Model: ashwinpatti/all-mpnet-base-v2_political_view_ft-legal-ft-v0
Author: ashwinpatti
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, mpnet, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:4278, loss:ContrastiveLoss, arxiv:1908.10084, base_model:sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2, base_model:finetune:sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2, model-index, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
Card metadata: tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:4278, loss:ContrastiveLoss
base_model: sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
widget: source_sentence: Letitia James Suffers HUGE Legal Defeat In New York Home Politics Entertainment Download Our News App Shop Here Connect with us Trending Politics Conservative Breaking News and Commentary Letitia James Suffers HUGE Legal Defeat In New York Home Politics Entertainment Download Our News App Shop Here Politics Letitia James Suffers HUGE Legal Defeat In New York Politics Royal Prince Passes Away At Just 22 Politics NEW: Pope Francis Gets Encouraging Medical Update Politics LeBron James Gets In Reporter's Face In Heated Blow-Up Politics JUST IN: Zelenskyy Folds, Apologizes To Trump For Oval Office Incident Politics Former Iraqi Refugee Pleads Guilty To Providing Material Support For ISIS Politics JUST IN: JFK's Chilling Memo To CIA Days Before His Death Is Revealed, Raises Questions Politics NEW: DOGE Announces Its Next Target Politics WATCH: DC's 'Black Lives Matter Plaza' Is Dismantled Politics JUST IN: Watchdog Claims Biden Team Used 'Autopen' To Sign Executive Orders Politics Letitia James Suffers HUGE Legal Defeat In New York Published 7 months ago on August 26, 2024 By Chris Powell A federal judge has ruled in favor of several crisis pregnancy centers, allowing them to continue promoting an abortion pill reversal protocol. The decision is a victory for pro-life advocates in the ongoing battle over reproductive rights in the state. U.S. District Judge John Sinatra issued a preliminary injunction last week, effectively blocking New York Attorney General Letitia James’ efforts to silence pro-life organizations that provide information about the abortion pill reversal process. The ruling came after James initiated lawsuits against 11 pregnancy centers across New York, accusing them of false advertising and endangering women’s health by promoting the reversal protocol. The abortion pill reversal process, which is backed by several pro-life organizations, involves administering bioidentical progesterone to counteract the effects of mifepristone, a synthetic steroid commonly used in chemical abortions. Proponents of the method argue that it offers women a second chance if they regret starting the abortion process and wish to continue their pregnancies. The concept of “abortion pill reversal” (APR) emerged as a response to the use of the abortion pill, mifepristone, which is typically used in combination with another pill, misoprostol, to medically terminate a pregnancy. The process of APR was introduced to provide women who take mifepristone and then change their minds about terminating their pregnancies an option to potentially reverse the effects and continue their pregnancies. In his decision, Judge Sinatra wrote , “The First Amendment protects Plaintiffs’ right to speak freely about [abortion pill reversal] protocol and, more specifically, to say that it is safe and effective for a pregnant woman to use in consultation with her doctor. Indeed, the ‘very purpose of the First Amendment is to foreclose public authority from assuming a guardianship of the public mind through regulating the press, speech, and religion.’” The plaintiffs in the case include the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), Gianna’s House, and the Options Care Center. Represented by the conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), these organizations argued that James’ actions infringed upon their constitutional rights. ADF attorney Caleb Dalton praised the court’s decision, stating, “Women in New York have literally saved their babies from an in-progress chemical drug abortion because they had access to information through their local pregnancy centers about using safe and effective progesterone for abortion pill reversal.” For the past 25 years, it’s been my privilege to be a volunteer and board member at Aid for Women, a nonprofit that runs maternity homes and pregnancy services throughout Illinois. Last night, after the closing of the DNC, vandals attacked one of AFW’s Chicago locations. pic.twitter.com/yieCfi3XqE — Mary H. FioRito (@maryfiorito) August 23, 2024 The ruling comes at a time when crisis pregnancy centers have faced increasing scrutiny and attacks from pro-abortion rights advocates, particularly in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. These centers, which often operate under religious affiliations, provide counseling and support for women seeking alternatives to abortion. James’ lawsuits against the pregnancy centers were part of an effort by her office to crack down on what she called deceptive practices. Her legal team contended that the abortion pill reversal protocol lacks sufficient scientific backing and could expose women to unnecessary risks. However, Judge Sinatra’s ruling effectively halted this campaign, at least for the time being. (VOTE: Are You Supporting TRUMP Or KAMALA In November?) Related Topics: Abortion APR John Sinatra Letitia James New York Pro-Life "Download our shopping app and use promo code ILMF for 40% off your first purchase" (mobile users only) About Advertise Sitemap Affiliate Disclosure Partners Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 Trending Politics
sentences: Abortion by state: Tracking trigger laws, bans, or restrictions IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Skip to Content NBC News Logo Politics Local New York Los Angeles Chicago Dallas-Fort Worth Philadelphia Washington, D.C. Boston Bay Area South Florida San Diego Connecticut U.S. News World Health Business Editors' picks Shopping Tipline Sports Science Culture & Trends Share & Save — My News Manage Profile Email Preferences Sign Out Search Search Profile My News Sign Out Sign In Create your free profile Sections U.S. News Decision 2024 Politics World Business Sports Investigations Culture & Trends Health Science Tech & Media Weather Video Features Photos NBC Select NBC Asian America NBC BLK NBC Latino NBC OUT Local New York Los Angeles Chicago Dallas-Fort Worth Philadelphia Washington, D.C. Boston Bay Area South Florida San Diego Connecticut tv Today Nightly News MSNBC Meet the Press Dateline Featured NBC News Now Nightly Films Stay Tuned Special Features Newsletters Podcasts Listen Now More From NBC CNBC NBC.COM NBCU Academy Peacock NEXT STEPS FOR VETS NBC News Site Map Help Follow NBC News news Alerts There are no new alerts at this time Search Search Facebook Twitter Email SMS Print Whatsapp Reddit Pocket Flipboard Pinterest Linkedin Latest Stories Politics U.S. News World Health Business Editors' picks Shopping Tipline Sports Science Culture & Trends Data Graphics Abortion law tracker: See where the procedure is legal, banned or restricted in the U.S. NBC News is tracking the status of state-level abortion laws and restrictions across the country, as well as exceptions in places where bans are in effect. Maria Rago protests for abortion rights at the Utah State Capitol in Salt Lake City. Rick Bowmer / AP / Updated By Danica Jefferies , JoElla Carman and Nigel Chiwaya The state of abortion rights has been upended by the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade . As of Nov. 6, more than a dozen states have banned abortions or no longer have facilities where women can receive them. The bans have kicked off a wave of legal challenges in several states. NBC News is tracking the status of state-level abortion laws and restrictions across the country, as well as exceptions in places where bans are in effect. This map will be updated periodically. Danica Jefferies Danica Jefferies is an intern with the Data Graphics team for NBC News JoElla Carman JoElla Carman is the Data Graphics Interactive Visual Designer Nigel Chiwaya Nigel Chiwaya is the Senior Editor, Data Viz for NBC News Digital. Joe Murphy contributed . About Contact Help Careers Ad Choices Privacy Policy Your Privacy Choices CA Notice Terms of Service (Updated JULY 7, 2023) NBC News Sitemap Closed Captioning Advertise Select Shopping © 2025 NBCUniversal Media, LLC NBC News Logo MSNBC Logo Today Logo, Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? Accessibility help Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer Sign In Subscribe Open side navigation menu Open search bar Financial Times Subscribe Sign In Search the FT Search Close search bar Close Home World Sections World Home Middle East war Global Economy UK US China Africa Asia Pacific Emerging Markets Europe War in Ukraine Americas Middle East & North Africa Most Read Wall Street stocks tumble as investors fret over US economic slowdown Trump is making Europe great again Tanker carrying jet fuel for US Navy struck by container ship in North Sea Mark Carney to replace Trudeau as Canada’s prime minister Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates US Sections US Home US Economy Investing in America US Companies US Politics & Policy US Presidential Election 2024 Most Read Wall Street stocks tumble as investors fret over US economic slowdown Trump is making Europe great again Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates Musk claims cyber attack on social network X came from ‘Ukraine area’ Mark Carney takes on Trump’s America Companies Sections Companies Home Energy Financials Health Industrials Media Professional Services Retail & Consumer Tech Sector Telecoms Transport Most Read Tesla’s crash back towards reality, in several charts Tanker carrying jet fuel for US Navy struck by container ship in North Sea Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates KPMG to merge dozens of partnerships in overhaul of global structure Musk claims cyber attack on social network X came from ‘Ukraine area’ Tech Sections Tech Home Artificial intelligence Semiconductors Cyber Security Social Media Most Read Musk claims cyber attack on social network X came from ‘Ukraine area’ Banks and fintechs join ‘stablecoin gold rush’ OpenAI strikes $12bn deal with CoreWeave AI frenzy leads US venture capital to biggest splurge in three years Chinese investors privately take stakes in Musk’s companies Markets Sections Markets Home Alphaville Markets Data Crypto Capital Markets Commodities Currencies Equities Wealth Management Moral Money ETF Hub Fund Management Trading Most Read Wall Street stocks tumble as investors fret over US economic slowdown Tesla’s crash back towards reality, in several charts Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates What will Trump mean for personal wealth? Donald Trump bets propel Michael Platt’s BlueCrest to 15% gain Climate Opinion Sections Opinion Home Columnists The FT View The Big Read Lex Obituaries Letters Most Read Trump is making Europe great again The UK’s academic recession is in full swing Mark Carney takes on Trump’s America What will Trump mean for personal wealth? The new economic stars born through crisis Lex Work & Careers Sections Work & Careers Home Business School Rankings Business Education Europe's Start-Up Hubs Entrepreneurship Recruitment Business Books Business Travel Working It Most Read The office lunch disrupters Noteworthy new books on economics The sobering new state of feminism Writing this memo does not count as one of your five things Retail’s last barbarian: the private equity group about to play hardball with Boots Life & Arts Sections Life & Arts Home Arts Books Food & Drink FT Magazine House & Home Style Puzzles Travel FT Globetrotter Most Read Champagne and Parmigiano under threat from Trump’s tariffs Chess: Oxford vs Cambridge almost level after 152 years This season’s fashion stars? Older men Lucky Boy podcast review — a life derailed by a teacher-schoolboy relationship How to read Jay Rayner’s FT restaurant reviews free for 30 days HTSI Menu Search Home World US Companies Tech Markets Climate Opinion Lex Work & Careers Life & Arts HTSI Financial Times Subscribe Sign In Search the FT Search Close search bar Close FT Podcast FT News Briefing Add to myFT Get instant alerts for this topic Manage your delivery channels here Remove from myFT Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? Elon Musk has become a powerful force in Republican politics. Not everyone is on board. Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on x (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on facebook (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on linkedin (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on x (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on facebook (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on linkedin (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save Published January 4 2025 Jump to comments section Print this page Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free Your guide to what the 2024 US election means for Washington and the world Your browser does not support playing this file but you can still download the MP3 file to play locally. Elon Musk’s first big foray into politics was a success — he used his world-leading fortune and mass media platform to help Donald Trump regain the White House. But now, just weeks before Trump’s inauguration, some Republicans are pushing back against Musk’s influence. The FT’s Washington correspondent Joe Miller and US business and politics correspondent Alex Rogers join this week’s Swamp Notes to discuss how Musk is navigating a future in Washington. Mentioned in this podcast: Top Democrats warm to Elon Musk’s US government cost-cutting mission Elon Musk’s fight with Maga reveals split on immigration within Trump’s circle Sign up for the FT’s Swamp Notes newsletter here Swamp Notes is mixed by Samantha Giovinco and produced by Ethan Plotkin, Sonja Hutson, Lauren Fedor and Marc Filippino. Topher Forhecz is the FT’s executive producer. The FT’s global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. Special thanks to Pierre Nicholson. CREDIT: Bannons_WarRoom/X Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com View our accessibility guide . Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025 . All rights reserved. Reuse this content (opens in new window) Comments Jump to comments section Promoted Content Follow the topics in this audio US politics & policy Add to myFT Donald Trump Add to myFT Elon Musk Add to myFT FT News Briefing Add to myFT Comments Comments have not been enabled for this article. Useful links Support View Site Tips Help Centre Contact Us About Us Accessibility myFT Tour Careers Suppliers Legal & Privacy Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Manage Cookies Copyright Slavery Statement & Policies Services Share News Tips Securely Individual Subscriptions Professional Subscriptions Republishing Executive Job Search Advertise with the FT Follow the FT on X FT Channels FT Schools Tools Portfolio FT App FT Digital Edition FT Edit Alerts Hub Business School Rankings Subscription Manager News feed Newsletters Currency Converter Community & Events FT Live Events FT Forums Board Director Programme More from the FT Group Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2025. FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd. The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice . Close side navigation menu Edition: International UK Search the FT Search Subscribe for full access Top sections Home World Show more World Middle East war Global Economy UK US China Africa Asia Pacific Emerging Markets Europe War in Ukraine Americas Middle East & North Africa US Show more US US Economy Investing in America US Companies US Politics & Policy US Presidential Election 2024 Companies Show more Companies Energy Financials Health Industrials Media Professional Services Retail & Consumer Tech Sector Telecoms Transport Tech Show more Tech Artificial intelligence Semiconductors Cyber Security Social Media Markets Show more Markets Alphaville Markets Data Crypto Capital Markets Commodities Currencies Equities Wealth Management Moral Money ETF Hub Fund Management Trading Climate Opinion Show more Opinion Columnists The FT View The Big Read Lex Obituaries Letters Lex Work & Careers Show more Work & Careers Business School Rankings Business Education Europe's Start-Up Hubs Entrepreneurship Recruitment Business Books Business Travel Working It Life & Arts Show more Life & Arts Arts Books Food & Drink FT Magazine House & Home Style Puzzles Travel FT Globetrotter Personal Finance Show more Personal Finance Property & Mortgages Investments Pensions Tax Banking & Savings Advice & Comment Next Act HTSI Special Reports FT recommends Alphaville FT Edit Lunch with the FT FT Globetrotter #techAsia Moral Money Visual and data journalism Newsletters Video Podcasts News feed FT Schools FT Live Events FT Forums Board Director Programme myFT Portfolio FT Digital Edition Crossword Our Apps Help Centre Subscribe Sign In, Elon Musk helped Trump win. Now he's looking at Europe, and many politicians are alarmed - Japan Today News Real estate Travel Study Jobs Health Newsletter Signup Register / Login × Japan Today National Crime Entertainment Politics Business Tech Sports World Features Spotlight Home National Crime Entertainment Politics Business Tech Sports World Features Lifestyle Environment New Products Health Food Travel Kuchikomi When They Opened in Japan Japan Yesterday Opinions Events Executive Impact Spotlight Special Promotion Podcasts Recent Comments Popular Appearance JapanToday Sotokanda S Bldg. 4F 5-2-1 Sotokanda Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 101-0021 Japan Tel: +81 3 5829 5900 Fax: +81 3 5829 5919 Email: editor@japantoday.com ©2025 GPlusMedia Inc. Here and Now opinions Elon Musk helped Trump win. Now he's looking at Europe, and many politicians are alarmed Jan. 8 03:34 am JST Jan. 23 | 12:00 am JST 20 Comments By JILL LAWLESS LONDON The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission. ©2025 GPlusMedia Inc. Join teamLab! Innovate through Art Apply Now Sort by Oldest Latest Popular 20 Comments Login to comment TaiwanIsNotChina Jan. 8 06:33 am JST I would hope European countries would have the institutions to tell Elmo where he can shove his money. -3 ( +3 / -6 ) GBR48 Jan. 8 07:38 am JST Anyone funding extremism can be classed as a terrorist and blocked from entry. Appeasing Trump will work as well as appeasing Hitler did. European security services need to realise that the main threat they now face in internal and right wing, supported by Musk's money, not China, Russia, Jihadists or environmentalists. And this threat is existential. Musk has enough cash to buy power in most countries. So use the political tools at your disposal to prevent this. The legal ones and the covert ones. And get up to speed really quickly, because Musk is enjoying this and won't stop. Washington is no longer an ally of Western democracies, but their most dangerous enemy. -1 ( +5 / -6 ) Geeter Mckluskie Jan. 8 09:21 am JST Europeans will make their own decisions about their political fate. If they are influenced by Musk, then so be it. That's their prerogative. Musk is using X “a bit like an old-style newspaper mogul,” to promulgate his political views. Yes, just as the likes of the BBC use their platform to promulgate left-wing views. Ultimately, the people will decide which of these opposing views is in line with their political preference. -1 ( +6 / -7 ) itsonlyrocknroll Jan. 8 02:15 pm JST How much influence does Elon Musk wield over President elect Donald Trump? This question is causing political nerves to become increasingly frayed across Europe. Musk constant verbal assaults on Keir Starmer, UK elected Prime Minister, his blatant meddling in the up and coming German elections is unacceptable. To endorse a candidate, then on his own social media platform X livestream an interview Thursday with the AfD's Weidel, is outrageous interference. What is also disturbing is Europe's leaders appeasing Elon Musk, when they should be beating a path to the oval office demand Elon Musk cease and desist. -6 ( +0 / -6 ) itsonlyrocknroll Jan. 8 02:37 pm JST The main stream press media liberal elite totally foolishly under-estimated Donald Trump. Trump is using Elon Musk like a political blunt instrument, "coshing" Europe's leadership with impunity. Heavens sake wake up. -4 ( +1 / -5 ) wallace Jan. 8 02:42 pm JST Musk is using his power, money, and X platform to influence elections and countries and now being an appointed member of the Trump cabinet should not be doing that and harming relationships with allies of the US. His actions are highly disturbing. -2 ( +3 / -5 ) Harry_Gatto Jan. 8 03:10 pm JST Two spoiled rich kids who have never experienced anyone saying NO to them. How the American public could be so easily taken in by a loud-mouthed oik like Trump is beyond my ken and as for the unelected Musk he should be banned from entering any country where he tries to interfere with its government. Hit him where it hurts, ban his products like X and Tesla too. -1 ( +3 / -4 ) wallace Jan. 8 03:54 pm JST Musk is a megalomaniac. The Trump-Musk bromance won't last the course. 0 ( +5 / -5 ) Roger Gusain Jan. 8 06:21 pm JST Elon is shining light into dark corners. God bless him. -6 ( +3 / -9 ) Roger Gusain Jan. 8 06:39 pm JST Starmer has managed to unite the country -- everyone hates him. What is he hiding? I am not sure I want to find out. -5 ( +3 / -8 ) Zaphod Jan. 8 06:54 pm JST Roger Gusain Starmer has managed to unite the country Unite?? In what universe? -4 ( +3 / -7 ) Great Bird Jan. 8 07:15 pm JST Unite?? In what universe? Magaverse 0 ( +2 / -2 ) R B Quinn Jan. 8 08:42 pm JST Musk has become the second most dangerous embarrassment in the United States of America after the former Insurrectionist-in-Chief. 1 ( +3 / -2 ) ClippetyClop Jan. 8 09:04 pm JST 'Tariffs' should become Europe's favourite word too. On Musk's dull cars. See how gobby he is when it affects his salary. 2 ( +3 / -1 ) itsonlyrocknroll Jan. 8 09:52 pm JST It would be helpful to listen to AfD Candidate Alice Weidel state in her own words AfD manifesto. Germany Election: AfD Candidate Alice Weidel on Election, EU, Trump, Energy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeYB_Hmsu84 0 ( +2 / -2 ) Zaphod Jan. 8 11:29 pm JST R B Quinn Musk has become the second most dangerous embarrassment in the United States of America after the former Insurrectionist-in-Chief. Musk turned Twitter from an elitist propaganda machine back into free speech platform. For that alone, you might be a tad grateful. -1 ( +2 / -3 ) wallace Jan. 8 11:48 pm JST The father of Musk made a public statement Musk wants to buy Liverpool FC because his grandmother was born there and still has relatives in the city. Though he has never visited the city of his relatives. Today, the current owners issued a statement stating the club is not for sale. The fans too issued a strongly worded statement telling him where to put his offer. 1 ( +2 / -1 ) TaiwanIsNotChina Jan. 9 02:40 am JST ZaphodJan. 8 11:34 pm JST TaiwanIsNotChina I would hope European countries would have the institutions to tell Elmo where he can shove his money. Funny thing, I do not remember any of the people who are now demonizing Musk saying anything about the big money behind the elitist political machine. George Soros and his "open society foundation" with its tentacles everywhere? Facebook and Google, who might have been able to swing the US election, had Musk not been there as a counterbalace? Crickets.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC Party line decision and argued against by the Obama administration. QED 0 ( +0 / -0 ) Peter Neil Jan. 9 03:47 am JST “Look at what happened in the U.S. His bet on Trump worked. He is playing the same game in Europe.” getting elected is not governing. any fool can get elected. look at houses of parliament and the u.s. congress, for example. 1 ( +1 / -0 ) Login to leave a comment Facebook users Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts. Facebook Connect Login with your JapanToday account Remember Me Forgot password? User registration How to Buy a Home in Japan as a Foreigner Learn how to buy a home in Japan, including financing options, marketing trends and recommended properties. The webinar will be held from 6PM to 7PM (Japan Standard Time) on Mar 13, 2025. Click Here! Click Here Opinions Today 04:40 am JST Today | 04:40 am JST 1 Comment COVID-19 is latest epidemic to show that biomedical breakthroughs aren’t enough to eliminate a disease Mar. 10 06:17 am JST Mar. 10 | 06:17 am JST 7 Comments DOGE threat: How government data would give an AI company extraordinary power Mar. 9 04:42 am JST Mar. 9 | 06:27 am JST 7 Comments U.S.-Hamas talks complicate Gaza truce efforts: analysts View all Popular Zelenskyy in Saudi Arabia as U.S. voices hope for Ukraine peace talks 79 Comments Trump complains U.S.-Japan alliance unequal 156 Comments Japan's shortage of full-time workers at worst level since COVID 68 Comments Mark Carney, crisis-fighting central banker, to lead Canada through U.S. trade war 63 Comments Trump declines to predict whether recession could result from his tariff moves 56 Comments View all Articles, Offers & Useful Resources A mix of what's trending on our other sites Graduate Schools in Japan for English-Speaking Students GaijinPot Blog Organic Food in Japan: 10 Tips For Buying It Savvy Tokyo Kitaasaba Nissai Cherry Blossom Festival GaijinPot Travel Travel What’s The Best Internet Provider in Japan? GaijinPot Blog Hibikinada Ryokuchi Green Park GaijinPot Travel events Tokyo Events For March 2025 Savvy Tokyo What Should You Do If You Get Into a Car Accident in Japan? GaijinPot Blog Baba Mountain Sakura GaijinPot Travel Health Social Fitness Groups to Keep Active in Japan GaijinPot Blog Akima Plum Grove Festival GaijinPot Travel Lifestyle How Safe is Tokyo for Women & Families? Savvy Tokyo How to Start a Business in Japan On a Work Visa GaijinPot Blog National Crime Entertainment Politics Business Tech Sports World Features Lifestyle Environment New Products Health Food Travel Kuchikomi When They Opened in Japan Japan Yesterday Opinions Events Executive Impact Spotlight ©2025 GPlusMedia Inc. Privacy Terms of Service Moderation Policy 広告掲載 / Advertise 総合案内 / About us 編集部 / Contact us 運営会社 / Company Profile, source_sentence: Trump funding cut a dangerous and deadly decision - Asia Times Want to comment on Asia Times stories? Sign up here Sign in with Google Or Sign up Sign in to an existing account Thank you for registering! An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link. Close Sign In Search for: Search China Southeast Asia Military Northeast Asia Business Open dropdown menu Trade Finance Technology World Open dropdown menu United States US-China South Asia Middle East Ukraine War Opinion Membership Open dropdown menu My account Our Subscription offers AT+ Premium Access Help Asia Times Survive Newsletters Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS Close Skip to content Support Asia Times Keep independent journalism alive Support us Asia Times Covering geo-political news and current affairs across Asia Sign In Menu Sign In China Southeast Asia Military Northeast Asia Business Open dropdown menu Trade Finance Technology World Open dropdown menu United States US-China South Asia Middle East Ukraine War Opinion Membership Open dropdown menu My account Our Subscription offers AT+ Premium Access Help Asia Times Survive Newsletters Open Search Search for: Search Posted in AT Finance , Australia , China , India , Mexico , Middle East , Northeast Asia , Oceania , South Asia , South Korea , Vietnam , World Trump funding cut a dangerous and deadly decision Around 830 women and girls die in childbirth each day – cutting funding to UNFPA signals a disturbing disregard for the health and human rights of women by Sharon Bessell April 18, 2017 February 18, 2020 Click to share on X (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Click to print (Opens in new window) Pregnant women practice yoga. Photo: Reuters, China Daily The birth of a child is usually a cause for celebration; a moment of wonder, as a new tiny life enters the world. This celebration plays out across the world every day when a wanted child is born to a woman who is supported on the journey to motherhood. But in some parts of the world, in some situations, the birth of a child is a devastating event. Every day, children are born to women and girls who did not choose to become pregnant. Rather than a moment of celebration, the birth of a child in these circumstances is the manifestation of a woman’s – or girl’s – complete lack of control over her body and life. Daily, children are born with no trained birth attendants present, to women – and girls – who labor without intervention when it is desperately needed. Daily 830 women die in childbirth; the vast majority in developing countries. Let’s just repeat that figure: every day 830 women and girls die in childbirth. The politics of sexual and reproductive health and rights are deeply worrying – and here we see regress rather than progress with the US government’s most recent position They die from bleeding, infection, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, and complications during delivery. Most causes of maternal death are preventable or treatable . When governments step back from supporting safe and accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare – as the USA did in withdrawing funding from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) last week – more women will die. That is the reality. Global progress and the role of UNFPA Between 1990 and 2015, considerable progress was made, with maternal mortality declining by about 44%. From 2000, improvements accelerated in the wake of the adoption of Millennium Development Goal 5 on improving maternal health. This is the good news, but the situation remains dire for many women and girls, and continued progress remains fragile. Podcast: Babatunde Osotimehin on why sexual and reproductive health are a foundation for development The UNFPA has been at the forefront of global efforts to make childbirth safe for both women and their babies, and to ensure that women and girls have access to reproductive health care and safe, reliable forms of contraception. The goal of UNFPA is to deliver a world where every pregnancy is wanted, every childbirth is safe and every young person’s potential is fulfilled. This is an aim that should not be subject to debate. Who could possibly argue that women and girls should be forced into pregnancy against their will, that childbirth should not be safe, that the potential of young people should not be fulfilled? And yet, the work of UNFPA and other organizations that aim to provide women and girls with choice over their lives and – when they choose to become mothers – to provide safe and supported pregnancies and childbirth, continues to come under attack. Latest stories Opposition builds to Germany’s trillion-dollar debt plan N Korea’s nuclear sub engulfed in a sea of doubt Faction led by North’s old pal rises in major South Korean party The US withdrawal of funding Last week, the Trump administration announced that it will end funding to UNFPA – it gave the organization US$75 million in 2015. Announcing the withdrawal, the US State Department claimed that in partnering with the Chinese government, the UNFPA is implicated in the coercive practices used in China to curb population growth . This issue is a complex one. No doubt, often brutal coercion has underpinned the approach of the Chinese government in the past, and a woman’s right to make decisions about the number of children they have continues to be regulated. China’s approach to family planning is controversial. Photo: AFP/Nicolas Asfouri China’s one-child policy , introduced in 1979, has been the subject of criticism both within and outside China. The policy was loosened in 2013, and ended in 2015; from the beginning of 2016, a two-child policy was introduced. While China’s approach to family planning is rightly controversial, there is no evidence to suggest that the UNFPA has ever been involved in or supported coercive practices. There is, though, overwhelming evidence that the UNFPA works tirelessly, in China and elsewhere, to prevent women and girls being subjected to coercive sexual activity and to unwanted pregnancy. At a recent talk at Crawford School of Public Policy, executive director of the UNFPA, Dr Babatunde Osotimehin spoke powerfully of the importance of women and girls being empowered to take control their sexual and reproductive health and to exercise their rights as human beings. In an accompanying interview, I was involved in for the Policy Forum, Dr Osotimehin explained the role of the UNFPA in providing support, services and education in countries, and particularly in the context of humanitarian and natural disasters where women and girls are especially vulnerable. Withdrawing funding from the UNFPA is a direct assault on the services that are vital to securing women’s and girls’ well-being and human rights. The complexities of abortion Central to the US decision to withdraw funding to the UNFPA is the allegation that the agency has supported forced abortions in China. The UNFPA does not promote abortion as a method of family planning, nor does it engage in debates about the legal status of abortion. The agency does advocate for , and support post-abortion care and argues that health systems must deal with complications that result from unsafe abortions and are often life-threatening. In the US, the politics of abortion are deeply divisive domestically and have shaped policies toward international development assistance for decades. The Kemp-Kasten amendment to the appropriations bill was adopted in 1985, prohibiting the provision of US aid to any organization determined by the US Administration as supporting coercive abortion or forced sterilization. The prohibition of such violations of women’s rights is on the face of it welcome, yet the Kemp-Kasten amendment has been used in highly political ways that have little to do with supporting the rights of women. The amendment was used by the Bush administration in 2002 to withdraw funding from the UNFPA, a decision that was later reversed by the Obama administration. The most recent enactment of the Kemp-Kasten amendment reflects the continuing division between Republicans and Democrats on foreign aid and engagement with global development priorities. It also highlights the extent to which those debates play out through control over women’s bodies. Indian woman is denied abortion at 26 weeks. Photo: Wikimedia Commons The politics of women’s bodies The politics of sexual and reproductive health and rights are deeply worrying – and here we see regress rather than progress with the US government’s most recent position. The withdrawal of US funding to UNFPA follows the Presidential Memorandum Regarding the Mexico City Policy, issued by Trump on the first full day of his presidency. That order went further than previous Republican administrations in the restrictions it placed on organizations providing a range of health services in developing countries. Withdrawing funding from the UNFPA is a direct assault on the services that are vital to securing women’s and girls’ well-being and human rights. Photo: Reuters/Kham The order – commonly known as the “global gag rule” – requires organizations to certify that they will not use either US funds or non-US funds to provide abortion services, to counsel patients about the option of abortion or to advocate for the liberalization of abortion laws Sign up for one of our free newsletters The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories Sign up The order was met with alarm by organizations around the world who provide a wide range of health services, as well as those dealing with the realities and complexities of women’s lives and the difficult decisions women must make in situations of unwanted or forced pregnancy. That many women have no choice but to seek abortion when contraception is unavailable or unreliable, and when they have no control over the bodies, appears lost on Trump and the cartel of suited, middle-aged men who surrounded him as he signed the executive order in January. The use of women’s bodies to advance particular ideological and political agendas is not new. Nowhere is this more apparent than in global debates about women’s and girls’ right to access reproductive and sexual health services, including safe and reliable contraception and safe abortion. Abortion is often used by ultra-conservative groups as the justification for denying women a range of sexual and reproductive health services. That very few women use abortion as contraception; that women and girls who face the awful dilemma of dealing with an unplanned, unwanted and perhaps life-threatening pregnancy will seek abortion whether it is safe and legal or not; that an estimated 47,000 women and girls die every year from unsafe abortions is peripheral to the politics of control that prevent women and girls making decisions about their bodies. The withdrawal by the Trump Administration of funding to the UNFPA signals a disturbing disregard for the health and human rights of women. It is counter to global discourse that promotes the empowerment of women and the right to access health care. It is a decision that disregards evidence and reason. It is a decision that will undermine the rights of women and girls to control their bodies and, for some, it will be a death warrant. Dr Sharon Bessell is the Director of the Children’s Policy Centre in Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University. This piece was first published at Policy Forum , Asia and the Pacific’s platform for public policy analysis and opinion. Read the original here : Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories Sign in with Google Or Sign up Sign in to an existing account Thank you for registering! An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link. Click to share on X (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Click to print (Opens in new window) Tagged: Abortion , Arts & Culture , China , Creative Commons , Economy , Entertainment , Health , Interviews , Policy Forum , Politics , UN Sustainable Development Goals , United States , Women's Rights , World AT+ Premium stories Trump trade wars making stagflation great again Developing Asia in a Trump-tariff, China-dumping squeeze Japan’s Astroscale transforms into defense contractor Trump tariffs could be bargaining chip or economic bomb Asia easing fast and furious against Trump’s tariffs Alibaba making China tech investible again Trump tariffs driving UK-Japan trade ties No friends, only foes in Trump’s trade war onslaught Musk’s politics taking a toll on troubled Tesla Behind China’s ‘secret’ laser facility Top trending stories China all in on RISC-V open-source chip design US hopes robo-ships can outwit China's superior naval numbers China 'mass produces' semiconductor-related papers Nehru's ghost haunts Modi's China failure How S Korea would respond to Taiwan hostilities Can China keep winning without fighting? Ukraine says it wants to negotiate 'peace framework' in Riyadh Abandoned by Trump, Ukraine still has the insurgency card US bets on F/A-XX as China air power races ahead Trump trade wars making stagflation great again Military & Security US eyes Euro-Japanese next-gen fighter program March 5, 2025 With US military aid cut, Ukraine prepares to fight alone March 4, 2025 US bets on F/A-XX as China air power races ahead March 3, 2025 New US missile aims to pierce China’s rising air power March 1, 2025 China explores military applications with DeepSeek March 1, 2025 China’s live-fire flex shows Australia is no naval match February 28, 2025 China puts Philippines on hypersonic nuke alert February 25, 2025 Tired of the gaslighting? The mainstream media told you Economic sanctions would kill the Russian economy US tech sanctions would shut down China’s semiconductor industry Russia is taking massive casualties in Ukraine and will have to negotiate China’s property market will collapse its economy And so on, every day and in every major news outlet. The facts didn’t support the gaslighting. When the facts are clear, Asia Times gives you the facts; when they are controversial, Asia Times gives you the controversy. We urgently need your support to keep on doing so. Independent, fact-based, unbiased journalism needs YOU to stay alive. If you decide to back Asia Times, please choose a monthly, annual, or one-time payment. One-time Monthly Annually One-time $20 $50 $100 Other Donation amount $ Monthly $5 $8 $25 Other Donation amount per month $ Annually $25 $50 $150 Other Donation amount per year $ Your contribution is appreciated. Donate Now Not ready to support today? Remind me later Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS About Us Contact Us Write for us FAQ Terms of Service Support Asia Times Keep free journalism alive Support us © 2025 Covering geopolitical news and current affairs across Asia Powered by Newspack Privacy Policy Sign in Close Sign in with Google Or Enter the code sent to your email. Email address Enter your password Sign in by entering the code we sent to , or clicking the magic link in the email. Continue Resend code Email me a one-time code instead Forgot password Create an account Sign in to an existing account Go back Continue Set a password (optional) Complete your transaction Close
sentences: Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens dead at 99 - BNO News Home U.S. News World Politics Legal Health Business Entertainment Menu Contact Us E-mail alerts BNO News Wire Service ENS Alerts Live feeds Connect with us BNO News Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens dead at 99 Home U.S. News Ontario imposes 25% surcharge on U.S. electricity exports amid trade tensions InfoWars reporter Jamie White killed outside Austin apartment 3 killed after medical helicopter crashes near Jackson, Mississippi Maryland reports measles case in resident who returned from international travel Indiana man shot by agents after brandishing gun near White House World Former Philippine President Duterte arrested for crimes against humanity Bus crash in southwest Mexico leaves 18 dead, over 20 injured Cargo ship collides with tanker off England; 1 missing Pope Francis’ health improves, doctors lift reserved prognosis Mark Carney elected leader of Canada’s Liberal Party Politics Former Philippine President Duterte arrested for crimes against humanity Ontario imposes 25% surcharge on U.S. electricity exports amid trade tensions Mark Carney elected leader of Canada’s Liberal Party Trump to Hamas: Release hostages now or “there will be hell to pay” Canada to impose 25% tariffs on U.S. goods in retaliation for Trump’s trade measures Legal Former Philippine President Duterte arrested for crimes against humanity InfoWars reporter Jamie White killed outside Austin apartment Indiana man shot by agents after brandishing gun near White House Texas Amber Alert: Barbara Weeks, 14, missing near Dallas At least 25 killed in coordinated gang attacks in Ecuador’s largest city Health Business Elon Musk says X targeted by “massive cyberattack” amid outages SpaceX loses Starship but successfully recovers booster during test flight Trump signs executive order creating U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Facebook outage leaves users unable to access site on desktops Key Considerations for Choosing the Right Funding Source for Your Business Entertainment Menu Contact Us E-mail alerts BNO News Wire Service ENS Alerts Live feeds Advertisment1 Legal Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens dead at 99 Published on July 16, 2019 By BNO News U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens in 2006 (Credit: Supreme Court/Steve Petteway) Advertisment17 Share Tweet Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who was nominated by President Gerald Ford in the 1970s and became well-known as an independent thinker, has died in Florida after suffering a stroke, the court says. He was 99 years old. Stevens died on Tuesday night with two of his daughters by his side at Holy Cross Hospital in Fort Lauderdale, a spokeswoman for the nation’s top court said in a statement. He died of complications following a stroke he suffered on Monday. Republican U.S. President Gerald Ford nominated Stevens in 1975, at a time when the federal appeals court judge was considered to be a moderate. He later became known for his independence and was widely regarded as a liberal, voting in favor of abortion rights and limiting the use of the death penalty. Stevens retired in June 2010 after serving nearly 35 years, making him the third-longest serving justice in the court’s history. Elena Kagan was nominated to succeed him by then-President Barack Obama. Article continues below the player “A son of the Midwest heartland and a veteran of World War II, Justice Stevens devoted his long life to public service,” Chief Justice John Roberts said. “He brought to our bench an inimitable blend of kindness, humility, wisdom, and independence. His unrelenting commitment to justice has left us a better nation.” Stevens was born in Chicago on April 20, 1920. He is survived by two of his children, Elizabeth and Susan; nine grandchildren, and 13 great-grandchildren. He was preceded in death by his first wife Elizabeth, his second wife Maryan, his son John, and his daughter Kathryn. Related Topics: 2019 deaths featured Florida Fort Lauderdale (Florida) John Paul Stevens U.S. Supreme Court United States Advertisment15 Advertisment5 Latest Legal 11 mins ago Former Philippine President Duterte arrested for crimes against humanity World 1 hour ago Bus crash in southwest Mexico leaves 18 dead, over 20 injured Politics 3 hours ago Ontario imposes 25% surcharge on U.S. electricity exports amid trade tensions Legal 4 hours ago InfoWars reporter Jamie White killed outside Austin apartment Advertisment4 Trending Legal 4 hours ago InfoWars reporter Jamie White killed outside Austin apartment US News 1 week ago FedEx plane makes emergency landing at Newark Airport after bird strike Legal 3 days ago Texas Amber Alert: Barbara Weeks, 14, missing near Dallas Advertisment6 Most Viewed Legal 4 hours ago InfoWars reporter Jamie White killed outside Austin apartment US News 1 week ago FedEx plane makes emergency landing at Newark Airport after bird strike Legal 3 days ago Texas Amber Alert: Barbara Weeks, 14, missing near Dallas US News 5 days ago Magnitude 3.9 earthquake strikes Olympic Peninsula, weak shaking reported in Seattle World 5 days ago Fighter jet misfire strikes town in South Korea; at least 7 injured Legal 1 week ago Nine bodies with gunshot wounds found in vehicle in central Mexico US News 1 week ago State of emergency declared in South Carolina amid wildfires US News 1 day ago Small plane crashes into Pennsylvania residential parking lot; 5 on board injured Copyright © 2025 BNO News, B.V. All rights reserved. About Us | Privacy Policy | Terms | BNO en Español | Contact Us Advertisment18, Elon Musk's influence with Donald Trump evident in spending fight Click here for important updates to our privacy policy. Is US safer from guns? Start the day smarter ☀️ Science of snowflakes Get the USA TODAY app U.S. Politics Sports Entertainment Life Money Travel Opinion Crossword ONLY AT USA TODAY: Newsletters For Subscribers From the Archives Crossword eNewspaper Magazines Investigations Podcasts Video Humankind Just Curious Best-selling Booklist Legals OUR PORTFOLIO: 10Best USAT Wine Club Shopping Blueprint Southern Kitchen Home Internet ELECTIONS Elon Musk Add Topic 'President-elect Musk': Elon's influence on display in government spending fight Musk began posting on X against a stopgap government spending bill on Wednesday well before Trump weighed in against the legislation. Zac Anderson Josh Meyer USA TODAY Hours before Donald Trump blew up a bipartisan stopgap funding deal, putting the federal government in danger of a Christmas holiday shutdown , an influential member of his inner circle already was working hard to sink the bill. Elon Musk took to X – a social media platform he owns – to slam the spending measure, repeatedly writing that lawmakers should “kill the bill” in a tsunami of more than 100 posts on Wednesday that swamped the carefully negotiated funding measure. More: Government shutdown live updates: Congress scrambles to make deal before midnight When Trump finally weighed in , 14 hours after Musk first attacked the bill, it looked like he was following the tech impresario's lead . Political observers took notice, questioning who was setting the Republican agenda, Trump or Musk? “President-elect Musk is really setting down the marker of how he wants to run his administration. VP Trump better pay attention,” former GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger taunted Trump on X. More: When would a government shutdown occur? Here's what to know as deadline looms The government moved closer to a possible shutdown Friday after the House voted to reject a new spending bill pushed by Trump. Thirty-eight Republicans joined 197 Democrats in opposing the bill on Thursday night. The relationship between Trump and Musk − the world’s richest man − and how it will impact the next administration has been the subject of much speculation, and is coming into clearer focus with Musk’s high-profile opposition to the government funding bill. Musk endorsed Trump, campaigned with him and spent huge sums helping his campaign. Since the election, he has been a frequent visitor to Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Palm Beach estate, as he advises on the transition. More: Elon Musk contributed more than $250 million to 2024 campaign groups backing Donald Trump Trump tapped Musk and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy to lead his new Department of Government Efficiency , an advisory commission aimed at slashing government regulation and spending. Musk’s advocacy against the spending bill this week could be a sign he is interpreting that authority broadly and aggressively. If Congress can’t reach a short-term funding deal on Friday, it could result in a government shutdown over the holidays, impacting an array of federal services and employees. But Musk is focused on spending concerns. More: How Elon Musk essentially killed congressional bill preventing government shutdown House Republicans on Thursday shuffled in and out of Speaker Mike Johnson's office as the clock ticked toward the shutdown deadline. But the new spending measure they negotiated was voted down. “Either there is massive change or America goes bankrupt, therefore there must be massive change!” Musk posted on X Wednesday amid the fight over the spending legislation. More: Elon Musk and SpaceX face federal reviews over security, NYT reports Musk’s influence is frustrating for some lawmakers, but others are glad to see him weighing in. Democrats and Trump critics decried Musk’s successful effort to derail the spending bill, with some pointing to his wealth to argue he is out of touch. “The richest man in the world says he wants to shut down the government, forcing millions of American workers − including our troops − to go without pay through the holidays,” Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., whose district has many federal workers and includes the Pentagon, posted on X. “Republicans are following his orders. This is insane.” More: How Elon Musk cut costs at SpaceX, Tesla, X and what it means for DOGE A firestorm of tweets − and warnings Musk started his social media barrage at 4:17 a.m. Wednesday, with a photo of the massive budget document. “Ever seen a bigger piece of pork?” That post got 38.6 million views thanks to X algorithms that make sure everyone on the platform sees what Musk is posting. "I talked to Elon about this last night," Johnson told Fox News on Wednesday morning. "Elon, Vivek and I are on a text chain together." By noon, many GOP lawmakers and social media influencers were scrambling to fall in line. At 12:59, Musk posted: “Make sure your elected representatives know how you feel about this gigantic spending bill.” Musk’s posts and warnings were now coming minutes, or even seconds, apart. At 1:17 p.m., in a post that garnered 34.4 million views, he warned that, “Any member of the House or Senate who votes for this outrageous spending bill deserves to be voted out in two years!” “No bills should be passed Congress until January, 20, when @RealDonaldTrump takes office. None. Zero,” Musk said in a 2:13 p.m. post viewed by 42.6 million. More: Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy want Congress to reject deal that would prevent government shutdown At 3:58 p.m., after a torrent of other lawmakers pledged to support Musk’s demands, he posted, "Your elected representatives have heard you, and now the terrible bill is dead. The voice of the people has triumphed!" Trump publcly joined the bandwagon that evening, calling the bipartisan spending bill negotiated by Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson and Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries "a nasty TRAP set in place by the Radical Left Democrats!" Michael Steele, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, jabbed at Trump over Musk's role in killing the spending bill. More: Trump calls for eliminating debt ceiling amid chaos before potential government shutdown "President-elect @elonmusk feeling real good about killing the bipartisan funding bill to keep the Federal government from shutting down," Steele wrote on X, adding that Trump and Johnson must be "happy for his success. Such a strong beginning for the incoming Musk administration." But Trump transiton spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Republicans followed only one chief. "As soon as President Trump released his official stance on the CR, Republicans on Capitol Hill echoed his point of view," Leavitt said, using shorthand for the House's torpedoed continuing resolution. "President Trump is the leader of the Republican Party. Full stop." House Republicans fall into line The founder of Tesla, Space X and other businesses, Musk’s vast financial dealings have raised questions about conflicts of interest as he seeks to overhaul the federal government. Trump and others in his proposed Cabinet and broader circle of advisers have faced the same questions. Many Republicans see Musk as a powerful ally. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wi., was glad to see Musk get involved in the budget fight, saying it’s good to “have somebody in the media that can promote conservative and fiscal responsibility.” Some Republicans slammed Johnson for his approach to the funding bill and questioned whether he should remain speaker when Trump takes office. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., even floated Musk as speaker. More: Sen. Rand Paul calls for Musk to replace Speaker Johnson amidst debt ceiling debate “The Speaker of the House need not be a member of Congress…,” Paul posted on X. “Nothing would disrupt the swamp more than electing Elon Musk.” Thursday morning, Fox News anchor Stuart Varney asked Rep. Andy Barr of Kentucky about whether Musk is playing too much of a role in the budget talks. "A lot of people in Congress were looking at Musk's tweets. You were sitting there, on your phone and there were the tweets coming in. ... And you were looking at those tweets," Varney asked. "Does Musk have too much influence?" "No, I don't think so," Barr replied. "I think this is exactly what the American people voted for." Featured Weekly Ad About Us Newsroom Staff Ethical Principles Responsible Disclosure Request a Correction Press Releases Accessibility Sitemap Subscription Terms & Conditions Advertiser Acceptance Policy Terms of Service Privacy Policy Your Privacy Choices Contact Us Help Center Manage Account Give Feedback Get Home Delivery eNewspaper USA TODAY Shop USA TODAY Print Editions Licensing & Reprints Advertise With Us Careers Internships Support Local Business News Tips Submitting letters to the editor Podcasts Newsletters Mobile Apps Facebook X Instagram LinkedIn Threads YouTube Reddit Flipboard 10Best USAT Wine Club Shopping Best-selling Booklist Southern Kitchen Jobs Sports Betting Sports Weekly Studio Gannett Classifieds Home Internet Blueprint © 2025 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Satellite Information Network, LLC., Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? Accessibility help Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer Sign In Subscribe Open side navigation menu Open search bar Financial Times Subscribe Sign In Search the FT Search Close search bar Close Home World Sections World Home Middle East war Global Economy UK US China Africa Asia Pacific Emerging Markets Europe War in Ukraine Americas Middle East & North Africa Most Read Wall Street stocks tumble as investors fret over US economic slowdown Trump is making Europe great again Tanker carrying jet fuel for US Navy struck by container ship in North Sea Mark Carney to replace Trudeau as Canada’s prime minister Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates US Sections US Home US Economy Investing in America US Companies US Politics & Policy US Presidential Election 2024 Most Read Wall Street stocks tumble as investors fret over US economic slowdown Trump is making Europe great again Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates Musk claims cyber attack on social network X came from ‘Ukraine area’ Mark Carney takes on Trump’s America Companies Sections Companies Home Energy Financials Health Industrials Media Professional Services Retail & Consumer Tech Sector Telecoms Transport Most Read Tesla’s crash back towards reality, in several charts Tanker carrying jet fuel for US Navy struck by container ship in North Sea Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates KPMG to merge dozens of partnerships in overhaul of global structure Musk claims cyber attack on social network X came from ‘Ukraine area’ Tech Sections Tech Home Artificial intelligence Semiconductors Cyber Security Social Media Most Read Musk claims cyber attack on social network X came from ‘Ukraine area’ Banks and fintechs join ‘stablecoin gold rush’ OpenAI strikes $12bn deal with CoreWeave AI frenzy leads US venture capital to biggest splurge in three years Chinese investors privately take stakes in Musk’s companies Markets Sections Markets Home Alphaville Markets Data Crypto Capital Markets Commodities Currencies Equities Wealth Management Moral Money ETF Hub Fund Management Trading Most Read Wall Street stocks tumble as investors fret over US economic slowdown Tesla’s crash back towards reality, in several charts Ontario hits power exports to US with 25% surcharge as trade war escalates What will Trump mean for personal wealth? Donald Trump bets propel Michael Platt’s BlueCrest to 15% gain Climate Opinion Sections Opinion Home Columnists The FT View The Big Read Lex Obituaries Letters Most Read Trump is making Europe great again The UK’s academic recession is in full swing Mark Carney takes on Trump’s America What will Trump mean for personal wealth? The new economic stars born through crisis Lex Work & Careers Sections Work & Careers Home Business School Rankings Business Education Europe's Start-Up Hubs Entrepreneurship Recruitment Business Books Business Travel Working It Most Read The office lunch disrupters Noteworthy new books on economics The sobering new state of feminism Writing this memo does not count as one of your five things Retail’s last barbarian: the private equity group about to play hardball with Boots Life & Arts Sections Life & Arts Home Arts Books Food & Drink FT Magazine House & Home Style Puzzles Travel FT Globetrotter Most Read Champagne and Parmigiano under threat from Trump’s tariffs Chess: Oxford vs Cambridge almost level after 152 years This season’s fashion stars? Older men Lucky Boy podcast review — a life derailed by a teacher-schoolboy relationship How to read Jay Rayner’s FT restaurant reviews free for 30 days HTSI Menu Search Home World US Companies Tech Markets Climate Opinion Lex Work & Careers Life & Arts HTSI Financial Times Subscribe Sign In Search the FT Search Close search bar Close FT Podcast FT News Briefing Add to myFT Get instant alerts for this topic Manage your delivery channels here Remove from myFT Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? Elon Musk has become a powerful force in Republican politics. Not everyone is on board. Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on x (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on facebook (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on linkedin (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on x (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on facebook (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on linkedin (opens in a new window) Swamp Notes: Where does Musk fit in Maga? on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save Published January 4 2025 Jump to comments section Print this page Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free Your guide to what the 2024 US election means for Washington and the world Your browser does not support playing this file but you can still download the MP3 file to play locally. Elon Musk’s first big foray into politics was a success — he used his world-leading fortune and mass media platform to help Donald Trump regain the White House. But now, just weeks before Trump’s inauguration, some Republicans are pushing back against Musk’s influence. The FT’s Washington correspondent Joe Miller and US business and politics correspondent Alex Rogers join this week’s Swamp Notes to discuss how Musk is navigating a future in Washington. Mentioned in this podcast: Top Democrats warm to Elon Musk’s US government cost-cutting mission Elon Musk’s fight with Maga reveals split on immigration within Trump’s circle Sign up for the FT’s Swamp Notes newsletter here Swamp Notes is mixed by Samantha Giovinco and produced by Ethan Plotkin, Sonja Hutson, Lauren Fedor and Marc Filippino. Topher Forhecz is the FT’s executive producer. The FT’s global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. Special thanks to Pierre Nicholson. CREDIT: Bannons_WarRoom/X Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com View our accessibility guide . Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025 . All rights reserved. Reuse this content (opens in new window) Comments Jump to comments section Promoted Content Follow the topics in this audio US politics & policy Add to myFT Donald Trump Add to myFT Elon Musk Add to myFT FT News Briefing Add to myFT Comments Comments have not been enabled for this article. Useful links Support View Site Tips Help Centre Contact Us About Us Accessibility myFT Tour Careers Suppliers Legal & Privacy Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Manage Cookies Copyright Slavery Statement & Policies Services Share News Tips Securely Individual Subscriptions Professional Subscriptions Republishing Executive Job Search Advertise with the FT Follow the FT on X FT Channels FT Schools Tools Portfolio FT App FT Digital Edition FT Edit Alerts Hub Business School Rankings Subscription Manager News feed Newsletters Currency Converter Community & Events FT Live Events FT Forums Board Director Programme More from the FT Group Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2025. FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd. The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice . Close side navigation menu Edition: International UK Search the FT Search Subscribe for full access Top sections Home World Show more World Middle East war Global Economy UK US China Africa Asia Pacific Emerging Markets Europe War in Ukraine Americas Middle East & North Africa US Show more US US Economy Investing in America US Companies US Politics & Policy US Presidential Election 2024 Companies Show more Companies Energy Financials Health Industrials Media Professional Services Retail & Consumer Tech Sector Telecoms Transport Tech Show more Tech Artificial intelligence Semiconductors Cyber Security Social Media Markets Show more Markets Alphaville Markets Data Crypto Capital Markets Commodities Currencies Equities Wealth Management Moral Money ETF Hub Fund Management Trading Climate Opinion Show more Opinion Columnists The FT View The Big Read Lex Obituaries Letters Lex Work & Careers Show more Work & Careers Business School Rankings Business Education Europe's Start-Up Hubs Entrepreneurship Recruitment Business Books Business Travel Working It Life & Arts Show more Life & Arts Arts Books Food & Drink FT Magazine House & Home Style Puzzles Travel FT Globetrotter Personal Finance Show more Personal Finance Property & Mortgages Investments Pensions Tax Banking & Savings Advice & Comment Next Act HTSI Special Reports FT recommends Alphaville FT Edit Lunch with the FT FT Globetrotter #techAsia Moral Money Visual and data journalism Newsletters Video Podcasts News feed FT Schools FT Live Events FT Forums Board Director Programme myFT Portfolio FT Digital Edition Crossword Our Apps Help Centre Subscribe Sign In, source_sentence: Bills targeting LGBTQ Americans are gaining momentum, advocates say | CNN CNN values your feedback 1. How relevant is this ad to you? 2. Did you encounter any technical issues? Video player was slow to load content Video content never loaded Ad froze or did not finish loading Video content did not start after ad Audio on ad was too loud Other issues Ad never loaded Ad prevented/slowed the page from loading Content moved around while ad loaded Ad was repetitive to ads I've seen previously Other issues Cancel Submit Thank You! Your effort and contribution in providing this feedback is much appreciated. Close Ad Feedback Close icon US Crime + Justice More Crime + Justice Watch Listen Live TV Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Live TV Listen Watch Edition US International Arabic Espa√±ol Edition US International Arabic Espa√±ol Crime + Justice Follow CNN US Crime + Justice World Africa Americas Asia Australia China Europe India Middle East United Kingdom Politics SCOTUS Congress Facts First 2024 Elections Business Tech Media Calculators Videos Markets Pre-markets After-Hours Fear & Greed Investing Markets Now Nightcap Health Life, But Better Fitness Food Sleep Mindfulness Relationships Entertainment Movies Television Celebrity Tech Innovate Foreseeable Future Mission: Ahead Work Transformed Innovative Cities Style Arts Design Fashion Architecture Luxury Beauty Video Travel Destinations Food & Drink Stay Videos Sports Pro Football College Football Basketball Baseball Soccer Olympics Hockey Science Space Life Unearthed Climate Solutions Weather Weather Video Climate Ukraine-Russia War Israel-Hamas War Watch Live TV CNN Headlines CNN Shorts Shows A-Z CNN10 CNN Max CNN TV Schedules FlashDocs Listen CNN 5 Things Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta The Assignment with Audie Cornish One Thing Tug of War CNN Political Briefing The Axe Files All There Is with Anderson Cooper All CNN Audio podcasts CNN Underscored Electronics Fashion Beauty Health & Fitness Home Reviews Deals Gifts Travel Outdoors Pets Games CNN Crossword Jumble Crossword Photo Shuffle Sudoblock Sudoku 5 Things Quiz About CNN Subscribe Photos Investigations CNN Profiles CNN Leadership CNN Newsletters Work for CNN Ad Feedback More states are proposing bills targeting LGBTQ rights. ‚ÄòIt‚Äôs only getting worse,‚Äô advocate says By Nicole Chavez and Jalen Brown , CNN 6 minute read Updated 7:39 AM EST, Thu March 9, 2023 Link Copied! Heather Thomas and her son, Ellis. courtesy Heather Thomas CNN — Heather Thomas spent months pleading with Tennessee legislators to vote against a ban on gender-affirming health care for minors, which she says saved the life of her transgender son. ‚ÄúIt‚Äôs just so important. I mean, it saved his life. Why would I not share that to try to help others not have to go through what we went through?‚Äù Thomas told CNN. Even when many parents in Tennessee became afraid they would become targets of the bill, Thomas continued speaking out. But despite her efforts, including testifying before the state Senate, last week Tennessee became the latest state to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth and the first state this year to restrict public drag show performances . Thomas, as well as transgender people and advocates in multiple states, told CNN they are increasingly alarmed about the unprecedented number of measures introduced in state legislatures this year that are seeking to restrict LGBTQ rights and queer life . People gather in support of transgender youth during a rally at the Utah State Capitol Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2023, in Salt Lake City. Utah lawmakers on Friday, Jan. 27, 2023, gave final approval for a measure that would ban most transgender youth from receiving gender-affirming health care like surgery or puberty blockers. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer) Rick Bowmer/AP/FILE Related article GOP lawmakers escalate fight against gender-affirming care with bills seeking to expand the scope of bans ‚ÄúMy child doesn‚Äôt want to be transgender; he‚ÄØis‚ÄØtransgender and has been his whole life. So just because he transitioned doesn‚Äôt mean he wasn‚Äôt trans before. He always has been,‚Äù said Thomas, adding that her 23-year-old son Ellis lived with severe depression before starting testosterone treatments as a teenager. At least 385 bills targeting LGBTQ rights and queer life have been introduced around the country through March 7, according to data compiled by the American Civil Liberties Union. The number of bills has already surpassed last year‚Äôs total of 306, according to ACLU data shared with CNN. The proposed bills cover a wide range of policies, including some that seek to restrict transgender people from competing on sports teams or using bathrooms that align with their gender identity, but it appears youth and medical care is a growing legislative focus. Youth who identify as transgender make up a tiny fraction of kids in the United States ‚Äì the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated in a 2019 study that less than 2% of high school students identify as transgender. Health care professionals have said the types of bills being pushed in this Republican-led effort are likely to further ostracize transgender kids, a group who already struggle with higher rates of depression, anxiety and suicide . closeup of a transgender pride flag waving on the blue sky, moved by the wind, with the sun in the background Shutterstock Related article Gender-affirming care, a 'crucial' process for thousands of young people in America Emerson J. Sykes, an attorney for the ACLU, said each of the issues potentially impacted by the bills are distinct, but are creating a ‚Äúdramatic chilling effect‚Äù even if they don‚Äôt become laws. ‚ÄúThe message is loud and clear: LGBTQ people ‚Äì trans people in particular ‚Äì are under a microscope and anybody who supports or uplifts or features transgender people or voices of any kind, whether that‚Äôs in schools, in libraries, on stages or even just existing in the world, and getting access to health care and recreation and all of those basic things,‚Äù Sykes said. ‚ÄúWe are definitely in protection mode and trying to figure out what we could do to protect our neighbors and their rights,‚Äù he added. In Oklahoma, one of the states with the most proposed bills targeting health care for LGBTQ people (15 so far, according to the ACLU), Juno Stump said she is worried about her future as a transgender woman. Last week, House Bill 2177 advanced to the state Senate after the House passed it 80-18. The measure would ban certain gender-affirming care like puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries for people under 18 years and blocks insurance from covering gender-affirming care for anyone, regardless of age. Oklahoma Rep. Kevin West, the bill‚Äôs sponsor, has said legislation restricting gender-affirming care is about protecting children and ‚Äúputting a safeguard in place‚Äù for them. ‚ÄúThis legislation is about protecting our children from those who would seek to profit from their gender confusion,‚Äù West said in a statement following the House vote. ‚ÄúAs a state, we must not be partner to irreversible health practices that permanently change the bodies of our children before they are of an age where they can fully understand the consequences of their decisions.‚Äù Juno Stump told CNN she is worried about her future as a transgender woman. courtesy Juno Stump Under HB 2177, Stump, a 31-year-old freelance writer, says she would no longer be able to use her health insurance to pay for her gender-affirming care. She told CNN it would cost ‚Äúthousands‚Äù to travel to another state and buy her medication without insurance. When Stump first heard that HB 2177 had advanced to the Senate, she was devastated. ‚ÄúI broke and fell apart into pieces in my friend‚Äôs arms in the middle of the day, and then in my wife‚Äôs arms ‚Ä¶ because it just felt so hopeless,‚Äù Stump said. ‚ÄúBecause anything I can think of that makes me feel better, is temporary, because it‚Äôs like, well, when does this stop? When does this end?‚Äù Stump said she suffered from depression and harmed herself for several years before she started receiving gender-affirming care in 2021. Receiving hormones changed her life, Stump said, because it freed her from having to ‚Äúmask‚Äù by presenting herself as a cis-gendered, heterosexual man. ‚ÄúEvery single time I took a step, every single time I took a breath, every single time I said anything, I had to have this quick little conversation inside my own head ‚Ä¶ and that conversation was, ‚ÄòIs this coming across in a way that is masculine and going to help me pass as a boy?‚Äô Because that‚Äôs what I‚Äôm being forced to do,‚Äù Stump said. New York Attorney General Letitia James is leading a coalition of 16 Democratic attorneys general urging Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to rescind his administration's request to colleges in the state for information about students receiving gender-affirming care. Getty Images Related article Democratic AGs condemn DeSantis administration for asking Florida colleges for information on students receiving gender-affirming care Nicole McAfee, the executive director of LGBTQ advocacy group Freedom Oklahoma, said young LGBTQ people in the state were already feeling the harm and burden of policies targeting them and now, ‚Äúit‚Äôs only getting worse.‚Äù The recent push to restrict gender-affirming care in Oklahoma began last year when Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed a law that blocks funding to the University Hospitals Authority if its facilities provide gender-affirming care. At the time, the governor also called on state lawmakers to ban gender-affirming care for minors across the state during the 2023 legislative session. Last year, Stitt signed laws that require students at public schools to use restrooms and locker rooms that match the sex listed on their birth certificates , banned transgender women and girls from competing on sports teams consistent with their gender identity and banned nonbinary gender markers on birth certificates. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signs a bill on March 30, 2022, that prevents transgender girls and women from competing on female sports teams. Sean Murphy/AP/FILE Stitt has argued these laws are for the benefit of children, calling out gender-affirming health care in his 2023 state of the state address: ‚ÄúWe must protect our most vulnerable - our children.‚Äù In banning funding for such health care for minors at the Oklahoma Children‚Äôs Hospital, the governor said it was ‚Äúwildly inappropriate for taxpayer dollars to be used‚Äù for these procedures. McAfee says the chilling effect of bills like HB 2177 would impact more than just transgender people. Some providers would be worried about being criminalized or being impacted by civil liability for providing care, they said. ‚ÄúThat means we‚Äôre going to lose doctors, we‚Äôre going to lose pediatricians, all who treat all children, not just children who are transgender. And in a state like Oklahoma, where we already have a really fractured health care system, adults and kids of all genders are going to suffer because of this legislation,‚Äù McAfee said. Alabama Governor Kay Ivey delivers her State of the State Address at the State Capitol Building in Montgomery, Ala., on Tuesday evening January 11, 2022. Mickey Welsh/Advertiser/USA Today Network/Reuters Related article Lawsuit filed against Alabama over law that makes it a felony to administer gender-affirming health care to minors Stump, Thomas and other advocates told CNN they were astonished and disappointed that more people outside the LGTBQ community are not alarmed by what lawmakers are doing or encouraged to act against the growing wave of bills against them. ‚ÄúI really wish that more people cared ‚Ä¶ at least for self-preservation,‚Äù Stump said, ‚ÄúBecause right now I‚Äôm on the chopping block, but, people in power aren‚Äôt gonna get rid of me and then all of a sudden start trying to fix roads and fix health care and, you know, fix the cost of food ‚Äì they‚Äôre just gonna look for the next person,‚Äù Stump said. CNN‚Äôs Lucy Kafanov contributed to this report. Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Live TV Listen Watch US Crime + Justice World Africa Americas Asia Australia China Europe India Middle East United Kingdom Politics SCOTUS Congress Facts First 2024 Elections Business Tech Media Calculators Videos Markets Pre-markets After-Hours Fear & Greed Investing Markets Now Nightcap Health Life, But Better Fitness Food Sleep Mindfulness Relationships Entertainment Movies Television Celebrity Tech Innovate Foreseeable Future Mission: Ahead Work Transformed Innovative Cities Style Arts Design Fashion Architecture Luxury Beauty Video Travel Destinations Food & Drink Stay News Videos Sports Pro Football College Football Basketball Baseball Soccer Olympics Hockey Science Space Life Unearthed Climate Solutions Weather Weather Video Climate Ukraine-Russia War Israel-Hamas War Watch Live TV CNN Headlines CNN Shorts Shows A-Z CNN10 CNN Max CNN TV Schedules FlashDocs Listen CNN 5 Things Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta The Assignment with Audie Cornish One Thing Tug of War CNN Political Briefing The Axe Files All There Is with Anderson Cooper All CNN Audio podcasts CNN Underscored Electronics Fashion Beauty Health & Fitness Home Reviews Deals Gifts Travel Outdoors Pets Games CNN Crossword Jumble Crossword Photo Shuffle Sudoblock Sudoku 5 Things Quiz About CNN Subscribe Photos Investigations CNN Profiles CNN Leadership CNN Newsletters Work for CNN US Watch Listen Live TV Follow CNN Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Terms of Use Privacy Policy Ad Choices Accessibility & CC About Subscribe Newsletters Transcripts Help Center © 2025 Cable News Network. A Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All Rights Reserved. CNN Sans ‚Ñ¢ & ¬© 2016 Cable News Network.
sentences: Musk Was the Top US Political Donor in 2024: Filings | The Epoch Times Open sidebar AD Support Us SHARE US US Politics Transition of Power Musk Was the Top US Political Donor in 2024: Filings Elon Musk, a top ally of President-elect Donald Trump, was also the largest outside supporter of his presidential campaign by way of his America PAC. Copy Facebook X Truth Gettr LinkedIn Telegram Email Save Elon Musk in Washington on Nov. 13, 2024. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images By Austin Alonzo 12/6/2024 Updated: 12/7/2024 Print X 1 0:00 According to new financial disclosures, in a late-cycle push, Elon Musk edged out Timothy Mellon as the largest individual donor to politicians seeking federal office in 2024. On Dec. 5, federal committees registered with the Federal Election Commission issued their so-called post-general reports covering their financial activities from Oct. 17 through Nov. 25. The filings showed Musk, who has gained a position of high influence in President-elect Donald Trump’s circle, donated more than $238.5 million to a super political action committee backing Trump’s candidacy for the White House in 2024. That total put Musk ahead of Mellon, an heir to the Mellon family fortune, who was a major donor to the Make America Great Again Inc. super PAC. MAGA Inc. was a prominent ally of Trump in his run for office. Mellon also sponsored a group supporting Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s independent candidacy, American Values 2024, in 2023 and 2024. Mellon contributed about $197 million in the 2023–2024 election cycle, according to the Money in Politics watchdog organization OpenSecrets. Musk founded the super PAC America PAC, according to its website. The organization’s main goals are strong borders, safe cities, free speech, sensible spending, a fair justice system, and self-protection. According to its most recent FEC filing, America PAC spent more than $249.9 million in 2024. Independent expenditure reports attached to the Dec. 5 filing said America PAC spent its money on printing, postage, phone calls, text messages, digital media, canvassing, and field operations largely to boost Trump and oppose the Democratic Party’s candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris. Smaller expenditures were directed toward helping Republicans in races for the House and Senate. Related Stories Musk, Ramaswamy Meet With Top Republicans on Capitol Hill 12/5/2024 With DOGE, Musk, Ramaswamy Confront the ‘Immovable Object’ 12/5/2024 Musk and the PAC attracted considerable media attention by giving away $1 million per day to registered voters who signed a petition supporting free speech and the right to bear arms in the run-up to the election. The $1 million check promotion also drew attention from both the U.S. Department of Justice and Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, who attempted to block the gifts by accusing the PAC of running an illegal lottery. That effort was ultimately blocked on Nov. 4 by a judge from the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. In November, Musk vowed to continue the PAC’s political activities in the coming midterm elections and direct its resources toward smaller local races. Musk is believed to be among the wealthiest men in the world. Forbes estimates his worth at more than $347 billion. He is the founder and CEO of Tesla Inc. and Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Since the Nov. 5 federal election, Musk has spent much time in Trump’s transitional government organization and is reportedly speaking with foreign leaders and weighing in on cabinet picks. Musk, along with fellow Trump ally Vivek Ramaswamy, is leading a nongovernmental advisory group called the Department of Government Efficiency, which aims to slash federal spending. In addition to his support of America PAC, Musk donated to three other groups in 2024—the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), the Calvert Victory Fund, and the Early Vote Action PAC, according to FEC records. The NRCC is a group dedicated to electing Republicans to the House. The Calvert Victory Fund was a group devoted to reelecting Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.). The Early Vote Action PAC, according to its most recent FEC filing, paid various individuals for “field strategy consulting.” Additionally, a group registered to a PO Box in Austin, Texas, called the “Elon Musk Revocable Trust,” sent $20.5 million to the super PAC RBG PAC on Oct. 24, according to federal records. According to its independent expenditure reports, the group supported Trump. Share this article Share this article Leave a comment Austin Alonzo Reporter Austin Alonzo covers U.S. political and national news for The Epoch Times. He has covered local, business and agricultural news in Kansas City, Missouri, since 2012. He is a graduate of the University of Missouri. You can reach Austin via email at [email protected] Author’s Selected Articles Why the US Continues to Kill Millions of Hens, 4 Years Into Bird Flu Outbreak Mar 10, 2025 Why Aren’t Chicken Meat Prices Rising Like Egg Prices? Feb 27, 2025 Rollins Pitches Five-Point Plan to Address High Egg Prices Feb 26, 2025 Coinbase Leadership Says SEC Will Drop Its Lawsuit Against the Exchange Feb 21, 2025 Comment Save Share Copyright © 2000 - 2025 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved., Tokyo pro-life march and Asia’s dark history of eugenics - Asia Times Want to comment on Asia Times stories? Sign up here Sign in with Google Or Sign up Sign in to an existing account Thank you for registering! An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link. Close Sign In Search for: Search China Southeast Asia Military Northeast Asia Business Open dropdown menu Trade Finance Technology World Open dropdown menu United States US-China South Asia Middle East Ukraine War Opinion Membership Open dropdown menu My account Our Subscription offers AT+ Premium Access Help Asia Times Survive Newsletters Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS Close Skip to content Support Asia Times Keep independent journalism alive Support us Asia Times Covering geo-political news and current affairs across Asia Sign In Menu Sign In China Southeast Asia Military Northeast Asia Business Open dropdown menu Trade Finance Technology World Open dropdown menu United States US-China South Asia Middle East Ukraine War Opinion Membership Open dropdown menu My account Our Subscription offers AT+ Premium Access Help Asia Times Survive Newsletters Open Search Search for: Search Posted in AT Finance , Bangladesh , China , France , Hong Kong , India , Indonesia , Japan , Northeast Asia , Oceania , Pakistan , Philippines , South Asia , South Korea , Taiwan , Thailand , World Tokyo pro-life march and Asia’s dark history of eugenics Abortions were once common in Japan, many aimed at cutting down the number of mixed race children, but things have changed by Jason Morgan July 26, 2018 February 18, 2020 Click to share on X (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Click to print (Opens in new window) Pro-life marchers in Tokyo braved heat and indifference. Photo: Neil Day It was a small rally, but a determined one. Amid the blistering July afternoon sunshine, in the face of puzzled onlookers, approximately 250 people braved Tokyo’s heat to march from Tsukiji to Hibiya Park. Carrying banners, signs and fans, the sweat-soaked marchers wound their way past high-rises and the old wooden shops of Chūō Ward, flanked by a handful of policemen in starched blue uniforms directing traffic with tasseled white batons. There was a matsuri , or festival, atmosphere. Some marchers held aloft a festooned statue of the Virgin Mary, while singing in Portuguese and Japanese. The “March for Life” though, now in its fifth consecutive year, remains an oddity in Japan. Begun in 2014 by Japanese Catholic activist Masaaki Ikeda after attending the March for Life in Washington, the Tokyo event, though small in numbers, stands out for its cosmopolitan character. At an informal rally outside the Tsukiji Catholic Church before setting off, Ikeda asked where marchers were from. Ireland, Taiwan, India, Argentina, the Philippines, Peru, American Samoa, the United States, Colombia, Hong Kong, South Korea, Costa Rica, France and Brazil were just some of the replies. Masaaki Ikeda, the organizer of the Tokyo March for Life, addresses marchers at the Tsukiji Catholic Church. Photo: Neil Day Pastor Kenzō Tsujioka, who was instrumental in publicizing and organizing the march during the earliest days when only a couple of dozen people took part, encourages marchers to smile and avoid confrontations. Dr Ligaya Acosta, the regional director for Asia and Oceania at pro-life powerhouse Human Life International, attended the Tokyo march for the first time this year. According to her, it is an opportunity to unite across national borders in defense of the natural dignity of humans. Joe Woodard, a pro-life leader based in Hong Kong, agrees that the march is emerging as a key human rights event for Asia. Friendly smiles, dark history The friendly demeanor of Japan’s pro-life movement contrasts with Asia’s dark history of eugenics – policies designed to improve the genetic quality of the population – sterilization, racial politics and widespread governmental population control. Latest stories Europe-NATO scramble for a ‘coalition of the willing’ for Ukraine Abandoned by Trump, Ukraine still has the insurgency card Ukraine mineral deal is no US security guarantee During the 1930s and early 1940s, Tokyo needed as many people as possible to colonize Taiwan, the Korean peninsula and Manchuria, work in the factories and at home and man the army as the government enacted expansive and aggressive policies. At a time when the infant mortality rate was high, multiple births were encouraged. But with Japan’s 1945 defeat, and the subsequent loss of her overseas empire, Tokyo shifted from inflationary biopolitics to biopolitical austerity. Hundreds of thousands of women began streaming back to the home islands – many of whom had been raped by Soviet or Chinese soldiers, or by Korean men. Abortions would become the order of the day. This hidden history is only now coming to light. In a new book on an evacuee repatriation center in Hakata, author Masaharu Shimokawa mines contemporary diaries and records to show how Sei’ichi Izumi– the archaeologist who would later become famous for his discoveries of Incan religious sites in the Andes – personally arranged for doctors and nurses to assemble in Fukuoka and perform hundreds of abortions on rape victims. There is even evidence that Prince Takamatsu approved these emergency measures. The biopolitical history of occupation But the threat to Japan’s “racial purity” was becoming permanent at home. Rapes were a never-ending source of tension between US occupation forces and Japanese authorities. The Japanese government, at the request of the Americans, opened special “Recreation and Amusement Authority” (RAA) centers – essentially, licensed brothels like the now-infamous “comfort stations” provided for Japanese forces during the war. Yet mixed-race children continued to appear, both from rape and from fraternization. The occupation press code prohibited Japanese media from reporting on crimes committed by the US military, but American brass were plagued by how to cover up evidence of rape. A solution was hit upon: the infamous 1948 Eugenics Protection Law. This law was the first to recognize the legal right to abortion, although only in “exceptional cases” – a clause which could be taken to mean abortion on demand, without restriction. The Japanese government got to keep their population racially pure; the American government got to minimize the negative publicity of thousands of mixed-race babies. The Eugenics Protection Law was, in effect, a complement to the laws and rules already in place prohibiting American servicemen from marrying Japanese women and bringing them back to the United States. Japan: Abortion capital of the world Subsequently, women from across the globe flocked to Japan for abortions. In 1954, for example, the abortion rate in Japan for women of all nationalities was an astounding 64.6%; the abortion rate for Japanese women for 1955 was a very high 40.3%. It remained at that level or higher throughout the rest of the 1950s. The eugenics mentality remained strong in Japan for decades. Government guidelines in 1960 advocated teaching “national eugenics” at high schools. Guidelines for 1970 still contained recommendations for “marriage eugenics.” A law allowing forced sterilizations for mentally handicapped women was not revised until 1996 , and cases from the age of eugenics continue to work through the court system in Japan today . Population control: ‘One child’ China Japan’s attitudes toward abortion changed slowly in the 1960s and ’70s, due largely to the efforts of Dr Noboru Kikuta (1926-1991). Kikuta had been a prolific abortionist before undergoing a religious conversion at the hands of March for Life’s Tsujioka. After Kikuta stopped performing abortions, he started helping place orphaned children into adoptive homes by forging household registry paperwork. He eventually took his fight public, helping to change public opinion about adoption while highlighting its high rate. Sign up for one of our free newsletters The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories Sign up The international makeup of marchers reveals that many countries in the region and beyond have their own histories of biopolitics and population control – histories entangled with American biopolitics. For example, the 1974 Kissinger Report , formulated by the CIA and other American government agencies, called for population control, including abortion and sterilization, in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines and a half-dozen other countries outside of Asia. There is a grassroots effort in the Philippines today to overturn the policies and laws implemented with money and influence from the US government operating under the Kissinger Report. Yet even this was dwarfed in scale by what may be the biggest population-control experiment in world history: China’s “one child” policy, which is estimated to have resulted in some 336 million abortions. Pro-life marchers in Tokyo were small in number, but cosmopolitan in makeup. Photo: Neil Day Given the long history of foreign interference in Asian biopolitics, it is significant that countries throughout Asia are reforming their approaches to abortion. From the Philippines to South Korea and beyond, a new democratic movement is challenging the status quo and speaking up in favor of national sovereignty. Birth rates throughout the industrialized world continue to plummet, but if Tokyo’s March for Life is any indication, there is a response brewing outside the halls of government that may end up overturning nearly a century of American-led biopolitical interventions. Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories Sign in with Google Or Sign up Sign in to an existing account Thank you for registering! An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link. Click to share on X (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Click to print (Opens in new window) Tagged: Abortion , China , Economy , Japan , One child policy , Politics , Southeast Asia , Sport 3 replies on “Tokyo pro-life march and Asia’s dark history of eugenics” Vic Mason says: July 27, 2018 at 7:21 PM A book by a survivor of what transpired once Japan surrendered: https://www.amazon.com/Bamboo-Grove-Yoko-Kawashima-Watkins/dp/0688131158 Akira Yasui says: July 27, 2018 at 1:11 AM After the end of WW2,Russia started invading the Kuril Islands in Japan and they raped many Japanese women there. And quite a large number of Japanese women living in Korea were raped by Korean men after the war. Kenji Kuwata says: July 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM http://www.imxprs.com/free/korean_lover/japan-broke-korean-custom Comments are closed. AT+ Premium stories Developing Asia in a Trump-tariff, China-dumping squeeze Japan’s Astroscale transforms into defense contractor Trump tariffs could be bargaining chip or economic bomb Asia easing fast and furious against Trump’s tariffs Alibaba making China tech investible again Trump tariffs driving UK-Japan trade ties No friends, only foes in Trump’s trade war onslaught Musk’s politics taking a toll on troubled Tesla Behind China’s ‘secret’ laser facility Japan’s upbeat GDP surprise won’t likely last long Top trending stories China 'mass produces' semiconductor-related papers Can China keep winning without fighting? Trump ideology looking a lot like 1960s China Trump trade wars making stagflation great again Ukraine says it wants to negotiate 'peace framework' in Riyadh US eyes fighter drones to contain China's surging air power Investor beware of robust European defense spending Noose tightens as Europe confronts its dependence on US technology China in Africa: Footprint maps mislead while real risks rise Australia's economy has finally turned the corner Military & Security US eyes Euro-Japanese next-gen fighter program March 5, 2025 With US military aid cut, Ukraine prepares to fight alone March 4, 2025 US bets on F/A-XX as China air power races ahead March 3, 2025 New US missile aims to pierce China’s rising air power March 1, 2025 China explores military applications with DeepSeek March 1, 2025 China’s live-fire flex shows Australia is no naval match February 28, 2025 China puts Philippines on hypersonic nuke alert February 25, 2025 Tired of the gaslighting? The mainstream media told you Economic sanctions would kill the Russian economy US tech sanctions would shut down China’s semiconductor industry Russia is taking massive casualties in Ukraine and will have to negotiate China’s property market will collapse its economy And so on, every day and in every major news outlet. The facts didn’t support the gaslighting. When the facts are clear, Asia Times gives you the facts; when they are controversial, Asia Times gives you the controversy. We urgently need your support to keep on doing so. Independent, fact-based, unbiased journalism needs YOU to stay alive. If you decide to back Asia Times, please choose a monthly, annual, or one-time payment. One-time Monthly Annually One-time $20 $50 $100 Other Donation amount $ Monthly $5 $8 $25 Other Donation amount per month $ Annually $25 $50 $150 Other Donation amount per year $ Your contribution is appreciated. Donate Now Not ready to support today? Remind me later Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS About Us Contact Us Write for us FAQ Terms of Service Support Asia Times Keep free journalism alive Support us © 2025 Covering geopolitical news and current affairs across Asia Powered by Newspack Privacy Policy Sign in Close Sign in with Google Or Enter the code sent to your email. Email address Enter your password Sign in by entering the code we sent to , or clicking the magic link in the email. Continue Resend code Email me a one-time code instead Forgot password Create an account Sign in to an existing account Go back Continue Set a password (optional) Complete your transaction Close, Trump Would Veto A National Abortion Ban: Vance | ZeroHedge Home Join Premium Contributors Channels All Partners The Market Ear SpotGamma Store Donate More RSS About Advertise Debates Zerohedge Debates ZeroHedge Reads Alt-Market AntiWar.com Bitcoin Magazine Bombthrower BULLIONSTAR Capitalist Exploits Christophe Barraud Dollar Collapse Dr. Housing Bubble Financial Revolutionist ForexLive Gains Pains & Capital Gefira GMG Research Gold Core Implode-Explode Insider Paper Liberty Blitzkrieg Max Keiser Mises Institute Mish Talk Newsquawk Of Two Minds Oil Price Open The Books Peter Schiff Portfolio Armor QTR’s Fringe Finance Safehaven Slope of Hope SpotGamma TF Metals Report The Automatic Earth The Burning Platform The Economic Populist The Libertarian Institute Themis Trading Thoughtful Money Value Walk Visual Combat Banzai7 Wolf Street Expand Trump Would Veto A National Abortion Ban: Vance by Tyler Durden Authored... Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times, Presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump would, if elected, veto a national abortion ban, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) said on Aug. 25. “If you’re not supporting it as the president of the United States, you fundamentally have to veto it,” Vance, Trump’s running mate, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” The president can sign or veto a piece of legislation that reaches his desk after being approved by both chambers of Congress. Members can override a veto. That requires two-thirds of the House of Representatives and two-thirds of the Senate. The Republican vice presidential nominee said a Trump–Vance administration would not impose a national ban on abortion. “I can absolutely commit that, ” he said. “Donald Trump I think has staked his position and made it very explicit,” Vance added later. “He wants this to be a state decision, states are going to make this determination themselves.” Trump has not said explicitly that he would veto abortion ban legislation, but he has said that abortion restrictions should be left up to states. “Many people have asked me what my position is on abortion and abortion rights,” the former president said in a video on social media earlier this year. “My view is now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint, the states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both.” Trump supported the U.S. Supreme Court in overturning its own precedent established in Roe v. Wade, which concluded that access to abortion was a constitutional right. The justices, including three appointed by Trump, ruled in 2022 that this conclusion was erroneous. The ruling also reversed a 1992 Supreme Court decision that had prevented states from imposing significant restrictions on abortion before a fetus could survive outside the womb. The ruling was “only made possible because I delivered everything as promised, including nominating and getting three highly respected and strong Constitutionalists confirmed to the United States Supreme Court,” Trump wrote on his platform, Truth Social, at the time. “It was my great honor to do so!” Vance said on NBC that Trump “wants to end this culture war over this particular topic” and that “Trump’s view is that we want the individual states, and their individual cultures, and their unique political sensibilities to make these decisions because we don’t want to have a nonstop federal conflict over this issue.” Instead, the federal government “ought to be focused on getting food prices down, getting housing prices down,” Vance said. Vice President Kamala Harris, who is running against Trump, has told voters that Trump supports a federal ban on abortion. “Trump hand-picked three members of the Supreme Court because he intended for them to overturn Roe v Wade—as he intended, they did,” she wrote on the social media platform X recently. “If he is re-elected, we know he will sign a national abortion ban. As president, I will restore reproductive freedom.” Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said on X, “God have mercy on this nation if this is now the position of what was the Pro-Life Party.” Trump, meanwhile, took to social media on Aug. 23 to say that his second term “will be great for women and their reproductive rights.” He told reporters hours later, at an event in Las Vegas, that he is “very strong on women’s reproductive rights,” including access to in vitro fertilization. 0 Loading... Sign Up For ZH Premium Today's Top Stories Contact Information + Assistance and Requests: Contact Us Tips: tips@zerohedge.com General: info@zerohedge.com Legal: legal@zerohedge.com Advertising: Contact Us Abuse/Complaints: abuse@zerohedge.com Suggested Reading + Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide It would be very wise of you to study our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure . Here's our Cookie Policy . How to report offensive comments Notice on Racial Discrimination . Discrimination Notice Privacy Policy Disclosure Disclaimer Privacy and cookie settings Advertise with ZeroHedge Copyright ©2009- 2025 ZeroHedge.com/ABC Media, LTD, source_sentence: How Elon Musk stands to benefit from Trump's 2024 election : NPR Accessibility links Skip to main content Keyboard shortcuts for audio player Open Navigation Menu Newsletters NPR Shop Close Navigation Menu Home News Expand/collapse submenu for News National World Politics Business Health Science Climate Race Culture Expand/collapse submenu for Culture Books Movies Television Pop Culture Food Art & Design Performing Arts Life Kit Gaming Music Expand/collapse submenu for Music All Songs Considered Tiny Desk New Music Friday Music Features Live Sessions Podcasts & Shows Expand/collapse submenu for Podcasts & Shows Daily Morning Edition Weekend Edition Saturday Weekend Edition Sunday All Things Considered Fresh Air Up First Featured Embedded The NPR Politics Podcast Throughline Trump's Terms More Podcasts & Shows Search Newsletters NPR Shop All Songs Considered Tiny Desk New Music Friday Music Features Live Sessions About NPR Diversity Support Careers Press Ethics How Elon Musk stands to benefit from Trump's 2024 election The billionaire businessman has spent weeks campaigning relentlessly for Donald Trump. That dedication could lead to major benefits for him and his companies. Business < With Trump's win, Elon Musk stands to benefit November 7, 2024 3:56 PM ET Musk and Trump Listen · 4:46 4:46 Transcript Toggle more options Download Embed Embed < iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/nx-s1-5182280/nx-s1-5250576-1" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player"> Transcript SCOTT SIMON, HOST: President-elect Donald Trump gave a special shoutout during his victory speech this week to the billionaire who has companies that make electric cars and shoot for the stars, Elon Musk. (SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING) DONALD TRUMP: Do we have a new star? A star is born - Elon. SIMON: Of course, Elon Musk is the richest man in the world. He owns several companies that could benefit from Trump's presidency. NPR's tech reporter Dara Kerr joins us. Dara, thanks for being with us. DARA KERR, BYLINE: Of course. Nice to be here. SIMON: We've seen this relationship grow right in front of our eyes. How did it get started? KERR: Elon Musk has been a supporter of Trump for a while. But it was really in July when things got revved up, right after that first assassination attempt on Trump. Almost immediately, Musk posted on his social media platform, X, I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery. And that's when the bromance between the two of them really took off. Musk started deeply fundraising for Trump and posting more and more pro-Trump content on X. At the same time, he was criticizing Vice President Kamala Harris. And in the last few weeks, Musk hit the campaign trail, speaking at Trump's rallies. In all, Musk has donated more than $100 million of his personal money to the campaign. And this has really earned him what seems to be a very close relationship with the president-elect. SIMON: And, in addition to the benefits of friendship, what else could flow from this relationship? KERR: It really boils down to all of the companies that Musk owns. Besides X, he has Tesla and SpaceX, the rocket company. He has Starlink, which is a satellite internet company, and even more. And many of these companies rely on government grants and subsidies. Tesla, for example, has gotten millions in government funding to install EV charging stations, and SpaceX has been awarded billion-dollar contracts from NASA for missions to the moon. And so now there's some fears that he can get more contracts or that he may face less government scrutiny. I spoke to Gita Johar. She's a professor at the Columbia Business School. GITA JOHAR: I think the government contracts could be given without much oversight to Musk, whether it's for SpaceX or whether it is for his satellite links, and that's lack of regulation, lack of oversight, all of which will serve to benefit Musk. KERR: I should say the Trump campaign, representatives from SpaceX and X and Musk himself did not respond to our request for comment. Just yesterday, Trump had a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and several major news outlets have reported that Musk was also on the call, though NPR has not independently confirmed those reports. Musk's satellite company, Starlink, has played a big role in providing internet access to Ukraine during the war. SIMON: And, of course, didn't Donald Trump mention that he might put Elon Musk on some government commission? KERR: Yes. Yes, he did. This first came up in August when Musk interviewed Trump during a livestream conversation on X. Musk told Trump that he should create a, quote, "government efficiency commission." Shortly after that, Trump announced that he would create the commission and put Musk in charge, which is something that experts are saying could create a conflict of interest because Musk could have some sort of influence over the agencies that are tasked with policing his companies. And a lot of Musk's companies are under some of federal investigation. We're talking inquiries by the Justice Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency and so on. And with this, quote-unquote, "efficiency commission," both Musk and Trump have said they want to slash federal budgets. At rallies, Trump has hailed Musk as the, quote, "secretary of cost cutting," and Musk has said he wants to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget. That's nearly a third of the budget. SIMON: Something that has puzzled me, because of course, Elon Musk has a huge investment in electric vehicles... KERR: Right. SIMON: ...Donald Trump used to hate EVs, didn't he? KERR: Yes, yes. But now he really seems to be on board with them. And Trump has been giving Tesla real shoutouts in his rallies. In August, Trump said that he was all in for electric cars. And then he said, quote, "I have to be, you know, because Elon endorsed me very strongly." So, Scott, it's really hard to tell what's going to happen come January. But there's no doubt that we are going to keep hearing about this very public relationship between the president of the United States and the world's richest man. SIMON: NPR's Dara Kerr, thanks so much. KERR: Thank you. Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information. NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record. Facebook Flipboard Email Read & Listen Home News Culture Music Podcasts & Shows Connect Newsletters Facebook Instagram Press Public Editor Corrections Contact & Help About NPR Overview Diversity NPR Network Accessibility Ethics Finances Get Involved Support Public Radio Sponsor NPR NPR Careers NPR Shop NPR Events NPR Extra Terms of Use Privacy Your Privacy Choices Text Only Sponsor Message Become an NPR sponsor
sentences: With Twitter Deal Clock Ticking, Elon Musk's Outreach To Kanye West After Anti-Semitic Tweets Offers New Sign Of Social Media Climate Change Live × Close Player Skip to main content Open Mega Menu Got A Tip? deadline-logo-svg Deadline Follow Us: site categories TV Film Awards Awards Hub Digital Issues Box Office Biz International Politics Theater Reviews Obits Video Events Contenders Film: Nominees Film: Documentary Film: International Film: Los Angeles Film: London Television: The Nominees Television: Doc + Unscripted Television Sound & Screen Film Television Other For The Love Of Docs Visual Effects + Screen Festivals North America Sundance Toronto Telluride SXSW Tribeca Europe Cannes Zurich Venice Berlin/EFM Middle East Red Sea Asia Tokyo Insider News Alerts Menu deadline-logo-svg Deadline Read Next: Longtime Washington Post Columnist Ruth Marcus Resigns, Says CEO Killed Her Piece Critical Of Owner Jeff Bezos Got A Tip? Tip Us Home Business Acquisitions With Twitter Deal Clock Ticking, Elon Musk’s Outreach To Kanye West After Antisemitic Tweets Offers New Sign Of Social Media Climate Change By Dade Hayes , Jill Goldsmith October 11, 2022 10:08am 12 Comments Services to share this page. Share on Facebook Post Share to Flipboard Email Show more sharing options Share on LinkedIn Pin it Submit to Reddit Post to Tumblr Share on WhatsApp Print This Page Getty Elon Musk , who is poised to take control of Twitter , has raised a new round of questions about how the climate of social media could change with his revelation that he reached out to Kanye West after the rapper’s anti-Semitic tweets. “Talked to ye today & expressed my concerns about his recent tweet, which I think he took to heart,” Musk wrote in a tweet Monday night. The Tesla founder, who is negotiating final details of his $44 billion purchase of Twitter, has already sent loud signals about his concerns about how speech is controlled on the platform. It is widely expected that former President Donald Trump and others who have been banned by the social media platform will be welcomed back. The West affair takes Musk’s position to a different level, given the backlash against West in recent days. Related Stories News Elon Musk Says X Is Under "Massive" Cyberattack As Platform Suffers Multiple Outages News Korea's Barunson E&A Partners With Indonesia's Miles Films On 'What's With Love' Reboot 'Rangga & Cinta' Potential changes in Twitter’s moderation policies were front and center after Musk clinched a deal to buy the platform in April. But he walked away in July, Twitter sued and attention was then riveted by the legal drama, including a whistleblower, as the two sides sparred over texts, Slack messages and general discovery. Musk, who was staring down a deposition and possibly facing tough odds in a trial set for Oct. 17, renewed his $44 billion offer last week pending financing. A Delaware Chancery Court Judge stayed the trial and gave him until Oct. 28 to close the deal, refocusing attention on the real life impact of a Musk-owned Twitter just as the West controversy emerged. Twitter locked the rapper’s account for a violation of the social media platform’s policies after he tweeted Saturday that he was going “death con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE.” “I’m a bit sleepy tonight but when I wake up I’m going death con 3 On JEWISH PEOPLE,” said West, also known as Ye. “The funny thing is I actually can’t be Anti Semitic because black people are actually Jew also You guys have toyed with me and tried to black ball anyone whoever opposes your agenda.” The Twitter ban followed restrictions on West’s Instagram account by Mark Zuckerberg owned-Meta after West shared a screenshot of a text exchange with Sean “Diddy” Combs. He accused Combs of being controlled by Jewish people, saying he would use Combs as an “example to show the Jewish people that told you to call me that no one can threaten or influence me.” West, who hadn’t used Twitter for years, turned to the platform to complain. Musk responded, tweeting, “Welcome back to Twitter, my friend!” Yesterday, he followed up with the tweet saying that he’d expressed concerns to West. Talked to ye today & expressed my concerns about his recent tweet, which I think he took to heart — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 11, 2022 In a statement last week as the Musk-Twitter merger came back into focus, women’s group UltraViolet warned: “Get ready. Elon Musk is about to rip open Pandora’s box and flood the internet once again with hate, misogyny, racism and conspiracy theories.” “If this deal goes through, Twitter will become an even more dangerous place for women, threats of violence online against Black women and women of color will skyrocket, and anti-trans content will take hold of user feeds. Donald Trump will be replatformed and he will use his account to spread conspiracy theories and promote political violence,” it said. Nonprofit Media Matters called Twitter’s sale to Musk “the end of the company as we know it, and the beginning of a more toxic platform with incredible potential for real-world harm.” The debate over speech on social media has been raging for years with tech company heads called to Capitol Hill numerous times for a grilling. Federal law, specifically Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, protects platforms from legal liability for much of what appears on their sites, and gives them wide leeway in policing the content. Both sides of the aisle have called for reform of Section 230, often (but not always) for different reasons, with the right decrying censorship and the left looking for tighter controls on content. Must Read Stories Hide Articles Disney Wins ‘Moana’ Copyright Trial, But $10B Sequel Suit Still Alive Woody Harrelson & Kerry Condon Lead ‘Corazón de León’ Reimagining ‘Giant’ Margot Robbie & Colin Farrell’s ‘Big Bold Beautiful Journey’ Date Pushed Paul Feig; Michelle Obama Podcast; Photos, Reviews, News & Studio Read More About: Breaking News Controversial Digital Elon Musk Kanye West social media Twitter 12 Comments Subscribe to Deadline Get our Breaking News Alerts and Keep your inbox happy. Sign Up 12 Comments JavaScript is required to load the comments. Loading comments... Sidebar Trending on Deadline 1 Watch As Tornado Hits Florida TV Station & Meteorologist Covers It Live On Air 2 Skydance Cites "Overwhelming Evidence" Of Fraud By Late-Arriving Paramount Bidder, Accuses It Of "Hijacking" Merger Review Process 3 Disney Wins 'Moana' Copyright Trial, But $10B Sequel Suit Still Riding The Legal Waves, For Now 4 John Mulaney Reveals First Guests For Netflix’s ‘Everybody’s Live’ Talk Show 5 'The Righteous Gemstones': How Bradley Cooper Got To Star In Season 4 Premiere, Where Was The Cast & When Will They Return 6 Margot Robbie & Colin Farrell Romance Drama 'A Big Bold Beautiful Journey' Travels To Fall 7 Kennedy Center Confirms More Than 20 Show Cancellations Or Postponements Since Donald Trump's Takeover 8 Bill Maher Says 'Anora' Won Over 'Emilia Pérez' At The Oscars Because "Cancel Culture Is Still With Us" 9 'The Traitors' Winner Gabby Windey Signs With UTA 10 'Harry Potter': Janet McTeer In Negotiations To Play McGonagall; Paapa Essiedu Near Deal To Play Snape In HBO Series deadline-logo-svg Deadline Signup for Breaking News Alerts & Newsletters Your Email Sign Up By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Latest Business News Disney Wins 'Moana' Copyright Trial, But $10B Sequel Suit Still Riding The Legal Waves, For Now Bungled Attempt To Make Backyard S'mores Likely Caused Wildfires On Long Island, NY Officials Say; Blazes Near The Hamptons Fully Contained Skydance Cites "Overwhelming Evidence" Of Fraud By Late-Arriving Paramount Bidder, Accuses It Of "Hijacking" Merger Review Process Anne Rice Estate & Dinner Partners Sign With InkWell Management & Literate Marketplace Newswire Deadline About Us Advertise Legal Terms of Use Privacy Policy Accessibility AdChoices California Privacy Rights Your Privacy Choices EU Privacy Preferences Sitemap TV Film Awards Box Office Business International Connect with Us Get our latest storiesin the feed of your favorite networks Have a Tip? We want to hear from you! Send us a tip using our annonymous form. Send Us a Tip Stay in the Know Sign up for our breaking news alerts Your Email Sign Up By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. PMC Deadline is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2025 Deadline Hollywood, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Powered by WordPress.com VIP Our Sites Art in America Artforum Artnews ATX TV ATX TV Festival BGR Billboard BlogHer Deadline Flow Space Footwear News Gold Derby IndieWire LA3C Life is Beautiful Robb Report Rolling Stone SheKnows Soaps Sourcing Journal Sportico Spy StyleCaster The Hollywood Reporter TVLine Variety Vibe WWD Our Sites Art in America Artforum Artnews ATX TV ATX TV Festival BGR Billboard BlogHer Deadline Flow Space Footwear News Gold Derby IndieWire LA3C Life is Beautiful Robb Report Rolling Stone SheKnows Soaps Sourcing Journal Sportico Spy StyleCaster The Hollywood Reporter TVLine Variety Vibe WWD Site Close the menu deadline-logo-svg TV Expand the sub-menu Castings Ratings Primetime Pilot Panic Late-Night Film Expand the sub-menu Festivals Reviews Castings Acquisitions Documentary Executives Awards Expand the sub-menu Emmys Oscars Tonys Box Office Expand the sub-menu International B.O. Specialty B.O. Broadway B.O. Business Expand the sub-menu ElectionLine Legal Agencies Executives International Expand the sub-menu Festivals Film TV International Insider Video Expand the sub-menu The Film That Lit My Fuse Trailers The Actor's Side Behind The Lens Production Value More Expand the sub-menu Obituaries Podcasts Insider Books Sports Commentary Follow Us Alerts & Newsletters Sign Up By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Advertise About Us Give us feedback Leave us a tip Deadline is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2025 Deadline Hollywood, LLC. All Rights Reserved. ad, The Government Wants To Play God. What Does That Mean For Our Freedoms? | ZeroHedge Home Join Premium Contributors Channels All Partners The Market Ear SpotGamma Store Donate More RSS About Advertise Debates Zerohedge Debates ZeroHedge Reads Alt-Market AntiWar.com Bitcoin Magazine Bombthrower BULLIONSTAR Capitalist Exploits Christophe Barraud Dollar Collapse Dr. Housing Bubble Financial Revolutionist ForexLive Gains Pains & Capital Gefira GMG Research Gold Core Implode-Explode Insider Paper Liberty Blitzkrieg Max Keiser Mises Institute Mish Talk Newsquawk Of Two Minds Oil Price Open The Books Peter Schiff Portfolio Armor QTR’s Fringe Finance Safehaven Slope of Hope SpotGamma TF Metals Report The Automatic Earth The Burning Platform The Economic Populist The Libertarian Institute Themis Trading Thoughtful Money Value Walk Visual Combat Banzai7 Wolf Street Expand The Government Wants To Play God. What Does That Mean For Our Freedoms? by Tyler Durden Authored... Authored by John & Nisha Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute , The government wants to play god. It wants the power to decide who lives or dies and whose rights are worthy of protection. Abortion may still be front and center in the power struggle between the Left and the Right over who has the right to decide—the government or the individual—when it comes to bodily autonomy, the right to privacy, sexual freedom, the rights of the unborn, and property interests in one’s body, but there’s so much more at play. In the 50-plus years since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Roe v. Wade , the government has come to believe that it not only has the power to determine who is deserving of constitutional rights in the eyes of the law but it also has the authority to deny those rights to an American citizen. This is how the abortion debate has played into the police state’s hands: by laying the groundwork for discussions about who else may or may not be deserving of rights. Despite the Supreme Court having overturned its earlier rulings recognizing abortion as a constitutional right under the Fourteenth Amendment, the government continues to play fast and loose with the lives of the citizenry all along the spectrum of life. Take a good, hard look at the many ways in which Americans are being denied their rights under the Constitution. American families who have their dogs shot, their homes trashed and their children terrorized or, worse, killed by errant SWAT team raids in the middle of the night are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Disabled individuals who are being strip searched, handcuffed, arrested and “diagnosed” by police as dangerous or mentally unstable merely because they stutter and walk unevenly are being denied their rights under the Constitution. School-aged children as young as 4-years-old who are leg shackled, handcuffed and strip searched for violating school zero tolerance policies by chewing a Pop Tart into the shape of a gun and playing an imaginary game of cops and robbers, or engaging in childish behavior such as crying or jumping are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Unarmed citizens who are tasered or shot by police for daring to hesitate, stutter, move a muscle, flee or disagree in any way with a police order are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Likewise, Americans—young and old alike—who are shot by police because they pointed a garden hose at a police officer, reached for their registration in their glove box, relied upon a cane to steady themselves, or were seen playing with air rifles or BB guns are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Female motorists who are unlucky enough to be pulled over for a questionable traffic infraction only to be subjected by police to cavity searches by the side of the road are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Male pedestrians and motorists alike who are being subjected to roadside strip searches and rectal probes by police based largely on the color of their skin are being denied their rights under the Constitution. American citizens subjected to government surveillance whereby their phone calls are being listened in on , their mail and text messages read, their movements tracked and their transactions monitored are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Homeowners who are being fined and arrested for raising chickens in their backyard, allowing the grass in their front yards to grow too long , and holding Bible studies in their homes are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Decorated military veterans who are being arrested for criticizing the government on social media such as Facebook are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Homeless individuals who are being harassed, arrested and run out of towns by laws that criminalize homelessness are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Individuals whose DNA has been forcibly collected and entered into federal and state law enforcement databases whether or not they have been convicted of any crime are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Drivers whose license plates are being scanned, uploaded to a police database and used to map their movements , whether or not they are suspected of any crime, are being denied their rights under the Constitution. The same goes for drivers who are being ticketed for running afoul of red light cameras without any real opportunity to defend themselves against such a charge are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Protesters and activists who are being labeled domestic terrorists and extremists and accused of hate crimes for speaking freely are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Likewise, American citizens who being targeted for assassination by drone strikes abroad without having been charged, tried and convicted of treason are being denied their rights under the Constitution. Hard-working Americans whose bank accounts, homes, cars electronics and cash are seized by police (operating according to asset forfeiture schemes that provide profit incentives for highway robbery) are being denied their rights under the Constitution. So, what is the common denominator here? These are all American citizens — endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights , rights that no person or government can take away from them, among these the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness—and they are all being oppressed in one way or another by a government that has grown drunk on power, money and its own authority. If the government—be it the President, Congress, the courts or any federal, state or local agent or agency—can decide that any person has no rights, then that person becomes less than a citizen, less than human, less than deserving of respect, dignity, civility and bodily integrity. He or she becomes an “it,” a faceless number that can be tallied and tracked, a quantifiable mass of cells that can be discarded without conscience, an expendable cost that can be written off without a second thought, or an animal that can be bought, sold, branded, chained, caged, bred, neutered and euthanized at will. It’s a slippery slope that justifies all manner of violations in the name of national security, the interest of the state and the so-called greater good. Yet those who founded this country believed that what we conceive of as our rights were given to us by God—we are created equal, according to the nation’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence—and that government cannot create, nor can it extinguish our God-given rights. To do so would be to anoint the government with god-like powers and elevate it above the citizenry. Unfortunately, we have been dancing with this particular devil for quite some time now. If we continue to wait for the government to restore our freedoms, respect our rights, rein in its abuses and restrain its agents from riding roughshod over our lives, our liberty and our happiness, then we will be waiting forever. The highly politicized tug-of-war over abortion will not resolve the problem of a culture that values life based on a sliding scale. Nor will it help us navigate the moral, ethical and scientific minefields that await us as technology and humanity move ever closer to a point of singularity. Humanity is being propelled at warp speed into a whole new frontier when it comes to privacy, bodily autonomy, and what it means to be a human being. As such, we haven’t even begun to wrap our heads around how present-day legal debates over bodily autonomy, privacy, vaccine mandates, the death penalty, and abortion play into future discussions about singularity, artificial intelligence, cloning, and the privacy rights of the individual in the face of increasingly invasive, intrusive and unavoidable government technologies. Yet here is what I know. Life is an inalienable right. By allowing the government to decide who or what is deserving of rights, it shifts the entire discussion from one in which we are “endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights” (that of life, liberty property and the pursuit of happiness) to one in which only those favored by the government get to enjoy such rights. If all people are created equal, then all lives should be equally worthy of protection. 0 Loading... Sign Up For ZH Premium Today's Top Stories Contact Information + Assistance and Requests: Contact Us Tips: tips@zerohedge.com General: info@zerohedge.com Legal: legal@zerohedge.com Advertising: Contact Us Abuse/Complaints: abuse@zerohedge.com Suggested Reading + Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide It would be very wise of you to study our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure . Here's our Cookie Policy . How to report offensive comments Notice on Racial Discrimination . Discrimination Notice Privacy Policy Disclosure Disclaimer Privacy and cookie settings Advertise with ZeroHedge Copyright ©2009- 2025 ZeroHedge.com/ABC Media, LTD, Musk, Ramaswamy’s Plans for DOGE | The Epoch Times Open sidebar AD Support Us SHARE Newsletter Constitution Ave Musk, Ramaswamy’s Plans for DOGE Copy Facebook X Truth Gettr LinkedIn Telegram Email Save (Left) Entrepreneur and author Vivek Ramaswamy arrives on stage for the first Republican Presidential primary debate at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wis., on Aug. 23, 2023. (Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images) (Right) Elon Musk attends the 2022 Met Gala celebrating "In America: An Anthology of Fashion" at The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City on May 2, 2022. Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue By Epoch Times Staff 11/20/2024 Updated: 11/20/2024 Print X 1 0:00 Named after a meme-inspired cryptocurrency coin and theorized during a pre-election interview on billionaire Elon Musk’s social platform X, President-elect Donald Trump is launching the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in his second administration. Musk and former Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy will co-chair the effort, which aims to reduce government spending and reform, or remove, entire federal agencies. The pair is tasked with cutting the federal government’s roughly $6.75 trillion spending in 2024 and hacking through a labyrinth of executive branch regulations. “Together, these two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my administration to dismantle government bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure federal agencies,” Trump wrote in a statement . “It will become, potentially, ‘The Manhattan Project’ of our time. Republican politicians have dreamed about the objectives of ‘DOGE’ for a very long time.” But accomplishing that effort is not only difficult , but the exact path forward remains unclear, experts told The Epoch Times. Related Story Ramaswamy Pledges ‘Massive’ Federal Downsizing in DOGE Role 11/13/2024 Trump said DOGE would serve in an advisory capacity to the White House and the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), may encounter roadblocks in its efforts to “drive large-scale structural reform.” Despite it carrying the “department” title in its name, DOGE is not a federal agency like the Department of Education, or the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which audits the federal government for Congress. “Trump has made clear that DOGE is an advisory board operating outside the federal government. Thus, unlike federal agencies, it does not need to be formally enacted through an act of Congress,” Jordan Haring , the director of fiscal policy at the American Action Forum, told The Epoch Times. With DOGE, Musk and Ramaswamy want to cut roughly $2 trillion from the federal budget, amounting to 30 percent of annual government spending. Musk plans to use artificial intelligence and crowd-sourcing to find waste , abuse, and fraud in the federal government’s expenditures. That could include “deleting outright” certain federal agencies, as Ramaswamy said in a recent interview. In 2023, federal agencies self-reported roughly $236 billion in improper payments that either shouldn’t have been issued, were made in the incorrect amount, or did not have proper supporting documentation, according to the GAO. RealClear Investigations found that the federal government had mistakenly paid $1.3 billion to dead people in fiscal year 2023 alone, citing data from the OMB. But DOGE may face headwinds with some of its more ambitious spending-cut plans, as reducing key portions of the federal budget could draw ire from both sides of the political aisle. Social Security was a significant chunk—21 percent, or $1.4 trillion —of the annual federal budget in 2023, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Trump promised this year that he would not consider any changes or reforms to entitlement programs and even suggested no more taxes on benefits, which could cost the government even more. Spending on health insurance programs like Medicare and the Affordable Care Act accounted for 24 percent of the federal budget in 2023. DOGE can also target federal regulations , as both Trump and Musk indicated on the campaign trail. “By all measures, the government regulatory apparatus has been growing for decades, regardless of the party in office, and the last four years have been especially active,” wrote Susan E. Dudley, the founder and senior scholar of the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center. President Joe Biden alone has presided over a vast regulatory agenda that has cost roughly $1.8 trillion in the past four years, according to the center-right advocacy group, American Action Forum. Other economic experts are less enthusiastic about Musk’s role at the forefront of the project, which would give the tech CEO and billionaire considerable influence on the same federal government that issues critical contracts and subsidies to his companies, SpaceX and Tesla. “Handing the keys of government to those looking to profit from our government is extremely dangerous and a massive conflict of interest,” Zach Moller, the economic program director at Third Way, a center-left think tank, wrote in a statement . Moller fears that DOGE would lead to “more waste … and rampant abuse of political power.” Fraud in federal spending is an important issue , and much can be accomplished by going after those who bilk federal agencies, Moller said. “But let’s put someone in charge who is qualified and doesn’t have a personal financial stake in the outcome. We wouldn’t put a director of a government agency at the head of Tesla. Let’s not make a similar mistake here,” he added. — Jacob Burg BOOKMARKS Russian President Vladimir Putin has altered that country’s nuclear response doctrine, saying that an attack on Russia (by Ukraine) using weapons supplied by a country with nuclear capabilities (the U.S.) constitutes a joint attack. The statement comes after anonymous sources say that President Joe Biden has authorized Ukraine to perform long-range missile strikes into Russian territory. FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell says an internal investigation shows no evidence that its senior leadership told relief workers to ignore homes with Trump signs. Criswell’s statement follows revelations that a supervisor, Marn’i Washington , instructed those under her leadership to do just that, resulting in her termination. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has asked election officials to comply with a ruling by that state’s Supreme Court to cease counting ballots with missing or incorrect dates. “I expect all county election officials to adhere to this ruling and all the applicable laws governing our elections,” Shapiro said after officials in Bucks, Montgomery, and Philadelphia counties announced that they intended to count those ballots anyway. Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs said she is open to working with President-elect Donald Trump on securing the border, but expressed reservations about some aspects of his plan such as mass deportation of illegals. ”We don’t know what a mass deportation plan will look like, what resources it will involve,” Hobbs said, but vowed to protect Arizonans from “harm from the federal government.” The government of Alberta, Canada, is taking a second look at its medical assistance in dying (MAID) laws, which provide government-assisted suicide. The government is floating a survey to gauge residents’ stances on the practice, which may soon be expanded to include those whose only ailment is mental illness. — Stacy Robinson Share this article Share this article Leave a comment Epoch Times Staff Author Author’s Selected Articles Are States Scamming Medicaid? Mar 10, 2025 Day in Photos: Ship Collision, Strike at German Airports, and Holi Festival Mar 10, 2025 Johnson’s 6-Month Funding Patch Mar 10, 2025 Day in Photos: Flooding in Australia, Confrontation Outside White House, Rally in Syria Mar 09, 2025 Comment Save Share Copyright © 2000 - 2025 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved., source_sentence: Alabama governor signs into law two bills limiting transgender youth protections | CNN CNN values your feedback 1. How relevant is this ad to you? 2. Did you encounter any technical issues? Video player was slow to load content Video content never loaded Ad froze or did not finish loading Video content did not start after ad Audio on ad was too loud Other issues Ad never loaded Ad prevented/slowed the page from loading Content moved around while ad loaded Ad was repetitive to ads I've seen previously Other issues Cancel Submit Thank You! Your effort and contribution in providing this feedback is much appreciated. Close Ad Feedback Close icon US Crime + Justice More Crime + Justice Watch Listen Live TV Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Live TV Listen Watch Edition US International Arabic Espa√±ol Edition US International Arabic Espa√±ol Crime + Justice Follow CNN US Crime + Justice World Africa Americas Asia Australia China Europe India Middle East United Kingdom Politics SCOTUS Congress Facts First 2024 Elections Business Tech Media Calculators Videos Markets Pre-markets After-Hours Fear & Greed Investing Markets Now Nightcap Health Life, But Better Fitness Food Sleep Mindfulness Relationships Entertainment Movies Television Celebrity Tech Innovate Foreseeable Future Mission: Ahead Work Transformed Innovative Cities Style Arts Design Fashion Architecture Luxury Beauty Video Travel Destinations Food & Drink Stay Videos Sports Pro Football College Football Basketball Baseball Soccer Olympics Hockey Science Space Life Unearthed Climate Solutions Weather Weather Video Climate Ukraine-Russia War Israel-Hamas War Watch Live TV CNN Headlines CNN Shorts Shows A-Z CNN10 CNN Max CNN TV Schedules FlashDocs Listen CNN 5 Things Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta The Assignment with Audie Cornish One Thing Tug of War CNN Political Briefing The Axe Files All There Is with Anderson Cooper All CNN Audio podcasts CNN Underscored Electronics Fashion Beauty Health & Fitness Home Reviews Deals Gifts Travel Outdoors Pets Games CNN Crossword Jumble Crossword Photo Shuffle Sudoblock Sudoku 5 Things Quiz About CNN Subscribe Photos Investigations CNN Profiles CNN Leadership CNN Newsletters Work for CNN Ad Feedback Alabama governor signs into law two bills limiting transgender youth protections By Steve Almasy and Amanda Musa , CNN 5 minute read Updated 4:50 PM EDT, Fri April 8, 2022 Link Copied! Sen. Shay Shelnutt, seated at center, listening to debate on transgender bills in the senate chamber at the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama, on Thursday April 7, 2022. Mickey Welsh/USA TODAY NETWORK/Reuters CNN — Alabama‚Äôs Republican-controlled legislature passed two bills on the last day of the session targeting transgender children, including one which makes it a felony for a doctor to administer gender-affirming health care to minors. Another bill, which requires K-12 students to use bathrooms designated for their biological sex, included a last-hour amendment Thursday critics have compared to similar legislation in Florida dubbed the ‚ÄúDon‚Äôt Say Gay‚Äù law. It would ban classroom discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity in elementary schools. The state‚Äôs House of Representatives also approved SB 184, which would make it a class C felony for medical professionals to provide gender-affirming care ‚Äì such as hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender-reassignment surgery ‚Äì to people 18 and younger. Republican Gov. Kay Ivey signed the bills into law Friday. ‚ÄúThere are very real challenges facing our young people, especially with today‚Äôs societal pressures and modern culture. I believe very strongly that if the Good Lord made you a boy, you are a boy, and if he made you a girl, you are a girl. We should especially protect our children from these radical, life-altering drugs and surgeries when they are at such a vulnerable stage in life. Instead, let us all focus on helping them to properly develop into the adults God intended them to be,‚Äù she said, according to a statement from her press office. Senate Bill 184 states medical professionals who provide gender-affirming care could face up to 10 years in prison. ‚ÄúThe decision to pursue a course of hormonal and surgical interventions to address a discordance between the individual‚Äôs sex and sense of identity should not be presented to or determined for minors who are incapable of comprehending the negative implications and life-course difficulties attending to these interventions,‚Äù the bill reads. from Gov. Ron DeSantis/Twitter Related article Book bans move to center stage in the red-state education wars The legislation would also make it a violation for public or private school officials, such as teachers, principals, nurses and counselors to encourage a minor to withhold from their parent or guardian ‚Äúthe fact that the minor‚Äôs perception of his or her gender or sex is inconsistent with the minor‚Äôs sex.‚Äù The bill, dubbed the Alabama Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act, passed the Republican-controlled House following a 66-28 vote, according to the state legislature‚Äôs website. The GOP-led Senate passed the bill 24-6 in February, and it will become law 30 days after the governor‚Äôs signature. Alabama would be the latest state to enact such a measure. Last year, Republican lawmakers in Arkansas overrode a veto from their governor to put their own health care ban on the books, and Tennessee and Arizona have passed similar bans . The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued Arkansas over its ban last year, and in July, a federal judge temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the law. The ACLU, the ACLU of Alabama and other legal advocacy groups announced plans to file a legal challenge to the bill. ‚ÄúOur representatives have been hearing from medical experts, parents, transgender youth, and other advocates for the past three years in an attempt to stop this harmful bill from passing. But despite this strong opposition, the Legislature seems determined to move ahead with this shameful effort to prevent parents and kids from deciding the best course of treatment for themselves,‚Äù said Kaitlin Welborn, staff attorney for the ACLU of Alabama. ‚ÄúIf the state moves forward in passing this unconstitutional bill, we‚Äôll see them in court.‚Äù Transgender students bathroom bill passed Later, the legislature passed a bill requiring K-12 students to use bathrooms designated for their biological sex. House Bill 322 also includes a late amendment banning classroom discussions or instruction about sexual orientation and gender identity in elementary schools. LOUISVILLE, KY - APRIL 09: Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear speaks at the Center for African American Heritage during a bill signing event on April 9, 2021 in Louisville, Kentucky. One of the bills signed into effect was SB4, which places more restrictions on no-knock raids and limits police departments power to use them. This bill comes as a response to the killing of Breonna Taylor during the execution of a no-knock warrant on March 13, 2020. (Photo by Jon Cherry/Getty Images) Jon Cherry/Getty Images Related article Kentucky's Democratic governor vetoes anti-trans sports ban An original version of the bill sought ‚Äúto require public K-12 schools to designate the use of rooms where students may be in various stages of undress upon the basis of biological sex.‚Äù Just before the final vote Thursday afternoon, Republican state Sen. Shay Shelnutt introduced an amendment to ‚Äúprohibit classroom instruction or discussion on sexual orientation or gender identity for students in kindergarten through the fifth grade.‚Äù Shelnutt‚Äôs amendment also declares schools should not ‚Äúengage in classroom discussion or provide classroom instruction regarding sexual orientation or gender identity in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.‚Äù The bill, including Shelnutt‚Äôs amendment, passed the state Senate in a 26-5 vote. After the bill was sent back to the House for a concurrence vote, the amendment was adopted Thursday night following a 70-26 vote. The bill now heads to Ivey for final approval, according to Julie Saint, supervisor for enrolling and engrossing for the Alabama House of Representatives. Opponents of the measure condemned its passage, with the ACLU of Alabama saying, ‚ÄúIt also invokes legislation similar to Florida‚Äôs controversial ‚ÄòDon‚Äôt Say Gay‚Äô bill by banning classroom instruction or discussion of gender identity in public elementary schools.‚Äù The legislation violates the US Constitution and Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, the ACLU said. The Human Rights Campaign issued a statement Thursday night, ‚Äútransgender students will bear the cost of the discrimination ‚Äì discrimination which already causes transgender youth to feel unsafe in school, suffer academically, and have a higher likelihood of dropping out of school.‚Äù The governor said signing the bill was a ‚Äúno-brainer.‚Äù ‚ÄúLet me be clear to the media and opponents who like to incorrectly dub this the ‚ÄúDon‚Äôt Say Gay‚Äù amendment: That is misleading, false and just plain wrong,‚Äù Ivery said. ‚ÄúWe don‚Äôt need to be teaching young children about sex. We are talking about five-year-olds for crying out loud. We need to focus on what matters: core instruction like reading and math.‚Äù Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Ad Feedback Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Live TV Listen Watch US Crime + Justice World Africa Americas Asia Australia China Europe India Middle East United Kingdom Politics SCOTUS Congress Facts First 2024 Elections Business Tech Media Calculators Videos Markets Pre-markets After-Hours Fear & Greed Investing Markets Now Nightcap Health Life, But Better Fitness Food Sleep Mindfulness Relationships Entertainment Movies Television Celebrity Tech Innovate Foreseeable Future Mission: Ahead Work Transformed Innovative Cities Style Arts Design Fashion Architecture Luxury Beauty Video Travel Destinations Food & Drink Stay News Videos Sports Pro Football College Football Basketball Baseball Soccer Olympics Hockey Science Space Life Unearthed Climate Solutions Weather Weather Video Climate Ukraine-Russia War Israel-Hamas War Watch Live TV CNN Headlines CNN Shorts Shows A-Z CNN10 CNN Max CNN TV Schedules FlashDocs Listen CNN 5 Things Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta The Assignment with Audie Cornish One Thing Tug of War CNN Political Briefing The Axe Files All There Is with Anderson Cooper All CNN Audio podcasts CNN Underscored Electronics Fashion Beauty Health & Fitness Home Reviews Deals Gifts Travel Outdoors Pets Games CNN Crossword Jumble Crossword Photo Shuffle Sudoblock Sudoku 5 Things Quiz About CNN Subscribe Photos Investigations CNN Profiles CNN Leadership CNN Newsletters Work for CNN US Watch Listen Live TV Follow CNN Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics You Follow Sign Out Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account Terms of Use Privacy Policy Ad Choices Accessibility & CC About Subscribe Newsletters Transcripts Help Center © 2025 Cable News Network. A Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All Rights Reserved. CNN Sans ‚Ñ¢ & ¬© 2016 Cable News Network.
sentences: Student Tries, Fails to Get Michigan Professor’s Pro-Life Posters Removed – America First Report SUBSCRIBE Home Type Original Curated Aggregated Style News Opinions Videos Podcasts About Us Contact America First Newsletter No Result View All Result Home Type Original Curated Aggregated Style News Opinions Videos Podcasts About Us Contact America First Newsletter No Result View All Result No Result View All Result Home Type Aggregated Student Tries, Fails to Get Michigan Professor’s Pro-Life Posters Removed by The College Fix March 7, 2025 in Aggregated , Opinions The Grid Doctor 300 Is an Affordable and Portable Solar Power Generator Worth Getting An Eastern Michigan University student diligently tried to force a professor to remove pro-life posters from her office window this winter. However, free speech at the public institution prevailed. Alice Rainville, a health sciences professor, is still displaying the posters in her office. One reads, “Face It … Abortion Kills A Person!!” alongside the photo of a baby, and the other says, “Stand Up for Religious Freedom,” The Eastern Echo reports . “That’s my faculty office, meaning I can put up what I want…” Rainville said. “No one can take away your right to express your viewpoint. In fact, a college campus is a great place to explore viewpoints and find your beliefs.” But graduate student Ben Kelly disagrees. He described the posters as “violent” and “upsetting on a human level” in an interview with the student newspaper. […] — Read More: www.thecollegefix.com The JD Rucker Show — Rumble — X (Twitter) — YouTube Don’t need the grid… BE THE GRID. Grab a personal solar generator for bugging in or bugging out. Next Post Trump’s Office of Civil Rights Targets Maine for Defying Trump’s Order on Women’s Sports Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ America First Newsletter About Us America First Newsletter Contact Home Newsletter Privacy Policy Site Operated By JD Rucker . © 2023 America First Report . No Result View All Result Home Original Curated Aggregated News Opinions Videos Podcasts About Us Contact Privacy Policy © 2023 America First Report . Are you sure want to unlock this post? Unlock left : 0 Yes No Are you sure want to cancel subscription? Yes No, Major Mainstream Outlet Abruptly Quits 'Toxic' X/Twitter Home Politics Entertainment Download Our News App Shop Here Connect with us Trending Politics Conservative Breaking News and Commentary Major Mainstream Outlet Abruptly Quits ‘Toxic’ X/Twitter Home Politics Entertainment Download Our News App Shop Here Politics Major Mainstream Outlet Abruptly Quits 'Toxic' X/Twitter Politics Royal Prince Passes Away At Just 22 Politics NEW: Pope Francis Gets Encouraging Medical Update Politics LeBron James Gets In Reporter's Face In Heated Blow-Up Politics JUST IN: Zelenskyy Folds, Apologizes To Trump For Oval Office Incident Politics Former Iraqi Refugee Pleads Guilty To Providing Material Support For ISIS Politics JUST IN: JFK's Chilling Memo To CIA Days Before His Death Is Revealed, Raises Questions Politics NEW: DOGE Announces Its Next Target Politics WATCH: DC's 'Black Lives Matter Plaza' Is Dismantled Politics JUST IN: Watchdog Claims Biden Team Used 'Autopen' To Sign Executive Orders Politics Major Mainstream Outlet Abruptly Quits ‘Toxic’ X/Twitter Published 4 months ago on November 13, 2024 By Mark Steffen It’s not only angry liberals who are rage-quitting X following President-elect Donald Trump’s dominant victory. On Wednesday one of the largest outlets in the world abruptly stopped posting, writing that the “toxic” platform necessitated its exit. The BBC reported that the Guardian, the U.K. paper of record, announced it would no longer participate in a “toxic media platform” owned by Elon Musk, a Trump supporter who on Tuesday was tapped to co-lead a new U.S. Department of Government Efficiency. In a statement, the mainstream news outlet said Trump’s win “underlined” its concern that Musk unfairly used X to “shape political discourse.” (VOTE: Should ’60 Minutes’ Be Investigated For Deceptively Editing Kamala Interview?) “We think that the benefits of being on X are now outweighed by the negatives and that resources could be better used promoting our journalism elsewhere,” the paper wrote in a message to readers on Wednesday. “This is something we have been considering for a while given the often disturbing content promoted or found on the platform, including far-right conspiracy theories and racism. The US presidential election campaign served only to underline what we have considered for a long time: that X is a toxic media platform and that its owner, Elon Musk, has been able to use its influence to shape political discourse.” The navel-gazing editorial team took a final shot at Musk and the prominent social media platform before making a plea for donations. “Social media can be an important tool for news organisations and help us to reach new audiences but, at this point, X now plays a diminished role in promoting our work. Our journalism is available and open to all on our website and we would prefer people to come to theguardian.com and support our work there.” “Thankfully, we can do this because our business model does not rely on viral content tailored to the whims of the social media giants’ algorithms – instead we’re funded directly by our readers. You can support the Guardian today from just £1/$1.” News of the Guardian’s exit should come as no surprise given the animosity between Musk and mainstream media outlets in recent years. In 2023 he slapped NPR and the BBC with “state-sponsored media” disclaimers typically reserved for outlets controlled by authoritarian regimes in places like Russia or North Korea. In response, NPR rage-quit X. Allegations of conservative biases on X come after conservatives have long complained of liberal coverage by outlets like NPR. During the onset of Covid-19 in April 2020, NPR ran back-to-back pieces dismissing the theory that the virus escaped a Wuhan epidemiology lab as being on “thin ice” with “virtually no chance” such a scenario could occur. No correction was attached to either story since earlier this year when U.S. officials designated a lab leak as the most likely culprit. “Seems accurate,” Musk wrote at the time and included a definition of state-sponsored media which he said applies to NPR. This time around, he may be too busy to clap back at the Guardian; his heavy investment in President-elect Trump paid off, and Musk will be at the forefront of the administration’s effort to fundamentally scale back the size of the federal government. (FREE REPORT: Take Advantage Of Trump’s New “IRS Loophole” ASAP) Related Topics: Elon Musk featured the guardian Twitter X "Download our shopping app and use promo code ILMF for 40% off your first purchase" (mobile users only) About Advertise Sitemap Affiliate Disclosure Partners Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 Trending Politics, With Twitter Deal Clock Ticking, Elon Musk's Outreach To Kanye West After Anti-Semitic Tweets Offers New Sign Of Social Media Climate Change Live × Close Player Skip to main content Open Mega Menu Got A Tip? deadline-logo-svg Deadline Follow Us: site categories TV Film Awards Awards Hub Digital Issues Box Office Biz International Politics Theater Reviews Obits Video Events Contenders Film: Nominees Film: Documentary Film: International Film: Los Angeles Film: London Television: The Nominees Television: Doc + Unscripted Television Sound & Screen Film Television Other For The Love Of Docs Visual Effects + Screen Festivals North America Sundance Toronto Telluride SXSW Tribeca Europe Cannes Zurich Venice Berlin/EFM Middle East Red Sea Asia Tokyo Insider News Alerts Menu deadline-logo-svg Deadline Read Next: Longtime Washington Post Columnist Ruth Marcus Resigns, Says CEO Killed Her Piece Critical Of Owner Jeff Bezos Got A Tip? Tip Us Home Business Acquisitions With Twitter Deal Clock Ticking, Elon Musk’s Outreach To Kanye West After Antisemitic Tweets Offers New Sign Of Social Media Climate Change By Dade Hayes , Jill Goldsmith October 11, 2022 10:08am 12 Comments Services to share this page. Share on Facebook Post Share to Flipboard Email Show more sharing options Share on LinkedIn Pin it Submit to Reddit Post to Tumblr Share on WhatsApp Print This Page Getty Elon Musk , who is poised to take control of Twitter , has raised a new round of questions about how the climate of social media could change with his revelation that he reached out to Kanye West after the rapper’s anti-Semitic tweets. “Talked to ye today & expressed my concerns about his recent tweet, which I think he took to heart,” Musk wrote in a tweet Monday night. The Tesla founder, who is negotiating final details of his $44 billion purchase of Twitter, has already sent loud signals about his concerns about how speech is controlled on the platform. It is widely expected that former President Donald Trump and others who have been banned by the social media platform will be welcomed back. The West affair takes Musk’s position to a different level, given the backlash against West in recent days. Related Stories News Elon Musk Says X Is Under "Massive" Cyberattack As Platform Suffers Multiple Outages News Korea's Barunson E&A Partners With Indonesia's Miles Films On 'What's With Love' Reboot 'Rangga & Cinta' Potential changes in Twitter’s moderation policies were front and center after Musk clinched a deal to buy the platform in April. But he walked away in July, Twitter sued and attention was then riveted by the legal drama, including a whistleblower, as the two sides sparred over texts, Slack messages and general discovery. Musk, who was staring down a deposition and possibly facing tough odds in a trial set for Oct. 17, renewed his $44 billion offer last week pending financing. A Delaware Chancery Court Judge stayed the trial and gave him until Oct. 28 to close the deal, refocusing attention on the real life impact of a Musk-owned Twitter just as the West controversy emerged. Twitter locked the rapper’s account for a violation of the social media platform’s policies after he tweeted Saturday that he was going “death con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE.” “I’m a bit sleepy tonight but when I wake up I’m going death con 3 On JEWISH PEOPLE,” said West, also known as Ye. “The funny thing is I actually can’t be Anti Semitic because black people are actually Jew also You guys have toyed with me and tried to black ball anyone whoever opposes your agenda.” The Twitter ban followed restrictions on West’s Instagram account by Mark Zuckerberg owned-Meta after West shared a screenshot of a text exchange with Sean “Diddy” Combs. He accused Combs of being controlled by Jewish people, saying he would use Combs as an “example to show the Jewish people that told you to call me that no one can threaten or influence me.” West, who hadn’t used Twitter for years, turned to the platform to complain. Musk responded, tweeting, “Welcome back to Twitter, my friend!” Yesterday, he followed up with the tweet saying that he’d expressed concerns to West. Talked to ye today & expressed my concerns about his recent tweet, which I think he took to heart — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 11, 2022 In a statement last week as the Musk-Twitter merger came back into focus, women’s group UltraViolet warned: “Get ready. Elon Musk is about to rip open Pandora’s box and flood the internet once again with hate, misogyny, racism and conspiracy theories.” “If this deal goes through, Twitter will become an even more dangerous place for women, threats of violence online against Black women and women of color will skyrocket, and anti-trans content will take hold of user feeds. Donald Trump will be replatformed and he will use his account to spread conspiracy theories and promote political violence,” it said. Nonprofit Media Matters called Twitter’s sale to Musk “the end of the company as we know it, and the beginning of a more toxic platform with incredible potential for real-world harm.” The debate over speech on social media has been raging for years with tech company heads called to Capitol Hill numerous times for a grilling. Federal law, specifically Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, protects platforms from legal liability for much of what appears on their sites, and gives them wide leeway in policing the content. Both sides of the aisle have called for reform of Section 230, often (but not always) for different reasons, with the right decrying censorship and the left looking for tighter controls on content. Must Read Stories Hide Articles Disney Wins ‘Moana’ Copyright Trial, But $10B Sequel Suit Still Alive Woody Harrelson & Kerry Condon Lead ‘Corazón de León’ Reimagining ‘Giant’ Margot Robbie & Colin Farrell’s ‘Big Bold Beautiful Journey’ Date Pushed Paul Feig; Michelle Obama Podcast; Photos, Reviews, News & Studio Read More About: Breaking News Controversial Digital Elon Musk Kanye West social media Twitter 12 Comments Subscribe to Deadline Get our Breaking News Alerts and Keep your inbox happy. Sign Up 12 Comments JavaScript is required to load the comments. Loading comments... Sidebar Trending on Deadline 1 Watch As Tornado Hits Florida TV Station & Meteorologist Covers It Live On Air 2 Skydance Cites "Overwhelming Evidence" Of Fraud By Late-Arriving Paramount Bidder, Accuses It Of "Hijacking" Merger Review Process 3 Disney Wins 'Moana' Copyright Trial, But $10B Sequel Suit Still Riding The Legal Waves, For Now 4 John Mulaney Reveals First Guests For Netflix’s ‘Everybody’s Live’ Talk Show 5 'The Righteous Gemstones': How Bradley Cooper Got To Star In Season 4 Premiere, Where Was The Cast & When Will They Return 6 Margot Robbie & Colin Farrell Romance Drama 'A Big Bold Beautiful Journey' Travels To Fall 7 Kennedy Center Confirms More Than 20 Show Cancellations Or Postponements Since Donald Trump's Takeover 8 Bill Maher Says 'Anora' Won Over 'Emilia Pérez' At The Oscars Because "Cancel Culture Is Still With Us" 9 'The Traitors' Winner Gabby Windey Signs With UTA 10 'Harry Potter': Janet McTeer In Negotiations To Play McGonagall; Paapa Essiedu Near Deal To Play Snape In HBO Series deadline-logo-svg Deadline Signup for Breaking News Alerts & Newsletters Your Email Sign Up By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Latest Business News Disney Wins 'Moana' Copyright Trial, But $10B Sequel Suit Still Riding The Legal Waves, For Now Bungled Attempt To Make Backyard S'mores Likely Caused Wildfires On Long Island, NY Officials Say; Blazes Near The Hamptons Fully Contained Skydance Cites "Overwhelming Evidence" Of Fraud By Late-Arriving Paramount Bidder, Accuses It Of "Hijacking" Merger Review Process Anne Rice Estate & Dinner Partners Sign With InkWell Management & Literate Marketplace Newswire Deadline About Us Advertise Legal Terms of Use Privacy Policy Accessibility AdChoices California Privacy Rights Your Privacy Choices EU Privacy Preferences Sitemap TV Film Awards Box Office Business International Connect with Us Get our latest storiesin the feed of your favorite networks Have a Tip? We want to hear from you! Send us a tip using our annonymous form. Send Us a Tip Stay in the Know Sign up for our breaking news alerts Your Email Sign Up By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. PMC Deadline is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2025 Deadline Hollywood, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Powered by WordPress.com VIP Our Sites Art in America Artforum Artnews ATX TV ATX TV Festival BGR Billboard BlogHer Deadline Flow Space Footwear News Gold Derby IndieWire LA3C Life is Beautiful Robb Report Rolling Stone SheKnows Soaps Sourcing Journal Sportico Spy StyleCaster The Hollywood Reporter TVLine Variety Vibe WWD Our Sites Art in America Artforum Artnews ATX TV ATX TV Festival BGR Billboard BlogHer Deadline Flow Space Footwear News Gold Derby IndieWire LA3C Life is Beautiful Robb Report Rolling Stone SheKnows Soaps Sourcing Journal Sportico Spy StyleCaster The Hollywood Reporter TVLine Variety Vibe WWD Site Close the menu deadline-logo-svg TV Expand the sub-menu Castings Ratings Primetime Pilot Panic Late-Night Film Expand the sub-menu Festivals Reviews Castings Acquisitions Documentary Executives Awards Expand the sub-menu Emmys Oscars Tonys Box Office Expand the sub-menu International B.O. Specialty B.O. Broadway B.O. Business Expand the sub-menu ElectionLine Legal Agencies Executives International Expand the sub-menu Festivals Film TV International Insider Video Expand the sub-menu The Film That Lit My Fuse Trailers The Actor's Side Behind The Lens Production Value More Expand the sub-menu Obituaries Podcasts Insider Books Sports Commentary Follow Us Alerts & Newsletters Sign Up By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Advertise About Us Give us feedback Leave us a tip Deadline is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2025 Deadline Hollywood, LLC. All Rights Reserved. ad
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: pearson_cosine, spearman_cosine
model-index: name: SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
results: task: type: semantic-similarity
name: Semantic Similarity
dataset: name: Unknown
type: unknown
metrics: type: pearson_cosine
value: 0.9799696092976358
name: Pearson Cosine
verified: no, type: spearman_cosine
value: 0.8249423833511556
name: Spearman Cosine
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 52
Created: 2025-03-11 09:03:22