HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: schnitzi@cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius)
Subject: Ha, ha
Organization: University of Central Florida
Distribution: rec
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 00:53:23 GMT

>1.  Defense,  The skins knocked the shit out of Dallas with everyone Healthy,
>Jason "Uncle" Buck, Wilbur "The Animal" Marshall and Jumpy "No Nickname
>Needed" Geathers, are going to Leave Randall sized dents all over the vet.
>The eagles let the seahawks score on them

Woof.

>2.  Offense, Sure the eagles o is good but see above, the Skins have great
>receivers, great runners and a great line.  Even a Lousy QB like Rypien can't
>play that bad with this supporting cast two weeks in a row,

Woof.

>3.  Special Teams, FIRED UP the skins have the impact guys on the runback/stop
>the runback,  Desmond "Heisman" Howard and Brian "Sure, I guess I could Play
>any position on the field" Mitchell and 11 guys willing to run full blast at a
>brick wall

Woof. 

>4.  Kicking, Would you rather have Lohmiller or Ruzek kicking for you?  If
>you say Ruzek you are either wearing green and white or are smoking some real
>potent shit.

Yawn.

>5.  Coaching  Joe Gibbs v. Rich Kotex, any questions.

Just one.  No, never mind.

>6.  Intangibles  Skins, the defending superbowl champions need and want this
>game to get back to the big dance, the Eagles seem to have forgotten how to
>dance.  The Dallas game showed the Skins that they are still the best, the
>eagles game should be a massacre

Guess again.

>7.  Class, nothing revs the skins up more than a trash talking team, no team
>in the NFC east talks more trash than the Eagles

Then let me add some more: are you Lehigh guys this bad on talk.bizarre?
Never mind, I know the answer.

----mark
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 92 16:12:36 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 

In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.


Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Floyd Goodrich)
Subject: Re: THE FOOTBALL GODS HAVE SPOKEN!!!
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 15:16:17 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.000132.16735@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA) writes:

>Bottomline: fuck you, you whining, wimpy cowpussies. you
>will be crying for the next 7 days! 

Since Dallas doesn't play until Monday night, go ahead and make it 8 days.

Floyd Goodrich
floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: matthew@cs.mun.ca (Matthew J. Newhook)
Subject: Re: "Neon" Deion
Organization: CS Dept., Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 03:45:26 GMT

ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend) writes:
>I wouldn't flame you for this but having played some defensive back at the 
>very light weight of 140 pounds in high school I can tell you that it is 
>just plain stupid to go sticking your head in there on some guy who outwieghs 
>you by 30-40 pounds. Sanders must pick and choose for the reasons you've cited
>and more. He is the fastest man on the Falcon defense and that makes him the 
>safety valve. If the guy gets by him... he just could.... gooooo .... all....
>the... way... By the time a DB is making a tackle the guy generaly has damn 
>good yardage already! His job is to stop the guy from scoring. Deion is not 
>a hitter by trade. He is one of the best cover men in the business. For the
>record, they list him at 190 pounds. But at 6'1" that's a pretty wiry 190 and 
>doesn't make a very good battering ram. Lay off Deion. He does what he does 
>quite well... Don't try to make him into Ronnie Lott.  But then, when was the 
>last time Ronnie Lott went 99 yards with a kickoff? 

Of course, Lott weights in at what... 210 pounds?  That's only 20 pounds
heavier, and noone can say that he doesn't hit hard :)

>-- 
>Ronnie
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>I'm not cynical... I just don't believe in anything....

Matthew
-- 
Matthew Newhook (matthew@engr.mun.ca)       |  "...get on with the fascination
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science  |  the real relation, the underlying
Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada |  theme" - Limelight, Rush
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 17:10:08 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
From: ez002983@othello.ucdavis.edu (Zahid Ali)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: BROWNS!!
Summary: What do you mean, wild card?
Keywords: browns playoffs division
Date: 12 Dec 92 07:42:36 GMT
Organization: Computing Services, UC Davis

The Browns, as nobody has mentioned because it's so dern unlikely, are
still alive to win the division!  Yep, 3 games out of first with 3 
left to play means we could tie Pittsburgh.  We would have to win all 
of our games, and they would have to lose theirs  (see what I meant by
unlikely?)  Actually, we could beat Detroit, Houston, and the Steelers,
but what's unlikely is them folding at the same time.  But if it were to
happen, we would find ourselves in a 2-way or 3-way tie for first
(depending on how Houston does the last 3 games.)  And we would win
the tie-breaker since we would be 5-1 in division and beaten each of
them twice (funny that the only team we would have lost to would be the
one we don't have to worry about in this scenario.)

OK, so there's little chance of this, but on the other hand, we only have
a slim shot at the wild card.  May as well dream big!!  :)
Zahid
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 15:40:07 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: The Dynasty Continues..........
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:13:24 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.174724.8216@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>I could put up with the "best QB of all time" and "best safety of all 
>time" crap but this "best team of all time" has shoved me over the 
>edge.  I'll bet none of you even remember the 60s Packers.
>
>I'm not going to say that the 60s Packers were better than the 80s 
>49ers.  I don't want to insult you.  But you better freakin knock it 
>off 'CUS YOU'RE REALLY PISSIN ME OFF!!!!!

So are you, John!

I am really fed up with your "Packers are the best of all-time" nonsense 
just because they won 5 championships in the bush-league 60s. Which is easier?
winning one playoff game to be champions or winning 3 playoff games
to be champions? winning in a 14-team league or winning in a 28-team
league?

Do you want to pick up where we left off in June? It seemed like
you assigned the following probabilities but had no way to back them up:

             MAKE THE PLAYOFFS           WIN THE PLAYOFFS
             ------------------          ----------------
Packers  difficult (only 2 out of 14)    easy
49ers       easy (10 out of 28)          easy (#1 seed doesn't lose to lower 
                                               seeds, such that the early rounds
                                               are cakewalks for the 9ers; 
                                               remember the odds you assigned
                                               to the 49ers to win the playoffs?
                                               .80*.80*.70*.60?)

I pointed out one major flaw in his logic that he had NO WAY to answer. 
Anyone else wants to take a crack?

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 10:50:06 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Re: Broncos News: Elway *will* play!
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:53:07 GMT

bt> Barry Trottier
gs> Gary Strand

gs> This season has pretty much been a wash for the Broncos, as no-one has
    really played that well. Elway, the OL, Gaston Green, and the WRs have had
    an atrocious offensive output. Indeed, Denver was shut out twice, for the
    first time in the history of the franchise.

bt> Ah, time out here!  Elway carried his team on his back in the games he 
    played.

  He can't carry the whole load, and it two critical games (at Philadelphia
  and at Washington) his performance was less than thrilling:

  Game             Atts  Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn  TDs TD %  INT  IN%  RATE
  @ Philadelphia     18     8   44.4     59   3.28    0  0.0    1  5.6  29.6
  @ Washington       32    15   46.9    128   4.00    0  0.0    2  6.2  31.8
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Season so far     255   138   54.1   1821   7.14    9  3.5   12  4.7  69.1

  Not exactly stellar, even by Elway's typical only-average performance over
  his career.

bt> Sure, all the other Broncos suck, but Elway's record was 7-2 and he car-
    ried his team to every win.

  Really? Sure, without him, Denver is 4-10. Isn't that more indicative of how
  the team has played than 7-7?

bt> Also, the offense was never shut out when Elway was at the helm.

  September 20, 1992, week 3 1992 NFL season: Denver 0 Philadelphia 30.

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: Re: Browns blow it. Belechik looks for a new job...
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 03:15:59 GMT

In article <15181.2b34d53f@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu> vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>Well, after losing to the Oilers with a 14-3 lead with 5 minutes left
>(and a 14-10 lead with 2:30 and having the ball) I am ready to predict
>that Belechik is going to be fired.
>
>There is no excuse for losing this game....
>
>Bill is also the Offensive Coordinator.
>
>There are two jobs open.
>
>My predictions for head coach: Bo Schembechler
>Offensive coordnator: Earl Bruce
>
>Don't laugh yet, it just might happen :/
>
>
>B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S
>
>GO BROWNS! (Next year I guess :(

Hmmmm, what were you saying about W-O-O-F-I-N-G and the
FOOTBALL GODS early? Your track record on predictions are 
somewhat lame, aren't they?
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
Subject: Re: San Fran
Organization: Marriott Library, University of Utah
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 01:34:00 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.084506.25043@math.ucla.edu> rfedkiw@sepulveda.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:

>Well they have the best record in the NFL, but this doesn't put 
>them in the lead. They are in the lead in the NFC. But since the
>Super Bowl is played at a neutral site, it doen't matter whether
>or not S.F. has a better record than their AFC opponent.

>The Bills lost two Super Bowls. They were favorites in one, and 
>underdogs in the other. (Giants, Redskins)
>BUT THEY STILL BEAT SAN FRAN THIS YEAR.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>(There's some caps lock Bait for the S.F. fans. Let's see how
>hard they bite.)

Just who's using the caps lock buddy?


Jeff Jonsson
Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
==============================================================================
--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: Re: THE FOOTBALL GODS HAVE SPOKEN!!!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:12:06 GMT

In article <1gibpiINNaa5@rodan.UU.NET> smm@rodan.UU.NET (Steve Mansfield) writes:
>In article <1992Dec14.000132.16735@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA) writes:
>>
>>2nd & 7, ball on 5 yard line, Aikman set to pass while
>>in end zone and the ball comes loose. The SKINS
>>recover! FUCKING TOUCHDOWN!!!  THANK YOU FOOTBALL GODS!!!
>>Aikman fumbles the BALLLL!!!!!   CRYING TIME AGAIN!
>>
>>Do we want INSTANT REPLAY NOW!!!!! Homey thinks so!!
>
>Looking at this play several times, I agree that based on the rules *as
>they currently stand* I agree that it could not have been ruled a fumble
>(Not that you'll *ever* hear me complain about the result of said bad
>call though).  John Riggins said something on the radio I agree with,
>though.  The rule should be changed such that if the ball's still in the
>QB's hand - it's a fumble.  A quarterback can use a pump fake to avoid
>fumble rulings.  I have to agree with this idea.
>
>>Bottomline: fuck you, you whining, wimpy cowpussies. you
>>will be crying for the next 7 days! 
>
>Hey, chill.  O hate whining as much as the next guy, but they have a
>legitimate cause this time....
>

Steve, honestly, do you think the 'Boys would have been so gracious
if the foot would have in the other shoe? HOmey don't think so!
I must apologize to the other 'Boys fan who are not as obnoxious as
some are. Some posted how better this and how better that and the
'Boys were going to beat the Skins. I simply stated that the 'Boys
should NOT be so confident. Afterall, they are playing the Defending SB
champions. IMHO, I beleived the Skins are a better team. The hell with
the records or stats, as usual, that don't games on SUNDAY! So,
please excuse my RIGHT to woof, although I am not a SKINS FAN, but
a SKINS supporter!

-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
  is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 09:50:10 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro