HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Subject:      Third question to the new elected IFCSS president
Reply-To: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 08:59:00 EDT

New question to the new elected IFCSS President: Which committee is in charge
for the lobby work? The nominee of communication committee was wonder around
about lobby a few months ago. Zhao haiqing should be in charge for lobby. D.Zhou
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: George Zhu <zhu@RISKY.ECS.UMASS.EDU>
Subject:      Re:  IFCSS: BRIEF REPORT ON IMMIGRATION AND MFN BILLS
Reply-To: George Zhu <zhu@RISKY.ECS.UMASS.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 01:06:05 -0400
Comments: To: china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

Subject:  IFCSS: BRIEF REPORT ON IMMIGRATION AND MFN BILLS

>
>
>        BRIEF REPORT ON IMMIGRATION AND MFN BILLS
>
>
>*****************************************************************
>
>
>        To:    Chinese Students and Scholars Nationwide
>
>
>        From:  Haiching Zhao, President of IFCSS
                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Is Zhao Haiching still the President of IFCSS?  I thought he was not
re-elected. :-)

George
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Subject:      Support former IFCSS President Zhao haiqing's hard lobby work!
Reply-To: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Fri, 31 Jul 1992 02:08:00 EDT

All netters, to win the lobby is the top task, for ourself and the Human right
of china. Former IFCSS President who leading the lobby for 3 years, need support
. please send your donation to: CCSA/immigration Fund,P.O.box 65307, DC20035-53
7, D.ZHOU, FL
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: Spratly Islands (War coming over oil?)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 30 Jul 92 15:22:46 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.195144.14759@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> inxs@phoenix.austin.ibm.com writes:
>In article <14op1jINN8v3@agate.berkeley.edu> tedrick@whistle.Berkeley.EDU (Tom Tedrick) writes:
>>Evidently tensions are heating up over the oil fields under
>>the Spratly islands. If it comes down to war (possibly
>>involving China, Vietnam, the Philippines, and/or Japan),
>>who do you think will win? What are the comparative strengths
>>of the naval forces of the various countries? What about
>>the role of air power? Might China threaten a land invasion
>>of Vietnam in order to get their way in the Spratlys?
>
>	It will be Vietnam, of course; as long as some big friends  
>	are willing to supply arms.  Far-Eastern Bowl championship 
>	aside, let's stop the Chinese government from throwing its 
>	big, fat, ugly communist a#% around.  (It has already 
>	grabbed some islands from VN a years back).  China has plenty
> 	of oil on its vast land; its only problem is the backward 
>	thinking, repressive government it has in place right now.	
>	
>
>	Don

	
	I doubt China wants to fight another conflict.  However, the
backward repressive government of China don't usually throw its big fat
urgly ass around only because some big friends supplying arms, it also
does that when the small narrow dry Vietnamese Communist pussy pissed
it off.  On the other hand, Vietnam at the moment don't have a big
Soviet brother providing money and arms.  No wonder world's "third
largest military power" normalized its relationship with BeiJing 
last year.  


Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: XIAOJIAN@CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU
Subject:      Lobby Activities in UA (forward as requested)
Reply-To: XIAOJIAN@CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 01:54:00 MST
Comments: To: china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

   *******************************************************************

                       ACTION! ACTION!! ACTION!!!

   *******************************************************************

         As we all know, the lobbying campaign for the CSS Protection
   Bill has come to the most crucial moment. To us, this is an
   once-in-a-life-time opportunity. If we do not take our actions NOW,
   then WHEN? If WE don't stand up to defend our right, then WHO will?
   Please, for our survival, for our right, and more importantly, for
   the cause of democracy, fellow Chinese students and scholars,
   roll up our sleeves and get ourselves moving: call, fax and donate.
   Believe it or not, it does help and it does make a difference.

                                  CSSA, University of Arizona

   *******************************************************************

                                News Report

   *******************************************************************
   A meeting was called this weekend (July 25) for the purpose of
   discussing and coordinating the lobbying campaign among CSS at
   the University of Arizona. The meeting called for our immediate
   action and participation in the lobbying effort by calling,
   faxing and donating. $442.00 was donated at the meeting and more
   donations are certainly needed. For those who would like to donate,
   please contact
                 Mr. Xiaogang Gao
                 Department of Hydrology
                 621-8787   (Office)
                 623-3797   (Home)
                 E-mail: GAO@HWR.ARIZONA.EDU
   The donation will be well supervised and sent to IFCSS-Immigration
   Fund established by IFCSS HQ for the lobbying effort.

                                  CSSA, University of Arizona

   ******************************************************************
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: JDW5139@TAMXRD.TAMU.EDU (J. DON WANG JDWANG@TAMCHEM.BITNET)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
Subject: RE: Vice President of Oregon State U. Lobbying for Chinese
              Immigration
Date: 26 Jul 92 18:37:48 GMT
Reply-To: "J. DON WANG JDWANG@TAMCHEM.BITNET" <JDW5139@TAMXRD.TAMU.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Comments: To: luh@NAS.NASA.GOV, CHINA-NT@uga.cc.uga.edu

>From:         "Raymond C. Luh" <luh@NAS.NASA.GOV>

>Is Vice President Xu speaking for the President of OSU? :-)

>Ray

Maybe I am too nonplitical to see the point, but what importance is it of who
lobbies and what title does he/she uses? We have seen too much arguement over
who is the president and who is the past president when focus should be placed
right on the issue--the lobbying effort itself. Stop dog fight on the plitics
of lobbying, put that energy in lobbying. Although I do wish the lobbying fund
account difference be resolved quietly and then the resolution made public to
us QUICKLY.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: D61O@br2.hrz.th-darmstadt.de (One of 100 millions ZHANGs)
Subject: Re: Another way to calculate economic strength
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 20:14:51 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20
Organization: Technical University Darmstadt, Germany

In <1992Jul21.235553.29698@ulowell.ulowell.edu> cshi@cs.ulowell.edu writes:

< Example:
<   Germany had strongest economy in Europe, when Germany asked other EEC
< nations to recognized newly coatia, etc, reject. Germany raise her 
< interest rate.

Nonsense!

It was the lending rate (Lombardsatz) that was raised by the German 
Federal Bank. It is not necessarily connected to normal bank rates, if
you know the differences between the lending rate and interests for
loans or savings. The bank interests here have not changed since then.
To understand this you must know something about the german economy in
recent years.

On the other hand, the German Federal Bank is politically an independent
organization, what was the reason a lot german politicians recently have
blamed it because its money-policy.


======================================================================
J.Z.
d61o@br2.hrz.th-darmstadt.de
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Subject:      A suggestion to president and new elected president
Reply-To: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Sun, 26 Jul 1992 08:17:00 EDT

IFCSS president and new elected president, would you please discuss
together how to form a united lobby team to push the lobby work effectively.
New elected president should not ignore the lobby role of ZHao and Huang. D.Zhou
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: xiaofei@acsu.buffalo.edu (XiaoFei Wang)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
Subject: Re:  IFCSS: BRIEF REPORT ON IMMIGRATION AND MFN BILLS
Date: 22 Jul 92 13:27:36 GMT
Organization: Physics Dept, State U of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260

/* From the keyboard of George Zhu <zhu@RISKY.ECS.UMASS.EDU> */:
:>
:>        From:  Haiching Zhao, President of IFCSS
:                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:
:Is Zhao Haiching still the President of IFCSS?  I thought he was not
:re-elected. :-)

The printed letter paper with above letter head have not used up. 
I appreciate Haiching's concern for environment. 

I hope this clears up the confusion you have. 

-- 
xiaofei@acsu.buffalo.edu | Subscribe Chinese Poem Exchange and Discussion List 
mail LISTSERV@UBVM.BITNET with "SUB CHPOEM-L 1st LastName" in the MESSAGE BODY
InterNet Address: UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU | Posting in UUENCODED GB and BIG5
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: jch@netcom.com (Jack Hwang)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
Subject: Re: We support Taiwan Independence
Date: 21 Jul 92 17:16:36 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <76166@ut-emx.uucp> joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang) writes:
>In article <l6eav1INNkfo@pollux.usc.edu> mcyang@pollux.usc.edu (Bien-Chao Iunn) writes:
>
>>    The will of the people of the country
>>    should be the ultimate guideline.  
>
>Right now the will of the people on Taiwan seems to be "Taiwan is a
>part of China but not PRC."  You don't seem to be accepting that too
>well.

Sorry, you are wrong.  The will of people in Taiwan is "Taiwan is as it
is, don't make any radical political changes in the near future."  You
just misinterprete it.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: g_wuml@mv3800.engr.scarolina.edu
Subject: Re: We support TI
Reply-To: g_wuml@mv3800.engr.scarolina.edu
Organization: University Of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 02:28:43 GMT

In article <w1dm7zl.jch@netcom.com> jch@netcom.com (Jack Hwang)
>In article <76166@ut-emx.uucp> joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang) writes:
>>In article <l6eav1INNkfo@pollux.usc.edu> mcyang@pollux.usc.edu (Bien-Chao Iunn) writes:
>>
>>>    The will of the people of the country
>>>    should be the ultimate guideline.  
>>
>>Right now the will of the people on Taiwan seems to be "Taiwan is a
>>part of China but not PRC."  You don't seem to be accepting that too
>>well.
>
>Sorry, you are wrong.  The will of people in Taiwan is "Taiwan is as it
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>is, don't make any radical political changes in the near future."  You
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>just misinterprete it.

I totally agree with you about this statement.  Even though I am a 
pro-unification'er, I don't think "Now" is right time to be unified. 
On the other hand, some radical TI'ers don't understand people's will
well.

C. Huang

Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: George Zhu <zhu@RISKY.ECS.UMASS.EDU>
Subject:      RE: Pull it together; Don't tear it apart!
Reply-To: George Zhu <zhu@RISKY.ECS.UMASS.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:32:56 -0400
Comments: To: JDW5139@tamxrd.tamu.edu, china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

>Is there a typo? I believe you meant that Zhao's leadership could NOT be
>replaced without damaging the lobby effort.
>
>As an outsider, I suggest that the IFCSS headquarter place Mr. Zhao Haiqing in
>charge of the lobbying effort by creating a special title for him. I can think
>of two or three: Spokesperson for IFCSS, Special Liaison, National Coordinator
>for Congressional Lobby Efforts.

Or may I suggest that Dr. Zhao Haiching be appointed as "Co-President of
the IFCSS", or "Honorary President of IFCSS".

George
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: txt15@po.CWRU.Edu (Tao Tao)
Subject: Re: Immigration Bill
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 01:30:52 GMT


I don't think any chinese students from mainland would be victimized by this
bill.  This in a way greatly advanced the tempo for CSS's currently in queue
waiting for the immigration visa in getting them.  The take-away, is gradual
at most, 500 quota/each year.  So for those came here after 90/4/11 will be
benificiaries too.

I think there should be some education work on this part, explain to the new
comers that they are indeed beneficiaries instead of victims.

Tao
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Subject:      a question to the new elected president of IFCSS
Reply-To: UFDZ%UFPINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Sat, 25 Jul 1992 12:47:00 EDT

Nothing is wrong with the IFCSS president Zhao Haiqing continue work before
August 1, the formal transation date. a question to the new elected president:
"can you set down with Zhao to make the transation easier? why not?" D. Zhou
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: Zhanguo Duan <zgd@CSD4.CSD.UWM.EDU>
Subject:      Lobby Strategy
Reply-To: Zhanguo Duan <zgd@CSD4.CSD.UWM.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Sun, 26 Jul 1992 01:20:14 CDT
Comments: To: china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

Hi netters:

Now we are engaged in the lobby of S1216, to my understanding, this phase
of lobby is the most important phase of all.

Is it right that we should mobilized as many as possible of Chinese students
to join in letter/fax/telephone lobby champaign targeting the 13 House
Rules Committee members?  Or is it too technical for many Chinese students
to join in?

I have just found out that there are a lot of universities where no action has
been taken, and most of Chinese students there know nothing about what is
happening, should we contact them to join us as well?

According those who had participated the lobby of the J-1 waiver bill in late
1989, the fax machines and telephone lines of congressmen and senators were
jamed by Chinese students' messages, they might overdone it, but compare to what
they had done this lobby is too weak.

In my opinion, we should mobilize far more people that we have now, but I am
not very sure about this, since the information I have is very limited, I don't
want to make negative contribution.  Before I make calls and send mails to other
schools, I wish I can hear your opinions on this strategy, especially that from
those who know the situation better than me.

Please share your opinions with us.

Thank you.


Zhanguo Duan

University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: Jinghong Li <jli@AMSC01.ENGR.UDAYTON.EDU>
Subject:      Re:  Amendment to IFCSS Council Resolution CR4004
Reply-To: Jinghong Li <jli@AMSC01.ENGR.UDAYTON.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 16:31:57 EDT
Comments: cc: jli@amsc01.BITNET

Dear china-net management committee,
Dear whomever involved,

Early today, there were mails came from lix and David Yuan respectively
which in my view have nothing to do with this china-net, and have
probably violated china-net rules.  In my opinion, such mails attacking
a person's character based on their private mail exchanges should not
be encouraged on china-net.  Like the CNMC has done in the past, I
beleive proper warnings should be issued, and any repeated actions
should be punished accordingly.

Thank you for your attention.

Jinghong Li

U of Dayton.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: David Yuan <yuan@TERI.BIO.UCI.EDU>
Subject:      Re:  publized
Reply-To: David Yuan <yuan@TERI.BIO.UCI.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 12:59:54 PDT
Comments: To: CHINA-NT@uga.cc.uga.edu, HWANGK@VTCC1.BITNET

Sorry for the typo, but this is one of the treatment tactics psychologists
used to let the other side feel a little positive when knowing the truth.
It works on you, I can tell. But you still have to face the reality, do you?

David Yuan
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: D-P Deng <deng@BNLUX1.BNL.GOV>
Subject:      Rules
Reply-To: D-P Deng <deng@BNLUX1.BNL.GOV>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 20:08:30 EDT
Comments: To: china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

Anyone cares to explain what the CLOSED (OPEN) rules are ?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: GSBS006%UTSPH.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Subject:      Help wanted!
Reply-To: GSBS006%UTSPH.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:31:00 CST

Hi Everybody,

        I accidently lost the package distributed by Dr. Zhao, Haiching.
Anybody can send me one? Since I am editing and distributing our local
newsletter covering our current lobby effort, your help will be very
much appreciated. Thank you again for your attention and support.

Felix Jin
GSBS006
Xref: sparky talk.politics.china:251 soc.culture.taiwan:11113
From: joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china,soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Re: be honest and you might get some respect
Date: 22 Jul 92 05:24:10 GMT
Followup-To: talk.politics.china
Organization: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas @ Austin

In article <l6pakdINNbm1@pollux.usc.edu> mcyang@pollux.usc.edu (Bien-Chao Iunn) writes:
>In article <76216@ut-emx.uucp>, joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang) writes...
>-- "Big China" has historically meant "prosperous and happy China".
>
>Come on !  Yourself don't even believe in this.

I don't????  Interesting that you know what I believe in better than I
do.  Hmmmmmm.........

So tell me, what do I think about MSDOS versus UNIX?  I thought I
liked UNIX better than MSDOS, but seeing as you seem to be an expert
about what I believe, perhaps I should ask you just to make sure.

>You just told us that once Taiwan offcializes her independence status,
>every provience of China will try to seek for their own independence.

As I said before.  If an individual province secedes, then that
province individually will always be better off.  The problem is that
if all the provinces secede, then they all will be worse off.

If you don't quite understand this point, ask yourself why are we
forced to pay taxes.  After all, shouldn't contributions to a good
government be completely voluntary?  If not, why not?




Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: zzuo@iastate.edu (Zhiqi Zuo)
Subject: ? 
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 22:36:13 GMT

In article <1992Jul26.200211.2482@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> hengyi@ec.ecn.purdue.edu (Heng-Yi Chao) writes:
>...

>Sorry.
>Is this the killer who should be dead for a million times on mainland China ?
>Please do not talk about "immigration" and admire him simmultaneously.
>Don't you think it's funny ?
>
>When you guys who are so enthusiastic for the immigration,
>is there anyone thinking about Chinese on mainland ?

They are going to be Americans anyway.

>Also, the departed spirits under the tanks on Taienmoon Square ?
>It is your freedom to choose your future,
>but please do it SILENTLY !
>It is not such a GREAT task that you can be PROUD of ! sigh!

The immdiate goal for them is no more related to anything else but
their own future. That's why their calls for the well beings of
chinese people sound like quite absurd, when mixed with GREAT 
personal gains which they would like to obtain with any means.

Just can't help saying so, let's see how far they can go.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: Zhang Yun Fei <zhang@BUAST7.BU.EDU>
Subject:      Re:  IFCSS: BRIEF REPORT ON IMMIGRATION AND MFN BILLS
Reply-To: Zhang Yun Fei <zhang@BUAST7.BU.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 12:09:42 -0400
Comments: To: CHINA-NT@uga.cc.uga.edu

George -

I notice Geng Xiao and He Boping are still calling themselves president-elect
and vise president-elect. Hope there is no confusion this time. (^_^)

Yun Fei Zhang

>From:         George Zhu <zhu@RISKY.ECS.UMASS.EDU>
>Subject:      Re:  IFCSS: BRIEF REPORT ON IMMIGRATION AND MFN BILLS
>>        BRIEF REPORT ON IMMIGRATION AND MFN BILLS
>>*****************************************************************
>>        To:    Chinese Students and Scholars Nationwide
>>        From:  Haiching Zhao, President of IFCSS
>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Is Zhao Haiching still the President of IFCSS?  I thought he was not
>re-elected. :-)
>
>George
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: "Raymond C. Luh" <luh@NAS.NASA.GOV>
Subject:      Re:  Chinese Stamp Said to Show Tiananmen Massacre Date
Reply-To: "Raymond C. Luh" <luh@NAS.NASA.GOV>
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:10:46 -0700
Comments: To: china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

>    The last time an unwelcome political message appeared on a Chinese stamp
>was during the Culture Revolution.  That stamp was quickly withdrawn, and the
>few copies that made it into the public's hands sell today at stamp auctions
>for thousands of dollars.

The stamp in question is a 1968 Cultural Revolution Commemorative Issue.
The issue was given the name "Whole Country is Red" and is supposed to
show all of China including Taiwan in red.  However, Taiwan is "mistakenly"
shown in yellow with only a red outline for the island province.  The
latest catalogue (Yang's Postage Stamp Catalogue of the PRC, 1993) has
the stamp listed at US$4,500 for mint and US$2,000 for used.

There is another set of 2 CRCI stamps that command a much higher price
than the above.  Called "Great Victory of Cultural Revolution," this
set was printed but was never OFFICIALLY issued.  Some of them did however
fall into the hands of collectors and are now available for a good price.
The lower priced of the two is going for US$5,000 while the other one, which
has the same problem of not covering Taiwan in red, has a price tag of
US$40,000.  This may be the single most expensive set of stamps ever printed
under the PRC to date.


Ray
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Raymond C. Luh        |  So many deeds cry out to be done always urgently.  |
|  (415)-604-4494        |  The world rolls on.  Time presses.                 |
|  luh@ame.nas.nasa.gov  |  Seize the day.  Seize the hour.   --  Mao Zedong   |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
From: JDW5139@TAMXRD.TAMU.EDU
Subject:      RE: Pull it together; Don't tear it apart!
Reply-To: JDW5139@TAMXRD.TAMU.EDU
Organization: Indiana University
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 13:21:37 -0500
Comments: To: xpeng@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, CHINA-NT@uga.cc.uga.edu

>From:         xpeng@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
>Subject:      Pull it together; Don't tear it apart!

>The protection bill does not come out overnight.  It come out of the CCSA's
>more than one year of consistent hard working.  Anyone, who real want to see
>this bill pass, can imagine that AT THIS CRUCIAL TIME DR. ZHAO HAIQING's
>LEADERSHIP ON THIS MATTER COULD BE REPLACED WITHOUT DRAMATICALLY DAMAGE THE
>ON GOING LOBBY EFFORT.  Many people may not like Zhao HaiQing.  If you believe
>that the protection bill is for the interest of Chinese Students and Scholars
>as a whole it is a wise judgement to keep Zhao HaiQing's leadership on this
>coordinated lobby effort.

Is there a typo? I believe you meant that Zhao's leadership could NOT be
replaced without damaging the lobby effort.

As an outsider, I suggest that the IFCSS headquarter place Mr. Zhao Haiqing in
charge of the lobbying effort by creating a special title for him. I can think
of two or three: Spokesperson for IFCSS, Special Liaison, National Coordinator
for Congressional Lobby Efforts. I would also like to see Dr. Zhao Haiqing
publically express willingness to work on lobbying with and under the newly
elected IFCSS leadership.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china