HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cf@planck.physics.purdue.edu (Coleen Flanagan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Sex!
Summary: Here's my list.
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:38:42 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Physics Department

Ok, here's my input on what/who I find sexy on DOOL (in no particular
order): Ok, Ok, since Jack is my #1 fave guy he would naturally be at
Numero Uno on my list.  So I guess there is a certain order here!

Who I find sexy:

JACK: Beautiful blue eyes.  Love the expressions Jack gives Jen especially
      when he's stifling a laugh. Has absolutely DyingToRunMyFingersThrough
      hair, charmismatic personality, not macho but still manages to be
      sensual without a prop bedroom in sight, and has the best comedic
      timing in daytime.  Did I mention his to-die-for blue eyes???  I did?

BO:         To be quite simple he was cute!  No one could wear a beard
(Reckell's  like he could.  Showed variety of emotions (his first time 	
Bo Brady)   in Salem), bonded well with the rest of the Brady clan, could
            brood like no other rebel before him, and frankly he had
            one nice body!

JOHN: Nice looking, soft voice, and is the sexiest to me when holding
      Brady.  He cuddles well.  He needs to do more comedy.  I miss
      the times he traded barbs with Diana.  John needs to get out of
      the loft more and mingle.  He needs female companionship.  I think 
      DAYS should show him dating a variety of women so viewers could 
      enjoy John in a lot of different situations dealing with various 
      personalities.  It could be fun and definitely entertaining.  

LARRY:  Was a lot more debonair and attractive to me when he was at his
        most diabolical.  He's handsome, wears suits as well as Jack
        does, striking eyes, and when he shows his love for Nikki one
        can see his vulnerable side.  



Who I do not find sexy:

Bo (RKK's version):  I found him handsome when he was on AW and often
        thought he would make a good Bo.  Unfortunately I was wrong.
        He has the overall look of him but that's where it ends.  He
        is always mad, disgusted, impatient and definitely cocky.  Gone
        are all the qualities that endeared the viewers to this once
        popular character.  Bo and Alice had a special bond, so did Bo
        and Kim, and Bo and Kayla.  If RKK can't evote the same kind
        of feelings Bo had with the Brady's then there is no way he's
        going to do the same when Hope returns.
        
Roman:  I always liked how well Wayne and Reckell worked together.
        After Wayne returned I thought Drake and Reckell's scenes
        together far outshined Wayne's.  Never was a Roman and Marlena fan.



         ======
         Coleen
         ======
From: geosits@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Tad's face is shown, anybody care?
Date: 14 Dec 92 09:47:33 -0500
Distribution: usa,world
Organization: Georgetown University

In article <Bz47t3.IKo@ns1.nodak.edu>, gaspersi@plains.NoDak.edu (Mark G) writes:
> Well ratsters, Tad's face was shown at 12:56 (Central Time) on Dec. 11.   
> Boy, does he need a haircut!  
  I am glad I'm not the only person who noticed this.  You'd think 
with all the hype surrounding Tad(Ted)'s return, they could have spent 
$12 for MEK to go to the barber!!!



  How come nobody posted this before I did?
> I wonder who that older lady is that was with him.  I also wonder why he
> is trying to get a hold of Dmitri?  Hmmmmmmmmm.
> 			
> 				Mark G.

Suzannne Geosits
Georgetown University
Geosits@guvax.georgetown.edu
From: doreen@svl.cdc.com (Doreen Kasson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: Tuesday comments
Date: 16 Dec 92 17:26:08 GMT

Well, another show completely dedicated to Bo and Carly...

Anyone else notice just how much the word "Hope" was used?  Maybe it
was just a coincidence.

All right Phillip!!!  I knew I liked this guy.  So now we have both
Jack and Phillip questioning Carly's decision not to tell Bo about
Nikki. 

Continuity!  They remembered that Andrew was kidnapped.

Is it public knowledge that Carly and Lawrence had a child together?
I was under the impression that the only people who knew about it were
Vivian, Jennifer, Bo, and maybe Caroline.  If this is so, then why was
everyone so upset about Viv taking Nikki instead of being shocked that
Carly gave birth to the tyrant Lawrence's son?

I just couldn't muster up enough to feel sorry for Carly, even when
she was sobbing at the end of the episode.  All she is thinking about
is herself.  She should be thinking about how all this is going to
affect Nikki once he learns the truth.  His world as he knows it will
be completely turned around and he may not accept it.

Back to Bayview!!

-- Papayayaya

**************************************************************************
"I took a picture that I'll have to send | Doreen Kasson
People here are friendly and content     | Control Data Systems, Inc.
People here are colorful and bright      | Santa Clara, CA  (408) 496-4164
The flowers often bloom at night"        | doreen@svl.cdc.com  or
-- R.E.M                                 | doreen@duck.svl.cdc.com
**************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: Happy Birthday
From: Nelson Broat <NMBCU@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Date: Wednesday, 9 Dec 1992 16:21:46 EST
Distribution: usa
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center

In article <1992Dec9.131701.5173@cbnewsh.cb.att.com>, saj@cbnewsh.cb.att.com
(john.suravlas) says:
>
>Today is the birthday of Joyce Johnk, distinguished member of the New
>Jersey delegation.
>
>               HAPPY BIRTHDAY DEAR JOYCE!
>
>I wish you many many more.
>Why do I get the feeling that I surrounded by Sagittarians??

Because fate had that in store for you thats why. :-) Mine's in two days.
Happy Birthday Joyce from me the lone member of the NY contingent. Ah well.
:) *Nelson shrugs his shoulders* :)

>John

Nelson
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: Mike.Dunnagan@launchpad.unc.edu (Mike Dunnagan)
Subject: Re: GH: Update Mon. Dec. 14
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:29:49 GMT

Quoting Sus.:

> But before I start today's update, I have to ask a question (which 
> can probably only be answered by asserting IOAS): Why doens't Ryan
> have any blond roots by now?

What the heck is IOAS? As far as his hair, that's one of a million
continuity flaws in this plot.

> But then Scotty notices something: Lucy is
> wearing the same pin that "faux-Constance" was wearing in the picture.

What followed was so funny to me. I've been saying it over and over all
day <g>. Scotty is staring at the pin, and Lucy asks him what he's staring
at: "I'm looking at your pin, not your pin cushions!" That cracked me up.

> He gives her 48 hours to come
> up with a plan. She's thrilled, but immediately starts trying to wheedle
> more time out of him.

I must say that I was a little disappointed in our favorite counselor.
What's going to happen if they don't recover the art, and Sean and Co.
find out that Scotty with held evidence of Lucy's envolvment? What if they
do recover it, does Lucy walk "Scot" free? At least we will see the best
couple on GH together again. It sure beats Scott and Twiggy.

> Ned has gone home, where he remembers all of Jenny's lies: being a 
> virgin, then the father of the baby being a teenaged boy, etc. He
> sits in the dark as he hears Julia leave a message for Jenny telling
> her that she needs to see her.

Hey Ned....get over it. As if he is so g'damn virtuous. I can hear him
now...."You told me you were a virgin. What will all the guys think when I
tell them that you aren't. I am a man, and a man's #1 fantasy is to
de-flower a young nubile woman..whah whah whah, I'm not a real man." God
this guys a bonehead.

Mike
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: holst@xenon.arc.nasa.gov (LAURA HOLST)
Subject: Re: GH: Bill, say it ain't so...
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Ames Res. Ctr. Mtn Vw CA 94035
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:01:00 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.152735.55089@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, ams1@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ANN M. SCHADLER) writes...
>In article <1992Dec16.000824.16288@samba.oit.unc.edu>, Mike.Dunnagan@launchpad.u
>nc.edu (Mike Dunnagan) writes:
>>Quoting Nick:
>>
>>> Since it was my turn to do the grocery shopping this week, I of course
>>> bought one of the Soap Opera rags.
>>
>>I'm too embarrassed to do that. They might think I'm some kind of a freak
>>or something <g>.
> 
>Mike --
> 
>    You shouldn't feel this way.  My personal opinion of guys who pick up Soap
>    magazines is -- WOW -- I wish my BH would show some interest!!!  I admire
>    a guy who is willing to admit (and not be ashamed of) watching soaps!!:-))
>    I can't stand when THEY (the other types who won't give soaps a chance)
>    put down people who enjoy watching and reading about soaps!
> 
>    Sorry to get on this kick but my BH (whose name is also Mike) is one of
>    THEM!!:-((
> 

Yeah! What she said!
I'm personally sick of the stupid stereotype of:
"THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO WATCH SOAPS ARE PATHETIC HOUSEWIVESS,
ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO".
It's not only ridiculous, it hurts.

> 
>-- 
> 
>Ann Schadler
>Vice President for
>Student Affairs Office
>x83890
>AMS1
--Laura Holst
Internet:  holst@xenon.arc.nasa.gov  Decnet:  XEN::HOLST
Snail Mail:  NASA/Ames Research Center  MS 219-1
             Moffett Field, CA  94035-1000
Live:        (415) 604-6588
From: mjmh@crsa.bu.edu (Michael J M Holmes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC: Terrence needs a life
Date: 11 Dec 92 17:42:43 GMT
Organization: Boston University Center for Remote Sensing


I *know* that people, for some reason, seem to really
have it in for Brian, and I know he's no saint, but
when Terrenc came over to chat with Brian (really just
to yell at him), I got *very* angry with him.

Like, all of a sudden, Terrence is 'Mr. Expert' when
it comes to LOVE??!!??  What, he's had ONE girlfriend
ever?  And have we ever even seen them kiss???

Brian's dated Haley, married An-Li, and currently is
dating Dixie.  Whether or not he's *learned* anything
from these relationships is another thing, but
Terrence needs to give Brian a little bit more credit.

Plus - wake up Terrence!  The only people who can
decide if Haley and Brian are in love is Haley and
Brian!!!  Its not Terrence's decision!!  Fastest
way to lose a friend, or to make a couple closer,
is to vehemently disapprove of them.

Personally, I *hate* the idea of Brian and Haley
getting back together...

mike "not excited by Terrence's 'angry young man' routine"
holmes

:)
-- 
========================================================================
Mike Holmes       mjmh@crsa.bu.edu           "Happiness Will Prevail!"
Boston University Department of Geography (a truly GREAT place to work!)
========================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: AMC: Who will find Tad?
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:39:25 GMT

In article <1992Dec13.150000.14209@umiami.ir.miami.edu> ahelmers@umiami.ir.miami.edu writes:

>God, I do remember all that Mitch stuff.  How about this:  Phoebe plotted to
>break up Hillary and Mitch by finding this "wife" of his stashed away in
>Mexico...then it turned out that Mitch had married her to get her into the
>country after her husband, his best friend, was killed...and so on and so on. 

Gosh, Ann, I don't know *how* you remembered that! I had totally forgotten
and would have never remembered!

What a memory! :) But now that you mention it....it does ring a bell!

Carolyn "no new posts yet..." Zaccaria
From: hither@yohn.Corp.Sun.COM (Thomas Yohn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Sex!
Date: 18 Dec 1992 20:32:56 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: hither@yohn.Corp.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: yohn.corp.sun.com

I have been reading these and found them really interesting.
It seems the one thing we all agree on is that each of us
has a different standard for sexiness. 

So, who would I put on my list? Thanks for asking:

Susan Flannery's Laura was the sexiest woman on the show.
I even went to see "Towering Inferno" just to see her in that
pink shirt. I may have to start watching the Bold and the Beautiful.

SSH as Julie. Yikes! What can I add that anyone else hasn't. 
She is dynamite. 

The original Mary Anderson. She had that wholesome, girl-next-door
look. She was cute. But, it was her personality that made her sexy.
She wasn't just Chris's Sunshine, she was mine, too.

Kristian Alfonso as Hope. That hair. Those eyes. Those lips. And
along with Julie, one of the closest things to a strong woman
that DOOL has ever had. 

Deidre Hall's Marlena: There is a qualifier for this. Before she
returned last spring. Physically she really is a knockout. And I 
really like that slight overbite she has. But, what really made her
sexy was her personality. When she and Roman first got together, and 
when she and Don were together, she was a lot of fun. Smart, playful 
and funny. But, now she is just arrogant and cold. 

Arlene Sorkin's Calliope: Beautiful, smart, funny, clever. Great 
clothes. Ok maybe not great, but atleast original. Everything she
did had her personal stamp on it. I like women who aren't afraid
to stand out. 

Toomces
From: VECTRGSJ@VAX.CSUN.EDU (Gail Said Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: "Mrs. Bo Brady"
Date: 15 Dec 1992 18:33:13 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Tim Mizerak felt compelled to comment :)
[...]
>In article <50431@shamash.cdc.com> doreen@svl.cdc.com (Doreen Kasson) writes:
>>me my sisters.  When Jennifer, who is considered a professional working
>>woman, and a public one at that, changed her name from Horton to
>>Deveraux, nobody complained.  OK, so maybe ANYTHING Camelface does will
[...]
>was the notion of calling someone "Mrs. John Doe", in this example, 
>"Mrs. Bo Brady".  And yes, she did say it once.   I have a problem with
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So what?  It's a pretty harmless thing to say and doesn't imply in the least 
that that is how she plans to be known from now on.  It was her wedding day.  
She was happy to be marrying the man she loves.  She was going from "Miss" to 
"Mrs."  Sure, she can be Mrs. Carly Brady.  But by saying "Mrs. Bo Brady" in 
this particular instance she accentuates the fact that she is marrying Bo.

>name.   Some of Susan's relatives address birthday cards to her as 
>"Mrs. Timothy Mizerak" and it makes me nuts.  They knew her for 22 years
     		            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Uh ... no comment.  :)

>>>Personally, it made me gag.  When a woman willingly reduces herself to
>>>an extention of her man, I am enraged.  I am another of those who kept
>>Now, tell me just how is a woman reducing herself to a mere extension
>>of a her husband have anything to do with the changing of her name?
>>I'm sorry, but I must take offense to this.
>
>But Doreen, would you want to be known as "Mrs. Matthew Kasson"??

If someone referred to Ivan and me together as Mr. and Mrs. Ivan Johnson it 
wouldn't exactly freak me out.  :)  But, again, I don't think Carly's one 
statement had any implications as to how she would be addressed in the future. 
Seeing as how she's a doctor, "Dr. Brady" seems likely to me.  :)

		      	     __.        |
		      	    /  |  __. . |
			   (__/|/(_/|_|_|__)
			      /| gsaidjohnson@vax.csun.edu
			     (_/ Computer Center / Cal-State Northridge*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     *This post, of course, has nothing whatever to do with the university.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: pmmuggli@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu  (pauline muggli)
Subject: Re: AMC: update for 12/14
Originator: mdtll@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:05:22 GMT
Distribution:  world
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

  Joni Snyder <JSNYDER@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>  girl@slavery.EBay.Sun.COM (Mary >Smith) says:

>>>>6a) Is the boathouse where Dixie lost her virginity?

>>>I thought Adam seduced her right in the Chandler mansion, like
>>>in her servants' quarters or something.  I definitely remember
>>>there being a real bed and the thing I remember the *most* is
 
>>I remember it being the boat house.
 
>The way I remember it was:  Adam and Brooke had a fight over the
>surrogate mother stuff.  Adam went to the boathouse and was drinking
>right out of a bottle.  Dixie followed him to console him.  I think
>Adam offered her a drink, too.  Before you know it Adam was taking
>off her blouse.  One thing always puzzled me, why would anyone have
>a bed in there boathouse?  A few more things, Does Adam live on the
>water?  Have we ever seen water near his house?  Does Adam own a boat?
>If not why does he have a boathouse?  Why does the boathouse look
>like Ruth and Joe's attic?
 
memory is trying to get in gear, but it keeps slipping.

brooke either got suspicious, out right accused adam or
discovered about adam and dixie after she discovered a gold
(plated?) pen she had given him as a present on the floor of the
boathouse.

memory gone once again.  that was all i remembered, but i don't
remember how it fits into the overall discovery...

pauline "who wants to help TAD get his memory back?  let's count
 the volunteers...  me, of course, than mary, caz, ..." muggli

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Mrs. Bo Brady
Organization: AT&T
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:05:59 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.154809.29091@chpc.utexas.edu> Joanna L. Castillo <pefv702@utpe.pe.utexas.edu> writes:
>timothy.j.mizerak wrote:
>they seem to be surviving just fine.  I guess I tend to address things
>to "The Johnsons" or "The Mizerak Family".  Is that acceptable to you,
>Mr. Mizerak?  :)

Yup, just fine.

>>           "Veni Veni"   by   Mannheim Steamroller
>Yes!  So...how many is that for me?  I do believe I'm ahead of the pack
>as far as all-around stats are concerned -- even if I am forced to wait
>for the Wheel of Fortune round to win.  :)


I think that makes two, maybe three.   Vince is in the lead, I do
believe.   

>Joanna.
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: Mike.Dunnagan@launchpad.unc.edu (Mike Dunnagan)
Subject: Re: GH: A&D w/SOM
Summary: I love you for this <g>
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:39:24 GMT

Laura:

I won't quote what you said, because I don't want to give it away (maybe
you could tell me how to do that ^l thing), but this is the best news I've
heard this year. Aaahhh this is hope after all. Please please please let
it come true. <g> I know it's silly, but I hate that woman soooooo much.
She's not worthy.

Mike
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: toni@dmntor.UUCP (Toni Spurgeon)
Subject: Y&R - Jack
Organization: Digital Media Networks, Toronto, Canada
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 16:47:50 GMT


Sorry Sucheta.... as the regulars well know... I despise
Peter Bergman's Jack! You must be more of a romantic than me...
as your description of his Jack sounded accurate and palpable...
but when I watch, I LONG for Terry Lester's Jack. (with the ONE exception
of Jack's recent snarky comments about Jill. He actually had
me laughing... first time EVER! Normally I fervently wish
for Terry Lester's charm and his sarcastic bent on everything.
Jack's edges were rough... but you maay not have been watching
when he did (briefly) turn around while working at a homeleess
shelter... he even fell in love and did noble things.... WITHOUT
eing the saccharin putz that I so often think of Bergman's Jack!
This, of course, is all my opinion! You are entitled to yours...
but this Jack is a new character to me... NOT JACK!! For that
matter, so is Ashley.... but that's another paragraph!
Keep on posting! 
Toni
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: teresak@IMD.Sterling.COM (TK)
Subject: HF:  How to Attack!!!
Followup-To: rec.arts.tv.soaps 
Organization: Sterling Software
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 16:07:22 GMT
X-Md4-Signature: ea72d022a9e387c8cac50846fdbfca83

     Hello All!

          Well, I tried to post the same about HOMEFRONT being
          "shelved" last friday (12/18/92) but was having trouble
          with my server.  Anyway, we are up and going again, and
          am I happy to see all the responses that have showed up
          up so far.  Has anyone mentioned contacting TV GUIDE,
          which set up the first "SAVE OUR SHOW" that did it for our
          show.  Maybe we could ask them to interview networks that shelve
          Emmy Winning Shows before they ever get a chance???

          Anyway, I'm still on an Anti-"Civil Wars" kick right now.
          ABC has pushed this show so hard at the public, and basically 
          stole our original night and time that set up HOMEFRONT to
          the winner that it is!!!  Anyone else notice this???  Quite
          frankly, any show that has to use nudity to get an audience
          in the way Civil Wars did is off my list of even "I'm too
          board to change channels on the tv".  This is just another
          LA LAW rip-off, which deals with the same subject week after
          week after week.  Very Boring, no creativity.  HOMEFRONT 
          supposedly had the greatest number of responses with the 
          SAVE OUR SHOW campaign.  However, I read recently that many
          fans had trouble finding it on the network, didn't know the day
          or times, (it switched so often), and many had thought it 
          was cancelled after the first season.  We need to emphasize
          to ABC, TPTB, and Lorimar productions that HOMEFRONT was never
          given a chance!  And that for what they (HF) were given, they've
          turned it to gold!!!  I'm still a firm believer that HOMEFRONT
          should be moved back to it's old slot of Tuesdays, 9:00pm (CST),
          to gather it's old followers again, and get it out of the lineup
          of such "terribly written" shows as "Delta" and "Room for Two"  
          (I think that's the name, the one with the star from "ALICE").

          Anyway, I'm also requesting for any addresses that need to be
          written to, in addition to the following:

                       HOMEFRONT
                       c/o Lorimar Television
                       10202 W. Washington Blvd
                       Culver City, CA  90232

           I had saved this address from a previous post when the show
           had first began.  Please post!  And Save the HOMEFRONT!!!

           Thanks for readings some of the ramblings!   ;-)

                                     Keep the Homefires Burning!!!

-- 
                                            TK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
All the world's a stage and most of us are desperately unrehearsed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps