From: marc@milestn.UUCP (Marc Rassbach)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: RESULTS of the Clinton vs. Bush Poll
Date: 14 Apr 92 16:48:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: milestn.52
Reply-To: marc@milestn.UUCP (Marc Rassbach)
Organization: Milestone R/D Labs, Milw. WI

In article <9204131523.AA11173@bottom.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> aiesecrs@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (AIESEC - Ohio State) writes:
>In article <51@milestn.UUCP> you write:
>>In article <1992Apr12.221727.10992@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> aiesec@magnus.ac
>s.ohio-state.edu (AIESEC - Ohio State) writes:
<<>Here are the results of the Bush vs. Clinton poll.

<I asked for comments.  This network actually followed directions very well.  I 
<thank them for making this rather easy actually.

You also asked for Bush OR Clinton.  If you had asked for votes from others,
then why did you only list Bush OR Clinton.  Comments were SECONDARY.

<<<Also, I think we all realize that this newsgroup is hardly a cross section of
<<<society, so liberals can take heart.

<<Considering the readership of the net tends to be college degreed and is
<<(according to some) 1,600,000 people that's only 3 times the size of a
<<radical fringe group.

<I think you have this comedy thing all wrong, humor is supposed to be FUNNY.

So what is yours and Rush Limbaugh's excuse?

<<< Also, the good news for conservatives is
<<<that they have proven that they like Bush one hell of alot more then they lik
<<<Clinton.

<<Are you trying to say something siginificant here?

<What the hell could possibly make you want to this statement in such a venomous
<manner.  If you ask me Marc, you have WAY to much free time.

Again Ryan, are you attempting to say something important with your 
statement?  'Consevatives like Bush more than Clinton'  About as 
worthwhile a statement as  'IBM employees buy IBM made PC's'

As to your 'other point'.....
I set my own hours.  If I wish to work from 5:00 pm to 5:00 am, then
I will.  Amazing how that is the SAME time most businesses are closed.
Do you think there MIGHT be a corrolation between business operations
being shut down AND working on a clients computers?

Or hasn't Rush told you anything about that yet, thus you have no 
knowledge of such?

<<<I will leave the rest of the analysis to the reader.

<<A poll was taken asking "Bush or Clinton - choose one".  What is a person
<<suppose to do?   Get excited?  Neither canidate makes me want to leap
<<out of bed at 3:00 AM and say "I'm gonna vote for this guy."
<<And the poll was taken in a newsgroup called alt.FAN.RUSH-LIMBAUGH
<<after a radio show that bills itself conservative.

<<What kind of results did you expect?  I would have been surprised if you
<<didn't get the result you were looking for.

<Oh really, what if about half the conservatives who reponded said they liked 
<Perot?  I don't know about you, but before this poll I would have thought this 
<was possible.  Also, what the hell are you doing on your computer at 3:00 a.m.?
<See comment on free time Marc.  Get some sleep, you need it.  Your cranky.

Clue time Ryan.  If you asked for votes ONLY for Clinton OR Bush you've
limited the field to 'which poison do I pick?'
My above comments are about your data collection methods.  Matter of fact
if you actually answer the clue phone that's rinnging for you, you'd find
the comments made by your poll respondants about Perot back up my statement
about neither canadate exciting anyone.

The Economist put it best.
(paraphrase) 'Clinton will win the Democratic ticket not because he's the 
best the part has to offer, but because he is of moderate height among 
pygmies'  The race between Clinton and Bush is the same deal.  Neither man 
is a best choice.

-- 
Marc Rassbach       marcr@studsys.mu.edu       If you take my advice, that
MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
   Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.