FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. PBH Law § 2994-II — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 29-CCCC / Section 2994-II
Definitions
Status: in_force

§ 2994-ii. Definitions. When used in this article, the following words\nor phrases shall have the following meanings:\n  1. "Hospital" shall mean any "general hospital" as defined in section\ntwenty-eight hundred one of this chapter.\n  2. "After-care" shall mean any assistance provided by a caregiver to a\npatient under this article after the patient's discharge from a hospital\nthat is related to the patient's condition at the time of discharge.\nSuch assistance shall include, but is not limited to, assisting with\nbasic activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of\ndaily living (IADLs), and other tasks as determined to be appropriate by\nthe discharging physician.\n  3. "Caregiver" shall mean any individual duly identified as a\ncaregiver by a patient under this article who provides after-care\nassistance to a patient living in his or her residence. An identified\ncaregiver shall include, but is not limited to, a relative, partner,\nfriend or neighbor who has a significant relationship with the patient.\n  4. "Discharge" shall mean a patient's exit or release from a hospital\nto the patient's residence following an inpatient admission.\n  5. "Entry" shall mean a patient's admission into a hospital for the\npurposes of receiving inpatient care.\n  6. "Patient" shall mean a patient eighteen years of age or older.\n  7. "Residence" shall mean a dwelling that the patient considers to be\nhis or her home. A "residence" for the purposes of this article shall\nnot include any rehabilitation facility, hospital, nursing home,\nassisted living facility, group home or other residential health care\nfacility as defined in section twenty-eight hundred one of this chapter\nor any inpatient facility regulated by the office of mental health.\n
N.Y. PBS Law § 68-A — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 4 / Section 68-A
Statements of nature and extent of interests to be filed upon request
Status: in_force

§ 68-a. Statements of nature and extent of interests to be filed upon\nrequest.  Whenever any person or corporation signs or certifies any\nestimate, appraisal, report, or other statement, to be submitted to the\npublic service commission in relation to any public utility company, in\nwhich such person or corporation is or has been financially interested,\ndirectly or indirectly, or is or has been employed in any manner or\ncapacity, or of which such person is or has been an officer or employee,\nthe commission in its discretion, may require that such signature or\ncertification shall be accompanied by a specific statement setting forth\nthe nature and extent of such interest or engagement.\n
N.Y. RAT Law § 57 — New York Code / Act RAT / Article 6 / Section 57
Procedure in case property is situated in two or more counties
Status: in_force

§ 57. Procedure in case property is situated in two or more counties.\nIf the property to be acquired or extinguished in any proceeding be\nsituated in two or more counties, the maps or plans and memoranda\nrequired to be filed by section fifty-four of this chapter shall be so\nfiled in the respective offices therein provided in each county in which\nsuch property or any part thereof is situated, and the application to\ncondemn such property may be made to the supreme court at any special\nterm thereof held in any judicial district in which any one of such\ncounties is situated. If the property to be acquired or extinguished in\nany proceeding be situated in two judicial districts the application to\ncondemn such property may be made in either judicial district. The order\ngranting the application to condemn in any such proceeding shall be\nentered, and the final decree therein shall be filed in the office of\nthe clerk of any one of the counties in which a part of the property to\nbe thereby acquired or extinguished is situated, as directed by the\ncourt, and a certified copy of the order granting the application to\ncondemn and a certified copy of the final decree shall be filed in the\noffice in which instruments affecting real property are required to be\nrecorded in each county in which any part of the property thereby\nacquired or extinguished is situated. In all other respects the\nproceeding shall be conducted in the same manner as a proceeding\naffecting property situated in only one county.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 460.22 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 4 / Title X / Article 460 / Section 460.22
Aggravated enterprise corruption
Status: in_force

§ 460.22 Aggravated enterprise corruption.\n  A person is guilty of aggravated enterprise corruption when he or she\ncommits the crime of enterprise corruption and two or more of the acts\nthat constitute his or her pattern of criminal activity are class B\nfelonies or higher, and at least two acts are armed felonies as defined\nin paragraph (a) of subdivision forty-one of section 1.20 of the\ncriminal procedure law or one act is such an armed felony and one act is\na violation of subdivision two of section 265.17 of this chapter or one\nact is a class B violent felony and two are violations of subdivision\ntwo of section 265.17 of this chapter.\n  Aggravated enterprise corruption is a class A-I felony.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 1020 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 41 / Section 1020
Subpoenas by commission; oaths
Status: in_force

§ 1020. Subpoenas by commission; oaths. The commission shall have\nauthority to issue, under the hand of its chairperson, and the seal of\nthe commission, subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses before the\ncommission. A subpoena issued under this section shall be regulated by\nthe civil practice law and rules.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 165.16 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title J / Article 165 / Section 165.16
Unauthorized sale of certain transportation services
Status: in_force

§ 165.16 Unauthorized sale of certain transportation services.\n  1. A person is guilty of unauthorized sale of certain transportation\nservices when, with intent to avoid payment by another person to the\nmetropolitan transportation authority, New York city transit authority\nor a subsidiary or affiliate of either such authority of the lawful\ncharge for transportation services on a railroad, subway, bus or mass\ntransit service operated by either such authority or a subsidiary or\naffiliate thereof, he or she, in exchange for value, sells access to\nsuch transportation services to such person, without authorization,\nthrough the use of an unlimited farecard or doctored farecard. This\nsection shall apply only to such sales that occur in a transportation\nfacility, as such term is defined in subdivision two of section 240.00\nof this chapter, operated by such metropolitan transportation authority,\nNew York city transit authority or subsidiary or affiliate of such\nauthority, when public notice of the prohibitions of its section and the\nexemptions thereto appears on the face of the farecard or is\nconspicuously posted in transportation facilities operated by such\nmetropolitan transportation authority, New York city transit authority\nor such subsidiary or affiliate of such authority.\n  2. It shall be a defense to a prosecution under this section that a\nperson, firm, partnership, corporation, or association: (a) selling a\nfarecard containing value, other than a doctored farecard, relinquished\nall rights and privileges thereto upon consummation of the sale; or (b)\nsold access to transportation services through the use of a farecard,\nother than a doctored farecard, when such sale was made at the request\nof the purchaser as an accommodation to the purchaser at a time when a\nfarecard was not immediately available to the purchaser, provided,\nhowever, that the seller lawfully acquired the farecard and did not, by\nmeans of an unlawful act, contribute to the circumstances that caused\nthe purchaser to make such request.\n  3. For purposes of this section:\n  (a) "farecard" means a value-based, magnetically encoded card\ncontaining stored monetary value from which a specified amount of value\nis deducted as payment of a fare;\n  (b) "unlimited farecard" means a farecard that is time-based,\nmagnetically encoded and which permits entrance an unlimited number of\ntimes into facilities and conveyances for a specified period of time;\nand\n  (c) "doctored farecard" means a farecard that has been bent or\nmanipulated or altered so as to facilitate a person's access to\ntransportation services without paying the lawful charge.\n  Unauthorized sale of transportation service is a class B misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 462 — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 4-A / Section 462
Application of article
Status: in_force

§ 462. Application of article. 1. This article shall not apply to or\naffect a physician duly licensed under article one hundred thirty-one of\nthe education law or x-ray technicians.\n  2. This article shall not apply to, affect, or restrict the ability of\na city, town, village, or county to enact a local law or ordinance\nprohibiting or restricting body piercing or tattooing within such city,\ntown, village or county.\n  3. Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to limit the\nduty or power of an officer to act with regard to an immediate threat to\nthe health of the customers of a body piercing specialist or tattooist\nor body piercing studio or tattoo studio or the community in which it is\nlocated, or to alter or abridge any of the duties and powers now or\nhereafter existing in the commissioner, state district health officers,\ncounty boards of health, county commissioners of health or local boards\nof health.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 822 — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 23-A / Section 822
Authorization and standards for allowances
Status: in_force

§ 822. Authorization and standards for allowances.  The commissioner,\nin accordance with standards established by him, may pay to a person\nenrolled in such courses, training, subsistence, and transportation\nallowances. In setting standards for:\n  1. training allowances, the commissioner shall consider the relative\nneeds of the trainees, wages earned by them, and benefits payable to\nthem under the general provisions of article eighteen of this chapter,\nprovided, however, that no training allowance shall exceed by more than\nten dollars the average statewide gross benefit rate under such article\nfor a week of total unemployment during the most recent\nfour-calendar-quarter period for which such data are available,\naugmented by five dollars a week for each dependent over two up to a\nmaximum of four additional dependents.\n  2. subsistence allowances, the commissioner shall consider the cost to\nthe trainees of living away from their normal residences where this is\nnecessitated by the location and nature of the training facilities,\nprovided, however, that no such allowance shall exceed five dollars a\nday.\n  3. transportation allowances, the commissioner shall consider the cost\nto the trainees of commuting and long-distance travel necessitated by\nthe nature and location of the training facilities.\n
N.Y. JUD Law § 43 — New York Code / Act JUD / Article 2-A / Section 43
Panels; referees
Status: in_force

§ 43. Panels; referees. 1. The commission may delegate any of its\nfunctions, powers and duties to a panel of three of its members, one of\nwhom shall be a member of the bar, except that no panel shall confer\nimmunity in accordance with section 50.20 of the criminal procedure law.\nNo panel shall be authorized to take any action pursuant to subdivisions\nfour through eight of section forty-four of this article or subdivision\ntwo of this section.\n  2. The commission may designate a member of the bar who is not a judge\nor a member of the commission or its staff as a referee to hear and\nreport to the commission in accordance with the provisions of section\nforty-four of this article.  Such referee shall be empowered to conduct\nhearings, administer oaths or affirmations, subpoena witnesses, compel\ntheir attendance, examine them under oath or affirmation and require the\nproduction of any books, records, documents or other evidence that the\nreferee may deem relevant or material to the subject of the hearing.\n
N.Y. BSC Law § 1117 — New York Code / Act BSC / Article 11 / Section 1117
Applicability of other provisions
Status: in_force

§ 1117. Applicability of other provisions.\n  (a) Subject to the provisions of this article, the provisions of\nsections 1005 (Procedure after dissolution), 1006 (Corporate action and\nsurvival of remedies after dissolution), 1007 (Notice to creditors;\nfiling or barring claims) and 1008 (Jurisdiction of supreme court to\nsupervise dissolution and liquidation) shall apply to a corporation\ndissolved under this article.\n  (b) Any orders provided for in section 1008, may be made at any stage\nof an action or special proceeding for dissolution of a corporation\nunder this article, and if the corporation is dissolved under this\narticle, the court may retain jurisdiction for the purpose of making\nsuch orders, after the dissolution, in such action or special\nproceeding.  The court may also make such orders in separate special\nproceedings, as provided in section 1008.\n  (c) Notice to creditors and claimants, provided for in section 1007,\nmay also be given, by order of the court, at any stage of an action or\nspecial proceeding for dissolution of a corporation under this article.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 438 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 4 / Part 3 / Section 438
Counsel fees
Status: in_force

§ 438. Counsel fees. (a) In any proceeding under this article,\nincluding proceedings for support of a spouse and children, or for\nsupport of children only, or at any hearing to modify or enforce an\norder entered in that proceeding or a proceeding to modify a decree of\ndivorce, separation, or annulment, including an appeal under article\neleven, the court may allow counsel fees at any stage of the proceeding,\nto the attorney representing the spouse, former spouse or person on\nbehalf of children.\n  (b) In any proceeding for failure to obey any lawful order compelling\npayment of support of a spouse or former spouse and children, or of\nchildren only, the court shall, upon a finding that such failure was\nwillful, order respondent to pay counsel fees to the attorney\nrepresenting the petitioner or person on behalf of the children.\nRepresentation by an attorney pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision\nnine of section one hundred eleven-b of the social services law shall\nnot preclude an award of counsel fees to an applicant which would\notherwise be allowed under this section.\n
N.Y. CVP Law § 5531 — New York Code / Act CVP / Article 55 / Section 5531
Description of action
Status: in_force

Rule 5531. Description of action. The appellant shall file together\nwith the record on appeal, in both criminal and civil actions, a\nstatement containing the following information listed and numbered in\nthe following order:\n  1. the index number of the case in the court below,\n  2. the full names of the original parties and any change in the\nparties,\n  3. the court and county in which the action was commenced,\n  4. the date the action was commenced and the dates on which each\npleading was served,\n  5. a brief description of the nature and object of the action,\n  6. a statement as to whether the appeal is from a judgment or an order\nor both, the dates of entry of each judgment or order appealed from, and\nthe name of the judge or justice who directed the entry of the judgment\nor made the order being appealed, and\n  7. a statement as to the method of appeal being used:\n  (a) whether the appeal is on a full record, printed or reproduced, or\n  (b) on the original record, in which event, state whether the appendix\nmethod is being used, or leave to prosecute the appeal on the original\nrecord was granted by the court or by statute.\n  The statement shall be prefixed to the papers constituting the record\non appeal. A copy of this statement shall be filed with the clerk at the\ntime the record on appeal is filed.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 2015 — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 20-C / Section 2015
Definitions
Status: in_force

* § 2015. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms\nshall have the following meanings:\n  1. "Frontotemporal degeneration disorders" or "FTD disorders" means a\ngroup of clinical disorders caused by progressive nerve cell loss in the\nbrain's frontal lobes and/or temporal lobes which can lead to loss of\nfunction in these brain regions, which variably cause deterioration in\nbehavior, personality and/or difficulty with producing or comprehending\nlanguage, as well as loss of motor control and movement. For the\npurposes of this title frontotemporal degeneration disorders is the same\nas "FTD" and includes, but is not limited to behavioral variant FTD,\nprimary progressive aphasia, corticobasal syndrome, and progressive\nsupranuclear palsy. Some individuals with FTD may also be diagnosed with\nALS.\n  2. "Dementia" means a usually progressive condition marked by the\ndevelopment of multiple cognitive deficits, which may include but is not\nexclusive to memory impairment, aphasia, and the inability to plan and\ninitiate complex behavior. Dementia has numerous different causes\nincluding but not limited to FTD, Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body\nDementia and Vascular Dementia.\n
N.Y. FCT Law § 154 — New York Code / Act FCT / Article 1 / Part 5 / Section 154
State-wide process
Status: in_force

§ 154. State-wide process. (a) The family court may send process or\nother mandates in any matter in which it has jurisdiction into any\ncounty of the state for service or execution in like manner and with the\nsame force and effect as similar process or mandates of county courts as\nprovided by law.\n  (b) In a proceeding to establish paternity or to establish, modify or\nenforce support, the court may send process without the state in the\nsame manner and with the same effect as process sent within the state in\nthe exercise of personal jurisdiction over any person subject to the\njurisdiction of the court under section three hundred one or three\nhundred two of the civil practice law and rules or under section 580-201\nof article five-B of the family court act, notwithstanding that such\nperson is not a resident or domiciliary of the state.\n  (c) In a proceeding arising under article four, five, six, eight or\nten of this act in which an order of protection is sought or in which a\nviolation of an order of protection is alleged, the court may send\nprocess without the state in the same manner and with the same effect as\nprocess sent within the state in the exercise of personal jurisdiction\nover any person, subject to the jurisdiction of the court under section\nthree hundred one or three hundred two of the civil practice law and\nrules, notwithstanding that such person is not a resident or domiciliary\nof the state, so long as: (1) the act or acts giving rise to the\napplication for issuance or enforcement of the order of protection\noccurred within the state; and (2) the applicant for the order of\nprotection resides or is domiciled in the state or has substantial\ncontacts in the state, including but not limited to, presence on a\nregular basis in the state. Upon good cause shown, the court may issue a\ntemporary order of protection in accordance with article four, five,\nsix, eight or ten of this act. Where personal jurisdiction over a\nnon-resident or non-domiciliary respondent would not be obtainable but\nfor this subdivision, the papers to be served shall include a\nconspicuous notice that the exercise of such jurisdiction is limited to\nthe issue of the order of protection. Where service of a petition and\nsummons upon a non-resident or non-domiciliary respondent is required,\nsuch service shall be made at least twenty days before the return date.\nWhere service is effected on an out-of-state respondent and the\nrespondent defaults by failing to appear, the court may on its own\nmotion, or upon application of any party or the attorney for the child,\nproceed to a hearing with respect to issuance or enforcement of the\norder of protection. Nothing in this section shall be construed to\naffect or alter the exercise of personal jurisdiction with respect to\nissues other than the order of protection.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 1449-O — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 31-C / Section 1449-O
Refunds
Status: in_force

§ 1449-o. Refunds. Whenever the treasurer shall determine that any\nmoneys received under the provisions of the local law enacted pursuant\nto this article were paid in error, it may cause such moneys to be\nrefunded pursuant to such rules and regulations it may prescribe,\nprovided any application for such refund is filed with the treasurer\nwithin two years from the date the erroneous payment was made.\n
N.Y. PVH Law § 111-B — New York Code / Act PVH / Article 5 / Section 111-B
Mortgage modification provisions for redevelopment companies in cities with a population of one million or more
Status: in_force

§ 111-b. Mortgage modification provisions for redevelopment companies\nin cities with a population of one million or more. 1. For purposes of\nthis section, "restrictive agreement" shall mean a binding and\nirrevocable agreement between the redevelopment company and the\nsupervising agency providing that such redevelopment company for a term\nof five years from the date of such agreement (i) shall not voluntarily\ndissolve or reconstitute pursuant to section one hundred twenty-three of\nthis article, (ii) shall exercise any and all available options to renew\nany housing assistance payments contract pursuant to section eight of\nthe United States Housing Act of nineteen hundred thirty-seven, as\namended, and any successor rent subsidy program, (iii) shall not cause\nsuch a contract to be terminated by reason of such redevelopment\ncompany's noncompliance with any of the terms thereof, and (iv) shall\nnot voluntarily cause or permit such a contract to expire, to not be\nextended, to not be renewed, or to be terminated.\n  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of this article or the provisions of\nany law, general or special, in cities with a population of one million\nor more, a redevelopment company with a federally-aided mortgage formed\npursuant to this article may borrow funds and secure the repayment\nthereof by note and mortgage or any other manner approved by the\nsupervising agency, provided, however, that (a) such approval by the\nsupervising agency shall be conditioned upon a restrictive agreement,\nand (b) such redevelopment company may not increase the rents paid by\nthe tenants to pay for any such increase in indebtedness that is not\nattributable to project cost.\n
N.Y. UJC Law § 1906 — New York Code / Act UJC / Article 19 / Section 1906
Costs allowed by court
Status: in_force

§ 1906. Costs allowed by court.\n  The court may in its discretion impose costs not exceeding five\ndollars in the following cases:\n  (a) Upon granting or denying a motion.\n  (b) Upon allowing an amendment of a pleading.\n  (c) Upon adjournment of a trial.\n
N.Y. AGM Law § 205 — New York Code / Act AGM / Article 17 / Section 205
Defining honey
Status: in_force

§ 205. Defining honey.  The terms "honey," "liquid or extracted\nhoney," "strained honey," or "pure honey," as used in this article,\nshall mean the nectar of flowers that has been transformed by, and is\nthe natural product of the honey-bee, taken from the honeycomb and\nmarketed in a liquid, candied or granulated condition.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 359-C — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 23-A / Section 359-C
Publication of state notices
Status: in_force

§ 359-c. Publication of state notices. 1. Every state notice filed in\nthe department of state pursuant to this article shall be published by\nsuch department in the next issue of the state bulletin following the\nreceipt thereof, except that a notice received by the department less\nthan five days before the next issue may be published either in such\nnext issue or the next issue but one, at the convenience and in the\ndiscretion of such department.\n  2. The department of state shall collect a fee of seventy-five dollars\nfor filing and publishing each state notice and each further state\nnotice.\n