Model: Netta1994/setfit_baai_newrelic_gpt-4o_improved-cot-instructions_chat_few_shot_only_reasoning_17
Author: Netta1994
Pipeline: text-classification
Library: setfit
Tags: setfit, safetensors, bert, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer, arxiv:2209.11055, base_model:BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, base_model:finetune:BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, model-index, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
Card metadata: base_model: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
library_name: setfit
metrics: accuracy
pipeline_tag: text-classification
tags: setfit, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer
widget: Reasoning:
The answer diligently grounds itself with multiple points from the provided document, ensuring it is both specific and detailed. It covers key parts of the performance review process, including self-assessment, peer feedback, consolidation, coaching sessions, and resources. This maintains high relevance and clear grounding in the document.
Evaluation: Good, Reasoning:
The answer is accurately grounded in the provided document and directly addresses the question without deviating into unrelated topics. The email address for contacting regarding travel reimbursement questions is correctly cited from the document.

Final evaluation: Good, Reasoning:
The answer is adequately grounded in the provided document, covering the steps that team leads and employees should take to improve the situation. It includes specific actions such as thinking about someone's time at the company, flagging issues, analyzing problems, providing feedback, trying to fix issues together, and finishing it up if progress isn't made. It also mentions asking for upward feedback and improving work-life balance, which are directly referenced in the documents.

Final Result: Good, Reasoning:
The answer is directly related to the document content, addressing the specific topic of sexual harassment, which includes flirting making colleagues uncomfortable. It covers the importance of creating a respectful environment and mentions the consequences of such actions, which is implicitly grounded in the documents' information. Thus, it meets the criteria of context grounding, relevance, conciseness, and specificity.

Final Result: Good, Reasoning:
The answer provides a general rationale for investing in personal relationships at work. However, it fails to provide specific points or direct references from the documents that explicitly answer the question. Given that the document hints at the importance of personal relationships but does not directly explain the detailed benefits outlined in the answer, the response is considered somewhat speculative and not sufficiently grounded in the provided text.

Final Result: Bad
inference: yes
model-index: name: SetFit with BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
results: task: type: text-classification
name: Text Classification
dataset: name: Unknown
type: unknown
split: test
metrics: type: accuracy
value: 0.5970149253731343
name: Accuracy
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 8
Created: 2024-09-19 13:00:47