NEELAM GUPTA & ORS.versusRAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL No. 3159/2019
Decision Date: 14-10-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC769

C.T. RAVIKUMAR*, SANJAY KUMAR Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the impugned judgment is to be sustained in view of the indisputable or undisputed facts; whether the suit schedule property is the Joint Hindu Family property; whether the finding of the High Court that the plaintiff is the owner of the suit correct conclusion on assimilation of facts and appreciation of evidence; and whether the High Court was right in declining to accept the appellants’ contention that they perfected the title over the suit land by adverse possession. Headnotes† Adverse possession – Title to the Decision Date : 14-10-2024 | Case No : CIVIL APPEAL No. 3159/2019  | Direction Issue : Appeals dismissed. Contempt petition closed.  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishहिन्दी - Hindiਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.NEELAM GUPTA & ORS.versusRAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.-[2024] 10 S.C.R. 7082024 INSC 769Coram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR*, SANJAY KUMARIssue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the impugned judgment is to be sustained in view of the indisputable or undisputed facts; whether the suit schedule property is the Joint Hindu Family property; whether the finding of the High Court that the plaintiff is the owner of the suit correct conclusion on assimilation of facts and appreciation of evidence; and whether the High Court was right in declining to accept the appellants’ contention that they perfected the title over the suit land by adverse possession. Headnotes† Adverse possession – Title to theDecision Date :14-10-2024| Case No :CIVIL APPEAL No. 3159/2019| Direction Issue :Appeals dismissed. Contempt petition closed.|  Bench :2 Judges