FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. CPL Law § 610.40 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 3 / Title R / Article 610 / Section 610.40
Securing attendance of witnesses by subpoena; how and by whom subpoena may be served
Status: in_force

§ 610.40  Securing attendance of witnesses by subpoena; how and by whom\n             subpoena may be served.\n  A subpoena may be served by any person more than eighteen years old.\nService must be made in the manner provided by the civil practice law\nand rules for the service of subpoenas in civil cases.\n
N.Y. STF Law § 97-XXX*2 — New York Code / Act STF / Article 6 / Section 97-XXX*2
Agriculture in the classroom fund
Status: in_force

* § 97-xxx. Agriculture in the classroom fund. 1. There is hereby\nestablished in the joint custody of the state comptroller and the\ncommissioner of taxation and finance a fund to be known as the\n"agriculture in the classroom fund".\n  2. Such fund shall consist of all moneys collected pursuant to section\nfour hundred four-s of the vehicle and traffic law, and all other moneys\ncredited or transferred thereto from any other fund or source pursuant\nto law, provided, however that any funds necessary to complete design\nand production of the distinctive license plates authorized by section\nfour hundred four-s of the vehicle and traffic law shall first be\nallocated for such purposes.\n  3. Moneys of the fund shall be expended for the purposes of providing\nfunding for agriculture in the classroom programs conducted in\ncooperation with the department of agriculture and markets. Moneys shall\nbe paid out of the fund on the audit and warrant of the state\ncomptroller on vouchers approved by the commissioner of agriculture and\nmarkets. Any interest received by the comptroller on moneys on deposit\nin the agriculture in the classroom fund shall be retained in and become\npart of such fund.\n  * NB There are 2 § 97-xxx's\n
N.Y. UCT Law § 102 — New York Code / Act UCT / Article 1 / Section 102
Application of UCCA
Status: in_force

§ 102. Application of UCCA.\n  The jurisdiction of and practice and procedure in each court governed\nby the UCCA shall be as prescribed herein, and each such court shall be\na part of the unified court system for the state. Such court in each\ncity shall have an official seal to be furnished by the city upon which\nshall be engraved the words "(insert name of court) Court of (insert\nname of city), New York, Seal".\n
N.Y. UDA Law § 31-A — New York Code / Act UDA / Section 31-A
Actions against corporation
Status: in_force

§ 31-a. Actions against corporation. Except in an action for wrongful\ndeath, in any case founded upon tort a notice of claim shall be required\nas a condition precedent to the commencement of an action or special\nproceeding against the corporation, any of it subsidiary corporations,\nor any officer, appointee or employee thereof, and the provisions of\nsection fifty-e of the general municipal law shall govern the giving of\nsuch notice. No such action shall be commenced more than one year and\nninety days after the cause of action therefor shall have accrued. An\naction for wrongful death shall be commenced in accordance with the\nnotice of claim and time limitation provisions of title eleven of\narticle nine of the public authorities law.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 2-A-304 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 2-A / Part 3 / Section 2-A-304
Subsequent Lease of Goods by Lessor
Status: in_force

Section 2-A-304. Subsequent Lease of Goods by Lessor.\n  (1) Subject to Section 2-A-303, a subsequent lessee from a lessor of\ngoods under an existing lease contract obtains, to the extent of the\nleasehold interest transferred, the leasehold interest in the goods that\nthe lessor had or had power to transfer, and, except as provided in\nsubsection (2) and Section 2-A-527(4), takes subject to the existing\nlease contract. A lessor with voidable title has power to transfer a\ngood leasehold interest to a good faith subsequent lessee for value, but\nonly to the extent set forth in the preceding sentence. If goods have\nbeen delivered under a transaction of purchase, the lessor has that\npower even though:\n       (a) the lessor's transferor was deceived as to the identity of\n           the lessor;\n       (b) the delivery was in exchange for a check which is later\n           dishonored;\n       (c) it was agreed that the transaction was to be a "cash sale";\n           or\n       (d) the delivery was procured through fraud punishable as\n           larcenous under the criminal law.\n  (2) A subsequent lessee in the ordinary course of business from a\nlessor who is a merchant dealing in goods of that kind to whom the goods\nwere entrusted by a prior lessee before the interest of the subsequent\nlessee became enforceable against that lessor obtains, to the extent of\nthe leasehold interest transferred, all of that lessor's and the prior\nlessee's rights to the goods and takes free of the existing lease\ncontract.\n  (3) A subsequent lessee from the lessor of goods that are subject to\nan existing lease contract and are covered by a certificate of title\nissued under a statute of this state or of another jurisdiction takes no\ngreater rights than those provided both by this section and by the\ncertificate of title statute.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 500-I — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 28 / Section 500-I
Severability
Status: in_force

§ 500-i. Severability. If any provision of this article or the\napplication thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such\ninvalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the\narticle which can be given effect without the invalid provision or\napplication, and to this end the provisions of this article are declared\nto be severable.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 186 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 16 / Section 186
Possession and use of false devices; responsibility
Status: in_force

§ 186. Possession and use of false devices; responsibility. 1.  No\nperson shall retain in his possession any weight, measure or weighing\nand measuring device or system, knowing it to be false, with intent to\nuse it or permit to be used for determining the quantity of any\ncommodity. Possession of the same shall be prima facie evidence of a\nviolation of this section.\n  2. For the purpose of purchase, sale or service, no person shall use a\nfalse weight, measure, device or system for determining the quantity of\nany commodity.  If the seller furnishes the weight or measure of the\ncommodity sold, he shall not sell or deliver less of any such commodity\nthan the quantity represented to be sold; if the buyer furnishes the\nweight or measure of the commodity purchased, he shall not receive or\naccept more of any such commodity than the quantity represented to be\npurchased.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 2869 — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 28-A / Section 2869
Separability
Status: in_force

§ 2869. Separability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph or part of\nthis article shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to\nbe invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the\nremainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause,\nsentence, paragraph, section or part thereof directly involved in the\ncontroversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 2-A-204 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 2-A / Part 2 / Section 2-A-204
Formation in General
Status: in_force

Section 2-A-204. Formation in General.\n  (1) A lease contract may be made in any manner sufficient to show\nagreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the\nexistence of a lease contract.\n  (2) An agreement sufficient to constitute a lease contract may be\nfound although the moment of its making is undetermined.\n  (3) Although one or more terms are left open, a lease contract does\nnot fail for indefiniteness if the parties have intended to make a lease\ncontract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an\nappropriate remedy.\n
N.Y. PAR Law § 19.27 — New York Code / Act PAR / Title C / Article 19-A / Section 19.27
Limitations on actions by the office
Status: in_force

§ 19.27 Limitations on actions by the office.  The procedures set\nforth in sections 19.14, 19.15, 19.16, 19.17, 19.18 and 19.19 of this\narticle shall not be available to the office unless the office shall\nhave fully complied with section 19.25 of this article.  In the event\nthat the office shall have failed to comply with such section, any\naction by the office shall be governed by the period of limitations that\nwould have applied in the absence of this article.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 310-A — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 3 / Section 310-A
Personal service upon a limited partnership
Status: in_force

§ 310-a. Personal service upon a limited partnership. (a) Personal\nservice upon any domestic or foreign limited partnership shall be made\nby delivering a copy personally to any managing or general agent or\ngeneral partner of the limited partnership in this state, to any other\nagent or employee of the limited partnership authorized by appointment\nto receive service or to any other person designated by the limited\npartnership to receive process, in the manner provided by law for\nservice of summons, as if such person was the defendant. Personal\nservice upon a limited partnership subject to the provisions of article\neight-A of the partnership law may also be made pursuant to section\n121-109 of such law.\n  (b) If service is impracticable under subdivision (a) of this section,\nit may be made in such manner as the court, upon motion without notice,\ndirects.\n  (c) A limited liability partnership may also be served pursuant to\nsection 121-1505 of the partnership law.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 585 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 12-C / Section 585
Superintendent authorized to examine
Status: in_force

§ 585. Superintendent authorized to examine. For the purpose of\ndiscovering violations of this article or securing information lawfully\nrequired by him or her hereunder, the superintendent may at any time,\nand as often as he or she may determine, either personally or by a\nperson duly designated by him or her, investigate the business and\nexamine the books, accounts, records, and files used therein of every\nlicensee hereunder. For that purpose the superintendent and his or her\nduly designated representative shall have free access to the offices and\nplace of business, books, accounts, papers, records, files, safes and\nvaults of all such licensees. The superintendent and any person duly\ndesignated by him or her shall have authority to require the attendance\nof and to examine under oath all persons whose testimony he or she may\nrequire relative to such business. The expenses incurred in making any\nexamination pursuant to this section shall be assessed against and paid\nby the licensee so examined, except that traveling and subsistence\nexpenses so incurred shall be charged against and paid by licensees in\nsuch proportions as the superintendent shall deem just and reasonable,\nand such proportionate charges shall be added to the assessment of the\nother expenses incurred upon each examination. Upon written notice by\nthe superintendent of the total amount of such assessment, the licensee\nshall become liable for and shall pay such assessment to the\nsuperintendent. If, upon review, the superintendent shall determine that\nthe fees or service charges set by the licensee are unreasonable, he or\nshe shall direct the licensee to make adjustments in said fees and\nservice charges in accordance with his or her findings, which shall set\nforth a detailed factual basis and reasoning supporting such finding.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 199 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 17 / Section 199
Application of article
Status: in_force

§ 199. Application of article. 1. The provisions of this article\nregarding the selling of food shall be considered to include the\nmanufacture, production, processing, packing, transportation, exposure,\noffer, possession, and holding of any such article for sale; the sale,\ndispensing, and giving of any such article; and the supplying or\napplying of any such articles in the conduct of any food establishment.\n  2. The provisions of this article regarding adulteration shall not\napply to food or food products for animals, provided, however, that\nanimal food and food products which are or may be adulterated within the\nmeaning of this article may only be manufactured, produced, processed,\npacked, transported, exposed, offered, possessed, and held for sale\npursuant to rules and regulations promulgated under authority of section\ntwo hundred fourteen-b of this article. Such rules and regulations shall\nprovide for the safety of humans by requiring, among other things, the\ndecharacterization of such products and the prominent labeling thereof\nas unfit for human consumption, and for the health of animals by\nprohibiting the use of certain adulterated products or the use of\ncarcasses of animals or poultry or parts thereof affected with diseases\nof particular concern to public and animal health, and may require such\nother safeguards, including heat processing, as are necessary to protect\nanimal health.\n  3. The provisions of this article regarding misbranding shall not\napply to commercial feed as defined in article eight of this chapter,\nprovided such feed complies with the provisions of such article eight\nand the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.\n  4. The provisions of this article shall not apply to game or wild\ngame.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 204 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 2 / Section 204
Stay of commencement of action; demand for arbitration
Status: in_force

§ 204. Stay of commencement of action; demand for arbitration.  (a)\nStay. Where the commencement of an action has been stayed by a court or\nby statutory prohibition, the duration of the stay is not a part of the\ntime within which the action must be commenced.\n  (b) Arbitration. Where it shall have been determined that a party is\nnot obligated to submit a claim to arbitration, the time which elapsed\nbetween the demand for arbitration and the final determination that\nthere is no obligation to arbitrate is not a part of the time within\nwhich an action upon such claim must be commenced. The time within which\nthe action must be commenced shall not be extended by this provision\nbeyond one year after such final determination.\n
N.Y. PBG Law § 11 — New York Code / Act PBG / Article 2 / Section 11
Commissioner of housing and community renewal; appointment; term of office; vacancies; salaries
Status: in_force

§ 11. Commissioner of housing and community renewal; appointment; term\nof office; vacancies; salaries.  The head of the division of housing and\ncommunity renewal shall be the commissioner of housing and community\nrenewal who shall be appointed by the governor and shall hold office\nduring his pleasure. The commissioner shall receive an annual salary to\nbe fixed by the governor within the amount appropriated therefor. The\ncommissioner shall be the chief executive officer of the division, and\nhe may, by order filed in the executive department, delegate any of his\npowers to or direct any of his duties to be performed by a deputy,\nexcept the power to appoint or remove officers or employees or to fix\ntheir compensation.\n
N.Y. PBA Law § 4001 — New York Code / Act PBA / Article 11 / Section 4001
Laws repealed
Status: in_force

§ 4001. Laws repealed. Of the laws enumerated in the schedule hereto\nannexed, that portion specified in the last column is hereby repealed;\nand all acts and parts of acts, both general and special or local,\ninconsistent with this chapter are hereby repealed.\n
N.Y. ETP Law § 1 — New York Code / Act ETP / Section 1
Short title
Status: in_force

Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as\nthe "emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four".\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 1010 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 10 / Section 1010
Dismissal or separate trial of third-party complaint
Status: in_force

Rule 1010. Dismissal or separate trial of third-party complaint.  The\ncourt may dismiss a third-party complaint without prejudice, order a\nseparate trial of the third-party claim or of any separate issue\nthereof, or make such other order as may be just. In exercising its\ndiscretion, the court shall consider whether the controversy between the\nthird-party plaintiff and the third-party defendant will unduly delay\nthe determination of the main action or prejudice the substantial rights\nof any party.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 300 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 9 / Section 300
Stenographer must furnish certified transcript of proceedings to parties on payment of fees
Status: in_force

§ 300. Stenographer must furnish certified transcript of proceedings\nto parties on payment of fees. The stenographer shall, upon the payment\nof his fees allowed by law therefor, furnish a certified transcript of\nthe whole or any part of his minutes, in any case reported by him, to\nany party to the action requiring the same.\n
N.Y. RPA Law § 903 — New York Code / Act RPA / Article 9 / Section 903
Necessary defendants
Status: in_force

§ 903. Necessary defendants. Each of the following persons shall be\nmade a party to the action:\n  1. Every person having an undivided share, in possession or otherwise,\nin the property, as tenant in fee, for life, by the curtesy or for\nyears;\n  2. Every person entitled to the reversion, remainder or inheritance of\nan undivided share, after the determination of a particular estate\ntherein;\n  3. Every person who, by any contingency, is or may become entitled to\na beneficial interest in an undivided share in the property, provided\nthat where a future estate or interest is limited in any contingency to\nthe persons who shall compose a certain class upon the happening of a\nfuture event, it shall be sufficient to make parties to the action the\npersons who would have been entitled to such estate or interest if such\nevent had happened immediately before the commencement of the action;\n  4. Every person having an inchoate right of dower in an undivided\nshare in the property;\n  5. Every person having a right of dower in the property, or any part\nthereof, which has not been admeasured; and\n  6. An executor or administrator, where letters testamentary or of\nadministration have been issued on the estate of the decedent from whom\nthe plaintiff's title to the real property is derived, and the action is\nbrought within eighteen months after such letters were issued; or where\nthe person of whose estate the executor or administrator has been\nappointed should, if living, be a party to the action. If no executor or\nadministrator has been appointed for the estate of such a person, that\nfact must be stated in the complaint.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 175-A — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 15 / Section 175-A
Review by court
Status: in_force

§ 175-a. Review by court. The final determination of the commissioner\non a hearing as authorized by subdivision six of section one hundred\nseventy-four of this article may be reviewed in the manner provided by\narticle seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules, provided,\nhowever, that a stay shall not be granted by the court or a justice\nthereof pending final determination of the matter except on notice to\nthe commissioner. The determination of the commissioner after the\nopportunity for a hearing and any hearing shall be final unless within\nthirty days from the receipt of written notice thereof a proceeding is\ninstituted to review the same.\n
N.Y. SCT Law § 57 — New York Code / Act SCT / Article 2 / Section 57
Court shall determine and enforce all rights of parties to said action
Status: in_force

§ 57. Court shall determine and enforce all rights of parties to said\naction. The court shall have full power to determine and enforce in all\nrespects the rights, claims and demands of the several parties to said\naction, including the rights, claims and demands of the defendants as\nbetween themselves, to direct a sale of such real property and the\ndistribution or other disposition of the proceeds of sale. Any party to\nthe action, including the county of Suffolk, may become the purchaser at\nany such sale.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 250.30 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title N / Article 250 / Section 250.30
Unlawfully obtaining communications information
Status: in_force

§ 250.30 Unlawfully obtaining communications information.\n  A person is guilty of unlawfully obtaining communications information\nwhen, knowing that he does not have the authorization of a telephone or\ntelegraph corporation, he obtains or attempts to obtain, by deception,\nstealth or in any other manner, from such corporation or from any\nemployee, officer or representative thereof:\n  1. Information concerning identification or location of any wires,\ncables, lines, terminals or other apparatus used in furnishing telephone\nor telegraph service; or\n  2. Information concerning a record of any communication passing over\ntelephone or telegraph lines of any such corporation.\n  Unlawfully obtaining communications information is a class B\nmisdemeanor.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 8 — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 2 / Section 8
Application of revenues of a public improvement or part thereof, or service
Status: in_force

§ 8. Application of revenues of a public improvement or part thereof,\nor service. For the purpose of determining the amount of taxes which may\nbe raised on real estate pursuant to section ten of article eight of the\nconstitution the revenues received in each fiscal year by any county,\ncity or village from that portion of a public improvement or part\nthereof, or service, owned or rendered by such municipal corporation for\nwhich bonds or capital notes are issued after January first, nineteen\nhundred fifty, shall be applied first to the payment of all costs of\noperation, maintenance and repairs thereof incurred during such fiscal\nyear, and then to the payment of the amounts required in such fiscal\nyear to pay the interest on and the amortization of, or payment of, such\nindebtedness contracted for such public improvement or part thereof, or\nservice, or such revenues may be deposited in a special fund to be used\nsolely for such payments. The provisions of this section shall not\nprohibit the use of excess revenues for any lawful county, city or\nvillage purpose. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a\npublic improvement or part thereof constructed to provide for the supply\nof water or to a joint sewage or drainage project described in section\n15.00 of the local finance law.\n
N.Y. PEP Law § 48-C — New York Code / Act PEP / Article 3-A / Section 48-C
Assignment of future earnings by person unemployed; effect of loss of employment
Status: in_force

§ 48-c. Assignment of future earnings by person unemployed; effect of\nloss of employment. If the assignor is not employed at the time he makes\nan assignment of future earnings, but is thereafter employed, his future\nearnings shall nevertheless become collectible by the assignee as\nprovided in this article upon the filing of the prescribed documents\nwith the employer. No assignment of future earnings shall become invalid\nby reason of the cessation of employment, or cessation of payment of\nearnings, but shall continue in effect, and may be applied to the\npayment of any future earnings from the same or other employment, in\naccordance with the provisions of this article, so long as the\nindebtedness secured by the assignment shall remain unpaid in whole or\nin part. If the assignor is re-employed by the same employer before the\nexpiration of ninety days from the termination of employment, the\nassignment shall continue to be collectible without further filing of\npapers. If the employee is re-employed on or after the expiration of\nsuch ninety days, the assignment shall again become collectible from the\nemployer as provided in section forty-eight-a only after copies of the\nassignment and the other documents specified in such section have been\nfiled with the employer following the re-employment.\n