N.Y. CPL Law § 470.15 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title M / Article 470 / Section 470.15
Determination of appeals by intermediate appellate courts; scope of review
Status: in_force

§ 470.15 Determination of appeals by intermediate appellate courts;\n             scope of review.\n  1. Upon an appeal to an intermediate appellate court from a judgment,\nsentence or order of a criminal court, such intermediate appellate court\nmay consider and determine any question of law or issue of fact\ninvolving error or defect in the criminal court proceedings which may\nhave adversely affected the appellant.\n  2. Upon such an appeal, the intermediate appellate court must either\naffirm or reverse or modify the criminal court judgment, sentence or\norder. The ways in which it may modify a judgment include, but are not\nlimited to, the following:\n  (a) Upon a determination that the trial evidence adduced in support of\na verdict is not legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt\nof an offense of which he was convicted but is legally sufficient to\nestablish his guilt of a lesser included offense, the court may modify\nthe judgment by changing it to one of conviction for the lesser offense;\n  (b) Upon a determination that the trial evidence is not legally\nsufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of all the offenses of\nwhich he was convicted but is legally sufficient to establish his guilt\nof one or more of such offenses, the court may modify the judgment by\nreversing it with respect to the unsupported counts and otherwise\naffirming it;\n  (c) Upon a determination that a sentence imposed upon a valid\nconviction is illegal or unduly harsh or severe, the court may modify\nthe judgment by reversing it with respect to the sentence and by\notherwise affirming it.\n  3. A reversal or a modification of a judgment, sentence or order must\nbe based upon a determination made:\n  (a) Upon the law; or\n  (b) Upon the facts; or\n  (c) As a matter of discretion in the interest of justice; or\n  (d) Upon any two or all three of the bases specified in paragraphs\n(a), (b) and (c).\n  4. The kinds of determinations of reversal or modification deemed to\nbe upon the law include, but are not limited to, the following:\n  (a) That a ruling or instruction of the court, duly protested by the\ndefendant, as prescribed in subdivision two of section 470.05, at a\ntrial resulting in a judgment, deprived the defendant of a fair trial;\n  (b) That evidence adduced at a trial resulting in a judgment was not\nlegally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of an offense of\nwhich he was convicted;\n  (c) That a sentence was unauthorized, illegally imposed or otherwise\ninvalid as a matter of law.\n  5. The kinds of determinations of reversal or modification deemed to\nbe on the facts include, but are not limited to, a determination that a\nverdict of conviction resulting in a judgment was, in whole or in part,\nagainst the weight of the evidence.\n  6. The kinds of determinations of reversal or modification deemed to\nbe made as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice include,\nbut are not limited to, the following:\n  (a) That an error or defect occurring at a trial resulting in a\njudgment, which error or defect was not duly protested at trial as\nprescribed in subdivision two of section 470.05 so as to present a\nquestion of law, deprived the defendant of a fair trial;\n  (b) That a sentence, though legal, was unduly harsh or severe.\n