From: tvechins@eng.auburn.edu (Toni R. Vechinski)
Subject: HEY U FRISKY FELINES....WOOF!
Organization: Auburn University Engineering
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:02:58 GMT


In article <1992Aug31.190118.2325@odin.corp.sgi.com>, lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com 
(Lana Mountford) writes:

>In article <1992Aug27.203242.1@sscl.uwo.ca>, carl@sscl.uwo.ca (Carl Kaufmann)
>writes:
>|> The Shadowette has challenged me to prove that cats are indeed more romantic
>|> than dogs.  To that end I would appreciate any help you and our fellow
>|> net.felines could muster.  TIA

> Why, what could possibly be more romantic than a soft purr in your lap?
> What is more romantic than the feel of *soft* fur against your cheek, or
> the sight of a sleek animal stretching languidly in a pool of sunlight?
> What about a soft nuzzle under the chin, with a corresponding "chirp" to
> let you know that you are indeed appreciated?  What more proof is needed?


Hmmmmmmmm,  well, you have certainly gotten my attention.........


In article <1992Sep2.181452.355@rick.dgbt.doc.ca>, chrisc@cebra.dgbt.doc.ca 
(Chris Camfield) writes:

> Doesn't it depend on the cat?  My cat is a wonderful, beautiful animal
> who also an absolute beast!  The only time he'll rub up against your
> legs is when he wants you to feed him.  (And if that doesn't work, he
> nips, claws, and eventually bites...)  You can barely hear him purr,
> when he does!  (Have to check under the chin to see!)


Hmmmmmmmm, well, he does have a point..........


In article <1992Aug29.232221.1@sscl.uwo.ca>, carl@sscl.uwo.ca (Carl Kaufmann)
writes:

> Let me stretch out in front of a warm romantic fire and I'm sure that all
> your doubts will fade like the echo of my purr.


Hmmmmmmmmm, you _definitely_ have my attention again........

Of course, Ima Mutt has been quoted in the 'New York Times':

      "They are much better then 'Cats', I'd pet them again, and again
       and again........"  :)
 
Ok, all my fine, frisky felines (and anybody else for that matter), I think it
is time for you to bring out your heavy artillery and really PROVE to ME that
you kinky kittens are more amorous.  i.e.  Leave me spellbound  =)


In article <1992Aug28.120728.29377@mlb.semi.harris.com>, smccoy@dw3g.ess.harris.
com (Scott McCoy) writes:

> More than glad to help, but I *do* have a question...are there any
> net.canines out there?  Cause if there ain't, then maybe we win by
> default????  :-)

In response to that, my cuddly Cheshire Cat.....

Because no evidence has yet been found to prove the contrary, doesn't necessarily
mean I will automatically accept by default that cats are the more romantic. 
=)

However, seeing as to how you are the Official Back Scratcher of the RFA.....I
*could* be persuaded. 8^)  I dare you to make me purr! ;)

 
(The Shadowette turns around and walks off as her shoulders shake with mirth...
 ....the fog surrounds her and she disappears into the night making them wonder
 if she was ever there at all......)


             ......Mueheeheeheeheeeeee...................

                         .........The Shadowette...................


*~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~*
*                                                ^                           *
*   Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point.                   *
*                                                                            *
*   The Heart has its reasons that reason knows nothing of.                  *
*                                                                            *
*~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~*
Newsgroups: alt.romance.chat