XversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Case No.: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 13378/2024
Decision Date: 27-11-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC909

English हिन्दी - Hindi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 X versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. - [2024] 11 S.C.R. 9412024 INSC 909 J.B. PARDIWALA, R MAHADEVAN Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards accused being enlarged on bail in rape case by the High Court, when the victim and the mother who was the eye-witness to the incident were yet to be examined. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438 - Grant of bail to person enlarged on bail in rape case by the High Court, when only one witness was examined and the victim and the mother who was the eye-witness to the incident were yet to be examined – Propriety: Held: In the instant case, the victim is yet to be examined and her mother who, is an eye-witness Decision Date : 27-11-2024 | Case No : SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 13378/2024  | Direction Issue : Special Leave Petition disposed of.  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishहिन्दी - HindiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.XversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.-[2024] 11 S.C.R. 9412024 INSC 909Coram : J.B. PARDIWALA, R MAHADEVANIssue for Consideration Issue arose as regards accused being enlarged on bail in rape case by the High Court, when the victim and the mother who was the eye-witness to the incident were yet to be examined. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438 - Grant of bail to person enlarged on bail in rape case by the High Court, when only one witness was examined and the victim and the mother who was the eye-witness to the incident were yet to be examined – Propriety: Held: In the instant case, the victim is yet to be examined and her mother who, is an eye-witnessDecision Date :27-11-2024| Case No :SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 13378/2024| Direction Issue :Special Leave Petition disposed of.|  Bench :2 Judges