Model: llm-wizard/legal-ft
Author: llm-wizard
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, bert, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:400, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss, arxiv:1908.10084, arxiv:2205.13147, arxiv:1705.00652, base_model:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l, base_model:finetune:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l, model-index, text-embeddings-inference, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
Card metadata: tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:400, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
widget: source_sentence: What actions did Mr and Mrs Harris take that led to the revelation of the facts in the case?
sentences: Perplexity’s marketing activities include promoting on its Instagram account a massive billboard 
in Times Square from September 2024 which read “Congratulations Perplexity on 250 million 
questions answered last month.”5 
 
4 Discover New York with Perplexity, Perplexity AI (last visited Oct. 17, 2024), 
https://www.perplexity.ai/encyclopedia/discovernewyork. 
5 @perplexity.ai, Instagram (Sept. 4, 2024),  
https://www.instagram.com/perplexity.ai/p/C_g2TonSHC5.  
Case 1:24-cv-07984     Document 1     Filed 10/21/24     Page 8 of 42, 31 
 
status.    It was not until Mr. and Mrs. Harris retained counsel, served a demand letter on May 22, 
2024, met with the then Assistant Superintendent and a lengthy “bulling investigation” that these 
facts came to light.    
The Defendant’s actions and conduct, by definition, was arbitrary and capricious as was 
the  imposition of discipline that was a gross abuse of discretion when it served as a catalyst for 
this action.  Similarly, the Defendants exceeded their authority by repeatedly doubling down on 
their acts and conduct when given the opportunity to reverse course.  The adverse action taken was 
not based on sound, objective, adopted and approved policies and procedures regarding the use of, website users, and licensing is transacted with individuals and entities residing in this State and 
District. As such, the injuries alleged herein from Perplexity’s infringement and other unlawful 
conduct foreseeably occurred in this State and District. In addition, Perplexity or its agents reside 
in this District and may be found in this State and District. 
23. 
Defendant Perplexity is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to N.Y. 
C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(1) and (3) as it has purposefully directed its activities at New York and has 
Case 1:24-cv-07984     Document 1     Filed 10/21/24     Page 7 of 42, source_sentence: How did the Plaintiffs demonstrate that the discipline and sanctions imposed by Hingham were arbitrary and capricious?
sentences: 27 
 
in the adoption and execution of policies and practices that in their judgment are needed to preserve 
internal order and discipline and to maintain institutional security"), such deference is not without 
limitation.  The propriety of and deference afforded to the decision making is a rebuttable 
presumption that may only be undone by a showing that the action taken was arbitrary and 
capricious.  See Doe v. Supt. Of Schools of Stoughton, 437 Mass. 1, 5 (2002).  The Plaintiffs are 
likely to succeed on the merits because they have shown through Hingham’s own investigation 
materials that the discipline and sanctions imposed were arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of 
discretion under the circumstances., 7 
 
highly competitive curriculum with by and large top grades, a 36 ACT (highest score possible) 
and a varied solid resume.  In order for RNH to apply to Stanford by November 1, which means 
submitting no later than October 25th, his transcript issue must be resolved by early October so 
that when RNH requests his transcripts, they reflect grades commensurate with his achievement 
and not marred by the incident that gave rise to this case. 
Letter grades of “C” in this type of admissions environment typically lead to the applicant 
being excluded from consideration.  Additionally, transcripts and information regarding any 
disciplinary infraction, especially one regarding an academic integrity infraction, are a substantial, as one’s own.  Id. at ¶106-107.  During the project, RNH and his classmate did not take someone 
else’s work or ideas and pass them off as their own.  Id. at ¶108.  RNH and his classmate used AI, 
which generates and synthesizes new information, and did not pass off another’s work as their 
own.  Id. at ¶109.  Despite having this information, the Defendants exceeded the authority granted 
to them in an abuse of authority, discretion, and unfettered state action by unfairly and unjustly 
acting as investigator, judge, jury, and executioner in determining the extreme and outrageous 
sanctions imposed upon these Students.  Id. at ¶110.   
After being unfairly and unjustly accused of cheating, plagiarism, and academic, source_sentence: How many students with academic infractions were inducted into the NHS, and what was one of the reasons for their infractions?
sentences: companies that want to utilize popular, high-quality, human-created journalism for use by the 
companies’ AI applications. Revenue received from legitimately-run AI companies supports the 
costs of news gathering. This revenue also establishes that there is a market for the licensing of 
human-generated content for lawful use in AI technologies. 
42. 
Plaintiffs’ content is highly valued in this market.  
 
 
Case 1:24-cv-07984     Document 1     Filed 10/21/24     Page 12 of 42, 18 
 
upon in affirming the decision through an appeal to exclude RNH and his classmate from the NHS.  
Id. at ¶145.  At that time, Defendant Swanson and other Defendants knew or should have known 
that the District inducted at least seven students into NHS, who had academic infractions on their 
record, one of which was because of the prior use of AI.  Id. at ¶146.   
The “committee” that adjudicated selection for NHS this year did not include teachers who 
know and are familiar with RNH and his classmate.  Id. at ¶147.  This is due to the then escalating 
contract conflict with the Hingham Educators Association (“HEA”) where HEA engaged in an, is plainly and solely for a commercial purpose. Moreover, upon information and belief, it copies 
into its index every single word of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works that it can get its hands on. 
Additionally, the use to which it puts these copies is to create a commercial substitute for Plaintiffs’ 
protected works – in Perplexity’s own words, to allow and encourage users to “Skip the Links” to 
Plaintiffs’ original works. Such substitution causes substantial harm to Plaintiffs’ traditional 
advertising and subscription revenues. Perplexity’s conduct also harms Plaintiffs’ additional, 
established revenue stream from licensing to more scrupulous AI companies. Nor is Perplexity’s, source_sentence: How many pages does the document filed in case 1:24-cv-12437-WGY contain?
sentences: Case 1:24-cv-12437-WGY   Document 8   Filed 10/08/24   Page 26 of 42, more specialized in conducting a specific task, responding to prompts specific to a subject area, or 
recognizing nuances in particular questions. 
48. 
Fine-tuning might also ensure that the LLM responds to certain prompts by 
mimicking a certain linguistic style. For example, outputting a cooking recipe requires a distinct 
output style from recounting the statistics of the Allies’ landing at Normandy’s beaches on D-Day, 
or from writing a poem about the summer wind. A medical treatise uses a distinct linguistic style 
from a sports recap. 
Case 1:24-cv-07984     Document 1     Filed 10/21/24     Page 13 of 42, D. The Balancing Of The Irreparable Harm Heavily Favors The Plaintiffs 
The balance of harms in this case clearly favors granting an injunction. If the injunction is 
not granted, RNH will suffer irreparable harm that cannot be adequately remedied by any future 
court decision or monetary compensation. RNH’s academic and professional future is at stake, as 
a delayed resolution of the investigation into academic sanctions could result in missed deadlines 
for college applications, exclusion from consideration at elite universities, and a permanent stain 
on his academic record. The reputational damage and uncertainty caused will undermine RNH’s 
ability to compete fairly with other applicants, affecting not only his immediate educational, source_sentence: What challenges do professional journalists and publishers face that may impact their ability to enforce their intellectual property rights?
sentences: ban or prohibition on the use of AI by students. The Defendants were not trained on any policies 
or procedures for use of AI alone, never mind what they were “able to do” to students who used 
it.    The entire purpose behind having such policies and procedures in place is to ensure notice, 
equity, fairness and to be sure:  a level playing field for all.   Making matters worse, there exists 
no adequate procedures and policies for the induction of an applicant into NHS when compared to 
other members who are inducted despite the same or similar infractions.  This is a denial of student 
rights of the highest order. 
 
In the case here, RNH was disciplined on an ad hoc and on-going basis over more than six, 19 
respect. They feel very good about it. And in our user interface, even though we give the answer, 
we do show the user exactly where the answer is coming from.”16  
68. 
As Srinivas surely knows or should know, academic standards for avoiding 
plagiarism are wholly independent from copyright law.17 Dow Jones and NYP Holdings editors 
and journalists are not graduate students working out of a library or lab, eager to have someone 
acknowledge and utilize their research. They are professional journalists and publishers – working 
under high-pressure deadlines, sometimes in dangerous places – whose livelihoods depend on the 
enforcement and monetization of their intellectual property rights.  
69., example the school committee under Mass. G.L. c. 71, § 37, may punish a student offender without 
a prior rule specifically forbidding the offending conduct; however, surely such authority cannot 
be limitless. Moreover, this court believes that the imposition of a severe penalty without a 
specific promulgated rule might be constitutionally deficient under certain circumstances.   
Id. (emphasis supplied). “What those circumstances are can only be left to the development of the 
case law in the area.”    Id.   There has been no case law developed in the area of school discipline 
Case 1:24-cv-12437-WGY   Document 8   Filed 10/08/24   Page 28 of 42
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: cosine_accuracy@1, cosine_accuracy@3, cosine_accuracy@5, cosine_accuracy@10, cosine_precision@1, cosine_precision@3, cosine_precision@5, cosine_precision@10, cosine_recall@1, cosine_recall@3, cosine_recall@5, cosine_recall@10, cosine_ndcg@10, cosine_mrr@10, cosine_map@100
model-index: name: SentenceTransformer based on Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
results: task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: Unknown
type: unknown
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.7291666666666666
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.8541666666666666
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.9375
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 1
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.7291666666666666
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.28472222222222215
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.1875
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.09999999999999999
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.7291666666666666
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.8541666666666666
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.9375
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 1
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.8575788154610162
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.8125248015873017
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.8125248015873016
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 63
Created: 2025-02-10 23:49:46