GenAI4ELab/papercli-papers huggingface dataset:
Understanding and Improving the Robustness of Terminology Constraints in Neural Machine Translation
Authors: Huaao Zhang; Qiang Wang; Bo Qin; Zelin Shi; Haibo Wang; Ming Chen
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: In this work, we study the robustness of two typical terminology translation methods: Placeholder (PH) and Code-Switch (CS), concerning (1) the number of constraints and (2) the target constraint length. We identify that existing terminology constraint test sets, such as IATE, Wiktionary, and TICO, are blind to this issue due to oversimplified constraint settings. To solve it, we create a new challenging test set of English-German, increasing the average constraint count per sentence from 1.1~1.7 to 6.1 and the length per target constraint from 1.1~1.2 words to 3.4 words. Then we find that PH and CS methods degrade as the number of constraints increases, but they have complementary strengths. Specifically, PH is better at retaining high constraint accuracy but lower translation quality as measured by BLEU and COMET scores. In contrast, CS has the opposite results. Based on these observations, we propose a simple but effective method combining the advantages of PH and CS. This approach involves training a model like PH to predict the term labels, and then during inference replacing those labels with target terminology text like CS, so that the subsequent generation is aware of the target term content. Extensive experimental results show that this approach can achieve high constraint accuracy and translation quality simultaneously, regardless of the number or length of constraints.
Language model acceptability judgements are not always robust to context
Authors: Koustuv Sinha; Jon Gauthier; Aaron Mueller; Kanishka Misra; Keren Fuentes; Roger Levy; Adina Williams
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Targeted syntactic evaluations of language models ask whether models show stable preferences for syntactically acceptable content over minimal-pair unacceptable inputs. Our best syntactic evaluation datasets, however, provide substantially less linguistic context than models receive during pretraining. This mismatch raises an important question: how robust are models’ syntactic judgements across different contexts? In this paper, we vary the input contexts based on: length, the types of syntactic phenomena it contains, and whether or not there are grammatical violations. We find that model judgements are generally robust when placed in randomly sampled linguistic contexts, but are unstable when contexts match the test stimuli in syntactic structure. Among all tested models (GPT-2 and five variants of OPT), we find that model performance is affected when we provided contexts with matching syntactic structure: performance significantly improves when contexts are acceptable, and it significantly declines when they are unacceptable. This effect is amplified by the length of the context, except for unrelated inputs. We show that these changes in model performance are not explainable by acceptability-preserving syntactic perturbations. This sensitivity to highly specific syntactic features of the context can only be explained by the models’ implicit in-context learning abilities.
RobuT: A Systematic Study of Table QA Robustness Against Human-Annotated Adversarial Perturbations
Authors: Yilun Zhao; Chen Zhao; Linyong Nan; Zhenting Qi; Wenlin Zhang; Xiangru Tang; Boyu Mi; Dragomir Radev
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Despite significant progress having been made in question answering on tabular data (Table QA), it’s unclear whether, and to what extent existing Table QA models are robust to task-specific perturbations, e.g., replacing key question entities or shuffling table columns. To systematically study the robustness of Table QA models, we propose a benchmark called RobuT, which builds upon existing Table QA datasets (WTQ, WikiSQL-Weak, and SQA) and includes human-annotated adversarial perturbations in terms of table header, table content, and question. Our results indicate that both state-of-the-art Table QA models and large language models (e.g., GPT-3) with few-shot learning falter in these adversarial sets. We propose to address this problem by using large language models to generate adversarial examples to enhance training, which significantly improves the robustness of Table QA models.
Morphological Inflection: A Reality Check
Authors: Jordan Kodner; Sarah Payne; Salam Khalifa; Zoey Liu
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Morphological inflection is a popular task in sub-word NLP with both practical and cognitive applications. For years now, state-of-the-art systems have reported high, but also highly variable, performance across data sets and languages. We investigate the causes of this high performance and high variability; we find several aspects of data set creation and evaluation which systematically inflate performance and obfuscate differences between languages. To improve generalizability and reliability of results, we propose new data sampling and evaluation strategies that better reflect likely use-cases. Using these new strategies, we make new observations on the generalization abilities of current inflection systems.
TOME: A Two-stage Approach for Model-based Retrieval
Authors: Ruiyang Ren; Wayne Xin Zhao; Jing Liu; Hua Wu; Ji-Rong Wen; Haifeng Wang
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Recently, model-based retrieval has emerged as a new paradigm in text retrieval that discards the index in the traditional retrieval model and instead memorizes the candidate corpora using model parameters. This design employs a sequence-to-sequence paradigm to generate document identifiers, which enables the complete capture of the relevance between queries and documents and simplifies the classic index-retrieval-rerank pipeline. Despite its attractive qualities, there remain several major challenges in model-based retrieval, including the discrepancy between pre-training and fine-tuning, and the discrepancy between training and inference. To deal with the above challenges, we propose a novel two-stage model-based retrieval approach called TOME, which makes two major technical contributions, including the utilization of tokenized URLs as identifiers and the design of a two-stage generation architecture. We also propose a number of training strategies to deal with the training difficulty as the corpus size increases. Extensive experiments and analysis on MS MARCO and Natural Questions demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, and we investigate the scaling laws of TOME by examining various influencing factors.
Using Neural Machine Translation for Generating Diverse Challenging Exercises for Language Learner
Authors: Frank Palma Gomez; Subhadarshi Panda; Michael Flor; Alla Rozovskaya
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: We propose a novel approach to automatically generate distractors for cloze exercises for English language learners, using round-trip neural machine translation. A carrier sentence is translated from English into another (pivot) language and back, and distractors are produced by aligning the original sentence with its round-trip translation. We make use of 16 linguistically-diverse pivots and generate hundreds of translation hypotheses in each direction. We show that using hundreds of translations allows us to generate a rich set of challenging distractors. Moreover, we find that typologically unrelated language pivots contribute more diverse candidate distractors, compared to language pivots that are closely related. We further evaluate the use of machine translation systems of varying quality and find that better quality MT systems produce more challenging distractors. Finally, we conduct a study with language learners, demonstrating that the automatically generated distractors are of the same difficulty as the gold distractors produced by human experts.
Similarity-weighted Construction of Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-intense Argumentation Tasks
Authors: Moritz Plenz; Juri Opitz; Philipp Heinisch; Philipp Cimiano; Anette Frank
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Arguments often do not make explicit how a conclusion follows from its premises. To compensate for this lack, we enrich arguments with structured background knowledge to support knowledge-intense argumentation tasks. We present a new unsupervised method for constructing Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge Graphs (CCKGs) that selects contextually relevant knowledge from large knowledge graphs (KGs) efficiently and at high quality. Our work goes beyond context-insensitive knowledge extraction heuristics by computing semantic similarity between KG triplets and textual arguments. Using these triplet similarities as weights, we extract contextualized knowledge paths that connect a conclusion to its premise, while maximizing similarity to the argument. We combine multiple paths into a CCKG that we optionally prune to reduce noise and raise precision. Intrinsic evaluation of the quality of our graphs shows that our method is effective for (re)constructing human explanation graphs. Manual evaluations in a large-scale knowledge selection setup verify high recall and precision of implicit CSK in the CCKGs. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of CCKGs in a knowledge-insensitive argument quality rating task, outperforming strong baselines and rivaling a GPT-3 based system.
miCSE: Mutual Information Contrastive Learning for Low-shot Sentence Embeddings
Authors: Tassilo Klein; Moin Nabi
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: This paper presents miCSE, a mutual information-based contrastive learning framework that significantly advances the state-of-the-art in few-shot sentence embedding. The proposed approach imposes alignment between the attention pattern of different views during contrastive learning. Learning sentence embeddings with miCSE entails enforcing the structural consistency across augmented views for every sentence, making contrastive self-supervised learning more sample efficient. As a result, the proposed approach shows strong performance in the few-shot learning domain. While it achieves superior results compared to state-of-the-art methods on multiple benchmarks in few-shot learning, it is comparable in the full-shot scenario. This study opens up avenues for efficient self-supervised learning methods that are more robust than current contrastive methods for sentence embedding.
Learning Non-linguistic Skills without Sacrificing Linguistic Proficiency
Authors: Mandar Sharma; Nikhil Muralidhar; Naren Ramakrishnan
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: The field of Math-NLP has witnessed significant growth in recent years, motivated by the desire to expand LLM performance to the leaning of non-linguistic notions (numerals, and subsequently, arithmetic reasoning). However, non-linguistic skill injection typically comes at a cost for LLMs: it leads to catastrophic forgetting of core linguistic skills, a consequence that often remains unaddressed in the literature. As Math-NLP has been able to create LLMs that can closely approximate the mathematical skills of a grade schooler or the arithmetic reasoning skills of a calculator, the practicality of these models fail if they concomitantly shed their linguistic capabilities. In this work, we take a closer look into the phenomena of catastrophic forgetting as it pertains to LLMs and subsequently offer a novel framework for non-linguistic skill injection for LLMs based on information-theoretic interventions and skill-specific losses that enable the learning of strict arithmetic reasoning. Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art both on injected non-linguistic skills and on linguistic knowledge retention, and does so with a fraction of the non-linguistic training data (1/4) and zero additional synthetic linguistic training data.
Forgotten Knowledge: Examining the Citational Amnesia in NLP
Authors: Janvijay Singh; Mukund Rungta; Diyi Yang; Saif Mohammad
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Citing papers is the primary method through which modern scientific writing discusses and builds on past work. Collectively, citing a diverse set of papers (in time and area of study) is an indicator of how widely the community is reading. Yet, there is little work looking at broad temporal patterns of citation. This work systematically and empirically examines: How far back in time do we tend to go to cite papers? How has that changed over time, and what factors correlate with this citational attention/amnesia? We chose NLP as our domain of interest and analyzed approximately 71.5K papers to show and quantify several key trends in citation. Notably, around 62% of cited papers are from the immediate five years prior to publication, whereas only about 17% are more than ten years old. Furthermore, we show that the median age and age diversity of cited papers were steadily increasing from 1990 to 2014, but since then, the trend has reversed, and current NLP papers have an all-time low temporal citation diversity. Finally, we show that unlike the 1990s, the highly cited papers in the last decade were also papers with the least citation diversity, likely contributing to the intense (and arguably harmful) recency focus. Code, data, and a demo are available on the project homepage.
Measuring the Instability of Fine-Tuning
Authors: Yupei Du; Dong Nguyen
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Fine-tuning pre-trained language models on downstream tasks with varying random seeds has been shown to be unstable, especially on small datasets. Many previous studies have investigated this instability and proposed methods to mitigate it. However, most of these studies only used the standard deviation of performance scores (SD) as their measure, which is a narrow characterization of instability. In this paper, we analyze SD and six other measures quantifying instability of different granularity levels. Moreover, we propose a systematic evaluation framework of these measures’ validity. Finally, we analyze the consistency and difference between different measures by reassessing existing instability mitigation methods. We hope our results will inform better measurements of the fine-tuning instability.
FairPrism: Evaluating Fairness-Related Harms in Text Generation
Authors: Eve Fleisig; Aubrie Amstutz; Chad Atalla; Su Lin Blodgett; Hal Daumé III; Alexandra Olteanu; Emily Sheng; Dan Vann; Hanna Wallach
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: It is critical to measure and mitigate fairness-related harms caused by AI text generation systems, including stereotyping and demeaning harms. To that end, we introduce FairPrism, a dataset of 5,000 examples of AI-generated English text with detailed human annotations covering a diverse set of harms relating to gender and sexuality. FairPrism aims to address several limitations of existing datasets for measuring and mitigating fairness-related harms, including improved transparency, clearer specification of dataset coverage, and accounting for annotator disagreement and harms that are context-dependent. FairPrism’s annotations include the extent of stereotyping and demeaning harms, the demographic groups targeted, and appropriateness for different applications. The annotations also include specific harms that occur in interactive contexts and harms that raise normative concerns when the “speaker” is an AI system. Due to its precision and granularity, FairPrism can be used to diagnose (1) the types of fairness-related harms that AI text generation systems cause, and (2) the potential limitations of mitigation methods, both of which we illustrate through case studies. Finally, the process we followed to develop FairPrism offers a recipe for building improved datasets for measuring and mitigating harms caused by AI systems.
Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedback
Authors: Paul Roit; Johan Ferret; Lior Shani; Roee Aharoni; Geoffrey Cideron; Robert Dadashi; Matthieu Geist; Sertan Girgin; Leonard Hussenot; Orgad Keller; Nikola Momchev; Sabela Ramos Garea; Piotr Stanczyk; Nino Vieillard; Olivier Bachem; Gal Elidan; Avinatan Hassidim; Olivier Pietquin; Idan Szpektor
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Despite the seeming success of contemporary grounded text generation systems, they often tend to generate factually inconsistent text with respect to their input. This phenomenon is emphasized in tasks like summarization, in which the generated summaries should be corroborated by their source article. In this work we leverage recent progress on textual entailment models to directly address this problem for abstractive summarization systems. We use reinforcement learning with reference-free, textual-entailment rewards to optimize for factual consistency and explore the ensuing trade-offs, as improved consistency may come at the cost of less informative or more extractive summaries. Our results, according to both automatic metrics and human evaluation, show that our method considerably improves the faithfulness, salience and conciseness of the generated summaries.
SIMMC-VR: A Task-oriented Multimodal Dialog Dataset with Situated and Immersive VR Streams
Authors: Te-Lin Wu; Satwik Kottur; Andrea Madotto; Mahmoud Azab; Pedro Rodriguez; Babak Damavandi; Nanyun Peng; Seungwhan Moon
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Building an AI assistant that can seamlessly converse and instruct humans, in a user-centric situated scenario, requires several essential abilities:(1) spatial and temporal understanding of the situated and real-time user scenes,(2) capability of grounding the actively perceived visuals of users to conversation contexts,and (3) conversational reasoning over past utterances to perform just-in-time assistance. However, we currently lack a large-scale benchmark that captures user–assistant interactions with all of the aforementioned features. To this end, we propose SIMMC-VR, an extension of the SIMMC-2.0 dataset, to a video-grounded task-oriented dialog dataset that captures real-world AI-assisted user scenarios in VR.We propose a novel data collection paradigm that involves(1) generating object-centric multimodal dialog flows with egocentric visual streams and visually-grounded templates,and (2) manually paraphrasing the simulated dialogs for naturalness and diversity while preserving multimodal dependencies. To measure meaningful progress in the field, we propose four tasks to address the new challenges in SIMMC-VR, which require complex spatial-temporal dialog reasoning in active egocentric scenes. We benchmark the proposed tasks with strong multimodal models, and highlight the key capabilities that current models lack for future research directions.
Multilingual LLMs are Better Cross-lingual In-context Learners with Alignment
Authors: Eshaan Tanwar; Subhabrata Dutta; Manish Borthakur; Tanmoy Chakraborty
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) unfolds as large language models become capable of inferring test labels conditioned on a few labeled samples without any gradient update. ICL-enabled large language models provide a promising step forward toward bypassing recurrent annotation costs in a low-resource setting. Yet, only a handful of past studies have explored ICL in a cross-lingual setting, in which the need for transferring label-knowledge from a high-resource language to a low-resource one is immensely crucial. To bridge the gap, we provide the first in-depth analysis of ICL for cross-lingual text classification. We find that the prevalent mode of selecting random input-label pairs to construct the prompt-context is severely limited in the case of cross-lingual ICL, primarily due to the lack of alignment in the input as well as the output spaces. To mitigate this, we propose a novel prompt construction strategy — Cross-lingual In-context Source Target Alignment (X-InSTA). With an injected coherence in the semantics of the input examples and a task-based alignment across the source and target languages, X-InSTA is able to outperform random prompt selection by a large margin across three different tasks using 44 different cross-lingual pairs.
APOLLO: A Simple Approach for Adaptive Pretraining of Language Models for Logical Reasoning
Authors: Soumya Sanyal; Yichong Xu; Shuohang Wang; Ziyi Yang; Reid Pryzant; Wenhao Yu; Chenguang Zhu; Xiang Ren
Venue: ACL 2023 (Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

Abstract: Logical reasoning over text is an important ability that requires understanding the semantics of the text and reasoning through them to arrive at correct inferences. Prior works on pretraining language models to improve the logical reasoning ability require complex processing of training data (e.g., aligning symbolic knowledge to text), yielding task-specific data augmentation that is not easy to adapt to any general text corpus. In this work, we propose APOLLO, a simple adaptive pretraining approach to improve the logical reasoning skills of language models. We select a subset of Wikipedia for adaptive pretraining using a set of logical inference keywords as filter words. Further, we propose two self-supervised loss functions for training. First, we modify the masked language modeling loss only to mask specific parts-of-speech words that likely require higher-order reasoning to predict them. Second, we propose a sentence-level classification loss that teaches the model to distinguish between entailment and contradiction types of sentences. The proposed pretraining paradigm is both simple and independent of task formats. We demonstrate the effectiveness of APOLLO by comparing it with prior baselines on two logical reasoning datasets. APOLLO performs comparably on ReClor and outperforms baselines on LogiQA.