HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: twcaps@tennyson.lbl.gov (Terry Chan)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: Alt.quotes newsgroup?
Date: 14 Dec 1992 04:34:59 GMT
Organization: Department of Redundancy Department
Reply-To: TWChan@lbl.gov (Terry Chan)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.12.117

Chua Quotes djb6@midway.uchicago.edu: 

  +>A cute idea.  Are you sure it wouldn't step on alt.folklore.urban's toes?

and writes:

  +Doubt it. Most quotations don't quite qualify as folklore, unless they're
  +the "Did-he-really-say-that???" type, I guess.

Hah!  Sez you!

Terry "Who said that?" Chan
--
Energy and Environment Division   | Internet:  TWChan@lbl.gov
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory      | 
Berkeley, California  USA  94720  | Carpe Per Diem
Xref: sparky alt.config:7830 alt.atheism:23436
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.santaism
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 17:02:00 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64635.student.cwru.edu

In article <OLDMAN.92Dec12031039@titan.ucc.umass.edu> oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Tig Stone) writes:
>In article <1992Dec12.060620.23826@netcom.com> jef@netcom.com (Jef 
Poskanzer) writes:>
>> I propose a new group dedicated to discussion of the religion Santaism.
>
>	Well, first of all, _I_ saw this as alt.satanism, and I'm sure
>that most people would misread it on first glance.

	Pst: I think  that is the point....
Xref: sparky alt.config:7930 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10196 alt.rush-limbaugh:11708
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 14:51:37 EST
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum

In article <1gl52rINN4mf@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>,
pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (if God's your father then call home!) says:

>I would like to formally propose a new group, alt.conservative.forum,
>a moderated group to discuss conservative values and assorted political
>goings-on from a distinctly right-wing standpoint.

Why do we need a moderated group?  There are intelligent liberals here, who
help stimulate thought.  The stupid ones are easy to ignore (or flame, which-
ever is your preference. :)

>Rationale:  Let's face it:  the net is infested with liberals.  I won't
>say this is either good or bad, but the fact is there.  Another fact:

This is absolutely true.  You'll get flamed for saying this (I said it once,
and got flamed, I don't know why), but you are completely right.

>some jerks with distinctly left-wing tendencies like to post to groups like
>alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and post tons of gibberish about everything
>conservatives stand for, without factual defense of their positions.

So ignore them.  I don't understand why there's a problem which calls for
a moderated newsgroup.

(BTW, as a lot of liberals are sure to point out, and I agree, there are
 occasionally some conservative jerks and idiots here too.  Not as many as
 there are liberal ones, IMO, but they're around.)

>A moderator, a charter, and some internet clues (like how to send a newgroup
>message) for the man proposing this group are needed, and would be much
>appreciated.

Now here you go, this is why I don't like moderated news groups:
WHO decides what is 'intelligent' and what is not.  Sure, sometimes it's
obvious, but not always.  I don't believe in letting any one person decide
what is worthy of being posted, and what isn't.  Especially when there's no
need for it.  (In other words, it's over-regulation of the net...)

Just my opinion... hey, if you were moderating this group, would this post
have made it to the net? Just wondering... :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Kurt  E.  Ludwick     | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
 kel111@psuvm.psu.edu  |             what's the opposite of Progress...?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.mud,rec.games.mud,rec.games.mud.misc,rec.games.mud.admin,rec.games.mud.diku,alt.mud.t-rev.stomp.stomp.stomp,rec.games.mud.lp,rec.games.mud.tiny
From: scythe@stein.u.washington.edu (The Grim Reaper)
Subject: Re: alt.mud.logs,alt.mud.logs.d,alt.mud.fiction,alt.mud.fiction.d
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 03:48:29 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.023513.23986@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF) writes:
>In article <1992Dec11.133913.21067@oz.plymouth.edu> j_herlih@oz.plymouth.edu (Axl) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec11.030109.16251@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF) writes:
>>>Well, the proposed rec.games.mud.* additions: *.logs, *.logs.d, *.fiction,
>>>and *.fiction.d., all failed, I open discussion on creating analogous
>>>groups within the alt. hierarchy.  Jim Miller, the master of Secret Ninja
>>>Logging, is still interested in serving as moderator of *.logs, and I'm
>>>trying to find out from Tank Girl if she still wants to moderate
>>>*.fiction.  I think there's enough interest out there for these groups to
>>>exist... let's have some comment.
>>
>>	Christ, give it up, willya?  The majority has spoken, so just
>>accept it.  Make a mailing list or something.  There certainly isn't
>>any justification for a newsgroup (alt.* or not) with so diminutive an
>>audience.
>>*Humor Alert*
>>rec.pets.fish gets more traffic than your *.log groups would :) :)
>>--
>>-Axl @)-->--- 
>> j_herlih@oz.plymouth.edu - "There can be only one"
>
>The majority opposed adding these groups to rec.*.  They did not vote on
>whether there should be groups of this sort at all, as there was no
>question concerning this on the ballot.  Seventy-some people indicated
>interest in the groups for whatever reason.  As the groups prosper and
>succeed, perhaps more will take up the banner.

So?  That's 70 out of how many voting?  Get real.... no one wants these groups.
If they did, they would have voted yes.  Give it up! Don't even bother calling
for another vote, please.

Newsgroups: alt.config,rec.arts.books,alt.non.sequitur
From: wolf@cheshire.oxy.edu (Clinton Richard Wolf)
Subject: Re: alt.fan.catch-22 (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.fan.anne-rice)
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 USA.
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 04:45:03 GMT

>
>Hey!  I got an idea!  How about a group called alt.fan.catch-22?  I've
>always been a big fan of Joseph Heller's masterpiece.  Yossarian Lives!
>
>Heh heh heh heh heh.
>
 I think Catch-22 is the closest thing to a bible there is for me...

 Form the newsgroup, or I'll slit your throat from ear to ear.. :)


Newsgroups: alt.config
From: pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (if God's your father then call home!)
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: New group proposal:  alt.conservative.forum
Date: 15 Dec 1992 17:36:27 GMT
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Reply-To: pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra.rose-hulman.edu

I would like to formally propose a new group, alt.conservative.forum, 
a moderated group to discuss conservative values and assorted political
goings-on from a distinctly right-wing standpoint.

Rationale:  Let's face it:  the net is infested with liberals.  I won't
say this is either good or bad, but the fact is there.  Another fact:  
some jerks with distinctly left-wing tendencies like to post to groups like
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and post tons of gibberish about everything
conservatives stand for, without factual defense of their positions.

A moderated group would cut out this gibberish and allow reasoned, intelligent
discussion of the issues facing the country and the world.  Intelligent
conservatives (and I will propose intelligent liberals as well, since, 
contrary to popular conservative opinion, such animals do exist) will be
encouraged to participate in our discussions.

A moderator, a charter, and some internet clues (like how to send a newgroup
message) for the man proposing this group are needed, and would be much 
appreciated.

Chuck Pearson
clueless chuck				                     ___
pearsodc@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu                             (o o)
------------------------------------------------------------w U w------------
|DOUGLAS C PEARSON JR                |we were headed for somewhere          | 
|rose-hulman institute of technology |but that was before                   |
|campus box 1204                     |you traded in your peace sign         |
|5500 wabash avenue		     |   for a finger...                    |
|terre haute, indiana  47803         |			- steve taylor, 1992|
Xref: sparky alt.config:7879 news.groups:24231
From: goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb)
Newsgroups: alt.config,news.groups
Subject: Re: rec.arts.fantasy
Date: 14 Dec 1992 05:12:18 GMT
Organization: The Sinister Icy Black Hand of Death Club
Reply-To: goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu (David Goldfarb)
NNTP-Posting-Host: earthquake.berkeley.edu
Originator: goldfarb@earthquake.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Dec12.185804.9766@leela.cs.orst.edu> casspa@atlantis.CS.ORST.EDU (Paul Cass) writes:
)I was really
)looking for a newsgroup on the writing of fantasy rather than discussions
)of published works.  
)
)Paul

	That's a somewhat narrow topic to devote a whole group to. There
is a group misc.writing, about the practice of writing in general. You
could try to start some discussion there about writing fantasy.

-- 
   David Goldfarb          | 
goldfarb@ocf.berkeley.edu  |      "Hey, mister! Your ninja's dragging!" 
goldfarb@UCBOCF.BITNET     | 
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: scythe@hardy.u.washington.edu (The Grim Reaper)
Subject: Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:41:57 GMT

In article <1gqb17INN59o@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> rick@crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Richard H. Miller) writes:
>In article <92352.102515KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>, Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>> In article <BzDnnu.L9K@news.udel.edu>, roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby) says:
>> 
>> >I vote for democracy in action -- no moderation.
>> 
>> And I agree.
>
>Then you will have no problem with proposing the misc.activism.progressive
>be unmoderated? (Actually I am surprised that nobody has proposed the
>perfect name for this newsgroup --> misc.activism.conservative)
>
>
>-- 
>Richard H. Miller                 Email: rick@bcm.tmc.edu
>Asst. Dir. for Technical Support  Voice: (713)798-3532
>Baylor College of Medicine        US Mail: One Baylor Plaza, 302H
>                                           Houston, Texas 77030
Naah.  We're all to busy posting to be active.
=)


Newsgroups: alt.config
From: shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu (Sam Hulick)
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.questions
Organization: Vallen Software
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 03:19:09 GMT


Well, I've gotten a lot more aye's than nay's.  So how do I create the
new group?

-- 
    // Amiga 3000   ___ \ Sam Hulick: shulick@indiana.edu (NeXTmail OK!)
   // 68030 25 MHz /__/\ \ My opinions wear combat boots.  Or whatever.
\\// OS 2.04       \__\/ / "Walk!  Not bloody likely.  I am going in a
 \/                     / taxi."  --George Bernard Shaw
Xref: sparky alt.config:7991 news.groups:24550
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.config,news.groups
Subject: Re: rec.arts.fantasy
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 14:11:47 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

skwatkin@nyx.cs.du.edu (Steven Watkins) writes:
>  I really see the need for an alt.fantasy news group.

It's already being proposed, under the name alt.conservative.forum.


mathew
-- 
Lung cancer and arteriosclerosis.
For people who like to smoke.

Newsgroups: alt.config
From: blade@dorsai.com (Terry Hoffman)
Subject: New group: Alt.politics.conservative
Organization: The Dorsai Embassy +1.718.729.5018
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 13:14:20 GMT

I support this too.

Xref: sparky alt.config:7892 alt.atheism:23579
From: corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley )
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.santaism
Date: 13 Dec 92 18:33:23 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson

I vote yes.

Ho! Ho! Ho!!!!!
Newsgroups: alt.config,news.groups
From: ian@nasser.eecs.nwu.edu (Ian Sutherland)
Subject: Re: rec.arts.fantasy
Organization: EECS Department, Northwestern University
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 14:27:11 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.172522.26109@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> skwatkin@nyx.cs. du.edu (Steven Watkins) writes:
>I would rather not force
>sf fans to read fantasy posts as I am forced to read theirs now. 

Speaking as a science fiction fan, I don't mind reading posts about
fantasy.  I don't believe I'm an anomoly.  If I REALLY hate some thread
you start, I can put it in my kill file.
-- 
Ian Sutherland
ian@eecs.nwu.edu

Sans Peur
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.john-palmer,news.admin.misc,biz.comp.services
From: rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Subject: Re: newgroup comp.society.folklore
Followup-To: news.admin.misc,alt.fan.john-palmer
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 03:42:54 GMT

(Psst, I've set followups...)

Palmer is at it again.  Gad, what a bozo.  The vote was for: 151,
against: 729.  This is the lamer who wants people to call CAT-TALK to
read news.  Somewhat like asking a rabbi the best way to prepare ham.

On the other hand, a posting that appeared right after this one in
alt.config indicates that he may have known exactly what was going on
and decided that newgroup voting, CFDs, RFDs, etc. don't apply to him.
Or, he may not understand it.  He totally zoned on the fact that
comp.society.folklore already exists and the "present" should have
been an unmoderate control rather than a newgroup for best effect.
It's the eternal question with Palmer / Tygra / Michigan.com: pathetic
moron or deranged vandal?


|Control: newgroup comp.society.folklore
|Newsgroups: alt.config,comp.society.folklore.ctl
|Path: qualcom.qualcomm.com!walter!uunet!caen!destroyer!Tygra.Michigan.COM!news
|From: news@tygra.Michigan.COM (USENET News Manager)
|Subject: newgroup comp.society.folklore
|Organization: CAT-TALK Conferencing System
|Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:02:17 GMT
|Approved: news@tygra.michigan.com (USENET News Manager)
|Message-ID: <1992Dec17.020219.23751news@tygra.Michigan.COM>
|Lines: 4
|As per voting.
|   FOR: 729
|   AGAINST: 151
|   FOR COUNT > 100? YES


>Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.config,alt.folklore.computers
>Path: qualcom.qualcomm.com!walter!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!Tygra.Michigan.COM!jp
>From: jp@tygra.Michigan.COM (John Palmer)
>Subject: Re: RESULT: comp.society.folklore unmoderation fails 729:151
>Organization: CAT-TALK Conferencing System
>Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:03:50 GMT
>Message-ID: <1992Dec17.020351.23814jp@tygra.Michigan.COM>
>References: <BzCIKI.751@polaris.async.vt.edu> <8145@l <BzD7GH.865@polaris.async.vt.edu>
 
>PS: I'm sending you a Christmas present :->
-- 
Daddy, what does FORMATTING DRIVE C: mean?
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.graffiti,alt.geek
From: mgm@world.std.com (michael g moncur)
Subject: New newsgroup proposal - alt.quotations 
Followup-To: alt.config
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 05:52:42 GMT

  [I have consulted with the original poster of this idea, Chua Hak Lien, and
got permission to post this.  Thanks for the idea, Chua.]
 
 Proposal for a new alt.group - alt.quotations (name is open for debate.)
 
 PURPOSE:  for quotations, quips, .sig lines, witticisms, and discussions
of all of the above. 
 
 VOTES:
 
    Please send Yes votes, No votes, and suggestions for the name
(alt.quotations is my pick) to my address: 
 
    mgm@world.std.com
 
  WHY A NEWSGROUP? 
 
    I think there's quite a bit of interest.  We see quotations all over,
particularly in  .sigs.  When this was first mentioned in alt.config,
there were 8 responses in one day. 
 
  WHY AN "alt" GROUP?
 
    I'm not THAT sure about the interest, and this topic will have a very
large "fluff factor."  If it works out as an alt group, perhaps a "talk"
or other USENET group will come of it.
 
  WHAT IS A QUOTATION? 
 
    I'm sure there are all sorts of smart-aleck answers to that question,
but here are some examples of what *I* would use the group for:
 
"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and
as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."
        --Albert Einstein

"Duct tape is like the force.  It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds
the universe together...."
        -- Carl Zwanzig

"Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it
every six months."
        -- Oscar Wilde

"Horse sense is the thing a horse has which keeps it from betting
 on people."
        -- W.C. Fields

"Charm is a way of getting the answer yes without asking a clear
question."
                -- Albert Camus

"Girls are always running through my mind.  They don't dare walk." 
                -- Andy Gibb

"Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards.  I got a full
 house and four people died."
                -- Stephen Wright

I think you get the idea.  If you reply to this message in e-mail to make
your vote, PLEASE don't quote this entire message (I may like quotations,
but not THAT kind.)  I'd rather not receive 300 copies of this message in
my mailbox.
 
 Thanks.
-- 
~`~`michael moncur - mgm@world.std.com / sysop@onlybbs.via.mind.org ~`~`
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: Alt.quotes newsgroup?
Date: 12 Dec 92 07:09:08 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

To make sure you don't attract posts from users wanting to discuss the
merits of " vs '' vs ' vs <<>>, I suggest the group be renamed to
"alt.quotations", a la Bartlett's Familiar.
--
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin  "People that are really very weird can get into
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu   sensitive positions and have a tremendous impact
Keep circulating the tapes.      on history." -- Dan Quayle, on Malcolm X

"Father yes son, I want to kill you.  Mother, I want to----WUAAAAAAAAAAARGH!"
	-- Jim Morrison, waxing poetic on family values
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.politics.perot
From: byrd@lucerne.rice.edu (Marc J Byrd)
Subject: Re: Remove these election groups
Organization: Rice University
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:40:19 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.224625.9729@hellgate.utah.edu>, thomson%jensen.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Rich Thomson) writes:
|> [Please note that followups are directed to alt.config]
|> 
|> OK, the election is over.  I propose that these groups be removed,
|> since their sole raison d'etre was the election in the first place:
|> 
|> 	alt.politics.bush
|> 	alt.politics.clinton
|> 	alt.politics.marrou
|> 	alt.politics.perot
|> 
|> Actually, I already issued an rmgroup for a.p.m since the idea was
|> already discussed there.
|> 
|> Yes, there are still lots of articles being posted to some of the
|> groups (at least the bush group), but 99% of those are cross-posted
|> and are just general political discussion, not discussion of the
|> election.
|> 
|> 						-- Rich
|> --
|> 

Please do not rmgroup the alt.politics.perot group.  We are trying
to get something like alt.politics.usa.uwsa or some other name
for a group for discussion about United We Stand, America, the
political group which Ross Perot started and supports.  Once this
group is created, I suppose it might be ok to rmgroup a.p.perot &
others, but what's the rush?


-- 
Marc J. Byrd - byrd@rice.edu       |  United We Stand. 
Rice University                    |  Whether or not you accept it, you are 
Dept of Elec & Comp Engr           |  responsible for the actions and 
XUV Holographic Microscope Project |  inactions of your government. 
Xref: sparky alt.config:7935 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10208
From: rlc1028@zeus.tamu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum
Date: 15 Dec 1992 16:59 CST
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: zeus.tamu.edu

In article <mjenkins.724448799@cunews>, mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes...
| 
|>"moterated", as in only politically correct conservative doctrine allowed?
| 
|Politically correct conservative doctrine? Now *that's* an oxymoron if
|I've ever heard one.
| 
|I thought conservatives were as far from political correctness as you
|could get.

	Haven't you noticed that there are two paradigms?  Politically 
correct on the Right, and politically correct on the Left.

	The Right has its own set of buzz-words, principles, slogans,
and ideologues.  In fact, wasn't the term, "politically correct" first
used by Right wingers to refer to a set of political assumptions that had
begun to prevail in America?  I never heard of the term until conservatives
on this campus used to as a rallying cry to fight off perceived liberal
policies here.  In doing so, they're setting up their own agenda of
"how things ought to be".  That's the essence of a Politically Correctivist
system.

	And, is a special forum for "intellegent conservatives" really
necessary, since I always thought that they were the same thing as
"classical liberals"?  No, you say?

Gadson
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us (Gerry Swetsky)
Subject: Re: This is ONLY a concept
Organization: Vpnet Public Access
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 22:42:02 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.130806.12064@nevada.edu> thealien@nevada.edu (Minstrel Alien) writes:
>
>	What exactly is needed to justify an alt.fan group?

    Merely a strong desire to speed the demise of the alt hierarchy.

>		What I conceptualize at the moment is
>
>			alt.fan.boc
>
>To discuss the music, background, etc of the group Blue Oyster Cult.

    Well, I'm sure everyone looking at 'boc' is going to instantly know
    what it stands for.

    Look, there are at the very least, 72 alt.fan newsgroups.  Some of
    them have a fair amount of traffic in them:

    alt.fan.dan-quayle 0000007809 0000260 y  (this due to a flame war)
		       ^^^^^^^^^^

    But most of them seldom get any traffic at all:

    alt.fan.wal-greenslade 0000000002 0000000001 y
			   ^^^^^^^^^^

    My advice?  Take your efforts and go buy a begonia.  It's much
    prettier to look at.

--
============================================================================
| Help stamp out stupid .signature files!           Gerry Swetsky  WB9EBO  |
|                 vpnet - Public access Unix and Usenet                    |
| Home (708)833-8122       vpnet (708)833-8126      lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us |
============================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.monty-python,alt.fan.letterman,alt.fan.dave_barry,alt.fan.pratchett
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)
Subject: Re: Proposal: alt.tv.mash
Followup-To: alt.config
Organization: Two rooms filled with typography, in downtown Boston
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:35:59 GMT

norbeck@pleiades.cs.bucknell.edu (Naughty Nukes NY in her 1999 Nissan) writes:
>
>Proposal:  alt.tv.mash

No, no, no: alt.tv.m*a*s*h!

That way they'll never be able to rmgroup it, because if they tried
they'd delete everything that had an m, an a, an s, and an h in that
order.  

Hey, did you buy the 1999 Nissan from Martin Landau, used, by any chance?


Seriously, do the M*A*S*H group.  It's the 20th anniversary of the TV
series, the remastered episodes have recently begun to air, the final
episode will be repeated for the first time in two months...  

							-- K.


Xref: sparky alt.config:7925 alt.rush-limbaugh:11698 alt.flame:16730