H-Huang/complex_word_identification huggingface dataset:
Normally , the land will be passed down to future generations in a way that recognizes the community 's traditional connection to that country .
Target word: Normally — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: passed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: land — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: future — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: future generations — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: generations — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: recognizes — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: community — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: traditional — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: traditional connection to that country — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: country — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: connection — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
The passing of Aboriginal land rights legislaton in Australia was preceded by a number of important Aboriginal protests , including the 1946 Aboriginal Stockmen 's Strike , the 1963 Yolngu Bark Petition , and the 1966 Wave Hill Walk-Off , as well as the Aboriginal Lands Trust Act 1966 ( SA ) , which established the South Australian Aboriginal Lands Trust .
Target word: Aboriginal — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: passing — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aboriginal land rights legislaton — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: land rights legislaton — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: land — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: legislaton — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.75)
Target word: rights — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: preceded — judged complex by 8 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.7)
Target word: Australia — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aboriginal — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: number — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: important — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aboriginal protests — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Stockmen — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: protests — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: including — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aboriginal — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Strike — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Yolngu — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Yolngu Bark Petition — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Petition — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
The passing of Aboriginal land rights legislaton in Australia was preceded by a number of important Aboriginal protests , including the 1946 Aboriginal Stockmen 's Strike , the 1963 Yolngu Bark Petition , and the 1966 Wave Hill Walk-Off , as well as the Aboriginal Lands Trust Act 1966 ( SA ) , which established the South Australian Aboriginal Lands Trust .
Target word: Bark — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Wave Hill Walk-Off  — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Wave — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Walk-Off — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: Hill — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aboriginal Lands Trust Act — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aboriginal — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Trust — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Lands — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: established — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.35)
Target word: Act — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: SA — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: South — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Australian — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aboriginal — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Lands — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Trust — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
However , it was not until the 1970s , when indigenous Australians ( both Australian Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders ) became more politically active , that there emerged powerful movement for the recognition of Aboriginal land rights .
Target word: indigenous — judged complex by 8 of 10 native annotators and 8 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.8)
Target word: However — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: indigenous Australians — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Australian Aborigines — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Australians — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Australian — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Australian Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Torres Strait — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Aborigines — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Torres — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Strait — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Islanders — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: politically — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: emerged — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: active — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: movement — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: powerful — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: recognition — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: Aboriginal — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Aboriginal land rights — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: land — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: rights — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Her novel The Good Earth was the best-selling fiction book in the U.S. in 1931 and 1932 and won the Pulitzer Prize in 1932 .
Target word: novel — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: best-selling — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: Good — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Earth — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: fiction — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: Pulitzer — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: book — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: won — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Pulitzer Prize — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Prize — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
In 1921 , Buck 's mother died of a tropical disease , sprue , and shortly afterward her father moved in .
Target word: tropical — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.6)
Target word: Buck — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: mother — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: died — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: tropical disease — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: disease — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: sprue — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: afterward — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: shortly — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: father — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: moved — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
From 1920 to 1933 , the Bucks made their home in Nanjing , on the campus of the University of Nanking , where both had teaching positions .
Target word: campus — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: Bucks — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: made — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: home — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Nanjing — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: positions — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: University — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Nanking — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: teaching — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
In 1964 , to support children who were not eligible for adoption , Buck established the Pearl S. Buck Foundation ( now called Pearl S. Buck International ) to `` address poverty and discrimination faced by children in Asian countries . ''
Target word: eligible — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.35)
Target word: support — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: children — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: adoption — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: established — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: Buck — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Foundation — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Pearl — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Buck — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: address — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: called — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Pearl — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Buck — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: International — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: poverty — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: discrimination — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 8 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.9)
Target word: faced — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: children — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Asian — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: countries — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
She wrote on a diverse variety of topics including women 's rights , Asian cultures , immigration , adoption , missionary work , and war .
Target word: diverse — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: wrote — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: diverse variety — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: variety — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: cultures — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: topics — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: including — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: women — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: rights — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Asian — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: immigration — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 7 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.6)
Target word: adoption — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: missionary — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: missionary work — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: work — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: war — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Another Baroque piece that stands is the Chapel of Nuestra Señora del Rosario , which is a recognizable feature of the architecture of Quito .
Target word: Baroque — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: Baroque piece — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: that stands — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: piece — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Chapel — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: stands — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Chapel of Nuestra Señora del Rosario — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Nuestra Señora del Rosario — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Nuestra — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: recognizable — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.6)
Target word: Señora — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: del — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Rosario — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: recognizable feature — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: feature — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: architecture — judged complex by 8 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: Quito — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
El Panecillo is a hill located in the middle west of the city at an altitude of about 3,016 metres ( 9,895 ft ) above sea level .
Target word: Panecillo — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: El — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: hill — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: altitude — judged complex by 8 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: located — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: middle — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: west — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: city — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: sea level — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: metres — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: ft — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: sea — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: level — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)