HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ag@cogsci.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Gabryelski)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Keybindings in ksh
Date: 8 Nov 1992 18:05:12 GMT
Organization: Institute of Cognitive Studies, U.C. Berkeley
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: cogsci.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Nov8.130814.10044@cs.albany.edu> barnett@cs.albany.edu (Janet A Barnett) writes:
>Does ksh allow rebinding of editing functions?

No, although some public domain shells do offer this feature.  Check
out bash and tcsh.

Pax, Keith
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: barnett@cs.albany.edu (Janet A Barnett)
Subject: X11R5
Summary: How's it doing
Originator: barnett@watson.albany.edu
Organization: The University at Albany, Comp. Sci. Dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 13:02:07 GMT

At one time there was a file in amiga.physik describing the author's
experience in getting X11R5 to run on the amiga. I can't seem to
locate this file now that I would like to look at it again. Is someone
who's worked on it willing to post it here again?

A couple  of months ago, Rick Schaeffer told me that he and Keith
Gabryelski were working on color R5. Would either of them care to
comment on the state of their work?

Allen Barnett
(whose wife graciously allowed to use her account)
From: skrenta@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rich Skrenta)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Fixes for /dev/term/ql?? and /dev/term/ser garbage.
Date: 10 Nov 92 04:21:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Nov10.042118.13353
Distribution: usa
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

ag@cogsci.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Gabryelski) writes:
> Thanks to Mike Ditto for bringing the bug to my attention.
> 
> Thanks to Rich Skrenta for testing the fixed drivers.

I've been bringing that bug to your attention for two years,
you just didn't believe me!  :-)

Finally, perfect serial ports...

--
Rich Skrenta
From: seanr@lobo.rmhs.colorado.edu (Sean Reifschneider)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Keybindings in ksh
Date: 9 Nov 92 17:12:39 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Rocky Mountain High School, Fort Collins, CO

In article <1992Nov8.130814.10044@cs.albany.edu> barnett@cs.albany.edu (Janet A Barnett) writes:
>Does ksh allow rebinding of editing functions? For instance, in emacs
>mode I'd like up-arrow to recall the previous command line instead of
>(or in addition to?) ^P.

On a side note (while this is being discussed), is there a way I can tell
ksh to do file name completion using Esc-Esc instead of Esc-\?  I've seen
other shells that use Esc-Esc (other versions of ksh, that is), but it
doesn't work on AMIX.  I'm presuming it's a config thing...

Thanks,
Sean
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Markus Wild)
Subject: Re: X11R5
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:17:37 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.004224.26099@crd.ge.com> barnettj@pookie.crd.ge.com (Janet A Barnett) writes:
>Has anyone gotten X11R5 to run on a resolver board? Keith Gabryelski's
>port on the 2.1 installation tape seems to work, with only a few

I've looked at the source today, and was not exactly happy to see that
all the nice conditionals on DMI/LOWELL had gone, in favor of the DMI
board (since I have a 2410, I don't think this was a wise choice :-/).

So, somebody else had the same problem? Already reintegrated the changes?

-Markus
-- 
Markus M. Wild    -  wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch  |  wild@amiga.physik.unizh.ch 
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving
from where you left them to where you can't find them.
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: X11R5
Date: 12 Nov 1992 14:58:45 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <1992Nov12.004224.26099@crd.ge.com> barnettj@pookie.crd.ge.com (Janet A Barnett) writes:
=Has anyone gotten X11R5 to run on a resolver board? Keith Gabryelski's
=port on the 2.1 installation tape seems to work, with only a few
=weirdnesses. Such as:

	If you can do it you might try:

	1) Fetching the base MIT X11R5 distribution+ 17 patches, apply
	   the first 12(?).
	2) Fetch the monochrome server patches I put on amiga.physik.unizh.ch
	   a while back and apply them.
	3) Apply the rest of the MIT patches.
	4) Make the monochrome server and make sure it works correctly.
	5) Reinitegrate Keith's X11R5 color server into this code.

	The reason I suggest this is that the code on the tape has mixed
	patchlevels all over the place and this might be causing problems,
	i.e. it caused me quite a bit of grief with xterm and some other
	stuff. Also, the X11R5 patch level 17 code has quite a bit of
	generic server changes since the path level (6?) - (9?) code
	that is on the tape. Some of the changes between pl6 and pl17
	might help with your server and library problems.

	By the way, all SVR4 X11R5 server's I've seen whine about the
	operation not being suypported, it is a side effect of the
	socket emulation code on X11R5 and not AmigaUNIX's fault.

	Good luck!

		-Rob
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Remote shell problems. HELP!!!!
From: etac@levels.unisa.edu.au (Andrew Chalmers)
Date: 6 Nov 92 13:18:50 +1030
Organization: University of South Australia

I've been running 2.03 for sometime slowly solving my problems as they
occur (if I can).  I've now run accross a problem with rsh that I can't
seem to solve.  It has also highlited a problem with the shells that I
also have been unable to solve.

what I trying to do is use rsh to open a login session on another
station and have an xterm (or anything else) open up on my Amiga.
This works Ok.  However each rsh I use generates two processes, one of
which is always <defunct>.  The other process get a very low priority and
remains runnable, even when there is no i/o activity for the rsh.
Conequently every rsh usesup CPU time doing apparently nothing until I
close the login session.

Interestingly enough the rsh shells I normally ativate from the standard
shell (sh).  If I use csh or tcsh to start the rsh from I still get the
two processes as before but the rsh processes use little or no CPU time.
(the process status is indicated by a 'T' rather than 'R'

So I thought to resolve the situation I'd change some of my scripts to
use csh or tcsh instead.   This I could do.  The easiest way to switch
, I thought ,  was to use the convention of  #!/bin/sh or #!/bin/csh
to indicate the shell that should be used.   However I can't seem
to get this to work.

I have a sh script 'test' with #!/bin/sh on the first line. It has execute
privelege set.  I type 'test' at the prompt of csh or tcsh it SHOULD start
up a sh shell and run the script.  However all I actually get is the
prompt back. It doesn't even execute it as a csh script.  It just does
nothing. If I use 'csh test' or 'source test' it just run the script
as if it were an csh script.

Question: Does anyone know what is going on?
          Is it a problem I'm able to fix?

DON"T anyone tell me to get 2.1 !!!!  I would it I could !!!!
   It's still not available here !!!

Thanks

Andrew Chalmers.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: abeech@kraken.itc.gu.edu.au (Adrian Beech)
Subject: Contents of AmigaUNIX 2.1 tape?
Organization: ITC, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
Date: 10 Nov 92 04:02:04 GMT

Has anyone got a "contents" listing of the 2.1 AmigaUNIX tape?  I remember 
someone posting one for version 2.03 earlier this year.


-- 
Adrian V. Beech                         E-MAIL: A.Beech@ext.gu.edu.au
						adrianb@spectrum.adsp.sub.org
From: sum@aslan.uk.sun.com (Sum Mah - Sun UK - Bristol Systems Engineer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Interworks Enlan-DFS software
Date: 13 Nov 92 18:52:51 GMT
Reply-To: sum@aslan.uk.sun.com
Organization: Sun Microsystems

In article 1dug2gINNkae@ub.d.umn.edu, rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.185154.10044@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> bscott@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ben Scott) writes:
>=In a moment of fuzzy thinking I told a client that if he bought two Ethernet
>=cards and two sets of the AS-225 software he could hook up his 2000/040 to
>=his 4000 and not have to find some way to hook his 1 gig drive to both.  Of
>=course, this is wrong, but the stuff is on the way now...
>=
>	If you are a developer I think you might be able to schmooz
>	the newer networking code from C= that DOES have NFS
>	server capability although I hear it has a few, shall we
>	say, "quirks". Alternately, I think one of the Amiga X
>	packages includes a newer networking package that might
>	work as well.
>
>	You weren't wrong, just a little ahead of what C= is willing
>	to release to the public. Too bad 3.0 doesn't include some
>	sort of peer to peer networking in it. B^(.
>
>		-Rob


According to my ONC/NFS Technology Guide Spring 1991, it lists

	Commodore Business Machine

 Amiga TCP/IP provides ONC/NFS for the AmigaDOS. The following ONC
 services are offered:
	NFS.

Contact
 Commodore Business Machines
 West Chester, PA
 (215) 431 9100
 Ron Stanczak

Ship Date: Jan. 1991
Price: $199
OS: AmigaDOS

For the Amiga workd, is $199 a high price to pay compared to Interworks
Enlan-DFS? As ONC/NFS for AmigaDOS is listed in my NOC/NFS Technology
guide, I assume the product has FCS. Am I correct?


---

hth,
 Sum.

ps: Practise safe posting.  Wear a smiley  :-)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: logan@gimlet.herndon.va.us (Jim Logan)
Subject: Re: Fixes for /dev/term/ql?? and /dev/term/ser garbage.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 15:17:14 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: (None)

In article <1djldqINNhhf@agate.berkeley.edu> ag@cogsci.Berkeley.EDU
(Keith Gabryelski) writes:
# Included in the shell archive below is a new version of `ql.c'
# and `sl.c' which had some bugs in them that would cause garbage
# to be sent to user land under some circumstances.

Hooray!  Thanks, Keith!  I thought I was going to have to go in
and fix it myself since nobody else seems to have the same
problem.  What was the problem?  

-- 
Jim Logan
logan@gimlet.herndon.va.us     ...There's no place like $HOME.
uunet!gimlet!logan
From: robbar@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu (N Baruch robert alla (410)684-6204)
Subject: Tiga Source in /usr/sys/amgia/driver
Organization: Johns Hopkins Continuing Professional Programs
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 01:20:10 GMT


Can someone running Amix 2.1 give me the size and timestamps
of the /usr/sys/amiga/driver tiga.c and tiga.h files.

I've damaged mine, and would appreciate it if someone would
mail me these two files.


Robert

Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: barnett@cs.albany.edu (Janet A Barnett)
Subject: Keybindings in ksh
Originator: barnett@watson.albany.edu
Organization: The University at Albany, Comp. Sci. Dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 13:08:14 GMT

Does ksh allow rebinding of editing functions? For instance, in emacs
mode I'd like up-arrow to recall the previous command line instead of
(or in addition to?) ^P.

Allen Barnett
(whose wife graciously allowed to use her account)
From: ag@cogsci.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Gabryelski)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: biff problems.
Date: 7 Nov 1992 17:05:41 GMT
Organization: Institute of Cognitive Studies, U.C. Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: cogsci.berkeley.edu

In article <19102.2af0187e@levels.unisa.edu.au> etac@levels.unisa.edu.au (Andrew Chalmers) writes:
>Can someone tell me why biff and xbiff don't seem to work properly.
>biff never tells me when I have new mail at all.
>and xbiff won't generate a beep.

The current amiga unix X server does not have the ability to ring a
bell when requested.  This should be fixed soon.

Pax, Keith
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: crash@ckctpa.UUCP (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Subject: Re: Keybindings in ksh
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:34:12 GMT
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: crash%ckctpa@tct.com (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Organization: Edwards & Edwards Consulting

seanr@lobo.rmhs.colorado.edu (Sean Reifschneider) writes:
>On a side note (while this is being discussed), is there a way I can tell
>ksh to do file name completion using Esc-Esc instead of Esc-\?  I've seen
>other shells that use Esc-Esc (other versions of ksh, that is), but it
>doesn't work on AMIX.  I'm presuming it's a config thing...

No, no configure option for that one.  But if you're good with a
binary editor I would imagine that it'd be either a one- or two-byte
patch.  (Two bytes 'cuz it might be a nested switch structure.)

>Thanks,
>Sean

You're welcome.  But I didn't help, I'm afraid.
-- 
Frank "Crash" Edwards            Perceptual Technologies, Inc.
    It is necessary for the welfare of society that genius should be
    privileged to utter sedition, to blaspheme, to outrage good taste, to
    corrupt the youthful mind, and generally to scandalize one's uncles.
	    -- George Bernard Shaw
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: crash@ckctpa.UUCP (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Subject: Re: UNIX & Video Cards
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 04:53:10 GMT
Reply-To: crash%ckctpa@tct.com (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Organization: Edwards & Edwards Consulting

david@dflores.eagle.mission.tx.us (David Sergio Flores) writes:
>1a) Are there any 24 bit video cards that work under unix?  

Yes.  Both C='s A2410 and the DMI Resolver.  Note that both use an
8-bit color map with a 24-bit palette.  This means 256 colors out of a
palette of 16 million.

I don't know of any cards with full 24-bit support, although the
Vivid24 (also from DMI) might fit the bill -- I don't wanna say for
sure, 'cuz I'm not positive.

>1b) Are ther any 24 bit cards under $2000 (US) that have drivers for unix X windows?

Yes.  Same as above.

>2) Does unix, X windows, take advantage of the type & speed of the graphics processor the video card has?

No, not really.  Generally X Windows is not structured correctly.
This is being addressed by the MIT group doing the development, and
_may_ appear in Release 6, but I wouldn't count on it.  This
requirement means that modularity of low-level graphics handling needs
to be better coordinated with higher-level operations.

>3) Does the Firecracker card work?

(This may be a bit ignorant, but that never stopped me before!)

Firecracker is a frame buffer, correct?  If so, where's the graphics
processor?  (Hint: it doesn't have one)

>4) Does IV or Opal vision work?
>         [ ]YES             [ ]NO

Not familiar with these either.

>This should be quick and painless to answer, and would make many people very happy.  Thanks for your time.......

We'll see if it'll make you happy or not.  ;-)

PS: use the <RETURN> key, or set you editor to automagically break
lines.

>David Sergio Flores
>david@dflores.eagle.mission.tx.us
>dsf87f8a@panam2.panam.edu

Hopes this help.
-- 
Frank "Crash" Edwards            Perceptual Technologies, Inc.
Fax:  813/786-6526               [Our office is moving; watch this space
Home: 813/786-3675               for the new phone number.]
    "The beast of Tenagra.  Rozauni; his army.  Chaka; when the walls fell."
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Markus Wild)
Subject: Re: Fixes for /dev/term/ql?? and /dev/term/ser garbage.
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 01:02:18 GMT


Looks like an interesting fix, but some things don't seem to work
like they should.. Could be a difference between 2.03 sl.h and 2.1 sl.h?
I compiled it on 2.03, and after 2 or 3 keystrokes on /dev/term/ser (with
echo from the modem) the system hung, everything blocked...

So... is sl.c supposed to work, or did perhaps slip some nasty bug into
the process of adapting changes from ql.c to sl.c? Wild guesses;-)

Sidenote: I found it interesting to get an article with "Distribution: usa"
here in Europe, but the main question is: why *was* the article posted
that way? It didn't contain any DES-sources so .. ;-)

-Markus
-- 
Markus M. Wild    -  wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch  |  wild@amiga.physik.unizh.ch 
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving
from where you left them to where you can't find them.
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: biff problems.
Date: 7 Nov 1992 13:08:21 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <1dgt15INN8ft@agate.berkeley.edu> ag@cogsci.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Gabryelski) writes:
=The current amiga unix X server does not have the ability to ring a
=bell when requested.  This should be fixed soon.
=
	I added a beep to the mono X11R5 patches I put on amiga.physik
	way back when. Basically I just printed a bell character to
	the server's stdout, or was it stderr, anyways with the patches
	on amiga.physik added to the X11R5 code from MIT, with appropriate
	MIT patches as stated in the cpio archive, the monochrome server
	should beep. The color server is probably a different solution.

		-Rob
From: barnettj@pookie.crd.ge.com (Janet A Barnett)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: X11R5
Date: 12 Nov 92 00:42:24 GMT
Organization: GE Corp. Research & Development, Schenectady, NY


Apology: I think my last question about this got lost or the mail
server went on holiday.

Has anyone gotten X11R5 to run on a resolver board? Keith Gabryelski's
port on the 2.1 installation tape seems to work, with only a few
weirdnesses. Such as:
o xsetroot doesn't seem to (set the root that is)
o xfontsel doesn't refresh correctly if the font can't be loaded on to
  the graphics board
o fs gives the message : SO_DONTLINGER not supported, and the fs
  utilities claim they cannot find the server
o mwm (from DMI) doesn't always render text properly in menus
o starting X manually then sourcing my .xsession file causes the
  server to exit after the first X client (xrdb) finishes. X gives an
  error of "no screens found". If the first client continues to run,
  things work OK

If anyone has any general information or specific solutions, I would
like to hear about them.

Again, sorry for the repetition.

Allen Barnett
Whose wife graciously allowed to use her account
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: bru, mail and groupid's
Date: 9 Nov 1992 15:48:27 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <1992Nov9.191218.28146@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jea@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu (Joanne Albano) writes:
=1) a bru that run's under AMIGADOS 1.3 and gets along with unix bru?
=
	Think you have to move up to 2.04 or higher. This is probably
	a good idea because C= will probably have little sympathy for
	1.3 users now that 2.04, 2.1 and 3.0 are out...

=2) What I might need to do to properly send mail from the AMGAUNIX
=machine besides set up the hosts file with a current list of machine
=id's and gateways?
=
	It might be easier to use DNS a.k.a. BIND a.k.a "resolver"
	depending on how your campus network is set up. Ask the
	system admin what the nameserver address is then follow
	the info in the AmigaUNIX 2.1 release notes on setting up
	the domain nameserver.

=3) How do I change the group id's on the AMIGA UniX machine so that they
=are compatible with our group id's in our local area network?
=
	Edit /etc/group and /etc/passwd so that group and use ID's
	match.

		-Rob
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Autobauding on /dev/term/ser
Date: 12 Nov 1992 15:01:12 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <BxL62J.BnF@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu> robbar@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu (N Baruch robert alla) writes:
=I just recently got a new modem, and now I'm interested in
=setting up my /dev/term/ser line to autobaud to support the variety
=of dialups.
=
	FYI: I believe the built in autobaud is limited to 9600 and slower. B^(.

		-Rob
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: ler@lerami.lerctr.org (Larry Rosenman)
Subject: Re: Fixes for /dev/term/ql?? and /dev/term/ser garbage.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 02:03:32 GMT
Organization: Larry Rosenman's personal SVR4 Box

In article <1992Nov9.010218.12105@bernina.ethz.ch> wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Markus Wild) writes:
>
>Looks like an interesting fix, but some things don't seem to work
>like they should.. Could be a difference between 2.03 sl.h and 2.1 sl.h?
>I compiled it on 2.03, and after 2 or 3 keystrokes on /dev/term/ser (with
>echo from the modem) the system hung, everything blocked...
Same on 2.1p2a.
>
>So... is sl.c supposed to work, or did perhaps slip some nasty bug into
>the process of adapting changes from ql.c to sl.c? Wild guesses;-)
seems so, QL seems(!) to work (for the short time I tested/played with it, I need 
the sl to work.).
>
>Sidenote: I found it interesting to get an article with "Distribution: usa"
>here in Europe, but the main question is: why *was* the article posted
>that way? It didn't contain any DES-sources so .. ;-)
?????? good question .............
>
>-Markus
>-- 
>Markus M. Wild    -  wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch  |  wild@amiga.physik.unizh.ch 
>Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving
>from where you left them to where you can't find them.


-- 
Larry Rosenman                            Internet: ler@lerami.lerctr.org
ATT: +1 214-399-0210 (voice)  BIX: ler    UUCP: ..!utacfd.uta.edu!lerami!ler
US Mail: 900 Lake Isle Circle, Irving, TX 75060-7726
From: keven@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (Keven Ring)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Help!!
Date: 12 Nov 92 02:01:52 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech Computer Science Dept, Blacksburg, VA


  I am beta testing our latest clone of UNIX for my university (see above).
It is UNIX 2.1, and we are installing the most needed stuff onto approx.
75 meg out of 100 meg on the HD.  I would like to see this come down a bit,
and think I have solution.  I have it running at 62% capacity (using df -k)
and therefore am really only using about 50 meg of the HD.  However, the
partition remains at 75 meg.  What I am going to try is "optimize" the hard
drive, sticking all of the files in UNIX ROOT in the first 50 meg or so.
Then, by going into amiga dos, I can use HD TOOLBOX to shrink the partition.
Unix swap will need to go directly after the root partition (as I have
already found out).  I have a feeling that this will work as:

1)  I have shrunk the partition by 2 meg (without optimizing), used the new
    space on amiga dos, booted up unix, and shut it down, went back onto
    amiga dos, and everything was intact.

Originally, the new partition was between UNIX ROOT and SWAP, and got wiped,
but it did keep the partition.

So, now to my basic question(s)
 
  Do I have a chance in ???? of getting this to work?  Basically, is there
such a thing as an "optimizer" for UNIX that just reorganizes the files to the
front of the partition.  If so, where can I get such a program?  If you
hesitate in answering because I might destroy UNIX, well, don't worry.  As I
said, I am basically beta testing it, and I can get it RECLONED (basically
reinstalled in about 15 minutes free of charge).  Please, any help would be
greatly appreciated.  If I get this to work, I should be able to "steal"
about 25 megs!!  

Thanks in advance.  It is greatly appreciated.  The whole university will 
"thank" you (at least those using UNIX and wanting more room on AMIGA DOS!)

Once again, thanks...
-- 
+-----------------------+"Frank-n-furter, it's all o-ver
|Keven Ring		|your mission is a failure. Your lifesyle's too extreme
|keven@csugrad.cs.vt.edu|I'm your new commander - You are now my prisoner
|VPI & SU		|We return to Transylvania.
From: robbar@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu (N Baruch robert alla)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Autobauding on /dev/term/ser
Date: 12 Nov 92 04:35:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: aplcenmp.BxL62J.BnF
Organization: Johns Hopkins Continuing Professional Programs

I just recently got a new modem, and now I'm interested in
setting up my /dev/term/ser line to autobaud to support the variety
of dialups.

I'm having problems getting the /dev/term/ser port to autobaud. I've
selected the ttydef that was placed in the /etc/ttydefs file which
is setup to autobaud, however, no luck.  Is there a problem in 2.03
which prohibits autobauding, or am I just missing something?

Robert Baruch
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga