HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .
[['cash flowsmillions', '2014', '2013', '2012'], ['cash provided by operating activities', '$ 7385', '$ 6823', '$ 6161'], ['cash used in investing activities', '-4249 ( 4249 )', '-3405 ( 3405 )', '-3633 ( 3633 )'], ['cash used in financing activities', '-2982 ( 2982 )', '-3049 ( 3049 )', '-2682 ( 2682 )'], ['net change in cash and cashequivalents', '$ 154', '$ 369', '$ -154 ( 154 )']]
operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 8%
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 .the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested .purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 .the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .
[['period', 'total number ofsharespurchased [a]', 'averageprice paidper share', 'total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b]', 'maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]'], ['oct . 1 through oct . 31', '379488', '87.46', '371639', '31370427'], ['nov . 1 through nov . 30', '1748964', '98.41', '1733877', '29636550'], ['dec . 1 through dec . 31', '1787343', '100.26', '1780142', '27856408'], ['total', '3915795', '$ 98.19', '3885658', 'n/a']]
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .[b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 .these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what percentage of total number of shares purchased were purchased in december?
Answer: 46%
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .
[['company/index', 'december 30 2006', 'december 29 2007', 'january 3 2009', 'january 2 2010', 'january 1 2011', 'december 31 2011'], ['advance auto parts', '$ 100.00', '$ 108.00', '$ 97.26', '$ 116.01', '$ 190.41', '$ 201.18'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '104.24', '65.70', '78.62', '88.67', '88.67'], ['s&p retail index', '100.00', '82.15', '58.29', '82.36', '101.84', '104.81']]
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Question: compared to the lowest stock price , how much did advanced auto parts outperform the overall market?
Answer: 71.8%
Explanation: to find the answer one must find the percentage gain for each stock from their lowest stock price . then subtract the two percentage gainst from each other to get the amount that advanced auto parts beat the overall market .
at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus .this reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment .in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .cash flows .
[['millions', '2015', '2014', '2013'], ['cash provided by operating activities', '$ 7344', '$ 7385', '$ 6823'], ['cash used in investing activities', '-4476 ( 4476 )', '-4249 ( 4249 )', '-3405 ( 3405 )'], ['cash used in financing activities', '-3063 ( 3063 )', '-2982 ( 2982 )', '-3049 ( 3049 )'], ['net change in cash and cash equivalents', '$ -195 ( 195 )', '$ 154', '$ 369']]
operating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments .federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 .similarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 .bonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 .higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation .investing activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 .higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 .significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 8%
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .
[['', '12/31/2011', '12/31/2012', '12/31/2013', '12/31/2014', '12/31/2015', '12/31/2016'], ['lkq corporation', '$ 100', '$ 140', '$ 219', '$ 187', '$ 197', '$ 204'], ['s&p 500 index', '$ 100', '$ 113', '$ 147', '$ 164', '$ 163', '$ 178'], ['peer group', '$ 100', '$ 111', '$ 140', '$ 177', '$ 188', '$ 217']]
this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: based on the review of the comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s . ) index and the peer group what was the ratio of the lkq performance to the peer group in 2013
Answer: 1.6
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 .( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
[['company index', 'november 17 2011', 'december 31 2011', 'december 31 2012', 'december 31 2013', 'december 31 2014'], ['delphi automotive plc ( 1 )', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.98', '$ 179.33', '$ 285.81', '$ 350.82'], ['s&p 500 ( 2 )', '100.00', '100.80', '116.93', '154.80', '175.99'], ['automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )', '100.00', '89.27', '110.41', '166.46', '178.05']]
dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares .the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 .in january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 .in addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .

Question: what is the difference between the highest and lowest return for the first year of the investment?
Answer: 68.92%
Explanation: it is the variation between the maximum and minimum value .