HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: zhang48@wharton.upenn.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: ? about unzipping ZWDOS
Date: 12 Aug 92 21:37:35 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <92225.121516JXL124@psuvm.psu.edu>, JXL124@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
> the following command line, an error message appears:
> 
>         Command line: pkunzip zwdos21.zip
>         Error message: error in zipfile, use PkfileFix...
>                                                            J.Luo

Redownload zwdos21.zip USING BINARY mode.

Hope it helps

Hao
From: lix@BUCRSB.BU.EDU
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Famine during late 1959 to mid 1963 -- (1)
Date: 19 Aug 92 04:11:16 GMT

Some netters suggest me to write down truthfully what I experienced and
observed during the famine. I am a little bit surprised, none has written
before? If no, I'd like to try, but it takes time and I am rather busy.
Comments from knowledgeable netters are welcome. Before I start to write
my own experience, let me cite some digits:

      grain producton    population  consumption per person
                                     grain (farmers) pork  oil
1957                                  100%   (100%)  100% 100%
1958   400 Billion Jing
1959   340 (tax: +17.3)            
1960   287              -10 million   80.6%  (76.3%)  30%  77%
1961   295
1962   320
1965   389.1

These are digits officially publshed by Chinese authority. I tend to
believe they are close to truth. And the populaton decrease of 10 million
in 1960, agrees with estimation of total death in that famine from foreign
sources posted on the net before.

The 76.3% of grain consumption per person (comp. to 1957) may sound not
so serious. It is averaged by the whole country, and the distribution is
not even. The village I once lived, HuaXi DaDui 1st Dui, LianHe Commune,
LuoBa district, HongYa county, Sichuan, suffered a population decrease
of 50% after the three years famine, which was the worst in that DaDui. At
a larger scale, 9 counties of XinYang, HeNan, suffered a death rate 10% in
the year of 1960, it is the champion of the country at this level. While
at the level of province, I am not sure whether the champion was Sichuan
or Anhui, followed by HeNan and ShangDong.

Statistics end here, my personal observation may continue if there is
enough interest and I have time:-(
From: roten@CUBA.gsfc.nasa.gov (Charles Roten)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Holst not know own culture either
Date: 18 Aug 92 16:42:39 GMT
	<1992Aug12.130939.1@cuavax.dnet.cua.edu> <77736@ut-emx.uucp>
Followup-To: soc.culture.china
Organization: /cuba_b/dirbe/roten/.organization
X-Newsreader: GNU Emacs 18.57.1, GNUS 3.13, NNTP 3.10

In article <77736@ut-emx.uucp> joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang) writes:

>In article <1992Aug12.130939.1@cuavax.dnet.cua.edu> 
>54yang@cuavax.dnet.cua.edu writes:
>>I think that Confucius and Confucianism in general emphasizes heavily
>>'tradition', but for Kant not so much. 

>Curiously, Confucius himself didn't spend much time on talking about
>what makes "good" good and what makes "evil" evil.  As a result, his
>disciples had different ideas.

>But it is true that Confucius spend much more time talking about "li"
>ritual, than Kant did.

>>A value system is a set of
>>values and ideas concerning about the truth, the good, and the beauty,
>>and sometimes, the transcendent.  Kant's value system is different
>>from Confucius' value system, but there are many similar ideas in
>>these two philosophers' thought.

>The mere fact that there are similarities in the ideas of Kant and
>Confucius suggests that "values" are transcendent.  If there were no
                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>transcendent values then it would be difficult to explain how two
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>philosophers acting in different cultures independently would could
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>come up with the same answers.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I ABSOLUTELY AGREE !!!!  

Heraclitos sounds a lot like a Daoist .. and IMO that is no accident.  

But having said that, I must also say that *some* values are *not* 
transcendent, but are dependent on culture and circumstance.  

>My own theory is that all difference among value systems among different
>cultures can be traced to differences in answering the questions:

>1. Who is human?
>2. What happens after death?
>3. What does the supernatural world think?

Hmm .. I respectfully disagree.  I suspect that difference in values 
stem from differences in the answers to the following questions.  

1. What KIND OF ANIMAL has the values?  Here, all humans answer the same.  
2. What is the GEOGRAPHY of their home?  This is *very* important IMO, 
   and also very underrated.  
3. What are their mental and physical TOOLS?  Horse collars go far to 
   obsoleting slavery, as do water wheels .. but the early Romans did 
   not have these.  
4. How fast has their society CHANGED recently?  Rapid change causes 
   turbulence in value systems.  The faster the change, the more 
   confusion.  Just look at America ... :-)  

--
Charles Roten | Hughes-STX, Incorporated | 
  roten@cuba.gsfc.nasa.gov               | 'Use the Source, Luke!'
  7601 Ora-Glen Dr., Greenbelt, MD 20706 | 
  301-513-7805 (w),  301-317-0872 (h)    |            Obi-Wan Stallman
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns)
Subject: Re: An open letter to the Emperor Akihito of Japan
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 20:35:25 GMT

In article <7062@bigbird.hri.com.hri.com> blamb@rodan.hri.com (Bill Lambert)  
writes:
> 
> In view of the "Open Letter to the Japanese Emperor" and
> some of the discussion related to that topic, I'd like to
> ask Chinese or Korean readers just exactly would be acceptable
> as an apology from the Japanese government or Emperor, and
> what constitutes "accepting responsibility".
> 
> In other words, what is that the Japanese Emperor could say
> or do during his upcoming visit that would achieve this result?
> Or would anything he said be not enough, or considered insincere?
> 
> I guess this is important, because so many people expect something,
> but I'm not sure that they even know what they expect, and have
> those with expectations set a goal that will satisfy them?
> 
> Please remember, the Emperor as a symbol without power, can only
> use his words. What are the good words he should say?
> 
> Please be frank.
> 
> -Bill Lambert

Agree!

Carl
From: davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: An open letter to the Emperor Akihito of Japan
Date: 17 Aug 92 23:14:29 GMT
Organization: Aegis Society, Kyoto Japan

szhou@romulus.rutgers.edu (Shiyu Zhou) writes:

>As I know, many Chinese, a number of Asian People, as well as some
>westerners, donot like Japs.  I am not thinking about which side's
>fault.  But, if you don't like Japs, you can refer Japan as 'it',
>'its' instead of 'her' which sounds sometimes or somewhat
>uncomfortable though that is western tradition.

Whether you like them or not, why go out of your way to antagonize
them by calling them names they don't like?  For the lack of a
better word you might try 'people' as in 'Japanese people', 'Chinese
people', 'American people', etc. 

[* 
I hate to say this because I'm only a spectator, but according to the
posts that people from China have been putting up, I can imagine 
a bit better why people in Japan aren't jumping at the chance to apologize. 
*]

Dave

--
Dave McLane 
JUNET: davidg@aegis.or.jp (ONLY within Japan: post otherwise)
Nagaokakyoshi, Kyoto Japan Tel: +81-75-951-1168 Fax: +81-75-957-1087
From: shanwang@sara.cc.utu.fi
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Chinese language editor in Suomi
Date: 17 Aug 92 18:07:18 GMT
Followup-To: re: chinese language editor in suomi
Organization: University of Turku, Finland

&>>-----________-----------------______________--------____-------____------____
&>>	Excuse me, this is a test ...
&>>	8*) ......
&>>	Have fun ;)
&>>---__-----____--__--------__________------_____------_____-----_____-----_---
From: lixj@terra.rutgers.edu (Xiao-jian Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: An open letter to the Emperor Akihito of Japan
Date: 17 Aug 92 15:00:44 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

borders@ms.uky.edu (Johnny Borders) writes:

>lixj@sol.rutgers.edu (Xiao-jian Li) writes:

>>apology. It is us people, whose grandparents, parents, brothers and
>>sisters been slaughterd, raped, tortured by the barbarious Japaness
>>soldiers, who deserve an apology from the Japaness. And I believe we

>BARBAROUS Japanese? Well now.. We get to the heart of the matter at last.

Well now, I guess I have to make it clearer. Yes, it was the BARBAROUS
Japanese who invaded China in WWII. I don't think you have got to the
heart of the matter at last. Or you just don't want to. It is too
painful to be reminded the shameful behavior...

No offense to today's hardworking Japanese.

xj
lixj@jove.rutgers.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: test!!
From: tzhong@zeus.calpoly.edu (Tom X Zhong)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 23:17:05 GMT
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

test!
From: yong@minster.york.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: world economy in 1986
Date: 14 Aug 92 11:28:17 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of York, England

The world economy in 1986 was as follows

		GNP in $ billions	shares in global

USA		4,235 			25.4%
EEC		3,626			21.7%
Japan		1,966.2			11.8%
Canada		354.8			2.1%
China (PRC)	274.1			1.6%
Australia	182.1			1.1%
From: joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Questions on chinese stock market
Date: 14 Aug 92 08:26:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: ut-emx.77685
Organization: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas @ Austin

In article <92225.001035XXX100@psuvm.psu.edu> XXX100@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

The following information is from the prospectus of the Greater China
Fund.

>Would any one provide some information related to following questions.
>1. what kind of institutions are on the market?

The current securities market in PRC consists of three parts (1)
over-the-counter markets ("OTC") (2) the Securities Tading Automated 
Quotations System and (3) the SHSE (Shanghai Stock Exchange) and SZSE
(Shenzhen Stock Exchange).  

>2. How many choices may investors have?

As of 92 May 5, there were 34 bonds and 15 equities traded on the
SHSE, and 24 equities in the SZSE.  (The prospectus doesn't mention
how difficult it is for the average Chinese to buy one of these
shares.)

>3. What kind of role does chinese government play?

There is not yet a unified securities law for Mainland China, and both 
SHSE and SZSE operate according to local rules and regulations.  Overall
responsiblity for the SHSE and SZSE belongs to the People's Bank of China
and the State Commission for Restructuring the Economic System.  

A unified securities law is currently being drafted, and securities
laws have been drafted by Xiamen, Guangdong, Beijing, Shenyang,
Tianjin, Shanghai, and Shenzhen.
From: joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Golden age of China?
Date: 14 Aug 92 08:33:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: ut-emx.77686
Organization: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas @ Austin


In article <Bsu5xw.9D0@acsu.buffalo.edu> ningwang@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ning Wang)
 writes:
>Ha, what do the Brits know about China?? I'd say the period between 1800
>and 1949 was the WORST in Chinese history.. Sure the Communists are not good
>but at least they kept the foreigners out

Well, I'm not too sure.  The Five Dynasties/Ten Kingdoms period, the
Three Kingdoms period, the Warring States, the Qin dynasty, and the
Cultural Revolution are all competitors of the "worst" period in
Chinese history.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)
Subject: Re: An open letter to the Emperor Akihito of Japan
    <1992Aug19.210247.9394@news.acns.nwu.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 22:32:41 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:

>Iraq hit Kuwait first instead of the US. 
Vietnam hit the Cambodia first instead of China.  

Now we see the only difference is a UN resolution. American sure is smarter.

>Carl
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.japan,soc.culture.taiwan
From: felix@crowfix.com (Felix Finch)
Subject: Re: An open letter to the Emperor Akihito of Japan
Organization: Scarecrow Repair, Dutch Flat.
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 18:29:23 GMT

Pardon me for being sarcastic and cynical, but I guess I missed the
occasion of China apolgizing to Japan for the long-ago invasion
attempts.  I also missed the more recent apologies of the Chinese
rulers to their own people for Tianmen (sp?) Square.  Please forgive
me for these lapses.
-- 

            ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
   Felix Finch, scarecrow repairer / felix@crowfix.com / uunet!crowfix!felix
From: dliu@ark.njit.edu (Dong Liu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Forwarding - Re: Cannibalism in China - more info
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:07:00 GMT
Organization: Electrical and Computer Engineering, NJIT
X-News-Reader: GNUS 3.14.1 for GNU Emacs 18.58.3

>>>>> On 18 Aug 92 18:12:40 GMT, xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong) said:

Tuya> From: Tuya@ccmail.uoregon.edu
Tuya> Date: 18 Aug 92  10:12 EST

Tuya>           -----------------------------------------------------

Tuya>           How do you define Canibalism?  If that is defined as eating
Tuya>           human flesh, we have the tradition to do that.

Tuya>           1.  Spring and Autumn:  (missing for now)  

Tuya>           2.  Qin2: Liu Bang cooked his father (or intended to) and
Tuya>           shared with xiang4 yu3;

[a lot of more examples deleted]

Don't forget in Shang1, Zhou Wen-Wang ate (although not willingly) his son.

SEE ALSO: 	Feng1 Shen2 Yan3Yi4. :=(.
From: mlt@gdwb.oz.au (Mee Teng)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Who look down chinese most?
Date: 14 Aug 92 00:50:01 GMT

XXX100@psuvm.psu.edu writes:


>=========================================================================
>From: tc2u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Tieju Chen)
>Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
>Subject: Re: Who look down Chinese most? (Re: Japs don't say SORRY to China?)
>Date: 12 Aug 92 18:42:42 GMT

>Well, in my opinion, Chinese people look down on themselves more than
>                     ------------------------------------------------
>anyone else in the world. Let us look back about 20 years ago, when PRC
>-------------------------
>      X Xu

I don't think you need to look back that far, and I don't think
you need to look at the gov't of PRC etc. Just read this
saying.

" If there are 9 Chinese and 1 Japanese in a table of 10 people,
all the 9 Chinese will be talking to the 1 Japanese. On the
other hand, if there are 9 Japanese and 1 Chinese on a table,
the 9 Japanese will only be talking  among themselves. "

Any body care to comment on the above saying which we heard
quite often ?
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 11:59:32 EDT
From: <PXW10@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Right to vote in China

In article <790600194@gn.apc.org>, Tibet-Relay@gnosys.svle.ma.us says:
>Speaking from Geneva, Mr. Wu noted that Beijing's claim that
>"For example, the Chinese Government says that prisoners have the
>right to vote, but the funny thing is I never voted in the 19
>years I was prison, and I don't know of any other prisoners who
>were able to," said Mr Wu.
>

Hi, Wu, don't feel too bad. I was not asked to vote for anything in China
I was not even a prisoner.






Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zliu@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Zhong Liu)
Subject: Re: A wonderful place for Tester and Newuser!
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 20:14:18 GMT

In article <1992Aug21.211833.19482@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> cqu@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Chang-ning Qu) writes:
>
>        Hi, I found a paradise for testing --a newsgroup named "junk",
>I am serious.  I've tried a lot posting and replying before shooting
>the real bullets to SCC. So try it there,  but the *only thing* to 
>remember is *Don't forget fill out the Expires date (one day is the best)*.
>Good luck.
>
>cqu
> 

How do you know that your "real bullets" are not from "junk"?
Just a little bit curious. Give us more on what you've learnt.

Z. Liu
From: zhang48@wharton.upenn.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Information needed on TAX issue
Date: 17 Aug 92 17:59:33 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Aug17.110446.9539@doug.cae.wisc.edu>, yidao@cae.wisc.edu (Yidao Cai) writes:
> In article <Bszvp6.G8x@acsu.buffalo.edu> v999rkjl@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu writes:
>>Hi, netters:
>>
>>The foreign adviser here told me that all the RAs from P.R.China

> It depends on which code you cite.  You have to cite the correct one ( 20(c)? )
> for full exemption.  

It would be better if you can get a letter from your Department/School, 
which specifically points out that teaching  is part of your graduate training
and your  stipend is an award, not the compensation for your teaching services
you provided.  In that case you can certainly cite articel 20(c) in your 
tax return for full exemption.
From: 61l512@cfi.waseda.ac.jp (Hello, how are you ?)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: What about China done to Korea?
Date: 20 Aug 92 03:21:21 GMT
Organization: Dept of Applied Physics, Waseda University
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: wucc.cfi.waseda.ac.jp

In article <1992Aug19.193326.7263@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:
>
>Why should Japan apologize first? It makes no sense! Since China had also done
>terrible things to Korea in the past, Why should we wait after Japan's apology?

Numberless Wars had happened in the history. Asking an apology for a war 
hundreds or thousands years ago makes no sense.

-- 
			61l512@cfi.waseda.ac.jp
From: x0y3510@tamuts.tamu.edu (Xuejun Yang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Japs don't say SORRY to China?
Date: 13 Aug 92 22:26:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.1992Aug13.222645.17644
Organization: ~/lib/organization

In article <ceWQKQy00Uh7E6XmMp@andrew.cmu.edu> tc2u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Tieju Chen) writes:
>By the same token, should we demand the CCP to do the same thing to
>apology to the Chinese people as well????
>
>-tie ju
Aren't we been too uncivilized in using the word "Japs". Talk about
issues, not scolding. It won't solve anything except showing your
own bigotry. I am outraged by the Japanese crimes, but I feel 
extremely ashamed by my countrymen's poor selection of word.
It just doesn't show any class! So please try to act as an educated
person.
From: H.Wang@bradford.ac.uk (H WANG)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Golden age of China?
Date: 21 Aug 92 12:03:11 GMT
Organization: University of Bradford, UK
Originator: 90908648@ccw204

In article <1992Aug21.021809.3196@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> utingli@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Tingli Pan) writes:
>In article <1992Aug20.234802.859@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> cqu@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Chang-ning Qu) writes:
>>
>>    Golden age for old people probably is hundreds or thousand years ago,
>>for young generation should today and tomorrow. Aged people like to recall
>>past, youngster prefer dreaming future.
>>
>>cqu
>
>Would like to say that the Golden age in China is from now to the
>future?
>
>Tingli Pan

I would say so.

H. 
 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.japan
From: xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong)
Subject: Re: What's wrong with HXWZ?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:50:50 GMT

As far as I know, Hua Xie Wen Zhai #73 was posted last night at 9:30 
(my time) but the HXWZ mailing list ccman-l@uga.cc.uga.edu has been 
in trouble that lots of messages have been help there in the machine,
hopefully it'll be distributed by tonight (I just saw the machine
starting distributing messages sent to its lists), see enclosed.

See my next posting for today's HXWZ.

In article <14261@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> szhang@bcm.tmc.edu (Shide Zhang) writes:
>Did anyone receive today's Hua Xia Wen Zhai (Aug 21)? I checked my EMail
>box several times this morning, but 'no mail today' was the only meassage
>I got. I tried ftping ahkcus.org, the latest issue stored there was
>cm9208b.gb (I believe today's HXWZ should be cm9208c).


Date:         Fri, 21 Aug 1992 15:13:36 -0400
From: Revised List Processor (1.7c) <LISTSERV@UGA.BITNET>
Subject:      Output of your job 

LISTSERV@UGA  is a  backbone  server  running version  1.7c  under VM/XA  SP
Release 2.1  and CMS release  5.6 (SLU  208 - 370  mode). There are  39 held
files waiting  to be released.  There is  1 interactive message  queued. The
average CPU time used by LISTSERV is 64.5%. Since LISTSERV was last rebooted
(on 12 Aug 1992  at 17:48, ie 8 days and 21h25  ago), the following requests
have been processed:

- Interactive messages from users   1230
- Sent file/Spooled to messages    46824 (ignored, useless network traffic)
- Network (RSCS) status messages     856 (excludes Sent file/Spooled to)

- Postings to distribution lists    2903 (2903 via DISTRIBUTE)
- DISTRIBUTE jobs (internal)        5666
- DISTRIBUTE jobs (from network)   36761
- Other reader files (jobs, etc)    5896

- Database searches (interactive)     37
- Database searches (batch mode)      95

Summary of resource utilization
-------------------------------
 CPU time:        0.057 sec                Device I/O:     1
 Overhead CPU:    0.006 sec                Paging I/O:     5
 CPU model:        9021                    DASD model:  3380

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Bo Xiong in Chicago
From: H.Wang@bradford.ac.uk (H WANG)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Shut the Hell up! Some of you Netters!
Date: 13 Aug 92 08:55:35 GMT
Organization: University of Bradford, UK
Originator: 90908648@ccw201

In article <1992Aug12.232809.4803@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:
>In article <WYb-ag=@engin.umich.edu> chen@caen.engin.umich.edu (Jian Chen)  
>writes:
>> In article <1992Aug12.154819.10158@news.nd.edu> mm@doge.phys.um.edu (Matt  
>Macura) writes:
>> >There are at least one third of the articles in this Newsgroup that either
>> >sounds really boring or looks really ugly. I don't really understand why  
>some
>> >people keep buffling on something for damn too long. I don't think some of  
>the
>> >guys here should be allowed to shoot craps all over the place like they did.
>> >Clean up the fights, man!
>> 
>> Well, your article is very boring and ugly indeed.
>
>Well, please attack against each other on this topic again. Gentelmen,  
>please! The world is an endless circle, isn't it?! Through each circle, people  
>get to  know this group better and better. What an exposure of nice  
>personalities!!
>
>Carl

Agree with the last one. If we keep talking this way,
people around the world reading 'soc.culture.china' will
only become more and more and more convinced that 
CHINA DOES NOT HAS ANY CULTURE AT ALL!
    
Think it over, ladies and gentlemen.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)
Subject: a (possible) light topic (chi bao le cheng de)
    <1992Aug21.141707.28412@ms.uky.edu> <BtCpx2.3qJ@cs.psu.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 01:09:19 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

wang@math.psu.edu (Feng Wang) writes:

>In article <1992Aug21.141707.28412@ms.uky.edu> gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li) writes:
>>txt15@po.CWRU.Edu (Tao Tao) writes:
>>>Chi1 Bao2 Le1 Cheng2 De4! (don't know)
>>Chi1 Bao3 Le4 Cheng1 De4.(Beijing Hua4)
>How about: Chi4 Bao2 Le Cheng4 De!
	Tianjing Hua (my guess)


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china