Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #568045. 	[Title] An application of ILP in a musical database: learning to compose the two-voice counterpoint [Abstract] We describe SFOIL, a descendant of FOIL that uses the advanced stochastic search heuristic, and its application in learning to compose the two-voice counterpoint. The application required learning a 4-ary relation from more than 20.000 training instances. SFOIL is able to efficiently deal with this learning task which is to our knowledge one of the most complex learning task solved by an ILP system. This demonstrates that ILP systems can scale up to real databases and that top-down ILP systems that use the covering approach and advanced search strategies are appropriate for knowledge discovery in databases and are promising for further investigation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #8224. 	[Title] Mingers, 1989 J. Mingers. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Machine [Abstract] Ourston and Mooney, 1990b ] D. Ourston and R. J. Mooney. Improving shared rules in multiple category domain theories. Technical Report AI90-150, Artificial Intelligence Labora tory, University of Texas, Austin, TX, December 1990. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #178209. 	[Title] SFOIL: Stochastic Approach to Inductive Logic Programming [Abstract] Current systems in the field of Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) use, primarily for the sake of efficiency, heuristically guided search techniques. Such greedy algorithms suffer from local optimization problem. Present paper describes a system named SFOIL, that tries to alleviate this problem by using a stochastic search method, based on a generalization of simulated annealing, called Markovian neural network. Various tests were performed on benchmark, and real-world domains. The results show both, advantages and weaknesses of stochastic approach. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #75972. 	[Title] Overcoming the myopia of inductive learning algorithms with RELIEFF [Abstract] Current inductive machine learning algorithms typically use greedy search with limited looka-head. This prevents them to detect significant conditional dependencies between the attributes that describe training objects. Instead of myopic impurity functions and lookahead, we propose to use RELI-EFF, an extension of RELIEF developed by Kira and Rendell [10], [11], for heuristic guidance of inductive learning algorithms. We have reimplemented Assistant, a system for top down induction of decision trees, using RELIEFF as an estimator of attributes at each selection step. The algorithm is tested on several artificial and several real world problems and the results are compared with some other well known machine learning algorithms. Excellent results on artificial data sets and two real world problems show the advantage of the presented approach to inductive learning. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #591017. 	[Title] Producing More Comprehensible Models While Retaining Their Performance [Abstract] Rissanen's Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle is adapted to handle continuous attributes in the Inductive Logic Programming setting. Application of the developed coding as a MDL pruning mechanism is devised. The behavior of the MDL pruning is tested in a synthetic domain with artificially added noise of different levels and in two real life problems | modelling of the surface roughness of a grinding workpiece and modelling of the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds. Results indicate that MDL pruning is a successful parameter-free noise fighting tool in real-life domains since it acts as a safeguard against building too complex models while retaining the accuracy of the model. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1000012. 	[Title] Stochastic Propositionalization of Non-Determinate Background Knowledge [Abstract] It is a well-known fact that propositional learning algorithms require "good" features to perform well in practice. So a major step in data engineering for inductive learning is the construction of good features by domain experts. These features often represent properties of structured objects, where a property typically is the occurrence of a certain substructure having certain properties. To partly automate the process of "feature engineering", we devised an algorithm that searches for features which are defined by such substructures. The algorithm stochastically conducts a top-down search for first-order clauses, where each clause represents a binary feature. It differs from existing algorithms in that its search is not class-blind, and that it is capable of considering clauses ("context") of almost arbitrary length (size). Preliminary experiments are favorable, and support the view that this approach is promising. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #195150. 	[Title] Naive Bayesian classifier within ILP-R [Abstract] When dealing with the classification problems, current ILP systems often lag behind state-of-the-art attributional learners. Part of the blame can be ascribed to a much larger hypothesis space which, therefore, cannot be as thoroughly explored. However, sometimes it is due to the fact that ILP systems do not take into account the probabilistic aspects of hypotheses when classifying unseen examples. This paper proposes just that. We developed a naive Bayesian classifier within our ILP-R first order learner. The learner itself uses a clever RELIEF based heuristic which is able to detect strong dependencies within the literal space when such dependencies exist. We conducted a series of experiments on artificial and real-world data sets. The results show that the combination of ILP-R together with the naive Bayesian classifier sometimes significantly improves the classification of unseen instances as measured by both classification accuracy and average information score. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #6639. 	[Title] Stochastic search in inductive concept learning [Abstract] Concept learning can be viewed as search of the space of concept descriptions. The hypothesis language determines the search space. In standard inductive learning algorithms, the structure of the search space is determined by generalization/specialization operators. Algorithms perform locally optimal search by using a hill-climbing and/or a beam-search strategy. To overcome this limitation, concept learning can be viewed as stochastic search of the space of concept descriptions. The proposed stochastic search method is based on simulated annealing which is known as a successful means for solving combinatorial optimization problems. The stochastic search method, implemented in a rule learning system ATRIS, is based on a compact and efficient representation of the problem and the appropriate operators for structuring the search space. Furthermore, by heuristic pruning of the search space, the method enables also handling of imperfect data. The paper introduces the stochastic search method, describes the ATRIS learning algorithm and gives results of the experiments. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #116087. 	[Title] Discretization of continuous attributes using ReliefF [Abstract] Many existing learning algorithms expect the attributes to be discrete. Discretization of continuous attributes might be difficult task even for domain experts. We have tried the non-myopic heuristic measure ReliefF for discretization and compared it with well known dissimilarity measure and discretizations by experts. An extensive testing with several learning algorithms on six real world databases has shown that none of the discretizations has clear advantage over the others. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #3218. 	[Title] Rule Induction with CN2: Some Recent Improvements [Abstract] The CN2 algorithm induces an ordered list of classification rules from examples using entropy as its search heuristic. In this short paper, we describe two improvements to this algorithm. Firstly, we present the use of the Laplacian error estimate as an alternative evaluation function and secondly, we show how unordered as well as ordered rules can be generated. We experimentally demonstrate significantly improved performances resulting from these changes, thus enhancing the usefulness of CN2 as an inductive tool. Comparisons with Quinlan's C4.5 are also made. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #116084. 	[Title] Linear Space Induction in First Order Logic with RELIEFF [Abstract] Current ILP algorithms typically use variants and extensions of the greedy search. This prevents them to detect significant relationships between the training objects. Instead of myopic impurity functions, we propose the use of the heuristic based on RELIEF for guidance of ILP algorithms. At each step, in our ILP-R system, this heuristic is used to determine a beam of candidate literals. The beam is then used in an exhaustive search for a potentially good conjunction of literals. From the efficiency point of view we introduce interesting declarative bias which enables us to keep the growth of the training set, when introducing new variables, within linear bounds (linear with respect to the clause length). This bias prohibits cross-referencing of variables in variable dependency tree. The resulting system has been tested on various artificial problems. The advantages and deficiencies of our approach are discussed. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #39127. 	[Title] Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF [Abstract] In the context of machine learning from examples this paper deals with the problem of estimating the quality of attributes with and without dependencies among them. Kira and Rendell (1992a,b) developed an algorithm called RELIEF, which was shown to be very efficient in estimating attributes. Original RELIEF can deal with discrete and continuous attributes and is limited to only two-class problems. In this paper RELIEF is analysed and extended to deal with noisy, incomplete, and multi-class data sets. The extensions are verified on various artificial and one well known real-world problem. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #22431. 	[Title] An investigation of noise-tolerant relational concept learning algorithms [Abstract] We discuss the types of noise that may occur in relational learning systems and describe two approaches to addressing noise in a relational concept learning algorithm. We then evaluate each approach experimentally. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #568045 has the title `An application of ILP in a musical database: learning to compose the two-voice counterpoint  
` and the abstract `We describe SFOIL, a descendant of FOIL that uses the advanced stochastic search heuristic, and its application in learning to compose the two-voice counterpoint. The application required learning a 4-ary relation from more than 20.000 training instances. SFOIL is able to efficiently deal with this learning task which is to our knowledge one of the most complex learning task solved by an ILP system. This demonstrates that ILP systems can scale up to real databases and that top-down ILP systems that use the covering approach and advanced search strategies are appropriate for knowledge discovery in databases and are promising for further investigation. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #568045 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #568045 has the title `An application of ILP in a musical database: learning to compose the two-voice counterpoint  
` and the abstract `We describe SFOIL, a descendant of FOIL that uses the advanced stochastic search heuristic, and its application in learning to compose the two-voice counterpoint. The application required learning a 4-ary relation from more than 20.000 training instances. SFOIL is able to efficiently deal with this learning task which is to our knowledge one of the most complex learning task solved by an ILP system. This demonstrates that ILP systems can scale up to real databases and that top-down ILP systems that use the covering approach and advanced search strategies are appropriate for knowledge discovery in databases and are promising for further investigation. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #568045 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Rule_Learning