FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. PEN Law § 405.14 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 4 / Title W / Article 405 / Section 405.14
Unpermitted use of indoor pyrotechnics in the first degree
Status: in_force

§ 405.14 Unpermitted use of indoor pyrotechnics in the first degree.\n  A person is guilty of unpermitted use of indoor pyrotechnics in the\nfirst degree when he or she commits the crime of unpermitted use of\nindoor pyrotechnics in the second degree, as defined in section 405.12\nof this article, and, within the previous five year period, he or she\nhas been convicted one or more times of the crime of unpermitted use of\nindoor pyrotechnics in the second degree, as defined in section 405.12\nof this article, or unpermitted use of indoor pyrotechnics in the first\ndegree, as defined in this section.\n  Unpermitted use of indoor pyrotechnics in the first degree is a class\nE felony.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 7-202 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 7 / Part 2 / Section 7-202
Form of Warehouse Receipt; Effect of Omission
Status: in_force

Section 7--202. Form of Warehouse Receipt; Effect of Omission.\n  (a) A warehouse receipt need not be in any particular form.\n  (b) Unless a warehouse receipt provides for each of the following, the\nwarehouse is liable for damages caused to a person injured by its\nomission:\n  (1) a statement of the location of the warehouse facility where the\ngoods are stored;\n  (2) the date of issue of the receipt;\n  (3) the unique identification code of the receipt;\n  (4) a statement whether the goods received will be delivered to the\nbearer, to a named person, or to a named person or its order;\n  (5) the rate of storage and handling charges, unless goods are stored\nunder a field warehousing arrangement, in which case a statement of that\nfact is sufficient on a nonnegotiable receipt;\n  (6) a description of the goods or the packages containing them;\n  (7) the signature of the warehouse or its agent;\n  (8) if the receipt is issued for goods that the warehouse owns, either\nsolely, jointly, or in common with others, a statement of the fact of\nthat ownership; and\n  (9) a statement of the amount of advances made and of liabilities\nincurred for which the warehouse claims a lien or security interest,\nunless the precise amount of advances made or liabilities incurred, at\nthe time of the issue of the receipt, is unknown to the warehouse or to\nits agent that issued the receipt, in which case a statement of the fact\nthat advances have been made or liabilities incurred and the purpose of\nthe advances or liabilities is sufficient.\n  (c) A warehouse may insert in its receipt any terms that are not\ncontrary to this Act and do not impair its obligation of delivery under\nSection 7--403 or its duty of care under Section 7--204. Any contrary\nprovision is ineffective.\n
N.Y. SOS Law § 20-B — New York Code / Act SOS / Article 2 / Section 20-B
Plan for in-home care of senior citizens
Status: in_force

§ 20-b.  Plan for in-home care of senior citizens.  On or before the\nfirst day of April, nineteen hundred eighty-two the New York state\ncouncil for home care services, in consultation with the commissioner of\nsocial services and the office for the aging, shall prepare a plan\ndesigned to ease the burden of families providing care for elderly\nparents in the home of the parents or the homes of their families.\nRecommendations are to be made concerning, but not limited to, tax\nexemptions and increased availability of supportive services.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 344-M*5 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 344-M*5
Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the "Trooper Joseph Gallagher Memorial Bridge"
Status: in_force

* § 344-m. Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the\n"Trooper Joseph Gallagher Memorial Bridge". The bridge on interstate\nroute ninety, crossing over state route sixteen in the town of West\nSeneca, county of Erie, shall be designated and known as the "Trooper\nJoseph Gallagher Memorial Bridge".\n  * NB There are 23 § 344-m's\n
N.Y. VET Law § 42 — New York Code / Act VET / Article 3 / Section 42
Opportunities for certified service-disabled veteran-owned business enterprises
Status: in_force

§ 42. Opportunities for certified service-disabled veteran-owned\nbusiness enterprises. 1. The director, or in the absence of the\ndirector, the commissioner, within ninety days of the effective date of\nthis article shall promulgate rules and regulations for the following\npurposes:\n  (a) provide measures and procedures to ensure that certified\nservice-disabled veteran-owned business enterprises are afforded the\nopportunity for meaningful participation in the performance of state\ncontracts and to assist in state agencies' identification of those state\ncontracts for which certified service-disabled veteran-owned business\nenterprises may best perform;\n  (b) provide for measures and procedures that assist state agencies in\nthe identification of state contracts where service-disabled veteran\ncontract goals are practical, feasible and appropriate for the purpose\nof increasing the utilization of service-disabled veteran-owned business\nenterprise participation on state contracts;\n  (c) achieve a statewide goal for participation on state contracts by\nservice-disabled veteran-owned business enterprises of six percent;\n  (d) provide for procedures relating to submission and receipt of\napplications by service-disabled veteran-owned business enterprises for\ncertification;\n  (e) provide for the monitoring and compliance of state contracts by\nstate agencies with respect to the provisions of this article;\n  (f) provide for the requirement that state agencies submit regular\nreports, as determined by the director, with respect to their\nservice-disabled veteran-owned business enterprise program activity,\nincluding but not limited to, utilization reporting and state contract\nmonitoring and compliance;\n  (g) notwithstanding any provision of the state finance law, the public\nbuildings law, the highway law, the transportation law or the public\nauthorities law to the contrary, provide for the reservation or\nset-aside of certain procurements by state agencies in order to achieve\nthe objectives of this article; provided, however, that such\nprocurements shall remain subject to (i) priority of preferred sources\npursuant to sections one hundred sixty-two and one hundred sixty-three\nof the state finance law; (ii) the approval of the comptroller of the\nstate of New York pursuant to section one hundred twelve and section one\nhundred sixty-three of the state finance law and section twenty-eight\nhundred seventy-nine-a of the public authorities law; and (iii) the\nprocurement record requirements pursuant to paragraph g of subdivision\nnine of section one hundred sixty-three of the state finance law; and\n  (h) provide for any other purposes to effectuate this article.\n  2. State agencies shall administer the rules and regulations\npromulgated by the director for the implementation of this article.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 1166 — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 28-A / Section 1166
Transitional provisions
Status: in_force

§ 1166. Transitional provisions. With respect to the tax imposed under\nsection eleven hundred sixty of this article effective June first,\nnineteen hundred ninety, the provisions of subdivision (a) of section\neleven hundred six of this chapter shall apply, except that for the\npurposes of this section, all references in said subdivision (a) of such\nsection eleven hundred six to August first, nineteen hundred sixty-five,\nshall be read as referring to the effective date of such section eleven\nhundred sixty, and all references in said subdivision (a) of such\nsection eleven hundred six to April first, nineteen hundred sixty-five\nshall be read as referring to the date four months prior to the\neffective date of such section eleven hundred sixty. Nothing herein\ncontained shall be deemed to change the taxable status of any sale or\nuse which occurred prior to such effective date, and provided further\nthat the reference in subdivision one of section eleven hundred eighteen\nof this chapter to August first, nineteen hundred sixty-five, shall be\nread as referring to the effective date of section eleven hundred sixty\nof this article.\n
N.Y. RPA Law § 1201 — New York Code / Act RPA / Article 12 / Section 1201
Action by joint tenant or tenant in common; may maintain action against co-tenant
Status: in_force

§ 1201. Action by joint tenant or tenant in common; may maintain\naction against co-tenant.  A joint tenant or a tenant in common of real\nproperty, or his executor or administrator, may maintain an action to\nrecover his just proportion against his co-tenant who has received more\nthan his own just proportion, or against his executor or administrator.\n
N.Y. BVO Law § 6 — New York Code / Act BVO / Article 2 / Section 6
Reorganization
Status: in_force

§ 6. Reorganization. Any such lodge, chapter, commandery, consistory,\ncouncil, temple or post heretofore incorporated by the laws of this\nstate, or thereby heretofore enabled to take and hold real or personal\nproperty, or both, may surrender its act of incorporation, charter or\nprivilege so conferred upon it, and may become enabled to take and hold\nreal or personal property, or both, under the provisions of this\nchapter, on making and filing a certificate in the manner specified in\nthis chapter, and stating therein, in addition to what is required in\nsuch a certificate, the surrender of such act of incorporation, charter\nor privilege, specifying the same. The property theretofore held and\npossessed by it shall be fully vested in its trustees, who shall have\nall the rights, powers and privileges, and be subject to all the\nprovisions of this chapter.\n
N.Y. TWN Law § 302 — New York Code / Act TWN / Article 18 / Section 302
Division fence on change of title
Status: in_force

§ 302. Division fence on change of title. Whenever a subdivision or\nnew apportionment of any division fence shall become necessary by reason\nof transfer of the title of either of the adjoining owners, to the whole\nor any portion of the adjoining lands, by conveyance, devise or descent,\nsuch subdivision or new apportionment shall thereupon be made by the\nadjoining owners affected thereby; and either adjoining owner shall\nrefund to the other a just proportion of the value at the time of such\ntransfer of title of any division fence that shall theretofore have been\nmade and maintained by such other adjoining owner, or the person from\nwhom he derived his title, or he shall build his proportion of such\ndivision fence. The value of any fence, and the proportion thereof to be\npaid by any person, and the proportion to be built by him, shall be\ndetermined by any two of the fence viewers of the town, in case of\ndisagreement.\n
N.Y. PVH Law § 666 — New York Code / Act PVH / Article 12 / Section 666
Moneys of the corporation
Status: in_force

§ 666. Moneys of the corporation. 1. All moneys of the corporation,\nexcept as otherwise authorized or provided in this article, shall be\ndeposited as soon as practicable in a separate account or accounts in\nbanks or trust companies organized under the laws of the state or\nnational banking association doing business in the city. The moneys in\nsuch accounts shall be paid out on checks signed by such officer or\nemployee of the corporation as the corporation shall authorize. All\ndeposits of such moneys shall, if required by the corporation, be\nsecured by obligations of the United States or of the state or of the\ncity of a market value equal at all times to the amount of the deposit\nand all banks and trust companies are authorized to give such security\nfor such deposits.\n  Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the corporation shall\nhave power to contract with the holders of any of its notes or bonds as\nto the custody, collection, securing, investment and payment of any\nmoneys of the corporation and of any moneys held in trust or otherwise\nfor the payment of notes or bonds, and to carry out such contract.\nMoneys held in trust or otherwise for the payment of notes or bonds or\nin any way to secure notes or bonds and deposits of such moneys may be\nsecured in the same manner as moneys of the corporation, and all banks\nand trust companies are authorized to give such security for such\ndeposits.\n  2. Subject to the provisions of any contract with noteholders and\nbondholders and the approval of the comptroller, the corporation shall\nprescribe a system of accounts.\n  3. The comptroller, or his legally authorized representative, is\nhereby authorized and empowered from time to time to examine the books\nand accounts of the corporation including its receipts, disbursements,\ncontracts, reserve funds, sinking funds, investments, and any other\nmatters relating to its financial standing. Such an examination shall be\nconducted by the comptroller at least once in every five years; the\ncomptroller is authorized, however, to accept from the corporation, in\nlieu of such an examination, an external examination of its books and\naccounts made at the request of the corporation.\n  4. The corporation shall submit to the mayor and the comptroller\nwithin thirty days of the receipt thereof by the corporation a copy of\nthe report of every external examination of the books and accounts of\nthe corporation other than copies of the reports of such examinations\nmade by the comptroller.\n
N.Y. RRD Law § 141 — New York Code / Act RRD / Article 4 / Section 141
Mergers and consolidations of certain railroad corporations
Status: in_force

§ 141. Mergers and consolidations of certain railroad corporations.\nWith the consent and approval of the commissioner of transportation\npursuant to section one hundred eighty-eight of the transportation law,\na railroad corporation all of whose outstanding shares of each class are\nowned by a corporation, domestic or foreign, which has as its purpose or\namong its purposes a purpose for which a corporation may be formed under\nthe business corporation law, may merge into or consolidate with such\nowning corporation, following the procedure and with the effect set out\nin article nine of the business corporation law; provided, however, that\nupon such merger or consolidation the surviving or consolidated\ncorporation, if a domestic corporation, shall not possess any of the\nrights, privileges, immunities, powers and purposes of such railroad\ncorporation which could not be lawfully possessed by a corporation\nformed under the business corporation law.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 130.30 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title H / Article 130 / Section 130.30
Rape in the second degree
Status: in_force

§ 130.30 Rape in the second degree.\n  A person is guilty of rape in the second degree when:\n  1. being eighteen years old or more, he or she engages in vaginal\nsexual contact with another person less than fifteen years old;\n  2. being eighteen years old or more, he or she engages in oral sexual\ncontact with another person less than fifteen years old;\n  3. being eighteen years old or more, he or she engages in anal sexual\ncontact with another person less than fifteen years old;\n  4. he or she engages in vaginal sexual contact with another person who\nis incapable of consent by reason of being mentally disabled or mentally\nincapacitated;\n  5. he or she engages in oral sexual contact with another person who is\nincapable of consent by reason of being mentally disabled or mentally\nincapacitated; or\n  6. he or she engages in anal sexual contact with another person who is\nincapable of consent by reason of being mentally disabled or mentally\nincapacitated.\n  It shall be an affirmative defense to the crime of rape in the second\ndegree as defined in subdivisions one, two and three of this section\nthat the defendant was less than four years older than the victim at the\ntime of the act.\n  Rape in the second degree is a class D felony.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 7-301 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 7 / Part 3 / Section 7-301
Liability for Nonreceipt or Misdescription; "Said to Contain"; "Shipper's Weight, Load, and Count"; Improper Handling
Status: in_force

Section 7--301. Liability for Nonreceipt or Misdescription; "Said to\n                  Contain"; "Shipper's Weight, Load, and Count";\n                  Improper Handling.\n  (a) A consignee of a nonnegotiable bill of lading which has given\nvalue in good faith, or a holder to which a negotiable bill has been\nduly negotiated, relying upon the description of the goods in the bill\nor upon the date shown in the bill, may recover from the issuer damages\ncaused by the misdating of the bill or the nonreceipt or misdescription\nof the goods, except to the extent that the bill indicates that the\nissuer does not know whether any part or all of the goods in fact were\nreceived or conform to the description, such as in a case in which the\ndescription is in terms of marks or labels or kind, quantity, or\ncondition or the receipt or description is qualified by "contents or\ncondition of contents of packages unknown", "said to contain",\n"shipper's weight, load, and count," or words of similar import, if that\nindication is true.\n  (b) If goods are loaded by the issuer of a bill of lading:\n  (1) the issuer shall count the packages of goods if shipped in\npackages and ascertain the kind and quantity if shipped in bulk; and\n  (2) words such as "shipper's weight, load, and count," or words of\nsimilar import indicating that the description was made by the shipper\nare ineffective except as to goods concealed in packages.\n  (c) If bulk goods are loaded by a shipper that makes available to the\nissuer of a bill of lading adequate facilities for weighing those goods,\nthe issuer shall ascertain the kind and quantity within a reasonable\ntime after receiving the shipper's request in a record to do so. In that\ncase, "shipper's weight" or words of similar import are ineffective.\n  (d) The issuer of a bill of lading, by including in the bill the words\n"shipper's weight, load, and count," or words of similar import, may\nindicate that the goods were loaded by the shipper, and, if that\nstatement is true, the issuer is not liable for damages caused by the\nimproper loading. However, omission of such words does not imply\nliability for damages caused by improper loading.\n  (e) A shipper guarantees to an issuer the accuracy at the time of\nshipment of the description, marks, labels, number, kind, quantity,\ncondition, and weight, as furnished by the shipper, and the shipper\nshall indemnify the issuer against damage caused by inaccuracies in\nthose particulars. This right of indemnity does not limit the issuer's\nresponsibility or liability under the contract of carriage to any person\nother than the shipper.\n
N.Y. COR Law § 132 — New York Code / Act COR / Article 6 / Section 132
Retaking of an escaped incarcerated individual
Status: in_force

§ 132. Retaking of an escaped incarcerated individual. If an\nincarcerated individual escapes from a correctional facility, he or she\nmay be arrested and returned by the superintendent or by an officer or\nemployee of the department or by any peace officer, acting pursuant to\nhis or her special duties, or police officer without a warrant; or a\nmagistrate may cause such escaped incarcerated individual to be arrested\nand held in custody until he or she can be removed to a correctional\nfacility, as in the case of a commitment. Rewards for the taking of such\nescaped incarcerated individuals may be provided for by the rules of the\ndepartment.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 344-M*10 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 344-M*10
Portion of the state highway system to be designated and known as the "State Trooper Donald A
Status: in_force

* § 344-m. Portion of the state highway system to be designated and\nknown as the "State Trooper Donald A. Strand Memorial Bridge". All that\nportion of the state highway system constituting the Sunrise Highway\nPeconic overpass on route 27, in the town of Southampton, county of\nSuffolk, shall be known as the "State Trooper Donald A. Strand Memorial\nBridge".\n  * NB There are 23 § 344-m's\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 221-B — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 8 / Section 221-B
Issue of permits
Status: in_force

§ 221-b. Issue of permits. 1. An application for a permit shall be\nmade to the commissioner upon blanks furnished by him, and shall state\nunder oath:\n  a. Name of owner or lessee of the property.\n  b. A list of the provisions and clothing it is intended to sell.\n  c. The maximum number of boarders or lodgers it is intended to\naccommodate.\n  2. With the application there shall be presented to the commissioner\nproof of the applicant's citizenship and moral character, and if a\ncorporation, similar proof concerning its officers.\n  3. The applicant shall pay to the commissioner a permit fee of fifty\ndollars.\n  4. On approval of the application, the commissioner shall issue a\npermit only for the place designated in the application, and shall not\nbe transferable. The commissioner may revoke the permit on notice and\nfor cause shown.\n  5. Every operator of such a store or camp shall keep prominently\nposted in a conspicuous place on the premises a statement printed in the\nEnglish language and in the language understood by the majority of the\npatrons, specifying the rate of charges by the day and week for lodging,\nmeals, clothing and provisions supplied, and a copy thereof shall be\nfiled with the commissioner.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 92 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 9 / Section 92
Erroneous bills of lading or receipts, issued in good faith, excepted
Status: in_force

§ 92. Erroneous bills of lading or receipts, issued in good faith,\nexcepted. No person can be convicted of an offense under the last two\nsections, for the reason that the contents of any barrel, box, case,\ncask or other vessel or package mentioned in the bill of lading, receipt\nor other voucher did not correspond with the description given in such\ninstrument of merchandise received, if such description corresponds\nsubstantially with the marks, labels or brands upon the outside of such\nvessel or package, unless it appears that the defendant knew that such\nmarks, labels or brands were untrue.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 250.25 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title N / Article 250 / Section 250.25
Tampering with private communications
Status: in_force

§ 250.25 Tampering with private communications.\n  A person is guilty of tampering with private communications when:\n  1. Knowing that he does not have the consent of the sender or\nreceiver, he opens or reads a sealed letter or other sealed private\ncommunication; or\n  2. Knowing that a sealed letter or other sealed private communication\nhas been opened or read in violation of subdivision one of this section,\nhe divulges without the consent of the sender or receiver, the contents\nof such letter or communication, in whole or in part, or a resume of any\nportion of the contents thereof; or\n  3. Knowing that he does not have the consent of the sender or\nreceiver, he obtains or attempts to obtain from an employee, officer or\nrepresentative of a telephone or telegraph corporation, by connivance,\ndeception, intimidation or in any other manner, information with respect\nto the contents or nature thereof of a telephonic or telegraphic\ncommunication; except that the provisions of this subdivision do not\napply to a law enforcement officer who obtains information from a\ntelephone or telegraph corporation pursuant to section 250.35; or\n  4. Knowing that he does not have the consent of the sender or\nreceiver, and being an employee, officer or representative of a\ntelephone or telegraph corporation, he knowingly divulges to another\nperson the contents or nature thereof of a telephonic or telegraphic\ncommunication; except that the provisions of this subdivision do not\napply to such person when he acts pursuant to section 250.35.\n  Tampering with private communications is a class B misdemeanor.\n