table of contents rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 645 million , $ 488 million and $ 338 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2013 , are as follows ( in millions ) : other commitments as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion .in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , which consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations .contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated .in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies .however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain .therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected .apple inc .v .samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al .on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics co. , ltd and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division .on march 1 , 2013 , the district court upheld $ 599 million of the jury 2019s award and ordered a new trial as to the remainder .because the award is subject to entry of final judgment , partial re-trial and appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its results of operations .virnetx , inc .v .apple inc .et al .on august 11 , 2010 , virnetx , inc .filed an action against the company alleging that certain of its products infringed on four patents relating to network communications technology .on november 6 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict against the company , and awarded damages of $ 368 million .the company is challenging the verdict , believes it has valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time. .
[['2014', '$ 610'], ['2015', '613'], ['2016', '587'], ['2017', '551'], ['2018', '505'], ['thereafter', '1855'], ['total minimum lease payments', '$ 4721']]
.

Question: why is the information relative to 2012 costs incorrect and what would the correct information be?
Answer: in 2012 , apple lost a lawsuit against virnetx , inc . which they believe it has no valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time . therefore they never accounted the losses in 2012 and their total for 2012 should be 856 million
Explanation: apple has not taken the losses for the virnet.inc lawsuit because it requested a retrial . this means that the lease expensive for that year are incorrect and should be 856 million .