FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. NAV Law § 45-AAAA — New York Code / Act NAV / Article 4 / Part 1 / Section 45-AAAA
Special provisions relating to reckless operation and speed on Greenwood Lake
Status: in_force

* § 45-aaaa. Special provisions relating to reckless operation and\nspeed on Greenwood Lake. 1. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this\nchapter or any inconsistent local laws (a) every pleasure vessel\noperated on Greenwood Lake within Orange county, shall be operated in a\ncareful and prudent manner, in such a way as not to unreasonably\ninterfere with or endanger any other vessel or person; a violation of\nthis paragraph shall be a misdemeanor punishable as set forth in section\nseventy-three-b of this article; and (b) no vessel shall be operated on\nsuch lake at a speed exceeding forty-five miles per hour nor shall any\npleasure vessel be operated at a speed exceeding fifteen miles per hour\nbetween one-half hour after sunset and one-half hour before sunrise; a\nviolation of this paragraph shall be a violation punishable as set forth\nin section seventy-three-c of this article.\n  2. No vessel shall be operated within two hundred feet of the shore, a\ndock, pier, raft or float or an anchored or moored vessel at a speed\nexceeding five miles per hour, unless such vessel is being operated near\nsuch shore, dock, float, pier, raft or anchored vessel for the purpose\nof enabling a person engaged in water skiing to take off or land. A\nviolation of this subdivision shall be a violation punishable as set\nforth in section seventy-three-c of this article.\n  3. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any pleasure\nvessel competing in or practicing for a regatta or boat race over a\nspecified course held by a bona fide club or racing association between\nnine o'clock in the morning and sunset, provided that due written notice\nof the date of the race has been given to the appropriate law\nenforcement agency at least fifteen days prior to such race, pursuant to\nthe provisions of section thirty-four of this chapter, and all\nprovisions of this section have been complied with.\n  * NB There are 2 § 45-aaaa's\n
N.Y. NPC Law § 1206 — New York Code / Act NPC / Article 12 / Section 1206
Powers of permanent receiver
Status: in_force

§ 1206. Powers of permanent receiver.\n  (a) A permanent receiver, upon qualifying under section 1204 (Oath and\nsecurity), shall be vested with title to all the property of the\ncorporation wherever situated or of the property in this state of a\nforeign corporation against which an action or special proceeding has\nbeen brought under subparagraph (a) (4) of section 1202 (Appointment of\nreceiver of property of a domestic or foreign corporation), for the\nbenefit of the creditors and members of the corporation.\n  (b) A permanent receiver shall have the power:\n  (1) To sue in his own name or otherwise for the recovery of the\nproperty, debts and causes of action of the corporation. No set-off or\ncounterclaim shall be allowed in any such action for any demand unless\nit was owing by the corporation to the defendant before the commencement\nof the action or special proceeding in which the receiver was appointed\nor unless it shall have been incurred by the receiver subsequent to his\nappointment.\n  (2) To sell at public or private sale all the property vested in the\npermanent receiver, in such manner and on such terms and conditions as\nthe court shall direct, and to make necessary transfers and conveyances\nthereof.\n  (3) To examine on oath, to be administered by the permanent receiver,\nany person concerning any matter pertaining to or affecting the\nreceivership.\n  (4) To settle or compound any demands by or against the receivership.\n  (c) When more than one receiver is appointed, all provisions in this\narticle in reference to one receiver shall apply to them.\n  (d) When more than one receiver is appointed, the debts and property\nof the corporation may be collected and received by any of them; when\nmore than two receivers are appointed, the powers and rights conferred\non them may be exercised by any two.\n  (e) When more than one receiver is appointed, the survivor or\nsurvivors of such receivers shall have all the powers and rights of the\nreceivers.\n
N.Y. PML Law § 308 — New York Code / Act PML / Article 3 / Section 308
Officials at harness horse race meetings
Status: in_force

§ 308. Officials at harness horse race meetings.  1. At all harness\nrace meetings licensed by the commission in accordance with the\nprovisions of sections two hundred twenty-two through seven hundred five\nof this chapter qualified judges and starters shall be designated by the\ncommission. Such officials shall enforce the rules and regulations of\nthe commission and shall render regular written reports of the\nactivities and conduct of such race meetings to the commission.\n  2. The licensed racing corporations shall reimburse the commission for\nthe per diem cost to the commission to employ one associate judge and\nthe starter to serve at harness race meetings. The commission shall\nnotify each such licensed racing corporation of the per diem cost of the\nassociate judge and the starter at the track of such licensed racing\ncorporation within sixty days of the end of each month. Payment of the\nreimbursement required by this section shall be made to the commission\nby each entity required to make such payments within thirty days of such\nnotification by the commission and shall cover all the costs incurred\nduring that month. A penalty of five percent of payment due, and\ninterest at the rate of one percent per month calculated from such date\nthat payment is due to the date of the payment of the per diem cost\nshall be payable in case any per diem cost imposed by this subdivision\nis not paid when due. The commission shall promulgate rules and\nregulations to ensure the proper reimbursement of such costs.\n  3. The commission shall pay into the racing regulation account, as\ndefined in section ninety-nine-i of the state finance law, under the\njoint custody of the comptroller and the commission, the total amount of\nthe reimbursements collected pursuant to this section. With the approval\nof the director of the budget, monies used to pay the costs and expenses\nof the operations of the commission shall be paid out of such account on\nthe audit and warrant of the comptroller on vouchers, certified and\napproved by the director of the division of the budget or his or her\nduly designated official.\n  4. Any associate judge and starter whose per diem costs are reimbursed\nby a licensed racing corporation shall remain employees of the\ncommission and shall retain all the rights and privileges of their\ncurrent civil service jurisdictional classification and status and\ncollective bargaining unit representation.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 574 — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 12-B / Section 574
Credit upon anticipation of payments
Status: in_force

§ 574. Credit upon anticipation of payments.  1. Notwithstanding the\nprovisions of any premium finance agreement to the contrary, any insured\nmay pay it in full at any time before the maturity of the final\ninstalment of the balance thereof and, if he does so and the agreement\nincluded an amount for service charge, shall receive and be entitled to\nreceive for such anticipation a refund credit thereon.\n  2. The amount of any such refund credit shall represent at least as\ngreat a proportion of the service charge, if any, as the sum of the\nperiodic balances after the month in which prepayment is made bears to\nthe sum of all periodic balances under the schedule of instalments in\nthe agreement. Such refund shall be computed in the service charge\nexclusive of the additional charge. Where the amount of the refund\ncredit for anticipation of payment is less than one dollar, no refund\nneed be made.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 60.36 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 2 / Title E / Article 60 / Section 60.36
Authorized dispositions; driving while intoxicated offenses
Status: in_force

§ 60.36 Authorized dispositions; driving while intoxicated offenses.\n  Where a court is imposing a sentence for a violation of subdivision\ntwo, two-a, or three of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle\nand traffic law pursuant to sections 65.00 or 65.05 of this title and,\nas a condition of such sentence, orders the installation and maintenance\nof an ignition interlock device, the court may impose any other penalty\nauthorized pursuant to section eleven hundred ninety-three of the\nvehicle and traffic law.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 26 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 2 / Section 26
Transfer of property and records in custody of council of agriculture and markets
Status: in_force

§ 26. Transfer of property and records in custody of council of\nagriculture and markets.  The property, records, books, papers and\ndocuments, if any, in the custody, possession or control of the council\nof agriculture and markets at the time this section takes effect, which\npertain or relate to any of the functions, powers and duties of the\ndepartment of agriculture and markets or of the council, which is hereby\nabolished, shall be delivered and belong to the department of\nagriculture and markets.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 182.30 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title H / Article 182 / Section 182.30
Regulation of electronic appearances by the chief administrator
Status: in_force

* § 182.30 Regulation of electronic appearances by the chief\n             administrator.\n  The chief administrator of the courts shall adopt rules to regulate\nthe conduct of electronic appearances pursuant to this article that\nshall, among other provisions, be designed to: (a) provide appropriate\naccess to electronic appearances by crime victims and their families,\nfamily members of defendants, the media and other members of the public;\nprovided that such appropriate access shall be limited to the means of\nprojecting a proceeding being conducted entirely by electronic\nappearances in a publicly accessible area of a courthouse or by\nprojecting the electronic appearances of a proceeding comprised of both\nin-person physical appearances and electronic appearances in the\ncourtroom in which the proceeding is taking place; and (b) ensure that\nany system for arraignments provides a full and fair opportunity for any\ndefendant, without prejudice, to choose to have an arraignment conducted\nwith the defendant physically present, rather than through an electronic\nappearance.\n  * NB Repealed September 1, 2028\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 1045 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 10 / Part 4 / Section 1045
Definition of "dispositional hearing"
Status: in_force

§ 1045. Definition of "dispositional hearing". When used in this\narticle, "dispositional hearing" means a hearing to determine what order\nof disposition should be made.\n
N.Y. COM Law § 181-C — New York Code / Act COM / Article 5-E / Section 181-C
Legislative intent
Status: in_force

* § 181-c. Legislative intent. The legislature recognizes the\nimportance of the sport of golf as an economic engine in New York. As\nthe sport of golf continues to become more popular, golf vacation\nexperiences will grow commensurately as tourist destinations. A recent\nstudy by the National Golf Foundation found that in neighboring\nPennsylvania, the golf industry generates 1.1 billion dollars in direct\neconomic benefit and 2.3 billion dollars in direct and indirect\nbenefits, making it one of the largest industries in Pennsylvania. Golf\nenthusiasts typically enjoy flexible incomes and spend at above average\nlevels on golf vacations. New York state must act to capitalize on this\nvisitor spending. As home to many premiere golf courses, as well as\naffordable courses, New York is in an excellent position to attract\ntravelers seeking a unique golf experience. The state must take on the\nresponsibility of making New York an attractive and user-friendly\ndestination for all travelers seeking a golf experience.\n  * NB There are 2 § 181-c's\n
N.Y. ISC Law § 7812 — New York Code / Act ISC / Article 78 / Section 7812
Life insurance applications
Status: in_force

§ 7812. Life insurance applications. (a) Without limiting the ability\nof an insurer to assess the insurability of a policy applicant and to\ndetermine whether or not to issue the policy, and in addition to other\nquestions an insurer may lawfully pose to a life insurance applicant,\ninsurers may inquire in the application for insurance whether the\nproposed owner intends to pay premiums with the assistance of financing\nfrom a lender that will use the policy as collateral to support the\nfinancing.\n  (b) The insurer may include the following notice to the applicant and\nthe insured, or other notice acceptable to the superintendent, on the\napplication or as an amendment thereto: "If you enter into a loan\narrangement where the policy is used as collateral, and the policy\nchanges ownership at some point in the future in satisfaction of the\nloan, then the following may be true:\n  (1) a change of ownership may lead to a person unknown to you owning\nan interest in the insured's life;\n  (2) a change of ownership may limit your ability to purchase insurance\nin the future on the insured's life because there is a limit to how much\ncoverage insurers will issue on one life;\n  (3) if ownership of the life insurance policy changes, and you wish to\nobtain more insurance coverage on the insured's life in the future, the\ninsured's higher issue age, a change in health status, and/or other\nfactors may reduce the ability to obtain coverage and/or may result in\nsignificantly higher premiums; and\n  (4) you should consult a professional advisor, since a change in\nownership in satisfaction of the loan may result in tax consequences to\nthe owner."\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 580-205 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 5-B / Part 2 / Section 580-205
Continuing exclusive jurisdiction to modify child support order
Status: in_force

§ 580-205. Continuing exclusive jurisdiction to modify child support\norder. (a) A tribunal of this state that has issued a child support\norder consistent with the law of this state has and shall exercise\ncontinuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify its child support order if\nthe order is the controlling order and:\n  (1) at the time of the filing of a request for modification this state\nis the residence of the obligor, the individual obligee or the child for\nwhose benefit the support order is issued; or\n  (2) even if this state is not the residence of the obligor, the\nindividual obligee or the child for whose benefit the support order is\nissued, the parties consent in a record or in open court that the\ntribunal of this state may continue to exercise jurisdiction to modify\nits order.\n  (b) A tribunal of this state that has issued a child support order\nconsistent with the law of this state may not exercise continuing,\nexclusive jurisdiction to modify the order if:\n  (1) all of the parties who are individuals file consent in a record\nwith the tribunal of this state that a tribunal of another state that\nhas jurisdiction over at least one of the parties who is an individual\nor that is located in the state of residence of the child may modify the\norder and assume continuing, exclusive jurisdiction; or\n  (2) its order is not the controlling order.\n  (c) If a tribunal of another state has issued a child support order\npursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act or a law\nsubstantially similar to that act which modifies a child support order\nof a tribunal of this state, tribunals of this state shall recognize the\ncontinuing, exclusive jurisdiction of the tribunal of the other state.\n  (d) A tribunal of this state that lacks continuing, exclusive\njurisdiction to modify a child support order may serve as an initiating\ntribunal to request a tribunal of another state to modify a support\norder issued in that state.\n  (e) A temporary support order issued ex parte or pending resolution of\na jurisdictional conflict does not create continuing, exclusive\njurisdiction in the issuing tribunal.\n
N.Y. SCC Law § 52 — New York Code / Act SCC / Article 5 / Section 52
Secretary and assistants
Status: in_force

§ 52. Secretary and assistants. The mayor shall appoint a secretary\nand such other assistants as may be prescribed by the board of estimate\nand apportionment.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 260.24 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title O / Article 260 / Section 260.24
Endangering the welfare of an incompetent or physically disabled person in the second degree
Status: in_force

§ 260.24 Endangering the welfare of an incompetent or physically\n           disabled person in the second degree.\n  A person is guilty of endangering the welfare of an incompetent or\nphysically disabled person in the second degree when he or she\nrecklessly engages in conduct which is likely to be injurious to the\nphysical, mental or moral welfare of a person who is unable to care for\nhimself or herself because of physical disability, mental disease or\ndefect.\n  Endangering the welfare of an incompetent or physically disabled\nperson in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 1815 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 18 / Section 1815
Appearance by non-attorney representatives
Status: in_force

§ 1815. Appearance by non-attorney representatives.\n  The court may permit, upon the request of a party, that a non-attorney\nrepresentative, who is related by consanguinity or affinity to such\nparty, be allowed to appear on behalf of such party when the court finds\nthat due to the age, mental or physical capacity or other disability of\nsuch party that it is in the interests of justice to permit such\nrepresentation. No person acting as a non-attorney representative shall\nbe permitted to charge a fee or be allowed to accept any form of\nremuneration for such services.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 1075 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 10 / Part 7 / Section 1075
Special duties of attorney for the child
Status: in_force

§ 1075. Special duties of attorney for the child. In addition to all\nother duties and responsibilities necessary to the representation of a\nchild who is the subject of a proceeding under this article, an attorney\nfor a child shall upon receipt of a report from a child protective\nagency pursuant to sections one thousand thirty-nine, one thousand\nthirty-nine-a, one thousand fifty-two-a, one thousand fifty-three, one\nthousand fifty-four, one thousand fifty-five, one thousand fifty-seven\nand one thousand fifty-eight, review the information contained therein\nand make a determination as to whether there is reasonable cause to\nsuspect that the child is at risk of further abuse or neglect or that\nthere has been a substantive violation of a court order. Where the\nattorney for the child makes such a determination, the attorney shall\napply to the court for appropriate relief pursuant to section one\nthousand sixty-one. Nothing contained in this section shall relieve a\nchild protective agency or social services official of its duties\npursuant to this act or the social services law.\n
N.Y. MHY Law § 16.37 — New York Code / Act MHY / Title C / Article 16 / Section 16.37
Autism spectrum disorder booklet; first responders
Status: in_force

§ 16.37 Autism spectrum disorder booklet; first responders.\n  The commissioner, in consultation with other appropriate agency\nrepresentatives, shall prepare for publication and cause to be\ndistributed to first responders, including emergency medical services\npersonnel, firefighters and police officers, a booklet containing\ninformation on recognizing the behavioral symptoms and characteristics\nof children and adults with autism spectrum disorders. Such booklet also\nshall contain information on additional resources and any other\ninformation deemed necessary and appropriate by the commissioner.\n
N.Y. ELN Law § 6-160 — New York Code / Act ELN / Article 6 / Section 6-160
Primaries
Status: in_force

§ 6-160. Primaries. 1. If more candidates are designated for the\nnomination of a party for an office to be filled by the voters of the\nentire state than there are vacancies, the nomination or nominations of\nthe party shall be made at the primary election at which other\ncandidates for public office are nominated and the candidate or\ncandidates receiving the most votes shall be the nominees of the party.\n  2. All persons designated for uncontested offices or positions at a\nprimary election shall be deemed nominated or elected thereto, as the\ncase may be, without balloting.\n
N.Y. UDC Law § 408 — New York Code / Act UDC / Article 4 / Section 408
Summons; service outside county to bring in certain additional parties
Status: in_force

§ 408. Summons; service outside county to bring in certain additional\n         parties.\n  A summons may be served in such manner and at such place, regardless\nof county or state lines, as would confer jurisdiction on supreme court\nin a like instance, upon:\n  (a) a third-party defendant as set forth in CPLR § 1007;\n  (b) a person not a party against whom a counterclaim is asserted\npursuant to CPLR § 3019(a);\n  (c) a person not a party against whom a cross-claim is asserted\npursuant to CPLR § 3019(b);\n  (d) a claimant whom a defendant stakeholder seeks to bring into the\naction pursuant to CPLR § 1006(b); and\n  (e) a person whom the court has ordered joined as a party pursuant to\nCPLR § 1001.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 180.50 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title K / Article 180 / Section 180.50
Tampering with a sports contest in the second degree
Status: in_force

§ 180.50 Tampering with a sports contest in the second degree.\n  A person is guilty of tampering with a sports contest when, with\nintent to influence the outcome of a sports contest, he tampers with any\nsports participant, sports official or with any animal or equipment or\nother thing involved in the conduct or operation of a sports contest in\na manner contrary to the rules and usages purporting to govern such a\ncontest.\n  Tampering with a sports contest in the second degree is a class A\nmisdemeanor.\n
N.Y. UCC Law § 7-601 — New York Code / Act UCC / Article 7 / Part 6 / Section 7-601
Lost, Stolen, or Destroyed Documents of Title
Status: in_force

Section 7--601. Lost, Stolen, or Destroyed Documents of Title.\n  (a) If a document of title is lost, stolen, or destroyed, a court may\norder delivery of the goods or issuance of a substitute document and the\nbailee may without liability to any person comply with the order. If the\ndocument was negotiable, a court may not order delivery of the goods or\nissuance of a substitute document without the claimant's posting\nsecurity unless it finds that any person that may suffer loss as a\nresult of nonsurrender of possession or control of the document is\nadequately protected against the loss. If the document was\nnonnegotiable, the court may require security. The court may also order\npayment of the bailee's reasonable costs and attorney's fees in any\naction under this subsection.\n  (b) A bailee that, without a court order, delivers goods to a person\nclaiming under a missing negotiable document of title is liable to any\nperson injured thereby. If the delivery is not in good faith, the bailee\nis liable for conversion. Delivery in good faith is not conversion if\nthe claimant posts security with the bailee in an amount at least double\nthe value of the goods at the time of posting to indemnify any person\ninjured by the delivery which files a notice of claim within one year\nafter the delivery.\n