HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: richarr@bullet.ecf (RICHARDSON  ROBBIE)
Newsgroups: alt.mcdonalds
Subject: McFelching
Date: 16 Apr 92 16:57:34 GMT
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Originator: richarr@bullet.ecf.toronto.edu


 I just tried some McPizza and I LIKE it! I mean it's NOT gourmet, but I
think it tastes relatively close to a Pizza Hut Personal Pan Pizza! Maybe
because it's Mcdonald's everybody thinks that it SUCKS. I mean I wouldn't
consider it a healthy part of my diet but I HAVE eaten worse...Dominoes
for instance...DOMINOES DOES SUCK SHIT!!! They tried to make it big in
Toronto and got shafted...Pizza Pizza shut 'em down.

 The only drawback I see is those BLOODY Mcdonald's adds!! You'd have to be
blind, deaf and stupid to not know about McPizza by now. I mean come on I've
heard of overkill before but this is a TAD bit ridiculous.

 As for the rest of the McFude at McD's I wouldn't feed it to my kids if they
were starving in the streets (I'd keep it for myself and let them shrivel up
into something that looks like beef jerky!)


-=*>robb

"Happier than a hooker who finds out she's the only one working Melrose Ave.
on a Saturday night!!!"
Newsgroups: alt.mcdonalds
From: zippy@cs.mcgill.ca (Fotis XIPOLITAKIS)
Subject: Re: Ronald McCock
Keywords: Puke, heave, hurl, ralph, vomit, regurgitate, blech, toss, yak....
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 03:04:03 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.180050.2595@helios.physics.utoronto.ca> richarr@bullet.ecf (RICHARDSON  ROBBIE) writes:
>
>   When I was younger I used to eat the standard Big Mac, fries and a Coke.
>No problem here...but I swear the Big Mac must head straight from your mouth
>to your arsehole because by the time I got home I had to take a dump.
>
>   Several times after a visit to McYak's (while on the toilet) the shit would
>come out attached together by the STRANDS OF DICED LETTUCE found in the 
>ever popular Big Mac!!! Well it freaked me out as one turd used to hang from
>my butt waiting for the next one to be squeezed out!!! Has this happened to
>anyone else?
>
>-=*>robb
>"Turnips, Cucumber, Carrots, Parsnip...I fucked them all!" - from the UofT
>                                                             Varsity Newspaper

It has never occured to may take the time and effort to look... Even now
that you have brough up I don't think I'll be wasting my time either...
I'll leave that to the skatologist...

FX.

Newsgroups: alt.mcdonalds
From: csn0314@ux.acs.umn.edu (tim)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: RE:Scott's HD timeout problems
Summary: HD timeoutHD timeoutHD timeout HDtimeout HD timeout
Date: 8 Apr 92 03:43:28 GMT
Article-I.D.: ux.1992Apr8.034328.4486
Organization: University of Minnesota

Scott:
:Sorry to be a real pain in the but, but here's the next installment in
:the ongoing saga of 'Scott Tries To Install Linux'.
:Early this morning playing around trying to get things to work.  Decided
:to boot up with 0.95 as suggested in I Reid's Beginners Guide.  Made an fs,
:rebooted, and it worked, no probs.  Tried 0.95a and :
:8 virtual consoles
:4 pty's
:HD timeoutHD timeout .......
:dev 0300, block 0
:Unable to read partition table of device 0300
:HD timeoutHD timeout .......
:dev 0340, block 0
:Unable to read partition table of device 0340
:Partition tables ok.			/* Wonderful !!!! */
:harddisk I/O error
:dev 0341, block 1
:Kernel panic : Unable to mount root

:Before switching off, decided to reboot with 0.95a, just in case.
:Amazing, it worked.  Closed eyes, took a deep breath, tried again, it
:worked...<cut>

i got the same errors the first time i tried 0.95[a]. have you talked
to Linus? he helped me alot with those errors. i still get some error
messages but now i can run it without worrying about it crashing often. the 95c
patchces might  help some i think. 

:0.95 - works
:0.95a -
:HD timeoutHD timeoutHD timeoutHD timeout Partition tables ok.
:39488/43545 blocks
:14327/14515 inodes
:226 buffers - 241424 bytes buffer space
:Free mem : 1310720 bytes
:All systems functioning
:0.95a seems to work in the above manner 1 in 10 attempts.  I am doing
;:nothing strange between reboots.

have you run it more than just past the boot? i got timeouts when
writing or removing a large file[s] or anytime the disk was being
accessed alot.

:Remeber I can get 0.95a to works from hda1.  But for the moment at least
:I need to keep DOS as it is installed.

metoo. i have problems with one drive more than the other. it seems to
be a problem reading the drive, so i've been told. well, anyway,
you're not the only one with those problems and there could well be a
few minor changes in the HD driver that will help considerably. 

0.12 might work better for you also. have you tried that? i get
unexpected intterupt errors with 0.12 but it doesn't timeout. 

			tim
Xref: sparky alt.os.linux:2297 comp.os.linux:200
From: hlu@luke.eecs.wsu.edu (Hongjiu Lu -- Graduate Student)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: IMPORTANT: gcc 2.1, libc.a 2.1a and Linux
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:15:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Apr6.211500.7340
Organization: Washington State University
Originator: hlu@luke.eecs.wsu.edu

Hi,

I heard there were some problems with binaries linked with my new ld.
That is caused by the new a.out.h introduced with Linus's second patch.
The new a.out.h is compatible with the old one, But not vice versa.

My new ld (binutils.tar.Z) uses the new a.out.h. The binaries
linked by it can only run under the kernel with Linus's second patch,
which has to be built by the old ld.

Any programs using the old a.out.h, e.g., gdb, will not recognize the
binaries linked by the new ld. You can either use the old ld or use
the new version compiled with the new a.out.h.

From Linus's second patch, we are moving to VFS. As a result, there
will be some changes in libc.a. That means next release of gcc 2.x and
libs will not run under the kernel below Linus's second patch to 0.95a.
I strongly recommend you move to 0.95a with Linus's second patch if you
haven't done so.

H.J.
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
From: cm445a17@socrates.umd.edu (cm445a17)
Subject: man, nroff/groff --> Help me!!!!
Organization: University of Maryland University College
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 04:44:59 GMT

Does anyone know of a working copy of the man/nroff-troff package?
I got the man package from tsx-11.mit.edu and nroff and iit works
fine for pre-formatted pages, but for unformated ones, nroff complains
of unrecognized commands!!! (this is using the man switch)  Maybe this
is a problem with the nroff I got.  Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,

Jaime Jofre
From: paula@atc.boeing.com (Paul Allen)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: Binaries considered harmful
Date: 7 Apr 92 05:40:01 GMT
Reply-To: paula@atc.boeing.com
Organization: The Internet

(Subject line with appologies to E. Djikstra.  :-))

I have a proposal that I'd like people to consider.

I've been following Linux from the sidelines since last year sometime.
I've noticed that with each release some of the old binaries from the
previous release no longer work.  When people ask why some command or
other no longer works, the answer is often to recompile with the new
library, or with the new include files.  It seems to me that having
lots of old binaries around on the archive sites is causing more 
problems than it's worth.  Clearly, you need to have binaries for the
compiler and enough commands to bootstrap a system.  I think it's
counterproductive in the long run to distribute binaries for commands
that are not essential for bootstrapping.  They'll all eventually
be broken by some new release.

So here's my proposal:

- In addition to the binary boot and root images that currently 
  accompany new releases, a companion tarfile should be released
  containing things like the compiler for that release and other
  stuff that was too large to fit in the root image.

- Software that is not needed for bootstrapping should be placed in the
  archives in source or diff form only.

- Part of the process of installing a new Linux release is to recompile
  everything.

I may be missing something really obvious here, but I just don't see
the need for all these binaries.  I'd rather just have sources.  With
the exception of a few things that simply couldn't be compiled, Minix
has always been a source-only system.  (You got the binaries when you
bought Minix, and sources/diffs from the net kept you current from then
on.) I see no reason that Linux needs to work differently.  

I invite your comments, criticisms, flames, or whatever.

Paul Allen
pallen@atc.boeing.com
From: books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu (Roger Books)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: problems with make when not root
Date: 3 Apr 92 13:23:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: mailer.1992Apr3.082337.17490
Reply-To: books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu
Organization: F.S.U. Dept of Physics
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4


  I'm having a problem running make when I am not root.  I've tried setting
make to 0755, 0777, 6777 (bad thing to set make to) and although it changes 
my error, (not owner, not suid, not guid) it still won't run.  Everything 
works fine when I run it as root.

  The makefile I'm using it on belongs to me, all the dependencies are mine.

			Roger

			books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
From: David Fenyes <dfenyes@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu>
Subject: Unsubscribe
Reply-To: dfenyes@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu
Organization: The Internet
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 17:17:24 GMT

Hello,

Please unsubscribe me from the mailing list--

Thanks :-)  And I'm grateful for the wonderful service you've 
provided :-)

David.
--
David Fenyes                                 dfenyes@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu
University of Texas Medical School           Houston, Texas
Xref: sparky alt.os.linux:2526 comp.os.linux:467
From: liljeber@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Mika Pekka Liljeberg)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Partitioning Warning!
Date: 13 Apr 92 11:48:55 GMT
	<1992Apr12.151734.4845@donau.et.tudelft.nl>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland

In article <1992Apr12.151734.4845@donau.et.tudelft.nl> wolff@neuron.et.tudelft.nl (Rogier Wolff) wrote:
> 
> YEP happened to me too! DR DOS 6.0 recognizes MINIX and Linux partitions
> as if they are DOS 2.0 partitions, and will friendly as ever write format
> recover files to them, thereby destroying them.
> 
> This is clearly DR DOS's fault. I won't use it anymore. (too bad for the
> extra 30M i'd get on my 30M partition, haven't bought/found Stacker yet...)
> 
> 
> 						Roger

I don't use DRDOS myself, but I have a suggestion that might help.
Clearly DRDOS does not recognize Minix and Linux paritions and
blithely assumes (and this is surely a bug) that they are DOS 2.0
partitions. The obvious fix would be to use a partition ID that
DRDOS is sure to recognize as NON-DOS, say Xenix for instance.
Linux doesn't care one way or another. If memory serves, Xenix uses
ID $02. You can use Norton Utilities, or any of a number of partition
table editors, to change the partition ID.

		Mika


--
Mika Liljeberg			Email:	liljeber@kruuna.Helsinki.FI
Helsinki University			Mika.Liljeberg@Helsinki.FI
Dept. of Computer Science
From: books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu (Roger Books)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: ps095: problem with gcc2.1? and vile 3.13
Date: 3 Apr 92 13:16:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: mailer.1992Apr3.081630.17229
Reply-To: books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu
Followup-To: alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux
Organization: F.S.U. Dept of Physics
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4

In article <1992Mar31.124720@EECS.WSU.EDU>, hlu@EECS.WSU.EDU (Hongjiu Lu -- Graduate Student) writes...
>In article <1992Mar31.183936.1613@athena.mit.edu>, dhl@wet.net.netcom.com (Dahai Li) writes:
>|> Hi,
>|> 
>|> I am experiencing problem with ps095, compiled with gcc2.1.
>|> 
>|> I rebuilt the patched 0.95a kernel according to I Reid's post "Compiling kernel,
>|> installing ps: a solution".
>|> 
>|> The compilation of of 0.95a (using gcc2.1) went without any problem.
>|> 
>|> However, on linking ps, ld complained about unresolved external "_ctype".
>|> So I made the ctype.o of linux' lib.a one of ps' objects. It linked
>|> succesfully.
> 
>Please do not do anything like that to gcc 2.1. You don't know what you are doing.
> 
>|> 
>|> But when I called "ps -U /usr/src/linux/tools/system", Linux chocked, gave
>|> me a segment fault.
>|> 
>|> The system I am running Linux is a 2Meg Zenith 386 Laptop (Tubors PORT
>|> 386).
> 
>Glad to hear gcc 2.1 can run with 2MB. How big is your swap space?
> 
>|> 
>|> Any one has any idea what's wrong, and what should I do to overcome the
>|> problem?
>|> 
>|> Thanks in advance.
>|> 
>|> Dahai Li
> 
>Please wait for a few days. I will post a patch for ps with gcc 2.1. Here is
>a very short description.
> 
>I added some goodies to this pacth. Now you can configure your kernel
>at Makefile of the top level. Read the Makefile and edit it.
> 
>One bug in free.c is fixed.
> 
  I found when I had the same error, an unresolved external for "_ctype"
the compiler couldn't find the include file ctype.h.  I ended up having to
give an explicit path for it, although it found all the other header files.

			Roger

			books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu
From: jgifford@attmail.com
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: extra line with xcomm.
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:05:36 GMT
Reply-To: jgifford@attmail.com
Organization: The Internet

Hi, I recently d/l'd xcomm, and it was working fine. then this morning, when
I dialed into attmail, it suddenly started to add an extra line feed or
something.  I thought it might be attmail, but now I am using kermit(the old one,
the new one still does segmentation fault) and it is working fine, so the problem
has to be either me, or xcomm.
thanks for any help in advance, please e-mail to me, not the list.
jim gifford
jgifford@attmail.com
 ...!uunet!attmail.com!jgifford
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
From: ludwig@wefunk.rent.com (Mitchel F. Ludwig)
Subject: More Linux Questions.
Reply-To: ludwig@wefunk.rent.com (Mitchel F. Ludwig)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 12:07:37 GMT

Ahem...

   I hereby join the ranks of those begging for :


   1)	Ok, I have 0.95a installed.  What's it need in order to
become as up to date as it can be?

   2)	I know I know I know it's been asked, but how do I set this
bad boy up to boot from the hard drive?

   3)	Although my system is running on an MFM controller and two
st251-1 drives, the 0.95a kernel, on mounting a partition, complains
of a hard disk timeout.  I never hear a complaint again.  ???

   4)	Anyone with a stable UUCP package they using?


   5)	How about a cron?  Do we have one?  Can it be used?



Mitch
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
From: hpa@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin N9ITP)
Subject: Re: Too many duplicated messages
Reply-To: hpa@nwu.edu (Peter Anvin)
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 21:35:04 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.142501.27834@athena.mit.edu> of alt.os.linux,
  claris!wet!dhl%netcom.com@apple.com (Dahai Li) writes:
> 
> (what is the reason for this duplications? People send copies to two Linux
> news group: alt.os.linux, and comp.os.linux?)
> 

In my understanding, this group, alt.os.linux, is obsolete and only
comp.os.linux should be used.

	/hpa



-- 
INTERNET: hpa@nwu.edu   TALK:      hpa@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
BITNET:   HPA@NUACC     HAM RADIO: N9ITP, SM4TKN
IRC:      Scalar        NeXTMAIL:  hpa@lenny.acns.nwu.edu
"Kissing a smoker is like licking an ashtray."  -- Anon.
From: lee@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Greg Lee)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Binaries considered harmful
Summary: Source considered helpful
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:42:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Apr7.124221.16198
Organization: University of Hawaii

In article <1992Apr7.074614.5347@colorado.edu> drew@caesar.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt) writes:
}...
}Source should be freely available to anyone who wants it, 
}but a more convienient binary distribution should also
}be available.

Sounds good to me.  But there has never been source code available for any
of the versions of gcc, so far as I know, nor diffs against the fsf distribution.
I hope there will be.  I have never found source code for update.  The source
code I have for fsck doesn't come close to compiling with the current linux
include files.  I'm going to work on fsck.c (I question whether fsck -m works
properly now), but since I don't understand the filesystem, my prospects aren't
very good.

Anybody with any source, please upload.

--
Greg Lee <lee@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu>
From: johnsonm@stolaf.edu (Michael K. Johnson)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: Compilers
Date: 6 Apr 92 19:49:32 GMT
Reply-To: johnsonm@stolaf.edu (Michael K. Johnson)
Organization: The Internet

From: joel@wam.umd.edu (Joel M. Hoffman)

   In article <ktvj19INNf1r@alhena.usc.edu> ajayshah@alhena.usc.edu (Ajay Shah) writes:
   >Come on... it's $130 for a 4 Meg SIMM.

   Dell still charges $399 for their proprietary-format 4M SIMM.  :-((((

Can't you get third-party ones cheaper?  (Not telling you to -- just
curious...)  If you can't, that's one strike against buying dell...

michaelkjohnson
johnsonm@stolaf.edu
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
From: oreillym@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (Michael O'Reilly)
Subject: Re: jipped zip!
Organization: University of Western Australia
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 03:07:12 GMT

jgifford@attmail.com writes:
: I have a question about tex: does it work for plain old dot-matrix printers?
Yes. But it is messy. The way I do it is to do
tex --> dvips --> ghostscript --> my expson lx800.
Be warned that the highest resolution supplied for epsons with
ghostscript is 240x60. If you want 240x216 you have to bash ghostscript.  ;)

: 
: Also, is X public domain, or is it commercial?
It is not commerial, but neither is it exactly public domain. I think it
falls under the catagory of freeware. (Anyone know exactly want to
elaborate??)

: Is it possible to write a dos-emulator under Linux(you know, kinda like
: Soft-PC under Mac)?
Possible yes, easy no. :) If you write it a bunch of ppl will love you.

: jim gifford
: jgifford@attmail.com
:  ...!uunet!attmail.com!jgifford
From: eonu24@castle.ed.ac.uk (I Reid)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Partitioning Warning!
Date: 12 Apr 92 23:34:44 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

wolff@neuron.et.tudelft.nl (Rogier Wolff) writes:

>This is clearly DR DOS's fault. I won't use it anymore. (too bad for the
>extra 30M i'd get on my 30M partition, haven't bought/found Stacker yet...)

I'm a little wary about stacker 'cos although the idea is fine my friendly
neighbourhood service engineer tells me that he has been having a lot of
problem with HD's using stacker recently (recently started being used on
machines by the manufacturer of my machine). I don't know the specifics of it
but I thought I'd better post the warning. Note that I have never used stacker
although until this I had heard that it was good, worked well etc.

Iain
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
From: tree@midget.towson.edu (Denise Tree)
Subject: GCC2.1.....again
Reply-To: tree@midget.towson.edu (Denise Tree)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 14:04:01 GMT

Well....this is a last plea for help. I have been trying for three daysto implement gcc2.1.............I've got nothing except:
       
             In file included from test.c:1:
             /usr/include/stdio.h:101:parse error before '('
I have replaced tar and compress with the ones from 0.12 (tar +version reports
gnu tar 1.10). I then suspected a bad DL so I re-FTP'ed and DL'ed using
Kermit instead of XC. When running inst2.x I say yes to '387? 'cause I got one.
I replaced ld with ld.old and set to a+x. I don't know of anything else to try 
unless there are some permissions or something that I have overlooked.......
Thanks to all who replied to previous help!
.......................
Denise "desperate" Tree
From: erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Taylor-uucp 1.03 beta - porting status
Date: 7 Apr 92 01:59:19 GMT
Organization: Bleeding Edge Technologies - 'Sliding Down The Razor Blade Of Life...'

This is a followup to a previously posted message.

I've fixed the problems with uuxqt and uux "memory fault".
Now all that remains is to fix the debug problem with
uucico.  And test the whole thing, of course! :)

Note:  I've configured the package for a BNU-style (HDB)
uucp, since that's what seems to be prevalent.  Others
will have to reconfigure by hand.

I'll be uploading the (hacked) sources and binaries
to tsx-11 either this evening or tomorrow.  The binaries
(with H. J.'s gcc 2.1 shared library stuff) are about
200K in a tar file - probably a bit less compressed.
The sources are about 600K compressed - this includes
all the docs, as well.

I've also included a sample Systems and Devices file,
for those who just can't wait (like me!) :)

When Ian makes the diffs to the real 1.03 release available,
I'll be releasing the whole thing over again.

A big THANK YOU goes to H. J. for his work in getting
gcc 2.1 to run!  Thanks!!

Stay tuned...
-- 
Ed Carp  N7EKG/6	erc@khijol.UUCP		erc@apple.com
			Cupertino, CA		408/252-5947

-- Absolutely unabashed Gates McFadden groupie! --
From: pthoms@castle.edinburgh.ac.uk
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
Subject: request mail
Date: 12 Apr 92 10:30:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: athena.1992Apr12.103014.25253
Reply-To: pthoms@castle.edinburgh.ac.uk
Organization: The Internet


Hi can you send on the digest please !

Peter
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux
From: cm445a17@socrates.umd.edu (cm445a17)
Subject: Applying patches
Organization: University of Maryland University College
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:19:32 GMT

Could anoyone explain to me how to apply kernel patches???
When I do a patch < diffs > result 2>&1, patch does not seem
to be finding the files to patch.  I keep my Linux sources
in /usr/src/linux.  Am i having problems because the diffs
include a diffrent path?  Thanks,

Jaime
 
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
From: jwinstea@jarthur.claremont.edu (Jim Winstead Jr.)
Subject: Re: Binaries considered harmful
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, WIBSTR
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:16:18 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.124221.16198@news.Hawaii.Edu> lee@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Greg Lee) writes:
>I have never found source code for update.  The source code I have for
>fsck doesn't come close to compiling with the current linux include
>files.

I have the (as I know it) most current source for all of this, and
I'll be uploading them as a package today (hopefully) to tsx-11, etc,
and they should be available soon.  Look for system-0.95a.tar.Z.

Included:
	chsh	-	new to this release (change shell for a user)
	doshell	-	start a process on another tty
	fdisk-x	-	fdisk that understands extended partitions
	fdisk	-	the old fdisk
	hostname-	set your computer's name!
	mkfs	-	make a filesystem
	mknod	-	make a device
	mkswap	-	make a swap device/file
	mount	-	mount a filesystem
	passwd	-	change a user's password
	pwd	-	print working directory (from BSD)
	rootdev	-	display/change root device (rdev.c)
	setterm	-	set terminal characteristics
	swapon	-	use a swap file/partition
	sync	-	sync the filesystem (monster source! :)
	umount	-	unmount a filesystem
	update	-	background update thing - syncs filesystem

Like I said, keep an eye out for 'em - they are mostly the versions
from the 0.95a root disk, with some cleanup of the code, the addition
of a couple of minor utilities, and some other minor changes.

Er, now that I look at the list again, I notice I don't have fsck.
If I remember correctly, Linus mentioned having lost this source in a
hard drive disaster - anyone want to rebuild it?
-- 
Jim Winstead Jr. (CSci '95)    | "Catch a fish!"
Harvey Mudd College            |  -Geddy Lee,
jwinstea@jarthur.Claremont.EDU |   San Diego Sports Arena
Disclaimer: Mine, not theirs!  |   January 20, 1992
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux