GreatNorthCollective/greatnorth-canada-federal-laws-text huggingface dataset:
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 22
Basic or extraordinary expenses 22 (1) A person whose property is affected by the application of section 2 may apply to the Minister in writing for a certificate to exempt the property from the application of that section if the property is necessary for basic or extraordinary expenses or is subject to a lien, mortgage or security interest, to a hypothec or prior claim, to a charge or to a judicial, administrative or arbitral decision. Certificate (2) If it is established in accordance with Security Council Resolution 1718 that the property is necessary for basic or extraordinary expenses or that it is subject to a lien, mortgage or security interest, to a hypothec or prior claim, to a charge or to a judicial, administrative or arbitral decision, the Minister must issue a certificate within the following time periods: (a) within 15 working days after receiving the application, in the case of property necessary for basic expenses, if the Committee of the Security Council did not oppose the application; (b) within 30 working days after receiving the application, in the case of property necessary for extraordinary expenses, if the Committee of the Security Council approved the application; and (c) within 90 working days after receiving the application, in the case of property that is subject to a lien, mortgage or security interest, to a hypothec or prior claim, to a charge or to a judicial, administrative or arbitral decision that (i) was created or issued before the person became a designated person, (ii) is not for the benefit of a designated person, and (iii) has been brought to the attention of the Committee of the Security Council by the Minister. SOR/2020-119, s. 2
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 23
Mistaken identity 23 (1) A person whose name is the same as or similar to the name of a designated person and that claims not to be that designated person may apply to the Minister in writing for a certificate stating that they are not that designated person. Determination by Minister (2) Within 45 working days after receiving the application, the Minister must (a) issue the certificate, if it is established that the applicant is not the designated person; or (b) provide notice to the applicant of his or her determination, if it is not so established. SOR/2020-119, s. 2
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 24
Vessels 24 (1) A person whose vessel is subject to a measure taken under subsection 18(1) based on a decision made under paragraph 18(1)(c) may apply in writing to the Minister for a reconsideration of that decision. Favourable decision (2) If the Minister believes that subparagraph 18(1)(c)(i) or (ii) no longer applies to the vessel, the Minister must notify the applicant and the Chief Registrar of his or her decision and the Chief Registrar must rescind the measure taken. Unfavourable decision (3) If the Minister believes that subparagraph 18(1)(c)(i) or (ii) continues to apply to the vessel, the Minister must notify the applicant of the decision to confirm the measure. New application (4) If there has been a material change in circumstances since the last application was submitted under subsection (1), a person may submit another application to the Minister. SOR/2020-119, s. 2
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 25
Communication by Minister 25 (1) The Minister may, for the purpose of enforcing these Regulations or fulfilling any obligation under a resolution of the Security Council with respect to the DPRK or to respond to a request from the Security Council or any of its subsidiary organs, disclose any personal information to an official or to the Security Council or any of its subsidiary organs. Receipt of information (2) An official may receive any personal information disclosed to them under subsection (1). Communication by official (3) An official may, for the purpose of administering or enforcing these Regulations or fulfilling an obligation under a resolution of the Security Council with respect to the DPRK or to respond to a request from the Security Council or any of its subsidiary organs, disclose any personal information to the Minister. SOR/2020-119, s. 2
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 3
3 For the purpose of paragraph 11(2)(a) of the Statutory Instruments Act , these Regulations apply before they are published in the Canada Gazette .
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 12
12 For the purpose of paragraph 11(2)(a) of the Statutory Instruments Act , these Regulations apply before they are published in the Canada Gazette .
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 6
6 For the purpose of paragraph 11(2)(a) of the Statutory Instruments Act , these Regulations apply before they are published in the Canada Gazette .
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) — 32
32 For the purpose of paragraph 11(2)(a) of the Statutory Instruments Act , these Regulations apply before they are published in the Canada Gazette .
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas, on May 12, 2005, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission rendered Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 (“the Decision”), entitled Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol ;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas, in the Decision, the Commission set out the details of the regulatory regime applicable to the provision of local Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services and determined that those services were part of the same market as local exchange services, that it would not be appropriate to forbear from regulating those services and that the regulatory framework governing local competition, set out in Telecom Decision CRTC 97-8, entitled Local Competition , and subsequent determinations, applied to those services, except as otherwise provided in the Decision;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas, on June 30, 2005, the Commission amended the Decision, under Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28-1;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council, by Order in Council P.C. 2006-305 of May 4, 2006, which was made pursuant to subsections 12(1) and (5) of the Telecommunications Act (“the Act”), referred the Decision back to the Commission for reconsideration, which had to be completed within 120 days after the day on which the Order was made;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas, on September 1, 2006, the Commission issued Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53, entitled Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , in which it confirmed the Decision, including its finding that it would not be appropriate to forbear from regulating local VoIP services without an examination of the entire relevant market for local exchange services;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas, in the Decision, the Commission imposed the same regulatory regime on both local access-dependent and access-independent VoIP services;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that retail local access-dependent and access-independent VoIP services are quite different from each other;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas retail local access-dependent VoIP services are services for which access and service are both provided by the same provider, and can be provided by changing the underlying technology of the local access network from circuit-switched to packet-switched;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas for retail local access-independent VoIP services – in which access and service may be provided by distinct providers – the service provider is not required to provide the underlying network on which the service rides and is not required to obtain the permission of the network provider to offer the service to customers on that network;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that retail local access-dependent VoIP services are typically indistinguishable from traditional local telephone services, while retail local access-independent VoIP services are very different, as they require high-speed Internet access as well as special handsets, adapters or the use of a computer, and may be more susceptible to service deterioration or disruption;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that retail local access-independent VoIP services should thus be treated as a distinct class of local telephone services, for regulatory purposes;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Canadian telecommunications policy objectives set out in section 7 of the Act include enhancing the efficiency and competitiveness, at the national and international levels, of Canadian telecommunications, fostering increased reliance on market forces for the provision of telecommunications services, ensuring that regulation, where required, is efficient and effective, stimulating research and development in Canada in the field of telecommunications and encouraging innovation in the provision of telecommunications services;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that VoIP is a relatively new and rapidly evolving technology used to provide telephone services and that it is in the public interest to enable efficient and timely deployment of innovative new technologies by all telecommunications service providers;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that VoIP technology is increasingly being integrated into telecommunications networks and is a means of reducing costs and enabling innovative features, competition and the entry of smaller players in the local telephone market;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that barriers to market entry are much lower for retail local access-independent VoIP services as no provision of network facilities is required;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas retail local VoIP services provided by incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) within their incumbent territories are subject to economic regulation, while those provided by competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) are not subject to that type of regulation;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that it would be consistent with the Canadian telecommunications policy objectives to refrain from regulating the retail local access-independent class of VoIP services provided by the ILECs within their incumbent territories, at this time, since forbearance from economic regulation for those services would stimulate competition and innovation;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Whereas the Governor in Council considers that it is, however, important that those services remain subject to the regulatory framework imposed on VoIP services in section IV of the Decision;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
And, whereas, in accordance with section 13 of the Act, the Minister of Industry has notified the minister designated by the government of each province of the Minister’s intention to make his recommendation to the Governor in Council to vary the Decision and has provided an opportunity for each minister to consult with him;
Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 — Order Varying Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Therefore, Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Industry, pursuant to subsection 12(7) of the Telecommunications Act , varies Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, as amended by Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28-1 and as confirmed in Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53, so that, in relation to retail local access-independent VoIP services – being a particular class of services – provided by ILECs within their incumbent territories, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission refrain from exercising its powers and performing its duties under section 25, subsections 27(1), (5) and (6) and sections 29 and 31 of that Act to the same extent that it does in relation to retail local telecommunications services provided to end users by CLECs in Telecom Decision CRTC 97-8, Local Competition , and subsequent determinations. However, nothing in this Order prevents the Commission from exercising its powers and resuming regulation of retail local access-independent VoIP services provided by ILECs within their incumbent territories if, pursuant to subsection 34(3) of that Act, it finds, as a question of fact, that circumstances have changed so that to continue to refrain would be likely to impair unduly the establishment or continuance of a competitive market for the provision of those services. Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, as amended by Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28-1 and as confirmed in Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53, shall otherwise continue to apply, but to the extent that its provisions are inconsistent with this Order, they shall be interpreted so that the provisions of this Order prevail.
Virtual Elimination List — a
Whereas, pursuant to subsection 332(1) a of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 b , the Minister of the Environment published in the Canada Gazette , Part I, on August 16, 2003 a copy of the proposed Virtual Elimination List , substantially in the form set out in the annexed List, and persons were given an opportunity to file comments with respect to the proposed List or to file a notice of objection requesting that a board of review be established and stating the reasons for the objection; a S.C. 2004, c. 15, s. 31 b S.C. 1999, c. 33
Virtual Elimination List — Virtual Elimination List
Therefore, the Minister of the Environment and the Minister of Health, pursuant to subsection 65(2) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 b , hereby compile the annexed Virtual Elimination List , effective on the date on which it is registered. Ottawa, August 21, 2006 Rona Ambrose Minister of the Environment Ottawa, November 22, 2006 Tony Clement Minister of Health
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Finance, pursuant to subsections 271(1) a , (3) a and (6) a and 978(1) b of the Bank Act c , hereby makes the annexed Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations . a S.C. 2005, c. 54, s. 57 b S.C. 2005, c. 54, s. 135 c S.C. 1991, c. 46
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — 1
1 In these Regulations, Act means the Bank Act .
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — 2
2 For the purpose of paragraph 271(1)(d) of the Act, the prescribed percentage of voting rights attached to all of the bank’s or bank holding company’s outstanding shares is 10%.
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — 2.1
2.1 For the purpose of subsection 271(1.1) of the Act, the prescribed percentage of the membership shares of the federal credit union is 10%. SOR/2012-269, s. 16
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — 3
3 For the purpose of subsection 271(3) of the Act, take-over bid means a take-over bid under any legislation that is set out in column 2 of the schedule.
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — 4
4 For the purpose of paragraph 271(6)(c) of the Act, the prescribed circumstances are that the insider (a) entered into the purchase or sale of the security as an agent pursuant to a specific unsolicited order to purchase or sell; (b) made the purchase or sale of the security pursuant to participation in an automatic dividend reinvestment plan, share purchase plan or other similar automatic plan that the insider entered into before the acquisition of the confidential information; (c) made the purchase or sale of the security to fulfil a legally binding obligation that the insider entered into before the acquisition of the confidential information; or (d) purchased or sold the security as agent or trustee in the circumstances described in paragraph (b) or (c).
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — 5
5 These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in subsection 89(1) of the Securities Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in section 110 of the Securities Act , R.S.Q., c. V-1.1, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in paragraph 95(1)(l) of the Securities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 418, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in subsection 106(1) of the Securities Act , S.N.B. 2004, c. S-5.5, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in subsection 80(1) of The Securities Act , C.C.S.M., c. S50, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take over bid in subsection 92(1) of the Securities Act , R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 418, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in paragraph 98(1)(j) of The Securities Act, 1988 , S.S. 1988-89, c. S-42.2, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in paragraph 158(1)(r) of the Securities Act , R.S.A. 2000, c. S-4, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in paragraph 90(1)(l) of the Securities Act , R.S.N.L. 1990, c. S-13, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in section 196 of the Business Corporations Act , R.S.Y. 2002, c. 20, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in section 196 of the Business Corporations Act , S.N.W.T. 1996, c. 19, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in section 196 of the Business Corporations Act (Nunavut) , S.N.W.T. 1996, c. 19, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — a
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Finance, pursuant to subsections 266(1) a , (3) a and (6) a and 463(1) b of the Cooperative Credit Associations Act c , hereby makes the annexed Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations . a S.C. 2005, c. 54, s. 194 b S.C. 2005, c. 54, s. 208 c S.C. 1991, c. 48
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — 1
1 In these Regulations, Act means the Cooperative Credit Associations Act .
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — 2
2 For the purpose of paragraph 266(1)(f) of the Act, the prescribed percentage of voting rights attached to all of the cooperative credit association’s outstanding shares is 10%.
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — 3
3 For the purpose of subsection 266(3) of the Act, take-over bid means a take-over bid under any legislation that is set out in column 2 of the schedule.
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — 4
4 For the purpose of paragraph 266(6)(c) of the Act, the prescribed circumstances are that the insider (a) entered into the purchase or sale of the security as an agent pursuant to a specific unsolicited order to purchase or sell; (b) made the purchase or sale of the security pursuant to participation in an automatic dividend reinvestment plan, share purchase plan or other similar automatic plan that the insider entered into before the acquisition of the confidential information; (c) made the purchase or sale of the security to fulfil a legally binding obligation that the insider entered into before the acquisition of the confidential information; or (d) purchased or sold the security as agent or trustee in the circumstances described in paragraph (b) or (c).
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — 5
5 These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in subsection 89(1) of the Securities Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in section 110 of the Securities Act , R.S.Q., c. V-1.1, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in paragraph 95(1)(l) of the Securities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 418, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in subsection 106(1) of the Securities Act , S.N.B. 2004, c. S-5.5, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations
the definition take-over bid in subsection 80(1) of the Securities Act , C.C.S.M., c. S50, as amended from time to time
Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations — Civil Remedies (Cooperative Credit Associations) Regulations
the definition take over bid in subsection 92(1) of the Securities Act , R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 418, as amended from time to time