# Career prospects for physics majors

Physics is attractive to many highly intellectually capable students, because

*   Physical theories represent pinnacles of human achievement
*   It's intellectually stimulating 
*   It has a reputation for being a subject that smart people do

See the comments on the post [What attracts smart and curious young people to physics?](/lw/jur/what_attracts_smart_and_curious_young_people_to/)

But what of career prospects?

In an answer to the Quora question [What is it like to major in physics?](http://www.quora.com/What-is-it-like-to-major-in-physics) PhD physicist Joshua Parks wrote:

> It may not be too crazy to claim that as far as career options go, physics majors may be much more like English or other humanities majors (who often make career choices unrelated to their study) than their science and engineering counterparts.

At Physics Forums, ParticleGrl [wrote](http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=569941)

> If you are an engineer, you can almost certainly get a job in a technical field right out of college. Physics majors, on the other hand, end up all over the place (insurance, finance, teaching high school, programming, etc). 

We discuss some career paths for physics majors below.

**Summary**
-----------

*   The primary reason to major in physics (outside of intrinsic interest) is as a prerequisite to a physics PhD or as background for teaching high school physics.
*   Over 50% of those who get PhDs in physics don't become physicists, often because of difficulty finding jobs.
*   Physics majors are able to get jobs in other quantitative fields, but often with more difficulty than they would had they majored in those fields.

**The popularity of physics as a major**
----------------------------------------

The fraction of students who major in physics is small. [What's It Worth?: The Economic Value of College Majors](http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf?utm_source=Brilliant%3A+The+New+Science+of+Smart+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3701f6787c-Brilliant_Report_16_1_2012&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9c734401c1-3701f6787c-300646505) by the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce (pg. 162) reports that there are 936k people with Bachelor's degrees in physical sciences, but only 91k with degrees in physics. Assuming that there are 50 years worth of people with Bachelor's degrees in the United States, we get figures of about 20k physical sciences majors per year and 2k physics majors per year. This is in consonance with a [report](http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_313.asp) of the National Center for Educational Statistics, which gives a figure of 20k physical science majors who graduated in 2005. There are about 1.3 million college majors a year, so on the order of 0.2% of college graduates majored in physics.

The proportion increases significantly if one considers the population of highly intellectually capable students. For example, [about 2%](http://www.quora.com/Stanford-University/What-are-the-most-popular-majors-at-Stanford) of Stanford undergraduates major in physics. The proportion will be still higher if one considers the population of Stanford's most intellectually capable students. 

**Physics**

The Bureau of Labor Statistics [reports](http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes192012.htm) that 17k people work as physicists, so about 20% of physics majors. 

Majoring in physics is a step toward becoming a physicist, but it's usually not sufficient. In an anonymous answer to the Quora quest [What is it like to major in physics?](http://www.quora.com/What-is-it-like-to-major-in-physics), the answerer reports

> There are no jobs in physics as the BS level. You need a PhD to do work related to physics, and even work at the Masters level is not that great (so I've heard).

This may not literally be true: the American Physical Society [reports](http://www.aps.org/careers/statistics/bsprivatesec.cfm) that 5% of physics majors who enter the workforce right after college work in physics or astronomy. But broadly, a physics PhD seems to be a prerequisite to becoming a physicist.

Graduate school is a common path for physics majors. [What's It Worth?](http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf?utm_source=Brilliant%3A+The+New+Science+of+Smart+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3701f6787c-Brilliant_Report_16_1_2012&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9c734401c1-3701f6787c-300646505) reports (pg. 27) that 67% of physics majors go on to earn a graduate degree (without giving a breakdown of what kinds of graduate degrees they get). The American Institute of Physics [reports](http://www.aip.org/sites/default/files/statistics/graduate/trendsphds-p-12.2.pdf) that there are about 900 US citizens who earn physics PhDs a year, suggesting that a large fraction (30+%) of the ~2k physics majors who graduate in a given year go on to earn PhDs in physics. 

The default career path for a PhD physicist is academia. We give some general considerations on our page on [Academia as a career option](http://info.cognitomentoring.org/wiki/Academia_as_a_career_option). There seems to be a general consensus that the job market in physics academia is extremely competitive. [Don't Become a Scientist!](http://wuphys.wustl.edu/~katz/scientist.html) by Jonathan Katz describes the scarcity of jobs relative to PhDs and its implications. Physicist rknop [writes](http://scientopia.org/blogs/galacticinteractions/2010/08/19/what-to-do-about-overproduction-of-phds/)

> [](http://scientopia.org/blogs/galacticinteractions/2010/08/19/what-to-do-about-overproduction-of-phds/)My own field is physics, and the problem of physicists being trained for and expected to get tenure-track faculty positions, without enough of these positions being out there, has been a sore topic for two decades (at least). \[...\] There is absolutely no guarantee that the PhD will allow them to spend the rest of their lives in physics research. 

Putting the number of physicists together with the number of physics PhDs, it appears as though roughly 50% of physics PhDs are physicists (whether in academia or industry). 

Success in physics seems to be driven in large part by intelligence, so exceptionally intelligent people may have an easy time getting a job, but they have to be sufficiently intelligent to stand out amongst a population that's already strongly selected for intelligence.

**Computer programming / software engineering**
-----------------------------------------------

[What's It Worth?](http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf?utm_source=Brilliant%3A+The+New+Science+of+Smart+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3701f6787c-Brilliant_Report_16_1_2012&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9c734401c1-3701f6787c-300646505) (pg. 165) reports that 19% of physics majors end up in "computer services." This is vague, but it seems reasonable to guess that it's mostly software engineering. Answers to the Quora question [Why are there so many physics majors in software engineering?](http://www.quora.com/Software-Engineering/Why-are-there-so-many-physics-majors-in-software-engineering) give some reasons for this.

Physics majors' coursework and research can involve computer programming, but this tends to be limited. Broadly, if one wants to be a software engineer as a physics major, one has to minor in or double major in computer science, or spend a significant amount of time programming on one's own. In general, one can get a job as a software engineer without a computer science degree, so majoring in physics exclusively doesn't bar one from the career path, but it also seems strictly inferior to majoring in computer science from a professional point of view, for future software engineers.

In an answer to [Can a physics major get hired as a software engineer?](http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=519072) at Physics Forums, fss writes

> You will start out at a disadvantage compared to computer science people who have demonstrated programming ability, and it will be up to you to decide how best to show that you can bring something to the table that would make up for this deficiency (real or perceived). 

**Engineering**
---------------

The American Physical Society [reports](http://www.aps.org/careers/statistics/bsprivatesec.cfm) that 32% of physics majors who enter the workforce directly go into engineering. [What's It Worth?](http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf?utm_source=Brilliant%3A+The+New+Science+of+Smart+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3701f6787c-Brilliant_Report_16_1_2012&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9c734401c1-3701f6787c-300646505) (pg. 165) reports that 17% of physics majors are engineers.

The answers to [Can a Physics major get a job as an engineer?](http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=639143) and [Engineering Job with a Physics Degree](http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=620362) at Physics Forum suggest that physics majors can get jobs as engineers, but that they're at a disadvantage relative to engineering majors, and that those who plan to be engineers should major in engineering.

Physics majors are sometimes able to go to engineering graduate school, for example, [Dan Recht](http://www.quora.com/College-and-University-Majors/How-easy-is-it-for-a-physics-major-to-go-to-engineering-graduate-school).

**High school teaching**
------------------------

The Physics Teacher Education Coalition [reports](http://www.phystec.org/webdocs/shortage.cfm) that there are 27k high school physics teachers, 35% of whom have degrees in physics or physics education, suggesting that up to 10% of physics majors become high school physics teachers. We have not yet done a writeup on high school teaching as a career, but hope to do so.

Earnings
--------

*   Payscale [reports](http://www.payscale.com/college-salary-report-2014/majors-that-pay-you-back) that median midcareer salary for physics majors is $101k/year, which ranks 9th in median midcareer salary amongst majors, after computer science, actuarial mathematics, and some engineering specialties. 
*   The median _starting_ salary for physics majors of $53k/year is lower than the median starting salary for engineers, which is more like $60k-$65k/year. 
*   [What's It Worth?](http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf?utm_source=Brilliant%3A+The+New+Science+of+Smart+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3701f6787c-Brilliant_Report_16_1_2012&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9c734401c1-3701f6787c-300646505) (pgs. 23-24) reports that the 25th percentile of physics majors' income is $38k/year, compared with $85k/year for engineering specialties.

The relatively low median starting salary and 25th percentile salary may be dragged down substantially by the fact that physics majors attend graduate school and do postdocs with higher frequency than engineering majors do, during which they have low earnings. 

After controlling for years of education and intelligence, physics majors make less than engineers, even mid-career. As above, physics majors complete PhDs more frequently than engineering majors do, and [one source](http://www.statisticbrain.com/iq-estimates-by-intended-college-major/) reports that physics majors' average SAT scores are about 100 points higher than engineering and computer science majors' on a 1600 point scale (equating to about 0.5 SD in IQ). So it's plausible that they make less money than their counterparts of similar intelligence who majored in engineering or computer science. This doesn't necessarily mean that they _couldn't_ get jobs where they made more money – it could be that they prefer lower paying academic jobs over higher paying jobs outside of physics.

[_Cross-posted from the Cognito Mentoring blog_](http://cognitomentoring.org/blog/career-prospects-for-physics-majors/)