HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: as413@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Eric William Paslick)
Subject: Re: Season Premier
Reply-To: as413@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Eric William Paslick)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 00:25:57 GMT


In a previous article, lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) says:

>In article <XJHsPB1w165w@tradent.wimsey.bc.ca>, awesome@tradent.wimsey.bc.ca (Travis Leippi) writes:
>> 
>> Edwardl@freddyk.uucp (Ed Langenback) writes:
>> 
>> > does anyone know when the season premier of ST:TNG will air?
>> >  
>> > -- 
>> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> > |EdwardL@FreddyK.UUCP             |     Nightmares            |
>> > |...uark!freddyk!edwardl          |       Are                 |
>> > |Sysop:Springwood BBS 501-582-2519|     Forever!              |
>> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> 
>> As far as I know September 26, 1992 will be the uplink date.
>> 
>
>No, I think it will be September 19, 6 pm EST.
>
>The schedule:
>
>August 22 - I, Borg
>August 29 - The Next Phase
>September 5 - The Inner Light
>September 12 - Time's Arrow I
>September 19 - Time's Arrow II
>
>Is this not correct?
>
>Larry
>
>
>

No, it is not correct.

The schedule:

August 22 - Imaginary Friend
August 29 - I, Borg
September 5 - The Next Phase
September 12 - The Inner Light
September 19 - Time's Arrow I
September 26 - Time's Arrow II

					Eric
From: tbeavers@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Thad Beavers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Wanted:Episode List with descriptions
Date: 15 Aug 92 02:18:38 GMT
Organization: Ohio University CS Dept,. Athens


	I was looking for the list of episodes with the brief
	descriptions of the plot.  I had seen this before and
	would like to get a copy.  For the most part I 
	want last season but the entire list will be fine.
	Is there an ftp site where I can find it or could
	someone repost or mail it to me.

	Thanks
		Thad Beavers


-- 
_________________________________________________
= Thad Beavers   <tbeavers@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu>=
-------------------------------------------------
From: cegtitd@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Dodd)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Season Premiere:  Troi goes on a diet, swears off chocolate!
Date: 21 Aug 92 17:54:34 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

How else is she going to be able to compete with Ro and the
Bimbo of the Week for FatBoy's attentions?

Tim
-- 
"It is still an unending source of surprise for me to see how a few
scribbles on a blackboard or on a sheet of paper could change the
course of human affairs."   -- Stanislaw Ulam
Tim Dodd, Research Scientist, Georgia Tech  cegtitd@prism.gatech.edu
From: SMB128@psuvm.psu.edu (stacey bronstein)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The watch in Time's arrow
Date: 17 Aug 92 14:36:22 GMT
 <Bt0DoL.sF@cmptrc.lonestar.org>
Distribution: na
Organization: Mythos/Xcalbrin Inc.
X-School: Penn State University

I think it is samuel LANGHORN clemens, rather than longhorn....
                                           stace
From: dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Stephen Dowling)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: TOS actors
Date: 23 Aug 92 08:25:08 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.

ricky@adx.adelphi.edu (Ricky Glass) writes:
>
>That is casting the TOS actors in the TNG.  These people can't act,
>never did and never will.  If Doohan becomes a regular, I will be sorely
>dissappointed.
>
>I will become violently ill the first time Scotty says:
>"but cap'in the warp engines ..."

I must concur.  TNG is a quantum leap in maturity, let alone technology, over
TOS.
 
stephen dowling          dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org         minneapolis minnesota
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: Michael Scott Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: BABYLON 5: Rest of the Casting, First day of filming
X-Xxdate: Tue, 18 Aug 92 17: 57:12 GMT
Nntp-Posting-User: mss1@cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 17:54:24 GMT

Note removal of cross-posting...this debate belongs on Rec.arts.tv even
less than the topic that started it belongs on RASC...

In article <1992Aug14.194229.16018@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> JEFFERY ERIC
ROBERT, jeffery@ucsu.Colorado.EDU writes:
>I like the Babylon 5 information and I believe it belongs here.  It is
current
>information that Star Trek Fans want to hear (at least me and everyone I
know
>that is a fan).  Keep up the posts. 

I'm afraid I disagree--rather strongly. Yes, I want to see these updates
- I think this is going to be an absolutely FANTASTIC show.

But this is NOT a Babylon 5 group...it is a Star Trek group. Someone
should start an alt.tv.babylon5, methinks.

MSS
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jarnis@mits.mdata.fi (Jarno Kokko)
Subject: Re: What is the 25th Anniversary game?
Keywords: version, romulan, cloak
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 12:37:18 GMT

In article <1992Aug20.062521.22789@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> bdugan@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Bill Dugan) writes:
>>

[Info on the last battle of the 25th anniversary game deleted]

>Bill Dugan
>Interplay Productions

So you work for Interplay? Well, do you have ANY information about
any kind of 'extra missions' or a followup to this GREAT game?


>
>-- 
>Bill Dugan
>bdugan@gnu.ai.mit.edu


   ____________
 _| .signature |______________________________________________________
|                                                                     |
|  -------- Jarno Kokko --------  |  Borg: Prepare to be assimilated  |
|   --- jarnis@mits.mdata.fi --   |        by the Borg.               |
|    ---- Vantaa, Finland ----    |  Worf: Prepare to eat phasers.    |
|_____________________________________________________________________|


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: keiner@earthview.cms.udel.edu (Louis Keiner)
Subject: Re: Smithsonian
Reply-To: keiner@earthview.cms.udel.edu
Organization: Marine Studies, University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 20:24:48 GMT

Definately go and get your tickets early in the morning at the stand in the
lobby. When I went the day's ticket allotment was used up by noon. You can
grab them when the museum opens and look at the other exhibits or even go
to other museums until your assigned time rolls around.

Lou

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: USA Article: Scotty
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 16:47:49 GMT

In article <cole.713935707@lea> cole@lea.csc.ncsu.edu (Robert Cole) writes:
>gerlach@greyrock.mso.colostate.edu (Scott Gerlach) writes:
>
>>In article <AeX7_Va00VAt1B14V_@andrew.cmu.edu> rt16+@andrew.cmu.edu
>>(Robert Edward Timlin) writes:
>
>>>C'mon people! If you're using the transporter, have it power surge during
>>>an ion storm or something and beam him through time. Heck, the same thing
>>>beamed them across dimensions in "Mirror, Mirror", then why not time? Plus,
>>>it's REVERSIBLE (theoretically). Sheesh, they wouldn't even have to be 
>>>creative with that one. ARGH.
>
>>I agree, your suggestion is more plausible than being held in
>>molecular stasis for 70+ years.
>
>I disagree.  If you accept the idea of a transporter and that your
>"pattern" can be stored, then I see no reason why you can't be stored
>for an indefinte period of time.  In TOS, didn't they store some

The Writer's Guide technical information states quite clearly that
the amount of storage necessary to store the quantum states to hold
a human being in stasis is not available.  You could store the body,
but the brain would be effectively wiped.  The reason for this 
limitation is to prevent "magical rejuvenations" and such "evil
twin" and immortal characters crap.

I wouldn't be surprised if Scotty is retrieved from a ship in
one of the "Cause and Effect" loops.  Possibly that very
ship.

I'd much prefer that to some electronic fountain of youth that
could conceivably lessen the stakes of every plot conflict
in future episodes.

"Dead?  No problem.  Let's just look in the transporter.  Oh?
It blew out a frammistat modulator?  Darn!"  I frankly wouldn't
give a crap if they dump Doohan anyway.

GMS
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: avik@icase.edu (Avik Banerjee)
Subject: Re: Kirk References In TNG?
Organization: ICASE/NASA Langley
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 13:43:20 GMT

i believe there was a mention of a 'starship enterprise ncc1701 under the command of
capt. james t kirk` when the tng crew contracted the virus that made them all act
drunk. i think the crew was searching records atempting to find a cure. also theres
spocks speech in unification.

            ___ __    _ ______  __
           /   || |  / /| || | / /
          / /| || | / / | || |/ /
         / / | || |/ /  | || |\ \
        /_/  |_||___/   |_||_| \_\
  		@icase.edu
-----------------------------------------------
|"Only the insane have strength to prosper.   |
| Only those that prosper judge what is sane."|
-----------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: VOELS@usmv01.usm.uni-muenchen.de (Stephen A. Voels)
Subject: Re: Who Might Play Sisco?
Organization: University Observatory Munich, FRG 
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 17:37:33 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <1992Aug22.121119.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu> cfoster@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:

> In article <4898@sumax.seattleu.edu>, hirayama@sumax.seattleu.edu (Pat Hirayama) writes:
> > At CreationCon last weekend in Seattle, the clues they were handing
> > out were:
> > 
> > 	1.  the character will be played by a male, bald African-
> > 	    American actor.  It was implied that he has been on
> > 	    one other tv show and was successful in it.
> > 
> > 	2.  It is not Louis Gossett, Jr.  
> 
> 
> Here's a guess -- remember "Spenser: for Hire?"  The actor who played Hawk was
> black, bald and very talented.  Wish I could remember his name.
> 

Avery Brooks

> Before the "bald" clue was revealed, I would have said Paul Winfield, from Star
> Trek II and "Darmok."
> 
> 
> Chris
> > 					- pat
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Christopher J. Foster cfoster@eagle.wesleyan.edu or cfoster@wesleyan.bitnet
> 
> _____JIM_________
>     WHEN YOU HAVE
> FREE TIME (LIKE
> TAKING A DUMP)
> LOOK THESE ROUGHS
>        OVER. PHILL - note on storyboards for James Cameron's _Terminator_2_
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Stephen A. Voels
Uni.-Sternwarte Muenchen     Internet:  voels@usm.uni-muenchen.de
Scheinerstr. 1               Voice:     +49-89-92209437
8000 Muenchen 80  FRG        FAX:       +49-89-92209427
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Question about TOS
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 14:57:34 GMT
Keywords: TOS

In article <1992Aug14.060500.22825@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> eraitala@nyx.cs.du.edu (eric aitala) writes:
>Hi folks,
>
>	Here's a question for ya'll.  The Enterprise's mission under James Kirk was supposed to last five years.  Using the episodes from TOS and TAS, as well  as the novels, can anyone tell me how much of that time has been accounted for.
>I realize the novels are not canon and some are not from the five year mission, but I am still curious whether or not that time limit has been exceeded.
>{sort of like how M*A*S*H ran for eleven years and the Korean War was only four
>or five years long}

Well, depending on how much time passed between adventures, and how much was 
spent in transit, the three seasons of TOS could account for the entire 5 years.
In other words, since we have no set time reference, it's impossible to tell
what took place when. All we can tell from stardates is what happened before 
what.


-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"This mission will be very safe and lots of fun for all of you."
                           -- The Computer, Pre-Mega-Whoops Alpha Complex
From: lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: SPOILERS - For the birds....
Date: 20 Aug 92 19:35:53 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: duncan.cs.utk.edu
Originator: lape@duncan.cs.utk.edu

	With all this garbage about spoiler alerts, I just cannot help and
wonder why it offends people when they are not there.  If you do not want
to read, unsubscribe.  I know some of you would consider it common curtesy
to include spoilers, but c'est la vie.
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your laundry phosphate free?  Help stop global pollution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ahummel@ems.cdc.com (H. Austin Hummel)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Picard's mistake
Date: 17 Aug 92 13:05:06 GMT
Reply-To: you@ems.cdc.com
Organization: Empros Systems International, a division of CDC

In article <66115@hydra.gatech.EDU>, ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge A. Diaz) writes:
|> In article <12AUG199210012201@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov> smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Michael Neylon) writes:
|> >In article <scrotch.713581231@milton>, scrotch@milton.u.washington.edu (Lou Ciphre) writes...
|> 
|> >Ah, no.  Im pretty sure that Picard never had any flight training.  Second,
|> >when the manuever was tried before, all 5 pilots died. Picard wasnt probably
|> >part of that group :)
|> 
|> No, but they could have been attempting it and didn't get caught.  If
|> that kid on Wes' team hadn't gotten killed, they wouldn't have gotten
|> caught either (probably).  It's quite possible that Picard was trying the
|> same thing.  He did seem to realize exactly what the manuver was, and,
|> more importantly, he realized it the moment Geordi told him that the
|> whatchamacallit valve was open.
|> 
|> >In any case, it NOTHING on the scale of what Wesley's team did.  Picards
|> >problems sounds very very minor compared to the trouble that the team got
|> >into....
|> 
|> I'm not so sure...  He seem *awful* grateful to that old man.  Yes,
|> his problems sound minor compared to what the team got into, but think
|> if they hadn't lost a member of the team.  They wouldn't have been
|> caught (probably).

The point of the show was that reguardless of the death, the trick
was illegal, and probably minor punishment if TRUTH was stated first
with no coverup. This is in line with basic life interaction. The 
TRUTH is always easier and simplier. Great Episode.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: val@news.ccutah.edu (Val Kartchner)
Subject: Re: Season 6 Transporter
Organization: University of Utah Computer Center
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 23:03:11 GMT

Steve@celeborn.lvunix.com (Steve Slade) writes:
: In article <4943.110.uupcb@ssr.com> rich.friedman%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Rich Friedman) writes:
: >In article <712427105#macbeth.cs.duke.edu>, kirk@cs.duke.edu (Scooter Corleone) writes:
: >Actually, the reason is just the opposite. Rumors are that Scotty will
: >appear looking as he does in the time of TOS (more specifically, the
: >movies). In other words, he won't look any older. How can this be done?
: 
: Maybe they have ome good platic surgeons? he might look has he did in tos
: but have a lot of replaced organ and such.  and the doctor didn't want
: the same because of those damed computer parts inside him might make him
: feel more like spock.
(Actual spoilers ahead!!!)


What I very recently heard (on a local radio station) was that the Enterprise
would find a ship that has been adrift for 75 years.  They also find that
someone was in transit via transporter.  When they complete the transport,
they find out that it was Scotty.

Isn't there a time-limit on how long the pattern-buffer can maintain someone
in-transit?  Hey, when has precedent, logic, or physics ever stopped the TNG
writers before?  B5 is (supposedly) going to have more internal consistency.
We'll see.

--
|======================== The previous was my opinion =========///============|
| "AMIGA: The computer for the creative mind." (tm) Commodore /// Weber State |
| "Macintosh: The computer for the rest of us."(tm) Apple \\\///  University  |
|=================== val@csulx.weber.edu ==================\///=== Ogden, UT =|
From: atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk (A.M.T. Bell,G2,3123,homephone)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Deep Space Nine Casting
Date: 19 Aug 92 08:21:18 GMT
Reply-To: atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, UK

Dont you mean Michael Warren (Officer Hill in Hill St. Blues).

lets be careful out there....


tony bell                 ! keep on running                
serc daresbury laboratory ! live long and prosper
            atb@uk.ac.dl.gserv1
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder)
Subject: Re: Crew Eccentricities
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 19:35:57 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.203551.6025@msdhsv.ingr.com> foxx@foxxjac.b17a.ingr.com writes:
>(Roberta Rheaume (CPB)) writes:
>|> Just my $0.02
>|> 
>|> [...]
>|> BTW, why do all the women on ST:TNG have traditional (1992) jobs:
>|> 
>|> Guinan - waitress
>|> Crusher - nurse/doctor
>|> Troi - social worker (with bad taste in clothes)
>|> 

>It seems like nobody likes the jobs females have, but when they
>have jobs of less traditional roles, nobody likes the characters
>(Tasha, Shelby, Rho).  I would bet part of the problem lies in us
>the viewers.

Not true.  I have no problem with the roles that Yar, Shelby and Ro
fill.  In fact, Ro has been one of my favorite female characters from
the show to date.  I don't have many feelings towards the character of
Shelby one way or another, although I'll agree that forceful women in
television or even in reality are too often given the label of "bitch".

Yar?  Well, not only was her character very poorly written, but Crosby
was a dismal actress to boot.

And to the previous poster, since when is a woman doctor a "traditional"
sex-type profession?  Nursing, maybe, but not physician.

Guinan, the "waitress".  I don't know what bars you go to, but I've only
met a few female bartenders.  At least they've been in the overwhelming
minority when compared to the number of men in the field.  There's no
"traditional" female stereotyping here, either.

And Troi?  Well, what can anyone say to defend this one?  Who wants to?


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Schroeder	                |  Warning: prolonged exposure to this
schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |  .sig may cause retinal damage and 
Brookhaven National Laboratory  |  blistering skin rashes. 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: gbrach@galaxy.gov.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The Measure of a Man
Date: 13 Aug 92 09:28:20 -0700
Organization: BC Systems Corporation

In article <1992Aug12.072816.20142@intacc.uucp>, zerobeat@intacc.uucp (Ferenc Szabo) writes:
> In article <1992Aug10.042536.18793@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann) writes:
>>In article <65459@hydra.gatech.EDU>, ccoprdj@prism (Jorge Diaz) writes:
>>
>>>I don't understand where Star Fleet gets the *BALLS* to even suggest that
>>>Data belongs to them.
>>
>>Again, this is more Bruce Maddox than Starfleet.  My impression is that
>>he's made research into android his top priority.  In fact, it grows so
>>important that other considerations pale in comparison.  Notice how he
>>simply cannot see Data as a sentient being.  Since he is driven to
>>get Data above all else, he cannot see Data as sentient, otherwise he
>>has an intractable moral conflict.
>>
>>Military organizations tend to allow commanding officers broad authority
>>over the ranks in their command.  Thus, Commander Maddox had an ideal
>>environment to "kidnap" Data and treat him as an object, rather than
>>a person.
>>
> 
> Even if Starfleet had fully recognized Data's sentience and still wanted
> to go ahead with the deed it would pale in comparison to the many
> heinous things the military has done in the past (here.....in our
> universe).
> 
> Remember genetic testing, radiation testing, heavy drug testing,
> sleep deprivation on real live human beings.  Obviously I can't condone
> evilness, but it would make Star Trek better if some of that evil
> came from within and not from 'the other guys'.  Of course they have 
> sort of done this, but it's usually a lone crazed, hellbent or
> overly obsessed person.
> 
> Who wants:  "Lemonade, Itchy?"
>              "Thanks, Scratchy"
> 
> ferenc
> 
> 

'Measure of a Man' aired last night in the Pacific northwest; proving to me
once again that it it is one of the best STTNG has ever done.  Yes, there are
inconsitancies in the logic (but then how many military organizations are
consistant? B-{)); but personaly, I was too involved with the characterization
to pay much attention to that.  This episode is definitly the reason why I
care so much about Data, Picard and (yes even) Riker.

JMHO,

Gabor.
-- 
       t     Gabor Brach.	"Like the rat said:  'Keep the cheese,
    gttttt   Victoria, B. C.	 I just want out of the trap'"
gggg b t     (God's waiting			Chief Engineer Geordi LaForge
g  g b t      room)				"Where Silence has Lease"
gggg b  tt
   g bbbb
 ggg b  b	"...with a boulder on my shoulder, feelin kinda older,
 g g b  b        I tripped the merry-go-round..."
 ggg bbbb                                       B. Springsteen
From: judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The watch in Time's arrow
Date: 17 Aug 92 23:44:37 GMT
Distribution: na

In article <92230.103622SMB128@psuvm.psu.edu> SMB128@psuvm.psu.edu (stacey  
bronstein) writes:
> I think it is samuel LANGHORN clemens, rather than longhorn....
>                                            stace
hmmm, is that right?  I had thought that it was Longhorn, but I do not
know for certain.  Does anyone know for certain?

--
"I drank what?" -- Socrates

judson@watserv.ucr.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: Steve Hast <hast@courier4.aero.org>
Subject: Denise Crosby in Red Shoes Diaries
X-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 10:16:07 GMT
Organization: The Aerospace Corporation/Los Angeles
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d3
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 17:15:21 GMT

?7

 

 
 
 

*

4
4
R
?
?


Steve Hast                                       hast@courier4.aero.org 
The Aerospace Corporation                                
P.O. Box 92957,  Mail Station M4-946                     (310) 336-8968  
             
Los Angeles, CA  90009-2957                          FAX (310) 336-5827
=======================================================================
u
(a.k.a. Tasha Yar) on SHOWTIME.  Denise played a policewoman who arrests
a racketball player from her gym, takes him to an abandoned art
warehouse, and rape/seduces him.  Definitely 'hot'X?#B=

#
2H2xa1-
@
xB#i2
















?`

 As my wife put it, "Why don't the men ever take their clothes off?" 
Anyway, it's certainly worth watching if you are a Crosby fan.  Does
anyone know if this episode of Diaries will be repeated on SHOWTIME?  I
believe the show I watched was actually the second airing.  I would
appreciate any information about a repeat broadcast so I can videotape it
for my friends.




FG(?

-:LaserWriter

N Helvetica Narrow
Symbol
GoudyOldstyle
MT Extra[
?
[

Astrodynamics Department
From: wilde@husc9.harvard.edu (Robert Wilde)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Problem with gifs....
Date: 13 Aug 92 21:07:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc3.1992Aug13.170701.14703
Distribution: usa
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

In article <l8likpINNl4j@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu> lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape) writes:
>
>	WInGif barfs when reading the following two files from
>vab02.larc.nasa.gov:
>
>	sttng445.gif
>	sttng454.gif
>-- 
Whoa!  Did you ftp all the gifs to your PC?  Mighty big hard drive there. ;)

-- 
|                      | 
|Robert Wilde          | All science is physics or stamp-collecting.
|wilde@husc.harvard.edu|   -Ernest Rutherford
|                      |