HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jwh@citi.umich.edu (Jim Howe)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.elections,ba.politics,co.politics,ne.politics,nj.politics,or.politics,ny.politics,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: A new tax system ... was Vote...
Date: 5 Nov 92 22:14:20 GMT
Reply-To: jwh@citi.umich.edu
Organization: IFS Project, University of Michigan

In article <JTURNER.92Nov5105638@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu>, jturner@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu (Jeffrey Turner) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov4.192104.8209@ncar.ucar.edu> pack@acd.acd.ucar.edu (Daniel Packman) writes:
|> 
|> > I
|> >  agree with other posters that we should overhaul the tax system entirely
|> >  and tax consumption, not income.
|> 
|> 	Great, a truly regressive tax scheme.  Why don't we just take
|> Jonathan Swift's advice and eat the poor.  Thank goodness Clinton won
|> on the strength of people who oppose just such me-ism.
|> 

I think I can safely call this a knee-jerk reaction.  It is entirely
feasible to design a consumption based tax which excludes a certain
level of consumption.  Poor people would pay no taxes.  Only those
who could afford to reach the exemption threshold would pay taxes.
Beyond that point, the more you spent, the more you paid.
There was a brief description of such a plan in the WSJ a couple
of weeks ago.  Such a plan properly rewards saving and investment
and still prevents the regressive nature of a simple consumption
tax that most people would be against.


James W. Howe                  internet: jwh@citi.umich.edu
University of Michigan             uucp: uunet!mailrus!citi.umich.edu!jwh
Ann Arbor, MI   48103-4943         
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.elections,ba.politics,co.politics,ne.politics,nj.politics,or.politics,ny.politics,talk.politics.misc
From: mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Mark Wilson)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: VOTE, BABY, VOTE!
Date: 9 Nov 92 15:16:36 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: NCR Engineering and Manufacturing Atlanta -- Atlanta, GA

In <JTURNER.92Nov6183144@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu> jturner@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu (Jeffrey Turner) writes:

>In article <1992Nov6.154034.17906@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> whs70@dancer.uucp (22501-sohl) writes:


|>> A point you do not acknowledge is that the value of your money due
|>> to inflation goes down over time and there is NO current way to
|>> offset that without paying taxes on the "dividends" you get if yoiu
|>> invest your money.  The capital gains tax would be more acceptable
|>> if it allowed for an adjustment of your initial dollar investment
|>> based on inflation.  Example: I buy a house for cash $200,000.
|>> Ten years from now I sell it for $300,000.  Why should I pay 
|>> capital gains on $100,000 IF the inflation rate has essentially
|>> offset that added $100,000 value of the home? 

|>	But if someone else took the same money and put it in
|>a mattress for ten years the government wouldn't pay them the
|>difference in value at the end of that time.  Thems the breaks.
|>Everyone loses money to inflation whether or not they invest.

I thought the whole idea was to encourage investment.  Indexing will
do this.  Of course if the government prefers that everybody keep their
money in their mattresses, then the current policy is doing just fine.

BTW, I believe that interest income should also be indexed.
This will cover those people who keep their money in a checking account
instead of their mattress.

-- 
Mob rule doesn't become any prettier, just because the mob start to call itself
a government.
It ain't charity if you are using someone else's money.
Mark.Wilson@AtlantaGA.NCR.com
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
From: fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis)
Subject: Re: Carter, Inflation, OPEC, energy policy
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 19:42:14 GMT
Organization: Austerlitz, Gershovitz, and Carmichael

Matt Landrum writes:
>MMB3@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>
>   Hi. Could some sane rational grownup, someone perhaps who was a literate
>   nonpartisan adult during the Carter years please connect the above
>   concepts.  I am oh so very confused about the economy under Carter and
>   just how much he was responsible for the high inflation rates.  What did
>   he do specifically that made them so high, or fail to do to lower them.
> 
>A recent Louis Rukheyeser (sp?) column suggested that the Carter
>administration provided a stimulus to the economy after it had
>already turned the corner which accelerated and exaggerated
>the return to inflation (and the rate of inflation that would
>be expected).

Not to put the Carter before the hearse, but what the h*** kind of 
stimulus could Carter have provided that wasn't prevalent tons more
during the last 12 years? defecit spending? tax cuts? It is to
groan-inwardly-in-spirit. If monetarists are to be believed just
as only we can prevent forest fires, only printing presses cause
inflation.

As for me, my only economics training consists in paying food bills 
and the mortgage. I don't know what caused the inflation of the 
late 70s and am also anxiously awaiting some kind of answer.
-- 
Jeff Davis <davis@keats.ca.uky.edu> My bad.     
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: greenjb@thatcher.cs.clemson.edu (Jeffrey B. Green)
Subject: Re: Clinton e-mail address (was Re: Internet and the Prez)
Keywords: Let's ask!
Organization: Clemson University Computer Science Dept.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:00:40 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.123359.21913@gagme.chi.il.us> wdp@gagme.chi.il.us (Bill Pfeiffer) writes:
>If anyone is interested, this is the official e-mail for the clinton campaign.
>
>Whether or not it is still applicable, I dont know.  But it would be a good 
>place to send our ideas for a more extensive info network.
>
>75300.3115@compuserve.com
>
>
>William Pfeiffer

I received the note below from the 75300,3115 account a few days ago.

->Jock Gill
->Clinton/Gore Campaign
->Little Rock, AR
->
->[Note: This channel will be closed for a short vacation and relocation.
->The intention is to hold this interruption to as short an interval
->as possible.  Thanks for your patient understanding - J.]]

-- Jeff

J.B.Green (greenjb@cs.clemson.edu)
Newsgroups: ncsu.general,alt.politics.kibo,talk.abortion
From: mdw@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Matt Welsh)
Subject: Re: The FUTURE is HERE!!!!!!!!!
Followup-To: ncsu.general,talk.abortion
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 18:46:04 GMT

In article <72149420218033@c00508-119rd.eos.ncsu.edu> cddukes@c00508-119rd.eos.ncsu.edu (PakRat's Anonymous) writes:

[ 300 lines of rehashed boring abortion flamage slain ]

Mr. Dukes. Please keep this crap out of alt.politics.kibo. We have a serious
job to do here, and your bandwidth is interfering with our plans to take over
the known universe.

Go impress the net elsewhere, and keep that crap in ncsu.general where it
belongs.

Thank you,
mdw
minister of coersion

-- 
Matt Welsh    mdw@tc.cornell.edu        +1 607 253 2737
Systems Programmer, Cornell Theory Center
  "She's like jelly roll, like sculpture!"
Newsgroups: alt.politics.kibo,alt.religion.kibology
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)
Subject: Re: The election's over!!!
Organization: Two rooms filled with typography, in downtown Boston
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 03:56:19 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.033940.13273@tc.cornell.edu> mdw@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Matt Welsh) writes:
>That's it, folks! The election's over!!! Kibo has swept the nation,
>picking up more than 270 of the electoral votes needed to win the 
>presidency!!! Congrats, old boy!! This is great, after all this time, 
>hard work, devotion, crossposting, and most of all, total factual 
>fabrication, how does it feel to be the President of the U.S. of A.???

It feels like... skiing down a mountain... in the nude... biting into a
York Peppermint Patty!  Oh, the wind, the WIND!  I'm FLYING!!!!!

						-- K.
						having a '70s candy
						commercial flashback
						which segues into "It's
						Arbor Day, Charlie Brown"
						with Dolly Madison ads

Newsgroups: ncsu.general,alt.politics.kibo,talk.abortion
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)
Subject: Re: What are your plans, Mr. Kibo?
Organization: Two rooms filled with typography, in downtown Boston
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 07:40:41 GMT

In article <1dnd57INNajk@sal-sun199.usc.edu> echeverr@scf.usc.edu (5150) writes:
>
>Will you run again in `94 (ahem) `96?

Well, since I've been doing so well since I was elected, I certainly
will run for re-election.  In fact, I'm going to run in '93.  I'll
probably win, because none of the other bozos will THINK of it!


							-- K.

Newsgroups: ncsu.general,alt.politics.kibo,talk.abortion
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)
Subject: Re: Faq?
Organization: Two rooms filled with typography, in downtown Boston
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 06:54:24 GMT

[alt.politics.kibo]
In article <Bxn5nr.2FB@world.std.com> jpinnow@world.std.com (John S Pinnow) writes:
>
>Does this group have an FAQ list? 

FAQs are evil and should be banned by constitutional amendment.  State
flowers, too.

>Oh, Gee I think I almost understand world.std.com's motd from last week.

Yes, but the big question is, do you understand "Finnegans Wake" being
read backwards by someone with a speech impediment that makes every line
come out, "Mmnarrr glorp rrrrrrrrrrr sysperlinginmypants" in a storm of
flying guacamole which is so intelligent that it runs a consulting and
escort service from its dumbwaiter?

								-- K.
From: gerberrl@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: CLINTON, PC, AND THE END OF HOMELESSNESS
Date: 6 Nov 1992 14:56:19 GMT
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Reply-To: gerberrl@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra.rose-hulman.edu

It is my belief that with lib.. I mean moderate Bill in the presidency, there will be no more homelessness.  They will now be referred to as "structurally challenged"

Just a prediction.\
Rich Gerberding
gerberrl@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: markwc@barney.esl.com (Mark Christiansen)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: Re: CLINTON, PC, AND THE END OF HOMELESSNESS
Date: 6 Nov 92 22:53:37 GMT
Organization: ESL Inc., Sunnyvale, CA

In article <1de12kINNmch@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
gerberrl@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (Rich Gerberding) writes:
|
|It is my belief that with lib.. I mean moderate Bill in the
|presidency, there will be no more homelessness.  They will now be
|referred to as "structurally challenged"

That's one way to solve the problem - change the name.  Wasn't that
done in France to save a bridge from being destroyed when negotiating
a treaty with a country that lost a battle near that bridge?  I sure
hope we don't loose our perspective of reality by all this PCness (I
do realize that "structurally challenged" is taking PC to an extreme).

:) Mark
-- 
   When I examined myself and my methods of thought I came to the
conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my
talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
   -- Albert Einstein
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: CLINTON, PC, AND THE END OF HOMELESSNESS
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 00:30:32 GMT

In article <1defplINNnvu@cuda.add.itg.ti.com> winsor@geek.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (...or not.) writes:
>In article <1de12kINNmch@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>, gerberrl@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU 
>writes:
>|> It is my belief that with lib.. I mean moderate Bill in the presidency, 
>|>there will be no more homelessness.  They will now be referred to as
>|> "structurally challenged"
>|> 
>|> Just a prediction.\
>|> Rich Gerberding
>|> gerberrl@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
>
>inflamatory, irrelevent, and sardonic
>
>getalifeplease
	Hey, Jimmy II- oops- I mean Clinton, has to come up with some sort of
line to make it look like he's accomplishing what he claims.

William Everett
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
From: feathers@eskimo.celestial.com (Cheryl Owen)
Subject: Re: CLINTON, PC, AND THE END OF HOMELESSNESS
Organization: =>ESKIMO NORTH (206) 367-3837 SEATTLE, WA.<=
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 20:52:37 GMT


   No, that would be residentially challenged.  Structurally challenged
is the proper term to describe the possum you just flattened with your
car on the interstate.  The other acceptable road-kill alternative is
"pavementally challenged."  
   Please don't thank me, I'm only too happy to provide these
clarifications.  :)  Augh!  Here comes the 'exit stage left' hook!
                            Hugs to all,     Feathers/Cheryl
From: sdt8s@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: Re: BRITTLE BILLIONAIRE INSULTS MEDIA
Date: 10 Nov 92 03:03:16 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

grisha@athena.mit.edu  writes:
> Scott Maxwell writes:
> 
> 
> >I can't believe how many respondents failed to get the joke. I'm not sure
> >if it's sad or funny that they're so completely oblivious to the
> >deliberate parallel between this (fake) story and a certain (real) news
> >story. 
> 
> >Maybe all the respondents got the joke and *I'm* missing something. I'd
> >almost prefer that.
> 
> Holy cow! Well, in the light of today's spirit of PC this
> seemed very real. I can't belive *I* didn't quite get it.
> 
> Oh well. BTW, I read today in one magazine (this is NOT a
> joke) that some colleges officially started using the term 
> "first-year students" instead of freshmen. Is it just plain
> stupidity or what?
> 
> -Grigory Golberg, 
>  Politically Incorrect 

Well, here at UVa we've always done that. Of course, we carry
it over--second years, third years, fourth years. The
"reasoning" behind this is that education is an ongoing process
that cannot be completed in four years. (Given the difficulty
of getting the classes you need around here, that's not as
sappy a statement as it might seem.)

Then again, maybe it's because we're a bunch pf elitist preppy
jerks.

Steve
--
Roses are red, 
Violets are blue.
I'm a schizophrenic
And so am I.                   
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
From: tim@ais.org (Tim Tyler)
Subject: W.J.B. Clinton
Organization: UMCC
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 04:29:54 GMT

  Is there any particular reason why the media (& many 'liberals') thought
it
necessary to refer to President Bush as "George Herbert Walker Bush" &
V.P. Quayle as "J. Danforth Quayle," yet never referred to Bill Clinton
using HIS full name -- William Jefferson Blythe Clinton?

   Inquiring Conservative minds want to know...


-- 
 Tim Tyler      Internet: tim@ais.org  MCI Mail: 442-5735 
P.O. Box 443    C$erve: 72571,1005  DDN: Tyler@Dockmaster.ncsc.mil
Ypsilanti MI    Packet: KA8VIR @KA8UNZ.#SEMI.MI.USA.NA
48197
From: slgsn@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: Re: CLINTON, PC, AND THE END OF HOMELESSNESS
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:43:28 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1698@esl.ESL.COM>, markwc@barney.esl.com (Mark Christiansen) writes:
> In article <1de12kINNmch@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
> gerberrl@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (Rich Gerberding) writes:
> |
> |It is my belief that with lib.. I mean moderate Bill in the
> |presidency, there will be no more homelessness.  They will now be
> |referred to as "structurally challenged"
> 
> That's one way to solve the problem - change the name.  Wasn't that
> done in France to save a bridge from being destroyed when negotiating
> a treaty with a country that lost a battle near that bridge?  I sure
> hope we don't loose our perspective of reality by all this PCness (I
> do realize that "structurally challenged" is taking PC to an extreme).
> 
> :) Mark
> -- 
>    When I examined myself and my methods of thought I came to the
> conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my
> talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
>    -- Albert Einstein
"Nobody can offend you without your consent."
   -- Elenor Roosevelt
From: markwc@barney.esl.com (Mark Christiansen)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: Re: CLINTON, PC, AND THE END OF HOMELESSNESS
Date: 10 Nov 92 06:32:51 GMT
Organization: ESL Inc., Sunnyvale, CA

In article <1992Nov9.194328.60591@cc.usu.edu> slgsn@cc.usu.edu writes:
|In article <1698@esl.ESL.COM>, markwc@barney.esl.com (Mark Christiansen) writes:
|> In article <1de12kINNmch@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
|> gerberrl@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (Rich Gerberding) writes:
|> |
|> |It is my belief that with lib.. I mean moderate Bill in the
|> |presidency, there will be no more homelessness.  They will now be
|> |referred to as "structurally challenged"
|> 
|> That's one way to solve the problem - change the name.  Wasn't that
|> done in France to save a bridge from being destroyed when negotiating
|> a treaty with a country that lost a battle near that bridge?  I sure
|> hope we don't loose our perspective of reality by all this PCness (I
|> do realize that "structurally challenged" is taking PC to an extreme).
|> 
|> :) Mark
|> -- 
|>    When I examined myself and my methods of thought I came to the
|> conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my
|> talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
|>    -- Albert Einstein
|"Nobody can offend you without your consent."
|   -- Elenor Roosevelt
   You can't consent to being offended without your consent.
   -- Roosenor Elevent
-- 
   When I examined myself and my methods of thought I came to the
conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my
talent for absorbing positive knowledge.
   -- Albert Einstein
From: winsor@geek.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (...or not.)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: Re: CLINTON, PC, AND THE END OF HOMELESSNESS
Date: 6 Nov 1992 19:07:33 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments Incorporated, Austin
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: geek.teng.ppd.ti.com

In article <1de12kINNmch@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>, gerberrl@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU 
writes:
|> It is my belief that with lib.. I mean moderate Bill in the presidency, 
|>there will be no more homelessness.  They will now be referred to as
|> "structurally challenged"
|> 
|> Just a prediction.\
|> Rich Gerberding
|> gerberrl@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

inflamatory, irrelevent, and sardonic

getalifeplease
From: rnewman@bbn.com (Ron Newman)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: Re: W.J.B. Clinton
Date: 13 Nov 1992 02:13:03 GMT
Organization: Bolt, Beranek & Newman, Inc.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: spcsun25.bbn.com

In article <BxDr5w.FI5@ais.org>, tim@ais.org (Tim Tyler) writes:
|>   Is there any particular reason why the media (& many 'liberals') thought
|> it necessary to refer to President Bush as "George Herbert Walker Bush" &
|> V.P. Quayle as "J. Danforth Quayle," yet never referred to Bill Clinton
|> using HIS full name -- William Jefferson Blythe Clinton?
|> 

Too early.  Give it time.

------- 
Ron Newman		rnewman@bbn.com
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
From: grisha@athena.mit.edu (Grigory Golberg)
Subject: Re: BRITTLE BILLIONAIRE INSULTS MEDIA
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 22:28:02 GMT

Scott Maxwell writes:


>I can't believe how many respondents failed to get the joke. I'm not sure
>if it's sad or funny that they're so completely oblivious to the
>deliberate parallel between this (fake) story and a certain (real) news
>story. 

>Maybe all the respondents got the joke and *I'm* missing something. I'd
>almost prefer that.

Holy cow! Well, in the light of today's spirit of PC this
seemed very real. I can't belive *I* didn't quite get it.

Oh well. BTW, I read today in one magazine (this is NOT a
joke) that some colleges officially started using the term 
"first-year students" instead of freshmen. Is it just plain
stupidity or what?

-Grigory Golberg, 
 Politically Incorrect
From: esr@snark.thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
Subject: "cripple" (Was: Re: A gender neutral pronoun)
Date: 7 Nov 92 00:32:28 GMT
Distribution: world

In <LEE.92Nov5141929@ace.npac.syr.edu> Lee C. Brink wrote:
>You came across sounding like "Using cripple is a bad word, and you should
>stop using it now, and if you can't, you cannot hold any meaningful discussions
>with me." 

I have congenital cerebral palsy. 

I'm not real fond of the word "cripple", myself.  But if anyone ever utters
that loathsome piece of PC mealymouthing, "differently abled", in my presence,
I swear I'm gonna rip their lungs out.
-- 
					Eric S. Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
From: barua@plains.NoDak.edu (Soumen Barua)
Subject: Bill
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 03:43:07 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

Last night I had a dream. I saw Bill Clinton. Then I saw war. I also had an
idea (In the dream) that if I were the President I would have allowed the
Feminist Group to decide everything about women.
Thats all.
From: nmehl@rm105serve.sas.upenn.edu (Nathan J. Mehl)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: Jesus was gay and John was his lover. (NOT!)
Date: 10 Nov 92 07:18:43 GMT
Reply-To: nmehl@rm105serve.sas.upenn.edu
Organization: Nihilists for a Better Tomorrow

In article <9NOV92.15554756@nauvax.ucc.nau.edu> smothers@nauvax.ucc.nau.edu writes:
>
>     Actually, in response to the previous post, I too have heard this
>sentiment, though not written so bluntly from liberal scholars. I have
>also heard the reason that Paul was so hard on women was that the
>"thorn in his flesh" was homosexuality. I am surprised that the source
>of this ludicrous statement this time supposedly comes from a
>catholic priest.

	Well...  A lot of the thinking behind that comes from people
who have been unfortunate enough to personally know extremely closeted
male homosexuals.  Misogyny and professed homophobia of the most rabid
sort really do seem to walk hand-in-glove with that sort of self-warping
lifestyle.  But this is not (to put it mildly) canonical.
	Truth is, I think most people who dabble in these arguments
really don't care one way or the other which biblical figures were
gay.  It's more a tool than anything else - to shock people into
re-evaluating some of their beliefs.  The bottom line is that they're
all dead, and barring a ressurection, we'll never know.

>     As a dabbler in Christian apologetics, I can tell you that all such
>statements fall out of the bounds of reasonableness. Jesus severely pointed
>out sin when he saw it. 

	And it is worth noting that one of the "sins" Jesus never said
word one about was homosexuality.  It was all that lunatic from Tarsus...

>
>    I would like to apologize for all the homosexual bashing by someone
>on this net who feels its his mission in life to offend you guys/girls using
>scripture as justification. Actually most of the christians I know are
>offended more at homosexuals wanted extra rights without actually qualifying
>as a legitimate minority. (I must stop being politically incorrect, this is

	Okay, this is your first time here on a.p.h., so I'll go easy
on you for the moment.

	So... Just *which* "extra rights" have homosexuals been asking for?
I'm very curious, since I haven't seen it yet...

------------Nathan J. Mehl---------------(nmehl@pennsas.upenn.edu)------
It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed.
----[Hit Homophobia where it hurts - it's wallet: Boycott Colorado!]----
From: br758@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dr. Alan Aycock)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: pls ignore; this is a test
Date: 8 Nov 1992 16:05:32 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality