HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 16:15:11 GMT

In article <BruL32.Ivw@news.cso.uiuc.edu> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.185909.1412@walter.bellcore.com> nobody writes:
>
>>Another man wrote:
>>>An ex-SO and I spent a four day weekend in bed... of course there were trips
>>>to the bathroom (some things just can't be ignored) and the kitchen (ever seen
>>>"9 1/2 weeks"? :).
>>
>>If there was ever such a thing as an ExclusiveMaleThread, this would be it.
>
>Walter!  You little sexist piglet.

Thank you dearie.

>I do vehemently beg to differ.   Having been the participant of a couple 
>of those four day weekends  (weekdays?) in bed, I must remind you it does
>take two for nude twister ( well, at least two).

The phrase "ExclusiveMale" referred to the tendency to sustain the thread
not the act. Need another clue?

						Walter

What disclaimer?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: FratFollises
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 13:28:46 GMT

sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
] In article <l6oufuINNphm@skat.usc.edu> tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy)
] writes:
] >  Also I didn't know SDSU
] >was known for its academic aspects anyway, the only reason people I know even
] >applied there is because it made the Playboy Top 10 party schools.
] 
] Ad hominem attack, rather foolish from someone attending the
] University of Spoiled Children.
] 
] >	Did you have a good time spitting on our returning soldiers and calling
] >them baby killers too?
] 
] Don't you know you're going to lose arguments when your opponent was
] there and all you know is what you should have learned in history
] class?


Trivia Question Time:

How Many Fratboys got Fragged?

How Many FratBoys should Have Been Fragged.

Kiddies if we want to play at DickWavingGames,
Please either take it over to alt.politics.homosexuality
where it can be appreciated in all of its ManlyGlory,
or Some place like alt.flame where it can be fully
appreciated for its intellectual content....


ciao
drieux

ps: Smile MotherFucker when you say BabyKiller[tm]!!!!!


-- 
I Do Not Believe in .sig files
as they are such a Known Waste Of BandWidth,
And Therefore Not a Morally UpRight Choice.
But I Can See the HideousHienousHandOfHeteroSexualityBehindItAll.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: nothing but garbage!!
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 02:16:17 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <2149@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com> luzenko@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Luzenko) writes:

>       I just read these soc.singles for the first time. I may be a
>little to serious for for this group. It seems any creature will
>materalize under a rock hidden from the sun. But bring the light of day
>to these vermin and they vanish.

Hold on, let me get my flashlight so I can get a look at you ...

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:55:59 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <l6qr5iINN4g6@news.bbn.com> Bonger writes:
|
|>Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
|>girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
|>you knew she was only 14 years old.
|>
|>Would you ??
|>
|>a/	Without a second thought
|>b/	Only if you knew you would not be caught
|>c/	?

My last SO had a seriously gorgeous daughter that was 15 years old.  She
modeled quite a bit and has entered and won several beauty contests. Although
she wasn't making any passes at me she wasn't a virgin either.  How would
*that* change your scenario.

In either case I would vehemently decline.

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
From: tesla.njit.edu!sjo2693@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: <None>
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:19:00 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <1992Jul21.204551.5268@uwm.edu>, markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark 
William Hopkins) writes:
> In article <1992Jul21.092036.1@tesla.njit.edu> sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu 
writes:
>>In article <1992Jul20.173849.12055@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>, 
ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>>> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>>>>I think the highest compliment I got in that respect was when he said,
>>>>" wow, I almost passed out on that one."
>>> 
>>> Sure beats the heck out of "I especially liked it when you moved!"
>>Know what you mean about passing out..been there...so was she
> 
> Now that we got the pleasure dimension all discussed out, here's a related
> question this time on the temporal dimension:
> 
>          What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
>          making love with someone?
I prefer lovemaking to last as long as two people can stand but my RP
(romantic partner)doesn't want sex to last..not as high a priority for
her as me....opposite sex drives....Oh well.... 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: long hair
Date: 22 Jul 92 22:22:41 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <1992Jul22.102721.2848@memstvx1.memst.edu> mcsweinberg@memstvx1.memst.edu writes:
>Hi, I'm not sure if I'm jumping in here on a serious discussion or what
>but In my personal preference (not that any of you would care) but I have
>this rule about guys with hair longer than mine I don't date them. Hey
>so I'm stuck in stereotypes of guys short hair women long hair... Or maybe
>I just know what I like. For those of you who don't read alt.personals
>don't ask me who I am.

Some of us who *do* read alt.personals still don't know who you are. :-)

-- 
Michael Rawdon
rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

RandomSort:  It sorts numbers in constant order time, but does not guarantee 
correctness.
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Net.Women
Keywords: good looking cute beautiful etc.
Date: 29 Jul 92 13:38:49 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Jul28.193425.13239@med.umich.edu> blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
>I friend of mine and are are having a dispute as to whether there
>are actually any good looking net.women that read this news group.
>Any suggestions as to how this dispute could be settled?

Yes, I have a solution.  We could line you both up and shoot you
dead.  That should take care of your dispute.

-Nance
-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*  | Discussions welcomed. 
att!ihlpk!colucci                               | Trollers discouraged.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tadg@quaestor.uucp (Tad C. Glines)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: The Curious
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 06:32:07 GMT

During periods of history where the average life span was around 30yrs the
average age of marage was about 12-14. How old is to old isn't determined
so much by age but by social norms. Maturity isn't determined by age either.
There are people 30 years old that still have the emotional maturity of a 
14yr old. So instead consider active self initiated wilingness on the part
of the 14yr old and consideration for other peoples needs on the part of
any posible SO. 
In short consent and consideration for each others needs is all that
realy matters.

Legality aside of course.
-- 
Tad   { E-Mail ...!uunet!quaestor!tadg }  My opinions don't care what I think.
E-mail of a conversational and reasonably sized nature are welcome.
Dreaming of.... A virus that kills only politicians :-)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
From: mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 17:06:16 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana

In article <1992Jul29.035035.16360@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
>But it wasn't a perfectly fine activity, people were dying.  It may be
>suprising but 55 *does* save lives.  If you don't believe me come to
>Canada were the speed limit is 100km/h (60 mph), 110km/h in some areas,
>and the police (in Ontario) won't pull you over for speeding unless your
>doing over 120km/h.  As a result we have some of highest accident rates
>in the world.  

Hmmm.  Where are these stats from?
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Starry, Starry Night
Date: 23 Jul 92 22:21:32 GMT
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto

drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>In article <92201.34487.NMICELI@avm.cc.fsu.edu> NMICELI@avm.cc.fsu.edu writes:
>>     Northwestern, huh...(And is that Dr. Max, rather than
>>     a mere grad student (g)? Please forgive my mistake in the
>>     previous post, if that's the case.)  In what field are you
>>     working?
>>
>>     And what's going on in the greater Chicagoland area?
>>     (Besides da Cubs and da Sox?)
>Do you realize that you are posting questions that are directed solely at
>me to over 80,000 people? Do you really think I'm likely to answer them?

I have a vision of a pot calling a kettle black.

Nahh.  Must be a stress-induced hallucination.

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: palou@osnome.che.wisc.edu (Ignasi Palou-Rivera)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Chemical Engineering
Date: 23 Jul 92 13:36:45
	<1992Jul22.165024.26729@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>
In-reply-to: markn@ssd.comm.mot.com's message of Wed, 22 Jul 1992 16:50:24 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.165024.26729@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> markn@ssd.comm.mot.com (Mark Nowak) writes:

>   Before labelling having sex with a 14-year-old girl as sick, I think
>   that values have changes a lot over the years.  Wasn't Juliet 14
>   when she married Romeo?

But, how old was Romeo?

>  Mayan women married at the age of 16.  Also,

And they had human sacrifices too, good reference.

>   ever wonder why teenage girls are often so attractive?  It's just 
>   evolution at work.  These girls are sexually mature.  They can have
>   children and Nature makes them attractive to would-be fathers.  The
>   problem with sex with a 14-year-old comes from society's dim view
>   of it.  I'd say society is pretty screwed up.

Your same argument could be easily used to justify sexual assault, rape, 
and the majority of crimes (that car looked so good, it was screaming
to me  to drive it...)

>   Mark Nowak


Ignasi.

--
Ignasi Palou-Rivera		palou@osnome.che.wisc.edu
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, U. of Wisconsin, Madison.
From: cs.ucla.edu!gds@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 22 Jul 92 23:20:00 GMT
Organization: too funky
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <1992Jul22.110524.8580@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil 
Postlethwaite) writes:
>Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
>girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
>you knew she was only 14 years old.

>Would you ??

>a/ Without a second thought
>b/ Only if you knew you would not be caught
>c/ ?

To look at this from a different perspective, my grandmother (mother's
mother) was 15 when she got married to my grandfather, who was 24.
Presumably, they had sex on their wedding night or sometime around
then.  It seems that this question boils down to a legal one as
opposed to an ethical one.  If it weren't illegal for an adult to
sleep with a minor, I don't see what the problem would be, provided
she consented and was mature enough to make the decision.
(Switch/replace genders as appropriate.)

--gregbo
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 17:54:44 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.110524.8580@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:
>
>Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
>girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
>you knew she was only 14 years old.
>
>Would you ??

Well, I never have before--I suppose it's just some sort of weird age
hang-up on my part.
From: mitch@novavax.UUCP (Mitch Silverman)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Pickup Lines
Date: 26 Jul 92 00:22:18 GMT
Reply-To: mitch@novavax.nova.edu (Mitch Silverman)
Organization: Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida

In article <MARTINC.92Jul9010004@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

>Sounds great, Mark.  Write and let us know how it works out.  Is your
>hospitalization paid up?

ILOL!  You hit the nail on the head--it's honest, yet doomed to failure.
A certain measure of pretend disinterest seems to be an element in the human
mating dance--as with many other animals.

Oh, and in article <MARTINC.92Jul9011357@grover.cs.unc.edu>
martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
 
>Hmmm.  Let's try another one of those hypotheticals.  (Sometimes I think
>I should have been a rabbi.)
 
Funny, you don't look Jewish.  8-)
 
But seriously, sometimes I feel the same way.  Well, I could still do it.
 
At least I'd stii be able to date....
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:20:38 GMT

drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>Feminine means skimpy silk undies underneath blue jeans

Feminine is closing on a property sale - with finesse.

Feminine is that great feeling of getting in the shower after
cutting the grass and changing the oil.

Feminine is skiing a NASTAR course at breakneck speed.

Feminine is reaching through a wall of men at a newsstand for
a copy of Club International and paying for it without caring
what anyone thinks.

Feminine is showing your 9-year-old kid how to throw and catch a
softball.

Feminine is doing counted cross-stitch, polishing rocks, and
collecting old license plates.

Feminine is being able to change a tire without ruining your
nails.

Feminine is wearing pink Hanes Her Ways panties (and nothing
else) between freshly washed cotton sheets ....


-Nance
-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*  | Discussions welcomed. 
att!ihlpk!colucci                               | Trollers discouraged.
From: annan@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: So ...
Date: 21 Jul 92 09:03:06 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAXcluster

In article <19370@optima.cs.arizona.edu>, jiang@cs.arizona.edu (Howard) writes:
> what is the significance of this newsgroup? I have read so many posts and
> follow-up flames here that it makes alt.* comp.* and in.general.* look stupid.
> Is there a point to this base or what? From what i've gathered, this is what's
> going on:
> 
> Man: some message about something sexual
> Woman: bashes it, then introduces something opposite
> Another Man: praises the first man, argues with woman
> Another Woman: agrees with second man, but mods the point
> First Man: apologizes, thanks second man, re-writes first point
> New Woman: (recursion)
> 
> So?

So, what do you want for nothing? A rubber biscuit?????

Boing boing boing.

-- 
James Annan.
                [--------------------------------------]
                [  "The only good Tory is a lavatory"  ]
                [--------------------------------------]
From: shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Comment on men's hair length
Date: 28 Jul 92 18:06:41 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <Bs34zA.58o@news.udel.edu> moody@brahms.udel.edu (John David Moody) writes:
>It seems like an interesting debate, so I might as well add my 1/50 dollar
>worth.
>
>Several girls I talked to back in college (and women) have said that the
>hair length with they liked best on men depended on the man's build.
>
For me, it depends a great deal on what the man's hair looks like, and
less on his build.  There are a number of net.men who have really great
hair, including: Ray Trent, Ed Tecot, Dave Taylor, Kayvan Sylvan, Drieux,
Ted Lemon, and Oleg Kiselev.  None of these men looks at all alike: they
are different heights and different builds, but I wouldn't say that any
of them (at least, the last time I saw them) wore their hair short.
 
They're all very attractive men, and their hair just sorta adds to their
appeal.....
From: wjb@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Bill Buse)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 17:10:18 GMT
Subject: Re: NOT Pickup Lines, ferchrissake, but being InTeReSting, maybe
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Loveland, CO
Newsgroups: soc.singles

In soc.singles, terrylee@wpi.WPI.EDU (The Cookie Goddess) writes:

 > "Want to watch the sun rise?"

Maybe this falls more into the unusual or different dates discussion, but
one date idea for morning persons is to meet early in the morning and watch
the sun rise together and then go out for breakfast.   :-)  

Bill 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Subject: Re: I'm Crushed
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 05:21:37 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <AeQAu4i00VB20R9UsK@andrew.cmu.edu> "Francis J. Yenca" <fy03+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Stef Jones writes:
>>I'll say.
>>
>>But maybe we should go a round in the ring for the title of
>>soc.singles.deity.funny, just for the heck of it.
>
>But Stef, this is not fair!
>You already know that you have two votes!
>
>Frank
>(vote number one)

Make that three.  <smirk>
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Babbage's Birthday Bargain Bash -- December 26th, 1992
From: sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: <None>
Date: 22 Jul 92 14:19:27 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology

In article <1992Jul21.204551.5268@uwm.edu>, markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
> In article <1992Jul21.092036.1@tesla.njit.edu> sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu writes:
>>In article <1992Jul20.173849.12055@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>, ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>>> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>>>>I think the highest compliment I got in that respect was when he said,
>>>>" wow, I almost passed out on that one."
>>> 
>>> Sure beats the heck out of "I especially liked it when you moved!"
>>Know what you mean about passing out..been there...so was she
> 
> Now that we got the pleasure dimension all discussed out, here's a related
> question this time on the temporal dimension:
> 
>          What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
>          making love with someone?
I prefer lovemaking to last as long as two people can stand but my RP
(romantic partner)doesn't want sex to last..not as high a priority for
her as me....opposite sex drives....Oh well....
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: NOT Pickup Lines, ferchrissake, but being InTeReSting, maybe
Keywords: lime Jello, cops, snakes, hematomas, diseases
Date: 26 Jul 92 04:59:38 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: QQQCLC

In article <thurlow.711944642@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
>In <1992Jul23.034702.15825@osf.org> oaf@serverx.osf.org (Oded Feingold) writes:
>>Does anyone know if Kenn Barry survived the last earthquack?
>
>I'd bet he's still ducking ...

	No, I couldn't afford the bill. Welcome back, Oded!

						Kenn
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Subject: Re: Why are Women *SO* Vain ??
Reply-To: arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 08:30:54 GMT

>>
>>Why are women just *SO* vain.
>>
>>Lip-stick, mascara: generally loads of make-up.
>>Lots of hairspray and gallons of perfume.
>
>Before I jump on ya, Neil, maybe you just have a fucked-up definition of "vain".
>I think by vain, people usually mean that a vain person thinks they're god's 
>gift to good-looking (in this context) and that you'd be blind not to want to 
>jump them.  Anyway, that being my opinion, then how can you call a woman who 
>wears a lot of make-up necessarily vain? Maybe it's that she's overly 
>insecure or thinks she's particularly *un*attractive and therefore NEEDS 
>make-up. 
>
>I know a lot of you want to avoid the old "women shouldn't wear make-up" thread
>and frankly, so do I, but I'd rather try to explain why some of us DO wear a 
>lot (in my case just a little) of make-up, push-up bras, perfume, hair dye,
>etc., etc., etc...   Now, in my opinion, if this were a perfect world, 
>women wouldn't NEED to do this to get the man they want.
>
>Now, don't get me wrong, I know some of you wouldn't WANT the type of man that
>expects you to look Cosmo-perfect just for him to date you, and ideally I'd
>rather avoid them myself.  BUT, I've found that most of the time, to get the
>attention of the kind of man I want, I need something to make me look more 
>atractive.  I'll admit it, contrary to popular belief, I'm not PERFECT 
>and my skin often can use a little overall smoothing of color and my hair
>gets LOTS more compliments when it's as red as possible, so yeah, I do go to
>certain lengths for my appearance.  But the only reason I do is that it seems
>to be what *works*.  I get more attention (therefore DATES and *SEX*) when 
>I'm dressed up, have on sexy attire, perfume, and some extra red tint to my
>hair.  So, maybe it's guys that are fucked up here, if they're the ones that 
>*respond* to this behavior I'm exhibiting.  Do any of you guys think women put
>on make-up and high heels and noxious-smeling chemicals on our hair because
>it's enjoyable or pleasant? HA! Nope, it's because your buddies out there seem
>to appreciate the effort.
>
>>
>>Most women don't need it, and IMHO many look an awful lot better
>>without it.
>
>I'm so happy you think so, but at least where I live (not where it says above
>either, and I won't say as to avoid biasing my previous post) most guys don't
>feel the same way, they want a woman who LOOKS GOOD, and I frankly want a guy
>who looks damn good himself, so to find each other maybe we need that little
>extra help...after that, if he can tolerate the way I look dripping wet after
>a shower, then we're meant for each other.
>
>Terra

>
>Finally a REAL woman of the world...!!!!! Terra has said it all. I agree
>with what she says....
>
>just me...billy

Newsgroups: soc.singles