FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. RSS Law § 425 — New York Code / Act RSS / Article 9 / Section 425
Separability of retirement systems
Status: in_force

§ 425. Separability of retirement systems. No provision of this\narticle shall be construed as an impairment of the separability of or of\nthe corporate powers and privileges of the employees' retirement system\nor the police and fire retirement system. The comptroller shall\nestablish or continue separate funds and accounts for each retirement\nsystem, consistent with the common retirement fund herein provided for,\nas may be required to carry out the separate purposes and privileges of\neach retirement system.\n
N.Y. TCP Law § 92 — New York Code / Act TCP / Article 7 / Section 92
Semi-annual statements
Status: in_force

§ 92. Semi-annual statements. Every such corporation shall make a\nsemi-annual statement showing the quantity of all commodities on hand on\nthe first day of the period for which the statement is made; the\nquantity received and delivered during such period, and the quantity on\nhand on the last day of such period, and the quantity represented by\noutstanding certificates, receipts or orders, and the credit balances on\nthe books of the corporation. Such statement shall be made on or before\nthe tenth day of the month succeeding the period for which the statement\nis made and verified by the oaths of the president and secretary, and\nshall be filed within three days thereafter in the office of the county\nclerk in the county in which the office of the corporation is located,\nand a true copy thereof shall be posted in a conspicuous place in its\noffice for at least thirty days thereafter.\n
N.Y. RPA Law § 1607 — New York Code / Act RPA / Article 16 / Section 1607
Service of notice upon presumptive members of class
Status: in_force

§ 1607. Service of notice upon presumptive members of class.  When an\ninterest in the affected real property has been limited to a class,\nservice of the notice of the application upon those persons in being who\nare the presumptive members of such class at the moment immediately\nbefore the application is made shall be sufficient service as to such\ninterest. If no such presumptive members of the class exist, the\nprovisions of section 1608 apply.\n
N.Y. RSS Law § 214-B — New York Code / Act RSS / Article 7 / Section 214-B
Pension rights of certain retired persons who are appointed to the office of New York city marshal
Status: in_force

§ 214-b. Pension rights of certain retired persons who are appointed\nto the office of New York city marshal. a. Notwithstanding the\nprovisions of this chapter or the provisions of any state or local law\nor charter to the contrary, no retired person who retired from (1) the\nNew York city police pension fund, (2) the New York city employees'\nretirement system as (A) a member of the uniformed force of the New York\ncity department of correction, or (B) an employee of the city of New\nYork in the title of deputy city sheriff level one, deputy city sheriff\nlevel two, supervising deputy sheriff or administrative sheriff, or (3)\nthe New York city fire department pension fund in a title in the fire\nmarshal occupational group, and who is appointed to the office of New\nYork city marshal, shall have his or her retirement allowance suspended\nor reduced on or after the effective date of this section because of\ncompensation earned by such retired person from service as a New York\ncity marshal.\n  b. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision f of section two\nhundred ten of this article or the provisions of any other law to the\ncontrary, service in the office of New York city marshal by any retired\nperson shall not be considered employment in a position in the service\nof a former employer for the purposes of section two hundred eleven of\nthis article.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 396-K*2 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 26 / Section 396-K*2
Sale of certain motor vehicles damaged by the ravages of natural disaster
Status: in_force

* § 396-k. Sale of certain motor vehicles damaged by the ravages of\nnatural disaster. No person, firm or corporation shall knowingly sell in\nthis state any motor vehicle the mechanical or electrical system of\nwhich has been previously damaged by the ravages of a natural disaster\nsuch as fire, flood, hurricane, landslide, earthquake, windstorm or\nother storm, to an extent which rendered the vehicle inoperable for any\nperiod of time, unless notice, in writing, of the fact of such damage,\nthe nature and extent thereof and the date and location in which it\noccurred is first given to each buyer of such motor vehicle. For the\npurposes of this section, a vehicle shall be deemed to have been\nrendered inoperable if, as a result of the damage caused by the natural\ndisaster, it would be necessary for such vehicle to undergo repair in\norder to pass inspection in the manner provided in article five of the\nvehicle and traffic law.\n  A violation of this section shall constitute a class B misdemeanor.\n  * NB There are 2 § 396-k's\n
N.Y. RPA Law § 861 — New York Code / Act RPA / Article 8 / Section 861
Action for cutting, removing, injuring or destroying trees or timber, and damaging lands thereon
Status: in_force

§ 861. Action for cutting, removing, injuring or destroying trees or\ntimber, and damaging lands thereon. 1. If any person, without the\nconsent of the owner thereof, cuts, removes, injures or destroys, or\ncauses to be cut, removed, injured or destroyed, any underwood, tree or\ntimber on the land of another or on the common or other land of a city,\nvillage, town or county, or damages the land in the course thereof, an\naction may be maintained against such person for treble the stumpage\nvalue of the tree or timber or two hundred fifty dollars per tree, or\nboth and for any permanent and substantial damage caused to the land or\nthe improvements thereon as a result of such violation. Such reparations\nshall be of such kind, nature and extent as will reasonably restore the\nlands affected by the violation to their condition immediately before\nthe violation and may be made by physical restoration of such lands\nand/or by the assessment of monetary payment to make such restoration.\n  2. In any action brought pursuant to subdivision one of this section,\nif the defendant establishes by clear and convincing evidence, that when\nthe defendant committed the violation, he or she had cause to believe\nthe land was his or her own, or that he or she had an easement or right\nof way across such land which permitted such action, or he or she had a\nlegal right to harvest such land, then he or she shall be liable for the\nstumpage value or two hundred fifty dollars per tree, or both and\nreasonable costs associated with maintaining an action pursuant to this\nsection. In such case, the defendant shall also be liable for any\npermanent and substantial damage caused to the land or the improvements\nthereon as a result of such violation. Such reparations shall be of such\nkind, nature and extent as will reasonably restore the lands affected by\nthe violation to their condition immediately before the violation and\nmay be made by physical restoration of such lands and/or by the\nassessment of monetary payment to make such restoration.\n  3. For the purposes of this section "stumpage value" shall mean the\ncurrent fair market value of a tree as it stands prior to the time of\nsale, cutting, or removal. Stumpage value shall be determined by one or\nmore of the following methods: the sale price of the tree in an\narm's-length sale, a review of solicited bids, the stumpage price report\nprepared by the department of environmental conservation, comparison\nwith like sales on trees on state or private lands, or other appropriate\nmeans to assure that a fair market value is established within an\nacceptable range based on the appropriate geographic area.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 695-B — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 19-C / Section 695-B
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 695-b. Definitions. As used in this article, "child care provider"\nshall mean:\n  1. An operator of a group family day care home as defined in paragraph\n(d) of subdivision one of section three hundred ninety of the social\nservices law or\n  2. A family day care home as defined in paragraph (c) of subdivision\none of section three hundred ninety of the social services law or\n  3. An individual providing child care in reference to one or more\nchildren who are receiving child care assistance under title five-c of\narticle six of the social services law under circumstances where the\nindividual is not required to be licensed or registered under section\nthree hundred ninety of the social services law or to be licensed under\nthe administrative code of the city of New York.\n
N.Y. SCP Law § 1808 — New York Code / Act SCP / Article 18 / Section 1808
Effect of rejection of claim by fiduciary 1
Status: in_force

§ 1808. Effect of rejection of claim by fiduciary\n  1. Except as otherwise provided in 1810, whenever a fiduciary rejects\na claim in whole or in part all issues relating to the validity and\nenforceability of the claim shall be tried and determined upon the\njudicial settlement of his account.\n  2. The account of the fiduciary shall list all claims rejected by him\nin whole or in part and the reason for their rejection.\n  3. Service of the notice required by 1806 shall be completed prior to\nthe filing of any account reporting a rejected claim.\n  4. Any claimant adversely affected may within 8 days from the return\nof process serve and file objections to the account together with a copy\nof his notice of claim and any supporting affidavit filed with the\nfiduciary. If the fiduciary shall raise any affirmative defense to the\nclaim that is not set forth in his account, he shall within 5 days from\nthe service upon him of a copy of the objections serve and file a reply\nto the objections setting forth the affirmative defense. Any person\nwhose interests in the estate may be adversely affected by the allowance\nof the claim may within 8 days from the filing of objections by a\nclaimant serve and file a reply to the objections setting forth any\ndefense to the claim not set forth in the account.\n  5. Where one whose claim has been rejected by the fiduciary has\npetitioned for a compulsory judicial settlement of his account the\nfiduciary may in his answer to the petition show the condition of the\nestate and all facts relating to the rejection of the claim and pray for\na judicial determination of the validity and enforceability of the claim\nas a preliminary step in the accounting proceeding. The court may\nthereupon determine the claim and all issues relating thereto and make\nsuch direction for its payment as justice shall require.\n  6. With respect to any limitation of time within which an action or\nproceeding may be brought and with respect to examinations before trial,\nbills of particulars and disclosure generally, the presentation of a\nclaim as provided in 1803 shall be deemed the institution of a special\nproceeding for the collection of the claim.\n
N.Y. LLC Law § 1208 — New York Code / Act LLC / Article 12 / Section 1208
(Reserved)
Status: in_force

§ 1208. (Reserved)\n
N.Y. FDC Law § 11 — New York Code / Act FDC / Section 11
General fiscal requirements relating to the corporation
Status: in_force

§ 11. General fiscal requirements relating to the corporation. 1. The\nchairman of the corporation shall annually, at such time as the governor\nmay request, prepare and submit to the governor and the director of the\nbudget, on behalf of the directors of the corporation, an itemized\nbudget request and any additional information required setting forth\nfinancial needs by programs for the administration of the corporation\nduring the next succeeding state fiscal year including information as to\nthe payment or provision for payment of obligations of the corporation\nexpected to be required during such year under the terms of all leases,\nsubleases and agreements expected to be undertaken by the corporation.\nThe governor shall annually submit his recommended budget for the\nadministration of the corporation to the legislature. The legislature\nshall act on such request and make appropriations for all administrative\nexpenses of the corporation.\n  2. The comptroller, or his legally authorized representative, is\nhereby authorized and empowered from time to time to examine the books\nand accounts of the corporation, including its receipts and\ndisbursements and any other matters relating to its financial standing.\nSuch an examination shall be conducted by the comptroller at least once\nevery five years; the comptroller is authorized, however, to accept from\nthe corporation, in lieu of such examination, an external examination of\nits books and accounts made at the request of the corporation.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 7201 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 72 / Section 7201
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 7201. Definitions. In this article:\n  (a) "Domestication" means the reorganization pursuant to the\nprovisions of this article of the United States branch of an alien\ninsurer whereby a domestic or foreign insurer succeeds to all business\nand assets and assumes all liabilities of such branch.\n  (b) "United States branch" means the business unit through which\nbusiness is transacted within the United States by an alien insurer and\nthe assets and liabilities of such insurer within the United States\npertaining to such business.\n  (c) "Domestic insurer" means a stock insurance company incorporated\nunder the laws of this state.\n  (d) "Foreign insurer" means a stock insurance company incorporated\nunder the laws of any other state.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 409 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 13 / Section 409
Designation by sheriff of Onondaga county of court attendants for supreme and county courts
Status: in_force

§ 409. Designation by sheriff of Onondaga county of court attendants\nfor supreme and county courts. The sheriff of the county of Onondaga is\nhereby authorized by and with the consent and approval of the trial\njustices of the supreme court of the fifth judicial district residing in\nthe county of Onondaga and the county judges of Onondaga county,\nrespectively, to appoint and with the consent of said justices and\njudges at pleasure to remove not to exceed twenty-nine deputies, at\nleast seven of whom shall be women, to be attendants for the supreme and\ncounty courts of Onondaga county, who shall hold office until removal as\nherein provided and whose duty it shall be to attend the various terms\nof such courts held in and for the county of Onondaga and act as\nattendants thereat and perform such other services as shall be required\nand designated by said trial justices and county judges.  They shall\nhave all the powers of constables and shall receive an annual salary to\nbe fixed by the board of supervisors of Onondaga county. If at any term\nof the supreme or county court held in and for the county of Onondaga\nadditional attendants shall be necessary, the judge presiding at such\nterm shall certify such fact to the sheriff of Onondaga county, and the\nnumber of additional attendants required and said sheriff shall appoint\ntemporary attendants in the number specified by said judge to attend\nsaid term of court.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 241 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 9 / Section 241
Proceedings in court
Status: in_force

§ 241. Proceedings in court. Whenever two or more adjoining towns\nwhich, under the provisions of this chapter shall be liable to make or\nmaintain any bridge whether in the same or different counties, three\nfreeholders in either of such towns may, by petition signed by them,\napply to the town board in each of such towns, to build, rebuild or\nrepair such bridge, and if such town boards refuse to build, rebuild or\nrepair such bridge within a reasonable time, either for want of funds or\nany other cause, such freeholders, upon affidavit and notice of motion,\na copy of which shall be served on the supervisor or town clerk of each\nof said towns at least eight days before the hearing, may apply to the\nsupreme court at a special term thereof, to be held in the judicial\ndistrict in which such bridge or any part thereof shall be located, for\nan order requiring such town boards to direct the town superintendents\nto build, rebuild or repair such bridge, and the court upon such motion\nmay, in doubtful cases, refer the case to some disinterested person to\nascertain the requisite facts in relation thereto, and to report the\nevidence thereof to the court. Upon the coming in of the report, in case\nof such reference, or upon or after the hearing of the motion, in case\nno reference shall be ordered, the court shall make an order thereon as\nthe justice of the case shall require. If the motion be granted in whole\nor in part, whereby funds shall be needed to carry the order into\neffect, such court shall specify the amount of money required for that\npurpose, and how much thereof shall be raised in each town.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 208-C — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 10 / Section 208-C
Death benefits for dependent fathers or dependent mothers of certain police officers and firefighters
Status: in_force

§ 208-c. Death benefits for dependent fathers or dependent mothers of\ncertain police officers and firefighters. 1. Notwithstanding any other\nprovision of law, and in addition to any benefits otherwise provided,\nany municipality, as enumerated in section two hundred eight-b of this\nchapter, may elect to make the death benefit provided thereunder\navailable and paid to the dependent father or dependent mother, as he\nshall have nominated by written designation duly acknowledged and filed\nwith the chief officer of the municipality maintaining such police\ndepartment, or police force, or fire department; or, if there be no such\nnomination, then to his dependent father or dependent mother, as such\nchief officer, in his discretion, shall determine if\n  (a) The member shall leave no widow, or if his widow shall die before\nreceiving the total of the amounts provided in subdivision two of\nsection two hundred eight-b of this chapter, and\n  (b) He has no child or children under the age of eighteen surviving.\n  2. Application for such death benefit shall be made by the member's\ndependent father or dependent mother in the manner provided in\nsubdivision four of section two hundred eight-b of this chapter.\n
N.Y. UCT Law § 701 — New York Code / Act UCT / Article 7 / Section 701
Direction and execution of mandates
Status: in_force

§ 701. Direction and execution of mandates.\n  (a) In an action or proceeding brought in the court, all civil\nprocesses and mandates, except as otherwise provided in this act, may be\nserved or executed only within the county. They shall be executed by the\ncourt's enforcement officer within such area as is within his\nterritorial jurisdiction as elsewhere provided by law. Where this act\nempowers the court's process or mandate to be served or executed without\nthe county, or where it is to be served or executed within the county\nbut at such place therein as is beyond the territorial jurisdiction of\nthe court's enforcement officer, the process or mandate may be served or\nexecuted by such officer as could serve or execute the process or\nmandate of the supreme court of the county in a like instance.\n  (b) The provisions of law applicable in supreme court practice,\nrelating to the execution of mandates by a sheriff and the power and\ncontrol of the court over the sheriff executing the same, shall apply to\nthis court's enforcement officers.\n  (c) In any instance where a return by the enforcement officer is\nrequired by law to be made to the court or the clerk thereof, such\nprovision shall be deemed to refer to this court, or the clerk of this\ncourt, as the case may be; except that where this court has issued its\ntranscript the sheriff shall return executions to the county clerk with\nwhom such transcript is filed.\n  (d) Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the service\nof a summons, petition, notice of petition, subpoena or other paper by\nany person who might serve the same in a like instance in the supreme\ncourt.\n
N.Y. NPC Law § 1510-C — New York Code / Act NPC / Article 15 / Section 1510-C
Form of authorizations
Status: in_force

§ 1510-c. Form of authorizations.\n  Any form, authorization, permit or designation required by this\narticle may be signed by written instrument or the use of an electronic\nsignature, as that term is defined in subdivision three of section three\nhundred two of the state technology law, with the intent to execute the\ninstrument, writing or electronic record.\n
N.Y. GCT Law § 11 — New York Code / Act GCT / Article 2 / Section 11
Use of soft coal in public institutions
Status: in_force

§ 11. Use of soft coal in public institutions. No public institution\nmaintained by the state within the corporate limits of any city of the\nsecond class, shall use or burn bituminous coal in the operation of any\nof its departments, provided that the local ordinances of any such city\nforbid the use thereof.\n
N.Y. NAV Law § 40-B — New York Code / Act NAV / Article 4 / Part 1 / Section 40-B
Sale and use of tributyltin paint
Status: in_force

§ 40-b. Sale and use of tributyltin paint. 1. No person shall sell or\noffer to sell quick release tributyltin antifoulant bottom paints after\nJanuary first, nineteen hundred eighty-eight. For purposes of this\nsection, "quick release" shall mean a release rate of greater than five\nmicrograms of tributyltin per square centimeter per day.\n  2. No person shall apply a quick release tributyltin antifoulant\nbottom paint to any vessel expected to be used in the waters of the\nstate including the marine and coastal district, as defined in section\n13-0103 of the environmental conservation law, after January first,\nnineteen hundred eighty-eight, nor shall any person apply an antifoulant\nbottom paint having a release rate of greater than one microgram or less\nthan five micrograms of tributyltin per square centimeter per day to any\nnon-aluminum part of any vessel less than twenty-five meters in length\nwhich is expected to be used in the waters of the state including the\nmarine and coastal district after January first, nineteen hundred\neighty-eight.\n  3. After January first, nineteen hundred eighty-eight, paint\ncontainers holding antifoulant bottom paint having a release rate of\nmore than one microgram or less than five micrograms of tributyltin per\nsquare centimeter being sold or offered for retail sale shall not exceed\nthirty-two fluid ounces of such paint and shall have affixed to the\ncontainer a label which states the application of such paint is\nrestricted under New York state law to aluminum parts only.\n  4. The department of environmental conservation shall, prior to\nJanuary first, nineteen hundred eighty-eight, develop a list of those\nquick release antifoulant bottom paints which have been banned from use\nin this state under the provisions of this section as well as a list of\nthose tributyltin antifoulant bottom paints which have had their sale\nand application restricted under the provisions of this section. The\ndepartment shall make such lists available to any interested party and\nshall make a reasonable effort to transmit such lists to known\nmanufacturers and those places of sale of such paints within the state\nand shall until December thirty-first, nineteen hundred eighty-eight\nprovide such list to any applicant for a license or permit under article\neleven or thirteen of the environmental conservation law.\n  5. Any violation of this section shall be a violation punishable by a\nfine of not less than one hundred nor more than two hundred fifty\ndollars.\n