HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Romantic Love or a Cure for Cancer (was Re: "want" vs "need" )
Date: 10 Sep 92 08:58:02 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki, Finland

In <1992Sep10.033007.27641@csi.uottawa.ca> misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel) writes:

>In article <kiran.715949040@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>, kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:

>> Well gee Mark, if _I_ had a choice between having a happy relationship
>> and finding a cure for cancer, I know which one I would choose.  
>> I'd choose the one that would make me happier.

>   So would I.  Finding a cure for cancer would make me happier.

If you found a cure for cancer you would be an international hero.  You
would meet a lot of nice people (and even more people who want to ride
with your success).  There would be a good chance that you would find a
SO too.  So, by choosing cure of cancer you would almost choose both. :)

Juha

-- 
Juha Taina | taina@cs.helsinki.fi | Phone: +358-0-708-4247
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: "try becoming obsessed with..."
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 03:19:49 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Sep13.200007.4925@csi.uottawa.ca> misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel) writes:
>In article <JMD.92Sep10105050@lion.bear.com>, jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:
>> Note that I said "try getting involved in... ".  I did not say "try
>> becoming obsessed with..." :-) :-) :-)
>   I've tried.
>   Dancing, for example.  In Septembers of 3 years, I joined a ballroom
>dance club.  (I've also taken a few lessons in ballet, renaissance,
>and jazz dancing.)  I never got obsessed with it.
>   The result?  I never got good at it.

Mark- you're sadly confusing 'obsession' with 'desire'.
Obsession means something that you want to do, be with, whatever, night and
day- all the time, the only thing you can think about it dancing dancing dancing
and your entire life is devoted to the study of dance. Thats obsession.
Desire is something you do because you want to do it.

You never had the desire to learn dancing, it was just something that you
were doing. That's why you ended up dancing by rote (left foot here, right foot
there) instead of just 'letting go', enjoying yourself and picking up precise
technique...later.

Its a lot like, believe it or not (and this is for the programming types out
there :) learning how to program. I can teach somebody the basic steps involved
in programming without to much difficulty. But Programming by rote is like
Dancing by rote- sure all the steps are there, but you look really silly doing
it. And, like dancing, the best coders I've seen make it look so easy- there is
a 'natural flow' in how they code. Dance breaks down that way (well, formal
dance does). When you're coding you think 'Oh, a loop goes here' and don't worry
about the direct mechanics of the loop. When dancing, think 'Oh, that little
spin move thingy goes here' instead of 'I gotta put, lesee, right foot, step,
left foot, spin? was that it?'. So you don't get the 'little spin move thingy'
exactly right. So? Do you worry when you mis-place a semi-colon in a loop? No-
because as you get better at coding, the mechanics of a loop are automatically
filled out in your head as you go through that section of code, just as when
you getter better at dance, the mechanics of that 'little spin move thingy'
become automatic. See- being a programming dweeb does have its advantages :)

r.
From: wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Ring for sale (The ballad of a Guy & Girl)
Date: 11 Sep 92 23:34:17 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford, NY
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

ANNE@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU wrote:
: In article <4149@moscom.UUCP>, wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien) says:
: >You could probably trade Broward for his baseball bat, wherever he wandered
: >off to...
: >
: >Ever notice how occasionally people just vanish?  Spooky...
: 
: Broward too???!!!  I'm shocked!  NOw that I'm barely out of recovery following
: my deep withdrawal from Dan Mocsny's departure, I'm hit with this.
: 
: Medic!!
: 
: (Dutton, you'd better not be leaving too.  I just may have to shoot myself.)

Maybe you missed, and hit Broward?  No, wait, that'd need a time machine...
hmmmm... relativistic bullets?
-- 
"Bless me, Father; I ate a lizard."
"Was it an abstinence day, and was it artificially prepared?"
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Subject: Re: What knockers!  Crreak.
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 18:16:33 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.025433.429@peponi.wcc.govt.nz> parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz writes:
>Help me out here, guys (and girls).
>
>I've had guys stick their elbows out purposely to brush my tits as I walk past. 
>How can they possibly get off on elbow contact?  The last I heard the elbow was
>not an erogenous zone and it's rather painful to collide with one with your
>spongy bits!

They're sadists, who are getting off on your pain.  Remember that the brain
is the primary erogenous zone.

-- Herb Huston


Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: Re: chemistry / love at first sight : fact or fiction?
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 09:55:11 GMT

In <!mrnbrq.aahz@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:

>In article <1992Sep8.035506.24811@csi.uottawa.ca> misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel) writes:
>>In article <1992Sep7.022243.29268@peponi.wcc.govt.nz>, parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz (Rachel) writes:
>>
>>> I'm beginning to think there *is* no such thing as love at first sight.
>>
>>   Would you *want* to love someone whom you knew nothing about?  Why?

>Don't you believe in telepathy?

	I heard a very interesting comment on Love at first sight last
night which I thought was very clever.  The guy said that it was in fact
a form of Narcissism. You can't possibly know what the object of your
desires is *really* like so you project onto them all the qualities that
you admire or lack in yourself.  The other person then becomes the 
epitome of all you want them to be.  That made sense to me. How about
you?
 
    ____________________________________________________________________
    |   Emma Williams            | Folk sover ellers ikke godt op      |
    |   ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie    | ad en sultan tiger!                 |
    |				 |    Steen og Stoffer :->             |
    |____________________________|_____________________________________|
From: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Wolf Park? (was Re: Desperation)
Date: 14 Sep 92 19:54:51 GMT
Organization: Indiana University

rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink) writes:
>kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>> rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink) writes:
>> >Alas, the knockout blonde grad assistant that worked there didn't
>> >have any similar interest :-) 

>> Oh, bummer.  Did you nibble at the corners of her mouth?

>*Her* mouth?  Oh.  I was trying to suckup to the wolf pups first :-)

By nibbling at the corners of her mouth you would have been
demonstrating your thorough knowledge of the byzantine subtleties of
wolf behavior.  Of course, you might not have liked the meal she
would've proceeded to feed you....

>Y'know, like trying to get along with your date's pet yap dog.

I wouldn't date anyone with a yap dog.  I have _some_ principles, ya know.

>yip yip. yip yip yip. yip yip.  yip yip yip.  OW!!  <whack!>

Yukko.  Strangle the damn thing.

(One of the many nice things about wolves is that they don't bark.)



-- 
Kiran Wagle <kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Can we can the suck-up bit?
Date: 11 Sep 92 18:35:50 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <72268@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>>>Tits are the less-than-a-handful kind, and gazongas are the kind that 
>>>qualify as a blunt instrument if wielded properly.
>
>>S'ok Stef - Size doesn't matter.
>>             I can't believe nobody else jumped on that one...
>
>Probably because they were afraid that a classificiation scheme of penis 
>sizes would be next. 
 
What's there to be afraid of?

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: wtr@mitre.org (Bill Ralston)
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:29:39 GMT

liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:

>For dresses and skirts I don't seem to have a problem although it sure 
>looks like a lot of leg sticking out beneath some of my minis sometimes! 

Thank you! thank you!  [for reducing me to a drooling nerd, that is :) ]

Bill
---------------
wtr@mitre.org
** Opinions are mine only, and not my employer's **
From: wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
Date: 12 Sep 92 04:56:39 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford, NY
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Glenn Clapp (gclapp@javelin.sim.es.com) wrote:
: In article <Bu7H2I.CKF@tik.vtt.fi> pekka@tmt.tele.fi (Pekka Ahonen) writes:
: >There are also tall men (and women!) in Finland. I think that I'm
: >about the average height (or perhaps a bit short) 183 cm.
: >
: Any of them have US visas?

What, American Express and Mastercard aren't good enough for you?
-- 
"Bless me, Father; I ate a lizard."
"Was it an abstinence day, and was it artificially prepared?"
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Stupid Newsgroup
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 16:02:46 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Sep1.222201.12237@tamsun.tamu.edu> peram@cs.tamu.edu (Suresh B Peram) writes:

>	This newsgroup has become really stupid,
>	and mundane.  It used to be that you would 
>	find gems of advice here, no more.

We're really sorry we didn't sufficiently entertain you, and thank
you for sharing your kind and generous gems of wisdom - NOT!

>	Hope you people think before you post your
>	junk.

Like you did?

Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving
But how can they know it's time for them to go?		- Sandy Denny
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: hays@TECHNET.NM.ORG (Larry 'Purple' Hays)
Subject: Re: Can we can the suck-up bit?
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 21:08:51 GMT
Organization: New Mexico Technet   Albuquerque, NM
Reply-To: hays@TECHNET.NM.ORG

In article <72206@apple.Apple.COM>, stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:

>Using a friend's classification of mammary size (tits, breasts, boobs, 
>and gazongas), mine are breasts. 

>Tits are the less-than-a-handful kind, and gazongas are the kind that 
>qualify as a blunt instrument if wielded properly.

S'ok Stef - Size doesn't matter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry 'Purple' Hays                                    hays@technet.nm.org

             I can't believe nobody else jumped on that one...
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Subject: Re: Cradle Robbin?
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 01:39:40 GMT

In <lasi5hINN8r4@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
><nose in air, snotty sniff>  I will ignore any scandalous and unfounded 
>accusations, thank you very much.  My sweetheart is 26.

In article <29134@hydra.Helsinki.FI> taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina) writes:
>He was born in 1966?  1966 was a very good year. :)

In article <1992Sep10.130616.29257@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>Oh yes, give me those elevens!  1955 has my vote ...  :-)

In article <5221@news.duke.edu> infante@acpub.duke.edu (Andrew  Infante) writes:
>I prefer '69 myself...

Objectively speaking, 1928, 1940, 1952, 1964, and 1976 are the best years.
Those are all the Year of the Dragon.  And what a particular delicassy it is
to find one who also happens to be a Scorpio.  Now those are truly 1 in a 144.
From: bart@muppet.bt.co.uk (Tim)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Heinlein
Date: 14 Sep 92 16:20:04 GMT
Reply-To: bart@muppet.bt.co.uk
Organization: British Telecom

In article 4206@moscom.UUCP, wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien) writes:
>Mark Israel (misrael@csi.uottawa.ca) wrote:
>: In article <5177@news.duke.edu>, diamond@acpub.duke.edu (Elizabeth Abrams) writes:
>: >> Pardon my ignorance; who are the Howard Family?
>: >
>: > Oh.  Sorry.  It's a Heinlein reference... 
>: 
>:    Which book?  I've only read _Stranger in a Strange Land_.
>
>_Time Enough For Love_, mostly.  Worth the read.  I thought you had to read at
>least 5 books by Heinlein before you were allowed to post here, though...

God help us all then. All the Heinlein I ever read, apart from the odd short story
was like having your eyes sucked out.

Dare I say pedestrian narrative ? Soporific definitely.

Tim
---
The harvest of life, the harvest of death	<-- bart@muppet.bt.co.uk -->
Resumes it's course each day			<--     Tim Fulcher      -->
It comes as if by schedule			<--  tel : 0473 648220   -->	
The harvester lives, with arms that are bent	
And toes that cross, and knees that jerk	<-- British Telecom Labs -->
And necks like swans that seem to turn
As if inclined to gasp for breath...	- Quicklime Girl - , BOC
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Can we can the suck-up bit?
Date: 8 Sep 92 23:15:06 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:

>Frasier, a lion, was the equivalent of an 80-year-old man when he arrived
>at Lion Country Safari in 1971 and the keepers, as a joke, placed him with
>a pride of lionesses who had already rejected some young lions.  Someone
>forgot to tell Frasier, though.  The lionesses began chewing his food for
>him (he was almost toothless), and two would press against each side of his
>body when he tried to take a walk.  Frasier, the Sensuous Lion, sired 35 cubs
>in 16 months and was voted Father of the Year in a congressional resolution.

Geez Louise....Steve Garvey got smeared nationally for this kind of stuff! The
moral? Be A Furry Animal.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh | "As an advocate of reason, egoism and capitalism,
jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu  |  I seek to reach the men of the intellect - wherever
      "N.I.N.A."        |  such may still be found."                [Ayn Rand]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kevin@nuchat.sccsi.com (Kevin Brown)
Subject: Re: What knockers!  Crreak.
Organization: I can't see any in the immediate vicinity...
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 07:10:07 GMT

[On the idea that the elbows are included in one's erogenous zone...]

In article <1992Sep11.224907.10444@fid.morgan.com> sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>In article <18r6rtINN4ia@skat.usc.edu> tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy)
>writes:
>>Gee Seth,
>>	With all of your intimate knowledge of the female body and everything
>>else for that matter, why don't you start documenting your fabulous life and
>>either write a best seller, or for those of us with less exciting lives, maybe
>>a weekly magazine.
>
>Well, if knowing that the elbow can be quite erogenous translates (in
>your mind) to such "intimate knowledge of the female body", then you
>need more information than can fit in a book.  I'd recommend that you
>start with a clue.

Yeah, but if he gets a clue, he won't have a life!  The two are mutually
exclusive, you know.  :-)

Then again, he may not have a life right now anyway, so perhaps he'd be
better off getting a clue...

>Seth		sethb@fid.morgan.com


-- 
				Kevin Brown

			    kevin@nuchat.sccsi.com
			    kevin@taronga.taronga.com
From: wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Intelligence vs Smart Alec (Was: Various ramblings...)
Date: 11 Sep 92 23:29:45 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford, NY
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Herb Huston (huston@access.digex.com) wrote:
: In article <MARTINC.92Sep6184723@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
: >Nope, we haven't had a draft since the mid 70's.
: 
: Speak for yourself.  I had two with lunch just today.  Nothing like a couple
: of cold ones with a stacked ham and cheese.

Hunh.  I'd rather have two warm ones on a stacked... uh... never mind.
-- 
"Bless me, Father; I ate a lizard."
"Was it an abstinence day, and was it artificially prepared?"
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com
From: swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Where the best posts come from
Date: 14 Sep 92 23:48:15 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: UB

In article <lb9fp9INN5um@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>> 
>>Dawns happily married now. She's got it BAD.
>
>I'm WHAT!!!??!  Damn, I knew I should have been paying more attention when
>my folks showed up with that shotgun.  Too bad -- I really wanted to meet
>his parents before we made a commitment because there's a rumor going 
>around that they're really cthulhu-descended lovecraftian monsters.  Today
>it's hairlessness and weird fingernails -- tomorrow it's full blown scales
>and tentacles.    

Well, Alice better watch out about picking on any younger siblings
that might come of this union.  I mean, being devoured by a formless
monster from beyond space is probably not something that most big
sisters have to worry about.  I think.

-- 
Steve Swann                 |    Speak to me in many voices; make
swann@acsu.buffalo.edu      |      them all sound like one...  -BOC
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 02:08:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.162939.29487@linus.mitre.org> wtr@mitre.org (Bill Ralston) writes:
>liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:
>
>>For dresses and skirts I don't seem to have a problem although it sure 
>>looks like a lot of leg sticking out beneath some of my minis sometimes! 
>
>Thank you! thank you!  [for reducing me to a drooling nerd, that is :) ]

GIF! GIF! GIF!  (Hundreds of Lurker Feet stomping on the background) GIF!
GIF! ...
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Fall classes have started
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:26:13 GMT
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: ron@turing.toronto.edu's message of 15 Sep 92 15:54:13 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.115413.16611@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:

   Hi.  My name is Ron, and I have a question for this board.  Why is it that
   women always prefer jerks to us nice guys?  Every time I've gotten involved
   with someone, she always leaves me for some other guy who treats her really
   rotten.  Why is that?

   And they always seem to be older guys, too.  I don't understand that.
   Everyone knows us younger guys have more stamina than those old fogeys.
   They're well past their prime and are going senile.

   So anyway, does anyone have any idea where I can meet women?  Do singles
   bars work?  I don't seem to be meeting any new people.  Anyone have any
   suggestions?

   And once I meet someone, what should I say?  What sort of opening lines
   work well?  Guys, what lines have worked for you?  And how about you
   girls ... what lines worked well on you?

   Anyway, I'm a SWM 32 ISO SWF for companionship and possible relationship.
   Email me if you're interested.  Thanks.

The best part is that having started *ALL* the repeat threads all at
once, we can hope that all we have to kill is one chain....
--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am he who walks the States with a barb'd tongue, questioning every
one I meet,/Who are you that wanted only to be told what you knew
before?/ Who are you that wanted only a book to join you in your
nonsense?"  _Leaves of Grass_ xxiii.4.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel)
Subject: "try becoming obsessed with..."
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Ottawa
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 20:00:07 GMT

In article <JMD.92Sep10105050@lion.bear.com>, jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:

> Note that I said "try getting involved in... ".  I did not say "try
> becoming obsessed with..." :-) :-) :-)

   I've tried.

   Dancing, for example.  In Septembers of 3 years, I joined a ballroom
dance club.  (I've also taken a few lessons in ballet, renaissance,
and jazz dancing.)  I never got obsessed with it.

   The result?  I never got good at it.

   It took all my concentration even to *approximate* the correct
footwork.  I couldn't hold a decent conversation with my dance partner.
And I tripped over her feet so much that I hardly made a favourable
impression on her.

   I had a friend who *was* good at dancing, and he got *lots* of
dates at the dance club.

   To become good at dancing, I *would* have to become obsessed
with it.  (Yes, I'm slower than average at learning such things.)

   Back to square one. :-(

   (Dances seem to be *very* popular with singles here in Ottawa.
6 out of the 6 "singles events" listed in Friday's paper were
dances.)

misrael@csi.uottawa.ca			Mark Israel
Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.
From: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Desperation (was Re: Commitment--The C-word?)
Date: 10 Sep 92 01:50:47 GMT
 <ewillims.715600678@unix1.tcd.ie> <1992Sep9.071115.446@dmpe.csiro.au>,<ewillims.716025009@unix1.tcd.ie>
Reply-To: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Organization: Wellington City Council, Wgtn, NZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: blade.wcc.govt.nz

In article <ewillims.716025009@unix1.tcd.ie>, ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:

>hormones (pheronomes).  Presumably, you would be releasing them in
>abundance if you have just had sex and therefore would attract others
>to the smell without them realising why.  Moose do it!  Why do you 
>think theyr put musk in perfumes and aftershaves! ;>

I always thought I must be weird not liking musk, but I'm just not attracted to
moose.  






Rachel

"Supergoof"

   - -
   O O
    >
   \_/






Rachel

"Supergoof"

   - -
Newsgroups: soc.singles