HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: morourk@neumann.une.edu.au (Michael O'Rourke)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Limits on TARDIS travel (Was Re: The Doctor is...)
Date: 20 Nov 92 07:16:03 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.212248.28473@tms390.micro.ti.com>, nsmith@tms390.micro.ti.com (Neal Smith) writes:
	<bits deleted>
> There's at least one episode contradicting this... in _Castrovalva_, the
> Master sends the TARDIS back to "Event One, the hydrogen inrush", i.e.,
> the Big Bang, the start of time.  I would assume, if this is the start
> of the universe, that it is before the Gallifreyans/Time Lords [no, I'm
> not interested in continuing the Gallifreyan vs. Time Lord flamewar 
> from Hell] invented time travel, so it doesn't seem to have a limit in
> this direction.

Actually, the big-bang did not start with a hydrogen inrush, I think they're
refering to the start of the galaxy ('though I'm not even sure that this
started with a hydrogen inrush either).
The big-bang is a weird phenomenon; the big bang
produced the entire universe as we know it today, all matter, all energy etc.
But here's the catch...it also produced all time and space as well.  So
not only was there no hydrogen to undergo an inrush, there was no space-time
for it to inrush in, either.
So the TARDIS hasn't as far as we know travelled to the start of time; maybe
back to the start of our galaxy (or some other galaxy), but that's all.
					Michael.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: jasstev@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (stevens jason)
Subject: ***RUMOUR UPDATE***
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:00:58 GMT

 To alleviate the shock of Tenth Planet part 4, I will quickly note the current
 rumours running around British fandom as to the missing episodes that could
 be returned.

 Power of the Daleks 2 and 4, held by a private collector.

 Galaxy Four, returned dubbed in Arabic?

 As to the Highlanders, this seems merely speculation on this side of the Pond   as the situation stands.

 *******THESE ARE ONLY RUMOURS*******
 Jason.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Colin Baker poll
From: HISC9016351D@LUST.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:25:58 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

> 
Lets face a few facts.  Colin Baker presented a Dr. to the audience that 
people didn't like simply because he acted the part differently.  The
previous Doctor was mainly your huggable type who was more human than alien.
The 6th Doctor suffered one of the most traumatic regenerations of any 
incarnation, and of course he would be unstable.  Just look at the riot
of colors which made up the costume.  Surely this indicates anm unbalanced
incarnation.
 Now because Baker played the Doctor like the alien he was people bag the hell
out of him.  Cast your minds back to the 4th Doctor.  Wasn't he the most alien
of his predecessors?  Of course, because that is how Tom Baker wished to 
play him that way.  
 Personally, i very much enjoyed the brief period of Colin Bakers reign, and it
is that brevity that so angers and saddens me.  As was pointed out in  Dr.
Who magazine some time ago, if Baker had continued on, the 6th Doctor would
have gained some  of the mysterious qualities that the 7th Doctor enjoyed.  
And everyone seemed to enjoy that in the 7th Docotr, didn't they?  Given 
the nature of his tenure, Colin Baker and the supporting cast, get top marks
from me for the job they did.  It was often entertaining and provocative,
which is what it was meant to be.  If the scripts were bad, and i find little
evidence of that iun 90% of the stories, then so what.  Were you all 
entertained.  Didn't you get a kick out of seeing the Daleks, Cybermen, Davros
the Master, the Rani, the Valeyard and the Sontarans.  WEren't you
intrigued by  the Trial season?  Didn't the 6th Doctor's portrayal make
you think about the true nature of the Doctor, that he was a Time Lord, an
ALIEN.  And foremost, weren't you entertained.  Doctor Who is all about 
entertainment, so wake up people and smell the coffee.  Colin Baker and
the 6th Doctor were great, so give them a fair go.
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: DOCTOR WHO MOVIE & SCRIPT INFO!!!
Date: 16 Nov 92 17:47:51 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Nov16.015232.11933@bsu-ucs> 00bwanderson@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:









>*sigh*  Unfortunately, this is all too true.  Of course, the article I remember
>from Starlog was dated around 1988, I think.  So perhaps we'll see the movie in
>the next year or two.  It would make a pleasent change from all of these stupid
>hero flicks and soppy, over-emotional tear-jerkers and WAY STUPID teen flicks. 
>OK, so where were all the good SF flix this summer? 8^)

>Spock out...
>-- 
>.sig?  We don' need no steenkin' .sig!

>Bruce Anderson: A tradition of Chaos and Disorder since 1967
>spock@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (unix)	00bwanderson@bsu-ucs.uucp (VAX)
>Don't look at me in that tone of voice!  BSU disclaims me, and I disclaim them.

Well, I ws impressed by Alien 3, despite its startling departure from the
other two films.  Criticisms (e.g. gratuitous use of the word f***, which did
have some interesting thematic implications, made the last half somewhat
grating) were not too difficult to overlook, and on the whole it was a
daring move to end something which could easily have carried on into sequel
hell.  But I agree that the summer was somewhat lame as far as movies go
(excepting the silly but charming Batman Returns).

That's why I'm glad we now have Dracula!

BTW, could someone explain how to create and use a .sig?  This is stunningly
ignorant of me, I know, but I've only been newsgrouping for two months...

Drewcifer

PS E-mail me, please, so we don't take up data space.
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: who'd make a goo who?
Date: 20 Nov 92 21:30:33 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Nov20.4153.14319@dosgate> dale.clayton@canrem.com (dale clayton) writes:

>Daniel Bishop wrote:

>-> I liked Colin Baker's costume!

> I thought it made him look like some cartoon character. I don't think
>it aided in The Doctor's credibility.
> Probably the best costume, and best related to The (a) Doctor, was
>McCoy's. As an occasional traveller myself, his outfit makes the most
>sense. Good pocket space, mobility and credible for this type of
>character (traveller, explorer, adventurist, scientist, technologist,
>teacher, learner, journeyman :-/,  etc.). I can't see how CB fits in
>there. At least, not with the costume aspect. CB looked like he wanted
>to run away with the circus. There are now too many adults fans that
>wouldn't go (or went) along with that concept.

>Regards,
>Dale Clayton
>-----------------------
>dale.clayton@canrem.com
>--
>Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
>World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044

Jeez, picky picky picky!  :)

Practicality is one thing, style is another.  I think Daniel probably liked
the style of CB's costume rather than the practicality.  My objection to
McCoy's costume was that it was kind of bland, a bit of a retread of
previous outfits.  Pertwee's, Tom Baker's, and Davison's were my favorites.

And surprise, surprise: these are my favorite Doctors!

Drewcifer
-- 
****************************************************************************
*  Andrew David Simchik *  DISCLAIMER: I said it... 			   *
*  a.k.a. Drewcifer     *  			No one else would!	   *							   *
****************************************************************************
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Who'd make a goo Who?
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:26:09 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Nov18.131059.21763@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> wr001b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (william e raftery) writes:



>>Yeah yeah. And Peri is such a convincing American. What's the difference?

>	When you look at it, Peri may have been a preety good American at
>that. She was great for the fish-out-of-water bits, had the brain power of a
>gerbil (I apologize to all offended gerbils) and of ocurse as someone
>pointed out earlier was bouncing around all over the place with no support.
>Peri just needed a Californian Valley-girl airhead voice, and it would have
>been perfect. 

	Hey, we're not *all* that bad!  :)  The problem *I* had with Peri
was the writers' fault.  They simply couldn't write dialogue that sounded
like American-speak; the word choices and constructions were all teddibly
British.  Also, her accent slipped occasionally: she'd say "Doctah" or
pronounce "been" like "bean" instead of "Ben".
	Nicola Bryant was much more entertaining in Blackadder's Christmas
Carol.
	I think we also need to watch casting people as Dr. Who simply
because they're great actors.  The Doctor needs to have a special kind of
quirky personality...I think Hopkins could pull it off better than Jones. 
Oldman is also one of my choices; after "Dracula" I was convinced about both
of them.  The actor must also have a certain personality of his own; Dr. Who
is not a character you get into, it's a character that develops anew with
each actor, so the actor must also be able to synthesize his own psyche with
an alien one.
	Don't misunderstand me; JEJ is a fine, fine actor, but I think he'd
simply be out of place as the Doctor.  My own opinion; no flames please.


-- 
****************************************************************************
*  Andrew David Simchik *  DISCLAIMER: I said it... 			   *
*  a.k.a. Drewcifer     *  			No one else would!	   *							   *
****************************************************************************
From: aodn307@bongo.cc.utexas.edu (Joshua Henry Geurink)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Regenerations???
Date: 15 Nov 92 21:32:54 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <1992Nov12.001000.11787@bsu-ucs> 00rrchorzemp@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>In article <rpcqa3j@lynx.unm.edu>, doctor@lacerta.unm.edu (Doc (the one and only...)) writes:
>> Why is it that every time the Doctor has regenerated he gains weight, hair
>> agility, etc?I know when a time lord regenerates he/she takes on a new
>> physical form, but to what extent?  Also why does the TARDIS "evolve" every
>> time the doctor regenerates?  The control pannel gets more and more complicated
>> with each new regeneration.  Watch one one of William Hartnell's episodes and
>> compare the control pannel to one of the Collin Baker episodes.

>> Any ideas guys???

>Well, we know there is a type of 'symbiosis' between the TARDIS and the owner 
>(the Doctor).  Maybe the TARDIS is accomidating itself to the new regeneration
>of the Doctor?

BZZZZZZZZZTTTT!  Error.  The Doctor just choses to remodel the TARDIS every
so often.  Look at the Five Doctors... Peter Davidson had just completed
the finishing touches on HIS TARDIS as this episode (about halfway into
his episodes-or-so) began.
	I recall from somewhere that the TARDIS responds to the Doctor's mental
commands; he remodels the interior either with conscious design or subconscious
tinkering.

=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
King Rat                     |  "You got the power, (Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!)
aka Josh Geurink             |   You got the might, (No Way!)
aodn307@bongo.cc.utexas.edu  |   Get ready for battle, (Give me your money!)
                  Defeat the Black Knight!"
`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`
From: morgans@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Who'd make a good Who?
Date: 18 Nov 92 04:03:53 GMT
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

In article <1992Nov17.181739.5483@lsa.umich.edu>, kausch@med.umich.edu (David Kausch) writes:
> 
> Instead of Sly Stallone or (give me a break) K Costner, how about the 
> vivacious William Hurt?  Or worse yet, Patrick Swazye?

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.......

The Master: So Doctor, what will it be?

Doctor: It is either my way or the highway....

Later

Siobahn (Shabang) Morgan

DeAnna got back to work.
From: labaks@emory.edu (Abraham Song)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: TARDIS ASCII?
Date: 23 Nov 92 03:54:32 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

Dear Fellow Dr. Who Fans...
	
	Does anyone on this newsgroup have any ascii of the Doctor's
	Tardis?  I would really appreciate getting any of these
	ascii's!!!!  I would also really appreciate any other Dr. Who
	ascii pictures also.....  

	Please e-mail me at labaks@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu

	Thanks much!
	Abraham K. Song, the Doctor
	.
From: danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Who'd make THE BEST Who???
Date: 24 Nov 92 05:13:51 GMT
Reply-To: danaf@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

In article <1992Nov23.205928.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu>, bmcraw01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
|> 
|> I'm probably gonna get punched in the virtual teeth for this, but as long as
|> we're talking American actors...
|> 
|> How about Christopher Lloyd?  I think he'd be great as The Doctor.  And he's
|> already had time travel experience!!! (Remember Doc Brown of the _Back to the
|> Future_ movies?)  :-)

You're gonna need a virtual dentist by the time I get through with you...

    !!         POW!                          B            S
   P                     B                   A             O
  O                       A                  P            C
 B                         M                 P             K
                            !                !              !


<<Hey, how about Adam West?>>

8)

|> -- 
|> ========================================================================
|> | Bruce M. Crawford                           !  "It's not the years,  !
|> |                                             !   it's the mileage."   !
|> |  Internet:  bmcraw01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu  !     - Indiana Jones    !
|> !    BITNET:  bmcraw01@ulkyvx                 !                        !
|> ========================================================================
|> ! "This above all: to thine own self be true. And it must follow as    !
|> !  the night the day, thou canst not then be false to any man."        !
|> !              _Hamlet_, Act I, Scene III                              !
|> ========================================================================

-- 
/////////////////////////[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
(718)             (212)                        (516)             (518)
=======Amiuser============Frank R. Dana, Jr.============Doc Ami=======     
--------My opinions rarely reflect those of any sane person,----------
	   living, dead, or undead... that's gonna CHANGE.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: TARDISy things
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 02:28:32 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.095307.22171@cs.ucf.edu> wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson) writes:
>Yes, that says "TARDISy things" since I'm talking about things related to
>the TARDIS. As you'll see in another article, I went through Shada in a lot
>of detail. I noticed two uncommon TARDISy things (both in ep. #6):
>
>2) The professor's TARDIS materializes IN A WALL of the Krarg Carrier Ship
>in the form of a door. I thought it was pretty evident that the TARDIS could
>materialize around things but not in them. The fact that it occurs in a wall
>comes straight out of the script (since it's not in the video then it's not
>canon, right!?).

Well, how about this... That TARDIS materialized around a section of the wall
just large enough for the TARDIS to fit into, then the Chameleon Circuit re-
formed the TARDIS into a replica of part of the wall, with a door in it. Does
that make any sense? So, somewhere inside that TARDIS there woould be a large,
free-standing section of spaceship-wall.


-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
From: teexijd@ioe.ac.uk (IAN DAVENPORT)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: POLL for a new DOCTOR!
Keywords: diddly dum
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:15:52 GMT
Organization: Institute of Education, University of London

In <Bxty0t.CKM@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jasstev@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (stevens jason) writes:


>  Would it be agood idea to poll the newsgroup readers on who they think
>  should play the new Doctor in a possible new series? 
>  I would be willing BUT I WILL NOT HAVE ACCESS TO A TERMINAL BETWEEN
>  11/18/92 AND 12/1/92, SO DO NOT MAIL ME!!
>  Is there anybody willing, or shall we just have a debate on the net?

Nice idea. The only problem I have with this is conceptual, in that for the
most part actors have been plucked from obscurity for the part of the Doctor,
with a couple of notable exceptions, whereas for any discussion to be useful,
well-known actors would be picked. I imagine the standard actor-pool for US
viewers is significantly different than the pool the BBC would look at, and
which UK posters would recognise.

So saying, I think Tony Slattery deserves a shot at a straight part, but would
probably be passed over because of (1) his lewd sense of humor and (2) he's
Channel 4, and we couldn't have that on the BBC! ;-)

>  Jason.

Ian J Davenport    MULLARD SPACE SCIENCE LABORATORY    ijd@uk.ac.ucl.mssl

                   "Dick, I'm _VERY_ disappointed."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: rkvidyar@eos.ncsu.edu (RAMAN KUMAR VIDYARTHI)
Subject: Re: Who'd make a goo Who?
Originator: rkvidyar@c00004-118dan.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: rkvidyar@eos.ncsu.edu (RAMAN KUMAR VIDYARTHI)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:15:02 GMT



|>If you want a really gooey Dr Who, I would recommend the Pillsbury 
|>dough-boy, but he might have a binding contract.
|>
|>I'm sorry, I shouldn't have said that.
|>
|>Actually I am not sorry I said it, but to answer your intended question, at 
|>least what I think your intended question was, who'd make a good Doctor - 
|>let's see how about the regulars - Jeremy Brett, Jack Nicholson, Michael 
|>Keaton (NOT!), Mike Meyers (Excellent!), John Lithgow, Christopher Lloyd, 
|>Denholm Elliot, Rowan Atkinson (who would name their child Rowan?), Hugh 
|>Laurie, Stephen Fry, Craig Charles (smegging good choice)........
|>
|>Later
|>
|>Siobahn (Shabang) Morgan
|>morgans@iscsvax.uni.edu
|>
|>But then, who would name their kid Siobahn?
|>
Hey!  Howabout Prince Charles or George Bush?

A.R.L.
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Off-screen adventures(more to the list)
Date: 18 Nov 92 05:28:55 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <1992Nov16.121304.12809@lugb.latrobe.edu.au> HISC9016351D@LUST.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert) writes:
>> 
>In Silver Nemesis did we not see a painting of Ace in
>Windsor Castle which dated back several centuries?

Only if we read the book.  The scene was shot but cut -- unless there's
an extended edition in circulation somewhere...
From: rickert@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John H. Rickert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Who'd make THE BEST Who???
Date: 20 Nov 1992 18:31:52 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Reply-To: rickert@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John H. Rickert)
NNTP-Posting-Host: g215a-1.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

In article <hnz1n2#@rpi.edu> danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.)  
writes:
> Hmm.. Michael Caine. I actually considered that for a while. Here's another 
> idea that will get a lot of people mad at me...
> 
> John Lithgow.
> 
> Granted, we've never seen him playing anything really close to that type of
> role, but I caught an interview with him on some cable channel recently and
> it just hit me... "he'd make a great Doctor!".
Gee, I've thought that for several years. 
He's a good actor and doesn't have an established 'identity'.
Seems to me that that's just what we need in the actor 
portraying the Doctor.

seeing, hearing (my two sense worth)
john rickert
rickert@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
Subject: Thanks a lot you dip . . .
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:07:20 GMT

In an article misnamed as "Yeah, I read that in a fanzine  . . . "
1-1@tardis.cojones.com (Peter W. Losher) wrote:
> Regarding Message : Re: McCoys portrayal of the Doctor

I really wanted to skip these stupid McCoy and/or Ace threads, but you keep
changing the subject without changing the topic. You obviously have control
over the subject line...leave it alone.

You're acting like Dave when he put DSY in all the subjects. Can't remember
the threads you follow? You even told me in e-mail that you were leaving the
subjects alone. Am I the only one this is bothering? I'd like to skip the
trash discussion and go to less opinionated stuff.

Annoyed once again,
Tom
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.startrek.misc,alt.startrek.creative,alt.fan
From: echristo@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Elena A Christofides)
Subject: Re: MAW Spinoff#3
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:06:01 GMT

>    going to need this ship to recover my TARDIS from the Borg craft.
>    (It's just typical, the one chance I get to avoid those tin-plated
>    psychotic pepperpots, and I not only  end up taking them with me, but
>    I land right in the middle of another load of crazed cyborgs.0
>    Let me just say that it would be better for us all if the Borg don't
>    assimilate my TARDIS's capabilities, it would mean the end of us all!
>Troi:    You want to prevent this catastrophe?
>Master:  I'll settle for just not being here when it happens!
>Troi:    Thn I'm afraid I cannot help you, I must warn the Captain.
>Master:  I can't let you do that. Here, take a look at this...
>(He takes from his pocket a small toy robot, and pops it on a nearby table.
>As soon as the toy sees Troi, it starts crooning about a "Lady in Red")
>Troi:    What is it?
>Master:  It's a Borg I found. It had attempted to assimilate some late 20th
>    century Earth music, and it never recovered. I had to tinker with it
>    of course, and make it easier to carry, but it taught me a lot about
>    the Borg and their weaknesses. I call it Chris.
>Troi:    Chris the Borg!?!?!?!?!?! I would of thought that the Cypriots had
done away with him after his last appearance in Limassol! I can't believe it!
(The pain of those terrible moments overwhelms her empathic sensitivities as 
she slumps to the floor.)
>
>
>
>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: david@donald.concordia.ca (David Gaudine)
Subject: Re: This whole Ace thing.
Organization:  ORGANIZATION!! HERE? You must be kidding
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:51:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.202741.8256@lsa.umich.edu> kausch@med.umich.edu (David Kausch) writes:
>
>...I may as well join the band wagon.  What I don't understand is why Ace?
>If you want to pick on companions, why not try Mel?

We already did, ad nauseum.  It was time to move on.

>                                                      Peri would be far too
>easy to roast, so I'll skip her.

Why?  Nobody else did.

>                                  OK, get your flame-throwers pointed at me,
>the most inconsistant companion I can think of is Nyssa.  I find her and
>interesting one in that she's headstrong one moment and cringing the next,
>sometimes she can't figure which way is up, but in Terminus, for example,
>she's suddenly finds a solution to the biggest plague in the universe.  Do
>the script writers flip a coin before each episode or what?

Leave her alone, she's cute.  I picked her second, after Romana II.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Gaudine, Concordia University, Montreal.  david@donald.concordia.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.startrek.misc,alt.startrek.creative