GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (2)
(2) If there is a failure to comply with a rule, a judge may grant any relief the judge considers necessary to achieve the purpose of these Rules.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (3)
(3) If necessary in the interests of justice and in consideration of the purpose of these Rules, a judge may, by order and on any terms the judge considers just, dispense with or vary one or more of these Rules in a particular case.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) The chief judge of the Court may issue practice directions consistent with these Rules and their purpose.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) If a rule requires notice to be given to the Court, prosecutor or accused’s legal counsel, the requirement is satisfied if the notice is provided by fax to that recipient.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (2)
(2) Subject to subrule (3), if a rule requires a record to be filed with the Court, the record shall be filed with the Court registry where the prosecution was commenced.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (3)
(3) If, as a result of an application to change the venue of a trial, the matter has been transferred for hearing to another Court registry, any record required by a rule to be filed with the Court shall be filed with that Court registry.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) Subject to subrule (5), the purpose of the initial appearance is to set a timely date for the accused’s arraignment hearing.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (2)
(2) If an accused is not represented by legal counsel at the initial appearance, the justice shall (a) determine whether or not the accused wishes to consult with or obtain legal counsel; and (b) if so, adjourn the initial appearance for a period that is reasonable for that purpose.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) determine whether or not the accused wishes to consult with or obtain legal counsel; and
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) if so, adjourn the initial appearance for a period that is reasonable for that purpose.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (3)
(3) A justice may refer an accused who is not represented by legal counsel to duty counsel or other legal counsel of the accused’s choice before setting a date for the arraignment hearing.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (5)
(5) If the accused indicates to the justice the intention to enter a guilty plea, the justice shall record the accused’s intention to plead guilty and set the matter to be heard by a judge (a) immediately; or (b) on another date, if the justice is satisfied upon application by the prosecutor or the accused that the interests of justice may be served and an unnecessary trial date be avoided by adjourning to such later date.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) on another date, if the justice is satisfied upon application by the prosecutor or the accused that the interests of justice may be served and an unnecessary trial date be avoided by adjourning to such later date.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (6)
(6) A justice may at any time refer a matter to a judge for directions and the judge may make any order or give any direction that the judge considers necessary to achieve the purpose of these Rules.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (7)
(7) If an accused is to be held in custody until trial or preliminary inquiry, as the case may be, or if a judge determines that an accused requires that a time for trial be expedited, a judge may (a) order that the matter proceed directly to an arraignment hearing on a date determined by the judge after consultation with the trial scheduler; and (b) make any order or give any direction that the judge considers necessary to achieve the purpose of these Rules.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) order that the matter proceed directly to an arraignment hearing on a date determined by the judge after consultation with the trial scheduler; and
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) make any order or give any direction that the judge considers necessary to achieve the purpose of these Rules.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) At the initial appearance or as soon as practicable after it, the prosecutor shall provide the accused or his or her legal counsel with disclosure required by law.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (2)
(2) If at any time an issue arises concerning disclosure under this rule, any party to the proceeding may apply to a judge for directions.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (3)
(3) Nothing in this rule limits the ability (a) of the prosecutor to provide further or better disclosure as it becomes available or as it is required by law, but such disclosure shall be made in a timely manner; or (b) of the accused or his or her legal counsel to apply to a judge for further or better disclosure, but such applications shall be made in a timely manner.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) of the prosecutor to provide further or better disclosure as it becomes available or as it is required by law, but such disclosure shall be made in a timely manner; or
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) of the accused or his or her legal counsel to apply to a judge for further or better disclosure, but such applications shall be made in a timely manner.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) Unless a justice orders otherwise, it is a requirement of the Court in both indictable and summary conviction proceedings that the following persons attend the arraignment hearing: (a) the accused; (b) the accused’s legal counsel, if any, or other legal counsel designated by the accused’s legal counsel for the purpose of that hearing; and (c) the prosecutor.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) the accused’s legal counsel, if any, or other legal counsel designated by the accused’s legal counsel for the purpose of that hearing; and
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (2)
(2) At an arraignment hearing, the judge may (a) call on the accused to make an election or enter a plea to the charges; (b) make inquiries to (i) assist in making an informed and accurate estimate about the length of a trial or preliminary inquiry into the matter, or (ii) facilitate the trial or preliminary inquiry, or simplify or dispose of issues; (c) give directions to the trial scheduler about the time to be set for the trial or preliminary inquiry; (d) if there is no trial scheduler for that Court registry, set the time for the trial or preliminary inquiry; (e) make any order or give any direction that the judge considers necessary to achieve the purpose of these Rules, to facilitate the trial or preliminary inquiry or to simplify or dispose of issues; (f) adjourn the arraignment hearing to enable compliance with any order made or direction given under paragraph (e); (g) adjourn the arraignment hearing and refer the accused, if not represented by legal counsel, to consult with duty counsel or other legal counsel of the accused’s choice; and (h) hear one or more applications made in respect of the case, if it is convenient and practicable to the Court and all parties.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) call on the accused to make an election or enter a plea to the charges;
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) make inquiries to (i) assist in making an informed and accurate estimate about the length of a trial or preliminary inquiry into the matter, or (ii) facilitate the trial or preliminary inquiry, or simplify or dispose of issues;
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (i)
(i) assist in making an informed and accurate estimate about the length of a trial or preliminary inquiry into the matter, or
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (ii)
(ii) facilitate the trial or preliminary inquiry, or simplify or dispose of issues;
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (c)
(c) give directions to the trial scheduler about the time to be set for the trial or preliminary inquiry;
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (d)
(d) if there is no trial scheduler for that Court registry, set the time for the trial or preliminary inquiry;
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (e)
(e) make any order or give any direction that the judge considers necessary to achieve the purpose of these Rules, to facilitate the trial or preliminary inquiry or to simplify or dispose of issues;
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (f)
(f) adjourn the arraignment hearing to enable compliance with any order made or direction given under paragraph (e);
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (g)
(g) adjourn the arraignment hearing and refer the accused, if not represented by legal counsel, to consult with duty counsel or other legal counsel of the accused’s choice; and
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (h)
(h) hear one or more applications made in respect of the case, if it is convenient and practicable to the Court and all parties.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (3)
(3) Nothing in this rule abrogates solicitor-client privilege and the right of the accused to remain silent.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (4)
(4) If the accused enters a guilty plea at the arraignment hearing, the presiding judge may (a) conduct a sentence hearing at that time; or (b) adjourn sentencing to a time that provides a just and timely disposition of the matter.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) conduct a sentence hearing at that time; or
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) adjourn sentencing to a time that provides a just and timely disposition of the matter.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (5)
(5) An accused who wishes to enter a guilty plea before the date set for the arraignment hearing may appear before a judge to do so on making the necessary arrangements with the trial scheduler in consultation with the prosecutor.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (6)
(6) If the judge presiding at the arraignment hearing refers the matter to a trial scheduler for scheduling, the trial scheduler shall (a) set a time for the trial or preliminary inquiry, as the case may be, or for the hearing of any applications in respect of the case, in accordance with (i) the time estimate determined by the judge, and (ii) any direction given by the judge. (b) [Repealed, SI/2013-120, s. 4]
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) set a time for the trial or preliminary inquiry, as the case may be, or for the hearing of any applications in respect of the case, in accordance with (i) the time estimate determined by the judge, and (ii) any direction given by the judge.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (i)
(i) the time estimate determined by the judge, and
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (7)
(7) The trial scheduler may, before setting a time under subrule (6), refer any scheduling difficulties that arise to the judge who presided at the arraignment hearing, providing the judge with information about those difficulties.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) This rule applies to an application for an order to adjourn a trial or preliminary inquiry, after a time for an order has been set for the proceeding but before it commences.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (2)
(2) An application for an order to adjourn a proceeding referred to in subrule (1) shall be made to a judge at the earliest opportunity after the applicant or the applicant’s legal counsel becomes aware that an adjournment is necessary.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (3)
(3) At least two days before the application for an order to adjourn is to be heard, notice of the application for an order to adjourn in Form 5 shall be filed with the Court and a copy of the notice given to each party, unless a judge dispenses with notice.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) Legal counsel shall promptly notify the Court of the following: (a) change of legal counsel for the accused; (b) withdrawal as legal counsel for the accused; and (c) if a time estimate provided to the Court, in relation to a proceeding, is inaccurate.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) change of legal counsel for the accused;
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) withdrawal as legal counsel for the accused; and
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (c)
(c) if a time estimate provided to the Court, in relation to a proceeding, is inaccurate.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (2)
(2) Legal counsel for the accused assuming conduct after the arraignment hearing shall promptly (a) file with the Court written notice of that fact and give a copy of the notice to each party; and (b) review the last time estimate provided to the Court in relation to the accused’s trial or preliminary inquiry, as the case may be.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (a)
(a) file with the Court written notice of that fact and give a copy of the notice to each party; and
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (b)
(b) review the last time estimate provided to the Court in relation to the accused’s trial or preliminary inquiry, as the case may be.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — (1)
(1) If necessary in the interests of justice and in consideration of the purpose of these Rules, the judge presiding at a proceeding that does not conclude within the time scheduled may order, on any terms the judge considers just, and having first consulted with the trial scheduler, that the proceeding continue within a 30-day period or less.
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules
CANADA - Provincial Court of British Columbia in the Provincial Court of British Columbia
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — 1
1 An application will be made by name of applicant to the court on month day year at time for an order to adjourn the ☐ trial ☐ preliminary inquiry currently set for month / day / year
Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules — 2
2 The facts on which this application is based are as follows:
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories QUEEN, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
To All to Whom these Presents shall come or whom the same may in anyway concern,
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Whereas, by Order in Council P.C. 1998-427 of March 19, 1998, the Governor in Council declared that, in accordance with Article XXIV of the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada, signed on January 8, 1998, the Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the fourth month following the month in which each Party shall have received written notification from the other Party that it has complied with all statutory requirements for the entry into force of the Agreement;
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Whereas the Order was laid before Parliament on April 2, 1998;
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Whereas, before the twentieth sitting day after the Order was laid before Parliament, no motion for the consideration of either House to the effect that the Order be revoked was filed with the Speaker of the appropriate House;
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Whereas, pursuant to subsection 42(2) of the Old Age Security Act , the Order came into force on the thirtieth sitting day after it was laid before Parliament, being June 5, 1998;
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Whereas instruments of ratification were exchanged on October 29, 1998;
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Whereas the Agreement will enter into force on the first day of the fourth month following the month in which the instruments of ratification were exchanged, being February 1, 1999;
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
And whereas, by Order in Council P.C. 1999-58 of January 21, 1999, the Governor in Council directed that a Proclamation do issue giving notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in force as of February 1, 1999;
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Now Know You that We, by and with the advice of Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation give notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada, signed on January 8, 1998, a copy of which is annexed hereto, is in force as of February 1, 1999.
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
Of All Which Our Loving Subjects and all others whom these Presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly.
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
In Testimony Whereof, We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent and the Great Seal of Canada to be hereunto affixed. Witness: Our Right Trusty and Well-beloved Roméo A. LeBlanc, a Member of Our Privy Council for Canada, Chancellor and Principal Companion of Our Order of Canada, Chancellor and Commander of Our Order of Military Merit, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada.
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
At Our Government House, in Our City of Ottawa, this tenth day of February in the year of Our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine and in the forty-eighth year of Our Reign.
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”,
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
RESOLVED to co-operate in the field of social security,
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999
HAVE DECIDED to conclude an agreement for this purpose, and
Proclamation Giving Notice that the Agreement on Social Security between Canada and Grenada is in Force as of February 1, 1999 — 1
1 For the purposes of this Agreement: benefit means, as regards a Party, any cash benefit, pension or allowance for which provision is made in the legislation of that Party and includes any supplements or increases applicable to such a cash benefit, pension or allowance; however, for the purposes of Articles VIII, IX and X, “benefit” does not include a grant payable under the legislation of Grenada; competent authority means, as regards Canada, the Minister or Ministers responsible for the application of the legislation of Canada; and, as regards Grenada, the Minister responsible for Social Security; competent institution means, as regards Canada, the competent authority; and, as regards Grenada, the National Insurance Board; creditable period means, as regards a Party, a period of contributions, whether paid or credited, or a period of residence used to acquire the right to a benefit under the legislation of that Party; as regards Canada, it also means a period during which a disability pension is payable under the Canada Pension Plan ; legislation means, as regards a Party, the laws and regulations specified in Article II(1) with respect to that Party.