GenAI4ELab/papercli-papers huggingface dataset:
FaST: Feature-aware Sampling and Tuning for Personalized Preference Alignment with Limited Data
Authors: Thibaut Thonet; Germán Kruszewski; Jos Rozen; Pierre Erbacher; Marc Dymetman
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: LLM-powered conversational assistants are often deployed in a one-size-fits-all manner, which fails to accommodate individual user preferences. Recently, LLM personalization – tailoring models to align with specific user preferences – has gained increasing attention as a way to bridge this gap. In this work, we specifically focus on a practical yet challenging setting where only a small set of preference annotations can be collected per user – a problem we define as Personalized Preference Alignment with Limited Data (PPALLI). To support research in this area, we introduce two datasets – DnD and ELIP – and benchmark a variety of alignment techniques on them. We further propose FaST, a highly parameter-efficient approach that leverages high-level features automatically discovered from the data, achieving the best overall performance.
On LLM-Based Scientific Inductive Reasoning Beyond Equations
Authors: Brian S. Lin; Jiaxin Yuan; Zihan Zhou; Shouli Wang; Shuo Wang; Cunliang Kong; Qi Shi; Yuxuan Li; Liner Yang; Zhiyuan Liu; Maosong Sun
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) increasingly exhibit human-like capabilities, a fundamental question emerges: How can we enable LLMs to learn the underlying patterns from limited examples in entirely novel environments and apply them effectively? This question is central to the ability of LLMs in inductive reasoning. Existing research on LLM-based inductive reasoning can be broadly categorized based on whether the underlying rules are expressible via explicit mathematical equations. However, many recent studies in the beyond-equations category have emphasized rule design without grounding them in specific scenarios. Inspired by the parallels between inductive reasoning and human scientific discovery, we propose the task of LLM-Based Scientific Inductive Reasoning Beyond Equations and introduce a new benchmark, SIRBench-V1, to evaluate the inductive reasoning abilities of LLMs in scientific settings. Our experimental results show that current LLMs still struggle with this task, underscoring its difficulty and the need for further advancement in this area.
SPECS: Specificity-Enhanced CLIP-Score for Long Image Caption Evaluation
Authors: Xiaofu Chen; Israfel Salazar; Yova Kementchedjhieva
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: As interest grows in generating long, detailed image captions, standard evaluation metrics become increasingly unreliable. N-gram-based metrics though efficient, fail to capture semantic correctness. Representational Similarity (RS) metrics, designed to address this, initially saw limited use due to high computational costs, while today, despite advances in hardware, they remain unpopular due to low correlation to human judgments. Meanwhile, metrics based on large language models (LLMs) show strong correlation with human judgments, but remain too expensive for iterative use during model development.We introduce SPECS (Specificity-Enhanced CLIPScore), a reference-free RS metric tailored to long image captioning. SPECS modifies CLIP with a new objective that emphasizes specificity: rewarding correct details and penalizing incorrect ones. We show that SPECS matches the performance of open-source LLM-based metrics in correlation to human judgments, while being far more efficient. This makes it a practical alternative for iterative checkpoint evaluation during image captioning model development.Our code can be found at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/SPECS.
LM-Searcher: Cross-domain Neural Architecture Search with LLMs via Unified Numerical Encoding
Authors: Yuxuan Hu; Jihao Liu; Ke Wang; Jinliang Zheng; Weikang Shi; Manyuan Zhang; Qi Dou; Rui Liu; Aojun Zhou; Hongsheng Li
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Recent progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for solving complex optimization problems, including Neural Architecture Search (NAS). However, existing LLM-driven NAS approaches rely heavily on prompt engineering and domain-specific tuning, limiting their practicality and scalability across diverse tasks. In this work, we propose LM-Searcher, a novel framework that leverages LLMs for cross-domain neural architecture optimization without the need for extensive domain-specific adaptation. Central to our approach is NCode, a universal numerical string representation for neural architectures, which enables cross-domain architecture encoding and search. We also reformulate the NAS problem as a ranking task, training LLMs to select high-performing architectures from candidate pools using instruction-tuning samples derived from a novel pruning-based subspace sampling strategy. Our curated dataset, encompassing a wide range of architecture-performance pairs, encourages robust and transferable learning. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that LM-Searcher achieves competitive performance in both in-domain (e.g., CNNs for image classification) and out-of-domain (e.g., LoRA configurations for segmentation and generation) tasks, establishing a new paradigm for flexible and generalizable LLM-based architecture search.
Does quantization affect models’ performance on long-context tasks?
Authors: Anmol Mekala; Anirudh Atmakuru; Yixiao Song; Marzena Karpinska; Mohit Iyyer
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) now support context windows exceeding 128K tokens, but this comes with significant memory requirements and high inference latency. Quantization can mitigate these costs, but may degrade performance. In this work, we present the first systematic evaluation of quantized LLMs on tasks with long inputs (≥64K tokens) and long-form outputs. Our evaluation spans 9.7K test examples, five quantization methods (FP8, GPTQ-int8, AWQ-int4, GPTQ-int4, BNB-nf4), and five models (Llama-3.1 8B and 70B; Qwen-2.5 7B, 32B, and 72B). We find that, on average, 8-bit quantization preserves accuracy (~0.8% drop), whereas 4-bit methods lead to substantial losses, especially for tasks involving long-context inputs (drops of up to 59%). This degradation tends to worsen when the input is in a language other than English. Crucially, the effects of quantization depend heavily on the quantization method, model, and task. For instance, while Qwen-2.5 72B remains robust under BNB-nf4, Llama-3.1 70B experiences a 32% performance drop on the same task. These findings highlight the importance of a careful, task-specific evaluation before deploying quantized LLMs, particularly in long-context scenarios and for languages other than English.
Token-Aware Editing of Internal Activations for Large Language Model Alignment
Authors: Tianbo Wang; Yuqing Ma; Kewei Liao; Chengzhao Yang; Zhange Zhang; Jiakai Wang; Xianglong Liu
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Intervening the internal activations of large language models (LLMs) provides an effective inference-time alignment approach to mitigate undesirable behaviors, such as generating erroneous or harmful content, thereby ensuring safe and reliable applications of LLMs. However, previous methods neglect the misalignment discrepancy among varied tokens, resulting in deviant alignment direction and inflexible editing strength. To address these issues, we propose a token-aware editing (TAE) approach to fully utilize token-level alignment information in the activation space, therefore realizing superior post-intervention performance. Specifically, a Mutual Information-guided Graph Aggregation (MIG) module first develops an MI-guided graph to exploit the tokens’ informative interaction for activation enrichment, thus improving alignment probing and facilitating intervention. Subsequently, Misalignment-aware Adaptive Intervention (MAI) comprehensively perceives the token-level misalignment degree from token representation and prediction to guide the adaptive adjustment of editing strength, thereby enhancing final alignment performance. Extensive experiments on three alignment capabilities demonstrate the efficacy of TAE, notably surpassing baseline by 25.8% on the primary metric of truthfulness with minimal cost.
Bitune: Leveraging Bidirectional Attention to Improve Decoder-Only LLMs
Authors: Dawid Jan Kopiczko; Tijmen Blankevoort; Yuki M Asano
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Decoder-only large language models typically rely solely on masked causal attention, which limits their expressiveness by restricting information flow to one direction. We propose Bitune, a method that enhances pretrained decoder-only LLMs by incorporating bidirectional attention into prompt processing. We evaluate Bitune in instruction-tuning and question-answering settings, showing significant improvements in performance on commonsense reasoning, arithmetic, and language understanding tasks. Furthermore, extensive ablation studies validate the role of each component of the method, and demonstrate that Bitune is compatible with various parameter-efficient finetuning techniques and full model finetuning.
Disambiguation in Conversational Question Answering in the Era of LLMs and Agents: A Survey
Authors: Mehrab Tanjim; Yeonjun In; Xiang Chen; Victor Bursztyn; Ryan A. Rossi; Sungchul Kim; Guang-Jie Ren; Vaishnavi Muppala; Shun Jiang; Yongsung Kim; Chanyoung Park
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Ambiguity remains a fundamental challenge in Natural Language Processing (NLP) due to the inherent complexity and flexibility of human language. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), addressing ambiguity has become even more critical due to their expanded capabilities and applications. In the context of Conversational Question Answering (CQA), this paper explores the definition, forms, and implications of ambiguity for language driven systems, particularly in the context of LLMs. We define key terms and concepts, categorize various disambiguation approaches enabled by LLMs, and provide a comparative analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. We also explore publicly available datasets for benchmarking ambiguity detection and resolution techniques and highlight their relevance for ongoing research. Finally, we identify open problems and future research directions, especially in agentic settings, proposing areas for further investigation. By offering a comprehensive review of current research on ambiguities and disambiguation with LLMs, we aim to contribute to the development of more robust and reliable LLM-based systems.
Plan Dynamically, Express Rhetorically: A Debate-Driven Rhetorical Framework for Argumentative Writing
Authors: Xueguan Zhao; Wenpeng Lu; Chaoqun Zheng; Weiyu Zhang; Jiasheng Si; Deyu Zhou
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Argumentative essay generation (AEG) is a complex task that requires advanced semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and organized integration of perspectives. Despite showing a promising performance, current efforts often overlook the dynamical and hierarchical nature of structural argumentative planning, and struggle with flexible rhetorical expression, leading to limited argument divergence and rhetorical optimization. Inspired by human debate behavior and Bitzer’s rhetorical situation theory, we propose a debate-driven rhetorical framework for argumentative writing. The uniqueness lies in three aspects: (1) dynamic assesses the divergence of viewpoints and progressively reveals the hierarchical outline of arguments based on a depth-then-breadth paradigm, improving the perspective divergence within argumentation; (2) simulates human debate through iterative defender-attacker interactions, improving the logical coherence of arguments; (3) incorporates Bitzer’s rhetorical situation theory to flexibly select appropriate rhetorical techniques, enabling the rhetorical expression. Experiments on four benchmarks validate that our approach significantly improves logical depth, argumentative diversity, and rhetorical persuasiveness over existing state-of-the-art models.
TCPO: Thought-Centric Preference Optimization for Effective Embodied Decision-making
Authors: Kechen Jiao; Zhirui Fang; Jiahao Liu; Bei Li; Qifan Wang; Xinyu Liu; Junhao Ruan; Zhongjian Qiao; Yifan Zhu; Yaxin Xu; Jingang Wang; Xiu Li
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Using effective generalization capabilities of vision language models (VLMs) in context-specific dynamic tasks for embodied artificial intelligence remains a significant challenge. Although supervised fine-tuned models can better align with the real physical world, they still exhibit sluggish responses and hallucination issues in dynamically changing environments, necessitating further alignment. Existing post-SFT methods, reliant on reinforcement learning and chain-of-thought (CoT) approaches, are constrained by sparse rewards and action-only optimization, resulting in low sample efficiency, poor consistency, and model degradation. To address these issues, this paper proposes Thought-Centric Preference Optimization (TCPO) for effective embodied decision-making. Specifically, TCPO introduces a stepwise preference-based optimization approach, transforming sparse reward signals into richer step sample pairs. It emphasizes the alignment of the model’s intermediate reasoning process, mitigating the problem of model degradation. Moreover, by incorporating Action Policy Consistency Constraint (APC), it further imposes consistency constraints on the model output. Experiments in the ALFWorld environment demonstrate an average success rate of **26.67%**, achieving a **6%** improvement over RL4VLM and validating the effectiveness of our approach in mitigating model degradation after fine-tuning. These results highlight the potential of integrating preference-based learning techniques with CoT processes to enhance the decision-making capabilities of vision-language models in embodied agents.
Reimagining Safety Alignment with An Image
Authors: Yifan Xia; Guorui Chen; Wenqian Yu; Zhijiang Li; Philip Torr; Jindong Gu
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel in diverse applications but face dual challenges: generating harmful content under jailbreak attacks and over-refusing benign queries due to rigid safety mechanisms. These issues severely affect the application of LLMs, especially in the medical and education fields. Existing approaches can be divided into three types: contrastive decoding, activation manipulation, and prompting strategies. However, all these approaches face challenges like inefficiency, fragility, or architectural constraints,ultimately failing to strike a balance between safety and usability. These problems are more obvious in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), especially in terms of heightened over-refusal in cross-modal tasks and new security risks arising from expanded attack surfaces. We propose Magic Image, an optimization-driven visual prompt framework that enhances security and reduces over-refusal at the same time. The Magic Image is optimized using gradients derived from harmful/benign training samples. Using the magic image can modify the model’s original safety alignment, maintaining robust safety while reducing unnecessary denials. Experiments demonstrate its effectiveness in preserving model performance and improving safety-responsiveness balance across datasets, including unseen data, offering a practical solution for reliable MLLM deployment.
Generative or Discriminative? Revisiting Text Classification in the Era of Transformers
Authors: Siva Rajesh Kasa; Karan Gupta; Sumegh Roychowdhury; Ashutosh Kumar; Yaswanth Biruduraju; Santhosh Kumar Kasa; Pattisapu Nikhil Priyatam; Arindam Bhattacharya; Shailendra Agarwal; Vijay Huddar
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: *The comparison between discriminative and generative classifiers has intrigued researchers since [Efron (1975)’s](https://www.jstor.org/stable/2285453) seminal analysis of logistic regression versus discriminant analysis. While early theoretical work established that generative classifiers exhibit lower sample complexity but higher asymptotic error in simple linear settings, these trade-offs remain unexplored in the transformer era. We present the first comprehensive evaluation of modern generative and discriminative architectures—Auto-regressive, Masked Language Modeling, Discrete Diffusion, and Encoders for text classification. Our study reveals that the classical “two regimes” phenomenon manifests distinctly across different architectures and training paradigms. Beyond accuracy, we analyze sample efficiency, calibration, noise robustness, and ordinality across diverse scenarios. Our findings offer practical guidance for selecting the most suitable modeling approach based on real-world constraints such as latency and data limitations.*
Visual Contextual Attack: Jailbreaking MLLMs with Image-Driven Context Injection
Authors: Miao Ziqi; Yi Ding; Lijun Li; Jing Shao
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: With the emergence of strong vision language capabilities, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated tremendous potential for real-world applications. However, the security vulnerabilities exhibited by the visual modality pose significant challenges to deploying such models in open-world environments.Recent studies have successfully induced harmful responses from target MLLMs by encoding harmful textual semantics directly into visual inputs. However, in these approaches, the visual modality primarily serves as a trigger for unsafe behavior, often exhibiting semantic ambiguity and lacking grounding in realistic scenarios. In this work, we define a novel setting: vision-centric jailbreak, where visual information serves as a necessary component in constructing a complete and realistic jailbreak context. Building on this setting, we propose the VisCo (Visual Contextual) Attack.VisCo fabricates contextual dialogue using four distinct vision-focused strategies, dynamically generating auxiliary images when necessary to construct a vision-centric jailbreak scenario.To maximize attack effectiveness, it incorporates automatic toxicity obfuscation and semantic refinement to produce a final attack prompt that reliably triggers harmful responses from the target black-box MLLMs. Specifically, VisCo achieves a toxicity score of 4.78 and an Attack Success Rate (ASR) of 85% on MM-SafetyBench against GPT-4o, significantly outperforming the baseline, which achieves a toxicity score of 2.48 and an ASR of 22.2%. Code: https://github.com/Dtc7w3PQ/Visco-Attack.
Can Large Language Models Win the International Mathematical Games?
Authors: Alessio Cocchieri; Luca Ragazzi; Giuseppe Tagliavini; Lorenzo Tordi; Antonella Carbonaro; Gianluca Moro
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong mathematical reasoning abilities, even in visual contexts, with some models surpassing human performance on existing benchmarks. However, these benchmarks lack structured age categorization, clearly defined skill requirements, and—crucially—were not designed to assess human performance in international competitions. To address these limitations, we introduce MathGames, a new benchmark of 2,183 high-quality mathematical problems (both text-only and multimodal) in an open-ended format, sourced from an international mathematical games championships. Spanning seven age groups and a skill-based taxonomy, MathGames enables a structured evaluation of LLMs’ mathematical and logical reasoning abilities. Our experiments reveal a substantial gap between state-of-the-art LLMs and human participants—even 11-year-olds consistently outperform some of the strongest models—highlighting the need for advancements. Further, our detailed error analysis offers valuable insights to guide future research. The data is publicly available at https://disi-unibo-nlp.github.io/math-games.
CodeArena: Evaluating and Aligning CodeLLMs on Human Preference
Authors: Jian Yang; Jiaxi Yang; Wei Zhang; Jin Ke; Yibo Miao; Lei Zhang; Liqun Yang; Zeyu Cui; Yichang Zhang; Zhoujun Li; Binyuan Hui; Junyang Lin
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: We present CodeArena to emulate the complexity/diversity of real-world coding tasks, spanning 40 categories and 44 PLs. A 20B diverse synthetic instruction corpus is created by scaling instructions to help Qwen2.5-SynCoder achieve SOTA performance. Abstract: Code large language models (codeLLMs) have made significant strides in code generation. Most previous code-related benchmarks, which consist of various programming exercises along with the corresponding test cases, are used as a common measure to evaluate the performance and capabilities of code LLMs. However, the current code LLMs focus on synthesizing the correct code snippet, ignoring the alignment with human preferences, where the query should be sampled from the practical application scenarios and the model-generated responses should satisfy the human preference. To bridge the gap between the model-generated response and human preference, we present a rigorous human-curated benchmark CodeArena to emulate the complexity and diversity of real-world coding tasks, where 397 high-quality samples spanning 40 categories and 44 programming languages, carefully curated from user queries. Further, we propose a diverse synthetic instruction corpus SynCode-Instruct (nearly 20B tokens) by scaling instructions from the website to verify the effectiveness of the large-scale synthetic instruction fine-tuning, where Qwen2.5-SynCoder totally trained on synthetic instruction data can achieve top-tier performance of open-source code LLMs. The results find performance differences between execution-based benchmarks and CodeArena. Our systematic experiments of CodeArena on 40+ LLMs reveal a notable performance gap between open SOTA code LLMs (e.g. Qwen2.5-Coder) and proprietary LLMs (e.g., OpenAI o1), underscoring the importance of the human preference alignment.
Language models can learn implicit multi-hop reasoning, but only if they have lots of training data
Authors: Yuekun Yao; Yupei Du; Dawei Zhu; Michael Hahn; Alexander Koller
Venue: EMNLP 2025 (Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: Implicit reasoning is the ability of a language model to solve multi-hop reasoning tasks in a single forward pass, without chain of thought.We investigate this capability using GPT2-style language models trained from scratch on controlled k-hop reasoning datasets (k = 2, 3, 4). We show that while such models can indeed learn implicit k-hop reasoning,the required training data grows exponentially in k, and the requirednumber of transformer layers grows linearly in k.We offer a theoretical explanation for why this depth growth is necessary.We further find that the data requirement can be mitigated, but not eliminated,through curriculum learning.