Model: IoannisKat1/legal-bert-base-uncased-legal-matryoshka
Author: IoannisKat1
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, bert, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:1580, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss, en, arxiv:1908.10084, arxiv:2205.13147, arxiv:1705.00652, base_model:nlpaueb/legal-bert-base-uncased, base_model:finetune:nlpaueb/legal-bert-base-uncased, license:apache-2.0, model-index, text-embeddings-inference, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: nlpaueb/legal-bert-base-uncased
Card metadata: language: en
license: apache-2.0
tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:1580, loss:MatryoshkaLoss, loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: nlpaueb/legal-bert-base-uncased
widget: source_sentence: What action did the plaintiff take without undue delay?
sentences: This Regulation allows the principle of public access to official documents to be taken into account when applying this Regulation. Public access to official documents may be considered to be in the public interest. Personal data in documents held by a public authority or a public body should be able to be publicly disclosed by that authority or body if the disclosure is provided for by Union or Member State law to which the public authority or public body is subject. Such laws should reconcile public access to official documents and the reuse of public sector information with the right to the protection of personal data and may therefore provide for the necessary reconciliation with the right to the protection of personal data pursuant to this Regulation. The reference to public authorities and bodies should in that context include all authorities or other bodies covered by Member State law on public access to documents. Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) leaves intact and in no way affects the level of protection of natural persons with regard to the 4.5.2016 L 119/28 Official Journal of the European Union EN, 1.Any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of an infringement of this Regulation shall have the right to receive compensation from the controller or processor for the damage suffered.
2.Any controller involved in processing shall be liable for the damage caused by processing which infringes this Regulation. A processor shall be liable for the damage caused by processing only where it has not complied with obligations of this Regulation specifically directed to processors or where it has acted outside or contrary to lawful instructions of the controller.
3.A controller or processor shall be exempt from liability under paragraph 2 if it proves that it is not in any way responsible for the event giving rise to the damage.
4.Where more than one controller or processor, or both a controller and a processor, are involved in the same processing and where they are, under paragraphs 2 and 3, responsible for any damage caused by processing, each controller or processor shall be held liable for the entire damage in order to ensure effective compensation of the data subject.
5.Where a controller or processor has, in accordance with paragraph 4, paid full compensation for the damage suffered, that controller or processor shall be entitled to claim back from the other controllers or processors involved in the same processing that part of the compensation corresponding to their part of responsibility for the damage, in accordance with the conditions set out in paragraph 2
6.Court proceedings for exercising the right to receive compensation shall be brought before the courts competent under the law of the Member State referred to in Article 79(2)., **Court (Civil/Criminal): Civil**  
**Provisions:**  
**Time of commission of the act:**  
**Outcome (not guilty, guilty):**  
**Reasoning:** Partially accepts the lawsuit.  
**Facts:** The plaintiff, who works as a lawyer, maintains a savings account with the defendant banking corporation under account number GR.............. Pursuant to a contract dated June 11, 2010, established in Thessaloniki between the defendant and the plaintiff, the plaintiff was granted access to the electronic banking system (e-banking) to conduct banking transactions remotely. On October 10, 2020, the plaintiff fell victim to electronic fraud through the "phishing" method, whereby an unknown perpetrator managed to extract and transfer €3,000.00 from the plaintiff’s account to another account of the same bank. Specifically, on that day at 6:51 a.m., the plaintiff received an email from the sender ".........", with the address ..........., informing him that his debit card had been suspended and that online payments and cash withdrawals could not be made until the issue was resolved. The email urged him to confirm his details within the next 72 hours by following a link titled "card activation."  
The plaintiff read the above email on his mobile phone around 8:00 a.m., and believing it came from the defendant, he followed the instructions and accessed a website that was identical (a clone) to that of the defendant. On this page, he was asked to enter his login credentials to connect to the service, which he did, and he was subsequently asked to input his debit card details for the alleged activation, which he also provided. Then, to complete the process, a number was sent to his mobile phone at 8:07 a.m. from the sender ........, which he entered, and two minutes later he received a message from the same sender in English stating that the quick access code had been activated on his mobile. A few minutes later, at 8:18 a.m., he received an email from the defendant informing him of the transfer of €3,000.00 from his account to account number GR ........... held at the same bank, with the beneficiary's details being .......... As soon as the plaintiff read this, he immediately called the defendant's call center and canceled his debit card, the access codes for the service ......., and locked the application .......... At the same time, he verbally submitted a request to dispute and cancel the contested transaction, and in a subsequent phone call, he also canceled his credit card. On the same day, he also sent an email to the defendant informing them in writing of the above and requesting the cancellation of the transaction and the return of the amount of €3,000.00 to his account, as this transfer was not made by him but by an unknown perpetrator through electronic fraud and was not approved by him. It should also be noted that the plaintiff, as the sole beneficiary according to the aforementioned contract for using the defendant's Internet Banking service, never received any update via SMS or the VIBER application from the bank regarding the transaction details before its completion, nor did he receive a one-time code (OTP) to approve the contested transaction. He subsequently filed a complaint against unknown persons at the Cyber Crime Division for the crime of fraud. The defendant sent an email to the plaintiff on October 16, 2020, informing him that his request had been forwarded to the appropriate department of the bank for investigation, stating that the bank would never send him an email or SMS asking him to enter his personal data and that as of October 7, 2020, there was a notice posted for its customers regarding malicious attempts to steal personal data in the "Our News" section on ....... A month after the disputed incident, on November 10, 2020, an amount of €2,296.82 was transferred to the plaintiff's account from the account to which the fraudulent credit had been made. The plaintiff immediately sent an email to the defendant asking to be informed whether this transfer was a return of part of the amount that had been illegally withdrawn from his account and requested the return of the remaining amount of €703.18. In its response dated January 13, 2021, the defendant confirmed that the aforementioned amount indeed came from the account to which the fraudulent credit had been made, following a freeze of that account initiated by the defendant during the investigation of the incident, but refused to return the remaining amount, claiming it bore no responsibility for the leak of the personal codes to third parties, according to the terms of the service contract established between them.  
From the entirety of the evidence presented to the court, there is no indication of the authenticity of the contested transaction, as the plaintiff did not give his consent for the execution of the transfer of the amount of €3,000.00, especially in light of the provision in Article 72 paragraph 2 of Law 4537/2018 stating that the mere use of the Internet Banking service by the plaintiff does not necessarily constitute sufficient evidence that the payer approved the payment action. Specifically, it was proven that the contested transaction was not carried out following a strong identification of the plaintiff – the sole beneficiary of the account – and his approval, as the latter may have entered his personal codes on the counterfeit website; however, he was never informed, before the completion of the contested transaction, of the amount that would be transferred from his account to a third-party account, nor did he receive on his mobile phone, either via SMS or through the VIBER application or any other means, the one-time code - extra PIN for its completion, which he was required to enter to approve the contested transaction (payment action) and thus complete his identification, a fact that was not countered by any evidence from the defendant. Furthermore, it is noted that the defendant's claims that it bears no responsibility under the terms of the banking services contract, whereby it is not liable for any damage to its customer in cases of unauthorized use of their personal access codes to the Internet Banking service, are to be rejected as fundamentally unfounded. This is because the aforementioned contractual terms are invalid according to the provision of Article 103 of Law 4537/2018, as they contradict the provisions of Articles 71, 73, and 92 of the same Law, which provide for the provider's universal liability and its exemption only for unusual and unforeseen circumstances that are beyond the control of the party invoking them and whose consequences could not have been avoided despite all efforts to the contrary; these provisions establish mandatory law in favor of users, as according to Article 103 of Law 4537/2018, payment service providers are prohibited from deviating from the provisions to the detriment of payment service users, unless the possibility of deviation is explicitly provided and they can decide to offer only more favorable terms to payment service users; the aforementioned contractual terms do not constitute more favorable terms but rather disadvantageous terms for the payment service user. In this case, however, the defendant did not prove the authenticity of the transaction and its approval by the plaintiff and did not invoke, nor did any unusual and unforeseen circumstances beyond its control, the consequences of which could not have been avoided despite all efforts to the contrary, come to light. Therefore, the contested transaction transferring the amount of €3,000.00 is considered, in the absence of demonstrable consent from the plaintiff, unapproved according to the provisions of Article 64 of Law 4537/2018, and the defendant's contrary claims are rejected, especially since the plaintiff proceeded, according to Article 71 paragraph 1 of Law 4537/2018, without undue delay to notify the defendant regarding the contested unapproved payment action. Consequently, the defendant is liable for compensating the plaintiff for the positive damage he suffered under Article 73 of Law 4537/2018 and is obliged to pay him the requested amount of €703.18, while the plaintiff’s fault in the occurrence of this damage cannot be established, as he entered his personal details in an online environment that was a faithful imitation of that of the defendant, as evidenced by the comparison of the screenshots of the fake website and the real website provided by the plaintiff, a fact that he could not have known while being fully convinced that he was transacting with the defendant. Furthermore, the defendant’s liability to compensate the plaintiff is based on the provision of Article 8 of Law 2251/1994, which applies in this case, as the plaintiff's damage resulted from inadequate fulfillment of its obligations in the context of providing its services, but also on the provision of Article 914 of the Civil Code in the sense of omission on its part of unlawfully and culpably imposed actions. In this case, given that during the relevant period there had been a multitude of similar incidents of fraud against the defendant's customers, the latter, as a service provider to the consumer public and bearing transactional obligations of care and security towards them, displayed gross negligence regarding the security provided for electronic transaction services, which was compromised by the fraudulent theft of funds, as it did not comply with all required high-security measures for executing the contested transaction, failing to implement the strict customer identification verification process and to check the authenticity of the account to which the funds were sent, thus not assuming the suspicious nature of the transaction, did not adopt comprehensive and improved protective measures to fully protect its customers against malicious attacks and online fraud and to prevent the infiltration of unauthorized third parties, nor did it fulfill its obligations to inform, accurately inform, and warn its consumers - customers, as it failed to adequately inform them of attempts to steal their personal data through the sending of informative emails or SMS, while merely posting in a section rather than on a central banner (as it later did) does not constitute adequate information such that it meets the requirement of protecting its customers and the increased safeguarding of their interests. Although the plaintiff acted promptly and informed the defendant on the same day about the contested incident, the defendant did not act as promptly regarding the investigation of the incident and the freezing of the account that held the fraudulent credit to prevent the plaintiff's loss, but only returned part of the funds to the plaintiff a month later. This behavior, beyond being culpable due to gross negligence, was also unlawful, as it would have been illegal even without the contractual relationship, as contrary to the provisions of Law 4537/2018 and Law 2251/1994, regarding the lack of security of the services that the consumer is legitimately entitled to expect, as well as the building of trust that is essential in banking transactions, elements that it was obligated to provide within the sphere of the services offered, and contrary to the principles of good faith and commercial ethics, as crystallized in the provision of Article 288 of the Civil Code, as well as the general duty imposed by Article 914 of the Civil Code not to cause harm to another culpably. This resulted not only in positive damage to the plaintiff but also in causing him moral harm consisting of his mental distress and the disruption, agitation, and sorrow he experienced, for which he must be awarded financial compensation. Taking into account all the general circumstances of the case, the extent of the plaintiff's damage, the severity of the defendant's fault, the mental distress suffered by the plaintiff, the insecurity he felt regarding his deposits, the sorrow he experienced, and the stress caused by his financial loss, which occurred during the pandemic period when his earnings from his professional activity had significantly decreased, as well as the financial and social situation of the parties, it is the court's opinion that he should be granted, as financial compensation for his moral harm, an amount of €250.00, which is deemed reasonable and fair. Therefore, the total monetary amount that the plaintiff is entitled to for his positive damage and financial compensation for the moral harm suffered amounts to a total of (€703.18 + €250.00) = €953.18., source_sentence: Who should apply the cooperation mechanism in cases of cross-border relevance?
sentences: The application of such mechanism should be a condition for the lawfulness of a measure intended to produce legal effects by a supervisory authority in those cases where its application is mandatory. In other cases of cross- border relevance, the cooperation mechanism between the lead supervisory authority and supervisory authorities concerned should be applied and mutual assistance and joint operations might be carried out between the supervisory authorities concerned on a bilateral or multilateral basis without triggering the consistency mechanism., A personal data breach may, if not addressed in an appropriate and timely manner, result in physical, material or non-material damage to natural persons such as loss of control over their personal data or limitation of their rights, discrimination, identity theft or fraud, financial loss, unauthorised reversal of pseudonymisation, damage to reputation, loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy or any other significant economic or social disadvantage to the natural person concerned. Therefore, as soon as the controller becomes 4.5.2016 L 119/16 Official Journal of the European Union EN   aware that a personal data breach has occurred, the controller should notify the personal data breach to the supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, unless the controller is able to demonstrate, in accordance with the accountability principle, that the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Where such notification cannot be achieved within 72 hours, the reasons for the delay should accompany the notification and information may be provided in phases without undue further delay., 1.Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.
2.Paragraph 1 shall not apply if one of the following applies: (a)  the data subject has given explicit consent to the processing of those personal data for one or more specified purposes, except where Union or Member State law provide that the prohibition referred to in paragraph 1 may not be lifted by the data subject; (b)  processing is necessary for the purposes of carrying out the obligations and exercising specific rights of the controller or of the data subject in the field of employment and social security and social protection law in so far as it is authorised by Union or Member State law or a collective agreement pursuant to Member State law providing for appropriate safeguards for the fundamental rights and the interests of the data subject; (c)  processing is necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person where the data subject is physically or legally incapable of giving consent; (d)  processing is carried out in the course of its legitimate activities with appropriate safeguards by a foundation, association or any other not-for-profit body with a political, philosophical, religious or trade union aim and on condition that the processing relates solely to the members or to former members of the body or to persons who have regular contact with it in connection with its purposes and that the personal data are not disclosed outside that body without the consent of the data subjects; (e)  processing relates to personal data which are manifestly made public by the data subject; (f)  processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims or whenever courts are acting in their judicial capacity; (g)  processing is necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law which shall be proportionate to the aim pursued, respect the essence of the right to data protection and provide for suitable and specific measures to safeguard the fundamental rights and the interests of the data subject; (h)  processing is necessary for the purposes of preventive or occupational medicine, for the assessment of the working capacity of the employee, medical diagnosis, the provision of health or social care or treatment or the management of health or social care systems and services on the basis of Union or Member State law or pursuant to contract with a health professional and subject to the conditions and safeguards referred to in paragraph 3; (i)  processing is necessary for reasons of public interest in the area of public health, such as protecting against serious cross-border threats to health or ensuring high standards of quality and safety of health care and of medicinal products or medical devices, on the basis of Union or Member State law which provides for suitable and specific measures to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the data subject, in particular professional secrecy; 4.5.2016 L 119/38   (j)  processing is necessary for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes in accordance with Article 89(1) based on Union or Member State law which shall be proportionate to the aim pursued, respect the essence of the right to data protection and provide for suitable and specific measures to safeguard the fundamental rights and the interests of the data subject.
3.Personal data referred to in paragraph 1 may be processed for the purposes referred to in point (h) of paragraph 2 when those data are processed by or under the responsibility of a professional subject to the obligation of professional secrecy under Union or Member State law or rules established by national competent bodies or by another person also subject to an obligation of secrecy under Union or Member State law or rules established by national competent bodies.
4.Member States may maintain or introduce further conditions, including limitations, with regard to the processing of genetic data, biometric data or data concerning health., source_sentence: What system breaches were indicated when the defendant identified the plaintiff's identity?
sentences: Court (Civil/Criminal): Criminal  
Provisions: Article 386 of the Penal Code  
Time of commission of the act:  
Result (innocent, guilty):  
Reasoning: Conviction for computer fraud committed repeatedly and professionally with a total benefit and damage exceeding €30,000. According to the majority opinion, the charge is substantiated in both its objective and subjective aspects, and the defendant must be declared guilty of the aforementioned criminal acts of fraud by means of a computer, committed repeatedly by a perpetrator acting professionally, where the total financial benefit and corresponding damage exceed the amount of €30,000, as well as for repeated embezzlement.

Facts: The defendant accessed a website using a computer, employing, without the knowledge and consent of the complainants, the access codes for the electronic management system of the bank accounts held by the complainants at a Bank, and transferred money through electronically transmitted orders from the complainants' accounts to her own account. Specifically, during the period from June 2007 to June 2008, after unlawfully acquiring the aforementioned STICK containing the access codes, she accessed a website maintained by ..., using, without the complainants' knowledge (without their consent or approval), the access codes for the electronic management system of the bank accounts held at the aforementioned Bank, transferring through electronically transmitted orders to the joint account number ... of the complainants from bank accounts numbered ..., ..., and ..., the total amount of €55,710, as detailed in the orders, and subsequently, using an ATM card, she gradually withdrew from the aforementioned account number ..., the total amount of €55,710, making 84 individual withdrawals from automatic teller machines. In addition, the defendant, during the period from June 2008 to November 2008, in the same exact manner (through the electronic management system of the bank accounts), transferred through electronically transmitted orders to account number ..., which she had opened at ..., from the complainants' bank accounts numbered ..., ..., ..., ..., and ..., the total amount of €73,942, as detailed in the orders regarding the transfers of these amounts. Furthermore, during the period from February 2008 to November 2008, through multiple acts constituting a continuation of the crime, although she had received from the first complainant ... the amounts of €695.04, €695.04, and €845.04, in order to pay his insurance contributions to O.A.E.E. for the periods of January-February 2008, May-June 2008, and September-October 2008, as well as the amounts of €250 and €280, in order to settle credit card bills for "...", respectively, and from the second complainant ... she received the amounts of €283.64, €419.26, and €385.38, to pay the latter's insurance contributions to O.A.E.E. for the periods of July-August 2007, May-June 2008, September-October 2008, and November-December 2008, as well as the amount of €1,888.03 for the settlement of VAT, she never paid the above amounts to settle the aforementioned obligations, nor did she return them to the complainants, despite being urged to do so, but incorporated them into her assets and wrongfully appropriated them. The defendant denies the charges against her and claims that the withdrawals were made by the second complainant and that all the amounts transferred to her account were transferred to cover the company's expenses and their personal expenses, due to her cohabitation with the second complainant and with his knowledge, with whom she intended to marry. However, this claim is not supported by any evidence; on the contrary, it emerged that she conducted the transfers of the money and withdrawals without the complainants' knowledge, and when she learned that they had been informed about the account movements and met at the Bank, her behavior and demeanor indicated guilt, according to the testimony of the prosecution witness ..., an employee of the Pangrati branch of ..., who saw her on the same day at the aforementioned Bank when she met with the complainants. The ongoing act of fraud using a computer was committed by the defendant professionally, as evidenced by her repeated commission of the act, as well as the infrastructure she had established with the intent of repeated commission, based on a specific plan and methodology (transferring smaller amounts to a joint account of the complainants from the remaining accounts of the latter, and then withdrawing the transferred amounts with an ATM card, as well as directly transferring smaller amounts from the complainants' accounts to her personal account she had opened at the same bank), indicating her purpose to generate income, with the financial benefit she gained, corresponding to the complainants' damage, exceeding a total of €30,000., In order to strengthen and harmonise administrative penalties for infringements of this Regulation, each supervisory authority should have the power to impose administrative fines. This Regulation should indicate 4.5.2016 L 119/27 Official Journal of the European Union EN, **Court (Civil/Criminal): Civil  
Provisions:  
Time of commission of the act:  
Outcome (not guilty, guilty): Rejects the lawsuit.  
Reasoning:  
Facts: The plaintiff holds account number ....................... at the defendant bank. Following the application/contract dated January 9, 2019, the plaintiff became a subscriber to the alternative service networks provided by the defendant bank through online banking (.........................). In the aforementioned application, the plaintiff stated that her mobile phone (number .................) would be used by the defendant to send additional security codes for the approval of her transactions via .......................... It is noted that the plaintiff received subscriber code .................., thus enabling her to conduct transactions without her physical presence at the branches of the defendant bank, from fixed or mobile devices (computers, smartphones, tablets), by entering her username and password to access her personal account. Regarding the identification methods, these were agreed upon between the parties and are specified depending on the payment method used. More specifically, the plaintiff had installed the application ...................................... on her mobile phone. According to the terms of the above contract between the parties, the defendant bank (to ensure the protection of its customers in using this application) requires three stages of identification: 1) the input of the customer's personal codes (username and password) in the application .........................., 2) the input of a six-digit code (...................) sent via SMS to the mobile number provided by the customer, to complete the login to ............................. and 3) the input of a new six-digit code (.................) sent in a new SMS to the mobile number provided by the customer, to authenticate the device on which the aforementioned application is installed (usually a mobile phone). 

Furthermore, it was established that on October 4, 2021, at 00:07, the plaintiff received a text message (SMS) on her mobile phone (number ...................) with the following content: ".................................", i.e., "..........: a payment was attempted from a new device. If this was not you, please visit...", providing the above link. As she acknowledges in her lawsuit, she followed the link that was sent to her via SMS and entered her login credentials (i.e., username and password) on the (fake) page she was redirected to. Thus, the perpetrators acquired the plaintiff's personal information and subsequently entered it into the application ........................... that they had installed on their own mobile phone. Following this, to complete the second stage of the process, as described above, the defendant bank sent the aforementioned date and time of 00:14, a security code to the plaintiff's mobile phone via SMS, with the content ".................................`." Subsequently, the defendant sent, at 00:17, another SMS to the plaintiff's mobile phone with the security code .................., containing the message ".........................................", to complete the third stage of identification. It is noted that the defendant sent another message to the plaintiff's mobile phone at 00:15, specifically "..........................", which was not used (perhaps because it was entered incorrectly by the plaintiff). It was later proven that the unknown perpetrators charged the plaintiff's account with a total amount of €2,800.00 and an equivalent credit to a bank account held similarly at the defendant bank, with the beneficiary being ............. The plaintiff contacted the defendant, submitting a dispute over the above transactions and simultaneously filed a complaint against any responsible party for the crimes of fraud and embezzlement. The defendant locked the plaintiff's subscription and provided her with new codes, warning her not to use the aforementioned application via her mobile phone unless she scanned it with updated antivirus/antispyware/malware software. Additionally, the defendant froze the account to which her money was transferred, which, as mentioned earlier, belongs to ................., who also stated that she fell victim to electronic fraud, being used by the aforementioned perpetrators as a front person. It was further established that the above-mentioned ......................... consented to the return to the plaintiff of the amount of €239.54, which remained in her account (as part of the aforementioned €2,800.00), while the plaintiff stated in a declaration that after the crediting of her account with the amount of €239.54, she has no further claims against the defendant regarding the above history. From the above proven facts, it was established that the plaintiff accessed the fraudulent page, entering her username and password and subsequently the codes ....., which were sent to her mobile phone by the defendant bank. Regarding the defendant, it was established that through its website ......................, through the login page to ................ and via messages to its subscribers, it informs them in detail about the risks of code interception and the protective measures they should take, while it also informs them with a special announcement about phishing. For this reason, the plaintiff's assertion that the perpetrators used one-time codes ......, violating the defendant's security systems, must be dismissed as unfounded. Therefore, since the defendant successfully identified the plaintiff's identity as well as her mobile phone without any indication of a breach of its electronic systems, the defendant is not liable for the plaintiff's loss from the transfer of funds to an unknown person's account, nor is it responsible for compensating that loss. Given these circumstances, the lawsuit must be dismissed as fundamentally unfounded.**, source_sentence: Where can disputes be mediated or resolved?
sentences: Member State law or collective agreements, including ‘works agreements’, may provide for specific rules on the processing of employees' personal data in the employment context, in particular for the conditions under which personal data in the employment context may be processed on the basis of the consent of the employee, the purposes of the recruitment, the performance of the contract of employment, including discharge of obligations laid down by law or by collective agreements, management, planning and organisation of work, equality and diversity in the workplace, health and safety at work, and for the purposes of the exercise and enjoyment, on an individual or collective basis, of rights and benefits related to employment, and for the purpose of the termination of the employment relationship., 1.The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her.
2.Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the decision: (a)  is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller; (b)  is authorised by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or (c)  is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
3.In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.
4.Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 9(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 9(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place. Section 5 Restrictions, The term technological measures means any technology, device or component designed to prevent or restrict unauthorized acts in respect of works or other subject-matter. Effective measures include access control or protection processes like encryption or copy control mechanisms.
It is prohibited to circumvent effective technological measures without permission from the rightholder, when done knowingly or with reasonable grounds to know.
It is prohibited to manufacture, import, distribute, sell, rent, advertise, or possess for commercial purposes devices or services intended to circumvent technological measures.
Violation of the provisions is punishable by imprisonment of at least one year and a fine of 2,900 to 15,000 Euro. It also entails civil sanctions under article 65 of Law 2121/1993.
Rightholders must ensure exceptions for reproduction for private use, teaching, libraries, judicial purposes, or accessibility for people with disabilities. Disputes may be mediated or resolved by the Court of Appeal of Athens.
, source_sentence: What should be established by law?
sentences: Any person who intentionally produces, distributes, publishes, imports or exports, transfers, offers, sells or in other way distributes, supplies with, purchases, obtains, acquires or owns child pornographic material or spreads or broadcasts information concerning executions of such actions, is sentenced to at least one year’s imprisonment and a fine of ten to one hundred thousand Euros.
Any person who intentionally produces, offers, sells or in any way distributes, transfers, purchases, obtains or acquires child pornographic material or broadcasts information concerning the executions of such actions through a computer system or through the Internet is sentenced to at least two years’ imprisonment and a fine of fifty to three hundred thousand Euros.
Pornographic material in the sense of the above mentioned paragraphs consists of any representation or an actual or virtual depiction, in electronic or any other form of material, of the body of or part of the body of a minor, aimed at causing sexual stimulation, as well as a recording or depiction of an actual or virtual carnal act that arises sexual stimulation by or with a minor.
Actions of the first and second paragraph are punishable by imprisonment of up to ten years and a fine of fifty to one hundred thousand Euros if: are professionally or habitually committed; the production of child pornographic material is connected to the exploiting of the need, mental or intellectual weakness or corporal dysfunction of the minor due to organic disease or by exercise or threat of violence or using a minor under the age of fifteen.
If such an act as described in case b) resulted in grievous bodily harm to the victim, it will entail a sentence of at least ten years' imprisonment and a fine of one hundred thousand to five hundred thousand Euros. If, however, such an act resulted in the victim’s death, then life imprisonment is imposed.
, Where a Member State establishes several supervisory authorities, it should establish by law mechanisms for ensuring the effective participation of those supervisory authorities in the consistency mechanism. That Member State should in particular designate the supervisory authority which functions as a single contact point for the effective participation of those authorities in the mechanism, to ensure swift and smooth cooperation with other supervisory authorities, the Board and the Commission., Any person who, in contravention of the provisions of this law or of the provisions of lawfully ratified multilateral international conventions on the protection of copyright, unlawfully makes a fixation of a work or of copies, reproduces them directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently in any form, in whole or in part, translates, adapts, alters or transforms them, or distributes them to the public by sale or other means, or possesses with the intent of distributing them, rents, performs in public, broadcasts by radio or television or any other means, communicates to the public works or copies by any means, imports copies of a work illegally produced abroad without the consent of the author and, in general, exploits works, reproductions or copies being the object of copyright or acts against the moral right of the author to decide freely on the publication and the presentation of his work to the public without additions or deletions, shall be liable to imprisonment of no less than a year and to a fine from 2.900-15.000 Euro.
Without the permission of the performers: fixes their performance; directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently reproduces by any means and form, in whole or in part, the fixation of their performance; distributes to the public the fixation of their performance or possesses them with the purpose of distribution; rents the fixation of their performance; broadcasts by radio and television by any means, the live performance, unless such broadcasting is rebroadcasting of a legitimate broadcasting; communicates to the public the live performance made by any means, except radio and television broadcasting; makes available to the public, by wire or wireless means, in such a way that members of the public may access them from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, the fixation of their performance.
Without the permission of phonogram producers (producers of sound recordings): directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently reproduces by any means and form, in whole or in part, their phonograms; distributes to the public the above recordings, or possesses them with the purpose of distribution; rents the said recordings; makes available to the public, by wire or wireless means, in such a way that members of the public may access them from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, their phonograms; imports the said recordings produced abroad without their consent.
Without the permission of producers of audiovisual works (producers of visual or sound and visual recordings): directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently reproduces by any means and form, in whole or in part, the original and the copies of their films; distributes to the public the above recordings, including the copies thereof, or possesses them with the purpose of distribution; rents the said recordings; makes available to the public, by wire or wireless means, in such a way that members of the public may access them from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, the original and the copies of their films; imports the said recordings produced abroad without their consent; broadcasts by radio or television by any means including satellite transmission and cable retransmission, as well as the communication to the public.
Without the permission of radio and television organizations: rebroadcasts their broadcasts by any means; presents their broadcasts to the public in places accessible to the public against payment of an entrance fee; fixes their broadcasts on sound or sound and visual recordings, regardless of whether the broadcasts are transmitted by wire or by the air, including by cable or satellite; directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently reproduces by any means and form, in whole or in part, the fixation of their broadcasts; distributes to the public the recordings containing the fixation or their broadcasts; rents the recordings containing the fixation of their broadcasts; makes available to the public, by wire or wireless means, in such a way that members of the public may access them from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, the fixation of their broadcasts.
If the financial gain sought or the damage caused by the perpetration of an act listed in paragraphs (1) and (2), above, is particularly great, the sanction shall be not less than two years imprisonment and a fine of from 2 to 10 million drachmas. If the guilty party has perpetrated any of the aforementioned acts by profession or at a commercial scale or if the circumstances in connection with the perpetration of the act indicate that the guilty party poses a serious threat to the protection of copyright or related rights, the sanction shall be imprisonment of up to ten (10) years and a fine of from 5 to 10 million drachmas, together with the withdrawal of the trading license of the undertaking which has served as the vehicle for the act. The act shall be likewise deemed to have been perpetrated by way of standard practice if the guilty party has on a previous occasion been convicted of a contravention pursuant to the provisions of the Article or for a violation of the preceding copyright legislation and sentenced to a non-redeemable period of imprisonment. Any infringement of copyright and related rights in the form of felony is tried by the competent Three-member Court of Appeal for Felonies.
Any person who did not pay the remuneration provided for by Article 18, paragraph (3) hereof to a collecting society is punished with the sanction of paragraph (1), (2) and (3). The same sentence is imposed on the debtor who, after the issuance of the decision of the one-member first instance court, does not submit the declaration under the provisions of article 18, par. 6, of this law.
The sanctions specified in paragraph (1), above, shall be applicable likewise to any person who: uses or distributes, or possesses with the intent to distribute, any system or means whose sole purpose is to facilitate the unpermitted removal or neutralization of a technical system used to protect a computer program; manufactures or imports or distributes, or possesses with intent to distribute, equipment and other materials utilizable for the reproduction of a work which do not conform to the specifications determined pursuant to Article 59 of this Law; manufactures or imports or distributes, or possesses with intent to distribute, objects which can thwart the efficacy of the above-mentioned specifications, or engages in an act which can have that result; reproduces or uses a work without utilizing the equipment or without applying the systems specified pursuant to Article 60 of this Law; distributes, or possesses with intent to distribute, a phonogram or film without the special mark or control label specified pursuant to Article 61 of this Law.
Where a sentence of imprisonment is imposed with the option of redeemability, the sum payable for the redemption shall be 10 times the sum specified as per the case in the Penal Code.
Where mitigating circumstances exist, the fine imposed shall not be less than half of the minimum fine imposable as per the case under this Law.
Any person who proceeds to authorized temporary or permanent reproduction of the database, translation, adaptation, arrangement and any other alteration of the database, distribution to the public of the database or of copies thereof, communication, display or performance of the database to the public, is punished by imprisonment of at least one (1) year and a fine of one (1) to five (5) million drachmas.
Any person who proceeds to extraction and/or re-utilization of the whole or of a substantial part of the contents of the database without the authorization of the author thereof, is punished by imprisonment of at least one (1) year and a fine of one (1) to five (5) million drachmas (article 12 of Directive 96/9).
When the object of the infringement refers to computer software, the culpable character of the action, as described in paragraph 1 of article 65A and under the prerequisites provided there, is raised under the condition that the infringer proceeds in the unreserved payment of the administrative fee and the infringement concerns a quantity of up to 50 programs.
When the object of infringement concerns recordings of sound in which a work protected by copyright law has been recorded, the unreserved payment of an administrative fee according to the stipulation of par.2 of article 65A and under the prerequisites provided there, the culpable character of the action is raised under the condition that the infringement concerns a quantity of up to five hundred (500) illegal sound recording carriers.
The payment of the administrative fee and the raising of the culpable character of the action, do not relieve the infringers from the duty of buying off the copyright and related rights or from the duty of compensating and paying the rest expenses to the holders of these rights, according to the provisions of the relevant laws.
In case of recidivism during the same financial year the administrative fee provided for by article 65A doubles.

pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: cosine_accuracy@1, cosine_accuracy@3, cosine_accuracy@5, cosine_accuracy@10, cosine_precision@1, cosine_precision@3, cosine_precision@5, cosine_precision@10, cosine_recall@1, cosine_recall@3, cosine_recall@5, cosine_recall@10, cosine_ndcg@10, cosine_mrr@10, cosine_map@100
model-index: name: ModernBERT Embed base Legal Matryoshka
results: task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 768
type: dim_768
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.4292929292929293
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.4772727272727273
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.51010101010101
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.5580808080808081
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.4292929292929293
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.425925925925926
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.40505050505050505
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.3664141414141413
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.0751982284336321
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.20235093141021257
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.27463248011870894
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.3947544731611413
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.4897621531180367
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.459153038319705
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.5443794555841038
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 512
type: dim_512
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.4318181818181818
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.4722222222222222
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.5025252525252525
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.5505050505050505
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.4318181818181818
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.4276094276094277
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.40404040404040403
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.36641414141414147
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.0735938690990096
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.20025394822770307
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.27110868300938556
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.3951026142987562
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.48876044460187307
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.4593514510181176
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.5397662687267318
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 256
type: dim_256
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.44191919191919193
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.4823232323232323
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.5176767676767676
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.5580808080808081
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.44191919191919193
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.4335016835016835
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.4136363636363637
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.376010101010101
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.07690414128886712
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.2003819774471398
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.2717925391991229
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.39172641727822105
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.4978085916690042
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.46815075356742036
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.5494543459796255
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 128
type: dim_128
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.4393939393939394
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.47474747474747475
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.51010101010101
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.5580808080808081
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.4393939393939394
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.4292929292929293
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.4116161616161616
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.3803030303030303
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.07362039092117247
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.19095556525374321
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.26191618435759206
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.39061022820137703
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.49682676626276046
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.4651615359948693
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.5412663016799092
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no, task: type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset: name: dim 64
type: dim_64
metrics: type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.4090909090909091
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.45707070707070707
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.48484848484848486
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
verified: no, type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.5303030303030303
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.4090909090909091
name: Cosine Precision@1
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.4074074074074074
name: Cosine Precision@3
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.3919191919191919
name: Cosine Precision@5
verified: no, type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.3580808080808081
name: Cosine Precision@10
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.06634736687731509
name: Cosine Recall@1
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.17968522294173428
name: Cosine Recall@3
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.2507398221395632
name: Cosine Recall@5
verified: no, type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.3628065315255539
name: Cosine Recall@10
verified: no, type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.46665152087555123
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
verified: no, type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.43709415584415584
name: Cosine Mrr@10
verified: no, type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.5118679169251531
name: Cosine Map@100
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 219
Created: 2025-07-13 12:08:09