From: azhar@duke.cs.duke.edu (D. Salman [Quintessential] Azhar)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Clinton/Gore '92??!!!! Was Re: WhyIsSwineProhibited? Answer.
Date: 13 Oct 92 13:28:50 GMT
Organization: Duke University Computer Science Dept.; Durham, N.C.

In article <Bw0u9G.HrD@ucunix.san.uc.edu> minhaszt@ucunix.san.uc.edu (Zafar T Minhas) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.145601.27827@sarah.albany.edu> ys3359@thor.albany.edu (Yazmasterj) writes:
>>*  Yasmin Sohrawardy                *                                    *
>>*                                   *         Clinton/Gore '92           *

>I find it surprising that you at least tacitly support Clinton/Gore. 

	   I don't at all, especially considering the lady believes in
everyone's right to develop their own value system (and that is
complete anti-thesis of conservative republicans).

>One of the questions was about the Palestinian issue....And how Israel should 
>give the peace process a chance and indirect support for Palestinian autonomy.
>The usual bullshit. Lied right through his teeth. 

	   Now, it is my turn to be surprised! Do you expect US to
discontinue supporting Israel on this planet? Surely not! Do you
expect US to support a peace agreement which does not satisfy all
demands by Israel? Surely not!

>In a written statement Clinton
>said he would not support the upholding of East Jerusalem as a seperate ethnic
>are for Palestinians. Clinton couched ethnic cleansing, Israeli style, in a morepolitical manner.

	   Who does? No US President can afford to do that, and not risk
losing all its PAC money. It is about time, we accept USA's
uninhibited support for Israel, regardless of the candidates. Having
said that, I must say that Clinton-Gore is the most pro-Israeli ticket
in the history of this country. Nevertheless, that is not the only
issue in world, neither is it in American politics.

>On the question of Kashmir the representative was hesitant he said that the US
>is obligate to make a balancing act and should do as much to contain the 
>situation, basically meant that Clinton would keep the status quo in Kashmir.

	   And, we should be glad for that. Kashmiri people are seeking
to rescue themselves from clutches of foreign interference (primarily
India) already. It hurts to see compatriots endorsing USA's role as
world police.

>I feel sorry for Kashmiri people.

	   Being a Kashmiri, I not only feel sorry for them, but also
recognize that the solution must come from within.
>
>It is true that Pres. Bush bobmbed the hell out of Iraq, but there was oil, tell
>me which President would not have done so? 

	   I hope that no one supports Bush because you want interference
in a country's integrity. If Saddam raped Kuwait once, Bush can't seem
to get enough of raping Iraq. What gives US the right to enforce a no
fly zone in a territory that does not belong to them? Is this newage
colonialism? If it weren't for Saddam none of this would have
happened, if it weren't for Bush, Saddam would have not been alive
right now. 

>I don't want my taxes raised, especially since I'm on the verge of making mucho
>dinero. I don't want a consistently pro-Israeli, anti-Pakistan foreign policy 
>the way democrats are so expert in implementing. Perot '92. 
>zafar

	   Perot is the next worst thing after white supermist. We would
be well-advised to find what he really stands for... not USA, but UWA
(United Whites of America). 

	   Salman [dsqa-jna '92 :-)] Azhar

-- 
 I must, with emotional fire, burn or illume myself
 I must, with the heat of passion, melt or sublime myself
 I must, in flood of tears, drown or cleanse myself
 I must! I must! I must! For my people and myself -- D. Salman [Q] Azhar