FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. BNK Law § 436 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 10-B / Section 436
Restrictions on powers
Status: in_force

§ 436. Restrictions on powers. The savings and loan bank shall not: 1.\nDo a general deposit business except with its members.\n  2. Invest more than twenty-five per centum of its surplus account in\nreal estate occupied, or to be occupied, by it as a place of business,\nwithout the written approval of the superintendent.\n  3. Incur any indebtedness, except for the purpose of making loans to\nits members or purchasing from its members those investments made by\nthem under article ten of this chapter, upon any bonds or notes, secured\nor unsecured, with a maturity exceeding three years or in an aggregate\namount exceeding five times its capital.\n  4. Incur any indebtedness upon bonds or notes, secured or unsecured,\nfor the purpose of making loans to its members unless the amount of any\nsuch bonds or notes which are secured shall not be in excess of eighty\nper centum of the value of the collateral security pledged therefor to\nsuch savings and loan bank; and any such bonds or notes which are\nunsecured shall not have a maturity in excess of three years.\n  5. Purchase from its members mortgage loans which were originated less\nthan five years prior to date of such purchase, nor incur indebtedness\nfor the purchase from its members of mortgage loans which were\noriginated five years or more prior to the date of such purchase by the\nissuance of bonds or notes, secured or unsecured, with a maturity\nexceeding five years.\n
N.Y. PEP Law § 288 — New York Code / Act PEP / Article 8-B / Section 288
Judgment
Status: in_force

§ 288. Judgment. If the court shall be satisfied that the allegations\nof the petition are true, and that the interests of the bondholders of\nthe issue as a whole will not be adversely affected by the granting of\nthe application, it shall enter judgment directing the trustee, every\nobligor, any receiver appointed by a court, depositary or committee\npurporting to act for or on behalf of bondholders, or such of them as\nmay have been duly served, to furnish to the applicant a list of the\nnames and addresses of all bondholders of the issue so far as they\nrespectively have knowledge or information with respect to the same.\nSuch judgment may contain such terms and conditions as the court may\ndeem proper with respect to the time when and place where such lists are\nto be furnished, and the payment of the expense of furnishing same.\nNotwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, however, if a\ndefault was the basis of the application and such default has been cured\nbefore the entry of judgment, or if the institution of proceedings was\nthe basis of the application and such proceedings have finally\nterminated before the entry of judgment, the proceeding may, in the\ndiscretion of the court, be dismissed.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 80.15 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 2 / Title E / Article 80 / Section 80.15
Multiple offenses
Status: in_force

§ 80.15 Multiple offenses.\n  Where a person is convicted of two or more offenses committed through\na single act or omission, or through an act or omission which in itself\nconstituted one of the offenses and also was a material element of the\nother, and the court imposes a sentence of imprisonment or a fine or\nboth for one of the offenses, a fine shall not be imposed for the other.\nThe provisions of this section shall not apply to any offense or\noffenses set forth in the vehicle and traffic law.\n
N.Y. STT Law § 302 — New York Code / Act STT / Article 3 / Section 302
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 302. Definitions. For the purpose of this article:\n  1. "Electronic" shall mean of or relating to technology having\nelectrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electromagnetic, or\nsimilar capabilities.\n  2. "Electronic record" shall mean information, evidencing any act,\ntransaction, occurrence, event, or other activity, produced or stored by\nelectronic means and capable of being accurately reproduced in forms\nperceptible by human sensory capabilities.\n  3. "Electronic signature" shall mean an electronic sound, symbol, or\nprocess, attached to or logically associated with an electronic record\nand executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.\n  4. "Person" shall mean a natural person, corporation, trust, estate,\npartnership, incorporated or unincorporated association or any other\nlegal entity, and also includes any department, agency, authority, or\ninstrumentality of the state or its political subdivisions.\n  5. "Governmental entity" shall mean any state department, board,\nbureau, division, commission, committee, public authority, public\nbenefit corporation, council, office, or other governmental entity or\nofficer of the state having statewide authority, except the state\nlegislature, and any political subdivision of the state.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 224 — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 8 / Section 224
Contracting for public work; enforcement
Status: in_force

§ 224. Contracting for public work; enforcement. 1. The commissioner\nshall have the power to enforce any provision of law requiring the\npreparation of separate specifications for public work contracts.\nWhenever the commissioner determines that an agency, board, department,\ncommission or officer of the state of New York, or of any political\nsubdivision thereof as defined in section one hundred of the general\nmunicipal law, municipal corporation as defined in section sixty-six of\nthe general construction law, public benefit corporation, or local or\nstate authority as defined in section two of the public authorities law\nhaving jurisdiction over a public work contract for which the\npreparation of separate specifications is required has failed to prepare\nsuch separate specifications, the commissioner may issue a stop-bid\norder, which shall take effect as to such public work bid or contract\nwhen served upon such agency, board, department, commission or officer\nof the state of New York, political subdivision, municipal corporation,\npublic benefit corporation or local or state authority. Such stop-bid\norder shall be served by regular mail, and a second copy may be served\nby telefacsimile or by electronic mail, with service effective upon\nreceipt of any of such notices. The order shall remain in effect until\nthe commissioner directs that the stop-bid order be removed, upon a\ndetermination that the agency, board, department, commission or officer\nof the state of New York, political subdivision, municipal corporation,\npublic benefit corporation or local or state authority has complied with\nthe separate specifications requirement. The agency, board, department,\ncommission or officer of the state of New York, political subdivision,\nmunicipal corporation, public benefit corporation or local or state\nauthority may within thirty days after notice of the stop-bid order make\nan application in affidavit form for a redetermination review of such\norder. The commissioner shall make a decision in writing on the issues\nraised in such application within thirty days of receipt of such\napplication.\n  2. The commissioner may file a complaint in the supreme court of any\ncounty where venue is proper to enjoin any agency, board, department,\ncommission or officer of the state of New York, political subdivision,\nmunicipal corporation, public benefit corporation or local or state\nauthority from violating a stop-bid order. In any action brought by the\ncommissioner pursuant to this section in which it prevails, the court\nmay award costs, including the reasonable costs of investigation and\nreasonable attorneys' fees.\n  3. In any court proceedings under this section, the commissioner shall\nbe represented by the attorney general.\n
N.Y. DPN Law § 17 — New York Code / Act DPN / Section 17
All actions and proceedings to which the port authority may be a party and in which any question arises under the laws relating to the po...
Status: in_force

§ 17. All actions and proceedings to which the port authority may be a\nparty and in which any question arises under the laws relating to the\nport authority, or under or concerning any of its orders or actions,\nshall be preferred over all other civil causes, except election causes,\nin all courts of this state and shall be heard and determined in\npreference to all other civil business pending therein, except election\ncauses, irrespective of position on the calendar. The same preference\nshall be granted upon application of the legal representative of the\nport authority, in any action or proceeding in which he may be allowed\nto intervene.\n
N.Y. EPT Law § 10-6.2 — New York Code / Act EPT / Article 10 / Part 6 / Section 10-6.2
Exercise of a power of appointment; conformity to directions of
Status: in_force

§ 10-6.2 Exercise of a power of appointment; conformity to directions of\n           donor\n  (a) Subject to the power of a court of competent jurisdiction to\nremedy a defective execution of an imperative power of appointment, the\ndirections of the donor as to the manner, time and conditions of the\nexercise of a power must be observed, except that:\n  (1) Where the donor has authorized it to be exercised by an instrument\nlegally insufficient to dispose of the appointive property, the manner\nof exercise is to be determined by the provisions of this article.\n  (2) Where the donor has directed any formality to be observed in its\nexercise, in addition to those which would be legally sufficient to\ndispose of the appointive property, such additional formality is not\nnecessary to a valid exercise of such power.\n  (3) Where the donor has made the power exercisable only by deed, it is\nalso exercisable by a written will unless exercise by will is expressly\nexcluded.\n  (4) Where the donor of a general power of appointment has not\nexpressly imposed a requirement of good faith or of reasonableness with\nrespect to the donee's exercise of such power, neither such requirement\nshall be implied.\n
N.Y. PVH Law § 22-B — New York Code / Act PVH / Article 2 / Section 22-B
Loans for state-aided limited-profit housing companies
Status: in_force

§ 22-b. Loans for state-aided limited-profit housing companies. 1.\nNotwithstanding any provision of this article to the contrary, the\ncommissioner may for a period of one year from the effective date of\nthis act approve a loan and encumbrance in excess of the actual project\ncost of a state-aided project comprising more than five thousand rental\nunits, provided that: (a) the rents paid by the tenants may not be\nincreased to pay for any consequent increase in indebtedness that is not\nattributable to project cost; (b) the company enters into an agreement\nto continue to remain subject to the provisions of this article for a\nperiod of no less than an additional thirty years from issuance of the\nloan and encumbrance; and (c) the greater of twenty-five percent of the\namount of such loan which exceeds such actual project cost or forty\nmillion dollars of the proceeds of such loan must be dedicated to\ncapital improvements to existing structures and facilities.\n  2. Any company that enters into a loan pursuant to subdivision one of\nthis section shall create a plan within one year of the approval of the\nloan. The plan shall include details of all capital improvements that\nwill occur as a result of the loan. Such company shall obligate the\nfunds dedicated to the capital improvements within three years of the\napproval of the loan. Such company shall submit a copy of the plan\nwithin one year of the approval of the loan and within three years of\nthe approval of the loan, a report that details the use of the loan\nfunds to the governor, the commissioner of the division of housing and\ncommunity renewal, the temporary president of the senate, the speaker of\nthe assembly, the minority leader of the senate, the minority leader of\nthe assembly, the chair of the senate finance committee, the chair of\nthe assembly ways and means committee, the chair of the senate housing,\nconstruction, and community development committee, and the chair of the\nassembly housing committee.\n  3. Such company shall participate in bimonthly meetings with elected\nofficials and the members of the project's residents' association or\nother tenant organization that represents the majority of tenants in the\nproject in order to hear any advice or comments on the implementation of\nthe plan. The meetings shall occur on a regular basis until all of the\nmoney set-aside for capital improvements in subdivision one of this\nsection has been spent.\n
N.Y. CVR Law § 80-A — New York Code / Act CVR / Article 8 / Section 80-A
Causes of action for alienation of affections, criminal conversation, seduction and breach of contract to marry abolished
Status: in_force

§ 80-a. Causes of action for alienation of affections, criminal\nconversation, seduction and breach of contract to marry abolished. The\nrights of action to recover sums of money as damages for alienation of\naffections, criminal conversation, seduction, or breach of contract to\nmarry are abolished. No act done within this state shall operate to give\nrise, either within or without this state, to any such right of action.\nNo contract to marry made or entered into in this state shall operate to\ngive rise, either within or without this state, to any cause or right of\naction for its breach.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 1438-M — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 31-A-1 / Section 1438-M
Apportionment
Status: in_force

* § 1438-m. Apportionment. A local law adopted by the town of Red\nHook, pursuant to this article, shall provide for a method of\napportionment for determining the amount of tax due whenever the real\nproperty or interest therein is situated within and without the town.\n  * NB Repealed December 31, 2026\n
N.Y. PBL Law § 37 — New York Code / Act PBL / Article 3 / Section 37
Collection, forfeiture and cancellation of purchase-money bonds
Status: in_force

§ 37. Collection, forfeiture and cancellation of purchase-money bonds.\nThe commissioner of general services may direct the comptroller to sue\nupon any bond heretofore received by the office of general services or\nits predecessors including the state engineer, the commissioner of\ntransportation or the secretary of state on the sale of unappropriated\nstate lands, if any payment stipulated in such bond shall remain due one\nyear, or the commissioner may direct the sale of the land for the\npayment of which such bond was given, and in case of such sale, all\nprevious payments made on account of such land shall be forfeited to the\npeople of the state, and the bonds may be delivered up and cancelled on\nthe surrender of the certificates of sale.\n
N.Y. ACA Law § 33.11 — New York Code / Act ACA / Title K / Article 33 / Section 33.11
Refilling or selling trade-mark bottles and vessels
Status: in_force

§ 33.11. Refilling or selling trade-mark bottles and vessels. Any\nperson engaged in making, bottling, packing, selling or disposing of\nmilk, ale, beer, cider, mineral water or other beverage, or in making,\nselling or disposing of articles of pastry, may register his title as\nowner of a trade-mark by filing with the secretary of state and the\nclerk of the county where the principal place of business of such person\nis situated, a description of the marks and devices used by him in his\nbusiness, and in case the same has not been heretofore published\naccording to the laws existing at the time of publication, causing the\nsame to be published in a newspaper of the county, three weeks daily, if\nin the city of New York or Brooklyn, and weekly if in any other part of\nthe state; but no trade-mark shall be filed which is not and can not\nbecome a lawful trade-mark, or which is merely the name of a person,\nfirm or corporation unaccompanied by a mark sufficient to distinguish it\nfrom the same name when used by another person. After such registration,\nthe use without the consent of the owner of the trade-mark so described,\nor the filling of any bottle, siphon, barrel, platter, vessel, or thing\nfor the purpose of sale, or for the sale, therein, of any article of the\nsame general nature and quality which said bottle, siphon, barrel,\nplatter, vessel or other thing before contained, without the\nobliteration or defacement of the trade-mark upon it, when such\ntrade-mark can be obliterated or defaced without substantial injury to\nthe bottle, siphon, barrel, platter, vessel or other thing so as to\nprevent its wrongful use, shall be deemed a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 209-E — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 9-A / Section 209-E
Gift for prostate and testicular cancer research and education
Status: in_force

§ 209-E. Gift for prostate and testicular cancer research and\neducation.  Effective for any tax year commencing on or after January\nfirst, two thousand four, a taxpayer in any taxable year may elect to\ncontribute to the support of the New York State prostate and testicular\ncancer research and education fund. Such contribution shall be in any\nwhole dollar amount and shall not reduce the amount of the state tax\nowed by such taxpayer. The commissioner shall include space on the\ncorporate income tax return to enable a taxpayer to make such\ncontribution.  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all revenues\ncollected pursuant to this section shall be credited to the New York\nState prostate and testicular cancer research and education fund and\nshall be used only for those purposes enumerated in section\nninety-five-e of the state finance law.\n
N.Y. MHY Law § 9.64 — New York Code / Act MHY / Title B / Article 9 / Section 9.64
Notice of admission determination to community provider
Status: in_force

§ 9.64 Notice of admission determination to community provider.\n  Upon an admission to a hospital or received as a patient in a\ncomprehensive psychiatric emergency program, the director of such\nhospital or program shall, in accordance with section 33.13 of this\nchapter, ensure that reasonable efforts are made to identify and\npromptly notify of such determination any community provider of mental\nhealth services that maintains such person on its caseload.\n
N.Y. CCA Law § 1809 — New York Code / Act CCA / Article 18 / Section 1809
Procedures relating to corporations, associations, insurers and assignees
Status: in_force

§ 1809. Procedures relating to corporations, associations, insurers\nand assignees. 1. No corporation, except a municipal corporation, public\nbenefit corporation, school district or school district public library\nwholly or partially within the municipal corporate limit, no\npartnership, or association and no assignee of any small claim shall\ninstitute an action or proceeding under this article, nor shall this\narticle apply to any claim or cause of action brought by an insurer in\nits own name or in the name of its insured whether before or after\npayment to the insured on the policy.\n  2. A corporation may appear in the defense of any small claim action\nbrought pursuant to this article by an attorney as well as by any\nauthorized officer, director or employee of the corporation provided\nthat the appearance by a non-lawyer on behalf of a corporation shall be\ndeemed to constitute the requisite authority to bind the corporation in\na settlement or trial. The court or arbitrator may make reasonable\ninquiry to determine the authority of any person who appears for the\ncorporation in defense of a small claims court case.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 29-K — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 2-B / Section 29-K
Northern emergency management assistance compact
Status: in_force

§ 29-k. Northern emergency management assistance compact.\nNotwithstanding any other law, the state, through the governor, may\nenter the northern emergency management assistance compact (P.L.\n112-282, ratified by Congress on January fourteenth, two thousand\nthirteen). Such compact shall be deemed ratified by the legislature upon\nthe governor's certification to the temporary president of the senate,\nthe speaker of the assembly, and the secretary of state, that New York\nhas entered into the compact.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 232 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 13-A / Section 232
Trade mark
Status: in_force

§ 232. Trade mark.  If there is any quality mark printed, stamped or\nbranded on the article itself there must also be printed, stamped or\nbranded on the said article itself the following mark, to wit: a trade\nmark duly applied for or registered under the laws of the United States\nof the manufacturer of such article; except that if such manufacturer\nhas sold or contracted to sell such article to a jobber, wholesaler or\nretail dealer regularly engaged in the business of buying and selling\nsimilar articles, this provision shall be deemed to be complied with if\nthere is so marked on the said article the trade mark duly registered\nunder the laws of the United States of such jobber, wholesaler or retail\ndealer respectively; and in such event there may also be marked on the\nsaid article itself numerals intended to identify the article, design or\npattern provided, however, that such numerals do not appear or purport\nto be a part of the quality mark and provided that they are not\ncalculated to mislead or deceive anyone into believing that they are\npartly of the quality mark.\n
N.Y. PML Law § 1004 — New York Code / Act PML / Article 10 / Section 1004
Suspension of simulcast licenses
Status: in_force

§ 1004. Suspension of simulcast licenses. 1. The commission may\nsuspend any license authorizing the operation of a facility as a\nsimulcast facility, granted to an operator, if such operator fails to\nconduct operations in accordance with the provisions of the plan of\noperation, with the applicable rules of the commission or with the\nprovisions of this article.\n  2. If the commission determines to suspend any license to operate a\nsimulcast facility, the commission shall give the operator involved\nnotice of the time and plan for a hearing before the commission at which\nthe commission will hear such operator in reference thereto. The\ncommission may continue such hearing from time to time for the\nconvenience of all parties. Any of the parties affected by such hearing\nmay be represented by counsel, and the commission may be represented by\nits own counsel or by the attorney general. In the conduct of such\nhearing the commission shall not be bound by technical rules of\nevidence, but all evidence offered before the commission shall be\nreduced to writing, and such evidence together with the exhibits, if\nany, and the findings of the commission shall be permanently preserved\nand shall constitute the record of the commission in such case. The\ncommission may by order, if occasion shall require, refer to one or more\nof its members or officers the duty of taking testimony in such matter\nand to report thereon to the commission, but no determination shall be\nmade thereon except by the commission. Within thirty days after such\nhearing, the commission shall make a final determination. If the\ncommission determines that such license be suspended, the commission\nshall make an order accordingly, and shall cause such order to be\nentered on its minutes and a copy thereof served on such operator. The\naction of the commission in suspending such license shall be reviewable\nin the supreme court in the manner provided by the provisions of article\nseventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules.\n  3. The commission may immediately suspend any license to operate a\nsimulcast facility for a reason set forth in subdivision one of this\nsection as of the delivery to the affected operator of the notice of\nhearing required by subdivision two of this section pending final\ndetermination of the commission following the hearing. Such emergency\nsuspension shall be followed by a hearing as provided in subdivision two\nof this section within twenty days following suspension.\n