FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. FCT Law § 360.2 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 3 / Part 6 / Section 360.2
Petition of violation
Status: in_force

§ 360.2. Petition of violation. 1. If at any time during the period of\nan order of probation or conditional discharge the probation service has\nreasonable cause to believe that the respondent has violated a condition\nthereof, it may file a petition of violation.\n  2. The petition must be verified and subscribed by the probation\nservice or the appropriate presentment agency. Such petition must\nstipulate the condition or conditions of the order violated and a\nreasonable description of the time, place and manner in which the\nviolation occurred. Non-hearsay allegations of the factual part of the\npetition or of any supporting depositions must establish, if true, every\nviolation charged.\n  3. The court must promptly take reasonable and appropriate action to\ncause the respondent to appear before it for the purpose of enabling the\ncourt to make a determination with respect to the alleged violation.\nSuch action may include the issuance of a summons under section 312.1 or\nthe issuance of a warrant under section 312.2.\n  4. If a petition is filed under subdivision one, the period of\nprobation as prescribed by section 353.2 or conditional discharge as\nprescribed by section 353.1 shall be interrupted as of the date of the\nfiling of the petition. Such interruption shall continue until a final\ndetermination as to the petition has been made by the court pursuant to\na hearing held in accordance with section 360.3 or until such time as\nthe respondent reaches the maximum age of acceptance into an office of\nchildren and family services facility.\n  5. If the court determines that there was no violation of probation or\nconditional discharge by the respondent, the period of interruption\nshall be credited to the period of probation or conditional discharge,\nas applicable.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 736 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 14-B / Section 736
Definitions
Status: in_force

* § 736. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms\nshall have the following meanings:\n  1. "Authorized buy-now-pay-later lender" means a buy-now-pay-later\nlender authorized by the superintendent pursuant to subdivision two of\nsection seven hundred thirty-seven of this article.\n  2. "Consumer" means an individual who is a resident of the state of\nNew York.\n  3. "Buy-now-pay-later loan" means closed-end credit provided to a\nconsumer in connection with such consumer's particular purchase of goods\nand/or services, other than a motor vehicle as defined under section one\nhundred twenty-five of the vehicle and traffic law. A "buy-now-pay-later\nloan" does not include credit where the creditor is the seller of such\ngoods and/or services, unless it is credit pursuant to an agreement\nwhereby, at a consumer's request, the creditor purchases a specific good\nand/or service from a seller and resells such specific good and/or\nservice to such consumer on closed-end credit. A "buy-now-pay-later\nloan" shall include the following categories of such loans:\n  (a) "Buy-now-pay-later zero-interest loan" means a buy-now-pay-later\nloan payable in one or more installments without any interest or finance\ncharge;\n  (b) "Buy-now-pay-later installment loan" means a buy-now-pay-later\nloan with either interest or finance charges or both; and\n  (c) Any other subset of buy-now-pay-later loans the superintendent may\nclassify as a separate category by regulation.\n  4. "Buy-now-pay-later lender" means a person who offers\nbuy-now-pay-later loans in this state. For purposes of the preceding\nsentence, "offer" means offering to make a buy-now-pay-later loan by\nextending credit directly to a consumer or operating a platform,\nsoftware or system with which a consumer interacts and the primary\npurpose of which is to allow third parties to offer buy-now-pay-later\nloans, or both. A person shall not be considered a buy-now-pay-later\nlender on the basis of isolated, incidental or occasional transactions\nwhich otherwise meet the definitions of this section.\n  5. "Exempt organization" means any national bank, federal savings\nbank, federal savings and loan association, federal credit union,\nfederal trust company, or foreign banking corporation licensed by the\ncomptroller of the currency to transact business in this state.\n  6. "Licensee" means a person who has been issued a license under this\narticle.\n  7. "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, association\nor any other business organization.\n  * NB Effective upon the one hundred eightieth day after the\npromulgation of rules and/or regulations by the department of financial\nservices to effectuate certain provisions (see Ch. 58 of 2025, Part Y, §\n13)\n
N.Y. STF Law § 97-XXXX — New York Code / Act STF / Article 6 / Section 97-XXXX
State health innovation plan account
Status: in_force

§ 97-xxxx. State health innovation plan account. 1. There is hereby\nestablished in the joint custody of the state comptroller and the\ncommissioner of the department of health an account of the miscellaneous\nspecial revenue fund to be known as the state health innovation plan\naccount.\n  2. Notwithstanding any other law, rule or regulation to the contrary,\nthe state comptroller is hereby authorized and directed to receive for\ndeposit to the credit of the state health innovation plan account,\nmonies received pursuant to the state innovation model initiative from\nthe centers for medicare and medicaid innovation.\n  3. Moneys of this account, following appropriation by the legislature,\nshall be available to the department of health for services and expenses\nof the state health innovation plan.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 175.25 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title K / Article 175 / Section 175.25
Tampering with public records in the first degree
Status: in_force

§ 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree.\n  A person is guilty of tampering with public records in the first\ndegree when, knowing that he does not have the authority of anyone\nentitled to grant it, and with intent to defraud, he knowingly removes,\nmutilates, destroys, conceals, makes a false entry in or falsely alters\nany record or other written instrument filed with, deposited in, or\notherwise constituting a record of a public office or public servant.\n  Tampering with public records in the first degree is a class D felony.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 260.31*2 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title O / Article 260 / Section 260.31*2
Misrepresentation by a child day care provider
Status: in_force

* § 260.31 Misrepresentation by a child day care provider.\n  A person is guilty of misrepresentation by a child day care provider\nwhen, being a child day care provider or holding himself or herself out\nas such, he or she makes any willful and intentional misrepresentation,\nby act or omission, to a parent or guardian of a child in the care of\nsuch provider (or a child whose prospective placement in such care is\nbeing considered by such parent or guardian) to any state or local\nofficial having jurisdiction over child day care providers, or to any\npolice officer or peace officer as to the facts pertaining to such child\nday care provider, including, but not limited to: (i) the number of\nchildren in the facility or home where such number is in violation of\nthe provisions of section three hundred ninety of the social services\nlaw, (ii) the area of the facility, home, or center used for child day\ncare, or (iii) the credentials or qualifications of any child day care\nprovider, assistant, employee, or volunteer. A misrepresentation subject\nto the provisions of this section must substantially place at risk the\nhealth or safety of a child in the care of a child day care provider.\n  Misrepresentation by a child day care provider is a class A\nmisdemeanor.\n  * NB There are 2 § 260.31's\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 4546 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 45 / Section 4546
Loss of earnings and impairment of earning ability in actions for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice
Status: in_force

§ 4546. Loss of earnings and impairment of earning ability in actions\nfor medical, dental or podiatric malpractice. 1. In any action for\nmedical, dental or podiatric malpractice where the plaintiff seeks to\nrecover damages for loss of earnings or impairment of earning ability,\nevidence shall be admissible for consideration by the court, outside of\nthe presence of the jury, to establish the federal, state and local\npersonal income taxes which the plaintiff would have been obligated by\nlaw to pay.\n  2. In any such action, the court shall instruct the jury not to deduct\nfederal, state and local personal income taxes in determining the award,\nif any, for loss of earnings and impairment of earning ability. The\ncourt shall further instruct the jury that any reduction for such taxes\nfrom any award shall, if warranted, be made by the court.\n  3. In any such action, the court shall, if warranted by the evidence,\nreduce any award for loss of earnings or impairment of earning ability\nby the amount of federal, state and local personal income taxes which\nthe court finds, with reasonable certainty, that the plaintiff would\nhave been obligated by law to pay.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 160-DDDD — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 6-H / Section 160-DDDD
Forms
Status: in_force

§ 160-dddd. Forms. An applicant for a certificate of registration as\nan appraisal management company shall submit an application on such\nforms as prescribed by the department.\n
N.Y. COR Law § 514 — New York Code / Act COR / Article 20 / Section 514
Confinement of civil prisoner
Status: in_force

§ 514. Confinement of civil prisoner.  A civil prisoner, committed to\njail upon process for contempt, or committed for misconduct in a case\nprescribed by law, must be actually confined and detained within the\njail, until he is discharged by due course of law, or is removed to\nanother jail or place of confinement, in a case prescribed by law. A\nsheriff or keeper of a jail, who suffers such a prisoner to go or be at\nlarge out of his jail; except by virtue of a writ of habeas corpus, or\nby the special direction of the court committing him, or in a case\nspecially prescribed by law; is liable to the party aggrieved, for his\ndamages sustained thereby, and is guilty of a misdemeanor. If the\ncommitment was for the nonpayment of a sum of money, the amount thereof,\nwith interest, is the measure of damages.\n
N.Y. PBL Law § 81 — New York Code / Act PBL / Article 7 / Section 81
Minerals subject to state ownership; exploration of mines on state lands
Status: in_force

§ 81. Minerals subject to state ownership; exploration of mines on\nstate lands.  1. The following minerals are the property of the people\nof the state of New York in their right of sovereignty:\n  (a) All deposits of gold and silver in or upon private lands and lands\nbelonging to the state heretofore or hereafter discovered within this\nstate.\n  (b) All deposits of minerals and fossils heretofore or hereafter\ndiscovered in or upon any lands belonging to the people of the state of\nNew York.\n  2. The commissioner of general services may, upon written application\nby any citizen of the United States, issue to such applicant a permit,\nconsent, or lease of such duration as the commissioner may deem\nadvisable, upon such terms and conditions as the commissioner shall\ndetermine, to enter upon state lands, for the purpose of exploring for\nmines and minerals or for the purpose of breaking up such lands and\nworking any mine or extracting any mineral in such lands.\n  In the case of state lands other than unappropriated state lands, the\nstate department, agency, commission or institution having jurisdiction\nover such lands shall receive notice from the commissioner of any\napplication to explore, break-up or mine, and shall have a period of not\nless than thirty days to report thereon in writing to the commissioner,\nand no permit, consent or lease shall be issued until such report has\nbeen received or the thirty day period has expired, and shall not be\neffective until approved by the governor.\n
N.Y. RRD Law § 146 — New York Code / Act RRD / Article 4 / Section 146
Foreclosure of mortgages made by consolidated railroads partly in the state
Status: in_force

§ 146. Foreclosure of mortgages made by consolidated railroads partly\nin the state.  Whenever a railroad corporation of this or of any other\nstate or states whose line of road lies partly in this state and partly\nin another state or states, shall have executed a mortgage upon its\nentire line of railroad, and a sale of the entire line of road under\nsuch mortgage shall have been or may hereafter be ordered, adjudged and\ndecreed by a court of competent jurisdiction of the state or states, or\nby a court of the United States sitting within the state or states in\nwhich the greater part of such line of railroad may be situated, upon\nthe confirmation of such judgment or decree, and of the sale made\nthereunder, by the supreme court of this state or by the circuit court\nof the United States in the judicial district in which some part of such\nline of road is situated, such sale shall operate to pass title to the\npurchaser, of that part of the line of railroad lying in this state,\ntogether with its appurtenances and franchises, with the same force and\neffect as if the judgment or decree under which such sale is had, had\nbeen made by a court of competent jurisdiction of this state. Such\njudgment or decree and sale may be so ordered, adjudged, decreed or\nconfirmed in any action or proceeding heretofore or hereafter brought in\nthe supreme court, or in a court of the United States sitting in this\nstate, for the foreclosure of such mortgage, or in aid of an action for\nthat purpose in such other state or states, if it shall appear that such\nconfirmation is for the interest of the public and of the parties, due\nand lawful provision being made for and in respect of any liens upon\nthat part of the line of road or other property sold situate in this\nstate, and for such costs, expenses and charges as may appear to be just\nand lawful. If a receiver of the entire line of such railroad shall have\nbeen, or may hereafter be appointed by such court of competent\njurisdiction of the state in which the greater part of the line of\nrailroad is situated, or by a court of the United States sitting in such\nother state, such receiver may perform, within this state, the duties of\nhis office not inconsistent with the laws of this state, and may sue and\nbe sued in the courts of this state.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 140-A — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 9 / Section 140-A
Provision for seed tests
Status: in_force

§ 140-a. Provision for seed tests. Any citizen of this state shall\nhave the privilege of submitting to the department samples of seeds for\ntesting and analysis subject to payment of a fee to the commissioner\nthat shall, at a minimum, cover the full costs of the services provided.\nAll monies received by the commissioner pursuant to this section shall\nbe deposited in an account within the miscellaneous special receive fund\nand shall be used to defray the expenses incidental to carrying out the\nservices authorized by this section.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 424 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 4 / Part 2 / Section 424
Probation services
Status: in_force

§ 424. Probation services. 1. A local probation service may provide\nservices to a party seeking to establish, modify or enforce a support\nobligation where there is a contract with the appropriate social\nservices district for the performance of support collection services\nunder section one hundred eleven-h of the social services law.\n  2. A local probation service may provide services to persons ordered\nto pay support seeking to modify such orders.\n  3. The probation service may not prevent any person who wishes to file\na petition under this article from having access to the court for that\npurpose nor may the probation service compel any person to appear at any\nconference, produce any papers or visit any place.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 59-A — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 3-A / Section 59-A
Additional qualifications of voters at annual and special corporate meetings
Status: in_force

§ 59-a. Additional qualifications of voters at annual and special\ncorporate meetings. Duly qualified voters at any annual or special\ncorporate meeting of any such incorporated church shall be baptised\npersons, who have been admitted to the full communion relations of such\nchurch according to its usages, and who are qualified in the other\nrespects prescribed by this article.\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 403 — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 8 / Section 403
Official undertakings
Status: in_force

§ 403. Official undertakings. The county clerk, the county treasurer,\nthe district attorney, the sheriff, such county officers as shall be\nspecially required by law, and such other county officers as may be\nrequired by local law or resolution of the board of supervisors, shall,\nbefore entering upon the duties of his office, execute an official\nundertaking as provided in section eleven of the public officers law,\nexcept as otherwise provided by law. The amount of such undertaking\nshall be fixed by the board of supervisors and approved by such board if\nin session and if not in session by the county clerk, except the\nundertaking of the county clerk shall be approved by the board of\nsupervisors if in session and if not in session by the county judge. The\nundertaking of the county clerk shall name the county and the people of\nthe state of New York as obligees and shall include any liability with\nrespect to the mortgage tax.\n  When in the opinion of the board of supervisors the sureties are\ndeemed insufficient and the money and property of the county may be\nunsafe, such board may direct a further undertaking upon ten days'\nnotification thereof in writing and such officer shall not perform any\nduties nor be entitled to compensation until such further undertaking is\nfurnished.  All elective and appointive county officers shall give such\nother undertakings as may be required by law.\n  The board of supervisors or any county officer shall have the power to\ndemand the giving of an undertaking by subordinates or employees, as may\nbe deemed necessary. Any default or misfeasance in office on the part of\nany such subordinate or employee shall be deemed a breach of the\nundertaking of the county officer appointing him as well as a breach of\nthe undertaking furnished by such subordinate or employee.\n  The neglect to furnish and file any such undertaking within the time\nprescribed by law, except in the cases of the sheriff, county clerk and\ndistrict attorney, shall be deemed a refusal to serve and the office may\nbe filled as in the case of a vacancy. Until the sheriff, county clerk\nor district attorney shall execute and file the required undertaking, he\nshall not perform any duties of the office, nor be entitled to any\ncompensation.\n  The board of supervisors shall cause an action to be brought upon any\nbreach of the conditions of any such undertaking.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 250.40 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title J / Article 250 / Section 250.40
Notice of intent to seek death penalty
Status: in_force

§ 250.40 Notice of intent to seek death penalty.\n  1. A sentence of death may not be imposed upon a defendant convicted\nof murder in the first degree unless, pursuant to subdivision two of\nthis section, the people file with the court and serve upon the\ndefendant a notice of intent to seek the death penalty.\n  2. In any prosecution in which the people seek a sentence of death,\nthe people shall, within one hundred twenty days of the defendant's\narraignment upon an indictment charging the defendant with murder in the\nfirst degree, serve upon the defendant and file with the court in which\nthe indictment is pending a written notice of intention to seek the\ndeath penalty. For good cause shown the court may extend the period for\nservice and filing of the notice.\n  3. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, where the people file\na notice of intent to seek the death penalty pursuant to this section\nthe defendant shall be entitled to an additional sixty days for the\npurpose of filing new motions or supplementing pending motions.\n  4. A notice of intent to seek the death penalty may be withdrawn at\nany time by a written notice of withdrawal filed with the court and\nserved upon the defendant. Once withdrawn the notice of intent to seek\nthe death penalty may not be refiled.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 8403 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 84 / Section 8403
Taxation without notice
Status: in_force

§ 8403. Taxation without notice. Costs may also be taxed without\nnotice.  A party who has taxed costs without notice shall immediately\nserve a copy of the bill of costs upon each party who is entitled to\nnotice under section 8402.  Within five days after such service, any\nsuch party may serve notice of retaxation of costs upon five days'\nnotice to the party who has taxed the costs, specifying the item as to\nwhich retaxation is sought.\n
N.Y. LEG Law § 48 — New York Code / Act LEG / Article 3 / Section 48
Publication of concurrent resolutions
Status: in_force

§ 48. Publication of concurrent resolutions. The secretary of state\nshall send to each newspaper designated pursuant to law, in the order in\nwhich they are passed, and as soon as the slips are printed, copies of\nsuch concurrent resolutions as are required to be published. Concurrent\nresolutions proposing amendments to the constitution shall be published\nin such newspapers, at the times prescribed by the election law, under\nthe direction of the secretary of state, at the expense of the state, in\nsuch manner, by the use of italics or bold face and brackets, as to\nindicate the new matter added and the old matter eliminated.\n
N.Y. RPP Law § 339-G — New York Code / Act RPP / Article 9-B / Section 339-G
Status of units
Status: in_force

§ 339-g. Status of units. Each unit, together with its common\ninterest, shall for all purposes constitute real property.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 201-E — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 7 / Section 201-E
Maintenance of employee-patient records at occupational health service centers
Status: in_force

§ 201-e. Maintenance of employee-patient records at occupational\nhealth service centers. No person charged with the custody and care of\nthe health records of employees treated at an on-site employer sponsored\noccupational health service facility shall release or disclose any\nemployee-patient record to an employer, except upon the express\nauthorization of the employee-patient, or as otherwise authorized by\nlaw.\n
N.Y. TRA Law § 219-C — New York Code / Act TRA / Article 9-B / Section 219-C
Operating authority
Status: in_force

§ 219-c. Operating authority. As used in this article, the term\n"metropolitan transportation authority" shall mean the authority and its\nsubsidiaries, the Long Island railroad, metro-north railroad,\nmetropolitan suburban bus authority and Staten Island rapid transit\noperating authority, of the Triborough bridge and tunnel authority, and\nof the New York city transit authority and its subsidiary, the Manhattan\nand Bronx surface transit operating authority, or any other agency that\nmay come under the control of the authority, or within their custody or\ncontrol.\n
N.Y. RPT Law § 1624 — New York Code / Act RPT / Article 16 / Section 1624
Construction of article
Status: in_force

§ 1624. Construction of article. 1. The provisions of this article\nshall be construed liberally, it being the intention of the legislature\nthat the creation of consolidated assessing units should be encouraged.\n  2. For purposes of any law pertaining to assessment administration or\nrelated matters, including public access to records, a reference to a\n"municipal corporation," a "municipality," a "local government," a "city\nor town," or a similar reference shall be construed to include a\nconsolidated assessing unit as well, unless the context requires\notherwise.\n