HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 10:13:47 CDT
From:         "Paul Pratte" <PRATTE@UMSLVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      8mm drives with VMTAPE

Since I was receiving several questions off the list about 8mm drives
I will reask my question with the specifics on the drives and C.U.


The problem I am having is how to get VMTAPE to request the mounts
only on drives 390 and 391 which are the 8mm's and not 380-383
which are the 3420 reels.

My configuration consists of a BusTech SCA box which handles SCSI to
Bus and Tag translation while providing 3422 emulation. Attached
to the SCA are 2 8500 Exabyte tape drives.  VMTAPE only
knows these as 1600/6250 9Track devices and can not distinguish
between them. Is there an exit that can modify what real drive
is being requested ?  Is there a way to pool devices logically
and request mounts as we do with volsers ?



Any help would be appreciated.

Paul Pratte
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 10:59:57 EDT
From:         "Katherine Faella" <KMF@URIACC.BITNET>
Subject:      IUCV MAXCONN Options
X-To:         "VM Shared File System (SFS) forum" <SFS-L@SEARN.BITNET>,
              L-VMCTR@AKRONVM.BITNET

Thanks to Scott Nettleship from CMS/SFS in Endicott for helping me to
locate the source of my recent problems with IUCV connections and the
SFS.  If you are running with Systems Center's VMSECURE you will want
to take note of the following.  For ESA 1.0 ESA Feature, the CP Planning
and Administration Guide states that the default number for the
maximum allowed IUCV/APPC connections is 16.  The maximum can be changed
by specifying a value on the OPTION statement of a virtual machine's
directory.  We had not specified any value and therefore expected the
default to be 16.  However, VMSECURE was making the default 4 which
was not enough connections when running many applications under the SFS.
There is a VMSECURE CONFIG option to specify what you wish the default
to be which takes effect after a source start.  We will be changing ours
to 16 and I fully expect that our problems is this area will cease.

Again I want to thank Scott for his help, online and offline, which allowed
us to quickly determine that our maximum connections was 4.

Katherine Faella                 Bitnet:   KMF@URIACC
Academic Computer Center         Internet: KMF@URIACC.URI.EDU
University of Rhode Island
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.l-vmctr
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 11:57:56 EDT
From:         Mike Ramundo <SYSMRR@ALBNYVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: 8mm drives with VMTAPE

Paul

    put the 8mm tapes in a separate Tapepool  w/wo autopick
    restricted to certain userids/jobids and dsns

    don't leave the 8mm drives 'up'
    instead do a VMTAPE ALLOCATE  for the real device you want
    before doing the mount ( see also 'reserve' command )
Mike R.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: European Space Agency
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:01:30 CET
From:         A6@ESOC.BITNET
Subject: Mailer misuse + Gateway to SMTP

I have a couple of problems to solve with Mailer 2.08.

- I want to use our Mailer as a gateway between the BSMTP and the SMTP
  (EARN-INTERNET) world. How can I achieve this?

- Some users on nodes not belonging to the European Space Agency, but
  connected to us via RSCS (NJE) misuse our Mailer in order to access
  EARN (which they are not allowed to because they are not members!).
  What they do is mail to
            userid%ext_node@ESOC.BITNET
  were ext_node is a none EARN node. How can I stop this?

Thanks for your help.

Regards Hermann Schneider
        Network Coordinator
        ESOC (European Space Agency's Operations Centre)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 01:20:23 EDT
From:         Roger Fajman <RAF@NIHCU.BITNET>
Subject: Re: MAILER and Netdata (the other possiblity..)

> > because BITNET can't agree on how to translate
> > between ASCII and EBCDIC.
>
> It isn't just BITNET, of course.  It's all EBCDIC systems in the world,
> even those that are only on the Internet, and it's also all systems that
> use national variants of ISO 646 to the exclusion of USASCII.
>                                        John

Yes, but you have a lot more control when you do the translation and
use the result on the same host.

MIME discourages the use of the national variants of ISO 646 (other
than US ASCII) in email.  The ISO 8859-n family is recommended instead.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 09:03:19 +0200
From:         "Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL)" <fontaine@SRI.UCL.AC.BE>
Subject:      Re: Long lines, MIME, EBCDIC, etc : random thoughts.

On Mon, 6 Apr 92 16:49:21 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>It's like complaining to owners of
>diesel cars  that they  are not  using the new  standardized type  of gas
>defined by some new norm.
I see it more like one manufacturer of appliances deciding to build its stuff
to work on 163V AC, 78Hz.. 8-)

>You are making  the same mistake again. In practice,  people use variants
>of both ASCII and EBCDIC, and  thus there CANNOT be a correct translation
>table, even with all the standards in the planet, until everyone uses the
>same variant.
There is a difference. When people do use (illegal in Internet context)
variants of ASCII and exchange mail or data in a 'ASCII only' context,
what they see on their screen is not always correct. But the underlying
codes have not been changed, so recovery is possible. If the data has
been translated between some unknown variant of ISO646 and some unknown
IBM code page, things have a fat chance to be mangled beyond recognition.
Translation, especially when not under direct control of one end, is *evil*.

>As you  know there have  been long debates  within IBM user  groups about
>EBCDIC codepages  and so  on. The  reason it  took so  long and  not much
>happened is that there is no easy solution.
At least this debate resulted in a large consensus about what network EBCDIC
should be, and this result was written down in a outstanding document edited
by Edwin Hart. The de facto translation table used at many places is indeed
the same as the one resulting from the 'AEILS' effort, at least for the
first half of ISO8859-1. But IBM refused to bless this code page, so it is
actually impossible to use it on IBM equipment like 3x7x controllers and
terminals. So indeed not much happened. Who is at fault ??    /AF
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 11:00:38 MEZ
From:         Martin Preusser <HRZ130@DE0HRZ1A.BITNET>
Subject:      Mailer tag

I'm postmaster in our institution and have the following problem:
we supply a neighbour node not running mailer. Mail to users of this
node is spooled to rscs. rscs detects an invalid tag, changes the
files status to "userhold" and ignores it for the future. my own mail
to this node is well routed. most of the bad mail is listserver mail
with vm systems as its origin.

"RDRLIST" shows an origin node name containing blanks. when reading
the spool file block, there is nothing abnormal.

* following tag is shown when attaching a bad file:
tag query file 307
S&F DE0WTZ1A KREG05HB 50 DEARN    MAILER    3/26/92 0:43:27 0466 NJ2O QU-DIST
37AA09 AA 00000033 40 0000 00000000
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:10:22

* following tag is shown when attaching my own mail to node de0wtz1a:
tag query file 313
DE0WTZ1A KREG05HB 50 W=KREG05HB ENQMSG=NO SENTMSG=NO FINALMSG=NO
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:10:35

* in menu "rdrlist" the second file appears with bad user and node
* values:

 HRZ130   RDRLIST  A0  V 108  Trunc=108 Size=5 Line=1 Col=1 Alt=0
Cmd   Filename Filetype Class User  at Node     Hold  Records  Date      Time
      SCHMITT  SCRIPT   PUN A HRZ130   DE0HRZ1A NONE       54 03/20    10:25:37
      GAMES-L  MAIL     PUN M RN    MA HB 50 DE USER       51 03/26    01:43:55
      TEST     FORTRAN  PRT A HRZ130   DE0HRZ1A NONE      391 04/14    14:49:20
      HRZ130   MAIL     PUN M MAILER   DE0HRZ1A NONE        7 04/14    15:16:35
      NETSERV  FILELIST PUN A NETSERV  DEARN    NONE      157 04/15    15:42:22












1= Help      2= Refresh  3= Quit      4= Sort(type) 5= Sort(date) 6= Sort(user)
7= Backward  8= Forward  9= Receive  10=           11= Peek      12= Cursor

====>
                                                            X E D I T  1 File

We are running MAILER 2.08 and RSCS V2R3.
Mailer seems to set an invalid tag. I would be glad for any help.


Martin Preusser
HRZ130@DE0HRZ1A
HRZ130@vm.hrz.uni-essen.de
Tel.: 0201/1832176
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 18:30:36 -0400
From:         jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: Mailer tag
Comments: To: Crosswell Mailer <XMAILER@uga.cc.uga.edu>
              16 Apr 92 11:00:38 -0500. <9204160911.AA05228@Princeton.EDU>

> I'm postmaster in our institution and have the following problem:
> we supply a neighbour node not running mailer. Mail to users of this
> node is spooled to rscs. rscs detects an invalid tag, changes the
> files status to "userhold" and ignores it for the future. my own mail
> to this node is well routed. most of the bad mail is listserver mail
> with vm systems as its origin.
>
> "RDRLIST" shows an origin node name containing blanks. when reading
> the spool file block, there is nothing abnormal.
>
> * following tag is shown when attaching a bad file:
> tag query file 307
> S&F DE0WTZ1A KREG05HB 50 DEARN    MAILER    3/26/92 0:43:27 0466 NJ2O QU-DIST
> 37AA09 AA 00000033 40 0000 00000000
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:10:22

This is an RSCS store and forward tag.  It is not the final tag
(which I believe would start at the DE0WTZ1A).  The S&F tag is left
on the file because RSCS had a problem processing it.

  John
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 11:04:19 EST
From:         Alnoor Dhanani <NUR@HARVARDA.BITNET>
Subject:      Mailer User Exits

Where can I get information on how to write a local user exit?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 17:29:00 EDT
From:         "John F. Chandler" <PEPMNT@CFAAMP.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Mailer tag

> "RDRLIST" shows an origin node name containing blanks. when reading
> the spool file block, there is nothing abnormal.

Nothing other than the tag, you mean?  The DIAG that reads the SFB
also returns the tag.

> * following tag is shown when attaching a bad file:
> tag query file 307
> S&F DE0WTZ1A KREG05HB 50 DEARN    MAILER    3/26/92 0:43:27 0466 NJ2O QU-DIST
> 37AA09 AA 00000033 40 0000 00000000
...
> Filename Filetype Class User  at Node     Hold  Records  Date   Time
> GAMES-L  MAIL     PUN M RN    MA HB 50 DE USER       51 03/26 01:43:55

Clearly, the tag has been clobbered, but it's not clear whether the
information in the tag is random garbage or is tied in with the mail
file itself.  For example, the string "DE0WTZ1A KREG05HB 50" would be
fine as a tag, assuming the intended recipient is KREG05HB.  Similarly,
"DEARN    MAILER    3/26/92 0:43:27" could very well be part of the tag
on the incoming file that Mailer received (did the file pass through
DEARN about 1 hour before arriving at your Mailer?).  The "QU-DIST"
looks like the FORM specified by LISTSERV at some point.  Some of these
details could be checked by consulting the RSCS and MAILER logs.

> * following tag is shown when attaching my own mail to node de0wtz1a:
> tag query file 313
> DE0WTZ1A KREG05HB 50 W=KREG05HB ENQMSG=NO SENTMSG=NO FINALMSG=NO

Sent through your Mailer?  Does *all* mail sent by LISTSERV's for
the neighboring site get clobbered?  Just mail sent by the LISTSERV
at DEARN?  Details like this could be very important in pinning down
the problem.
                                       John
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 16:54:02 -0400
From:         jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: Mailer User Exits
Comments: To: Crosswell Mailer <XMAILER@uga.cc.uga.edu>
              13 Apr 92 11:04:19 -0500. <9204131614.AA03753@Princeton.EDU>

> Where can I get information on how to write a local user exit?

The only documentation for this is the code.  Look at one of the
supplied exits.

   john
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:32:19 CDT
From:         Christian.J.Reichetzeder@AWIIMC12.IMC.UNIVIE.AC.AT
Subject: Re: Mailer misuse + Gateway to SMTP

On Wed, 8 Apr 92 15:01:30 CET <A6@ESOC> said:
>
>I have a couple of problems to solve with Mailer 2.08.
Not only ... but see below.
>
>- I want to use our Mailer as a gateway between the BSMTP and the SMTP
>  (EARN-INTERNET) world. How can I achieve this?
The gateway  is SMTP, Mailer  isn't designed as gateway.  As for the  "how to"
it's simple  but you can't get  everything (as usual). Let  *either* SMTP *or*
MAILER send  to the other for  unknown hosts (for mailer  that's the *DEFAULT*
entry in outgoing/domains).  Specify the one with the default  as your primary
MTA. Everything else works automagically.
You can do some extra work and process the DOMAIN NAMES before MGing and point
all named domains to your SMTP if Internet connection is indicated.

>
>- Some users on nodes not belonging to the European Space Agency, but
>  connected to us via RSCS (NJE) misuse our Mailer in order to access
>  EARN (which they are not allowed to because they are not members!).
>  What they do is mail to
>            userid%ext_node@ESOC.BITNET
>  were ext_node is a none EARN node. How can I stop this?
I may be dense or it may be  the sinusitis affecting my brains but it seems to
me that "userid%ext_node" makes  only sense when sent FROM EARN  to one of the
ext_nodes, the  misuse may be that  your ext_node users pass  addresses in the
above form so that they are reachable via EARN.
Anyway when you  connect two NJE networks  (EARN and the ext_nodes)  and use a
single RSCS (so  that *your* users can  easily send to both) you  have to face
the above problem.

I  think a  q&d circumvention  is  possible for  the price  of two  additional
mailers and an additonal Received: line (probably two records) in the outgoing
headers. Two "network"  mailers which accept/send only  from/to their network.
One local mailer which can be used only by your local users.
Of course you may not default outgoing to RSCSVER.

Christian
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 16:30:49 EDT
From:         Abdel Gharzita <TECHMAN@PACEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      origins...

As we speak the same  piece of mail from
 abhijit%sware.com@mathcs.emory.edu
comes in every 15 seconds or so. We keep purging the files, but does not
end the problem. the postmaster at that node was contacted, but have not
heard from him.
tried to use the ORIGINS in mailer profile, but that works only for local
users.
Is there a way to purge these mail automaticly  using mailer ??
Thanks
AG
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:28:00 EDT
From:         "John F. Chandler" <PEPMNT@CFAAMP.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: MAILER and Netdata (the other possiblity..)

> Perhaps you want to approach the MIME working group to tell them that
> MIME should be changed

Yes, of course.  I think it should be changed.  A simple addition to the
mail header would provide validation for the 14 questionable characters
in USASCII that are not uniquely translated everywhere.  I won't bother
discussing the form of such a change in this forum, however -- as I said
before, this is the wrong place for that discussion.

> I refuse to do that.

I've already written to one of the authors of the MIME document.

> because BITNET can't agree on how to translate
> between ASCII and EBCDIC.

It isn't just BITNET, of course.  It's all EBCDIC systems in the world,
even those that are only on the Internet, and it's also all systems that
use national variants of ISO 646 to the exclusion of USASCII.
                                       John
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 16:28:22 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Mailer misuse + Gateway to SMTP
              8 Apr 1992 15:01:30 CET from The Crosswell Mailer List
              <XMAILER@FINHUTC>

On Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:01:30 CET A6@ESOC said:

>- Some users  on nodes not belonging  to the European Space  Agency, but
>  connected to  us via RSCS (NJE)  misuse our Mailer in  order to access
>  EARN (which  they are not allowed  to because they are  not members!).
>  What they do is mail to
>            userid%ext_node@ESOC.BITNET were ext_node is a none EARN
>  node. How can I stop this?

You can't. They  have thousands of BITNET nodes to  choose from for using
this trick. The only thing you can do  is set up a special exit for their
node in your mailer  to prevent mail from being sent  back (I assume they
are not in the RSCS tables anywhere else).

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.uigis-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:20:08 MET
              List" <UIGIS-L@UBVM.BITNET>
From:         "Fabio Paterno'" <PATERNO@ICNUCEVM.CNUCE.CNR.IT>
Subject:      Add me

Could you please add me to your mailing list.
Thank you.






Fabio Paterno'
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 12:01:59 LCL
From:         KID06@PLWRAE51.BITNET
Subject:      Fractals in Economy?

Could you tell me about fractals in economy?
I know about the article in Mondelbrot's book.
I appreciate the answer!

Radek Pruchnik
KID06@PLWRAE51.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 17:14:58 CDT
From:         C549597@UMCVMB.BITNET
Subject:      Fractint for Sun

I think I've seen this question discussed here, but don't recall the
answer.   Is is there a version of Fractint that will run on SUN
workstations?  If so, where can I ftp it?  Is it in source or executable
form?

Thanks, Greg Petroski
c549597@umcvmb
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL2]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 14:59:28 MEZ
From:         sven tuerpe <tuerpe@AIX520.INFORMATIK.UNI-LEIPZIG.DE>
Subject:      Re: I need information about books...
X-To:         FRAC-L%GITVM1.bitnet@IBM4381.RZ.UNI-LEIPZIG.DE
              "Israel Fonseca Neto" at Apr 13, 92 1:24 pm

  Now I know where you will find the program FRACTINT. It is the file
  /pub/ms-dos/fraktale/fractint.zip on the ftp server of Leipzig University.
  The adress is:  server2.rz.uni-leipzig.de or 139.18.1.2. You can login as
  usual with anonymous/e-mail_adress. But if you find another ftp site where
  fractint is available you should not use that in Leipzig, because the
  connections in the eastern part of Germany are very slow (the leaders of the
  former GDR were not interested in international communication).
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 12:54:39 LCL
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was LISTMAN@GRTHEUN1
From:         EACZ02YJ@GRTHEUN1.BITNET
Subject:      8087 question .. (correction )

       =========================================================================
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 11:10:33
From:         EACZ02YJ@GRTHEUN1
Subject:      8087 question...
sorry about the mistake in the other file i sent....
here is the original:
             ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  when using fractint 17.2 and type=mandel with these configurations
below:


1) float=no 8086 against 8087
2) float=yes 8086 against 8087
3) float=no 8086 against 80286
4) float=yes 8086 against 80826
5) float=no (8086)+8087 against 80286
6) float=yes (8086)+8087 aginst 80286
what exact differences in speed would i have ?
if anyone knows the difference in speed or just the calculating times please
tell me because i'm thinking of buying a 8087 or a 80286.

P.S. i'm interested in ALL above comparisons but especially NO:(5) ,(6), (2).
thanks on behalf,Gregory Tsakaleris,agriculture engineer in thessaloniki univ.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
eacz02yj@grtheun1.bitnet
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: frac-l@gitvm1.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"EACZ02YJ@GRTHEUN1.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: IN%"frac-l@gitvm1.bitnet",LUNDIN
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 10:15:00 EDT
From:         John Lundin Jr <LUNDIN@URVAX.BITNET>
Subject: old fractint (was: <none>)
X-To:         EACZ02YJ@GRTHEUN1.BITNET

In article <FRAC-L%92041007205445@GITVM1.BITNET> EACZ02YJ@GRTHEUN1.BITNET
  wrote:
>i'd like to know an ftp site where i can get an old version of fractint that
>can be run from a floppy disk of 360k... fractint v 17.2 is much too big...

FRAIN151.ZIP is still available for anonymous ftp from URVAX.URICH.EDU
[141.166.1.6], directory `[ANONYMOUS.JCL.FRACTAL]'.  For just that reason.
If you get it, please try to avoid our 9:30am-to-9:30pm (EDT) prime time.

Best of luck.                    -John Lundin

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
John Lundin   lundin@urvax.bitnet     "Immature programmers imitate
U Richmond    lundin@urvax.urich.edu     mature programmers steal"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 14:41:34 CDT
From:         C549597@UMCVMB.BITNET
Subject:      don't ask

Chill out Serfling, many don't know their way around as well as you do.  This
is a logical place to ask such questions.

G. Petroski
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 13:44:33 CDT
From:         "Roy Hallquist Jr." <rsh@ENGR.UARK.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Fractint for Sun
X-To:         FRAC-L%GITVM1.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU
              "C549597%UMCVMB.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU" at Apr 6, 92 5:14 pm

>
> I think I've seen this question discussed here, but don't recall the
> answer.   Is is there a version of Fractint that will run on SUN
> workstations?  If so, where can I ftp it?  Is it in source or executable
> form?
>
> Thanks, Greg Petroski
> c549597@umcvmb
>

Look at any of the mirrors for simtel-20 (such as
wuarchive.wustl.edu).  There is an X version in the same directory as
the DOS version of Fractint.  Look in /mirrors/msdos/graphics.

..Roy Hallquist, Jr.
  rsh@engr.uark.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.frac-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 13:07:11 LCL
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was LISTMAN@GRTHEUN1
From:         EACZ02YJ@GRTHEUN1.BITNET
Subject:      (No subject)

i'd like to know an ftp site where i can get an old  version of fractint
that can be run from a floppy disk of 360k.
fractint v 17.2 is much too big for a single floppy...
please send your mail to eacz02yj@grtheun1.bitnet
tsakaleris gregory ,agriculture engineerer
thessaloniki university,greece.

thanks on behalf.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU