Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #735311. 	[Title] On the Usage of Differential Evolution for Function Optimization Differential Evolution (DE) has recently proven [Abstract] assumed unless otherwise stated. Basically, DE generates new parameter vectors by adding the weighted difference between two population vectors to a third vector. If the resulting vector yields a lower objective function value than a predetermined population member, the newly generated vector replaces the vector, with which it was compared, in the next generation; otherwise, the old vector is retained. This basic principle, however, is extended when it comes to the practical variants of DE. For example an existing vector can be perturbed by adding more than one weighted difference vector to it. In most cases, it is also worthwhile to mix the parameters of the old vector with those of the perturbed one before comparing the objective function values. Several variants of DE which have proven to be useful will be described in the Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #35. 	[Title] 4 Implementing Application Specific Routines  Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Abstract] To implement a specific application, you should only have to change the file app.c. Section 2 describes the routines in app.c in detail. If you use additional variables for your specific problem, the easiest method of making them available to other program units is to declare them in sga.h and external.h. However, take care that you do not redeclare existing variables. Two example applications files are included in the SGA-C distribution. The file app1.c performs the simple example problem included with the Pascal version; finding the maximum of x 10 , where x is an integer interpretation of a chromosome. A slightly more complex application is include in app2.c. This application illustrates two features that have been added to SGA-C. The first of these is the ithruj2int function, which converts bits i through j in a chromosome to an integer. The second new feature is the utility pointer that is associated with each population member. The example application interprets each chromosome as a set of concatenated integers in binary form. The lengths of these integer fields is determined by the user-specified value of field size, which is read in by the function app data(). The field size must be less than the smallest of the chromosome length and the length of an unsigned integer. An integer array for storing the interpreted form of each chromosome is dynamically allocated and assigned to the chromosome's utility pointer in app malloc(). The ithruj2int routine (see utility.c) is used to translate each chromosome into its associated vector. The fitness for each chromosome is simply the sum of the squares of these integers. This example application will function for any chromosome length. SGA-C is intended to be a simple program for first-time GA experimentation. It is not intended to be definitive in terms of its efficiency or the grace of its implementation. The authors are interested in the comments, criticisms, and bug reports from SGA-C users, so that the code can be refined for easier use in subsequent versions. Please email your comments to rob@galab2.mh.ua.edu, or write to TCGA: The authors gratefully acknowledge support provided by NASA under Grant NGT-50224 and support provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant CTS-8451610. We also thank Hillol Kargupta for donating his tournament selection implementation. Booker, L. B. (1982). Intelligent behavior as an adaptation to the task environment (Doctoral dissertation, Technical Report No. 243. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Logic of Computers Group). Dissertations Abstracts International, 43(2), 469B. (University Microfilms No. 8214966) Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #735303. 	[Title] Differential Evolution A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces [Abstract] A new heuristic approach for minimizing possibly nonlinear and non differentiable continuous space functions is presented. By means of an extensive testbed, which includes the De Jong functions, it will be demonstrated that the new method converges faster and with more certainty than Adaptive Simulated Annealing as well as the Annealed Nelder&Mead approach, both of which have a reputation for being very powerful. The new method requires few control variables, is robust, easy to use and lends itself very well to parallel computation. Please summarise all the given information.

Above are papers related to the following paper: [Paper_ID] Paper #78511. 	[Title] GENETIC ALGORITHMS AND VERY FAST SIMULATED REANNEALING: A COMPARISON [Abstract] We compare Genetic Algorithms (GA) with a functional search method, Very Fast Simulated Reannealing (VFSR), that not only is efficient in its search strategy, but also is statistically guaranteed to find the function optima. GA previously has been demonstrated to be competitive with other standard Boltzmann-type simulated annealing techniques. Presenting a suite of six standard test functions to GA and VFSR codes from previous studies, without any additional fine tuning, strongly suggests that VFSR can be expected to be orders of magnitude more efficient than GA. Please summarise all the given information.

Paper #735311 has the title `On the Usage of Differential Evolution for Function Optimization Differential Evolution (DE) has recently proven
` and the abstract `assumed unless otherwise stated. Basically, DE generates new parameter vectors by adding the weighted difference between two population vectors to a third vector. If the resulting vector yields a lower objective function value than a predetermined population member, the newly generated vector replaces the vector, with which it was compared, in the next generation; otherwise, the old vector is retained. This basic principle, however, is extended when it comes to the practical variants of DE. For example an existing vector can be perturbed by adding more than one weighted difference vector to it. In most cases, it is also worthwhile to mix the parameters of the old vector with those of the perturbed one before comparing the objective function values. Several variants of DE which have proven to be useful will be described in the 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #735311 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].


Paper #735311 has the title `On the Usage of Differential Evolution for Function Optimization Differential Evolution (DE) has recently proven
` and the abstract `assumed unless otherwise stated. Basically, DE generates new parameter vectors by adding the weighted difference between two population vectors to a third vector. If the resulting vector yields a lower objective function value than a predetermined population member, the newly generated vector replaces the vector, with which it was compared, in the next generation; otherwise, the old vector is retained. This basic principle, however, is extended when it comes to the practical variants of DE. For example an existing vector can be perturbed by adding more than one weighted difference vector to it. In most cases, it is also worthwhile to mix the parameters of the old vector with those of the perturbed one before comparing the objective function values. Several variants of DE which have proven to be useful will be described in the 
`.
Question: Which category should Paper #735311 be classified as ?
You can select one from ['Neural_Networks', 'Case_Based', 'Theory', 'Reinforcement_Learning', 'Probabilistic_Methods', 'Rule_Learning', 'Genetic_Algorithms'].

This paper should be classified into: Neural_Networks