Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 645 million , $ 488 million and $ 338 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2013 , are as follows ( in millions ) : other commitments as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , which consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . v . samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics co. , ltd and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . on march 1 , 2013 , the district court upheld $ 599 million of the jury 2019s award and ordered a new trial as to the remainder . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment , partial re-trial and appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its results of operations . virnetx , inc . v . apple inc . et al . on august 11 , 2010 , virnetx , inc . filed an action against the company alleging that certain of its products infringed on four patents relating to network communications technology . on november 6 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict against the company , and awarded damages of $ 368 million . the company is challenging the verdict , believes it has valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time. .
|2014|$ 610|
|2015|613|
|2016|587|
|2017|551|
|2018|505|
|thereafter|1855|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 4721|
.
Question: why is the information relative to 2012 costs incorrect and what would the correct information be?


Answer: The answer is:856.0