HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tiverson@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Thor Iverson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Letterman and the Tonight show
Date: 11 Nov 92 00:20:01 GMT
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA

In article <dlcogswe.721434555@vela> dlcogswe@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Dan Cogswell) writes:
>It also strikes me that Leno isn't nearly as good as Dave when it comes
>to thinking up a line real quick.  Leno needs cards and a gameplan in
>order to get a laugh.  Without it, he relies on saying things in a funny
>voice.  Take away the voice and it just ain't funny.

I seem to remember Jay interviewing someone--I think it was a child
actor--and just falling flat on his face.  Everyone, especially
the audience, seemed uncomfortable.  The kid would say something,
then Jay would repeat it, the kid would say, "Yeah," and Jay would
be forced to move on to the next question.

Dave's style with kids, drawing a lot from Johnny's technique (and
Steve Allen's, and Art Linkletter's) is so much better, and I don't
even think he _likes_ kids.

>Dan Cogswell               Or as we say in Michigan:  "Dee-troit"

    	    	    	    	    --Thor Iverson
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: steinman@me.utoronto.ca (David Steinman)
Subject: Re: Dave at 11:30 - Why?
Organization: UofT Mechanical Engineering
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:00:42 GMT

nvats@ac.dal.ca writes:

>Recently there has been a lot of talk, in this newsgroup and elsewhere, of
>Dave's desire to find an 11:30 time slot (Eastern, for us out here in
>Atlantic Canada, that's 12:30 AM).  My question is why would he wnt to move
>to 11:30?  Ok, it is the prestige time slot, and he would probably make a
>lot more cash if he suceeds (but at 6 mil, come on, even I'd settle for
>that!), but I wonder if it would feel right watching Dave at 11:30.  

>I think that Dave's cynical and goofy little show would be forced to
>pander to the demands of the non-insomniac viewing public and he'd
>probably loose his edge - I don't mean to imply that he'd become an Ars(inio),
>but it would have to be a bit "calmer".

>Still, it would be nice to see Dave at 12:30 (AST) instead of 1:30 - I'm
>not as young as I used to be...

Letterman has made it clear in recent interviews that he doesn't want to do
"Late Night" forever.  He feels his (by design or not) target audience of 
college kids will find it harder and harder to take him seriously as he 
approaches fifty.  I suspect he wants the new timeslot to try something
a little different.  And he will get it.  Now that NBC is vulnerable, CBS.
ABC and FOX can compete on a level playing field.  In fact, if Leno doesn't
get his act together soon, NBC may give Dave the spot after all rather than
have to compete against him.

I'm sure we'll all miss "Late Night" when it does go, but I'd rather see
it end on a high note than have Letterman just going through the motions a
few years from now.
--
Dave!
From: franl@centerline.com (Fran Litterio)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Letterman and the Tonight show
Date: 13 Nov 92 20:00:21 GMT
	<1dme3bINN95e@eagle.natinst.com>
	<1992Nov13.142649.15014@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Organization: CenterLine Software, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 140.239.3.116
In-reply-to: dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu's message of Fri, 13 Nov 92 14:26:49 GMT

dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:

> davoli@natinst.com (Russell Davoli) writes:
> >To get back to Letterman, any bets on which band will be the 
> >Tonight Show band when Letterman takes over?
> 
> DAVE will never "take over" any tired old fossil of a "tonight show"!
> That ridiculous and boring format would simply be SWEPT AWAY, like the
> rotten old garbage that it is... and be REPLACED by **Late Night**.

As long as Dave can only make 4 ro 5 million a year doing late night
TV talk, he won't want to keep to that format.  I think the analysis
is correct which claims that Dave is shooting for total domination of
the network TV comedy market.  He wants to be the next Cosby: income
measured in tens of millions annually (Cosby makes over $80 million
per year), prime time TV show seen my many more people than see his
present show.  Dave does not want to be doing a show that is watched
mainly by college students and insomniacs when he's fifty (which is
only 5 or 6 years away).

Just an opinion.
--
franl@centerline.com   || Fran Litterio, CenterLine Software R&D
617-498-3255           || 10 Fawcett St, Cambridge, MA, USA 02138-1110
"It's not the thing you fling, it's the fling itself."  -- Chris Stevens
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: bobk@gibdo.engr.washington.edu (Bob)
Subject: Re: Letterman ... working????
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 10:46:01 GMT

bscott@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ben Scott) writes:
| The estimate I've read for Letterman's income is around $6.5 million per
| year.
| 
| This puts him above even the highest paid newscasters (I think Brokaw, or
| Jennings, or one of them, makes over $4 million).

  I think I heard once that Oprah made over $40 million.  Did I hear
  right??

  If this is so, then maybe Dave should consider moving to Late Afternoon.
  ==

  Bob

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: clark@jacuzi.enet.dec.com (Dave Clark)
Subject: Re: Sam Donaldson is a scream
Organization: Uhlek Brain World
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:05:23 GMT


In article <Bx94r0.8u9@acsu.buffalo.edu>, hennessy@acsu.buffalo.edu (DOG BASEBALL!!!) writes...
> 
>	Subject says it all.  Another interesting thing..  it seems that
>newscasters have an interesting sense of humor..  it's well documented in
>Monty Python with all their newsreaders getting into the show, and as we have
>seen Tom Brokaw is a comedic talent not to be taken lightly.  I wonder how
>many anchormen have a deep inner fantasy to go on the air and just go
>absolutely nuts. 

This reminds me of something Stephen King said once ... that he watches
Dan Rather because he's certain that one day, Dan is suddenly going to
go wide-eyed and scream and laugh at the camera ... a followup to the
"what's the frequency Kenneth" incident, live ....

Now THERE'S a guest that Dave should have on TV - Stephen King.

Dave Clark                                "We're not hitchhiking anymore ...
clark@dedsho.enet.doc.com		   we're RIDING!"
From: nvats@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Dave at 11:30 - Why?
Date: 12 Nov 92 01:36:20 -0400
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Recently there has been a lot of talk, in this newsgroup and elsewhere, of
Dave's desire to find an 11:30 time slot (Eastern, for us out here in
Atlantic Canada, that's 12:30 AM).  My question is why would he wnt to move
to 11:30?  Ok, it is the prestige time slot, and he would probably make a
lot more cash if he suceeds (but at 6 mil, come on, even I'd settle for
that!), but I wonder if it would feel right watching Dave at 11:30.  

I think that Dave's cynical and goofy little show would be forced to
pander to the demands of the non-insomniac viewing public and he'd
probably loose his edge - I don't mean to imply that he'd become an Ars(inio),
but it would have to be a bit "calmer".

Still, it would be nice to see Dave at 12:30 (AST) instead of 1:30 - I'm
not as young as I used to be...

Well, gotta go, Dave's on...


Nipun Vats
Physics Department, Dalhousie University
e-mail: nvats@ac.dal.ca
From: jarvis1879@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Letterman tickets?
Date: 8 Nov 92 00:27:33 -0600
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

        I am asking for Letterman fans and Saturday Night Live fans alike,
basically anybody in NYC that feels like calling up to see how one would go
about obtaining tickets for these shows.  Does one write for them or call, how
much do they cost or are they free if you write, and can you pick the date of
show or is it left up to luck?  I'll try and check this newsgroup but if
someone would like to e-mail, then if I had any questions I could have someone
to contact.
                                        Many Thanks,
                                          Jay

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: cs17530@gaia.ecs.csus.edu ()
Subject: Dave on NBC News
Organization: California State University, Sacramento
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 02:36:09 GMT

Hey, fans!  

	Did you all see Dave on NBC Nightly News for Friday, November
6th?  It was great.  He was in a uniform (like a pilot's) and talked
about how Daylight Savings Time should be optional!  He even made a
remark about "Good Luck"  to Tom.  

				Excited about the Unexpected,


-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
      __________        cs17530@athena.ecs.csus.edu
     /         /|      
    /         / |       Potatoes (baked, mashed, french fries, steamed)
   /_________/  *       Late Night, Air Hockey, SW Engineering, Indigo Girls,
      |____|            Bicycling (RB-1), Erasure, Pet Shop Boys, Ms. Ryder, 
                        Dracula: "Love Never Dies", Orson Scott Card,
     June '93           thirtysomething, Writing (creative and philosophical),
"And I am outta here!"  ABC World News Now.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: selent@fraser.sfu.ca (Frank S.)
Subject: Larry Bud
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: alt
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 06:38:36 GMT


I was watching CBS Saturday morning and I saw this show which had Larry
Bud in it.  It was a very strange show.  It had something to do with
scouts since he was dressed up as one.  

I think the name of the show is _Amazing Live Sea Monkeys_.  If that
is the show it aired at 11am in the morning on CBS.  

Anybody ever see this?

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: cmrtcv@elroy.uh.edu (92F09797)
Subject: Top Ten List 11-12-92
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: Richard Burk
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 06:26:00 GMT


                         TOP TEN SIGNS THAT NOONE LIKES YOU
   10. Every time someone gives you their phone number it begins
       "555..."
    9. No echo when you yell from edge of Grand Canyon
    8. Every New Year's Party you go to breaks up around 10:30
    7. When playing touch football, you always seem to be "going
       long."
    6. National Council of Churches agrees that God listens to all
       prayers except yours.
    5. Your parents introduce you as "an acquiantance."
    4. You missed easy grounder to lose 6th game of the 1986
       World Series
    3. Your name is Richard Burk, you're from Long Island and
       you're sitting in the studio audience right now
    2. M.C.I. operator laughs hysterically when you ask about
       the "Friends & Family Plan"
    1. Soup for One 

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams)
Subject: Re: Dave at 11:30 - Why?
Organization: Utopia Planitia Starfleet Yards, Mars
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 14:28:08 GMT


nvats@ac.dal.ca writes:
 >Recently there has been a lot of talk, in this newsgroup and elsewhere, 
 >of Dave's desire to find an 11:30 time slot 
Absolutely!

 >My question is why would he wnt to move to 11:30?  

For RATINGS.  The later a late night show is on, the fewer viewers there are.

 >it is the prestige time slot, and he would probably make a
 >lot more cash if he suceeds 

Exactly.  Dave deserves to have as many people watching him as possible.
WHY should totally PATHETIC unfunny losers like assenio get a good time
slot, when DAVE is stuck on when quite a few people can't watch him??

 >but I wonder if it would feel right watching Dave at 11:30.  

Oh, geez!  Give me a break.  If it is a "problem" for you, 
then simply TAPE the show and watch it an hour later!  :->

 >I think that Dave's cynical and goofy little show would be forced to
 >pander to the demands of the non-insomniac viewing public and he'd
 >probably loose his edge 

No way!  Such a move would give Dave a BIG boost all around.  Things would 
only get BETTER.  I'm sure they would also get a much bigger *budget*, 
which might let them do more of those incredibly funny location shoots.

 > I don't mean to imply that he'd become an Ars(inio),

Ugh... that would be biologically IMPOSSIBLE!  Remember, Dave has TALENT!!

 >but it would have to be a bit "calmer".
Never.  

Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: st1p8@rosie.uh.edu 
Subject: Re: Top Ten List 11-4-92
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords:  Hyp-mo-tized
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 16:52:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.072557.21451@menudo.uh.edu>, cmrtcv@rosie.uh.edu (92F09797) writes...
>Here it is:
>       Top 10 Signs That Bill Clinton Has Gone Mad with Power
>         10.  Ruled that Hawaii isn't really a state.
>          9.  Has been asking staff members: "Do I get to be on
>               the dollar bills and stuff?"
>          8.  Has promised that Amtrak will run on time.
>          7.  Faxed photos of his head to Mt. Rushmore.
>          6.  First Cabinet appointment: Elle McPherson.
>          5.  In front of cheering crowd in Little Rock, bit off
>              3 of his own fingers.
>          4.  Ripped down Dan Quayle's drawings from the White House
>              refrigerator.
>          3.  Banished Ross Perot to a Mexican zoo.
>          2.  Announced that on special days, he will serve as First
>              Lady.
>          1.  Keeps calling this country "Clintonia"!
> 
> 
> 

So, are you taking over the posting duties or what?  Bravo!
From: davoli@natinst.com (Russell Davoli)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Letterman and the Tonight show
Date: 9 Nov 1992 13:27:39 -0600
Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: eagle.natinst.com

In article <1992Nov7.200356.16658@samba.oit.unc.edu> Edgar.Estrada@launchpad.unc.edu (Edgar Estrada) writes:
>I understand that if Leno's ratings don't improve then NBC will give the
>job to letterman.
>Has anybody heard about this?
>I like Leno but I wish he would get a new band. I can't seem to get into
>it. To me, it looks like x number of friends getting together for a jam but
>not like a band that fits together.

I think Jay's band is quite good, but we don't usually hear anything from them.
At least much besides the little transition between the monologue and Jay
sitting at his desk and the bits going to and from commercials.  I like this
band much better than Johnny's big band.  My only complaint with the Tonight
Show Band is that it seems like half the time when I watch that the music they
play right after the monologue seems too subdued, so that what momentum Jay
picks up at the end of monologue gets sucked away -- even Jay seems to fade
a bit after these.  As for personalities, I'm glad we don't have to suffer
through any more of Doc Severinson's clothes, but Doc had much more personality
when Johnny asked him a question than Branford has ever shown.  I guess we
win some and lose some.

To get back to Letterman, any bets on which band will be the Tonight Show
band when Letterman takes over?

-- Russell Davoli
From: cmrtcv@elroy.uh.edu (92F09797)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Top Ten List 11-12-92
Keywords: Richard Burk
Date: 13 Nov 92 16:12:00 GMT
Organization: University of Houston
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <13NOV199200263220@elroy.uh.edu>, cmrtcv@elroy.uh.edu (92F09797) writes...
> 
>                         TOP TEN SIGNS THAT NOONE LIKES YOU
>   10. Every time someone gives you their phone number it begins
>       "555..."
>    9. No echo when you yell from edge of Grand Canyon
>    8. Every New Year's Party you go to breaks up around 10:30
>    7. When playing touch football, you always seem to be "going
>       long."
>    6. National Council of Churches agrees that God listens to all
>       prayers except yours.
>    5. Your parents introduce you as "an acquiantance."
>    4. You missed easy grounder to lose 6th game of the 1986
>       World Series
>    3. Your name is Richard Burk, you're from Long Island and
>       you're sitting in the studio audience right now
>    2. M.C.I. operator laughs hysterically when you ask about
>       the "Friends & Family Plan"
>    1. Soup for One

       Sorry, I made an error...the number one reason should be:
      1. Three words: Soup for One


> 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: selent@fraser.sfu.ca (Frank S.)
Subject: What the hell, let's all go home!
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 00:55:13 GMT

In article <bmaple.06we@burner.com> bmaple@burner.com (Bob Maple) writes:
>
>                                      .o ____~~~~_____~.
>                                   ..(                  )....
>                                  (   Let's do the Top Ten  ))
>                  .ooo.          (                          .  ) .
>                 / ))' \         ( list, and then, what the hell, )
>                 { , , }       'o (                              )
>                (  "_"  )   ..o'   (o..   let's all go home!  .)
>                 " .o. "              .(.                     ) )
>             .---/\___//\----.           .(.~~~        ___...) o
>            ^"  .\  Y  |.     ?.              .o -------o.
>            :    .\ ^  |.      `>.
>            ;   \  /^\ |.    k.   >..
>            ;   |  /^\  \   " t..   `>.
>            ;   \  /^\   | ./   "q..   `..
>            l   k  /^\    \./:     ""q..  `\
>     ________\   "~~~~...._\/_/________`\\_/===.,___________
>              \,,,.../~~~~s                 &~~~s
>

Dave has said many times, _What the hell, let's all go home_ but has 
he actually ever done that.  He says it very often and it's always an
idle threat, he should do it one day especially now, its hurting to
watch him now.  


"I got something to say
 I killed your baby today. "     -MetallicA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: bscott@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ben Scott)
Subject: Re: Letterman ... working????
Summary: I make that much every time I BLINK... 
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 19:14:19 GMT

In article <BxBz7q.I9C@umassd.edu> rolls@cis.umassd.edu (Frank Pinto) writes:
>Another question is :
>In addition of not being on his show half of
>the time (reruns, reruns......)
>How much is "he" paid?

The estimate I've read for Letterman's income is around $6.5 million per
year.

This puts him above even the highest paid newscasters (I think Brokaw, or
Jennings, or one of them, makes over $4 million).

.                            <<<<Infinite K>>>>

--
|Ben Scott, professional goof-off and consultant at The Raster Image, Denver|
|Internet bscott@nyx.cs.du.edu, or call the Arvada 68K BBS at (303)424-6208.| 
|"Don't tug on that - you never know what ][The Raster Image IS responsible |
|it might be attached to." Buckaroo Banzai][for everything I say! | *Amiga* |
From: rgm@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Rob Menke)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Dave at 11:30 - Why?
Date: 13 Nov 92 14:20:44
Organization: TEAM CS -- Making Tomorrow's Mistakes Today!
	<1992Nov13.142808.15090@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
	<1992Nov13.192637.26232@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cory.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: mperlman@nyx.cs.du.edu's message of 13 Nov 92 19:26:37 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.192637.26232@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
mperlman@nyx.cs.du.edu (Marshal "Airborne" Perlman) asks why Arsenio
is on at differing times in differing places.

In one word:  Syndication.

(Here, in the Bay Area, it's on at 10:30, in order to cope with the
incredible shifting prime time.)
--
"This disc will self-destruct in	|  Robert Menke
 five seconds.  Good luck, Jim."	|    rgm@cory.berkeley.edu
					|    ...!ucbvax!cory.berkeley.edu!rgm
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams)
Subject: Re: Letterman and the Tonight show
Organization: Utopia Planitia Starfleet Yards, Mars
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 14:26:49 GMT


davoli@natinst.com (Russell Davoli) writes:
 >I think Jay's band is quite good, but we don't usually hear anything from 
 >them.  I like this band much better than Johnny's big band.  

Ugh...  whatever Jay does is better than johnny's ANYTHING.

 >As for personalities, I'm glad we don't have to suffer through any 
 >more of Doc Severinson's clothes, 

Heh.  "suffer" is certainly the correct word when it comes to those
awful old pathetic fools "doc", johnny, and that horrible pig ed.
They should have all been taken off the air a decade ago...

 >but Doc had much more personality when Johnny asked him a question 
 >than Branford has ever shown.  I guess we win some and lose some.

But who the hell wants to see "docs" personality?  It was sickening!  :->

 >To get back to Letterman, any bets on which band will be the 
 >Tonight Show band when Letterman takes over?

DAVE will never "take over" any tired old fossil of a "tonight show"!
That ridiculous and boring format would simply be SWEPT AWAY, like the
rotten old garbage that it is... and be REPLACED by **Late Night**.
From: gdg@r2d2.eeap.cwru.edu (Gregory D. Glosser)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Ticket info
Date: 12 Nov 1992 21:17:36 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.eeap.cwru.edu


Hello,

	I am planning a trip to NYC.  Does anyone know
how to get tickets for the show?  Someone told me you had
to write for them.  Is this true?  If so, how far in advance
do you have to write?

Another person told me you could stand in line the morming of the show.
Has anybody done this?  Any info would be appreciated.


- Greg Glosser
  gdg@r2d2.eeap.cwru.edu
From: sarty@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Jay A. DeSart)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
Subject: Re: Dave on NBC News
Date: 11 Nov 1992 06:43:10 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.30

In article <1992Nov7.023609.11288@csusac.csus.edu> cs17530@gaia.ecs.csus.edu () writes:
>Hey, fans!  
>
>	Did you all see Dave on NBC Nightly News for Friday, November
>6th?  It was great.  He was in a uniform (like a pilot's) and talked
>about how Daylight Savings Time should be optional!  He even made a
>remark about "Good Luck"  to Tom.  
>

Yes!  I was trying to figure out what he was doing wearing that uniform.
Not that he really needed a reason, though.  I haven't seen LNWDL since.
Has there been any mention of it?

"For you it would be, say, 3:00 and for me it would be 2:00 and that would
be all right."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jay A. DeSart                           "I speak. . .not with any sense of
Dept of Political Science            futility, but with a panicky conviction
Bolton 617a  UW-Milwaukee            of the absolute meaninglessness of
(414) 229-4484                       existence which could easily be
				     misinterpreted as pessimism."
                                                             Woody Allen

. . . And several butcher's aprons.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman
From: tiverson@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Thor Iverson)
Subject: Re: Letterman and the Tonight show
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:34:36 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.200356.16658@samba.oit.unc.edu> Edgar.Estrada@launchpad.unc.edu (Edgar Estrada) writes:
>I like Leno but I wish he would get a new band. I can't seem to get into
>it. To me, it looks like x number of friends getting together for a jam but
>not like a band that fits together.

I have to disagree...

The Tonight Show Band is by far the best _stand alone_ band on
television (yes, even better than "The Heights"...).  Dave's
band (I refuse to type TWMDB) is the best at accompanying other
musicians (usually making them sound better), but I truly enjoy
listening to Branford and the boys, and wish they would play more
by themselves.

Arsenio's band just sucks.  The only legitimate musician among them
is Chuck (the drummer).

As for the Tonight Show band not "coming together," I would guess
that's more a function of rehearsal time.  The songs they play on
a single day's rehearsal (if that) are quite a bit more complex than
any of the songs TWMDB plays.  Besides, TWMDB is made up of long-time
session musicians, which is great training for this kind of work.

						Thor Iverson
Newsgroups: alt.fan.letterman