From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: An argument for better sex ed
Date: 9 Jan 93 23:32:32 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Distribution: na
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise

dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-> In article <1993Jan8.221548.28016@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> 
-> sfm@manduca.neurobio.arizona.edu (Stephen Matheson) writes:
-> > Here it is!  I found it!  James Keegan wrote a post called "anti-
-> > choice morality" based (in part) on this atrocity.  He suggested
-> > that the failure of pro-life folks to condemn Suzanne's behavior
-> > was evidence for some sort of moral compromise.  Now I see why.
-> >
-> > Suzanne: your comment is sick.  Your vindictiveness is unhealthy.
-> > I think an apology is in order.
-> 
-> Allow me to clue you in to a little game that the pro-choicers
-> like to play.  The game is called "enrage the opposition".  The 
-> idea is to hurl as many insults and hurtful remarks at Ms. Forgach
-> as possible so that she'll respond in kind.  When Ms. Forgach
-> does respond with small flames, she gets accused of being
-> "hateful", "sick", etc..  

is this what you refer to as a "small flame?"

   "Yeah.   She ain't yours.   She's another man's, a man who's been
    with your wife.   I hope it drives you crazy."
             forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
             <1993Jan7.224312.5846@noao.edu>

-> Often times, the game is played in which a pro-choicer verbally abuses 
-> Ms. Forgach for no apparent reason other than her views on abortion.
-> Ms. Forgach then responds with a small flame, and the pro-choicers 
-> gang up on her and blow her small flame way out of proportion so as 
-> to portray her as being more wicked than the Wicked Witch of the West.
-> In this particular example, we have Patrick Humphrey as the antagonizer, 
-> who has insulted Ms. Forgach on numerous past
-> occassions. 

is this the "small flame" you're talking about?

   "Yeah.   She ain't yours.   She's another man's, a man who's been
    with your wife.   I hope it drives you crazy."
             forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
             <1993Jan7.224312.5846@noao.edu>

-> I feel that Ms. Forgach has received such horrible treatment from
-> pro-choicers that they really don't have any moral standing to accuse
-> her of being "hateful".  They are the ones who are "hateful", IMO. 
-> I'm actually kind of surprised that Ms. Forgach has been as polite
-> as she has been towards these people.

----------
"All fetuses _are_ white.  "White" means lack of pigment.  Black
newborns are born white, and turn black shortly thereafter."
		Suzanne Forgach <1991Jun13.232919.9128@noao.edu>

-----
"I was thinking of names like stupid twit etc. but changed my
mind.  There are no words that can describe my contempt for you
Suzanne.  In your white bread little world passing judgement on
people you neither know nor care about.  Never will you ever if
your God smiles on you have to go through the things some women
will have to contend with to make it from day to the next.
Walk a mile in their shoes, Suzanne.  Life might look very
different to yo on the othr side."

"Who in the hell do you think you are.  You are contemptable, no
worse you are beneath contempt."
	Caryn S. Prater <1991Jun15.031529.12404@swbatl.sbc.com>
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism