RAGHUVEER SHARANversusDISTRICT SAHAKARI KRISHI GRAMIN VIKAS BANK & ANR.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2764/2024
Decision Date: 10-09-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC681

PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Issue for Consideration Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is entitled for protection under Section 132 of the Evidence Act, 1872 as his statement was recorded earlier at the pre-summoning stage as a witness for Evidence Act, 1872 – s.132 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 319 – A criminal complaint was filed, the appellant was also examined as one of the witnesses of the respondent bank, wherein he admitted having changed the tenure of the Fixed Deposit from Decision Date : 10-09-2024 | Case No : CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2764/2024  | Direction Issue : Appeal dismissed. Contempt petition disposed of.  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishहिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.RAGHUVEER SHARANversusDISTRICT SAHAKARI KRISHI GRAMIN VIKAS BANK & ANR.-[2024] 9 S.C.R. 3612024 INSC 681Coram : PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRAIssue for Consideration Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is entitled for protection under Section 132 of the Evidence Act, 1872 as his statement was recorded earlier at the pre-summoning stage as a witness for Evidence Act, 1872 – s.132 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 319 – A criminal complaint was filed, the appellant was also examined as one of the witnesses of the respondent bank, wherein he admitted having changed the tenure of the Fixed Deposit fromDecision Date :10-09-2024| Case No :CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2764/2024| Direction Issue :Appeal dismissed. Contempt petition disposed of.|  Bench :2 Judges