HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Joseph.J.Marcheso.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (Joseph J. Marcheso Jr.)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.madonna
Subject: Re: I wanna do her over...
Date: 12 Nov 92 22:24:24 GMT
 <1992Nov5.144026.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> <s1070619.721303352@giaeb>  
 <1drlmqINN65v@SUNED.ZOO.CS.YALE.EDU>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu


     I should not comment negatively about Madonna at the risk of
becoming a "pathological woman hater" however I feel that some
perspective is neccesary. The bottom line of Madonna is her shock value
and her manipulation of social mores to make money and controversy. Her
book, which people defend as controversial art is in fact rather tame
and conservative compared to the devoted true "scapigliati" artists who
try and drive the national consciousness. It signals almost a retreat
from the precarious position Madonna has held on the periphery of
public values. The book's pictures (which Madonaa didn't take) are
competently done but nothing to hail this as anything above the
mediocre. 
   
     Secondly her music is terribly derivitive and does not hail the
attention or praise that you all are heaping on it. Good music starts
with knowledge of musical principles and the ability to craft melody
harmony and rhythm. I doubt if Madonna even knows the key signature of
Bb major (Bb Eb). Her melodies are terribly derivative of other rock
musicians and she seems mired in the same musical mediocrity no matter
what style she "writes" in.

     Finally as a cultural icon Madonna is negligible. Musical and
cultural icons like Beethoven, Verdi & Wagner sought more comprehensive
(and radical) social changes (For Verdi the independence of his
country!) and they influenced their zeitgeist far more than Madonna has
or will influence hers. Madonna's only claim to social status is that
of "artist" The aforementioned greats used their music to change
generations. Madonna doesn't have that skill, her music is consistently
of cafe-music banality. Madonna's influence is marginal compared with
the exposure she has, and that is sadly because her only ture talent is
marketing.

Madonna, a decent entertainer but no artist. 

One man's opinion,
Joe Marcheso 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.madonna
From: lah@Cadence.COM (Lin A. Hendrix)
Subject: I still don't get it?#!
Reply-To: lah@cadence.com
Organization: Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 20:30:05 GMT

Hey! You out there!  I still don't get it!  Why, if you are NOT 
a fan of Madonna do you insist on posting to this group?  

Start your own alt.i.hate.madonna group and post away.  Flame 
away, whack off and say you didn't, but kee-ripes stop doing 
it here!

and BTW Who do I e-mail about starting guidelines for this group?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"I know there's at least one sane person on this planet, and boy!
am I glad it's not me!"		--lin 
p.s. My opinions are not my own, they don't belong to Cadence either
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: alt.fan.madonna
From: anderss@ifi.uio.no (Anders Solberg)
Subject: Bill Clinton?
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:26:20 GMT
Originator: anderss@sognsvann.ifi.uio.no


J.F.KENNEDY + MARELYN MONROE = TRUE
MARELYN MONROE = MADONNA
MADONNA + BILL CLINTON = TRUE


----
Anders

Newsgroups: alt.fan.madonna
From: funga@ecf.toronto.edu (FUNG Alexander Yok-Wai)
Subject: Re: GETTING HER BOOK CHEAP $$$
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 01:11:01 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.200733.4628@dragon.acadiau.ca> 901430w@dragon.acadiau.ca (Kevin Wayte) writes:
>
>The answer was so brilliant and simple we had the book by the next 
>morning !!!   Read on :
>
>Simply get 10 - 20 people together and POOL YOUR MONEY to buy one
>copy of the book for all of you (and exclusive to the group).
>
Not inteded to be a flame, but if you didn't mind having the book
shared among a lot of people, why didn't you just borrow it from
the public library for free?

-- 
Alex (funga@ecf.toronto.edu)

Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: umschlam@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Kelly W. Schlamb)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 07:59:49 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.171305.1@acad.drake.edu> dks005@acad.drake.edu writes:
>What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!  How 
>can that be....I love the Simpsons....and I and S just happen to be 
>an added bonus to that show :)....
>Plus I just thought that this newsgroup shouldn't be empty...it looked
>lonely :(.......cioa
>                       Deanna


    Well, it's good to know that I'm not the only fan of the show (I and S).
  I mean, how can you not be, it's got comedy, a great cast, and it
  makes a wonderful political statement every show.  I predict that it
  will spin-off of the Simpsons, and become the #1 show on T.V.
  Isn't anyone else going to post here?

                              Kelly


Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: dks005@acad.drake.edu
Subject: I and S
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:13:05 GMT

What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!  How 
can that be....I love the Simpsons....and I and S just happen to be 
an added bonus to that show :)....
Plus I just thought that this newsgroup shouldn't be empty...it looked
lonely :(.......cioa
                       Deanna
From: slgsn@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: dir
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:10:06 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Nov8.143928.60504@cc.usu.edu>, slgnj@cc.usu.edu writes:
> In article <1992Nov7.171305.1@acad.drake.edu>, dks005@acad.drake.edu writes:
>> What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!  How 
>> can that be....I love the Simpsons....and I and S just happen to be 
>> an added bonus to that show :)....
>> Plus I just thought that this newsgroup shouldn't be empty...it looked
>> lonely :(.......cioa
>>                        Deanna
> 
>      There are lots of fans of Itchy and Scratchy out here. We just needed
> something to get us started.
> 
>                           Drew
> 
> 

      Thanks for starting the I & S file-I'll read it everyday...
                           -DAVE-    
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: kgspence@mtu.edu (Phi Phi 211)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 02:05:57 GMT

[Prev stuff del'd]

>types.  Say, what do you think, an Itchy and Scratchy 1/2 hour show of their
>own?  I think it could work.  How about you?
>
>Chris Veenstra
>veen2976@mach1.wlu.ca
>


   This was chatted about when this group first formed, I think most
people will agree it'd get a little tiring after awhile.  I think what
would be absolutely great though is to see Xmas/Halloween/Thanksgiving
1/2 hr I&S specials...  It'd definately beat out those wimpy stupid
wooden toy Xmas specials (Rudolph/etc)


-- 
-----
 Keith G. Spencer  -  Lambda Chi Alpha Phi Phi 211 - Michigan Tech. University
                          Email : kgspence@mtu.edu
   Disclaimer: "Uhh?" - Otto the Onslaught of Lambda ( aka Brown Bastard )
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: torsten@cwis.unomaha.edu (Torsten Wesley Adair)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:20:45 GMT

Yes, but nothing comes close to the Happy Little Elves!
	(Itchy and Scratchy Join Forces to Save Christmas From the Happy Little
Elves!)

Torsten at Omaha
From: eric@soda.berkeley.edu (Eric van Bezooijen)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: Re: I and S
Date: 11 Nov 1992 00:33:35 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu
Keywords: WOW!, GREAT!

In article <1992Nov9.032225.9896@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> paran@ee.ualberta.ca (Makarand Paranjape) writes:
>	Now that people are starting to write in this newsgroup again, I'd
>	like to hear comments on the I & S movie.  This was featured in one
>	of the recent Simpsons shows.  The little tid-bits showed some gross
>	scenes, violence, blood, decapitation.....etc. etc.  But boy was it
>	funny, though I'm slighly embarassed to admit it.... ;-}

It was hilarious! The Simpons episode was great, but this was icing on the
cake.  The lumber mill scene, with Scratchy (that's the cat, right? Please
don't flame me, I have a hard time remembering...) tied to the log slowly
moving toward the blade was so funny I rolled off of the couch, and couldn't
stop laughing for a long time.  The Hitler scene was really funny, too.  Great
episode ! 


-- 
"And do you know what's inside?  A priiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiize!" - Stimpy
"You gave away ... FORTY-SEVEN MILLION DOLLARS?" - Ren Hoek
I want the 1 hour weekly Ren and Stimpy and Itchy and Scratchy show on Fox NOW!
Eric van Bezooijen - eric@soda.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal)
Subject: Re: I and S
Date: 9 Nov 92 14:58:00 GMT

dks005@acad.drake.edu writes:
>What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!

Nope, it's just that the newsgroup alt.tv.simpsons is an entirely reasonable
forum for this discussion.  There are two I&S newsgroups, both useless.
Alt.tv.simpsons is quite active.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: torsten@cwis.unomaha.edu (Torsten Wesley Adair)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:12:49 GMT

All the more reason to have an itchy and scratchy group.  While I enjoy the
Simpsons, I do not want to wade through threads to find something about Itchy
and Scratchy.  And if I remember correctly, one of the Itchy and Scratchy 
newsgroups was very active, with people posting very complete filmographies
of I and S appearances, with synopsis.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: veen2976@mach1.wlu.ca (veenstra christopher)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: Wilfrid Laurier University
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:16:18 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.171305.1@acad.drake.edu> dks005@acad.drake.edu writes:
>What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!  How 
>can that be....I love the Simpsons....and I and S just happen to be 
>an added bonus to that show :)....
>Plus I just thought that this newsgroup shouldn't be empty...it looked
>lonely :(.......cioa
>                       Deanna

There are people out here that like I and S, we're just the strong, silent
types.  Say, what do you think, an Itchy and Scratchy 1/2 hour show of their
own?  I think it could work.  How about you?

Chris Veenstra
veen2976@mach1.wlu.ca

Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: torsten@cwis.unomaha.edu (Torsten Wesley Adair)
Subject: Re: Cartoon Network
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 21:44:19 GMT

dluckma3@mach1.wlu.ca  writes:
> Considering that there's supposed to be a network purely for cartoons coming
> up do you think that they might expand on some of the current cartoons.  If
> they don't make an I'n'S show they might at least put together a
> conglomoration (SP?) of the little I'n'S clips from the simpsons.
> 
Why would Fox (Simpsons) allow Turner (Cartoon Network) to show Itchy and 
Scratchy?

Part of the magic of Itchy and Scratchy is that we only see clips of their 
cartoons.  Imagine six minutes of that.  I don't think it would be as 
popular.  

Also remember Michael Maltese.  He wrote most of Chuck Jones' cartoons at 
Warner Brothers (One Froggy Evening, Bully For Bugs, What's Opera Doc?).
He left WB when Hanna-Barbera offered him more money.  However, instead of 
having him write six cartoons a year, they had him write for Saturday 
Morning.  It's the old Golden Egg story...

Perhaps, by using a variety of writers, the quality could be maintained.  But
think for a minute.  Itchy and Scratchy once a week, violent for about twenty-
three minutes, year round.  How long before someone like Marge Simpson starts
a anti I&S campaign?  Just because Action for Children's Television has 
disbanded doesn't mean that censors aren't out there.

About the comglomeration of I&S clips.  How?  What we see are snippets from
various I&S cartoons.  The only way to use them would be to animate them into
six minute shorts.  

I am waiting for Fox to repackage the Simpsons shorts from the Tracy Ullman
Show.  I have distilled some from the episodes, but would like to see a more
coherent collection.

Torsten at Omaha
From: slgnj@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: Re: I and S
Date: 8 Nov 92 14:39:28 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Nov7.171305.1@acad.drake.edu>, dks005@acad.drake.edu writes:
> What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!  How 
> can that be....I love the Simpsons....and I and S just happen to be 
> an added bonus to that show :)....
> Plus I just thought that this newsgroup shouldn't be empty...it looked
> lonely :(.......cioa
>                        Deanna

     There are lots of fans of Itchy and Scratchy out here. We just needed
something to get us started.

                          Drew


Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: torsten@cwis.unomaha.edu (Torsten Wesley Adair)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:16:31 GMT

But at least there's Fox.  (Batman and Simpsons)

Torsten at Omaha
From: eric@soda.berkeley.edu (Eric van Bezooijen)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: Re: I and S
Date: 11 Nov 1992 00:40:18 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Nov9.185326.60563@cc.usu.edu> slgnj@cc.usu.edu writes:
>In article <BxGo37.JK8@mach1.wlu.ca>, veen2976@mach1.wlu.ca (veenstra christopher) writes:
*> In article <1992Nov7.171305.1@acad.drake.edu> dks005@acad.drake.edu writes:
*>>What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!  How 
*> types.  Say, what do you think, an Itchy and Scratchy 1/2 hour show of their
*>It could work.  It would likely get a lot of complaints about the violence, 
*but that wouldn't be a problem.  Look at Ren & Stimpy and the things they get
*away with (not so much violence, but still).

Actually, Ren and Stimpy get censored to death by Prickolodeon.  There exist
almost no uncensored episodes, and several have been permanently pulled from
viewing on their Network.  Additionally, John K., the genius behind the whole
show, has been fired, so that the show can get diluted to shit.  Really great
episodes get censored, chopped, and rejected so much, that the show is much
less enjoyable :-( Very sad...




-- 
"And do you know what's inside?  A priiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiize!" - Stimpy
"You gave away ... FORTY-SEVEN MILLION DOLLARS?" - Ren Hoek
I want the 1 hour weekly Ren and Stimpy and Itchy and Scratchy show on Fox NOW!
Eric van Bezooijen - eric@soda.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: dluckma3@mach1.wlu.ca (david luckman 9209 U)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: Wilfrid Laurier University
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 07:03:53 GMT
Keywords: WOW!, GREAT!

In article <1992Nov9.032225.9896@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> paran@ee.ualberta.ca (Makarand Paranjape) writes:
>	Now that people are starting to write in this newsgroup again, I'd
>	like to hear comments on the I & S movie.  This was featured in one
>	of the recent Simpsons shows.  The little tid-bits showed some gross
>	scenes, violence, blood, decapitation.....etc. etc.  But boy was it
>	funny, though I'm slighly embarassed to admit it.... ;-}

Movie?  Now wouldn't it be good if they actually did make one and released
it?

	Dave
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: dluckma3@mach1.wlu.ca (david luckman 9209 U)
Subject: Cartoon Network
Organization: Wilfrid Laurier University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 09:12:43 GMT

Considering that there's supposed to be a network purely for cartoons coming
up do you think that they might expand on some of the current cartoons.  If
they don't make an I'n'S show they might at least put together a
conglomoration (SP?) of the little I'n'S clips from the simpsons.

Dave
From: slj1k@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: no i&s tonight
Date: 12 Nov 92 21:04:42 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

aaaaarrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhh!
no i&s on this evening's simpsons
but a really cool `prisoner escapee' video game


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark L. Reece     |  ``... and the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, axe and
SLJ1K@CC.USU.EDU  |  saw.'' - Neil Peart ``... uh, Viv, can you, like, actually
je taime, jen     |  kill yourself with laxative pills?'' - Neil, a young one.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: paran@ee.ualberta.ca (Makarand Paranjape)
Subject: Re: I and S
Keywords: WOW!, GREAT!
Organization: Dept. of E.E., U of Alberta, Edmonton,Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 03:22:25 GMT

	Now that people are starting to write in this newsgroup again, I'd
	like to hear comments on the I & S movie.  This was featured in one
	of the recent Simpsons shows.  The little tid-bits showed some gross
	scenes, violence, blood, decapitation.....etc. etc.  But boy was it
	funny, though I'm slighly embarassed to admit it.... ;-}
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
From: asper@sbctri.sbc.com (Alan E. Asper)
Subject: Re: I and S
Organization: Southwestern Bell Technology Resources, St.Louis, MO
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 14:48:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.143928.60504@cc.usu.edu> slgnj@cc.usu.edu writes:
>
>     There are lots of fans of Itchy and Scratchy out here. We just needed
>something to get us started.
>
>                          Drew

Well, last summer there was a month-long thread on the religious 
denomination of I & S's wedding celebrant (to the effect of "is he
orthodox Jewish or is he just wearing a hat?"). So it doesn't take
much to get things started. :-)
Anyway, does anyone know why there haven't been any I&S episodes so
far this season? Or did I miss one while going for a beer?
Alan
From: slgnj@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: Re: I and S
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:53:26 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <BxGo37.JK8@mach1.wlu.ca>, veen2976@mach1.wlu.ca (veenstra christopher) writes:
> In article <1992Nov7.171305.1@acad.drake.edu> dks005@acad.drake.edu writes:
>>What!!!  Nobody out there is a Big  fan of Itchy and Scratchy?!?!?!  How 
>>can that be....I love the Simpsons....and I and S just happen to be 
>>an added bonus to that show :)....
>>Plus I just thought that this newsgroup shouldn't be empty...it looked
>>lonely :(.......cioa
>>                       Deanna
> 
> There are people out here that like I and S, we're just the strong, silent
> types.  Say, what do you think, an Itchy and Scratchy 1/2 hour show of their
> own?  I think it could work.  How about you?
> 
> Chris Veenstra
> veen2976@mach1.wlu.ca
> 

It could work.  It would likely get a lot of complaints about the violence, 
but that wouldn't be a problem.  Look at Ren & Stimpy and the things they get
away with (not so much violence, but still).

                            Drew
From: slgsn@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: dir
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:13:37 MDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Nov9.032225.9896@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>, paran@ee.ualberta.ca (Makarand Paranjape) writes:
> 	Now that people are starting to write in this newsgroup again, I'd
> 	like to hear comments on the I & S movie.  This was featured in one
> 	of the recent Simpsons shows.  The little tid-bits showed some gross
> 	scenes, violence, blood, decapitation.....etc. etc.  But boy was it
> 	funny, though I'm slighly embarassed to admit it.... ;-}


Damnit
From: niel@cars.com (Niel Bornstein)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy
Subject: Re: I and S
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 09:33:06 EDT
Organization: Heavy Objects R Us
Reply-To: chinchilla!niel@cars.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


In article <BxE0vp.2My@ccu.umanitoba.ca> (alt.fan.itchy-n-scratchy), umschlam@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Kelly W. Schlamb) writes:
>  Isn't anyone else going to post here?

Oh, what the heck, I'll post something here.

They fight, and fight, 
And fight and fight and fight
Fight fight fight, fight fight fight
The Itchy and Scratchy Show!

Niel

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Niel M. Bornstein                              chinchilla!niel@cars.com |
| 1352 North Morningside Drive               ...csn!sable!chinchilla!niel |
| Atlanta, Georgia  30306                 (404) 872-6883   (404) 551-8075 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Opinions? I don't need no stinkin' opinions!                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern
Subject: Re: clari-news article on Filipino charges
Date: 9 Nov 92 16:58:05 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: HMS

In article <1992Nov9.160523.17467@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> laa@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (lu.ann.acerbi) writes:
>	CFAC spokesman Jimmy Romero said Friday, ``He attacked not just a
>group of Filipinos but the entire Filipino race by calling us cannibals
>and saying we sell our young for sex. That is an insult to every
>Filipino in the world.''

Ah,whatsa matter,Jimmy? I can't take a joke?
From: cm119@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Carlos Dominguez)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern
Subject: ...Richard Bey..... (Engage Flame Suits)
Date: 8 Nov 1992 16:07:53 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


What Crap! WWOR Thinks that it can get any old schmuck to say
"BIG BREASTS" and still get ratings on Saturday nite.. It seems
that either they are dumb, or just frigging deluded.. I thought
that i was watching a Howard rerun, (since he did that bit with 
Russ Salzburg) before, but Lo and behold, what a POOR imitation
of quality sleazoid TV!!
 
...I guess I'll have to find something more productive to say or
do on a Saturday nite now...

---
      _/_/_/                                             _/
     _/                        _/                       _/
    _/       _/_/_/   _/_/_/  _/     _/_/_/  _/_/_/    _/
   _/       _/  _/   _/      _/    _/   _/  _/        _/
  _/       _/_/_/   _/      _/    _/   _/  _/_/_     _/ FIDO 1:278/706
 _/       _/  _/   _/      _/    _/   _/      _/        RIME ATLWIN
_/_/_/   _/  _/   _/     _/_/_/ _/_/_/   _/_/_/    _/

email => carlos@dorsai.com -or- carlos@mindvox.phantom.com

The views expressed here are my own, and not of Mr. Horse.
"...They don't call me stupid for nothing!" - Stimpson J. Cat
--
From: mcouch@amiganet.chi.il.us (Marc Couch)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern
Subject: Stern - Canned in Chicago within the month..
Date: 12 Nov 92 06:27:01 GMT
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

I have posted before about Howard in Chicago.. Not sure If he said anything
about it on his show (I don't listen to him..) but he really did have his head
square up his asshole today.. He called WLUP-AM mid-day host Kevin Matthews and
tried to spout off his usual bullshit... Tried to make Kev badmouth Steve Dahl
of Steve&Garry... Kevin refused.. Howard fails to understand some things.. A)
Steve is part OWNER of the fucking station.. B) Steve helped build it from a
CHURCH RADIO station to the #1 station in Chicago in just under 5 years time..
C) He called Milwalkee promoting his video when the dumbfuck doesn't even think
that he's HEARD in Mil-town via WLUP.. The guy is a complete non-funny
asshole.. I know some of you are pissed, think I have a closed mind..
whatever.. I'm telling you like I see em.. He's gonna be gone within the
month.. You should hear how many people call up and say he sucks compared to
the rest of the WLUP lineup.. I know he has a lot of fans.. but you people out
there have no idea what these other guys are like.. They are LIGHT YEARS ahead
as far as entertainment go..

Marc