Multi-Sector Air Pollutants Regulations — 1
1 The Alberta CEMS Code is to be read as follows: (a) with any table that sets out specifications read as establishing an obligation on the responsible person to respect those specifications; (b) without reference to Section 1.0; (c) without reference to “Unless otherwise authorized by the Director,” in Section 2.0; (d) without reference to Section 2.2; (e) without reference in Section 2.5.1 to (i) “as specified in the facility approval”, (ii) “in a format acceptable to the Director”, and (iii) “, if required by an approval”; (f) without reference to “or those hours during which effluent is being discharged from an effluent source as described in an approval (for noncombustion-related sources)” in Section 2.5.3; (g) without reference in Section 2.5.4 to (i) “Upon the authorization of the Director,”, (ii) “Reference Method test data or data obtained from a monitor previously certified for the application may also be used for substituting data.”, (iii) “, and must be authorized in writing by the Director prior to implementation”, and (iv) “, unless specified otherwise by the Director”; (h) with “Method 1 of the Alberta Stack Sampling Code as amended from time to time” in Section 3.1 read as “EPA Method 1 or EC Method A”; (i) with “Method 1 of the Alberta Stack Sampling Code” in Section 3.1.3 read as “EPA Method 1 or EC Method A” ; (j) with the portion of Section 3.2 before Section 3.2.1 read without reference to (i) “or at a location authorized by the Director”, and (ii) “or an alternative method as authorized by the Director, may be used”; (k) in Section 3.2.1, with (i) “Method 1 of the Alberta Stack Sampling Code” read as “EPA Method 1 or EC Method A”, and (ii) “Method 2 of the Alberta Stack Sampling Code” read as “EPA Method 2 or EC Method B”; (l) with “source owner or operator” in the portion of Section 4.1 before Section 4.1.1 read as “responsible person”; (m) in Section 4.1.1, (i) without reference to “Subject to Section 1.5.1,” (ii) with “owner or operator of the facility” read as “responsible person”, and (iii) without reference to “of a new CEMS, upon recertification, or as specified otherwise by the Director. The satisfactory demonstration by the approval holder of meeting all of these performance specifications, along with notice of such to the Director, shall constitute certification of the CEMS.”; (n) without reference in Section 4.2.1 to (i) “, subject to the provisions of an applicable approval,”, and (ii) “These specifications are not meant to limit the types of technologies that can be used or prevent the use of equivalent methods. Both technologies and methods can be varied upon authorization of the Director.”; (o) without reference in Section 4.2.2 to (i) “, subject to the provisions of an applicable approval,”, and (ii) “These specifications are not meant to limit the types of technologies that can be used or prevent the use of equivalent methods. Both technologies and methods can be varied upon the written authorization of the Director.”; (p) without reference in Section 4.2.3 to (i) “, subject to the provisions of an applicable approval,”, and (ii) “These specifications are not meant to limit the use of alternative technology and may be varied upon the written authorization of the Director to accommodate the use of alternative technology.”; (q) without reference to Section 4.2.4; (r) without reference in Section 4.2.5 to “These specifications are not meant to limit the types of technologies to be used or prevent the use of equivalent methods (such as the use of F-factors). Both technologies and methods can be varied upon written authorization of the Director.”; (s) in Section 4.2.6, (i) with “approval holder” read as “responsible person”, (ii) without reference to “, as specified in an EPEA approval”, and (iii) without reference to “These specifications are not meant to limit the types of technologies to be used or prevent the use of equivalent methods. Both technologies and methods can be varied upon the w