Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Monday, 14 Dec 1992 13:53:58 CST
From: <U56673@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: UL: Monumental LSD overdose taken
 <1992Dec14.063941.16953@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com> <Bz92o5.F75@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
 <1992Dec14.154637.15152@news.eng.convex.com>


In article <1992Dec14.154637.15152@news.eng.convex.com>, gardner@convex.com
(Steve Gardner) says:
>
>In article <Bz92o5.F75@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> (null
>pointer)@rock-opera.cc.purdue.edu (Dartanyan the Witchling) writes:
>>       Spelling flames are really lame.  Is this all you could come up with
>>to use as an attack on the boy?
>        Not when the spelling is so poor as to render the text almost
>        illegible.  A spelling error once in a while is perfectly
>        understandable but this post was an abomination.  Do people spell
>        like that on papers in college these days and still pass their
>        courses?  If so, it is no wonder that the rest of the world is
>        eating our lunch economically.
>
>
>
>                                                        smg
Perhaps i can offer a suggestion.  If you people don't like to hear what i have
to say.  Then don't read it.  If my spelling annoys you SO much that it renders
what i have to say null and void, then just don;t read it.
I have a question, can those of you holding the flamethrowers find a serious
informational error in anthing that i have posted?  Although i am much relieved
to see that now it is only my spelling at question.
lets see... first i was an incompetent person because i didn't post references.
now i am a more-on beecuze I hav absoelootly knoe repekt fore spelling.
I was also accused of throwing my ideas to the big fish in the pond...
Well, if you guys think you are "big fish" then is is clear to me that I am
flamed not because of my spelling and information.  but because the "big fish"
feel that i should have a more questioning attitude.  It must be an ego thing.

Listen, i know that there are a lot of organic chemist more competent than i.
i know that most of the people who are flameing me are more competent than I.
I also know that you suspect that this group would still be debating skin absor
tion if i left it up to these "Competent" organic chemist.  It is a shame that
people should be so hostil to someone who obviously is competent and does have
information to contribute.  JUST BEECUZE OV THA WAI HE SPELLES.

well, those of you who don't like my post can just skip over them from now on.
I will no longer wast my time defending myself against unwarrented flames.
your ascii charicters will be wasted on me...
HOWEVER.  for those of you that will still read my hurrendous post... bravo

someone asked about wether or not DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide?) can be used to get
lsd throught he skin.....
Answer:  I haven't a clue.. but we CAN speculate.
this would depend a lot on the charicteristics of the solvent and the lsd...
IF lsd is easily solvated by DMSO then MY GUESS is that the DMSO would penetrat
e the skin and pull the lsd in with it (where it is fee to enter the bloodstrea
m)  I really haven't a clue as to weather or not lsd is solvatable by dmso.
you might want to try acetone (easily available)  It probably wouldn't damage t
he lsd if it didn;t work either... you could probably just lick the lsd off you
r arm (or wherever you put it) if it didn't work.  thats just my speculation.

malcalypse -perturbed by the nature of people
PS> I mayk tha best possible yuse ov modwryen spell schecking deevises.

Newsgroups: alt.drugs