Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #129042. 	[Title] Towards Improving Case Adaptability with a Genetic Algorithm [Abstract] Case combination is a difficult problem in Case Based Reasoning, as sub-cases often exhibit conflicts when merged together. In our previous work we formalized case combination by representing each case as a constraint satisfaction problem, and used the minimum conflicts algorithm to systematically synthesize the global solution. However, we also found instances of the problem in which the minimum conflicts algorithm does not perform case combination efficiently. In this paper we describe those situations in which initially retrieved cases are not easily adaptable, and propose a method by which to improve case adaptability with a genetic algorithm. We introduce a fitness function that maintains as much retrieved case information as possible, while also perturbing a sub-solution to allow subsequent case combination to proceed more efficiently. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1952. 	[Title] Combining Rules and Cases to Learn Case Adaptation [Abstract] Computer models of case-based reasoning (CBR) generally guide case adaptation using a fixed set of adaptation rules. A difficult practical problem is how to identify the knowledge required to guide adaptation for particular tasks. Likewise, an open issue for CBR as a cognitive model is how case adaptation knowledge is learned. We describe a new approach to acquiring case adaptation knowledge. In this approach, adaptation problems are initially solved by reasoning from scratch, using abstract rules about structural transformations and general memory search heuristics. Traces of the processing used for successful rule-based adaptation are stored as cases to enable future adaptation to be done by case-based reasoning. When similar adaptation problems are encountered in the future, these adaptation cases provide task- and domain-specific guidance for the case adaptation process. We present the tenets of the approach concerning the relationship between memory search and case adaptation, the memory search process, and the storage and reuse of cases representing adaptation episodes. These points are discussed in the context of ongoing research on DIAL, a computer model that learns case adaptation knowledge for case-based disaster response planning. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1121313. 	[Title] A CBR Integration From Inception to Productization [Abstract] Our case-based reasoning (CBR) integration with the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) formalism has undergone several transformations on its journey from initial research idea to product-intent design. Both unexpected research results as well as interesting insights into the real-world applicability of the integrated methodology emerged as the integration was explored from alternative viewpoints. In this paper, the alternative viewpoints and the results that were enabled by these viewpoints are described. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1953. 	[Title] Representing Self-knowledge for Introspection about Memory Search [Abstract] This position paper sketches a framework for modeling introspective reasoning and discusses the relevance of that framework for modeling introspective reasoning about memory search. It argues that effective and flexible memory processing in rich memories should be built on five types of explicitly represented self-knowledge: knowledge about information needs, relationships between different types of information, expectations for the actual behavior of the information search process, desires for its ideal behavior, and representations of how those expectations and desires relate to its actual performance. This approach to modeling memory search is both an illustration of general principles for modeling introspective reasoning and a step towards addressing the problem of how a reasoner human or machinecan acquire knowledge about the properties of its own knowledge base. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #3112. 	[Title] Supporting Combined Human and Machine Planning: An Interface for Planning by Analogical Reasoning [Abstract] Realistic and complex planning situations require a mixed-initiative planning framework in which human and automated planners interact to mutually construct a desired plan. Ideally, this joint cooperation has the potential of achieving better plans than either the human or the machine can create alone. Human planners often take a case-based approach to planning, relying on their past experience and planning by retrieving and adapting past planning cases. Planning by analogical reasoning in which generative and case-based planning are combined, as in Prodigy/Analogy, provides a suitable framework to study this mixed-initiative integration. However, having a human user engaged in this planning loop creates a variety of new research questions. The challenges we found creating a mixed-initiative planning system fall into three categories: planning paradigms differ in human and machine planning; visualization of the plan and planning process is a complex, but necessary task; and human users range across a spectrum of experience, both with respect to the planning domain and the underlying planning technology. This paper presents our approach to these three problems when designing an interface to incorporate a human into the process of planning by analogical reasoning with Prodigy/Analogy. The interface allows the user to follow both generative and case-based planning, it supports visualization of both plan and the planning rationale, and it addresses the variance in the experience of the user by allowing the user to control the presentation of information. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1108363. 	[Title] Synergy and Commonality in Case-Based and Constraint-Based Reasoning [Abstract] Although Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) is a natural formulation for many problems, our previous work on CBR as applied to design made it apparent that there were elements of the CBR paradigm that prevented it from being more widely applied. At the same time, we were evaluating Constraint Satisfaction techniques for design, and found a commonality in motivation between repair-based constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) and case adaptation. This led us to combine the two methodologies in order to gain the advantages of CSP for case-based reasoning, allowing CBR to be more widely and flexibly applied. In combining the two methodologies, we found some unexpected synergy and commonality between the approaches. This paper describes the synergy and commonality that emerged as we combined case-based and constraint-based reasoning, and gives a brief overview of our continuing and future work on exploiting the emergent synergy when combining these reasoning modes. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1949. 	[Title] Learning to Improve Case Adaptation by Introspective Reasoning and CBR [Abstract] In current CBR systems, case adaptation is usually performed by rule-based methods that use task-specific rules hand-coded by the system developer. The ability to define those rules depends on knowledge of the task and domain that may not be available a priori, presenting a serious impediment to endowing CBR systems with the needed adaptation knowledge. This paper describes ongoing research on a method to address this problem by acquiring adaptation knowledge from experience. The method uses reasoning from scratch, based on introspective reasoning about the requirements for successful adaptation, to build up a library of adaptation cases that are stored for future reuse. We describe the tenets of the approach and the types of knowledge it requires. We sketch initial computer implementation, lessons learned, and open questions for further study. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #129045. 	[Title] Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction using Case-Based Reasoning Techniques [Abstract] The Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problem (DCSP) formalism has been gaining attention as a valuable and often necessary extension of the static CSP framework. Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction enables CSP techniques to be applied more extensively, since it can be applied in domains where the set of constraints and variables involved in the problem evolves with time. At the same time, the Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) community has been working on techniques by which to reuse existing solutions when solving new problems. We have observed that dynamic constraint satisfaction matches very closely the case-based reasoning process of case adaptation. These observations emerged from our previous work on combining CBR and CSP to achieve a constraint-based adaptation. This paper summarizes our previous results, describes the similarity of the challenges facing both DCSP and case adaptation, and shows how CSP and CBR can together begin to address these chal lenges. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #3097. 	[Title] Towards A Computer Model of Memory Search Strategy Learning [Abstract] Much recent research on modeling memory processes has focused on identifying useful indices and retrieval strategies to support particular memory tasks. Another important question concerning memory processes, however, is how retrieval criteria are learned. This paper examines the issues involved in modeling the learning of memory search strategies. It discusses the general requirements for appropriate strategy learning and presents a model of memory search strategy learning applied to the problem of retrieving relevant information for adapting cases in case-based reasoning. It discusses an implementation of that model, and, based on the lessons learned from that implementation, points towards issues and directions in refining the model. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #3101. 	[Title] Acquiring Case Adaptation Knowledge: A Hybrid Approach [Abstract] The ability of case-based reasoning (CBR) systems to apply cases to novel situations depends on their case adaptation knowledge. However, endowing CBR systems with adequate adaptation knowledge has proven to be a very difficult task. This paper describes a hybrid method for performing case adaptation, using a combination of rule-based and case-based reasoning. It shows how this approach provides a framework for acquiring flexible adaptation knowledge from experiences with autonomous adaptation and suggests its potential as a basis for acquisition of adaptation knowledge from interactive user guidance. It also presents initial experimental results examining the benefits of the approach and comparing the relative contributions of case learning and adaptation learning to reasoning performance. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #129042 has the title `Towards Improving Case Adaptability with a Genetic Algorithm  
` and the abstract `Case combination is a difficult problem in Case Based Reasoning, as sub-cases often exhibit conflicts when merged together. In our previous work we formalized case combination by representing each case as a constraint satisfaction problem, and used the minimum conflicts algorithm to systematically synthesize the global solution. However, we also found instances of the problem in which the minimum conflicts algorithm does not perform case combination efficiently. In this paper we describe those situations in which initially retrieved cases are not easily adaptable, and propose a method by which to improve case adaptability with a genetic algorithm. We introduce a fitness function that maintains as much retrieved case information as possible, while also perturbing a sub-solution to allow subsequent case combination to proceed more efficiently.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #129042 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #129042 has the title `Towards Improving Case Adaptability with a Genetic Algorithm  
` and the abstract `Case combination is a difficult problem in Case Based Reasoning, as sub-cases often exhibit conflicts when merged together. In our previous work we formalized case combination by representing each case as a constraint satisfaction problem, and used the minimum conflicts algorithm to systematically synthesize the global solution. However, we also found instances of the problem in which the minimum conflicts algorithm does not perform case combination efficiently. In this paper we describe those situations in which initially retrieved cases are not easily adaptable, and propose a method by which to improve case adaptability with a genetic algorithm. We introduce a fitness function that maintains as much retrieved case information as possible, while also perturbing a sub-solution to allow subsequent case combination to proceed more efficiently.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #129042 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Case_Based