HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: YAR'S DEATH SCENE
Date: 19 Dec 1992 22:17:41 -0600
Organization: The SMOF-BBS: Science Fiction Online Since 1985 [512-467-7317]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

  It was not the writers idea but a problem with the person who played Yar.
The politics of big business killed off Yar.
----
ProLine:  rfletcher@pro-smof
Internet: rfletcher@pro-smof.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher
ARPA:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher@nosc.mil
From: mre@kepler.unh.edu (Santa MikE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: ANIMATED
Date: 16 Dec 1992 19:56:49 GMT
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
NNTP-Posting-Host: kepler.unh.edu

>	It has been fairly recently reported through news articles that the
>animated episode is just that, an animated episode.  The animation has nothing
>to do with the story.  A normal QL story, only it has been animated.  No 
>cyberspace, no leaping into "cartoon" characters.

What?  Sam's not going to find himself as a cartoon character?

Now it won't be exciting! 

	--MikE...I wanted to see Sam say "Oh, boy, I'm a cartoon character!"
 

-- 
Mike Escutia	   |	"Holy Bat Caves, Boy Wonder!" 
a.k.a. Pliable Lad |				--Speedball, 
of the LNH	   |MikE@unh.edu |||  		  _New Warriors_ #31 
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:6139 rec.arts.startrek.misc:12881 rec.arts.drwho:8980
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ST:TNG (critiques) vs Dr. Who
Date: 19 Dec 92 19:36:38 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <3g3XVB3w164w@kryton.UUCP> ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead) writes:

>as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik) writes:

>> 
>> [lots of stuff about how Yar's death in Trek was less affecting than
>> Adric's]
>> 
>> I agree with that.  And in reference to the question about "didn't they
>> bring Yar back?", they've had a Romulan lookalike who is (no flames becuase
>> I don't remember exactly) supposed to be Yar's daughter or something. 
>> They've had her on several times without even an attempt at an explanation,
>> which is just about the most reprehensible thing any writer can do, in my
>> opinion.  UGH!
>> 
>> Drewcifer
>> 
> 
>Well we are getting off of Dr. Who a bit here, but see "Yesterday's 
>Enterprise" for an explaination of Yar's return, and "Redemption I", and
>"Redemption II", for the introduction of Sela, (mostly in part II).
>All the explainations are there.


>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
>"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
>NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"

I'm sorry, but did NO ONE read my posting where I apologized for the above
post, and stated that I did remember the explanation when reminded of it?  I
have now read ten zillion postings and E-mails saying "yes they did explain
it!"  I KNOW!!!  KNOCK IT OFF ALREADY!!!

Drewcifer
-- 
***************************************************************************
** Andrew David Simchik, registered Scorpio ************* SCHNOPIA! *******
***************************************************************************
as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: fate@eskimo.com (Craig Stykel)
Subject: Re: Quarc
Organization: -> ESKIMO NORTH (206) For-Ever <-
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 17:13:25 GMT

rory@netcom.com (Rory Hinnen) writes:
> I remember Quark! Thank god! I kept telling people about it, and
they'd give
> me the wierdest looks....
> 
> There was also a first mate named Ficus, who was a take-off on Spock.
And there
> was some sort of creature that lived in the captain's cabin, and
constantly
> threatened to eat him.
> 
> You have brought great peace of mind to me. Now if I can just find
some tapes
> of it...(hint, hint)...
> 
> .rory.
> rory@binky.jpl.nasa.gov
> 
I remember the show as well...
It was played a few years ago on one of the cable comedy channels
I was never able to record them, not listed in t.v. guide....
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: mscott@quaver.urbana.mcd.mot.com (Mark Scott)
Subject: Re: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
Reply-To: mscott@urbana.mcd.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Computer Group, Urbana Design Center
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 19:19:12 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.135228.4691@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, flanigan@echo.gsfc.nasa.gov (Dennis Flanigan) writes:
|> In article <1992Dec9.143315.25112@urbana.mcd.mot.com>, mscott@quaver.urbana.mcd.mot.com (Mark Scott) writes:
|> |> In article <mad-celt.723837687@cwis>, mad-celt@cwis.unomaha.edu (Mad Celt) writes:
|> |> |> 
|> |> |> Anyone know what day in January this is premering?
|> |> -- 
|> |> It seems most places will be airing it sometime in the week of Jan. 4th.
|> |> You should check with your local FOX affiliate for details.
|>
|> I didn't think that the FOX stations had anything to do with Star Trek.  
|> It's just that a lot of FOX stations happen to carry the Star Trek shows.
|> For Example ch. 45 in Baltimore is part of the FOX network and
|> carries Star Trek, but ch. 20 is DC is not and they also carry
|> Star Trek.
|> 
-- 
Paramount owns the rights to 'Star Trek'.  FOX is the only network that
I know of that has purchased the ST:TNG series. I wouldn't doubt that some
other independents might have picked it up too. Since ST:DS9 will be closely
hinged on the ST:TNG world, with TNG guest appearances, I doubt you'll see 
DS9 on any station that doesn't carry TNG now, which is mostly FOX
affiliates. This has also borne out to be true from the info I've been hearing
in the Star Trek news groups.

_________________________________________________________________________
Mark Scott			| "The heart of the wise inclines to the 
Motorola Computer Group 	|  right, while the heart of the fool 
Urbana Design Center		|  inclines to the left."  
#include <std/disclaimer.h>     |                          Eccl. 10:2  

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine)
Subject: Re: Jan Smithers was Re: TV Crushes
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 18:33:20 GMT

sharrington@mpgs.enet.dec.com (Shawn Harrington) writes:



>		And she's Mrs. James Brolin now, by the way.

Does that mean she's Josh (young Riders, Goonies) Brolin's mom?





-- 
Lady Johanna Constantine is going home for vacation from 12-18-92 until 1-10-93
tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu*I will miss you all (except Kevin Kline on r.a.animation) 
Founder of the Church of Our Lady of the Perpetually Clueless
Disclaimer: The U of I doesn't give a damn or blast WHAT I do
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine)
Subject: Re: QL: Two-Faced Reviews: Promised Land
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 03:57:19 GMT

billones@grebyn.com (Jeremy Billones) writes:

I took the spoiler out.  



>Next week: The Ret-Con Poster Child herself makes her second (and final?)
>appearance.  

I'm sorry, I just *died* when I read this.  As someone who remember's DC's
Chrisis on Infinite earths, this just makes me laugh and laugh.  And I don't
even have to mention her by name any longer, I find this designation ever so
appealing......

LJC
-- 
Lady Johanna Constantine | "When you remove the pin, Mr Hand
tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu    |  Grenade is no longer your friend"
Founder of the Church of Our Lady of the Perpetually Clueless
Disclaimer: The U of I doesn't give a damn or blast WHAT I do
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:6067 rec.arts.tv:24126
From: jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: TV Crushes
Date: 17 Dec 92 05:42:21 GMT
Reply-To: jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman)
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.tv
Organization: Organization?  We don't need no steenking organization!
Discliamer: Upon my being captured or killed, my professors will
            disavow any knowledge of me, my statements, and/or
            my mission.


In article <1992Dec15.012253.966@cmkrnl.com>,
Citizen jeh@cmkrnl.com writes :
>In article <1992Dec14.010525.28272@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu>, jarnolde@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu (John Arnolde) writes:
>> In article <1gg5lhINN5vl@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> aa716@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Scott Fields) writes:
>>>TV women I've been hot for:
>>> [...]
>
>Gawd, you guys make me feel OLD.  
>
>I can't believe that no one has yet mentioned:
>
>	- Diana Rigg (Mrs. Emma Peel on The Avengers)

  And I can't believe I forgot Diana.  I REALLY like her.

  I hate to make you feel old, but I've been catching this show on re-runs on
A & E, I don't think I was around when it aired.  Interesting show, I like it,
but it's always on during the day when I'm in prison, er, I mean school.

  And since you mentioned her, what ever happened to her?  I saw her in that
one James Bond movie. (Her Majesty's Secret Service?  The one non-Connery/Moore
movie before Dalton.)  I never hear anything about her and I rather liked her.

|--------------------------------|    "If you were happy all of your life,
|      J. Taggart Gorman Jr.     |     you wouldn't be human - you'd be a
| jtgorman@caslon.cs.arizona.edu |     game show host."
|--------------------------------|             Winona Ryder, in _Heathers_
From: joak@ocf.berkeley.edu (Jonathan A. Kung)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Buck Rogers Space Vampire
Date: 17 Dec 1992 08:59:28 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: whirlwind.berkeley.edu

qtm2w@Virginia.EDU ("Quinn T. McCord") writes:
>	All I want to say is that the episode of Buck Rogers
>with the Space Vampire (Vorvon) was pretty scary to a six year
>old!

Indeed!  Especially with those long nails, touched to the throat.
Brrrr!  I don't remember how old I was when I saw it, but, damn!

-Jon Kung
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Wednesday, 16 Dec 1992 10:41:46 EST
From: <DESHANE@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Jan Smithers was Re: TV Crushes
 <1992Dec14.010525.28272@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu> <1992Dec15.012253.966@cmkrnl.com>
 <19757@sunfse.ese.lmsc.lockheed.com>

As a female, I thought that Jan Smithers was much prettier than Loni
Anderson on WKRP.  I thought that she made the show.  I always enjoyed
watching her.  I have a cat that is named after her - Bailey!!!!!
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:08:39 EST
From: <SML108@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: ANIMATED
Distribution: world


In article <larne.04tg@canetoad.UUCP>, larne@canetoad.UUCP (Larne Pekowsky)
says:
>
>In article <92350.183827DEC113@psuvm.psu.edu> DEC113@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>>IS IT TRUE THAT SAM WILL LEAP INTO THE JAPANESE ANIMATED MOVIE AKIRA OR IS IT
>> THAT THE GUY THAT ANIMATED AKIRA WILL ANIMATE THE EPISODE?
>>            DENNIS CRISSMAN sorry if this is posted twice.
>
>Originally, the season finally was going to be animated, and the animation
>company that did Akira had been contracted to do the animation.  However,
>last I heard the episode had been scrapped, quite possibly due to budget
>problems.
>
>If they un-scrap it (which I don't think likely).  Tommy Thompson was
>going to write it.

Isn't it fascinating that Sally Smith has said nothing about this canning?
Could it be Hmmmmm... perhaps well just maybe a totally unsubstantiated rumor?
You know, sort of like the triannual QL is being cancelled thread...

Scott
From: pearl@remus.rutgers.edu (Starbuck)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Galactica 1980 Question
Date: 14 Dec 92 03:07:05 GMT
Organization: the Worlds Welfare Work Association, Rutgers Anime division

In article <Bz3KGz.87u@world.std.com> buc@world.std.com (Quantum Buc) writes:
> 
> I've frothed at the mouth on numerous occasion about the attrocious "movie"
> compilation-type thing they made out of Galactica:1980, so I won't go into
> it here. As mentioned by others, the only "real" Galactica:1980 tape
> available is "The Fate of Starbuck", which is worth the $9.99 it costs. As
> a note, though, the box does not say Galactica:1980, it says Battlestar
> Galactica.


Quick correction:  The "real" Galactica 1980 episode was called "The
Return Of Starbuck"

Steve
---
Stephen Pearl (Starbuck)    Work: (908)932-3465   Home: (908)566-6842
UUCP:  rutgers!remus.rutgers.edu!pearl  Internet: pearl@remus.rutgers.edu
FidoNet: Stephen.Pearl@f619.n2605.z1.fidonet.org (or 1:2605/619)
GEnie: S.PEARL6                    CI$: >internet:pearl@remus.rutgers.edu  
US MAIL:  359 Lloyd Rd, Aberdeen, NJ 07747-1826           
QUOTES: "What is Starbuck-ing?" -Adultress 19
        "Works for me!" -Rick Hunter (The Cop, not the Robotech Defender)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.drwho
From: domalley@unix1.tcd.ie (Slartibartfast            (alias Daniel O'Malley))
Subject: Re: ST: TNG (critiques) vs Dr. Who
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:47:55 GMT

In <1992Dec15.164209.24518@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik) writes:

>[lots of stuff about how Yar's death in Trek was less affecting than
>Adric's]

>I agree with that.  And in reference to the question about "didn't they
>bring Yar back?", they've had a Romulan lookalike who is (no flames becuase
>I don't remember exactly) supposed to be Yar's daughter or something. 
>They've had her on several times without even an attempt at an explanation,
>which is just about the most reprehensible thing any writer can do, in my
>opinion.  UGH!
>P.S.  Mystery/suspense is one thing; laziness is another!

Yes, but it was explained... The Tasha Yar that went back in time in
"Yesterday's Enterprise" eventually mothered a child by a Romulan...

Daniel.
--
|       //              |------Daniel O'Malley--domalley@unix1.tcd.ie------|
|   ===//  ===    ===   |---"In the beginning, the universe was created.---|
| //  // //  // //  //  |-This has made a lot of people angry and has been-|
|  ==//   ==// //  //   |--widely regarded as a bad move.":Douglas Adams.--|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine)
Subject: Re: TV Crushes
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:30:16 GMT

jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman) writes:


>>
>>
>>	- Diana Rigg (Mrs. Emma Peel on The Avengers)

>  And I can't believe I forgot Diana.  I REALLY like her.


>  And since you mentioned her, what ever happened to her?  I saw her in that
>one James Bond movie. (Her Majesty's Secret Service?  The one non-Connery/Moore
>movie before Dalton.)  I never hear anything about her and I rather liked her.


She's been hosting Mystery on PBS.  I don't know what else she's been up to.


LJC

-- 
Lady Johanna Constantine is going home for vacation from 12-18-92 until 1-10-93
tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu*I will miss you all (except Kevin Kline on r.a.animation) 
Founder of the Church of Our Lady of the Perpetually Clueless
Disclaimer: The U of I doesn't give a damn or blast WHAT I do
From: jennise@opus.dgi.COM (Milady Printcap the goddess of peripherals)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Deep Space Nine
Date: 16 Dec 92 01:43:00 GMT


Ed Humble writes:


Frankly, the fact that Paramount got a long hard look at a detailed
treatment of Babylon 5 (including preliminary scripts for the pilot)
clinches the "who came first?" question in my mind.  I will watch DS9 (hey,
it's sort of SF), but I'll hold Paramount guilty of plagiarism for any
similarities if (when) they crop up.

**********

This is a little difficult to buy. I've read a lot of articles by
JMS(in Writer's Digest) and find him to be very savvy about the
business side of Hollywood. JMS may be pissed (very natural reaction
especiall after having been turned down) ) but if the show was a
ripoff he'd probably be doing something about it. All the interviews,
posts and opinions not withstanding there have been occasions where
two people have the same idea. 

This isn't to say that I know for sure Paramounts is innocent.  I'm
just curious about the declerations at this stage of the game. I'm
going to withhold judgement until the shows are on the air.  One,
both, or neither may be crap. If they're both quality shows I'll watch
if not I'll probably still watch (kidding).

By the way.... The brief ramblings 8-) in sf-lovers is all I've heard
about Babylon 5 (except of course for the current discussion) could
someone send me more info on the proposed show. As I said I've been
reading his articles in Writer's Digest for a while and my eyeballs
always fly open when I see his name in credits. It's rather comforting
when someone giving you how to advice is actually practicing what he
preaches. Please send the info to jennise@dgi.com

jennise
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: swardwel@nyx.cs.du.edu (Stephanie  Wardwell)
Subject: RE: TV crushes
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 18:26:09 GMT


Okay, I just had to add to this discussion.

I second nominations for Scott (love those eyes!), Patrick Stewart (eyes
again) and Pierce Brosnan (everything except his chest.  Reminds me of
Steve Dallas in the torso region!)

Let me add:

Timothy Dalton as James Bond Mark IV (or V if you count Niven).  He had
more charm and sophistication than any of the others.  (Flame shield ON!)

And my youngest indiscretion, begun just as I entered womanhood:

Bob Crane, aka Robert Hogan.  (Don't ask me why, I was 12 at the time!)

I do seem to like them older, though.  Those 90210 pipsqueaks do
absolutely nothing for me, nor any of their cadre.

Strange discussion, but fun!

Steph
%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%
Stephanie Wardwell                             QUANTUM LEAP-
                                               Fun to Watch,
swardwel@mail.sas.upenn.edu                    Difficult to Explain!
%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%
From: DEC113@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: QL: ANIMATED
Date: 15 Dec 92 23:38:27 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

IS IT TRUE THAT SAM WILL LEAP INTO THE JAPANESE ANIMATED MOVIE AKIRA OR IS IT
 THAT THE GUY THAT ANIMATED AKIRA WILL ANIMATE THE EPISODE?
            DENNIS CRISSMAN sorry if this is posted twice.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: jasstev@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (stevens jason)
Subject: rec.arts.highlander?
Summary: gimme the prize
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 02:30:34 GMT
Keywords: I'm headhunting

  
  I don't know much about the workings of the newsgroups, but would it be
  possible to set up a rec.arts.highlander newsgroup?
  Do we have to vote on this sort of thing?

  Come on fellow immortals, let's get a group for ourselves!
  Jason.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: smith@NCoast.ORG (Phil Smith)
Subject: Re: rec.arts.highlander?
Reply-To: smith@ncoast.org (Phil Smith)
Organization: North Coast Public Access *NIX, Cleveland, OH
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:39:53 GMT
Followup-To: news.groups

As quoted from <Bz4KB0.Brp@news.cso.uiuc.edu> by jasstev@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (stevens jason):
+---------------
|   
|   I don't know much about the workings of the newsgroups, but would it be
|   possible to set up a rec.arts.highlander newsgroup?

Yes, but proper procedures need to be followed, like
the discussion is to be held in news.groups.
BTW i think the show is too new to even consider 
forming a group for it. I only followed-up on
this article to redirect discussion to the proper place.
-- 
"If you had left when these credits began you would be home be now."
*** [Speed enforced by] RADAR for your protection ***
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: jhildeb1@cc.swarthmore.edu (Jeff Hildebrand)
Subject: Re: Quarc
Reply-To: jhildeb1@cc.swarthmore.edu (Jeff Hildebrand)
Organization: Don's Merry Horde of Topologists
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 22:45:54 GMT

	While I've never seen the actual series I once saw a short that
someone put together called "Quark: The Movie" which had been made around
the time Star Trek: The Movie came out. Don't remember it very well but I
know it was extremely weird and very funny. It was mainly a compilation of
clips from the show with someone doing a voice-over. I would like to see the
original series at some point simply because everyone keeps saying how
gloriously awful it was.

-Jeff
-- 
Jeff Hildebrand, The Shaggy TA		       	   hildebra@math.wisc.edu
"The following statement  is an editorial viewpoint  and does not reflect 
the views of WSRN-FM, its employees, or mutant drosophila" - Off the Cuff
"You can't confuse us; we're not listening to you!"  -  topology students
From: finifter@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Tracy E. Finifter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: QL: More on Promised Land
Summary: More of my ramblings...
Keywords: ql quantum leap promised land
Date: 16 Dec 92 15:41:00 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

Spoilers ahead (I guess) for Promised Land...


















BTW, did anyone else see my first posting about this episode?  I'm wondering
because I'm having a hard time with my newsgroup server.  For some reason last
night, I could post it using one of my internet accounts, and it apparently
took, but when I tried to use my other one, it wouldn't let me.  In fact, I
didn't see my post when I signed on this morning.  Anyway, email me if you did
see it.

And in other matters, I have to say that I thought the acting (mostly by Carl
and one seen by Sam) seemed SO intense and emotional, that it was forced.  Carl
just seemed to have so much rage when we first see him (for no apparent reason,
sure, his wife is being held hostage, but it's obvious that she's not in any
*real* danger) that he would have just plain exploded right there and then in
front of the police chief, not wait 'till the end of the ep to go in with a
gun (and didn't he realize that he would be putting his wife in greater danger
by doing so?)

Also, and this is very picky, did anyone notice that the intro sounded somehow
different?  The words were the same, but it seemed to be said slightly
different than usual.  I thought I was imagining it, until my roommate, on her
own, told me the same thing.  Weird, eh?


Keep leaping...


-- 
* Tracy E. Finifter * finifter@gandalf.rutgers.edu * Rutgers University *
Fifth Law of Applied Terror:  If you are given an open book exam, you will
forget your books.  Corrollary:  If you are given a take-home exam, you
will forget where you live.                     - Happy finals, everyone! -
From: mre@kepler.unh.edu (Santa MikE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: ANIMATED
Date: 16 Dec 1992 19:48:32 GMT
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
NNTP-Posting-Host: kepler.unh.edu

In article <92350.183827DEC113@psuvm.psu.edu> DEC113@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>IS IT TRUE THAT SAM WILL LEAP INTO THE JAPANESE ANIMATED MOVIE AKIRA OR IS IT
> THAT THE GUY THAT ANIMATED AKIRA WILL ANIMATE THE EPISODE?
>            DENNIS CRISSMAN sorry if this is posted twice.

NAAH, I'M HOPING FOR MORE OF A TOM AND JERRY STYLE AND FEEL TO IT.  JUST
LIKE WHAT THEY DID FOR ONE SCENE IN _STAY TUNED_ (WITH JOHN RITTER; OH, BOY,
WAS THAT A GREAT MOVIE!  NO, REALLY.).  

ALTHOUGH JAPANESE ANIMATION MIGHT BE INTERESTING....SAM LEAPS INTO THE PILOT
OF A GIANT ROBOT BATTLESUIT.  OHHHH, BOY!!!!

SALLY?

	--MikE...CAPTAIN CAPITALIZE STRIKES AGAIN!! :)

-- 
Mike Escutia	   |	"Holy Bat Caves, Boy Wonder!" 
a.k.a. Pliable Lad |				--Speedball, 
of the LNH	   |MikE@unh.edu |||  		  _New Warriors_ #31 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv