From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Yet more unsubstantiated stuff from Nyikos
Summary: it's a private joke
Keywords: egotistical bastards
Date: 13 Oct 92 05:39:51 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

In article <1992Oct12.215528.3631@acd4.acd.com> wdo@TEFS1.acd.com (Bill Overpeck) writes:
#In <7188@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> sgast+@pitt.edu  
#   (Susan Garvin) writes: 
##In article <1992Oct9.135348.12154@acd4.acd.com> wdo@TEFS1.acd.com 
##   (Bill Overpeck) writes: 

###Malicious.  I had the opportunity to see them first hand at ISU
###last year.  Malicious.  Waging a campaign of hostility and bit-
###terness against pro-lifers because of existing parental consent
###laws is sadly misguided.  And these people were malicious.
##
## Who supports parental involvement laws, Overpeck?  Who lobbies 
## their legislators to introduce them and vote for them?  Who spreads 
## misinformation about the legality of piercing a minor's ears and 
## draws analogies to abortion in an attempt to sway public opinion?
#
#What do these questions have to do with my observation?

I guess you're conceding your stupidity, Overpeck.  The connection
was fairly obvious to most people.  Ask one of your many
supporting correspondents to explain it to you.

## The Bells are trying to prevent the passage of such laws
## in states that don't already have them.  People like you
## are trying to put more young women at risk.
#
#Don't tell me what I'm "trying to" do; you obviously don't 
#really know.   Does people have to share your values in order 
#to avoid being denigrated?

You're defending teen endangerment laws in another thread,
Overpeck.  

## Who is malicious, Overpeck?
#
#I've already indicated that.

Indirectly.  I know it's hard for you to admit to flaws.

##You're not just despicable, you're stupid.
#
#Deep.

Too deep for you, obviously.    Did you read the next sentence
before you commented?

## The two cases are not remotely comparable.  
#
#Ok.  Based on your incisive analysis, it probably wasn't a good 
#analogy.  How about this:  When a drug user buys and ingests a
#substance cut with rat poison and subsequently dies, are the
#anti-drug laws to blame? 

Equally stupid.  How about if a diabetic buys spoiled insulin
on the street because control freaks have made it illegal to
buy insulin elsewhere?

## I don't think that you know what "mailicious" means.
#
#You're right.  I don't.  What does "mailicious" mean?

It was a typo, idiot.  I think you do know what "malicious"
means, though.  You embody it.

## I blame you for their daughter's death.  I blame you for
## the deaths of every woman in this country who dies trying
## to self-abort or through the offices of a butcher.
#
#I am wounded to the soul.  (BTW, I also kidnapped the Lindburgh 
#baby).

Nice try at belittling the Bell's loss.  You're the one who
has to live with the results of your hatefullness.

## I have met Bill and Karen Bell.  I know grief and anger when
## I see it.  
#
#I saw those emotions in them, as well.

You did neglect to mention it.  I guess you're a lot like
Will Steeves - you say something disgusting and then try
to explain it away.

## I see a remark made to one man, not to all men, Overpeck.  You
## overestimate your importance.  
#
#Perhaps, you think everyone who disagrees with your agenda should 
#die?  

Again, Overpeck, you seem unable to recognize a comment made
to you alone as just that.  Get some help.

## I agree with CJ.
#
#What a surprise.

Really.  I guess you think that I should admire your malice.

Susan