HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rushers and a little more (top ten single season)
Keywords: 2000 rushing
Date: 13 Nov 92 01:35:16 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison

In article <3eAz03zsbay200@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend) writes:
>>
>
>	I believe 1963 was the first year of the 14-game season. I could be 
>wrong but I think that is the case. Besides, is there any doubt that the 
>level of competition in today's NFL is light years above what it was in 
>1963?  No disrespect intended to Big Jim but he played against lesser 
>competition than did O.J., Payton, Campbell or Dickerson. 

Sure, yeah.....
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 12 NOV 92 09:48:20    

In article <1992Nov11.172402.13884@ultb.isc.rit.edu>, txa4331@ultb.isc.rit.edu (T.X. Agrawal) writes...

>In article <1992Nov11.164053.15434@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>>Week 11: No change in top 7.  (Steeler fans are not going to be 
>>happy.)
>>                            Last
>>Rank   Team         Rating  Week
>> 1     Cowboys        90     1
>> 2     Eagles         84     2
>> 3     Saints         82     3
>> 4     Vikings        80     4
>> 5     49ers          79     5
>> 6     Redskins       72     6
>> 7     Bills          70     7
> 
>BILLS AT # 7 ????????????????? You must be a nut-case, or rather you 
>and your computer. Bills are nothing less than a number 1 team. As 
>Thurminator said, after losing 2 Super Bowls they are gonna win 2 in
>a row.

Either you forgot the smiley on this message or this is an attempt at 
a reverse-woop-jinx.  (The football gods never fall for those.)

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Best In The NFL (was: Randal benched)
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 20:31:25 GMT

paladin@leland.Stanford.EDU (Jason Gische) writes:
>NFL men agree that Marino is
>the best QB in the NFL (granted, probably since Montana retired.)  

Which NFL men?  Marino hasn't been selected as a pro-bowl starter in years.

By the way, this week's Sports Illustarted has an all-pro team for the
half-season mark.  The players were voted by 21 GM's and coaches.
Steve Young won the QB spot, and rightfully so.

While I'm at it, as a Miami fan I was dazed and confused to see that
the Fins are the teams with the most players in that list!  Even more
perplexing is that they acheive this feat *without* Marino, the Marks,
Offerdahl, Reggie Roby or Don Shula (who was listed as 2nd or 3rd in
the coach position...)  Who would have thunk.

(The all-pro Fins according to this poll are: OT Richmond Webb, TE
Keith Jackson, OLB Bryan Cox, SS Louis Oliver and PK Pete Stoyanovich).


--Gidi		(go colts)


Organization: Senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Mon,  9 Nov 1992 11:14:03 -0500 
From: Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Pitt #1 - NOT
Distribution: usa

Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 9-Nov-92 Pitt #1 - NOT
Ronald Fedkiw@crenshaw.m (1472)

> [lots of moronic Buffalo barking deleted...]

> Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@joshua.math.ucla.edu)

> A plan is made by someone who is sitting and thinking ...
> while others are doing.


all I can say is I hope the Fish beat the shit out the Chips next week....
just for you....!

--Vernon.
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Wanted - Time of Possession Stats
Date: 5 Nov 1992 19:29:04 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

Hi there
Can anybody post the time of possession stats
for each team in the NFL at the midway point
of the season.
Thanx a lot.

************************************************************
N.Ramasubramanian          	    

Dept. of Mech. Engg.	        Listach for ROY
Marquette University       
************************************************************
From: t_trunc@chips.bash.edu (Tursiops Truncatus)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphins 6-1
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:20:45 GMT
Organization: Buffalo Chips Pathology, Inc.

In article <1992Nov2.082005.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:

>In article <92306.194257JMC162@psuvm.psu.edu>, <JMC162@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>> A wake up call.  The Dolphins need a blow horn to wake them up!  I'm counting d
>> own the day to the rematch.  Prediction Buffalo: 31 Fish: 14.

>                        CHEAP TALK. See THE BET II.

>                          At 6-2, I still believe.

>                               -doug THE dolfan-

KEEP THE FAITH!!!

TT
Tursiops Truncatus 
*************************************************************************
GREAT MOMENTS IN BUFFALO HISTORY:  Thurmon Thomas loses his helmet during 
the opening series of SuperBowl XXVI
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jimarcey@eos.ncsu.edu (JOEL IAN MARCEY)
Subject: Re: THE BET II
Originator: jimarcey@c00091-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: jimarcey@eos.ncsu.edu (JOEL IAN MARCEY)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 21:15:01 GMT


  
I want to be in the BET II

BILLS FAN #1

DOLPHINS are going down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mbs@zycor.lgc.com (Matt Shostak)
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Organization: Landmark/Zycor   Austin, Texas
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:55:42 GMT

In article <1dp6lfINNhtk@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K) writes:

[Stuff about Russell Maryland deleted]

>
>I agree with you *ice*.  I thought Maryland had a very good rookie
>year in 1991 (not 1990).  He's been hampered by injuries this season,
>but is still doing a good job.  
>As most of us Cowboys fans pointed out when Maryland was selected,
>his strongest assets are that he is a very dedicated, very team-oriented
>player who makes the players around him perform better.  So far, he's 
>done everything that's been expected of him, and he's likely to do more
>when he gets completely healthy.
>It's hard to already label any player from the 1991 draft a bust
>already (O, so Huey Richardson IS a bust!).  But, below is the first
>round of that draft.  Do you see anybody there that has played significantly
>better than Maryland over the past 1 1/2 season?
>
>1991 First Round

[...]

>5, LA Rams, Todd Lyght, cb, Notre Dame,

I haven't been following too closely, but from what I've heard he's doing
really well.

>13, Dallas, Alvin Harper, wr, Tennessee.

Harper isn't doing well?

>Ray      GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


-- 
Matthew B. Shostak              Landmark/Zycor
mbs@zycor.lgc.com               (512) 292-2357
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: whitesel@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Daniel K. Whitesell)
Subject: Re: Bengals beat Bears.  was (Re: BROWNS SUCK HARD!!)
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 18:13:39 GMT

Stuff deleted.

>>The new simpler offense will alow inexperinced recivers to help.  Bengals can
>>run.  Bears D is old.  Harbaugh is eratic passer and the only way to burn
>>the Bengal D is the pass.  My pick Bengals 36-34 fair weather, or bad
>>weather Bengals 13-10 edge Breach.  Also Harbaugh will have bad day sacked
>>3 times.
>
>Let's approach this one point at a time:
>
>The simpler offense will also allow the "old" Bears D to get an upper hand.
>

The Bengals simpler offense is by no means simple, just simpler than the
old Wyche offense.

>The Bengals _must_ run to just survive since Mr. Boomer has gone boom.
>

Three TD passes last week.  BOOM!

>Harbaugh is ineffective only when a team has a decent pass rush. This rules
						^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^
>out the Bungles. My prediction : Jim will be 22-30 2TD 0INT 225 YDS.

Is a NFL leading 30 sacks good enough.  Also Fulcher is back in secondary.
Only 225 YDS? Tomzak got 252 last week, I guess Jim can't do better. :-)

>
>Final score ( mostly due to a pumped up Chi-town "old" D )
>   Bears    17
>   Bungles   3
NOT!
	Boors	10
	Bengals	13	Looks like snow.

Mindless drivel about geographic location of fans deleted.

>Laterz.

whitesel@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dan Whitesell)
        ___      ______  __      __  ________   ______   __        ________  __
GO     / _ \    / ____/ /  |    / / / ____  /  / ___  / / /       / ____  / / /
      / / \ \  / /     / | |   / / / /   /_/  / /  / / / /       / /   /_/ / / 
     / /__/ / / /___  / /| |  / / / / _____  / /__/ / / /       / /_____  / /
    / _  __/ / ____/ / / | | / / / / /_  _/ / ___  / / /       / ____  / / /
   / / \ \  / /     / /  | |/ / / /   / /  / /  / / / /   __  __    / / /_/
  / /__/ / / /___  / /   | | / / /___/ /  / /  / / / /___/ / / /___/ / __
 /______/ /_____/ /_/    |__/ /_______/  /_/  /_/ /_______/ /_______/ /_/
=========================================================================
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Why was 1984 such a good year
Date: 13 Nov 92 14:19:11 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


In regards to why so many NFL records were broken in 1984, I have two
words for you: 

			Dan Marino! 


satish nair
go giants
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Playoff Forecasts
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Date: 10 Nov 92 03:06:56 MST
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

The computer program's playoff predictions are the same as last week's.
Now we are getting to the time of year when they mean something.

AFC Championship: Pittsburgh vs. Buffalo
NFC Championship: San Francisco vs. Dallas

Super Bowl: San Francisco vs. Buffalo

Super Bowl Champion: SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mcmillen@thepond.ssd.kodak.com (Philip McMillen)
Subject: Re: Teams with anemic offence and Super Defence
Keywords: Vikings
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 15:35:01 GMT

In article <Bx7J1D.Jzs@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan ) writes:
>
>There are 5 teams that come to my mind when I think of teams
>with anemic offence and a super defence.
>
>Eagles, Vikings, Saints from the NFC and the Steelers from 
>the AFC.
>
>S.h
> 

The Vikings have scored 211 points in 8 games!!!  Only ONE team
in the entire NFL has scored more this season, the 49ers with
230 points.  This is hardly what I would call anemic!

The main problem on offense for the Vikes so far this season
is turnovers (mostly fumbles).

Once the offense can control the turnovers, they have a
passing and rushing attack that can really move the ball!
They have already scored the second most points in
the league, if they improve they will be hard to stop.

Combine this with the outstanding defense they're playing,
and the Vikes will definately be a tough team to contend
with in the playoffs.


Phil McMillen

"Does Gannon look like Tarkenton scrambling or is it
just me?"

THE PURPLE PEOPLE EATERS ARE BACK!
From: desilets@sj.ate.slb.com (Mark Desilets)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Week 9 & cumulative passer ratings
Date: 10 Nov 92 21:55:10 GMT
Reply-To: desilets@sj.ate.slb.com (Mark Desilets)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Schlumberger ATE, San Jose

In article <1992Nov6.003412.7625@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <1992Nov5.185036.29782@sj.ate.slb.com> desilets@sj.ate.slb.com (Mark Desilets) writes:
>>>Cumulative through week 9 (minimum  90 attempts):
>>>Pos Name              Atts  Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn  TDs TD %  INT  IN% RATE
>>>--- ----------------  ----  ----  -----  -----  -----  --- ----  --- ---- -----
>>> 21 Stan Humphries     227   134   59.0   1673   7.37    7  3.1   12  5.3  70.2
>>> 22 Mark Rypien        231   126   54.5   1603   6.94    6  2.6    9  3.9  68.9
>>	Ouch!
>
>Well, Mark, given the choice of getting rid of either Rypien or Humphries in
>1991, who would you trade away?
>
>I don't think Humphries is a better QB. At least Rypien got two pro-bowl 
>seasons and a Super bowl season. Humphries is still unproven.
>
>In other words, given the Hogs, the National Defense and the Posse, I don't 
>see how interception-prone Humphries could lead the team to a championship
>in 1991.
>

 Well, Ed, there is absolutely no choice over who I'd have gotten rid of.
 I was glad to see Humphries go, since I think Conklin is better.  Nonetheless,
 Rypien's performance this season, both due to himself and to his
 depleted offensive line has been lamentable.  That Humphries, a hack
 by comparison, has a better rating, shows the extent
 of the problems that Ryp is having.  Thus, I reaffirm my "Ouch!"
 and my right as a fan to utter it. 

																								Mark (Skins' Fan)
From: jdhl@troi.cc.rochester.edu (papa_sm00sh)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Status of Andre Reed?
Date: 10 Nov 92 20:03:50 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <BxHLC2.6xK@acsu.buffalo.edu> carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carrato) writes:

>Andre was apparently "kicked in the groin". So bad that he couldn't 
>return the second half.

no... that was a pitt player who got kicked, i believe it was eoither
a db or lb ...

jason
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: meskes@ulysses.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Michael Meskes)
Subject: Top 12 in total yards from scrimmage
Organization: Rechnerbetrieb Informatik  /  RWTH Aachen
Date: 12 Nov 92 14:01:01 GMT

As mentioned earlier here are the top 12 players in total yards from
scrimmage:

Player                          Yards   TD
-------------------------------------------
Thurman Thomas			1151	9
Emmitt Smith                    1107    12
Barry Foster                    1100    5
Ricky Watters                   1055    9
Lorenzo White                    943    4
Terry Allen                      927    8
Cleveland Gary                   904	8
Sterling Sharpe                  900    6
Rodney Hampton                   881    9
Michael Irvin                    862    5
Vince Workman                    853    1
Earnest Byner                    831    4

Only two teams have two players on this list:
1) As nearly everyone expected: Cowboys
2) Who thought of this: Packers

Any comments?

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes, Lehrstuhl fuer angewandte Mathematik insb. Informatik,
RWTH-Aachen, Ahornstr. 55, D-W-5100 Aachen
Email: meskes@ulysses.informatik.rwth-aachen.de
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jayant@eng.umd.edu (Ramakrishnan Jayant)
Subject: Re: Cowboy Bandwagon
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 14:58:05 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity von Uniland, College Park
Distribution: usa
Originator: jayant@coke.eng.umd.edu


In article <1992Nov10.145932.57431@watson.ibm.com>, rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers) writes:
>In <1992Nov4.155402.39@kirk.msoe.edu> wesloskij@kirk.msoe.edu writes:
>>       Is it just me or is everyone else sick of all these "fair-
>>weather" fans jumping on the Cowboy bandwagon.  Dallas has not dominated
>>the NFC east by any means and they still have a long way to go.  The way
>>I see it, is that this trend is pretty much like our most current
>>presidential election, everybody likes the favorite, but nobody really
>>knows why.  "It's time for a change" in the NFL and it's not simply to
>>become a Cowboy fan for no reason other than they're finally out of the
>>basement.  Let's face reality, they are very overrated and will choke
>>come playoff time!!
>>
>>               Go Jim McMahon and the Eagles!!!
>>
>>--John--
>>
>
>   This is my first post to this group (I'm a fairly new reader, so
> bear with me).
>
>   I've been a Cowboy fan for 12+ years, however; even I don't want
> to get too over-confident with their performance this season.  Sure,
> I'm happy as hell to see their improvements over the past couple
> seasons, however;  I think they need to lose at least a game or two
> more before playoffs.  There's nothing worse than over-confidence.
>
>   I don't see them getting stomped by anyone, however; a loss or
> two will do them a world of good.
>

A loss in the playoffs will do the world a favour. Heh! Heh! Heh!


>Sincerely,
>Ryan Rogers

GO SKINS!!!!
From: kennedy@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Ralph Kennedy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: A Question
Date: 9 Nov 92 16:51:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: asuvax.1992Nov9.165110.22238
Organization: Arizona State Univ, Tempe


     I have a question.  Do the other teams in the
NFC West have any respect for the Los Angels Rams?

--Ralph Kennedy      {ames,gatech,husc6,rutgers}!ncar!noao!asuvax!kennedy
                        {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,oddjob}--^
                                          ^---------------The Wrong Choice
                             internet: kennedy@asuvax.asu.edu
From: seale@bcserv.wustl.edu (Seale (Jeff))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Seahawk fan
Date: 11 Nov 92 18:19:03 GMT
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcserv.wustl.edu

jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund) writes:

>In article <BxJ1vD.B4n@acsu.buffalo.edu> v050j5h4@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Steven H Todman) writes:
>>
>>     Since a poll has been taken of Seahawk Fans, I wanted to be counted.
>>
>>                                  -Steve (a frustrated fan)

>Add one more to the list.

All this Seahawks bonding is giving me a queasy feeling in my stomach!
So, add another to the list of poor schmucks who like the 'hawks.
-Jeff Seale (Seahawks fan stuck in St. Louis)
  jeff@grserv.wustl.edu






>-Eric Jaderlund
> jade@triton.unm.edu
From: nlatif@stipple.seas.upenn.edu (Nor Azlisya Abdul Latif)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles #1 Quarterback
Keywords: Jimmy Mac or Randall?
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:45:43 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <Nov.9.15.29.45.1992.13475@gandalf.rutgers.edu> bstuart@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Ben Stuart) writes:
>I was just curious.  For the rest of you Eagle fans out there, who
>would you rather have starting?  I know next week is only Green Bay,
>but their defense could give Randall the confidence he needs.  On the
>other hand, Jimmy Mac earned a starting job through his leadership
>against the Raiders and a decent showing coming off the bench cold in
>the Dallas game (allbeit with modest numbers).
>
>And for the non-Eagle fans, who deserves the job?
>
>Ben


I dont really mind that Randall is playing next week.  Jimmy Mac did a great 
job last SUnday and he should earn the job. Anyways, Randall did say that he 
wouldnt mind Jimmy Mac playing next week as the starting QB but since Kotite
had promised, he said that he's ready to go. I just hope that he can bring back
the "glorious" first quater of the season. And I also hope that Kotite will 
let Jimmy Mac play in other remaining games.

GO EAGLES!!!

Azli.
 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gilford@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Gilford T. Hapanyengwi)
Subject: Leading Rushers (was 2,000 yard rusher)
Organization: Vanderbilt University CS Dept.
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 01:36:08 GMT

Can someone post or email me stats for the leading rushers in the NFL
for this year.

Cheers,
--
<><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><>
Gilford T. Hapanyengwi       |
(615) 322-3552               |
gilford@vuse.vanderbilt.edu  |
hapanyg@vuctrvax.bitnet      |

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Subject: Cowboys Meal Menu
Organization: Abode Computer Systems
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 04:32:21 GMT

The following is the lunch menu for the Cowboys leading up this Sundays
Cowboys/Rams game at Texas Stadium:

Thursday  : Ram Chops
Friday    : Chicken Fried Ram
Saturday  : Roast Leg of Ram
Sunday    : Battered and Deep Fried Ram

The Rams haven't got a prayer on Sunday against the Cowboys. I can pick on the
Rams, they are my local team!

Cheers,

Eric

GO COWBOYS!!

-- 

		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Eric Green Suspended
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 00:08:11 GMT

FYI:  Pittsburg Steelers announced that E. Green has
been suspended for testing positive for drugs. 
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Comments on Packer loss to Giants (was NFC Central Week 10)
Date: 9 Nov 1992 18:51:04 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Nov9.153339.22580@cis.ohio-state.edu> martens@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens) writes:
>McJulien had another punt blocked.  What happened?
   
   Another fuckup by the blockers. This time it was George Koonce who let
   a guy came straight up the middle untouched. Wasn't McJulien's fault
   although he didn't play well either.

>Sharpe was the only WR with a catch, though Brooks had a 6 yard
>run.
   
   GB's wideouts other than Sharpe SUCK!! They are by far the worst in all
   of the NFL.

>Now the good news:
>
>The Bears lost.
   
   Amen!

>The Giants didn't put up big numbers either running or passing.
>It looks like the Packer defense had a pretty good game.  All but
>3 of the Giants' points came on turnovers or the blocked punt.
   
   The GB D was very good. The Giants couldn't move the ball as their
   #1 rushing attack was shut down. 

   GB won the time of possession battle quite easily. Now if the Pack
   can just cut down on turnovers, they'll be a decent team. Holmgren
   has done a good job with this team. With a good draft or two, they
   could be in the playoffs within a couple years. Except for the Tampa
   Bay game, this team has not played all that terrible. Silly mistakes
   just kill them.

   --salty


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Subject: Dear TT
Reply-To: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 22:33:05 GMT


      GREAT MOMENTS IN MIAMI HISTORY: Dan Marino and rest of
      Dolphins sip beers in their Isotoners as Thurmon can't find
      his helmet on the opening drive of SB XXVI.

      Thurmon may not be a rocket scientist but he's enjoyed
four straight seasons the length of which have been longer than
the length of the four corresponding Dolph seasons ;)- That's my
Micheal Jordan- like toungue hanging out at you. Please feel free
to harass me as I mention MJ and TT in the same sentence. My ego,
not unlike Thurmon's needs an occasional whuppin'.

      On to business: How come there is a Seattle fan on the net?
Congadulations... I've been there not a few years ago with the
Bills. Take consolation in the fact that it'll get worse before
it gets better.

      Could someone send me the Seattle Top Ten? Thanks.

      Is there any talk of Barry Sanders being dissatisfied in
Detroit? When's his contract up and will they ever get an
offensive line to block for this guy-- he's definitely the best
RB in the league. The only problem is that everyone knows it and
he's got no line. Tough luck.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro