On Amendment No 3 to paragraph 2.2, there are misunderstandings in the case of a number of the translations. Vaccination does not have to lead to culling: vaccination simply means that the animals can be used. That was presented in some of the translations as ‘separation’. It simply means that authorisation is given for animals which are vaccinated to be used in the food chain. (Parliament adopted the resolution) *** - Stockholm European Council: Economic and social aspects Joint motion for a resolution(3) on the Stockholm European Council on 23 and 24 March 2001: follow-up to the Lisbon process (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0237/2001) by Mr Goebbels, on behalf of the Group, on the Stockholm European Council on 23 and 24 March 2001: follow-up to the Lisbon process (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Joint motion for a resolution(4) on the outcome of the Stockholm European Council in terms of the Lisbon strategy (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0239/2001) by Mr Gasòliba i Böhm, on behalf of the Group, on the outcome of the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001 (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0240/2001) by Mr Suominen, on behalf of the PPE- Group, on the outcome of the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001 (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0241/2001) by Mr Speroni, on behalf of the TDI Group, on the outcome of the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001 (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0242/2001) by Mrs Hautala and others, on behalf of the Group, on the Stockholm European Council (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0243/2001) by Mr Collins and others, on behalf of the UEN Group, on the outcome of the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001 (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0245/2001) by Mr Wurtz and Mr Schmid, on behalf of the Group, on the economic and social aspects of the Stockholm European Council (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) - Stockholm European Council: Financial markets Motion for a resolution (B5-0244/2001) by Mr von Wogau, on behalf of the PPE- Group, Mr Goebbels and Mrs Randzio-Plath, on behalf of the Group, and Mr Huhne, on behalf of the Group and Mr Jonckheer, on behalf of the Group on the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001 (Parliament adopted the resolution) - Stockholm European Council: Foreign Affairs Motion for a resolution (B5-0248/2001) by Mr Collins and others, on behalf of the UEN Group on the outcome of the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001 (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Motion for a resolution (B5-0251/2001) by Mr Dupuis and others, on behalf of the TDI Group on the Stockholm summit – external relations (foreign affairs policy, including Macedonia and the Middle East) (Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution) Joint motion for a resolution(5) on the outcome of the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001 as regards foreign affairs matters

Political group: Verts-ALE