From: omhoward@acsu.buffalo.edu (The God-Bitch Emperor of Snuggle Bunnies)
Newsgroups: rec.scouting,alt.discrimination,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: BofA and UW can now support discrimination against blacks and Jews
Date: 11 Sep 92 06:42:02 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: UB

In <10SEP199218541305@rosie.uh.edu> st1lv@rosie.uh.edu (McLeod, Stephen) writes:

>Jeez-- forget it.  You're right.  All homosexuals are saints and would *never*
>ever be attracted to a sexually mature teenager like a straight person would.
>You guys and ladies are perfect and infallible unlike straight people.  To you

No. what is being said though is that we are no more attracted to
youngsters than you are.  *xcuse any mistakes this is my 4th beer)..

>And there were never any societies where homosexuality was more common than
>10% of the population.

Whadda you consider gay?  I know many a straight boy that has gone a
slummin..  that doesn't make them gay.. Just curious...  **Sheesh**

>Only straights and pedophiles have sex with kids under 18-- never homosexuals.

No but a lot *more* heterosexuals are..  even when you take the fact
that we're only 10% of the population...

>All of our sexual kinks are determined in the womb.  There's even a gene for
>attraction to leather.  Environment has zero effect.

Mostly I think so... Whether or not you choose to sleep with someone
is your business but, who you're attracted too.. thats all different..

>There is no need to install the same kinds of protection for lesbians with 
>girls as their is for men with young girls because they are never, ever, in
>a million years attracted to the girls, unlike men because their sexual drives
>are somehow purer.  Ditto for homosexual males with young males.

No, but speaking from expirence as a baby sitter (I'm only 19), I'm a
fuck of a lot more careful around younger children because I know I
have to be.  When you are aware you make less mistakes.  Same goes for
sleeping with younger people.. if there more than 2 years younger no,
for reasons you have made clear.. and if they are younger I make it a
point not to initate anything...

>And so on.  
and so on

>Listen, either you *are* "normal" except your orientation is towards the same
>sex or you are not.  You seem to be one of those people who are striving so
>hard to advance your point that you are unwiling to conceed any negative point
>however slight.  In this regard, you are 'normal' too I guess but it gets real
>tiring when I find I'm talking to a *PERSON* like you be they religious, gay, 
>or whatever affiliation.

Normal is fine I'm not saying all gays are prefect but, I have to
admit when I'm aware that a consession about 1 person means
condemnation for us all.. well it's real hard to concede that one
person..

>Communication with you is a one way street so I'm getting off.
bye.

again sorry I'm plastered...  You can thank my best friend the
heterosexual eagle scout for this.. :)

*thanks bill*

Have A Day
-Eftsne (Olu)
*Vox Domini*

******** _______________________________ All expressed opinions are mine unless
 * bi * |   omhoward@acsu.buffalo.edu   | otherwise noted..  (UB wouldn't have
  ****  | V117MG7B@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu |  any opinions (besides popular ones)
   **    -------------------------------    anyway..)
Smurf these codes:
         *S8/3 b g+(+) l+(-) y/ z(-) n+ o+(+) x(+) a+ u(+) v(+) j+(+)*
                     *B0 f w cd g++! k(+) s- h- r p*
Good quote follows:
   "I believe that homophobia is equivalent to racism.  Prejudicial violence
     towards gays and lesbians is as irrational as hostility towards African
     Americans.  A bigot is a bigot."     		-L.S. Welch 
Newsgroups: rec.scouting,alt.discrimination,chi.general,alt.atheism,alt.politics.homosexuality