HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk (the Crisco Kid)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: A de-muffinning, and a coming out
Date: 26 Aug 92 18:23:01 GMT
Organization: Eris's Restaurant

In article <1992Aug26.102932.1@oread.cc.ukans.edu> matthew@oread.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>In article <awlpbr9p@cck.coventry.ac.uk>, idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk (the Crisco Kid) writes:
>> Matt! you're back! <hug> <smooch> <nibble> <nibble> <lick> <hug> <smooch>
>> Good to see you again...
>	Kay, darling!  You didn't get to see my "Matt Chatterly
>Returns" post?  Well, I'd be happy to repeat it...in cyber-person....
><kiss> <hug> <smooch> <nibble> <nibble>...(repeat until sated)

No, alas: news expires here in three or less days, and, what with being
occupied (Tanaqui will no doubt spot the joke) at the weekends, sometimes
things do just slip away...  In cyberperson?  Are you another Furry
person?

>	Darling, you mean you didn't hear?  Oh, I decided that we'd
>try different things this week, and I just thought of you!  Where's
>the butter...or need I ask? :)

My mind is filled with a blended reminiscence of the Mad Hatter's
Teaparty and "Last Tango in Paris" <giggle>

>> Just wait till I've got you harnessed to my Iris, denims razored away
>> from your legs, body coated with sweat and beer... Oh? not *that* sort
>> of dungeon?  Aww...
>	O.K.--what's your Iris?  When did you get this?  <sniff>

Two yummy colour workstations.  Silicon Graphics machines.  They're for
my research project (though that doesn't stop them being used for other
purposes...)

>Didn't show me!  And hey!  Those were my favorite denim jeans...wait a
>minute!

Ah, you'd have been most welcome if you'd dropped by to look at them.
Especially when I had that set of thumbcuffs on my desk...

><kiss>

<slurp>

>	That's perfect for my outfit for Halloween!  Oh, Kay, you're
>good at reading my mind!  But no beer on this body--sweat yes, but if
>you want a good alcoholic beverage on me, I happen to have a case of
>champagne in my locker over here in my corner of the net.room.  Go
>ahead...pour away!  (and if you don't like the taste, I'm sure we
>could find something better! :)

No beer?  Ah well, there *is* something of the Marquis in deluging the
inhabitants of my dungeon in champers... but it'll have to be a decent
vintage Veuve Cliquot, I tell you; none of this non-vint Moet <shudder>
thank you very much...

About the only thing M&C is any use for is champagne enemata; ever tried?
All those bubbles...

				Kay

-- 
6'2", dark short hair, blue eyes, bisexual and horny as ....
Kay Dekker, Dept of Industrial Design, Coventry University, Coventry UK
37 Old Winnings Road, Keresley Village, Coventry   |B0 f t+ g++ k++! s+ e r p!
Phone: +44 203 838668 (work) +44 203 337865 (home) |Deflowerer-of-innocents
From: jcr_murd@csd.bristol-poly.ac.uk (Justin Murdock)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Lemmings!
Date: 2 Sep 92 18:02:57 GMT
	<1992Aug27.164224.23357@rat.csc.calpoly.edu>
	<1992Aug28.015948.49569@ccvax.ucd.ie>
Organization: University of WOE, Bristol

Eeek, lemmings!

I have never played for more than four hours at a time, so that must
prove that I was not addicted.

Has anybody ported it for X windows yet? ;-)

--
24 hour news expiry. Please mail copies of follow-ups you want me to reply to.
In the event of CSD returned mail, please try later / the next day. Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------V 2.1--
Justin Murdock                  18 Stanbury Avenue,  |B0 f- t- w g+ k+ s+ e r p
jcr_murd@csd.brispoly.ac.uk     Fishponds,           | I'm buggered if I know
+44 272 575910                  Bristol.  BS16  5AN  |  what this lot means!
Newsgroups: soc.bi,alt.polyamory
From: jennifer@algol.astro.Virginia.EDU (Jennifer Wesp)
Subject: Re: alt.personals and enforced monogamy
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 00:59:24 GMT

JB <jbl@mesaadm.cre.nt.com> writes:
>John Clark, jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu writes:
>>One of these days even in SD I expect there will be sections like,
>>men looking for other romantic men, couples looking for romantic
>>others, women looking for other romantic women, etc.

>Our local mag with personals has sections Men Seeking Women and vice
>versa, and Other Personals.  This sections includes married people openly
>seeking diversions, gays, and couples seeking.  Although there was a fury
>of letters to the editor, the mag stands by its policy.  Their
>corresponding "ask Esther" even set up three different singles meets,
>hetero, femme-femme, and male-male.  And all this from the bible belt
>yet!  There is hope.

Whaaaaaa.  Here on Long Island (Yes, I am not where I seem to be...)
the personals are exclusively for single men looking for singe women,
or vice versa.  No women wanting women, men wanting men or
gender-free seeking gender-free people.  *sigh*  I want to go back to
the west coast.  I liked the west coast.  Can I please go back?
Please?  

-jennifer

Newsgroups: soc.bi,alt.polyamory
From: asuccop@milton.u.washington.edu (Annemarie Succop)
Subject: Re: Bi pamphlet - enough already! 8->
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 23:28:25 GMT

cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:

>In <asuccop.715337770@milton> asuccop@milton.u.washington.edu
>(Annemarie Succop) writes:

>>	nice pamphlet!

>Seconded.

>Constructive criticisms:

>>>Q. Doesn't being interested in both genders mean they're only half 
>>>as interested in either?
>>>
>>>A. Most Bisexuals will probably say that when they're interested 
>>>in someone, they're interested in them 100%. Just like you & I.
>>
>>	'just like people who are exclusively interested in one gender' might
>>	make more sense here; not *everyone* who reads this pamphlet is
>>	bisexual; why assume so here?

>Actually, I read it that the pamphlet is assuming that the reader is
>straight (and strangely enough, that the person who wrote the
>pamphlet is also straight).

	er, *blush*, i *meant* to say, 'not everyone who reads this
	pamphelt is monosexual; why assume so here?'

>Ciaran.
>-- 
>Ciaran McHale                                                             ----
>Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.       \bi/
>Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-772204 email: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie \/

	annemarie
From: pflynn@ccvax.ucd.ie (Peter Flynn, Official Muffin-sampler)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Appreciate Me Now and Avoid the Rush!
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:38:09 GMT
Organization: University College Dublin

In article <25389@castle.ed.ac.uk>, sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing) writes:
>>In article <iw.714937735@tosser>, iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Iseult White) writes:
>>> So, Sara, when do I get my little mercy package of proper chocolate.
>>> 
>>> Although Fiona expertly sniffed out some Cadburys Flakes (made in
>>> Coolock, Dublin, Ireland <sniff> homesickness..) a couple of days ago,
>>> so I guess the need is not so urgent. 
> 
> Mail me if you want stuff, Iseult!  

Whoa! There's a major taste difference between Cadbury's made here and 
Cadbury's made in the UK. When Cadbury's UK changed from the flat 8-square
bar in the UK (many years ago) to the thicker, narrower one, they also
changed the formula and the taste. Goddess be praised, they left the irish
one and formula unchanged (innate conservatism of the Irish consumer?).
Perhaps we should both send samples for tasting, as the formula seems to
apply to all their products.

///Peter
Xref: sparky soc.bi:11826 alt.polyamory:1164
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing)
Newsgroups: soc.bi,alt.polyamory
Subject: Re: Bi pamphlet - enough already! 8->
Date: 3 Sep 92 14:44:01 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

bethan@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Bethan Davies) writes:

>In article <1992Sep1.111730.23582@dsg.cs.tcd.ie> cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:

>>correct word is "sex". However, in this case I think it is valid to say
>>"fuck the linguists (especially the cute ones:-)!" and continue to
>           ^^^^^^^^^

>Do *I* count ....?      <innocent look>

If you do then that makes you a mathematician, sorry ...

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)     Sara Hopkins     (-8}<              _____^__
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St. \ OOO/ / The Thing
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662 \++/ /   From
 >{8-) sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk (-8}<                \/\/ The Swamp
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: hot bi babes
From: pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 06:23:58 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) wrote...
>>>>[Other possible responses to the 'Oh you're bi - can I have sex with you?'
>>>>come ons:]
>>>>[...]
>A response I thought of this morning...
>
>	"Bisexual, huh? want to come by my tent later?"
>	(all this without looking at my face, and then a little
>	giggle at the end, as if to imply that he's just joking,
>	so I shouldn't be offended.)
>
>	"Don't be silly. Even *I* have my standards. <giggle>"

Then there's the miss the point [almost] entirely approach.

"Bisexual, huh? want to come by my tent later?"
"Oh you're bi too!  That's great.  You really must meet my 
 friend <male name here>.  You'd really like him."

Ellen
From: ELAINE@brownvm.brown.edu (Elaine M. Brennan)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Cool Spots for Bis (Was the War Between Us
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 21:31:11 EDT
Organization: Brown University - Providence, Rhode Island  USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: brownvm.brown.edu
News-Software: BNN via BNN_POST v1.0 beta

In article <1992Aug23.210903.23787@rat.csc.calpoly.edu>,
pclary@radish.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) said:

>That wouldn't happen to be the one of vanilla Sara bending over a
>newsrack on the street with STella behind her with whip poised
>overhead....  Would it?  (This must be giffed! - Someone wrestle
>Sara's pictures away from her when she gets back to Edin<mutter>.)
>
>Ellen
>[Yes I took that picture.]
>[Elaine - I want some copies too!]

yup ... (so I *tried* to keep it a secret, Sara ... get back at
Ellen, not at me!)

so, what are *you* doing on Saturday Ellen?

Elaine
From: sbit37@uxb.liv.ac.uk (Paul Gould)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Who am I anyway?
Date: 27 Aug 92 09:06:58 GMT
Organization: The University of Liverpool
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

the Crisco Kid (idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk) wrote:
>In article <18071@acorn.co.uk> osmith@acorn.co.uk (Owen Smith) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug25.210255.15629@cbnews.cb.att.com>
>>eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (eleanor.j.evans) writes:
>>>>Owen pp Gwendolin (long legged lesbian with freckles)
>>>P.S.  I don't follow your name--is that "Owen app Gwendolin", as
>>No. I don't know what the pp stands for, but "Owen pp Gwendolin" means
>>"Owen writing on behalf of Gwendolin".
>
>"Per (et) pro": for, and on behalf of, ...
>
Umm, I thought it was "per procurationem": through the auspices of, by
proxy of...

>Don't they teach business writing and Latin in the schools no more?
>
Business writing, no; Latin, yes. Well, actually, mine was the last year
for whom latin was compulsory up to 'O' Level.

>				Kay

Paul
--
Paul Gould                            ____              Dept of Biochemistry
sbit37@uk.ac.liv.uxb (JANET)          \bi/              University of Liverpool
sbit37@uxb.liv.ac.uk (Internet)        \/               PO Box 147, Liverpool
+44 (0)51-794 4330   (Phone)                            L69 3BX  UK
From: asl2@quads.uchicago.edu (Aaron "Fish" Lav)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Lovely things found in my mailbox
Date: 30 Aug 92 05:12:39 GMT
Reply-To: asl2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Mold Feeders Anonymous

In article <1992Aug30.031254.2616@midway.uchicago.edu> h431@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1992Aug28.203408.8207@midway.uchicago.edu> orc@usite-next.uchicago.edu (David Parsons) writes:
>>
>>   So I come home from work early today, because I want to make my
>>terminal emulator even sillier, and what do I find in my mailbox?
>>Why, it's an INVITATION from the American Nazi^H^H^H^HRepublican
>>party; they want me to attend a reception for Maggie Thatcher on
>>the 17'th of September, and/or join the Presidential Roundtable
>>(for a nominal $5000 yearly fee!)
...
>>   What I'd like to do is send them a sweet little letter saying that
>>I don't give money to Nazis, 
>
>Why don't you?  You can use the postage-paid envelope they sent you.
>You might want to include something heavy in it.  Like a brick.

Nice sentiment, but according to the index entry for "business reply cards,
advisability of returning affixed to brick" in _More Of The Straight Dope_,
by Cecil Adams:
"According to rule 917.243(b) in the _Domestic Mail Manual_, when a business
reply card is "improperly used as a label" ... the post office can heave it
into the trash without further ado."

It'd be a shame if they never got to read your letter, David, knowing how
sweetly you write...
(Followups to comp.mail.heavy-objects?)
-- 
                                Aaron |><>
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Disturbed
From: pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 03:53:11 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) wrote...
>In <18040@acorn.co.uk> osmith@acorn.co.uk (Owen Smith) writes:
>>Someone I know of (but never met) has recently commited suicide, and it's
>>had rather an unsettling affect on me. Oh I'm not suicidal myself, but I'm
>>disturbed to find for the first time that I understand why someone might do
>>that, why they just can't face whatever is getting them down any longer.
>>[...] In the past I've always been of the "how could anyone do that?"
>>school of thought.
>
>I also used to be of that same school of thought ...
>I wasn't suicidal, but I knew that I _could_ be if my depression didn't
>lift soon.

(More suicide-related postings.  Hmmmmmm.  Well I guess I might as
well out myself on this one.)

As someone who used to be quite suicidal, I've always been a little 
amazed (perhaps envious, perhaps not) at those who a) have never felt
suicidal and don't understand it b) aren't suicidal persay but
can more or less understand how it might happen.  To me those
perspectives are as foriegn to me as heterosexual perspectives.
Have to go think about this one (haven't done so in a long while.)

(As Owen said:  Please no 'Don't kill yourself' email.  This is
 old history.)
Ellen

Newsgroups: soc.bi,ba.motss
From: phoenixl@netcom.com (Scott Luebking)
Subject: seeking German translator in Bay Area
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 14:53:08 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 


Someone has recently sent me a couple of German articles on a bi/gay
organization in the Netherlands.  Unfortunately, my German skills
are pretty non-existent.  Could someone help translate these
articles for me?

Thanks very much.
-- 
Scott Luebking
phoenixl@netcom.com
From: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk (Clive Grace)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Owen
Date: 23 Aug 92 10:30:00 GMT
Reply-To: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk



[Ciaran] cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie writes:

>It is very easy to read the discussions on soc.bi and think that all
>the posters are perfectly at ease with themselves (and especially their
>sexuality). While this is probably true for some people, I know several
>people here (certainly myself included) who are _not_ totally at ease
>with ourselves and who find participating in soc.bi to be quite
>therapeutic. 

...and not just about bisexual issues either, the more I've explored my
feelings about bisexuality, the more I've become aware that there are
thousands of associated subjects that brought me to this particular
state of mind -- and many of them need working through -- for example,
before soc.bi and meeting someone very special, I *never* thought about indepe-
ndence, body politics, letting go of old constraints, change,
acceptance... you'll see these subjects continually crop up here and
in other alt and soc groups, but I've just approached them from the
bisexual perspective, which is why I post them here. 

Soc.bi has made me be aware of just how resilient and diverse the human
spirit really is, it's made me aware that we are not odd or unusual, and
that we are not alone. I may not agree with all of the points raised here,
but it's so much better to disagree with someone whom you care about than
with someone you despise, and that's how I view everyone here, you're all
a big family. Some members go, new ones join... I may cry when I think of
some people I may never meet again leaving the net, or of people I've
never met who, even though they've gone, still their words live in me, but
that's just the way it happens in real life.

Life's too short to go around unaccepting the diversity of human nature.
To me, bisexuality is part of enjoying and rejoicing in that diversity.

<Hugs>

+----------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
|sometimes love hurts me so bad I feel like    |cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk|
|I'm in pain, then I realise I've been in pain |cliveg@cix.compulink.uucp |
|all my life -- looking for someone to love.   +--------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------+
Xref: sparky soc.bi:11767 alt.polyamory:1140
From: woodhous@latcs2.lat.oz.au (Joe P Woodhouse)
Newsgroups: soc.bi,alt.polyamory
Subject: Re: Bi pamphlet - enough already! 8->
Date: 2 Sep 92 06:14:23 GMT
Followup-To: soc.bi,alt.polyamory
Organization: Comp Sci, La Trobe Uni, Australia

asuccop@milton.u.washington.edu (Annemarie Succop) writes:
>	nice pamphlet!

   Thanks! I was *so* nervous about posting it... 8->

>woodhous@latcs2.lat.oz.au (Joe P. Woodhouse) writes:
>[from a Bi pamphlet]
>>"I'm attracted to women, but I can't be a lesbian because I'm still 
>>attracted to men...what am I?" is a typical question.
>
>	this is great!  describes me perfectly :)

   We'd seen a question almost exactly like this in one of the trashy
magazines Karina indulges in when she's pampering herself. Sparked a
whole train of thought, and a lot of anger at the harm done to Bi people
through invisibility.


>>Q. Doesn't being interested in both genders mean they're only half 
>>as interested in either?
>
>>A. Most Bisexuals will probably say that when they're interested 
>>in someone, they're interested in them 100%. Just like you & I.
>
>	'just like people who are exclusively interested in one gender' might
>	make more sense here; not *everyone* who reads this pamphlet is
>	bisexual; why assume so here?

   Actually, if anything I was assuming a *non*-Bi audience, there. 
The idea was to try to relate how Bi's feel to what everyone else feels.


>>Q. But surely they're just confused, they haven't made up their 
>>minds yet?
>
>>A. Don't make the mistake of assuming there are only 2 options to 
>>choose from. Bisexuality is an option in its own right. A lack of 
>>information about Bisexuality is probably the cause of most 
>>confusion a bisexual might feel.
>	
>	this 'confusion' line is probably the best one in this pamphlet...

   Yeah, I liked it... 8->


>>Q. Suppose I have - does that mean I'm bisexual too?
>
>>A. Strictly speaking, maybe. But what you call yourself is up to 
>>you. Some may feel the attraction they feel for one gender isn't 
>>enough to call themselves Bisexual. Some people have other 
>>reasons for not identifying as Bisexual as well.
>
>	this is a really relaly good point. yu could *possibly* include
>	the mostly exclusively gay or straight people who feel that their
>	biaffectional feelings translate into a bisexual identity..

   Well, we were being really careful not to tread on anyone's toes.
We've had GL people we've met (who know we're Bi activists) get very
hostile with us because they assume we're trying to invalidate their
identities. And since we *weren't* doing that, it was worth a mention.


>	thank you, joe!

   <blush>

Joe.

  / Joe Woodhouse        / I'm just a sweet bisexual...   / Hello, there.
 / Latrobe University   /    (think - Rocky Horror)      / Threesomes are fun.
/ Melbourne, Australia / Music. Magic. Mathematics. Me. / I like cats! (miaow!)
From: iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Sults)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: 101 ways to tackle sexual harassment?
Date: 28 Aug 92 14:59:52 GMT

pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:


>But back to impractical... 
[ ways to come out as bi]

>Arrange for all queer's skin color to turn pink or lavendar.
>You could even have gay's turn one color and bi's another,
>or varying shades of lavendar (though this runs counter to
>X% motos attraction + Y% motss attraction = 100% bi)
>May sure this happens suddenly overnight.

So thats what Sara was doing while she was over here.


Iseult.
From: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk (Clive Grace)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: The Great Graham Crackers Deba(cle)te
Date: 26 Aug 92 22:55:00 GMT
Reply-To: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk



[Kay - (the thought-Poet) writes:]

>Hah! *You* get digestive biscuit crumbs under your foreskin and see
>how your sexual appetite dwindles...

<Looks sheepish and hurt>
B...but Ellen only gave me the cheesecake recipe s..so she could say 
"thanks for letting me stay a coupla nights"... 

Aren't we presuming something? Hmmmm? Although I know of two people here (poss-
ibly three?) that know if I have been or not :-)

+----------------------------------------------+----------------------+
| Floor Shows R Us                             |cliveg@compulink.co.uk|
|                - aint that right you three?  |cliveg@compulink.uucp |
+----------------------------------------------+----------------------+

Oooh - how much more info can he give away?
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: orc@usite-next.uchicago.edu (David Parsons)
Subject: Re: The ??? Between Us
Keywords: *DeFlower* ME will you...
Organization: Ministry of Skritching
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 21:33:18 GMT

In article <1992Aug23.204440.186143@zeus.calpoly.edu> cjohnson@zeus.calpoly.edu (Coe Salzgeber) writes:
|pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) said...
|>If you haven't guessed, Orc admits to being a wee bit implusive...
|Proposing marriage, flying about the country at the slightest 
|provocation (should try being a planespotter) <duck>
|And what was it that he bought at that record store?  Something he
|admitted to really not needing, as i recall.

   Well, it was vinyl, so it's good to have anyway (speaking of unusable
purchases - I bought 4 LPs, and I don't have a turntable yet [the problem
being that I'm one of those audiophile types, too, and the turntables I
tend to ogle are priced in the "Two trips to Australia or three trips to
the UK with a side trip to Seattle" category, so when I finally get enough
money to *buy one of them, well, it's already committed to something else.)

  However, the *Really* *Big* *Whisk*, now that's something that's got
immediate and practical uses, at least if I can avoid giggling....

                __
  david parsons \/ orc@pell.chi.il.us
From: pflynn@ccvax.ucd.ie (Peter Flynn, Official Muffin-sampler)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Punts
Date: 26 Aug 92 01:18:48 GMT
Organization: University College Dublin

In article <18034@acorn.co.uk>, osmith@acorn.co.uk (Owen Smith) writes:
> In article <1992Aug25.005536.14816@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
> bx304@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jeff Epler) writes:
> 
>>Just *what* is punting???
> 
> You stand on the back of a rather flat boat - the punt (sort of like a cross
[explanation]

There's also the motto for addicts of Spoonerisms:

   "Never kiss in punts"

///Peter
From: gtoal@ibmpcug.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Lemmings!
Date: 31 Aug 92 17:23:31 GMT
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.

In article <1992Aug28.015948.49569@ccvax.ucd.ie> pflynn@ccvax.ucd.ie (Peter Flynn, Official Muffin-sampler) writes:
>In that case, pass them on. I'm not at Mayhem yet. BTW are there any queer
>games for the PC, Mac or whatever? Leisure-Suit Laura, perhaps? Titris?

Aren't the Mario Bros gay?  I'm sure I remember seeing a clip from some
US TV show with live-people Mario Bros who were outrageously camp.

G
--