From: snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass)
Subject: Re: Education Regarding Alternative Family Units (Re: The Analogy Betwixt Gays & Blacks (Re: Children in Same-gender Families))
Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 21:13:18 GMT

In article <1ht252INN4ng@hp-col.col.hp.com> smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:
>snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass) writes:
>> Why then did you bring up the teaching of beastiality in a classroom
>> when we were discussing teaching homosexuality......along with 
>> heterosexuality?  You brought beastiality into the conversation....why?
>> It looks like a tie into me......
>
>I was asking about other "...alities".   Which ones should be taught, 
>which ones should be left out. 


But as I was stating in my last posting, why did you bring it up?  We
were discussing the teaching of homosexuality  and heterosexuality 
in optional classes.  Then all of a suddenly you want to discuss
a topic way off in right field about humans having sex with animals....
I don't understand your jump of logic here?  Why are you so interested
in animal/human sex????

There is a group on bestiality on the net.....maybe you should look
into it, you seem to have the interest in that sort of topic matter
 and talking about bestiality really isn't part of this discussion...
Sorry.

>
>> We were talking about my coming to the aid of a person whose values
>> were different than mine....and you brought up seperation of Church and
>> state and for the second time, above I am replying that I didn't bring
>> that up...and that it was a different topic matter all together....
>
>Yes, you did not bring it up.  It was part of the discussion you had 
>joined halfway.  As part of the conversation, not neccesarity *at* 
>you, I was commenting on it.  If you find it irrelevent, feel free 
>to ignore it. 

I just replied to one of people discussing the issue of his and his
wife's right not to have their children taught things that go against
their values.....You were the one who replied to my particular posting,
a posting dealing with VALUES, and you introduced bestiality and seperation
of church and state into my reply....when I was talking about values and
protecting an individuale's right to their own personal values, and
you still after 5 postings have not once replied to my original posting....

Boy have we been everwhere on the road map with this one.  It is so fun
to see which way he is going to take us now!!!!  


>
>> Naw I havne't flamed yet....I for you my dear I won't flame.  It is fun
>> to have you twist things in public.....
>
>You have an odd sense of fun..if someone were trying to intentionally 
>twist what you say, you find that fun?  


I have already pointed out that you are doing that.....second posting  I 
believe....No it just entertains me to see you create a discussion with
me and not once discuss my original posting......It is like you
were waiting for a victim and then you got me and I am like
gristle, I just ain't that easy to manipulate....


>
>Walter
>
>(Such a productive conversation...)


It is working for me....I mean I have others around me watching this
converstation and we are just having a grand time with you!!!!

Bil Snodgrass III
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh