FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. EPT Law § 3-3.6 — New York Code / Act EPT / Article 3 / Part 3 / Section 3-3.6
Encumbrances on property of decedent or on proceeds of insurance
Status: in_force

§ 3-3.6 Encumbrances on property of decedent or on proceeds of insurance\n          policy on life of decedent not chargeable against assets of\n          decedent's estate\n  (a) Where any property, subject, at the time of decedent's death, to\nany lien, security interest or other charge, including a lien for unpaid\npurchase money, is specifically disposed of by will or passes to a\ndistributee, or where the proceeds of any policy of insurance on the\nlife of the decedent are payable to a named beneficiary and such policy\nis subject to any lien, security interest or other charge, the personal\nrepresentative is not responsible for the satisfaction of such\nencumbrance out of the property of the decedent's estate, except as\nprovided in SCPA 1811, unless, in the case of a will, the testator has\nexpressly or by necessary implication indicated otherwise. A general\nprovision in the will for the payment of debts is not such an\nindication.\n  (b) Any such encumbrance is chargeable against the property of the\ndecedent or the proceeds of a policy of insurance on the life of the\ndecedent, subject thereto. Nothing in this section imposes upon a\ntestamentary beneficiary, distributee or named insurance beneficiary any\npersonal liability for the payment of the debt secured by such\nencumbrance.\n  (c) Where any lien, security interest or other charge encumbers:\n  (1) Property passing to two or more persons, the interest of each such\nperson shall, only as between such persons, bear its proportionate share\nof the total encumbrance.\n  (2) Two or more properties, each such property shall, only as between\nthe recipients thereof, bear its proportionate share of the total\nencumbrance.\n
N.Y. DCD Law § 51 — New York Code / Act DCD / Article 3 / Section 51
To what court application to be made
Status: in_force

§ 51. To what court application to be made. Application for such a\ndischarge must be made, by the petition of the insolvent, addressed to\nthe county court of the county in which he resides; or, if he resides in\nthe city of New York, to the supreme court.\n
N.Y. CRC Law § 95 — New York Code / Act CRC / Article 6 / Section 95
Health code violations
Status: in_force

§ 95. Health code violations. Notwithstanding the provisions of any\nother law, violations of subdivision (f) of section 11.65, 131.11,\n139.07, 161.03, 161.05, 181.03, or 181.17 of the health code of the city\nare hereby declared to be violations. Punishment for violations of\nsubdivision (f) of section 11.65, section 131.11, 139.07, 161.03, 161.05\nor 181.03 shall be by a fine of not to exceed twenty-five dollars or by\nimprisonment for not to exceed ten days, or both and punishment for\nviolations of section 181.17 shall be by a fine of not to exceed fifty\ndollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed fifteen days or both.\nNotwithstanding the provisions of any other law, punishment for\nviolations of section 131.03 shall be by a fine of not to exceed two\nhundred dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed three months or\nboth.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 801 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 8 / Section 801
Provisional remedies; procedure
Status: in_force

§ 801. Provisional remedies; procedure.\n  Whenever the remedies set forth in § 209 of this act may issue out of\nthis court under the terms of said section, practice and procedure\nthereon shall be governed, insofar as consistent with this act, by the\nCPLR and such other provisions of law governing practice and procedure\nthereon in the supreme court, subject to the following:\n  (a) The remedy may be executed only within the county, against persons\nor property within the county.\n  (b) When a return is required, the return shall be made to the clerk\nof this court in the district out of which the remedy issued.\n  (c) 1. Where a notice of pendency may be filed with the county clerk,\npursuant to § 209(d) of this act, the original complaint shall be filed\nsimultaneously with such county clerk; service of summons shall\nthereafter be made within the time provided in CPLR § 6512. A copy of\nthe complaint shall be sufficient for the purpose of filing the same,\nafter service thereof, with the clerk of this court.\n  2. Where a notice of pendency is filed with the county clerk after the\naction has been commenced in this court, a copy of the complaint may be\nfiled therewith in lieu of the original complaint.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 265 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 16 / Section 265
Ice cutting and ice bridges
Status: in_force

§ 265. Ice cutting and ice bridges. A person or corporation cutting\nice in or upon any waters within the boundaries of this state for the\npurpose of removing the ice for sale or use, must surround the cuttings\nand openings made with fences or guards of boards or other material\nsufficient to form an obstruction to the free passage of persons through\nsuch fences or guards into the place where such ice is being cut. Such\nfences or guards must be erected at or before the time of commencing the\ncuttings or openings, and must be maintained until ice has again formed\ntherein to the thickness of at least three inches, or until the ice\nabout such openings has melted or broken up. Whoever omits to comply\nwith this section is guilty of a misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. TCP Law § 30-A — New York Code / Act TCP / Article 3 / Section 30-A
Merger or consolidation of telephone corporations
Status: in_force

§ 30-a. Merger or consolidation of telephone corporations. Any two or\nmore domestic telephone corporations may merge or consolidate with each\nother, in accordance with the procedure and with the effect set forth in\narticle nine of the business corporation law.\n
N.Y. STF Law § 179-G — New York Code / Act STF / Article 11-A / Section 179-G
Computation of interest payment
Status: in_force

§ 179-g. Computation of interest payment. Interest payments on amounts\ndue to a contractor pursuant to this article shall be paid to the\ncontractor for the period beginning on the day after the required\npayment date and ending on the payment date for those payments required\naccording to this article and shall be paid at the rate of interest in\neffect on the date when the interest payment is made. Notwithstanding\nany other provision of law to the contrary, interest shall be computed\nat the rate equal to the overpayment rate set by the commissioner of\ntaxation and finance pursuant to subsection (e) of section one thousand\nninety-six of the tax law.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 9-319 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 9 / Part 3 / Subpart 3 / Section 9-319
Rights and Title of Consignee with Respect to Creditors and Purchasers
Status: in_force

Section 9--319. Rights and Title of Consignee with Respect to Creditors\n                  and Purchasers.\n  (a) Consignee has consignor's rights. Except as otherwise provided in\nsubsection (b), for purposes of determining the rights of creditors of,\nand purchasers for value of goods from, a consignee, while the goods are\nin the possession of the consignee, the consignee is deemed to have\nrights and title to the goods identical to those the consignor had or\nhad power to transfer.\n  (b) Applicability of other law. For purposes of determining the rights\nof a creditor of a consignee, law other than this article determines the\nrights and title of a consignee while goods are in the consignee's\npossession if, under this part, a perfected security interest held by\nthe consignor would have priority over the rights of the creditor.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 342-II — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 342-II
Portion of the state highway system in the county of Oneida to be designated as the "Military Highway"
Status: in_force

* § 342-ii. Portion of the state highway system in the county of\nOneida to be designated as the "Military Highway". All that portion of\nthe state highway system in the county of Oneida constituting state\nroute 69 from the village of Camden to the hamlet of Taberg shall be\ndesignated and known as the "Military Highway".\n  * NB There are 3 § 342-ii's\n
N.Y. CRC Law § 90 — New York Code / Act CRC / Article 6 / Section 90
Inspection of penal and reformatory institutions
Status: in_force

§ 90. Inspection of penal and reformatory institutions. All judges of\nthe court shall visit at least once, preferably within three months\nafter their appointment, the workhouse, penitentiary and all other\nreformatories and institutions to which they have power to commit, and\nshall make further visits to such institutions as may be required by\nrule or order of court, and shall report in writing to the appellate\ndivisions of the supreme court exercising supervisory and administrative\npower over the court their observations with such recommendations as\nthey may deem proper.\n
N.Y. EDP Law § 702 — New York Code / Act EDP / Article 7 / Section 702
Incidental expenses
Status: in_force

§ 702. Incidental expenses. (A) The condemnor shall reimburse a\ncondemnee an amount separately computed and stated, representing the\nfollowing incidental expenses:\n  (1) any recording fees, transfer taxes and other similar expenses in\nconnection with the acquisition of the property by the condemnor or in\nconnection with the transfer of the property to the condemnor; and\n  (2) any penalty incurred by the condemnee for prepayment of any\npreexisting recorded mortgage entered into in good faith, encumbering\nsuch property; and\n  (3) the pro rata portion of the real property taxes, water rents,\nsewer rents, special ad valorem taxes and other charges paid or payable\nto a taxing entity which are allocable to a period subsequent to the\ndate of vesting title or the effective date of possession of such\nproperty in the condemnor, whichever is earlier.\n  (B) In the event that the procedure to acquire such property is\nabandoned by the condemnor, or a court of competent jurisdiction\ndetermines that the condemnor was not legally authorized to acquire the\nproperty, or a portion of such property, the condemnor shall be\nobligated to reimburse the condemnee, an amount, separately computed and\nstated, for actual and necessary costs, disbursements and expenses,\nincluding reasonable attorney, appraisal and engineering fees, and other\ndamages actually incurred by such condemnee because of the acquisition\nprocedure.\n  (C) In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines\nthat the condemnor did in fact take property after the condemnor denied\nthat there was any taking of property and made no offer to settle the\nclaim, the condemnor shall be obligated to reimburse a condemnee an\namount, separately computed and stated, for actual and necessary costs,\ndisbursements and expenses, including reasonable attorney, appraiser and\nengineer fees incurred in establishing the de facto taking.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 119-I — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 5-F / Section 119-I
Management and operation
Status: in_force

§ 119-i. Management and operation. The common facilities may be\nmanaged and operated by a joint operating agency or by one of the\nparticipating municipalities.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 7107 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 71 / Section 7107
Sheriff's return
Status: in_force

§ 7107. Sheriff's return. The sheriff shall file with the clerk a\nreturn within twenty days after he has delivered a chattel; it shall\ninclude all papers delivered to or served on him and a statement of all\naction taken by him. Where the sheriff has not filed a return before the\nhearing of a motion made by any party to punish him for contempt for\nsuch failure, he may be punished for contempt. At least ten days' notice\nof such motion shall be given to the sheriff.\n
N.Y. CNT Law § 257 — New York Code / Act CNT / Article 5-A / Section 257
Permissive referendum
Status: in_force

§ 257. Permissive referendum. 1. The provisions of sections one\nhundred one and one hundred two of this chapter and the applicable\nprovisions of the election law as to conduct of elections and\nqualifications of voters shall apply to permissive referenda conducted\nhereunder, except that only those electors shall be qualified to sign a\npetition and to vote who are resident within an area included in the\nproposed county district, and provided further that the number of\nsignatures required on the petition shall be one hundred or five per\ncentum of the owners of taxable real property situated within the\nproposed district, whichever shall be less.\n  2. The clerk of the board of supervisors shall cause to be prepared\nand have available for distribution proper forms for such petition and\nshall distribute a supply to any person requesting the same.\n  3. Where there are no resident electors within an area included in the\nproposed county district, the referendum may be waived upon\ncertification by the county board of elections that there are no\nqualified electors.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 412 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 4 / Section 412
Accrual of interest
Status: in_force

§ 412. Accrual of interest.\n  In any action, petition, order to show cause or other proceeding\nwherein interest accrues from the date of the inception of the action,\npetition, order or proceeding, such entitlement to interest shall not\naccrue until service is completed by the actual index number being\nproperly depicted on the summons and provided to the party to be charged\nwith payment of interest.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 411 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 4 / Part 1 / Section 411
Jurisdiction
Status: in_force

§ 411. Jurisdiction. The family court has exclusive original\njurisdiction over proceedings for support or maintenance under this\narticle and in proceedings under article five-B of this act, known as\nthe uniform interstate family support act.  On its own motion, the court\nmay at any time in the proceedings also direct the filing of a neglect\npetition in accord with article ten of this act.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 359 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 9 / Section 359
Authority of superintendent
Status: in_force

§ 359. Authority of superintendent. The superintendent is hereby\nauthorized and empowered to make such general rules and regulations, and\nsuch specific rulings, demands, and findings as may be necessary for the\nproper conduct of the business authorized and licensed under and for the\nenforcement of this article, in addition hereto and not inconsistent\nherewith.\n
N.Y. CCO Law § 113 — New York Code / Act CCO / Article 6 / Section 113
Reserves
Status: in_force

§ 113. Reserves. In addition to reserves for depreciation, depletion,\nobsolescence and bad debts, agricultural cooperatives shall create and\nmaintain minimum general purpose reserves. Such reserves shall be set\naside periodically until or unless they total an aggregate minimum\namount computed in accordance with one of the following optional\nmethods.\n  The aggregate minimum amount of such general purpose reserve shall be\ncomputed and equal either (1) at least two per centum of the average\nannual gross receipts of the preceding five years to be accumulated at a\nrate of not less than two-fifths of one per centum of the gross receipts\nper annum or such part thereof as may be necessary to establish and\nmaintain such reserves, or (2) at least the total amount of paid up\ncapital stock or membership capital contributed to the corporation\naccumulated at a rate of not less than ten per centum of the net margins\nin each year or such part thereof as may be necessary to establish and\nto maintain such reserve, or (3) at least an amount necessary to\nestablish a sixty per centum net worth wherein the paid in capital and\nsurplus (including the general purpose reserve) shall equal sixty per\ncentum of the total assets of the cooperative. Such a reserve shall be\naccumulated at a rate of not less than ten per centum of the net margins\nin each year or such part thereof as may be necessary to establish and\nto maintain such reserves.\n  The general purpose reserve created, accumulated and maintained in\naccordance with this article six shall be deemed to be a required\nstatutory reserve for each agricultural cooperative as defined in this\narticle.\n
N.Y. TCP Law § 111 — New York Code / Act TCP / Article 9 / Section 111
Municipal consent to use streets
Status: in_force

§ 111. Municipal consent to use streets. A district steam corporation\nshall have power to lay and maintain suitable pipes and conduits or\nother fixtures in and under the streets, parks and public places of the\ncities, villages or towns mentioned in its certificate of incorporation\nupon obtaining the written consent of the local authorities thereof and\nupon such reasonable regulations as they may prescribe. Such local\nauthorities shall be: in a city, a majority of the members of the local\nlegislative body; in a village, a majority of the members of the board\nof trustees; in a town, outside of a village, the town superintendent of\nhighways and a majority of the members of the town board.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 343-T*5 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 12 / Section 343-T*5
Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the "M
Status: in_force

* § 343-t. Portion of the state highway system to be designated as the\n"M. Paul Keesler Memorial Highway". All that portion of the state\nhighway system constituting part of state route twenty-eight from the\ntown of Poland, county of Chautauqua in a generally northwesterly\ndirection to its intersection with state route twelve in the village of\nBarneveld, county of Oneida shall be designated and known as the "M.\nPaul Keesler Memorial Highway".\n  * NB There are 7 § 343-t's\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 5215 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 52 / Section 5215
Collusive judgments
Status: in_force

§ 5215. Collusive judgments. No claim against the corporation shall be\nallowed if the court finds, upon the hearing for the allowance of the\nclaim, that the judgment upon which the claim is founded was obtained by\nfraud, or by collusion of the plaintiff and of any defendant in the\naction, relating to any matter affecting the cause of action upon which\nthe judgment is founded or the amount of damages assessed therein.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 301 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 3 / Section 301
Transitory actions; venue
Status: in_force

§ 301. Transitory actions; venue.\n  An action, other than an action to establish a mechanic's lien on real\nproperty, shall be brought:\n  (a) in the district in which one of the parties resides at the\ncommencement thereof; or\n  (b) if no party then resides in such district, in the district in\nwhich one of the parties has regular employment or a place for the\nregular transaction of business; or\n  (c) if no party has such employment or place of business within such\ndistrict, in the district in which the cause of action arose; or\n  (d) if none of the foregoing are applicable, in any district.\n
N.Y. HAY Law § 332 — New York Code / Act HAY / Article 11 / Section 332
Portion of the Mohawk-Hudson Bike-Hike Trail to be designated as the "Ronald H
Status: in_force

§ 332. Portion of the Mohawk-Hudson Bike-Hike Trail to be designated\nas the "Ronald H. Miller Memorial Bike Trail". All that portion of the\nMohawk-Hudson Bike-Hike Trail in the village of Menands, commencing at\nthe city of Watervliet border, continuing in a generally southerly\ndirection and terminating at the city of Albany border, shall be\ndesignated and known as the "Ronald H. Miller Memorial Bike Trail".\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 158-B — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 5 / Section 158-B
Appointment of calendar clerk for Schenectady county in the fourth judicial district
Status: in_force

§ 158-b. Appointment of calendar clerk for Schenectady county in the\nfourth judicial district.  The justices of the supreme court for the\nfourth judicial district, or the majority of them, may appoint and may\nat pleasure remove a calendar clerk in and for the county of\nSchenectady. No person shall be eligible to such appointment unless he\nshall be a resident elector of the county of Schenectady. His\nqualifications and fitness for the office shall be determined and\napproved by the justices making the appointment. He shall have charge of\nall the calendars of the supreme court in and for said county and shall\nbe governed by and have such powers as are provided by the rules and/or\nregulations adopted from time to time in accordance with statute.  The\ncounty board of representatives of Schenectady county shall fix the\nsalary of such clerk and may authorize him to employ within the\nappropriations made by said board, such clerical force or other\nassistants as it shall determine.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 354 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 9 / Section 354
Restrictions on assignments of compensation for services
Status: in_force

§ 354. Restrictions on assignments of compensation for services. 1. A\nlicensee shall not take an assignment of unearned wages or other\nearnings unless:\n  (a) the assignment by its terms is revocable at the will of the\nborrower; or\n  (b) the assignment is a payroll deduction plan.\n  2. No assignment of wages or other earnings given to secure any loan\nhereunder shall be valid unless the amount of such loan is paid to the\nborrower simultaneously with its execution.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 2-719 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 2 / Part 7 / Section 2-719
Contractual Modification or Limitation of Remedy
Status: in_force

Section 2--719. Contractual Modification or Limitation of Remedy.\n  (1) Subject to the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) of this\nsection and of the preceding section on liquidation and limitation of\ndamages,\n       (a) the agreement may provide for remedies in addition to or in\n           substitution for those provided in this Article and may limit\n           or alter the measure of damages recoverable under this\n           Article, as by limiting the buyer's remedies to return of the\n           goods and repayment of the price or to repair and replacement\n           of non-conforming goods or parts; and\n       (b) resort to a remedy as provided is optional unless the remedy\n           is expressly agreed to be exclusive, in which case it is the\n           sole remedy.\n  (2) Where circumstances cause an exclusive or limited remedy to fail\nof its essential purpose, remedy may be had as provided in this Act.\n  (3) Consequential damages may be limited or excluded unless the\nlimitation or exclusion is unconscionable. Limitation of consequential\ndamages for injury to the person in the case of consumer goods is prima\nfacie unconscionable but limitation of damages where the loss is\ncommercial is not.\n