HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) provide renewal options for terms of 3 to 7 additional years .leases for retail space are for terms of 5 to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options .as of september 29 , 2007 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 1.1 billion related to leases for retail space .rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 151 million , $ 138 million , and $ 140 million in 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2007 , are as follows ( in millions ) : fiscal years .
[['2008', '$ 155'], ['2009', '172'], ['2010', '173'], ['2011', '160'], ['2012', '148'], ['thereafter', '617'], ['total minimum lease payments', '$ 1425']]
accrued warranty and indemnifications the company offers a basic limited parts and labor warranty on its hardware products .the basic warranty period for hardware products is typically one year from the date of purchase by the end-user .the company also offers a 90-day basic warranty for its service parts used to repair the company 2019s hardware products .the company provides currently for the estimated cost that may be incurred under its basic limited product warranties at the time related revenue is recognized .factors considered in determining appropriate accruals for product warranty obligations include the size of the installed base of products subject to warranty protection , historical and projected warranty claim rates , historical and projected cost-per-claim , and knowledge of specific product failures that are outside of the company 2019s typical experience .the company assesses the adequacy of its preexisting warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates .for products accounted for under subscription accounting pursuant to sop no .97-2 , the company recognizes warranty expense as incurred .the company periodically provides updates to its applications and system software to maintain the software 2019s compliance with specifications .the estimated cost to develop such updates is accounted for as warranty costs that are recognized at the time related software revenue is recognized .factors considered in determining appropriate accruals related to such updates include the number of units delivered , the number of updates expected to occur , and the historical cost and estimated future cost of the resources necessary to develop these updates. .

Question: what is the range between the shortest and longest length of leases for retail space , in years?
Answer: 15
republic services , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc .2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc .2006 incentive stock plan ( the 2006 plan ) ) .allied 2019s shareholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 .the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect republic as the new sponsor of the plan , and that any references to shares of common stock are to shares of common stock of republic , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the allied acquisition .the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provided for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards .awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the allied acquisition .no further awards will be made under the 2006 stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants .we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier .expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option .the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option .we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options .when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $ 5.74 , $ 5.27 and $ 4.77 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .
[['', '2014', '2013', '2012'], ['expected volatility', '27.5% ( 27.5 % )', '28.9% ( 28.9 % )', '27.8% ( 27.8 % )'], ['risk-free interest rate', '1.4% ( 1.4 % )', '0.7% ( 0.7 % )', '0.8% ( 0.8 % )'], ['dividend yield', '3.2% ( 3.2 % )', '3.2% ( 3.2 % )', '3.2% ( 3.2 % )'], ['expected life ( in years )', '4.6', '4.5', '4.5'], ['contractual life ( in years )', '7.0', '7.0', '7.0']]
.

Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013
Answer: 3.95%
Explanation: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million .the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio .cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period .the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days .these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio .during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures .other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period .the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors .debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .
[['( in millions )', 'one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread'], ['december 31 2012', '$ 34'], ['december 31 2011', '35']]
economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices .the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .

Question: what was the percentage change in the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread from 2011 to 2012
Answer: -2.86%
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2007 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .
[['balance december 31 2004', '$ 595338'], ['additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense', '83656'], ['deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property', '-15244 ( 15244 )'], ['balance december 31 2005', '$ 663750'], ['additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense', '89564'], ['deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property', '-12807 ( 12807 )'], ['balance december 31 2006', '$ 740507'], ['additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense', '96454'], ['deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property', '-80258 ( 80258 )'], ['balance december 31 2007', '$ 756703']]
.

Question: what is the increase in the deductions during 2006 and 2007 , in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 67451
Explanation: it is the difference between those deduction values .
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .
[['company/index', 'december 31 , 2010', 'december 31 , 2011', 'december 31 , 2012', 'december 31 , 2013', 'december 31 , 2014', 'december 31 , 2015'], ["o'reilly automotive inc .", '$ 100', '$ 132', '$ 148', '$ 213', '$ 319', '$ 419'], ['s&p 500 retail index', '100', '103', '128', '185', '203', '252'], ['s&p 500', '$ 100', '$ 100', '$ 113', '$ 147', '$ 164', '$ 163']]
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in the o'reilly automotive inc . from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 32%
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc .class b common stock and the walt disney company .the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 .december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
[['', 'december 312008', 'december 312009', 'december 312010', 'december 312011', 'december 312012'], ['disca', '$ 102.53', '$ 222.09', '$ 301.96', '$ 296.67', '$ 459.67'], ['discb', '$ 78.53', '$ 162.82', '$ 225.95', '$ 217.56', '$ 327.11'], ['disck', '$ 83.69', '$ 165.75', '$ 229.31', '$ 235.63', '$ 365.63'], ['s&p 500', '$ 74.86', '$ 92.42', '$ 104.24', '$ 104.23', '$ 118.21'], ['peer group', '$ 68.79', '$ 100.70', '$ 121.35', '$ 138.19', '$ 190.58']]
equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: by what percent did the c series outperform the s&p 500 over 5 years?
Answer: 209%
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .the firm is a component of all three industry indices .the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .
[['december 31 ( in dollars )', '2013', '2014', '2015', '2016', '2017', '2018'], ['jpmorgan chase', '$ 100.00', '$ 109.88', '$ 119.07', '$ 160.23', '$ 203.07', '$ 189.57'], ['kbw bank index', '100.00', '109.36', '109.90', '141.23', '167.49', '137.82'], ['s&p financial index', '100.00', '115.18', '113.38', '139.17', '169.98', '147.82'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '113.68', '115.24', '129.02', '157.17', '150.27']]
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what was the average uncompounded annual return for jpmorgan chase for the five year period?
Answer: 37.9%
3 .dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : .
[['', '2003', '2002', '2001'], ['subsidiaries', '$ 807', '$ 771', '$ 1038'], ['affiliates', '43', '44', '21']]
4 .guarantees and letters of credit guarantees 2014in connection with certain of its project financing , acquisition , and power purchase agreements , the company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments , most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events .these obligations and commitments , excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below , were limited as of december 31 , 2003 , by the terms of the agreements , to an aggregate of approximately $ 515 million representing 55 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 100 million .of this amount , $ 147 million represents credit enhancements for non-recourse debt , and $ 38 million commitments to fund its equity in projects currently under development or in construction .letters of credit 2014at december 31 , 2003 , the company had $ 89 million in letters of credit outstanding representing 9 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 36 million , which operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and subsidiary operations .the company pays a letter of credit fee ranging from 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) to 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) per annum on the outstanding amounts .in addition , the company had $ 4 million in surety bonds outstanding at december 31 , 2003. .

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2002?
Answer: 17.5
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period .the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends .the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies .comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .
[['', '2007', '2008', '2009', '2010', '2011', '2012'], ['state street corporation', '$ 100', '$ 49', '$ 55', '$ 58', '$ 52', '$ 61'], ['s&p 500 index', '100', '63', '80', '92', '94', '109'], ['s&p financial index', '100', '45', '52', '59', '49', '63']]
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in state street corporation from 2007 to 2009?
Answer: -45.0%
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel .the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment .we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances .see item 1 .business 2014citadel investment .performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .
[['', '12/02', '12/03', '12/04', '12/05', '12/06', '12/07'], ['e*trade financial corporation', '100.00', '260.29', '307.61', '429.22', '461.32', '73.05'], ['s&p 500', '100.00', '128.68', '142.69', '149.70', '173.34', '182.87'], ['s&p super cap diversified financials', '100.00', '139.29', '156.28', '170.89', '211.13', '176.62']]
2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending december 31 .2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .all rights reserved .www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between e*trade financial corporation and s&p super cap diversified financials for the five years ended 12/07?
Answer: 103.57%
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively .for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material .the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method .merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method .under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level .costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory .the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 .current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method .the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger .the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 .in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs .increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases .the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary .on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time .store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred .property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost .the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .
[['land improvements', '20'], ['buildings', '39-40'], ['furniture fixtures and equipment', '3-10']]
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the excess of current cost over lifo cost from 2008 to 2009 .
Answer: 720%
Explanation: the percentage change is the change from the recent to the most recent divide by the recent
subject to fluctuation and , consequently , the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may differ significantly from its current reported value .fluctuations in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the issuer , the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions .the table below summarizes equity investments that are subject to equity price fluctuations at december 31 , 2012 .equity investments are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets .( in millions ) carrying unrealized net of tax .
[['( in millions )', 'costbasis', 'fairvalue', 'carryingvalue', 'unrealizedgainnet of tax'], ['bm&fbovespa s.a .', '$ 262.9', '$ 690.6', '$ 690.6', '$ 271.4'], ['bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v .', '17.3', '29.3', '29.3', '7.6'], ['imarex asa', '2014', '1.8', '1.8', '1.1']]
we do not currently hedge against equity price risk .equity investments are assessed for other-than- temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. .

Question: in 2012 what was the ratio of the bm&fbovespa s.a . fair value to the cost basis
Answer: 2.63