From: unregistered@newcastle.ac.uk (sundaram)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: What About Tibet?
Date: 27 Aug 92 02:26:42 GMT
Followup-To: soc.culture.china
Organization: Kampuchea Refugee Organisation

In article <1992Aug26.114859.16841@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>,
fstawit@icomp01.lerc.nasa.gov (Tawit Chitsomboon) wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Friends,
> 
> It's me again, the one who was accused as instigator of hatred.
> However, I'm fully convinced that I'm a promoter of understanding
> and compassion among fellow human beings. So I'll try one more
> time toward such direction. 
> 
> I receive a few emails with apologetic, consoling, encouraging words
> from both Chinese and non-Chinese alike.
> Thank you very much for your kinds words. Please do understand that
> I'm very much respectful of the Chinese culture and civilization
> which is of my father's and my wife's. Part of the reasons that I posted
> about Tibet was because I would like to see China being regarded
> by the world community as 'civilized', as she has always been for
> thousands of years. China deserves nothing less than that.
> 
> Surprisingly, I received no private flaming emails at all. This,
> in a way, parallels a Thai proverb that says "Scold hir at hes face but
> praise hir behind hes back". Seems very civilized to me :-)
> 
> I'm sorry that I didn't respond to many specific questions asked by
> various netters. I just don't feel that it'll lead us to any
> fruitful conclusion. 
> 
> The response from netters that moved me most was:
> "Please leave us alone, we just want happiness" (or something like that).
> I'm sure that the Tibetans use this sentence more often than
> anybody on earth. If the CCP will only listen.....
> 
> Even from the point of view of economic prosperity alone, without
> any consideration for morality, I think it'll be better for China
> to let Tibet goes. What could you derive from such a barren land
> like Tibet? It'll only suck out the Hans' development money to develop
> Tibet in order to show to the world community that "See! we came
> in and help improve their living conditions." No matter how much
> more developed Tibet will become, insofaras she is not free, the
> Western media will continue to give China negative coverages with
> exaggeration of all the news concerning Tibet. Collectively, those
> news will help paint China as barbaric. In the long run, it'll
> hurt China economic development and foreign trade, if not already.
> Like it or not, until she is free, Tibet will continue to be a big
> deep scar on China's national forehead -- very hard to conceal.
> 
> In reality, most Hans will never and can never live in the harsh, barren,
> , cold, high-altitude land of Tibet. It requires long-term human evolution
> to be able to endure such harsh living conditions. Only Tibetans
> prove to the world that they are the only human species being able to endure
> and prosper in such environment (they even suffered from low-altitude
> sickness living in the 'high-altitude' Northern India :-).
> Many Chinese immigrants are now migrating to Tibet. Even to the
> lower altitude part of it, they have suffered tremendously from
> high-altitude sicknesses. They were there because of incentives
> from CCP to swamp the population with Hans to justify their territory
> acquisition based on number of population. I suspect that they'll
> run toward the low fertile land as soon as the incentives are lifted.
> 
> Being  land-locked, and mountain-locked like it is, Where
> could Tibet goes except turning to China for help? China could then
> profitably trade with Tibet for the prosperity of both countries.
> Moreover, Tibet will be a natural buffer zone for Indo-Chinese conflicts;
> and China need not waste lots of money financing troops in the border
> areas with India either. The money could then be used to develop 
> the national economy which is much needed in most areas.
> 
> All thing considered, I think it'll be better off for China to let
> Tibet goes. Of course, a  lone, part-time hatred-instigator like me 
> can only suggest, the decision is up to the peace-loving Chinese populace.
> 
> Assuming that I am successful in brainwashing most of netters (and
> hopefully some CCP officials, too), may I suggest further that, at
> the latest, China lets Tibet go by 1997. The timing would be perfect
> for China because Hong Kong will become part of her mother land again
> by that year. All the world's eyes will be focusing onto such an
> enormous and emotional event. It'll be a grand showcase for China to
> let the entire world knows that China is now emerging as a world leader
> in all fields, including morality.
> 
> Meanwhile, the PLA deployed in Tibet could send further goodwills to
> the Tibetan people by stoping all forms of cruelty and help restore
> all the temples and other infrastructures that were destroyed during
> the occupation. The gov should stop sending Han masses to swamp Tibet
> by stopping  the incentive program. When the Dalai Lama and the Tibetans 
> in exile go back home, they will thus be rejoice and be thankful to the 
> Chinese, which means a good beginning of a new prosperous friendship of the
> two nations. 
> 
> BTW, don't forget to remove the slave's skin from the Potala Palace 
> before leaving Lhasa :-)
> 
> 
> Praise be to those who are righteous.
> -Tawit
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please don't have high self-esteem; we have enough sufferings already.


Wow! Another self-righteous moral shit-head!
After pissing down the throats of the Chinese for the past week, this self
righteous ignorant bullshitter is now threatening all those on SCC with
more yak shit. Up yours! Cunt! Why down you sell your wife to some pimp in
Phuket so that others can have a chance to put some razor blades up her
cunt. All in all, it is better off for you since you don't have another
uncouth half civilised barbaric yellow skinned Han to feed. She's just a
permanent drain on your resources. Moreover you can spare the extra free
time after the transaction to have your bum skewered with a hot rod. If
you're not satisfied, come and join us at soc.culture.asean and see what we
can do for shitheads like you.