HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: trig@dkatrig.ka.sub.org (Georg Trietsch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: TTFonts??????????
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 19:45:07 CET
Organization: Trig's Privat System, Karlsruhe FRG

gbh@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Da Hubster!!!) writes:

>>Does any one know of a way to get true type fonts out of the system
>>directory

I moved them in a directory WIN\TTF in the following way:

Copy all installed fonts (*.TTF and *.FOT) into your TTF directory,
then update manually your WIN.INI. Where in the fonts section are
references to the FOT files, change them to your new directory and
restart windows.

If you install new fonts later, copy the TTF file into the TTF directory,
install the fonts as usual but disable the check box for 'Copy files
into Windows directory'. Then you have to move the FOT file which was
generated in your windows directory and update your WIN.INI as written
above.

Sorry, I didn't find an easier way :-(



*********************************************************************
* -----   .    | UUCP  : trig@dkatrig.UUCP       |  Georg Trietsch  *
*  / /- /  /_> |         trig@dkatrig.ka.sub.org |  Karlsruhe  FRG  *
* / /  /   _/  | Voice : +49 721 758452          |                  *
*********************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From:  volt@kaskad.msk.su (Shirin Vladimir Voltovich)
Subject: Does anyone know tools for edit TT font ? 
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 13:27:15 GMT
Reply-To: volt@kaskad.msk.su
Organization: SV KASKAD
Keywords: TrueType Font create edit 
Summary: I want to buy tools for creat or edit TrueType font

Hi,
Please, say me how to creat or to edit Truetype font
or where I can buy tools for it ?
Sincerely,
Volt Simon

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: Adlib card
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 00:18:18 GMT
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.

stu@Warren.MENTORG.COM (Stu Brown) writes:

>Even though Win 3.1 comes with an Adlib driver, it can't play .wav
>files with it (Adlib limitation?).

The AdLib driver from Microsoft will not play digitized sounds.  There
is a file called ADLIBW.ZIP at ftp.cica.indiana.edu which will do this
for you.

You can have both drivers installed at once, apparently.

-- 
#ifdef TRUE         | Fuzzy Fox                  fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0   | a.k.a. David DeSimone      an207@cleveland.freenet.edu
#define  FALSE  1   |
#endif              |         How's my posting?  Call 1-800-ALT-FLAME
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris)
Subject: Re: TTFonts??????????
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 13:50:32 GMT

gbh@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Da Hubster!!!) writes:

>Does any one know of a way to get true type fonts out of the system directory??


1. Create (or select) the directory in which you want the font files to
   appear.  It must be available whenever Windows is running.

2. Copy into this directory the TrueType font files you want to evict
   from the Windows directory.  (Note: this means the *.TTF files only.
   Don't copy the *.FOT files.)

3. From the Windows MAIN -> CONTROL PANEL -> FONTS dialog, remove the fonts
   you wish to evict.  Remember to check the box which asks if you want to
   erase the files from your system.  This will remove both the .TTF and
   .FOT files from WINDOWS\SYSTEM.

4. From the same dialog box, click the ADD... button to open the Font Add
   dialog box.  Specify the directory you copied the .TTF files to in
   step 1; the dialog will list all the available fonts in that directory.
   Select the desired fonts (or click SELECT ALL) and *uncheck* the box
   which asks if the installer should copy the font files to the Windows
   directory.  Click OK.

This will still leave one (relatively small) .FOT file in your Windows
directory for each TrueType font, but will keep the huge .TTF font files
away. 

Joe Morris / MITRE
From: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Why ccizip causes general protectio fault?
Date: 15 Sep 1992 15:20:59 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

Hi folks,
	I have ftp'd ccizip20 from ftp.cica but can't use it.
	Every time I try to run it, I get the logo on the screen,
	but then clicking on the OK box gives me 'general protection
	fault'. Dr. watson reports a bunch of thing I can't follow.

	Has anybody else had similar experience? Any clue
	appreciated. Thanks,

	-Anis Rahman.
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: t-ericj@microsoft.com (Eric Johnson)
Subject: Re: Which Extnd. Mem. - EMM386 or SMARTDRV??
Date: 11 Sep 92 15:55:45 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation

In article <1992Sep8.160708.23798@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> 
ken@netmail.austin.ibm.com (Ken Goach) writes:
>
>My machine (386 25mhz 2 meg RAM) was using the SMARTDRV
>extended memory for Windows 3.1. I got a game that uses
>extended memory out in DOS, and it said that extended
>memory was not found. So a friend suggested that I use
>EMM386 instead of SMARTDRV. The game plays well, but
>how will this effect Windows?

EMM386 and Smartdrive are two entirely different (yet compatible) things.

If it is extended (and not expanded) memory that you need, do this:
Load Himem.sys
load smartdrv, but don't use all available memory for it. The reason you 
probably cannot find extended memory is that smartdrive was using all of it,
leaving none for your game. Read the manual for instructions on making 
smartdrv use less memory. 
You won't need emm386 unless you are using dos 5 and want to load things high,
or you have applications that need expanded (not extended) memory. 
The windows and dos 5 manuals have some good chapters on these. Email me if 
you have any more trouble. Also, let me know your system configuration.
From: pierre@ecs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Problem w/ Win/3 and Trident SVGA 256 displays
Date: 6 Sep 92 19:10:07 GMT

In article <18376.2aaa4eeb@ecs.umass.edu>, pierre@ecs.umass.edu writes:
> Someone please help me with this problem.  I am running win31 w/ dos 5, 
> stacker2, and qemm5.  I have a Trident (Quadtel by msd) SVGA 1 meg card. I want 
> to utilize 256 colors with trident drivers, but can only do it in standard win
> mode (win /s) and not enhanced mode (win /3).  Does anyone have a clue to what
> my problem may be? I tried the beta trident drivers from SIMTEL20 and the 
> drivers from the original system with the same results.  E-Mail or post with
> replies.
> 
> Regards,
>  -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
>  <    Disclaimer: per usual, all opinions are my own and not neccesarily      >
>  <    those of an employer or any other person or thing, live or dead.        >
>  <---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
>  <    Michael R. Pierre  Pierre@ecs.umass.edu  Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst >
>  <---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
>  <   "A cigarette that bears a lipstick's traces,                             >
>  <                     An airline ticket to romantic places.                  >
>   \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
-- 

answered my own question. after reading the post about someone trying to speed
up windows and having no problem with 256 svga, i coppied their config.sys.
omitted my qemm memory manager commands, and used dos's emm and himem. 
reinstalled the trident 800x600 256c driver for 1 meg cards and i have no 
problem.  it may help to note that the problem was a memory address conflict at
B000 that was the comment. when i had qemm5 running. e-mail me if you would like
to know more.



  /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
 <    Disclaimer: per usual, all opinions are my own and not neccesarily      >
 <    those of an employer or any other person or thing, live or dead.        >
 <---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 <    Michael R. Pierre      Pierre@ecs.umass.edu                             >
 <---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 <   "A cigarette that bears a lipstick's traces,                             >
 <                     An airline ticket to romantic places.                  >
  \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: Which Extnd. Mem. - EMM386 or SMARTDRV??
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:10:23 GMT

In <1992Sep8.160708.23798@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> ken@batman.austin.ibm.com (Ken Goach) writes:

>My machine (386 25mhz 2 meg RAM) was using the SMARTDRV
>extended memory for Windows 3.1. I got a game that uses
>extended memory out in DOS, and it said that extended
>memory was not found. So a friend suggested that I use
>EMM386 instead of SMARTDRV. The game plays well, but
>how will this effect Windows?

Loads of misconceptions.  Are you sure what you want is EXTENDED
memory and not EXPANDED memory?  If what you want is extended memory,
you don't have to do anything.  The memory on a 386 or better machine
is automatically extended.

Now, on to what else seems wrong here.  SMARTDRV has nothing to do
with MEMORY, except for using it.  It is a DISK CACHE.  EMM386 and
SMARTDRV have absolutely zero functionality in common.  EMM386 is a
memory manager to let you use extended memory as XMS or EXPANDED
memory.  The reason you didn't find any extended memory when you had
SMARTDRV loaded was that SMARTDRV had all of it for use as a disk
cache.  Windows and SMARTDRV work together, so that SMARTDRV will
release memory to Windows if Windows needs it (and with only 2 MB on
your machine, trust me, Windows needed it).

Frankly, I can't believe you're running Windows on a machine with only
2 MB of memory.  Sure, it's possible, but that just doesn't strike me
as enough memory to DO anything with.

>Also, I heard QMM is better than EMM386. Anyone know?

QEMM (note the 'E'), by QuarterDeck Office Systems, is a much better
memory manager.  It replaces the combination of HIMEM and EMM386.  It
is much more configurable, which means that it gives you more memory
to play with, but that also means that it's harder to set up
correctly.  Also, it seems that Microsoft has a penchant for changing
things slightly as they release new versions of things.  Usually the
change is just enough to break all the third party stuff like QEMM and
DR-DOS.  

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: fournes@belay (Who, me?)
Subject: Re: swapfile location
Keywords: swapfile
Organization: Belay Enterprises Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 01:57:45 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.071417.7517@megadata.mega.oz.au> vince@megadata.mega.oz.au (Vince Sandrone) writes:
>in a multiple harddisk environment is it quicker to
>have the permanent swapfile on the SAME or Different 
>harddisk to Windows (everything else being equal)
>
>thanks in advance

I would think the same drive as womdpws (or most of the apps/data that
you would be running/reading) would make it faster, since then the
read/write heads wouldn't have as far to travel between swap and
application/data.

                                        --- Eugen Fournes
                                path:   fournes%belay@uunet.uu.net
From: jdg00@ccc.amdahl.com (Josh Grosse)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Permanent swap file bugaboo
Date: 11 Sep 92 19:32:08 GMT
Reply-To: jdg00@amail.amdahl.com (Josh Grosse)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

markg@county.lmt.mn.org (Mark Gilbert) writes:

>I am running an IBM Model 80 and Windows 3.1 in enhanced mode.  My machine 
>was locking up when printing the printer.tst document from WordPerfect for 
>Windows.  Physical RAM was low, and a lot of swapping was going on.  I 
>_reduced_ the permanent swap file from 28Mb to 6Mb, and I was able to print 
>the same file that had been hanging....

I think I have an explanation that fits, given three facts.  Firstly, the
permanent swapfile location defaults to the disk where your TEMP environment
variable is located, and where temporary files will be created.  Secondly,
the swapfile is only used for virtual memory operations, not for temporary
files.  Thirdly, the Print manager "spools" your output into temporary files
for subsequent printing.

So, a disk without much freespace may have problems when printing through
the print manager.  I don't know about WordPerfect, but WinWord certainly
creates a lot of temporary files.  Also, if you're printing graphics, or
using a large number of fonts, you can get *huge* temporary files.

I've had this exact problem, when I had more than 3 MB worth of graphic
print output I was sending to a printer, but had only 2.5 MB free space
on the disk.

If you'd like to ensure you've gotten rid of old temporary files, you can
clean out your TEMP directory (when NOT in Windows).  The Print Manger
temporary files all end with .SPL as the file type.  Also, using CHKDSK
once in a while and deleting and .CHK files it creates can help with this
as well.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Grosse                                jdg00@amail.amdahl.com
Amdahl Corp.                               313-358-4440
Southfield, Michigan
From: god@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Communications under Windows.
Date: 12 Sep 92 23:13:51 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

I have yet another puzzle for all of you windows freaks out there.  I
am trying to use Telemate under windows, but neither it or the
Compuserve Information Manager will swap out once they're loaded.
This means that the only Comm program that I'm able to use in Windows
3.1 is the Win100 Terminal Emulator (which doesn't want to download
anything, primitiveness aside).

What great wisdom would you have me apply to these conundrums?  Thanks.
From: bb760597@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu (Blake Buhlig)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Why do software coprocessor emulators lock up Windows?
Date: 6 Sep 92 06:13:51 GMT
Reply-To: bb760597@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu (Blake Buhlig)
Distribution: na
Organization: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO  80523

I tried to start Windows 3.1 the other day with the shareware coprocessor
emulator FRANKE.387 installed as a device, but the computer locked up after 
the Program Manager started.  I also downloaded a couple of different, 
older emulators, but each caused exactly the same effect.  When I tried to load
the ones that can be started from DOS under a Windows DOS-shell, I got an
"Invalid Memory Protection Fault."  I've been playing around with the
SYSTEM.INI & WIN.INI files, but I haven't gotten anywhere.  Incidently,
I've had absolutely no other problems with FRANKE.387.  Programs that wouldn't
otherwise run at all, run fine; those that run slow without it, run faster.

My system is a 386DX@16MHz, 4 megs XMS ram (2 on a BocaRam SIMM card), 
no other TSRs except for HIMEM & BOOT.SYS (which otherwise doesn't cause 
any problems), SCSI drive controller, Unisys mouse (MS clone), Soundblaster, 
modem, game port, SVGA. (No 80387 chip, of course...)

I haven't seen any documentation from MS about these emulators, so I'm
wondering if anyone else has had problems, or if anyone has gotten
Windows to run with a coprocessor emulator.  E-mail replies/suggestions
appreciated!
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Blake Buhlig                                        Colorado State University
 bb760597@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu            Electrical/Computer Engineering
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.window.ms
From: adykes@jpradley.jpr.com (Al Dykes)
Subject: MSWIN Installation Standards
Organization: Unix in NYC
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 17:07:42 GMT

I'm looking for standards for the installation of MS-WIN and 
applications. 

I've inherited a bunch of isolated networks and more stand-alone PCs.
Over time we will be networking them all together.  There are no
standards in place right now.  Every technician (or user)
installs each package as he/she sees fit.  Most users put their
data in the tools' own directory (even on a server !)

I'm looking for standards and techniques for handling the PATH
limitation (every single tool directory wants to be path), Use of
Enviroment space, etc.  

We are starting to homegrow some applications, so I'm also interented 
in developers standards (ie don't expect that your application will be
installed in C:\WINDOWS).  

Thanks in advance.

Al Dykes
--------
adykes@jpr.com
From: s106275@ee.tut.fi (Anssi Saari)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Custom Windows Logo
Date: 6 Sep 92 15:09:34 GMT
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland


In <1992Sep6.130554.10327@debbie.cc.nctu.edu.tw> u8011582@cc.nctu.edu.tw () writes:

> In SYSTEM subdirectory type "win.cnf/b+vgalogo.lgo/b+mylogo.rle/b win.com "

I believe he means "copy /b win.cnf+vgalogo.lgo+mylogo.rle win.com /b". With
4dos/ndos the first /b can be omitted.

> where , mylogo.rle is the image file that you want to change , it must be
> less than 16 colors , smaller than 640x480 and win.com must not exceed 64k
> bytes. 

640x480 with 16 colors *IS* ok.

Anssi

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Anssi Saari                      +          This space for hire !!!         +
+ s106275@ee.tut.fi                +                                          +
+ Tampere University of Technology +         CALL int+358-31-176661           +
+ Finland, Europe                  +                                          +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: schles@whatever.cs.jhu.edu (Philip Schlesinger)
Subject: TT Fonts
Organization: Johns Hopkins Computer Science Department, Baltimore, MD
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 17:50:30 GMT

Hi does anyone know where the ftp site for TT fonts is? - Phil

-- 
Philip Schlesinger                         schles@cs.jhu.edu
------------------------------------------------------------
"How'd you get that Cray II to run slower than my old C-64?"
"Oh, that took a bit of doing.  Take a look at /bin/session"
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: areid@med.unc.edu (Alfred Reid)
Subject: Re: using a mouse in a dos program whie it is a window
Summary: Maximize DOS window in Win 3.1 to make it mouse-aware
Organization: UNC-CH School of Medicine
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 22:00:48 GMT

CKT0@LEHIGH.EDU writes...
>I have been unable to find info on or figue out how to use my mouse in a dos
>appclation while it is running as a window. I am using windows 3.1 and I have
>hurd this is possible. Dose anyone know how? Help would be apprecated.

The DOS window must be full-screen *before* starting the application. 
Don't know if this is generally the case but that's how it works with the
three mouse-aware DOS apps that I use under Windows 3.1 (WP 5.1,
DrawPerfect 1.1, and Lotus 123 2.2).  Your mileage may vary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alfred Reid                                                 areid@med.unc.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of Family Medicine,  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7595.     (919) 966-3711 [voice]; (919) 966-6125 [FAX]
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: swapfile location
From: edowdy@vax1.umkc.edu
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:16:25 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City

In article <1992Sep10.162824.18973@microsoft.com>, t-ericj@microsoft.com (Eric Johnson) writes:
> In article <Bu4w4A.29w@belay> fournes@belay (Who, me?) writes:
>>In article <1992Sep1.071417.7517@megadata.mega.oz.au> vince@megadata.mega.oz.au (Vince Sandrone) writes:
>>>in a multiple harddisk environment is it quicker to
>>>have the permanent swapfile on the SAME or Different 
>>>harddisk to Windows (everything else being equal)
>>>
>>>thanks in advance
>>
>>I would think the same drive as womdpws (or most of the apps/data that
>>you would be running/reading) would make it faster, since then the
>>read/write heads wouldn't have as far to travel between swap and
>                    ^^^^^^^^        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>application/data.
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> 
> I don't know exactly what the answer is; but your reasoning is faulty.
> If the swapfile is on a disk other than Windows and apps, then then heads
> don't have to move at all -- each drive has its own set of heads. 
> I'd put the swapfile on the disk with the lowest access time; if they are
> the same, I'd put them on the disk that does NOT have windows, so those
> heads can stay on windows and its apps, and the other set of heads
> can stay on the swapfiles. 
> 

OR..........You could buy more memory resulting in even less disk access time.
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: poffen@rushmore (Russ Poffenberger)
Subject: Re: Can't use a swapfile on my SCSI disk.
Organization: Schlumberger Technologies, ATE division, San Jose, Ca.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 03:19:35 GMT

bartels@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (Jeff Bartels) writes:
: >>>>> In article <7SEP199213255518@zeus.tamu.edu>, kbm8572@zeus.tamu.edu (BRYAN MILLIGAN) writes:
:  >> News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
: 
:  >> 	I recently upgraded to Windows 3.1 and seem to be having a great deal
:  >> of trouble with swapfiles.  My setup:
:  >> 	386/33 8MB RAM
:  >> 	Adaptec 1542A SCSI Controller
:  >> 	Quantum 80MB and Maxtor 120MB SCSI drives
:  >> 	HIMEM.SYS, EMM386.SYS (Win 3.1 versions)
:  >> 	SMARTDRV.SYS (Win 3.1 version w/ double buffering)
:  >> 	RAMDRIVE.SYS (512K in extended; Win 3.1 version)
:  >> 	ASPI4DOS.SYS (V 3.0A w/ /V option)
:  >> 	MOUSE.SYS, ANSI.SYS, JETSCRPT.SYS (QMS JetScript driver)
:  >> 	MS-DOS 5.0
:  >> I this setup everything works fine until I try and use a swapfile.  With 
:  >> Win 3.0 I could use a temporary swapfile, but I could not set up a permanent
:  >> swapfile.  With Win 3.1 I can't use any type of swapfile.  If I do set one up
:  >> Windows locks up the machine on exit (time for the three-fingered salute), I
:  >> lose most of my program groups, and most of the files on my hard disk are
:  >> corrupted (cross-linked, truncated, etc.).  I really need to be able to use
:  >> a swapfile to run Mathematica proberly (even with 8MB RAM).  Does anyone
:  >> know of a fix for this problem?  Any help would be appreciated. 
: 
: 
:  >> bryan
: 
:  >> kbm8572@zeus.tamu.edu (VAX 9000)
:  >> bryan@aero15.tamu.edu (Sun 4/65)
:  >> (409)845-0714         (Panasonic Easa-Phone)
: 
: My SCSI adapter (Future Domain and Seagate before that) requires a
: segment of high memory (for SCSI BIOS + other stuff). That means that I have to provide a
: x=NNNN-NNNN argument in my EMM386 invocation so that the segment is
: protected from corruption. Check your manual for the Adaptec, it
: should tell you where this segment resides and how big it is. You can
: also probably configure the memory location with jumpers on your
: board.
: 
: Hope this helps. 

Best solution, for Adaptec at least, is to get, and load the ASPI driver. This
will fix all your problems with Windows.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies ATE   UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             Voice: (408)437-5254  FAX: (408)437-5246