HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: drew@ophelia.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt)
Subject: Re: SCSI controllers supported
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:40:19 GMT

In article <ZH1KMRL@taronga.com> peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Is the Always Technologies IN2000 compatible with either 386BSD or Linux?

No. We had been looking at Always support under Linux, but Always refused
to give out technical documentation, so it probably won't happen.

-- 
Microsoft is responsible for propogating the evils it calls DOS and Windows, 
IBM for AIX (appropriately called Aches by those having to administer it), but 
marketing's sins don't come close to those of legal departments.
Boycott AT&T for their absurd anti-BSDI lawsuit.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mirons@ccs.northeastern.edu (Michael A. Irons)
Subject: Re: base,gcc,lib disks parts corrupt?
Organization: Northeastern University, CCS Dept.
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 04:46:29 GMT


	I used these packages, but be forewarned. lilo seems to be compiled
as a shared binary. Also there also are copies of /etc/fstab, /etc/passwd, and
/etc/group. If you don't wan't all your accounts to vanish watch out for these.
Also /dev/mem tries to copy its contents (read core) into the file if you
try to copy it. This makes the machine reboot and trashes the FS! Boy did I 
have a fun day.

						Mike Irons

-- 

                                  Mike Irons;
                       mirons@Dworkin.CCS.Northeastern.EDU	(School)
                 mirons%minix1.uucp@MecEng.COE.Northeastern.EDU	(Home)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: dws@cseg03.uark.edu (David W. Summers)
Subject: Re: Chicken and egg: How was the first linux gcc binary created??
Keywords: gcc linux egg chicken soup
Organization: University of Arkansas
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:03:18 GMT

tep@engr.uark.edu (Tim Peoples) writes:


>   As I was standing in the shower this morning I was thinking (I do
>my best thinking in the shower) "How did Linus generate that first
>gcc binary?"  This was prompted by a newbie question about compilers
>where he said something like "I can't compile a compiler until I have
>a compiler to compile it."
>
>   I guess Linus is the only one who can answer this but I figured it
>would also be of general interest.  So Linus, how'd ya do it???
>
>
>-- 
>
>+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>| Tim Peoples                          | The time has come the hacker said   |
>| tep@engr.uark.edu                    | to talk of many things,             |
>| Dept. of Computer Systems Engineering| of simms and sockets and semaphores |
>| University of Arkansas, Fayetteville | of processes and pings....          |
>+--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>|    I need no disclaimer; nobody listens to what I have to say anyway!!     |
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>

I would guess that he (Linus) either got GCC running on MINIX and compiled
a cross-compiler with GCC or did the same thing on a Sun or some other
computer.

With GCC, it is fairly easy to have it compile itself as a cross-compiler
to target another machine.

    - David Summers

-- 
                         "Never under-estimate the bandwidth of a station-wagon
David Summers             full of tapes, hurtling down the highway."
dws@engr.uark.edu         - Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks"
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp)
Subject: where is lharc?
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 06:10:37 GMT

I assume taht lharc is what's being used to pack up .lha files, so where
is it?  It's not on tsx-11, where it should be.
-- 
Ed Carp, N7EKG                  erc@apple.com                     801/538-0177
"This is the final task I will ever give you, and it  goes  on  forever.   Act
happy, feel happy, be happy, without a reason in the world. Then you can love,
and do what you will."           -- Dan Millman, "Way Of The Peaceful Warrior"
From: ramesh@utdallas.edu (R. Ramesh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Call for updating old binaries at archive sites.
Date: 9 Oct 92 05:07:37 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas


Hello contributers/hackers:

  I was told today by hlu (the GCC man) that a major bug in linux C library
was fixed around the time when gcc 2.2.2d was released. If I can recall the
approx time... it was after Jul 15th and before Aug 15th. But many programs in
the archive sites are older than Jul 15th and therefore need to be updated.
Furthermore jump 4.1 libraries will make this the last effort in updating.

Therefore may ask the original (or latest) contributers of these packages to
the archive sites to recompile them again with the latest gcc and jump 4.1
release of libraries.

Of course, I can do it, but only if I have the disk space and ....

All I can provide at this time is the latest kermit and ghostscript binaries.
Is there interest?

Ramesh
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mjalava@lk-hp-10.hut.fi (Mika Matti Jalava)
Subject: Re: Problem with linux.  GCC report segmentation fault and dump core.
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 08:24:19 GMT

In article <BvpEpB.1xK@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> tqhoang@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Toan Hoang ~{) writes:

>WHen ever I tried to compile a C
>code, it would give me a segmentation fault and dump core, even running the
>gcc alone will do so.

You might suffer from the file corruption problem. The newer kernels
are not very reliable with some hard disks and files may get corrupted
when written to the disk. Try installing again. It may not work even
then, I had to install the biggest parts of the compiler on a floppy
to be able to compile the kernel with HD_DELAY set in hd.c. That
helped a little.

>Another thing I notice is that, the file .login and 
>..cshrc is not being read, because I have everything I set in that file is not
>being initialize.  I also notice that I am using bash instead of tcsh, would
>that make a difference?

Yes, bash uses .profile. Bash actually is the standard shell with linux.

	Mika


Newsgroups: comp.os.minux,comp.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.misc
From: chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg)
Subject: Re: Free OS cross-pollination
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 13:20:54 GMT
Organization: TC Telemanagement, Clearwater, FL
Keywords: gcc linux egg chicken soup
Followup-To: comp.unix.misc

[ followups to comp.unix.misc, for lack of a better place ]

According to torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds):
>The original gcc I used was the minix gcc (1.37.1) by Alan W Black (and
>somebody..
>The minix-386 (thanks again, Bruce - without the 386 patches for minix I
>would never have gotten anywhere) I was running by that time was able to
>execute normal gcc binaries directly (the only major diff I did to minix
>- and awb later made a better version of it), which is also the standard
>linux binary format.

So without Minix, Linux might not have been; or if it had, its
creation would have been much more difficult.

Now Linux and 386BSD can become starting points for new projects, too.

Source code is a wonderful thing, n'est ce pas?
-- 
Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT  <chip@tct.com>, <73717.366@compuserve.com>
   "I am truly as big a genius as all other Rush fans." -- Bruce Bufalini
From: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Video cards for linux
Date: 14 Oct 1992 20:03:55 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, dlwilson@fenix.encore.com (David L Wilson) says:

>Are there any PC hardware hackers who can comment on what it would take to
>put *two* VGA displays on a PC?  I believe all (or nearly all) the software
>is there to support dual screen X, if only there were a second display to
>write to.
>



actually, I think the standard PC architecture greatly
restricts such things. You can of course invest in a new 
motherboard (perhaps with 4 486s) and have duel heads. I would suggest
either lowering yourself to a MAC or invest in some sort of RISC machine.
Those Silicon Graphics machines are looking real nice......


BTW, DOS does support dual head monitors, one VGA and one CGA.
Great for CSHOW though......
of course, I wouldn't need a program like that :)

*evil grin*

-- 
maThiEu a. LeWis    
cyber-mercenary         This sentnce has threee errors. 
Thieves Like Us      
mal11@Po.cwru.edu
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Beginner Enquiry on Linux
Keywords: jk
Date: 7 Oct 92 17:18:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Oct7.171832.12199
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University

In article <eb139.718461656@fred>, eb139@cs.city.ac.uk (MAHMOOD Z) writes:
|> Hello Linux enthusiasts everywhere,
|> I have been on the market for buying a PC for a long time and it looks like I
|> am now going to buy one with a spec to suit Linux as I wish to install both
|> Linux and X11 when I eventually buy the PC in a few weeks. I have settled on
|> the spec below :
|> 	486SX 25 MHz processor

Don't by 486SX.

|> 	SVGA Monitor
|> 	ET4000 based video card with 1 Meg RAM
|> 	4 meg RAM on the motherboard

Make sure your RAM is no slower than 60ns. If you can afford, get 8 MB RAM.

|> 	100MEg Hard disk
|> 
|> as I will be running both Linux and X11 with a text editor such as Emacs, and
|> Gcc as my minimum Linux set up, I was wondering if any knowledgable readers out
|> there could tell me how much diskspace this is likely to take and is 100Meg

With gcc, emacs and X11, if you want the full power of them, I would go for
at least 80 MB.

|> Hard disk a sensible option when I will also be running Windows and Dos 5.0
|> (bleurgh!!!) with Word 2.0 for WIndows installed on the hard disk....

Get at least 200MB for DOS and Linux.

|> Thanks
|> 
|> ZM

I have seen 486-33, 8MB and 230MB hd for $1,900.

H.J.
From: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: mount* paradox
Date: 12 Oct 1992 11:16:03 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, richard@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Richard Harry) says:

>From article <1b9fiqINNfkq@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, by mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis):
>> 
>> H.J's new rootdisk supposedly has a new mount on it but i didn't
>> want to have to get his rootdisk. So I thought I would manually
>> copy stuff over after mounting the floppy. Unfortunately, 
>
>???? I don't understand, you don't want to get his rootdisk yet you want
>to mount it. How do you mount a disk you haven't got  ? :)
>
>Assuming you have actually got it, why not boot using this *bootable*
>rootdisk, mount your hard disk on /mnt and cp the mount binary from the
>floppy to your newly mounted hard disk.


I wanted something that was unfortunately on the wrong media of my boot
floppy drive a:. I think I read that the HJ rootdisk 1.44 MB has some
more stuff than the 1.2 MB version.

I guess I could have open up my computer and switched the cables to my
floppy drives........  :)


-- 
maThiEu a. LeWis    
cyber-mercenary         This sentnce has threee errors. 
Thieves Like Us      
mal11@Po.cwru.edu    
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: plph@engin.umich.edu (Mark Montague)
Subject: Need help recompiling jump table libraries
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 15:25:37 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor


<Sigh>.  I was hoping I could figure it out myself, but...

Could some kind soul please give me a hint on how to build the shared
libraries with jump tables?

  * I compiled the static libararies with "make static" in libc-linux.  These
    go in /usr/lib, correct?

  * I did a "make jump" in libc-linux.  Where do I put libc-linux/*.a so the
    stuff in shlib/jump can find them?

  * In general, what do I have to do from here?  Am I correct in assuming that
    shlib/jump is the place to start, or do I have to do something in
    shlib/classic first?

  * Where did the *.a files in shlib/stub come from?  Can I generate them
    myself?

Thank you very much for any help!

Mark Montague
plph@caen.engin.umich.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: peterc@suite.sw.oz.au (Peter Chubb)
Subject: Out of memory problems with 0.98 + 0.8.1 TCP/IP
Organization: Softway Pty Ltd
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 02:04:48 GMT


I'm seeing frequent crashes (i.e., kernel panics) because of low
memory, especially when transferring files to or from my Linux
machine.

Typically, there are a number of messages like:
nr_free_pages is -1, but no free memory found

then one like:
task[0] (swapper) killed: unable to recover
Panic: Trying to free up swapper memory space

Anyone know how to fix this?


			Regards,

				- Peter Chubb

Softway Pty Ltd, P.O. Box 305, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012, AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 2 698 2322;       Fax: +61 2 699 9174;     Telex: AA27987
Internet: peterc@softway.oz.au	   UUCP: ...!uunet!softway.oz!peterc
From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Writing Linux disks on Sun
Keywords: sun
Date: 9 Oct 92 14:57:48 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <ucosmo.718399359@mcl>, ucosmo@mcl.ucsb.edu (Boris Burtin) writes:
| I was just curious if someone had a solution to this problem.  It seems that
| you can only write DOS disks on a Sun Sparc if you are root and can mount a
| DOS floppy.  Does someone have an alternate solution?  Linux can't read a
| disk tarred on a Sun, can it?

a) yes it can, or at least cpio with -c
b) use mtools, no privs needed to r/w DOS format disks
-- 
bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
    Keyboard controller has been disabled, press F1 to continue.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Subject: Re: XFM 1.1: not work at all
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 21:00:21 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.190416.22416@athena.mit.edu>, Ching-Hsiang Chen <chchen@stat.fsu.edu> writes:
|> I've tried XFM 1.1, from old X version 1.1 to current Xfree86, including
|> both binary and source version. I could compile it w/o any problem
|> at all but each time I ran it, it gave me a core dump. This happened
|> when I still got a 386SX/16 to current 386DX/33. I got 5 mb RAM.
|> Kind of frustrating. Anyone succeeds?
|> 
|> Steve Chen             chchen@stat.fsu.edu

First thing to do is link with static lib. If it works, get GCC FAQ and read
it.

You should look for `errno' and `environ'.


------
QUESTION: How do I compile programs under Linux?

ANSWER: The Linux C library is trying to be ANSI/POSIX compliant. It
is also very compatible with SYSV and BSD. The C library is loaded
with SYSV and BSD functions. There are three exceptions:

1. signal in Linux is POSIX.
2. tty in Linux is POSIX.
3. time functions are POSIX, plus a few BSD and SYSV extensions.
4. setjmp/longjmp functions are POSIX. But you can use -D__FAVOR_BSD
   to make it BSD or use sigsigjmp/siglongjmp.

When you compile a program under Linux, your best bet is include all
the appropriate header files and use -Wall. All the usable functions
and global variables are declared in the corresponding header files.
YOU SHOULD NOT DEFINE ANY functions or global variables OF THE LINUX C
LIBRARY IN YOUR CODE IF YOU WANT TO USE THE SHARED LIBRARIES.

After saying all those, you now should know you can compile a program
with -D_POSIX_SOURCE or -D_GNU_SOURCE (read <features.h> for details).
With a few modifications you can even use -DSYSV, -DUSG or -DBSD. Some
codes need to define -DSTDC_HEADERS for ANSI C compiler like gcc here.

To use malloc () and calloc () safely under Linux, please include

<stdlib.h> and don't define NO_FIX_MALLOC.

BTW, gcc -traditional should work with gcc 2.2.2d or above.

Please also read ChangeLog for the latest enhencement.

Please read the header files for details. Maybe you should get a book
on POSIX. Any suggestion of the book list?

From Steve Robbins  --  steve@nyongwa.cam.org

--------
I like "POSIX Programmer's Guide", by Donald Lewine.  Its essentially
a list of POSIX functions' man pages, with a very brief guide in the
beginning of a few things.  It's published by O'Reilly & Associates,
Inc.
--------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: sharman@Software.Mitel.COM (Richard Sharman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: unable to get man-src from tsx-11
Date: 14 Oct 92 01:44:31 GMT
Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.

Hi.  I've been trying for some time to get man-1.1a.src.tar.Z from
tsx-11.  We don't have ftp access but we access to some mail server
routine which can get ftp files.  I recently re-loaded the ls-lR
file, which shows in directory

mirrors/mcc-interim/0.97p2/source_links:

the file

lrwxrwxrwx  1 tytso          34 Aug 30 03:01 man-1.1a.src.tar.Z -> /pub/linux/misc/man-1.1a.src.tar.Z

I've tried both
pub/linux/mirrors/mcc-interim/0.97p2/source_links/man-1.1a.src.tar.Z
and
pub/linux/misc/man-1.1a.src.tar.Z
but both fail.  I've been able to get other files from tsx-11 without
problems.  Is there something odd about these files?  Am I doing
something stupid?  I can't see what!  Does anyone have any ideas?

Thanks.
Richard

PS - in case it sheds any light on the matter, these are the error
messages I receive back from the mail server:

ftpget: server returned permanant negative reply 550 pub/linux/mirrors/mcc-interim/0.97p2/source_links/man-1.1a.src.tar.Z: No such file or directory.
ftpget: error getting file pub/linux/mirrors/mcc-interim/0.97p2/source_links/man-1.1a.src.tar.Z

ftpget: server returned permanant negative reply 550 pub/linux/misc/man-1.1a.src.tar.Z: No such file or directory.
ftpget: error getting file pub/linux/misc/man-1.1a.src.tar.Z

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: eichin@athena.mit.edu (Mark W. Eichin)
Subject: Re: TCPIP and config.c
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:38:26 GMT

>> socket: Protocol not supported
	I was getting those too... didn't have config sources handy
(I'd installed from SLS) so fired up gdb, set a breakpoint in perror,
and sure enough, it was getting called from main with errno==93.
disassembled main, saw the call to "socket" with 2,1,2 (which is
pretty common, though of course everyone should be using the
symbols...) Going in with emacs, and finding j^Bj^Aj^B and changing it
to j^Fj^Aj^B made config work (well enough to telnet to the loopback
port, anyway...)
	Looking at all uses of IP_TCP in the kernel, sock.c, line 709,
checks for protocol != IP_TCP when creating a SOCK_STREAM (in
ip_proto_create.) This looks like where the error is -- IP_TCP is a
value of a field in a packet (see how it's used in tcp.c) not a
protocol family; it should be matching on PF_INET, which is in
linux/socket.h (included properly via sys/socket.h.) [The use of
IP_UDP a few lines later should probably be taken out entirely.]
	I'll send this to the "net" channel and see if anyone
disagrees, but since the arguments to the socket syscall are handled
in socket.c and aren't translated before calling sock->ops->create,
that the comparison is wrong... I haven't traced what happens to the
value after it gets stored in struct sock though.
				_Mark_ <eichin@athena.mit.edu>
				MIT Student Information Processing Board
				Cygnus Support <eichin@cygnus.com>
From: dabdub@aeolus.caltech.edu (Donald Dabdub)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: TeX works --- xdvi doesn't work
Date: 13 Oct 1992 10:58:11 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: aeolus.che.caltech.edu
Originator: dabdub@aeolus.che.caltech.edu

Hello world,


I got the following tex files from tsx-11.mit.edu

-rw-------   1 dabdub   users      597545 Oct 11 19:13 LaTeX.T.Z
-rw-------   1 dabdub   users      892931 Oct 11 18:40 TeXbin.T.Z
-rw-------   1 dabdub   users     1256881 Oct 11 18:55 TeXlib.T.Z
-rw-------   1 dabdub   users       56917 Oct 11 19:04 TeXman.T.Z
-rw-------   1 dabdub   users      483123 Oct 11 19:03 TeXmisc.T.Z

I proceed to uncompress them and untar them in the root directory.  It seems
that all is installed ok under /usr/TeX/etc......

In fact:

# latex c.tex
This is TeX, C Version 3.141
(c.tex
LaTeX Version 2.09 <25 March 1992>
(/usr/TeX/lib/tex/macros/LaTeX/article.sty
Standard Document Style `article' <14 Jan 92>.
(/usr/TeX/lib/tex/macros/LaTeX/art10.sty)) (c.aux) [1] (c.toc [2]) [3] [4]
[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] (c.aux) )
Output written on c.dvi (14 pages, 28464 bytes).
Transcript written on c.log.

IT WORKS....

The problem is the following:

# xdvi c.dvi
- /usr/TeX/lib/tex/MakeTeXPK cmbx10 518 300 magstep\(3\)
/usr/TeX/lib/tex/fonts/cmbx10.518pk already exists!
Can't find font cmbx10.
- /usr/TeX/lib/tex/MakeTeXPK cmbx10 432 300 magstep\(2\)
/usr/TeX/lib/tex/fonts/cmbx10.432pk already exists!
Can't find font cmbx10.
- /usr/TeX/lib/tex/MakeTeXPK cmr10 432 300 magstep\(2\)
/usr/TeX/lib/tex/fonts/cmr10.432pk already exists!
....
[Similar stuff deleted]
....
/usr/TeX/lib/tex/fonts/cmr10.300pk already exists!
Can't find font cmr10.
xdvi: Not all pixel files were found
# 

In other words, xdvi is not working properly.  Any suggestions?

BTW this are my lib's in case you are wondering:

# pwd
/lib
# ls 
XawVen.so.2.0   cpp             libXaw.a        libc.so.4.1     libm.so.4
XawVen.so.2.1   libX11.so.2.0   libc.so.4       libemu          libm.so.4.0
XtVen.so.2.0    libX11.so.2.1   libc.so.4.0     libhard.so.4.0
# 

Please respond to dabdub@aeolus.caltech.edu and I will post a summary of
responses.

All the best, 

Donald


-- 
Donald Dabdub
210-41 Chemical Engr
CALTECH
Pasadena, CA 91125
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: vivek@iitb.ernet.in (Vivek Wandile)
Subject: Linux and TCP/IP
Organization: Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 12:24:51 IST

I am forwarding the query of one of my friend who does have the facility
to post the news.
------------------ message starts here ----------------------------------
Hello netters,
I've a 486 machine with 16MB RAM, 200MB hard disk and SVGA monitor. I
would like to load the latest version of linux on it, as I am fairly
impressed with the discussion that is going on about it in this group.
I would like to have that version to support the TCP/IP protocol, as 
well.
Any pointers, any leads as to where can I get more info on it are most
welcome. Also, if anyone out there has already installed it, I would
like to know his/her experience.

Please send your replies to me by email at 
anoop%tele@iitb.ernet.in

Many many thanks in advance.
Anoop.

--
   xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   ! E-Mail : anoop@cc.iitb.ernet.in | Anoop Kulkarni, Research    !
   !        anoop%tele@iitb.ernet.in | Scholar, dept. of EE, IIT,  !
   ! Phone  : (9122) 578 2545 x 2499 | Powai, Bombay 400076, INDIA !
   !---------------------------------------------------------------!
   !    Beware of a programmer with a screwdriver in his hands!    !
   xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
vivek wandile
Research Engineer
ERNET Lab, IIT Bombay.
From: wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: where is lharc?
Date: 13 Oct 92 14:09:12 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp) writes:
>I assume taht lharc is what's being used to pack up .lha files, so where
>is it?  It's not on tsx-11, where it should be.

Look for LHa instead.  I think there is a copy on tsx-11 at least in the
lisp directory (packages/lisp or something).

--
Lars.Wirzenius@helsinki.fi  (finger wirzeniu@klaava.helsinki.fi)