From: jsw@cray.com (Jon S. Wood)
Subject: Re: Anti-Male Defenders
Reply-To: jsw@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 11 Jan 93 10:31:58 CST

In article uLN4wB6w165w@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca, lisa@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca () writes:

>>
 jsw@cray.com (Jon S. Wood) writes:
>> 
>> >  Current child support guidelines presume all NCPs (usually men) as jerks?
>> >  Why is that, unless of course this practice of claiming CPs (usually women
>> > as victims and NCPs as evil is the agenda of the Women's Movement 
>> > in order to retain a disportionate amount of unearned wealth?

>>>bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us (Bob Kirkpatrick) writes:
 
>> Aren't you too directed here? 
>> 
>> I keep saying this, and I keep getting ignored. But I'll try one more time.
>> The system screws EVERYBODY one way or another. Women get screwed over, men
>> get screwed over, kids get screwed over. Instead of always throwing rocks,
>> perhaps a better approach is finding those places where changes could be a
>> benefit to all, and get working on those together --even with perceived
>> enemies. All an enemy is, is someone you haven't found a benefit for an
>> alliance with yet.
>>>Lisa
>
>
>Lisa Lambeth                             lisa@oneb2.almanac.bc.ca
 
>THANK YOU, BOB and HALLELUJAH!
>
>AMEN.
>

   Feminist bullshit has spawned studies that supports draconian measures
against NCPs (usually men). I'll throw rocks as long as they continue
to spread ponyshit in the name of 'gender fairness'. 

   I've spent an hour with my Congressmen on a flight from Mpls to National
showing my paycheck, the law, my divorce decree and the Task Force findings
regarding Gender fairness in the courts. He was reluctant. Everybody is
sick of the issue. They have generally made up their minds. It is a 
taboo subject because it IS so individual. Everybody does get screwed. 
The current answer is to really screw one of the parties. 

 When he saw my paycheck, decree, Task Force and the law, I then asked
him:
     Where is the accountability? 
     WHy automatic garnishment? Are all NCPs theives?
     Why does the government (social security) demand accountability and
       not garneshed wages of lawful citizens, NCPs?
     Why is it that advocates of gender fairness advocate sole physical
       custody? Could it be....... cash?
     Why is it that women can remarry and still continue to receive 
      full child support that presumably pays for part of the house 
      payment? 
     Why does the Children's Defense Fund claim a desire for personal
      responsibility to resolve children's issues in their 25 step
      charter, yet their overwhelming lobbying is for increased spending
      and more government intervention?
     Where does her income fit into the guidelines?
     Where in the law does it even mention the CPs income as a factor?
     
 I showed him an article from the Mpls Tribune that claimed the 
percentage of all NCPs paying child support has decreased since the draconian
measures of child support guidelines was passed. I suggested that,
and showed him income factors, that basically says a poor man before
the divorce would rather be dead than stick around and pay the guideline
amounts. It appears the Mpls Tribune dug it up. The social agency personal
couldn't quite figure it out. The congressman did.


He became interested. He wanted more info. He made an appointment with me
to speak with his staff. 

 Some would consider an ex-wife who is angry over a divorce that SHE wanted
is someone who is bordering on lunacy, psychotic or just plain "acting like
a women". Lisa, you wouldn't fit into that category, would you?


Jon

Newsgroups: alt.child-support