FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. BNK Law § 206 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 5 / Section 206
Termination of existence
Status: in_force

§ 206. Termination of existence. When a foreign banking corporation\nlicensed pursuant to article two of this chapter is dissolved or its\nauthority or existence is otherwise terminated or cancelled in the\njurisdiction of its incorporation, a certificate of the superintendent\nof financial services, or official performing the equivalent function as\nto records of banking corporations, of the jurisdiction of incorporation\nof such foreign banking corporation attesting to the occurrence of any\nsuch event or a certified copy of an order or decree of a court of such\njurisdiction directing the dissolution of such foreign banking\ncorporation, the termination of its existence or the cancellation of its\nauthority shall be delivered to the superintendent. The filing of the\ncertificate, order or decree shall have the same effect as the\nrevocation of its license under section forty of this chapter. The\nsuperintendent shall continue as agent of the foreign banking\ncorporation upon whom process against it may be served in any action or\nspecial proceeding based upon any liability or obligation incurred by\nthe foreign banking corporation within this state prior to the filing of\nsuch certificate, order or decree and he shall promptly cause a copy of\nsuch process to be mailed by registered mail, return receipt requested,\nto such foreign corporation at the post office address on file in his\noffice specified for such purpose. The post office address may be\nchanged in the manner provided in section two hundred of this article.\n
N.Y. DCD Law § 151 — New York Code / Act DCD / Article 6-A / Section 151
Right of set off against unmatured debts
Status: in_force

§ 151. Right of set off against unmatured debts. Every debtor shall\nhave the right upon:\n  (a) the filing of a petition under any of the provisions of the\nfederal bankruptcy act or amendments thereto or the commencement of any\nproceeding under any foreign bankruptcy, insolvency, debtor relief or\nother similar statute or body of law, by or against a creditor;\n  (b) the making of an assignment by a creditor for the benefit of its\ncreditors;\n  (c) the application for the appointment, or the appointment, of any\nreceiver of, or of any of the property of a creditor;\n  (d) the issuance of any execution against any of the property of a\ncreditor;\n  (e) the issuance of a subpoena or order, in supplementary proceedings,\nagainst or with respect to any of the property of a creditor; or\n  (f) the issuance of a warrant of attachment against any of the\nproperty of a creditor,\nto set off and apply against any indebtedness, whether matured or\nunmatured, of such creditor to such debtor, any amount owing from such\ndebtor to such creditor, at or at any time after, the happening of any\nof the above mentioned events, and the aforesaid right of set off may be\nexercised by such debtor against such creditor or against any trustee in\nbankruptcy, debtor in possession, assignee for the benefit of creditors,\nreceiver or execution, judgment or attachment creditor of such creditor,\nor against anyone else claiming through or against such creditor or such\ntrustee in bankruptcy, debtor in possession, assignee for the benefit of\ncreditors, receivers, or execution, judgment or attachment creditor,\nnotwithstanding the fact that such right of set off shall not have been\nexercised by such debtor prior to the making, filing or issuance, or\nservice upon such debtor of, or of notice of, any such petition;\nassignment for the benefit of creditors; appointment or application for\nthe appointment of a receiver; or issuance of execution, subpoena or\norder or warrant.\n
N.Y. PBG Law § 649 — New York Code / Act PBG / Article 15 / Section 649
Severability
Status: in_force

§ 649. Severability. If any provision of this article or its\napplication to any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional or\ninvalid, in whole or in part, by any court, such holding of\nunconstitutionality or invalidity shall in no way affect or impair any\nother provision of this article or the application of any such provision\nto any other person or circumstance, and to this end the provisions of\nthis article are severable.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 8006 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 80 / Section 8006
Premiums on undertakings by fiduciaries
Status: in_force

§ 8006. Premiums on undertakings by fiduciaries. A receiver, assignee,\nguardian, trustee, committee, conservator or person appointed under\nsection one hundred eleven of the real property law or under section\ntwenty of the personal property law, required by law to give an\nundertaking as such, may include as a part of his necessary expenses\nsuch reasonable sum, not exceeding one per cent per annum upon the\namount of such undertaking paid his surety thereon, as the court\nappointing him shall allow.\n
N.Y. ABP Law § 212 — New York Code / Act ABP / Article 2 / Section 212
Escheated lands subject to trusts and incumbrances
Status: in_force

§ 212. Escheated lands subject to trusts and incumbrances. Lands\nescheated to the state shall be held subject to the same trusts and\nincumbrances to which they would have been subject if they had\ndescended, except that where the owner or beneficiaries of such trusts\nor the holders of such incumbrances have been made parties to an action\nbrought under section two hundred one, such land shall be subject only\nto trusts and incumbrances of record in the county in which the land is\nlocated prior to the filing of notice of pendency of action authorized\nunder section two hundred one.\n
N.Y. PBG Law § 614 — New York Code / Act PBG / Article 14-A / Section 614
Rent
Status: in_force

* § 614. Rent. 1. The rent for dwelling units for which a housing\nassistance payment contract is established under this article shall be\nreasonable in comparison with rents charged for comparable dwelling\nunits in the private, unassisted local market.\n  2. A housing access voucher local administrator (or other entity, as\nprovided in section six hundred sixteen of this article) may, at the\nrequest of an individual or family receiving assistance under this\narticle, assist that individual or family in negotiating a reasonable\nrent with a dwelling unit owner. A housing access voucher local\nadministrator (or other such entity) shall review the rent for a unit\nunder consideration by the individual or family (and all rent increases\nfor units under lease by the individual or family) to determine whether\nthe rent (or rent increase) requested by the owner is reasonable. If a\nhousing access voucher local administrator (or other such entity)\ndetermines that the rent (or rent increase) for a dwelling unit is not\nreasonable, the housing access voucher local administrator (or other\nsuch entity) shall not make housing assistance payments to the owner\nunder this subdivision with respect to that unit.\n  3. If a dwelling unit for which a housing assistance payment contract\nis established under this article is exempt from local rent control\nprovisions during the term of that contract, the rent for that unit\nshall be reasonable in comparison with other units in the rental area\nthat are exempt from local rent control provisions.\n  4. Each housing access voucher local administrator shall make timely\npayment of any amounts due to a dwelling unit owner under this section,\nsubject to appropriation of funds for this purpose.\n  * NB Expires May 1, 2030\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 342.1 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 3 / Part 4 / Section 342.1
The fact-finding hearing; order of procedure
Status: in_force

§ 342.1. The fact-finding hearing; order of procedure. The order of\nthe fact-finding hearing shall be as follows:\n  1. The court shall permit the parties to deliver opening addresses. If\nboth parties deliver opening addresses, the presentment agency's address\nshall be delivered first.\n  2. The presentment agency must offer evidence in support of the\npetition.\n  3. The respondent may offer evidence in his defense.\n  4. The presentment agency may offer evidence in rebuttal of the\nrespondent's evidence, and the respondent may then offer evidence in\nrebuttal of the presentment agency's evidence. The court may in its\ndiscretion permit the parties to offer further rebuttal or surrebuttal\nevidence in this pattern. In the interest of justice, the court may\npermit either party to offer evidence upon rebuttal which is not\ntechnically of a rebuttal nature but more properly a part of the\noffering party's original case.\n  5. At the conclusion of the evidence, the respondent shall have the\nright to deliver a summation.\n  6. The presentment agency shall then have the right to deliver a\nsummation.\n  7. The court must then consider the case and enter a finding.\n
N.Y. CAN Law § 96 — New York Code / Act CAN / Article 5 / Section 96
Fees
Status: in_force

§ 96. Fees. The board may charge licensees a reasonable license fee.\nSuch fee may be based on the activities permitted by the license, the\namount of cannabinoid hemp or hemp extract to be processed or extracted\nby the licensee, the gross annual receipts of the licensee for the\nprevious license period, or any other factors reasonably deemed\nappropriate by the board.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 870-J — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 27 / Section 870-J
Civil penalties
Status: in_force

§ 870-j. Civil penalties. 1. Any person who knowingly and willfully\noperates an amusement device, viewing stand or tent without any of the\nfollowing:\n  (a) the permit required by section eight hundred seventy-d of this\narticle; or\n  (b) the inspections required by section eight hundred seventy-e of\nthis article; or\n  (c) the insurance or other security required by section eight hundred\nseventy-f of this article shall be subject to a civil penalty of not\nless than two thousand dollars, nor more than four thousand dollars, for\neach day the violation continues.\n  2. Any person who operates an amusement device, viewing stand or tent\nwithout any of the following:\n  (a) the permit required by section eight hundred seventy-d of this\narticle; or\n  (b) the inspections required by section eight hundred seventy-e of\nthis article; or\n  (c) the insurance or other security required by section eight hundred\nseventy-f of this article shall be subject to a civil penalty of not\nless than two thousand dollars, nor more than four thousand dollars.\n  3. The commissioner, in assessing penalties under subdivision one of\nthis section, shall give due consideration to the appropriateness of the\npenalty with respect to the size of the owner's or lessee's business,\nthe good faith of the owner or lessee and his history of previous\nviolation.\n  4. Any operator of an amusement device who has been subject to a civil\npenalty imposed pursuant to this section relating to the operation of\nsuch amusement device on two or more occasions within any five year\nperiod of time shall not operate the amusement device in this state, and\nsuch device shall be taken out of service as soon as practicable. When\nan amusement device is taken out of service pursuant to this\nsubdivision, the operator of such device shall sign an affidavit, in a\nform approved by the commissioner, that the amusement device was taken\nout of service and will remain out of service until such time as the\ncommissioner determines that the amusement device meets all safety\nrequirements established pursuant to this article. Any operator of an\namusement device, which is sworn to have been taken out of service, who\noperates or allows to be operated such device, in violation of the\noperator's affidavit, shall be subject to a fine of ten thousand\ndollars.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 214-B — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 17 / Section 214-B
Regulations
Status: in_force

§ 214-b. Regulations.  The authority to promulgate regulations for the\nefficient enforcement of this article is hereby vested in the\ncommissioner.  This article and the regulations promulgated thereunder\nshall be so interpreted and construed, however, as to effectuate its\ngeneral purpose to enact state legislation uniform with the federal act\napproved June twenty-fifth, nineteen hundred thirty-eight, and all acts\namendatory thereof and supplemental thereto.\n  The commissioner is hereby authorized (1) to adopt, in so far as\npracticable, the regulations fixing and establishing definitions and\nstandards of identity and/or standards of quality, and tolerances, for\nfoods or food products from time to time promulgated under the federal\nact or acts, and (2) to change or amend the regulations promulgated\nunder this chapter fixing and establishing definitions and standards of\nidentity, and/or standards of quality, and tolerances, so as to conform\nin so far as practicable, to those promulgated under the federal act or\nacts.\n  The commissioner shall hold a public hearing upon a proposal to\npromulgate any new or amended regulations under this article, except in\nthe case of a proposal to adopt an applicable regulation promulgated\nunder the federal act or acts.\n
N.Y. SCP Law § 1101 — New York Code / Act SCP / Article 11 / Section 1101
Incumbents The office of public administrator within the counties of the city of New York hereby is continued
Status: in_force

§ 1101. Incumbents\n  The office of public administrator within the counties of the city of\nNew York hereby is continued.  The public administrators of the counties\nwithin the city of New York in office when this act takes effect shall\ncontinue in office until the end of their respective terms or until a\nvacancy occurs.\n
N.Y. CVR Law § 18-D — New York Code / Act CVR / Article 2-A / Section 18-D
Restraint of discrimination; damages for violations
Status: in_force

§ 18-d. Restraint of discrimination; damages for violations. 1.  Any\nperson aggrieved by a violation of section eighteen-c of this chapter\nand any person whose assessment shall amount to more than one thousand\ndollars and who shall be liable to pay taxes on such assessment in any\ncounty, town, village or municipal corporation in the state or who has\nbeen assessed or who has paid taxes upon any assessment of the\nabove-named amount within one year previous to the initiation of an\naction under this section shall have a right of action in any court of\nappropriate jurisdiction for restraint of such violation and for other\nequitable remedies including such affirmative relief as may be necessary\nto undo the effects of such violation.\n  2. Any person aggrieved by a violation of section eighteen-c of this\nchapter shall in addition have a right of action in any court of\nappropriate jurisdiction for damages caused by such violation.\n  3. At or before the commencement of any action under this section,\nnotice thereof shall be served upon the attorney general.\n
N.Y. PEP Law § 30 — New York Code / Act PEP / Article 3 / Section 30
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 30. Definitions. As used in this article, the term "transfer"\nincludes sale, assignment, conveyance, deed and gift, and the term\n"agreement" includes promise and undertaking.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 123-A — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 7 / Section 123-A
Exemption from civil liability
Status: in_force

§ 123-a. Exemption from civil liability. 1. If any dog shall, without\njustification, attack a person, or behaves in a manner which a\nreasonable person would believe poses a serious and unjustified imminent\nthreat of serious physical injury to a person, when such person is\npeaceably conducting himself in a place where he may lawfully be, such\nperson or any other person witnessing the attack or threatened attack\nmay destroy such dog while so attacking, and no liability in damages or\notherwise shall be incurred on account of such destruction.\n  2. If any dog shall, without justification, attack a companion animal,\nfarm animal or domestic animal, or shall behave in a manner which a\nreasonable person would believe poses a serious and unjustified imminent\nthreat of serious physical injury or death to a companion animal, farm\nanimal or domestic animal, where such animal is in any place where it\nmay lawfully be, the owner or caretaker of such animal, or any other\nperson witnessing the attack, may destroy such dog, and no liability in\ndamages or otherwise shall be incurred on account of such destruction.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 220.44 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title M / Article 220 / Section 220.44
Criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds
Status: in_force

§ 220.44 Criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school\n           grounds.\n  A person is guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or\nnear school grounds when he knowingly and unlawfully sells:\n  1. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one\nthrough six-a of section 220.34 of this article, when such sale takes\nplace upon school grounds or on a school bus; or\n  2. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one\nthrough eight of section 220.39 of this article, when such sale takes\nplace upon school grounds or on a school bus; or\n  3. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one\nthrough six of section 220.34 of this article, when such sale takes\nplace upon the grounds of a child day care or educational facility under\ncircumstances evincing knowledge by the defendant that such sale is\ntaking place upon such grounds; or\n  4. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one\nthrough eight of section 220.39 of this article, when such sale takes\nplace upon the grounds of a child day care or educational facility under\ncircumstances evincing knowledge by the defendant that such sale is\ntaking place upon such grounds.\n  5. For purposes of subdivisions three and four of this section, "the\ngrounds of a child day care or educational facility" means (a) in or on\nor within any building, structure, athletic playing field, a playground\nor land contained within the real property boundary line of a public or\nprivate child day care center as such term is defined in paragraph (c)\nof subdivision one of section three hundred ninety of the social\nservices law, or nursery, pre-kindergarten or kindergarten, or (b) any\narea accessible to the public located within one thousand feet of the\nreal property boundary line comprising any such facility or any parked\nautomobile or other parked vehicle located within one thousand feet of\nthe real property boundary line comprising any such facility. For the\npurposes of this section an "area accessible to the public" shall mean\nsidewalks, streets, parking lots, parks, playgrounds, stores and\nrestaurants.\n  6. For the purposes of this section, a rebuttable presumption shall be\nestablished that a person has knowledge that they are within the grounds\nof a child day care or educational facility when notice is conspicuously\nposted of the presence or proximity of such facility.\n  Criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds is a\nclass B felony.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 5909 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 59 / Section 5909
Restrictions on insurance obtained by purchasing groups
Status: in_force

§ 5909. Restrictions on insurance obtained by purchasing groups. (a) A\npurchasing group located in this state shall not purchase liability\ninsurance from a risk retention group not chartered in a state or from\nan insurer not authorized in this state, unless the purchase is effected\npursuant to section two thousand one hundred eighteen of this chapter\nthrough an excess line broker licensed pursuant to section two thousand\none hundred five of this chapter, except where otherwise permitted\npursuant to section two thousand one hundred seventeen of this chapter.\n  (b) The terms of any liability insurance policy issued or issued for\ndelivery in this state to a purchasing group or any of its members shall\nnot provide, or be construed to provide, insurance coverage prohibited\ngenerally by state statute or declared unlawful by the highest court of\nthe state whose law applies to such policy. If the law of this state\napplies to an insurance policy obtained by a purchasing group, the terms\nof that policy shall not provide or be construed to provide insurance\ncoverage prohibited generally by state statute or declared unlawful by\nthe highest court of this state which has construed such coverage.\n  (c) A purchasing group which obtains liability insurance from an\ninsurer not authorized in this state or a risk retention group shall\ninform each of the members of such group which have a risk resident or\nlocated in this state that such risk is not protected by an insurance\ninsolvency security fund in this state, and that such risk retention\ngroup or such insurer may not be subject to all insurance laws and\nregulations of this state.\n  (d) No liability insurance policy issued or issued for delivery in\nthis state to a purchasing group or a member of such group with a risk\nresident or located within this state shall provide for a deductible or\nself-insured retention shared among purchasing group members or\napplicable to the group itself.\n
N.Y. ACA Law § 8.03 — New York Code / Act ACA / Title B / Article 8 / Section 8.03
New York state writers' institute
Status: in_force

§ 8.03. New York state writers' institute. The New York state writers'\ninstitute is hereby established under the jurisdiction of the state\nuniversity of New York.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 2994-L — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 29-CC / Section 2994-L
Interinstitutional transfers
Status: in_force

§ 2994-l. Interinstitutional transfers. 1. If a patient with an order\nto withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment is transferred from a\nmental hygiene facility to a hospital or from a hospital to a different\nhospital, any such order or plan shall remain effective until an\nattending practitioner first examines the transferred patient, whereupon\nan attending practitioner must either:\n  (a) Issue appropriate orders to continue the prior order or plan. Such\norders may be issued without obtaining another consent to withhold or\nwithdraw life-sustaining treatment pursuant to this article; or\n  (b) Cancel such order, if the attending practitioner determines that\nthe order is no longer appropriate or authorized. Before canceling the\norder the attending practitioner shall make reasonable efforts to notify\nthe person who made the decision to withhold or withdraw treatment and\nthe hospital staff directly responsible for the patient's care of any\nsuch cancellation. If such notice cannot reasonably be made prior to\ncanceling the order or plan, the attending practitioner shall make such\nnotice as soon as reasonably practicable after cancellation.\n  2. Orders to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment shall\nremain effective and no affirmative action by a general hospital shall\nbe required pursuant to this section where a patient is transferred\nwithin a general hospital between a medical unit and a ward, wing, unit,\nor other part of the general hospital which is operated for the purpose\nof providing services for persons with mental illness pursuant to an\noperating certificate issued by the commissioner of mental health.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 202-C — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 7 / Section 202-C
Prevention of personal injuries in the use of ski tows, other passenger tramways and downhill ski areas
Status: in_force

§ 202-c. Prevention of personal injuries in the use of ski tows, other\npassenger tramways and downhill ski areas.  The commissioner may make\nrules, consistent with article eighteen of the general obligations law,\nguarding against personal injuries to employees and the public in the\nuse and operation of ski tows, other passenger tramways and downhill ski\nareas.\n