HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Wednesday, 12 Aug 1992 09:26:39 EST
From: Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: STEVE FRANKLIN Fails Miserably
 <lefty-110892103039@lefty.apple.com> <BsuHnn.582@cs.dal.ca>

In a 358 line mewl to Lefty, Steve Franklin wrote:

>  I'm not awfully intelligent

Exiguous Stevie appears to be getting a clue.

>I pride take my writing in. I don't expect people to take me serious in
>posts

Never fear dear, you won't be disappointed in this regard.

>   YOu realy think I"m a visible idiot do you?

Can't speak for Lefty, but I certainly do.

>You don't think there are even a few people grinning at this post?

Oh I bet there are many laughing at you Stevie.



Linda
--
They're complicated people leading complicated lives, and
he complicates their problems by telling complicated lies
     The Flag, Barenaked Ladies
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: democratic platform
Date: 15 Aug 92 21:28:01 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise

kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) writes:
-> >ps - My use of last names is neither inappropriate
-> >nor hostile.
-> 
-> Your continued use of Mr. Ezekiel's last name, in
-> the manner he himself has characterized as "rude",
-> is both inappropriate AND hostile.

this from the same twit who called susan garvin a
"lying bitch" and who never offered any evidence
whatsoever to support this claim.

this from the same twit who attacked susan garvin by
attacking the fact that her SO had been sexually
abused.

mr. darcy knows a lot about what is appropriate for
others.

	"Mr. Darcy you have elevated hypocrisy to an art form."
			Linda Birmingham
			<92126.142810ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>


-- 
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12227 alt.evil:2383
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.evil
Subject: Re: All this recent discussion
Date: 19 Aug 92 16:23:51 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.

In article <26727@life.ai.mit.edu> daz@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (David A. Z.) writes:
>        I was the one who was arguing AGAINST blanket assertions.  Ie:
>Asain women aren't _really_ just the same as other women since they are
>much tighter on the vast average than other women.

Why do you suppose?
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "This must be Thursday.  I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
                                                       - D Adams
  - Patrick Taylor
    Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                       "Don't let the .se fool you"
    alternately, exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jjcox@oregon.uoregon.edu (Joshua Cox)
Subject: Re: Homosexuals are like the rest of us, right?
Organization: University of Oregon Computing Center
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 18:47:32 GMT

> In article <1992Aug12.011130.4069@udel.edu> carroll@mercury.cis.udel.edu (Mark C. Carroll) writes:
> 
> [to Clayton Cramer]
> 
> > If you come back to reality, and look at the normal homosexuals [...]
> 
                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
And then our boy Theodore Kaldis - In article <Aug.12.07.31.03.1992.24980@romulus.rutgers.edu>, kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis) reponds:
> 
 
> I would submit, rather, that it is Mark C. Carroll who needs to return
> to reality: the term "normal homosexual" is in fact an oxymoron.
                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Maybe someone should see that this moron gets some oxygen, too many brain cells have been damaged and he clearly isn't capable of rational thought.

Come on, Ted, you've got to admit that what these folks do is none of your business unless they're doing it to you.  Regardless of whether or not you're just repressed, you should still be able to identify that within any group, there are certain established norms just as there are in the homosexual communities.  Doubtless, you would argue that within the group "humanity," homosexuality falls outside established norms.  I challenge you to investigate other successful cultures (and by successful, I don't ne



cessarily mean technologically advanced, just surviving and happy) who use homosexual rituals as a means for population control and maintained social structure.

See? You can be straight *and* objective.  You aught to try it sometime.

-Josh
"If I can't use fear to control the people, what do I have left?"
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Subject: Re: STEVE FRANKLIN STRIKES BACK!
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 18:01:39 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <BsxBoz.9r@cs.dal.ca>, franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (<<<***Steve
Franklin***>>>) wrote:
> 
> In <og29v64@fido.asd.sgi.com> cj@eno.wpd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio) writes:
> 
> >We're all in LeftyLand, then.  Poor Steve can't get a visa,
> >and he's stuck at the border.
> 
> >Lefty can drive from Cupertino to Palo Alto to have a cuppa
> >Heart-o-Darkness with me any time he wants to.
> 
>    Heh. Who's we? Define "all".

Gosh, Steve, isn't it obvious?  We're talking about all the _interesting_
people, the ones worth spending time with.  Clearly this doesn't include
you, Dennis, Darcy, Rasmussen and the other life members of Psychotics 'R'
Us.

> Seems to me that we need more sanctions against LeftyLand then. I'm stuck at > the border, because apparently they won't let me bring a social life across > the border.

Opinions may vary at centers of culture like Dalhousie University, but
around here obsessive masturbation doesn't constitute "a social life".

> No one half interesting is allowed in LeftyLand. Only computer geeks. Hardly 
> fair is it?

Yes, the millions of us down here decry the unfairness of it all on a daily
basis.  We're very upset that we're deprived of the presence of such
paragons of nineteen-year-old wit and sophistication as yourself.  It's a
miracle that we manage to get by.

A hard existence, but we bear with it somehow.

>    I am jealous though. Never once have I been invited for a cuppa 
> "heart-o-darkness".

I'm certain you've never been invited to anything other than an act of
self-immolation.

> However, I've never been a fan of Joseph Conrad anyways.  He's so 
> depressing.

Funny.  He feels the same way about you.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12039 talk.abortion:31478
From: franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (<<<***Steve Franklin***>>>)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: STEVE FRANKLIN STRIKES BACK!
Date: 13 Aug 92 13:19:47 GMT
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In <og29v64@fido.asd.sgi.com> cj@eno.wpd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio) writes:



>In article <BsuHnn.582@cs.dal.ca>, franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca writes:
>|  Heh - Lefty, I did ask you to concede to a superior being. However, this
>|was not for MY benefit but yours. No longer should you remain in your
>|"LeftyLand" where all sorts of wierd things happen... This is one
>|wierd land where Lefty thinks:
>|   a) he has friends
>|   b) he is intelligent
>|   c) he is important
>|   d) he is going to be remembered 20 years after he dies
>|   e) he is happy...

>We're all in LeftyLand, then.  Poor Steve can't get a visa,
>and he's stuck at the border.

>Lefty can drive from Cupertino to Palo Alto to have a cuppa
>Heart-o-Darkness with me any time he wants to.

   Heh. Who's we? Define "all". Seems to me that we need more sanctions
against LeftyLand then. I'm stuck at the border, because apparently
they won't let me bring a social life across the border. No one half
interesting is allowed in LeftyLand. Only computer geeks. Hardly fair is it?
   I am jealous though. Never once have I been invited for a cuppa 
"heart-o-darkness". However, I've never been a fan of Joseph Conrad anyways.
He's so depressing. 

steve
-- 
aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
zx.cfranklin@ug.cs.dal.ca,sk;t;lrut[Superboy@ac.dal.cav.zx,Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: <<<***Steve Franklin***>>> - Minister of Asterisks
Date: 16 Aug 92 11:45:00 GMT
Organization: TSAKC-TC

In article <BsoEBo.DFI@cs.dal.ca>
        franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (<<<***Steve Franklin***>>>) writes:

]In <lefty-070892181412@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
]>Why else would you be so shamelessly sucking up to Kevin?
]
]   I haven't sucked up to a single individual.

But what about Kevin?

]I assure you that post-graduate studies will be a piece of pie.

Wow, that's impressive.  Were you first in your class?


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu (John G. Robinson)
Subject: Re: Yelps from a pitiful moron
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Followup-To: alt.dev.null
Distribution: world 
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 15:27:17 GMT
X-Posted-From: psy7.psy.utexas.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Aug19.014045.16007@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu
(Stephen A Chaney) writes:
> 
> In article <lefty-170892101250@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
> 
> [ More yelping from a blast crater left after that devastating attack by
> Steve Franklin, deleted. ]
> 
> Lefty, you remind me of Saddam Hussein as he, like you, still claims
> victory in a battle in which you clearly have been annihilated.  
> 
 

Chaney, you remind me of an insufferable little puke who has nothing better
to do than pound your keyboard in vain hopes that the snot boogers will
eventually fall out.  Next time you get the uncontrollable urge to
cross-post to talk.abortion, how about making at least a feeble stab at
_talking_ about _abortion_?  Hey!  Now there's a concept!  You ought to
know a little bit about abortion, at least.  Judging from your rantings and
ravings, you have all the earmarks of being the product of a botched one.

Or, if you prefer to remain in alt.flame, how about trying to _flame_
somebody?  Hmm?  Maybe not; that would require you to be coherent and
germane, qualities which you have proved over and over you are incapable of
understanding the very basics of.

No, I guess neither of these choices is a possibility for you.  Your only
hope is to post to alt.dev.null; that way, you can masturbate to your
heart's content without bothering anybody else.

===============================================================================
> 			Robert Casey for President '96! 
> 			 This Casey never strikes out.
> ===============================================================================
> ===============================================================================
> BBBBBB     OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    Founder: Steve Chaney 
> B    B     O      O   S         S          <chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu> 
> BBBBBBBB   O     OO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    
> BB     B   O     OO        SS        SS    Borg Operating 
> BBBBBBBB O OOOOOOOO O SSSSSSS O SSSSSSS O  Space Systems, Revision 2.0 
> 
> 	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 
> 
> Alias Borgie Boy, the BorgBarian, Inturdgent, Propeller Boy, and other
> scornful names heaped upon me during my lifetime...

W0WZERZ!!!!  K00L SIG, D00D!!!!  Y D0N U AD 0N 2 IT???

**********
John G. Robinson                 "I don't blame you personally, mind,
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu    I hold the entire world responsible."
                                  --Maj. Charles Emerson Winchester III
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12044 aus.flame:3233
Date: 13 Aug 92 01:06:37 GMT
From: osborn@socs.uts.edu.au (Tom Osborn)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,aus.flame
Subject: Re: Product Announcement: I. S.

gritzner@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Thomas F. Gritzner) writes:

>Tweet tweet tweet tweeeeeeeeeeeet

>It is five minutes to 12. Here are the news from Netherworld(TM).

>SYDNEY II. As recently known, the concern Gozerian Tools Inc.(FREE) presents a
>new model of a artificial brain device called Iain Sinclair. They have
>provided their announcement with a large excuse for the last introduced model.
>They regret the unexpected stupid behaviour of this carefully constructed
>artificial intelligence. They admit that the erroneous behaviour including
>writing lame flames terrorizing UseNet comes from bugs in /usr/bin,
>/etc/net.config and /usr/man/mann/clue.l. The last crossposting has shown the
>progress of the fault propagation. The new model will be connected off from
>UseNet, even if misc.test will be the appropriate Newsgroup to check out how
>the new Iain Sinclair works. To the question of practicability of the project
>the speaker of Gozerian Tools Inc. confirms that Iain Sinclair was intended to
>be a more intelligent seatbelt ...  >		Thomas F. Gritzner

Wow, Iain get's fan mail from Germany.

Do you think this guy is trying to get a Visa into Australia?

Is he looking for a Visa to get into Ultimo? (Fat chance).
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12195 talk.abortion:32562
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Tuesday, 18 Aug 1992 09:40:03 EST
From: Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
 <1992Aug13.062501.3311@rotag.mi.org> <92227.153636ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
 <1992Aug17.214651.21493@rotag.mi.org>

In article <1992Aug17.214651.21493@rotag.mi.org> Kevin Darcy says:
>In article <92227.153636ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> Linda Birmingham writes:
>>Kevin Darcy wrote in article <1992Aug13.062501.3311@rotag.mi.org>:
>>>>kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes

>>>The actual words were more like "Fuck you! I was raped!". Then I realized I
>>>was mistaken, and shortly thereafter admitted error.

>>What utter bullshit.  You consider 7 days and 25 responses
>>"shortly thereafter",

>No.

There's hope for you yet lad.

>> [...]
>>>From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
>>>Message-ID: <1992Jul26.204803.20411@rotag.mi.org>
>>>
>>>[the response to Ms. Garvin's SO explanation]
>>>
>>>>Yes, as in, speaks from experience.  From the ages of 9 to 13, I
>>>>was sexually abused.
>>>
>>>Thank you for that vital piece of information, Mr. Virtual S.O., maybe
>>>next time you toss out titillating little references like this, you'll
>>>learn to provide some CONTEXT with them so folks will know what the hell
>>>you're talking about, hmmm???

>This was the first post where I admitted not understanding the original
>post.

Where did you admit anything Kevie dear?

>Glad I could clear that up for ya, Linda...

Darcy the only thing you've cleared up is that you
are the net's Energizer Bunny, you just keep going
and going and going.



Linda
--
They're complicated people leading complicated lives, and
he complicates their problems by telling complicated lies
     The Flag, Barenaked Ladies
From: chrisl@stpaul.gov (Chris A Lyman)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: 13 Aug 92 15:32:59 GMT
Organization: City of Saint Paul Public Works

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:

> {tar, feathers, noose around the neck, the whole bit...}

I always suspected that you couldn't dress yourself.

-- 
Chris Lyman  -  email: chrisl@pwcs.stpaul.gov  -  #include <std.disclaimers.h>
 "A conservative government is an organized hypocrisy." -- Benjamin Disraeli
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 21:46:51 GMT

In article <92227.153636ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> writes:
>Kevin Darcy wrote in article <1992Aug13.062501.3311@rotag.mi.org>:
>
>>In article <1992Aug10.162419.258471@cs.cmu.edu> Jonathan Hardwick writes:
>>>kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes
>>>> I have still yet to hear any kind of credible rationale as to how someone
>can
>>>> get "hurt" by the obviously-mistaken statement of a complete stranger: if
>>>> someone walked up to you in the street and said "Hey! You're Bobby Hatchett
>>>> the notorious axe-murderer!", would you be "hurt" by that, assuming no-one
>>>> actually believed him, and he admitted his error as soon as it was pointed
>>>> out to him? Doesn't sound very "painful" to me...
>>>
>>>Act 1, Scene 1: A street in suburban America
>>>
>>>Darcy: "Hey, you're Bobby Hatchett the notorious axe-murderer!"
>>>John Doe: "Huh?"
>>
>>The actual words were more like "Fuck you! I was raped!". Then I realized I
>>was mistaken, and shortly thereafter admitted error.
>
>What utter bullshit.  You consider 7 days and 25 responses
>"shortly thereafter", 

No. But I _do_ consider less-than-one-day "shortly thereafter"...

> [...]
>
>From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
>Subject: Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1
>Message-ID: <1992Jul26.001305.18495@rotag.mi.org>
                        ^^^^^^
>
>[the first Darcy post]
>
> [...]
>
>From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
>Subject: Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1
>Message-ID: <1992Jul26.204803.20411@rotag.mi.org>
                        ^^^^^^
>
>[the response to Ms. Garvin's SO explanation]
>
>>#Willing to explain, as in, speaks from experience?
>>
>>[Direct quote from my SO]
>>
>>Yes, as in, speaks from experience.  From the ages of 9 to 13, I
>>was sexually abused.
>
>Thank you for that vital piece of information, Mr. Virtual S.O., maybe
>next time you toss out titillating little references like this, you'll
>learn to provide some CONTEXT with them so folks will know what the hell
>you're talking about, hmmm???

This was the first post where I admitted not understanding the original
post. 

Glad I could clear that up for ya, Linda...

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney)
Subject: I wanna be Lefty's Friend! NOT!!! (was Re: STEPHEN CHANEY STRIKES OUT! (or: Hey, Franklin, Look Who's On _Your_ Side!)
Organization: California State University: Sacramento
Distribution: world 
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 21:39:47 GMT

In article <lefty-120892193508@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>Well, I was wrong.  I said that nobody would come to Stevie Franklin's
>support.  I forgot about the Borg Invasion Fleet.

The same fleet that is in the process of stomping the screaming hell
out of Mark Ira Cough Man. :)  

>In article <1992Aug12.223904.3027@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu
>(Stephen A Chaney) wrote:
>> 
>> This article is the absolutely most devastating thing I have ever seen
>> in my entire stay on USENET.
>
>Undoubtedly this is a fair indicator of just how little time you've been on
>the net.

I've been here since almost a year ago. And the devastation that
Franklin laid against you was not only funny in its jokes, but in its
unprecedented accuracy. 

>> No single human being could possibly take
>> this much damage in one sitting and not go absolutely crazy.

[ Lefty's dud response, a la "Franklin splattered me flatter than Mark
Ira Cough Man's wife's tits but that only made him look bad," deleted. ]

>
>> Even "Borgie Boy" (yours truly) couldn't take hits like this...
>
>Really?  I thought you were impervious to everything, including logic,
>common sense, ordinary decency and intelligence.

No, that was you. Get your face outa that mirror. 

>> >def: anal-ostrich: n, One who, rather than bury his head in the sand
>> >insists on burying it up his ass.
>> 
>> That's a classic. A pure, original classic. Let's just stop and give
>> this one a hearty round of applause because frankly, it is dead
>> accurate.
>
>Which leads to the question: what _is_ the sound of one fool clapping?

It's the sound of you talking. 

>> Have mercy on the kid, Steve!
>
>Oh, certainly.  It's evident just how distressed I am.

Or how numb your brain is? 

>--
>Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
>C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.


===============================================================================
			Robert Casey for President '96! 
			 This Casey never strikes out.
===============================================================================
===============================================================================
BBBBBB     OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    Founder: Steve Chaney 
B    B     O      O   S         S          <chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu> 
BBBBBBBB   O     OO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    
BB     B   O     OO        SS        SS    Borg Operating 
BBBBBBBB O OOOOOOOO O SSSSSSS O SSSSSSS O  Space Systems, Revision 2.0 

	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 

Alias Borgie Boy, the BorgBarian, Inturdgent, Propeller Boy, and other
scornful names heaped upon me during my lifetime...
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 18:49:04 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <1992Aug12.020846.7594@cfctech.cfc.com>, kevin@cfctech.cfc.com
(Kevin Darcy) wrote:
> 
> In article <1992Aug10.031935.11328@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
> >
> Nevertheless, my two points remain valid.  (1) the subject of child sexual 
> >abuse was *not* broached by Ms. Garvin.  (It was broached, as you corrected 
> >me, by Chaney.)
> 
> As already pointed out, his .sig referred to concensual adult/child sex, not
> rape.

At the time this came up, there was nothing in Dennis' .sig relating to
whether the situation was _consensual_.  That came the better part of a
week later, after Chahallney had been pasted thoroughly over his statement
that "Pro-choice means pro-child/adult sex".

> >(2) Don's comment was in response to the stupid and insensitive comment
> >by Suzanne Forgach.
> 
> Larry, there's a big difference between discussing such matters in detached,
> abstract generalities, on the one hand (as Suzanne was doing), and admitting 
> "I was raped" on the other.

I would hardly call Suzanne's characterization of sex education as sexual
abuse of children "detached" or "abstract".

> I still maintain that Don was the first to truly hammer the issue home in 
> talk.abortion. And I also maintain that the wording of his post was 
> ambiguous, and the braggy, confrontational tone was HIGHLY 
> unusual for a revelation so intimate and personal.

How interesting that you (and lately, Mr. Steve "Head-is-Fried" Franklin)
seem to be having trouble with this.

> I was thrown, and ended up making a bad assumption.

Have you ever made a _good_ assumption?

> I've apologized. Why does this flamewar need to rage on and on?

Because based on your continued postings on the subject, where you
repeatedly attempt to foist off the blame onto Susan, your apology is
meaningless.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12002 talk.abortion:31339
From: cj@eno.wpd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: STEVE FRANKLIN STRIKES BACK! (moderately funny for me anyways)
Date: 12 Aug 92 17:35:57 GMT
Reply-To: cj@sgi.com
Followup-To: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA



In article <BsuHnn.582@cs.dal.ca>, franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca writes:
|  Heh - Lefty, I did ask you to concede to a superior being. However, this
|was not for MY benefit but yours. No longer should you remain in your
|"LeftyLand" where all sorts of wierd things happen... This is one
|wierd land where Lefty thinks:
|   a) he has friends
|   b) he is intelligent
|   c) he is important
|   d) he is going to be remembered 20 years after he dies
|   e) he is happy...

We're all in LeftyLand, then.  Poor Steve can't get a visa,
and he's stuck at the border.

Lefty can drive from Cupertino to Palo Alto to have a cuppa
Heart-o-Darkness with me any time he wants to.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12125 talk.abortion:32042