HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
entergy new orleans , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2006 net revenue', '$ 192.2'], ['fuel recovery', '42.6'], ['volume/weather', '25.6'], ['rider revenue', '8.5'], ['net wholesale revenue', '-41.2 ( 41.2 )'], ['other', '3.3'], ['2007 net revenue', '$ 231.0']]
the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 .in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) .the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina .entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) .the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina .in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .

Question: what percent of the net change in revenue between 2006 and 2007 was due to fuel recovery?
Answer: 109%
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .redeemable noncontrolling interests - continued redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period .changes in the value from period to period are charged to 201cadditional capital 201d in our consolidated statements of changes in equity .below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests .( amounts in thousands ) .
[['balance at december 31 2008', '$ 1177978'], ['net income', '25120'], ['distributions', '-42451 ( 42451 )'], ['conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value', '-90955 ( 90955 )'], ['adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value', '167049'], ['other net', '14887'], ['balance at december 31 2009', '$ 1251628'], ['net income', '55228'], ['distributions', '-53515 ( 53515 )'], ['conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value', '-126764 ( 126764 )'], ['adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value', '191826'], ['redemption of series d-12 redeemable units', '-13000 ( 13000 )'], ['other net', '22571'], ['balance at december 31 2010', '$ 1327974']]
as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the aggregate redemption value of redeemable class a units was $ 1066974000 and $ 971628000 , respectively .redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our series g convertible preferred units and series d-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units , as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with asc 480 , distinguishing liabilities and equity , because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of vornado common shares .accordingly the fair value of these units is included as a component of 201cother liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $ 55097000 and $ 60271000 as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the redeemable non controlling interests balance at december 31 2009 from 2008
Answer: 6.3%
s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s .dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .
[['for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars )', 'direct amount', 'ceded to other companies', 'assumed from other companies', 'net amount', 'percentage of amount assumed to net'], ['2008', '$ 16087', '$ 6144', '$ 3260', '$ 13203', '25% ( 25 % )'], ['2007', '$ 14673', '$ 5834', '$ 3458', '$ 12297', '28% ( 28 % )'], ['2006', '$ 13562', '$ 5198', '$ 3461', '$ 11825', '29% ( 29 % )']]
.

Question: in 2008 what was the ratio of the direct amount to the amount ceded to other companies
Answer: 2.62
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .
[['', '12/31/2010', '12/31/2011', '12/31/2012', '12/31/2013', '12/31/2014', '12/31/2015'], ['united parcel service inc .', '$ 100.00', '$ 103.88', '$ 107.87', '$ 158.07', '$ 171.77', '$ 160.61'], ['standard & poor 2019s 500 index', '$ 100.00', '$ 102.11', '$ 118.43', '$ 156.77', '$ 178.22', '$ 180.67'], ['dow jones transportation average', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.01', '$ 107.49', '$ 151.97', '$ 190.08', '$ 158.23']]
.

Question: what was the percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . for the five year period ending 12/31/2015?
Answer: 60.61%
table of contents performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500" ) and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2013 to december 31 , 2018. .
[['', '12/13', '12/14', '12/15', '12/16', '12/17', '12/18'], ['royal caribbean cruises ltd .', '100.00', '176.94', '220.72', '182.99', '271.25', '227.46'], ['s&p 500', '100.00', '113.69', '115.26', '129.05', '157.22', '150.33'], ['dow jones u.s . travel & leisure', '100.00', '116.37', '123.23', '132.56', '164.13', '154.95']]
the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested .past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the royal caribbean cruises ltd . performance from 2014 to 2015
Answer: 24.7%
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .the firm is a component of all three industry indices .the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .
[['december 31 ( in dollars )', '2013', '2014', '2015', '2016', '2017', '2018'], ['jpmorgan chase', '$ 100.00', '$ 109.88', '$ 119.07', '$ 160.23', '$ 203.07', '$ 189.57'], ['kbw bank index', '100.00', '109.36', '109.90', '141.23', '167.49', '137.82'], ['s&p financial index', '100.00', '115.18', '113.38', '139.17', '169.98', '147.82'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '113.68', '115.24', '129.02', '157.17', '150.27']]
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what is the estimated variation between the percentual decrease observed in the s&p 500 index and in the jpmorgan chase during the years 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 2.3%
Explanation: its the difference between the percentual variations of each indices during 2017 and 2018 .
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 .the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards .at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items .the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period .valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability .the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations .the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period .accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions .based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized .the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses .total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized .at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion .if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .
[['years ended december 31,', 'federal', 'state', 'foreign'], ['2011 to 2015', '$ 2014', '$ 2014', '$ 503'], ['2016 to 2020', '2014', '331315', '5509'], ['2021 to 2025', '774209', '576780', '2014'], ['2026 to 2030', '423398', '279908', '92412'], ['total', '$ 1197607', '$ 1188003', '$ 98424']]
in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .

Question: at december 2010 what was the percent of the losses related to employee stock options included in the net federal operating loss carry forwards
Answer: 25%
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .
[['', 'shares ( thous. )', 'weighted-averagegrant-date fair value'], ['nonvested at january 1 2009', '873', '$ 50.70'], ['granted', '449', '47.28'], ['vested', '-240 ( 240 )', '43.23'], ['forfeited', '-22 ( 22 )', '53.86'], ['nonvested at december 31 2009', '1060', '$ 50.88']]
at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years .a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants .5 .retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans .qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements .other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees .these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses .the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 .funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability .the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets .the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases .the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases .plan assets are measured at fair value .we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Question: at december 31 , 2009 , what was the remaining compensation expense per share for the unvested awards?
Answer: 20.75
entergy mississippi , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi .gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs .other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider .2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2006 net revenue', '$ 466.1'], ['base revenue', '7.9'], ['volume/weather', '4.5'], ['transmission revenue', '4.1'], ['transmission equalization', '4.0'], ['reserve equalization', '3.8'], ['attala costs', '-10.2 ( 10.2 )'], ['other', '6.7'], ['2007 net revenue', '$ 486.9']]
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 .billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh .the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector .the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 .the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies .the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Question: what percent of the change in revenue was due to volume/weather?
Answer: 35%
item 1a .risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities .if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly .risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses .prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio .although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future .there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years .such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings .our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events .we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism .any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations .by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of reinsurance , were as follows: .
[['calendar year:', 'pre-tax catastrophe losses'], ['( dollars in millions )', ''], ['2017', '$ 1472.6'], ['2016', '301.2'], ['2015', '53.8'], ['2014', '56.3'], ['2013', '194.0']]
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections .we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool .we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area .these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: what was the change pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2016 to 2017 in thousands
Answer: 1171.4