# COVID-19 response as XRisk intervention

_Thank you to the reviewers of this post: Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh, Robin Hanson, Anders Sandberg, Allison Duettmann, Andre Ornish, Jessica Taylor, and Blake Borgeson._

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-

Effective Altruists and rationalists are some of the only people in the world tracking existential risks (XRisks). And so it’s understandable that some of us would ask: “Is this a distraction?” Surely a crisis that ends many lives pales in comparison to crises that could end all of them.

However, this line of reasoning might make long-termists lose sight of a large opportunity: we can build XRisk prevention capacity \*through\* pandemic response efforts. Through fighting COVID-19, we can:

1\. Train ourselves

2\. Forge alliances

3\. Establish credibility

4\. Grow the global risk movement

5\. Create XRisk infrastructure

I’ll go through these by category.

**Training Ourselves**
======================

Now that we’re dealing with a live global catastrophe, there’s a chance to develop our skills and ability to coordinate for future global catastophes.

Here are some particularly relevant areas for skill growth:

• **Forecasting**: Create predictions of what might happen and be proven right or wrong.

• **Scenario-planning**: Run inside-view and outside-view simulations of your proposed COVID-19 intervention, act accordingly, and then improve your simulation abilities based on what actually happened.

• **Coordination**: Pandemic response efforts will often require that you collaborate with a wide variety of different actors, just like with other global risks.

• **Persuasive argumentation**: This skill can be built through convincing others that your project is worth supporting, or through influencing decision-makers.

• **Networking**: Navigate the complicated world of crisis-response to find others to aid and work with. Your project might require you to form connections with epidemiologists, with front-line responders, with public officials, with manufacturing plants, with fellow activists, and more.

• **Project management**: Develop the ability to set and meet deadlines at a moment when they really matter. Learn how to lead other people. Find and use the best tools for tracking tasks. Document and curate best practices (this can help other projects as well).

Perhaps the greatest opportunity here is for EAs and rationalists to improve their existing comparative advantage: **applied epistemology**. A live crisis affords epistemic growth opportunities unmatched by many other contexts. You need to work with spotty information and a rapidly unfolding situation. You must process signal from unreliable sources. You need to make decisions over uncertainty.

This is an opportunity to:

• Get rapid feedback on your decisions and predictions.

• Ground abstract models in concrete experiences.

• Understand how various canonical tools fare in a real-life situation (back-of-envelope calculations, conducting meta-analyses on RCTs, doing reference-class forecasting)

In other words, it’s an opportunity to practice rationality with immediate practical upside.

**Forging alliances**
=====================

Just about every sector of society is mobilizing itself to fight the pandemic right now. This gives EAs and rationalists an “in” to form alliances that can be useful for preventing future global risks. In just a few weeks of working on the crisis, my extended network has come to include crisis-response experts, epidemiologists, philanthropic foundations, lobbyists, manufacturing firms, and intelligence community members.

Let’s say you care about AI safety in particular. Some alliances you might forge now include:

• Policy experts at the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). OSTP is now [working with AI teams](https://www.rollcall.com/2020/03/16/artificial-intelligence-recruited-to-find-clues-about-covid-19/) at Microsoft and Google to analyze thousands of scientific papers on COVID-19. Many policy experts are stretched thin and would value additional research support. And in one notable case I’m unable to post publicly, EAs are already offering it!

• Researchers across various AI groups like Deepmind that are working on AI-based pandemic-response initiatives.

• Competent volunteers you meet through activist efforts. For instance, the best initiatives tend to have at least one solid project manager or ops person. Nearly every AI safety initiative benefits from having competent PMs and ops people, so this is a chance to source new talent.

**Establishing credibility**
============================

You know what’s useful for convincing people that you can competently address a global crisis? Competently addressing a global crisis. Useful resources are given to those who have demonstrated the sorts of prescience and intelligence that EAs and rationalists can demonstrate right now. Credit is already being assigned to rationalists and Silicon Valley people whose public material demonstrated better tracking of the virus than most established institutions. One attempt I like in this direction is [epidemicforecasting.org](http://epidemicforecasting.org/) from a team at the Future of Humanity Institute.

Notable demonstrations of competence on particular problems can often grant more general credibility. E.g., as with Nassim Taleb’s prediction of the 2008 financial crisis and Nate Silver’s predictions during the 2008 election.

Conversely, the EA and rationalists communities stand to \*lose\* credibility for inaction during the pandemic. The optics of tepidly responding to a global crisis after being the community that always ranted about global crises are...not good optics.

Of course we could also lose credibility by getting in the way of trained professionals during this one. But I believe EAs are pretty good at being helpful instead of hinderful.

**Growing the global risk movement**
====================================

The category of “global catastrophe” is no longer just an abstract idea. It’s a tangibly experienced reality. This ought ideally make it much easier to get more resources devoted to GCRs and XRisks in the future.

It is easy to imagine useful movement-building efforts. For example, now would be a good time to volunteer as marketing staff for Toby Ord’s new book, [The Precipice](https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/04/01/book-review-the-precipice/).

With this crisis, there may be the potential to cause larger culture-shifts. Historians speculate that the Enlightenment emerged from the Thirty Years War and that the Renaissance emerged from the Plague. This new plague offers an opportunity for shifting culture toward a new renaissance – ideally one which has long-termism as a central value.

Importantly, this may not happen automatically. It’s possible that we’ll miss the opportunity to draw the connection between COVID-19 and the broader category of global risk. It’s also very possible that the broader culture will fail to blame COVID-19 in part on short-termism, and miss out on valuing EA ideas around long-termism. Here, we must helpfully intervene.

Global institutions like the IMF and IBRD emerged from Breton Woods immediately after World War II. Toward the end of the pandemic, there is going to be a short window for policy proposals and new global institutions. Likewise, there will be a limited window where it’s possible to introduce narratives that change the broader culture. To meet these windows, we need to start policy and narrative work during the crisis.

**Creating XRisk infrastructure**
=================================

There are plenty of exciting ideas out there for creating long-term XRisk infrastructure out of COVID-19 but not very many people acting on them. Here are just a few:

• Improving prediction markets: Prediction markets like [Metaculus](https://www.metaculus.com/) could benefit from more quality forecasters, increased organizational capacity, and extended influence media (e.g., media coverage and credibility amongst policy-makers).

• Increasing community world-modeling capabilities: This might simply include stimulating more quality analysis via a crisis which requires understanding many relevant parts of the world. Or it might include the building and improvement of tools like [Guesstimate](https://www.getguesstimate.com/).

• Creating prize competitions: One idea I’ve seen is creating a prestigious prize like the Nobel for outstanding contributions to global risk reduction. One could start awarding these during the current crisis and build it into an ongoing institution post-crisis. This could make it not only more acceptable, but also widely virtuous to make contributions to global risks such as future pandemics, nuclear war, and AI safety.

  

In summary, there is ample opportunity to treat COVID-19 as an XRisk capacity-building intervention. If you find yourself interested in acting on this opportunity, here are a few resources:

• [The Effective Altruism Coronavirus Discussion Facebook Group](https://www.facebook.com/groups/EACoronavirus)

• [Coronavirus Research Ideas for EAs](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/AcksHPwQupvPRKcZm/coronavirus-research-ideas-for-eas?fbclid=IwAR2l2itOUU6XBUrCn31TuBKH92F3ccA7Fm9IV1gvB-N8w0BFVnT4o1g-n-Y) from Peter Hurford

• [A database of EA responses to COVID-19](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ntCWsQYRk_QvuwpB9SSJpYN5R-e9s2NQjXZe88XXfSA/edit?fbclid=IwAR3D_oXU-Rix-zDYsUMZUiXSAu_DrVMX0wb8YNkuPbff5sJsK6SGQeU5xy4#gid=0), organized by Michal Trzesimiech

• [The Resilient Socieities Initiative](http://resilientsocietiesinitiative.org/). We’re interested in hearing proposals from EAs and rationalists even if they’re at the idea stage.