# Lsusr's Rationality Dojo

> Why aren’t there dojos that teach rationality?
> 
> ―[*The Martial Art of Rationality*](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/teaxCFgtmCQ3E9fy8/the-martial-art-of-rationality) by Eliezer Yudkowsky

For the last 6 months, I've been running a dojo that teaches rationality.

Why
===

I was at an ACX meetup and met an acolyte who grew up in an evangelical Christian community. He had recently discovered the *Sequences* and was really excited about this whole Rationality thing. He was very confident in Yudkowsky's teachings.

I asked him a couple questions and he realized his beliefs were full of holes. He wondered how he could have understood so little. After all, he had read all of Yudkowsky's *Sequences*.

"I have read 100 books about chess," I said, "Surely I must be a grandmaster by now."

At that moment, he was enlightened.

The problem
-----------

The objective of rationality is to become right instead of wrong. Being wrong feels exactly like being right. We are not aware of our own biases. We are not aware of our own mistakes. We are not aware of the lies we tell ourselves. This is almost a tautology.

Other people are not tautologically blind to our mistakes in the same way. The simplest way to become less wrong is to have someone else point out your mistakes to you. Except this doesn't actually work. If I say "I'm right," and you say "you're wrong", then we get nowhere. The more we argue, the more frustrated we get.

The solution
------------

There is a better way. I call it **rhetorical aikido**. Rhetorical aikido is a Daoist form of Socratic dialogue. The simplest form of rhetorical aikido has three steps:

1.  You let someone confidently state a belief $A$ that you know is wrong.
2.  You let that same someone confidently state a belief $B$ that contradicts $A$.
3.  You let them notice that $A$ contradicts $B$.

Examples:  
\[I'm the guy in the dark green chair on your right.\]

Notice that this technique follows [Dale Carnegie's guidelines](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4865.How_to_Win_Friends_and_Influence_People). You smile. You agree. You show genuine interest in the other person. You don't say "You're wrong". You never even say your own beliefs (unless asked). There's nothing for the person to get angry at because you never attacked them. Instead of criticizing, you point out errors indirectly, via a joke. You cheer them on as they dig their own grave. After all, you're trying to lose too.

Perhaps more importantly, this technique makes [password-guessing](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NMoLJuDJEms7Ku9XS/guessing-the-teacher-s-password) impossible. You're playing the bastard offspring of chess + Calvinball. There is no password to guess.

The right conditions
====================

Rhetorical aikido is useful for diffusing conflicts at family gatherings and the like. If you want to go even further and deprogram people, it's best to have the following conditions:

*   Two-person **di**alogue. Arbitrarily large groups can watch, but exactly two must be allowed to speak.
*   Curiosity. Both people must be genuinely interested in the subject. I am interested in so many different subjects that I mostly let the other person pick what we talk about.
*   Earnestness. Both people must be genuinely interested in getting at the truth. I start with earnest friends. When I put a camera in front of them, they turn into paragons of rationalist virtue.

This whole thing started with off-the-record conversations with my friend Justin. It took a year of iterations to figure out what worked best. Conversations turned into unpublished audio recordings turned into unpublished video recordings turned into structured video dialogues. Eventually, after recording a video, a different friend asked me what I thought about rationality dojos.

"Welcome to Lsusr's rationality dojo," I replied, "Today is not your first day."

The right topics
----------------

I've had great conversations about economics, business, racism, homophobia, IQ, war, history, psychology, rationality, ethics, Buddhism, meditation, social skills, Israel, Hamas, antimemetics, and the Matrix.

Therapy and self-help are bad topics because they attract solipsists who talk about their problems instead of solving their problems.

The worst topics are "some people argue" and "someone else is wrong". Simulacra are a distraction from base reality. You must come to a consensus about base reality before discussing simulacra.