Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis supplemental financial information and disclosures income tax matters effective tax rate from continuing operations .
||2017|2016|2015|
|u.s . gaap|40.1% ( 40.1 % )|30.8% ( 30.8 % )|25.9% ( 25.9 % )|
|adjusted effective income taxrate 2014non-gaap1|30.8% ( 30.8 % )|31.6% ( 31.6 % )|32.3% ( 32.3 % )|
adjusted effective income tax rate 2014 non-gaap1 30.8% ( 30.8 % ) 31.6% ( 31.6 % ) 32.3% ( 32.3 % ) 1 . beginning in 2017 , income tax consequences associated with employee share-based awards are recognized in provision for income taxes in the income statements but are excluded from the intermittent net discrete tax provisions ( benefits ) adjustment as we anticipate conversion activity each year . see note 2 to the financial statements on the adoption of the accounting update improvements to employee share-based payment accounting . for 2015 , adjusted effective income tax rate also excludes dva . for further information on non-gaap measures , see 201cselected non-gaap financial information 201d herein . the effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2017 included an intermittent net discrete tax provision of $ 968 million , primarily related to the impact of the tax act , partially offset by net discrete tax benefits primarily associ- ated with the remeasurement of reserves and related interest due to new information regarding the status of multi-year irs tax examinations . the tax act , enacted on december 22 , 2017 , significantly revised u.s . corporate income tax law by , among other things , reducing the corporate income tax rate to 21% ( 21 % ) , and implementing a modified territorial tax system that includes a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries ; imposes a minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income ( 201cgilti 201d ) and an alternative base erosion and anti-abuse tax ( 201cbeat 201d ) on u.s . corpora- tions that make deductible payments to non-u.s . related persons in excess of specified amounts ; and broadens the tax base by partially or wholly eliminating tax deductions for certain historically deductible expenses ( e.g. , fdic premiums and executive compensation ) . we recorded an approximate $ 1.2 billion net discrete tax provision as a result of the enactment of the tax act , primarily from the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets using the lower enacted corporate tax rate . this provi- sion incorporates the best available information as of the enactment date as well as assumptions made based upon our current interpretation of the tax act . our estimates may change as we receive additional clarification and implementa- tion guidance from the u.s . treasury department and as the interpretation of the tax act evolves over time . the ultimate impact of the income tax effects of the tax act will be deter- mined in connection with the preparation of our u.s . consoli- dated federal income tax return . taking into account our current assumptions , estimates and interpretations related to the tax act and other factors , we expect our effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2018 to be approximately 22% ( 22 % ) to 25% ( 25 % ) , depending on factors such as the geographic mix of earnings and employee share- based awards ( see 201cforward-looking statements 201d ) . subsequent to the release of the firm 2019s 2017 earnings on january 18 , 2018 , certain estimates related to the net discrete tax provision associated with the enactment of the tax act were revised , resulting in a $ 43 million increase in the provi- sion for income taxes and a reallocation of impacts among segments . this decreased diluted eps and diluted eps from continuing operations by $ 0.03 and $ 0.02 in the fourth quarter and year ended december 31 , 2017 , respectively . on a business segment basis , the change resulted in an $ 89 million increase in provision for income taxes for wealth management , a $ 45 million decrease for institutional securi- ties , and a $ 1 million decrease for investment management . the effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2016 included intermittent net discrete tax benefits of $ 68 million , primarily related to the remeasurement of reserves and related interest due to new information regarding the status of multi- year irs tax examinations , partially offset by adjustments for other tax matters . the effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2015 included intermittent net discrete tax benefits of $ 564 million , primarily associated with the repatriation of non-u.s . earn- ings at a cost lower than originally estimated due to an internal restructuring to simplify the legal entity organization in the u.k . u.s . bank subsidiaries we provide loans to a variety of customers , from large corpo- rate and institutional clients to high net worth individuals , primarily through our u.s . bank subsidiaries , morgan stanley bank n.a . ( 201cmsbna 201d ) and morgan stanley private bank , national association ( 201cmspbna 201d ) ( collectively , 201cu.s . bank subsidiaries 201d ) . the lending activities in the institutional securities business segment primarily include loans and lending commitments to corporate clients . the lending activ- ities in the wealth management business segment primarily include securities-based lending that allows clients to borrow december 2017 form 10-k 52 .
Question: what is the difference between u.s . gaap and adjusted effective income tax rate 2014non-gaap in 2015?


Answer: The answer is:-6.4