Model: IoannisKat1/multilingual-e5-large-new
Author: IoannisKat1
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, xlm-roberta, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, dense, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:82, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss, en, arxiv:1908.10084, arxiv:2205.13147, arxiv:1705.00652, base_model:intfloat/multilingual-e5-large, base_model:finetune:intfloat/multilingual-e5-large, license:apache-2.0, model-index, text-embeddings-inference, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: intfloat/multilingual-e5-large
Card metadata: language: en
license: apache-2.0
tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, dense, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:82, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: intfloat/multilingual-e5-large
widget: source_sentence: When did the victims give away credentials?
sentences: According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit actually materialize;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another; and

c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person who suffered the damage be the same individual.

The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.

The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim possesses an active claim for restitution.

The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant., Voice phishing involves manipulating victims over the phone. Attackers pose as bank officials or authorities and use intimidation to extract financial details.

Scenario:
- Victims are coerced into giving away PINs, passwords, or other credentials under false pretenses of legal or financial emergencies., According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, without requiring that the benefit actually materialize;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and performs an act, omission, or acquiescence; and

c) Damage to another’s property, according to civil law, which must be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts or omissions. It is not required that the deceived person and the person who suffered the loss be the same.

The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts relating to the present or the past, in such a way as to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present situation fabricated by the perpetrator—who has already made the decision not to fulfill their obligation—then the crime of fraud is established.

The term “property” denotes the totality of a person’s economic assets possessing monetary value, while damage to property refers to its reduction—specifically, the difference between the property’s monetary value before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and its value afterward. Property damage exists even if the victim has an active claim for its restitution.

The time of commission of fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed the deceptive conduct, that is, when they made the false representations which deceived the victim or a third party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss occurred—thus completing the fraud—or the time when the harmful act or omission of the deceived person took place, is irrelevant.

The reference to multiple modes of commission of fraud (i.e., both the misrepresentation of false facts and the concealment of true ones) may create ambiguity and contradiction, unless it is made clear from the overall findings that the offense was committed in one particular manner, and that the reference to the other merely serves to define the intent (mens rea) of the perpetrator—specifically, that the representations were false.

Furthermore, a conviction must contain the specific and well-reasoned justification required by Articles 93 paragraph 3 of the Constitution and 139 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The absence of such reasoning constitutes grounds for cassation (appeal) under Article 510 paragraph 1(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when the judgment does not set out, with clarity, completeness, and consistency, the factual circumstances established by the evidence, upon which the court based its findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the offense, the evidence supporting those findings, and the legal reasoning through which those facts were subsumed under the applicable substantive criminal provision.

For the existence of such reasoning, the explanatory and operative parts of the decision may complement each other, as they form a single, unified whole.

The existence of intent (dolus) does not generally need to be specially justified, since it is inherent in the will to bring about the factual circumstances constituting the objective elements of the offense, and it is presumed from their realization in each particular case—unless the law requires additional elements for criminal liability, such as the act being committed with knowledge of a specific circumstance (direct intent) or with the pursuit of a further purpose, i.e., the achievement of an additional result (offenses requiring a special subjective element).

Furthermore, under Article 510 paragraph 1(e) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a misapplication of substantive criminal law also constitutes grounds for cassation. Such misapplication occurs when the trial court incorrectly applies the law to the facts it has found to be true, or when the violation occurs indirectly, namely when the reasoning of the judgment—comprising the combination of its factual and operative parts and relating to the elements and identity of the offense—contains ambiguities, contradictions, or logical gaps, rendering it impossible to verify, on appeal, whether the law was applied correctly. In such cases, the judgment lacks a lawful basis., source_sentence: What must be the outcome of the deception in relation to property damage?
sentences: According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, without requiring that the benefit actually materialize;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and performs an act, omission, or acquiescence; and

c) Damage to another’s property, according to civil law, which must be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts or omissions. It is not required that the deceived person and the person who suffered the loss be the same.

The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts relating to the present or the past, in such a way as to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present situation fabricated by the perpetrator—who has already made the decision not to fulfill their obligation—then the crime of fraud is established.

The term “property” denotes the totality of a person’s economic assets possessing monetary value, while damage to property refers to its reduction—specifically, the difference between the property’s monetary value before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and its value afterward. Property damage exists even if the victim has an active claim for its restitution.

The time of commission of fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed the deceptive conduct, that is, when they made the false representations which deceived the victim or a third party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss occurred—thus completing the fraud—or the time when the harmful act or omission of the deceived person took place, is irrelevant.

The reference to multiple modes of commission of fraud (i.e., both the misrepresentation of false facts and the concealment of true ones) may create ambiguity and contradiction, unless it is made clear from the overall findings that the offense was committed in one particular manner, and that the reference to the other merely serves to define the intent (mens rea) of the perpetrator—specifically, that the representations were false.

Furthermore, a conviction must contain the specific and well-reasoned justification required by Articles 93 paragraph 3 of the Constitution and 139 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The absence of such reasoning constitutes grounds for cassation (appeal) under Article 510 paragraph 1(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when the judgment does not set out, with clarity, completeness, and consistency, the factual circumstances established by the evidence, upon which the court based its findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the offense, the evidence supporting those findings, and the legal reasoning through which those facts were subsumed under the applicable substantive criminal provision.

For the existence of such reasoning, the explanatory and operative parts of the decision may complement each other, as they form a single, unified whole.

The existence of intent (dolus) does not generally need to be specially justified, since it is inherent in the will to bring about the factual circumstances constituting the objective elements of the offense, and it is presumed from their realization in each particular case—unless the law requires additional elements for criminal liability, such as the act being committed with knowledge of a specific circumstance (direct intent) or with the pursuit of a further purpose, i.e., the achievement of an additional result (offenses requiring a special subjective element).

Furthermore, under Article 510 paragraph 1(e) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a misapplication of substantive criminal law also constitutes grounds for cassation. Such misapplication occurs when the trial court incorrectly applies the law to the facts it has found to be true, or when the violation occurs indirectly, namely when the reasoning of the judgment—comprising the combination of its factual and operative parts and relating to the elements and identity of the offense—contains ambiguities, contradictions, or logical gaps, rendering it impossible to verify, on appeal, whether the law was applied correctly. In such cases, the judgment lacks a lawful basis., According to Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From these provisions, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence detrimental to themselves or another; and

c) Damage to another’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts.

From the above provisions, it is deduced that the crime of fraud is established both objectively and subjectively through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true ones, by which another person is deceived and, as a result, performs an act, omission, or acquiescence involving a disposition of property that directly and necessarily causes financial damage to the deceived person or another, with the intent that the perpetrator or another gain an unlawful benefit. It is irrelevant whether this intended benefit was ultimately achieved.

The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. The false fact must have existed in the past or must be a present circumstance at the time it is asserted, and cannot relate to the future.

However, when future circumstances—that is, promises or contractual obligations—are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or past, in such a way as to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present situation or supposed ability of the perpetrator, who had already made the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is established., According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another person’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision, it follows that for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) Intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, regardless of whether this benefit was actually realized;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which, as a causal factor, someone is deceived and acts in a way that is detrimental to themselves or another (by an act, omission, or acquiescence); and

c) Damage to another’s property, in the sense recognized by civil law, which must be causally linked to the fraudulent conduct (the deceptive act or omission of the perpetrator) and to the resulting deception of the person who made the property disposition. It is not required that the person deceived be the same person who suffered the damage.

Property damage exists when there is a reduction or deterioration in the victim’s assets, even if the victim has an active claim to restitution. However, as an element of the objective aspect of the crime of fraud, the damage must be the direct, necessary, and exclusive result of the property disposition—namely, the act, omission, or acquiescence performed by the person deceived by the perpetrator’s fraudulent conduct.

There must therefore be a causal connection between the perpetrator’s deceptive behavior and the deception it caused, as well as between this deception and the resulting property damage, which must be the direct, necessary, and exclusive outcome of the deception and of the act, omission, or acquiescence of the deceived person.

The term “facts” refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts relating to the present or the past, in such a way as to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on the false present situation presented by a perpetrator who has already made the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is established.

The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed their deceptive conduct—that is, when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a third party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss actually occurred—thus completing the fraud—or the time when the deceived person performed the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant., source_sentence: How are victims tricked in email phishing scams?
sentences: According to Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From these provisions, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence detrimental to themselves or another; and

c) Damage to another’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts.

From the above provisions, it is deduced that the crime of fraud is established both objectively and subjectively through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true ones, by which another person is deceived and, as a result, performs an act, omission, or acquiescence involving a disposition of property that directly and necessarily causes financial damage to the deceived person or another, with the intent that the perpetrator or another gain an unlawful benefit. It is irrelevant whether this intended benefit was ultimately achieved.

The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. The false fact must have existed in the past or must be a present circumstance at the time it is asserted, and cannot relate to the future.

However, when future circumstances—that is, promises or contractual obligations—are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or past, in such a way as to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present situation or supposed ability of the perpetrator, who had already made the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is established., According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit actually materialize;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another; and

c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person who suffered the damage be the same individual.

The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.

The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim possesses an active claim for restitution.

The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant., Email phishing is a type of identity theft scam conducted via email or SMS. The attacker uses social engineering tactics such as impersonating trusted entities and inducing urgency. Victims are tricked into disclosing personal information or downloading malware.

Scenarios:
- Scenario 1: Emails impersonating high-ranking executives accuse victims of crimes to coerce them into revealing information or opening malware-laden attachments.
- Scenario 2: Emails/SMS from fake banks or authorities alert victims of data breaches, directing them to spoofed websites to input credentials.
- Scenario 3: SMS messages deliver disguised malware apps that harvest sensitive data.
- Scenario 4: SMS links lead to pharming sites that mimic trusted brands and steal login data through fake pop-ups., source_sentence: What circumstances do the term 'facts' refer to within the meaning of the provision?
sentences: According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another person’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision, it follows that for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) Intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, regardless of whether this benefit was actually realized;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which, as a causal factor, someone is deceived and acts in a way that is detrimental to themselves or another (by an act, omission, or acquiescence); and

c) Damage to another’s property, in the sense recognized by civil law, which must be causally linked to the fraudulent conduct (the deceptive act or omission of the perpetrator) and to the resulting deception of the person who made the property disposition. It is not required that the person deceived be the same person who suffered the damage.

Property damage exists when there is a reduction or deterioration in the victim’s assets, even if the victim has an active claim to restitution. However, as an element of the objective aspect of the crime of fraud, the damage must be the direct, necessary, and exclusive result of the property disposition—namely, the act, omission, or acquiescence performed by the person deceived by the perpetrator’s fraudulent conduct.

There must therefore be a causal connection between the perpetrator’s deceptive behavior and the deception it caused, as well as between this deception and the resulting property damage, which must be the direct, necessary, and exclusive outcome of the deception and of the act, omission, or acquiescence of the deceived person.

The term “facts” refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts relating to the present or the past, in such a way as to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on the false present situation presented by a perpetrator who has already made the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is established.

The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed their deceptive conduct—that is, when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a third party. Any later time at which the victim’s financial loss actually occurred—thus completing the fraud—or the time when the deceived person performed the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant., 1. Anyone who, by knowingly presenting false facts as true or by unlawfully concealing or withholding true facts, damages another person's property by persuading someone to act, omission, or tolerance with the aim of obtaining, for themselves or another, an unlawful financial gain from the damage to that property shall be punished with imprisonment, "and if the damage caused is particularly great, with imprisonment of at least three (3) months and a fine." .
If the damage caused exceeds a total of one hundred and twenty thousand (120,000) euros, imprisonment of up to ten (10) years and a fine shall be imposed.
2. If the fraud is directed directly against the legal entity of the Greek State, legal entities governed by public law, or local government organizations, and the damage caused exceeds a total of one hundred and twenty thousand (120,000) euros, a prison sentence of at least ten (10) years and a fine of up to one thousand (1,000) daily units shall be imposed. This offense shall be time-barred after twenty (20) years.
, According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit actually materialize;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another; and

c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person who suffered the damage be the same individual.

The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.

The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim possesses an active claim for restitution.

The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant., source_sentence: When is the time of commission of the fraud considered?
sentences: Spear phishing targets specific individuals or employees within an organization using personalized, deceptive emails. Unlike mass phishing, these emails are crafted to seem familiar and urgent.

Scenarios:
- CEO Fraud: Attackers impersonate executives to extract financial or sensitive data from employees.
- Whaling: High-ranking executives are targeted using tailored fraud emails that press for immediate action without verification., According to the provision of Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From this provision it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, without it being necessary that the benefit actually materialize;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence that is detrimental to themselves or another; and

c) Damage to another person’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally linked to the deceptive acts or omissions of the perpetrator. It is not required that the person deceived and the person who suffered the damage be the same individual.

The term “facts”, within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those that will occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. However, when such promises or obligations are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or the past, in such a manner as to create the impression of future fulfillment based on a false present situation fabricated by the perpetrator, who has already formed the decision not to fulfill their obligation, the crime of fraud is established.

The term “property” refers to the totality of a person’s economic assets that possess monetary value, while damage to property means its reduction—specifically, the difference between the monetary value the property had before the disposition caused by the fraudulent conduct and the value remaining after it. Property damage exists even if the victim possesses an active claim for restitution.

The time of commission of the fraud is considered to be the moment when the perpetrator acted and completed their fraudulent conduct, namely when they made the false representations that deceived the victim or a third party. Any subsequent moment at which the victim’s damage actually occurred—thereby completing the fraud—or the time when the victim carried out the harmful act or omission, is irrelevant., According to Article 386 paragraph 1 of the Greek Penal Code,

"Whoever, with the intent to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit, causes damage to another’s property by persuading someone to act, omit, or tolerate something through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or through the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, shall be punished by imprisonment of at least three months, and if the damage caused is particularly large, by imprisonment of at least two years."

From these provisions, it follows that, for the crime of fraud to be established, the following elements are required:

a) The intent of the perpetrator to obtain for themselves or another an unlawful pecuniary benefit;

b) The knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts, as a result of which—serving as the causal factor—someone is deceived and proceeds to an act, omission, or acquiescence detrimental to themselves or another; and

c) Damage to another’s property, as defined under civil law, which must be causally connected to the perpetrator’s deceptive acts.

From the above provisions, it is deduced that the crime of fraud is established both objectively and subjectively through the knowing misrepresentation of false facts as true, or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true ones, by which another person is deceived and, as a result, performs an act, omission, or acquiescence involving a disposition of property that directly and necessarily causes financial damage to the deceived person or another, with the intent that the perpetrator or another gain an unlawful benefit. It is irrelevant whether this intended benefit was ultimately achieved.

The term “facts,” within the meaning of the above provision, refers to real circumstances relating to the past or present, and not to those expected to occur in the future, such as mere promises or contractual obligations. The false fact must have existed in the past or must be a present circumstance at the time it is asserted, and cannot relate to the future.

However, when future circumstances—that is, promises or contractual obligations—are accompanied by false assurances and representations of other false facts referring to the present or past, in such a way as to create the impression of future fulfillment, based on a false present situation or supposed ability of the perpetrator, who had already made the decision not to fulfill their obligation, then the crime of fraud is established.
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: cosine_accuracy@1, cosine_accuracy@3, cosine_accuracy@5, cosine_accuracy@10, cosine_precision@1, cosine_precision@3, cosine_precision@5, cosine_precision@10, cosine_recall@1, cosine_recall@3, cosine_recall@5, cosine_recall@10, cosine_ndcg@10, cosine_mrr@10, cosine_map@100
model-index: name: multilingual_e5_large Finetuned on Data
results: task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 1024
type: dim_1024
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.5079365079365079
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.4666666666666666
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.4428571428571429
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.08218864468864469
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.22275641025641024
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.2958638583638584
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.4766483516483517
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.5598242514045669
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.5374149659863945
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.6534286699882501
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 768
type: dim_768
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.5079365079365079
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.4666666666666666
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.4428571428571429
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.08218864468864469
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.22275641025641024
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.2958638583638584
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.4766483516483517
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.5598242514045669
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.5374149659863945
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.653075337994289
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 512
type: dim_512
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.5079365079365079
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.4666666666666666
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.4428571428571429
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.08218864468864469
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.22275641025641024
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.2958638583638584
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.4766483516483517
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.5598242514045669
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.5374149659863945
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.6492208787775379
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 256
type: dim_256
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.6666666666666666
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.6031746031746031
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.5619047619047619
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.5190476190476192
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.08600427350427349
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.2342032967032967
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.31494200244200243
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.5028998778998779
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.6420780535145918
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.6258503401360545
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.6975707466438095
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 128
type: dim_128
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.6190476190476191
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.5238095238095238
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.5079365079365079
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.4666666666666666
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.4428571428571429
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.0811965811965812
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.21978021978021975
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.2909035409035409
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.46672771672771673
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.5598242514045669
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.5374149659863945
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.6478872365910466
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 64
type: dim_64
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.42857142857142855
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.47619047619047616
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.47619047619047616
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.5714285714285714
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.42857142857142855
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.4444444444444445
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.419047619047619
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.3952380952380953
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.054410866910866905
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.18704212454212454
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.27602258852258854
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.43696581196581197
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.4917595713548203
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.45804988662131524
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.5872011588310861
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 23
Created: 2025-09-12 07:19:22