GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Certain Fees in Respect of the Issuance of Temporary Resident Visas for Certain Extended Family (Crisis in Gaza) Remission Order — 2
Remission dates 2 The remission of fees referred to in subsection 1(1) is to be made on the following dates: (a) fees paid before the day on which this Order comes into force are to be remitted on that day; and (b) fees paid during the period beginning on the day that this Order comes into force and ending on April 22, 2025 are to be remitted on April 23, 2025.
Certain Fees in Respect of the Issuance of Temporary Resident Visas for Certain Extended Family (Crisis in Gaza) Remission Order — 3
Coming into force 3 This Order comes into force on the day on which it is registered.
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada, under subsections 20(1) and (3) of the Public Service Employment Act a , approves a S.C. 2003, c. 22, ss. 12 and 13 (a) the re-application by the Public Service Commission of the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded under Order in Council P.C. 1967-444 of March 10, 1967, and to the persons occupying them; and (b) the exclusion by the Public Service Commission from the application of the Act of a person who is appointed and employed outside Canada, who is performing duties that are directly related to diplomatic or consular operations or a military support unit of the Government of Canada located outside Canada and who is subject to the laws of the host country where they are employed.
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — (a)
(a) the re-application by the Public Service Commission of the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded under Order in Council P.C. 1967-444 of March 10, 1967, and to the persons occupying them; and
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — (b)
(b) the exclusion by the Public Service Commission from the application of the Act of a person who is appointed and employed outside Canada, who is performing duties that are directly related to diplomatic or consular operations or a military support unit of the Government of Canada located outside Canada and who is subject to the laws of the host country where they are employed.
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order
Whereas the Public Service Commission has decided, under subsection 20(1) of the Public Service Employment Act a , that it is neither practicable nor in the best interests of the public service to apply certain provisions of that Act to a person who is appointed and employed outside Canada, who is performing duties that are directly related to diplomatic or consular operations or a military support unit of the Government of Canada located outside Canada and who is subject to the laws of the host country where they are employed;
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order
And whereas, under subsection 20(2) of that Act, the Public Service Commission has consulted with the employer;
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — (a)
Therefore, the Public Service Commission, under subsections 20(1) and (3) of the Public Service Employment Act a , (a) re-applies the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded under Order in Council P.C. 1967-444 of March 10, 1967 and to the persons occupying them; and (b) excludes from the application of that Act a person who is appointed and employed outside Canada, who is performing duties that are directly related to diplomatic or consular operations or a military support unit of the Government of Canada located outside Canada and who is subject to the laws of the host country where they are employed.
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — (a)
(a) re-applies the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded under Order in Council P.C. 1967-444 of March 10, 1967 and to the persons occupying them; and
Locally Engaged Staff Exclusion Approval Order — (b)
(b) excludes from the application of that Act a person who is appointed and employed outside Canada, who is performing duties that are directly related to diplomatic or consular operations or a military support unit of the Government of Canada located outside Canada and who is subject to the laws of the host country where they are employed.
Order Acknowledging Receipt of the Assessment Done Under Subsection 23(1) of the Species at Risk Act (American Eel) — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, acknowledges receipt, on the making of this Order, of the assessment done under subsection 23(1) of the Species at Risk Act a by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) with respect to the wildlife species set out in the annexed schedule. a S.C. 2002, c. 29
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, under paragraph 27(1.1)(b) and subsection (1.2) of the Species at Risk Act a , a S.C. 2002, c. 29 (a) decides not to add the American Eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk set out in Schedule 1 to that Act; and (b) approves that the Minister of the Environment include in the public registry established under section 120 of that Act the statement that is attached as the annex to this Order and that sets out the reasons for the decision not to add that species to that List.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — (a)
(a) decides not to add the American Eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk set out in Schedule 1 to that Act; and
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — (b)
(b) approves that the Minister of the Environment include in the public registry established under section 120 of that Act the statement that is attached as the annex to this Order and that sets out the reasons for the decision not to add that species to that List.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
American Eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) In deciding not to add the American Eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) as a threatened species to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk set out in Schedule 1 to the Species at Risk Act (“SARA”), the Governor in Council considered a range of factors to make a decision that provides the greatest overall benefit to Canadians. The Governor in Council has determined that managing the American Eel and its habitat using the Fisheries Act would limit socio-economic impacts and offer flexibility to manage activities impacting the species.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
In deciding not to add the American Eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) as a threatened species to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk set out in Schedule 1 to the Species at Risk Act (“SARA”), the Governor in Council considered a range of factors to make a decision that provides the greatest overall benefit to Canadians. The Governor in Council has determined that managing the American Eel and its habitat using the Fisheries Act would limit socio-economic impacts and offer flexibility to manage activities impacting the species.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
Socio-economic considerations Listing the American Eel as threatened under SARA would trigger the application of the general prohibitions under SARA, making it illegal to kill, harm, harass, capture, take, possess, collect, buy, sell or trade an American Eel or damage the residence of an American Eel. The application of the SARA prohibitions to the American Eel would lead to the closure of all directed commercial fisheries, including Indigenous communal commercial harvesting and aquaculture operations. The closure of the commercial yellow and silver American Eel fishery and the closure of the commercial elver fishery would result in a combined loss of profit for industry that is estimated to be $12.7 million per year. Specifically, the closure of the commercial yellow and silver American Eel fishery would result in an estimated loss of profit of $1.1 million per year for the more than 100 active commercial and Indigenous communal commercial harvesters of adult eels. In addition, the long-term closure of the commercial elver fishery would result in a loss of profit for the industry that is estimated to be $11.6 million per year for the 11 elver licence holders, including three Indigenous communal commercial licence holders that were active in 2023. The annual loss of profit for aquaculture facilities resulting from the inability to source eels in Canada cannot be estimated at this time due to a lack of data. It is anticipated that listing the American Eel under SARA would have an impact on the sectors that hold, process, package and ship adult eels and elvers. Furthermore, there could be economic impacts on facilities, such as hydroelectricity dams, to comply with SARA.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
Listing the American Eel as threatened under SARA would trigger the application of the general prohibitions under SARA, making it illegal to kill, harm, harass, capture, take, possess, collect, buy, sell or trade an American Eel or damage the residence of an American Eel.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
The application of the SARA prohibitions to the American Eel would lead to the closure of all directed commercial fisheries, including Indigenous communal commercial harvesting and aquaculture operations. The closure of the commercial yellow and silver American Eel fishery and the closure of the commercial elver fishery would result in a combined loss of profit for industry that is estimated to be $12.7 million per year. Specifically, the closure of the commercial yellow and silver American Eel fishery would result in an estimated loss of profit of $1.1 million per year for the more than 100 active commercial and Indigenous communal commercial harvesters of adult eels. In addition, the long-term closure of the commercial elver fishery would result in a loss of profit for the industry that is estimated to be $11.6 million per year for the 11 elver licence holders, including three Indigenous communal commercial licence holders that were active in 2023. The annual loss of profit for aquaculture facilities resulting from the inability to source eels in Canada cannot be estimated at this time due to a lack of data. It is anticipated that listing the American Eel under SARA would have an impact on the sectors that hold, process, package and ship adult eels and elvers. Furthermore, there could be economic impacts on facilities, such as hydroelectricity dams, to comply with SARA.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
Management of the American Eel By continuing to manage the American Eel under the Fisheries Act , Fisheries and Oceans Canada (“DFO”) can reduce some negative effects on the species and its habitat while sustainably managing the American Eel fisheries. In addition, under that Act, DFO can enhance scientific information about population size and trends that will guide management decisions and improve the safe migration of the American Eel throughout its Canadian range. DFO will continue to implement science and management measures designed to address ongoing threats to the American Eel in Canadian waters. Examples of ongoing measures include improving fish passage at existing facilities, implementing a Precautionary Approach Framework for the commercial yellow and silver American Eel fishery and shortening the recreational fishing seasons. Further, the Possession and Export of Elvers Regulations , which were published in Part II of the Canada Gazette on December 18, 2024, aim to improve the sustainable management of the elver fishery in Atlantic Canada. DFO is also committed to the ongoing implementation of management measures that contribute to the recovery and conservation of the species. This includes initiatives such as supporting habitat rehabilitation and restoration projects in collaboration with Indigenous Peoples and partners and funding projects benefiting eel passage during migration. DFO has and will continue to assess the American Eel population in Canada and consider all scientific advice in making management decisions with conservation in mind. Since the publication of the assessment and status report on the American Eel by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada in 2012, many management measures have been implemented and considerable progress has been made, such as reducing possession limits in recreational fisheries and implementing individual river catch limits. Further, an ongoing initiative has resulted in hundreds of American Eel commercial licences becoming permanently retired through the conversion of eel licences to licences in relation to other species and by buying out licences.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
By continuing to manage the American Eel under the Fisheries Act , Fisheries and Oceans Canada (“DFO”) can reduce some negative effects on the species and its habitat while sustainably managing the American Eel fisheries. In addition, under that Act, DFO can enhance scientific information about population size and trends that will guide management decisions and improve the safe migration of the American Eel throughout its Canadian range. DFO will continue to implement science and management measures designed to address ongoing threats to the American Eel in Canadian waters. Examples of ongoing measures include improving fish passage at existing facilities, implementing a Precautionary Approach Framework for the commercial yellow and silver American Eel fishery and shortening the recreational fishing seasons. Further, the Possession and Export of Elvers Regulations , which were published in Part II of the Canada Gazette on December 18, 2024, aim to improve the sustainable management of the elver fishery in Atlantic Canada. DFO is also committed to the ongoing implementation of management measures that contribute to the recovery and conservation of the species. This includes initiatives such as supporting habitat rehabilitation and restoration projects in collaboration with Indigenous Peoples and partners and funding projects benefiting eel passage during migration. DFO has and will continue to assess the American Eel population in Canada and consider all scientific advice in making management decisions with conservation in mind.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel) — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decision Not to Add Certain Species) Order (American Eel)
Since the publication of the assessment and status report on the American Eel by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada in 2012, many management measures have been implemented and considerable progress has been made, such as reducing possession limits in recreational fisheries and implementing individual river catch limits. Further, an ongoing initiative has resulted in hundreds of American Eel commercial licences becoming permanently retired through the conversion of eel licences to licences in relation to other species and by buying out licences.
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — a
Whereas, under subsection 83.05(8.1) a of the Criminal Code b , the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness has reviewed each entity set out in the annexed Schedule 1 and listed in the Regulations Establishing a List of Entities c , made under subsection 83.05(1) d of that Act, and has determined that there are still reasonable grounds, as set out in subsection 83.05(1) d of that Act, for each entity to remain a listed entity; a S.C. 2019, c. 13, s. 141(4) b R.S., c. C-46 c SOR/2002-284 d S.C. 2019, c. 13, s. 141(1)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Whereas, under subsection 83.05(1) d of that Act, the Governor in Council is satisfied, on the recommendation of that Minister, that there are reasonable grounds to believe that each listed entity set out in the annexed Schedule 1 has knowingly carried out, attempted to carry out, participated in or facilitated a terrorist activity or that has knowingly acted on behalf of, at the direction of or in association with such an entity;
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Whereas, under subsection 83.05(8.1) a of that Act, that Minister has reviewed the entity set out in the annexed Schedule 2 and listed in those Regulations, and has determined that there are no longer reasonable grounds, as set out in subsection 83.05(1) d of that Act, for the entity to remain a listed entity;
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
And whereas, under subsection 83.05(1) d of that Act, the Governor in Council is satisfied, on the recommendation of that Minister, that there are no longer reasonable grounds to believe that the listed entity set out in the annexed Schedule 2 has knowingly carried out, attempted to carry out, participated in or facilitated a terrorist activity or that has knowingly acted on behalf of, at the direction of or in association with such an entity;
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Therefore, Her Excellency the Governor General in Council accepts the recommendation of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, made under subsection 83.05(8.1) a of the Criminal Code b , that each listed entity set out in the annexed Schedule 1 remain a listed entity and that the entity in the annexed Schedule 2 no longer remain a listed entity.
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Al-Ashtar Brigades (also known among other names as Saraya al-Ashtar, Al Ashtar Brigades, The Ashtar Brigades, Saraya Waad Allah, Wa’ad Allah Brigades, Islamic Allah Brigades, Imam al-Mahdi Brigades, al-Haydariyah Brigades)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Al Qaida (also known among other names as Al Jihad (AJ), Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ), Vanguards of Conquest (VOC), The Islamic Army, Islamic Salvation Foundation, The Base, Group for the Preservation of the Holy Sites, Islamic Army for the Liberation of the Holy Places, World Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders, Usama Bin Ladin Network, Usama Bin Ladin Organization, Qa'idat al-Jihad )
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Ansar Dine (also known among other names as Ansar al-Dine, Ansar al-Din, Ancar Dine, Ansar ul-Din, Ansar Eddine, Defenders of the Faith, Jum’a Ansar al-din al-salafiya, Harakat Ansar al-Dine, Harakat Ansar al-Din, Ansar Din, Ansar ed dine, Ansar Dine Sud, Ansar Dine katiba (brigade) Khalid Ibn al-Walid)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Atomwaffen Division (also known among other names as AWD, National Socialist Order, NSO)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Fatemiyoun Division (also known among other names as Fatemioun Brigade, Fatemioun Military Division, Fatemiyoun, Fatemiyoun Battalion, Fatemiyoun Force, Fatemiyyun, Liwa Fatemiyoun, Liwa al-Fatemiyon, Fatemiyon Brigade, Fatemiyon Division, Fatemiyoun Brigade)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Front de Liberation du Macina (also known among other names as FLM, Macina Liberation Front, Massina Liberation Front, Katiba Massina, Massina Brigade, Macina Brigade, Katiba Macina, Katibat Macina, Ansar Dine Macina, Harakat Ansar al-Din Macina Brigade, Ansar al-Din South, Macina Batallion, Macina Liberation Movement, La Force de Libération du Macina, ML Movement, Massina Liberation Movement, Ansar al-Din Macina Brigade, Katibat Macina – Ansar Dine, Ansar al-Din Macina, MLF, MLM)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Hizbul Mujahideen (also known among other names as HM, Hizb-ul-Mujahideen)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Islamic State – Bangladesh (also known among other names as Daesh – Bangladesh)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Islamic State East Asia (also known among other names as ISEA, Daesh’s East Asia Province, Islamic State-Philippines, Ansharul Khilafah Philippines, Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters – Bungos, Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters – Abubakar, Jama’atu al-Muhajirin wal Ansar fil Filibin, Dawlah Islamiyah, Islamic State Lanao, Maute Group, Islamic State Ranao, Dawlatul Islamiyah Waliyatul Masrik, Islamic State Sunrise Province)
Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities — Order Accepting the Recommendation of the Minister Regarding the List of Entities
Islamic State – Khorasan Province (ISKP) (also known among other names as Islamic State in the Khorasan Province, Islamic State Khorasan, Islamic State – Khorasan, IS Khorasan, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Khorasan (ISIL-K), Islamic State of Iraq and Syria – Khorasan (ISIS-K), Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham – Khorasan (ISIS-K), Wilayat Khorasan, Daesh Khorasan, ISIL's South Asia Branch, ISIS Wilayat Khorasan, Islamic State's Khorasan Province, South Asian chapter of ISIL, ISIL Khorasan (ISIL-K), Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State, Islamic State Wilayat Khorasan (ISWK), Khorasan branch of ISIS)