Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #264347. 	[Title] Relative Loss Bounds for Multidimensional Regression Problems [Abstract] We study on-line generalized linear regression with multidimensional outputs, i.e., neural networks with multiple output nodes but no hidden nodes. We allow at the final layer transfer functions such as the softmax function that need to consider the linear activations to all the output neurons. We also use a parameterization function which transforms parameter vectors maintained by the algorithm into the actual weights. The on-line algorithm we consider updates the parameters in an additive manner, analogous to the delta rule, but because the actual weights are obtained via the possibly nonlinear parameterization function they may behave in a very different manner. Our approach is based on applying the notion of a matching loss function in two different contexts. First, we measure the loss of the algorithm in terms of the loss that matches the transfer function used to produce the outputs. Second, the loss function that matches the parameterization function can be used both as a measure of distance between models in motivating the update rule of the algorithm and as a potential function in analyzing its relative performance compared to an arbitrary fixed model. As a result, we have a unified treatment that generalizes earlier results for the gradient descent and exponentiated gradient algorithms to multidimensional outputs, including multiclass logistic regression. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #123556. 	[Title] BACKPROPAGATION SEPARATES WHERE PERCEPTRONS DO [Abstract] Feedforward nets with sigmoidal activation functions are often designed by minimizing a cost criterion. It has been pointed out before that this technique may be outperformed by the classical perceptron learning rule, at least on some problems. In this paper, we show that no such pathologies can arise if the error criterion is of a threshold LMS type, i.e., is zero for values "beyond" the desired target values. More precisely, we show that if the data are linearly separable, and one considers nets with no hidden neurons, then an error function as above cannot have any local minima that are not global. Simulations of networks with hidden units are consistent with these results, in that often data which can be classified when minimizing a threshold LMS criterion may fail to be classified when using instead a simple LMS cost. In addition, the proof gives the following stronger result, under the stated hypotheses: the continuous gradient adjustment procedure is such that from any initial weight configuration a separating set of weights is obtained in finite time. This is a precise analogue of the Perceptron Learning Theorem. The results are then compared with the more classical pattern recognition problem of threshold LMS with linear activations, where no spurious local minima exist even for nonseparable data: here it is shown that even if using the threshold criterion, such bad local minima may occur, if the data are not separable and sigmoids are used. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1111240. 	[Title] On the Distribution of Performance from Multiple Neural Network Trials, On the Distribution of Performance [Abstract] Andrew D. Back was with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Queensland. St. Lucia, Australia. He is now with the Brain Information Processing Group, Frontier Research Program, RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-01, Japan Abstract The performance of neural network simulations is often reported in terms of the mean and standard deviation of a number of simulations performed with different starting conditions. However, in many cases, the distribution of the individual results does not approximate a Gaussian distribution, may not be symmetric, and may be multimodal. We present the distribution of results for practical problems and show that assuming Gaussian distributions can significantly affect the interpretation of results, especially those of comparison studies. For a controlled task which we consider, we find that the distribution of performance is skewed towards better performance for smoother target functions and skewed towards worse performance Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #50354. 	[Title] BACKPROPAGATION CAN GIVE RISE TO SPURIOUS LOCAL MINIMA EVEN FOR NETWORKS WITHOUT HIDDEN LAYERS [Abstract] We give an example of a neural net without hidden layers and with a sigmoid transfer function, together with a training set of binary vectors, for which the sum of the squared errors, regarded as a function of the weights, has a local minimum which is not a global minimum. The example consists of a set of 125 training instances, with four weights and a threshold to be learnt. We do not know if substantially smaller binary examples exist. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #12182. 	[Title] How to Use Expert Advice (Extended Abstract) [Abstract] We analyze algorithms that predict a binary value by combining the predictions of several prediction strategies, called experts. Our analysis is for worst-case situations, i.e., we make no assumptions about the way the sequence of bits to be predicted is generated. We measure the performance of the algorithm by the difference between the expected number of mistakes it makes on the bit sequence and the expected number of mistakes made by the best expert on this sequence, where the expectation is taken with respect to the randomization in the predictions. We show that the minimum achievable difference is on the order of the square root of the number of mistakes of the best expert, and we give efficient algorithms that achieve this. Our upper and lower bounds have matching leading constants in most cases. We give implications of this result on the performance of batch learning algorithms in a PAC setting which improve on the best results currently known in this context. We also extend our analysis to the case in which log loss is used instead of the expected number of mistakes. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #14807. 	[Title] Exponentially many local minima for single neurons [Abstract] We show that for a single neuron with the logistic function as the transfer function the number of local minima of the error function based on the square loss can grow exponentially in the dimension. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1153183. 	[Title]  [Abstract] General convergence results for linear discriminant updates Abstract The problem of learning linear discriminant concepts can be solved by various mistake-driven update procedures, including the Winnow family of algorithms and the well-known Perceptron algorithm. In this paper we define the general class of quasi-additive algorithms, which includes Perceptron and Winnow as special cases. We give a single proof of convergence that covers much of this class, including both Perceptron and Winnow but also many novel algorithms. Our proof introduces a generic measure of progress that seems to capture much of when and how these algorithms converge. Using this measure, we develop a simple general technique for proving mistake bounds, which we apply to the new algorithms as well as existing algorithms. When applied to known algorithms, our technique automatically produces close variants of existing proofs (and we generally obtain the known bounds, to within constants) thus showing, in a certain sense, that these seem ingly diverse results are fundamentally isomorphic. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #264347 has the title `Relative Loss Bounds for Multidimensional Regression Problems  
` and the abstract `We study on-line generalized linear regression with multidimensional outputs, i.e., neural networks with multiple output nodes but no hidden nodes. We allow at the final layer transfer functions such as the softmax function that need to consider the linear activations to all the output neurons. We also use a parameterization function which transforms parameter vectors maintained by the algorithm into the actual weights. The on-line algorithm we consider updates the parameters in an additive manner, analogous to the delta rule, but because the actual weights are obtained via the possibly nonlinear parameterization function they may behave in a very different manner. Our approach is based on applying the notion of a matching loss function in two different contexts. First, we measure the loss of the algorithm in terms of the loss that matches the transfer function used to produce the outputs. Second, the loss function that matches the parameterization function can be used both as a measure of distance between models in motivating the update rule of the algorithm and as a potential function in analyzing its relative performance compared to an arbitrary fixed model. As a result, we have a unified treatment that generalizes earlier results for the gradient descent and exponentiated gradient algorithms to multidimensional outputs, including multiclass logistic regression.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #264347 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #264347 has the title `Relative Loss Bounds for Multidimensional Regression Problems  
` and the abstract `We study on-line generalized linear regression with multidimensional outputs, i.e., neural networks with multiple output nodes but no hidden nodes. We allow at the final layer transfer functions such as the softmax function that need to consider the linear activations to all the output neurons. We also use a parameterization function which transforms parameter vectors maintained by the algorithm into the actual weights. The on-line algorithm we consider updates the parameters in an additive manner, analogous to the delta rule, but because the actual weights are obtained via the possibly nonlinear parameterization function they may behave in a very different manner. Our approach is based on applying the notion of a matching loss function in two different contexts. First, we measure the loss of the algorithm in terms of the loss that matches the transfer function used to produce the outputs. Second, the loss function that matches the parameterization function can be used both as a measure of distance between models in motivating the update rule of the algorithm and as a potential function in analyzing its relative performance compared to an arbitrary fixed model. As a result, we have a unified treatment that generalizes earlier results for the gradient descent and exponentiated gradient algorithms to multidimensional outputs, including multiclass logistic regression.
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #264347 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Theory