From: sgs@stein.u.washington.edu (Steven Smith)
Subject: NL Final Game Score Report 1992, Part 1
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 23:56:45 GMT

    THE NATIONAL LEAGUE GAME SCORE REPORT
              1992 FINAL REPORT
    PART ONE: Season Summary, Leaders, etc.

    Through Games of Sunday, October 4


  Team      G     50+    Pts     Avg.  CW  CND   TND  TL   GM  BM
1  ATL     162   103    9032    55.75   7   15    20  12   11   4 
2  MON     162   102    8759    54.07   5   11    20  17    9   3 
3  CHI     162    99    8744    53.98   6   13    20  20    6   2 
4  NY      162    96    8734    53.91   6   16    21  22    8   3 
5  LA      162    93    8619    53.20  11    8    21  28    6   1 
6  PIT     162    93    8604    53.11   6   22    21  14    3   3 
7  CIN     162    93    8506    52.51  11   13    21  15    3   4 
8  SL      162    89    8410    51.91   9   21    25  12    2   4 
9  SD      162    91    8260    50.99   4   14    19  14    5   4 
10 PHI     162    81    8163    50.39   2   21    14  15    5   3 
11 SF      162    78    8029    49.56   2   19    17  14    4   6 
12 HOU     162    70    7992    49.33   8   21    24   7    2   5 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL     1944  1088 101,852    52.39  77  194   243 190   64  42
              (55.97%)
WEEK       152    88   8,321    54.74   6   12    26  15    7   2
              (57.89%)

50+ = game score of 50 or more
CW = Cheap wins = game score under 50 and starter got win
CND = Cheap No Decision = game score under 45 and starter got no decision
TND = Tough No Decision = game score over 55 and starter got no decision
TL = Tough loss = game score over 50 and starter got loss
GM = Gems = game score of 80 or more
BM = Bombs = game score of 19 or less

        Good  Bad   Tot.
Team    Luck  Luck  Luck  SUPP/9  sd(GS)  IP/G   PCH/G PCH/IP  STRK%
ATL      307  -405   -98   4.43   17.52   6.58   98.12  14.90  62.93
MON      182  -521  -339   4.24   16.02   6.16   92.78  15.05  62.65
CHI      230  -597  -367   3.91   14.83   6.35   94.23  14.85  61.72
NY       195  -654  -459   3.82   16.14   6.37   98.69  15.50  63.85
LA       201  -757  -556   3.40   15.49   6.40   97.46  15.23  61.84
PIT      200  -476  -276   4.40   16.14   6.24   90.43  14.48  63.65
CIN      291  -447  -156   4.39   15.26   6.23   91.67  14.72  63.79
SL       378  -540  -162   3.78   16.07   6.22   88.28  14.20  64.13
SD       197  -344  -147   3.85   16.52   6.14   90.69  14.77  64.09
PHI      232  -337  -105   4.47   16.02   6.21   94.40  15.21  62.76
SF       214  -303   -89   3.51   15.88   5.71   85.23  14.93  62.22
HOU      263  -360   -97   3.69   16.34   5.71   87.57  15.35  62.37
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL   2890 -5741 -2851   4.00   16.02   6.19   92.46  14.93  63.00 
 
Good Luck = Total Luck points in cheap wins and cheap no decisions.
Bad Luck = Total Luck points in tough losses and tough no decisions.
Tot. Luck = Total Luck points.
SUPP/9 = Runs scored in support of starters per 9 innings pitched.
sd(GS) = Standard deviation of game scores.
IP/G = Innings pitched per start.
PCH/G = Pitches thrown per game.
PCH/IP = Pitches thrown per inning pitched.
STRK% = Percentage of pitches that were strikes.

          Highest             Lowest
       1     2     3       1     2     3
ATL   91MB  90TG  88TG     5CL  17CL  18CL
            90JS 
MON   89KH  87DM  85KH    14CH  18BB  20MG
            87CN      		18MG  20DM
CHI   85MM  82JB  81GM    13SB  14JB  23MM
            82GM        
NY    90SF  89DC  84BS     8BS  13AY  18EH
            89BS  84DC
            89DC
LA    93KeG 90KeG 87PA     4OH  21RM  23OH
PIT   90DD  81DD  80ZS    16DD  17VP  18ZS
CIN   86TBe 84TBe 82TBe   12TBe 14TBr 18CH
		          12TBe
SL    86RC  80OO  79DO    13RC  15RC  16OO
                  79MC        
SD    90BH  88AB  87AB     9DE  15AB  16BH
				15GH
PHI   89CS  84CS  81TM    19TM  21TM  22TG
                  81CS    19CB        22DR
			  19PC
SF    85TW  82BS  81BS     8DR  10JB  17TW
			        10GH
HOU   83PH  81DK  79BH     7RB  17RB  18DK
                  79PH          17JJ
 
"Highest" and "lowest" are the three best and worst game scores of the year
for each team.  Letters following the scores are the initials of the pitcher.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Top 10 and Bottom 10 individual starters:
(Started at least one-eighth of team's games)
(47 qualifiers this report; 49 last report)

TR = This Report
LR = Last Report

TR  LR  Pitcher     Team   G    Avg.
 1.  1. Maddux       CHI  35   64.23
 2.  2. Schilling    PHI  26   63.00
 3.  3. Fernandez    NY   32   60.75
 4.  4. Drabek       PIT  34   60.38
 5.  6. Martinez     MON  32   60.31
 6.  5. Cone         NY   27   60.30
 7.  9. Tewksbury    SL   32   59.09
 8.  7. Smoltz       ATL  35   59.09
 9.  8. Rijo         CIN  33   58.73
10. 11. Swift        SF   22   57.50

38. 45. Kile         HOU  22   49.73
39. 39. Schourek     NY   21   49.48
40. 35. Black        SF   28   49.32
41. 41. Ojeda        LA   29   49.21
42. 36. Osborne      SL   28   49.18
43. 42. Henry        HOU  28   49.00
44. 43. Jackson  CHI/PIT  34   48.47
45. 46. Wilson       SF   26   48.19
46. 47. Hammond      CIN  26   47.96
47. 44. Clark        SL   20   47.40

TOTAL POINTS            INCONSISTENT             CONSISTENT
1  Maddux    CHI 2248   1  Leibrandt ATL 21.25   1  Rijo      CIN  9.49 
2  Smoltz    ATL 2068   2  Hurst     SD  19.71   2  Maddux    CHI 11.84
3  Drabek    PIT 2053   3  Belcher   CIN 19.68   3  Gooden    NY  12.16
4  Morgan    CHI 1950   4  Benes     SD  19.11   4  Castillo  CHI 12.37
5  Fernandez NY  1944   5  Smith     PIT 18.84   5  Hammond   CIN 12.82
6  Rijo      CIN 1938   6  Osborne   SL  18.81   6  Fernandez NY  13.24
7  Martinez  MON 1930   7  Glavine   ATL 18.67   7  Nabholz   MON 13.39
8  Tewksbury SL  1891   8  Smoltz    ATL 17.83   8  Ojeda     LA  13.49
9  Avery     ATL 1889   9  GrHarris  SD  17.53   9  Lefferts  SD  13.51
10 Hill      MON 1875   10 Cormier   SL  17.33   10 Jones     HOU 13.51

CHEAP WINS       CHEAP NO DEC.       TOUGH NO DEC.       TOUGH LOSSES
Browning  CIN 3   Harnisch   HOU 6   Swindell    CIN 8   Maddux     CHI 8
Belcher   CIN 3   Osborne    SL  6   Harnisch    HOU 8   KeGross    LA  8
Harnisch  HOU 3   Ojeda      LA  5   Avery       ATL 7   Drabek     PIT 7
Hershiser LA  3   Mulholland PHI 5   Olivares    SL  7   Candiotti  LA  6
Hill      MON 3   Tomlin     PIT 5   Morgan      CHI 6   Fernandez  NY  6
Schourek  NY  3   Burkett    SF  5   Castillo    CHI 6   Gooden     NY  6
Drabek    PIT 3   Jackson    TOT 5   Tewksbury   SL  6
                                                                         
UNLUCKIEST          LUCKIEST          BEST SUPPORT         WORST SUPPORT
Maddux    CHI -233  Browning  CIN 86  Glavine    ATL 5.32  Wilson    SF  2.75
Fernandez NY  -188  Leibrandt ATL 50  Swindell   CIN 4.87  Benes     SD  3.03
Martinez  MON -182  Boskie    CHI 46  Lefferts   SD  4.85  Schourek  NY  3.16
Candiotti LA  -178  Burkett   SF  44  Burkett    SF  4.70  Clark     SL  3.18
Drabek    PIT -168  Reynolds  HOU 39  Jones      HOU 4.61  Candiotti LA  3.21
Hershiser LA  -161  Hurst     SD  36  Cone       NY  4.58  Kile      HOU 3.23
Schilling PHI -121  Reynoso   ATL 34  Hill       MON 4.50  Hershiser LA  3.25
Rijo      CIN -118  Robinson  PIT 32  Gardner    MON 4.47  Castillo  CHI 3.29
KeGross   LA  -116  Williams  PHI 27  Belcher    CIN 4.44  Black     SF  3.41
Castillo  CHI -110  Combs     PHI 26  Mulholland PHI 4.40  KeGross   LA  3.41

GEMS               BOMBS       
Glavine    ATL 4   Leibrandt  ATL 3
Smoltz     ATL 4   Belcher    CIN 2
Maddux     CHI 4   Bowen      HOU 2
Hill       MON 4   Cormier    SL  2
Cone       NY  4   Black      SF  2
Schilling  PHI 4   
                                   
IP/GAME            PITCH/GAME           PITCH/INNING        STRIKE PCT.
Maddux   CHI 7.66  Cone     NY  119.15  RMartinez LA 16.60  Tewksbury SL 67.95
SchillingPHI 7.62  Drabek   PIT 108.56  Gardner  MON 16.59  Swindell CIN 67.79
Drabek   PIT 7.55  SchillingPHI 107.96  Cone     NY  16.36  Fernandez NY 66.86
Cone     NY  7.28  Smoltz   ATL 107.51  Ojeda    LA  16.16  Smith    PIT 66.26
Tewksbury SL 7.22  Fernandez NY 106.66  Kile     HOU 15.91  Hurst    SD  66.22
M'h'land PHI 7.16  Maddux   CHI 106.03  Fernandez NY 15.90  SchillingPHI 66.16
Swindell CIN 7.09  Candiotti LA 104.43  Wilson   SF  15.68  M'h'land PHI 66.02
Martinez MON 7.07  Martinez MON 102.59  Harnisch HOU 15.64  Lefferts SD  65.57
Morgan   CHI 7.06  Gooden   NY  102.03  Candiotti LA 15.51  Cormier  SL  65.55
Smoltz   ATL 7.05  Benes    SD  101.76  Gooden   NY  15.35  Henry    HOU 65.16

Wilson   SF  5.92  Henry    HOU  87.14  Jones    HOU 14.21  Wilson   SF  61.74
Jackson  TOT 5.92  Osborne  SL   87.04  SchillingPHI 14.18  Nabholz  MON 61.67
Henry    HOU 5.92  Burkett  SF   86.09  M'h'land PHI 14.06  Candiotti LA 61.47
GrHarris SD  5.90  Cormier  SL   85.73  Hurst    SD  13.97  Cone     NY  60.55
Gardner  MON 5.84  Smith    PIT  85.00  Cormier  SL  13.90  Morgan   CHI 60.44
Osborne  SL  5.79  GrHarris SD   84.75  Maddux   CHI 13.85  Schourek NY  60.44
Ojeda    LA  5.75  Jones    HOU  84.43  Lefferts SD  13.74  Hammond  CIN 59.99
Kile     HOU 5.70  Lefferts SD   83.15  Swift    SF  13.62  RMartinez LA 59.66
Clark    SL  5.67  Hammond  CIN  82.19  Smith    PIT 13.45  Kile     HOU 58.73
Hammond  CIN 5.55  Clark    SL   80.70  Tewksbury SL 12.33  Ojeda    LA  58.28
-- 
 sgs@u.washington.edu             * "Now, Piniella or Davey Johnson I
 Steve Smith                      *  could live with. But what about
 University of Washington HR-20   *  Chambliss now that Baylor's snatched?
 Seattle, WA 98195                * 		--Me