HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bob@consult.UUCP (Bob Willey)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PPI modems...
Date: 29 Dec 92 03:34:25 GMT
Reply-To: bob@consult.UUCP (Bob Willey)
Organization: CCS Enterprises, Inc.

In article <gDq0VB1w164w@admiral.uucp> spyder@admiral.uucp (Eric) writes:
>Does any sysop out there actually have a PPI modem that works as well
>as your old 2400?...problem-free?...This is my second PPI 14.4FXSA
>and its even worse than the last one...this time, I can't handshake
>and negotiate with anyone like last time, and my board gets killed 
>The Admiral's Public UNIX - Greenwich, CT - System Administrator: Doug Fields
>(HST/V32) (203)661-2873 -- (PEP/V32) -1279 -- (V32) -0450 -- (V29/MNP6) -2967
>>FREE!< Unix shell accounts, Usenet access, and Internet-style mail available

Well, I am not sure what kind of problems you are having, but we have
been using a PM14400FXSA for some time now on our BBS and have had
NO PROBLEMS!!!  Big ZERO....

It works great, callers from 300 to 14,400 (with transfers around 1650cps).
So everything appears to be fine.
What software are you using???  That could be the problem.
We use PCBoard 14.5a/10 and you are welcome to call us to see if you
can connect alright, but I as sure it will be fine.
And we have users beating on the system since we have about 15,000 programs
of freeware/shareware on here and everyone downloading till their hearts
content.

-- 
>.. Bob Willey, CDP          ..  |  ..  uunet!consult!bob  bob@ccs.com   ..<
>.. CCS Enterprises, Inc.    ..  |  ..   Office: (410) 820-4670          ..<
>.. P.O. Drawer 1690         ..  |  ..      FAX: (410) 476-5261          ..<
>.. Easton, Maryland 21601 ......|......... BBS: (410) 476-5098 ...........<
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.os.os2.misc
From: marks@netcom.com (Mark Sherred)
Subject: Re: Have I been hosed?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 09:59:10 GMT

Oops!  I guess I should have taken a closer look at my National Data book.

NS16550 - has FIFO's but they can't be used due to bug. Limited production.
NS16550AF - working FIFO's

There is no mention of a NS16550A.
From: RAF@CU.NIH.GOV ("Roger Fajman")
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re:  Can you make a 7-bit terminal w/ZyXEL talk to a 8-bit
          system?
Date: 22 Dec 92 20:03:54 GMT
Organization: The Internet

> I have a Zenith-29A terminal that I normally use for a dialup.  I have
> used this setup without incident until I bought my new ZyXEL.  There is
> nothing wrong with the modem, but the Zenith will only generate 7E1.
> This was fine when I was calling the slow modems, but all of the fast
> modems at school expect 8N1.

If your terminal really only supports even parity (the E in 7E1), then
it sounds like you are out of luck.  But if it can be set to space
parity, it should work.  Space parity with 7 data bits looks the same
on the line as 8 data bits with no parity for 7 bit characters.

Roger Fajman                                   Telephone:  +1 301 402 1246
National Institutes of Health                  BITNET:     RAF@NIHCU
Bethesda, Maryland, USA                        Internet:   RAF@CU.NIH.GOV
From: rick.franks@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (Rick Franks) 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: NEW MEMBER
Date: 24 Dec 92 13:15:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: HAL 9000 BBS, (313)663-4173, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Reply-To: rick.franks@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (Rick Franks) 

The folks down here in Myrtle Beach SC, would like to say hello
to you up in W-NET. And would like to inform you'all we are now
cross-linking this confernece with our own BUM_NET network.
Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year...
---
 . Cam-Mail . The Chess Board BBS. The BEST in CHESS. (803)236-7711
                                                                             
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: ddavis@highlite.uucp (Darrel L. Davis)
Subject: 9600 baud on AT&T 3B2
Summary: Connecting a modem to 3B2
Keywords: modem, 3B2
Organization: Gotham Communications Research
Distribution: comp
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 19:21:00 GMT

I need information regarding hooking up a 9600 baud modem to 
an AT&T 3B2/500 so that it can be used as both dial-in AND
dial-out.  The 3B2 has 8-pin rj45 ports and it seems to be a 
problem juggling signals.

If anyone is having success, could you please give me
the pertinent switch/register settings and possibly a
pin-out for the connector your using?

Thanks
darrel

-- 

Darrel L. Davis:  ddavis@gotham.com  ddavis@highlite.uucp  uunet!highlite!ddavis
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: lawrence@combdyn.com (Lawrence Chen)
Subject: Re: HELP! problems with 2-line phones
Organization: Combustion Dynamics Ltd.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:12:44 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.143202.20023@qiclab.scn.rain.com> Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org writes:
>joel@writer.yorku.ca (Joel Atkin) writes:
>
>>Help!  My supra v.32bis modem, which is billed as handling line noise
>>fairly well, drops the carrier every time my other line rings.  I have
>>5 two line phones hooked up throughout my house on sockets I've wired
>>for two lines.  When I remove all of the phones, presto!, carrier is
>>not dropped when the other line rings.  I have tried each phone
>>individually and they all seem to cause line noise on the other line
>>(line2) when line1 rings.  These phones are essential and I was
>>wondering if there was some way to suppress this overlapping effect.
>
>Many modems use the 2nd pair on the jack as if it was an old fashioned
>"key system" multiline phone. So what you want to avoid both having
>the phones interefere with the modem *and* the modem interfere with the 
>phone is a little gizmo from Radio shack that splits the 2-line jack into
>3 jacks. A 2-line jack, a line 1 jack, and a line 2 jack. The single
>line jacks have *only* the 2 wires required brought thru and that eliminates
>most problems.
>
I had forgotten about this posibility....I have a GE answering machine that
seems to exhibit this behaviour.  I found that people couldn't hear the OGM,
if the modem line was active.  Now that its on a FAX/PHONE switcher that
doesn't pass the 2nd pair, the problem has disappeared.

However, the FAX/PHONE switcher doesn't detect extension pickups and the
answering machine still gets connected to the line.  Actually, it'll detect
extension pickups after the machine kicks in, but not before.  By then most
people who call me hang up when they hear the machine.  I'm starting to think
that I should put a modem directly on the line and not bother with voice
callers anymore.
-- 
 --EMAIL-----------------------------PHONE-----------FAX------------
 | WORK: lawrence@combdyn.com      | (403)529-2162 | (403)529-2516 |
 | HOME: dreamer@lhaven.uumh.ab.ca | (403)526-6019 | (403)529-5102 |
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
  disclamer = (working_for && !representing) + (Combustion Dynamics Ltd.);
From: davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Digicom Scout modem
Date: 2 Jan 93 03:54:18 GMT

wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke) writes:

>Dave McLane (davidg@aegis.or.jp) wrote:
>: The manual says that *G0 disables the adaptive handshake, so I got
>: the feeling that it would either make the CONNECT at the max speed
>: or give up. But mabye not, could you explain the difference between
>: *G0 and *G1 in some detail? 

>The manual is not completely correct in this respect. Try connecting
>with *G0 on a bad line, with lets say signal quality 4 to 5. Most
>likely it will result in a connection, but at maybe 12,000 bps or so.
....
>I dont usually recommend *G0. Only if I get a report that the Scout+
>will not connect at 14,400 bps somewhere, and the signal quality is
>5+ or better, will it work well. If its 5 or below, then it will result
>in higher speeds, like 12,000 bps instead of 9600 bps, but the line
>does then not allow 14,400 bps.
....

So then the first thing is to use SQ to check the Signal Quality. 

If you have connected at too low a rate and you find that SQ=5 or 6,
can you change to *G0 and get a retrain with ATO or something?

Dave

--
Dave McLane 
JUNET: davidg@aegis.or.jp (ONLY within Japan: post otherwise)
Nagaokakyoshi, Kyoto Japan Tel: +81-75-951-1168 Fax: +81-75-957-1087
From: heiser@acs.bu.edu (William Heiser)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hayes lawyers intimidate competition (was: Hayes Press Release)
Date: 3 Jan 93 18:35:26 GMT
Organization: Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1i5ti3INN9ic@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes:
>This isn't true -- Telebit has started shipping the T3000/WorldBlazer
>FAX upgrades, although I'm not sure that you can buy a T3000 or WB
>with the FAX ROMs already installed.

OK, so then they've JUST come out with it.  Was this big flap a while back
about whether or not the Telebit would correctly handle inbound FAX/DATA
calls ever settled?  Does the T3000/Worldblazer with FAX upgrade work 
better than the first WB's they shipped?   :-) :-)

Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to dump on Telebit - I happen to think
they are great modems.  Originally my comment was in response to someone
who said Hayes modems wwere over priced, and I was comparing them to 
Telebits to prove that they aren't overpriced.  (Even if the TElebit
*does* do FAX it is still more expensive than the Hayes).
From: wilken@plains.NoDak.edu (Scott Wilken)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Digicom Scout modem
Date: 28 Dec 92 21:14:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.BzzMzw.Lzp
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <1992Dec23.173220.20710@yang.earlham.edu> markp@cranham.cc.earlham.edu writes:
>
>Why is it that only the internal version has the 16550AFN chip?

Because the 16550 is a UART.  These are the parallel/serial converters
found in serial ports.  Since an internal has an onboard serial port, it of
course needs a UART.  An external has no hardware in it that deals with
your serial port directly..  Its just a DTE device.

Scott

-- 
Go FAST!            |  Internet:  wilken@plains.nodak.edu   |     AMA #587126 
Take Chances!       |     UUCP: ..!uunet!plains!wilken      |     DoD #0087 
VF700F Interceptor  |        Bitnet:  WILKEN@PLAINS         |   
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: acook@athena.mit.edu (Andrew R Cook)
Subject: Re: Need suggestions for high speed modem / PPI bashing
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:56:23 GMT

In article <2B3E29D6.132@ics.uci.edu>, you write:
|> Dear all,
|> 
|> 	I plan to purchase an external high speed( > 9600 Baud) fax modem, can
|> anyone suggest one for me ?  My budget limit will be $400 and if you know of
|> any mail order place, please inform me too(Tax is high in California).  Thanks
|> in advance.
|> 
|> --Billy

Hi

I would highly suggest PC Connection (Marlow, NH - look in any PC rag).  I
have bought many things from them, and have found them to be fast, curteous,
and to have good customer support.  Last week, I bought a Practical Peripherals
PM14400FXSA modem from them, and got it the next day.  It had problems, and
they sent me out another on the next day (the day before Christmas!), no
problem.  I even got them to schedule a pick-up for the dead modem by the
shipping company, that way I did not need to hassle with shipping it back myself
(or paying the shipping!).  

About the PPI PM14400FXSA: I would highly suggest it, even though my first one
showed up dead.  PC Connection sold it to me for $399 (external model) with
WinFax Pro thrown in free.  PPI's tech support was very good at diagnosing the 
problem with my original modem, and told me to send it back.  My only gripe
with PPI is that the manual is pretty technical, and if you are not used to
using modems, can be tough to decipher.  Though for many people I'm sure this 
is a plus (its a good reference), I still don't know how to do a bunch of things.
I would be nice if they would include sections with examples for people using
standard software (procomm, kermit, etc...).  This is my first 2400+ modem, so
I didn't know much about v.32, .32bis, .42, .42bis, MNP2-5, etc....  I guess
I'm still a bit in the dark.  I'm pretty happy though.  It brings a big smile
to your face the first time you see big transfer rates !

Andy Cook
acook@athena.mit.edu


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rudi@igc.ethz.ch (Rudi van Drunen)
Subject: Ftp site for ZyXEL firmware
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Summary: Where to find ZyXEL roms
Reply-To: rudi@chem.rug.nl
Organization: Computational Chemistry, ETH, Zuerich
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 16:17:22 GMT

Hello Netters !!

First of all: Happy holidays (THE time to do something usefull with computers
as they are not as overloaded as usual (Here at least)).

Ok. The question is : does anyone know a FTP siter where I can find
the images for the ROM update for the ZyXEL modems, together with the
release notes ?? I suppose it must be somewhere ... Please mail me.

Thanks !!

Rudi.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: calvert@QueensU.CA (John Calvert)
Subject: Request comments on PC Logic 14,4 fax/modem
Organization: Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:35:10 GMT

I just bought a PC Logic 14,4 fax/modem v.32bis v.42bis to replace
a GVC 96/24 fax/modem, but I'm having a number of problems:

1. Only able to comment to 9600 dial in lines, the 2400 lines I was
   was using with the GVC time-out or have no carrier detected.

2. The 9600 connection takes about 50% longer than the 2400 used to.

3. Transfers fail after about 10K. Using Y-modem batch

4. Transfers that succeed (< 10K) are not that much faster than the
   2400 was. 300cps compared to 200cps.

5. Character set suddenly becomes partially corrupted. It is as if
   about half the alphabet has been permuted. I can still recognize
   prompts because they are the same length, and about half the
   characters are correct.

None of this ever happended with the GVC on the 2400 lines. Of course
I can't test the new modem on the old lines because it won't connect.
Other than changing the comm software modem speed and the phone number
everything else was the same.

Any ideas?

-- 
John Calvert

calvert@mast.queensu.ca
From: heiser@acs.bu.edu (William Heiser)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hayes V.series 9600 Smartmodem. Question
Date: 3 Jan 93 23:24:48 GMT
Organization: Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <C0ArLv.B3p@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> dhuey@cayley.uwaterloo.ca writes:
>I tried in vain to connect at 9600 with other BBSs that have v32 and v32.bis modems.  My friend says that this older modem has v32.
>

If I'm not mistaken, the V-series uses a proprietary protocol for use at 
high speeds, although they use standard protocols for low-speed connections.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: world
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 09:29:01 -0800
From: Zero_One@p101.f701.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Subject: My experience w/ my new ZyXel 1496E
Comment-To: Geoffrey_Welsh@p101.f701.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Reply-To: Zero_One@p101.f701.n202.z1.fidonet.org
X-FSC-PATH: 202/701

 > paul@tct.com (Paul Levin) writes:

 >> I found the command to get the firmware version number (it was a
fax
 >> command, why ?).

 >    What's wrong with "ATI0"?

 >>     Can someone tell me the phone number to ZyXel USA's buliten
board ?

 >    1-714-693-0762

 >>     I assume they have a ZyXel modem there, and I can test the
16.8.

 >    Be prepared for disappointment: 16.8 kbps is not very robust.

 >>     Also, I want to download the latest firmware.  How is that
done ?

 >    They do not have the latest firmware posted.  The bulletin
 > about buying
 > EPROM upgrades mentions an even older version.

We always post the latest ROMS on our bbs for downloading.

Tyrone Horton
(Zero One)
Tech Support
ZyXEL USA

--- FMail 0.92
 * Origin: ZyXEL USA (1:202/701.101)
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: My experience w/ my new ZyXel 1496E
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 93 12:24:10 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

Zero_One@p101.f701.n202.z1.fidonet.org writes:

> We always post the latest ROMS on our bbs for downloading.

   There was no sign of a ROM image on the ZyXEL USA BBS when I called a 
couple of weeks ago.  There was a bulletin giving the procedure to order an 
older version of the ROMs (5.02 or thereabouts, when my E already had 5.03 and 
I was being told that 5.04 was current), but that was it.

   As I type this, I am dialling the ZyXEL USA BBS to check whether the ROMS 
have indeed been posted... sadly, the line is busy.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
From: Jim.Long@p1.f48.n105.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Long)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: My experience w/ my new ZyXel 1496E
Date: 23 Dec 92 08:15:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: therose.725151265.AA00000

In a message of <Dec 22 22:51>, Geoffrey Welsh writes:

> 	I assume they have a ZyXel modem there, and I can test the 16.8.  

 GW>   Be prepared for disappointment: 16.8 kbps is not very robust.

That has not been my experience.  I always get 16.8k with ZyXEL's BBS, and
have never gotten less than 16.8k with any ZyXEL, local or long-distance.  I
haven't called a lot of numbers, but from Portland, OR I have called The
Dalles, OR (where my Supra wouldn't connect at all unless I locked it to
9600), Tulsa, OK, and Grapevine, TX with excellent results.

----------
: 08 Dec 00:42:35 BINK Dialing 1-918-835-6347
# 08 Dec 00:42:43 BINK Ringing
# 08 Dec 00:42:59 BINK Connect 16800/Arq/V42B
----------
: 15 Dec 07:54:39 BINK Dialing 1-817-481-8984
# 15 Dec 07:54:45 BINK Ringing
# 15 Dec 07:55:02 BINK Connect 16800/Arq/V42B
----------
: 16 Dec 23:13:18 BINK Dialing 1-296-8129
# 16 Dec 23:13:28 BINK Ringing
# 16 Dec 23:13:44 BINK Connect 16800/Arq/V42B
----------
: 22 Dec 00:21:32 BINK Dialing 1-817-481-8984
# 22 Dec 00:21:39 BINK Ringing
From: wolff@zen.et.tudelft.nl (Rogier Wolff)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: FAX pricing in Australia (Adelaide)
Keywords: Pricing, Inquiry.
Date: 27 Dec 92 15:10:08 GMT
Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering


My father will be moving to Adelaide next april. He is going to work
there for the medical faculty. He was wondering if it would be 
cheaper to buy his new FAX over there or here in Holland.

Prices here in Holland are around AU$ 600.- 

If someone in Australia, preferably Adelaide, could mail me some
recent prices (and adresses) I'd be very grateful.

					Roger.
-- 
****   a 486 in V86 mode is like a VW buggy with a 6 litre V12 motor.  ****
EMail:  wolff@duteca.et.tudelft.nl   ** Tel  +31-15-783644 or +31-15-142371
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,alt.fax
From: ware@oboe.cis.ohio-state.edu (Peter Ware)
Subject: Re: Please, Help with Netfax 2.1
Originator: ware@oboe.cis.ohio-state.edu
Organization: Ohio State Computer Science
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:36:41 GMT

Netfax is looking for Ghostscript, a freely available postscript
interpreter.  You can get via anonymous ftp from prep.ai.mit.edu in
the directory pub/gnu.  You need to get the fonts, also.

--pete
--
Pete Ware					ware@cis.ohio-state.edu
CIS Dept, Ohio State University			w/ (614) 292-7318
228 Bolz Hall, 2036 Neil Ave.			h/ (614) 538-0965
Columbus, OH 43210
Welcome William Patrick Ware to the world!  Born 10/21/92, 8lbs 6.2oz (3.83kg)
From: an4197@anon.penet.fi
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Satsfaxation/400
Date: 30 Dec 92 03:43:44 GMT
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: comp.dcom.fax

To all the good people who took the time to send info about the 400
and there were many.
Thank you very much.
ml 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
From: hqm@ai.mit.edu (Henry Minsky)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Re: I want specs for CCITT group 4 Fax
Followup-To: comp.dcom.fax
Date: 2 Jan 93 15:01:03
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
	<1993Jan1.234038.21955@netcom.com>
	<1993Jan2.162021.13885@cbnewsi.cb.att.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: transit.ai.mit.edu
In-reply-to: hrs1@cbnewsi.cb.att.com's message of Sat, 2 Jan 1993 16:20:21 GMT


   Please note that you are describing CCITT Rec. T.6 encoding.  Group 4 is a 
   protocol and terminal specification.  T.6 specifies a compression method
   called MMR, Modified Modified READ.

   Both Group 3 fax and Group 4 fax can use T.6 compression.  It is the default 
   for G4 and an option for G3.

   CCITT is now publishing their recommendations as separate publications.  
   However, it will not republish unrevised ones from the Blue Book.

   Herman Silbiger


If you want a concise tutorial on everything to do with fax protocols,
compression coding, group 4 standards, as well as a fascinating
history of the development of fax technology (The first working fax
machine was built around 1860, before the invention of the electric
motor or amplifier), get a copy this excellent book:

  
  076 MIT LIBRARIES            - GEAC LIBRARY SYSTEM -      *AUTHOR SEARCH
 AUTHOR:  McConnell, Kenneth R. 
 TITLE:   FAX : digital facsimile technology & applications / Kenneth R.
          McConnell, Dennis Bodson, Richard Schaphorst. 
 IMPRINT: Norwood, MA : Artech House, c1989. 
 PHYSICAL FEATURES: xii, 222 p. : ill. ; 24 cm. 
 SERIES:  The Artech House telecommunication library * Artech House
          telecommunications library. 
 NOTES:   Bibliography: p. 217. * Includes index. 
 OTHER AUTHORS, ETC:  Bodson, Dennis. * Schaphorst, Richard. 
 SUBJECTS: Facsimile transmission. 
 LC CARD: 89-6602 
 ISBN:    0890063109 :
From: regebro@stacken.kth.se (Lennart Regebro)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Re: CAS vs. CLASS 1
Date: 3 Jan 93 21:31:40 GMT
Organization: Stacken Computer Club, Stockholm, Sweden

In article <gksmith.20.0@mcl.cc.utexas.edu> gksmith@mcl.cc.utexas.edu (Glenn Smith) writes:
>Does anyone have a comparision between the CAS and CLASS 1 specifications?
>I need to know what the differences between the two "standards" are.  Also,
>any information concerning CLASS 2 fax modems would be appreciated.

Once again I have a fine opportunity to make a fool out of myself, but I'm
usually not that wrong, so I'll give it a try anyway.

From what I understand the Class 1 specification is very different from the
CAS. In Class 1, the application sending must tell the modem what to send, 
byte by byte. In CAS the application creates PCX files and then tells the
CAS interface to send the PCX file. The CAS interface will then do what's
necessary to send the file. This makes the use of intelligent faxmodems
possible and is vastly more preferreable. However, the CAS interface is
not very good. It's biggest drawback is the lack of decent error handling.
The only status you get is if the fax was sent or not. No hint on why the
fax wasn't sent.

I have been told that Class 2 is a step in the CAS direction, but I have no
idea how far.


-- 
------
Lennart Regebro             regebro@stacken.kth.se
Stacken Computer Club       +46-8 649 18 51
Don`t call before calculating my local time, please. This is GMT +1.