For example in the claims that Lobachevsky was in correspondence with Gauss (Gauss appreciated Lobachevsky's works very highly but had no personal correspondence with him), that Gauss studied Russian to read Lobachevsky's Russian papers as claimed for example in (actually, Gauss had studied Russian before he had even heard of Lobachevsky), and that Gauss was a "good propagandist" of Lobachevsky's works in Germany (Gauss never commented publicly on Lobachevsky's work) are shown to be false.
Halimbawa sa pag-angkin na Lobachevsky ay sa correspondence sa gauss (gauss appreciated Lobachevsky's gumagana masyadong mataas na ngunit hindi nagkaroon ng personal na pagsusulatan sa kanya), na gauss-aral ng Russian sa read Lobachevsky's Russian papeles na inaangkin para sa mga halimbawa sa (talagang, gauss had-aral ng Russian bago niya kahit na narinig ng Lobachevsky), at na gauss ay isang "mabuting tagapagpalaganap" ng Lobachevsky's gumagana sa Alemanya (gauss hindi commented publiko sa Lobachevsky ng trabaho) ay ipinapakita na hindi totoo.