Premise: That's right, I'm sorry, Justice. What I'm saying is not that it's the retrospectivity that makes the First Amendment argument troubling -- I mean, that drives our First Amendment argument. All I'm saying is, we have addressed the retrospective portion of CTEA, and so I'm saying in the retrospective portion of CTEA you would apply ordinary, intermediate First Amendment review, and you would ask --
Hypothesis: We haven't addressed the retrospective portion of CTEA