Hibbaan/DIVYADRISHTI huggingface dataset:
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED & ORS.versusRENEW WIND ENERGY (RAJKOT) PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3480/2020
Decision Date: 13-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC366

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL*, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, M.M. SUNDRESH Electricity Act, 2003 – Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Recognition and issuance of Renewable Energy Certificate for Renewable Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) in terms of the REC Regulations 2010 was entered into between the parties, on 29.03.2012, within the control period stipulated in the tariff order of 2010 – On 10.07.2013, Central Commission amended the REC Regulations 2010 (‘Second
BHASIN INFOTECH AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.
Case No.: TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No. 82/2022
Decision Date: 17-03-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC260

DINESH MAHESHWARI*, J.K. MAHESHWARI Lease: Conversion of land from leasehold to freehold in view of policy formulated by the State – Entitlement to – On facts, allotment of commercial plots to the petitioner company by the State Industrial Development Corporation-UPSIDC, land allotted on 90 years Building plan for construction over allotted land sanctioned – Construction completed and issuance of partial completion certificate – Thereafter, policy formulated by the respondent no. 1 for growth of tourism by setting up theme/ amusements parks – Policy laid down conditions
THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.versusMULTIPLEX ASSN. OF GUJARAT THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 13977/2015
Decision Date: 02-02-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC717

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Tax/Taxation – Scheme to boost tourism sector, granted tax holiday for 5-10 years to entities (including multi-cinema theatre complexes or multiplexes) in respect of exemption from sales tax, turnover tax, tax, and entertainment tax upto 100% capital investment – No discerning method or mechanism of calculating exemption limits mentioned in scheme – Assessee contended that it was based on notional exercise, revenue contended that element of tax had to be added to actual amount collected
VEENA VADINI TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE (RUN BY VEENA VADINI SAMAJ KALYAN VIKASH SAMITI)versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3177/2023
Decision Date: 28-04-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC457

DINESH MAHESHWARI*, SUDHANSHU DHULIA Constitution of India – Art. 14, 15 and 19(1)(g) – Reservation – Appellant-Institute trained teachers for B.Ed. and M.Ed. courses – Appellant challenged a “Admission Process and Guiding Principles 2022-2023”) before the High Court – Appellant’s challenge was mainly based on clause 1.5(a) of the policy, which allocates the B.Ed seats in the institute – As per which 75% of seats this Course reserved for “residents
M/S NORTH EASTERN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. & ANRversusM/S ASHOK PAPER MILL (ASSAM) LTD. & ANR.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2669/2013
Decision Date: 11-12-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1059

ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KAROL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether Article 116 of the Limitation Act 1963, applies to proceedings under the Jogighopa (Assam) Unit of Ashok Paper Mills Limited (Acquisition Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1990 and; if the apply then, in the absence of Limitation being placed within the text of the Statute in question, could the Appeal fi led against the Order of the Commissioner of Payments be held as maintainable having been fi led after a period of nearly three years from the said order. Jogighopa (Assam) Unit
THE STATE OF TRIPURA & ANRversusCHANDAN DEB & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6500/2008
Decision Date: 24-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC284

M.R. SHAH*, KRISHNA MURARI Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 : ss. 3A, 3AA – Tripura Sales Tax Rules, 1976 – r. 3A(2) – Sub-rule (2) of the r. 3A, if ultra vires to the provisions of the TST Act – On facts, issuance of work order for hiring vehicles by ONGC, GAIL, FCI in favour suppliers of the vehicle – Writ petitioners challenging vires of r. 3A(2) and for refund of the amount so deducted as sales tax on transfer of the right to use goods – Single Judge held r.3A(2) as ultra vires the TST Act which was upheld by the Division Bench – Single Bench
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusADITYA TRIPATHI
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1401/2023
Decision Date: 12-05-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC531

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: s. 45 – Enlargement on bail – Sustainability of – Allegations of tempering of bids – Accused chargesheeted u/ss. 120-B, 420, 468, 471 IPC and s. 7 rw s. 13(2) of the PC Act, the scheduled offences – Offences 2002 added later – Enforcement Directorate initiated money laundering investigation – Respondent no. 1 arrested – Thereafter, the High Court enlarged the respondent No.1 on bail – Sustainability of – Held: Not sustainable – High Court did not consider the
NARAYAN CHETANRAM CHAUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 157334/2018
Decision Date: 27-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC298

K.M. JOSEPH*, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, HRISHIKESH ROY Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – ss. 9, 94 – Juvenility – Determination of – The applicant, along with two other accomplices had committed and two children – They were tried for commission of offences u/ss. 302, 342, 397, 449 r/w 120B and 34 of IPC – Trial Court sentenced the appellant to death – Both the judgment of conviction and order of sentence were confirmed by the High Court – The Supreme Court
STATE OF ORISSA & ANR.versusLAXMI NARAYAN DAS (DEAD) THR. LRS & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 8072/2010
Decision Date: 12-07-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC619

ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Orissa Survey and Settlement Act, 1958 : ss. 12, 15(b) – Final publication of record of rights – Revision of record of rights – Respondent claimed to have right over certain land – Record of rights finalised in the year 1962 – Appeal by the respondents before the Though appeal was not maintainable, however, the Settlement officer decided the same and directed the respondent to raise their claim before the General Administrative Department-GAD – Till then, said land already allotted to Reserve Bank of India-RBI by the GAD – Respondents alleged
BHARTIBEN CHANDRAKANTBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 24/2013
Decision Date: 27-02-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC171

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA Service law: Resignation – Pensionary dues – Appellant, Auxiliary Nurse Midwife submitted her resignation, however, withdrew it prior to its acceptance – Subsequently, she her service but was not allowed to join – Much thereafter an order was passed accepting her resignation – High Court set aside the said order and directed that the appellant was entitled to all consequential benefits – However, the Division Bench modified the order of Single
SAJEEVversusSTATE OF KERALA
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1134/2011
Decision Date: 09-11-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC998

ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KAROL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the conviction and sentence of the accused-A10 and A11 u/ss. 302, 307, and 326/120B IPC and s.55(a), (h), (i) and s. 57 (A)(1)(ii) of the Abkari Act by the courts below is sustainable in law. Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 302, 307 and 326/120B – – Conspiracy of alcohol poisoning – A1, kingpin of the illicit liquor business alongwith A3, A10, and A11 hatched a conspiracy to mix methyl alcohol with spirit to sell the same for an unlawful gain through the outlet operated by A1, and the consumption of the same resulted in the
CAPTAIN PRAMOD KUMAR BAJAJversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6161/2022
Decision Date: 03-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC204

A.S. BOPANNA*, HIMA KOHLI Service Law: Compulsory retirement – Quashing of, when – Appellant selected and empanelled for appointment as a Member of ITAT by the Selection Committee – However, his appointment did not mature – Respondent withheld his appointment on various counts, however, tribunal courts directed the respondents forward the name of the appellant to the appropriate Authority for selection/appointment to the post of Member, ITAT – Respondents did not comply with the orders and in the meantime initiated disciplinary proceedings against the appellant which never reached
R. SREENIVASAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 859/2011
Decision Date: 06-09-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC803

VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court if justifi ed in reversing the acquittal order passed by the Trial Court qua the appellant-accused acquitting him of off ences u/ss.302 and 201, IPC by which it held that the prosecution had failed to prove that the deceased was last seen in the Evidence – Circumstantial evidence – Last seen theory – When cannot be invoked: Held: The ‘last seen’ theory can be invoked only when the same stands proved beyond reasonable doubt – In the present case, there is no defi nitive evidence of last seen and
SMT. DARIYAO KANWAR & ORS.versusM/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 5416/2012
Decision Date: 23-08-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC756

HIMA KOHLI*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: While driving vehicle, health of the driver deteriorated, he parked his vehicle and died. Whether such untoward mishap can reasonably be described as an accident, attributable to the nature of employment. Employee’s Appellants-claimants fi led application before the Commissioner seeking compensation under the 1923 Act – Compensation of ` 3,26,140/- was granted – However, the view of the High Court was that there is no relationship between the death and the work being done by the deceased
MAGIC EYE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.versusM/S. GREEN EDGE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. ETC.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3634/2023
Decision Date: 12-05-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC528

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act, 2015 – s.11(6) – Pre-referral jurisdiction – Before the High Court, appellant raised objection with regard to the existence of an arbitration agreement – High Court/referral court arbitrability of the dispute can be addressed by Arbitral Tribunal – Thereafter, High Court referred the disputes for arbitration and appointed a arbitrator – On appeal, held: Pre-referral jurisdiction of the court u/s. 11(6) of the Arbitration Act is very narrow and inheres two
PRADEEP MEHRAversusHARIJIVAN J. JETHWA (SINCE DECEASED THR. LRS.) & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6375/2023
Decision Date: 30-10-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC958

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL*, SUDHANSHU DHULIA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to the delay being caused to the execution proceedings u/ord. XXI CPC, and the process being abused in the execution proceedings, to the peril of the decree holder. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – s. 47 by the court executing decree – Scope and ambit of: Held: All questions between the parties can be decided by the executing court – These questions are limited to the execution of the decree – Executing court can never go behind the decree – Under s. 47 the
SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1011/2022
Decision Date: 17-10-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC920

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL*, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: The issues were primarily two-fold: (a) the status of the right to marry for LGBTQ+ couples and (b) depending upon the answer to the fi rst, the The petitioners (members of LGBTQ community)asserted that marriage is an evolving social institution, capable of embracing the union of two willing non-heterosexual, queer or LGBTQ+ (used interchangeably) individuals and necessitating state recognition. On the other, the respondents asserted
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE AND ANR.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 9720/2014
Decision Date: 25-09-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC855

B.V. NAGARATHNA*, UJJAL BHUYAN HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was right in affi rming the fi ndings of the Single Judge, to the eff ect that the Settlement Commission ought not to have exercised discretion u/s. 245H of the Income Tax Act, immunity to the assessee de hors any material to demonstrate that there was no wilful concealment on the part of the assessee to evade tax and on that ground, remanding the matter to the Commission for fresh consideration. Income Tax Act, 1961 – s. 245H – Power of Settlement
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VversusSHYAMO & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 365/2023
Decision Date: 20-01-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC70

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) – High Court relying on its decision in Gyanender Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 1393/2014], allowed the writ petition filed by the original that the acquisition w.r.t the land in question is deemed to have lapsed u/s.24(2) on the ground that the compensation was not tendered to the original writ petitioner– On appeal, held: While deciding the Gyanender Singh case, the High Court had relied upon the earlier decision of Supreme
SUNIL SAINI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
Case No.: TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 125/2019
Decision Date: 30-01-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC715

English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabiతెలుగు - Telugu 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 SUNIL SAINI & ORS. versus THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. - [2023] 1 S.C.R. 11052023 INSC 715 K.M. JOSEPH, B.V. NAGARATHNA 1 S.C.R. 1105 SUNIL SAINI & ORS. v. THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. (Transfer Petition (Criminal) No.125 of 2019) JANUARY 30, 2023 [K. M. JOSEPH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA] Transfer Petition: Transfer of the case sought from the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar to the Competent Court in to the petitioners by setting their houses, godowns and their every belonging on fire – Complete breakdown of the law and order resulting in gross damage – Prosecuting team not acting in a fair and fearless manner – Petitioners who are witnesses have been under threats by the
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusJAGAN SINGH & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 943/2023
Decision Date: 17-02-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC139

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KAROL 2 S.C.R. 411 411 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JAGAN SINGH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.943 of 2023) FEBRUARY 17, 2023 [M. R. SHAH, C.T. RAVIKUMAR & SANJAY KAROL JJ.] Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) initiated w.r.t the land in question is deemed to have lapsed u/s.24(2) – On appeal, held: Decision in Pune Municipal Corporation case has been overruled by the Constitution Bench in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. reported as wherein it is held that once the
BANK OF BARODA & ORSversusBALJIT SINGH
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 624/2017
Decision Date: 21-06-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC584

English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 BANK OF BARODA & ORS versus BALJIT SINGH - [2023] 10 S.C.R. 9772023 INSC 584 B.V. NAGARATHNA, MANOJ MISRA Service Law – Compassionate Appointment – Criterion regarding financial status, non-fulfilment of – Held: Appointment of a candidate on compassionate basis does not create any vested right – It is only when a candidate is covered under all clauses of the Scheme applicable In the present case, the 1998 Scheme applicable to the case of the respondent disentitles a candidate for compassionate appointment benefit on the application of the formula for calculation of monthly income if the same is not less than 60% of the total emoluments which the deceased was drawing
B. S. HARI COMMANDANTversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1890/2014
Decision Date: 13-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC369

English हिन्दी - Hindiमराठी - Marathiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabiతెలుగు - Telugu 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 B. S. HARI COMMANDANT versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - [2023] 3 S.C.R. 4312023 INSC 369 KRISHNA MURARI, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH Border Security Force Act, 1968 – Appellant-Commandant in Border Security Force was sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment; imposed fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and dismissed from service for allegedly permitting smuggling of contraband goods from India to Pakistan from his control – Held: Though in the armed forces, including the paramilitary forces, utmost discipline, unity of command are the sine qua non, the doctrine of proportionality still holds the field – In the present case, there is no direct evidence against the appellant – Except
SHATRUGHANversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 437/2016
Decision Date: 20-07-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC630

VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 – Culpable homicide amounting to murder – Conviction u/s. 302 – Correctness of – FIR against the appellant by the informant-uncle of deceased – Allegation that the deceased had shouted that the appellant had assaulted him with a tabbal – place of incident and saw his nephew lying there with deep cut on the neck – Nephew later succumbed to his injuries – Conviction of the appellant u/s. 302 and sentenced to life imprisonment by the courts below – On appeal, held: Prosecution failed to establish the charge –
DIVYAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 724/2023
Decision Date: 09-10-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC900

J.K. MAHESHWARI*, K.V. VISWANATHAN HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: What is the eligibility criterion for a candidate to stake a valid claim under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Category as per the Civil Services Examination Rules, 2022 r/w OM dtd.19.01.2019 and 31.01.2019; was the UPSC justifi ed in prescribing possession and for uploading of the I&AC certifi cates in the prescribed format to stake a valid claim under the EWS category; are the CSE-Rules 2022 enforceable in law; are rr. 13, 27(3) and 28 of the CSE-Rules 2022 constitutionally valid; was the UPSC justifi ed in rejecting the claim of