From: bes@cco.caltech.edu (Behnam Sadeghi)
Subject: Re: The Lies of Mr Taqwaa and Arash.....
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 01:25:52 GMT

In article <2537@keele.keele.ac.uk> phd21@seq1.kl.ac.uk (A. Jaber) writes:
>>From: arash@sunee.waterloo.edu (Arash Jahangir)

>
>	I take the opportunity to congratulate you over your support
>	for the murderous regime of the Neo-Khomeinists. You have to
>	remember this stand when you come on the next to lecture every
>	body about humanity and human rights.
>...
>	If it was a rebellion it could have succeed and its momentum
>	will never be stopped. They always been Khomeinists agents they 
>	got what they desrve???

As for the 'rhetoric' above, fine.  Now, let's check your 'facts':

>	If the Khomeinists are intersted in helping Muslims as they
>	claim, they will not be helping the non-Muslim Armenians to
>	massacre the Shia Azeris. The Criminal Khomeinists are giving
>	Armenian Fuel and Weapons to kill Azeri Women and Children.

Absolutely baseless.  Iran hasn't given Armenia any arms at all.  In 
fact, Azerbaijan has expressed appreciation of Iran's role in that
region.  What is you proof for the weird claim that Iran has
given arms to Armenia?

>	If you want to see the proof go and ask the Azeri women who were
>	demonstrating against Khomeinist help to Armenia.

Ah, I see!  Now, where were these women demonstrating?  Did they claim
Iran gave Armenia arms?  If so, did they provide any evidence?  Where
is the proof?

>	The Khomeinist want to Terrorize the Azeri Population in Iran
>	itself by helping the Armenians.

Empty statement.

>	I will never claim that the Mujahedee Khalq are freedom fighters
>	they are being used by Iraq as an answer to the terrorism that
>	comes from the Supereme council for the Islamic revolution in
>	Iraq  which is based in Riyadh and Tehran.

Interesting to see how this Saddamite just loves the MKO.  But... the
feeling is mutual.  The MKO leadership (Maryam) has in the past has praised 
Saddam in glowing terms.  

>	I do not worship persons like most
>	of you, if Saddam is bad for his people they will remove him
>	not USA+34 more countries a part from Iranian infiltrators.

I agree that it is not up to the USA to change the Iraqi leadership.
This is the only thing you said that I agree with.  The US actions in 
Iraq were criminal and genocidal.  But, you shouldn't translate your
frustration with U.S. atrocities into support for Saddam and HIS atrocities.

>	Go and tell your own Kurds in Iran that they are your brothers
>	and see their reaction.

Iranian Kurds and Persians are brothers.  The relationship between two
armed Kurdish separatist groups and the Iranian government is another
matter.  The Iranian government has fought these armed groups, but has
not conducted acts of genocide against the Kurdish PEOPLE as Saddam 
has done.  Iran hasn`t wiped out hundreds Kurdish villages, has not gassed
thousands of Kurds, and has not forced Kurds to move out of their homes
and live in concentration camps in the South, acts that Saddam Hussain
is guilty of.  Remember that ONE MILLION Iraqi Kurds fled Saddam's forces
and took refuge in Iran and hundreds of thousands of them fled to Turkey.
Do you deny this?

>	And for the sake of your own Shias in Iraq tell them how you the
>	Khomeinists are helping to kill their Azeri Shia brothers in
>	Azebijan.

As I said, a totally absurd and baseless untruth.  No wonder you didn't
attempt to provide any sort of evidence.

> 			 ooooooo\
>                         oooooooo\
>              ____________________\________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>|         		       __    |  |  |       \ 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>|   |  .   |____!______!__!__!_____|___|  |  |        \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>|   |______| . .                          |  |        /
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>|____________________________________________|_______/
>			          /
>			  ooooooo/
>	                  oooooo/
>	

Regarding the picture of al-Hussain missile:

I feel sorry for any human being who calls himself a Muslim and supports
the killing of innocent civilian Muslims by missiles.  A few years into the
the war, Iran decided to retaliate against Iraqi attacks on Iranian
residential areas by hitting Iraqi residential areas, notably using 
artillary fire on Basra, and later missile attacks on Baghdad.  The 
attitude in Iran was that "we are forced to do this to stop attacks 
on OUR residential areas."  I myself personally totally opposed such 
attacks by Iran.

I noticed that in Iran people who supported Iran's attacks didn't feel any
pride or exuberance about it; they considered it a necessary evil.  

Your attitude seems to be the opposite.  You know full well what the 
Scud missile [aka al-Hussain] means to Iranian people who lived in
constant fear of it during the later stages of the war (e.g. an 
appartment near my house in Tehran was hit by such a missile and its
residents were killed).  Yet, you callously and shamelessly demonstrate
your pride in such attacks in soc.culture.iranian, a newsgroup whose
readership is mostly Iranian.  This sort of disgusting attitude can
only been from supporters of Saddam Hussain, a man who has exercised
genocide even on HIS OWN people and who launched two major wars in a
space of ten years.


Behnam Sadeghi


Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian