H-Huang/complex_word_identification huggingface dataset:
It was dubbed the "gag law"((es)) or the "gagging law".
Target word: dubbed — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 10 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.75)
Target word: gag — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: gag law — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: es — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: gagging — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: gagging law — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
The law prohibits "the unauthorized use of images of police officers that might jeopardize their or their family's safety or that of protected facilities or police operations".
Target word: prohibits — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.4)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: unauthorized — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: jeopardize — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 9 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.95)
Target word: images — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: police — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: officers — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: protected — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: family — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: safety — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: facilities — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: operations — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: police — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Judge Joaquim Bosch, Judges for Democracy spokesperson, said: "It is not a law for citizens' security, but a law for the government to avoid citizens’ protests.
Target word: Joaquim Bosch — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Judge — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Joaquim — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Democracy spokesperson — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Bosch — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Judges — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Democracy — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: spokesperson — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: citizens — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: protests — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: security — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: government — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: avoid — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: citizens — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
All opinion polls indicate that the Spanish society is not at all preoccupied by security but by the economic situation and political corruption."
Target word: indicate that the — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: opinion — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: polls — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: preoccupied — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 6 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.65)
Target word: Spanish — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: society — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: economic situation — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: security — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: economic — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: political corruption — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: situation — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: political — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: corruption — judged complex by 5 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.35)
Amnesty International condemned the law in a report: "With threats of fines or threats of being beaten, the government is trying to stigmatize and criminalize people who are just practicing their rights."
Target word: Amnesty International — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Amnesty — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: International condemned — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: International — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: condemned — judged complex by 6 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: threats — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: report — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: to stigmatize — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: fines — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: threats — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: beaten — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: government — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: stigmatize — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 10 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 1.0)
Target word: stigmatize and criminalize — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: criminalize — judged complex by 9 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.55)
Target word: people — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: practicing — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: rights — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Virginia Álvarez, who wrote the report, noted, "instead of listening to their demands, instead of starting a dialogue, authorities are doing everything they can to impede people from protesting".
Target word: Virginia Álvarez — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Virginia — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: instead of listening to their demands — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Álvarez — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: wrote — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: report — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: noted — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: dialogue — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: listening — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: demands — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: starting — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: authorities — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: impede — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 7 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.7)
Target word: impede people from protesting — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: protesting — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: people — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Around fifteen shots were reported fired.
Target word: shots — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: reported — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: fired — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Parker and Ward were killed, while the interviewee, Vicki Gardner, was transported to hospital and underwent surgery for her injuries, later listed in stable condition.
Target word: interviewee — judged complex by 10 of 10 native annotators and 7 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.85)
Target word: Parker — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Ward — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: killed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Vicki Gardner — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Vicki — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: transported — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: Gardner — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: underwent — judged complex by 3 of 10 native annotators and 7 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.5)
Target word: hospital — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: underwent surgery — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: surgery — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: injuries — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: stable — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: listed — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: stable condition — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: condition — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
The gunman, later identified as 41 year-old Vester Lee Flanagan II, fled the scene.
Target word: gunman — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: identified — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: Vester Lee Flanagan — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: year-old — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Vester — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: fled — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 4 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.2)
Target word: Lee — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Flanagan — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: II — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: scene — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
A brief police chase ensued several hours later when law enforcement attempted unsuccessfully to pull Flanagan over on Interstate 66 in Fauquier County.
Target word: brief — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: chase — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 3 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: police — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: ensued — judged complex by 9 of 10 native annotators and 7 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.8)
Target word: law enforcement — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: hours — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: law — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: enforcement — judged complex by 7 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.4)
Target word: enforcement attempted — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: attempted — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.15)
Target word: unsuccessfully — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 2 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.3)
Target word: Flanagan — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: pull — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Interstate — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Fauquier — judged complex by 2 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: County — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Shortly after, Flanagan pulled off the road and shot himself.
Target word: pulled off — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Shortly — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Flanagan — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: pulled — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: road — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: shot — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
He was pronounced dead at a Fairfax-area hospital around 1:30 PM local time (1730 UTC).
Target word: pronounced — judged complex by 8 of 10 native annotators and 5 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.65)
Target word: Fairfax-area — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: dead — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: hospital — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: PM — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: local — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: time — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: UTC — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Flanagan, who reported under the alias "Bryce Williams", was fired by the station in 2013.
Target word: reported — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.05)
Target word: Flanagan — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: alias — judged complex by 4 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.25)
Target word: Bryce Williams — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Bryce — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Williams — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: fired — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: station — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
According to WDBJ president and general manager Jeffrey Marks, speaking to CBS News, Flanagan was "an unhappy man" and "difficult to work with".
Target word: WDBJ — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: According — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Flanagan — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: president — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: general — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: manager — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Jeffrey — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: Marks — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: speaking — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: CBS — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: News — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: difficult — judged complex by 1 of 10 native annotators and 1 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.1)
Target word: unhappy — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: man — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)
Target word: work — judged complex by 0 of 10 native annotators and 0 of 10 non-native annotators (probability complex: 0.0)