HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .
[['plan category', 'number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )', 'weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights', 'number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )'], ['equity compensation plans approved by security holders', '448859', '$ 0.00', '4087587'], ['equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )', '2014', '2014', '2014'], ['total', '448859', '$ 0.00', '4087587']]
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: what portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders is to be issued upon the exercise of options warrants and rights?
Answer: 9.9%
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2015 net revenue', '$ 1666'], ['nuclear realized price changes', '-149 ( 149 )'], ['rhode island state energy center', '-44 ( 44 )'], ['nuclear volume', '-36 ( 36 )'], ['fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement', '41'], ['nuclear fuel expenses', '68'], ['other', '-4 ( 4 )'], ['2016 net revenue', '$ 1542']]
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Question: what are the nuclear fuel expenses as a percentage of 2016 net revenue?
Answer: 4.41%
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .indexes calculated on month-end basis .copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .all rights reserved. .
[['', '12/29/2007', '1/3/2009', '1/2/2010', '1/1/2011', '12/31/2011', '12/29/2012'], ['cadence design systems inc .', '100.00', '22.55', '35.17', '48.50', '61.07', '78.92'], ['nasdaq composite', '100.00', '59.03', '82.25', '97.32', '98.63', '110.78'], ['s&p 400 information technology', '100.00', '54.60', '82.76', '108.11', '95.48', '109.88']]
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the five years ended 12/29/2012?
Answer: -31.86
part ii item 5 .market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .
[['2008', 'high', 'low'], ['quarter ended march 31', '$ 42.72', '$ 32.10'], ['quarter ended june 30', '46.10', '38.53'], ['quarter ended september 30', '43.43', '31.89'], ['quarter ended december 31', '37.28', '19.35'], ['2007', 'high', 'low'], ['quarter ended march 31', '$ 41.31', '$ 36.63'], ['quarter ended june 30', '43.84', '37.64'], ['quarter ended september 30', '45.45', '36.34'], ['quarter ended december 31', '46.53', '40.08']]
on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse .as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders .dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock .we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction .for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what is the average number of common stock shares per register holder as of february 13 , 2009?
Answer: 795786.9
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .
[['( in millions )', 'for the years ended december 31 , 2017', 'for the years ended december 31 , 2016', 'for the years ended december 31 , 2015'], ['net earnings attributable to pmi', '$ 6035', '$ 6967', '$ 6873'], ['less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards', '14', '19', '24'], ['net earnings for basic and diluted eps', '$ 6021', '$ 6948', '$ 6849'], ['weighted-average shares for basic eps', '1552', '1551', '1549'], ['plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )', '1', '2014', '2014'], ['weighted-average shares for diluted eps', '1553', '1551', '1549']]
for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Question: what was the change in weighted-average shares for diluted eps from 2016 to 2017 , in millions?
Answer: 2
equipment and energy .
[['', '2013', '2012', '2011'], ['sales', '$ 451.1', '$ 420.1', '$ 400.6'], ['operating income', '65.5', '44.6', '62.8']]
2013 vs .2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september 2012 .it is expected that approximately $ 250 of the backlog will be completed during 2014 .2012 vs .2011 sales of $ 420.1 increased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 19.5 , reflecting higher air separation unit ( asu ) activity .operating income of $ 44.6 decreased 29% ( 29 % ) , or $ 18.2 , reflecting lower lng project activity .the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2012 was $ 450 , compared to $ 334 at 30 september 2011 .other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .also included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .other also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .2013 vs .2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .the current year includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .the prior year loss included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10 .2012 vs .2011 other operating loss was $ 6.6 , compared to $ 39.3 in the prior year , primarily due to a reduction in stranded costs , a decrease in the lifo adjustment as a result of decreases in inventory values , and favorable foreign exchange , partially offset by gains on asset sales in the prior year. .

Question: considering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?
Answer: 9.41
Explanation: it is the value of sales divided by the operating income .
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees .generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings .these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans .entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants .employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers .as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy employed 14669 people .utility: .
[['entergy arkansas', '1526'], ['entergy gulf states louisiana', '858'], ['entergy louisiana', '1008'], ['entergy mississippi', '828'], ['entergy new orleans', '378'], ['entergy texas', '744'], ['system energy', '-'], ['entergy operations', '2448'], ['entergy services', '3179'], ['entergy nuclear operations', '3620'], ['other subsidiaries', '80'], ['total entergy', '14669']]
approximately 5000 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters union , and the united government security officers of america. .

Question: what percentage of entergy's total employees are employed in entergy arkansas?
Answer: 10.4%
future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries .see part i , item 1a .risk factors - " if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations ," "our business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages" and "we are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result" for additional information .employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive .in 2013 , salaries , wages , and benefits were one of our largest expenses and represented approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our operating expenses .the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2013 .american us airways wholly-owned regional carriers total .
[['', 'american', 'us airways', 'wholly-owned regional carriers', 'total'], ['pilots', '7900', '4100', '3400', '15400'], ['flight attendants', '15000', '7700', '2100', '24800'], ['maintenance personnel', '11300', '3100', '2400', '16800'], ['fleet service personnel', '7400', '5500', '1700', '14600'], ['passenger service personnel', '10300', '6200', '6400', '22900'], ['administrative and other', '8200', '5500', '2200', '15900'], ['total', '60100', '32100', '18200', '110400']]
.

Question: what portion of the total full-time employees of american are pilots?
Answer: 13.1%
entergy mississippi , inc .management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2009 net revenue', '$ 536.7'], ['volume/weather', '18.9'], ['other', '-0.3 ( 0.3 )'], ['2010 net revenue', '$ 555.3']]
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Question: what is the average price of the increased electricity usage per gwh?
Answer: 18068.8
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .the firm is a component of all three industry indices .the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .
[['december 31 ( in dollars )', '2009', '2010', '2011', '2012', '2013', '2014'], ['jpmorgan chase', '$ 100.00', '$ 102.30', '$ 81.87', '$ 111.49', '$ 152.42', '$ 167.48'], ['kbw bank index', '100.00', '123.36', '94.75', '125.91', '173.45', '189.69'], ['s&p financial index', '100.00', '112.13', '93.00', '119.73', '162.34', '186.98'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '115.06', '117.48', '136.27', '180.39', '205.07']]
.

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index over the five year period?
Answer: no