GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 1
1 Section 1 in respect of Canadian National Railways of Order No. R-24328 of February 4, 1977, as amended by Order Nos. R-28953 and R-28954 of June 28, 1979 and Order in Council P.C. 1981-2171 of August 6, 1981 1 , is revoked and the following substituted therefor: 1 SOR/81-892, 1981 Canada Gazette Part II, p. 3352 “1 Canadian National Railways and VIA Rail Canada Inc. shall discontinue the following passenger-train services effective January 15, 1990: (a) Matapédia-Gaspé; and (b) Sydney-Truro-Halifax.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — “1
“1 Canadian National Railways and VIA Rail Canada Inc. shall discontinue the following passenger-train services effective January 15, 1990: (a) Matapédia-Gaspé; and (b) Sydney-Truro-Halifax.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 1
1 Section 1 of Order No. R-41065 of August 28, 1987 is revoked and the following substituted therefor: “1 VIA Rail Canada Inc. and CN shall discontinue operation of the passenger-train service Toronto-North Bay-Kapuskasing effective January 15, 1990.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — “1
“1 VIA Rail Canada Inc. and CN shall discontinue operation of the passenger-train service Toronto-North Bay-Kapuskasing effective January 15, 1990.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 1
1 Section 1 of Order No. R-36619 of May 3, 1984 is revoked and the following substituted therefor: “1 The Applicant shall, effective January 15, 1990, discontinue the Winnipeg-Regina passenger-train service.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — “1
“1 The Applicant shall, effective January 15, 1990, discontinue the Winnipeg-Regina passenger-train service.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 2
2 Section 3 of the said Order is revoked and the following substituted therefor: “3 The Applicant shall, effective January 15, 1990, reduce the frequency of the Winnipeg-Saskatoon via Melville passenger-train service to three times per week in each direction.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — “3
“3 The Applicant shall, effective January 15, 1990, reduce the frequency of the Winnipeg-Saskatoon via Melville passenger-train service to three times per week in each direction.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
P.C. 1990-21  11 January, 1990 (SOR/90-76)
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas the Railway Transport Committee of the Canadian Transport Commission, pursuant to Order No. R-36539 of April 11, 1984, ordered Canadian Pacific Limited (Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Company) and VIA Rail Canada Incorporated not to discontinue the operation of the passenger-train service;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas, pursuant to subsection 272(7) of the National Transportation Act, 1987 * , orders made by the Canadian Transport Commission before the coming into force of section 272 of the said Act continue in force as if the orders were made by the National Transportation Agency;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, by Order in Council P.C. 1989-1974 of October 4, 1989 ** , varied National Transportation Agency Order No. R-36539 of April 11, 1984 in order to discontinue the operation of the Victoria-Courtenay passenger-train service effective January 15, 1990;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas, by way of petition brought by the Attorney General of British Columbia seeking a declaration that Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada has a perpetual obligation to maintain passenger and freight rail service on the line of railway known as the Esquimalt and Nanaimo railway line operated by VIA Rail Canada Incorporated on behalf of Canadian Pacific Limited between Victoria and Courtenay, the Supreme Court of British Columbia declared on December 28, 1989 that Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada has perpetual obligation to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of British Columbia to ensure that passenger and freight rail service is maintained over that part of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo railway line between Victoria and Nanaimo;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas the Attorney General of Canada has given notice to the Attorney General of British Columbia of the intention to appeal the declaration made on December 28, 1989 by the Supreme Court of British Columbia to the Supreme Court of Canada;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
And Whereas, pursuant to section 64 of the National Transportation Act, 1987 * , the Governor in Council may, on the Governor in Council’s own motion, vary any orders of the National Transportation Agency;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — (a)
Therefore, Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Transport, pursuant to section 64 of the National Transportation Act, 1987 * is pleased hereby (a) to revoke Schedule VII to Order in Council P.C. 1989-1974 of October 4, 1989 ** ; and (b) to vary National Transportation Agency Order No. R-36539 of April 11, 1984, effective January 15, 1990 until a subsequent order is made following the completion of the appeal process through the courts, by revoking the last clause thereof and substituting therefor the following: ** SOR/89-488, 1989 Canada Gazette Part II, p. 4350 “1 Canadian Pacific Limited, on behalf of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Company, and VIA Rail Canada Incorporated to continue the operation of the Victoria-Nanaimo portion of the Victoria-Courtenay passenger-train service, effective January 15, 1990, in accordance with the following: VIA Rail Canada Inc. Minimum Frequency Per Week (Each Direction) Segment Track owned by Normal Peak Victoria-Nanaimo EN 6 6 2 Canadian Pacific Limited, on behalf of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Company, and VIA Rail Canada Incorporated to discontinue the operation of the Nanaimo-Courtenay portion of the Victoria-Courtenay passenger-train service, effective January 15, 1990.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — (a)
(a) to revoke Schedule VII to Order in Council P.C. 1989-1974 of October 4, 1989 ** ; and
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — (b)
(b) to vary National Transportation Agency Order No. R-36539 of April 11, 1984, effective January 15, 1990 until a subsequent order is made following the completion of the appeal process through the courts, by revoking the last clause thereof and substituting therefor the following: ** SOR/89-488, 1989 Canada Gazette Part II, p. 4350 “1 Canadian Pacific Limited, on behalf of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Company, and VIA Rail Canada Incorporated to continue the operation of the Victoria-Nanaimo portion of the Victoria-Courtenay passenger-train service, effective January 15, 1990, in accordance with the following: VIA Rail Canada Inc. Minimum Frequency Per Week (Each Direction) Segment Track owned by Normal Peak Victoria-Nanaimo EN 6 6 2 Canadian Pacific Limited, on behalf of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Company, and VIA Rail Canada Incorporated to discontinue the operation of the Nanaimo-Courtenay portion of the Victoria-Courtenay passenger-train service, effective January 15, 1990.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — “1
“1 Canadian Pacific Limited, on behalf of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Company, and VIA Rail Canada Incorporated to continue the operation of the Victoria-Nanaimo portion of the Victoria-Courtenay passenger-train service, effective January 15, 1990, in accordance with the following: VIA Rail Canada Inc. Minimum Frequency Per Week (Each Direction) Segment Track owned by Normal Peak Victoria-Nanaimo EN 6 6
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 2
2 Canadian Pacific Limited, on behalf of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway Company, and VIA Rail Canada Incorporated to discontinue the operation of the Nanaimo-Courtenay portion of the Victoria-Courtenay passenger-train service, effective January 15, 1990.”
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
P.C. 1994-2106  14 December, 1994  (SOR/94-788)
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas Order No. R-38000 of April 29, 1985 and Order No. R-39638 of August 6, 1986 were made by the Railway Transport Committee of the Canadian Transport Commission as it existed on the day immediately before the coming into force of section 272 of the National Transportation Act, 1987 * ;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas, pursuant to subsection 272(7) of that Act, orders made by the Canadian Transport Commission continue in force as if the orders were made by the National Transportation Agency;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Whereas the abandonment of the Canadian Atlantic Railway, on January 1, 1995, requires variance of Order No. R-38000 of April 29, 1985 and Order No. R-39638 of August 6, 1986 to effect changes to VIA Rail Canada Inc.’s eastern transcontinental services;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
And Whereas, pursuant to section 64 of the National Transportation Act, 1987 * , the Governor in Council may, on the Governor in Council’s own motion, vary any order of the National Transportation Agency;
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies
Therefore, His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Transport, pursuant to section 64 of the National Transportation Act, 1987 * , is pleased hereby to vary, effective December 17, 1994, Order No. R-38000 of April 29, 1985 and Order No. R-39638 of August 6, 1986 of the National Transportation Agency, in accordance with the schedule hereto.
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 1
1 Schedule I 1 , Group I, of the Appendix to Order No. R-38000 of April 29, 1985, as amended by Order in Council P.C. 1989-1974 of October 4, 1989, is replaced by the following: 1 SOR/89-488, 1989 Canada Gazette Part II, p. 4350 SCHEDULE /TABLEAU : I Group/Groupe : I Via Rail Canada Inc. MINIMUM FREQUENCY PER WEEK (EACH DIRECTION) FRÉQUENCE MINIMUM PAR SEMAINE (CHAQUE DIRECTION) SEGMENT - TRONÇON TRACK OWNED BY - PROP. DE LA VOIE Normal - Normale Peak - Pointe 101 Halifax-Truro CN 6 6 104 Truro-Amherst CN 6 6 105 Amherst-Moncton CN 6 6 107 Moncton-Campbellton CN 6 6 108 Campbellton-Matapédia CN 6 6 109 Gaspé-Matapédia CN 3 3 110 Matapédia-Mont-Joli CN 6 6 111 Mont-Joli-Charny CN 6 6 112 Sainte-Foy-Charny CN 25 25 113 Charny-Saint-Hyacinthe CN 31 31 118 Saint-Hyacinthe-Montréal CN 31 31
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 2
2 Section 2 1 of Order No. R-39638 of August 6, 1986, as amended by Order No. 1988-R-398 of April 29, 1988 and Order in Council P.C. 1989-1974 of October 4, 1989, is replaced by the following: 2 (1) VIA Rail Canada Inc., CN and CP shall not discontinue the operation of the following passenger-train services: (a) Moncton-Montreal; (b) Gaspé-Montreal; (c) Jonquière-Montreal; (d) Montreal-Cochrane; (e) the Toronto-Sudbury portion of the Montreal/Toronto-Vancouver service; (f) Capreol-Winnipeg; (g) Sudbury-White River; and (h) Winnipeg-Churchill. (2) VIA Rail Canada Inc., CN and CP shall discontinue the operation of the following passenger-train services effective January 15, 1990: (a) Halifax-Yarmouth; (b) Halifax-Saint John; and (c) the Montreal-Ottawa, Ottawa-North Bay, North Bay-Sudbury, Sudbury-White River, White River-Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay-Winnipeg, Winnipeg-Regina, Regina-Calgary, Calgary-Kamloops, and Kamloops-Vancouver segments of the Montreal/Toronto-Vancouver service. (3) VIA Rail Canada Inc. and CN shall extend the Moncton-Montreal passenger-train service to Moncton-Halifax effective January 15, 1990. (4) VIA Rail Canada Inc. and CP shall discontinue the operation of the Halifax-Montreal passenger-train service via Saint John effective December 17, 1994. (5) VIA Rail Canada Inc. shall operate the Gaspé-Montreal and the remaining Halifax-Montreal passenger-train services as a joint passenger-train service between Montreal and Matapédia.
Order Varying Certain National Transportation Agency Orders Respecting Railway Companies — 2
2 (1) VIA Rail Canada Inc., CN and CP shall not discontinue the operation of the following passenger-train services: (a) Moncton-Montreal; (b) Gaspé-Montreal; (c) Jonquière-Montreal; (d) Montreal-Cochrane; (e) the Toronto-Sudbury portion of the Montreal/Toronto-Vancouver service; (f) Capreol-Winnipeg; (g) Sudbury-White River; and (h) Winnipeg-Churchill. (2) VIA Rail Canada Inc., CN and CP shall discontinue the operation of the following passenger-train services effective January 15, 1990: (a) Halifax-Yarmouth; (b) Halifax-Saint John; and (c) the Montreal-Ottawa, Ottawa-North Bay, North Bay-Sudbury, Sudbury-White River, White River-Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay-Winnipeg, Winnipeg-Regina, Regina-Calgary, Calgary-Kamloops, and Kamloops-Vancouver segments of the Montreal/Toronto-Vancouver service. (3) VIA Rail Canada Inc. and CN shall extend the Moncton-Montreal passenger-train service to Moncton-Halifax effective January 15, 1990. (4) VIA Rail Canada Inc. and CP shall discontinue the operation of the Halifax-Montreal passenger-train service via Saint John effective December 17, 1994. (5) VIA Rail Canada Inc. shall operate the Gaspé-Montreal and the remaining Halifax-Montreal passenger-train services as a joint passenger-train service between Montreal and Matapédia.
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations —  *
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, pursuant to subsection 50(2) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act * , is pleased hereby to revoke the Phosphorus Concentration Control Regulations , C.R.C., c. 393, and to make the annexed Regulations respecting the concentration of phosphorus in laundry detergents , in substitution therefor. * S.C. 1988, c. 22
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 1
1 Section 117 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 does not apply to a cleaning product that is in transit through Canada, from a place outside Canada to another place outside Canada. SOR/2019-90, s. 1
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 2
2 For the purpose of paragraph 118(1)(a) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 , phosphorus and its compounds thereof are nutrients. SOR/2000-106, s. 1
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 3
3 The concentration of phosphorus in any household laundry detergent must not exceed 1.1% by weight expressed as phosphorus pentoxide or 0.5% by weight expressed as elemental phosphorus. SOR/2009-178, s. 3
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 4
4 The concentration of phosphorus in any commercial or industrial laundry detergent must not exceed 5% by weight expressed as phosphorus pentoxide or 2.2% by weight expressed as elemental phosphorus. SOR/2009-178, s. 3
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 5
5 The concentration of phosphorus in any household dish-washing compound must not exceed 1.1% by weight expressed as phosphorus pentoxide or 0.5% by weight expressed as elemental phosphorus. SOR/2009-178, s. 3
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 6
6 The concentration of phosphorus in any household cleaner, other than a laundry detergent, dish-washing compound, metal cleaner or de-greasing compound, must not exceed 1.1% by weight expressed as phosphorus pentoxide or 0.5% by weight expressed as elemental phosphorus. SOR/2009-178, s. 3
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 7
7 Any analysis performed to determine the concentration of phosphorus for the purposes of these Regulations must be performed by a laboratory that meets the following conditions at the time of the analysis: (a) it is accredited (i) under the International Organization for Standardization standard ISO/IEC 17025, entitled General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories , by an accrediting body that is a signatory to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation Mutual Recognition Arrangement, or (ii) under the Environment Quality Act , CQLR, c. Q-2; and (b) the scope of its accreditation includes the analysis performed to determine the concentration of phosphorus. SOR/2009-178, s. 3 SOR/2019-90, s. 2
Concentration of Phosphorus in Certain Cleaning Products Regulations — 8
8 (1) Every person who, during any year, manufactures for use or sale in Canada or imports any laundry detergent, household dish-washing compound or household cleaner within the meaning of section 6 containing phosphorus must maintain records containing the following: (a) respecting the manufacture for use or sale (i) the brand name of each laundry detergent, household dish-washing compound or household cleaner containing phosphorus, (ii) the name and civic address of the principal place of business of the manufacturer, (iii) the quantity of each of the cleaning products shipped from each manufacturing plant; and (iv) the name and civic address of the recipient of each cleaning product that was shipped or sold; (b) respecting the import (i) the brand name of each laundry detergent, household dish-washing compound or household cleaner containing phosphorus, (ii) the name and civic address of the principal place of business of the importer, (iii) the port of entry where each cleaning product is imported, (iv) the name and civic address of the sender of each cleaning product, (v) the date of import, (vi) the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System number for the cleaning product that is imported, and (vii) the importer number for the shipment of the cleaning product that is imported. (2) The records must be kept for a period of five years after the day on which the records are made, at the person’s principal place of business in Canada or at any other place in Canada where they can be inspected. If the records are kept at any place other than the person’s principal place of business, the person must provide the Minister with the civic address of the place where they are kept. SOR/2009-178, s. 3
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — *
Whereas the Governor in Council has, by the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg Marketing Agency Proclamation * , established the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg Marketing Agency pursuant to subsection 16(1) of the Farm Products Marketing Agencies Act ; * SOR/87-40, 1987 Canada Gazette Part II, p. 317
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations
Whereas the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg Marketing Agency has been empowered to implement a marketing plan pursuant to the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg Marketing Agency Proclamation * ;
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations
Whereas, the proposed Regulations respecting the pricing of broiler hatching eggs marketed in Interprovincial Trade set out in the schedule hereto are of a class to which paragraph 7(1)(d) of the said Act applies by reason of section 2 of the Agencies’ Orders and Regulations Approval Order , C.R.C., c. 648, and have been submitted to the National Farm Products Marketing Council pursuant to paragraph 22(1)(f) of the said Act;
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations
And Whereas, pursuant to paragraph 7(1)(d) of the said Act, the National Farm Products Marketing Council is satisfied that the proposed Regulations are necessary for the implementation of the marketing plan that the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg Marketing Agency is authorized to implement and has approved the proposed Regulations on October 3, 1989.
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations
Therefore, the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg Marketing Agency, pursuant to paragraph 22(1)(f) of the Farm Products Marketing Agencies Act and section 9 of the schedule to the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg Marketing Agency Proclamation * , hereby makes the annexed Regulations respecting the pricing of broiler hatching eggs marketed in interprovincial trade , effective December 1, 1989.
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — 1
1 These Regulations may be cited as the Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations .
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — 2
2 (1) In these Regulations, broiler hatching egg [Repealed, SOR/2013-256, s. 1] Commodity Board [Repealed, SOR/2013-256, s. 1] hatchability means the percentage of saleable chicks obtained from the incubation of broiler hatching eggs as established for each province by the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food and published by that Department in the Hatchery Review . ( coefficient d’éclosion ) non-signatory provinces [Repealed, SOR/2013-256, s. 1] signatory provinces [Repealed, SOR/2013-256, s. 1] (2) [Repealed, SOR/2016-290, s. 1] SOR/2008-10, s. 1; SOR/2013-256, s. 1; SOR/2016-290, s. 1
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations
broiler hatching egg [Repealed, SOR/2013-256, s. 1]
Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations — Canadian Broiler Hatching Egg (Interprovincial) Pricing Regulations
Commodity Board [Repealed, SOR/2013-256, s. 1]