FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. HAY Law § 60 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 3 / Section 60
Sprinkling; removal of filth and refuse
Status: in_force

§ 60. Sprinkling; removal of filth and refuse. Upon petition signed by\na majority of the taxpayers owning property abutting upon an improved\nstate highway and filed with the town clerk, the town board may set\naside any section of such highway outside of a village and contract for\nthe sprinkling of the roadbed with water and also contract for the\nremoval of filth and refuse therefrom. No such contract shall be entered\ninto unless previously approved by the county superintendent. The amount\nof any such contract so entered into shall be assessed upon the property\nabutting upon such section in the proportion which the frontage of each\nparcel thereof bears to the length of the section exclusive of\nintersecting highways. Such assessment shall be made, levied and\ncollected in the same general manner, and at the same time and by the\nsame officers as the town taxes of said town are assessed, levied and\ncollected.\n
N.Y. STT Law § 209 — New York Code / Act STT / Article 2 / Section 209
Notification of a breach of the security of the system or a breach of network security; shared data
Status: in_force

§ 209. Notification of a breach of the security of the system or a\nbreach of network security; shared data. 1. The office shall, within\ntwenty-four hours of either being notified of or receiving evidence of a\nbreach of the security of the system, or a breach of network security,\nas defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of subdivision three of this\nsection, notify the chief information officer, the chief information\nsecurity officer, and where appropriate, the cyber security coordinator\nof any state entity with which it shares data, provides networked\nservices or shares a network connection whose data, services or\nconnection is reasonably suspected to be affected by any such breach.\n  2. The office shall provide the chief information officer, the chief\ninformation security officer, and where appropriate, the cyber risk\ncoordinator of any state entity, who has been notified pursuant to\nsubdivision one of this section, with its plan for remediation of the\nbreach and future protection of such data and network.\n  3. For purposes of this section:\n  (a) "Breach of the security of the system" shall have the same meaning\nas defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section two hundred\neight of this article.\n  (b) "Breach of network security" shall mean unauthorized access to or\naccess without valid authorization of a computer network which\ncompromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of such network.\n  (c) "State entity" shall have the same meaning as provided by\nparagraph (c) of subdivision one of section two hundred eight of this\narticle.\n
N.Y. RRD Law § 197 — New York Code / Act RRD / Article 5 / Section 197
Protection of employees in the counties of Kings and Queens
Status: in_force

§ 197. Protection of employees in the counties of Kings and Queens.\nEvery corporation operating a street surface railroad in the counties of\nKings or Queens, shall cause the front and rear platforms of every\npassenger car propelled by electricity, cable or compressed air,\noperated on any division of such railroad during the months of December,\nJanuary, February and March, except cars attached to the rear of other\ncars, to be inclosed from the fronts of the platforms to the fronts of\nthe hoods so as to afford protection to any person stationed by such\ncorporation on such platforms to perform duties connected with the\noperation of such cars. Every corporation or person using and operating\na car in violation of this section shall be liable to a penalty of\ntwenty-five dollars per day for each car used and operated, to be\ncollected in an action brought by the transit commission and to be paid\nto the treasurer of the city of New York, or in a suit by the district\nattorney of the counties of Kings or Queens to be paid into the treasury\nof the city of New York.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 452 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 28-A / Section 452
Unauthorized charges in connection with permits for burials or erection of monuments
Status: in_force

§ 452. Unauthorized charges in connection with permits for burials or\nerection of monuments.  It shall be unlawful for a society or fraternal\norganization or a representative thereof to obtain, receive or exact or\nattempt to obtain, receive or exact, a fee or thing of value in addition\nto the regular dues or charges required to be paid pursuant to the\nby-laws, constitution, or rules of such society or fraternal\norganization as a condition to granting a permit for or consent to\nburial in or the erection of a monument or memorial upon a lot or plot\nin a cemetery. A violation of this section shall constitute a\nmisdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine of not more than five\nhundred dollars or not more than six months imprisonment or both.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 138 — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 4 / Section 138
Employment of persons apparently under eighteen years of age
Status: in_force

§ 138. Employment of persons apparently under eighteen years of age.\n1.  If any person apparently under eighteen years of age is employed\nwithout the certificate on file as required by law, in or in connection\nwith any employment to which the provisions of this article apply, the\ncommissioner may require the employer to cease employing the person or\nfile, within ten days after demand, evidence in the form required by the\neducation law for the issuance of such certificate that the person is\nover the age for which the certificate is required.\n  2. If the employer fails to furnish such evidence within ten days\nafter demand, and thereafter employs the person, proof of the service of\nthe demand and of the failure to furnish such evidence shall be prima\nfacie evidence in any prosecution brought for a violation of this\narticle that such person is under the age for which such certificate is\nrequired and is unlawfully employed.\n
N.Y. COR Law § 650 — New York Code / Act COR / Article 22-B / Section 650
Warrant for execution of death sentence
Status: in_force

§ 650. Warrant for execution of death sentence. 1. When a person is\nsentenced to the punishment of death, the justice or judge who presided\nat the sentencing proceeding, or if that justice or judge is unavailable\nfor any reason, then any justice of the supreme court of the department\nin which the defendant was sentenced, must, within seven days, make out,\nsign and deliver to the sheriff of the county, a warrant directed to the\ncommissioner or to the superintendent of an institution in the\ndepartment designated by the commissioner. Such warrant shall state the\nconviction and sentence, appoint a week on which the sentence shall be\nexecuted, and command the commissioner to execute the sentence within\nthat week. In counties within the city of New York, or in the county of\nWestchester, such warrant shall be made out as aforesaid, signed and\ndelivered to the commissioner of correction of such city or county.\n  2. If the execution of the sentence shall be delayed while the\nconviction or sentence is being appealed, a justice or judge authorized\nto act pursuant to subdivision one of this section, at the conclusion of\nthe state appellate process, if the conviction or sentence is not set\naside, must, within seven days, make out, sign and deliver another\nwarrant as provided in subdivision one of this section. If the execution\nof the sentence on the date appointed is delayed by any other cause, the\njustice or judge shall, as soon as such cause ceases to exist, make out,\nsign and deliver another warrant.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 225 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 11-A / Section 225
Application of this article
Status: in_force

§ 225. Application of this article. This article applies only to\nchurches, societies, districts, conferences, and such other authorized\nreligious organizations of the Free Methodist Church of North America as\nare or shall be situated in the state of New York.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 503-B — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 15 / Section 503-B
Transfer of projects
Status: in_force

§ 503-b. Transfer of projects. Notwithstanding any provision of this\narticle, or of any general, special or local law or charter to the\ncontrary, a municipality may, upon the establishment of a municipal\nurban renewal agency pursuant to the provisions of article fifteen-A of\nthis chapter, convey, assign, grant or otherwise transfer all of its\nright, title and interest in any urban renewal program, or part thereof,\nand any right, title and interest in or to any real or personal\nproperty, contract, claim or other interest acquired or held by it in\nconnection with such program, or part thereof, to such agency, with or\nwithout consideration, as it may determine.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 1116 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 11 / Section 1116
Printed case and brief not required
Status: in_force

§ 1116. Printed case and brief not required. In appeals under this\narticle, a printed case on appeal or a printed brief shall not be\nrequired.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 348 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 9 / Section 348
Superintendent authorized to examine
Status: in_force

§ 348. Superintendent authorized to examine. For the purpose of\ndiscovering violations of this article or securing information lawfully\nrequired hereunder, the superintendent may at any time, and as often as\nmay be determined, either personally or by a person duly designated by\nthe superintendent, investigate the loans and business and examine the\nbooks, accounts, records, and files used therein of every licensee.  For\nthat purpose the superintendent and duly designated representatives\nshall have free access to the offices and place of business, books,\naccounts, papers, records, files, safes and vaults of all such\nlicensees. The superintendent shall have authority to require the\nattendance of and to examine under oath all persons whomsoever whose\ntestimony may be required relative to such loans or such business.\n
N.Y. MHY Law § 67.05 — New York Code / Act MHY / Title E / Article 67 / Section 67.05
Nonresidents
Status: in_force

§ 67.05 Nonresidents.\n  (a) The commissioner may enter into reciprocal agreements or establish\ncompacts with other states, commonwealths, territories or possessions of\nthe United States, or their political subdivisions, for the care and\ntreatment of nonresidents in this state or for their prompt and humane\nreturn under proper supervision to their place of residence.\n  (b) A mentally disabled nonresident in a department facility may be\nreturned to his place of residence unless:\n  1. the applicable provisions of a compact or reciprocal agreement\nprovide otherwise; or,\n  2. the action would cause him and his family undue hardship.\n  (c) Upon the request of any mentally disabled patient or of a person\nacting in his behalf and with the patient's consent, the patient may be\ntransferred or released to any country, state, or place.\n  (d) When necessary for the well-being of the patient or the public,\nthe commissioner shall employ nurses or attendants to accompany a\nmentally disabled patient who is being transferred or released to\nanother jurisdiction pursuant to this section. Mentally disabled females\nshall be accompanied by female nurses or attendants.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 6341 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 63-A / Section 6341
Application for an extreme risk protection order
Status: in_force

§ 6341. Application for an extreme risk protection order. In\naccordance with this article, a petitioner may file an application,\nwhich shall be sworn, and accompanying supporting documentation, setting\nforth the facts and circumstances justifying the issuance of an extreme\nrisk protection order. Provided, however, that a petitioner that is a\nlaw enforcement agency that employs a police officer, as such term\ndefined in section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law, or is a police\nofficer or district attorney with jurisdiction in the county or city\nwhere the person against whom the order is sought resides shall file\nsuch application upon the receipt of credible information that an\nindividual is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious\nharm to themself or others, as defined in paragraph one or two of\nsubdivision (a) of section 9.39 of the mental hygiene law, unless such\npetitioner determines that there is no probable cause for such filing.\nSuch application and supporting documentation shall be filed in the\nsupreme court in the county in which the respondent resides. The chief\nadministrator of the courts shall adopt forms that may be used for\npurposes of such applications and the court's consideration of such\napplications. Such application form shall include inquiry as to whether\nthe petitioner knows, or has reason to believe, that the respondent\nowns, possesses or has access to a firearm, rifle or shotgun and if so,\na request that the petitioner list or describe such firearms, rifles and\nshotguns, and the respective locations thereof, with as much specificity\nas possible.\n
N.Y. TWN Law § 26 — New York Code / Act TWN / Article 3 / Section 26
Resignation of town officers
Status: in_force

§ 26. Resignation of town officers. Any town officer may resign to the\ntown clerk in the manner provided by section thirty-one of the public\nofficers law.\n
N.Y. DEA Law § 44 — New York Code / Act DEA / Article 4 / Section 44
Emergency measures to protect milk supply
Status: in_force

§ 44. Emergency measures to protect milk supply. When in the opinion\nof the commissioner of health a milk or cream supply has been so\ncontaminated as to be potentially dangerous to health or serious\ncurtailment of such a supply is threatened as a result of accident,\nsabotage or enemy action, he is hereby authorized to embargo any part of\nany such milk or cream supply pending investigation and, notwithstanding\nany contrary provisions of law, to authorize the transfer of milk and\ncream from one plant to another or from one political subdivision to\nanother for pasteurization, bottling or sale, and to waive or modify any\nrequirements, regulations or standards pertaining to or affecting the\nproduction, processing, handling, storage, transportation, sale, resale\nor distribution of milk and cream, or any operations or procedures\nincident thereto until conditions warrant normal operation.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 5207 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 52 / Section 5207
Enforcement involving the state
Status: in_force

§ 5207. Enforcement involving the state.  None of the procedures for\nthe enforcement of money judgments are applicable to a judgment against\nthe state. All procedures for the enforcement of money judgments against\nother judgment debtors are applicable to the state, its officers,\nagencies and subdivisions, as a garnishee, except where otherwise\nprescribed by law, and except that an order in such a procedure shall\nonly provide for the payment of moneys not claimed by the state, and no\njudgment shall be entered against the state, or any officer, department,\nboard or commission thereof, in such a procedure. This section shall not\nbe deemed to grant any court jurisdiction to hear and determine claims\nor actions against the state not otherwise given by law to such court.\n
N.Y. PBS Law § 92-A — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 5 / Section 92-A
Special telephone equipment for deaf and hard of hearing persons
Status: in_force

* § 92-a. Special telephone equipment for deaf and hard of hearing\npersons. 1. The commission shall require any regulated landline\ntelephone corporation providing local exchange service to sell or lease\nspecial telecommunication equipment to a person certified as deaf or\nhard of hearing where the addition of such equipment is necessary to\nenable such person to access and utilize the local exchange network. The\nsale of such equipment shall be at an amount not to exceed the actual\npurchase price by the corporation and the lease of such equipment shall\nbe at a rate to be determined by the commission. Any person who leases\nsuch equipment shall be permitted to apply the lease payments toward the\nequipment's purchase.\n  2. The commission shall authorize the establishment of the New York\ntelecommunications relay service workforce. In developing a request for\nproposals to provide telecommunications relay service the commission\nshall include the following minimum provisions:\n  (a) The provider of telecommunications relay service shall, in\nperforming services under a contract awarded pursuant to this\nsubdivision, employ or engage a workforce, all of whom shall reside\nwithin Onondaga county or an adjoining county within the state of New\nYork;\n  (b) A minimum of eighty percent of all calls utilizing\ntelecommunications relay service must be routed to and through the New\nYork telecommunications relay service workforce; and\n  (c) A contract to provide telecommunications relay service shall be\nrenewable for up to five years, and the commission shall be empowered to\npromulgate and adopt all regulations required to implement the terms of\nthis subdivision.\n  * NB Effective until June 30, 2030\n  * § 92-a. Special telephone equipment for deaf and hard of hearing\npersons. The commission shall require any regulated landline telephone\ncorporation providing local exchange service to sell or lease special\ntelecommunication equipment to a person certified as deaf or hard of\nhearing where the addition of such equipment is necessary to enable such\nperson to access and utilize the local exchange network. The sale of\nsuch equipment shall be at an amount not to exceed the actual purchase\nprice by the corporation and the lease of such equipment shall be at a\nrate to be determined by the commission. Any person who leases such\nequipment shall be permitted to apply the lease payments toward the\nequipment's purchase.\n  * NB Effective June 30, 2030\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 3443 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 34 / Section 3443
Workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance; optional policyholder deductibles
Status: in_force

§ 3443. Workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance;\noptional policyholder deductibles.  An insurer issuing a workers'\ncompensation and employers' liability insurance policy, may offer, as\npart of the policy or by endorsement, deductibles optional to the\npolicyholder for benefits payable under the policy, subject to approval\nby the superintendent and subject to underwriting by the insurer,\nconsistent with the following standards or factors:\n  (a) claimants' rights are properly protected and claimants' benefits\nare paid without regard to any such deductible;\n  (b) appropriate premium reductions reflect the type and level of any\ndeductible approved by the superintendent and selected by the\npolicyholder;\n  (c) premium reductions for deductibles are determined before\napplication of any experience modification, premium surcharge, or\npremium discount;\n  (d) recognition is given to policyholder characteristics, including\nsize, financial capabilities, nature of activities, and number of\nemployees;\n  (e) if the policyholder selects a deductible, the policyholder is\nliable to the insurer for the deductible amount in regard to benefits\npaid for compensable claims;\n  (f) the insurer pays all of the deductible amount, applicable to a\ncompensable claim, to the person or provider entitled to benefits and\nthen seeks reimbursement from the policyholder for the applicable\ndeductible amount; and\n  (g) failure to reimburse deductible amounts by the policyholder to the\ninsurer is treated under the policy in the same manner as nonpayment of\npremiums.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 407 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 4 / Section 407
Summons; action commenced pursuant to CPLR § 303
Status: in_force

§ 407. Summons; action commenced pursuant to CPLR § 303. In any action\nin this court to be commenced by service of summons upon an attorney or\na clerk as agent, as authorized by CPLR § 303, such service may be made\nin such manner and at such place, regardless of county lines, as would\nconfer jurisdiction on the supreme court in a like case.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 255.05 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title O / Article 255 / Section 255.05
Unlawfully issuing a dissolution decree
Status: in_force

§ 255.05 Unlawfully issuing a dissolution decree.\n  A person is guilty of unlawfully issuing a dissolution decree when,\nnot being a judicial officer authorized to issue decrees of divorce or\nannulment, he issues a written instrument reciting or certifying that he\nor some other purportedly but not actually authorized person has issued\na valid decree of civil divorce, annulment or other dissolution of a\nmarriage.\n  Unlawfully issuing a dissolution decree is a class A misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 2403 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 24 / Section 2403
Unfair methods of competition or unfair and deceptive acts or practices prohibited
Status: in_force

§ 2403. Unfair methods of competition or unfair and deceptive acts or\npractices prohibited. No person shall engage in this state in any trade\npractice constituting a defined violation or a determined violation as\ndefined herein.\n
N.Y. CAN Law § 31 — New York Code / Act CAN / Article 3 / Section 31
Lawful medical use
Status: in_force

§ 31. Lawful medical use. The possession, acquisition, use, delivery,\ntransfer, transportation, or administration of medical cannabis by a\ncertified patient, designated caregiver or the employees of a designated\ncaregiver facility, for certified medical use, shall be lawful under\nthis article provided that:\n  1. the cannabis or concentrated cannabis that may be possessed by a\ncertified patient shall not exceed the greater of the quantities\nauthorized in section 222.05 of the penal law or a sixty-day supply,\nprovided that during the last seven days of any sixty-day period, the\ncertified patient may also possess up to such amount for the next\nsixty-day period, consistent with any guidance and regulations issued by\nthe board;\n  2. the cannabis or concentrated cannabis that may be possessed by a\ndesignated caregiver shall not exceed the greater of the quantities\nauthorized in section 222.05 of the penal law or a sixty-day supply for\nthe certified patient, provided that during the last seven days of any\nsixty-day period, the certified patient may also possess up to such\namount for the next sixty-day period;\n  3. the cannabis that may be possessed by designated caregiver\nfacilities does not exceed the quantities referred to in subdivision one\nof this section for each certified patient under the care or treatment\nof the facility;\n  4. the form or forms of medical cannabis that may be possessed by the\ncertified patient, designated caregiver or designated caregiver facility\npursuant to a certification shall be in compliance with any\nrecommendation or limitation by the practitioner as to the form or forms\nof medical cannabis or dosage for the certified patient in the\ncertification;\n  5. the medical cannabis shall be kept in the original package in which\nit was dispensed under this article, except for the portion removed for\nimmediate consumption for certified medical use by the certified\npatient; and\n  6. in the case of a designated caregiver facility, the employee\nassisting the patient has been designated as such by the designated\ncaregiver facility.\n
N.Y. PBS Law § 17 — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 1 / Section 17
Certified copies of papers filed to be evidence
Status: in_force

§ 17. Certified copies of papers filed to be evidence.  Copies of all\nofficial documents and orders filed or deposited according to law in the\noffice of the commission, certified by a commissioner or by the\nsecretary or assistant secretary of the commission to be true copies of\nthe originals, under the official seal of the division, shall be\nevidence in like manner as the originals.\n