Hibbaan/DIVYADRISHTI huggingface dataset:
DUNI CHANDversusVIKRAM SINGH AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 8187/2023
Decision Date: 10-07-2024
Disposal: Case Allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC516

VIKRAM NATH*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in extending the benefit of Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, to the defendants despite the lack of specific pleadings, and no evidence to show consent of interested persons. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Consent of persons interested in the immovable property required – No specific pleading or evidence showing the consent, whether express or implied, of the interested persons – Relief granted in favour of defendants by the High Court relying on Section 41 was unwarranted. 

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.DUNI CHANDversusVIKRAM SINGH AND OTHERS-[2024] 7 S.C.R. 12022024 INSC 516Coram : VIKRAM NATH*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRAIssue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in extending the benefit of Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, to the defendants despite the lack of specific pleadings, and no evidence to show consent of interested persons. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Consent of persons interested in the immovable property required – No specific pleading or evidence showing the consent, whether express or implied, of the interested persons – Relief granted in favour of defendants by the High Court relying on Section 41 was unwarranted.
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusVIJAYKUMAR V. IYER AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3088/2020
Decision Date: 03-01-2024
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC15

SANJIV KHANNA*, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI Issue for Consideration The present appeals raise a question on the right to claim set-off in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, when the Resolution Professional proceeds in terms of clause (a) to sub-section (2) of s.25 of the Insolvency and take custody and control of all the assets of the corporate debtor. Headnotes Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – clause (a) to sub- section (2) of s.25, s.238, s.243 – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 – Regn. 29 – The 

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusVIJAYKUMAR V. IYER AND OTHERS-[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1402024 INSC 15Coram : SANJIV KHANNA*, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTIIssue for Consideration The present appeals raise a question on the right to claim set-off in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, when the Resolution Professional proceeds in terms of clause (a) to sub-section (2) of s.25 of the Insolvency and take custody and control of all the assets of the corporate debtor. Headnotes Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – clause (a) to sub- section (2) of s.25, s.238, s.243 – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 – Regn. 29 – The
RAKESH RANJAN SHRIVASTAVAversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 741/2024
Decision Date: 15-03-2024
Disposal: Case Partly allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC205

ABHAY S. OKA*, UJJAL BHUYAN Issue for Consideration Whether the provision of sub-section (1) of s.143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for the grant of interim compensation, is directory or mandatory. If it is held to be a directory provision, what are factors to be considered while exercising (1) of Section 143A of the N.I. Act. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – s.143A(1) – Grant of interim compensation – Directory or mandatory: Held: Power under sub-section (1) of s.143A is discretionary and not mandatory – Sub-section (1) of s.143A provides for 

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.RAKESH RANJAN SHRIVASTAVAversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.-[2024] 3 S.C.R. 4382024 INSC 205Coram : ABHAY S. OKA*, UJJAL BHUYANIssue for Consideration Whether the provision of sub-section (1) of s.143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for the grant of interim compensation, is directory or mandatory. If it is held to be a directory provision, what are factors to be considered while exercising (1) of Section 143A of the N.I. Act. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – s.143A(1) – Grant of interim compensation – Directory or mandatory: Held: Power under sub-section (1) of s.143A is discretionary and not mandatory – Sub-section (1) of s.143A provides for
PERIYASAMYversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 270/2019
Decision Date: 18-03-2024
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC212

HRISHIKESH ROY*, SANJAY KAROL Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court justified in affirming the judgment of trial court convicting and sentencing the accused appellant, (A-1), for the offence punishable under sections 302 & 307 of Penal Code, 1860 and accused appellant (A-2) for the offence punishable & 307/109 of Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 – s. 302 and s.307 – Trial Court convicted and sentenced appellants – Relying on ocular and medical evidence – High Court confirmed the sentence and conviction – Whether the sentence and conviction falls 

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.PERIYASAMYversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE-[2024] 3 S.C.R. 7472024 INSC 212Coram : HRISHIKESH ROY*, SANJAY KAROLIssue for Consideration Whether the High Court justified in affirming the judgment of trial court convicting and sentencing the accused appellant, (A-1), for the offence punishable under sections 302 & 307 of Penal Code, 1860 and accused appellant (A-2) for the offence punishable & 307/109 of Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 – s. 302 and s.307 – Trial Court convicted and sentenced appellants – Relying on ocular and medical evidence – High Court confirmed the sentence and conviction – Whether the sentence and conviction falls
SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 11030/2024
Decision Date: 04-10-2024
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC763

BELA M. TRIVEDI*, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA Issue for Consideration Despite the preparation of the Final Select List which signals the conclusion of the appointment process, the State Government sought to scrap the entire process and undertake a fresh appointment process under the New Rules. Whether this amounted to of the game after the game was played which is impermissible and deprives the candidates of their legitimate right of consideration under the previous Rules. Headnotes† Bihar Water Resources Department Subordinate Engineering (Civil) Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2015 – Bihar Water Flip viewPDF

Summary: SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS-[2024] 10 S.C.R. 13442024 INSC 763Coram : BELA M. TRIVEDI*, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMAIssue for Consideration Despite the preparation of the Final Select List which signals the conclusion of the appointment process, the State Government sought to scrap the entire process and undertake a fresh appointment process under the New Rules. Whether this amounted to of the game after the game was played which is impermissible and deprives the candidates of their legitimate right of consideration under the previous Rules. Headnotes† Bihar Water Resources Department Subordinate Engineering (Civil) Cadre Recruitment Rules, 2015 – Bihar WaterFlip viewPDF
TARINA SENversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4114/2024
Decision Date: 03-10-2024
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC752

BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, K.V. VISWANATHAN Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the appellants would be justified, when the matter has been compromised between the borrower and Bank. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Exercise of power u/ss.120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d) of the 1988 Act – Application u/s.482 CrPC for quashing of the criminal proceedings pending before the Special Judge – Disposed of, by the High Court by permitting the appellants to urge all the pleas raised in the 

Summary: Englishଓଡ଼ିଆ - Odiaਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.TARINA SENversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.-[2024] 10 S.C.R. 4172024 INSC 752Coram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, K.V. VISWANATHANIssue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the appellants would be justified, when the matter has been compromised between the borrower and Bank. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Exercise of power u/ss.120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d) of the 1988 Act – Application u/s.482 CrPC for quashing of the criminal proceedings pending before the Special Judge – Disposed of, by the High Court by permitting the appellants to urge all the pleas raised in the
PRADHAN BABU AND OTHERSversusNACHIMUTHU NAGAR KUDIYIRUPPOR NALA SANGAM AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 5875/2023
Decision Date: 28-08-2024
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC1047

VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH Issue for Consideration Whether the suit land was under any sort of legal encumbrance so as to make it unfit for transfer of right, title and interest thereon in light of the Layout Plan notified by the Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning, Thanjavur region in the revised in the year 1981. Headnotes† Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1972 – ss.37 and 38 – For a creation of a Nagar various plots were formed by one N – In a Layout plan, a portion of land was earmarked for public purpose for welfare of the residents – Flip viewPDF

Summary: PRADHAN BABU AND OTHERSversusNACHIMUTHU NAGAR KUDIYIRUPPOR NALA SANGAM AND OTHERS-[2024] 8 S.C.R. 16732024 INSC 1047Coram : VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAHIssue for Consideration Whether the suit land was under any sort of legal encumbrance so as to make it unfit for transfer of right, title and interest thereon in light of the Layout Plan notified by the Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning, Thanjavur region in the revised in the year 1981. Headnotes† Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1972 – ss.37 and 38 – For a creation of a Nagar various plots were formed by one N – In a Layout plan, a portion of land was earmarked for public purpose for welfare of the residents –Flip viewPDF
VIKAS CHANDRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1101/2024
Decision Date: 22-02-2024
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC261

C.T. RAVIKUMAR*, RAJESH BINDAL Issue for Consideration Respondent No.2 was summoned to face the trial for the offence under Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860. High Court whether justified in quashing the summons. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 – ss.306, 107 – Abetment of suicide – When not – Code of ss.482, 204 – Case of the appellant was that his father committed suicide by consuming poison in the office of Sub-Mandi, Alhaganj where he was working, leaving a suicide note attributing responsibility for the same on respondent No.2 – Deceased was earlier working in Mandi Samiti, 

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.VIKAS CHANDRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.-[2024] 2 S.C.R. 12232024 INSC 261Coram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR*, RAJESH BINDALIssue for Consideration Respondent No.2 was summoned to face the trial for the offence under Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860. High Court whether justified in quashing the summons. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 – ss.306, 107 – Abetment of suicide – When not – Code of ss.482, 204 – Case of the appellant was that his father committed suicide by consuming poison in the office of Sub-Mandi, Alhaganj where he was working, leaving a suicide note attributing responsibility for the same on respondent No.2 – Deceased was earlier working in Mandi Samiti,