HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Reeves History/NYG Fans Take Heart!
Date: 26 Jan 93 00:21:25 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

Now that we're all starting to settle in to the idea that Dan Reeves is
going to be the next Giants coach, here's some info that should help
those who don't feel too at ease as of yet:

Reeves has done head coaching duty for 11 years (all with the Broncos)
and is fourth on the active coaching list behind Shula, Knox and Gibbs.
 He's tied at 14th with Don Coryell on the all-time victory list for
head coaches.

Career win/loss record:  117 wins 79 loses 1 tie

He became head coach of the Broncos in February of '81, after spending
his entire pro career both as a player and coach at Dallas
(Hmmm...learn under Tom Landry ya say?).  He was signed as a free agent
RUNNING BACK (hey Rodney and Gerrod...check it out!) in 1965 and became
a member of the coaching staff in 1970 when he undertook the roll as
player-coach for two seasons (Bill Russell!! Oops wrong sport...).  In
'72, he became the OFFENSIVE BACKFIELD COACH (yikes! and we were all
worried that he was strictly a pass minded coach...think again!!).  In
'77, he became the offensive coordinator.  

So I say to all ye disillusioned Giant fans...take heart!  Of course,
there's still George "I'm In Control Here!" Young to contend with, but
let's hope Dan can talk some sense into Mr. Young.  Here's wishin' you
the best Dan!!!

P.S.
Although I'm pulling big time for the 'boyz in Pasadena, I can't help
but make one point here...we may not have got Wannstedt and JJ was
still a long way off from the Landry/Reeves days, but wouldn't it be
peachy to kick some 'boyz butt next year with an ex-player/coach from
Dallas?   YES!!!!

Mike Colburn                         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dartmouth-Hitchcock                  "Pulu-see-ba-goomba" -- Gilligan 
Medical Center                       =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lebanon, New Hampshire  03756        :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Land of the Giants 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown)
Subject: Re: Perfect Dolphins Trivia
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 14:38:17 GMT

In article <JOHNDOE93Jan26.185306@samadams.inmet> johndoe@inmet.com (Bus error - core dumped) writes:
>In article <1993Jan26.075416.2506@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
>
>now, somre more of my own additonal trivia:
>
>A) who was the only team to beat the raiders in 1976?
>B) who was the only team to beat the 49ers in 1984 (the year they beat the
>   dolphins in the super bowl)?

Wasn't it the Browns? Didn't they beat both the teams that played in
the SuperBowl that year?


>C) who was the only team to beat the bears in 1985?
>
>D) bonus:  who was the only team to beat the redskins in strike-shortened 1982?


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pajerek@telstar.kodak.com (Don Pajerek)
Subject: Re: Miami: AFC pretender? Boy are you Stupid!
Reply-To: pajerek@telstar.kodak.com (Don Pajerek)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. - Telstar
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:17:38 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.141415.15201@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>You also speak emotionally instead of intelligently.   The Bills have won
>more games over the past 5 years.  But, couple of questions...
>First, who has won more SuperBowls???   Not Levy 
>Who has more overall victories in his career???  Not Levy
>Whose team won their division this year???  Not Levy's...
>

And whose team is in the Super Bowl this year? And last year?
And the year before that?

The comparison of career victories is unfair, considering the number of years
that Shula has been a head coach.

>David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye


Don Pajerek

Standard disclaimers apply.
From: cs92pr@cen.ex.ac.uk (P.Rushworth)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: My thoughts on the Super Bowl...
Date: 25 Jan 93 10:44:48 GMT
Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK


I am NOT a boyz fan.....


THERE IS NO WAY THAT THE BILLS WILL EVEN GET CLOSE TO THE NFC CHAMPIONS.

Thank you.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Subject: Re: Emmitt Smith = Homer Simpson
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:36:48 GMT
Reply-To: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Organization: BNR, Inc.

In article <1k8v98INNb2m@mojo.eng.umd.edu>, edquist@eng.umd.edu (Karl T. Edquist) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> It struck me the other day as I was watching an interview with Emmitt Smith that
|> he's the spittin' image of Homer Simpson.  You know, the beady eyes and long forehead.
|> Just thought I'd interject that.  
|> 
|> 
|> Karl



         You ever noticed how much Jim Kelly looks like Gomer Pyle?  
-- 
I am just a COWBOY, lonesome on the trail              |  Pat Power
Lord, I'm just thinking about a certain female...      |  My opinions only
Roll me over and turn me around, let me keep spinning  |  
     til I hit the ground.                             |  Da Boyz are back!!
Roll me over and let me go, running free with          |
     the BUFFALO.   - Thin Lizzy, "The Cowboy Song"    |
From: ajay@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ajay Shekhawat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Who now for Oilers D-Coord?
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:37:03 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University at Buffalo, Dept. of Computer Science

ckoontz@aud.alcatel.com writes:
: OK, now that Wade Phillips has accepted the head coaching job in
: Denver, who is the leading candidate for the defensive coordinator
: job with the Oilers?
: 
: Any word out of Houson on this one?
: 
: --
: Carl Koontz
: ckoontz@rdxsun40.aud.alcatel.com

Rumor has it that Buddy Ryan might get that job.

--
Ajay Shekhawat 		
ajay@cs.Buffalo.EDU
From: mrn3@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MATTHEW R. NARBY)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NEED HELP FOR POLISCI COURSE -Rational PRO&CON WHO WILL WIN!!
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:02:33 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1993Jan21.200229.12848@ee.rochester.edu>, streb@ee.rochester.edu (Ch
uck S.) writes:
>I am taken a pol sci course and the goal of two teams is to win!
>what are some indicators that give one team the advantage over the
>other.
>Fill in under subject ,please do not erase other's comments!
>
>1) pro's for bill's
>Jim kelly has something to prove.
>Injuries
Thomas, Reed, Defense that has given up 18 points in eleven quatrers in
playoffs (incl. overtime vs. Oilers)
>
>2) con's for bill's
>Wriech is better than kelly and is benched.
Reich is good, but is JOB is that of a BACKUP QB, not a starter.
Which Bills team will play? The one that lost to the Colts, or the one that
beat the 49ers?>

>3) pro's for cowboy's
>
>4) con's for cowboy's
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>=  Chuck Streb   lookin' before leapin'     =
>=                                           =
>=  internet streb@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu   =
>
-- 
-Matthew Narby-
Buffalo BILLS
One Bills Drive
Orchard Park, N.Y.
Colors: Red, Blue and White
Rich Stadium
(80,020) NFL
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Kall@Mayo.EDU
Subject: To all BILLS Fans
Reply-To: Kall@Mayo.EDU
Organization: Mayo Foundation
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 18:11:50 GMT

I don't know about all Bills fans, but I kind of like having
the Bills being the underdog, reading all the 'pro-Dallas'
stuff in the newspaper and on the net.  It'll just make
the Bills victory in the SuperBowl this year that much
more sweet!!!!!

The keys to the SB are the same as with the Miami game:
get in the QBs face and don't turn the ball over!!

Too all Dallas fans: This was for Bills fans. This was not
meant for your woofing.  You can woof or sob after the game.

Are there any other SE Minnesota Bills fans??




\------------------------------------------------------------\
 \   Bruce Kall                \  Internet:   Kall@Mayo.edu   \
  \   Mayo Clinic (Foundation)  \  Phone: (507)-255-4768       \
   \   Rochester, MN 55905       \                              \
    \                             \                              \
     \   Go BILLS!!!!!!!!!!!       \  Go BILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!        \
      \------------------------------------------------------------\

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bodom@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Brian Odom)
Subject: Re: Do you know who had most All Maddens?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:57:09 GMT

In <93026.234358RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu> <RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>There was a tie for the team with the most All-Madden's this year between
>Minnesota and San Francisco (with 8 apiece) which is fine by me since
>they're my two fav teams (Minn being #1).

>1.  (tie)
>    Minnesota  (8)   with Noga too!!!!
>    San Francisco  (8)

>and the others:
>    Dallas (7)
>    Philadelphia (7)
>    Houston (4)
>    Washington (4)
>    Detroit (3)
>    Kansas City (3)
>    NY Giants (2)
>    Atlanta (2)
>    New Orleans (2)
>    L.A. Rams (1)
>    Chicago (1)
>    Denver (1)


> Oh yeah, if you're out there reading this Fat John, your Bills got NOTHING!  N
>UDDING!  NOT TING!  ZERO!

> I apologize to the rest of the Bills fans but Fat John is a conceited dumb-ass
> haole who's likes to pretend he knows football.

Looks like NFC dominance once again.  Then again, that's the only conference
that Fat John ever watches.  And to think, he was once the coach of the 
Raiders....
From: w0333@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: dallas over bills
Date: 26 Jan 93 18:35:54 EST
Organization:  Wright State University 

> Don't forget that the team that had to make the 32 pt comeback was the Bills
> backup team, who also won the next week over Pittsburg, the "Best" team in the
> AFC. Also, was it the consistant Cowwimps who lost to the Eagles? Well,
> rather, embarrassed by the Eagles? Didn't the Cowgirls also lose to the
> Cardnals? And who had to play the #2 toughest schedule? wasn't the Cowwimps. I
> agree that Dallas has a good Defense, but don't forget that they only went up
> against a very limited few quality offenses. The Seahawks, Denver, and Raiders
> do not have quality offenses, so the "rating" system is somewhat off.
> Remember, it rates on sheer numbers, not quality faced.
>  
> -- 
> -Matthew Narby-
> Buffalo BILLS
The Cowboys did NOT lose to the Cardinals.

Also, how do you figure that the Cowboys played a weak schedule?  How many
divisions had THREE teams in the divisional playoffs?  (The round with only
FOUR teams per conference left)!  How many divisions have won the last two
consecutive Super Bowls and will make it three on Sunday?  The 49ers are
somehow not a quality offense?  Point is, like them or not, they played a tough
schedule!!  AND WON!!

Also, as numbers go, the schedule toughness ratings are based on last year's
numbers, not the current season's, so there's a numbers flaw to every argument. 
Let's wait to see how its settled on the field and then let us Cowboy fans
gloat!

Bob Mack
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Some More Trivia
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:04:23 GMT

>(Satish Nair) writes:
>>8. Who is the only QB to actually CATCH a pass in a Super Bowl?

John Elway, first or second play in the SB vs Washington.


hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde) writes:
>13. The city of New Orleans has hosted seven SB's.  How many were in the
>    Superdome?  What stadium hosted the others?

It's no big deal, cuz I have the full list.  I posted it, too, so everyone
should know this by now!

IV	Tulane Stadiom, N.O.		KC 23, Minn 7		1/11/1970
VI	Tulane Stadiom, N.O.		Dal 24, Mia 3		1/16/1972
IX	Tulane Stadiom, N.O.		Pitt 16, Minn 6		1/12/1975
XII	Louisiana Superdome, N.O.	Dal 27, Den 10		1/15/1978
XV	Louisiana Superdome, N.O.	Oak 27, Phil 10		1/25/1981
XX	Louisiana Superdome, N.O.	Chi 46, NE 10		1/26/1986
XIV	Louisiana Superdome, N.O.	SF 55, Den 10		1/28/1990


--Gidi


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rdetweil@boi.hp.com (Richard Detweiler)
Subject: Re: Wanted/Predictions
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 22:24:24 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise Printer Division


Buffalo: 24
Dallas:  13

Go Bills!!!
From: jackg@miko.EBay.Sun.COM (Jack Guydish)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas vs. SF, N*iced* Notes
Date: 21 Jan 1993 23:45:51 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: miko.ebay.sun.com

In article <1jn9qkINNlpl@spim.mti.sgi.com> timl@mti.sgi.com writes:
>In article <1jn26dINNp2l@news.aero.org>, mas@aero.org (Marcus A.Shaw) writes:
>
>Charles Haley had no sacks BUT he was the key guy in one of the key plays of
>the game. Now I have to go back and review the tape to make sure it was him but
>wasn't he the guy that was held on the Rice (non)TD pass? So on this play if he
>was held (like he was) then the TD is nullified, and if he is not held then
>Young
>most likely doesn't get the pass to Rice. If he did not manage to beat
>Macintire
>on this play the 9er's would have had 7 more points and this game would have
>been
>much different. The Cowboys would have been playing catch-up instead of the
>9'ers.
>
>So, that play (if it was him that got held) was as good as a sack. -10yards and
>no TD!

It was actually Russel Maryland that was held by McIntire.  I believe Summerall
or Madden at the time said Haley, but it was Maryland.

>Ricky Watters does look great but he is a rookie and he is very young. Hence I
>am
>not supprised that he fumbled in the pressure game. Emmit's experience and
>Ricky's
>inexperience shows here. But I'm happy to keep Ricky. (understatement!) With
>more
>playing time under his belt I'm confident he will be a real star in years to
>come.
>He was very mad at himself for losing the ball. The veterans were trying to calm
>him
>down on the sidelines.

I think it was good to see someone upset at themselves for a change.  It
always pisses me off when someone (on a team I'm rooting for) fumbles and
just jogs off the field like they couldn't care less.  I do think however
that it was crucial to have the vets calm him down before he got back in 
there.

-Jack
From: gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM (George W. Pogue (Bill ))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Trivia Answer #1
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 14:09:26 EST
Reply-To: gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM
Organization: Deep In The Heart Of The South!


  Question: What number did former president Gerald Ford wear when he played
            center for Michigan?

  Answer: 48

  bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Buy & Sell American When Possible!  <->  All Standard Disclaimers Do Apply!
 gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM  (George W. Pogue  (Bill ))
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu (J. Morgan Morris)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Where the Cowboy fans?
Date: 27 Jan 93 02:12:48 GMT
Organization: Georgia State University

"Michael D. Goettsche" <mg5c+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>Ok, I put out a post a couple days ago asking for what you guys think
>the score of the game will be, and so far, I've gotten 6 from Bills
>fans, and only ONE from Cowboys fans.  Where are you, Cowboys fans? 
>Send your predictions in!!!!

>DA FLAV

As an avid Cowboy fan for many years, I also have a history
of losing bets on them. I tend to keep my mouth shut before
the game, so that I don't jinx them. It worked quite
well for the Eagles and 49ers games....

Later,
Morgan


-- 

John Morgan Morris
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
Georgia State University
University Plaza
Atlanta, GA. 30303-3083

Internet: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu
Telephone: (404) 651-2253
FAX: (404) 651-2246
From: v077mdph@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills Suck!
Date: 26 Jan 93 19:12:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1993Jan25.214548.21239@math.ucla.edu>, rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.
>edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes...
>I've heard a lot of whining about the Bills winning this one.
>No Way.
>Kelly sucks... he spends more time looking over his shoulder at Reich's
>clipboard, than he spends looking at the Defensive Backs coverages.
>Bruce Smith sucks... all he's interested in is looking good. If he gets
>1 sack, he won't even try the rest of the game. He'll get his big $$.
>Thomas sucks... he'll be two busy worring about Emmitt vs. Thurman to
>remember the plays. 'Hey where is my playbook? Must've left in in my helmet!'
>Andre Reed... is just looking to get traded.
>Loften... is looking for his wheelchair.
>Beebee.... is looking at Reich's clipboard.
>(None of the recievers are looking for the ball.)
>Bennet, Conlan, and Talley... are argueing whose the most over(and under)
>rated of the three.
>Tasker.... has been nominated to so many all-etc teams that he couldn't
>care less about the Super Bowl.
>Jones..... is looking for an INT so bad, he'll probably get burned for at
>least two touchdowns.

	You are an asshole.  All you know about these players is what the
national media chooses to say about them.  You've never met them.  Your
opinions mean less than a pile of buffalo shit on a Texas roadside.  Do you
really think people will want to read on after all that spleen you just vented?
I, for one, haven't, and won't.  If you have anything to add to the discussion,
or any humorous, good-natured woofing, post.  Otherwise, I'll skip your stupid
posts, and hopefully other people will, too.

Snoopy
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ajj@zycor.lgc.com (Andrew Jackson)
Subject: Super Bowl prediction
Organization: Landmark/Zycor   Austin, Texas
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:12:24 GMT

Well gang,

I cannot stand the two week gap between the Conference Championship
games and the Super Bowl!

After the Championship games, I favored Dallas by 6. I'm going to
slice the margin to 3 points. The main reason is that the Bills
(unlike the past two Super Bowls) are not talking trash, but seem
to be concentrating on the game. I had a feeling that the Bills would
go on a roll following "THE HALF" against Houston, but then they
killed the Raiders two years ago.

However, I'm still favoring Dallas because (as mentioned previously)
they have the advantage in coaching. Another point (mentioned by others)
is Dallas' ability to hold on to the ball. If they can do what the
Giants did two years ago, the game should belong to Dallas.

Regardless, this has the makings of a very good game. Please, let it
be so!

BTW: I don't mind Garth singing the national anthem. The anthem is
not a country song and it lasts only a few minutes. It's not like
its Roseanne singing it  >=P.

Cheers & LET'S GET THE SHOW THE ROAD!

========================================================================
Andrew J. Jackson                     voice: 512-292-2323
Landmark/Zycor, Inc.                  fax  : 512-280-6731
220 Foremost Dr.                      email: ajackson@zycor.lgc.com
Austin, TX 78745
========================================================================
From: schmke@cco.caltech.edu (Kevin Todd Schmidt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: JGH computer predictions: a curious algorithm
Date: 22 Jan 1993 23:27:40 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

John Hilton <hilton@turtle.psych.um.edu> writes:

>> 1     Cowboys       91      2
>> 2     49ers         90      1
>> 3     Eagles        86      3
>> 4     Saints        85      4
>> 5     Vikings       79      5
>> 6     Redskins      74      7
>> 7     Dolphins      72      6
>> 8     Bills         71      8
>> 9     Oilers        66      9
>>10     Chargers      60     10

>This is somewhat intriguing.  According to Mr. Heim's algorithm,
>Buffalo is mired in 8th place.  Looking at Buffalo's record against
>the teams positioned ahead of them, they are a combined 4-1, with
>victories against the 49ers, Saints, and 2 victories against Miami. 
>Their only loss was in the Miami game and again, Buffalo's record
>against Miami is 2-1.  Furthermore, Buffalo has a chanceto beat one more
>team, Dallas, in the superbowl.  It would seem that a lengthy off-season
>might give Mr. Heim the opportunity he needs to fine-tune his algorithm
>to better reflect the relative strength
>of each team.

But if they only have one loss to teams ahead of them then their
other losses, 4 of them are to teams below them.  This is probably
why they are "mired" in eigth place.

So should Buffalo be higher or not.  They don't seem to perform
well against teams below them.

Kevin
-- 
Jet Propulsion Laboratory | schmke@cco.caltech.edu
4800 Oak Grove Dr.        | schmidt@spc5.jpl.nasa.gov
M/S 525-3684              |
Pasadena, CA  91109       |
From: tap1040@venus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ridiculous Halftimes
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:13:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
NNTP-Posting-Host: venus.tamu.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1k2ie3INN8ea@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>, statesse@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Scott E States) writes...
-> **note**  If that idiot Garth (I love men) Brooks, or Billy Ray
->           (I'm a white man with no rythm at all) Cyrus perform
-> 	  at the Superbowl, I swear to God I'll never watch another
-> 	  football game for as long as I live.  And I hope some others
-> 	  follow my example!!
-> 

-Well, it looks as if you've seen your last football game - i heard on the radio  
-today that Garth will be singing the national anthem.  Sorry about your luck, I  
-couldn't live without football - even if they let Sinead O'Connor do the  
-national anthem! (I would definitely be able to put the "mute" button to good  
-use though! )

Not only that, but last night on Jay Leno, Marlee Matlin said she is going
to *sign* the national anthem as Garth sings it!


___________________________________________________________________________
Tracy Persky           Texas A&M University           tap1040@zeus.tamu.edu

John Madden: "There's a good sign.  Troy Aikman putting his pants back on."
Pat Summerall: "That's ALWAYS a good sign."  (RFK Stadium, Nov. 24, 1991)
From: mrn3@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MATTHEW R. NARBY)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Emmitt on Arsineo
Date: 28 Jan 93 04:15:23 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

What's this about Emmitt Smith being on the Arsineo Hall show and destroying
the Bills? I heard that he talked a lot of trash. Is this true? Objective
opinions only! I don't think anyone should have the unique arrogence to say
"Yeah, Emmitt said that the Bills suck, and he was completely honest."
If so, does he know the name Louis Oliver? Oh, well, I guess the hype gets to
Dallas after all!
 
-- 
-Matthew Narby-
Buffalo BILLS
One Bills Drive
Orchard Park, N.Y.
Colors: Red, Blue and White
Rich Stadium
(80,020) NFL
From: tsv@Unify.com (Tim Vannaman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: COWGIRLS
Date: 20 Jan 93 23:10:43 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Unify Corporation (Sacramento)

In article <1993Jan19.055405.14903@math.ucla.edu>, ashamam@oak.math.ucla.edu (Asher Shamam) writes:
> They suck dick.
> They are all fags like Hamish.

_AND_  yourself.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ajay@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ajay Shekhawat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: It's a Horse Race!
Date: 21 Jan 93 14:07:19 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo, Dept. of Computer Science

bsmith@osf.org writes:
: If I were handicapping the SB in horse racing terms, here's what I'd have to
: say:
: 
: [deleted for brevity]
:
: Okay, I grew up in the shadow of Aqueduct Race Track  -- so sue me!
: I'll take the Bills with points!
: 
: Bruce A. Smith
:       ^^

You're not alone; Bill Clinton's mom is also betting on the Bills!

Ajay

--
ajay@cs.Buffalo.EDU				
        ^^^^^^^------ HOME OF THE 199[012] AFC CHAMPIONS