HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: davidsen@yeti.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PP and Gateway v.32bis modems
Date: 8 Apr 92 19:39:03 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <465.212.uupcb@yob.sccsi.com>, bill.garfield@yob.sccsi.com (Bill Garfield) writes:

|  Granted the M/T product line is upper echelon stuff, price wise, but it
|  IS quality mdse., and what's most important, Made in the USA!

  Depends on your priorities. I want something which works, and is
reliable. If that leaves more than one produce I select based on vendor
and price. I will pay somewhat more for US made, but it's not on my
"must have" list. Buying something which doesn't work, from anyone, is
charity, and I believe in the free market.
-- 
	- bill davidsen (davidsen@crd.ge.com)
	GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
By analysis of usenet source, the hardest part of C to use is the comment
From: a566@mindlink.bc.ca (Arne F. Hermann)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ATD/Zuckerboard 2400bd Ext. Modem - InfoQuerry
Date: 9 Apr 92 04:11:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: mindlink.11330
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada

I am looking for information on an ATD 2400baud external modem, "model"
ZCOM24\EXT.  I have the beast but lack the power adapter.  What I need to
know is, what voltage and current ratings does the adapter have?  Even the
bloody manual doesn't say.  If you know of an address for the company that
built the thing (ZuckerBoards or ATD) that might help too.  Also, their is
no reference at all in the manual for the internal DIP switches.  Help re:
that would be appreciated to.  Response to this in the group AND via e-mail
would be greatly appreciated (addr. a566@mindlink.bc.ca).
                                                        Tx,
                                                             -Arne

--
<<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>>
<< Arne F. Hermann            "The urge to say something wise is in inverse >>
<< a566@mindlink.bc.ca         proportion to the ability to say it."        >>
<<vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv>>
From: davidsen@yeti.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: What is it with Supra?
Date: 17 Apr 92 19:56:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: crd.1992Apr17.195623.6163
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <1992Apr17.035452.1725@pilikia.pegasus.com>, william@pilikia.pegasus.com (William Kwok) writes:

|  Does Egghead do mail order?  What is the number (toll-free if possible)?
|  Direct Micro has it but says they're backordered for 6 weeks.

  1-800-EGG-HEAD.
-- 
	- bill davidsen (davidsen@crd.ge.com)
	GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
By analysis of usenet source, the hardest part of C to use is the comment
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.mac.comm
From: jackb@mdd.comm.mot.com (Jack Brindle)
Subject: Re: Supra V.32bis (Disappointment)
Organization: Motorola, Mobile Data Division - Seattle, WA
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 20:39:57 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.181239.12720@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> berger@atropa (Mike Berger) writes:
>
>Now, the PC has a versatile serial port.  You plug in a standard
>RS232 device and it works as expected!  That's versatile.
>--

You know, we could get it a big flame fest here, but it would not be
productive. You will hold to your beliefs and I to mine. I have worked
with the Mac's serial ports in both asynchronous and synchronous modes
for quite a while at rates from 110 bps all the way up to over 500 Kbps.
I also have worked with those on the PC. The PC's ports work well as long
as 1) you stay at or below 9600 baud and 2) you write your own driver.

I use a PC for specific purposes (one of which involves data communications).
I also use the Mac for many applications including communications systems
development. Each has its place. When I want to communicate at fast rates
without the need for an additional intelligent communications board, I
use the Mac.

Enough of this garbage. Flames to /dev/null.

Jack Brindle
ham radio: wa4fib
internet: jackb@mdd.comm.mot.com
From: davidsen@yeti.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Cardinal 9600 v32 FAX/MODEM
Date: 6 Apr 92 14:48:16 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <92093.170404EG7QC@CUNYVM.BITNET>, EG7QC@CUNYVM.BITNET writes:
|  For those who asked, the cardinal modem is a pc _internal_ modem.
|  It's available at the Staples Office Supply Chain. 1-800-333-3330.
|  Item no. 260687. And it's mentioned in Spring/Summer 1992  Catalog.

  So is this really V.32, or is it one of those 96/24 Fax/modem things?
And if it's V.32, is it any good?
-- 
	- bill davidsen (davidsen@crd.ge.com)
	GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
By analysis of usenet source, the hardest part of C to use is the comment
From: gerald@gold.sub.org (Gerald Nowitzky)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: 'Invisible' Modem
Date: 17 Apr 92 02:06:31 GMT
Organization: Unix Mailbox Baldham

It's really a Problem (at least for me):
 
How can I connect two modems via a leased line in a way, that the modems
appear 'invisible' on the RS232 side. After power up or after DTR getting
active, they should establish a connection. Unfortunately I cannot convince
the aplications on the RS232-Side to send commands like ATA or ATD to the
modems. So my questions are:
 
- Is it possible to configure the EEPROM of a Hayes-compatible modem to act
  like this? If it is possible, how does the Init-String look like ? (For
  price reasons, I would like to use modems wit SIERRA-Chipset).
 
- What (cheap) modems can I use for this ?
 
The one, who offers me the best solution will get a bottle of high-proof,
royal bavarian Gebirgsenzian (=schnapps, the best I know) from me.
 
Thanks !                                        Munich, 16.4.92
 
(Gerald)

--
gerald@gold.sub.org (Gerald Nowitzky)
Unix Mailbox Baldham    08106-34593 PEP/V.32    08106-34692 HST
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:6264 comp.sys.mac.comm:4434
From: jeffp@ocelot.csc.wsu.edu (Jeff Parke)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: Supra V.32bis (Disappointment)
Keywords: supra, v.32bis, v32bis, mac, macintosh
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:04:35 GMT
Reply-To: jeffp@ocelot.csc.wsu.edu.UUCP ()
Organization: Washington State University

In article <1992Apr3.230641.16672@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jsm2r@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (John S. Mitchell) writes:
>As a proud owner of a brand new SupraFAXModem v.32bis (SN 158), I of course
>got right down to trying the thing out. It didn't take long to run into a
>problem, and the story from Supra Tech Support was less than thrilling:
>
>Using the modem on a Mac IIsi, I set my software for hardware handshaking
>and a communication rate of 57600 (computer to modem). Much to my chagrin,
>the text that came through from all the bbs's I tried was marred by
>numerous dropouts, i.e. characters were missing in places where they should
>have been. This also happened if I changed the settings to software (XON/
>XOFF) flow control. 
>
>Supra Tech solved my problem but only by dashing my hopes and dreams.
>Their story was that the Mac serial port can connect to modems at no better
>than 19200 baud. Turning down the speed indeed solved the dropout problem,
>but as the Supra guy told me, it effectively eliminated making use of the
>speed advantage of v.32bis or data compression at high connect speeds.
>Supra told me that the only way to use that extra speed capability was to
>buy an add-in card with high speed serial ports. (Said something about
>needing ports that can do UART [?])
>
>My question to the net is, doesn't this seem a little fishy? I've known
>people who use Macs with USR HSTs with what seemed like full speed capability.
>Likewise, these same serial ports can be used with LocalTalk networking that
>operates at 250kbaud. Somebody tell me Supra is off their collective rocker,
>and that I can make full use of this inexpensive (but not THAT inexpensive)
>modem.

I have one of the supra v.32bis modems and have done very well at
57000 baud.  You need a cable wired for hardware handshaking, and, as one
well intentioned but otherwise encephalopathic person said, you need to execute
the at&f1 factory recall for a mac with hardware wired cable.  I suppose
there may be macs who have flaky serial ports (powerbook?) but my SE/30
has handled v.32 and v.32bis connections flawlessly at 5700, with
appropriate zmodem transfer speeds.

I would check my cable wiring if I were having this problem, or suspect
a faulty modem, or a faulty UART in the mac.  It is not supposed to happen
this way.
-- 
Jeff Parke jeffp@ocelot.csc.wsu.edu  OR ...uunet!ocelot.csc.wsu.edu!jeffp
AOL: JeffParke   CIS:71511,1512    Wash. State Univ. College of Vet. Med.
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Supra v32bis (Initial Review)
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 92 11:47:24 EDT
Organization: Izot's Swamp

dkf8117@tamsun.tamu.edu (Duane) writes:

> The modem WILL NOT recognize a BUSY signal (tho it's supposed to) but my
> friend has the same modem (with a higher serial number) that has no
> problem detecting and returning a BUSY result.  I have heard several
> others say that they too are unable to detect busy.  I am assuming this is
> a hardware error (yes my settings are fine) and will be fixed.

   I had the same problem with my GVC Super Modem 9600; it would not detect 
busy signals on the same 2 lines that Hayes and Everex modems handled 
perfectly.  A board (courtesy of GVC's Canadian service reps) swap did not 
solve the problem.

   I moved the modem, and the problem went away.  I chalked it up to some 
attribute of Toronto's 239 exchange (fairly ancient equipment).

Geoffrey Welsh, 412-305 Margaret Avenue, Kitchener Ontario, N2H 6S4 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, { watmath!xenitec | m2xenix }!zswamp!geoff (519)742-1228
"Show us your sig." "Seeg?  I don't need no steenking seeg!"
From: larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: sz and rz in UNIX
Date: 11 Apr 92 13:15:46 GMT
Organization: Feeds-R-Us

marc@r-node.gts.org (Marc Fournier - System Admin) writes:

>	Check your filenames.  I always have a problem if the file
>that I want to download has a format such as 'file.tar.Z' with the
>two '.'s in it.  As soon as I get rid of the second one, it downloads

the problem is on the dos side -- not the UNIX site --

we use zmodem all the time to transfer files on the unix box 

and sz file.tar.Z works just dandy here on our machines --


-- 
 =*= Larry Snyder, Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-0777 - 10 lines =*=
      internet: larry@gator.rn.com        uucp: uunet!trauma!larry
From: bourman@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Bob Bourman)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 18:41:45 GMT
Subject: Re: Modem specification: MNP and v.xx
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems

/ hpcc01:comp.dcom.modems / wwang@cs.ulowell.edu (Weidong Wang) /  9:35 am  Mar 17, 1992 /

>I am sure this is a CAQ and must have been posted many times. But ...

>Can someone tell me what are MNP and v.xx for modem specification? I
>think one is for error detection, the other is for data compression. But
>which one is which?

>Thanks.

>ww


-- 
            >CSNET/INTERNET: wwang@cs.ulowell.edu  (Weidong Wang)
----------

	Down and dirty:

	V.21/B103 = 300 bps
	V.22/B212 = 1200bps
	V.22bis = 2400bps
	V.32 = 9600bps
	V.32bis = 14.4 bps

	MNP 2-4 = error correction
	V.42 = LAPM/MNP 2-4 error correction

	MNP 5 = 3:1 compression
	V.42bis = 4:1 compression
From: adler@nic.cerf.net (Bruce Adler)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: who sells BLAST?
Date: 12 Apr 92 04:42:57 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: CERFnet

It's sold by Communications Research Group which is a subsidiary
of US Robotics. The CRG phone number is 508-923-0888. I've got
an old copy of Blast but haven't yet tried it.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: robichau@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Paul Robichaux)
Subject: Re: Answers from Supra
Reply-To: robichau@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov
Organization: New Technology, Inc.
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 12:55:47 GMT

In <rlcarr.0245@animato.uucp> rlcarr@animato.uucp (Rich Carreiro)
quotes from his question-and-answer session with a Supra-droid:

>[9. I run a UUCP node.  Does the sysop deal apply?]
>9. You may qualify for the sysop program.  Calls sales at 1-800-727-8772 and
>they can send you a form to complete.

If you call sales, they will send you a form. Unfortunately, none of
the people I talked to knew UUCP from CCCP, and when I included a
brief written summary on the form itself, I received a polite note
that basically said "we called your number to try to log in and
couldn't, so you must not be a BBS."

Give it a try- your mileage may vary.

-Paul


-- 
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG          | NTI doesn't pay for my opinions, and NASA
robichau@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov   | doesn't know I have any.
	     This message printed on recycled phosphors.
From: qualtrak@netcom.com (Qual Trak)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problems - Telebit T3000's thru a a digital switch
Date: 15 Apr 92 14:12:19 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)


I am attempting to run a Telebit T3000 modem thru a digital switch and
am having some difficulty.  I can call out and get a reliable V.32bis
(14,400 bps) connection but calling in is a different matter.  I can't
establish any kind of reliable connection (even v.32).

If I call in with another T3000 the modems will connect at v.32bis and
try and negotiate error correction and finally give up and disconnect.

If I call in with another T3000 with S50=6 the modems will connect v.32
but unless I'm lucky (say once every ten calls) the modems will spend
most of their time retraining.

If I call in with another T3000 with S50=3 I'll usually get a reliable
v.22bis 2400 baud connection.

If I call in with a ZyXel set to v.32 4800 baud I can connect reliably.


The switch is an AMTELCO digital switch.  I have been told that there
are two sets of lines, one set for incoming calls, and one set for
outgoing calls.  I have also been told that "The problem couldn't be in
the switch".  I have also been told that Pac Bell only guarantees a
2400 baud data rate and if I want better, I'll have to go 4 wire.

So... After being told I can't get there from here (or more literally
that I can't get here from there) can I get any recommendations as to
what process I need to go through to solve my problems.

I can think of one for starters - talk directly with the telephone
engineer maintaining the digital switch in my building.  Which I'll try
and do..

------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Birchfield - QualTrak Corp (408) 730-2674
jb@verite.QualTrak.COM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern)
Subject: Re: Supra V.32bis (Disappointment)
Reply-To: andrew@cubetech.com
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 15:29:36 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.001144.27864@jato.jpl.nasa.gov> jack@jato.jpl.nasa.gov  
(Jack Kobzeff) writes:
>  You should need the card the Supra person referred to only if you want
>  multiple ports running faster then 19200 AT THE SAME TIME.
>  
>  Jack Kobzeff     (jack@jato.jpl.nasa.gov)

That's not true...  I know tons of people who run both ports at 38.4 at the  
same time...  The trick is to have them both controlled by the same program  
that can essentially assume control of the whole computer and effectively  
schedule CPU time to both ports since the Mac can't multitask.


andrew
-- 
andrew@cubetech.com
Andrew Loewenstern            |  "listen: there's a hell of a good universe
Cube Technologies, Inc.       |   next door; let's go." --- e.e. cummings
From: S02337%FLC@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: INFO-MODEMS Digest V92 #211
Date: 6 Apr 92 17:49:02 GMT
Organization: The Internet

Hi modulators,

Can a modems functions be seperated so that instead of or inaddition to
being plugged in to a telephone, the modem out/in put could be saved on
audio magnetic tape for later re- in/out putting.  After all the evolution
toward handshaking and error checking I know that this is backwards thinking
but it might have some usefull purposes.  Maybe survival conditions disk
failure backup,,,,,

Thanks, Mitch s02337@flc.colorado.edu
:)
:)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: Brian Fellows
Subject: Re: Xremote software available?
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Distribution: World
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1992 13:44:36 GMT

In article <1992Mar31.180943.26744@helios.physics.utoronto.ca>
khann@bullet.ecf.toronto.edu (KHAN  NAJEEB MOHAMMED) writes:
>The subject says it all.  I can't afford to buy an NCD
>X-terminal.  Is there any software that runs under windows
>or under OS/2 (or even DOS) that would support the NCD
>xremote protocol?
>

I heard just the other day that Visionware's XVision Version 4.1, due out in
another month, will support XRemote.  Xvision is an X-Server that runs under
Windows 3.0.  I am very intreested in seeing how well it works.
 
>Thanks,
>
>Najeeb.
>-- 
>
>Don't you just hate .sigs?
>
From: davidsen@yeti.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Maximum Length of serial cable
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:02:12 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <1992Apr2.053307.29126@unixg.ubc.ca>, stat656@unixg.ubc.ca (John Paul Morrison) writes:

|  Sorry, this is not what I meant. Obviously, the characteristic impedance of
|  a transmission line doesn't vary with what you put into it!

  The capacitance doesn't vary, but the effective resistance sure does!
I think that's what you mean.

|  It was stated earlier by someone that for 19200bps you need less than 2500 pF.
|  My question should have been more precise: how does this *rated* capacitance
|  vary with the speed you would like to run at? In other words, what kind of
|  cable do I need to switch to.

  You should be careful to distinguish between what works in theory and
what works in practive. In practice I have seen both reliability where
it was not to be expected (76.8kbit over 100ft of lamp cord) and failure
where everything was well in spec (9.6kbit over 20ft of ribbon cable).

  There are some values in the RS-232 spec, or other line specs you
might use, and cable vendors rate their cable. I certainly don't want to
quote any values off the top of my head, or speand the time looking it
up, either ;-)
-- 
	- bill davidsen (davidsen@crd.ge.com)
	GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
By analysis of usenet source, the hardest part of C to use is the comment
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver)
Subject: Re: Are 16550'a pin compatible with 16450's?
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 17:12:56 GMT

In article <sxrjr_d.gerg@netcom.com>, gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews) writes:
> In article <1992Apr8.195056.16953@sj.ate.slb.com> poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) writes:
> >jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu (Jim Lick) writes:
> >:
> >: For the last point, the software which doesn't know about the 16550 will
> >: still benefit, but not as much as one which does.
> >
> >No. If the software can't enable the FIFO on the chip, it will act EXACTLY
> >like a 16450, with NO improvement at all
> >
> 
> Not completely true, I'm afraid.  If the software used the more proper
> method of checking the Data Ready bit in the Line Status Register and
> reading bytes from the UART until that bit turned off, that software
> would work better when the buffers are enabled.
> 
> Most programs that aren't 16550-aware don't do that.  They simply read a
> single byte from the UART and exit.  They certainly won't benefit from
> having the buffers enabled.
> 
> But there were a few out there that had receive routines that kept reading
> from the UART until the UART told them to stop.  Those ones did benefit
> when an outside program enabled the buffers for them.  Even though they
> didn't have any 16550-specific code.


Again, are you absolutely certain of this?

My National Data sheet strongly implies that that the FIFOs are bypassed in
16450 mode, which means that a 16550A is EXACTLY like a 16450.  If the
FIFOs were on while in 16450 mode, common and obvious 16450 software would
break.  Such software WOULD NOT WORK, albeit in subtle and uncommon ways.

Any reasonable UART driver will always read data bytes until data-ready is
false, regardless of whether you have a 16450, 16550, 8530, 16681, 8251,
8274, etc etc etc.  This is because while you are processing the first byte
in the buffer, the shift register is accumulating the next, and by the time
you store away the first byte, increment the pointers, etc, the second byte
may be ready.  If you just exit, depending on the interrupt hardware, you
may lose the interrupt.  You generally check data-ready before grabbing
the first byte, because the interrupt may be suprious.

I have never, in 24 years of playing with modems and serial I/O ever seen
of an implmentation where the interrupt handler simply assumed one exactly
byte/interrupt.  Never.  I believe you when you such garbage code exists,
but I have never seen it and don't want that changed.


Vernon Schryver,  vjs@sgi.com
From: gsnow@clark.edu (Gary Snow)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Supra V.32bis (Disappointment)
Date: 8 Apr 92 15:48:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: clark.1992Apr8.154836.1511
Organization: Clark College, Vancouver, Wa.  USA

In article <9568.29E24D76@ofa123.fidonet.org> Jeff.Lindstrom@ofa123.fidonet.org (Jeff Lindstrom) writes:
|
|Your limited speed with your Mac is disappointing, but not limited to
|your own setup.  I have read several messages having to do with people
|who only have a 16450 UART in their system, limiting their speed as
|well. They have to upgrade t o a 16550 UART to get full speed.
 
Thats not the problem, the Mac has never had the dreaded UART problems
that the PC Clones seem to have at times.
 
Gary

-- 
-----
Gary Snow
uunet!clark!gsnow  or  gsnow@clark.edu
From: Jeff.Lindstrom@ofa123.fidonet.org (Jeff Lindstrom)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: SupraFaxModem V.32bis
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 92 12:41:24 PDT
Organization: Universal Electronics Inc. (Public access BBS)

  At 57,600 bps, I have a problem with my accelerated (25 MHz 68030) on my 2000 under V1.3 if I am running an 8-color ANSI screen.  I haven't lost any data (that I have noticed), but the screen update can be up to 1.5 minutes after the data flow on an ASCII capture of a 250K text base.
  The screen update keeps up with the data flow (just barely) if I use a 2-color screen.


--  

Jeff Lindstrom
Internet: Jeff.Lindstrom@ofa123.fidonet.org
Compuserve: >internet:Jeff.Lindstrom@ofa123.fidonet.org
From: popkin@news.cs.odu.edu (Brian N. Popkin)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Practical 9600sa
Date: 16 Apr 92 22:27:00 GMT
Organization: Old Dominion University Dept. of CS, Norfolk VA
Originator: popkin@monsoon.cs.odu.edu

Dear Netters:

I would wonder if someone would please email me some help.

I just bought a practical 9600sa modem.. I cannot figure out
if it does v32bis?  I am new to the high speed modem world.

I have telix v3.15 and have it set to 38,400.

When I connect to other high speed modems that I know will do 
38,400 I canot get mine to go any faster then 1070 CPS..

any suggestions?

thank you,

brian

popkin@cs.odu.edu
From: SMITHBS@PURCCVM.BITNET (Barry Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Zoom 14.4 v.32bis
Date: 10 Apr 92 00:11:46 GMT
Organization: Purdue University

I know that these aren't shipping until May, but do any netters have
any comments about the Zoom v.32 and related products?