HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sinster@cse.ucsc.edu (Darren Senn)
Newsgroups: comp.robotics
Subject: Miniboard 2.0 Parts Kit: Yet Another Update
Date: 2 Sep 92 23:32:11 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz (CE/CIS Boards)
NNTP-Posting-Host: lyell.ucsc.edu

I've just sent mail to everyone who's on my list for parts kits.  If you
didn't receive mail, then your information has been lost in the shuffle.
Sorry.  Please send it to me again.

For those who missed the first messages, this parts kit is the contents
of Appendix B of the Miniboard 2.0 Reference Manual, minus the CPU and
C-cell batteries.

I'm not taking money right now, but I am taking tentative orders.  The
number of orders will allow me to determine the exact price.  So far,
78 kits have been ordered.  When we hit 100 orders, the price will drop
another notch.  Hint, hint.  :)

If you're interested in a parts kit, please send me mail.  Include your
name, email address, and the number of parts kits you'd like, assuming
a $35 price (sans shipping).  The actual price is almost certainly going
to be lower, but I won't guarantee it.  If the current ordering/pricing
trend continues, the kits will be between 20 and 30 dollars.

I can ship outside of the US.  I can't accept COD.

Thanks.
-- 
Darren Senn                                            Phone:    (408) 479-1521
sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us                       Snail: 1785 Halterman #1
Wasurenaide -- doko e itte mo soko ni anata wa iru yo.     Santa Cruz, Ca 95062
Newsgroups: comp.robotics
From: sarrica@citi.umich.edu (Steve Sarrica)
Subject: Re: Robotic Crane
Organization: Center for Information Technology Intergration, University of Michigan
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:00:07 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.232457.9619@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, souissi@ec.ecn.purdue.edu (Ridha Souissi) writes:
|> 
|> Hello there,
|>
|> Has anyone seen the brief story about a "robotic crane" that
|> was shown on CNN Headline news last night (Sept. 1)?
|> If so could you please give me the name of the company or
|> center who is doing this work (if you recall it).
|> I think it is  located in Maryland.
|> 
|> Thanks in advance.
|> 
|> Ridha.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is backing the project.
Newsgroups: comp.robotics
From: fredm@media.mit.edu (Fred Martin)
Subject: Mini Board 2.0:  new sensor documentation now on-line
Organization: MIT Media Laboratory
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 19:14:56 GMT

I have re-formatted and placed in the "pub/miniboard/docs" directory
two excerpts from the "6.270 Robot Builder's Guide" that are relevant
to Mini Board projects:

* The file "sensors.PS" illustrates how to build a variety of common
  robotics sensors which are compatible with the Mini Board.

* The file "chapter6.PS.Z" is a link to the Chapter 6 from the Builder's
  Guide, which describes the theory of operation of the sensors
  illustrated in the previous pages.  (Note that this file is stored in
  binary compressed form, using Unix compress, so it must be transferred
  using FTP binary mode.)


I hope this additional information is valuable!

	- Fred

(how-to FTP information follows.)

Full documentation for the Mini Board is available via anonymous FTP
to "cherupakha.media.mit.edu" (Internet 18.85.0.47).  Go to
"pub/miniboard" directory and begin by reading the README file located
there.  You will need a PostScript printer to print out the
documentation files.

People who don't have access to anonymous FTP can do FTP-by-mail,
provided as a public service by DEC.  Send a message containing the
single word "help" to "ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com" for instructions.  You
probably will want to start your queries by retrieving the file named
"allfiles.ftp", which is at the top-level directory of our FTP server.
This file is a recursive directory listing of all files on the server.

-- 
Fred Martin | fredm@media.mit.edu | (617) 253-7143 | 20 Ames St. Rm. E15-301
Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT Media Lab     | Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
Xref: sparky comp.robotics:1713 sci.electronics:15230
From: kilian@cray.com (Alan Kilian)
Newsgroups: comp.robotics,sci.electronics
Subject: ADXL50 Accelerometer resolution
Date: 4 Sep 92 16:17:11 GMT
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.


About the ADXL50 accelerometer's resoloution:

Full scale is -50g to 50g so that's (about) 100g Full Scale (FS)
FS output span 0.8 to 2.8 Volts
Zero-g output 1.80 Volts
Sensitivity 20 mV/g (Milivolts per g)
Voltage Noise:
  At bandwidth = 0.3 kHz  +/- 0.33 %FS  (I think this is +/- 0.33g)
  At bandwidth = 1.0kHz  +/- 0.6   %FS  (I think this is +/- 0.6g)

So I don't think the resolution is really great but I don't have a good
idea of the accelerations you might want to measure.

                           -Alan Kilian
-- 
 -Alan Kilian           kilian@cray.com 612.683.5499 (Work) 612.729.1652 (Home)
  Cray Research, Inc.   655 F Lone Oak Drive, Eagan  MN, 55121 
                        "It's based on actual math". -Dilbert
Newsgroups: comp.robotics
From: gat@forsight.jpl.nasa.gov (Erann Gat)
Subject: Re: Miniboard 2.0 & NMI F68HC11
Keywords: Miniboard
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 16:39:12 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.135419.3725@hubcap.clemson.edu> dawill@hubcap.clemson.edu (david williams) writes:

[Talking about the Maxim MAX233 RS232 level converter chip]

>   As a matter of fact, I've used this critter before, and it works
>very well.  I can't say enough about Maxim's products:  they do what 
>they're supposted to, first time.

I have an interesting testimonial to the MAX233.  I used one to connect
a New Micros 6811 board to my Macintosh.  I had been using it for several
months and it worked like a charm.  Then one day I decided to make a
second MAX233 board, so I traced out the wiring on my original (since
I had lost my schematic).  To my amazement I found that the chip's Vcc
pin was disconnected.  Not just a broken connection; there was no wire
there at all.  The thing had been working beautifully for months
WITHOUT POWER!  I doff my hat to the Maxim designers.

BTW: Re the discussion of whether there should have been a MAX233 on
the miniboard: I think it makes more sense to build a separate little
board with a MAX233 on it.  Consider: there are two ways in which the
6811 asynchronous serial port can be used, to talk to a terminal or
to talk to other 6811's.  When 6811's talk to each other they usually
don't need to level-shift, and presumably one only uses one terminal
at a time.  A Max233 chip consumes quite a bit of real estate (on the
scale of the miniboard, anyway).  I think it's a defensible design.

Erann Gat
gat@robotics.jpl.nasa.gov
From: sjsobol@tiny.com (Steven J. Sobol)
Reply-To: sjsobol@tiny.com (Steven J. Sobol)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Distribution: world
Subject: Re: UUPC with Hayes "compatibles"
Organization: The Tiny Software Company, Main Office, Cleveland, Ohio
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 01:41:08 

brown@odin.ins.cwru.edu (Dan Brown) writes:
>In an earlier posting tucker@bedford.progress.COM writes:
>>I have two users, one with a Intel 2400ex and another with a Digitan DS24
>
>I have an Intel 2400ex, and haven't had any real problems with dialing out.
>
>I use UUPC. I can send the .mdm file if you would like. I think that it is
>pretty much standard.  I have had some troubles with people dialing in to 
>my machine. For a couple people, both running ISC unix, it seems to work ok
>most of the time, for others, one with  Smailpc, one with Coherent, they
>just can't get anything to work.

I should mention, being the aforementioned person trying to dial in 
with Coherent, that I only tried a few times. Coherent may actually
work with the 2400ex. I haven't really been worried about trying it
since Dan's system is not my primary feed and I've been doing other
stuff. Coherent 3.2 is a strange bird anyhow, so who knows...

Perhaps when I finally receive 4.0 and install Taylor UUCP. Oh well.

*--TechnoGeek--*

-- 
***  **  ** | The Tiny Software Co.  23707 Glenhill  Cleveland OH 44122
 *  *   *   | Steve Sobol * President * sjsobol@tiny.com or tiny!sjsobol 
 *   *  *   | Alternate addresses: sjsobol@wariat.org or ag510@po.cwru.edu
 *    * *   | Disclaimer: I *AM* the Tiny Software Company. 
 *  **   ** | **Welcome to Ohio, the Land of the Orange Construction Barrel**
From: dawson@vdbsan (Willard Dawson)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Can't connect site with FSUUCP v1.3
Keywords: polyslo, fsuucp
Date: 27 Aug 92 19:33:32 GMT
Organization: BellSouth Information Networks, Inc.

rlv@runge.mit.edu (Ralph Vinciguerra) writes:

>In article <c1HVPB3w165w@jeslacs.wimsey.bc.ca> psmode@jeslacs.wimsey.bc.ca (Peter Smode) writes:
>>I have been trying to connect to polyslo.calpoly.edu to get pub/fsuucp13r1.zip
>>without success. I run through the ftp mailserver at decwrl, and it keeps
>>sending back session logs that show a failure to connect.
>>
>>Is FSUUCP 1.3 available yet? Is it available from polyslo? Is there another
>>site which may have it?
>>

>I was having trouble as well from direct ftp contact. It seems to be worki
>now.

I just got a response back from ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com... I was able to connect
with polyslo, but there is there is no file named "pub/fsuucp13r1.zip" ...

Where is it really?
-- 
Willard Dawson, BellSouth Advanced Networks, 1100 Johnson Ferry Road, Ste. 880
Atlanta, GA  30342, Voice: +1 404 303 2343, UUCP: gatech!vdbsan!dawson
Internet -> X.400:  /G=W/S=DAWSON/O=BSAN/ADMD=BELLSOUTH/C=US/@sprint.com
Percent hack:  dawson%vdbsan@gatech.edu   ::    Standard disclaimer applies.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: dlucy@sandr.COM (Douglas Lucy)
Subject: NEEDED: UUCP statistics utilities
Organization: S&R Software, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 15:52:21 GMT

We're expanding our internal network of Unix boxes and I need
a suite of utilities to provide some answers like the following:

	How much mail is each machine receiving daily?

	What file transfers (uucp site_a!file1 site_b!site_c!file_1)
	are going thru each machine?

	How much disk is used per day? (Is spool filling up, or
	is the current size ok for now)

I'm sure more questions will arise as we do more and more with
mail and uucp.

What utilities are available? What do YOU use?

FYI, we are mostly SCO Unix 3.2.2 but ALL of our machines will
be 386 Unix at 3.2 or later.

Thanks in advance.
-- 
[ W. Douglas Lucy, VP Technical Services, S and R Software, Inc. ]
[ dlucy@sandr.COM                                                ]
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,comp,mail.sendmail,comp.mail.misc
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: smail3 returning undeliverable email
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 01:33:40 GMT

We are running smail3 release 26 (I think) here under SVR4 4.0

I have noticed a problem with undeliverable email messages not
being forwarded correctly.

For example, mail comes in from the site bluemoon for the site
ka3ovk.  If ka3ovk doesn't pick up his email, I will get messages
for the user bluemoon on this machine (in /usr/mail/bluemoon) that
the email for ka3ovk is undeliverable - and that it will continue
to try to deliver this traffic.

The sites login to this machine using their uucp name, so bluemoon
logs in as bluemoon, and ka3ovk logs in as ka3ovk.  In /etc/passwd
uucp accounts (like bluemoon and ka3ovk) have the same user and
group assigned as uucp 

What is the problem?

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Xref: sparky comp.mail.uucp:1735 biz.comp.telebit:873 comp.dcom.modems:12891
From: craven@egr.msu.edu (Dean Craven)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,biz.comp.telebit,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: UUCP via Netblazer dial-up?
Date: 3 Sep 92 02:42:03 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University, College of Engineering
Originator: craven@eecae.ee.msu.edu

Any suggestions on how to establish a UUCP connection (using the standard
UUCP 'g' protocol) to an Internet host via a Telebit Netblazer dial-up
line?

As I understand it, the UUCP 'g' protocol needs an 8-bit binary data path.
When I login to the Netblazer, I see there is a 'binary <session> on|off'
command.  However, I don't know the 'session' number until AFTER I telnet
to the Internet host which is running 'uucpd'.  Even then, I have to 'escape'
back to the Netblazer and run a command to list current sessions.  This all
seems real interactive and beyond what a UUCP 'chat script' might be able to
do.  Is there some way to make this work?  Thanks.

Dean Craven (craven@egr.msu.edu)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: rlv@runge.mit.edu (Ralph Vinciguerra)
Subject: Re: Can't connect site with FSUUCP v1.3
Summary: It's back now, was gone for a bit
Keywords: polyslo, fsuucp
Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 92 16:27:35 GMT

In article <c1HVPB3w165w@jeslacs.wimsey.bc.ca> psmode@jeslacs.wimsey.bc.ca (Peter Smode) writes:
>I have been trying to connect to polyslo.calpoly.edu to get pub/fsuucp13r1.zip
>without success. I run through the ftp mailserver at decwrl, and it keeps
>sending back session logs that show a failure to connect.
>
>Is FSUUCP 1.3 available yet? Is it available from polyslo? Is there another
>site which may have it?
>

I was having trouble as well from direct ftp contact. It seems to be worki
now.
Xref: sparky comp.mail.uucp:1718 comp.bbs.misc:737
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,comp.bbs.misc
Subject: Re: FSUUCP 1.3 Release 1, release date 15 August
From: cambler@zeus.calpoly.edu (Christopher J. Ambler, Phish)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 19:10:48 GMT
Organization: Fantasy, Incorporated: Reality None of Our Business.

hafner@gshalle3.informatik.tu-muenchen.de recently informed us:
>Hi!
>After reading most of the documentation, all is quite clear to me
>except one point. I don't understand the batchcfg - syntax.
>
>It may be a naive or silly question, but what exactly does
>
>   site       size    queue   builder muncher     sender
>   ----       ----    -----   ------- ----------  ------
>   bridge     40000   20      batcher compcun 12  fsuucp
>
>              ^^^^^
>
>size?

Size is the maximum size per batch BEFORE COMPRESSION. So, if you have
a size of 40K, and a queue of 20, you'll batch up 800K of articles (again,
before compression) before batching stops.

-- 
If you insist upon living in a  | cambler@zeus.calpoly.edu | Fubar Systems BBS
dream, you may be taken as mad. |                          | (805) 54-FUBAR
  I like my dream.              | Because all you of       | 3/12/24, MNP5, 8N1
Then you *are* mad!             | Earth are IDIOTS!!       | FSBBS 2/FSUUCP 1.3
Xref: sparky comp.mail.uucp:1723 comp.mail.elm:2268 comp.os.linux:9429
From: vds7789@aw2.fsl.ca.boeing.com (Vincent D. Skahan)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,comp.mail.elm,comp.os.linux
Subject: domainized headers, smart-host on uucp-only elm system?
Date: 30 Aug 92 15:07:27 GMT
Organization: none

I'm running elm2.3pl11 and smail2.5 on a Linux (PD unix)
system at home and have a few questions...

	1. My system is uucp-only, but is registered in
		the .US domain, so I want my mail to go
		out with domainized (rather than bang)
		headers...how ?

		Is this a compilation option in elm ?
		In smail ? In both and they have to be
		the same ?

	2. Smail2.5 works just fine with a pathalias
		database in bang-path mode, but I don't
		need any database at all since I can kick
		my stuff to a smart-host and let them
		deal with the MX records and uucp maps.

		How can I set up smail2.5 to define a
		smart-host that all mail gets kicked to
		if there's no explicit pathalias entry
		for the remote system. Again, I need to
		have domainized headers...

Lastly, I've been unable to get smail3.1.26 to compile,
so that's not an option at this time.  However, if the
above is possible in smail3.1.26 (and not in smail2.5),
let me know and maybe I'll stomp on gcc a bit more :-)

Thanks, any help is appreciated...


		
-- 
   ---------   Vince Skahan   -----------   vince@atc.boeing.com   ---------   
   Is there a more perfect road paving material than what you get when
   you supersaturate Sweet'N'Low and CoffeeMate in a mug of coffee ?
From: bheess@mcws.fidonet.org (Brian L. Heess)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: UUCP/UUPC alternatives?
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 92 15:37:56 PDT
Reply-To: bheess@mcws.fidonet.org
Distribution: world
Organization: midnight computer wiring society - Tujunga, CA, USA

eschwart@netcom.Netcom.COM (Eric Schwartz) writes:

> Can someone give me a quick run-down on the programs that are available
> to emulate UUCP on PCs?  I'd also especially like to know where they
> are ftpeeable.

Waffle, UUPC, FSUUCP, UFGATE, Fredgate (in beta).

The first three are probably the best bet, as the last two are more
like gateway packages to/from Fidonet.

They should all be available at ftp.ieee.org and halcyon.com, since
when I or another send them out, they automatically go to the ftp
dir on ieee, and then halcyon.

Good luck!

-Brian

--
Home:  bheess@mcws.fidonet.org  Bang:  ..!{elroy,oxy}!mcws!bheess
Fido:  Brian Heess - 1:102/851 - 818-352-2993 (BBS)
PhHm:  818-353-0727  PhWk: /dev/null
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: ddunlap@boi.hp.com (Doug Dunlap (DTC))
Subject: HELP! uugetty not bringing DTR up
Summary: I cannot get uugetty to bring DTR high
Keywords: uugetty, getty, DTR
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1scd1 PL4
Distribution: usenet
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 22:18:49 GMT

I am running HP-UX and connot seem to get uugetty to bring DTR high.

My setup is:

/etc/inittab:
init:4:initdefault:
m2:4:respawn:/usr/lib/uucp/uugetty -r -t60 tty09 tb19200

/etc/gettydefs:
tb19200# B19200 OPOST ONLCR HUPCL
       # B19200 CS8 ICRNL IXON IXANY ONLCR OPOST ECHOK ECHO
         ICANON ISIG INPCK ISTRIP HUPCL
       #login:
       #tb19200

/usr/lib/Devices:
ACU tty09 - 19200 t3000 \D

/usr/lib/Dialers:
t3000  =W-,    "" ATDT\D CONNECT\s14400 \r\c


ANY help would be greatly appreciated.

Doug

============================================================      __
Doug Dunlap   (208)323-6257  ddunlap@hpbs2747.boi.hp.com         / /
Hewlett-Packard                                                 / /___  _______
Distributed Technical Computing                                / __  / / ___  /
Mail Stop 1110                                                / / / / / /__/ /
11311 Chinden Blvd                                           /_/ /_/ / _____/
Boise,  ID  83707                                                   / /
============================================================       /_/
From: ddunlap@boi.hp.com (Doug Dunlap (DTC))
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: HELP! No login prompt.
Summary: No login prompt.
Keywords: UUCP, uugetty
Date: 26 Aug 92 23:10:35 GMT
Distribution: comp.mail.uucp
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1scd1 PL4

I cannot get a login prompt from the remote machine.

I am connecting via Telebit t300 modems at 14400 on
HP-UX and am configured as such:

/etc/inittab
 m2:2:respawn:/usr/lib/uucp/uugetty -r -t60 tty03 19200

/etc/gettydefs
 19200   # B19200 HUPCL IGNPAR PARENB ICRNL IXON OPOST ONLCR CS7 CREAD
                  ISIG ICANON ECHO ECHOK PARENB ISTRIP IXANY TAB3
         # B19200 SANE CS7 PARENB ISTRIP IXANY TAB3 HUPCL
         #login: #19200

/usr/lib/uucp/Devices 
  Direct tty03 - 19200 direct

My modems will connect with "CONNECT 14400", but I never
get a login: prompt.

Many thanks in advance.

Doug Dunlap
ddunlap@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com
From: jgb@mcm.com (Jeff Bennington)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: uuxqt with bad addresses
Summary: uuxqt chokes with Decnet addresses
Keywords: uuxqt Decnet
Date: 28 Aug 92 16:52:43 GMT
Reply-To: jgb@honeydew (Jeff Bennington)
Distribution: na
Organization: Mellon Capital Management Corp., San Francisco

Recently an email item arrived via uucp which contained a translated
address from Decnet (I believe).  uuxqt didn't understand the
syntax for the return address, so it logged the event and tossed
the email item out.  Had our site not been trapping mail (for
tracking down another unrelated mail problem here) we would have
never found this:

Here's the X. file: ("user" substituted to protect the guilty!)

	U daemon netcomsv
	# return status on failure
	Z
	# use sh to execute
	e
	# return address for status or input return
	R "huge1::user"@ljohub.enet.dec.com
	# job id for status reporting
	J casabaC6616
	F D.netco74d7485
	I D.netco74d7485
	C rmail jgb@mcm.com 

Our system:
	Sun Sparcs running SunOS 4.1.2.

I spoke with our uucp neighbor, Netcom... They say this is a known problem
in uucp-land, what with the various network email translations
going on, and lack of clear-cut standards.  

My questions:

	1. Is there a simple solution for resolving this with an
	   upgraded uuxqt? 

	2. How has your site solved this, or have you just ignored
	   the problem, waiting for the other mailers to conform
	   to uuxqt-understandable addresses?

	3. Is there a simple mod to let the newsadmin know
           this happens?  (Yes, I could write a script to
           scan the logs for choke messages..)

	4. How should the site doing the translation handle
           this address? Something like user%huge1@ijohub...?
           I understand the double quotes make uuxqt choke.


	Thanks!

		jeff
		jgb@mcm.com
From: Helge.Oldach@Stollmann.DE (Helge Oldach)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Problem with apostrophe in mail address
Date: 28 Aug 92 07:11:37 GMT
Organization: Stollmann GmbH, D-2000 Hamburg 50, Germany
Originator: he@sup

makey@VisiCom.COM (Jeff Makey) writes:
| Any idea why uuxqt barfs on an address with an apostrophe in it?
| [...]
|   uuxqt cmd (rmail O'Name@valid.domain.name ) status (DENIED)

Most probably because the apostrophe is a /bin/sh metacharacter and
uuxqt forks a shell to execute the rmail command. Or, your uuxqt
examines the command string for special characters and refuses to
execute obscure commands. (This is a security feature.)
-- 
Helge.Oldach@Stollmann.DE
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: tucker@bedford.progress.COM (Kyle Tucker)
Subject: UUPC with Hayes "compatibles"
Reply-To: tucker@bedford.progress.COM
Organization: Progress Software Corp.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 17:37:16 GMT

I have two users, one with a Intel 2400ex and another with a Digitan DS24
modem. Both these guys swear they are truly Hayes compatible. I have run UUPC
on a number of compatibles with no problem. One of these users called the
manufacturer and told them the "initialization string" in the HAYES24.MDM
file and the manufacturer says "those aren't Hayes command set strings". My
question is two-fold. What are the \ escaped chars in the .MDM and are they
UUPC or uucp specific? Also, to try to get these modems to work, should I
be fiddling with the .MDM file or tweaking elsewhere. Incidentally, the
modems are never dialing so I know it's not the chat script. Also, ProComm
and other "Hayes compatible" driven software works fine. Any help once
again greatly appreciated.

Please post reponses to the newsgroup, we currently have mail bouncing
from our uucp relay site. Thanks in advance!
 
- Kyle
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kyle Tucker - Email Administrator  | 		Progress Software Corporation
tucker@bedford.progress.com 	   |		14 Oak Park
(617)280-4565			   |		Bedford, Mass. 01730
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -