FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. MDW Law § 282-A — New York Code / Act MDW / Article 7-C / Section 282-A
Applications for coverage of interim multiple dwellings and residential units
Status: in_force

§ 282-a. Applications for coverage of interim multiple dwellings and\nresidential units. 1. Where any occupant has filed an application for\ncoverage pursuant to this article and has received a docket number from\nthe loft board, it shall be unlawful for an owner to cause or intend to\ncause such occupant to vacate, surrender or waive any rights in relation\nto such occupancy, due to repeated interruptions or discontinuances of\nessential services, or an interruption or discontinuance of an essential\nservice for an extended duration or of such significance as to\nsubstantially impair habitability of such unit, at any time before the\nloft board has made a final determination, including appeals, to approve\nor deny such application. This section shall not grant any rights of\ncontinued occupancy other than those otherwise granted by law. Any\nagreement that waives or limits the benefits of this section shall be\ndeemed void as against public policy. In addition to any other remedies\nprovided in this article for failure to be in compliance, in article\neight of this chapter, or in the regulations promulgated by the loft\nboard, an occupant who has filed an application with the loft board for\ncoverage under this article may commence an action or proceeding in a\ncourt of competent jurisdiction, which notwithstanding any other\nprovision of law shall include the housing part of the New York city\ncivil court, to enforce the provisions of this section.\n  2. It shall be unlawful for any owner to interrupt, deny, or\ndiscontinue essential services, or to impair the habitability of an\ninterim multiple dwelling unit or building. In addition to any remedies\nprovided under this article, regulations promulgated by the loft board,\nor any other law or regulation governing the housing standards, any\noccupant of an interim multiple dwelling may commence an action or\nproceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction which, notwithstanding\nany other provision of law, shall include the housing part of the New\nYork city civil court, to enforce the provisions of this section. Any\nagreement that waives or limits the benefits of this section shall be\ndeemed void as against public policy.\n
N.Y. RSS Law § 900 — New York Code / Act RSS / Article 19 / Section 900
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 900. Definitions. The following words and phrases as used in this\narticle shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning is\nplainly required by the context:\n  a. "Retirement system" shall mean the New York state and local\nemployees' retirement system and the New York state teachers' retirement\nsystem.\n  b. "State employer" shall mean the executive branch of the state, the\nsenate, the assembly and joint legislative employers.\n  c. "Participating employer" shall mean an employer, other than a state\nemployer, which participates in a retirement system.\n  d. "Eligible employee", subject to the limitations of section nine\nhundred two of this article, shall mean a member of a retirement system\nwho is identified as eligible to receive the benefit enhancements\nprovided for in this article upon election by a state employer pursuant\nto section nine hundred one of this article; "eligible employee" of a\nparticipating employer shall mean all employees, subject to the\nlimitations of section nine hundred two of this article. Notwithstanding\nany other provision of law to the contrary, the benefits provided herein\nshall only apply to an eligible employee who is a member of a retirement\nsystem as defined by subdivision a of this section.\n  e. "Active service" shall mean (i) service while being paid on the\npayroll; (ii) a leave of absence with pay; (iii) other approved leave\nwithout pay; and (iv) any period of time between school terms and any\ntime between September first, two thousand and October first, two\nthousand for a teacher or other employee employed on a school-year\nbasis.\n  f. "Cessation date" shall mean the beginning date of an eligible\nemployee's first payroll period commencing on or after October first,\ntwo thousand, or the effective date as of which such employee becomes\neligible for the benefits contained in subdivision b of section nine\nhundred two of this article, or the date on which the eligible employee\nattains ten years of membership or, if earlier, ten years of credited\nservice, whichever is latest.\n
N.Y. PAR Law § 5.09 — New York Code / Act PAR / Title B / Article 5 / Section 5.09
Powers, functions and duties
Status: in_force

§ 5.09 Powers, functions and duties. The council shall:\n  1. Review the policy, budget and statewide plans of the department,\nand make appropriate recommendations regarding their amendment or\nadoption.\n  2. Submit reports to the governor, not less than once each year,\nconcerning progress in the area of state parks, recreation and historic\npreservation, including recommendations for the future, and covering\nsuch other matters as the council may deem appropriate.\n  3. Act as a central advisory agency on all matters affecting parks,\nrecreation and historic preservation.\n  4. Recommend, from among its members and for the governor's\nconsideration, a chairman and vice-chairman.\n  5. Adopt such by-laws as may be required for the organization of the\ncouncil and the conduct of its affairs.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 4607 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 46 / Section 4607
Exemption from taxation; trusts; higher education loans
Status: in_force

§ 4607. Exemption from taxation; trusts; higher education loans. (a)\nThe property of a system, the portion of wages or salary of an employee\ndeducted or to be deducted, the right of an employee to a pension\nbenefit, and all his rights in the funds of the system, shall be exempt\nfrom taxation and from the operation of any law relating to bankruptcy\nor insolvency, except as provided in section four thousand six hundred\neight of this article and subject to the provisions of section three\nthousand two hundred twelve of this chapter.\n  (b) No trust created pursuant to this article shall be deemed invalid\nas violating any existing laws against perpetuities or suspension of the\npower of alienation of title to property; and the income arising from\nany property, real or personal, held in such trust may be permitted to\naccumulate until the fund shall be sufficient in the opinion of its\ntrustee or trustees to accomplish the purposes of such trust.\n  (c) Any system may lend money to any of its participating employees or\ntheir children, who are attending or planning to attend college, to\nassist them in meeting their expenses of higher education, where such\nloans are guaranteed by the New York higher education services\ncorporation in accordance with the provisions of article fourteen of the\neducation law. In such cases no further security for the repayment of\nsuch loans shall be required of the borrowers by such system.\n
N.Y. BSW Law § 24 — New York Code / Act BSW / Section 24
Rings
Status: in_force

* § 24. Rings. No boxing contest or exhibition or training activity\nshall be permitted in any ring unless such ring has been inspected and\napproved by the commission. The commission shall prescribe standard\nacceptable size and quality requirements for rings and appurtenances\nthereto.\n  * NB Repealed September 1, 2016\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 474 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 4 / Part 7 / Section 474
Default
Status: in_force

§ 474. Default. A default in the terms of the order shall constitute a\nbreach of the undertaking. When there has been a default the court shall\ncause an affidavit to be drawn, verified and filed by any person\nfamiliar with the facts. The surety shall thereupon be personally\nserved, or served by registered mail at the address given in the\nundertaking or subsequent address furnished by said surety in writing,\nwith notice of such default and shall be required to attend at the court\non a day certain and show cause why judgment should not be entered on\nthe undertaking and the amount thereof applied to the relief of the\npetitioner for the amount in default. If the surety appears and pays the\namount in arrears the court may remit the forfeiture. Inability to serve\nthe surety shall not be prejudicial to the renewal of proceedings\nagainst the respondent.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 342-BB*5 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 342-BB*5
Portion of state highway system to be designated as "The Fort Drum Military Highway"
Status: in_force

* § 342-bb. Portion of state highway system to be designated as "The\nFort Drum Military Highway". That portion of state route three in\nJefferson county, beginning at route twelve and continuing north to the\nJefferson - Lewis county border shall be designated as "The Fort Drum\nMilitary Highway".\n  * NB There are 5 § 342-bb's\n
N.Y. RPA Law § 1320 — New York Code / Act RPA / Article 13 / Section 1320
Special summons requirement in private residence cases
Status: in_force

§ 1320. Special summons requirement in private residence cases. In an\naction to foreclose a mortgage on a residential property containing not\nmore than three units, in addition to the usual requirements applicable\nto a summons in the court, the summons shall contain a notice in\nboldface in the following form:\n                                  NOTICE\n                  YOU ARE IN DANGER OF LOSING YOUR HOME\n  If you do not respond to this summons and complaint by serving a copy\nof the answer on the attorney for the mortgage company who filed this\nforeclosure proceeding against you and filing the answer with the court,\na default judgment may be entered and you can lose your home.\n  Speak to an attorney or go to the court where your case is pending for\nfurther information on how to answer the summons and protect your\nproperty.\n  Sending a payment to your mortgage company will not stop this\nforeclosure action.\n  YOU MUST RESPOND BY SERVING A COPY OF THE ANSWER ON THE ATTORNEY FOR\nTHE PLAINTIFF (MORTGAGE COMPANY) AND FILING THE ANSWER WITH THE COURT.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 359-A — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 23-A / Section 359-A
Appointment of deputies
Status: in_force

§ 359-a. Appointment of deputies. For the purposes of this article,\nthe attorney-general may in his discretion, and without civil service\nexamination, appoint and employ, and at pleasure remove, such deputies,\nofficers and other persons as he deems necessary, and determine their\nduties and fix their compensation.\n
N.Y. WKC Law § 87-E — New York Code / Act WKC / Article 6 / Section 87-E
Amortization of gains or losses
Status: in_force

§ 87-e. Amortization of gains or losses. Gains or losses realized by\nthe state insurance fund as a result of sales or dispositions pursuant\nto the authorization and direction of section eighty-seven-a,\neighty-seven-b, eighty-seven-bb, eighty-seven-c, or eighty-seven-f of\nthis chapter shall be transferred to a special asset account to be known\nas the deferred charge on account of security exchanges and shall be\namortized within such account on a basis which matches as nearly as\npossible all gains or losses so realized against any increase or\ndecrease in income resulting from the reinvestment of the proceeds of\nsuch sales or dispositions, provided that the period of amortization of\nthe gain or loss resulting from the sale or disposition of each\ninvestment shall not be longer than the unexpired period from the date\nof such sale or disposition to the maturity of the investment so sold or\ndisposed of, or on such other basis as the superintendent of financial\nservices may authorize in his discretion.\n
N.Y. UJC Law § 2203 — New York Code / Act UJC / Article 22 / Section 2203
Cases carried over
Status: in_force

§ 2203. Cases carried over.\n  All actions and proceedings pending in any court to which this act\napplies, at the time this act takes effect, shall remain in the court\nand shall be governed by the following subdivisions of this section.\n  (a) No such action or proceeding, or appeal taken therein, shall abate\nby virtue of the application of this act to the court.\n  (b) For the purpose of the disposition of such pending action or\nproceeding only, the jurisdiction of the court shall be deemed expanded\nto that of the court under provisions applicable prior to the effective\ndate of this act whenever necessary to sustain the jurisdiction of the\ncourt over such action or proceeding if the court had jurisdiction of\nthe same under such provisions.\n  (c) Except as provided for in the foregoing, practice and procedure in\nsuch actions and proceedings shall be as if the same were instituted\nafter the effective date of this act. But if the court shall find that a\npractice or procedure available prior to the effective date of this act,\nbut unavailable after such effective date, is necessary to the\ndisposition of such action or proceeding, the court may permit recourse\nto or completion of the same.\n
N.Y. VIL Law § 14-1408 — New York Code / Act VIL / Article 14 / Section 14-1408
Establishment or enlargement of sewage treatment plant
Status: in_force

§ 14-1408 Establishment or enlargement of sewage treatment plant.  The\nboard of trustees of any village may establish a sewage treatment plant\nor enlarge or remodel an existing sewage treatment plant at the expense\nof the village by resolution adopted at a regular meeting. The\nresolution shall state the maximum amount to be expended for such work.\n
N.Y. ENV Law § 43-0125 — New York Code / Act ENV / Article 43 / Section 43-0125
Regulatory and user fees
Status: in_force

§ 43-0125. Regulatory and user fees.\n  1. The legislature finds that comprehensive environmental regulatory\nmanagement and conservation within the Lake George park are essential to\nprotect an important part of the environmental resources of the state\nand the public health and welfare. It further declares that regulated\nentities and users of the unique resources of Lake George park should\nbear a significant portion of the costs of regulation, management and\nconservation activities which assure the protection and continued\nbeneficial use of the resources of the park.\n  2. The following annual fees to be paid to the commission are hereby\nestablished:\n  (a) Dock, wharf and mooring fees. The owner of a dock, wharf or\nmooring within the park used for non-commercial residential purposes\nshall pay an annual fee of fifty dollars. The owner of a dock or wharf\nwithin the park used for commercial purposes shall pay an annual fee of\nfive dollars per linear foot for each such dock. The owner of a mooring\nused for commercial purposes shall pay an annual fee of one hundred\ndollars for each mooring. New docks constructed for commercial use after\nthe effective date of this section shall pay a first time fee of ten\ndollars per linear foot and five dollars per linear foot annually\nthereafter.\n  (b) Boat fees. In addition to the registration required by the state,\nany mechanically propelled boat or vessel with ten horsepower or more\nused on Lake George shall have an annual permit issued by the\ncommission. The fee therefor for boats twenty feet or less in length\noverall shall be forty dollars; for boats twenty-one to twenty-five feet\nin length overall, fifty dollars; and for boats over twenty-five feet in\nlength overall, fifty dollars plus seven dollars and fifty cents for\neach foot by which the length overall exceeds twenty-five feet; for\nboats over twenty-five feet in length overall outfitted for overnight\nuse, fifty dollars plus thirty dollars for each foot by which the\noverall length exceeds twenty-five feet. The commission may establish a\none week use permit for twenty dollars. The commission may establish a\none day use permit for twelve dollars for any mechanically propelled\nboat or vessel with ten horsepower or more.\n  3. The commission may charge a fee to an applicant for a permit in\norder to recover the costs incurred in reviewing and acting upon an\napplication for such permit.\n  4. Except as otherwise provided by law, all fees collected pursuant to\nthis section shall be deposited to the credit of the Lake George park\ntrust fund pursuant to section ninety-seven-h of the state finance law.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 109 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 9 / Section 109
Delivery of goods without obtaining negotiable warehouse receipt
Status: in_force

§ 109. Delivery of goods without obtaining negotiable warehouse\nreceipt.  A warehouseman, or any officer, agent or servant of a\nwarehouseman who delivers goods out of the possession of such\nwarehouseman, knowing that a negotiable warehouse receipt the\nnegotiation of which would transfer the right to the possession of such\ngoods is outstanding and uncanceled, without obtaining the possession of\nsuch negotiable warehouse receipt at or before the time of such\ndelivery, shall, except in the cases provided for in sections 7-210 and\n7-601 of the uniform commercial code or if the goods have been lawfully\nsold or disposed of because of their perishable or hazardous nature, be\nguilty of a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 456 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 4 / Part 5 / Section 456
Probation
Status: in_force

§ 456. Probation. (a) No person may be placed on probation under this\narticle unless the court makes an order to that effect, either at the\ntime of the making of an order of support or under section four hundred\nfifty-four. The period of probation may continue so long as an order of\nsupport, order of protection or order of visitation applies to such\nperson.\n  (b) The court may at any time, where circumstances warrant it, revoke\nan order of probation. Upon such revocation, the probationer shall be\nbrought to court, which may, without further hearing, make any order\nthat might have been made at the time the order of probation was made.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 1072 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 10 / Part 7 / Section 1072
Failure to comply with terms and conditions of supervision
Status: in_force

§ 1072. Failure to comply with terms and conditions of supervision.\nIf, prior to the expiration of the period of an order of supervision\npursuant to section one thousand fifty-four or one thousand fifty-seven\nof this article, a motion or order to show cause is filed that alleges\nthat a parent or other person legally responsible for a child's care\nviolated the terms and conditions of an order of supervision issued\nunder section one thousand fifty-four or one thousand fifty-seven of\nthis article, the period of the order of supervision shall be tolled\npending disposition of the motion or order to show cause. If, after\nhearing, the court is satisfied by competent proof that the parent or\nother person violated the order of supervision willfully and without\njust cause, the court may:\n  (a) revoke the order of supervision or of protection and enter any\norder that might have been made at the time the order of supervision or\nof protection was made, or\n  (b) commit the parent or other person who willfully and without just\ncause violated the order to jail for a term not to exceed six months.\n
N.Y. NPC Law § 502 — New York Code / Act NPC / Article 5 / Section 502
Members' capital contributions
Status: in_force

§ 502. Members' capital contributions.\n  (a) The certificate of incorporation may provide that members, upon or\nsubsequent to admission, shall make capital contributions in the amount\nspecified therein. The requirement of a capital contribution may apply\nto all members, or to the members of a single class, or to members of\ndifferent classes in different amounts or proportions.\n  (b) A member's capital contribution shall consist of money or other\nproperty, tangible or intangible, or labor or services actually received\nby or performed for the corporation or for its benefit or in its\nformation or reorganization, or a combination thereof. In the absence of\nfraud in the transaction, the judgment of the board as to the value of\nthe consideration received by the corporation shall be conclusive.\n  (c) Neither obligations of the member for future payments nor future\nservices shall constitute payment or part payment of a member's capital\ncontribution.\n  (d) A member's capital contribution shall be evidenced by a capital\ncertificate which shall be non-transferable, except that the certificate\nof incorporation of a non-charitable corporation may provide that its\ncapital certificates, or some of them, may be transferable to other\nmembers with the consent of the corporation upon specified terms and\nconditions.\n  (e) A member's capital contribution shall not be repaid or redeemed by\nthe corporation except upon dissolution of the corporation or upon\nredemption of the capital certificate as provided in this chapter. A\ncorporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that its\ncapital certificates, or some of them, shall be redeemable, in whole or\nin part, at the option of the corporation only, at such price or prices\n(not to exceed the amount of the capital contribution), within such\nperiod or periods, and on such terms and conditions, not inconsistent\nwith this chapter, as are stated in the certificate of incorporation.\n
N.Y. BSC Law § 706 — New York Code / Act BSC / Article 7 / Section 706
Removal of directors
Status: in_force

§ 706. Removal of directors.\n  (a) Any or all of the directors may be removed for cause by vote of\nthe shareholders. The certificate of incorporation or the specific\nprovisions of a by-law adopted by the shareholders may provide for such\nremoval by action of the board, except in the case of any director\nelected by cumulative voting, or by the holders of the shares of any\nclass or series, or holders of bonds, voting as a class, when so\nentitled by the provisions of the certificate of incorporation.\n  (b) If the certificate of incorporation or the by-laws so provide, any\nor all of the directors may be removed without cause by vote of the\nshareholders.\n  (c) The removal of directors, with or without cause, as provided in\nparagraphs (a) and (b) is subject to the following:\n  (1) In the case of a corporation having cumulative voting, no director\nmay be removed when the votes cast against his removal would be\nsufficient to elect him if voted cumulatively at an election at which\nthe same total number of votes were cast and the entire board, or the\nentire class of directors of which he is a member, were then being\nelected; and\n  (2) When by the provisions of the certificate of incorporation the\nholders of the shares of any class or series, or holders of bonds,\nvoting as a class, are entitled to elect one or more directors, any\ndirector so elected may be removed only by the applicable vote of the\nholders of the shares of that class or series, or the holders of such\nbonds, voting as a class.\n  (d) An action to procure a judgment removing a director for cause may\nbe brought by the attorney-general or by the holders of ten percent of\nthe outstanding shares, whether or not entitled to vote. The court may\nbar from re-election any director so removed for a period fixed by the\ncourt.\n