LEHNA SINGH (D) BY LRS.versusGURNAM SINGH (D) BY LRS. & ORS.
Case No.: REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1025/2019
Decision Date: 16-05-2024
Disposal: Unknown
Neutral Citation: 2024INSC429

VIKRAM NATH*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the questions of law are not required to be framed in second appeal before Punjab and Haryana High Court whose jurisdiction in second appeal is circumscribed by provision of s.41 of the Punjab Act. Headnotes† Code of Civil s.100 – Punjab Courts Act, 1918 – s. 41 – Second appeal – Framing of a substantial question of law for entertaining the second appeal – Requirement – On facts, suit for perpetual injunction by the plaintiff against the defendant that he and his brother were Decision Date : 16-05-2024 | Case No : REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1025/2019  | Direction Issue : Review Petition allowed and Civil Appeal dismissed.  |  Bench : 2 Judges

Summary: Englishਪੰਜਾਬੀ - PunjabiDisclaimer 
						Judgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. 
						Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
						 
						 Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. 
						 
						Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. 
						The translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
						If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments.Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.LEHNA SINGH (D) BY LRS.versusGURNAM SINGH (D) BY LRS. & ORS.-[2024] 6 S.C.R. 3902024 INSC 429Coram : VIKRAM NATH*, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRAIssue for Consideration Issue arose whether the questions of law are not required to be framed in second appeal before Punjab and Haryana High Court whose jurisdiction in second appeal is circumscribed by provision of s.41 of the Punjab Act. Headnotes† Code of Civil s.100 – Punjab Courts Act, 1918 – s. 41 – Second appeal – Framing of a substantial question of law for entertaining the second appeal – Requirement – On facts, suit for perpetual injunction by the plaintiff against the defendant that he and his brother wereDecision Date :16-05-2024| Case No :REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1025/2019| Direction Issue :Review Petition allowed and Civil Appeal dismissed.|  Bench :2 Judges