Model: dabraldeepti25/legal-ft-v0
Author: dabraldeepti25
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, bert, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:156, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss, arxiv:1908.10084, arxiv:2205.13147, arxiv:1705.00652, base_model:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l, base_model:finetune:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l, model-index, text-embeddings-inference, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
Card metadata: tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:156, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
widget: source_sentence: How much has the cost of using OpenAI's most expensive model changed compared to the previous pricing?
sentences: Synthetic data as a substantial component of pretraining is becoming increasingly common, and the Phi series of models has consistently emphasized the importance of synthetic data. Rather than serving as a cheap substitute for organic data, synthetic data has several direct advantages over organic data., Here’s the rest of the transcript. It’s bland and generic, but my phone can pitch bland and generic Christmas movies to Netflix now!
LLM prices crashed, thanks to competition and increased efficiency
The past twelve months have seen a dramatic collapse in the cost of running a prompt through the top tier hosted LLMs.
In December 2023 (here’s the Internet Archive for the OpenAI pricing page) OpenAI were charging $30/million input tokens for GPT-4, $10/mTok for the then-new GPT-4 Turbo and $1/mTok for GPT-3.5 Turbo.
Today $30/mTok gets you OpenAI’s most expensive model, o1. GPT-4o is $2.50 (12x cheaper than GPT-4) and GPT-4o mini is $0.15/mTok—nearly 7x cheaper than GPT-3.5 and massively more capable., Then there’s the rest. If you browse the Chatbot Arena leaderboard today—still the most useful single place to get a vibes-based evaluation of models—you’ll see that GPT-4-0314 has fallen to around 70th place. The 18 organizations with higher scoring models are Google, OpenAI, Alibaba, Anthropic, Meta, Reka AI, 01 AI, Amazon, Cohere, DeepSeek, Nvidia, Mistral, NexusFlow, Zhipu AI, xAI, AI21 Labs, Princeton and Tencent.
Training a GPT-4 beating model was a huge deal in 2023. In 2024 it’s an achievement that isn’t even particularly notable, though I personally still celebrate any time a new organization joins that list.
Some of those GPT-4 models run on my laptop, source_sentence: What are some potential consequences of making decisions based on hype and misinformation?
sentences: The GPT-4 barrier was comprehensively broken
In my December 2023 review I wrote about how We don’t yet know how to build GPT-4—OpenAI’s best model was almost a year old at that point, yet no other AI lab had produced anything better. What did OpenAI know that the rest of us didn’t?
I’m relieved that this has changed completely in the past twelve months. 18 organizations now have models on the Chatbot Arena Leaderboard that rank higher than the original GPT-4 from March 2023 (GPT-4-0314 on the board)—70 models in total., I like people who are skeptical of this stuff. The hype has been deafening for more than two years now, and there are enormous quantities of snake oil and misinformation out there. A lot of very bad decisions are being made based on that hype. Being critical is a virtue.
If we want people with decision-making authority to make good decisions about how to apply these tools we first need to acknowledge that there ARE good applications, and then help explain how to put those into practice while avoiding the many unintiutive traps.
(If you still don’t think there are any good applications at all I’m not sure why you made it to this point in the article!), 17th: AI for Data Journalism: demonstrating what we can do with this stuff right now

22nd: Options for accessing Llama 3 from the terminal using LLM



May

8th: Slop is the new name for unwanted AI-generated content

15th: ChatGPT in “4o” mode is not running the new features yet

29th: Training is not the same as chatting: ChatGPT and other LLMs don’t remember everything you say



June

6th: Accidental prompt injection against RAG applications

10th: Thoughts on the WWDC 2024 keynote on Apple Intelligence

17th: Language models on the command-line

21st: Building search-based RAG using Claude, Datasette and Val Town

27th: Open challenges for AI engineering



July

14th: Imitation Intelligence, my keynote for PyCon US 2024, source_sentence: What advancements have been made in multimodal vision and audio/video capabilities in LLMs?
sentences: The year of slop
2024 was the year that the word "slop" became a term of art. I wrote about this in May, expanding on this tweet by @deepfates:, The GPT-4 barrier was comprehensively broken
Some of those GPT-4 models run on my laptop
LLM prices crashed, thanks to competition and increased efficiency
Multimodal vision is common, audio and video are starting to emerge
Voice and live camera mode are science fiction come to life
Prompt driven app generation is a commodity already
Universal access to the best models lasted for just a few short months
“Agents” still haven’t really happened yet
Evals really matter
Apple Intelligence is bad, Apple’s MLX library is excellent
The rise of inference-scaling “reasoning” models
Was the best currently available LLM trained in China for less than $6m?
The environmental impact got better
The environmental impact got much, much worse, Posted 31st December 2024 at 6:07 pm · Follow me on Mastodon or Twitter or subscribe to my newsletter


More recent articles

LLM 0.22, the annotated release notes - 17th February 2025
Run LLMs on macOS using llm-mlx and Apple's MLX framework - 15th February 2025
URL-addressable Pyodide Python environments - 13th February 2025


 


This is Things we learned about LLMs in 2024 by Simon Willison, posted on 31st December 2024.

Part of series LLMs annual review

Stuff we figured out about AI in 2023 - Dec. 31, 2023, 11:59 p.m. 
Things we learned about LLMs in 2024 - Dec. 31, 2024, 6:07 p.m. 



            google
            347


            ai
            1100


            openai
            257, source_sentence: When did the author first run a large language model on their laptop?
sentences: 24th: Notes on the new Claude analysis JavaScript code execution tool

27th: Run a prompt to generate and execute jq programs using llm-jq

29th: You can now run prompts against images, audio and video in your terminal using LLM

30th: W̶e̶e̶k̶n̶o̶t̶e̶s̶  Monthnotes for October



November

4th: Claude 3.5 Haiku

7th: Project: VERDAD—tracking misinformation in radio broadcasts using Gemini 1.5

12th: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is an LLM that can code well that runs on my Mac

19th: Notes from Bing Chat—Our First Encounter With Manipulative AI

25th: Ask questions of SQLite databases and CSV/JSON files in your terminal



December

4th: First impressions of the new Amazon Nova LLMs (via a new llm-bedrock plugin)

7th: Prompts.js, 260 input tokens, 92 output tokens. Cost approximately 0.0024 cents (that’s less than a 400th of a cent).
This increase in efficiency and reduction in price is my single favourite trend from 2024. I want the utility of LLMs at a fraction of the energy cost and it looks like that’s what we’re getting.
Multimodal vision is common, audio and video are starting to emerge
My butterfly example above illustrates another key trend from 2024: the rise of multi-modal LLMs.
A year ago the single most notable example of these was GPT-4 Vision, released at OpenAI’s DevDay in November 2023. Google’s multi-modal Gemini 1.0 was announced on December 7th 2023 so it also (just) makes it into the 2023 window., My personal laptop is a 64GB M2 MacBook Pro from 2023. It’s a powerful machine, but it’s also nearly two years old now—and crucially it’s the same laptop I’ve been using ever since I first ran an LLM on my computer back in March 2023 (see Large language models are having their Stable Diffusion moment).
That same laptop that could just about run a GPT-3-class model in March last year has now run multiple GPT-4 class models! Some of my notes on that:, source_sentence: What notable development in LLM technology occurred in the final quarter of 2024?
sentences: Now that those features are rolling out they’re pretty weak. As an LLM power-user I know what these models are capable of, and Apple’s LLM features offer a pale imitation of what a frontier LLM can do. Instead we’re getting notification summaries that misrepresent news headlines and writing assistant tools that I’ve not found useful at all. Genmoji are kind of fun though.
The rise of inference-scaling “reasoning” models
The most interesting development in the final quarter of 2024 was the introduction of a new shape of LLM, exemplified by OpenAI’s o1 models—initially released as o1-preview and o1-mini on September 12th., The year of slop
Synthetic training data works great
LLMs somehow got even harder to use
Knowledge is incredibly unevenly distributed
LLMs need better criticism
Everything tagged “llms” on my blog in 2024, Prompt injection is a natural consequence of this gulibility. I’ve seen precious little progress on tackling that problem in 2024, and we’ve been talking about it since September 2022.
I’m beginning to see the most popular idea of “agents” as dependent on AGI itself. A model that’s robust against gulliblity is a very tall order indeed.
Evals really matter
Anthropic’s Amanda Askell (responsible for much of the work behind Claude’s Character):
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: cosine_accuracy@1, cosine_accuracy@3, cosine_accuracy@5, cosine_accuracy@10, cosine_precision@1, cosine_precision@3, cosine_precision@5, cosine_precision@10, cosine_recall@1, cosine_recall@3, cosine_recall@5, cosine_recall@10, cosine_ndcg@10, cosine_mrr@10, cosine_map@100
model-index: name: SentenceTransformer based on Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-l
results: task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: Unknown
type: unknown
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.8333333333333334
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 1
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 1
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 1
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.8333333333333334
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.3333333333333333
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.20000000000000004
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.10000000000000002
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.8333333333333334
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 1
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 1
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 1
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.9330328858630988
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.9097222222222222
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.9097222222222222
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 55
Created: 2025-02-18 10:18:01