2015 vs .2014 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) and 27.1% ( 27.1 % ) in 2015 and 2014 , respectively .the effective tax rate was higher in fiscal year 2014 primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 305.2 , which was not deductible for tax purposes , and the chilean tax reform enacted in september 2014 which increased income tax expense by $ 20.6 .these impacts were partially offset by an income tax benefit of $ 51.6 associated with losses from transactions and a tax election in a non-u.s .subsidiary .refer to note 10 , goodwill , and note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .on a non-gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) and 24.1% ( 24.1 % ) in 2015 and 2014 , respectively .discontinued operations on 29 march 2016 , the board of directors approved the company 2019s exit of its energy-from-waste ( efw ) business .as a result , efforts to start up and operate its two efw projects located in tees valley , united kingdom , have been discontinued .the decision to exit the business and stop development of the projects was based on continued difficulties encountered and the company 2019s conclusion , based on testing and analysis completed during the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 , that significant additional time and resources would be required to make the projects operational .in addition , the decision allows the company to execute its strategy of focusing resources on its core industrial gases business .the efw segment has been presented as a discontinued operation .prior year efw business segment information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation .in fiscal 2016 , our loss from discontinued operations , net of tax , of $ 884.2 primarily resulted from the write down of assets to their estimated net realizable value and to record a liability for plant disposition and other costs .income tax benefits related only to one of the projects , as the other did not qualify for a local tax deduction .the loss from discontinued operations also includes land lease costs , commercial and administrative costs , and costs incurred for ongoing project exit activities .we expect additional exit costs of $ 50 to $ 100 to be recorded in future periods .in fiscal 2015 , our loss from discontinued operations , net of tax , related to efw was $ 6.8 .this resulted from costs for land leases and commercial and administrative expenses .in fiscal 2014 , our loss from discontinued operations , net of tax , was $ 2.9 .this included a loss , net of tax , of $ 7.5 for the cost of efw land leases and commercial and administrative expenses .this loss was partially offset by a gain of $ 3.9 for the sale of the remaining homecare business and settlement of contingencies related to a sale of a separate portion of the business to the linde group in 2012 .refer to note 4 , discontinued operations , for additional details .segment analysis industrial gases 2013 americas .
[['', '2016', '2015', '2014'], ['sales', '$ 3343.6', '$ 3693.9', '$ 4078.5'], ['operating income', '895.2', '808.4', '762.6'], ['operating margin', '26.8% ( 26.8 % )', '21.9% ( 21.9 % )', '18.7% ( 18.7 % )'], ['equity affiliates 2019 income', '52.7', '64.6', '60.9'], ['adjusted ebitda', '1390.4', '1289.9', '1237.9'], ['adjusted ebitda margin', '41.6% ( 41.6 % )', '34.9% ( 34.9 % )', '30.4% ( 30.4 % )']]
.

Question: what is the increase in the operating margin observed in 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 4.9%
Explanation: it is the variation between these operating margins .