HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index .the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 .
[['company/index', 'december 31 2011', 'december 29 2012', 'december 28 2013', 'january 3 2015', 'january 2 2016', 'december 31 2016'], ['advance auto parts', '$ 100.00', '$ 102.87', '$ 158.46', '$ 228.88', '$ 217.49', '$ 244.64'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '114.07', '152.98', '174.56', '177.01', '198.18'], ['s&p retail index', '100.00', '122.23', '178.55', '196.06', '245.31', '256.69']]
.

Question: what is the rate of return on an investment in s&p500 index from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 1.4%
during the third quarter ended 30 june 2017 , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 145.3 and an intangible asset impairment charge of $ 16.8 associated with our lasa reporting unit .refer to note 11 , goodwill , and note 12 , intangible assets , for more information related to these charges and the associated fair value measurement methods and significant inputs/assumptions , which were classified as level 3 since unobservable inputs were utilized in the fair value measurements .16 .debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2019 and 2018 : total debt .
[['30 september', '2019', '2018'], ['short-term borrowings', '$ 58.2', '$ 54.3'], ['current portion of long-term debt ( a ) ( b )', '40.4', '406.6'], ['long-term debt', '2907.3', '2967.4'], ['long-term debt 2013 related party ( b )', '320.1', '384.3'], ['total debt', '$ 3326.0', '$ 3812.6']]
( a ) fiscal year 2019 includes the current portion of long-term debt owed to a related party of $ 37.8 .( b ) refer to note 7 , acquisitions , for additional information regarding related party debt .short-term borrowings short-term borrowings consisted of bank obligations of $ 58.2 and $ 54.3 at 30 september 2019 and 2018 , respectively .the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2019 and 2018 was 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , respectively. .

Question: what is the short-term debt as a percent of long-term debt , in 2019?
Answer: 1.80%
Explanation: it is the short-term debt divided by the long-term debt ( the sum of both long-term debts ) , then turned into a percentage .
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
[['', '2017', '2016'], ['balance beginning of year', '$ 94417', '$ 10258'], ['goodwill acquired as part of acquisition', '2014', '84159'], ['working capital settlement', '-1225 ( 1225 )', '2014'], ['impairment loss', '2014', '2014'], ['balance end of year', '$ 93192', '$ 94417']]
goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .

Question: what was the ratio of the goodwill and other intangible assets for the company had approximately in 2017 to 2016
Answer: 0.989
entergy mississippi , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue .2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2007 net revenue', '$ 486.9'], ['attala costs', '9.9'], ['rider revenue', '6.0'], ['base revenue', '5.1'], ['reserve equalization', '-2.4 ( 2.4 )'], ['net wholesale revenue', '-4.0 ( 4.0 )'], ['other', '-2.7 ( 2.7 )'], ['2008 net revenue', '$ 498.8']]
the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider .the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes .the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below .the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 .the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income .the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 2.4%
the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher costs resulting from the grand gulf uprate .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effects of more favorable weather on residential sales and an increase in industrial sales primarily due to growth in the refining segment .the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to : 2022 the deferral of increased capacity costs that will be recovered through fuel adjustment clauses ; 2022 the expiration of the evangeline gas contract on january 1 , 2013 ; and 2022 an adjustment to deferred fuel costs recorded in the third quarter 2012 in accordance with a rate order from the puct issued in september 2012 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of this puct order issued in entergy texas's 2011 rate case .the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred since march 2010 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso rto .the decommissioning trusts variance is primarily due to lower regulatory credits resulting from higher realized income on decommissioning trust fund investments .there is no effect on net income as the credits are offset by interest and investment income .entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2012 net revenue', '$ 1854'], ['mark-to-market', '-58 ( 58 )'], ['nuclear volume', '-24 ( 24 )'], ['nuclear fuel expenses', '-20 ( 20 )'], ['nuclear realized price changes', '58'], ['other', '-8 ( 8 )'], ['2013 net revenue', '$ 1802']]
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 52 million in 2013 primarily due to : 2022 the effect of rising forward power prices on electricity derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges , including additional financial power sales conducted in the fourth quarter 2013 to offset the planned exercise of in-the-money protective call options and to lock in margins .these additional sales did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment , and increases in forward prices after those sales were made accounted for the majority of the negative mark-to-market variance .it is expected that the underlying transactions will result in earnings in first quarter 2014 as these positions settle .see note 16 to the financial statements for discussion of derivative instruments ; 2022 the decrease in net revenue compared to prior year resulting from the exercise of resupply options provided for in purchase power agreements where entergy wholesale commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running .amounts related to the exercise of resupply options are included in the gwh billed in the table below ; and entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities during 2013?
Answer: -52
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters .the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 .the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty .the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above .the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property .as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively .the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) .
[['2018', '$ 27000'], ['2019', '63000'], ['2020', '25000'], ['2021', '86250'], ['2022', '2014'], ['2023 and thereafter', '600000'], ['total scheduled maturities of long term debt', '$ 801250'], ['current maturities of long term debt', '$ 27000']]
interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities .amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .7 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .

Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 31%
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 .the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .$ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .
[['', '2009', '2010', '2011', '2012', '2013'], ['masco', '$ 128.21', '$ 120.32', '$ 102.45', '$ 165.80', '$ 229.59'], ['s&p 500 index', '$ 125.92', '$ 144.58', '$ 147.60', '$ 171.04', '$ 225.85'], ['s&p industrials index', '$ 120.19', '$ 151.89', '$ 150.97', '$ 173.87', '$ 243.73'], ['s&p consumer durables & apparel index', '$ 136.29', '$ 177.91', '$ 191.64', '$ 232.84', '$ 316.28']]
in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares .during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards .we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: what was the percent of the remaining authorization to repurchase of the 2007 authorized the purchase at december 2013
Answer: 45.2%
Explanation: as of december 2013 , the remaining authorization to repurchase of the 2007 authorized the purchase was 45.2%
synopsys , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) and other electronic applications markets .the company believes the acquisition will expand its technology portfolio , channel reach and total addressable market by adding complementary products and expertise for fpga solutions and rapid asic prototyping .purchase price .synopsys paid $ 8.00 per share for all outstanding shares including certain vested options of synplicity for an aggregate cash payment of $ 223.3 million .additionally , synopsys assumed certain employee stock options and restricted stock units , collectively called 201cstock awards . 201d the total purchase consideration consisted of: .
[['', '( in thousands )'], ['cash paid net of cash acquired', '$ 180618'], ['fair value of assumed vested or earned stock awards', '4169'], ['acquisition related costs', '8016'], ['total purchase price consideration', '$ 192803']]
acquisition related costs consist primarily of professional services , severance and employee related costs and facilities closure costs of which $ 6.8 million have been paid as of october 31 , 2009 .fair value of stock awards assumed .an aggregate of 4.7 million shares of synplicity stock options and restricted stock units were exchanged for synopsys stock options and restricted stock units at an exchange ratio of 0.3392 per share .the fair value of stock options assumed was determined using a black-scholes valuation model .the fair value of stock awards vested or earned of $ 4.2 million was included as part of the purchase price .the fair value of unvested awards of $ 5.0 million will be recorded as operating expense over the remaining service periods on a straight-line basis .purchase price allocation .the company allocated $ 80.0 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets to be amortized over two to seven years .in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 4.8 million .goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 120.3 million and will not be amortized .goodwill primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of cost synergies and sales growth from the integration of synplicity 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations to provide an expansion of products and market reach .fiscal 2007 acquisitions during fiscal year 2007 , the company completed certain purchase acquisitions for cash .the company allocated the total purchase considerations of $ 54.8 million ( which included acquisition related costs of $ 1.4 million ) to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 36.6 million .acquired identifiable intangible assets of $ 14.3 million are being amortized over two to nine years .in-process research and development expense related to these acquisitions was $ 3.2 million. .

Question: what percentage of the total purchase price consideration is represented by goodwill?
Answer: 62%
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 2 .summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) interim periods therein .the new guidance can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of the change recognized at the date of the initial application .the company is currently assessing the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements , and has not yet selected a transition method .3 .change in accounting principle effective january 1 , 2014 , the company changed its method of accounting for certain intellectual property litigation expenses related to the defense and enforcement of its issued patents .previously , the company capitalized these legal costs if a favorable outcome in the patent defense was determined to be probable , and amortized the capitalized legal costs over the life of the related patent .as of december 31 , 2013 , the company had remaining unamortized capitalized legal costs of $ 23.7 million , which , under the previous accounting method , would have been amortized through 2021 .under the new method of accounting , these legal costs are expensed in the period they are incurred .the company has retrospectively adjusted the comparative financial statements of prior periods to apply this new method of accounting .the company believes this change in accounting principle is preferable because ( 1 ) as more competitors enter the company 2019s key product markets and the threat of complex intellectual property litigation across multiple jurisdictions increases , it will become more difficult for the company to accurately assess the probability of a favorable outcome in such litigation , and ( 2 ) it will enhance the comparability of the company 2019s financial results with those of its peer group because it is the predominant accounting practice in the company 2019s industry .the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes have been adjusted to reflect the impact of this change retrospectively to all prior periods presented .the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle was a decrease in retained earnings of $ 10.5 million as of january 1 , 2012 .the following tables present the effects of the retrospective application of the change in accounting principle ( in millions ) : .
[['consolidated balance sheet', 'as of december 31 2013 as reported', 'as of december 31 2013 as adjusted'], ['other intangible assets net', '$ 57.2', '$ 33.5'], ['deferred income taxes', '70.1', '79.0'], ['total assets', '2724.7', '2709.9'], ['retained earnings', '2045.6', '2030.8'], ["total stockholders' equity", '1559.2', '1544.4'], ["total liabilities and stockholders' equity", '2724.7', '2709.9']]
.

Question: what was the affect of the change in accounting principles on other intangible assets net in millions?
Answer: -23.7
Explanation: size of the write down due to change