GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 8
8 The prosecutor having consented, ENTERING INTO A RECOGNIZANCE, without sureties, in the amount of $ on the Applicant depositing that sum of money or other valuable security with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, with the following conditions: (a) (b) ( Set out applicable conditions mentioned in subsections 515(4) to (4.2) of the Criminal Code ) (c)
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 9
9 Being not ordinarily resident in the Northwest Territories or not ordinarily residing within two hundred kilometres of the place in which the Applicant is in custody, ENTERING INTO A RECOGNIZANCE, without sureties, in the amount of $ on the Applicant depositing that sum of money or other valuable security with the Clerk of the Supreme Court.
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 10
10 Being not ordinarily resident in the Northwest Territories or not ordinarily residing within two hundred kilometres of the place in which the Applicant is in custody, ENTERING INTO A RECOGNIZANCE, with surety (or sureties), in the amount of $ on the Applicant depositing that sum of money or other valuable security with the Clerk of the Supreme Court.
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 11
11 Being not ordinarily resident in the Northwest Territories or not ordinarily residing within two hundred kilometres of the place in which the Applicant is in custody, ENTERING INTO A RECOGNIZANCE, without sureties, in the amount of $ on the Applicant depositing that sum of money or other valuable security with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, with the following conditions: (a) (b) ( Set out applicable conditions mentioned in subsections 515(4) to (4.2) of the Criminal Code ) (c)
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 12
12 Being not ordinarily resident in the Northwest Territories or not ordinarily residing within two hundred kilometres of the place in which the Applicant is in custody, ENTERING INTO A RECOGNIZANCE, with surety (or sureties), in the amount of $ on the Applicant depositing that sum of money or other valuable security with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, with the following conditions: (a) (b) ( Set out applicable conditions mentioned in subsections 515(4) to (4.2) of the Criminal Code ) (c)
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 1
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 1 The undertaking may be given by the Applicant to (or recognizance may be entered into by the Applicant before) any Justice of the Peace in and for the Northwest Territories or the Clerk of the Supreme Court; 2 Any Justice of the Peace in and for the Northwest Territories may order that the Applicant be brought before the Justice for the purpose of giving the undertaking (or entering into the recognizance) and being released from custody, and this order shall be sufficient authority to any person having the custody of the Applicant in the Northwest Territories to have the Applicant brought before a Justice of the Peace for that purpose; 3 If the Applicant is brought before a Justice of the Peace and gives the undertaking (or enters into the recognizance) as set out in this order, the person having custody of the Applicant shall release him (or her) forthwith.
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 1
1 The undertaking may be given by the Applicant to (or recognizance may be entered into by the Applicant before) any Justice of the Peace in and for the Northwest Territories or the Clerk of the Supreme Court;
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 2
2 Any Justice of the Peace in and for the Northwest Territories may order that the Applicant be brought before the Justice for the purpose of giving the undertaking (or entering into the recognizance) and being released from custody, and this order shall be sufficient authority to any person having the custody of the Applicant in the Northwest Territories to have the Applicant brought before a Justice of the Peace for that purpose;
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 3
3 If the Applicant is brought before a Justice of the Peace and gives the undertaking (or enters into the recognizance) as set out in this order, the person having custody of the Applicant shall release him (or her) forthwith.
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: AGENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ENTERED this day of , 19 Clerk of the Supreme Court
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
Note: This form is a model standard form of order that can be used as the model for actual orders. Only the appropriate paragraphs from the model standard form should be incorporated into the actual order as required.
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
UPON IT APPEARING THAT ( name of accused or witness ) is in custody at ( name of institution ) at ( community ) , ( territory or province ) ;
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
AND UPON IT APPEARING THAT the attendance of ( name ) is required before the Court of the Northwest Territories on ( month ) ( day ) , 19 at a.m. (or p.m.), at ( community ) , in the Northwest Territories;
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Warden of the ( name of institution ) surrender ( name of prisoner ) to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police escort bearing this Order so that ( name of prisoner ) may be brought under such escort before the ( community ) Court of the Northwest Territories sitting at , Northwest Territories on ( month ) ( day ) , 19 , at a.m. (or p.m.).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ( name ) be kept in custody of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at ( community ) and elsewhere in the Northwest Territories as may be necessary until his (or her) attendance in Court is no longer required, at which time he (or she) shall be returned under safe escort by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to the Warden at ( name of institution ) in ( community ) , ( territory or province ) , who shall receive him (or her) or as otherwise ordered by the Court.
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
TAKE NOTICE THAT ( name of party ) will bring an application on ( month, day, year ) at a.m. (or p.m.) at ( specify address of court house ) for an order granting ( set out precise relief sought ).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 1
THE GROUNDS FOR THIS APPLICATION ARE: 1 2 ( State concisely each issue to be raised ) 3
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 2
2 ( State concisely each issue to be raised )
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 1
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES TO BE ARGUED ARE: 1 2 3
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 1
THE STATUTORY PROVISION OR RULES ON WHICH THE APPLICANT RELIES ARE: 1 2 3
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 1
IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT RELIES ON THE FOLLOWING: 1 ( Briefly describe the documents such as affidavits, transcripts, etc., on which the Applicant relies )
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 1
1 ( Briefly describe the documents such as affidavits, transcripts, etc., on which the Applicant relies )
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — 
Expected mode of trial: [ ] Re-election expected [ ] Crown consenting ( if required )
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — (a)
Number of witnesses: ( specify if expert ) (a) Crown (b) Defence
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, on the information and complaint of ( name of informant ) , ( Where the appellant is not Her Majesty the Queen then only the name of the informant who is the appellant should be set out )
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
TAKE NOTICE that the Attorney General of Canada ( or, where the Appellant is not the Attorney General of Canada, insert name of the informant ) intends to appeal and does hereby appeal from an order dismissing the information of ( name of informant ) against the Respondent, made by ( name of presiding judge or justice ) at ( place of adjudication ) on ( date of adjudication ) .
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The information that was dismissed charged the Respondent ( state fully offence or offences charged ).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
( If appeal is from sentence, add : TAKE NOTICE that the Attorney General of Canada ( or, where the appellant is not the Attorney General of Canada, insert name of the informant ) intends to appeal and does hereby appeal the sentence passed on the Respondent following a conviction (or convictions) made by ( name of presiding judge, magistrate or justice of the peace ) at ( place of adjudication ) on ( date of adjudication ) . The offence (or offences) of which the Respondent was convicted was (or were) ( state fully offence or offences ) and the sentence passed by the summary conviction court was ( state particulars of sentence ) and was passed on ( month, day, year ) .)
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
TAKE NOTICE that the Attorney General of Canada ( or, where the appellant is not the Attorney General of Canada, insert name of the informant ) intends to appeal and does hereby appeal the sentence passed on the Respondent following a conviction (or convictions) made by ( name of presiding judge, magistrate or justice of the peace ) at ( place of adjudication ) on ( date of adjudication ) .
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The offence (or offences) of which the Respondent was convicted was (or were) ( state fully offence or offences ) and the sentence passed by the summary conviction court was ( state particulars of sentence ) and was passed on ( month, day, year ) .)
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The following is the order the Attorney General ( or the informant, as the case may be ) asks to be made: ( Here set out order sought ).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The grounds of appeal are: ( set out grounds with particularity ).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The address for service of the Attorney General of Canada at Yellowknife is: Department of Justice 3rd Floor, Joe Tobie Building P.O. BOX 8 YELLOWKNIFE NT X1A 2N1
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
( Substitute informant’s address for service where the Attorney General of Canada is not the Appellant. )
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
( Where the Respondent is not Her Majesty the Queen, the style of cause should clearly identify the Respondent )
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
TAKE NOTICE that the Appellant intends to appeal and does hereby appeal from the conviction (or sentence or conviction and sentence) made by ( name of presiding judge or justice ) at ( place of adjudication ) on ( date of adjudication ) .
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The offence of which the Appellant was convicted was ( state fully the offence or offences on which the appellant was convicted ).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
( Add, if applicable : The sentence of the summary conviction court that convicted the Appellant was ( state sentence passed ) and was passed on ( state date of sentence ) .)
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The following is the order the Appellant asks to be made: ( here set out nature of order sought ).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The Appellant does (or does not) wish to appear personally or by counsel and will present his (or her or its) argument or appeal orally (or in writing).
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
The Appellant’s ( add, where applicable: and his (or her or its) counsel’s) address for service in the Northwest Territories is (or are):
Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories — Criminal Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
APPEAL IS AGAINST: ( state whether appeal is against conviction, sentence or both )
Charitable Goods Remission Order — a
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of National Revenue, pursuant to subsection 23(2) a of the Financial Administration Act , hereby makes the annexed Charitable Goods Remission Order . a S.C. 1991, c. 24, s. 7(2)
Charitable Goods Remission Order — 1
1 Remission is hereby granted of all the taxes paid or payable under Division III of Part IX and under any other Part of the Excise Tax Act , and of the customs duties paid or payable under section 21 of the Customs Tariff , on goods donated by a non-resident of Canada to religious, charitable or educational institutions in Canada.
Charitable Goods Remission Order — 3
3 This Order comes into force on January 1, 1998.
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
The Minister of Industry, pursuant to paragraph 10(1)(i) a of the Weights and Measures Act and sections 13 b and 27 b of the Weights and Measures Regulations c , hereby establishes the annexed Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) .
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
June 15, 1998 John Manley Minister of Industry
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — 1
 e represents the verification scale interval. ( nombre d’échelons de vérification ) on-board weighing system means a weighing device designed to be an integral part of, or attached or secured to, the frame, chassis, lifting mechanism or bed of mobile equipment such as a truck, tractor, trailer or forklift. ( système de pesage monté sur véhicule ) verification scale interval or e means a value, specified by the manufacturer and expressed in units of mass, that is used for the classification and inspection of a weighing device. ( échelon de vérification ou e ) weight classifier means a weighing device with a digital indicating element that rounds a weight value up to the next verification scale interval. ( appareil classificateur ) (2) In these Specifications, a reference to a verification scale interval or actual scale interval refers to that of the weighing range or partial weighing range, as the case may be, that is being tested. SI/2005-85, s. 1
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — (a)
actual scale interval or d means the value, expressed in units of mass (a) with respect to analogue indications, of the difference between the values corresponding to two consecutive scale marks; and (b) with respect to digital indications, the difference between two consecutively indicated values. ( échelon réel ou d )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
automatic indicating device means a weighing device in which the position of equilibrium is obtained without an operator’s intervention. ( appareil de pesage à équilibre automatique )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
auxiliary indicating element means a rider, a vernier or, in the case of a digital indicating device, the last figure after the decimal sign that is clearly differentiated from other figures such as by size, shape or colour. ( dispositif indicateur auxiliaire )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
initial zero-setting mechanism means a feature that automatically sets a weighing device to zero at the time the device is switched on and before it is ready for use. ( dispositif de mise à zéro initiale )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
maximum capacity or Max means the maximum weighing capacity of a weighing device and, in the case of a multiple range device, the maximum weighing capacity of the relevant range. ( portée maximale ou Max )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — (a)
metrological function means a function of a weighing device that is necessary for the measurement process — including the sensing of the measured quantity, the transmission, processing, storage and correction or adjustment of measurement signals or values and the indication or printing of measurement values — and that can impact on the final quantity determination or price calculation or affect the validity of transactions. Metrological functions include, but are not limited to, (a) displaying or printing gross, tare, net and negative weight values, zero, and unit and total prices; (b) setting zero, linearity, sensitivity, scale intervals, maximum capacity and motion detection; and (c) performing the computation and rounding of price and weight values and the storing of values. ( fonction métrologique )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — (a)
module means a part of a weighing device that (a) performs a specific metrological function; (b) can be examined and tested separately; and (c) is subject to the error limits set out in these Specifications. ( module )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — (a)
multi-interval device means a weighing device (a) that has a single weighing range divided into partial weighing ranges, each of which has a different scale interval; and (b) in which the appropriate partial weighing range is automatically determined according to the load applied, both for increasing and decreasing loads. ( appareil à échelons multiples )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — (a)
multiple range device means a weighing device that (a) has, for the same weighing and load-receiving element, two or more weighing ranges, each of which (i) extends from zero to the maximum capacity of the range, and (ii) has a different verification scale interval; and (b) selects automatically, or permits the operator to select manually, any of the weighing ranges. ( appareil à étendues multiples )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
non-automatic indicating device means a weighing device that requires an operator’s intervention to obtain equilibrium, such as an equal-arm scale with weights. ( appareil de pesage à équilibre non automatique )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
non-automatic weighing device or weighing device means a weighing machine that weighs discrete loads and that requires an operator’s intervention during the weighing process, such as to deposit the load to be measured on the weighing and load-receiving element and to remove it therefrom or to obtain weight results. ( appareil de pesage à fonctionnement non automatique ou appareil de pesage )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
number of verification scale intervals means the value obtained by using the following formula: Max/e where Max represents the maximum capacity, and e represents the verification scale interval. ( nombre d’échelons de vérification )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
on-board weighing system means a weighing device designed to be an integral part of, or attached or secured to, the frame, chassis, lifting mechanism or bed of mobile equipment such as a truck, tractor, trailer or forklift. ( système de pesage monté sur véhicule )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
verification scale interval or e means a value, specified by the manufacturer and expressed in units of mass, that is used for the classification and inspection of a weighing device. ( échelon de vérification ou e )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998)
weight classifier means a weighing device with a digital indicating element that rounds a weight value up to the next verification scale interval. ( appareil classificateur )
Specifications Relating to Non-automatic Weighing Devices (1998) — 2
2 (1) Subject to subsection (2), these Specifications apply to any non-automatic weighing device and to any equipment or accessory that is attached to the device or used in conjunction with it. (2) A non-automatic weighing device that, before June 15, 1998, was approved under subsection 3(1) of the Weights and Measures Act or inspected under the terms of a previous enactment — or whose class, type or design was so approved — (a) is subject to the performance requirements set out in these Specifications; and (b) is not subject to any of the provisions of these Specifications relating to design, composition, construction or marking where the non-automatic weighing device meets the requirements that applied when its class, type or design was approved or, failing which, that applied to the device on its approval or inspection. SI/2005-85, s. 2