HangHor/FinQA_Normalized_ALL huggingface dataset:
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 281 pledged assets at december 31 , 2010 , assets were pledged to collateralize repur- chase agreements , other securities financing agreements , derivative transactions and for other purposes , including to secure borrowings and public deposits .certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged by the secured parties and are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consoli- dated balance sheets .in addition , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had pledged $ 288.7 billion and $ 344.6 billion , respectively , of financial instruments it owns that may not be sold or repledged by the secured parties .the significant components of the firm 2019s pledged assets were as follows. .
[['december 31 ( in billions )', '2010', '2009'], ['securities', '$ 112.1', '$ 155.3'], ['loans', '214.8', '285.5'], ['trading assets and other', '123.2', '84.6'], ['totalassetspledged ( a )', '$ 450.1', '$ 525.4']]
total assets pledged ( a ) $ 450.1 $ 525.4 ( a ) total assets pledged do not include assets of consolidated vies ; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities .see note 16 on pages 244 2013 259 of this annual report for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated vies .collateral at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had accepted assets as collateral that it could sell or repledge , deliver or otherwise use with a fair value of approximately $ 655.0 billion and $ 635.6 billion , respectively .this collateral was generally obtained under resale agreements , securities borrowing agreements , cus- tomer margin loans and derivative agreements .of the collateral received , approximately $ 521.3 billion and $ 472.7 billion were sold or repledged , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales and to collat- eralize deposits and derivative agreements .the reporting of collat- eral sold or repledged was revised in 2010 to include certain securities used to cover short sales and to collateralize deposits and derivative agreements .prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation .this revision had no impact on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets or its results of operations .contingencies in 2008 , the firm resolved with the irs issues related to compliance with reporting and withholding requirements for certain accounts transferred to the bank of new york mellon corporation ( 201cbnym 201d ) in connection with the firm 2019s sale to bnym of its corporate trust business .the resolution of these issues did not have a material effect on the firm. .

Question: what was the percent of the firm 2019s total pledged assets in 2010 that was loans
Answer: 47.7%
the contracts were valued as of april 1 , 2002 , and an asset and a corresponding gain of $ 127 million , net of income taxes , was recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the second quarter of 2002 .the majority of the gain recorded relates to the warrior run contract , as the asset value of the deepwater contract on april 1 , 2002 , was less than $ 1 million .the warrior run contract qualifies and was designated as a cash flow hedge as defined by sfas no .133 and hedge accounting is applied for this contract subsequent to april 1 , 2002 .the contract valuations were performed using current forward electricity and gas price quotes and current market data for other contract variables .the forward curves used to value the contracts include certain assumptions , including projections of future electricity and gas prices in periods where future prices are not quoted .fluctuations in market prices and their impact on the assumptions will cause the value of these contracts to change .such fluctuations will increase the volatility of the company 2019s reported results of operations .11 .commitments , contingencies and risks operating leases 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the company was obligated under long-term non-cancelable operating leases , primarily for office rental and site leases .rental expense for operating leases , excluding amounts related to the sale/leaseback discussed below , was $ 31 million $ 32 million and $ 13 million in the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001and 2000 , respectively , including commitments of businesses classified as discontinued amounting to $ 6 million in 2002 , $ 16 million in 2001 and $ 6 million in 2000 .the future minimum lease commitments under these leases are as follows ( in millions ) : discontinued total operations .
[['', 'total', 'discontinued operations'], ['2003', '$ 30', '$ 4'], ['2004', '20', '4'], ['2005', '15', '3'], ['2006', '11', '1'], ['2007', '9', '1'], ['thereafter', '84', '1'], ['total', '$ 169', '$ 14']]
sale/leaseback 2014in may 1999 , a subsidiary of the company acquired six electric generating stations from new york state electric and gas ( 2018 2018nyseg 2019 2019 ) .concurrently , the subsidiary sold two of the plants to an unrelated third party for $ 666 million and simultaneously entered into a leasing arrangement with the unrelated party .this transaction has been accounted for as a sale/leaseback with operating lease treatment .rental expense was $ 54 million , $ 58 million and $ 54 million in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .future minimum lease commitments are as follows ( in millions ) : in connection with the lease of the two power plants , the subsidiary is required to maintain a rent reserve account equal to the maximum semi-annual payment with respect to the sum of the basic rent ( other then deferrable basic rent ) and fixed charges expected to become due in the immediately succeeding three-year period .at december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the amount deposited in the rent reserve account approximated .

Question: total discontinued operations represent what percentage of total future minimum lease commitments?
Answer: 8%
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2002 2 .summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) stock-based compensation pca entered into management equity agreements in june 1999 with 125 of its management-level employees .these agreements provide for the grant of options to purchase up to an aggregate of 6576460 shares of pca 2019s common stock at $ 4.55 per share , the same price per share at which pca holdings llc purchased common stock in the transactions .the agreement called for these options to vest ratably over a five-year period , or upon completion of an initial public offering , full vesting with contractual restrictions on transfer for a period of up to 18 months following completion of the offering .the options vested with the initial public offering in january 2000 , and the restriction period ended august , 2001 .in october 1999 , the company adopted a long-term equity incentive plan , which provides for grants of stock options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock and performance awards to directors , officers and employees of pca , as well as others who engage in services for pca .option awards granted to officers and employees vest ratably over a four-year period , whereas option awards granted to directors vest immediately .under the plan , which will terminate on june 1 , 2009 , up to 4400000 shares of common stock is available for issuance under the long-term equity incentive plan .a summary of the company 2019s stock option activity , and related information for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 follows : options weighted-average exercise price .
[['', 'options', 'weighted-average exercise price'], ['balance january 1 2000', '6569200', '$ 4.55'], ['granted', '1059700', '11.92'], ['exercised', '-398138 ( 398138 )', '4.55'], ['forfeited', '-26560 ( 26560 )', '6.88'], ['balance december 31 2000', '7204202', '$ 5.62'], ['granted', '953350', '15.45'], ['exercised', '-1662475 ( 1662475 )', '4.59'], ['forfeited', '-16634 ( 16634 )', '11.18'], ['balance december 31 2001', '6478443', '$ 7.31'], ['granted', '871000', '19.55'], ['exercised', '-811791 ( 811791 )', '5.52'], ['forfeited', '-63550 ( 63550 )', '15.44'], ['balance december 31 2002', '6474102', '$ 9.10']]
clean proof : for cycle 12 .

Question: what is the total value of the balance of options as of december 31 , 2002 , in millions?
Answer: 58.9
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .
[['2011', '$ 82184'], ['2012', '77110'], ['2013', '75970'], ['2014', '75970'], ['2015', '75970'], ['thereafter', '390239'], ['total minimum lease payments', '777443'], ['less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments', '-357982 ( 357982 )'], ['net minimum lease payments', '419461'], ['less : amount representing interest', '-132490 ( 132490 )'], ['present value of net minimum lease payments', '286971'], ['less : current portion', '-24801 ( 24801 )'], ['long-term portion of capital lease obligations', '$ 262170']]
the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2010 is included in the commitments table in note 14 .10 .income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .as of december 31 , 2010 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes .the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 .in addition , there are $ 11 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 42 million of capital loss carryforwards which were fully offset by a valuation allowance .the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2011. .

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments are due in 2015?
Answer: 10%
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 7 2014income taxes ( continued ) as of september 30 , 2006 , the company has state and foreign tax loss and state credit carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 55 million .certain of those carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 12 million , expire between 2016 and 2019 .a portion of these carryforwards was acquired from the company 2019s previous acquisitions , the utilization of which is subject to certain limitations imposed by the internal revenue code .the remaining benefits from tax losses and credits do not expire .as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , a valuation allowance of $ 5 million was recorded against the deferred tax asset for the benefits of state operating losses that may not be realized .management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities , will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets .a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : 2006 2005 2004 as restated ( 1 ) as restated ( 1 ) .
[['', '2006', '2005 as restated ( 1 )', '2004 as restated ( 1 )'], ['computed expected tax', '$ 987', '$ 633', '$ 129'], ['state taxes net of federal effect', '86', '-19 ( 19 )', '-5 ( 5 )'], ['indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries', '-224 ( 224 )', '-98 ( 98 )', '-31 ( 31 )'], ['nondeductible executive compensation', '11', '14', '12'], ['research and development credit net', '-12 ( 12 )', '-26 ( 26 )', '-5 ( 5 )'], ['other items', '-19 ( 19 )', '-24 ( 24 )', '4'], ['provision for income taxes', '$ 829', '$ 480', '$ 104'], ['effective tax rate', '29% ( 29 % )', '27% ( 27 % )', '28% ( 28 % )']]
( 1 ) see note 2 , 201crestatement of consolidated financial statements . 201d the company 2019s income taxes payable has been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock options .the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the option price , tax effected .the net tax benefits from employee stock option transactions were $ 419 million , $ 428 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) , and $ 83 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively , and were reflected as an increase to common stock in the consolidated statements of shareholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what was the lowest effective tax rate in the three year period?
Answer: 27%
entergy mississippi , inc .management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 17.9 million primarily due to the write-off in 2014 of the regulatory assets associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower net revenue .see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation .net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2015 net revenue', '$ 696.3'], ['retail electric price', '12.9'], ['volume/weather', '4.7'], ['net wholesale revenue', '-2.4 ( 2.4 )'], ['reserve equalization', '-2.8 ( 2.8 )'], ['other', '-3.3 ( 3.3 )'], ['2016 net revenue', '$ 705.4']]
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion on the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales .the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry. .

Question: for 2016 , what percentage of net revenue was due to the retail electric price adjustment?
Answer: 1.8%
compensation plan approved by security holders .the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders .in connection with our mergers with cbot holdings and nymex holdings , we assumed their existing equity plans .the shares relating to the cbot holdings and nymex holdings plans are listed in the table below as being made under an equity compensation plan approved by security holders based upon the fact that shareholders of the company approved the related merger transactions .plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ...................1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ................5978 22.00 2014 .
[['plan category', 'number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a )', 'weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b )', 'number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )'], ['equity compensation plans approved by security holders', '1211143', '$ 308.10', '5156223'], ['equity compensation plans not approved by security holders', '5978', '22.00', '2014'], ['total', '1217121', '', '5156223']]
item 13 .certain relationships , related transactions and director independence the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201ccertain business relationships with related parties 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2014director independence 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201caudit committee disclosures 2014principal accountant fees and services 201d and 201caudit committee disclosures 2014audit committee policy for approval of audit and permitted non-audit services 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . .

Question: whats is the percentage of equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders?
Answer: 0.491%
Explanation: its the division between the equity compensation plans that were not approved and the total equity compensation plans .
other items on our consolidated financial statements have been appropriately adjusted from the amounts provided in the earnings release , including a reduction of our full year 2016 gross profit and income from operations by $ 2.9 million , and a reduction of net income by $ 1.7 million. .
[['( in thousands )', 'at december 31 , 2016', 'at december 31 , 2015', 'at december 31 , 2014', 'at december 31 , 2013', 'at december 31 , 2012'], ['cash and cash equivalents', '$ 250470', '$ 129852', '$ 593175', '$ 347489', '$ 341841'], ['working capital ( 1 )', '1279337', '1019953', '1127772', '702181', '651370'], ['inventories', '917491', '783031', '536714', '469006', '319286'], ['total assets', '3644331', '2865970', '2092428', '1576369', '1155052'], ['total debt including current maturities', '817388', '666070', '281546', '151551', '59858'], ['total stockholders 2019 equity', '$ 2030900', '$ 1668222', '$ 1350300', '$ 1053354', '$ 816922']]
( 1 ) working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. .

Question: what is the debt-to-equity ratio in 2016?
Answer: 40.2%
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) .
[['', 'amount ( in millions )'], ['2010 net revenue', '$ 5051'], ['mark-to-market tax settlement sharing', '-196 ( 196 )'], ['purchased power capacity', '-21 ( 21 )'], ['net wholesale revenue', '-14 ( 14 )'], ['volume/weather', '13'], ['ano decommissioning trust', '24'], ['retail electric price', '49'], ['other', '-2 ( 2 )'], ['2011 net revenue', '$ 4904']]
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases .the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors .weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers .industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 .entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions .increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments .the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income .the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 .these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .

Question: what is the percentage change in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -2.9%
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .
[['measurement pointdecember 31', 'the priceline group inc .', 'nasdaqcomposite index', 's&p 500index', 'rdg internetcomposite'], ['2011', '100.00', '100.00', '100.00', '100.00'], ['2012', '132.64', '116.41', '116.00', '119.34'], ['2013', '248.53', '165.47', '153.58', '195.83'], ['2014', '243.79', '188.69', '174.60', '192.42'], ['2015', '272.59', '200.32', '177.01', '264.96'], ['2016', '313.45', '216.54', '198.18', '277.56']]
.

Question: what was the percentage change in priceline group for the five year period ended 2016?
Answer: 213.45%