Model: aaa961/modernbert-embed-base-legal-matryoshka-2
Author: aaa961
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, modernbert, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:5822, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss, en, arxiv:1908.10084, arxiv:2205.13147, arxiv:1705.00652, base_model:nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base, base_model:finetune:nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base, license:apache-2.0, model-index, text-embeddings-inference, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base
Card metadata: language: en
license: apache-2.0
tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:5822, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: nomic-ai/modernbert-embed-base
widget: source_sentence: What document does the plaintiff not ask the Court to direct the DOJ to produce?
sentences: assertions made in the Lutz Declaration.”  See Pl.’s First 443 Opp’n at 6, 11.  Second, the 
plaintiff makes essentially the same argument it made in No. 11-445: the CIA is not entitled to 
summary judgment “because CIA’s Vaughn index entries consist generally of nothing more 
91 
 
informative than a parroting of the statutory standard.”  See id. at 11–12.  With regard to both, does not address this issue in its sur-reply brief in No. 11-445, and because the plaintiff does not ask the Court to 
direct the DOJ to produce Document 3 to the plaintiff, the plaintiff does not appear to continue to challenge the 
DOJ’s decision to withhold Document 3. 
140 
 
recorded decision to implement the opinion.”  Id. at 32. These meeting minutes, which the, The Polaris Solicitations Require the Submission of “Competing 
Offers” at the IDIQ Level, Making 13 C.F.R. § 125.9(b)(3)(i) 
Applicable to this Procurement. 
Plaintiffs’ suggestion that the Polaris Solicitations do not require the submission of 
“competing offers” at the IDIQ level is unavailing.  Such a suggestion conflicts with the plain, source_sentence: What section of the U.S. Code does the CIA Act fall under?
sentences: 29 Cf. KT4 Partners LLC v. Palantir Techs. Inc., 203 A.3d 738, 750 (Del. 2019) 
(“Stockholders of Delaware corporations have ‘a qualified common law and statutory 
right to inspect the corporation's books and records.’”) (citing Saito v. McKesson HBOC, 
Inc., 806 A.2d 113, 116 (Del. 2002)); Cent. Laborers Pension Fund v. News Corp., 45 
A.3d 139, 143 (Del. 2012) (citations omitted)., and the CIA Act, 50 U.S.C. § 403g, see supra Part III.H.1; (2) the CIA’s refusal to 
produce responsive records in an electronic format, see supra Part III.K.1; and (3) the 
CIA’s withholding of the “two-page classified TOC from volume 53 (number 2)” of 
Studies in Intelligence, see Fourth Lutz Decl. ¶ 11, pursuant to Exemption 1, see supra, Ex. B, No. 11-445, ECF No. 53-1. 
The ODNI produced responsive records to the plaintiff on May 27, 2010 and June 21, 
2010, releasing a total of thirty-four pages, in part, with redactions made pursuant to FOIA 
Exemptions 2, 3, 5, and 6.  See Hackett Decl. ¶¶ 11–12, No. 11-445, ECF No. 29-8.  The DIA, source_sentence: What type of costs are estimated using a cost build-up?
sentences: relacionados los tres señalamientos de error, los discutiremos de 
forma conjunta. 
 
 
 
KLAN202300916 
 
18
Es la contención de la parte apelante que, al ser titular del 
material audiovisual en controversia, ostenta todo el derecho de 
desplegarlo en la Internet y en cualquier otro medio bajo la Ley de 
Derecho de Autor federal (Copyright Act).  Arguye que, el reclamo de, references a contractor’s “cost build-up,” which is a tool that businesses may use to assist with 
pricing out products and services.  See, e.g., Charles H. Brandon, Management Accounting 353 
(McGraw-Hill 1997) (describing the concept of a cost build-up within the context of car 
manufacturing).  Businesses prepare cost build-ups to estimate total direct and indirect costs, Defendant disagrees, both with Plaintiffs’ interpretation of 13 C.F.R. § 125.9(b)(3)(i) and 
with Plaintiffs’ understanding of what constitutes a “competing offer.”  Cross-MJAR at 24–37.  
Defendant argues that 13 C.F.R. § 125.9(b)(3)(i) expressly prohibits mentor-protégé JVs with the 
same mentor from competing against one another on future procurements.  Cross-MJAR at 25–26., source_sentence: What theories were mentioned as possible ways to authenticate photographic evidence?
sentences: testimony under the “pictorial testimony” theory of authentication.  See id. at 632 n.21, 292 
A.3d at 437 n.21.  The Appellate Court explained that “all photographic evidence, 
including video evidence, may be authenticated under several theories, including the 
‘pictorial testimony’ theory and the ‘silent witness’ theory[.]”  Id. at 630, 292 A.3d at 435 
- 26 - 
(citations omitted).11, Management Services; or (5) Other Computer Related Services.  AR at 1095–96, 2134–35, 2625–
26.  All offerors must submit a minimum of three and maximum of five Primary Relevant 
Experience Projects as part of their proposals.  See AR at 1094, 2133, 2625.  Additionally, the 
Solicitations evaluate Past Performance “using Projects submitted under [the] Primary Experience, [PROSECUTOR]: He’s authenticated it as to be the date and the time of the
 
incident, it was a true and accurate reflection of that date and time. 
 
THE COURT: There are other questions you need to ask him, like, has he
 
watched it. 
 
[PROSECUTOR]: Okay. 
 
THE COURT: And is it a fair and accurate representation of what happened. 
I mean, I’m not trying -- 
 
[PROSECUTOR]: Okay., source_sentence: What motion did the court grant?
sentences: advance the development of artificial intelligence . . . to comprehensively address the national 
security and defense needs of the United States.”  Id. § 1051(b)(1).  The Commission must report 
its findings and recommendations to the President and Congress.  Id. § 1051(c)(1). 
The Commission was originally set to end this October, but Congress recently extended, failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted.  The court 
granted the motion.  
 
5 
II. 
The Court Did Not Err by Dismissing the Case 
¶ 10 
Al-Hamim contends that the court erred by granting the 
landlords’ motion to dismiss.  Specifically, he argues that the court 
erred by determining that the landlords did not breach the warranty, portions of a given record, the CIA must provide an explanation for why the privilege applies to 
each portion that is withheld. 
The three deficiencies described above preclude summary judgment to the CIA as to the 
invocation of the attorney-client privilege to withhold twenty-three documents in full in No. 11-
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: cosine_accuracy@1, cosine_accuracy@3, cosine_accuracy@5, cosine_accuracy@10, cosine_precision@1, cosine_precision@3, cosine_precision@5, cosine_precision@10, cosine_recall@1, cosine_recall@3, cosine_recall@5, cosine_recall@10, cosine_ndcg@10, cosine_mrr@10, cosine_map@100
model-index: name: ModernBERT Embed base Legal Matryoshka
results: task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 768
type: dim_768
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.5486862442040186
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.6027820710973725
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.6877897990726429
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.7727975270479135
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.5486862442040186
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.5208655332302936
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.39629057187016997
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.23261205564142196
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.1980937660999485
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.5197063369397218
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.6441267387944358
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.7573415765069552
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.6573523177306765
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.5991272294595321
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.6390635663224541
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 512
type: dim_512
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.5517774343122102
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.5919629057187017
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.6831530139103554
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.7666151468315301
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.5517774343122102
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.5188047398248326
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.3913446676970634
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.23153013910355488
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.19796496651210713
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.5164863472436888
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.6382019577537352
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.7551519835136529
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.6552822545556243
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.5981348593017833
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.6365187551756225
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 256
type: dim_256
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.508500772797527
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.5579598145285936
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.652241112828439
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.7217928902627512
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.508500772797527
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.48377125193199383
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.37156105100463677
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.21684698608964453
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.1826378155589902
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.48209685729005664
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.6047140649149922
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.7069809376609996
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.6125310311283103
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.5574777360712446
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.6001381019118311
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 128
type: dim_128
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.44513137557959814
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.4884080370942813
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.5780525502318392
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.6537867078825348
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.44513137557959814
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.4260690365790829
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.3316846986089645
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.19814528593508499
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.1581658938691396
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.4205306543019063
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.538382277176713
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.6439979392065944
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.5484597944862
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.4923627977723803
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.5357027283465807
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 64
type: dim_64
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.3384853168469861
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.3740340030911901
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.4559505409582689
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.527047913446677
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.3384853168469861
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.315816589386914
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.24914992272024727
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.15842349304482226
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.1273827923750644
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.32380216383307575
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.4125450798557445
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.5137815558990211
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.43025698294460923
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.37891550747037606
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.4231606545039004
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 6
Created: 2025-05-13 14:23:51