HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: female v. male bisexuals.
Date: 8 Oct 92 04:07:50 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620


 mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:

> Even if you can't relate to that, such talk tends to smooth the path to
> safer sex, if you still havent got that figured.  There's no longer
> "that condom moment" problem when you've made talk part of your sexual
> activity.

Huh? I'm all for talk, but I don't see that it makes that condom moment
disappear. If you discuss how much latex you're taking to bed with you |-),
then you don't have the problem of enquiring at an inopportune moment if, um,
<blush>, mumble, it might not be a good idea, but there's still a point at
which the latex has to be employed...

There definitely still is a condom moment for me to share, talk as I do.

Tanaqui
From: fenthe@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Kilroy
Date: 16 Oct 92 11:57:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: drycas.1992Oct16.165756.2285
Distribution: soc.bi
Organization: Carnegie Mellon Computer Club

In article <1992Oct14.235156.5104@infodev.cam.ac.uk>, crj10@phx.cam.ac.uk (Clive Jones) writes:
> Thinks: If Fenthe wants to see it too, this could be the opportunity
> for us to meet? Plan, scheme, plan, and scheme again...

 Now that does sound like a neat idea. At least, once I've managed to purge
myself of this s*dding disease that's infesting my sinuses.. <snuffle>

 **hugs, though of a careful and non-contagious nature**

-- 
Daniel Mitchell = Fenthe Marten = fenthe@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu =
m91djm@ecs.ox.ac.uk = dmitchell@cix.compulink.co.uk = bi furry juggler
Snailmail: 18, High St // Earls Colne // Essex CO6 2PA // ENGLAND
From: flesh@spud.kludge.COM (Flesh)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: hey
Date: 11 Oct 92 22:55:32 GMT
Organization: T.T.L.F., San Francisco CA

anyone reading this in Montana? Either bozeman, or Missoula? 


flesh@spud.kludge.com (Flesh)
Tater Tot Liberation Front BBS, San Francisco CA    +1 415 255 8340
From: rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Change is GOOD!!!
Date: 10 Oct 1992 19:39:50 GMT
Organization: Fraternal Order of Anti-Mathmaticians (FOAM)
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


>>>Who's says that three is a crowd?  However it was probably never had the
>>>opportunity to really enjoy the experience.  I feel that three way interaction
>>>is the ONLY way to go.  What do you think???????
>>
>>Any biblical number is likely to produce good results. Having already
>>tried 3, you should also consider 7 and 40.
>
>Biblical number?  I thought the important part was that it was prime.  This
>rules 40 out, but 41 and 37 are okay.
>--scott

	ARRRGGGHHHH!!!! I thought this was soc.bi not soc.bi.math.  I
dispise prime numbers.  I hate all math.  (But for some reason I am
captivated by statistics, must be because I'm a guy).  
	As for three-way interaction being the only way to go,
it is certainly better than no interaction at all.  But it was ackward
enough, for me, trying two-way interaction....I would probably be
OVER-WHELMED at first, but I'll never know untill I try.  And I'm
always willing to try anything.

					Robert

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
hmmm....maybe I'll have to make a .sig so that it will increase the length
of my posts.  That why I will not keep getting the message that my post
has not been posted because I didn't include more orginal materail then
what I'm replying to.
				rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: two men (was: two women)
Date: 14 Oct 92 16:07:44
Organization: Natural Language Incorporated
	<1bhebuINNjg@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu's message of 14 Oct 1992 15:29:02 GMT


In article <1bhebuINNjg@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
>she went "Oh .. *blush* You know, I've always had this fantasy of two men in
>bed with me ... " *laugh*.  Why is it that I found _that_ much less
>reprehensible than if the genders were reversed?

>Actually, I think I have a fairly good idea why _I_ do, based on my
>perception of the average hetman, and my perception of her ... I suspect the
>average hetman would picture this scenario (him and two persons of the
>opposite gender) as a scenario where the other two persons exist to satisfy
>him sexually (not to mention lesbians, and wouldn't we all just _love_ to
>convert a lesbian? *groan*), whereas in the case of this woman, her motives
>were something along the lines of "Oh, goody, I can please more than one man
>at a time! :)."  

Well, that may be the way your friend feels, but if *I* was in bed with
two men (which is a fantasy of mine...actually, most of my fantasies
involve *more* than two other people...*GRIN*), I would definitely
expect *them* to be pleasing *me*.  Otherwise, why bother?

I object to either of the two scenarios expressed above, both of which
boil down to women pleasing men.  I prefer groups in which *everyone*
pleases *everyone*.  Of course, this can vary over time - I don't expect
everyone to be active at once (reminds me of a post of mine about
activeness in a.s.b - just imagine if everyone was trying to flog
everyone else at once...*grin*).  It can also vary in manner - a person 
who "just lies there" because they're tied down can still be "pleasing."
*smile*.  I just don't believe in altruism, I suppose...I do get
pleasure out of giving it to someone else, but I'd like a little direct
pleasure for myself, too...*grin*...

Muffy
--

Muffy Barkocy                               muffy@mica.berkeley.edu
~Weavers' fingers flying on the loom/patterns shift too fast to be
 discerned/all these years of thinking/ended up like this/in front
 of all this beauty/understanding nothing~ - Bruce Cockburn
From: idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk (the Crisco Kid)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Edinburgh Muffin Pops up in Bay Area
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:43:52 GMT
Organization: Eris's Restaurant

In article <2ad078bb@ThreeL.co.uk> adc@threel.co.uk (Alan "D." Culloch) writes:
>*pop!*  ...another muffin appears.

Alan! At *last*!  YAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY!!!!! <smooch> <hug> <lick>

>Hello everyone.  I've been lurking here for quite a while, but since I'm
>about to temporarily leave Edinburgh and pop up in the Bay Area I
>thought I'd stick my head above the parapet to see if anyone
>wanted to meet up while I was over there.

Our (temporary) loss, their (temporary) gain...

>If so, please e-mail to  adc@threeL.co.uk  (my newsfeed is erratic at
>present).  I'll be around Santa Clara/San Jose 9-18 October.

Oh, you jammy creature! is this work or pleasure?

>P.S., for those who were at Dave Berry's Edinburgh party, I was the one
>with the longish dark hair, pink dungarees and a vague, happy look...

And the cute smile and... and... and.... oh damn, I gotta go change...

				Kay
-- 
6'2", dark short hair, blue eyes, bisexual and horny as ....
Kay Dekker, Dept of Industrial Design, Coventry University, Coventry UK
37 Old Winnings Road, Keresley Village, Coventry   |B0 f t+ g++ k++! s+ e r p!
Phone: +44 203 838668 (work) +44 203 337865 (home) |Deflowerer-of-innocents
From: fenthe@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: out (on the net)
Date: 16 Oct 92 12:52:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: drycas.1992Oct16.175242.2288
Organization: Carnegie Mellon Computer Club

In article <1992Oct15.200231.8004@leland.Stanford.EDU>, mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:
> Mike, considering declaring fluffy-war on Fenthe, but feeling this may
> be rash :-)

 Rash? Eek! Surely not!

 I'd *hate* to think of anyone being allergic to fluffiness.. 

 <sfx: listens to voice from offstage> Oh. That sort of rash. Feh.. and there I
was looking forward to getting to rub soothing-type lotion on Mike, too.. <grin>

 **hugs,snuggles, and generally warm'n'cuddly'n'fluffy things**
-- 
Daniel Mitchell = Fenthe Marten = fenthe@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu =
m91djm@ecs.ox.ac.uk = dmitchell@cix.compulink.co.uk = bi furry juggler
Snailmail: 18, High St // Earls Colne // Essex CO6 2PA // ENGLAND
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: borah@cs.cornell.edu (Vicki Borah)
Subject: Re: National Coming Out Day
Summary: me too
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:42:53 GMT

I don't usually post, but it is, of course, a good day for
demuffining, so here I am. Happy National Coming Out Day from yet
another bisexual queer cuddly person.
(Fenthe/Daniel, do I get a hug now?)
--Vicki
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: jcarroll@bach.udel.edu (Royal J Carroll)
Subject: Re: Yet Another Demuffining(sp?)
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:57:39 GMT

(With all of these demuffinings, it's a good thing I didn't get a chance
to eat breakfast or lunch before coming to work! :-) )

In article <1b37ciINNdr0@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau) demuffins.

Welcome.  Glad to hear that everyone helped.  (Kinda renews faith in all
things soc.bi.  :-) )

**HUGS**

-James


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Don't damn me when I speak a piece of my mind,
'Cause silence isn't golden when I'm holding it inside.
-Axl Rose, "Don't Damn Me"-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=jcarroll@brahms.udel.edu-
From: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Teensy Weensy Virginities
Date: 16 Oct 92 08:56:07 GMT
Reply-To: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Organization: Do they make a washing powder called Caliban Automatic?

In article <1992Oct15.161356.24170@dsg.cs.tcd.ie> cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
>In <1992Oct15.121237.7019@micor.ocunix.on.ca> grinch@micor.ocunix.on.ca
>(Dave Ferguson) writes:
>>Of course, it's still kind of difficult for a man to be anal passive with a
>>female partner, so I guess I *was* distinguishing for that one...
>
>Huh? Have you never heard of strap-on dildos?

Damn, beat me to it.

Actually, it struck me recently that most heterosexuals must get
considerably less fun out of sex than we do.  Few straight men would
dare have their partners strap on dildos for fear they might enjoy it. 
Sex with the other sex can be much more fun when you're coming from a
sex-positive background.
  __                                ____
\/ o\ Paul Crowley pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk \  /
/\__/ "I'm the boy without a soul"   \/
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Subject: Re: public reactions
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 09:55:55 GMT

In <1bcuvcINN7dh@agate.berkeley.edu> jcripe@garnet.berkeley.edu
(Janice E. Cripe) writes:
>[interesting story about wearing a "nobody knows I'm bisexual t-shirt"]

I remember on soc.motss ages ago somebody (FWA?) said he gets
surprisingly little verbal disapproval (but gets some unpleasant looks)
when wearing a queer t-shirt (especialy a blunt one like "I'm a
faggot"). He reasoned this was because somebody is hardly likely to
call you a queer if you happen to be wearing a t-shirt which asserted
this fact. (If somebody did then a great come-back line would be
<surprised> "Oh! So you can read!")


Ciaran.
-- 
Ciaran McHale                                                             ----
Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.       \bi/
Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-772204 email: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie \/
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: tomwhite@well.sf.ca.us (Tom White)
Subject: Re: Other Side of the Closet (Re: Spouses of bi's: anybody out there?)
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 00:07:35 GMT


Does anyone have any experience coming out about being bi in a gay or
lesbian monogamous relationship, from either (bi/homosexual) perspective?
From: gtoal@ibmpcug.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Top 25 News Submitters by User by number of articles for the last 2 weeks
Date: 16 Oct 92 21:14:29 GMT
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.

In article <BvvnrC.AHG@uunet.uu.net> newsstats@uunet.UU.NET writes:
:   6   170     356.1  0.1%   ecsd@tfs.COM  (Eric C. S. Dynamic)
:			      54% rec.org.mensa
:			      19% rec.nude
:			      10% alt.astrology
:			      5% alt.polyamory

I wondered why it was so peaceful here.  He's found other
people to harass.  Interesting choice of groups...

G
--
From: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: bisexual tricks?
Followup-To: soc.bi
Date: 16 Oct 92 19:16:42
Organization: Natural Language Incorporated
	<1992Oct16.122733.6050@ultb.isc.rit.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: kdc5072@ultb.isc.rit.edu's message of 16 Oct 92 12:27:33 GMT

In article <1992Oct16.122733.6050@ultb.isc.rit.edu> kdc5072@ultb.isc.rit.edu (K.D. Colagio) writes:
>In article <MUFFY.92Oct14100038@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
>->
>->For my birthday, my SO gave me (among other things) a book called
>->"TR!CKS" subtitled "More Than 125 Ways To Make Good Sex Better" by Jay
>->Wiseman. 
>Well, we're waiting for some examples of what are in there.....

Okay, well...here are a couple:

86. Hair Heaven (they all have slightly silly titles)

  If you have long hair, you can use it to whip your lover.  Your hair
can feel wonderfully sensuous on their chest, back, and other body
areas.  One caution: Keep clear of their face.  A lock of your hair
across their eyes can, to say the least, spoil the mood.  Swing your
hair back and forth, sideways, and in other directions. (Don't hurt your
neck.)  If it's long enough, hold it in your hand and use it.  Women who
have long hair can often combine this trick well with her-on-top
intercourse.

79. Hot Sex

  Temperature play, in various forms, is a favorite oral sex trick.  One
of the simplest, yet absolutely most effective, variants on this is to
simply keep a cup of hot liquid by the bed.  This can be coffee, tea, or
plain hot water.  One of my most informed sources of information
regarding oral sex said that, of all her different methods, this was the
simplest, easiest to control, and evoked the most response.

*smile*

Muffy
--

Muffy Barkocy                               muffy@mica.berkeley.edu
~Weavers' fingers flying on the loom/patterns shift too fast to be
 discerned/all these years of thinking/ended up like this/in front
 of all this beauty/understanding nothing~ - Bruce Cockburn
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Subject: Re: Addtion to Smurf/Bear codes? (Was Re: I am not a bisexual!!!!)
Organization: insert anything here
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 14:18:49 GMT

In article <5377@rosie.NeXT.COM> ngervae@next.com (Nik Gervae) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.205406.20186@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>  
>q1hl@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Nameless CS Student) writes:
>> In article <1992Oct6.233305.13530@leland.Stanford.EDU>  
>mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:

>> >Mike Lloyd, B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k+ s m- e?
>> Could somebody please post the Bear Codes (tm) again?  I've lost
>> mine, and can't remember what any of that stuff means.

	I flatly refuse to post them, for the simple reason that
every time I have (or someone else has without permission) a
dedicated group of people send me hate mail asking why I "have to
flood the net with all this bear shit".  If you (or someone)
sends me e-mail I'll be happy to forward a copy.

>I've been wondering whether or not there ought to be a code for piercings.
>Maybe just ears for Smurfs, and anywhere for Bears (the Bears I've known,
>anyway... :-). A possible example is below in my .sig...it could get real
>complex if we go crazy with it. Just to explain the tail end of my S2/8:

	At this point there I have no intent to make another revision.
1.9 is possibly the last one.

BBC
From: dwells@lonestar.utsa.edu (Darren . Wells)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Yet Another Demuffining(sp?)
Date: 11 Oct 92 15:14:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: ringer.1992Oct11.151415.24335
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio

>In article <1b37ciINNdr0@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert
Charles Lebeau) writes:
>
>Well some people might be getting sick of demuffinings

Never!  Welcome to the group!

*pounce*
*lick*

The more, the merrier.  :)

>  Hugs (in the tradition of soc.bi),
>
>     Robert
Darren

(Sorry to post twice, but my name didn't show up the first time . . . )
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: nsn@ee.mu.OZ.AU (Nick Nicholas)
Subject: Re: I am not a bisexual!!!! 
Organization: Electronic and Electrical Engineering - University of Melbourne 
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 13:13:10 GMT

h431@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Sults) writes:
[Oh, Iseult. Eek. Ah well, with my 4'', I'm not going to *try* and compete
with her strap-on :) ]

>>I am actually just a sexual, no sillies ... not asexual but a Sexual.  I am
>>not actually attracted to any gender, 
>I've heard other folks say the same thing.
It's, er, tru-*ish* (one doesn't fall in love with genders, but with people)...
but not necessarily *better*. If one is acutely aware of the femininity or
masculinity of one's lover (however you construe them constructs), it doesn't
make you "hung-up" on gender; it just means you have a different view of
things. Iseult, in this, as in not a few other things, has a different view
to me. Well, as long as she's happy...

>>or any person.  
>But Iseult, what exactly does this mean?  I'm confused?

(I know Karina is going to *murder* me next Thursday having seen this, however
many chocolates I buy her to placate her; but...)

Of course you're confused, dear heart. You're still bisexual :)

mwahahaha

Iseult *seems* to be divorcing sexual feeling, period, from the personhood
of her partner. It's just a tickle in the groin, right? (Didn't Ezra Pound
say something about those poets who rued the fact that the stimulus of
three inguinal nerves couldn't buy them nirvana?) Well, again, not the
cup of tea of *this* double-virgin, but again, world-view is what you make
of it, and what gets you through the day. It's for Iseult to know what she's
talking about. It's for you to decide for yourself what you feel. I know,
truism your truism.

Nick, about to embark on a posting spree.

---				
Nick Nicholas: [s]h[r]ug-osexual.  Greek, short, greasy, romantic, and as
B1 f+ t- w s-? e- r-- dr+(+)	   bi as he wants to be. [ObPink&Blues]
nsn@munagin.ee.mu.oz.au (IRC: nicxjo).  Likes Cavafy, Mahler, and cashews.
From: jrk@sys.uea.ac.uk (Richard Kennaway)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Kilroy
Keywords: Kilroy woz ere
Date: 14 Oct 92 10:08:05 GMT
Organization: UEA School of Information Systems, Norwich, UK.

In <26853@castle.ed.ac.uk> sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing) writes:

>And from what folk said about the Geraldo episode, I would say this was
>probably more successful if anything because the arguments put were all
>straight forward and not over-intellectualised; I really can't see it
>going over the audience's head.  And I would be very interested to see
>what effect it has on the amount of new people contacting support groups
>and so forth in the UK. 

Does anyone know what the viewing figures are for Kilroy?  9:05 on Tuesday
morning isn't exactly peak time.

--
Richard Kennaway     SYS, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.
Internet:  jrk@sys.uea.ac.uk               uucp:  ...mcsun!ukc!uea-sys!jrk

Wiry naked anarch, why darken crania?
From: mlloyd@castle.ed.ac.uk (M Lloyd)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: National Coming Out Day
Date: 12 Oct 92 04:12:51 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

jcripe@garnet.berkeley.edu (Janice E. Cripe) writes:
>Since today is National Coming Out Day, I thought I'd add
>myself to the long list of people I've seen demuffining
>themselves recently and go ahead and post.

A fine idea, I must say! :-)  Welcome, e-hugs and all that stuff.
It's such a good idea to come out from the cold ...

>I hope that someday I'll actually have something useful
>to post here, but for right now, I just wanted to peek
>out from behind my CRT and thank you folks for some
>interesting and insightful (and sometimes funny) reading.

Hey, y'all's welcome.  As for having useful things to say,
what could be better than "one more person has chosen
expression over suppression"?  You've made my world a
better place, and thanks for that :-)

Mike, who always has room for one more muffin, baked or electronic
-- 
Mike Lloyd                         | B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k(+) s m- e? 
Retro-hippy, music nut, bi and     | "The Trouble with Normal is it
owner of a one-track mind:         |  Always Gets Worse" - Bruce Cockburn
   "thesis .. thesis .. thesis"    |    (-:   F**k Your Gender!  :-)
From: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Teensy Weensy Virginities
Date: 14 Oct 1992 18:32:58 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Oct14.121503.12502@micor.ocunix.on.ca> grinch@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Dave Ferguson) writes:

->it wouldn't be gay virginity, right? 8-).  If you're bi, you're not just
->dealing with gay virginity anymore, and you have that additional virginity
->to lose (or hold on to, as the case may be).

*grin* Or, actually, my favorite, 
to give away ...

I mean, I dunno ... I much prefer the thought of giving my virginity (or
bits and pieces of it) to someone rather than losing it to them ... 

->>Thanks, Dave.  It's quite a handsome tidbit, too.
->No, thank *you*, Coy Roy, for not letting that tidbit slip by uncorrected.
->c(-8 

*grin* Anytime ...

-roy, who never lets any cute tidbits slip by un{corrected,otherthings}
-- 
Roy S. Rapoport          rsr@soda.berkeley.edu            bdsm@ocf.berkeley.edu
                   The test results came back today ... 
                           I'm queer-positive ... 
DISCLAIMER:  "I meant every word of it ... but nobody else did."
From: zen@death.corp.sun.com (d)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: My first Triangle
Date: 8 Oct 92 09:40:32 GMT
	<ZEN.92Oct6233259@death.corp.sun.com> <1avri7INN4q0@agate.berkeley.edu>
	<1992Oct8.120414.28830@news.acns.nwu.edu>
	<MUFFY.92Oct8062927@remarque.berkeley.edu>
Followup-To: soc.bi
Organization: savage hackers
NNTP-Posting-Host: death.corp.sun.com
In-reply-to: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu's message of 8 Oct 92 06:29:27


In article <MUFFY.92Oct8062927@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
> >  If you meet a Queer on the road, fuck em!
> I like your
> restatement...sounds like fun...more than that, it's the first "fuck
> <x>" slogan-type-thing that I'd say "sure!" to...*GRIN*.

  Remind me to leap out onto the road the next time you drive by...

 -- d
From: jcripe@garnet.berkeley.edu (Janice E. Cripe)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Completely Missed a Slug
Date: 17 Oct 1992 02:40:51 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu

In article <1bna5mINN9lv@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> ttk@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (the troglodyte killer) writes:
> 
>     'Twas wondering when I'd run into a fellow slug..  There're 
>enough pink triangle pins here to make one feel out-of-place >not< 
>wearing one.  ;-)
> 

Well, here's a slug alum!  Cowell class of 89.  Good to see
Santa Cruz is still a nice place to be (at least in terms of
being out).

Well, just thought I'd say, "Hi."

- Janice Cripe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Semper ubi sub ubi - my graduation quote  :)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~