TEJ BHAN (D) THROUGH LR. & ORS.versusRAM KISHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6557/2022
Decision Date: 09-12-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC945

 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 TEJ BHAN (D) THROUGH LR. & ORS. versus RAM KISHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. - [2024] 12 S.C.R. 5002024 INSC 945 PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, SANDEEP MEHTA Issue for Consideration Clarity and certainty in the interpretation of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Headnotes† Hindu Succession Act, 1956 – s.14 – Clarity and certainity in interpretation: Held: This Court noticed that while following Tulsamma, in Thota Sesharathamma, Masilamani Mudaliar and Shakuntala Devi have made passing observations about the discordant note in the case of Karmi, Bhura and Gumpha but they have not been clearly and categorically overruled – Perhaps this is the reason why the subsequent decisions consistently Decision Date : 09-12-2024 | Case No : CIVIL APPEAL No. 6557/2022  | Direction Issue : Matter referred to Chief Justice for constituting appropriate Bench  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.TEJ BHAN (D) THROUGH LR. & ORS.versusRAM KISHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.-[2024] 12 S.C.R. 5002024 INSC 945Coram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, SANDEEP MEHTAIssue for Consideration Clarity and certainty in the interpretation of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Headnotes† Hindu Succession Act, 1956 – s.14 – Clarity and certainity in interpretation: Held: This Court noticed that while following Tulsamma, in Thota Sesharathamma, Masilamani Mudaliar and Shakuntala Devi have made passing observations about the discordant note in the case of Karmi, Bhura and Gumpha but they have not been clearly and categorically overruled – Perhaps this is the reason why the subsequent decisions consistentlyDecision Date :09-12-2024| Case No :CIVIL APPEAL No. 6557/2022| Direction Issue :Matter referred to Chief Justice for constituting appropriate Bench|  Bench :2 Judges