FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. DEA Law § 73 — New York Code / Act DEA / Article 5 / Section 73
Legislative standards and limits of dispensing power
Status: in_force

§ 73. Legislative standards and limits of dispensing power. The\ngranting of dispensations pursuant to this article shall be subject to\nthe following standards and limits:\n  (a) No dispensation shall be granted to any employer with respect to\nthe employment of minors under the age of sixteen;\n  (b) No dispensation shall be granted for a period in excess of six\nmonths, provided, however, that upon reconsideration of all of the facts\nand circumstances of a particular case, a continuance of a dispensation\nmay be granted.\n  (c) No dispensation shall be granted which does not safeguard the\nhealth and welfare of the worker and which is not demanded by the\nnecessities of adjusting state policy to requirements of the defense\neffort.\n  (d) No dispensation shall be granted to any employer who can by\nutilization of available labor supply or by organizational or other\nreasonable adjustments maintain maximum efficiency and production\nwithout such dispensation.\n  (e) No dispensation shall be granted except where necessary to prevent\nthe normal restrictions of law from interfering with the paramount duty\nof maximum possible production in defense work.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 170.71 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title K / Article 170 / Section 170.71
Illegal possession of a vehicle identification number; presumptions
Status: in_force

§ 170.71 Illegal possession of a vehicle identification number;\n           presumptions.\n  (1) A person is presumed to knowingly possess a vehicle or vehicle\npart in violation of subdivision two of section 170.70, when he\npossesses any combination of five such whole vehicles or individual\nvehicle parts, none of which are attached to or contained in the same\nvehicle.\n  (2) A person is presumed to knowingly possess a vehicle or vehicle\npart in violation of subdivision three of section 170.70, when he\npossesses any combination of five such whole vehicles or individual\nvehicle parts, none of which are attached to or contained in the same\nvehicle.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 280.10 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title J / Article 280 / Section 280.10
Motion for mistrial
Status: in_force

§ 280.10  Motion for mistrial.\n  At any time during the trial, the court must declare a mistrial and\norder a new trial of the indictment under the following circumstances:\n  1.  Upon motion of the defendant, when there occurs during the trial\nan error or legal defect in the proceedings, or conduct inside or\noutside the courtroom, which is prejudicial to the defendant and\ndeprives him of a fair trial.  When such an error, defect or conduct\noccurs during a joint trial of two or more defendants and a mistrial\nmotion is made by one or more but not by all, the court must declare a\nmistrial only as to the defendant or defendants making or joining in the\nmotion, and the trial of the other defendant or defendants must proceed;\n  2.  Upon motion of the people, when there occurs during the trial,\neither inside or outside the courtroom, gross misconduct by the\ndefendant or some person acting on his behalf, or by a juror, resulting\nin substantial and irreparable prejudice to the people's case.  When\nsuch misconduct occurs during a joint trial of two or more defendants,\nand when the court is satisfied that it did not result in substantial\nprejudice to the people's case as against a particular defendant and\nthat such defendant was in no way responsible for the misconduct, it may\nnot declare a mistrial with respect to such defendant but must proceed\nwith the trial as to him;\n  3.  Upon motion of either party or upon the court's own motion, when\nit is physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity with\nlaw.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 100.05 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title G / Article 100 / Section 100.05
Criminal solicitation in the fourth degree
Status: in_force

§ 100.05 Criminal solicitation in the fourth degree.\n  A person is guilty of criminal solicitation in the fourth degree when:\n  1. with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a\nfelony, he solicits, requests, commands, importunes or otherwise\nattempts to cause such other person to engage in such conduct; or\n  2. being over eighteen years of age, with intent that another person\nunder sixteen years of age engage in conduct that would constitute a\ncrime, he solicits, requests, commands, importunes or otherwise attempts\nto cause such other person to engage in such conduct.\n  Criminal solicitation in the fourth degree is a class A misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. PBO Law § 12 — New York Code / Act PBO / Article 2 / Section 12
Force and effect of official undertaking
Status: in_force

§ 12. Force and effect of official undertaking. An officer of whom an\nofficial undertaking is required, shall not receive any money or\nproperty as such officer, or do any act affecting the disposition of any\nmoney or property which such officer is entitled to receive or have the\ncustody of, before he shall have filed such undertaking; and any person\nhaving the custody or control of any such money or property shall not\ndeliver the same to any officer of whom an undertaking is required until\nsuch undertaking shall have been given. If a public officer required to\ngive an official undertaking, enters upon the discharge of any of his\nofficial duties before giving such undertaking, the sureties upon his\nundertaking subsequently given for or during his official term shall be\nliable for all his acts and defaults done or suffered and for all moneys\nand property received during such term prior to the execution of such\nundertaking, or if a new undertaking is given, from the time notice to\ngive such new undertaking is served upon him. Every official undertaking\nshall be obligatory and in force so long as the officer shall continue\nto act as such and until his successor shall be appointed and duly\nqualified, and until the conditions of the undertaking shall have been\nfully performed. When an official undertaking is renewed pursuant to law\nthe sureties upon the former undertaking shall not be liable for any\nofficial act done or moneys received after the due execution, approval\nand filing of the new undertaking.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 369-EEE — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 24-A / Section 369-EEE
Telecommunication-related and energy-related prohibitions as to prize boxes
Status: in_force

§ 369-eee.  Telecommunication-related and energy-related prohibitions\nas to prize boxes. 1. No box or container used to collect entries for\nsweepstakes or a contest may, at the same time, be used to collect\nletters of authorization or other documents that constitute\nauthorizations by consumers to change their primary long distance\ncarriers or to receive or purchase natural gas, electric service, or any\nother telecommunication services.\n  2. Enforcement by attorney general. Whenever there shall be a\nviolation of this article, application may be made by the attorney\ngeneral in the name of the people of the state of New York to a court or\njustice having jurisdiction by a special proceeding to issue an\ninjunction, and upon notice to the defendant of not less than five days,\nto enjoin and restrain the continuance of such violation; and if it\nshall appear to the satisfaction of the court or justice that the\ndefendant has, in fact, violated this article, an injunction may be\nissued by such court or justice, enjoining and restraining any further\nviolation, without requiring proof that any person has, in fact, been\ninjured or damaged thereby. In any such proceeding, the court may make\nallowances to the attorney general as provided in paragraph six of\nsubdivision (a) of section eighty-three hundred three of the civil\npractice law and rules, and direct restitution. Whenever the court shall\ndetermine that a violation of this article has occurred, the court may\nimpose a civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars for each\nviolation. In connection with any such proposed application, the\nattorney general is authorized to take proof and make a determination of\nthe relevant fact and to issue subpoenas in accordance with the civil\npractice law and rules.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 2-711 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 2 / Part 7 / Section 2-711
Buyer's Remedies in General; Buyer's Security Interest in Rejected Goods
Status: in_force

Section 2--711. Buyer's Remedies in General; Buyer's Security Interest\n                  in Rejected Goods.\n  (1) Where the seller fails to make delivery or repudiates or the buyer\nrightfully rejects or justifiably revokes acceptance then with respect\nto any goods involved, and with respect to the whole if the breach goes\nto the whole contract (Section 2--612), the buyer may cancel and whether\nor not he has done so may in addition to recovering so much of the price\nas has been paid\n       (a) "cover" and have damages under the next section as to all the\n           goods affected whether or not they have been identified to\n           the contract; or\n       (b) recover damages for non-delivery as provided in this Article\n           (Section 2--713).\n  (2) Where the seller fails to deliver or repudiates the buyer may also\n       (a) if the goods have been identified recover them as provided in\n           this Article (Section 2--502); or\n       (b) in a proper case obtain specific performance or replevy the\n           goods as provided in this Article (Section 2--716).\n  (3) On rightful rejection or justifiable revocation of acceptance a\nbuyer has a security interest in goods in his possession or control for\nany payments made on their price and any expenses reasonably incurred in\ntheir inspection, receipt, transportation, care and custody and may hold\nsuch goods and resell them in like manner as an aggrieved seller\n(Section 2--706).\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 59 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 3 / Section 59
Additional width, different type of construction or other additional work under repair or reconstruction contracts
Status: in_force

§ 59. Additional width, different type of construction or other\nadditional work under repair or reconstruction contracts. Whenever in\nthe maintenance, repair or reconstruction of state highways the\ncommissioner of transportation shall have determined upon the necessity\nof resurfacing or reconstructing such highway, the county, town or\nvillage wherein the highway is located may petition the commissioner of\ntransportation to provide an additional width, a different type of\npavement, or both, or any additional work or any or all of same, in the\nplans providing for such resurfacing or reconstruction.\n  The additional expense of such widening, different type of\nconstruction or additional work shall be borne wholly by such county,\ntown or village and the provisions of sections forty-six, forty-eight\nand forty-nine shall apply to such additional width, different type of\nconstruction or any additional work under such repair or reconstruction\ncontract in the same manner as under a construction contract as provided\nin those sections.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 65.20 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 2 / Title E / Article 65 / Section 65.20
Sentence of unconditional discharge
Status: in_force

§ 65.20 Sentence of unconditional discharge.\n  1. Criteria. The court may impose a sentence of unconditional\ndischarge in any case where it is authorized to impose a sentence of\nconditional discharge under section 65.05 if the court is of the opinion\nthat no proper purpose would be served by imposing any condition upon\nthe defendant's release.\n  When a sentence of unconditional discharge is imposed for a felony,\nthe court shall set forth in the record the reasons for its action.\n  2. Sentence. When the court imposes a sentence of unconditional\ndischarge, the defendant shall be released with respect to the\nconviction for which the sentence is imposed without imprisonment, fine\nor probation supervision. A sentence of unconditional discharge is for\nall purposes a final judgment of conviction.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 680-N — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 13-F / Section 680-N
Uniformity of application and construction
Status: in_force

§ 680-n. Uniformity of application and construction. In applying and\nconstruing the provisions of this uniform special deposits act, a court\nshall consider the promotion of uniformity of the law among\njurisdictions that enact it.\n
N.Y. COM Law § 341 — New York Code / Act COM / Article 16 / Section 341
Statement of legislative intent
Status: in_force

§ 341. Statement of legislative intent. It is the intent of the\nlegislature to provide the necessary assurances and commitments required\nby the United States olympic committee and the international olympic\ncommittee in selecting a host city or municipality for the two thousand\ntwelve olympic games. The selection of locations in New York state to\nhost the olympic games will confer significant benefits to the state as\na whole and the host municipality through increased tourism, economic\ngrowth, job creation and capital improvements. In addition, it is\nprojected that the hosting city and state will receive substantially\nincreased sales and other tax revenues as a direct consequence of\nhosting the games. Such additional revenues are expected to\nsignificantly exceed any potential liability of the municipality and the\nstate associated with this act. Contracts entered into by the state and\nfunds appropriated in accordance with this act shall be used for the\nsole purpose of fulfilling the joint obligation of the endorsing\nmunicipality and the state required by the United States olympic\ncommittee or the international olympic committee under a games support\ncontract or any other agreement to indemnify and insure against any net\nfinancial deficit resulting from the conduct of the games. In no event\nshall the combined liability of a host municipality and state exceed two\nhundred fifty million dollars. It is also the intent of the legislature\nto support future summer and winter olympics bids by municipalities and\nthe state.\n
N.Y. PAR Law § 7.11 — New York Code / Act PAR / Title B / Article 7 / Section 7.11
Powers and duties of commissions
Status: in_force

§ 7.11 Powers and duties of commissions. Each regional park,\nrecreation and historic preservation commission shall:\n  1. Act as a central advisory agency on all matters affecting parks,\noutdoor recreation and historic preservation within the park region it\nserves.\n  2. Represent and convey to the commissioner and council citizen\nviewpoints as to the programs and needs of the park region it serves.\n  3. Maintain close liaison with officials of the office having\nadministrative jurisdiction over the park region which it serves, and\nadvise such officials on local policy, operational and budgetary\nmatters.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 882 — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 39 / Section 882
Pre-application conferences
Status: in_force

* § 882. Pre-application conferences. The office, at the request of\nany person proceeding in accordance with section eight hundred\neighty-one of this article, may conduct a pre-application conference,\npending the submission of application forms, in which the interested\nstate agencies shall participate in order to clarify the nature and\nscope of their interest and provide guidance to the person in relation\nto permit application review processes and in order to coordinate agency\nactions and data compilation or submission regarding permit\nrequirements. Other state agencies having responsibilities for business\npromotion and regulation may participate in any such conference at the\ndiscretion of the director.\n  * NB Authority of office terminated per § 893 December 31, 1995\n
N.Y. RPP Law § 276 — New York Code / Act RPP / Article 8 / Section 276
Effect of certain easements on the right to invest in mortgages
Status: in_force

§ 276. Effect of certain easements on the right to invest in\nmortgages. The existence of an easement in real property acquired or\nreserved by a municipal corporation, a railroad corporation or other\ntransportation corporation, shall not be deemed an encumbrance upon such\nreal property under any law relating to investments in mortgages upon\nreal property by corporations, trustees, executors, administrators,\nguardians or other persons holding trust funds, but the effect of such\nan easement upon the real property which it affects, shall be taken into\nconsideration in determining the value thereof.\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 223-B — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 5 / Section 223-B
EMS training and mutual aid programs
Status: in_force

§ 223-b. EMS training and mutual aid programs. 1. In order to develop\nand maintain programs for EMS training, EMS-related activities and\nmutual aid emergencies in which the services of EMS providers would be\nused and to cooperate with appropriate state agencies in furthering such\nprograms, any county may create a county EMS advisory board and may\nestablish the office of county EMS coordinator.\n  2. A county EMS advisory board shall consist of not less than five nor\nmore than twenty-one members, each of whom shall be appointed by the\nlegislative body for a term of not to exceed one year, two years or\nthree years.  Such terms of office need not be the same for all members.\nIt shall be the duty of such board to cooperate with appropriate state\nagencies in relation to such programs for EMS training, EMS-related\nactivities and mutual aid; to act as an advisory body to the county\ngovernment and to the county EMS coordinator, if any, in connection with\nthe county participation in such programs for EMS training, EMS-related\nactivities and mutual aid and mutual aid programs in cases of\nemergencies in which the services of EMS providers would be used; to\nperform such other duties as may be prescribed in relation to EMS\ntraining, EMS-related activities and mutual aid in cases of emergencies\nin which the services of EMS providers would be used. The members of\nsuch board shall be county officers, and shall serve without\ncompensation.\n  3. If the office of county EMS coordinator is created in any county, a\ncounty EMS coordinator shall be appointed. It shall be his or her duty\nto administer the county programs for EMS training and mutual aid in\ncases of emergencies in which the services of EMS providers would be\nused; to act as a liaison officer between the county government and the\ncounty EMS advisory board and the EMS providers in the county and the\nofficers and governing boards or bodies thereof; and to perform such\nother duties as prescribed. The county EMS coordinator shall be a county\nofficer and the amount of his or her compensation, if any, shall be\nfixed by the county.\n  4. A member of the legislative body, the county EMS coordinator, or a\ndeputy county EMS coordinator, may be appointed as a member of the\ncounty EMS advisory board, but shall receive no additional compensation\nfor services performed as a member of such advisory board.\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 375 — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 7 / Section 375
Allotments of appropriations
Status: in_force

§ 375. Allotments of appropriations. 1. Where the board of supervisors\nof a county, by action taken pursuant to section three hundred\nseventy-six, provides that this section shall apply to such county, the\nhead of each administrative unit shall submit to the budget officer, at\nthe time specified by him, a work program for the ensuing fiscal year,\nwhich program shall include all appropriations for operation and\nmaintenance and purchase of equipment and shall show the requested\nallotments of such appropriations for such administrative unit by\nquarterly periods for the entire fiscal year. The budget officer shall\nreview the requested allotments in the light of the work program of the\nadministrative unit and may revise, alter, or change the requested\nallotments before approving the same. The aggregate of the allotments\nfor any administrative unit shall not exceed the amount appropriated for\nsuch administrative unit for the fiscal year. A copy of the allotments\nas finally approved by the budget officer shall be filed with the chief\nfiscal officer and expenditures shall be made only in accordance with\nsuch approved allotments as revised. Approved allotments may be revised\nduring the fiscal year by the budget officer in the same manner as the\noriginal allotment was made.\n  2. If, at any time during the fiscal year the budget officer shall\nascertain that the available revenues, including the proceeds of the tax\non real estate, for such year will be less than the total\nappropriations, he shall reconsider the work programs and allotments of\nthe several administrative units and make a revision thereof, so as to\nprevent the making of expenditures in excess of the amounts available\ntherefor.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 216-D — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 11 / Section 216-D
Consumer product protection
Status: in_force

§ 216-d. Consumer product protection. 1. The superintendent, in\nconsultation with the commissioner of the division of criminal justice\nservices, shall establish a program to investigate actual and/or\nsuspected cases of consumer product tampering, as defined in sections\n145.35, 145.40 and 145.45 of the penal law, within this state and may\nassign such employees, as deemed necessary for the proper operation of\nsuch program.\n  2. Such program shall provide that the state police may, upon request,\nact as the coordinating agency responding to cases of suspected product\ntampering. The superintendent in conjunction with the commissioner of\nthe division of criminal justice services, shall, by regulation,\nestablish uniform procedures that may be used by other agencies involved\nin such cases.\n  3. The superintendent, in conjunction with the commissioner of the\ndivision of criminal justice services, and with the cooperation of the\ndepartment of health, the department of agriculture and markets, and\nother pertinent agencies, shall promulgate such additional rules and\nregulations which in his/her discretion are necessary for the efficient\noperation of this section. These regulations should include but not be\nlimited to the following:\n  a. the establishment of uniform procedures to be used whenever a law\nenforcement or regulatory agency or other agency becomes involved in a\nconsumer product tampering incident. Such regulations shall require that\nthe state police provide direct investigative assistance or support\nservices to any law enforcement or regulatory agency upon request;\n  b. the establishment of a computerized central data base, located at\ndivision headquarters, which will function as an information management\nand retrieval system for matters involving consumer product tampering.\nNotification of all consumer product tampering cases made to law\nenforcement, regulatory agencies or other agencies shall be reported to\nthe central data base within five hours of such notification;\n  c. authorization, upon request, to use the scientific crime detection\nlaboratory to analyze evidence in connection with state police cases or\ncases that originate with other law enforcement, regulatory agencies or\nother agencies; and\n  d. establishment of a twenty-four hour consumer product tampering\nphone line, to be set up at Headquarters' communication section in\nAlbany.\n  4. The superintendent, in cooperation with the division of criminal\njustice services, shall make recommendations to the municipal police\ntraining council for the establishment of a formalized consumer product\ntampering training program for all law enforcement personnel.\n