HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
the contracts were valued as of april 1 , 2002 , and an asset and a corresponding gain of $ 127 million , net of income taxes , was recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the second quarter of 2002 .the majority of the gain recorded relates to the warrior run contract , as the asset value of the deepwater contract on april 1 , 2002 , was less than $ 1 million .the warrior run contract qualifies and was designated as a cash flow hedge as defined by sfas no .133 and hedge accounting is applied for this contract subsequent to april 1 , 2002 .the contract valuations were performed using current forward electricity and gas price quotes and current market data for other contract variables .the forward curves used to value the contracts include certain assumptions , including projections of future electricity and gas prices in periods where future prices are not quoted .fluctuations in market prices and their impact on the assumptions will cause the value of these contracts to change .such fluctuations will increase the volatility of the company 2019s reported results of operations .11 .commitments , contingencies and risks operating leases 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the company was obligated under long-term non-cancelable operating leases , primarily for office rental and site leases .rental expense for operating leases , excluding amounts related to the sale/leaseback discussed below , was $ 31 million $ 32 million and $ 13 million in the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001and 2000 , respectively , including commitments of businesses classified as discontinued amounting to $ 6 million in 2002 , $ 16 million in 2001 and $ 6 million in 2000 .the future minimum lease commitments under these leases are as follows ( in millions ) : discontinued total operations .
[['', 'total', 'discontinued operations'], ['2003', '$ 30', '$ 4'], ['2004', '20', '4'], ['2005', '15', '3'], ['2006', '11', '1'], ['2007', '9', '1'], ['thereafter', '84', '1'], ['total', '$ 169', '$ 14']]
sale/leaseback 2014in may 1999 , a subsidiary of the company acquired six electric generating stations from new york state electric and gas ( 2018 2018nyseg 2019 2019 ) .concurrently , the subsidiary sold two of the plants to an unrelated third party for $ 666 million and simultaneously entered into a leasing arrangement with the unrelated party .this transaction has been accounted for as a sale/leaseback with operating lease treatment .rental expense was $ 54 million , $ 58 million and $ 54 million in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .future minimum lease commitments are as follows ( in millions ) : in connection with the lease of the two power plants , the subsidiary is required to maintain a rent reserve account equal to the maximum semi-annual payment with respect to the sum of the basic rent ( other then deferrable basic rent ) and fixed charges expected to become due in the immediately succeeding three-year period .at december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the amount deposited in the rent reserve account approximated .

Question: what was the average rental expense in millions for 2000 through 2002?
Answer: 55.3
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) f .marketable securities ( continued ) unrealized losses in the portfolio relate to various debt securities including u.s .government securities , u.s .government-sponsored enterprise securities , corporate debt securities and asset-backed securities .for these securities , the unrealized losses are primarily due to increases in interest rates .the investments held by the company are high investment grade and there were no adverse credit events .because the company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 .gross realized gains and losses for 2006 were $ 4000 and $ 88000 respectively .gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively .gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively .g .restricted cash at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the company held $ 30.3 million and $ 41.5 million respectively , in restricted cash .at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company 2019s landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements .h .property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was $ 25.4 million , $ 26.3 million and $ 28.4 million , respectively .in 2006 and 2005 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized .there was no effect on the company 2019s net property and equipment .additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated .the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 10000 for 2006 , $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 .i .altus investment altus pharmaceuticals , inc .( 201caltus 201d ) completed an initial public offering in january 2006 .as of the completion of the offering , vertex owned 817749 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1962494 shares of common stock ( the 201caltus warrants 201d ) .in addition , the company , as of the completion .
[['', '2006', '2005'], ['furniture and equipment', '$ 97638', '$ 98387'], ['leasehold improvements', '74875', '66318'], ['computers', '19733', '18971'], ['software', '21274', '18683'], ['total property and equipment gross', '213520', '202359'], ['less accumulated depreciation and amortization', '151985', '147826'], ['total property and equipment net', '$ 61535', '$ 54533']]
furniture and equipment $ 97638 $ 98387 leasehold improvements 74875 66318 computers 19733 18971 software 21274 18683 total property and equipment , gross 213520 202359 less accumulated depreciation and amortization 151985 147826 total property and equipment , net $ 61535 $ 54533 .

Question: what percent of the gross total property and equipment values in 2006 are related to computers?
Answer: 32%
notes to consolidated financial statements the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of related tax , are as follows: .
[['( millions ) as of december 31', '2007', '2006', '2005'], ['net derivative gains ( losses )', '$ 24', '$ 15', '$ -11 ( 11 )'], ['net unrealized investment gains', '76', '73', '52'], ['net foreign exchange translation', '284', '118', '-119 ( 119 )'], ['postretirement plans', '-1110 ( 1110 )', '-1216 ( 1216 )', '-1077 ( 1077 )'], ['accumulated other comprehensive loss', '$ -726 ( 726 )', '$ -1010 ( 1010 )', '$ -1155 ( 1155 )']]
aon corporation .

Question: what are the average net unrealized investment gains for the period?
Answer: 67
Explanation: it is the sum of all net unrealized investment gains divided by three .
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information .the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 .the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .price range of common stock .
[['2001 first quarter', 'high $ 60.15', 'low $ 41.30', '2000 first quarter', 'high $ 44.72', 'low $ 34.25'], ['second quarter', '52.25', '39.95', 'second quarter', '49.63', '35.56'], ['third quarter', '44.50', '12.00', 'third quarter', '70.25', '45.13'], ['fourth quarter', '17.80', '11.60', 'fourth quarter', '72.81', '45.00']]
( b ) holders .as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .( c ) dividends .under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay .in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty .the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was the 2001 first quarter average of high and low stock prices?
Answer: 50.73
part ii item 5 .market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2016 and 2015. .
[['2016', 'high', 'low'], ['quarter ended march 31', '$ 102.93', '$ 83.07'], ['quarter ended june 30', '113.63', '101.87'], ['quarter ended september 30', '118.26', '107.57'], ['quarter ended december 31', '118.09', '99.72'], ['2015', 'high', 'low'], ['quarter ended march 31', '$ 101.88', '$ 93.21'], ['quarter ended june 30', '98.64', '91.99'], ['quarter ended september 30', '101.54', '86.83'], ['quarter ended december 31', '104.12', '87.23']]
on february 17 , 2017 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 108.11 per share as reported on the nyse .as of february 17 , 2017 , we had 427195037 outstanding shares of common stock and 153 registered holders .dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) .generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) .we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , issued in may 2014 , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) .dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors .the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant .we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 3.2 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2017 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income. .

Question: what is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 17 , 2017?
Answer: 2792124
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index .the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions .there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .
[['', '2009', '2010', '2011', '2012', '2013', '2014'], ['vornado realty trust', '$ 100', '$ 123', '$ 118', '$ 128', '$ 147', '$ 201'], ['s&p 500 index', '100', '115', '117', '136', '180', '205'], ['the nareit all equity index', '100', '128', '139', '166', '171', '218']]
.

Question: what was the five year change in the s&p 500 index?
Answer: 105
net impairment we recognized $ 16.9 million and $ 14.9 million of net impairment during the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , on certain securities in our non-agency cmo portfolio due to continued deterioration in the expected credit performance of the underlying loans in those specific securities .the gross other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ) and the noncredit portion of otti , which was or had been previously recorded through other comprehensive income ( loss ) , are shown in the table below ( dollars in millions ) : year ended december 31 , 2012 2011 .
[['', 'year ended december 31 2012', '2011'], ['other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d )', '$ -19.8 ( 19.8 )', '$ -9.2 ( 9.2 )'], ['less : noncredit portion of otti recognized into ( out of ) other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( before tax )', '2.9', '-5.7 ( 5.7 )'], ['net impairment', '$ -16.9 ( 16.9 )', '$ -14.9 ( 14.9 )']]
provision for loan losses provision for loan losses decreased 20% ( 20 % ) to $ 354.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 compared to 2011 .the decrease in provision for loan losses was driven primarily by improving credit trends , as evidenced by the lower levels of delinquent loans in the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolios , and loan portfolio run-off .the decrease was partially offset by $ 50 million in charge-offs associated with newly identified bankruptcy filings during the third quarter of 2012 , with approximately 80% ( 80 % ) related to prior years .we utilize third party loan servicers to obtain bankruptcy data on our borrowers and during the third quarter of 2012 , we identified an increase in bankruptcies reported by one specific servicer .in researching this increase , we discovered that the servicer had not been reporting historical bankruptcy data on a timely basis .as a result , we implemented an enhanced procedure around all servicer reporting to corroborate bankruptcy reporting with independent third party data .through this additional process , approximately $ 90 million of loans were identified in which servicers failed to report the bankruptcy filing to us , approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of which were current at the end of the third quarter of 2012 .as a result , these loans were written down to the estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs , or approximately $ 40 million , during the third quarter of 2012 .these charge-offs resulted in an increase to provision for loan losses of $ 50 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the provision for loan losses has declined four consecutive years , down 78% ( 78 % ) from its peak of $ 1.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .we expect provision for loan losses to continue to decline over the long term , although it is subject to variability in any given quarter. .

Question: what was the percentage change in otti between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 115%
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 7 2014income taxes ( continued ) as of september 30 , 2006 , the company has state and foreign tax loss and state credit carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 55 million .certain of those carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 12 million , expire between 2016 and 2019 .a portion of these carryforwards was acquired from the company 2019s previous acquisitions , the utilization of which is subject to certain limitations imposed by the internal revenue code .the remaining benefits from tax losses and credits do not expire .as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , a valuation allowance of $ 5 million was recorded against the deferred tax asset for the benefits of state operating losses that may not be realized .management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities , will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets .a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : 2006 2005 2004 as restated ( 1 ) as restated ( 1 ) .
[['', '2006', '2005 as restated ( 1 )', '2004 as restated ( 1 )'], ['computed expected tax', '$ 987', '$ 633', '$ 129'], ['state taxes net of federal effect', '86', '-19 ( 19 )', '-5 ( 5 )'], ['indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries', '-224 ( 224 )', '-98 ( 98 )', '-31 ( 31 )'], ['nondeductible executive compensation', '11', '14', '12'], ['research and development credit net', '-12 ( 12 )', '-26 ( 26 )', '-5 ( 5 )'], ['other items', '-19 ( 19 )', '-24 ( 24 )', '4'], ['provision for income taxes', '$ 829', '$ 480', '$ 104'], ['effective tax rate', '29% ( 29 % )', '27% ( 27 % )', '28% ( 28 % )']]
( 1 ) see note 2 , 201crestatement of consolidated financial statements . 201d the company 2019s income taxes payable has been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock options .the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the option price , tax effected .the net tax benefits from employee stock option transactions were $ 419 million , $ 428 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) , and $ 83 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively , and were reflected as an increase to common stock in the consolidated statements of shareholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what was the 2005 tax expense?
Answer: $ 129.60
republic services , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the plan to reflect the allied acquisition .the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provides for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards .awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition .awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic prior to such date .as of december 31 , 2013 , there were approximately 15.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan .stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants .we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier .expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option .the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option .we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options .when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 5.27 , $ 4.77 and $ 5.35 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .
[['', '2013', '2012', '2011'], ['expected volatility', '28.9% ( 28.9 % )', '27.8% ( 27.8 % )', '27.3% ( 27.3 % )'], ['risk-free interest rate', '0.7% ( 0.7 % )', '0.8% ( 0.8 % )', '1.7% ( 1.7 % )'], ['dividend yield', '3.2% ( 3.2 % )', '3.2% ( 3.2 % )', '2.7% ( 2.7 % )'], ['expected life ( in years )', '4.5', '4.5', '4.4'], ['contractual life ( in years )', '7.0', '7.0', '7.0']]
.

Question: what was the growth of the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2012 to 2013
Answer: 10.5%
Explanation: the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted growth was 10.5% from 2012 to 2013