From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle is a hero
Organization: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:53:57 GMT

You know, a lot of us Quayle Quashers would be open to the possibility
that Our Boy has something to offer this country other than boffo
laughs, but it appears his supporters are unable to express themselves
in complete sentences.  This latest addition to the Right Wing Token
Ring has the usual signs of a Dandroid: bad spelling, bad punctuation,
bad grammar, and statements asserted without proof.

You'd be doing Danoe a bigger favor than you realize if you'd
learn to articulate your reasons for supporting him more clearly.
Of course, this is clearly impossible.  Clear thinking and logical
reasoning require the conclusion that the Danster is either a
mediocre fool or a dangerous loon.

Your own personal copy of the Quayle Quotes are on their way.
No charge.

v064mb7h@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Greg J Till) writes: >

>post and give my hero Dan Quayle some support.  This genious...and political
 Post what?  Sentence doesn't parse.                  genius, this political

>god if you will, gets nothing but criticism from the mass public and the 
                                                      public masses

>liberally controlled media.  Im here to say that I feel sorry for Dan Quayle,
 liberal-controlled.          I'm

>and dont think that he deserves half of the criticism that he gets.  The man
     don't

>is the greatest political mind in the White House, what he spells wrong in no
                                                  ;                wrongly 

>way reflects his political stature.  Until these sharks who harp on spelling
>can correctly spell every word in the dictionary I wish to hear no more.  And
>god forbid the guy has some oppinions on family values.  SHOOT ME  I too believe
                             opinions                     SHOOT ME!    margins 

>that a two parent household is necessary for a childs welfare.  Lets look at 
        two-parent                              child's          Let's

>Dan's record....He has never lost an election before this one.  This reflects  
>my firm belief that he did nothing but help the Bush campaign, And the Bush 
                                                                and

>campaign did nothing but hurt him.  I hope we see Dan back in full force in 96'
                                                                            '96;
>we need some conservatism guiding this country.

Logical errors:

Never having lost an election before has nothing to do with whether
he hurt the campaign.  Polls said he did.

Dan's election results are not all there is to his record.

Define conservatism.  Does Reagan qualify?  If so, he screwed up
our economy, so we don't need it.

You assert Quayle is a genius and a political god without any proof.

Why do you want us to shoot you?

-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc