HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: RE: Get the comfy chair !
Date: 12 Oct 92 13:37:48 CDT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY


In article <9OCT92.16395252@vax.clarku.edu>, jsarna@vax.clarku.edu writes:
> In a previous article, goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet leaps tall buildings in a single
> bound (depending, of course, on where she's bound):
>> 
> 
> Gibbon's _Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire_ DELETED
>>>>> Pardon me, but it's my God-given right to bash rats if I want to!  
>>>>> BTW, according to my records, your policy states that no claim you ever
>>>>> make will be paid.
>>>>> 				piece,
>>>>> 				Fievel
>>>> 
>>>>Excuse me, Fievel, but I want to be the one to bash rats. I hear they
>>>>are actually very good in the late night hours...
>>>> 
>>>>So you found out that my claims might not be paid...That doesn't mean
>>>>I won't get paid, now does it.
>>>> 
>>>>Piece?!??  What, are you lonely? 
>>>>	What've you got to say NOW????>>>>>>>>>>>Gina 
>>> 
>>> Will you marry me?
>>> 		-Fievel
>> 
>>Mawiage. We have come together to join these two in wholy matwimoney. 
>>Sure, I'll marry you IF:
>>	1. You'll pay all my cliams that I might not pay. 
>>	2. I won't have to pay you for anything (though the rewards
>>	   for your sevices rendered will be abundant and pleasing).
>>	3. Rat-bashing and cat-crashing become Olympic Sports.
>>	4. You're as good everywhere else as you are on the computer.
>>		(And I do mean ***everywhere***  *wink, wink*)
> 
> I'm sorry, my dear, but my religion forbids me from giving money to cliams.
> 			-Fievel
So our engagement is off? I didn't even get a ring. How could you? And
after all I did for--and to--you?
From: jsarna@vax.clarku.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: RE: Get the comfy chair !
Date: 7 Oct 92 16:26:08 GMT
Organization: Clark University

In a previous article, mfc1493@tamuts.tamu.edu (Michael Frank Caver) wrote:
>Fievel went west saying:
>>In a previous article, goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet shaves the following into
>>Ratboy's flea-infested fur:
>>>In article <6OCT92.00455306@vax.clarku.edu>, jsarna@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>>>> In a forthcoming article, goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet summarizes Proust:
>>>>>In article <3OCT92.21402079@vax.clarku.edu>, jsarna@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>>>>>> In a previous article, jwlr@escher.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) 
>>>>>> foams at the mouth and falls over backwards:
>>>>>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>>>>>>* The views expressed in this article do not reflect the views of any  *
>>>>>>>>>* organisation or person except my own.                                *
>>>>>>>>>*                                                                      *
>>>>>>>>>* "Did I ask too much, more than a lot?,                               *
>>>>>>>>>* You gave me nothing, now that's all that I've got"  U2               *
>>>>>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>Hmmm. The U2 quote seems rather relevent to this posting, I believe.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>Ratboy aka has nothing to say.
>>>>>>>James <=== same here
>>>>>> Well, if you held these views up to a mirror, they'd certainly reflect then,
>>>>>> wouldn't they?  HA!!  You never thought of that, did you?  Well, You'd better
>>>>>> think more carefully the next time you write one of those poxy disclaimers, 
>>>>>> eh?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 					peace,
>>>>>> 					Fievel
>>>>>WEll now. Rat-bashing are we? What if I claimed to be ineligible to
>>>>>claim the disclaimer that was claimed before I started to claim
>>>>>disclaimers? What if I made sense every once in a while....
>>>>>		Love and all that for those who need it....
>>>>>			Gina
>>>>>> 
>>>> Pardon me, but it's my God-given right to bash rats if I want to!  
>>>> BTW, according to my records, your policy states that no claim you ever
>>>> make will be paid.
>>>> 				piece,
>>>> 				Fievel
> 
>Hey! Any American knows that Fievel was a mouse! You...you...genocidist!
> 
>>>Excuse me, Fievel, but I wan tto be the one to bash rats. I hear they
>>>are actually very good in the late night hours...
> 
>Now that's more like it...
> 
>>>So you found out that my claims might not be paid...That doesn't mean
>>>I won't get paid, now does it.
>>> 
>>>Piece?!??  What, are you lonely? 
>>>	What've you got to say NOW????>>>>>>>>>>>Gina 
>>
>>Will you marry me?
>>		-Fievel
>Yes.
> 
>Ratboy aka Right! Where's your akas? I'm afraid I'll have to take you in unless
>  you show me your liscence.
---------------------
* STATE OF NEW YORK *
*  LICENCE TO AKA   *
* Hereby granted to *
*      Fievel       *
*  expires 7/26/95  *
--------------------- 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
From: mfc1493@tamuts.tamu.edu (Michael Frank Caver)
Subject: Re: Get the comfy chair !
Organization: ~/lib/organization
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 06:34:25 GMT

Fievel went west saying:
>In a previous article, goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet shaves the following into
>Ratboy's flea-infested fur:
>>In article <6OCT92.00455306@vax.clarku.edu>, jsarna@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>>> In a forthcoming article, goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet summarizes Proust:
>>>>In article <3OCT92.21402079@vax.clarku.edu>, jsarna@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>>>>> In a previous article, jwlr@escher.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) 
>>>>> foams at the mouth and falls over backwards:
>>>>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>>>>>* The views expressed in this article do not reflect the views of any  *
>>>>>>>>* organisation or person except my own.                                *
>>>>>>>>*                                                                      *
>>>>>>>>* "Did I ask too much, more than a lot?,                               *
>>>>>>>>* You gave me nothing, now that's all that I've got"  U2               *
>>>>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>Hmmm. The U2 quote seems rather relevent to this posting, I believe.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>Ratboy aka has nothing to say.
>>>>>>James <=== same here
>>>>> Well, if you held these views up to a mirror, they'd certainly reflect then,
>>>>> wouldn't they?  HA!!  You never thought of that, did you?  Well, You'd better
>>>>> think more carefully the next time you write one of those poxy disclaimers, 
>>>>> eh?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 					peace,
>>>>> 					Fievel
>>>>WEll now. Rat-bashing are we? What if I claimed to be ineligible to
>>>>claim the disclaimer that was claimed before I started to claim
>>>>disclaimers? What if I made sense every once in a while....
>>>>		Love and all that for those who need it....
>>>>			Gina
>>>>> 
>>> Pardon me, but it's my God-given right to bash rats if I want to!  
>>> BTW, according to my records, your policy states that no claim you ever
>>> make will be paid.
>>> 				piece,
>>> 				Fievel

Hey! Any American knows that Fievel was a mouse! You...you...genocidist!

>>Excuse me, Fievel, but I wan tto be the one to bash rats. I hear they
>>are actually very good in the late night hours...

Now that's more like it...

>>So you found out that my claims might not be paid...That doesn't mean
>>I won't get paid, now does it.
>> 
>>Piece?!??  What, are you lonely? 
>>	What've you got to say NOW????>>>>>>>>>>>Gina 
>
>Will you marry me?
>		-Fievel
Yes.

Ratboy aka Right! Where's your akas? I'm afraid I'll have to take you in unless
  you show me your liscence.
From: jwlr@okeeffe.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: On the world-wide distribution of Cheese
Date: 16 Oct 92 03:40:12 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

>>>Speaking of rat----Where's my favorite Ratboy these days? 
>> 
>> 	Ratboy aka In your pocket, my sweet.

>Why are you in my pocket? Shouldn't you be somewhere more accessible,
>since these pants are so darn tight?

I'm sorry, I'll take them off, then. (But I'm keeping the heels!)
From: jos@and.nl (Jos Horsmeier)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Please Help
Date: 9 Oct 92 18:43:43 GMT
Organization: AND Software BV Rotterdam

In article <1490004@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> kingsley@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Kingsley Morse) writes:
|
|              Please answer these 435765658 questions and return.
|
|1.) Do you think equal rights for romans and women is generally a good idea?
|Yes                  [ ]
|Sometimes            [ ]
|No                   [X]
|Haven't heard enough [ ]
|Other                [ ]
|
|2.) Are you proboscidean?
|Yes                  [ ]
|Sometimes            [ ]
|No                   [X] but Ethel my hippopotamus still loves me
|Haven't heard enough [ ]
|Other                [ ]
|
|3.) Are you in favor of consumption?
|Yes                  [X] but not raw, not raw ...
|Sometimes            [ ] 
|No                   [ ]
|Haven't heard enough [ ]
|Other                [ ]
|
|4.) Do you think men should be allowed to legally eat their parents
|and siblings before fetal viability?
|Yes                  [X] but not raw, not raw ...
|Sometimes            [ ]
|No                   [ ]
|Haven't heard enough [ ]
|Other                [ ]
|
|5.) What sex are you?
|Male               [ ]
|Female             [ ]
|Other              [X] I have a spare erm ... spare, you know ... thingy!

|6.) How old are you?
|Under 18           [ ]
|19 to 65           [ ]
|Over 65            [ ]
|Dunno              [X] 
|
|7.) What religion are you?
|Protestant         [ ]
|Catholic           [ ]
|Jewish             [X] I used to be two dead vicars, but not anymore ...
|Other              [ ]
|
|8.) What political party are you asphyxiated with?
|Democratic         [ ]
|Republican         [ ]
|Other              [X] *gasp* ...
|
|9.) How many years of education have you completed?
|Grade School       [ ]
|High School        [ ]
|College            [ ]
|More               [X] 8722435 years of kindergarten, and proud of it!

So? What did I win? Did I win? Did I? Yes? did I? did? dididididididid?

Jos aka I think I got an `A'!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: DAN QUAYLE DRUG SCANDAL COVER-UP?????
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 14:29:33 GMT

In article <1992Oct10.132821.1@vax1.umkc.edu> nenglish@vax1.umkc.edu writes:
>Hi!
>I need to know:   Am I crazy??
>;^)
>
>Fri. night, 10/09/92, 7pm, on CNN news, 20 min. Lead Story:
>
>DAN QUAYLE DRUG SCANDAL COVER-UP
>
>Complete story w/ tapes, transcripts, and witness;
>Tapes and evidence pointed straight up to the Justice Dept. and James Baker;
>Tapes were gotten by CNN thru the Freedom of Information Act.
>
>Am *I* the only person who saw this story??
>I have not heard a PEEP about it since it aired!
>
>Has anyone seen this or heard anything about besides ME??

This story has been around at least since the 1988 election - there was stuff
about it back then, the media looked at it a little bit and decided there
wasn't enough evidence to warrant any more investigation. It's come up 
at least once a year since then, while the most recent (before CNN) 
"investigation" being done by Doonesbury. 

-- 
John Switzer               | Why am I voting for Clinton? Because... 
                           | Bill Gates: 36, CEO Microsoft, $6 billion
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Me: 36, Tech Writer, 1978 Diesel Rabbit
jrs@netcom.com             | Screw the nerdy rich! (at least 'til I get there)
From: patricka@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Patrick Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Slick Willie, KGB agent
Keywords: Clinton,KGB
Date: 8 Oct 92 00:38:55 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


1. Ambassador to China
2. Appeasement
 
In the absence of evidence to the contrary:
 
3. Manchu Candidate
 
Love,
Xenu
 
"Ronald Reagan: a triumph of the embalmer's art." - Gore Vidal
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:5481 alt.politics.bush:9383 alt.politics.clinton:10768
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Debate Results, my opinion.
Date: 15 Oct 92 23:27:21 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

<JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>This morning on CNN they were talking about the "floundering" State Department
>and the fact that Jim Baker has let the press know how unhappy he was about
>being pulled-out of the State Department for the election.  Their comment
>was that Baker is beginning to distance himself from a losing campaign.

>Who knows? - Maybe Baker has decided a change in the Presidency wouldn't
>be such a bad thing.

Lets assume both Quayle and Baker have an eye on running for prez in 96.
Who gets hurt worse if Bush loses?  I figure Quayle gets it worse.  So
maybe Baker figures a Bush loss puts him *closer* to the presidency....

							--  Michal
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: New Quayle Quote (NY Times, 10/7/92)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 19:05:26 GMT

In article <7069@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin) writes:
(standard nonsense from Our Boy, deleted)
>
>A Quayle aide explained Dan's problem as follows (same article):
>	"That's the problem with being Dan Quayle.  Sometimes
>	there's a data download as he's shifting gears."  
>If anyone can explain this explanation to me, I would be grateful.

Try this.  It's like driving over a bump while downshifting
and having your coffee cup spill on your lap.

Maybe, Dan-o's sparse neural network is so preoccupied with
functions like pulse maintenance and respiration that
higher functions like reasoning and language present
a likelihood for overload.  Maybe not.

>Remember -- a vote for Bush is a vote for Quayle.  Don't risk it.

With any luck, the electoral vote count from the east and
midwest will be sufficient for a Bush/Quayl defeat,
so those of us on the left coast can start our
election parties early in the evening.

>
>David  (A former Republican and you can thank Bush for it.)
 
Thank you, George.  Another soul saved by sense!


-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: P-O-T-A-T-O-E!!!!
Date: 13 Oct 92 15:23:08 GMT
Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Organization: Iowa State University

In article <92286.220827CWD1@psuvm.psu.edu>, <CWD1@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> I had to.
> You bunch of idiots liking DAN QUAYLE and all.
> Get lives.
> Use your brains
> Open your eyes
> Inhale
> Think for yourself

   We absolutely need to start posting our charter to news.answers or
whatever that uber-group for FAQs and charters is.  This is happenening
a little oftener than is really funny.

Dan
Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
From: cldavies@nyx.cs.du.edu (cindy davies)
Subject: Re: Dan attacked by angry mob!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 02:44:26 GMT

In article <D2150056.fj7gh9@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com writes:
>
>I would never judge the whole state of Iowa by one tourist couple. Actually
>I think it's more indicative of the state of mind of S.F. tourists (sorry;
>juuuust kidding ...). But since you are from Iowa, maybe you can shed
>some light on the state of mind voiced by those people. Exactly what
>did they mean by "they" wouldn't have "allowed" such a thing? I'm really
>curious.
>
I can't speak for Iowa, but, here in South Dakota, you might speak your mind,
but we don't go for those "long haired hippie freaks"(tm) making a spectacale
of themselves.  You might go to see JDQ or GHWB speak, and you might tell
your friends that those boys don't have a McGoverns chance in H*** of getting
elected, but you would listen quietly, and clap briefly.

I don't know for sure what the tourists meant, but, my guess is these rude 
people would have been taught better manners then that.

The campus where I work takes pride in the fact that all through the anti-
everything sixties, there were NO demonstrations of any kind on campus.

No one took over the admin. building.  No one sat-in for anything.  I think
thats what your tourists meant about "they" wouldn't have "allowed"   such a
thing.  Not the police, but the crowd.  The midwestern crowd may well think
JDQ is an idiote who is unfit to hold public office, but "they" wouldn't 
"allow" such rude behavior.

;-) ;-) ;-)

I am not convinced that being nice is really the way to go, but thats the
way we are.  Its time to raise less corn, and more hell.

:-)

--
Life among academics has taught me that a well-expressed opinion is
usually better than a badly expressed fact, so far as professional
advancement goes.  --Gabaldon, Outlander.
cldavies@silver.sdsmt.edu        cldavies@nyx.cs.du.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bena@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Ben Aveling)
Subject: Re: debates
Organization: Monash University General Access Unix
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 09:52:39 GMT

Eric S. Smith (erics@infoserv.com) wrote:
: 
: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
: 
: > In <cass8806.299@elan.glassboro.edu> cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu
: > (KYLE CASSIDY) writes:
: > >i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
: > >
: > >any thoughts on who might win?

Define win.  

Just how many times out of Ten does Dan have to get his name right?
or as Dan might put it (-:

Juste howe manye timse oute ofe Tne dose Dane hav toe gte hise nam righte?

	Ben

Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:5469 alt.politics.bush:9361 alt.politics.clinton:10737
From: JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Debate Results, my opinion.
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:14:37 GMT
 <1992Oct14.024038.15119@cbnewse.cb.att.com>
 <1992Oct14.043504.5165@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
 <92288.051255LDM102@psuvm.psu.edu> <92288.084226JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu>
 <92288.212550LDM102@psuvm.psu.edu>
Organization: Penn State University

In article <92288.212550LDM102@psuvm.psu.edu>, The Ramblin' Man
<LDM102@psuvm.psu.edu> says:
>
>   Surely you aren't stupid enough to think that Vice-president Bush had
>never met President Gorbachev?!?!?  What do you think a vice president
>does, sit home and stay safe, just in case the president dies?!?
>

I think this statement speaks eloquently enough for itself.

Hope this helps!

Jeff Luck              *The opinions are mine, but facts are facts*
CES Systems Office
Penn State University    "Whatever you guys want, I'm for."
JFL4@PSUVM.PSU.EDU            -Dan Quayle to Ohio Farmers, 1988
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: Vice Shrub Showed Up.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:54:01 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1992Oct14.154426.29646@u.washington.edu> sieferme@stein.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:

>This was the RepubliCons plan:  to unleash Our Boy against
>Clinton/Gore.  "Aggressive" is an understatement - DQ sounded
>like someone who had skipped his lithium for a couple of days.
>This was reminiscent of the "original" Dan-Quayl-windup-toy
>who first appeared immediately after the 1988 convention.

    I had the same thought, but he reminded me of the toy that appeared
during the bizzare waterfront ceremony in New Orleans where GHWB first
chose Dane.  It was like he'd been injected with amphetamines.  Although I
agree that Gore was more wooden than I would have liked, there's no doubt
who is more imaginable in the role of president.

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ.
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: What Abortion Controversy?
Date: 9 Oct 1992 22:44:42 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

jhussain@cs.ucsd.edu (Jabir Hussain) writes:

>In article <1992Oct9.025916.2660@utkux1.utk.edu>, rdosser@martha.utcc.utk.edu (rdosser) writes:
>|> Did anybody catch Danny's reflection that, after having talked to people
>|> across America, he came to the conclusion that abortion just isn't
>|> something the American people care about?
>|> This is so lame on so many levels. Not vintage Danny, but the Dan-handlers
>|> have been extremely liberal (excuse me!) with the duct tape lately, and
>|> it seems he's almost run dry.

>actually, the san diego union tribune recently listed the top ten issues
>important to voters.  this is from memory, but something like > 70% said
>the economy.  abortion was way down (about 5 or 6% said it was the most
>important issue for them).  so i would think dan quayle is right on this
>one (i assume he meant "relative to other, more important, issues").

Abortion may not be top of the list issue for most people, but that is 
a far cry from saying that it "just isn't something the American people
care about."  When each year 1.5 million women in this country get an
abortion you'd better believe that it is an important issue!

							--  Michal
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: A Rush By Any Other Name
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:27:36 GMT

In article <P7yasB4w165w@unkaphaed.UUCP> popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell) writes:
>
>Does anybody know if Rant Slugboy ever actually served anytime in the 
>armed forces?  Where was he during the Vietnam era.  4f for gross 
>obesity?

Yes, Rush was stationed in the Philippines during
the Vietnam War.  He was disguised as Mt. Pinatubo.

>Pope Charles   Subgenius Pope Of Houston      28 days to Defeat-Day!


-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: leifmk@Lise.Unit.NO (Leif Magnar Kj|nn|y)
Subject: Re: more bashing
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 18:27:25 GMT

In article <CINDY.92Oct8204112@solan10.solan.unit.no>, cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf) writes:
 > Sunil Gupta writes:
 > >huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
 > >
 > >> Can those Quayle bashers find some place else to masturbate?  This
 > >> place is santified for the genuine fan of The Honourable J. Danforth
 > >> Quayle.  Please return to the original intent.  Thanks.
 > >
 > >Watch it buster! Otherwise we'll start alt.fan.brian-mulroney. Truly
 > >the intellectual peer of Our Man Dan.
 > 
 > And what's next?  alt.fan.king-carl-gustav?
 > 
 > *puts on Swede-proof undies*
 > 
 > -Cindy Kandolf
 >  cindy@solan.unit.no
 >  Trondheim, Norway
 > 
You mean alt.fan.king-cal-gustf, don't you?

Leif Kjnny
leifmk@lise.unit.no
Trondheim, Norway
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: more bashing
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:09:51 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.054237.15655@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
>Can those Quayle bashers find some place else to masturbate?  This
>place is santified for the genuine fan of The Honourable J. Danforth
>Quayle.  Please return to the original intent.  Thanks.  

So YOU'RE the genuine fan.  I had heard that there was one,
and now we know it's true.

"Original intent"?  Wait, that sounds familiar ...
I have it!  Robert Bork, what are you doing in Alberta?

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |

Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:5478 alt.politics.bush:9369 alt.politics.clinton:10750