From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: An argument for better sex ed
Organization: Gizmonic Institute - Home of the "Big G Burger"
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 00:46:32 GMT

<1993Jan9.073419.21882@noao.edu> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) :
>From article by gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga):
>> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) said:
>>>From article by patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey):
>>>> Is that so?  I've been here as long as you have, and strangely enough, I
>>>> haven't seen any such activity -- 
>>>
>>>We all know you're blind as a bat.  Just look at what you married.
>> 
>> Crude, Suzanne.  Have you ever "looked" at Patrick's wife?  
>
>Of course not - that was the point.  None of us have, which renders
>the statement absurd.  Even if nobody else appreciates it, _I_ had a good
>laugh! :-)   Notice I never actually insulted his wife.

I have no doubt you had a good laugh.  As for denying your insulting
intention...  well, I'm not claiming to read your mind, but it seemed
pretty clear to me what you were inferring.

>> Are you
>> implying that she is a lesbian who got herself pregnant by the "teaspoon
>> method"
>
>Never occured to me actually.  But a clever twist.

Well, if it was clever I can see why it didn't occur to you.

>>>> Or are you saying you
>>>> really think Heather got herself pregnant?  (That *is* a neat trick, if she
>>>> really did that.)
>>>> 
>>>> --PLH, I don't think that's how Dale's daughter got here, though...
>>>
>>>Yeah.   She ain't yours.   She's another man's, a man who's been with your
>>>wife.   
>> 
>> Are you saying that children are just property that are owned by their
>> biological parents?  Are you saying that people who adopt are never really
>> the parents of the child and should not be respected as such?
>
>Not at all.

But you are saying that his wife's daughter belongs to another man
apparently because Patrick is not the biological father.

>>>        I hope it drives you crazy.
>> 
>> How loving.  How Christian.  You actually hope that a man who marries a
>> divorced woman would be driven crazy by memories of her ex-husband.  Is
>> this what your "real" Christianity teaches you?
>
>I think it pretty silly that so many people are so upset by someone simply
>exposing the downside of such common life situations nowadays.   If it
>_didn't_ bother Patrick, he wouldn't have a human heart in him.   Try
>reading Hosea.

Try reading what you wrote - You are hoping it drives him crazy.  You are
saying, "Gee, and it probably bothers you too."  I wouldn't really care
about insults except you set yourself up to be this caring Catholic
Christian yet I see you wishing unhappiness on someone because he can't
be the father to his wife's daughter.  That doesn't sound very caring to
me.  In fact it sounds very hypocritcal of you.


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel, 
Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), Diana (Sorceress), Beth 
"CJ", and Nadja, and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it.
[space reserved for alternate ex-girlfriends Eric R. and Drieux]
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion