GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-us-federal-ai-inventory-2024 huggingface dataset:
2_use_case_name: Intelligent National Map project
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: The Intelligent National Map is a vision by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to make mapping smarter by using advanced technology like artificial intelligence (AI). This project aims to create maps that can update themselves automatically, detect changes in the environment, and provide better, faster information for decisions about land, water, and natural resources.
12_outputs: see description
16_dev_stage: Initiated
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Machine-learning model to delineate sub-surface agricultural drainage from satellite imagery
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: We trained a UNet machine-learning model, a convolutional neural network designed to highlight objects of interest within an image, to delineate tile-drain networks in panchromatic satellite imagery without additional data on soils, topography, or historical tile-drain extent. This was done by training the model to match the accuracy of human experts manually tracing the surface representation of tile drains in satellite imagery. Our approach began with a library of images that were used to train and quantify the accuracy of the model, with model performance tested on imagery from two areas that were not used to train the model. Satellite imagery included acquisition dates from 2008 to 2020. Training imagery was from agricultural areas within the US Great Lakes basin. Validation imagery was from the upper Maumee River, tributary to western Lake Erie, and an Indiana, Ohio-River headwater tributary. Our analysis of the satellite imagery paired with meteorological and soil data found that during spring, a combination of relatively high solar radiation, intermediate soil-water content and bare fields enabled the best model performance. Each area of interest was heavily tile-drained, where better understanding the movement of water, nutrients, and sediment from fields to downstream water bodies is key to managing harmful algal blooms and hypoxia. The trained UNet model successfully identified tile drains visible in the validation imagery. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20493
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Environmental streamflows in the United States: historical patterns and predictions
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits:   It is important that environmental streamflow assessments by water managers consider changes in climate, land use, and water management; this cannot be done effectively without understanding historical variability and changes in environmental streamflows. Estimates of environmental streamflows also are needed for ungaged streams and machine-learning methods are likely useful for this. We are analyzing historical change and variability at hundreds of streamflow gages across the United States for a suite of environmental streamflows and using machine-learning methods to estimate environmental streamflows for thousands of ungaged stream reaches.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Acquisition and/or Development
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: PROSPER
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits:   Machine learning approach to estimating the annual probability of streamflow permanence at a sub-reach (10m) scale.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Operation and Maintenance
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Extracting robust, searchable data from narrative geologic descriptions
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: Geosciences and Environmental Change (GEC) Science Center (FEDMAP-funded): Geologic map units are often described in narrative text descriptions. These descriptions sometime contain useful data (e.g., about lithology, unit thickness), but it is hard for users to operationalize that information since is not codified in any standard way. We are using natural language processing and large language models to parse readily queryable information out of thousands of descriptions in a national database of geology.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
33_agency_data: Descriptions of geologic units taken from published reports.


34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Classifying GPS data to understand flight behavior of birds.
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: This project will help understand under what circumstances eagles are more likely to collide with wind turbines.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Whole-lake indexing of round goby abundances with photographic catch data
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: USGS is responsible for monitoring abundances of prey fish across the entirety of the Great Lakes. This project utilizes autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligence to quantify abundances of one of the most abundant prey fishes in the Great Lakes, an invasive species called Round Goby. Robotic surveys of Roung Goby are carried out across three of the five Great Lakes each year. The work also characterizes surface geology, which influence round goby abundances.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Predicting PFAS in shallow soils in northern New England
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: This project leverages statewide shallow soil data and machine learning methods (boosted regression tree models) to predict PFAS in soils across Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Improving accuracy and precision of sonar-based estimates of fish abundance
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: USGS uses sonar to monitoring prey fish populations to support fisheries management decision making for the eight US Great Lakes states, Fish and Wildlife Service, and numerous tribes. Sonar-based estimates of fish abundance are prone to inaccuracies that can limit their utility. New technologies are being strategically cultivated to improve the accuracy and precision of USGS's annual prey fish abundance estimates. Artificial intelligence is being used to accelerate data processing.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
33_agency_data: Sonar transect data collected by conventional vessels and uncrewed surface vehicles
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Machine learning-based landscape feature classification using satellite and airborne imagery
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: We use existing machine learning classifiers on satellite and airborne imagery to enhance the accuracy of habitat and land cover classifications.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.
2_use_case_name: Predicting PFAS occurrence in groundwater using machine learning
3_agency: Department of the Interior
3_abr: DOI
4_bureau: USGS
8_topic_area: Mission-Enabling
10_commercial_ai: None of the above.
11_purpose_benefits: This project leverages USGS groundwater data and machine learning methods (boosted regression tree models) to predict PFAS occurrence in groundwater at the depths of drinking water supplies across the conterminous U.S. A paper with the results of this effort was published in early FY25. A second iteration of this project will aim to predict concentration ranges instead of only occurrence, and commenced at the beginning of FY25.
12_outputs: Outputs were not documented and DOI will update the use cases once additional data is collected from submitter
16_dev_stage: Implementation and Assessment
17_impact_type: Neither
22_dev_method: Developed in-house.
24_hisp_support: No
27_public_info: Yes
28_iqa_compliance: USGS Fundamental Science Practicies Policies
29_contains_pii: No
30_saop_review: No
31_data_catalog: Yes
34_data_docs: Documentation is complete: Documentation exists regarding the maintenance, composition, quality, and intended use of the training and evaluation data, as well as any statistical bias across model features and protected groups. 
37_custom_code: Yes
38_code_access: Yes – agency has access to source code, but it is not public.
40_has_ato: Yes
41_system_name: Science Support System (SSS)
42_dev_tools_wait: Less than 6 months
43_infra_provisioned: Yes
45_compute_request: Yes
47_timely_resources: Yes
49_existing_reuse: Use of existing data platforms: This use case is being developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within the agency rather than procuring additional platforms or SaaS to operate.
50_internal_review: Documentation has been published: Complete documentation has been published to a repository or data catalog within the agency and is made accessible to other data science teams for review and feedback.
51_extension_request: No – Agency did not request an extension for this use case.