HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lmg@natinst.com (Louis Gomes)
Subject: Re: Takes a ticking and keeps on licking
Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 14:15:03 GMT

In article <1144@xlnt.COM> larry@xlnt.com writes:
>In article <1992Aug11.230758.5828@natinst.com>, lmg@natinst.com (Louis Gomes) writes:
>|> It is "disease" not "desease", seems like this is becoming rather
>|> circular, wouldn't you say?
>|> --
>|> louis
>
>I kind of like desease better. It's more in line the Our Boy's style.
>Or maybe it should be deseese ;) ?

eeeeeee ee eeeeee eeee eeeeeee ee eeaylisme, eeee ee eee eeeee?
--
louis
From: jdooley@maemaster.eng.uci.edu (John R. Dooley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle for President
Date: 13 Aug 92 16:59:32 GMT
Organization: University of California, Irvine

In article <1992Aug12.201724.1022@panix.com> eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug5.151057.6964@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
>>pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes:
>>
>>> Doesn't the credit for this particular boner go to Earl Butz, Gerald Ford's
>>> Secretary of Agriculture 
>
>Nope, Butz was Carter's AgSec.
>

No, definitely Gerald Ford's.  As I recall, he told his infamous joke
to a neighbor on a press plane and (if memory serves) John Dean (yes,
the John Dean of the White House tapes fame) disclosed it in an article.
(I may be mistaken about who first revealed the joke -- it may have
been Woodward or Bernstein, but Dean really sticks in my mind.)


John D.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams)
Subject: Re: Content-free Discourse (was Re: FAQ: The Record Thing)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 14:05:45 GMT
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

From article <1992Aug19.125158.20113@athena.mit.edu>, by dks@athena.mit.edu (dks):
> Really, is it so much to ask that statements have meanings,
> that argument be reasoned, that debate be civilized?  What is so
> scary about a conflict of ideas that you end up slinging mud instead
> of projecting thought?  Why do you have to resort to standards of
> rhetoric that most of us outgrew in kindergarten?
> 
> 
Other than the fact that can be amusing and fun from time to time, I can't
really think why. I will grant that there has been some drunken raving
going on in this group lately, and I've been responsible for some of it.

But one thing.  I answered one of the Pro-Life posts with a careful
and thoughtful response (thoughtful except for the crack about holding
funerals for bloody tampons) that provoked no reaction or debate.
Then I started shouting obscenities and calling people Butthead, and I
got mail from people thanking me.  So go figure.

As near as I can figure the conservatives who post here are mostly
lurkers.  They post their tidy little jeremiads and then refuse to
follow up the responses they generate.  Maybe they regard this
newsgroup as an anthill they can kick to see the ants scurry.


Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:2458 alt.slack:2284 talk.bizarre:25929
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.slack,talk.bizarre
Subject: Dan Quayle
Date: 14 Aug 92 13:18:02 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Virginia


DAN QUAYLE IS THE ANTI-ELVIS!!!

REPENT
REPENT
REPENT
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:2413 alt.politics.bush:1364 alt.politics.clinton:1809
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: The Republicans are confusing me again...
Date: 13 Aug 92 15:24:38 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <7+=yptg@rpi.edu> blythes@cs.rpi.edu (Stephen Blythe) writes:
>In article <1992Aug13.034255.3899@athena.mit.edu>, dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
>|> It's happening again: Republican logic is once more too much for my
>|> feeble mind.  
>
>Republican Logic ?????
>
>Can you say PARADOX ??? 

More likely, oxymoronic with regard to the Republicans.  With the
emphasis on the latter part of the word.


--
This is not a .signature
From: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle for President
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:54:07 GMT
Reply-To: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
In-reply-to: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)

In article <1992Aug16.051131.19162@u.washington.edu>, cortez@milton (Tom Warner) writes:
>>Pat Boone was one of the people present when Butz told his (in)famous
>>joke. I believe it was during a campaign plane trip for President Ford.

>Alright already!!!!! What was the joke?

It was something about what black people really want: loose women, tight
shoes, and warm bathroom seats.  Or something like that.  It wasn't even
funny, unlike the joke that got Watt fired.
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu) "[George Bush] is a man
 who was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple." --Jim Hightower
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: slarsen@beethoven.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen)
Subject: Re: The CULTURAL ELITE
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 18:25:06 GMT

In article <1992Aug17.194453.19410@sco.COM> erics@sco.COM (eric smith) writes:
>
>petersob@uwec.edu (Brent Peterson) writes:
>
>>I think in the context of Dan Qualye's original Family Values speech, it 
>                               !!!!!!
>>means the movie-makers, journalists, and network news anchors.  Qualye's 
>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^
>>point was that these Elitists are influencing rather than reflecting what is 
>>really happening in society.  
>

Sounds like Dan is disclaiming his family roots.  The money from which
Danny springs is the Pulliam family, who made their bucks by 
running a very successful string of newspapers, one of which was a daily 
in Indianapolis, if memory serves me correctly!

Sue Larsen
slarsen@berlin.helios.nd.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Low Wattage (was Re: Quayle for President)
From: cdillon@ecst.csuchico.edu (Charles (Tarzan) Dillon)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 04:07:30 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
Keywords: wrong element

In article <1992Aug21.151049.2478@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes:
>Eric Smith writes:
>
>>So what was the joke that got Watt fired? (Besides himself,
>>I mean).
>
>Criticizing the Beach Boys almost did it (this really seemed to tick off
>the Reagans, especially Nancy...boy, did they have their priorities in
>order, or what?)...but what finally got him canned was a remark not intended

But you have to remember, the Beach Boys on the lawn next to the Washington
Monument would attract the "wrong element". ;-)

[does "wrong element" sorta imply !(family values) ? ]

JW and the administration at the time tried to laugh it off by use of the
"Shot myself in the foot award"  I personally (still) wish it was the
"shot myself in the head award".

>as a joke.  It was the incident in which he was defending his record in hiring
>minorities for the Interior Department, ending with the immortal words
>"a black, two Jews and a cripple.  And we've got talent."
>
>- Patrick Walsh
>  University of Virginia Department of Physics
>  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu


-- 
If you understand, things are just as they are.        |               Charles
If you do not understand, things are just as they are. |               Dillon
	Zen Buddhist saying                            |        Some disclimer
						       |        should go here.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: d89-jsp@nada.kth.se (Arthur Sparrendahl)
Subject: Re: "This will not stand!"
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 04:42:13 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.143130.28935@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>, bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker) writes:
|> In article <1992Aug10.213729.7336@kth.se> d89-jsp@nada.kth.se (Jan Sparrendahl) writes:
|> >In article <czwm2bj.raj@netcom.com>, raj@netcom.com (Roger Lee) writes:
|> >|> The shameful thing is that I have the feeling that he WON'T get off his fat
|> >Still there is a lot
|> >to do (in terms of bombings) that would not cost that much but that
|> >would ease the pressure on civilians
|> BOMBINGS TO EASE THE PRESSURE ON CIVILIANS!!?!?!?!?!
|> what an interesting idea. Lets not bother sending relief
|> supplies,lets not bother trying to broker a negotiated solution,

Well of course it sounds queer but still...
I do not think it could replace negotiation. I based my statement on
that a lot of the pressure on civilians is caused by artillery bombardement.
Some of this is mortars but a lot is howitzers. It is costly to supply 
artillery. A fireing howitzer batallion use about 4 tons of ammunition per
minute. The republik of Serbia must have re-supplied the serbian militias
frequently. The only way to do this in that sqale is by railway. (Bomb
railways on the Sebian-Bosnian border) They will soon run out of pre-war
supply for heavy guns. (bomb the factory) The leadarship is dependent on
the Belgrad population believing the war can be kept from Belgrad. (Knock
out there SAMs with convincing ease) Oil suppies are used by the militias 
and is still shipped up the Danube. (Bomb the terminals) There are large 
domestic sources of oil. (guess what you could do) A larger engagement
would be to use helicopters to knock out single artillery pieces along 
the Mostar road and deploy some local puppets there to secure the road
to Sarajevo. Just what I suggested would take at least a month.

This will NOT solve any problems if they are not very lucky and cause a
revolution in Belgrad. The terrain is such that air power isn't as 
desicive as in a dessert. To passify the region would requier substantial
effort. That wouldn't solve the problem either. In the war in Croatia it
was obvious that it was the rest-Yugoslavian superiority that fueled the
conflict. That isn't the case in Bosnia-Hertzegovina. Therefor I do NOT
believe that bombing could solve the problem. If the world had acted in
Croatia, the Yougoslavia might have limited their efforts. 
Now it's too late.

As long as it goes BANG....
Arthur
From: rone@alcor.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Quayle's numbers trouble GOP
Date: 16 Aug 1992 14:50:33 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: alcor.usc.edu
Keywords: usa federal, government, politics

culled from clari.news.top. copyrighted material, all rights reserved.

=====
	A CBS poll taken at about the same time showed that even among
Republicans, Democratic vice presidential nominee Al Gore is seen more
favorably than Quayle, 47 percent to 44 percent.
	A Harris poll found that 75 percent believe Quayle is simply not
qualifed to be a heart beat from the presidency.
	In light of that, consider this, too.
	At 68, George Bush is the sixth oldest person ever to serve in the
Oval Office. According to national health statistics, 12 percent of
American white males the president's age will die within four years.
	That means if Bush is reelected, chances are nearly one in eight
Quayle would have to finish his second term.
=====

5150
if you didn't notice, the odds of 'crapping out' in a game of craps is 8 to 1
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: petersob@uwec.edu (Brent Peterson)
Subject: Re: The CULTURAL ELITE
Organization: Univ of Wisc - Eau Claire
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 00:29:00 GMT
X-Posted-From: access-111.telecomm.umn.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Aug11.183345.5342@cs.mun.ca> paulk@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Paul E. King) writes:
>From: paulk@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Paul E. King)
>Subject: Re: The CULTURAL ELITE
>Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 18:33:45 GMT

>mitch@lsil.com (Mitch Sako) writes:

>OK, I heard Quayl refuse to answer Jim Lehrer a few months back regarding 
the
>question, "What exactly do you (quayl) mean by The Cultural Elite?"
>I thought at the time that Quayl refused to answer because he didn't know
>what it meant.  He also said that if we wait and see, we will know what it
>is.  I've seen people suggest that it means everything from Jews and 
>Jewishness to AIDS activism.

I think in the context of Dan Qualye's original Family Values speech, it 
means the movie-makers, journalists, and network news anchors.  Qualye's 
point was that these Elitists are influencing rather than reflecting what is 
really happening in society.  This is evident today by looking at how the 
media blatantly accepts the democrats while shunning all the republican 
politicians.  Hollywood also makes the inner city's seem like warzones and 
depicts men sleeping around on their wifes as normal.  

Brent Peterson
petersob@uwec.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Speech?
Reply-To: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 18:08:44 GMT


In a previous article, danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) says:

>In article <SES.92Aug21074710@cmns-sun.think.com>, ses@cmns-sun.think.com (Simon
>Edward Spero) writes:
>> In article <1992Aug21.044036.1475@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu
>(Bradley S. Corsello) writes:
>>    Maybe he's referring to Quayl's Vietname adventures.  They made a movie
>>    about them, you know:  "Thirty Seconds over Indianapolis".
>> 
>> No, no, no- you're thinking of "Full dinner jacket".
>>
>
>   I thought it was "Buffoon"?

No, I was wrong - it was called "Good Moron, Vietnam!"

-- 
Brad Corsello (bsc7@po.cwru.edu) 2L Case Western Reserve Law School
"The Fanaticks have always had a way of affecting to run into Per-
secution, and count vast Merit upon every little Hardship they suffer."
^ J. Swift.  "Factum clarum, jus nebulosum."  Rex v. Haddock.
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: ABORTION
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:24:31 GMT
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

In article <1992Aug18.131746@IASTATE.EDU>,
danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) writes:
>   I agree it would be nice to leave this particular issue out of
>alt.fan.dan-quayle, except possibly when Qauyl himself says something.


Don't you think it's also acceptable to discuss the question
of whether the foetal Dannikins *should* have been aborted?

I mean as a hypothetical, of course.


Dhanesh

Baker-Bush/Quayl in '92:
One Mind, Three Skulls.
From: dfriedman@misvax.mis.arizona.edu (D R Friedman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: A supporter of Dan Quayle
Keywords: yep its true
Date: 14 Aug 92 18:06:00 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona MIS Department
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Yesterday, I saw a person standing in front of the Republican party HQ who
by his sign could be lobbying for Dan to be VP. His sign:

Dan Quayle:  I'll be vice president for food.

What a great campaign slogan for a true son of a cultural elite family.

Denny 
-------------------------------------

my .sig is broken 
Organization: Senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 20:39:40 -0400 
From: Nanci Ann Miller <nm0w+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: On family

Dan on family:

   "Don't forget about the importance of the family. It begins with the
family.  We're not going to redefine the family. Everybody knows the
definition of the family. ... A child. ... A mother. ... A father. There
are other arrangements of the family, but that is a family and family
values.
   "I've been very blessed with wonderful parents and a wonderful family,
and I am proud of my family. Anybody turns to their family. I have a very
good family. I'm very fortunate to have a very good family. I believe very
strongly in the family. It's one of the things we have in our platform, is
to talk about it.
   "I suppose three important things certainly come to my mind that we want
to say thank you. The first would be our family. Your family, my family --
which is composed of an immediate family of a wife and three children, a
larger family with grandparents and aunts and uncles. We all have our
family, whichever that may be... The very beginnings of civilization, the
very beginnings of this country, goes back to the family. And time and time
again, I'm often reminded, especially in this Presidential campaign, of the
importance of a family, and what a family means to this country. And so
when you pay thanks I suppose the first thing that would come to mind would
be to thank the Lord for the family."
-- Vice President Dan Quayle
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker)
Subject: PLEASE MOVE ABORTION DISCUSSION ELSEWHERE THANKYOU
Organization: Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, McMaster University
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 13:07:41 GMT


There are special newsgroups devoted to the discussion of the abortion issue.
the Dan quayle fan culb is not one of them. unless the article  pertains to
The Danster, or even King Bushes views on Abortion(with some mention of our
man)please post it elsewhere. 

on another note: Isn't the republican convention amazing! It is as if
these guys live in a different reality with different problems. While
the Demos have become quite opportunistically center-rightist they still
seem to actually talk about issues in the real world. How did
this looney right fringe party grab hold of power in such a large
advanced nation I really do not know! There is really nothing to
compare it to on the rest of the planet.

ALEX
From: alexo+@cs.cmu.edu (Alex Orenshteyn)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Anti-heroes.
Date: 14 Aug 92 22:20:39 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon


	It was hot, could not work, so I thought. Captain Planet of 
the Turner/Fonda domain is having an easy time defeating his mild-
mannered villains and scoundrels, so to make things livelier I dove
into the deep recesses of my soul to invent a new eco-bandit; and here
it is - Teenage Mutant Quayle Ninga(sp?). This one is not so easy, heh?
From: crittend@cs.unc.edu (bac)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Responses to Bush Massage at Convention
Date: 21 Aug 92 15:11:00 GMT
Reply-To: crittend@cs.unc.edu
Organization: Worldwide Pants Incorporated

In article <92234.001009JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu>, JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

|> 11)  "A rubber check Congress...."
|>                    -It wasn't until Republicans held the Executive
|>                     and the Senate that the United States went from
|>                     the greatest creditor nation on earth to the
|>                     greatest debtor nation.

i thought he was referring to the check-kiting scandal.  this was
hardly a democrat-only problem.  pretty much evenly split, i thought. 

|> 14)  Bush will give taxpayers a check box to dedicate income tax
|>      to the national debt.

this had better be a mighty big box to check.  currently the national
debt is just over $4trillion.  that's roughly $15,750 per american
citizen!  i don't think a check box is going to do much good here.
say every tax payer gives an extra dollar.  you get $200million.  BFD.

these check box funds would be in addition to your regular taxes, no?
i'm a mighty generous guy, but i'm not going to chunk in an extra
$15k.  don't know anyone who will.  and this is bush's "new idea"!

-- 
______________________________crittend@cs.unc.edu____________________________

I'm walking in here on my knees, Ed, a free man proposing.  Howdy Curt.
	     	--H.I. McDonough, Raising Arizona
_____________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: smj@iti.org (Seth Johnson)
Subject: Re: AN ANAGRAM!!! WE HAVE ONE!!!
Organization: Industrial Technology Institute
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:59:42 GMT

In article <16rkp5INNcg9@network.ucsd.edu> fledgist@weber.ucsd.edu (Fragano Ledgister) writes:
>In article <1992Aug18.144956.23709@nic.umass.edu> s5202734@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s5202734) writes:
>>    Many years ago, isaw the following anagram (I don't recall the source, so
>>no attribution):
>
>Dick Cavett.
>
>>
>>   Spiro Agnew <===> Grow a Penis
>>
>>  What is it with veeps & penises (penii?  penia?)
>>
>>     Jenny Gutbezahl
>>
>
>
>Do penes have veeps?
>-- 
>____________________________________________________________________
>Dawn over the dark sea brings on the sun;                      
>She leans across the hilltop: see, the light!
>--------------------------------------------------------------------

Gerald Ford <===> Geld a Dorf

So I dropped one letter...Sue Me!!!

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams)
Subject: Re: The paths of the master
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 15:01:51 GMT
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

From article <86369@netnews.upenn.edu>, by rsk@aspen.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec):
> In article <1992Aug17.190755.21723@javelin.sim.es.com> ronwill@sierra.sim.es.com (Ron Williams) writes:
>>Oh, and I take issue with you calling Indiana a barren, featureless paririe.

Listen bud, I live in Iowa.  I TELL people I live in a barren, featureless
prairie so they'll stay the hell away.  Just like the people in the Pacific
NorthWest will tell you it always rains.

Plus, Herbert Hoover was from Iowa.  And Dan Quayle is no Herbert Hoover.
From: Corby.E.Page@dartmouth.edu (Corby E. Page)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Speech?
Date: 20 Aug 92 22:24:56 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

In article <1992Aug20.204317.346@odin.corp.sgi.com>
lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford) writes:

> The announcer mentioned the "young people" in
> front of the podium several times.  Seems Marilyn brought her own 
> cheerleaders along

I've seen the people to which you refer. They look a lot like certain
rich white frat boys on this campus. In a discussion with journalists,
they explained that their job at the convention is to "stand at the
front and yell like hell."

> A few worthy of note, however:
> 
> "Not everyone ... took drugs, dodged the draft ..." She then stated that, unlike
> other baby-boomers, she and Dan believe in fidelity.  (As Jay Leno said,
> "well, two outta three ain't bad.") :-)

Which two did Jay mean? If we believe Brett Kimberlin, who is serving
something like triple his sentence right now for attempting to hold a
press conference, Danny smoked dope. The DEA has admitted that Danny
has been investigated on charges of buying cocaine, although we don't
know any details of the investigations except that they didn't result
in indictments. Danny's parents got him into the National Guard, which
seems like rich-boy draft-dodging to me. In '88, Danny denied to Dan
Rather that he had ever done the nasty with Paula Parkinson (sp?),
which would be just fine except for the fact that Dan Rather never
asked Dan Quayle about doing the nasty or Paula Parkinson.

corby
corby@dartmouth.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: linley@qucis.queensu.ca (Richard Linley)
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Speech?
Organization: Computing & Information Science, Queen's University at Kingston
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:33:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug21.180844.245@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello) writes:
>
>In a previous article, danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) says:
>
>>In article <SES.92Aug21074710@cmns-sun.think.com>, ses@cmns-sun.think.com (Simon
>>Edward Spero) writes:
>>> In article <1992Aug21.044036.1475@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu
>>(Bradley S. Corsello) writes:
>>>    Maybe he's referring to Quayl's Vietname adventures.  They made a movie
>>>    about them, you know:  "Thirty Seconds over Indianapolis".
>>> 
>>> No, no, no- you're thinking of "Full dinner jacket".
>>>
>>
>>   I thought it was "Buffoon"?
>
>No, I was wrong - it was called "Good Moron, Vietnam!"
>
>-- 
>Brad Corsello (bsc7@po.cwru.edu) 2L Case Western Reserve Law School
>"The Fanaticks have always had a way of affecting to run into Per-
>secution, and count vast Merit upon every little Hardship they suffer."
>^ J. Swift.  "Factum clarum, jus nebulosum."  Rex v. Haddock.

Let us not forget "Idianapolypse Now"!