FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. BNK Law § 221-I — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 5-B / Section 221-I
Notice of acquisition of control or merger
Status: in_force

§ 221-i. Notice of acquisition of control or merger. 1.  A foreign\nbanking corporation licensed pursuant to this article to maintain a\nrepresentative office in this state shall file with the superintendent a\nnotice, in such form and containing such information as the\nsuperintendent may prescribe, no later than fourteen calendar days after\nsuch foreign banking corporation becomes aware of any acquisition of\ncontrol of such corporation or merges with another foreign banking\ncorporation.\n  2. Control, for purposes of this section, means any person or entity,\nor group of persons or entities acting in concert, directly or\nindirectly, owning, controlling, or holding with power to vote,\ntwenty-five percent or more of any class of voting stock of such foreign\nbanking corporation, or having the ability in any manner to elect a\nmajority of the directors of such foreign banking corporation, or\notherwise exercising a controlling influence over the management and\npolicies of such foreign banking corporation as defined by the\nsuperintendent by regulation.\n
N.Y. UJC Law § 1302 — New York Code / Act UJC / Article 13 / Section 1302
Adjournment of trial
Status: in_force

§ 1302. Adjournment of trial.\n  The trial of an action may be adjourned:\n  (a) By the court for good cause shown and upon such terms and\nconditions as the court may deem just.\n  (b) By stipulation of the parties with the approval of the court, such\nstipulation to be filed with the clerk; or upon request of the plaintiff\nwhere the defendant has made default; or, if the court approve, upon\nconsent of the parties in open court.\n
N.Y. MHY Law § 15.01 — New York Code / Act MHY / Title C / Article 15 / Section 15.01
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 15.01 Definitions.\n  As used in this article:\n  "in need of care and treatment" means that a person has a\ndevelopmental disability and would benefit from care and treatment as a\nresident in a school.\n  "in need of involuntary care and treatment" means that a person is in\nneed of in-patient care and treatment as a resident in a school, that\nsuch care and treatment is essential to his or her welfare, and that his\nor her judgment is so impaired that he or she is unable to understand\nthe need for such care and treatment and that he or she poses a real and\npresent risk of substantial physical harm to himself or herself or\nothers.\n  "need for retention" means that a person who has been admitted to a\nschool pursuant to this article is in need of involuntary care and\ntreatment in a school for a further period.\n  "record" of a patient shall consist of admission, transfer or\nretention papers and orders, and accompanying data required by this\narticle and by the regulations of the commissioner.\n  "director of community services" means the director of community\nservices for the mentally disabled appointed pursuant to article eleven\nof this chapter.\n  any provisions of this article which explicitly or implicitly apply\nto, or reference, persons who are, or who are alleged to be, mentally\nretarded shall be deemed to apply to, or to be a reference to, persons\nwho are, or who are alleged to be, developmentally disabled.\n
N.Y. ACA Law § 55.19 — New York Code / Act ACA / Title T / Article 55 / Section 55.19
Members and employees not to profit
Status: in_force

§ 55.19. Members and employees not to profit. No officer, member or\nemployee of the trust shall receive or may be lawfully entitled to\nreceive any pecuniary profit from the operation thereof except\nreasonable compensation for services in effecting one or more of its\npurposes herein set forth.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 7505 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 75 / Section 7505
Powers of arbitrator
Status: in_force

§ 7505. Powers of arbitrator. An arbitrator and any attorney of record\nin the arbitration proceeding has the power to issue subpoenas. An\narbitrator has the power to administer oaths.\n
N.Y. WKC Law § 31 — New York Code / Act WKC / Article 2 / Section 31
Agreement for contribution by employee void
Status: in_force

§ 31. Agreement for contribution by employee void. No agreement by an\nemployee to pay any portion of the premium paid by his employer to the\nstate insurance fund or to contribute to a benefit fund or department\nmaintained by such employer or to the cost of mutual insurance or other\ninsurance, maintained for or carried for the purpose of providing\ncompensation as herein required, shall be valid, and any employer who\nmakes a deduction for such purpose from the wages or salary of any\nemployee entitled to the benefits of this chapter shall be guilty of a\nmisdemeanor.\n
N.Y. LLC Law § 418 — New York Code / Act LLC / Article 4 / Section 418
Classes and voting of members
Status: in_force

§ 418. Classes and voting of members. (a) The articles of organization\nof a limited liability company may provide for classes or groups of\nmembers having such relative rights, powers, preferences and limitations\nas the operating agreement of such limited liability company may\nprovide. The articles of organization may make provision for the future\ncreation, in the manner provided in the operating agreement, of\nadditional classes of members having such relative rights, powers,\npreferences and limitations as may from time to time be established\npursuant to the operating agreement, including rights, powers,\npreferences, limitations and duties senior to existing classes of\nmembers.  The operating agreement may grant to or withhold from all or\none or more classes of members the right to vote upon any matter on the\nbasis of capital contributions, capital commitments or capital accounts\nor on a per capita, class or other basis.\n  (b) The operating agreement may set forth provisions relating to\nnotice of the time, place or purpose of any meeting at which any matter\nis to be voted on by any members, waiver of any such notice, action by\nconsent without a meeting, the establishment of a record date, quorum\nrequirements, voting in person or by proxy or any other matter with\nrespect to the exercise of any such right to vote.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 2322 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 23 / Section 2322
Final determination; procedure on orders without hearing
Status: in_force

§ 2322. Final determination; procedure on orders without hearing.  (a)\nAfter a final determination against an insurer, the amount of any\novercharge received by such insurer during the pendency of the\nproceedings, with interest thereon, shall upon demand be refunded by the\ninsurer to the persons entitled thereto.\n  (b) Any insurer or rate service organization to which the\nsuperintendent has directed an order made without a hearing may, within\nthirty days after notice to it of the order, make written request to the\nsuperintendent for a hearing.  Pending a hearing and a decision\naffirming, reversing or modifying his previous action, the\nsuperintendent may suspend or postpone the effective date of his\nprevious action.\n
N.Y. STF Law § 214 — New York Code / Act STF / Article 15 / Section 214
Establishment and purpose; linked deposit program authorization
Status: in_force

§ 214. Establishment and purpose; linked deposit program\nauthorization.  The excelsior linked deposit program is hereby created.\nThe purpose of the program is to encourage and assist eligible\nbusinesses within the state to undertake eligible projects that will\nmaterially contribute to improving their performance and\ncompetitiveness. The comptroller is hereby authorized to use any moneys\nof the state the comptroller is authorized to invest pursuant to section\nninety-eight-a of this chapter as linked deposits for the program. Not\nmore than one billion dollars of such moneys shall be on deposit\npursuant to the program at any given time. The commissioner of taxation\nand finance is hereby authorized to use funds in the linked deposit\nprogram fund established pursuant to section ninety-two-v of this\nchapter as linked deposits for the program.  Not more than one hundred\nmillion dollars from the linked deposit program fund shall be on deposit\npursuant to the program at any given time.\n
N.Y. FIS Law § 609 — New York Code / Act FIS / Article 6 / Section 609
Reporting on new criteria for determining a reasonable fee
Status: in_force

* § 609. Reporting on new criteria for determining a reasonable fee.\nFour years after the effective date of this section the superintendent\nof the department of financial services shall submit a report to the\ngovernor, the speaker of the assembly, the temporary president of the\nsenate, the chair of the assembly insurance committee, and the chair of\nthe senate insurance committee that provides information about disputes\ninvolving a health benefit plan operated pursuant to article eleven of\nthe civil service law since the effective date of the chapter of the\nlaws of two thousand twenty-six that added this section and that\nincludes the outcomes of all such disputes in the aggregate and broken\ndown by region and provider specialty.\n  * NB Repealed May 28, 2031\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 336 — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 6-A / Section 336
County of Broome enhanced 911 emergency telephone system
Status: in_force

* § 336. County of Broome enhanced 911 emergency telephone system. 1.\nNotwithstanding the provisions of any law to the contrary, the county of\nBroome acting through its local county legislative body, is hereby\nauthorized and empowered to adopt, amend or repeal local laws to impose\na surcharge, in addition to the surcharge established and imposed under\nsection three hundred three of this chapter, in an amount not to exceed\none dollar and thirty cents per access line per month on the customers\nof every service supplier within such municipality to pay for the costs\nassociated with obtaining, operating and maintaining the\ntelecommunication equipment and telephone services needed to provide an\nenhanced 911 (E911) emergency telephone system to serve such county.\n  2. Any such local law shall state the amount of the surcharge, the\ndate on which the service supplier shall begin to add such surcharge to\nthe billings of its customers and, to the extent practicable, the date\non which such E911 service is to begin. Such local law may authorize the\nservice supplier to begin billing its customers for such surcharge prior\nto the date the E911 system service is to begin.\n  3. Any service supplier within a municipality which has imposed a\nsurcharge pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be given a\nminimum of forty-five days written notice prior to the date it shall\nbegin to add such surcharge to the billings of its customers or prior to\nany modification to or change in the surcharge amount.\n  4. The surcharge established pursuant to the provisions of this\nsection shall be imposed on a per access line basis on all current bills\nrendered for local exchange access service within the 911 service area.\n  5. No such surcharge shall be imposed upon more than seventy-five\nexchange access lines per customer per location.\n  6. Lifeline customers, a public safety agency and any municipality\nwhich has enacted a local law pursuant to the provisions of this section\nshall be exempt from any surcharge imposed under this section.\n  * NB There are 2 § 336's\n  * NB Repealed July 27, 2029\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 3-510 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 3 / Part 5 / Section 3-510
Evidence of Dishonor and Notice of Dishonor
Status: in_force

Section 3--510. Evidence of Dishonor and Notice of Dishonor.\n  The following are admissible as evidence and create a presumption of\ndishonor and of any notice of dishonor therein shown:\n  (a) a document regular in form as provided in the preceding section\nwhich purports to be a protest;\n  (b) the purported stamp or writing of the drawee, payor bank or\npresenting bank on the instrument or accompanying it stating that\nacceptance or payment has been refused for reasons consistent with\ndishonor;\n  (c) any book or record of the drawee, payor bank, or any collecting\nbank kept in the usual course of business which shows dishonor, even\nthough there is no evidence of who made the entry.\n
N.Y. STL Law § 52-A — New York Code / Act STL / Article 4 / Section 52-A
Governor may execute deed or release with sundry reservations; Fort Drum
Status: in_force

§ 52-a. 1. Governor may execute deed or release with sundry\nreservations; Fort Drum. The governor is hereby authorized to cede to\nthe United States full concurrent jurisdiction over the tracts of land\ncomprising the Fort Drum military installation and any other lands that\nmay be acquired by the United States for military purposes at or near\nFort Drum upon conditions that the jurisdiction so ceded should not\nprevent the execution on such tracts of any process, civil or criminal,\nissued under the authority of this state, nor prevent from operating\nwithin the bounds of such tracts any of the laws or regulations of the\nstate, not incompatible with the free use and enjoyment of the premises\nby the United States or the purposes for which such cession is made, nor\nprevent from operating within the same tracts or parcels of land the\nlaws or ordinances of the counties of Jefferson, Lewis and St. Lawrence,\nor the towns thereof, not incompatible with the free use and enjoyment\nof the premises by the United States or the purposes for which such\ncession is made; and that the United States shall retain such\njurisdiction so long only as such tracts or parcels of land shall be\nused for military purposes.\n  2. Sections fifty-two, fifty-three, fifty-five and fifty-six of this\narticle shall not apply to the provisions of section fifty-two-a of this\narticle.\n
N.Y. STF Law § 63 — New York Code / Act STF / Article 5 / Section 63
Expense of preparing and selling bonds
Status: in_force

§ 63. Expense of preparing and selling bonds. From the moneys realized\nfrom the sale of bonds heretofore or hereafter authorized the\ncomptroller shall apportion the expense of preparing and selling such\nbonds against the appropriation or appropriations, and shall use such\napportioned funds in paying such expenses.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 343-K*2 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 343-K*2
Portion of state highway system to be designated as the "POW-MIA Bridge"
Status: in_force

* § 343-k. Portion of state highway system to be designated as the\n"POW-MIA Bridge". All that portion of the state highway system\nconstituting the Route 14 bridge, located across the Erie Canal north of\nroute 31 in the town of Lyons, county of Wayne shall be known as the\n"POW-MIA Bridge".\n  * NB There are 7 § 343-k's\n
N.Y. EPT Law § 3-4.3 — New York Code / Act EPT / Article 3 / Part 4 / Section 3-4.3
Revocatory effect of a conveyance, settlement or other act
Status: in_force

§ 3-4.3 Revocatory effect of a conveyance, settlement or other act\n          affecting property previously disposed of by will\n  A conveyance, settlement or other act of a testator by which an estate\nin his property, previously disposed of by will, is altered but not\nwholly divested does not revoke such disposition, but the estate in the\nproperty that remains in the testator passes to the beneficiaries\npursuant to the disposition.  However, any such conveyance, settlement\nor other act of the testator which is wholly inconsistent with such\nprevious testamentary disposition revokes it.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 92 — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 6 / Section 92
Deputies
Status: in_force

§ 92. Deputies. The secretary of state shall appoint a deputy, who may\nperform all the duties of the secretary of state. Any such deputy shall\nreceive an annual salary to be fixed by the secretary of state within\nthe amount appropriated therefor. The secretary of state may also\nappoint and fix the compensation of such other deputies, assistants and\nemployees as he shall deem necessary within the amount appropriated\ntherefor and prescribe their powers and duties.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 177-D — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 5-B / Section 177-D
Special narcotics parts; procedure
Status: in_force

§ 177-d. Special narcotics parts; procedure. Notwithstanding any other\nprovision of law,\n  (i) a narcotics indictment returned in any county within such cities\nmay be prosecuted in the special narcotics part to which it is assigned\npursuant to section one hundred seventy-seven-b irrespective of the\ncounty in which the part is held and in which the crime charged was\ncommitted;\n  (ii) any assistant district attorney appointed pursuant to the plan\nauthorized by section one hundred seventy-seven-c may prosecute all\noffenses cognizable by any special narcotics part irrespective of the\ncounty in which the part is held and in which the crime charged was\ncommitted; and\n  (iii) upon the application of the assistant district attorney in\ncharge of the special narcotics parts appointed pursuant to the plan\nauthorized by section one hundred seventy-seven-c, one or more grand\njuries may be drawn and impaneled for a special narcotics part upon the\norder of the justice assigned to such part, which grand jury may\nexercise all the powers of a grand jury in the county in which it is\nimpaneled and may in addition exercise its powers with respect to the\nalleged commission of an offense in any county wholly contained in a\ncity having a population of one million or more involving the sale or\npossession of a narcotic drug and any other offense that could be\nproperly joined therewith in an indictment.\n
N.Y. PBO Law § 97 — New York Code / Act PBO / Article 6-A / Section 97
Civil remedies
Status: in_force

§ 97. Civil remedies. (1) Any data subject aggrieved by any action\ntaken under this article may seek judicial review and relief pursuant to\narticle seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules.\n  (2) In any proceeding brought under subdivision one of this section,\nthe party defending the action shall bear the burden of proof, and the\ncourt may, if the data subject substantially prevails against any agency\nand if the agency lacked a reasonable basis pursuant to this article for\nthe challenged action, award to the data subject reasonable attorneys'\nfees and disbursements reasonably incurred.\n  (3) Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit or abridge the\nright of any person to obtain judicial review or pecuniary or other\nrelief, in any other form or upon any other basis, otherwise available\nto a person aggrieved by any agency action under this article.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 870-H — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 27 / Section 870-H
Notice to owners
Status: in_force

§ 870-h. Notice to owners. The commissioner shall furnish to all\nowners, lessees and operators of amusement devices, viewing stands and\ntents notice of all rights and obligations prescribed under this article\nupon receipt of permit applications.\n
N.Y. EPT Law § 10-10.1 — New York Code / Act EPT / Article 10 / Part 10 / Section 10-10.1
Power to distribute principal or allocate income; restriction
Status: in_force

§ 10-10.1 Power to distribute principal or allocate income; restriction\n            on exercise\n  A power held by a person as trustee of an express trust to make a\ndiscretionary distribution of either principal or income to such person\nas a beneficiary, or to make discretionary allocations in such person's\nfavor of receipts or expenses as between principal and income, cannot be\nexercised by such person unless (1) such person is the grantor of the\ntrust and the trust is revocable by such person during such person's\nlifetime, or (2) the power is a power to provide for such person's\nhealth, education, maintenance or support within the meaning of sections\n2041 and 2514 of the Internal Revenue Code, or (3) the trust instrument,\nby express reference to this section, provides otherwise. If the power\nis conferred on two or more trustees, it may be exercised by the trustee\nor trustees who are not so disqualified. If there is no trustee\nqualified to exercise the power, its exercise devolves on the supreme\ncourt or the surrogate's court, except that if the power is created by\nwill, its exercise devolves on the surrogate's court having jurisdiction\nof the estate of the donor of the power.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 581-701 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 5-C / Part 7 / Section 581-701
Remedial
Status: in_force

§ 581-701. Remedial. This legislation is hereby declared to be a\nremedial statute and is to be construed liberally to secure the\nbeneficial interests and purposes thereof for the best interests of the\nchild.\n
N.Y. SCT Law § 66 — New York Code / Act SCT / Article 2 / Section 66
Cancellation of void tax
Status: in_force

§ 66. Cancellation of void tax. When it shall be discovered that the\nproceedings in levying any tax, or in making any assessment, have been\nso irregular as to render them illegal and void, the board of\nsupervisors may annul them, or may annul all of them, subsequent to and\nincluding the irregularity, and such board may direct the board of\nassessors of the town in which said property is located to levy anew\nsuch tax or assessment, or such board may direct the proceedings anew\nfrom the point where the irregularity occurred.\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 363 — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 7 / Section 363
Supplemental appropriations
Status: in_force

§ 363. Supplemental appropriations. The board of supervisors, during a\nfiscal year, by resolution, may make additional appropriations or\nincrease existing appropriations, the funds therefor to be provided from\nany unencumbered balances in appropriations pursuant to section three\nhundred sixty-four of this article, the contingent funds pursuant to\nsection three hundred sixty-five of this article, or unanticipated\nrevenues and unappropriated unreserved fund balance pursuant to section\nthree hundred sixty-six of this article, or pursuant to the local\nfinance law.\n
N.Y. CCO Law § 93 — New York Code / Act CCO / Article 5-A / Section 93
Internal capital account cooperatives
Status: in_force

§ 93. Internal capital account cooperatives. 1. A worker cooperative\nmay provide in its by-laws that it shall operate as an internal capital\naccount cooperative. An internal account cooperative is a worker\ncooperative whose entire net book value is reflected in internal capital\naccounts, one for each member, and a collective reserve account, and in\nwhich no persons other than members own capital stock.  In an internal\ncapital account cooperative, each member shall have one and only one\nvote in any matter requiring voting by stockholders.\n  2. An internal capital account cooperative shall credit the paid-in\nmembership fee and additional paid-in capital of a member to the\nmember's internal capital account, and shall also record the\napportionment of net retained proceeds or net losses to the members in\naccordance with patronage by appropriately crediting or debiting the\ninternal capital accounts of members. The collective reserve account in\nan internal capital account cooperative shall reflect any paid-in\ncapital, net losses and net retained proceeds not allocated to\nindividual members.\n  3. In an internal capital account cooperative, the balances in all the\nindividual internal capital accounts and collective reserve account, if\nany, shall be adjusted at the end of each accounting period so that the\nsum of the balances is equal to the net book value of the worker\ncooperative.\n  4. Section six hundred twenty-three of the business corporation law\nshall not apply to an internal capital account cooperative.\n