FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. JUD Law § 101 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 4 / Section 101
Power of justices of appellate division of second department to appoint clerical and other personnel of the appellate term
Status: in_force

§ 101. Power of justices of appellate division of second department to\nappoint clerical and other personnel of the appellate term. The justices\nof the appellate division of the supreme court in the second department,\nor a majority of them, are authorized to appoint in their discretion,\nand to remove at pleasure, for the appellate term of the supreme court\nin the second department, a chief clerk, one deputy clerk, one assistant\ndeputy clerk, and all necessary other assistants and personnel in said\ncourt, and to prescribe the duties and fix the salaries thereof. Except\nas provided in the state finance law, such salaries and all other\nnecessary expenses of such appellate term, shall be paid by the state\ncomptroller out of moneys appropriated therefor by law.  The state\ndepartment of taxation and finance shall pay such salaries in equal\nbiweekly installments and shall apportion the total amount of such\nsalaries and expenses among the counties comprising the second judicial\ndepartment. Such counties shall reimburse the state for such salaries\nand expenses. The time and method of such reimbursement shall be as\nspecified in section seventy-four of this chapter.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 89-P — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 7-A / Section 89-P
Violations and penalties
Status: in_force

§ 89-p. Violations and penalties. Any person who is employed as a\nsecurity guard or who acts as a security guard in violation of the\nprovisions of section eighty-nine-g of this article or who knowingly and\nwilfully makes material misstatements in the application for or renewal\nof his or her registration card or who permits or authorizes the\nemployment of a person as a security guard in violation of the\nprovisions of section eighty-nine-g of this article or any security\nguard company which employs a security guard in violation of the\nprovisions of section eighty-nine-g of this article shall be guilty of a\nmisdemeanor which, upon conviction, shall be punishable by a term of\nimprisonment not to exceed six months, or by a fine of not more than one\nthousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment upon the first\nconviction and by a term of imprisonment not to exceed one year or by a\nfine of not less than one thousand dollars and not to exceed two\nthousand five hundred dollars or by both such fine and imprisonment upon\na subsequent conviction. Any person who shall knowingly and wilfully\nfail to surrender his or her registration card as required by\nsubdivision seven of section eighty-nine-l of this article shall be\nguilty of a violation punishable by a fine not to exceed two hundred\nfifty dollars in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law. Each\nviolation of this article shall be deemed a separate offense.\n
N.Y. PML Law § 131 — New York Code / Act PML / Article 1 / Section 131
Gaming inspector general; functions and duties
Status: in_force

§ 131. Gaming inspector general; functions and duties. The gaming\ninspector general shall have the following duties and responsibilities:\n  1. receive and investigate complaints from any source, or upon his or\nher own initiative, concerning allegations of corruption, fraud,\ncriminal activity, conflicts of interest or abuse in the commission;\n  2. determine with respect to such allegations whether disciplinary\naction, civil or criminal prosecution, or further investigation by an\nappropriate federal, state or local agency is warranted, and to assist\nin such investigations;\n  3. prepare and release to the public written reports of such\ninvestigations, as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law,\nsubject to redaction to protect the confidentiality of witnesses. The\nrelease of all or portions of such reports may be deferred to protect\nthe confidentiality of ongoing investigations;\n  4. review and examine periodically the policies and procedures of the\ncommission with regard to the prevention and detection of corruption,\nfraud, criminal activity, conflicts of interest or abuse;\n  5. recommend remedial action to prevent or eliminate corruption,\nfraud, criminal activity, conflicts of interest or abuse in the\ncommission;\n  6. establish programs for training commission officers and employees\nin regard to the prevention and elimination of corruption, fraud,\ncriminal activity, conflicts of interest or abuse in the commission; and\n  7. make an annual report to the governor, the comptroller and the\nlegislature concerning its work during the preceding year. Such report\nshall include but not be limited to the number of cases investigated,\nand the number of complaints received. Such initial report shall be due\nno later than the first day of April two thousand twenty-two, and then\nby the first day of April each year thereafter. Such report shall be\nmade public and published on the website of the office of the state\ninspector general and on the website of the commission.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 4016 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 40 / Section 4016
Opening and closing statements
Status: in_force

Rule 4016. Opening and closing statements. (a) Before any evidence is\noffered, an attorney for each plaintiff having a separate right, and an\nattorney for each defendant having a separate right, may make an opening\nstatement. At the close of all the evidence on the issues tried, an\nattorney for each such party may make a closing statement in inverse\norder to opening statements.\n  (b) In any action to recover damages for personal injuries or wrongful\ndeath, the attorney for a party shall be permitted to make reference,\nduring closing statement, to a specific dollar amount that the attorney\nbelieves to be appropriate compensation for any element of damage that\nis sought to be recovered in the action. In the event that an attorney\nmakes such a reference in an action being tried by a jury, the court\nshall, upon the request of any party, during the court's instructions to\nthe jury at the conclusion of all closing statements, instruct the jury\nthat:\n  (1) the attorney's reference to such specific dollar amount is\npermitted as argument;\n  (2) the attorney's reference to a specific dollar amount is not\nevidence and should not be considered by the jury as evidence; and\n  (3) the determination of damages is solely for the jury to decide.\n
N.Y. PBB Law § 144 — New York Code / Act PBB / Article 5 / Section 144
Lactation room in public buildings
Status: in_force

§ 144. Lactation room in public buildings. 1. As used in this section:\n  (a) "covered public building" means a public building owned by the\nstate of New York, under the supervision and control of the commissioner\nof general services, that is determined by said commissioner to be open\nto the public; and\n  (b) "lactation room" means a hygienic place, other than a bathroom,\nthat:\n  (1) is shielded from view;\n  (2) is free from intrusion;\n  (3) contains a chair, a working surface, and, if the public building\nis otherwise supplied with electricity, an electrical outlet; and\n  (4) is intended to be used for the primary purpose of breastfeeding or\nexpressing breast milk.\n  2. A covered public building shall contain a lactation room that is\nmade available for use by a member of the public to breastfeed or\nexpress breast milk.\n  3. A covered public building shall be excluded from the requirement of\nsubdivision two of this section if:\n  (a) the public building does not have a room that could be repurposed\nas a lactation room or a space that could be made private, at a\nreasonable cost; or\n  (b) new construction would be required to create a lactation room in\nthe public building and the cost of such construction is unfeasible.\n  4. Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize an\nindividual to enter a public building that the individual is not\notherwise authorized to enter.\n
N.Y. MHY Law § 81.11 — New York Code / Act MHY / Title E / Article 81 / Section 81.11
Hearing
Status: in_force

§ 81.11 Hearing.\n  (a) A determination that the appointment of a guardian is necessary\nfor a person alleged to be incapacitated shall be made only after a\nhearing.\n  (b) In a proceeding brought pursuant to this article any party to the\nproceeding shall have the right to:\n  1. present evidence;\n  2. call witnesses, including expert witnesses;\n  3. cross examine witnesses, including witnesses called by the court;\n  4. be represented by counsel of his or her choice.\n  (c) The hearing must be conducted in the presence of the person\nalleged to be incapacitated, either at the courthouse or where the\nperson alleged to be incapacitated resides, so as to permit the court to\nobtain its own impression of the person's capacity. If the person\nalleged to be incapacitated physically cannot come or be brought to the\ncourthouse, the hearing must be conducted where the person alleged to be\nincapacitated resides unless:\n  1. the person is not present in the state; or\n  2. all the information before the court clearly establishes that (i)\nthe person alleged to be incapacitated is completely unable to\nparticipate in the hearing or (ii) no meaningful participation will\nresult from the person's presence at the hearing.\n  (d) If the hearing is conducted without the presence of the person\nalleged to be incapacitated and the court appoints a guardian, the order\nof appointment shall set forth the factual basis for conducting the\nhearing without the presence of the person for whom the appointment is\nmade.\n  (e) If the hearing is conducted in the presence of the person alleged\nto be incapacitated and the person is not represented by counsel, the\ncourt shall explain to that person, on the record, the purpose and\npossible consequences of the proceeding, the right to be represented by\ncounsel and the fact that the court will appoint an attorney to\nrepresent the person alleged to be incapacitated if the person wishes to\nbe represented by counsel, and shall inquire of the person whether he or\nshe wishes to have an attorney appointed. If the person refuses the\nassistance of counsel, the court may nevertheless appoint counsel if the\ncourt is not satisfied that the person is capable of making an informed\ndecision regarding the appointment of counsel.\n  (f) If on or before the return date designated in the order to show\ncause the alleged incapacitated person or counsel for the alleged\nincapacitated person raises issues of fact regarding the need for an\nappointment under this article and demands a jury trial of such issues,\nthe court shall order a trial by jury thereof. Failure to make such a\ndemand shall be deemed a waiver of the right to trial by jury.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 392-H — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 26 / Section 392-H
Trash receptacles; dumpsters
Status: in_force

§ 392-h. Trash receptacles; dumpsters. No person or entity in\npossession of a trash or refuse receptacle commonly referred to as a\ndumpster or carting unit, having a capacity of more than twenty-five\ncubic yards, shall allow or cause the same to be or remain unattended on\na public street, highway or sidewalk unless such receptacle shall have a\nclearly visible fluorescent stripe or marking, at least six inches wide,\nwhich stripe or marking may be broken or segmented, located around the\nentire outside perimeter thereof. Failure to comply with the provisions\nhereof shall subject such person or entity to a civil penalty of\ntwenty-five dollars per day, per unit, for each day such failure shall\noccur. The provisions of this section shall supercede any inconsistent\nprovision of any other general, special or local law to the contrary.\n
N.Y. ENV Law § 47-0101 — New York Code / Act ENV / Article 47 / Section 47-0101
Short title
Status: in_force

§ 47-0101. Short title.\n  This article shall be known as the local environmental protection act.\n
N.Y. DCD Law § 31 — New York Code / Act DCD / Article 2-A / Section 31
Secured creditor's claim to disclose security
Status: in_force

§ 31. Secured creditor's claim to disclose security. In a liquidation\nproceeding every secured creditor's claim against the general assets\nshall disclose the nature of the security. When in an equity\nreceivership it is determined that the subject under receivership is\ninsolvent, secured creditors having claims on file which do not comply\nwith this section shall make disclosure within a time to be fixed by the\ncourt.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 3112 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 31 / Section 3112
Errors in notice for taking depositions
Status: in_force

Rule 3112. Errors in notice for taking depositions.  All errors and\nirregularities in the notice for taking a deposition are waived unless\nat least three days before the time for taking the deposition written\nobjection is served upon the party giving the notice.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 2607 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 26 / Section 2607
Payment of property paid into court
Status: in_force

Rule 2607. Payment of property paid into court. No property paid into\ncourt, or income from such property, shall be paid out except upon order\nof the court directing payment to a specified person, except that if the\nproperty so paid into court, or the income from such property, inclusive\nof interest, does not exceed fifty dollars, a county treasurer may pay\nthe same, without a court order, to the person entitled thereto or his\nauthorized attorney. When the whole or remaining balance of all payments\nof money into court in an action, or the whole or remaining balance of a\ndistributive share thereof, or any security or other property, is\ndirected to be paid out of court, the order must direct the payment of\nall accrued income belonging to the party to whom such money or\ndistributive share or remaining balance thereof, or security or other\nproperty is paid. A certified copy of the order directing payment shall\nbe delivered to the county treasurer or other custodian of the property.\nThe custodian, in the case of money, shall draw a draft payable to the\norder of the party entitled thereto specifying the title of the cause or\nmatter on account of which the draft is made and the date of the order\nauthorizing the draft. A certified copy of the order, accompanied by a\ndraft in the case of money, shall be delivered to the depository of the\nproperty before it shall pay out any property. If an order directs that\nperiodic payments be made, the filing of one copy of the order shall be\nsufficient to authorize the payment of subsequent drafts in pursuance\nthereof. Any other provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, if\nan order directing payment by the county treasurer is made by the court,\nthe copy of the order to be delivered to the county treasurer and the\ndepository as herein provided shall be certified by the clerk of the\ncourt to be a true copy of the original of such order on file in his\noffice.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 910 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 9 / Section 910
Simplified procedure for court determination of disputes; action without pleadings
Status: in_force

§ 910. Simplified procedure for court determination of disputes;\naction without pleadings. The simplified procedure for court\ndetermination of disputes set forth in CPLR §§ 3031, 3035 and 3037, and\nrules 3032 and 3036, shall apply in this court insofar as they may be\napplicable and the relief demanded is within the jurisdiction of this\ncourt.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 561 — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 15-A / Section 561
Exemption from taxation of bonds
Status: in_force

§ 561. Exemption from taxation of bonds.  Bonds, mortgages, notes and\nother obligations of an agency are declared to be issued for a public\npurpose and to be public instrumentalities and together with interest\nthereon, shall be exempt from taxation.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 353 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 9 / Section 353
Limitation on licensee's charges on certain loans
Status: in_force

§ 353. Limitation on licensee's charges on certain loans. No licensee\nshall directly or indirectly charge, contract for, or receive any\ninterest, discount, or consideration upon the loan, use, or forbearance\nof money, goods, or things in action, or upon the loan, use, or sale of\ncredit, of the amount or value of more than the maximum amounts\nprescribed in section three hundred forty of this article greater than\nthe rate permitted by section 5-501 of the general obligations law. The\nforegoing prohibition shall also apply to any licensee which permits any\nperson, as borrower or as endorser, guarantor, or surety for any\nborrower or otherwise, to owe directly or contingently or both to the\nlicensee at any time more than the maximum amounts prescribed in section\nthree hundred forty of this article.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 311.6 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 3 / Part 1 / Section 311.6
Joinder, severance and consolidation
Status: in_force

§ 311.6. Joinder, severance and consolidation. 1. Two crimes are\njoinable and may be included as separate counts in the same petition\nwhen:\n  (a) they are based upon the same act or upon the same criminal\ntransaction, as that term is defined in subdivision two; or\n  (b) even though based upon different criminal transactions, such\ncrimes, or the criminal transactions underlying them, are of such nature\nthat either proof of the first crime would be material and admissible as\nevidence in chief upon a fact-finding hearing of the second, or proof of\nthe second would be material and admissible as evidence in chief upon a\nfact-finding hearing of the first; or\n  (c) even though based upon different criminal transactions, and even\nthough not joinable pursuant to paragraph (b), such crimes are defined\nby the same or similar statutory provisions and consequently are the\nsame or similar in law.\n  2. "Criminal transaction" means conduct which establishes at least one\ncrime, and which is comprised of two or more or a group of acts either:\n  (a) so closely related and connected in point of time and circumstance\nof commission as to constitute a single criminal incident; or\n  (b) so closely related in criminal purpose or objective as to\nconstitute elements or integral parts of a single criminal venture.\n  3. In any case where two or more crimes or groups of crimes charged in\na petition are based upon different criminal transactions, and where\ntheir joinability rests solely upon the fact that such crimes, or as the\ncase may be at least one offense of each group, are the same or similar\nin law, as prescribed in paragraph (c) of subdivision one, the court, in\nthe interest of justice and for good cause shown, may upon application\nof either the respondent or the presentment agency order that any one of\nsuch crimes or groups of crimes be tried separately from the other or\nothers, or that two or more thereof be tried together but separately\nfrom two or more others thereof. Such application must be made within\nthe period prescribed in section 332.2.\n  4. When two or more petitions against the same respondent charge\ndifferent crimes of a kind that are joinable in a single petition\npursuant to subdivision one, the court may, upon application of either\nthe presentment agency or respondent order that such petitions be\nconsolidated and treated as a single petition for trial purposes. Such\napplication must be made within the period prescribed in section 332.2.\nIf the respondent requests consolidation with respect to crimes which\nare, pursuant to paragraph (a) of subdivision one, of a kind that are\njoinable in a single petition by reason of being based upon the same act\nor criminal transaction, the court must order such consolidation unless\ngood cause to the contrary be shown.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 115 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 9-A / Section 115
Company defined
Status: in_force

§ 115. Company defined.  The term "company," as used in this article,\nincludes all corporations, whether created under the laws of this state,\nor of the United States, or of those of any other state or nation.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 2416 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 23 / Section 2416
Court clerk; duty to account for fees
Status: in_force

§ 2416. Court clerk; duty to account for fees. The court clerk in each\ndistrict shall collect and receive all the fees, and account for and pay\nthe same into the county treasury at such times as the county treasurer\nmay prescribe, which account shall contain the title of each case and\nthe amount of fees received therein; and the salary of such clerk shall\nnot be paid until he shall have so accounted and paid. He shall perform\nno service until he shall have received the legal fees therefore.\n
N.Y. CVR Law § 52-C*2 — New York Code / Act CVR / Article 5 / Section 52-C*2
Employers engaged in electronic monitoring; prior notice required
Status: in_force

*§ 52-c. Employers engaged in electronic monitoring; prior notice\nrequired. 1. For purposes of this section, employer means any\nindividual, corporation, partnership, firm, or association with a place\nof business in the state. It shall not include the state or any\npolitical subdivision of the state.\n  2. (a) Any employer who monitors or otherwise intercepts telephone\nconversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmissions, or\ninternet access or usage of or by an employee by any electronic device\nor system, including but not limited to the use of a computer,\ntelephone, wire, radio, or electromagnetic, photoelectronic or\nphoto-optical systems, shall give prior written notice upon hiring to\nall employees who are subject to electronic monitoring. The notice\nrequired by this subdivision shall be in writing, in an electronic\nrecord, or in another electronic form and acknowledged by the employee\neither in writing or electronically. Each employer shall also post the\nnotice of electronic monitoring in a conspicuous place which is readily\navailable for viewing by its employees who are subject to electronic\nmonitoring.\n  (b) For purposes of written notice required by paragraph (a) of this\nsubdivision, an employee shall be advised that any and all telephone\nconversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmissions, or\ninternet access or usage by an employee by any electronic device or\nsystem, including but not limited to the use of a computer, telephone,\nwire, radio or electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photo-optical systems\nmay be subject to monitoring at any and all times and by any lawful\nmeans.\n  3. The attorney general may enforce the provisions of this section.\nAny employer found to be in violation of this section shall be subject\nto a maximum civil penalty of five hundred dollars for the first\noffense, one thousand dollars for the second offense and three thousand\ndollars for the third and each subsequent offense.\n  4. The provisions of this section shall not apply to processes that\nare designed to manage the type or volume of incoming or outgoing\nelectronic mail or telephone voice mail or internet usage, that are not\ntargeted to monitor or intercept the electronic mail or telephone voice\nmail or internet usage of a particular individual, and that are\nperformed solely for the purpose of computer system maintenance and/or\nprotection.\n  * NB There are 2 § 52-c's\n
N.Y. BSC Law § 1318 — New York Code / Act BSC / Article 13 / Section 1318
Liability of foreign corporations for failure to disclose required information
Status: in_force

§ 1318. Liability of foreign corporations for failure to disclose\n          required information.\n  A foreign corporation doing business in this state shall, in the same\nmanner as a domestic corporation, disclose to its shareholders of record\nwho are residents of this state the information required under paragraph\n(c) of section 510 (Dividends or other distributions in cash or\nproperty), paragraphs (f) and (g) of section 511 (Share distributions\nand changes), paragraph (d) of section 515 (Reacquired shares),\nparagraph (c) of section 516 (Reduction of stated capital in certain\ncases), and shall be liable as provided in section 520 (Liability for\nfailure to disclose required information) for failure to comply in good\nfaith with these requirements.\n