HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bbehlen@soda.berkeley.edu (Vitamin B (Brian Behlendorf))
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: who was first with "Dumb Ads"?
Date: 15 Sep 92 21:37:22 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu


	Who was the first to have audience members send in stupid
newspaper clippings, Letterman or Carson/Leno?

	Brian

p.s. - anyone remember any good ones?


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

"This isn't one of those RAVE parties, is it?" - Nat'l Park Service
representative while I tried making "camping" reservations. ;-)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: christo@bcarh803.BNR.CA (Mark Christopher)
Subject: Re: The Harvey Pecar affair (was: Re: The Crispin Affair)
Reply-To: christo@bnr.ca
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 22:52:59 GMT

In article <1992Sep5.014109.19933@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>,
bscott@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ben Scott) writes:
|>In article <ed.715413376@cwis> ed@cwis.unomaha.edu (Ed Stastny) writes:
|>>ahawks@nyx.cs.du.edu (barbara bush on crack) writes:
|>>>Ok...I *MUST* know this...Does anyone know the whole story behind the
|>>>most famous Letterman episode of all, the Crispin Glover affair?  What
|>>>the fuck was he on, anyway?  Coke or PCP I assume, but hell if I know
|>
|>Crispin is just a rather intense guy - the actor who plays Biff (whose name
|>eludes me, but I'm sure everyone else remembers it so don't remind me) did a
|>great impression of him when the subject came up during his interview...
|>("I'm strong..." in a trembly voice...)  

Intense?  Oh that must be the "whacko" variety of intense.  If you have to
call yourself a big star, obviously that is one thing you ain't.


|>Actually, the most surprising thing about it was that Crispin was back on
|>the very next night, apologizing, and actually slightly calmer...

I think it was actually a week or two later.  Not the next night.

|>No, the bit that I liked best was Harvey Pecar's last appearance.  I was
|>really sick of Harvey, never knew why Dave kept letting him on.  The last
|>time even Dave got sick of him and they began a heated argument.  At one
|>point Dave said (while Harvey was pausing for breath) "You're a DORK,
|>Harvey..." and it was SO funny.  It's the only time I've seen Dave really
|>lose his temper (the Glover episode was Dave losing his composure, not his
|>temper...) and I don't blame him.  All the guy would ever do is come on and
|>complain about the way the staff doesn't treat him like royalty.

Harvey felt like the world owed him something.  Dave did get pretty fed
up with him, saying stuff like: "sure, you sit in your little room for your
boys and girls club, drawing little comic strips all day..."  very sarcastic
but Pecar deserved every bit of it.

-- 
Mark Christopher        Bell-Northern Research          christo@bnr.ca
Xref: sparky alt.fan.letterman:788 talk.bizarre:30122 rec.music.country.western:3320
From: dlee@aludra.usc.edu (ROGER DAVID CARASSO)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman,talk.bizarre,rec.music.country.western
Subject: Re: Viewer Mail
Followup-To: alt.fan.letterman,talk.bizarre,misc.jobs.offered,rec.music.country.western
Date: 14 Sep 1992 18:37:43 -0700
Organization: ROGER DAVID CARASSO
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

Jason John Brown <jb91+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Has anyone on the net had one of their letters used on the show?
>If so, tell us about it. I have sent a couple in, but no luck.

In 1991, I had a letter read on the air by Dave:
	"Dear Dave, 
		What's the Deal with Country and Western Music?
	 hugs, carasso"

The response was hysterical and they zoomed in on a really fat goofy
guy in the crowd wearing a cowboy hat.  

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: dmatt@iastate.edu (Daniel I Matt)
Subject: Re: WHATS (*NOT*) WRONG WITH THE SHOW
Organization: hardly any
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 07:50:16 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.020607.5458@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:
>
>>music@erich.triumf.ca (FRED W. BACH) writes:
> >How would you characterize the differences between people who liked the 
> >old Carson show and people who like the Dave Letterman show?   
>
>EASY!  Carson had mostly little old ladies from the midwest, while DAVE
>has an audience of younger, mostly college-educated LIVE people...<heh>

   Hey, what is it with this whole midwest thing?!?  Do you really think that
little old ladies don't live any where else besides in the Midwest?  It really
isn't that boring out here!  Have you ever heard of Minneapolis or Chicago or 
Kansas City?  It may not be quite as "happenin'" here as you may think 
somewhere like NYC or LA is, but it's certainly not THAT bad!  Please try to 
broaden that narrow mind of yours!

>Oh, gag and PUKE! :->   NOTHING could be worse than that awful old
>"guy lombardo" 1950s 'orchestra' and that total FOOL "doc".  Sheesh.
>PAUL Shaffer is very clearly the best and most competant "musician" 
>ever a part of a talk show.

   While I'll admit he is a very good keyboard player, his "competency" is
certainly arguable sometimes.  He has a very bad habit of including himself and
the rest of the band where they sometimes don't belong.  Why do they always
have to include themselves in with a group instead of just letting them play
by themselves?  I haven't seen any other talk/variety show where they do this
and it's very annoying!  I don't know if it's part of some sort of contractual 
agreement or what, but I wish they wouldn't do it!  I can't stand it when Paul 
has to include his little keyboard doodlings in with a heavy rock band where it
clearly doesn't belong (he completely RUINED "Trompe Le Monde" when the Pixies 
were on), or when they sing backing vocals totally off-key (like fingernails 
down a chalkboard!)!

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: cass@netcom.com (Diana Tenery-Fisher)
Subject: Re: Gifts to audience members
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 02:35:55 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa

I seem to remember one night when he was giving out encycolpedias.
(Jusrt one section... such as H-J)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: bryanh@dseg.ti.com (Bryan Hazel)
Subject: Re: General Electric, a reason to boycott
Reply-To: bryanh@dseg.ti.com
Organization: Just Me
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:44:50 GMT

In article 14479@doug.cae.wisc.edu, kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad) writes:
>In article <14SEP199200555706@vax2.concordia.ca> cwwhite@vax2.concordia.ca (Stephen White) writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>Just for the record, GE does make major components for nuclear offensive, first
>>strike nuclear weapons, including the proposed minute man missiles.  For more
>>information/documentation see the film "In the King of Prussia" starring Martin
>>Sheen in one of his many cameo appearances.  He performed for free in this
>>feature film that no one has ever heard of since it is highly revealing, and
>>could leave no viewer with any feeling other then contempt to General Electric.
>
>GE didn't decide to build missiles.  The GOVERNMENT (you, me, and everyone
>else in the U.S. -- apologies to foreign readers) decided to build missiles.
>If GE hadn't won the bid to build those missile parts, some other company would
>have... simple as that.  Yes, I suppose that you can argue GE's business
>ethnics ought to put it above weapons contracting, and that's a moral stance,
>so I can't really argue with it.  However, let me point out that if we all
>boycott whoever does weapons contracting for the government, it'll simply
>force weapons contractors (ALL of them) to raise their bids to cover losses
>due to boycotting.  And guess where that extra money comes from?  The taxpayers!
>In other words: Boycotting GE isn't going to stop the production of offensive
>weapons.  Your gripe is with your elected officials, not with GE.
>
>Have a nice day...
>
>						---Joel Kolstad
>						kolstad@cae.wisc.edu
>


HEY! HEY! As Dave might say on the net - take it to alt.politics.bite.me. We come here
to get away from this crap.
From: gmkoenig@acsu.buffalo.edu (Gerson V Koenig)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: The audience and bestiality...
Date: 12 Sep 92 18:06:33 GMT
Organization: UB

On last night's (9/11) show, the audience made a bestiality joke of their own
without any help from Dave. Billy Crystal, justifying his belief that Dave
wouldn't own a pedigreed dog said, "I've met some of your dogs, and...", and a
good portion of the audience rseponded with a "we all know what meant" sort of
a laugh. Billy Crystal's response was something to the effect of, "that's not
what I meant..."

So, it isn't just Dave's big star tiwsted sense of humor, it's just the whole
damn show that brings that sort of thing out.

Gerson Koenig
gmkoenig@acsu.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman,alt.sex.bestiality
From: vgriscep@wam.umd.edu (VGR (Craig Pell))
Subject: Re: Speaking of animals... (Re: Dave- a ninny among animals...)
Keywords: dave and aniumals...
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 01:42:34 GMT

In article <pp4yxrp@rpi.edu> schwae@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Eric A. Schwartz) writes:
>
>>I have noticed that bestiality (oops --- zoerastia :-)  ) seems to be widely
>>hinted at in Hollywood.  
>>
>>
>>"Nice legs --- for a human."   - Lt. Worf
>>
>I wonder how often its done on the holodeck.  They do make a lot of
>interspecies relationship references on ST:TNG, and it only makes 
>sense that if you are looking for intelligent life in space that you
>have acknowledged that which is still here on earth.

Star Trek IV would seem to confirm that theory.

And then there's the cat-dancer from Star Trek V (can you say, "rotten
makeup"?).
But can furry sex count as bestiality?

    VGR

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: wheelan@cc.mcgill.ca (Bill Heelan)
Subject: Re: Early Dave
Organization: McGill University, Computing Centre
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 23:52:41 GMT

In article <Bu851E.Dwq@world.std.com> bmarcum@world.std.com (Bill Marcum) writes:
>In article <dlcogswe.715434474@vela> dlcogswe@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Dan Cogswell) writes:
>>
>>Okay, let's see who the REAL Dave fans are: who used to watch the
>>Morning show?  (I did!!)  Who saw the first Late Night with Bill Murray
>>doing aerobics when it was broadcast??  (I did -- but don't remember
>>much of it :-()
[...]

  That was a looooong time ago! :-)  What was the name of the segment
  in which they showed about a minute of a movie per show.  Was it
  Nightcap Theatre?  I'm pretty sure the movie was Plan 9...

                                                     - Bill
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: bscott@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ben Scott)
Subject: Re: The Puma (was Re: the Weasel chant)
Summary: Kasparov 
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 00:36:51 GMT

>I liked the big chess game better tho (actually one of the lamest dave
>bits of all time).

You're not talking abou;t the match with Kasparov, are you?

That one was great - he interviews world-champ Garry Kasparov, then they go
over onto the stage for the opening moves of a game which will be continued
by phone for the next week or two.  Anyway, Dave is white, and moves,
standard opener, then looks at Garry.  Garry moves, again, standard opener,
and Dave _immediately_ throws his hands up and says "DAMN!  I'm SCREWED!!"
Classic Dave!  (what made it funnier was that, in truth, he was right...)

.                           <<<<Infinite K>>>>
--
|Ben Scott, professional goof-off and consultant at The Raster Image, Denver|
|Internet bscott@nyx.cs.du.edu, or call the Arvada 68K BBS at (303)424-6208.| 
|"Don't you see it?  EVIL, pure and simple,|The Raster Image IS responsible |
|from the 8th Dimension!" - Buckaroo Banzai|for everything I say! | *Amiga* |
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: WHATS WRONG WITH THE SHOW
Date: 7 Sep 92 20:29:49 GMT
Organization: Carleton University

In <7SEP199212542880@erich.triumf.ca> music@erich.triumf.ca (FRED W. BACH) writes:

>    Dear Letterman fans,

>       How would you characterize the differences between people
>       who liked the old Carson show and people who like the Dave
>       Letterman show?   Was there a large fraction that liked
>       both shows?  I don't really know.

I don't know either. My gut feeling is that Johnny attracted the older
set, Arsenio the younger set, and Letterman the in-betweens and
mentally disturbed.<grin>

>       I was a Carson fan.  I liked Jay as a guest host, but I
>       often found better guests on Dave's show.  Generally I find
>       the humor a problem on the Letterman show, however.  I think it
>       is often too silly and aimed at a much more childish mind.

Well, yes...but I thought that was the whole point. I mean, not
everyone can be Johnny, or Leno (thank goodness). While Letterman's
stuff appears childish, it isn't necessarily simplistic. My brother
does stand-up work that is and can be quite intelligent, and he loves
Letterman. I have two masters degrees, but I find Letterman great. A
childish mind isn't necessarily a bad thing.... 

And obviously Letterman has found a niche. His show is successful, its
good, clean, albeit bizarre, fun. If that's such a problem, don't
watch it.

>       I liked the music way better on Carson with Doc.  Dave's flying

That's a matter of personal taste. I'm not sure how many people watch
a talk show specifically for the music. I don't think that should be
held against Dave. I don't like Paul Schaffer at all, but I still
watch the show (from time to time...like the odd Friday)

>       I guess that's my chief complaint-- much of Dave's humor
>       seems to me to be like what a small child would do, or like
>       what a drunk with a camera would do at some wild party.

Disagree. Drunks are never as funny, and little kids are just
obnoxious. Dave is a bit of both!<g>. David Letterman is quite
intelligent, and his stuff is quite intelligent as well. Trust me, it
takes a brain to make people laugh, and laugh consistently every night
for over 10 years.

>       But the guests and most of his top-10 lists are very goo

Yes.
d.
>       There is usually some thought that shows through in the top-10
>       lists, although a I see a lot of goofiness, too.

Sure...but what is wrong with that? Its a goofy show. Now relax, and
enjoy a beverage!


Michael
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: dmatt@iastate.edu (Daniel I Matt)
Subject: Re: Dave's Faves (guests)
Organization: hardly any
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 03:05:50 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.012033.24554@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> ahawks@nyx.cs.du.edu (scooby dooby doo) writes:
>In article <1992Sep7.004526.21683@cs.wisc.edu> gopher@yar.cs.wisc.edu (Chris Bovitz) writes:
>|So, who do you think are Mr. Letterman's favorite guests?  Y'know, someone
>|he seems to get along with well, someone he speaks highly of (not Cher)
>|when they're not on or they will be on soon.  Here's a start:
>|
>|Teri Garr
>|Tom Brokaw
>
>Phil Donahue
>Charles Grodin (in a sarcastic sort of way)
>Richard Lewis
>David Sanborn (if he counts)

   Don't forget Connie Chung!
From: wdavid@unf6.unf.edu (Bill David)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Dennis Miller on the Emmys
Date: 10 Sep 92 00:18:49 GMT
Organization: University of North Florida, Jacksonville

In article <1992Sep2.035947.27735@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> ahawks@nyx.cs.du.edu (barbara bush on crack) writes:
>
>Anyway, Dennis Miller was cancelled because he has a brain, he appeals
>to an intelligent audience - people that think while waching tv, not
>just eat twinkies.  Miller himself enjoys the fact the he and a guy
>in Wisconson somewhere are the only two that get his deepest
>sub-reference (which isn't true, but....)...And I'd also like to know

Miller was at his best when his monologue mirrored his stand-up;
observations compared in some bizarre recursive algorithm to 
everyone who ever lived. 

He screwed up because he wasn't a good interviewer (he got better
as the show progressed) and he had a habit of sermonizing about
his own political views.

He wins the award for the most interesting mix of guests. Henry
Rollins and a physicist on the same show? He gets brownie points
for that. 

But then he didn't have Larry Bud handing out hot towels, either.

>I guess Allan Havey is worthless, too....(insert your favorite
>worthless suburban 3-letter-catch-phrase here)

Havey has the best of the 11:30-flight talk shows.

-Bill
wdavid@unf6.cis.unf.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: ghatch@NeoSoft.com (Greg Hatch)
Subject: Sound files
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 05:28:18 GMT

Someone posted about sound files on sonata.cc.purdue.edu available by FTP.
I downloaded them and uncompressed them, but I do not know how to un-TAR them.
can someone please help me with un-TAR the sound files?

Thanks.


-- 
Greg Hatch (ghatch@neosoft.com)
.
"Cleans you, thrills you, may even keep you from getting busted."
	_Remington Electric Razor advertisement_  by Frank Zappa
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams)
Subject: Re: WHATS (*NOT*) WRONG WITH THE SHOW
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 13:41:50 GMT

dmatt@iastate.edu (Daniel I Matt) writes:
 >dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:
 >>Carson had mostly little old ladies from the midwest, while DAVE
 >>has an audience of younger, mostly college-educated LIVE people...<heh>

 >Hey, what is it with this whole midwest thing?!?  

I dunno...  I didn't start it! :->   Probably it is due to johnny
coming from Nebraska or wherever the hell it is...

 >Do you really think that little old ladies don't live any where else 
 >besides in the Midwest?  
Hmmm... you're right!  I bet there are quite a few down in Florida as well!

 >It really isn't that boring out here!  Have you ever heard of Minneapolis 
 >or Chicago or Kansas City?  
I *think* so, but i'd have to check.

 >It may not be quite as "happenin'" here as you may think somewhere 
 >like NYC or LA is, but it's certainly not THAT bad!  
Well, there is certainly a lot "happenin" in LA, but I don't like much of it.

 >>PAUL Shaffer is very clearly the best and most competant "musician" 
 >>ever a part of a talk show.

 >While I'll admit he is a very good keyboard player, his "competency" is
 >certainly arguable sometimes.  
I dunno, he seems pretty good to me.  His COMEDY talent and ability 
to interact with Dave is what's really important though.

 >He has a very bad habit of including himself and the rest of the band 
 >where they sometimes don't belong.  Why do they always have to include 
 >themselves in with a group instead of just letting them play by themselves?

Why not?  You can hear them "by themselves" ANYWHERE.  Besides, I am only
interested in a TINY percentage of the musical guests anyway.  For the very
few that I did want to see, I *ENJOYED* having Paul and the guys add something
special to the song i'd already heard over and over before.

 >I haven't seen any other talk/variety show where they do this
 >and it's very annoying!  
I disagree.  Being DIFFERENT is what makes Dave's show so much better.

 >he completely RUINED "Trompe Le Monde" when the Pixies were on
Heh... I wouldn't know.

Xref: sparky alt.fan.letterman:802 talk.bizarre:30179 misc.jobs.offered:11108 rec.music.country.western:3321
From: ph111-bx@violet.berkeley.edu (;;;;7202)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman,talk.bizarre,misc.jobs.offered,rec.music.country.western
Subject: Re: Viewer Mail
Date: 15 Sep 1992 05:59:01 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.berkeley.edu

A pithy and memorable letter:

"Dear Dave:

You and your lame show suck.

P.S.  Send money."
From: mouser@cs.umd.edu (David Eccleston)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Gifts to audience members
Date: 11 Sep 92 00:39:55 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742

>> What are the different types of gifts that Dave has given to audience
>> members in the past?  I have a few listed here:
>> 
>>         Fajitas
>>         Composters
>>         Edible plunger
>>         Gallon jars of mayonnaise
>> 
>> What else?

Last week he had audience members playing 'Brush With Greatness' where they
described times they ran into celebrities.  As prizes for playing he gave
them large squares of sod.

Anyone remember that feature they had where each night they would drop a new
set of objects on Dave's head?  One night they did styrofoam packing curls,
one night was plastic slinkies, one night they did softballs... I can't
remember what the feature was called though, anyone remember?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: goudreau@batman.rtp.dg.com (Bob Goudreau)
Subject: Re: Dave's Behavior With Interesting Guests
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 16:22:52 GMT
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC

In article <hatton.715479614@cgl.ucsf.edu> hatton@socrates.ucsf.edu (Tom Hatton) writes:
>
> It'd also be nice if he could call it the damn ONTARIO SCIENCE
> CENTRE and not the Hall of Science or whatever the hell mangled name he
> came up with.

But that's part of the fun -- he takes a tongue-in-cheek attitude to
it, and is always trying to find amusingly incorrect names for it.
Sort of like his constant misnaming of Hal Gurnee and Anton Figg, or
his references a few years back to such movies as "Steel Petunias"
or "Honey, I Ate the Kids!".

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Goudreau			Data General Corporation
goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com		62 Alexander Drive	
+1 919 248 6231			Research Triangle Park, NC  27709, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: hersh@expo.lcs.mit.edu (Jay Hersh)
Subject: Re: Feeling sorry for Dave..
Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:58:09 GMT

mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes:

>In <hersh.716152061@xenon.lcs.mit.edu> hersh@expo.lcs.mit.edu (Jay Hersh) writes:

>>>Actually, in this case I think he was being more sincere.  Concrete Blonde
>>>has been on Late Night a couple of times and Letterman seemed to really
>>>take a fancy to them.

>>Hey is Dave married?? I noticed it seems he really had the hots for the
>>chick in Concrete Blond. Then again he has also seemed to have the hots for
>>a number of sexy model types on the show (both known and unknown) and
>>has appeared to come on to some of them. So is this an act, or is Dave
>>hard up??

>When Dennis and Dave were talking about this, I'm sure Dave said
>something like "I used to be engaged to her," <her> meaning the lead
>singer from Concrete Blond.


He's said that about her a few times since they were first on the show.
I am pretty sure this was a joke....

	JaH
--
Hopfen und Malz, Gott erhalts
From: cholette@JSP.UMontreal.CA (Cholette Martin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Fav episode!
Date: 9 Sep 92 04:27:50 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

In article <1992Sep4.200107.1188@riscsm.scripps.edu> doug@scripps.edu (Doug Cababa) writes:
>In article <GHENNIGA.92Sep4105724@ampere.ampere> ghenniga@NMSU.Edu writes:
>>
>>My favorite episode is the one which started (I think) the now famous...
>>	
>>		"Hep me, hep me! I been hypmoootized!"
>>
>>That was the one where the guy who's hypnotic powers were so "great" that 
>>he had to wear sun glasses to avoid inadvertently hypnotizing people! Yea
>>right!
>>	The guy picked someone from the audience who, despite her best tries
>>at faking it, obviously was not hypnotized and had to bite her lip to keep
>>from laughing! Dave pretty much tore the guy apart. What was the guys name?
>>I think I heard he sued the show after that but as far as I know it was just
>>a rumor.
>>
>>Gary
>>(ghenniga@NMSU.Edu)


 Some of my favorite shows are the ones with the WORLD's SUPER HERO
 STUNTMAN, ENTERTAINER OF THE CENTURY, SUPER DAVE OSBORNE!

 I recall one in particular where he tells the story about Farmer Bob
 and his pet duck, what a riot!

 Martin Cholette
 cholette@jsp.umontreal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman