular Encoding have been used to create neural networks for balancing 1 and 2 poles attached to a cart on a fixed track. The poles are balanced by a controller that pushes the cart to the left or the right. In some cases velocity information about the pole and cart is provided as an input; in other cases the network must learn to balance a single pole without velocity information. A careful study of the behavior of these systems suggests that it is possible to balance a single pole with velocity information as an input and without learning to compute the velocity. A new fitness function is introduced that forces the neural network to compute the velocity. By using this new fitness function and tuning the syntactic constraints used with cellular encoding, we achieve a tenfold speedup over our previous study and solve a more difficult problem: balancing two poles when no information about the velocity is provided as input.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #195792 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Genetic_Algorithms