HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: larry@b8.b8.ingr.com (Larry Billings)
Subject: Re: Network projections
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:55:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.125548.20468@osf.org>, Terri Buchman <buchman@osf.org> writes:
> >
> That's right!  Two of my brothers live in NH and the fact that they
> face the highest property taxes in the nation makes them proud to be
> New Hampshirites.   The Republicans would never allow a state sale
> tax or any other broad-based tax to be used for the improvement of
> schools in the Granite State.  After all, if the people want better

Excuse me but Al Gore's home state funds their schools entirely or almost
entirely from property tax.  And the property tax is extremely high compared
to the wage range.  I grew up there and still own property, the value of which
does not compare to my property/house here (the tennessee property is all
woodland) yet the anual taxes are ten times what I pay for my house.  I don't
live there or ever plan to, so I'll never have a child in the school I'm
supporting.

>  
> 
> TerriB.


Larry Billings
Most of us are sad, No one lets it show,
I've been shadows of myself,How was I to know?         Eagles
*******************************************************************************



Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8148 alt.rush-limbaugh:9220 alt.politics.bush:13485 misc.test:12843 talk.bizarre:37212 alt.politics.clinton:16352
From: barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: 11 Nov 92 09:55:14 CST
Distribution: usa
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1dr3l6INNmot@spool.mu.edu>, marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach) writes:
> In article <1992Nov10.171300.11448@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

>>Man, I can't believe the complaints I'm getting with my sig - isn't it amazing
>>that for 12 years, Democrats have been ridiculing Reagan, Bush, Quayle, and 
>>anything conservative, yet when they are finally victorious they allow no 
>>dissent whatever? I was going to change this sig after about a week or so, 
>>John Switzer               | Impeach Clinton!
>>                           | Support the coup!
 
> Your .sig points out what kind of a narrow-minded person you are.
> And your summaries point out not only your single-minded devotion to
> whatever Rush limbaugh says, but the fact you have no life.  Why?
> What kind of life must you have that the best thing you can think 
> to do with your time is type up 'summaries' of the Rush Limbaugh
> show.
 
> Marc Rassbach    marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu    If you take my advice, that
> MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
> my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmmm, looks like you've been a hypocrite, sir, and a narrow minded
one!  Why, how can you say that "if it was said on UseNet, it must be
true"?  That's the most ridiculous-
  What's that?  Have I ever heard of a sense of humor?  Why, yes,
that's why I assumed John put what he did in his .sig.  If you don't
find it funny, tough; a lot of Republicans (myself not included - I'm
an independent) found Quayle jokes insulting, but people like you kept
on anyway.
  And if Mr. Switzer wants to post Rush summaries, more power to him. 
It's his time and his peroggative.  I suggest you review the meaning
of "free speech".  

-Jeff
From: crb2@Ra.MsState.Edu (Chad R. Berthelson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Liberal Trojan horse?
Date: 9 Nov 92 15:31:21 GMT
Organization: Mississippi State University

ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:

>Even if it's not true, the result is the same.  If any one thing caused the
>Republicans to fall, it was the efforts of that gang...

>A fact for which I will be forever greatful.

I don't know if you realize this (looking at your .sig, I doubt it) but
'forever' is a LONG time.  I remember 1976 people of your persuasion
said very similar things.  I only wish the rest of America could
remember those same years, whad'ya wanna bet that their memories are
about to get jarred?

>-- 
>*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //   No God, Know Peace   /\     * 
>*                    Kelley L. Miller  //  Know God, No Peace    /P \    *    
>*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  //                        /____\   *
>*****************  James Trafficant for US Senate, 1998  *****************

I'll pray for you (because I care, but don't worry...it won't hurt).

Chad  (your friendly neighborhood Christian  ;-)  

--

Chad R. Berthelson		Graduate Research/Teaching Assistant
crb2@ra.msstate.edu		Biological Engineering
cberth@abe.msstate.edu		Mississippi State University
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8282 alt.president.clinton:259 talk.politics.misc:59324
From: nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle)
Subject: Re: Percentages and such like
Organization: Psych Department, Indiana University
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:55:34 GMT

marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach) writes:
>nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
>>young@ssdd475a.erim.org (Peter Young) writes:
>>>The problem in this election is that no one was passionately FOR
>>>anyone.
>>claiming that being a passionate supporter of *any* politician is a wise 

>Oh my.  And I was passonatly supporting Andre Marrou.  Strike one.

    No actually that was probably strike two. Strike one was not spelling 
"passionately" correctly when Peter Young gave the correct spelling 4 lines 
above yours...

>>trust in politicians, lawyers, insurance salesmen, or talk radio hosts.

>Egads!  Say it's not so!  Say I shouldn't stop listening to Rush 
>Limbaugh III, lest my passion get away from me!

    Ok, "You shouldn't stop listening to Rush". I'm confident that your 
passion will remain intact regardless of what you do, so why not listen to 
some light entertainment along the way?

>>>So let's talk about Rush: is he gonna keep on losing weight do you
>>>think?
>>    I'd say so. From the dietary info he was describing a few months back 
>>I'd say that if he sticks to his better eating habits then he's bound to 
>>lose weight.

>On that topic (Rush), what ever happened to Ginger?

    She got a free dinner at Rush's expense, and that's about all that ever 
came of it. I guess that either he got cold feet or she thought better of 
it before it came to the awful extreme of becoming the 3rd Mrs Rush Limbaugh 
III.

--
Nathan Engle                        Software Juggler
Psychology Department               Indiana University
nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu      nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: phz@cadence.com (Pete Zakel)
Subject: Re: November 3, the day Rush dies!
Organization: Cadence Design Systems
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 21:31:48 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.011312.901@netcom.com> mvp@netcom.com (Mike Van Pelt) writes:
>In article <92308.165203MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> Mark 'Mark' Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>>Naw. You have to admit one thing, Republican Presidents are much *funnier*
>>than Democratic Presidents.
>...
>>Carter on the other hand was no fun to satirize.
>
>Hmm... Remember "The Pepsi Syndrome"?  Dan Ackroyd?

And what about the "killer rabbit" episode?

Or "I have lusted in my heart"?

-Pete Zakel
 (phz@cadence.com or ..!uunet!cadence!phz)

"I don't wanna little wabbit in my little row-boat!"
From: lanier@acpub.duke.edu (Dustin Lanier)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush shoots own foot again!!
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:09:10 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

>ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:

>>On today's (11/10) Limbaugh show, Rush once again demonstrated his
>>hypocracy.

>>He stated clearly that "This taking of human life, WHATEVER you want to
>>call it, must stop".
>
>>At the end of the show, he reported on the execution tonight of a person
>>in Illinois (I assume), and commented on the gala celebration that would
>>be held at EIB affiliate WLS in Chicago AFTER the execution, punctuating
>>the comment with that arrogant chuckle of his.

I heard the show too, and I can say as a non-dittohead listener (i.e. I do
disagree with him on things) that Rush was making fun of this situation.  
His chuckle was the same kind he makes when he deadpans by agreeing with
certain callers he doesn't agree with.  I think that "gala" which is what
they called it, not Rush, is disgusting and I got the feeling from the way
Rush said it he felt the same way.  It is possible to support capital 
punishment and not be happy about it, and anyone who celebrates it in such
a grotesque manner is a few sandwiches short of a picnic.

Dustin
From: cliftonr@netcom.com (Pope Clifton)
Subject: Re: Liberals want to remove Admendment #10? (was Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: t.b, t.p.d, & a.d
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 08:17:13 GMT

Curtis Yarvin (curtis@cs.berkeley.edu) wrote:
: In article <1992Nov9.225116.7508@novell.com> bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner) writes:
: >>
: >>See, what it says is that the powers which aren't delegated to
: >>the United States by the Constitution, or prohibited by it to
: >>the States, are reserved to the States, right, or to the people.
: >
: >Hmmm, I guess Austin's water is low of clueides because I'm confused
: >also.
: >Here's a for instance: suppose I get my jollies juggling whiffle
: >balls.  Do I have a right to juggle whiffle balls?
: 
: [cogent and concise explanation of 10th Amendment deleted]

Curtis,
  Do you think you could switch into law school and try to graduate by,
oh, about mid-January?  There might be a vacancy on the Supreme Court
soon, and you're the kind of man I want to see filling it.
  Respectfully yours, 
  -- Clifton

--
Home: cliftonr@netcom.com     +1 808 521 9073
Work: clifton_r@verifone.com  +1 808 625 3234
Pope of the Church of the Subgenius in Paradise
"Have a revelation, the first one's free/Soon to be addicted to eternity" - HMR
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.president.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: yystg@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (STEVE GRAHAM)
Subject: Re: Network projections
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 13 Nov 1992 10:25 EST  

In article <1992Nov13.035334.20400@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes...
>You know, if you go beyond politics, the way the network gets ratings figures
>on entertainment shows is also open to suspicion.  Ever wondered why the trash
>shows get high ratings and are allowed to stay on the air while anything with
>a shred of intelligence gets canceled?  Then they try to convince us that we're
>supposed to like the gutter swill they're cranking out.  The ratings figures
>always seem to contradict public opinion about those shows.  The meda has
>elevated crap to high art.  Instead of just informing us and allowing us
>to make up our own minds (think for ourselves) they have taken it upon
>themselves to dictate to us what movies to see, what shows to watch, and
>what music to listen to, and who to vote for.  Is this a form of censorship??

This is a total bunch of bs.  Period.  Go watch PBS.

S. Graham
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
From: cdpert01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 20:33:28 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Nov10.171300.11448@netcom.com>, jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>
> John Switzer               | Impeach Clinton!
>                            | Support the coup!
                                           ~~~~
     Maybe you should be more specific; you support a "coup d'etat,"
but you do not support Clinton's "coup de grace" plan for America.    :-)

     C. Perttunen
From: mitch@lsil.com (Mitch Sako)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: These statistics don't lie. (unless u p
Date: 4 Nov 92 23:33:55 GMT
Reply-To: mitch@lsil.com
Organization: LSI Computing Systems

In article 11724@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu, sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Nov2.193659.20027@lsil.com>, mitch@lsil.com (Mitch Sako) write
>s:
>>|> In article 18977@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu, sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.e
>du (Susan E Schudt) writes:
>>|> >There has been much discussion these days about whether the
>>|> >rich got richer and the poor got poorer during the Reagan years.
>>|> >People have also claimed that Reagan RAISED taxes on lower incomes while
>>|> >decreasing taxes on higher incomes.
>>|>
>>|> Susan, these statistics do lie because they do not include the total tax
>>|> burden.  They don't even include social security.  When you include social
>>|> security, state, local, and excise taxes the statistics look pretty grim fo
>r
>>|> working stiffs.
>
>Thank you for enlightening me.  Now please tell me what 12 years of Reagan/Bush
>have to do with state, local and excise taxes.  The point was, and still is,
>that at the FEDERAL LEVEL, Reagan LOWERED rates for everyone, while at the same
>time generating MORE revenue.  I am sorry that I was not more specific but one
>would assume that statistics coming from the CBO take into account federal tax 
>rates.

You seem to need enlightening because you don't realize what Reagan/Bush
"federalism" (now a resounding affirmation from the people that it was a
failure) was all about.  You see, cutting federal support of many state
and local items (education, infrastructure, etc.) during the last 12 years
has created state and local budget problems in a magnitude never seen before.

The solution?  Raise state and local taxes.  State and local taxes are
regressive (fancy that!) and shift more of the burden to the poor and
middle class.

---
===============================================================================
Mitch Sako	LSI Computing Systems			Office	408-433-4187
internet:	msako@lsil.com				FAX	408-433-8796
uucp:		lsil!msako
RIME:		->REDBARON, conference=POLITICS
Disclaimer:	Opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone and do not
		reflect those of anyone else including my organization,
		my management or my mother
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 16:21:19 GMT
Subject: Re: Clinton wins in LANDSLIDE
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber) writes:

> 
>      Also of note in last evening's broadcasts:
> 
> o on (I believe) NBC, the Reverend Jackson was interviewed; he mentioned
>   that there is no longer a Russian threat...
> 
>   Think again, Rev!
> 
>   + Russian inflation rate is 1200 percent.
>   + Yeltsin is in disfavor with the masses for not bringing about economic
>     reform.
>   + Yeltsin ordered a competitor to disband his personal 5000 man army.
>   + Yeltsin stopped removal of troops from the baltic states, citing that
>     this was in both sides best interest.

This is all true.  I have never, even ONCE, understood why people
thought that the collapse of the Soviet system made the world
a lot safer.  It presented loads of new dangers while preserving
a good number of old ones in the hands of a less stable system.

> 
> 
> 
>    Things are going to get extremely interesting over there very soon.

They already are.  It seems the likelihood of totalitarian rule
there is pretty high, in my opinion.

>    The big question is:  will things explode before or after Clinton is
>   sworn in?  Don't forget that missiles are still trained on the U.S.

Probably after, and yes, they still have the nukes.

> 
> 
>    Be afraid.
> 
>    Be very afraid.
> 
>    The bear, though wounded, can still strike out.

Well, conservatives like to rail against liberal fear-mongering.
One should be quite concerned about this.  It is not clear that
being very afraid is strictly necessary.

> 
doug
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8032 alt.politics.clinton:16044 alt.politics.bush:13328
From: pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Family values
Date: 6 Nov 92 08:07:54 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Distribution: usa, world
Organization: University of California, San Diego

Clinton does not want to move to Washington until his daughter
Chelsea has finished her school semester. Talking about family
values.
Pim van Meurs
-- 
Pim van Meurs  UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Mail Code A-030  	 UUCP : ...!ucsd!ssurf.ucsd.edu!VANMEURS
UCSD La Jolla  CA 92093  ARPA : VANMEURS@ssurf.ucsd.edu
(619)-458 9729 Home	 Bitnet : VANMEURS%ssurf.ucsd.edu@sdsc
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: tom@uts.cc.wayne.edu (Thomas Richard Stevenson)
Subject: Re: Electoral Mandate?
Organization: Wayne State Univ.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 21:49:12 GMT

Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov> writes:

>In article <1992Nov5.163731.24598@uts.cc.wayne.edu> Thomas Richard
>Stevenson, tom@uts.cc.wayne.edu writes:
>>Freedom of speech is NEVER counterproductive, pointless, or divisive!

>I would defend the your right to say anything you want.
>However, my opinion of this discussion still holds. It is
>my right to state that opinion.

True both ways. 

>>And I disagree that we "have work to do ....!". I for one want the Gov.
>>out of my life as much as possible, and I don't see that with Clinton.

>Then go buy yourself a desert island. 

Where is it writen that you have to agree with your Gov. to love your 
country? Why should I leave??? Why can't I comment? I'm not trying to
stop anyone from commenting, please don't try to stop me, or suggest
"Love it or leave it".

>I, however, am concerned about
>problems that have been allowed to reach critical proportions by
>people with attitudes just like yours. 

We both agree there are problems. We disagree only in who we feel caused
the problems, and what the correct way of fixing it. Lets leave out the
personal attack.

>You
>can sit on your hands and ignore them if you want, but don't come
>crying to me when one of them bites you on your *ss.

I'm not sure what your point is? What do you mean my "one of them"? 
If you mean some Person who disagrees with me, why would I cry to you?
If you mean some Problem, again, why would I cry to you?
And why do you think I "sit on my hands"? I see nothing wrong, nor have 
I suggested that people should help out people in need. I just don't like
the Gov. taking my money to do it on my behalf. The Gov. is the many cause
of all problems. This is true for both the Rep. and the Dem. alike. I 
want both of them out of my pockets. 

I love my country, but I fear my Gov!
-- 
     ____  __   __       Tom@UTS.CC.Wayne.Edu
      /   /_/  /_        Thomas_Richard_Stevenson@MTS.CC.Wayne.Edu
     /.  /\ . __/.       Tom@CMS.CC.Wayne.Edu
                         UserTom@WayneMTS.Bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
From: costin@cs.mcgill.ca (Costin RIZAN)
Subject: Re: This is OUTRAGEOUS...
Organization: SOCS - McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:10:59 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.201653.20426@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>
>		November 11, 1992:
>   
>Bill Clinton (President-Elect) was at the Arkansas War 
>Veterans Memorial Service today.
>THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS. A DRAFT DODGER "honoring" war
>veterans with his presence? 
>  
>Okay, okay. Let's just put this in perspective. 
	Just because he didn't agree with the war it doesn't mean that
he doesn't respect and honor those that fought and died iin it.

	He's never demonstrated against the soldiers themselves to my
knowledge. Just against the politicians that sent those people to die
in a dubious war. 


Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8319 alt.irc:4049
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.irc
Subject: Re: ATTENTION!!!
Date: 10 Nov 92 20:26:21 GMT
Distribution: usa, na
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <1992Nov10.002342.22401@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>
>After weeks of painstaking construction and programming, we now have a
>channel on IRC (Internet Relay Chat) devoted to... you guessed it...
>DITTOHEADS.
>
>Go to the channel #Limbaugh and you will find the DittoBot, a new bot

>I will guarantee you that ruthless hecklers will be kicked and banned
>for the sake of our peace of mind.

Will you have the intellectual courage to allow people in who disagree?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 08:47:13 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.214907.8398@s1.gov>, lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) writes:
> 	I was only trying to have some fun at the expense of all the
> net.right-wingers.
> 
> 	I feel that I have succeeded in demonstrating that they have
> no sense of humor when someone eats _their_ sacred cows.

AWW HAW HAW HAW! Yup, yup. You got me 'dare! HAW HAW HAW! Gawd Dangit, how did
'ja ever do it? HAW HAW HAW!

 Really, you have a dizzying intellect in the art of the verbal snare.
Disclaimers. Disclaimers.
---------
Do you hear the people sing?
 Singing the song of Angry men?
It is the Music of a people who will not be slaves again!
----------
		Possible Republican Creed.
		Vince Goddard 
                Jack Kemp in '96
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8354 alt.rush-limbaugh:9421 alt.politics.bush:13733
From: marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: 11 Nov 1992 14:00:06 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Department MSCS
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: studsys.mscs.mu.edu

In article <1992Nov10.171300.11448@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>Man, I can't believe the complaints I'm getting with my sig - isn't it amazing
>that for 12 years, Democrats have been ridiculing Reagan, Bush, Quayle, and 
>anything conservative, yet when they are finally victorious they allow no 
>dissent whatever? I was going to change this sig after about a week or so, 
>John Switzer               | Impeach Clinton!
>                           | Support the coup!

John,

Your .sig points out what kind of a narrow-minded person you are.
And your summaries point out not only your single-minded devotion to
whatever Rush limbaugh says, but the fact you have no life.  Why?
What kind of life must you have that the best thing you can think 
to do with your time is type up 'summaries' of the Rush Limbaugh
show.


-- 
Marc Rassbach    marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu    If you take my advice, that
MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
   Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: nau@ssesco.com (William Nau)
Subject: Re: Network projections
Organization: SSESCO
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:50:41 GMT

>Plus something noone has mentioned is the FACT that ABC news on the evening
>newscast (before even the first poll closed) said (DIRECT QUOTE) "Since WE
>promiced not to predict results of the election until the polls close, we 
>will not do that, but, the winds of change are in the air."
>
>I immediately changed channels.  Face it the Networks (at least the three
>major ones) are A**HOLES who want to affect the election for their own
>benefit.

I can't remember which network it was, but one of them declared Clinton
a winner ONE MONTH before the election.  That pissed me off.  In general,
this year, I didn't watch any of the news on the election.  I just watched
the debates, interviews and Perot's charts.

-- 
William R. Nau
Supercomputer Systems Engineering and Services Company (SSESCO)
511 11th Avenue South, Suite 216
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1536
(612) 342-0003

nau@SSESCO.com
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8469 alt.politics.clinton:16975 alt.politics.bush:13826 alt.rush-limbaugh:9539