Tex. Utilities Code § 41.061 — TX Code / Code ut / Chapter 41 / Section 41.061
§ 41.061. RETAIL RATE CHANGES BY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES.
Status: in_force

(a) This section shall apply to retail rates of an electric cooperative that has not adopted customer choice and to the retail delivery rates of an electric cooperative that has adopted customer choice. This section may not apply to rates for:

(1) sales of electric energy by an electric cooperative that has adopted customer choice; or

(2) wholesale sales of electric energy.

(b) An electric cooperative may change its rates by:

(1) adopting a resolution approving the proposed change;

(2) mailing notice of the proposed change to each affected customer whose rate would be increased by the proposed change at least 30 days before implementation of the proposed change, which notice may be included in a monthly billing; and

(3) holding a meeting to discuss the proposed rate changes with affected customers, if any change is expected to increase total system annual revenues by more than $100,000 or one percent, whichever is greater.

(c) An electric cooperative may implement the proposed rates on completion of the requirements under Subsection (b), and those rates shall remain in effect until changed by the electric cooperative as provided by this section or, for rates other than retail delivery rates, until this section is no longer applicable because the electric cooperative adopts customer choice.

(d) The electric cooperative may reconsider a rate change at any time and adjust the rate by board resolution without additional notice or meeting of customers if the rate as adjusted is not expected to increase the revenues from a customer class. However, if notice is given to a customer class that would receive an increase as a result of the adjustment, then the rates for the customer class may be increased without additional meeting of the customers. A customer may petition to appeal within the time provided in Subsection (f).

(e) Retail rates set by an electric cooperative that has not adopted customer choice and retail delivery rates set by an electric cooperative that has adopted customer choice shall be just and reasonable, not unreasonably preferential, prejudicial, or discriminatory; provided, however, if the customer agrees, an electric cooperative may charge a market-based rate to customers who have energy supply options if rates are not increased for other customers as a result.

(f) A customer of the electric cooperative who is adversely affected by a rate setting resolution of the electric cooperative is entitled to judicial review. A person initiates judicial review by filing a petition in the district court of Travis County not later than the 90th day after the resolution is implemented.

(g) The resolution of the electric cooperative setting rates, as it may have been amended as described in Subsection (d), shall be presumed valid, and the burden of showing that the resolution is invalid rests on the persons challenging the resolution. A court reviewing a change of a rate or rates by an electric cooperative may consider any relevant factor including the cost of providing service.

(h) If the court finds that the electric cooperative's resolution setting rates violates the standards contained in Subsection (e), or that the electric cooperative's rate violates Subsection (e), the court shall enter an order:

(1) stating the specific basis for its determination that the rates set in the electric cooperative's resolution violate Subsection (e); and

(2) directing the electric cooperative to:

(A) set, within 60 days, revised retail rates that do not violate the standards of Subsection (e); and

(B) refund or credit against future bills, at the electric cooperative's option, revenues collected under the rate found to violate the standards of Subsection (e) that exceed the revenues that would have been collected under the revised rates. The refund or credit shall be made over a period of not more than 12 months, as determined by the court.

(i) The court may not enter an order delaying or prohibiting implementation of a rate change or set revised rates either for the period the challenged resolution was in effect or prospectively.

(j) A person having obtained an order of the court requiring an electric cooperative to set revised retail rates pursuant to Subsection (h)(2)(A) may, once the order is no longer subject to appeal, initiate an original proceeding in the district court of Travis County either to:

(1) seek enforcement of the court's order by writ of mandamus if the electric cooperative has failed to adopt a resolution approving revised rates within the time prescribed; or

(2) seek judicial review of the electric cooperative's most current resolution setting rates as provided in this section, if the electric cooperative has set revised rates pursuant to the order of the court within the time prescribed. In the event of such enforcement proceeding or judicial review the court may, in addition to the other remedies provided for in this section, award reasonable costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, to the party prevailing on the case as a whole. Additionally, if the court finds that either party has acted in bad faith solely for the purpose of perpetuating the rate dispute between the parties, the court may impose sanctions on the offending party in accordance with the provisions of Subsections (b), (c), and (e), Section 10.004, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

(k) An electric cooperative that has not adopted customer choice and that has not changed each of its nonresidential rates since January 1, 1999, shall, on or before May 1, 2002, adopt a resolution setting rates. The resolution shall be subject to judicial review as provided in this section whether or not any rate is changed. In the event the electric cooperative fails to adopt a resolution setting rates pursuant to this subsection, a customer may petition for judicial review of the electric cooperative's rates. A person initiates judicial review by filing a petition in the district court of Travis County not later than November 1, 2002.