HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 02:57:39 -0400 
From: Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: NFC Central
	<1992Sep28.042621.28301@zip.eecs.umich.edu>

> >Any other comments?
> Only that the Lions' only win against the Vikings wasn't really an
> adequate description of how both teams were playing.  Peete couldn't
> connect in that game either.  The Lions are lucky that they are not
> 4 games back of the Vikings.
>  
> 	The Bears will fade and so will Tampa Bay.  The Vikings and
> the Lions are the only teams that have the talent to win the division,
> but the Lions will have to get Barry running better to get some W's.

I agree.  The Bears seem to be getting old and they are losing size and
skill on both sides of the ball.  They still need a QB.
  And as a fan in the NFC Central, I *know* the Bucs can't keep winning
- precedent simply denies it.
  The Vikes, however, seem to have found themselves a QB.  I never
thought Gannon was as good as he was today, probably because I just
assumed defense was the reason they have always done well.  They have a
lot of talent, more than I ever thought, but I think that they will win
the division mainly because the division is all around .500.
  The Packers will continue to improve, especially with the confidence
they gained after solidly beating a 3-0 team today.
  The Lions, on the other hand, seem to be self-destructing.  They don't
have the emotional high from last year, and they seem to be really dying
against average teams.  Unless Barry can get back on track, and the
defense can get going, Peete's amazing stats will mean nothing and they
will keep losing.

In view of today's games, I predict:
1.  Vikings 10-6   (atop a division with not much competition)
2.  Lions 8-8      (they'll catch up, but not enough)
3.  Tampa Bay 7-9  (they'll fade)
3.  Bears  7-9     (they'll fade too)
3.  Packers 7-9    (ride that easy schedule out)

The division games will wind up being very important.  Look for Lions
games against Green Bay and Tampa Bay, the Vikings-Bears matchup, and
the infamous Battle of the Bays.  Those games will go a long way in
deciding how well everybody does.

Erik Witte
From: mccray@crchh496.BNR.CA (Dale McCray)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NINERS WIN!!
Date: 3 Oct 92 02:42:15 GMT
Reply-To: mccray@crchh496.BNR.CA (Dale McCray)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.

In article <1992Oct2.225544.10939@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM
(John P. Gloria) writes:
|>In article <1992Oct02.080224.10416@bnr.ca> mccray@crchh496.BNR.CA
(Dale McCray) writes:
|>>In article <1992Oct1.081620.12045@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM
|>>(John P. Gloria) writes:
|>>|>
|>>|>I'll bet you don't have the HUEVOS to call me a fairy-whiner to
|>>|>my face, whereas I have what it takes to refer to you as a PUTO or 
|>>                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^                            
|>>What it takes? Lemme take a wild guess. Is it being able to look at
|>>yourself in the mirror and say "I may be an insufferable, obnoxious
|>>jerk, but by golly, I like myself."  Isn't that special?
|>>
|>
|>NO, wrong penis breath! :-) If the truth be known, (hey you brought it up,)
|>when I look in the mirror, I usually say to myself, "Damn, I look good!" I
|>go to work and almost everyday a lady will confirm my observations. :-)
|>What do you observe in the mirror besides pimples?

Hey, no fair. I asked you a simple yes or no question(congratulations on
not being stumped). :-)  Just in case your bigoted flames were inadvertent,
ethnic epithets such as your gardening slur in the previous post are far
less effective than, say, the clever pimple reference above. This is because
many of us have come to equate prejudice with ignorance. So, even though I
have nothing against the 49ers, take this:

Ronnie Lott! Ronnie Lott! Ronnie Lott! Ronnie Lott! 8-)
 

|>-- 
|>  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
|>  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
|>   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
                    
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Re: Green Bay 17, Pitt 3
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 29 SEP 92 12:51:24    

In article <1992Sep28.154026.5509@seq.uncwil.edu>, rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes...

>heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
> 
>>Goofy NFL rule #341:  When a punt is muffed the team that recovers it 
>>gets the ball not where it's recovered but where the muff took place.  
>>I can understand the rule saying you can't advance a muff - although I 
>>don't see why this is not allowed at least its comprehensible.  But 
>>the team that recovers the ball should get it where they recover it.  
>>The rule must be in place to keep teams from trying to muff the ball 
>>forward.  This would seem extremely unlikely anyway.
> 
> *or* to keep the punting team from batting the backward towards the
>endzone. This is just as likely, if not more likely an occurance than
>the muffing team batting it forwards...

I suppose it's because on a punt the only player on the recieving team 
that would be in the vacinity would be the punt returner.  It could be 
11 against 1.  The kicking team could bat the ball around until it was 
in the endzone and then just fall on it.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Eric Sybesma)
Subject: Re: Comments, this weeks games
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 16:33:43 GMT

In article <wemXcRq00iUzE0tnVO@andrew.cmu.edu> Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>GREEN BAY AT ATLANTA
>Both teams need a win to have a chance in their division.  Altlanta is
>floundering, and has fallen to 1-3 and is behind the lowly Rams in the
>NFC West.  They really need to assert themselves.  If Atlanta is going
>to win, a few things must happen.  They have to stop Favre.  He will
>have a lot of confidence after last weeks game, and that will affect
>other players, too.  Favre likes to throw short passes.  Although McKyer
>and Sanders will make it tough on the WR's, the Falcons have a soft
>underside and will be vulnerable to lots of short plays.  If Green Bay
>wins, they will guarantee themselves a tie for second in Central.  My
>prediction, Green Bay bay 3.

I give the edge to the Falcons, because they are not going to let the
NFC Central kick 'em around two weeks in a row.  Falcons by 6

>NEW ORLEANS AT DETROIT
>Detroit may just manage to lose again.  A battered offense takes on an
>overpowering defense.  Detroit will get shut down in a big way.  Watch
>Barry Sanders run well despite no blocking and an absolutely miserable
>performance by the rest of the team.  My prediction:  Saints by 6.  Why

I think you may be forgetting that they are playing in the Silverdome.
The Lions have been in every game this year, and I will contend that
their worst-played game was against a then-confused Minnesota squad.
Barry will run for 130 yards and two touchdowns (law of averages) and
the Lions win a close one at home by 3.

>Get psyched for a week of great games.  There are 4 undefeated teams
>now, next week there will be only 2.  Who will they be?

Well, don't count on it. This isn't the playoffs.  Ties still exist.
(But you are probably right.. :-)

>As usual, any comments or questions?  I didn't type all this in for
>nobody to respond!
>
I'll go with all of your other winners and i like your spreads...
eric
>
>ENTER MY POOL! (see the post NEW NFL POOL-OPEN TO ALL from 29-Sep-92)
>


-- 
Eric Sybesma
University of Michigan
sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu
sybesma@maize.engin.umich.edu
From: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM (Bennet Ih - Sun BOS Hardware - Sunergy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Philly on MNF (was: Re: Dallas and Philadelphia)
Date: 30 Sep 92 13:56:21 GMT
Reply-To: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. - BDC
NNTP-Posting-Host: mowgli.east.sun.com

> jawiles@eos.ncsu.edu (JERRY ALLEN WILES)

> Philly is .500 in monday night games (3 years, I believe) and winless against 
> teams with winning records on monday night.  I hate Dallas, but I thing that
> lady Monday is against them! Sorry.

Really? Wasn't the Eagles-NY Giants game where Randall rolled right, 
got his feet taken out by a Giants LB (Carl Banks?), managed to land
without touching his knees and threw a TD to one of his TEs (not Keith
Jackson, BTW) on Monday night? I thought the Eagles won that game
and the Giants had a winning record.

-Bennet
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Finally...Jackson's outta here!!!
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:17:38 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Sep29.213440.7296@cerritos.edu>, jacobs@cerritos.edu writes:
> In article <1a8fqqINNarh@shirley.cs.widener.edu>, austin@cs.widener.edu (Jeff Austin) writes:
>
>          [ 'see ya keith' deleted ]
> 
> That's what allthe Rams fans said after they got rid of Dickerson, and look
> what happened to them!!
> 
> Karl
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________________Karl Jacobs - Jacobs@cerritos.edu
> 

          The Rams didn't and don't have Cunningham.  They also didn't have
Hershal Walker (sp?) (and the Eagles didn't have to give away half their team
for him either).  I don't think Keith leaving Philladelphia will hurt the
team that much.

-- no sig necessary --
       Aza
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Kevin Lu)
Subject: Re: Man In Motion/Shifting Players
Organization: Monash University General Access Unix
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 06:12:38 GMT

Dustin Emhart (vaps0de@prism.gatech.EDU) wrote:
> In <1992Oct1.045213.10012@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Kevin Lu) writes:
> 
> 
> >Hi there,
> >	The NFL rules state that the offense is granted ONE man in motion,
> >correct?. If so, how do the officials determine if a player is in motion,
> >or is just shifting?
> 
> A shift is when one or more players move to a new position and come set for at 
> least one full second before the ball is snapped. After all players are set,
> one player is allowed to go in motion, and not be moving forward when the ball
> is snapped.
> -- 
> Dustin Emhart                       |  CS Majors: We do more after 11 pm than
> Georgia Institute of Technology     |  most people do all day.
> Internet: vaps0de@prism.gatech.edu  |        -- me

Thanks for that, but i've seen quite a lot of Redskin matches and i could
have sworn that on some plays, a flag should have been thrown for 2 men in
motion. Is a player only allowed to shift once? i.e if a TE lines up on
the left side, shifts to the right side, then any lateral movement by the
TE would be motion?

Also, does the way in which the player moves make a difference (i.e side
stepping for a shift). I ask this question, as i remember the Oilers
getting flagged for two men in motion in last seasons AFC Playoffs, and
what they were doing ('players in motion') was similiar to what the 'Skins do.

  +----------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
  |  Kevin Lu                              | Monash University             |
  |  Email: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au  | Clayton, Victoria             |
  |                                        | Australia                     |
From: jms@vision.sarnoff.com (Jerry Shapiro x2420)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ed Marinaro question
Date: 3 Oct 92 13:54:20 GMT
Reply-To: jms@vision.sarnoff.com
Organization: David Sarnoff Research Center

In article 2262@vixvax.mgi.com, eiswirth@vixvax.mgi.com (Steve Eiswirth) writes:
>Where did Ed Marinaro play his college ball?


Cornell
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!)
Subject: Re: Intentional Grounding
Organization: Yale University Computing & Information Systems
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 18:48:01 GMT

In article <1992Oct05.012756.21823@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
>Subject: Re: Intentional Grounding
>Date: Mon, 05 Oct 92 01:27:56 GMT

>In article <4OCT92.20452420@vax.clarku.edu> htilney@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>>Has this rule been altered lately?
>>
>>I saw it called against Marino and Kelly today, when neither seemed
>>to be under pressure. Both were throwing into the end zone.

> The rules  haven't changed, the  umpire was just being very nasty (though
>consistent) with his calling of it.  The rule states something to the effect
>that if in the umpires judgement, the QB threw the ball away intentionally

You said it right here  ^^^^^^^^^.  Judgement is the key word.  
I am sure all the officials are being very careful this year, with no IR, 
they should be.  Someone stated earlier that it was fair enough because they 
called it on both QB's.  GOOD!  Now thats unbiased officionating.
Adriene L. Nazaretian        
Yale University              
ADRIENE@YALEADS.BITNET        
ADRIENE@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jason@cray.com (Jason Parker)
Subject: Minnesota Vikings wk5
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 5 Oct 92 13:58:19 CDT

Corrections... Delete previous...

TEAM
Minnesota Vikings (4-1 1st NFC Central)

NEXT OPPONENT
(idle week 6)
Detroit Lions (Thurs 10/15 at Minnesota)

GAME SUMMARY

          Minnesota*  Chicago
Pts       21          20
Rushing   27-127      28-86
Pass Att  21-26-2     20-34-2
Pass Yds  205         189
Fum Lost  2           1
Poss      26:51       33:09

PASSING
Gannon     25-20-2 187 P
Jones       1-1-0 18

RUSHING
T. Allen  11-72
Gannon     7-26
Craig      7-17 T
A. Carter  2-12

RECEIVING
C. Carter 8-67 T
Allen     5-69
Craig     3-40
A. Carter 2-15
Jones     2-10
Whitaker  1-4

KICKING
Reveiz 3X

SACKS
Doleman 1

INTERCEPTIONS
Scott     1
McMillian 1

INJURIES
Steve Jordan (sprained knee & ankle)

GAME SUMMARY
Vikings overcame first half turnovers and penalties
sparked by 4th quarter TD interception by Todd Scott.
Gannon was 8 of 8 for 118 yards and one touchdown in
the fourth quarter.  Neal Anderson & Brad Muster were
limited to 62 yards on 24 rushes.

NEWS ITEMS
Anthony Carter became the eighth player in NFL history
to catch passes in 100 straight games.  Jerry Rice
also has caught passes in 100 straight games.
Rich Gannon's 37th touchdown pass ties him for 4th
place with Joe Kapp for Viking touchdowns thrown.
The Vikings had defeated the Eagles after trailing
23-0 in the fourth quarter, 28-23 on 12/1/1985.

Source: Minneapolis Star Tribune 10/5/92

OTHER NOTES 
*= Home team
P= Touchdown Pass Thrown
T= Touchdowns Scored
F= Field Goal Scored (number in parens is distance)
X= Extra Point Scored
PASSING: completions,attempts,interceptions, TD passes

This posting follows the proposed format of the NFL TEAM STAT PROJECT
Contact Jason Parker - jason@cray.com to sign-up and enter your
favorite team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: isupstud@bnr.ca (Wayne Hutton)
Subject: Re: Crowd Noise Rule
Reply-To: isupstud@bnr.ca (Wayne Hutton)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:39:12 GMT


	I totally agree with your opinion on the "Crowd Noise Rule".  One of the biggest advantages of having home field advantage is that the crowd is on your side.  Besides that, part of the fun of going to a game is being able to cheer for your team while making a complete fool of yourself.  I even became a fan of the Browns because (besides the fact that I like the team itself) the "Dawg Pound" is part of their strategy.  I think you should write to the NFL and make your complaint.  If you need a petition, we





ll at least you'll have two names signed on it.

Signed, a true football fan.
-t.
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Wednesday, 30 Sep 1992 17:57:44 EDT
From: Nathan Owen <32BFPQ3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Packer Update

In article <1992Sep30.172038.21764@cis.ohio-state.edu>,
martens@laurel.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens) says:
>
>Clarinews reports that Green Bay has placed James Campen on IR
>with sprained knee ligaments, and signed former Packer and 49er
>C-G Tom Neville to take his spot on the roster.
>

That really hurts.   Green Bay has  already given up 20 sacks in the first
four games alone.  Now the second best lineman on the team is out.  We could
see around 80 sacks for the year if things don't get any better.

>Also, I just noticed:  Vince Workman is running at 1000 yard pace.
>It's been awhile since someone other than Barry Sanders and Neal
>Anderson got 1000 yards in Green Bay, so this is nice to see.
>

I really like Workman this year.  He is a really good all purpose back
who was always a good reiciever and now has become an decent runner.  Even
though he is on pace to get a thousand yards I don't think he will simply
because Thompson will see the ball a little bit.


>--
>
From: ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Will "Prime Time" be playing this Sunday?
Date: 3 Oct 92 23:43:26 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Oct1.142004.229334@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> hm00@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (HOWARD JAY MILLER) writes:
>Is the Neon one going to play this Sunday against the Packers?  I know that
>the baseball playoffs are starting on Tuesday in Atlanta, would the Braves
>insists that Deion is well rested for it?

Why? Baseball is not all that strenuous and Nixon is playing quite well so 
Neon could sit and wait for an opportunity to contribute. Again not a very 
strenuous proposition. 


-- 
Ronnie
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not cynical... I just don't believe in anything....
From: v069qqqc@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike C.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: MAD DOLFAN (was Re: EAGLES WILL GO 16-0 IF ANYONE DOES)
Date: 1 Oct 92 03:13:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <BvF8E8.9LK@acsu.buffalo.edu>, evans@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Doug Evans - CIT Network Operations) writes...
> 
>You know - I was just starting to miss the MAD DOLFAN, when this guy came
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^
>along.  Now r.s.f.p is complete. We have our token idiot to amuse ourselves
>with.  Isn't the net a wonderful thing?
> 

That's it! I knew something was missing in this year's pre-Bills-Dolphins
hype week! I miss the DOLFAN's rantings in ALL-CAPS...

I suspect someone taught him how to use an editor and now he's
masquerading as a 'normal' Fins fan (if such a thing exists :-)).

Mike
:-)
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Need answers to some questions
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:21:16 GMT
Organization: Chevron

Mike Reese writes:
>
>1)  Which Super Bowl winner was awarded the first Vince Lombardi
>Trophy?

My guess would be the Chiefs (SB IV) or the Colts (SB V).

>3)  How many Super Bowl MVPs played for the losing team?

Chuck Howley, Cowboys, SB V loss to the Colts 16-13.  He had 2 int's, I
think.  He was the only one, unless someone for the Bills won it for SB XXV?


-- 
**************************************************************************
GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!	| Andy: "Howdy boys........."
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!    | Andy: "...Yer boys are mighty talkative today."
James Clyde  LSU '91    | Briscoe: "Yeh,...they's all keyed up."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: 49ers vs. who?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 01:19:21 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.213819.19563@beaver.cs.washington.edu> rex@cs.washington.edu (Rex Jakobovits) writes:

>can someone supply me with this info:
>	who are the 49ers playing sunday?

-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: joel@cs.utexas.edu (Joel Daniel Just)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Steve B. (was Re: Raiders QBs)
Date: 2 Oct 1992 13:09:48 -0500
Organization: U Texas Dept of Computer Sciences, Austin TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: langtry.cs.utexas.edu


In article <1ahvt4INNk8d@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K) writes:
>In article <1992Sep30.002046.19584@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> ded@aplcen (nod sivad) writes:
[stuff deleted]

>Close, but actually it was "We want Beuerlein back."
>
>
>Ray      GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!

Congratulations, Ray!  You have spelled Steve Beuerlein's name correctly!
I haven't been reading every single article, but I believe that this is the
first time I have seen his name spelled correctly on this newsgroup.

Again, congratulations!  Happy spelling!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bowen@ug.cs.dal.ca (keith graham bowen)
Subject: Re: K.C. vs. Philly
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 01:45:56 GMT



Kansas City Chiefs
------------------

QB - Dave Krieg:  Streaky passer with fumble trouble, but can make big plays

RB's - Oh my.... Christian Okoye and Barry Word are incredible power blasters,
       while harvey Williams and Todd McNair have the speed and pass-catching 
       ability. IMHO the best backfield in the AFC

WR's - This area  was a sore spot for many years, but the Chiefs are fine now,
       with J.J.Birden and Davis as recievers.

OL - This line is HUGE. Alt,Szott,Grunhard,Baldinger,and Lutz open huge holes
     for the backs ( as if they need them....)

DL - Maas,Salumea,and Neil Smith are a fine group of run-stoppers with some
     pass-rush ability.

LB - One of the strongest facets of the chiefs game is the LB corps. Snow,
     Thomas,Hackett, and Martin are all good players, and Thomas is a pass-
     rushing demon.

SECONDARY - With pro bowlers Kevin Ross and Albert Lewis at the corners, and 
	    with solid safties, the chiefs are by no means weak in coverage.

SPECIAL TEAMS - Kevin Lowery is a great kicker, and Schottenheimer(sp?)
		coached teams always seem to block kicks and cover returns
		well. The only thing im unsure of is the ability of the kick 
		returners.


From the above it would seem as if the Chiefs have no weaknesses, however they
lack a truly explosive offence, so comebacks from large defecits are unlikely.
Also, the offense is predictable and relys on the big backs to run effectively
enough to set up the pass. If Okoye and Word are shut down, it could be a long day for the Chiefs........


-Keith
GOOOOOOOO BRONCOS!!!!!!
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Predict/track NFL scores
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:07:55 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241


If any of you are interested in a football-pool-type program that runs on a
PC under MS Windows, I suggest trying a program at wuarchive.wustl.edu
called NFL_1992 Scoreboard.  It's in the directory /mirrors/win3/uploads
under the filename nfl92.zip.  It was written by a man named Thomas Kerr,
and he's marketing it as shareware.  I'm trying it out.

For practice, I entered the first 4 weeks of NFL scores (also at wuarchive,
thanks Gidi).  I then produced a couple of reports, which I'll post in
subsequent messages.  The program apparently uses 1991 results (playoffs
included) and 1992 game data to predict scores and assign "power" ratings.
You be the judge.
--
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_