HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L%UICVM.bitnet@WUVMD.Wustl.Edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.bitnet@WUVMD.Wustl.Edu"
X-VMS-Cc: WARWICKR
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 11:00:00 CST
From:         Richard Warwick <WARWICKR@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Wrong list

DATE SENT:  18-DEC-1992 10:48:42
>
>Could I suggest comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy for the following message ?
>     and pleaaaaase, let's just ignore it otherwise.
>
> Walter Knopf

Walter,

while I don't disagree with the suggestion that a Mac vs
Windows religious discussion is a waste of bandwidth,
many lurkers (self included) only have access to this list through
the listserver, and have no access to "newsgroups"

Richard

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Richard Warwick, Manager of PC Services  Internet: WARWICKR@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU |
| Saint Louis University                      Voice: (314) 577-8620          |
| Medical Center Computing Services                                          |
| 1402 South Grand Avenue  C308                                              |
| St. Louis  MO  63104                     Unix? - What's Unix? :,)          |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:44:11 -0800
From:         Tony Abo <tabo@HITECH.COM>
Subject:      Memory limits in windows 3.1
              11 Dec 1992 15:48:00 +0000 <9212120040.AA27978@hitech.com>

   No, you miss the point!  The file must be removed or a switch made to a
   temporary file, (before trying to create another permanent file) if you want
   windows to properly recommend a new optimum size.  Otherwise the checks may
   not be performed and the size may remain excessive.

Fomr previous discussions, it sounds like what Windows recommends
may not actually be meaningful.  (OK, what is the algorithm it uses?)


------------------------------------------------------------

Tony Abo
Hitech Systems, Inc.
1964 Westwood Blvd. # 435
Los Angeles, CA 90025

Internet: tabo@hitech.com
Voice:    (310) 475 3210
Fax:      (310) 474 0655

This is my clever little saying at the end of my mail messages
because everyone else seems to have one.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi (Sten Westerback, Nokia Telecommunications, FINLAND)
Subject: Re: HP Laserjet
Organization: Nokia Telecommunications.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:06:46 GMT

In article <WIN3-L%92121607242079@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU>, KEYING@VTVM2.BITNET (Keying Ye) writes:
> Maybe it is caused by the lack of memory in the printer.  I had a similar probl
> em before.  After the extended memory is installed, everything goes fine.
> Key

There may also be problems with the memory modules themself. Our HPLJIIIp
with 3M memory some time ago informed us that it has only 1M. This caused
the printer LCD display to display "Out of memory" and then skip the rest of 
the page. Probably in your case the memory seems to be ok when the printer
starts but thenlater fails. Our problem disappeared by momentarely taking
out the memory module or simply by making sure they are inserted well enough.

Also you should check the printer driver to make sure the specified memory
amount is the correct one.

Sten
============================================================================
Sten Westerback (BSc. electronics)          Telephone: +358+0 +5115891(work)
X400      : c=fi, a=Elisa, p=Nokia Telecom, S=Westerback, G=Sten, (u=SWS)
Internet  : swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi        Time zone : EET (=GMT+3)
Snailmail : Konalantie  12 A16, SF-00370 HELSINKI, FINLAND (EUROPE, EARTH) 
 Test the utility at WSMR-SIMTEL20.Army.mil::pd1:<msdos.dirutl>swxd303d.zip
   Note that i am working, but not speaking for Nokia Telecommunications!
============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:42:22 -0500
From:         Joe Morris <IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Speed vs. resolution

Date: 15 Dec 1992 09:46:09 -0800
From: Tony Abo <tabo@HITECH.COM>

>>   Has anyone noticed that if you run Win at a higher resolution (1024x768)
>>   that windows slows down? Maybe Im just Imagining it.

>That doesn't surprise me.  If you consider the fact that the
>display maps to memory, and higher resolution display requires
>more memory to to represent the screen, and that "more memory"
>takes longer to write than "less memory" it only follows that
>screen updates will take longer.  You can bet that things running
>in Windows do lots of screen updates.

This is not true in all cases.  My video card (TSeng ET4000 based) acutally
runs faster and takes less memory in 1024x768x16 as opposed to lower
resolutions (not a huge difference, but enough to notice it).  It
really helps me to get more on the screen at once.  Anyway..., I was told
that this was not unusual as manufacturers usually optimize their cards
in the "top" mode where they are usually bechmark tested against other
video cards.

While we are on the subject of video, I have a plea to all those programmers
out there who develop some truly terrific shareware/freeware apps:

Make sure it runs in SVGA (1024x768) properly.  I have lost count of all the
freeware and shareware apps I've tried where the fonts in the dialog boxes
and associated windows are extremely large that it screws up the display.
Not sure why this ocurrs.  Doesn't happen with all of them, but about
30% this situation ocurrs.
______________________________________________________________________________
Joe Morris at Western Carolina University; Cullowhee, NC    Practice safe hex,
Internet:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU (preferable)       Just say NO to viruses,
BITNET:    IS480P02@WCUVAX1.BITNET        And always wear a write-protect tab.
ALL-IN-1 mail users:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU@IN
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: mughi@netcom.com (Ed Kallen)
Subject: Re: heim.sys problem
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 08:53:27 GMT

Joe Morris <IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU> writes:

>Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 15:47:24 SAT
>From: thomas griep <FACN335%SAUPM00.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu>

>>I've just bought a 386 with wp51, mswindows and wpwin. The wp51 works
>>fine, but when I try to get to windows I am told the heim.sys is not
>>installed or incorrectly placed in the config.sys. I've tried everything
>>I can think of the fix this to no avail

>>Any and all advice will be greatly appreciated.


>TOM,

>Seeing how you misspell HIMEM, it seems maybe the manufacturer might
>not have placed "DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS" line properly.  Maybe they
>misspelled it?  It the line the very FIRST line in your CONFIG.SYS?
>And is it spelled correctly?

If you're using Windows 3.1, I would make that line read:
DEVICE=C:\WINDOWS\HIMEM.SYS
It is a slightly newer version that the one used by DOS 5.0.
Also, it doesn't need to be the very first line in your CONFIG.SYS
but it should be close to the first (e.g. I normally put FILES=, and 
BUFFERS= statements ahead of it).

Also, If you're using QEMM386 you don't need HIMEM.SYS at all.

>Try these items first.  If you still have problems, send us a copy
>of your config.sys file.
>______________________________________________________________________________
>Joe Morris at Western Carolina University; Cullowhee, NC    Practice safe hex,
>Internet:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU (preferable)       Just say NO to viruses,
>BITNET:    IS480P02@WCUVAX1.BITNET        And always wear a write-protect tab.
>ALL-IN-1 mail users:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU@IN

Mr. Ed
mughi@netcom.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi (Sten Westerback, Nokia Telecommunications, FINLAND)
Subject: Re: (no subject given)
Organization: Nokia Telecommunications.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 13:29:42 GMT

In article <9212151746.AA04230@hitech.com>,         Tony Abo <tabo@HITECH.COM> writes:
>    Has anyone noticed that if you run Win at a higher resolution (1024x768)
>    that windows slows down? Maybe Im just Imagining it.
> 
> That doesn't surprise me.  If you consider the fact that the
> display maps to memory, and higher resolution display requires
> more memory to to represent the screen, and that "more memory"
> takes longer to write than "less memory" it only follows that
> screen updates will take longer.  You can bet that things running
> in Windows do lots of screen updates.

I also think that a 1024x768x16 is slower than 1024x768x256. Personally
i prefer the 800x600x256 mode which is has an pixelsize small enough for
my 14 inch display. Imho, 1024x768 needs an 17" display.

What about the S3-based cards. Do they also support 16 color modes or
are they optimized for 256 or more colors?

Sten
============================================================================
Sten Westerback (BSc. electronics)          Telephone: +358+0 +5115891(work)
Internet  : swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi        Time zone : EET (=GMT+3)
 Test the utility at WSMR-SIMTEL20.Army.mil::pd1:<msdos.dirutl>swxd303d.zip
   Note that i am working, but not speaking for Nokia Telecommunications!
============================================================================
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: Memory limits in windows 3.1
From: edowdy@vax1.umkc.edu
Date: 12 Dec 92 18:40:34 CST
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City
NNTP-Posting-Host: vax1.umkc.edu

In article <9212081628.AA08894@jupiter.Sun.CSD.unb.ca>, Chris Newton <u0xh@JUPITER.SUN.CSD.UNB.CA> writes:
> I would like to know how many Mbytes windows 3.1 can manange in
> enhaced mode with swap file permanent. I hear something saying only
> 16M. Thats is the true? Is realy useful with a 486 with 8M?
> 
>         I have a 386-33 with 8 Megs, and Windows tells me that I can have a 16 M
> eg
>  permanent swap file.  I set it to 12 Megs, to save hard drive space however.
>  So in effect I have 20 megs of memory, so there is definately no limit, at
>  least not at the 16Meg range.
> 
> Chris



	However, in most instances 8mg is plenty with windows. I have 8mg and
have plenty of room left over. I would say unless you are a power user, that
permanent swap file Chris is wasting your hard drive space and slowing your
windows down somewhat. 




Eric








Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Encoding: 42 TEXT
X-Mailer: Network Courier V2.1a
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 15:45:00 +0000
From:         CHDRAKE@MAIL.UAMS.EDU
Subject:      RE: Windows and autoexec.bat

>I want to include the "win" command in the autoexec.bat file, but
>I want to do some other things using BEFORE the win command executes.
>I have tried putting in a PAUSE and also putting all of
>the other things at other locations in the autoexec.bat file
>in order to prevent win from executing before these other functions.
>The weird thing is that one thing required by these other functions
>is some keyboard input from the user.  "Win" just kind of tromples
>all over this and the request for keyboard input doesn't happen until
>AFTER the user exits from windows.
>
>Has anybody else bumped into this problem before?  How did you solve
>it?
>
>Thanks for any pointers anybody can give me.
>
>virginia
>

One of two possible things...

1) If you are on a Novell network, your login script may be invoking
windows.  I see this quite often here on campus.

or

2) If you execute win from your autoexec.bat file, and you modify the
autoexec.bat file while still inside windows, parts of it may try to
execute after you exit windows.  This is the old dos situation of replacing
a batch file while it is executing.  When dos tries to execute the next line
in the batch file, it gets a newer one than it last executed.

Hope this helps.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 --
CHDRAKE@MAIL.UAMS.EDU (Internet mail)
Charles H. Drake, Jr. ("Bert Drake")
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
4301 West Markham Street, Mail Slot 549
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205-7199, United States of America
Phone: (501) 686-7190
From: FGL92016@NOBIVM.BITNET (Espen Haakonsen)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Same thing...
Date: 16 Dec 92 16:53:49 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Oh I forgot to say, I believe that there may be others wanting to
know what to do with a Windows virus, so I will summarise for all
of you afterwards.

Espen.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 11:58:04 -0600
From:         K119GG@TAMVM1.BITNET
Subject:      486sx/dx

From:   George G Galdiano

Bill Gates whishes he owned Intel - as I do. However, I have less of a chance
of being sued if I owned Intel than BG would. How is that monoploy lawsuit
against MS going anyway? Last I heard, it looked like MS would have to sell
the application part or DOS part and BG would sell the DOS part if he had to
divide the company up.

                 George G Galdiano
                 Programmer/Analyst I
                 CSC SIMS
                 Phone: (409)845-3064
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: VAXF::IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: MONTANEZM
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 13 Dec 1992 12:55:04 -0700
From:         "Mark Montaez, System Manager, AHEC,
              (303)556-2409" <MONTANEZM@AHECAS.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: heim.sys problem

Looks like you need to fix the line in question to say "himem.sys"

Good luck!!!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 06:46:06 -0500
From:         Louis Jezsik <jezsik@PX4.STFX.CA>
Subject:      Re: Windows Magazine

I like Windows Magazine, but the other day I picked up one that
I think may be even better.  Windows Users has the easiest layout
of any magazine I have ever read.  The articles are to the point
and well written.  The latest issue has a 'thumbnail' review of
quite a few windows programs.  Pick up a copy and have a look.

As an aside, has anyone even BOTHERED to read a magazine with the
title of something like WINDOWS and dos magazine?  This is the
one with a HUGE banner saying Windows and a tiny little one with
'and DOS' added as if an after-thought.  Publishers deperate to
get some market share ...

Louis
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Pmrqc:      1
Priority:     normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 14 Dec 1992 11:38:19 CST
From:         Darrin Wait <WAITD@COLUMBIA.DSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Alternatives to NWPOPUP?

=>Does a decent alternative to NWPOPUP exist?
=>
=>NWPOPUP frustrates me a bit because I tend to acknowledge away the popup
=>window before I even discover it's there when I am working in e.g. a word
=>processor (because NWPOPUP responds to pressing the spacebar, which is not
=>exactly a rare event...).
=>
=>Also, I could imagine a number of enhancements to NWPOPUP, like an option
=>for immediately answering to a message having been SENDt from another user (
=>instead of OKing away NWPOPUP, locate NWTOOLS in my messy desktop, starting
=>SEND or USERLIST from there, specifying username etc.).
=>
=>Looking forward to an overwhelming list of ftp-sites and file names,
=>Bjorn.
=>

Bjorn:

    I have asked myself that question many times.  I have looked (Sort of)
for a better on, but have never found one.  If you find on could you
please let me know.
    I know it is possible because reciently I was playing with Desqview/X
and it has varient of NWPOPUP (Not called that of course) that captures the
message and throws it into a message list.  When the first message comes
in the BOX apprears and places the message with a 1 in front of it.  Then
you manually have to put the box back in the background.  As more messages
come in it just places them in the box (poping it up if you wish) with the
other messages.  I sent 20+ messages to myself and I could still scroll
through all the messages.
  I am telling you (and the net) this because maybe some talented windows
programmer will write a program like this for windows and send a copy of it
to all of us?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|Darrin (DK) Wait                 | Disclamer: My views are my own.  |
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++|+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|Co-Sysop of THE SUPERIOR BBS     |     BBSing isn't just a hobby    |
| BBS # 605-256-5493              |          its a way of life       |
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|Internet = WAITD@COLUMBIA.DSU.EDU|      BITNET = S91177@SDNET       |
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 19:34:17 CET
From:         Borys <BMAJ@PLEARN.BITNET>

If anybody know new fast and good driver for Paradize VGA card please tell me.

*   +   /\   +     *   .  *   /\    .   *   .   ************************
 . .   //\\     * .  +  *    //\\ .  +          *                      *
+ *   O/O\\O  +    +   .  . O//O\O       +  * . *  BMAJ@PLEARN         *
 . .  /O/ \O\   +  . *     /O/ \\O\  . *        *  BMAJ@PLEARN.EDU.PL  *
  +  O / \O\ O    *     *   /O/ O\ \    .  * +  *                      *
*   . //||\ \  .    +    . / / \ O\  +    .   . *  FROM  BORYS PIOTR   *
  +  /  || \O\   .  * +   /O/ ||\ O    *   +  . *        MAJEWSKI      *
*MERRY*CHRISTMAS*AND*A*HAPPY*NEW*1993*TO*YOU*ALL************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:53:37 -0500
From:         JDBER@CONNCOLL.BITNET
Subject: Re: Virus?? HELP

>I have just installed Windows 3.1 on my machine (a PC), and it starts
>just allright, but the light for the hard drive keeps blinking all the
>time, and it is VERY slow. It takes over a minute to load windows,
>and almost as much to load word. I have a 386 with 16 megahertz.
>Have I got a virus? Is there a virus remover for windows?

Perhaps you have a lot of fonts installed. After installing CorelDraw! I had
about 250 fonts and it took about 6 minutes to load.


                                              _________________________________
                Jason D. Bernstein           /             ___
___________________________________________/      _-  ____/.- | _--_-__--_-
Bitnet:    jdber@conncoll                         __  ----    | --_----_-_--
Internet:  jdber@mvax.cc.conncoll.edu             --_     /___|__ -------____-/
Mail:      Box 3118 Connecticut College          --_-__  /**               #/
           New London, CT 06320                 ___---- |**   ___-------  |
Telephone: (203) 439-3655                         __---  *______________/ _--_
-------------------------------------------\ ---__---_-___-______-____-_-_
                Vice President,              \ -  ---  ------____--___--___-_
                Computer Geeks Anonymous       \______________________________
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Acknowledge-To: <U2347@WVNVM>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 20:53:22 EST
From:         "Thomas L. Blaskovics" <U2347@WVNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Memory limits in windows 3.1

thought I would throw my 2 cents worth in.  I have a 486 with 16mgs or
RAM and a 524Mb Conner drive.  When I installed Win 3.1 on that machine
(it was virtually clean the temp drive only took 25mgs.  How come?

 Thanks,
 Tom Blaskovics
 U2347@WVNVM            BITNET   Address
 U2347@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU  INTERNET Address
 What I think and say is not attributable to anybody else
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 21:14:00 +0200
From:         HOUSSAM <HOUSSAH5@EGAUCACS.BITNET>
Subject:      RE: How do I start Windows 3.1 ?

why don't you just make it simple. try "win".....
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 09:24:06 SST
From:         K C Lun <COFLUNKC@NUSVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: ** Full Page Scanner OCR Software that is Trainable?

I have been using a software called OmniPage with my Hewlett-Packard
ScanJet and am quite pleased with the results.  It is also trainable.

KC Lun
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <griffith@casper.med.uth.tmc.edu>
X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:52:00 CST
From:         "Dr. James Griffiths" <griffith@CASPER.MED.UTH.TMC.EDU>
Subject:      Ultrastor 14f & windows 3.1

Howdy all,

Does anyone the correct (read: best) settings in the system.ini
when you are using the Ultrstor 14f SCSI-II & a toshiba hard drive
the instructions say double buffering is not necessary, but you
should set virtualhirq=off under windows 3.0 ... doesn't mention about
3.1.
Also it was my understanding the ultrastor recently came out with
32 bit compatible drivers .. So I supposedly could turn on the 32 bit
access.  Currently my windows throws a fit if I try.

Thanks for any help,

James
[griffith@casper.med.uth.tmc.edu]
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 09:49:12 -0800
From:         Tony Abo <tabo@HITECH.COM>
Subject:      486sx/dx
              15 Dec 1992 09:16:04 CST <9212151719.AA13988@uu4.psi.com>

   ...  By selling the chips as
   a low end 486 (ie, 486sx), B. Gates and Co. is able to recoup what
   would otherwise be losses.

Don't tell me Bill Gates own Intell too!  (Wouldn't that be a
kick in the pants!)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 14 Dec 1992 15:20:00 EDT
From:         BRUCEB@FAIR1.BITNET
Subject:      Re: heim.sys problem

HIMEM.SYS SHOULD BE THE FIRST LINE IN THE CONFIG.SYS FILE FOLLOWED BY DOS HIGH U
   MB

BB
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 15:23:00 EST
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Newest W4W (2.0c) Re: Word 4 Windows Header/Footer -->
              Never-Never Land

>Is there any notable difference between 2.0b and 2.0c.
>Have anyone heard about when the next "real" version of W4W will come.

I think the only thing "new" in 2.0C is improved support for FoxPro and
perhaps also for Windows for Workgroups. I don't think the next version of
Winword has gone into beta testing yet.

Michael D. Gordon
CIS: 71053,471
Internet: gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  18-DEC-1992 15:23:36