Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #594025. 	[Title] Evolving a Generalised Behaviour: Artificial Ant Problem Revisited [Abstract] This research aims to demonstrate that a solution for artificial ant problem [4] is very likely to be non-general and relying on the specific characteristics of the Santa Fe trail. It then presents a consistent method which promotes producing general solutions. Using the concepts of training and testing from machine learning research, the method can be useful in producing general behaviours for simulation environments. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #6216. 	[Title] Generalization in Reinforcement Learning: Successful Examples Using Sparse Coarse Coding [Abstract] On large problems, reinforcement learning systems must use parameterized function approximators such as neural networks in order to generalize between similar situations and actions. In these cases there are no strong theoretical results on the accuracy of convergence, and computational results have been mixed. In particular, Boyan and Moore reported at last year's meeting a series of negative results in attempting to apply dynamic programming together with function approximation to simple control problems with continuous state spaces. In this paper, we present positive results for all the control tasks they attempted, and for one that is significantly larger. The most important differences are that we used sparse-coarse-coded function approximators (CMACs) whereas they used mostly global function approximators, and that we learned online whereas they learned o*ine. Boyan and Moore and others have suggested that the problems they encountered could be solved by using actual outcomes ("rollouts"), as in classical Monte Carlo methods, and as in the TD() algorithm when = 1. However, in our experiments this always resulted in substantially poorer performance. We conclude that reinforcement learning can work robustly in conjunction with function approximators, and that there is little justification at present for avoiding the case of general . Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #227178. 	[Title] Evolving Visual Routines [Abstract] Traditional machine vision assumes that the vision system recovers a a complete, labeled description of the world [ Marr, 1982 ] . Recently, several researchers have criticized this model and proposed an alternative model which considers perception as a distributed collection of task-specific, task-driven visual routines [ Aloimonos, 1993, Ullman, 1987 ] . Some of these researchers have argued that in natural living systems these visual routines are the product of natural selection [ Ramachandran, 1985 ] . So far, researchers have hand-coded task-specific visual routines for actual implementations (e.g. [ Chapman, 1993 ] ). In this paper we propose an alternative approach in which visual routines for simple tasks are evolved using an artificial evolution approach. We present results from a series of runs on actual camera images, in which simple routines were evolved using Genetic Programming techniques [ Koza, 1992 ] . The results obtained are promising: the evolved routines are able to correctly classify up to 93% of the images, which is better than the best algorithm we were able to write by hand. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #96847. 	[Title] Generality versus Size in Genetic Programming [Abstract] Genetic Programming (GP) uses variable size representations as programs. Size becomes an important and interesting emergent property of the structures evolved by GP. The size of programs can be both a controlling and a controlled factor in GP search. Size influences the efficiency of the search process and is related to the generality of solutions. This paper analyzes the size and generality issues in standard GP and GP using subroutines and addresses the question whether such an analysis can help control the search process. We relate the size, generalization and modularity issues for programs evolved to control an agent in a dynamic and non-deterministic environment, as exemplified by the Pac-Man game. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #6163. 	[Title] Generalization in Reinforcement Learning: Safely Approximating the Value Function [Abstract] To appear in: G. Tesauro, D. S. Touretzky and T. K. Leen, eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1995. A straightforward approach to the curse of dimensionality in reinforcement learning and dynamic programming is to replace the lookup table with a generalizing function approximator such as a neural net. Although this has been successful in the domain of backgammon, there is no guarantee of convergence. In this paper, we show that the combination of dynamic programming and function approximation is not robust, and in even very benign cases, may produce an entirely wrong policy. We then introduce Grow-Support, a new algorithm which is safe from divergence yet can still reap the benefits of successful generalization. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #96851. 	[Title] Balancing Accuracy and Parsimony in Genetic Programming 1 [Abstract] Genetic programming is distinguished from other evolutionary algorithms in that it uses tree representations of variable size instead of linear strings of fixed length. The flexible representation scheme is very important because it allows the underlying structure of the data to be discovered automatically. One primary difficulty, however, is that the solutions may grow too big without any improvement of their generalization ability. In this paper we investigate the fundamental relationship between the performance and complexity of the evolved structures. The essence of the parsimony problem is demonstrated empirically by analyzing error landscapes of programs evolved for neural network synthesis. We consider genetic programming as a statistical inference problem and apply the Bayesian model-comparison framework to introduce a class of fitness functions with error and complexity terms. An adaptive learning method is then presented that automatically balances the model-complexity factor to evolve parsimonious programs without losing the diversity of the population needed for achieving the desired training accuracy. The effectiveness of this approach is empirically shown on the induction of sigma-pi neural networks for solving a real-world medical diagnosis problem as well as benchmark tasks. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #594025 has the title `Evolving a Generalised Behaviour: Artificial Ant Problem Revisited  
` and the abstract `This research aims to demonstrate that a solution for artificial ant problem [4] is very likely to be non-general and relying on the specific characteristics of the Santa Fe trail. It then presents a consistent method which promotes producing general solutions. Using the concepts of training and testing from machine learning research, the method can be useful in producing general behaviours for simulation environments.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #594025 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #594025 has the title `Evolving a Generalised Behaviour: Artificial Ant Problem Revisited  
` and the abstract `This research aims to demonstrate that a solution for artificial ant problem [4] is very likely to be non-general and relying on the specific characteristics of the Santa Fe trail. It then presents a consistent method which promotes producing general solutions. Using the concepts of training and testing from machine learning research, the method can be useful in producing general behaviours for simulation environments.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #594025 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Genetic_Algorithms