Icannos/chess_studies huggingface dataset:
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W13"]
[Black "B13"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00013.4.20 Analyzed by National Master John Graves } 1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 d6 3. g3 f5 4. Bg2 Nf6 5. e3 g6 6. Nge2 Bg7 7. O-O O-O 8. d3 { d4 is also possible, but there is nothing wrong with d3. } 8... c6 9. b4 Be6 10. b5 d5 11. bxc6 bxc6 12. Qa4 g5 { g5 is a mistake, but with the center still fluid a wing 
demonstration can be dangerous.12...g5 also gives white 
time to develop an initiative. 12...e4 is tempting but 
that allows white to put uncomfortable pressure on the 
"d" line. 12...dc! followed by Qd3 gives black equality } 13. Ba3 Rf7 14. Rac1 Rd7 15. Bb4 { Why not cd right away? } 15... a5 16. Ba3 { cd5 is a possibility } 16... Bf7 17. cxd5 cxd5 18. Nb5 Na6 19. Rc6 Nb4 20. Bxb4 axb4 21. Qxb4 Rxa2 22. Nec3 Ra8 23. Nd6 Bf8 24. Nxf7 Rxf7 { Forced. Whit wins a pawn after 24...Bb4 25. Nd8 Bc3 26.Ne6 
hitting g5 and c3. } 25. Qb3 Ra3 26. Qc2 e4 27. dxe4 dxe4 28. Rd1 { White has the advantage due to the more harmonious nature 
of his pieces. He also has an advantage on the light squares. 
Namely f5 e6 and f7. } 28... Qe8 29. Nb5 Ra2 30. Qc4 Ra4 31. Qc2 Ra2 32. Qxa2 Qxc6 33. Nd4 Qd5 34. Qc2 Ng4 { This is incorrect. Qe5 is far superior. This gets black of 
the the a2-g8 diagonal and protects the f pawn, this gives 
black a chance to hold the game. } 35. h3 Ne5 { this loses at once, better was to admit the mistake and play 
the knight back to f6. } 36. Nxf5 Nd3 37. g4 h5 38. Qc8 Qa2 39. Rf1 Kh7 { The light squares really hurt black in the final stages of 
the game. } 40. Bxe4 ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W14"]
[Black "B14"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00014.4.21 Analyzed by National Master John Graves } 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Bc4 Bb4+ 5. c3 { This check only helps white. } 5... dxc3 6. bxc3 { 0-0 may also be possible. } 6... Bc5 { 6...Ba5 is better since it avoids losing a pawn by force. } 7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qd5+ Ke8 9. Qh5+ g6 10. Qxc5 d6 11. Qe3 Bg4 12. O-O Bxf3 13. Qxf3 Ne5 14. Qe2 Qf6 15. f4 Nc6 16. e5 { a good breakthrough. } 16... dxe5 17. fxe5 Qe6 18. Re1 { Nd2 is far superior. } 18... Nge7 19. Nd2 Kd7 20. Nf3 Raf8 21. Ng5 Qf5 22. e6+ Kc8 23. Nf7 Rhg8 24. Nh6 Qc5+ 25. Be3 Qxc3 26. Nxg8 Nxg8 27. Rac1 Qf6 28. Rxc6 bxc6 29. Qa6+ Kd8 30. Rd1+ { Oops! Qd3! wins at once. 30...Ke7 or e8 Qd7 mate.30...Kc8 
31.Qd7 Kb7 32.Rb1 Ka6 32.Qc6 Ka5 33.Qb5 mate. } 30... Ke7 31. Bc5+ Kxe6 32. Qc4+ Kf5 33. Rf1+ Kg5 34. Be3+ Kh5 35. Rxf6 Nxf6 36. Qe2+ Ng4 37. h3 g5 38. Qxg4+ Kg6 39. Qxg5+ Kf7 40. Qf5+ Ke8 41. Qe6+ ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W16"]
[Black "B16"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00016,4,23 Analyzed by National Master Corey Russell } 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 { This position is known as the Center Counter, or Scandinavian 
defense. While objectively sound for black, I don't recommend
 it as this early queen sortie, as it doesn't help black's 
central control much, plus black always has to be careful 
where he moves his queen again, as the monarch is always 
pushed around by White with an eventual Nc3 or c4. If black 
isn't careful, he could lose his queen easily, as this game 
demonstrates. } 3. d4 Nc6 { A good move by black. He gets his knight out, while at the 
same time puts pressure on White by threatening to capture on d4. } 4. Nf3 Nf6 { Natural, but inaccurate. An aggressive ...Bg4! followed
by castling queenside could really put the pressure on 
White's center. For example, if ...Bg4 5. c4?? Qe4+ 6. Be2 Bxf3 
7. gxf3 Qxd4 leaves black up a pawn! This is one reason why 
it's common for white to boot black's queen from the center 
as soon as possible by playing Nc3 move 2. As it stands, 
white gets a free hand to push black around. } 5. c4 Qa5+ { ? This only forces white to develop his bishop with a gain 
of time. Black has to accept the fact his only reasonable 
posts for her is d6 or d8. } 6. Bd2 Qb6 7. c5 { ?? The key blunder. Like it or not, black had to play 
7. ... Qf5. After this, White has a won game, and you played 
well to convert it. } 7... Qxb2 8. Bc3 Qxa1 9. Bxa1 Bg4 10. Be2 { A little passive, but of course a reasonable move. Instead 
Bb5, followed by Nbd2, Qa4 would really put the pressure on 
black. } 10... e6 11. h3 Bf5 12. Bb5 Rb8 13. O-O { Again, sound, but Nbd2, followed by Bxc6, and Qa4 and/or Ne5 
would make black resign soon. } 13... a6 14. Ba4 Be7 15. Re1 O-O 16. Bc2 { Why not 16. Nbd2? Then Bxc6 and Qa4 would pick up some of 
black's pawns for sure. There are many ways to win at this 
point. } 16... Bxc2 17. Qxc2 h6 18. Ne5 { Good. When up material (such as a Queen for a rook in your 
case), trade pieces. This makes the your material advantage 
more effective. } 18... Nb4 19. Qc4 Nbd5 20. Nc3 Rfd8 21. Ne4 c6 22. Nxf6+ Nxf6 23. Ng6 { This is okay, but if black replied 23. ... Bf8! 24. Nxf8 Kxf8, 
with the idea of not moving his pawns and establishing a blockade, 
it would make it more difficult for white to win. With the
text, black opens lines in White's favor. } 23... Bxc5 { ? } 24. dxc5 fxg6 25. Qxe6+ Kh7 26. Bxf6 gxf6 27. Qf7+ Kh8 28. Qxf6+ Kg8 29. Re7 ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W18"]
[Black "B18"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00018.4.25 Analyzed by National Master Corey Russell } 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. Nc3 d5 5. e3 c6 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O Nbd7 { While this plan is sound, white can get a slight pull by 
playing 8. cxd5 cxd5 9. Qb3 e6 (...Nb6 10. Ne5) 10. Bd2, 
and white can gain c-file occupatio first. Probably 
7. ... dxc4 8. Bxc4 Bg4 leads to better chances for equality, 
with the idea of an eventual ...e5 by black. } 8. Qc2 dxc4 9. Bxc4 Nb6 10. Bb3 Nfd5 11. Nxd5 { ? Definitely wrong. If white was planning this, he never 
should've posted his queen on c2, because now the lady will 
be exposed for free tempos by black. Instead, a3 or e4 are 
much more consistent...leaving white with a slight advantage 
(center, black's less than ideal knight on b6). } 11... cxd5 12. Bd2 Bf5 13. Qd1 Rc8 14. Ba5 Qd6 15. Bxb6 axb6 16. Qe2 { An automatic move...this connects rooks, but that's about it. 
Instead Qd2 is stronger. This would prevent blacks' queen 
from infiltrating b4, help insure white can contest the c-file 
(since the Q would be covering c1), and indirectly hinders an 
e5 break by black (because the black d-pawn would be hit by 
white's queen and bishop. Also, ...Bg4, followed by ...Bxf3, 
gxf3 is not dangerous for white. Remember: a weakness is only 
a weakness if it can be taken advantage of! This motif is seen 
often in Grandmaster (GM) chess. } 16... Bg4 17. h3 Bxf3 18. Qxf3 e6 19. Rac1 Qb4 20. Qe2 Rc6 21. Rxc6 { ? Now black mobilizes his pawns, white's bishop is bad, 
and will activate black's bishop as well, not to mention 
undoubling black's pawns for him. Because of the opposite 
colored bishops, white could put a much stiffer reistance 
by playing 21. Qd3 Rfc8 22. Rcd1!, and black has no access 
points (c2 is covered by the light squared bishop), and no 
way to boot white's bishop. Note that even if black sac'd 
his rook on c4 at some point, white doesn't even have to 
take it! Also, the d-line pressure would discourage a ...e5 
break by black. White would basically "shuffle", since black 
can't break through. } 21... bxc6 22. Qa6 c5 23. Rd1 cxd4 24. exd4 Bxd4 25. Qa3 Qc5 26. Qxc5 bxc5 27. Rd2 Rb8 { Good move, this restricts white's options, and indirectly 
prevents white from mobilizing his own pawn majority. } 28. Kf1 Kg7 29. Ke2 Kf6 30. f3 Ke5 31. Kd1 c4 32. f4+ Ke4 33. Bc2+ Ke3 34. b3 cxb3 35. Bxb3 Rb7 36. g3 Bc3 37. Rc2 d4 38. Rg2 { A well-played game by black...black made the most of his 
opportunities. With this game, it's hard to answer your 
question about strength...white made a number of positional 
errors, and black could be anywhere from an A-class player 
to grandmaster. I need more games to make a better evaluation 
in that regard. White played approx. B-player strength. 
Keep at it, and always go over any losses/draws you experience, 
so you can learn and improve even more. } 38... Kf3 ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W20"]
[Black "B20"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00020.5.02 Analyzed by National Master Corey Russell } 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. Nc3 e6 5. g4 Bg6 6. Nge2 c5 7. h4 h5 8. Nf4 Bh7 { This is all book so far, and this line is known to give 
a slight advantage to white. Development is critical for 
black...better is not to ...h5 at all, but ..h6, so that 
the bishop can retreat to to ..h7 safely. } 9. Nxh5 cxd4 10. Nb5 Qa5+ 11. Qd2 { ! Good move. 11 Bd2 Qb6 is uncomfortable for white. } 11... Bb4 12. Nxg7+ Kf8 13. c3 dxc3 14. bxc3 Bc5 15. Nh5 Be4 16. Rh3 { Excellent. Gets the rook out of danger, and puts it at 
an active post. } 16... Nc6 17. Qg5 Bg6 { ?! Dubious. Black's best defense is ...Rh7 } 18. Rf3 Bxh5 { This walks into White's hands. ...Ke8 would offer stiffer 
resistance. For example 19. Nf4?? Be7 would win white's 
queen (or a piece). } 19. gxh5 Rd8 20. Rg3 { Alert play. Normally, one should develop first before 
conducting such an blunt attack, but this move does take 
advantage of black's earlier missteps. } 20... Qb6 21. Rg2 { One of the few missteps by white. 21 Qg7+ Ke8 22 Rf3 would 
checkmate or win massive amount of material. } 21... Bxf2+ 22. Kd1 Bg3 23. Qxg3 Ke7 24. Qg7 Nh6 25. Bxh6 Rxh6 26. Qxh6 Nxe5 27. Qg7 Nd7 28. h6 e5 29. Qg5+ Ke6 30. Rb2 { After this, black really could resign. } 30... Rf8 31. Bh3+ f5 32. h7 { For the past few moves, white could have won black's queen 
with Nd4+ if he wished. } 32... Kf7 33. Qxf5+ Nf6 34. Nd6+ Kg7 35. Rg2+ Kh8 36. Rg8+ Nxg8 37. hxg8=Q+ Rxg8 38. Qh5+ Kg7 39. Qg5+ Kh7 40. Bf5+ Rg6 41. Qxg6+ Kh8 { If you really don't lose much, then for stronger opposition, 
I suggest going to your local chess club. Portland has 
strong chess players -- I know, I've played them! Also you 
can play on the internet, though for improving your slow 
chess I strongly recommend playing over the board. Your 
style is aggressive...balance that with defence, you should 
continue to do well. } 42. Nf7# ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W21"]
[Black "B21"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00021.5.04 Analyzed by National Master Corey Russell } 1. e4 Nc6 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d4 e5 { There was no reason take the free, central pawn at e4. 
If white tries to threaten checkmate and black's knight 
with Qf3, then d5! stops the mate threat and protects black's 
knight. Black would have the advantage. } 4. d5 Bc5 { A Knight is worth 3 pawns. You don't want to give it up 
for just a pawn, unless you have a really good reason. 
Correct was to preserve your knight with 4. ... Ne7, with 
the idea of ...Ng6, ...Bc5, ...d6. } 5. dxc6 bxc6 6. Bg5 O-O { 6. ... Bxf2+ 7. Kxf2 Nxe4+ wins two pawns (the bishop on 
g5 falls). This tactical motif is very common...watch for it. } 7. b3 d6 8. Nc3 Bg4 { Not good. White can win a piece with 9. Bxf6. Perhaps ...h6 
was in order. } 9. f3 Bh5 10. Na4 Bb4+ 11. c3 Ba3 { You need to preserve your bishop with 11. ... Ba5. With 
this move, white can now trap your bishop with 12. b4, 
with the idea of Qb3. } 12. Bc1 Bc5 13. Nxc5 dxc5 14. Ba3 Qc8 15. Bxc5 Rd8 { Again, isn't winning a pawn with 15. ... Nxe4 preferable? 
White can't take back or he'd lose his queen. } 16. Qc2 Nd7 17. Ne2 Nxc5 18. O-O Bxf3 { This is a hard position for black, but it's not time to 
throw away pieces yet. When in doubt, improve your worst 
pieces. Black would like to get his a-rook into the game. 
The best way to do that is ...Rd6, ...Qd7, and ...Rd8. 
If black can establish dominance over the d file (column), 
then he'd have a slight advantage despite having a worse 
pawn structure. } 19. Rxf3 Qd7 { Black's position was bad, but this makes it worse. Black 
needed to play ...Ne6 to block white's threat. Doubling 
on the d-line is still black's best bet. } 20. Rxf7 Qg4 { Black is dead lost after this. The only chance was to get 
the most for his queen with 20. ... Qxf7 21. Bxf7+ Kxf7, 
though white would still be winning. There is no way for 
black to rescue his game after this point. } 21. Rf4+ Ne6 22. Rxg4 h5 23. Rg6 Re8 24. Rxe6 Rxe6 25. Bxe6+ Kh7 26. Bf5+ g6 27. Be6 Re8 28. Bc4 Rf8 29. Qd3 g5 30. Qd7+ Kh6 31. Qe6+ Kg7 32. Qxe5+ Rf6 33. Qxg5+ Rg6 34. Qxh5 Rh6 35. Qf7+ Kh8 36. Qg8# { So in conclusion, don't give up pieces for pawns except 
for VERY good reasons (like forced checkmate). Also, 
when in doubt in what to move, improve your worst pieces. 
Masters do this themselves when a plan isn't obvious. 
In addition, try to concentrate your heavy pieces 
(rooks & queen) on open files (columns)...they are most 
effective in that setup. Try to look at forced moves, 
and try ask yourself, "Why did my opponent move there?". 
If you ask yourself that question, often you can see that 
he was trying to threaten your pawns/pieces or checkmate, 
and if you see his threat, you can parry it. } ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W23"]
[Black "B23"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00023.5.07 Analyzed by National Master John Graves } 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. c3 Bc5 10. Nbd2 O-O 11. Bc2 Nxf2 12. Rxf2 f6 13. exf6 Bxf2+ 14. Kxf2 Qxf6 15. Nf1 Ne5 16. Be3 Rae8 17. Bd4 { Okay now the real game can begin! 17.Bc5 is given as the 
main line leading to equality according to NCO. The text 
is also given as equal after 17...Bg4. } 17... Qh4+ 18. Kg1 Nxf3+ 19. gxf3 c6 20. Ng3 Qh3 21. Bd3 { Be5 gives white a small advantage. The plan is to put the 
pawn on f4 and to plug up both the open files. White will 
put the queen on d3 and put the rook on e1 and prepare a 
timely f5 with the attack. } 21... Kh8 22. Be2 a5 23. Be5 Bc8 24. f4 Qe6 25. Bh5 { I like 25. Qd4 alot better. Why declare your minor piece 
configuration? What if the knight wants to go to f5? What 
if the Bishop wants to eye the king on d3? Then the rook 
will fufill its role and play to e1 to support the f5 pawn 
break. Maybe white can play the rook to the "g" file with 
an attack. } 25... Re7 26. Qd4 Kg8 27. Rf1 Bb7 28. Qc5 { The Queen is just fine on d4, it keeps the black bishop nice 
and hemmed in. } 28... Rd7 29. Kg2 d4 30. Bxd4 Qxa2 31. Bg4 Rdf7 32. Rf2 { 32.c4!! seems to give white a clear edge. 32... Rf4? 33. Be6 Kh8 
34. Qf8! mating is one point. Any capture on c4 will lead to a 
white Be6 with an easy win. Blacks best move seems to be 32...Re8 
but 33. Bh5 g6 creates a nasty weakness on the dark squares. 
White will play 34. Be2 with a clear advantage. } 32... Rxf4 33. Rxf4 Rxf4 34. Kh3 Rxg4 35. Kxg4 Qxb2 36. Qe5 h5+ 37. Kxh5 Qxh2+ 38. Kg4 Bc8+ 39. Kf3 Qh8 40. Nh5 { Now black is just a piece down. White is clearly winning. } 40... Bd7 41. Qg5 Qh6 42. Qd8+ Be8 43. Qxe8+ Kh7 44. Qf7 Qg5 45. Nf6+ Kh6 46. Be3 gxf6 47. Bxg5+ { 47. Qf6 is faster. } 47... Kxg5 48. Ke4 a4 49. Qh7 a3 50. Qf5+ Kh4 51. Kf4 c5 52. Qg4# ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W25"]
[Black "B25"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00025.5.10 Analyzed by National Master Corey Russell } 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Be7 4. h4 { This is definitely not the best move. 4. dxe5 dxe5 5. Qxd8+ Kxd8 
6. Nxe5 wins a pawn with a great game for white. Among masters, 
this is usually winning. The text move, however, doesn't develop 
a piece, weakens white's kingside, and even concedes the g4 
square to black. I honestly can't see how this helps white. 
Piece development is critical...generally white would want to 
get his bishop out, his queen knight out, castle short, and 
basically get all white's pieces into the center to try to 
overwhelm black. } 4... Bg4 5. Be2 { Unnecessarily passive. More promising is 5. dxe5 Bxf3 (forced) 
6. Qxf3 dxe5 7. Bc4 Nf6 8. Be3 with a reasonable game for white. } 5... Bxf3 6. Bxf3 Bxh4 7. g3 Bf6 8. dxe5 Bxe5 9. Bf4 { Definitely a mistake. This hangs the pawn on b2 for no 
compensation. 9. Nd2!, however is more active, and can help 
drive away black's bishop with Nc4. } 9... Nc6 10. Rh5 { This entire rook maneuver should not work...it's too vulnerable 
to attack by black's pieces. Instead, the best white may have 
at this point is c3, to defend against the threat of ...Bxb2, 
plus deny the central d4 square for the black pieces. } 10... Nf6 11. Rh4 Bxb2 12. Nd2 Bxa1 13. Qxa1 Nb4 14. Qb2 a5 15. e5 { This does not work out at all, because this opens up the center 
when white's king is still uncastled, plus gives the d5 square 
to use for black's pieces. At this point, white probably had 
to console himself with 15. a3 Nc6 16 Qxb7, though black is 
certainly still better. } 15... dxe5 16. Bxe5 O-O 17. Rh5 { This hangs the rook (17. ... Nxh5 18. Bxh5 Qg5), but white's 
position is very difficult in any case. White cannot castle, 
and the center's wide open, chances look bleak that white can 
repair his position. } 17... Re8 18. Rg5 Ra6 { This is an excellent defensive move, as well as prepares 
for active operations on b6 or e6. } 19. Ne4 Nbd5 20. Be2 Rb6 21. Bb5 { Stepping into pins (now the rook on b6 pins the bishop on b5) 
is rarely good, and this is no exception. Black could have 
played 21 ... c6 and pretty much have forced white to resign. 
Notice that 22. Nxf6+ Nxf6 doesn't go anywhere, since the bishop 
on e5 would then be pinned. } 21... Re7 22. Nxf6+ Nxf6 23. Kf1 Qd1+ 24. Kg2 Qd5+ 25. Kh3 { This hastens the end, but there was no way for white to hold 
onto the position in any case. } 25... Qh1# { I know you say you play non-competitively, but actually 
playing better players is THE way to get better quickly. 
Failing that, you could check out some chess books out of 
the local library, but books can only teach so much. There's 
no substitute for experience. } ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W30"]
[Black "B30"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00030.5.15 Analyzed by Candidate Master Daniel Waite } 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. d3 d6 4. Be3 Be6 { Imagine that your computer needs repair. You get
your Acme Handy Dandy Computer Repair Tool Kit out and
start to repair the beast. What do you have to do
first? Answer: Open the kit so you can get the tools
out. You can hit the computer with the tool kit all
you want, but it won't fix the computer. You must get
the tools out of the kit. Chess is the same way. If
you want to crush your opponent, you must open the
game so you can get your tools (pieces) into position
where they are useful. Moving the Queen's Bishop to
e3 blocks the potential development of the King's
Bishop. } 5. Nh4 Na5 { Idea: Do not move a piece a second time in the
opening without a specific reason. It is almost
always a bad idea. The problem with moving a piece a
second time is that wastes time. Let's say you have
only 15 minutes to fix your computer and you take 14
minutes to get the Acme Handy Dandy Computer Repair
Tool Kit out. Remember to make the most efficient use
of your TIME and moves. Second idea: count the number
of squares the Knight can move to on f3 (eight), now
count the number of squares it can move to on h4
(four). Because FLEXIBILITY is important, remember,
"A Knight on the rim is dim [or grim]." Imagine a
really ugly Y2K bug creeping out of the shadows and
snatching a Knight you put on the edge of the board. } 6. Bf4 Bd5 { Here you had to move the Queen's Bishop again, if you
had put it here on move 4. you would have had a spare
move to make. It's like taking an extra turn. [Ever
wish you could take more than one turn at a time? 
Here is where you can do it, legally! By playing 4.
Bf4 you could now play anything else on move 6.] BTW,
your opponent helps by mindlessly copying your moves. } 7. e3 h6 { 7. e4 takes up more space in the center. Concentrate
your opening moves on the four squares in the center
of the board. If your video card needs to be replaced
why try to change your hard drive? Important Idea: 
BEFORE YOU MOVE: Ask yourself, "What is my opponent
threatening?" Answer: 8.... g5 [forking your Bishop
and Knight]. } 8. Be2 Bxg2 9. Rg1 Bh3 { There are three ways to deal with a threat: First,
move the piece that is threatened. Second, capture
the piece that is attacking [in this case 9. Nxg2 wins
the Bishop]. Or finally, ignore the threat and attack
something. This works when your threat is stronger
than your opponents' threat. } 10. Qd2 Qd7 ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W37"]
[Black "B37"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00037.5.22 Analyzed by Candidate Master Daniel Waite } 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e3 e6 4. Bd3 c5 5. c3 Nc6 { As a coach of children, I teach them insanely
aggressive openings up until they are over the 1500
mark. From 1500 - 1800 they learn the Colle - K. 
It's good for handling better opponents with explosive
possibilities. After 1800 I require them to play the
Torre and introduce them to the Queen's Gambit. The
Colle introduces the player to games that are "close"
(less given to the luck that the opponent will miss
something). In other words, creating advantages from
equal positions. Also it stretches them to understand
the position and play accordingly. } 6. O-O { 6. Nbd2 to prevent 6...Ne4, 7...f5. } 6... Bd6 7. Nbd2 O-O 8. Re1 { Better is the move 8. e4, because you do not need Re1
to accomplish your goal. } 8... Qc7 { Black has an ideal set up against the Colle - K. He
should have a very comfortable game. } ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W39"]
[Black "B39"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00039.5.25 Analyzed by Candidate Master Daniel Waite } 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 { The French Winawer. In theory it is solid yet
aggressive. You choose an older inflexible way to
meet it (and more difficult to defend against). 
Typically White will unleash a strong Kingside attack
with Qg4. } 4. e5 c5 5. a3 cxd4 $5 { This move makes sense. Objectively it may be
questionable but it offers Black two pluses. First it
gives Black the half-open c - file. Second it breaks
up the White center pawns. One reason for questioning
this move is that it does not appear to be consistent
with the objectives of Black's choice of opening. 
Always remember there is a plus in every negative on
the chessboard. Chess is an exchange of advantages
and disadvantages. For instance, if you drop a piece
you generally get two moves in exchange for it. 
Sometimes the two moves are more critical than the
piece. It is the reason that sacrifices work. That
is why chess coaches warn younger players to not chase
pawns. It is not worth the moves that are given up. 
In the games that I've seen, it appears that Black
wants a quick resolution to the game by choosing this
move. } 6. Qxd4 Bxc3+ { Interesting try for Black, typically the play would
be either ...Nc6 or ...Ba5. Again the move makes sense,
but remember in chess that there is an absolute truth
at work. Wrong moves should be punished by accurate
play. } 7. Qxc3 Nc6 8. Bb5 { At this point the idea would be to play Qg3. The
forcing of the ...g6 gives White a huge positional
advantage with the pawn at e5 and the absence of the
Black's dark square Bishop. If Black castles Kingside
he should not be able to defend himself. } 8... Bd7 9. Nf3 d4 $2 { This move is too ambitious at this point. Now Black
will be stuck with an over-extended pawn. In the French,
Black must defend first, THEN attack. Development was
essential on move 9. 
Again a move that makes sense. 9...d4 is not as bad as
you think. The move is not an "attack." Pawn moves
are seldom for purposes of "attack." As a general
rule, the idea of the pawn move is to gain or control
space. I do however agree that this move is ill timed
and too ambitious. In a sense the pawn is sacrificed
for open lines. The problem for Black is that these
open lines benefit White! BTW, in every defense the
idea is to "defend first, THEN attack." All attacks
must have positional justification. Black does have a
problem unraveling his development in the French
Defense - your opponent compounds this natural
problem. This is why I do not personal recommend the
French Defense you young players. If you are
interested in completely frustrating someone playing
the French Defense try the "Exchange Variation." It
takes all the fun out of it for Black. } 10. Qd3 ?
[Event "Analyzed Games"]
[Site "ChessDoctor.com"]
[Date "?.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "W40"]
[Black "B40"]
[Result "?"]
[ECO "?"]

{ 00040.6.03 Analyzed by Expert Tim Smith } 1. d4 f5 $6 { The Dutch defense is becoming less and less used in 
masterplay due to evolving opening theory and refuting 
ideas. Much stronger is the classic
King's Indian with 1...Nf6 or Queen's Pawn game with 1...d5. } ?
[Event "16ch-Ukr Kiev"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1948.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Khavin, A."]
[Black "Poliak"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C26"]
[EventDate "1948.??.??"]
[PlyCount "60"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. f4 Bxg1 5. Rxg1 d5 6. exd5 O-O 7. d3 Re8 ( 7... exf4 8. Bxf4 Bg4 9. Qd2 b5 ) 8. f5 e4 ( 8... Bxf5 9. Bg5 $1 { Lipnitsky/Ratner } ) 9. d4 e3 $1 10. Qf3 ( 10. g4 Ne4 ) 10... c6 $1 11. Bxe3 Qe7 12. Kd2 ( 12. dxc6 $5 ) 12... b5 13. Bd3 b4 14. Nd1 cxd5 15. Nf2 Ne4+ 16. Bxe4 dxe4 17. Qf4 Nd7 18. Qc7 Ba6 19. Qc6 Nb6 20. f6 Qd8 21. fxg7 Re6 22. Qc5 Nc4+ 23. Ke2 Qh4 24. g4 Rf6 25. Nxe4 Nd6+ 26. Kd1 Nxe4 27. Qxb4 Qxh2 28. Re1 Rc8 29. c3 Bd3 30. Rc1 Qg2 0-1
[Event "Tbilisi ch-SU"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1959.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Yuchtman, Y."]
[Black "Tal, M."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "C21"]
[EventDate "1959.??.??"]
[PlyCount "79"]

1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 Bb4 6. Bc4 Nf6 7. O-O Bxc3 8. bxc3 d6 9. e5 $1 dxe5 ( 9... Nxe5 10. Nxe5 dxe5 { YUCHTMAN-FURMAN,Tbilisi ch-SU 1959 } 11. Qb3 $5 $40 ) 10. Ng5 O-O ( 10... Be6 $5 11. Bxe6 fxe6 12. Qb3 Qd5 { Aronin } ) 11. Ba3 Qxd1 ( 11... Bg4 12. Qb3 Na5 13. Bxf7+ Kh8 14. Qa4 $36 { Yuchtman } ) 12. Raxd1 Bf5 13. Bxf8 Rxf8 14. Rfe1 ( 14. Bb5 $1 Nd8 15. Rfe1 e4 16. Bc4 $1 h6 17. Rxd8 $1 hxg5 18. Red1 $16 { Yuchtman } ) 14... h6 15. Nf3 Bg4 16. Rb1 $6 ( 16. Bb5 $1 e4 17. Bxc6 bxc6 18. h3 Bh5 19. g4 Nxg4 20. hxg4 Bxg4 21. Ne5 $16 { Yuchtman } ) 16... e4 17. Nd4 Ne5 18. Bf1 c5 19. Nb5 c4 20. f3 Bxf3 21. gxf3 Nxf3+ 22. Kf2 Ng4+ 23. Kg3 Nxe1 ( 23... f5 $5 ) 24. Rxe1 f5 25. Bxc4+ Kh7 { (?! Yuchtman) } 26. Be2 Ne5 27. Kf4 Ng6+ 28. Ke3 f4+ 29. Kd4 Kh8 $2 ( 29... Nh4 30. Kxe4 ( 30. Nc7 $1 e3 31. Nd5 g5 32. Bh5 $16 { Yuchtman } ) 30... Re8+ 31. Kd5 Re3 32. Kc4 Ng2 ) 30. Rg1 Nh4 31. Kxe4 Re8+ 32. Kd3 f3 33. Bd1 Ng2 34. Kd2 Nh4 35. Nd4 Rd8 36. Rf1 Rd5 37. Kd3 Ra5 38. Bb3 g5 39. Nxf3 Rf5 40. Nd2 1-0
[Event "E.Geller Simul"]
[Site "Odessa"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Geller, E P."]
[Black "Vasiljev, M."]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E88"]
[EventDate "1964.??.??"]
[PlyCount "38"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3 O-O 6. Be3 e5 7. d5 c6 8. Qd2 cxd5 9. cxd5 a6 10. O-O-O Nbd7 11. Nge2 b5 12. Kb1 Nb6 13. Nc1 b4 14. Bxb6 bxc3 15. Qe3 $2 ( 15. Qf2 Qd7 $13 ) 15... Rb8 $3 { ... Geller } 16. Bxd8 Rxb2+ 17. Ka1 c2 18. Kxb2 cxd1=N+ 19. Kb1 Nxe3 0-1
[Event "Monaco"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1967.??.??"]
[Round "11"]
[White "Fischer, R J."]
[Black "Geller, E P."]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[ECO "B97"]
[EventDate "1967.??.??"]
[PlyCount "50"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 Qb6 8. Qd2 Qxb2 9. Rb1 Qa3 10. f5 Nc6 11. fxe6 fxe6 12. Nxc6 bxc6 13. e5 Nd5 ( 13... dxe5 ) 14. Nxd5 cxd5 15. Be2 dxe5 16. O-O Bc5+ ( 16... Ra7 ) 17. Kh1 Rf8 18. c4 Rxf1+ 19. Rxf1 Bb7 ( 19... Bd4 20. Qc2 Qb2 21. Qxh7 $1 $18 Qxe2 22. Qg8+ Kd7 23. Qd8+ Kc6 24. cxd5+ Kb5 25. Qe8+ Kc4 26. Qc6+ Kd3 27. Rc1 Qb2 28. Qxa8 Bb7 29. Qf8 Qe2 30. Qa3+ Ke4 31. Qb4 { 1-0 Sirotkin-Sorokin/URS 1967 } ) ( 19... Ra7 20. cxd5 Rd7 21. Qc2 $18 { Djukic,Z-Marjanovic ,S YUG 1970 } ) ( 19... h6 $5 20. Bh5+ Kd7 21. Rf7+ Kc6 22. Bf3 e4 23. Bxe4 dxe4 24. Qf4 Bd7 25. Qxe4+ Kc7 26. Bf4+ e5 $1 27. Bxe5+ Bd6 28. Rxd7+ Kxd7 29. Qb7+ Ke6 30. Qd5+ Ke7 31. Qb7+ Ke6 $11 ( 31... Bc7 $6 32. Qxc7+ Ke6 33. h3 ) ) 20. Bg4 ( 20. Bd1 Be7 ( 20... Rc8 21. Qe2 $3 Be7 22. Qh5+ g6 $8 23. Qxh7 Bxg5 24. Qxg6+ Kd7 25. Qxg5 $16 Qd3 26. Rf7+ Kc6 27. Qg4 Kb6 28. Be2 Qe4 29. Qxe6+ Rc6 30. Qe7 Qxe2 31. Qb4+ { 1-0 Zhuravlev,N-Gutman/Riga 1967 } ) 21. Bxe7 Kxe7 ( 21... Qxe7 22. Ba4+ Kd8 23. cxd5 exd5 24. Qa5+ Kc8 25. Qb6 Kb8 26. Bc6 Ra7 27. Bxd5 a5 28. Rf7 { 1-0 Joseph-Scalisi/cr ITA 1972 } ) 22. Qg5+ Kd6 23. Rf7 Re8 24. c5+ ( 24. Rxb7 Qd3 $13 ) 24... Qxc5 25. Rxb7 Qf2 26. h3 Qe1+ 27. Kh2 Qxd1 28. Qxg7 $18 ) ( 20. Qc2 e4 ( 20... Be7 21. Bh5+ ( 21. Qxh7 $16 ) 21... g6 22. Bxg6+ hxg6 23. Qxg6+ Kd7 24. Bxe7 $18 ) 21. Bg4 Bc8 ( 21... Be7 22. Qf2 O-O-O 23. Bf4 $1 $18 { Tal-Bogdanovic/Budva 1967 } ) 22. cxd5 ( 22. Rd1 Bd7 ( 22... Qb4 $13 ) 23. cxd5 Ba4 24. Qxe4 $18 Bxd1 25. dxe6 Rd8 26. Qxh7 { 1-0 Fransson,P-Persson,B/cr 1978 } ) 22... Qd3 23. Qc1 e5 $2 ( 23... exd5 24. Qf4 Qxf1+ 25. Qxf1 Bxg4 26. Qa1 $16 ) ( 23... Qxd5 ) 24. Rd1 ( 24. Be7 $3 $18 ) 24... Qb5 25. Bxc8 Rxc8 26. Qc3 $1 { Lepeskin } 26... Kf7 27. Qh3 Re8 28. Qxh7 $16 ) ( 20. Rf3 $13 { Gipslis } ) 20... dxc4 21. Bxe6 $2 ( 21. Qc2 Qd3 22. Qa4+ Qd7 23. Qxd7+ Kxd7 24. Rf7+ Kc8 25. Bxe6+ Kb8 26. Rxg7 ) 21... Qd3 22. Qe1 Be4 23. Bg4 Rb8 24. Bd1 Kd7 25. Rf7+ Ke6 0-1
[Event "Kiev ch-SU Jr"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1983.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Prokofiev, V."]
[Black "Serper, G."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1983.??.??"]
[PlyCount "69"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Nc3 Bg7 6. Be3 Nf6 7. Bc4 O-O 8. Bb3 d6 9. f3 Bd7 10. Qd2 Ne5 11. O-O-O Rc8 12. Bg5 Nc4 13. Bxc4 Rxc4 14. e5 Ne8 15. Rhe1 ( 15. Qe2 Rxc3 $1 16. exd6 ( 16. bxc3 Bxe5 $44 ) 16... Qa5 $3 17. Bd2 ( 17. dxe7 Qxg5+ 18. Kb1 Rc8 19. exf8=Q+ Kxf8 { Wahls-Feick,Berlin 1989 } ) 17... Qxa2 18. Bxc3 Bh6+ $19 ) 15... f6 ( 15... Bxe5 $1 16. Rxe5 dxe5 17. Ndb5 Nd6 $1 18. Nxd6 Rd4 19. Qe2 f6 $1 ( 19... Rxd1+ 20. Qxd1 f6 21. Bh6 exd6 22. Bxf8 Qxf8 23. Qd5+ $16 ) 20. Nxb7 ( 20. Bh6 Rxd6 ) ( 20. Rxd4 exd4 21. Nxb7 Qb6 $1 ) 20... Qb6 $1 21. Bh6 ( 21. Rxd4 exd4 ) 21... Re8 ( 21... Qxb7 $4 22. Rxd4 exd4 23. Qxe7 ) ( 21... Rxd1+ 22. Qxd1 Qxb7 23. Bxf8 Kxf8 ) 22. Na5 ( 22. Rxd4 exd4 23. Ne4 ( 23. Qc4+ Be6 $17 ) 23... Bb5 $1 ) 22... Qxa5 23. Rxd4 exd4 24. Qc4+ Kh8 $1 ( 24... e6 25. Qxd4 Qh5 26. Be3 $44 ) 25. Qf7 Rg8 26. Qxe7 Qe5 $1 ) 16. exd6 $13 e5 17. Nde2 Rxc3 18. Nxc3 fxg5 19. Qd5+ Rf7 20. Qxb7 Bh3 21. Qb3 Bxg2 22. Ne4 Bf8 23. d7 Nc7 24. Rg1 Bxf3 25. Nxg5 Bd5 26. Rxd5 Bh6 27. Rd2 Bxg5 28. Rxg5 Kg7 29. Rxe5 Rf1+ 30. Rd1 Rxd1+ 31. Kxd1 Qxd7+ 32. Kc1 Qd4 33. Re7+ Kf6 34. Rf7+ Ke5 35. Qg3+ { Golubev,M / Klubis,V  Simferopol 1989 (NIC YB/13) } 1-0
[Event "Yurmala ch-SU Jr"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1985.??.??"]
[Round "10"]
[White "Meyers, W."]
[Black "Rozenthal, A."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1985.??.??"]
[PlyCount "61"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. Bc4 Bd7 10. O-O-O Rc8 11. Bb3 Ne5 12. Bg5 Nc4 13. Bxc4 Rxc4 14. e5 Ne8 15. Rhe1 f6 16. exf6 Nxf6 17. Qe3 ( 17. Ne6 Bxe6 18. Rxe6 ) 17... Qb6 18. Qd3 Qc5 19. h4 Kf7 20. Nb3 Qc8 21. g4 b5 22. h5 gxh5 23. Bxf6 Bxf6 24. Qxh7+ Ke8 25. Nd5 Be6 26. Qxh5+ Kd8 27. Nxf6 Rxc2+ 28. Kb1 Bxb3 29. axb3 Rxf6 30. Qh8+ Kd7 31. Qh7 1-0
[Event "Cham"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1987.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mainka, Ro"]
[Black "Schneider, At"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[BlackElo "2410"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1987.??.??"]
[PlyCount "90"]
[WhiteElo "2460"]

{ 45/(256) } 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Bc4 Nc6 9. Qd2 Bd7 10. O-O-O Ne5 11. Bb3 Rc8 12. Bg5 Nc4 13. Bxc4 ( 13. Qd3 b5 ( 13... Ne5 $5 ) 14. Rhe1 Re8 ( 14... a5 15. Bxc4 bxc4 16. Qe3 Rc5 $13 ) 15. f4 b4 16. Nd5 Nxd5 17. Bxc4 $13 { Byrne-Watson,London 1991 } ) ( 13. Qe2 $6 Nxb2 14. Kxb2 Rxc3 15. Bxf6 Rxb3+ 16. axb3 Bxf6 17. c3 Qb6 18. f4 e5 ( 18... Qc5 $1 $17 { Miles/Moskow } ) 19. fxe5 Bxe5 20. Qd3 Rc8 21. Rhf1 Be6 22. Rc1 Bc4 23. Qh3 Rc7 24. Rfd1 Rc5 25. Rc2 Kg7 26. Ra1 Rc7 27. Ra4 a5 28. Qe3 Kg8 29. b4 Rc5 30. Kc1 axb4 31. Ra8+ Kg7 32. Nf5+ Kf6 33. Qh6 Ke6 { Nunn-Mestel,Birmingham 1976 } 34. Nd4+ $1 Bxd4 35. cxd4 Ra5 36. d5+ Kd7 37. Rxa5 Qxa5 38. Qh3+ Ke7 39. Rxc4 { Miles/Moskow } ) 13... Rxc4 14. Nb3 ( 14. e5 dxe5 15. Nb3 Rc7 16. Nb5 Bf5 17. Nxc7 Qxc7 18. g4 Be6 19. Rhe1 Rc8 20. Kb1 Nd5 21. Re2 Nb6 $44 { Hartmann-Weiner,Muenchen 1976 } ) 14... Be6 15. e5 Ne8 16. Rhe1 ( 16. exd6 $6 Nxd6 17. Nb5 ( 17. Bxe7 Qxe7 18. Qxd6 Qf6 $36 { A.Schneider/I.Farago } ) 17... Qb6 18. Nxd6 exd6 $17 { Povah-Watson,London 1979 } ) 16... Qc7 17. Nb5 Qb6 18. Na3 Rc7 19. Be3 Qc6 ( 19... Qa6 $1 20. exd6 Nxd6 21. Nc5 Rxc5 22. Bxc5 Nc4 23. Nxc4 Qxc4 24. Qb4 Qxa2 $13 { A.Schneider/I.Farago i45/(256) } ( 24... Bh6+ $1 { - G.Kosanovic } ) ) 20. Bf4 dxe5 21. Bxe5 Bxe5 22. Rxe5 Bxb3 23. axb3 Nd6 24. Kb1 Rfc8 25. h4 Nf5 26. h5 Qf6 27. Rd5 gxh5 28. g4 hxg4 29. fxg4 Nd6 30. Rh1 Rc5 31. Rd3 Rg5 32. Rdh3 Rg7 33. Rh6 Qf3 34. Qh2 Qe4 35. g5 Rf8 36. Ka2 a6 37. c3 b5 38. Nc2 a5 39. Nd4 a4 40. b4 a3 41. Nc6 axb2 42. g6 Qxc6 43. Rxh7 Ra8+ 44. Kxb2 Nc4+ 45. Kb1 Qe4+ 0-1
[Event "Tbilisi ch-SU"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1987.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ioseliani, N."]
[Black "Shafranska, A."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1987.??.??"]
[PlyCount "43"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. Bc4 Bd7 10. O-O-O Rc8 11. Bb3 Ne5 12. Bg5 Rc5 ( 12... Qa5 13. Rhe1 Nc6 14. Nd5 Qd8 15. Nxf6+ exf6 16. Nxc6 Rxc6 17. Bf4 Qb6 18. Bxd6 Rfc8 19. Qd4 Qa6 20. Kb1 Be6 21. Bf4 g5 22. Be3 Rxc2 { Semenenko-Yu.Isaev,corr 1988 } ) ( 12... b5 13. Ndxb5 $1 ( 13. f4 Nc4 14. Bxc4 Rxc4 15. e5 Ne8 16. Nd5 $2 ( 16. Ndxb5 $1 { (Pachmann) } 16... Qa5 17. Na3 $16 { NIC-YB/4 } ) 16... f6 17. Bh4 dxe5 18. Nxb5 Bf5 $1 19. c3 Kh8 { Weiner-de Carbonell,Muenchen 1975 } ) 13... Bxb5 14. Nxb5 Qb6 15. Qe2 $1 Rc5 ( 15... Rb8 16. Nc3 Rfc8 17. Bxf6 exf6 18. Nd5 Qb7 19. Rd4 { Johnston-Baart,The Hague 1975 } ) 16. Nc3 Nd3+ ( 16... Rxc3 17. bxc3 $16 { Be3-d4 Miles/Moskow 1979 } ) 17. Rxd3 ( 17. cxd3 $1 Rxg5 18. d4 $16 { Miles/Moskow } ) 17... Rxg5 18. f4 Ra5 19. Re1 $16 { (Geller ECO 1984) PLANINC-MILES,Hastings 1974/75 } ) 13. Rhe1 b5 14. f4 Nc4 ( 14... b4 $5 { Strutinskaya } ) 15. Bxc4 bxc4 16. e5 ( 16. Bxf6 $5 ) 16... dxe5 17. Nf3 $1 ( 17. fxe5 $13 Nd5 ) 17... exf4 18. Ne5 ( 18. Bxf6 Bxf6 19. Qxd7 Qa5 $5 ( 19... Qb6 $2 ) ) 18... Qa5 $6 ( 18... Rxe5 19. Rxe5 Qb6 ) 19. Bxf6 Bxf6 20. Nxd7 Bxc3 21. Qxc3 Qxa2 22. Qa3 { [Golubev] } 1-0
[Event "Corr. Ukraine Cup"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1988.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Sluchevsky"]
[Black "Blumental"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1988.??.??"]
[PlyCount "63"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. Bc4 Bd7 10. h4 Rc8 11. Bb3 h5 12. O-O-O Ne5 13. Bg5 Rc5 14. Kb1 b5 15. Rhe1 a5 16. f4 Nc4 17. Bxc4 Rxc4 18. e5 b4 19. Qd3 Rxc3 $1 20. bxc3 Nd5 21. Nb5 Nxc3+ 22. Nxc3 bxc3 23. Ka1 Bf5 24. Qa6 $6 d5 $2 ( 24... Bxc2 $1 $17 25. Rxd6 ( 25. Rc1 Bf5 ) 25... Qxd6 $3 26. exd6 Bd1 $3 ( 26... Bd3 $2 27. dxe7 $1 $16 ) 27. Kb1 ( 27. Re5 c2 28. Qc6 Rb8 29. a4 exd6 $19 ) 27... c2+ 28. Kc1 Bb2+ $1 29. Kxb2 Rb8+ $19 { Golubev,M } ) ( 24... f6 $6 $11 { Santo-Roman - Koch,1991 } ) 25. Qb7 $1 f6 26. exf6 exf6 27. Re7 $18 Qxe7 28. Qxe7 fxg5 29. Rxd5 Bf6 30. Qe2 gxf4 31. Rxf5 gxf5 32. Qxh5 1-0
[Event "Match"]
[Site "Odessa "]
[Date "1988.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Golubev, M."]
[Black "Telitsyn, A."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1988.??.??"]
[PlyCount "93"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. Bc4 Bd7 10. O-O-O Rc8 11. Bb3 Ne5 12. Bg5 Rc5 13. f4 ( 13. Rhe1 ) 13... Nc4 ( 13... Rxc3 $6 ) ( 13... Nc6 14. e5 Rxc3 ) 14. Bxc4 ( 14. Qd3 $5 ) 14... Rxc4 15. e5 Ne8 ( 15... Rxc3 16. Qxc3 Ne4 17. Qb4 $16 ) ( 15... dxe5 16. fxe5 ( 16. Nde2 exf4 17. Bxf6 Bxf6 18. Qxd7 Qb6 19. Rd3 Rfc8 20. Rhd1 Kg7 ) 16... Ng4 17. Nf3 h6 $8 18. Qxd7 ( 18. h3 Nxe5 19. Nxe5 Bxe5 20. Bxh6 Bd6 ) 18... Qxd7 19. Rxd7 hxg5 20. Rxe7 b5 $16 ) 16. Qe2 ( 16. Nd5 ) 16... Rxc3 17. bxc3 { (Tandai-Herbrechtsmeier,1986 cr) } ( 17. exd6 ) 17... dxe5 ( 17... f6 $5 ) 18. fxe5 Qa5 ( 18... Qc7 $5 ) 19. Nb3 ( 19. Bxe7 $5 ) 19... Qa3+ 20. Kb1 Be6 21. Rd4 ( 21. Qb5 $5 ) 21... Nc7 22. Bc1 Qa6 23. Qxa6 bxa6 24. Re1 Nb5 $44 25. Rd3 Bf5 26. Rde3 Rc8 27. Bb2 Bh6 28. Rf3 a5 ( 28... Rc4 $5 ) 29. a4 Nc7 30. Nd4 Bd7 31. Ref1 Nd5 ( 31... Be8 ) 32. Rxf7 Bxa4 33. e6 Rb8 34. Ka1 Be8 35. R7f3 Bg7 36. Rd3 a4 37. Ka2 Rc8 $2 ( 37... Bf6 ) 38. Nf5 $1 Bb5 39. Nxg7 Bxd3 40. cxd3 Kxg7 41. c4+ Nf6 42. d4 Rxc4 43. d5 Rc2 44. d6 Rxb2+ 45. Kxb2 exd6 46. e7 Kf7 47. Rxf6+ { Golubev,1988 } 1-0
[Event "Corr."]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1988.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Flomin, A."]
[Black "Isaev, Yu"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1988.??.??"]
[PlyCount "39"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. Bc4 Bd7 10. O-O-O Rc8 11. Bb3 Ne5 12. Bg5 Rc5 13. Rhe1 b5 ( 13... Qa5 ) 14. f4 Nc4 ( 14... b4 $6 15. Nd5 $16 ) 15. Bxc4 ( 15. Qd3 $13 ) 15... bxc4 ( 15... Rxc4 16. e5 b4 $1 ( 16... dxe5 $6 17. fxe5 ( 17. Ndxb5 $5 a6 18. Bxf6 ( 18. fxe5 $6 axb5 19. exf6 exf6 20. Be3 b4 ) 18... exf6 ( 18... Bxf6 $2 19. fxe5 ) 19. Qxd7 Qxd7 20. Rxd7 axb5 $14 ) 17... b4 18. exf6 ( 18. Qd3 $5 ) 18... exf6 19. Qd3 $16 ) 17. Qd3 $1 ( 17. exf6 exf6 18. Qd3 bxc3 19. Qxc4 cxb2+ 20. Kb1 fxg5 $13 ) ( 17. Qe2 $13 ) 17... Rxd4 18. Qxd4 bxc3 $14 ) 16. e5 ( 16. Bxf6 $5 ) 16... dxe5 17. Nf3 $1 ( 17. fxe5 Nd5 $1 18. Nde2 ( 18. Nf5 Bxf5 19. Nxd5 c3 $1 ) ( 18. Nxd5 Rxd5 $13 ) 18... Nb6 ) ( 17. Rxe5 Rc8 ) 17... exf4 18. Ne5 ( 18. Bxf6 Bxf6 19. Qxd7 Qa5 20. Rd5 ( 20. Nd4 $2 Rd8 ) ( 20. Ne4 $2 Bxb2+ ) ( 20. Rxe7 $5 ) 20... Rxd5 21. Nxd5 Rd8 22. Nxf6+ ) 18... Qb6 ( 18... Qa5 19. Bxf6 Bxf6 20. Nxd7 Bxc3 21. Qxc3 Qxa2 22. Qa3 { 1-0 Ioseliani-Shafranska,Tbilisi 1987 } ) ( 18... Rxe5 19. Rxe5 Qb6 ) 19. Bxf6 $18 Rb8 20. Qxd7 { Golubev,1989 } 1-0
[Event "Corr. Ukraine"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1990.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Kovalchuk, N."]
[Black "Bashtovoi, G."]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1990.??.??"]
[PlyCount "66"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. Bc4 Bd7 10. h4 Rc8 11. Bb3 h5 12. O-O-O Ne5 13. Bg5 Rc5 14. Kb1 b5 15. g4 hxg4 $5 16. h5 Nxh5 17. Nd5 Re8 18. Rxh5 gxh5 19. Qh2 Rxd5 20. Bxd5 Qb6 21. Nf5 ( 21. Qxh5 $5 e6 22. Bb3 Ng6 ) 21... Bxf5 22. exf5 gxf3 $1 23. Qxh5 Qf2 24. Bf4 Rc8 25. c3 ( 25. Rc1 $3 $18 { Z.Markovic-M.Markovic,1993 } ) 25... Rc5 26. Be6 Qe2 27. Rd4 Qf1+ 28. Kc2 Qg2+ 29. Kb3 Qg4 30. Bxf7+ Kf8 31. Bxe5 Qxh5 32. Bxh5 Rxe5 33. Rf4 Bh6 1/2-1/2
[Event "Corr."]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1991.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Golovenchenko, P.E.."]
[Black "Kurotjka, A.P."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "D44"]
[EventDate "1991.??.??"]
[PlyCount "61"]

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6 5. Bg5 dxc4 6. e4 b5 7. e5 h6 8. Bh4 g5 9. Nxg5 hxg5 10. Bxg5 Nbd7 11. exf6 Bb7 12. g3 c5 13. d5 Qb6 14. Bg2 O-O-O 15. O-O b4 16. Na4 Qb5 17. a3 exd5 ( 17... Nb8 18. axb4 cxb4 19. Qg4 $5 ( 19. Qd4 Nc6 20. dxc6 ) 19... Bxd5 ( 19... Rxd5 20. Rfc1 $16 ) 20. Rfc1 Nc6 ( 20... Nd7 21. Qf4 ( 21. Bxd5 exd5 22. Be3 Bd6 $1 $132 ) ) 21. Bxd5 Rxd5 22. Rxc4 Kd7 ( 22... Rxg5 23. Qd4 $16 ) ( 22... Kb7 23. Rac1 Rxg5 24. Qe4 $16 ) 23. Rac1 Rxg5 24. Qe4 Nd8 25. Qa8 Qa6 ( 25... Ke8 26. Rc8 Rd5 27. Qxa7 Rh6 ( 27... Rhh5 28. Nb6 $18 { Maksimenko-Scherbakov,Aalborg 1993 } ) 28. Nb6 Rd2 29. Na8 $18 { Vl.Lazarev-Dgebuadze,Werfen 1993 } ) 26. Rc7+ Ke8 27. Rd1 Bd6 28. Rc8 Kd7 29. Qb8 Rd5 30. Nc5+ Rxc5 31. Rxc5 Qb6 32. Qc8+ Ke8 33. Rb5 Qc7 34. Qa6 Bc5 35. Qa4 Bxf2+ 36. Kf1 Qc4+ 37. Kxf2 $18 { Golubev/Vl.Lazarev, Biel (Analyse) 1992 } ) ( 17... Ne5 18. axb4 $1 ( 18. Qe2 $5 Nd3 $2 19. axb4 cxb4 20. dxe6 Bxg2 ( 20... Qxg5 21. e7 ) 21. e7 Bxf1 ( 21... Bxe7 22. fxe7 Bxf1 23. exd8=Q+ Rxd8 24. Qg4+ f5 25. Qf3 ) ( 21... Qxg5 22. e8=Q $1 ) 22. Qg4+ Kc7 23. Nc3 $18 { Golubev } ) 18... cxb4 19. Qd4 Nc6 20. dxc6 Rxd4 21. cxb7+ Kc7 22. Be3 e5 23. Nc3 bxc3 24. bxc3 Bc5 25. cxd4 Bxd4 26. Rfb1 Qc5 27. Ra6 Rb8 28. Bc1 $3 { Kamsky-Kramnik,New York m-1,1994 } ) 18. axb4 cxb4 19. Be3 Nc5 20. Qg4+ Rd7 21. Nxc5 ( 21. Bxc5 Bxc5 22. Qg7 Rhd8 23. Nxc5 Qxc5 24. Bh3 Kc7 ( 24... d4 $5 ) 25. Bxd7 Rxd7 $132 { Ivanchuk-"64",1996 } ) 21... Bxc5 22. Qg7 ( 22. Bxc5 Qxc5 $13 { Shirov /  Ivanchuk ,"NEW IN CHESS-YB" (1996) } 23. Qg7 ( 23. Bh3 Rd8 24. Qg7 Kc7 25. Bxd7 Rxd7 $44 { Chess Base } ) 23... Rdd8 24. Qxf7 $14 Qb6 25. Rad1 Rdf8 26. Qg6 Rxf6 27. Qg4+ Kb8 28. Bxd5 Rhf8 29. Bxb7 Rxf2 30. Rd8+ Rxd8 31. Rxf2 Qxb7 32. Qxc4 Rd1+ { 0,5-0,5 Mulder,B-Scholz,F 1987cr } ) 22... Rhd8 ( 22... Rdd8 23. Qxf7 Kb8 24. Bxc5 Qxc5 25. Rfe1 Qf8 26. Qg7 Qxg7 27. fxg7 Rhe8 28. h4 Rxe1+ 29. Rxe1 d4 30. h5 d3 31. h6 d2 32. Rb1 { 1-0 Embrey,K-Ugge,A ,1995 cr } ) 23. Bh3 $5 d4 ( 23... Bxe3 24. fxe3 d4 25. Qxf7 dxe3 ( 25... Qc6 26. Bxd7+ Rxd7 27. Qe8+ Kc7 28. e4 $18 ) 26. Bxd7+ Rxd7 27. Qe8+ Kc7 28. Rad1 $1 $18 { Golovenchenko } ) ( 23... Kc7 $5 { Golubev } ) 24. Bf4 Qc6 ( 24... Bd5 $14 { Fritz5 } ) 25. f3 d3+ 26. Kg2 Qd5 ( 26... c3 27. bxc3 bxc3 28. Qxf7 d2 29. Qb3 $5 { Golubev } 29... Qxf6 30. Qc4 Qc6 ( 30... Qd4 31. Qxd4 Bxd4 32. Ra4 ) 31. Qxc3 ) 27. Ra5 Bc6 $2 ( 27... c3 28. bxc3 bxc3 29. Bxd7+ $1 { Golubev } ( 29. Be3 Bxe3 $1 30. Rxd5 Bxd5 31. Bxd7+ Rxd7 $44 { Golovenchenko } ) ( 29. Rxc5+ Qxc5 30. Qxf7 { Qb3 Golovenchenko } ) 29... Rxd7 ( 29... Kxd7 $18 30. Rxc5 ( 30. Qg4+ Kc6 31. Be3 Bxe3 32. Rxd5 Rxd5 33. Qc4+ ) 30... Qxc5 31. Qxf7+ Kc8 32. Qe6+ Rd7 33. f7 ) 30. Qg8+ Rd8 31. Qg4+ Rd7 32. Re1 Qxf3+ 33. Qxf3 Bxf3+ 34. Kxf3 $18 ) 28. Rxc5 $1 ( 28. Be3 Bxe3 ) 28... Qxc5 29. Qxf7 Qd4 ( 29... c3 30. bxc3 bxc3 31. Qb3 $1 $40 { Golovenchenko } ) 30. Bxd7+ Bxd7 31. Rc1 $1 $18 ( 31. Rc1 c3 32. bxc3 bxc3 33. Qb3 ) ( 31. Rc1 Qxb2+ 32. Kh1 c3 33. Qc4+ ) 1-0
[Event "Simferopol ch-UKR"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1992.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ginsburg, G."]
[Black "Ovseevich, S."]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "B79"]
[EventDate "1992.??.??"]
[PlyCount "47"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Bc4 Nc6 9. Qd2 Bd7 10. Bb3 Qa5 11. g4 Ne5 12. O-O-O Rfc8 ( 12... b5 $5 13. Bh6 Nc4 14. Bxc4 Bxh6 15. Qxh6 bxc4 16. h4 Rab8 $1 { Ginzburg-Ovseevich,Nikolaev zt 1993 } ) 13. h4 b5 ( 13... Nc4 ) ( 13... Rc4 ) 14. h5 b4 $5 ( 14... Nc4 15. Bxc4 bxc4 16. Bh6 $1 Bh8 17. Nf5 $1 { -"CORRESPONDENCE CHESS INFORMATOR"8 (1995) ,page 210 } ) 15. Nce2 ( 15. Nd5 $5 Nxd5 16. Bxd5 ) 15... Nc4 16. Bxc4 ( 16. Qd3 Nxe3 $5 ( 16... Ne5 ) 17. Qxe3 Qc5 ) 16... Rxc4 17. Kb1 Rac8 18. hxg6 fxg6 $13 19. Bh6 ( 19. Ng3 $1 $16 { "CORRESPONDENCE CHESS INFORMATOR"3 (1993) , page 107 } ) 19... Bh8 20. Bg5 Qe5 $1 21. Bf4 Qc5 22. Bg5 ( 22. b3 Rc3 23. Nxc3 bxc3 24. Qh2 e5 25. Bg5 exd4 26. Bxf6 h5 27. Bg5 Qxg5 28. Qxd6 Qc5 $5 ) 22... Qe5 23. Bf4 Qa5 24. Bg5 { Golubev,M } 1/2-1/2
[Event "Simferopol ch-UKR"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1992.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Golubev, M."]
[Black "Borodai, S."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "C50"]
[EventDate "1992.??.??"]
[PlyCount "85"]

1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nc6 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 Be7 5. d4 Bg4 6. h3 Bxf3 ( 6... Bh5 $5 ) 7. Qxf3 Bf6 8. d5 Nb8 9. Be3 Nd7 10. O-O-O a6 11. g3 Bg5 12. h4 Bxe3+ 13. Qxe3 Ngf6 14. Be2 b5 15. g4 Nc5 16. a3 Qb8 17. g5 Ng8 18. b4 Nd7 19. h5 Ne7 20. Bg4 Nb6 21. g6 fxg6 22. hxg6 h6 23. Be2 Nc4 24. Bxc4 bxc4 25. f4 a5 26. b5 exf4 27. Qxf4 Rf8 28. Qg4 Qc8 29. Qh5 Rf4 30. Rhg1 Ng8 31. Qe2 Qh3 32. Qxc4 Qe3+ 33. Kb2 O-O-O 34. Rgf1 Rxf1 35. Rxf1 Nf6 36. e5 dxe5 37. Rxf6 gxf6 38. d6 Rd7 39. Nd5 Qg1 40. Ne7+ Kb8 41. Qg8+ Kb7 42. Qc8+ Kb6 43. Qb8+ 1-0
[Event "Simferopol ch-UKR"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1992.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Golubev, M."]
[Black "Izhnin, A."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "B47"]
[EventDate "1992.??.??"]
[PlyCount "71"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Qc7 6. g3 d6 7. Bg2 a6 8. O-O Bd7 9. Be3 Nf6 10. Qe2 Be7 11. a4 O-O 12. f4 Na5 13. Rad1 Nc4 14. Bc1 e5 15. Nf5 Bxf5 16. exf5 Nxb2 17. Bxb2 Qb6+ 18. Kh1 Qxb2 19. Rd3 Qb4 20. Rb1 Qc5 21. Rxb7 Ra7 22. Rxa7 Qxa7 23. g4 $44 exf4 24. g5 Ne8 $8 25. f6 $6 ( 25. h4 $44 ) 25... gxf6 $1 26. Bc6 Qc5 $15 27. Bd5 $2 ( 27. Bxe8 Rxe8 28. gxf6 Qc6+ 29. Nd5 Bf8 30. Qg2+ Kh8 31. Ne7 Qxg2+ 32. Kxg2 ) 27... Bd8 28. Ne4 Qa5 29. c3 fxg5 30. Qh5 Ng7 31. Qh6 $17 Re8 $4 { T } 32. Bxf7+ Kxf7 33. Nxd6+ Kg8 34. Nxe8 Nxe8 35. Qe6+ Kf8 36. Rd7 { Golubev } 1-0
[Event "Simferopol ch-UKR"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1992.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Smuter, L."]
[Black "Ovseevich, S."]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev"]
[ECO "B76"]
[EventDate "1992.??.??"]
[PlyCount "80"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. g4 e5 10. Nde2 Be6 11. O-O-O Qa5 12. Kb1 ( 12. g5 Nh5 13. Qxd6 Rfd8 14. Qc5 Rxd1+ 15. Kxd1 Qd8+ $1 16. Nd5 ( 16. Kc1 Nd4 17. Bg2 b6 ) 16... Bf8 17. Qc4 Nb4 18. Nc3 Rc8 19. Qb3 Rxc3 $1 ) 12... Rfc8 13. g5 Nd7 14. Nd5 Qd8 15. h4 Nb6 16. Nxb6 axb6 17. Nc1 b5 18. Bxb5 Nd4 19. Bxd4 exd4 20. f4 Rc5 21. Qb4 Qb6 22. a4 Rac8 23. Nd3 Rxc2 24. Rc1 Qc7 25. a5 d5 26. Qb3 Rc3 27. bxc3 dxe4 28. cxd4 Bxb3 29. Rxc7 Rxc7 30. Ne5 Bd5 31. Rc1 Rxc1+ 32. Kxc1 f6 33. gxf6 Bxf6 34. Kd2 Bd8 35. a6 bxa6 36. Bxa6 Bxh4 37. Ke3 Kg7 38. Bc4 Bxc4 39. Nxc4 Bd8 40. Kxe4 h5 1/2-1/2
[Event "Loosdorf op"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1993.??.??"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Csoke, A."]
[Black "Rumpl, E."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Mikhail Golubev 1998"]
[ECO "B78"]
[EventDate "1993.??.??"]
[PlyCount "87"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. Bc4 Bd7 10. O-O-O Rc8 11. Bb3 Ne5 ( 11... Na5 12. Bg5 $5 ( 12. Bh6 $5 ) ) 12. Bg5 Nc4 13. Bxc4 Rxc4 14. e5 Ne8 ( 14... dxe5 $1 ) 15. Nd5 $1 ( 15. exd6 Nxd6 $13 { Csoke-Medvegy,Hungary 1992 } ) ( 15. Qd3 $2 Rc5 { Zeljko-Starcic,Slovenia 1996 } ) 15... f6 ( 15... Rxd4 $2 16. Qxd4 Bxe5 17. Nxe7+ $18 ) 16. exf6 Nxf6 ( 16... exf6 17. Bf4 Nc7 { Schekachev-B.Alterman,Sochi 1990 } 18. Ne3 $1 { G.Kosanovic,1994 } ) 17. Bxf6 $5 ( 17. Qe2 $5 Rc5 18. Ne6 Bxe6 19. Qxe6+ Kh8 20. Bxf6 Bxf6 21. Rhe1 Qc8 ( 21... Rxd5 22. Qxd5 Qb6 23. c3 Rc8 24. Re2 Qa6 25. Rde1 e5 26. f4 exf4 27. Re6 { 1-0 Pikula-Ristic,Yugoslavia 1994 } ) 22. Qxc8 Rfxc8 23. Rd2 { Turzo-Haack,Dresden 1995 } ) ( 17. Nxf6+ $2 { (! Mikhalchishin YB/4) } 17... Rxf6 $1 18. Bxf6 ( 18. b3 Rc5 $1 $13 ( 18... Rxd4 $2 19. Qxd4 Rf5 20. Qxd6 $18 ) ) 18... Bxf6 $44 19. Ne2 ( 19. Nb3 Qc7 20. Kb1 Bf5 21. Rc1 g5 $13 { Golubev,NIC YB/13 } ) ( 19. Qe2 $2 Qc8 ) ( 19. Qe3 Kh8 $44 ( 19... Qb6 20. Qb3 $1 ) ) 19... Be6 $13 ( 19... Kh8 20. g4 $5 Qb6 21. c3 Qa5 22. Kb1 ) ( 19... Qc7 20. g4 ( 20. c3 b5 21. Kb1 b4 22. Rc1 Qa5 23. cxb4 Rxb4 24. Nc3 Be6 25. Ka1 Ra4 26. a3 Rxa3+ 27. bxa3 Qxa3+ 28. Kb1 Bf5+ { 0-1 Torres-Ballesteros,corr 1987 } ) ) 20. c3 ( 20. Kb1 Qb6 21. c3 Ra4 $5 22. b3 Ra3 23. Nd4 Bxd4 24. Qxd4 Qa6 ) ( 20. Qe3 Qc8 $1 21. c3 b5 22. Nd4 Bf7 $13 ) 20... Qa5 21. a3 b5 22. Kb1 b4 $5 23. cxb4 Bf5+ 24. Ka2 Qa6 $44 { (1989) } ) 17... Bxf6 ( 17... Rxf6 18. Qe2 $1 ) 18. Nxf6+ $36 Rxf6 19. Rhe1 ( 19. h4 $5 ) 19... e5 20. Ne2 Rc6 ( 20... Qc7 21. Nc3 Bc6 22. Re3 Rd4 23. Rd3 Rxd3 24. Qxd3 Kg7 25. b3 Qb6 { -  Csoke-Velvart,Budapest 1994 } ) 21. Nc3 Rf7 22. Kb1 Qb6 23. Re3 Be6 24. Rd3 Bc4 25. Rxd6 Rxd6 26. Qxd6 Qxd6 27. Rxd6 g5 28. Ne4 g4 29. Nf6+ Kg7 30. Nxg4 e4 31. b3 exf3 32. gxf3 Be2 33. Ne5 Rf5 34. Rd7+ Kf6 35. Ng4+ Kg5 36. Rxh7 Bxf3 37. Nf2 Kf4 38. Nd3+ Ke3 39. Re7+ Kd2 40. Kb2 Rb5 41. Ne5 Bh1 42. Nc4+ Kd1 43. Ne3+ Ke2 44. Nf5+ { Golubev,1998 } 1-0
[Event "Ukraine Ch"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1995.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Krivosheja, S."]
[Black "Feigin, M."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Sergei Krivosheja for Chess Sector"]
[ECO "D45"]
[EventDate "1995.??.??"]
[PlyCount "37"]

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. Nf3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 h6 8. Bd2 e5 { ?! } ( 8... Qe7 { - 63/(382) } ) 9. cxd5 { N } ( 9. dxe5 ) 9... cxd5 { ?! } ( 9... Nxd5 { Hazai,L; Lukacs,P } ) 10. Nb5 Bb8 $8 11. Bb4 Nxg4 ( 11... e4 12. Rc1 ) 12. h3 e4 ( 12... Ngf6 13. Rc1 Nb6 14. dxe5 $16 ( 14. Nxe5 $16 ) ) 13. hxg4 exf3 14. Rh5 { !! } 14... g5 ( 14... Nb6 15. Re5+ Bxe5 16. dxe5 $18 { 'with the idea' 17.Nd6, 17.Nc7 } ) ( 14... Nf6 15. Re5+ $18 { ! } ) 15. Rc1 Nb6 16. Qc5 { 'with the idea' Rh6 } 16... Be6 ( 16... Qf6 17. Nxa7 { ! } 17... Bxa7 18. Rxh6 { ! } 18... Rxh6 19. Bb5+ Bd7 20. Qf8# { # } ) 17. Rxh6 Rxh6 ( 17... Rg8 18. Qc2 { 'with the idea' 19.Qh7 Kd7 20.Re6 Ke6 21.Qf5# } ) 18. Nc7+ { ! } 18... Qxc7 19. Bb5+ 1-0