GenAI4ELab/papercli-papers huggingface dataset:
From Evidence Mining to Meta-Prediction: a Gradient of Methodologies for Task-Specific Challenges in Psychological Assessment
Authors: Federico Ravenda; Fawzia-Zehra Kara-Isitt; Stephen Swift; Antonietta Mira; Andrea Raballo
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly used in the medical field, particularly in psychiatry where language plays a fundamental role in diagnosis. This study explores the use of open-source LLMs within the MIND framework. Specifically, we implemented a mixed-methods approach for the CLPsych 2025 shared task: (1) we used a combination of retrieval and few-shot learning approaches to highlight evidence of mental states within the text and to generate comprehensive summaries for post-level and timeline-level analysis, allowing for effective tracking of psychological state fluctuations over time (2) we developed different types of ensemble methods for well-being score prediction, combining Machine Learning and Optimization approaches on top of zero-shot LLMs predictions. Notably, for the latter task, our approach demonstrated the best performance within the competition.
From Posts to Timelines: Modeling Mental Health Dynamics from Social Media Timelines with Hybrid LLMs
Authors: Zimu Wang; Hongbin Na; Rena Gao; Jiayuan Ma; Yining Hua; Ling Chen; Wei Wang
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: Social media data is recognized for its usefulness in the early detection of mental disorders; however, there is a lack of research focused on modeling individuals’ longitudinal mental health dynamics. Moreover, fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on large-scale, annotated datasets presents challenges due to privacy concerns and the difficulties on data collection and annotation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for modeling mental health dynamics using hybrid LLMs, where we first apply both classification-based and generation-based models to identify adaptive and maladaptive evidence from individual posts. This evidence is then used to predict well-being scores and generate post-level and timeline-level summaries. Experimental results on the CLPsych 2025 shared task demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, with the generative-based model showing a marked advantage in evidence identification.
Prompt Engineering for Capturing Dynamic Mental Health Self States from Social Media Posts
Authors: Callum Chan; Sunveer Khunkhun; Diana Inkpen; Juan Antonio Lossio-Ventura
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: With the advent of modern Computational Linguistic techniques and the growing societal mental health crisis, we contribute to the field of Clinical Psychology by participating in the CLPsych 2025 shared task. This paper describes the methods and results obtained by the uOttawa team’s submission (which included a researcher from the National Institutes of Health in the USA, in addition to three researchers from the University of Ottawa, Canada). The task consists of four subtasks focused on modeling longitudinal changes in social media users’ mental states and generating accurate summaries of these dynamic self-states. Through prompt engineering of a modern large language model (Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct), the uOttawa team placed first, sixth, fifth, and second, respectively, for each subtask, amongst the other submissions. This work demonstrates the capacity of modern large language models to recognize nuances in the analysis of mental states and to generate summaries through carefully crafted prompting.
Retrieval-Enhanced Mental Health Assessment: Capturing Self-State Dynamics from Social Media Using In-Context Learning
Authors: Anson Antony; Annika Schoene
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: This paper presents our approach to the CLPsych 2025 (Tseriotou et al., 2025) shared task, where our proposed system implements a comprehensive solution using In-Context Learning (ICL) with vector similarity to retrieve relevant examples that guide Large Language Models (LLMs) without specific fine-tuning. We leverage ICL to analyze self-states and mental health indicators across three tasks. We developed a pipeline architecture using Ollama, where we are running Llama 3.3 70B locally and specialized vector databases for post- and timeline-level examples. We experimented with different numbers of retrieved examples (k=5 and k=10) to optimize performance. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of ICL for clinical assessment tasks, particularly when dealing with limited training data in sensitive domains. The system shows strong performance across all tasks, with particular strength in capturing self-state dynamics.
Self-State Evidence Extraction and Well-Being Prediction from Social Media Timelines
Authors: Suchandra Chakraborty; Sudeshna Jana; Manjira Sinha; Tirthankar Dasgupta
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: This study explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) and supervised learning to analyze social media posts from Reddit users, addressing two key objectives: first, to extract adaptive and maladaptive self-state evidence that supports psychological assessment (Task A1); and second, to predict a well-being score that reflects the user’s mental state (Task A2). We propose i) a fine-tuned RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019) model for Task A1 to identify self-state evidence spans and ii) evaluate two approaches for Task A2: a retrieval-augmented DeepSeek-7B (DeepSeek-AI et al., 2025) model and a Random Forest regression model trained on sentence embeddings. While LLM-based prompting utilizes contextual reasoning, our findings indicate that supervised learning provides more reliable numerical predictions. The RoBERTa model achieves the highest recall (0.602) for Task A1, and Random Forest regression outperforms DeepSeek-7B for Task A2 (MSE: 2.994 vs. 6.610). These results highlight the strengths and limitations of generative vs. supervised methods in mental health NLP, contributing to the development of privacy-conscious, resource-efficient approaches for psychological assessment. This work is part of the CLPsych 2025 shared task (Tseriotou et al., 2025).
Team ISM at CLPsych 2025: Capturing Mental Health Dynamics from Social Media Timelines using A Pretrained Large Language Model with In-Context Learning
Authors: Vu Tran; Tomoko Matsui
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: We tackle the task by using a pretrained large language model (LLM) and in-context learning with template-based instructions to guide the LLM. To improve generation quality, we employ a two-step procedure: sampling and selection. For the sampling step, we randomly sample a subset of the provided training data for the context of LLM prompting. Next, for the selection step, we map the LLM generated outputs into a vector space and employ the Gaussian kernel density estimation to select the most likely output. The results show that the approach can achieve a certain degree of performance and there is still room for improvement.
Transformer-Based Analysis of Adaptive and Maladaptive Self-States in Longitudinal Social Media Data
Authors: Abhin B; Renukasakshi V Patil
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: The CLPsych workshop, held annually since 2014, promotes the application of computational linguistics to behavioral analysis and neurological health assessment. The CLPsych 2025 shared task, extending the framework of the 2022 iteration, leverages the MIND framework to model temporal fluctuations in mental states. This shared task comprises three sub-tasks, each presenting substantial challenges to natural language processing (NLP) systems, requiring sensitive and precise outcomes in analyzing adaptive and maladaptive behaviors. In this study, we employed a range of modeling strategies tailored to the requirements and expected outputs of each subtask. Our approach mostly utilized traditional language models like BERT, LongFormer and Pegasus diverging from the prevalent trend of prompt-tuned large language models. We achieved an overall ranking of 13th, with subtask rankings of 8th in Task 1a, 13th in Task 1b, 8th in Task 2, and 7th in Task 3. These results highlight the efficacy of our methods while underscoring areas for further refinement in handling complex behavioral data.
Who We Are, Where We Are: Mental Health at the Intersection of Person, Situation, and Large Language Models
Authors: Nikita Soni; August Håkan Nilsson; Syeda Mahwish; Vasudha Varadarajan; H. Andrew Schwartz; Ryan L. Boyd
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025))

Abstract: Mental health is not a fixed trait but a dynamic process shaped by the interplay between individual dispositions and situational contexts. Building on interactionist and constructionist psychological theories, we develop interpretable models to predict well-being and identify adaptive and maladaptive self-states in longitudinal social media data. Our approach integrates person-level psychological traits (e.g., resilience, cognitive distortions, implicit motives) with language-inferred situational features derived from the Situational 8 DIAMONDS framework. We compare these theory-grounded features to embeddings from a psychometrically-informed language model that captures temporal and individual-specific patterns. Results show that our principled, theory-driven features provide competitive performance while offering greater interpretability. Qualitative analyses further highlight the psychological coherence of features most predictive of well-being. These findings underscore the value of integrating computational modeling with psychological theory to assess dynamic mental states in contextually sensitive and human-understandable ways.
Linguistic Blind Spots of Large Language Models
Authors: Jiali Cheng; Hadi Amiri
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) serve as the foundation of numerous AI applications today. However, despite their remarkable proficiency in generating coherent text, questions linger regarding their ability in performing fine-grained linguistic annotation tasks, such as detecting nouns or verbs, or identifying more complex syntactic structures like clauses or T-units in input texts. These tasks require precise syntactic and semantic understanding of input text, and when LLMs underperform on specific linguistic structures, it raises concerns about their reliability for detailed linguistic analysis and whether their (even correct) outputs truly reflect an understanding of the inputs. In this paper, we empirically study recent LLMs performance across fine-grained linguistic annotation tasks. Through a series of experiments, we find that recent LLMs show limited efficacy in addressing linguistic queries and often struggle with linguistically complex inputs. We show that the most capable LLM (Llama3-70b) makes notable errors in detecting linguistic structures, such as misidentifying embedded clauses, failing to recognize verb phrases, and confusing complex nominals with clauses. Our study provides valuable insights to inform future endeavors in LLM design and development.
ParaBLoCC: Parallel Basic Locative Constructions Corpus
Authors: Peter Viechnicki; Anthony Kostacos
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: We introduce ParaBLoCC, the Parallel Basic Locative Construction Corpus, the first multilingual compendium of this important grammatico-functional construction, and particularly the first such corpus containing semantically equivalent BLCs in source/target language pairs. The data – taken from bitext corpora in English paired with twenty-six typologically diverse languages – are likely to prove useful for studying questions of cognitive underpinnings and cross-linguistic usage patterns of spatial expressions, as well as for improving multilingual spatial relation extraction and related tasks. The data are being made available at https://github.com/pviechnicki/parablocc.
Capturing Online SRC/ORC Effort with Memory Measures from a Minimalist Parser
Authors: Aniello De Santo
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: A parser for Minimalist grammars (Stabler, 2013) has been shown to successfully model sentence processing preferences across an array of languages and phenomena when combined with complexity metrics that relate parsing behavior to memory usage (Gerth, 2015; Graf et al., 2017; De Santo, 2020, a.o.). This model provides a quantifiable theory of the effects of fine-grained grammatical structure on cognitive cost, and can help strengthen the link between generative syntactic theory and sentence processing.However, work on it has focused on offline asymmetries.Here, we extend this approach by showing how memory-based measures of effort that explicitly consider minimalist-like structure-building operations improve our ability to account for word-by-word (online) behavioral data.
From Punchlines to Predictions: A Metric to Assess LLM Performance in Identifying Humor in Stand-Up Comedy
Authors: Adrianna Romanowski; Pedro H. V. Valois; Kazuhiro Fukui
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: Comedy serves as a profound reflection of the times we live in and is a staple element of human interactions. In light of the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs), the intersection of humor and AI has become no laughing matter. Advancements in the naturalness of human-computer interaction correlates with improvements in AI systems’ abilities to understand humor. In this study, we assess the ability of models in accurately identifying humorous quotes from a stand-up comedy transcript. Stand-up comedy’s unique comedic narratives make it an ideal dataset to improve the overall naturalness of comedic understanding. We propose a novel humor detection metric designed to evaluate LLMs amongst various prompts on their capability to extract humorous punchlines. The metric has a modular structure that offers three different scoring methods - fuzzy string matching, sentence embedding, and subspace similarity - to provide an overarching assessment of a model’s performance. The model’s results are compared against those of human evaluators on the same task. Our metric reveals that regardless of prompt engineering, leading models, ChatGPT, Claude, and DeepSeek, achieve scores of at most 51% in humor detection. Notably, this performance surpasses that of humans who achieve a score of 41%. The analysis of human evaluators and LLMs reveals variability in agreement, highlighting the subjectivity inherent in humor and the complexities involved in extracting humorous quotes from live performance transcripts.
Profiling neural grammar induction on morphemically tokenised child-directed speech
Authors: Mila Marcheva; Theresa Biberauer; Weiwei Sun
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: We investigate the performance of state-of-the-art (SotA) neural grammar induction (GI) models on a morphemically tokenised English dataset based on the CHILDES treebank (Pearl and Sprouse, 2013). Using implementations from Yang et al. (2021a), we train models and evaluate them with the standard F1 score. We introduce novel evaluation metrics—depth-of-morpheme and sibling-of-morpheme—which measure phenomena around bound morpheme attachment. Our results reveal that models with the highest F1 scores do not necessarily induce linguistically plausible structures for bound morpheme attachment, highlighting a key challenge for cognitively plausible GI.
Exploring the Integration of Eye Movement Data on Word Embeddings
Authors: Fermín Travi; Gabriel Aimé Leclercq; Diego Fernandez Slezak; Bruno Bianchi; Juan E Kamienkowski
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: Reading, while structured, is a non-linear process. Readers may skip some words, linger on others, or revisit earlier text. Emerging work has started exploring the incorporation of reading behaviour through eye-tracking into the training of specific language tasks. In this work, we investigate the broader question of how gaze data can shape word embeddings by using text as read by human participants and predicting gaze measures from them. To that end, we conducted an eye-tracking experiment with 76 participants reading 20 short stories in Spanish and fine-tuned Word2Vec and LSTM models on the collected data. Evaluations with representational similarity analysis and word pair similarities showed a limited, but largely consistent, gain from gaze incorporation, suggesting future work should expand linguistic diversity and use cognitively aligned evaluations to better understand its role in bridging computational and human language representations.
Unzipping the Causality of Zipf’s Law and Other Lexical Trade-offs
Authors: Amanda Doucette; Timothy J. O’Donnell; Morgan Sonderegger
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: There are strong constraints on the structure of a possible lexicon. For example, the negative correlation between word frequency and length known as Zipf’s law, and a negative correlation between word length and phonotactic complexity appear to hold across languages. While lexical trade-offs like these have been examined individually, it is unclear how they interact as a system. In this paper, we propose causal discovery as a method for identifying lexical biases and their interactions in a set of variables. We represent the lexicon as a causal model, and apply the Fast Causal Discovery algorithm (Spirtes et al., 1995) to identify both causal relationships between measured variables and the existence of possible unmeasured confounding variables. We apply this method to lexical data including measures of word length, frequency, phonotactic complexity, and morphological irregularity for 25 languages and find evidence of universal associations involving word length with a high likelihood of involving an unmeasured confounder, suggesting that additional variables need to be measured to determine how they are related. We also find evidence of variation across languages in relationships between the remaining variables, and suggest that given a larger dataset, causal discovery algorithms can be a useful tool in assessing the universality of lexical biases.
Quantifying Semantic Functional Specialization in the Brain Using Encoding Models of Natural Language
Authors: Jiaqi Chen; Richard Antonello; Kaavya Chaparala; Coen Arrow; Nima Mesgarani
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: Although functional specialization in the brain - a phenomenon where different regions process different types of information - is well documented, we still lack precise mathematical methods with which to measure it. This work proposes a technique to quantify how brain regions respond to distinct categories of information. Using a topic encoding model, we identify brain regions that respond strongly to specific semantic categories while responding minimally to all others. We then use a language model to characterize the common themes across each region’s preferred categories. Our technique successfully identifies previously known functionally selective regions and reveals consistent patterns across subjects while also highlighting new areas of high specialization worthy of further study.
“Is There Anything Else?”: Examining Administrator Influence on Linguistic Features from the Cookie Theft Picture Description Cognitive Test
Authors: Changye Li; Zhecheng Sheng; Trevor Cohen; Serguei V. S. Pakhomov
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) dementia is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that negatively impacts patients’ cognitive ability. Previous studies have demonstrated that changes in naturalistic language samples can be useful for early screening of AD dementia. However, the nature of language deficits often requires test administrators to use various speech elicitation techniques during spontaneous language assessments to obtain enough propositional utterances from dementia patients. This could lead to the “observer’s effect” on the downstream analysis that has not been fully investigated. Our study seeks to quantify the influence of test administrators on linguistic features in dementia assessment with two English corpora the “Cookie Theft” picture description datasets collected at different locations and test administrators show different levels of administrator involvement. Our results show that the level of test administrator involvement significantly impacts observed linguistic features in patient speech. These results suggest that many of significant linguistic features in the downstream classification task may be partially attributable to differences in the test administration practices rather than solely to participants’ cognitive status. The variations in test administrator behavior can lead to systematic biases in linguistic data, potentially confounding research outcomes and clinical assessments. Our study suggests that there is a need for a more standardized test administration protocol in the development of responsible clinical speech analytics frameworks.
Cross-Framework Generalizable Discourse Relation Classification Through Cognitive Dimensions
Authors: Yingxue Fu
Venue: NAACL 2025 (Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics)

Abstract: Existing discourse corpora annotated under different frameworks adopt distinct but somewhat related taxonomies of relations. How to integrate discourse frameworks has been an open research question. Previous studies on this topic are mainly theoretical, although such research is typically performed with the hope of benefiting computational applications. In this paper, we show how the proposal by Sanders et al. (2018) based on the Cognitive approach to Coherence Relations (CCR) (Sanders et al.,1992, 1993) can be used effectively to facilitate cross-framework discourse relation (DR) classification. To address the challenges of using predicted UDims for DR classification, we adopt the Bayesian learning framework based on Monte Carlo dropout (Gal and Ghahramani, 2016) to obtain more robust predictions. Data augmentation enabled by our proposed method yields strong performance (55.75 for RST and 55.01 for PDTB implicit DR classification in macro-averaged F1). We compare four model designs and analyze the experimental results from different perspectives. Our study shows an effective and cross-framework generalizable approach for DR classification, filling a gap in existing studies.