From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: EDDIE'S BACK!
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 00:26:43 GMT

The Reader's Digest Version for Sports Fans:

In article 26299@cbfsb.cb.att.com, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <LOWRY.92Oct7170735@rotor.watson.ibm.com> lowry@watson.ibm.com (Andy Lowry) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct7.162053.3664@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>> > 
>> >  
>> > Do you think Diane will be there in
>> > school when someone decides to pick on young Dylan. Do you think
>> > the bully at school picks on bigger people generally. 
>> >  
>> > So you see I was referring to 
>> > life. Is a tie in developing for you? No?
>> > Well thats OK.
>>
>>Your comments sounded like a criticism of Diane's
>>handling of the situation. 
> 
>Your interpretation did sound like a criticism.
> 
>> Perhaps you can be a little clearer
> 
>The material I "quoted" was her post.
>you can do less inferring in your quest for an argument.
> 
> 
>>in your future posts.  
>>
>>what in the world were
>>you basing your comments on?  Diane gave no hint how she would
>>want her son to react were he to encounter a bully with no adult present.
> 
> I based my post on my opinion. 
>>
>>I have no idea what you're referring
>>to.
> 
>A very strange
>case indeed. 
>
>>
>> > > > A man has to do what a man has to do.
>> > >
>> > > why the gender-specific remark?
> 
> look up "expression".
> 
>> >  
>> > you
>> > have decided to imply I'm a chauvenist, do you
>> > always strike up the cause of feminism.
>> > Perhaps you are one of those 90's type
>> > guys.  I hope I haven't offended you.
>>
>>It was a chauvinist turn of phrase,given the context 
> 
>100% bullcrock.     
> 
>>were discussing sexual stereotypes, for crying out loud!)
> 
>The first post was referring to two boys
>fighting and the mother not wanting her son to. 
>not a post primarily about 
>sexual stereotypes. Perhaps an offhand comment
>about boys.not the crux.
>
>>choose your phrases more
>>carefully.
> 
>Choose your interpretations more carefully 
>Andy Lowry's interpretations.
> 
>>
>> girls don't get beat up.  But in real
>>life women get beat up. feminism was and still is
> 
>the discussion was about playgrounds in someone else's face. 
>you probably know more about it.
> 
> 
>>Women are far from having 
>>opportunities they deserve, and they are
>>subjected to emotional and physical abuse, on a scale
>>I have yet to see carried out toward the 
>>male population.
> 
>absolutely nothing to do with fighting 
>but thank you for sharing that with me. 
> 
>>
>>I have no idea what "90's type guys" is
>>supposed to mean.  If I did, then I'd be offended, you
>>might as well consider your hopes spoiled. 
> 
> Actually I could care less. I would
>approve.
> 
>>told you what I think of feminism, 
> 
>I knew you would Thats what I call
>diatribe. they rattle on about it.
> 
>>be sensitive. I'm a guy.
>>
> 
>Your like god Andy. 
> 
>>I'm no a**hole.
> 
>Try again.
> 
>>It's not always that easy,
> 
>Fascinating, people try to be complete assholes.
> 
>
>>men have been a**holes in their
>>treatment of women.
> 
>Andy. You are a real piece of work.
> Do you receive counseling. I suggest you do.
> 
>>
>> > > > Eventually your son will being fighting for his slice of the
>> > > > pie in life and you are not going to be there.
>> > >
>> > >It sounds like Diane will have prepared him well to fight for what
>> > >is rightfully his, but not to exploit weaknesses in others to get
>> > >what is
>> >  
>> > Nice leap of logic pal. Yes she did a wonderfull job. Mommy he
>> > didn't give me my ball. Then Dylan saw his mother getting pissed
>> > off and said "I shall not exploit weaknesses in others." Do you
>> > watch a lot of cartoons?
>> >
>> > I personally would have said "Either you can have your child behave
>> > civilly or I'll do it". I certainly would not sit there and let my
>> > kid get bullied.  My son is under strick orders to tell his teacher
>> > if he is hit. If the problem is not resolved and he is hit a second
>> > time he is to hit back.  Out of curiosity Andy do you have any
>> > children or are you some snot nosed recent "mature" graduate?
>>
>>I'm snot-nosed, I'm not a graduate, and I have a child.
>>And I don't want to be your "pal."  Anything else
>>you'd like to know?
> 
>Teach me Andy mold me to be as great as you. No you would not want to be
>my pal and likewise I assure you. 
> 

HERE ENDS ANOTHER 'BEST OF FRIENDS' POSTING.
Newsgroups: soc.singles