HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden)
Subject: Re: MISC: I'm bored - gimme something to read
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 09:11:57 EST

jrd@frame.com (James Drew) writes:

> Elizabeth Holden (panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca) writes:
> >- The Hacker Files
> >  Also clever, with subtle characterization and good plots.  There was a 
> >twist in the latest issue that delighted me, and I never saw it coming.
> 
> And with the *worst* art this side of the cash-in-on-the-Turtles-boom/bust.
> Sutton and Buckingham should be ashamed of their work on this series; after
> #4's "zombie generals of the Pentagon" (Eiling, especially, looked dead), I
> couldn't justify spending another dime on the title.

You read for the art, do you?  I find that truly *good* writing on a 
comic is so rare that I will enjoy a badly-drawn comic (if I know the 
writing is good) in a way that I will not enjoy a beautifully drawn but 
badly written comic.

In the case of HACKER FILES, the writing is so good that I will happily 
accept the poor art.  It isn't the worst in comics today, it just isn't 
good.  I can pretend it's suitable to our shabby anarchistic hero here.

Namaste,
Elizabeth


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: solovay@netcom.com (Andrew Solovay)
Subject: Re: SANDMAN:Lucien's Library
Summary: What, are there other Avengers?
Organization: People's Front of Judea
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:39:35 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.160814.29280@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF) writes:
>In article <8248@news.duke.edu> eja@carr3.acpub.duke.edu (Eric Akawie) writes:
>>
>>What books do YOU want to read out of Lucien's Library.  Let's assume
>>he's got a comic book section and an AV department too.
>>
>
>JLA vs. the Avengers.

No contest. Mrs. Peel could handle all those clowns by herself,
let alone with her partner.

But it might be worth reading...
-- 
Andrew Solovay    

"I is not now, nor has I ever been, a Human Bein'!"
                ---Pogo Possum
From: mas@csa.bu.edu (Mark A. Semich)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Blue Witch of Oz is here (SPOILERS)
Date: 30 Dec 92 03:17:34 GMT
Organization: The Internet


I just got my backordered copy of _The_Blue_Witch_of_Oz_ in the mail
today from Books of Wonder.

SPOILER!

(This spoiler will spoil the VERY END of the book... consider yourself
warned)



The story doesn't end in this book!  Does anybody know if/when Eric
Shanower is planning to do the sequel?

--
===========================================================================
      "Fashions so hot, our store burned down."       -- Allston Beat
--   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   --
mark a. semich                                               mas@csa.bu.edu
===========================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
Subject: Re: superheroes yet to be
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 20:28:04 GMT

In article <1i4t36INN9et@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> ajd@oit.itd.umich.edu (Arthur Delano) writes:
>
>Cute Boy Death


	Out of the sky,
		It's a bird
NO!
		It's a plane
NO!
		It's ... It's...

	
	Mr. Lollipop!

	By day a mild-mannered "harmless" man of the cloth,
	but by night (or even on cloudy days) a vile terror to young children 
	everywhere!

	CAN THE WORLD BE SAVED??

	Catch the first exciting issue at newstands everywhere Feb 1, 1993!

	#1: "Hey, this doesn't taste like a lollipop!"

<future issues>:

	#2:  "The Spitting Pink Cobra"
	#3:  "Candlesticks of pain"
	#4:  "Unholy Church"

	Each issue at the BARGAIN PRICE of $5.00

	<mail me cash, in a sase>

-- 
	Blaming "society" for your problems is like blaming clouds for rain.
         ---  boycott == censorship == closed mindedness == cowardice  ---
	      "Psalms 23:1  The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want."  
		Shepherds are for sheep.   -----      Pain teaches.
From: balbes@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Why does PAD *stay* on the net?
Date: 21 Dec 92 16:17:13 EST
Organization: The Ohio State University, Department of Physics

In article <1992Dec21.183744.21960@pbhyc.PacBell.COM>, djdaneh@pbhyc.PacBell.COM (Dan'l DanehyOakes) writes:
> Where I think you most need to concentrate in the next year or so is in --
> God help us -- _plot_.  I need to add quickly that I'm hypersensitive to plot
> issues, because I realize that it's my _own_ weakest area, so you can take this
> with whatever size salt crystal best suits your taste.  
 [stuff deleted] 
> But the large scale stuff... well, here's what I mean.  Somewhere around three
> years ago, I found myself saying to the only other comic reader I see in person
> regularly "He's going to 'cure' the Hulk.  Somebody, and it's probably Doc 
> Samson, is going to psychoanalyze him in exactly one issue, and integrate the
> personalities."

I have to make a comment here about predicting things.  Often
when my wife and I watch a TV show together, I will mention my
surprise, astonishment, etc. over a particular plot turn.  She
will turn to me and tell me in all seriousness that it was obvious
and how could I not have seen it coming.  She never tells me in
advance what's going to happen, only chastising me after the fact
and telling me she knew awhile ago that this particular turn of
events is going to happen.

Now, I have no doubt that what you have said above is true.  I also
have to wonder how many other scenarios you have stated as "going
to happen".  There are only so many directions a story can go
in once it's been set up, and if you spout them all in some
general fashion then later you can say you predicted what was
going to happen.  This is how the psychics make their money.

I am by no means flaming you.  I think everyone does this, including
me.  

Another point.  Even if you know where the roller coaster is 
going to end up, the ride is still fun.

If I was going make critisize PAD for something it would be in
trying to be too cute sometimes with his references to other things.
Most of the time it works, but sometimes he tries to hard.

Mark Balbes
not sucking up to PAD
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: tyg@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Tom Galloway)
Subject: Re: Question about LSH #40
Organization: Interleaf
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 00:23:26 GMT

In article <1qiLwB13w165w@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca> panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden) writes:
>Have we ever seen Squire before?  Who is he?  And who is the 

To make matters even worse, it was established back in the Secrets of the
LSH mini-series (same one that revealed that Cham was Brande's kid) that
Drake Burroughs was adopted with no known blood relatives.

"Sun Boy gave me a flying belt as consolation for not making the team. It's the
Legion of Super-Heroes home game, that's what it is!" --Polar Boy
tyg   tyg@hq.ileaf.com
From: silver@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Nina Karp)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Desert Peach, Mu and other funness..
Date: 25 Dec 92 20:12:33 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu

In article <B981VB10w165w@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca> panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden) writes:
>silver@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Nina Karp) writes:
>
>> Anyone catch the Mu Christmas compilation?  Cute li'l heart-warmin' Desert
>> Peach story...
>
>Oh yes, oh yes!  Wasn't this delightful?
>
>> 
>> Mu's got a new title out as of Friday, which I will shamelessly plug 'cause
>> it's done by a friend of mine... _Critturs, Hairballs from Hell_.  It's
>
>Uh... what's it about?  I appreciate the recommendation, but the 
>*title*.... it sounds like Clive Barker does funny animals for EC....
>

Hmm... what's it about?  check out the last page of the Mu Christmas comp; it's
got a Critturs page.  It's... different.  Very sick and twisted; Critturs are
these cute fuzzy little creatures who inflict horrible tortures on each other,
and have horrible tortures inflicted on them by the artist, who is a devout
Discordian.

If you like Milk & Cheese-ish types of things, you'd probably like Critturs.
I don't know what my favorite bits are, but it's either the martial-arts film
('Frying Fists of Furry') or a profound little bit called 'Everybody's Fucking
Except You.'

Hee hee...

Nina.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz)
Subject: Re: MISC: Favorite Writers
Reply-To: ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz)
Organization: Me, Myself, and I
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:59:50 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.221739.15835@cs.unca.edu> mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner) writes:
>Rob is not a bad *PLOTTER* -- the *concept* of Supreme, for example,
>is very good.
>
>He needs a good dialogue person, or a panel-by-panel writer, to carry
>out these ideas.

Have you read the New Mutants and X-Force issues that he worked on? I felt
that most of his plots were designed so that he could draw fight scenes galore
without using much story. Many of the ideas that he put into NM/XF completely
destroyed the original concept that Claremont created. Instead of stories about
a group of teenagers who happened to have mutant powers, I saw stories about
mutant powers that happened to have teenagers behind them. When was the last 
time that any of the characters was seen in a normal setting? I fondly remember
issues like New Mutants #7, #22, and #42 where we got to see the actual 
_people_ who comprised the New Mutants. Nowadays, all I see is a group of 
kids going around attacking first adn asking questions later. Does anyone 
remember the last time the kids went to a mall?

---


Eric Jaron Stieglitz aka ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
"With great power comes great responsibility"
We have been given the power of free speech.
Let's make sure that we use it wisely... 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: jcowling@ophelia.UVic.CA (Scowling Jim Cowling)
Subject: Re:  Indie Distribution Discounts 
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 92 19:39:49 GMT

In article <zardoz.021p@sycom.mi.org> zardoz@sycom.mi.org (David Lillard) writes:
>As a small-press Comics & SF Publisher, ex-Shop Owner/Manager, etc., etc. 

[drivel deleted]

Y'all can safely ignore Dave's post as yet another example of him misinforming
and misleading the net.population.

Publishers set the price (typically).  At least they do with the Big Two
Distributors (Capital and Diamond).  And as these two account for 80% of the
international distribution level, that's "most".

Do you honestly think that if a self-publisher says "Hi, I'll give yo a 60%
discount" the distributors will say "No."?  Spare me.  The latest orderbook
lists a small-press book with an "A" discount (the same as Marvel and DC).  It's
safe to say that the book is a 4000 copy or less run.  If they can do it,
then anyone can do it.  Period and full stop.

Blame it on the publishers.

-------
Scowling Jim Cowling
Professional Evil Person
Creative Writing Department, University of Victoria (opinions disassociated)
Don't bother complaining.  My sysadmin encourages me and I've got a dozen
other accounts to play with.
-------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden)
Subject: Re: Favorite Writers
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 07:38:21 EST

kens@psc.lsa.umich.edu (Ken Small) writes:

> 
> I don't find Sandman all that good either.  While I disagree with
> the first-20-good/rest-are-drek observation, I do find Sandman to 
> be a 50/50 proposal.  Half the time it's good, half the time it's

Really?  Interesting.  I find the odds better than that; even when the 
plot sags, there is enough interesting matter in references, character, 
and though-provoking juxtaposition of ideas for me to feel it's still a 
good read.

> drek.  Gaiman would to better to stick to self-contained stories
> such as the ones between arcs; the "sustained mythology" is nice,

I agree absolutely that his best stories are the one-issue ones, with the 
possible exception of "Season of Mists".

> but unless the characters actually change (and they haven't) then it's
> just another excercise in continuity, which is ultimately self-
> defeating.
> 

I think they have changed.... thematically if not in character.  We've 
seen different sides of them and this is more change than you get in 99% 
of the other comics around.  (Except for the lost the power/ get them 
back, die/recover, etc., that many comics do that isn't really change at 
all.)

Namaste,
Elizabeth


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: tyg@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Tom Galloway)
Subject: Re: REVIEWS:  PAD week (Hulk and X-Factor, SPOILERS)
Organization: Interleaf
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 21:11:36 GMT

In article <1992Dec23.192307.9396@news.columbia.edu> ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz) writes:
>Is Shana your wife, daughter, or some other relation?
>Also, who is "Myra David," who suggested the "Rahne's World" gag a couple 
>issues back?

Shana is a lobster. She's also been writing But I Digress for the last
year of so.

Myra is a goat horned alien who had the hots for Sulu and wanted to
do something nasty to Kathy Li.

I hope this clears things up.

"When anyone says `theoretically,' they really mean `not really.'"  --David
Parnas 
tyg   tyg@hq.ileaf.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: cwelsh@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Craig Welsh  )
Subject: Re: ANOTHER $#%^&#%-ING SPIDERMAN TITLE!?!?!?!?![D
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 21:21:07 GMT

>>Accd to Previews, we will be assaulted with another regular Spidey title.  I 
>>think I shall go over into the corner and sob quietly for a while.
>>     Dave Van Domelen, whimper....
>
>	I presume you mean Spider-Man Unlimited.  I think this is going
>to be a quarterly title.  I know FF Unlimited is.  There's also going to
>be a 2099 Unltd.  Does anyone know the deal with these Unltd. things?

The deal is that Marvel is gouging Spider-Man for everything he is
worth.  I think there is a saturation point for comic bokk characters
and Spidey is at that point.  I mean do we really need TWO Spidey
reprint books.  Oh you didn't know that. On top of Marvel Tales there
will now be Spider-Man Classics, reprinting Amazing Fantasy 15 in it's
first issue.

Methinks this is all getting a tad ridiculous.  Time to start canning a
few of them.

-Craig

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  Stupid Things that you don't want to find on your child's Report  >
>  Card                                                              >
>  #10. Tasty.                                                       >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: cwelsh@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Craig Welsh  )
Subject: Re: SANDMAN:Lucien's Library
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 21:16:42 GMT

This is probaby more for my friend at the comic book store that I go to,
but they would personally kill to read the follow up storyline to "Body
and Soul" in the Helfer and Baker _Shadow_ series.  That was the one
that preceeded the _Shadow Sucks_ ....I mean _Shadow Strikes_ sereies.
Dc promised to print the follow up storyline in a GN, but never did.
The cliff hanger at the end of that series really gets to them. I think
they still hate DC to this day.

Personally, I wouldn't have mind see Claremont's revised X-Men with John
Byrne doing the pencils.  That'd be nice.

-Craig
   
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
< Stupid Things to say when your child asks "Daddy, what did you do    <
< during the war?"                                                     <
< #4. Napalmed an entire village. It was bloody brilliant.             <
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: gatsby@wam.umd.edu (Ravindra Pillalamarri)
Subject: Re: Top Ten DC Slogans
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 18:41:08 GMT

	How about:

DC : Corporate Comics at indie prices!

	(Sandman Mystery Theatre, Enigma, Death : HCOL...)

Rav
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons)
Subject: Re: Annotated Stanley & His Monster #1
Organization: Industrial Technology Institute
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 14:48:30 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.230929.2057@netcom.com> solovay@netcom.com (Andrew Solovay) writes:

>Re. p. 10, panel 5: Anyone remember what Power Girl's cat's name
>is?

She ought to name it `Guy'.
-- 
	"You can't get here from here."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee)
Subject: Re: Sandman - A Thought
Organization: Johns Hopkins University CS Dept.
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 21:40:39 GMT

In article <0F8DwB3w165w@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca> panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden) writes:
>> Sandman, basically, works only if you ignore the existence of other planets
>> except for a few references like the Martian Manhunter one, and ignore the
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> existence of most other cultures on Earth.
>
>Huh?  No, I still gon't get it.  We've seen the Endless interacting on 
>other planets (rarely, but we've seen it).

Yes, I know, see marked section above.

>I don't see your point: the 
>more destruction we see, the more the likelihood that Destruction was 
>around because he was needed.

I was referring to the concept that seeing a lot of destruction is explained
by the _absence_ of Destruction (since destruction is still here, but not
controlled).  Specifically that we have world wars and such because Destruction
is not around to supervise.

This concept doesn't work because other planets have had wars of similar
destructiveness before Destruction quit his job.
--
"the bogosity in a field equals the bogosity imported from related areas, plus
the bogosity generated internally, minus the bogosity expelled or otherwise
disposed of."  -- K. Eric Drexler

Ken Arromdee (arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu, arromdee@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu)
Organization: The Pennylvania State University
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 10:27:49 EST
From: Ernie Oporto <EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: How does PAD write scripts for Marvel?

Well, while I'd like to see PAD's answer to this myself, I think I
am qualified to say that what you describe is very formulaeic.
Doing that sort of thing over and over is by no means true story
telling.  Sure, some writers can only write so many different stories
before they find themselves repeating and thus being burnt out.  What
I see PAD doing, is writing stories.  The last issue had a theme to it,
but it wasn't a formula driven comic (1 part set-up, 2 parts chase
scene, 17 parts fight).  You get a story idea, and present it.
A story is advanced by events and characterization.  The last X-Factor
issue was all characterization, which did give us more insight into
our heroes.  Fight scenes aren't really story advancement.  The dialogue
you see in them is to stories as what Liefeld's hatchmarks are to his
backgrounds; a distraction.  In this case, a picture of the punch
is worth 1/1000 of a word.

Actually, PAD, if you did use a formula, I'd like to see it.  =)
Then I could use it to crank out my own stories.  Lord knows I
could use a dialogue-spicer.  (Dave Henry might attest to that =) )
---
"YOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!"  --  Ren
  _____)           ______        _)       _)  EAO102@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
                               __       __    OPORTO@CORVETTE.ECE.PSU.EDU
______    ______            ___      ___      Ernie "SHOKK" Oporto
                               __       __    Computer Lab Attendant
(_______ _      _ ________ _     _) _     _)  for PSU's CAC Department
From: cje@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Cthulhu's Jersey Epopt)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Why is PAD on the net?
Date: 22 Dec 92 20:17:02 GMT
Organization: Miskatonic U. Computer Operations & User Services

Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com writes:

>I once had a few fellow pros over at my house, and I mentioned Usenet to
>them.  They were interested in seeing it.  So I logged on and ...
>The threads were, almost uniformly, vicious, sniping, mean-spirited and
>arrogant.  Oddly enough, no one in that group was interested in opening up 
>their own account.

The question that comes to my mind is, if the Usenet is so bad, why does Peter
continue to pay for access?

That's a serious question, Peter.  My assumption is that, through repeated
exposure, you've learned it *does* have some value (emphasis on "some"),
whereas your fellow pros were so turned off by their initial exposure, they
weren't interested in further doses.

Surely GEnie and CompuServe are not devoid of dolts.  Surely these same pros
saw their work bad-mouthed over there, too.  So what's the appeal of CompuServe
over Usenet?  Just cheaper?  More accessable?  

Or is it easier to ignore bad-mouthing when it comes from adolescent dolts but
not when it comes from college-age-and-up dolts?

So why did Peter David return to the Usenet when others didn't?


-- 
Yog-Sothoth Neblod Zin,

Chris Jarocha-Ernst			Rutgers University Computing Services
Internet: cje@gandalf.rutgers.edu       BITnet: JAROCHAERNST@ZODIAC
From: houchin@sunshine.Kodak.COM (Scott Houchin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Color me Dark & Streets
Keywords: Streets and dark
Date: 30 Dec 92 14:40:49 GMT
Organization: Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY

In article <trumpet-user.16@oregon.uoregon.edu> trumpet-user@oregon.uoregon.edu (Default Trumpet User) writes:
>Has any one seen the DC Hardcover "Color Me Dark" (I think that's the title
>) or the miniseries Streets (prestige format) yet.  Both were announced in
>Direct Currents a couple of months ago.
>
The title was _Tell_Me_Dark_, and it came out about a month ago. I thought
it was worth the money.
From: arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Valiant Issues
Date: 2 Jan 93 03:17:57 GMT
Organization: Johns Hopkins University CS Dept.

In article <31DEC199218402001@udel.edu> jdelisle@udel.edu (J. G. Delisle) writes:
>	I don't know that I like the TPB idea. Yeah, they're great for folks 
>who don't have those issues, but they knock the price down on existing issues.
>After all, once the 2nd print of Solar #10 came out, the first print wasn't 
>quite as hot anymore. (I know, I'm being selfish...)

Hey, I like having original issues.  You get letter columns, original covers,
and a warm fuzzy feeling of "way back in 1991, people were standing in the
store and seeing a Solar comic for the first time in decades".

But I don't $100-worth-of-like those original issues.  Nor do I think any
non-speculator does.  All the speculators have done is ruin the market for
those who actually want the issues as issues instead of as potential
investments.

Go ahead, ruin the investments.  I bought Solar from the beginning, and it's
nice knowing my #10 is selling for absurd amounts, but it'd be _nicer_
knowing that if I decide to get another Valiant comic I can buy back issues
without going bankrupt.

(Post-silver-age seems to be almost as bad.  I just found out that early
Tomb of Dracula has skyrocketed.  Sheesh.)
--
"On the first day after Christmas my truelove served to me...  Leftover Turkey!
On the second day after Christmas my truelove served to me...  Turkey Casserole
    that she made from Leftover Turkey.
[days 3-4 deleted] ...  Flaming Turkey Wings! ...
   -- Pizza Hut commercial (and M*tlu/A*gic bait)

Ken Arromdee (arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu, arromdee@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu)
From: panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden)
Subject: Re: LSH #40, Squires and pages....
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 93 09:55:18 EST

tyg@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Tom Galloway) writes:

> According to the blurb in the latest Previews, the green dude is the Martian
> Manhunter. It would explain why he was at Chuck and Luronu's wedding back
> in Superboy and the Legion #200.
> 

Thank you, Tom. 

I like this, I like this, I like this.

Namaste,
Elizabeth