RANJEET MITTALversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. ETC.
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3680/2024
Decision Date: 03-09-2024
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC766

 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 RANJEET MITTAL versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. ETC. - [2024] 9 S.C.R. 8112024 INSC 766 VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE Issue for Consideration High Court whether justified in quashing the charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 (husband and in-laws of the victim-deceased) holding that prima facie the respondents did not abet the deceased to commit suicide. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, Penal Code, 1860 – ss.498-A, 306, 34, 302, 201 – Victim died after allegedly falling off from terrace – Trial court framed charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 for abetment to commit suicide – Charges if rightly quashed by High Court: Held: No – High Court erred Decision Date : 03-09-2024 | Case No : CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3680/2024 | Disposal Nature : Appeal(s) allowed  | Direction Issue : In view of the divergent of opinion, the appeal papers directed to be placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India for assigning the same to the appropriate Bench.  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.RANJEET MITTALversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. ETC.-[2024] 9 S.C.R. 8112024 INSC 766Coram : VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALEIssue for Consideration High Court whether justified in quashing the charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 (husband and in-laws of the victim-deceased) holding that prima facie the respondents did not abet the deceased to commit suicide. Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, Penal Code, 1860 – ss.498-A, 306, 34, 302, 201 – Victim died after allegedly falling off from terrace – Trial court framed charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 for abetment to commit suicide – Charges if rightly quashed by High Court: Held: No – High Court erredDecision Date :03-09-2024| Case No :CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3680/2024| Disposal Nature :Appeal(s) allowed| Direction Issue :In view of the divergent of opinion, the appeal papers directed to be placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India for assigning the same to the appropriate Bench.|  Bench :2 Judges