You are given a text that consists of multiple sentences. Your task is to perform abstractive summarization on this text. Use your understanding of the content to express the main ideas and crucial details in a shorter, coherent, and natural sounding text.

BALTIMORE, Oct. 14, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Derrick Johnson, president and CEO of the NAACP, issued the following statement today in opposition to the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to serve as Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States: "Today, the NAACP submitteda letter to the Senate Judiciary Committeestrongly opposing the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. Coming in the middle of a presidential election in which over seven million people have already voted, the Barrett nomination is as illegitimate as it is corrupt. Instead of forcing a nomination onto our highest court, the Senate should address the harms of the global pandemic raging across the country and disproportionately affecting the lives and livelihoods of African Americans. Under the "advice and consent" clause of the Constitution, the Senate must rigorously and meticulously scrutinize a Supreme Court nomination. Weeks and even months are necessary to fulfill this solemn duty. The Senate's timetable here is designed to fail. Fast-tracking this nominationeven as individual Senators have contracted coronaviruswill deprive the American people of the public, exacting review that should be afforded to a lifetime appointment to the Court. The next president should decide who sits on the Court. We have reviewed Amy Coney Barrett's record on civil rights, including her writings as a law professor and her three years as an appellate court judge. On issue after issue, we have found her to be stunningly hostile to civil rights. Her aggressive view of when past decisions should be overruled, combined with her reactionary positions on what rights the Constitution protects, will jeopardize our hard-fought wins in the Court. Her scholarship questions even foundational principles such as whether the Fourteenth Amendment was properly adopted and whetherBrown v. Board of Educationremains viable authority. Her repeated endorsement of discrimination in the workplaceincluding the stunning conclusions that separate can be equal when it comes to race and that the use of racial epithets does not necessarily create a hostile work environmentmark a clear willingness to jettison longstanding civil rights precedents. Sometimes it is difficult to discern the consequences of a confirmation from a nominee's past writings and rulings, but not with Judge Barrett. And the stakes could not be higher. The rights of African Americans to fully participate in democracy and in every facet of social and economic life, on an equal basis, lie in the balance. The NAACP has fought to protect the Supreme Court since 1930, when we helped to defeat a Herbert Hoover nominee to the Supreme Court. We will fight this illegitimate Trump nomination with everything we have because of the danger it poses to our civil rights and to the future of our democracy. At the same time, we emphatically encourage all Americans to vote. As the Supreme Court battle demonstrates, the consequences of this election could not be greater. Our voices must be heard." NOTE: The Legal Defense Fund also referred to as the NAACP-LDF was founded in 1940 as a part of the NAACP, but separated in 1957 to become a completely separate entity. It is recognized as the nation's first civil and human rights law organization, and shares our commitment to equal rights. SOURCE NAACP Empowerment Programs, Inc.

Answer: NAACP Opposes Nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court As Illegitimate and Grave Threat to Civil Rights