# Active Recall and Spaced Repetition are Different Things

*Epistemic status: splitting hairs. Originally published as a* [*shortform*](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/iFJB5g2hczqnN7EhM/saul-munn-s-shortform?commentId=uSFNwtfgRircvGrT8)*; thanks* [*@Arjun Panickssery*](https://www.lesswrong.com/users/arjun-panickssery?mention=user) *for telling me to publish this as a full post.*

There’s been a lot of recent work on memory. This is great, but popular communication of that progress consistently mixes up active recall and spaced repetition. That consistently bugged me — hence this piece.

If you already have a good understanding of active recall and spaced repetition, skim sections I and II, then skip to section III.

Note: this piece doesn’t meticulously cite sources, and will probably be slightly out of date in a few years. I link to some great posts that have far more technical substance at the end, if you’re interested in learning more & actually reading the literature.

I. Active Recall
================

When you want to learn some new topic, or review something you’ve previously learned, you have different strategies at your disposal. Some examples:

*   Watch a YouTube video on the topic.
*   Do practice problems.
*   Review notes you’d previously taken.
*   Try to explain the topic to a friend.
*   etc

Some of these boil down to “stuff the information into your head” (YouTube video, reviewing notes) and others boil down to “do stuff that requires you to use/remember the information” (doing practice problems, explaining to a friend). Broadly speaking, the second category — doing stuff that requires you to actively recall the information — is *way, way* more effective.

That’s called “active recall.”

II. (Efficiently) Spaced Repetition
===================================

After you learn something, you’re likely to forget it pretty quickly:

![](https://res.cloudinary.com/lesswrong-2-0/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/mirroredImages/uSFNwtfgRircvGrT8/yt1nrezubza4dwpk0ypf)

Fortunately, reviewing the thing you learned pushes you back up to 100% retention, and this happens each time you “repeat” a review:

![](https://res.cloudinary.com/lesswrong-2-0/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/mirroredImages/uSFNwtfgRircvGrT8/zywzz7qi5vzhwyaulvwf)

That’s a lot better!

…but that’s also a lot of work. You have to review the thing you learned in intervals, which takes time/effort. So, how can you do the *least* the number of repetitions to keep your retention as *high* as possible? In other words — what should be the size of the intervals? Should you space them out every day? Every week? Should you change the size of the spaces between repetitions? How?

As it turns out, *efficiently* spacing out repetitions of reviews is a pretty well-studied problem. The answer is “*riiiight* before you’re about to forget it:”

![](https://res.cloudinary.com/lesswrong-2-0/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/mirroredImages/uSFNwtfgRircvGrT8/omy8o4hovso5muynzzia)

Generally speaking, you should do a review right before it crosses some threshold for retention. What that threshold actually is depends on some fiddly details, but the central idea remains the same: repeating a review *riiight* before you hit that threshold is the most efficient spacing possible.

This is called (efficiently) spaced repetition. Systems that use spaced repetitions — software, methods, etc — are called “spaced repetition systems” or “SRS.”

III. The difference
===================

Active recall and spaced repetition are independent strategies. One of them (active recall) is a *method for reviewing material*; the other (effective spaced repetition) is a *method for how to best time reviews*. You can use one, the other, or both:

![](https://res.cloudinary.com/lesswrong-2-0/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/mirroredImages/uSFNwtfgRircvGrT8/t6obru5iuuaz3fclkfky)

Examples of their independence:

*   You could listen to a lecture on a topic once now, and again a year from now (not active recall, very inefficiently spaced repetition)
*   You could watch YouTube videos on a topic in efficiently spaced intervals (not active recall, yes spaced repetition)
*   You could quiz yourself with flashcards once, then never again (yes active recall, no spaced repetition)
*   You could do flashcards on something in efficiently spaced intervals (both spaced repetition and active recall).

IV. Implications
================

Why does this matter?

Mostly, it doesn’t, and I’m just splitting hairs. But occasionally, it does matter — for instance, it's sometimes prohibitively difficult to use spaced repetition and active recall, still quite possible to use just one of the two. In these cases, folks sometimes throw up their hands. But the right response is to do use the method that works nicely!

For example, you can do a bit of efficiently spaced repetition when learning people’s names, by saying their name aloud:

*   immediately after learning it (“hi, my name’s Alice” “nice to meet you, Alice!”)
*   partway through the conversation (“but i’m still not sure of the proposal. what do you think, Alice?”)
*   at the end of the conversation (“thanks for chatting, Alice!”)
*   that night (“who did I meet today? oh yeah, Alice!”)

…but it’s a lot more difficult to use *active recall* to remember people’s names. (The closest I’ve gotten is to try to *first* bring into my mind’s eye what their face looks like, *then* to try to remember their name.)

Another example in the opposite direction: learning your way around a city in a car. It’s really easy to do active recall: have Google Maps opened on your phone and ask yourself what the next direction is each time before you look down; guess what the next street is going to be before you get there; etc. But it’s much more difficult to efficiently space your reviews out, since  review timing ends up mostly in the hands of your travel schedule. (For more on the topic of deliberately using memory systems to quickly learn the geography of a new place, see [this post](https://controlaltbackspace.org/place/).)

* * *

As promised at the top, if you’re interested in learning more & actually reading the literature, I'd start with "[Spaced Repetition for Efficient Learning](https://gwern.net/spaced-repetition)" (gwern) and "[Augmenting Long-term Memory](https://augmentingcognition.com/ltm.html)" (Michael Nielson), then reading through the works they cite.