ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2493/2024
Decision Date: 12-07-2024
Disposal: Matter referred to larger bench
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC512

SANJIV KHANNA*, DIPANKAR DATTA Issue for Consideration Validity of arrest of the appellant under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; scope and ambit of the Courts to examine the legality of the arrest under Section 19; whether the Court while examining the validity of arrest in terms of Section 19(1) of into and examine the necessity and need to arrest; whether interim bail ought to be granted to the appellant. Headnotes† Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – s.19(1) – “need and necessity to arrest”, if a separate ground to be considered beyond the conditions Decision Date : 12-07-2024 | Case No : CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2493/2024 | Disposal Nature : Matter referred to larger bench  | Direction Issue : nterim bail granted to the appellant. Questions of law referred to a larger Bench.  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT-[2024] 7 S.C.R. 23632024 INSC 512Coram : SANJIV KHANNA*, DIPANKAR DATTAIssue for Consideration Validity of arrest of the appellant under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; scope and ambit of the Courts to examine the legality of the arrest under Section 19; whether the Court while examining the validity of arrest in terms of Section 19(1) of into and examine the necessity and need to arrest; whether interim bail ought to be granted to the appellant. Headnotes† Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – s.19(1) – “need and necessity to arrest”, if a separate ground to be considered beyond the conditionsDecision Date :12-07-2024| Case No :CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2493/2024| Disposal Nature :Matter referred to larger bench| Direction Issue :nterim bail granted to the appellant. Questions of law referred to a larger Bench.|  Bench :2 Judges