HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dave@bradley.bradley.edu (David Vessell)
Subject: Re: NFC Central
Organization: Bradley University
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 23:33:09 GMT

Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>Tampa Bay continues to amaze me beating teams that everyone thought
>should be much better than them.  As a Sam Wyche fan, I'm tempted to
>give the credit to better coaching, since they don't seem to have that
>much more in terms of weapons than last year, but I think the young team
>is getting experience.

I think a lot of it is coaching.  But remember way back in ancient history
when Vinny Testeverde won the Heismann Trophy.  I knew he always had it but
I guess it took a coach like Sam Wyche to get his head back in the game.
And the Bucs have always had good defense, the last couple years anyway.  I
too am amazed, but I always knew they had talent, and coaching can make a
difference.  There isn't a better illustration of this than Tampa Bay.

-- 
=========*davE*.....making the world safe for intelligent dance music.=========
Big black nemesis. Parthenogenesis. No one move a muscle as the dead come home.
--------------------------{dave@bradley.bradley.edu}---------------------------
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The FISH EAT BUFFALFO MEAT!
Keywords: FISH EAT BUFFALO BILLS!
Date: 6 Oct 92 15:29:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: uvmark.1992Oct06.152911.12170
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

In article <1992Oct5.173259.13198@merlin.hgc.edu> sala8864@hgc.edu (gustavo salas) writes:
>
>[Stuffs deleted....]
>>Thank you for noticing. Amazingly you show exhibited alot of
>>restraint. Let's be honest, I am, what part of my report did
>>you object to, besides the score?  If you remember my posts
>>regarding the Bill win over the 49ers, I gave credit where
>>credit was due. I am actually am showing alot more restraint 
>>than most OR some of the Bill fanatics. If you want a flame
>>started, then it is your turn, if not, please accept the defeat
>>of the Bills by a Superior Miami TEAM. Like Kelly said on
>		   ========??????
>Objection your honor... Miami did play very well and they deserve the
>win. But, personally, I don't think FISHES are any better than BILLS.
>They were just very well prepared and Kelly had a bad day as well
>as other players. It is not a news thatthe Bills have no secondaries,
>and Dan and Keith and Paige virtually killed the scondaries. They looked
>awful. 

Well, first off, the FISHES were at least 27 points better than them BILLS
on this day.  And not that he said "Superior Miami TEAM", not that the talent
level was higher.  Miami won the game due to great play and OUTSTANDING 
coaching.  The defense wasn't dominating, but the plan Olivadetti (sp) put
in was perfect.   It confused the Bills, and they just couldn't adjust.
It seemed that the Dolphins concentrated on 2 things.  Stop Thurman Thomas
from running the ball.  To the point of assigning a key linebacker to shadow
him.  Secondly, mix up the defense so that there is more confusion in the
secondary, and Kelly would get confused.  Kelly came in with so much confidence
that he kept running the same plays/patterns, and the Dolphins were extremely
well prepared for it.  Louis Oliver did the perfect job of playing the ol'
Freebie, and identified the pattern being run so he could be in the right 
place, three times!!!

>
>
>- a Bills addict.


-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Serious Miami Fans
Date: 6 Oct 92 20:06:44 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.182832.20308@cs.uwp.edu>, krueger@cs.uwp.edu (Gerald Krueger) writes:
> 
> 1) What is this Hybrid Defense?
> 
> 			I heard it was 5 LB's and then I heard it was
> 			5 DB's.  I would guess it would be 5 LB's because
> 			the Dolphins are deep at linbacker and weak on
> 			the line.  
> 
>     x   O     O   x	Who played the most time with this 2 - 5 - 4?
>        x   x   x   	the line?  The linebackers were
> 			Cox, Coleman, Griggs, Grimsley and Offerdahl?
> 			Where did they line up?  What was the strategy?
>     O is a lineman
>     x is a linebacker
> 
> 2) Will this defense be used often or was it a one time thing?


The LA Rams used a somewhat similar defense until a couple of years
ago. They called it the Eagle Defense. They were forced to do that 
bcoz of lack of good def. linemen. 


> 
> 			The Saints use a 3 - 4 but rush Jackson and Swilling 
> 			like lineman.  Why not use a 2 - 5 and rush a
> 			LB or two?  The offense doesn't know which LB's
> 			are going to rush and are off-balance.  I think
> 			it is an excellent strategy for the Dolphins.
> 			Are my assumtions right or am I way off base?
> 
> 			Can this sort of defense stop the run?  Were
> 			the Dolphins getting penetration into the backfield
> 			or using the "bend but don't break" strategy that
> 			wasn't working in the past?


The problem with this defense is that you can run the ball up
the middle, between the tackles. A power runner with a decent O Line
can get 3/4 yds a pop. A patient offensive team
can exploit this weakness. Running to the outside maybe more
difficult with all those LBs. 



_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################

















Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:11:39 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.040326.20855@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes:
>Up until tonight, I thought the 49ers were the team to beat in the NFC.
>But after watching the Eagles devour the Cowboys tonight (and keeping
>in mind the way they demolished the Broncos), it sure looks like the
>Eagles are the now the premier team in the NFC. We may find out when
>the 49ers and the Eagles meet later this season, and it looks possible
>they will meet again in the NFC championship game. Right now, even though
>I'm a 49ers fans, I'd say the Eagles have the inside track. But the
>49ers are very close, and they certainly have what it takes to beat
>the Eagles if they play a halfway decent game.
>
Geesh! You call yourself a Niner FAN! :-)  I saw the same game you
did, I think, and although the score indicates a rout, it was more
of a "failure to communicate", RE: the Cowpokes didn't know what was
going on. They were caught with their pants down. Aikman was truly
awful and his offense was equally up to task. Their defense was
running around with one boot half on and hopping around like drunken 
cowboys.  The defense for the Eagles turned the game around for
them. If Cunningham has those kind of stats against the Niners, it
will not be enough.  The Eagles will have to play their BEST game to
beat the Niners in my opinion. Although I am not a 100% Young fan,
he has now begun to settle down more, rather than run. When he does
run though, it is usually for good yardage. In observing Cunningham
last night, his first instinct is to "tuck" the damn ball in and
run.  This type of QB is never going t win a SB, if it does, it will
be the first. 
>
>Bob Marshall                     \\     "It ain't age
>marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   It's the miles"
>=============================================================================


-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  Let us be thankful for the fools; but for them the rest
  of us could not succeed.  -   Mark Twain
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Predictions and Results for Week 4
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:14:24 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

Here are the results of last week's predictions.  The computer program
picked 6 of 11 games correctly, a so-so result.
===



        
                     Week #4 Game Predictions


       Atlanta        _31   26          Tampa Bay      _27   17

     @ Chicago        _41   20        @ Detroit        _23   27



       Pittsburgh     __3   25          N.Y. Jets      _10   21

     @ Green Bay      _17   16        @ L.A. Rams      _18   18



       San Francisco  _16   25          Minnesota      _42   25

     @ New Orleans    _10   19        @ Cincinnati     __7   26



       Denver         _12   21          San Diego      __0   20

     @ Cleveland      __0   20        @ Houston        _27   26



       L.A. Raiders   __7   18          Buffalo        _41   35

     @ Kansas City    _27   24        @ New England    __7   10



       Miami          _19   23

     @ Seattle        _17   20
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jcollins@sparkle.tnis (Jon Collins CT/90)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles/Cowboys (Re: EAGLES WILL GO 16-0 IF ANYONE DOES)
Date: 5 Oct 92 13:57:25 GMT
Reply-To: jcollins@sparkle.tnis
Organization: Sun Microsystems


Might as well give my prediction:

     Eagles:  24
     Cowboys: 13

The Eagles D is just too good.  Although Dallas has only given up only 2 sacks all year, Simmons and White will beat on Aikman pretty hard.  Both teams have equal offenses.  Cunningham, Walker, and Barnett match up evenly with Aikman, Smith, and Irvin.  The defense is the key to this game.  Should be a great one!!

Jon

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: asagar@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ashish Sagar)
Subject: Dangerous Dan
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:38:55 GMT

>Article 28145 of rec.sport.football.pro:
>Although I am Canadian and have watch Warren Moon play for the Eskimos
>there is no doubt in my mind that Dan Marino is by far the premiere
>QB in NFL no matter how many records Moon will brake.


Wheather Dan breaks records or Moon does, whats the point unless they
can carry their team to the Super Bowl and win it.  Thats where
QBs like Montana and Kelly(though not won a super bowl but taken the
bills twice there) outshine and stand way above Qbs only breaking
records.  These are the QBs that one can say are premiere QBs and
dangerous Qbs. 

Ashish 
*****  ***    *  *  ****   **** **** ****
*  **  * *    ****  ****   **   **** ****
*****  ***       *     *   **** *  * ****
-- 
*****  ***    *  *  ****   **** **** ****
*  **  * *    ****  ****   **   **** ****
*****  ***       *     *   **** *  * ****
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: test
Date: 1 Oct 1992 14:51:58 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

sorry guys, just a test
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Quaterbacks:Steve Young the best in the league
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:49:01 GMT
Organization: Houses of the Holy

In article <jjonsson.164@alexandria.lib.utah.edu>, jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
> In article <90932@netnews.upenn.edu> mckernan@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Robert L Mckernan) writes:
> 
> 
> 
> >       IF A GAME IS ON THE LINE THE ONE QB I WANT (AND I DON'T CARE
> >WHAT KIND OF GAME HE IS HAVING) WOULD BE JOHN ELWAY.
> 
> >                               ROB
> 
> 
> Yeah, Elway's proven many times over he can win the BIG game. ;-)

Yeah, pal, laugh now.  Elway does it again; 2 TD's in 2 mins. to bring
back his team from behind to win for the 21st time. 

> 
> 
> Jeff Jonsson
> Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: kennedy@inter-tel.com (Matt Kennedy)
Subject: Re: Future QB of the LA Raiders...
Organization: Inter-Tel, Inc. (Chandler, AZ)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 21:46:03 GMT

In <Adriene_Nazaretian.31.717773024@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!) writes:

>Both of you need a break here folks, Todd has STARTED (high school/college/
>pro) a total of 15 times (no that is not a typo).  ITs what the annoucers 
>were talking about last night!  Of course he needs time to develop....  

Sorry.  Marinovich has started 15 times SINCE LEAVING high school.  That
includes 12 starts at USC and three starts for the Raiders.

=====================
Matthew S. Kennedy
kennedy@inter-tel.com
=====================
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mcgead@isaac.its.rpi.edu (Darren McGeary)
Subject: Final scores of 4:00 games?
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 23:41:07 GMT

   Could someone post the final scores of the 4:00 games?

-- 
Darren McGeary -  mcgead@rpi.edu          Freedom of religion means freedom 
PRO-CHOICE - THE AMERICAN WAY             FROM religion!!
Banish religion from government!          -These are my opinions. They just
Atheists Unite!!                           happen to also be the right ones.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: thaddeus@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Thaddeus R. Crews)
Subject: Re: Power Ratings after week 4
Organization: Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, USA
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 19:54:06 GMT

In article <16872C065.TSTEEGM3@ua1vm.ua.edu> TSTEEGM3@ua1vm.ua.edu (Tom Steegmann) writes:
>          OK, netters, after watching some of the power ratings here,
>my associate Jon Acker and I have devised our own.  I am in the process
>of writing a simple c program to automate this a bit. I hate the pen
>and paper method.  All statistics are from todays USA Today.  Today,
>the AFC, tommorrow the NFC and overall.
> 
>1.  Buffalo    29.1
>2.  KC         27.7
>3.  Miami      27.3
>4.  Houston    27.3
>5.  LA         27
>6.  Pittsburgh 26.9
>7.  San Diego  26.3
>8.  NY Jets    25.7
>9.  Seattle    25.1
>10. Denver     24.4
>11. Cleveland  24.4
>12. Cincinnati 24.2
>13. Indy       22.4
> 
	[stuff deleted]
>Tom Steegmann
>SQUISH THE FISH
> 
> 

O.K. net fans, how about this?  Why don't a few of us join Tom & Jon
and make our own power rating program.  The real trick is to decide
on the proper weights for each catagory.  I think it would be interesting
to see who has the "most accurate" power rating, based on how teams
perform week to week.  I would even consider compiling the ratings into
a nice net-presentable form if all ratings were first mailed to me.

Just an idea.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Thad Crews                         (email thaddeus@vuse.vanderbilt.edu)
              "Crime would not pay if the government ran it!" 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: d5kjell@dtek.chalmers.se (Kjell Johansson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: HALF-TIME SCORES
Date: 30 Sep 92 02:57:02 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg Sweden

ded@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu (nod sivad) writes:

>>
>>So do you think that half time scores add up to as much as .001
>>percent of USENET traffic?  Hardly the "bandwidth buster".
>>

>No, not by themselves, but when added to the other chaff in
>newsgroups everywhere, add up to a hefty percentage of USENET traffic.

>>
>>If you're really concerned just cut down some of the groups your site
>>receives.

>This happens all the time.  And guess which groups system administrators
>choose to eliminate.  comp.unix.bizarre.bugs?  No.  comp.geek.basement? Never.
>rec.sport.football.nfl?  Bingo!

>Perhaps we should send your name and address to all the people who've
>lost news feeds because of attitudes such as yours.  I'm sure they'd
>like to thank you.

Yeah, and chaff like this wastes LOTS of bandwidth...
Maybe you could all ask yourself some important questions instead, like:
Why is Boomer SO bad?
Will Montana be back? If so, why?
etc. etc.

C'mon guys, this is rec.sport.football.pro - not alt.flame.ignorant

* Walker * d5kjell@dtek.chalmers.se *
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: seth@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (peter.r.clark..jr)
Subject: Re: Questions about Eagles
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 15:25:54 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.132148.2998@athena.mit.edu>, centry@athena.mit.edu (Jae H Nam) writes:
> 	I know about the Seals and Beach(ex-Jet, what a surprise...)
> acquisitions, but I was wondering if there are any current moves
> going on.
> 
> 	I know that the Eagles are pretty solid right now, but
> you can never have too much talent and depth, esp. because of the
> possibility of injuries.  Plus we should always be building for the
> future.

I agree copmletely. Never feel like you have enough. BUT...

> 	I'll probably get flamed for this, but what about a trade
> for Andre Rison for some draft picks?  Rison should be the next Rice
> and he's young and in Glanville's doghouse (or so I've heard...).
> Atlanta seems like they're in total disarray.  If their problems
> continue and they have a potentially losing season, then there
> might be some reshuffling going around, right?
> 	I know we have Williams and Barnett, but could you imagine
> what Rison, who is constantly double-teamed, would do for our
> offense???  We'd have one of the youngest and one of the best
> trio's in the NFL! (apologies to Skin's fans - NOT!).  They could
> have the potential of helping the Eagles for years and years and ...
> ... wild delusions of grandeur and ramblings of dynasties ...  :)
> 
> 	But seriously, why not?
>  

One sentence you say that you always have to be building for the future
and the very next sentence you want to trade away draft picks. Think
about that. Do you think that the Falcons are going to hand Rison over?
You don't get something for nothing, you know, and the EAGLES are deep
enough at WR that they don't *need* Rison. Maybe improve the 3rd or 4th
WR's, but go after Rison? No way. You can't only think about what you
are trying to get from a trade, you also have to consider what you are
willing to give up. The EAGLES would be nuts to give up what they'd have
to give up to get him.

pete clark jr.
att!hos1cad!seth
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: STEELERS ARE OVERRATED!
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:14:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: macc.1992Sep29.172249.17038
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

In article <28SEP92.22341501@vax.clarku.edu>, htilney@vax.clarku.edu writes...

>I saw the review of the game posted (thanks to the Packer fan), but I was
>very surprised by the stats in my paper. O'Donnell had 41 attempted passes??
>Why the heck was he throwing so much if Foster was having such a good day
>(12 carries for 117 yards)? I realize Foster's numbers may have resulted from
>one or two big gainers, but 41 attempts is an awful lot for this offense.

69 of Foster's yards were on one play.  Let's see... that would have 
left him 11 for 48 (4.4 ave) - still pretty good but it's not like he 
was shredding the Packer defense for 1st downs every run.  They were 
14 points behind for most of the 2nd half.  You throw alot when you're 
playing catchup.

>Pittsburgh outgained GB in both passing and rushing, and only turned the ball
>over once (a fumble). But the Packers had the ball almost twice as long, and
>I assume that Sharpe's 2 receptions for 93 yards had alot to do with the
>result. The teams were about even in penalties. 
> 
>GB may be a much better team with Favre, but the Steelers might have been 
>a bit overconfident. With an extra week to consider the loss, hopefully
>they'll come back even tough.

The game was pretty even.  14 points isn't that much by today's 
standards.  Still, the Packers were pretty much in control.  The 
yardage stats are going to be skewed by the fact that the Packers 
played *very* conservatively in the 2nd half.  With a 14 point lead 
and a QB making his 1st NFL start against the team leading the league 
in INTs you'd expect that.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Ooo I'm hurt
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 15:57:29 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Oct02.191235.3008@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>, chris@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM () writes:
> In article <1992Oct2.095840.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>>
>>    For Chips fans: Your Universe is a tiny bubble outside the realm
>>of reality. By the way, what color is the sky in your world? Do people
>>still use the sears catalog for toilet paper up there? Are you all using
>>your chips for your fire place or are you smoking them in your pipe? Hey,
>>were your parents related BEFORE they got married? Just kidding.
>>
>>
>>                        -doug THE dolfan-
> 
>    To doug the DOLL-FAN;
> 
>     Loiusville.edu.......now that's an oxymoron!            

              Well, at least I'm educated enough to know how to spell.
              So, I guess you're just a plain old moron.

                 -doug THE (Happy with my (oxy?)education) dolfan-

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lej@pdn.paradyne.com (Leo James)
Subject: Re: 49ers Schedule
Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 21:50:39 GMT

In article <1a0n14INNn06@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright) writes:
>
>In article <holly.227@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com> holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com (Holly Wise) writes:
>|HOME GAMES:                            AWAY GAMES:
>|
>|Oct 4 - 1:00 p.m. PST - Rams           Sept. 27 - 5:00 p.m. PST - Saints
>|Oct 18- 1:00 p.m. PST - Falcons        Oct. 11  -10:00 p.m. PST - Patriots 
>|Nov 15- 1:00 p.m. PST - Saints         Nov. 1   - 1:00 p.m. PST - Cardinals
>|Nov 29- 1:00 p.m. PST - Eagles         Nov. 9   - 6:00 p.m. PST - Falcons
>|Dec 6 - 1:00 p.m. PST - Dolphins       Nov. 22  - 1:00 p.m. PST - Rams
>|Dec 19- 1:00 p.m. PST - Buccaneers     Dec. 13  -10:00 a.m. PST - Vikings
>|Dec 28- 6:00 p.m. PST - Lions
>|-----
>|holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com
>
>Well, what do niners fans think of this? It seems like a relatively
>easy  schedule. They could loose to the Eagles and one of either the
>Saints or the Falcons and still make the playoffs, it seems to me.
>That all seems somewhat reasonable.
>
Look,  the Dolphins are no pushovers and if you continue to ignore
what's happening in the NFC Central, I promise you,  there will be
surprises ahead. Niner fans, if no one else, should appreciate the
quality of the NFC Central's  three  new head coaches;  Sam Wyche, 
Dennis Green, and Mike Holmgren; all of whom are former Bill Walsh
guys.
--
+---------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
|Leopold E. James     | "A heart, a soul, AND | AT&T Paradyne         |
|ph: (813) 530-8425   |  a mind are terrible  | P.O. Box 2826, LG-132,|
|lej@pdn.paradyne.com |  things to waste."    | Largo, FL 34649 (USA) |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: The Miami UV Rays
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 12:40:14 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

> (BTW, invoking the same logic you used to rename the Bills the
> 'Buffalo Broncos', I propose we start calling your team the 
> 'Miami Browns'.)
> 
> :-)
> 
> Mike 
              Uh....you lost me there friend. I can see the humor in 
associating the Bills with the Broncos, but where is the corralation
between the Dolphins and the Browns? Unless you're talking about the
sun tans on some of the Miami players. Great football humor!

                          -doug THE dolfan-