HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: I3150101@dbstu1.rz.tu-bs.de (Benedikt Rosenau)
Subject: Re: A nation chosen by GOD -- New-Israel
Organization: Technical University Braunschweig, Germany
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 12:32:56 GMT

In article <5JAN199319431894@utarlg.uta.edu>
b645zaw@utarlg.uta.edu (General Inspiracy) writes:
 
>Before GOD all are equal. Worldly governments are *not* instituted
>by GOD. Such are my beliefs, and this... that no sin is any worse
>than any other -- thus all of us, (the users and the used), are
>equally lacking before GOD.
 
I think I recall a lot of Bible quotes which say that people are NOT equal
before god. Like the chosen people stuff. And I don't care about any
unprovable metaphysical pseudoequality that does not affect real life.
    Benedikt
 
>How can any of us escape the chains which bind each -- especially
>the shortness of one's own life, or the meager size of one's own
>brain? As human beings each has a limited consciousness -- even by
>drawing on 6000 years of written history, or all the logic of
>science and philosophy -- we still look through the lens of our own
>individual brief awareness: the weakest link. Yet some choose to
>think that they have it all figured out, seeing no need to try just
>simply loving GOD.
>
 
Assuming that I want to escape the chains. And that other tools are not good
doesn't make your tool valid. To be more correct, there is no way for you to
communicable validate your tool. And that is the region why so many don't care
for it.
 
Anyway, how about you are too pride to see that Krishna is God?
Prove me wrong. Or leave me alone.
 
The fancy point is, that you think that you have it all figured out. Science
for instance does not say so. And as opposed to science, you even are too
arrogant to make statements that can be checked.
 
And cut out the preaching,
   Benedikt
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13720 talk.politics.misc:66239 alt.activism.d:4419 misc.legal:22051
From: mstaben@comtch.spk.wa.us (Matthew Staben)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,alt.activism.d,misc.legal,alt.pol
Subject: Re: Weinberger's Pardon
Date: 5 Jan 93 01:07:24 GMT
Organization: Waffle BBS at CompuTech Spokane, Washington

niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent) writes:

> In article <1992Dec31.134027.25084@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> jlinder@magnus.
> 
> >But aren't we talking about foreign policy though?  Besides the ability
> >to declare war, what foreign policy powers are given to Congress in the
> >Constitution?  If there are none, passing laws restricting the FP powers
> >of the executive branch would seem to me to be unconstitional.
> 
> Um, *what* foreign policy powers of the executive branch?  The president
> is commander in chief of the armed forces, and he is allowed to make
> treaties and appoint ambassadors with the advice and consent of the Senate.
> 
> He may also receive ambassadors.
> 
> That's it.
 
The President of the United States, by definition, indeed does *not* have
any foreign policy powers, but realistically, his powers are vast.  
Lyndon B. Johnson's cabinet saw to that.

> As to impeaching Reagan, it is virtually impossible to prove he *knew*
> about the illegalities, since North, et al, said they were operating
> without his knowledge.  If it had been any other president, he probably
> would have been impeached, but it was actually believable that Reagan
> didn't know what the executive branch was doing.  It was actually
> believable that Reagan didn't know what planet he was on, too, of course.
> 
 
On the same vein as before, Reagan is the second president since LBJ to
actually exponentially increase the powers of the office *successfully*,
and this includes the powers to evade congressional investigative 
committees.  
 
Wasn't it kind of funny how, when Clinton was first elected, and he went 
from being an anti-bush-politician to a bush-is-alright-politician post 
their meeting.  Hmm?  Methinks Bush told Clinton some baaaad news!
 
> -- 
> David M. Nieporent   | Is it too early to start making predictions for 1993?
> niepornt@phoenix.    | Probably, but that never stopped me before.
>    princeton.edu     | ALE: Baltimore ALW: Chicago NLE: Montreal NLW: Atlanta
> Baltimore Orioles 93 | AL MVP: Cal Ripken  AL Cy Young: Mike Mussina


mstaben@comtch.spk.wa.us
 
[Made in America]
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13775 soc.culture.jewish:24634 talk.politics.misc:66425
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.jewish,talk.politics.misc
Subject: CANADA: Montreal Synagogues Painted With Swastikas
From: kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay)
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 93 16:24:13 GMT
Reply-To: kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca
Followup-To: alt.conspiracy
Organization: The Old Frog's Almanac, Vancouver Island, CANADA
Keywords: Montreal

File: /u/pd0/text.fascism/montreal.0193
Source: The Province, January 5, 1993

SYNAGOGUES PAINTED WITH RED SWASTIKAS

--------------------------
United Press International
--------------------------

MONTREAL - Seven synagogues in the Montreal area were painted with swastikas
and covered with anti-Semitic slogans, over the weekend.

Some buildings had swastikas spray-painted in red on the exterior, and some
carried the message `Juden raus', which is German for `Jews out', said Jack
Jedwab, director of community relations for Quebec of the Canadian Jewish
Congress.

"One possibility is that this series of incidents was perpetrated by
neo-Nazi skinheads or members of the neo-Nazi movement," Jedwab said
yesterday.

"We think it was an organized attack," he added.

The incident was the first anti-Semitic attack against Montreal's
95,000-member Jewish community in more than two years.

Given the anti-Semitic and racist violence in Germany and other European
countries over the past year, Jedwab said Montreal's synagogues were very
fortunate to have been so lightly hit.

==30==



-- 
The Old Frog's Almanac - Public Access UseNet for Central Vancouver Island
     (604) 245-3205 (v32) (604) 245-4366 (2400x4) SCO XENIX 2.3.2 GT 
 Ladysmith, British Columbia, CANADA. Just south of Tupperware Central...  
                 Information is power - get connected
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13740 talk.politics.misc:66294
From: mbevan@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Mark Bevan)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: MKULTRA and Lee Harvey Oswald
Keywords: MKULTRA JFK Lee Harvey Oswald
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 93 01:43:08 MST
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #1, Edmonton, AB, Canada

lggidden@eos.ncsu.edu (LARRY GRANT GIDDENS) writes:

- 
- Lee Harvey Oswald was supposily one of the participants of the MKULTRA CIA
- experiments to use LSD to control the american citizens.  Mebbe he got a 
- hold of some bad stuff and that casued him to go crazy and assassinate JFK.

......and maybe he didn't even do it.... what a concept?

--
Mark Bevan              mbevan@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca 
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.italian,talk.religion.misc
From: pierce@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Brad Pierce)
Subject: Re: The Origin of Western Thinking Process
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 06:07:14 GMT

In article <1993Jan12.030057.21565@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> mb2p@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Marco  Bertamini) writes:

>By showing that Christianity is a lie you have not
>proved that there was a political purpose behind it.
>You need more evidence. Please post your ideas on
>alt.conspiracy-theory.

The name of the newsgroup is "alt.conspiracy".

-- Brad Pierce --


Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc
From: "James F. Tims" <p00168@psilink.com>
Subject: Re: _Jesus: A Life_ by A.N. Wilson
Organization: Performance Systems Int'l
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:06:56 GMT
X-Mailer: PSILink (3.2)

>FROM:   Ron Hogan <rhogan@phakt.usc.edu>
>
[...]
>
>So, can a large highly organized crowd shout in unison or not?
>
>And how large does a crowd have to be before it needs organization
>in order to shout in unison?

One leatherlung does great with about 25000 cooperative people. 
Ever been to a big football game?  The trick is if everybody can see the 
leader.  If not, the precision of cooperation is a function of the speed 
of sound -> time it takes for the most distant members to hear one another.
A normally packed (a standard public demonstration organized around or 
in front of a point -- the Pope addressing the crowds at the Vatican, 
e.g.) of about 5000 people (if memory serves; probably doesn't) can 
coordinate handclapping in as few as three claps, never more than 5.  If 
there are strong echos, as in a theater, even smaller groups fail to 
coordinate.  Chanting to the rhythm of handclapping or a drums is as old 
as anyone cares to go back.

-jim

Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren)
Subject: Re: STATUE OF IMMIGRATION
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 01:40:41 GMT

arf@ddsw1.mcs.com (Jack Schmidling) writes:

##and a beautiful poem it is.  She was Jewish you know.

#  I wonder how beautiful you would think it was if written by, 
#  let's say a goose-stepping German.  Or how bout a nice 
#  Moslem Arab?  Somehow I suspect, it never would have made it 
#  to the Statue of Immigration.

Arfie must be a quadratic function. Regardless of the starting
point of the debate, he always converges quickly to the global
minimum.

-Danny Keren.

Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,talk.politics.misc
From: dave@tygra.Michigan.COM (David Conrad)
Subject: Re: A nation chosen by GOD -- New-Israel
Organization: CAT-TALK Conferencing System
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 11:32:51 GMT
Keywords: No argument, you win.

In article <2JAN199301540090@utarlg.uta.edu> b645zaw@utarlg.uta.edu (General Dentistry) writes:
>In article <C03D79.682@ecf.toronto.edu>, 
>vanweer@ecf.toronto.edu (VANWEERDENBURG NICHOLAS JOHN) writes...
>
>And my opinion is that GOD doesn't care about non-entities, such as 
>governments, education, churches, fads, and the like... only individual
>people, each directly and individually. 
>
>>Lets see.  The United States and God.  Did your god support slavery and then
>>change his mind ( and very slowly, from the Civil War up to Martin Luther King
>>and Malcom X, over almost 100 years! )?
>
>Slavery is another non-entity. Why would GOD care?
>
>>Does your god support Vietnam, Cambodia, El Salvador?
>
>more n-e's
>

Hmm.  A god who doesn't care about "moral" infractions.  Or perhaps your
god thinks enslaving people and killing people is an okay thing to do for
these individuals He/She/It is concerned with?

David R. Conrad
-- 
=  CAT-TALK Conferencing Network, Computer Conferencing and File Archive      =
-  1-313-882-2209, 300bps-14400bps, V.32/V.32bis/TurboPEP New users use 'new' - 
=  as a login id.  AVAILABLE VIA PC-PURSUIT!!! (City code "MIDET")            =
   E-MAIL Address: dave@Michigan.COM
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13834 talk.politics.misc:66663 alt.activism.d:4445 misc.legal:22174 alt.politics.bush:15688 alt.president.clinton:1405
From: jaskew@spam.ua.oz (Joseph Askew)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,alt.activism.d,misc.legal,alt.politics.bush,alt.president.clinton
Subject: Re: Weinberger's Pardon
Summary: Yes he did
Date: 8 Jan 93 01:52:48 GMT
Organization: Statistics, Pure & Applied Mathematics, University of Adelaide

In article <randall.726350080@seashore> randall@informix.com (Randall Rhea) writes:
>pjm@anegada.sps.mot.com (Patrick J. McGuinness) writes:

>>Actually, FDR's greater violation of law and Congressional intent was
>>his support of Great Britain prior to our involvement in WWII, which
>>violated the Neutrality Act.

>FDR supported Britain legally through the Lend-Lease Act.   He did not
>run a covert war against Germany contrary to the wishes of Congress.

Yes he did. There were numerous 'incidents' between US Naval vessels
and Germans U-Boats preceeding the German declaration of war. Indeed
the reason cited by Hitler for declaring war on the US was that 'they
are already sinking our ships' (from memory but essentially correct)
Roosevelt and Churchill had reached an agreement (predating war) that
the US would escort British convoys across the Western half of the
Atlantic where they would be handed over to British ships. This naturally
lead to shooting between German and US Naval vessels. Some of these
incidents were started by the Germans although usually provoked (*), but
in at least some cases the US Naval vessel would either attack unprovoked
or interfered with a German UBoat going about it's lawful business (ie
torpedoing British ships). In short Roosevelt *did* run a covert war
against Germany contrary to the wishes of Congress (and this was implicitly
acknowledged to a Congressional Inquiry after the War)

(*) In at least one case a US Naval vessel shadowed a German sub and
radioed it's position to British Bombers who repeatedly attacked the
sub. After 3 1/2 hours of this the Sub fired what might have been a
warning shot (it missed badly and there was only one). The US Vessel
then proceded to try and sink the Sub.


Joseph Askew


-- 
Joseph Askew, Gauche and Proud  Barbarian horns draw out the northern wind;
jaskew@spam.maths.adelaide.edu  Paler than water lies the Thistle Pass;
Disclaimer? Sue, see if I care  Sky swallows up the road to Kokonor;
One China One Korea One Eire32  Moonlight, a thousand miles along the Wall.
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13741 alt.activism:20064 talk.politics.misc:66296
From: cj195@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Bo Gritz
Date: 5 Jan 1993 18:52:35 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cj195@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, cmort@NCoast.ORG (Christopher Morton) says:

>As quoted from <1i8t6hINNc4m@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> by cj195@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs):
>
>> 
>> Does anyone out there know what is happening with Bo Gritz since the
>> election?  If you can share anything with me, please send me email.
>
>Maybe the "black (multinational) helicopters" came to get him on December
>19th.... 
>
>Sorry, just couldn't help myself.  Just LOVE a good looney conspiracy 
>theory.... :)

This is the typical pap, passing for humor but utterly devoid of
information, I normally get from critics of conspiracy theory.  Since
they have nothing to refute with, they make fun of.

Notice I said nothing about conspiracy in my original post.  All I did
was ask for information about a man.  If this is typical tactics of
those who oppose Gritz--and it is--maybe we should pay closer attention
to what he is saying?



 






-- 
--------- All my opinions are tentative pending further data. ---------
------------- John W. Redelfs, cj195@cleveland.Freenet.edu ------------


Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc
From: b645zaw@utarlg.uta.edu (=white ribbon=)
Subject: Re: _Jesus: A Life_ by A.N. Wilson
Organization: University of Texas at Arlington
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 00:03:10 GMT

In article <C0G7Lo.4GE.1@cs.cmu.edu>, tp0x+@cs.cmu.edu (Thomas Price) writes...
>In article <1993Jan1.203913.12465@engage.pko.dec.com> 
>pub@riscee.pko.dec.com (Publius) writes:
>>
>>>      ... By unfairly blaming the Jews, the Gospel stories 
>>>      precipitated 2,000 years of Christian antisemitism.
>>>
>>
>>The Gospel stories never blame the Jews for the condemnation of Jesus.
>>Gospels blame the Roman-appointed high priest for that crime.  Anyone
>>who has the slightest idea of the history knows that the high priests in
>>that period were Roman puppets hated by the rabbis and the Jewish populace.
>>By equating the high priest with the Jews, the critics have exposed their own
>>total ignorance of the history.
> 
>Matthew 27:24-25
> 
>	When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather 
>	a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the 
>	multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person:
>	see ye to it. Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be
>	on us, and on our children.
> 

Matthew 26:27-28

	And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying,
	Drink ye all of it;

	For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many
	for the remission of sins.

Matthew 26:42

	He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying,
	O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me,
	except *I* drink of it, *thy* will be done.

Matthew 26:56 

	But all this was done, that the scriptures of the
	prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples
	forsook him and fled.

Matthew 27:50

	Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice,
	yielded up the ghost.

Matthew 28:18-20

	And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All
	power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

	Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing
	them in the name of the Father, and of the Son,
	and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe
	all things whatsoever I have commanded you:

	  and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the
	  end of the world. 

Amen.
	 

   |
-- J --
   |
   |  Stephen   

Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc
From: tp0x+@cs.cmu.edu (Thomas Price)
Subject: Re: _Jesus: A Life_ by A.N. Wilson
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 20:25:03 GMT

(someone)
>: >   "+ Jesus' prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane, asking God to spare
>: >      him from the cup of death but nonetheless bowing to God's will,
>: >      is a literary creation. If Jesus prayed while his disciples
>: >      slept, who jotted down a transcript of the conversation?"

(me)
>: An alternative explanation is divine inspiration, which is supposedly the
>: method of composition of the book. Consequently, this observation is
>: not independently significant: it is subordinate to the result of inquiry
>: about inspiration, and can add nothing nor take anything away from
>: that debate.

(MM)
>Ah yes, devine inspiration.  The method where people can expound with 
>authority concerning events about which they know nothing.  The NT is full 
>of them.
>Mike McAngus 

I think you're out of line here. I don't believe in divine inspiration,
but I was pointing out that it is an invalid criticism for someone to
draw attention to the fact that none of the gospel writers could have
directly witnessed Jesus' silent prayers etc., and think that this is 
a conclusive argument against the accuracy of the NT. Christians claim 
that they have an explanation: any conclusive arguments must attack that
explanation directly.

I don't see that you've added anything to the thread by taking the
opportunity to mock the idea of inspiration. Your opinion, though I
share it, is irrelevant here. 


      Tom Price   |    tp0x@cs.cmu.edu   |   Free will? What free will? 
 *****************************************************************************
  plutoniumsurveillanceterroristCIAassassinationIranContrawirefraudcryptology


Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: hurd@fraser.sfu.ca (Peter L. Hurd)
Subject: Re: CROP CIRCLES
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 01:59:48 GMT

jbm@hal.trl.OZ.AU (Jacques Guy) writes:
>bungle@cellar.org (Sir Charles of Manson) writes:


>>Can anyone tell me about Crop Circles?
>>Don't be shy.  Flood my box with mail.
>>I am ready.

>Ah, yes, time to air my pet theory again (must be
>the second or third time in 18 months).

>Wheat, you see, after millions of years of natural
>evolution, and thousands of years of selective
>breeding by Man, has become sentient, and is trying
>to communicate with us.

HA HA HA,

The CBC, (Canadian Broadcasting Corp)'s science show _Quirks and Quarks_ 
did a piece on crop circles this summer (I think).  The show (Sorry it
must've been a year ago, since I think it was the big teasers of 1991 in
science) basically boiled down to that there are two kinds of crop
circles, man-made and weird ones.  The weird ones were characterized by
low level radiation or bizzare unstable elements (I forget). I found this
to be an annoying punchline, since I'd rather believe that they are made
by pranksters than falling space junk or whatever.

I think this is more of a science weirdness topic than a conspiracy one,
anyone have more info on the Q&Q show or other non-tabloid info?
-- 
Pete Hurd, hurd@sfu.ca| Q: Why did the Jungle Fowl cross the road?          |
Behavioural Ecology   | A: To maximize it's lifetime reproductive success   |
Dept.Biol.Sci., SFU.  | Q: Huh?                                             |
Burnaby B.C., Canada  | A: I guess it just needed to get to the other side. |
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,talk.politics.misc
From: amanda@rana.usc.edu (Amanda Bischoff)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.bush,alt.president.clinton
Subject: Re: Execute Amy Fisher!!!
Date: 8 Jan 1993 11:13:25 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: rana.usc.edu

In article <1993Jan8.162320.17278@news.acns.nwu.edu> dmeier@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Douglas Meier) writes:
>In article <1993Jan8.150808.6452@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu
>(Simon E. Booth) writes:
>>
>>Need I say more?  We've got to do something about murderers!
....stuff deleted.....
>crime is now running rampant here.  Ferchrissakes!  Fisher beats a woman over
>the head with a gun, shoots her, and she's going to spend a few scant years in
>a cell and come out MAKING MONEY on the deal. 
>
>And who says crime doesn't pay......
Actually, in some states (NY included) a criminal cannot make
money off a televised documentation of his/her story.  As I
understand it, Amy didn't get any gratuity from it.

I do agree, though, that are penalties need to be stiffened.
Plus, the other problem is we need to re-educate those who are
incarcerated, or get them psychiatric care, so that when they
leave prison they are capable of contributing to society.

Amanda


Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13699 talk.politics.misc:66201 alt.activism.d:4414 misc.legal:22030 alt.politics.bush:15482 alt.president.clinton:1336
From: fsars@acad3.alaska.edu (Allen R. Sparks)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,alt.activism.d,misc.legal,alt.politics.bush,alt.president.clinton
Subject: Re: Weinberger's Pardon
Date: 4 Jan 93 19:43:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: acad3.4JAN199311431532
Organization: University of Alaska - Fairbanks
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41.UAC

In article <1993Jan4.012508.21495@holos0.uucp>, lbr@holos0.uucp (Len Reed) writes:
> In article <1992Dec31.164944.9552@eff.org> mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin) writes:
>>In article <bhayden.725782011@teal> Bruce Hayden, bhayden@teal.csn.org
>>writes:
>>>>
>>>>Lying to Congress has a long history. Presidents of both parties have
>>>>done it as a matter of course. If you criminalize that, you would have
>>>>to put FDR, JFK, and LBJ at the head of the list....
>>[much omitted]  (I take it you omitted Nixon for a reason?)
> 
> Can't count him--he was pardoned. :-)

Of course, the reason Nixon wasn't mentioned is because that person
was replying to a post that did nothing but mention Nixon and Reagan.
=== Al
From: spl@ivem.ucsd.edu (Steve Lamont)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Reply to Marc Talbot #2
Date: 6 Jan 1993 14:43:50 GMT
Organization: University of Calif., San Diego/Microscopy and Imaging Resource
NNTP-Posting-Host: ivem.ucsd.edu

In article <1993Jan6.041700.17143@nuscc.nus.sg> matmcinn@nuscc.nus.sg (.) writes:
>spl@ivem.ucsd.edu (Steve Lamont) writes:
>: In article <lkk1afINN95j@news.bbn.com> ingria@BBN.COM writes:
>: >In article <1i8bsgINN29q@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> kar5@po.CWRU.Edu (Kevin A. Roll) writes:
>: >   So why the hell didn't they kill HIM to shut him up???
>: >
>: >That's just the sort of question THEY want you to ask...
>: 
>: He's dead, isn't he?  Do we *really* know it was through "natural
>: causes?"
>: 
>Who told you he's dead?

Paul McCartney.

							spl
-- 
Steve Lamont, SciViGuy -- (619) 534-7968 -- spl@szechuan.ucsd.edu
UCSD Microscopy and Imaging Resource/UCSD Med School/La Jolla, CA 92093-0608
"Personally, I don't care whether someone is cool enough to quote Doug
Gwyn--I only care whether Doug Gwyn is cool enough to quote." - Larry Wall
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy