HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: albani@cadlab.sublink.org (Lanfranco Albani)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: DAT vs. 8mm
Date: 6 Oct 92 10:11:33 GMT
Organization: CAD.LAB S.p.A., Bologna, Italia

mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst) writes:

:>  DAT speeds of 187k/s and 8mm at 480k/s were quoted later. DAT with
:>compression
:>  can run at up to 700k/s. The real key is how fast the host will run. My
:>experience
:>  is that 8mm drives have smaller buffers and are easily underrun on
:
:Hmm. the 8mm units feature 1 Meg buffer and can run at about 2MB/s with
:compression.. so what ?


Our experience with Exa 8200 and Wangdat 2600 shows the same 
*REAL LIFE* transfer: 10Mb/minute, alas 175Kb/sec *SUSTAINED*.
The host is a DECsystem 5500, the scenario is our night-time
back-up of local disks (8 x 1Gb).

I don't care for peak measure... :-)

Bye, Lanfranco

-- 
Lanfranco Albani - CAD.LAB s.p.a., v. Ronzani 7/29, Casalecchio, Italia
Email: (work:) albani@cadlab.sublink.org, (home:) bob@allan.sublink.org
Phone: (work:) ++39 (51) 6130360, (home:) ++39 (51) 727372; 
Fax: ++39 (51) 6130294 (work only), Fidonet: 2:332/407.1138 (home only).
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: dabl2@nlm.nih.gov (Don A.B. Lindbergh)
Subject: Re: Need Adaptec UPGRADE.EXE via FTP
Organization: National Library of Medicine
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 14:10:21 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.000257.4821@desire.wright.edu> slam@desire.wright.edu writes:
>Can anyone point me to an ftp source where I can obtain Adaptec's
>UPGRADE program for their drivers? I have dialled their FTP site
>but the file is too big to warrant downloading at 2400 BAUD.
>
>Thanks!
>
>SC Lam - slam@eve.wright.edu

ftp to:

ftp.sg.com
/pub/adaptec

--Don Lindbergh
dabl2@lhc.nlm.nih.gov
From: alanlb@bethesda.cs.vt.edu (Alan L. Batongbacal)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Wanted: 4mm/8mm drive recommendations
Date: 14 Oct 92 18:58:38 GMT

Hi there!  I am considering the purchase of either a 4mm or 8mm
tape drive for backup purposes, to be connected alternately to
a generic 486-class machine with an Adaptec 1542, running Novell
netWare *and* to another 486 running ISC Unix 3.0.  I need something
in the 2GB capacity class.  Is there any particular make/model
e.g. Exabyte EXB-8200, that is generally held in high regard by this
group?

Thanks!

alan l. batongbacal
From: denham@hmsp04.wg3.waii.com (Scott Denham X7117)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: SCSI bad sectors?
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:19:11 GMT
Organization: Western Geo. - Div of Western Atlas Intn'l Inc., Houston, TX

In article <Bvsprw.6sE@iat.holonet.net> bwilliam@iat.holonet.net (Bill Williams) writes:
>You are wrong to assume that a Kilobyte of storage is only 1000 bytes CLEAR
>AND SIMPLE. The world of programmers has long ago agreed on the definition
>of a Megabyte of storage and a Kilobyte of storage. It is only
>non-programmers (marketing folks) and people who refuse to admit that they
>are incorrect that a Kilobyte of storage is not 2^10 bytes of storage and
>that a megabyte is not 2^20 bytes of storage.

It seems to me that the simple matter of consistency is enough to support
the powers-of-two approach. I think it's ludicrous to assert that one
megabyte of RAM won't fit on one megabyte of external storage.
From: thompson@vega.cs.utk.edu (Michelle Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Hooking an exabyte up between a sparc2 and a Wren V
Date: 15 Oct 92 19:43:30 GMT
Organization: university of tennessee
Distribution: world
Reply-To: thompson@vega.cs.utk.edu (Michelle Thompson)
NNTP-Posting-Host: vega.cs.utk.edu

I'm hooking up an EXB-8500 exabyte tape drive to a
sparc2.  I have it between the cpu and a Wren V scsi
drive.  The machine can't see the drive behind the
exabyte.  The targets are set correctly, and they aren't
the same.  The exabyte drive isn't terminated internally.
The Wren V is externally terminated.  We had it hooked up 
to a sparc1+ in exactly the same manner, and everything 
worked fine.  Any suggestions?
--Michelle Thompson
  UTK labstaff/sys admin
From: mendels1@husc4.harvard.edu (Andrew Mendelsohn)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Adaptec1542B<175??
Date: 7 Oct 92 18:03:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc3.1992Oct7.140334.16145
Distribution: world
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

I would like to know if anyone has found a source for Adaptec1542B or
Adaptec1540B SCSI  card (without the software kit) for under $175.
Thanks,
Andy Mendelsohn
mendels1@husc4.harvard.edu
From: coullet@ecu.unice.fr (Pierre Coullet)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: IEEE
Date: 9 Oct 92 17:20:34 GMT
Organization: University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis
NNTP-Posting-Host: ecu.unice.fr

Hi,

	What is the best system to interface to IEEE on the NeXT (Station  
or Cube) ? Speed ?

Thank you 
Pierre Coullet
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: strike@steam.rome.ny.us (Strikemaster)
Subject: SCSI bad sector handling
Organization: Iron Horse InfoSys
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 00:09:18 GMT

denham@hmsp04.wg3.waii.com (Scott Denham X7117) writes:

>It seems to me that the simple matter of consistency is enough to support
>the powers-of-two approach. I think it's ludicrous to assert that one
>megabyte of RAM won't fit on one megabyte of external storage. 

And let's either drop the thread, or return to the original subject.

How do you tell when a SCSI hard disk is developing problems?  It's been
three years now since this ST296N was installed, almost nine months of
non-stop running in the last twelve, and not a peep as far as bad sectors.
Given that SCSI drives handle errors internally without the OS being
informed, I'd like to know of impending doom before the smoke begins to
roll out of the cage.

E-mail is appreciated.


-- 
      Timothy B. Bowser; Sysadmin,       | strike@steam.rome.ny.us or try
    Chip Socketer & Tape Twiddler of     |    batcomputer!steam!strike
   The Iron Horse Information Service    |--------------------------------
----> "Advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo." <----
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
Subject: Re: DAT vs. 8mm
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f"ur Radioastronomie
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 22:39:47 GMT

In <1992Oct7.190135.2430@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> sherwood@fenris.space.ualberta.ca (Sherwood Botsford) writes:

>With compression our HP stores "up to 8 GB" on a 90 m tape.
>Now, if they are using a reasonable mix of files, this  
>works out to about 3 GB.  

Which depends on the 'reasonable mix'. The average home partition with
executables and lots of text files will surely get a compressio ratio
of 2-3 (i.e. 2.5-4GB per tape). Backing up numerical data will yield
really no compression.

>The streaming speed on this drive is also better than the  
>187 I quoted earlier.  "Sustained transfer 366-732 K/sec"
>Why the range, I don't know.  That may be using  

That's the effect of compression. If the drive cannot compress it
will transfer nothing more than 187k/s (or HP must have made a new
DAT drive type that is inherently faster).

Regards,
-- 
Michael van Elst
UUCP:     universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
Subject: Re: DAT vs. 8mm
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f"ur Radioastronomie
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 22:35:55 GMT

In <1992Oct06.101133.4698@cadlab.sublink.org> albani@cadlab.sublink.org (Lanfranco Albani) writes:
>mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
>:Hmm. the 8mm units feature 1 Meg buffer and can run at about 2MB/s with
>:compression.. so what ?


>Our experience with Exa 8200 and Wangdat 2600 shows the same 
>*REAL LIFE* transfer: 10Mb/minute, alas 175Kb/sec *SUSTAINED*.
>The host is a DECsystem 5500, the scenario is our night-time
>back-up of local disks (8 x 1Gb).

>I don't care for peak measure... :-)

True, your DECsystem is too slow to feed data fast enough. The major bottleneck
for a 'dump' is probably the disk. We have DECstation 5000/125,200 and 240.
The 5000/125 can sustain about 450k/s from a local disk when writing with
tar directly to the tape but you must not use the machine for anything else.
And that's not peak measure. Our average file size is about 300kbyte which
of cause helps, copying a home partition with tons of small files will of
course never reach that speed.

Regards,
-- 
Michael van Elst
UUCP:     universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
From: marie@Redwood.XAIT.Xerox.COM (Marie Reale)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: WangDat 4mm (Stacker)
Date: 14 Oct 92 19:30:03 GMT
Reply-To: marie@Redwood.XAIT.Xerox.COM (Marie Reale)
Organization: Xerox Advanced Information Technology, Cambridge, MA

We are running SunOs 4.1.2 and are having trouble with our 4mm WangDAT
stacker. We are also running a software product called Networker for
automatic backups.  It seems that the os does not recognize the drive
and assumes it to be .25 cartridge.  Also, somehow the os thinks it
has reached the end of tape when it has not and Networker will eject
the tape and remount a new one.  I know that Sun does not support this 
yet but is there any scsi target device driver infomation available for 
this tape drive or any 4mm tape drive that would help running under
4.1.2.?

Any help is very much appreciated.

-- 
^   ^	Marie Reale 
-   o	
  v	XAIT, Cambridge MA  02142
\___/	marie@xait.xerox.com (617)499-4408
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: eric@telebit.com (Eric Smith)
Subject: Problems using Exabyte 8200 w/ Corel SCSI & 1542B
X-Disclaimer: Everything I write is false.
Organization: Telebit Corporation
Date: 15 Oct 92 23:33:36

I just bought an Adaptec 1542B+ kit to replace my old 1542A (anyone want a
1542A?), and I thought I'd try to use the Corel backup software with an
Exabyte 8mm drive.  Both the DOS and Windows versions of their backup software
recognize the drive, but report an error setting the block size if I try to
format a tape, or write a backup.

I called Corel tech support, and they asked what version of the firmware
the drive had.  I didn't want to open up the drive (it's not mine), but I told
them their scan program reports it as version 251K.

They said I needed to get new EPROMs for the servo board (#SVC034), and for
the comm board (#2640).

I doubt that I can get the owner of the drive to get a firmware upgrade, since
the drive works fine on Suns.  I tried another drive, which reports version
252X, and it did the same thing.  These are both fairly new drives, so I
really can't imagine that the firmware is very buggy.  It sounds to me like
their driver doesn't understand the drive too well.

Has anyone else been successful using Corel SCSI with an Exabyte?

If I can't get it to work, I'll try to get a refund, because the main reason
I bought it was so I could use this tape drive.

Cheers,
Eric
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: xzz0638@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Dave Larve)
Subject: Corel and OS/2 Version 1.3
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 13:29:48 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester
Keywords: Corel OS/2 Tahiti

I have been unsuccessful in getting the following combination of products
to work together: Corel Driver or Corel SCSI, IBM PS/2 Model 80,
MaxOptix Tahiti-2 MO Drives, and OS/2 Version 1.3.

My problem is one regarding an upgrade from Toshiba WORM Drives to the
MaxOptix Tagiti-2 MO Drives.  Corel Driver did not support the Tahiti-2.  I
upgraded to Corel SCSI but have been unable to figure out how to get the
ASPI drivers for my adapter card.  I think I should be looking for the ASPI
drivers for my Adaptek AHA-1640 SCSI Card and the device drivers need to be
usable in OS/2 Version 1.3.  Does OS/2 Version 1.3 support ASPI?  It has
been suggested I go to OS/2 Version 2.0, does anyone know if this would help?

Any help is appreciated.
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: kevinn@kpc.com (Kevin Nguyen)
Subject: Testing
Reply-To: kevinn@kpc.com
Organization: Kubota Pacific Computer Inc.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 21:48:30 GMT

This is a test
-- 

Kevin Nguyen				Kubota Pacific Computer Inc.
Internet E-mail kevinn@kpc.com		uucp E-mail kpc.com!kevinn
From: cummings@natinst.com (Rodney Cummings)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Extended message rejection
Date: 13 Oct 1992 19:05:41 -0500
Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: falcon.natinst.com

A question regarding SCSI spec interpretation...

If a SCSI-2 target does not implement ANY of the extended messages (such as
SYNCHRONOUS DATA TRANSFER REQUEST), when should the MESSAGE REJECT
be sent to the initiator... after the first byte of the extended
message, or after all bytes of the extended message have been received?

From my reading of the spec (specifically 5.6.14), it seems like the
first byte should be rejected, but one likes to be certain...

-- 
     Rodney Cummings            cummings@natinst.com
     National Instruments       Austin, Texas
From: garyf@wang.com (Gary Field)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: SCSI bus termination
Date: 15 Oct 92 13:50:26 GMT
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA

jdp@caleb.UUCP (Jim Pritchett) writes:

>In a certain configuration, I get intermittent SCSI errors even though the
>system is properly terminated.  (i.e. two Quantum 105S and an Archive 2150S.)
>Someone suggested that I try reversing the terminators.  Is this a good idea?
>Why would reversing the resistor packs reduce SCSI bus "noise" (or whatever?)

>Also, what is a good and reasonably priced source for DB-25 plug-in terminators?


>                                     Thanks,

>                                                Jim Pritchett

I think what they mean is to make sure that you have the resistor packs
properly inserted. They can be plugged in backwards and the result is
that the termination will consist of 330 Ohm pullups and 220 Ohm pulldowns.
This is opposite of what you want but might work enough to fool you. Make
sure the end that is connected to the 220 Ohm resistors is connected to
+ 5 Volts. Also make sure that your terminator power is between 4.2V and
5.1 Volts. Another word of warning since you mentioned DB-25 terminators.
Don't use DB-25 anything for SCSI. The grounding is not proper and will
only cause problems. If your host adapter card has a DB-25 on it, use an
adapter cable to bring it out to the standard 50 pin centronics style
connector and make all your connections using those. Terminators are
available is this style (but they're fairly expensive $15 or so).

Gary

-- 

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Gary A. Field - WA1GRC, Wang Labs M/S 019-72B, 1 Industrial Ave      
   Lowell, MA 01851-5161,  (508) 967-2514, email: garyf@wiis.wang.com
-----------  Anything not worth doing, is not worth doing well. -----------*/
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: fpm@crash.cts.com (Frank Maclachlan)
Subject: Need jumper info for Siemens 2300 hard drive
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
Date: 15 Oct 92 11:34:46 PDT

I have a Siemens 2300 SCSI hard drive and need option jumper information.
This is a 5 1/4" full high drive which formats to 261 mb.  Any help
would be appreciated.  Send email to fpm@crash.cts.com.  Thanks in
advance.
--
UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd ucsd nosc}!crash!fpm
ARPA: crash!fpm@nosc.mil
INET: fpm@crash.cts.com

Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: moogoo@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Mark Morris)
Subject: Re: AT&T SCSI Definition Manul
Organization: NCR StarServer Business Unit
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 01:32:50 GMT

In article <798@mesrx.UUCP> ar097@mesrx.UUCP (anand ramamurthy) writes:

>I would like to know how I can obtain  AT&T SCSI Definition Manul, who
>is the publisher and author? I tried several places including
>Prentice-Hall and Simon abd Schuster. The people at the numbers I
>called could not help.
>
>anandR

Try the AT&T Customer Information Center
	1-800-432-6600 (Toll Free - U.S.)
	1-800-255-1242 (Toll Free - Canada)
	1-317-352-8557 (Toll - Worldwide)

The AT&T SCSI Definition Manual has a Select Code of 305-013.

-- 
  Mark Morris                              INTERNET: moogoo@iwtin.att.com
  NCR SCSI Driver Development              VOICE:    (708)-979-8134 
  NCR StarServer Business Unit             FAX:      (708)-979-7905
  1100 East Warrenville Rd (MS 2Z-214)     Naperville, IL 60566
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: jim@jagubox.gsfc.nasa.gov (Jim Jagielski)
Subject: block address of compression tape drives
Reply-To: jim@jagubox.gsfc.nasa.gov (Jim Jagielski)
Organization: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 12:32:28 GMT

I've got a question concerning physical block number for compression tape
drives as well as spacing for them.

First of all, let's assume that the physical block size is 1k and with
the data stream I'm sending it, every 1k chunk compresses to 512b.

Now I write 8k of data to the tape, but it only "takes up" 4k of tape.
Is the current block address 8 (since I sent 8k of data) or 4 (since
it onlt took 4 blocks of tape space)?? In a related question, if I wish
to SPACE to the "middle" of the data, would I SPACE 4 blocks from BOT
or 2?

I guess the real question is does the "outside" world know about the
compression being done or is this totally insulated?

Thanks!
-- 
    Jim Jagielski               | "It is not I who am crazy...
    jim@jagubox.gsfc.nasa.gov   |  it is I who am MAD!"
    NASA/GSFC, Code 734.4       |
    Greenbelt, MD 20771         |            - Ren
From: atam@zeus.calpoly.edu (Alexander W Tam)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: SCSI-1 CD-ROM
Date: 7 Oct 92 06:51:15 GMT
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

I have a NEC CDR-84 internal CD-ROM drive. It was used to
install NT on my machine. However, the pre-release version of
NT doesn't support SCSI-1 CD-ROM for audio playback.  i.e. I
cannot listen to musical CDs under NT right now.  Anybody knows
whether the next version, may be beta release due in the end
of October, of NT will support SCSI-1 CD-ROM so that I can use
the "CDPlayer" utility?

By the way, does anyone have a SCSI-2 CD-ROM successfully play
musical CDs under NT using the 'CDPlayer' program?

Alex

atam@poseidon.calpoly.edu
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: nbladt@autelca.ascom.ch (Norbert Bladt)
Subject: Re: Quantum PRO-105S problem
Organization: Ascom Autelca AG, Guemligen, Switzerland
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:38:51 GMT

jdp@caleb.UUCP (Jim Pritchett) writes:

>Recently I posted a query about a problem I had with 2 Quantum PRO-105S drives
>that worked fine separately, but would generate intermittent SCSI errors when
>used together on the same controller (GVP 030 SCSI.)  The first time I called
>Quantum, the guy assured me that there was no problem with the drives.  I called
>again today and another guy told me that there is an updated ROM which should
>fix the problem.  He promised to send me the new ROMs.  I hope this information
>helps someone out there.
Did you knew that you have to change the SCSI-Id (address) for one of the
drives ?
And perhaps remove the bus-terminator on one of those, too ?

Just in case ...

I doubt that this is the reason, but still it might help.

Norbert Bladt.
-- 
Norbert Bladt, Ascom Autelca AG, Worbstr. 201, CH-3073 Guemligen, Switzerland
Phone: +41 31 999 65 52			FAX: +41 31 999 65 44
Mail: nbladt@autelca.ascom.ch   UUCP: ..!uunet!mcsun!chsun!hslrswi!aut!nbladt
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: mcconnel@b11.b11.ingr.com (Guy McConnell)
Subject: Re: DAT vs. 8mm
Reply-To: mcconnel@b11.b11.ingr.com (Guy McConnell)
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 21:29:49 GMT

In article <Bvt1xp.6oy@ddsw1.mcs.com> karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
>
>Also, an 8mm drive requires a full-height mounting bay, while a DAT will
>mount in a half-height.

    Unless, of course, you have one of the half-high 8mm drives.  I
have two of the 8205 drives as well as two of the 8505 units.  Very
nice indeed.

>Does anyone HAVE the new Archive Turbo-Dat drive?

    I have yet to see one of these.

--
========================================================================
Guy D. McConnell, Intergraph Corp.|        |All that is gold does not
Huntsville, AL.  35894-0001       | These  |glitter, not all those who
Mail Stop CR1105                  |opinions|wander are lost, the old
Computer and Storage Technology   |are mine|that is strong does not
Evaluation Group - Tape Products  |and mine|wither, and deep roots are
guy@mspe5.b11.ingr.com            | alone. |not reached by the frost.
 205-730-6289   FAX  205-730-6011 |        |                J.R.R.T.
========================================================================
From: merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: MS Windows 3.1 SMARTDRV cache program vs. Adaptec 1542b Controller
Date: 12 Oct 1992 00:50:43 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: neuro.usc.edu
Keywords: adaptec,aspidisk,scsi,cache

MS Windows 3.1 README files and the Windows 3.1 Resource Kit state you must
set VirtualHDIrq=Off in the [386enh] section of SYSTEM.INI for SCSI disks.

It seems you also have to install smartdrv in both config.sys & autoexec.bat
to get decent performance without disrupting windows operations.  I have the
new Adaptec 1542b ROMs, the new ASPI software upgrade from the Adaptec BBS,
DOS 5.0, Windows 3.1, MS C/C++ 7.0, and the Windows 3.1 SDK installed.  

Many other configuration settings didn't work -- but the following CONFIG.SYS 
and AUTOEXEC.BAT files effectively used cache to raise Norton SI performance 
from 3.1 to 8.8 or more depending on some as yet undetermined parameters.

N.B. Double buffering does not appear to be necessary in this configuration.

N.B. This setup does not enable write caching.  Write cache didn't appear to
give me any performance gain.  Write caching also substantually increases the
risk of disk corruption due to power fail/system shutdown without writing the
cached data to disk.  I am open to counter evidence regarding performance.

Any other suggestions about improving hard disk reliability or performance
would be most welcome.

AJ Annala

p.s.  My boot disk is a 400 MB version of the IBM 0661 -- this disk requires
the latest Adaptec ROMs (1992) and an inline SCSI terminator between the disk
and the cable running to the controller to work correctly.  The IBM 0661 has
no internal terminator.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIG.SYS
----------
buffers=30
FILES=20
device=c:\adaptec\aspi4dos.sys /D 
device=c:\adaptec\aspidisk.sys
device=C:\WINDOWS\HIMEM.SYS
DEVICE=C:\DOS\SETVER.EXE
DOS=HIGH, UMB
SHELL=C:\DOS\COMMAND.COM C:\DOS\ /e:4096 /p
device=c:\windows\smartdrv.sys 1024 512 /B- 
device=c:\combutil\mouse.sys
device=c:\dos\ansi.sys
LASTDRIVE=V
STACKS=9,256

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTOEXEC.BAT
------------
PATH=C:\WINDEV\BIN;C:\WINDOWS;c:\dos;c:\
Set LIB=C:\WINDEV\LIB;C:\WINDEV\MFC\LIB
Set INCLUDE=C:\WINDEV\INCLUDE;C:\WINDEV\MFC\INCLUDE
Set HELPFILES=C:\WINDEV\HELP\*.HLP;c:\windev\help
Set INIT=C:\WINDEV\INIT
Set TMP=c:\tmp
Set TEMP=c:\tmp
rem C:\WINDOWS\SMARTDRV.EXE /L
c:\windows\smartdrv.exe a b c 
SET TEMP=c:\tmp
SET GSFONTS=H:\GSFONTS
type c:\dos\motd


Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi