HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: smm@rodan.UU.NET (Steve Mansfield)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Date: 12 Dec 1992 19:24:13 -0500
Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA
NNTP-Posting-Host: rodan.uu.net
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this

In article <1992Dec11.234021.9293@Princeton.EDU> hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan) writes:
>
>Joe who ?
>
>:-) 

This is the 4th copy of your posting I've seen.  Either fix your poster, or
learn how to post.  Plus - learn how to edit out extra lines....

On a lighter note - Joe Nebraska, or somesuch.  Some has been...

Steve Mansfield                   Junior AlterNet Engineer 
smm@uunet.uu.net                  uunet!smm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: STEELERS, BILLS WILL GO 11-5 AND NOT WIN THE SUPER BOWL!!!
From: Robbie Po <RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 16:20:32 EST
Organization: Penn State University

Well, it's 21-3 Bears in the 4th quarter, and I'm convinced that the NFC is
clearly supererior now.  The AFC really sucks.  So does Bubby "I can't complete
 a pass" Brister - my grandma's bingo team could probably do better.  The
Steelers will be lucky to win one more game with him.
    Still, the Steelers will clinch the division today since Green Bay (NFC)
will beat Houston (AFC).  Unfortunately, all the Buffalo fans will begin
yapping again since the Bills have regained their home field advantage and keep
 it.  Steelers will lose to Minnesota next week - Bills will lose to the Saints
next week.  Then both teams will finish out with a win and go 11-5.  One might
be lucky to get to the Superbowl, where they will then be outplayed by the
49ers, Cowboys, Saints, Vikings, Eagles, Redskins, Packers, whoever.  Why even
play the Superbowl?  Just give it to the team that wins the NFC championship.
   I'm thoroughly conviced that without O'Donnell - Brister and the entire
AFC really sucks!!!!  Go Packers!!!
 ** Rob **
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: Re: THE FOOTBALL GODS HAVE SPOKEN!!!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 04:16:53 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.005910.2508@Princeton.EDU> Frank Bilotti <frank@wanda.princeton.edu> writes:
>
> [ Major whining deleted from ONE WHINING CowBoy fan....]
>
>Three points need to be made:

Yes, the score: Dallas 17  Redskins  20 :-)

>
>from the ultimate whining, wimpy pussy of them all that shows me that
>people cannot deal with the success of the 'Boys.  We will prevail and
>JPG will eat his own shit until preseason next year.
>
Frank, why don't you go with the tradition of real Texans and take
it like a MAN. Your Cowboys success is not complete unless they
can go all the way. Looks like YOU and YOUR team have a ways to
go. SO stop your whining and put your chin up and suck it up
like a MAN. What is this "we will prevail" shit? Man, you don't
know what it is to win unless you go back 14 years back. 'nuff
said.

-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
  is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The Play of the Day (Skins/Dallas)
Keywords: Lucky Break! Aikman
Date: 14 Dec 92 23:03:02 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania



How about the BET IV: we all bet that JPG can't stop gloating over the Niners
having gained home field advantage and the Cowboys sucking.  If we win, he
can't post for the rest of the season?? :-) :-)


satish nair
bitter & twisted giants fan
From: jdhl@troi.cc.rochester.edu (papa_sm00sh)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Physics 101 (was Re: Aikman admits to fumble?)
Date: 15 Dec 92 17:23:57 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York



from the lack of a convincing camera angle to show otherwise... it
appeared he was throwing the ball when someone hit his hand/arm... in
physics terms... the momentum of a defensive lineman vs. the momentum
of aikman's arm clearly results in the ball going in the direction of
the defensive lineman... backwards...


jason
From: mingos@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Super Bowl - Oilers and Eagles!
Date: 11 Dec 92 13:29:30 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620

In article <RLAG10-091292174740@222.14.80.23>, RLAG10@email.sps.mot.com (Gary Gavlick) writes:
> In article <HTM93CK@netmbx.netmbx.de>, rickk@netmbx.netmbx.de (Rick
> Kuhlbars) wrote:
>> 
>> In article <1992Dec7.193719.1257@neocad.com> bill@neocad.com (Bill Bentley) writes:
>> >>why not?
>> >
>> >Because history has shown that it is very difficult for wild card teams
>> >to get to the Super Bowl. Thats why.
>> >
>> >Bill B.
>> 
>> That's true.  I believe that the Raiders were the only WC team to win
>> the SB.  Don't ask me what year (anybody know?) but I do know that
>> Plunkett was the QB at the time.
>> 
>> But there's always hope.  GO OILERS!!
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Der ricker k.
> 
>   In 1980 the Oakland Raiders went to the Superbowl as a wildcard team and
> beat Philadelphia in the 1981 Superbowl.  As Oiler fans from that time may
> remember the first team that Oakland beat was Houston (who had Stabler as
> QB). Coach "Bum" Phillips was fired after the 1980 season.
> 
 Din't the Raiders do it again in the 1983 season when they beat the
Redskins. I'm sure that they were a wild-card team then.

Paul
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber)
Subject: Re: all SB winner
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:54:05 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.000912.26492@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, vrao@nyx.cs.du.edu (Vinay Rao) writes:
> In article <BzBAAH.IIw@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
> >In regard to the SuperBowl winners who won the first time
> >and then did not lose after that.
> >
> 
> Didn't Washington win Superbowl 17 against Miami and then lose to the
> Raiders in Superbowl 18?  This may be an exception to a still interesting
> statistic.
> 
> 
> --
> **********************************************
> Vinay J. Rao                vrao@nyx.cs.du.edu
> **********************************************
> 

Washingon first LOST in Supe VII to the undefeated Miami Dolphins, 14-7.
Theory still stands.

HO HO FRAGGIN' HO!
Kevin L. Stamber
Purdue University

COWHER POWER!
From: ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Barry Foster, rushing records
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:47:57 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Dec16.131046.18605@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> john@ice.stx.com writes:
>In article <b2Y103q8c3pY00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend) writes:
>}}>In perspective, Barry Foster has a chance to break the record but would 
>}>have to put together some monster 200+ yard performances.  However, anything
>}>over 1800 yards would put him in an elite club with Jim Brown, O.J Simpson,
>}>Walter Payton, Earl Campbell, and Eric Dickerson.
>}
>}Foster does not belong in this club. Nor will he get there this year. 
>}
>}Emmitt, Barry S. .. perhaps... Foster... No... No... and No again! 
>}
>
>Excuse me but the club membership is gaining 1800 yards per 1 NFL
>season and if Foster does it then he deserves to be there.  I'd like to
>see you run for even one yard in the NFL (in the right direction).  Keep
>your Goddamn opinions to yourself.

Don't be silly, of course I could run for yardage in the NFL. Of course at 
5'7" 165 pounds I would not last very long doing so and in all likelihood 
would get moved to WR before I ever took a handoff in an NFL training camp.
At least that's what happened when I showed up at a USFL training camp. I 
looked good, ran a few sub-4.4 40's caught the ball well and was told, 
"don't call us we'll call you" I knew then it was time to get serious about 
this career in computers as I would obviously never get a fair shot to play
with the big boyz. If only I'd been born a couple of years later when the 
"smurf" receiver came in vogue I might be out there playing with these guys
now instead listening to your bullshit! 
	If given some of the holes Foster has had to run through I dare 
say I'd have close to 1000 yards too, assuming my 32 year old body didn't 
all apart by now. The guy is having a great year .. but in my opinion... 
WHICH I WILL SHARE WHEN I DAMN WELL PLEASE.. he has not earned the right 
to be mentioned in the same sentence as Brown, Campbell, Dickerson, Payton 
and Simpson.. Period. Show me a couple more years at this performance 
level then we can talk... till then.. you and Barry F... can fuck off! 


-- 
Ronnie
-------------------------------------------------------------
Whenever the fates hear someone say, "It can't get any worse than this..." 
They just laugh and double your misery! 


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lhsux@swingset.bae.bellcore.com (Lorne Schachter)
Subject: Re: all SB winner
Organization: Bell Communications Research
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 15:47:55 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.155048@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>, death@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Markus Kalb) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> XXVI	26.1.92	 Washington	- Buffalo	37:24	Minneapolis 63.130
|> XXV	27.1.91	 N.Y. Giants	- Buffalo	20:19	Tampa	    73.813
|> XXIV	28.1.90  San Francisco  - Denver	55:10	New Orleans 72.919
|> XXIII	22.1.89	 San Francisco  - Cincinnati	20:16	Miami	    75.129
|> XXII	31.1.88  Washington	- Denver	42:10	San Diego   73.302
|> XXI	25.1.87  N.Y. Giants	- Denver	39:20	Pasadena   101.063
|> XX	26.1.86  Chicago	- New England	46:10	New Orleans 73.818
|> XIX	20.1.85	 San Francisco 	- Miami		38:16	Stanford    84.059
|> XVIII	22.1.84	 L.A. Raiders	- Washington	38: 9	Tampa	    72.920
|> XVII	30.1.83	 Washington	- Miami		27:17	Pasadena   103.667
|> XVI	24.1.82  San Francisco	- Cincinnati	26:21	Pontiac	    81.270
|> XV	25.1.81	 Oakland	- Philadelphia	27:10	New Orleans 76.135
|> XIV	20.1.80	 Pittsburgh	- Los Angeles	31:19	Pasadena   103.985
|> XIII	21.1.79  Pittsburgh	- Dallas	35:31	Miami	    79.484
|> XII	15.1.78	 Dallas		- Denver	27:10	New Orleans 75.583
|> XI	 9.1.77	 Oakland	- Minnesota	32:14	Pasadena   103.438
|> X	18.1.76	 Pittsburgh	- Dallas	21:17	Miami	    80.187
|> IX	12.1.75	 Pittsburgh	- Minnesota	16: 6	New Orleans 80.997
|> VIII	13.1.74	 Miami		- Minnesota	24: 7	Houston     71.882
|> VII	14.1.73  Miami		- Washington	14: 7   Los Angeles 90.182
|> VI 	16.1.72	 Dallas		- Miami		24: 3	New Orleans 81.023
|> V	17.1.71  Baltimore	- Dallas	16:13	Miami	    79.204
|> IV	11.1.70	 Kansas City	- Minnesota	23: 7	New Orleans 80.562
|> III	12.1.69	 N.Y. Jets	- Baltimore	16: 7	Miami	    75.389
|> II	14.1.68  Green Bay	- Oakland	33:14	Miami	    75.546
|> I	15.1.67	 Green Bay	- Kansas City 	35:10	Los Angeles 61.946
|> 
|> 
|> 	Bye Markus (death/NHawk)
|> 
|> 	e-mail : death@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
There's an interesting statistic that I noticed when the Giants went to
the Super Bowl for the second time:

	Any team that won its first Super Bowl appearance has never
	lost a Super Bowl:

		Green Bay	(2-0)
		NY Jets		(1-0)
		Pittsburgh	(4-0)
		San Francisco	(4-0)
		Chicago		(1-0)
		NY Giants	(2-0)

This accounts for 14 of the 25 (at the time, 26 now) Super Bowls.  I don't
know what it means, but it seems interesting.

					Lorne Schachter
From: jwc@netxcom.netx.com (Jeff Comer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dream TEAM
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:10:14 GMT
Organization: The Chaos Bobs

tswilliams@gallua.gallaudet.edu writes:
>Lets play FANASTY football... You are the coach and you have to pick:
>1-QB
>2-HBs
>3-receivers
>1-Defense team
>1-Kicker
>
>Who will you pick to help your team look good??

	AFC		NFC
QB	Dan Marino	Steve Young or Troy Aikman
RB	Barry Foster	Emmitt Smith
WR	Andre Reed	Rice, Monk
D	???		Darrel Green
K	St'vich		Lohmiller

Coach	Bobby Ross	Joe Gibbs

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: The 49ers are methodically brutal
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 19:27:26 GMT

Above quote by Randy Cross as the Niners lead the
Vikings:   

Niners 17  Vikings  7
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
  is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
From: pdietz@cse.unl.edu (Phil Dietz)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Steelers '92
Date: 16 Dec 1992 20:39:22 GMT
Organization: NCEMRSoft
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cse.unl.edu

>    This Sunday the Vikings come to Three River Stadium. A tough game on 
>any normal day but tougher because Booby Brister will once again be starting
>at quarterback.  This game is important to all Steeler fans as a victory keeps
>our Home Field chances alive. But it's extra important to me because I would
>love to see the Packers win the NFC Central. They have come a long way this
>year and it would be great to see them go all the way and shut up all of the
>Eagle, 9er, Cryboy, etc...fans who thinks their teams are invincible.

You mentioned it in the first sentence....with him Pittsburgh is doomed.

"Flubby" Brister sucks big time!

Last Week I told my friends to bet for the Bears to waste Pitt but they
didn't believe me....  I was right and they lost their bets.  Now they too know
how bad "Flubby" is.

Unitl Neil comes back...expect yet more losses (yes even to Clevlend at 
the Blast Furnace....)

Phil

--

Phil "the demon advocate" Dietz    pdietz@cse.unl.edu  University Of Nebraska
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 07:50:11 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: defensive statistics, week 15
Date: 16 Dec 92 21:52:57 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX


		       yardage		    rank
team		total	rush	pass	rush	pass
----------------------------------------------------
Dallas  	3466	1176	2290	2	4
New Orleans	3596	1369	2227	8	3
Kansas City	3686	1488	2198	14	1
Houston 	3689	1342	2347	7	5
San Diego	3708	1190	2518	3	10
Washington	3757	1389	2368	9	6
Philadelphia	3813	1296	2517	5	9
LA Raiders	3889	1480	2409	13	7
Seattle 	3949	1735	2214	22	2
Minnesota	4016	1549	2467	17	8
Pittsburgh	4028	1505	2523	15	11
Miami   	4034	1311	2723	6	16
Buffalo 	4114	1240	2874	4	21
Cleveland	4131	1396	2735	10	18
Chicago 	4199	1635	2564	20	12
San Francisco	4252	1152	3100	1	28
NY Jets 	4306	1733	2573	21	13
Green Bay	4314	1535	2779	16	20
New England	4353	1626	2727	19	17
NY Giants	4449	1766	2683	24	15
Detroit 	4455	1473	3022	11	25
Indianapolis	4490	1818	2672	26	14
Tampa Bay	4495	1473	3022	12	26
Phoenix 	4520	1558	2962	18	24
Denver  	4641	1761	2880	23	22
LA Rams 	4819	2047	2772	28	19
Atlanta 	4838	1930	2908	27	23
Cincinnati	4859	1799	3060	25	27

----
Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber)
Subject: Re: all SB winner
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:48:50 GMT

> There's an interesting statistic that I noticed when the Giants went to
> the Super Bowl for the second time:
> 
> 	Any team that won its first Super Bowl appearance has never
> 	lost a Super Bowl:
> 
> 		Green Bay	(2-0)
> 		NY Jets		(1-0)
> 		Pittsburgh	(4-0)
> 		San Francisco	(4-0)
> 		Chicago		(1-0)
> 		NY Giants	(2-0)
> 
> This accounts for 14 of the 25 (at the time, 26 now) Super Bowls.  I don't
> know what it means, but it seems interesting.
> 
> 					Lorne Schachter

     Might mean that winning breeds winning attitudes for the future,
wheras the Broncos, Bills and Vikings of the world are left to be the
cannon fodder for the above-listed teams.

Just a thought.

HO HO FRAGGIN' HO!
Kevin Stamber
Purdue University

COWHER POWER!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 04:10:07 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: martens@laurel.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Subject: Re: Packers win at Houston
Organization: Ohio State U. Dept. of Computer Science
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 14:51:36 GMT

In article <101915@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:

	[ ... ]

>The Oilers drive down quickly and score again but on the ensuing onside
>kick Sanjay "Muscle" Beach recovers for the Pack.

At that point I decided to publicly aplogize for calling Beach a
stiff.  Sorry.

>Playoff hopes are still alive.
>
>And the amazing thing is that they did this all today WITHOUT the help
>of a running game.  Just error free (1 turnover, 2 or 3 penalties), precise
>and accurate football.

Actually, GB did have a running game:  the RBS consistently picked
up a yard (give or take a couple) whenever called upon.  1 yard
and a cloud of dust?

-- 
      "C'mon, what's the big hold up?!  Let's go, up there!
		  Bring on the snow!"  -- Calvin

-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Subject: Re: Jimmy Johnson: Love em or hate em, he's a winner (and a whiner)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 07:18:47 GMT

>Dallas is a solid all around team, but they won't get the chance
>to play the 49er's; I don't think they can beat the Saints, who
>will probably be their first opponent in the 2nd round of the playoffs.
>I know the game will be in Dallas, but NO plays well on the road.

Yes, and we all know how NO turns it up a notch in the playoffs...

GT

>--
>
>The rayster             ** Go Oilers



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: marshall@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM (Bob Marshall)
Subject: Re: Lott/49ers
Reply-To: marshall@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 17:05:02 GMT

In article <1992Dec18.010020.17301@phx.mcd.mot.com>, rolandb@phx.mcd.mot.com (roland blackwell) writes:
>Ronnie Lott has stated he doesn't want to play for the Raiders next year.
>He sayes he would like to play for San Francisco again. Does anyone have
>any new news on this.  His contract is up and he will leave the Raiders.
>I certainly hope he gets to play for the 49ers again.  Maybe we will get
>to see another back-to-back 49er SB victory. YES I SAID IT.

The only thing I have heard is that the 49ers would be willing to take
him back, and are prepared to offer him some kind of coaching job after
he retires. None of this is firm, however. I think everyone involved is
smart enough not to talk about it too much until the season is over (which
will be very soon for the Raiders, but hopefully not for the 49ers!).

=============================================================================
Bob Marshall                     \\     "Women aren't as smart as they
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     think they are; they think we
Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    men know a lot more than we
marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   really do."
"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Tim the Toolman
=============================================================================