HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: MEC038@UKCC.UKY.EDU (K=A*T)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Subject: Re: Re:Monday musings
Date: 26 Jan 93 13:18:54 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:MEC038@ukcc.uky.edu>
              26 Jan 1993 10:08:46 GMT from <dunstan@GEC-EPL.CO.UK>

What are the voting options of the US in the UN?

I know she can vote yes, she can veto, and I know she can
abstain.  But could she simply vote no without using her
veto power?

--KAT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:CDELL@UMKCVAX1.BITNET>
X-Envelope-to: politics@ohstvma.BITNET
X-VMS-To: @POL, @VAL
X-VMS-Cc: CDELL
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:07:54 -0600
From:         "VALENTINE M. SMITH" <CDELL@UMKCVAX1.BITNET>
Subject:      Further comments on Iraq ...
Comments: To: val-l@ucf1vm.bitnet, jwales@iubvm.bitnet, olsenj@stolaf.edu,
          kousen@rayleigh.res.utc.com, klur@maristb.bitnet,
          srdjan%cathy@kri.fer.yu

Both yesterday and today, US planes fired upon Iraqi radar stations for
the "crime" of turning on their radar. It seems to me that the US is
over-reacting to what I believe is a legitimate activity - to track possibly
hostile planes over Iraqi sovereign territory. Had Iraq fired on the planes,
my reaction might be much different. But, I believe the Iraqis are adhering
to the letter of their "ceasefire," and I think that the US is currently
exceeding its brief in firing on Iraqi radar. VMS
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:MEC038@ukcc.uky.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Mon, 25 Jan 1993 07:57:26 EST
From:         K=A*T <MEC038@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: smoke smoke smoke that cigarette
              22 Jan 1993 18:44:48 -0800 from <andy@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU>

On Fri, 22 Jan 1993 18:44:48 -0800 Andy Freeman said:

>>The article said that the Environmental Protection Agency estimates
>>that second hand smoke kills about 3,000 non-smokers annually.
>
>So?  (Suppose that 90% choose to live with a smoker.  Does that
>matter?)
>
>-andy notes that 3,000 is still at least an order of magnitude
>      less than MD's kill through "misadventure"
>
I think the IMPORTANT point here is that second and smoking
kills.  And, for example, when in a public library, government
offices, and other indoor public places, I should have the right
not to be exposed to second hand smoking.

--KAT (who five years ago when he went to the regional IRS office
       to ask a question, first asked the IRS officer if she
       could put out her cigarette.)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:JCOCURUL@DREW.BITNET>
X-Envelope-to: politics@ohstvma.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"politics@ohstvma.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:44:03 -0500
From:         JCOCURUL@DREW.BITNET
Subject:      Re: The Soldier of Fortune case
Comments: To: politics@ohstvma.bitnet

In article <tfilt460772@drew.edu>, "Daniel R. Reitman, Attorney to Be" <dreitman
   @OREGON.UOREGON.EDU> writes:

> In article <01GTXT4ETKBS000AGD@drew.drew.edu>,
>       JCOCURUL@DREW.BITNET writes...
>>P.S. For free speech absolutists out there (any?).  The SC denied oral
>>argument for Solidier of Fortune maganazine in a case where a former
>>mercenary advertised his services and was hired and did kill someone.
>>The magazine was sued for damages and lost.  Is this a free speech
>>violation?
>
> No.  This is negligence, pure and simple.  Since _Tarasoff v. Regents of
> University of California_, 17 Cal. 3d 425,  131 Cal. Rptr. 14, 551 P.2d 334
> (1976), there has been a general recognition that there is at least some level
> of duty to control the conduct of others.  Although in cases like _Tarasoff_,
> this duty was predicated on an existing threat to a specific individual, a "gu
   n
> for hire" ad _creates_ a generalized threat, and should draw a similar duty.
> (Please note:  This is conjectural reasoning, as I have not read the appellate
> decision(bodyguarding etc.), what level of control is required for
people like those at _Soldier of Fortune_?  The only way that a
specific individual is threatened is when someone answers the ad.  I
don't know if the answer goes through a _Soldier of Fortune_ mailbox
of some sort, but what if it went directly to the one who placed the
ad via say private P.O. Box.  How could _Soldier of Fortune_ control
the individual in that way?  Doesn't many _Soldier of Fortune_ ads
include some gun use that is dangerous?  What about sex clubs that
with the spread of AIDS etc. may be as lethal?  Anyone have any ideas
for a standard here?  I wouldn't have mind if the SC took the case,
since the first amendment deserves such a standard.

      -Joe
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:KSTE@PURCCVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Sun, 24 Jan 1993 00:45:40 EST
From:         Kerry Stephenson <KSTE@PURCCVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Chill

Hi, all:

I ain't been back long, but I've noticed a disturbing change in the
list since my mysterious departure.

I think there's been some sort of epidemic of TIGHT-LIPPED SOBRIETY
sweeping the net.  Symptoms:  failure to recognize satire, insistence
on replying to same with dour argument; lack of acceptance of in/out
role reversal, vis-a-vis the right/left dichotomy; irritability;
sanctimoniousness; anphylactic shock and hostile defense reaction
when faced with opposition.

Prescription:  Read this month's SPY magazine (the one with Hillary
 the Dominatrix on the cover), chill out, and watch Mystery Science
 Theater twice a week until the symptoms subside.

--NINAR Kerry
======================
As the existentialist said to the artist, "Freedom's just another
   word for nothing left, Toulouse."
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 1993 09:00:26 EST
From:         Daniel David Benson <bensonda@STUDENT.MSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Sounds
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu
              at Jan 27, 93 2:47 am

>
> Hi Dan:
>
> As a certified political scientist, the best reason to be in PS is
> to *observe* politics.  Once you understand how it works, you
> figure out what a game it really is.
>
> Don't worry if you feel like you don't "belong" anywhere in the
> political system.  You don't have to be a dog to be a good
> veterinarian.  In fact, you're better off if you're not.
>
> --NINAR Kerry
>
Good point. Thanks. I was having a mid-twenties  crisis there on my career
pick. Good to get more mundane goals in mind *observe* the process and
*understand* rather than loftier utopian ideals.

-Dan
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Thu, 28 Jan 1993 13:43:06 CST
From:         Titivillus <T9AA@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Reagan's legacy and the politics of the SC
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu

> >From:         Titivillus <T9AA@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>

> Puny Apparatchik,

> You are right that it is unlikely that the House would impeach
> a President in the midst of wartime. But they can impeach him
> later!

Well, once the troops get home, everyone will (or at least should,
unless someone really screwed up) be an upsurge of patriotism that
will end up boosting the president's approval rating. Rep. Henry
Gonsalez (I think. I can look it up) drafted impeachment papers
for George Bush after the Six Week War. They went nowhere.

It is institutionally possible but realistically doubtful.

> >1) You can ask them to leave. No one has the power to fire a Supreme.

> What's the deal here, Dave? Congress has the power to fire a Supreme.
> Impeachment again. You don't like impeachment, huh?

Oh, yes. That sort of got glossed over in my HS Poli Sci class, I
guess. I now officially file form DS-24456-EZ ("apology to a Czar
by a subsurvient apparatchik for totally blowing it")

I like impeachment in general, but I like recall better. B)

> Jamie

From the Desk of Dave,
Apparatchik of Dictionaries
  (and conspiracy theorist)
(aka Larva, Trip Buster, Dave Zero, Didactic Dave)
t9aa@sdsumus.sdstate.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 1993 10:16:52 CST
From:         "rufus t. firefly" <U9AA@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Hillary & Health Care
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu

> IMHO, the controversy over Hillary being named as head of the Health
> Care Task Force is raging because she's the First Lady.  A lot of
> people take a dim view of a First Lady who dares to do something other
> than show people around and take care of the family.  How many people
> complained when Bobby Kennedy was named as Attorney General by his
> brother?
>
> Evelyn Duncan

   *i* take a dim view of what she's doing because she appears to be
a serious radical who could do serious damage to the country, should
she get anywhere near the levers of power. as i recall, no one had any
serious problems when rosalyn carter sat in on cabinet meetings and
such. and plenty of people didn't like it when bobby kennedy was AG.
the anti-nepotism thing was a direct result of his tenure there.

rtf
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:CORJB@RHODES.BITNET>
X-Envelope-to: POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: CORJB
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:43:43 -0500
From:         Jason Briggs Cormier <CORJB@RHODES.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Homosexuals in the Military

Dave:

I don't know and therefore am seriously asking, but how "off-guard"
were we at the onset of WWI and II?

Furthermore, I know some who could make a very good case for us
not having gotten into either of those.  That being the case, it
really wouldn't matter even if we were caught off guard.

As I said, I don't think that there is much reason to have a massive
military unless there is the possibility of an invasion of US territory
proper.  I simply don't see this as a real threat in any fashion.

I might add that I use the term "massive" because of the amount of
defense spending our country has.  Given the geopolitical world since
the end of the Cold War, I find that it is unwarranted.

jbc
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU:ST402711@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Thu, 21 Jan 1993 12:38:04 EST
From:         Tim Johnson <ST402711@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Clinton and JFK

>I read that JFK is Clinton's idol.
>Does that means that Clinton is waiting to be killed?
>Or does it mean something
>different? Could anyone explain me, please?

I think it means that Bill is
hoping for a piece of Madonna.

                              -Tim
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
From: jhalat@csfb1.fir.fbc.com (James Halat)
Subject: Re:      "On Gay Rights ..."
Reply-To: uunet!csfb1!jhalat
Organization: First Boston Corporation
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:41:54 GMT

In article <01GTYVHHAK4I8WW6X3@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>,         "VALENTINE M. SMITH" <CDELL@UMKCVAX1.BITNET> writes:
|> "On Gay Rights ..."
|> 
|> [...]
|> I personally would have little reason to love homosexuals, having
|> been sexually assaulted by five such individuals over thirty years
|> ago. 
|> [...]
|> I've spent my entire life overcoming the prejudices I was raised with
|> - my parents basically did not like Jews, blacks, Catholics, gays,
|> some unionists (the Teamsters), Hispanics, "odd religions" and, to a
|> lesser degree, Native Americans (a group my father was fascinated
|> with, my mother could do without), and cigar smokers. 
|> [...]


You may have little reason to love five gay jerks from thirty years ago,
but you have no reason to have little reason to love gays in general.

Perhaps your parents indoctrinated you with deeper bigotry than even you realize.


-- 
James Halat                    e-mail:  uunet!csfb1!jhalat          
The First Boston Corporation   -- I speak only for myself --
New York City                     







Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 1993 22:41:24 CST
From:         Titivillus <T9AA@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: 12:01 PM
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu

> >>         And Iraq was, right up until the failed coup, a client of the USSR.
> >bzzzt.  Sorry Brett'.  The United States 'tilted' toward Iraq virtually
> >immediately.  We have been supplying Saddam with money and arms for over
> >a decade.  It could also be that they receieved money/arms from the USSR
> >as well.
> >Jonathan

>         I eagerly await the list of arms that we (the US) provided.

I hate to mention this, but really, most of what Iraq received was
in the form of information (as I recall.)

ARGH! I'm agreeing with brett' again! MAKE IT STOP!!

> Brett'

From the Desk of Dave,
Apparatchik of Dictionaries
  (and conspiracy theorist)
(aka Larva, Trip Buster, Dave Zero, Didactic Dave)
t9aa@sdsumus.sdstate.edu
X-VMS-To: in::"politics@ucf1vm.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Mon, 25 Jan 1993 07:14:32 -0500
From:         "Chris A. Sloffer" <SLOFFER_CHRIS_A@LILLY.COM>
Subject:      Re: Zoe Baird
Comments: To: politics <politics@ucf1vm.bitnet>

>to here deal with Zoe Baird.  Briefly I think she was shafted and was
>a scapegoat.  Loads of people are in her situation with the state of
>day care and the like today, including two people to run for governor
>in NJ (including the woman who almost beat Bill Bradley).  She erred,
>but in the context of why she erred, she didn't deserve to be denied
>her position because of the infraction.

Sigh....  I knew that people would wimper about her not being confirmed.
The simple fact is that she broke the law.  Your position on child care is
irrelevant.  It doesn't matter.  She broke the law.  If the child care thang
bothers you, call it theft.  She stole.  She shouldn't have been confirmed.

>                                         We have a Commerce Secretary
>now with more questionable dealings than Zoe's.  Her conservate
>positions seem to me helped her shafting -- she would of offered the
>kind of diversity Clinton spoke of before he set up his Cabinet,
>diversity of belief/views, not just sex or race. I'm glad (in a way,
>in another way more questioning of some might have been warranted) all
>the other Cabinet officers got in ok, but Zoe Baird should have been
>among them.

I agree that Brown is rater shifty and that his past activities are exactly
that type of actions that the president campaigned against.  However, I have
not heard of any evidence that Brown broke the law in his dealings.  If such
proof existed then he, too, should not have been confirmed.

Chris

>     -Joe

BTW, Joe, I know that you didn't say some of the things I attributed to you
above.  This was a reply to many of the messages on this subject, not just
yours.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-VMS-To: IN%"POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:20:15 -0500
From:         MCW001@ACAD.DRAKE.EDU
Subject:      Re: smoke smoke smoke that cigarette
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu

        Not to sound like the P.R. guy from Phillip-Morris, but considering
that the amount of smokers in the US has been steadily dropping for
years, down to the lowest level in who knows when...  And, considering
that the places in which smokers are allowed to puff away are rapidly
disappearing, I'd have to question those findings-in the sense that
there has to be another reason for them.

                                        Travlr
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xerox-l
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 09:00:21 CST
From:         Bob Green <GRET@NUACVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Maintenance

    Does anybody have another company other than Xerox doing
maintenance on your 4090?  If so who and how has the service been?


Thanks
       Bob
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xerox-l
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 10:48:02 -0600
From:         Dave Del Real 2-8496 <SPGDDR@UCBCMSA.BITNET>
Subject:      Lost Output on Xerox 4050

We think that the lost output problem is resolved.  Just 2 days ago Xerox
applied a patch to our 3.7 Xerox operating system.  The patch number is SA960A.
If you have a 4050 the patch number would be AE960D.  Not enough time has
past since the our patch was applied to be 100% sure the patch will solve
our problem, but I feel very confident that it will. Xerox was able to
reproduce the problem before the patch was applied, and apply the patch and
the problem went away.

My understanding from Xerox is that there were 4 versions of the patch for
the 4050 3.5 operating system. The patch numbers are AE960A, B, C, and D,
with the D version the one you should have on your 3.5 system.  Xerox's
documentation stated that the patch for our 3.7 system was included in
the release of 3.7.  Later it was found that only the AE960A version of the
patch was included in 3.7.  The SA960A patch for the 4850 is equivalent to the
AE960D for the 4050.
*** Forwarding note from ADMN8621--RYEVM    01/18/93 12:14 ***
Received: from RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca by cmsa.Berkeley.EDU (Mailer R2.08 R208004)
 with BSMTP id 7772; Mon, 18 Jan 93 12:14:46 PST
Received: from RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca (ADMN8621) by RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca (Mailer R2.08
 ptf039) with BSMTP id 4751; Mon, 18 Jan 93 15:13:29 EST
Date:         Mon, 18 Jan 93 15:10:16 EST
From:         Larry Anta <ADMN8621@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Organization: RYERSON POLYTECHNICAL INSTITUTE
Subject:      Lost Output on Xerox 4050
To:           Dave Del Real <spgddr@ucbcmsa>
Message-Id:   <930118.151016.EST.ADMN8621@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>

Dave, some time ago you posted an entry on XEROX-L regarding losing
JES2 output when you upgraded your JES to V4 R2.  We're about to make
the upgrade ourselves here at Ryerson Polytechnical Institute and we
have a XEROX 4050.

Just curious, did you ever get to the bottom of that lost output?  Was
it a XEROX problem?  Thanks for any info you can give me...I don't
subscribe to XEROX-L personally; your note was passed by my desk.
Thanks again.

........................................................................
: Larry Anta (Systems Programmer)     Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M5B 2K3 :
: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute     Voice-   (416) 979-5000 Ext 6817 :
: Room AB-54  350 Victoria Street     Bitnet-  ADMN8621@RYERSON        :
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
    Lost Output on Xerox 4050                                               T

cc: ADMN8621--RYEVM
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.libres
Date:         Thu, 21 Jan 1993 11:35:57 EDT
              <LIBRES@KENTVM.BITNET>
From:         EDITORS@KENTVM.BITNET
Subject:      LIBRES 3.1 Table Of Contents

LIBRES 3.1 Table of Contents (33 lines)

LIBRES:  Library and Information Science Research
(ISSN:  1058-6768 published monthly)
January 19, 1993

=======================================================================
This issue is archived and can be retrieved via e-mail to Listserv@
kentvm.kent.edu or via anonymous ftp to ksuvxa.kent.edu in the library
directory as LOG 9301
========================================================================

Table of Contents
-----------------

     FEATURE ARTICLE

1.  The New World Order and the Geopolitics of Information by Christopher
    Brown-Syed (Part 1-939 lines, Part 2-876 lines, Part 3-387 lines)

     NOTES AND QUERIES

1.  NOTE:  Request for Input into AGARD Information Science Agenda
           (30 lines)
2.  QUERIES:  Computer Literacy Survey (297 lines)
3.  QUERIES:  E-Copyright Survey (126 lines)

     ANNOUNCEMENTS

1.  Faculty Position Open (29 lines)
2.  Computer Network Posdoc Position (24 lines)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"TOOLB-L@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.toolb-l
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 1993 11:02:25 -0600
From:         CLKREY@OA.STKATE.EDU
Subject:      Re: Please Help!

Jeff:

I have to agree with BertW about using timed displays.  Especially, if you're
working with a diverse user group & there's anything on screen to read.  I've
had to un-do some built-in pauses becauses I didn't anticipate correctly the
time needed to process the info on the screen.  I have used them successfully
where the program is executing a routine & does it too quickly for the user
to finish reading/viewing a screen before it moves on to the next page...but
again it's difficult to know exactly how long is long enough for any given
user (or machine for that matter...our students usually have faster CPUs than
I can afford!)

Good luck,

Cyndy
clkrey@oa.stkate.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: TOOLB-L@UAFSYSB.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"TOOLB-L@UAFSYSB.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.toolb-l
Date:         Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:28:01 -0700
From:         JHALL@ARIZVMS.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Writing files

Re: writing files from Toolbook.  A couple of followup questions
to Graham about writing to files.  I have done quite a bit of this
and had no problems BUT,

Have to be carefule about creating a file that does not exist in
name already.  I don't remember the exact problem but using the
protect parameter caused problems for me. The results (if I did not
erase the old file with the same name) before I tested the script
again would be to not create a file and simply leave me with the old
file with nothing it.  Similar to what you have.  So at least during
debugging phase, be sure to erase the old file when you create.

I am also extremely careful about writing then closing the file then
opening the file up again to write new information (say a new page
or whatever).  I never leave the file open for an extended period of
time and it has been 100% reliable.

So, have you tried creating a file, then just alternate among the
openfile, writefile, closefile commands to accomplish the task.  What
I usually do is upon subject id at the beginning of the survey, I create
the file then close it and then for the rest of the application
use open/write/close sequence.

So what is my question?? Just what sequence are you using to accomplish
the writing to files.  We'll deal with the network issue next.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.toolb-l
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 1993 13:56:22 CST
From:         Lee Hancock <LE07144@UKANVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Activating text field scripts globally

Can some one tell me if there is a way to automatically activate scripts
in the text field property. I have a client who has about 50 pages with
blinking text cursors. Do we have to go through them one field at a time? 8-(

Thanks for any help that comes my way.

Lee


========================================================================
Lee Hancock                            || Archie R. Dykes Library
Educational Technologist               || 3901 Rainbow Blvd.
University of Kansas Medical Center    || Kansas City, KS 66160-7181
                                       || (913) 588-7144
Bitnet   - LE07144@UKANVM              ||
Internet - LE07144@UKANVM.CC.UKANS.EDU || "Knowledge is nothing if not
                                       ||  shared"... Me
Owner & Editor: Internet/BitNet Health Science Resources List
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU