table of contents finance lease obligations the company has a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 164000 square feet located in alajuela , costa rica , to be used as a manufacturing and office facility .the company was responsible for a significant portion of the construction costs , and in accordance with asc 840 , leases , subsection 40-15-5 , the company was deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period .the building was completed in fiscal 2008 , and the company has recorded the fair market value of the building and land of $ 15.1 million within property and equipment on its consolidated balance sheets .at september 24 , 2011 , the company has recorded $ 1.6 million in accrued expenses and $ 16.9 million in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet .the term of the lease , which commenced in may 2008 , is for a period of approximately ten years with the option to extend for two consecutive 5-year terms .at the completion of the construction period , the company reviewed the lease for potential sale-leaseback treatment in accordance with asc 840 , subsection 40 , sale-leaseback transactions .based on its analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment .therefore , the building , leasehold improvements and associated liabilities remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the building and leasehold improvements are being depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 35 years .future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 24 , 2011: .
[['fiscal 2012', '$ 1616'], ['fiscal 2013', '1672'], ['fiscal 2014', '1731'], ['fiscal 2015', '1791'], ['fiscal 2016', '1854'], ['thereafter', '3643'], ['total minimum payments', '12307'], ['less-amount representing interest', '-4017 ( 4017 )'], ['total', '$ 8290']]
the company also has to a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 146000 square feet located in marlborough , massachusetts , to be principally used as an additional manufacturing facility .as part of the lease agreement , the lessor agreed to allow the company to make significant renovations to the facility to prepare the facility for the company 2019s manufacturing needs .the company was responsible for a significant amount of the construction costs and therefore in accordance with asc 840-40-15-5 was deemed to be the owner of the building during the construction period .the $ 13.2 million fair market value of the facility is included within property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet .at september 24 , 2011 , the company has recorded $ 1.0 million in accrued expenses and $ 15.9 million in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet .the term of the lease is for a period of approximately 12 years commencing on november 14 , 2006 with the option to extend for two consecutive 5-year terms .based on its asc 840-40 analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment .therefore , the improvements and associated liabilities will remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the leasehold improvements are being depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of up to 35 years .source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .

Question: what percent of future minimum lease payments are projected to be paid off in 2016?
Answer: 22.4%
Explanation: to find the percent of future minimum lease payments one must divide the projected payments in 2016 by the total amount of payments