HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jprad@faatcrl.faa.gov (Jack Radigan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: XPR-Bidirectional
Date: 22 Nov 92 15:35:12 GMT
Organization: FAA Technical Center, Pomona, NJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: faatcrl.faa.gov

Ty_Sarna@fcircus.sat.tx.us (Ty Sarna) writes:

>Point is, if it IS a patented protocol, all of the above points could
>very likely STILL apply to ANY OTHER protocol we might choose to
>implement. So, why don't we do the legwork first, and if there is not
>patent then we might as well do BIMODEM, and if there is, we have to
>examine the impact (if any) that the patent has on ALL bidirectional
>file transfer protocols.

  Protocols probably fall into the same category as programming languages,
which can't be patented, but their implementations can be copyrighted.  

  Patents are pretty much reserved to mechanical, not algorithmic
processes.  Of course, if you can describe an algorithm in mechanical
terms, then you could probably get away with it.

  Not sure if you could describe a protocol that way though, it essentially
has a syntax like a language, so it probably can't be patented.

  Guess that's why most companies tend to keep their protocols proprietary,
which is the current status of BIMODEM and HS/LINK.

  -jack-
From: Greg_Bastow@tvbbs.wimsey.bc.ca (Greg Bastow)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re:  Backup Prog Suggestions
Distribution: world
Date: 16 Nov 92 21:21:18 PST
Organization: Tunnel-Vision BBS!

In a message dated Sat 14 Nov 92  9:07, Sysop@alphanet.alphanet.ch (marc Sc
wrote:

 SS> In article <69434@cup.portal.com> jimdawson@cup.portal.com (Jim R
 SS> Dawson) writes:
>>Tell me guys, what is the currently best backup program on the AMIGA ?
>>
>>Frank

 SS> Try ABackup, (C) Denis Gounelle (gounelle@alphanet.ch), available at
 SS> most FTP sites (aminet sites), and at litamiga.epfl.ch:/pub/amiga/goun
 SS> elle

 SS> It's shareware.

The BEST Commercial backup program is AmiBack by Moonlighter. Full tape
support, fast, configurable and comes with a scheduler. 

-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

  ___________   _        _  1.3 GIG/Gaming/Usenet/All Fish/8,500 Files
 ////////////   \\      //
      //         \\    //   1:153/910 & 941 * 40:800/910 & 941  [FidoNet]
     //           \\  //    87:6010/0 & 87:6010/9009 & 87:6010/9016
[TrekNet]
    //_unnel       \\//     40:800/910 & 40:800/957 [AmigaNet]
    \_______________\/______Greg_Bastow@tvbbs.wimsey.bc.ca
From: crystal@glia.biostr.washington.edu (Crystal)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: WHY IS VLT SOO BRAIN-DEAD! [please read]
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:10:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: glia.crystal.722103058
Organization: University of Washington

In <1992Nov18.074707.24963@mercury.unt.edu> west@ponder.csci.unt.edu (Bruce West) writes:

>    First, VLT is great - I love it!  Now, the problem...


>** FIX THE DAMN REVIEW BUFFER -- ITS WORTHLESS RIGHT NOW!


>    The reason for this is that if you, say, ls a huge dir.  You then wanna
>step through your review buffer and choose which files to read or 
>something (bad example, I know).  So you pop up the review window, and skip
>up to the top of the directory listing.  You then go to your VLT window
>and type this file.  Good.  Now, you want to "page down" in the review
>buffer.  So you go up to the review buffer and BOOM.  It has now scrolled
>down the length of the file you just read.  THIS IS USELESS, the review buffer
>should scroll independently.  For example, you can't cat a huge file and at
>the same time step through the review buffer -- it just keeps bouncing
>around!
>    FIX THIS PLEASE!  Or tell me how I can fix it!  This makes the entire
>review system uterly worthless for any practical use.  I'm using the latest
>version btw, on an A3000.

>Ciao....

>Jason B West

>ps: Don't respond by email - I don't get my mail for some readson.


Would increasing the buffer size solve your problem?  
I know it won't solve the jumping around when you are cat'ing and stepping
through, but a larger buffer may at least let you keep more of what you hae
already put in there.   Just a random thought...

Crystal
  ;>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
From: chriso@cs.concordia.ca (Chris O'Regan)
Subject: Re: WHY IS VLT SOO BRAIN-DEAD!  [please read]
Organization: Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:47:52 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.074707.24963@mercury.unt.edu> west@ponder.csci.unt.edu (Bruce West) writes:
>** FIX THE DAMN REVIEW BUFFER -- ITS WORTHLESS RIGHT NOW!

   If your intent is to get the programmer of VLT angry, then your
on the right track.  You should be considerate.  You are getting the
program for free.  If a feature doesn't work the way you like it, then
suggest a better way; don't demand it.  The programmer owes you nothing.

>THIS IS USELESS, the review buffer
>should scroll independently.  For example, you can't cat a huge file and at
>the same time step through the review buffer -- it just keeps bouncing
>around!

   You do have a point about the review buffer.  I did find this a
bother.  Again, your approach is wrong.  Explain the bug and suggest
a fix.  Don't say it's useless.  The programmer probably spent many
hours just implementing this feature.  To say "THIS IS USELESS" is
probably like stabbing him in the back with butter knife.

   Put yourself in the position of the programmer.  What would you
do if you received an e-mail like yours?  Would you take it seriously?
Or would you throw it out?

----
Christopher O'Regan                                              _
Computer Engineering, Concordia University     _   /|  /| /| |  / \  /|
e-mail: chriso@cs.concordia.ca           __ _ //  /_| / |/ | | / __ /_|
        ct_oreg@pavo.concordia.ca        \/ \X/  /  |/  |  | | \__//  |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wondering how many technicians it takes to screw up a network...
From: bobl@bobsbox.rent.com (Bob Lindabury - SysAdmin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: Supra Upgrades ... A Different question
Date: 22 Nov 92 14:18:32 GMT
Organization: Raven Enterprises -- Piscataway, NJ USA
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16f (10.17.92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith

In article <willw.722340986@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> willw@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (William Waring) writes:
>
>       Just a quick question to all you lucky people who have received
> your Supra ROM Upgrades. Does Supra send you and Addendum to the documentation
> with there ROM upgrades?
>       The reason I ask is that I just received my modem back, after a 3
> Week round trip to the supra factory. As requested they upgraded my ROM
> from 1-00.c the 1-200g (as well as fixing the speaker and power regulator
> that blew ) but unfortunatly they didn't send anything else back with it. Am I
> to assume that the only documentation they are giving out is the stuff
> posted here, or am I missing something?
>
> --
> * Will    Waring |            The X-Comm Development Team
>   Edward Lawford |              willw@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU
>   Michael Lorant |             9107957@chico.cs.su.OZ.AU
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I received my new SupraFAX Modem about 1 week ago with the J ROMs
(CallerID) and the documentation that comes with it, while being pretty
good, does NOT cover either FAX commands OR CallerID commands.  The only
documentation that I could find for it was on thier BBS.  The same docs
that were posted here.  You have to download a file that is specifically
for the new ROM update.  I would rather had an addendum to the manual.

--
 Bob Lindabury

InterNet: bobl@bobsbox.rent.com                | Raven Enterprises
    UUCP: ...rutgers!bobsbox!bobl              | 25 Raven Avenue
  BitNet: bobl%bobsbox.rent.com@pucc           | Piscataway, NJ 08854
  Home #: +1 908/560-7353                      | +1 908/271-8878
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
From: manbir@softwords.bc.ca (Manbir Prihar)
Subject: Re: FAX Software with USR DS HST FAX
Organization: Softwords
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 04:25:04 GMT

In article <1ebgpuINN9o5@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox) writes:
>
>Does anyone know of good FAX software to use with the USR DS HST FAX?
>
>I'd like any information you can give me.  Thanks!
>
>Mike
>-- 
>Okay, look for AmoNER #5 on: ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (128.174.5.59) in /amiga/amoner
>nic.funet.fi (128.214.6.100) in /pub/amiga/programming/amos
>Je suis venu ici pour macher du chewing-gum et pour botter des fesses.
>Et maintenant, je n'ai plus de chewing-gum . . .

I'm also interested in this (having just upgraded to the same modem).

Or any information (example source code?) about where I can find documents
describing class 1 fax commands?

MP 
-- 
---------------------------------------
Manbir Prihar
Senior Systems Analyst
CoSy Conferencing Systems                 //     manbir@softwords.bc.ca
From: tdeck@lifestyle.rhein-main.de (Thorsten Deck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: SerialSource for Modula or Cluster!
Date: 15 Nov 92 20:51:09 MED
Organization: Life-Style

Hello!
I am search an source code for use a Serial.device in Cluster or
ModulaII.

Then i search the SETUPS for an Xfer Library to use it in my own programs!
If you had an IDEA or a BBS # where one of this is!
Please tell me the number!
BYEBYE
Thorsten
(oh, my english is so bad! SORRY!)
From: fgd3@nifty.UUCP (Fabbian G. Dufoe, III)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: Systems with networking standard
Distribution: world
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:33:57 EST
Organization: Fabbian G. Dufoe, III

In article <1992Nov18.221128.24724@fcom.cc.utah.edu> val@news.ccutah.edu (Val Kartchner) writes:
>
>   Amiga:      The Amiga does allow networking standard if you
>         consider ParNet and SerNet.  They are defacto
>         standards because third-parties are beginning to
>         utilize them.  (SAS/C allows debugging across
>         either.)  More than two machines are allowed in
>         the network if you are willing to give up both
>         ports.  However, neither of these are done by
>         the manufacturer (Commodore).  Besides that, I
>         have a modem (serial) and printer (parallel) that
>         also want those ports.

   One of the files that accompanied ParNet mentioned that it would be
possible to connect additional (more than two) computers on the network if
you could work out the cabling.  The ParNet software doesn't place any
limitation on the number of nodes on the network, apparently.  Since you
have to build your own custom cables for ParNet anyway, it seems that ParNet
allows more than two-computer networks without taking the serial port.

--Fabbian G. Dufoe, III
   350 Ling-A-Mor Terrace South   | GEnie:    F.DUFOE3
   St. Petersburg, Florida  33705 | internet: fgd3%nifty@tct.com
   813-823-2350                   | uucp:     ...tct!deep6!nifty!fgd3
From: ad960@yfn.ysu.edu (Thomas Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: What is FTP & how can I get to it?
Date: 21 Nov 92 18:07:37 GMT
Organization: Youngstown State University/Youngstown Free-Net


   I want to know just where these FTP sites are located and 
do I have to pay for access? Heard free-net has access to it but,
I don't know where in the system it would be located.

-- 
The true mark of a man is shown through his actions in life!
From: bj371@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Marc Tooley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Bloody FTP sites!!!
Date: 16 Nov 1992 02:46:03 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bj371@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Marc Tooley)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


 Greetings from Canada!

 (I'm calling from Canada, but posting through the CWRU..)

 I've been looking all over for an FTP site that doesn't delete the older
files as it receives the new ones. I'm looking for an FTP site that has
it's library, and doesn't delete it.

 Anyone know if Portal has anonymous FTP yet?

 Or how about Tunnel Vision? Does this BBS (biggest Amiga BBS I've seen in
a long time) have a connection to the Internet for anything other than
E-Mail?
 All the archive sites I've visitied with FTP are all the same. They all
seem to be mirrors of the physik archives, so what the heck use is that?
(Other than the physik archives being available to more people, I mean.)

 I've tried every site I could find. I even did a Gopher search with the
keyword "amiga" and wrote down every site that came up. (Not a very easy
task, I can assure you) then I tried them out. None are any bigger than the
amiga.physik.unizh.ch archives, or the ftp.luth.se archives (mirror of the
physik)

 Can anyone give me a hand?

Marc Tooley
bj371@cleveland.freenet.edu
From: jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: WHY IS VLT SOO BRAIN-DEAD!  [please read]
Date: 20 Nov 92 08:37:07 PST
Organization: TAP

    Interesting approach.

    What I do in those situations is either repeat the ls (no problem
    at a high baud rate), or copy the relevant chunk of the buffer to
    a file, and view it with a text display program or editor.

    The latter course also lets you move around in the data even if
    you start downloading a file, etc.

> Jason B West
--
*** John Bickers, TAP.                   jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz ***
***    "Radioactivity - It's in the air, for you and me" - Kraftwerk    ***
Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.datacomm:7690 comp.sys.amiga.misc:16903
From: dolittle@halmuc.muc.sub.org (Ludwig Hurt)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:35:12 +0200
Organization: HAL (ECG089)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,comp.sys.amiga.misc
Distribution: world
Subject: Re: Amiga Networking
X-Newsreader: Ann 0.8m

In article <0096369C.0A2085A0@rhea>,
	treczoks@rhea.Informatik.Uni-Bonn.DE writes:
->Dear Netters,
->
->I'm searching for networking hard- and software for the A500, and found
->the following pointers:
->
->	QuickNet from Black Knight Peripherals, Reno, Nevada   and
->	Amiga Client Software for Novell Netware from Oxxi, Inc.
     
bsc bueroautomation
Lerchenstr. 5

8000 Munich 50
Germany

Phone:++49-(0)89-357130-0 Fax: ...-99

They are the distributers of Oxxi products for Germany (where you
obviously are).


->
->Q: Does anyone out there know adresses (preferably NOT snail) of the
->   companies?
->Q: Any experiences? Better/cheaper solutions?
->
->Yours, Christian Treczoks (TRECZOKS@Rhea.Informatik.Uni-Bonn.de)

-- 
Ludwig Hurt,      | The first myth of management is that it exists !!
Wertheimer Str.74 |
8000 Muenchen 60  | USENET: dolittle@halmuc.muc.sub.org
Germany   ECG089  | CBMNET: dolittle@halmuc.bsc.adsp.sub.org
From: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: FAX Software with USR DS HST FAX
Date: 17 Nov 1992 19:22:38 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Does anyone know of good FAX software to use with the USR DS HST FAX?

I'd like any information you can give me.  Thanks!

Mike
-- 
Okay, look for AmoNER #5 on: ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (128.174.5.59) in /amiga/amoner
nic.funet.fi (128.214.6.100) in /pub/amiga/programming/amos
Je suis venu ici pour macher du chewing-gum et pour botter des fesses.
Et maintenant, je n'ai plus de chewing-gum . . .
From: Daniel_Frost@arkham.bbs.bad.se (Daniel Frost)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: Demos for BBS Software
Date: 15 Nov 92 19:34:37 GMT
Reply-To: Daniel_Frost@arkham.bbs.bad.se (Daniel Frost)
Organization: Arkham Asylum, Stockholm, Sweden
OD-Comment-To: Diskraker


 D > Can someone direct me to any demos for: DLG, Xenolink, (any other
 D > good  boards...)  I have already seen CNet and Excelsior!    Thanks!

Sad to say that there aren't any demo version of Xenolink, however one is 
coming.

                        _
      Daniel Frost,  _ //  InterNet: Daniel_Frost@arkham.bbs.bad.se
      Arkham Asylum  \X/        BBS: +46-8-6269355

--- Xenolink 1.0 Z.3, X-Ed 0.57a
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: tpang@fraser.sfu.ca (Tsui Ting Debbie Pang)
Subject: Re: Best High Speed Modem Deal? (fax software for AMaxII?)
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:43:28 GMT

I also got the ZyXEL U1496E for my A3000 to replace my Supra 2400 ext, from
their BBS Screen Contest, which after entered, can have 40% off on one
modem. Don't ask me how, as it was over on Oct. 12 or so.

It worked great, almost bought a Supra, but luckily checked comp.dcom.modems,
since I could get a Supra from my workplace with employee's discount. Still
I think I won't do that. I paid US$281.40 + $15 shipping + import GST tax
here.

My manual is version 2.1, I heard they were putting out a new version, wonder
if mine is new or old.

What fax software have you worked good with this? I haven't got any fax
program yet. Is GPFax generic good?

Is there anybody working on any voice software? I tried to run ZFax for
MS-DOS on the PC-Task 1.04 emulator with MS-DOS (I tried 3.3 and 5.0),
and it won't record the voice, the modem got the command fine though, a
and it responded right, just the screen showing no cps thru put. ZFax
is the free fax and voice software the modem came with.

Also, what fax software works on my AMaxII? FAXstf?

Sometimes I got a line cutoff, which may be due to too much noise. I used to
have even more, to this site at 2400 w/o error correction, but it's pretty
clean now. (but it's a diff. dial-in #, but I tried the old 2400 # and it's
still better in a short trial).

Conclusion, ZyXEL is great modem, the manual is not as bad as MacUser claimed,
but they still haven't got the CCL (?) file for Mac yet. The manual is mor
more technical oriented though, and has not enough examples.

Note to one poster: the current model (without +) are already 16.8k data,
after they upgraded the ROMs. The newer + models have higher potential but
need ROM upgrades for both data speed increase and better voice digitization.

Welcome more info, please, thanks.

David Tse
From: pooler@aix02.ecs.rpi.edu (Robert Peter Poole)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: `term' 2.5 -- any suggestions?
Date: 15 Nov 92 17:16:36 GMT
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY

In article <1992Nov12.155546.3777@TorreyPinesCA.ncr.com> jgrimm@TorreyPinesCA.ncr.com (Jeffrey Grimmett 9999) writes:
>Quoth olsen@sourcery.mxm.sub.org (Olaf Barthel):
>
>]> Also, if YOU miss other features with `term' or would like to add criticism,
>]> please let me know.
>
>Hm, well I'm not a loyal TERM user nor do I really intend to be at the time,
>but I did come across something that might be worth considering.
>
>My roomie is looking for software useful to blind or vision-impaired folks,
>basically stuff that will use the SPEAK: device (I know, no longer supported
>but SO WHAT) to process text.  It would be nice to have a rexx command or
>port to enable the simultaneous display of text on screen and the speaking
>of it out loud.
>

[stuff deleted]
>Jeff Grimmett [SuperBitMap BBS]          * fido!1:202/1401.0 [619-460-7290]
>jeff_grimmett@f1401.n202.z1.fidonet.org  * jgrimm@TorreyPinesCA.ncr.com
>  My employer doesn't allow me to have opinions -- so don't tell 'em I do!

I second that motion!  I have a professor (my advisor, in fact) who is
visually impaired, and a terminal program that supports SPEAK: simultaneously
with other output would be a boon to someone like him.  (This professor is
also an Amiga fan, even has one in his office, so chances are good that he
would use something like this.)

Incidentally, I have heard a rumor that Commodore screwed up with Amigados 3.0
-- they didn't deliberately mean to leave narrator.device and
translator.library out of the release, but it just kinda happened.  Don't know
how true this is, but consider, they also screwed up the hard drive formatting
on the Amiga 4000's.    It's conceivable that the rush to production left a
few things out.  After all, Commodore *did* improve the narrator.device with
release 2.0 of the operating system -- why throw away that hard work?

Rob Poole
pooler@rpi.edu
From: olsen@sourcery.mxm.sub.org (Olaf Barthel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: Weird problem with Term 2.4 and CPUblit
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16e (7/4/92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith
Date: 14 Nov 92 22:17:10 CET
Organization: MXM Barthel & Paesler

In article <h8p1v-#@rpi.edu> pooler@vccsouth18.its.rpi.edu (Robert Peter Poole) writes:
> What I would LIKE to hear is why this happens.  Is it a bug in CPUblit that
> only appears under Amigados 3.0 on a 3000?  Is it a bug in Term 2.4 that only
> shows up under these (admittedly strange) circumstances?  One of the two
> programs is doing something screwy.  I honestly am not sure which, but I think
> it bears looking into, since this seems to be a side effect of Term 2.4's
> cleanup before exiting.  (Otherwise, why would Term 2.4 run fine with CPUblit
> once and not again unless I reboot the machine?)

   As for `term' I can say that it is strictly playing by the rules. It does not
manipulate BitMaps, it rather works on RastPorts. The only drawing operations
are erasing via RectFill(), writing via Text() and scrolling via ScrollRaster().
However, it uses optimized scrolling routines which determine which area to scroll
and only move those bitplanes in the area to scroll which contain any data.

> Rob Poole
> pooler@rpi.edu
> pooler@cs.rpi.edu

-- 
Olaf Barthel       | Internet: olsen@sourcery.mxm.sub.org
Brabeckstrasse 35  |           o.barthel@a-link-h.comlink.de
D-3000 Hannover 71 |           cbmvax.commodore.com!cbmehq!sourcery!olsen
MXM, ECG127        |   Z-Netz: O.BARTHEL@A-LINK-H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
From: 5marte_f@spcvxb.spc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Programing Terminal Protocols
Date: 16 Nov 92 22:36:51 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,comp.sys.amiga.programmer
X-From: 5marte_f@spcvxb.spc.edu
X-Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
X-Date: 16 Nov 92 17:35:30 EST
X-Organization: St. Peter's College, US

Hello Programmers,

	I was wondering if anyone kows what you need in order to program a 
terminal protocal, such as an XPR protocol for Atalk3. I want to see if it's 
possble to program VT320 emulation as an external (XPR) protocal. Of course it 
anyone knows of an existing vt320 emulation please let me know.

	Felix Marte
	5marte_f@spcvxa.spc.edu
     or 5marte_f@spc11c.spc.edu

	thanx :-)
From: Tony-Preston@cup.portal.com (ANTHONY FRANCIS PRESTON)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: XPR-Bidirectional
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 04:59:52 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

I am just an old country programmer but...
 
Why is BiModem so complex?  You send a packet while recieving a packet,
If you have to Ack/Nack, you just have an Ack/Nack packet.  Communications
just becomes send the next packet.  It would seem that the Zmodem form
could be used in both directions.  It should be fairly easy to do on the
Amiga, just use asyncronous I/O and wait on both requests.
From: jam@jammys.ocunix.on.ca (James McOrmond)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re:  Programing Terminal Protocols
Distribution: world
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:01:45 EST
Organization: Jammy's Amiga Corner BBS - Ottawa, On, Canada

In article <1992Nov16.173651.4447@spcvxb.spc.edu> 5marte_f@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:

>terminal protocal, such as an XPR protocol for Atalk3. I want to see if it's 
>possble to program VT320 emulation as an external (XPR) protocal. Of course it 

One of the current terminal packages suports XEM librarys which are
external emulators, and I belive there is alreayd a VT3?0 library done.  I
belive its TERM that supports them.


--
 James A McOrmond - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA! - ZyXEL 16.8k V32bis Modem!
 Fidonet#1:163/165.0 - (613)521-0648 - VBBS Amiga Intuitionized BBS
 UUCP: Jam@Jammys.OCUnix.On.Ca - Amiga 3000T/25/5 - 383Megs
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm