HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: I've got JUNGLE FEVER...She's got JUNGLE FEVER...
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:51:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: pop-tart.ISBELL.92Apr9145114
	<1992Apr9.043244.27029@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
In-reply-to: michaili@blondie.cs.wisc.edu's message of 9 Apr 92 04:32:44 GMT

michaili@blondie.cs.wisc.edu (Afroditi Michailidi) writes:
|nyberg@ms.uky.edu (Jack Nyberg) writes:
|>as in Spike Lee.  His JUNGLE FEVER was one of the more intelligent
|>offerings this past year.  This comes as no surprise considering that all
|>of his works are excellent (even School Daze which is underrated).
|>
|>   Why are they excellent?  Because they provoke thought and don't conclude
|>with easy answers.  Also Mr. Lee is excellent with the camera and knows his
|>stuff.

|    The problem is, they often don't conclude at all. I'm a fan of Spike Lee's
|ever since I saw _She's gotta have it_. Then follows _School Daze_ nice, a
|change of style but ends ever so suddenly. Then _Do the Right Thing_ which
|has no ending at all. Then _Jungle Fever_ which also ends with no answers. For
|me, it's starting to sound like he doesn't _know_ how to end his films rather
|than that he deliberately avoids ending them.

He does have a problem with that *but* I think _DTRT_ ending in just
the way it should've.  I think Spike's "problem" stems from his two
goals (as if I really know what his goals are):  1) to present a day
or two in the life sort of movie with lots of characters and subplots,
which by their very nature do not always "end" and 2) to ask questions
and present many sides without providing pat answers.

If you buy that, _DTRT_ was clearly his best work in this regard.  And
even if you don't, it was brillant movie.

|    Don't get me wrong, I like his stuff but (to me) it comes off as if he
|doesn't know how to wrap up a story.

But, I suspect that this is a part of it.

|    And to be fair, I found the more conventional ending of _Mo' Better Blues_
|more absurd than normal. Goes to show I don't know what endings should be
|there either.

I wouldn't call it all that conventional.  It was too short and very,
very non-linear those last five minutes.  Gave me a headache.
--
Peace.
     "The US has a vital interest in that area of the country."
                -- Vice President Dan Quayle Referring to Latin America.
                           ------
Don't just adopt opinions |  \/  | I am Charles Isbell, Homeboy from hell,
      develop them.       |  /\  | living axiom and anonymous absolute ruler
                           ------  of the cosmos.
From: mikem@pro-charlotte.cts.com (Mike Miranda)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: \
Date: 10 Apr 92 03:18:44 GMT
Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA

We disagree... I enjoyed "Always" just as much as "Ghost".  Thought it was
a shame the film didn't get more atteintion than it did.  "Ghost" was just
more commercial...
----
ProLine:  mikem@pro-charlotte
Internet: mikem@pro-charlotte.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-charlotte!mikem
ARPA:     crash!pro-charlotte!mikem@nosc.mil
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:13679 rec.arts.tv:9511
From: gberigan@cse.unl.edu (Life...)
Subject: Re: T2 - Why didn't Sarah die???
Organization: Ursa Minor Beta, 402-476-8047 @ 2400
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 02:47:04 GMT

nmehl@rm105serve.sas.upenn.edu (Nathan J. Mehl) writes:

>BTW, Arnold's Terminator clearly identifies himself in the beginning
>of the film as a Cyberdyne Systems Model T-101 - the same as the robot
>in the first film.

Read the book.  There it clearly indentifies him as a T-800.  The full
designation is CSM-101-T-800.  ALSO, on the cover of the first movie
cassette (and likely the movie poster) the characters "T-800" was
displayed over one of the lenses of the Gargoyle shades he wore then!

I'd call that canonical.

>*    -Nathan J. Mehl-     * Destined to be the only queer Guns'n'Roses   *
>* nmehl@pennsas.upenn.edu * fan on the planet. And probably deserves it. *

I'd say Model 101 is the Ah-nold model, with at least two made with that
skin.  The one in the flashback sequence in T1 is a different Model.

--
  ///   ____   \\\       | CAUTION:
  | |/ /    \ \| |       | Avoid eye contact.  In case of contact, flush
   \\_|\____/|_//        | mind for 15 minutes.  See a psychiatrist if
       \_)\\/            | irritation persists.  Not to be taken
gberigan `-' cse.unl.edu | seriously.  Keep out of sight of children.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
Subject: Re: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 18:15:31 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.152001.4184@panix.com> tkelsey@panix.com (Tom Kelsey) writes:
>My feeling is that if he is 'going to the mat' for all this 'artistic'
>integrity he's nuts.  Its a film I feel no one wants to see any way..
>The 'whites' will stay away in DROVES...  
>

I for one am looking forward to it.  Not only because of the subject
matter, but because I'm interested in seeing what Lee is capable of
doing with a large budget.  And trust me, people don't get any
more 'white' than me.




--
McCreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com     Computers are like Old Testament gods;
Me? Speak for Compaq?  Yeah, right.   lots of rules and no mercy.
                                                             Joseph Campbell
From: spencer@stone.Princeton.EDU (S. Spencer Sun)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Theater Owners (was Re: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X")
Date: 15 Apr 92 23:12:10 GMT
Organization: Princeton Univ. Class of '94
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU

In article <OLIVER.92Apr15185624@coate.mit.edu> oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III) writes:
>In article <1992Apr15.160608.23040@nic.umass.edu> a0s5108@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Neal and Mara Priestly) wrote:
>
>[description of what happens to receipts deleted]
>
>Are you a privately-owned theater or part of a chain?  Woudl there be a
>difference in how a contract would work between the two?

I suspect that independants have more autonomy in the matter, although
prices are in large part connected with what the studios / distributors
WANT to be charged for movies... i.e. it's not completely in the hands
of the theater owners.  (I work for Loews... we're mostly East Coast, a
bit into the Midwest, based in Secaucus, NJ... I work in Baltimore when
I'm home)
----------
Spencer Sun - Princeton Univ. Class of '94 - Dept. of Computer Science
Clockwork Orange (Princeton Ultimate) (when I bother to show up for practice)
Playing bridge is like having sex.  You don't need a partner if you
have a good hand.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: msr@kepler.unh.edu (Mathew S Reno)
Subject: Danny Kaye is God (was Re: Best Film Swordfights)
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 00:47:44 GMT

In article <1992Mar31.183131.6877@linus.mitre.org> sdo@hoops.mitre.org (Sean D. O'Neil) writes:
>In article <1992Mar29.195656.29458@cs.yale.edu> loosemore-sandra@CS.YALE.EDU (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>>gl1e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Greg G Levrault) writes:
>>
>>   Anyone who enjoyed the "Princess Bride" scene will love a scene in "The
>>   Court Jester"
>>
>>Well, this film made my "best swordfight" list too.  But the part that
>>had *me* rolling on the floor was the jousting tournament: "The pellet
>>with the poison is in the flagon with the dragon..."
>
>Wasn't it, "The vessel with the pestle has the poison in the pellet,
>the flagon with the dragon has the brew that is true"?
>
>Sean

Well, they broke the flagon with the dragon anyway. :) 
What about the chalice from the palace? (let's see if you remember that one)

---Matt

-- 
********************************************************************************
**Matt Reno            ** Percy-"Ahh, the fashion today is towards the tiny." **
**msr@kepler.unh.edu   ** Edmund-"Then Percy you have the most fashionable    **
**M_RENO@unhh.unh.edu  **         brain in all of England."                   **
********************************************************************************
From: v115p8d6@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Quenby M Chunco)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: A small problem with Silence of the Lambs
Date: 7 Apr 92 01:28:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: acsu.1992Apr7.002806.10733
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr6.234416.20788@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Capt. Frank A. Lauro) writes...
>v115p8d6@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Quenby M Chunco) writes:
> 
>>In article <ddrumm.21rl@amiganet.chi.il.us>, ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us (Daniel Drumm) writes...
>>>Michael Kaufman:
>>> 
> 
>And here, then, is the question that *I've* had since I saw the damned 
>thing, and peers argue both for against it:  did Lecter swallow the
>pen clip, and then wait for it to pass through his digestive system?
>This, I thought, was (1) why he was in the bathroom just prior to its
>appearance, and (2) a pretty damned accurate prediction of one's own
>excretory system. =)

If I remember correctly from the book, he did not swallow the pen piece
but had it concealed in his gum or somewhere in his mouth. I think he
chose the bathroom because it was the most private place in his cell,
he couldn't be watched by the police and so they would not see him take
something from his mouth and hide it.



>--------
>Captain Frank A. Lauro          Commanding Officer       University of Illinois
>fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu       USS ALEXA NCC 1764-D     Urbana-Champaign
>--------
>"What happened to your hair?"
> -- Boothby (Ray Walston) to Picard, TNG: "The First Duty"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dsc@gemini.tmc.edu (Doug S. Caprette Bldg. 28 W191 x3892)
Subject: Eroticism without nudity
Organization: NASA GSFC CDP VLBI
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 14:57:12 GMT

In article <702653666@macbeth.cs.duke.edu> kirk@cs.duke.edu (Scooter Corleone) writes:
>In article <4755@umriscc.isc.umr.edu> wdechent@usenet.umr.edu (William L.
>Dechen
>t) writes:
>>
>>       I'd like to see some discussion of how this issue reflects on
>>our culture.  ...
>
>
>see her completely naked and panting, and I think movies that allude to sex
>are much more exciting than today's more explicit and clinical displays.
>
Indeed, the most erotic scene I can recall from any film is the racetrack
discussion between Bogart and Bacall in "The Big Sleep".
From: hist1261@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Vietnam War Films
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:48:06 +1200
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

Greetings from the antipodes.  I'm working on a doctoral
dissertation on Vietnam War films, specifically American combat movies.  I would
appreciate ANY information, or references with regard such films, particularly
"Platoon" and the on-going works of Oliver Stone.

E-mail to the above address.

Thanks in advance,
 Richard Swainson.
From: eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng)
Subject: Re: Info on Michael Biehn?????
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 10 Apr 92 01:51:24 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.182913.17026@news.Hawaii.Edu> dicksion@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Matthew W. Dicksion) writes:
>Mr. Biehn was also the lieutenant in _Navy Seals_, so that makes two
>movies in which he was a SEAL, and three in which he was military...
>I also remember him in a movie I saw on TV, the title of which I didn't
>see but which had him playing an asshole doctor who was Real Nice before
>he married his wife...but then his wife discovers his true nature when he
>starts to do things like scare her with giant spiders and take pictures
>of her reaction, or attempt to kill the cat when it scratches him.  His line
>after he threw the cat was something like, "Do you know why I got so angry?
>Because it ran away.  I hate it when things run away from me.  Don't you
>ever run away from me, dear..."  Then I changed the station.

Earlier there were lots of posts about Michael Biehn... This was the ABC
movie-of-the-week called "Deadly Intentions" with Cloris Leachman as the 
slightly crazy or just plain weird mother and Madolyn Smith(-Osborne) as the
wife. 

Also might wanna check for Michael in "The Fan" with Lauren Bacall, and a
TV movie called "The Coach."  Cathy Lee Crosby plays an Olympic star who
gets hired to coach a boys basketball team.  I think Michael's got blond
hair in this one.  (He plays one of the basketball players.)

eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu

"It's great to be young and insane."

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mushens@fraser.sfu.ca (David Russell Mushens)
Subject: Re: Jo Anne Worley
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 03:21:47 GMT

eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng) writes:

>During Beauty and the Beast, I found that the voice of the Wardrobe sounded
>familiar and the credits listed the voice as belonging to Jo Anne Worley (sp?)

>Can anybody tell me what else she might have been in?  Her name sounds familiar
>too but I can't seem to place the face...

>Thanx...

Actually, I think that her career centred around her appearances on
Match Game.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: Jo Anne Worley
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 16:31:31 GMT

In article <mushens.702789707@sfu.ca>, mushens@fraser.sfu.ca (David Russell Mushens) writes:
> eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng) writes:
> 
> >During Beauty and the Beast, I found that the voice of the Wardrobe sounded
> >familiar and the credits listed the voice as belonging to Jo Anne Worley (sp?)
> 
> >Can anybody tell me what else she might have been in?  Her name sounds familiar
> >too but I can't seem to place the face...
> 
> >Thanx...
> 
> Actually, I think that her career centred around her appearances on
> Match Game.


Was she one of the title characters on "The Mothers-In-Law"?

GMS
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: u906789@bruny.cc.utas.edu.au (Mark Julian Turner)
Subject: Re: T2 is crap!
Organization: University of Tasmania, Australia.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 08:06:44 GMT

madkiwi@camelot.bradley.edu (Michael Eade) writes:


>T-1000, once he has touched a person, can simulate that person and their voice.  Once he touched Sarah, he would've offed her.  

It can only simulate a voice after hearing it. Hence the "Call John..." scene.

>Much too civilized for a machine that hates humans, don't you think?
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:13078 rec.music.misc:13558 rec.games.trivia:1750
From: bixenman@ccop1.ocpt.ccur.com (michael bixenman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.music.misc,rec.games.trivia
Subject: Re: Secret Samples (Shriekback & Pop Will Eat Itself)
Date: 6 Apr 92 11:56:39 GMT
Reply-To: bixenman@ccop1.UUCP (michael bixenman)
Organization: CONCURRENT COMPUTER,OCEANPORT NJ

ford@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Carolyn Ford) writes:
>cybe@leland.Stanford.EDU (Rajesh Krishnan) writes:
>>The song Nemesis, by Shriekback, has a sampled quote that sounds like it
>>is from a movie:
>I'm not sure about Nemesis, but a lot of Shriekback music was used in the
>movie _Manhunter_ (the movie based on the book which was the prequel to
>"The Silence of the Lambs").  The music is used IMHO very well, and adds
>to the darkness and eeriness of the film.  Good flick.
MANHUNTER is based on the book THE RED DRAGON, in case you want to read it!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mike Bixenman       bixenman@ccop1.ocpt.ccur.com       CIS=73220,3644
 Concurrent Computer Corp.            My disclaimer - "NOT THE SPOKESMAN, 
 Oceanport, NJ   U.S.A.             NOT THE SPOKESMAN, NOT THE SPOKESMAN."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: erk@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (eric.r.kierstead)
Subject: Re: THE GOOD GUY GETS IT
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 12:58:41 GMT
Summary: "To Live and Die in L.A.". William Pederson is the Hero, and
	 he gets iced at the end of the movie.

In article <1992Apr14.082357.6752@maths.tcd.ie>, djohn@maths.tcd.ie (Derek John) writes:
> 
>    Having stayed up until the early hours last friday 
> to watch THE WICKER MAN on the telly,I was a bit cheesed
> off when after spending an hour and a half building to 
> the climax the main hero (Edward Woodward) is killed off
> and the bad guys win hands down.I felt quite bad about it

    *************Bunch of stuff deleted *************

> feeling very cold.Has anyone else got any good examples of a film
> that starts off in the usual way but the good guy gets it?

    "To Live and Die in L.A." --  William Pederson is the Good Guy,
    and he gets iced at the end of the movie.  It was a surprise
    when it happened, but it fit pretty well with the flavor of
    the movie.
From: gunthar@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: T-3 plot possibility
Date: 15 Apr 92 16:02:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: vax1.1992Apr15.100250.1724
Organization: Mankato State University

The only dangling plot thread that I think really needs tying up is: 

Who invented time travel?

Ten to one says that if we'd ever gotton a good look at the room in which the
time travel equipment was installed, there'd be a door leading to an imaging 
chamber in the back wall. :)

G.
-----------
The movie "Bethoven" just goes to show how many years you have to wait to make
a comedy about a St. Bernard -- after Cujo came out.
From: jpb@calmasd.Prime.COM (Jan Bielawski)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Movie bloopers (things they should have spotted)
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:12:25 GMT
Organization: Computervision, San Diego, CA

In article <H23miB4w164w@gorilla.nbn.com> deej@gorilla.nbn.com (Donna Corner Holmes) writes:
<andyi@world.std.com (Andy G Ihnatko) writes:
<
<> So if a boom mike or something is in the top or bottom half of the frame, the
<> theater audience will never see it.  When they put it on home video, though,
<> sometimes they'll save money and instead of panning and scanning the movie
<> screen image, they'll just slap the original frames in as-is.
<
<It wasn't just on the video. I recall that my husband and I noticed it
<and we saw the movie in the theatres several months ago.

	Movies filmed with a "soft matte" can be shown incorrectly even in
theaters.  I saw Sidney Lumet's "Network" projected full-frame once: the
boom was visible throughout, in each and every scene.

	Jan Bielawski
	Computervision R&D, San Diego
	jpb@calmasd.prime.com
From: smith@ctron.com (Larry Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Soylent green (was: ROLLERBALL QUESTIONS ???)
Date: 14 Apr 92 17:00:41 GMT
Reply-To: smith@ctron.com
Organization: Cabletron Systems, Inc.

In article <Qdu_bDm00VpEMBwkhA@andrew.cmu.edu>, lb2e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Louis Blair) writes:

>>WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE MOVIE-- SOYLENT GREEN????

>I think the ending leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

Especially if you just had some |-P

Larry Smith (smith@ctron.com) No, I don't speak for Cabletron.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a "disgrace",
that two are called a "law firm", and that three or more become a "Congress".
From: loftis@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Kirk Loftis)
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1992 17:20:05 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: What's the big deal?/Homosexual roles in the movies
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

	One thing that has occurred to me, the news/press has probably done
more damage to gays and lesbians than Hollywood would ever be able to.  I
agree that Hollywood protraying lesbians/gays as psycho killers is 
re-enforcing this image, but the press loves to dwell on these issues.
Anything that is hot to make a quick buck for sensationalism and the press
will be there shining those hot-lights to get a picture.

	Just a thought.....Kirk
Organisation: European Space Operation Centre (E.S.O.C)
Date: Friday, 10 Apr 1992 00:25:38 CET
From: <KSNIDVON@ESOC.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Eroticism without nudity
 <32372@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <1992Apr8.113305.54297@cc.usu.edu>
 <1992Apr9.034858.22093@amhux2.amherst.edu>

re: the nude scene with ellen barkin & al pacino in the "sea of love".

i'm sure she has a body double in this scene. watch it again - you never
actually see her face in the full length nude shot.

does anyone know for certain?

mind you, it was definitely all her in "siesta" (or fiesta?).


k.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: birch@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Steve Birch CSD)
Subject: Re: Predator II Question- Clarification!!
Organization: University of New Brunswick
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:43:08 GMT

In article <cam.703311038@hawk> cam@hawk.adied.oz.au (Cameron Newham) writes:
>birch@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Steve Birch CSD) writes:
>
>
>> Forgive me if this question has been asked before but....
>
>> At the end of Predator II, the alien leader tosses a gun to our hero then
>> says something to him.
>> 
>> Question: there was an inscription on the gun..what did it say??
>> Question: what did the evil dude say??
>
>As far as I understood it, the gun had an inscription on it from the 18th
>century.  The scene was meant to imply that the aliens had been to earth
>before and "hunted" the natives.  Presumably their previous opponents had
>been people in the 18th century.
>The inscription itself was just a name and a date.
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There was an inscription on the gun..I saw that as well. I also got the
idea that it was an old gun, therefore the predators had been visiting earth
for a long time. Whats been driving us crazy is WHAT NAME WAS ON THE GUN!!
Somebody mentioned that they thought it was a pirate. My feeling is that
the predators killed someone famous..whose death to this day is unexplained.

Any ideas.
Thanks


-- 
Steven Birch
University of New Brunswick
Fredericton N.B. Canada
Internet: BIRCH@UNB.CA
From: melindac@thedarktower.Corp.Sun.COM (I Shop therefore I AM!!)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: re BASIC INSTINCT: I hated it (spoilers)
Date: 8 Apr 92 23:26:51 GMT
Reply-To: melindac@thedarktower.Corp.Sun.COM (I Shop therefore I AM!!)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.  Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: thedarktower.corp.sun.com


	v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michelle L. Zafron) :
	> The film has also given homophobic movements an incredible 
	> boost by portraying homosexuality as aberrant and dangerous, 
	> but I'm not going to get into this now.

Personally, I liked the fact that her character was bi. It's refreshing
to see a character who doesn't apologize for her sexual orientation and
doesn't end up being "saved" from it at the end of the movie.

I thought the movie was decent entertainment. I also admire Sharon
Stone for accepting such a controversial role. Here's one actress
who isn't squeamish about doing nude scenes, or explicit love scenes,
or even kissing, hugging, and fondling another woman. Most actresses
these days would cop out of nude scenes by using body doubles - no guts.

	Melinda
From: sullivana@gtephx.UUCP (Anne Sullivan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jo Anne Worley
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:40:54 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AG Communication Systems, Phoenix, Arizona

In article <1992Apr9.163131.15868@cbnewse.cb.att.com>, gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:
> > eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng) writes:
> > 
> > >During Beauty and the Beast, I found that the voice of the Wardrobe sounded
> > >familiar and the credits listed the voice as belonging to Jo Anne Worley (sp?)
> > 
> > >Can anybody tell me what else she might have been in?  Her name sounds familiar
> > >too but I can't seem to place the face...
> > 
> 
> Was she one of the title characters on "The Mothers-In-Law"?
> 
For some odd reason, my brain remembers Eve Arden and Kaye Ballard
as the title characters in that TV show.  (If there was a movie I 
haven't seen it.)   My memory of JoAnn Worley is in Laugh-In.

Anne Sullivan