HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of the company 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 25 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector .the graph assumes , in each case , an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends .historical prices prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , have been adjusted to reflect the value of the separation transaction .the graph , table and related information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into future filings under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .copyright a9 2018 standard & poor's , a division of s&p global .all rights reserved. .
[['as of december 31,', '2012', '2013', '2014', '2015', '2016', '2017'], ['arconic inc .', '$ 100', '$ 124.15', '$ 186.02', '$ 117.48', '$ 99.40', '$ 147.47'], ['s&p 500 aeindex', '100', '132.39', '150.51', '152.59', '170.84', '208.14'], ['s&p 500 aematerials index', '100', '125.60', '134.28', '123.03', '143.56', '177.79']]
s&p 500 ae index 100 132.39 150.51 152.59 170.84 208.14 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 125.60 134.28 123.03 143.56 177.79 .

Question: what is the annualized return for the s&p 500 aematerials index during 2012 and 2017?
Answer: 22.25%
Explanation: it is the return of the initial investment from 2012 to 2017 turned into an annualized return by the compound interest formula .
at december 31 , 2013 , the aggregate amount of investment grade funded loans was $ 6.5 billion and the aggregate amount of non-investment grade funded loans was $ 7.9 billion .in connection with these corporate lending activities ( which include corporate funded and unfunded lending commitments ) , the company had hedges ( which include 201csingle name , 201d 201csector 201d and 201cindex 201d hedges ) with a notional amount of $ 9.0 billion related to the total corporate lending exposure of $ 93.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 .201cevent-driven 201d loans and lending commitments at december 31 , 2013 .included in the total corporate lending exposure amounts in the table above at december 31 , 2013 were 201cevent- driven 201d exposures of $ 9.5 billion composed of funded loans of $ 2.0 billion and lending commitments of $ 7.5 billion .included in the 201cevent-driven 201d exposure at december 31 , 2013 were $ 7.3 billion of loans and lending commitments to non-investment grade borrowers .the maturity profile of the 201cevent-driven 201d loans and lending commitments at december 31 , 2013 was as follows : 33% ( 33 % ) will mature in less than 1 year , 17% ( 17 % ) will mature within 1 to 3 years , 32% ( 32 % ) will mature within 3 to 5 years and 18% ( 18 % ) will mature in over 5 years .industry exposure 2014corporate lending .the company also monitors its credit exposure to individual industries for credit exposure arising from corporate loans and lending commitments as discussed above .the following table shows the company 2019s credit exposure from its primary corporate loans and lending commitments by industry at december 31 , 2013 : industry corporate lending exposure ( dollars in millions ) .
[['industry', 'corporate lending exposure ( dollars in millions )'], ['energy', '$ 12240'], ['utilities', '10410'], ['healthcare', '10095'], ['consumer discretionary', '9981'], ['industrials', '9514'], ['funds exchanges and other financial services ( 1 )', '7190'], ['consumer staples', '6788'], ['information technology', '6526'], ['telecommunications services', '5658'], ['materials', '4867'], ['real estate', '4171'], ['other', '5593'], ['total', '$ 93033']]
( 1 ) includes mutual funds , pension funds , private equity and real estate funds , exchanges and clearinghouses and diversified financial services .institutional securities other lending activities .in addition to the primary corporate lending activity described above , the institutional securities business segment engages in other lending activity .these loans primarily include corporate loans purchased in the secondary market , commercial and residential mortgage loans , asset-backed loans and financing extended to institutional clients .at december 31 , 2013 , approximately 99.6% ( 99.6 % ) of institutional securities other lending activities held for investment were current ; less than 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) were on non- accrual status because the loans were past due for a period of 90 days or more or payment of principal or interest was in doubt. .

Question: consumer related loans make up how much of the companies total corporate lending exposure?
Answer: 18%
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2010 net revenue', '$ 5051'], ['mark-to-market tax settlement sharing', '-196 ( 196 )'], ['purchased power capacity', '-21 ( 21 )'], ['net wholesale revenue', '-14 ( 14 )'], ['volume/weather', '13'], ['ano decommissioning trust', '24'], ['retail electric price', '49'], ['other', '-2 ( 2 )'], ['2011 net revenue', '$ 4904']]
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases .the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors .weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers .industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 .entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions .increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments .the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income .the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 .these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the entergy corporation and subsidiaries net revenue in 2011
Answer: -2.9%
there were no share repurchases in 2016 .stock performance graph the graph below matches fidelity national information services , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services index.aa the graph tracks the performance of a $ 100 investment in our common stock and in each index ( with the reinvestment of all dividends ) from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .
[['', '12/11', '12/12', '12/13', '12/14', '12/15', '12/16'], ['fidelity national information services inc .', '100.00', '134.12', '210.97', '248.68', '246.21', '311.81'], ['s&p 500', '100.00', '116.00', '153.58', '174.60', '177.01', '198.18'], ['s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services', '100.00', '126.06', '194.91', '218.05', '247.68', '267.14']]
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .item 6 .selected financial ss the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with "item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , " and "item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , " included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . for the period ending 12/16?
Answer: 211.81%
table of contents in this form 10-k , we discuss non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income , non-gaap net income per diluted share , ebitda , adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin , which are non-gaap financial measures .we believe these measures provide analysts , investors and management with helpful information regarding the underlying operating performance of our business , as they remove the impact of items that management believes are not reflective of underlying operating performance .management uses these measures to evaluate period-over-period performance as management believes they provide a more comparable measure of the underlying business .additionally , adjusted ebitda is a measure in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , which is used to evaluate our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments .for further details regarding the term loan , see long-term debt and financing arrangements within management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and note 10 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements .for the definitions of non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income and adjusted ebitda and reconciliations to net income , see 201cresults of operations 201d .the results of certain key business metrics are as follows: .
[['( dollars in millions )', 'years ended december 31 , 2017', 'years ended december 31 , 2016', 'years ended december 31 , 2015'], ['net sales', '$ 15191.5', '$ 13981.9', '$ 12988.7'], ['gross profit', '2449.9', '2327.2', '2115.8'], ['income from operations', '866.1', '819.2', '742.0'], ['net income', '523.0', '424.4', '403.1'], ['non-gaap net income', '605.8', '569.0', '503.5'], ['adjusted ebitda', '1185.6', '1117.3', '1018.5'], ['average daily sales', '59.8', '55.0', '51.1'], ['net debt ( 1 )', '3091.3', '2970.7', '3222.1'], ['cash conversion cycle ( in days ) ( 2 )', '19', '19', '21']]
net debt ( 1 ) 3091.3 2970.7 3222.1 cash conversion cycle ( in days ) ( 2 ) 19 19 21 ( 1 ) defined as total debt minus cash and cash equivalents .( 2 ) cash conversion cycle is defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable and certain receivables due from vendors plus days of supply in merchandise inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable and accounts payable-inventory financing , based on a rolling three-month average. .

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?
Answer: 18%
entergy louisiana , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses .2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes .net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .
[['', '( in millions )'], ['2003 net revenue', '$ 973.7'], ['price applied to unbilled sales', '-31.9 ( 31.9 )'], ['deferred fuel cost revisions', '-29.4 ( 29.4 )'], ['rate refund provisions', '-12.2 ( 12.2 )'], ['volume/weather', '17.0'], ['summer capacity charges', '11.8'], ['other', '2.3'], ['2004 net revenue', '$ 931.3']]
the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs .the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds .the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors .the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy louisiana?
Answer: -4.4%
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information .the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 .the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .price range of common stock .
[['2001 first quarter', 'high $ 60.15', 'low $ 41.30', '2000 first quarter', 'high $ 44.72', 'low $ 34.25'], ['second quarter', '52.25', '39.95', 'second quarter', '49.63', '35.56'], ['third quarter', '44.50', '12.00', 'third quarter', '70.25', '45.13'], ['fourth quarter', '17.80', '11.60', 'fourth quarter', '72.81', '45.00']]
( b ) holders .as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .( c ) dividends .under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay .in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty .the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was average of high and low stock prices for the first quarter of 2000?
Answer: 39.49
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 26 , 2008 through october 27 , 2013 .this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period .the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 26 , 2008 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any .dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar .the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * assumes $ 100 invested on 10/26/08 in stock or 10/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .indexes calculated on month-end basis .201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .
[['', '10/26/2008', '10/25/2009', '10/31/2010', '10/30/2011', '10/28/2012', '10/27/2013'], ['applied materials', '100.00', '116.07', '113.08', '118.21', '102.77', '175.76'], ['s&p 500 index', '100.00', '109.80', '127.94', '138.29', '159.32', '202.61'], ['rdg semiconductor composite index', '100.00', '124.98', '153.98', '166.89', '149.81', '200.47']]
dividends during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share .during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 per share .during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.07 .dividends declared during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 469 million , $ 438 million and $ 408 million , respectively .applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders. .

Question: what is the total return if 100000 are invested in applied materials in 2008 and sold in 2011?
Answer: 18210
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock on january 2 , 2010 and in each index on december 31 , 2009 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of cadence 2019s fiscal year through january 3 , 2015 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/28/13 1/3/151/1/11 12/31/11 12/29/121/2/10 *$ 100 invested on 1/2/10 in stock or 12/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .indexes calculated on month-end basis .copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .all rights reserved. .
[['', '1/2/2010', '1/1/2011', '12/31/2011', '12/29/2012', '12/28/2013', '1/3/2015'], ['cadence design systems inc .', '100.00', '137.90', '173.62', '224.37', '232.55', '314.36'], ['nasdaq composite', '100.00', '117.61', '118.70', '139.00', '196.83', '223.74'], ['s&p 400 information technology', '100.00', '128.72', '115.22', '135.29', '173.25', '187.84']]
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . and the nasdaq copmosite for the period ended 1/3/2015?
Answer: 90.62%
republic services , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the plan to reflect the allied acquisition .the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provides for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards .awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition .awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic prior to such date .as of december 31 , 2013 , there were approximately 15.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan .stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants .we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier .expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option .the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option .we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options .when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 5.27 , $ 4.77 and $ 5.35 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .
[['', '2013', '2012', '2011'], ['expected volatility', '28.9% ( 28.9 % )', '27.8% ( 27.8 % )', '27.3% ( 27.3 % )'], ['risk-free interest rate', '0.7% ( 0.7 % )', '0.8% ( 0.8 % )', '1.7% ( 1.7 % )'], ['dividend yield', '3.2% ( 3.2 % )', '3.2% ( 3.2 % )', '2.7% ( 2.7 % )'], ['expected life ( in years )', '4.5', '4.5', '4.4'], ['contractual life ( in years )', '7.0', '7.0', '7.0']]
.

Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013
Answer: 3.95%
Explanation: the change in volatility from 2012 to 2013 was 3.95%