IN RE: REMARKS BY HIGH COURT JUDGE DURING COURT PROCEEDINGSversus
Case No.: SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 9/2024
Decision Date: 25-09-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC758

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, SANJIV KHANNA, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, SURYA KANT, HRISHIKESH ROY Issue for Consideration Certain misogynistic remarks as well as comments prejudicial to a particular community were made by a Judge of the High Court of Karnataka in the course of the judicial proceedings. Suo motu case taken up Court. Headnotes† Judicial Discipline – Misogynistic comments to a woman lawyer and casual observations against a particular community at large made by the Judge during judicial proceedings – Suo motu proceedings taken up by the Supreme Court however, notice was not issued to Decision Date : 25-09-2024 | Case No : SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 9/2024  | Direction Issue :  Proceedings concluded.  |  Bench : 5 Judges

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.IN RE: REMARKS BY HIGH COURT JUDGE DURING COURT PROCEEDINGSversus-[2024] 9 S.C.R. 6682024 INSC 758Coram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, SANJIV KHANNA, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, SURYA KANT, HRISHIKESH ROYIssue for Consideration Certain misogynistic remarks as well as comments prejudicial to a particular community were made by a Judge of the High Court of Karnataka in the course of the judicial proceedings. Suo motu case taken up Court. Headnotes† Judicial Discipline – Misogynistic comments to a woman lawyer and casual observations against a particular community at large made by the Judge during judicial proceedings – Suo motu proceedings taken up by the Supreme Court however, notice was not issued toDecision Date :25-09-2024| Case No :SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 9/2024| Direction Issue :Proceedings concluded.|  Bench :5 Judges