FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. RCO Law § 113 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 6 / Section 113
Consistory of a Reformed church in America; minister, how chosen
Status: in_force

§ 113. Consistory of a Reformed church in America; minister, how\nchosen. Any church in connection with the Reformed church in America,\nthe choice or election of the members of whose consistory is not subject\nto the ecclesiastical rules or jurisdiction of such Reformed church in\nAmerica, shall, if the consistory so determine, be subject to such rules\nand jurisdiction; and thereafter the choice of the members of the\nconsistory shall be in accordance with such rules and practices.\n  If any such church be incorporated under article ten of this chapter,\nor if its trustees be elective in pursuance of such article, its board\nof trustees and its consistory shall act concurrently in the choice of\nits minister.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 406 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 13 / Section 406
Sheriff, deputy or constable must act as crier when directed by court
Status: in_force

§ 406. Sheriff, deputy or constable must act as crier when directed by\ncourt. A sheriff, deputy sheriff, or constable, attending a term of a\ncourt of record, must, when required by the court, act as crier therein;\nand he is not entitled to any additional compensation for that service.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 190 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 10 / Section 190
Application of this article
Status: in_force

§ 190. Application of this article.  This article is not applicable to\na Baptist church, a Congregational Christian church, whether or not a\npart of the United Church of Christ, a church of the United Church of\nChrist incorporated after September first, nineteen hundred seventy-one,\nan Independent church, a United Methodist church, a Protestant Episcopal\nchurch, a Roman Catholic church, a Presbyterian church in connection\nwith the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United\nStates of America, a Christian Orthodox Catholic church of the Eastern\nConfession, a Ruthenian Greek Catholic church, or a Church of Christ,\nScientist. No provision of this article is applicable to a reformed\nchurch in America, a True Reformed Dutch church in the United States of\nAmerica, a Reformed Presbyterian church, or to an Evangelical Lutheran\nchurch, incorporated after October first, eighteen hundred and\nninety-five, except as declared to be so applicable by article six of\nthis chapter; this article is applicable to an Evangelical Lutheran\nchurch incorporated before October first, eighteen hundred ninety-five,\nif the trustees thereof were then elective as such and so long as they\ncontinue to be elective as such. Article six of this chapter is\napplicable to an Evangelical Lutheran church incorporated before October\nfirst, eighteen hundred and ninety-five, if its trustees were not then\nelective as such and so long as its trustees continue not to be elective\nas such. This article is applicable to churches of all other\ndenominations.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 3004 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 30 / Section 3004
Where restoration of benefits before judgment unnecessary
Status: in_force

§ 3004. Where restoration of benefits before judgment unnecessary. A\nparty who has received benefits by reason of a transaction that is void\nor voidable because of fraud, misrepresentation, mistake, duress,\ninfancy or incompetency, and who, in an action or by way of defense or\ncounterclaim, seeks rescission, restitution, a declaration or judgment\nthat such transaction is void, or other relief, whether formerly\ndenominated legal or equitable, dependent upon a determination that such\ntransaction was void or voidable, shall not be denied relief because of\na failure to tender before judgment restoration of such benefits; but\nthe court may make a tender of restoration a condition of its judgment,\nand may otherwise in its judgment so adjust the equities between the\nparties that unjust enrichment is avoided.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 404 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 27 / Section 404
Rules and regulations
Status: in_force

§ 404. Rules and regulations. The secretary shall promulgate rules and\nregulations which establish standards for practice and operation by\nlicensees and trainees under this article in order to ensure the health,\nsafety and welfare of the public including licensees and trainees when\nthey are working within such establishments. Such rules and regulations\nshall include, but not be limited to, the sanitary conditions and\nprocedures required to be maintained, a minimum standard of training\nappropriate to the duties of nail specialists, trainees, waxers, natural\nhair stylists, estheticians, and cosmetologists and the provision of\nservice by nail specialists, trainees, waxers, natural hair stylists,\nestheticians or cosmetologists at remote locations other than the\nlicensee's home provided that such practitioner holds an appearance\nenhancement business license to operate at a fixed location or is\nemployed by the holder of an appearance enhancement business license.\nRegulations setting forth the educational requirements for nail\nspecialists and trainees shall include education in the area of causes\nof infection and bacteriology. Regulations setting forth the educational\nrequirements for cosmetologists or natural hair stylists shall include\neducation regarding the provision of services to individuals with all\nhair types and textures, including, but not limited to, various curl or\nwave patterns, hair strand thicknesses, and volumes of hair. In\npromulgating such rules and regulations the secretary shall consult with\nthe state education department, the advisory committee established\npursuant to this article, any other state agencies and private industry\nrepresentatives as may be appropriate in determining minimum training\nrequirements.\n
N.Y. TRA Law § 486 — New York Code / Act TRA / Article 22 / Section 486
Maintenance of records
Status: in_force

§ 486. Maintenance of records. In connection with each contract, the\ncommissioner and the municipality shall keep adequate records of the\namount of the payment by the state, the amount of federal assistance, if\nany, received by the municipality for the project, and of all moneys\nexpended by the municipality for such project. Such records required to\nbe kept by the commissioner shall establish the basis for recalculations\nof the state financial assistance as required herein. The commissioner\nshall have authority to carry out, or to cause to be carried out, audits\nof such contracts and records pursuant to rules and regulations\npromulgated by the commissioner.\n
N.Y. PAR Law § 35.15 — New York Code / Act PAR / Title G / Article 35 / Section 35.15
Preservation of heritage area resources
Status: in_force

§ 35.15 Preservation of heritage area resources. 1. The commissioner\nshall establish, with the advice of the advisory council and the local\nofficials from communities designated in section 35.03 of this article,\nstandards and criteria for preservation of resources within heritage\nareas. At least one public hearing shall be held to solicit comment on\nthe proposed standards and criteria prior to their adoption.\n  2. Concurrent with the approval of management plans the office shall\ndetermine that local governments in each heritage area have enacted\npreservation measures sufficient to insure that these standards shall be\nachieved.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 2402 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 23 / Section 2402
Justices of the peace abolished; powers and jurisdiction of police justices transferred
Status: in_force

* § 2402. Justices of the peace abolished; powers and jurisdiction of\npolice justices transferred. All the powers, duties and jurisdiction of\nthe justices of the peace in the several towns of the county are hereby\ntransferred to the district court of the county and the judges thereof,\nand the office of justice of the peace in the several towns of the\ncounty is abolished. All the powers, duties and jurisdiction of police\njustices of villages in the county, except as hereinafter provided, are\nhereby also transferred to the district court of the county and the\njudges thereof. The police justices of villages in the county shall have\njurisdiction of violations of the ordinances and other regulations of\nthe village and of violations of the vehicle and traffic law committed\nwithin the limits of the village, except in cases in which the charge is\noperating a motor vehicle or motor cycle while in an intoxicated\ncondition.\n  * NB There are 2 § 2402's\n
N.Y. CAN Law § 12 — New York Code / Act CAN / Article 2 / Section 12
Chief equity officer
Status: in_force

§ 12. Chief equity officer. The board, by an affirmative vote of at\nleast four members, shall appoint a chief equity officer. The chief\nequity officer shall receive an annual salary not to exceed an amount\nappropriated therefor by the legislature and their expenses actually and\nnecessarily incurred in the performance of official duties, unless\notherwise provided by the legislature.\n  1. The chief equity officer shall assist with the development and\nimplementation of, and ensure the cannabis control board and the office\nof cannabis management's continued compliance with, the social and\neconomic equity plan, required to be developed pursuant to article four\nof this chapter.\n  2. The chief equity officer shall establish public education\nprogramming dedicated to providing communities that have been impacted\nby cannabis prohibition with information detailing the licensing process\nand informing individuals of the support and resources that the office\ncan provide to individuals and entities interested in participating in\nactivity licensed under this chapter.\n  3. The chief equity officer shall provide a report to the board, no\nlater than January first, two thousand twenty-three, and annually\nthereafter, of their activities in ensuring compliance with the social\nand economic equity plan, required to be developed pursuant to article\nfour of this chapter, and the board shall provide such report to the\nlegislature.\n
N.Y. POA Law § 3-A — New York Code / Act POA / Section 3-A
No title
Status: in_force

§ 3-a. The comptroller of the state of New York shall, from time to\ntime but not less than once in every five years examine the books and\naccounts of such commission, including the receipts, disbursements,\ncontracts, leases, sinking funds, investment and any other matters\nrelating to its financial standing. In lieu of such an examination, the\nstate comptroller is hereby authorized to accept from such commission an\nexternal examination of its books and accounts made at its request.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 852 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 22 / Section 852
Compensation
Status: in_force

§ 852. Compensation. 1. For the performance of an assignment\nhereunder, each judicial hearing officer shall receive his actual and\nnecessary expenses thereby incurred plus compensation in an amount to be\nestablished by the chief administrator of the courts.  Such expenses and\ncompensation shall be state charges payable out of funds appropriated to\nthe administrative office for the courts for such purpose. A judicial\nhearing officer shall receive no other compensation for the performance\nof services in such capacity.\n  2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, where a person is a\n"retired person", as such term is defined in article seven of the\nretirement and social security law, service as a judicial hearing\nofficer shall be subject to the provisions of that article.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 720.25 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 3 / Title U / Article 720 / Section 720.25
Youthful offender adjudication; certain exemptions
Status: in_force

§ 720.25 Youthful offender adjudication; certain exemptions.\n  Notwithstanding any inconsistent provisions of law:\n  1. where the court is required to find that a person is a youthful\noffender pursuant to section 170.80 of this chapter, the fact that such\nperson has previously been convicted of a crime or adjudicated a\nyouthful offender shall not prevent such person from being adjudicated a\nyouthful offender as required by such section; and\n  2. a youthful offender adjudication pursuant to section 170.80 of this\nchapter shall not be considered in determining whether a person is an\neligible youth, or in determining whether to find a person a youthful\noffender, in any subsequent youthful offender adjudication.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 1449-Q — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 31-C / Section 1449-Q
Judicial review
Status: in_force

§ 1449-q. Judicial review. 1. Any final determination of the amount of\nany tax payable under section fourteen hundred forty-nine-h of this\narticle shall be reviewable for error, illegality or unconstitutionality\nor any other reason whatsoever by a proceeding under article\nseventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules if application\ntherefor is made to the supreme court within four months after the\ngiving of the notice of such final determination, provided, however,\nthat any such proceeding under article seventy-eight of the civil\npractice law and rules shall not be instituted unless (a) the amount of\nany tax sought to be reviewed, with such interest and penalties thereon\nas may be provided for by local law shall be first deposited and there\nis filed an undertaking, issued by a surety company authorized to\ntransact business in this state and approved by the superintendent of\nfinancial services of this state as to solvency and responsibility, in\nsuch amount as a justice of the supreme court shall approve to the\neffect that if such proceeding be dismissed or the tax confirmed the\npetitioner will pay all costs and charges which may accrue in the\nprosecution of such proceeding or (b) at the option of the petitioner,\nsuch undertaking may be in a sum sufficient to cover the taxes, interest\nand penalties stated in such determination, plus the costs and charges\nwhich may accrue against it in the prosecution of the proceeding, in\nwhich event the petitioner shall not be required to pay such taxes,\ninterest or penalties as a condition precedent to the application.\n  2. Where any tax imposed hereunder shall have been erroneously,\nillegally or unconstitutionally assessed or collected and application\nfor the refund or revision thereof duly made to the proper fiscal\nofficer or officers, and such officer or officers shall have made a\ndetermination denying such refund or revision, such determination shall\nbe reviewable by a proceeding under article seventy-eight of the civil\npractice law and rules; provided, however, that (a) such proceeding is\ninstituted within four months after the giving of the notice of such\ndenial, (b) a final determination of tax due was not previously made,\nand (c) an undertaking is filed with the proper fiscal officer or\nofficers in such amount and with such sureties as a justice of the\nsupreme court shall approve to the effect that if such proceeding be\ndismissed or the tax confirmed, the petitioner will pay all costs and\ncharges which may accrue in the prosecution of such proceeding.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 711-C — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 26 / Section 711-C
Cybersecurity incident reviews
Status: in_force

§ 711-c. Cybersecurity incident reviews. 1. Definitions. As used in\nthis section, the terms cybersecurity incident, cyber threat, cyber\nthreat indicator, defensive measure, information system, municipal\ncorporation, public authority, ransom payment and ransomware attack\nshall have the same meaning as such terms are defined in article\nnineteen-C of the general municipal law.\n  2. The commissioner, or their designees, shall review each\ncybersecurity incident report and notice and explanation of ransom\npayment submitted pursuant to sections nine hundred ninety-five-b and\nnine hundred ninety-five-c of the general municipal law to assess\npotential impacts of cybersecurity incidents and ransom payments on the\nhealth, safety, welfare or security of the state, or its residents.\n  3. The commissioner, or their designees, may work with appropriate\nstate agencies, federal law enforcement, and federal homeland security\nagencies to provide municipal corporations and public authorities with\nreports of cybersecurity incidents and trends, including but not limited\nto, to the maximum extent practicable, related contextual information,\ncyber threat indicators, and defensive measures. The commissioner may\ncoordinate and share such reported information with municipal\ncorporations, public authorities, state agencies, and federal law\nenforcement and homeland security agencies to respond to and mitigate\ncybersecurity threats.\n  4. Such reports, assessments, records, reviews, documents,\nrecommendations, guidance and any information contained or used in its\npreparation shall be exempt from disclosure under article six of the\npublic officers law.\n  5. No later than forty-eight hours after receiving a cybersecurity\nincident report containing a request for advice and/or technical\nassistance from the division pursuant to subdivision one of section nine\nhundred ninety-five-b of the general municipal law, the commissioner or\nthe commissioner's designees shall acknowledge receipt of such request.\nAs soon as possible after receiving such a request, the commissioner or\nthe commissioner's designees, subject to the commissioner's discretion\nin prioritizing the division's response to the municipal corporation's\nor public authority's cybersecurity incident report, shall provide\nadvice to the requesting municipal corporation or public authority and,\nto the extent practicable, provide technical assistance.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 1618 — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 34 / Section 1618
Special drawings
Status: in_force

§ 1618. Special drawings. a. General. The division may hold special\nprize drawings each of which shall guarantee as a first prize to the\nwinner or winners an amount of not less than fifty million dollars,\nincluding interest, such prize to be paid in a manner which the director\nshall determine.\n  b. Reports. The division shall produce and issue a report, in such\nformat as the director may prescribe, no more than sixty days after a\nprize drawing is held pursuant to subdivision a of this section. Such\nreport shall include at a minimum the following information pertaining\nto such drawing: (1) sales revenue and prize distributions to include\namounts available for future special drawings, (2) administrative costs\npaid or otherwise payable or distributed to agents, vendors and\ncontractors, (3) an analysis of the effect on sales of other game\ndrawings held during the period of time that tickets for a special prize\ndrawing were available to the public. A copy of such report will be\nprovided to the director of the budget, the chairman of the senate\nfinance committee and the chairman of the assembly ways and means\ncommittee.\n
N.Y. LLC Law § 414 — New York Code / Act LLC / Article 4 / Section 414
Removal or replacement of managers
Status: in_force

§ 414. Removal or replacement of managers. Except as provided in the\noperating agreement, any or all managers of a limited liability company\nmay be removed or replaced with or without cause by a vote of a majority\nin interest of the members entitled to vote thereon.\n
N.Y. LIE Law § 87 — New York Code / Act LIE / Article 4 / Section 87
Undertaking to accompany application
Status: in_force

§ 87. Undertaking to accompany application. Such application shall be\naccompanied by an undertaking in the sum of at least one hundred\ndollars, to be approved by such justice and filed in the office of the\nclerk of the county where the notice of lien is filed, with at least one\nsurety, who shall be a resident and freeholder within the state, to the\neffect that if it is finally adjudged that the applicant was not\nentitled to the warrant, he will pay all costs which may be awarded\nagainst him, not exceeding the amount specified in the undertaking, and\nany damages sustained by reason of the seizure of the vessel under such\nwarrant, not to exceed fifty dollars.\n
N.Y. MIL Law § 130.54 — New York Code / Act MIL / Article 7 / Part 7 / Section 130.54
Record of trial
Status: in_force

§ 130.54. Record of trial.  (a) Each general court-martial shall keep\na separate record of the proceedings in each case brought before it, and\nthe record shall be authenticated by the signature of the military\njudge.  If the record cannot be authenticated by the military judge by\nreason of his death, disability, or absence, it shall be authenticated\nby the signature of the trial counsel or by that of a member if the\ntrial counsel is unable to authenticate it by reason of his death,\ndisability, or absence. In a court-martial consisting of only a military\njudge the record shall be authenticated by the court reporter under the\nsame conditions which would impose such a duty on a member under this\nsubdivision. If the proceedings have resulted in an acquittal of all\ncharges and specifications or, if not affecting a general or flag\nofficer, in a sentence not including discharge and not in excess of that\nwhich may otherwise be adjudged by a special court-martial, the record\nshall contain such matters as may be prescribed by regulations issued\npursuant to this chapter.\n  (b) Each special and summary court-martial shall keep a separate\nrecord of the proceedings in each case, which record shall contain such\nmatter and be authenticated in such manner as may be required by\nregulations issued pursuant to this chapter.\n  (c) A copy of the record of the proceedings of each general and\nspecial court-martial shall be given to the accused as soon as\nauthenticated.\n
N.Y. CCA Law § 801 — New York Code / Act CCA / Article 8 / Section 801
Provisional remedies; procedure
Status: in_force

§ 801. Provisional remedies; procedure. Whenever the remedies set\nforth in § 209 of this act may issue out of this court under the terms\nof said section, practice and procedure thereon shall be governed,\ninsofar as consistent with this act, by the CPLR and such other\nprovisions of law governing practice and procedure thereon in the\nsupreme court, subject to the following:\n  (a) The remedy may be executed only within the city of New York,\nagainst persons or property within the city of New York.\n  (b) When a return is required, the return shall be made to the clerk\nof this court in the county out of which the remedy issued.\n  (c) 1. Where a notice of pendency may be filed with the county clerk,\npursuant to § 209(d) of this act, the original complaint shall be filed\nsimultaneously with such county clerk; service of summons shall\nthereafter be made within the time provided in CPLR § 6512. A copy of\nthe complaint shall be sufficient for the purpose of filing the same,\nafter service thereof, with the clerk of this court.\n  2. Where a notice of pendency is filed with the county clerk after the\naction has been commenced in this court, a copy of the complaint may be\nfiled therewith in lieu of the original complaint.\n
N.Y. UJC Law § 1307 — New York Code / Act UJC / Article 13 / Section 1307
Jurors; challenges
Status: in_force

§ 1307. Jurors; challenges.\n  Challenges to jurors shall be as provided in the CPLR.\n
N.Y. ABP Law § 707 — New York Code / Act ABP / Article 7 / Section 707
Reimbursement for claims paid by insurers
Status: in_force

§ 707. Reimbursement for claims paid by insurers. Any life insurance\ncorporation which has paid to the state comptroller moneys deemed\nabandoned property pursuant to the provisions of this article may make\npayment to any person entitled to all or any part thereof and shall\nthereby acquire all of the rights of such person to payment by the state\ncomptroller.\n