FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. CPL Law § 470.35 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 2 / Title M / Article 470 / Section 470.35
Determination by court of appeals of appeals from orders of intermediate appellate courts; scope of review
Status: in_force

§ 470.35  Determination by court of appeals of appeals from orders of\n             intermediate appellate courts; scope of review.\n  1.  Upon an appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an\nintermediate appellate court affirming a judgment, sentence or order of\na criminal court, the court of appeals may consider and determine not\nonly questions of law which were raised or considered upon the appeal to\nthe intermediate appellate court, but also any question of law involving\nalleged error or defect in the criminal court proceedings resulting in\nthe original criminal court judgment, sentence or order, regardless of\nwhether such question was raised, considered or determined upon the\nappeal to the intermediate appellate court.\n  2.  Upon an appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an\nintermediate appellate court reversing or modifying a judgment, sentence\nor order of a criminal court, the court of appeals may consider and\ndetermine:\n  (a)  Any question of law which was determined by the intermediate\nappellate court and which, as so determined, constituted a basis for\nsuch court's order of reversal or modification; and\n  (b)  Any other question of law involving alleged or possible error or\ndefect in the criminal court proceedings resulting in the original\njudgment, sentence or order which may have adversely affected the party\nwho was appellant in the intermediate appellate court and who is\nrespondent in the court of appeals.  The court of appeals is not\nprecluded from considering and determining such a question by the\ncircumstance that it was not considered or determined by the\nintermediate appellate court, or that it did not constitute a basis for\nsuch court's reversal or modification, or that the party who may have\nbeen adversely affected thereby is the respondent rather than the\nappellant in the court of appeals; and the court of appeals, even though\nrejecting the intermediate appellate court's reasons for its order of\nreversal or modification, may affirm or modify such order upon the basis\nof such other questions; and\n  (c)  Any question concerning the legality of the corrective action\ntaken by the intermediate appellate court.\n  3.  Upon such an appeal, the court must affirm, reverse or modify the\nintermediate appellate court order.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 230.30 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title M / Article 230 / Section 230.30
Promoting prostitution in the second degree
Status: in_force

§ 230.30 Promoting prostitution in the second degree.\n  A person is guilty of promoting prostitution in the second degree when\nhe or she knowingly:\n  1. Advances prostitution by compelling a person by force or\nintimidation to engage in prostitution, or profits from such coercive\nconduct by another; or\n  2. Advances or profits from prostitution of a person less than\neighteen years old.\n  Promoting prostitution in the second degree is a class C felony.\n
N.Y. STF Law § 99-CC — New York Code / Act STF / Article 6 / Section 99-CC
Solid waste fund
Status: in_force

§ 99-cc. Solid waste fund. 1. Notwithstanding sections eight, eight-a\nand seventy of this chapter or any other provision of law, rule,\nregulation, or practice to the contrary, there is hereby established in\nthe joint custody of the state comptroller and the commissioner of\ntaxation and finance a solid waste fund, which shall be classified by\nthe state comptroller as an enterprise fund type, and which shall\nconsist of all moneys received from private entities by the commissioner\nof general services for the sale of recyclables.\n  2. Moneys within the solid waste fund shall be available to the\ncommissioner of general services for services and expenses of the office\nrelating to the collection, processing and sale of recycled materials.\n
N.Y. PBG Law § 625 — New York Code / Act PBG / Article 15 / Section 625
Short title
Status: in_force

§ 625. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited as\nthe "New York city public housing preservation trust act".\n
N.Y. VIL Law § 7-716 — New York Code / Act VIL / Article 7 / Section 7-716
Conflict with other laws
Status: in_force

§ 7-716 Conflict with other laws. Wherever the regulations made under\nauthority of this act require a greater width of size of yards or\ncourts, or require a lower height of building or less number of stories,\nor require a greater percentage of lot to be left unoccupied, or impose\nother higher standards than are required in any other statute or local\nlaw or regulation, the provisions of the regulations made under\nauthority of this act shall govern. Wherever the provisions of any other\nstatute or local ordinance or regulation require a greater width or size\nof yards or courts, or require a lower height of building or a less\nnumber of stories, or require a greater percentage of lot to be left\nunoccupied, or impose other higher standards than are required by the\nregulations made under authority of this act, the provisions of such\nstatute, or local ordinance or regulation shall govern.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 215.80 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title L / Article 215 / Section 215.80
Unlawful disposition of assets subject to forfeiture
Status: in_force

§ 215.80 Unlawful disposition of assets subject to forfeiture.\n  Any defendant in a forfeiture action pursuant to article thirteen-A of\nthe civil practice law and rules who knowingly and intentionally\nconceals, destroys, dissipates, alters, removes from the jurisdiction,\nor otherwise disposes of, property specified in a provisional remedy\nordered by the court or in a judgment of forfeiture in knowing contempt\nof said order shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 1343 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 13-A / Section 1343
Notice of pendency; constructive notice
Status: in_force

§ 1343. Notice of pendency; constructive notice. A notice of pendency\nmay be filed in any action brought pursuant to this article in which the\njudgment demanded would affect the title to, or the possession, use or\nenjoyment of, real property. The pendency of such an action is\nconstructive notice, from the time of filing of the notice only, to a\npurchaser from, or incumbrancer against, any defendant named in a notice\nof pendency indexed in a block index against a block in which property\naffected is situated or any defendant against whose name a notice of\npendency is indexed. A person whose conveyance or incumbrance is\nrecorded after the filing of the notice is bound by all proceedings\ntaken in the action after such filing to the same extent as if he or she\nwere a party.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 525 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 16 / Section 525
Trial and grand jurors; duration of service
Status: in_force

§ 525. Trial and grand jurors; duration of service. (a) Except as\nprovided in subdivision (d) of this section, service of trial jurors in\ncourts of the unified court system shall not be more than five court\ndays actual attendance or for such shorter period as the commissioner of\njurors shall determine, except that such service shall continue until\nthe conclusion of any trial in which a juror may be engaged.\n  (b) Service of grand jurors in courts of the unified court system\nshall be for the duration of the term for which they have been drawn,\nunless sooner discharged; except that if the term of a grand jury has\nbeen extended by written order of the court having supervision of such\ngrand jury, service shall continue until such grand jury has been\ndischarged.\n  (c) For the purposes of this section, actual attendance shall include\na juror's actual physical attendance wherein the court convenes or\nservice by means of a telephone standby system whereby a juror shall\nremain available to report for jury service upon notification by means\nof telephone or other electronic communication.\n  (d) If the commissioner of jurors, after consultation with and\nconcurrence of the district administrative judge or judges, or in the\ncounties within the city of New York the deputy chief administrative\njudge, shall determine that sufficient numbers of potential jurors\ncannot be provided to any term or part of court the commissioner may\nextend such period of jury service for such additional period as may be\nnecessary.\n
N.Y. GOB Law § 18-104 — New York Code / Act GOB / Article 18 / Section 18-104
Duties of passengers
Status: in_force

§ 18-104. Duties of passengers. All passengers shall have the\nfollowing duties:\n  1. To familiarize themselves with the safe use of any tramway prior to\nits use;\n  2. To remain in the tramway if the operation of a passenger tramway,\nas defined pursuant to section two hundred two-c of the labor law, is\ninterrupted for any reason, until instructions or aid are provided by\nthe ski area operator;\n  3. To board or disembark from passenger tramways only at points or\nareas designated by the ski area operator;\n  4. Not to eject any objects or material from a passenger tramway;\n  5. To use restraint devices in accordance with posted instructions;\n  6. To wear retention straps or other devices to prevent runaway skis;\n  7. Not to interfere with the operation of a passenger tramway;\n  8. Not to place or caused to be placed on the uphill track of a\nsurface lift any object which may interfere with its normal operation;\nand\n  9. Not to wear loose scarves, clothing or accessories or expose long\nhair which may become entangled with any part of the device.\n
N.Y. BNK Law § 75-H — New York Code / Act BNK / Article 2-AA / Section 75-H
Compliance with local building code and all other applicable provisions of law
Status: in_force

§ 75-h. Compliance with local building code and all other applicable\nprovisions of law. Unless otherwise provided in this article, nothing\ncontained in this article shall be construed to exempt or relieve any\nbanking institution from complying with all relevant provisions of the\nlocal building code and all other applicable provisions of law.\n
N.Y. PBB Law § 22 — New York Code / Act PBB / Article 2 / Section 22
When appropriations are available; appropriations for two or more objects
Status: in_force

§ 22.  When appropriations are available; appropriations for two or\nmore objects.  No item of an appropriation made for the performance of\nsuch work shall be available, except for advertising or expenses\nincurred in the preparation of plans and specifications, engineering\nwork or superintendence, unless one or more contracts or special orders\nshall first have been made for the completion of such work within the\nappropriation therefor.  If an appropriation be made for the\nconstruction, reconstruction, alteration, repair or improvement of any\nstate buildings in an appropriation act specifying two or more objects\nfor which the appropriation is made and any one of such objects shall\nhave been accomplished for a sum less than the amount specified in the\nact, the unexpended balance shall be applicable to any other work\nspecified in the act.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 195.06-A — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title L / Article 195 / Section 195.06-A
Killing a police work dog or police work horse
Status: in_force

§ 195.06-a Killing a police work dog or police work horse.\n  A person is guilty of killing a police work dog or police work horse\nwhen such person intentionally kills a police work dog or police work\nhorse while such dog or horse is in the performance of its duties and\nunder the supervision of a police officer. For purposes of this section,\n"police work dog" or "police work horse," as the case may be, shall mean\nany dog or horse owned or harbored by any state or municipal police\ndepartment or any state or federal law enforcement agency, which has\nbeen trained to aid law enforcement officers and is actually being used\nfor police work purposes.\n  Killing a police work dog or police work horse is a class E felony.\n
N.Y. CVR Law § 79-P*2 — New York Code / Act CVR / Article 7 / Section 79-P*2
Gender neutral single-occupancy bathroom facilities
Status: in_force

* § 79-p. Gender neutral single-occupancy bathroom facilities. 1. All\nsingle-occupancy bathroom facilities located in public places, including\nbut not limited to those located in restaurants, bars, mercantile\nestablishments, or factories, shall be designated as gender neutral for\nuse by no more than one occupant at a time or for family or assisted\nuse. For purposes of this section, "single-occupancy bathroom" shall\nhave the same meaning as paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section one\nhundred forty-five of the public buildings law.\n  2. Such gender neutral bathroom facilities shall be clearly designated\nby the posting of such on or near the entry door of each facility.\n  * NB There are 2 § 79-p's\n
N.Y. STF Law § 97-CCCC*4 — New York Code / Act STF / Article 6 / Section 97-CCCC*4
Erie canal museum fund
Status: in_force

* § 97-cccc. Erie canal museum fund. 1. There is hereby established in\nthe joint custody of the state comptroller and the commissioner of\ntaxation and finance a fund to be known as the Erie canal museum fund.\n  2. Such fund shall consist of all moneys collected pursuant to section\nfour hundred four-u of the vehicle and traffic law, and all other moneys\ncredited or transferred thereto from any other fund or source pursuant\nto law, provided that section four hundred four-u of the vehicle and\ntraffic law shall control the method of payment for the costs of\nproducing the distinctive license plates authorized pursuant to such\nsection of law.\n  3. Moneys of the fund shall be expended for the benefit of the\nprograms of the Erie Canal Museum, Inc. Moneys shall be paid out of the\nfund on the audit and warrant of the state comptroller on vouchers\napproved by the chairman of the board of trustees of the Erie Canal\nMuseum, Inc. Any interest received by the comptroller on moneys on\ndeposit in the Erie canal museum fund shall be retained in and become\npart of such fund. No money from such fund may be withdrawn,\ntransferred, or used by any person for any purpose other than as\npermitted by this section.\n  * NB There are 4 § 97-cccc's\n
N.Y. MIL Law § 130.102 — New York Code / Act MIL / Article 7 / Part 10 / Section 130.102
False official statements
Status: in_force

§ 130.102. False official statements.  Any person subject to this code\nwho, with intent to deceive, signs any false record, return, regulation,\norder, or other official document, knowing the same to be false, or\nmakes any other false official statement knowing the same to be false,\nshall be punished as a court-martial may direct.\n
N.Y. TCP Law § 89 — New York Code / Act TCP / Article 7 / Section 89
Over state lands
Status: in_force

§ 89. Over state lands. The commissioner of general services shall\nhave power to grant to any pipe line corporation any lands belonging to\nthe people of this state which may be required for the purposes of its\nincorporation on such terms as may be agreed, or such corporation may\nacquire title thereto by condemnation, except that no corporation may\ncondemn any lands for the purposes of the construction of any line of\npipe that supports facilities or infrastructure associated with\nexploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas in the\nnorth Atlantic planning area, and further excepting that no pipe line\ncorporation may condemn any canal lands abandoned pursuant to the\nprovisions of article four of the public lands law until after they have\nbeen sold and conveyed in the manner provided by the public lands law.\nIf any lands owned by any county, city or town be required by such\ncorporation for such purposes, the county, city or town officers having\ncharge of such lands may grant them to the corporation upon terms and\ncompensation agreed upon.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 680.30 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 3 / Title S / Article 680 / Section 680.30
Examination of witnesses on commission; application by people for examination of witnesses
Status: in_force

§ 680.30  Examination of witnesses on commission; application by people\n             for examination of witnesses.\n  1.  Upon granting the defendant's application for issuance of a\ncommission, the court may, upon application of the people, determine\nthat the commission shall also authorize examination of a person or\npersons designated by the people, who reside in the jurisdiction in\nwhich the examination proceeding is to occur, if it is satisfied that\nsuch person or persons possess material information, reside outside the\nstate and otherwise meet the standards for examination of witnesses on a\ncommission as prescribed in subdivision one of section 680.20.\n  2.  Such application and the moving papers must be in writing, must be\nsubscribed and sworn to by the district attorney, and copies thereof\nmust be served upon the defendant and his attorney, with reasonable\nnotice and opportunity to be heard.  The moving papers must contain all\nof the allegations required upon a defendant's application, as specified\nin subdivision two of section 680.20.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 209-C — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 12 / Section 209-C
Registration of identical, similar or misleading names prohibited
Status: in_force

§ 209-c. Registration of identical, similar or misleading names\nprohibited. The secretary of state shall not record, register or file\nany name or designation identical with or similar to any other name or\ndesignation filed or registered as herein provided as would be\ncalculated to deceive or mislead the public, unless such prior\nregistration shall have been revoked as herein provided. The supreme\ncourt may, in an action brought for that purpose by any person or\ncorporation aggrieved thereby against any other person or corporation\nwho or which has already filed or registered any such name or\ndesignation, direct the revocation of any such registration where it\nshall be determined that the person who has already registered the same\nhas not the right to use such name or designation because of the prior\nuse thereof by another.  No person other than the proprietor of such\nname or designation, which has been filed in the office of the secretary\nof state and in the office of the county clerk, as aforesaid, shall,\nwithout the written consent of such proprietor, in any manner\nwhatsoever, either directly or indirectly, use such name or designation,\nor any other name or designation for the name of an hotel or motel in\nthe state of New York which may be so similar as to deceive or mislead\nthe public. Any person or corporation may assign to any other person or\ncorporation all right, title and interest in, to and under the aforesaid\ncertificate of the secretary of state. Nonuse of the name or designation\ndescribed in any certificate of the secretary of state for the period of\none year shall operate as an abandonment of the right to use such name\nor designation thereafter.\n
N.Y. CPL Law § 60.40 — New York Code / Act CPL / Part 1 / Title D / Article 60 / Section 60.40
Rules of evidence; proof of previous conviction; when allowed
Status: in_force

§ 60.40  Rules of evidence; proof of previous conviction; when allowed.\n  1.  If in the course of a criminal proceeding, any witness, including\na defendant, is properly asked whether he was previously convicted of a\nspecified offense and answers in the negative or in an equivocal manner,\nthe party adverse to the one who called him may independently prove such\nconviction.  If in response to proper inquiry whether he has ever been\nconvicted of any offense the witness answers in the negative or in an\nequivocal manner, the adverse party may independently prove any previous\nconviction of the witness.\n  2.  If a defendant in a criminal proceeding, through the testimony of\na witness called by him, offers evidence of his good character, the\npeople may independently prove any previous conviction of the defendant\nfor an offense the commission of which would tend to negate any\ncharacter trait or quality attributed to the defendant in such witness'\ntestimony.\n  3.  Subject to the limitations prescribed in section 200.60, the\npeople may prove that a defendant has been previously convicted of an\noffense when the fact of such previous conviction constitutes an element\nof the offense charged, or proof thereof is otherwise essential to the\nestablishment of a legally sufficient case.\n
N.Y. WKC Law § 95 — New York Code / Act WKC / Article 6 / Section 95
Record and audit of payrolls
Status: in_force

§ 95. Record and audit of payrolls.  (1) Every employer who is insured\nin the state insurance fund shall keep a true and accurate record of the\nnumber of his employees and the wages paid by him, and shall furnish,\nupon demand, a sworn statement of the same.  Such record shall be open\nto inspection at any time and as often as may be necessary to verify the\nnumber of employees and the amount of the payroll.  Any employer who\nshall fail to keep such record, who shall willfully fail to furnish such\nrecord or who shall willfully falsify any such record, shall be guilty\nof a misdemeanor.\n  (2) Employers subject to subdivision (e) of section two thousand three\nhundred four of the insurance law and subdivision two of section\neighty-nine of this article shall keep a true and accurate record of\nhours worked for all construction classification employees. The willful\nfailure to keep such record, or the knowing falsification of any such\nrecord, may be prosecuted as insurance fraud in accordance with the\nprovisions of section 176.05 of the penal law.\n
N.Y. LEG Law § 72 — New York Code / Act LEG / Article 4-A / Section 72
Purposes of commission
Status: in_force

§ 72. Purposes of commission. It shall be the duty of the law revision\ncommission:\n  1. To examine the common law and statutes of the state and current\njudicial decisions for the purpose of discovering defects and\nanachronisms in the law and recommending needed reforms.\n  2. To receive and consider proposed changes in the law recommended by\nthe American law institute, the commissioners for the promotion of\nuniformity of legislation in the United States, any bar association or\nother learned bodies.\n  3. To receive and consider suggestions from judges, justices, public\nofficials, lawyers and the public generally as to defects and\nanachronisms in the law.\n  4. To recommend, from time to time, such changes in the law as it\ndeems necessary to modify or eliminate antiquated and inequitable rules\nof law, and to bring the law of this state, civil and criminal, into\nharmony with modern conditions.\n  5. To report its proceedings annually to the legislature on or before\nFebruary first, and, if it deems advisable, to accompany its report with\nproposed bills to carry out any of its recommendations.\n
N.Y. CVR Law § 22 — New York Code / Act CVR / Article 3 / Section 22
Privilege of officers and prisoner from arrest while passing through another county
Status: in_force

§ 22. Privilege of officers and prisoner from arrest while passing\nthrough another county. A prisoner conveyed to jail through another\ncounty by a sheriff or other officer pursuant to law, or the officer\nhaving him in custody, is not liable to arrest in any civil action or\nspecial proceeding, while passing through another county.\n