From: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Radar Invisibility
Keywords: Snarfy's Street Sheet Tech Briefs
Date: 25 Aug 92 20:51:19 GMT
Reply-To: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us


                           STREET SHEET TECH BRIEF #3

                   " In Search of...the Lost Mach Principle "

                                   PART ONE

                              RADAR INVISIBILITY

    It has been asserted that the explosion of an atomic bomb in New  Mexico
   in  1945  was not the only result of an intensified effort on the part of
   the government to find new (and dangerous) practical applications of  the
   conceptual  works  of  Einstein,  Planck,  Bohr and others. Radar , a new
   technology of the early years of WWII , was near the top of the  list  in
   the priority of research activities . The only thing that can be said for
   certain  about  the  so-called "Philadelphia Experiment" is that the Navy
   has never accounted for the "loss" of the deck logs of the U.S.S Eldridge
   for  the  time  period  in  question (August 27,1943 through December 1st
   1943). Nor has it ever explained  the  motivation  behind  an  "Executive
   Order" to destroy the deck logs of the S.S. Andrew Furuseth , the crew of
   which are said to have witnessed rather bizarre effects of a high powered
   radar experiment performed upon the Eldridge.

    Given the silence of the official record , one is left to extrapolate on
   the basis of the conceptual works themselves.

    Erwin   Schrodinger   (1887-1961)   believed   that   the   experimental
   verification  of  the  wave  nature  of  the electron ,was in fact a more
   fundamental expression of  the  electromagnetic  variable  than  normally
   appears in Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism. These are the charge
   and  current  density  field  variables  .   Maxwell's  equations  do not
   explicitly predict the wave nature of a  "matter  field"  (postulated  by
   Descartes,  which  suggests  that  the  `things'  composing  the material
   universe  are  modes  of  a  continuous  field   ,   distinguishable   as
   people,planets ,rocks and galaxies as are vortices in a turbulent fluid).
   On  the  other hand , this wave nature of the matter field is implicit in
   the source terms that predict the electric and magnetic fields  of  force
   that  a  radiating  (emitting) mass exerts upon another (absorbing) mass.
   Planck had earlier discovered the discontinuity of the  energy  exchanged
   when   "light"  (various  incoherent  frequencies  of  EM  radiation)  is
   transferred  between  interacting   atoms   of   matter.    Schrodinger's
   contribution  to  the  overall  view  was that the energy values could be
   described as continuous , and not discrete , when a  RESONANT  (coherent,
   single frequency) condition was met. In this view then ,it is the energy
   and  frequency TRANSFER BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL "ATOMS" that is discrete, and
   not the energy values themselves.

    Schrodinger's  arguments  can  be  summed  up  as follows:

    If v(e) is the frequency component of the electronic charge distribution
   at some initial time, and if v(e)' is it's frequency component after  the
   charge  distribution  has  transferred this frequency to some other mass,
   and if the corresponding frequency components of the absorbing  mass  are
   v(a)' (after absorption) and v(a) (before absorption), then the rule that
   relates  the  frequency  transfer  between coupled emitting and absorbing
   resonating elements is:

   eq.1                 v(e) - v(e)' =  v(a)' - v(a)

    Note that the frequencies referred to are not associated with any single
    particle of a system. They are rather the normal modes of oscillation of
    a system taken as a whole.

    For  those  who  find  it  necessary  to  believe in the idea of quantum
   "jumps" between individual atoms , it is pointed out that one merely  has
   to  multiply both sides of the equation by Planck's constant, h ,then use
   the definition of the quantized energy  ,E  =  hv  ,  to  arrive  at  the
   relation having to do with `energy conservation':

   eq.2                  E(e) - E(e)' =  E(a)' - E(a)

     The point of all this is that one  need  not  postulate  a  fundamental
   atomistic  model  for  charged  matter  in  order to formulate a complete
   theory of the interaction of resonant (mutually coupled) systems.In fact,
   using Schrodinger's model , one can reduce any material element  to  it's
   predetermined  properties  of  resistance  (or 1/resistance) ,capacitance
   and inductance per unit  of  mass  to  determine  it's  normal  modes  of
   electrical  vibration  most conducive to energy transfer. In this regard,
   it is interesting to note that magnetic resonance drives the electrons in
   an iron specimen (such as a Navy destroyer) into a condition  of  uniform
   precession.  The precession of an electron describes a cone. A precession
   cone describes a vortex.

     Electrons in magnetized iron precess at the frequency:

   eq.3                           Wp = yUoH

     Where (H) is the applied magnetic field and  (y)  is  the  magnetogyric
     ratio (e/m) . Uo is the permeability constant.

   These  equations  will  be developed further in future editions of STREET
   SHEET TECH BRIEFS.

                     Transcribed from a QPKD fax from Malnex
Xref: sparky sci.physics:13972 sci.environment:10979 misc.consumers:15973