GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) Does either party seek other publication bans or deferred publication orders? Crown: Yes □ No □ Defence: Yes □ No □ If yes: (i) Provide details of order sought, media to be notified, timing of hearing and time estimate for hearing: (ii) Does the other party oppose the application? Yes □ No □ If opposed, provide time estimate for evidence and separate time estimate for argument: Evidence: Argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (i)
If yes: (i) Provide details of order sought, media to be notified, timing of hearing and time estimate for hearing: (ii) Does the other party oppose the application? Yes □ No □ If opposed, provide time estimate for evidence and separate time estimate for argument: Evidence: Argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (i)
(i) Provide details of order sought, media to be notified, timing of hearing and time estimate for hearing:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (ii)
(ii) Does the other party oppose the application? Yes □ No □ If opposed, provide time estimate for evidence and separate time estimate for argument: Evidence: Argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
If opposed, provide time estimate for evidence and separate time estimate for argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 20
20 Privilege Issues Will the Crown be raising issues of privilege? Yes □ No □ Will the defence be raising issues of privilege? Yes □ No □ If yes: (a) Specify the nature of the evidence and issue of privilege: (b) Specify the basis on which the party seeking admission is relying: (c) How does the party claiming privilege seek to introduce the evidence on the voir dire ? Viva voce evidence: Yes □ No □ Agreed statement of fact: Yes □ No □ Witness statements: Yes □ No □ Transcripts: Yes □ No □ (d) Does the other party consent to the manner in which the evidence will be introduced on the voir dire ? Yes □ No □ Comments: (e) Time estimate for voir dire : Evidence: Crown Defence Argument: Crown Defence
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
Will the Crown be raising issues of privilege? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
Will the defence be raising issues of privilege? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
If yes: (a) Specify the nature of the evidence and issue of privilege: (b) Specify the basis on which the party seeking admission is relying: (c) How does the party claiming privilege seek to introduce the evidence on the voir dire ? Viva voce evidence: Yes □ No □ Agreed statement of fact: Yes □ No □ Witness statements: Yes □ No □ Transcripts: Yes □ No □ (d) Does the other party consent to the manner in which the evidence will be introduced on the voir dire ? Yes □ No □ Comments: (e) Time estimate for voir dire : Evidence: Crown Defence Argument: Crown Defence
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
(a) Specify the nature of the evidence and issue of privilege:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) Specify the basis on which the party seeking admission is relying:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (c)
(c) How does the party claiming privilege seek to introduce the evidence on the voir dire ? Viva voce evidence: Yes □ No □ Agreed statement of fact: Yes □ No □ Witness statements: Yes □ No □ Transcripts: Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (d)
(d) Does the other party consent to the manner in which the evidence will be introduced on the voir dire ? Yes □ No □ Comments:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (e)
(e) Time estimate for voir dire : Evidence: Crown Defence Argument: Crown Defence
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 21
21 Gladue Considerations (a) Is the offender of Aboriginal heritage? Yes □ No □ (b) Does the Crown or defence anticipate calling any witnesses, introducing any evidence or making any submission in relation to Gladue considerations? Crown: Yes □ No □ Defence: Yes □ No □ If yes, indicate the witnesses to be called and the nature of their evidence and provide time estimates for evidence and argument: (c) Does the other counsel consent to the admissibility of the evidence? Yes □ No □ If no, provide the basis of the objection:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
(a) Is the offender of Aboriginal heritage? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) Does the Crown or defence anticipate calling any witnesses, introducing any evidence or making any submission in relation to Gladue considerations? Crown: Yes □ No □ Defence: Yes □ No □ If yes, indicate the witnesses to be called and the nature of their evidence and provide time estimates for evidence and argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
If yes, indicate the witnesses to be called and the nature of their evidence and provide time estimates for evidence and argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (c)
(c) Does the other counsel consent to the admissibility of the evidence? Yes □ No □ If no, provide the basis of the objection:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
If no, provide the basis of the objection:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 22
22 Factual, Evidentiary or Legal Admissions Sought by Crown or Conceded by Defence Admission Does the defence agree? 1 Yes □ No □ 2 Yes □ No □ 3 Yes □ No □ 4 Yes □ No □ 5 Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 23
23 Position of Offender in Court Will there be an application to have the offender sit at counsel table? Yes □ No □ If yes: (a) Does the Crown consent? Yes □ No □ If opposed, what is the nature of the evidence relied on? (b) Time estimate for voir dire : Evidence: Crown Defence Argument: Crown Defence
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
Will there be an application to have the offender sit at counsel table? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
If yes: (a) Does the Crown consent? Yes □ No □ If opposed, what is the nature of the evidence relied on? (b) Time estimate for voir dire : Evidence: Crown Defence Argument: Crown Defence
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
(a) Does the Crown consent? Yes □ No □ If opposed, what is the nature of the evidence relied on?
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
If opposed, what is the nature of the evidence relied on?
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) Time estimate for voir dire : Evidence: Crown Defence Argument: Crown Defence
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 24
24 Interpreters (a) Does the defence require an interpreter? Yes □ No □ If yes, for which language(s)? (b) Do any Crown witnesses require an interpreter? Yes □ No □ If yes, for which language(s)? (c) Are two interpreters required? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
(a) Does the defence require an interpreter? Yes □ No □ If yes, for which language(s)?
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) Do any Crown witnesses require an interpreter? Yes □ No □ If yes, for which language(s)?
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (c)
(c) Are two interpreters required? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 25
25 Additional Courtroom Equipment Required (a) Elmo projector: Yes □ No □ (b) Television and VCR: Yes □ No □ (c) Television and CD player: Yes □ No □ (d) Television and DVD player: Yes □ No □ (e) Hearing devices: Yes □ No □ (f) Teleconference facilities: Yes □ No □ (g) Other:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (c)
(c) Television and CD player: Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (d)
(d) Television and DVD player: Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (f)
(f) Teleconference facilities: Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 26
26 Courtroom Security Issues (a) Does any party believe that increased courtroom security issues are raised in this case? Yes □ No □ If yes, provide details: (b) Does any party seek an order closing the courtroom to the public under section 486(1) of the Code? Yes □ No □ If yes, provide details:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
(a) Does any party believe that increased courtroom security issues are raised in this case? Yes □ No □ If yes, provide details:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) Does any party seek an order closing the courtroom to the public under section 486(1) of the Code? Yes □ No □ If yes, provide details:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 27
27 Crown’s Position (a) On a dangerous offender application, is the Crown seeking (i) an indeterminate sentence, under paragraph 753(4)(a) of the Code? Yes □ No □ (ii) a determinate sentence followed by a long-term supervision order under paragraph 753(4)(b) of the Code? Yes □ No □ (iii) a determinate sentence under paragraph 753(4)(c) of the Code? Yes □ No □ Length: (b) On a long-term offender application, the Crown will seek (i) length of determinate sentence: (ii) length of long-term supervision order:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (a)
(a) On a dangerous offender application, is the Crown seeking (i) an indeterminate sentence, under paragraph 753(4)(a) of the Code? Yes □ No □ (ii) a determinate sentence followed by a long-term supervision order under paragraph 753(4)(b) of the Code? Yes □ No □ (iii) a determinate sentence under paragraph 753(4)(c) of the Code? Yes □ No □ Length:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (i)
(i) an indeterminate sentence, under paragraph 753(4)(a) of the Code? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (ii)
(ii) a determinate sentence followed by a long-term supervision order under paragraph 753(4)(b) of the Code? Yes □ No □
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (iii)
(iii) a determinate sentence under paragraph 753(4)(c) of the Code? Yes □ No □ Length:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) On a long-term offender application, the Crown will seek (i) length of determinate sentence: (ii) length of long-term supervision order:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (ii)
(ii) length of long-term supervision order:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 28
28 Corollary Orders Sought by Crown (a) DNA Order: Yes □ No □ (b) section 109 of the Code prohibition: Yes □ No □ Duration: (c) section 161 of the Code order: Yes □ No □ Duration: (d) Sex Offender Registry Order: Yes □ No □ Sex Offender Registry Order: Yes □ No □ □ 10 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(a) of the Code — maximum sentence of two to five years) □ 20 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(b) of the Code — maximum sentence of 10 to 14 years) □ Life (paragraph 490.013(2)(c) or subsection 490.013(3) of the Code — maximum sentence of life or if was bound by previous Sex Offender Information Registration Act order)
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (b)
(b) section 109 of the Code prohibition: Yes □ No □ Duration:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (c)
(c) section 161 of the Code order: Yes □ No □ Duration:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — (d)
(d) Sex Offender Registry Order: Yes □ No □ Sex Offender Registry Order: Yes □ No □ □ 10 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(a) of the Code — maximum sentence of two to five years) □ 20 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(b) of the Code — maximum sentence of 10 to 14 years) □ Life (paragraph 490.013(2)(c) or subsection 490.013(3) of the Code — maximum sentence of life or if was bound by previous Sex Offender Information Registration Act order)
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
Sex Offender Registry Order: Yes □ No □ □ 10 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(a) of the Code — maximum sentence of two to five years) □ 20 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(b) of the Code — maximum sentence of 10 to 14 years) □ Life (paragraph 490.013(2)(c) or subsection 490.013(3) of the Code — maximum sentence of life or if was bound by previous Sex Offender Information Registration Act order)
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
□ 10 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(a) of the Code — maximum sentence of two to five years)
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
□ 20 years (paragraph 490.013(2)(b) of the Code — maximum sentence of 10 to 14 years)
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
□ Life (paragraph 490.013(2)(c) or subsection 490.013(3) of the Code — maximum sentence of life or if was bound by previous Sex Offender Information Registration Act order)
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 29
29 Time Estimates Crown estimate for evidence and argument: Defence estimate for evidence and argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
Crown estimate for evidence and argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
Defence estimate for evidence and argument:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 30
30 Counsel’s Availability (Including Expert Witnesses) Crown: ( dates ) Defence: ( dates )
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
TAKE NOTICE that the Appellant appeals from the following:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
□ ACQUITTAL □ CONVICTION □ SENTENCE □ ORDER
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 1
1 Place of conviction □ 408 York Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba □ 373 Broadway, Winnipeg, Manitoba □ other:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — 5
5 Date of acquittal, conviction or order:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
The address for service of the appellant is:
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
( address, email address and telephone and fax numbers of the appellant )
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
□ Evidence recorded — transcript ordered
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
□ Appellant seeks to proceed under section 830 of the Code on agreed facts
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
□ Appellant will request a de novo hearing under section 822 of the Code (Notice of Motion is attached)
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
( date ) ( signature of appellant or counsel )
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
( signature of appellant or appellant’s counsel )
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
( name, address, email address and telephone and fax numbers )
Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench — Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench
( if appellant is self-represented, signature of witness )
Transfer of Duties Order — a
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) a of the Public Service Rearrangement and Transfer of Duties Act b , transfers to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada from the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons the powers, duties and functions of the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons under the Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board Act c . a S.C. 2003, c. 22, s. 207 b R.S., c. P-34 c S.C. 1989, c. 3
Order Designating the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada as the appropriate Minister for the purposes of the Act — a
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, pursuant to paragraph (c.1) a of the definition appropriate Minister in section 2 of the Financial Administration Act b , a S.C. 1992, c. 1, s. 69(2) b R.S., c. F-11 (a) repeals Order in Council P.C. 2013-303 c of March 19, 2013; and c SI/2013-30 (b) designates the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada as the appropriate Minister with respect to the Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board for the purposes of the Financial Administration Act b .
Order Designating the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada as the appropriate Minister for the purposes of the Act — (a)
(a) repeals Order in Council P.C. 2013-303 c of March 19, 2013; and c SI/2013-30
Order Designating the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada as the appropriate Minister for the purposes of the Act — (b)
(b) designates the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada as the appropriate Minister with respect to the Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board for the purposes of the Financial Administration Act b .
Proclamation Giving Notice of the Entry into Force on June 26, 2015 of the Annexed Supplementary Convention intended to replace the Convention between Canada and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income — Proclamation Giving Notice of the Entry into Force on June 26, 2015 of the Annexed Supplementary Convention intended to replace the Convention between Canada and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income
ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories QUEEN, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
Proclamation Giving Notice of the Entry into Force on June 26, 2015 of the Annexed Supplementary Convention intended to replace the Convention between Canada and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income — Proclamation Giving Notice of the Entry into Force on June 26, 2015 of the Annexed Supplementary Convention intended to replace the Convention between Canada and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income
TO ALL TO WHOM these presents shall come or whom the same may in any way concern,
Proclamation Giving Notice of the Entry into Force on June 26, 2015 of the Annexed Supplementary Convention intended to replace the Convention between Canada and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income — (a)
Whereas, by Order in Council P.C. 2016-375 of May 20, 2016, the Governor in Council directed that a proclamation do issue giving notice (a) pursuant to subsection 8(4) of An Act to implement conventions between Canada and New Zealand and Canada and Australia for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to income tax , of the day the annexed supplementary convention, which was entered into on May 3, 2012, includes its protocols entered into on that day and on September 12, 2014 and is intended to replace the Convention, as defined in section 2 of that Act, comes into force, which supplementary convention entered into force on June 26, 2015; and (b) pursuant to section 4 of An Act to implement conventions between Canada and New Zealand and Canada and Australia for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to income tax , of the day the Convention, as defined in section 2 of that Act, ceases to be effective, which day corresponds to the date on which the Convention terminates in accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 28 of the annexed supplementary convention;
Proclamation Giving Notice of the Entry into Force on June 26, 2015 of the Annexed Supplementary Convention intended to replace the Convention between Canada and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income — (a)
(a) pursuant to subsection 8(4) of An Act to implement conventions between Canada and New Zealand and Canada and Australia for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to income tax , of the day the annexed supplementary convention, which was entered into on May 3, 2012, includes its protocols entered into on that day and on September 12, 2014 and is intended to replace the Convention, as defined in section 2 of that Act, comes into force, which supplementary convention entered into force on June 26, 2015; and
Proclamation Giving Notice of the Entry into Force on June 26, 2015 of the Annexed Supplementary Convention intended to replace the Convention between Canada and New Zealand for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income — (b)
(b) pursuant to section 4 of An Act to implement conventions between Canada and New Zealand and Canada and Australia for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to income tax , of the day the Convention, as defined in section 2 of that Act, ceases to be effective, which day corresponds to the date on which the Convention terminates in accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 28 of the annexed supplementary convention;