From: hporopudas@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi
Subject: Re: How old is the universe?
Organization: Nokia Telecommunications.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 15:21:05 GMT


 In article <1992Sep10.224942.21091@hellgate.utah.edu>,
 tolman%asylum.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Kenneth Tolman) writes:

> How old is the universe is seconds?
>
> How much time is left before it crunches back together?
>
> Where might I find these figures in reference texts?
>

  Could any one of you check reasonableness of the following figures
  by computer calculations:

                           50
  There exist about 5000*10  kg ordinary mass (positive) in the whole universe,
                               50
  and there exist about 6000*10  kg so-called "magic mass" (negative) in the
  whole universe.

  The universe is oscillatory in nature, in other words there exists
  periodically "Big-Bang-Start" and "Mass-Disappearance".

  Masses for all base particles are only due to expansion resistance of the
  positive mass part of the universe and masses for all base particles are
  only due to contraction resistance of the negative part of the universe.
  The reason why absolute values of all base particles are bigger in negative
  mass part of the universe is due the point of view that there exist
                                                                    50
  an enormous concentration of mass in center of the space (about 10   kg)
  which increases contraction resistance in negative mass part of the universe.

  There exist equal number of all positive mass base particles and
  corresponding negative mass base particles (for example positive mass
  protons and negative mass protons, positive mass neutrons and negative mass
  neutrons, positive mass electrons, negative mass electrons, etc...).

  Positive mass part of the universe is expanding uniformly away from
  time's starting point and negative mass part of the universe is contracting
  uniformly towards time's starting point.

  I have understood that time dimension as a whole is like "length dimension",
  it is namely quantized by several hundreds of thousands of radiation
  peripheries, which starts from the time's starting point (in "Big-Bang") and
  ends to "Mass-Disappearance" point. This period is one cycle of our
  oscillatory universe. I have also understood that there exists only
  a finite number of these cycles.

  These radiation peripheries disappear when positive mass part of universe
  stops it's expansion. This is a point when universe's expansion resistance
  goes to zero. Mass for all base particles in positive mass part of universe
  is only due to this expansion resistance.

  Because radiation peripheries were formed from very small massive
  neutrinos related to electron (positive mass and negative mass neutrinos
  formed exotic particles called 'space-potatoes', this exotic particle was
  a fine structure detail in one radiation periphery), this mass is the
  reason why these radiation peripheries disappear when expansion resistance
  goes to zero. (This is also why 'all times' exist for a "while" together.
  This is also in a way a 'moment' when there is no 'time').

  I have not very clear idea what all 'happens' between the this point and
  "Big-Chrunch" (probably this latter does not exist at all). I'am also not
  sure what happens to the negative mass part of universe and will it stop
  contraction wholly (achieve its full collapse). I'am also not sure that
  what effects this invisible heavy mass (formed from diamonds) in center
  of space have to this collapse. It possibly prevents full collapse of
  negative mass part of universe.

  'Diamond', which was formed from one radiation periphery, in time's
  starting point, which have an electric periphery or somekind of flame
  around it which destroys neutrinos, and possibly at least neutrinos
  inside of 'diamond' will be saved from annihilation.

  From these figures and from this description it is perhaps possible to
  calculate the age of the universe and how much time it is to the
  "Mass-Disappearance", if you use the model of universe described
  above, to computer calculations.

  Reference for this text and these figures is my article "Structure of Time",
  which was not accepted to publication by Physical Review newspaper.


              Hannu.

   "Man's body is one type of 'neutrino cage' for man's 'neutrino soul'."

   "There is a bottle of poison, if you look at it closely, you will notice,
    that a bit is taken from it."

   "I would not buy myself at least for a while any stocks of Physical
    Review newspaper from the stock exhange."
Xref: sparky sci.physics:14577 sci.math:11359