Premise: 8. Immediately following this Honourable Court's decision to grant the stay of the Feeney judgement, the Assistant Deputy Attorney General (Criminal Law) and I began receiving responses to a letter we had sent to our provincial counterparts on June 20, 1997, regarding the interim pro cedurcs, taken in each jurisdiction prior to the stay of the Feeney requesting the opinions of the provinces regarding a legislative scheme by which peace officers could obtain the constitutionally required warrant to enter a dwelling-house for the purposes of arrest.
Hypothesis: Immediately following this Honourable Court's decision to grant the stay of the Feeney judgement, the late Assistant Deputy Attorney General and I began receiving responses to a letter we had sent to our provincial counterparts on June 20, 1997, regarding the interim pro cedurcs, taken in each jurisdiction prior to the stay of the Feeney requesting the opinions of the provinces regarding a legislative scheme by which peace officers could obtain the constitutionally required warrant to enter a dwelling-house for the purposes of arrest.