H-Huang/complex_word_identification huggingface dataset:
They occupy the mass range between the heaviest gas giants and the lightest stars , with an upper limit around 75 to 80 Jupiter masses ( MJ ) .
Target word: occupy — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: mass — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: mass range — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: range — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: heaviest — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: gas giants — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: gas — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: lightest — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: giants — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: upper — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: stars — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Jupiter — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: limit — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: masses — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: MJ — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
High-quality spectral data acquired by the Keck 1 telescope in November 1995 showed that Teide 1 had kept the initial lithium amount of the original molecular cloud from which Pleiades stars formed , proving the lack of thermonuclear fusion in its core .
Target word: High-quality spectral data — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: High-quality — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: spectral — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: spectral data — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: acquired — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: data — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Keck — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: telescope — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: Teide — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: November — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: showed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: initial — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: lithium — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: original — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: amount — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: original molecular cloud — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: molecular — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.4)
Target word: molecular cloud — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: Pleiades — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: cloud — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: thermonuclear — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: stars — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
High-quality spectral data acquired by the Keck 1 telescope in November 1995 showed that Teide 1 had kept the initial lithium amount of the original molecular cloud from which Pleiades stars formed , proving the lack of thermonuclear fusion in its core .
Target word: formed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: proving — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: lack — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: thermonuclear fusion — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: fusion — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: core — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
In 1995 , the study of brown dwarfs changed substantially with the discovery of two incontrovertible substellar objects ( Teide 1 and Gliese 229B ) , which were identified by the presence of the 670.8 nm lithium line .
Target word: brown dwarfs — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: study — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: brown — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: dwarfs — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: substantially — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: changed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: incontrovertible — judged complex by 9 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.75)
Target word: discovery — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: incontrovertible substellar — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: incontrovertible substellar objects — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: substellar — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: substellar objects — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: Gliese — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: objects — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Teide — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: presence — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: identified — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: lithium — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: nm — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: line — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Nonetheless , one school of thought is based on formation ; another , on physics in the interior .
Target word: Nonetheless — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: school of thought — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: school — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: formation — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: thought — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: based — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: physics — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: interior — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Currently , it is marketed in Belgium , Brazil , Hong Kong , Italy , Japan , Luxembourg , Macau , Morocco , Netherlands , Peru , Portugal , Spain and Taiwan and the majority of its consumers are non-athletes .
Target word: Currently — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: marketed — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.35)
Target word: Luxembourg — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: Belgium — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Brazil — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Hong — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Kong — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Italy — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Japan — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: majority — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: Macau — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Morocco — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Netherlands — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Peru — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Portugal — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Spain — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Taiwan — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: majority of its consumers — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: consumers — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: non-athletes — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Aquarius is available in the following flavors : Carrot Orange , Citrus Blend , Grapefruit , Honey Lemon , Lemon , Orange , Watermelon and Coca-Cola .
Target word: Aquarius — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: available — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: flavors — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: Blend — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Carrot — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Orange — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Citrus — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Grapefruit — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Honey — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Lemon — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Lemon — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Orange — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Watermelon — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Coca-Cola — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
An archivist ( `` AR-kiv-ist '' or `` AR-kive-ist '' ) is a professional who assesses , collects , organizes , preserves , maintains control over , and provides access to information determined to have long-term value .
Target word: archivist — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.4)
Target word: AR-kiv-ist — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: AR-kive-ist — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: professional — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: assesses — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: organizes — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: collects — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: preserves — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: maintains — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: provides — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: control — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: provides access to — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: access — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: determined — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: information — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: long-term — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: long-term value — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
The information maintained by an archivist can be any form of media ( photographs , video or sound recordings , letters , documents , electronic records , etc. ) .
Target word: information — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: maintained — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: archivist — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: media — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: form — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: photographs — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: recordings — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: video — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: sound — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: documents — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: letters — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: electronic — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: electronic records — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: records — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Diffraction occurs with all waves , including sound waves , water waves , and electromagnetic waves such as visible light , X-rays and radio waves .
Target word: Diffraction — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 10 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 1.0)
Target word: occurs — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: electromagnetic — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.65)
Target word: waves — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: including — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: sound — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: waves — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: water — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: waves — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: electromagnetic waves — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: waves — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: visible — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: X-rays — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: light — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: radio waves — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: radio — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: waves — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Ellison co-founded Oracle Corporation in 1977 with Bob Miner and Ed Oates under the name Software Development Laboratories ( SDL ) .
Target word: co-founded — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: Ellison — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Oracle — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Oracle Corporation — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Software — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Corporation — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Bob — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Miner — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Ed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Oates — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Software Development Laboratories — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Development — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Laboratories — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: SDL — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)