MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD.versusBRAJRAJNAGAR COAL MINES WORKERS’ UNION
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 4092/2024
Decision Date: 12-03-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC199

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA*, SANDEEP MEHTA Issue for Consideration Whether the Tribunal was justified in entertaining the reference of an industrial dispute when a binding settlement under Section 18 (1) read with Section 19(2) and Section 36 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 was arrived at between Act, 1947-Section 10 - Reference of disputes; Section 18 (1) read with Section 19(2) - Settlement binding on all parties. 32 workers, working continuously for 10 years, sought regularisation on the basis of Clause 11.5.1 and Clause 11.5.2 of the National Wage Agreement IV - Settlement arrived Decision Date : 12-03-2024 | Case No : CIVIL APPEAL No. 4092/2024  | Direction Issue : Appeals dismissed with directions  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishଓଡ଼ିଆ - Odiaਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD.versusBRAJRAJNAGAR COAL MINES WORKERS’ UNION-[2024] 3 S.C.R. 6272024 INSC 199Coram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA*, SANDEEP MEHTAIssue for Consideration Whether the Tribunal was justified in entertaining the reference of an industrial dispute when a binding settlement under Section 18 (1) read with Section 19(2) and Section 36 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 was arrived at between Act, 1947-Section 10 - Reference of disputes; Section 18 (1) read with Section 19(2) - Settlement binding on all parties. 32 workers, working continuously for 10 years, sought regularisation on the basis of Clause 11.5.1 and Clause 11.5.2 of the National Wage Agreement IV - Settlement arrivedDecision Date :12-03-2024| Case No :CIVIL APPEAL No. 4092/2024| Direction Issue :Appeals dismissed with directions|  Bench :2 Judges