HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ckashuba@chimi.ucdavis.edu (Chris Kashuba)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Norton Desktop
Date: 11 Apr 92 19:42:45 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering - University of California - Davis


	I'm having a problem with Norton Desktop. When I run Windows I get
a UAE so I changed the shell=ndw.exe statement in the system.ini file to
shell=progman.exe. Now Windows will run, but not ndw if I invoke from
the file manager. 
	The first time a got the UAE  I ran scheck  on the Stacker drive
and it told me there were errors in win386.swp. So I deleted it like instructed
Was this file created by NDW? If so it should not be swapping on the 
compressed drive but on the uncompressed portion. If win386.swp was created
by Windows or NDW how do I change it to be created on d: (uncompressed) and
not in the \windows directory on c:?

					Thanks,
						Chris Kashuba

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: claude@spc9.jpl.nasa.gov (Claude A. Felizardo)
Subject: NDW 2.0 - is it worth it?
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 07:53:40 GMT

I was running the Norton Desktop for Windows under 3.0 until I upgraded to
3.1 this last week.  I was very disapointed with its slugish performance and
in fact, had disabled the automatic save.

It seems to me that a lot of the new features in 3.1 make NDW 1.0 partially
redundant.  Is NDW 2.0 worth the upgrade?  Do you have to order direct from
Symantec or will they send out upgrade notices?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Claude A. Felizardo           Jet Propulsion Laboratory, M/S:525-3684
claude@spc6.jpl.nasa.gov      4800 Oak Grove Dr,  Pasadena, CA  91109
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn)
Subject: Re: W4W 2.0 & Excel Printing Problems
Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:18:33 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.210901.7462@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> drv@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dennis.r.vogel) writes:
/>> >> If you don't have Excel 3.0a, you should call MS and get the free upgrade
/>> >> from 3.0. It will solve all your printing problems.
/>> >> 
/>> > Thanks for the suggestion but I fail to see how upgrading
/>> > Excel will solve Word for Windows problems.  Please elaborate.
/>> 
/>> It's obviously a holistic approach :->
/>> (Or, they meant WFW 2.0a, which also solves some printing problems)
/>
/>Oh, I see!  I hadn't thought of that!  Just to clear things up
/>a bit more, I have Word 2.0a so maybe there's something to the
/>original claim being holistic enough so an Excel upgrade fixes
/>Word problems.  Stranger things have happened.
/>
/>Dennis R. Vogel

Actually the holistic comment is not too far off.  Many of Microsoft's apps
are starting to share a lot of the same code and, hence, if a new app
contains a new and improved dll, then all of the apps will benefit.

--
Donald A. Lehn, Ph.D.                      Phone: (301) 496-2885
Bldg.37 Rm 3D20                            FAX:   (301) 496-8419
National Cancer Institute / NIH            Email: donnel@helix.nih.gov
Bethesda MD 20892
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: shapiro@trade.enet.dec.com (Steve Shapiro)
Subject: W3.0 'feature'
Organisation: SKS Computer Consulting, Inc.
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Marlboro, MA
Date:  8 APR 92 16:55:40 EST


I received my W3.1 upgrade on the 6th. Nice enough but I didn't have any time
to install it, so I decided to wait until this next weekened. 

So, the next day (7th), I turn on the trusty PC, I get the Windows logo screen,
then it blanks and I get the hourglass and then it blanks and then I am
deposited at DOS!!

Well, how interesting I thought, thinking that not only were they releasing 3.1
on the 6th, but 3.0 drops dead on the 7th. 8-)

Well, I tried restarting it with WIN and WIN /3 with the same results. I tried
WIN /S and the whole system hung. I then rebooted and tried WIN /R and this
worked. I got into Windows in real mode. I then immediately exited windows and
tried to do WIN /3 again. And what do you know? It worked! 

Have any of you had a similar experience like this or is it just me?

Regards,
Steve.

/*********************************************************************
*                               *                                    *
* Steve Shapiro                 * All views and opinions expressed   *
* SKS Computer Consulting, Inc. * are my own and do not neccessarily *
* Specializing in:              * reflect those of my clients,       *
* DEC/VAX/VMS/ULTRIX, Unix & PC * employers or employees             *
*                               *                                    *
**********************************************************************
* Steve.Shapiro@f440.n101.z1.fidonet.org                             *
* FidoNet 1:101/440 (508) 664-6354                                   *
* The Contract Professional BBS, North Reading, MA                   *
*********************************************************************/
From: thomas@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Thomas Plass)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win 3.1 hangs
Date: 16 Apr 92 10:17:58 GMT
	<1992Apr15.161902.1199@Comtech.com>
Reply-To: thomas@uk.ac.ed.cogsci
Distribution: comp
Organization: Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh
In-reply-to: aga@Comtech.com's message of 15 Apr 92 16:19:02 GMT

{memory parity error in 3.1}

Alan,

this following advice is given in my best intention. But, just like
GNU software, it comes with no warranty whatsoever, (cf. COPYING). If
your machine explodes, don't [b|f]lame me.

I cured my parity error problem by changing the memory configuration
on the motherboard. Consult your manual to find out if there are
provisions that allow you to do so (e.g. DIP switch). In my case, the
board is now configured for 4 banks of memory although only 2 banks
are filled. I am surprised that the machine boots up at all. However,
if it is good enough for 3.1 then it is good enough for me, too.

Since altering the setting I havent't had a single memory parity
error, in Windows or in DOS.


Sincerely hope this helps,

th.

--
Thomas Plass                                    | University of Edinburgh
Fax:   +44 31 650 4587                          | Centre for Cognitive Science
ARPA:  thomas%cogsci.ed.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk| 2 Buccleuch Place
JANET: thomas@uk.ac.ed.cogsci                   | Edinburgh EH8 9LW Scotland
From: klug@Software.Mitel.COM (Peter Klug)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: A note on Norton Desktop 2.0
Date: 15 Apr 92 23:21:31 GMT
Organization: Mitel Corporation; Kanata, Ontario, Canada
In-reply-to: kumarr@hparc0.aus.hp.com's message of 10 Apr 92 03:18:31 GMT


On a related note...  Currently I'm running Windows 3.0 and Norton
1.0.  I'll shortly be getting Windows 3.1.  Are there any gotchas in
ungrading this configuration?  Do I just upgrade Windows and life
continues as before but with all of 3.1's new features?  Or will I
have to reinstall Norton over top of the upgraded Windows (in which
case my Norton configurations will probably be gone)?  For that
matter, does anyone know whether or not Norton 1.0 is still fully
compatible with Windows 3.1?  Any advice on this will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Peter


--
*        Peter Klug         *  Peter_Klug@Mitel.COM
*     Mitel Corporation     *  
*  Kanata, Ontario, Canada  *  Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: rubin@visual1.jhuapl.edu (Don Rubin)
Subject: Win 3.1 Trident 1024x768 woes
Reply-To: rubin@visual1.jhuapl.edu (Don Rubin)
Organization: Johns Hopkins Univ APL
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 17:42:03 GMT

Don't get too excited about using the "new" Trident
drivers under Win 3.1 upon examining the dates of
the files only the OEMSETUP.INF, README and one
driver are from 1992. ALL the rest date back to 
March 1991!

Needless to say I have trouble using these "new"
drivers under win 3.1.  As a beta site I was using
these drivers fine (1024x768 16 color and 256 color)
Much to my disappointment they don't work so well 
with commercial Win 3.1

The OEMSETUP expects 7 windows disks (my distribution
has 6). Mouse movement makes the screen go crazy. I
plan to call Trident tech support and complain but
I wanted to pass along the news before you all waste
time loading these "new" drivers. Regards...

-- 
Don Rubin, Consultant
Johns Hopkins University APL
rubin@procon.jhuapl.edu
(301)953-6386 or (301)588-8010
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim)
Subject: Re: Number of OS/2 2.0 orders (was Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works)
Organization: Harvey Mudd College
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 23:34:27 GMT

mmshah@im.lcs.mit.edu (Milan Shah) writes:

>>OS/2 hasn't been released for 14 days and there are
>>already 2,000,000 orders for the program (mostly Windows 3.0 owners BTW).

>Not to offend anyone, but I bet that number is skewed. Simple Math. IBM 
>has been taking orders through their 800 number (I believe that's the only
>place you can order it as of now) for about 10 days. That boils down to
>about 200,000 orders / day. Assuming 10 hr days, that's 333 orders/min.
>Assuming an order takes about 10 minutes to take, it would imply IBM has
>about 3,000 people taking orders.

This assumes each caller only buys one copy.  I'd bet most of the
orders so far are from corporate customers, who (1) don't have to
go through the 800 number, and (2) if they did go through the 800
number, would order large quantities at once.

Despite this, I still find the 2e6 figure hard to believe as well.
-- 
John H. Kim                 | (This space to be filled when I
jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu | think of something very clever 
uunet!jarthur!jokim         | to use as a disclaimer)
From: rfs0838@zeus.tamu.edu (SCHAFFTER, RODNEY FRANK, JR)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: When DR scams, it's ok? Was Re: Win3.1/DR DOS 6.0/SuperS
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:17:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <11329@mindlink.bc.ca>, Robert_Salesas@mindlink.bc.ca (Robert Salesas) writes...

>I'm not talking about "version" checking.  That makes sense.  This is PRODUCT
>checking.  SSTOR doesn't run because it's MS-DOS, not because it is MS-DOS
>v5.0.  That's a big difference.

	Are you sure it is not version checking?  Has anyone tried SSTOR with
DR-DOS 5.0? 

	As I previously posted, I accedently tried to run MS-DOS 3.31 XCOPY
under DR-DOS 6.0(which presene itself as DOS 3.31 if an application checks)
and it didn't run. Was this a Microsoft plot?? No, I think it was a difference
in the I/O methods that each uses.

Best Regards,
Rod Schaffter                                 	
Laboratory for Molecular Structure and Bonding	|Who cares if windows is or 
Texas A&M University Dept. of Chemistry		|isn't an opperating system-
Bitnet:   SCHAFFTER@TAMLMSB			|it barely operates at all!
INTERNET: SCHAFFTER@LMSBVX.TAMU.EDU		|
	"Standard Disclaimer, etc."		|An OOPerating system, maybe?
From: s9100786@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au (Matthew Jackson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Trident 8900C drivers for 3.1
Date: 16 Apr 92 14:04:12 +1000
Organization: University of New South Wales

Does anyone know if there are Windows 3.1 drivers for a Trident 8900C SVGA
card available yet ?

If so, are they on an FTP site somewhere ? Calling a BBS number is not an
option because a) the number's bound to be in the USA (too expensive) and
b) I don't have access to a modem .

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Matthew Jackson                       |
Computing Officer                     | Why didn't Noah swat those two
School of Banking and Finance         | mosquitoes ?
University of New South Wales         |
Australia                             |
s9100786@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au       |
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: eagle@catt.ncsu.edu (Daniel L'Hommedieu)
Subject: Windows NT - is it a Unix "remix"?
Reply-To: eagle@catt.ncsu.edu (Daniel L'Hommedieu)
Organization: NCSU CATT Program
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 01:13:44 GMT

From what I have read of NT, it sounds as if Microsoft wants to reinvent
Unix.  NT, from what I have seen...er, read...seems to be Mach with a
Windows API on it, instead of NeXTstep (referencing the NeXT, of
course).

The system requirements for NT are very comparable to Unix for Intel,
near as I can tell.  Sure it's hefty, but Unix _is_ powerful.

Where can I get further information on NT?  

Daniel
--
Daniel L'Hommedieu / CSC Major, NC State U, on the 6-year plan :) 
Internet: eagle@{catt.ncsu.edu,Salzo.Cary.NC.US,grunt.Berkeley.edu}
10215 Hanover Glen Road / Charlotte NC 28210 / 704-541-5116
"Windows 3.1 is Microsoft's $50 bug-fix to Windows 3.0."-JWL
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: linville@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (John W. Linville)
Subject: Re: Why I hate [insert here] (this newsgroup)
Organization: NCSU CATT Prog  
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:03:51 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.081622.1@bigez> dmmatt@bigez (Mike Mattix) writes:
>this newsgroup are using Windows not OS/2.  I for one have an extremely good
>reason for it, it supports my network (DECs Pathworks) and OS/2 V2.0 does not.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't DEC Pathworks just a repackaged Microsoft
LAN Manager?  If so, then LAN Manager does run under OS/2, as does IBM LAN
Server, which is based on LAN Manager.  For that matter, I believe I read
somewhere that DEC has Pathworks for OS/2, although I am not sure about that.

I apologize for using this newsgroup to discuss a better OS^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H OS/2, but I just wanted to set the record straight, if possible on the point
above.

John W. Linville





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  John W. Linville                Amateur radio:  KD4KHC                  |
|  #include "std_disclaimer.h"     E-mail:  linville@catt.ncsu.edu         |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bh419@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ted B Samsel)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: driver for PANASONIC PKX1123
Date: 6 Apr 92 13:08:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr6.130852.18306
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)


What is a (or whjere is a ) driver that can use ATM on a PANASONIC
PKX1123?
  Thanks
-- 
Ted
From: thomasg@epx.hscs.umn.edu (Thomas Gasser)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: How to move TrueType fonts (long)
Summary: Hints on moving TT fonts to the directory of your choice
Keywords: Windows 3.1 TrueType fonts
Date: 17 Apr 92 16:00:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: epx.thomasg.507
Organization: Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota

I love Windows but this is CRAZY! Microsoft if you monitor this groups 
please come up with a better solution.

In article <1992Apr17.042055.17081@techbook.com> pkwong@techbook.com (Phil Wong) writes:

>If you're the type of person who likes an organized Windows 3.1 directory
>structure, then this tip might be of interest to you.

>As you may have noticed, the Windows setup routine places all the TrueType
>(TT) fonts into the directory \WINDOWS\SYSTEM.  Not only does this make for
>a crowded directory and long listings, it's also messy from an organization

(much stuff deleted)

>    Summary (after copying files):

>       In WIN.INI, each TrueType font reference points to its matching
>       .FOT file in \TTFONTS.

>       Each .FOT file in \TTFONTS points to its corresponding .TTF file
>       in \TTFONTS.

>       The .FOT files in \WINDOWS\SYSTEM are no longer needed.



*********************************************************************
*  Thomas D. Gasser                                                 *
*  Department of Neurosurgery                *******     ******     *
*  University of Minnesota                    ***  *** *** ***      *
*  (612) 624-4427                             ***   *****  ***      *
*  E-Mail:  THOMASG@EPX.HSCS.UMN.EDU         *****        *****     *
*                                                                   *
*********************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: cjwein@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Chris J. Wein)
Subject: S3 or ATI Ultra/Vantage
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:48:46 GMT

I am looking to upgrade to a new video card and am considering either 
an S3 based card (probably the Stealth or Wind/X) or one of the two
ATI cards.  Which do you recommend?  I know a good deal about the ATI
cards but not so much about the S3 cards.  What about the S3's drivers,
regular VGA speed etc.? 

If you reply by mail to save bandwidth, I will summarize the results.
-- 
==============================================================================
 Chris Wein                           | cjwein@watcgl.waterloo.edu 
 Computer Graphics Lab, CS Dept.      | cjwein@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca
 University of Waterloo               | (519) 888-4548 
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith)
Subject: Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 22:07:45 GMT

moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore) writes:
>
>Will OS/2 run my DOS games in a box? (or at all?)

Yes.  Absolutely.  In fact, you can run bootable games (older games
that use their own boot disks) under OS/2.  You can't do that under
Windows.

Does 2 copies of Wing Commander 2 running simultaneously in 2
different DOS boxes mean anything to you?
From: kumarr@hparc0.aus.hp.com (Kumar Rangan)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:18:31 GMT
Subject: Re: A note on Norton Desktop 2.0
Organization: the edge of the world : HP New Zealand
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms

> / *MaintainerMisgNet* <AXH113@psuvm.psu.edu> /  5:13 am  Mar 22, 1992 /

>I am planning to make the desktop somewhat look like a Macintosh desktop.
>(I can't afford a good Mac although I like them) Someone suggested Norton
>Desktop to me. I want to know how good ND is and if possible, I would like
>suggestions from netters on what I can do to make the desktop look like a
>mac destop.

If u're still deciding, I'd suggest you read the April 92 issue of Windows 
USER. It has some good articles comparing Norton Desktop & HP NewWave.

|  Kumar Rangan                Internet   : kumarr@hparc0.aus.hp.com        |
|  PSO, HP Wellington          HP Desk    : Kumar Rangan/HP9781/01          |
|  New Zealand                 Tel# : +64 4 382 0400, Fax# : +64 4 384 3380 |
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: mmshah@im.lcs.mit.edu (Milan Shah)
Subject: Win 3.1 - WOW! & install tip
Organization: MIT Lab for Computer Science
Distribution: comp
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 19:51:29 GMT


I post this for two reasons - one, because Windows 3.1 just left skid marks
on my desk when it accelerated from 0 to 60 in 0.0 seconds, and secondly, I
wanted to introduce an install tip.

First, I must vent. Win 3.1 is fast. No, its faaaaaaaast! I have a $99 Paradise
SVGA card (probably the most basic you can buy) and Windows 3.1 just snaps.
I use the DOS box quite often, and under win 3.0, the dos box screens would
update so slowly that sometimes I used to bring out my slide rule and help it
along. Now, its instantaneous (on my 20 MHz 386). More objectively, I ran 
checkit inside a windowed DOS box, and it gave me 7000 chars/sec speed; under
Win 3.0, it used to be 1100 chars/sec. Believe me you, its fast. Its fantastic.

Ok, now for the customary "useful" tip to justify the bandwidth:

When installing, don't choose the "upgrade" option. Win 3.1 setup detected
that I had win 3.0 and asked if I wanted to upgrade. If you want to you simply
hit enter; if you don't you type in a new directory into which to install
win 3.1. I bet all the problems being reported here are because people had
mucked around so much with their windows 3.0 setup (and its absolutely not
their fault, if you installed OEM drivers for anything, they really screw
around with the setup.inf file). So, just install 3.1 afresh, and then work
in all the other drivers one by one - it'll be much easier.

This approach will also get around the problem people are noticing where win
3.1 setup does not update the old drivers. The reason you want a fresh install
is that often, you might not need the old drivers any more. For example, I
have a Genius White Mouse on its own bus port. Genius provided a special
mouse driver for win 3.0. On the Win 3.1 install, I simply selected Mouse
Systems Mouse on Com2 or other, and the thing works like a charm. Had I chosen
to upgrade win 3.0, it would have continued to use the old driver. Similarly
for my SVGA driver. Win 3.1 has a built in SVGA 800x600x16 driver - try it,
(but be prepared to get your fingertips burnt when win 3.1 blazes onto your
 screen!)

Oh, I love the smell of burnt rubber...

Enjoy! 

Milan
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: dorsai@iear.arts.rpi.edu (gregory d moncreaff)
Subject: 60sec limit in sound recorder
Organization: the committee for asethetic deletions
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 08:04:20 GMT

does anyone know how to get around this limit? the manual says
its linked to available memory. i have 8MB physical and 16MB
virtual. i cannot understand what keeps me from being able
to record lengths upto 10minutes given my configuration. can 
anyone shed some light on this?

by limit i mean that no matter if i have 600k free before
starting windows and run only program manager and sound
recorder i am limited to recording only upto 60 seconds.
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger)
Subject: Re: more bugs in 3.1exit
Organization: Schlumberger Technologies, ATE division, San Jose, Ca.
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 20:38:14 GMT

copleyd@physc1.byu.edu writes:
: In article <1992Apr15.145813.12588@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald) writes:
: > 
: > More bugs:
: > 
: > 1) a bad one: the clock appears to only run once, no multiple copies,
: >    and, far worse, you can't make it the active window by clicking
: >    just anywhere on it - you have to use the "move bar" area.
: >    Whoever at microsoft that did this, it was dumb.
: 
: Hmmm... that's odd.  clicking anywhere on my Windows 3.1 clock makes it the
: active windows...
: 
: As for multiple copies... I guess you could do what is suggested in PC
: Magazine and run many copies of Windows 3.0's clock.  I've noticed that you
: can't get multiple copies of File Manager either.
: 

I can't seem to understand why one would need more than one clock anyway.
Stereo time?

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             Voice: (408)437-5254  FAX: (408)437-5246
Organization: Freshman, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 18:59:34 -0400 
From: Carl B Jabido <cj00+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: MS/HP win Apple suit!

Hey, and we have a trashcan for Win 3.1 too!!
From: sarnold@bgsu.edu (G. Steve Arnold)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win 3.1: mouse.sy_ and mouse.co_, how to decompress?
Date: 11 Apr 92 18:37:12 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.

kadie@herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie) writes:
>>I did a custom instillation and the new mouse drivers did not get
>>copied over. I've found them on disk #4, but can't figure out how to
>>decompress them. Help.

> The solution is to use the compress.exe program (which is on my
> harddrive in the windows directory even though I don't see
> it on any of the diskettes.)

	The program is either decomp.exe or expand.exe (different MS
program packages will use either...) and is on DISK #1 of the WIN3.1
installation set. Copy the mouse drivers to a temporary dir on your HD
along with the decomression program and type the name of the decom-
pression program to get instructions for use.

steve

-- 
   The only difference between a Communist        G. Steve Arnold
   and a Socialist is that the Socialist will     Dept. Math and Stats.
   only confiscate the resources that are         BGSU
   profitable.                                    sarnold@andy.bgsu.edu
                        "Keep circulating the tapes"
From: bollard@hpspkla.spk.hp.com (Lee M. Bollard)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 14:30:28 GMT
Subject: Win 3.1 install warnings
Organization: Hewlett Packard Company, Spokane, Wa.