Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #11337. 	[Title] An Empirical Analysis of the Benefit of Decision Tree Size Biases as a Function of [Abstract] The results reported here empirically show the benefit of decision tree size biases as a function of concept distribution. First, it is shown how concept distribution complexity (the number of internal nodes in the smallest decision tree consistent with the example space) affects the benefit of minimum size and maximum size decision tree biases. Second, a policy is described that defines what a learner should do given knowledge of the complexity of the distribution of concepts. Third, explanations for why the distribution of concepts seen in practice is amenable to the minimum size decision tree bias are given and evaluated empirically. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1128256. 	[Title] Where Do SE-trees Perform? (Part I) [Abstract] As a classifier, a Set Enumeration (SE) tree can be viewed as a generalization of decision trees. We empirically characterize domains in which SE-trees are particularly advantageous relative to decision trees. Specifically, we show that: Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1272. 	[Title] Learning a set of primitive actions with an Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1):81-106, [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #11337 has the title `An Empirical Analysis of the Benefit of Decision Tree Size Biases as a Function of
` and the abstract `The results reported here empirically show the benefit of decision tree size biases as a function of concept distribution. First, it is shown how concept distribution complexity (the number of internal nodes in the smallest decision tree consistent with the example space) affects the benefit of minimum size and maximum size decision tree biases. Second, a policy is described that defines what a learner should do given knowledge of the complexity of the distribution of concepts. Third, explanations for why the distribution of concepts seen in practice is amenable to the minimum size decision tree bias are given and evaluated empirically. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #11337 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #11337 has the title `An Empirical Analysis of the Benefit of Decision Tree Size Biases as a Function of
` and the abstract `The results reported here empirically show the benefit of decision tree size biases as a function of concept distribution. First, it is shown how concept distribution complexity (the number of internal nodes in the smallest decision tree consistent with the example space) affects the benefit of minimum size and maximum size decision tree biases. Second, a policy is described that defines what a learner should do given knowledge of the complexity of the distribution of concepts. Third, explanations for why the distribution of concepts seen in practice is amenable to the minimum size decision tree bias are given and evaluated empirically. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #11337 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Theory