HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pascal@CAM.ORG (Pascal Gosselin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: Slow AppleShare 3.0
Date: 20 Dec 92 05:29:11 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada

pharmacy@epx.cis.umn.edu (Patrick Parker) writes:

>In article <1992Dec18.184303.4743@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
>hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Hades) writes:
>>
>>
>>    My office used to run AppleShare 2.0 on an SE/30 and it was fairly
>>responsive for LocalTalk. Recently we have upgraded to a Quadra 700 and
>>AppleShare 3.0, and now server access is about half of what it was
>>before. Has anybody else seen this? Is there something simple I'm
>>missing in the configuration of the server? Any help would be most
>>appreciated...

I was told by one of our customers at work that 'Apple knew about the
Quadra & AppleShare performance problem'.  Probably under non-disclosure,
they were shown the upcoming 'Server' from Apple (it crashed a few times).

Case in point, upgrading their 100% IIci network to Quads (700 for the
workstations, 950 for the server) SLOWED THINGS DOWN. Incredible.
Maybe they are flushing the '040 caches too often, who knows!

-Pascal 
-- 
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+
    Pascal Gosselin        |     Communications Accessibles Montreal  
    pascal@CAM.ORG         |  A non-profit corporation.  Newsfeeds & More.   
  Apple Support Specialist |  For info: info@CAM.ORG or Voice (514) 923-2102 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: Bob Polis <bobp@cc.mey.nl>
Subject: Re: Anybody upgraded to MacX 1.2?
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d13
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:42:57 GMT
X-Xxdate: Tue, 15 Dec 92 15:43:21 GMT
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A753AD991C0302DA@mt1-218.srv.ca.mey.nl>
Organization: Moret Ernst & Young

In article <1992Dec14.131906.12979@doug.cae.wisc.edu> Brian E. Saunders,
saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu writes:
>I would like to know if anybody has upgraded to MacX 1.2 from MacX 1.1.7.
>I do not plan on upgrading to System 7.1, so I don't need the MacX
upgrade,
>but I would like to know if any users think that there are any
improvements/
>bug fixes which might make the upgrade worthwhile.

We did upgrade from 1.1.7 to 1.2. Most of the enhancements seem to be
underneath the surface; the most obvious improvement is the support for
color/grayscale monitors. All the graphic elements look *so much* better
when viewed even in gray!
If you use black & white and you don't use System 7.1, you probably don't
miss much if you don't upgrade (as far as I can see). If you do use
grayscale or color monitors, you'd better upgrade!

---------------------------------------------------------
Bob Polis
Moret Ernst & Young
G.H. Betzweg 1                  Voice: (31) (0)10-4074256
3068 AZ  Rotterdam               Fax.: (31) (0)10-4556774
The Netherlands              Internet: bobp@cc.mey.nl
---------------------------------------------------------
From: chuck@nimbus.drexel.edu (Wombozni Klik)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: No 14.4K seeting on ZTerm?
Date: 14 Dec 92 18:58:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: nimbus.CHUCK.92Dec14135846
Organization: Drexel University Department of Physics
X-Posted-From: nimbus.physics.drexel.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu


I just set my modem to 38400 and don't worry about it. I just got a
14.4 modem last month, and realized the same problem, but (I think)
the zterm manual says to use 38400, (or maybe it was the modem
manual?) 

Anyway, I connect fine at 14.4 with any other v32bis modem... 

Chuck
--
Chuck Browne                            | Frisbeetarianism: The belief that  
Drexel University Department of Physics | when you die, your soul goes up
chuck@nimbus.physics.drexel.edu         | on the roof and gets stuck.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: leonardr@netcom.com (Leonard Rosenthol)
Subject: Re: BinHexing in the IBM world
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 17:54:05 GMT

In article <85235@ut-emx.uucp> ifby661@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Adam) writes:
>I would like to know if there are any programs on the IBM/Dos word that
>are capable of BinHexing?? I would preffer a Shareware/Freeware program,
>BUT a commercial program will work.
>
	Check out a program called (oddly enough) binhex.exe, which is a PC
based binhexer.  You should be able to find it on the standard PC archives
sites, especially garbo.uwasa.fi.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol			Internet: 	leonardr@netcom.com
Director of Advanced Technology		AppleLink:	MACgician
Aladdin Systems, Inc.			GEnie:		MACgician

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: rhall@next02.cc.umanitoba.ca. (Roger Hall)
Subject: How to change .bin to .hqx?
Keywords: HELP!!!
Reply-To: rhall@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:34:44 GMT

Hi there,

	I would like to know how to change a .bin file to a .hqx file.   
The syntax of the 'mcvert' has recently changed to mcvert [ -[r|d|u|x|h]  
[D|U] [p|q] [s|v] ] filename...  I have try all combinations but still not  
working.  I also have tried the 'MacBinary' application, but the resulted  
file is corrupted???!!!

	Can somebody help me?

	email to me if possible.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry no sig.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Distribution: world
From: jimh@laison.w8hd.org (Jim Hebert)
Organization: L'AISON - Local Area Information Server Open Network
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 12:56:12 EDT
Subject: Re: VersaTerm

Jeremy Fox,cq267@cleveland.Freenet.Edu, asks about VersaTerm:
 
  > What is the difference between the Pro and 
  > the regular version?                          
 
VersaTerm-Pro adds some terminal emulations not included in the cheaper
package. 
 
  > How does it compare in speed, ease-of-use, 
  > and features with other communications 
  > packages, specifically ZTerm

VersaTerm is an interesting package. It uses the CTB for connections
(optionally). It uses its own resources for Terminal emulation. It contains a
number of file tranfer protocols on its own  (X-,Y-modem, Kermit), and can use
CTB resources for file transfers. It does not have a z-modem protocol
built-in,  but could use a z-modem tool from the CTB. ( Note, it will *not*
work with the Pacer z-modem tool, but according to Synergy it *will* work with
the Seaquest z-modem tool. Also note that the Pacer tool *does* work with
several other CTB apps.)

VersaTerm SLIP is included in the cheaper package; it works very well!  You
can use it to provide TCP/IP connections for other applications. Also included
are FTP client and server apps. MacTCP is provided as well (at least it was
with my copy). 
 
You get your money's worth! 
 
The software works well; the documentation is messy. Currently you'll get four different volumes of documentation.  Parts of some are superceded by others, etc. You need to refer back
and forth between them to get going. Synergy is working on revising their docs
.

Support has been great. You can call and talk to very knowledgeable people
without waiting in long cues. They can send upgrades via e-mail!  
 
If you just want asynch-modem dial up and z-modem transfers, you may find
something better, but if you want tcp/ip, SLIP, ftp, etc., VersaTerm is a
great deal!

jim


_____________________________________________________________________________
Jim Hebert                L'AISON = Local Area Information Server Open Network    
jimh@laison.w8hd.org                Tel: 313/647-2634  Beverly Hills, Michigan
______________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Subject: Anybody upgraded to MacX 1.2?
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison
Date: 14 Dec 92 13:19:06 CST

I would like to know if anybody has upgraded to MacX 1.2 from MacX 1.1.7.
I do not plan on upgrading to System 7.1, so I don't need the MacX upgrade,
but I would like to know if any users think that there are any improvements/
bug fixes which might make the upgrade worthwhile.
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: tj@kona.cs.ucla.edu (Tom Johnson)
Subject: Logicode (Quicktel Xeba) Phone or PS Spec needed
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 22:16:09 GMT

I've been given a Logicode Technologies' Quicktel Xeba 9624 fax/modem,
without a power supply.  There is no indication of the specs required, and
I can't find their phone number.

Can someone either help me out with a phone number for Logicode's tech
support department, or with the specs for the wall-wart power supply?

Thanks-
  Tom
-- 
Tom Johnson             "They say Confucious does his crossword with a pen."
tj@cs.ucla.edu                               -Tori Amos
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: weverka@csn.org (Robert T. Weverka)
Subject: Re: MacTCP (re: not included in system)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:40:07 GMT

In <haase-181292081351@mac_dialin1.meediv.lanl.gov> (Peter Haase) writes:
>In <1CE00001.lagpra@tbomb.ice.com>, (Tim Endres) wrote:
>>In<1992Dec16.093457.13871@alijku05.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at>Norbert Mueller writes:
>> > If Macs with Ethernet hardware are delivered without MacTCP this
>> > is like selling a car without a steering wheel.
>> > Apple seriously should reconsider its MacTCP policy !!!!
>> This is an absolute stupidity!
>> I have had more than a few customers of new Quadras call
>> and ask why they have setup their Mac and can not use NCSA
>> telnet to get to the A/UX machine.
>> When I explain that they are missing software that drives TCP,
>> they literally hit the ceiling. One sent the machine back!
>> Apple - wake up!
>> 
>> Do you think GM would let you order a Cadillac without air conditioning?
>> No. It is standard.
>> 
>What....You get EtherTalk standard....maybe it's not a Cadillac....
>it's an Oldsmobile and Air Conditioning is a Pay For option.....
>

I bought a Quadra with "plug and play" ethernet.  Unfortunately
I had to spend another $100 for an external plug converter.

-Ted

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: Frank Price <wprice@pomona.claremont.edu>
Subject: Re: Hermes Backdoor
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A751066D990106BA@jupiter.claremont.edu>
X-Xxdate: Sun, 13 Dec 92 15:25:33 GMT
Organization: Pomona College
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d13
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:25:34 GMT

Well, if my newsreader hadn't shot itself in the foot, I would have had
my reply to this nonsense out days ago.  Nevertheless, I think it is
clear to any reasonable person that this is something that has been
invented expressly for the purpose of smearing and has no relation to the
truth.  There is not now and never has there ever been any truth or even
remote similarity to the truth in this fable about a backdoor.  This
thing came out WEEKS ago on the support BBS, and everybody immediately
tried it and realized the guy was full of it.  To think that a few people
would actually believe this kind of thing is really incredible.  Hermes
has never had a backdoor, and it never will.

-- Frank
_______________________________________________________________
Frank Price              |  wprice@pomona.claremont.edu
                         |  "Nothing crashes like a Macintosh."
                         |       - Guy Kawasaki
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: thingles@xerxes.cs.umn.edu (Jamie Thingelstad)
Subject: Re: ARA and Supra
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:54:07 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.050941.23386@ncsu.edu> sdtrent.mte.ncsu.edu writes:
> Has anyone had much luck connecting Supra v.32bis modems using ARA? I have
>been trying without luck. I was able to connect them at 4800 (Supra-Supra). But
>I have not be able to go higher. I was unable to connect a Zoom v.32bis to the
[much deleted...]
>if I can find one that is more reliable on ARA. (like I said, it works fine
>dialing in at 12,000 baud.

I administer a network that uses ARA dial-in access. The ARA server machine
has a Supra v.32bis on it (ROM Revision i) and I dial in all the time
with my PowerBook 170 with a PowerPort/Gold modem. I have never had
any problems connecting at 14.4 on both ends. Once in an odd while, the
modems will connect but ARA will be unhappy and I have to reconnect,
but thats ARA's fault, not the modem.

Somebody told me that Supra seems to have a 1-in-2 success rate. In other
words, 50% of the modems work great, the other 50%, good luck. Maybe
return it for another. All I can say is that I have had NO problems
with this setup.

--
--

   _/_/_/_/ _/_/   _/  _/ _/ _/_/_/   Jamie Thingelstad               624-4037
      _/   _/  _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/      Technology Coordinator
From: ken@Cayman.COM (Ken Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: ARA and data compression
Date: 16 Dec 92 23:45:42 GMT
	<1992Dec08.014323.24162@news.mentorg.com> <1fqeetINNs2j@calvin.NYU.EDU>
	<1992Dec14.074512.10467@gallant.apple.com>
Organization: Cayman Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA
In-reply-to: mikew@apple.com's message of 14 Dec 92 07:45:12 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.074512.10467@gallant.apple.com> mikew@apple.com (Mike Wiese) writes:
From: Raoul Schaffner <raoul@inf.eawag.ch>
Subject: MacX 1.1.7 and Sun OpenLook Problem
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A7562B0C55020164@test.emp-eaw.ch>
X-Xxdate: Thu, 17 Dec 92 13:03:08 GMT
Organization: EAWAG
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d14
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 12:08:25 GMT

I installed MacX 1.1.7 to use my Quadra 700 as XWindow Server for various
XWindow Applications running on our Sun SparcServer. However, as far as the
window manager is concerned, I was not able to load the OpenLook Window
Manager
Version 3. The error message is something like: "unable to load, is there
another window manager running?".

I had to go back to Version 2, which is running quite well, besides the
fact that cmdtool and shelltool do not work. They both don't seem to get
the
right connection to the host, i.e. I get no prompt and no response from
commands. When I want to work with cmdtool, I have to start a terminal
emulator
(Mac340) and issue the command "cmdtool -display <mac.ip.addr>:0.3" to
redirect
the cmdtool input/output to the Window Manager on my Mac.

So here are my three questions:

1. Has anybody else experienced these problems with cmdtool and shelltool?
2. Has anybody managed to run OLWM 3 on MacX 1.1.7?
3. Has anybody successfully launched cmdtool from within MacX instead of
   from the terminal emulator as described above?

Thanks in advance,
Raoul

************************************************************************
* Raoul Schaffner                       *  E-Mail: raoul@inf.eawag.ch  *
* Swiss Federal Institute for Water     *                              *
* Resources And Water Pollution Control *  Phone:  +41-1-823-5511      *
* Computer Science Dept.                *  Fax:    +41-1-823-5028      *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: lamont@rtsg.mot.com (Bradley Lamont)
Subject: Re: ARA and data compression (and error correction)
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:08:50 GMT

To me, the entire disabling of the error correction of the modems is
a major fault of ARA.

For example:
I was copying a file (about 2-3 MB) over ARA.  After it was about 90% completed
lightning struck nearby and blew the connection.  Since error control
was disabled, the connection died.  At least with error correction, it might
have recovered.

This is another fault of ARA - no partial transfers - after 45 min of
copying, it lost everything.

(BTW I know I shouldn't use a modem during a storm but since I was copying
for over 45 min, I didn't know the storm was coming :-( ).

Brad
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley H. Lamont                email:  lamont@rtsg.mot.com
Motorola, Inc.                           lamont@sumter.cso.uiuc.edu
Wireless Enterprise Systems
From: Jim.Matthews@dartmouth.edu (Jim Matthews)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: Problem with Fetch 2.1? (cannot fpt with name address)
Date: 16 Dec 92 14:32:48 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

Roy Smith writes
> Why can't Fetch just try each address in turn?

There's a practical problem in the layout of my code, in that the code  
that turns names into addresses is somewhat removed from the code that  
waits for a connection to come through.  But the real problem is that I  
don't know how long to wait before giving up on an address; timeouts for  
this sort of thing are almost always too long, except when they're too  
short :-).

Jim Matthews
Dartmouth Software Development
From: phillips@utxvm.cc.utexas.edu (Sue Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: No 14.4K seeting on ZTerm?
Date: 17 Dec 92 23:40:05 GMT
Organization: University of Texas at Austin
X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
X-XXMessage-ID: <A7566C16EA01B9B0@slip-x76.ots.utexas.edu>
X-XXDate: Thu, 17 Dec 92 17:40:38 GMT

Subject: No 14.4K seeting on ZTerm?
From: Eric Lorenzo, lorenzo@spot.Colorado.EDU
Date: 14 Dec 92 06:51:19 GMT
In article <1992Dec14.065119.29953@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> Eric Lorenzo,
lorenzo@spot.Colorado.EDU writes:
>I'm using ZTerm v0.9 currently with my 9600 baud connection.  I am
planning
>to get a 14.4K modem, but ZTerm doesn't have a setting for 14.4K.  ZTerm
is
>a great program and I'd hate to have to stop using it.  Are there any
other
>similar programs to ZTerm that accept 14.4K baud?

 Zterm Dose not have a 14k setting but it still works, you set it to the
highest speed setting and it works just fine. I use a SupraFaxModem 14k
and it works for me...
From: bcoleman@hayes.com (Bill Coleman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: Smartcom II offer ?
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:32:31 EDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA

In article <1992Dec14.170029.77993@fourd.com>, Jim_Johns@fourd.com writes:
> I interested in seeing if the Smartcom II competitive upgrade offer is a good
> deal

I hope no one will flame me for responding, even though you might think I have
an obvious bias, as one of the authors of the application in question.

> I am looking for a new inexpensive communication program.  

I think that Smartcom II can fulfill that role admirably.

> Two low cost alternatives present themselves at this time.  Personal
> Microphone, which is new and available at MacConnection for $36.  It keeps the
> scripting language from Microphone II, but alas does not support Z-Modem.  So
> that's out.

If Personal Microphone is out, doesn't that leave you with one alternative?

> Hayes has a competitive upgrade offer available on Smartcom II until the end
> of the year which is $44 at MacConnection.  I qualify for this with
> MacKnowledge which came with my modem.  

I don't know the details of the upgrade, but I believe you do, indeed, 
qualify.

> I know that MacUser loves Smartcom II 

Steve Bobker (late of MacUser) and Robert Wiggins love Smartcom II. They
are both long-time fans of this product. That's why you see good press
on Smartcom II in MacUser.

> and most BBS people seem to prefer White Knight (or Microphone if they're rich
> and/or fanatical).  
> My question is:  is there anything wrong with Smartcom? 

No. There's nothing "wrong" with it at all. Smartcom has certain strengths,
as do these other products.

> Would it be a better deal than WK if you can get it at half the price?  

That depends on what you want. If you want loads of features, lots of
crowded dialogs, a powerful but cryptic scripting language and mediocre
performance -- you should get WK. (I'm being quite serious here, not
sarcastic)

If want basic functionality (like ZM without a ton of options), a simpler
clean interface, an easier albeit less powerful scripting language and
excellent performance -- you should get Smartcom II.

Even at full price, I'd prefer Smartcom II over WK. At half price,
it is a steal.

Despite my employer, I can't help but warn you of my obvious bias. I've
spent several years working on Smartcom II. I think it is a good product.

-- 
Bill Coleman, AA4LR                ! CIS: 76067,2327    AppleLink: D1958
Principal Software Engineer        ! Packet Radio: AA4LR @ W4QO
Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc. ! UUCP: uunet!hayes!bcoleman
POB 105203 Atlanta, GA 30348 USA   ! Internet: bcoleman%hayes@uunet.uu.net
Disclaimer: "My employer doesn't pay me to have opinions."
Quote: "The same light shines on vineyards that makes deserts." -Steve Hackett.
From: bell@apple.com (Mike Bell)
Subject: Re: MacTCP
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:12:45 GMT
Reply-To: bell@apple.com (Mike Bell)
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.

In article <1992Dec16.093457.13871@alijku05.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at>, Norbert 
Mueller <K360171@alijku11.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at> writes:

> If Macs with Ethernet hardware are delivered without MacTCP this
> is like selling a car without a steering wheel.
> Apple seriously should reconsider its MacTCP policy !!!!
> 
> STAY AWAY FROM SYSTEM 7.1 UNTIL THE MacTCP and SANE (Omega) problems
> have been solved in a reasonable way.
> 
> Norbert M1ller
> Institute of Chemistry
> Johannes Kepler University
> A-4040 Linz
> Austria 
> e-mail K360171@ALIJKU11.bitnet
>        K360171@EDVZ.uni-linz.ac.at
>        Norbert@soft.uni-linz.ac.at


Just out of curiosity, what problems are we talking about ? MacTCP 1.1.1 
works fine under 7.1. And Omega SANE, well, I only know of 1 app that it 
broke; is there some other problem ? System 7.1 has been a big win for me.




Mike



********************************************************

Mike Bell										     	       	      email: bell@apple.com
Senior Engineer
68000 High Performance Software Group
MS 60-CS
Apple Computer, Inc.
20525 Mariani Ave.
Cupertino, CA 95014

********************************************************
From: Eric.Choi@zeus.ieee.org (Eric Choi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: PRODIGY New and improved
Date: 19 Dec 92 21:40:28 GMT
Organization: IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ

There is no good dim sum in Michigan! 

  
  jm> Prodigy. Well I feel obliged to respond.  I've used Prodigy for a
  jm> couple of years and like it very much.  I tried Compuserve and think
  jm> it SUCKS!  So there you are! What do they say, "different strokes for
  jm> different folks, etc"?
  jm> 
  jm> --- Squish v1.01
  jm>  * Origin: zeus.ieee.org * [140.98.1.1]  (1:107/10)

You both are right. If you expect Prodigy to be the same as CompuServe or
Internet, forget it. They are not going to charge you a flat fee per month for
unlimited access without all those commercials I think Imran's expectation is
different than yours.

I tried Prodigy for two months before cancelling the service. I felt it was
handy to check on the news, stocks, do some online shopping, and all those
general stuff. My kids loved the stories with pictures. My reason for
cancellation was simply because Prodigy is not substantially different from
AOL and CompuServe, which I am already a subscriber. 

--  
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
 Eric Choi - Internet: Eric.Choi@zeus.ieee.org
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: ce_rupn@pavo.concordia.ca (RUPNIK, CHRISTOPHER E.)
Subject: How to modify ARA scripts?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Concordia University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 18:58:00 GMT

Hi.
	Well, I bought the cheapest modem i could find that was v32bis etc...
which was a BOCA 14.4k FAXmodem. 
	Needless to say, this primarely PC modem does not come with an ARA 
script, nor has the manufacturer ever heard of ARA. I have looked on SUMEX and
 some other places, but still have not gotten a script to connect.
	What i would like to do now is to modify an existing script. The problem
is that i guess you need some special software to do this, as RESEDIT does not.

	Is there a way to modify these scripts using PD software? thank you


 ce_rupn@pavo.concordia.ca

Xref: sparky comp.sys.mac.comm:12164 comp.sys.mac.hardware:24437