SUKHMANDER SINGH AND ORS ETC.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ETC.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1511/2021
Decision Date: 11-09-2024
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC736

HRISHIKESH ROY*, SUDHANSHU DHULIA, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the criteria on the basis of which selection was made could be made the legal basis for selection and appointment of Laboratory Attendants. Headnotes† Service law – Selection/appointment – Post of Selection process for 31 vacancies – 1,952 candidates shortlisted for interview after the written test – Publication of final select list – Challenge to, by the unsuccessful candidates – Single Judge annulled the selection process observing that the process was irregular 

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.SUKHMANDER SINGH AND ORS ETC.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ETC.-[2024] 10 S.C.R. 982024 INSC 736Coram : HRISHIKESH ROY*, SUDHANSHU DHULIA, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTIIssue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the criteria on the basis of which selection was made could be made the legal basis for selection and appointment of Laboratory Attendants. Headnotes† Service law – Selection/appointment – Post of Selection process for 31 vacancies – 1,952 candidates shortlisted for interview after the written test – Publication of final select list – Challenge to, by the unsuccessful candidates – Single Judge annulled the selection process observing that the process was irregular