HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa


In article <9210131450.AA26217@relay1.UU.NET> M.E.Fletcher@gdr.bath.ac.uk writes:
>I am totally stunned by the extreme misinterpretations of the
>song Wow that I have seen recently! Here is my alternative interpretation.
>
>Matt
>
>Theatre actors wear heavy make-up known as greasepaint. After the show it
>is removed by rubbing it off with vaseline. Hence "he's too busy hitting
>the  vaseline" means he is too busy back in the dressing room cleaning up
>to receive any applause/accolades etc. No dressing room with a star
>and make-up girls for him. There is no implied reference to homosexuality.
>
	What about the BBC banning or re-editing the video because she
pats her bum when saying that line.  She also does this on the "Live at
Hammersmith Odeon" concert video-tape.  I took this as a sort of
confirmation of my theory (which I think I originally read here on
gaffa).  The make-up removal interpretation was what I originally
thought the line to mean, since I used to be in drama group.

>glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gordon Locke) [that's me!] writes:
>>	Yes, I understand the song to be referring to homosexuals, but
>>in a positive way.  Don't forget, the actor's "Vaseline-hitting" is why
>>"he'll never make the Sweeney (movie theatre?) / Or be that movie queen".  
>>I've always taken this to refer to discrimination in the acting business.
>>The song also sez: "We'd give you a part, my love, / But you'd have to
>>play the fool."  My guess is that this is the sort of implied
>>condescending attitude such an actor would get a lot of. 
>
>Once again, it's losers/failing to make it etc. not about homosexuality.
>The Sweeney was a very successful British TV cop show around the time
>the song was round. The song is about the miserable existence failed
>actors/actresses have, not realising their ambitions. They're never the
>stars, only the bit parts. The fool is a common Shakespearean role.
>
	Yeah, that interpretation _was_ a bit of a reach on my part!

	- Gord, a.k.a. glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:01:53 EDT
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:01:13 -0400
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gordon Locke)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: This Woman's Work
Message-ID: <1992Oct7.213532.29918@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa


	At first I wasn't going to shell out the _major_ loons (that's
Canadian dollars for youse foreigners =^]) for the TWW box set, but when
the local record store marked down their only remaining LP version to
the point that they were making $2 on it, I made the plunge.  I was only
ever planning to get the vinyl version, anyway, but it seemed they
couldn't get rid of that one, while they sold 2 or 3 CD versions.
	I then thought I'd justify this excessive expenditure by selling
my existing records.  Though the large sized picture book, original
cover TKI and new songs I'd never heard before (B-sides) already
cushioned the blow somewhat.  But again I changed my mind -- I want to
be able to _play_ my records, don't I? =^]
	BTW, the box set was a UK import that the manager of a nearby
Sam the Record Man (a _HUGE!!_ Kate fan) had ordered in.  It was not
released domestically here as far as I know.  (This guy -- Wayne I think
his nam was -- had tons of Kate posters, rare albums, picture discs,
etc. plastered on the walls of a little back room in the Store.  I would
visit the place just to hang around near the back and cop an occasional
glimpse into this wonrdrous visual collage of Kate stuff!)
Unfortunately, he since left the store to manage one somewhere else --
New Brunswick, I think.  So now some lucky N.B. Kate fans get to see
this collection of Katenalia, gleaned from years in the biz, presumably.
>sigh!<
	- Gord, Self-Proclaimed Supreme Kate Fan of Newfoundland!!
	- glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca
	(Although a couple of my friends would dispute this claim!)l
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 15 Oct 1992 05:15:02 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 05:11:37 -0400
From: 72210.2035@CompuServe.COM (Mike Weaver)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Just a Note
Message-ID: <921014215050_72210.2035_CHF55-3@CompuServe.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

Andrew Simchik-this is Angel again, reading some more of your messages-you
are very interesting! I will read more later.
 


x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:44:03 EDT
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:39:59 -0400
From: MIHARKI@INDSVAX1.INDSTATE.EDU (LUIGI VERCOTTI)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: 10K Maniacs, Wish, AFTP and Rolling Stone in general
Message-ID: <01GPWTYCIEBO000CN7@INDSVAX1.INDSTATE.EDU>
X-Vms-To: IN%"love-hounds@uunet.uu.net"
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

I too am disappointed with _Our Time In Eden_  My favourites are,
"Noah's Dove" "These Are Days" and "I'm Not The Man."  "Eden" and
"Jezebel" aren't too bad, the rest are just kinda there.  I like
_Wish_ though.  It's been awhile since I've listened to it. (I've
been getting loads of new stuff)  So I can't give much in the way
of details at the moment, but I don't think it's that bad.  I
also like _Automatic For The People_  IMHO, it has a different
sound from the other recordings I have of them, which is good in
itself.  I'd be disappointed if they made another "pick any
recording you like"  I'd rather have them do something new,
instead of just staying with one sound.  Rolling Stone, in
general, is not a good place to read reviews of albums.  I know,
I used to subscribe to it (for about 3 yrs).  They are definitely
biased in their opinions.  They love some bands/artists and hate
other bands/artists.  If they like a band, the recording will get
a good review (no matter how good it is) and if they don't like a
band, the recording will get a bad review (no matter how good it
is).  I finally gave up when they gave Yes's _Union_ 1 and a 1/2
stars while giving Cinderella's new release (at that time) 3
stars.  I will probably never understand how this can be
justified.  Granted that _Union_ is not Yes's best work, it has
to be better than what Cinderella does (did?)  If nothing else,
they're use of the voice as an instrument is much more
interesting than any Cinderella song I may have accidentally
heard.  Well, I've gone on (vented?) enough....

Kevin

"...I enjoy stealing..."
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 13 Oct 1992 19:14:12 EDT
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 19:12:11 -0400
Message-ID: <9210132312.AA24193@relay1.UU.NET>
From: UK04160@ukpr.uky.edu
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject:      Re: Rolling Stone Needs Real Music Critics
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

From a digest or so ago:

>> (10,000 Maniacs') "Our Time in Eden" is the least satisfying
>> album to date...music and lyrics are eminently inferior.

I haven't heard the whole thing, but I thought the addition of
the JB horns on the cuts I heard was a nice touch. Its cool
to see Maceo Parker on a "college pseudo-alternative"
album, I think...and its pretty cool to have played with
10,000 Maniacs and played with P-Funk and James Brown too.
Anyone who likes jazz/funk should check out Maceo's MO'
ROOTS album..its a smoker.

Paul (uk04160@ukpr.uky.edu)

x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sun, 11 Oct 1992 18:37:07 EDT
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 18:36:42 -0400
From: peter@bsbbs.columbus.oh.us (Peter FitzGerald-Morr)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Homeground General
Message-ID: <s34HsB1w165w@bsbbs.columbus.oh.us>
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

 I just blew $150 on the box set this weekend, I found in Madison, WI.
Therefore, I am selling the following cds for $9/cd which includes
shipping.  I suppose everybody already has these, but it is worth a try.

The Kick Inside
Never For Ever
The Dreaming
Hounds Of Love
The Sensual World

Send me email if intereseted:  nock@cs.umn.edu

Thanks,
Cliff

x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 15 Oct 1992 12:26:10 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 12:12:22 -0400
From: 72210.2035@CompuServe.COM (Mike Weaver)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: WOW
Message-ID: <921015155912_72210.2035_CHF61-4@CompuServe.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

 
(Matt wrote:)
-> Theatre actors wear heavy make-up known as greasepaint. After the show it
is removed by rubbing it off with vaseline. Hence "he's too busy hitting the
vaseline" means he is too busy back in the dressing room cleaning up to
receive any applause/accolades etc. No dressing room with a star and make-up
girls for him. There is no implied reference to homosexuality.
 
And what did they wipe the vaseline off with?  :-)  Seriously, assuming Kate
was aware of the above practice (not unlikely), then the line's at best an
intentional double entendre, that or Kate also unintentionally emphasized
the posterior portion of her anatomy whilst performing the tune (in case you
haven't seen the video, she slaps her butt).  Beyond that, it's difficult to
explain away why a SWM would ever want to be a 'movie queen'.
 
-> Please feel free to comment/flame if you still believe that Wow is
a "queer positive" diatribe, but personally I think you've got hold of
the wrong end of the stick.
 
Not particularly positive or negative.  The character is sort of a tragic
failure; the sarcastic edges of the lyric seem to serve mostly to illuminate
the cruelty of the powers-that-be in the theatre who tell the actor he's
amazing and fantastic, but won't give him the lead role, but the role of the
fool instead.  The "diatribe" you're looking for is "Kashka from Baghdad",
as it's definitely about a gay male couple, and it definitely portrays the
relationship in a positive and very romantic light.


x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:05:46 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:00:12 -0400
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gordon Locke)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <9210151958.AA22058@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gordon Locke  )
Subject: Oh no!  It's the duble postings again! again!
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 19:58:31 GMT

	Has anyone else noticed that certain articles are being posted
twice?  Sometimes with different Subject: lines??  I've noticed that
articles I've posted to the group first show up with (no subject given!)
as the Subject, and then a bit later with the correct header.  This
formula varies ... sometimes it's even screwier!
	What's the deal??

	- Gord, a.k.a. glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca   
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 8 Oct 1992 22:18:52 EDT
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 22:16:58 -0400
From: 25y@mace.cc.purdue.EDU (Pamela Takayoshi)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Who is Happy Rhodes?
Message-ID: <Bvs73J.2AK@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: Purdue University
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa


I have a question that I know someone here can help me with--I have read about
Happy Rhodes on this bulletin board before, and one night late, I heard an
interview with her on public radio.  So I know she exists (or they? is it the
name of a group or an individual person?), BUT no one I know has heard
of her (and my friends know a lot about music).  I've also been unable
to find anything by her in a couple of record stores that have a wide 
selection of music.  Can someone help me with this?  I feel like I'm living
an episode of the Twilight Zone.  Where is this woman??

Pam Takayoshi
25y@mace.cc.purdue.edu
	
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:54:02 EDT
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:53:19 -0400
From: Liam.Hoekenga@um.cc.umich.edu
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <16392476@um.cc.umich.edu>
X-Mts-Userid: W0YY
Subject: Peter Gabriel
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

I know this was brought up a while ago, but... someone had said that they
really liked the peter gabriel song that was in _Until the end of the World_
but it wasn't on the soundtrack. Well, it's on _Us_ the name of the track is
Blood of Eden. l8r. :)
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 12 Oct 1992 08:55:09 EDT
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 08:54:49 -0400
From: lishka@dxcern.cern.ch (Christopher Lishka)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Who sings "Crucify Myself"?
Message-ID: <1992Oct12.125355.7627@dxcern.cern.ch>
Summary: Looking for female singer who sings "Crucify Myself"
Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@mcsun.EU.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

[I don't read this particular newsgroup anymore (not enough time in
the day!), but I have found that you folks usually have similar tastes
in music to my own.  Therefore, I pose this question to you, as I am
not sure who else to ask.  Please reply via email to:

		lishka@dxcern.cern.ch.

I will be happy to send replies to my request to anyone who asks!]

On my favorite radio station, Colour 3 out of Lausanne, Switzerland,
they were playing a song by a woman who reminded me of Kate Bush.  As
I am not a native French speaker, and because the French DJ's tend to
buture English names (they pronounce English like I pronounce
French!), I never found out who the artist was. The *only* thing I can
remember is a line from the chorus which goes:

		Why must I crucify myself

I know I am being a bit vague here, but does anyone out there know who
sings this song, and what the song is called?  I am fairly sure this
song came out in the last nine months.

Thanks in advance to all who reply!
						.oO Chris Oo.

-- 
                                                           Christopher Lishka
 Never drive a car when you're dead...			   PPE Division, CERN
				-- Tom Waits		  lishka@dxcern.cern.ch
							     vxaluw::lishka
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:20:30 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:07:35 -0400
Message-ID: <AAsPRtg8DG@kiae.su>
Organization: KIAE
From: news-server@cpuv1.net.kiae.su
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: (no subject given!)

Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
From:  root@brill.lira.lt.su (Juozas)
Subject: lithuanian artists offer
Reply-To: root@brill.lira.lt.su
Organization: Private club BRILL&Co
Date: Tue,  1 Jan 80 00:07:15 +0200 

I'm looking for contacts to organize concerts of lithuanians
performers in W. countries. Best music masters - singers and
instrumentalists, soloists, chamber ansambles and chorus -
are ready to show an excellent interpretation of all music
styles. Enjoy it! You and Your public need perfect music!
Algirdas.



x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:48:13 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:44:45 -0400
Subject: Re: (no subject given!)
From: lionhart@netlink.cts.COM (Jackie Zucconi)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <F84NsB2w165w@netlink.cts.com>
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

I do believe Kate is saying "Sweeney" in WOW. Was there not a long 
running hit play in England called Sweeney Todd? I think it also had the 
title of the Demon Barber of Fleet Street? I always assumed Kate chose to 
place her actor in that play just to have a setting for him and then went 
on with her idea, noting that he'd never make the "Sweeney" meaning the 
lead part because he was too badd of an actor; indulging in other 
pleasures rather than honing his craft. Ya know this may sound crazy but 
could the entire song be a warning from Kate to Kate not to over indulge 
in her new found fortune and continue working hard at the music????
                    Kateness
                          Lionheart
P.S.
  I think Sweeney Todd starred Angela Lansbury???

--                    
INTERNET:  lionhart@netlink.cts.com (Jackie Zucconi)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!lionhart
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Wed, 7 Oct 1992 17:37:21 EDT
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 17:34:21 -0400
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gordon Locke)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <9210072135.AA29969@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gordon Locke  )
Subject: Re: This Woman's Work
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 21:35:32 GMT

	At first I wasn't going to shell out the _major_ loons (that's
Canadian dollars for youse foreigners =^]) for the TWW box set, but when
the local record store marked down their only remaining LP version to
the point that they were making $2 on it, I made the plunge.  I was only
ever planning to get the vinyl version, anyway, but it seemed they
couldn't get rid of that one, while they sold 2 or 3 CD versions.
	I then thought I'd justify this excessive expenditure by selling
my existing records.  Though the large sized picture book, original
cover TKI and new songs I'd never heard before (B-sides) already
cushioned the blow somewhat.  But again I changed my mind -- I want to
be able to _play_ my records, don't I? =^]
	BTW, the box set was a UK import that the manager of a nearby
Sam the Record Man (a _HUGE!!_ Kate fan) had ordered in.  It was not
released domestically here as far as I know.  (This guy -- Wayne I think
his nam was -- had tons of Kate posters, rare albums, picture discs,
etc. plastered on the walls of a little back room in the Store.  I would
visit the place just to hang around near the back and cop an occasional
glimpse into this wonrdrous visual collage of Kate stuff!)
Unfortunately, he since left the store to manage one somewhere else --
New Brunswick, I think.  So now some lucky N.B. Kate fans get to see
this collection of Katenalia, gleaned from years in the biz, presumably.
>sigh!<
	- Gord, Self-Proclaimed Supreme Kate Fan of Newfoundland!!
	- glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca
	(Although a couple of my friends would dispute this claim!)l
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Wed, 7 Oct 1992 08:05:28 EDT
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 08:04:50 -0400
From: sd@ira.uka.de (Sven Doerr)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: German Lyrics, continued
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, FRG
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1au5v2INN8np@iraul1.ira.uka.de>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

In article <9209291244.AA02813@kino.intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>,
uli@intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Ulrich Grepel) writes:
> Hi Sven (and all others),
>
> I don't hear something like Schnitzel in Coffe Homeground, for me
> it is more like "Es schmeckt wunderbar" (it tastes wonderful),
> but I'm not too sure about that. I will search for the Steak when
> I come back home... But there's another German line in CH:
> "Noch ein Glass, mein Liebling?" (Another glass, my darling?).

Thank you, Uli, for "Noch ein Glass, mein Liebling?". At the
"Schnitzel" I can hear both your and my version, as I want to
hear... Perhaps yours fits even a bit closer. But what shall I do
with the "Steak" ? Kates distorted (& supposed) german really allows
some interpretations, but maybe my tape isn't good enough to decide for
something with certainity. maybe you will have good suggestions ?

> Re: Hello Earth
> 
> I don't hear "Ihr koennt es nie finden" at the end.
> I rather think that would be "Go to sleep, little earth", so you
> should delete that line - and its translation - from the lyrics.
> (The other one was ok). Or are there actually any lyrics between
> "Irgendwo in der Tiefe gibt es ein Licht" and "Go to sleep, little
> earth"? I can't hear any!

I admit, "Go to sleep, little earth" at the very end of HE seems to be
closer to it than my interpretation as said decaying german words,
even though, as above, I still can hear the apparently german version,
if I want.
It's nice to find other people verify and improve mere opinions, as part
of it seems to have turned out to be.  (I'm becoming cautious - hm?)


-- 
+------------++---------------+
| Sven Doerr || sd@ira.uka.de |
+------------++---------------+
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sun, 11 Oct 1992 18:28:10 EDT
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 13:52:40 -0400
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Rolling Stone Needs Real Music Critics
Message-ID: <1992Oct11.175229.8958@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

	If anyone has seen the October 1 issue of Rolling Stone, they will
have noticed that 10,000 Maniacs' new album Our Time In Eden received ****,
while Peter Gabriel's Us received *** and Suzanne Vega's 99.9 F received
***1/2.  Now whereas I agree that Vega's latest deserved its rating (and
probably more), Our Time In Eden is the least satisfying album by the
Maniacs to date; lyrics and music are eminently inferior.  Us deserved at
the very least ****; I like it much better than So, as a matter of fact. 
It's lush, gorgeous, otherworldly...RS's criticism totally missed the point. 
Our Time In Eden has nothing to hold on to, and is really much more
"background music" than Us.  My feeling was that the ratings should have
been reversed, if not totally rethought.  But then, this is the magazine
that gave the Cure's inconsequential and unpleasant Wish ****.
	While I'm on the subject of new albums, what are the thoughts on
REM's Automatic for the People?  I'm impressed by what seems to be a welcome
lack of pop-chart fodder.

Andrew D. Simchik
Whose brain and U of R's run on totally different schedules.

"If he treats you horribly, he's probably a Scorpio"
Robyn Hitchcock, "The Devil's Coachman," Queen Elvis
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 15 Oct 1992 14:06:24 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:48:22 -0400
From: lishka@dxcern.cern.ch (Christopher Lishka)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Who sings "Crucify Myself"? -- THANKS!!!
Message-ID: <1992Oct15.174406.3862@dxcern.cern.ch>
Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@mcsun.EU.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

Little did I know when I asked this original question.  After a flood
of replies, I now know that the artist is Tori Amos, the song is
"Crucify", and the CD is "Little Earthquakes".

I ran to the CD shop yesterday (actually my wife picked it up for me)
and have now listened to it twice.  My first impression is that Tori
Amos has definite overtones of Kate Bush in her songs, but her sound
is harsher and her lyrics more cutting.  Someone described Tori Amos
as "Kate Bush with a knife"; personally, she sounds more like Kate
Bush tunes meets cyberpunk lyrics (CyberKate?) to me.  Lovely music,
in any case -- "Crucify", the one about Barbados, and "Little
Earthquakes" really stand out on the first couple listenings.

Thanks to everyone for replying ... I enjoyed the many comments!  It
is good to see that rec.music.gaffa is still inhabited by some
wonderful folks.  I wish I could join you more often, but work calls.
Take care and hang loose.
							.oO Chris Oo.

-- 
                                                           Christopher Lishka
 Never drive a car when you're dead...			   PPE Division, CERN
				-- Tom Waits		  lishka@dxcern.cern.ch
							     vxaluw::lishka
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 13 Oct 1992 09:33:14 EDT
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 09:32:40 -0400
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gordon Locke)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <9210131334.AA05596@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>