HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sharris@chopin.udel.edu (Scott A Harris)
Subject: Re: Sony 1302 (not 1320) monitor for sale
Organization: University of Delaware
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:34:48 GMT



Thanks to Lon Amerman for pointing out to me that the Sony 1302
will *NOT* work with the lcs.  However, it does work on all mac
IIs.  I am using one right now on my ci and it looks fine.
I lieu of this I am dropping the price of the monitor to $400.
That includes the monitor, the stand, the cable for a mac
and the full warranty.  You pay shipping.
I also have one cable for an IBM system, standard 15 pin SVGA.
Sorry for any confusion.

Scott



In article <C182ML.KCC@news.udel.edu> sharris@chopin.udel.edu (Scott A Harris) writes:
>
>By an ordering freak of nature I have been given the Sony 1302 monitor
>instead of the 1320 I ordered.  That's 1302, not 1320.  The specs on
>these monitors are as follows:
>SVGA
>1024x768
>14"
>.25mm dot pitch
>Interlaced
> 
>These monitors will come with the appropriate cable for your system
>(if your system is a mac) and the stand.  Full warranty from the 
>manufacture will also be included.  Will work with
>most macs (not the classics) and most IBMs and compatibles.
>The retail price is $995, I have seen them in most mail order
>catalogs for $499, I need to get rid of them soooo I'm asking $450.
>You pay shipping.  
> 
>Scott
>sharris@chopin.udel.edu
>-- 
>Scott Harris
>sharris@chopin.udel.edu


-- 
Scott Harris
sharris@chopin.udel.edu
From: westes@smurf.sti.com (Will Estes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Want Info On Siemens and UMC Chipsets for local bus '486 boards
Date: 27 Jan 1993 17:18:25 -0800
Organization: Mail Group
NNTP-Posting-Host: smurf.sti.com

Has anyone had luck with '486DX and '486DLC VESA local bus motherboards running
the Siemens or UMC chipsets?  The Siemens seems to be used primarily
on motherboards with the Cyrix chipset.  We need to run these boards
with Windows, Windows/NT, and UNIX.

-- 
Will Estes		Internet: westes@netcom.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Using Atari Joysticks on PC
From: djlewis@ualr.edu
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:06:00 GMT
Organization: University of Arkansas at Little Rock

In article <1993Jan24.203344.4337@vax.cns.muskingum.edu>, ke_kimmell@vax.cns.muskingum.edu (DER KOENIG VON KIMMELL) writes:
> In article <blumenow.4@underdog.ee.wits.ac.za>, blumenow@underdog.ee.wits.ac.za (Warren Blumenow) writes:
>> I have heard that it is possible (with the correct driver software) to use an
>> Atari-type (microswitch) joystick on the IBM PC. I don't know where or how 
>> it would be connected. If anyone has heard of, or better still, has used 
>> something of this nature, or if you have the drivers, etc., please E-mail:
>> blumenow@underdog.ee.wits.ac.za
>> 
>     I remember seeing a game in a Software store in Akron Ohio that had a
> device that plugged into your printer (parallel) port and allowed an old Atari
> Joystick to be controlled via the device.
> 
> Kevin
I ran across an old computer shopper article regarding converting the ATARI
joystick to IBM ready. But for the cost of a new IBM joystick I don't feel it
would be worth it.
	I will gather the info and post it if there is interest.
Don Lewis
<djlewis@ualr.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Help needed to setup two monitors.
From: aman@futon.SFSU.EDU (Aman Khalili)
Date: 22 Jan 93 13:29:24 PST
Organization: San Francisco State University

I have a 386/20.  I have a mono text graphic gard. 
I wanted to add a VGA card and monitor to the system.
I know it is possible. But which VGA card will work?
Can I run windows in VGA and Borland C++ turbo Debugge
in the mono.

Any information that can help is welcomed.

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: waw5805@ultb.isc.rit.edu (W.A. Willis)
Subject: Connecting a bus mouse to a keyboard bus port...
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 02:45:10 GMT

Is this possible? I have a Tandy laptop that has 1 serial, one parallel,
and one keyboard bus port. The Logitec bus mouse that I'm trying to hook
up is not recognized by any of the Windows mouse drivers. Has anybody done this? 
		Thanks in Advance
From: wang@wintermute.fullerton.edu (wang)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: What am I getting myself into? (Hard drive question)
Date: 26 Jan 1993 00:13:13 -0800
Organization: California State University at Fullerton
NNTP-Posting-Host: wintermute.fullerton.edu

I have a hard drive from a friend who has accidentally
plugged the DC connector BACKWARDS. Undoubtedly, it is
now non-functioning. My question is: is it possible to
fix such a drive? If so, how involved would it be?  My
assumption is that there should be some protective
circuits on the drive which prevents a reverse current
to pass to the other components. If so, I may just have
to replace a couple of diodes. Could it be that simple?

The drive is a Seagate ST-251-1.

Peter
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: dbeeman@dogstar.Colorado.edu (Dave Beeman)
Subject: Re: DEATH to floppies!!!!!!
Reply-To: dbeeman@dogstar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:05:31 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.195810.8919@ico.isc.com>, timhu@ico.isc.com (Timothy Hu) writes:
|> In article <1993Jan27.063559.71696@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> ry01@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ROBERT YUNG) writes:
|> >I've had it! I'm always getting bad sectors on my 1.44 disk! They format fine,
|> >but when I put stuff on them, I'm screwed! I've tried name brand disks and even
|> >they can go BAD! IS there an alternative?
|> 
|> I haven't had a bad floppy in over three years. I suspect that something
|> is wrong with your drive. When was the last time you cleaned it?

I've seen a couple of cases like this where the problem was a bad controller
card.  You might see if you can find someone who will let you swap drives
and controllers as an experiment before you blame one or the other.

Dave Beeman
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: cajun@sound.demon.co.uk (David Mackay)
Subject: AST RAMPAGE Card HELP Please!
Reply-To: cajun@sound.demon.co.uk
Distribution: world
X-Mailer: cppnews $Revision: 1.20 $
Organization: Sound & Vision BBS (UK) 0932 252323
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 07:07:40 +0000

        +--------------------------------------+
       +    Internet cajun@sound.demon.co.uk    +
      +  Amprnet - g4hjg.ampr.org 44.131.19.240  +
       +     David Mackay - G4HJG  @  GB3XP     +
        +--------------------------------------+
AST RAMPAGE CARD......could someone please help with info on this card
fitted to an ?old? IBM AT-286/8MHz machine. Settings for dipswitches and
any info on s'ware drivers needed etc. Thanks

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: dbeeman@dogstar.Colorado.edu (Dave Beeman)
Subject: Re: Diamond Speedstar 24X: Is it edible or poison?
Reply-To: dbeeman@dogstar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:57:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan28.180801.18321@lucid.com>, lnz@lucid.com (Leonard N. Zubkoff) writes:
 (regarding use of Diamond cards with unix and Xfree386)
|> 
|> Is this really a problem, if the underlying chip documentation is available?
|> The new Diamond Viper card is based on the Weitek P9000 chip, and Weitek was
|> quite happy to send me their documentation.  As far as I know, the drivers for
|> the Viper Card (or at least the P9000 anyway) are produced by Weitek, and I
|> don't know if Diamond provides anything special of their own.  Apparently there
|> are a number of P9000 based cards in the pipeline, so is there any reason to
|> believe they each require specialized drivers?
|> 

The problem seems to be that Diamond uses a proprietary programmable clock
circuit in their cards and isn't releasing the programming information.  My
impression is that this is independent of what accelerator chip they use.
You can proabably get a more informed answer by following the discussions
which have appeared in comp.os.linux and comp.windows.x.i386unix.  Before
buying a graphics accelerator for use with unix/X, it would be a good idea
to get the current list of cards and chipsets for which there are Xfree386
drivers.

Dave Beeman
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: h9117228@hkuxa.hku.hk (Li)
Subject: Re: Just upgraded 386DXL-40 to 486DX2-50 CPU
Organization: The University of Hong Kong
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:47:09 GMT

In article <C15puJ.1DI@sci.kun.nl> pieterh@sci.kun.nl (Peter Herweijer) writes:
>In <1jj1frINNho0@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ab245@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Sam Latonia) writes:
>
>>I just upgraded my cpu tonight from the AMD386DXL-40 to the INTEL
>>486DX2-50 cpu. I notice that it takes 40 seconds now from the time
>>that I flip the power switch on, on the computer to the opening
>>screen of my Menu Direct program. (I don't run Windows or OS2)
>>It used to take only 25 seconds with the old 386DXL-40. Can anyone
>>explain why the new 486 cpu after all is set on the mother board
>>for the new cpu takes 15 seconds longer to run the CMOS than it
>>did before the upgrade?????
>
>Hmm... BIOS ROM code takes longer to execute...
>
>>the video test went down from 386=6510 chr/ms
>>to 4028 chr/ms this is in the turbo mode using the LandMark V2.0???
>>It did go up on the normel mode from the 3191 chr/ms (386 cpu) to
>>the same rate of 4028 chr/ms as I have in the turbo mode, why?
>
>video code slows down, (practically) independent of CPU speed...
>
>You apparently have a memory interface problem. Tell me: have
>you accidentally disabled ROM shadowing?  Weird wait state
>settings? Are _both_ caches enabled (probably for the 386 the
>'internal cache' entry was set 'disabled')?
>
>Peter Herweijer
>pieterh@sci.kun.nl

The slowdowns are probably due to a change in the system clock (40MHz
for the 386 to 25MHz for the 486DX2).  The boot-up (a lot of disk
accesses) and video speed are dependent on the ISA bus speed.  I'd bet
his bus speed is set at 1/5 ACLK (8MHz for a 40MHz system clock, but
5MHz now for 25MHz system clock).  Changing it to 1/3 ACLK should fix
it.
From: v075pcah@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Dinesh K. Sukumaran)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: suggestions needed for setting up a DOS/Windows network
Date: 26 Jan 93 22:38:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


Hi,

We are in the process of upgrading and setting up
a computer lab for students. We already have 2 386s, 4 286s and
a 386DX. We want to spend the least amount of money, and use 
our current computer equipment also. Our lab should be able to
support computer intensive software like mathematica, hyperchem
etc.. So we thought of two alternatives:

1. get a 486/50 and keep these computer intensive software on
them. The down side is, only one person can work at a time.

Or

2. set up a Server-Client network: setup a 486/50 with a large
disk and printer as server, and use our current 386/286 
machines as clients. The idea is that all computations will be
done on the server, and the clients will merely serve as
front-ends. Also, the clients can be used independently for small
tasks. Is possible in the DOS/Windows  environment? I have been
told that unix machines can do this... But, is it possible
for DOS/WINDOWS set up too? 

If option 2 is possible, we would prefer that. Our assumption is
386/286 machines can be used as dumb terminals, hanging off the
486. The 486 will be responsible for computations, disk access,
video updates, printing etc...

I  would appreciate any advice/comment/suggestions on this. Also,
if option 2 above is possible, what do we need? Who will be the 
suggested vendors? Will one  copy on the server be able to serve
requests from multiple clients?

Once again please let me know of suggestions for this setup.

Thanks,

--Dinesh

   --------------------------------------------------------------
   Dinesh K. Sukumaran    Tel:   (716)-829-3147
   Dept. of Chemistry     Fax:   (716)-829-2960
   9 Acheson Hall         email: chedinsh@ubvmsc.cc.buffalo.edu
   SUNY at Buffalo               dinesh@hohaha.chem.buffalo.edu
   Buffalo, NY 14214             v075pcah@ubvmsc.bitnet
   _____________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: sppp@hippo.ru.ac.za (Prof P Piacenza)
Subject: Micro Tech Resources
Summary: Address request
Keywords: PC Microscope
Organization: Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 09:00:51 GMT








I need to contact MICRO TECH RESOURCES, the distributors of
PC MICROSCOPE.

I tried the following address: 122 East Pittsburgh St, 
Greensburg, PA 15601-9926

but my letter was returned as 'not deliverable as addressed, 
unable to forward'.

Can anyone help with a new address?

Please email to chpp@unitrix.utr.ac.za

Thank you.


-- 
	 L.Piacenza - Chemistry Department - University of Transkei
	 Internet: sppp@hippo.ru.ac.za  Tel. 27-471-3022384
	 Internet: chpp@unitrix.utr.ac.za  (preferred).
From: 01tethomas@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Keyboard Connection IBM<->MAC
Date: 27 Jan 93 16:23:16 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

Keyboard Connections


I am looking to see if someone could tell me if it is possible is connect a
IBM keyboard to the ADB port of a Macintosh. I have the standard pin
configuration for the ADB port. I need the pin configuration for the IBM
keyboards. Any information would be useful.


Thank you,

Trenton Thomas

Ball State University
Entrepreneurship Major #3
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system
From: ajb8886@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Subject: Re: PICTURE OFF CENTER IN SVGA MODE
Reply-To: ajb8886@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 17:03:38 GMT

In article <gay.727728209@sfu.ca>, gay@selkirk.sfu.ca (Ian D. Gay) writes:
>reaper@wixer.cactus.org (Keath Milligan) writes:
>
>>The off-center thing is quite normal and there isn't much you can do about
>>it other than adjust your monitor every time you switch modes or get a
>>really expensive monitor that has processors to do it automatically (the
>>Mitsubishi Diamond Scan does this I think, but it runs about 2 grand <choke>).
>
>There must be different models, then, I recently bought one for $C400. 
>I like it, and yes, it does handle centering correctly, at least going 
>between 640x480 and 800x600. My card doesn't do 1024x768.


Some of the newer microprocessor controlled monitors have autocentering
and autosizing.

But an interesting bit that many people seem to overlook is that with
cards like the Diamond Speedstar line, or the ATI Ultra line, the setup
program that configures the appropriate scan rates for each monitor resolution
ALSO has the option to reposition the image manually (from the controller's
perspective that is).

In other words, you can set up the image timing for each mode in such a way
that the video image is always centered perfectly.  With the ATI Ultra line,
these settings are saved on EEPROM.  With Diamond you have to put the VMODE
TSR in your autoexec (but it's tiny, and doesn't take up much memory at all).

Alex


Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: choudhry@wam.umd.edu (Zafar Ullah Choudhry)
Subject: IBM 8513 VGA montor shows only a horizontal line on screen....Help...
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:42:36 GMT

Hi... I have an IBM 8513 color monitor. The monitor shows only a     
horizontal line on the screen whenever powered up. The line is very
bright and it looks like that its vertical deflection circuit has gone
bad. 

I don't know where to start from even if it is virtical deflection circuit.
If anyone can help me in fixing this problem, I'll appreciate that.


Thanks.
Zafar.
email: choudhry@wam.umd.edu

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: wiegand@rtsg.mot.com (Robert Wiegand)
Subject: Re: Using slower-than-spec RAM
Reply-To: motcid!wiegand@uunet.uu.net
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:10:19 GMT

thamilto@fnugget.intel.com (Tony Hamilton) writes:

>HI. Just bought a 486-33DX machine. For reference, it's an Intel _computer_...
>I work at Intel and bought one on an employee offer. Anyway, it came with
>4MB installed, in a 32-pin SIMM or something like that (I'm new to memory).

>The system also comes with 2 banks of 4 9-pin SIMM sockets, for either 1x9
>or 4x9 SIMMs (I still hope I'm getting these pin numbers right. It's the best
>I can remember - I don't have my manual with me). Well, anyway, the manual
>stated that you can mix and match SIMM types, as long as each bank of 4 has
>all the same, and is either all full or all empty. In addition, you can pop
>in an 8MB SIMM apparently in place of the 4MB one. Anyway... the manual
>suggests 80ns RAM, or faster. Because it was available and _very_ cheap, I
>popped in 100ns 1x9's in all 8 extra sockets, giving me 12MB total. Everything
>works fine, and I can verify the RAM is working for my applications which
>can use it.

>My question is: every tech person I talk to says not to do this, but they
>can't explain the reasoning behind that caution. I've heard it may have
>something to do with the bus and addressing, but I don't see any problems with
>the integrity of the memory. Should I be able to get away with this, or is
>there still a need for concern?

Yes there is reason for concern. While your system seems to run OK
you could get occasional random memory errors. Your system could
crash at any time without warning.

The memory access speed is the time it takes from when the processor
puts the memory address out to when the memory parts to put out the data.
You processor will wait 80ns from when it puts out the address to read
the data lines. But the memory parts could take up to 100ns to get
the data out. So its possible that when the processor reads the data
lines the memories haven't put their data out yet. The processor then
will use whatever random data was on the data bus and your program
gets messed up.

I would suggest removing the slow memory, you are just asking for trouble.

valid data
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Wiegand - Motorola Inc.
motcid!wiegand@uunet.uu.net            uunet!motcid!wiegand
Disclamer: I didn't do it - I was somewhere else at the time.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard,news.groups
From: wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith)
Subject: Re: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Organization: The John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 18:02:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.150446.10985@nmsu.edu> bgrubb@dante.nmsu.edu (GRUBB) writes:
>>  I don't think the term "pc" is too confusing.  Everyone has been using  
>>  that term for years to refer to DOS/Intel based systems.  IBM has very
>>  little to do with it anymore.  The term "pc" is probably less confusing
>>  to most people than any other term.                                    
>I disagree.  A resent article in BYTE said 'in choosing a PC (Mac or IBM)
>one must be sure of what is expected of the machine.'

Since there are no clones of Apple computers, the term "Mac" is much more
likely to be used when referring to Apple computers than the term "pc".

If someone is deciding which news group to read, they have already decided
wheather or not it's a "Mac" based group or a "Pc/MS-DOS/x86/ibm-pc" group.
Does "pc" appear in the name of any current Mac based groups?

>Also the PowerPC is
>a PC but it neither a DOS or an intel machine {Its a Mac/IBM UNIX/Motorola
>machine.}

I think the point of the current ibm-pc.hardware group is mostly for
HARDWARE discussions.  If the PowerPC comes out it should have it's own
group (why not call it comp.sys.powerpc ?).  That group probably won't
need to be subdivided because it will be a proprietary design and there
won't be a lot of 3'rd party hardware available for it like ther is for
the current ISA/EISA/VESA/x86 systems.


  The PowerPC {IBM's may be out THIS year} will produced by each
>company to fit the old expandsions.  I.e the IBM 601 will likely have support
>for HD interfaces like IDE and ESDI and BUS interfaces like ISA, MCA, EISA, 
>VESA, and PCI and SCSI-1 while the Apple 601 will support PDS, NuBUS, SCSI-1,
>and SCSI-2 conections.  The term PC has brodened over the years to the point
>it is NO LONGER a synimem(sp) for IBM-PC.
>What I would like to see:
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.advocacy-equivalent of comp.sys.mac.advocacy
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.bus-discuse bus expandsions
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.drives
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.powerpc
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.sound
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.video
>comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Why .ibm.pc.* ???
Is there .apple.pc or .mac.pc right now ???
Since the PowerPC is based on a different processor than the x86 line,
it should have it's own hierarchy (when or if it ever comes out).

I can't see how IBM or Apple will let the PowerPC use ISA or EISA.  IBM's
strategy on new computer lines seems to be proprietary proprietary
proprietary.  The only link the PowerPC might have with the current pc
is the bus, and it's by no means clear wheather or not it will be bus-
compatible.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: swong@envmsa.eas.asu.edu (Wong, Shan Yung)
Subject: Wanted: Program that enables extended setup on AMI BIOS machine
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:48:00 GMT

Hi everyone,

  I have a computer with AMI BIOS but I can't access the extended CMOS
setup without the proper program (but I can press <DEL> at startup time to
access the standard CMOS setup).  Anyone has any idea where I can get such
program?

Thanks in advance.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: dbeeman@dogstar.Colorado.edu (Dave Beeman)
Subject: Re: Diamond Speedstar 24X: Is it edible or poison?
Reply-To: dbeeman@dogstar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:26:31 GMT

In article <csjohn.728234175@watson.mtsu.edu>, csjohn@watson.mtsu.edu (John Wallace) writes:
|> What do you think of the Diamond Speedstar 24X?
|> Is it a good card for DOS, Windows, OS/2, and/or Unix?
|> 

If you plan to use Linux or 386BSD with Xfree386 (the free X-windows
package) you will have a hard time getting drivers for any Diamond products,
as they use proprietary code which isn't available to the developers of
Xfree386.  You will get better performance at a comparable price from one of
the cards based on the new S3 86c801 chip, like the Actix GraphicsEngine
32.  My Actix card is blazingly fast with Windows and DOS and the benchmarks
I've seen for unix/X are comparable to a SUN Sparc II.

Dave Beeman
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: wood@havedash.aer.loral.com (Bill Wood)
Subject: 1/4" tape drives?
Organization: Loral
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:27:45 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
X-Posted-From: havedash.aer.loral.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

   Does anyone know if it is possible to connect a 1/4" tape drive
(150Mb QIC-150 DC-6150 tapes) to an ISA 486 system?  These are the
larger tapes, not the small DC-2xxx tapes.  Specifically, 
I would like to be able to read tar tapes from a Sun SPARCstation
on a PC.

   Any help in locating vendors which sell the tapes, controllers and/or
software necessary would be most appreciated.

   Please respond by e-mail so I don't miss your response in this high-volume
newsgroup.

Thanks,

Bill Wood
wood@havedash.aer.loral.com
From: naiming@eng.umd.edu (Naiming Shen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Looking for a speech synthesizer board with 'C' library
Date: 28 Jan 1993 15:24:51 GMT
Organization: Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland
NNTP-Posting-Host: bagend.eng.umd.edu


I'm looking for a speech synthesizer board for IBM/PC/AT machine.
I what to transfer ascii English into prononced words on a speaker.
Further more I would like to have a 'C' library goes with it. Any info
on this will be appreciated.

Naiming Shen