# Covid 10/28: An Unexpected Victory

The story of this week is what went down at the port of Los Angeles. The port had been brought to a standstill, because there was nowhere to put empty containers and trucks were sitting around with empty containers on them instead of moving freight, and the problem kept getting worse and worse. By taking a carefully planned boat ride, creating a finely crafted Tweetstorm designed to persuade, and getting the right people to assist, Ryan Peterson was able *within one day* to get the container stacking rule at the port changed from a limit of two to a limit of five, and get cargo moving again. It’s hard to tell exactly how much of a difference this will make, but from everything I’ve seen it will be a big difference. This is not only a huge story for its object level implications, it’s a story of how someone can make a difference, and how we were able to actually do something. 

Yet mainstream media is ignoring the story. Shout it from the rooftops! [I’ve split that story off into its own post.](https://thezvi.wordpress.com/2021/10/28/an-unexpected-victory-container-stacking-at-the-port-of-los-angeles/) If you have to choose between reading that one and reading this one, read that one, it’s far more important.

Meanwhile in the land of Covid-19, things continue as you might expect.  

Executive Summary
-----------------

1.  Ryan Peterson managed to get them to change the container stacking rules at the port of Los Angeles, which had otherwise reached a standstill, potentially saving Christmas and/or the economy. [This got its own post.](https://thezvi.wordpress.com/2021/10/28/an-unexpected-victory-container-stacking-at-the-port-of-los-angeles/)
2.  Covid-19 conditions continue to slowly improve.
3.  Child vaccinations for age 5-11 on track for November.

Let’s run the numbers.

The Numbers
-----------

Predictions
-----------

Prediction from last week: 410k cases (-13%) and 9,600 deaths (-10%).

Results: 431k cases (-9%) and 9,506 deaths (-11%).

Prediction for next week: 400k cases (-9%) and 8,600 deaths (-10%).

Slightly disappointing case counts, very slightly good news on deaths. Trends continue and I see no reason for that to change in the next few weeks. Children getting vaccinated soon should help somewhat as well, although that will take a while.

Deaths
------

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/d65e1836fd8b6753ced3cfaa5aa9f417259f22b7d194d213.png)

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/a6352f1c2886a430c521ba8d2860f0198aa31f32d0f6ce15.png)

Nothing here should be surprising, given what we saw in cases several weeks ago, and it lined up with the predicted outcome.

Cases
-----

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/5a35338a2c1870127342068e5ac1606d315da5db7156c53a.png)

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/c3335e50aa379a47962b9ca5880f065446a082c1d30f46b5.png)

We see clear improvement continuing in all regions, with an especially good number coming out of the Northeast. It’s a disappointing number since we had reason to expect better, but there’s nothing here that causes me to worry.

[Polimath is back with another state by state analysis of cases and deaths](https://polimath.substack.com/p/every-states-covid-numbers-in-context-9e6). If you want more detailed graphs that look into different states, it’s a great place to look. 

Vaccinations 
-------------

The FDA committee has now approved Pfizer for 5-11 year-olds, so we are on pace to start those vaccinations soon. 

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/32d2a3030ba3614a91ec44e261a3bd8dbf6edaf227a73180.png)

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/9703085f322621306ea3d10f5e4661c089f1bae5d2cb65d6.png)

It no longer seems necessary to track this every week, so I’ll probably start spacing out how often I pay attention to it. 

Vaccine Effectiveness
---------------------

The core problem with booster shots continues to be that the following facts are true:

1.  The vaccines are safe and effective.
2.  Booster shots make them more effective.
3.  Authorities think they need to tell people considering getting vaccinated that it will be sufficient protection.
4.  (Authorities then tell those same people to keep taking all their other precautions, and hope people don’t notice the contradiction until too late.)
5.  If you tell people #2 Proper Authorities assume they are going to question #3, because, I mean, well, um.
6.  [So what to do?](https://twitter.com/JakeAnbinder/status/1453009996959072270/photo/1)

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCog19gXIA0z7zs?format=jpg&name=large)

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCog19gWEAAhT7e?format=png&name=large)

Perhaps what they should say is, the truth? There’s no actual contradiction here, unless you are presenting the world in a black and white ‘protected’ versus ‘unprotected,’ immune versus not immune (see: Gupta on Rogan) because you assume people can’t handle anything else.  

This pattern has been a problem for a while. Authority needs us to to continuously believe:

1.  We are in terrible danger. Unsafe!
2.  The thing they say to do will make us safe.
3.  But not safe enough that we are not in terrible danger anyway.
4.  So there can be a next thing.
5.  And so no one stops doing the other things.

This is a *fundamentally nonsensical* story. If you think in terms of quantified risks and probabilities, it’s totally fine to say (reasonable guesses but not strongly endorsed numbers) ‘the vaccine works about 85% after a while, also boosters work better and make that 99%, also masks help up to 75% depending on fit, and social distancing helps proportional to how much you do it, opening windows and going outdoors help proportionally, staying at a healthy weight cuts your risk in half or better, and so on. But if all you can do is say ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ then there’s a necessary *superposition* of quantum unsafeness that shifts depending on what you’re talking about at the moment and what authority wants you to do.

This is also true in other areas, and has nothing to do with whether the things one is told to do are worth doing. If one is told to wear a seatbelt, that needs to make one ‘safe’ while thinking about whether to wear a seatbelt, but not when thinking about whether to buy an airbag, or whether to obey the speed limit, or to avoid tailgating, or not drink and drive, or anything else. And of course, the fact that cars are still inherently unsafe at the end of all that (although nothing like how unsafe they used to be) isn’t mentioned, because authority doesn’t want you to stop driving. Now think about the messaging around sexual activity. Same thing.

This means (along with other similar problems) that authority is prevented from offering a coherent world model that lasts longer than a few sentences. A simple metaphorical concept handle they can do, more than that would expose incoherence. When someone like Rogan last week points it out, the response is remarkably close to a robotic “file not found.”

I probably should post a clean version of this as a stand-alone post, and link to it in the future.

Vaccine Mandates
----------------

EDIT: Removing this section, as it was pointed out it was fishy and looking further into the thread it was likely that the source was making it up. Should have investigated further, my apologies. 

NPIs Including Mask and Testing Mandates 
-----------------------------------------

[We are finally doing at least some prioritization of rapid testing](https://twitter.com/RickByersLab/status/1452837469641224193), my guess is this is because of how schools are forcing massive testing on us. Better late than never.

For example, did you know that soon, [you may be able to buy one test instead of being forced by rule to buy a pack of two](https://twitter.com/wwwojtekk/status/1453038597783818240)? Progress!

 Meanwhile, in Permanent Midnight watch, [the New York Times has an advocate for permanent masking](https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/1453410120797405184) who strongly disagrees with Robin here.

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/122a8f3681b7d8740195839753f2d2a8fbf7159a67769bf3.png)

Think of the Children
---------------------

Mandating children get vaccinated, the same way we mandate other childhood vaccinations? [Well, there’s a little problem](https://twitter.com/MonicaGandhi9/status/1453401459991592968). 

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/52b60ad4fe5024ae01daaccf4582071222038bc6780aae44.png)

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/0a1d016f5be4819ee5644c4a8a86ac40a6325c47d4c00c07.png)

The adult side of things doesn’t make much sense but ignore that for now and focus on the children. They’re going to *mandate* vaccination, and then *force them to wear masks all day anyway.* So they’ll be 5-11 years old, fully vaccinated, safe as houses from a Covid-19 perspective, and then forced to come to a building where they’re forced to wear a mask, all day, five days a week. 

There is *zero* basis in physical reality for such a requirement. This is permanent midnight, a request that children live in a world without faces or ease of breathing, forever. And there’s a chance it will work. Even a LessWrong commenter of mine explicitly endorsed the idea that asks were worth having in school to prevent *other diseases,* and not letting kids breathe fully normally or see or show faces should be normalized permanently. 

Any organization, such as the CDC, that would make such a recommendation has declared which side they are on, and it isn’t ours. There is a war.

[About this next thing: It’s real.](https://slate.com/human-interest/2021/10/trust-broken-parenting-advice-care-feeding.html) I’m going to quote in full so no one needs to click:

> My daughter, 11, has been wonderful throughout the pandemic. She social distances at all times, we never have to remind her to put her masks on, and we found a fully virtual scholastic program so she can avoid the significant risks of large crowds in the public schools.
> 
> A few weeks ago, however, her other parent and I had an obligation that we both had to be present for (we are both vaccinated, it was socially distanced, and we were wearing masks). Usually one of us would stay home with her, but because of her maturity level and the short time we would be gone, we assumed we could trust her on her own.
> 
> When we arrived home, we found her with a friend of hers who lives about a block away. She has visited on occasion throughout the pandemic but they know the rules. They are to stay outside and on opposite ends of the driveway or patio. The patio only offers about 5 feet of distance, but we decided that should be enough as long as they stay outside and keep their masks on.
> 
> Anyway, when we arrived home on this particular day, both her and her friend were in the living room, sitting on the same couch, not wearing masks, not socially distanced, and each putting their hands into the same bowl of chips. Why she would take this kind of risk, I still don’t understand.
> 
> I immediately told her friend that she had to go home and to please inform her mother to call me at her earliest convenience. I then expressed my disappointment with my daughter and informed her how dangerous what she did was. I reminded her about the delta variant and how it’s caused so many children her age to end up in the ICU. I told her that she only has to wait a few more months until she’s eligible for the vaccine, and this isn’t the time to become complacent.
> 
> We took all the necessary steps to remain safe. She immediately quarantined in her bedroom for the suggested two weeks. I cleaned the house thoroughly and opened multiple windows to circulate the air. Luckily, we all came out of this debacle safely.
> 
> I still don’t feel I can trust her, though. I understand it’s normal for her to make mistakes, but this wasn’t forgetting to turn a light off or close the refrigerator. She put her life at risk. How do we start building the trust back?

Here was the response:

**Dear Trust Issues,**

> You can’t expect adult maturity from a child. If your daughter has been cautious and otherwise “wonderful” over the past 18 months, and this is her first time violating your household rules around COVID protocol, I’d encourage you to extend her a bit of grace. A year and a half is a long time for an 11-year-old to go without hanging out with friends. It’s also a long time to expect them to remain vigilant around a threat that seems to be lessening for the adults around them (as vaccination rates continue to rise and the world reopens). Her age group is among the last for whom vaccination isn’t an option, and it’s challenging for kids to watch the trusted authorities in their lives relax their own protocols around socializing, while they’re still being kept away from the people and things they care about.
> 
> Your daughter had a temporary lapse in judgment, which is to be expected for a child who hasn’t even reached adolescence yet. It sounds like you’ve sufficiently reprimanded her for inviting an unmasked friend into the house when you weren’t home. Aside from thinking twice before leaving her unsupervised again anytime soon, there shouldn’t be many additional measures you need to take to reestablish trust.

The good news is that this is ‘to be expected’ based on her young age, so further ‘punishment’ for this is not recommended, but it’s worth noticing that *this entire situation is completely crazy.* And look at what it is costing us. Permanent damage to this family seems likely here based on how the mother is reacting, and for what? For the crime of wanting to hang out with a friend and act like a human being. This has been going on for *almost two years.*

There’s the note that ‘with the vaccine close now is not the time to become complacent’ but what about after the vaccine? Will *that* be the time to become complacent? Or will such folks change essentially nothing, and continue to destroy childhood?

Well, did you hear about [the horrible latest trend among our kids](https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2021/10/18/kids-playing-squid-game/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F3514e8c%2F61757f579d2fda9d4121ca8d%2F60184c8aade4e27658480f7e%2F15%2F72%2F61757f579d2fda9d4121ca8d) (WaPo)? That they’re playing (moderate spoiler alert: Squid Game on Netflix, which I highly recommend) *actual traditional childhood games*?

> But some young [Hwang Dong-hyuk](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1375363/) fans seem to have missed the memo that “Squid Game” is not for them. The games on the show — all based on classic playground games from South Korea, like tug of war and red light, green light — are popping up on real-life playgrounds, distressing parents, educators and development experts, many of whom are wondering how the heck these kids heard about the show in the first place.

Red Light, Green Light. How the hell did our kids find out about this horrible new game called Red Light, Green Light? That deadly, dangerous game where *you have to alternate running and standing still?* Oh no. I played it in gym class as a child, do I need therapy? I also think I may have played Tug of War. I’m sure this is all greatly distressing to parents, educators and development experts. Talk to your kids before they start playing children’s games with each other, and maybe scrape a knee or have someone win while someone else loses or develop skills, or even worse have fun or learn something or bond with other children.

Then the author goes on to express horror that children might play a number of other games.

Yes, I do realize that the titular Squid Game itself is more violent and less ‘friendly’ than those other games, on par with rugby or football maybe, and that in some cases children are punching the loser afterwards so there will be stakes, perhaps because we’ve trained them that the agony of defeat is not a thing and it is therefore insufficient, requiring the agony of being punched. 

If you’re wondering if childhood and life itself are the enemy these people want to destroy, you have your answer.

In Other News
-------------

[This FiveThirtyEight list of basic information](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/covid-19-updates/) about Covid-19 seems correct as far as that goes, but also seems designed not to be that useful in terms of what to actually do with one’s life. 

[It’s not only health.](https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-dont-trust-their-congressional-maps-to-be-drawn-fairly-can-anything-change-that/) Have you tried… drawing fair congressional districts?

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/24b36049b05f1dea45f31445afaadba11b24bb3b0086ee77.png)

Americans not trusting the maps to be drawn fairly is *good.* It is a *feature.* Because they’re not fair, at all, they’re completely partisan. It would be good if they were not partisan, but the goal there isn’t to *restore faith that the process is fair,,* it’s *to have a fair process.* Everything is like this.

I’m not saying telling it straight is flawless. It’s true that Americans might be, shall we say, [bad at data analysis](https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1452261253590700047). 

![](https://39669.cdn.cke-cs.com/rQvD3VnunXZu34m86e5f/images/1c1b0219b079e28cceddf3c31582f279488fe8b9442f1329.png)

I still don’t see any alternative.

At the movies: I saw Dune, with minimal prior knowledge. People like it a lot. I do not understand. 

At home: I saw Squid Game. As noted above, it is highly recommended. Give it one full episode, then make your decision. There may be a Squid Game Sequence in the works, if I can find the time.