GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Criminal Code — C-46 664
No reference to previous conviction 664 No indictment in respect of an offence for which, by reason of previous convictions, a greater punishment may be imposed shall contain any reference to previous convictions. R.S., c. C-34, s. 591
Criminal Code — C-46 666
Evidence of character 666 Where, at a trial, the accused adduces evidence of his good character, the prosecutor may, in answer thereto, before a verdict is returned, adduce evidence of the previous conviction of the accused for any offences, including any previous conviction by reason of which a greater punishment may be imposed. R.S., c. C-34, s. 593
Criminal Code — C-46 668 and 669
668 and 669 [Repealed, 1995, c. 22, s. 4]
Criminal Code — C-46 669.1
Jurisdiction 669.1 (1) Where any judge, court or provincial court judge by whom or which the plea of the accused or defendant to an offence was taken has not commenced to hear evidence, any judge, court or provincial court judge having jurisdiction to try the accused or defendant has jurisdiction for the purpose of the hearing and adjudication. Adjournment (2) Any court, judge or provincial court judge having jurisdiction to try an accused or a defendant, or any clerk or other proper officer of the court, or in the case of an offence punishable on summary conviction, any justice, may, at any time before or after the plea of the accused or defendant is taken, adjourn the proceedings. R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 137
Criminal Code — C-46 669.2
Continuation of proceedings 669.2 (1) Subject to this section, where an accused or a defendant is being tried by (a) a judge or provincial court judge, (b) a justice or other person who is, or is a member of, a summary conviction court, or (c) a court composed of a judge and jury, as the case may be, and the judge, provincial court judge, justice or other person dies or is for any reason unable to continue, the proceedings may be continued before another judge, provincial court judge, justice or other person, as the case may be, who has jurisdiction to try the accused or defendant. Where adjudication is made (2) Where a verdict was rendered by a jury or an adjudication was made by a judge, provincial court judge, justice or other person before whom the trial was commenced, the judge, provincial court judge, justice or other person before whom the proceedings are continued shall, without further election by an accused, impose the punishment or make the order that is authorized by law in the circumstances. If no adjudication made (3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), if the trial was commenced but no adjudication was made or verdict rendered, the judge, provincial court judge, justice or other person before whom the proceedings are continued shall, without further election by an accused, commence the trial again as if no evidence on the merits had been taken. If no adjudication made — jury trials (4) If a trial that is before a court composed of a judge and a jury was commenced but no adjudication was made or verdict rendered, the judge before whom the proceedings are continued may, without further election by an accused, continue the trial or commence the trial again as if no evidence on the merits had been taken. Where trial continued (5) Where a trial is continued under subsection (4), any evidence that was adduced before a judge referred to in paragraph (1)(c) is deemed to have been adduced before the judge before whom the trial is continued but, if the prosecutor and the accused consent, any part of that evidence may be adduced again before the judge before whom the trial is continued. R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 137; 1994, c. 44, s. 65; 2011, c. 16, s. 15 2022, c. 17, s. 40(E)
Criminal Code — C-46 669.3
Jurisdiction when appointment to another court 669.3 Where a court composed of a judge and a jury, a judge or a provincial court judge is conducting a trial and the judge or provincial court judge is appointed to another court, he or she continues to have jurisdiction in respect of the trial until its completion. 1994, c. 44, s. 66
Criminal Code — C-46 670
Judgment not to be stayed on certain grounds 670 Judgment shall not be stayed or reversed after verdict on an indictment (a) by reason of any irregularity in the summoning or empanelling of the jury; or (b) for the reason that a person who served on the jury was not returned as a juror by a sheriff or other officer. R.S., c. C-34, s. 598
Criminal Code — C-46 671
Directions respecting jury or jurors directory 671 No omission to observe the directions contained in any Act with respect to the qualification, selection, balloting or distribution of jurors, the preparation of the jurors’ book, the selecting of jury lists or the drafting of panels from the jury lists is a ground for impeaching or quashing a verdict rendered in criminal proceedings. R.S., c. C-34, s. 599
Criminal Code — C-46 672
Saving powers of court 672 Nothing in this Act alters, abridges or affects any power or authority that a court or judge had immediately before April 1, 1955, or any practice or form that existed immediately before April 1, 1955, with respect to trials by jury, jury process, juries or jurors, except where the power or authority, practice or form is expressly altered by or is inconsistent with this Act. R.S., c. C-34, s. 600
Criminal Code — C-46
accused includes a defendant in summary conviction proceedings and an accused in respect of whom a verdict of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder has been rendered; ( accusé )
Criminal Code — C-46
assessment means an assessment by a medical practitioner or any other person who has been designated by the Attorney General as being qualified to conduct an assessment of the mental condition of the accused under an assessment order made under section 672.11 or 672.121, and any incidental observation or examination of the accused; ( évaluation )
Criminal Code — C-46
chairperson includes any alternate that the chairperson of a Review Board may designate to act on the chairperson’s behalf; ( président )
Criminal Code — C-46
court includes a summary conviction court as defined in section 785, a judge, a justice and a judge of the court of appeal as defined in section 673; ( tribunal )
Criminal Code — C-46
disposition means an order made by a court or Review Board under section 672.54, an order made by a court under section 672.58 or a finding made by a court under subsection 672.64(1); ( décision )
Criminal Code — C-46
dual status offender means an offender who is subject to a sentence of imprisonment in respect of one offence and a custodial disposition under paragraph 672.54(c) in respect of another offence; ( contrevenant à double statut )
Criminal Code — C-46
high-risk accused means an accused who is found to be a high-risk accused by a court under subsection 672.64(1); ( accusé à haut risque )
Criminal Code — C-46
hospital means a place in a province that is designated by the Minister of Health for the province for the custody, treatment or assessment of an accused in respect of whom an assessment order, a disposition or a placement decision is made; ( hôpital )
Criminal Code — C-46
medical practitioner means a person who is entitled to practise medicine by the laws of a province; ( médecin )
Criminal Code — C-46 (a)
party , in relation to proceedings of a court or Review Board to make or review a disposition, means (a) the accused, (b) the person in charge of the hospital where the accused is detained or is to attend pursuant to an assessment order or a disposition, (c) an Attorney General designated by the court or Review Board under subsection 672.5(3), (d) any interested person designated by the court or Review Board under subsection 672.5(4), or (e) where the disposition is to be made by a court, the prosecutor of the charge against the accused; ( parties )
Criminal Code — C-46
placement decision means a decision by a Review Board under subsection 672.68(2) as to the place of custody of a dual status offender; ( ordonnance de placement )
Criminal Code — C-46
prescribed means prescribed by regulations made by the Governor in Council under section 672.95; ( Version anglaise seulement )
Criminal Code — C-46
Review Board means the Review Board established or designated for a province pursuant to subsection 672.38(1); ( commission d’examen )
Criminal Code — C-46
verdict of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder means a verdict that the accused committed the act or made the omission that formed the basis of the offence with which the accused is charged but is not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. ( verdict de non-responsabilité criminelle pour cause de troubles mentaux )
Criminal Code — C-46 672.11
Assessment order 672.11 A court having jurisdiction over an accused in respect of an offence may order an assessment of the mental condition of the accused, if it has reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence is necessary to determine (a) whether the accused is unfit to stand trial; (b) whether the accused was, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, suffering from a mental disorder so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility by virtue of subsection 16(1); (c) whether the balance of the mind of the accused was disturbed at the time of commission of the alleged offence, where the accused is a female person charged with an offence arising out of the death of her newly-born child; (d) the appropriate disposition to be made, where a verdict of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder or unfit to stand trial has been rendered in respect of the accused; (d.1) whether a finding that the accused is a high-risk accused should be revoked under subsection 672.84(3); or (e) whether an order should be made under section 672.851 for a stay of proceedings, where a verdict of unfit to stand trial has been rendered against the accused. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 1995, c. 22, s. 10; 2005, c. 22, s. 2; 2014, c. 6, s. 3
Criminal Code — C-46 672.12
Where court may order assessment 672.12 (1) The court may make an assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the accused or, subject to subsections (2) and (3), on application of the prosecutor. Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment of fitness (2) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused is unfit to stand trial for an offence that is prosecuted by way of summary conviction, the court may only order the assessment if (a) the accused raised the issue of fitness; or (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is fit to stand trial. Limitation on prosecutor’s application for assessment (3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if (a) the accused puts his or her mental capacity for criminal intent into issue; or (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder. 1991, c. 43, s. 4
Criminal Code — C-46 672.121
Review Board may order assessment 672.121 The Review Board that has jurisdiction over an accused found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder or unfit to stand trial may order an assessment of the mental condition of the accused of its own motion or on application of the prosecutor or the accused, if it has reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence is necessary to (a) make a recommendation to the court under subsection 672.851(1); (b) make a disposition under section 672.54 in one of the following circumstances: (i) no assessment report on the mental condition of the accused is available, (ii) no assessment of the mental condition of the accused has been conducted in the last twelve months, or (iii) the accused has been transferred from another province under section 672.86; or (c) determine whether to refer to the court for review under subsection 672.84(1) a finding that an accused is a high-risk accused. 2005, c. 22, s. 3; 2014, c. 6, s. 4
Criminal Code — C-46 672.13
Contents of assessment order 672.13 (1) An assessment order must specify (a) the service that or the person who is to make the assessment, or the hospital where it is to be made; (b) whether the accused is to be detained in custody while the order is in force; and (c) the period that the order is to be in force, including the time required for the assessment and for the accused to travel to and from the place where the assessment is to be made. Form (2) An assessment order may be in Form 48 or 48.1. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 4
Criminal Code — C-46 672.14
General rule for period 672.14 (1) An assessment order shall not be in force for more than thirty days. Exception in fitness cases (2) No assessment order to determine whether the accused is unfit to stand trial shall be in force for more than five days, excluding holidays and the time required for the accused to travel to and from the place where the assessment is to be made, unless the accused and the prosecutor agree to a longer period not exceeding thirty days. Exception for compelling circumstances (3) Despite subsections (1) and (2), a court or Review Board may make an assessment order that remains in force for sixty days if the court or Review Board is satisfied that compelling circumstances exist that warrant it. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 5
Criminal Code — C-46 672.15
Extension 672.15 (1) Subject to subsection (2), a court or Review Board may extend an assessment order, of its own motion or on the application of the accused or the prosecutor made during or at the end of the period during which the order is in force, for any further period that is required, in its opinion, to complete the assessment of the accused. Maximum duration of extensions (2) No extension of an assessment order shall exceed thirty days, and the period of the initial order together with all extensions shall not exceed sixty days. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 6
Criminal Code — C-46 672.16
Presumption against custody 672.16 (1) Subject to subsection (3), an accused shall not be detained in custody under an assessment order of a court unless (a) the court is satisfied that on the evidence custody is necessary to assess the accused, or that on the evidence of a medical practitioner custody is desirable to assess the accused and the accused consents to custody; (b) custody of the accused is required in respect of any other matter or by virtue of any other provision of this Act; or (c) the prosecutor, having been given a reasonable opportunity to do so, shows that detention of the accused in custody is justified on either of the grounds set out in subsection 515(10). Presumption against custody — Review Board (1.1) If the Review Board makes an order for an assessment of an accused under section 672.121, the accused shall not be detained in custody under the order unless (a) the accused is currently subject to a disposition made under paragraph 672.54(c); (b) the Review Board is satisfied on the evidence that custody is necessary to assess the accused, or that on the evidence of a medical practitioner custody is desirable to assess the accused and the accused consents to custody; or (c) custody of the accused is required in respect of any other matter or by virtue of any other provision of this Act. Residency as a condition of disposition (1.2) Subject to paragraphs (1.1)(b) and (c), if the accused is subject to a disposition made under paragraph 672.54(b) that requires the accused to reside at a specified place, an assessment ordered under section 672.121 shall require the accused to reside at the same place. Report of medical practitioner (2) For the purposes of paragraphs (1)(a) and (1.1)(b), if the prosecutor and the accused agree, the evidence of a medical practitioner may be received in the form of a report in writing. Presumption of custody in certain circumstances (3) An assessment order made in respect of an accused who is detained under subsection 515(6) or 522(2) shall order that the accused be detained in custody under the same circumstances referred to in that subsection, unless the accused shows that custody is not justified under the terms of that subsection. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 7
Criminal Code — C-46 672.17
Assessment order takes precedence over bail hearing 672.17 During the period that an assessment order made by a court in respect of an accused charged with an offence is in force, no order for the interim release or detention of the accused may be made by virtue of Part XVI or section 679 in respect of that offence or an included offence. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 8
Criminal Code — C-46 672.18
Application to vary assessment order 672.18 Where at any time while an assessment order made by a court is in force the prosecutor or an accused shows cause, the court may vary the terms of the order respecting the interim release or detention of the accused in such manner as it considers appropriate in the circumstances. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 9(F)
Criminal Code — C-46 672.19
No treatment order on assessment 672.19 No assessment order may direct that psychiatric or any other treatment of the accused be carried out, or direct the accused to submit to such treatment. 1991, c. 43, s. 4
Criminal Code — C-46 672.191
When assessment completed 672.191 An accused in respect of whom an assessment order is made shall appear before the court or Review Board that made the order as soon as practicable after the assessment is completed and not later than the last day of the period that the order is to be in force. 1997, c. 18, s. 81; 2005, c. 22, s. 10
Criminal Code — C-46 672.2
Assessment report 672.2 (1) An assessment order may require the person who makes the assessment to submit in writing an assessment report on the mental condition of the accused. Assessment report to be filed (2) An assessment report shall be filed with the court or Review Board that ordered it, within the period fixed by the court or Review Board, as the case may be. Court to send assessment report to Review Board (3) The court shall send to the Review Board without delay a copy of any report filed with it pursuant to subsection (2), to assist in determining the appropriate disposition to be made in respect of the accused. Copies of reports to accused and prosecutor (4) Subject to subsection 672.51(3), copies of any report filed with a court or Review Board under subsection (2) shall be provided without delay to the prosecutor, the accused and any counsel representing the accused. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 11
Criminal Code — C-46 672.21
Definition of protected statement 672.21 (1) In this section, protected statement means a statement made by the accused during the course and for the purposes of an assessment or treatment directed by a disposition, to the person specified in the assessment order or the disposition, or to anyone acting under that person’s direction. Protected statements not admissible against accused (2) No protected statement or reference to a protected statement made by an accused is admissible in evidence, without the consent of the accused, in any proceeding before a court, tribunal, body or person with jurisdiction to compel the production of evidence. Exceptions (3) Notwithstanding subsection (2), evidence of a protected statement is admissible for the purpose of (a) determining whether the accused is unfit to stand trial; (b) making a disposition or placement decision respecting the accused; (c) determining, under section 672.84, whether to refer to the court for review a finding that an accused is a high-risk accused or whether to revoke such a finding; (d) determining whether the balance of the mind of the accused was disturbed at the time of commission of the alleged offence, where the accused is a female person charged with an offence arising out of the death of her newly-born child; (e) determining whether the accused was, at the time of the commission of an alleged offence, suffering from automatism or a mental disorder so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility by virtue of subsection 16(1), if the accused puts his or her mental capacity for criminal intent into issue, or if the prosecutor raises the issue after verdict; (f) challenging the credibility of an accused in any proceeding where the testimony of the accused is inconsistent in a material particular with a protected statement that the accused made previously; or (g) establishing the perjury of an accused who is charged with perjury in respect of a statement made in any proceeding. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 2005, c. 22, s. 12; 2014, c. 6, s. 5
Criminal Code — C-46 672.22
Presumption of fitness 672.22 An accused is presumed fit to stand trial unless the court is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the accused is unfit to stand trial. 1991, c. 43, s. 4
Criminal Code — C-46 672.23
Court may direct issue to be tried 672.23 (1) Where the court has reasonable grounds, at any stage of the proceedings before a verdict is rendered, to believe that the accused is unfit to stand trial, the court may direct, of its own motion or on application of the accused or the prosecutor, that the issue of fitness of the accused be tried. Burden of proof (2) An accused or a prosecutor who makes an application under subsection (1) has the burden of proof that the accused is unfit to stand trial. 1991, c. 43, s. 4
Criminal Code — C-46 672.24
Counsel 672.24 (1) Where the court has reasonable grounds to believe that an accused is unfit to stand trial and the accused is not represented by counsel, the court shall order that the accused be represented by counsel. Counsel fees and disbursements (2) Where counsel is assigned pursuant to subsection (1) and legal aid is not granted to the accused pursuant to a provincial legal aid program, the fees and disbursements of counsel shall be paid by the Attorney General to the extent that the accused is unable to pay them. Taxation of fees and disbursements (3) Where counsel and the Attorney General cannot agree on the fees or disbursements of counsel, the Attorney General or the counsel may apply to the registrar of the court and the registrar may tax the disputed fees and disbursements. 1991, c. 43, s. 4; 1997, c. 18, s. 82
Criminal Code — C-46 672.25
Postponing trial of issue 672.25 (1) The court shall postpone directing the trial of the issue of fitness of an accused in proceedings for an offence for which the accused may be prosecuted by indictment or that is punishable on summary conviction, until the prosecutor has elected to proceed by way of indictment or summary conviction. Idem (2) The court may postpone directing the trial of the issue of fitness of an accused (a) where the issue arises before the close of the case for the prosecution at a preliminary inquiry, until a time that is not later than the time the accused is called on to answer to the charge; or (b) where the issue arises before the close of the case for the prosecution at trial, until a time not later than the opening of the case for the defence or, on motion of the accused, any later time that the court may direct. 1991, c. 43, s. 4
Criminal Code — C-46 672.26
Trial of issue by judge and jury 672.26 Where an accused is tried or is to be tried before a court composed of a judge and jury, (a) if the judge directs that the issue of fitness of the accused be tried before the accused is given in charge to a jury for trial on the indictment, a jury composed of the number of jurors required in respect of the indictment in the province where the trial is to be held shall be sworn to try that issue and, with the consent of the accused, the issues to be tried on the indictment; and (b) if the judge directs that the issue of fitness of the accused be tried after the accused has been given in charge to a jury for trial on the indictment, the jury shall be sworn to try that issue in addition to the issues in respect of which it is already sworn. 1991, c. 43, s. 4