HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 13:40:45 CDT
From:         "William P. Oppel, Jr. (Billy)" <S70762OW@ETSUACAD.BITNET>
Subject:      Previews....

First of all, I would like to thank all of you who replied, thank you for
the kind remarks.  It has been a busy day at work, so far, and your comments
made it go much more smoother.

Secondly, I would like to thank Michelle Lehman, who commented on "Bombay"'s
name change to "The Mighty Ducks."  I have been tracking movies for years,
and the changes to scripts, storylines, and names are so fast, that it is
almost impossible to keep up with.  But, thank you Michelle, and the next
issue will correct that mistake.

Well, you have June, and seeing that this is July...the next issue should
be out by Monday, or shortly there after.  After that, I will try to have
it coming out monthly, on about the last or next to last week of the month.
Work has already gone into full swing for July's issue, including a more in
depth "Teasers" section, including independent film companies, and changes
to movies already listed, new additions, opening dates, and the unveiling
of the opening date for the theatre release of the director's cut of the 1982
hit, "Blade Runner."  Can you smell the tension now?

By the way, I will keep all back issues.  If you need another copy, just
contact me.

                                    Thanks, as always,
                                          Bill Oppel
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 20 Jul 1992 12:59:00 EST
From:         Gary Graffagnino <ACCGSG@HOFSTRA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: "Dead Again" and "JFK"

>Had the opportunity to finally see "Dead Again" and "JFK" (okay, I'm slow).
>Enjoyed both films very much.  Could anyone give me some other movies along the
>lines of "Dead Again" that I could rent?  What are some of the other movies
>that Kenneth Brauguah (sp?) are in?

Kenneth Brannagh is also in Henry V, an excellent movie.

>Watching JFK I really got caught up in it.  It was really a good film; I though
   t
>that the courtroom scene was a little too long, but it was a good film all in
>all.  How could anyone believe that "Magic Bullet" theory?

I agree.  A good flick, but the courtroom scene was a bit long.  However, I
though Costner did a pretty good acting job here.  Most people don't.  As for
the magic bullet theory.  I think after watching the movie and seeing Garrison
tear the theory apart it looks foolish.  But, back in the 60's an advocate of
the magic bullet theory would probsbly make it sound possible.  It all depends
upon the circumstances of the conversation.

                        Gary

    GARY GRAFFAGNINO       | "What I wouldn't give for a plate of
  accgsg@hofstra.bitnet    |  fried green tomatoes like we used to
 accgsg@vaxc.hofstra.edu   |  have at the Whistle Stop Cafe"
                           |               -Mrs. Cleo Threadgoode (FGT)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 09:51:02 +0000
From:         the Freshman Scott Huddle <huddle@VTTCF.CC.VT.EDU>
Subject: Re: "Twenty-one" and breaking the fourth wall
X-To:         CINEMA-L@AMERICAN.EDU

>...I did not recognize any of the names in the credits.

Is this the movie with Patsy Kensit (of Leathal Weapon 2 fame)?

-scott
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 09:31:24 -0500
From:         MARCI HENDRIX <HENDRIX@RHODES.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Fisher, cultural illiteracy, stream-of consciousness

Hey, Rick:  no flame intended, but please don't bash secretaries.
Generalities reveal depths, or lack thereof.  Marci Hendrix
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 14:34:52 +0000
From:         the Freshman Scott Huddle <huddle@VTTCF.CC.VT.EDU>
Subject: Re: a probably false rumor
X-To:         CINEMA-L@AMERICAN.EDU

 PORTIGAL_STEVE@TANDEM.COM writes:

>How could anyone mistake Gregg Allman for Bob Dylan?
>
>[my entire post, including a 119 line review, deleted.
>

Yes Gregg Allman was in it (I think also Jerry Garcia (?) had
one line), and *no* I'm not confusing the two.  I do seem to
remember something with Dylan in *that* movie.

You're right _Backtrack_ bites.

-scott

PS Learn to use your !@#&* editor.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 08:49:02 CST
From:         Rick Francis <C47805NF@WUVMD.BITNET>
Subject:      Patriot Games--reviewer demoted?

I just joined a couple of weeks ago, so tell me if this was driven into
the ground already.  Did any of you follow that uproar after a reviewer
panned Patriot Games?  In case you missed it, an  Irish-American reviewer
(I think it was Variety, not sure) decried the simplistic portrayal of
the Irish, the Brits, and the troubles in Northern Ireland.  As I remember
the movie production company put a great deal of pressure on the
journal/mag, which leapt to its figurative knees, apologized, said it
would never do such an offensive thing again, and that it wouldn't let
anyone Irish review such a movie, and then even said the offending r
reviewer would write no more reviews.

This is from fuzzy memory, so I am bringing it up for two other reasons:

Didn't the rest of you find Patriot Games every bit as bad as the reviewer
claimed, and

Is this situation with the reviews typical?  A resurrection of something
old, like the payola with pop music?  Are reviewers critics, and should
they be?

CINEMA-L:  All movies, all the time!   ;)   Rick Francis
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 13:04:53 PDT
From:         Joan Crenshaw <3714P@NAVPGS.BITNET>
Subject:      The Unforgiven

Fellow cinema-l'ers,
   The Monterey Peninsula Herald, that glorious paper second only to the Chicag
o Tribune, today announced the 4 August World Premiere of The Unforgiven, to
be held here in Monterey.  There will be a barbeque beforehand and tickets are
$75 each.  The movie stars some guy named Eastwood who used to be a local mayor
and one of our current Board of Supervisors, Sam Karras, as well as some other
unknowns named GeneHackman and Richard Harris.  Anyone want me to pick you up a
couple of tickets? (It ain't Dick Cavett, but what the hey!)
   By the way, it is true that one of our local supervisors has a bit part in t
he movie.  It was BIG NEWS (small town, you know), and Mr. Karras had to
abstain in a couple of supervisorial ballots regarding Eastwood ventures as a
result.
         Joan Crenshaw
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-To: CINEMA-L@american.edu
X-Vms-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@american.edu"
X-Vms-Cc: PGIORDANO
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 09:08:00 EDT
From:         Peter.Giordano@WILLIAMS.EDU
Subject:      Re: Cuts on TNT; CITY FOR CONQUEST; 1935 version of SHE
X-To:         CINEMA-L@american.edu

George asks what scene was cut from CITY OF CONQUEST? The whole first
act which establishes the relationships among all the "gang" on Forsyth
Street - They're all kids - You get two peeks : a) Googie as a kid gets
caught stealing and apple by the old timer (played by Frank Craven), b)
Peggy as a little girl dancing for a crowd in the street. The only other
scene that includes Frank Craven (who was given 4th billing) was as he
watches Danny come out of Madison Square Garden after a big fight. His
character (the old timer) was sort of a Greek chorus, very effective and
almost entirely absent in TNT's cut.

I was also gratful to TNT for show WINNER TAKE ALL and PICTURE SNATCHER, two
rare but important milestones in the creation of the Cagney screen persona.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 13:03:00 PDT
From:         Michael Bruce McDonald <MCDONALD@OREGON.BITNET>
Subject: Re: The Rapture

Gary, I want to echo Bill's praise for *The Rapture*, which I thought was
great enough to include on my list of ten when we did that exercise a
little while ago.

"And Mm."  *Finnegans Wake*, 115.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:12:01 PDT
From:         DU013@OASIS.CALPOLY.EDU
Subject:      Movie Databases
              30 Jul 1992 18:14:00 EDT from <JOURL205@KSUVXA.KENT.EDU>

From:  Mary Shaffer


How do you access the database at boulder.colorado.edu? What's available?
There have been at least two references in recent posts and I was curious
and thought others on the list might want to know, too.

Thanks,
Mary
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 08:40:11 PDT
From:         Jennifer Porro <BL.JMP@RLG.BITNET>
Subject:      Screen-L

REPLY TO 07/27/92 07:12 FROM CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET "Discussions on all forms of
Cinema": Re: Serious discussion of cinema

Unless Screen-L has changed in the last six months, when I was a
subscriber there weren't any discussions (or postings in fact)
at all.  Occasionally people would write in asking why there was no
activity on Screen-L and someone would suggest they subscribe to
Cinema-L.        Jennifer Porro

To:  CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 10:17:00 -0700
From:         PORTIGAL_STEVE@TANDEM.COM
Subject:      Patriot Games--reviewer demoted?
X-To:         cinema-l@auvm.american.edu

Unfortunately, I no longer have the article, but there was a story in the
paper recently about the spate of "non-names" giving great reviews in the
ads.

ie:
"Subcutenously overwhelming!" kfj
and so on.

Seriously, though...the reviewers are credited as being from NBC or some
such thing, and then some investigation shows that they create little
60 second spots for an NBC affiliate in some small place, and these are more
of the commercial variety as opposed to the objective film review (we've
all seen these magazines in the theatres that just PLUG and never REVIEW)
that we *might* get from a real newspaper etc.

It seems they just find anyone who will say great things, and then put htem
in the ad.  The people who are not very well known in the entertainment
industry are willing to make these statements because it certainly raises
their own professional profile.

Getting kind of ridiculous it seems....

Steve

------------   ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT   --------
SENT 07-27-92 FROM SMTPGATE (CINEMA-L@auvm.american.edu)

I just joined a couple of weeks ago, so tell me if this was driven into
the ground already.  Did any of you follow that uproar after a reviewer
panned Patriot Games?  In case you missed it, an  Irish-American reviewer
(I think it was Variety, not sure) decried the simplistic portrayal of
the Irish, the Brits, and the troubles in Northern Ireland.  As I remember
the movie production company put a great deal of pressure on the
journal/mag, which leapt to its figurative knees, apologized, said it
would never do such an offensive thing again, and that it wouldn't let
anyone Irish review such a movie, and then even said the offending r
reviewer would write no more reviews.

This is from fuzzy memory, so I am bringing it up for two other reasons:

Didn't the rest of you find Patriot Games every bit as bad as the reviewer
claimed, and

Is this situation with the reviews typical?  A resurrection of something
old, like the payola with pop music?  Are reviewers critics, and should
they be?

CINEMA-L:  All movies, all the time!   ;)   Rick Francis
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: CLERC
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:45:00 EST
From:         CLERC@GENESEO.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Addison de Witt

>I admit my literary deficiencies.  Who is Addison de Witt and what is his
>relevance to cultural (il)literacy?  (If Addison de Witt is/was a female
>I apologize, but point out again, that my mistake is due to ignorance.)
>
>David  accdak@vaxc.hofstra.edu  //  accdak@hofstra

        Addison de Witt is the theatre critic (aka "venomous fishwife" and
"professional manure-slinger") played by George Sanders in _All About Eve._
He has most of the good lines and if I were having a dinner party and
could invite only movie characters, he'd be top of the list...I was so
jealous of kjf when he was compared to Addison...

                        Sue
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 31 Jul 1992 09:01:15 EST
From:         Bill Felty <BILL.FELTY@UKWANG.UKY.EDU>
Subject:      Vincent and Theo
X-To:         "CINEMA-L%AUVM.AMERICAN.E"
              <CINEMA-L%AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU@UKCC.UKY.EDU>

Jennifer and David,

Thanks for recommending _Vincent and Theo_.  I saw it last night and loved it.
If anyone else is contemplating seeing it, please do.  It is excellent.

Bill Felty
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Sun, 26 Jul 1992 13:36:27 CST
From:         Rick Francis <C47805NF@WUVMD.BITNET>
Subject:      Focus of list? Contemporary theory or group dynamics?

I'm a newcomer to this list so I don't have the historical background.  Heh.
But the only stated purposes I have come across seem to be:

1) to provide amusement for some superior beings, who apparently sit around
   and snicker at our impoverished ability to discuss issues, or respond to
   the scintillating comments of the superior beings.

2)  to provide fodder for some sort of Group Dynamics class.  Actually I
    have long thought that the nets could provide lots of raw material
    for such a study--but not for how people deal with each other in
    general!  I hope no one thinks that net-behavior patterns can be
    extrapolated to other types of confrontations!  It seems obvious that
    folks don't act the same as in their extra-net communicative lives.

Would a person opposing gov't labeling of entertainment be labelled a Mad
Anarchist?  On the list, yes.  In a classroom?  A student, by a professor?
Not in my experience, but then I haven't had a class with Fisher.

I wasn't going to mention it until I came across Tanya's post, but she is
quite right:  anyone who thinks that Barthes (note the correct spelling, kjf)
and Levi-Strauss represent contemporary sophistication must have been asleep
since 1968.  Uh, Fisher, hate to break this to you... but they are dead.
Deader than vaudeville.  Being able to associate the word "structuralist"
with Levi-Strauss is about as witty as one would expect from a first-semester
freshman.  Hardly an example of rapier wit, eh?  What the heck do you teach,
anyhow?

Struggling valiantly to provide material for mockery,

I remain, bored and hoping for a list on film,

Rick Francis
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 08:49:25 PDT
Comments:     Resent-From: Joan Crenshaw <3714P@NAVPGS>
Comments:     Originally-From: Ray Hoy <RAY@MCO.BITNET>
From:         Joan Crenshaw <3714P@NAVPGS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Tipper and Co.

Ray,
   Not so young, this is my 6th Presidential Election.  Just this time
it feels hopeless.  Family values?  Whose?  I actually saw a program where
Sununu was asking the NOW representative if she didn't think the nuclear
family with the mother at home was best....oops, wait while I climb down
off the soapbox...sorry..
                               Joan
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>
>Back to a depressing thought:  For the first time, when choosing a candidate,
>i get to choose not the best person for the job, but the person who will do
>the least harm.
>
>                 Joan

You must be young.  I feel like I've been making that same choice for the
last 20 years.


Ray Hoy  RAY@MCO.BITNET
Medical College of Ohio
Toledo Ohio
From: 3714P@NAVPGS.BITNET (Joan Crenshaw)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Subject: re: Multi-Spoiler
Date: 31 Jul 92 15:19:03 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-To:         "CINEMA-L%AUVM.AMERICAN.E"
              <CINEMA-L%AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
Comments:     Resent-From: Joan Crenshaw <3714P@NAVPGS>
Comments:     Originally-From: Bill Felty <BILL.FELTY@UKWANG.UKY.EDU>

>Joan,

>Surely you've seen _The Wizard of Oz_!!  Dorothy wakes up at the end....  : )

>Bill Felty
   No, Joan, don't feel like a complete fool!  It's bad enough to look like
one!
   Thanks, Bill!
                Joan  8-(
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 08:31:30 EDT
From:         John <JBC@ERS.BITNET>
Subject:      The Star Wars mentality
              20 Jul 1992 09:43:00 -0700 from <PORTIGAL_STEVE@TA NDEM.COM>

On Mon, 20 Jul 1992 09:43:00 -0700 <PORTIGAL_STEVE@TANDEM.COM> said:
>
>And what happened to mainstream X movies like Midnight Cowboy and Last Tango
>in Paris? Hollywood just doesn't make them anymore.
>
If Midnight Cowboy was released today, it would have an R rating.  The films
that initially got an X are pretty tame by today's standards.  Last Tango...
is a little different, but it wasn't made in Hollywood.

But more importantly...if Midnight Cowboy was PROPOSED today, it wouldn't
stand a chance.  Not in this post-Star-Wars Hollywood that we all caught a
glimpse of thanks to Altman.  Hollywood doesn't make movies anymore, it makes
blockbusters, and if it weren't for a handful of artists with enough clout to
get their work financed (Jonathan Demme, Robert Altman, David Lynch, John
Sayles, Jim Jarmusch) and the many lesser-known or up-and-coming independents
(like the woman who directed Children of the Dust) there wouldn't be anything
American worth watching.  The rating system didn't ruin Hollywood...it was
Star Wars.
John
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.3 5/22/91)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 20:42:37 -0400
From:         Laura Hayes Burchard <lhb6v@FARADAY.CLAS.VIRGINIA.EDU>
Subject:      Reel Conversations
X-To:         cinema-l%auvm.BITNET@uvaarpa.Virginia.EDU

In article <1992Jul8.230540.28624@leland.Stanford.EDU> aku@leland.Stanford.EDU
 (Andrew Chia-Tso Ku) writes:
>Yes, you're right, Hickenlooper used those words; Ebert just agreed.
>I remember Pauline Kael also remarking that STAR WARS was responsible
>for starting the blockbuster mentality in Hollywood.  I remember her
>writing (in a review of one of the STAR WARS sequels, I believe) that
>just before that movie came out, American movies were gaining new
>maturity and becoming more personal than ever before, and that STAR
>WARS ruined it because Hollywood started tailoring movies to younger
>audiences.

Pfui.  They went where the market was, they always have.  You could
argue just as much that STAR WARS saved the industry, by increasing
the audiences and bringing profits to the studios that allowed
'personal' movies to get made.  A small scale, intimate picture is
also a picture that it's easy to say 'I'll catch it on video.'
while epics and special effects blockbusters are the things the
big screen does uniquely well.

My cynicism monitor always goes off when I hear elegiac tributes to how
today is just a dim shadow of the days of wine and roses. What golden
age?  The days of the studios, when stars were chained to contracts
and practically treated as property? The days of the Code?  The 70's,
home of such majestic works as 'Herbie the Love Bug' (Ok, the last
is a cheap shot :), but people sometimes act as if 'high
concept' was invented in the eighties.)

Unless my reading has deeply decieved me, between the rise of cable and
video and the opening and multiplication of the European airwaves, the
market has vastly expanded over the last ten years, which means more
money and more niches for everyone.  In fact, a piece I was reading
on the Royal Shakespeare Company commented as to one of the factors
in it's recent troubles was that the demand for product was so
voracious that it was hard to get even fair actors to commit to a stretch
with them, since they could get much more from movies and television.

I had much the same problem with the Player.  I failed to see what
was so dreadful about this vision of Hollywood.  Why, the shame of it.
You are forced to attract the exec's attention before he'll give you
millions of dollars to make your movie.  Oooh, dread.  Horror.  The
studio will change the product to make them more money.  I'm just
reeling.

Laura

--

Address alias changed -- good addresses are now lhb4v@virginia.edu and
lhb6v@faraday.clas.virginia.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 11:12:57 CDT
Comments:     Resent-From: "A.J. Wright" <MEDS002@UABDPO>
Comments:     Originally-From: Buryl <BWOODAR1@UA1VM.BITNET>
From:         "A.J. Wright" <MEDS002@UABDPO.BITNET>
Subject:      Tipper and Co.

Well, back in the days of my stupid youth I used to have this same contemp-
tuous attitude toward the Tippers of the late sixties and early seventies
(anybody remember Spiro T. Agnew?), but now that I'm in my stupid middle age
a different perspective is starting to seep into the addled brain...I think
it has something to do with having kids and turning into one's parents...
you really start to ask yourself how to protect your eight and four year old
from all the cultural garbage swirling around that our parents didn't have to
worry about...So what's the answer, metalhead? I like the first amendment as
well as anyone; I just wish some of this stuff wasn't so hard to defend, ya'
know? I've always been a 1st amend. purist and plan to remain so, but I sure
can understand where the Tippers are coming from...maybe we should have a
little less contempt and a little more dialog with "those" people, ya' know?
A.J. Wright/meds002@uabdpo

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
It wasn't heavy-metal types who caused Tipper to go over the edge.  The cause
was her daughter bringing home a copy of the Purple Rain soundtrack.  When
Tipper heard "Darling Nikki" she went ballistic.  We've had nothing but grief
ever since.  She claimed at the time to target only the worst excesses, but
that has not been the case.  Anyone who has read her book or seen the PMRC
videotape can attest to her attacks at mainstream music.  This from someone
who prides herself on her collection of Beatles, Rolling Stone, and Grateful
Dead albums.  Now there's a selection of wholesome, fun-for-the-whole-family
music. Gimme a break!!

                                          B. Woodard
                                             Metalhead-at-large
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 09:29:01 EST
From:         Bill Felty <BILL.FELTY@UKWANG.UKY.EDU>
Subject:      The Water Dance
X-To:         "CINEMA-L%AUVM.AMERICAN.E"
              <CINEMA-L%AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU@UKCC.UKY.EDU>

Gayle et al.

I also saw "The Water Dance" and thought it was great!  I was amazed at the
performances of Wesley Snipes, Helen Hunt and Eric Stoltz.  If anyone has
a chance to see this, please do...I think you'll be pleased.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:06:05 +0000
From:         the Freshman Scott Huddle <huddle@VTTCF.CC.VT.EDU>
Subject: Re: a probably false rumor
X-To:         CINEMA-L@AMERICAN.EDU

>I saw Rush and neither Dylan nor Garcia was in it.

Who was the bartender that ran out in the street and shouted some
epithet.  He is some famous musician (Peter, Paul, Mary?)

-scott (huddle@vttcf.cc.vt.edu)

(Aren't return addresses listed in your header, regardless.)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU