HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bradley@reed.edu (Ben Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Ganassi/Luyendyk (and other thoughts)
Keywords: Indy Car, Rally
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:43:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Nov11.174310.23051
Organization: Reed College, Portland OR

This is probably old news, but I figured I'd post it anyway.  I read
in this morning's Oregonian (Portland's daily newspaper) that Chip
Ganassi has signed Arie Luyendyk to a one year contract to drive the
1993 PPG Indy Car series.  He replaces Eddie "Undera-" Cheever who had
a couple of lacklustre seasons with the team.  Cheever has always cited
lack of testing time as the main reason he never won a race; in fair-
ness he did have some good finishes and might have had a win were it not
for some untimely mechanical problems or brain fade.

Still waiting to see who Hall/VDS signs, whether IMSA can field more
than ten GTP cars for more than Daytona and Sebring, and who Team Willy
will sign for next year...

Oh yeah, I'll post some info on the Capitol Forest Stages National Pro
Rally when I get the results (sooner if anyone nags me and doesn't care
if I make some factual errors).  I'll just say that Tim O'Neil and Tom
Burgess took overall and Production GT honors in a Mitsubishi Galant VR4.

Cheers!
Ben
-- 
Ben Bradley                            Rally Drivers Do It Sideways!!
Reed College
Portland, OR                           The little critters of nature,
bradley@reed.edu                       They don't know that they're ugly.
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
From: tomh@wes.on.ca (Tom Haapanen)
Subject: Re: Yet more trivia from Autosport (Answers -- finally!)
Organization: Waterloo Engineering Software
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:29:02 GMT

I wrote much earlier...
> The latest Autosport which arrived here Thursday (the 15 Oct issue) had
> a little trivia contest to win a copy of Grand Prix Requiem, but I think
> it's a little bit too late to be one of the first 10 entries... :)
> However, I liked the questions, and I present them for your enjoyment:

I have included the "correct" answers, as far as can be figured out, under
each question.  Has Autosport printed the answers yet?

>    1. Which World Champion went for a swim in the Monaco Harbour?
     >> Alberto Ascari

>    2. What linked the deaths of Graham Hill, Carlos Pace and Wilbur Shaw?
     >> All died in a plane crash.

>    3. What links Dick Seaman, Stirling Moss and Peter Collins?
     >> They are all British, and all died in crashes.  Possibly all drove
	for Mercedes or ERA.

>    4. What nationality was Gilles Villeneuve?
     >> Canadian

>    5. Who was the only posthumous World Champion?
     >> Jochen Rindt

>    6. Whose nickname was "Seppi"?
     >> Jo Siffert

>    7. Peter Revson was a member of a famous cosmetics family.  What was the
>       name brand of the cosmetics?
     >> Revlon

>    8. What racing driver from the late '60s was a member of a brewing 
>       company?
     >> I believe the "correct" answer was Piers Courage, but Augie Pabst
	is acceptable as well, I guess -- evn if he didn't drive F1 (or 
	did he?).

>    9. What British racing driver was killed in the Moroccan GP?
     >> Stewart Lewis-Evans.

>   10. Where was Mike Hawthorn's first full Grand Prix win?
     >> His first win was in Reims, France in '53.  Somehow the wording of
	the question leaves me unsure of whether this is correct or not,
	though.

Here is the scoring ... I haven't given anyone credit for #3, as the answer
is still unknown!  The 8*'s are the "Augie Pabst" answers, for which I gave
just a little bit less credit than for "Piers Courage"...

9/10:	Pete Fenelon
	1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

9-/10: 	Dan Jones
	1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8* 9 10
	"Number 3 is pretty shakey, but I think most of the rest are ok."

8/10:   Mark Jackson
	1 2 - 4 5 6 7 - 9 10

7/10:	George M. Smiley
    	1 2 - 4 5 - 7 - 9 10
    	"Oh well, half (or less) right isn't that bad."

7/10:	Robert Marti
	1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8 - -
	"Somehow, I find this quiz a little "morbid" considering that Ascari,
	 G. Hill, Pace, Collins, G. Villeneuve, Siffert, Revson, Courage
	 and Hawthorn's all died in racing, plane or street accidents ..."

7-/10:	Simon A Sykes-Wright
	1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8* - -

7-/10:	John Davison
	1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8* - -

5/10:	Ben Loosli
	- 2 - 4 5 6 7 - - -

5/10:	Chris Palmer
       - - - 4 5 6 7 8 - -

5-/10:	Russell Jaslow
	- 2 - 4 5 - 7 8* - -

Hey, everyone got at least half right -- a great showing!

[ \tom haapanen  |  "only auto racing, bullfighting and mountain climbing are ]
[ tomh@wes.on.ca |   sports -- all others are only games" -- ernest hemingway ]
[ waterloo engineering software |     "to thine own self be true" -- polonius ]
From: lindblad@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Jarkko Lindblad)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: More Sauber Tests at Barcelona
Date: 10 Nov 92 21:26:27 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Jonathan Swaby (JFS10@psuvm.psu.edu) wrote:
> I don't think Ferraris problems at the end of the season were the chassis, but
> the engine. For a while know people have been talking about the lack of power

Well, it does give a lot more power and torque than the engine
Scuderia Italia used in 1991-season. However, it is probably
undoerpowered and overweighted for a 12-cylider engine.

> from the motor. They said on the tube that in the last two races the Ferraris
> were among the slowest when it came to straight line speed. I was suggested
> that the engines not be used next year.

The biggest problem is the aerodynamics of the revolutionary design,
also with active suspension the car is about 30 kg overweighted.

-- 
Jarkko Lindblad         | Those people who tell you not to
lindblad@cc.helsinki.fi |   take chances
------------------------| they are all missing on what life is about
This space if for sale  |                        - Metallica
From: jeff@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Jeff Freymueller)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: Adelaide: Senna-Mansell crash
Date: 9 Nov 1992 21:23:44 GMT
Organization: Stanford Univ. Earth Sciences
NNTP-Posting-Host: pangea.stanford.edu

Michael MY Hui  (myhui@bnr.ca):
>
>Now, why Patresse was consistently so slow in the race as well as in
>the qualifying can be due to one or all of four reasons:
>
>1. lack of skill
>2. inferior or broken (during race) equipment
>3. lack of motivation
>4. knowing it's a long hard race, he wants to save chassis and rubber
>
>Me, being a Patresse and Williams fan, must vote for "4".

Although, I don't call myself a Patrese fan, I would agree. At the time
of his retirement, he was the only top runner who hadn't pitted for tires.
And he was still able to keep Berger behind.

Although I wonder if maybe he had been experiencing gearbox trouble from
the start, and chose to save his tires rather than risk a stop.

Jeff
From: ecrjbruce@economics.adelaide.edu.au
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: Aus GP Stuff
Date: 13 Nov 92 17:39:05 ACST
Organization: Economics, University of Adelaide
NNTP-Posting-Host: eco.economics.adelaide.edu.au

>  In my book this counts as Mansell
> doing something stupid, There was no way Senna could avoid it.

Funny how Nigel managed to do it in Spain (?) a couple of years back, and he
was hounding Senna even more closely than Senna was here.

> Watching the interviews afterwards showed how much Senna had matured
> and what a whinger Mansell really is.  Senna basically said "These
> things happen", Mansell ranted and raved like a two year old.

It's always easy to be a "these things happen" type when you're in the wrong. 
From what we saw the Williams was not as responsive to braking as the McLaren
(due to carbon fibre type used?) so NM had to brake earlier.  As for braking
20m earlier, go view the tape.  The carbon type brakes the Williams used glow
red when the slightest touch was applied (got some great photo's)and I couldn't
see it on the replay.

Besides any driver who runs up the rear of another is at fault, its just the
way it is.  If you choose to sit that close you take the risk (and
responsability) of causing a prang.

As for Ayrton being mature look at the way he ranted when he wouldn't get the
best car next season.  At least NM had the excuse that he really wanted to win
the last race for his sister (who lives over here).

> 
> It looked like Berger ran out of fuel crossing the line, Schumacher


Apparently he did.  Given that Senna was pressing even harder it makes Senna's
actions even more puzzling.



regs

Rob

Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
From: andyw@meaddata.com (Andy Welter)
Subject: Re: open-wheel drag (Re: F1 Stuff)
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:37:29 GMT
Reply-To: andyw@meaddata.com

In article 21499@pixel.kodak.com, jaslow@bissun.kodak.com (Russell Jaslow) writes:
>In article <1992Nov12.155018.28582@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> slana@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (charles.e.slana) writes:
>>Cd's of the same car equipped with '92 tires vs '93 tires.  Actually, I'd
>>also like to see a Cd comparison between an Indy Car, a F1 car, and
>>either a WSC or IMSA GTP car.
>>
>
>Can't give you the exact comparison you want, but how about a bit of memory
>recall (i.e., may not be reliable).
>I once heard an Indy Car Cd is 1.2.
>Compare this to my '82 RX-7 which is .34.
>And even that is outdated, as mini-vans now do better than my sports car!!!
>-- 

I would guess that the major contributor to race car drag would be the
wings.  With all the downforce that racecars have, the wings would have to
add alot to the drag as well.  If that is the case, you would see a major
difference between the Cd of an Indy car with its low downforce/drag setup
for the Indy 500, and the Cd of an Indy Car setup for a road course.

For you non-Indy car viewers, occasionally ESPN shows the difference between 
the wing sizes of the different setups... is pretty dramatic.  The superspeedway
wings are maybe 25% the size of the road course on the front, and about 50%
the size on the back.  (if my memory serves me correctly)

Also they are usually simple looking single plane wings instead of having 
extensive wickerbills.(sp?)

Physics question:  What are the units that Cd is measured in???  How do you 
convert Cd to the actual force of drag at a given speed?

---
|Andrew Welter	     |  All views are mine and not |      (513) 865-6822   
|Mead Data Central   |    that of my employer      |      pd&o-ps-ts-dsp       
|P.O. Box 933        |                             |     andyw@meaddata.com
|Dayton, Ohio  45401 |          	           | ...!uunet!meaddata!andyw
From: danjones@pyrps5.eng.pyramid.com (Dan Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: More Sauber Tests at Barcelona
Date: 9 Nov 92 22:06:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: pyramid.184186
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corporation, Mountain View

Ian G Batten writes:
>Dan Jones writes:
>> <sarcasm on>
>> Therefore, I would like to say that the F3000 Reynard is a better car
>> than the F1 Ferrari.
>> <sarcasm off>
>
>From watching F3000 racing this year, and the ``handling'' of this
>year's Ferrari, I don't see quite what is so stupid about this
>comparison.  I rather suspect Gerhard is hoping for change.

Granted, the Ferrari isn't a good F1 car, and the Reynard is a good F3000
car, but the bottom line is lap times.  I think most drivers would prefer
a Ferrari F1 car over a Reynard F3000 car.  And my statement makes a bit 
more sense in its original context.

Dan Jones
From: phil@muppet.bt.co.uk (Phil Houseago DNM22)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: F1: Australian GP on TV
Date: 6 Nov 92 13:53:23 GMT
Reply-To: phil@muppet.bt.co.uk
Organization: British Telecom

In article 364@fs1.mcc.ac.uk, zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd) writes:
##Anybody know what time it's going out on UK TV?  I missed the Jap GP coz my 
##newspaper hid it in the small print.
##
#  
3.15 if i remember right, so                              vvv  no.

---
phil houseago - 73 de g8sgb	                        |Isn't it midnight somewhere??   
phil@muppet.bt.co.uk		|shouldn't I be asleep??
 +44 473 648 199		|
From: mjackson.wbst147@xerox.com (Mark Jackson)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: F1 teams 1993 (was: More Sauber Tests at Barcelona)
Date: 10 Nov 92 15:41:01 GMT
Reply-To: mjackson.wbst147@xerox.com
Organization: Xerox Corporation, Webster NY

In article 22395@minster.york.ac.uk, pete@minster.york.ac.uk writes:

> [P]requalifying. . .
> should be back next season if Sauber, Pacific and Trebron turn up and
> Brabham and Fondmetal are back.... 

> BTW, has anyone heard anything about Trebron since their launch? Are they a
> vapourware team? No drivers named, no sponsors.... I'm beginning to think
> they're a con!

OK, which teams *are* expected to contest F1 in 1993?  Clearly we can
look for those present in Australia:  Williams, McLaren, Benetton,
Ferrari, Lotus, Tyrrell, Footwork, Ligier, March, Scuderia Italia (Lola
chassis replacing Dallara), Larrousse (calling their chassis something
else than Venturi?), Minardi, and Jordan.  Of these, I understand March
is the softest; presumably they're losing the Ilmor engine next year,
and their finances have been shaky.

Question:  What became of rumors that Konrad was going to buy out the
current March owners?

As far as other teams from 1992, Andrea Moda is dead, Fondmetal seem
highly unlikely to continue, and Brabham is uncertain.

Question:  What *is* Brabham's status?  (/On Track/ reported a couple of
weeks back that Alan Randall had bought the team assets and was
planning on running Mexican F2 / F3 star Carlos Guerrero in 1993; there
was also talk of a possible engine deal with Isuzu.)

For the new teams, Sauber is set.  Pacific seems fairly firm, although
I've seen nothing recently.  Trebron has been as quiet as Dhainhaut.
Anyone have news?

---
Mark <MJackson.Wbst147@Xerox.COM>

  Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
		- Lord Acton, who is almost always misquoted
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
From: agwiii@fang.att.com (Grayson Walker (660-7949)(12/92))
Subject: Re: Schumacher for 1993 champion?
Organization: AT&T Tax Systems Development, Maitland FL
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:04:56 GMT

Ryan T. Wood writes:
>
>Don't forget about the Ferrari's.  New team manager and new design.  They'll 
>be ready!!  <I hope and pray that they'll be ready!!>
>
>                                   /  \
>                      |============================|
>                      |============================|
>                      |         /   []   \         |
>          __________  |=============[]=============|  __________
>         /          \ | ____/_______[]_______\____ | /          \
>         |          |  /_____/~~~~~~[]~~~~~~\_____\  |          |
>         |          |********|  Ferrari F1  |********|          |
>         |          |********|_____    _____|********|          |
>         |          | _|_____/@@ @@\__/@@ @@\_____|_ |          |
>         \__________/                                \__________/
>   ~`'~~`~~~~'~~~'~~`~~'~`~~~`~~`'~~'~~`~~`'~'`~`~'~~`~~~`~~`~~`~~~`~~
>               Yes, I'm still a devoted Ferrari F1 fan!!!
>
Can't improve on this one. 
-- 
Grayson Walker                                           CHC, Maitland, Florida 
Forza!                                            Internet: agwiii@fang.att.com
Voice: 407 660 7949               ". . . big brown river . . ." Tuli Kupferberg
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
From: hanss@microsoft.com (Hans Spiller)
Subject: Re: IMSA vs. IndyCar
Date: 11 Nov 92 02:55:53 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.

In article <7210749599567@c00027-207dan.eos.ncsu.edu> jcsmith@eos.ncsu.edu wrote:
> 
> Someone asked about this after Laguna Seca, but I had incomplete information 
> at the time.  Here is a comparison of 1992 fast qualifier times:
> 
> 
>                        IndyCar        IMSA
>                       ---------     --------
>      Portland         1:00.658      1:00.354
>      Laguna Seca      1:11.185      1:11.587
>      Road America     1:48.2105     1:47.913
>      Mid-Ohio         1:08.766      1:09.586
>
I interpret this to mean the indy cars are faster in the corners and the imsa
cars are faster on the straights.  portland and road america both have multiple
long straights, which laguna and mid ohio lack.  were all four of these imsa
times set by the toyota/eagles?  does anybody have trap times?
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
From: jcsmith@eos.ncsu.edu (Jay C. Smith)
Subject: IMSA vs. IndyCar
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:35:59 GMT


Someone asked about this after Laguna Seca, but I had incomplete information 
at the time.  Here is a comparison of 1992 fast qualifier times:


                       IndyCar        IMSA
                      ---------     --------
     Portland         1:00.658      1:00.354
     Laguna Seca      1:11.185      1:11.587
     Road America     1:48.2105     1:47.913
     Mid-Ohio         1:08.766      1:09.586


--
Jay C. Smith
Domain/internet: jcsmith@eos.ncsu.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Good.  For a minute I thought we were in trouble."
From: ecrjbruce@economics.adelaide.edu.au
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: More Sauber Tests at Barcelona
Date: 10 Nov 92 17:18:14 ACST
Organization: Economics, University of Adelaide
NNTP-Posting-Host: eco.economics.adelaide.edu.au

In article <1992Nov5.212417.23771@neptune.inf.ethz.ch>, marti@inf.ethz.ch (Robert Marti) writes:
> In article <1dbt41INN9n1@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ah335@cleveland.Freenet.Edu
> (Richard Banks) writes:
>>In a previous article, marti@inf.ethz.ch (Robert Marti) says:
>>>Last week, Wendlinger clocked 1:21.51 at Barcelona.  Today's daily
>>>newspaper says that Karl Wendlinger, driving the Sauber-Ilmor,
>>>clocked a new best of 1:20.04 at Barcelona.  Nigel Mansell's pole
>>>time at the GP in May was 1:20.19.
>>
>>Doesn't Barcelona have a long straight?
>>Wasn't he using 93 tires?
> 
> As I wrote in an earlier article, Sauber has said that they'll do the
> first tests according to the 92 regulations, so I assume they used the
> 92 setup.  However, I can't be sure since the info is from a mini-
> article printed in the sports section of the largest daily newspaper
> in Zurich (which in turn is the city with most inhabitants in Switzer-
> land, something like 350'000).
> 


One of the more interesting rumours reported in Adelaide this weekend was that
Ayrton Senna would be driving for Sauber next year.  This was reported in "The
Advertiser" (which is a major daily Matt) and also on Channel 9 (a major
network) News.  ANyone heard anything further??

Also said that the Sauber was a 92 configuration that set the time mentioned
above.

Lots of empty space follows my editor doesn't allow posts shorter than the
original to be posted.

Regs

Rob
























> -- 
> Robert Marti                        Phone:    +41 1 254 72 60
> Institut fur Informationssysteme
> ETH-Zentrum                         Internet: marti@inf.ethz.ch
> CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland         UUCP:     ...uunet!mcvax!ethz!marti
From: JFS10@psuvm.psu.edu (Jonathan Swaby)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: Schumacher for 1993 champion?
Date: 10 Nov 92 17:50:11 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

In article <9211101538.AA28965@deepthought.cs.utexas.edu>,
PHT007%SIRIUS.UKC.AC.UK@ib.rl.ac.uk says:

>This is my first posting, so please bear with me.

>How does everyone feel about next years world Champion?
>I reckon it is gonna be Schumacher as:

>1) Williams is now going to lose Mansell and thus ther motivation. With all
>the
>   trouble this year over drivers, they will be in somewhat a dissarray.
Prost will win the championship, but he will not have an easy time of it.
The Benetton team will be a close second in the constructors title.


>2) McLaren don't have a decent engine for next year and no Senna.
Who can really say. Ford V-8's could do it. Renault lost a lot of
hp because of the fuel change. A Ford V-8 and a good chassis could
give Team Willy a run for the money.


>3) Patrese is good, but I think Schumachers pace after 1 full year is going to
>   improve to the point where not even Patrese will be able to keep up! As
>with
>   Martin this year
There were several occassions were Martin out did his teammate. No doubt
Schumacher will be one of the best, but not yet. Patrese is good. He
can win races on his own. He will out do Schumacher in the beginning.

>4) A Benetton Ford V-12 an exciting prospect.!!
Everyone seems to think that V-10s are the way to go. They said
on the tube that Schumacher said he will be using a V-8. I had heard
in the past that with the smaller tyres a V-8 would be good. Benetton
was suppose to have been testing with the V-12 since mid season. They
must have some problem with the engine. I have not heard any other
talk about the engine all year. No mention of dyno testing. No mention
of anything.

Jonathan Swaby

>Well thats my opinion!
>Chris.
From: winalski@adserv.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: Schumacher for 1993 champion?
Date: 10 Nov 92 21:20:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: nntpd2.1992Nov10.212048.24512
Reply-To: winalski@adserv.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Nashua NH


In article <9211101538.AA28965@deepthought.cs.utexas.edu>,
PHT007%SIRIUS.UKC.AC.UK@ib.rl.ac.uk writes:
|>
|>How does everyone feel about next years world Champion?
|>I reckon it is gonna be Schumacher as:
|>
[mentions that Mansell won't be at Williams, Senna won't be at McLaren, and
 Patrese won't be able to keep up with Schumacher]

Don't forget that Alain Prost will be at Williams next year.

--PSW
From: pete@minster.york.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: Schumacher for 1993 champion?
Date: 12 Nov 92 13:07:09 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of York, England

PHT007%SIRIUS.UKC.AC.UK@ib.rl.ac.uk wrote:
: This is my first posting, so please bear with me.
: 
: How does everyone feel about next years world Champion?
: I reckon it is gonna be Schumacher as:
: 
: 1) Williams is now going to lose Mansell and thus ther motivation. With all the
:    trouble this year over drivers, they will be in somewhat a dissarray.
: 
: 2) McLaren don't have a decent engine for next year and no Senna.
: 
: 3) Patrese is good, but I think Schumachers pace after 1 full year is going to
:    improve to the point where not even Patrese will be able to keep up! As with
:    Martin this year
: 
: 4) A Benetton Ford V-12 an exciting prospect.!!
: 
: Well thats my opinion!
: Chris.

I think you're forgetting a certain highly political Frenchman with a big
ego and a Williams FW15.

I reckon the top few places next season will be something like this:

	1)	Prost
	2)	Schumacher
	3)	Berger
	4)	Williams #2 driver (TBN!)
	5)	Hakkinen
	6)	Patrese
	7)	Alesi
	8)	Andretti

Pete
--
*Peter Fenelon -- Research Associate -- Software Safety Assessment Procedures*
Dept. of Computer Science, University of York, York, Y01 5DD (+44/0)904 433388
EMAIL: pete@minster.york.ac.uk `There's no room for enigmas in built up areas'
From: cg894@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Brian Lee Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
Subject: Re: F1 Stuff
Date: 11 Nov 1992 22:01:42 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I have read about some teams playing around with wings that
bent under certain loads.  For example, on a long straight, the
wing would bennd down slightly, thus reducing drag.  This may
or may not be in use, but I wouldn't doubt it for a second.
I don't guess there is a FISA-mandated wing structural rigidity
standard (wouldn't suprise me though).

-- 
      
Brian Wilson...                 Not from the Beach Boys!

Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport
From: TBACKMAN@finabo.abo.fi (Timo B{ckman TF)
Subject: Scuderia Italia
Organization: Abo Akademi University, Finland
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 06:55:32 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.23


Michele Alboreto and Luca Badoer have been announce as drivers for the 
Scuderia Italia team for 1993. It's going to be Alboreto's last year
in F1 and Badoer's first. Scuderia Italia is again an all italian team.

Timo Backman
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport