FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. PBO Law § 67 — New York Code / Act PBO / Article 4 / Section 67
Fees of public officers
Status: in_force

§ 67. Fees of public officers. 1. Each public officer upon whom a duty\nis expressly imposed by law, must execute the same without fee or\nreward, except where a fee or other compensation therefor is expressly\nallowed by law.\n  2. An officer or other person, to whom a fee or other compensation is\nallowed by law, for any service, shall not charge or receive a greater\nfee or reward, for that service, than is so allowed.\n  3. An officer, or other person, shall not demand or receive any fee or\ncompensation, allowed to him by law for any service, unless the service\nwas actually rendered by him; except that an officer may demand in\nadvance his fee, where he is, by law, expressly directed or permitted to\nrequire payment thereof, before rendering the service.\n  4. Money received by a public officer, or which shall come into his\npossession or custody, in the performance of his official duties or in\nconnection therewith or incidental thereto, shall be held by him in\ntrust for the person or persons entitled thereto or for the purposes\nprovided by law and all interest or increments which shall accrue or\nattach to such money while in his possession or custody shall be added\nto, and become a part of, the money so held and no part of such interest\nor increments shall be retained by such officer to his personal use or\nbenefit, except legal fees allowed by law for receiving and disbursing\nthe same, notwithstanding the provisions of any general or special law.\n  An officer or other person, who violates either of the provisions\ncontained in this section, is liable, in addition to the punishment\nprescribed by law for the criminal offense, to an action in behalf of\nthe person aggrieved, in which the plaintiff is entitled to treble\ndamages.\n
N.Y. SCC Law § 252 — New York Code / Act SCC / Article 17 / Section 252
Laws repealed
Status: in_force

§ 252. Laws repealed.  The following acts and parts of acts are hereby\nrepealed:\n  1. Of the laws enumerated in the schedule annexed, that portion\nthereof specified in the last column.\n  2. All acts or parts of acts and ordinances of the city, in so far as\ninconsistent with the provisions of this chapter.\n  Nothing herein contained, however, shall be deemed to repeal or in any\nwise affect the validity of the provisions of chapter five hundred and\nsixty of the laws of nineteen hundred and two; chapter three hundred and\nseventy-eight of the laws of nineteen hundred and three; chapters one\nhundred and seventeen, three hundred and ninety-four and five hundred\nand fifty-three of the laws of nineteen hundred and three; chapter three\nhundred and eighty of the laws of nineteen hundred and four; chapters\none hundred and eighteen, one hundred and ninety-one, two hundred and\ntwenty-three, five hundred and forty, five hundred and forty-one, five\nhundred and forty-three, six hundred and forty-five, six hundred and\nseventy-six and six hundred and eighty-six of the laws of nineteen\nhundred and five; but all of such acts are hereby continued in full\nforce and effect.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 392-A — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 26 / Section 392-A
Sale of new computers
Status: in_force

§ 392-a. Sale of new computers. 1. As used in this section, the\nfollowing terms have the following meanings:\n  (a) "Computer" means an electronic machine that performs high speed\nmathematical or logical calculations or that assembles, stores,\ncorrelates, or otherwise processes and outputs information derived from\ncoded data in accordance with a predetermined program;\n  (b) "Computer accessory" means keyboards, monitors, printers, mouses,\nor other hardware attachments to a computer; and\n  (c) "Consumer" means any purchaser of a computer or computer accessory\nprimarily for personal or home business use.\n  2. No person, firm, partnership, association, limited liability\ncompany, corporation, or other entity shall use remanufactured, rebuilt,\nor recycled parts in the manufacture for sale or distribution in this\nstate of a new computer or any new computer accessory to a consumer at\nretail, unless (1) such computer or computer accessory contains a clear\nand conspicuous label in accordance with subdivision three of this\nsection; or (2) the manufacturer otherwise provides to the consumer,\nprior to purchase, clear and conspicuous notice that the product\ncontains rebuilt, remanufactured or recycled components.\n  3. The label required pursuant to subdivision two of this section\nshall:  (a) indicate that such computer or computer accessory may\ncontain remanufactured, rebuilt, or recycled parts; and\n  (b) be displayed by sticker or tag affixed to the computer or computer\naccessory or its protective packaging or wrapping, or if such computer\nor computer accessory is in a box, such label shall be printed or\ndisplayed by sticker or tag affixed to the outside of such box.\n  4. Whenever there shall be a violation of this section, an application\nmay be made by the attorney general in the name of the people of the\nstate of New York to a court or justice having jurisdiction by a special\nproceeding to issue an injunction, and upon notice to the defendant of\nnot less than five days, to enjoin and restrain the continuance of such\nviolation; and if it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court or\njustice that the defendant has, in fact, violated this section, an\ninjunction may be issued by the court or justice, enjoining and\nrestraining any further violations, without requiring proof that any\nperson has, in fact, been injured or damaged thereby. In any such\nproceeding, the court may make allowances to the attorney general as\nprovided in paragraph six of subdivision (a) of section eighty-three\nhundred three of the civil practice law and rules, and direct\nrestitution. If the court in such a special proceeding determines that a\nviolation of this section has occurred, the court may impose a civil\npenalty of not more than five hundred dollars for each violation. In\nconnection with any such proposed application, the attorney general is\nauthorized to take proof and make a determination of the relevant facts\nand to issue subpoenas in accordance with the civil practice law and\nrules.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 903 — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 25 / Section 903
Interest and penalties
Status: in_force

§ 903. Interest and penalties. For the purposes of this article, the\nwords "tax" and "taxes" shall include interest and penalties due under\nany taxing statute, and liability for such interest or penalties or\nboth, due under a taxing statute of another state or a political\nsubdivision thereof, shall be recognized and enforced by the courts of\nthis state to the same extent that the laws of such other state permit\nthe enforcement in its courts of liability for such interest or\npenalties or both, due under a taxing statute of this state or a\npolitical subdivision thereof.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 141 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 5 / Section 141
Designation of supreme court justices to hold court in another county
Status: in_force

§ 141. Designation of supreme court justices to hold court in another\ncounty. At the request of the presiding justice of any judicial\ndepartment, the presiding justice of any of the other departments of the\nstate may consent to the assignment from among the trial justices of any\njudicial district in his department, of such justices as in his opinion\nmay be spared from said district, without prejudice to the work or\ninterests of such district, to hold trial or special terms in the\ndepartment from whence the request may come.\n  No consent shall be given hereunder to the assignment of a justice or\njustices from any district that will not leave at all times at least two\ntrial justices in such district; and no allowance given by any statute\nfor services, or expenses, rendered, or incurred by any trial justice\nfor sitting in the first or second departments shall be paid, unless\nassigned with such consent as hereinbefore provided.\n
N.Y. SCT Law § 7 — New York Code / Act SCT / Article 1 / Section 7
Certification of school districts
Status: in_force

§ 7. Certification of school districts. The board of assessors of each\ntown shall immediately upon completing and verifying the assessment roll\nin each year ascertain therefrom the total assessed valuation of the\ntaxable property within each school district appearing on the roll, and\non or before the first day of September in each year shall certify the\nsame to the respective boards of education or the trustees of each such\ndistrict.\n
N.Y. RPP Law § 10 — New York Code / Act RPP / Article 2 / Section 10
Capacity to hold real property
Status: in_force

§ 10. Capacity to hold real property. 1. A citizen of the United\nStates is capable of holding real property within this state, and of\ntaking the same by descent, devise or purchase.\n  2. Noncitizens are empowered to take, hold, transmit, and dispose of\nreal property within this state in the same manner as native-born\ncitizens and their heirs and devisees take in the same manner as\ncitizens.\n  3. For the purpose of maintaining offices and places of residence for\nits ambassadors and consular officers and for its representatives at the\nUnited Nations, a foreign government is empowered to hold, transmit and\ndispose of real property within this state. Title to such property may\nbe taken either in the name of the foreign government or in the name of\nits ambassador or consul or in the name of its minister to the United\nNations. If a conveyance of real property is made to an ambassador or\nconsul or minister of a foreign government as such, or contains\nappropriate words showing the intention to vest the title in the holder\nof the office rather than in the named individual, the title to the real\nproperty shall pass from time to time without any further conveyance to\nthe respective successors in such office, who shall have full power to\ndispose of such property.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 644 — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 23 / Section 644
Implementation
Status: in_force

§ 644. Implementation. The commissioner of the division of criminal\njustice services and the director of the office of victim services shall\nassist criminal justice agencies in implementing the guidelines\npromulgated by the commissioner.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 360.40 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title K / Article 360 / Section 360.40
Trial jury; conduct of jury trial in general
Status: in_force

§ 360.40  Trial jury; conduct of jury trial in general.\n  A jury trial of an information must be conducted generally in the same\nmanner as a jury trial of an indictment, and the rules governing\npreliminary instructions by the court, supervision of the jury, motion\npractice and other procedural matters involved in the conduct of a jury\ntrial of an indictment are, where appropriate, applicable to the conduct\nof a jury trial of an information.\n
N.Y. SCP Law § 1616 — New York Code / Act SCP / Article 16 / Section 1616
Application of article This article shall apply only to the wills and estates of non-domiciliaries
Status: in_force

§ 1616.  Application of article\n  This article shall apply only to the wills and estates of\nnon-domiciliaries.\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 326 — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 6-A / Section 326
New York state interoperable and emergency communication board
Status: in_force

§ 326. New York state interoperable and emergency communication board.\nThe "New York state interoperable and emergency communication board" is\nhereby established within the division of homeland security and\nemergency services. The board shall assist local governments, service\nsuppliers, wireless telephone service suppliers and appropriate state\nagencies by facilitating the most efficient and effective routing of 911\nemergency calls; developing minimum standards for public safety\nanswering points; promoting the exchange of information, including\nemerging technologies; and encouraging the use of best practice\nstandards among the public safety answering point community.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 21 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 2 / Section 21
Interference with department employees in performance of duties; bribery
Status: in_force

§ 21. Interference with department employees in performance of duties;\nbribery. No person shall attempt, by means of any threat or violence, to\ndeter or prevent an inspector, agent or other employee of the department\nfrom performing any duty imposed by law upon him or upon the department;\nnor shall any person give or offer a bribe or any valuable consideration\nto any inspector, agent or other employee of the department to influence\nhim in respect to any official act or duty.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 342-Z — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 342-Z
Portion of state highway system to be designated as "The Veterans of Foreign Wars Memorial Highway"
Status: in_force

* § 342-z. Portion of state highway system to be designated as "The\nVeterans of Foreign Wars Memorial Highway". All that portion of the\nstate highway system beginning at the Pennsylvania - New York line\ntravelling north on New York state route 11 to the Canada - New York\nline, excepting therefrom those portions of such route heretofore\ndesignated as the "Black River Trail" and the "Military Trail", shall be\ndesignated and known as "The Veterans of Foreign Wars Memorial Highway."\n  * NB There are 2 § 342-z's\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 9-703 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 9 / Part 7 / Section 9-703
Security Interest Perfected Before Effective Date
Status: in_force

Section 9--703. Security Interest Perfected Before Effective Date.\n  (a) Continuing priority over lien creditor: perfection requirements\nsatisfied. A security interest that is enforceable immediately before\nRevised Article 9 takes effect and would have priority over the rights\nof a person that becomes a lien creditor at that time is a perfected\nsecurity interest under Revised Article 9 if, when Revised Article 9\ntakes effect, the applicable requirements for enforceability and\nperfection under Revised Article 9 are satisfied without further action.\n  (b) Continuing priority over lien creditor: perfection requirements\nnot satisfied. Except as otherwise provided in Section 9--705 and\nsubsection (c), if, immediately before this article takes effect, a\nsecurity interest is enforceable and would have priority over the rights\nof a person that becomes a lien creditor at that time, but the\napplicable requirements for enforceability or perfection under this\narticle are not satisfied when this article takes effect, the security\ninterest:\n       (1) is a perfected security interest for one year after this\n           article takes effect;\n       (2) remains enforceable thereafter only if the security interest\n           becomes enforceable under Section 9--203 before the year\n           expires; and\n       (3) remains perfected thereafter only if the applicable\n           requirements for perfection under this article are satisfied\n           before the year expires.\n  (c) Special rule for cooperative interests: perfection requirements\nnot satisfied. If, immediately before Revised Article 9 takes effect, a\nsecurity interest in a cooperative interest is enforceable and would\nhave priority over the rights of a person that becomes a lien creditor\nat that time, but the applicable requirements for perfection under\nRevised Article 9 are not satisfied when Revised Article 9 takes effect,\nthe security interest:\n       (1) is a perfected security interest for 5 years after Revised\n           Article 9 takes effect; and\n       (2) remains perfected thereafter only if the applicable\n           requirements for perfection under Revised Article 9 are\n           satisfied before the 5 years expire.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 89-BBB — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 8-B / Section 89-BBB
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 89-bbb. Definitions. When used in this article, the following terms\nshall have the following meanings:\n  1. "Commissioner" means the commissioner of the division of criminal\njustice services.\n  2. "Division" means the division of criminal justice services.\n  3. "Secretary" means the secretary of state.\n  4. "Department" means the department of state.\n  6. "Armored car carrier" means any individual, partnership,\nassociation, limited liability company, corporation, or any other\nentity, engaging in the business of providing armored car services for\nhire.\n  7. "Armored car services" means engaging in the business of providing\nsecured transportation, protection and safeguarding of valuable cargo\nfrom one place or point to another, including the provision of cash\nservices for automated teller machines, by means of specially designed\nand constructed bullet-resistant armored vehicles and armored car\nguards.\n  8. "Armored car guard" has the meaning ascribed to that term by\nsubdivision eight of section eighty-nine-ppp of this chapter.\n  9. "Valuable cargo" means money, cash, currency, coin, bullion,\nprecious metals and articles made therefrom, gems and jewelry,\nnegotiable and non-negotiable securities, bonds, notes, checks, drafts,\ncoupons, or other valuable instruments, documents or certificates,\nincluding tapes, computer disks, or other electronic or magnetic media,\nU.S. Postage Stamps, food stamps, and other articles of unusual value.\n  10. "Licensee" means an armored car carrier that has been issued a\nlicense in accordance with the provisions of this article.\n  11. "Principal" means any person controlling an interest greater than\nten percent of an armored car carrier.\n  12. "Officer" means the four primary officers of a corporation,\nnormally defined as president, vice-president, secretary and treasurer.\n  13. "Serious offense" has the meaning ascribed to that term by\nsubdivision thirteen of section eighty-nine-f of this chapter.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 7515 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 75 / Section 7515
Mandatory arbitration clauses; prohibited
Status: in_force

§ 7515. Mandatory arbitration clauses; prohibited. (a) Definitions. As\nused in this section:\n  1. The term "employer" shall have the same meaning as provided in\nsubdivision five of section two hundred ninety-two of the executive law.\n  2. The term "prohibited clause" shall mean any clause or provision in\nany contract which requires as a condition of the enforcement of the\ncontract or obtaining remedies under the contract that the parties\nsubmit to mandatory arbitration to resolve any allegation or claim of\ndiscrimination, in violation of laws prohibiting discrimination,\nincluding but not limited to, article fifteen of the executive law.\n  3. The term "mandatory arbitration clause" shall mean a term or\nprovision contained in a written contract which requires the parties to\nsuch contract to submit any matter thereafter arising under such\ncontract to arbitration prior to the commencement of any legal action to\nenforce the provisions of such contract and which also further provides\nlanguage to the effect that the facts found or determination made by the\narbitrator or panel of arbitrators in its application to a party\nalleging discrimination, in violation of laws prohibiting\ndiscrimination, including but not limited to, article fifteen of the\nexecutive law shall be final and not subject to independent court\nreview.\n  4. The term "arbitration" shall mean the use of a decision making\nforum conducted by an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators within the\nmeaning and subject to the provisions of article seventy-five of the\ncivil practice law and rules.\n  (b) (i) Prohibition. Except where inconsistent with federal law, no\nwritten contract, entered into on or after the effective date of this\nsection shall contain a prohibited clause as defined in paragraph two of\nsubdivision (a) of this section.\n  (ii) Exceptions. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed\nto impair or prohibit an employer from incorporating a non-prohibited\nclause or other mandatory arbitration provision within such contract,\nthat the parties agree upon.\n  (iii) Mandatory arbitration clause null and void. Except where\ninconsistent with federal law, the provisions of such prohibited clause\nas defined in paragraph two of subdivision (a) of this section shall be\nnull and void. The inclusion of such clause in a written contract shall\nnot serve to impair the enforceability of any other provision of such\ncontract.\n  (c) Where there is a conflict between any collective bargaining\nagreement and this section, such agreement shall be controlling.\n
N.Y. RAT Law § 106 — New York Code / Act RAT / Article 9 / Section 106
Records; prima facie evidence
Status: in_force

§ 106. Records; prima facie evidence.  The record of the proceedings\nof the board of transportation, and the records and printed minutes of\nthe transit commission, of the former transit construction commissioner,\nof the former public service commission for the first district, and of\nthe former board of rapid transit railroad commissioners, transferred to\nthe board of transportation, or certified copies thereof when such\ncertified copies are authorized by this chapter to be delivered to the\nboard of transportation instead of originals, shall be prima facie\nevidence of the proceedings of the board of transportation, of the\ntransit commission, of the former transit construction commissioner, of\nthe former public service commission for the first district, or of the\nformer board of rapid transit railroad commissioners, as the case may\nbe, in respect to matters concerning which such records or minutes\nrelate. Certified copies of such records or papers shall in like manner\nconstitute prima facie evidence.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 854 — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 24-A / Section 854
Quarterly work opportunity tax credit reporting
Status: in_force

§ 854. Quarterly work opportunity tax credit reporting. The department\nshall make available on its website certain statistical information and\ntarget group eligibility information relating to work opportunity tax\ncredit certifications approved by the department made pursuant to the\nfederal Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (Pub. L. No.\n114-113)(PATH Act). The information relating to certifications issued by\nthe department that shall be disclosed includes the starting wage,\ntarget group, and position information as reported by employers to the\ndepartment on employer applications for certification pursuant to the\nPATH Act. No personally identifiable information, including information\nidentifying specific employers, shall be disclosed by the department.\nThe department shall make available the information required to be\ndisclosed by this section no later than ninety days after the effective\ndate of this section and shall update such information every three\nmonths thereafter.\n
N.Y. STF Law § 99-U — New York Code / Act STF / Article 6 / Section 99-U
New York state gaming commission account
Status: in_force

* § 99-u. New York state gaming commission account. 1. There is hereby\nestablished in the joint custody of the comptroller and the executive\ndirector of the New York state gaming commission an account in the\nmiscellaneous special revenue fund to be known as the "New York state\ngaming commission account".\n  2. Such account shall consist of moneys transferred thereto from the\nstate lottery fund administration account, the regulation of racing\naccount, the bell jar collection account or the regulation of Indian\ngaming account.\n  3. In no circumstance shall net proceeds of the lottery, including the\nproceeds from video lottery gaming, be used for the payment of\nnon-lottery expenses of the New York gaming commission, administrative\nor otherwise.\n  4. All moneys in the New York state gaming commission account shall be\navailable, subject to appropriation, for the payment of administrative\nexpenses of the New York state gaming commission.\n  * NB There are 2 § 99-u's\n