But in the process of phasing out nuclear, Scotland is now considering a new coal-fired power plant to replace the power supply. Which has me pondering, if I had to choose among two evils, which would be worse: billions in subsidies for nuclear or billions in subsidies for coal? Which would you choose?
Ngunit nasa proseso ng phase out nuclear, Scotland ay isinasaalang-alang na ngayon ng isang bagong kapangyarihan halaman ng karbon-fired upang palitan ang power supply. Na ako pondering, kung mayroon kong piliin sa dalawa evils, na magiging mas masama: bilyun-bilyong sa subsidies para sa nuclear o bilyun-bilyong sa subsidies para sa karbon? Alin pipiliin mo?