FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. GBS Law § 685 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 33 / Section 685
Escrows and impoundments
Status: in_force

§ 685. Escrows and impoundments. If the department of law finds that\nthe applicant for registration has failed to demonstrate that adequate\nfinancial arrangements have been made to fulfill obligations to provide\nreal estate, improvements, equipment, inventory, training, or other\nitems included in the offering, the department may require the escrow or\nimpoundment of franchise fees and other funds paid by the franchisee or\nsubfranchisor until the obligations are fulfilled, or, at the option of\nthe franchisor, the furnishing of a surety bond as provided by rule of\nthe department of law if it finds that the requirement is necessary and\nappropriate to protect prospective franchisees or subfranchisors.\n
N.Y. TRA Law § 403*2 — New York Code / Act TRA / Article 16 / Section 403*2
Definitions
Status: in_force

* § 403. Definitions. For the purposes of this article:\n  1. "New York city transit authority" shall be deemed to include its\nsubsidiary, the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority,\nand any other agency that may come under the control of the New York\ncity transit authority.\n  2. "Daniel Boggs - Marvin Franklin New York city transit authority's\non-track safety program" shall mean the program as described in section\nfour hundred six of this article.\n  * NB There are 2 § 403's\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 2-721 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 2 / Part 7 / Section 2-721
Remedies for Fraud
Status: in_force

Section 2--721. Remedies for Fraud.\n  Remedies for material misrepresentation or fraud include all remedies\navailable under this Article for non-fraudulent breach. Neither\nrescission or a claim for rescission of the contract for sale nor\nrejection or return of the goods shall bar or be deemed inconsistent\nwith a claim for damages or other remedy.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 221-B — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 5-B / Section 221-B
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 221-b. Definitions. 1. Banking institution. The term "banking\ninstitution", when used in this article, shall mean any entity\nauthorized by its charter to accept deposits and to make loans.\n  2. Foreign banking corporation. The term "foreign banking\ncorporation", when used in this article, shall mean any banking\ninstitution organized under the laws of any jurisdiction other than the\nUnited States, any state of the United States or Puerto Rico.\n  3. Representative. The term "representative" shall mean any person or\nentity engaging in any activity in this state for or on behalf of a\nforeign banking corporation, provided that such activity is not\notherwise permitted by law.\n  4. The superintendent shall be authorized to exempt from the above\ndefinitions such additional persons, entities, activities or classes\nthereof which shall be deemed appropriate in order to effectuate the\npurposes of this article.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 7802 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 78 / Section 7802
Parties
Status: in_force

§ 7802. Parties. (a) Definition of "body or officer". The expression\n"body or officer" includes every court, tribunal, board, corporation,\nofficer, or other person, or aggregation of persons, whose action may be\naffected by a proceeding under this article\n  (b) Persons whose terms of office have expired; successors.  Whenever\nnecessary to accomplish substantial justice, a proceeding under this\narticle may be maintained against an officer exercising judicial or\nquasi-judicial functions, or member of a body whose term of office has\nexpired. Any party may join the successor of such officer or member of a\nbody or other person having custody of the record of proceedings under\nreview.\n  (c) Prohibition in favor of another. Where the proceeding is brought\nto restrain a body or officer from proceeding without or in excess of\njurisdiction in favor of another, the latter shall be joined as a party.\n  (d) Other interested persons. The court may direct that notice of the\nproceeding be given to any person. It may allow other interested persons\nto intervene.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 2805-Q — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 28 / Section 2805-Q
Hospital visitation by domestic partner
Status: in_force

§ 2805-q. Hospital visitation by domestic partner.  1. No domestic\npartner or surrogate as defined by subdivision twenty-nine of section\ntwenty-nine hundred ninety-four-a of this chapter shall be denied any\nrights of visitation of his or her domestic partner or of the patient or\nresident for whom he or she is the surrogate, when such rights are\naccorded to spouses and next-of-kin at any hospital, nursing home or\nhealth care facility.\n  2. For purposes of this section only, "domestic partner" means a\nperson who, with respect to another person:\n  (a) is formally a party in a domestic partnership or similar\nrelationship with the other person, entered into pursuant to the laws of\nthe United States or of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction, or\nregistered as the domestic partner of the other person with any registry\nmaintained by the employer of either party or any state, municipality,\nor foreign jurisdiction; or\n  (b) is formally recognized as a beneficiary or covered person under\nthe other person's employment benefits or health insurance; or\n  (c) is dependent or mutually interdependent on the other person for\nsupport, as evidenced by the totality of the circumstances indicating a\nmutual intent to be domestic partners including but not limited to:\ncommon ownership or joint leasing of real or personal property; common\nhouseholding, shared income or shared expenses; children in common;\nsigns of intent to marry or become domestic partners under paragraph (a)\nor (b) of this subdivision; or the length of the personal relationship\nof the persons.\n  3. Each party to a domestic partnership shall be considered to be the\ndomestic partner of the other party. "Domestic partner" shall not\ninclude a person who is related to the other person by blood in a manner\nthat would bar marriage to the other person in New York state. "Domestic\npartner" also shall not include any person who is less than eighteen\nyears of age or who is the adopted child of the other person or who is\nrelated by blood in a manner that would bar marriage in New York state\nto a person who is the lawful spouse of the other person.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 208 — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 10 / Section 208
Members of police force to have one day rest in seven
Status: in_force

§ 208. Members of police force to have one day rest in seven.\nNotwithstanding the provisions of any general or special law, every\nmember of the police force in a city, county, town or village, except in\ncase of an emergency, shall be allowed at least twenty-four consecutive\nhours of rest in any calendar week, without diminution of the salary or\ncompensation as fixed by or pursuant to law. The term "emergency" within\nthe meaning of this section shall be deemed to mean and include, a\nnational war, a strike or riot, a conflagration, a general or special\nelection, a public celebration, and other like public emergencies\nrequiring attendance by the police force.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 343-Y*3 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 343-Y*3
Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the "Almond E
Status: in_force

* § 343-y. Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the\n"Almond E. Fisher Memorial Highway". All that portion of the state\nhighway system constituting state route nineteen beginning at the\nAllegany county line in the town of Hume, and continuing southerly along\nstate route nineteen to its intersection with Allegany County Road 3 in\nthe town of Hume, Allegany county, shall be designated and known as the\n"Almond E. Fisher Memorial Highway".\n  * NB There are 5 § 343-y's\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 430 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 4 / Part 2 / Section 430
Temporary order of protection
Status: in_force

§ 430. Temporary order of protection. (a) Upon the filing of a\npetition under this article, the court for good cause shown may issue a\ntemporary order of protection which may contain any of the provisions\nauthorized on the making of an order of protection under section four\nhundred forty-six.\n  (b) A temporary order of protection is not a finding of wrongdoing.\n  (c) The court may issue or extend a temporary order of protection ex\nparte or on notice simultaneously with the issuance of a warrant,\ndirecting that the respondent be arrested and brought before the court\npursuant to section four hundred twenty-eight of this article.\n
N.Y. MHY Law § 10.17 — New York Code / Act MHY / Title B / Article 10 / Section 10.17
Release of information authorized
Status: in_force

§ 10.17 Release of information authorized.\n  The commissioner is authorized to release information in accordance\nwith subparagraph (vii) of paragraph nine of subdivision (c) of section\n33.13 of this chapter to appropriate persons and entities when necessary\nto protect the public concerning a specific sex offender requiring civil\nmanagement under this article, and to release information in accordance\nwith subparagraph (viii) of paragraph nine of subdivision (c) of section\n33.13 of this chapter to the attorney general and case review panel when\nsuch persons or entities request such information in the exercise of\ntheir statutory functions, powers, and duties under this article.\n
N.Y. TCP Law § 100 — New York Code / Act TCP / Article 8 / Section 100
Definition
Status: in_force

§ 100. Definition. A freight terminal corporation is a corporation\norganized to supply, maintain and operate freight terminal facilities--\nincluding docks, wharves, bulkheads, basins, tugs, floats, lighters and\nother shipping, and wharfage and lighterage for the receipt, delivery,\nstorage or handling of freight; terminal warehousing, terminal ways,\nterminal stations and stores; and terminal factory and show room\nfacilities, including power, heat, light and machinery.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 660.20 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 3 / Title S / Article 660 / Section 660.20
Examination of witnesses conditionally; grounds for order
Status: in_force

§ 660.20  Examination of witnesses conditionally; grounds for order.\n  An order directing examination of a witness conditionally must be\nbased upon the ground that there is reasonable cause to believe that\nsuch witness:\n  1.  Possesses information material to the criminal action or\nproceeding in issue; and\n  2.  Will not be amenable or responsive to legal process or available\nas a witness at a time when his testimony will be sought, either because\nhe is:\n  (a)  About to leave the state and not return for a substantial period\nof time; or\n  (b)  Physically ill or incapacited.\n
N.Y. SCC Law § 42 — New York Code / Act SCC / Article 4 / Section 42
Penalties for violation of ordinances
Status: in_force

§ 42. Penalties for violation of ordinances. Any person violating an\nordinance of the common council shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, except\nthat an ordinance may provide that a violation thereof shall be an\noffense, and the common council may provide therein or by general\nordinance, that any person guilty of such violation shall be liable to a\nfine which shall not exceed one hundred and fifty dollars in amount, or\nto imprisonment not exceeding one hundred and fifty days, or to both\nsuch fine and imprisonment, or such ordinance may provide for a penalty,\nnot exceeding five hundred dollars to be recovered by the city in a\ncivil action. The city may maintain an action or proceeding in a court\nof competent jurisdiction to compel compliance with, or to restrain by\ninjunction the violation of, any ordinance of the common council or of\nthe commissioner of public safety, notwithstanding that the ordinance\nmay provide a penalty for such violation.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 214-M — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 17 / Section 214-M
Labeling of certain food products
Status: in_force

§ 214-m. Labeling of certain food products. If any person, firm,\ncorporation, partnership, association or any other business association\nwhich processes, manufactures or imports food products has placed upon\nor accompanying the shipping container, shipping case, pallet or invoice\nof such food products, any information, whether in coded form or\notherwise, which specifies the expiration, "use by" date or similar\ndate; or the lot, batch, date of manufacture or processing or other\ninformation regarding the identity of the food product; it shall be\nunlawful to willfully alter, mutilate, destroy, obliterate or remove\nsuch information other than in connection with the destruction of the\nentire shipping container, shipping case, pallet or invoice. The\nprovisions of this section and any regulations promulgated hereunder\nshall not be deemed to require any manufacturer, processor or importer\nof food products to so label any food product prior to distribution in\nthe state or to prevent a manufacturer, processor or importer of food\nproducts from correcting or causing to be corrected any of the\ninformation accompanying the shipping container, shipping case, pallet\nor invoice. The provisions of this section shall not affect any\nprovision of federal, state or local law, ordinance, rule or regulation\nregarding the placing of an expiration or "use by" date on the retail\ncontainer of any food product.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 757 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 19 / Section 757
Application to punish for contempt committed before referee
Status: in_force

§ 757. Application to punish for contempt committed before referee.\nWhere the offense is committed upon the trial of an issue referred to a\nreferee appointed by the court, or consists of a witness's\nnon-attendance, or refusal to be sworn or testify, before him, the\napplication prescribed in this section may be made returnable before him\nor before the court. The application shall contain on its face a notice\nthat the purpose of the hearing is to punish the accused for a contempt\nof court, and that such punishment may consist of fine or imprisonment,\nor both, according to law.\n
N.Y. LIE Law § 154 — New York Code / Act LIE / Article 6-A / Section 154
Sale procedure for mold lien property
Status: in_force

§ 154. Sale procedure for mold lien property. 1. Before a molder may\nsell the die, mold, form or pattern the molder shall notify the customer\nand the holder of a perfected security interest by registered mail,\nreturn receipt requested. This notice shall include the following\ninformation:\n  (a) The molder's intention to sell the die, mold, form or pattern\nthirty days after the customer's receipt of the notice.\n  (b) A description of the die, mold, form or pattern to be sold.\n  (c) The time and place of the sale.\n  (d) An itemized statement for the amount due.\n  (e) The notice shall state that if a customer disputes the amount\nclaimed under the lien, the customer is entitled to bring a proceeding\nhereunder within ten days of the service of the notice of sale to\nestablish the amount of the lien. The proceeding may be brought in any\ncourt which would have jurisdiction to render a judgment for a sum equal\nto the amount of the lien.\n  2. If there is not a return of the receipt of the mailing or if the\npostal service returns the notice as being nondeliverable, the molder\nshall publish notice of the molder's intention to sell the die, mold,\nform or pattern in a newspaper of general circulation in the customer's\nlast known place of business. The notice shall include a description of\nthe die, mold, form or pattern.\n  3. If the sale is for a sum greater than the amount of the lien, the\nexcess shall be paid to any other lienholder known to the molder at the\ntime of the sale and any remainder to the customer, if the customer's\naddress is known, or the state treasurer for deposit in the general fund\nif the customer's address is unknown to the molder at the time of the\nsale.\n  4. A sale shall not be made under this section if it would be a\nviolation of any right of the customer under federal patent or copyright\nlaw.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 1210 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 12 / Section 1210
By-laws of domestic stock life insurance companies
Status: in_force

§ 1210. By-laws of domestic stock life insurance companies. No by-law\nor amendment or repeal of a by-law of any domestic stock life insurance\ncompany shall be effective until approved by the superintendent. The\nsuperintendent may refuse such approval if he finds that such by-law or\namendment or repeal does not conform with the requirements of law, or is\nnot equitable to the company's policyholders, or is inconsistent with\nthe objects and purposes of such company.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 183 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 9 / Section 183
Seats and pews to be free
Status: in_force

§ 183. Seats and pews to be free. The seats and pews in every church,\nbuilding or edifice, owned or occupied by any corporation organized\nunder this article, shall be forever free for the occupation and use,\nduring public worship, of all persons choosing to occupy the same, and\nconducting themselves with propriety, and no rent, charge or exaction\nshall ever be made or demanded for such occupation or use.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 2850 — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 28-A / Section 2850
Short title
Status: in_force

§ 2850. Short title. This article shall be known, and may be cited and\nreferred to as the "nursing home companies law".\n
N.Y. MRE Law § 11 — New York Code / Act MRE / Article 2 / Section 11
Old dwellings
Status: in_force

§ 11. Old dwellings. Except as required in section nine and articles\nthree and four, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require\nany change in the construction, use, or occupancy of any old or other\nexisting multiple dwelling occupied as such on July first, nineteen\nhundred fifty-two, which on such date is in compliance with the\nprovisions of all statutes, local laws, ordinances, rules and\nregulations applicable thereto.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 13 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 2 / Section 13
Maliciously serving process on Saturday on person who keeps Saturday as holy time
Status: in_force

§ 13. Maliciously serving process on Saturday on person who keeps\nSaturday as holy time.  Whoever maliciously procures any process in a\ncivil action to be served on Saturday, upon any person who keeps\nSaturday as holy time, and does not labor on that day, or serves upon\nhim any process returnable on that day, or maliciously procures any\ncivil action to which such person is a party to be adjourned to that day\nfor trial, is guilty of a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 3447 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 34 / Section 3447
Qualification of environmental remediation insurance for tax credit
Status: in_force

§ 3447. Qualification of environmental remediation insurance for tax\ncredit. (a) The superintendent of financial services is hereby\nauthorized to promulgate regulations relating to the certification of\npolicies of insurance which qualify for the environmental remediation\ninsurance tax credit provided for under section twenty-three of the tax\nlaw. Such tax credit shall only apply against a portion of the premium\npaid for coverage provided under subsection (b) of this section.\n  (b) In order to qualify for the environmental remediation insurance\ntax credit provided for under section twenty-three of the tax law, the\ninsurance must be written pursuant to the provisions of paragraph\nthirteen or fourteen of subsection (a) of section one thousand one\nhundred thirteen of this chapter and contain any of the following\ncoverages or substantially similar coverages or combination of\ncoverages:\n  (1) coverage for the costs of on-site clean-up of pre-existing\npollution conditions from the insured property which are outside the\nscope of the remedial work plan pursuant to section 27-1411 of the\nenvironmental conservation law for such insured property;\n  (2) coverage for third-party claims for on-site bodily injury and\nproperty damage resulting from pre-existing pollution conditions outside\nthe scope of such remedial work plan for the insured property;\n  (3) coverage which caps clean-up costs relating to such remedial work\nplan; and\n  (4) coverage for the costs of state re-openers pursuant to section\n27-1421 of the environmental conservation law or modifications to such\nremedial work plan to fill any gap in any liability limitation provided\npursuant to section 27-1421 of the environmental conservation law for\nenvironmental conditions.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 180.45 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title K / Article 180 / Section 180.45
Sports bribe receiving
Status: in_force

§ 180.45 Sports bribe receiving.\n  A person is guilty of sports bribe receiving when:\n  1. Being a sports participant, he solicits, accepts or agrees to\naccept any benefit from another person upon an agreement or\nunderstanding that he will thereby be influenced not to give his best\nefforts in a sports contest; or\n  2. Being a sports official, he solicits, accepts or agrees to accept\nany benefit from another person upon an agreement or understanding that\nhe will perform his duties improperly.\n  Sports bribe receiving is a class E felony.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 301 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 16 / Section 301
Application for incorporation
Status: in_force

§ 301. Application for incorporation. An unincorporated Spiritualist\nchurch may apply to the National Spiritualist Association for permission\nto incorporate under this article, which written permission granted by\nthe board of trustees of the National Spiritualist Association shall be\nattached to and become a part of the certificate of incorporation.\n
N.Y. DCD Law § 130 — New York Code / Act DCD / Article 5 / Section 130
Proceedings on adjourned day
Status: in_force

§ 130. Proceedings on adjourned day. An objection to a matter of form\nshall not be received upon an adjourned day; and, unless the opposing\ncreditor satisfies the court that the proceedings on the part of the\npetitioner are not just and fair, the court must direct an assignment,\nas prescribed in the last section but one, and must grant a discharge,\nas prescribed in the following sections of this article.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 2-A-505 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 2-A / Part 5 / Section 2-A-505
Cancellation and Termination and Effect of Cancellation, Termination, Rescission, or Fraud on Rights and Remedies
Status: in_force

Section 2-A-505. Cancellation and Termination and Effect of\n                   Cancellation, Termination, Rescission, or Fraud on\n                   Rights and Remedies.\n  (1) On cancellation of the lease contract, all obligations that are\nstill executory on both sides are discharged, but any right based on\nprior default or performance survives, and the cancelling party also\nretains any remedy for default of the whole lease contract or any\nunperformed balance.\n  (2) On termination of the lease contract, all obligations that are\nstill executory on both sides are discharged but any right based on\nprior default or performance survives.\n  (3) Unless the contrary intention clearly appears, expressions of\n"cancellation," "rescission," or the like of the lease contract may not\nbe construed as a renunciation or discharge of any claim in damages for\nan antecedent default.\n  (4) Rights and remedies for material misrepresentation or fraud\ninclude all rights and remedies available under this Article for\ndefault.\n  (5) Neither rescission nor a claim for rescission of the lease\ncontract nor rejection or return of the goods may bar or be deemed\ninconsistent with a claim for damages or other right or remedy.\n