GenAI4ELab/papercli-papers huggingface dataset:
D2MoRA: Diversity-Regulated Asymmetric MoE-LoRA Decomposition for Efficient Multi-Task Adaptation
Authors: Jianhui Zuo; Xuemeng Song; Haokun Wen; Meng Liu; Yupeng Hu; Jiuru Wang; Liqiang Nie
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a powerful parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for adapting large language models to downstream tasks. Recent studies have leveraged Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) mechanism to effectively integrate multiple LoRA modules, facilitating efficient parameter adaptation for multi-task scenarios.  It has been shown that fostering knowledge sharing across LoRA experts can greatly enhance parameter adaptation efficiency. However, the existing approach for LoRA expert knowledge sharing still faces two key limitations: constrained functional specialization and induced expert homogenization. To address these issues, we propose a novel diversity-regulated asymmetric MoE-LoRA decomposition framework, which achieves flexible knowledge sharing through asymmetric expert decomposition and guarantees expert diversity with a dual orthogonality regularization. Extensive experiments on eight public benchmarks, spanning both multi-task and single-task settings, demonstrate the superiority of our approach over existing methods.
Local Guidance for Configuration-Based Multi-Agent Pathfinding
Authors: Tomoki Arita; Keisuke Okumura
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Guidance is an emerging concept that improves the empirical performance of real-time, sub-optimal multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) methods. It offers additional information to MAPF algorithms to mitigate congestion on a global scale by considering the collective behavior of all agents across the entire workspace. This global perspective helps reduce agents' waiting times, thereby improving overall coordination efficiency. In contrast, this study explores an alternative approach: providing local guidance in the vicinity of each agent. While such localized methods involve recomputation as agents move and may appear computationally demanding, we empirically demonstrate that supplying informative spatiotemporal cues to the planner can significantly improve solution quality without exceeding a moderate time budget. When applied to LaCAM, a leading configuration-based solver, this form of guidance establishes a new performance frontier for MAPF.
When Natural Strategies Meet Fuzziness and Resource-Bounded Actions
Authors: Marco Aruta; Francesco Improta; Vadim Malvone; Aniello Murano
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: In formal strategic reasoning for Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), agents are typically assumed to (i) employ arbitrarily complex strategies, (ii) execute each move at zero cost, and (iii) operate over fully crisp game structures. These idealized assumptions stand in stark contrast with human decision-making in real-world environments. The natural strategies framework, along with some of its recent variants, partially addresses this gap by restricting strategies to concise rules guarded by regular expressions. Yet, it still overlook both the cost of each action and the uncertainty that often characterizes human perception of facts over the time. In this work, we introduce HumanATLF, a logic that builds upon natural strategies employing both fuzzy semantics and resource‐bound actions: each action carries a real-valued cost drawn from a non‐refillable budget, and atomic conditions and goals have degrees in [0,1]. We give a formal syntax and semantics, and prove that model checking is in P when both the strategy complexity k and resource budget b are fixed, NP-complete if just one strategic operator over Boolean objectives is allowed, and Delta^P_2‐complete when k and b vary. Moreover, we show that recall‐based strategies can be decided in PSPACE. We implement our algorithms in VITAMIN, an open source model-checking tool for MAS and validate them on an adversarial resource-aware drone rescue scenario.
Efficient Multiagent Planning via Shared Action Suggestions
Authors: Dylan M. Asmar; Mykel J. Kochenderfer
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes with communication (Dec-POMDP-Com) provide a framework for multiagent decision making under uncertainty, but the NEXP-complete complexity for finite-horizon problems renders solutions intractable in general. While sharing actions and observations can reduce the complexity to PSPACE-complete, we propose an approach that bridges POMDPs and Dec-POMDPs by communicating only suggested joint actions, eliminating the need to share observations while retaining near-centralized performance. Our algorithm estimates joint beliefs using shared actions to prune infeasible beliefs. Each agent maintains possible belief sets for other agents, pruning them based on suggested actions to form an estimated joint belief usable with any centralized policy. This approach requires solving a POMDP for each agent, reducing computational complexity while preserving performance. We demonstrate its effectiveness on several Dec-POMDP benchmarks, showing performance comparable to centralized methods when shared actions enable effective belief pruning. This action-based communication framework offers a natural avenue for integrating human-agent cooperation, opening new directions for scalable multiagent planning under uncertainty, with applications in both autonomous systems and human-agent teams.
A Phase Transition for Opinion Dynamics with Competing Biases
Authors: Federico Capannoli; Emilio Cruciani; Hlafo Alfie Mimun; Matteo Quattropani
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: We study the nonlinear evolution of binary opinions in a population of agents connected by a directed network, influenced by two competing forces. 
On the one hand agents are stubborn, i.e., have a tendency for one of the two opinions; on the other hand there is a disruptive bias that drives the agents toward the opposite opinion.
The disruptive bias models external factors such as market innovations or social controllers aiming to challenge the status quo, while stubbornness reinforces the initial opinion making it harder for the external bias to drive the process toward change.
Each agent updates its opinion according to a nonlinear rule that takes into account the opinions of its neighbors and the strength of the disruptive bias. 
We focus on random directed graphs with prescribed in- and out-degree sequences and prove that the dynamics exhibits a phase transition. 
When the disruptive bias is stronger than a certain critical threshold, the entire population rapidly converges to a consensus on the disruptive opinion. When the bias is weaker than this threshold, the system enters a metastable state in which only a fraction of the population adopts the new opinion, and this partial adoption persists for a long time.
We explicitly characterize both the critical threshold and the long-term adoption fraction, showing that they depend only on few simple statistics of the degree sequences. 
Our analysis relies on a dual system of coalescing, branching, and dying particles, whose behavior is equivalent and allows a rigorous characterization of the system's dynamics.
Our results characterize the interplay between the degree of the agents, their stubbornness, and the external bias, shedding light on the tipping points of opinion dynamics in networks.
Mental Model-based Generation of Lies for Insider Threat Modeling
Authors: Brittany Cates; Sarath Sreedharan
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: It is well understood that mental modeling forms the foundation of many everyday interactions between humans. This includes both collaborative and deceptive interactions. One could argue that the modeling and manipulation of mental states lies at the heart of effective deception. In this paper, we examine the security problem of insider threat attacks. In this case, an adversary has already infiltrated an organization. The primary challenge for this attacker is to avoid suspicion until their true goal can be achieved. We see how existing model-based explanatory methods can be leveraged to generate lies that explain away potentially suspicious activities. We also propose a novel planning formulation which generates plans that appear to achieve an assigned goal while getting close enough to reach an alternative, covert goal. We evaluate our method through computational experiments and a user study.
G-UBS: Towards Robust Understanding of Implicit Feedback via Group-Aware User Behavior Simulation
Authors: Boyu Chen; Siran Chen; Zhengrong Yue; Kainan Yan; Chenyun Yu; Beibei Kong; Lei Cheng; Chengxiang Zhuo; Zang Li; Yali Wang
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: User feedback is critical for refining recommendation systems, yet explicit feedback (e.g., likes or dislikes) remains scarce in practice. As a more feasible alternative, inferring user preferences from massive implicit feedback has shown great potential (e.g., a user quickly skipping a recommended video usually indicates disinterest). Unfortunately, implicit feedback is often noisy: a user might skip a video due to accidental clicks or other reasons, rather than disliking it. Such noise can easily misjudge user interests, thereby undermining recommendation performance.
To address this issue, we propose a novel Group-aware User Behavior Simulation (G-UBS) paradigm, which leverages contextual guidance from relevant user groups, enabling robust and in-depth interpretation of implicit feedback for individual users.
Specifically, G-UBS operates via two key agents. First, the User Group Manager (UGM) effectively clusters users to generate group profiles utilizing a ``summarize-cluster-reflect" workflow based on LLMs. Second, the User Feedback Modeler (UFM) employs an innovative group-aware reinforcement learning approach, where each user is guided by the associated group profiles during the reinforcement learning process, allowing UFM to robustly and deeply examine the reasons behind implicit feedback. 
To assess our G-UBS paradigm, we have constructed a Video Recommendation benchmark with Implicit Feedback (IF-VR).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multi-modal benchmark for implicit feedback evaluation in video recommendation,
encompassing 15k users, 25k videos, and 933k interaction records with implicit feedback.
Extensive experiments on IF-VR demonstrate that G-UBS significantly outperforms mainstream LLMs and MLLMs, with a 4.0% higher proportion of videos achieving a play rate > 30% and 14.9% higher reasoning accuracy on IF-VR.
GUI-Eyes: Tool-Augmented Perception for Visual Grounding in GUI Agents
Authors: Chen Chen; Jiawei Shao; Dakuan Lu; Haoyi Hu; Xiangcheng Liu; Hantao Yao; Wu Liu
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) and reinforcement learning (RL) have driven progress in GUI automation. However, most existing methods rely on static, one-shot visual inputs and passive perception, lacking the ability to adaptively determine when, whether, and how to observe the interface. We present GUI-Eyes, a reinforcement learning framework for active visual perception in GUI tasks. To acquire more informative observations, the agent learns to make strategic decisions on both whether and how to invoke visual tools, such as cropping or zooming, within a two-stage reasoning process. To support this behavior, we introduce a progressive perception strategy that decomposes the decision-making into coarse exploration and fine-grained grounding, coordinated by a two-level policy. In addition, we design a spatially continuous reward function tailored to tool usage, which integrates both location proximity and region overlap to provide dense supervision and alleviate the reward sparsity common in GUI environments. On the ScreenSpot-Pro benchmark, GUI-Eyes-3B achieves 44.8% grounding accuracy using only 3k labeled samples, significantly outperforming both supervised and RL-based baselines. These results highlight that tool-aware active perception, enabled by staged policy reasoning and fine-grained reward feedback, is critical for building robust and data-efficient GUI agents.
Adversarial Attack on Black-Box Multi-Agent by Adaptive Perturbation
Authors: Jianming Chen; Yawen Wang; Junjie Wang; Xiaofei Xie; Yuanzhe Hu; Qing Wang; Fanjiang Xu
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Evaluating security and reliability for multi-agent systems (MAS) is urgent as they become increasingly prevalent in various applications. As an evaluation technique, existing adversarial attack frameworks face certain limitations, e.g., impracticality due to the requirement of white-box information or high control authority, and a lack of stealthiness or effectiveness as they often target all agents or specific fixed agents. To address these issues, we propose AdapAM, a novel framework for adversarial attacks on black-box MAS. AdapAM incorporates two key components: (1) Adaptive Selection Policy simultaneously selects the victim and determines the anticipated malicious action (the action would lead to the worst impact on MAS), balancing effectiveness and stealthiness. (2) Proxy-based Perturbation to Induce Malicious Action utilizes generative adversarial imitation learning to approximate the target MAS, allowing AdapAM to generate perturbed observations using white-box information and thus induce victims to execute malicious action in black-box settings. We evaluate AdapAM across eight multi-agent environments and compare it with four state-of-the-art and commonly-used baselines. Results demonstrate that AdapAM achieves the best attack performance in different perturbation rates. Besides, AdapAM-generated perturbations are the least noisy and hardest to detect, emphasizing the stealthiness.
Simulating Dispute Mediation with LLM-Based Agents for Legal Research
Authors: Junjie Chen; Haitao Li; Minghao Qin; Yujia Zhou; Yanxue Ren; Wuyue Wang; Yiqun Liu; Yueyue Wu; Qingyao Ai
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Legal dispute mediation plays a crucial role in resolving civil disputes, yet its empirical study is limited by privacy constraints and complex multivariate interactions. To address this limitation, we present AgentMediation, the first LLM-based agent framework for simulating dispute mediation. It simulates realistic mediation processes grounded in real-world disputes and enables controlled experimentation on key variables such as disputant strategies, dispute causes, and mediator expertise. Our empirical analysis reveals patterns consistent with sociological theories, including Group Polarization and Surface-level Consensus. As a comprehensive and extensible platform, AgentMediation paves the way for deeper integration of social science and AI in legal research.
ZeRCP: Towards Communication-Efficient Collaborative Perception and Future Scene Prediction via Request-Free Spatial Filtering
Authors: Yijie Chen; Yuzhe Ji; Haotian Wang; Xiaoyun Qiu; Ying-Cong Chen; Xinhu Zheng
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Multi-Agent collaboration addresses inherent limitations of individual agent systems, including limited sensing range and occlusion-induced blind spots. Despite significant progress, persistent challenges such as constrained communication bandwidth and under-explored subsequent extensions still hinder real-time deployment and further developments of collaborative autonomous driving systems. In this work, we propose ZeRCP, a unified communication-efficient framework that bridges collaborative perception with future scene prediction. Specifically, (i) we devise a plug-and-play request-free spatial filtering module (ZeroR) that eliminates the reliance on request maps while preserving inter-agent spatial complementarity modeling. This approach further reduce communication latency and bandwidth consumptions. (ii) We design a multi-scale pyramidal prediction network anchored by a novel Spatial-Temporal Deformable Attention (STDA) module, extending frame-wise detection to multi-frame predictions. This method adeptly models spatiotemporal dynamics without relying on auto-regressive recursion. We evaluate our method on a large-scale dataset in challenging semantic segmentation and scene prediction tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority and effectiveness of ZeRCP in bandwidth-constrained collaboration scenarios and spatiotemporal prediction applications.
GDBA Revisited: Unleashing the Power of Guided Local Search for Distributed Constraint Optimization
Authors: Yanchen Deng; Xinrun Wang; Bo An
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Local search is an important class of incomplete algorithms for solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) but it often converges to poor local optima. While Generalized Distributed Breakout Algorithm (GDBA) provides a comprehensive rule set to escape premature convergence, its empirical benefits remain marginal on general-valued problems. In this work, we systematically examine GDBA and identify three factors that potentially lead to its inferior performance, i.e., over-aggressive constraint violation conditions, unbounded penalty accumulation, and uncoordinated penalty updates. To address these issues, we propose Distributed Guided Local Search (DGLS), a novel GLS framework for DCOPs that incorporates an adaptive violation condition to selectively penalize constraints with high cost, a penalty evaporation mechanism to control the magnitude of penalization, and a synchronization scheme for coordinated penalty updates. We theoretically show that the penalty values are bounded, and agents play a potential game in DGLS. Extensive empirical results on various benchmarks demonstrate the great superiority of DGLS over state-of-the-art baselines. Compared to Damped Max-sum with high damping factors, our DGLS achieves competitive performance on general-valued problems, and outperforms by significant margins on structured problems in terms of anytime results.
S-DAG: A Subject-Based Directed Acyclic Graph for Multi-Agent Heterogeneous Reasoning
Authors: Jiangwen Dong; Zehui Lin; Wanyu Lin; Mingjin Zhang
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance in complex reasoning problems. Their effectiveness highly depends on the specific nature of the task, especially the required domain knowledge. Existing approaches, such as mixture-of-experts, typically operate at the task level; they are too coarse to effectively solve the heterogeneous problems involving multiple subjects. This work proposes a novel framework that performs fine-grained analysis at subject level equipped with a designated multi-agent collaboration strategy for addressing heterogeneous problem reasoning. Specifically, given an input query, we first employ a Graph Neural Network to identify the relevant subjects and infer their interdependencies to generate an Subject-based Directed Acyclic Graph (S-DAG), where nodes represent subjects and edges encode information flow. Then we profile the LLM models by assigning each model a subject-specific expertise score, and select the top-performing one for matching corresponding subject of the S-DAG. Such subject-model matching enables graph-structured multi-agent collaboration where information flows from the starting model to the ending model over S-DAG. We curate and release multi-subject subsets of standard benchmarks (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, MedMCQA) to better reflect complex, real-world reasoning tasks. Extensive experiments show that our approach significantly outperforms existing task-level model selection and multi-agent collaboration baselines in accuracy and efficiency. These results highlight the effectiveness of subject-aware reasoning and structured collaboration in addressing complex and multi-subject problems.
iMAD: Intelligent Multi-Agent Debate for Efficient and Accurate LLM Inference
Authors: Wei Fan; JinYi Yoon; Bo Ji
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agent systems have advanced rapidly, driven by their strong generalization in zero-shot settings. To further enhance reasoning and accuracy on complex tasks, Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) has emerged as a promising framework that engages multiple LLM agents in structured debates to encourage diverse reasoning. However, triggering MAD for every query is inefficient, as it incurs substantial computational (token) cost and may even degrade accuracy by overturning correct answers from single-agent. To address these limitations, we propose intelligent Multi-Agent Debate (iMAD), a token-efficient framework that selectively triggers MAD only when it is likely to be beneficial
(i.e., correcting an initially wrong answer). To achieve this goal, iMAD learns generalizable model behaviors to make accurate debate decisions. Specifically, iMAD first prompts a single agent to produce a structured self-critique response, from which we extract 41 interpretable linguistic and semantic features capturing hesitation cues. Then, iMAD uses a lightweight debate decision classifier, trained using our proposed FocusCal loss without test-dataset-specific tuning, to make robust zero-shot debate decisions. Through extensive experiments using six (visual) question answering datasets against five competitive baselines, we show that iMAD significantly reduces token usage (by up to 92%) while also improving final answer accuracy (by up to 13.5%).
Cost-Effective Communication: An Auction-based Method for Language Agent Interaction
Authors: Yijia Fan; Jusheng Zhang; Kaitong Cai; Jing Yang; Chengpei Tang; Jian Wang; Keze Wang
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: Multi-agent systems (MAS) built on large language models (LLMs) often suffer from inefficient ''free-for-all'' communication, leading to exponential token costs and low signal-to-noise ratios that hinder their practical deployment. We challenge the notion that more communication is always beneficial, hypothesizing instead that the core issue is the absence of resource rationality. We argue that "free'' communication, by ignoring the principle of scarcity, inherently breeds inefficiency and unnecessary expenses. To address this, we introduce the Dynamic Auction-based Language Agent (DALA), a novel framework that treats communication bandwidth as a scarce and tradable resource. Specifically, our DALA regards inter-agent communication as a centralized auction, where agents learn to bid for the opportunity to speak based on the predicted value density of their messages. Thus, our DALA intrinsically encourages agents to produce concise, informative messages while filtering out low-value communication.
Extensive and comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our economically-driven DALA achieves new state-of-the-art performance across seven challenging reasoning benchmarks, including 84.32% on MMLU and a 91.21% pass@1 rate on HumanEval. Note that this is accomplished with remarkable efficiency, i.e., our DALA uses only 6.25 million tokens, a fraction of the resources consumed by current state-of-the-art methods on GSM8K. Further analysis reveals that our DALA cultivates the emergent skill of strategic silence, effectively adapting its communication strategies from verbosity to silence in a dynamic manner via resource constraints.
Symbolic Planning and Multi-Agent Path Finding in Extremely Dense Environments with Unassigned Agents
Authors: Bo Fu; Zhe Chen; Rahul Chandan; Alexandre Ormiga Galvao Barbosa; Michael Caldara; Joey W. Durham; Federico Pecora
Venue: AAAI 2026 (main)

Abstract: We introduce the Block Rearrangement Problem (BRaP), a challenging component of large warehouse management which involves rearranging storage blocks within dense grids to achieve a goal state. We formally define the BRaP as a graph search problem. Building on intuitions from sliding puzzle problems, we propose five search-based solution algorithms, leveraging joint configuration space search, classical planning, multi-agent pathfinding, and expert heuristics. We evaluate the five approaches empirically for plan quality and scalability. Despite the exponential relation between search space size and block number, our methods demonstrate efficiency in creating rearrangement plans for deeply buried blocks in up to 80x80 grids.