Hibbaan/DIVYADRISHTI huggingface dataset:
BUDDHADEB SAHA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1692/2022
Decision Date: 13-09-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1084

English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 BUDDHADEB SAHA & ORS. versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL - [2023] 15 S.C.R. 3322023 INSC 1084 J.B. PARDIWALA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment holding the husband and in-laws guilty for the off ence punishable u/ss. 498A, 304B read with 34 IPC. Evidence – Circumstantial evidence – Dowry demand – Commission of suicide by victim-wife on account of consumption of poison – However, post mortem report silent as to the exact cause of death and the viscera report silent as to traces of poison being found therein – Eff ect of, on prosecution case: Held: Considering the
DR. V. R. SANAL KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6301/2013
Decision Date: 12-05-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC526

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Service Law: Department of Space Employees (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1976 – r. 16(iii) – Special procedure in certain cases – Dismissal from service without holding any inquiry in the interest of the security of the State, invoking – Interference with – Appellant, high profile scientist in Indian Space Research Organisation-ISRO – Disciplinary proceedings against the appellant, alleging unauthorized absence from the country for taking post-doctoral research without permission and publication of a
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusRAJESH DUA & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 363/2023
Decision Date: 20-01-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC68

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) – High Court relied upon its decision in Smt. Harbans Kaur v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors., in which it had relied on the Supreme Court decision in case of Pune & Ors. – It held that depositing of the amount of compensation with the Reference Court cannot be regarded as compensation having been paid to the landowners and declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed as actual physical possession of
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA PADVIDHAR PRATHAMIK SHIKSHAK VA KENDRA PRAMUKH SABHAversusPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1765/2023
Decision Date: 17-03-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC258

SURYA KANT*, J.K. MAHESHWARI Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 – s.493 r/w Cl. 5 of Appendix (IV) – Services rendered by primary teachers (Respondent nos.5 to 79) while in the service of the Zilla Parishad (ZP), if to be counted towards their seniority after the services into the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) – On appeal by the primary teachers recruited directly by the PMC whose seniority is adversely affected, held: Service rendered by Respondent Nos. 5 to 79 in the ZP has to be treated as service rendered in the PMC and therefore has to be
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHIversusSUNIL JAIN & ORS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 280/2023
Decision Date: 13-01-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC39

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: s. 24(2)– Land acquisition, when deemed to have lapsed– Writ petition by the respondent-original writ petitioners, being subsequent purchasers seeking declaration that deemed to have lapsed in view of s.24(2) – High Court in view of the fact that the possession has not been taken over and the compensation is not paid and relying upon the decision of this Court in Pune Municipal Corporation’s case allowed the writ petition– Sustainability of
MANUBHAI SENDHABHAI BHARWAD & ANR.versusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 472/2023
Decision Date: 20-01-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC61

M.R. SHAH*, M.M. SUNDRESH Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Constitution of India – Art. 300A – The subject land was under temporary acquisition by ONGC since 1996 – Appellant (owner) sale deed dated 15.03.2005 – Appellants were paid Rs 24/sq. metre per annum as rent – Appellants approached the High Court seeking to quash the temporary acquisition proceedings or to release the land from acquisition – The High Court rejected the prayer for quashing temporary
COMMISSSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, HYDERABADversusASHWANI HOMEO PHARMACY
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 9525/2018
Decision Date: 03-05-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC483

DINESH MAHESHWARI*, VIKRAM NATH Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985: Chapter 30, First Schedule, Tariff Item 3003 90 14 – Product “Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil” – Classification of, as ‘medicament’ under Tariff Item 3003 90 14 in Chapter 30 or as ‘cosmetic or Item 3305 90 19 in Chapter 33 – Held: Product Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil merits classification as ‘medicament’ under Chapter 30 and not as ‘cosmetic or toilet preparations’ under Chapter 33 – On basis of the twin test-common parlance test as also the
RITU CHHABARIAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 60/2023
Decision Date: 26-04-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC436

KRISHNA MURARI*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.167(2) – Right of default bail – A chargesheet, if can be filed in piecemeal without first completing the investigation and whether the filing of such chargesheet extinguishes the right of an accused for grant of default bail – Held: completing the investigation of a case, a chargesheet or prosecution complaint cannot be filed by an investigating agency only to deprive an arrested accused of his right to default bail u/s.167(2) – Such a chargesheet, if filed, would not extinguish the right to default bail u/s.167(2)
DHARMIN BAI KASHYAPversusBABLI SAHU & OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2517/2023
Decision Date: 16-08-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC712

BELA M. TRIVEDI*, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : Whether the election petition fi led by the petitioner before the Sub Divisional Offi cer seeking relief of recounting of votes alone, without seeking any relief under Rule 6 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices for Membership) Rules, 1995 was maintainable. Election Laws – Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualifi cation for Membership) Rules, 1995 – r.6 – Relief that may be claimed by the petitioner –Election of Sarpanch – Election
SIVANANDAN C T AND OTHERSversusHIGH COURT OF KERALA AND OTHERS
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 229/2017
Decision Date: 12-07-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC709

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, HRISHIKESH ROY, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PANKAJ MITHAL, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Rule 2(c)(iii) of the Kerala State Higher Judicial Services Special Rules 1961 stipulates that 25% of the posts in the category shall be fi lled by Bar “on the basis of aggregate marks/grade obtained in a competitive examination and viva-voce conducted by the High Court”. The scheme of examination specifi cally stipulated that there shall be no cut off marks for the viva voce. Whether the decision of the High Court to prescribe
JUDGEBIR SINGH @ JASBIR SINGH SAMRA @ JASBIR & ORS.versusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1011/2023
Decision Date: 01-05-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC472

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA 1 1 JUDGEBIR SINGH @ JASBIR SINGH SAMRA @ JASBIR & ORS. v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY (Criminal Appeal No. 1011 of 2023) MAY 01, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND J. B. PARDIWALA, J.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss. 167(2), 173 – Default Bail – Entitlement to, passed by a competent authority – Held : It cannot be said that a chargesheet filed without sanction is an incomplete chargesheet which could be termed as not in consonance with s. 173 – According sanction is the duty of the sanctioning authority who is not connected with the
BASAVARAJversusPADMAVATHI & ANR.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 8962/2022
Decision Date: 05-01-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC19

M.R. SHAH*, B.V. NAGARATHNA Specific performance – Suit for specific performance – Respondent No.1 executed agreement to sell dated 13.03.2007 in favour of appellant-buyer agreeing to sell the land in question on or before 31.07.2007 for a sale consideration of Rs.12.74 lakhs - Rs. 3 lakhs were paid as earnest deed – Appellant-buyer filed suit for specific performance on 14.02.2008 – Trial court decreed the suit – High Court set aside the judgment of trial court, mainly on ground that appellant–plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform his part of the contract –
FIRST GLOBAL STOCKBROKING PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusANIL RISHIRAJ & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2151/2011
Decision Date: 21-09-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC845

ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KAROL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Enforcement Offi cer appointed under FERA, 1973 continued to have the authority or competence to fi le a complaint for the off ences punishable under FERA before the expiry of the sunset period provided in sub-section FEMA, 1999. Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 – Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 – On 11.02.2002, the fi rst respondent, who was an Enforcement Offi cer appointed under clause (e) of s.3 of FERA, fi led a complaint against the appellants for various off ences punishable under
MUNILAKSHMIversusNARENDRA BABU & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3297/2023
Decision Date: 20-10-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC943

SURYA KANT*, DIPANKAR DATTA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Bail granted to Respondent No.1 accused of off ences u/ss.109, 120B, 201, 302, 450, 454 r/w s.34, IPC, if to be cancelled, in view of events subsequent to the grant of bail. Bail – Scope of interference – Respondent No.1 was specifi cally named as the murder of his wife – However, change of stance by most vital witnesses, the family members of the deceased within 20 days of their examination-in-chief – Allegations made against Respondent No.1 in the past, of infl uencing the police, hiring goons, repeatedly assaulting the deceased
MOHD MUSLIM @ HUSSAINversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 943/2023
Decision Date: 28-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC311

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.37 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.436A – Appellant accused of committing offences punishable under NDPS Act has been in custody since 2015, if entitled to bail – Held: Recovery of ganja was made from the behest, and on the statement of one of the co-accused – Prosecution relied on that statement, as well as the confessional statement of the appellant – In addition, it also relied on the bank statements of one of the co-accused who allegedly disclosed that money used to be transferred
MOHAMED IBRAHIMversusTHE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6785/2023
Decision Date: 16-10-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC914

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The appellant is aggrieved by a judgment of the High Court, which dismissed his petition, claiming arbitrariness in the declining of his candidature as Assistant Engineer (Electrical) by the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation or employer), on the ground that he was colour blind. Service Law – Disability – Colour blindness – After the medical examination, the appellant was informed that he had colour defective vision (colour blindness) – Corporation cancelled appellant’s
M/S SUNEJA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.versusANITA MERCHANT
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2892/2023
Decision Date: 18-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC391

DINESH MAHESHWARI*, SANJAY KUMAR Consumer Protection Act 1986 : s. 14(1)(d) – Award of compound interest by Consumer Fora – Justification of – On facts, consumer complaints by the complainant-respondent alleging deficiency of service on the part of failed to deliver the possession of three flats booked by her, even after expiry of the agreed period and despite the fact that she had admittedly made payment of 60% of the total sale consideration – Dismissed by the District Forum – However, the State Commission awarded compound
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusARYAN SINGH ETC.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1025/2023
Decision Date: 10-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC338

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 – Saving of inherent powers of the High Court – Accused chargesheeted, on conclusion of the investigations by the CBI – Discharge applications by the two accused – Dismissed by the trial court, and thereafter, the High Court quashed proceedings in exercise of the powers u/s. 482 – On appeal, held: High Court exceeded in its jurisdiction in quashing the entire criminal proceedings in exercise of the limited powers u/s. 482 – At the stage of discharge and/or quashing of the criminal proceedings, while exercising
AJAY SHANKAR SRIVASTAVAversusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 82/2023
Decision Date: 10-04-2023
Disposal: Directions issued
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC346

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 – Verification of certificates of practice and educational degrees – Petitioner challenged an office order dated 01.11.2022 of the Bar Council of India to all the of which (according to the petitioner) was to interdict the process of verification of advocates who are enrolled with the State Bar Councils for scrutinizing the genuineness of their degrees and enrollments – Held: The Bar Council of India apprehends that many advocates who have not
M.A BIVIJIversusSUNITA & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3975/2018
Decision Date: 19-10-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC938

HRISHIKESH ROY*, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The complainant alleged negligence on the part of a Hospital – The main claim of negligence that the complainant attributed was that the forced Nasotracheal Intubation (NI) procedure resulted in her developing Grade-IV Subglottic Stenosis (i.e., narrowing folds and lower border of cricoid cartilage) in the trachea – Subsequently, the same led to various severe complications. Negligence – Medical Negligence – The NCDRC concluded that the negligence charge regarding the unjustifi able ‘NI’ procedure was proved –
SUNEETHA NARREDDYversusY S AVINASH REDDY & ANR
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1251/2023
Decision Date: 24-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC422

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA Investigation – Victim-deceased was found murdered – CBI submitted a chargesheet and supplementary chargesheet naming five persons – CBI issued summons to the first respondent – First respondent appeared before the CBI on several occasions petition – On 18.04.2023, the High Court (i) granted an ad interim stay of arrest; and (ii) directed that the examination before the CBI in the course of the investigation shall be “in printed/written form” during the course of which a questionnaire may also be handed over to
PRASANTA KUMAR SAHOO & ORS.versusCHARULATA SAHU & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2913/2018
Decision Date: 29-03-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC319

A.S. BOPANNA*, J.B. PARDIWALA Hindu Succession Act, 1956– Amendment in law governing the parties – Partition suit – s.6, 1956 Act was amended by 2005 Amendment, before the conclusion of the final decree proceedings – Effect of – Held: Partition suit is required to be decided in stages and regarded as fully and completely decided only when the final decree is passed – Thus, as the law governing the parties was amended before the conclusion of the final decree proceedings, the party benefitted by such amendment (like the two daughters in the present case) can make a request to
IFB AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusSICGIL INDIA LIMITED AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2030/2019
Decision Date: 04-01-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC9

A.S. BOPANNA*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA Companies Act, 2013 : s. 59 – Rectification of register of members – Scope of Rectificatory jurisdiction of National Company Law tribunal-NCLT – Violation of – On facts, respondent No.1 acquired shares of the appellant exceeding 5% of its total shares from and failed to make disclosure as per Reg.7(1) of SAST Regulations and Reg. 13 of PIT Regulations – Appellant filed petition before NCLT u/s 111A of the 1956 Act (now s. 59 of the 2013 Act) for rectification of members register by deleting the name of the respondents as the owners of shares
MANIK HIRU JHANGIANIversusSTATE OF M.P
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3864/2023
Decision Date: 14-12-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1078

ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KAROL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The question arose when the penal action can be taken under both the statutes-Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, which statute would prevail. Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) – ss. 52, 89 – this Act over all other food related laws: Held: Eff ect of s. 89 is that if there is an inconsistency between the provisions of the PFA and the FSSA, s. 89 would operate, and provisions of the FSSA would prevail over the provisions of the PFA to the extent to which the same are inconsistent
M/S UNIBROSversusALL INDIA RADIO
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6895/2023
Decision Date: 19-10-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC931

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Arbitral award in question if in confl ict with the public policy of India and; whether a claim on account of loss of profi t is liable to succeed merely on the ground that there has been delay in the execution of the construction contract, attributable to Act, 1996 – s.34(2)(b) – “Public policy of India” – Appellant awarded work contract by the respondent – Disputes between the parties owing to the delay in work, referred to Arbitrator – Vide First Award, appellant was awarded sum towards loss of
ORBIT ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDEEPAK KISHAN CHHABRIA & ORS.
Case No.: CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1195/2023
Decision Date: 30-10-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC967

English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 ORBIT ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LIMITED versus DEEPAK KISHAN CHHABRIA & ORS. - [2023] 15 S.C.R. 10222023 INSC 967 D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Order dtd.13.10.23 was passed by the Supreme Court directing NCLAT to pronounce judgment in the pending appeal only after the results of the of Finolex Cables Limited were declared. Despite the fact that NCLAT’s attention was drawn to the order of the Supreme Court, it went on to deliver the judgment ignoring the direction therein. Said order, if was in willful defi ance of the Supreme Court’s order. Contempt –
SANKET KUMAR AGARWAL & ANRversusAPG LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 748/2023
Decision Date: 01-05-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC727

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA COURT REPORTS [2023] 5 S.C.R. [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1160 1160 SANKET KUMAR AGARWAL & ANR v. APG LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED (Civil Appeal No. 748 of 2023) MAY 01, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND J B PARDIWALA, J.] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 : ss. 61, 62 , 238A – National of the NCLT – On facts, dismissal of application u/s. 7 by NCLT on 26.08.2022 – Appellant then filed application for obtaining certified copy of the order of NCLT which was uploaded on website and provided to the appellant on 15.09.2022 – e-filing of appeal before NCLAT on