Hibbaan/DIVYADRISHTI huggingface dataset:
SYNDICATE BANKversusN. R. BHAT
Case No.: SPECIAL LEAVE TO PETITION (CIVIL)... No. 7277/2020
Decision Date: 10-10-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1064

English हिन्दी - Hindi नेपाली - Nepaliਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 SYNDICATE BANK versus N. R. BHAT - [2023] 15 S.C.R. 4752023 INSC 1064 HIMA KOHLI, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter was settled between the parties (respondent-employee and petitioner-bank) by virtue of the Joint Compromise Memo dated 17.06.2019, however, the High Court permitted the respondent-employee to exercise the option of availing directed the petitioner-bank to pass appropriate orders. Service Law – Respondent-employee was dismissed by petitioner- bank – Before the High Court, the parties arrived at an amicable settlement in terms of a Joint Memo dated 17.06.2019 where under the petitioner-Bank agreed to
GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHERversusBHANU PRATAP SINGH
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 8549/2014
Decision Date: 19-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC393

AJAY RASTOGI*, BELA M. TRIVEDI Constitution of India – Article 226 – Registered lease deed – Alteration/amendment u/Article 226 – Impermissibility of – Appellants invited bids in 1997 for grant of leases of different plots under the transport city scheme 27887.50 sq. meters @ Rs.725/- per sq. meter was accepted and the aforesaid plot area was leased out in his favour for Rs.2,06,67,966/- to be paid in four instalments after making the advance payment of Rs.15 lakhs as earnest money – Instalments were to be deposited by October 1999
RAMESH KUMARversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1741/2023
Decision Date: 04-07-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC596

 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 RAMESH KUMAR versus  STATE OF NCT OF DELHI - [2023] 9 S.C.R. 11652023 INSC 596 S. RAVINDRA BHAT, DIPANKAR DATTA Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438 – Anticipatory Bail – Payment of amount as a condition precedent for grant of bail – Legality of – An FIR was registered u/ss. 420, 406 r/w s. 34 – As per the FIR, an agreement to sell was executed by and between the of Rs. 17,00,000/- by issuing cheques favouring the appellant-owner allegedly on the instructions of the builder – Complainants were not handed over the floor which they intended to purchase – Apprehending arrest, the appellant moved an application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. before the
CCE, AURANGABADversusM/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 5622/2009
Decision Date: 29-03-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC313

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – First Schedule – Chapter 90 – LCD panels – Classification of – CESTAT held that the LCD panels imported by assesses were classifiable in Chapter Heading 9013.8010 of the First Schedule to the 1975 Act – Held: Reasoning and conclusion under Chapter 90, Entry 9013.8010, is sound and unexceptionable. Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – First Schedule – Section XVI, XVII – Chapters 85 and 90 – General Interpretive Rules and Notes – Plea of revenue that by virtue of Note 2 (b) to Chapter 85, the goods are
COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, PATNAversusM/S SHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND COMPANY PVT. LTD. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3991/2023
Decision Date: 13-10-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC910

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the educational institutions-Indian Institute of Technology, Patna and the National Institute of Technology, Rourkela are covered by the defi nition of Service Tax Exemption Notifi cation inter alia exempting various services from the tax network rendered to government, governmental, or local authorities. Tax/Taxation – Service tax – Exemption from – Eligibility – Educational institutions-IIT Patna and NIT Rourkela if
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusBHUPENDRA YADAV
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 5984/2023
Decision Date: 20-09-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC837

HIMA KOHLI*, RAJESH BINDAL HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the appellants have erred in rejecting the candidature of the respondent to the post of Constable, despite the latter having truthfully disclosed in his affi davit the fact that he had faced trial in a criminal case which had resulted Service Law – Rejection of candidature by the departmental authorities on basis of moral turpitude – Propriety: Held: An employer has the discretion to terminate or condone an omission in the disclosure made by a candidate – While doing so, the employer must act with
RAJALAKSHMIversusTHE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) KOYILANDY & ANOTHER
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2363/2023
Decision Date: 10-04-2023
Disposal: Disposed off
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC333

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Just and fair compensation – Lands in question were acquired for setting up of an IT Park – Many landowners accepted the compensation at negotiated price of Rs. 1,00,000/- per cent – Present – Reference Court enhanced the compensation – High Court awarded the compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,35,000/- per cent by giving 35% rise to the negotiated price of Rs. 1,00,000/- per cent – Correctness of – Held: High Court rightly took into consideration the
DR. BALRAM SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 324/2020
Decision Date: 20-10-2023
Disposal: Directions issued
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC950

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, ARAVIND KUMAR HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Implementation of the provisions of Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 and the Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993. Prohibition of Employment and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 – Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993 – Directions by Supreme Court – Eradication of manual scavenging in a phased manner – Rehabilitation measures – Compensation for sewer
RUPESH MANGER (THAPA)versusSTATE OF SIKKIM
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2069/2022
Decision Date: 13-09-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC826

J.B. PARDIWALA*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court reversed the order of acquittal of the trial Court and convicted appellant-accused u/s.302 IPC, whether the case of the appellant-accused falls within the exception u/s. 84 of IPC or not. Penal Code, 1860 – Appellant-accused deceased with sharp-edged weapon causing his death – Appellant pleaded insanity: Held: During preliminary examination, CW-1-doctor categorically deposed that going by the case history of the accused prepared by the Hospital, appellant had earlier been treated for acute and transient
STATE OF PUNJABversusKEWAL KRISHAN
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2128/2014
Decision Date: 21-06-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC583

English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 STATE OF PUNJAB versus KEWAL KRISHAN - [2023] 10 S.C.R. 12023 INSC 583 B.V. NAGARATHNA, MANOJ MISRA Penal Code, 1860 – s. 302 – Acquittal confirmed – Prosecution case that the deceased was last seen alive in his own house in the company of the accused at about 7.00 p.m. on 10.12.1998 – PW-6, nephew of the deceased discovered body of deceased on 12.12.1998 – FIR was – PW-2, the sole witness of the last seen circumstance, in his deposition in court, stated that he had expressed his suspicion in respect of accused’s involvement to the police on 13.12.1998 – It was also alleged that accused made an extra-judicial confession before PW-3
IN RE: INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND THE INDIAN STAMP ACT 1899versus.
Case No.: CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 44/2023
Decision Date: 13-12-2023
Disposal: Directions issued
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC1066

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL*, SANJIV KHANNA, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, SURYA KANT, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA HEADNOTES Issue at hand arose in the context of three statutes; the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Stamp Act imposes duty on “instruments”. Arbitration agreements are often embedded in underlying instruments or substantive Decision Date : 13-12-2023 | Case No : CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 44/2023 | Disposal Nature : Directions issued  | Direction Issue : Matters to be placed before appropriate Bench  |  Bench : 7 Judges
DELMA LUBNA COELHOversusEDMOND CLINT FERNANDES
Case No.: TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1475/2021
Decision Date: 18-04-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC389

RAJESH BINDAL*, ARAVIND KUMAR Transfer Petition – Divorce petition was filed by husband before Family Judge, Mangaluru, Karnataka – Present petition filed by wife, a permanent resident of Canada, presently based at Mumbai, Maharashtra seeking transfer of divorce petition from Mangaluru, Karnataka to Family Court at is a permanent resident of Canada – She had shifted there in the year 2014 and was working there on a well-paid job, however, came to India for the matrimonial alliance – As the petitioner is a permanent resident of Canada, she must be travelling abroad regularly – She
SHIRDI NAGAR PANCHAYATversusKISHOR SHARAD BORAWAKE AND OTHERS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 6087/2023
Decision Date: 22-09-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC851

BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI*, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The High Court by order dated 04.07.2019 partly allowed the petition fi led by the respondents/landowners challenging the notifi cation dated 18.08.2004, whereby respondents’/landowners’ land was converted to development/green zone’, subject to appellant’s receiving 10% as ‘amenity space’ and 10% as ‘open space’ of the total land area. Land Use Conversion – Land owners and plot holders contended that the ownership of the ‘open space’ and the
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHIversusSUBHASH GUPTA & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 737/2023
Decision Date: 09-02-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC108

M.R. SHAH*, C.T. RAVIKUMAR Land Acquisition – Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – s.24(2) – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Possession of the land in question could not be taken because of the operation of the stay order in a writ Court till 11.02.2015 – Therefore, there was a stay operating against the taking over of the possession even on the day on which the Act, 2013 came into force – High Court however, relying upon its’ earlier decision in the case of Jagjit Singh and the decision of Supreme Court
VINOD KUMAR SACHDEVA (DEAD) THR LRSversusASHOK KUMAR SACHDEVA & ORS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 4656/2023
Decision Date: 25-07-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC650

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 – s.8 – Reference to arbitration – When erred – MoU was arrived at between brothers- the appellant and the first respondent wherein were to be liquidated to repay the liabilities of the business – MoU contained an arbitration agreement – Suits instituted by the appellant, first respondent filed applications u/s.8 seeking reference to arbitration – Applications dismissed by Trial Court – Order set
BATLIBOI ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS LIMITEDversusHINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 1968/2012
Decision Date: 21-09-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC850

SANJIV KHANNA*, M.M. SUNDRESH HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was justifi ed in allowing the appeal fi led by the respondents u/s. 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and thereby setting aside the and Conciliation Act, 1996 – s. 37 – Arbitral award – Interference with – Award of turnkey contract to the appellant by the respondents for a contract value to be completed within stipulated period – Delay in project completion which was extended, and thereafter
HARBHAJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1480/2011
Decision Date: 25-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC424

ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: ss. 25, 35 – Applicability of s. 25 – When – Presumption of culpable mental state u/s. 35 – When, available –On facts, truck found lying turtle and bags of powder scattered which on investigation found to be and the cleaner coming out of the truck and disclosed the name of the owner- appellant, and fled away – Conviction of the appellant u/s. 25 and imposition of imprisonment for 10 years by the courts below – On appeal, held: s. 25 provides that if an owner of a vehicle knowingly
R. HEMALATHAversusKASHTHURI
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2535/2023
Decision Date: 10-04-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC336

Unknown
M/S. SANVIRA INDUSTRIESversusRAIN CII CARBON (VIZAG) LTD. & ORS.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3834/2023
Decision Date: 03-07-2023
Disposal: Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC586

S. RAVINDRA BHAT*, DIPANKAR DATTA Environment – Issue as to allocation of quantities of raw pet- coke (RPC) – Increased allocation to the appellant – Challenged by respondent, writ petition dismissed by Single Judge of High Court – Division Bench set aside the minutes of the meeting as well as the decision pet-coke – Appellant inter alia contended that there was a change of criteria adopted in the Public Notice dtd.17.04.2020 issued by the GOI and contrary to the earlier requirement of certification of production capacity by the Unit, the said Public Notice required certification by the
SARNAM SINGHversusSHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3900/2023
Decision Date: 04-07-2023
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC597

ABHAY S. OKA*, RAJESH BINDAL Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Motor Accident – Permanent disability of an injured affecting his functional disability – Compensation – Assessment of – Held:Any physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of the work person who suffered disability – On facts, the gunman employed with the company met with an accident resulting in 85% disability on account of amputation of his right lower limb, and pursuant thereto, his services were terminated on account of his inability to discharge his duties – Decision Date : 04-07-2023 | Case No : CIVIL APPEAL No. 3900/2023  |  Bench : 2 Judges
PRAMOD SINGLAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS
Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1051/2023
Decision Date: 10-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC344

English हिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabiతెలుగు - Telugu 




 Disclaimer 


 
								 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. 
						Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
						 PRAMOD SINGLA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS - [2023] 2 S.C.R. 7932023 INSC 344 KRISHNA MURARI, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 – Preventive Detention – Representation by detenue to the Central Government, the detaining authority and the Advisory Board – Central Govt. if bound to wait for the decision of the Advisory Board Whether there exists an incongruity between the Pankaj Kumar case and the Abdullah Kunhi case – Held: No – Since these two judgments exist symbiotically and apply to two separate authorities within the COFEPOSA Act, there exists no friction between the judgments – The mandate to
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND ANRversusSRI M. NARASIMHA PRASAD
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 2519/2019
Decision Date: 10-04-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC342

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN*, PANKAJ MITHAL Service Law – Respondent was appointed as a Civil Judge (Junior Division) – Respondent was suspended from service on allegations of gross misconduct, followed by the initiation of disciplinary proceedings – As per the enquiry reports, some charges stood proved and were not proved – Full Court of the High Court resolved to impose the penalty of dismissal from service upon the respondent – Based on the resolution, respondent was dismissed from service – Respondent challenged the findings of the enquiry officer and the order of dismissal
SHELLY OBEROI & ANR.versusOFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.
Case No.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 152/2023
Decision Date: 17-02-2023
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed
Neutral Citation: 2023INSC132

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD*, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA COURT REPORTS [2023] 5 S.C.R.[2023] 5 S.C.R. 582 582 SHELLY OBEROI & ANR. v. OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No 152 of 2023) FEBRUARY 17, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA AND J. B. PARDIWALA] Delhi Municipal of the municipal corporation to vote – Held: At the first meeting of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, the election shall be held first for the post of Mayor and upon the election of the Mayor, the Mayor shall act as the presiding authority for conducting the election of the Deputy Mayor