HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: heiser@acs.bu.edu (William Heiser)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hayes lawyers intimidate competition (was: Hayes Press Release)
Date: 3 Jan 93 02:37:58 GMT
Organization: Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1993Jan3.005420.11231@netcom.com> marquis@netcom.com (Roger Marquis) writes:
>
>modems are priced substantially higher than the competition's similarly 
>featured products.

Do you really think this is true?  I am evaluating a Hayes Optima 144+
FAX 144, and it seem to me that it is a better buy than the others in
its class (Telebit T3000, USR V.32bis).  I'm not sure of the price of the
USR, but I am quite sure the price of the T3000, and the T3000 doesn't
even have FAX capability yet.  Also the Optima is one of the few I've
seen that does FAX at 14.4K (although of course this is of little use
if other FAXes don't do the same :-).

I will say, though, that the software bundled with the Hayes
is PITIFUL.  Horrible horrible horrible!
From: reginald.hirsch@yob.sccsi.com (Reginald Hirsch) 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZYXEL NEW ROM
Date: 21 Dec 92 13:13:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Ye Olde Bailey BBS - Houston, TX - 713-520-1569
Reply-To: reginald.hirsch@yob.sccsi.com (Reginald Hirsch) 

TO: Zero_One@p101.f701.n202.z1.fidonet.org
  Tyrone in setting up my Zyxel U 1496S+ I am confused as to turning
MNP 5 off leaving V.42bis and MNP4 on.I understand I can set S38.5=1
from a command line initialization.My question is from the display
screen since the S register only shows S38= what is the variable in the
display since .5 is not recognized.Thanks
                      
----
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ye Olde Bailey BBS   713-520-1569 (V.32bis) 713-520-9566 (V.32bis)     |
|   Houston,Texas          yob.sccsi.com       Home of alt.cosuard       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: milo!sswiss@plains.NoDak.edu (Steve Swiss)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL Fax Problems
Date: 2 Jan 1993 14:18:19 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

I recently recieved and setup a ZyXEL U-1496E under the sysop program
and have been very happy with it, almost. I set it up under FrontDoor
2.02/NC and Maximus 2.01wb, it works great for mail and as a data modem,
but I have had problems with the fax recieve. I set it up almost exactly
as shown in the document on ZyXEL's BBS called ZYXEL202.EXE. What
happens is the modem answers, connects, the mailer drops out with
the proper errorlevel and RCVFAX seems to recieve the fax, although
the filename of the fax and the fax speed are not shown, but no file
and nothing is printed and the log shows as below. I am using ZFAX 2.1 
dated 22SEP92. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am told our mailer
is buggy, so mail may bounce to sswiss@milo.nodak.edu, use 
sswiss%milo@plains.nodak.edu or just post here, I regularily read this
newsgroup.
 
RCVFAX command line: RCVFAX 2 /p:1 /w:c:\zfax\in
 
Setup on COM2 with a 16550AFN UART
 
RCVFAX.LOG:
 
  DATE   TIME    FILE      REMOTE FAX NUMBER     SPEED
 
12-31-92 11:26 ?????.000
12-31-92 13:29 ?????.000
01-02-93 11:45 ?????.000
01-02-93 12:24 ?????.000
 
FrontDoor INIT strings: INIT-1: ATZ4|
                        INIT-2: ATM0&Y0X7S38=32S11=50#B1+FCLASS=6|
 
Current configuration:
 
ATI0
U1496E  V 5.04f M
 
OK
AT&V
 
Current   Settings............
 
 B0   E1   L4   M0   N5   Q0   V1   X7
&B1  &C1  &D2  &G0  &H3  &J0  &K4  &L0  &M0  &N0  &P0  &R1  &S0  &X0  &Y0
*B0  *C0  *D0  *E0  *F0  *G0  *I0  *L0  *M0  *P9  *Q2  *S0
 
S00=000   S01=000   S02=043   S03=013   S04=010
S05=008   S06=003   S07=060   S08=002   S09=006
S10=007   S11=050   S12=000   S13=000   S14=002
S15=130   S16=000   S17=018   S18=000   S19=000
S20=002   S21=176   S22=000   S23=121   S24=138
S25=000   S26=000   S27=156   S28=064   S29=000
S30=000   S31=017   S32=019   S33=000   S34=030
S35=000   S36=000   S37=000   S38=032   S39=000
S40=000   S41=000   S42=000   S43=000   S44=000
S45=100   S46=028   S47=000   S48=000   S49=000
 
OK
 
Steve Swiss
Sysop, The Blazing Icicle BBS   Minot, ND    ND-Net: 32:201/0 (RC)
ZyXEL U-1496E modem at 16.8k BPS    Specializing in Communications
Internet: sswiss@milo.nodak.edu  or  sswiss%milo@plains.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith)
Subject: Re: HELP! problems with 2-line phones
Organization: Keith's Computer, Hope Mills, NC
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 21:02:53 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.003824.2898@combdyn.com> lawrence@combdyn.com (Lawrence Chen) writes:
>>not dropped when the other line rings.  I have tried each phone
>>individually and they all seem to cause line noise on the other line
>>(line2) when line1 rings.  These phones are essential and I was
>>wondering if there was some way to suppress this overlapping effect.
>>

Yep.  If you DON'T get noise with the other phones disconnected I would
suggest that you route the modem number thru a knockout switch at your
modem site.  Run 2 pair from your CO to the modem site and hook up a
DPDT switch like this:



+------+To All Your Other Extensions
|      |-----------------------------+
| Phone|-------------------------o   o 
| Box  |
|      |                          /   /
|      |-------------------------o   o
|      |-----------------------------+
+------+From the Phone Co.
                                 o   o------ To Your Modem
                                 +----------

Then Simply throw the switch to your modem before you use it. 
Alternately you can make a forked RJ-11 connector, and skip the switch,
but this would require a decent modem, and one that stayed plugged in
all the time.  The Modem must have a RELAY that DISCONNECTS it's phone
plug once the modem is active on a connection.  Most of the decent ones
do. (Easy to test.  Pick up a phone connected to the phone jack in the
back of your modem while connected somethere,  The phone should be
dead.):



+------+From the Phone Company Line
|      |----------------------------- Modem Line/Telco
|Telco |-----------------------------    Jack Pins 2/3
|Box   |
|      |
|      |Back for the Ext phones
|      |----------------------------- Modem Phone/Ext
|      |-----------------------------   Jack Pins 2/3
+------+


A halfway competent phone cable jock could do this in about 15 minutes
assuming your House wireing is a spider web from the CO box, and not a
string.  If you didn't mind running another wire, you could even get
creative with 4 pair and knock the extension phones off either line (via
switch) and use either line for the modem.  This would surely be cheaper
than a dedicated phone NUMBER and wire.

NOTE:  This is also what I do at MY house, and I have 2 line phones
everywhere too!
-- 
Keith Smith          uunet!ksmith!keith            5719 Archer Rd.
Digital Designs      BBS 1-919-423-4216            Hope Mills, NC 28348-2201
Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Hayes Press Release: Appals Court Upholds Escape Sequence Patent
Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 02:38:32 GMT

I wonder how Mr Hayes father would feel about his family name being
synonymous with litigous scum.  I seem to remember from an interview
with Hayes that his old dad said "Remember, it's the family name you're
putting on your company, not just your own..."

G
From: claude@bauv.unibw-muenchen.de (Claude Frantz (RZ))
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Motorola 326XFAST
Date: 30 Dec 92 07:09:21 GMT
Organization: University of the armed forces, Munich
NNTP-Posting-Host: bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de

Hello !

Can you give me information about the internals of this modem serie.
Which modulation is used ? Which chips ? How is it possible to get
such a high speed on the switched telephone network ?

Thanx in advance

Claude
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: WB Fax Upgrade
Date: 2 Jan 93 20:46:12 GMT
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)

duncan@ravel.ati.com (Jim Duncan) writes:
>
>Yesterday I received the fax/ROM upgrades for my Worldblazer. The kit
>basically adds fax capability and provides the latest v. 7.01 ROM's.
>
>Over the weekend I plan to install the new parts, but the outstanding,
>overriding bummer in the whole project is that the (presently) required
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>FAXIMUM software in the UNIX environment costs about $625 - they so
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>graciously give you a 10% discount off the $695 regular price. This is
>very unacceptable.  
>

Faximum is not "required" software.  It's simply the only Unix package that
Telebit has been able to adequately test, and therefore the only package
that Telebit promises will work.

Other packages that support the same command set (I don't have the number
of the document at home) should work also.  It's just that Telebit doesn't
know at this point which ones will and which ones won't.

  -Greg
(Telebit Engineer)
-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObGuindon:  "Hi!  I'm Bob and I need someone to talk to because I've just
            finished this week's People magazine and my mind is racing."
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: My Individual Private Site
Subject: Re: ZyXEL - NO DIALTONE
Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.10 Rev. Dec 18 1992
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 00:15:06 CET
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In <T5u8VB4w165w@zswamp.UUCP>, Geoffrey Welsh writes:

>    ATX3 should get you around the problem by disabling dialtone detection.

However, dial tone recognition works flawlessly in Germany. Since the
original poster didn't mention a PBX, it could very well be a hardware
problem.

Somebody mentioned the possibility that the jacks were switched. If
that's not the case, I'd recommend asking the dealer for advice, as I'd
suspect that the modem is simply defect.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber, Germany           naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Subject: Re: Prodigy Eagle Modem (Retraction)
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 19:54:58 GMT

Colonel Panic (aland@informix.com) wrote:
: OK, so... now that V.32bis is verified, in what ways does the Eagle differ
: from the Scout, feature-wise?    Wolfgang?

Both modems are based on the MDK-100 modem design kit from Digicom and
the Digicom V.32bis chipset, which is based on the Analog Devices 2101
DSP family. So they have many features in common. The factory register
defaults are quite a bit different, though, since the intention was to
make the Eagle easily compatible with the Prodigy service. 

The Eagle is only available to Prodigy members and is made available
for a limited time in connection with Prodigy's recent introduction of
9600 bps service (for a flat rate of $16.95/month). From what I can
tell, Prodigy was clever to decide on the Eagle since its a good match
with their longer term strategy.

The Scout+ is and remains Digicom's flagship modem and thus you can
expect it to be around for a long time, with innovations like
voice-mail, switching between voice/fax/data, a real Class 2.0 fax
interface and others planned. The MacIntosh package currently available
for the Scout+ supports fax/voice switching for example. I am not so
sure about Caller ID in the near future, since Pac*Bell e.g. has just
decided not to make this service available. Digicom tends to stick to
those features which are useful to many users. Since its an engineering
driven company which owns the DSP source code in their modem chipsets, 
they are quite flexible in this regard.


-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data lanes not car pool lanes      wolfgang@netcom.com 

Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:18522 comp.dcom.isdn:1044
From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.dcom.isdn
Organization: My Individual Private Site
Subject: V.42bis over V.120? (was Re: Can V.32bis or V.42bis be 'faked' by
Followup-To: comp.dcom.isdn
Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.10 Rev. Dec 18 1992
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 23:50:44 CET
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In <724673882.AA00673@cswamp.apana.org.au>, Arthur Marsh writes:

> V.42bis requires BTLZ data compression, plus LAPM or V.120 (or
> both) error correction, and V.42 requires both LAPM *and* MNP 4

Is V.42bis already defined by the CCITT for use over V.120? I though it
was still in the "we're looking into it" stage, which can turn out
anything.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber, Germany           naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
From: RAF@CU.NIH.GOV ("Roger Fajman")
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re:  'Ring Ring' and No Ans...on BBS Problem
Date: 26 Dec 92 18:45:18 GMT
Organization: The Internet

>   I am planning to set up a 8 line BBS, The phone company has a service
> which will let us to advertise one number and the call   would me routed
> to the next free phone line.  But, we  as modem users we face a simple
> problem, what happens if the modem does not work or the system that has the
> modem go   down. If this happens then there would be "ring ring" and no
> ans...

I use something that is called "Uniform Call Distribution" by C&P
Telephone.  The hunt for an available line starts with the line
following the one that the last call came in on, whether it was
answered or not.  It wraps around at the end, of course.  It's only
available with Centrex here, but the tariffs are such that that is not
a major problem.

Roger Fajman                                   Telephone:  +1 301 402 1246
National Institutes of Health                  BITNET:     RAF@NIHCU
Bethesda, Maryland, USA                        Internet:   RAF@CU.NIH.GOV

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: spyder@admiral.uucp (Eric)
Subject: PPI modems...
Reply-To: spyder@admiral.uucp (Eric)
Organization: The Grid/Waffle BBS, 203-661-2873, -1279, -0450, -2967
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 04:01:39 GMT

Does any sysop out there actually have a PPI modem that works as well
as your old 2400?...problem-free?...This is my second PPI 14.4FXSA
and its even worse than the last one...this time, I can't handshake
and negotiate with anyone like last time, and my board gets killed 
because
the modem can't identify when people hangup on it, so it won't drop
carrier...but this time, the LCD screen was installed incorrectly, so
I can't read the two two pixel lines of the display....this is a
disgrace....I really wish I had had enough money to buy a USR modem..
1.15M, 1.21, what's the difference?...my modem is just plain bad...
I
've already tried both chips....the modem quality is just really horrible
and unless you have ideal conditions, (optical line, and only calling 
other PPI's), the modem stinks.

--
spyder%admiral.uucp@yale.edu (Eric) <yale!admiral!spyder>
The Admiral's Public UNIX - Greenwich, CT - System Administrator: Doug Fields
(HST/V32) (203)661-2873 -- (PEP/V32) -1279 -- (V32) -0450 -- (V29/MNP6) -2967
>FREE!< Unix shell accounts, Usenet access, and Internet-style mail available
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: dvv@hq.demos.su (Dima Volodin)
Subject: V.42 window?
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 21:24:57 GMT
Organization: DEMOS Coop., Moscow, Russia
Keywords: V.42 SLIP ZyXEL WorldBlazer

Is there such thing as V.42 window and if yes, then what are corresponding
sizes for WorldBlazer and ZyXEL?

Thanks to all,


Dima

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gregh@hprnd.rose.hp.com (Greg Holdren)
Subject: Re: BAUD RATE GENERATORS
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 19:42:26 GMT
Organization: HP - Systems Technology Division
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]

In article <7521.48.uupcb@uttsbbs.uucp> you wrote:
: Does anyone know how to construct an external baud rate generator for
: the Apple Super Serial Card?
:         - brandon lacava
:
 Couln't email directly, mail bounces.

 The 8116 baud rate generator hip work fine, I use them alot.
 Its a 18 pin device. Hang a 4.915200MHz or a 5.068800MHz crystal
 of it with a dip switch and its done, easy. The out put is 16x
 the desired baud rate. The parts can be ordered through Jameco
 in Belmont CA. 1-800-831-4242.
 Any questions just ask.


 Greg Holdren
 gregh@hprnd.rose.hp.com



Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: quix@panix.com (George Papadopoulos)
Subject: Cheapest Price for USR Dual Std?
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 06:33:52 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC

Can someone tell me where the cheapest place to get a US Robotics Dual
Standard Modem is? Also, could someone outline the different models?
For instance is there one model that only handles 14.4 and another that 
handles 16.8 & FAX? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

George 
quix@panix.com
From: wkrause@kaa.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Wolfgang Krause)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL as answering machine ? (PC-Software)
Date: 28 Dec 92 14:29:22 GMT
Organization: Rechnerbetrieb Informatik - RWTH Aachen
NNTP-Posting-Host: kaa.informatik.rwth-aachen.de
Keywords: Zyxel

Hi !
After upgrading my ZyXEL modem to 5.02 ROMs, I learned, that the new 
ROM versions contain a voice mode, that digitizes sounds from the
phoneline.
So I FTPed the latest version of ZFAX (I think its 2.1). While the package
contains quite a lot of docs about the voice-features, ZFAX itself is
a lousy answering machine (cannot set silence sensitivity, no skipping
of messages, no remote changing of outgoing message, etc.).

Dont get me wrong here. While ZFAX probably is quite o.k. for receiving faxes,
the voice features are rather modest, compared to what the ZyXEL COULD DO.

I was thinking about the following features:
- everything a decent telephone answering machine can do
- timestamping of messages
- personal voice-mail
- voice menus (like most companies seem to have these days)
- FastFaxts-like features (select a document and get it faxed to you)
- automatic message forwarding (program the number, where you can be
  reached and let the modem forward messages to that number). Same thing
  could work for faxes !
- send timed voice (bulk-)messages (New Year Greetings etc...)
- Anthing else you can do/operate with a TouchTone phone and a Fax-machine
 
Hmmm. Ok. Some of these ideas are a bit over the top, but IMHO all of
these things CAN BE implemented with litte software on the PC-side, since
most is already handled within the modem.

Since at least some of these ideas are obvious, I would think, that someone
has already written some PC software in that direction. If so, could
someone please tell me, where to find it, otherwise, I might just start
writting some code.

Thanks for any hint. If I find/get any info, I will post !

HAPPY NEW YEAR!
     Wolfgang.
---
============================================================================
! WOLFGANG     !      E-MAIL: wkrause@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de       !
!      KRAUSE  !  SNAIL-MAIL: Langweilerstr.1, D-W5173 Aldenhoven, Germany !
!              !       Phone: (voice) ++49 2464 5227 (fax) ++49 2464 2263  !
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Millions of people spend there lives pondering over the question: is     !
! there life after death? They do not even consider the simpler and more   !
! relevant problem: is there life BEFORE death? There is.     George Mikes !
============================================================================
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Digicom Scout modem
Date: 29 Dec 92 19:25:46 GMT
Organization: Netcom

Ken Butler (kenb@dadd.ti.com) wrote:
: 
: While we're on the subject, does anyone have any good or bad experiences
: to relate regarding hooking one of these up to a Macintosh?  The
: price/performance ratio looks good, but I'd like to know if there are
: any compatibility problems.
: 
: I have a relatively old Mac Plus that I'm using, so that could possibly
: compound the problem.

Yes, I have tested the Scout+ external on a Mac Plus with some different
com programs and it seem to work fine. The cable I used and which comes
with the modem allows hardware handshake. Its also the same cable which
Apple recommends for Appletalk Remote Access. One thing to remember is
that DTR needs to be forced ON with this setup. In the case of the
Scout+, you issue the command:

	AT&F&D0&W

to set the modem up with factory register defaults (enables *F3 hardware
flowcontrol) and forces DTR ON and writes this configuration to NVRAM, so
that it also resets to these parameters next time you turn it on or reset it.

For Appletalk Remote Access users there is a script available now, in
fact its two, one written recently by Jim Kateley of Apple, and the
other one a bit older and stuck together by yours truly.

The fax side works with the bundled Quicklink II. I found its important
to set the number of lines correctly (66 for the Mac Plus) so that the
faxed output appears without overwrites. 


-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data lanes not car pool lanes      wolfgang@netcom.com 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: paetau@mits.mdata.fi (Rasmus Paetau)
Subject: HOW to set up the GVC V.32/V.42bis
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 22:18:52 GMT


Hello! I need to set up a GVC V.32/V.42bis modem for a friend, and
he's lost his manual. I want to know how you have to set it up so that
it only gives one type of CONNECT response for error correcting modem,
eg. now it gives CONNECT 9600T/V42BIS for V.42bis mode, and 9600/MNP
for MNP mode, my friend wants it to say the same thing for both these
modes, like the US Robotics says CONNECT SOMETHING/ARQ. Is this
possible?

Please reply via email!

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Rasmus Paetau (paetau@mits.mdata.fi) | I still believe in Falcon030 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mckeeveb@monashee.sfu.ca (Gumby - The unknown user)
Subject: Re: HELP! problems with 2-line phones
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 07:04:49 GMT

tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook) writes:

>In article <1992Dec22.210253.15328@ksmith.uucp> keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith) writes:
>>
>>Yep.  If you DON'T get noise with the other phones disconnected I would
>>suggest that you route the modem number thru a knockout switch at your
>>modem site.  Run 2 pair from your CO to the modem site and hook up a
>>DPDT switch like this:
>>
>>
>If you want to do this automatically, rather than manually, get a
>41434 exclusion module from Proctor and Associates.  It is modular,
>and will sit ahead of everything and divide the line into two
>branches....one for the modem, and the other for the phones.  Whichever
>side is off hook first will have control of the line, and the other
>side wont even be connected.

I believe Radio Electronics published plans for an inexpensive device
of this sort.  I'd be happy to scan them and mail a TIFF image to anyone
who wants it.

-- 
    Rob McKeever  VE7ICJ  rmckeeve@sfu.ca  mckeeveb@sfu.ca  604-291-0457
"Do you know what standards are?  They're career paths for people who don't
 want to work!" - John Parkinson, Ernst & Young at the BCDMA Conference '92
       -*-          Standard Disclaimers should be adequate        -*-
From: usp@jif.berkeley.edu (USP Network)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Info on TurboModem
Date: 29 Dec 1992 01:04:51 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: jif.berkeley.edu

The subject says it all.  Has anybody tried the TurboModem V.32bis modem?
Is it good? 
Thanks
Carlos Ruggiero, usp@jif.berkeley.edu