HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nittab@aix.rpi.edu (Bhimashankar Venkata Nitta)
Subject: Re: Making a wicket....
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 18:34:57 GMT

I thank all of you folks who took the trouble to write to me about making a
matting wicket. Your suggestions are greatly appreciated. I shall keep you
informed about our progress in the formation of the Rensselaer Cricket Club.

Bhima
From: haider@pi.rice.edu (Haider Abbas Rizvi)
Subject: Re: Popularity of Cricket
Reply-To: haider@rice.edu
Organization: Rice Universiy, Houston, Texas
	<1992Apr7.212818.6642@julian.uwo.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 02:37:27 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.212818.6642@julian.uwo.ca> raza@surya.ccs.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed) writes:

> I think according to recent survey by CNN cricket is among top five sports,
> but i dont know about its exact standing.  Much Music(this may or may
> not be a good reference) of Canada also mention this thing on the eve
> after final, when they give special song (We are the Champs by ??) on
> Pakistan's victory.
>
> From viewer ship point of view WC final was watched by 1500 million
  							 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
> people all over the world.

Boy, that is a big number. Where did you get this number from. I think
whoever first made/gave this number must have been considering the total
population of all the countries the match was being transmitted to, since
this is about 30% of the world's population, from the no I remember.

>
> S.R.Raza.
>

--

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Haider Abbas Rizvi                   | Deptt of Elect and Computer Engg,  |
| haider@rice.edu     		       | Abercrombie A147, Rice University, |
| (713)-527-8750-3629    	       |      Houston, TX 77251-1892.       |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: raza@hobbes.ccs.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Imran not to tour England
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:10:27 GMT
Organization: University of Western Ontario, London

In article <1992Apr15.213511.21605@leland.Stanford.EDU> arkay@leland.Stanford.EDU (Abdur Khan) writes:
>I just got back from pakistan and everyone is talking about imrans speech 
>... all he did was talk about himself " i have finally won the world cup
>in the twilight of my career".

Imran's arrogance is not new,  and people and press has only supplemented
it over the years.....by glamourizing (sp?) him too much for reasons which
are not cricket(most of the times).

Imran is a dictator by nature, and for those of you who know little bit
about state of affairs in Pakistan Hockey, Pakistan has now got a Brig Atif
in cricket also. 
>
>I read an article of miandad in dawn and there is trouble . 
>sahibzada rafay khan[ went to london and announced that we won the world cup]
>
>
S.R.Raza.
From: fdm0886@zeus.tamu.edu (Faraaz)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Who is Sachin Tendulkar (The Rising Star)!
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:53:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr14.164638.1408@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, mhusain@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Muqtada Husain) writes...

.stuff deleted

The article concerned Sachin Tendulkar!

>   His mentality for the game is most evident when he played in Pakistan, 
>undoubtedly the most difficult and hostile playing grounds in the world. At a 
>time when Imran Khan Waqar Younis and Wasim Akram (Probably the best trio of 
>pace attack in the world) are at their hostile best, and where Imran is 
>reported to have said '" ... abe hindustani pehle cricket khelna seekh...", 
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
please cite your source...... If it is an untruth, do not spread rumours.

>where all the indian batsmen had failed, Sachin was a headache to all the 
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
granted...

>Pakistani bowlers. So much so that
>Waqar Younis even tried to get him injured by bowling a barrage of bouncers, 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Intimidatory bowling is the law of the land on all home grounds. Waqar was in
all likelyhood not raging a personal vendetta on Tendulkar, nor was the team.
I am sure if India had the bowlers of the calibre of Pakistan they would not
complain of intimidatory bowling............

>Imran was totally useless,even with his 
>bouncers! Sachin played on even with blood on his face, he couldn't care less. 
>I think he scored 67.
		   ^^
admirably....

>   I have always felt that Pakistan plays dirty cricket in Pakistan,but not for
 					   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm sure you mean "intimidatory", but we've already mentioned that havn't we....

>Sachin after the test series he considered the Pakistani bowlers to be,lets say
>very good and very difficult, nothing else.
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Friday, 10 Apr 1992 22:54:16 CDT
From: <U17868@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: rec.sport.cricket
Distribution: rec.sport.cricket
 <1992Apr10.200654.11716@Princeton.EDU> <485t==m@rpi.edu>

In article <485t==m@rpi.edu>, raghavav@cs.rpi.edu (Vijay Raghavan) says:
>
d@Princeton.EDU> sguha@phoenix.Princeton.EDU
>(Saumyen Guha) writes:
>
>>>(3) Has Gavasker taken any test wickets? If so, how many? Details.
>>>
>>Two. Denis Amiss(1974-75) and Zahir Abbas(1978 or 79, Kapil's debu.
>>series).
>>-Saumyen
>
>I think Zahir Abbas was very close to a century when Gavasker got him. Am I
>right?
>vijay
>
 Yes, you are right . Zaheer was out at 96 caught Chuhan bowled Gavaskar. He ma
de 176 in the first innings. I still remember that ball.
Sikander.
From: 10703950@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au (BENJAMIN CUTLER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Popularity of Cricket
Date: 13 Apr 92 01:38:53 GMT
Organization: Faculty of Engineering, Monash University

In article <4640@cluster.cs.su.oz.au> tom@minnie.cs.su.OZ.AU (Thomas James Jones) writes:

>In article <1992Apr7.170905.31715@m.cs.uiuc.edu>, bharat@cs.uiuc.edu (R. Bharat Rao) writes:
>|> cheriv@nason110.its.rpi.edu (Vinay M. Cherian) writes:
>|> >Where would cricket be ranked in terms of popularity?
>|> 
>|> >Would it come second, after Soccer??
>|> 
>|> I don't know about cricket, but basketball is number 2.  I would guess
>|> cricket to be very far down the list because of the amount of
>|> equipment needed to play the game.  At a rough guess soccer,
>|> basketball, tennis, volleyball, table tennis, badminton, and hockey
>|> would be more popular than cricket (if popular = number of people that
>|> play the sport).
>|> 
>|> >Just curious,
>|> 
>|> >Vinay
>|> 
>|> bharat
>|> --
>|> R. Bharat Rao, E-mail: bharat@cs.uiuc.edu (bharat@kbesrl.me.uiuc.edu)
>|> AI Group, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
>|> 405 N. Matthews, Urbana, IL 61801  (217)-244-1263 (O) 244-8371(F)
>|> Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana

>        Careful with these sort of estimations.
>        There are 250 million people in USA, and a lot
>        of them may indeed play basketball.
>        There are 1 BILLION people in India/Pakistan.
>        Unless there is an huge underground basketball following
>        in the subcontinent...
>	
>        Also, there are another 1.2 Billion or so people in
>        China, possibly spending their leisure time playing
>        Pengong. 

>        I would agree, though, that soccer probably would
>        win internationally.

>        tom j. jones

Soccer is probably the most popular in number of countries in which it is 
played. But it is also the most BORING of sports - no one scores !!
The ball just goes from one end of the ground to the other and back again.
From: KSRAO@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: WI/SA ODI 2 SA after 6 overs
Date: 11 Apr 1992 09:08:55 -0500
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

     WI won the toss and sent SA to bat. Ambrose bowled 4 wides in the first
over and rwo in the second. He got Wessels caught by Williams off a ball which
would have been a wide had Wessels left it alone.



Hudson 6  not out
Wessels c William b Ambrose 1
Kirsten not out  9


28 for 1

Rao


From: shankar@aspen.IAG.HP.COM (Shankar Unni)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 19:28:53 GMT
Subject: Re: Tendulkar for Yorkshire
Organization: HP International Contract Programming
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket

In rec.sport.cricket, az1@ukc.ac.uk (A.Zafar) writes:

> 	I guess he is in. Yorshire are going to sign him up within the next 48
> hours. The contract is to be for a duration of one year. Yorkshire TV, who
> have given 100,000 pounds in sponsorship money have insisted that a top class
> replacement be made for Craig McDemmort. (ITV report).

Oh, and what happened to ol' Craig?  Hadn't he just been signed just at
the end of last season?  Is he injured or something?

Well, anyway, YTV should have no qualms in this regard. Tendulkar's
generally quite comfortable in England..
-----
Shankar Unni                                 Internet: shankar@iag.hp.com
HP International Contract Programming          HPDESK: Shankar UNNI / HP4700
Phone : +1-408-447-4007                          UUCP: ...!hplabs!hpda!shankar
From: KSRAO@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: WI/SA OD2 SA after 10 overs
Date: 11 Apr 1992 09:26:47 -0500
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

From:	IN%"KSRAO@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu" 11-APR-1992 09:07:29.68
To:	aus@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu
CC:	
Subj:	WI/SA ODI 2 SA after 6 overs

     WI won the toss and sent SA to bat. Ambrose bowled 4 wides in the first
over and rwo in the second. He got Wessels caught by Williams off a ball which
would have been a wide had Wessels left it alone.

     Hudson was out off a brilliant throw from Simmons which hit the stupms.
Hudson hit the ball to Simmons and he fielded and threw it to hit the stupms.


Hudson 6  run out  (25)
Wessels c William b Ambrose 1
Kirsten not out  
Kuiper  not out                

33 for 1

     SA team is: Wessels, Hudson, Kirsten, Kuiper, Richardson, Henry, Snell,
Pringle, Donald and ...

      WI team has Patterson and Harper in place of Hooper and Logie


Rao
From: ckhan@bbn.com (Chico Kahn (Room # 20/317 B))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: The booing of Richie Richardson of the West Indies cricket team
Keywords: importance
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:31:44 GMT
Reply-To: ckhan@BBN.COM (Chico Kahn (Room # 20/317 B))
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

In article <1992Apr10.142833.29864@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> leland@donner.uucp (25844-joseph) writes:

[good stuff deleted]

>Bring back Lloyd as manager!

As a lifelong fan of Deryck Murray, because of whom I became a wicket-keeper
actually, and someone who was quite happy to learn that he was to be made the
manager, it saddens me to say that you are probably correct.  The Murray/
Richardson combination has not been able to get the job done.

Chico.
 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ken@castle.ed.ac.uk (Ken Nisbet)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Don't need this
Date: 6 Apr 92 10:46:17 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

In article <1992Apr3.152308.1@vaxa.strath.ac.uk>, clg265@vaxa.strath.ac.uk writes:
> CRICKET IS THE MOST BORING GAME IN THE WORLD,I WOULD RATHER STAY AT HOME AND
> HAVE A SHITE.IT'S THE GAME WHERE THE TEAMS PLAY FOR A WEEK WITH THE OUTCOME A
> DRAW OR THE MATCH NOT BEING FINISHED.
> WELL SEEN IT'S ONLY THE ENGLISH POOFS THAT WATCH AND PLAY THE GAME.

We don't need this sort of stuff on the net. I respectfully suggest to this
subscriber - O.K., he doesn't like the game. Those of us who write to the net
do, so there is no necessity for us to have to exert effort pressing "n".
I suggest that the subscriber should go and write to a newsgroup on a subject 
in which he has an interest and stop wasting money and our time.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: pad@sdd.hp.com (Ramchandran Padmanabhan (Temp))
Subject: Re: World Cup 1992 Batting Averages
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, San Diego Division
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 23:05:33 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.222239.17693@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU> kumar@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU (V.R.Kumar) writes:

>
>Bowler       Cntry  M  Overs  Mdn   Runs   Wkts  Avge  Best   Ec-Rt
>------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>Wasim Akram   Pak  10   79.4   2    338     18   18.78 4-32   70.71
>

                MOST NO BALLS
                -------------

>No. of No Balls     Bowler                 Country
>-------------------------------------------------------
>     18           Wasim Akram              Pakistan
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>		MOST WIDES 
>		----------
>
>No. of Wides        Bowler                 Country
>--------------------------------------------------------
>    42            Wasim Akram              Pakistan
>-------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ramkumar
>   


   Well !  Wasim Akram bowled TEN EXTRA overs and had the last laugh.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: amanning@acd.acd.ucar.edu (Andrew Manning)
Subject: Re: Popularity of Cricket
Organization: Ntl Center for Atmospheric Research, Atmospheric Chemistry
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 21:19:08 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.170905.31715@m.cs.uiuc.edu> bharat@cs.uiuc.edu writes:
>cheriv@nason110.its.rpi.edu (Vinay M. Cherian) writes:
>>Where would cricket be ranked in terms of popularity?
>
>>Would it come second, after Soccer??
>
>I don't know about cricket, but basketball is number 2.  I would guess
>cricket to be very far down the list because of the amount of
>equipment needed to play the game.  At a rough guess soccer,
>basketball, tennis, volleyball, table tennis, badminton, and hockey
>would be more popular than cricket (if popular = number of people that
>play the sport).


No way! Popularity should be based on the number of spectators, fans, etc.
I have never played cricket in my life (competitively), but I am an avid
fan. On this basis, cricket would have to rank fairly highly, just given
the size of the Indian population, and how popular it is over there.

Andrew M.





 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: praskulk@caen.engin.umich.edu (Prashant Kulkarni)
Subject: Re: couple of questions
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 92 11:02:20 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor

    Regarding your first question, Kerry Packer 'bought' nearly
all the top players of the time and paid them money to play cricket
for him. He introduced the day-night game, 'pyjama cricket' and
excellent TV coverage to the game. Other Aussie netters would
know more..

   Regarding the second question, two examples spring to mind, both
from England. The first is Ian Botham, who was(is?) a great cricketer
but failed dismally as  a captain and the other example is of Mike
Brearley, who was a very average cricketer, but excelled in the 
captaincy department (some credit should go to Kerry Packer for that!)

prashant
From: imran@cs.mcgill.ca
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Cricket in Ottawa over the summer
Date: 5 Apr 92 18:27:58 GMT
Distribution: can
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Originator: imran@binkley.cs.mcgill.ca

Does anyone play cricket in ottawa over the summer. In Carlton or Univ. of 

Ottawa. If anyone does or anyone is interested i would be

 interested in knowing . Maybe we can organize something. Please send 

e-mail to    imran@binkley.cs.mcgill.ca             

                                              thanx
From: narasi@cs.tamu.edu (Narasi$$$$)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: WORLD XI vs Pak. XI
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:13:58 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University

Hi 

My World XI team to play against Pakistan is
1. D.Boon
2. B.Lara
3. M.Crowe
4. R.Richardson
5. S.Tendulkar
6. A.Border (C)
7. I.Healy (WK)
8. M.Pringle
9. K.Dev
10. C.McDermott
11. C.Ambrose
12th man: A.Logie

Border and Tendulkar can fill in for the 5th bowler. 

Thanks

--
Narasimhan
e-mail: sln1887@venus.tamu.edu
		or
        narasi@neuron.cs.tamu.edu
From: sridhara@plains.NoDak.edu (Venkatesh Sridharan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SIMMONS
Summary: None.
Keywords: West Indian revival ??
Date: 15 Apr 92 16:04:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.16830
Followup-To: None.
Organization: North Dakota State University, Fargo

Phil Simmons has always been an enigma, this time, however, it is his success
that is astounding. He has scored 3 centuries in the last 4 one dayers that
he has played. The details are as follows:
116 against Sri Lanka  
110 against South Africa
104 against South Africa.

This is an extremely good run of scores and it should have resulted in the
generation of a great deal of confidence in the 28 year old Trinidadian.
Before jumping to conclusions, the following points must be remembered:
1. One of the centuries was against Sri Lanka, which does not have too good
   a bowlng attack.
2. The other two were against SA and both were on his home ground.

Nevertheless, the fact that a West Indian batsman is showing such consistency
should be heartening for WI fans, who have seen their team collapse time after
time to less than spectacular bowling. Brian Lara, too is showing splendid
form, the only difference being, in his case the success is far more expected.
Having seen Lara bat for most of the World Cup and in the first two one dayers
against SA, I am convinced that he is a great player in the making ( not that
I am the first one to reach such a conclusion!).

If these two batsmen maintain their form and if Ian Bishop makes a comeback,
we should be seeing the sort of cricket we expect from the West Indies,in the
near future too.




VENKY ( Venkatesh Sridharan).
email: sridhara@plains.Nodak.edu
Win or Lose, forever Windies.
From: venky@hpcupt3.cup.hp.com (Venkataramann R)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 22:23:23 GMT
Subject: Re: RETIRES....... D. VENGSARKAR
Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket


Vengsarkar's retirement has generally gone unnoticed, I guess. What
is appreciable is the timing. He was on a downswing and would easily
have damaged his reputation. Good Move Veng !! You just saved your
butt.
 
We'll remember him for grace, style ,the enormous runs scored and his 
exploits at Lords'. We will also remember him for not being a team-man,
for lack of leadership abilities, for having been a sloppy fielder.


Venky "KapilIsTheNextCaptain"
From: karnik@atto.cs.umn.edu (Neeran Mohan Karnik)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Miandad v/s Imran!
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:39:14 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.

Here's an extract from misc.news.southasia..... the source quoted is, The Deccan
Herald, April 11.

** MIANDAD AT LOGGERHEADS WITH IMRAN
** KARACHI - Pakistan's prolific run getter and vice-captain Javed Miandad
** attacked skipper Imran Khan's call for changing the domestic cricket
** structure here on Thursday.

	No more details available. We did hear something of the sort a few days
back, didn't we ? If anyone has the details (sordid ? ;-) please post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: evan@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Evan Harris)
Subject: Re: Aussie Team (Was: Imran not to tour England)
Reply-To: evan@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Evan Harris)
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
	<74122@netnews.upenn.edu> <7571@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 05:00:28 GMT

On 16 Apr 92 03:38:11 GMT, sarge@cs.uq.oz.au (The Lemming) said:

Lemming> He is a young (19?) batsman. He was in the Under 21 squad
Lemming> that went to ZImbabwe last year, and had a reasonable shield
Lemming> season. I dont have exact figures but he seemed to score 40
Lemming> most innings, with occasional 80's or 90's.

I think he's 20 and had an average in the low 50's (51.xx rings a
bell).

Lemming> Of course, seeing he is not a Queenslander, he can't be any
Lemming> good (unless of course he moves to Qld, and then he becomes
Lemming> great)

... but it does mean he can be in a team which wins the Shield.  8-)

--
Evan Harris                                     evan@cs.mu.OZ.AU
Dept of Computer Science, The University of Melbourne, Australia
From: rammohan@usc.edu (Karthikeyan Rammohan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Miandad blasts Imran khan
Date: 10 Apr 1992 09:34:54 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sal-sun102.usc.edu

In the Indian Express and the Hindu dated 10th april, there has been a
big article in which miandad blasts imran khan for taking credit for
winning the world cup.He is stated to have said that, "there was no way
in which Imran contributed to Pakistan winning the World cup.He did
not play any cricket for the past 1 year, either test or local
cricket.He is more a liability to Pakistan than an asset".It was a big
article and i dont remember all his comments.

I don't think this is surprising as it was a weel know fact that Imran
and Javed don't get along well at all.

could anyone provide more details on this juicy matter?

source:Call from India
From: aspi@isoa3.ba.ttu.edu (Aspi Havewala)
Subject: Pix of WC teams
Organization: ISOA, Texas Tech
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:22:27 GMT

Hi,
	Since a bunch of you seem to be interested in pix etc. I have one of 
all the teams in the WC looking very "poseiur" on top of a boat with the 
Sydney Harbor in the backdrop. Here's the catch: I don't have any scanning
facilities (except in B&W). If anyone wants to make a gif image out of this,
I can mail you the pix. 

Cheers,
_Aspi_
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket



WI in SA - Whatever Happen'd to Viv,Greenidge,Dujon,Walsh


Though the booing of Richardson seems misplaced, the axing of
Richards,Greenidge,Dujon and Walsh for the WC is not understandable
in the least. Was there a official reason given after they were 
dropped ?. If they were, I do not think anybody posted on the net
about this.  ( There was some talk about Walsh not being considered
because of 87' WC trauma during Pak-WI match ). On top of all this,
they have not been taken for the SA tour too. 

I wonder how much dust the whole thing would have kicked up on the 
r.s.c if this was happening to India. The West-Indian board,their 
selection procedures remain shrouded in mystery. Also it would be
interesting to see if they are playing Local Cricket in the Caribbean.

Anyone in r.s.c with the above info can be of a great help. With the
full strength, WI would have been hard to beat in the WC.


Venky VivForVictory
From: sidi@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Sadiq Yusuf)
Subject: WI/SA OD international (WI inning)
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:32:59 GMT

Hi all,
	Just got a personal message from KS Rao, he's been busy and hasn't
been able to send updates (he'll try to send some from 4:30 onwards, and
for the games Saturday and Sunday).
	Anyway, WI got 288 for 6 from their 50 overs. Simmons scored 123 off
113 balls, and Lara 60 off 68. Thats all I know.

	Sadiq [ like old Hermes, the messenger of the Gods ] Yusuf
From: patb@lazy.helios.nd.edu (Pathikrit Bandyopadhyay)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Popularity of Cricket
Date: 7 Apr 92 18:53:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Apr7.185325.2714
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame

In article <3q2trrd@rpi.edu> cheriv@nason110.its.rpi.edu (Vinay M. Cherian) writes:
>
>Where would cricket be ranked in terms of popularity?
>
>Would it come second, after Soccer??
>Just curious,
>
>Vinay

in which country ?