HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Frank Bilotti <frank@wanda.princeton.edu>
Subject: Re: Eagles thrashed! Ha Ha Ha! Go Boyz!
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A77716D05C01700D@rambo.princeton.edu>
Originator: news@nimaster
X-Xxdate: Mon, 11 Jan 93 12:21:36 GMT
Organization: Geology Dept, Princeton Univ
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:40:08 GMT

In article <1is3hsINNaju@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> Skywalker,
skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu writes:
>Come guys, 
>The Eagles had a good year, they accecepted the loss with class
>saying "We got our butts kicked".

Agreed, cudos to all of the Iggles (at least those I saw on TV) for
taking the loss like men and not crying about it.  I know how hard it is
to take a loss like this, I'm a hurricane fan.

>
>Try to win with class too.
>

We'll try, but this is great

>As for Sunday:
>If the Niners think for a minute they can play this Sunday like they did
>Saturday and beat Dallas someone better give them some smelling salts.

Well said, well spoken

FRANK
__________________________________________
Go 'Canes & Cowboys
frank@wanda.princeton.edu
__________________________________________
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: DALLAS
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 17:26:30 GMT

In article <1993Jan10.140817.3721@math.ucla.edu> rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:

I guess this is confirmation that some mathematicians live in
their own world (or the Cowboys/Eagles game has intoxicating effects).

>Dallas is the best team to ever play the game.

60's Packers, 70's Steelers, 84 49ers, 85 Bears.

>Aichman is the best quarterback in football.

Staubach, Unitas, Montana, Graham.

>Emmitt Smith is the best back in the history of the game.

Brown, Simpson, Payton.

>Philly sucks. Cunningham will choke. Philly doesn't want it.

1-0 in playoffs this year. 1 more than Dallas.

>Dallas will pound the field with them. 

That's why they play the game.

>Dallas has a much better defense. Philly's D only looks good on paper.

Or when you are on your back looking up because Philly put you there.

>
>Dallas 70 (10 touchdowns on ten posessions)
>Philly 0 (net yards: rush -95, pass 3)
>
>( P.S. maybe if Buffalo is lucky, they can work out a trade with Dallas 
>for Emmitt Smith. They'd give Thomas, Kelly, Bennet, AND Bruce Smith, and
>a few drafts picks here and there. After all, it worked for Minnesota.)
>--
>Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@joshua.math.ucla.edu)
>
>The meek shall inherit the Earth. The rest of us are going to the stars.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mas@cray.com (Michael A. Sand)
Subject: Re: The FAT LADY IS SINGING in BUFFALO!
Reply-To: mas@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 4 Jan 93 08:40:27 CST

Somehow, I knew when Houston returned the interception for a touchdown and
then followed up with the onside kick that Houston would end up paying for
trying to rub Buffalo's face in it.

Boy was I right.

---
 ______________________ ____________________________________________________
|                      |                                                    |
| Michael Sand         |                                                    |
| Cray Research, Inc.  |  Cray Research - The manufacturer of the world's   |
| Chippewa Falls, WI   |                  most powerful supercomputers.     |
| email: mas@cray.com  |                                                    |
|______________________|____________________________________________________|

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dave@bradley.bradley.edu (David Vessell)
Subject: Re: How Bad Is...?
Keywords: cardinals
Organization: Bradley University
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 21:21:25 GMT

fvaughn@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Frederick Vaughn) writes:

>How bad an owner/executive/all-that is Bill Bidwill? Explain.

Quite simply, he's more interested in making money than putting a quality
product on the field, and he tries to use his exclusivity on an area to
accomplish this.

Bidwell left St. Louis because the city would not build him a new domed
stadium, in spite of the fact that he couldn't even come close to filling
Busch Stadium, then the second smallest stadium in the NFL.  Now, had he
been selling Busch out every week, that would be different.  

He has continually balked at paying for talent.  I can't think of a
talented player developed by the Cardinals that ever signed a second
contract because they could always get better money elsewhere.  The ones
that stayed (Jim Hart, Pat Tilley, Roy Green, Neil Lomax) did so because
they felt obligated to the city and forewent the money they could have
gotten elsewhere.  Many of those that stay get destroyed by injuries
because of talent droughts in other areas.  Like Neil Lomax.  Lomax could
have been the best quarterback in the league at his peak, but he was forced
to retire at the age of 29 because of injuries....the rather porous
offensive line just couldn't keep him safe.  The Cardinals have had
star-calibre offensive linemen (like right tackle Dan Dierdorf, who should
be in the hall of fame if he isn't already), but one man can't carry an
otherwise lousy offensive line.  Now Timm Rosenbach is nicknamed 'the
walking X-ray'.  I can't imagine why.

For so long the St. Louis fans were lambasted by the league for being
impatient crybabies.  Billy scampered off with his toys to Phoenix and
promptly imposed the highest ticket prices in the NFL on those poor
football starved fans.  Now, five years later, the Suns outdraw the
Cardinals.  The St. Louis fans have been vindicated.
-- 
*davE*   Making the world safe for intelligent dance music.  dave@bradley.edu.
########## David L. Vessell -- Bradley University Computing Services #########
Your shame is neverending. Just one psychological drama after another.-Erasure
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 10:21:49 EST
From: <KJB6@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Blackout in Buffalo

It was blacked out in the Erie, PA viewing area also .... We are in Buffalo
territory even though most fans are Browns or Steelers.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Subject: Ditka in Denver
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 22:41:27 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NARC Atlanta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5


Elway and big Mike! God that would be interestion



(humor intended, no flames pls.)
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NFC Playoff Games, Jan 9/10
Date: 5 Jan 93 19:29:34 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1993Jan4.220049.3142@pbhyg.PacBell.COM> dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok) writes:
>The Eagle defense was ranked #6 and the offense
>#7, a good balance.

Of course the Cowboys defense was #1 and their offense #4, an even better
balance. :^)

Daniel Welch 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Subject: Re: The Saints Cha-Choke
Organization: Abode Computer Systems
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 04:03:26 GMT

In article <103579@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>Next week... the 2 bst games in the NFC: Eagles at Dallas, Skins at 49ers!

What does that say about the NFC East when 3 of the final 4 teams are all from
the NFC East? Deffinately the toughest division of the NFL.

Eric


-- 

		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mcdowell@iies.ecn.purdue.edu (James M McDowell)
Subject: Bear Coach question
Keywords: Before Ditka
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date:  6 Jan 93 19:13:29 GMT

Could someone please tell me the Bear coach(es) between Abe Giberon
and Mike Ditka. Thanks very much!

Jim

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jeffr@ssec.wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin)
Subject: Re: Chris Dishman's whining
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Space Science and Engineering Center
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 18:19:51 GMT

In article <43057@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>, kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:
|> In article <C0D1w2.6vC@acsu.buffalo.edu>, kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
|> > Did anybody see Chris Dishman's postgame interview? He refused to give
|> > credit to the Bills and said that he couldn't say that the Bills did
|> > anything spectacular in the game, but rather that the Oilers choked.
|> > The greatest comeback in NFL history is not spectacular? yeah, right. Shine
|> > up your golf clubs, Chris. You'll have the entire off-season to whine.
|> > --Jim
|> 
|> 
|> Dishman was right. The bottom line, the Oilers choked. The reporters asked
|> him about what happened to the Oilers, and he responded. Now, Frank Reich gave
|> credit to Jesus for coming back and winning the game.. as if *He* really
|> cared who won the game.

I agree.  Give credit to the Bills for not giving up, but this game was much more
Houston's loss than it was Buffalo's win.  At this level of football, there's 
simply no excuse for blowing a 32 point lead.  Houston simply handed the game
to the Bills.
Before you Buffalo fans flame away, let me say that I'm neither a Houston nor
Buffalo fan.  All just my opinion.
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Parsells to Patriots???
Date: 12 Jan 93 01:43:18 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1ist0eINNe81@bigboote.WPI.EDU> cor@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Cory Shimer) writes:
>
>
>but thats ok when rebuilding, (but you can't rebuild over 10 years)
>
>perhaps a good topic for discussion is how long a rebuilding program 
>shold take before it becomes ineffective?

Actually, a wise man (Tom Landry... would you believe a good coach then?) once
said that it takes just that... 10 years for a rebuilding team to peak.  This
of course includes the development of a QB, etc.  I'd use as my example, the
Steelers of the 1970s... they started in 1969 with the development project and
probably peaked in the late 1970s (Bradshaw wasn't considered a super QB until
their 3rd Super Bowl).

>
>I'd say 5 years is probably the absolute maximum time... otherwise
>you starts losing too many players to age or injury. So the 
>Patriots have about 2 or 3 years before they have probably
>failed in an attempt to rebuild.
>
>Anyone looking to rebuild ought to look at Dallas!!!
>
>how long did it take them?
>was it about 4 years?

Probably the exception to the rule above.  JJ had the benefit of keen
foresight and was able to trade players like Hershel and Steve Walsh into
draft picks.


satish nair
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: grout@sp90.csrd.uiuc.edu (John R. Grout)
Subject: Re: NFC Playoffs show restructure necessary?
Reply-To: j-grout@uiuc.edu
Organization: UIUC Center for Supercomputing Research and Development
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 22:31:55 GMT

fins@radgumbo.Eng.Sun.COM (Rich Schiavi) writes:

>With 3 of the 4 final teams coming from the NFC East (which seems to
>be a fairly frequent occurance. . ) has anyone heard any talk of 
>restructuring the conferences the way they should be.  I.E. Dallas
>and New Orleans should be in the Central. Phoenix in the West.
>Tampa Bay and Atlanta in the East.  I think that about covers it.
>The Niners will still have no talent to go against swapping Phoenix
>for New Orleans, but it does beef up the Central and tame the East a bit.

After expansion to 30 teams, I prefer the five geographical
conference, six team per conference realignment which has already been
discussed by league officials... I know how much a similar realignment
helped the NHL (cut travel costs and created new rivalries...  think
of a home-and-home Giants/Jets series).

--
John R. Grout			| INTERNET: j-grout@uiuc.edu
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles Victory...
Date: 5 Jan 93 18:49:21 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1993Jan4.194817.18066@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> pws2n@vision1.ee.Virginia.EDU (Philip Weaver Smith) writes:
>Now, for those with short memories . . 
>
>Philly at Dallas 10 - 20.
>Dallas at Philly 7 - 31.
>
>Now which is a thrashing?

The first one, despite the score.  In the first game, Dallas played just
as good as Philadelphia, but turned it over once when about to score, and
twice more deep in their own territory.  It's hard to win when you shoot
yourself in the foot so many times; Eagle fans should know that after the
Packer game.  Didn't the Cowboys outgain the Eagles in the first game?

The second game, in contrast, was a pretty complete domination by the
Cowboys.  Emmitt had 163 yards, and the offense in total 398, against the
then-ranked-1st defense.  The defense was all over the Eagles, limiting
them to 201 yards, a couple of first downs, and 1-10 on third down.  It
was only 3-0 at the half, but that doesn't reflect how much better Dallas
was in the first half.  The Eagles had one (or maybe no) first downs, and
Randall was something like 3-13 for 15 yards and done for the day.  MacMahon
coming in surprised everyone, including the Cowboys' defense.  The Eagles
got a quick touchdown, but that one drive was *it* for the whole day.

The Eagles are playing better now, but so are the Cowboys, and you better
believe Johnson is going to have them fired up for this one.  I'll take
offense, coaching, special teams, and home-field over an (ever-shrinking)
advantage on defense.

My prediction:  Cowboys 24-13.

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cpg@caribbean.bellcore.com (Curt Goedde)
Subject: Giants Headcoach Sweepstakes
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 15:34:12 GMT

Well, it looks like Tom Coughlin of BC has been given the job (if he wants it).
According to most local papers and sportscasters Coughlin met with GM George
Young yesterday and was extended an offer by the organization.  The official
comment from the Giants was that he was given an outline of the job description.

It does not appear that Bill Parcells will even be contacted about the
position.  

-- 
Curt Goedde                    |    Bell Communications Research
cpg@caribbean.bellcore.com     |    Piscataway, NJ
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ik@puffin.ctt.bellcore.com (Ik Su Yoo )
Subject: Re: "The Catch" (WAS: Randall, Emmitt, and "The Catch")
Reply-To: Ik Su Yoo <ik@mobydick.leis.bellcore.com>
Organization: Bell Communications Research
	<1993Jan11.190027.14379@ncsu.edu>
Date: 12 Jan 93 07:43:35


In article <1993Jan11.190027.14379@ncsu.edu> mcanders@eos.ncsu.edu  writes:

> I too cheered for the Niners over the skins' because as much as
> I wanted home field for da Boyz, "The Catch" devistated me (I was
> only 7 but believe me it did) and I have wanted a chance at the
> Niners ever since.
> 
> Over/Under on TV replays of "The Catch" this week is currently 40.
> I saw it 9 times yesterday alone.
> 

Why does the media and everybody else only talk about "The Catch"? If I
remember correctly, after the catch was made by Clark Kent, there was
almost a minute left in the game (55 seconds I think). Sure enough, D.
White was marching down the field soon afterwards, until...  "Hacksaw"
Reynolds sacked him and caused a fumble near the midfield. IMO, the
sack/fumble was as an important play, since Dallas only needed a field goal
to win. Does anyone else remember that part of the championship game?
--

Ik Su Yoo
RRC-4F728, x5764
ik@mobydick.leis.bellcore.com
From: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM (Bennet Ih - Sun BOS Hardware)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Seattle took Philly to OT?
Date: 6 Jan 1993 23:11:02 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. - BDC
Distribution: world
Reply-To: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: mowgli.east.sun.com

In article 7527@mksol.dseg.ti.com, dansmith@mcopn2.dseg.ti.com (Dan Smith) writes:
> Is it true that Seattle took the mighty Philadelphia Eagles to OT
> this year? How can you Eagle fans possibly be woofing about your
> team and how they're going to beat Dallas and such? This is
> ridiculous! 

[stuff deleted]

> The other two losses were the Rams (requisite blown game of the year,
> all teams including SF have em', even though this game still came down
> to the last play) and Washington. Washington was dominated in that game
> until the fateful, ridiculous, fumble call, which cost Dallas that game.
>

This is great! You make such a big deal about Philly having to go to OT to beat
the Seahawks but you just blow off the Cowboys' loss to the Rams as if it were
insignificant! Maybe the Rams game was a "requisite blown game"; you can
just as easily call the Seahawks game a "blown game" that the Eagles still won.
Actually the Eagles dominated the game but 190 yards in penalties will make 
any win look ugly.

As for the Eagles losses, let's see who they were to:

Kansas City (9-7?), Washington (9-7), Dallas (13-3), Green Bay (9-7) and San 
Francisco (14-2). You may notice each of these teams has a winning record
and they were all on the road. That is certainly nothing to be ashamed of. 
So unlike the Cowboys, no blown games here!

Seriously, Dallas has had a great year but only a fool would discount the Eagles
have a chance at pulling off the upset. Should be a great game and to the victor
go the spoils (and woofs I guess).

-Bennet
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The FAT LADY IS SINGING in BUFFALO!
Date: 6 Jan 93 02:02:50 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <C0Ar3M.1zu@acsu.buffalo.edu> ajay@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ajay Shekhawat) writes:
>jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
|
|>current score:  Oilers  35  Bills  3
|
|>Moon and company are in total control of this game.
|>Does anyone want a play by play?
|
|Oh yeah?  Last time I checked, the Fat Lady was  speechless (as was
|the Houston Offense, Defense and the Coaching Staff), and the score 
|was  41 - 38 *BILLS* ! (OT)

Don't you think he might have figured that out by now.   With all the
woofing about the "greatest comeback ever" some seem to forget that they
had to get behind by 32 points in order to achieve that record.  I'd be
seriously concerned with the Bills defense right about now.
From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills - Toooo Legit to Quit
Date: 5 Jan 93 02:53:22 GMT
Organization: UB

In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.85.0@QM.cis.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!) writes:
>Unbelievable!  Congrats to Bills and faithful fans for sticking this out.
>
>Now some comments on some of you bill bashers. (note I am not a fan)
>Lots of folks were saying the "jills suck" and will lose it in the playoffs.
>
>Well get your reality check in place!  They won this game WITHOUT their 
>starting QB and one other essential player (who I cant name at the moment) 

Cornelius Bennet missed the entire game, and Thurmal missed most of the
second half. By the way, where was Ray Childress? 1 tackle? C'mon, now.

>and CAME Back from a RECORD number of points down.
>
>Any team that can pull out a win under those conditions is a legit 
>contender.  (well maybe not against an NFC East team ;-) joke for the 
>humor impaired  )
>
>They clearly took advantage of the fact that the Oilers CHOKE under these 
>conditions.  (This makes the 5th choke for the oilers this year, no?)
>
>Also, the FANS and noise were unbelievable, anyone who doesnt think that the 
>crowd can be a factor needs their head examined.
>
>ALN
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric West)
Subject: Re: Greatest Moment
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 02:11:22 GMT


In article <1993Jan4.174932.18395@pdn.paradyne.com> Leo James writes:
>
>Which event would y'all vote for as "the greatest moment" in
>your favorite franchise's history?

For the 49ers it would have to be Super Bowl XXIII.  Not only was it
actually an exciting Super Bowl (i.e., not decided by halftime as every
other SB seems to be), but it capped a dramatic year for the 49ers:
starting the season 6-5 (making Walsh so depressed that he announces it's
most likely his last season), winning four in a row to take the NFC West
title, somehow making it through the playoffs, winning the Super Bowl in
the final minutes with one fantastic drive that was pure Montana, and Walsh
in tears after the victory, able to retire a champion.  Absolute chills.

ecw
fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Greatest Moment (was: BILLS BILLS BILL
Date: 5 Jan 93 19:14:27 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

I think it's great how many different teams had their best moments in big
games against the Cowboys.  The Cowboys were always there, standing in the
way, and made it through as often as not.  Well, the good old days are
back, it looks like.  Cowboy haters are revving up their poison pens, but
they're going to run out of ink before the Cowboys are once again run out
of contention.

Daniel Welch
From: iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: No O in Miami
Date: 12 Jan 93 17:33:40 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

Although the Dolphins scored 31 pts vs. the Chargers, their offense left a 
lot to be desired.  Thanks to their defense, the offense only had to go
about 45 yds to get a TD!  Two of KJ's TDs were on plays where the Chargers
seemed to be totally lost.

This week, Marino and co. will be going againt a defense which knows Miami
and is playing awesome.  Forget the running game, The Bills rush D was no. !
#1 this year allowing 3.3 yards a carry!

Odomes and J.D. Williams are coming of their best games of the season.
Maybe some of those 7 sacks on O'Donnell were coverage sacks.
Henry Jones is having a superb year and will be able to shut down Keith 
Jackson.

However, Miami's problem is this:
If KJ stays in to block for Marino, Marino loses the tight end target to 
throw to.  But if KJ goes for a pass, the Bills will probably get to Marino
3+ times (like last time!).

Tony Paige will be the key to the game.  Miami needs him to pick up the
now almost all the time blitzing Buffalo D.


Imran Qureshi
From: rhoads@blaze.rutgers.edu (Glenn Rhoads)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: DALLAS
Summary: Have you heard of sarcasm?
Date: 10 Jan 93 23:43:49 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Cc: rhoads


In article <1993Jan10.172630.9416@pbhyg.PacBell.COM>, dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M) writes:

> I guess this is confirmation that some mathematicians live in
> their own world (or the Cowboys/Eagles game has intoxicating effects).
> 
> >Dallas is the best team to ever play the game.
> 60's Packers, 70's Steelers, 84 49ers, 85 Bears.
> 
> >Aichman is the best quarterback in football.
> Staubach, Unitas, Montana, Graham.
> 
> >Emmitt Smith is the best back in the history of the game.
> Brown, Simpson, Payton.
> 

 <similar such text deleted>

 > 
 > >Dallas 70 (10 touchdowns on ten posessions)
 > >Philly 0 (net yards: rush -95, pass 3)


Just one question.  Have you ever heard of sarcasm?

-- Glenn Rhoads
From: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM (Bennet Ih - Sun BOS Hardware)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Dan Fout's(?) comments on Boyz/Iggles
Date: 11 Jan 1993 14:58:55 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. - BDC
Distribution: world
Reply-To: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: mowgli.east.sun.com

Did anyone else hear Dan Fouts (I think) comment that when Jimmy J was
rebuilding the Cowboys, his specific objective was to create a team that
could beat the Eagles? Alas, looks like he's succeeded. Sunday's game looks
like it marks the end to Philly domination over Dallas. I was willing to
overlook the previous game in Dallas as a fluke but Sunday was no fluke.
Let's hope Philly doesn't become Dallas' whipping boy as the NY Giants
have become the Eagles'.

-Bennet


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro