Customs Tariff — C-54.011 74
er of (i) the Most-Favoured-Nation Tariff rate of customs duty that was in effect in respect of those goods for the corresponding season immediately before the order is made, and (ii) the Most-Favoured-Nation Tariff rate of customs duty that was in effect in respect of those goods for the corresponding season immediately before the coming into force of this subsection; and (c) in respect of goods other than goods referred to in paragraph (b), make those goods subject to a temporary duty, in addition to any other duty specified in this Act or any other Act of Parliament relating to customs, at a rate set out in the order, but that rate, when added to the rate of customs duty specified in the Korea Tariff that is in effect in respect of those goods at that time, may not exceed the lesser of (i) the Most-Favoured-Nation Tariff rate of customs duty that is in effect in respect of those goods at the time the order is made, and (ii) the Most-Favoured-Nation Tariff rate of customs duty that was in effect in respect of those goods immediately before the coming into force of this subsection. Duration of order under subsection (1) (3) An order under subsection (1) remains in effect for the period that is specified in the order, which shall not exceed two years. However, if the order results from a complaint filed under subsection 23(1.097) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act and an order under subsection (2) has been made in the context of that complaint, the period shall not exceed two years less the number of days during which the order under subsection (2) was in effect. Duration of order under subsection (2) (4) An order under subsection (2) ceases to have effect at the beginning of the two-hundredth day after the day on which the order is made. Exception — negative determination (5) Despite subsection (4), if the inquiry made by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal into the complaint filed under subsection 23(1.097) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act does not result in a finding that the goods that are entitled to the Korea Tariff are, as a result of that entitlement, being imported in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to alone constitute a principal cause of serious injury, or a threat of serious injury, to domestic producers of like or directly competitive goods, (a) the order made under subsection (2) in the context of the same complaint ceases to have effect on the day that the Governor in Council receives the resulting report of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal under subsection 29(3) of that Act, and (b) the Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, by order, refund any surtaxes imposed under the order made under subsection (2). Exception — positive determination (6) Despite subsection (4), if the inquiry made by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal into the complaint filed under subsection 23(1.097) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act results in a finding that the goods that are entitled to the Korea Tariff are, as a result of that entitlement, being imported in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to alone constitute a principal cause of serious injury, or a threat of serious injury, to domestic producers of like or directly competitive goods, the Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, by order, extend the period of the order made under subsection (2) in the context of the same complaint. The total period of the order is not to exceed two years. Extension of order (7) The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, by order, extend the period of an order made under subsection (1) or (2), if it appears to the satisfaction of the Governor in Council, as a result of an inquiry made by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal under section 30.07 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act that the order continues to be necessary to prevent or remedy serious inj