FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. MDW Law § 278 — New York Code / Act MDW / Article 7-B / Section 278
Application of other provisions
Status: in_force

§ 278. Application of other provisions. 1. The provisions of this\narticle apply to buildings with residential, mixed or joint living-work\nquarters or artists' occupancy as herein provided and to such buildings\nonly. In addition to the provisions of this article, the following\nenumerated articles and sections of this chapter shall, to the extent\nrequired therein, apply to such buildings:\n  Article  1.        Introductory provisions: definitions\n           2.        Miscellaneous application provisions except sub-\n                     division two of section nine\n           8.        Requirements and remedies\n           9.        Registry of names and service of papers\n           10.       Prostitution\n           11.       Laws repealed; saving clause; effect\n  Section  28.       Two or more buildings on same lot\n           29.       Painting of courts and shafts\n           31.       Size of rooms, subdivision six only\n           37.       Artificial hall lighting\n           53.       Fire-escapes\n           55.       Wainscoting, subdivision two only\n           56.       Frame buildings and extensions\n           57.       Bells; mail receptacles\n           58.       Incombustible materials\n           59.       Bakeries and fat boiling\n           60.       Motor vehicle storage\n           61.       Business uses (except paragraph c of subdivision\n                     one and subdivision three)\n           62.       Parapets, guard railings and wires\n  2. Failure to comply with any provision of this chapter other than\nthis article and the above enumerated articles and sections shall not be\ngrounds for refusal of a certificate of occupancy or compliance.\n
N.Y. BSC Law § 105 — New York Code / Act BSC / Article 1 / Section 105
Certificates; corrections
Status: in_force

§ 105. Certificates; corrections.\n  Any certificate or other instrument relating to a domestic or foreign\ncorporation filed by the department of state under this chapter may be\ncorrected with respect to any informality or error apparent on the face,\nincorrect statement or defect in the execution thereof including the\ndeletion of any matter not permitted to be stated therein. A\ncertificate, entitled "Certificate of correction of............ (correct\ntitle of certificate and name of corporation)" shall be signed and\ndelivered to the department of state. It shall set forth the name of the\ncorporation, the date the certificate to be corrected was filed by the\ndepartment of state, a statement as to the nature of the informality,\nerror, incorrect statement or defect, the provision in the certificate\nas corrected or eliminated and if the execution was defective, the\nproper execution. The filing of the certificate by the department of\nstate shall not alter the effective time of the instrument being\ncorrected, which shall remain as its original effective time, and shall\nnot affect any right or liability accrued or incurred before such\nfiling. A corporate name may not be changed or corrected under this\nsection. The provisions of this section shall apply to all instruments\nand certificates heretofore and hereafter filed with the department of\nstate.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 1066 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 10 / Part 6 / Section 1066
Successive motions
Status: in_force

§ 1066. Successive motions. If a motion under section one thousand\nsixty-two of this part is denied, it may not be renewed for a period of\nninety days after the denial, unless the order of denial permits renewal\nat an earlier time.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 534-U — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 19-I / Section 534-U
Revocation of licenses and registrations
Status: in_force

§ 534-u. Revocation of licenses and registrations. In addition to the\ngrounds elsewhere set forth in this article, any license or registration\nissued or made pursuant thereto may be revoked or suspended for such\nperiod as the commission deems in the public interest or the licensee or\nregistrant may be reprimanded, for:\n  1. Conviction of any crime or offense in relation to gambling if the\ncrime or offense was committed at or on a pier or other waterfront\nterminal or within five hundred feet thereof;\n  2. Willful commission of, or willful attempt to commit at or on a\nwaterfront terminal or adjacent highway, any act of physical injury to\nany other person or of willful damage to or misappropriation of any\nother person's property, unless justified or excused by law;\n  3. Receipt or solicitation of anything of value from any person other\nthan a licensee's or registrant's employer as consideration for the\nselection or retention for employment of such licensee or registrant;\n  4. Coercion of a licensee or registrant to make purchases from or to\nutilize the services of any person;\n  5. Refusal to answer any material question or produce any evidence\nlawfully required to be answered or produced at any investigation,\ninterview or other proceeding conducted by the commission pursuant to\nthe provisions of this act, or, if such refusal is accompanied by a\nvalid plea of privilege against self-incrimination, refusal to obey an\norder to answer such question or produce such evidence made by the\ncommission pursuant to the provisions of subdivision one of section five\nhundred thirty-four-v of this article;\n  6. Association with a person who has been identified by a federal,\nstate, or local law enforcement agency as a member or associate of an\norganized crime group, a terrorist group, or a career offender cartel,\nor who is a career offender, under circumstances where such association\ncreates a reasonable belief that the participation of the licensee or\nregistrant in any activity required to be licensed under this act would\nbe inimical to the policies of this article, provided however that\nassociation without the requisite showing of inimicality as set forth\nherein shall be insufficient grounds for revocation; or\n  7. Conviction of a racketeering activity or knowing association with a\nperson who has been convicted of a racketeering activity by a court of\nthe United States or any state or territory thereof under circumstances\nwhere such association creates a reasonable belief that the\nparticipation of the licensee or registrant in any activity required to\nbe licensed under this act would be inimical to the policies of this\narticle, provided, however, that association without the requisite\nshowing of inimicality as set forth herein shall be insufficient grounds\nfor revocation.\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 7417 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 74 / Section 7417
Commencement of a proceeding
Status: in_force

§ 7417. Commencement of a proceeding. The superintendent represented\nby the attorney general shall commence any proceeding under this article\nby an application to the supreme court, in the judicial district in\nwhich the principal office of the insurer is located, for an order\ndirecting such insurer to show cause why the superintendent should not\nhave the requested relief. On the return of such order, and after a full\nhearing, which shall be held without delay, such court shall either deny\nthe application or grant it together with such other relief as the\nnature of the case and the interests of policyholders, creditors,\nshareholders, members, or the public may require.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 4406-G — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 44 / Section 4406-G
Telehealth delivery of services
Status: in_force

§ 4406-g. Telehealth delivery of services. 1. A health maintenance\norganization shall not exclude from coverage a service that is otherwise\ncovered under an enrollee contract of a health maintenance organization\nbecause the service is delivered via telehealth, as that term is defined\nin subdivision two of this section; provided, however, that a health\nmaintenance organization may exclude from coverage a service by a health\ncare provider where the provider is not otherwise covered under the\nenrollee contract. A health maintenance organization may subject the\ncoverage of a service delivered via telehealth to co-payments,\ncoinsurance or deductibles provided that they are at least as favorable\nto the enrollee as those established for the same service when not\ndelivered via telehealth. A health maintenance organization may subject\nthe coverage of a service delivered via telehealth to reasonable\nutilization management and quality assurance requirements that are\nconsistent with those established for the same service when not\ndelivered via telehealth.\n  2. For purposes of this section, "telehealth" means the use of\nelectronic information and communication technologies by a health care\nprovider to deliver health care services to an enrollee while such\nenrollee is located at a site that is different from the site where the\nhealth care provider is located.\n  * 3. A health maintenance organization that provides comprehensive\ncoverage for hospital, medical or surgical care shall reimburse covered\nservices delivered via telehealth on the same basis, at the same rate,\nand to the extent that such services are reimbursed when delivered in\nperson; provided that reimbursement of covered services delivered by\nmeans of telehealth shall not require reimbursement of costs not\nactually incurred in the provision of the telehealth services, including\ncharges related to the use of a clinic or other facility when neither\nthe originating site nor the distant site occur within the clinic or\nother facility. The commissioner, in consultation with the\nsuperintendent, may promulgate regulations to implement the provisions\nof this section.\n  * NB Repealed April 1, 2028\n  * 4. A health maintenance organization that provides comprehensive\ncoverage for hospital, medical, or surgical care with a network of\nhealth care providers shall ensure that such network is adequate to meet\nthe telehealth needs of insured individuals for services covered under\nthe policy when medically appropriate.\n  * NB Repealed April 1, 2028\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 118 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 9-A / Section 118
Issuance of order or other instrument securing passage by vessel from foreign port to this state; what to contain
Status: in_force

§ 118. Issuance of order or other instrument securing passage by\nvessel from foreign port to this state; what to contain.  No person\nagreeing to furnish or secure for any other person, for a consideration,\npassage by vessel from any foreign port to any port in this state shall\nissue any advice, order, certificate or other instrument purporting to\nentitle one or more persons to a passage ticket or other evidence of a\nright of passage, unless every such advise, order, certificate or\ninstrument shall be signed or countersigned by a duly appointed agent as\nprovided in section one hundred seventeen, of the vessel or line over\nwhich said advice, order, certificate or other instrument is held out to\nbe good to secure such passage ticket or other evidence of a right of\npassage. Every such order, advice, certificate or other instrument and\nevery receipt for money paid for or on account of any such advice,\norder, certificate or other instrument, shall contain a statement of the\namount paid or to be paid for such passage; the name, address and age of\nthe person for whom intended; the name of the company or line, if any,\nto which the vessel on which passage is to be made belongs; the place\nfrom which such passage is to commence; the place where such passage is\nto terminate; the name of the person purchasing such advice, order,\ncertificate or other instrument, and such advice, order, certificate or\nother instrument must be signed by the person who issues it.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 76 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 4 / Section 76
Appellate division may compel sheriff to attend to room in which court is held
Status: in_force

§ 76. Appellate division may compel sheriff to attend to room in which\ncourt is held. The appellate division of the supreme court may enforce\nthe performance of the duty by the sheriff of causing the room in which\na term of the appellate division is held, to be properly heated,\nventilated, lighted, and kept comfortably clean and in order.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 208-H — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 10 / Section 208-H
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and retraining for police departments in cities having a population of one million or more 1
Status: in_force

§ 208-h. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and retraining for\npolice departments in cities having a population of one million or more\n1. For the purposes of this section, "cardiopulmonary resuscitation"\nshall have the same meaning as provided in subdivision six of section\nsix hundred twenty-one of the general business law.\n  2. Every police department in a city having a population of one\nmillion or more shall provide all uniformed personnel of such department\ntraining in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and direct that such training\nbe completed at least every two years to the extent practicable, but no\nlater than every four years.\n
N.Y. MIL Law § 44 — New York Code / Act MIL / Article 2 / Section 44
The New York guard
Status: in_force

§ 44. The New York guard.  The New York guard, whenever a state force\nshall be duly organized under the constitution and laws of the United\nStates and of the state, shall be a reserve land force of the organized\nmilitia, and shall be commanded by a general officer.\n
N.Y. UDA Law § 29 — New York Code / Act UDA / Section 29
Assistance by state officers, departments, boards and commissions
Status: in_force

§ 29. Assistance by state officers, departments, boards and\ncommissions. (1) The department of audit and control, department of law,\nand all other state agencies may render such services to the corporation\nwithin their respective functions as may be requested by the\ncorporation.\n  (2) Upon request of the corporation, any state agency is hereby\nauthorized and empowered to transfer to the corporation such officers\nand employees as it may deem necessary from time to time to assist the\ncorporation in carrying out its functions and duties under this act.\nOfficers and employees so transferred shall not lose their civil service\nstatus or rights.\n  (3) In order most effectively to carry out its corporate purposes, the\ncorporation shall assist and cooperate with the corporation for urban\ndevelopment and research of New York, created by the New York state\nurban development and research act.\n
N.Y. PVH Law § 31-C — New York Code / Act PVH / Article 2 / Section 31-C
Tenant-cooperators; application of shares
Status: in_force

§ 31-c. Tenant-cooperators; application of shares. 1. No mutual\ncompany shall require a current tenant-cooperator to use cash, loan or\nmortgage to make an initial payment for shares that would entitle the\ntenant-cooperator to occupancy upon transfer to another dwelling unit\nwithin the mutual company's facilities, but instead, subject to\nsubdivision two of this section, shall first allow the tenant-cooperator\nthe option to apply the value of his or her shares and equity in the\nmutual company toward any consideration required to be paid for such\nshares.\n  2. Within one hundred eighty days of the effective date of this\nsection, the commissioner and the supervising agency, as the case may\nbe, shall each promulgate regulations authorizing a current\ntenant-cooperator, entitled to occupancy by reason of ownership of\nshares in such mutual company, to apply all or a portion of the value of\nhis or her shares and equity in the mutual company toward any\nconsideration required to be paid for shares which would entitle the\ntenant-cooperator to occupancy of another unit owned and operated by the\nmutual company, regardless of the sale of the tenant-cooperator's\ncurrent shares in such mutual company, but subject to such other charges\ndue and owing to the mutual company for which such tenant-cooperator may\nbe liable. Any dispute thereof may be determined by a court of\nappropriate jurisdiction and any requirement to waive such right as a\ncondition of ownership or transfer shall be void as against public\npolicy.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 350.20 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title K / Article 350 / Section 350.20
Trial by judicial hearing officer
Status: in_force

§ 350.20 Trial by judicial hearing officer.\n  1. Notwithstanding any provision of section 350.10 of this article, in\nany case where a single judge trial of an information in a local\ncriminal court is authorized or required, the court may, upon agreement\nof the parties, assign a judicial hearing officer to conduct the trial.\nWhere such assignment is made, the judicial hearing officer shall\nentertain the case in the same manner as a court and shall:\n  (a) determine all questions of law;\n  (b) act as the exclusive trier of all issues of fact; and\n  (c) render a verdict.\n  2. In the discharge of this responsibility, the judicial hearing\nofficer shall have the same powers as a judge of the court in which the\nproceeding is pending. The rules of evidence shall be applicable at a\ntrial conducted by a judicial hearing officer.\n  3. Any action taken by a judicial hearing officer in the conduct of a\ntrial shall be deemed the action of the court in which the proceeding is\npending.\n  4. This section shall not apply where the single judge trial is of an\ninformation at least one count of which charges a class A misdemeanor.\n  5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one of this section,\nfor all proceedings before the district court of Nassau county the\nadministrative judge of Nassau county may, and for all proceedings\nbefore the district court of Suffolk county, the administrative judge of\nSuffolk county may, without the consent of the parties, assign matters\ninvolving traffic and parking infractions except those described in\nparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of subdivision two of section\nthree hundred seventy-one of the general municipal law to a judicial\nhearing officer in accordance with the provisions of section sixteen\nhundred ninety of the vehicle and traffic law and for all proceedings\nbefore the Buffalo city court the administrative judge of the eighth\njudicial district may, without the consent of the parties, assign\nmatters involving traffic infractions except those described in\nparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of subdivision two-a of\nsection three hundred seventy-one of the general municipal law to a\njudicial hearing officer in accordance with the provisions of section\nsixteen hundred ninety of the vehicle and traffic law and for all\nproceedings before the Rochester city court the administrative judge of\nthe seventh judicial district may, without the consent of the parties,\nassign matters involving traffic infractions except those described in\nparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of subdivision two-b of\nsection three hundred seventy-one of the general municipal law to a\njudicial hearing officer in accordance with the provisions of section\nsixteen hundred ninety of the vehicle and traffic law.\n
N.Y. PVH Law § 651 — New York Code / Act PVH / Article 12 / Section 651
Statement of legislative findings and purpose
Status: in_force

§ 651. Statement of legislative findings and purpose. 1. There\ncontinues to exist in the city of New York a seriously inadequate supply\nof safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations within the financial reach\nof families and persons of low income. The ordinary operations of\nprivate enterprise cannot provide an adequate supply of such\naccommodations at rentals and carrying charges which families and\npersons of low income can afford. In order to encourage the investment\nof private capital and provide such dwelling accommodations, provision\nshould be made for mortgage loans at low interest rates to housing\ncompanies which, subject to regulation as to rents, profits, dividends\nand disposition of their property, supply multiple dwelling\naccommodations, and other facilities incidental or appurtenant thereto,\nto such families and persons. For that purpose there should be created a\ncorporate governmental agency, to be known as the "New York city housing\ndevelopment corporation," which, through the issuance of its bonds,\nnotes or other obligations to the private investing public, may attract\na broad base of investment by the greatest number of the general public\nand obtain the funds necessary to make or finance the making of such\nmortgage loans.\n  2. There also exists in the city of New York a large number of\nmultiple dwellings which are inadequate, unsafe or insanitary and which\ncan be made adequate, safe and sanitary by rehabilitation or other\nimprovement. Such rehabilitation or improvement cannot readily be\nprovided by the ordinary operations of private enterprise without public\naid in the form of low interest loans to the owners of such multiple\ndwellings. In order to encourage the investment of private capital in\nsuch rehabilitation and improvement, the agency should also be\nempowered, through the issuance of its bonds, notes or other obligations\nto the private investing public, to obtain the funds necessary to make\nor finance the making of such low interest loans.\n  The necessity in the public interest for the provisions hereinafter\nenacted is hereby declared as a matter of legislative determination.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 4605-A — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 46 / Section 4605-A
Certificate of authority; authority to offer continuing care at home contracts
Status: in_force

§ 4605-a. Certificate of authority; authority to offer continuing care\nat home contracts. A continuing care retirement community may offer\ncontinuing care at home contracts upon approval by the commissioner to\namend the continuing care retirement community's certificate of\nauthority. In order to qualify for an amendment to its certificate of\nauthority, the continuing care retirement community shall submit to the\ncommissioner the following:\n  1. a business plan to the commissioner and the superintendent that\nincludes the following:\n  (a) a description of the continuing care at home services that will be\nprovided, the market that will be served by the continuing care at home\ncontracts, and the fees to be charged to prospective continuing care at\nhome contract holders;\n  (b) a copy of the proposed continuing care at home contract; and\n  (c) an actuarial study prepared by an independent actuary in\naccordance with standards adopted by the American Academy of Actuaries\ndemonstrating the impact that the continuing care at home contracts will\nhave on the overall operations of the continuing care retirement\ncommunity and further demonstrating that the addition of continuing care\nat home contracts will not jeopardize the financial solvency of the\ncontinuing care retirement community.\n  2. a market feasibility study demonstrating to the commissioner and\nthe superintendent sufficient consumer interest in continuing care at\nhome contracts and further demonstrating that the addition of continuing\ncare at home contracts will not have an adverse impact on the provision\nof services to continuing care retirement contract holders.\n  3. materials that meet all requirements established by the New York\nstate department of financial services.\n  4. a copy of the notification sent to continuing care retirement\ncontract holders describing the anticipated impact of the addition of\ncontinuing care at home contracts on continuing care retirement\ncommunity resources and proof that such notification has been\ndistributed to all continuing care retirement contract holders.\n