HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: shane alan johns <sjohns@guava.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"(FIXED .SIG)
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 15:30:26 -0500

I think one rather obvious, though some cannot see the obvious on this
feed, point needs to be made.  Two uninfected gay may having sex cannot
CREATE the HIV virus NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEY ENGAGE IN SEX.  The same
is true for two heterosexual non-infected couples.  

Remember, there are three types of lies...  Lies, Damned Lies, and
Statistics...


Shane

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              SJOHNS@IUBACS --> Bitnet       "A little revolution every once
SJOHNS@KIWI.UCS.INDIANA.EDU --> Internet      in awhile is a good thing..."
SJOHNS@JADE.UCS.INDIANA.EDU --> Preferred            --Hunt For Red October
--As always, not speaking for UCS or I.U. in ANY way other than as a student-
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: mgflax@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Marshall G. Flax)
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 23:59:57 GMT

In article <w80ViB3w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>That IS part of the relationship though, actually a big part.   If the homo-
>sexual contact were really natural, it would produce offspring.  Sex is after
>all the act of reproduction.

And I thought it was the act of "putting tab A in slot B" (but more
enjoyable).

Silly me.

Is Mr. Royce going to next define stupidity as the act of wearing
mismatched socks?

marshall
-- 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++f+++++n+++++o+++++r+++++d+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++  40 Linden Lane|Princeton, NJ 08540|609-921-0962  ++++++++++++++
+++++  Copyright 1992, Marshall Gene Flax <mgflax@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>  +++++
+ c/o Jack Gelfand|Psychology Dept|Princeton University,NJ 08544|609-258-6739 +
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6842 alt.politics.homosexuality:2167
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 04:46:24 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

elf@polari.com writes:

>    Eat _that_ Jack.  Gays make better lovers.

Naw, I don't think so...  Maybe you guys have had some lame heterosexual
encounters.  But believe me, there are women out there that are VERY
"inventive" and "goal oriented"...  I was married to one for three years.

And she was super lover, and a great soul mate too!!  I really miss her alot.

But, life goes on, and other relationships occur.  I'm quite happy with the
relationship I am in now.  I hope that it lasts like the last one did.

It took a fatal car wreck to end that one.

Maybe one of you guys will come try to kill her, but I doubt that you could
find my house, even if the sysadmin here gave you my address.



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 13:38:39 GMT
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Keywords: "Bis thinks" == oxymoron.

In article <x3$vHhd8m6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
>In article <9204081556.29@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>|> In article <1=+vH+5qk6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@beyond.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
>|> >In article <9204071438.26@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>|> 
>|> >|> >Yeah, and I'll send you a map to come to Penn State, the center of all
>|> >|> >information.
>|> >|> 
>|> >|> It seems more like the center of bewilderment, to me.
>|> >
>|> >And it seems that your brain and your life are the center of misinformation.
>|> 
>|> Wrong again.  I haven't given my hard-earned money to PSU.
>
>And since you haven't, you will never be informed of anything.

I think you've got that backwards.

-- 

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 15:03:14 GMT

In article <w23aJB3w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>elf@polari.com writes:
>
>>    The fact that she is not shows just how safely, sanely, and
>> carefully we have gone into our respective friendships, be the sexual
>> or not, homosexual or not.
>
>You and your wife have extra-marital sex?  Hmm, interesting.

Consensual, too, and completely with partner's consent.  Welcome to
the real world, punk.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Well, there's homosexuality in all animals
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      / but one, and that's the pig.  If it weren't
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / for homosexuals we'd all have to live like
                                 pigs." -- overheard at Sydney Mardi Gras
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6941 alt.politics.homosexuality:2246
From: sgioia@mac.cc.macalstr.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: slang
Summary: punk stereotypes & an end to stupidity
Date: 16 Apr 92 03:06:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: mac.1992Apr15.210618.2484
Reply-To: Re: slang
Followup-To: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Organization: Macalester College

In article <1adc6c0a.ARN18a4@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au>, dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton) writes:
> In article <1992Apr11.153910.11282@amhux2.amherst.edu>, Tim Pierce writes:

> Punk also has a definition of 'dried decayed wood or other
> substance that smolders when ignited'
> 
> A terrific descriptive term for the flamed out punk fag bashers
> out there!

Yes, that's right, all punks are "fag bashers".  Get a clue.  I'm fairly sure
that there is a higher proportion of sexual deviants in the punk community than
most other groups, save expressly gay organizations and such.  I, although not
gay, happen to be adamantly pro gay rights, and a punk, but not one that would
conform well to your stereotype.  Sorry.

Alright, if you want to get technical, I'm not a piece of wood, but I am what
most people attach to the word "punk" today (i think).  Such "correct
definitions" that you all have been throwing around are useless when slang
words have replaced them in commonspeak.  End this pointless competition of
coming up with meaningless obscure definitions of words which now have clear
and widely accepted, but not "proper", meanings.

                                        It's been cute,
                                        Steve Gioia
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
From: 7741cs17@uhdvx3.dt.uh.edu (SILICON VULTURE)
Subject: Re: Regrets
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41A   
Organization: University of Houston-Downtown
X-Lunar-Date: 3 days, 7 hours, 44 minutes since the first quarter of the moon
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 01:07:00 GMT

In article <q2e6iB7w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>, djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes...

>skaven@milton.u.washington.edu (William Gilliland) writes:

>> George Weinberg introduced the term homophobia in _Society and the Healthy
>> Homosexual_ (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1972).

>Isn't that like saying 'society and the healthy alcoholic?'..

Alcoholism is considered unhealthy because it makes it difficult to function
in society.  Alcoholics have problems in their relationships, have problems
at work, have problems driving home from work, etc.  Homosexuals do not seem
to have this problem.  One of my homosexual friends graduated from Rice
University with a 3.8 GPA in computer science.  I would say that he is QUITE
successful by most people's standards.

  |  Silicon Vulture            |  Disclaimer:  Opinions?  What opinions?   |
  |  7741cs17@uhdvx3.dt.uh.edu  |  "Don't mess with me, man.  I'M CRAZY!!"  |

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinsn@carn-dum.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Welcome Melvin Gladstone, net. celeb.
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 17:36:24 GMT

In article <1992Apr17.015502.8321@unixland.natick.ma.us> bis@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bis) writes:
>In article <-o2H!**p6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@playpen.state.university (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <0ce6iB7w164w@GeoWare.COM> efudd@GeoWare.COM (Elmer Fudd) writes:
>>>mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>>>
>>>> Melvin M. Gladstone
>>>
>>>Hi Melvin.  My name's Elmer.  In a former lifetime, I was Moses.  Back
>>>when I was heir to the Pharoah's throne, I woulda been "Glad-to-stone"
>>>you.  Are you a heeb too?
>>
>>You are misinformed.
>
>You are a broken record.

No, I am K e n, and K e n is K e n, for what else could K e n be?

>>                     Melvin is a cat, for Melvin posts from a catbox.
>
>By that logic, you have shit for brains, because you post from an
>intellectual sewer.

No, excrement could not possibly substitute for a brain. Such a
substitution is not biologically stable. Apparently you are
misinformed. Remember to initiate a thought process before posting.
You might just save yourself from embarrassment.

>>A thinking process is in order here.
>
>Exactly.  So you stay out of it.

And the net.child speaks. Go back to Mommy and whine at her. She can
make you feel better.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6889 alt.politics.homosexuality:2202
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: LITTLE DANNY KARNES IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:15:54 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <2cwXiB2w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>, djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
> 
> I actually got a REAL BIG hard-on (you sweeties would love it!)
> just thinking about it!!!!! BOY!

An entire quarter inch, eh?

> Is the wife in for a treat tonite.....

Really?  Think you might be able to go for a whole ten seconds?  I'm sure
she'll be thrilled.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6948 alt.politics.homosexuality:2253 alt.sex:14823
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 16 Apr 92 14:39:50 GMT
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <1992Apr15.213233.25203@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> wooledge@ces.cwru.edu (Gregory Wooledge) writes:
>djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>>Actually, I see [homophobia] as the rational dislike of anything that is
>>quite as disgusting (to me of course) as rectal sex and things
>>like that.
>
>So you are not actually opposed to homosexuality per se, but rather the
>act of anal sex?
>
>If you met a gay man whose sole sexual experience and desire was limited to,
>say, oral sex, would your "homophobia" apply to him?

yeah, i don't do and never have done anal.  but i know *lots*
of het and bi women who have and do.  they claim it's fun.  are
you phobic towards them?  

and if it's just an aversion to anal sex, you must love us queer
women!  right?  

peg
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION...(What asshole started this thread anyway?)
Date: 11 Apr 92 16:04:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr11.100437.786

In article <4098@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu>  writes:
 
> >Fortunately, for normal <- [Karsten claims *this?* Amazing!]
> >heterosexual people, it doesn't take "practice" to get keep from
> >gagging when we copulate. 
  
> I suspect that most 'normal heterosexuals' gag around you, Smallpiece.

The reason you have to 'suspect' that is because you don't know any
normal heterosexuals.
   
> >We have a hard time with your disgusting habits.  Do what you
> >want, but don't expect our approval if you brag about it.
 
> 'We'?  Who is 'we', Kricko?  You and Stromie and Ronnie.

That is 'we' not as in alt.flame, or 'we' as in me "and Stromie
and Ronnie" but 'we' as in normal heterosexuals, Wailer.

> Nice
> to see that you enjoy the company of slimemold.  Neo-nazis on the
> prowl.  Glad to know you enjoy the company of those who promote
> violence and hate.

What a load of shit.  It's pretty damn hard to beat people up via
e-mail, would you like to explain how I could successfully promote
violence on alt.flame?  If I am promoting hate, it's because some
weak-minded fool can't live with a diversity of opinion.  But,
please, Chrissy, tell me why you are on alt.flame.  I suppose you
are here to promote peace, brotherhood, and goodwill toward all 
people?
 
> I have a hard time with fuckwits.

That should explain why you have so much trouble coming to grips 
with yourself.
  
> Halfdicks may soon be extinct as no women, not to mention sheep,
> will go near them.  What a pity.

This sheep thing again.  Really, Skinnydick, you are the most repetitive
shithead on alt.flame.  Go to K-mart and buy yourself some new lines, why
don't you?  I don't want any sheep to "go near" me.  I'll leave them for 
you, since you so obviously have no need or desire for women.

Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
Xref: sparky alt.sex:14260 alt.flame:6623
From: jn1a+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jad Nehme)
Newsgroups: alt.sex,alt.flame
Subject: Re: Homophopes/Hetrophobes?
Date: 12 Apr 92 23:03:17 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Masters student, Information Networking Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Excerpts from netnews.alt.sex: 11-Apr-92 Homophopes/Hetrophobes? Roger
P. Davis@lonestar. (570)

  >Would someone tell me -- in 100 words or less -- why homosexuals hate
>hetrosexuals/hetrosexuals hate homosexuals/everyone sexuals seem to hate
>everyone else sexuals?  Remember, 100 words or less.  And the question is
>WHY not HOW MUCH.


	Well, apart from the gross generalization, the answer (in less than a
100 words) is: sexuals(?) and non sexuals hate what is different. 
Racism is not limited to one's sexual practices.

Jad Nehme
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:18:24 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <2kq0iB5w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>
djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>(I have a VERY large penis too! [for the motss'ers out there])

Evidently, seeing as you're advertising.

If it makes you feel better, whatever.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6335 alt.politics.homosexuality:1837
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 92 23:35:53 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:

> This is true.

Yep.

> However, this is not.  Do you define a natural child as a child who has
> DNA from both people who are currently raising it?  If so, then your 
> definition is correct.  However, adopted children are just as natural
> as non-adopted children.  

BIOLOGICAL, hows that?

> You have this strange obsession with DNA.  Why is this?

Just because that I have one of my own, and perfectly natural, and biologically
mine!  Well, if you and your "hubbie" can do that, I will shut up.


> Your first statement was a fact.  Your second statement was your own bigotted
> take on that fact.

Look again...



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Stale Dan gets caught lying
Keywords: Steely Dan and William Burroughs novels
Date: 9 Apr 92 14:51:18 GMT
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce 'Steely Dan' Bufalini) writes:
> In article <55PNiB16w164w@mantis.co.uk>, mathew@mantis.co.uk (From A to B) wr
> |> We're just amused by the fact that you ended up naming yourself (indirectl
> |> after a chromium-plated dildo.  That's all there is to it.
> 
> And just who is "we"?

Well, all the people I've mentioned it to, for starters.  They all laughed --
or at least sniggered.

> You seem to be quite misinformed.

Oh, Ghods.  Another K e n clone.  How original.


mathew
-- 
Buddy, can you spare a paradigm?
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 16:56:00 GMT

In article <9204170823.58@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:

>Too late.  This has been going on since the sixties.  That's why syphilis
>and herpes are household words these days.


Syphilis has been a household word for much longer than that.  Let's face
it, as early as WWII, there were lots of anti-VD movies, where syphilis
was common. 


This one has been around for a long time...

FWA
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6418 alt.politics.homosexuality:1896
From: dfpedro@nv2.uswnvg.com (Donn F. Pedro)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:57:40 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: US West NewVector, Bellevue, WA

In article <1992Mar27.020416.5116@intelhf.hf.intel.com> pgryan@intelhf.hf.intel.com (Paul Ryan) writes:
>
>Does anyone really understand instinct?  How the birds know where to fly
>when they migrate, or instintively go through complicated mating behavior?

From: _The Tao of Pooh_

Ask a scientist why some animals seem to have knowlege of certian bahaviors
but have had no opportunity to learn and they answer "instinct".

Translation: "we don't know."




     Donn Pedro ...................{uunet, sequent, pn400}!uswnvg!dfpedro.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Subject: Re: Declaration of War on PSU
Reply-To: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Organization: PENN$YLVANIA $TATE UNIVER$ITY
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 01:01:30 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.114811.1330@wkuvx1.bitnet>, kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) writes:
|> In article <rg1wHn7_p6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@across.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> > In article <1992Apr12.152023.1315@wkuvx1.bitnet>, kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) writes:
|> > |> In article <n1$vH$&7m6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> > |> > In article <1992Apr8.112327.1257@wkuvx1.bitnet>, kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) writes:
|> > |> 
|> > |> > |> Oh, my mistake. You're not his puppet, merely an imitation.
|> > |> > 
|> > |> > There you go admitting to being misinformed.  Even your correction is
|> > |> > misinformation, as I am not imitating anyone or anything.  You appear to be
|> > |> > imitating being a real flamer.
|> > |> > 
|> > |> Then could you inform everyone on the net as to why one could take your name
|> > |> off the post, put Ken's on, and no one could tell the difference?
|> > 
|> > Because we are both very informed.  Perhaps you need some clues.  Just ask us
|> > if you need any; we have lots of them.
|> > 
|> If I needed a clue, I'd want one that would give me some idea of what's going
|> on, i.e. not from you or Ken.

Translation: Mr. Chaos likes to be and wants to be misinformed.  Our clues are
extremely informative.  Still sure you don't want any?

|> > |> > |> Then perhaps you might actually read a post or two before blindly typing "You
|> > |> > |> are misinformed" over and over again. But I guess telling you in a post defeats
|> > |> > |> the purpose.
|> > |> > 
|> > |> > I read every post before posting a followup.  I type "misinformed" so
|> > |> > frequently because you and everyone else posting here cannot make accurate
|> > |> > and intelligent statements.
|> > |> > 
|> > |> Or they're so intelligent accurate that they overload your underdeveloped
|> > |> brains and lead you to not understand them.
|> > 
|> > My brain is fully developed, and has been every day of my life.  Your jealousy
|> > will not get you anywhere.  Give up.
|> 
|> Jealous of a couple of half-wits who seem to have nothing better to do than
|> type oggle and tell other people that they're misinformed? HA!

Show me one post of mine where I typed "OGGLE."  You appear to be lying.
You still seem to be jealous about not having an underdeveloped brain, which
you claim that I have, but do not.  Get a life, moron.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6906 alt.politics.homosexuality:2216 alt.sex:14747
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:55:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: Nitro.Z3qBJB2w164w
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

7741cs17@uhdvx3.dt.uh.edu (SILICON VULTURE) writes:

> Alcoholism is considered unhealthy because it makes it difficult to function
> in society.  Alcoholics have problems in their relationships, have problems
> at work, have problems driving home from work, etc.  Homosexuals do not seem
> to have this problem.  One of my homosexual friends graduated from Rice
> University with a 3.8 GPA in computer science.  I would say that he is QUITE
> successful by most people's standards.
> 

Goody.. I know a guy who graduated from UCLA with a 3.6 in CS and
then got stoned and blew his brains out four weeks later.

All I am saying is like a 'healthy alky'.. There ain't no such
animal.

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 05:19:58 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

efudd@GeoWare.COM (Elmer Fudd) writes:

> Fudd.
> 
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    | "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy" |
>    |            Elmer Fudd         -> efudd@GeoWare.COM <-             |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

I'd be happy to supply you with that frontal lobotomy now.  You can have
your baby bottle in front of you too if you wish.



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
From: dfpedro@nv2.uswnvg.com (Donn F. Pedro)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 9 Apr 92 16:48:18 GMT
Organization: US West NewVector, Bellevue, WA

In article <1992Mar26.199.433211@eos.ncsu.edu> bpasahi@eos.ncsu.edu (B.P Asahi) writes:
:dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) sez:
:
:>The term is "kissing" not "fucking".  
:
:When I see a picture of two butt-naked homos frenching each other, it 
:doesn't matter whether they're kissing or fucking. It's still repulsive. 

So simple, so economical, you need not even think.

:>I have to view heterosexuals kissing
:>everywhere, in all sorts of media.  Why do I have to look at this?
:
:How many publicly-displayed pictures of butt-naked heterosexual couples 
:have you seen ? 

Thousands.  Watch TV?  You'll see more.  If you count kissing=fucking,
and you do, you could go on *forever*.  And I'm sure you will.

: In how many of these pictures were they fucking on a bed ? 

Lots.  Remove your Official Strayt Blingfold and you might see
them.

:>We put up with heterosexuality everywhere.  You could try to put up
:>with homosexuality.
:
:If putting up with homosexuality means having to look at butt-naked homos
:fucking each other, then I think I'll pass.

I am not surprised.  



     Donn Pedro ...................{uunet, sequent, pn400}!uswnvg!dfpedro.