From: New Liberation News Service <nlns@igc.apc.org>
Subject: NLNS: California Students Fight Back
Followup-To: alt.activism.d
Originator: daemon@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
Organization: ?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:32:40 GMT

California Students Go After Systemwide Reforms
Jason Kirkpatrick, NLNS

(NLNS)--Donated $35,000 to current California Republican Governor Pete 
Wilson's campaign. Co-manager of Republican Governor Deukmejian's 
1982 campaign. Chairman of state GOP in 1986. Ex-director of the Hoover 
Institute, the Stanford based conservative think-tank. Current overseer of 
Governor Wilson's personal blind trust. Former aide to Presidents Nixon 
and Reagan.
	These are just a few details about the personal backgrounds of
the 18 regents that run the prestigious seven campus University of
California system. Very rarely are any backgrounds in higher education
listed on their resumes. They receive their posts through appoinments by
the Governor of the State of California. These appointments last 12 years.
	High School dropout. Multi-millionaire with $23.3 million due to 
the IRS in back taxes. Member California Republican State Central 
Committee. Appointments secretary to Governor Pete Wilson. Member 
Board of Directors of the American Bankers Association. Former CEO of a 
Fortune 500 multi-national corporation. . .
	The above is some of the available background information on the 
18 trustees that govern the 20 campus California State University system. 
15 of the 18 are male, and all but a few are white. While many of these 
people may have backgrounds in large corporations, again, rarely do they 
have any higher education experience. They receive their positions through 
the Governor of California, and are appointed to eight year terms.
	These are also the trustees responsible for selecting Barry Munitz as 
chancellor of the CSU system. Munitz, according to the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), was substantially responsible for the failure 
of United Savings and Loan of Texas, which invested heavily in Michael 
Milken's junk bonds. Munitz is also named in lawsuits for his role in unfair 
business practices related to the hostile takeover of California's Pacific 
Lumber Company by Maxaam Corporation, of which he was Vice-Chair.
	With all of the political favoritism and corruption governing 
California's two univerisity systems, it is not hard to see why students are 
outraged about recent crises in higher education in the state. The University 
of California Student Association (UCSA), has set Regent Reform as their 
number one prioity for the 92-93 school year. Their plans include gaining 
equal representation of students, faculty, and staff on the UC Board of 
Regents. As of now these three sections of the univeristy community have 
either one seat on the board of regents, or none at all, as is the case for 
campus staff personnel. Instead of having the governor appoint all Regents, 
the UCSA is looking at proposals such as the following: 3 Regents 
appointed by the Governor, 3 by the state Senate, 3 by the state Assembly, 
3 by the Students, 3 by the Faculty, 3 by the Alumni, and 4 voting ex-
officios (those being the Governor, Lt. Governor, Speaker and 
Superintendant of Public Instruction). UCSA would also like to see the 
current 12 year term shortened.
	While the CSU Trustees have not been appointed as political favors 
as obviously as the UC Regents have, CSU students began to take notice of 
their trustees' questionable activities when CSU Chancellor Ann Reynolds 
resigned over a scandal of misuse of public funds in 1991, only to be 
replaced by Barry Munitz. The appointment of Munitz was a controversy in 
itself, sparking widespread student protests, and resulting in the passing of 
"No Confidence in Barry Munitz" resolutions on three CSU campuses.
	On the weekend of October 10-11 at UC-Irvine, the Cal State 
Student Association (CSSA) and the UCSA had their first ever joint 
conference. The two groups met to discuss issues of mutual concern and to 
see where they could provide mutual aid and support to each other. One 
such area was to make the state legislature stick to the state constitution 
which supposedly guarantees all students in the state the right to an 
"affordable accessible education." The Cal State University System has 
always accepted students who met its basic entrance requirements; that is 
until a couple of years ago. Projections now show that 70,000 eligible 
students will be turned away from the CSU system alone in the 93-94 
school year, due to the fact that higher education received the highest 
percentage of cuts of any state funded program for 92-93. This decrease of 
8.9% came at the same time as prisons received a $4 million increase, the 
only state program in California to receive an increase at all in 92-93.
	Many California students feel that one of the largest problems in 
higher education is the lack of accountability of these two governing bodies 
of the CSU and the UC systems. This is especially apparent when the 
Trustees and Regents actively raise CSU and UC student tuition by over 
60% in a two year period, in a time when as many of 33% of all classes are 
cut.
	Why should the Regents and Trustees work on behalf of the 
students when they are only accountable to the Governor?
	While the task of democratizing these bureacracies that run 
California's Higher Education may sound difficult, definite progress is 
already being made. State Senate Speaker David Roberti has already 
expressed interest in sponsoring legislation to reform the CSU Trustees. 
CSSA is working to author legislation by the time the state legislature 
convenes in January. Cal State University at Northridge and Humboldt 
State University have taken on the responsibility of being coordinators on 
this issue, with Legislative Analyst Anne Blackshaw working from CSSA's 
lobby office in Sacramento. The current background check of the Board of 
Trustees has already revealed some damning information, with more being 
checked regularly by students.
	With more time, it is hoped that coalitions will be built with the 
California Faculty Association, the Cal State Employees Association (the 
state's union for staff), and students of California's 108 campus 
Community College system, who are also governed by boards with 
inadequate student representation.
	The campaign for reform is seen as a real winning issue. As Anne 
Blackshaw states, "Trustee reform is a starting point for reformulating the 
state's priority on higher education."
	Also, when students realize that they can have more control over 
their own education, they will be more vocal about the funding they receive 
from the state. With reformation of the CSU Board of Trustees, and the UC 
Board of Regents, not only will students have direct control over where 
higher education funding goes, but they will be able to have direct control 
over issues such as affirmative action, curriculum control, selection of 
campus administrators, and dealing with priorities of what truly need to be 
researched on our campuses. Should research be prioritised the way it has 
been in the past, with priorities placed in areas such as nuclear weapons 
research? Or instead, should we be looking to the future, and placing 
priority on finding ways to maintain a healthy environment or how to create 
a strong sustainable economy for the future of the State of California?

For more information, or networking, contact: Anne Blackshaw, CSSA 
Legislative Analyst, 916-441-4514, or Tobin L. Freid, President University 
of California Student Association, 408-459-2189.

--- 30 ---

Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive