BIDYUT SARKAR & ANR.versusKANCHILAL PAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 10509/2013
Decision Date: 28-08-2024
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC704

 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 BIDYUT SARKAR & ANR. versus KANCHILAL PAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR. - [2024] 8 S.C.R. 9842024 INSC 704 VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards admissibility of the insufficiently stamped agreement to sell. Headnotes† Stamp Act, 1899 – ss.35, 36, 40 and 42 – Instruments not duly stamped inadmissible in evidence, etc. – Suit for specific performance of contract based filed by the respondent no. 1 against the defendant no. 1-owner of the property – Trial court dismissed the suit on the finding that the agreement to sell not admissible in evidence being insufficiently stamped – Appeal thereagainst by the respondent no. 1 allowed by the High Court 

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.BIDYUT SARKAR & ANR.versusKANCHILAL PAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR.-[2024] 8 S.C.R. 9842024 INSC 704Coram : VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALEIssue for Consideration Issue arose as regards admissibility of the insufficiently stamped agreement to sell. Headnotes† Stamp Act, 1899 – ss.35, 36, 40 and 42 – Instruments not duly stamped inadmissible in evidence, etc. – Suit for specific performance of contract based filed by the respondent no. 1 against the defendant no. 1-owner of the property – Trial court dismissed the suit on the finding that the agreement to sell not admissible in evidence being insufficiently stamped – Appeal thereagainst by the respondent no. 1 allowed by the High Court