HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: glenn.frasier@ehbbs.hou.tx.us (Glenn Frasier) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 GA - Impress
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:44:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Ed Hopper's BBS - Houston, TX - 713-997-7575
Reply-To: glenn.frasier@ehbbs.hou.tx.us (Glenn Frasier) 

Jay Thierry HAN <HAN@FRECP12.BITNET> writes

JTH>Boot Manager (a feature of OS/2) will let you boot OS/2 from a logical
JTH>partition. The above setup is also mine (85/115 DOS/OS2 balance). I'm not
JTH>sure Boot Manager lets you boot DOS from a logical drive, though.

I have 2 130MB drives could I make the first a dos and the second a OS/2
HPFS drive?


just waiting for GA to get here.............
          Glenn.Frasier@ehbbs.hou.tx.us
From: ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 Device Drivers - Mastrianni Book
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 06:03:07 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

> Are there any US booksellers that will ship books such as this overseas?

Try "Computer Literacy Bookshops", which claim to be "the largest collection
of computer books in the world."

The phone number for phone orders is 408-435-1118 (prefixed, of course,
with whatever magic it takes to get to the US from where you are).

							Tim Smith
From: d88-pfo@tukur.nada.kth.se (Peter Forsberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Reformatting for OS/2 2.0 GA
Date: 13 Apr 92 09:00:51 GMT
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

In article <1992Apr08.202554.25585@slate.mines.colorado.edu> mbarkah@slate.mines.colorado.edu (Ade Barkah) writes:
   I'm aware that one should reformat the hard drive before installing
   the GA code over any of the previous betas.

   Question: do I need to reformat if I'm installing GA over my 1.3 SE
	     hpfs partition ? What if the partition wasn't a bootable
	     partition ? Can I make it bootable without reformatting ?

   The reason I'm asking is that I have a 330mb drive, and I don't have
   a tape drive to back it up with. Backing up 300+mb to floppies is
   out of the question for me.

You do *not* have to reformat to install 2.0 GA over 1.3. I don't think
you'll have any problems at all with the install.

Peter
--
Peter Forsberg           E-mail:  peterf@vnet.ibm.com          (primary)
                                  d88-pfo@nada.kth.se        (alternate)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: ianel@microsoft.com (Ian Ellison-Taylor)
Subject: Re: Microsoft and Me
Date: 09 Apr 92 07:57:14 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.

In article <12313@umd5.umd.edu> adhir@cygnus.umd.edu (Alok Dhir) writes:

[stuff about Windows apps detecting OS/2 2.0 and running slower to 
 really annoy everybody deleted]

This has got to be some kind of classic. I realise this originally appeared
in a PC mag but the number of people who have appeared to believe this junk
has been amasing.  I laughed so much I nearly hurt myself [paste link to 
animation of Ian falling off chair laughing]. Didn't it occur to anyone that
Windows apps run slower under 2.0 because it's not as good at running 
Windows apps as Windows 3.1 ????

OK, try it with some non-MS apps, write your own apps and try this, I bet
you get exactly the same results.

[NB - I didn't mean to say "bet" - bad choice of words :-) ]


Ian.
--
Ian Ellison-Taylor,
Not speaking for Microsoft.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith)
Subject: Re: IBM, are you listening? (Was: Windoze 3.1 is here.)
Keywords: Yesterday(4 April) I saw Windoze 3.1 for sale here.
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 05:09:05 GMT

brooke@cco.caltech.edu (Brooke Paul Anderson) writes:
>
>Remember, we get news faster than most other people on the planet -- we
>know some things before even some IBM employees find out.

How true.  You should have seen the expressions on people's faces
when I did a CRL-ALT-SHFT-o on OS/2 2.0's desktop yesterday at an
IBM rollout.

The IBM'ers actually told the crowd that IBM *might* include Win 3.1
support in OS/2 *if* there was a demand for it. :-(
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: prs9k@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Phillip Ruxton Scarr)
Subject: Trident Driver Review Request
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:33:02 GMT

OK, when the chips are down we can always look to Paradise/Western
Digital to make the WRONG move.  They have told me in no uncertain terms
that there will be NO OS/2 2.0 drivers produced for SVGA on the Paradise
Chipset EVER.  It is just not in their plans.  So I'm buying a Trident
chipset board.

Trident has released a seamless 800x600x16 driver for the WPS and I am
looking for people who are currently running to get their opinions of
its performance.  How fast is it?  How do the Windows programs behave
under it?  DOS programs?  How easy was it to install?

Obviously, if the drivers are flaky, then I'm stuck back in 640x480 mode
which I cannot live with.  I really need opinions on this ASAP.

I will be running OS/2 on a 386sx/20 from Gateway with 6mb of RAM
(hopefully soon to be 8mb).

	-Phil
--
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the aquisition of
unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-
industrial complex.  The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will exist."
From: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Michael D Kretzer)
Subject: Re: Whoops... bad driver in CONFIG.SYS
Originator: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Reply-To: tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 01:59:19 GMT

From article <prao.703467670@hcfmail>, by prao@ucsb.edu (Parik Rao):
> 
>  Thanks Bob!  That worked great.  BTW, Gerry (who suggested hitting ESC
> at the install procedure), that didn't work out.  I don't know exactly what
> happened, but apparently when you boot the install program it recognizes
> FAT drives only.  When I C:'d and dir a DIR, it said "unrecognized drive
> format".  

This isn't true.  All that's wrong is that there are some 'allocation 
errors' on the HPFS drive (obviously).  Just run CHKDSK /f on the
offending drive before doing C: and dir and everything will work out just
fine.  ESCing from the install program WILL recognize both HPFS & FAT
drives, but if you are trying to access an HPFS drive that wasn't
shut down properly, you will have to fix the allocation errors with CHKDSK /f
before trying to mess with the drive.
Organization: Freshman, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 04:41:56 -0400 
From: Faisal Nameer Jawdat <fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: NT (Was : Re: Some questions about OS/2......)
	<1992Apr15.192553.26073@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>
Distribution: usa


according to PC magazine, NT may (as in, rumour says it will) need a 486
with 16 megs memory and 400 megs harddisk space
sounds like they actually are targetting unix and not os/2 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: scdorcy@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (JAMES DORCEY)
Subject: Re: Pause before you consider OS/2 (was Re: Win 3.1 not THAT great.)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 10 Apr 1992 16:03 EST  

I found this in comp.windows.misc.  Since many of these are inconsistent 
with the majority of the items I've seen here, maybe Tim or someone might 
take a stab at commenting on what is alledgedly InfoWorld's comments:

In article <DEMILLO.92Apr10140113@egeus.juliet.ll.mit.edu>, 
demillo@juliet.ll.mit.edu ( Robert DeMillo ) writes...

>Well...before you consider...
> 
>According to InfoWorld:
> 
>OS/2 2.0 will *not* be compatable with Windows 3.1
>OS/2 2.0 will *not* support SVGA or XGA graphics modes. (The
>	 above poster's comments about OS/2 supporting a 32-bit 
>	 SVGA engine, notwithstanding.)
>OS/2 2.0 Windows emulation will support only one Windows application
>         per Window, and they are several orders of magnitude slower
>	 than just running in Windows. You can switch OS/2 2.0 to
>	 full screen Windows mode, and your Windows performance
>	 goes way up.
>OS/2 2.0 will not support full-blown pre-emptive multitasking for
>         another 12-18 months. (Not sure what they meant by this,
>	 but it didn't smell right.) At that time, Windows NT
>	 will be on the scene.
> 
>Moral: If you are buying OS/2 for OS/2...great. Do it..multithreading
>       is a good thing, and OS/2 has it. If you are buying OS/2 
>       'cuz you want to run mostly Windows applications in OS/2's
>       PM...you might want to rethink that.
>
>--
> - Rob DeMillo			| Internet: 	 demillo@juliet.ll.mit.edu
>   MIT Lincoln Lab 		| Also Internet: rjd@brown.cs.edu
>   Weather Sensing - Group 43	| Reality: 617-981-2105 (office)
> 
>"Operation Goofy now in effect!"
>	--- Tom Servo, "Gamera vs. Gaos," Mystery Science Theater 3000


Jim Dorcey
From: jstewart@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Trident video drivers
Date: 10 Apr 92 11:30:31 GMT
Organization: Wright State University


	How do I tell which chipset my trident video card has?  The drivers new
don't seem to work, and I think this might be the problem.

						John STewart
From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 Live at Comdex
Date: 8 Apr 92 03:56:38 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
Organization: The Village Waterbed
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM

In  <92098.211010U25042@uicvm.uic.edu>  Bob  Jackiewicz <U25042@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
> In article <9204071911.AA08145@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, pebly@vnet.ibm.com (Bob
> Pebly) says:
> >
> >Just finished watching Lee Reiswig demo OS/2 2.0 live at Comdex.  The
> >last item in the demo was a copy of Windows =>3.1<= running in a
> >window on the 2.0 desktop!                    ~~~
>
> I especially liked the way he was playing dumb on this issue right before
> he showed it. He said, with sarcasm, I'm sure, that they got it to run (3.1)
> 24 hours after shipping the GA disks to the printer. :-)

Didn't he say that they had it running 24 hours after *3.1* was available?
I.e., Windows 3.1 shipped on the 6th, and Lee showed it running under OS/2
2.0 on the 7th.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
From: harris@catt.ncsu.edu (Michael Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Help me install OS/2 on a Clone...
Date: 11 Apr 92 07:17:32 GMT
Reply-To: harris@catt.ncsu.edu (Michael Harris)
Organization: NCSU CATT Program

I personally know very little about clones so I thought I would ask here
first.  I am trying to help someone install OS/2 on his clone.  All versions
of OS/2 fail with a "The system cannot find the file A:\COUNTRY.SYS" error.

For OS/2 1.3, this error occurs shortly after the copyright screen.  For
Beta and GA versions of 2.0, it occurs after the OS/2 logo screen after
"Please wait" moves to the top of the screen.

I have tried with and without a harddisk.  I have switched the 5 1/4" drive
with the 3 1/2" drive.  I have tried running with turbo off.  I have tried
turning off shadow ROM.  I have tried removing all cards except for video
and harddisk.  If anyone knows anything about this kind of problem, please
kindly send me some info.  Here's the hardware:

Computer Directions SYS/386 Mini-Tower (25Mhz in Turbo mode)
8MB of Memory on Motherboard
HD Type 47
AMI BIOS 30-0300-ZZ1123-00101111-050591-SUN3-SX-F  05/05/91
Goldstar Floppy/Game/IDE Controller (Model? = CA8392-F - Not sure about
   model.  That was a number printed on the circuit board)
SoundBlaster
SVGA display card (didn't get info... it really shouldn't matter about an
   error like this now should it?)

Any suggestions are appreciated.
______________________________________________________________________________
     Michael Harris - harris@catt.ncsu.edu or harris@carvm3.vnet.ibm.com
 Vice-President, Computer and Technologies Theme Program, NC State University
(My opinions are my own and do not represent those of NCSU or IBM Corporation)
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: A question about PROGMAN.EXE and ATM
Date: 12 Apr 92 16:32:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: midway.1992Apr12.163248.12369
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Apr11.234720.11036@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> prs9k@virginia.edu writes:
>Just out of curiosity, if you run PROGMAN.EXE (the Windows Program
>Manager) as a seamless window, can you then install applications like
>Ami Pro or Page Maker which like to find PROGMAN running?  Also, can you
>launch windows apps from within this seamless PROGMAN session and are
>they then seamless apps?  Ohhhh, how Zen...

Yes, and yes.  Indeed.

>Oh, I still haven't heard, do the seamless windows apps use the OS/2 ATM
>or not?  I assume they do, but I'd like a definate answer...

IBM opted for what probably is a better approach, although it does
require more hard disk space.  They bundle ATM for Windows with OS/2
2.0.  So there are actually two typeface rendering engines in the
product.  And, with the exception of the bundled, basic typefaces,
these engines can share typeface files (but note that you need three
files now to cover all bases: PFB, AFM, and PFM files) -- if you
install them in \OS2\DLL (where OS/2 requires the files to be, it
seems).
-- 
Timothy F. Sipples       Keeper of the OS/2 Frequently Asked Questions
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu  List, available via anonymous ftp from
Dept. of Economics       128.123.35.151, directory pub/os2/faq, or via
Univ. of Chicago  60637  netmail from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET.
From: mo@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Mohit Goyal)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: IBM's advertising for OS/2, and event in Austin
Date: 8 Apr 92 03:54:57 GMT
Reply-To: mo@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Mohit Goyal)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
Originator: mo@mickey.cc.utexas.edu

Hello.  First of all, I went to IBM's unveiling of OS/2 in Austin today.  It
was well done, and their were over 100 people their.  They showed most of
the IBM's unveiling of OS/2 at Comdex, and at that announcement, IBM 
announced that IBM would have the largest marketing campaign it has every
had for any product, for OS/2 v2.0, and he said it started yesterday(4-6-92).
I haven't seen anything yet, but it is nice to know it is underway.  Anyways,
the people their were very informative, their were about 10 people their who
are a part of Team-OS/2.  They gave away 6 copies of OS/2 v2.0(Yes, *I* saw
a shrink-wrapped copy of v2.0!!  To bad I didn't win one), and a PS/2 model
35 with 6 megs and an 80 meg hard drive.  Anyways, I am of the belief that one
needs 6 megs of RAM to run OS/2 well.  4 megs is the minimum, but the people
their told me that they recommend 6 megs to get good performance.  I have four
megs now and will probably upgrade to 8 megs.  They also said that the retail
stores that sell OS/2 will either match the $49 upgrade price for Windows
to OS/2, or sell it for more and offer a mail-in rebate.  Either way, you
only end up paying $49 for the upgrade.  I'm thinking this is the quickest
way to actually get a copy of OS/2 v2.0, because stores are going to start
getting copies of OS/2 v2.0 next week.  You can go in and buy a copy for $49
with a Windows page and go home and install it, or you can pay more than $49
for the upgrade, go home and install it, and wait for your rebate.  This
is much quicker than waiting a month for your copy in the mail.  Of course,
this depends on how soon your local software seller get v2.0.  I picked up
a copy of today's Wall Street Jounal and Dallas Morning News, and their were
big ads by software company advertising Windows 3.1.  CompUSA is even offering
the upgrade for $45!  I can only hope companies do the same when OS/2 2.0 
arrives at their stores.

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Subject: Re: Tape Backup ?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 21:56:00 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

This has been discussed a lot here and while it is cool to back up from a DOS
box, restore won't work.  A question of EA's.
-- 
Bob Cain    rcain@netcom.com   408-358-2007

"There are some strings.  They're just not attached."
                                                    Victoria Roberts
From: duggan@cc.gatech.edu (Rick Duggan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: I give up!
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:51:14 GMT
Organization: College of Computing

In article <1992Apr9.183151.26816@hemlock.cray.com> bgm@cray.com (Bert Moshier) writes:
>In article <1992Apr8.071538.21968@news.Hawaii.Edu> tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen) writes:
>>Bert Moshier writes:
>>
>>>
>>>Just wondering .... Has anyone tried using the address and seeing if
>>>"microsoft.com" bounces it.  Maybe it is a valid address?
>>
>>The 'finger' command responds with "In real life:  ???", so microsoft.com
>>doesn't know who user bgates is.  Seems like a well done hoax.
>
>I did not know Microsoft was so open.
>
>Anyway I tried:
>
>finger bill@microsoft.com
>finger gates@microsoft.com
>finger william@microsoft.com
>finger III@microsoft.com

Here's what happens when you try finger billga@microsoft.com

[microsoft.com] 
Login name: billga    			In real life: Bill Gallagher
Directory: /usr/b/billga            	Shell: /bin/csh
Never logged in.
Project: Net Security
Plan:
Pretend I'm someone else and get lots of misaddressed mail.

Note the last line...to whom could he be referring :-)?

-rick
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: pdc@lunch.wpd.sgi.com (Paul Close)
Subject: Re: Phoning Diamond about Drivers.
Originator: pdc@lunch.wpd.sgi.com
Reply-To: pdc@sgi.com (Paul Close)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 01:58:58 GMT

dougb@novell.com (Doug Barlow) writes:
>horan@ecs.umass.edu writes:
>>Does anyone have a number for Diamond (as in diamand speedstar).
>>I'm trying to call and ask about drivers for my card, but no one answers
>>the number:
>>408-736-2000
>>
>>Is there a new one?  Or has anyone heard news?

According to the BBS, Diamond is waiting for drivers from Tseng labs and
S3 for the SpeedStar and Stealth, resp.  According to Diamond, S3 has not
released dates (as of 4/9), although people who have called Diamond more
recently report that they should be a few weeks.  The holdup is S3, not
Diamond.  All S3-based cards are in the same situation.

Also no word on whether they're rewriting the S3 drivers, or just shipping
them as-is from S3.

>[Doug Barlow's personal] ratings of Diamond:
>
>Products vs. Cost:  A+
>800 number: F
>phone hold time:  D-  (usually 10+ minutes)
>Availability of drivers for older products: B+ (WP 5.1, CADs, WIN 3.0)
>Availability of drivers for brand new products: D  (Windows 3.1 support)
>Friendliness of people on the phone: A
>People returning calls: D-
>Phone system: F-

I've only used their BBS.  It's great!  (when you can get on :-(  The number
is 408-730-1100.

To continue Doug's ratings,

BBS technical support: A- (takes a couple days, but good answers)
BBS ease of access: D
	(Takes many, many tries, probably due to Windows 3.1 drivers being
	available and >1meg!!!)

The Diamond Stealth product manager is available on-line and regularly
answers questions and posts updates about BIOS revisions, VESA compliance,
etc.  I'm quite pleased, and it's due to the BBS that I'm buying a Diamond
Stealth instead of a competing product (like Orchid's Fahrenheit 1280.  What
a useless BBS!).

Of course, the fact that it's a local call sweetens the deal....  But I
didn't rate it based on cost, just usefulness.  My average connect time is
only minutes (I read the messages off-line).
-- 
Paul Close	     pdc@sgi.com	   ...!{ames, decwrl, uunet}!sgi!pdc

    Oh, no!  You walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 00:37:24 CDT
From: brdiller@houvmscc.VNET.IBM.COM (Barry Diller)
Subject: Houston OS/2 2.0 Meeting
Reply-To: brdiller@houvmscc.VNET.IBM.COM (Barry Diller)
Organization: IBM FSSC
News-Software: UReply 2.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc

                The Houston Area League of PC Users
                                and
                                IBM
                  invite you to a special meeting

                        Date: April 14, 1992
                           Time: 7:00 PM
                     Location: George R. Brown
                         Convention Center

             Admission is free and open to the public.

                            John Soyring

         IBM Director of Software Development Programs will
       present OS/2 2.0 at its best. John is an executive who
        KNOWS OS/2 2.0 inside and out. Please bring all your
                             questions.

Drawings will be held for an IBM Laptop Computer (386SX) and several
                        copies of OS/2 2.0.
From: manne@Minsk.docs.uu.se (Magnus L|vkvist)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 and Norton
Date: 14 Apr 92 18:54:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: bern.manne.703277660
Organization: UDAC, Uppsala, Sweden

aefros@cc.utah.edu (ALEXEI EFROS) writes:


>Hi, all you OS/2 gurus!

>I have a question. Will OS/2 DOS emulator be able to run Norton Commander 
>and/or Norton Utilities? I really depend on Norton Commander and cannot
>afford to loose it. Also, is Mr.Norton thinking about porting his wonderful
>products to OS/2? 

>Thanks,
>Alexei

No problems with Norton Commander. I can't use a computer without it...

/Magnus
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: My OS/2 GA Won't Install!
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:06:26 GMT

For those experiencing installation problems with OS/2 2.0 release
version, the workaround posted by BJ recently seems to be the right
way to go.  I'll summarize the procedure:

(1) DISKCOPY Disk 1 of the installation package; set the original
aside and use the copy during installation.
(2) Using a text editor, modify the duplicate Disk 1's CONFIG.SYS,
replacing "BASEDEV=IBM1S506.ADD" with "REM BASEDEV=IBM1S506.ADD".
(3) Boot the installation diskette and proceed with the first five
diskettes of the install.
(4) After diskettes 1 through 5 are processed, you are asked to
reinsert the installation diskette.  Do so.  After copying more files,
you are asked to remove the Install diskette and press Enter.  Do so,
but just after you hit enter and immediately after the screen clears,
reinsert the diskette.
(5) After a while you are asked to insert Disk 1.  Do so (the modified
duplicate, of course).
(6) After a while you are asked to hit Enter or Esc.  Hit Esc.  You
will then get an OS/2 command line prompt.
(7) At the OS/2 command line prompt, type the following:
	RENAME C:\OS2\IBM1S506.ADD IBM1S506.XXX		[Enter]
	COPY C:\OS2\IBMINT13.I13 C:\OS2\IBM1S506.ADD	[Enter]
Substitute the drive you are installing to if it is not C:.
(8) Remove the diskette from the drive and reboot.  Pick up the
installation from there.
-- 
Timothy F. Sipples       Keeper of the OS/2 Frequently Asked Questions
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu  List, available via anonymous ftp from
Dept. of Economics       128.123.35.151, directory pub/os2/faq, or via
Univ. of Chicago  60637  netmail from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc