HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ken@mizar.tcs.com (Ken Emery)
Subject: Re: Flex-IP, SCO, Netports, and Castells
Organization: Teknekron Communications Inc.
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 16:28:43 GMT

In article <199208271954.AA09686@huxley.bitstream.com> Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET> writes:
>>Has anyone used the printer gateway features of Flex-IP
>>with Intel Netport or Castell Lanport boxes? How about
>>with SCO Unix? Any experiences would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
stuff deleted
>
>It would be nice if there were a HP Laserjet filter available.  Choices are
>None, Lineprinter, and Postscript.  Set to Postscript for the Laserwriters,
>you have control over banner pages, form feeds, etc.  Set to Lineprinter
>for the HP's, you can't disable the banner page, but you get correct
>printouts.  Set to None for the HPs, you can disable the banner page, but
>you get no line feeds with your carriage returns.  Maybe additional playing
>around will get us no banners with correct CR/LF.
>
You can configure the laserjet to change a CR into a CR/LF via an 
escape sequence (don't remember which one right now).
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dave Maupin              Bitstream, Inc.        (617)497-1403 x614
>uunet!huxley!davem       215 First Street
>davem@bitstream.com      Cambridge, MA 02142

bye,
ken emery
internet: ken@tcs.com

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 26 Aug 1992 13:00:00 LCL
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         RRAWSON <RRAWSON@NOVELL.COM>
Subject:      Re: bk asks about using the C
X-To:         Access Inc <NOVELL@suvm.acs.syr.EDU>

1. Get the NetWare C Libraries
2. You should use the scan bindery call iteratively to match "*" and set
   object type to USER (I think USER is 0x0001).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: gretchen@cco.caltech.edu (Gretchen Millendore)
Subject: BTRIEVE QUESTION
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 18:26:34 GMT

I have Novell 3.11 and have installed Btrieve 5.15 on the server.  I am not
very familiar with Btrieve, and now that one of the programmers in my 
company is trying to program using Btrieve, I don't know how to help her.
She is trying to use the function BTRV() and of course when she compiles
the call is unresolved external...  I am not very strong in terms of
programming, so be easy on me.  Where is the file "MSCXBTRV.C" located??
I have only one Btrieve disk labelled "Services and Utilities"  Any help
would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Gretchen Mullendore
gretchen@cco.caltech.edu

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.LUT; 28 AUG 92 15:54:58 BST
X-Mailer:    ELM [version 2.3 PL0 (LUT)]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 15:53:46 BST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         OBSchou <O.B.Schou@LUT.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: Help needed: RPL+DOS5+ODI+IBM E-net/a. (Long)

I asked some time ago:

> > We need to get 40 IBM PS/2-55/LEO systems (hard disk less,
> > ethernetted) booting MS-DOS5 and ODI from a file server.


and got a reply from Brian Cassidy (BPC@UNB.CA):

> If we are talking 3.11 then I can help. Get a document from
> Novell Inc called "Remote Program Load on NetWare 3.x".
> Also get an associated diskette with the following files:
> RPL.NLM - Server remote boot NLM specifically designed to
>           work with IBM ethernet, PC NET, and token ring adapters.
>           This NLM supports wild cards in bootconf.sys and
>           multiple boot images per node. It claims to work with
>           the IBM Lan Support Program. RPLFIX and RPLODI are
>           no longer required!
> ETHER.RPL - For IBM MCA ethernet adapters
> F1ETH.RPL - For IBM Model 25sx ethernet adapters
> PCN2L.RPL - For IBM PC NET adapters (broadband and baseband)
> RBOOT.RPL - For adapters using the Novell Boot ROM kit
>             Anyone know if SMCs latest boot roms (ROM-RPL) support this?
> TOKEN.RPL - For IBM token ring adapters
>
> The RPL modules go in the SYS:LOGIN directory.
>
> The SMCPLUS ODI driver works for me. I dont know what IBMODISH is.
> Here are my config, autoexec and net.cfg.



(NET.CFG, AUTOEXEC.BAT, CONFIG.SYS sample omitted).

Well, the advice given above solved All Known RPL+DOS5+ODI problems,
when used with the latest ODIUP? etc files.

We have now got 42 PS/2-55/LEO, 12 Olivetti M28+NE1000 (WIT BOOT ROMS
FROM 1988!), Olivetti M280 with Reasearch Machines E-Net, 22Vig with
SMC ELITE PLUS, Olivetti PCS with RML card.  All work, and I had to
change NO roms at all.

For those that have helped us through this traumatic time, especially
Brian, (whom I cannot mail directly), and SUNS (Salford UK), my sincere
thanks!  Now for my summer hols...

Bertil Schou.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 08:45:08 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
From:         "Loreen E. Lacy" <LIBEM029@SIVM.BITNET>
Subject:      error 0

From: Loreen E. Lacy
      SI Libraries  NHB 26A
      (202) 357-1940
We seem to be having a recurring problem in WP. When the users try and save
files, they get an "error 0" message and the file seems to be saved, but it
isn't. This happens randomly and on several different machines. It has
happened on a 386 Dell and on IBM PS/2 286 machines. We are running NW 3.11 on
a 486 Dell, WP office shell and various versions of DOS. Any light shed on
this subject would be appreciated.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 So much Star Trek....so little time...........................
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 12:11:34 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         yusuf <YUSUF@EMUNIVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      check

  Hi everybody.
  Is it possible view the screen of other workstation in my machine?We have
  20 workstation and a fileserver.we are running with Nw3.11

  thanks in advance
   Yusuf Kucuk
   Eastern Mediterranean University
   Computer Center
   Cyprus
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Novell, Inc., San Jose, California
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 10:26:50 PDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(don provan)" <donp@NOVELL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Internet Services

In article <9208312237.AA20782@la.sjf.novell.com> you write:
>Novell is looking for ways to improve on the services offered to its customers
>via the Internet.  For that reason, I am posting this message requesting any
>input you might have as to how better the Internet user might be served.
>Please include specific information about the FTP server, technical expertise
>offered via the listserv, etc.

To start with, we could set up some well known mail aliases like
support@novell.com, info@novell.com, and others mail aliases like
that.  Actually, there's already a support@novell.com and an
info@novell.com, but since i've never heard them announced in public,
i assume they're left over from some bygone era.  If i knew i could
forward any support questions i get to support@novell.com and have a
reasonable chance of them being read and answered by someone, it'd
sure make my life a lot easier....

This almost goes without saying, but of course you should make sure to
announce the plan publically once it's in place, but, more
importantly, is to keep people aware of them.  Probably the easiest
way to do the latter is to have the return address on posts and mailed
answers be the appropriate mail aliases instead of a personal account.

Good luck!  All of us that "support" the Internet informally are
rooting for you!
						don provan
						donp@novell.com
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Monday, 31 Aug 1992 09:28:32 CDT
From: Satish Movva <U37127@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Re: OS/2 V2.0 Requestor

In article <IO80734.920828153704@maine.maine.EDU>, "Daniel M. Maunz"
<IO80734@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> says:
>
>    To Whom just asked, (I deleted the message before getting the ID..)
>    The requestor/utilities for version 2.0 of OS/2 can be FTP'd from
>    ftp.ucs.ubc.ca in the novell directory files: OS2NWREQ.EXE,
>    OS2NWUT1.EXE and OS2NWUT2.EXE. These are self extracting disk
>    images provided by IBM I believe. - Dan
Pardon me if I am wrong, but I thought you had to pay novell to get this
stuff, albeit a nominal price of $30.00 for a corporate license...


Satish Movva                                 Bitnet: U37127@UICVM
Academic Computer Center                   Internet: u37127@uicvm.uic.edu
University of Illinois at Chicago                    satish@satish.cc.uic.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 09:21:24 EDT
Reply-To:     GBOS@datacom.ccs.uoguelph.ca
From:         Gerrit Bos <GBOS@CCS.UOGUELPH.CA>
Subject:      Re: Remote Boot DOS5.0 problems
X-To:         i13@CS-ACAD-LAN.LAKEHEADU.CA, novell@suvm.bitnet

>
>>Recently i stumbled into an unexpected problem.
>
>>We have quite some experience with Remote Boot under DOS3.3.
>>Following the usual DOS3.3-procedure to make a NET$DOS.SYS, but this
>>time using DOS5.0 instead of DOS3.3, produced a bootfile that hangs my PC.
>>I tried both the conventional (IPX,NETX) and the ODI way. Both work fine
>>if booted from floppy disk but hang in a remote boot situation when using
>>DOS5.0.
>>The result is PC-hardware independent.
>>I tried with both NE1000 and NE2000.
>
>>Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
>
>>Henk Tanger
>>MBL-TNO
>>Holland.
>
>Don't worry, you're not alone.  I've stuggled with this problem for about 3
>months, and 4 hours a day!  I'm using NetWare 2.2, and IBM token ring, but
>that doesn't matter... You're just going to have to wait until Novell gets
>IPX working properly.  L8r.
>
I've just run into the same problem, and there is a fix.  It is called
RPLFIX.  There is a version of RPLFIX on the WSGEN diskette, but there
is an updated version on netlab2.usu.edu in novlib/05   (You may also be
able to get it a Eurpoean site somewhere.
--- S - h - o - r - t -   - S - i - g - n - a - t - u - r - e - : - ) ---
Gerrit Bos  Systems Analyst, Data Comm, Comp & Comm Services, U of Guelph
            Guelph ON Canada N1G 2W1 (519)824-4120x3489 Fax:(519)763-1620
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 09:02:08 -0700
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         steve@WINTERMUTE.UCSD.EDU
Subject:      Re: Idle daemon wanted
X-To:         Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL%SUVM.BITNET@VM.USC.EDU>
              03 Sep 92 12:10:00 GMT." <9209031132.AA15183@ucsd.edu>

Actually, what I  would like is a way to avoid going to
the monitor console and clearing a connection.
Does novell allow you to get info about idle time to begin with?

Steve Misrack
steve@ucsd.edu
UCSD Network Operations
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:      UK.AC.QUB.V2; 31 AUG 92 11:02:45 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 31 Aug 1992 11:02:00 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         GRG1678@VAX2.QUEENS-BELFAST.AC.UK
Subject:      RE: Followup on DougMenu.

The latest version of Dougmenu is 1.68 as found on wuarchive: the author notes
that it has a fix to correct a problem with DOS environment variables but
otherwise there is no change from 1.67.

Tony Sheehan
grg1678@v2.qub.ac.uk

Queen's University, Belfast
Northern Ireland
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: VAXF::IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 31 Aug 1992 09:48:13 -0600
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "RALPH NEWBY - INTERNET (RALPH@OJC.COLORADO.EDU)"
              <RALPH@OJC.COLORADO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: AutoBoot Problem - Where to Put NET$DOS.SYS

Thanks so much for the responses to my autoboot problem. I tried it first
thing this morning and it works great!!!!!


Ralph Newby
ralph@ojc.colorado.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%suvm.bitnet::novell
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 13:34:00 MDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         SL7GJ@USU.BITNET
Subject: WD8003E -- HELP!! - More stuff: Motherboard problem???
From: sl7gj@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
Subject: WD8003E -- HELP!! - And More:  Motherboard problem???
Date: 2 Sep 92 13:32:09 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

Hi once again...
        I just had a flash of inspiration (?), and wanted to bounce it off
all of you fellow netters...  With respect to my problems with the Western
Digital cards, the cause may not be the card at all, but the computer itself.
The computer we are trying to install the card in is put out under the
GECCO (sp?) name.  I know that they are a low-end computer, and would like
to know if anyone else has had problems with them.  I would hate to be
beating my brains out on this problem when it is not the card at all...
        I have tried another working card in the computer, with the same
errors...  (Please see earlier posting: "WD8003E -- HELP!! - More Information"
for the full context of my problem.)  Once again, ANY help at all would be
appreciated!!  Please let me know of any problems (or success) that you have
had with this brand of computer.
--
==============================================================================
Rick C. Larkin                       Utah State University
Systems Analyst/Programmer           Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept.
Internet:  SL7GJ@cc.usu.edu
Bitnet:    SL7GJ@usu.bitnet
Fax:       (801) 750-1185
===============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.SALF.EUROPA; 25 AUG 92 17:57:36 BST
X-Mailer:    ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 25 Aug 1992 17:55:31 BST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@SALFORD.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: IP routing

Carlos Mendes writes....
>
I want PC to connect to Novell Server, via IPX. The problem is that
> IP router only allows IP packets to pass.
> Any public-domain solution to this problem?
Novell have a solution using Lan Workplace for DOS.
, you load the LWP TCP stack on your PC, load IPTUNNEL, and this
tunnels IPX packets through TCP/IP. This gets you to the FIleserver.

Similarly you load IPTUNNEL in the fileserver, and bind a ficticious
Novell network to it.

Richard

--
Richard Letts			My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily
Network Manager                 reflect those of my employer
University of Salford               Email: R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk
United Kingdom			    Phone : +44 61 745 5252
United States of Europe
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: novell@suvm.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"novell@suvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 14:01:00 ADT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         JGARDIN@HUSKY1.STMARYS.CA
Subject: HELP! Weird Netware PROBLEM!!!!!

The users on our network have been experiencing the following problem:

For no reason at all they get bumped off the network with the following error;

> Network error on server ADMIN: Connection no longer valid.
> Abort/Retry?

The error seems to be happening on various machines and just started recently.
In the manual it says that it could be a cabling problem but our cabling guys
checked and repaced all the wiring.

One thing we did notice, We used some software to watch the packets being
transmitted. When a packet is sent from a workstation the "Sniffer" program
will display the appropriate ethernet number for it. When the ADMIN fileserver
sends out a packet it is not identified by it's ethernet address, rather, a 12
digit hex number is displayed. This does not occur if the workstation talks to
another fileserver. (The other fileserver appears with it's correct ethernet
address). The number is nowhere near what it's supposed to be.

Another interesting note:  I brought down the fileserver in question and booted
it up into DOS and loaded some network drivers. I proceeded to log on to
another fileserver. When we monitored the packets from the workstatio (ADMIN
Fileserver) to the other fileserver the correct ethernet number was displayed
by the  "Sniffer" program. So the problem looks like it could be directly
related to the ADMIN Fileserver.


Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.


John

We are running Netware 2.15c with TTS
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: mckimg@alienbaby.ucs.indiana.edu (Geoffrey McKim)
Subject: Re: Print Job Configs
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 20:11:55 GMT

I find that the easiest way to do this is to create the standard  
PRINTCON.DAT file you want to create as SUPERVISOR, copy it into the  
PUBLIC directory (the file should be SYS:MAIL\1\PRINTCON.DAT), and SMODE  
the CAPTURE and NPRINT executables as MODE 5, which means (basically) that  
they search the search drives for files they are looking for (like  
PRINTCON.DAT).   If a user creates their own PRINTCON.DAT, it will  
override the default one in the PUBLIC directory (which is usually a  
desired behavior, I think...).


In article <marc.2.715037521@let.rug.nl>  writes:
> >Does anyone know of a way to allow users to share a standard print job
> >configuration file.  I am creating student accounts in large quantities  
and
> >do not want to have to copy the print job configuration to every single
> >account!!!
> 
> There are several solutions. Some are clumsier than others. What I've  
done
> is this. I have put a number of generally usable PJCs in a public  
directory.
> When a user logs into a file server he copies them to his own mail  
directory.
> That's all.
> 
> N.B. The system login scripts for our file servers contain a line  
assigning
> a user's id to the dos variable ID. This is necessary for the user to be
> able to execute a DOS command like
> 
> 	copy \public\pjc\*.* \mail\%id%
> 
> Marc.
> 
> 
>  
+------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
---+
> | Marc Ch. Dupuis         ###          ###    e-mail:      
marc@let.rug.nl    |
> | Computer Department     #  #        #       p.o. box:   716                 
|
> | Faculty of Arts         ###    #  # # ##    code/town:  9700 AS   
GRONINGEN |
> | Groningen University    # #   #  #  #  #    phone:      (+31) 50 63 59  
57  |
> | The Netherlands         #  # ####    ###    fax:        (+31) 50 63 49  
00  |
>  
+------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
---+

--
Geoffrey McKim
Network Planning & Development Group
Indiana University, Bloomington
mckimg@ucs.indiana.edu
(812) 855-4643
From: tmunro@CCS.CARLETON.CA (Tim Munro)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Re: CD-Rom/Novell/Cisco
Date: 31 Aug 92 14:51:26 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

In bit.listserv.novell you write:

>I have two Meridian Data Systems CD-Roms which reside on two different ethernet
>segments. The problem I have is that the CD-Roms can only be seen by clients
>who reside on the same segment as the particular CD-Rom.  We are running Novell
>3.11 and are routing IPX with a Cisco AGS+ rev. 8.2(7).  The BYUIPX 3.10 and
>Netx 3.26 are being utilized.

        You need Rev 8.3 or better of the Cisco Roms. This is what I
was told by the Cisco people. I was unable to try it since we were
just moving to SCSI Express when this information became available to
me. I have had NO such problem with SCSI Express.

--
Tim Munro

Internet: tmunro@ccs.carleton.ca
Voice:    (613) 788-2600 x3722
Fax:      (613) 788-4448

* Your favourite quip here *
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 26 Aug 1992 12:35:23 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         John Gullo <jag@MED.UNC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Adding Serial Ports to NetWare 2.2 File Server
X-To:         NOVELL@SUVM.SYR.EDU

I am tempted to check with STB and see if thery have different ADF MCA files
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Seebeck Computer Center
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:33:10 CDT
Reply-To:     jford@seebeck.ua.edu
From:         JFORD@SEEBECK.UA.EDU
Subject:      Database Needed

What type of database program are avaible which has the following features:

    1.  NetWare aware
    2.  Windows aware
    3.  Export features (I know, should be standard...)

Please send replies direct and I will post the results to the list.

Thanks in advance.
----------
James Ford - Consultant II, Seebeck Computer Center
             jford@seebeck.ua.edu, jford@risc.ua.edu
             The University of Alabama (in Tuscaloosa, Alabama)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: msjle@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Joi L. Ellis)
Subject: Re: Growing Packet Receive Buffers
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 20:32:04 GMT

Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@SALFORD.AC.UK> writes:

>$DAVEE@SASB.BYU.EDU writes....
>>
>>
>> > I have a Netware 3.11 server with a problem.  When the server is restarted,
>> > the number of packet receive buffers begins growing.  One buffer is added
>> > every thirty seconds until the maximum (currently 200) is reached.  Once
>> > the limit is reached, the server basically stops communicating.  This began
>> > after a second drive was added to the server.  Any ideas?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> This has happened to us on virtually all of our servers.  The only
>> remedy we found was to up the maximum and we haven't had a problem
>> since.
>>
>This happened on one of our sub-networks, and traced it to faulty
>cabling, and to a card which wasn't connected to the network, but
>which had the driver and IPX bound to it.

>Could you have disturbed a LAN cable when you added the disk ?

I had the same problem with an IBM Token Ring 16/4 card.  For various
reasons, I'd had to leave the card disconnected.  In a
Zenith 386, it wasn't a problem at all, the server would boot and hum
happily along on the Pronet side of the lan, ignoring the air-waving TR card.
When that server blew its motherboard, I replaced it with a DTK KEEN
box, which promptly began doing exactly what you're describing.  It'd
sit there and eat packet buffers, and once the last buffer was gone, the
machine would just ignore  everything and twiddle its bits.  

I finally regenned the server again without the TR driver, and it was
happy.

Once we finally got the live link into the building and got the card
attached to something it could talk to, the problem disappeared.  I have
no clue why the original Zenith 386 didn't have a problem but the DTK
did.  I was worried that the TR card wouldn't work at all, but it's
working fine (else you wouldn't be reading this.)


>Richard
>--
>Richard Letts			My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily
>Network Manager                 reflect those of my employer
>University of Salford               Email: R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk
>United Kingdom			    Phone : +44 61 745 5252
>United States of Europe
-- 
Joi Ellis                      msjle@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
Student Residential Programs   Western Illinois University

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU