FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. EPT Law § 11-A-3.2 — New York Code / Act EPT / Article 11-A / Part 3 / Section 11-A-3.2
Apportionment of receipts and disbursements when decedent
Status: in_force

§ 11-A-3.2 Apportionment of receipts and disbursements when decedent\n               dies or income interest begins\n  (a) A trustee shall allocate an income receipt or disbursement other\nthan one to which paragraph 11-A-2.1 (1) applies to principal if its due\ndate occurs before a decedent dies in the case of an estate or before an\nincome interest begins in the case of a trust or successive income\ninterest.\n  (b) A trustee shall allocate an income receipt or disbursement to\nincome if its due date occurs on or after the date on which a decedent\ndies or an income interest begins and it is a periodic due date. An\nincome receipt or disbursement must be treated as accruing from day to\nday if its due date is not periodic or it has no due date. The portion\nof the receipt or disbursement accruing before the date on which a\ndecedent dies or an income interest begins must be allocated to\nprincipal and the balance must be allocated to income.\n  (c) An item of income or an obligation is due on the date the payer is\nrequired to make a payment. If a payment date is not stated, there is no\ndue date for the purposes of this article. Distributions to shareholders\nor other owners from an entity to which 11-A-4.1 applies are deemed to\nbe due on the date fixed by the entity for determining who is entitled\nto receive the distribution or, if no date is fixed, on the declaration\ndate for the distribution. A due date is periodic for receipts or\ndisbursements that must be paid at regular intervals under a lease or an\nobligation to pay interest or if an entity customarily makes\ndistributions at regular intervals.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 265.46 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title P / Article 265 / Section 265.46
Failure to safely store rifles, shotguns, and firearms in the second degree
Status: in_force

§ 265.46 Failure to safely store rifles, shotguns, and firearms in the\n           second degree.\n  No person who owns or is custodian of a rifle, shotgun or firearm and\nknows, or has reason to know, that a person less than sixteen years of\nage is likely to gain access to such rifle, shotgun or firearm shall\nstore or otherwise leave such rifle, shotgun or firearm out of his or\nher immediate possession or control without having first securely locked\nsuch rifle, shotgun or firearm in an appropriate safe storage depository\nor rendered it incapable of being fired by use of a gun locking device\nappropriate to that weapon. For purposes of this section "safe storage\ndepository" shall have the same meaning as such term is defined in\nsection 265.45 of this article. Nothing in this section shall be deemed\nto affect, impair or supersede any special or local act relating to the\nsafe storage of rifles, shotguns or firearms which impose additional\nrequirements on the owner or custodian of such weapons.\n  It shall not be a violation of this section to allow a person less\nthan sixteen years of age access to: (i) a firearm, rifle or shotgun for\nlawful use as authorized under paragraph seven or seven-e of subdivision\na of section 265.20 of this article, or (ii) a rifle or shotgun for\nlawful use as authorized by article eleven of the environmental\nconservation law when such person less than sixteen years of age is the\nholder of a hunting license or permit and such rifle or shotgun is used\nin accordance with such law.\n  Failure to safely store rifles, shotguns, and firearms in the second\ndegree is a violation punishable only by a fine of not more than two\nhundred fifty dollars.\n
N.Y. MDW Law § 8 — New York Code / Act MDW / Article 2 / Section 8
General application of chapter to dwellings
Status: in_force

§ 8. General application of chapter to dwellings. All the requirements\nof this chapter shall apply to all kinds and classes of multiple\ndwellings, except where there are specific provisions, requirements or\nexceptions for one or more kinds or classes.  A specific provision for\none kind or class of dwelling shall apply only to that kind or class of\ndwelling to which such reference is made. Whenever a specific provision\nis inconsistent with a general provision of this chapter, the specific\nprovision shall apply and take precedence. The department shall have\npower to classify dwellings in accordance with the provisions of this\nchapter.\n
N.Y. SLG Law § 3 — New York Code / Act SLG / Article 1 / Section 3
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 3. Definitions. As used in this chapter the following terms shall\nmean or include:\n  1. "Chief executive officer." The elective or appointive chief\nexecutive officer, if there be one, or otherwise the chairman of the\nboard of supervisors, in the case of a county, the mayor in the case of\na city or village or the supervisor in the case of a town.\n  2. "Local government." A county, city, town or village.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 179.15 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title K / Article 179 / Section 179.15
Criminal retention of medical cannabis
Status: in_force

* § 179.15 Criminal retention of medical cannabis.\n  A person is guilty of criminal retention of medical cannabis when,\nbeing a certified patient or designated caregiver, as those terms are\ndefined in section three of the cannabis law, he or she knowingly\nobtains, possesses, stores or maintains an amount of cannabis in excess\nof the amount he or she is authorized to possess under the provisions of\narticle three of the cannabis law.\n  Criminal retention of medical cannabis shall be punishable as provided\nin section 222.25 of this chapter.\n  * NB Repealed July 5, 2028\n
N.Y. ACA Law § 55.01 — New York Code / Act ACA / Title T / Article 55 / Section 55.01
Short title
Status: in_force

§ 55.01. Short title. This title may be cited as the "Natural Heritage\nTrust Act."\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 503 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 5 / Section 503
Venue based on residence
Status: in_force

§ 503. Venue based on residence. (a) Generally. Except where otherwise\nprescribed by law, the place of trial shall be in the county in which\none of the parties resided when it was commenced; the county in which a\nsubstantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim\noccurred; or, if none of the parties then resided in the state, in any\ncounty designated by the plaintiff. A party resident in more than one\ncounty shall be deemed a resident of each such county.\n  (b) Executor, administrator, trustee, committee, conservator, general\nor testamentary guardian, or receiver. An executor, administrator,\ntrustee, committee, conservator, general or testamentary guardian, or\nreceiver shall be deemed a resident of the county of his appointment as\nwell as the county in which he actually resides.\n  (c) Corporation. A domestic corporation, or a foreign corporation\nauthorized to transact business in the state, shall be deemed a resident\nof the county in which its principal office is located; except that such\na corporation, if a railroad or other common carrier, shall also be\ndeemed a resident of the county where the cause of action arose.\n  (d) Unincorporated association, partnership, or individually-owned\nbusiness. A president or treasurer of an unincorporated association,\nsuing or being sued on behalf of the association, shall be deemed a\nresident of any county in which the association has its principal\noffice, as well as the county in which he actually resides. A\npartnership or an individually-owned business shall be deemed a resident\nof any county in which it has its principal office, as well as the\ncounty in which the partner or individual owner suing or being sued\nactually resides.\n  (e) Assignee. In an action for a sum of money only, brought by an\nassignee other than an assignee for the benefit of creditors or a holder\nin due course of a negotiable instrument, the assignee's residence shall\nbe deemed the same as that of the original assignor at the time of the\noriginal assignment.\n  (f) Consumer credit transaction. In an action arising out of a\nconsumer credit transaction where a purchaser, borrower or debtor is a\ndefendant, the place of trial shall be the residence of a defendant, if\none resides within the state or the county where such transaction took\nplace, if it is within the state, or, in other cases, as set forth in\nsubdivision (a).\n  (g) Student debt. In an action to recover tuition, fees, room and\nboard, educational benefit payments, student loans, or other such\ncharges incurred by a student in furtherance of such student's education\nowed to the state of New York, the place of trial shall be the residence\nof a defendant, if one resides within the state, or, in other cases, as\nset forth in this article.\n
N.Y. COM Law § 185 — New York Code / Act COM / Article 6 / Section 185
Revitalization programs
Status: in_force

§ 185. Revitalization programs. In addition to the criteria described\nin section one hundred eighty-four of this article and such other\ncriteria as the board may by rule or regulation define, an economic\ndevelopment power allocation may be made to a business in serious,\nlong-term distress that is not primarily caused by normal, short-term\nchanges in the business cycle, when the applicant demonstrates to the\nsatisfaction of the board:\n  (a) that the applicant has formulated and will implement a\ncomprehensive business revitalization plan which is described in its\napplication, and which:\n  (1) contains a detailed strategy for actions to be taken by the\napplicant to continue as a successful business, including, but not\nlimited to, productivity and efficiency improvements, changes in\noperations, financing or management, measures to enhance labor and\nmanagement cooperation and to improve the skills and performance of the\nwork force at all levels, capital investment in new equipment and plant\nmodernization, development of new markets and products, and such other\nactions as will enable the business to stabilize and sustain its\noperations;\n  (2) has been endorsed by the board of directors; and\n  (3) establishes a verifiable schedule for completion of proposed\nactions;\n  (b) that an allocation of economic development power will\nsignificantly contribute to the revitalization plan;\n  (c) that the business is likely to close, partially close or relocate\nout of state resulting in the loss of substantial numbers of jobs;\n  (d) that the business is an important employer in the community and\nefforts to revitalize the business are in the long-term interests of\nboth employees and the community;\n  (e) that a reasonable prospect exists that the proposed revitalization\nplan will enable the business to remain competitive and become\nprofitable and preserve jobs for a substantial period of time;\n  (f) that the applicant demonstrates cooperation with the local\nelectricity distributor and other available sources of assistance to\nreduce energy costs to the maximum extent practicable, through\nconservation and load management; and\n  (g) that the allocation will not unduly affect the cost of electric\nservice to customers of the local electricity distributor.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 244 — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 12 / Section 244
Hostels and foster homes
Status: in_force

§ 244. Hostels and foster homes. 1. The office is hereby authorized to\nprovide or to pay for care in a hostel or foster home approved by the\noffice as suitable for such cases for any probationer or parolee under\nthe age of twenty-one years when the parole board or a judge of a court\ndetermines that there is no other suitable home for such probationer or\nparolee and that such probationer or parolee should be placed in such\nhostel or foster home. In addition to payment for such care, when\nordered by the board or court, the office is authorized to provide or\npay for clothing and other necessities, including medical and\npsychiatric treatment, required for the welfare of such probationer or\nparolee. The office may also provide or contract for such care in any\nsuitable facility operated by a department of correction or by any other\npublic or voluntary social welfare agency, institution or organization.\nA court with respect to such a probationer and the parole board with\nrespect to such a parolee shall, subject to regulation by the division\ncontrol admissions to and discharges from such hostels and foster homes.\nWhen placement is made in any hostel or foster home, or in any facility\nother than a public institution, such placement whenever practicable\nshall be in a hostel, or facility operated by or in the home of a person\nor persons of the same religious faith as the probationer or parolee.\n  2. The office shall have authority and the duty to stimulate programs\nfor the development of hostels and foster homes for the care of\nprobationers and parolees under the age of twenty-one years.\n
N.Y. PBS Law § 15 — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 1 / Section 15
Certain acts prohibited
Status: in_force

§ 15. Certain acts prohibited. Every commissioner, and every person\nemployed or appointed to office in the department is hereby forbidden\nand prohibited to solicit, suggest, request or recommend, directly or\nindirectly, to any corporation or person subject to the supervision of\nthe commission, or to any officer, attorney, agent or employee thereof,\nthe appointment of any person to any office, place, position or\nemployment.  And every such corporation and person, and every officer,\nattorney, agent and employee thereof, is hereby forbidden and prohibited\nto offer to any commissioner or to any person employed by the department\nany office, place, appointment or position, or to offer or give to any\ncommissioner, or to any officer employed or appointed to office in the\ndepartment any free pass or transportation or any reduction in fare to\nwhich the public generally are not entitled or free carriage for\nproperty or any present, gift or gratuity of any kind. If any\ncommissioner or any person employed or appointed to office in the\ndepartment shall violate any provision of this section he shall be\nremoved from office. Every commissioner and every person employed or\nappointed to office in the department shall be and be deemed to be a\npublic officer. Any employee or agent of the department who divulges any\nconfidential information which may come to his knowledge during the\ncourse of any inspection or examination of the property, accounts,\nrecords or memoranda of any person, corporation or municipality subject\nto the jurisdiction of the commission, except insofar as he may be\ndirected by the commission, or by a court or judge, or authorized by\nlaw, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 915 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 40 / Section 915
Global positioning systems
Status: in_force

§ 915. Global positioning systems. A peer-to-peer car sharing program\nadministrator shall not use information from any global positioning\nsystem technology to determine or impose any costs, fees, charges, or\npenalties on a shared vehicle driver for such driver's use of a shared\nvehicle. The use of global positioning technology shall not limit the\nright of such peer-to-peer car sharing program administrator to impose\ncosts, fees, charges, or penalties to recover a vehicle that is lost,\nmisplaced, or stolen. The provisions of this subdivision shall not be\nconstrued to modify or supersede any other provision of law.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 1810-A — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 18-A / Section 1810-A
Limitation on right to resort to commercial claims procedures
Status: in_force

§ 1810-A. Limitation on right to resort to commercial claims procedures.\n  If the clerk shall find that the procedures of the commercial claims\npart are sought to be utilized by a claimant for purposes of oppression\nor harassment, as where a claimant has previously resorted to such\nprocedures on the same claim and has been unsuccessful after the hearing\nthereon, the clerk may in his discretion compel the claimant to make\napplication to the court for leave to prosecute the claim in the\ncommercial claims part.  The court upon such application may inquire\ninto the circumstances and, if it shall find that the claim has already\nbeen adjudicated, or that the claim is sought to be brought on solely\nfor purposes of oppression or harassment and not under color of right,\nit may make an order denying the claimant the use of the commercial\nclaims part to prosecute the claim.\n
N.Y. COR Law § 89-G — New York Code / Act COR / Article 4-B / Section 89-G
Costs for establishing, operating and maintaining alternate correctional facilities
Status: in_force

§ 89-g. Costs for establishing, operating and maintaining alternate\ncorrectional facilities. 1. When the city of New York has entered into\nthe agreements as set forth in section eighty-eight of this article, it\nshall be obligated, to pay, in accordance with such agreements and at\nsuch times and in such amounts as may be determined by the commissioner\nand approved by the director of the budget, all direct and indirect\ncosts associated with the acquisition, construction, establishment,\ncapital repairs and improvements, operation and maintenance of the\nalternate correctional facility.\n  2. Upon completion of the acquisition, construction and establishment\nof an alternate correctional facility, the commissioner shall make a\nfinal determination of the cost of such project and shall certify such\ncost to the comptroller and to the city of New York. Notwithstanding any\nother provision of law to the contrary, upon receipt of such\ncertification of the commissioner, the comptroller shall forthwith\nrefund any amounts received from the city of New York in excess of the\ncosts so certified to the city of New York, including interest accrued\nthereon.\n  3. On or before October fifteenth of each year, the comptroller shall\ncertify to the commissioner the actual operation and maintenance costs\nof each alternate correctional facility for the preceding state fiscal\nyear and the amounts paid by the city of New York for such operation and\nmaintenance costs. To the extent that the amounts so paid by the city of\nNew York are less than the operation and maintenance costs for such\nstate fiscal year, the commissioner shall include the amount of such\nunderpayment in the next payment required to be received from the city\nof New York, or if operation by the state has terminated, the\ncommissioner shall bill the city of New York for the amounts due and\nsuch amounts shall be paid by the city within thirty days of receipt of\nsuch a bill. To the extent that the amounts so paid by the city of New\nYork are more than the operation and maintenance costs for such state\nfiscal year, the commissioner shall reduce the next scheduled payment to\nbe received from the city of New York by the amount of the overpayment\nor if operation by the state has terminated, the commissioner shall\nrefund the overpayment within sixty days of the determination of\noverpayment.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 177 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 8-B / Section 177
Certificate of incorporation
Status: in_force

§ 177. Certificate of incorporation. 1. The presiding officer of such\nmeeting and at least two other persons present and voting thereat shall\nexecute and acknowledge a certificate of incorporation which shall set\nforth the following:\n  (a) The name of the proposed corporation.\n  (b) The number of trustees thereof.\n  (c) The names of the trustees elected for the first year.\n  (d) The county and town, city or village in which the principal place\nof worship is or is intended to be located.\n  (e) The date of its annual meeting for the election of trustees.\n  2. On filing such certificate in the office of the county clerk of the\ncounty in which such church is or is intended to be located, such church\nshall be a corporation by the name stated in the certificate of\nincorporation.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 120.70 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title H / Article 120 / Section 120.70
Warrant of arrest; where executable
Status: in_force

§ 120.70 Warrant of arrest; where executable.\n  1. A warrant of arrest issued by a district court, by the New York\nCity criminal court, the youth part of a superior court or by a superior\ncourt judge sitting as a local criminal court may be executed anywhere\nin the state.\n  2. A warrant of arrest issued by a city court, a town court or a\nvillage court may be executed:\n  (a) In the county of issuance or in any adjoining county; or\n  (b) Anywhere else in the state upon the written endorsement thereon of\na local criminal court of the county in which the arrest is to be made.\nWhen so endorsed, the warrant is deemed the process of the endorsing\ncourt as well as that of the issuing court.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 4-402 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 4 / Part 4 / Section 4-402
Bank's Liability to Customer for Wrongful Dishonor
Status: in_force

Section 4--402. Bank's Liability to Customer for Wrongful Dishonor.\n  A payor bank is liable to its customer for damages proximately caused\nby the wrongful dishonor of an item. When the dishonor occurs through\nmistake liability is limited to actual damages proved. If so proximately\ncaused and proved damages may include damages for an arrest or\nprosecution of the customer or other consequential damages. Whether any\nconsequential damages are proximately caused by the wrongful dishonor is\na question of fact to be determined in each case.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 170-B — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 7 / Section 170-B
Employee loans
Status: in_force

* § 170-b. Employee loans. 1. No state agency shall make available to\nemployees a loan of any amount of money. Provided, however, that nothing\nin this section shall be construed to impede any person from receiving\nany aid for which he or she is eligible pursuant to any state or federal\nstatute or regulation.\n  2. For purposes of this section, the term "state agency" shall mean\nany state department, state university of New York, city university of\nNew York, authority, board, bureau, division, commission, committee,\ncouncil, office or other governmental entity performing a governmental\nor proprietary function for the state.\n  * NB There are 2 § 170-b's\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 81 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 4 / Section 81
Associate justice of appellate division to preside in absence of presiding justice
Status: in_force

§ 81. Associate justice of appellate division to preside in absence of\npresiding justice. If the presiding justice is not present at the\nsitting of the appellate division, the associate justice presiding in\nthe department having served the longest time as such, or, if two are\npresent who have served the same length of time, the elder of them must\nact as presiding justice until a presiding justice attends.\n