HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .
[['date', 'pmi', 'pmi peer group ( 1 )', 's&p 500 index'], ['december 31 2012', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00'], ['december 31 2013', '$ 108.50', '$ 122.80', '$ 132.40'], ['december 31 2014', '$ 106.20', '$ 132.50', '$ 150.50'], ['december 31 2015', '$ 120.40', '$ 143.50', '$ 152.60'], ['december 31 2016', '$ 130.80', '$ 145.60', '$ 170.80'], ['december 31 2017', '$ 156.80', '$ 172.70', '$ 208.10']]
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc .was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c .on july 25 , 2017 .the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
Answer: -51.3%
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending may 31 .global payments s&p 500 information technology .
[['', 'global payments', 's&p 500', 's&p information technology'], ['may 31 2002', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00'], ['may 31 2003', '94.20', '91.94', '94.48'], ['may 31 2004', '129.77', '108.79', '115.24'], ['may 31 2005', '193.30', '117.75', '116.29'], ['may 31 2006', '260.35', '127.92', '117.14'], ['may 31 2007', '224.24', '157.08', '144.11']]
issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million .the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit .there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization .no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?
Answer: -5.8%
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s .technology index .the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s .technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 .data points on the graph are annual .note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc .s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending september 30 .copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .all rights reserved .september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .
[['', 'september 30 2007', 'september 30 2008', 'september 30 2009', 'september 30 2010', 'september 30 2011', 'september 30 2012'], ['apple inc .', '$ 100', '$ 74', '$ 121', '$ 185', '$ 248', '$ 437'], ['s&p 500', '$ 100', '$ 78', '$ 73', '$ 80', '$ 81', '$ 105'], ['s&p computer hardware', '$ 100', '$ 84', '$ 99', '$ 118', '$ 134', '$ 214'], ['dow jones us technology', '$ 100', '$ 76', '$ 85', '$ 95', '$ 98', '$ 127']]
.

Question: what was the cumulative total return on apple stock between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
Answer: 337
as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through june 2011 .these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years .as of december 31 , 2006 , annual future minimum payments under these operating leases were as follows ( in thousands ) : .
[['2007', '5320'], ['2008', '5335'], ['2009', '5075'], ['2010', '4659'], ['2011', '4712'], ['2012 and thereafter', '12798'], ['total', '$ 37899']]
rent expense , net of amortization of the deferred gain on sale of property , was $ 4723041 , $ 4737218 , and $ 1794234 for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 , respectively .6 .stockholders 2019 equity common stock as of december 31 , 2006 , the company had 46857512 shares of common stock outstanding , of which 4814744 shares were sold to employees and consultants subject to restricted stock agreements .the restricted common shares vest in accordance with the provisions of the agreements , generally over five years .all unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the company at the original purchase price .as of december 31 , 2006 , 36000 shares of common stock were subject to repurchase .in addition , the company also issued 12000 shares for a restricted stock award to an employee under the company 2019s new 2005 stock and incentive plan based on service performance .these shares vest monthly over a three-year period .stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) .upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased .the 2005 stock plan provides that an aggregate of up to 11542358 shares of the company 2019s common stock be reserved and available to be issued .in addition , the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors .illumina , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what percentage of annual future minimum payments under operating leases are due in 2008?
Answer: 14%
and penalties , resulting in a liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 .in 2017 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 1 million for interest and penalties , resulting in no material liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017 .the 2017 changes in interest and penalties related to statute of limitation expirations .in 2016 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 2 million for interest and penalties , resulting in a total liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016 .the 2016 changes in interest and penalties related to reductions in prior year tax positions and settlement with a taxing authority .the following table summarizes the tax years that are either currently under examination or remain open under the applicable statute of limitations and subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which the company operates: .
[['jurisdiction united states ( 1 )', 'jurisdiction 2011', 'jurisdiction -', '2017'], ['connecticut', '2016', '-', '2017'], ['mississippi', '2012', '-', '2017'], ['virginia ( 1 )', '2011', '-', '2017']]
virginia ( 1 ) 2011 - 2017 ( 1 ) the 2014 tax year has been closed in these jurisdictions .although the company believes it has adequately provided for all uncertain tax positions , amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than the company's accrued position .accordingly , additional provisions for federal and state income tax related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are effectively settled or otherwise resolved .conversely , the company could settle positions with the tax authorities for amounts lower than have been accrued .the company believes that it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months the company's liability for uncertain tax positions may decrease by $ 14 million due to resolution of a federal uncertain tax position .during 2013 the company entered into the pre-compliance assurance process with the irs for years 2011 and 2012 .the company is part of the irs compliance assurance process program for the 2014 through 2018 tax years .open tax years related to state jurisdictions remain subject to examination .deferred income taxes - deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and for income tax purposes .as described above , deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated as of the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates expected to be in effect when the deferred tax items reverse in future periods .as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) under the tax act , the company revalued its net deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2017 .net deferred tax assets are classified as long-term deferred tax assets in the consolidated statements of financial position. .

Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017?
Answer: 0
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit .the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2010 net revenue', '$ 1043.7'], ['mark-to-market tax settlement sharing', '-195.9 ( 195.9 )'], ['retail electric price', '32.5'], ['volume/weather', '11.6'], ['other', '-5.7 ( 5.7 )'], ['2011 net revenue', '$ 886.2']]
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 .see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Answer: 15.1%
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 .leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases .most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance .office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs .shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance .shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales .as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .
[['2012', '$ 1807885'], ['2013', '1718403'], ['2014', '1609279'], ['2015', '1425804'], ['2016', '1232154'], ['thereafter', '6045584']]
these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales .these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 .former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations .on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop .stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent .on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) .as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .

Question: percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales totaled how much for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , in thousands?
Answer: 16394000
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively .this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance .the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 .our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc .our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds .in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group .cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .
[['', '12/2007', '12/2008', '12/2009', '12/2010', '12/2011', '12/2012'], ['valero common stock', '$ 100.00', '$ 31.45', '$ 25.09', '$ 35.01', '$ 32.26', '$ 53.61'], ['s&p 500', '100.00', '63.00', '79.67', '91.67', '93.61', '108.59'], ['old peer group', '100.00', '80.98', '76.54', '88.41', '104.33', '111.11'], ['new peer group', '100.00', '66.27', '86.87', '72.84', '74.70', '76.89']]
____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 .201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .

Question: what was the percentage growth of the s&p 500 common stock from 2007 to 2012
Answer: 8.59%
apple inc .| 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 .the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 .note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .* $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes .copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial .all rights reserved .copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co .all rights reserved .september september september september september september .
[['', 'september2011', 'september2012', 'september2013', 'september2014', 'september2015', 'september2016'], ['apple inc .', '$ 100', '$ 166', '$ 123', '$ 183', '$ 212', '$ 213'], ['s&p 500 index', '$ 100', '$ 130', '$ 155', '$ 186', '$ 185', '$ 213'], ['s&p information technology index', '$ 100', '$ 132', '$ 142', '$ 183', '$ 187', '$ 230'], ['dow jones u.s . technology supersector index', '$ 100', '$ 130', '$ 137', '$ 178', '$ 177', '$ 217']]
.

Question: what is the 6 year return of the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index?
Answer: 117%
.
[['years ended december 31', '2018', '2017', '2016'], ['statutory tax rate', '19.0% ( 19.0 % )', '19.3% ( 19.3 % )', '20.0% ( 20.0 % )'], ['u.s . state income taxes net of u.s . federal benefit', '-0.4 ( 0.4 )', '-1.5 ( 1.5 )', '0.4'], ['taxes on international operations ( 1 )', '-7.3 ( 7.3 )', '-30.3 ( 30.3 )', '-12.2 ( 12.2 )'], ['nondeductible expenses', '2.7', '3.4', '1.4'], ['adjustments to prior year tax requirements', '0.9', '2.0', '-1.2 ( 1.2 )'], ['adjustments to valuation allowances', '3.8', '-1.8 ( 1.8 )', '-2.2 ( 2.2 )'], ['change in uncertain tax positions', '0.9', '1.6', '3.2'], ['excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation ( 2 )', '-3.6 ( 3.6 )', '-8.0 ( 8.0 )', '2014'], ['u.s . tax reform impact ( 3 )', '7.1', '51.2', '2014'], ['loss on disposition', '-10.2 ( 10.2 )', '2014', '2014'], ['other 2014 net', '-1.2 ( 1.2 )', '0.6', '1.2'], ['effective tax rate', '11.7% ( 11.7 % )', '36.5% ( 36.5 % )', '10.6% ( 10.6 % )']]
( 1 ) the company determines the adjustment for taxes on international operations based on the difference between the statutory tax rate applicable to earnings in each foreign jurisdiction and the enacted rate of 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) , 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) and 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively .the benefit to the company 2019s effective income tax rate from taxes on international operations relates to benefits from lower-taxed global operations , primarily due to the use of global funding structures and the tax holiday in singapore .the impact decreased from 2017 to 2018 primarily as a result of the decrease in the u.s .federal tax ( 2 ) with the adoption of asu 2016-09 in 2017 , excess tax benefits and deficiencies from share-based payment transactions are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income .( 3 ) the impact of the tax reform act including the transition tax , the re-measurement of u.s .deferred tax assets and liabilities from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , withholding tax accruals , and the allocation of tax benefit between continuing operations and discontinued operations related to utilization of foreign tax credits. .

Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
Answer: -7.3
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .
[['2008', '$ 317'], ['2009', '275'], ['2010', '236'], ['2011', '214'], ['2012', '191'], ['later years', '597'], ['total minimum payments required', '$ 1830']]
aon corporation .

Question: what is the decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 42
Explanation: it is the difference between those values .