FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. EXC Law § 133 — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 6 / Section 133
Certification of notarial signatures
Status: in_force

§ 133. Certification of notarial signatures. The county clerk of a\ncounty in whose office any notary public has qualified or has filed\ntheir autograph signature and a certificate of official character,\nshall, when so requested and upon payment of a fee of three dollars,\naffix to any certificate of proof or acknowledgment or oath signed by\nsuch notary anywhere in the state of New York, a certificate under their\nhand and seal, stating that a commission or a certificate of official\ncharacter of such notary with their autograph signature has been filed\nin the county clerk's office, and that the county clerk was at the time\nof taking such proof or acknowledgment or oath duly authorized to take\nthe same; that the county clerk is well acquainted with the handwriting\nof such notary public or has compared the signature on the certificate\nof proof or acknowledgment or oath with the autograph signature\ndeposited in their office by such notary public and believes that the\nsignature is genuine. An instrument with such certificate of\nauthentication of the county clerk affixed thereto shall be entitled to\nbe read in evidence or to be recorded in any of the counties of this\nstate in respect to which a certificate of a county clerk may be\nnecessary for either purpose. In addition to the foregoing powers, a\ncounty clerk of a county in whose office a notary public has qualified\nmay certify the signature of an electronic notary public, registered\nwith the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred\nthirty-five-c of this article, provided such county clerk has received\nfrom the secretary of state, an exemplar of the notary public's\nregistered electronic signature.\n
N.Y. EDN Law § 1722 — New York Code / Act EDN / Title 2 / Article 35 / Section 1722
Application of article
Status: in_force

§ 1722. Application of article.  The provisions of this article shall\napply to all union free school districts heretofore organized pursuant\nto the provisions of chapter four hundred thirty-three of the laws of\neighteen hundred fifty-three, and the amendments thereof, chapter five\nhundred fifty-five of the laws of eighteen hundred sixty-four, and the\namendments thereof, and of chapter five hundred fifty-six of the laws of\neighteen hundred ninety-four and the amendments thereof; and sections\nseventeen hundred seventeen, four hundred one, subdivision one, four\nhundred sixteen and seventeen hundred nineteen, subdivision three, of\nthis chapter are made applicable to all school districts established by\nand organized under special statutes, except those of cities; and\nsections seventeen hundred eleven and four hundred one, subdivision two,\nof this chapter are made applicable to all school districts, except\nthose of cities, having a population of five thousand and upwards\nestablished by and organized under special statutes.\n
N.Y. ETP Law § 14 — New York Code / Act ETP / Section 14
Application of act
Status: in_force

§ 14. Application of act. The provisions of this act shall be\napplicable:\n  a. in the city of New York; and\n  b. in all counties within the state of New York outside the city of\nNew York and shall become and remain effective only in a city, town or\nvillage located therein as provided in section three of this act.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 4545 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 45 / Section 4545
Admissibility of collateral source of payment
Status: in_force

§ 4545. Admissibility of collateral source of payment. (a) Actions for\npersonal injury, injury to property or wrongful death. In any action\nbrought to recover damages for personal injury, injury to property or\nwrongful death, where the plaintiff seeks to recover for the cost of\nmedical care, dental care, custodial care or rehabilitation services,\nloss of earnings or other economic loss, evidence shall be admissible\nfor consideration by the court to establish that any such past or future\ncost or expense was or will, with reasonable certainty, be replaced or\nindemnified, in whole or in part, from any collateral source, except for\nlife insurance and those payments as to which there is a statutory right\nof reimbursement. If the court finds that any such cost or expense was\nor will, with reasonable certainty, be replaced or indemnified from any\nsuch collateral source, it shall reduce the amount of the award by such\nfinding, minus an amount equal to the premiums paid by the plaintiff for\nsuch benefits for the two-year period immediately preceding the accrual\nof such action and minus an amount equal to the projected future cost to\nthe plaintiff of maintaining such benefits. In order to find that any\nfuture cost or expense will, with reasonable certainty, be replaced or\nindemnified by the collateral source, the court must find that the\nplaintiff is legally entitled to the continued receipt of such\ncollateral source, pursuant to a contract or otherwise enforceable\nagreement, subject only to the continued payment of a premium and such\nother financial obligations as may be required by such agreement. Any\ncollateral source deduction required by this subdivision shall be made\nby the trial court after the rendering of the jury's verdict. The\nplaintiff may prove his or her losses and expenses at the trial\nirrespective of whether such sums will later have to be deducted from\nthe plaintiff's recovery.\n  (b) Voluntary charitable contributions excluded as a collateral source\nof payment. Voluntary charitable contributions received by an injured\nparty shall not be considered to be a collateral source of payment that\nis admissible in evidence to reduce the amount of any award, judgment or\nsettlement.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 177-A — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 5-B / Section 177-A
Declaration of legislative findings and intent
Status: in_force

§ 177-a. Declaration of legislative findings and intent. The\nlegislature hereby finds and declares that an emergency of grave\ndimensions exists in narcotics law enforcement in cities having a\npopulation of one million or more.  The overall law enforcement effort\nhas not been successful in stemming the distribution of narcotic drugs.\nThe legislature finds that the ineffectiveness of official efforts to\ncontain the narcotics traffic is due in significant part to the\ninability of the overburdened criminal justice system to cope with the\nenormous volume of narcotics cases.\n  The legislature further finds that this crisis, which transcends the\ntraditional jurisdictional boundaries of the counties wholly contained\nwithin such cities having a population of one million or more, demands\ncoordinated prosecution, centralized direction and the infusion of\nmassive new resources.\n  The legislature declares that without these new directions and\nresources, this crisis will intensify and very shortly overwhelm the\nalready strained criminal justice system.\n  Based upon the above findings the legislature hereby declares that an\nemergency narcotics court program is required.\n  It is the intent of the legislature that the emergency narcotics\nprogram should be coordinated by the division of criminal justice of the\noffice of planning services in cooperation with the criminal justice\ncoordinating councils of such cities. The program would be implemented\nby the joint efforts of the district attorneys of the counties within\ncities having a population of one million or more, the judiciary, and\nother criminal justice services acting in accordance with a mutually\nagreed upon plan. The legislature contemplates that the program\nauthorized herein shall consist of the establishment of special\nnarcotics parts in the supreme court in cities having a population of\none million or more to hear and determine narcotic cases from within\ncounties wholly contained in a city having a population of one million\nor more, commencing not later than the September nineteen hundred\nseventy-two term and continuing thereafter during the duration of the\nemergency.\n  The legislature declares that the resources necessary for these\nspecial narcotics parts of the supreme court can be made available only\nthrough a combination of federal funds from the law enforcement\nassistance administration of the United States department of justice,\nand state and local funds, services and facilities.  To this end the\nlegislature declares that in order to utilize presently appropriated\nfederal funds, all necessary agreements shall be entered into forthwith.\n
N.Y. BSW Law § 29 — New York Code / Act BSW / Section 29
Notice of contest or exhibition; collection of tax
Status: in_force

* § 29. Notice of contest or exhibition; collection of tax. 1. Every\nindividual, corporation, association or club holding any professional or\namateur boxing, sparring or professional wrestling match or exhibition,\nfor which an admission fee is charged or received, shall notify the\nathletic commission ten days in advance of the holding of such contest.\nAll tickets of admission to any such boxing, sparring or professional\nwrestling match or exhibition shall be procured from a printer duly\nauthorized by the state athletic commission to print such tickets and\nshall bear clearly upon the face thereof the purchase price and location\nof same. Any individual, corporation, association or club failing to\nfully comply with this section shall be subject to a penalty of fifty\ndollars to be collected by and paid to the department of state. Any\nindividual, corporation, association or club is prohibited from\noperating any shows or exhibitions until all penalties due pursuant to\nthis section and taxes, interest and penalties due pursuant to article\nnineteen of the tax law have been paid.\n  2. Pursuant to direction by the commissioner of taxation and finance,\nemployees or officers of the athletic commission shall act as agents of\nthe commissioner of taxation and finance to collect the tax imposed by\narticle nineteen of the tax law. The athletic commission shall provide\nthe commissioner of taxation and finance with such information and\ntechnical assistance as may be necessary for the proper administration\nof such tax.\n  * NB Repealed September 1, 2016\n
N.Y. RPP Law § 447-G — New York Code / Act RPP / Article 12-D / Section 447-G
Data sharing
Status: in_force

§ 447-g. Data sharing. Booking services shall provide to the\ndepartment of state, at the same times and on the same recurring basis\nthat they provide data pursuant to subdivision three of section four\nhundred forty-seven-b of this article, an electronic report aggregating\nthe number of short-term rental unit guest stays that the booking\nservice facilitated within the state for the applicable reporting\nperiod, which shall be for the ninety days preceding the date of\nproduction in the case of the first such report and for the period since\nthe prior report for each subsequent report. The report shall include\nthe aggregate number of short-term rental unit guest stays that the\nbooking service facilitated during the applicable reporting period for\neach county where the listings are located. Such electronic report shall\nbe in a form and manner as determined by the department of state.\n
N.Y. SCC Law § 142 — New York Code / Act SCC / Article 9 / Section 142
Powers and duties of members of police department
Status: in_force

§ 142. Powers and duties of members of police department. The members\nof the police department, other than surgeons, in criminal matters have\nall the powers of police officers under the general laws of the state,\nand they shall also have the power and it shall be their duty to arrest\nany person found by them violating any of the penal ordinances of the\ncity or laws of the state, and to take such person before the proper\ncity magistrate. Such person shall be dealt with in the same manner as\nif he had been arrested upon a warrant theretofore duly issued by such\nmagistrate. They shall report violations of law and ordinances coming to\ntheir knowledge in any way under regulations to be prescribed by the\ncommissioner of public safety. They shall also have, in every other part\nof the state, in criminal matters all the powers of constables and any\nwarrant for search or arrest issued by any magistrate of the state may\nbe executed by them in any part of the state according to the tenor\nthereof without indorsement. They shall possess such other powers and\nperform such other duties as may be provided by law or ordinance of the\ncommon council.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 324-A — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 25-AAA / Section 324-A
Municipal agricultural and farmland protection plans
Status: in_force

§ 324-a. Municipal agricultural and farmland protection plans. 1.\nMunicipalities may develop agricultural and farmland protection plans,\nin cooperation with cooperative extension and other organizations,\nincluding local farmers. These plans shall include, but not be limited\nto:\n  (a) the location of any land or areas proposed to be protected;\n  (b) an analysis of the following factors concerning any areas and\nlands proposed to be protected:\n  (i) value to the agricultural economy of the municipality;\n  (ii) open space value;\n  (iii) consequences of possible conversion; and\n  (iv) level of conversion pressure on the lands or areas proposed to be\nprotected; and\n  (c) a description of activities, programs and strategies, including\nefforts to support the successful transfer of agricultural land from\nexisting owners to new owners and operators, especially new and\nbeginning farmers, intended to be used by the municipality to promote\ncontinued agricultural use, which may include but not be limited to\nrevisions to the municipality's comprehensive plan pursuant to section\ntwo hundred seventy-two-a of the town law or section 7-722 of the\nvillage law as appropriate.\n  2. The municipality shall conduct at least one public hearing for\npublic input regarding such agricultural and farmland protection plan,\nand shall thereafter submit such plan to the municipal legislative body\nand the county agricultural farmland protection board for approval.\n  3. The municipal agricultural and farmland protection plan must be\nsubmitted by the municipality to the commissioner for approval.\n
N.Y. PTR Law § 121-801 — New York Code / Act PTR / Article 8-A / Section 121-801
Nonjudicial dissolution
Status: in_force

§ 121-801. Nonjudicial dissolution. A limited partnership is dissolved\nand its affairs shall be wound up upon the happening of the first to\noccur of the following:\n  (a) at the time, if any, provided in the certificate of limited\npartnership;\n  (b) at the time or upon the happening of events specified in the\npartnership agreement;\n  (c) subject to any requirement in the partnership agreement requiring\napproval by any greater or lesser percentage of limited partners and\ngeneral partners, upon the written consent (1) of all of the general\npartners and (2) of a majority in interest of each class of limited\npartners;\n  (d) an event of withdrawal of a general partner unless (1) at the time\nthere is at least one other general partner and the partnership\nagreement permits the business of the limited partnership to be carried\non by the remaining general partner and that partner does so, or (2)\nunless the partnership agreement provides otherwise, if within ninety\ndays after the withdrawal of the last general partner, not less than a\nmajority in interest of the limited partners agree in writing to\ncontinue the business of the limited partnership and to the appointment,\neffective as of the date of withdrawal, of one or more additional\ngeneral partners if necessary or desired; or\n  (e) entry of a decree of judicial dissolution under section 121-802 of\nthis article.\n  (f) a limited partnership whose original certificate of limited\npartnership was filed with the secretary of state and effective prior to\nthe effective date of this subdivision shall continue to be governed by\nthis section as in effect on such date and shall not be governed by this\nsection, unless otherwise provided in the partnership agreement.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 99 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 9 / Section 99
Issue of bill of lading containing false statement
Status: in_force

§ 99. Issue of bill of lading containing false statement. Any officer,\nagent, or servant of a common carrier, who with intent to defraud issues\nor aids in issuing a bill of lading for goods knowing that it contains\nany false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. CMA Law § 6 — New York Code / Act CMA / Section JR1S6
Application
Status: in_force

§ 6. Application. The provisions of this Joint  Rule  shall  apply  to\nbills  and  amendments proposed for introduction at the nineteen hundred\neighty-five regular legislative session and permanently thereafter.\n