Model: gmedrano/snowflake-arctic-embed-m-finetuned
Author: gmedrano
Pipeline: sentence-similarity
Library: sentence-transformers
Tags: sentence-transformers, safetensors, bert, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:40, loss:CosineSimilarityLoss, arxiv:1908.10084, base_model:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m, base_model:finetune:Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m, model-index, text-embeddings-inference, endpoints_compatible, region:us
Base models (finetune): id: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
Card metadata: base_model: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics: pearson_cosine, spearman_cosine, pearson_manhattan, spearman_manhattan, pearson_euclidean, spearman_euclidean, pearson_dot, spearman_dot, pearson_max, spearman_max
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
tags: sentence-transformers, sentence-similarity, feature-extraction, generated_from_trainer, dataset_size:40, loss:CosineSimilarityLoss
widget: source_sentence: What role does NIST play in establishing AI standards?
sentences: provides examples and concrete steps for communities, industry, governments, and others to take in order to 
build these protections into policy, practice, or the technological design process. 
Taken together, the technical protections and practices laid out in the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights can help 
guard the American public against many of the potential and actual harms identified by researchers, technolo­, provides examples and concrete steps for communities, industry, governments, and others to take in order to 
build these protections into policy, practice, or the technological design process. 
Taken together, the technical protections and practices laid out in the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights can help 
guard the American public against many of the potential and actual harms identified by researchers, technolo­, Acknowledgments: This report was accomplished with the many helpful comments and contributions 
from the community, including the NIST Generative AI Public Working Group, and NIST staﬀ and guest 
researchers: Chloe Autio, Jesse Dunietz, Patrick Hall, Shomik Jain, Kamie Roberts, Reva Schwartz, Martin 
Stanley, and Elham Tabassi. 
NIST Technical Series Policies 
Copyright, Use, and Licensing Statements 
NIST Technical Series Publication Identifier Syntax 
Publication History, source_sentence: What are the implications of AI in decision-making processes?
sentences: The measures taken to realize the vision set forward in this framework should be proportionate 
with the extent and nature of the harm, or risk of harm, to people's rights, opportunities, and 
access. 
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING LAW AND POLICY
The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights is an exercise in envisioning a future where the American public is 
protected from the potential harms, and can fully enjoy the benefits, of automated systems. It describes princi­, state of the science of AI measurement and safety today. This document focuses on risks for which there 
is an existing empirical evidence base at the time this proﬁle was written; for example, speculative risks 
that may potentially arise in more advanced, future GAI systems are not considered. Future updates may 
incorporate additional risks or provide further details on the risks identiﬁed below., development of automated systems that adhere to and advance their safety, security and 
effectiveness. Multiple NSF programs support research that directly addresses many of these principles: 
the National AI Research Institutes23 support research on all aspects of safe, trustworthy, fair, and explainable 
AI algorithms and systems; the Cyber Physical Systems24 program supports research on developing safe, source_sentence: How are AI systems validated for safety and fairness according to NIST standards?
sentences: tion and advises on implementation of the DOE AI Strategy and addresses issues and/or escalations on the 
ethical use and development of AI systems.20 The Department of Defense has adopted Artificial Intelligence 
Ethical Principles, and tenets for Responsible Artificial Intelligence specifically tailored to its national 
security and defense activities.21 Similarly, the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) has developed the Principles, GOVERN 1.1: Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented.  
Action ID 
Suggested Action 
GAI Risks 
GV-1.1-001 Align GAI development and use with applicable laws and regulations, including 
those related to data privacy, copyright and intellectual property law. 
Data Privacy; Harmful Bias and 
Homogenization; Intellectual 
Property 
AI Actor Tasks: Governance and Oversight, more than a decade, is also helping to fulﬁll the 2023 Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy 
AI. NIST established the U.S. AI Safety Institute and the companion AI Safety Institute Consortium to 
continue the eﬀorts set in motion by the E.O. to build the science necessary for safe, secure, and 
trustworthy development and use of AI. 
Acknowledgments: This report was accomplished with the many helpful comments and contributions, source_sentence: How does the AI Bill of Rights protect individual privacy?
sentences: match the statistical properties of real-world data without disclosing personally 
identiﬁable information or contributing to homogenization. 
Data Privacy; Intellectual Property; 
Information Integrity; 
Confabulation; Harmful Bias and 
Homogenization 
AI Actor Tasks: AI Deployment, AI Impact Assessment, Governance and Oversight, Operation and Monitoring 
 
MANAGE 2.3: Procedures are followed to respond to and recover from a previously unknown risk when it is identiﬁed. 
Action ID, the principles described in the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights may be necessary to comply with existing law, 
conform to the practicalities of a specific use case, or balance competing public interests. In particular, law 
enforcement, and other regulatory contexts may require government actors to protect civil rights, civil liberties, 
and privacy in a manner consistent with, but using alternate mechanisms to, the specific principles discussed in, civil rights, civil liberties, and privacy. The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights includes this Foreword, the five 
principles, notes on Applying the The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, and a Technical Companion that gives 
concrete steps that can be taken by many kinds of organizations—from governments at all levels to companies of 
all sizes—to uphold these values. Experts from across the private sector, governments, and international, source_sentence: How does the AI Bill of Rights protect individual privacy?
sentences: 57 
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023) AI Risk Management Framework, Appendix B: 
How AI Risks Diﬀer from Traditional Software Risks. 
https://airc.nist.gov/AI_RMF_Knowledge_Base/AI_RMF/Appendices/Appendix_B 
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023) AI RMF Playbook. 
https://airc.nist.gov/AI_RMF_Knowledge_Base/Playbook 
National Institue of Standards and Technology (2023) Framing Risk, principles for managing information about individuals have been incorporated into data privacy laws and 
policies across the globe.5 The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights embraces elements of the FIPPs that are 
particularly relevant to automated systems, without articulating a specific set of FIPPs or scoping 
applicability or the interests served to a single particular domain, like privacy, civil rights and civil liberties,, harmful 
uses. 
The 
NIST 
framework 
will 
consider 
and 
encompass 
principles 
such 
as 
transparency, accountability, and fairness during pre-design, design and development, deployment, use, 
and testing and evaluation of AI technologies and systems. It is expected to be released in the winter of 2022-23. 
21
model-index: name: SentenceTransformer based on Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
results: task: type: semantic-similarity
name: Semantic Similarity
dataset: name: val
type: val
metrics: type: pearson_cosine
value: 0.6585006489314952
name: Pearson Cosine
verified: no, type: spearman_cosine
value: 0.7
name: Spearman Cosine
verified: no, type: pearson_manhattan
value: 0.582665729755017
name: Pearson Manhattan
verified: no, type: spearman_manhattan
value: 0.6
name: Spearman Manhattan
verified: no, type: pearson_euclidean
value: 0.6722783219807118
name: Pearson Euclidean
verified: no, type: spearman_euclidean
value: 0.7
name: Spearman Euclidean
verified: no, type: pearson_dot
value: 0.6585002582595083
name: Pearson Dot
verified: no, type: spearman_dot
value: 0.7
name: Spearman Dot
verified: no, type: pearson_max
value: 0.6722783219807118
name: Pearson Max
verified: no, type: spearman_max
value: 0.7
name: Spearman Max
verified: no, task: type: semantic-similarity
name: Semantic Similarity
dataset: name: test
type: test
metrics: type: pearson_cosine
value: 0.7463407966146629
name: Pearson Cosine
verified: no, type: spearman_cosine
value: 0.7999999999999999
name: Spearman Cosine
verified: no, type: pearson_manhattan
value: 0.7475379067038609
name: Pearson Manhattan
verified: no, type: spearman_manhattan
value: 0.7999999999999999
name: Spearman Manhattan
verified: no, type: pearson_euclidean
value: 0.7592380598802199
name: Pearson Euclidean
verified: no, type: spearman_euclidean
value: 0.7999999999999999
name: Spearman Euclidean
verified: no, type: pearson_dot
value: 0.7463412670178408
name: Pearson Dot
verified: no, type: spearman_dot
value: 0.7999999999999999
name: Spearman Dot
verified: no, type: pearson_max
value: 0.7592380598802199
name: Pearson Max
verified: no, type: spearman_max
value: 0.7999999999999999
name: Spearman Max
verified: no
Likes: 0 | All-time downloads: 8
Created: 2024-09-24 23:26:37