FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. FCT Law § 325.1 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 3 / Part 2 / Section 325.1
The probable-cause hearing; time
Status: in_force

§ 325.1. The probable-cause hearing; time. 1. At the initial\nappearance, if the respondent denies a charge contained in the petition\nand the court determines that the respondent shall be detained for more\nthan three days pending a fact-finding hearing, the court shall schedule\na probable-cause hearing to determine the issues specified in section\n325.3 of this part.\n  2. Such probable-cause hearing shall be held within three days\nfollowing the initial appearance or within four days following the\nfiling of a petition, whichever occurs sooner.\n  3. For good cause shown, the court may adjourn the hearing for no more\nthan an additional three court days.\n  4. The respondent may waive the probable-cause hearing, but the fact\nthat the respondent is not ready for a fact-finding hearing shall not be\ndeemed such a waiver.\n  5. Where the petition consists of an order of removal pursuant to\narticle seven hundred twenty-five of the criminal procedure law, unless\nthe removal was pursuant to subdivision three of section 725.05 of such\nlaw and the respondent was not afforded a probable cause hearing\npursuant to subdivision three of section 722.20 of such law, the\npetition shall be deemed to be based upon a determination that probable\ncause exists to believe the respondent is a juvenile delinquent and the\nrespondent shall not be entitled to any further inquiry on the subject\nof whether probable cause exists. After the filing of any such petition\nthe court must, however, exercise independent, de novo discretion with\nrespect to release or detention as set forth in section 320.5 of this\npart.\n
N.Y. PBS Law § 229 — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 11 / Section 229
Censorship prohibited
Status: in_force

§ 229. Censorship prohibited. 1. The commission may not prohibit or\nlimit any program or any class or type of program or otherwise censor\nthe communications or signals transmitted by any cable television\ncompany or over any cable television system, and may not promulgate any\nregulation or condition which would interfere with the right of free\nspeech by means of cable television.\n  2. No municipality may prohibit or limit any program or class or type\nof program or impose discriminatory or preferential franchise fees in\nany manner that would tend to encourage or discourage programming of any\nparticular nature, directly or indirectly.\n  3. No cable television company may prohibit or limit any program or\nclass or type of program presented over a leased channel or any channel\nmade available for public access or educational purposes.\n
N.Y. PBG Law § 556 — New York Code / Act PBG / Article 13 / Title 151 / Section 556
Village of Frankfort housing authority
Status: in_force

§ 556. Village of Frankfort housing authority.  A municipal housing\nauthority, to be known as the village of Frankfort housing authority, is\nhereby created and established for the village of Frankfort in the\ncounty of Herkimer for the accomplishment of any or all of the purposes\nspecified in article eighteen of the constitution of the state of New\nYork. It shall constitute a body corporate and politic, be perpetual in\nduration and consist of five members. It shall have the powers and\nduties now or hereafter conferred by this chapter upon municipal housing\nauthorities. It shall be organized in the manner prescribed by and\nsubject to the provisions of this chapter, and the authority, its\nmembers, officers and employees and its operations and activities shall\nin all respects be governed by the provisions of this chapter.\n
N.Y. PML Law § 1408 — New York Code / Act PML / Article 14 / Section 1408
Additional regulatory costs
Status: in_force

§ 1408. Additional regulatory costs. The commission may assess\nannually, in arrears, on each registrant proportional to the interactive\nfantasy sports gross revenue of such registrant in the preceding year\ncompared to the aggregate interactive fantasy sports gross revenue of\nall registrants in the preceding year actual costs necessary to regulate\nin accordance with the provisions of this article. Such assessments\nshall be made only within amounts appropriated therefor.\n
N.Y. MIL Law § 78 — New York Code / Act MIL / Article 3 / Section 78
Absence without leave; discharge
Status: in_force

§ 78. Absence without leave; discharge.  The governor may discharge\nany commissioned officer who absents himself without leave for three\nmonths.  Such officer shall receive a discharge in writing in such form\nand of such type or classification as may be prescribed by applicable\nlaws and regulations of the United States and by regulations issued\npursuant to this chapter.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 2803-W — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 28 / Section 2803-W
Independent quality monitors for residential health care facilities
Status: in_force

* § 2803-w. Independent quality monitors for residential health care\nfacilities. The department may require a residential health care\nfacility to contract with an independent quality monitor selected, and\non reasonable terms determined, by the department, pursuant to a\nselection process conducted notwithstanding sections one hundred twelve\nor one hundred sixty-three of the state finance law, for purposes of\nmonitoring the operator's compliance with a written and mandatory\ncorrective plan and reporting to the department on the implementation of\nsuch corrective action, when the department has determined in its\ndiscretion that operational deficiencies exist at such facility that\nshow:\n  1. a condition or conditions in substantial violation of the standards\nfor health, safety, or resident care established in law or regulation\nthat constitute a danger to resident health or safety;\n  2. a pattern or practice of habitual violation of the standards of\nhealth, safety, or resident care established in law or regulation; or\n  3. any other condition dangerous to resident life, health, or safety.\nSuch written mandatory corrective plans shall include caps on\nadministrative and general costs that are unrelated to providing direct\ncare (including providing at least minimum staffing levels as determined\nby the department) or care coordination.\n  * NB There are 2 § 2803-w's\n
N.Y. VIL Law § 14-1428 — New York Code / Act VIL / Article 14 / Section 14-1428
Expense of construction; how raised
Status: in_force

§ 14-1428 Expense of construction; how raised. The expense of\nconstructing a sewerage system may be raised in an entire amount or in\nsmaller sums from time to time as the board of sewer commissioners may\ndetermine. If such expense or any part thereof is to be assessed upon\nproperty benefited, the board may assess the same, or the instalment to\nbe raised, on the several benefited lots or parcels pursuant to the\nprovisions of article twenty-two of this chapter. Nothing contained in\nthis section shall be construed to prevent the financing of such\nexpense, in whole or in part, pursuant to the local finance law.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 96-Z-9 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 5-C / Section 96-Z-9
Criminal slaughter, processing or possession of inedible meat
Status: in_force

§ 96-z-9. Criminal slaughter, processing or possession of inedible\nmeat. A person is guilty of criminal slaughter, processing or possession\nof inedible meat when he knowingly and unlawfully (a) slaughters, for\nthe purpose of human consumption, any animal from which such meat would\nbe derived, (b) adds, mixes or otherwise combines any such meat with\nfood intended for human consumption, or bones, cuts, grinds or otherwise\nprocesses such meat for the purpose of human consumption, or (c)\npossesses such meat with intent to sell the meat for human consumption.\nCriminal slaughter, processing or possession of an inedible meat is a\nclass E felony.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 113 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 1 / Part 1 / Section 113
Establishment of court
Status: in_force

§ 113. Establishment of court. The family court of the state of New\nYork is established in each county of the state as part of the unified\ncourt system for the state.\n
N.Y. RPA Law § 969 — New York Code / Act RPA / Article 9 / Section 969
Shares of infant, incompetent or conservatee
Status: in_force

§ 969. Shares of infant, incompetent or conservatee. Where a party\nentitled to receive a portion of the proceeds of sale is an infant,\nincompetent or conservatee, such portion may be disposed of as follows:\n  1. The court may direct it to be invested in permanent securities in\nthe name and for the benefit of the infant, incompetent or conservatee,\nor it may direct it to be paid over to the general guardian of the\ninfant, committee of the incompetent or conservator of the conservatee,\nwhen the guardian, committee conservator shall have executed an\nundertaking to such infant, incompetent or conservatee; or,\n  2. Where a general guardian, committee or conservator has been\nappointed, upon proof that it will be for the best interest and\nadvantage of the estate of such infant, incompetent or conservatee\nperson, the court may authorize and direct such guardian, committee or\nconservator, in the name of such infant, incompetent person or\nconservatee, to make application for an award of a sum in gross as\nprovided in section 968; or,\n  3. If any of the moneys arising from the proceeds of such sale shall\nhave been paid to the county treasurer, and on due proof that such money\nhas remained uninvested in permanent securities for the space of three\nmonths, the court may direct the same to be paid to the general\nguardian, committee or conservator of such infant, incompetent or\nconservatee upon his giving an undertaking for the faithful execution of\nhis trust; where said sum in hands of county treasurer does not exceed\nthe sum of one thousand dollars the court may direct the same to be paid\nin accordance with subdivision five of this section; or,\n  4. In the case of an infant, incompetent or conservatee residing\nwithout the state and having in the state or country where he or she\nresides a general guardian, committee or conservator, or person duly\nappointed under the laws of such state or country to the control, and\nentitled by the laws of such state or country to the custody, of the\nmoney of such infant, incompetent or conservatee, the court, upon\nsatisfactory proof of such facts and of the sufficiency of the\nundertaking given by such general guardian, committee or conservator or\nperson in such state or country by the certificate of a judge of a court\nof record of such state or country, or otherwise, may direct that the\nportion of such infant, incompetent or conservatee arising upon such\nsale shall be paid over to such general guardian, committee or\nconservator or person; or,\n  5. If the portion of the proceeds arising upon such sale which belongs\nto an infant, incompetent or conservatee residing within or without the\nstate does not exceed one thousand dollars, the court may direct that\nthe same may be paid to his father, or to his mother or to some\ncompetent person with whom the infant, incompetent or conservatee\nresides, or who has some interest in his welfare, for the use and\nbenefit of such infant, incompetent or conservatee.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 399-EEE*2 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 26 / Section 399-EEE*2
Car wash promotion disclosure
Status: in_force

* § 399-eee. Car wash promotion disclosure. 1. For the purposes of\nthis section, the term "car wash" means any individual, partnership,\ncorporation, limited liability company, joint venture, association, or\nother business entity that engages in the cleaning of vehicles,\nincluding washing, detailing, drying, polishing, vacuuming or otherwise\nproviding cosmetic care to vehicles.\n  2. Car washes shall clearly state when a promotion will expire as well\nas any costs which will be incurred upon the expiration of such\npromotion and how often such costs will be incurred upon someone taking\npart in such promotion.\n  3. Car washes shall conspicuously post notice of such information on a\nboard or other visible place in view of consumers when advertising a\npromotion. If the car wash advertises such promotion online it shall\nalso post such notice within such advertisement, coupon or promotion\ninformation.\n  4. Any car wash which fails to comply with this section shall be\nassessed a civil penalty not to exceed five hundred dollars for each\nviolation.\n  * NB There are 2 § 399-eee's\n
N.Y. NAV Law § 195 — New York Code / Act NAV / Article 12 / Part 4 / Section 195
Construction
Status: in_force

§ 195. Construction. This article, being necessary for the general\nhealth, safety, and welfare of the people of this state, shall be\nliberally construed to effect its purposes.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 343-Z*9 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 343-Z*9
Portion of state highway system to be designated as the "FDNY Lt
Status: in_force

* § 343-z. Portion of state highway system to be designated as the\n"FDNY Lt. Richard Nappi Memorial Bridge". The bridge on Patchogue-Mount\nSinai Road also known as County Road 83 which crosses interstate route\n495 in the town of Brookhaven, county of Suffolk, shall be designated\nand known as the "FDNY Lt. Richard Nappi Memorial Bridge".\n  * NB There are 10 § 343-z's\n
N.Y. CCA Law § 404 — New York Code / Act CCA / Article 4 / Section 404
Summons; personal jurisdiction by acts of non-residents
Status: in_force

§ 404. Summons; personal jurisdiction by acts of non-residents. (a)\nActs which are the basis of jurisdiction. The court may exercise\npersonal jurisdiction over any non-resident of the city of New York, or\nhis executor or administrator, as to a cause of action arising from any\nof the acts enumerated in this section, in the same manner as if he were\na domiciliary of the state and a resident of the city of New York if, in\nperson or through an agent, he:\n  1. transacts any business within the city of New York or contracts\nanywhere to supply goods or services in the city of New York; or\n  2. commits a tortious act within the city of New York, except as to a\ncause of action for defamation of character arising from the act; or\n  3. owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the city\nof New York.\n  (b) Service of summons. Service of summons under this section may be\nmade in such manner and at such place, regardless of city or state\nlines, as would confer jurisdiction on supreme court in a like case.\n  (c) Effect of appearance. Where personal jurisdiction is based solely\nupon this section, an appearance does not confer such jurisdiction with\nrespect to causes of action not arising from an act enumerated in this\nsection.\n  (d) Corporation or association. If service of the summons cannot be\neffected by personal delivery thereof within the city of New York so as\nto acquire in personam jurisdiction of a corporation or unincorporated\nassociation, such corporation or association shall be deemed a\nnon-resident of the city of New York for purposes of this section.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 63-B — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 5 / Section 63-B
Action by attorney-general against usurper of office or franchise
Status: in_force

§ 63-b. Action by attorney-general against usurper of office or\nfranchise. 1. The attorney-general may maintain an action, upon his own\ninformation or upon the complaint of a private person, against a person\nwho usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises within the\nstate a franchise or a public office, civil or military, or an office in\na domestic corporation. The attorney-general may set forth in the\ncomplaint, in his discretion, the name of the person rightfully entitled\nto the office and facts showing his right thereto. Judgment may be\nrendered upon the right of the defendant and of the party so alleged to\nbe entitled, or only upon the right of the defendant, as justice\nrequires.  Where two or more persons claim to be entitled to the same\noffice or franchise, the attorney-general may bring the action against\nall to determine their respective rights thereto.\n  2. If the complaint sets forth the name of the person rightfully\nentitled to the office and the facts showing his right thereto, a\nprovisional order to arrest the defendant may be granted by the court if\nthe defendant by means of his usurpation or intrusion has received any\nfees or emoluments belonging to the office.\n  3. Where a defendant is adjudged to be guilty of usurping or intruding\ninto or unlawfully holding or exercising an office, franchise or\nprivilege, final judgment shall be rendered, ousting and excluding him\ntherefrom, and in favor of the state or the relator, as the case\nrequires, for the costs of the action. As a part of the final judgment\nin an action for usurping or intruding into or unlawfully holding or\nexercising an office, franchise or privilege, the court, in its\ndiscretion, also may award that the defendant, or, where there are two\nor more defendants, that one or more of them, pay to the state a fine\nnot exceeding two thousand dollars.  The judgment for the fine may be\ndocketed and execution may be issued thereupon in favor of the state, as\nif it had been rendered in an action to recover the fine.\n  4. Where final judgment has been rendered upon the right and in favor\nof the person alleged in the complaint to be entitled to an office, he\nmay recover, by action against the defendant, the damages which he has\nsustained in consequence of the defendant's usurpation, intrusion into,\nunlawful holding or exercise of the office.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 401 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 13 / Section 401
Sheriff must certify to court names of persons resisting execution of mandate
Status: in_force

§ 401. Sheriff must certify to court names of persons resisting\nexecution of mandate. The sheriff must certify to the court, from which\nor by whose authority the mandate was issued, the names of the\nresisters, their aiders and abettors, as far as he can ascertain the\nsame, to the end that they may be punished for their contempt of the\ncourt.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 19 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 2 / Section 19
Judge must not be interested in costs
Status: in_force

§ 19. Judge must not be interested in costs. A judge shall not,\ndirectly or indirectly, be interested in the costs of an action, claim,\nmatter, motion or proceeding, brought before him, or in a court of which\nhe is, or is entitled to act as a member, except an action, claim,\nmatter, motion or proceeding to which he is a party, or in which he is\ninterested.\n
N.Y. MHY Law § 81.42 — New York Code / Act MHY / Title E / Article 81 / Section 81.42
Compliance
Status: in_force

§ 81.42 Compliance.\n  (a) A motion to dismiss based on the alleged failure to comply with\nany of the provisions of this article, other than subparagraph (i) of\nparagraph one of subdivision (d) of section 81.07 of this article, must\nbe determined without regard to technical mistakes, deficiencies, and\nomissions that do not result in actual prejudice that affects the\nintegrity of the proceeding.\n  (b) A judgment or order made pursuant to this article, unless reversed\non appeal, releases the guardian and the sureties from all claims of the\nincapacitated person and/or any person affected thereby based on any act\nor omission directly authorized, approved or confirmed in the judgment\nor order. This section does not apply where the judgment or order is\nobtained by fraud or conspiracy or by misrepresentation contained in the\nnotice, petition, account, or in the judgment or order as to any\nmaterial fact. For purposes of this subdivision, misrepresentation of a\nmaterial fact includes but is not limited to the omission of a material\nfact.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 115.01 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title G / Article 115 / Section 115.01
Criminal facilitation in the third degree
Status: in_force

§ 115.01 Criminal facilitation in the third degree.\n  A person guilty of criminal facilitation in the third degree, when\nbelieving it probable that he is rendering aid to a person under sixteen\nyears of age who intends to engage in conduct that would constitute a\nfelony, he, being over eighteen years of age, engages in conduct which\nprovides such person with means or opportunity for the commission\nthereof and which in fact aids such person to commit a felony.\n  Criminal facilitation in the third degree is a class E felony.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 918 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 40 / Section 918
Airport transactions
Status: in_force

§ 918. Airport transactions. If an airport operator, including but not\nlimited to the public authority responsible for regulating commerce at\nsuch airport within this state, requests that a peer-to-peer car sharing\nprogram administrator enter into an airport concession agreement, such\npeer-to-peer car sharing program shall enter into a written agreement,\nwhere the peer-to-peer car sharing program administrator or shared\nvehicle owner uses the program to:\n  1. list vehicles parked on airport property or at airport facilities;\n  2. contract for transportation to or from airport property or airport\nfacilities;\n  3. facilitate the use of a shared vehicle to transport airport\npassengers on or off airport property; or\n  4. promote or market a shared vehicle to transport airport passengers\non or off airport property.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 1303 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 13 / Section 1303
Jury trial; how obtained; jury fee
Status: in_force

§ 1303. Jury trial; how obtained; jury fee.\n  (a) Either party after joinder of issue may demand a trial by jury.\nThe demand must be made in writing and must be filed with the clerk with\nthe notice of trial set forth in § 1301. Any other party to the action\nwithin ten days after the service of a copy of the notice of trial upon\nhim unaccompanied by a written notice demanding a trial by jury, may\nserve upon the attorneys for all the other parties to the action a\nwritten notice demanding a jury trial and file a copy of such notice\nwith the clerk within three days after service thereof. In a summary\nproceeding to recover possession of real property, the demand may be\nmade by the tenant at the time of answering or by the landlord at any\ntime before the day of trial.\n  (b) Unless a demand is made and the jury fee paid as provided in\nsection nineteen hundred eleven of this act, a jury trial is waived.\n  (c) The court may relieve a party from the effect of failing to comply\nwith this section if no undue prejudice to the rights of another party\nwould result.\n