HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
notes to consolidated financial statements uncertain tax provisions as described in note 1 , the company adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .the effect of adopting fin 48 was not material to the company 2019s financial statements .the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) . .
[['balance at january 1 2007', '$ 53'], ['additions based on tax positions related to the current year', '4'], ['additions for tax positions of prior years', '24'], ['reductions for tax positions of prior years', '-6 ( 6 )'], ['settlements', '-5 ( 5 )'], ['balance at december 31 2007', '$ 70']]
of the amount included in the previous table , $ 57 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized .aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months .the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes .aon accrued potential penalties and interest of less than $ 1 million related to unrecognized tax positions during 2007 .in total , as of december 31 , 2007 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties and interest of $ 1 million and $ 7 million , respectively .aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s .federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions .aon has substantially concluded all u.s .federal income tax matters for years through 2004 .the internal revenue service commenced an examination of aon 2019s federal u.s .income tax returns for 2005 and 2006 in the fourth quarter of 2007 .material u.s .state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 .aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2000 .aon corporation .

Question: what portion of the of unrecognized tax benefits would have an impact in the effective tax rate if recognized?
Answer: 81.4%
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dow jones , and the s&p 500 .the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 and that all dividends were reinvested .purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2010 , we repurchased 17556522 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 75.51 .the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2010 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .
[['period', 'total number ofsharespurchased [a]', 'averageprice paidper share', 'total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b]', 'maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]'], ['oct . 1 through oct . 31', '725450', '84.65', '519554', '17917736'], ['nov . 1 through nov . 30', '1205260', '89.92', '1106042', '16811694'], ['dec . 1 through dec . 31', '1133106', '92.59', '875000', '15936694'], ['total', '3063816', '$ 89.66', '2500596', 'n/a']]
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 563220 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .[b] on may 1 , 2008 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 40 million shares of our common stock through march 31 , 2011 .we may make these repurchases on the open market or through other transactions .our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions .on february 3 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 40 million additional shares of our common stock under a new program effective from april 1 , 2011 through march 31 , 2014. .

Question: for the quarter ended december 312010 what was percent of the total number of shares purchased in november
Answer: 39.3%
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .
[['year ended december 31 ( in millions )', '2009', '2008', '2007'], ['trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments', '$ 318063', '$ 384102', '$ 381415'], ['trading assets 2013 derivative receivables', '110457', '121417', '65439'], ['trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a )', '$ 60224', '$ 78841', '$ 94737'], ['trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables', '77901', '93200', '65198']]
( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased .note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value .elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis .elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year .2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis .2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities .( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction .the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2009 trading assets , in millions?
Answer: 257839
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500 index" ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor's industrials index ( "s&p industrials index" ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor's consumer durables & apparel index ( "s&p consumer durables & apparel index" ) , from december 31 , 2012 through december 31 , 2017 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 43.94 .the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2012 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .
[['', '2013', '2014', '2015', '2016', '2017'], ['masco', '$ 138.48', '$ 155.26', '$ 200.79', '$ 227.08', '$ 318.46'], ['s&p 500 index', '$ 132.04', '$ 149.89', '$ 151.94', '$ 169.82', '$ 206.49'], ['s&p industrials index', '$ 140.18', '$ 153.73', '$ 149.83', '$ 177.65', '$ 214.55'], ['s&p consumer durables & apparel index', '$ 135.84', '$ 148.31', '$ 147.23', '$ 138.82', '$ 164.39']]
$ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $ 350.00 masco s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index .

Question: what was the ratio of the value of the common stock masco to s&p 500 index in 2015
Answer: 1.32
Explanation: the ratio of the value of the common stock masco to s&p 500 index in 2015 was 1.32 to 1
awards .awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the merger .awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc .and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc .prior to such date .at december 31 , 2009 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan .stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants .we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier .expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option .the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option .we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options .when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .the weighted- average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 3.79 , $ 4.36 and $ 6.49 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .
[['', '2009', '2008', '2007'], ['expected volatility', '28.7% ( 28.7 % )', '27.3% ( 27.3 % )', '23.5% ( 23.5 % )'], ['risk-free interest rate', '1.4% ( 1.4 % )', '1.7% ( 1.7 % )', '4.8% ( 4.8 % )'], ['dividend yield', '3.1% ( 3.1 % )', '2.9% ( 2.9 % )', '1.5% ( 1.5 % )'], ['expected life ( in years )', '4.2', '4.2', '4.0'], ['contractual life ( in years )', '7', '7', '7'], ['expected forfeiture rate', '3.0% ( 3.0 % )', '3.0% ( 3.0 % )', '5.0% ( 5.0 % )']]
republic services , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Question: what was the percentage growth in the dividend yield from 2007 to 2008
Answer: 93.3%
Explanation: the dividend yield grew by 93.3% from 2007 to 2008
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .
[['', 'issued', 'in treasury', 'shares outstanding'], ['balance january 1 2010', '1334', '-139 ( 139 )', '1195'], ['acquisition of smith international inc .', '100', '76', '176'], ['shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged', '2013', '6', '6'], ['shares issued under employee stock purchase plan', '2013', '3', '3'], ['stock repurchase program', '2013', '-27 ( 27 )', '-27 ( 27 )'], ['issued on conversions of debentures', '2013', '8', '8'], ['balance december 31 2010', '1434', '-73 ( 73 )', '1361'], ['shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged', '2013', '6', '6'], ['vesting of restricted stock', '2013', '1', '1'], ['shares issued under employee stock purchase plan', '2013', '3', '3'], ['stock repurchase program', '2013', '-37 ( 37 )', '-37 ( 37 )'], ['balance december 31 2011', '1434', '-100 ( 100 )', '1334'], ['shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged', '2013', '4', '4'], ['shares issued under employee stock purchase plan', '2013', '4', '4'], ['stock repurchase program', '2013', '-14 ( 14 )', '-14 ( 14 )'], ['balance december 31 2012', '1434', '-106 ( 106 )', '1328']]
see the notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: what would the 2012 shares outstanding in millions have been without the acquisition of smith international?
Answer: 1152
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures the 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 $ 276 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2030 .these debentures have an 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) interest rate until april 1 , 2020 , and , thereafter , the interest rate will be 7.62% ( 7.62 % ) for the final 10 years .these debentures are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time .the redemption price is equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption ( at a benchmark treasury yield plus five basis points ) plus accrued interest .2022 $ 424 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2020 .these debentures are not subject to redemption prior to maturity .interest is payable semiannually in april and october for both tranches and neither tranche is subject to sinking fund requirements .we subsequently entered into interest rate swaps on the 2020 debentures , which effectively converted the fixed interest rates on the debentures to variable libor-based interest rates .the average interest rate payable on the 2020 debentures , including the impact of the interest rate swaps , for 2016 and 2015 was 5.43% ( 5.43 % ) and 5.04% ( 5.04 % ) , respectively .floating rate senior notes the floating rate senior notes bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2016 and 2015 was 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) and 0.01% ( 0.01 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after 10 years at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2066 .in march , june and august 2016 , we issued floating rate senior notes in principal balances of $ 118 , $ 74 and $ 35 million , respectively .these notes bear interest at three-month libor less 30 basis points and mature in 2066 .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .
[['', '2016', '2015'], ['vehicles', '$ 68', '$ 74'], ['aircraft', '2291', '2289'], ['buildings', '190', '207'], ['accumulated amortization', '-896 ( 896 )', '-849 ( 849 )'], ['property plant and equipment subject to capital leases', '$ 1653', '$ 1721']]
these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2017 through 3005. .

Question: what was the change in millions of buildings from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -17
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index .the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions .the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .the goldman sachs group , inc .s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions .the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .
[['', '12/26/08', '12/31/09', '12/31/10', '12/31/11', '12/31/12', '12/31/13'], ['the goldman sachs group inc .', '$ 100.00', '$ 224.98', '$ 226.19', '$ 123.05', '$ 176.42', '$ 248.36'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '130.93', '150.65', '153.83', '178.42', '236.20'], ['s&p 500 financials index', '100.00', '124.38', '139.47', '115.67', '148.92', '201.92']]
218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: what is the five year total return on the goldman sachs group inc.?
Answer: 148.36
the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities .we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2016 to assume these obligations .the fair value of our notes is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market .the fair value of our euro notes is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in a market that is not active , and therefore is classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy .note 12 .commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment .the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .
[['2017', '$ 200450'], ['2018', '168926'], ['2019', '136462'], ['2020', '110063'], ['2021', '82494'], ['thereafter', '486199'], ['future minimum lease payments', '$ 1184594']]
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million .we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 13%
net impairment we recognized $ 16.9 million and $ 14.9 million of net impairment during the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , on certain securities in our non-agency cmo portfolio due to continued deterioration in the expected credit performance of the underlying loans in those specific securities .the gross other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ) and the noncredit portion of otti , which was or had been previously recorded through other comprehensive income ( loss ) , are shown in the table below ( dollars in millions ) : year ended december 31 , 2012 2011 .
[['', 'year ended december 31 2012', '2011'], ['other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d )', '$ -19.8 ( 19.8 )', '$ -9.2 ( 9.2 )'], ['less : noncredit portion of otti recognized into ( out of ) other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( before tax )', '2.9', '-5.7 ( 5.7 )'], ['net impairment', '$ -16.9 ( 16.9 )', '$ -14.9 ( 14.9 )']]
provision for loan losses provision for loan losses decreased 20% ( 20 % ) to $ 354.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 compared to 2011 .the decrease in provision for loan losses was driven primarily by improving credit trends , as evidenced by the lower levels of delinquent loans in the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolios , and loan portfolio run-off .the decrease was partially offset by $ 50 million in charge-offs associated with newly identified bankruptcy filings during the third quarter of 2012 , with approximately 80% ( 80 % ) related to prior years .we utilize third party loan servicers to obtain bankruptcy data on our borrowers and during the third quarter of 2012 , we identified an increase in bankruptcies reported by one specific servicer .in researching this increase , we discovered that the servicer had not been reporting historical bankruptcy data on a timely basis .as a result , we implemented an enhanced procedure around all servicer reporting to corroborate bankruptcy reporting with independent third party data .through this additional process , approximately $ 90 million of loans were identified in which servicers failed to report the bankruptcy filing to us , approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of which were current at the end of the third quarter of 2012 .as a result , these loans were written down to the estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs , or approximately $ 40 million , during the third quarter of 2012 .these charge-offs resulted in an increase to provision for loan losses of $ 50 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the provision for loan losses has declined four consecutive years , down 78% ( 78 % ) from its peak of $ 1.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .we expect provision for loan losses to continue to decline over the long term , although it is subject to variability in any given quarter. .

Question: what was the change in otti between 2011 and 2012 , in millions?
Answer: 10.6