JUGAL KISHORE KHANNA (D) THR. LRS. & ANR.versusSUDHIR KHANNA & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1591/2020
Decision Date: 19-03-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC224

VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in finding without any evidence that the amount alleged to have been paid as the value of share in Joint Hindu Family property is not so but for some other purpose. Headnotes Partition Suit – Predecessors - the elder (“RKK”) and younger (“ACK”) brother respectively – two properties purchased by RKK – (i) Kamla Nagar property in the name of his father (ii) Malcha Marg property in the name of ACK’s wife and constructed house out of Joint Hindu Family Decision Date : 19-03-2024 | Case No : CIVIL APPEAL No. 1591/2020  | Direction Issue : Civil Appeal No.1591 of 2020 allowed and Civil Appeal No.1592 of 2020 dismissed  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishहिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.JUGAL KISHORE KHANNA (D) THR. LRS. & ANR.versusSUDHIR KHANNA & ORS.-[2024] 3 S.C.R. 8382024 INSC 224Coram : VIKRAM NATH*, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAHIssue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in finding without any evidence that the amount alleged to have been paid as the value of share in Joint Hindu Family property is not so but for some other purpose. Headnotes Partition Suit – Predecessors - the elder (“RKK”) and younger (“ACK”) brother respectively – two properties purchased by RKK – (i) Kamla Nagar property in the name of his father (ii) Malcha Marg property in the name of ACK’s wife and constructed house out of Joint Hindu FamilyDecision Date :19-03-2024| Case No :CIVIL APPEAL No. 1591/2020| Direction Issue :Civil Appeal No.1591 of 2020 allowed and Civil Appeal No.1592 of 2020 dismissed|  Bench :2 Judges