Model: research-dump/bge-base-en-v1.5_wikipedia_r_masked_wikipedia_r_masked
Author: research-dump
Pipeline: text-classification
Library: setfit
Tags: setfit, safetensors, bert, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer, arxiv:2209.11055, base_model:BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, base_model:finetune:BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
Card metadata: tags: setfit, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer
widget: St. Timothy High School (Cochrane): Luna <3 (She/Her) ( talk ) 04:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC) This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions . Luna <3 (She/Her) ( talk ) 04:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC) This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , and Christianity . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC) High schools are usually the subject of enough verifiable and reliable published sources to pass WP:GNG . After a quick search I found coverage in the Calgary Herald and another article about their new principal and added them to the article. I suspect there are more sources out there to develop the article. –– Formal Dude (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] per nom. I haven't been able to find anything that would satisfy WP:NSCHOOL . The notion that high schools are generally notable was discarded quite a while back. Clarityfiend ( talk ) 22:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] to Calgary Catholic School District . I have spent some time searching for sources, but nothing significant at this stage. It could just be WP:TOOSOON - the school is quite new, although it is heading for its 20th anniversary. All the same, it is not very large, and doesn't appear to be independently notable. Per Clarityfiend, secondary schools are no longer presumed notable, and that is a consensus view from an RfC. However, neither did FormalDude say that they were - merely that such schools are usually the subject of sufficient coverage in sources to pass GNG. This is true, but at this point I do not see that for this case. The Calgary Herald articles have limited distribution, and an article about appointment of staff at what is essentially a local school is not sufficient in itself to establish notability. I do feel, however, that a is a suitable alternative to deletion in this case. Redirects are WP:CHEAP , and searching on the name of the school with the place (per the title) is a plausible search term - particularly by people in the locality. Information on this page is almost entirely on the target page, and that would be a suitable landing page for anyone conducting the search. I do not see that deletion prior to is required - thus page history would be preserved should more sources come to light in the future, such that this could be expanded into an encylopaedic artice. As it may just be TOOSOON, it is entirely possible that such an article could be written one day. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 14:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] per Sirfurboy. IMO this is a better way of organizing schools coverage in general, if only because it affords a much less inviting target for the various kinds of abuse that school articles are traditionally subjected to. At any rate it seems like a substantially better approach here, where there really doesn't seem to be sourcing currently available that could support more than a permastub. It can always be spun back out later if sufficient source material is located. -- Visviva ( talk ) 03:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC) Not going to ! vote for obvious COI reasons, but I would support a per Sirfurboy and Visviva . Luna <3 (She/Her) ( talk ) 05:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page., Erum Ali : Has styled her husband in some movies and was the lead costume designer in one movie. All her notability is inherited from her husband and fails WP:GNG Jupitus Smart 15:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC) This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Fashion , India , and New Zealand . Jupitus Smart 15:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] to Abbas (actor) . Not too concerned whether or not she got her start in films due to nepotism; that's hallowed tradition in film-industries worldwide :). But I agree with the nominator that the subject fails WP:GNG at present. The two main sources cited are an interview with the subject and a short, soft-focused piece of the type that is typically written and distributed by publicists to accompany a film opening. A web search didn't find anything more substantial that would be needed to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE . Since the subject and her career as a fashion designer are already mentioned in Abbas (actor)#Personal life , a would be justified and should suffice for now. Abecedare ( talk ) 15:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC) This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Tamil Nadu . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC) 10, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fails GNG but a to her husband is appropriate as her work is mentioned there. Schwede 66 19:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] to Abbas (actor) . BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Notability is not inherited. // Timothy :: talk 01:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page., Simon Sues : – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC) This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Comics and animation , and Anime and manga . – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] issues not addressed for 8 years; Google only throws up listings and associated official and/or fan social media accounts, meaning notable neutral sources are unlikely to be found, at most to Tokyopop as seemingly only notable attached page. BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 16:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] . It's ok to mass prod such unreferenced fancruft. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 16:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mass prod was my mistake, I forgot no-one could see that I'd checked to see if anything was salvageable beforehand and put through too many at once. I have been put gently right by some kind people, and hopefully will not have to do anything with that many pages at once again! =) BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 20:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] . ZERO sources used, I'm not wading through every Google mention with a person named Simon that sues people. TNT this article. Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strongly agree with what’s been said above. This is a clear . Go4thProsper ( talk ) 08:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] - literally unsourced and difficult to find anything. Bearian ( talk ) 19:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) GNG . Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page., Selfie Type: Never launched. See WP:CRYSTALBALL . Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC) This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Software . Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC) coverage by BBC and others establishes notability. Whether it was launched or not is irrelevant. We have many articles for products and projects that never came to fruition, and there's no policy to remove such articles. WP:CRYSTALBALL doesn't apply, as this isn't a prediction, it's a description of a past event or idea, which still exists as a notable idea. Owen× ☎ 15:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] into Virtual keyboard - changed per discussion below with nom. More than enough sources to support this as a section in the target. Owen× ☎ 18:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC) CRYSTALBALL , I meant that it is very unlikely that there will be more info about this particular product from Samsung in the near future, I just mentioned crystal ball because it is a nice idea to have "an invisible keyboard", but since this particular product didn't launch, we can't predict that there will be another product implementing this idea, thus I think it shouldn't have a standalone article. Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, coverage by BBC and others establishes notability . Since the only coverage is about announcement, I believe it is not enough for notability: a burst of coverage (often around product announcements) does not automatically make a product notable per WP:NSOFT . Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand your point, and agree that such a burst of coverage does not automatically establish notability, and you are correct that we are unlikely to get additional sources about this concept. My claim is that when you take BBC along with all the other sources, this concept of a product marginally passes our usual threshold of notability. That said, in an effort to drive to a consensus here, how would you feel about merging this article to Virtual keyboard ? We certainly have more than enough sources here for a section in the target page. Owen× ☎ 17:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ OwenX , I think it's a good idea. I noticed that there is a section "Optical virtual keyboard" which is exactly what Selfie Type was about. Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Excellent. I changed my ! vote above. If you revise the nomination, we can speedy close this AfD as withdrawn and carry out the as agreed. Owen× ☎ 18:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page., Viverse: Taking it here to see if there is consensus to it a . – Joe ( talk ) 03:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC) This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions . – Joe ( talk ) 03:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There has been quite a bit of in-depth coverage in major publications like ZDNet, VentureBeat, and by Forbes staff writers since the last . It has become notable at this point so is a even if it is a passing fad, as per WP:DEGRADE . Chagropango ( talk ) 18:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment "A might have been a viable option even 2 years ago, but considering that this platform is owned by HTC Corporation, which is striving to build something on the level of the Facebook's Meta, and has garnered media attention in recent months (Probably also in Chinese from the Taiwan media), I'm more inclined to retain and enhance the page." I’d rather ask the editors from Taiwan or those competent in Chinese to double check the media coverage in the manufacturer’s original language as well. -- Onetimememorial ( talk ) 20:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 05:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong . With >20 cites from across five different years , why is this even up for consideration? It's a perfectly valid article with a good structure and lots of room for improvement in future. Last1in ( talk ) 12:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] with HTC Vive . It seems to have made a splash in headlines, but contrary to what Last1in claims, there is not coverage across "five different years", with only one article being written in 2023 and the remainder being written in 2022. I'm unconvinced of any lasting notability. SWinxy ( talk ) 00:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am not convinced of lasting notability, either, but my precognition is acting up . As for sources, were you perhaps looking at retrieval date? Publish date shows five years. 2016: VentureBeat; 2019: VentureBeat; 2021: Frater, Patrick (Variety); 2022: Auganix, James Dargan (MVI), Ochanji Sam (VRTimes), others; and 2023: Grant, Rob (VRTimes), VentureBeat. I was unable to find an actual publication date on a dozen more of them. Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 14:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The 2016 and 2019 VentureBeat articles make no mention of Viverse. One is on an app store and the other is on an app subscription package. SWinxy ( talk ) 20:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] . The platform is a big enough phenomenon that even indirectly related events have gotten the attention of the VR media: [15] , [16] , [17] . Deckkohl ( talk ) 17:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page.
metrics: accuracy
pipeline_tag: text-classification
library_name: setfit
inference: yes
base_model: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 8
Created: 2025-02-07 05:05:00