HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: The right to rape.
Date: 22 Jan 93 11:27:29 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan22.044435.7705@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>>: In article <1993Jan18.200357.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>: 
>>: >Women have to stay home, to cook for the family, to take 
>>: >care of husband. And if the husband is angry, they have to 
>>: >shut up. And if they don't, they have to wait to be hit. 
> 
> Every time, you tell me that I'm cold, michele, or that you do not hate women.
> I want you to remember this statement you made.

Such a loser. So I *did* hurt you telling that you are 
cold. So I was right.

You wanna show to women, in alt.flame, that you are the 
Cavalier with the white horse and the sparking sword ready 
to die to save them from the Dragon (me). I can burn you, 
remember.
> 
> Hoisted once again on your own petard.

I give you another petard, "man", for your happiness:

Woman are nothing but sex-machines. Every man has the right 
to fuck, it is a biological need. If a guy "rape" them HE IS 
RIGHT! HE DID BECAUSE THOSE BITCHIES ARE ONLY LOOKING FOR 
GUYS WITH MONEY, HANDSOME! And what about the poor ugly guys, 
like you and Martin that can't fuck just because women don't 
want them?!? There are not rapes on the world, it is only a 
women invention. They are not the owner of their pussy, *we* 
are. They have just to shut up and to wait to be fucked, and 
to be HAPPY TO DO IT! 
That's it.
> 
> jason, pres. the collective

	Michele
  President of association "The right to Rape".

P.S.	Deal with it, moron. We are in alt.flame, and I 
	wrote a *flame*.

P.P.S.	I flame, so I am hot (opposite of cold). What about you?
Xref: sparky alt.flame:18934 soc.singles:37359
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Burger King (was Re: One whopper of a flame war on the )
Summary: Dog meat burgers anyone?
Date: 21 Jan 93 17:03:35 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1993Jan20.202807.28284@netcom.com> desiree@netcom.com (dmc) writes:
>>If you were in my back yard a certain canine would have your ass in his 
>>mouth.

>        Goodie, thanks for the input.  I'll make doubly sure now not
>to hop your fence unarmed.  Of course, though, that since the doggie
>is in the back yard, that leaves the front door unprotected..

>>>        Scary, huh?
>>Interesting picture, huh?  :-D

>        Yea.  Doggie burgers a midnight on the weber.  Could be fun.
>Could be a happening.  How you like yours?

Well done <sic>

>Desiree
 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:01:37 GMT
Subject: Re: Is that REALLY Tony? - NO!
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

Michele,

You are such a *moron* little boy. You try to *flame* me but you
cannot. So *that*.

You *must* apologize now for making the fun joke. I cannot belive you
think you can put the fire on me little frou-frou.

You are the *dog* of Liz. You think that you can take the flames, but
you cannot.

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! You are not even the *REAL* Italian man. HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA?!?!?!?

MOANA, my little love, can you belive this *asshole*?!?!?!  You are
mine, little one.  You know *I* am the real man for you.


*So that!*


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: jeff tries again
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:23:03 GMT


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: <None>
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:04:14 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.155403.17997@tdb.uu.se>, t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:

> Speak to Hannigan, asshole. He's at your level,
> and might care.

So far Par-Zero, you have done nothing but criticize others for not throwing
the proper punch, saying the proper phrase, or repeating to many words. And
yourself? How abouts ya stop playing the critic and jump into the fray. No one
likes the spectator at the game who happens to know everything there is to
know. Of course, we're just not at your level, eh Par? You care so little, and
yet... you continue to followup. Chose a side, or get out of the way.

"You resist... yet your Soul Obeys!"

--The Phantom
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: THE REAGAN ERA IS OVER
Date: 21 Jan 93 00:15:41 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1993Jan20.231245.977@chpc.utexas.edu> zippy@chpc.utexas.edu (Jack Lund) writes:
>I couldn't help it. 

Methinks you cannot help a lot of things.

>In article <exuptr.691.0@exu.ericsson.se> exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a 
la 400ci) writes:>>

>>This reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw today.  It said:
>>"I'd rather sleep with Bill Clinton than vote for George Bush."
>>
>>Now if this homo (yes it was a man driving the car) had been fucking Bill 
>             ^^^^
>And then he has the temerity to quote, in his *.sig* no less:

I don't feel it's out of bounds at all.  If the guy cares to display his 
immorality (Bill Clinton is married if you hadn't noticed, O observant one) 
in public, then I don't  think it is prejudice to respond to what is 
obviously a flip treatment of the subject.

>> ObQuotes:
>> "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
>> "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

>D'ya ever think they might be talking about *you*, oh clueless one?? HMMM???

Sure, I've thought about it.  Which puts me one step ahead of you.  See, 
prejudice is not about never speaking out against something.  It's about 
judging before you see the evidence.

In this case the evidence was quite present.

>Nah, I didn't think so. :-}

In your case also.  Knee-jerk reaction from a knee-jerk jerk.


 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim)
Subject: Re: This place is getting boring.
 
Reply-To: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:47:50 GMT

In article 1jmb7cINNgs1@chester.ksu.ksu.edu, cress@chester.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress) writes:
>
>>[Jim's description of Andy's polypness deleted]
>
>Come to think of it, you *do* post to alt.tasteless on a regular
>basis don't you.
>

Aye, tis true.  Oft when moon wanes in yonder dark sky, my putrifying carcass
can be seen stalking through the wastelands of Internet, leaving festering
slivers of flesh behind for all to enjoy at their leisure.  The maggots of my
mind writhe in teeming masses on the fetid substance of my posts, the pungent
odour of my text pervades through the ether like a fart through old jeans.

And it's still more interesting than Witty or Graley's foul whinging.

>Garrett
>

Jim.
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: <SNIFF> JORN LIVES
Keywords: fartbag, baltic pollution, norwegian leper
Date: 20 Jan 93 21:35:10 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <C14w2t.81D@world.std.com> martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:
>Jorn would probably be rescued by a Viking with a gerble up his ass and stick
>Jorn up there to finish the job.

>Jorn might be rescued by a boatload of homosexual Phillipine fisherman.
>They would throw him back because they would'nt want Dall'Agattas seconds.

>Jorn might be rescued by The Navy, but they too would throw him back because
>of the bruises on his ass and his story about the homosexual fisherman.

>Jorn is a useless and moraless human thing, noone wants him and therfore 
>noone would rescue him (except Dall'Agatta) and we are back to shit floating.

Do whales eat floating shit?

 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Blinded by love; Jism and J S Graley
Date: 23 Jan 93 14:21:56 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan22.151723.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> In article <1jp9ptINNcf1@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
> 
>> I suggest the least embarissing thing for you to do is SHUT THE FUCK UP
>> and PISS OFF.
> 
> I suggest that you re-learn the proper spelling of "embarrassing", not that I
> am one to judge, and then TOSS OFF.

Right. You are nothing, how could you be "one to judge"? 
Maybe if you judge yourself you can find something interesting.
Tell us, we can have fun of you...
> 
> --The Phantom

	Michele
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: THE REAGAN ERA IS OVER, THE END IS NEAR!
Date: 21 Jan 93 20:09:49 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1993Jan21.140001.21891@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

>twitty, you idiot. where in this paragraph did i express support for
>clinton? in fact, where in my post did i MENTION clinton? i dont like
>clinton that much, i just DESPISED george bush; i would have voted
>for Mussolini over that wormy little fucker. 

Oh, that's a nice piece.  Mussolini?  So are you *for* Slick Willie, or are 
you a Perot supporter?

>ps do you expect ANY politican to fix things? get real.

Ok, now you're making *some* sense.
 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: Apology
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:58:01 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

(JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes:
>
>Sorry, forgot my .sig. I'm terribly sorry. Honestly.
>
>Did you get high hopes Andy ?
>
[ JORN's over-compensating for his lack of masculinity .sig deleted ]


I have only high hopes that during your vacation you will be inadvertently
sucked into a compost mulching machine where your otherwise useless carcass
will be shredded into spaghetti fine strands and spread over a large area
of Norwegian turf, there to at last serve some useful purpose in the 
great scheme of things.

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: John G. Robinson <robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: A Day in the life of: Rob Dobson
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 18:46:32 GMT

In article <1409@dsbc.icl.co.uk> Kevin Walsh, kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.165919.19381@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> 
>rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>> 
>> mildly amusing, shitty, but unlike you and rouse i have a FULL
TIME JOB
>> and am not a baby undergrad. try again next time.
>>
>You have a full time job eh?  Posting from virginia.edu eh?
>So, what do you do at virginia.edu?  I suppose you are another
>of those toilet-cleaner types like Michelle.
>
>What full time job could YOU have at a university?
>

Why, all he'd have to do is cross the briny to that floating turd
they call england and he could land a job as a "professor" just
like you did.  God knows the job requirements can't be that tough
if they'd take on a compulsive masturbator such as yourself.

>-- 
>   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
>  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor
Kevin Walsh
> _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/     
kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
>_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/      
kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk

Nice .sig, prof.
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Brooklin, Sphincter for NY
Date: 27 Jan 93 00:31:29 GMT
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.


So hey ahhh motin, you live in bwooklin or wut? 
I went by bwooklin wunse and its a nwice place to visit bwut dey all 
tawlk so funny, it was hod to unustands em. 

Once, dis cop sez to me, he sez, hey you, when is yous gonna get yous
boat outas heah?

And I sez ta hims, I sez "Fo What?" 

Well, doze bwooklin cops, dey dont like it too much when yous tawlk back
ats ems, so he hit me on da head wid 'is nightstick.  

I hate when dey doos dat. 

So I figya yous can jus' keep yous fukin' ass derr in bwooklin cuz 
nowun else is stoopid enuf ta lib dea.

Fukin dweeb.
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Fuck the women-macho flame, I am tired of that.
Date: 22 Jan 93 04:19:13 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1993Jan21.160616.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.211538.2128@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>, Mark B. writes:
>> In article <1993Jan20.130619.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>>
>I am fucking serious, unfortunately.
It certainly is unfortunate for the rest of us.


>I mean, what I wrote was just bullshit
Oh really!  Thanks for the tip.  ***note the oozing sarcasm***

>
>I thought about that. No, my point is that the macho flame 
>is terrible, you start kidding and always it ends that the 
>people hate each other. 

Ah yes!!  Michele Dallagata, spreader of goodwill and equality!  Bringer of 
good feelings!  He would never do anything hateful in alt.flame, he's just
too damn *snif* super!

And I don't like to see a woman 
>angry with me only because I said bullshit. 

THE RESPONSE MICHELE WANTED IN ALT.FLAME:

"Hey, michele, I just wanted to post to you, man, and tell you that that was
some good bullshit you were spouting.  Yes sir!  When it comes to kicking
manure you sure are the man!  Keep it up!  We loooooove you! :)"

Michele, if you don't want people to be angry with you, why are you here?
Why don't you go to alt.romance.chat or something?

>"I don't belive that there is any rape on this world. It is 
>just you, women, that are made to be fucked by us, it is the 
>only job that you can do. All of you are whores".

You know what??  In your ongoing argument with me, this statement more or less
captures the essence of your beliefs.  Thank you for so neatly encapsulating
it for me.
>
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: The ghost of a little dog.
Date: 27 Jan 93 02:37:38 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1993Jan24.190529.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
> In article <1993Jan24.163528.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>> In article <1993Jan24.031250.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
 
>>> Here, 25 cents for a bone.
>> 
>> More proof about Michele's sexual orientation. Michele, I wouldn't take your ,
>> or any other male's (so sit down Rob), "bone" for all the money in the world.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!
> 
> Hey, little ghost! but what the fuck are you saying?!? 

He's saying your a faggot. Faggot.

<                                                        My 
> dictionary says that a bone is a bone, 

Your LITTLE DICKtionary is incomplete. "Bone"  is American slang for
"Boner" or "Penis". Your a complete dumb fuck. 

>                                        You know, the things that 
> you used to eat when you were the dog of Liz, 

Weak. A "Bone" is something you suck when you were the lover of Graley.
What a I saying? My fault, you still are Graley's bed warmer.

>                                               with the meat 
> attached to it and ... BHAHAHA. 

Of course meat. The meatier the dick, the thicker the "boner"!

>                                 In few words, food for dogs.

Actually girls. In your case, food for your homosexual friends.

> 
>> Don't try to buy your men on the Net okay?
> 
> Am I in a bad mood, or you are saying crap?

Nope, he's saying for you to switch to Alt.homosexual when you start looking
for companionship. Pink boy.
>> 
>> --The Phantom
> 	
> 	Michele

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim)
Subject: Re: AN-AN-AN-AN-AN-AN-AN!
 
Reply-To: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:38:41 GMT

In article 14182@bsu-ucs, 01w0yang@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu () writes:
>LISTEN YOU.
>
>I TAKING OVER ALT.FLAME! AN-AN-AN-AN-AN-AN-AN!
>YOU ALL CAN GO HOME WITH CRAP FLAMES. GO NOW. I HERE TO STAY FOR WHILE.
>
>WING YANG
>JAPANESE SUPREME RULER OF ALT.FLAME


Well, you've impressed me already, you moronic little fool.  Honestly,
some imbeciles try *anything* to butt into the group!

Also, we now have yet another asshole who wants to be "king" flamer
but who can't even write properly.  What a prize divot!

I laugh at your pathetic and feeble attempt, gang-bang-wang-yang.

Jim.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: an6594@anon.penet.fi
Subject: Jeff Twitty
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: alt.flame
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:20:00 GMT

To J. Twitty Army ROTC ("Proud Soldier..........")
       MISTER Twitty. Since when does an ROTC 2LT wannabe qualify as a "soldier"       anywhere? Your a godamned 'cruit pussy who knows nothing.. NOTHING..
       about being a soldier. ROTC does not teach you to be a warrior. I saw
       numerous pseudo-patriotic newbie officer types fuck-up in Saudi as to
       make me fucking puke. In takes more than an American flag in one hand
       and a hard-on for Ronald Reagan to survive in a shitstorm of burning
       diesel fuel, immolated flesh, sand, sweat, and fear. Not to mention
       incoming artillery rounds---most of which were our own, called in by
       know nothing 'cruit Lieutenants like you might be someday--and you're
       not even that far yet. I cleared in  June '91. An E-6. Your fucking
       savior if you ever get to a real unit; do you think your Republican
       Finishing School (ROTC) will teach you one piece of what you need to
       know? It won't, shithead, it won't. If you think you can dismiss my
       opinions, you're wrong. I have been highly decorated. I served 
       honorably and was discharged honorably. I have more respect among the
       rank and file than you will ever know...or understand. So if you ever
       get your commission and you are driving around in your Hummvee in
       Grafenwoehr, Germany in the middle of the night and its fucking
       freezing and you realize you never learned how to really read a map
      ...watch your back. Or swallow your bullshit, Salute the Flag, spit-
      shined pride and ask someone to teach you correctly. It may prevent
      your being fragged someday.         fmr. SSG Spencer  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: Hamper: Spaghetti-O's!!!!
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:46:34 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>Hello?
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n

Hi.  Have you been down for maintenance?

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Keywords: O-> !@#$%#!! +-O
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:21:00 GMT

andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:

>(Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>>andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>
>>>By the way... if you don't think you can buy a woman, then you're not
>>>living in the real world.  Buy love?  Probably not.  Buy a woman? 
>>>No problem.  Most are for sale.
>>The fact that you think most women are for sale says more about your
>>social life than it does about women in general.
>>
>>[stuff deleted]
>>
>>Katherine Merle Mason

>And your insistence that they are NOT says much about your complete
>and total schism from reality.  Just exactly what do you deduce about 
>my social life from this quote?

Did I insist that most women are not for sale.  I am not most women, so
I cannot speak for them.  You could not set a price high enough to 
buy me, or almost anyone I know.  This, I suppose says something about
the people I know.  The fact that you can buy (and I don't doubt that
you can) most women you have run into, says something about where you
are running.  Or that you are so sure perhaps says something about
you having bought many women.  Perhaps you couldn't find any that were
interested.

>Exhibit One:  "It's just as easy to fall in love
>	       with a rich man as a poor one."

>What, then, is the basis for this old saying?

>While it may be true that once some sort of bonding has taken place a 
>woman might tolerate a lack of material wealth, it is certainly not true
>in initial encounters.

>Now, Kate, let me just say most men and women are alike in that we seek
>some imaginary combination of characteristics that we believe an *ideal* 
>mate to possess.

Kate, huh?  Okay, whatever you say Andrew.

>I am simply saying that women were socialized throughout our history to 
>seek men who would be good providers.  While this situation may be changing,
>there is still plenty of residue of this attitude left over in women's 
>attitudes today.

>In general, I find women to be more materialistic.  Are you saying this
>is not true?

No.  I cannot confirm or deny what is true about the woman you know.  All
I can say is that you must know some pretty sleezy women.  No wonder
you were discussing the emotional results of being dumped with Liz.
I wish you better luck in the future.

.
>-- Andy 

Happy Chinese New Year,

KMM
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 03:51:01 GMT

liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
->rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) 
->>I notice, however, that the lack of interesting material certainly
->>doesn't stop you from your usual brand of incredibly insipid bleat-
->>ings, Liz, dear.  

->And your proof is?  

each of your posts. it must be quite embarassing for
you.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: m92mmy@tdb.uu.se (Mattias Myrberg)
Subject: LinesIII
Organization: His Own Place
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 03:49:36 GMT


He he, cross your fingers again...


/Mattias

_____
Mattias Myrberg

m92mmy@bellatrix.tdb.uu.se