HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mcoyle@fraser.sfu.ca (Strider Coyle)
Subject: Far Too Canadian
Summary: (song lyrics)
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: ca
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 01:45:47 GMT

	Here is a song by Vancouver group called Spirit Of The West. I
first heard this song at the Canada 125 celebrations in Ottawa this
year. They were playing on the lawn of the Museum of Civilization on a
beautiful summer evening, the flag was hanging just behind the
audience against the wall of the museum, and the Parliament Buildings
were visible across the river. It was an incredible concert, and this
song affected me deeply.

---------------------------------------------


Far Too Canadian

I'm so content, to stand in line
wait and see, pass the time
talk a streak, fall asleep, wake up late
whine and weep
I kiss the hand that slaps me senseless
I'm so accepting, so defenceless
I am far too Canadian
far too Canadian

I pick the bones, of what's been done
lick them clean, with a cautious tongue
in dim lit rooms, I spill my guts
I'm the revolution when the doors are shut
I'd bite the hand that slaps me senseless
but my patience is too relentless
I am far too Canadian
I am far too Canadian

Chorus
I am the face of my country
expressionless and small
weak at the knees, shaking badly
can't straighten up at all
I watch the spine of my country bend and break
I'm in a sorry state

I scratch the walls, to mark the days
with my coup de tete, I'm locked away
with Mother Jones, pots of tea
the kitchen poster, anarchy
I never march in demonstrations
I hold my breath for arbitration
I am far too Canadian

Chorus repeat

I am in a sorry state
I am a sorry state
Welcome to the sorry state

         />	Michael (Strider) Coyle
        /< 	mcoyle@sfu.ca     michaec@sfu.ca     coyle@mcf.ucs.sfu.ca
[\\\\\\(O):::<=================================- 
        \<      Distributed Computing Support Group,                     
         \>     Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Xref: sparky alt.flame:14816 rec.humor:33920
From: tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.humor
Subject: Re: Where's K e n?
Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:13:05 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: venture.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1992Nov16.032531.7365@Princeton.EDU>, datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>	Damn, that was too easy getting rid of K e n. I guess he didn't
>have enough information to demolish my last post, so as a public service
>I'll do it for him.
>
>	Tep, you have been seriously misinformed about my existence or
>nonexistence. K e n is K e n is K e n, and K e n cannot be otherwise.
>You posted that since K e n cannot be otherwise, he cannot be existant.
>However, that also means that K e n cannot be nonexistant.
>	Ka-BLAMMM!! yourself, dickwad.
>
>	Well, so much for that. Pity. I was beginning to enjoy watching
>K e n running for cover. Well, if nobody has anthing else to say, I
>guess I'll be moving on.

Actually I would like to congratulate you on confusing K e n.
Those who hate him as you do salute you.
>
>Tep
>-- 
>I'm too sexy for meiosis.
Tilden has spoken
From: krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n makes a lousy philosopher
Date: 22 Nov 92 16:53:40 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Nov20.230207.10961@Princeton.EDU> datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>	So, K e n thinks that death is just a transformation to a
>different plane? Gee... so, speaking hypothetically, I could give K e n
>the shove into an industrial mulcher that he so richly deserves, and he
>would still be alive?

Yes, precisely.

>	No, I won't ask you to demonstrate, K e n. I'll just beg you to
>find a local 12-step treatment program, before you hurt yourself or
>someone you loathe.

K e n will not demonstrate, for it is not K e n's time to enter the
Afterlife. K e n does not require treatment.

>Tep--"misinformation" is strength

Incorrect. Misinformation is the root of all evil.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Leah, Leah, Leah!!!
From: SOCC9241430E@LUST.LATROBE.EDU.AU (Chris)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 03:55:56 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <1992Nov13.093719.1@opie.bgsu.edu> bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:

> [..heaps of shit left out..]:

Well Leah, it is nice to see another moron trying to gain some notoriety on a 
newsgroup!  Especially using such poignant and clever words!  I must confess
that the continual usage of such words like "bitch" and "motherfucker", really
do place you near the pinnacle of this group.  I think you should try a group
that is not below your standards....how about alt.fuckwit.swear?  I think that
you would soon find yourself a niche there!


>   OK, bitch.  Here's the situation:  It's a shame that someone not a regular
> poster has to spell it out for you, but you're crusty.  Your posts remain
> nothing more than masturbatory displays of your 'vocabulary.'  And when you
> control yourself and keep out the sickening exhibitions of your prowess with
> a thesaurus, the only things you have to present are 'subtly ironic' one-liners
> like "*You* go crawl under a petrified substance, motherfucker."
 
"Masturbatory displays"?  I believe that your open defense of K e n is a 
masturbatory display, and this probably would be the opinion of nearly all
using this group!

>   OK, OK, you can't be blamed for your shit-headed mistakes -- you haven't
> been making them for that long.  Not as long as "The Phantom."  The Phantom
> has been boring us with clever synonyms since it got a thesaurus.  Well, listen
> here phantom:
 
> GO TO HELL PIECE OF SHIT SUCK ASS BITCH MOTHERFUCKER THAT FUCKS COWS AND GETS
> ALL ORGASMIC OVER MENTALLY HANDICAPPED BITCHES COZ IT'S THE ONLY THING THAT
> WILL FUCK YOU THAT IS REMOTELY HUMAN.

> --Leah

Well although you obviously know the location of the Caps key, do you know
where the comma is located?  If in an attempt to be witty, and you want to use
such a profound statement (like that above), using such a wonderful array of
"FUCK" and enjoys the usage of zoophilia and those handicapped, I think it
would be best advised if you took a good look at yourself!  For I am sure it
would be best if you were to "SUCK ASS BITCH MOTHERFUCKER", as you so aptly
put it.  Therefore you should go back to your stagnant cesspool of life and
wallow in your own fetid existence.  Heed the advice!!!!
 
-> Chris
     --"doesn't it amaze us all, how such insignificant runts can co-exist,
when they outdo themselves with such facetious posts?
From: tilden@interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 20 Nov 1992 15:38:45 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <Bxz6qr.CCF@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@aquamarine.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <1egcleINNeaf@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>>
>>I'm not going to repost your meaningless drivel, nor am I impressed with the fact
>>it took you 3-4 days to come up with that pitiful excuse.  If you are to stupid to
>>accept the fact you were wrong (and don't reply you weren't, it just makes you 
>>look more assanine than you already are), then you are not worth the time it takes
>>to correct your illogical ways.
>>
>>Also, I wish you would stop talking about K E N and start talking about yourself
>>instead.
>>
>>Tilden
>
>It appears as if Tilden, The Wonder Dung, is incapable of accepting his
>error. K e n told you that K e n is correct, and you haven't been able
>to prove K e n wrong. Tilden, your only embarrassing yourself. You better
>cease posting until you have recovered from your utter defeat.
>
>And please keep your lines under 80 characters. Your idiocy is amazing.
>Remember to think next time, for you will only make a fool of yourself
>if you do otherwise.
>

Fuck you. You aren't my guardian, you are nothing.  And stop talking about this 
K E N guy, and talk about yourself.

Tilden
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 18 Nov 92 02:38:14 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

Since Mr. K. Ryan has kindly re-posted his informative material
on Georgie Bush's atheist remarks, fulfilling Casper the Phriendly
Phantom's request to have his short-term memory backed up, I will
ONCE AGAIN pose the the questions the Limbots have been dodging:

1) If George Bush was not suggesting that atheists are in some way
inferior U.S. citizens, and perhaps should not be considered
citizens at all, then WHAT WAS he saying?  What sort of code was he
using?

2) If GHWB actually was saying, in the aforementioned material,
what any clear-headed speaker of the English language would infer
that he was saying, why should we not conclude that GHWB has a
poor understanding of the Constitution of the United States of 
America?                   

Please either answer these questions or shutup and stop annoying
people with your young-republican inanities.

Bill
From: cress@endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Just Wondering
Date: 22 Nov 1992 10:30:34 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu



I don't know for sure but it appears that this K e n has Jesse Jackson
syndrome i.e. megalomania.
If not, he sure enjoys using his name in the 3rd person alot.

					the gmeister
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
Subject: Re: To shitCANada and the Kanucks.
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 01:06:30 GMT

In <1992Nov18.105025.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>Well Kanuck, at least my country isn't so dependent on foreign investment like
>your leech nation.

Priced the Rockefeller Center recently, dildohead?
From: robert@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Robert Meunier)
Subject: Re: Cool it. Culture Clash. Crossposted. Stop.
Reply-To: robert@ireq.hydro.qc.ca
Organization: Hydro-Quebec (IREQ)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:33:58 GMT


	I tried to create a comp.lang.basic newsgroup 2 years ago
but could not manage to find enough support to past the new group
creation guideline. Maybe with the existence of alt.lang.basic, 
there could be enough reader. Guideline ask for 100 more yes then
no. Are we more than 100 person in here?

	As for the creation, I have seen a CFD this week. That must
go on for a month before a CFV can be issued. The discussion is probably
raging actually in news.group  


---
Robert Meunier                     Institut de Recherche d'Hydro-Quebec
Ingenieur                          1800 Montee Ste-Julie, Varennes
Internet: robert@ireq.hydro.qc.ca  Qc, Canada, J3X 1S1 
maintainer: BASIC mailing list request to basic-request@ireq.hydro.qc.ca
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Cast your vote: Troll vs. Lara
Keywords: Troll, the loser snot-faced brat whines and dines us.
Date: 17 Nov 92 16:12:30 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>I believe the phrase you are looking for is "bored to tears BY you" not
>"scared to death OF you". syntax, my boy, syntax.

  Yeah. Right, Rob.

>I dropped the .sig cause my newsreader automatically inserts it. And i figured
 
  You dropped it because your newsreader automatically inserts it?            
  Uh Robbie, you're not making sense.  That's how .sigs work peabrain.

>it was slightly inappropriate to have "University of Virginia Music Library"
>so close to phrases like "you smegma eating bandwith wasting conservative
>shitsack, 

  Why?  I hear University of Virginia Music close to phrases like: 
  "smegma eating band with wasted conservative shitsack Rob" all the time.

> ...I wish i could rip your head off and cram it up Rush Limbaugh's
>ass, but you'd like it too much." But i have a special .sig just for you.

  Oh boy!  I love surprises.

>--
>           __________
>          /          \
>         ( _____      \
>          |            |
>          |      _     |
>     ______\/   ( \    |___\      Rob Dobson
>           /\    G |   |   /      rwd4f@poe.acc.virginia.edu
>          /      (/    |
>         ( )           |
>          |___\        |
>           UUU|
>    ouch!     |
>           __/
>          (
>           \____
>
>
  This is very good, Robbie!  I'll put this up on my fridge next to 
  Melvin's little tribute.  It's nice to see that you're finally pulling
  your tail out from between your dog's legs.  Good to see UV getting 
  their minimum wage's worth from you.

  -- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: tmurphy@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Tricia L Murphy)
Subject: test
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: oh
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 20:50:15 GMT



This is just a test.  I thought I would waste space on a meaningless group.
From: tilden@maico.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n--Fundie, or just idiotic?
Date: 23 Nov 1992 09:51:30 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: maico.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1992Nov22.173219.15183@Princeton.EDU>, datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>	It's all so clear now. Garrett Cress has pointed out that K e n
>suffers from terminal megalomania. In addition, K e n constantly makes
>references to vague "information", although when pressed to provide
>information, he waffled and called the request "irrelevant." (Thanks to
>Lefty for pointing this out) Further, he states without proof that there
>is an Afterlife--no specific mention of Heaven or Hell, although I
>suspect that the so-called "misinformed" would not be eligible for his
>version of Heaven. (Gee, K e n--wouldn't it get lonely up there all by
>yourself?) Given these facts, and his single-minded fanaticism towards
>conversion of the "misinformed", leads me to suspect that K e n is
>actually a raving fundamentalist of his own narcissistic cult.
>
	Also, Ken seems to believe he is a philosopher of sorts.  We have
found through my posts this is not true. Ken has provided us with no 
valid proof that he is able to obtain a philosophical state of mind, and
seems quite unable to answer a relatively simple philosophy question. We 
must therefore conclude Ken Robinson is a fraud and deserves no respect
from those who endure his meaningless drible.


>	Evidence, K e n! We need more evidence!
        Prove to us we are wrong. Show us your evidence.
>
>Tep
>Become "misinformed" and set yourself free!
>-- 
>I'm too sexy for meiosis.

Tilden

No matter where you go, there you are.
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: email from moral majority idiot
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 13:10:35 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

esp51@cas.org () writes:
> Here's a sample of the moronical email I've been getting from his
> Dennis Hogaboom:

I've been getting mail from him as well.

He thinks we should obey all the commands in Leviticus.

Every single one of them.

Oh, Lordy.


mathew
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: REAL CANADIAN HISTORY FOR AMERICANS
From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:11:50 GMT
 <1992Nov5.175605.21006@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> 
 <BxH3Hq.2wE@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> <1992Nov16.145703.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> <Nov.22.08.15.38.1992.5258@romulus.rutgers.edu>
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us

In <Nov.22.08.15.38.1992.5258@romulus.rutgers.edu> kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu
(Theodore A. Kaldis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.145703.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> 4224_5201@uwovax.uwo.ca (Dark Lord of the Sith) writes:
>> God bless Thomas Jefferson.  He knew that less government was better
>> government, and the government that was closest to the people serves
>> them better.  Is it any wonder Canada is so fucked up?

>Hear, hear!

So, T*d follows up an article just to say "ME TOO!", a classic imbecilic
newbie gesture; second, he says "ME TOO!" in a context that reveals his
extraordinary desire to make comments about other countries which he is not
competant to express opinions about (considering his frequent whining about
Canadians pointing out grotesquely obvious things about American culture).

Two, count 'em, TWO stupid things in TWO WORDS!

T*d has finally reached maximum ignorance density.  I anxiously look forward
to his imminent collapse into a black hole.
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 16 Nov 92 17:53:16 GMT
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711

In article <1427@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>
>Oh, Willy.  Willy, my lad, I have to conclude that you are
>impenetrably stupid.  If it will make you happy, I will publically
>admit that the Bush quote was not word-for-word what was posted;
> only the meaning was the same.  Since you haven't been able to 

	You still aren't paying attention are you? We've been over this. There
is a clear logical difference between what was posted and what he said.

> come up with any alternative meaning which might make this 
> conversation worthwhile, why don't you just sink back into your
> ditto-head torpor and let the grown-ups finish supper?
> Bill
>
	I'm a child? You're the one with the short attention span. Try to
actually remember what was posted before and I won't have to repeat things
for you.

William Everett
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Christ on a flagpole, athiests suck!
Date: 23 Nov 92 13:39:18 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <kmr4.281.722269695@po.CWRU.edu> kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan) writes:
> In article <960@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
>
> >
> >Bungee jumping Christ on a bridge, you can't expect the President to lie ALL
> >of the time, he has to have a break every once in a while.  As to your
> >reference to Hitler there, if Hitler had got up in Germany before he got into
> >power and made just those remarks, he probably wouldn't have got into power.
> >My point is that if people make their position on certain issues clear, the
> >voters can decide if those people are arsewipes or not.
> 
> 	My, my, my. Kevin, do you not know the slightest bit of history 
> behind Nazi Germany? He wrote _Mein Kampf_ well before he was elected to 
> office. His hatred of the Jews were well known. He built his power using his 
> remarks, and using and harnessing the anger of the German people. 
> 	Perot made it perfectly clear that he favored door to door, Big 
> Brother searches of all homes in the lesser neighborhoods. Yet, many still 
> voted for him. 
> 	Bush made it perfectly clear that he had no intention of supporting 
> civil liberties, nor the proliferation of democracy/republics. Yet, many 
> still voted for him.
> 	etc...
>
My point exactly, dickcheese.  The US president is an effective
dictator with no opposition to what ever he wants to do.  If the
prospective president declares his true beleifs up front then it
is up to the the voters to decide if he... oh bollocks, I am just
repeating what I said earlier.  Do you read what you quote?

If you stick your head a bit further up your arse, you can probably
read it through the peephole in your bellybutton.

> 
> >Well, same here but you get the idea.
> 
> 	Whether or not, I "get the idea", does not excuse making fallacious 
> statements.
> 
As I said, read what you quote mother fucker.

>
> >Another point to get you wound up into an even greater frenzy.  
> >Your constitution, I beleive, calls for religious equality, what religion do
> >athiests have? and what makes them think that they deserve equality
> >under the US constitution?
> 
> 	That is a strawman arugement, solely depending on whether or not 
> you want to call athiesm a religion. Hence, it is a semetic arguement, not a 
> constitutional one. 
>
Well?  do you call athiesm a religion?  If you do then you have an
urgent requirement for a life.  I expect you to get a clue before
acting like a plonker in front of all these people.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bbufalin@nyx.cs.du.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Summary: Moribund the Burgermeister!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 21:29:37 GMT

In article <1e8r85INN1oi@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>In article <Bxo1vF.ArK@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>>>K e n is not a fool.
>>>
>>>Would you care to wager on that, moron?
>>
>>K e n does not gamble. Gambling is illegal.
>>
>Thus resting the point I made above. Only one who knows they can not win would respond as such,
>which also proves you are a fraud.  Don't respond to this by saying something like:
>
>    K e n is not a fraud, for K e n is K e n and cannot lie.

Why shouldn't he say that?  After all, it is the truth.

>It would only prove me correct in my theory.  As to the point of my intelligence, you know nothing
>of how intelligent I am nor are you able to know.

You have no intelligence, as evidenced by all of the drivel you post.

>>>>>I await your answer.
>>>>
>>>>Your answer has been given.
>>>
>>>I think not.  Try again moron.
>>
>>No need to, for K e n is correct.
>
>That is not correct. K e n is incorrect. 

K e n was (and always is) correct.  You are incorrect.

>>>PS   If you should want a clue as toward the answer to my riddle, e-mail me.
>>>     You have my address.
>>
>>K e n does not require clues, for K e n is correct. You sir, are in dire
>>need of clues.
>>
>K e n does require clues, for K e n was unable to answer.

Since K e n was correct, K e n does not require clues.

--
Bruce A Bufalini <bbufalin@nyx.cs.du.edu>
"Blame Is Better To Give Than Receive." -- Neil Peart, 1980
"Take it easy -- or any way you can." -- Brian "Launch Pad" Mansberry,
                                                         among others