HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: waal@cwi.nl (Peter de Waal)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Until the End of the World (When?)
Date: 28 Jan 93 11:59:28 GMT
Organization: CWI

Well, I have read all these reviews about "Until the End of the World"
by Wim Wenders. I even bought the soundtrack more than a year ago, but
I am still waiting for the release of this movie. Can anybody tell me
whether this film was ever released in Europe (and especially in The
Netherlands)?

Please respond by email, as I don't read this newsgroup regularly.

--- Peter de Waal, CWI, Amsterdam <waal@cwi.nl> --- 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: karim@bnrmtl.bnr.ca (Karim Younes)
Subject: Re: Help: What Was It Called?
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Montreal, Canada.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 18:25:13 GMT

In <3220103@hpcc01.corp.hp.com> shkelnik@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Leslie Shkolnik) writes:

>Does anyone know the name of the following movie?  I think it was from England,
>although I'm not sure.  The movie was in English though.  It was about some
>natural constant getting changed, I think through an experiment, and everyone
>who was in the process of dying at the time are the only ones left?  Something
>like that.  As you can tell, I don't remember all that much except that it was
>an interesting movie.
>
>Thanks for any help you can give me.
>

I believe it was called "The Quiet Earth". I remember being very
depressed after seeing it...

-- 
Karim "Kouki" Younes                      Bell-Northern Research
karim@bnr.ca                              Montreal, Canada
From: csroc@cvbnet.prime.com (cvbnet)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: REVIEW: SCENT OF A WOMAN
Date: 27 Jan 93 13:51:17 GMT
Distribution: usa

From article <21732@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>, by jdooley@venus.engr.ucdavis.edu (John Dooley):
> 
> I have big problem with this movie though.  And, that's that it's
> ridiculously sexist.  There's nothing wrong with portraying Pacino's
> character as sexist, but somewhere there should be some effort
> to create a female character that has some substance (to offset
> Pacino's character's behaviour).  
>


Why?????

Inserting an assertive female might seem
to be a PC ish thing to do, but what
purpose would it serve?   There were no
male characters who could really stand up
to Pacino(ok the boy finally tries to stop
the suicide..I won't reveal whether he is sucessful)
but only after being pushed and pushed and pushed)

Pacino pushes around his brother, his inlaws,
his brothers family, every person in the Big Apple,
the establishment in the Military school...I don't
think this movie needs a female with substance(or
another male with substance)...that would be a different movie        
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle)
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 00:26:35 GMT
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.

In article <1k8pnkINNm3g@titan.ucs.umass.edu> a0s5108@titan.ucs.umass.edu (Neal and Mara Priestly) writes:
>In article <1993Jan26.002833.39037@datamark.co.nz> thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle) writes:
>
>>Perhaps some of the cinema workers who read this group should learn
>>something about customer service?
>
>Perhaps you should learn some courtesy.

What you failed to recognise is that the customer doesn't actually
care that it is the newspapers fault that they got it wrong. The name
of the cinema is on top of the ad and they get blamed.

Once the cinema gets it wrong once, the customer might be less
inclined to trust all information they get from the cinema.

You have been writing with the view of the insider. You know what
happens. You know the procedures. You know why things have gone wrong.
The customer at the cinema doesn't know this background information -
they just came to see a movie, right?

Perhaps you should recognise this. Customers are not stupid, they're
merely operating in an environment that they don't know much about.
IMHO, they shouldn't have to know much about it.

>Please notice that, despite the closing crack, I kept my flamethrower
>holstered through the entire performance.

Am I meant to be relieved that you didn't use it or scared that you
might use it? I ask only for information.


-- 
    Thomas Beagle | thomas@datamark.co.nz           Work: 64 4 233 8186
 Technical Writer | thomas@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz     Home: 64 4 499 3832
   Wellington, NZ |   A man without a woman is like tea without sugar.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: guru@camelot.bradley.edu (Jerry Whelan)
Subject: Who from Poltergeist is now dead?
Organization: The Smelly Ditch
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 21:26:30 GMT

	I was BSing with a friend recently and claimed that a lot
of the cast from the original Poltergeist film have died.  But
I didn't really know who, so could someone who knows post a list
of who's dead, what character they played and how/when they died?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
``written by a drunken insane pathological liar''        guru@stasi.bradley.edu
From: hhtra@usho72.hou281.chevron.com (T.M.Haddock)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Looking for SIXPACK
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:13:20 GMT
Organization: Chevron

In article <93025.233630JBK4@psuvm.psu.edu>, JBK4@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
|> I'm looking for the following movies:
|> 
|> 1 a letter-boxed version of AMERICAN GRAFFITI
|> 2 letter-boxed or standard version of SIXPACK
                                        ^^^^^^^^^
 Ugh, why?
From: kim3@husc10.harvard.edu (Jason Y. Kim)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Year Kubrick's _Dr. Strangelove_ was released?
Date: 21 Jan 93 21:57:07 GMT

Help, I've cited this film in a paper but I don't know what year to include
in the bibliography! If you know, please e-mail me quick.

Thanks,
-- 


                              ~  Jason Y. Kim  ~
                                     ~=@=~
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mcbride@owlnet.rice.edu (Douglas Foster McBride)
Subject: Evil Dead III release date?
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:03:19 GMT


Anyone know when Evil Dead III is to be released?  I saw a trailer for
it and thought it looked promising.  Hopefully Raimi will keep the
spirit of II (whatever his original intentions for that movie, it was
hilarious) alive.  Response by email is fine.

Thanks,
-- 
 Doug McBride                (mcbride@rice.edu)               (713) 630-8796
 "I don't get it! I've pulled every trick in the book and I'm still losing!!!
  Plucky!!!!"  "Yes, sir?"  "Why am I losing?!"  "Have you considered using
		 breath mints?"  -- Montana Max & Plucky Duck
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: trb@cbnews.cb.att.com (tom.balent)
Subject: Re: Seconds
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 11:20:41 GMT

In article <1jnn4e$qne@agate.berkeley.edu> annie@garnet.berkeley.edu  (Anne Jessop) writes:
>
>
>Ob wierd films:
>
>_Seconds_ (John Frankenheimer, 1966: Rock Hudson, in a film about
>"mistaken identity" which is not a sex comedy with Doris Day and which
>resonates interestingly and touchingly after his death.)
>


Not really mistaken identity - more like changed identity...
From: FA.TJM@forsythe.stanford.edu (Thom McKean)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: buscemi = god
Date: 25 Jan 1993 17:15:13 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

I've come up with something of a new rule for films:

If Steve Buscemi's in it, it's damn good.  What's his story?  What's
his filmography?  So far, here's what I've seen:

Miller's Crossing
Barton Fink
Resevoir Dogs
In the Soup
Mystery Train

All of which I consider to be films of high caliber.  4 chocolate
palm trees each.

I'd also like to push for Buscemi to play Peter Lorre in the
upcoming biopic of his life.

Thom

if you took out all the veins and arteries and capillaries in your
body and laid them end to end, you'd be dead

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell)
Subject: Re: Who from Poltergeist
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:01:12 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <302510d29@ofa123.fidonet.org> Jay.Majer@ofa123.fidonet.org writes:
>JW>       I was BSing with a friend recently and claimed that a lot
>JW> of the cast from the original Poltergeist film have died.  But
>JW> I didn't really know who, so could someone who knows post a list
>JW> of who's dead, what character they played and how/when they died?
>
>Heather O'Rourke, the little girl, died very shortly after POLTERGEIST
>III was completed. (The movie was dedicated to her in the credits)
>Also, the girl who played O'Rourke's older sister in the first film
>either committed suicide or was killed by her boyfriend (I forget
>which). Finally, the old guy who played Kane in the second film died
>before part III was made.
>

What did Heather O'Rourke's cause of death?  Anybody in netland out there
know more about these people?


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mills@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com (Mike Mills)
Subject: Re: Video(tape) A Swindle
Organization: LMSC Santa Cruz
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 22:53:59 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.073519.14795@uhura.neoucom.edu> wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu (William R. Cruce) writes:

>In article <1993Jan20.155822.10438@netnews.noc.drexel.edu> jwimp@mcs.drexel.edu (Jet Wimp) writes:
>>
>>     Another private pet peeve of mine: I think viodetape is one of  our
>>civilization's great current swindles.  It allows people to think they
>>have seen a film when they really haven't seen it.  In fact, watching a
>>film on videotape is like eating an ice cream cone with a cold.  Poeple
>>truly interested in film should get involved in film societies that show
>>films where they belong: on a movie screen.

>The downside is that video is cutting short the time films appear in a
>theater.  And a frightening aside, from what Siskel and Ebert said on
>a recent program, many people voting on the Academy Awards will be seeing
>the films on video -unclear whether this is to refresh their memories
>or whether, for some, it is the only way they will see some films.

>The upside is that video lets people like myself (not residing in NY
>or LA or Seattle and an hour away from decent movie houses) study films
>to an extent never possible before.  But it only whets my appetite
>to see films on the big screen.  To pursue your analogy, if the ice
>cream tastes good when I have a cold it stimulates me to taste it again
>under better conditions.

>And, seeing films on laserdisc is an improvement over videotape though
>still a far cry from the theater.


>-- 
>Unauthorized duplication, etc. may result in civil liability, criminal pro-
>secution, the wrath of the tall man or a bite from Ralph the Wonder Llama.
>     William L.R. (Bill) Cruce       INTERNET: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu 
>   Neurobiology Dept, NE Ohio U Coll of Med, POB 95, Rootstown, OH 44272 
Seeing films on Laser Disks is night over Video tape!
From: roy@prism.gatech.EDU (Roy Mongiovi)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Raising Cain (spoiler?)
Date: 26 Jan 93 18:17:58 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

OK.  I just saw "Raising Cain" (it's just out on home video),
and I'm totally confused.

Supposedly Carter/Cain/et al is the crazy one, but if that's
the case, I don't understand all the events involving the
wife (and others)....

Why does the wife have all those incredible nightmares?

Doesn't she die after Carter dumps her in the lake?  The
cops DO find her body and show it to the old lady doctor,
don't they?  Or was the body someone else (what with the
expression on her face, I wasn't sure who it was).  Yet
later on she's alive and goes to the cops and nobody thinks
anything of it.  I'm pretty sure that wasn't a dream, though.

Does anyone understand what's going on?  Thanks.
							Roy
-- 
Roy J. Mongiovi   Systems Support Specialist        Information Technology
                                                Georgia Institute of Technology
Tough are the souls that tread the knife's edge  Atlanta, Georgia  30332-0715
        J. Tull                                      roy@prism.gatech.edu
From: chapmand@chdasic.sps.mot.com (David Chapman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Where's the director?
Date: 25 Jan 93 22:07:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: caster.9301252207.AA27996
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA04003; Mon, 25 Jan 93 14:06:00 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA11648; Mon, 25 Jan 93 14:05:58 -0800
X-Received: from spsgate.sps.mot.com by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA01400; Mon, 25 Jan 93 17:05:54 -0500
X-Received: by spsgate.sps.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA08220; Mon, 25 Jan 93 15:05:53 MST
X-Received: from emailchd (email.sps.mot.com) by motsps (4.1/SMI-4.0/Email 1.1)
	id AA03687; Mon, 25 Jan 93 15:05:28 MST
X-Received: from caster.suneng by chdasic (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA27799; Mon, 25 Jan 93 15:07:17 MST
X-Received: by caster.suneng (4.1/Sun-Client)
	id AA27996; Mon, 25 Jan 93 15:07:16 MST
X-To: rec.arts.movies.usenet


The Commitments     Alan Parker is a record producer in a scene towards
                     the end of the movie.
From: 910252m@dragon.acadiau.ca (Dwayne MacKinnon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Yet Another Movie Title Wanted
Date: 25 Jan 93 22:41:39 GMT
Organization: Acadia University

rcosby@bcm.tmc.edu (Randy C. Cosby) writes:

>In article <16B5BDD35.M15841@mwvm.mitre.org>, M15841@mwvm.mitre.org writes:
>> Please help me identify this movie.
>>  
>> It starred Whoopie Goldberg and Sam Elliot.  She played a cop; he played a
>> private security guard for a drug kingpin she was trying to capture.  They fell
>> for each other.  Lots of shooting in a mall at the end.
>>  
>> Thanks in advance!!
>>  
>> Mary Brick

Mary,
     The name you're looking for is "Fatal Beauty".

DMK

--
"Reality is a very strange place."

Dwayne Mac Kinnon,
910252m@dragon.acadiau.ca, Acadia University, N.S., Canada.
Organisation: European Space Operation Centre (E.S.O.C)
Date: Tuesday, 26 Jan 1993 12:47:29 CET
From: <SCOOK@ESOC.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Well know film, well know actor (to be)
 <1k243tINNmt1@gap.caltech.edu>

how about Jodie Foster in Candleshoe

or Danny DeVito in One flew over the cuckoo's nest

or Benny Hill in Chitty Chitty bang bang
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rchao@netcom.com (Robert Chao)
Subject: William Goldman, the screenwriter
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:48:38 GMT

What screenplays has Goldman done since he wrote "Adventures In the Screen
Trade"?

I only know of Chaplin, and by the way, was that a rewrite or did he write
it from scratch with other people?

-- 
Robert Chao
Oakland, California
From: mkassler@memstvx1.memst.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: <None>
Date: 26 Jan 93 20:58:12 GMT
Organization: Memphis State University

In article <C196tp.GKB@cck.coventry.ac.uk>, sri007@cck.coventry.ac.uk (Freddie) writes:
>>>So how about it?  Movies that are so complicated, so bizarre, that you felt
>>>you needed a second (or third, or fourth...) viewing to fully comprehend?
>>>For me, it's "Naked Lunch".  Just saw it the other night and it left me 
>>with the thought "I really liked it -- whatever the hell it was about!".
>

     Movies I thought deserved a second viewing:

--  "Chinatown":  It was great the first time I saw it I wanted to see it
agian.  The basic story was easy enough to follow, but it took several viewings
to see some of the  subtle nuances that Polanski included.

--  "The Two Jakes":  Along, the same lines as above (but JN directed this
one).  I didn't think the story was as good as "Chinatown", but equally
complex.

--  "Bright Lights, Big City":  I saw it only once, but at the time I thought
that a second viewing would be needed to follow it.


M.A.K.
Memphis State University
   
> 
> 
>
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: well know film, well
Date: 24 Jan 93 10:18:02 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

BK>A (minor) hobby of mine is to 'collect' well know films that featured a famou
BK>ctor/actress before they became famous. Examples:

BK>Harrision Ford in Apocalypse Now

Harrison Ford was already famous when APOCALYPSE NOW was finally
released, in 1979.  STAR WARS was a 1977 film, and the rest, as they
say...

You can see Ford in another superb Francis Coppola 1970s film: THE
CONVERSATION, from 1974.  (Coppola made that one between THE GODFATHER
and THE GODFATHER PART II.)
---
  SLMR 2.1a  USA Today: For people who find TV news too complex.
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA
From: dougm@hal.com (Doug Moran)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: My rating scale (was Re: Movies you just GOTTA see more than once)
Date: 22 Jan 93 23:06:06 GMT
Reply-To: dougm@hal.com (Doug Moran)
Organization: HaL Computer Systems, Inc.; Campbell, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: gizmo.hal.com
In-reply-to: anna@psych.toronto.edu (Anna Filippone)

In article <1993Jan16.153602.25939@psych.toronto.edu>, anna@psych (Anna Filippone) writes:
>Feeling that we've been exhausting the topic "Movies you couldn't see more  
>than once", I felt the spin-off "Movies you just GOTTA see more than once"
>should be introduced.

I have long had a personal film rating scale of

o I want to see it again in the theatre
o I want to watch it again when it comes out on video
o I wish I had waited until it came out on video
o I wish I had never rented this stupid video

This is, of course, *very* subjective.  For instance, there are a number
of films that I think are good -- even excellent -- but would not, for
various reasons, ever want to see again.  I never want to see DANGEROUS
LIASONS again, for example, but I have watched BUCKAROO BANZAI any
number of times, and I would be hard-pressed to say that the latter is a
better film than the former.  We're not talking quality, here; we're
talking entertainment value.  (BRAZIL, DEAD RINGERS, and GALLIPOLI are
other films that I'm not sure I can watch again, in spite of the their
quality).

On the other hand, I could watch STAR WARS, AMADEUS, BUCKAROO BANZAI,
HOPSCOTCH, BLADE RUNNER, CASABLANCA, THE BIG SLEEP, LITTLE BIG MAN, REAR
WINDOW, WITHOUT A CLUE, SINGIN' IN THE RAIN, and any number of others
many, many times.  (I've forgotten how many times I've  watched
CASABLANCA, BLADE RUNNER, and SINGIN' IN THE RAIN -- one for each mood.)
SINGIN' IN THE RAIN
-- 
    Doug Moran        |  You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch;
   dougm@hal.com      |  you're a nasty, wasty skunk.
 {...}!hal.com!dougm  |  Your heart is full of unwashed socks,
 HaL Computer Systems |  your soul is full of gunk, Mr. Grinch.
From: jwp@aber.ac.uk (J W Perkins)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:06:47 GMT
Organization: University of Wales, Aberystwyth

In article <1jnucfINN1qp@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ac717@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jeffry L. Johnson) writes:
>Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
>
>>jwp@aber.ac.uk (J W Perkins) writes:
>>
>>>Something that happened twice last year to my irritation was having cleaning
>>>lights switched on while I was sitting watching the end credits.
>
>Credits are one of my biggest peeves. I like to watch credits. Every time I 
>have run a film for an audience and the filmmaker is there, the filmmaker 
>insists on leaving the houselights OFF during the credits. I couldn't agree 
>more. I have had major disagreements with managers telling me to turn on the 
>lights. I will absolutely refuse if the credits also involve any image other 
>than a black screen. I will bring up the houselights if there are only credits. 
>But they stay down for such films as FBDO, Wayne's World, Airplane, etc.
>
>-- 
>Jeffry L. Johnson                                    CWRU Film Society Alumnus
>Technologist, HLA Lab, Institute of Pathology, CWRU/Univ. Hosp. of Cleveland
>Projectionist, Centrum Theatre;      IATSE Local 160  Officer: Examining Board

Good for you Jeffry. Keep up the good work!
                                                     Jeremy Perkins
From: bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: MANHUNTER/SILENCE OF THE LAMBS
Date: 22 Jan 93 02:41:24 GMT
Organization: Ohio University School of Art, Athens

In article <C177Bx.LyK@news.cso.uiuc.edu> twr43417@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Trevor W. Ramsey) writes:
>
>  As someone said earlier, O.K., I'll bite.

>  Another weakness is the way "Manhunter" was adapted.  I have read both of 
>  Thomas Harris' novels, "Red Dragon" and "Silence of the Lambs" and found
>  that Demme's movie was much truer to the source than "Manhunter."  If you


One of the things I've always 'respected' about "Manhunter" is the
title. That is, Mann seemed to be admitting that this wasn't "Red Dragon"
but a different movie adapted from parts of the book. I thought that I
saw something going on in SoTL that I've never seen mentioned. It's often
brought up that Lector helped Starling psychologically by helping her
face her problem and then exorcise it by rescuing the woman. But, what
about Lector? After a career of dealing with patients like Gumms friend
who are not only scumbags but don't respond to his help he gets to aid
someone he really cares for. I thought that a main point was that they
were both 'cured'. Well, helped, cured is a little too generous. I'd 
really like to see them do a new version of "Red Dragon". I'd like to 
see the same Will Graham as in "Manhunter" but a longer, more expensive
movie that followed the book more closely. "Manhunter (IMO) still ranks
as an all time classic though.

Bob Church
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:12:12 CST
From: <U28698@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Where's the director?

Spike Lee is Marz Blackmon in 'She's Gotta Have It.'

Spike Lee is Larry Fishburne's cousin(?) in 'School Daze.'

Spike Lee is Mookie in 'Do the Right Thing.'

Spike Lee is Wesley Snipes' neighbor in 'Jungle Fever.'

Spike Lee is Shorty in 'Malcolm X.'
From: lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Reservoir Dogs note
Date: 23 Jan 1993 10:09:40 GMT
Organization: Mr. Lazlo's Temple Of The Mighty Rude-Boy Skank
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: triton.unm.edu

rchao@netcom.com (Robert Chao) writes:

> What's Tarantino going to do now?

According to the February "Film Threat", he's writing a film called "Pulp
Fiction" (to be produced by Lawrence Bender and exec'd by Danny DeVito),
and then scripting and coproducing the movie John Woo will make after he
finishes up the Jean-Claude vehicle "Hard Target".

--
Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)
From: erobinette@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Stanley Kubrick:doing what now?
Date: 25 Jan 93 11:14:50 EST
Organization:  Wright State University 

In article <1993Jan23.001732.17263@leland.Stanford.EDU>, phadrus@leland.Stanfor
d.EDU (Neil A Evans) writes:
> Hey all,
?Any ideas what Stanley's doing now (and what he's done since Full Metal Jacket

There's no definite news, but Premiere magazine recently hinted that he was 
beginning work on a new film. They listed him as the 100th most powerful person
in Hollywood, saying (paraphrased)

"Hasn't made a movie since Full Metal Jacket in 1987, so what's he doing here?
Answer: Upon completing a new script, CAA agent Mike Ovitz (the most powerful
person in Hollywood by all accounts) and the Warner Bros. chiefs immediately
flew to London to read it. HAL-lelujah, that's power!"

Eric Robinette
erobinette@desire.wright.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: ctn2d@Virginia.EDU (Christopher Thomas Nidel)
Subject: Re: More Weird List
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:50:33 GMT

thanks buddy, i really care a lot
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies