HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Jones....Touchdown 49'errrrrrs!
Date: 21 Nov 92 18:40:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1eh1mrINNh24@morrow.stanford.edu>, GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes...
>In article <Bxy36F.Ku2@acsu.buffalo.edu>,
>v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...) writes:
>>In article <4835@equinox.unr.edu>, harrisl@unssun.nevada.edu (Larry Harris)
>>        writes...
>>
>>>BTW, the 9'ers two minute offense was a work of art. Absolutely perfect.
>>
>>No.  The Bills running the no-huddle makes every other team's two-minute offense
>>look befuddled and disarrayed by comparison.  Just how fast and how efficiently
>>they run it amazes me every time I see it.
>>
>>BILLS 26, 'FINS 20
>>
>>                                        ---Chet Zeshonski

>Oh come on Chet!  Very few people who have professional opinions
>regarding the NFL will rarely dispute the fact that the 49ers run
>the best 2 minute offense in the NFL.  

No, very few people with *your* "professional opinion" dispute this "fact."

>					The only other team that I
>can think of who comes close to the Niners is Denver.

Then I suggest you think harder.  I have watched the Niners several times this
year, and although I think they run a very good two-minute drill, I still find
it seemingly plodding and seriously lagging when compared with that of the 
Bills.

>The Bills may run the no-huddle great, but I have yet to see them
>win a Super Bowl with it.  

And, I have yet to see this year's Niners win a Super Bowl with it either.
	
>Have you ever wondered why they run
>the no-huddle Chet?  

Yeah.  It further improves an offense with the game's best running back, one of
its best QBs, a great trio of receivers, and the best O-line in the league.

Any other question?

>Have you ever wondered what they may be like
>if they didn't run it?

Gee, I seem to remember '88 as a pretty good year...

Touche.

>                                                   Tony
>                                                GO 49ERS!!!

					---Chet Zeshonski
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: htilney@vax.clarku.edu
Subject: RE: Steeler WRs
Organization: Clark University
Date: 21 NOV 92 17:26:11 GMT

In a previous article, un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu wrote:
>In article <12NOV92.00343281@vax.clarku.edu>, htilney@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>> I wasn't implying that Pittsburgh doesn't have good recievers.
>	Ok, he wasn't.
>> I meant nothing more that they might trade Green for a decent WR.
>	But he is now.  If this doesn't imply that they don't have good WRs,
>then what does?
If I had written "they might trade Green for a decent WR BECAUSE THEY 
DON'T HAVE ONE NOW," then I would obviously be putting down the Steeler
recievers. As it stands, I can see how you might INFER something like that,
but an insult was not intended.
> 
>> I agree that Graham, Mills and Stone are fine for the offense,
>What else do you use Wrs for?
> 
"The offense" as in "THIS offense." The WRs are fine for Erhardt's 
conservative scheme.

I'll try to make my remarks crystal-clear from now on. NOT!

-		
Bart "Webb" Tilney	
Email: htilney@vax.clarku.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cs902043@ariel.yorku.ca (SHAWN LUDDINGTON)
Subject: NFL SURVEY 
Originator: cs902043@c03.ariel.yorku.ca
Keywords: NFL SURVEY
Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada
Distribution: york
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:27:51 GMT


I have always wondered who the net feels is the best at each position!
So instead of posting the SI's midseason pro-bowl selections, I would like
to post the nets pro-bowl selections!

All I need is for each person to e-mail me who they favour at every position
(all list them below), and I will tally them and post the results around 
Christmas.

Mail me at cs902043@ariel.yorku.ca

The positions I will count are as follows:

Quarterback:
Fullback:
Halfback:
Wide Receivers: (1)
		(2)
Tight End:
Left Guard:
Left Tackle:
Center:
Right Tackle:
Right Guard:
Place Kicker:
Punter:
Return Man:

Defensive Ends: (1)
		(2)
Defensive Tackles: (1)          includes NT in 3-4
		   (2)
Outside Linebackers: (1)        includes LLB and RLB in 4-3
		     (2)
Inside Linebackers: (1)         includes MLB in 4-3
		    (2)       
Cornerbacks: (1)
	     (2)
Strong Safety: 
Free Safety:

Coach:
Favorite Team:

Please do not list more players than asked for, unless you feel there is a tie!

SHAWN


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chrisc@cae.wisc.edu (Chris Carey)
Subject: Re: Eagle fan commits suicide (Re: 'Gang Green')
Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering
Distribution: na
Date: 23 Nov 92 12:07:18 CST

If .300 is the Packers winning percentage over the last twenty years it's
certainly higher than the Eagles.  Plus, have you already forgotten the
manhandling the Pack gave you last week?  Hey, what have the Eagles done for us
lately?  Except screw up every season.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: doan@aslws01.asl.dl.nec.com (Duc Doan)
Subject: Thanksgiving
Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:06:38 GMT

CBS will feature "The Resurgence of AMERICA'S TEAM" during the half time
of the Cowboys and Giants game on Thanksgiving. Most of the NFL owners
will certaintly say thanks to the Cowboys this Thursday for filling up their 
stadium. Thank you god for the Cowboys and please let them keep winning. Amen.
      Doan
-- 
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Duc H. Doan               	  doan@asl.dl.nec.com			|
| NEC America, Inc.                                         		|
| Advanced Switching Lab          TEL: (214) 518-3608       		|
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Worst Halftime Show...
Date: 20 Nov 92 05:34:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

I nearly had to puke when I saw it...

Coming Up At Halftime:
--1972 Dolphins
--Dan, Al, and Frank

C'mon, we had to see these morons all through the actual *game* ferchrissakes!

Who wanted to see more???

					---Chet Zeshonski
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Whiners 21, Saints 20
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:50:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: .



I think Charlie Brown put it best when he said:

AAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUUURURRRRRRUUUAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!


I don't kneaux what I HATE WORSE!!!   The entire Niners organization or the
Saints PREVENT DEFENSE!!!  

And anutta thing:
No more of this "THE BUCS SUCK SO RUN OVER ME"  "HANDLEY FOR PREZ"  "WHO
CAN I ROOTT FER BESIDES THE PACK"  ALL-CAPS schmutt!  If you're not a
LIFELONG SUFFERIN' SAINTS FAN, YOU AIN'T DIDLEY!!!!!!!!!


J.J.(GOD give us another trip to Candlestick this year!!) Clyde
From: v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The biggest hit in the NFL?
Date: 15 Nov 92 23:16:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <Bxo37o.J3I@ecf.toronto.edu>, nava@ecf.toronto.edu (NAVA ALEXANDER) writes...

>This year Thomas has compared himself to three different
>athletes in other leagues and proclaiming himself the
>BIGGEST HIT in the NFL.  Please!!!  Why doesn't Thomas
>shut his mouth and play football.  He's a good enough
>player to do anything.  
> 
>If anybody can quote SI directly on Thomas Proclamation,
>please send me a copy.
> 
>alex nava
>nava@ecf.toronto.edu
> 
According to USA Today and the Buffalo News, Thomas claims to be misquoted.  Oh
well -- I agree that he *should* let his play on the field do the talking.

Jon

>prediction:  Buffalo 24 at Miami 13
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49ers/Rams
Date: 23 Nov 92 23:45:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Nov23.015411.11074@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>, marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes...
>Best lines of the day :
> 
>Chris Berman, doing a promo on ESPN's Kansas City-Seattle game "Yes,
>the Seattle Seahawks, the team that put the 'O' back in 'Offense'".
> 
>John Madden, after observing a 49ers' lineman relaxing on the bench :
>"You know, there ought to be a rule that prohibits defensive linemen from
>crossing their legs while they're sitting on the bench."
> 
>John Madden, discussing a tape showing him catching a pass from Joe
>Montana during a practice session yesterday : "OK, this tape is in extra
>slow-motion, that's why it looks like I'm running so slow..."

And don't forget ESPN's SprotsCenter announcer showing Deion Sanders "vogueing"
his way into the Bills' end zone:  "And this play sealed the win for Atlanta...
uh, no, they were losing...uh, by a lot..."  (he was heavy on the sarcasm about
"sealing the win", since Deion was highstepping it in with his team down, 38-0.)

>=============================================================================
>Bob Marshall                     \\     "Women aren't as smart as they
>Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     think they are; they think we
>Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    men know a lot more than we
>marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   really do."
>"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Tim the Toolman
>=============================================================================
"The only thing backlash ever created--through all history--was more backlash."
					---Chet Zeshonski
From: dowzycki@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Ken Dowzycki)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: What do the Eagles need?
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:18:09 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.




What do you think the Eagles need, losing four out of
the last six games after a 4-0 start:

a) Buddy Ryan
b) Keith Jackson
c) Andre Waters
d) Jim McMahon
e) anyone else?

f) All of the above

All comments welcome!
From: trradrx@canctr.mc.duke.edu (R.CLOUGH)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Re: Scud's Back..... (Testeverde in LA)
Date: 20 Nov 92 15:53:13 GMT
Reply-To: trradrx@canctr.mc.duke.edu
Organization: Duke U. Med. Ctr., Durham, NC

In article <27000144@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) writes:
>A lot of people had the same perception of Plunkett.  If you compare the 
>two during their early years you may have something to think about.  When Jim
>was at NE he didn't exactly light the league up.  

Well, Plunk played well enough to win Rookie of the Year.  But the next
year NE installed an option offense (no joke) and Plunk got beaten up.  Plus,
NE's offensive line was dreadful.  Plunk still had a strong and accurate arm
when he got to Oakland, and he finally had the chance to play behind a good 
line.  Perhaps that would help Vinny as well.
	Robert Clough, DUMC (though still not speaking for them)
"Don't worry about the missed free throw, Christian.  We all make mistakes."
--Richard Nixon to Christian Laettner, after he missed the front end of a 
one-and-one with one second left, playing Arizona
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: drhall1@pbhya.PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Subject: Re: Seahawks score... a touchdown!!!
Reply-To: drhall1@PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:30:58 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.014647.8192@serval.net.wsu.edu> jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:
>This is not a misprint.  I just saw it on ESPN.  Really.
>This is certainly worth a post.  I believe it's their
>sixth of the year, right?

The Vikings defense also scored a TD. That means the Vikings defense has still
scored more TD's than Seattle.

>
>Jim
>-- 
>Jim Jungbauer                 |  Go Vikings, Northstars, Cougars!
>jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu    | 
>EECS Department               |  "Nice move by Bellows... big drive... SCORES!"
>Washington State University   |     -- Mike Emrick, 1991 Norris Division Finals
From: chris@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM ()
Subject: Re: THE BET II
Organization: NCR Corp, E&M-Columbia, Columbia, SC
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 19:40:39 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.104850.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>ille.edu> <1
>Sender: news@netnews.louisville.edu (Netnews)
>Organization: University of Louisville
>Lines: 31
>Nntp-Posting-Host: ulkyvx02.louisville.edu
>
>
>    
>                    
>                     FAN                           FAN OF
>      
>                    *1. Abhay                      Bills
>                    *2. Dan Kary                   Dolphins
>                     3. Chris                      Bills 
>                     4. Bill Perry                 Bills
>                     5. Jon                        Bills
>                     6. JMC162 Penn St. U.         Bills
>                     7. delarocq North Car. St. U. Bills
>                     8. James E. Kist              Bills
>                     9. markl@spuddy               Bills
>                    10. Joel Ian Marcey            Bills
>                    11. Richard Turner             Dolphins
>                    12. Jim Bohy                   Dolphins
>                    13. -doug THE dolfan-          Dolphins
>    
>                   * = Gentleman's bet
>         
>
>           Well, the spread is Buffalo by one the last I heard. Lets see 
>here: Miami at home, on a Monday night, and a dog. Should be a great AFC
>Championship. Only about another 7,620 minutes till kickoff. Hope my wife
>hides the beer till about 7:00 Monday night, or someone will have to tell
>me if I lost THE BET II.
>
>
>                                   -doug THE dolfan-
>  

   I'm surprised that Eric O. is not listed...thought he was a big      
Dolphan.  

   Haven't seen much woofing lately.  I'll be sorry to see you Dolphans
leave the net just as everybody was getting along  : )

   Anyway,  I sure as hell hope that both teams are at their peak. The stats
are incredibly close in terms of offense so I hope that that makes for an
exciting game.  

   Three hours to first beer.
   6 hrs. 17.3453 mins to kickoff!!!!!!!!

GO BILLS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

chris  
  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Eric Sybesma)
Subject: Comment on Vikes and Obligatory Anti-Woof
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 21:08:47 GMT

	It has been my opinion all year that the Vikings are
a good team.  A good team that is capable of playing good
football.  However, they have a while to go before being 
a great team.  Their offense has to play with precision. 
They need fewer turnovers and more touchdown passes.  However,
they are the best team in the NFC Central this year and that
allows them to take a shot at the big talent.  My opinion
is that if the Vikings beat both the Eagles AND the 49ers
in the next month or so, they will have reached the status
of a Great Team.  Otherwise, I see them losing the first
game of the play-offs.

And with that said, I say (having realized that my anti-woof came
too early last week)

THE MIGHTY CLEVELAND BROWNS WILL CLOBBER THE WEAKLING VIKINGS
42-10 ENROUTE TO GOING 11-5 AND BEATING EITHER THE COWPUSSIES
OR THE RED-GIRLS IN THE SUPERBOWL!!!!!!

-- 
Eric Sybesma                                    sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Harbaugh back to throw, screen to Anderson, and it's PICKED off by
 Todd Scott at the 30..25..20..10.  TOUCHDOWN VIKINGS!!!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: THE BET II BILLS FANS VOTE!!!
Originator: delarocq@c00505-119rd.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:11:17 GMT




     See previous article for very important vote...
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
1988,1989,1990,1991 AFC East Division Champions
1991,1992 AFC Conference Champions

Hungry for some fish.. Monday Night Football, November 16, 1992..

If you are a Buffalo Bills fan, email me at delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
so we can talk all about the games, insight, etc.
If you are a Packers fan, let me know. I am interested in any news
out of Green Bay...
A PROUD MEMBER OF THE BILLS COALITION TAKING THE BET II.
From: v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills best in NFL--unquestionably!!! Yup
Date: 21 Nov 92 00:46:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <168A5BC51.TCDEV009@ysub.ysu.edu>, TCDEV009@ysub.ysu.edu writes...
>In article <1992Nov20.152539.24377@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
>iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi) writes:
> 
>>
>>I think (know) that the Bills have proved that they are once again the best
>>team in the NFL!!!
>>
>   This is your opinion only.  I'm sure no one else except Bills' fans believe
>this garbage.  Since losing 2 in a row they have only beaten the hapless Jets
>by 4, the Patsies by 9, the little more than mediocre Steelers by 8 and the
>Dolphins by 6.  If this is your proof then I say dream on!

First off have you heard of the delete button.  Geeeeezzz

>>Once, again, Go BILLS!!!!!
>>
>>Imran Qureshi
>>
>>l
>>m
>   They are not that impressive.  They may have best record in AFC at end
>of season but only because the only good team they have left to play is New
>Orleans.  I look for them to get knocked off in playoffs though.
> 

And I suppose the Steelers are more impressive.  How many yards did
Barry Foster have against the Bills.  66 yards rushing.

It could be argued that Denver and Houston are/aren't good teams.
The jets, falcons, and colts are bad teams.

How can you make a statement such as "I look for them to get knocked
off in (the) playoffs though"?

The BIlls have not lost a playoff game at home since I don't know
when.  If Miami, Pittsburgh, K.C., Denver, San Diego plan on winning
a playoff game in Buffalo, they had better get the best offense
in league to do it.  Since none of these teams has the best offense
in the league, they aren't going to win with all the crowd noise,
and the weather.  The Chiefs, Miami, and the Raiders were blown
out of Rich stadium in the playoffs the last two years.  Who will
it be this year?  I say it will be Pittsburgh and San Diego.
San Diego in the second roung of playoffs, and Pittsburgh in
Championship game.  Miami will not make it to the Championship
Game because they have not had a mid season bye, and they have
the toughest part of their schedule now.

>    Go Steelers!  Love ya.  Having a good year but I'm not woofing!

Project Pasadena:  Buffalo Bills defeat Dallas Cowboys 35-24

Bruce, a Bills fan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: twolf@cs.utah.edu (Tom Wolf)
Subject: Re: comments from Ram/Niner game
Date: 23 Nov 92 19:33:55 MST
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept

In article <1erqn4INN9nm@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan) writes:
>
>2. The Niners season has started.  As I said early in the season,
>you can't make decisions about how good the D is until later.  It
>is later and they are stopping people when they need to - in the
>4th quarter.  As I said early, the Niners play run first, but that
>later in the season, they get tighter, pass rush more
>aggressively, and blitz.  They make it a policy not to put a
>defender in too exposed a position to fail.  The D will get better
>still, NOT DOMINANT, but good enough to win it all.  The Niners have
>won 3 SBs without a dominant D anyway.

What???? Won the superbowl without a dominant D? Did you watch them play?
The 49ers have always had a great D, it just rarely gets the press that
Montana & company got. 



Tom Wolf
From: k6yj@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Pittsburgh Steelers wr Stone
Date: 16 Nov 92 19:03:24 EST
Distribution: rec
Organization: Cornell University

Pittsburgh wr Stone???

I must have missed the news about why Stone is not playing...

Can anyone enlighten me???

Thanks,
David   (k6yj@cornella.cit.cornell.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: millerm@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Mikemoe)
Subject: Re: intentional grounding (Re: Bills vs. D
Reply-To: millerm@oakhill.sps.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Semiconductor Products Sector
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:47:39 GMT

In article 24531@cs.ucf.edu, tech@maitland.cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini) writes:
>In article <Bxvu45.2GJ@news.iastate.edu> jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber) writes:
>>In article <97999@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
>>writes:
>>
>>>And my personal favorite, Kelly is about to be sacked by Coleman, he tosses
>>>the ball away.  I'm still waiting for that intentional grounding call.
>>
>>Kelly threw the ball towards an eligible reciever and the ball landed at
>>the reciever's feet. Why should this have been intentional grounding? Just
>>because the three goofballs said it should be? I know the ruling says
>>something about throwing the ball to avoid a sack, but I think the spirit of
>>the rule intends to prevent qb's from throwing the ball to an area where no
>>recievers are present just to avoid being sacked. Kelly picked out a receiver
>>and threw the ball at him.
>
>Ummm... No. It was intentional grounding. I think the spirit of the
>rule intends to prevent qb's from throwing the ball away when they are
>going to get sacked. kelly accidently chunked that ball close to
>someone.
>Tony (go houston) Travaglini
>tech@cs.ucf.edu
>

Ummm. :) I thought that the ball was thrown toward a possible receiver.
I think Kelly saw him there. I think the call could have gone either
way, but I disagree with your statement above a little.

Suppose Kelly throws the ball "away" and one of his receivers catches
it. Good play, no intentional grounding. (I'm assuming Kelly doesn't
even see the receiver...he just throws it) I think as long as an eligible
receiver is within distance of the ball, make it a no call.

Oh well....life goes on.

--Mike

---
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael Miller   millerm@oakhill.sps.mot.com                 |
| (512) 891-8582   Motorola - Semiconductors  Austin, TX       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he    |
| sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might   |
| burn up.  -- Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey                    |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
From: rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NFL odds question
Date: 19 Nov 92 15:50:09 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <1992Nov18.201236.24274@asl.dl.nec.com> hunt@ssdslc12.asl.dl.nec.com (Frank Hunt) writes:

> The off indication means that the Bookies in Vegas are waiting on
> some news which could drastically effect the line. In the LA-Denver
> Game this is whether Elway will play. In the Giants -vs- Philly game
> it could be Hostetler's condition or who the Eagles will start at
> QB. Either way, the line should be available Thurday or Friday after
> the injury reports come out. 

But don't they know that I have to get my pool sheets out by
Wednesday? 8^) Don't they care? 8^)




mark