From: mcollins@nyx.cs.du.edu (Killans - First And Last And Always)
Subject: Re: Any opinions on the CD singles...?
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 17:49:48 GMT

In article <1993Jan6.082724.28286@csus.edu> roy@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu (Roy J.) writes:
>In article <1993Jan4.191515.8296@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> rchabot@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Robert J Chabot) writes:
>>
>>Yo Metallikatz!
>>
>>Anybody have an opinion on the CD singles that have been released along with 
>>the black album?
>
>As you said, the cover songs are great.  But I'm really getting annoyed
>by the multitudes of singles which are being released from this album.  Did
>they have to release two versions of the Wherever I May Roam cd single?
>They could have easily combined the tracks onto one single, but IMO
>success has turned Metallica into a bunch of money-grubbing bastards.  You
>might say that the record company is more at fault but how come there are so
>few singles from the other albums (back in the good old days when Metallica
>didn't give a shit about singles & videos)?  If Metallica still cared
>about the fans, I'm sure they would have released all the recent covers
>on a Garage Days-type ep, rather than try to rip everyone off with tons
>of singles and import cd's only available in other countries.  Come to
>think about it, I bet they will release such an ep or collection in
>order to make more money.  And of course, as the avid Metallica
>collecter that I am, I'll have to dish out the bucks so that my
>collection won't be incomplete.  Sigh...
>
I'd still give Metallica the benefit of the doubt and say the record company's
to blame probably (all though I'm sure the band aren't complaining all that
much). As singles sales decline (which is true here in the UK and, I presume, in
the US), companies look for more and more gimmicks to keep singles sales afloat.
The gimmick of releasing 2 or more versions of the same CD single with different
B-sides seems to have been adopted quite recently by a *lot* of record 
companies. And bear in mind that 'Metallica' has been a greater commercial
success than other albums (whatever you think of it) and I'm sure the record
companies are just itching to milk the success for all it's worth. 

The earlier albums didn't have loads of singles taken off them because most
of them (up to and including Master of Puppets unless I'm mistaken) were on
smaller, independent labels, which generally don't go in for cynical marketing
ploys - another clue that it may be the company rather than the band. And
anyway, most of the songs off earlier albums weren't exactly chart fodder...

And anyway, think of the poor bastards like me who can't even afford a CD 
player, nor CDs to play on them (nor albums in any other format at the moment
but hopefully that's a temporary problem). Now *we're* the ones who are 
really getting screwed over by the record companies.

Mike

Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.metal.metallica