HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson)
Subject: Re: 1st Class or 3rd Class ???
Organization: Dept. of Scientific Computing, Uppsala Univ.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:38:14 GMT

vsg001@acad.drake.edu wrote:
: In article <jorngh.185.724281052@dhhalden.no>, jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes:
: > 
: > What'd you choose if you had to :
: > 
: > Cretin 1st class or Cretin 3rd class ?
: > 
: > I'd choose 3rd class, don't know about you but your IQ sucks rocks ...
: 
: Oh. Absolutly a beautifully constructed arguement JORN. How on Earth did you
: come up with such a retort... "your IQ sucks rocksss" I love how you ended that
: NOT with a period, but with three... leaving a sense of mystery in the readers
: mind... I LOVE how you have managed to admit that in fact you ARE a cretin and
: are deciding at what LEVEL you are a cretin. Try looking up the word JORN.
: 
: --The Phantom 

Very impressive not-understanding-anything-at-all show-off, Phantom.
Perhaps you should avoid any further encounters with people intellectually
superior to messrs Dall'Agata and Walsh. Then again, this leaves you
alone with J S Graley. Stick to him, and stay out of the other discussions
with your deplorable postings!

/Par
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: a weekend without a bunny
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 16:22:21 GMT

mel@maddog.ece.nd.edu writes:
->keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
->>mel@maddog.ece.nd.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
->>->keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr):
->>->>what the fuck are you talking about? some idiot was
->>->>posting forgeries from your account. i sent the
->>->>forgeries to your postmaster. you should have said
->>->>thanks.
->>
->>->Amazingly enough, I didn't even know if someone squawked
->>->much less who.  
->>
->>are you admitting that you're the twit who posted the
->>forged articles, mel? as for squawking, i didn't, nor
->>did i mention you. it never occured to me that you were
->>the one posting the forgeries. i must have misjudged
->>you mel. even kebbie doesn't do forgeries.
->>
->Hmmm.  They were posted from my account, they had my name in the
->From: line, and it never occurred to you that I posted them.

no it didn't, mel. there's nothing lower than the
net.scum who post forgeries. as i said, i must have
misjudged you.
From: dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Charts and THE GREAT IDIOT
Date: 12 Dec 92 02:48:55 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <1gbgnjINN779@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
>
> According to the JefTittyLameFlameOMeter(tm):
>               0   1/4
>               :.|.:
>                 |
> 
> You have scored 1/8 (that's ONE EIGHTH) out of 10 for your posting.
> 
> You may notice the meter scale only goes up to 1/4.
> 
> I'll leave it as a homework problem for you to figure out why.
> 
Now the great IDIOT learned how to do a chart with the terminal. The Great 
MORON is proud of himself. The great ASSHOLE think to be fun. Well, "man", 
you are just a british. I explained all about you. (I know, you do not 
understand. But that's not a big deal, you NEVER understand!)

	Michele
From: dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: To flame or not to flame. That's the clue.
Date: 19 Dec 92 13:51:47 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

SHIT! Everybody is gone. For the week-end? For Christmas (ARRRGGGH!), for 
the life? Let's see. I hope that I will not be the only one to post here...

Anyway, To Flame or NOT to Flame? That's the clue. I mean, I was so *happy* 
the first time that I saw this folder, I thought "Yeaahhh! Finally people 
that like to *flame*! We are not so many around the world, and everybody is 
HERE!". Bullshit, just bullshit. It is just a bunch of chickens, that try 
to have fun pissing of the other people. I am an *ANGRY MAN*, maybe the 
angriest! I STARTED TO *FLAME* WHEN I WAS 3 YEARS OLD!!! MY MOTHER WAS 
BECOMING CRAZY DEALING WITH ME!!! I SAID FUCK OFF TO THE COPS, TO THE 
PROFESSORS, TO THE ITALIAN ARMY! ARRRGGHHH! (trying to get laid...) 
What the hell are you doing alt.flame people?!?!? What do you mean with 
"to flame"?!?!? I proposed a BIG INTERNATIONAL ORGY, and only two guys 
answered. I CAN'T BELIVE THAT!!!! Yeah, Tep was right. You need a challenge,
everything is getting boring here. I am your CHALLENGE! Flame with me, if 
you can! But this time I will be not good boy, I will be the devil. So, take 
care. 

	Michele

===========================================================================
I wish to everybody a real BAD Christmas. I hope that your fathers will die 
doing the role of Santa Claus that come down from the chimney. I wish that 
your planes blow out while you are going back home to meet your families.
Have a Christmas Drink and Drive accident, get as many DUI as you can. 
And, Last but not Least, FUCK YOURSELF, again.
===========================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.tasteless.jokes
From: mjw@cch.coventry.ac.uk (Alien)
Subject: Re: Joke for you 10 percenters
Organization: Coventry University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:04:27 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.213324.22962@infonode.ingr.com> tensmekl@infonode.ingr.com (Kermit Tensmeyer) writes:
>In article <BzAIDt.A3E@willamette.edu> dreese@willamette.edu (Daniel L. Reese) writes:
>>>It took the British three weeks to deploy troops into the Falklands. 
>>>The U.S. had troops in staging in Saudi Arabia within 48 hours of the
>>>invasion of Kuwait.  By the time you limeys get your sorry assed army in
>>>motion, America has already done the job and gotten the glory.
>>>
>>That's because the US gov't made protection treaties with the Saudis as
>>really as 1945.  The reason the U.S troops were in Saudi Arabia in 48 hrs
>>was because they had bases waiting for them.
>
>Prior to WWII the Middle East was Owned by the Brits, because of incomptent
>management, the brits are no longer welcome in the Area. Remember the border
>between Iraq, Iran, and Kuwait was determinded by British idiots, not
>just American idiots.  The Saudis had been trained by the Brits, who decided
>based on their expieriece with British Bussiness managment and British
>miltary expertise, that even French Frogs would be better than Limey Adminstrators.
>
>
>
>
>-- 
>         Kermit Tensmeyer                         | Intergraph Corporation
>   klt@kt8127.b23a.ingr.com                       | Deep in Dixie


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN)
Subject: Re: The Mutha Fuckin Saga continues...
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 21:31:41 GMT

Jeff the witless writes ...
>Your men are wastes, they cheat on thier wives with women that look
>like they were used by a group of large apes-all fucked up! 
>Women in your country are straight, black haired dogs with attitudes
>a.k.a bitches. Nothing beats the nice fine AMERICAN women!

Nobody *beats* the american woman except their husbands,
the most violent and alcoholized creature upon our earth.

Have you ever been outside your wasted nation 'soldier' ?
Your women are the same that gets fat and repulsive the
minute you're married. The fat ones that goes to the mall
twice a day to buy more ice cream not understanding why
they are so fucking fat. The ones that doesn't understand
why their men are cheating on them.

French women are beatiful compared to your mountains of fat.

>JEFF WITTY
>A.K.A. THE SOLDIER OF FORTUNE, U.S. ARMY 

I laugh at you, 'soldier'. You're nothing but a wanna-be,
a character who use USA's military power as a macho symbol.

_________________________________________________________________________
| Jorn Halonen              | "dinga ding dang my danga long ling long" |
| jorngh@sofus.dhhalden.no  |                               - Ministry  |

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n Doesn't Require New Tactics
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:48:08 GMT

In article <1gi8bqINNav6@conquest.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@conquest.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <Bz3Kqq.Jzq@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>>>K e n doesn't require new tactics, for the present ones are working
>>>>within expected parameters.
>>>>
>>>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>>>
>>>You mean to tell us suicide by boredom is your tactic.  If that's the case,
>>>keep up the good work.  And I also found your posts in alt.humor to be 
>>>useless, they want jokes in there, not a joke like you.
>>
>>You seem to be quite misinformed, for K e n has never made an appearance in
>>alt.humor, nor has K e n attempted to post in alt.humor, for alt.humor
>
>I have found articles from you posted in Alt.Humor.  This Illogical use of
>deciet (sp?) is tedious.  I suggest you try another tactic.  This one has
>failed.

Incorrect. K e n does not subscribe to alt.humor, for it does not
exist in K e n's realm. Perhaps you have alt.humor confused with
rec.humor?

>>is non-existant in K e n's realm.
>
>Please Define "KEN'S REALM" as explicitly as possible.

That which is within K e n's reach, mentally, spiritually, and
physically.

>>If you wish to commit suicide, then that is your prerogative,
>>but K e n highly advises against it.
>>
>Ken's advice is meaningless, for Ken is a lunatic.
>I would like to see a picture of you to know what I'm dealing 
>with when I talk to you.

K e n is not a lunatic, for K e n is K e n, and K e n cannot be
anything else but K e n. Pictures are not available for public
consumption.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk (Pete Biggs)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: in American defense...
Date: 18 Dec 92 17:16:26 GMT
Organization: Physical Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ
Originator: pete@joule.pcl


In article <exuptr.458.0@exu.ericsson.se>, exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor) writes:
> In article <1992Dec16.193356.1270@physchem.ox.ac.uk> pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk (Pete Biggs) writes:
> 
> >Is it possible to have "good population sample" of Americans?
> >They are all a bunch of wierdos.  
> 
> Oh, right, like a limey has any room to talk about wierdos.

I don't see any wierdos over here mate - well, perhaps a couple, but you've
got a whole goddam country of them.


> 
> >Educated Americans - not a hope.
> 
> Don't even get me started on that.

Oh go on ...  It'll be good to see you expose your ignorance to the rest
of the world.

> 
> 
>  ----------------------!!! H A P P Y   H O L I D A Y S !!!-------------------

                                                              Cheers


> 
>   - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
>     exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
                                                               ^^^^
                                                    Nearly, but not quite :-)


Pete

-- 
=============================================================================
Pete Biggs :{)                         Janet: pete@uk.ac.ox.physchem
                                    Internet: pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk
=============================================================================
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Gun toting american fools
Date: 14 Dec 92 15:21:09 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <1992Dec13.144234.1@fnala.fnal.gov> dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata) writes:
> 
> My liver is already gone due to the morons like you that are in this world.
> You know, I've grown up catholic, they taught to me to be good with the 
> morons, but man, that's hard!
>
You can't be that good with morons, you left Italy and went to live
elsewhere.  Is running away what you call being good.  They can't pay
you much for sweeping up if you have to resort to eating your own
liver!  I suppose you got the brown sauce from work.

>
> Expecially when they do not understand any fuck!
> 
You are the fuck no one understands.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: "Black Power" (was Re: Perot In '96 (Was Re: Test the flame))
Date: 14 Dec 1992 23:49:14 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <1992Dec13.161454.1@fnala.fnal.gov> dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov 
(Michele Dall'Agata) writes:
>I would like that it ends, now. But I do not belive that. More time pass, 
>and bigger are the differences. Rich people become richer, and poor people 
>becomes poorer. And anyway, it did not happened long ago. Your cities 
>started to burn because the court made a *mistake*. It was a racist mistake.
>And it happened only few months ago. 

I disagree that it was a mistake.  Yes, the officers used excessive
force.  But you weren't a member of the jury.  What right is it of you
to decide from one video tape that those officers were guilty?  You
didn't see the evidence that the jury did, and you more than likely
did NOT see that entire video tape until after the verdict was made.
The media chose to show the part of the tape where Mr. King got the
living piss kicked out of him.  Anybody watching that is going to be
sympathetic, unless they are a totally unfeeling bastard.  But that 
wasn't all the evidence.  And we all know that if Mr. King had been
white, nobody would have cared that he got beat up.

(this is for Pamela daHling, cause she's so convinced I am a racist.  Have
some more bait, dear, and flame away....)

						--Liz

--
bite me, fan boy
From: dvp@oasis.icl.co.uk (Geezer)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A racist rears her ugly little head
Date: 18 Dec 92 17:51:29 GMT
Organization: The Mountains of Madness
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
> 
> In article <BzA968.6zI@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) 
> deems worthy to post her opinion:
> >You're aren't correct, nothing you have said is true and as far as
> >defending a weak position, hon, you have yet to offer anything in
> >your behalf that might possibly be called a defense.
> 
> Yes, I am correct, I have stated the truth to the best of my
> knowledge, and my position has been defended just fine.  Besides, why
> should I have to defend my ideas to you?  Will I fail out of school if
> I don't?  No.  Will it do any modicum of good in terms of changing
> your inane ideas?  No.  So, I've stated my piece.  You've stated
> yours.  I've replied to you, and you've replied to me.  If you like,
> we can beat it to death...  I'd rather not.  I have better things to
> do then talk to a brick wall, daHling...
> 
Careful Liz, don't upset the PC'rs - you'll never know when they'll
come knocking on YOUR door!

> Come speak to me when you have opened your mind a bit.  Maybe we can
> have an intelligent conversation, instead of being misinformed about
> one another's ideas and throwing around wicked names like 'bigot' and
> 'racist'.
> 
I don't consider myself either a bigot or a racist and I'm sure you
don't either, but that doesn't matter. Unless you subscribe to their
narrow-minded bullshit then you're the ENEMY.

Here in the UK we've seen what's been happening over in the States -
the racists and the bigots have got themselves together and dreamed up
the concept of PC - did they try to tell you that only white,
anglo-saxon males could be racists and bigots? Well we can see over
here that that is bullshit. I thought that equality, both sexual and
racial, was all about ignoring differences and relating to people as
you find them, not because of what colour they are or if they've got
more lumps than you. I guess I was wrong.

I guess that it's not enough that I treat people as best I can, I
guess that I've got to feel guilt at what my ancestors did, I've got
to atone for their sins, I've got to prostrate myself before this
great goddess PC and ask for forgiveness. Well they can kiss my ass.
They can take they're warped philosophy and stuff it where the monkey
stuffs his nuts!

Please note, this is not an anti American, Italian, Norwegian, Swedish
or British flame - those were getting boring, just an anti-nutters
flame.

Dave 
> 					--Liz
> 
> --
> deal with it, pink boy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
------              Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year          -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: Re: Archives for Adrienne
Followup-To: news.net-cops.kevin-darcy
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 20:44:33 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.155932.2036@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>Yeah, kind of like when you went around asking Oleg to prove that
>>he didn't forge a sendsys from dac.
>Never done that. I do recall, however, at one point asking Oleg to disprove 
>that DAC had good cause to _believe_ that he had been sendsys'ed by Oleg. 

Exactly.

>>Oh come on, Kevie, it was only one sentence -- that hardly counts
>>as a "bucketful."  
>No, but _hundreds_ of hateful articles does.

I only wrote one article about you that Adrienne Regard would have
seen. dear.  One article containing that one sentence.  But she 
didn't need to read my comments to come to that conclusion herself,
it's obvious what what you post that you don't have any social life.

>>And besides, it's true.  You don't have any so-
>>cial life, the closest you ever come to interacting with women is
>>when you fight with us on the net.
>And how many men have _you_ dated in the last month, eh? :-)

Just my husband.  Why do you ask?  Does this have some relevancy to
the fact that you don't have any social life?

>Well, he denied your perverted, distorted account of my family history, which

No, he didn't, Kevin.

---------------
"I am sure you can, dear, your skill and talent for wielding rhetori-
 cal devices large and small is unmatched by anyone in the universe."
					Trish O Tuama
					<1990Oct21.160234.10462@world.std.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: British Empire Loyalists
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 02:12:35 GMT

king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King) writes:

>In article <1992Dec10.150352.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>>One thing that the aliens of the Net try to claim is that they too put up a vst
>>amount of effort in the worlds problems today. 

>We have 10% the population of the USA, so if we send 11% as many troops
>anywhere, then we are making a larger contribution (on a per capita basis)
>than the US. I'm not saying that we are doing this in Somalia, just that
>you should put things into the proper perspective before opening your
>great festering gob, vsg001. 

I would like to add to this that it was a Canadian who came up with the
idea of using troops for peace keeping.  His name was Lester Pearson.  He
was a prime minister of Canada and the secretary general of the UN.  He
won the nobel peace prize for it.  Since then Canada has always been 
amoung the nations that send out the most peace keeping forces in the 
world per capita.  Not only to Somalia, but on what seems like a list
of hundreds of other missions.  
> 
>>This is as trivial as the existence of the French. 

>Really? Your ignorance astounds me! (again and again and again)
>You wouldn't happen to be Turd KKKaldis, now would you?

Yes, I must say, I too, am suprised to hear this coming from an
American.  Do you think that the US would even be a nation today
without having recieved French assistance.  I would think you
Americans with your we-are-all-imporatant attitude would think
important in history those factors which led to your existance.


Katherine Merle Mason
Ne Oublie....
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: Re: A racist rears her ugly little head
Followup-To: alt.flame.liz
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 06:28:58 GMT

From: liz@wpi.WPI.EDU (Liz Stewart)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 17:53:30 -0500
Message-Id: <9212162253.AA03182@bigwpi.WPI.EDU>

>>No doubt, but that's exactly where the problem lies -- you don't
>>know what you are talking about.  The "best of your knowledge" 
>>is both parochial and pathetic.  All you do is recite the same
>>old bigotry that you've heard someone else spout.  You might at
>>least be interesting if you could offer some original thought
>>on this subject but so far all you've done is run around like a
>>chicken with it's head cut off screaming, "PC! PC!"
>*I* recite the same old bigotry? 

Yes -- the nonsense you've been babbling here is nearly 30 yrs old.

>majority tells me to think.  If that makes me a bigot and a racist,
>then so be it.

No, what makes you a bigot is the fact that you believe in and up-
hold racist thinking.  That you are either not intelligent enough
or old enough to figure out for yourself why the beliefs you cur-
rently hold are racist tripe.

>  But I've noticed that you haven't answered the charges
>of those who have similar ideas such as me. 

The only other articles I have seen from anybody with similar ideas
"such as you" (sic) on this subject have been from Patrick Humphrey
and I didn't bother to respond to his "charges" because nothing he 
wrote had any relevance to what I wrote.  Speaking of Patrick Hum-
phrey, however, do you understand his "fellow-travelers" reference?

>	 Perhaps it is not my
>ideas that you object to, but me personally? 

Nah, you're just the latest in a long line of a.f toys, Liz.  It's
too bad you're going away, though, that startled-deer-caught-in-the
-headlights look that appeared on your face when I started respond-
ing to you was most amusing.

>And I am most definitely *not* PC...political correctness is rather
>silly, in my eyes.

PC's in the eye of the beholder, hon.  And you certainly do seem to
see it everywhere you look.

---------------
The only conclusion I can reach is that you are a poster child for the
perspective-impaired.  You might start your search for your perspective on
milk cartons.  Even though you are giving your whole life to alt.flame, you'll
have a hard time keeping up with us part-timers. :-)

You are pathetic beyond belief, Kevin, as in "having the capacity to move one
to either compassionate or contemptuous pity."

About six months with finger paints would work wonders.
					-- Chris A Lyman
					<1992Feb4.181031.10689@pwcs.stpaul.gov>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.tasteless.jokes