2014 vs .2013 sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) , as higher volumes of 9% ( 9 % ) and favorable currency of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .electronics sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) , as higher delivery systems equipment sales and materials volumes of 8% ( 8 % ) and favorable currency of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .performance materials sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) , as higher volumes of 11% ( 11 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .the higher volumes were across all product lines and major regions .the lower pricing was primarily due to unfavorable mix impacts .operating income of $ 425.3 increased 32% ( 32 % ) , or $ 104.0 , primarily from higher volumes of $ 93 , lower operating costs of $ 31 , and favorable currency impacts of $ 5 , partially offset by unfavorable price and mix impacts of $ 26 .operating margin of 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) increased 310 bp , primarily due to improved loading and leverage from the higher volumes and improved cost performance , partially offset by the unfavorable pricing impacts .2013 vs .2012 sales decreased 3% ( 3 % ) , as lower volumes of 4% ( 4 % ) and lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by acquisitions of 2% ( 2 % ) .electronics sales decreased 8% ( 8 % ) , as weaker materials volumes and equipment sales were partially offset by the acquisition of da nanomaterials .performance materials sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) , as higher volumes of 4% ( 4 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 2% ( 2 % ) .the increase in volumes was primarily due to strength in the automobile and u.s .housing markets partially offset by weaker volumes to certain construction markets and marine coatings .the lower pricing was primarily due to unfavorable mix impacts .operating income of $ 321.3 decreased 25% ( 25 % ) , or $ 104.3 , and operating margin of 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) decreased 400 bp , as 2012 included a gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials of $ 85.9 .on a non-gaap basis , operating income of $ 321.3 decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 18.4 , primarily from unfavorable price and mix impacts of $ 15 , lower volumes of $ 9 , and higher operating costs of $ 4 partially offset by higher acquisitions of $ 6 and favorable currency of $ 4 .operating margin decreased 30 bp , primarily due to lower volumes and unfavorable price mix .equipment and energy .
[['', '2014', '2013', '2012'], ['sales', '$ 450.4', '$ 451.1', '$ 420.1'], ['operating income', '88.2', '65.5', '44.6']]
2014 vs .2013 sales of $ 450.4 were relatively flat as higher liquefied natural gas ( lng ) project activity was offset by lower air separation ( asu ) project activity .operating income of $ 88.2 increased from the higher lng project activity .the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2014 was $ 520 , compared to $ 402 at 30 september 2013 .the increase was primarily due to new lng orders as global project development activity remains high .it is expected that approximately $ 320 of the backlog will be completed during 2015 .2013 vs .2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .also included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .other also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .2014 vs .2013 other operating loss was $ 13.5 , compared to $ 4.7 in the prior year .the decrease was primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange losses of $ 5 and lifo adjustments of $ 4 .2013 vs .2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .the other operating loss in 2013 includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .the other operating loss in 2012 included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10. .

Question: what was the operating margin for 2012?
Answer: 10.61%
Explanation: it is the operating income divided by the net sales in 2012 , then turned into a percentage .