GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 141.
141. The Commission considers that, for the purposes of a local forbearance application by an ILEC, a local exchange is the appropriate geographic component of the relevant market.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 2.
2. Paragraphs 242 to 281 of the Decision are replaced by the following: 242. The Commission considers that, if an ILEC can satisfy the following criteria, then the requirements of section 34 of the Act for a forbearance determination will have been met and the Commission may therefore grant local forbearance in accordance with that section: a) the ILEC demonstrates that one of the following circumstances exists in the relevant market: (i) that the ILEC does not have market power, based on the criteria set out in paragraph 213, (ii) that, if the ILEC offers residential local exchange services, there are, in addition to the ILEC, at least 2 independent facilities-based telecommunications service providers, including providers of mobile wireless services, each of which offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of residential local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving, and at least one of which, in addition to the ILEC, is a facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider, or (iii) that, if the ILEC offers business local exchange services, there is, in addition to the ILEC, at least one other independent facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider that offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of business local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving; b) the ILEC demonstrates that, during a six-month period, beginning no earlier than eight months before its application for local forbearance and ending at any time before the Commission’s decision respecting the application, (i) it met, on average, the quality of service standard for each indicator set out in Appendix B, as defined in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors , with respect to the services provided to competitors in its territory, and (ii) it did not consistently provide any of those competitors with services that were below those quality of service standards. 243. For the purposes of subparagraphs 242a)(ii) and (iii) and paragraph 523, the Commission considers that a telecommunications service provider is independent if it does not have the same owner as, and is not affiliated with, any other service provider referred to in the respective subparagraph. Further, for the purpose of those provisions, the Commission considers that a facilities-based telecommunications service provider is one that provides services in the relevant market either by using its own facilities and services or by using a combination of its own facilities and services together with those leased from other service providers.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 242.
242. The Commission considers that, if an ILEC can satisfy the following criteria, then the requirements of section 34 of the Act for a forbearance determination will have been met and the Commission may therefore grant local forbearance in accordance with that section: a) the ILEC demonstrates that one of the following circumstances exists in the relevant market: (i) that the ILEC does not have market power, based on the criteria set out in paragraph 213, (ii) that, if the ILEC offers residential local exchange services, there are, in addition to the ILEC, at least 2 independent facilities-based telecommunications service providers, including providers of mobile wireless services, each of which offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of residential local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving, and at least one of which, in addition to the ILEC, is a facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider, or (iii) that, if the ILEC offers business local exchange services, there is, in addition to the ILEC, at least one other independent facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider that offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of business local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — a)
a) the ILEC demonstrates that one of the following circumstances exists in the relevant market: (i) that the ILEC does not have market power, based on the criteria set out in paragraph 213, (ii) that, if the ILEC offers residential local exchange services, there are, in addition to the ILEC, at least 2 independent facilities-based telecommunications service providers, including providers of mobile wireless services, each of which offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of residential local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving, and at least one of which, in addition to the ILEC, is a facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider, or (iii) that, if the ILEC offers business local exchange services, there is, in addition to the ILEC, at least one other independent facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider that offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of business local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — (i)
(i) that the ILEC does not have market power, based on the criteria set out in paragraph 213,
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — (ii)
(ii) that, if the ILEC offers residential local exchange services, there are, in addition to the ILEC, at least 2 independent facilities-based telecommunications service providers, including providers of mobile wireless services, each of which offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of residential local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving, and at least one of which, in addition to the ILEC, is a facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider, or
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — (iii)
(iii) that, if the ILEC offers business local exchange services, there is, in addition to the ILEC, at least one other independent facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider that offers local exchange services in the market and is capable of serving at least 75% of the number of business local exchange service lines that the ILEC is capable of serving;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — b)
b) the ILEC demonstrates that, during a six-month period, beginning no earlier than eight months before its application for local forbearance and ending at any time before the Commission’s decision respecting the application, (i) it met, on average, the quality of service standard for each indicator set out in Appendix B, as defined in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors , with respect to the services provided to competitors in its territory, and (ii) it did not consistently provide any of those competitors with services that were below those quality of service standards.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — (i)
(i) it met, on average, the quality of service standard for each indicator set out in Appendix B, as defined in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-20, Finalization of quality of service rate rebate plan for competitors , with respect to the services provided to competitors in its territory, and
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — (ii)
(ii) it did not consistently provide any of those competitors with services that were below those quality of service standards.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 243.
243. For the purposes of subparagraphs 242a)(ii) and (iii) and paragraph 523, the Commission considers that a telecommunications service provider is independent if it does not have the same owner as, and is not affiliated with, any other service provider referred to in the respective subparagraph. Further, for the purpose of those provisions, the Commission considers that a facilities-based telecommunications service provider is one that provides services in the relevant market either by using its own facilities and services or by using a combination of its own facilities and services together with those leased from other service providers.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 3.
3. Paragraphs 483 to 488 of the Decision are replaced by the following: 483. The Commission removes the existing competitive safeguards for promotions, as defined in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-25, Promotions of local wireline services , removes the local winback rule as set out in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , as amended by Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28-1 and confirmed by Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53, permits the ex parte filing of tariff applications for promotions and permits the waiving of service charges for residential local winbacks.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 483.
483. The Commission removes the existing competitive safeguards for promotions, as defined in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-25, Promotions of local wireline services , removes the local winback rule as set out in Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , as amended by Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28-1 and confirmed by Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53, permits the ex parte filing of tariff applications for promotions and permits the waiving of service charges for residential local winbacks.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 512.
512. The Commission will establish a process for dealing with applications for local forbearance filed pursuant to the framework set out in this Decision.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 513.
513. In an application for local forbearance, the ILEC should provide evidence that it has satisfied all the criteria referred to in paragraph 242 or indicate that it will make the demonstration referred to in paragraph 242b) after filing the application. Each application should only be with reference to one relevant market and should list the tariff items and associated tariff numbers of the services for which the ILEC is requesting local forbearance.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 514.
514. An application for local forbearance should be accompanied by a draft communications plan for the Commission’s approval. The plan should describe how the ILEC intends to explain local forbearance to customers in the relevant market, provide information concerning the ongoing availability of stand-alone PES in the market and provide contact information for customers who have questions or concerns.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 515.
515. If an applicant ILEC is making applications for a number of contiguous local exchanges, the ILEC may request that the Commission determine those applications together.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 516.
516. The applicant ILEC will, prior to filing, serve a copy of its application on all registered CLECs and any other known TSP providing local exchange service in the relevant market. Other parties that may be interested in commenting on such applications for local forbearance will be responsible for monitoring the Commission’s website in order to be aware of when such applications have been filed.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 517.
517. The Commission will post the application to its website once it is received. The Commission notes that applications that are deficient in providing all of the required information, or that are not accompanied by all of the required documents, will be returned to the applicant ILEC.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 518.
518. The Commission notes that it may request that the applicant ILEC or others provide further information or documents that it considers necessary to determine whether local forbearance is warranted.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 519.
519. In establishing a process for dealing with applications for local forbearance, the Commission considers it important to provide a process that allows for timely decisions to be rendered for those applications. Consequently, if the ILEC provides all the required information and documents in the required form, the Commission undertakes, subject to paragraphs 520 to 522, to complete its analysis of, and render its decision respecting applications which rely on paragraph 242a)(ii) or (iii) within 120 days after the day on which the application is received.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 520.
520. Applications for local forbearance that propose a division of business local exchange services into multiple relevant markets will not be subject to the undertaking.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 521.
521. If the applicant ILEC indicates in its application that it will make the demonstration referred to in paragraph 242b) after filing the application, the Commission will commence its analysis of the application, but the application will not be subject to the undertaking.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 522.
522. Applications for local forbearance that relate to local exchanges that are located wholly or partially within the census metropolitan area of Calgary, Edmonton, Halifax, Hamilton, London, Montreal, Ottawa-Gatineau, Quebec City, Toronto, Vancouver or Winnipeg, will be given priority by the Commission.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 523.
523. If, prior to granting local forbearance, the Commission is informed that the ILEC’s application is based on competition in the relevant market from an independent fixed-line telecommunications service provider that, including all of its affiliates, has less than 20,000 local exchange services customers in Canada, the forbearance will not be effective until at least 18 months after the day on which the service provider began providing local exchange services in that market.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 5.
5. Appendix A of the Decision is repealed.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 6.
6. Appendix B of the Decision is replaced by the following: Appendix B Competitor Quality of Service Indicators Indicator Title Standard Indicator 1.8 New Unbundled Type A and B Loop Order Service Intervals Met 90% or more Indicator 1.9 Migrated Unbundled Type A and B Loop Order Service Intervals Met 90% or more Indicator 1.10 LNP Order (Stand-alone) Service Interval Met 90% or more Indicator 1.11 Competitor Interconnection Trunk Order Service Interval Met 90% or more Indicator 1.12 Local Service Requests, Confirmed Due Dates Met 90% or more Indicator 1.19 Confirmed Due Dates Met — CDN Services and Type C Loops 90% or more Indicator 2.7 Competitor Out-of-Service Trouble Reports Cleared within 24 hours 80% or more Indicator 2.9 Competitor Degraded Trouble Reports Cleared within 48 hours 90% or more Indicator 2.10 Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) — CDN Services and Type C Loops 4 hours or less
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 7.
7. Appendix D and Appendix E of the Decision are repealed.
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-15 — 8.
8. The Decision shall otherwise continue to apply, but any provisions in the Decision that are inconsistent with this Order shall be interpreted in accordance with this Order to the extent of the inconsistency.
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, pursuant to section 43 a of the Fisheries Act , hereby makes the annexed Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 . a S.C. 1991, c. 1, s. 12
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — 1
1 The following definitions apply in these Regulations. Fishing Zone has the same meaning as in the Oceans Act . ( zone de pêche ) management area or Area means a division of Canadian fisheries waters as enumerated and described in Schedule 2 and includes the portion of any stream that flows into that division and that is seaward of the mean high water mark near the mouth of that stream. ( secteur or secteur d’exploitation ) mile means nautical mile. ( mille ) shoreline means the apparent high water mark. ( rivage ) Subarea means a subdivision of a management area. ( sous-secteur ) surfline means the lines described in Schedule 1. ( ligne de démarcation )
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007
Fishing Zone has the same meaning as in the Oceans Act . ( zone de pêche )
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007
management area or Area means a division of Canadian fisheries waters as enumerated and described in Schedule 2 and includes the portion of any stream that flows into that division and that is seaward of the mean high water mark near the mouth of that stream. ( secteur or secteur d’exploitation )
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007
shoreline means the apparent high water mark. ( rivage )
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007
Subarea means a subdivision of a management area. ( sous-secteur )
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007
surfline means the lines described in Schedule 1. ( ligne de démarcation )
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — 2
2 All geographical co-ordinates referenced in the schedules are provided in the North American Datum 83 (NAD 83) geodetic system.
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — 3
3 All lines joining the geographical co-ordinates of points described in the schedules are interpreted as rhumb lines.
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — 4
4 These Regulations apply to the Canadian fisheries waters of the Pacific Ocean.
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — 5
5 The areas in the Canadian fisheries waters of the Pacific Ocean described in Schedule 2 are hereby prescribed as management areas.
Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations, 2007 — 7
7 These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — a
Whereas in accordance with paragraph 5(a) of the First Nations Commercial and Industrial Development Act a the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs has received a resolution of the council of the Fort McKay First Nation requesting that the Minister recommend to the Governor in Council the making of the annexed Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations ; a S.C. 2005, c. 53
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations
And whereas in accordance with paragraph 5(b) of that Act the Fort McKay Oil Sands Intergovernmental Agreement has been concluded between the Minister, the Province of Alberta and the council of the Fort McKay First Nation for the administration and enforcement of the Regulations by the provincial officials and bodies specified in the Regulations;
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations
Therefore, Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, pursuant to section 3 of the First Nations Commercial and Industrial Development Act a , hereby makes the annexed Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations .
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — 1
Definitions 1 (1) The following definitions apply in these Regulations. federal Minister means the Minister of Indigenous Services. ( ministre fédéral ) First Nation means the Fort McKay First Nation. ( Première Nation ) incorporated laws means the laws of Alberta specified in Schedule 1, as amended from time to time, with the adaptations specified in Schedule 2. ( texte législatif incorporé ) project lands means the lands in Alberta in Theoretical Township 96, Range 9, West of the 4th Meridian that are part of the Fort McKay Indian Reserve No. 174C and are shown on the Plan Showing Survey of Fort McKay Settlement (Oil Sands Lands) recorded in the Canada Lands Surveys Records under number 90264 and registered at the Land Titles Office in Edmonton under number 052 2726, containing 3381.48 hectares (8355.8 acres) more or less and more particularly described as follows: (a) Lot 1, Block 1 1304.11 ha (3222.5 ac); (b) Lot 1, Block 2 830.57 ha (2052.4 ac); (c) Lot 2, Block 2 1109.11 ha (2740.7 ac); and (d) Lot 3, Block 2 137.69 ha (340.2 ac). ( terres du projet ) regulation , for the purposes of Schedules 1 and 2, has the same meaning as in the Alberta Regulations Act (RSA 2000 cR-14), as amended from time to time. ( règlement ) Interpretation Act of Alberta (2) The incorporated laws that apply with respect to the project lands under section 3 must be interpreted in accordance with the Interpretation Act of Alberta, RSA 2000, c. I-8, as amended from time to time. Enactment (3) For the purposes of the Interpretation Act of Alberta (RSA 2000, c. I-8), a reference to “enactment” in that Act is to be read to include the incorporated laws. Provincial offences (4) For the purposes of enforcing these Regulations, a reference to “enactment” in provincial offences procedures laws is to be read to include the incorporated laws. SOR/2023-280, s. 1
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations
federal Minister means the Minister of Indigenous Services. ( ministre fédéral )
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations
First Nation means the Fort McKay First Nation. ( Première Nation )
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations
incorporated laws means the laws of Alberta specified in Schedule 1, as amended from time to time, with the adaptations specified in Schedule 2. ( texte législatif incorporé )
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — (a)
project lands means the lands in Alberta in Theoretical Township 96, Range 9, West of the 4th Meridian that are part of the Fort McKay Indian Reserve No. 174C and are shown on the Plan Showing Survey of Fort McKay Settlement (Oil Sands Lands) recorded in the Canada Lands Surveys Records under number 90264 and registered at the Land Titles Office in Edmonton under number 052 2726, containing 3381.48 hectares (8355.8 acres) more or less and more particularly described as follows: (a) Lot 1, Block 1 1304.11 ha (3222.5 ac); (b) Lot 1, Block 2 830.57 ha (2052.4 ac); (c) Lot 2, Block 2 1109.11 ha (2740.7 ac); and (d) Lot 3, Block 2 137.69 ha (340.2 ac). ( terres du projet )
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations
regulation , for the purposes of Schedules 1 and 2, has the same meaning as in the Alberta Regulations Act (RSA 2000 cR-14), as amended from time to time. ( règlement )
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — 2
Purpose 2 The purpose of these Regulations is to implement with respect to the project lands a legal regime that is harmonized with the legal regime of Alberta that governs oil sands mining and related activities.
Fort McKay First Nation Oil Sands Regulations — 3
Incorporation by reference 3 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the incorporated laws apply with respect to the project lands. Restriction — laws in force (2) A provision of an incorporated law applies only if it is in force. SOR/2023-280, s. 2