BRIJ NARAYAN SHUKLA (D) THR. LRS.versusSUDESH KUMAR ALIAS SURESH KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 7502/2012
Decision Date: 03-01-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC9

VIKRAM NATH*, RAJESH BINDAL Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for the relief of injunction with alternative relief for possession on the ground of limitation as the respondent perfected their rights Headnotes Adverse possession – Suit by the appellant for the relief of injunction with alternative relief for possession – Dismissed by the High Court on the ground of limitation as the respondent perfected their rights by adverse possession having continued so since 1944 when the Decision Date : 03-01-2024 | Case No : CIVIL APPEAL No. 7502/2012  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishनेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.BRIJ NARAYAN SHUKLA (D) THR. LRS.versusSUDESH KUMAR ALIAS SURESH KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.-[2024] 1 S.C.R. 602024 INSC 9Coram : VIKRAM NATH*, RAJESH BINDALIssue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for the relief of injunction with alternative relief for possession on the ground of limitation as the respondent perfected their rights Headnotes Adverse possession – Suit by the appellant for the relief of injunction with alternative relief for possession – Dismissed by the High Court on the ground of limitation as the respondent perfected their rights by adverse possession having continued so since 1944 when theDecision Date :03-01-2024| Case No :CIVIL APPEAL No. 7502/2012|  Bench :2 Judges