HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Mutant: question
Date: 8 Apr 92 04:01:51 GMT
Organization: University of Saskatchewan

dethomas@amhux1.amherst.edu (Cerebus in '92!) writes:

>gmf2@quads.uchicago.edu (gary michael feldman) writes:
>: In article <1992Mar31.193619.1@amherst.edu> dethomas@amherst.edu (The Human Torch) writes:
>: >

>On a related note (I can't believe I'm asking this...) Why does everyone
>view Gambit as being so powerful? It seems that Sebasion Shaw or the
>Juggernaut could stand up to him and make him eat that deck of cards...

	Or, for that matter, what about the X - Men's newest member, Bishop?  
He's the one who can absorb projected energy... Seems like the cajun might have
a bit of trouble with him, to.  Not that I particularly like either character, 
I just don't understand why a lot of people seem to think he's so powerful.

>It seems that the Marvel writers are trying to have a contest amongst
>themselves: Who can make the most unbelieveable and powerful "mysterious"
>charcater, who comes out of nowhere and have people think he's cool! I
>mean, look at Cable or Longshot or Bishop for that matter... Sheesh,
>doesn't anybody like doing origin stories anymore? I wanna see someone
>show up, with his identity explained and not able to take out everybody
>and their mother or is immune to everybody's power. Good grief, at this
>rate, thier all gonna be reduced to fist fights because none of them can
>affect each other. :-)

	I agree... although is a straight fist fight (no powers) I take Logan 
any day.  His skeleton and Martial arts skills make him pretty tough even 
without the claws and healing factor.

Dave.

>later days!
>--dt

>--
>Dennis E. Thomas, Vagrant	   |    Amherst _still_ hasn't figured out 
>dethomas@amhux1.amherst.edu 	   |     what do do with me, how could I 
>roach@aux1.amherst.edu		   |    possibly presume to speak for them?
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: paladin@wpi.WPI.EDU (Ever Shifting Bearlike being...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Rogue and Cyclops Questions
Date: 11 Apr 92 16:29:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: wpi.1992Apr11.162959.4573
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute

In article <1992Apr11.035053.18219@wam.umd.edu> rudeboy@wam.umd.edu writes:
>Is there any reason given why rogue can not control her powers?
>Is it just a matter of mastering control or is her power just  
>uncontrollable?
>Is there anyone that her powers don't work on?
>Same question goes for Cyclops, is there something wrong with him or
>is his power just uncontrollable?

Rogue....
	her powers seem to be uncontrolable... professor x has worked with her
 a lot as implied in some of the reading and not gotten very far with control.
	people who are immune... well.. Loki was only partially drained... as
  was Mojo... and mephisto.... others that i have seen are wonder man, as he
  is an energy being,  and the vision (tho he ain't alive) other than that i
  have not seen any others...

cyclops....
	his problem has to do with a head injury that he got when he was pushed
  out of the airplane with havok when they were kids... it damaged that section
  of his brain that can control the blasts... that is why when they did the 
  X-men and Alpha Flight when madelyne could heal... she did and he had control
  over the blasts... 

	hmm... now that i think about it she also "cured" rogue... so maybe 
  there is yet hope...   8)


 Paladin (ever shifting bearlike being....)	     
     Reality	       | " Wouldn't you laugh if your head exploded???  
 		       |	 No.... I guess you wouldn't.....	 
 paladin@wpi.wpi.edu   | I would."   (Nosage, June 91)
	
human is the foulest name i can ever call a person......
From: evan@gauss.math.brown.edu (Evan M. Simpson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Cerebus: Evil Twins
Date: 7 Apr 92 04:39:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: stanley.ku29spINNrgc
Organization: Brown University Math Department
NNTP-Posting-Host: gauss.math.brown.edu


   Here's a wild piece of speculation for you, based on the conversation the Judges are
having on the moon:

   Suppose the one Judge IS Tarim? And further, one of the Regency Elves is Terim?
Naturally, when I say "is" I mean represents, embodies, whatthehellever. My support?
Very weak, but the idea still appeals to me. Between the two pairs we have a whole
slew of contrasts, including light/dark, emotional/rational, female/male, earth/space,
and others I haven't thought of yet.
   Probably all wrong, but heck, it fun to imagine.

   Also, I don't suppose the seventh sphere is a GOLDEN one, do you?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: dml@athena.mit.edu (David M LaMacchia)
Subject: Re: EPIC: Sam and Max
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 05:23:19 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.213458.1@fnalo.fnal.gov> birmingh@fnalo.fnal.gov (Phillip J. Birmingham) writes:
>
>         Okay, so I went to pick up the Sam and Max Go to the Moon Dirtbag
>    (what a mouthfull!) I wanted to see what Sam and Max are like and I
>    only have one question: where can I get more???? 
>
>         Maybe this says more about me than I'd want revealed if I were to
>    run for president, but I thought it was great! I haven't laughed so
>    much since Milk and Cheese #1!!
>

	It's kind of strange how Milk and Cheese goes right along with
Sam and Max, isn't it?

	Well, if you're interested in more (and you should be!) I know of
three sources, all of which you can get cheap.

	Sam and Max Special #1 (published by Fishwrap Press, black & white)
	Sam and Max Color Special #1 (Comico, this time, in (take a guess)
		color)
	GrimJack #52, in Munden's Bar (six page story, Sam and Max go
		back to ancient Egypt, not widely known about)

	Sam and Max also appear in several other places, but not in full-length
stories (well, not that I know of, anyway).

	Oh, and I suggest reading Sam and Max Go to the Moon after reading
the other issues; there are a lot of in-jokes in this issue related to the
other ones.

--dave
Sam: "Okay, here's the *plan*, Max.  You plug the processor opening with your 
tremendous head, and I'll take advantage of the ensuing confusion."
Max: "Don't ever say *ensuing* again."
Sam: "Okay, Max...leap...LEAP!
Max: "No!  It's *dark* in there!  And there's gears and stainless steel blades
and stuff."
Sam: "In you go, little pal!"



Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: uk02700@nx28.mik.uky.edu (mitchell e french)
Subject: Re: MARVEL: Rogue's powers
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 20:04:54 GMT
X-Bytes: 

In article <45261@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> pollerts@mentor.cc.purdue.edu  
(T'vajnxek the Orc) writes:
> 
> I seemed to have missed this, but could someone tell me
> how long Rogue's absorbtion of someones mind and powers
> last!? 
> 
> T'vaj(no it aint my real name)

	Um...it's about 60 seconds of absorbtion time for every 1 second  
of skin-to-skin contact, with some weird occasional troubles.  (For  
instance, there's a chance the transfer will become permanent if contact  
is held for too long -- and then there's the Carol Danvers transfer  
weirdness.....)

Mushroom
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Capt. Frank A. Lauro)
Subject: Re: X-men 8 (a little late)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 04:12:05 GMT

albert@chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Rick Jones) writes:

>In article <1992Apr6.205340.7897@wpi.WPI.EDU> cbuteau@wpi.WPI.EDU (Christopher W Buteau) writes:
>>Ahhhhhh! my friends but who has Scott dated besides Jean Grey and her clone.

>	Actually, Scott did date Misty Knight around X-men 120, when he
>thought Jean was dead, and after Phoenix died, he dated Lee Forrester.

Sorry, Rickster.  If Scott went anywhere near Ms. Knight, Danny Rand would
have handed him his visor.  It was Colleen Wing who Scott rebounded with.

>	And, when Jean thought Scott was dead, she went on a long
>vacation in Greece, where she may have dated someone.  

Wasn't this Mastermind in disguise?
--------
Captain Frank A. Lauro          Commanding Officer       University of Illinois
fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu       USS ALEXA NCC 1764-D     Urbana-Champaign
--------
"What happened to your hair?"
 -- Boothby (Ray Walston) to Picard, TNG: "The First Duty"
From: fhuang@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (->  `BOGUEMAN'  <-)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Professor X (X-Men Cards)
Date: 6 Apr 92 11:10:34 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


	I bought the X-Men card set a few days ago and noticed that
Professor X, the preeminent telepath on Earth, was only rated a 6
(out of 7) in `mental strength.' Jean Grey is also rated a 6 while
Phoenix (Rachel Summers) is rated a 7. All respect due to Jean and
Phoenix and their tk powers, but let's give ol' chrome-dome
wheelchairman some respect.
From: vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vernon H Harmon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Sandman Movie?!? (and Sam & Max)
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:43:27 GMT
	<1992Apr13.084012.7294@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

A Tim Burton Sandman movie? Hmmm..he's already just about got the right
look down--white skin, black hair sticking out--just check out Eddie
Scissorhands............

--Vernon.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: MHART00@ricevm1.rice.edu (mason hart)
Subject: Re: GROO 100
Organization: Rice University, Houston, TX
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 19:40:04 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.164153.24698@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au>
s913391@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au (Antony Ross Lazarus) writes:

>Apparently, something BIG is planned for issue 100... if there are any veteran
>Groo-heads out there who witnessed a special event from a previous series or
>something, what are we in for ?!

Gods willing, the death of Rufferto.  Or at the very least, his departure.

"If you're not having fun, you're doing something wrong."

-- mason
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: jcowling@ophelia.UVic.CA (Scowling Jim Cowling)
Subject: Re: Professor X (X-Men Cards)
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 92 22:06:59 GMT

In article <72822@netnews.upenn.edu> fhuang@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (->  `BOGUEMAN'  <-) writes:
>
>	I bought the X-Men card set a few days ago and noticed that
>Professor X, the preeminent telepath on Earth, was only rated a 6
>(out of 7) in `mental strength.' Jean Grey is also rated a 6 while
>Phoenix (Rachel Summers) is rated a 7. All respect due to Jean and
>Phoenix and their tk powers, but let's give ol' chrome-dome
>wheelchairman some respect. 

If you read the inside of the discarded wrapper, it defines what Mental Level 6
and Mental Level 7 are -- effectively, Level 6 is "multiple powerful psionic
abilities".  Level 5 is "One single powerful psionic ability or a number of 
weak psionic abilities" -- Storm is classified as a Level 5.  Level 7 is
near-infinite mental power.  She kicked Chuck's butt in X-Men #136, as I
recall.

I'm paraphrasing the above, but Chuck's nowhere near an infinite power level.

------
Jim Cowling			|  "Ha!  Pronoun trouble.  It's not 'he doesn't
Creative Writing Department     |   have to shoot _you_ now', it's 'he doesn't
University of Victoria          |   have to shoot _me_ now'.  Well, I say he
Opinions Disassociated          |   _does_ have to shoot me now.  So shoot me
Fnord                           |   now!!"   -the immortal D. Duck
------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Capt. Frank A. Lauro)
Subject: Re: DC: Captain Atom Mini-series
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 23:26:29 GMT

morrow@fnalo.fnal.gov (The Third Elmo) writes:


>[CAPTAIN ATOM] 1-50 were damn good superhero stuff.  We're talking real,
>honest-to-god character development here.  The Cap of #50 was not even close to
>the Cap of #1; the same is true for the supporting cast.

Hear, hear.  And I'd never liked Cary Bates' work in my life before this 
title.

>	Then along comes John Ostrander, who a. couldn't be bothered to read
>his predecessors' work, because he immediately has Cap have trouble with his
>anger, even though Cap has gone through Purgatory to purge himself of said
>anger! and b. immediately brings in two or three dozen concepts (Rasputin,
>"Dark" Firestorm) that had completely failed in _Firestorm_.

Be fair -- CAPTAIN ATOM was pretty hosed already by the time Johnny O signed
on to close out the series.  (Say, who *did* write issues 51-63ish?  John
only did the last four issues.)

>	Then the character gets handed over to incompetent hack/"I know an
>editor, so I can get writing assignments" Jonathon Peterson, who proceeds to
>turn him into a puncheminnaface character in stories with a negative IQ.
>	PFUI!  Time for another scathing letter....

Not that it'll do any good; Petersen will probably handle the letter page,
too.  [EX: "Just stick with us for forty-two more issues and the payoff
will be PHENOMENAL!!! Trust Me!!!!!!]
--------
Captain Frank A. Lauro          Commanding Officer       University of Illinois
fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu       USS ALEXA NCC 1764-D     Urbana-Champaign
--------
"What happened to your hair?"
 -- Boothby (Ray Walston) to Picard, TNG: "The First Duty"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: uk02700@nx28.mik.uky.edu (mitchell e french)
Subject: Re: Rogue's and Cyclops' control of powers
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 19:25:44 GMT
X-Bytes: 

In article <1992Apr13.123419.1@camins.camosun.bc.ca>  
comp138w142@camins.camosun.bc.ca (Scott) writes:
> I seem to remember a story where Loki was trying to get more power from 
> "They who sit above in shadow". To do this he gave the world some sort 
> of energy beam that, if you entered it, your dreams would come true (in 
> exchange for your best talent or skill). When Cyclops came out of the  
beam 
> he had control of his blasts.
> 
> Don't know about Rogue though.
> 
> Fair Winds...
> 
> Scott.

	That was in the X-Men/Alpha Flight Limited Series -- excellent  
story, BTW.  The "beam" would give a person powers (if they didn't have  
any to begin with) and take away their creativity (a little detail Loki  
"forgot" to tell anyone).  The first group of people to enter the "beam"  
gained powers that could help the world greatly.  For instance, one could  
create food and clothing in any amount.  Another could control stone to  
make it form buildings.  
	
Mushroom
From: nc313127@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Movies? who came 1st: Aliens or Brood?
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:31:17 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <92093.090140EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>, EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu (Ernie Oporto) writes:
> In article <1992Mar31.114348.88465@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au>,
> ugoni@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au says:
>>
>>And Sauron is taken straight out of Tolkein's "The Lord of The Rings"
>>
>>Antony
> 
> Um....Sauron is no new character.  At least if you dont enjoy him, you
> cant blame Liefeld....  Now that we're comparing X-Men villains with movies,
> can you say Brood=Aliens(I, II and 3)?  Anyone know if the Brood came before
> the Alien did, or not?  I suspect the movie came first.
> 
>   _____)           ______        _)       _)  EAO102@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
>                                __       __    Ernie "SHOKK" Oporto
> ______    ______            ___      ___      Computer Laboratory
>                                __       __    Attendant for the Penn
> (_______ _      _ ________ _     _) _     _)  State CAC Department
the Brood came first.

"Hey Elf, Don't forget the beer!" - Wolverine, X-men #172
From: jrd@frame.com (James Drew)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: DC:  92 Preview
Date: 8 Apr 92 22:51:31 GMT

Gary Lewandowski (lewandow@floss.cs.wisc.edu) writes:

>Martian Manhunter
>It's set in 1960 [...] involving flying saucers and the cuban missile crisis.

Wasn't that 1962?  (October.  You know, with the JLA/JSA/All-Star Squadron
cross-over.)

>Ambush Bug

Has either a Legion or LEGION appearnce in it, as I recall.

>Peter Cannon-Thunderbolt
>[he] learned how to use 100% of his mental capacity,

New Teen Titans #2.  Ravage.  The Terminator's son.  Burned himself out.
Maybe they'll tone this down to only 90%, and do a Deathdtroke cross-over.
*I* can *har*dly *wait*.

>Titans Stuff
>Terra joins the New Titans.

How was she brought back from the dead?  Easy.  Her brother, Geo-Force, was
shot and killed in Batman and the Outsiders #1, buried, and the earth brought
him back to life.  What happened to Terra?  She was crushed by tons of rock,
and then *buried*.  It obviously took a little longer for the earth to get
through the coffin and fix her up.

>Batman
>	A new superhero joins the DC universe in Batman:  The Sword of Azrael.

So much for seeing *that* Titans character come back.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                             |     Every time I go to the beach, I have to
Jim Drew                     | smile when I see how ridiculous people look with
jrd@frame.com                | vivid white sunscreen just on their noses.  That
(Furry: Randy Puritan)       | smile is the only way I can keep from laughing
"Innocent, but not naive."   | out loud.  When I went to the nude beach, and
B2h t w- c k s g+(p) rv p    | saw where else that sunscreen goes, I almost
S8/5 g l+ y+ o+ a+ u++- j++  | went into convulsions.
{opinions: mine != frame's}  |        - Marc Lynx, "Once More Into the Briefs,
                             | 				Dear Friend"
From: mwinston@lust.reed.edu (Michael J. Winston)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: MISC:DC:Whatever happened to....?
Date: 15 Apr 92 06:47:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Apr15.064700.23582
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR

In article <1992Apr15.051052.19414@sol.UVic.CA> jcowling@ophelia.UVic.CA  
(Scowling Jim Cowling) writes:
> In article <AduuIZ_00WDK84bUMe@andrew.cmu.edu> Vernon H Harmon  
<vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> >I was just reading some old comics and I was reminded of a question  
I've
> >been wanting to ask ever since I first found r.a.c.--whatever happened
> >to T.M. Maple? Anyone who read DC Comics in the 80's I'm sure knows who
> >it is I speak of--except that I'm not sure if anyone ever really knew
> >who it was. He/she had letters published in just about every lettercol
> >DC had during the 80's. Does anyone know who this person is/was and/or
> >where he/she is now (I haven't seen any letters from him/her for
> >years...)??
> 
> He's (he's a he, but I don't remember his real name) is now doing  
reviews for
> Amazing Heroes...or will be until #203, when the magazine goes on  
hiatus...

I remember asking this same question a few months ago.  The few responses  
I got pretty much said he retired (which I already knew).  Also, someone  
said he/she was in an APA with T.M.  (I think his real name is something  
like Jim or John Burke.  He revealed it in an issue of Action Comics  
Weekly when he announced his retirement).

Michael J. Winston
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Marvel's overused lines
Date: 9 Apr 92 04:58:19 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Apr8.013506.17677@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> dddawson@lpl.arizona.edu (Doug Dawson) writes:
>In article <1992Apr7.185716.17967@njitgw.njit.edu> bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler) writes:
>>In article <6APR199218590717@rigel.tamu.edu> rjc2870@rigel.tamu.edu (CLAYCOMB, RICHARD JAMES) writes:
>>>In article <92095.224213RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu>, RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu writes...
>>>>characters as if they all talked liked Wolverine i.e "We take care of our
>>>>own".  Man, if I read that damn line again, I'll rip that page out and eat
>>>>it. 
>>>
>>>Tell me about it.  The same old lines are starting to annoy me.
>>>example-"The psychic knife!  The totality of my psychic powers!"
>>>       -"The psychic knife!  The focus of my psychic powers!  Against it you are
>>>         helpless."
>>>       -"The psychic knife!  The focused totality of my psychic powers."
>>>
>>>Some new lines for the whole team would be nice.  I could handle it. :)   
>>
>>How about this overused line: "I'm the best there is at what I do, and what I
>>do best isn't very nice.  I have an adamantium-laced skeleton and claws and a
>>mutant healing factor..."  This one's used more often than the psychic knife
>>bit.
>
>Well, there is a distinction between the two.  Wolverine's "I'm the
>best..." bit is his standard narration-introduction, not something he
>says; I don't think I've ever seen it in a speech-balloon or in quotes.
>
>Psylocke's "Focussed Totality" on the other hand, is definitely part of
>her dialogue.  She seems to feel a need to explain it to everyone she
>has ever used it on...including her teammates, who have heard her say it
>hundreds of times by now.  In a lettercol a while back, someone asked if
>she would ever stop saying that...they said (paraphrased) "No."
>*Although I should note that I think I saw her avoid saying it once in
>the new series...really surprised me.)

True, (about Wolverine's) but they still use it WAY to much (dialogue or
otherwise).

All right, it's not X-Men, but how about "Ah'm pretty much invulnerable
while ah'm blasting."  Looks like X-Farce needs some new lines too.  (Like,
the lines used to draw the pictures.  Cheap shot on Rob Liefield (sp?))

Anyone else got any Marvel lines that they're sick of hearing?
From: dream@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Morpheus)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Can Spidey fight? (was Re: Over used lines)
Summary: Not!
Date: 17 Apr 92 03:59:24 GMT
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana

> 
>   This reminds me about a trend I was noticing with the Friendly neighborhood
> web-slinger.  It seems that everytime he loses his trusty/handy-dandy spider
> sense, he gets mopped up by the opposition.  This always tends to make me
> lose faith, in whatever skills I had believed spidey to possess. I think
> that maybe there should be a series where he loses his spider sense for a 
> whole bunch of issues and has to learn some real defensive skills.  What do
> you all think about this?


I don't think so, that would be really stupid.  As a plot device in some 
stories it can be neat, challenging for Spidey to come up with something 
to get him over.  but taking it away fro more than in issue or two is messing
with the integrety of the character.  Spidey is based in the *few* powers he
possesses and to take something like that away would change the character.
I think that having Venom and the Hobgoblin being able to occasionally
overcome the spider-sense is enough to allow him to use pure skill to prove
his metal.  He has, beaten the tar out of Venom and Hob-Goblin
even WITH this disadvantage.  IMHO, it would just be stupid to take it away
just to see him get beaten up for a couple o' issues.  

Who knows and maybe you'll get your wish with Stan-the-Man's 2093 Spidey.

I know I won't be buying it. 

Well there you have my opinion....

Mike Simon

"Thank you, thank you, I'm here all week....try the veal..."  Portrait of 
a Stand up Comic. 1991 (Aaron Montgomery)
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: MUTANTS: X-Traitor Theories Disproved
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:10:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucsu.1992Apr14.201056.6837
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder

Andrew Farrel(afarrell@maths.tcd.ie)
>I've only been reading X-thingies since X-Men #1 (the second) So this is all
>IMHO, but the sooner they get rid of the Walkin' Talkin' Ahcent the better.
>^L
>Shugah.

HEY RUBE!!!
This is a call to all RFCers and defenders of the SOUTH everywhere(this means yo
u too DAUM)

Let's flash fry this dude!!!!

----------------SCAVENGER

(I've been up all night workin' on a paper, so I'm feelin' a little vicious-sorr
y)

-- 
If some unemployed punk in New Jersey, can     |kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu <-I.NET
get a cassette to make love to Elle McPherson  |
for $19.95, this virtual reality stuff is going|No matter where you go,
to make crack look like Sanka. -  Dennis Miller| there you are."-Buckaroo Banzai