HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Keegan Stoops to Attempted Fraud
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 06:47:37 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.215030.3811@crd.ge.com> keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com 
(James G Keegan Jr) purported to reproduce an article of mine, 
<1992Apr4.181043.18607@rotag.mi.org> verbatim. However, further inspection
reveals that the following paragraph (and the following paragraph) was missing 
from that "verbatim" reproduction:

---

Please identify the *MOST* provable of all my alleged "lies". I know you have
reasonable archives, so this should be simple for you. And certainly if even 
the _most_ provable alleged "lie" is a sham, all of the less provable ones 
must be even bigger shams, right?

---

Although these paragraphs were missing, absolutely *NO* indication was given 
of any deletions or elisions. Mr. Keegan's article was posted fairly recently, 
so readers should be able to verify for themselves the total absence of any 
visual indicators of deletion or elision. 

Furthermore, the paragraph quoted above was in fact the whole _raison d'etre_ 
of the post, and its elision, even if it had been announced, removes vital 
context and completely distorts the meaning of the remainder of the article. 
This is a clear-cut case of attempted fraud by Mr. Keegan, the apparent intent 
of which was to provide himself with a cowardly "escape route" from the 
honorable challenge I had laid before him.

I request the following from Mr. Keegan:

	A) An apology for the blatant misquote.

	B) A retraction of the original charge that I "lie quite frequently"
	   which was made in <1992Apr3.221351.13204@crd.ge.com>, or,
	   alternatively, the identification of my "most provable [alleged]
	   lie", as I challenged in the deleted paragraph shown above.

The depths to which Mr. Keegan seems willing to plummet in his Dirty Little 
War of Words against me continues to provide a constant source of amazement...

								- Kevin
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7061 alt.fan.q:425
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.q
Subject: Re: Kevin's "Business" Practices
Date: 16 Apr 92 09:04:53 GMT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

krobinsn@mirkwood.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:

> Can we say BECOMING ONE WITH THE IDIOT CROWD, boys and girls?
> 
> K e n   R o b i n s o n

Can we say SHUT-THE-FUCK-UP-KEN, boys and girls?

Fuck off.

===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri)
Subject: Re: HOMOSEXUALITY IS ECONOMICALLY ADVANTAGEOUS (clarification)
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 18:04:39 GMT

Just a clarification:
the posting was not trying to imply that people are homosexual for economic
reasons or any other reason than that's what they feel inside (as we ALL
know) is right for them. It was simply an attempt to show the phobes that
this thing (homosexuality) they hate is beneficial to them. Also, it was
not trying to say that heterosexuals all (married or un) sponged off the
govt.

BRI

Xref: sparky alt.flame:6790 talk.abortion:15178
From: keegan@scoobiedoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig when he is exposed in another lie (was Re: Keegan Stoops to Attempted Fraud)
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:21:21 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
-> >kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> >-> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
-> >-> >you are a fucking liar.
-> >
-> >-> What a comforting thought
-> >
-> >you find it comforting that you have been shown to be a liar,
-> >again?

-> Isn't that what I just said?

yes it is. concratulations.

shall we move on to your next lie now?

        "Kevin, your own credibility may continue to decrease
        with longevity, but that's not the case for everyone."
		Jeff d'Arcy <jdarcy@encore.com> 
		<15249@encore.Encore.COM>


--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig Was: Way too long
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 01:40:21 GMT

In article <H.WnqIfYu2_lk@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
>In <1992Apr11.170030.8666@rotag.mi.org>
>>
>>Your attribution line says "kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:", does
>>it not? I did not write the article as you presented it, nor is there any
>>clue, hint or indication that the article had been altered or doctored in
>>any way. 
>
>    Kevin, you should stay out of discussions in news.admin until you
>at least have enough of a clue to know that rn and several other common 
>newsreaders in use automatically append the attribution line to the 
>follow up articles they generate. 

Just because it's (semi-)automated doesn't mean Keegan is absolved of blame.
The ultimate responsibility for what appears in Keegan's articles is Keegan 
himself. Concur?

Also, don't make assumptions about what people know or do not know. I could 
probably teach _you_ a thing or two about rn and its progeny...

								- Kevin
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6744 alt.politics.homosexuality:2101
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 17:55:00 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> I've been heterosexual.  Face it, punk, it's boring.

You're girlfriend must have been a real dud.



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Homosex Victims are ILL. We should pity them.
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:58:07 GMT
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)

In article <1992Apr2.025528.7429@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <9203312214.47@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>
>>The path headers on his postings are fairly interesting.  There doesn't
>>seem to be a tcrs or TCRS in the mail maps.  His latest posting seems to
>>have gone through think.com twice, implying that it is a forgery from
>>somewhere.
>
>Well, not necessarily, Rick. Oftentimes, sites rewrite headers to make 
>"hidden" hosts look like a gateway machine. Depending on how the news/mail 
>flows through this kind of configuaration, it is quite common to see the 
>same name twice in the Path: headers. A lot of stuff that goes through uunet,
>for instance, has "...uunet!uunet!..." in the Path:.

In some cases that is true.  From what I understand, at uunet news is 
received on one machine and batched on another, thus the "uunet!uunet"
in the path.  In this case, I think that tcrs is a non-existant system.
I could be wrong.  My main news feed is ...think!unixland..., what I saw
was a header that was ..think..!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu..!think!unixland..
I will have to look at future artimus postings.  Since the gaping hole
at mintaka is now closed, the paths should be different if it was a forgery.

-- 

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: dlu@wobble.uucp (Doug Urner)
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Organization: dlu UNIX Consultants
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 23:21:58 GMT

punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:

>twpierce@amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

>> If they have made a CHOICE not to procreate, that doesn't mean
>> they CAN'T.

>You keep twisting me words around.  What I said, and I will say it again,
>two male lovers cannot procreate and pass on BOTH of their DNA to the child.

>Therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for them to have a natural child.

>The same for lesbians.

So what?  Does it make the child less loved or less wanted?  Does it
make the child feel less like she/he is part of the family?  What
earthly difference does it make?  Surely any [Gg]od worthy of the name
isn't going to care.

To talk about the "naturalness" of people is just silly.  Unless your
intention is to encourage attacks against lesbians, gay men and their
children.  Then it is just vicious.  All you can do with these
arguments is to hurt and threaten people.  There is nothing
"un-natural" about the children of lesbians or gay men.  Why does they
make you so upset?
-- 
Doug Urner, dlu@wobble   "They tear down our comrades like leaves from a tree,
dlu UNIX Consulting       leaves from a tree, leaves from a tree, but the
Bellingham, WA            tree still stands, its roots locked to the land."
206/676-5759                              -- Song of the Exile,  Barry Guilder
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Turkey Basters! [was Re: Straight Child molesters?]
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 15:23:56 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

sue@netcom.com (Sue Miller) writes:

> The "turkey baster" thing is what's funny.  You don't really think 
> people are using turkey basters for home inseminations, do you?  
> This, to put it delicately, is an unrealistic male goal.  :-)
> 
> 

That statement was referring to what I consider a very demeaning
term applied to males who use their natural equipment to do the
trick on gay women - I heard the term from one. (it s not mine!!)

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.q
From: krobinsn@mirkwood.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Kevin's "Business" Practices
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 03:24:24 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.041953.23675@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>In article <22980@goofy.Apple.COM> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>>In article <0u6Hp*&e6@cs.psu.edu>, krobinsn@carn-dum.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J
>>Robinson) writes:
>>> 
>>> Can we say MISINFORMED, boys and girls?
>>
>>The evidence would strongly suggest that that's all you _can_ say.
>
>Not quite -- he *can* say OGGLE a lot.  (But after those two
>accomplishments, he's pretty limited as to anything else.)

Can we say BECOMING ONE WITH THE IDIOT CROWD, boys and girls?

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell! (everybody answers)
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:22:50 GMT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1992Apr9.183619.745@gacvx2.gac.edu>, karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes:
> In article <1ad87389.ARN187d@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au>  whines:
>  
>> I would really like to thank the bastard who faked an Email from
>> me to my postmaster, and said "I'm going on holidays for three
>> weeks, can you turn off my newsfeed". Sheesh. 
[...]
> "PSU sucks!" -- Mark Kinney
[...]  
> I just beat all these posters to putting in their two cents.
> Ohh, what a feeling!!
> 
Actually, no. I was going to say "PSU *really* sucks!"
-- 
Mark Kinney [KINNEMA@WKUVX1.(BITNET)(WKU.EDU)] | Don't just eat a hamburger,
This has been a test. If this had been an actual emergency, you'd be dead.
Quote of the Week: "Quaker-pop Rice Sparkies and Quaker-pop Wheat Sparkies,
	those delicious, nutritious breakfast cereals shot from guns!"
				-- Negativland, "Guns"
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7157 alt.politics.homosexuality:2410
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 17 Apr 92 09:39:35 GMT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:

> In article <kH4aJB4w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> 
> >Something must be wrong if you have to go to guys...
> >
> >If you loved her, you wouldn't be playing house with anyone else.
> 
> Sexual attraction and love are unrelated things.  Of course, I could 
> not expect someone as hateful as you to understand that.

Oh, bwah.  I will differ with that remark.  Look, I doubt that you would know
true-love if it bit you on your ass.  I loved my wife.  I didn't have to go
screwing the milkman on a whim...  Good grief you really don't get it do you?

I didn't need to get any other forfillment.  She was all I needed.  You're
sex out of the relationship is technically adultry.  Think about it.

I guess you don't believe in being faithful do you?

Let me tell you something about the sex act sonny.  Whenever you perform it
when you're not in love, it just isn't as full of an experience as it is with
the love.  Trust me on this one.  Back in high school, it was try to stick my
dick into as many females as possible.  It was somewhat of a lame pursuit until
I found that one special one that I fell in love with.

That really made the sex great.  You might try that one sometime if you're
being openminded.


> So, what do you think about your login "punk".... *snicker*snicker*

Shall I take that as a threat?  What are you going to do, pull my account?

> FWA

It just hit me what "FWA" stands for....

(F)aggot (W)ith (A)ttitude...

Ohwell, If I'm wrong about what you mean it to stand for, please correct, but
I would say that my rendition is also acurate.


===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:58:13 GMT
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Keywords: "K e n thinks" == oxymoron.

In article <2#2H5k&p6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@alqualonde.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <9204131101.14@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>In article <vn6Hug#o6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@cirith-ungol.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>In article <9204120838.24@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>>>In article <x3$vHhd8m6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
>>>>>In article <9204081556.29@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>>>>|> In article <1=+vH+5qk6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@beyond.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
>>>>>|> >In article <9204071438.26@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>>>>|> 
>>>>>|> >|> >Yeah, and I'll send you a map to come to Penn State, the center of all
>>>>>|> >|> >information.
>>>>>|> >|> 
>>>>>|> >|> It seems more like the center of bewilderment, to me.
>>>>>|> >
>>>>>|> >And it seems that your brain and your life are the center of misinformation.
>>>>>|> 
>>>>>|> Wrong again.  I haven't given my hard-earned money to PSU.
>>>>>
>>>>>And since you haven't, you will never be informed of anything.
>>>>
>>>>I think you've got that backwards.
>>>
>>>No, Rick, you have it backwards. You are still unable to initiate
>>>the simplest thought processes required for any simple task brought
>>>before you. You continue to thrive on misinformation. It's quite
>>>apparent that the Rick Kelly carbon-based unit is in need of serious
>>>repairs.
>>
>>And you speak for Bruce now?
>
>No, I am pointing out that you have it backwards and not Bruce.
>Bruce is quite capable of pseaking for himself.

So why don't you let him?

He seems to know more words than you do.

>>Are you going to help him make road maps?
>
>No, K e n does not need to make road maps. Road maps can be obtained
>in the local library.

The average person gets their road maps from a gas station.

But I guess you're incapable of driving a car with your head up your
ass.

>>What is this fear that you have about the word "human"?
>
>I have no fear for the word human, human.
>
>Now terminate yourself at once and spare us the misinformation.

I think you need to go and pray to your porcelain goddess.

Why don't you invite Bruce, maybe he'll bring his dildo.

-- 

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig Was: Way too long
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 04:53:21 GMT

In article <H.LG0Rz6&DanA@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
>In <1992Apr14.014021.4140@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>>In article <H.WnqIfYu2_lk@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
>>>In <1992Apr11.170030.8666@rotag.mi.org>
>>>>
>>>>Your attribution line says "kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:", does
>>>>it not? I did not write the article as you presented it, nor is there any
>>>>clue, hint or indication that the article had been altered or doctored in
>>>>any way. 
>>>
>>>    Kevin, you should stay out of discussions in news.admin until you
>>>at least have enough of a clue to know that rn and several other common 
>>>newsreaders in use automatically append the attribution line to the 
>>>follow up articles they generate. 
>>
>>Just because it's (semi-)automated doesn't mean Keegan is absolved of blame.
>>The ultimate responsibility for what appears in Keegan's articles is Keegan 
>>himself. Concur?
>
>    No, I don't concur. Can you point me to the relevant article on 
>posting where it says that anyone who allows their newsreader to 
>generate this line and doesn't edit it is required to either include 
>the entire article verbatim, or note that the posting has been edited?

It's irrelevant whether the newsreader generated it or not. Software is 
supposed to be the TOOL of man, not its MASTER, John Boy.

As far as faithful quoting, try reading a book on English writing style, or
legal citations sometime. Elisions should ALWAYS be indicated in some form
or another. To do less is to do potential violence to the author's original
meaning or intent.

>>Also, don't make assumptions about what people know or do not know. I could 
>>probably teach _you_ a thing or two about rn and its progeny...
>
>    So you knew that the attribution line was automatically generated, yet
>you accused Keegan of implying that his article was verbatum because he 
>had an automaticaly generated line in it. 

Once again, with feeling... it doesn't make a *DAMN* bit of difference 
whether the attribution line was automatically generated or not, John Boy. 
Keegan presumably has the power to a) manually edit his attribution, to 
b) modify the program or script which generated the attribution line, to 
c) use another newsreading package, to d) use another posting host with better
software, or, e) if desperate, to not post at all, or f) some combination of 
the above. THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT APPEARS IN KEEGAN'S ARTICLES 
IS KEEGAN HIMSELF. Period. End of sentence.

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinsn@alqualonde.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
Keywords: Rick plays with blocks
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 03:42:18 GMT

In article <9204131109.23@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>In article <cz6H&r#o6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@cirith-ungol.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <9204120857.40@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>>In article <skHtf9o6@cs.psu.edu> Jacob A. Vanier <vanier@cs.psu.edu> writes:
>>>>X-Political-Statement: Barry G. Morgan for President in 2032!
>>>>Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
>>>>Nntp-Posting-Host: prolog.cs.psu.edu
>>>>X-Whoosh: WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH
>>>>Organization: Whooshers of America (WoA!)
>>>>References: <9204111238.48@rmkhome.UUCP>
>>>>X-Oggle:  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  
>>>>X-Subliminal-Message: Rick is an Idiot!
>>>>Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 05:07:04 GMT
>>>>Lines: 20
>>>>
>>>>In article <9204111238.48@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>And you are a misanthrope.
>>>>>
>>>>>-- 
>>>>>
>>>>>Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
>>>>
>>>>Again I read more misrepresentations, dissimulations, ungrounded, and unfounded
>>>>statements.  K e n does not despise, detest, nor loathe mankind.  Nay, K e n 
>>>>finds great humor and amusement from the lowly plebians who think themselves
>>>>worthy of corresponding with him.  Their hypocrisy, and their lack of knowledge
>>>>in such simple tasks as flaming and educating their peers will never cease to 
>>>>amuse K e n in his daily routine.
>>>>
>>>>Rick eloquently demonstrates that he is misinformed.  No more needs to be said!
>>>
>>>And you're ken's halfwit brother?
>>
>>No, you are quite misinformed again, Rick. Jake is an informed individual,
>>something you wish you could be, but due to a massive need of repairs
>>it seems as if you could never attain such a high level of being.
>
>You didn't answer the question.

Yes I did. I said you were misinformed. Is it that hard to extrapolate
that I am not Jake's brother?? The first sentence said it all. Think
before posting, Rick.

>Do you speak for Jake?

No, I speak for alt.flame. What do you speak for?

>>>Why don't you go help him with his toilet worship?
>>
>>Toilets are not used for worshipping. Toilets are used for desposing
>>excrement and other body wastes. It is quite apparent that you are
>>indeed, misinformed.
>
>So why the fascination?

Why don't you ask yourself. Maybe you might get an answer, although the
odds are against it.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6294 talk.bizarre:10400 alt.politics.homosexuality:1809
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (From A to B)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.bizarre,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:38:49 GMT
Followup-To: alt.sex.motss
Distribution: world,public
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass) writes:
> I am openly gay.  It doesn't mean I go around forcing it down people's
> throats.

Or at least, not without a condom.


mathew

-- 
Hail Eris! / "Our whole economy's based on fear and death; how long can we get
away with this?" --- Jello Biafra / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! /
PGP RSA public key available on request / Desperately seeking Negativland's U2
CD / Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig Was: Way too long
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 16:24:00 GMT

In article <23297@goofy.Apple.COM> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>In article <H.WnqIfYu2_lk@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>, jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John
>Henders) writes:
>> 
>> In <1992Apr11.170030.8666@rotag.mi.org>
>> >
>> >Your attribution line says "kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:", does
>> >it not? I did not write the article as you presented it, nor is there any
>> >clue, hint or indication that the article had been altered or doctored in
>> >any way. 
>> 
>>     Kevin, you should stay out of discussions in news.admin until you
>> at least have enough of a clue to know that rn and several other common 
>> newsreaders in use automatically append the attribution line to the 
>> follow up articles they generate. 
>
>Oh, it's better than that.  Kevin (aka Mr. Junior System Administrator Man)
>took Mr. Keegan to task several months ago for the format of his attribution
>lines.  Seems they read "kevin@rotag writes..."; Kevin initially claimed
                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>that they were in violation of RFC.  
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is an outright falsehood. I never claimed they were in violation of
any RFC. Please support this statement, or retract it.

								- Kevin