GenAI4ELab/papercli-papers huggingface dataset:
Benchmarking the Benchmarks: Reproducing Climate-Related NLP Tasks
Authors: Tom Calamai; Oana Balalau; Fabian M. Suchanek
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Significant efforts have been made in the NLP community to facilitate the automatic analysis of climate-related corpora by tasks such as climate-related topic detection, climate risk classification, question answering over climate topics, and many more. In this work, we perform a reproducibility study on 8 tasks and 29 datasets, testing 6 models. We find that many tasks rely heavily on surface-level keyword patterns rather than deeper semantic or contextual understanding. Moreover, we find that 96% of the datasets contain annotation issues, with 16.6% of the sampled wrong predictions of a zero-shot classifier being actually clear annotation mistakes, and 38.8% being ambiguous examples.These results call into question the reliability of current benchmarks to meaningfully compare models and highlight the need for improved annotation practices. We conclude by outlining actionable recommendations to enhance dataset quality and evaluation robustness.
Exploring Supervised Approaches to the Detection of Anthropomorphic Language in the Reporting of NLP Venues
Authors: Matthew Shardlow; Ashley Williams; Charlie Roadhouse; Filippos Ventirozos; Piotr Przybyła
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: We investigate the prevalence of anthropomorphic language in the reporting of AI technology, focussed on NLP and LLMs. We undertake a corpus annotation focussing on one year of ACL long-paper abstracts and news articles from the same period. We find that 74% of ACL abstracts and 88% of news articles contain some form of anthropomorphic description of AI technology. Further, we train a regression classifier based on BERT, demonstrating that we can automatically label abstracts for their degree of anthropomorphism based on our corpus. We conclude by applying this labelling process to abstracts available in the entire history of the ACL Anthology and reporting on diachronic and inter-venue findings, showing that the degree of anthropomorphism is increasing at all examined venues over time.
PersonaLens: A Benchmark for Personalization Evaluation in Conversational AI Assistants
Authors: Zheng Zhao; Clara Vania; Subhradeep Kayal; Naila Khan; Shay B. Cohen; Emine Yilmaz
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have advanced conversational AI assistants. However, systematically evaluating how well these assistants apply personalization—adapting to individual user preferences while completing tasks—remains challenging. Existing personalization benchmarks focus on chit-chat, non-conversational tasks, or narrow domains, failing to capture the complexities of personalized task-oriented assistance. To address this, we introduce PersonaLens, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating personalization in task-oriented AI assistants. Our benchmark features diverse user profiles equipped with rich preferences and interaction histories, along with two specialized LLM-based agents: a user agent that engages in realistic task-oriented dialogues with AI assistants, and a judge agent that employs the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm to assess personalization, response quality, and task success. Through extensive experiments with current LLM assistants across diverse tasks, we reveal significant variability in their personalization capabilities, providing crucial insights for advancing conversational AI systems.
iAgent: LLM Agent as a Shield between User and Recommender Systems
Authors: Wujiang Xu; Yunxiao Shi; Zujie Liang; Xuying Ning; Kai Mei; Kun Wang; Xi Zhu; Min Xu; Yongfeng Zhang
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Traditional recommender systems usually take the user-platform paradigm, where users are directly exposed under the control of the platform’s recommendation algorithms. However, the defect of recommendation algorithms may put users in very vulnerable positions under this paradigm. First, many sophisticated models are often designed with commercial objectives in mind, focusing on the platform’s benefits, which may hinder their ability to protect and capture users’ true interests. Second, these models are typically optimized using data from all users, which may overlook individual user’s preferences. Due to these shortcomings, users may experience several disadvantages under the traditional user-platform direct exposure paradigm, such as lack of control over the recommender system, potential manipulation by the platform, echo chamber effects, or lack of personalization for less active users due to the dominance of active users during collaborative learning. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a new paradigm to protect user interests and alleviate these issues. Recently, some researchers have introduced LLM agents to simulate user behaviors, these approaches primarily aim to optimize platform-side performance, leaving core issues in recommender systems unresolved. To address these limitations, we propose a new user-agent-platform paradigm, where agent serves as the protective shield between user and recommender system that enables indirect exposure. To this end, we first construct four recommendation datasets, denoted as InstructRec, along with user instructions for each record. To understand user’s intention, we design an Instruction-aware Agent capable of using tools to acquire knowledge from external environments. Moreover, we introduce an Individual Instruction-aware Agent, which incorporates a dynamic memory mechanism to optimize from individual feedback. Results on four datasets demonstrate that consistently achieves an average improvement of 16.6% over SOTA baselines across ranking metrics. Moreover, iAgent mitigates echo chamber effects and effectively alleviates the model bias in disadvantaged users (less-active), serving as a shield between user and recommender systems.
FactLens: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Fact Verification
Authors: Kushan Mitra; Dan Zhang; Sajjadur Rahman; Estevam Hruschka
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capability in language generation and understanding, but their tendency to hallucinate and produce factually incorrect information remains a key limitation. To verify LLM-generated contents and claims from other sources, traditional verification approaches often rely on holistic models that assign a single factuality label to complex claims, potentially obscuring nuanced errors. In this paper, we advocate for a shift towards fine-grained verification, where complex claims are broken down into smaller sub-claims for individual verification, allowing for more precise identification of inaccuracies, improved transparency, and reduced ambiguity in evidence retrieval. However, generating sub-claims poses challenges, such as maintaining context and ensuring semantic equivalence with respect to the original claim. We introduce **FactLens**, a benchmark for evaluating fine-grained fact verification, with metrics and automated evaluators of sub-claim quality. The benchmark data is manually curated to ensure high-quality ground truth. Our results show alignment between automated FactLens evaluators and human judgments, and we discuss the impact of sub-claim characteristics on the overall verification performance.
Process-based Self-Rewarding Language Models
Authors: Shimao Zhang; Xiao Liu; Xin Zhang; Junxiao Liu; Zheheng Luo; Shujian Huang; Yeyun Gong
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Large Language Models have demonstrated outstanding performance across various downstream tasks and have been widely applied in multiple scenarios. Human-annotated preference data is used for training to further improve LLMs’ performance, which is constrained by the upper limit of human performance. Therefore, Self-Rewarding method has been proposed, where LLMs generate training data by rewarding their own outputs. However, the existing self-rewarding paradigm is not effective in mathematical reasoning scenarios and may even lead to a decline in performance. In this work, we propose the Process-based Self-Rewarding pipeline for language models, which introduces long-thought reasoning, step-wise LLM-as-a-Judge, and step-wise preference optimization within the self-rewarding paradigm. Our new paradigm successfully enhances the performance of LLMs on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks through iterative Process-based Self-Rewarding, demonstrating the immense potential of process-based self-rewarding to achieve LLM reasoning that may surpass human capabilities.
The Devil Is in the Word Alignment Details: On Translation-Based Cross-Lingual Transfer for Token Classification Tasks
Authors: Benedikt Ebing; Goran Glavaš
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Translation-based strategies for cross-lingual transfer XLT such as translate-train—training on noisy target language data translated from the source language—and translate-test—evaluating on noisy source language data translated from the target language—are competitive XLT baselines. In XLT for token classification tasks, however, these strategies include label projection, the challenging step of mapping the labels from each token in the original sentence to its counterpart(s) in the translation. Although word aligners (WAs) are commonly used for label projection, the low-level design decisions for applying them to translation-based XLT have not been systematically investigated. Moreover, recent marker-based methods, which project labeled spans by inserting tags around them before (or after) translation, claim to outperform WAs in label projection for XLT. In this work, we revisit WAs for label projection, systematically investigating the effects of low-level design decisions on token-level XLT: (i) the algorithm for projecting labels between (multi-)token spans, (ii) filtering strategies to reduce the number of noisily mapped labels, and (iii) the pre-tokenization of the translated sentences. We find that all of these substantially impact translation-based XLT performance and show that, with optimized choices, XLT with WA offers performance at least comparable to that of marker-based methods. We then introduce a new projection strategy that ensembles translate-train and translate-test predictions and demonstrate that it substantially outperforms the marker-based projection. Crucially, we show that our proposed ensembling also reduces sensitivity to low-level WA design choices, resulting in more robust XLT for token classification tasks.
ShieldHead: Decoding-time Safeguard for Large Language Models
Authors: Zitao Xuan; Xiaofeng Mao; Da Chen; Xin Zhang; Yuhan Dong; Jun Zhou
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: In light of the widespread deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), the responsibility for safeguarding and regulating LLM-generated content has taken on heightened significance. Recent advancements in LLM-based moderation methods, e.g., LlamaGuard, have demonstrated remarkable promise in identifying safety risks associated with both inputs and outputs in human-AI interactions. However, integrating LLM-based safeguards into a chatbot system requires an additional inference stage involving a moderation LLM with billions of parameters, which significantly increases computational costs and reduces overall efficiency. In this paper, we demonstrate that simply learning a classification head on the last-layer hidden states of the dialogue model provides a strong capability to identify harmful contents. The classification head, referred to as ShieldHead, serves as an auxiliary branch paralleled with next-token-prediction LM head, enabling the detection of potential risks in past text sequences. Additionally, a label disambiguation technique is employed to supervise ShieldHead with both token-level and sentence-level labels, which further enhances its performance. ShieldHead exhibits remarkable efficiency during inference, providing real-time moderation results alongside token-wise streaming output during the chatbot system’s decoding phase. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed framework: a state-of-the-art performance on the XSTest and SafeRLHF datasets while running at a speed about **300×** faster (**<1ms**) than previous LLM-based moderation models with ** 99%** less parameters of LlamaGuard.
A Survey on Proactive Defense Strategies Against Misinformation in Large Language Models
Authors: Shuliang Liu; Hongyi Liu; Aiwei Liu; Duan Bingchen; Zheng Qi; Yibo Yan; He Geng; Peijie Jiang; Jia Liu; Xuming Hu
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: The widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs) across critical domains has amplified the societal risks posed by algorithmically generated misinformation. Unlike traditional false content, LLM-generated misinformation can be self-reinforcing, highly plausible, and capable of rapid propagation across multiple languages, which traditional detection methods fail to mitigate effectively. This paper introduces a proactive defense paradigm, shifting from passive post hoc detection to anticipatory mitigation strategies. We propose a Three Pillars framework: (1) Knowledge Credibility, fortifying the integrity of training and deployed data; (2) Inference Reliability, embedding self-corrective mechanisms during reasoning; and (3) Input Robustness, enhancing the resilience of model interfaces against adversarial attacks. Through a comprehensive survey of existing techniques and a comparative meta-analysis, we demonstrate that proactive defense strategies offer up to 63% improvement over conventional methods in misinformation prevention, despite non-trivial computational overhead and generalization challenges. We argue that future research should focus on co-designing robust knowledge foundations, reasoning certification, and attack-resistant interfaces to ensure LLMs can effectively counter misinformation across varied domains.
Smotrom tvoja på ander drogoj verden! Resurrecting Dead Pidgin with Generative Models: Russenorsk Case Study
Authors: Alexey Tikhonov; Sergei Shteiner; Anna Bykova; Ivan P. Yamshchikov
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Russenorsk, a pidgin language historically used in trade interactions between Russian and Norwegian speakers, represents a unique linguistic phenomenon. In this paper, we attempt to analyze its lexicon using modern large language models (LLMs), based on surviving literary sources. We construct a structured dictionary of the language, grouped by synonyms and word origins. Subsequently, we use this dictionary to formulate hypotheses about the core principles of word formation and grammatical structure in Russenorsk and show which hypotheses generated by large language models correspond to the hypotheses previously proposed ones in the academic literature. We also develop a “reconstruction” translation agent that generates hypothetical Russenorsk renderings of contemporary Russian and Norwegian texts.
PromptCoT: Synthesizing Olympiad-level Problems for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models
Authors: Xueliang Zhao; Wei Wu; Jian Guan; Lingpeng Kong
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: The ability of large language models to solve complex mathematical problems has progressed significantly, particularly for tasks requiring advanced reasoning. However, the scarcity of sufficiently challenging problems, particularly at the Olympiad level, hinders further advancements. In this work, we introduce PromptCoT, a novel approach for automatically generating high-quality Olympiad-level math problems. The proposed method synthesizes complex problems based on mathematical concepts and the rationale behind problem construction, emulating the thought processes of experienced problem designers. We provide a theoretical analysis demonstrating that an optimal rationale should maximize both the likelihood of rationale generation given the associated concepts and the likelihood of problem generation conditioned on both the rationale and the concepts. Our method is evaluated on standard benchmarks including GSM8K, MATH-500, and AIME2024, where it consistently outperforms existing problem generation methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PromptCoT exhibits superior scalability, consistently maintaining high performance as the dataset size increases, outperforming the baselines.
Speculative Sampling via Exponential Races
Authors: Szymon Kobus; Deniz Gunduz
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates large language model inference using a smaller draft model. In this paper, we establish a surprising connection between speculative sampling and the concept of channel simulation from information theory, which aims at simulating a noisy channel using as few bits as possible. This connection allows us to provide an information-theoretic analysis of the speed up that can be achieved by speculative sampling. Leveraging this link, we derive an explicit relation between generation speed-up and the number of tokens k generated by the draft model for large k, which serves as an upper bound for all k. We also propose a novel speculative sampling method via exponential races called ERSS that matches state-of-the-art performance.
Going Beyond Your Expectations in Latency Metrics for Simultaneous Speech Translation
Authors: Jorge Iranzo-Sánchez; Javier Iranzo-Sánchez; Adrià Giménez; Jorge Civera
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Current evaluation practices in Simultaneous Speech Translation (SimulST) systems typically involve segmenting the input audio and corresponding translations, calculating quality and latency metrics for each segment, and averaging the results. Although this approach may provide a reliable estimation of translation quality, it can lead to misleading values of latency metrics due to an inherent assumption that average latency values are good enough estimators of SimulST systems’ response time. However, our detailed analysis of latency evaluations for state-of-the-art SimulST systems demonstrates that latency distributions are often skewed and subject to extreme variations. As a result, the mean in latency metrics fails to capture these anomalies, potentially masking the lack of robustness in some systems and metrics. In this paper, a thorough analysis of the results of systems submitted to recent editions of the IWSLT simultaneous track is provided to support our hypothesis and alternative ways to report latency metrics are proposed in order to provide a better understanding of SimulST systems’ latency.
Towards a Design Guideline for RPA Evaluation: A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Role-Playing Agents
Authors: Chaoran Chen; Bingsheng Yao; Ruishi Zou; Wenyue Hua; Weimin Lyu; Toby Jia-Jun Li; Dakuo Wang
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Role-Playing Agent (RPA) is an increasingly popular type of LLM Agent that simulates human-like behaviors in a variety of tasks. However, evaluating RPAs is challenging due to diverse task requirements and agent designs.This paper proposes an evidence-based, actionable, and generalizable evaluation design guideline for LLM-based RPA by systematically reviewing 1,676 papers published between Jan. 2021 and Dec. 2024.Our analysis identifies six agent attributes, seven task attributes, and seven evaluation metrics from existing literature.Based on these findings, we present an RPA evaluation design guideline to help researchers develop more systematic and consistent evaluation methods.
Recursive Question Understanding for Complex Question Answering over Heterogeneous Personal Data
Authors: Philipp Christmann; Gerhard Weikum
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Question answering over mixed sources, like text and tables, has been advanced by verbalizing all contents and encoding it with a language model. A prominent case of such heterogeneous data is personal information: user devices log vast amounts of data every day, such as calendar entries, workout statistics, shopping records, streaming history, and more. Information needs range from simple look-ups to queries of analytical nature. The challenge is to provide humans with convenient access with small footprint, so that all personal data stays on the user devices. We present ReQAP, a novel method that creates an executable operator tree for a given question, via recursive decomposition. Operators are designed to enable seamless integration of structured and unstructured sources, and the execution of the operator tree yields a traceable answer. We further release the PerQA benchmark, with persona-based data and questions, covering a diverse spectrum of realistic user needs.
PreSumm: Predicting Summarization Performance Without Summarizing
Authors: Steven Koniaev; Ori Ernst; Jackie CK Cheung
Venue: ACL 2025 (Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025)

Abstract: Despite recent advancements in automatic summarization, state-of-the-art models do not summarize all documents equally well, raising the question: why? While prior research has extensively analyzed summarization models, little attention has been given to the role of document characteristics in influencing summarization performance.In this work, we explore two key research questions. First, do documents exhibit consistent summarization quality across multiple systems? If so, can we predict a document’s summarization performance without generating a summary? We answer both questions affirmatively and introduce PreSumm, a novel task in which a system predicts summarization performance based solely on the source document. Our analysis sheds light on common properties of documents with low PreSumm scores, revealing that they often suffer from coherence issues, complex content, or a lack of a clear main theme.In addition, we demonstrate PreSumm’s practical utility in two key applications: improving hybrid summarization workflows by identifying documents that require manual summarization and enhancing dataset quality by filtering outliers and noisy documents.Overall, our findings highlight the critical role of document properties in summarization performance and offer insights into the limitations of current systems that could serve as the basis for future improvements.