Model: martintgc/finetuned_arctic_kg_ft-legal-ft-v0
Author: martintgc
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, bert, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:56, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss, arxiv:1908.10084, arxiv:2205.13147, arxiv:1705.00652, base_model:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l, base_model:finetune:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l, model-index, text-embeddings-inference, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
Card metadata: tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:56, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
widget: source_sentence: How did the fans of KKR feel about McCullum's return to the team?
sentences: are not seeing.At KKR, they get back together and they have a great run in one period, even though Morgan is clearly washed and is never going to make runs again.At this stage – unless you are from KKR, or you've listened to Morgan a lot, or you’ve got McCullum peeled back in the 2015 World Cup – McCullum was an important player, but not the most important. His team didn’t win the World Cup final, and they didn’t go to No.1 in the world. KKR were a really good team when he played for them, but they weren’t a powerhouse. England’s success was linked to McCullum at times, but he wasn't actually the one in charge. Then too, when he came back for KKR, there were lots of KKR fans who weren't particularly happy with the way that the team was, right-hand lead by a boxer. Even if someone tells you they’re going to do it beforehand, it’s such a weird thing to happen that it catches you off guard.And if they hit you in the face, they've hit you in the face. And that's what a lot of Bazball's early success was built on. But now, there's no surprise anymore, it’s completely gone. I assumed that England would bowl more 90-mile-an-hour bowlers, they would bowl more bouncers, and they would up the explosiveness. Even though they were pretty explosive in 2015-19, and even in the period when they were failing after that. They were pretty explosive all the way through, and we knew exactly how England were going to play cricket.That's one of the most fascinating things about all this. Its, We all know what it is, even if some of us still misunderstand it at times and others get a little too excited by it.We also know what Bazball is going to be. Look at what the Australians did when they played that Test series against England. They put their fielders out on the boundary early on and went, okay, now you're going to have to play a slightly different kind of cricket.You can scheme for Bazball. You can plan for Bazball. We understand its strengths and its limits at this point. We also understand that because England believe so much in it, sometimes you can allow them to Bazball themselves out of a game. And that brings us back to England adopting Bazball in limited-overs cricket.To recap: the first version of Bazball was in the, source_sentence: How did Eoin Morgan's relationship with McCullum influence England's performance in white-ball cricket between 2015 and 2019?
sentences: that the team was playing.But the one place that seemed to think about him completely differently was always England.Some of that is just linked to the Morgan relationship. So when McCullum was brought in to be the coach, it was of course to be the coach of the white-ball team. And he said, ‘Nah, I want to try the red-ball team.’This is where it gets really, really fascinating.When he coached the Test team, all he really did was go back and use their plan from 2015-2019. What he essentially did was copying an England plan from 2015-19, based on the England talent pool that was available at that time, that was copied from his original plan. It is a bit of a copy of a copy at that point.Bazball has been discussed more than any cricket, were so good in this period is that they had two quality spinners, and they had a bunch of people who could play spin.By the time they got to white-ball sides also officially adopting Bazball, their ability to bowl spin and play spin had almost completely disappeared. They've tried to disrupt as much as possible, and they stole a Test in India doing it. But, we've also seen the limitations of that, and Pakistan embarrassed them recently. Now, they're back trying to play spin again, and we can see that they don't have it.The genius of Bazball and Brendon McCullum has always been to highlight your strengths and ignore your weaknesses. How do you do that when just playing spin or bowling spin is one of them? That's a hard thing to overcome, he's really good at, which is thrashing the ball around everywhere, played a big part too. So his leadership of New Zealand and the IPL experience actually started to develop together.This is where the third part of it all comes in. Because along comes Eoin Morgan, an Irish cricketer playing in England, who also ended up at KKR. He built a relationship with McCullum and imbibed his ideas. That led to one of the best periods in white-ball cricket ever for England, between 2015 and 2019. They only won one ICC event, which is ridiculous considering how they played in that period. Of course, Carlos Brathwaite took one away from them, and they had a shocking game against Pakistan in the Champions Trophy 2017 semifinal. But if you look at their, source_sentence: What is the main topic discussed in Jarrod Kimber's article "Do teams even play ODIs anymore?"
sentences: about all this. Its main success came from surprise, even if there were lots of tactical nuggets within it. But if you can't play spin, and everyone else knows exactly how you're going to play, you do what India did. In those T20I games, even when India got behind, they waited for England to take chances that they didn't need to take. Because everyone knows how England are going to play. They tell us every chance they get.Bazball, the term? That's new.Bazball, the cricket? Oh we've done it. We've got a prequel in McCullum and Wagner. The cult film that no one watched, when McCullum was doing it with New Zealand subsequently. The sequel that's often been forgotten with the KKR years. The spin off, which was Morgan and England doing it in, shoulder. Over and over again. And you had to make batting decisions.From that, we got the first version of what we would see as Bazball. So this is really a Bazball origins story.And remember that New Zealand were doing terribly, as we said, in South Africa and India, and they started to win a lot. We know how much they eventually won, especially in Test cricket, because they ended up as the world's No.1 team and they won the World Test Championship.Now, a lot of that is not under McCullum, but the very basics that McCullum started with is what they went on with. For instance, Wagner and the funky fields. The other thing that McCullum really brought to that New Zealand side was finding a role for each player based on their strengths. So, Do teams even play ODIs anymore? - by Jarrod Kimber, source_sentence: What innovative bowling technique did Neil Wagner use during his match against India that contributed to his rise as an important cricketer?
sentences: he's really good at, which is thrashing the ball around everywhere, played a big part too. So his leadership of New Zealand and the IPL experience actually started to develop together.This is where the third part of it all comes in. Because along comes Eoin Morgan, an Irish cricketer playing in England, who also ended up at KKR. He built a relationship with McCullum and imbibed his ideas. That led to one of the best periods in white-ball cricket ever for England, between 2015 and 2019. They only won one ICC event, which is ridiculous considering how they played in that period. Of course, Carlos Brathwaite took one away from them, and they had a shocking game against Pakistan in the Champions Trophy 2017 semifinal. But if you look at their, than any cricket concept. Almost ever. We don't have to go through it. Essentially it boils down to two key parts. Disrupt when you bat. And then if you've disrupted well enough, you should be able to pick up singles, like the middle overs back in the 2015-19 years. And when you bowl, try and manufacture wickets. Maybe that is your spinner bowling without a deep backward square leg to encourage someone who doesn't normally sweep to sweep more. Usually, it just means bowling bouncers. In fact, most of Bazball is just bowling bouncers.And if you go back to 2015-19, they had Liam Plunkett, Jofra Archer and Mark Wood all bowling lots of bouncers. Remember, Wagner started with the bouncers. So bouncers are very important, and the disruptive, gloves, and most important to the renaissance was Neil Wagner. At that stage, no one really thought that Wagner was about to become one of the more important cricketers in the world.He kind of became that when he was playing against India in a match, and was struggling to get wickets conventionally. And so, he went with short-pitched bowling. Of course, lots of people have tried short-pitched bowling before. What Wagner did though, was bowl incredibly long spells of short-pitched bowling, and he was very accurate with it. Meanwhile, McCullum set fields that were only set for short-pitched bowling. As a batter, that’s all that was going to happen. You were going to face 60 balls, at 135 kmph, aimed probably at your left shoulder. Over and, source_sentence: Who did the captaincy of the New Zealand cricket team transition from, and how was this change perceived?
sentences: and the disruptive batting is very important.Those are kind of the two key frameworks of what Bazball is. It had some success and some failure, and you can go anywhere you want to have a look at that. We've probably done about 19 videos and pieces looking at it and breaking it down, because it is one of the more fascinating things that has happened in modern cricket.But then what happens after this, of course, is that the white-ball team – which had been really, really good – suddenly starts to suck. And so, they ask McCullum to come over and take over the white-ball sides too. It’s a circle of life, this evolution of Brendon McCullum and his own tactics. Even when other people were using them and changing them, he incorporated their, to be captain, but didn’t get it. Then, he kind of just took the captaincy from Ross Taylor in a bloodless coup. Although some people might say it wasn't particularly bloodless.And then New Zealand went to South Africa, and they had just the worst time. It was really, really bad. So all the players got together and asked themselves hard questions. “What are we doing? Are we going to become freelance players in franchise cricket? Are we going to take New Zealand cricket seriously?”Arising from that, they went all-in on a method that I suppose we would now call Bazball. But it did take a little while to come together. There were lots of different aspects that needed to fall in place. McCullum had to eventually give up the gloves, and most, were so good in this period is that they had two quality spinners, and they had a bunch of people who could play spin.By the time they got to white-ball sides also officially adopting Bazball, their ability to bowl spin and play spin had almost completely disappeared. They've tried to disrupt as much as possible, and they stole a Test in India doing it. But, we've also seen the limitations of that, and Pakistan embarrassed them recently. Now, they're back trying to play spin again, and we can see that they don't have it.The genius of Bazball and Brendon McCullum has always been to highlight your strengths and ignore your weaknesses. How do you do that when just playing spin or bowling spin is one of them? That's a hard thing to overcome
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: cosine_accuracy@1, cosine_accuracy@3, cosine_accuracy@5, cosine_accuracy@10, cosine_precision@1, cosine_precision@3, cosine_precision@5, cosine_precision@10, cosine_recall@1, cosine_recall@3, cosine_recall@5, cosine_recall@10, cosine_ndcg@10, cosine_mrr@10, cosine_map@100
model-index: name: SentenceTransformer based on Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
results: task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: Unknown
type: unknown
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.8571428571428571
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.9642857142857143
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 1
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 1
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.8571428571428571
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.32142857142857145
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.20000000000000004
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.10000000000000002
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.8571428571428571
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.9642857142857143
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 1
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 1
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.9354477166148681
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.9136904761904762
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.9136904761904763
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.925
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.95
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.975
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.975
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.925
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.31666666666666665
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.195
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.0975
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.925
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.95
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.975
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.975
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.9471713201808635
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.9383333333333332
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.9406060606060607
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 10
Created: 2025-02-25 07:15:38