en: Every citizen of the Union shall, in the territory of a third country in which the Member State of which he or she is a national is not represented, be entitled to protection by the diplomatic or consular authorities of any Member State, on the same conditions as the nationals of that Member State.  
mt: Il-libertà tal-moviment u tar-residenza tista' tingħata, skond il-Kostituzzjoni, lil ċittadini ta' pajjiżi terzi li jkunu residenti legalment fit-territorju ta' Stat Membru.

en: Explanation  
mt: Spjegazzjoni

en: The right guaranteed by this Article is the right guaranteed by Article I-10 of the Constitution; cf. also the legal base in Article III-127.  
mt: Id-dritt garantit mill-paragrafu 1 huwa d-dritt garantit mill-Artikolu I-10(2)(a) tal-Kostituzzjoni (ara wkoll il-bażi ġuridika fl-Artikolu III-125; u s-sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tas-17 ta' Settembru 2002, C-413/99 Baumbast, [2002] ECR 709).

en: In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter(  
mt: 63

en: 69  
mt: 69

en: ), it applies under the conditions defined in these Articles.  
mt: Protezzjoni diplomatika u konsulari

en: TITLE VI  
mt: Kull cittadin ta' l-Unjoni jkun intitolat, fit-territorju ta' pajjiż terz li fih l-Istat Membru li tiegħu jkun ċittadin ma jkunx rappreżentat, li jgawdi mill-protezzjoni mill-awtoritajiet diplomatiċi jew konsulari ta' kull Stat Membru, bl-istess kondizzjonijiet taċ-ċittadini ta' dak l-Istat Membru.

en: JUSTICE  
mt: Spjegazzjoni

en: 70  
mt: 70

en: )  
mt: )

en: Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial  
mt: Dritt għal rimedju effettiv u għal proċess imparzjali

en: Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.  
mt: Kull persuna li d-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tagħha garantiti mid-dritt ta' l-Unjoni jiġu vjolati għandha d-dritt għal rimedju effettiv quddiem qorti skond il-kondizzjonijiet stabbiliti f'dan l-Artikolu.

en: Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.  
mt: Kull persuna għandha d-dritt għal smigħ ġust u pubbliku fi żmien raġjonevoli minn qorti indipendenti u imparzjali stabbilita minn qabel bil-liġi.

en: Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented.  
mt: Kull persuna għandu jkollha l-possibilità li tieħu parir, ikollha difiża u tkun rappreżentata.

en: Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources insofar as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.  
mt: Għajnuna legali għandha tingħata lil dawk li ma jkollhomx mezzi biżżejjed, fil-każijiet fejn din l-għajnuna hija neċessarja sabiex jiġi żgurat aċċess effettiv għall-ġustizzja.

en: Explanation  
mt: Spjegazzjoni

en: The first paragraph is based on Article 13 of the ECHR:  
mt: L-ewwel paragrafu huwa bbażat fuq l-Artikolu 13 tal-KEDB:

en: ‘ Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity. ’  
mt: “ Kull min ikollu miksura d-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tiegħu kontemplati f'din il-Konvenzjoni għandu jkollu rimedju effettiv quddiem awtorità nazzjonali għalkemm dak il-ksur ikun sar minn persuni li jkunu qed jaġixxu f'kariga uffiċjali ” .

en: However, in Union law the protection is more extensive since it guarantees the right to an effective remedy before a court.  
mt: Madankollu, fid-dritt ta' l-Unjoni l-protezzjoni hija aktar estiża billi tiggarantixxi d-dritt għal rimedju effettiv quddiem qorti.

en: The Court of Justice enshrined that right in its judgment of 15 May 1986 as a general principle of Union law (Case 222/84 Johnston [1986] ECR 1651; see also judgment of 15 October 1987, Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097 and judgment of 3 December 1992, Case C-97/91 Borelli [1992] ECR I-6313).  
mt: Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja fis-sentenza tagħha tal-15 ta' Mejju 1986 irrikonoxxiet dak il-jedd bħala prinċipju ġenerali tad-dritt ta' l-Unjoni (fil-Każ 222/84 Johnston [1986] ECR 1651; ara wkoll is-sentenza tal-15 ta' Ottubru 1987, il-Każ 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097 u s-sentenza tat-3 ta' Diċembru 1992, il-Każ C-97/91 Borelli [1992] ECR I-6313).

en: According to the Court, that general principle of Union law also applies to the Member States when they are implementing Union law.  
mt: Skond il-Qorti, dak il-prinċipju ġenerali tad-dritt ta' l-Unjoni japplika wkoll għall-Istati Membri meta dawn ikunu qegħdin jimplimentaw id-dritt ta' l-Unjoni.

en: The inclusion of this precedent in the Charter has not been intended to change the system of judicial review laid down by the Treaties, and particularly the rules relating to admissibility for direct actions before the Court of Justice of the European Union.  
mt: L-inklużjoni ta' din il-każistika fil-Karta ma kinetx intiża sabiex tbiddel is-sistema tar-reviżjoni ġudizzjarja stabbilita mit-Trattati, u partikolarment ir-regoli dwar l-ammissibbiltà ta' rikorsi magħmula direttament quddiem il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea.

en: The European Convention has considered the Union's system of judicial review including the rules on admissibility, and confirmed them while amending them as to certain aspects, as reflected in Articles III-353 to III-381 of the Constitution, and in particular in Article III-365(4).  
mt: Il-Konvenzjoni Ewropea ikkunsidrat is-sistema ta' l-Unjoni tar-reviżjoni ġudizzjarja inklużi r-regoli dwar l-ammissibbiltà, u kkonfermatha waqt li emendatha fir-rigward ta' ċerti aspetti, kif ġie rifless fl-Artikoli III-353 sa III-381 tal-Kostituzzjoni, u b'mod partikolari fl-Artikolu III-365(4).

en: Article 47(  
mt: L-Artikolu 47(

en: 70  
mt: 71

en: ) applies to the institutions of the Union and of Member States when they are implementing Union law and does so for all rights guaranteed by Union law.  
mt: ) japplika għall-istituzzjonijiet ta' l-Unjoni, u ta' l-Istati Membri meta dawn ikunu qegħdin jimplimentaw id-dritt ta' l-Unjoni u dan jagħmlu fir-rigward tad-drittijiet kollha li huma garantiti mid-dritt ta' l-Unjoni.

en: The second paragraph corresponds to Article 6(1) of the ECHR which reads as follows:  
mt: It-tieni paragrafu jikkorrispondi għall-Artikolu 6(1) tal-KEDB li jinqara kif ġej:

en: ‘ In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.  
mt: “ Fid-deċiżjoni tad-drittijiet ċivili u ta' l-obbligi tiegħu jew ta' xi akkuża kriminali kontra tiegħu, kulħadd huwa ntitolat għal smigħ imparzjali u pubbliku fi żmien raġonevoli minn tribunal indipendenti u imparzjali mwaqqaf b'liġi.

en: Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. ’  
mt: Is-sentenza għandha tingħata pubblikament iżda l-istampa u l-pubbliku jistgħu jiġu esklużi mill-proċeduri kollha jew minn parti minnhom fl-interess tal-morali, ta' l-ordni pubbliku jew tas-sigurtà nazzjonali f'soċjetà demokratika, meta l-interessi tal-minuri jew il-protezzjoni tal-ħajja privata tal-partijiet hekk teħtieġ, jew safejn ikun rigorożament meħtieġ fil-fehma tal-qorti f'ċirkostanzi speċjali meta l-pubbliċità tista' tippreġudika l-interessi tal-ġustizzja ” .