GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
The consequences from listing could be so severe that, considering the restrictions necessary to protect those populations, there would likely be no marine commercial fishery on Fraser River sockeye salmon in three of those four years. In all four years, the food, social and ceremonial fishing requirements of many first nations who harvest in marine waters would likely not be achieved. After two years in the four-year cycle, the food, social and ceremonial fishing requirements of first nations in the Fraser River area below the Vedder River would likely not be met. Processors heavily dependant on sockeye salmon would also be negatively impacted. Those impacts on the south coast BC sockeye salmon fishery and the coastal communities would extend with lasting effects to future four-year cycles of Fraser River sockeye salmon.
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
With regard to the assessment process, the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board (NWMB) feels that the status reports on which COSEWIC based their assessments of the species for special concern were based on criteria and processes in place before the Act came into force and that those reports do not satisfy the new requirements to incorporate the best available community knowledge and aboriginal traditional knowledge. The NWMB also stated that consultations have not been sufficient. Those species are not being added to the List at this time in order to consult further with the NWMB so as to determine how its concerns can be addressed. The Minister may reconsider the matter after those consultations have been completed.
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
The COSEWIC assessment of “endangered” may well be consistent with the fact that the speckled dace is a rare species with a very restricted distribution in Canada. However, there are several points in the COSEWIC status report that require better documentation, and the impact of a key threat mentioned in the COSEWIC status report has been reduced subsequent to the COSEWIC assessment. Accordingly, further information and consideration on the following points are required to clarify the biological basis for the assessment: The COSEWIC’s status report published on the public registry established under the Act indicates that a proposed dam project would “result in the loss of as much as 22% of the existing Canadian habitat” (page 28). However, the status report elsewhere indicates that the dam would flood either 2.5 km or 2.7 km of speckled dace habitat and that speckled dace are found at sites along 112 km of watersheds in southern British Columbia, which would indicate that the dam would impact around 2% of existing habitat rather than 22%. Clarification of the potential impact of the dam is required since the COSEWIC assessment summary published on the public registry refers to the “construction of a proposed dam” as a key factor in the assessment. The COSEWIC’s status report was completed in 2002. Since the status report and the assessment were completed, design changes have been made to the dam project, which would considerably reduce its impact on the upstream habitat of speckled dace. Specifically, the area flooded will be reduced from 2.5 km to 350 m. Since the dam project is identified as a key factor in the assessment, further consideration of whether this change in impact would affect the assessment is required. Further consideration of whether the status report should be revised to better support the technical summary and the assessment summary is required. Specifically, the technical summary of the status report refers to an estimated decline of at least 10% per year for this species. Further information on the basis for this estimate would be essential to clearly document the conclusion and to ensure that the status report’s information supports a decision on whether to list and to take subsequent recovery actions. “Urban and industrial development” are referred to in the assessment summary as threats to the species but are not documented in the status report. Further information on this would help to clarify the basis for the assessment and to support any listing discussions. In light of the above, further consideration should be given to whether the overall assessment of “endangered” is justified.
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
The COSEWIC’s status report published on the public registry established under the Act indicates that a proposed dam project would “result in the loss of as much as 22% of the existing Canadian habitat” (page 28). However, the status report elsewhere indicates that the dam would flood either 2.5 km or 2.7 km of speckled dace habitat and that speckled dace are found at sites along 112 km of watersheds in southern British Columbia, which would indicate that the dam would impact around 2% of existing habitat rather than 22%. Clarification of the potential impact of the dam is required since the COSEWIC assessment summary published on the public registry refers to the “construction of a proposed dam” as a key factor in the assessment.
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
The COSEWIC’s status report was completed in 2002. Since the status report and the assessment were completed, design changes have been made to the dam project, which would considerably reduce its impact on the upstream habitat of speckled dace. Specifically, the area flooded will be reduced from 2.5 km to 350 m. Since the dam project is identified as a key factor in the assessment, further consideration of whether this change in impact would affect the assessment is required.
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
Further consideration of whether the status report should be revised to better support the technical summary and the assessment summary is required. Specifically, the technical summary of the status report refers to an estimated decline of at least 10% per year for this species. Further information on the basis for this estimate would be essential to clearly document the conclusion and to ensure that the status report’s information supports a decision on whether to list and to take subsequent recovery actions.
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
“Urban and industrial development” are referred to in the assessment summary as threats to the species but are not documented in the status report. Further information on this would help to clarify the basis for the assessment and to support any listing discussions.
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species
In light of the above, further consideration should be given to whether the overall assessment of “endangered” is justified.
Order Transferring from the Department of Natural Resources to the Department of the Environment the Control and Supervision of the Large Final Emitters Group — Order Transferring from the Department of Natural Resources to the Department of the Environment the Control and Supervision of the Large Final Emitters Group
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Public Service Rearrangement and Transfer of Duties Act , hereby transfers from the Department of Natural Resources to the Department of the Environment the control and supervision of the portion of the federal public administration in the Department of Natural Resources known as the Large Final Emitters Group.
Order Directing that Certain Documents be Discontinued — a
Therefore, Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the President of the Treasury Board, pursuant to section 157 a of the Financial Administration Act , hereby directs that the documents set out in the annexed schedule be discontinued and hereafter they need not be prepared or laid before either House of Parliament. a S.C. 1991, c. 24, s. 47
Order Directing that Certain Documents be Discontinued — 1
1 Annual report on the operations of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency ( Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act , S.C. 1997, c. 6, s. 23)
Order Directing that Certain Documents be Discontinued — 2
2 Annual report on the operations of the Parks Canada Agency ( Parks Canada Agency Act , S.C. 1998, c. 31, s. 34)
Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine) — Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine)
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, pursuant to paragraph 23(a) of the Territorial Lands Act , hereby makes the annexed Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine) .
Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine) — 1
1 The purpose of this Order is to withdraw from disposal the subsurface rights of certain tracts of land at the abandoned Giant Mine site located in Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories to allow remediation of the site and to avoid potential conflicts with other users.
Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine) — 2
2 Subject to sections 3 and 4, the subsurface rights of the tracts of territorial lands set out in the schedule are withdrawn from disposal for the period beginning on the day on which this Order is made.
Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine) — 3
3 Section 2 does not apply to the disposition of substances or materials under the Territorial Quarrying Regulations .
Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine) — 4
4 For greater certainty, section 2 does not apply to (a) the locating of a mineral claim by the holder of a prospecting permit granted before the day on which this Order is made; (b) the recording of a mineral claim that is referred to in paragraph (a) or that was located before the day on which this Order is made; (c) the granting of a lease under the Canada Mining Regulations to a person with a recorded claim if the lease covers an area within the recorded claim; (d) the issuance of a significant discovery licence under the Canada Petroleum Resources Act to a holder of an exploration licence that was issued before the day on which this Order is made if the significant discovery licence covers an area subject to the exploration licence; (e) the issuance of a production licence under the Canada Petroleum Resources Act to a holder of a significant discovery licence that is referred to in paragraph (d) if the production licence covers an area subject to the significant discovery licence; (f) the issuance of a production licence under the Canada Petroleum Resources Act to a holder of an exploration licence or a significant discovery licence that was issued before the day on which this Order is made if the production licence covers an area subject to the exploration licence or the significant discovery licence; (g) the granting of a surface lease under the Territorial Lands Act to a holder of a recorded claim under the Canada Mining Regulations or of an interest under the Canada Petroleum Resources Act if the surface lease is required to allow the holder to exercise rights under the claim or interest; or (h) the renewal of an interest.
Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine) — Order Respecting the Withdrawal from Disposal of Certain Lands in the Northwest Territories (Giant Mine)
All that parcel of land in Yellowknife area, in mineral claim sheet, quad number 85J/9, in the Northwest Territories, as said parcel is shown outlined in red on a sketch plan on file 33-1-5-14 in the Land Management Division of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, at Ottawa, said parcel containing approximately 1,622.73 hectares.
Electrolux Remission Order — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, considering that the collection of certain amounts of duty is unjust, on the recommendation of the Minister of Finance, pursuant to subsection 23(2) a of the Financial Administration Act , hereby makes the annexed Electrolux Remission Order . a S.C. 1991, c. 24, s. 7(2)
Electrolux Remission Order — 1
1 The following definitions apply in this Order. eligible dryers means gas or electric laundry dryers, excluding those with controls at the front, removable tops and chassis designed to be stacked on top of washers, imported by Electrolux. ( sécheuses admissibles ) eligible refrigerators means top-mounted electric refrigerators, in sizes greater than 14.5 cubic feet (410.59 litres) and less than 18.5 cubic feet (524 litres), imported by Electrolux. ( réfrigérateurs admissibles ) imported by Electrolux means imported by Electrolux Canada Corp. (formerly known as WCI Canada Inc.), originating in or exported from the United States and bearing a trademark owned by Electrolux Home Products, Inc. (formerly known as White Consolidated Industries, Inc.), its affiliates, successors, or assigns. ( importé par Electrolux )
Electrolux Remission Order — Electrolux Remission Order
eligible dryers means gas or electric laundry dryers, excluding those with controls at the front, removable tops and chassis designed to be stacked on top of washers, imported by Electrolux. ( sécheuses admissibles )
Electrolux Remission Order — Electrolux Remission Order
eligible refrigerators means top-mounted electric refrigerators, in sizes greater than 14.5 cubic feet (410.59 litres) and less than 18.5 cubic feet (524 litres), imported by Electrolux. ( réfrigérateurs admissibles )
Electrolux Remission Order — Electrolux Remission Order
imported by Electrolux means imported by Electrolux Canada Corp. (formerly known as WCI Canada Inc.), originating in or exported from the United States and bearing a trademark owned by Electrolux Home Products, Inc. (formerly known as White Consolidated Industries, Inc.), its affiliates, successors, or assigns. ( importé par Electrolux )
Electrolux Remission Order — 2
2 Remission is hereby granted of anti-dumping duties paid under the Special Import Measures Act by Electrolux Canada Corp. on importations of eligible refrigerators and eligible dryers during the period beginning on April 3, 2000, and ending on October 31, 2001.
Electrolux Remission Order — 3
3 The amount of the remission is the portion of the anti-dumping duties paid that exceeds the margin of dumping of the imported goods calculated on the basis of the methodology employed in the re-determinations made by the Commissioner of Customs and Revenue on December 5, 2003 pursuant to paragraph 59(1)(e) of the Special Import Measures Act with respect to certain eligible refrigerators and certain eligible dryers imported after October 31, 2001.
Electrolux Remission Order — 4
4 Remission is granted on the conditions that the claim for remission (a) is made to the Canada Border Services Agency within two years after the date on which this Order is made; and (b) is accompanied by the documentation required to determine the eligiblity for remission and the specific amount of anti-dumping duties to be remitted.
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories QUEEN, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
To all to whom these presents shall come or whom the same may in any way concern,
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
Whereas the bombing of Air India flight 182 on June 23, 1985 caused the deaths of 329 people;
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
Whereas the Air India bombing was the largest mass murder and terrorist act in Canadian history;
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
Whereas terrorist attacks are heinous acts against humanity and have claimed thousands of victims worldwide including Canadians who have lost their lives, or experienced the loss of loved ones, through these acts of human violence;
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
Whereas it is important that Canadians have an opportunity to honour the memory of the victims of terrorism and to denounce terrorism;
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
And whereas, by Order in Council P.C. 2005-1218 of June 22, 2005, the Governor in Council directed that a proclamation do issue requesting the people of Canada to observe June 23 of every year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism;
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
Now know you that We, by and with the advice of Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our proclamation request the people of Canada to observe June 23 of every year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism.
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
Of all which Our loving subjects and all others whom these presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly.
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
In testimony whereof, We have caused this Our proclamation to be published and the Great Seal of Canada to be hereunto affixed. Witness: Our Right Trusty and Well-beloved Adrienne Clarkson, Chancellor and Principal Companion of Our Order of Canada, Chancellor and Commander of Our Order of Military Merit, Chancellor and Commander of Our Order of Merit of the Police Forces, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada.
Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism — Proclamation Requesting the People of Canada to Observe June 23 of Every Year as a National Day of Remembrance for Victims of Terrorism
At our government house, in Our City of Ottawa, this twenty-fourth day of June in the year of Our Lord two thousand and five and in the fifty-fourth year of Our Reign.
Order Acknowledging Receipt of the Assessments Done Pursuant to Subsection 23(1) of the Act   — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, hereby acknowledges receipt of the assessments done pursuant to subsection 23(1) of the Species at Risk Act a by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) with respect to the species enumerated in the Annex to this Order. a S.C. 2002, c. 29
Order Giving Notice of Decisions not to add Certain Species to the List of Endangered Species — (a)
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, pursuant to paragraphs 27(1.1)(b) and (c) and subsection 27(1.2) of the Species at Risk Act a (the Act), hereby (a) decides not to add the Porsild’s bryum ( Mielichhoferia macrocarpa ), the plains bison ( Bison bison bison ), the Peary caribou ( Rangifer tarandus pearyi ) and the Dolphin and Union population of the barren-ground caribou ( Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus ) to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk (the List) set out in Schedule 1 to the Act; (b) acknowledges receipt of the assessment of the status of the polar bear ( Ursus maritimus ) done pursuant to subsection 23(1) of the Act by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC); (c) refers the assessment for the polar bear ( Ursus maritimus ) referred to in paragraph (b) and the dwarf woolly-heads ( Psilocarphus brevissimus ) referred to in Order in Council P.C. 2004-1175 of October 19, 2004 b back to COSEWIC for further information and consideration; and (d) approves that the Minister of the Environment include a statement in the public registry established under section 120 of the Act (i) in the form attached as Annex 1 to this Order setting out the reasons for deciding not to add the plains bison ( Bison bison bison ) to the List, (ii) in the form attached as Annex 2 to this Order setting out the reasons for deciding not to add the Porsild’s bryum ( Mielichhoferia macrocarpa ), the Peary caribou ( Rangifer tarandus pearyi ) and the Dolphin and Union population of the barren-ground caribou ( Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus ) to the List, and (iii) in the form attached as Annex 3 to this Order setting out the reasons for referring the assessment for the polar bear ( Ursus maritimus ) and the dwarf woolly-heads ( Psilocarphus brevissimus ) back to COSEWIC for further information and consideration. a S.C. 2002, c. 29 b SI/2004-138