Model: research-dump/bge-base-en-v1.5_wikinews_outcome_prediction_v1
Author: research-dump
Pipeline: text-classification
Library: setfit
Tags: setfit, safetensors, bert, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer, arxiv:2209.11055, base_model:BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, base_model:finetune:BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
Card metadata: base_model: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
library_name: setfit
metrics: accuracy
pipeline_tag: text-classification
tags: setfit, sentence-transformers, text-classification, generated_from_setfit_trainer
widget: Andy Symanowski: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some behind the scenes of making the movies, but nothing extensive about this person [4] and [5] .  I don't see notability from the sources used in the article either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and United Kingdom .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 05:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page., List of communities served by Comcast: Rusf10 ( talk ) 04:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Business , Internet ,  and United States of America .  Rusf10 ( talk ) 04:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Many many many companies on Wikipedia list their service area(s).   Perhaps not to the level of the city/town licenses which is what actually grants Comcast its service area.  i.e. One canneot get XFINITY outside of city/town licensed to allow offer it.  But should a company's service area be listed on Wikipedia is the better question?   Many banks list the states they're in as they're licensed on the state level.  Verizon lists their FiOS area markets.  Charter Communications lists its markets.   The satellite providers which are all in the same sky list their service areas.   Radio/TV stations list the area/markets they're licensed to serve.  Mobile companies list the states they are licensed to operate in.  There's LOTS of DIR on Wikipedia.   For example: List of countries with Burger King franchises .   To that logic wouldn't people just goto BK.com and look up what Burger Kings are nearby?  CaribDigita ( talk ) 07:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB .   No analysis or summary is offered; the article is just a long bulleted list.   Anyone searching for this information would just get it from Comcast, who would have a more up-to-date list anyway.   Consensus has been that standalone lists of airline destinations are not encyclopedic enough for WP, and I think this article is very similar in concept to that.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTDIR and minimal coverage of the topic ( this is about as good as secondary coverage gets).  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 01:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTDB .  Unencyclopedic content.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page., Mel Davis (musician) : Boleyn ( talk ) 08:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Florida ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page., The People's Republic of Amnesia: There appears to be only 1 decent review from NY times.  But doesn't meet WP:NBOOK .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and China .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep BEFORE fail.  WaPo mentions it, this year, demonstrating it has enduring coverage.  Anything the Chinese Communist Party wants to ban... we'd better have a really airtight case for deleting, and this ain't it.  Jclemens ( talk ) 00:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Anything the Chinese Communist Party wants to ban." is not a criteria for WP:NBOOK .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, it's a criteria for a project built on NOTCENSORED, which I happen to believe applies to this case based on the WaPo article I cited.  Consider beefing up your BEFORE, withdrawing the nomination, or accept the residual risk of appearing to have nomination priorities congruent with a totalitarian regime.  That may be totally OK with you, but I would consider having myself apparently so aligned a pretty negative thing.  Cheers, Jclemens ( talk ) 00:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Suggest you tone down your aggressive tone.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clearly meets WP:NBOOK .  Numerous reviews, including in Krikus Reviews , Publishers Weekly , The Guardian , Wall Street Journal .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  00:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've also added a link to the Times review already in the article, which is accessible through TWL.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  00:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks LibStar ( talk ) 00:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : several reviews in serious RS.  Have done some tidying up - removed the umpteen repeated links to the author, removed a duplicated ref, and fixed the curly quotes.  Pam D 09:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as the Reception section shows notability.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 12:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep notable, while the article might not have shown notability, remember to check WP:BEFORE nominating for deletion.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 20:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per coverage in reviews.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 22:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page., Sonia Jackson Myles: WP:NOT and TOU violations.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CptViraj ( talk ) 12:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CptViraj ( talk ) 12:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete professional profile , WP:NOTLINKEDIN — siro χ o 15:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PR pieces, this Forbes Contributor piece [22] and the Blomberg interview used in the article, none of which are RS, show this isn't notable.  I can't find non-PR sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.
inference: yes
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 11
Created: 2024-11-29 22:20:24