H-Huang/complex_word_identification huggingface dataset:
During the 2000s , Romania implemented a number of reforms to prepare for EU accession , including the consolidation of its democratic systems , the institution of the rule of law , the acknowledgement of respect for human rights , the commitment to personal freedom of expression , and the implementation of a functioning free-market economy .
Target word: implemented — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.6)
Target word: Romania — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: reforms — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: number — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: EU accession — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: prepare — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: EU — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: accession — judged complex by 9 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.7)
Target word: consolidation — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 7 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.85)
Target word: including — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: democratic — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: democratic systems — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: systems — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: institution — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: rule of law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: rule — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: acknowledgement — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: commitment — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: respect — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: human — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
During the 2000s , Romania implemented a number of reforms to prepare for EU accession , including the consolidation of its democratic systems , the institution of the rule of law , the acknowledgement of respect for human rights , the commitment to personal freedom of expression , and the implementation of a functioning free-market economy .
Target word: rights — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: expression — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: personal — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: freedom — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: implementation — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.4)
Target word: functioning — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: functioning free-market economy — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: free-market — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: free-market economy — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: economy — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Acherontia atropos is the most widely-known of the three species of Death 's - head Hawk moth .
Target word: Acherontia — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Acherontia atropos — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.35)
Target word: atropos — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: widely-known — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: head Hawk moth — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: species — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Death — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: head — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Hawk moth — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Hawk — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: moth — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
It often accompanies this sound with flashing its brightly marked abdomen in a further attempt to deter its predators .
Target word: accompanies — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: flashing — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: sound — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: abdomen — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: brightly — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: marked — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: deter — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: attempt — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: predators — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 9 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Unlike the other species of Acherontia , it only attacks colonies of the well-known Western honey bee , Apis mellifera .
Target word: species — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Acherontia — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: colonies — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: attacks — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Apis mellifera — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: well-known — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Western — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: honey — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: bee — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Apis — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: mellifera — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
It is able to move about in hives unmolested because it mimics the scent of the bees .
Target word: hives — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: move — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: hives unmolested — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: unmolested — judged complex by 8 of 10 native annotators and 9 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.85)
Target word: mimics — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: scent — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: bees — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Today , GD 165B is recognized as the prototype of a class of objects now called `` L dwarfs '' .
Target word: recognized — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Today — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: GD — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: recognized as the prototype — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: prototype — judged complex by 9 of 10 native annotators and 10 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.95)
Target word: L dwarfs — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: class — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: objects — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: called — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: dwarfs — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Most failed to live up to their candidacy , however , because the absence of lithium showed them to be stellar objects .
Target word: Most failed to live up to their candidacy — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Most — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: candidacy — judged complex by 9 of 10 native annotators and 9 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.9)
Target word: failed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: live — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: absence — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: absence of lithium — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: lithium — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: stellar — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 7 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.6)
Target word: showed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: stellar objects — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: objects — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Their strongest emissions are in the infrared ( IR ) spectrum , and ground-based IR detectors were too imprecise at that time to readily identify any brown dwarfs .
Target word: emissions — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 8 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.9)
Target word: strongest — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: infrared — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: infrared ( IR — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: spectrum — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: IR — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: ground-based — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: ground-based IR detectors — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: IR detectors — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: IR — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: detectors — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: imprecise — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 10 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.8)
Target word: readily — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: time — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: brown dwarfs — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: identify — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: brown — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: dwarfs — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
However , such objects were hard to find because they emit almost no visible light .
Target word: emit — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: However — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: objects — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: hard — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: find — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: visible — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: light — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Nature highlighted `` Brown dwarfs discovered , official '' in the front page of that issue .
Target word: highlighted — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Nature — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Brown dwarfs discovered — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Brown — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: dwarfs — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: issue — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: discovered — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: official — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: front — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: page — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
In theory , a brown dwarf below 65 Jupiter masses is unable to burn lithium by thermonuclear fusion at any time during its evolution .
Target word: dwarf — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: theory — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: brown — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Jupiter — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: masses — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: lithium — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: unable — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: burn — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: thermonuclear — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.35)
Target word: thermonuclear fusion — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: fusion — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: evolution — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: time — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Advaita ( literally , non-duality ) is a system of thought where `` Advaita '' refers to the identity of the Self ( Atman ) and the Whole ( Brahman ) .
Target word: Advaita — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.45)
Target word: literally — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: literally , non-duality — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: non-duality — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: identity — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: system — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: thought — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Advaita — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: refers — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: identity of the Self — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Self — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: Brahman — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Atman — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Whole — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
When Maya is removed , there exists ultimately no difference between the Jiva and Brahman ( Isvara ) .
Target word: Maya — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: removed — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: exists — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: ultimately — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: difference — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Jiva — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Brahman — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Isvara — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Mahavakya , or `` the great sentences '' , state the unity of Brahman and Atman .
Target word: Mahavakya — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: sentences — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: great — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: unity — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: state — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Brahman — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Brahman and Atman — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Atman — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)