HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
part ii item 5 .market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2016 and 2015. .
[['2016', 'high', 'low'], ['quarter ended march 31', '$ 102.93', '$ 83.07'], ['quarter ended june 30', '113.63', '101.87'], ['quarter ended september 30', '118.26', '107.57'], ['quarter ended december 31', '118.09', '99.72'], ['2015', 'high', 'low'], ['quarter ended march 31', '$ 101.88', '$ 93.21'], ['quarter ended june 30', '98.64', '91.99'], ['quarter ended september 30', '101.54', '86.83'], ['quarter ended december 31', '104.12', '87.23']]
on february 17 , 2017 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 108.11 per share as reported on the nyse .as of february 17 , 2017 , we had 427195037 outstanding shares of common stock and 153 registered holders .dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) .generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) .we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , issued in may 2014 , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) .dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors .the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant .we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 3.2 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2017 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income. .

Question: on february 17 , 2017 , what was the company's market capitalization as reported on the nyse.\\n\\n
Answer: 46184055450.1
10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 10/28/18 applied materials , inc .s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite part ii item 5 : market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information applied 2019s common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol amat .as of december 7 , 2018 , there were 2854 registered holders of applied common stock .performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 27 , 2013 through october 28 , 2018 .this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period .the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 27 , 2013 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any .dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar .the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/27/13 in stock or 10/31/13 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .indexes calculated on month-end basis .copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .all rights reserved. .
[['', '10/27/2013', '10/26/2014', '10/25/2015', '10/30/2016', '10/29/2017', '10/28/2018'], ['applied materials', '100.00', '121.04', '96.67', '171.69', '343.16', '198.27'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '117.27', '123.37', '128.93', '159.40', '171.11'], ['rdg semiconductor composite index', '100.00', '128.42', '126.26', '154.41', '232.29', '221.61']]
.

Question: what is the roi for applied materials if the investment made on october 2013 was sold 5 years later?
Answer: 98.27%
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .
[['fiscal year ended ( 2 )', 'snap-on incorporated', 'peer group ( 3 )', 's&p 500'], ['december 31 2002', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00'], ['december 31 2003', '118.80', '126.16', '128.68'], ['december 31 2004', '130.66', '152.42', '142.69'], ['december 31 2005', '146.97', '157.97', '149.70'], ['december 31 2006', '191.27', '185.10', '173.34'], ['december 31 2007', '198.05', '216.19', '182.87']]
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation .( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w .grainger , inc. .

Question: in 2004 what was the ratio of the snap-on incorporated to the peer group perfomance
Answer: 0.86
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) these acquisitions have been recorded using the purchase method of accounting , and accordingly , the purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition .the operating results of each acquisition are included in our consolidated statements of income from the dates of each acquisition .fiscal 2008 during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a portfolio of merchants that process discover transactions and the rights to process discover transactions for our existing and new merchants .as a result of this acquisition , we will now process discover transactions similarly to how we currently process visa and mastercard transactions .the purpose of this acquisition was to offer merchants a single point of contact for discover , visa and mastercard card processing .during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a .and euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain .lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america .the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations .during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states .the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering .the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of these business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .
[['', 'total'], ['goodwill', '$ 13536'], ['customer-related intangible assets', '4091'], ['contract-based intangible assets', '1031'], ['property and equipment', '267'], ['other current assets', '502'], ['total assets acquired', '19427'], ['current liabilities', '-2347 ( 2347 )'], ['minority interest in equity of subsidiary', '-486 ( 486 )'], ['net assets acquired', '$ 16594']]
the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years .these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions .in addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million .the value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately .the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years. .

Question: what portion of the net assets acquired is related to goodwill?
Answer: 81.6%
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) amortization expense for other intangible assets was approximately $ 75 million in 2017 , $ 77 million in 2016 , and $ 93 million in 2015 .the following table presents our estimate of amortization expense for each of the five next succeeding fiscal years: .
[['', '( in millions )'], ['for the years ending december 31,', ''], ['2018', '$ 64'], ['2019', '54'], ['2020', '52'], ['2021', '19'], ['2022', '16']]
.

Question: what was the ratio of the amortization expense for other intangible assets from to 20192018
Answer: 1.19
Explanation: the ratio of the amortization expense for other intangible assets from to 2018 to 2019 was 1.18 to 1
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 7 2014income taxes ( continued ) as of september 30 , 2006 , the company has state and foreign tax loss and state credit carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 55 million .certain of those carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 12 million , expire between 2016 and 2019 .a portion of these carryforwards was acquired from the company 2019s previous acquisitions , the utilization of which is subject to certain limitations imposed by the internal revenue code .the remaining benefits from tax losses and credits do not expire .as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , a valuation allowance of $ 5 million was recorded against the deferred tax asset for the benefits of state operating losses that may not be realized .management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities , will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets .a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : 2006 2005 2004 as restated ( 1 ) as restated ( 1 ) .
[['', '2006', '2005 as restated ( 1 )', '2004 as restated ( 1 )'], ['computed expected tax', '$ 987', '$ 633', '$ 129'], ['state taxes net of federal effect', '86', '-19 ( 19 )', '-5 ( 5 )'], ['indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries', '-224 ( 224 )', '-98 ( 98 )', '-31 ( 31 )'], ['nondeductible executive compensation', '11', '14', '12'], ['research and development credit net', '-12 ( 12 )', '-26 ( 26 )', '-5 ( 5 )'], ['other items', '-19 ( 19 )', '-24 ( 24 )', '4'], ['provision for income taxes', '$ 829', '$ 480', '$ 104'], ['effective tax rate', '29% ( 29 % )', '27% ( 27 % )', '28% ( 28 % )']]
( 1 ) see note 2 , 201crestatement of consolidated financial statements . 201d the company 2019s income taxes payable has been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock options .the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the option price , tax effected .the net tax benefits from employee stock option transactions were $ 419 million , $ 428 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) , and $ 83 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively , and were reflected as an increase to common stock in the consolidated statements of shareholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?
Answer: $ 240.41
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s .companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period .the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2007 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s .companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .
[['', '3/31/2007', '3/31/2008', '3/31/2009', '3/31/2010', '3/31/2011', '3/31/2012'], ['abiomed inc', '100', '96.19', '35.87', '75.55', '106.37', '162.45'], ['nasdaq composite index', '100', '94.11', '63.12', '99.02', '114.84', '127.66'], ['nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849', '100', '82.91', '41.56', '77.93', '94.54', '74.40']]
this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing .transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Question: did abiomed outperform the nasdaq composite index?
Answer: yes
entergy louisiana , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses .2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes .net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .
[['', '( in millions )'], ['2003 net revenue', '$ 973.7'], ['price applied to unbilled sales', '-31.9 ( 31.9 )'], ['deferred fuel cost revisions', '-29.4 ( 29.4 )'], ['rate refund provisions', '-12.2 ( 12.2 )'], ['volume/weather', '17.0'], ['summer capacity charges', '11.8'], ['other', '2.3'], ['2004 net revenue', '$ 931.3']]
the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs .the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds .the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors .the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what are the deferred fuel cost revisions as a percentage of 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 3.16%
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 .the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested .no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock .stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns .comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc .nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .
[['', 'july 27 2000', 'december 29 2000', 'december 28 2001', 'december 27 2002', 'december 26 2003'], ['illumina inc .', '100.00', '100.39', '71.44', '19.50', '43.81'], ['nasdaq composite index', '100.00', '63.84', '51.60', '35.34', '51.73'], ['nasdaq pharmaceutical index', '100.00', '93.20', '82.08', '51.96', '74.57']]
.

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total stockholder return percentage for illumina inc . common stock versus the nasdaq pharmaceutical index for the four years end 2003?
Answer: -30.76%
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p small cap 600 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices .comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2005 to december 31 , 2010 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .
[['company/index', 'baseperiod 12/31/05', 'baseperiod 12/31/06', 'baseperiod 12/31/07', 'baseperiod 12/31/08', 'baseperiod 12/31/09', '12/31/10'], ['a o smith corp', '100.0', '108.7', '103.3', '88.8', '133.6', '178.8'], ['s&p small cap 600 index', '100.0', '115.1', '114.8', '78.1', '98.0', '123.8'], ['russell 1000 index', '100.0', '115.5', '122.1', '76.2', '97.9', '113.6']]
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the difference in the cumulative total return for a o smith corp and the russell 1000 index for the five year period ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 65.2%
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .
[['fiscal year ended ( 2 )', 'snap-on incorporated', 'peer group ( 3 )', 's&p 500'], ['december 31 2002', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00', '$ 100.00'], ['december 31 2003', '118.80', '126.16', '128.68'], ['december 31 2004', '130.66', '152.42', '142.69'], ['december 31 2005', '146.97', '157.97', '149.70'], ['december 31 2006', '191.27', '185.10', '173.34'], ['december 31 2007', '198.05', '216.19', '182.87']]
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation .( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w .grainger , inc. .

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Answer: 22.2%
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2012 , we repurchased 619314 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of approximately $ 46.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .
[['period', 'total number of shares purchased ( 1 )', 'average price paid per share ( 2 )', 'total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans orprograms', 'approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( in millions )'], ['october 2012', '27524', '$ 72.62', '27524', '$ 1300.1'], ['november 2012', '489390', '$ 74.22', '489390', '$ 1263.7'], ['december 2012', '102400', '$ 74.83', '102400', '$ 1256.1'], ['total fourth quarter', '619314', '$ 74.25', '619314', '$ 1256.1']]
( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in march 2011 ( the 201c2011 buyback 201d ) .under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors .to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods .this program may be discontinued at any time .( 2 ) average price per share is calculated using the aggregate price , excluding commissions and fees .we continued to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2011 buyback subsequent to december 31 , 2012 .between january 1 , 2013 and january 21 , 2013 , we repurchased an additional 15790 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the 2011 buyback .as a result , as of january 21 , 2013 , we had repurchased a total of approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock under the 2011 buyback for an aggregate of $ 245.2 million , including commissions and fees .we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 1.3 billion under the 2011 buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Question: was was the total amount spent on stock repurchases in december 2012?
Answer: 7662592