From: chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney)
Subject: Errors in the Astro_Boy AI Program (was Re: Inturdgent whines about media bias (Was: King/Astro Boy?)
Organization: California State University Sacramento
Distribution: world 
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:26:49 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.143758.4661@nas.nasa.gov> dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King) writes:
>
>In article <1992Sep1.202240.11972@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>
>My guess is that this post came from Inturdgent himself.  
>Notice once again he fails to be able to spell intelligence:
>>The debate is
>>because of the many intellegence bugs within the Astro_Boy AI
>>program...

Egads I'm cooked now. Astro_Boy comes complete with a Spelling
Checker module as a defense. How will anyone ever defeat that weapon? 
 
>I have never denied that the media is biased against pro-lifers.
>I just said I enjoy to hear your whining about it, as if you should
>have fair representation.  For a bunch of raving fetus fanatics,
>I personally think the media gives you much more attention than
>your cause warrants.  I'm sure groups such as the KKK and the 
>American Nazi party are unhappy with their media coverage.  But 
>thats the price you pay when you support crazed fringe movements.
>You have every right to say what you want, you have no right to an
>audience to preach to.

The media has every business giving coverage to a movement who, as the
USA Today results after April 5, shows, is more in the MAINSTREAM than
the pro-aborts. That movement is the pro-life movement, of course.
Even USA Today had to admit that, so reality is probably even worse
for the pro-aborts. 

Do you want to see that USA Today issue or do we want to admit that
what you said up there, was a bunch of bullshit? 
(Which is consistent with all the OTHER output coming from
Astro_Boy.)

>You are also confused Inturdgent, it is you that lost the challenge.

Joke! Astro_Boy now malprocesses, literally spewing out the inverse of
its own data! 

>I have told you on a number of occasions not to worry about the
>100 bucks you owe.  I am aware how long it would take to save up that
>kind of money on your paper route and if you go to your parents for
>the money, who knows, they may cut you out of that inheritance that
>is so important to you.  You got any little brothers or sisters who
>would get thrilled to tears if your parents cut you out?  Kind of 
>heart warming and all to see you get so thrilled your brother and
>parents don't get along, cause that means more inheritance for you.

But hey, AI program viruses like yourself have no such thing as an
inheritance. Wait... you do have an inheritance - a reserved spot in
the junkheap when someone invents a better AI monster for USENET.

>Is that what your republican cronies meant by family values?

Astro Boy once again lost his data on a high-noise line. 

It never recalled how much I dislike Quayle and that I am a Democrat.

>I actually admire the Rush-man.  He took what was a one note joke 
>and turned it into an enterprise.  He took his joke and convinced a
>bunch of pre-adolescent little boys to follow him.  Listening to him
>lately, he seems to have forgotten its a joke though.  It sounds
>like all his little followers have convinced him to lead.  I 
>guess you didn't realize Rush is a joke.  

Oh, yeah, and we're practically falling out of our asses when one of
Gloria Steinem's burning bra's causes her carpet to catch on fire.

That's about the only headline that gets her MS. Magazine high sales. 

>So you took me out of your kill file.  What happened to your claim
>that you only run and hide from the strongest?  Are you now
>retracting that claim, or are there others stronger than me that
>you wanted to put in your kill file?

Fool. I only battle the strongest. Remember that? It's in my .sig
every now and then. Of course, you COULD argue that my .sig said "I
only run and hide from the strongest," but then that would prove to
the world that you are indeed having enormous AI data errors and in
addition, there may be a user programming outrageous fantasies into
your program, to boot. 

In short: Get that AI error fixed before it's too late.
 
>Speaking of retractions, I notice you are no longer lying about 
>your parents system administrator, Mr. Smith, contacting me.  How
>come you stopped lying about that?

Lying? I said he said he got e-mail from YOU, from NASA, and that it
got so bad he got sick and tired of it and told you to BUG OFF.
 


=============================================================================
>##       "My logic is based on ... a religious perspective which says
>##  that personhood begins at birth (actually a month after birth if
>##  we want to be precise)..."
>##    -- Gloria Feldt,
>##       chief executive, Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona

>##   "I see nothing extreme or reprehensible about this statement."
>##     -- garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) <BtnDAw.Iwo.2@cs.cmu.edu>
=============================================================================
|Pro-Contraception   Pro-Freedom of Religion, Speech & Sexual Orientation   |
|Pro-Privacy    Pro-Humanism   Pro-Freedom of Choice 	Registered Democrat | 
|                                                                           |
|			Card-carrying member, NRLC                          |
|           Dedicated to achieving civil rights for the unborn              |
=============================================================================
BBBBBB     OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    Founder: Steve Chaney 
B    B     O      O   S         S          <chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu> 
BBBBBBBB   O     OO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    
BB     B   O     OO        SS        SS    Borg Operating 
BBBBBBBB O OOOOOOOO O SSSSSSS O SSSSSSS O  Space Systems, Revision 2.0 

	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 
Newsgroups: talk.abortion