FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. ELN Law § 6-124 — New York Code / Act ELN / Article 6 / Section 6-124
Conventions; judicial
Status: in_force

§ 6-124. Conventions; judicial. A judicial district convention shall\nbe constituted by the election at the preceding primary of delegates and\nalternate delegates, if any, from each assembly district or, if an\nassembly district shall contain all or part of two or more counties and\nif the rules of the party shall so provide, separately from the part of\nsuch assembly district contained within each such county. The number of\ndelegates and alternates, if any, shall be determined by party rules,\nbut the number of delegates shall be substantially in accordance with\nthe ratio, which the number of votes cast for the party candidate for\nthe office of governor, on the line or column of the party at the last\npreceding election for such office, in any unit of representation, bears\nto the total vote cast at such election for such candidate on such line\nor column in the entire state. The number of alternates from any\ndistrict shall not exceed the number of delegates therefrom.  The\ndelegates certified to have been elected as such, in the manner provided\nin this chapter, shall be conclusively entitled to their seats, rights\nand votes as delegates to such convention. When a duly elected delegate\ndoes not attend the convention, his place shall be taken by one of the\nalternates, if any, to be substituted in his place, in the order of the\nvote received by each such alternate as such vote appears upon the\ncertified list and if an equal number of votes were cast for two or more\nsuch alternates; the order in which such alternates shall be substituted\nshall be determined by lot forthwith upon the convening of the\nconvention. If there shall have been no contested election for\nalternate, substitution shall be in the order in which the name of such\nalternate appears upon the certified list, and if no alternates shall\nhave been elected or if no alternates appear at such convention, then\nthe delegates present from the same district shall elect a person to\nfill the vacancy.\n
N.Y. COR Law § 168-W — New York Code / Act COR / Article 6-C / Section 168-W
Separability
Status: in_force

§ 168-w. Separability. If any section of this article, or part thereof\nshall be adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,\nsuch judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder or\nany other section or part thereof.\n
N.Y. CVR Law § 44 — New York Code / Act CVR / Article 4 / Section 44
Discrimination by industries involved in defense contracts
Status: in_force

§ 44. Discrimination by industries involved in defense contracts.  It\nshall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation engaged to any\nextent whatsoever in the production, manufacture or distribution of\nmilitary or naval material, equipment or supplies for the state of New\nYork or for the federal government to refuse to employ any person in any\ncapacity on account of the race, color, creed or national origin of such\nperson.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 343-E — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 343-E
Portion of state highway system in the county of Rockland to be designated as the "Vietnam Veterans Memorial Highway"
Status: in_force

§ 343-e. Portion of state highway system in the county of Rockland to\nbe designated as the "Vietnam Veterans Memorial Highway". All that\nportion of the state highway system in the county of Rockland\nconstituting state route 9W beginning at the New York/New Jersey state\nline continuing north along the Hudson River through the county of\nRockland to the Orange county line located at Bear Mountain Circle,\nexcept the bridge across Lowland Creek in the town of Stony Point in the\ncounty of Rockland shall be known as the "Vietnam Veterans Memorial\nHighway".\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 1053 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 10 / Part 5 / Section 1053
Suspended judgment
Status: in_force

§ 1053. Suspended judgment.  (a) Rules of court shall define\npermissible terms and conditions of a suspended judgment. These terms\nand conditions shall relate to the acts or omissions of the parent or\nother person legally responsible for the care of the child.\n  (b) The maximum duration of any term or condition of a suspended\njudgment is one year, unless the court finds at the conclusion of that\nperiod, upon a hearing, that exceptional circumstances require an\nextension thereof for an additional year.\n  (c) Except as provided for herein, in any order issued pursuant to\nthis section, the court may require the child protective agency to make\nprogress reports to the court, the parties, and the child's attorney on\nthe implementation of such order. Where the order of disposition is\nissued upon the consent of the parties and the child's attorney, such\nagency shall report to the court, the parties and the child's attorney\nno later than ninety days after the issuance of the order, unless the\ncourt determines that the facts and circumstances of the case do not\nrequire such report to be made.\n
N.Y. YTS Law § 15-130 — New York Code / Act YTS / Article 10 / Section 15-130
Administrative provisions
Status: in_force

§ 15-130. Administrative provisions.\n  The provisions contained in Part VI of Article 22 of the New York\nState Tax Law and § 1331 of the New York State Tax Law, including the\nprovisions of judicial review by a proceeding under Article 78 of the\nCivil Practice Law and Rules, shall be applicable with the same force\nand effect as if those provisions had been incorporated in full in this\nsection and had expressly referred to any tax imposed by this article,\nexcept where inconsistent with the provisions of this article.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 3-119 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 3 / Part 1 / Section 3-119
Other Writings Affecting Instrument
Status: in_force

Section 3--119. Other Writings Affecting Instrument.\n  (1) As between the obligor and his immediate obligee or any transferee\nthe terms of an instrument may be modified or affected by any other\nwritten agreement executed as a part of the same transaction, except\nthat a holder in due course is not affected by any limitation of his\nrights arising out of the separate written agreement if he had no notice\nof the limitation when he took the instrument.\n  (2) A separate agreement does not affect the negotiability of an\ninstrument.\n
N.Y. PBG Law § 618 — New York Code / Act PBG / Article 14-A / Section 618
Division of an assisted family
Status: in_force

* § 618. Division of an assisted family. 1. In those instances where a\nfamily assisted under this article becomes divided into two otherwise\neligible individuals or families due to divorce, legal separation or the\ndivision of the family, where such individuals or families cannot agree\nas to which such individual or family should continue to receive the\nassistance, and where there is no determination by a court, the housing\naccess voucher local administrator shall consider the following factors\nto determine which of the individuals or families will continue to be\nassisted:\n  (a) which of such individuals or families has custody of dependent\nchildren;\n  (b) which such individual was the head of household when the voucher\nwas initially issued as listed on the initial application;\n  (c) the composition of such individuals and families and which such\nfamily includes elderly or disabled members;\n  (d) whether domestic violence was involved in the breakup of such\nfamily;\n  (e) which family members remain in the unit; and\n  (f) recommendations of social services professionals.\n  2. Documentation of these factors will be the responsibility of the\nrequesting parties. If documentation is not provided, the housing access\nvoucher local administrator will terminate assistance on the basis of\nfailure to provide information necessary for a recertification.\n  * NB Expires May 1, 2030\n
N.Y. PVH Law § 574-A — New York Code / Act PVH / Article 11 / Section 574-A
Municipal housing development fund
Status: in_force

§ 574-a. Municipal housing development fund. 1. A municipality may\ncreate and establish a revolving fund to be known as the "municipal\nhousing development fund." Such a revolving fund shall be created and\nestablished in the supervising agency.\n  2. There shall be paid into such municipal housing development fund\n(a) any moneys appropriated and made available by the municipality for\nthe purposes of such fund, (b) notwithstanding the provisions of the\nlocal finance law or any other provision of law, any moneys received in\nrepayment of advances made from such fund, and (c) any other moneys\nwhich may be available for the purpose of such fund from any other\nsource or sources.\n  3. Any moneys held in such municipal housing development fund not\nrequired for immediate disbursement may be invested, at the discretion\nof the supervising agency, in obligations of the state or the United\nStates government or obligations the principal and interest of which are\nguaranteed by the state or the United States government. Any income or\ninterest earned by, or increment to, such municipal housing development\nfund shall be added to the moneys held in such fund for the purposes\nherein provided.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 6515 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 65 / Section 6515
Undertaking for cancellation of notice of pendency; security by plaintiff
Status: in_force

§ 6515. Undertaking for cancellation of notice of pendency; security\nby plaintiff. In any action other than a foreclosure action as defined\nin subdivision (b) of section 6516 of this article or for partition or\ndower, the court, upon motion of any person aggrieved and upon such\nnotice as it may require, may direct any county clerk to cancel a notice\nof pendency, upon such terms as are just, whether or not the judgment\ndemanded would affect specific real property, if the moving party shall\ngive an undertaking in an amount to be fixed by the court, and if:\n  1. the court finds that adequate relief can be secured to the\nplaintiff by the giving of such an undertaking; or\n  2. in such action, the plaintiff fails to give an undertaking, in an\namount to be fixed by the court, that the plaintiff will indemnify the\nmoving party for the damages that he or she may incur if the notice is\nnot cancelled.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 120.25 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title H / Article 120 / Section 120.25
Reckless endangerment in the first degree
Status: in_force

§ 120.25 Reckless endangerment in the first degree.\n  A person is guilty of reckless endangerment in the first degree when,\nunder circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he\nrecklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to\nanother person.\n  Reckless endangerment in the first degree is a class D felony.\n
N.Y. PTR Law § 121-207 — New York Code / Act PTR / Article 8-A / Section 121-207
Liability for false statement in certificate
Status: in_force

§ 121-207. Liability for false statement in certificate. (a) If any\ncertificate of limited partnership, certificate of amendment, or other\ncertificate filed pursuant to this article contains a materially false\nstatement, one who suffers loss by reasonable reliance on the statement\nmay recover damages for the loss from:\n  (1) any person who executes the certificate, or causes another to\nexecute it on his behalf, and knew, and any general partner who knew of\nthe filing of such certificate and who knew or should have known with\nthe exercise of reasonable care and diligence, the statement to be false\nin any material respect at the time the certificate was executed; and\n  (2) any general partner who thereafter knows of the filing of such\ncertificate and who knows or should have known with the exercise of\nreasonable care and diligence that any arrangement or other fact\ndescribed in the certificate has changed, making the statement false in\nany material respect, if that general partner had ninety days to amend\nor cancel the certificate, or to file a petition for its amendment or\ncancellation before the statement was relied upon.\n  (b) No person shall have any liability for failing to cause the\namendment or cancellation of a certificate to be filed or failing to\nfile a petition for its amendment or cancellation, if the certificate or\npetition is filed within ninety days of the time when that person knew\nor should have known that the statement in the certificate was false in\nany material respect.\n
N.Y. RCO Law § 100 — New York Code / Act RCO / Article 5-B / Section 100
Incorporation of Ruthenian Greek Catholic churches
Status: in_force

§ 100. Incorporation of Ruthenian Greek Catholic churches. An\nunincorporated Ruthenian Greek Catholic church of the Greek rite in this\nstate may become incorporated as a church by executing, acknowledging\nand filing a certificate of incorporation, stating the corporate name by\nwhich said church shall be known, and the county, town, city or village\nwhere its principal place of worship is or is intended to be located.\n  A certificate of incorporation of an unincorporated Ruthenian Greek\nCatholic church shall be executed and acknowledged by the Ruthenian\nCatholic bishop, appointed by the pope of Rome to have supervision over\nRuthenian Catholics of the Greek rite in the United States, or in case\nof a vacancy in the office of bishop by reason of death, resignation or\notherwise, the Ruthenian administrator of the Ruthenian Catholic diocese\nduly appointed and recognized by the apostolic delegate in the United\nStates, and the chancellor of the diocese in which its place of worship\nis, and by the pastor of the church and by two laymen, members of such\nchurch, who shall be elected by such officers or by a majority of such\nofficers. On filing such certificate, said church shall be a corporation\nby the name stated in the certificate.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 4-A-502 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 4-A / Part 5 / Section 4-A-502
Creditor Process Served on Receiving Bank; Set Off by Beneficiary's Bank
Status: in_force

Section 4-A-502. Creditor Process Served on Receiving Bank; Set Off by\n                   Beneficiary's Bank.\n  (1) As used in this section, "creditor process" means levy,\nattachment, garnishment, notice of lien, sequestration, or similar\nprocess issued by or on behalf of a creditor or other claimant with\nrespect to an account.\n  (2) This subsection applies to creditor process with respect to an\nauthorized account of the sender of a payment order if the creditor\nprocess is served on the receiving bank. For the purpose of determining\nrights with respect to the creditor process, if the receiving bank\naccepts the payment order the balance in the authorized account is\ndeemed to be reduced by the amount of the payment order to the extent\nthe bank did not otherwise receive payment of the order, unless the\ncreditor process is served at a time and in a manner affording the bank\na reasonable opportunity to act on it before the bank accepts the\npayment order.\n  (3) If a beneficiary's bank has received a payment order for payment\nto the beneficiary's account in the bank, the following rules apply:\n       (a) The bank may credit the beneficiary's account. The amount\n           credited may be set off against an obligation owed by the\n           beneficiary to the bank or may be applied to satisfy creditor\n           process served on the bank with respect to the account.\n       (b) The bank may credit the beneficiary's account and allow\n           withdrawal of the amount credited unless creditor process\n           with respect to the account is served at a time and in a\n           manner affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to act to\n           prevent withdrawal.\n       (c) If creditor process with respect to the beneficiary's account\n           has been served and the bank has had a reasonable opportunity\n           to act on it, the bank may not reject the payment order\n           except for a reason unrelated to the service of process.\n  (4) Creditor process with respect to a payment by the originator to\nthe beneficiary pursuant to a funds transfer may be served only on the\nbeneficiary's bank with respect to the debt owed by that bank to the\nbeneficiary. Any other bank served with the creditor process is not\nobliged to act with respect to the process.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 160-II — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 6-F / Section 160-II
Securing of compensation
Status: in_force

§ 160-ii. Securing of compensation. 1. Within two hundred ten days of\nthe effective date of this article, the fund shall secure the payment of\nworkers' compensation to all black car operators entitled thereto\npursuant to this chapter by either: (a) self-insuring in accordance with\nsubdivision three of section fifty of the workers' compensation law and\nthe rules promulgated by the board pursuant to such section or (b)\npurchasing workers' compensation insurance covering, on a blanket basis,\nall black car operators who are the fund's employees pursuant to section\ntwo of the workers' compensation law.\n  2. If the fund initially seeks to apply to the board for authorization\nto self-insure pursuant to subdivision three of section fifty of the\nworkers' compensation law, it shall submit its application and\naccompanying proof to the board within one hundred fifty days of the\neffective date of this article. The board shall notify the fund and the\nsecretary in writing of any change in the fund's status as a\nself-insurer or of any additional requirements that the board may deem\nnecessary for continuation of such status.\n  3. If the fund chooses to secure the payment of workers' compensation\npursuant to the workers' compensation law by purchasing an insurance\npolicy from the state insurance fund or a, licensed insurer, it shall\nfile with the department no later than thirty days after the\ncommencement of a new policy year a copy of the policy it has purchased.\nIn such case, the department shall be treated by the insurer as a\ncertificate holder for purposes of receiving notice of cancellation of\nthe policy.\n  4. No provision of this article shall be construed to alter or affect\nthe liability under the workers' compensation law of any central\ndispatch facility with respect to black car operators prior to the fund\nliability date.\n  * 5. The fund shall have the authority to provide additional health\nbenefits, consistent with its plan of operation, for all black car\noperators entitled thereto pursuant to this chapter, provided that the\nfund shall have complied with all applicable statutory and regulatory\nrequirements. The surcharge amount not related to payments of workers'\ncompensation claims and the administration of those claims shall be up\nto one-half of one percent (0.5%).\n  * NB Repealed December 20, 2028\n
N.Y. ABC Law § 54-B — New York Code / Act ABC / Article 4 / Section 54-B
Beer tasting
Status: in_force

§ 54-b. Beer tasting. Any person holding a retail license to sell beer\nunder this chapter shall be permitted to conduct consumer tastings of\nbeer upon such person's licensed premises. All such tastings shall be\nsubject to the following limitations:\n  (a) Tastings of beer shall be conducted by the licensee or an\nauthorized agent of the licensee. Provided, however, a licensed beer or\ncider wholesaler shall not serve as the authorized agent for another\nentity, nor shall a licensed beer or cider wholesaler be involved in any\nmanner with a beer tasting conducted by another entity.\n  (b) No more than three samples of beer may be provided to a person in\none calendar day.\n  (c) No sample may exceed three fluid ounces.\n  (d) No tasting shall be held during the hours prohibited by the\nprovisions of section one hundred five of this chapter.\n  (e) Any liability stemming from a right of action resulting from a\ntasting authorized by this section and in accordance with the provisions\nof sections 11-100 and 11-101 of the general obligations law shall\naccrue to the licensee.\n  (f) No person under the age of twenty-one shall be permitted to serve\na sample or handle an open container of beer.\n
N.Y. TWN Law § 213 — New York Code / Act TWN / Article 13 / Section 213
Qualification of voters
Status: in_force

§ 213. Qualification of voters. No person shall be entitled to vote\nfor improvement district commissioners unless he or she is a registered\nvoter who shall have resided in the improvement district for a period of\nthirty days next preceding any election of commissioners.\n
N.Y. PBS Law § 66-N — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 4 / Section 66-N
Net metering study
Status: in_force

§ 66-n. Net metering study. The commission shall conduct a study to\nanalyze the economic and environmental benefits from and the economic\ncost burden, if any, of the net energy metering program and to analyze\nthe extent to which ratepayers receiving service under the net energy\nmetering program are paying the full cost of services provided to them\nby combined electric and gas corporations and gas corporations, and the\nextent to which their customers pay a share of costs of public purpose\nprograms through assessments on their electric and/or gas bills. In\nanalyzing program costs and benefits for the purposes of this study, the\ncommission shall consider all electricity generated by renewable\nelectric generating systems eligible for net metering under sections\nsixty-six-j and sixty-six-l of this article, including the electricity\nused onsite to reduce the customer's consumption of electricity that\nwould otherwise be supplied through the electrical grid, as well as\nelectrical output that is being fed back to the electrical grid for\nwhich the customer receives credit or net surplus electricity\ncompensation under net energy metering. As it relates to the\nenvironmental benefits, the study shall quantify the approximate avoided\nlevel of harmful emissions including, but not limited to, information\nconcerning: nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide, as well\nas other air pollutants deemed necessary and appropriate for study by\nthe commission. The study shall also quantify the economic costs and\nbenefits of net energy metering to participants and non-participants and\nshall further disaggregate the results by utility. The study shall also\ngather and present data on the income distribution of residential net\nmetering participants that is publicly available and aggregated by zip\ncode and county. In order to assess the economic costs and benefits at\nvarious levels of net metering implementation, the study shall be\nconducted using multiple net energy metering penetration scenarios.\n  The commission shall publish a report from its findings. The report\nmust be published within three hundred sixty-five days of the effective\ndate of this section. A copy of the report must be furnished to the\ntemporary president of the Senate, the speaker of the Assembly, the\nchair of the Senate energy and telecommunications committee and the\nchair of the Assembly energy committee.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 959-A — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 18-B / Section 959-A
Rescinding of local incentives
Status: in_force

§ 959-a. Rescinding of local incentives. Should a certified business\nenterprise in an empire zone be decertified, any local incentive\nprovided by such municipality may be rescinded by local law or\nresolution by the governing body of such municipality, notwithstanding\nsubdivision five of section four hundred eighty-five-e of the real\nproperty tax law.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 7203 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 72 / Section 7203
Authorization and execution of domestication agreement
Status: in_force

§ 7203. Authorization and execution of domestication agreement. (a)\nSuch domestication agreement shall be authorized, adopted, approved,\nsigned and acknowledged by the alien insurer pursuant to the laws of the\ncountry where organized.\n  (b) Such agreement shall also be approved, adopted and authorized by\nthe acquiring insurer's board of directors and executed by its president\nor any vice president and attested by its secretary or assistant\nsecretary under its corporate seal, or, in the case of a foreign\ninsurer, as otherwise provided in the laws of the state of its domicile.\n