FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. EXC Law § 160-GGGG — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 6-H / Section 160-GGGG
Fees
Status: in_force

§ 160-gggg. Fees. 1. The department shall collect a fee of two hundred\nfifty dollars for a certificate of registration issued or reissued under\nthe provisions of this article. Additionally, the department shall\nassess twenty-five dollars for each appraiser added to an appraisal\nmanagement company's appraiser panel.\n  2. The department shall collect from each appraisal management company\nseeking to be registered, the amount determined by the appraisal\nsubcommittee to be a national registry fee for each appraiser, that\nperforms appraisal services within New York on the appraiser panel of an\nappraisal management company pursuant to Section 1109(a)(4) of the\nfederal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of\n1989 as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer\nProtection Act of 2010. The department may transmit the annual registry\nfee to the appraisal subcommittee. The department shall provide its\nroster of appraisal management companies to the appraisal subcommittee.\nThese transmittals shall occur at least annually.\n  3. Except for changes made on a renewal application, appraisal\nmanagement companies shall provide the department with notice of a\nchange in the appraisal management's principal address. Change of\naddress notifications shall be accompanied by a fee of ten dollars.\n  4. Except for changes made on a renewal application, the department\nshall collect a fee of ten dollars for changing a name on a certificate\nof registration.\n  5. In lieu of the fee set forth in subdivision one of this section,\nthe department shall collect a fee of three hundred fifty dollars to\nreissue a certificate of registration under this article which was\nsubmitted after the expiration of the immediately preceding registration\nterm.\n
N.Y. PML Law § 809 — New York Code / Act PML / Article 8 / Section 809
Review; assessment of additional tax
Status: in_force

§ 809. Review; assessment of additional tax. 1. Any final\ndetermination of the amount of any tax payable hereunder shall be\nreviewable for error, illegality or unconstitutionality or any other\nreason whatsoever by a proceeding under article seventy-eight of the\ncivil practice law and rules if the proceeding is commenced within four\nmonths after the giving of the notice of such final determination,\nprovided, however, that any such proceeding shall not be instituted by a\nperson liable for the tax unless the amount of any tax sought to be\nreviewed, with such interest and penalties thereon as may be provided\nfor by local law, shall first be deposited and an undertaking filed, in\nsuch amount and with such sureties as a justice of the supreme court\nshall approve to the effect that if such proceeding be dismissed or the\ntax confirmed, such person will pay all costs and charges which may\naccrue in the prosecution of such proceeding.\n  2. Where any tax imposed hereunder shall have been erroneously,\nillegally or unconstitutionally collected and application for the refund\nthereof duly made to the proper officer or officers, and such officer or\nofficers or, in the case of a city of one million or more which has\nestablished a tax appeals tribunal, such tax appeals tribunal, shall\nhave made a determination denying such refund, such determination shall\nbe reviewable by a proceeding under article seventy-eight of the civil\npractice law and rules if the proceeding is commenced within four months\nafter the giving of the notice of such denial, provided that a final\ndetermination of tax due was not previously made, and that an\nundertaking is filed with the proper officer or officers in such amount\nand with such sureties as a justice of the supreme court shall approve\nto the effect that if such proceeding be dismissed or the tax confirmed,\nthe person liable for the tax will pay all costs and charges which may\naccrue in the prosecution of such proceeding.\n  3. Except in the case of a wilfully false and fraudulent return with\nintent to evade the tax, no assessment of additional tax shall be made\nwith respect to the tax imposed under this article, after the expiration\nof more than three years from the date of the filing of a return,\nprovided, however, that where no return has been filed as provided by\nlocal law, the tax may be assessed at any time.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 343-Q*4 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 343-Q*4
Portion of state highway system to be designated as the "Cooper's Cave Bridge"
Status: in_force

* § 343-q. Portion of state highway system to be designated as the\n"Cooper's Cave Bridge". The bridge spanning the Hudson River on Route 9\nabove the Cooper's Cave in the city of Glens Falls, county of Warren and\nthe village of South Glens Falls, county of Saratoga, shall be\ndesignated and known as the "Cooper's Cave Bridge".\n  * NB There are 11 § 343-q's\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 263.00 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title O / Article 263 / Section 263.00
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 263.00 Definitions.\n  As used in this article the following definitions shall apply:\n  1. "Sexual performance" means any performance or part thereof which,\nfor purposes of section 263.16 of this article, includes sexual conduct\nby a child less than sixteen years of age or, for purposes of section\n263.05 or 263.15 of this article, includes sexual conduct by a child\nless than seventeen years of age.\n  2. "Obscene sexual performance" means any performance which, for\npurposes of section 263.11 of this article, includes sexual conduct by a\nchild less than sixteen years of age or, for purposes of section 263.10\nof this article, includes sexual conduct by a child less than seventeen\nyears of age, in any material which is obscene, as such term is defined\nin section 235.00 of this chapter.\n  3. "Sexual conduct" means actual or simulated vaginal sexual contact,\noral sexual contact, anal sexual contact, sexual bestiality,\nmasturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or lewd exhibition of the\ngenitals.\n  4. "Performance" means any play, motion picture, photograph or dance.\nPerformance also means any other visual representation exhibited before\nan audience.\n  5. "Promote" means to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give,\nprovide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmute, publish, distribute,\ncirculate, disseminate, present, exhibit or advertise, or to offer or\nagree to do the same.\n  6. "Simulated" means the explicit depiction of any of the conduct set\nforth in subdivision three of this section which creates the appearance\nof such conduct and which exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts,\ngenitals or buttocks.\n  7. "Oral sexual conduct" and "anal sexual conduct" mean the conduct\ndefined by subdivision two of section 130.00 of this chapter.\n  8. "Sado-masochistic abuse" means the conduct defined in subdivision\nfive of section 235.20 of this chapter.\n  9. For purposes of sections 263.10, 263.11, 263.15 and 263.16 of this\narticle, the terms "possession," "control" and "promotion" shall not\ninclude conduct by an attorney when the performance was provided to such\nattorney in relation to the representation of a person under\ninvestigation or charged under this chapter or as a respondent pursuant\nto the family court act, and is limited in use for the purpose of\nrepresentation for the period of such representation.\n
N.Y. EPT Law § 13-A-3.4 — New York Code / Act EPT / Article 13-A / Part 3 / Section 13-A-3.4
Disclosure of other digital assets of principal
Status: in_force

§ 13-A-3.4 Disclosure of other digital assets of principal\n  Unless otherwise ordered by the court, directed by the principal, or\nprovided by a power of attorney, a custodian shall disclose to an agent\nwith specific authority over digital assets or general authority to act\non behalf of a principal a catalogue of electronic communications sent\nor received by the principal and digital assets, other than the content\nof electronic communications, of the principal if the agent gives the\ncustodian:\n  (a) a written request for disclosure in physical or electronic form;\n  (b) a copy of the power of attorney that gives the agent specific\nauthority over digital assets or general authority to act on behalf of\nthe principal;\n  (c) an affidavit in which the affiant attests that the copy is an\naccurate copy of the original power of attorney and that, to the best of\nthe affiant's knowledge, the power remains in effect; and\n  (d) if requested by the custodian:\n  (1) a number, username, address, or other unique subscriber or account\nidentifier assigned by the custodian to identify the principal's\naccount; or\n  (2) evidence linking the account to the principal.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 103 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 9 / Section 103
Inducing common carrier to issue bill of lading when goods have not been received
Status: in_force

§ 103. Inducing common carrier to issue bill of lading when goods have\nnot been received.  Any person who with intent to defraud secures the\nissue by a common carrier of a bill of lading knowing that at the time\nof such issue, any or all of the goods described in such bill of lading\nas received for transportation have not been received by such common\ncarrier, or an agent of such common carrier or a connecting common\ncarrier, or are not under the common carrier's control, by inducing an\nofficer, agent or servant of such common carrier falsely to believe that\nsuch goods have been received by such common carrier, or are under its\ncontrol, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. ABP Law § 211 — New York Code / Act ABP / Article 2 / Section 211
Lands held under written contract
Status: in_force

§ 211. Lands held under written contract. Where lands have been\nescheated to the state and the person last seized was a citizen or\ncapable of taking and holding real property the commissioner shall\nfulfill any contract made by such person or by any person from whom his\ntitle is derived, in respect to the sale of such lands, so far only as\nto convey the right and title of the state, pursuant to such contract,\nwithout any covenants of warranty or otherwise, and shall allow all\npayment which may have been made on such contracts.  If any part of such\nescheated land has been occupied under a verbal agreement for the\npurchase thereof, and the occupants have made valuable improvements\nthereon, such agreement shall be as valid and effectual as if it were in\nwriting.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 2222 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 22 / Section 2222
Docketing order as judgment
Status: in_force

Rule 2222. Docketing order as judgment. At the request of any party\nthe clerk shall docket as a judgment an order directing the payment of\nmoney, including motion costs, or affecting the title to, or the\npossession, use or enjoyment of, real property, provided, however, that\nwhere the clerk maintains a section and block index, an order affecting\nthe title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property may\nbe entered in such index in lieu thereof.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 521-A — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 29-AAA / Section 521-A
Disclosure requirements
Status: in_force

§ 521-a. Disclosure requirements. Prior to entering into a contract\nfor services, the credit card registration service shall make the\nfollowing disclosures:  (a) a notice that the purchase of the services\nor the renewal thereof is not required for a consumer to retain his\ncredit card or access device; (b) a concise statement regarding the\nlimitations of a consumer's liability for unauthorized use of credit\ncards or access devices as established by the acts of Congress entitled\n"Truth in Lending Act" and "Electronic Fund Transfer Act" and the\nregulations thereunder, as such acts and regulations may from time to\ntime be amended.\n  Such disclosures if made orally shall also be made in writing by the\ncredit card registration service to the subscriber no later than thirty\ndays after the contract for services is entered into.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 202 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 2 / Section 202
Cause of action accruing without the state
Status: in_force

§ 202. Cause of action accruing without the state. An action based\nupon a cause of action accruing without the state cannot be commenced\nafter the expiration of the time limited by the laws of either the state\nor the place without the state where the cause of action accrued, except\nthat where the cause of action accrued in favor of a resident of the\nstate the time limited by the laws of the state shall apply.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 216 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 17-B / Section 216
Application of article
Status: in_force

§ 216. Application of article.  The general purpose of this article is\nto protect the public safety and health by controlling the salvaging of\ndamaged or contaminated food, food products and devices which come into\nintimate contact with food or food products.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 3105 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 31 / Section 3105
Representations by the insured
Status: in_force

§ 3105. Representations by the insured. (a) A representation is a\nstatement as to past or present fact, made to the insurer by, or by the\nauthority of, the applicant for insurance or the prospective insured, at\nor before the making of the insurance contract as an inducement to the\nmaking thereof. A misrepresentation is a false representation, and the\nfacts misrepresented are those facts which make the representation\nfalse.\n  (b)(1) No misrepresentation shall avoid any contract of insurance or\ndefeat recovery thereunder unless such misrepresentation was material.\nNo misrepresentation shall be deemed material unless knowledge by the\ninsurer of the facts misrepresented would have led to a refusal by the\ninsurer to make such contract.\n  (2) With respect to a policy of hospital, medical, surgical, or\nprescription drug expense insurance subject to articles thirty-two or\nforty-three of this chapter, no misrepresentation shall avoid any\ncontract of insurance or defeat recovery thereunder unless the\nmisrepresentation was also intentional.\n  (c) In determining the question of materiality, evidence of the\npractice of the insurer which made such contract with respect to the\nacceptance or rejection of similar risks shall be admissible.\n  (d) A misrepresentation that an applicant for life or accident and\nhealth insurance has not had previous medical treatment, consultation or\nobservation, or has not had previous treatment or care in a hospital or\nother like institution, shall be deemed, for the purpose of determining\nits materiality, a misrepresentation that the applicant has not had the\ndisease, ailment or other medical impairment for which such treatment or\ncare was given or which was discovered by any licensed medical\npractitioner as a result of such consultation or observation. If in any\naction to rescind any such contract or to recover thereon, any such\nmisrepresentation is proved by the insurer, and the insured or any other\nperson having or claiming a right under such contract shall prevent full\ndisclosure and proof of the nature of such medical impairment, such\nmisrepresentation shall be presumed to have been material.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 1544 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 45-B / Section 1544
Rulemaking authority
Status: in_force

* § 1544. Rulemaking authority. The attorney general may promulgate\nany other such rules and regulations as are necessary to effectuate and\nenforce the provisions of this article.\n  * NB Effective January 1, 2027\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 345 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 10 / Section 345
Compensation of attendants of appellate division in third and fourth departments
Status: in_force

§ 345. Compensation of attendants of appellate division in third and\nfourth departments. Each of the attendants appointed by the justices of\nthe appellate division of the fourth department shall receive a\ncompensation of three thousand four hundred fifty dollars per year,\npayable monthly. Each of the attendants appointed by the justices of the\nappellate division of the third department shall receive a compensation\nto be fixed by said justices at not to exceed three thousand four\nhundred fifty dollars per year, payable monthly. Such attendants shall\nalso be entitled to receive their traveling expenses to and from their\nhomes to the place where said sessions are held, not exceeding once in\neach term. The compensation of the attendants shall be paid by the\ndepartment of taxation and finance upon the certificate of the presiding\njustice of the department.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 119 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 9-A / Section 119
Punishment for violation of two preceding sections
Status: in_force

§ 119. Punishment for violation of two preceding sections.  Any person\nviolating any of the provisions of the two preceding sections shall be\nguilty of a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. RSS Law § 170 — New York Code / Act RSS / Article 4 / Section 170
Reimbursement of supplemental pension fund by the state
Status: in_force

§ 170. Reimbursement of supplemental pension fund by the state.  The\ncomptroller shall include with his budget estimate furnished to the\ngovernor for each fiscal year amounts estimated by him to be sufficient\nto reimburse the supplemental pension fund for: (a) the cost of\nproviding supplemental pension payments during the current fiscal year\nto all state retired employees, except those who retired from service\nwith a participating employer of the New York state employees'\nretirement system, as defined by subdivision twenty of section two of\nthis chapter; and (b) the state's pro rata share of the cost of\nproviding supplemental pension payments during the current fiscal year\nto state retired teachers, such pro rata share to be determined as\nprovided in section one hundred sixty-eight of this article. The\ncommissioner of education shall furnish the comptroller with such\ninformation and data as the comptroller may need to prepare such\nestimate.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 702 — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 20 / Section 702
Special mediators
Status: in_force

§ 702. Special mediators. The board may, when necessary, appoint or\ndesignate special mediators who shall have the authority and power of\nmembers of the board with regard to such matter, provided that their\nauthority and power to act for the board shall cease upon the conclusion\nof the specific matter so assigned to them or by revocation by the board\nof their appointment or designation. Such special mediators shall, when\nperforming the work of the board as aforesaid, be compensated at a rate\nto be determined by the board subject to the approval of the director of\nthe budget, together with an allowance for actual and necessary expenses\nincurred in the discharge of their duties hereunder.\n
N.Y. PBS Law § 150 — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 9 / Section 150
Board of railroad commissioners abolished; effect thereof
Status: in_force

§ 150. Board of railroad commissioners abolished; effect thereof.  The\nboard of railroad commissioners was abolished on July first, nineteen\nhundred and seven. All the powers and duties of such board conferred and\nimposed by any statute of this state shall hereafter be exercised and\nperformed by the public service commission.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 344-H*9 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 344-H*9
Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the "Sergeant Jonathan Gollnitz - New York Medal of Honor Highway"
Status: in_force

* § 344-h. Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the\n"Sergeant Jonathan Gollnitz - New York Medal of Honor Highway". All that\nportion of the state highway system constituting state route twenty in\nthe village of Fredonia, county of Chautauqua, shall be designated and\nknown as the "Sergeant Jonathan Gollnitz - New York Medal of Honor\nHighway".\n  * NB There are 14 § 344-h's\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 7-506 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 7 / Part 5 / Section 7-506
Delivery Without Indorsement: Right to Compel Indorsement
Status: in_force

Section 7--506. Delivery Without Indorsement: Right to Compel\n                  Indorsement.\n  The transferee of a negotiable tangible document of title has a\nspecifically enforceable right to have its transferor supply any\nnecessary indorsement, but the transfer becomes a negotiation only as of\nthe time the indorsement is supplied.\n
N.Y. SCP Law § 402 — New York Code / Act SCP / Article 4 / Section 402
Appearance for infant, incompetent, conservatee or person under disability 1
Status: in_force

§ 402. Appearance for infant, incompetent, conservatee or person under\n         disability\n  1.  An infant may appear by the guardian of his property, an\nincompetent by the committee of his property, and a conservatee by his\nconservator.  The appointment of a guardian ad litem does not bar the\nguardian, committee or conservator from appearing as a party.  The\nperson so appearing and his attorney shall each file on or before the\nreturn day of process an affidavit showing\n  (a)  that he is qualified to protect their rights,\n  (b)  whether he is related to or connected in business with any party\nto the proceeding or the attorney for any party,\n  (c)  whether he is entitled to share in the estate in which the\ninfant, incompetent or conservatee is interested or is in any way\ninterested therein,\n  (d)  whether he has any interest adverse to or in conflict with that\nof the infant, incompetent or conservatee and\n  (e)  such additional facts as may be required by the court.\n  2.  A person under disability shall appear by a guardian ad litem\nwhere no appearance is made as provided in subdivision one or where the\ncourt so directs because of possible adversity or conflict of interest\nor for other cause.\n
N.Y. RPA Law § 1061 — New York Code / Act RPA / Article 10 / Section 1061
Final judgment
Status: in_force

§ 1061. Final judgment. Upon the report being confirmed by the court,\nfinal judgment must be rendered. If the referee or commissioners have\nadmeasured and laid off to the plaintiff a distinct parcel of the\nproperty, the judgment must award to her, during her natural life, the\npossession of that parcel, describing it, subject to the payment of all\ntaxes, assessments, and other charges, accruing thereupon after she\ntakes possession. If the referee or the commissioners report, that is\nnot practicable, or that, in his or their opinion, it is not for the\nbest interests of all the parties concerned, so to admeasure and lay off\na distinct parcel of the property, the final judgment must direct, that\na sum, fixed by the court, and specified therein, equal to one-third of\nthe rental value of the real property, as ascertained by a reference or\notherwise, be paid to the plaintiff, annually or oftener, as directed in\nthe judgment, during her natural life, for her dower in the property;\nand that the sum so to be paid, be and remain a charge upon the\nproperty, during her natural life. The final judgment may also award\ndamages for the withholding of dower.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 156-F — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 12-A / Section 156-F
Rules and regulations
Status: in_force

§ 156-f. Rules and regulations.  The commissioner shall adopt and\npromulgate such rules and regulations generally to supplement and give\nfull effect to the provisions of this article, and specifically to\nregulate the marketing, packing, labeling and shipping of "culls," as he\nshall deem necessary. Such rules and regulations shall be filed and open\nfor public inspection at the principal office of the department and\nshall have the force of law.\n