Hibbaan/DIVYADRISHTI huggingface dataset:
M/S SRI MAHAVIR AGENCY & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 982/2023
Decision Date: 17-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC375

ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 : ss.7, 14, 16(1)(a)(i), 19(2) – Food Adulteration – Protection u/s. 19(2), to the vendor – Availability of – Appellant purchased ‘Pan Parag’ from the manufacturer through invoices and Sample of ‘Pan masala’ collected from the business premises of the buyer of pan masala, from the appellant – Samples seized tested and found to be below standard – Appellant’s case that he is merely a vendor who purchased pan masala from the manufacturer in
SUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Case No.: REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 159/2013
Decision Date: 21-03-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC264

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA Constitution of India : Arts. 137 – Review jurisdiction in matters pertaining to capital punishment – Scope of – Petitioner accused a 7-year old child – Conviction u/ss. 364A, 302 and 201 IPC and imposition of death sentence by the courts below – Upheld by this Court – Review thereagainst – Dismissed through circulation – However, in view of the judgment in Mohd. Arif’s case, order
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANRversusM/S. BEADS PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1522/2023
Decision Date: 13-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC213

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) – High Court allowing the writ petition filed by respondent No.1, a subsequent purchaser declared that the acquisition w.r.t the to have lapsed by virtue of s.24(2) – Whether the subsequent purchaser has locus to challenge the acquisition/ lapsing of the acquisition – Held: No – Thus, the High Court erred in entertaining the writ petition preferred by the respondent No.1 being a subsequent purchaser and
DR. JAYA THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 456/2022
Decision Date: 11-07-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC616

BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL Service Law – Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 – s.25(d) – Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 – s.4B(1) – Fundamental Rules, 1922 – Incumbents in the office of the Director of CBI /Director of Enforcement – Extension of tenure – Commission (Amendment) Act, 2021 (whereby two new provisos were inserted to s.25(d) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act), the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Act, 2021 (whereby two new provisos were inserted to s.4B(1) of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946) and
CHENNAI METRO RAIL LIMITED ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGversusM/S TRANSTONNELSTROY AFCONS (JV) & ANR.
Case No.: MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 184/2023
Decision Date: 19-10-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC932

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether revision of fee by an arbitral tribunal would terminate the mandate of the tribunal on as per s. 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – ss. 12, 13 and 14 – Grounds and procedure of challenge – Failure or impossibility of the arbitrator or tribunal to act – Arbitration proceedings between the Decision Date : 19-10-2023 | Case No : MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 184/2023 | Disposal Nature : Disposed off  | Direction Issue : Appeal disposed of and application dismissed.   |  Bench : 2 Judges
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR.versusASHOK KUMAR & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 482/2023
Decision Date: 13-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC220

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) – High Court relying on its decision in Gyanender Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 1393/2014] and the decision of Supreme Court in case, allowed the writ petition and declared that the acquisition w.r.t the land in question is deemed to have lapsed u/s.24(2) on the ground that neither the possession of the land in question was taken nor the compensation was tendered/paid – On appeal, held: Decision in Pune
RAVINDER SINGHversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1031/2023
Decision Date: 25-04-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC426

ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KUMAR Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 432 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 45, 53 – Power to impose a modified punishment – Special category sentencing to life imprisonment in excess of 14 years – Appellant was convicted for having committed offence u/s. 376, 377, 506 imprisonment – Trial Court directed that the appellant should not be given any clemency by the State before he spent at least 20 years in jail – Same was confirmed by the High Court – On appeal, held: It is settled that the power to impose a modified punishment within the
HIND OFFSHORE PVT. LTD.versusIFFCO – TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 7228/2015
Decision Date: 09-08-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC697

A.S. BOPANNA*, M.M. SUNDRESH HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: NCDRC whether justifi ed in passing the impugned order holding that the respondent-insurance company was under no contractual or legal obligation to reimburse the appellant for the loss suff ered by it on account of sinking of the Certifi cate was obtained by the appellant by concealing vital information, with respect to the damage to the vessel, from the Classifi cation Society. Consumer Protection – Marine Hull Insurance Policy – Non- reporting of the damage/defects to the Classifi cation Society before
SAUMYA CHAURASIAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3840/2023
Decision Date: 14-12-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1073

ANIRUDDHA BOSE*, BELA M. TRIVEDI HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellant aggrieved by the order of the High Court dismissing the bail application fi led u/s.439 of Cr.P.C. has preferred this appeal. (i) Whether the appellant was prima facie found involved in the commission of the off ence of money laundering s.3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; (ii) Whether the appellant being a woman should be granted the benefi t of the fi rst proviso to s.45 of the PMLA; (iii) Whether an impudent attempt was sought to be made by alleging all the throughout in the synopsis, list of dates, questions
KRISHAN KUMAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1076/2015
Decision Date: 08-08-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC679

C.T. RAVIKUMAR*, SANJAY KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Conviction of the appellants-accused u/ ss.201, 300, 302, IPC r/w s.34 based on circumstantial evidence, consisting of evidence of last seen, extra judicial confession, recovery of weapon of off ence and motive, if justifi ed. Evidence – Conviction based upon – When not justifi ed: Held: Categoric fi nding of the courts below on appreciation of the oral testimonies of the prosecution witnesses is that none of the witnesses had spoken of having lastly seen the deceased in the company of the accused alive and
M/S. MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 10201/2010
Decision Date: 03-01-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC5

SANJIV KHANNA*, M.M. SUNDRESH Interest Tax Act,1974 – s.2(5-A) and s.2(5-B) – Hire-purchase agreements – Appellants-assessees are credit institutions within meaning of s.2(5-A) – Whether appellants-assessees liable to pay tax on interest component included in hire-purchase instalments paid – ITAT referred to CBDT Circular No. 760 dated 13th January 1998 and observed that hire-purchase agreement is a composite transaction, and has elements of bailment and sale and appellants-assessees are not liable to pay interest tax as hire instalments are not interest on loans and
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANRversusDAYANAND & ANR.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 481/2023
Decision Date: 13-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC219

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) – As per Land Acquisition Collector the possession of the major portion of the land acquired was taken and notice u/s. 12 (2) LA Act was issued to the but he did not come to collect the compensation, then the same was sent to Revenue Deposit – High Court relied upon the Supreme Court decision in case of Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. declared that the acquisition with respect to the land
CHARAN SINGH @ CHARANJIT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 447/2012
Decision Date: 20-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC404

ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 304 B, 498 A and 201 – Dowry Death – Presumption as to dowry death – Prosecution case that woman married two years ago, killed by her husband-appellant and in- laws for dowry – Death was unnatural and the victim was cremated without even informing her the appellant, brother-in-law and mother-in-law u/ss. 304 B, 498 A and 201 and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years u/s 304B, rigorous imprisonment for two years respectively u/ ss. 498A and 201 – In appeal, the conviction and sentence of the brother-in-law
THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRSversusDR. MAHINDRA BHASKAR LIMAYE & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 831/2023
Decision Date: 03-03-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC209

M.R. SHAH*, M.M. SUNDRESH Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 – rr.3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), 6(9) – Validity 4(2)(c), 6(9) which are contrary to the decisions of Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. All Uttar Pradesh Consumer Protection Bar Association [2016] 8 SCR 851 and Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Another [2020] 2 SCR 246 are unconstitutional, arbitrary and
RAJENDRA KUMAR SHRIVASversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1514/2023
Decision Date: 13-03-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC211

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Service Law – Judicial service – Challenge to the appointments in excess of the quota under limited departmental examination – In All India Judges Association & ors. vs Union of India it was specifically directed that there shall be 25% seats reserved for direct recruitment up by regular promotion of Civil Judges (Senior division) and 10% for limited departmental competitive exam – All the High Courts were directed to amend rules with effect from 01.01.2011 – In the writ petition filed before the High Court, it was, inter-alia, prayed to cancel the
BALWINDER SINGH (BINDA)versusTHE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1136/2014
Decision Date: 22-09-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC852

BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, HIMA KOHLI, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to admissibility in evidence of the confessional statement recorded by the Narcotics Control Bureau officers u/s. 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; and proving of possession prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s. 67 – Confession statement made by an accused u/s. 67 before an offi cer of Narcotics Control Bureau – Admissibility in evidence: Held: Statement made by an accused and recorded u/s. 67
C. ANIL CHANDRANversusM.K. RAGHAVAN AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 8915/2012
Decision Date: 30-10-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC962

HIMA KOHLI*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellant was aggrieved by the order dated 14.03.2005, passed by the Chief Engineer, Irrigation and Administration vide which the private respondents No. 1 to 4, 7 and 8 were given seniority from back date. Service Law – In the writ petition fi led by in the year 2004, the High Court directed for consideration of their cases of promotion in the quota reserved for their category – The matter was considered by the Chief Engineer and disposed of vide order dated 14.03.2005 and after condsidering the representations, promotion as
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusDELOITTE HASKINS AND SELLS LLP & ANR
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2305/2022
Decision Date: 03-05-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC484

M.R. SHAH*, M.M. SUNDRESH Companies Act, 2013 – s.140(5) – Analysis and Interpretation of – Maintainability of proceedings u/s.140(5) after resignation of the auditors – s.140(5) empowers the Tribunal (NCLT), either suo motu or on an application made to it by the Central Government or by to take action against the auditor who has acted in a fraudulent manner or is abetting or colluding in fraud with the management of a company – If on completion of an enquiry it is found by the Tribunal that an auditor of a company has, whether directly or indirectly, acted in a
AISH MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 4044/2023
Decision Date: 14-06-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC578

VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH Service Law: Punjab Police Rules, 1934 – rr.8.18 and 16.28 – Power to review proceedings – Compulsorily retirement –Adverse remarks entered into appellant’s Annual Credential Report-ACR, due to which Departmental Enquiry held and the appellant reverted from the post to stoppage of one increment – Adverse remarks entered into ACR, expunged by the Inspector General of Police for a partial period – In a suit, the civil judge interfered with the stoppage of one increment, but not with the ACR – Appellant again filed a representation before the
MOHAR SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH COLLECTOR & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 7504/2023
Decision Date: 07-11-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1019

English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 MOHAR SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH COLLECTOR & ORS. - [2023] 14 S.C.R. 8422023 INSC 1019 SURYA KANT, DIPANKAR DATTA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellants if entitled to seek parity with their co-villagers in the grant of compensation for their acquired land despite the inordinate delay in fi ling fi rst appeals. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation with co-villagers – Delay of 13 years in fi ling of the fi rst appeals – Condonation: Held: Appellants are entitled to seek parity with their co-villagers in the grant of compensation for their acquired land – The inordinate delay in fi ling appeal in compensatory matters, per Decision Date : 07-11-2023 | Case No : CIVIL APPEAL No. 7504/2023 | Disposal Nature : Appeal(s) allowed  | Direction Issue : Appeals partly allowed.  |  Bench : 2 Judges
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusGEETA DEVI AND OTHERS
Case No.: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 19992/2023
Decision Date: 30-10-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC954

C.T. RAVIKUMAR*, SANJAY KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: After motor vehicle accident, it came to light that the driver of the vehicle had fake driving licence. The High Court opined that the petitioner-insurance company had neither pleaded nor proved that the deceased vehicle adequate steps to verify the genuineness of the driving licence and in the absence of such a plea on its part, the Tribunal could not have concluded that there was a breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy. Whether order of the High Court justifi ed. Motor Vehicle Act, 1988
THE STATE OF GOAversusSUMMIT ONLINE TRADE SOLUTIONS (P) LTD & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1700/2023
Decision Date: 14-03-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC229

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Writ Jurisdiction of the High Court – Cause of Action/Part of cause of action – Concept of, u/Art. 226(2) – Notification issued by the State of Goa levying 14% tax on Lottery authorised by State Government – Challenged to, by the being run by the State of Sikkim, in various States including Goa, in a writ petition before the High Court of Sikkim – Applications by the State of Goa before the High Court for deletion of its name from the array of respondent on the ground that notification under a statute enacted by
NO.15138812Y L/NK GURSEWAK SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1791/2023
Decision Date: 27-07-2023
Disposal: Case Partly allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC648

ABHAY S. OKA*, SANJAY KAROL Penal Code, 1860: s. 304 Part I, s 300 exception 4 – Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder – Appellant and the victim, both Lance Naik in the Indian Army – Altercation between them on the issue of seniority, after consuming liquor – Appellant snatched the bullet at him, resulting in the death of the victim – Appellant convicted by the court martial for the offence punishable u/s. 302 rw s. 69 of the Army Act and sentenced to imprisonment for life – Order of conviction and sentence upheld by the courts below – On appeal, held:
THE SECRETARY, LAND & BUILDING DEPT. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORSversusOM PRAKASH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 424/2023
Decision Date: 20-01-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC71

M.R. SHAH*, HIMA KOHLI LAND & BUILDING DEPT. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. v. OM PRAKASH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.424 of 2023) 20th JANUARY 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND HIMA KOHLI JJ.] Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: s. to subject land is deemed to have lapsed in view of s.24(2) – High Court held the acquisition is deemed to have lapsed on the ground that compensation with respect to the land was not tendered – Sustainability of – Held: Not sustainable – Possession of the land was
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSHAKUNTLA DEVI AND ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 342/2023
Decision Date: 20-01-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC62

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 : s. 24(2) – Land acquisition when deemed to have lapsed – Writ petition by the private respondent-writ petitioner seeking declaration that acquisition proceedings pertaining to in view of s.24(2) – High Court allowed the writ petition on the ground that compensation has not been paid or tendered – Sustainability of – Held: Not sustainable – Possession was taken over by the Land Acquisition Collector and handed over to the beneficiary by
M/S INDIAN MEDICINES PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION LTDversusKERALA AYURVEDIC CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6693/2022
Decision Date: 03-01-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC7

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, HIMA KOHLI Constitution of India: Art.14 – Government Contracts – Transparent and non-arbitrary method to be adopted by the Government – Decision of the government regarding purchase of the Ayurvedic Drugs only from the – Challenged on the ground that selection of IMPCL by the government is arbitrary and illegal by virtue of Art. 14 – High Court held that by virtue of Para 4(vi)(b) of the Operational Guidelines, the government was to invite supply of the drugs from various pharmacies and PSU
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERSversusDINESH SINGH AND ANOTHER
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 8142/2023
Decision Date: 14-12-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1070

 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS versus DINESH SINGH AND ANOTHER - [2023] 16 S.C.R. 10462023 INSC 1070 M.M. SUNDRESH, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: On a reading of r.9, Haryana Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 2008, letters dated 30.05.2019 and 09.07.2019, whether 01.11.2018 can be said to be the cut-off period uniformly applicable qua all the eligibility conditions provided or is such date to be considered as the cut-off date only for the purpose of determining age-related eligibility and; if 01.11.2018 is to be held as the cut off only for the limited purpose, whether the respondent satisfi ed the other eligibility conditions and whether it can be said that there