From: mjln_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mikeey J. Lin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Pro-Abortion Airheads
Date: 10 Apr 92 04:46:08 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Apr07.071120.8127@liebe.uucp> kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) writes:

>mjln_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mikeey J. Lin) writes:

>>	I would be a little more careful if I were you Theodore. I believe
>>the speaker wanted the right of privacy to her body. I'm not even going to
>>think about what you were implying by your statement. :& As for those your
>>comments about those "loudmouths", I think you are truly IGNORANT if you
>>actually think you solutions will solve the abortion problem. There are too
>>many different situation to consider, too many opposing views. If you don't
>>like something, state it politely and logically.     
>>	
>So where is the politics and logic in your post?  From what I read you're
>simply telling him that he is wrong while insinuating he is "IGNORANT".

	The logic's there, the politic's isn't.  I rather stay away from
politics. If you don't think he was wrong in calling Pro-Choicers Airheads
then I'm afraid I'm wasting my time here my friend. I just stated that he
was wrong, nothing else. If you agree with him here, then I'm sorry for you.

>> 	Who are you to judge whether most abortions are done "for the
>>sake of convience". Have you ever had an abortion? Do you know the situations
>>of most of the women who had abortions? Think twice before you answer.
>>By the way, one more comment about "Pro-Abortion Airhead" from you will
>>probably get you... (you figure it out, you're smart enough) Be nice dude!

>You're so right.  He should have been much more careful when stating a
>politically incorrect idea.  So, pro-abortionists can't be airheads? or
>he's just no allowed to verbalize it?  

	Okay, I guess that I can say Pro-Lifers are Airheads. It wouldn't be
true because there's no logic behind it. (hint hint) Hey! The argument applies
to both parties. He was being extremely one sided. I tried pointing that out.

>While we're at it:  A year ago the press reported the Pro-Death rally
>turnout as some incredible number.  The Park Service in D.C. said they
>only had a small fraction of the number they claimed.  The Pro-Life
>rally (according to the Park Service) outnumbered their opposers 2 to 1.
>Does anyone have RELIABLE figures from this year?

	I don't know why everyone seems to be so proud of the fact that their
movement outnumbered the rival movement. (not directed just at you Kevin)
Is that so important? I personally feel if you believe what you're doing is
the right thing, it doesn't matter how many members you have in your group.
What's important is that you do what you feel is right. These are the people
that I have respect for, despite their views. And when I have respect for
someone, I try to understand their points and ideas, I don't try to flame them.
I really do wish everyone could do the same, maybe we'll learn to listen more
often. It's an idea, I hope people will catch on to this idea.      

						Mikeey
				      (Pro-Choice/ANTI-ABORTION)

PS I really hope you stop using the term "Pro-Death" Kevin, it really does
   offend a great deal of people. Try Pro-Choice, it's less contraversial.

>Kevin Brawley