# Unwitting cult leaders

An insight that I’d kind of already had, but which [this interview with Michael Taft](https://teachingmeditation.buzzsprout.com/1660645/7620904-michael-taft-how-not-to-become-guru) (relevant section starts at about 32 minutes) helped crystallize:

We tend to think of a “cult leader” as someone who *intentionally* sets out to create a cult. But most cult-like things probably *don’t* form like that. A lot of people feel a strong innate *desire* to be in a cult.

In the podcast, Taft suggests that it’s rooted in an infant’s need to attach to a caregiver, and to treat them as a fully dependable authority to fix all problems – a desire which doesn’t necessarily ever go fully away. Once someone becomes a teacher of some sort, even if they had absolutely no desire to create a cult, they will regardless attract people who *want* to be their cultists.

There are people who want to find a fully dependable authority figure to look up to, and are just looking for someone who feels like a good fit for the role. (I should note that I have definitely not been immune to feeling this yearning myself.) To avoid having cultists, “not intending to create a cult” [isn’t enough](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yEjaj7PWacno5EvWa/every-cause-wants-to-be-a-cult); you have to *actively fight against* people’s tendency to idealize you, by doing things that force them to confront the fact that you are actually just a human.

I’m reminded of something I recall Eliezer Yudkowsky once saying: “if you tell your doting followers not to form a cult, they will go around saying ‘We Must Not Form A Cult, Great Leader Mundo Said So’.”

Once people *do* start pulling you towards a cult leader role, it’s going to feel very appealing. What it feels like from the inside is “all of these people like me and say that I’ve done a lot of good for them, so clearly I must be doing things right, and since they also listen to me, I can use my position to help them out even more”.

It’s not just that the cultists are getting “brainwashed” by their leader; it’s also that the leader is getting brainwashed *by their cultists* to take the role that they want the leader to take. Cults are said to use “love bombing” to attract new recruits, but in at least some cases, it probably also happens that the cult *leader* is getting love bombed by their followers.

And the temptation to take on that role is powerful not only because it feels nice personally, but also because it *does* allow you to use your power for good. One definition for a hypnotic trance that I’ve heard is that it’s a state in which [a person’s critical faculty is bypassed](https://www.selfhypnosis.com/the-conscious-critical-faculty/), which allows the hypnotist to directly make changes in the mind of the person being hypnotized. And you *can* do a lot of good that way, such as by implanting suggestions that help people overcome their addictions or phobias. 

Being someone’s cultist (in this sense) is kind of like them having you in a hypnotic trance. It *is* possible for to use that power in a way that’s beneficial, because the critical faculty that might normally reject or modulate the leader’s suggestions gets partially bypassed.

But that same power makes it extremely dangerous, since people are not going to think critically about what you say, and may take your words far more literally than you intended, when you didn’t think of adding the obvious-to-you caveats about how it *shouldn’t* be interpreted.

I’ve been feeling this myself. I’ve written various things that people like. And I’ve been having a definite sense of some of my social environment trying to tug me more towards a role as a teacher and as an authority, getting the sense that some people are idealizing me. (And again, yes, there have been several times when I’ve had the cult follower energy myself, too – both towards online writers and in some of my romantic relationships.)

I’m reminded here again of Valentine’s essay on the “[Intelligent Social Web](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/AqbWna2S85pFTsHH4/the-intelligent-social-web)” and of how people tend to take the kinds of roles that their social environment recognizes and rewards… and how people try to tug *others* into the kinds of roles that they can recognize and know how to interact with, and the collective power of everyone doing this causes the social web as a whole to try to pull people into recognizable roles – including the role of “charismatic leader”. 

Here we come back to Taft’s suggestion that many people have an instinctive desire to get someone into a role that they recognize as a “trustworthy caretaker” one, because the “child” role is one that feels very easy to play – just surrender your judgment to the other person and do everything the way (you think that) they want you to.

And I’m also reminded of [siderea’s analysis of kingship in Watership Down](http://siderea.livejournal.com/1212664.html), and of how Hazel never thought of himself as a leader originally in the novel, until the characters around him started treating him as one – and how that might *not* be as good of a deal as our society makes “kingship” sound like:

> *If you demonstrate a concern for the wellbeing of the people in your people, they will start seeing their wellbeing as your concern. Start taking responsibility for how things go in a group, and people will start seeing you as responsible for how things go in a group.*
> 
> *This, right here, is what causes many people to back away from Kingship. Which is their right, of course. It’s totally legitimate to look at that deal and say, “Oh, *hell* no.”*
> 
> *Our society tells us that being King is awesome and everyone – well, everyone normal – wants to be one. “Every body wants to rule the world.” No, actually, they don’t. My experience tells me that *most* people are very reluctant to step into the job of King, and this consequence of the role is a primary reason why.*

I don’t know, but it strikes me at least *plausible* that prospective leaders themselves getting partially deluded about what it is that they are up for, is what enables them to actually step into the role rather than just saying “oh *hell* no”.