Model: research-dump/paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2_wikipedia_stance_wikipedia_stance
Author: research-dump
Pipeline: text-classification
Library: setfit
Tags: setfit, safetensors, bert, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer, arxiv:2209.11055, base_model:sentence-transformers/paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2, base_model:finetune:sentence-transformers/paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: sentence-transformers/paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2
Card metadata: tags: setfit, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer
widget: the staircase is not ''independently'' notable, as fine a staircase as it may have been. For an historical artifact or architectural structure, these are extremely weak sources, and two really border on  in that the importance is asserted by our article and not our source. I could see an extensive and sourced article on ''all'' the ship's notable architecture, but the importance of the staircase is as the nominator states a construct of the James Cameron film ''Titanic, Fails the |general notability guidelines.  While mentions of the company pop up in the news and we can verify its existance, there is no batch of independant reliable third-party sources written about the company to establish its notabilty, WP:V failed due to lack of references making it difficult to establish notability. From what I gather, there is no real claim to notability and the article fails  and the , Meets . &mdash, as the entire article fails , but '''redirect''' to Taz-Mania
metrics: accuracy
pipeline_tag: text-classification
library_name: setfit
inference: yes
base_model: sentence-transformers/paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 15
Created: 2025-02-07 00:00:42