Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1103383. 	[Title] Culture Enhances the Evolvability of Cognition [Abstract] This paper discusses the role of culture in the evolution of cognitive systems. We define culture as any information transmitted between individuals and between generations by non-genetic means. Experiments are presented that use genetic programming systems that include special mechanisms for cultural transmission of information. These systems evolve computer programs that perform cognitive tasks including mathematical function mapping and action selection in a virtual world. The data show that the presence of culture-supporting mechanisms can have a clear beneficial impact on the evolvability of correct programs. The implications that these results may have for cognitive science are briefly discussed. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #22241. 	[Title] Simultaneous Evolution of Programs and their Control Structures Simultaneous Evolution of Programs and their Control [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #190697. 	[Title] Analysis of Neurocontrollers Designed by Simulated Evolution [Abstract] Randomized, adaptive, greedy search using evolutionary algorithms offers a powerful and versatile approach to the automated design of neural network architectures for a variety of tasks in artificial intelligence and robotics. In this paper we present results from the evolutionary design of a neuro-controller for a robotic bulldozer. This robot is given the task of clearing an arena littered with boxes by pushing boxes to the sides. Through a careful analysis of the evolved networks we show how evolution exploits the design constraints and properties of the environment to produce network structures of high fitness. We conclude with a brief summary of related ongoing research examining the intricate interplay between environment and evolutionary processes in determining the structure and function of the resulting neural architectures. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1112911. 	[Title] Evolution of Iteration in Genetic Programming D a v d A The solution to many [Abstract] This paper introduces the new operation of restricted iteration creation that automatically Genetic programming extends Holland's genetic algorithm to the task of automatic programming. Early work on genetic programming demonstrated that it is possible to evolve a sequence of work-performing steps in a single result-producing branch (that is, a one-part "main" program). The book Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection (Koza 1992) describes an extension of Holland's genetic algorithm in which the genetic population consists of computer programs (that is, compositions of primitive functions and terminals). See also Koza and Rice (1992). In the most basic form of genetic programming (where only a single result-producing branch is evolved), genetic programming demonstrated the capability to discover a sequence (as to both its length and its content) of work-performing steps that is sufficient to produce a satisfactory solution to several problems, including many problems that have been used over the years as benchmarks in machine learning and artificial intelligence. Before applying genetic programming to a problem, the user must perform five major preparatory steps, namely identifying the terminals (inputs) of the to-be-evolved programs, identifying the primitive functions (operations) contained in the to-be-evolved programs, creating the fitness measure for evaluating how well a given program does at solving the problem at hand, choosing certain control parameters (notably population size and number of generations to be run), and determining the termination criterion and method of result designation (typically the best-so-far individual from the populations produced during the run). creates a restricted iteration-performing Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #459216. 	[Title] Neural Programming and an Internal Reinforcement Policy [Abstract] An important reason for the continued popularity of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in the machine learning community is that the gradient-descent backpropagation procedure gives ANNs a locally optimal change procedure and, in addition, a framework for understanding the ANN learning performance. Genetic programming (GP) is also a successful evolutionary learning technique that provides powerful parameterized primitive constructs. Unlike ANNs, though, GP does not have such a principled procedure for changing parts of the learned system based on its current performance. This paper introduces Neural Programming, a connectionist representation for evolving programs that maintains the benefits of GP. The connectionist model of Neural Programming allows for a regression credit-blame procedure in an evolutionary learning system. We describe a general method for an informed feedback mechanism for Neural Programming, Internal Reinforcement. We introduce an Internal Reinforcement procedure and demon strate its use through an illustrative experiment. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #593105. 	[Title] 20 Data Structures and Genetic Programming  two techniques for reducing run time. [Abstract] In real world applications, software engineers recognise the use of memory must be organised via data structures and that software using the data must be independant of the data structures' implementation details. They achieve this by using abstract data structures, such as records, files and buffers. We demonstrate that genetic programming can automatically implement simple abstract data structures, considering in detail the task of evolving a list. We show general and reasonably efficient implementations can be automatically generated from simple primitives. A model for maintaining evolved code is demonstrated using the list problem. Much published work on genetic programming (GP) evolves functions without side-effects to learn patterns in test data. In contrast human written programs often make extensive and explicit use of memory. Indeed memory in some form is required for a programming system to be Turing Complete, i.e. for it to be possible to write any (computable) program in that system. However inclusion of memory can make the interactions between parts of programs much more complex and so make it harder to produce programs. Despite this it has been shown GP can automatically create programs which explicitly use memory [Teller 1994]. In both normal and genetic programming considerable benefits have been found in adopting a structured approach. For example [Koza 1994] shows the introduction of evolvable code modules (automatically defined functions, ADFs) can greatly help GP to reach a solution. We suggest that a corresponding structured approach to use of data will similarly have significant advantage to GP. Earlier work has demonstrated that genetic programming can automatically generate simple abstract data structures, namely stacks and queues [Langdon 1995a]. That is, GP can evolve programs that organise memory (accessed via simple read and write primitives) into data structures which can be used by external software without it needing to know how they are implemented. This chapter shows it is possible to evolve a list data structure from basic primitives. [Aho, Hopcroft and Ullman 1987] suggest three different ways to implement a list but these experiments show GP can evolve its own implementation. This requires all the list components to agree on one implementation as they co-evolve together. Section 20.3 describes the GP architecture, including use of Pareto multiple component fitness scoring (20.3.4) and measures aimed at speeding the GP search (20.3.5). The evolved solutions are described in Section 20.4. Section 20.5 presents a candidate model for maintaining evolved software. This is followed by a discussion of what we have learned (20.6) and conclusions that can be drawn (20.7). Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1128369. 	[Title] Automatic Generation of Adaptive Programs Automatic Generation of Adaptive Programs. In From Animals to Animats [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35061. 	[Title] Evolving Networks: Using the Genetic Algorithm with Connectionist Learning [Abstract]  Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #22229. 	[Title] The Automatic Programming of Agents that Learn Mental Models and Create Simple Plans of Action [Abstract] An essential component of an intelligent agent is the ability to notice, encode, store, and utilize information about its environment. Traditional approaches to program induction have focused on evolving functional or reactive programs. This paper presents MAPMAKER, an approach to the automatic generation of agents that discover information about their environment, encode this information for later use, and create simple plans utilizing the stored mental models. In this approach, agents are multipart computer programs that communicate through a shared memory. Both the programs and the representation scheme are evolved using genetic programming. An illustrative problem of 'gold' collection is used to demonstrate the approach in which one part of a program makes a map of the world and stores it in memory, and the other part uses this map to find the gold The results indicate that the approach can evolve programs that store simple representations of their environments and use these representations to produce simple plans. 1. Introduction Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #595193. 	[Title] Cultural Transmission of Information in Genetic Programming [Abstract] This paper shows how the performance of a genetic programming system can be improved through the addition of mechanisms for non-genetic transmission of information between individuals (culture). Teller has previously shown how genetic programming systems can be enhanced through the addition of memory mechanisms for individual programs [Teller 1994]; in this paper we show how Teller's memory mechanism can be changed to allow for communication between individuals within and across generations. We show the effects of indexed memory and culture on the performance of a genetic programming system on a symbolic regression problem, on Koza's Lawnmower problem, and on Wum-pus world agent problems. We show that culture can reduce the computational effort required to solve all of these problems. We conclude with a discussion of possible improvements. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #1107418. 	[Title] Evolving Teamwork and Coordination with Genetic Programming [Abstract] Some problems can be solved only by multi-agent teams. In using genetic programming to produce such teams, one faces several design decisions. First, there are questions of team diversity and of breeding strategy. In one commonly used scheme, teams consist of clones of single individuals; these individuals breed in the normal way and are cloned to form teams during fitness evaluation. In contrast, teams could also consist of distinct individuals. In this case one can either allow free interbreeding between members of different teams, or one can restrict interbreeding in various ways. A second design decision concerns the types of coordination-facilitating mechanisms provided to individual team members; these range from sensors of various sorts to complex communication systems. This paper examines three breeding strategies (clones, free, and restricted) and three coordination mechanisms (none, deictic sensing, and name-based sensing) for evolving teams of agents in the Serengeti world, a simple predator/prey environment. Among the conclusions are the fact that a simple form of restricted interbreeding outperforms free interbreeding in all teams with distinct individuals, and the fact that name-based sensing consistently outperforms deictic sensing. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #243483. 	[Title] A Comparison of Crossover and Mutation in Genetic Programming [Abstract] This paper presents a large and systematic body of data on the relative effectiveness of mutation, crossover, and combinations of mutation and crossover in genetic programming (GP). The literature of traditional genetic algorithms contains related studies, but mutation and crossover in GP differ from their traditional counterparts in significant ways. In this paper we present the results from a very large experimental data set, the equivalent of approximately 12,000 typical runs of a GP system, systematically exploring a range of parameter settings. The resulting data may be useful not only for practitioners seeking to optimize parameters for GP runs, but also for theorists exploring issues such as the role of building blocks in GP. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #144701. 	[Title] Evolution of Mapmaking: Learning, planning, and memory using Genetic Programming [Abstract] An essential component of an intelligent agent is the ability to observe, encode, and use information about its environment. Traditional approaches to Genetic Programming have focused on evolving functional or reactive programs with only a minimal use of state. This paper presents an approach for investigating the evolution of learning, planning, and memory using Genetic Programming. The approach uses a multi-phasic fitness environment that enforces the use of memory and allows fairly straightforward comprehension of the evolved representations . An illustrative problem of 'gold' collection is used to demonstrate the usefulness of the approach. The results indicate that the approach can evolve programs that store simple representations of their environments and use these representations to produce simple plans. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #1103383 has the title `Culture Enhances the Evolvability of Cognition  
` and the abstract `This paper discusses the role of culture in the evolution of cognitive systems. We define culture as any information transmitted between individuals and between generations by non-genetic means. Experiments are presented that use genetic programming systems that include special mechanisms for cultural transmission of information. These systems evolve computer programs that perform cognitive tasks including mathematical function mapping and action selection in a virtual world. The data show that the presence of culture-supporting mechanisms can have a clear beneficial impact on the evolvability of correct programs. The implications that these results may have for cognitive science are briefly discussed. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1103383 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #1103383 has the title `Culture Enhances the Evolvability of Cognition  
` and the abstract `This paper discusses the role of culture in the evolution of cognitive systems. We define culture as any information transmitted between individuals and between generations by non-genetic means. Experiments are presented that use genetic programming systems that include special mechanisms for cultural transmission of information. These systems evolve computer programs that perform cognitive tasks including mathematical function mapping and action selection in a virtual world. The data show that the presence of culture-supporting mechanisms can have a clear beneficial impact on the evolvability of correct programs. The implications that these results may have for cognitive science are briefly discussed. 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #1103383 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Genetic_Algorithms