GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — 6
6 A Party shall determine the applicant’s eligibility and shall notify the liaison agency or competent institution of the other Party of its decision to grant or deny the benefit and the reason for its denial.
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017
The Parties shall exchange statistics on an annual basis regarding the payments that each has made under the Convention. These statistics shall include data on the number of beneficiaries and the total amount of benefits paid, by type of benefit.
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — 1
1 The Parties shall decide on the forms and detailed procedures necessary to implement the Convention and this Administrative Agreement.
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — 2
2 The Parties shall use the mutually accepted forms to communicate with each other.
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017
This Administrative Agreement shall enter into force on the date of receipt of the second notification by which the Parties notify each other by diplomatic note that they have completed the internal legal procedures necessary for the entry into force of this Administrative Agreement. This Administrative Agreement shall remain in force for the same period as the Convention.
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Administrative Agreement.
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017
DONE in duplicate at Ottawa, this 10th day of April 2014, in the English, French and Spanish languages, each version being equally authentic.
Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017 — Proclamation giving notice of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru and the Administrative Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Peru for the Implementation of the Convention on Social Security between Canada and the Republic of Peru Come into Force on March 1, 2017
For the Government of the Republic of Peru
Order Acknowledging Receipt of the Assessments Done Pursuant to Subsection 23(1) of the Act — a
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, acknowledges receipt, on the making of this Order, of assessments done pursuant to subsection 23(1) of the Species at Risk Act a by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada with respect to the status of the species set out in the annexed schedule. a S.C. 2002, c. 29
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — a
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, pursuant to subsections 27(1.1) and (1.2) of the Species at Risk Act , a a S.C. 2002, c. 29 (a) decides not to add the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna ( Thunnus thynnus ) or the Yellowmouth Rockfish ( Sebastes reedi ) to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk set out in Schedule 1 to that Act; and (b) approves that the Minister of the Environment include in the public registry established under section 120 of that Act the statement that is attached as the annex to this Order and that sets out the reasons for the decisions not to add those species to that List.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — (a)
(a) decides not to add the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna ( Thunnus thynnus ) or the Yellowmouth Rockfish ( Sebastes reedi ) to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk set out in Schedule 1 to that Act; and
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — (b)
(b) approves that the Minister of the Environment include in the public registry established under section 120 of that Act the statement that is attached as the annex to this Order and that sets out the reasons for the decisions not to add those species to that List.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
The Minister of the Environment has recommended, on the advice of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, that the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna not be added to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk (the “List”) set out in Schedule 1 to the Species at Risk Act (“SARA”).
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
Adding the species to the List would result in significant and immediate socio-economic impacts on industry due to the application of the general prohibitions. If it is not listed under SARA, the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (“ABT”) will continue to be managed under the Fisheries Act .
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
Listing the ABT as endangered under SARA and the subsequent closure of the directed and by-catch fisheries, including commercial harvesting, charter boat and Aboriginal commercial-communal fisheries, would result in significant socio-economic impacts on industry and communities in the region, including Aboriginal communities. The non-listing option received support from most of those who responded during consultations during the information-gathering stage, including the majority of the provinces, Aboriginal organizations and potentially impacted stakeholders.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
As the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (“ICCAT”) recommends the annual total allowable catch (“TAC”) and allocates it among contracting parties, including Canada, listing the species under SARA would not be expected to have a significant positive impact on the species, since the closure of the Canadian fishery could result in ICCAT reallocating or transferring the Canadian quota to other countries, resulting in no net decrease in fishing mortality for ABT. Furthermore, some of the other contracting parties to ICCAT do not have the comprehensive tagging and dockside monitoring requirements that the Canadian fishery has and, therefore, reallocated quota may not be as tightly monitored. Additionally, the Canadian fishery provides key indexes of abundance for the assessment of the stock, which would be lost if the fishery were discontinued.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
Since the publication of the assessment and status report of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (“COSEWIC”) in 2011, the ABT population has been re-evaluated by ICCAT and a full stock assessment was undertaken in 2014. Based on this most recent assessment, ICCAT noted that the western stock has been increasing in recent years, and the biomass is projected to continue to increase under current catches (2015 global TAC: 2 000 t).
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
If the species is not listed under SARA, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans will continue to manage, under the Fisheries Act , the recommended annual TAC allocated by ICCAT. It will implement a set of management measures to address the needs of the species, in particular through prioritizing the drafting of an updated Integrated Fisheries Management Plan that is consistent, to the extent possible, with the national Sustainable Fisheries Framework (“SFF”); will undertake a risk assessment of current catch monitoring for each of the existing fleets that harvest ABT; will review at-sea observer coverage levels in the fleets that interact with ABT and will review existing monitoring documents to identify necessary amendments or additions to improve data collection in both the directed and incidental-catch fisheries. This may lead to more accurate post-release mortality estimates and additional ecological benefits due to increased knowledge of the species and its interaction with the ecosystem.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
Yellowmouth Rockfish ( Sebastes reedi ) The Minister of the Environment has recommended, on the advice of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, that the Yellowmouth Rockfish not be added to the List set out in Schedule 1 to SARA Adding the species to the List would result in significant and immediate negative socio-economic impacts on industry due to the triggering of the general prohibitions and the incremental benefits would likely be small. If it is not listed under SARA, the Yellowmouth Rockfish will continue to be managed under the Fisheries Act as part of the integrated groundfish fishery. Current management measures in this fishery include the establishment of individual transferable quotas and TAC provisions guided by scientific advice and the SFF, mandatory 100% at-sea and dockside monitoring, and accountability for all rockfish catches (released and retained). Since the implementation of the Commercial Groundfish Integration Program in 2006, all reported rockfish catches have remained within the prescribed TAC and conservation objectives for rockfish have been met. Additional management measures will be implemented to enhance existing mechanisms, including more frequent updates to stock assessments to enable timely implementation of management measures under the Fisheries Act . As the current harvest is 1% of the current biomass and the Yellowmouth Rockfish is considered to be in the healthy zone of the SFF, no changes to the TAC are proposed at this time. If the population falls below the healthy zone, the TAC will be adjusted based on updated scientific information. These management measures can achieve the conservation outcomes associated with the species.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
The Minister of the Environment has recommended, on the advice of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, that the Yellowmouth Rockfish not be added to the List set out in Schedule 1 to SARA
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
Adding the species to the List would result in significant and immediate negative socio-economic impacts on industry due to the triggering of the general prohibitions and the incremental benefits would likely be small.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
If it is not listed under SARA, the Yellowmouth Rockfish will continue to be managed under the Fisheries Act as part of the integrated groundfish fishery. Current management measures in this fishery include the establishment of individual transferable quotas and TAC provisions guided by scientific advice and the SFF, mandatory 100% at-sea and dockside monitoring, and accountability for all rockfish catches (released and retained).
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Decisions Not to Add Certain Species) Order
Since the implementation of the Commercial Groundfish Integration Program in 2006, all reported rockfish catches have remained within the prescribed TAC and conservation objectives for rockfish have been met. Additional management measures will be implemented to enhance existing mechanisms, including more frequent updates to stock assessments to enable timely implementation of management measures under the Fisheries Act . As the current harvest is 1% of the current biomass and the Yellowmouth Rockfish is considered to be in the healthy zone of the SFF, no changes to the TAC are proposed at this time. If the population falls below the healthy zone, the TAC will be adjusted based on updated scientific information. These management measures can achieve the conservation outcomes associated with the species.
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — a
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, pursuant to section 20 of the Public Service Employment Act a , approves a S.C. 2003, c. 22, ss. 12 and 13 (a) the re-application of the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded pursuant to Order in Council P.C. 2010-1113 b and to the persons occupying them; and b SI/2010-73 (b) the exclusion of positions designated by the position numbers 00025450 to 00025460 in the Office of the Governor General’s Secretary and the persons occupying those positions from the application of that Act, with the exception of the definitions Commission and public service in subsection 2(1) and of sections 17 to 21, 54 and 55, 68 to 72, subsection 111(1) c , sections 112 to 116, section 118, sections 120 to 122, and section 134 and 135 of that Act. c S.C. 2014, c. 2, s. 55
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — (a)
(a) the re-application of the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded pursuant to Order in Council P.C. 2010-1113 b and to the persons occupying them; and b SI/2010-73
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — (b)
(b) the exclusion of positions designated by the position numbers 00025450 to 00025460 in the Office of the Governor General’s Secretary and the persons occupying those positions from the application of that Act, with the exception of the definitions Commission and public service in subsection 2(1) and of sections 17 to 21, 54 and 55, 68 to 72, subsection 111(1) c , sections 112 to 116, section 118, sections 120 to 122, and section 134 and 135 of that Act. c S.C. 2014, c. 2, s. 55
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order
Whereas the Public Service Commission, having decided that it is neither practicable nor in the best interests of the public service to apply certain provisions of the Public Service Employment Act a to positions designated by the position numbers 00025450 to 00025460 in the Office of the Governor General’s Secretary and to the persons occupying those positions, has decided, pursuant to subsection 20(1) of that Act, to exclude those positions and persons from the application of the Act, with the exception of the definitions Commission and public service in subsection 2(1) and of sections 17 to 21, 54 and 55, 68 to 72, subsection 111(1) c , sections 112 to 116, section 118, sections 120 to 122, and section 134 and 135 of that Act;
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order
And whereas, pursuant to subsection 20(2) of the Public Service Employment Act a , the Public Service Commission has consulted with the employer;
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — (a)
Therefore, the Public Service Commission, pursuant to section 20 of the Public Service Employment Act a , (a) reapplies the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded pursuant to Order in Council P.C. 2010-1113 b and to the persons occupying them; and (b) excludes positions designated by the position numbers 00025450 to 00025460 in the Office of the Governor General’s Secretary and the persons occupying those positions from the application of that Act with the exception of the definitions Commission and public service in subsection 2(1) and of sections 17 to 21, 54 and 55, 68 to 72, subsection 111(1) c , sections 112 to 116, section 118, sections 120 to 122, and section 134 and 135 of that Act.
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — (a)
(a) reapplies the provisions of that Act to the positions excluded pursuant to Order in Council P.C. 2010-1113 b and to the persons occupying them; and
Office of the Governor General’s Secretary Exclusion Approval Order — (b)
(b) excludes positions designated by the position numbers 00025450 to 00025460 in the Office of the Governor General’s Secretary and the persons occupying those positions from the application of that Act with the exception of the definitions Commission and public service in subsection 2(1) and of sections 17 to 21, 54 and 55, 68 to 72, subsection 111(1) c , sections 112 to 116, section 118, sections 120 to 122, and section 134 and 135 of that Act.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (referral back to COSEWIC) Order — (a)
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, pursuant to subsections 27(1.1) and (1.2) of the Species at Risk Act a (a) refers the assessment of the status of the Spring Salamander ( Gyrinophilus porphyriticus ) Carolinian population back to the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) for further consideration; and (b) approves that the Minister of the Environment include in the public registry established under section 120 of that Act the statement that is attached as the schedule to this Order and that sets out the reasons for the referral back to COSEWIC.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (referral back to COSEWIC) Order — (a)
(a) refers the assessment of the status of the Spring Salamander ( Gyrinophilus porphyriticus ) Carolinian population back to the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) for further consideration; and
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (referral back to COSEWIC) Order — (b)
(b) approves that the Minister of the Environment include in the public registry established under section 120 of that Act the statement that is attached as the schedule to this Order and that sets out the reasons for the referral back to COSEWIC.
List of Wildlife Species at Risk (referral back to COSEWIC) Order — List of Wildlife Species at Risk (referral back to COSEWIC) Order
The Carolinian population of the Spring Salamander, a large lungless salamander, was historically recorded in the Niagara Regional Municipality in southern Ontario. When COSEWIC assessed the Spring Salamander ( Gyrinophilus porphyriticus ) Carolinian population in 2011, it assigned a status of extirpated to this species because no valid records of it had been documented for more than 50 years. However, since the publication of the assessment, new and emerging information regarding that population has become available that COSEWIC would like to consider in the assessment of the species. Therefore the assessment of this species is referred back to COSEWIC for consideration.
Order Acknowledging Receipt of the Assessments Done Pursuant to Subsection 23(1) of the Act — Order Acknowledging Receipt of the Assessments Done Pursuant to Subsection 23(1) of the Act
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of the Environment, acknowledges receipt, on the making of this Order, of the assessments done pursuant to subsection 23(1) of the Species at Risk Act a by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) with respect to the species set out in the annexed schedule.
Remission Order in Respect of Fees Paid by Certain Foreign Nationals for the Processing of Applications for Temporary Resident Permits, Work Permits and Restorations of Temporary Resident Status — a
His Excellency the Governor General in Council, considering that it is in the public interest to do so, on the recommendation of the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and the Treasury Board, pursuant to subsection 23(2.1) a of the Financial Administration Act b , makes the annexed Remission Order in Respect of Fees Paid by Certain Foreign Nationals for the Processing of Applications for Temporary Resident Permits, Work Permits and Restorations of Temporary Resident Status . a S.C. 1991, c. 24, s. 7(2) b R.S., c. F-11