From: REGI's <NUNEZ@esevvx.cica.es>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.internals
Subject: (None)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:14:00 UTC+0100
Organization: Macro32<==>Vmsnet.Internals Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

>X-Envelope-to: MACRO32@WKUVX1.bitnet
>X-VMS-To: IN::"MACRO32@WKUVX1.BITNET"

1
13-OCT-1992 08:55:37.17
   1 00:00:00.00
14-OCT-1992 08:55:37.17
@UKCC.uky.edu:MacroMan@WKUVX1.BITNET
gutier@SEVAXU.CICA.ES

Received: from UKCC.uky.edu by ESEVVX.CICA.ES ; 10-OCT-1992 08:55:35.04
Received: from ukcc.uky.edu by UKCC.uky.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 7661; Sat, 10 Oct 92 03:54:30 EDT
Received: from WKUVX1.BITNET by ukcc.uky.edu (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 7107;
 Sat, 10 Oct 92 03:54:28 EDT
Errors-To: MacroMan@WKUVX1.BITNET
X-ListName: "VMS Internals, MACRO, and BLISS Discussions"
    <MACRO32@WKUVX1.BITNET>
Received: from CUNYVM.BITNET (MAILER) by WKUVX1 (MX V3.1C) with BSMTP; Sat, 10
          Oct 1992 02:51:31 CDT
Received: from CUNYVM by CUNYVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 3512; Sat,
          10 Oct 92 03:46:16 EDT
Received: from MVB.SAIC.COM by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
          Sat, 10 Oct 92 03:46:13 EDT
Relay-Version: VMS News - V6.0-3 14/03/90 VAX/VMS V0.0; site mala.bc.ca
    usenet.coe.montana.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!spdcc!dirtydog.ima.isc.co
m!n ewsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!npri6!murphy
X-Newsgroups: vmsnet.internals,comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: VMS shareable images, what's wrong with them?
From: <murphy@npri6.npri.com>
Reply-To: MACRO32@WKUVX1.BITNET
Date: 8 Oct 92 19:59:45 GMT
            <ld5vdbINN763@news.bbn.com>
Distribution: world
Organization: NPRI, Alexandria VA
Article-I.D.: npri6.6372
To: MACRO32@WKUVX1.BITNET
X-Gateway-Source-Info: USENET


 >    Seeing as recent discussion on this thread  has  degenerated  into  a
 >    flame  fest,  allow me to express my general disgust at the responses
 >    to Garry's (garry@ithaca.com) thoughts on VMS shareable  images  from
 >    the self professed VMS "experts" in this group.
 >
 >[stuff about ehud and carl deleted]
 >
 >    Sorry guys ... any argument that relies on four-letter-friend-getters,
 >    sarcasm, and personal attacks holds little weight in my book.
 >
 >    If  you  don't  have  anything  else  to  offer,  I,  for  one, would
 >    appreciate it if you would go find another thread to flame.
 >
 >mjensen@BBN.COM (Martin Jensen)

while it's true that ehud routinely shifts into Heavy Ridicule Mode,
this is the first time i've seen carl get emotional in the year and a half
i've been netting; he has always been helpful, informative, polite, and
(bonus points here) correct.  if he says that garry is indulging in
dec-bashing without offering any solutions, i'm willing to believe him.

it's not even a religious issue --- there's nothing to discuss.
dec decided to implement shareable images in a certain way, and so they did,
and that's all there is to it.  i certainly wish they had done it differently,
but there's no chance of changing it now because it would be incompatible.

ok
dpm
--
murphy@npri6.npri.com 602 Cameron St. Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 683-9090

              When every one is dead the Great Game is finished.  Not before.
                              --- Hurree Babu, "Kim"