FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. VIL Law § 2-200 — New York Code / Act VIL / Article 2 / Section 2-200
Population and area requirements
Status: in_force

§ 2-200 Population and area requirements. 1. A territory containing a\npopulation of at least one thousand five hundred persons who are regular\ninhabitants thereof, as hereinafter defined, may be incorporated as a\nvillage under this chapter provided such territory does not include a\npart of a city or village and further provided the limits of such\nterritory:\n  a. do not contain more than five square miles; or\n  b. are coterminous with the entire boundaries of a school, fire, fire\nprotection, fire alarm, town special or town improvement district; or\n  c. are coterminous with parts of the boundaries of more than one\nschool, fire, fire protection, fire alarm, town special or town\nimprovement district, all of which are wholly contained within such\nlimits and within one town; or\n  d. are coterminous with the entire boundaries of a town.\n  2. Definitions. a. "Regular inhabitants" as used herein and for the\npurpose of this article shall include all persons residing in the\nterritory proposed to be incorporated except such persons who\nthemselves, or who are persons under the age of eighteen years residing\nwith persons who, maintain a residence outside such territory which is\nused as their address for purposes of voting.\n  b. "Commission" as used herein and for the purposes of this article\nshall mean the village incorporation commission, as established by\nsection 2-260 of this article.\n  c. "Secretary" as used herein and for the purposes of this article\nshall mean the secretary of state.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 907 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 9 / Section 907
Pleadings; subsequent pleading containing cause of action
Status: in_force

§ 907. Pleadings; subsequent pleading containing cause of action.\n  (a) Counterclaim. The plaintiff may reply to a counterclaim but shall\nnot be required to do so except by court order. If the plaintiff elects\nvoluntarily to reply, he shall do so within ten days after service of\nthe answer containing the counterclaim. In the absence of a reply the\nallegations of the counterclaim shall be deemed denied by the plaintiff.\nAn answer containing a counterclaim against the plaintiff and another\nperson shall be replied to by such other person, as required by CPLR §\n3019(d), within the time provided in § 402 of this act, based upon the\ntime and method of service.\n  (b) Cross-claim. A cross-claim shall be answered within ten days after\nthe answer containing it is served.\n  (c) Third-party claim and claim by defendant stakeholder. A\nthird-party complaint, and an interpleader complaint served by a\ndefendant stakeholder under CPLR § 1006(b), shall be answered within the\ntime provided in § 402 of this act, based upon the time and method of\nservice.\n
N.Y. NAV Law § 32-E — New York Code / Act NAV / Article 3 / Section 32-E
Restriction and regulation of structures in certain towns and villages in the county of Niagara
Status: in_force

§ 32-e. Restriction and regulation of structures in certain towns and\nvillages in the county of Niagara. The local legislative body of the\ntowns of Lewiston and Porter and the villages of Youngstown and Lewiston\nfor the purpose of responsible shoreline management, may adopt, amend\nand enforce local laws, rules and regulations not inconsistent with the\nlaws of this state or of the United States, with respect to the\nrestriction and regulation of the manner of construction and location of\nstructures in the Niagara River within or bounding the towns of Lewiston\nand Porter and the villages of Youngstown and Lewiston to a distance of\none-half the width of the river or up to the United States-Canadian\nborder. Structures may include boathouses, wharfs, piers, docks, jetties\nor other types of structures which are non-permanent in nature or which\nare otherwise not subject to permit requirements.\n
N.Y. EPT Law § 4-1.5 — New York Code / Act EPT / Article 4 / Part 1 / Section 4-1.5
Other disqualifications
Status: in_force

§ 4-1.5 Other disqualifications\n  No estate property, whether passing by intestacy or otherwise, which\nhas its situs in this state, shall pass to any other state or territory\nof the United States, or to any foreign country or sovereignty in the\nevent of the absence of an individual heir, distributee, legatee or\nowner of said property, but shall pass as abandoned property to the\nstate of New York, and shall be held as such property pursuant to the\nabandoned property law.\n
N.Y. MIL Law § 130.45 — New York Code / Act MIL / Article 7 / Part 7 / Section 130.45
Pleas of the accused
Status: in_force

§ 130.45. Pleas of the accused.  (a) If an accused after arraignment\nmakes any irregular pleading, or after a plea of guilty sets up matter\ninconsistent with the plea, or if it appears that he has entered the\nplea of guilty improvidently or through lack of understanding of its\nmeaning and effect, or if he fails or refuses to plead, a plea of not\nguilty shall be entered in the record and the court shall proceed as\nthough he had pleaded not guilty.\n  (b) With respect to any charge or specification to which a plea of\nguilty has been made by the accused and accepted by the military judge\nor by a court-martial without a military judge, a finding of guilty of\nthe charge or specification may, if permitted by regulations issued\npursuant to this chapter, be entered immediately without vote. This\nfinding shall constitute the finding of the court unless the plea of\nguilty is withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence, in which\nevent the proceeding shall continue as though the accused had pleaded\nnot guilty.\n
N.Y. BVO Law § 7-A — New York Code / Act BVO / Article 2 / Section 7-A
Consolidation
Status: in_force

§ 7-a. Consolidation. Any two or more of the bodies enumerated in the\npreceding section, having the same parent governing body, organized\nunder section two of this chapter may consolidate by taking such action\nat any regular communication, convocation, encampment or other regular\nmeeting thereof, by whatever name known, held in accordance with the\nconstitution and general rules and regulations of the governing body to\nwhich it is subordinate, and in conformity to its own by-laws, and shall\nthereupon proceed to effect such organization in the manner provided for\nin section two, as if neither body had heretofore been organized under\nits provisions. When the certificate required to be filed by such body\nin the office of the secretary of state under the provisions of this\narticle shall be so filed such separate bodies shall thereupon become\none body, and all the temporalities, and property, whether real or\npersonal, now vested in the trustees of each of the bodies so\nconsolidated, in accordance with the provisions of section three of this\nchapter shall be vested in the trustees of the body formed by the\nconsolidation, which shall be subject to all the liabilities of the\nformer bodies to the same extent as if such liabilities had been\ncontracted or incurred by it.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 321 — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 15-B / Section 321
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 321. Definitions. The following terms as used in this article shall\nhave the following meanings.\n  1. "Board" shall mean the board of directors of the institute.\n  2. "Institute" shall mean the New York state Martin Luther King, Jr.\ninstitute for nonviolence established by section three hundred\ntwenty-two of this article.\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 939 — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 24 / Section 939
Medical assistants in counties of New York and Kings
Status: in_force

§ 939. Medical assistants in counties of New York and Kings.  The\ndistrict attorneys of the county of New York and of the county of Kings\nare each authorized and empowered to appoint and at pleasure to remove a\nmedical assistant, who shall be a physician and surgeon, resident of the\ncounty in which he is appointed, and who shall have been for at least\nten years duly licensed to practice medicine in this state. It shall be\nthe duty of such medical assistant, under the supervision and direction\nof the district attorney, to examine into and report on all cases of\nsuspicious, sudden and unusual death and wounding within the county, and\nto perform such duties as the district attorney may direct in connection\nwith the official duties of such district attorney in the enforcement\nand administration of the criminal laws. Such medical assistant shall\nhave the power and authority, whenever so directed by the district\nattorney, to dissect, perform an autopsy upon, or attend an autopsy upon\nany dead body of a human being. The salaries of the medical assistants\nof the county of New York and of the county of Kings shall be fixed and\ndetermined by the district attorney of New York county and the board of\nestimate, respectively, and shall be county charges.\n
N.Y. RRD Law § 192-A — New York Code / Act RRD / Article 5 / Section 192-A
Relocation of tracks
Status: in_force

§ 192-a. Relocation of tracks.  In any city having a population of one\nmillion or more, the board of estimate of such city, or if there be no\nboard of estimate, the local authorities of such city having control of\nthe streets shall have the power to apply to the commissioner of\ntransportation for an order directing any street railroad corporation to\nchange the location of its tracks within any street or highway forming a\npart of its route in a borough of such city containing not less than\nthree hundred thousand or more than six hundred thousand inhabitants,\nwhere in the judgment of such commissioner of transportation the\nrelocation of such tracks is necessary in connection with the\nmaintenance, widening, change of grade, setting back of curb lines or\nother proper improvement of such street or highway. Any street railroad\ncorporation operating as aforesaid, shall, at such time as the\ncommissioner of transportation shall direct, start work upon the change\nof the location of its tracks to the place and in the manner directed by\nthe commissioner of transportation and shall complete such change within\na reasonable time thereafter. The relocation of any track in accordance\nwith the provisions of this section shall not limit, change or in any\nwise affect or prejudice the existing rights or franchises of any street\nrailroad corporation, and such corporation shall have the same right to\noperate its railroad on the relocated route in the same manner and to\nthe same extent as it had the right so to do on the original route.\n  The cost and expense of the relocation of such railroad tracks shall\nbe imposed and borne in such manner as the commissioner of\ntransportation may determine before, during or subsequent to such\nrelocation. In determining such cost and expense, such commissioner of\ntransportation may take into consideration the fact that such road was\nlocated before such street was laid out.\n
N.Y. NPC Law § 1107 — New York Code / Act NPC / Article 11 / Section 1107
Hearing and decision
Status: in_force

§ 1107. Hearing and decision.\n  At the time and place specified in the order to show cause, or at any\nother time and place to which the hearing is adjourned, the court or the\nreferee shall hear the allegations and proofs of the parties and\ndetermine the facts.  The decision of the court or the report of the\nreferee shall be made and filed with the clerk of the court with all\nconvenient speed.\n
N.Y. TRA Law § 68 — New York Code / Act TRA / Article 2-D / Section 68
Disposal of records
Status: in_force

§ 68. Disposal of records. 1. Notwithstanding the provisions of any\ngeneral, special or local law, the Utica transit authority or officer or\nemployee thereof is hereby empowered to destroy, sell or otherwise\ndispose of any book, paper, map photograph, microphotograph or other\nrecord regardless of its physical form or characteristic, which has been\nmade, acquired, or received or is now in its custody and which the Utica\ntransit authority determines no longer has sufficient administrative,\nlegal, fiscal, research or historical value to warrant its continued\nretention and preservation, provided the Utica transit authority\nauthorizes such destruction, sale or other disposition.\n  2. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the following\nrecords of the Utica transit authority unless copies for retention are\nreproduced as provided in section sixty-nine of this article:\n  (a) The official copy of the minutes of the Utica transit authority\nincluding appendices and attachments thereto.\n  (b) The official copy of any annual report of the Utica transit\nauthority to the commissioner.\n  (c) Records which have not been retained for such period of time as\nmay be required:\n  (1) by the federal government or any of its agencies;\n  (2) by rules and regulations of the state comptroller;\n  (3) by rules and regulations of the commissioner.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 690 — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 16 / Section 690
Short title
Status: in_force

§ 690. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited and\nreferred to as the "urban development action area act".\n
N.Y. LIE Law § 185 — New York Code / Act LIE / Article 8 / Section 185
Lien of manufacturers and throwsters of silk goods
Status: in_force

§ 185. Lien of manufacturers and throwsters of silk goods. All persons\nor corporations engaged in the business of manufacturing, spinning or\nthrowing silk into yarn or other goods, shall be entitled to a lien upon\nthe goods and property of others in their possession for the amount of\nany account that may be due them, from the owners of such silk, by\nreason of any work and labor performed, and materials furnished in or\nabout the manufacturing, spinning or throwing of the same, or other\ngoods, of such owner or owners. Such lien shall not be waived or\nimpaired by the taking of any note or notes for the moneys so due, or\nfor the work and labor performed and materials furnished.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 190-B — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 7 / Section 190-B
Power of county court and county judge co-extensive with that of supreme court and supreme court justice
Status: in_force

§ 190-b. Power of county court and county judge co-extensive with that\nof supreme court and supreme court justice. 1. Where a county court has\njurisdiction of an action or a special proceeding, it possesses the same\njurisdiction, power and authority in and over the same, and in the\ncourse of the proceedings therein, that the supreme court possesses in a\nlike case; and it may render any judgment or grant either party any\nrelief that the supreme court may render or grant in a like case, and\nmay send its process and other mandates into any county of the state for\nservice or execution and enforce obedience thereto in the same manner as\nthe supreme court.\n  2. The county judge possesses the same power and authority in such\naction or special proceeding that a justice of the supreme court\npossesses in a like action or special proceeding brought in the supreme\ncourt.\n  3. The county judge possesses the same power and authority in a\nspecial proceeding which can be lawfully instituted before him out of\ncourt that a justice of the supreme court possesses in a like special\nproceeding instituted before him out of court.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 758-A — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 7 / Part 5 / Section 758-A
Restitution
Status: in_force

§ 758-a. Restitution. 1. In cases involving acts of children over\ntwelve and less than eighteen years of age, the court may\n  (a) recommend as a condition of placement, or order as a condition of\nprobation or suspended judgment, restitution in an amount representing a\nfair and reasonable cost to replace the property or repair the damage\ncaused by the child, not, however, to exceed one thousand dollars. The\ncourt may require that the child pay out of his or her own funds or\nearnings the amount of replacement or damage, either in a lump sum or in\nperiodic payments in amounts set by the court; and/or\n  (b) order as a condition of placement, probation, or suspended\njudgment, services for the public good including in the case of a crime\ninvolving willful, malicious, or unlawful damage or destruction to real\nor personal property maintained as a cemetery plot, grave, burial place,\nor other place of interment of human remains, services for the\nmaintenance and repair thereof, taking into consideration the age and\nphysical condition of the child.\n  2. If the court recommends restitution or requires services for the\npublic good in conjunction with an order of placement pursuant to\nsection seven hundred fifty-six, the placement shall be made only to an\nauthorized agency which has adopted rules and regulations for the\nsupervision of such a program, which rules and regulations shall be\nsubject to the approval of the state department of social services. Such\nrules and regulations shall include, but not be limited to provisions\n(i) assuring that the conditions of work, including wages, meet the\nstandards therefor prescribed pursuant to the labor law; (ii) affording\ncoverage to the child under the workers' compensation law as an employee\nof such agency, department or institution; (iii) assuring that the\nentity receiving such services shall not utilize the same to replace its\nregular employees; and (iv) providing for reports to the court not less\nfrequently than every six months, unless the order provides otherwise.\n  3. If the court requires restitution or services for the public good\nas a condition of probation or suspended judgment, it shall provide that\nan agency or person supervise the restitution or services and that such\nagency or person report to the court not less frequently than every six\nmonths, unless the order provides otherwise. Upon the written notice\nsent by a school district to the court and the appropriate probation\ndepartment or agency which submits probation recommendations or reports\nto the court, the court may provide that such school district shall\nsupervise the performance of services for the public good.\n  4. The court, upon receipt of the reports provided for in subdivision\ntwo of this section may, on its own motion or the motion of any party or\nthe agency, hold a hearing to determine whether the placement should be\naltered or modified.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 225.95 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title M / Article 225 / Section 225.95
Unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, marking, altering or modification of equipment and devices associated with gaming
Status: in_force

§ 225.95 Unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, marking, altering or\n           modification of equipment and devices associated with gaming.\n  A person is guilty of unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution,\nmarking, altering or modification of equipment and devices associated\nwith gaming when if he or she:\n  1. Manufactures, sells or distributes any cards, chips, cheques,\ntokens, dice, vouchers, game or device and he or she knew or reasonably\nshould have known it was intended to be used to violate any provision of\nthis article; or\n  2. Marks, alters or otherwise modifies any associated gaming equipment\nor device in a manner that either affects the result of the wager by\ndetermining win or loss or alters the normal criteria of random\nselection in a manner that affects the operation of a game or determines\nthe outcome of a game, and he or she knew or reasonably should have\nknown that it was intended to be used to violate any provision of this\narticle.\n  Unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, marking, altering or\nmodification of equipment and devices associated with gaming is a class\nA misdemeanor provided, however, that if the person has previously been\nconvicted of this crime within the past five years this crim shall be a\nclass E felony.\n
N.Y. CCA Law § 202 — New York Code / Act CCA / Article 2 / Section 202
Money actions and actions involving chattels
Status: in_force

§ 202. Money actions and actions involving chattels. The court shall\nhave jurisdiction of actions and proceedings for the recovery of money,\nactions and proceedings for the recovery of chattels and actions and\nproceedings for the foreclosure of liens on personal property where the\namount sought to be recovered or the value of the property does not\nexceed $50,000.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 9-107B — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 9 / Part 1 / Subpart 1 / Section 9-107B
No Requirement to Acknowledge or Confirm; No Duties
Status: in_force

Section 9--107B. No Requirement to Acknowledge or Confirm; No Duties.\n  (a) No requirement to acknowledge. A person that has control under\nSection 9--104, 9--105, or 9--105A is not required to acknowledge that\nit has control on behalf of another person.\n  (b) No duties or confirmation. If a person acknowledges that it has or\nwill obtain control on behalf of another person, unless the person\notherwise agrees or law other than this article otherwise provides, the\nperson does not owe any duty to the other person and is not required to\nconfirm the acknowledgment to any other person.\n
N.Y. TWN Law § 196 — New York Code / Act TWN / Article 12 / Section 196
Modification of plans for sewer, wastewater disposal, drainage, water or water quality treatment districts
Status: in_force

§ 196. Modification of plans for sewer, wastewater disposal, drainage,\nwater or water quality treatment districts. 1. When the town board shall\nhave established a sewer, wastewater disposal, drainage, water or water\nquality treatment district and adopted a plan of sewerage, wastewater\ndisposal, drainage, water or water quality treatment system for such\ndistrict, such plan shall not be modified by the board, nor by any\nofficer of the town, except after public notice given by publication in\nthe official paper of intention to modify the same, which notice shall\nspecify the particulars in which it is proposed to modify it, and a time\nand place when the board will consider any objections which may be made\nthereto, which time shall not be less than ten nor more than twenty days\nafter the first publication of said notice. When any change shall be\nmade in the plan proposed and once adopted, a revised or additional map\nand profile shall be made showing the change, and all such maps and\nprofiles shall be carefully preserved in the office of the town clerk\nand open to inspection by all persons interested.\n  2. In the case of water quality treatment districts, amendments or\nmodifications of plans must have the written approval of the department\nof health prior to adoption. At the request of an owner of a parcel of\nproperty within the town, if the private well water on such property is\ncontaminated, a water quality treatment district plan may be amended,\nfrom time to time, to include said parcel of property. If an owner of a\nparcel of property within the town requests exclusion from the district,\nsuch request shall be granted without the state department of health\napproval. The removal of a parcel of property from a district shall in\nno way affect the owner's liability for charges which have accrued\nagainst the owner's property, prior to said exclusion, for the\nprocurement, installation, modification, replacement and removal of a\nwater quality treatment unit or device or for expenses of operation and\nmaintenance including monitoring, testing, regenerating and treating.\nShould a public or private water system, supplier or authority commence\nsupplying water to any parcel of property within a water quality\ntreatment district, such parcel of property shall no longer be\nconsidered part of the water quality treatment district, and all\nservices to such parcels shall be terminated. Termination of services\nshall include, the removal of all water quality treatment units or\ndevices and a charge for the cost of doing so to the benefited property,\nexcept when such unit or device was acquired and owned by the property\nowner or when the district determines that such unit or device is\nobsolete and no longer useful for any district purpose.\n