GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 18
18 A general description of (a) the content and format of the proposed sales orders and the commands to be given in the operation of the remote sensing space system; and (b) the process used to determine the commands given to the remote sensing satellite that sets out the priority of conflicting sales orders requiring the same resources of the satellite.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 19
19 A diagram that (a) shows each step to be taken by the applicant or proposed system participant from the placement of a sales order for raw data or a remote sensing product to the communication of the raw data to a recipient or the provision of the remote sensing product to a recipient; and (b) indicates the command protection measures proposed for each step.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 20
20 A description of the command protection measures proposed for each step of the business process, including (a) the measures proposed for each facility to be used to process sales orders or to give commands to the remote sensing satellite, including measures relating to (i) the security screening of personnel, (ii) the physical security of the facility, and (iii) the information assurance, within the facility, of sales orders and satellite commands; (b) the measures proposed for the communication of sales orders and satellite commands between the facilities of the remote sensing space system, including measures relating to physical and electronic protection and information assurance; and (c) the measures proposed for the communication of commands to remote sensing satellites, including measures relating to electronic protection and information assurance.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 21
21 Proposed measures to comply with (a) the conditions in paragraphs 8(4)(a) to (f) of the Act; (b) an order that may be made under section 14 or 15 of the Act; and (c) section 16 of the Act.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 22
22 The general strategy with respect to data protection.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 23
23 The location and function of all facilities, including mobile facilities, to be used to handle raw data and remote sensing products in the operation of the remote sensing space system.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 24
24 A general description and block diagram of all facilities to be used to handle raw data and remote sensing products, including the longitude and latitude and station mask of each ground station.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 25
25 (1) A general description and block diagram of the proposed communication architecture that includes descriptions of (a) each system supporting the facilities that are to be used to handle raw data and remote sensing products; (b) links between the facilities and the remote sensing satellite; (c) links for the relaying of raw data and remote sensing products between facilities on the ground; and (d) crosslinks between remote sensing satellites. (2) The radio-frequency downlink information, including the characterization of each link and the type of information carried by each communication channel. (3) The protocols to be used in the communication architecture. (4) A description of the encryption to be used on all communication channels including keying and rekeying schemes. (5) Management plans for the keys to be used in satellite downlinks and relays and in facilities used to handle raw data and remote sensing products.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 26
26 A general description of (a) the content and format of raw data and remote sensing products; and (b) the processes to be employed to alter image quality and information content at each step from the acquisition of raw data to the provision of a remote sensing product, including such processes as spatial or spectral pixel aggregation — discarding low order analog-to-digital bits — and data compression.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 27
27 A diagram that (a) shows each step to be taken by the applicant or proposed system participant from the placement of a sales order for raw data or a remote sensing product to the communication of raw data to a recipient or the provision of the remote sensing product to a recipient; and (b) indicates the data protection measures proposed for each step.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 28
28 A description of the data protection measures proposed for each step of the business process, including (a) the measures proposed for each facility to be used to handle raw data and remote sensing products, including measures relating to (i) the security screening of personnel, (ii) the physical security of the facility, and (iii) the information assurance, within the facility, in respect of raw data and remote sensing products; (b) the measures proposed for the transfer of raw data and remote sensing products between the facilities of the remote sensing space system, including measures relating to physical and electronic protection and information assurance; and (c) the measures proposed for the communication of raw data and the provision of remote sensing products to recipients, including measures relating to physical and electronic protection and information assurance.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 29
29 Proposed measures to comply with any conditions of the licence that restrict the communication of raw data or the provision of remote sensing products related to (a) recipients or classes of recipients of raw data or remote sensing products; (b) sensor modes; (c) types of raw data or remote sensing products; (d) the time between the acquisition of raw data by the remote sensing satellite and the communication of the raw data or the provision of a remote sensing product to a recipient; (e) the sensed territory; (f) the location of the recipients; and (g) any agreements entered into under paragraph 8(6)(b) or (7)(b) of the Act.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 30
30 In lieu of a separate command protection plan and data protection plan, a combined command and data protection plan that contains the information and documents set out in sections 14 to 29 of this Schedule.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 31
31 The name, identifying information and contact information of each entity affiliated with the applicant that will be involved in the operation of the licensed system, a description of their involvement and the name, identifying information and contact information of each person who exercises control over the affiliated entity.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Regulations — 32
32 If the application includes a request to designate a person to be a system participant, (a) the proposed system participant’s name, identifying information and contact information; (b) the address of each facility to be used by the proposed system participant for carrying on controlled activities, including the location and station mask of each ground station and telemetry, tracking and command station; and (c) a copy of an agreement or proposed agreement between the applicant and the proposed system participant that specifies (i) the territory from which the proposed system participant will communicate raw data and provide remote sensing products or will give commands to the remote sensing satellite, (ii) the proposed system participant’s data protection plan that contains the information and documents referred to in sections 22 to 29 of this Schedule as modified to relate to the proposed system participant’s operations, and, if the applicant intends to permit the proposed system participant to formulate or give a command to a remote sensing satellite of the system, its command protection plan that contains the information and documents referred to in sections 14 to 21 of this Schedule as modified to relate to the proposed system participant’s operations, (iii) how the proposed system participant will make raw data and remote sensing products available to the governments of countries whose territories have been sensed by the system, (iv) how the proposed system participant will make raw data available to the applicant before the data is disposed of, (v) how the proposed system participant will assist the applicant to provide service pursuant to an order under section 15 of the Act, (vi) the proposed system participant’s obligation to maintain records, the address where the records will be maintained and the proposed system participant’s obligation to allow the applicant access to them, (vii) the proposed system participant’s obligation to make periodic or other reports to the applicant, (viii) the proposed system participant’s obligation to allow the applicant or an inspector access to their facilities in order to monitor compliance with the proposed system participant’s data protection plan and the proposed system participant’s command protection plan, if any, and (ix) the obligation of the proposed system participant to allow the applicant or an inspector access to their facilities in order to monitor compliance on the part of the applicant with the applicant’s command protection plan and data protection plan and the applicant’s requirements under the Act, these Regulations and the conditions of the licence.
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Minister of Finance, pursuant to section 5 a of the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act b , hereby makes the annexed Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order . a S.C. 2002, c. 12, ss. 3 and 10 b S.C. 1991, c. 41
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — 1
1 The following definitions apply in this Order. United Nations Convention means the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations set out in Schedule III to the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act . ( Convention des Nations Unies ) Organization means the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. ( Organisation ) Vienna Convention means the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations set out in Schedule I to the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act . ( Convention de Vienne )
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order
United Nations Convention means the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations set out in Schedule III to the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act . ( Convention des Nations Unies )
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order
Organization means the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. ( Organisation )
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order
Vienna Convention means the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations set out in Schedule I to the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act . ( Convention de Vienne )
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — 2
2 (1) The Organization shall have in Canada the legal capacities of a body corporate and the privileges and immunities set out in Articles II and III of the United Nations Convention. (2) Officials of the Organization shall have in Canada, to the extent that may be required for the exercise of their functions in relation to the Organization, the privileges and immunities set out in section 18 of Article V of the United Nations Convention. (3) In addition to the privileges and immunities accorded to officials under subsection (2), the Executive Secretary of the Secretariat of the Organization, together with the members of his or her family forming part of his or her household, shall have in Canada privileges and immunities comparable to the privileges and immunities accorded to diplomatic agents and the members of their families forming part of their households under the Vienna Convention.
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — 3
3 The privileges and immunities referred to in subsections 2(2) and (3) do not apply to Canadian citizens or permanent residents of Canada in respect of their liability for taxes or duties imposed by any law in Canada.
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — 4
4 This Order does not restrict the capacity of the Government of Canada to refuse officials of the Organization entry to Canada or to exclude them from Canada, for reasons linked to national security.
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Privileges and Immunities Order — 5
5 This Order comes into force on the day on which it is registered.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas, on April 6, 2006, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (the Commission) rendered Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15, Forbearance from the regulation of retail local exchange services (the Decision);
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Commission determined that it was prepared to forbear from regulating retail local exchange services provided by Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) when the ILEC could demonstrate that, in the relevant market, rivalrous behaviour exists and that it has experienced a 25% market share loss, complied with specified competitor quality of service standards throughout the six-month period preceding its application for forbearance, implemented approved Competitor Services tariffs and provided competitors with access to its Operational Support Systems;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Commission determined that local forbearance regions (LFRs) were the appropriate geographic component of a relevant market;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Commission considered providing ILECs with greater regulatory flexibility prior to forbearance and the circumstances under which it might lessen or remove existing competitive safeguards for promotions, as defined in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-25, Promotions of local wireline services , lessen or remove the local winback rule set out in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , as amended by Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28-1 and confirmed by Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53, permit the ex parte filing of tariff applications for promotions, and permit the waiving of service charges for local residential winbacks;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas subsection 12(1) of the Telecommunications Act (the Act) provides that, within one year after a decision by the Commission, the Governor in Council may vary the decision on petition in writing presented to the Governor in Council within 90 days after the decision;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas petitions by the Government of Saskatchewan and the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications and a joint petition by Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Telus Communications Company were presented in writing to the Governor in Council within 90 days after the Decision;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas, in accordance with subsection 12(4) of the Act, notices of receipt of those petitions were published in the Canada Gazette by the Minister of Industry on June 3, 2006 and July 22, 2006, indicating that the petitions and any petition or submission made in response to them could be inspected and copied at the website strategis.gc.ca;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas, in accordance with section 13 of the Act, the Minister of Industry has notified a minister designated by the government of each province of the Minister’s intention to make a recommendation to the Governor in Council for the purposes of an order under section 12 of the Act and has provided an opportunity for each of them to consult with the Minister;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas a copy of the proposed Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006–15 was published in the Canada Gazette , Part I, on December 16, 2006 and a reasonable opportunity was thereby afforded to interested persons to make representations with respect to the proposed Order;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas subsection 34(1) of the Act provides that the Commission may make a determination to refrain, in whole or in part and conditionally or unconditionally, from the exercise of any power or the performance of any duty under sections 24, 25, 27, 29 and 31 of the Act in relation to a telecommunications service or class of services provided by a Canadian carrier, if the Commission finds as a question of fact that to refrain would be consistent with the Canadian telecommunications policy objectives set out in section 7 of the Act;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Canadian telecommunications policy objectives include rendering reliable and affordable telecommunications services of high quality accessible to Canadians in both urban and rural areas in all regions of Canada, enhancing the efficiency and competitiveness, at the national and international levels, of Canadian telecommunications, fostering increased reliance on market forces for the provision of telecommunications services and ensuring that regulation, when required, is efficient and effective;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas subsection 34(2) of the Act provides that the Commission shall make a determination to refrain, to the extent that it considers appropriate, conditionally or unconditionally, from the exercise of any power or the performance of any duty under sections 24, 25, 27, 29 and 31 of the Act in relation to a telecommunications service or class of services provided by a Canadian carrier, where the Commission finds as a question of fact that the service or class of service is or will be subject to competition sufficient to protect the interests of users;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the evolution of competitive telecommunications markets in Canada has accelerated with the deployment of Internet Protocol technology;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas, in light of the evolving competition, the Governor in Council made, on December 14, 2006, the Order Issuing a Direction to the CRTC on Implementing the Canadian Telecommunication Policy Objectives ;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas that Order directs that the Commission should rely on market forces to the maximum extent feasible as the means of achieving the Canadian telecommunications policy objectives and that, when relying on regulation to achieve those objectives, the Commission should use measures that are efficient and proportionate to their purpose and that interfere with the operation of competitive market forces to the minimum extent necessary;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that facilities-based competition is a durable form of competition that delivers the greatest benefits to consumers, imposes competitive market discipline on incumbents and strengthens investment in telecommunications infrastructure;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that local business markets and local residential markets should be considered separately;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that it is important to adopt simple and streamlined criteria for de-regulating the services of incumbent telephone companies in order to avoid imposing an unnecessary regulatory burden that could deny or delay the benefits of competitive rivalry to consumers;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that LFRs are not the appropriate geographic component of a relevant market, as they are too vast to retain administrative practicality and do not reflect a social and economic community of interest;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that local exchanges are the appropriate geographic component of a relevant market, as they often reflect a social and economic community of interest and are less likely than LFRs to contain pockets of uncontested customers;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that the provision of competitor services by an ILEC, in accordance with the competitor quality of service standards, supports sustainable competition, and that it is appropriate that an ILEC demonstrate that it has, on average, met those standards prior to any granting of forbearance under section 34 of the Act;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that the use of mobile wireless technology by consumers is increasing and will likely continue to increase, and that for many consumers the exclusive use of mobile wireless services is an increasingly attractive alternative to wireline local exchange services;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that the removal of marketing restrictions imposed by the Commission on ILECs will foster an increased reliance on market forces and enhance competitive market rivalry;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that it would be consistent with Canadian telecommunications policy objectives for the Commission, in accordance with section 34 of the Act, to grant forbearance from regulating the provision of retail local exchange services when the criteria set out in this Order are satisfied;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15
And whereas the Governor in Council considers that retail local exchange services, for which forbearance is granted under section 34 of the Act based on the criteria set out in this Order, will be subject to competition that is sufficient to protect the interests of users and will not unduly impair the establishment or continuance of a competitive market;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — a
Therefore, Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Industry, pursuant to subsection 12(1) of the Telecommunications Act a , varies Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 as follows: a S.C. 1993, c. 38
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 1.
1. Paragraphs 141 to 168 of the Decision are replaced by the following: 141. The Commission considers that, for the purposes of a local forbearance application by an ILEC, a local exchange is the appropriate geographic component of the relevant market.