HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: chyang@metonymy.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang)
Subject: Re: Pac Ten Preview (10-17-92)
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 17:25:21 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: chyang@metonymy.engin.umich.edu


In article <1992Oct16.182600.12094@u.washington.edu>, crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:
> Finally, we get a full slate of conference action this week, with no byes
> or out of conference games.  In addition, there seem to be two particularly
> difficult games for our pundits to pick:
> 
> Washington @ Oregon
> 
> Sean Burwell  must be able to run the ball in order to keep the Husky defense
> from overwhelming QB Danny O'Neil.  The Ducks gave up 13 sacks last week
> to the Trojans, and you have got to know that the Huskies are drooling in
> anticipation of getting to the QB.  On the Husky side of the ball, this
> week marks the return of Mark Brunell to the starting lineup in place of
		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^	  	
> Billy Joe Hobert.  Neither QB was particularly effective throwing the ball
> last week, but Brunell did run well when he was called upon to do so by
> head coach Don James.  Hobert will come in during the second quarter as
> Brunell has done for the first part of the season.

	Very good!  Very good!   I think Brunell can really bring the
Huskies' offense back.  And I think that he will be ready to take back 
the what was taken away from him.  He adds more speed to the Husky 
offense and his passing game is, I think, much more reliable than Hoberts, 
though not as explosive.  The running will certainly be improved, now the
Huskies will have a quarterback with break away speed.  We`ll see how he
does against Oregon.  

	As for Hobert, the kid is struggling this year.  But he is only a
junior, he will be back.  

	But I am really excited for the Huskies now.  I think the offense
should really take off starting this week. (Fingers Crossed).

	Look for Napolean Kaufman to have another career day.

- Hope your favorite team wins this weekend.

- Chung Yang
 

> 
> ****************************************************************************
> Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
> Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
> University of Washington      *   water again!
> Seattle, WA 98195             *
> ****************************************************************************
From: poore@ds13.scri.fsu.edu (David Poore)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: PENN STATE BEATS MIAMI!!!!!
Date: 13 Oct 92 14:28:37 GMT
Reply-To: poore@ds13.scri.fsu.edu (David Poore)
Organization: Florida State University

In article <92286.205305RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu> RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>in every statistical category except for return yards, and the most important
>one, interceptions.  Given the facts that Miami was dominated by Penn State

Ummm, I think you're omitting one stat that is slightly more important
than either of these.

Anyway, welcome to the club. Miami's been doing it to FSU this way for
some years now. Like it er not, they're winners.

David Poore
poore@ds13.scri.fsu.edu
From: crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Sagarin's Conference Rankings
Date: 14 Oct 92 22:29:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct14.222923.20668
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

I just thought I would add a little fuel to the fire.  The following stats
are derived from Sagarin's computer ranking scheme published weekly (on
Tuesdays) in the USAT.  The difference in scores indicates what a team
should be favored over another team on a neutral field.  Add three points
to the home team if the game is not being played on a neutral field.

Pac 10: 1-UW,8-USC,11-Stan,19-Cal,21-Ariz,24-WSU,27-UCLA,32-ASU,33-Ore
        104-OSU					Avg:  83.56
ACC:	4-FSU,7-Vir,15-Clem,20-NCSt,35-GT,49-UNC,56-UM,58-Dk,67-WF
						Avg:  80.92
Big 8:	3-NU,14-KU,16-CU,18-OU,68-KSt,72-ISt,75-CSt,87-OSt
						Avg:  78.02
SEC:	10-UT,12-UG,13-Ala,22-MSU,26-Aub,29-UF,42-LSU,50-Miss,52-Ark,
	64-UK,85-Vandy,99-USC			Avg:  76.96
Bg Est:	6-Mi,23-BC,28-Syr,30-WV,53-VT,60-RU,77-Pitt,125-Temple
						Avg:  75.19
Big 10:	1-Mich,31-OSU,38-Ill,40-Iw,43-Ind,48-UW,54-MSU,71-Mn,81-Pd,97-NW
						Avg:  75.07
SWC:	17-TAMU,25-UH,37-By,41-UT,46-TT,63-Rc,110-TCU,116-SMU
						Avg:  72.68

You can argue with Sagarin's system if you like, but it certainly indicates
that the Pac Ten is no picnic (excepting OSU).  Sagarin rates all division
I-A and I-AA teams together.  For the curious, the highest I-AA team is 
Northern Iowa at #45.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rbutera@owlnet.rice.edu (Robert John Butera)
Subject: Re: tu/uo
Organization: Rice University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 19:17:33 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.160551.2181@ods.com> scott@ods.com (Scott Harper) writes:

>Oh yeah, you okies better watch out... those ole tsips have
>THE BIGGEST TEXAS FLAG IN THE WORLD, AND THEY'RE GONNA RUN IT
>AROUND ON THE FIELD BEFORE THE GAME!!!!!  They also have a cow,

NO! Not that!  Not the FLAG!  Not the Lone Star Flag!

(these crazy Texas display that flag more than all the rednecks
 in the south combined display their stars and bars ...)

 ... and since when was the Texas flag the property of UT?  Doesn't
     this offend the A&Mers?  Is UT too cheap to come up with a 
     school flag?

>-- 
>Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
>scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
>(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081


-- 
Rob Butera - ECE grad student   Rice University, Houston, TX   rbutera@rice.edu

"Boredom is a vital problem for the moralist, since at least half the sins of
 mankind are caused by the fear of it."  - Bertrand Russell (1930)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Subject: Re: Colorado pounds Mizzou 6-0
Reply-To: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. (VMS Software Support - Colorado)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:54:13 GMT

--
>What I didn't get from this game is whether CU isn't that good or
>if Mizzou has improved.

Mizzou is not improved THAT much. CU has begun to show a trend the last few
years of playing to it's opponents level. I don't know why they have been doing
this BUT a W is a W.

Don't worry. Come Halloween they WILL be up for it.

Husker Henderson

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 M_Henderson               | "Could you please continue the petty bickering?
 Marty Henderson           |  I find it most intriguing."   ---    Data, 
 Woodland Park, Colorado   |  Star Trek, The Next Generation, "Haven"
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: Biggest Rivalry in the Country?
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 13:14:50 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.174714.4108@b11.b11.ingr.com>, mcconnel@b11.b11.ingr.com (Guy McConnell) writes:
> In article <1992Oct10.051620.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> fvest@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>>
>> (... Bo over the top...)
>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     For what it is worth, Bo dropped by my parents' house shortly after 
> this game and I asked him if he made it over the line.  He smiled and said
> "Nope, but the official thought I did and that's all that matters".  
> Watching the replay over and over, I never thought he had made it.  But, 
> it counts and auburn won.

Ahh Guy, Bo was probably just trying to rag you and rub salt in the wound! 
To tell you the truth, I always thought he scored.  I guess I need to find
someone's video of the game.

Some old time Auburn fans swear that Kenny Stabler scored a td against AU
that should have been called back for a holding penalty in a late 60's 7-3 
bama win.  Kenny kind of laughs it off in his autobiography, but he doesn't
ever come out and say if its true or not.  So maybe if Bo didn't score, it
makes up for the Stabler TD!  (I've been hearing about this TD for years and
I had a chance to see a replay of it on TV last year.  Unfortunately, the
camera wasn't on the linemen when Kenny took off!  Oh well.)

-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@accs.duc.auburn.edu 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mp@sparcler.cc.ncsu.edu (Manoj Kumar Patel)
Subject: Re: Best marching band
Organization: North Carolina State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 00:38:38 GMT

pkester@hooville.mitre.org (Peter Kester) writes:

>>Charlie Cockrell writes:
...
>>>topic they can think of. The Pep Band used to be a lot funnier - they've
>>>instituted a review board which screens all of the jokes now. 
...
>There's definitely a correlation.  The better the team does, the more the
>review board waters down the jokes.

Makes sense. People are looking for reasons to hate the good teams, have
to be careful with ALL aspects of the team.

Also, the better the team, the more publicity the other aspects of the
game get, so the higher the probability that overly sensetive (but
powerful) souls will hear about the Band's antics.

>Looking forward to seeing the Pep Band and signing the Good Old Song many
                                            ^^^^^^^
>times (hopefully) this weekend.

That's what I call a serious review board. 

        Manoj
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Dave's Trip To Florida/Injury Report
Date: 16 Oct 92 02:41:37 GMT
Organization: Auburn University, AL

Auburn at Florida.  This Saturday in Gainesville Fla.  And I'll be there.

Now for the bad news.  Auburn tight end Fred Baxter has a stress fracture in
his leg and will miss several weeks.  Fullback Reid McMilion has reinjured a
knee and is doubtful for the Florida game.

Oh well, I attended a Florida graduation once and it seemed that there were
very few parking spaces near the stadium.  I guess I'd better pack the
walking shoes!!

-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@accs.duc.auburn.edu
From: kmartin@dogwood.cray.com (Kenneth B. Martin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: News on MSU/AU Game!!
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:34:10 GMT
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.


What is the latest news, if any, on the Auburn/Mississippi State game?
I live in Atlanta, and don't get information on AU games generally.
If you know of anything of interest, please post!!

Regards,

An information-hungry AU fan,

Ken

--
===========================================================================
Ken Martin, Sales Analyst                   Phone:  (404) 631-2244
Cray Research South Government District     EMAIL:  kmartin@sedist.cray.com
===========================================================================
From: jm21@prism.gatech.EDU (Jim Marks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Worst Rule in College Football
Date: 13 Oct 92 13:25:08 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <92286.160730MBAJSA@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com> MBAJSA@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com (jeff appleman) writes:
>In article <cls4.718915547@Isis.MsState.Edu>, cls4@ra.msstate.edu (Charles L.
>Spirrison) says:
>>
>>The worst rule in college football?
>>No doubt in my mind --> the defensive pass-interference rule!
>>
>>Opinions or other nominations?
>
> And how many times have you seen a Hail Mary perfectly defended or close and
>the zebras decide there was interference. It works both ways - the announcers
>even get this right - "it's time to put it up and hope for a miracle or get the
>interference call". Talk about a game decided by the officiating!!
> Obviously, my vote is to leave it the way it is.
>
> - Jeff  GO LIONS!

Actually, the rule used to be that the offense got the ball at the point of
the foul (or the 1-yd line if in the end zone).  The problems that Jeff
mentions were, I believe, the primary reason for changing the rule.  


I don't remember what year it was changed, but it hasn't been that long ago.  
There had been a number of crucial plays where there were questions about the
interference calls.  This way it was felt the officials decisions might not
be quite so pivotal.  


Of course, there could be the problem the original poster brings out, 
although I haven't seen such a thing happen (at least so that it was 
obvious).







-- 
************************************************************************
*Jim Marks		 	    |  Georgia Tech Research Institute *
*jim.marks@gtri.gatech.edu	    |  Concepts Analysis Laboratory    *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: I-AA Attendence (Re: was UNI vs. Iowa in '94?
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 1992 08:52:03 CST
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <1992Oct8.215722.20932@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, pdunn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick L Dunn) writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.145511.7418@iscsvax.uni.edu> bohy6489@iscsvax.uni.edu >writes:
>>The Dome seats 16,000 for football, and around 22,500 for basketball (but they
>>only do that when Iowa or ISU comes to town - it is usually around 10,000 for
>>basketball).  It is rarely if ever full, at least that was the case when I was
>>in undergrad.  I think most people still go to see the marching band (IMHO
>>better than ISU's, or at least it used to be).  It's a great place if you like
>>domes and artificial turf.
>
>Just a thought--
>
>I-AA stadium size and more importantly attendence is crucial when the playoffs 
>come aouond.  The highest ranked team in a tournament pair will not necessarily
>get a home-field advantage.  Athletic directors at the two schools submit bids 
>for the game based upon predicted attendence.  If a team draws well, then the
>athletic director can submit a higher bid.
>
>One exception to this is the number one team in the final poll, which seems to
>get all its games at home regardless.  (UNI fans, take note).
>
>So you see, even I-AA football is tainted by money lust.
>
Well, The UNI-Dome was oversold by 2,000 for the last game(according
to my relatives in CF).  So look for tickets to be tougher to get
(which is nice to see).  [for Jim Bohy: The Hill has been called
a riot place the last two weeks, but from what I heard it was just
a bunch of people blocking the streets after the game.]
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
From: mbs@zycor.lgc.com (Matt Shostak)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Lies, D**n Lies, etc (Re: PSU is Overrated!)
Date: 14 Oct 92 21:01:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: lgc.1992Oct14.210112.5872
Distribution: usa
Organization: Landmark/Zycor   Austin, Texas

In article <1992Oct14.202548.20205@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <1992Oct13.233007.12652@ultra.com> rajiv@ultra.com (Rajiv Dhingra) writes:
>>When Penn State won the MNC in '82 it played and beat Nebraska. 
>With two questionable calls in the game winning drive, including a trap
>on the game winning TD. 
>
>>BTW, that year the Penn State schedule included 7 bowl teams 
>Should be 8, include Maryland with Boomer. Wasn't Notre Dame a bowl team 
>too?

Absolutely not. This was Faust's second year.  As net fans should know,
wins against Faust-coached Irish squads do not count. :)

>-- 
>                                          Edward Lor
>                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com


-- 
Matthew B. Shostak              Landmark/Zycor
mbs@zycor.lgc.com               (512) 282-6699
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric West)
Subject: Re: Big Ten Review (10-10-92)
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.college
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 04:01:04 GMT

Mark Atchison writes:
>Randy Peppler writes:
>>Illinois (3-2) 18, OHIO STATE (3-2) 16
>>	                        .....And, it was Homecoming in Columbus.
>				     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Nope.  Next week versus Northwestern.  We're last, but we ain't stupid. :)
>
>GO BUCKS!!!

Don't forget, Northwestern is 1-0 this year while playing at other schools'
Homecomings... :)

ecw
fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
GO CATS!!
From: scott@fraud.Berkeley.EDU (Scott Silvey)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: California - Washington game
Date: 8 Oct 92 10:24:58
Organization: UC Berkeley Experimental Computing Facility (XCF)
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: xcf-gw.berkeley.edu


Interesting trivia on the upcomming #1 vs #24 game ...

Since Arizona State stole our head coach, we decided to go snag someone
else's coach to replace him this year...  Cal's coach Gilbertson was 
Washington's offensive coordinator last season.

Washington's offensive and defensive schemes are sort of a mini-California
configuration so the two teams apparently look very similar game-wise.  ;^) 

To prepare the Cal players for hostile territory where 72000+ screaming weenie
dawgs are expected to show up, Gilbertson has been having the Cal band play the
Washington fight song at practice all week.

Go Bears!

Washington too ... hope you guys do really well for the rest of the season
after this week.

Scott
From: aakhos@cajun
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: WEEKLY S.E.C. RANKINGS
Date: 13 Oct 92 15:29:57 GMT
Distribution: na
Nntp-Posting-User: aakhos

In article <1992Oct12.013359.26735@cybernet.cse.fau.edu>, azzarito@cse.fau.edu (Doug Azzarito) writes:
> 
>     S.E.C. Eastern Division Standings
> 
>              S.E.C.  TOTAL
> TEAM         W L T   W L T  Last Week's Results          Next opponent
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tennessee    3 1 0   5 1 0  LOST v. Arkansas, 25-24      v. Alabama, 10/17
> Georgia      3 1 0   5 1 0  WON v. GeorgiaSo, 34-7       v. Vanderbilt, 10/17
> Florida      2 2 0   2 2 0  Won v. LSU, 28-21            v. Auburn, 10/17
> Vanderbilt   1 2 0   2 3 0  LOST v. WakeForest, 40-6     at Gerogia, 10/17
> Kentucky     1 2 0   3 2 0  --IDLE--                     at LSU, 10/17
> S. Carolina  0 4 0   0 5 0  --IDLE--                     v. Miss St., 10/17
> 
>     S.E.C. Western Division Standings
> 
>              S.E.C.  TOTAL
> TEAM         W L T   W L T  Last Week's Results          Next opponent
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Alabama      3 0 0   6 0 0  WON at Tulane, 37-0          at Tenn, 10/17
> Miss. State  2 1 0   4 1 0  WON v. Auburn, 14-7          at S.Carolina,10/17
> Auburn       2 2 0   4 2 0  LOST at Miss St., 14-7       at Florida, 10/17
> Mississippi  2 2 0   3 2 0  --IDLE--                     at Arkansas, 10/17
> Arkansas     2 2 0   2 4 0  WON at Tenn, 25-24           v. Mississippi,10/17
> LSU          1 3 0   1 5 0  LOST at Florida, 28-21       v. Kentucky, 10/17





Looks like SEC teams are going to beat eachother and none will be in contention
for National Championship.  'Bama is the last hope but I'm very
sure that they will lose a game before Jan 1.  They still have to
play Tenn, MSU and Auburn.

But nobody can deny that SEC is the toughest conference from top to bottom.


Ajay
From: ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Bama vs Tenn TV
Date: 15 Oct 92 19:20:24 GMT
	<1992Oct13.181823.26357@b11.b11.ingr.com> <a=1z7r-@rpi.edu>
Organization: American Math. Society

In article <a=1z7r-@rpi.edu> kollur@jec310.its.rpi.edu (Ramana Kolluri) writes:

   >I am really pissed off that Bama/Tenn is not a national telecast. Maybe it
   >has something to do with Tenn losing last week and with my luck I am sure
   >the local ABC station will have Michigan/Indiana or some pointless
   >Pac-10 game. 

Well I'm a true-blue Michigan fan and even I'd rather see the
Bama/Tenn game than Michigan/Indiana.  The only thing interesting
about Michigan games is how many points will they win by.
Nevertheless, GO BLUE!  BEAT DA HOOSIERS!  Oh, and go Tennessee! Beat
the Tide!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Gupta Power Ratings 10/5/92
Organization: University of Michigan
	<1992Oct6.211108.1202@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
	<1992Oct6.224137.15975@colorado.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 13:55:36 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.224137.15975@colorado.edu> manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu) writes:

   In article <1992Oct6.211108.1202@zip.eecs.umich.edu> rjones@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Randolph M. Jones) writes:
   >
   >I think the idea is that (at least according to these polls) Stanford was a
   >better team than Texas A&M even THEN.  After all, it was a very close game,
   >and football isn't an exact science.

   Are you nuts? The winner is ALWAYS the better team, no matter what!!!

   Njan

Do you put teeth under your pillows too?

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: AP Top 25 (Was Re: Miami Can Not Be Denied!!!)
Date: 15 Oct 92 13:29:28 GMT
	<1992Oct12.185037.18585@u.washington.edu>
	<dkm2.718918218@Isis.MsState.Edu>
	<1992Oct12.213246.28592@u.washington.edu>
	<dkm2.718951522@Isis.MsState.Edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: American Math. Society


In article <dkm2.718951522@Isis.MsState.Edu> dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:

  >Actually, I just want all of this Miami - Washington woofing to stop.  Until
  >the two teams play, it will continue.  Even if one team gets beat, they
  >will say the other still can not beat them.  Oh well.....

But they won't say as much.  Nothing stops woofing like a good loss.
Witness the lack of woofing by TOSU and Tennessee fans lately...

Here's to Miami and Washington, ahead of Michigan in the polls, but
behind Michigan in talent.  
Go Blue!
From: costley@solo.eng.hou.compaq.com (Brett Costley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: PSU is Overrated!!!!!!
Date: 16 Oct 92 21:22:58 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.

In article <Bw87w3.3nv@rice.edu> rbutera@owlnet.rice.edu (Robert John Butera) writes:

stuff deleted

>MNC by AP FINAL POLL (after bowl games)
>
>1980  Georgia   (beat #7 Notre Dame 17-10 in the Sugar Bowl)
>1981  Clemson   (beat #4 Nebraska 22-15 in the Orange Bowl)
>1982  Penn State (beat previosuly undefeated Georgia 27-23 in Orange
>Bowl)
								^^^^^
							should be Sugar
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: sujan@stein.u.washington.edu (Sujan Punyamurthula)
Subject: Re: The Bowl Coalition fails yet again
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 23:38:54 GMT

How about this scenario

Alabama loses to Tennesse
Miami loses to Syracuse( They have good field goal kickers!)
Washington beats Michigan in Rose Bowl

then I wonder who will be the National Champ?????
:)

sj
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Worst Rule in College Football
From: <JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 09:53:38 EDT
Organization: Penn State University

The pass interference rule played a LARGE role in last year's
Miami-FSU game.  Miami was called for pass interference inside their
own ten yard line, but because of the rule, FSU only got 15 yards
instead of 30-something yards.  Quite possibly cost FSU the game.

But then, you could also say that FSU lost because the goal posts
were moved in.

Or that there was a sudden gravity surge as the ball went up . . .

Erickson made a pact with Satan . . .


Jim Thomas
"He who scores the most, wins."