HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: Need help with ADLib driver
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 22:14:33 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.
Keywords: adlib, windows, sound, .wav

callaci@bcserv.wustl.edu (Callaci (Tom)) writes:

>I am looking for help setting up the sound drivers in order to play the .wav
>files and use the sound accessories in Win3.1.
>None of the system sounds are available with the ADlib driver installed.

The Windows AdLib driver is a MIDI driver, not a WAV driver.  You can
use the MediaPlayer to play CANYON.MID included with Windows.  Wow.

At ftp.cica.indiana.edu, in the /pub/pc/win3/sounds directory is a file
called adlibw.zip.  This driver adds digitized WAV compatibility.  It is
a little bit better than the PC Speaker driver.

You can install both drivers at once, if you like.  As for me, I have
the Windows AdLib driver, the ADLIBW driver, and the FM drivers all
installed at the same time, so I can play WAV, MID, or ROL files (but
not simultaneously!  :)

-- 
#ifdef TRUE        | Fuzzy Fox (a.k.a. David DeSimone)       fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0  |
#define  FALSE  1  |   "If you can't take the heat, you haven't learned
#endif             |      a damn thing from USENET!"  -- Rao V. Akella
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: leeh7@fel.tno.nl (Ed van Leeuwen)
Subject: 32bit disk access?
Organization: TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 12:25:59 GMT

Dear Setuppers,

I have the following configuration:
80386DX/40
4 MB internal RAM
120 MB external RAM (fixed disk)

My question is:
Do I need/want to check the "32bit disk access"
box or not?



					Regards,

					Ed.

===============================================================================
Ed van Leeuwen                        |  Ed W.A. van Leeuwen
FEL-TNO                               |  TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory
's-Gravenhage                         |  The Hague, the Netherlands
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed.van.Leeuwen@fel.tno.nl             |  WARNING: do not feed the lions
===============================================================================
From: talley@magic.aca.mcc.com (Jim Talley)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: General protection error under Windows. WHY??
Date: 30 Sep 92 00:57:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: magic.TALLEY.92Sep29185748
	<1992Sep15.115404.3399@titan.ksc.nasa.gov>
Organization: MCC, Austin, TX 78759, U.S.A

In article <1992Sep15.115404.3399@titan.ksc.nasa.gov> prevo@blot.ksc.nasa.gov (Joe Prevo) writes:

   In article <1992Sep13.220249.1@sara.cc.utu.fi>, ipe@sara.cc.utu.fi writes:

   >>>
   >>>I have following problem: I am running Windows 3.1 and Dos 5.0
   >>>in 386-40 with 4 M ram and Windows is giving me following error
   >>>all the time
   >>>
   >>>xxxx caused general protection failure... closing application
   >>>
   >>>This happens with almost every program and at any time.
   >>>Furthermore I am not able to start any DOS-application in 386
   >>>enhanced mode, but in standard mode I can. In enhanced mode
   >>>windows tells me that I do not have enough memory, but when I
   >>>look how much I have free system resources It tells me that I
   >>>have over 5 Megs free.  Could this be due to this AMD processor
   >>>or perhaps problem is with the AMI bios settings? Could somebody
   >>>who has this AMD 386-40 processor and fully functional windows
   >>>running send to me his bios settings? My bios is dated 7.7.91.
   >>>
   >>>Ipe
   >>>

   I see the general protection failure just as you explained it on my
   INTEL 386-25 with 4Mb. I don't see the DOS-application/enhanced mode
   problem you described though. What frustrates me is that the GPFs can
   occur when closing ANY application, yet I have a second machine which
   IS an AMD 386-40 which is setup up with almost the same setup (both
   hardware and software) and it doesn't experience any problems! It makes
   me wonder if its a BIOS or PC chipset related.

   I saw a note in here earlier about somebody solving some of their problems
   by starting windows with "win /d:xsv". Can anyone tell me what it does?
   I'd like to know before I attempt to use it. The last time I "just" tried a
   quick fix, I found myself reinstalling windows.

   Any help would be greatly appreciated!
   Joe


I also get regular GPF problems when exiting certain programs (esp.
Borland TPW) or even starting up certain programs (Ghostscript f/
Windows) under 3.1.  My problems almost always involve the 80387
emulation DLL, e.g.

   xxxxxxxx has caused a General Protection Fault in Module
   yyyyy.DLL (I forget the name) at address 0001:0129 (I think)

My system, a Compaq Portable 386 w/ 3MB, has (true Intel) 387
installed.  Are your problems also with the 80x87 emulator DLL?
Anyone else experienced these symptoms, or know of a solution?  Any
pointers would be appreciated.

				-- Jim
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Jim Talley
MCC (Neural Networks)                talley@mcc.com  (preferred addr.)
UT--Austin (Linguistics)             jtalley@emx.cc.utexas.edu
From: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu (K. M. A. Rahman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Bold PCL soft font--no print!
Date: 3 Oct 1992 17:30:41 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

In article <1992Oct3.170315.29767@leland.Stanford.EDU>, wkn@leland.Stanford.EDU (Ken Neighbors) writes:
|>[Fonts]
|>Bitstream ITC Garamond Book in cy000wlp=CY000WLP.FON
|>Bitstream ITC Garamond Book Italic in cz000wlp=CZ000WLP.FON
|>Bitstream ITC Garamond Bold in da000wlp=DA000WLP.FON
|>
|>[HPPCL,LPT1]
|>prtcaps=52104
|>winver=310
|>FontSummary=C:\tools\win31\FSLPT1.PCL
|>sfdir=C:\FONTS\PCL
|>sfdlbat=C:\TOOLS\WIN31\SFLPT1.BAT
|>SoftFonts=9
|>SoftFont1=C:\FONTS\PCL\CYPR0100.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\CY0100WH.HPF
|>SoftFont2=C:\FONTS\PCL\CZPI0100.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\CZ0100WH.HPF
|>SoftFont3=C:\FONTS\PCL\CYPR0120.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\CY0120WH.HPF <-normal
|>SoftFont4=C:\FONTS\PCL\DAPB0120.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\DA0120WH.HPF <-bold
|>SoftFont5=C:\FONTS\PCL\DBPE0120.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\DB0120WH.HPF <-bold italic
|>SoftFont6=C:\FONTS\PCL\CZPI0120.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\CZ0120WH.HPF <-italic
|>SoftFont7=C:\FONTS\PCL\DAPB0140.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\DA0140WH.HPF
|>SoftFont8=C:\FONTS\PCL\DBPE0140.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\DB0140WH.HPF
|>SoftFont9=C:\FONTS\PCL\CEPB0160.PFM,C:\FONTS\PCL\CE0160WH.HPF
|>
|>Thanks for any help.
|>Ken
|>wkn@leland.stanford.edu

	This looks OK to me. The next thing I'd check is under
	[FontSubstitutes] to see if any other font has been
	substituted for those two fonts. And make sure under 
	[TrueType] you have 
	TTOnly=0.

	-Anis.
From: cjohnson@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Christopher Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Using mouse in Win3.1 DOS window?
Date: 2 Oct 1992 00:09:26 GMT
Organization: The University of Westrn Australia
Distribution: world,local
NNTP-Posting-Host: tartarus.uwa.edu.au

mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) writes:

>In <92274.204112KCHAN@ESOC.BITNET> <KCHAN@ESOC.BITNET> writes:

>>You need a MS mouse driver version 8.0 or later. Don't know about other
>>mice. How to get MS mouse driver version 8.0 (legally?) - contact MS customer
>>service on (800)-426-9400.

>Isn't this actually on the Windows 3.1 disks (you have to expand it by
>hand, though, because the install won't)?

Yeah, I think the plain old 2-button mouse driver is, but does anyone
have a dos mouse driver for the mouse-systems 3-button mouse to allow me
to have it in a dos window?
I once managed to get a little square cursor to appear on norton
commander, but it showed no signs of moving, and I've since forgotten
how I even did that.

Any help would be greaty appreciated, thanx in advance,

Chris.

ps look for mouse.co_ on the windows disks. =8')
--
__________________________________________________________ When Something
Christopher Johnson         | this letter was written     |can go wrong it
cjohnson@tartarus.uwa.oz.au | using 100% recycled         |Segmentaion fault
johnson@swanee.ee.uwa.oz.au | electrons                   |Core dumped         | I reserve the right to be totally wrong!
From: mhart@blackjack.dt.navy.mil (Michael Hart)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Improve startup speed
Date: 2 Oct 92 15:59:05 GMT

In <1ahnj6INN5im@shrike.und.ac.za> katz@lourie.und.ac.za (Moran Katz) writes:

>When starting up Windows, it seems to take FOREVER to display the programme
>manager.  

>Technical details:  Windows 3.1
>                    486DX-50  (256K internal cache)
>                    32 Mb RAM (10Mb Ramdrive, 2Mb Smartdrive, rest extended)
>                    1Gb Micropolis HD
		     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Do you have a permanent swap file?  If not, Win is checking the entire
drive to see how much space is available for a swap file.

Try setting (In control panel, under 386 enhanced) a permanent
swap file of 12MB or so.  I think this will solve your problem.

If you already have a permanent swapfile....never mind.

In any case, please post whether this or some other tip solves your
problem.,


--
|   Michael G. Hart                   mhart@blackjack.dt.navy.mil    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     You think _I_ speak for the government or the navy?  HAH!      |
| Aviation, computers, quality improvement, Northern Exposure, money |
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Problem in Sending/Receiving files
From: Stephen Gibson
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:31:41 PDT
Organization: Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 


In article <1992Oct1.134226.24691@das.harvard.edu> gordy@das.harvard.edu (Robert Gordy) writes:
>I have a Gateway 486/50 with 16 Meg of RAM.  I recently bought
>QEMM 386 to replace emm386.exe.  The reason I bought the thing
>is because I wanted to be able to use expanded or extended memory
>interchangably (extended for Windows and expanded for a couple of
>games).
>
>Anyway, I installed the program and it works okay except I seem
>to loose about 2 Meg of memory when I'm in Windows (as compared to
>the amount of memory I have when I use emm386).  When I run
>the diagnostic programs that came with QEMM, I see that I have access
>to all my memory as expanded, but the amount of extended memory
>I have access to is 2 Meg less.
>
>My brother uses QEMM on his 386/25 with 8 Meg of memory.  He has no
>problem (ie. windows sees the same amount of memory using QEMM as it
>does when he uses emm386).  I copied his autoexec.bat and config.sys
>and I install QEMM the same way he does.
>
>Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Rob Gordy

You need to add a SIMILAR statement to your QEMM386.SYS line in your 
CONFIG.SYS:

  DEVICE=C:\QEMM\QEMM386.SYS RAM /EMBMEM=16384
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^

By default, QEMM will only recognize 12MB.  The EMBMEM 
statement listed above will allow your 16MB to be fully used by 
QEMM (Note: 16 x 1024 = 16384).  Check your QEMM docs for more 
information (and correct syntax!).  Hope this helps!

Stephen Gibson
Sonoma State University
eMail:  gibsonst@sonoma.edu    - OR -
        Stephen.Gibson@sonoma.edu


Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: int704v@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Mark Cosham)
Subject: Re: How to start in 386 enhanced mode ?
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 06:55:28 GMT

brown@NCoast.ORG (Stan Brown) writes:

>In article <1992Sep28.084311.18791@a.cs.okstate.edu> saeed@a.cs.okstate.edu (SAEED FAISEL) writes:
>>I have a 386/40 compatible & win 3.1.
>>
>>1. How can I want always start windows in 386 enhanced mode ?
>>
>>2. How can I make windows to make most use of the 4 MB ram ?
>>   I am currently using the following config.sys
>>
>>	DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS
>>        DOS=HIGH,UMB
>>        DEVICE=C:\DOS\EMM386.SYS 1024 RAM
>>        . . .
>>
>Your two questions have the same answer.  Change RAM to NOEMS.

>Note to everybody:  It's really worth spending some time with the
>chapters in the DOS 5 and Win 3.1 user's guides on configuring and
>optimizing the system.  

Just be aware that that disables the EMS (Expanded memory) support and if
the expanded memory isn't being used then it will make very little
difference.

Mark
-- 
 Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
-----------> <-------> <-------> <-------> <-------> <-------> <-----------
 Mark Cosham   Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    int704v@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au       cosham@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: kak1@cypress31.cray.com (Kevin Kramer)
Subject: 16 colors only during windows
Originator: kak1@cypress31
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 29 Sep 92 09:39:09 CDT


Is there a way to force windows into a 640 x 480 resoulution
with only 16 colors.  I have Trident TVGA and downloaded the
drivers off of cica, but they just don't look right.  And 
they only had a 800 x 600 16 color driver (no 640 x 480 x 16).
I am not sure of the specific chipset, do I have to look on
the SVGA card dor this?  I got the computer pre-assembled and
do not think that I have the manual for this.

What we are doing is transfering BMPs and GIFs between the
the IBM and the MAC and would like to force the IBM to the
same graphic resolution as the MAC to see how well the 
palletts look after the conversion.

Thanks,
Kevin

Kevin.Kramer@cray.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: oosten@ee.ualberta.ca (Brian Oostenbrink)
Subject: Turbo Pascal 6.0 crashes??
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 18:19:39 GMT


I have loaded Turbo Pascal 6.0 under windows 3.1 using windows' 
application setup.  If I run standard mode, everthing works fine,
but in enhanced mode the system crashes.  Occasionally I will get 
the message "System integrity violated due to illegal instruction.
Close Windows and restart computer."  Other times it will simply 
lock up.  Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

thanks
Brian Oostenbrink
Univ. of Alberta
From: h8915726@hkuxb.hku.hk (Loser)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Postscript Printer Control Win 3.1
Date: 6 Oct 92 18:55:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: hkuxb.Bvpr82.Hoq
Reply-To: h8915726@hkuxa.hku.hk
Organization: who cares?
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

gardner_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Andy Gardner) writes:
: When printing to a postscript printer from Windows, Windows
: inserts a Ctrl-D at the start and end of the file before
: sending it to the printer.  THis is a printer reset for
: postscript printers.
: 
: If you do not require a printer reset at the start of the 
: document, you can put a line "CtrlD=0" in the WIn.ini in
: the printers description area.
: 
: This is just dandy, but I need to get rid of the Ctrl-D
: at_the_end of the document, as it is causing big problems
: with my printer sharing device (ie resetting it before the
: whole job has been sent to the printer).
: 
: Does anybody know of a line that can be added to WIN.INI
: that will stop Windows inserting the Ctrl-D at the end 
: of the print job?
: 
: Thanks
: Andy Gardner       
: Wellington, New Zealand

	Try to print the file as .EPS, you have to select this
	in the Printer setup. Don't know why it makes the difference
	:-)

--
Chris Lo
University of Hong Kong
H8915726@hkuxa.hku.hk
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: kbm8572@zeus.tamu.edu (BRYAN MILLIGAN)
Subject: SCSI problems (was RE: 32 bit access and SCSI drives)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:17:00 GMT

	Thanks to everyone who sent me e-mail to tell me they had a similar
setup and were having no problems.  Unfortunately, I still can't get my
system to work with a swapfile.  I did notice that everyone who was having
success with SCSI drives had an Adaptec 1542B controller; I have an Adaptec
1542A controller.  Someone did imply that Adaptec held their cards tight in
regards to the controller specifications; that makes me wonder if there
are some differences between the 1542B and the 1542A that Microsoft does
not know about.  It only makes sense that MS writes code to support the
latest version of this hardware; however, what are the owners of older
versions supposed to do?  Is there a ROM upgrade policy?


bryan

kbm8572@zeus.tamu.edu (VAX 9000)
bryan@aero15.tamu.edu (Sun 4/65)
(409)845-0714         (Panasonic Easa-Phone)


Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: dwj@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Daniel W. James)
Subject: Running Windows 3.1 with a full complement of comm ports.
Keywords: help me
Organization: Sacramento Public Access Unix
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 23:15:20 GMT

I have a problem (or have had a problem for the past few months).
I use my system at work (a 486DX) to access our unix system via serial
lines.  I also use the system to print to a laserjet (also over serial
ports).  The systems were previously set up with serial switch-boxes so
that a comm port would access only one or the other.  This was back in the
days when everyone was using 6300 PC's with only one serial port available.

Now we have 4 serial ports available so I thought "...great, we can dump
the a/b boxes, run windows, and access the database in a window, and print
from word-perfect in another window"

Of course, this means that including the mouse, 3 comm ports are needed.  I
was warned about interrupt sharing problems, but a knew that if I worked
long enough, I'd come up with a solution.

I was finally able to get all the comm ports working outside of windows
with the following connections (please let me know if this isn't the way
you'd do it)

COM1:Mouse Driver (Address 03F8H, Interrupt 4 -- Standard)
COM2:Laserjet     (Address 02F8H, Interrupt 3 -- Standard)
COM3:Disabled on the serial card
COM4:Serial Connection via Procomm Plus
	  (Address 02E8H, Interrupt 5 -- Standard Address, Interrupt stolen
                                         from LPT2)

This configuration works very well, as long as I stay in DOS, but as soon
as I try to access COM4 (either windowed or full-screen), I get a few
garbage characters, and then the whole system locks up--I can't even use
the three-finger exit.

If anyone can shed some light on this problem, I would be forever in their
debt.  I worked on and off for the last few months just trying to get
either COM3 *OR* COM4 to communicate...  This problem finally solved, it
does me no good unless I can run under windows.

Perhaps Interrupt 5 is a problem?  LPT2 is disabled on the serial card as
well.

PLEASE HELP A DESPERATE PERSON, PLEASE!!!

Thanks in advance,
Dan.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________________
Some folks try to multiply from sunrise to  |          dwj@sactoh0.SAC.CA.US
Sunset--leave behind more of their kind so  |       ames!pacbell!sactoh0!dwj
no one will forget             -- Level 42  |(This space available for rent)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris)
Subject: Re: I need some help on enhanced mode start up
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 15:34:53 GMT

wagner@andersen.uucp (Wags Man) writes:

>I keep getting this message when I type win
>wina20.386 must be in root of boot drive to run in enhanced mode..

>What is this file and where does it come from?

>It is not on any of my installation disks?

>ps. I'm talking 3.0, please no flames and no upgrade suggestions.

WINA20.286 is distributed with DOS 5.0.  It is used *only* with Windows
3.0 under DOS 5.0; it is ignored with any other combination.

See section 4.3 in the MS-DOS 5.0 README file.  Use the EXPAND command
(loaded into the C:\DOS directory when MSDOS is loaded) to expand
the compressed distribution file.

Joe Morris / MITRE
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: fuzzy@netcom.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: Improve startup speed
Organization: Foxes 'R' Us - Seven locations to serve you
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 06:26:40 GMT

mcglob@usissc.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Brian.McGloin) writes:

>.>Do you have a permanent swap file?  If not, Win is checking the entire
>.>drive to see how much space is available for a swap file.

>Better yet, set Win 3.1 with NO swapfile.  Windows will perform much better.

I have tested this on my 300 MB SCSI system and found that the Windows
startup time does not change AT ALL based on swapfile settings, whether
using a permanent, temporary, or no swap file.

Just my $.04

-- 
#ifdef TRUE         | Fuzzy Fox                  fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0   | a.k.a. David DeSimone      an207@cleveland.freenet.edu
#define  FALSE  1   |   "Verily, thou art indeed a fool."   -- Chuckles the
#endif              |         Jester, moments before his untimely death.
From: gordy@das.harvard.edu (Robert Gordy)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: QEMM and Win 3.1
Date: 1 Oct 92 13:42:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: das.1992Oct1.134226.24691
Organization: Aiken Computation Lab, Harvard University

I have a Gateway 486/50 with 16 Meg of RAM.  I recently bought
QEMM 386 to replace emm386.exe.  The reason I bought the thing
is because I wanted to be able to use expanded or extended memory
interchangably (extended for Windows and expanded for a couple of
games).

Anyway, I installed the program and it works okay except I seem
to loose about 2 Meg of memory when I'm in Windows (as compared to
the amount of memory I have when I use emm386).  When I run
the diagnostic programs that came with QEMM, I see that I have access
to all my memory as expanded, but the amount of extended memory
I have access to is 2 Meg less.

My brother uses QEMM on his 386/25 with 8 Meg of memory.  He has no
problem (ie. windows sees the same amount of memory using QEMM as it
does when he uses emm386).  I copied his autoexec.bat and config.sys
and I install QEMM the same way he does.

Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

Thanks in advance,

Rob Gordy
From: mf4f+@andrew.cmu.edu (Mark Fichman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: installing a HP DeskJet
Date: 27 Sep 92 10:27:24 GMT
Organization: Graduate School of Industrial Administr., Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

I have Windows 3.1, and I want to add a HP DeskJet 500.  I connected the
printer to the parallel port, and it works fine under DOS.

When I try to install it under Windows, I am only offered com1 or com2,
not lpt1 (the parallel port).  When I check ports on the control panel,
I just get com1-4, no lpt1 or lpt2.  

I looked in win.ini and there are only two com ports listed.  I
reinstalled 3.1, and still got the same problem.

Where is lpt1, and how do I get to it?

I am running on a ZEOS 386/33 machine.

Thanks,


Mark Fichman
GSIA
Carnegie-Mellon University
Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890

mf4f@cmu.edu
From: laviers@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Cocotte Minute)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Need Roland PR-1012 printer driver for win 3.1
Date: 28 Sep 92 06:52:13 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

NOTE: Sorry if this is a repeat, but my news server has been kinda flaky.


Hello,

      I recently obtained a Roland PR-1012 printer.

Does anyone here have a driver for Windows 3.1 for it? 
(or know where to get one) 

I've tried the driver for the Roland 9101 (?) from cica.cica, but
it doesn't work with the french accents. Since I will be writing
in french, I need to be sure to have all those special characters. :)

Also, could that someone tell me how to configure the
dip switches for it? (stardard or IBM mode?).

Thanks!

Sebastien
--
_____________________________________________________________________________
|Sebastien Lavier [Calimero]    | Centre de recherche, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur  
|laviers@iro.umontreal.ca       | "The opinions expressed here are mine and  
|Universite de Montreal, Canada |   should also be yours!"
From: ralf@ark.abg.sub.org (Ralf Stephan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: Another cc bug
Date: 05 Oct 92 15:28
Organization: Magick Shoppe, Gurth City

Um, just noticed, the bug also appears this way:

enum foo { A, B, C };
struct bar { enum foo mode:8; };

main()
{
  struct bar baz;
  enum foo i=0;

  baz.mode = i;
}

So take care of your enums...

--ralf