Premise: Mr. Speaker, the second petition deals with concerns about child pornography, specifically in British Columbia, and the fact that the B.C. Court of Appeal has struck down subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code that makes possession of child pornography a criminal offence and that the court decision is therefore placing children in British Columbia at risk.
Hypothesis: No one is concerned about the fact that the B.C. Court of Appeal struck down subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code that makes possession of child pornography a criminal offence.