HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
item 6 .selected financial data the following table sets forth our selected financial data .the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k. .
[['( $ in millions except per share amounts )', 'year ended december 31 2017', 'year ended december 31 2016', 'year ended december 31 2015', 'year ended december 31 2014', 'year ended december 31 2013'], ['sales and service revenues', '$ 7441', '$ 7068', '$ 7020', '$ 6957', '$ 6820'], ['goodwill impairment', '2014', '2014', '75', '47', '2014'], ['operating income ( loss )', '865', '858', '769', '655', '512'], ['net earnings ( loss )', '479', '573', '404', '338', '261'], ['total assets', '6374', '6352', '6024', '6239', '6190'], ['long-term debt ( 1 )', '1279', '1278', '1273', '1562', '1665'], ['total long-term obligations', '3225', '3356', '3260', '3562', '3277'], ['net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities', '814', '822', '861', '755', '260'], ['free cash flow ( 2 )', '453', '537', '673', '590', '121'], ['dividends declared per share', '$ 2.52', '$ 2.10', '$ 1.70', '$ 1.00', '$ 0.50'], ['basic earnings ( loss ) per share', '$ 10.48', '$ 12.24', '$ 8.43', '$ 6.93', '$ 5.25'], ['diluted earnings ( loss ) per share', '$ 10.46', '$ 12.14', '$ 8.36', '$ 6.86', '$ 5.18']]
( 1 ) long-term debt does not include the current portion of long-term debt , which is included in current liabilities .( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds .see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .

Question: what was the return on total assets during 2013?
Answer: 4.2%
Explanation: net income over total assets
item 5 .market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .
[['', '2010', '2011', '2012', '2013', '2014', '2015'], ['loews common stock', '100.0', '97.37', '106.04', '126.23', '110.59', '101.72'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.0', '102.11', '118.45', '156.82', '178.29', '180.75'], ['loews peer group ( a )', '100.0', '101.59', '115.19', '145.12', '152.84', '144.70']]
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .and the travelers companies , inc .dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -2.6%
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 25 , 2008 , may 27 , 2007 , and may 28 , 2006 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts administrative expenses , including the reclassification of the cumulative after-tax charges of $ 21.9 million from accumulated other comprehensive income .during fiscal 2007 , the company closed on the sale of these notes for approximately $ 117 million , net of transaction expenses , resulting in no additional gain or loss .8 .inventories the major classes of inventories are as follows: .
[['', '2008', '2007'], ['raw materials and packaging', '$ 580.8', '$ 458.5'], ['work in progress', '100.0', '94.6'], ['finished goods', '1179.1', '1001.3'], ['supplies and other', '71.6', '70.7'], ['total', '$ 1931.5', '$ 1625.1']]
9 .credit facilities and borrowings at may 25 , 2008 , the company had credit lines from banks that totaled approximately $ 2.3 billion .these lines are comprised of a $ 1.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions which matures in december 2011 , uncommitted short-term loan facilities approximating $ 364 million , and uncommitted trade finance facilities approximating $ 424 million .borrowings under the multi-year facility bear interest at or below prime rate and may be prepaid without penalty .the company has not drawn upon this multi- year facility .the uncommitted trade finance facilities mentioned above were maintained in order to finance certain working capital needs of the company 2019s trading and merchandising operations .subsequent to the sale of this business in june 2008 , the company exited these facilities .the company finances its short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings , commercial paper borrowings , and bankers 2019 acceptances .as of may 25 , 2008 , the company had outstanding borrowings of $ 578.3 million , primarily under the commercial paper arrangements .the weighted average interest rate on these borrowings as of may 25 , 2008 was 2.76% ( 2.76 % ) .the average consolidated short-term borrowings outstanding under these facilities were $ 418.5 million and $ 4.3 million for fiscal 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2007?
Answer: 62%
entergy texas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2015 net revenue', '$ 637.2'], ['reserve equalization', '14.3'], ['purchased power capacity', '12.4'], ['transmission revenue', '7.0'], ['retail electric price', '5.4'], ['net wholesale', '-27.8 ( 27.8 )'], ['other', '-4.3 ( 4.3 )'], ['2016 net revenue', '$ 644.2']]
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?
Answer: 7
part ii .item 5 .market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending december 29 .copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .all rights reserved .nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .
[['', '12/28/2013', '1/3/2015', '1/2/2016', '12/31/2016', '12/30/2017', '12/29/2018'], ['cadence design systems inc .', '$ 100.00', '$ 135.18', '$ 149.39', '$ 181.05', '$ 300.22', '$ 311.13'], ['nasdaq composite', '100.00', '112.60', '113.64', '133.19', '172.11', '165.84'], ['s&p 500', '100.00', '110.28', '109.54', '129.05', '157.22', '150.33'], ['s&p 500 information technology', '100.00', '115.49', '121.08', '144.85', '201.10', '200.52']]
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the period ending 12/29/2018?
Answer: 211.13%
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .
[['fiscal year ended ( 2 )', 'snap-onincorporated', 'peer group ( 3 )', 's&p 500'], ['december 31 2007', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00'], ['december 31 2008', '83.66', '66.15', '63.00'], ['december 31 2009', '93.20', '84.12', '79.67'], ['december 31 2010', '128.21', '112.02', '91.67'], ['december 31 2011', '117.47', '109.70', '93.61'], ['december 31 2012', '187.26', '129.00', '108.59']]
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .grainger , inc .cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 .2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .

Question: what was the ratio of the snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index in 2012
Answer: 1.72
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .
[['in millions of dollars', 'accretable yield', 'carrying amount of loan receivable', 'allowance'], ['beginning balance', '$ 27', '$ 920', '$ 95'], ['purchases ( 1 )', '1', '130', '2014'], ['disposals/payments received', '-11 ( 11 )', '-594 ( 594 )', '2014'], ['accretion', '-44 ( 44 )', '44', '2014'], ['builds ( reductions ) to the allowance', '128', '2014', '-18 ( 18 )'], ['increase to expected cash flows', '-2 ( 2 )', '19', '2014'], ['fx/other', '17', '-50 ( 50 )', '2014'], ['balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )', '$ 116', '$ 469', '$ 77']]
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: what is the percentage of allowance of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?
Answer: 16%
Explanation: looking to see how aggressively the loan portfolio is reserved for
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .the refund was made in december 2001 .2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .
[['', '2002', '2001', '2000'], ['net mw in operation at december 31', '3955', '3445', '2475'], ['generation in gwh for the year', '29953', '22614', '7171'], ['capacity factor for the year', '93% ( 93 % )', '93% ( 93 % )', '94% ( 94 % )']]
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: what is the percent change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 57.0%
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .
[['', 'total number of shares purchased', 'average price paid per share2', 'total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs', 'maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs'], ['october 1-31', '29704', '$ 5.99', '2014', '2014'], ['november 1-30', '4468', '$ 3.24', '2014', '2014'], ['december 1-31', '12850', '$ 3.98', '2014', '2014'], ['total1', '47022', '$ 5.18', '2014', '2014']]
total1 ................................47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .

Question: what was the average price per share from november to december?
Answer: 3.61
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .
[['in millions of dollars', 'accretable yield', 'carrying amount of loan receivable', 'allowance'], ['beginning balance', '$ 27', '$ 920', '$ 95'], ['purchases ( 1 )', '1', '130', '2014'], ['disposals/payments received', '-11 ( 11 )', '-594 ( 594 )', '2014'], ['accretion', '-44 ( 44 )', '44', '2014'], ['builds ( reductions ) to the allowance', '128', '2014', '-18 ( 18 )'], ['increase to expected cash flows', '-2 ( 2 )', '19', '2014'], ['fx/other', '17', '-50 ( 50 )', '2014'], ['balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )', '$ 116', '$ 469', '$ 77']]
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: what is the gross carrying amount in millions of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?
Answer: 469