HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman)
Subject: Re: AZT Resistance
Organization: Computer Science Department,  Stanford University.
Distribution: ca
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 02:52:39 GMT

>1) we now "know" (because we read it in the paper) that the AIDS virus
>   becomes resistant to AZT over time.  We didn't "know" this before
>   now

Actually, we did know that this sort of thing happens, because we've
seen it many times before.  It would be quite surprising if the AIDS
virus did not become AZT resistant; it is not surprising that AIDS is
becoming AZT resistant.  That's how things have worked since the dawn
of "modern medicine".  It's no secret either - the pattern gets a lot
of press every couple years and individual examples are reported far
more often.

We've always had problems with "magic bullets" (not that AZT
qualifies) becoming less effective.  We've seen it time and time again
because some people think that running around the "get reinfected -
take a pill" cycle is something other than a good way to breed
diseases that don't respond to treatment.  (Yes - running around that
cycle is better than "get infected - do nothing", but that's not
saying much.)  As far as virus' are concerned, it isn't as "effective"
as the "I'll take a low-level dose to make sure I don't get infected"
strategy but it's pretty good.

>   because I would hope that *most* people would be paranoid enough to
>   assume that the virus could become resistant, anyway.

Yeah right.  What was it that the author said about stupidity?

-andy


--
From: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Newsgroups: ca.politics
Subject: Re: AZT Resistance
Date: 8 Jan 93 21:16:40 GMT
Reply-To: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Distribution: ca
Organization: sgi
NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.mti.sgi.com

In article <43187@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>, jschell@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Gift Horse) writes:
|> In article <1ikb6eINNg7m@spim.mti.sgi.com> Jeff Dauber writes:


|> >People taking AZT do not automatically have an AZT immune strain.  Even
|> >people for who AZT is not longer effective do not necessarily have an
|> >AZT immune strain.  There is more out there than AZT; DDI, DDC, and D4T 
|> >as examples.  People who are taking and anti-viral have less HIV in their
|> >semen than people who are infected and not taking AZT.
|> 
|> It doesn't matter if they have an immune strain or not.  They still
|> know that they have AIDS.

First of all, being HIV+ does not mean that the person has AIDS.  Your 
grasp of the terminology is almost as firm as your grasp on the issues
associated with the illness.

|> They may or may not have less actual
|> virus pieces, and they may think that there's a less chance of their
|> partner getting AIDS because they're taking AZT, but there's still a
|> chance.  I can play Russian Roulette with 2 bullets in 6 chambers
|> (no AZT) or I can play with 1 bullet (taking AZT).  Either way
|> there's a chance of getting the bullet.  In addition, there's the
|> chance of getting an AZT immune strain (probably pretty low) and
|> spreading that around.  IMO, it's not worth the risk.

However, both people involved in the sex act are responsible for their
behavior.  You seem to be just "blaming" the person who is HIV+.




FWA
From: walsh@optilink.COM (Mark Walsh)
Newsgroups: ca.politics
Subject: Re: AZT Resistance
Date: 12 Jan 93 00:14:09 GMT
Distribution: ca
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA

From article <1ikb6eINNg7m@spim.mti.sgi.com>, by dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber):

> To respond to the "HIV in saliva" bullshit which was here earlier.  You
> need a vector for entry.  Touching something which contains HIV does not
> mean you will be infected, you do need a way to enter the bloodstream,
> and that does not exist in your mouth.

Jeff, while I have generally agreed with what you have said in
this thread, I am concerned about this statement.  It is foolish
to minimize the dangers of catching this disease, and one of the
proven points of entry is indeed the mouth, for we all have open
areas (fisures) in our mouths as the skin is particularly thin,
similar to that found in the anal cavities.

If you must stick things in your mouth, I would advise proper
protection first.  Please, please, please be safe.
-- 
Mark Walsh (walsh@optilink) -- UUCP: uunet!optilink!walsh
AOL: BigCookie -- Amateur Radio: KM6XU@WX3K -- USCF: L10861
"What, me worry?" - William M. Gaines, 1922-1992
From: chattend@csar.encore.com (Chuck Hattendorf)
Subject: Re: Caltech Earthquake Reports, December
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 18:09:09 GMT

Hi!
	I am employed with at the Naval Weapons Center (recently changed
to Naval Air Weapons Staion) in China Lake, Ca. on the south range also
known as Echo range. The site here is situated directly above the Garlock
fault. I have noticed earthquake monitors located in the area, and believe
the monitors are maintained by Cal Institute of Technology. I understand
that the monitors emit a certain frequency, and measure the frequency
shift or dithering to gauge an earthquake and transfer to the richter scale.
Is it possible I can have the frequencies used? I suspect they are in the
Low or Very low range! I would like to build my own monitor for home.
Any help on this subject would be greatly appreciated....Thanks!

*    Charlie Hattendorf       Realtime Computer support -       /|            *
* Technical Representative         While you wait!             /-|MIGA works. *
*  619-939-9252 NWC/ECRD    "Build a system any fool can use, and only a fool *
* internet: chattend@encore.com    would want to use it" Murphy's corollaries *
* views expressed are mine(d) alone.     "There's AU in 'dem 'thar hills..."  *
From: mas@porgy.jpl.nasa.gov (Marc A. Sarrel)
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
Subject: National Quake records???
Date: 6 Jan 93 00:40:31 GMT
Distribution: ca
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Is there a place (hopefully on the Net) that maintains a record of
quakes in the US?  I grew up in Connecticut and remember feeling a
pair of quakes in the Spring of '82 whose magnitude I'd be interested
in finding out.  From memory and experience living in LA these past
two years, I'd say they were about a 3.0 to 3.5, but I'd like to
check.

just curious...

--marc
From: Sean.Reigle@f203.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
Subject: Quake probabilities for S. California Quake increases
X-Sender: newtout 0.06 Jan  3 1993
Date: 09 Jan 93  15:09:01

Quoting a message which Bill Galcher wrote to All on Friday January 08 1993 at 
18:59:

 BG> ``Evidence for five large earthquakes during the past five centuries
along
 BG> the San Andreas fault zone...northeast of Los Angeles...indicates that
the
 BG> average recurrence interval...are significantly smaller than previously
 BG> thought,'' the scientists wrote in the journal Science. Since this
segment

Scientists are what, around a 40 year o
From: Sean.Reigle@f203.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
Subject: Quake probabilities for S. California Quake increases
X-Sender: newtout 0.06 Jan  3 1993
Date: 09 Jan 93 15:09:00

Quoting a message which Bill Galcher wrote to All on Friday January 08 1993 at 
18:59:

 BG> ``Evidence for five large earthquakes during the past five centuries
along
 BG> the San Andreas fault zone...northeast of Los Angeles...indicates that
the
 BG> average recurrence interval...are significantly smaller than previously
 BG> thought,'' the scientists wrote in the journal Science. Since this
segment

Scientists are what, around a 40 year old average in age? I would like to know 
how many of these seismologists actually have seen an earthquake every 5 years 
in their 40 year career? Feed that to their computers. <g>

Sean/Dezone - Sean.Reigle@f203.n103.z1.fidonet.org

--- GEcho 1.00
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
From: dwarner@ub-gate.ub.com (Dave Warner)
Subject: Re: Caltech Earthquake Reports, December
Organization: Ungermann-Bass
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 00:18:15 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.180909.9976@csar.encore.com> chattend@csar.encore.com (Chuck Hattendorf) writes:

>Hi!
>       I am employed with at the Naval Weapons Center (recently changed
[Deleted..]
>Is it possible I can have the frequencies used? I suspect they are in the
>Low or Very low range! I would like to build my own monitor for home.
>Any help on this subject would be greatly appreciated....Thanks!

Try posting a request to rec.radio.shortwave and alt.radio.scanner,
surely somebody is monitoring this....



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Warner (No DoD#)                    Opinions mine alone, unless
dwarner@ub-gate.UB.com                   otherwise stated.

"Gallows, n.  A stage for the performance of miracle plays, in which the
leading actor is translated to heaven.  In this country the gallows is
chiefly remarkable for the number of persons who escape it". - A. Bierce
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
From: stgprao@st.unocal.COM (Richard Ottolini)
Subject: Re: Caltech Earthquake Reports, December
Organization: Unocal Corporation
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 21:40:31 GMT

In article <1993Jan6.172651.22994@csar.encore.com> chattend@csar.encore.com (Chuck Hattendorf) writes:
> The triangulation method would apparently not only give accurate location
>and strength of a given occurrence, but allow erroneous data to be discarded.
>I would imagine that noise from passing tractor-trailers could be a problem.

Seismologists have many techniques to address these problems.  The first is to avoid recording
"noise" in the first place by placing sensors in isolated places, coupling well to the group,
and designing the sensors to record waves coming from below than along the side.
Cultural noise often has higher frequency than seismic motion, so data can be frequency filtered.

It is also a little more complicated than triangulation.  There are FOUR unknowns- three spatial
coordinates and the origin time of the quake.  Triangulation makes assumptions about z and t.
Also the varying velocity of rocks distorts the geometry of the triangle. (It wasn't that long
ago that people would argue whether a quake had occurred on the San Andreas or a side fault
because of using too simple velocity models of rocks.) Also, it is not entirely clear when a
quake has started on some seismograms, i.e. the picking problem.  But don't despair.  The full
arsenal of mathematical physics and signal processing has been applied to the problem with
good success. I would enumerate the answers here, but it takes several years of school to learn
them.
Xref: sparky ca.earthquakes:1522 sci.geo.geology:2659
From: stead@skadi.CSS.GOV (Richard Stead)
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
Subject: Re: National Quake records???
Date: 6 Jan 93 00:59:49 GMT
Distribution: ca

In article <MAS.93Jan5164031@porgy.jpl.nasa.gov>, mas@porgy.jpl.nasa.gov (Marc A. Sarrel) writes:
> Is there a place (hopefully on the Net) that maintains a record of
> quakes in the US?  I grew up in Connecticut and remember feeling a

Don't know of one off-hand, but I can check our database.

> pair of quakes in the Spring of '82 whose magnitude I'd be interested
> in finding out.  From memory and experience living in LA these past
> two years, I'd say they were about a 3.0 to 3.5, but I'd like to

From the first 9 months of 1982, near CT (lat 40 to 50, lon -80 to -70):

   lat             lon                time                  mb
  43.5000	 -71.6000	1/19/82 00:14:42.0	   4.5
  43.5300	 -71.6100	1/27/82 16:43:14.5	    -
  41.8700	 -70.9700	1/27/82 18:50:05.1	    -
  40.2100	 -79.0500	2/ 3/82 04:28:20.6	    -
  43.5100	 -71.6400	3/12/82 22:04:18.4	    -
  40.0240	 -74.8130	4/12/82 22:14:31.0	    -
  41.5210	 -72.4400	6/17/82 08:02:38.6	    -
  41.5180	 -72.4410	6/17/82 14:14:20.5	    -
  41.5080	 -72.3770	6/17/82 14:14:35.9	    -
  41.5080	 -72.4370	6/17/82 15:29:24.4	    -
  46.0300	 -74.5500	7/13/82 02:18:49.0	    -
  45.8900	 -75.4600	8/ 6/82 06:29:10.0	    -
  46.6900	 -78.4600	8/13/82 01:06:41.0	   3.7
  43.2090	 -74.2000	8/31/82 10:16:58.1	    -

If we don't have the mb, it probably wasn't reported (meaning it was probably
small, but no guarantee).  The M4.7 was very close to CT.


--
Richard Stead
Center for Seismic Studies
Arlington, VA
stead@seismo.css.gov
From: chattend@csar.encore.com (Chuck Hattendorf)
Subject: Re: Caltech Earthquake Reports, December
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:26:51 GMT

stead@skadi.CSS.GOV (Richard Stead) writes:

>"gauging" an earthquake involves measuring the amplitude of the ground motion,
>and correcting it for the distance to the earthquake.  Note that you cannot
>do that without knowing the distance to the quake, and an ordinary vertical
>seismometer typical of the Caltech network (and networks in general) cannot
>do that alone.  You need 3 separate stations and a computer to determine
>the location of the event - then you can get the distance, and finally
>correct the amplitude to get the Richter magnitude.  (Actually, Caltech
>reports only coda duration magnitudes for most events - these are determined
>from the time decay of the vibration, also corrected for distance.  These
>magnitudes have been defined so that they match Richter magnitudes in an
>average sense for earthquakes where both magnitudes can be computed.)

 The triangulation method would apparently not only give accurate location
and strength of a given occurrence, but allow erroneous data to be discarded.
I would imagine that noise from passing tractor-trailers could be a problem.

>I think there are several amateur radio operators who do this with some
>of the Caltech stations.  Caltech probably does not publish the frequencies
>in an effort to avoid interference that any other broadcasting at those
>frequencies might cause.  Maybe one of the radio folks that read this
>group could help you.


>--
>Richard Stead
>Center for Seismic Studies
>Arlington, VA
>stead@seismo.css.go

Thanks much for all the the information, I'm on to a .radio newsgroup


*    Charlie Hattendorf       Realtime Computer support -       /|            *
* Technical Representative         While you wait!             /-|MIGA works. *
*  619-939-9252 NWC/ECRD    "Build a system any fool can use, and only a fool *
* internet: chattend@encore.com    would want to use it" Murphy's corollaries *
* views expressed are mine(d) alone.     "There's AU in 'dem 'thar hills..."  *
!
From: mccallen1@llnl.gov (mccallen)
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
Subject: gif maps
Date: 7 Jan 93 20:44:36 GMT
Distribution: ca.earthquakes
Organization: lawrence livermore national lab

Is there an FTP site where I can obtain Petrolia earthquake hypocenter
location gif maps?

thanks!

D.McCallen
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
From: fretts@willee.enet.dec.com (Carole Fretts)
Subject: Cross-Post from clari.news.disaster re:new prediction
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 13:46:12 GMT


******

Article: 4585
Xref: nntpd2.cxo.dec.com clari.tw.science:3884 clari.news.disaster:4585 clari.local.sfbay:1280 clari.local.california:5153 clari.news.top:17415
From: stead@skadi.CSS.GOV (Richard Stead)
Newsgroups: ca.earthquakes
Subject: Re: Caltech Earthquake Reports, December
Date: 5 Jan 93 23:13:27 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.180909.9976@csar.encore.com>, chattend@csar.encore.com (Chuck Hattendorf) writes:
> known as Echo range. The site here is situated directly above the Garlock
> fault. I have noticed earthquake monitors located in the area, and believe
> the monitors are maintained by Cal Institute of Technology. I understand

Yup, Caltech has a station there in cooperation with the weapons center.

> that the monitors emit a certain frequency, and measure the frequency
> shift or dithering to gauge an earthquake and transfer to the richter scale.

A little bit of the cart before the horse there.  The "monitors" are
seismometers - they measure ground motion through essentially a "mass on
a spring" mechanism, and sense this motion by causing the mass to move
a magnet through a coil (or vice-versa), generating a small current.
The voltage from the seismometer is run through a VCO (voltage-controlled
oscillator) to produce an FM signal for transmitting the data.  The FM
is then transmitted to Caltech (a variety of methods are used:  radio,
microwave, phone line, etc.) where it is converted back to a voltage,
digitized and then processed by computers to look for events.

So the station does emit a certain frequency - this is the carrier for the
FM signal - but it is purely for transmitting the data, it does not sense
earthquakes itself.  The frequency shift is simply the FM representation
of the data - same way an FM radio station works.

"gauging" an earthquake involves measuring the amplitude of the ground motion,
and correcting it for the distance to the earthquake.  Note that you cannot
do that without knowing the distance to the quake, and an ordinary vertical
seismometer typical of the Caltech network (and networks in general) cannot
do that alone.  You need 3 separate stations and a computer to determine
the location of the event - then you can get the distance, and finally
correct the amplitude to get the Richter magnitude.  (Actually, Caltech
reports only coda duration magnitudes for most events - these are determined
from the time decay of the vibration, also corrected for distance.  These
magnitudes have been defined so that they match Richter magnitudes in an
average sense for earthquakes where both magnitudes can be computed.)

> Is it possible I can have the frequencies used? I suspect they are in the
> Low or Very low range! I would like to build my own monitor for home.
> Any help on this subject would be greatly appreciated....Thanks!

I think there are several amateur radio operators who do this with some
of the Caltech stations.  Caltech probably does not publish the frequencies
in an effort to avoid interference that any other broadcasting at those
frequencies might cause.  Maybe one of the radio folks that read this
group could help you.


--
Richard Stead
Center for Seismic Studies
Arlington, VA
stead@seismo.css.gov
Newsgroups: ca.wanted,ba.market.misc
From: sap@lucid.com (Synthia Petroka)
Subject: Gameboy Chessmaster game wanted
Organization: Lucid, Inc., Menlo Park CA
Distribution: ca
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 01:56:16 GMT

Hi,

I've been searching for months for a Chessmaster game for my Gameboy and every
store that I've tried is out and will not special order.  I've tried Toys-R-Us,
Fry's, Target, Best, and K-Mart. I'd be interested in buying your used
cartridge, any leads to another store where you've seen it, or maybe we can
work something out where you could pick it up for me if the store is out of my
area.

Thanks.
-Synthia
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
From: roman.yarish@rose.com (roman yarish)
Subject: Telescope Wanted
Organization: Rose Media Inc, Toronto, Ontario.
Distribution: ca
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:19:40 GMT
X-Gated-By: Usenet <==> RoseMail Gateway (v1.70)


Date Entered: 01-08-93 10:12

Wanted telescope: prefer "schmit-cassegrain" type 
something like the ones made by "Meade" or "Celestron"
however will consider others.

roman.yarish@rose.com
---
   RoseReader 1.70 P002254: Please dial right now.  We have operators waiting...
   RoseMail 2.00 : RoseNet<=>Usenet Gateway : Rose Media 416-733-2285
From: tsang@futon.SFSU.EDU (Joanna Tsang)
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
Subject: Any Mark Thompson fans out there...
Keywords: KTTV, KRON, weathermen, Mark, Thompson
Date: 7 Jan 93 01:07:16 GMT
Distribution: ca
Organization: San Francisco State University

Hi, netters!

	I was/am a big fan of Mark Thompson (the weatherman) back when he
was working for KRON in San Francisco.  About 2 years ago, he has moved on
to KTTV in Los Angeles.  I miss watching his smiling face and was wondering if
anyone in LA can please send me a VHS tape of one of his more interesting
broadcast at his current news station.

	BTW: If anyone out there actually *knows* the guy, would you please
pass the word that I said hi from SF and miss him terribly.  He knows who
I am.

	Thanks a lot.

							-Joanna Tsang
-- 
Joanna Tsang						tsang@futon.sfsu.edu
San Francisco State University				tsang@toaster.sfsu.edu

This mesage will self-destruct in...*BOOM!*...five seconds.
From: Yoshio.Nakamura@f851.n102.z1.fidonet.org (Yoshio Nakamura)
Sender: NewsMeisterII@mcws.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
Subject: Looking for Technical Bookstore
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 18:21:54 -0800

OpAmp Technical Books, Inc.
1033 N. Sycamore Ave., Los Angeles, CA  90038
213-464-4322  800-468-4322
One block east of La Brea, Half block so. of Santa Monica Blvd.
Great store!
 
Technical Book Co.
2056 Westwood Blvd., L.A., CA 90025
213-475-5711
Near Santa Monica Blvd. and Westwood Blvd.
 
-yoshio    yoshio@pain.la.ca.us

 * Origin: Central Computer Banks - mcws.fidonet.org (1:102/851)
From: barson@devl.fnal.gov
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
Subject: WANTED: SAN DIEGO INFO!!
Date: 11 Jan 93 15:56:26 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
NNTP-Posting-Host: devl.fnal.gov

I'm an Electronics Tech finishing up my BS in Computer Science. I'm VERY
interested in getting out of the Midwest and moving to the San Diego area.
I'm looking for a way to get leads on related businesses in the area, and also
some way to gauge the types of neighborhoods surrounding San Diego. A quality
environment (i.e. people, not money) is important to me and my family.
Any information would be greatly appreciated!
Replies can be sent to me @:
	
	BARSON@FNAL.GOV

			or

	KEVIN BARSON
	FERMILAB
	P.O. BOX 500   M.S. 307
	BATAVIA, IL    60540
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
From: jvinson@xsoft.xerox.com (Jeffrey A Vinson)
Subject: WANTED:  airline ticket to LV from Bay area for CES show!!
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 09:51:04 PST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA10582; Mon, 4 Jan 93 09:52:13 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA29063; Mon, 4 Jan 93 09:52:12 -0800
X-Received: from xsoft.xerox.com ([13.242.72.2]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <11582>; Mon, 4 Jan 1993 09:51:10 PST
X-Received: from aerie ([13.242.56.32]) by xsoft.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA26262; Mon, 4 Jan 93 09:51:07 PST
X-Received: by aerie (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA06698; Mon, 4 Jan 93 09:51:04 PST
X-To: ca.wanted.usenet
X-Cc: jvinson@xsoft.xerox.com


Anybody have one cheap??

Let me know,
Jeff Vinson
vinson@migration.com
415.813.7492

PS:  preferably in a female's name...
Newsgroups: ca.wanted,ucla.forsale
From: coleman@twinsun.com (Mike Coleman)
Subject: WANTED: Imported Pickup <$5K
Organization: Twin Sun Inc, El Segundo, CA, USA
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.4.19
Distribution: la
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 21:53:23 GMT

I'm looking to buy a used import (i.e. Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Mazda)
pickup truck for under $5000.  Appearance is unimportant, but it must be in
good mechanical working order.

Reply by email, or leave a phone message at (310) 202-8499.

Thanks.
From: canopus@Apple.COM (Frank Dibbell)
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
Subject: Car for sale
Keywords: nissan maxima
Date: 7 Jan 93 17:44:30 GMT
Distribution: ba
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

(Posted for a friend)

For sale:  Nissan Maxima (1990)
Model GXE, Burgundy color, 47K miles, excellent condition,
auto transmission, power steering, power brakes, power windows,
power door locks, air conditioning.

Asking $11,500.  

Call (408) 554-1866, ask for Don.
From: jww@calmasd.prime.com
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
Subject: *FREE* Refrigerator......
Date: 4 Jan 93 21:11:39 GMT
Distribution: ca
Organization: Computervision, San Diego CA

Free Refrigerator.......

18 cu ft, beige in color, not sure on the make.
It runs fine, makes some funny noises, good garage
frig.

This beauty is located in San Diego, Oceanside to be exact.

Call 619-587-3184 or reply via mail.

-jeff
From: bstarr@bonnie.ics.uci.edu (Brian Joseph Starr)
Subject: Electronic Keyboard/Synthesisor wanted
Newsgroups: ca.wanted
Organization: UC Irvine Department of ICS
Date: 12 Jan 93 13:34:57 GMT
Distribution: ca

Hi.  I'm in the market for a good, low cost keyboard with Midi and Velocity
Sensistivity; for example, a Yamaha 300.  Must be free of defects (except for
minor cosmetic).

Please contact me by E-Mail (bstarr@ics.uci.edu).  Thanks.

Brian