Hanhpt23/IQBench huggingface dataset:
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us some insects are birds. Statement 2 tells us all birds are fruits. From these, we can deduce that those insects that are birds must also be fruits (through transitivity), making conclusion ii) valid. However, conclusion i) reverses the relationship incorrectly - just because all birds are fruits doesn't mean all fruits are birds. Therefore, only conclusion ii) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: E
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us some books are markers, which directly validates conclusion ii) "some markers are books" (just reworded). Statement 2 tells us all crayons are markers, which means some markers are crayons (the reverse relationship with "some" is valid), validating conclusion i). Since both conclusions logically follow from the given statements, option E is correct.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: E
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us all musicians are dancers. Statement 2 tells us all dancers are athletes. Through transitivity, all musicians are athletes, validating conclusion i). Additionally, since all musicians are dancers (from statement 1), it means some dancers are musicians (the reverse relationship with "some" is valid), validating conclusion ii). Therefore, both conclusions follow from the given statements.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us all monitors are keyboards. Statement 2 tells us no keyboard is a mouse. Conclusion i) states some monitors are mice, which contradicts the statements (since all monitors are keyboards, and no keyboard is a mouse). Conclusion ii) rephrases Statement 2 in its logical equivalent form - "No keyboard is a mouse" is logically equivalent to "No mouse is a keyboard." Therefore, only conclusion ii) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us all plates are notebooks. Statement 2 tells us all notebooks are hats. Through transitivity, this means all plates are hats, contradicting conclusion i) which states some plates are not hats. For conclusion ii), since all plates are notebooks and all notebooks are hats, some hats must be plates (the subset relationship), making conclusion ii) valid. Therefore, only conclusion ii) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us some cats are birds. Statement 2 tells us some birds are dolphins. Conclusion i) states some cats are dolphins, but we cannot determine this from the statements - the cats that are birds might not be the same birds that are dolphins. Conclusion ii) states all birds are dolphins, which contradicts Statement 2 that says only "some" birds are dolphins. Neither conclusion logically follows from the given statements.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: E
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us all laptops are tablets. Statement 2 tells us all tablets are devices. Through transitivity, all laptops are devices, validating conclusion i). Additionally, since all laptops are devices, it means some devices are laptops (the reverse relationship with "some" is valid), validating conclusion ii). Therefore, both conclusions follow from the given statements.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us some rabbits are foxes. Statement 2 tells us some foxes are wolves. From these statements, we cannot determine if any rabbits are wolves - the rabbits that are foxes might be completely different from the foxes that are wolves. Since we can't verify if any rabbits are wolves, we also can't verify if any wolves are rabbits (conclusions i and ii are logically equivalent). Therefore, neither conclusion follows from the given statements.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us all ships are insects. Statement 2 tells us some cars are insects. From these statements, we cannot determine if any ships are cars - both ships and cars are categories of insects, but they could be completely separate subsets with no overlap. Conclusion i) states all ships are cars, which can't be verified. Conclusion ii) states some cars are ships, which also can't be verified. Therefore, neither conclusion follows from the given statements.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us all houses are pencils. Statement 2 tells us no pencil is candy. Through transitivity, if all houses are pencils and no pencil is candy, then no house can be candy - validating conclusion i). However, conclusion ii) reverses the relationship in Statement 1 incorrectly - just because all houses are pencils doesn't mean all pencils are houses. Therefore, only conclusion i) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us all bicycles are dogs. Statement 2 tells us all umbrellas are dogs. From these statements, we can only determine that both bicycles and umbrellas are subsets of dogs, but we cannot establish any relationship between bicycles and umbrellas themselves. They could be completely separate subsets of dogs with no overlap. Therefore, neither conclusion i) nor conclusion ii) can be verified from the given statements.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Reasoning: Statement 1: "Only a few chairs are plants" definitively means some chairs are plants and some chairs are NOT plants. Statement 2: "No plant is computer" means plants and computers are completely separate groups. Statement 3: "All computers are books" is not directly relevant to our conclusions. For conclusion i): We know some chairs are plants (from Statement 1), and no plants are computers (from Statement 2). Therefore, these chairs that are plants cannot be computers, proving that some chairs are not computers. Conclusion i) follows. For conclusion ii): The statement "Only a few chairs are plants" rules out the possibility that all chairs are plants. The phrase "only a few" necessarily means that most chairs are not plants, making it impossible for all chairs to be plants. Conclusion ii) does not follow. Since only conclusion i) follows, option A is correct.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: For conclusion i): All bright things are lamps, but only some lamps are metallic. This means some lamps are not metallic, so it's impossible for all bright things to be metallic.
For conclusion ii): We know some lamps are metallic and no metallic thing is wooden, but this tells us nothing about whether non-metallic lamps are wooden. There's insufficient information to determine if any lamps are wooden.
Neither conclusion follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Statement 1 says some fruits are sweet. Statement 2 says few sweet things are plates, meaning some sweet things are plates. Statement 3 says all plates are utensils. From Statement 2 and 3, we know that sweet plates are utensils, making conclusion ii) valid. However, we can't determine if any fruits are plates - the sweet fruits might not be among the few sweet things that are plates. Therefore, only conclusion ii) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1 says no book is teacher. Statement 2 says no teacher is flower. Statement 3 says only Emma is flower, meaning Emma alone is flower. From Statement 3, we know flower and Emma are the same, so substituting flower with Emma in Statement 2 gives us "no teacher is Emma," directly contradicting conclusion ii). As for conclusion i), it is not mentioned whether Emma is a book or not, so conclusion i) also does not follow.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1: All birds are smart.
Statement 2: Only a few cats are dogs (some cats are dogs).
Statement 3: No dog is smart.
For conclusion i): The statements tell us about birds being smart and cats being dogs, but provide no direct relation between cats and birds. We cannot establish if any cats are birds at all, so conclusion i) doesn't follow.
For conclusion ii): Some cats are dogs (from Statement 2), and no dog is smart (from Statement 3). This means some cats are not smart, directly contradicting the claim that all cats are smart. Therefore, conclusion ii) doesn't follow.
Since neither conclusion follows from the given statements, option D is correct.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1: "Only Berries are fruits" means all fruits are berries.
Statement 2: "No berry is sweet" means berries and sweet things are completely separate groups.
For conclusion i): Since all fruits are berries (Statement 1), and no berry is sweet (Statement 2), it follows that no fruit can be sweet. This directly contradicts conclusion i), so it doesn't follow.
For conclusion ii): Statement 2 directly states that no berry is sweet, which means no berry can be sweet. This directly contradicts conclusion ii), so it doesn't follow.
Since neither conclusion follows from the given statements, option D is correct.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Statement 1: "Only paintings are artistic" means all artistic things are paintings, but it doesn't mean all paintings are artistic. Some paintings could be non-artistic.
Statement 2: "No artistic thing is digital" means artistic things and digital things are separate groups.
For conclusion i): While artistic paintings cannot be digital (from Statement 2), paintings that are not artistic could potentially be digital. The statements don't rule out this possibility. Therefore, conclusion i) is possible and follows.
For conclusion ii): Since some paintings are artistic (implied by Statement 1), and no artistic thing is digital (Statement 2), at least some paintings cannot be digital. This directly contradicts the claim that all paintings can be digital. Therefore, conclusion ii) doesn't follow.
So the correct answer is A (Only conclusion i follows).
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Statement 1: "All lions are predators" means lions are a subset of predators.
Statement 2: "All tigers are lions" means tigers are a subset of lions.
For conclusion i): Statement 2 tells us that all tigers are lions, but it doesn't mean that all lions are tigers. Tigers could be a proper subset of lions, with some lions not being tigers. Therefore, conclusion i) doesn't follow.
For conclusion ii): "All lions can be tigers" refers to possibility. Given that all tigers are lions (Statement 2), it's logically possible that all lions could also be tigers (even if we don't know for certain). Nothing in the statements contradicts this possibility. Therefore, conclusion ii) follows.
Since only conclusion ii) follows, option B is correct.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Statement 1: "All crystals are minerals" means crystals are a subset of minerals.
Statement 2: "Some minerals are valuable" means there's an overlap between minerals and valuable things.
For conclusion i): Since all crystals are minerals (Statement 1), and some minerals are valuable (Statement 2), it's possible that the valuable minerals include some crystals. Nothing in the statements contradicts this possibility. Therefore, some crystals can be valuable, and conclusion i) follows.
For conclusion ii): Statement 2 only tells us that some minerals are valuable, not that all valuable things are minerals. Since crystals are a subset of minerals (Statement 1), we cannot conclude that all valuable things are crystals. Therefore, conclusion ii) doesn't follow.
Since only conclusion i) follows, option A is correct.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Statement 1: "All seeds are plants" indicates that seeds are a subset of plants.
Statement 2: "Some seeds are organic" shows there is an overlap between seeds and organic items.
Statement 3: "No organic thing is plastic" establishes that organic and plastic items are completely distinct.

Conclusion i): From Statements 1 and 2, we know that some seeds are both plants and organic. Given Statement 3, since no organic item is plastic, these organic plants cannot be plastic. This proves that some plants are not plastic, so conclusion i) follows.

Conclusion ii): From Statements 1 and 2, we know that some seeds are both plants and organic. This directly demonstrates that some organic things are plants, making this conclusion certain, rather than a possibility.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: E
Explanation: Statement 1: "All chapters are books" means chapters are a subset of books.
Statement 2: "All books are documents" means books are a subset of documents.
Statement 3: "No document is digital" means documents and digital things are completely separate.
For conclusion i): From Statement 1, all chapters are books. From Statement 2, all books are documents. Through transitivity, all chapters are documents. From Statement 3, no document is digital. Therefore, no chapter is digital. Conclusion i) follows.
For conclusion ii): From Statement 1, all chapters are books, and from Statement 2, all books are documents. This means chapters are a subset of documents, which directly proves that some documents are chapters. Conclusion ii) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Statement 1: "Only a few mountains are rocky" means some mountains are rocky.
Statement 2: "All rocky things are minerals" means rocky things are a subset of minerals.
Statement 3: "Some minerals are valuable" means there's an overlap between minerals and valuable things.
For conclusion i): Statement 2 tells us all rocky things are minerals, and Statement 3 tells us some minerals are valuable. This doesn't determine whether rocky things are among the valuable minerals or not. We have insufficient information to determine if rocky things and valuable things overlap. Conclusion i) doesn't follow.
For conclusion ii): Statement 1 tells us some mountains are rocky, and Statement 2 tells us all rocky things are minerals. This means some mountains are minerals (the rocky ones). However, conclusion ii) is phrased as "can be" which implies possibility rather than certainty. Since we've established that some mountains are definitely minerals, the conclusion about possibility isn't quite accurate. The conclusion doesn't follow in the technical logical sense.
Since neither conclusion follows, option D is correct.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: The statements tell us some tropical plants are fragrant and some fragrant things are colorful. This creates two logical possibilities: either the set of fragrant tropical plants overlaps with fragrant colorful things (making conclusion i true), or these sets are completely separate (making conclusion ii true). Since these are mutually exclusive possibilities and one must be true based on the given information, either conclusion i or conclusion ii follows, but not both - leading to answer C.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Statement 1 ("Only a few galaxies are stars") means some galaxies are stars, but most are not. Statement 2 ("All galaxies are cosmic") means galaxies are a subset of cosmic things. Statement 3 ("No cosmic thing is planetary") means cosmic and planetary are disjoint sets. For conclusion i), since cosmic and planetary things are completely separate, and stars are a type of cosmic thing (through galaxies), there's no restriction preventing planetary things from being stars. Therefore, it's possible that all planetary things are stars. For conclusion ii), we already know some cosmic things (the star-galaxies) are definitely stars - this is a certainty, not just a possibility. Therefore, only conclusion i) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Statement 1 ("Only flowers are paintings") means all paintings are flowers, but doesn't tell us if all flowers are paintings. Statement 2 ("Some flowers are petals") tells us some flowers are petals. While these petals are flowers, we don't know if these particular flowers are paintings, so we can't conclude that some petals can be paintings. For conclusion ii), Statement 3 ("Only a few petals are insects") directly tells us that most petals are not insects, which means some petals are definitely not insects. Therefore, only conclusion ii) follows.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: E
Explanation: Statement 1 tells us some roses are tulips. Statement 2 tells us all tulips are flowers. This means those roses that are tulips must also be flowers, proving conclusion ii) that some roses are flowers. For conclusion i), the statement about "only a few daisies are red" doesn't restrict tulips from being red. Since there's no direct connection established between tulips and red or between tulips and daisies, it remains possible that all tulips could be red - nothing in the statements contradicts this possibility. Therefore, both conclusions follow.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: From our statements, we know that a few cameras are DSLR, all DSLRs are professional, and no professional equipment is disposable. For non-DSLR cameras (which are most cameras), we have no information about whether they are disposable or not. This creates a logical dichotomy: either some non-DSLR cameras are disposable (making conclusion i true) OR no disposable items are cameras at all (making conclusion ii true). These are mutually exclusive possibilities - either some cameras are disposable or none are - and one of them must be true. Since exactly one of these conclusions must follow from the given statements (but we cannot determine which one), the answer is C (Either i or ii follows).
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Analyzing the statements: a few bicycles are electric, all electric bicycles are premium, and all premium items are expensive. For conclusion i) "Some electric are expensive," since all electric are premium (statement 2) and all premium are expensive (statement 3), it directly follows that all electric must be expensive, making "some electric are expensive" definitely true. For conclusion ii) "Some electric can be premium," this phrasing implies uncertainty or possibility. However, our second statement definitively states "All electric are premium" - not just some and not as a possibility but as a fact. Therefore, conclusion ii) does not accurately reflect what we know from the premises. Since only conclusion i) correctly follows from the given statements, the answer is A.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: E
Explanation: Analyzing the statements carefully: some metals are not silver, only a few silver items are alloys, and all alloys are conductive. For conclusion i) "Some metals can be conductive," we know some silver items are alloys (statement 2) and all alloys are conductive (statement 3), so some silver items are conductive. While statement 1 doesn't directly connect metals to being conductive, the possibility exists that some metals are conductive, making conclusion i) valid. For conclusion ii) "Some silver are not alloys," statement 2 clearly states "Only a few silver are alloys," which directly implies that most silver items are not alloys. This makes conclusion ii) definitely true. Since both conclusions necessarily follow from the given statements, the answer is E.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: From our statements, we know some laptops are gaming devices, some gaming devices are wireless, and a few wireless devices are waterproof. For conclusion i) "Some laptops can be waterproof," the phrasing "can be" indicates possibility rather than certainty. Since laptops → gaming → wireless → waterproof creates a possible path, even if not guaranteed, some laptops could potentially be waterproof. This possibility makes conclusion i) valid. For conclusion ii) "Some waterproof are gaming," we can't establish this with certainty because while some gaming devices are wireless and some wireless are waterproof, we have no guarantee that these specific sets overlap. The waterproof wireless devices might not be the same as the gaming wireless devices. Since only conclusion i) follows as a possibility from the given statements, the answer is A.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise indicates that some pets are not dogs, but since the second premise states that no cats are pets, it follows that cats are not included in the category of pets. Therefore, the conclusion that "some cats are not dogs" cannot be inferred, as it does not logically connect cats to the discussion of pets and dogs.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Reasoning: Since all students are learners and all learners are thinkers, it logically follows that some thinkers are indeed students.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that all flowers are plants, and the second states that some flowers are roses. This does not imply that no plants are roses; in fact, it suggests that some plants are roses.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that no cars are bicycles, and the second states that all vehicles are bicycles. This means that no cars can be vehicles, making the conclusion that "some cars are vehicles" logically invalid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that some fruits are not sweet, and the second states that no vegetables are fruits. This does not imply anything about the sweetness of vegetables, making the conclusion that "some vegetables are not sweet" logically invalid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that all vehicles are cars, while the second premise states that no vehicles are bicycles. Since there is no relationship established between bicycles and cars through the premises, we cannot conclude that "some bicycles are not cars." The conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that no doctors are athletes, while the second premise states that all teachers are athletes. Since doctors cannot be athletes and teachers are a subset of athletes, it follows that doctors cannot be teachers. Therefore, the conclusion that "some doctors are teachers" is logically invalid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that no chefs are bakers, and the second premise states that all Italians are chefs. Since Italians cannot be bakers, it follows that there are bakers who are not Italians. Therefore, the conclusion that "some bakers are not Italians" is logically valid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that all highways are paths, while the second states that no highways are bike lanes. This does not provide any information about the relationship between bike lanes and paths. Therefore, we cannot conclude that "some bike lanes are not paths." The conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that all dogs are pets, and the second premise states that all pets are friendly. Therefore, it follows that some friendly beings (specifically, pets) are indeed dogs. The conclusion that "some friendly beings are dogs" is logically valid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that no athletes are singers, while the second states that all performers are athletes. Since performers cannot be singers, it follows that some singers are indeed not performers. Therefore, the conclusion that "some singers are not performers" is logically valid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that all cars are vehicles, and the second states that some cars are electric. This does not imply that no vehicles are electric, as some vehicles (specifically, the electric cars) are part of the vehicle category. Therefore, the conclusion that "no vehicles are electric" is logically invalid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that no cats are dogs, and the second states that no dogs are birds. This does not lead to the conclusion that all cats are birds. In fact, it suggests that cats and birds are separate categories. Therefore, the conclusion that "all cats are birds" is logically invalid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that all flowers are plants, and the second states that all plants are living things. Therefore, it follows that some living things (specifically, the flowers) are indeed classified as flowers. The conclusion that "some living things are flowers" is logically valid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: The first premise states that no apples are oranges, and the second states that no oranges are bananas. This does not imply that all apples are bananas; in fact, it suggests that apples, oranges, and bananas are separate categories. Therefore, the conclusion that "all apples are bananas" is logically invalid.
Topic: Verbal Reasoning Test with Syllogisms
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Reasoning: Since all sparrows are birds and all birds are animals, it logically follows that all sparrows are indeed animals.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: This statement is false (Option B) as the passage states: “Organizations pay students on a fixed rate without the usual entitlement to paid holidays or sick leave.”
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: We cannot say whether this statement is true or false (Option C) as the passage does not make reference to the discipline or grievance procedures for students
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: This statement is true (Option A) as the passage states: “Furthermore, it is not uncommon for companies to experience peak workloads in the summer...”
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Explanation: Feathers are characteristic of birds, and scales are characteristic of reptiles.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Explanation: The sentence suggests a contrast between Susan's appearance and her actual behavior.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: Explanation: 'Mitigate' means to make something less severe, while 'worsen' means to make something more severe.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Explanation: Earth is a planet, just as Jupiter is a planet.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: Explanation: The sentence implies that the proposal was rejected due to lack of merit.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Explanation: The sentence suggests a difference between the movie's reviews and the audience's response.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: Explanation: 'Acerbic' means sharp or harsh, often in terms of taste or tone, while 'sweet' means pleasant or agreeable.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Explanation: A mile is a unit of distance, just as an inch is a unit of height.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Explanation: The sentence implies that the audience was amazed by the magician's tricks.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Explanation: The sentence suggests that despite the novel's length, it was an enjoyable read.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: Explanation: The passage states that The Sugar Mill is famous for its delicious cookies, cakes, and pastries.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Explanation: The passage mentions that Mrs. Thompson arrives at the bakery at 5:00 am.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Explanation: The passage describes the "Glenhill Special" as a unique combination of flavors that has become a local favorite.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Explanation: The passage states that The Sugar Mill offers a warm and inviting atmosphere.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: Explanation: The passage mentions that The Sugar Mill's warm and inviting atmosphere makes it a popular spot for community events and gatherings.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Solution: For Given Series: DEW BIG RAW FAN DOG, if we exchange the alphabets we get: WED GIB WAR NAF GOD, from the words 4 are meaningful words such as WED, GIB, WAR and GOD.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: The above statements implies the following things: # means Son, % means Sister, $ means Father, @ means Wife. From the above options, we need to find an expression which represents I as the brother of H.  So, check all the options and eliminate those in which either the gender is of I is unknown, or I is female.  In the above question, @ and % represents wife and sister respectively such as female so eliminate all such options. And if in any expression, I is present in the end then it means that the gender of I will be unknown so eliminate such options too.  From the above trick we can eliminate options 1,2, and 3. Hence in the expression “H%I$P”, I is the brother of H.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: Solution: To calculate the repeat year, we need to add 28 in case of a leap year. So, 2012+28 = 2040. Hence, the correct answer will be 2040.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: Solution: Angle at 7:30 is: I60H – (11M / 2) = θI  (60 x 7 – 11 x 30) / 2 = θ  420 – 330 / 2 = θ  θ = 90 / 2 = 45 degree
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: If we use the Pythagoras formula, then we get : H^2 = 60^2 + 80^2  => H^2 = 10000 => H = 100
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: In the argument, there is a job for you if you are a classical dancer. If you are not, then there is no job because the job is only for a classical dancer. In assumption 1 there is a need for a classical dancer. So, this assumption supports the argument. In assumption 2 we are not sure that the person is a classical dancer or not. So this assumption doesn’t support the argument. Hence only assumption 1 is implicit.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: It cannot be said for given statements that "if one sleeps, all his diseases get cured" because there is no such relation given in the statements. We have not to something on our own. So, Conclusion 1 is not implicit. It cannot be said for given statements that "sleep is the medicine for all the diseases" because there is no such relation given in the statements. We have not to something on our own. So, Conclusion 2 is not implicit. Hence, the correct answer is "Neither conclusion I nor II follows".
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: Given: Statements: The quality of teachers in government schools has deteriorated and parents prefer to enroll their children in private schools. Conclusion I: The authorities should take immediate action to improve the quality of teachers in schools. As given in the statement that the quality of teachers in government schools has deteriorated and parents prefer to enroll their children in private schools, taking immediate action to improve the quality of teachers in schools will help to improve the condition of the government schools and discourage children shifting towards private school. Therefore, the conclusion I follows. Conclusion II: All government schools should either be privatized or closed completely. The closing or privatizing all government schools will not the solution for parents who are shifting planning to shift their children to private schools, as the poor quality of teachers will still remain the same, and people from poor backgrounds cannot afford to send their children to private schools due to high fees. Therefore, conclusion II does not follow. Hence, the correct answer is "Only conclusion I follows".
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: (Implicit - suggested though not directly expressed) I. M Com final exam is a reasonable proof of an accountant's capability. The phrase “employment status will automatically be converted to permanent on submission of pass result of M Com final exam” indirectly suggests that M Com final exam ensures the candidate’s credibility to such an extent that the candidate’s position can be made permanent on the basis of the pass result. Thus, it can be assumed that M Com final exam is considered as a proof of an accountant’s capability. II. All trainees are appointed on temporary basis. The letter is being addressed to a particular candidate as it is an appointment letter. Therefore, we cannot generalize the situation of the candidate. Hence, only assumption I is implicit.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: From the statement above, we can understand that White Revolution was a successful dairy production movement of India therefore we can conclude that it helped increase milk production in India. Therefore, conclusion II follows. On the other hand, from the information above, we cannot conclude who started this movement. Therefore, conclusion I does not follows. Hence, Only conclusion II follows.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: It can be assumed that IIM does provide good management studies that is why Y advised X. Hence assumption 1 supports the argument. If Y is advising X therefore, it can be assumed that X listens to Y. So, assumption 2 supports the argument. Note: When you are advising someone, you can assume that the person is willing to listen to your advise. That is, the possibility of such an assumption does exist. Thus, in this question, the second assumption is implicit. When Y is advising X, he might be assuming that X will listen to his advice.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: From the statement above, we get information about the most debatable topic in Indian media which is Politics. But the information provided is not sufficient enough for us to conclude the likes and dislikes of every Indian. Therefore, the conclusion I do not follow. On the other hand, we can easily conclude that a large part of the Indian audience has a liking for discussions on political issues which makes the media use it as a topic for debates more frequently. Therefore, conclusion II follows. Hence, Only conclusion II follows.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: In the statement student 1 is asking for notes prepared by student 2 for studying, thus we can assume that student 2 “has prepared the notes”. The statement clearly mentions that student 1 wants the notes “to study”, hence we cannot assume that he “wants to verify his understanding”. Therefore, only assumption I is implicit.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: I. The rules followed in the school are not proper→ False (some students do not behave properly even if there are strict rules) II. Such a student should be expelled from school → False (as there are many students who behave improperly and the removal of a student from school doesn’t correct their behavior) Hence, none of the given conclusion follows.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: In the statement, we can see that total runs made by the losing team A is 70 before losing all the wickets. So, either batting of Team A was poor or the bowling of Team B was very good. So, either I or II follows.
Topic: Inductive Verbal Reasoning Test
Question: Answer the multiple-choice question in the image with reasoning, and give only the letter of the correct option as the final answer.
Answer: C
Explanation: Smoking is injurious to health irrespective of the fact still people smokes. But argument is talking about the smoking in public. So, assumption 1 is not implicit. if one person smokes in public then his smoking effects other people health too. So, Assumption 2 is implicit.