VEENA GUPTA & ANRversusCENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1865/2022
Decision Date: 30-01-2024
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC89

English  नेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 VEENA GUPTA & ANR versus CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ORS.  - [2024] 1 S.C.R. 11852024 INSC 89 PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ARAVIND KUMAR Issue for Consideration Whether the impugned orders passed by National Green Tribunal – order arising out of an ex parte order in suo motu proceedings holding the appellants guilty and directing payment of compensation; and order of dismissal of the appellant No.2 alleging that he had not been given opportunity before adverse order was passed against him, were not sustainable. Headnotes Practice and Procedure – Opportunity of hearing to affected party – National Green Tribunal’s recurrent engagement in unilateral decision 

Summary: Englishनेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.VEENA GUPTA & ANRversusCENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ORS.-[2024] 1 S.C.R. 11852024 INSC 89Coram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ARAVIND KUMARIssue for Consideration Whether the impugned orders passed by National Green Tribunal – order arising out of an ex parte order in suo motu proceedings holding the appellants guilty and directing payment of compensation; and order of dismissal of the appellant No.2 alleging that he had not been given opportunity before adverse order was passed against him, were not sustainable. Headnotes Practice and Procedure – Opportunity of hearing to affected party – National Green Tribunal’s recurrent engagement in unilateral decision