HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
selling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 65.2 million in 2010 from $ 52.9 million in 2009 due primarily to increases in compensation expense and recruitment costs , principally in connection with higher headcount in 2010 , and an increase in non-cash compensation expense for the reasons described above .cost of goods sold cost of goods sold in 2010 and 2009 was $ 2.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies .to date , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers have primarily consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold .other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 2.1 million in 2010 from $ 4.5 million in 2009 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower average balances of , cash and marketable securities .interest expense increased to $ 9.1 million in 2010 from $ 2.3 million in 2009 .interest expense is primarily attributable to the imputed interest portion of payments to our landlord , commencing in the third quarter of 2009 , to lease newly constructed laboratory and office facilities in tarrytown , new york .income tax expense ( benefit ) in 2010 , we did not recognize any income tax expense or benefit .in 2009 , we recognized a $ 4.1 million income tax benefit , consisting primarily of ( i ) $ 2.7 million resulting from a provision in the worker , homeownership , and business assistance act of 2009 that allowed us to claim a refund of u.s .federal alternative minimum tax that we paid in 2008 , and ( ii ) $ 0.7 million resulting from a provision in the american recovery and reinvestment act of 2009 that allowed us to claim a refund for a portion of our unused pre-2006 research tax credits .years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 net loss regeneron reported a net loss of $ 67.8 million , or $ 0.85 per share ( basic and diluted ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , compared to a net loss of $ 79.1 million , or $ 1.00 per share ( basic and diluted ) for 2008 .the decrease in our net loss in 2009 was principally due to higher collaboration revenue in connection with our antibody collaboration with sanofi-aventis , receipt of a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment in connection with our vegf trap-eye collaboration with bayer healthcare , and higher arcalyst ae sales , partly offset by higher research and development expenses , as detailed below .revenues revenues in 2009 and 2008 consist of the following: .
[['( in millions )', '2009', '2008'], ['collaboration revenue', '', ''], ['sanofi-aventis', '$ 247.2', '$ 154.0'], ['bayer healthcare', '67.3', '31.2'], ['total collaboration revenue', '314.5', '185.2'], ['technology licensing revenue', '40.0', '40.0'], ['net product sales', '18.4', '6.3'], ['contract research and other revenue', '6.4', '7.0'], ['total revenue', '$ 379.3', '$ 238.5']]
.

Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2008?
Answer: 14%
we believe that the presentation of adjusted diluted earnings per share , which excludes withdrawal costs 2013 multiemployer pension funds , restructuring charges , loss on extinguishment of debt , and ( gain ) loss on business dispositions and impairments , net , provides an understanding of operational activities before the financial effect of certain items .we use this measure , and believe investors will find it helpful , in understanding the ongoing performance of our operations separate from items that have a disproportionate effect on our results for a particular period .we have incurred comparable charges and costs in prior periods , and similar types of adjustments can reasonably be expected to be recorded in future periods .our definition of adjusted diluted earnings per share may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .property and equipment , net in 2017 , we anticipate receiving approximately $ 975 million of property and equipment , net of proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as follows: .
[['trucks and equipment', '$ 350'], ['landfill', '330'], ['containers', '160'], ['facilities and other', '150'], ['property and equipment received during 2017', '990'], ['proceeds from sales of property and equipment', '-15 ( 15 )'], ['property and equipment received net of proceeds during 2017', '$ 975']]
results of operations revenue we generate revenue primarily from our solid waste collection operations .our remaining revenue is from other services , including transfer station , landfill disposal , recycling , and energy services .our residential and small- container commercial collection operations in some markets are based on long-term contracts with municipalities .certain of our municipal contracts have annual price escalation clauses that are tied to changes in an underlying base index such as a consumer price index .we generally provide small-container commercial and large-container industrial collection services to customers under contracts with terms up to three years .our transfer stations , landfills and , to a lesser extent , our recycling facilities generate revenue from disposal or tipping fees charged to third parties .in general , we integrate our recycling operations with our collection operations and obtain revenue from the sale of recycled commodities .our revenue from energy services consists mainly of fees we charge for the treatment of liquid and solid waste derived from the production of oil and natural gas .other revenue consists primarily of revenue from national accounts , which represents the portion of revenue generated from nationwide or regional contracts in markets outside our operating areas where the associated waste handling services are subcontracted to local operators .consequently , substantially all of this revenue is offset with related subcontract costs , which are recorded in cost of operations. .

Question: as part of the sales proceeds net what was the ratio of trucks and equipment to the containers
Answer: 2.2
Explanation: there is 2.2 trucks and equipment for every container
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel .the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment .we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances .see item 1 .business 2014citadel investment .performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .
[['', '12/02', '12/03', '12/04', '12/05', '12/06', '12/07'], ['e*trade financial corporation', '100.00', '260.29', '307.61', '429.22', '461.32', '73.05'], ['s&p 500', '100.00', '128.68', '142.69', '149.70', '173.34', '182.87'], ['s&p super cap diversified financials', '100.00', '139.29', '156.28', '170.89', '211.13', '176.62']]
2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending december 31 .2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .all rights reserved .www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Question: as of december 2007 what was the ratio of the ratio of the cumulative total return for s&p 500 to the e*trade financial corporation
Answer: 2.5
Explanation: as of december 2007 there was 2.5 times the amount of returns for the s&p 500 to the e*trade financial corporation
12 .brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business .citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices .credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question .citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines .margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required .where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level .exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi .credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive .brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .
[['in millions of dollars', 'december 31 , 2016', 'december 31 , 2015'], ['receivables from customers', '$ 10374', '$ 10435'], ['receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations', '18513', '17248'], ['total brokerage receivables ( 1 )', '$ 28887', '$ 27683'], ['payables to customers', '$ 37237', '$ 35653'], ['payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations', '19915', '18069'], ['total brokerage payables ( 1 )', '$ 57152', '$ 53722']]
payables to brokers , dealers , and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2016 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Answer: .93
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
[['', '2017', '2016'], ['balance beginning of year', '$ 94417', '$ 10258'], ['goodwill acquired as part of acquisition', '2014', '84159'], ['working capital settlement', '-1225 ( 1225 )', '2014'], ['impairment loss', '2014', '2014'], ['balance end of year', '$ 93192', '$ 94417']]
goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .

Question: how much is the goodwill worth in 2016 if the intangible assets are worth $ 31.1 million?
Answer: $ 63.1 million
Explanation: in the first line , it says that the goodwill and intangibles assets for 2016 was $ 94.4 million this means that if the intangible assets was $ 31.3 million . therefore , the goodwill will be 63.1 million
part ii item 5 .market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share .our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt .information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .
[['quarter', 'dividends paid per share 2018', 'dividends paid per share 2017'], ['first', '$ 2.00', '$ 1.82'], ['second', '2.00', '1.82'], ['third', '2.00', '1.82'], ['fourth', '2.20', '2.00'], ['year', '$ 8.20', '$ 7.46']]
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index .the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation .the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .

Question: what is the net change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 0.74
table of contents e*trade | 2016 10-k 24 2022 limits on the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders 2022 the prohibition of stockholder action by written consent 2022 advance notice requirements for nominations to the board or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings in addition , certain provisions of our stock incentive plans , management retention and employment agreements ( including severance payments and stock option acceleration ) , our senior secured credit facility , certain provisions of delaware law and certain provisions of the indentures governing certain series of our debt securities that would require us to offer to purchase such securities at a premium in the event of certain changes in our ownership may also discourage , delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us , which could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock .item 1b .unresolved staff comments item 2 .properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2016 is shown in the following table .square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or space that is part of a facility restructuring. .
[['location', 'approximate square footage'], ['alpharetta georgia', '260000'], ['jersey city new jersey', '109000'], ['arlington virginia', '102000'], ['sandy utah', '85000'], ['menlo park california', '63000'], ['new york new york', '52000'], ['chicago illinois', '37000']]
all facilities are leased at december 31 , 2016 .all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location .in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 regional branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet .item 3 .legal proceedings information in response to this item can be found under the heading legal matters in note 21 2014 commitments , contingencies and other regulatory matters in this annual report and is incorporated by reference into this item .item 4 .mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: at december 312016 what was the ratio of the square footage of alpharetta georgia to jersey city new jersey
Answer: 2.39
Explanation: at december 312016 there was 2.39 square footage of alpharetta georgia for each square foot in jersey city new jersey
stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) .upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased .additionally , in connection with the acquisition of solexa , the company assumed stock options granted under the 2005 solexa equity incentive plan ( the 2005 solexa equity plan ) .as of december 30 , 2007 , an aggregate of up to 13485619 shares of the company 2019s common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2005 stock plan and the 2005 solexa equity plan .the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors .as of december 30 , 2007 , options to purchase 1834384 shares remained available for future grant under the 2005 stock plan and 2005 solexa equity plan .the company 2019s stock option activity under all stock option plans from january 2 , 2005 through december 30 , 2007 is as follows : options weighted- average exercise price .
[['', 'options', 'weighted- average exercise price'], ['outstanding at january 2 2005', '6205020', '$ 6.99'], ['granted', '2992300', '$ 10.02'], ['exercised', '-869925 ( 869925 )', '$ 4.66'], ['cancelled', '-1001964 ( 1001964 )', '$ 11.00'], ['outstanding at january 1 2006', '7325431', '$ 7.96'], ['granted', '2621050', '$ 27.24'], ['exercised', '-1273119 ( 1273119 )', '$ 7.28'], ['cancelled', '-314242 ( 314242 )', '$ 12.44'], ['outstanding at december 31 2006', '8359120', '$ 13.94'], ['options assumed through business combination', '1424332', '$ 21.37'], ['granted', '3784508', '$ 40.64'], ['exercised', '-2179286 ( 2179286 )', '$ 12.06'], ['cancelled', '-964740 ( 964740 )', '$ 22.38'], ['outstanding at december 30 2007', '10423934', '$ 24.26']]
illumina , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the total value of granted options in 2006 , in millions?
Answer: 71.4
notes to consolidated financial statements the firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and , accordingly , does not accrue any u.s .income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $ 3.75 billion and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , attributable to reinvested earnings of $ 21.69 billion and $ 20.63 billion , respectively .unrecognized tax benefits the firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position .a position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized on settlement .a liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , the accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $ 374 million and $ 233 million , respectively .the firm recognized $ 95 million , $ 21 million and $ 28 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change .the table below presents the changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits .this liability is included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 17 for further information. .
[['in millions', 'as of december 2012', 'as of december 2011', 'as of december 2010'], ['balance beginning of year', '$ 1887', '$ 2081', '$ 1925'], ['increases based on tax positions related to the current year', '190', '171', '171'], ['increases based on tax positions related to prior years', '336', '278', '162'], ['decreases related to tax positions of prior years', '-109 ( 109 )', '-41 ( 41 )', '-104 ( 104 )'], ['decreases related to settlements', '-35 ( 35 )', '-638 ( 638 )', '-128 ( 128 )'], ['acquisitions/ ( dispositions )', '-47 ( 47 )', '47', '56'], ['exchange rate fluctuations', '15', '-11 ( 11 )', '-1 ( 1 )'], ['balance end of year', '$ 2237', '$ 1887', '$ 2081'], ['related deferred income tax asset1', '685', '569', '972'], ['net unrecognized tax benefit2', '$ 1552', '$ 1318', '$ 1109']]
related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 .included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 .2 .if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate .194 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2011 compare to 2010?
Answer: 18.8%