Why is there not more extensive use of fiberglass reinforcing bars? It seems like it would be a natural choice for most projects involving shotcrete in wet applications, as well as conventionally placed concrete, especially in the types of jobs we do, such as the rehabilitation of existing concrete channels that usually contain acidic waters. I understand that anything other than steel is more expensive, but isn’t prevention now cheaper than remediation later?
Although similar in dimensions, fiberglass reinforcing has distinctly different structural properties when compared to conventional steel reinforcement. This is a question better answered by the fiberglass reinforcing industry or the structural engineering community. As the American Shotcrete Association, we do not get involved in the engineering design of structural sections. However, it should be pointed out that properly designed and applied shotcrete provides a very corrosion-resistant environment around embedded steel reinforcement, providing excellent long-term durability in normal exposure conditions.