FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. AGM Law § 368 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 26 / Section 368
Operating upon tails of horses unlawful
Status: in_force

§ 368. Operating upon tails of horses unlawful. 1. Any person who cuts\nthe bone, tissues, muscles or tendons of the tail of any horse, mare or\ngelding, or otherwise operates upon it in any manner for the purpose or\nwith the effect of docking, setting, or otherwise altering the natural\ncarriage of the tail, or who knowingly permits the same to be done upon\npremises of which he is the owner, lessee, proprietor or user, or who\nassists in or is voluntarily present at such cutting, is guilty of a\nmisdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year, or\nby a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by both. If a horse\nis found with the bone, tissues, muscles or tendons of its tail cut as\naforesaid and with the wound resulting therefrom unhealed, upon the\npremises or in the charge and custody of any person, such fact shall be\nprima facie evidence of a violation of this section by the owner or user\nof such premises or the person having such charge or custody,\nrespectively.\n  2. Any person who shows or exhibits at any horse show or other like\nexhibition in this state a horse, mare or gelding, the tail of which has\nbeen cut or operated upon in the manner referred to in section one\nhereof, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for not\nmore than one year, or by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars,\nor by both; provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply\nwith respect to an animal the tail of which has been so cut or operated\nupon, if the owner thereof furnishes to the manager or other official\nhaving charge of the horse show or exhibition at which such animal is\nshown or exhibited an affidavit by the owner, or a licensed\nveterinarian, in a form approved by the state department of agriculture\nand markets, stating either that the tail of such horse was so cut prior\nto June first, nineteen hundred sixty-four, or that it was so cut in a\nstate wherein such cutting was not then specifically prohibited by the\nlaws thereof. Said affidavit shall, to the best of affiant's knowledge,\ninformation and belief, identify the animal with respect to sex, age,\nmarkings, sire and dam, and state either that the cutting was done prior\nto June first, nineteen hundred sixty-four, or the time and place of\nsuch cutting and the name and address of the person by whom performed.\nThe affidavit shall be subject to inspection at all reasonable times by\nany peace officer, acting pursuant to his special duties, or police\nofficer of this state, or by a designated representative of the\ncommissioner. In lieu of furnishing such affidavit to the manager or\nother official having charge of such horse show or exhibition, the owner\nof such horse may specify on the entry blank for the horse show or\nexhibition the name and address of a central registry office designated\nby the state department of agriculture and markets where such an\naffidavit has already been filed and is available for inspection.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 42 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 3 / Section 42
Maintenance of detours during construction
Status: in_force

§ 42. Maintenance of detours during construction. The maintenance and\nrepair of any highway or right of way designated by official order of\nthe department of transportation for use as a detour, during the\nconstruction, reconstruction, or improvement of a state highway, shall\nbe under the supervision of the department of transportation and shall\nbe paid out of the construction fund. Such highway or right of way\ndesignated as a detour by the department of transportation shall be\ndeemed as an improved highway during construction, reconstruction or\nrepair, when the detour is necessary, and shall be maintained, repaired\nand under the supervision of the department of transportation for the\nperiod of necessity only.\n
N.Y. CVR Law § 102 — New York Code / Act CVR / Article 10 / Section 102
Identification required
Status: in_force

§ 102. Identification required. 1. Any uniformed law enforcement\nofficer while interacting with the public in the performance of their\nduties shall visibly display:\n  (a) the name of the agency or department employing such officer; and\n  (b) at least one form of identification of the officer, such as the\nofficer's name, badge number, or shield number.\n  2. Law enforcement officers who are not uniformed while interacting\nwith the public in the performance of their duties shall wear at least\none visibly identifying agency-issued or department-issued logo, patch,\nemblem, insignia, or other external identifier clearly identifying such\nofficer as a law enforcement officer within such agency or department\nacting under color of law.\n  3. The requirements of this section shall not apply to:\n  (a) officers engaged in active undercover operations, covert\nsurveillance, other investigative activities where identification would\ncompromise such investigation, or protective detail assignments for a\ndesignated person or location where visible identification would\nmaterially increase a security risk to the officer or the protected\nindividual; or\n  (b) officers using personal protective equipment required for medical\nor emergency response purposes, where such equipment temporarily\nprevents visible display of identification.\n  4. For the purposes of this section: (a) "visibly display" means to\nwear externally on the uniform in a size and location that is reasonably\nvisible to members of the public with whom the officer interacts; and\n(b) compliance with 10 U.S.C. § 723, in circumstances where that statute\napplies, satisfies all obligations that this section imposes upon the\nofficer.\n  5. Any person who willfully violates this section shall for a first\noffense be guilty of a violation and each subsequent offense shall be\nguilty of a misdemeanor.\n  6. The provisions of this section shall apply notwithstanding any\nother provisions of state or local law, charter, code, ordinance,\nresolution, rule, or regulation to the contrary. Provided, however, that\nnothing in this article shall be construed to prevent or restrict the\nstate government from adopting, enacting, or enforcing state policies or\na local government from adopting, enacting, or enforcing local policies,\nlaws, resolutions, ordinances, or regulations which comply with at least\nthe applicable standards or requirements of this section, or which\nexceed the provisions of this section beyond the requirements set forth\nin the chapter of the laws of two thousand twenty-six that added this\nsection.\n
N.Y. GCN Law § 42 — New York Code / Act GCN / Article 2 / Section 42
Register of county
Status: in_force

§ 42. Register of county. Any act done in pursuance of law by the\nregister of a county shall be deemed to be a compliance with any\nprovision of law authorizing or requiring such act to be done by the\ncounty clerk of such county, and any instrument or writing filed,\nentered or recorded in pursuance of law in the office of a register of a\ncounty, shall be deemed to be a compliance with any provision of law\nauthorizing or requiring such paper to be filed, entered or recorded, as\nthe case may be, in the office of the clerk of such county. The term\ncounty clerk when used in relation to conveyances of real property or\nthe filing or recording of instruments which are or may be filed in the\noffice of the register of a county, shall include the register of each\ncounty in which there is a register.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 4515 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 45 / Section 4515
Form of expert opinion
Status: in_force

Rule 4515. Form of expert opinion. Unless the court orders otherwise,\nquestions calling for the opinion of an expert witness need not be\nhypothetical in form, and the witness may state his opinion and reasons\nwithout first specifying the data upon which it is based. Upon\ncross-examination, he may be required to specify the data and other\ncriteria supporting the opinion.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 2407 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 24 / Section 2407
Procedure after report; determined violation
Status: in_force

§ 2407. Procedure after report; determined violation. (a) If the\nreport charges a determined violation and if the method of competition,\nact or practice constituting such determined violation has not been\ndiscontinued, the superintendent may, through the attorney general, at\nany time after the service of the report cause an action to be\ninstituted to enjoin the person from engaging in such determined\nviolation.\n  (b) The court may on motion and affidavits grant a preliminary\ninjunction and interlocutory injunction upon such terms as may be just.\n  (c) A certified transcript of the proceedings before the\nsuperintendent including all evidence taken and the report and findings\nshall be received in evidence in the action.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 120.16 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title H / Article 120 / Section 120.16
Hazing in the first degree
Status: in_force

§ 120.16 Hazing in the first degree.\n  A person is guilty of hazing in the first degree when, in the course\nof another person's initiation into or affiliation with any\norganization, he intentionally or recklessly engages in conduct,\nincluding, but not limited to, making physical contact with or requiring\nphysical activity of such other person, which creates a substantial risk\nof physical injury to such other person or a third person and thereby\ncauses such injury.\n  Hazing in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 7-101 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 7 / Part 1 / Section 7-101
Short title
Status: in_force

Section 7--101. Short title.\n  This article may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code-Documents of\nTitle.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 1565 — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 33-B / Section 1565
Credit
Status: in_force

§ 1565. Credit. A buyer shall be allowed a credit against the tax due\non a conveyance of real property to the extent tax was paid by such\nbuyer on a prior creation of a leasehold of all or a portion of the same\nreal property or on the granting of an option or contract to purchase\nall or a portion of the same real property by such buyer. Such credit\nshall be computed by multiplying the tax paid on the creation of the\nleasehold or on the granting of the option or contract by a fraction,\nthe numerator of which is the value of the consideration used to compute\nsuch tax paid which is not yet due to such seller on the date of the\nsubsequent conveyance (and which such seller will not be entitled to\nreceive after such date), and the denominator of which is the total\nvalue of the consideration used to compute such tax paid.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 145.23 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title I / Article 145 / Section 145.23
Cemetery desecration in the first degree
Status: in_force

§ 145.23 Cemetery desecration in the first degree.\n  A person is guilty of cemetery desecration in the first degree when\nwith intent to damage property of another person, and having no right to\ndo so nor any reasonable ground to believe that he has such right, he:\n  (a) damages any real or personal property maintained as a cemetery\nplot, grave, burial place or other place of interment of human remains\nin an amount exceeding two hundred fifty dollars; or\n  (b) with intent to steal personal property, he steals personal\nproperty, the value of which exceeds two hundred fifty dollars, which is\nlocated at a cemetery plot, grave, burial place or other place of\ninterment of human remains and which property is owned by the person or\norganization which maintains or owns such place or the estate,\nnext-of-kin or representatives of the deceased person interred there; or\n  (c) commits the crime of cemetery desecration in the second degree as\ndefined in section 145.22 of this article and has been previously\nconvicted of the crime of cemetery desecration in the second degree\nwithin the preceding five years.\n  Cemetery desecration in the first degree is a class E felony.\n
N.Y. EHC Law § 1 — New York Code / Act EHC / Section 1
Legislative findings
Status: in_force

EXPANDED HEALTH CARE COVERAGE ACT\n                    OF NINETEEN HUNDRED EIGHTY-EIGHT\nSection 1. Legislative findings.\n        2. Short title.\n        3. Definitions.\n        4. Regional pilot projects for the uninsured.\n  Section 1. Legislative findings. The legislature finds that there are\nmore than two and one-half million residents of the state who have no\nhealth care coverage. The legislature recognizes that since nineteen\nhundred eighty the number of state residents without health care\ncoverage has increased at a rate of one hundred thousand per year, an\nincrease of more than thirty percent in six years.\n  The legislature further finds that people without health care coverage\nhave limited access to primary health care services and tend to defer\nobtaining medical care, which leads to increased severity of illness and\nincreased costs when services are utilized. The legislature recognizes\nthat the lack of health care coverage has serious implications for the\noverall health status of residents of the state.\n  The legislature recognizes the need to develop methods of providing\nhealth care coverage to uninsured individuals and families in order to\nimprove the health of residents of New York. Therefore, the legislature\nhereby declares that it is the policy of this state to promote the\nestablishment of pilot programs to test effective mechanisms to provide\nhealth care coverage to the uninsured. The legislature further declares\nthat these pilot programs will provide valuable information for\ndetermining future methods of providing comprehensive health care\ncoverage to all New York residents who lack such coverage.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 3201 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 32 / Section 3201
Confession of judgment before default on certain installment contracts invalid
Status: in_force

§ 3201. Confession of judgment before default on certain installment\ncontracts invalid.  Notwithstanding the provisions of section thirty-two\nhundred eighteen, no judgment by confession shall be entered on any\naffidavit which was executed prior to the time a default in the payment\nof an installment occurs in connection with the purchase for fifteen\nhundred dollars or less of any commodities for any use other than a\ncommercial or business use upon any plan of deferred payments whereby\nthe price or cost is payable in two or more installments. Any judgment\nentered in violation of this section is void and unenforceable.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 899-F — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 39-E / Section 899-F
Suspension, revocation or refusal to renew registration
Status: in_force

§ 899-f. Suspension, revocation or refusal to renew registration. 1.\nThe secretary of state may suspend, revoke or refuse to renew a\nregistration for conduct that would have justified denial of\nregistration under subdivision two of section eight hundred\nninety-nine-e of this article.\n  2. The secretary of state may deny, suspend, revoke or refuse to renew\na certificate of registration or licensure only after proper notice and\nan opportunity for a hearing as provided pursuant to provisions of the\nstate administrative procedure act.\n
N.Y. RPP Law § 392 — New York Code / Act RPP / Article 12 / Section 392
Fraud; action to set aside or appeal from the final order or judgment of registration or to recover the property
Status: in_force

§ 392. Fraud; action to set aside or appeal from the final order or\njudgment of registration or to recover the property. Any title\nregistration procured by or as the result of fraud may be set aside, in\nthe same manner and by the same proceedings as in the case of a deed\nobtained by fraud, provided that such proceedings for setting aside the\nregistration shall not injuriously affect the rights of an innocent\npurchaser or incumbrancer of the property after such registration, for\nvalue and without actual notice of the fraud, and provided further that\nthe action or other proceeding to set aside such registration be\ncommenced within ten years from the time when the final order or\njudgment of registration was filed in the office of the county clerk of\nthe county in which the property is located. No action or proceeding or\nappeal shall lie or be commenced, except on the ground of fraud as above\nstated, to set aside or appeal from any final order or judgment of\nregistration or to modify or affect the same or for the recovery of\nregistered property or any estate, right or interest in or lien upon the\nsame or any part thereof, or to make any entry thereon, adversely to the\ntitle or interest registered therein, as directed by a final order or\njudgment of registration of the court, unless such action or proceeding\nor appeal is commenced or taken within thirty days after a certified\ncopy of such final order or judgment of registration is filed in the\noffice of the registrar of the county in which the property is located.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 453 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 21 / Section 453
Reincorporation of existing corporations
Status: in_force

§ 453. Reincorporation of existing corporations. Any Coptic Orthodox\nChurch heretofore incorporated in this state, with the consent of the\nbishop of the Coptic Orthodox Diocese in which its place of worship is\nlocated, may reincorporate under the provisions of this article by\nfiling in the office of the county clerk in the county in which its\nprincipal place of worship is located, a certificate, signed by the\ntrustees in office at the time of such reincorporation whereby the\nmajority of them setting forth that they desire to reincorporate under\nthe provisions of this article, the corporate name by which such a\nchurch shall be known, the county, town, city or village where its\nprincipal place of worship is located and the names of the bishop and\ntwo or more persons appointed by the bishop from among the priests and\ndeacons of such church, who shall constitute the initial board of\ntrustees of said church. Immediately upon the filing of such certificate\nall the right, title, equity and interest of such a church in any\nestate, real or personal, together with all franchise and charter\nrights, shall be vested in the body corporate so created under this\narticle and the original incorporation of such a church be null and\nvoid.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 320 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 17 / Section 320
Application of article
Status: in_force

§ 320. Application of article. This article applies only to Methodist\nchurches and to affiliated and subsidiary organizations.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 3216 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 32 / Section 3216
Want of prosecution
Status: in_force

Rule 3216. Want of prosecution. (a) Where a party unreasonably\nneglects to proceed generally in an action or otherwise delays in the\nprosecution thereof against any party who may be liable to a separate\njudgment, or unreasonably fails to serve and file a note of issue, the\ncourt, on its own initiative or upon motion, with notice to the parties,\nmay dismiss the party's pleading on terms. Unless the order specifies\notherwise, the dismissal is not on the merits.\n  (b) No dismissal shall be directed under any portion of subdivision\n(a) of this rule and no court initiative shall be taken or motion made\nthereunder unless the following conditions precedent have been complied\nwith:\n  (1) Issue must have been joined in the action;\n  (2) One year must have elapsed since the joinder of issue or six\nmonths must have elapsed since the issuance of the preliminary court\nconference order where such an order has been issued, whichever is\nlater;\n  (3) The court or party seeking such relief, as the case may be, shall\nhave served a written demand by registered or certified mail requiring\nthe party against whom such relief is sought to resume prosecution of\nthe action and to serve and file a note of issue within ninety days\nafter receipt of such demand, and further stating that the default by\nthe party upon whom such notice is served in complying with such demand\nwithin said ninety day period will serve as a basis for a motion by the\nparty serving said demand for dismissal as against him or her for\nunreasonably neglecting to proceed. Where the written demand is served\nby the court, the demand shall set forth the specific conduct\nconstituting the neglect, which conduct shall demonstrate a general\npattern of delay in proceeding with the litigation.\n  (c) In the event that the party upon whom is served the demand\nspecified in subdivision (b) (3) of this rule serves and files a note of\nissue within such ninety day period, the same shall be deemed sufficient\ncompliance with such demand and diligent prosecution of the action; and\nin such event, no such court initiative shall be taken and no such\nmotion shall be made, and if taken or made, the court initiative or\nmotion to dismiss shall be denied. (d) After an action has been placed\non the calendar by the service and filing of a note of issue, with or\nwithout any such demand, provided, however, if such demand has been\nserved, within the said ninety day period, the action may not be\ndismissed by reason of any neglect, failure or delay in prosecution of\nthe action prior to the said service and filing of such note of issue.\n  (e) In the event that the party upon whom is served the demand\nspecified in subdivision (b) (3) of this rule fails to serve and file a\nnote of issue within such ninety day period, the court may take such\ninitiative or grant such motion unless the said party shows justifiable\nexcuse for the delay and a good and meritorious cause of action.\n  (f) The provisions of this rule shall not apply to proceedings within\nrule thirty-four hundred four.\n
N.Y. RSS Law § 1301 — New York Code / Act RSS / Article 23 / Section 1301
Election of benefit enhancements
Status: in_force

§ 1301. Election of benefit enhancements. a. The state of New York may\nelect to provide its employees the benefit enhancements provided for in\nsection thirteen hundred two of this article.\n  b. A separate election to provide benefit enhancements pursuant to\nsubdivision a of this section must be made for each specific collective\nbargaining organization, recognized or certified pursuant to article\nfourteen of the civil service law.\n  c. Such election is made by the governor to the retirement system upon\nreceipt of a request from the collective bargaining organization,\nrecognized or certified pursuant to article fourteen of the civil\nservice law to represent such eligible employees. No such petition shall\nbe required for employees who are not represented for the purposes of\ncollective bargaining subject to the limitation provided in section nine\nhundred two of this chapter.\n