HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
performance graph the following graph and table compares the cumulative five-year total return provided to shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and our customized peer group .the peer group includes cboe holdings , inc. , intercontinentalexchange group , inc .and nasdaq , inc .an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 cme group inc .s&p 500 peer group * $ 100 invested on 12/31/12 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending december 31 .copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .all rights reserved .the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
[['', '2013', '2014', '2015', '2016', '2017'], ['cme group inc .', '$ 164.01', '$ 194.06', '$ 208.95', '$ 279.85', '$ 370.32'], ['s&p 500', '132.39', '150.51', '152.59', '170.84', '208.14'], ['peer group', '176.61', '187.48', '219.99', '249.31', '323.23']]
unregistered sales of equity securities during the past three years there have not been any unregistered sales by the company of equity securities. .

Question: in 2017 what was the ratio of the the cme group inc . stock perfomamce to the s&p
Answer: 1.8
.
[['( $ in millions except per share amounts )', 'year ended december 31 2014 1st qtr', 'year ended december 31 2014 2nd qtr', 'year ended december 31 2014 3rd qtr', 'year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr ( 3 )'], ['sales and service revenues', '$ 1594', '$ 1719', '$ 1717', '$ 1927'], ['operating income ( loss )', '159', '181', '171', '144'], ['earnings ( loss ) before income taxes', '132', '152', '144', '79'], ['net earnings ( loss )', '90', '100', '96', '52'], ['dividends declared per share', '$ 0.20', '$ 0.20', '$ 0.20', '$ 0.40'], ['basic earnings ( loss ) per share', '$ 1.83', '$ 2.05', '$ 1.97', '$ 1.07'], ['diluted earnings ( loss ) per share', '$ 1.81', '$ 2.04', '$ 1.96', '$ 1.05']]
( 3 ) in the fourth quarter of 2014 , the company recorded a $ 47 million goodwill impairment charge .item 9 .changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a .controls and procedures disclosure controls and procedures the company's management , with the participation of the company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer , has evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in rules 13a-15 ( e ) and 15d-15 ( e ) under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the "exchange act" ) ) as of december 31 , 2015 .based on that evaluation , the company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that , as of december 31 , 2015 , the company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the company files or submits under the exchange act is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in sec rules and forms , and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to management to allow their timely decisions regarding required disclosure .changes in internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended december 31 , 2015 , no change occurred in the company's internal control over financial reporting that materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the company's internal control over financial reporting. .

Question: what was the operating margin in the 4th quarter
Answer: 7.5%
Explanation: the operating margin is the operating income divide by the revenues
the following table summarizes the short-term borrowing activity for awcc for the years ended december 31: .
[['', '2017', '2016'], ['average borrowings', '$ 779', '$ 850'], ['maximum borrowings outstanding', '1135', '1016'], ['weighted average interest rates computed on daily basis', '1.24% ( 1.24 % )', '0.78% ( 0.78 % )'], ['weighted average interest rates as of december 31', '1.61% ( 1.61 % )', '0.98% ( 0.98 % )']]
the credit facility requires the company to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .the ratio as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.59 to 1.00 .none of the company 2019s borrowings are subject to default or prepayment as a result of a downgrading of securities , although such a downgrading could increase fees and interest charges under the company 2019s credit facility .as part of the normal course of business , the company routinely enters contracts for the purchase and sale of water , energy , fuels and other services .these contracts either contain express provisions or otherwise permit the company and its counterparties to demand adequate assurance of future performance when there are reasonable grounds for doing so .in accordance with the contracts and applicable contract law , if the company is downgraded by a credit rating agency , especially if such downgrade is to a level below investment grade , it is possible that a counterparty would attempt to rely on such a downgrade as a basis for making a demand for adequate assurance of future performance .depending on the company 2019s net position with the counterparty , the demand could be for the posting of collateral .in the absence of expressly agreed provisions that specify the collateral that must be provided , the obligation to supply the collateral requested will be a function of the facts and circumstances of the company 2019s situation at the time of the demand .if the company can reasonably claim that it is willing and financially able to perform its obligations , it may be possible that no collateral would need to be posted or that only an amount equal to two or three months of future payments should be sufficient .the company does not expect to post any collateral which will have a material adverse impact on the company 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows .note 12 : general taxes the following table summarizes the components of general tax expense for the years ended december 31 : 2017 2016 2015 gross receipts and franchise ..........................................$ 110 $ 106 $ 99 property and capital stock ............................................105 106 98 payroll ...........................................................31 32 31 other general ......................................................13 14 15 total general taxes ..................................................$ 259 $ 258 $ 243 .

Question: what was the percent growth of borrowings outstanding from 2016 to 2017
Answer: 11.7%
Explanation: the percentage change is the difference between the ( end balance and the begin balance ) /begin balance
news corporation notes to the consolidated financial statements contract liabilities and assets the company 2019s deferred revenue balance primarily relates to amounts received from customers for subscriptions paid in advance of the services being provided .the following table presents changes in the deferred revenue balance for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2019 : for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2019 ( in millions ) .
[['', 'for the fiscal year ended june 30 2019 ( in millions )'], ['balance as of july 1 2018', '$ 510'], ['deferral of revenue', '3008'], ['recognition of deferred revenue ( a )', '-3084 ( 3084 )'], ['other', '-6 ( 6 )'], ['balance as of june 30 2019', '$ 428']]
( a ) for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2019 , the company recognized approximately $ 493 million of revenue which was included in the opening deferred revenue balance .contract assets were immaterial for disclosure as of june 30 , 2019 .practical expedients the company typically expenses sales commissions incurred to obtain a customer contract as those amounts are incurred as the amortization period is 12 months or less .these costs are recorded within selling , general and administrative in the statements of operations .the company also applies the practical expedient for significant financing components when the transfer of the good or service is paid within 12 months or less , or the receipt of consideration is received within 12 months or less of the transfer of the good or service .other revenue disclosures during the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2019 , the company recognized approximately $ 316 million in revenues related to performance obligations that were satisfied or partially satisfied in a prior reporting period .the remaining transaction price related to unsatisfied performance obligations as of june 30 , 2019 was approximately $ 354 million , of which approximately $ 182 million is expected to be recognized during fiscal 2020 , approximately $ 129 million is expected to be recognized in fiscal 2021 , $ 35 million is expected to be recognized in fiscal 2022 , $ 5 million is expected to be recognized in fiscal 2023 , with the remainder to be recognized thereafter .these amounts do not include ( i ) contracts with an expected duration of one year or less , ( ii ) contracts for which variable consideration is determined based on the customer 2019s subsequent sale or usage and ( iii ) variable consideration allocated to performance obligations accounted for under the series guidance that meets the allocation objective under asc 606 .note 4 .acquisitions , disposals and other transactions fiscal 2019 opcity in october 2018 , the company acquired opcity , a market-leading real estate technology platform that matches qualified home buyers and sellers with real estate professionals in real time .the total transaction value was approximately $ 210 million , consisting of approximately $ 182 million in cash , net of $ 7 million of cash .

Question: what was the value in millions of non cash assets for the transaction in which opcity was acquired?
Answer: 28
notes to consolidated financial statements the following table sets forth the activity related to the 2005 restructuring plan liabilities .( millions ) .
[['balance at january 1 2005', '$ 2014'], ['expensed in 2005', '141'], ['cash payments in 2005', '-23 ( 23 )'], ['foreign currency revaluation', '-2 ( 2 )'], ['balance at december 31 2005', '116'], ['expensed in 2006', '155'], ['cash payments in 2006', '-141 ( 141 )'], ['foreign currency revaluation', '4'], ['balance at december 31 2006', '134'], ['expensed in 2007', '38'], ['cash payments in 2007', '-110 ( 110 )'], ['foreign currency revaluation', '1'], ['balance at december 31 2007', '$ 63']]
aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities are included in both accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial position .aon corporation .

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?
Answer: -71
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis regulatory asset associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , in which entergy mississippi agreed not to pursue recovery of the costs deferred by an mpsc order in the new nuclear generation docket .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2014 net revenue', '$ 5735'], ['retail electric price', '187'], ['volume/weather', '95'], ['louisiana business combination customer credits', '-107 ( 107 )'], ['miso deferral', '-35 ( 35 )'], ['waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision', '-32 ( 32 )'], ['other', '-14 ( 14 )'], ['2015 net revenue', '$ 5829']]
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 formula rate plan increases at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 ; 2022 an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2015 and july 2014 , and new energy efficiency riders at entergy louisiana and entergy mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014 .energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income ; and 2022 an annual net rate increase at entergy mississippi of $ 16 million , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate and regulatory proceedings .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather .the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers .the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination .consistent with the terms of an agreement with the lpsc , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. .

Question: what percentage of net revenue of 2015 is attributed to the growth from to retail electric price?
Answer: 3.2%
.
[['( $ in millions except per share amounts )', 'year ended december 31 2014 1st qtr', 'year ended december 31 2014 2nd qtr', 'year ended december 31 2014 3rd qtr', 'year ended december 31 2014 4th qtr ( 3 )'], ['sales and service revenues', '$ 1594', '$ 1719', '$ 1717', '$ 1927'], ['operating income ( loss )', '159', '181', '171', '144'], ['earnings ( loss ) before income taxes', '132', '152', '144', '79'], ['net earnings ( loss )', '90', '100', '96', '52'], ['dividends declared per share', '$ 0.20', '$ 0.20', '$ 0.20', '$ 0.40'], ['basic earnings ( loss ) per share', '$ 1.83', '$ 2.05', '$ 1.97', '$ 1.07'], ['diluted earnings ( loss ) per share', '$ 1.81', '$ 2.04', '$ 1.96', '$ 1.05']]
( 3 ) in the fourth quarter of 2014 , the company recorded a $ 47 million goodwill impairment charge .item 9 .changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a .controls and procedures disclosure controls and procedures the company's management , with the participation of the company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer , has evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in rules 13a-15 ( e ) and 15d-15 ( e ) under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the "exchange act" ) ) as of december 31 , 2015 .based on that evaluation , the company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that , as of december 31 , 2015 , the company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the company files or submits under the exchange act is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in sec rules and forms , and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to management to allow their timely decisions regarding required disclosure .changes in internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended december 31 , 2015 , no change occurred in the company's internal control over financial reporting that materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the company's internal control over financial reporting. .

Question: what was the total sales as of december 312014 in millions
Answer: 6957
awards .awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the merger .awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc .and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc .prior to such date .at december 31 , 2009 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan .stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants .we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier .expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option .the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option .we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options .when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .the weighted- average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 3.79 , $ 4.36 and $ 6.49 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .
[['', '2009', '2008', '2007'], ['expected volatility', '28.7% ( 28.7 % )', '27.3% ( 27.3 % )', '23.5% ( 23.5 % )'], ['risk-free interest rate', '1.4% ( 1.4 % )', '1.7% ( 1.7 % )', '4.8% ( 4.8 % )'], ['dividend yield', '3.1% ( 3.1 % )', '2.9% ( 2.9 % )', '1.5% ( 1.5 % )'], ['expected life ( in years )', '4.2', '4.2', '4.0'], ['contractual life ( in years )', '7', '7', '7'], ['expected forfeiture rate', '3.0% ( 3.0 % )', '3.0% ( 3.0 % )', '5.0% ( 5.0 % )']]
republic services , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Question: what was the percentage decline in the weighted- average estimated fair values of stock options from 2007 to 2008
Answer: -32.8%
Explanation: the weighted- average estimated fair values of stock options from 2007 to 2008 declined by 32.8%
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .
[['year ended december 31 ( in millions )', '2009', '2008', '2007'], ['trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments', '$ 318063', '$ 384102', '$ 381415'], ['trading assets 2013 derivative receivables', '110457', '121417', '65439'], ['trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a )', '$ 60224', '$ 78841', '$ 94737'], ['trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables', '77901', '93200', '65198']]
( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased .note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value .elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis .elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year .2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis .2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities .( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction .the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .

Question: in 2008 what was the ratio of the trading assets derivatives - receivables to the payables
Answer: 1.72
entergy mississippi , inc .management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 17.9 million primarily due to the write-off in 2014 of the regulatory assets associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower net revenue .see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation .net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2015 net revenue', '$ 696.3'], ['retail electric price', '12.9'], ['volume/weather', '4.7'], ['net wholesale revenue', '-2.4 ( 2.4 )'], ['reserve equalization', '-2.8 ( 2.8 )'], ['other', '-3.3 ( 3.3 )'], ['2016 net revenue', '$ 705.4']]
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion on the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales .the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry. .

Question: how much cost would be passed on to customers , in millions , due to the retail electric price variance over the next 3 years?
Answer: 58.2