Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #48555. 	[Title] FEEDBACK STABILIZATION USING TWO-HIDDEN-LAYER NETS [Abstract] This paper compares the representational capabilities of one hidden layer and two hidden layer nets consisting of feedforward interconnections of linear threshold units. It is remarked that for certain problems two hidden layers are required, contrary to what might be in principle expected from the known approximation theorems. The differences are not based on numerical accuracy or number of units needed, nor on capabilities for feature extraction, but rather on a much more basic classification into "direct" and "inverse" problems. The former correspond to the approximation of continuous functions, while the latter are concerned with approximating one-sided inverses of continuous functions |and are often encountered in the context of inverse kinematics determination or in control questions. A general result is given showing that nonlinear control systems can be stabilized using two hidden layers, but not in general using just one. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #105856. 	[Title] Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension of Recurrent Neural Networks [Abstract] Most of the work on the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension of neural networks has been focused on feedforward networks. However, recurrent networks are also widely used in learning applications, in particular when time is a relevant parameter. This paper provides lower and upper bounds for the VC dimension of such networks. Several types of activation functions are discussed, including threshold, polynomial, piecewise-polynomial and sigmoidal functions. The bounds depend on two independent parameters: the number w of weights in the network, and the length k of the input sequence. In contrast, for feedforward networks, VC dimension bounds can be expressed as a function of w only. An important difference between recurrent and feedforward nets is that a fixed recurrent net can receive inputs of arbitrary length. Therefore we are particularly interested in the case k w. Ignoring multiplicative constants, the main results say roughly the following: * For architectures with activation = any fixed nonlinear polynomial, the VC dimension is wk. * For architectures with activation = any fixed piecewise polynomial, the VC dimension is between wk and w 2 k. * For architectures with activation = H (threshold nets), the VC dimension is between w log(k=w) and minfwk log wk; w 2 + w log wkg. * For the standard sigmoid (x) = 1=(1 + e x ), the VC dimension is between wk and w 4 k 2 . An earlier version of this paper has appeared in Proc. 3rd European Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, LNCS 1208, pages 223-237, Springer, 1997. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #48550. 	[Title] Identification and Control of Nonlinear Systems Using Neural Network Models: Design and Stability Analysis [Abstract] Report 91-09-01 September 1991 (revised) May 1994 Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #18536. 	[Title] "UNIVERSAL" CONSTRUCTION OF ARTSTEIN'S THEOREM ON NONLINEAR STABILIZATION 1 [Abstract] Report SYCON-89-03 ABSTRACT This note presents an explicit proof of the theorem -due to Artstein- which states that the existence of a smooth control-Lyapunov function implies smooth stabilizability. More- over, the result is extended to the real-analytic and rational cases as well. The proof uses a "universal" formula given by an algebraic function of Lie derivatives; this formula originates in the solution of a simple Riccati equation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #5194. 	[Title] NETWORKS, FUNCTION DETERMINES FORM [Abstract] Report SYCON-92-03 ABSTRACT This paper shows that the weights of continuous-time feedback neural networks are uniquely identifiable from input/output measurements. Under very weak genericity assumptions, the following is true: Assume given two nets, whose neurons all have the same nonlinear activation function ; if the two nets have equal behaviors as "black boxes" then necessarily they must have the same number of neurons and |except at most for sign reversals at each node| the same weights. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #910. 	[Title] Learning networks for face analysis and synthesis [Abstract] This paper presents an overview of the face-related projects in our group. The unifying theme underlying our work is the use of example-based learning methods for both analyzing and synthesizing face images. We label the example face images (and for the problem of face detection, "near miss" faces as well) with descriptive parameters for pose, expression, identity, and face vs. non-face. Then, by using example-based learning techniques, we develop networks for performing analysis tasks such as pose and expression estimation, face recognition, and face detection in cluttered scenes. In addition to these analysis applications, we show how the example-based technique can also be used as a novel method for image synthesis that is for computer graphics. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1120049. 	[Title] Dimension of Recurrent Neural Networks [Abstract] DIMACS Technical Report 96-56 December 1996 Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #179702. 	[Title] FURTHER FACTS ABOUT INPUT TO STATE STABILIZATION "Further facts about input to state stabilization", IEEE [Abstract] Report SYCON-88-15 ABSTRACT Previous results about input to state stabilizability are shown to hold even for systems which are not linear in controls, provided that a more general type of feedback be allowed. Applications to certain stabilization problems and coprime factorizations, as well as comparisons to other results on input to state stability, are also briefly discussed. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #227286. 	[Title] Space-Frequency Localized Basis Function Networks for Nonlinear System Estimation and Control [Abstract] Stable neural network control and estimation may be viewed formally as a merging of concepts from nonlinear dynamic systems theory with tools from multivariate approximation theory. This paper extends earlier results on adaptive control and estimation of nonlinear systems using gaussian radial basis functions to the on-line generation of irregularly sampled networks, using tools from multiresolution analysis and wavelet theory. This yields much more compact and efficient system representations while preserving global closed-loop stability. Approximation models employing basis functions that are localized in both space and spatial frequency admit a measure of the approximated function's spatial frequency content that is not directly dependent on reconstruction error. As a result, these models afford a means of adaptively selecting basis functions according to the local spatial frequency content of the approximated function. An algorithm for stable, on-line adaptation of output weights simultaneously with node configuration in a class of non-parametric models with wavelet basis functions is presented. An asymptotic bound on the error in the network's reconstruction is derived and shown to be dependent solely on the minimum approximation error associated with the steady state node configuration. In addition, prior bounds on the temporal bandwidth of the system to be identified or controlled are used to develop a criterion for on-line selection of radial and ridge wavelet basis functions, thus reducing the rate of increase in network's size with the dimension of the state vector. Experimental results obtained by using the network to predict the path of an unknown light bluff object thrown through air, in an active-vision based robotic catching system, are given to illustrate the network's performance in a simple real-time application. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #289945. 	[Title] Some Topics in Neural Networks and Control [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #133563. 	[Title] NEURAL NETS AS SYSTEMS MODELS AND CONTROLLERS suitability of "neural nets" as models for dynamical [Abstract] This paper briefly surveys some recent results relevant Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #424540. 	[Title] FEEDBACK STABILIZATION OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS [Abstract] This paper surveys some well-known facts as well as some recent developments on the topic of stabilization of nonlinear systems. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #3229. 	[Title] Book Review  Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation Reviewed by: 2 [Abstract] Neural computation, also called connectionism, parallel distributed processing, neural network modeling or brain-style computation, has grown rapidly in the last decade. Despite this explosion, and ultimately because of impressive applications, there has been a dire need for a concise introduction from a theoretical perspective, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of connectionist approaches and establishing links to other disciplines, such as statistics or control theory. The Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation by Hertz, Krogh and Palmer (subsequently referred to as HKP) is written from the perspective of physics, the home discipline of the authors. The book fulfills its mission as an introduction for neural network novices, provided that they have some background in calculus, linear algebra, and statistics. It covers a number of models that are often viewed as disjoint. Critical analyses and fruitful comparisons between these models Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #133566. 	[Title] Recurrent Neural Networks: Some Systems-Theoretic Aspects [Abstract] This paper provides an exposition of some recent research regarding system-theoretic aspects of continuous-time recurrent (dynamic) neural networks with sigmoidal activation functions. The class of systems is introduced and discussed, and a result is cited regarding their universal approximation properties. Known characterizations of controllability, ob-servability, and parameter identifiability are reviewed, as well as a result on minimality. Facts regarding the computational power of recurrent nets are also mentioned. fl Supported in part by US Air Force Grant AFOSR-94-0293 Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #48555 has the title `FEEDBACK STABILIZATION USING TWO-HIDDEN-LAYER NETS  
` and the abstract `This paper compares the representational capabilities of one hidden layer and two hidden layer nets consisting of feedforward interconnections of linear threshold units. It is remarked that for certain problems two hidden layers are required, contrary to what might be in principle expected from the known approximation theorems. The differences are not based on numerical accuracy or number of units needed, nor on capabilities for feature extraction, but rather on a much more basic classification into "direct" and "inverse" problems. The former correspond to the approximation of continuous functions, while the latter are concerned with approximating one-sided inverses of continuous functions |and are often encountered in the context of inverse kinematics determination or in control questions. A general result is given showing that nonlinear control systems can be stabilized using two hidden layers, but not in general using just one. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #48555 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #48555 has the title `FEEDBACK STABILIZATION USING TWO-HIDDEN-LAYER NETS  
` and the abstract `This paper compares the representational capabilities of one hidden layer and two hidden layer nets consisting of feedforward interconnections of linear threshold units. It is remarked that for certain problems two hidden layers are required, contrary to what might be in principle expected from the known approximation theorems. The differences are not based on numerical accuracy or number of units needed, nor on capabilities for feature extraction, but rather on a much more basic classification into "direct" and "inverse" problems. The former correspond to the approximation of continuous functions, while the latter are concerned with approximating one-sided inverses of continuous functions |and are often encountered in the context of inverse kinematics determination or in control questions. A general result is given showing that nonlinear control systems can be stabilized using two hidden layers, but not in general using just one. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #48555 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Neural_Networks