Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1128319. 	[Title] Modeling Distributed Search via Social Insects [Abstract] Complex group behavior arises in social insects colonies as the integration of the actions of simple and redundant individual insects [Adler and Gordon, 1992, Oster and Wilson, 1978]. Furthermore, the colony can act as an information center to expedite foraging [Brown, 1989]. We apply these lessons from natural systems to model collective action and memory in a computational agent society. Collective action can expedite search in combinatorial optimization problems [Dorigo et al., 1996]. Collective memory can improve learning in multi-agent systems [Garland and Alterman, 1996]. Our collective adaptation integrates the simplicity of collective action with the pattern detection of collective memory to significantly improve both the gathering and processing of knowledge. As a test of the role of the society as an information center, we examine the ability of the society to distribute task allocation without any omnipotent centralized control. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #108047. 	[Title] Evolving a Team [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1136791. 	[Title] Program Optimization for Faster Genetic Programming [Abstract] We have used genetic programming to develop efficient image processing software. The ultimate goal of our work is to detect certain signs of breast cancer that cannot be detected with current segmentation and classification methods. Traditional techniques do a relatively good job of segmenting and classifying small-scale features of mammo-grams, such as micro-calcification clusters. Our strongly-typed genetic programs work on a multi-resolution representation of the mammogram, and they are aimed at handling features at medium and large scales, such as stel-lated lesions and architectural distortions. The main problem is efficiency. We employ program optimizations that speed up the evolution process by more than a factor of ten. In this paper we present our genetic programming system, and we describe our optimization techniques. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35. 	[Title] 4 Implementing Application Specific Routines  Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Abstract] To implement a specific application, you should only have to change the file app.c. Section 2 describes the routines in app.c in detail. If you use additional variables for your specific problem, the easiest method of making them available to other program units is to declare them in sga.h and external.h. However, take care that you do not redeclare existing variables. Two example applications files are included in the SGA-C distribution. The file app1.c performs the simple example problem included with the Pascal version; finding the maximum of x 10 , where x is an integer interpretation of a chromosome. A slightly more complex application is include in app2.c. This application illustrates two features that have been added to SGA-C. The first of these is the ithruj2int function, which converts bits i through j in a chromosome to an integer. The second new feature is the utility pointer that is associated with each population member. The example application interprets each chromosome as a set of concatenated integers in binary form. The lengths of these integer fields is determined by the user-specified value of field size, which is read in by the function app data(). The field size must be less than the smallest of the chromosome length and the length of an unsigned integer. An integer array for storing the interpreted form of each chromosome is dynamically allocated and assigned to the chromosome's utility pointer in app malloc(). The ithruj2int routine (see utility.c) is used to translate each chromosome into its associated vector. The fitness for each chromosome is simply the sum of the squares of these integers. This example application will function for any chromosome length. SGA-C is intended to be a simple program for first-time GA experimentation. It is not intended to be definitive in terms of its efficiency or the grace of its implementation. The authors are interested in the comments, criticisms, and bug reports from SGA-C users, so that the code can be refined for easier use in subsequent versions. Please email your comments to rob@galab2.mh.ua.edu, or write to TCGA: The authors gratefully acknowledge support provided by NASA under Grant NGT-50224 and support provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant CTS-8451610. We also thank Hillol Kargupta for donating his tournament selection implementation. Booker, L. B. (1982). Intelligent behavior as an adaptation to the task environment (Doctoral dissertation, Technical Report No. 243. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Logic of Computers Group). Dissertations Abstracts International, 43(2), 469B. (University Microfilms No. 8214966) Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #28336. 	[Title] Evolving Behavioral Strategies in Predators and Prey [Abstract] The predator/prey domain is utilized to conduct research in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Genetic Programming is used to evolve behavioral strategies for the predator agents. To further the utility of the predator strategies, the prey population is allowed to evolve at the same time. The expected competitive learning cycle did not surface. This failing is investigated, and a simple prey algorithm surfaces, which is consistently able to evade capture from the predator algorithms. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1153853. 	[Title] Voting for Schemata [Abstract] The schema theorem states that implicit parallel search is behind the power of the genetic algorithm. We contend that chromosomes can vote, proportionate to their fitness, for candidate schemata. We maintain a population of binary strings and ternary schemata. The string population not only works on solving its problem domain, but it supplies fitness for the schema population, which indirectly can solve the original problem. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #38205. 	[Title] Competitive Environments Evolve Better Solutions for Complex Tasks [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #116545. 	[Title] Duplication of Coding Segments in Genetic Programming [Abstract] Research into the utility of non-coding segments, or introns, in genetic-based encodings has shown that they expedite the evolution of solutions in domains by protecting building blocks against destructive crossover. We consider a genetic programming system where non-coding segments can be removed, and the resultant chromosomes returned into the population. This parsimonious repair leads to premature convergence, since as we remove the naturally occurring non-coding segments, we strip away their protective backup feature. We then duplicate the coding segments in the repaired chromosomes, and place the modified chromosomes into the population. The duplication method significantly improves the learning rate in the domain we have considered. We also show that this method can be applied to other domains. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #117315. 	[Title] Evolving Cooperation Strategies [Abstract] The identification, design, and implementation of strategies for cooperation is a central research issue in the field of Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI). We propose a novel approach to the construction of cooperation strategies for a group of problem solvers based on the Genetic Programming (GP) paradigm. GPs are a class of adaptive algorithms used to evolve solution structures that optimize a given evaluation criterion. Our approach is based on designing a representation for cooperation strategies that can be manipulated by GPs. We present results from experiments in the predator-prey domain, which has been extensively studied as a easy-to-describe but difficult-to-solve cooperation problem domain. The key aspect of our approach is the minimal reliance on domain knowledge and human intervention in the construction of good cooperation strategies. Promising comparison results with prior systems lend credence to the viability of this ap proach. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #117316. 	[Title] A Simulation of Adaptive Agents in a Hostile Environment [Abstract] In this paper we use the genetic programming technique to evolve programs to control an autonomous agent capable of learning how to survive in a hostile environment. In order to facilitate this goal, agents are run through random environment configurations. Randomly generated programs, which control the interaction of the agent with its environment, are recombined to form better programs. Each generation of the population of agents is placed into the Simulator with the ultimate goal of producing an agent capable of surviving any environment. The environment that an agent is presented consists of other agents, mines, and energy. The goal of this research is to construct a program which when executed will allow an agent (or agents) to correctly sense, and mark, the presence of items (energy and mines) in any environment. The Simulator determines the raw fitness of each agent by interpreting the associated program. General programs are evolved to solve this problem. Different environmental setups are presented to show the generality of the solution. These environments include one agent in a fixed environment, one agent in a fluctuating environment, and multiple agents in a fluctuating environment cooperating together. The genetic programming technique was extremely successful. The average fitness per generation in all three environments tested showed steady improvement. Programs were successfully generated that enabled an agent to handle any possible environment. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #17477. 	[Title] Co-Evolving Soccer Softbot Team Coordination with Genetic Programming [Abstract] Genetic Programming is a promising new method for automatically generating functions and algorithms through natural selection. In contrast to other learning methods, Genetic Programming's automatic programming makes it a natural approach for developing algorithmic robot behaviors. In this paper we present an overview of how we apply Genetic Programming to behavior-based team coordination in the RoboCup Soccer Server domain. The result is not just a hand-coded soccer algorithm, but a team of softbots which have learned on their own how to play a reasonable game of soccer. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #116553. 	[Title] A Survey of Intron Research in Genetics [Abstract] A brief survey of biological research on non-coding DNA is presented here. There has been growing interest in the effects of non-coding segments in evolutionary algorithms (EAs). To better understand and conduct research on non-coding segments and EAs, it is important to understand the biological background of such work. This paper begins with a review of basic genetics and terminology, describes the different types of non-coding DNA, and then surveys recent intron research. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #254923. 	[Title] A genetic prototype learner [Abstract] Supervised classification problems have received considerable attention from the machine learning community. We propose a novel genetic algorithm based prototype learning system, PLEASE, for this class of problems. Given a set of prototypes for each of the possible classes, the class of an input instance is determined by the prototype nearest to this instance. We assume ordinal attributes and prototypes are represented as sets of feature-value pairs. A genetic algorithm is used to evolve the number of prototypes per class and their positions on the input space as determined by corresponding feature-value pairs. Comparisons with C4.5 on a set of artificial problems of controlled complexity demonstrate the effectiveness of the pro posed system. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #578898. 	[Title] Clique Detection via Genetic Programming  Topics in Combinatorial Optimization [Abstract] Genetic Programming is utilized as a technique for detecting cliques in a network. Candidate cliques are represented in lists, and the lists are manipulated such that larger cliques are formed from the candidates. The clique detection problem has some interesting implications to the Strongly Typed Genetic Programming paradigm, namely in forming a class hierarchy. The problem is also useful in that it is easy to add noise. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #578645. 	[Title] Entailment for Specification Refinement [Abstract] Specification refinement is part of formal program derivation, a method by which software is directly constructed from a provably correct specification. Because program derivation is an intensive manual exercise used for critical software systems, an automated approach would allow it to be viable for many other types of software systems. The goal of this research is to determine if genetic programming (GP) can be used to automate the specification refinement process. The initial steps toward this goal are to show that a well-known proof logic for program derivation can be encoded such that a GP-based system can infer sentences in the logic for proof of a particular sentence. The results are promising and indicate that GP can be useful in aiding pro gram derivation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #578646. 	[Title] Type Inheritance in Strongly Typed Genetic Programming [Abstract] This paper appears as chapter 18 of Kenneth E. Kinnear, Jr. and Peter J. Angeline, editors Advances in Genetic Programming 2, MIT Press, 1996. Abstract Genetic Programming (GP) is an automatic method for generating computer programs, which are stored as data structures and manipulated to evolve better programs. An extension restricting the search space is Strongly Typed Genetic Programming (STGP), which has, as a basic premise, the removal of closure by typing both the arguments and return values of functions, and by also typing the terminal set. A restriction of STGP is that there are only two levels of typing. We extend STGP by allowing a type hierarchy, which allows more than two levels of typing. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #578649. 	[Title] Augmenting Collective Adaptation with Simple Process Agents [Abstract] We have integrated the distributed search of genetic programming based systems with collective memory to form a collective adaptation search method. Such a system significantly improves search as problem complexity is increased. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement. In collective adaptation, search agents gather knowledge of their environment and deposit it in a central information repository. Process agents are then able to manipulate that focused knowledge, exploiting the exploration of the search agents. We examine the utility of increasing the capabilities of the centralized process agents. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1107418. 	[Title] Evolving Teamwork and Coordination with Genetic Programming [Abstract] Some problems can be solved only by multi-agent teams. In using genetic programming to produce such teams, one faces several design decisions. First, there are questions of team diversity and of breeding strategy. In one commonly used scheme, teams consist of clones of single individuals; these individuals breed in the normal way and are cloned to form teams during fitness evaluation. In contrast, teams could also consist of distinct individuals. In this case one can either allow free interbreeding between members of different teams, or one can restrict interbreeding in various ways. A second design decision concerns the types of coordination-facilitating mechanisms provided to individual team members; these range from sensors of various sorts to complex communication systems. This paper examines three breeding strategies (clones, free, and restricted) and three coordination mechanisms (none, deictic sensing, and name-based sensing) for evolving teams of agents in the Serengeti world, a simple predator/prey environment. Among the conclusions are the fact that a simple form of restricted interbreeding outperforms free interbreeding in all teams with distinct individuals, and the fact that name-based sensing consistently outperforms deictic sensing. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #246618. 	[Title] A comparison of the fixed and floating building block representation in the genetic algorithm [Abstract] This article compares the traditional, fixed problem representation style of a genetic algorithm (GA) with a new floating representation in which the building blocks of a problem are not fixed at specific locations on the individuals of the population. In addition, the effects of non-coding segments on both of these representations is studied. Non-coding segments are a computational model of non-coding DNA and floating building blocks mimic the location independence of genes. The fact that these structures are prevalent in natural genetic systems suggests that they may provide some advantages to the evolutionary process. Our results show that there is a significant difference in how GAs solve a problem in the fixed and floating representations. GAs are able to maintain a more diverse population with the floating representation. The combination of non-coding segments and floating building blocks appears to encourage a GA to take advantage of its parallel search and recombination abilities. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #578780. 	[Title] Towards Automatic Discovery of Building Blocks in Genetic Programming [Abstract] This paper presents an algorithm for the discovery of building blocks in genetic programming (GP) called adaptive representation through learning (ARL). The central idea of ARL is the adaptation of the problem representation, by extending the set of terminals and functions with a set of evolvable subroutines. The set of subroutines extracts common knowledge emerging during the evolutionary process and acquires the necessary structure for solving the problem. ARL supports subroutine creation and deletion. Subroutine creation or discovery is performed automatically based on the differential parent-offspring fitness and block activation. Subroutine deletion relies on a utility measure similar to schema fitness over a window of past generations. The technique described is tested on the problem of controlling an agent in a dynamic and non-deterministic environment. The automatic discovery of subroutines can help scale up the GP technique to complex problems. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1128291. 	[Title] A Comparison of Random Search versus Genetic Programming as Engines for Collective Adaptation [Abstract] We have integrated the distributed search of genetic programming (GP) based systems with collective memory to form a collective adaptation search method. Such a system significantly improves search as problem complexity is increased. Since the pure GP approach does not scale well with problem complexity, a natural question is which of the two components is actually contributing to the search process. We investigate a collective memory search which utilizes a random search engine and find that it significantly outperforms the GP based search engine. We examine the solution space and show that as problem complexity and search space grow, a collective adaptive system will perform better than a collective memory search employing random search as an engine. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1153899. 	[Title] ABSTRACT [Abstract] In general, the machine learning process can be accelerated through the use of heuristic knowledge about the problem solution. For example, monomorphic typed Genetic Programming (GP) uses type information to reduce the search space and improve performance. Unfortunately, monomorphic typed GP also loses the generality of untyped GP: the generated programs are only suitable for inputs with the specified type. Polymorphic typed GP improves over mono-morphic and untyped GP by allowing the type information to be expressed in a more generic manner, and yet still imposes constraints on the search space. This paper describes a polymorphic GP system which can generate polymorphic programs: programs which take inputs of more than one type and produces outputs of more than one type. We also demonstrate its operation through the generation of the map polymorphic program. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1153900. 	[Title] ABSTRACT In general, the machine learning process can be accelerated through the use of additional [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #594543. 	[Title] A Methodology for Processing Problem Constraints in Genetic Programming [Abstract] Search mechanisms of artificial intelligence combine two elements: representation, which determines the search space, and a search mechanism, which actually explores the space. Unfortunately, many searches may explore redundant and/or invalid solutions. Genetic programming refers to a class of evolutionary algorithms based on genetic algorithms but utilizing a parameterized representation in the form of trees. These algorithms perform searches based on simulation of nature. They face the same problems of redundant/invalid subspaces. These problems have just recently been addressed in a systematic manner. This paper presents a methodology devised for the public domain genetic programming tool lil-gp. This methodology uses data typing and semantic information to constrain the representation space so that only valid, and possibly unique, solutions will be explored. The user enters problem-specific constraints, which are transformed into a normal set. This set is checked for feasibility, and subsequently it is used to limit the space being explored. The constraints can determine valid, possibly unique space. Moreover, they can also be used to exclude subspaces the user considers uninteresting, using some problem-specific knowledge. A simple example is followed thoroughly to illustrate the constraint language, transformations, and the normal set. Experiments with boolean 11-multiplexer illustrate practical applications of the method to limit redundant space exploration by utilizing problem-specific knowledge. fl Supported by a grant from NASA/JSC: NAG 9-847. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #54129. 	[Title] Strongly Typed Genetic Programming [Abstract] BBN Technical Report #7866: Abstract Genetic programming is a powerful method for automatically generating computer programs via the process of natural selection [Koza 92]. However, it has the limitation known as "closure", i.e. that all the variables, constants, arguments for functions, and values returned from functions must be of the same data type. To correct this deficiency, we introduce a variation of genetic programming called "strongly typed" genetic programming (STGP). In STGP, variables, constants, arguments, and returned values can be of any data type with the provision that the data type for each such value be specified beforehand. This allows the initialization process and the genetic operators to only generate syntactically correct parse trees. Key concepts for STGP are generic functions, which are not true strongly typed functions but rather templates for classes of such functions, and generic data types, which are analogous. To illustrate STGP, we present four examples involving vector/matrix manipulation and list manipulation: (1) the multi-dimensional least-squares regression problem, (2) the multi-dimensional Kalman filter, (3) the list manipulation function NTH, and (4) the list manipulation function MAPCAR. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593022. 	[Title] 1 GP-COM: A Distributed, Component-Based Genetic Programming System in C++ [Abstract] Widespread adoption of Genetic Programming techniques as a domain-independent problem solving tool depends on a good underlying software structure. A system is presented that mirrors the conceptual makeup of a GP system. Consisting of a loose collection of software components, each with strict interface definitions and roles, the system maximises flexibility and minimises effort when applied to a new problem domain. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #1128319 has the title `Modeling Distributed Search via Social Insects  
` and the abstract `Complex group behavior arises in social insects colonies as the integration of the actions of simple and redundant individual insects [Adler and Gordon, 1992, Oster and Wilson, 1978]. Furthermore, the colony can act as an information center to expedite foraging [Brown, 1989]. We apply these lessons from natural systems to model collective action and memory in a computational agent society. Collective action can expedite search in combinatorial optimization problems [Dorigo et al., 1996]. Collective memory can improve learning in multi-agent systems [Garland and Alterman, 1996]. Our collective adaptation integrates the simplicity of collective action with the pattern detection of collective memory to significantly improve both the gathering and processing of knowledge. As a test of the role of the society as an information center, we examine the ability of the society to distribute task allocation without any omnipotent centralized control. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1128319 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #1128319 has the title `Modeling Distributed Search via Social Insects  
` and the abstract `Complex group behavior arises in social insects colonies as the integration of the actions of simple and redundant individual insects [Adler and Gordon, 1992, Oster and Wilson, 1978]. Furthermore, the colony can act as an information center to expedite foraging [Brown, 1989]. We apply these lessons from natural systems to model collective action and memory in a computational agent society. Collective action can expedite search in combinatorial optimization problems [Dorigo et al., 1996]. Collective memory can improve learning in multi-agent systems [Garland and Alterman, 1996]. Our collective adaptation integrates the simplicity of collective action with the pattern detection of collective memory to significantly improve both the gathering and processing of knowledge. As a test of the role of the society as an information center, we examine the ability of the society to distribute task allocation without any omnipotent centralized control. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1128319 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Genetic_Algorithms