HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jpl@nrtc.nrtc.northrop.com
Subject: [jpl@nrtc.nrtc.northrop.com: gcc bug]
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 10:32:08 GMT

------- Start of forwarded message -------
Status: RO
X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	[nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil "^From:" nil nil nil])
Received: from geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu by albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu (5.65/4.0) with SMTP
	id <AA00486@albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu>; Sat, 5 Dec 92 19:37:46 -0500
Received: from nrtc.northrop.com by geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (5.65/4.0) with SMTP
	id <AA13543@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu>; Sat, 5 Dec 92 19:37:37 -0500
Received: from charming.nrtc.northrop.com by nrtc.nrtc.northrop.com id aa07049;
          5 Dec 92 16:32 PST
Received: from bat.nrtc.northrop.com by charming.nrtc.northrop.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA22645; Sat, 5 Dec 92 16:37:23 PST
Message-Id: <2397.723602241@charming.nrtc.northrop.com>
From: Jeff Lankford <jpl@nrtc.nrtc.northrop.com>
Subject: gcc bug
To: Roland McGrath <roland@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Cc: jlankford%nrtc.northrop.com@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 92 16:37:21 PST
Reply-To: jlankford@nrtc.nrtc.northrop.com
Organization: Northrop Research and Technology Center
Location: One Research Park, Palos Verdes, CA 90274
Telephone: 310/544-5394

Roland,
	i'm posting directly to you, since i believe that
	you maintain gcc and glibc.
	i ftp'd latest copies (gcc-2.3.1 and glibc-1.05)
	from prep.ai.mit.edu a week ago.
	i built for sparc-sun-sunos4.1.1.
	ive never built glibc before, but have built previous
	veersions of gcc, gas, gld, ....

	Problem: build of glibc fails with puts.o and putenv.o,
	with something like the following messages:
	puts.c:10: conflicting types for `puts'
	puts.c:5: previous declaration of `puts'

	Demonstration:
	/* gcc bug demonstration program */
	typedef unsigned long int  ANAME;
	extern int FUNC (const char *__s);
	extern ANAME strlen (__const char *__s); /*comment this line or move up */
	int FUNC (const char * s)
	{
        	return 0;
	}

	compile as "gcc -c junk.c" and get
	junk.c:10: conflicting types for `FUNC'
	junk.c:5: previous declaration of `FUNC'

	Solution:
	i don't have any simple solution at this point, because the
	make of glibc is too hard to change and the bug is in gcc anyway.
	note that the problem has to do with builtins (ie, strlen).
	if you comment out the strlen line or move it up one line,
	the compile succeeds; you can play around with changing strlen to strXXX.
	This is too bizarre for me to grok, but maybe you have a
	simple fix?
	the config line to build gcc was
	./configure --target=sparc-sun-sunos4.1.1 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
	the config line to build gcc was
	./configure sparc-sun-sunos4.1.1 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
	and i had a configparms file (which i based on INSTALL instructions):
	override stddef.h =
	override stdarg.h =
	defines := -D__SIZE_TYPE__='unsigned long int'

	Why do i think the INSTALL instructions are wrong?
	Any help you can give is appreciated, since i haven't had time to
	monitor the gnu-utils-bugs newsgroups.
thanks,
jpl

------- End of forwarded message -------

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: torsten@kain.UUCP (Torsten Bischof HA 3362)
Subject: GCC+Tools for Intel 960
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 09:55:39 GMT

Hi there !
How can I get the actual version of gcc960 and the other GNU 960 development
tools ?  I did not find them in german mail servers and cs.umn.edu gave the
following response:

Connecting to cs.umn.edu
220 mail FTP server (SunOS 4.1) ready.
--- logging in as user=anonymous password=ftpmail/torsten@kain.uucp...
---> USER anonymous
530 User anonymous unknown.

So what's the best way to get the tools ?

Thanx in advance

Torsten
-- 

/       \   ! Torsten H. Bischoff; Siemens AG Abt. AUT 6114
| o   o |   ! Frauenauracher Str. 80     D-8520 Erlangen
|   ^   |   ! Tel:    (0)9131-98-3362
\  \_/  /   ! Internet:torsten@kain.uucp      ! Packet:df6nl@db0box (pbbs)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,gnu.g++.help,gnu.misc.discuss
From: bothner@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Per M. Bothner)
Subject: Re: gcc include directories
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 05:40:10 GMT

In article <ABRAHAM.92Dec16110802@loke.iesd.auc.dk> abraham@iesd.auc.dk (Per Abrahamsen) writes:
>[changing versions] seldom gives problems with the other utilities, as the
>data format of the files they manipulate stay reasonable constant.  Not
>so with g++. 

But different versions of other utilities may have different bugs.

>The assembler, the linker, and the C libraries goes into 
>
>	$GNUHOME/lib/gcc-lib/$ARCH/$VERS

Only if you install them by hand.

>The only problem today is that libg++ for some reason is not assumed
>to be in that directory, both the gcc and the libg++ distribution
>seems to expect that all versions of gcc will share the same version
>of libg++.  This is a pain, and we have to change both by hand to
>correct the situation.

Do you have a suggestion?

>Bothner> The more general (and standard) way to select versions is by
>Bothner> installing different versions into different directories.

>And break object (and possibly source) code compatibility for all
>users when we install a new version of g++?

So use /gnu-921201/bin instead of /new/bin.  I don't see any
real difference between:
	/gnu-921201/bin/gcc -c foo.c
and:
	gcc -V921201 -c foo.c

My opinion is that gcc -V is a special-purpose, ad hoc way to
manage multiple versions.  I don't think it gives you anything you
can't do with appropriate converntions - and these conventions
are much easier to tailor to individual requirements (from
no versioning to very sophisticated schemes).

	--Per Bothner
Cygnus Support   bothner@cygnus.com  bothner@neon.stanford.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: dorgival@topazio.dcc.ufmg.br (Dorgival O Guedes Neto)
Subject: Where can I find info on C++ and ObjC in gcc?
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 09:50:58 GMT

Hi there.

I don't think the subject is clear enough (my fault),
so here it goes: is there any doc somewhere about the
features of the C++ and Objective C languages as
processed by gcc 2.2.2 ? I mean, till g++-1.4* I
remember reading on differences and special features
of the C++ language recognized by g++. Is there anything
like that for C++ and Objective C as 
implemented in gcc 2.2.2 ?

Thank you.

--dorgival

P.S.: Please send any answers to my e-mail, since
I am not a subscriber to this list.

+---------------------------------------+-------------------------+
| Dorgival Olavo Guedes Neto            | dorgival@dcc.ufmg.br    |
| Distributed Systems & Network Support |                         |
| Dept of Computer Science              | FAX:   +55(031)443-4352 |
| Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais  | PHONE: +55(031)443-4088 |
+---------------------------------------+-------------------------+
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: rickb@apple.com (Rick Boarman)
Subject: Help!
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 06:32:17 GMT



Help! I'm trying to install gcc on our machine (vax) here at
work. The first make process went smoothly. I did get some
operator overloading warnings but no errors. When I ran make stage1
it errored out:

apple.com: make stage1
if [ -d stage1 ] ; then true ; else mkdir stage1 ; fi
mv *.o insn-flags.h insn-config.h insn-codes.h  insn-output.c insn-recog.c
insn1
mv: insn-attrtab.c: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: stamp-attrtab: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: stamp-proto: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: xgcc: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: cc1: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: gcc-cross: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: cc1plus: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: cc1obj: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: enquire: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: protoize: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: unprotoize: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: specs: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: collect2: Cannot access: No such file or directory
mv: ld: Cannot access: No such file or directory
*** Exit 1 (ignored)
rm -f stage1/libgcc.a
cp libgcc.a stage1
cp: libgcc.a: No such file or directory
*** Exit 1 (ignored)
if [ -f /usr/bin/ranlib -o -f /bin/ranlib ] ; then ranlib stage1/libgcc.a;
elsei
ranlib: cannot open stage1/libgcc.a

What went wrong or who should I talk to get some help? Anything
you can suggest would be appriceated.

Rick

rickb@apple.com
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: tito@di.unipi.it (Tito Flagella)
Subject: profiling on gcc
Organization: Dipartimento di Informatica, Universita' di Pisa
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:59:18 GMT


I want to profile a programe with prof or gprof, but if I compile the files using
g++ -pg the I get the following:

g++ -o groebner -pg -DGNU MonomialList.o algebra.o poly.o BaseItemList.o PairList.o PolyList.o groebner.o main.o
ld: Undefined symbol
   LBE50
   LBB50
   LBE40
   LBB40
   LBE41
   LBB41
   LBE31
   LBB31
   LBE42
   LBB42
   LBE32
   LBB32
   LBE43
   LBB43
   .....

Anybody can help?

Tito Flagella
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tito Flagella	             email:   tito@di.unipi.it

work address:
        	Dipartimento di Informatica, Universita' di Pisa 
        	Corso Italia 40 56125 Pisa, Italy
        	phone 39 (0)50 510213
        	fax   39 (0)50 510226

home address:
		Via S. Rocco 14/e 56010 Asciano Pisano (PI), Italy
		phone 39 (0)50 856184

To steal from one is plagiarism, to steal from many is research

	Wilson Mizner.

Pensa alla salute

	Anonimo Meridionale.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: gilles@osf.org (Gilles Benati)
Subject: libg++-2.3 with gcc-2.3.1 on HP9000/720
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 20:50:57 GMT

(repost)

I need some help to compile libg++-2.3 on Hp9000/720 HP-UX
I got the HP binaries of gcc-2.3.1 from jaguar.cs.utah.edu (including gas)

I run `configure hp9k720' them `make all'.
The compilation dies in libg++/src
	gcc -g -O -nostdinc++ -I.. -I. -I./../iostream   -c BitSet.cc
/usr/tmp/cca13777.s:unknown:FATAL:XXX symbol_value: scope=0, type=1073799168

I get the same error in many other files :
src/BitString.cc, src/Fix.cc, iostream/strstream.C, iostream/PlotFile
I got discouraged and stopped compiling at this point.


Here is a more verbose output of what is happening :

	gcc -v -g -O -nostdinc++ -I.. -I. -I./../iostream   -c BitSet.cc
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hp700-hpux/2.3.1/specs
gcc version 2.3.1
 /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hp700-hpux/2.3.1/cpp -lang-c++ -nostdinc++ -v -I.. -I. -I./../iostream -undef -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUG__=2 -D__cplusplus -Dhppa -Dhp9000s800 -D__hp9000s800 -Dhp9k8 -DPWB -Dhpux -Dunix -D_HPUX_SOURCE -D__hppa__ -D__hp9000s800__ -D__hp9000s800 -D__hp9k8__ -D__PWB__ -D__hpux__ -D__unix__ -D___HPUX_SOURCE__ -D__hppa -D__hp9000s800 -D__hp9000s800 -D__hp9k8 -D__PWB -D__hpux -D__unix -D___HPUX_SOURCE -D__OPTIMIZE__ -g BitSet.cc /usr/tmp/cca14464.i
GNU CPP version 2.3.1 (hppa)
 /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hp700-hpux/2.3.1/cc1plus /usr/tmp/cca14464.i -quiet -dumpbase BitSet.cc -g -O -version -o /usr/tmp/cca14464.s
GNU C++ version 2.3.1 (hppa) compiled by GNU C version 2.3.1.
 /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hp700-hpux/2.3.1/as -o BitSet.o /usr/tmp/cca14464.s
/usr/tmp/cca14464.s:unknown:FATAL:XXX symbol_value: scope=0, type=1073799168


First, I thought that I didn't have the right version of gas but it is said
to be working equally well on 700 and 800 series.

Isn't this version of gcc supposed to be working on hp9k720 ? I only see
reference to hp9k8 on the compiler output, though the binaries are stored
in gcc-lib/hp700-hpux.

I saw quite a few patches for libg++2.2 on hp. Do I have to go through all
of them and try to figure out what is still to be needed on libg++2.3 ?

By the way, is it necessary to run fixinclude on hp ?

I would appreciate any help.
Thanks.

Gilles
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: smiley@akasha.eng.hou.compaq.com (Colin Smiley)
Subject: Re: Problems building GCC on SCO systems
Organization: Compaq Computer Corporation
Distribution: gnu
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1992 21:23:49 GMT


In article <9212071040.AA10051@noa.csrl.aoyama.ac.jp> rms@noa.csrl.aoyama.ac.jp (Richard Stallman) writes:

   There are problems building GCC on recent SCO systems.  Several people
   have found an apparent solution of defining STDC_VALUE as 0.  This
   appears to work, but it is actually incorrect because it causes GCC to
   define __STDC__ as 0 *all the time*.

   This is incorrect because GCC is supposed to handle __STDC__ the same
   way on all machines: namely, it should be 1.

   The reason people are tempted to make this change is that the SCO
   header files expect __STDC__ to be 0, and get confused if it isn't.
   However, fixincludes is supposed to change the conditionals in the
   header files so they will work properly with __STDC__ == 1.  So the
   problem should be limited to the compilation of GCC itself.

   Can anyone find a way around this problem which alters only the
   compilation of GCC and does not alter what GCC does when installed?


Here is what I did to get GCC to work on a SCO3.2v4 box...

I first happened upon the idea of changing "X_CFLAGS= -D__STDC__=0" to
"X_CFLAGS= -U__STDC__" in ./config/x-i386s4.  This worked fine for
building the initial stage with rcc.  I soon found out that this was a
bad idea when I tried to make the stage1 compiler.  The SCO assembler
would bail out while working on core.c and I could get no furthur.

I then tried defining "X_CFLAGS = -DSTDC_VALUE=0".  This worked just
fine and GCC compiled with a good result from "make compare".  After
installing GCC, I used fixincludes.svr4 instead of the regular
fixincludes, and all I had to do was create syslimits.h (Which I stole
from a bad install of GCC 2.3.1, but with a successful fixincludes).
Everything seems to be working fine and I have been getting all sorts
of other tools that I have been suffering without to compile.

Hope some of that helped...


Colin

P.S. While I am in the compiling mood, has anyone gotten X11R5 to
compile on a SCO 3.2.4 box (No, we do not have ODT on many of our
machines)?


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colin Smiley, Compaq Computer Corporation, Houston, Texas 77269-2000
e-mail: smiley@compaq.com                           Phone: (713) 378-8426
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer:  Any opinions expressed here do not reflect the opinions of
Compaq Computer Corp.  They make computers.  I make noise.
From: keith@msmri.med.ubc.ca
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: SUGGESTION: Include libg++ in the next version of gcc.
Date: 17 Dec 1992 17:05:20 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: msmri.med.ubc.ca

Since gcc-lib is included in gcc-2.3.2 why not include g++-lib
in future releases of gcc.  This would make installation of gcc 
much easier.

Keith S Cover
Physics, UBC
Organization: Queen's University at Kingston
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 11:38:30 EST
From: Harry Boumeester <BOUMEEST@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: GNU C EMX

I am look for GNU C EMX for MSDOS.  I have checked barnacle.erc.clarkson.edu,
wuarchive.wustl.edu, and prep.ai.mit.edu.  Does anybody know where else I
can look or know where it is that I can FTP it.
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: root@ibibel.glas.apc.ORG (Admin)
Subject: robotussin 1.9 & COFF .init section
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:50:53 GMT

Dear 8:-),
Would you like to tell me the version of binutils exists,
and whether robotussin from them properly handles .init section in COFF
(robotussin from binutils 1.9 ignores .init section (I'd tryed to treat it
as a .text, .data and even .bss section: it keeps robotussin&ld happy,
but cause "core dumped" when enquire executed. Any help would be greatly
appreciated. By the way what is .init section?

Thanx in advance,
AGL (Anton Tropashko)
From: fmk10@amail.amdahl.com (Furqan Khan)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: gcc include directories
Date: 16 Dec 92 23:51:19 GMT
Reply-To: fmk10@amail.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corp.

Hello. NEED HELP!!

we installed the gcc, g++ etc by following the installation procedures
word for word. However we are missing the C++ support libraries and all
the C++ include files.

Thanks in advance for the helper.

Thanks.
Furqan Khan
From: ebrown@husc9.harvard.edu (Eric Brown)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: help: want to use tcov with gcc
Date: 17 Dec 92 15:06:18 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

I would like to run 'tcov' (or an equivalent) to find out how much of
my code is being executed.  When I use the '-a' option with gcc I get
the following message:

	ld: Undefined symbol
            ___bb_init_func

I am runing GCC 2.3.2 on a SUN4.

I check the source, and it seems like the code to put this function in
libgcc.a on runs on the SUN3.  Is this correct ?

Does anyone know how to get this to work on the SUN4?

Thanx,
ebrown@husc.harvard.edu
From: K.Young@cs.ucl.ac.uk (Keith Young)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Help with building a cross-compiler.
Date: 14 Dec 92 16:24:12 GMT


I am mailing on behalf of a student who is attempting to install gcc as a cross
compiler.  The compiler is to run on a sun4c and produce code initially for a
sun3.  He then wants to use this as an example to build a cross compiler for
a custom RISC chip.  However, he is unsure as to how to obtain a cross-assembler/cross-linker.  Could anyone who has experience of such matters and is willing
to help please mail:

aumweni@cs.ucl.ac.uk

Thanks.

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,gnu.misc.discuss
From: kevin@edscom.demon.co.uk (Kevin Broadey)
Subject: Can gcc cross-compile to Transputer code?
Followup-To: gnu.gcc.help
X-Attributions-By: Supercite 2.2
X-Disclaimer: These opinions are mine: others available on request.
Organization: EDS-Scicon, Milton Keynes, UK
X-Newsreader: GNUS 3.14.1
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:10:57 GMT

My company are on the look-out for a `C' compiler that runs on a Sun
SPARC and produces code for a T-425 Transputer.

Does gcc have this capability?

Please e-mail info. I'll summarise if you ask.

Kevin
--
.signature: no such file or directory
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: bel@nosc.mil (Robert E. Laughlin)
Subject: Help With a Cross Compiler
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:00:44 GMT

Hello;

	I have put togather, I think, a cross compiler to run on a Sun os 4E.
	The cross compiler will, I hope, generate code for a 68020 on a special
	board with no operating system.  I have made my own crt0.o.  I have
	gas and gld etc.  I am now trying to make "cross-test".  Every thing
	seems to run correctly until gld gives me an error message; "Can't
	find g" or "Can't find c".  I can find no indication of what kind
	of error would cause these messages.

	I would sure appreciate it if some kind soul would email me,
	bel@nosc.mil, and give me a clue.

	Thanks in advance bel
-- 
Robert E. Laughlin     Naval Ocean Systems Center (NOSC)
email	bel@nosc.mil	
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: kushmer@bnlux1.bnl.gov (christopher kushmerick)
Subject: Loading gcc 2.2 from Mango
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 03:36:29 GMT



I grabbed the files from mango for gnu gcc 2.2  . From the first file, 
I used backup to extract a file, KITINSTAL.COM, which is a com file that
builds everything.


However KITINSTAL.COM dies on my computer after asking for a top
directory for BISON. The comment is "Object of call not found" or 
something close to that.

Has anyone else had trouble with this instal com file? Has it worked fine for
people?

I tried telling it that I did not want to install bison. It dies anyway
with the same message. So I doubt that the problem is with setting up the
Bison directory.

Has anyone modified the install com to work? If so, could you mail me your
version?

thanks



-- 
Chris Kushmerick
kushmer@bnlux1.bnl.gov


-- 
Chris Kushmerick
kushmer@bnlux1.bnl.gov
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: jimlynch@netcom.com (Jim Lynch)
Subject: Re: Help!
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 20:30:58 GMT

In article <9212190609.AA14495@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman) writes:
>Apple's look and feel lawsuit attacks the freedom of programmers
>generally.  Today's suit has just two defendants, but indirectly it
>attacks all of us.
>
>You appear to work at Apple.  Whether or not you personally support
>the lawsuit, to help you install GCC on a machine at your office (at
>Apple, it would seem) would be directly helping Apple business.  I
>sometimes do favors for strangers, but not for strangers like Apple
>that are trying to hurt me.  I hope other readers feel the same.
>
>I am sending this message because (1) perhaps you personally don't
>realize what a bad thing your employer is doing, and (2) perhaps some
>of the other readers don't realize either.
>
>Perhaps you personally don't approve of Apple's lawsuit.  If so, you
>can show you really mean it by starting a political discussion of
>whether it is unethical and whether Apple is morally obligated to stop
>it.  This requires some courage--management will order you to stop,
>and you will have to refuse on the grounds that everyone has a duty to
>consider an issue of conscience--but showing courage is what can
>demonstrate that people should not blame you for what Apple does.
>
>
>Those readers who think they are allowed to write programs and won't
>get sued for doing so, should read the information published by the
>LPF about the danger of monopolies in software.  Then, if they'd like
>something to be done about the problem, they can join the LPF.
>
>The League for Programming Freedom is an organization that works to
>protect programmers' freedom to write software, opposing enforced
>monopolies such as Apple wants to create.  The LPF is not a free
>software organization and is not related to the GNU project.
>
>More information about the LPF is available in the directory doc/lpf
>on ftp.uu.net.  To contact the LPF, send mail to lpf@uunet.uu.net.
>
>You too can join the LPF; some Apple employees are already members.

RMS should know that there IS renewed interest in gcc at Apple.
From: montnaro@spyder.crd.ge.com (Skip Montanaro)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: GCC code generator for TMS320Cx0 DSP?
Date: 16 Dec 92 16:28:18 GMT
Reply-To: montanaro@ausable.crd.ge.com (Skip Montanaro)
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GE Corporate Research & Development, Schenectady, NY


Does anybody know of GCC/G++ a code generator for the TI TMS320Cx0 family of
DSPs?

Thanks,

--
Skip (montanaro@crd.ge.com)
From: fmk10@amail.amdahl.com (Furqan Khan)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: GNU C EMX
Date: 16 Dec 92 23:48:11 GMT
Reply-To: fmk10@amail.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corp.

Hello, NEED HELP!!

we installed the gcc, g++ etc. we followed the instructions word for word.

However, we are missing all the C++ header files and C++ libaries.

If anybody can solve this install problem, please let us know.

Thanks.

Furqan Khan
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: leisner@wrc.xerox.com ( Marty Leisner)
Subject: getting include files
Reply-To: leisner@eso.mc.xerox.com
Organization: Xerox
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 23:00:17 GMT

I want to add an include option so ctwm and vtwm can get include the
twmrc files...

I looked at the preprocessor grammer for a clue how to do this (I'm not
a yacc expert).

I couldn't find anything...anyone want to give me a hint on where to look?


--
marty
leisner.henr801c@xerox.com  leisner@eso.mc.xerox.com
Member of the League for Programming Freedom