FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
N.Y. PBS Law § 102 — New York Code / Act PBS / Article 5 / Section 102
IntraLATA presubscribed interexchange carrier-change charge study
Status: in_force

§ 102. IntraLATA presubscribed interexchange carrier-change charge\nstudy. 1. As used in this section, the following terms have the\nfollowing meanings:\n  (a) "Provider of telephone service" means a telephone corporation that\nprovides intraLATA or local exchange telephone service to end-use\ncustomers.\n  (b) "Customer change of use charges" means intraLATA presubscribed\ninterexchange carrier-change charges, that any provider of residential\nor single-line business telephone service levies upon the customer for\nthe customer's change in intraLATA presubscribed interexchange carrier\nservice or complete termination of that service.\n  (c) "Customer local calling plan" means any residential or single-line\nbusiness telephone plan, exclusively for the purpose of completing\nregional intraLATA calls, offered by any telegraph corporation or\ntelephone corporation, subject to section ninety of this article.\n  2. The commission shall conduct a study to analyze trends associated\nwith customer change of use charges related to changes of a customer's\nlocal calling plan and determine the extent to which these changes take\nplace and the actual cost for a provider of telephone service to make\nall the necessary changes associated with such a change. From its\nfindings, the commission shall publish a report regarding the activity\nrelated to changes in local calling plans and the costs associated with\nthe changes of such plans. The report must be published within one\nhundred twenty days of the effective date of this section. A copy of the\nreport must be furnished to the temporary president of the senate, the\nspeaker of the assembly, the chairperson of the senate standing\ncommittee on energy and telecommunications, and the chairperson of the\nassembly standing committee on corporations, authorities and\ncommissions.\n  3. In cases where the customer's calling plan was altered by, or on\nbehalf of, a telegraph corporation and/or telephone corporation subject\nto section ninety of this article, other than the customer's provider of\ntelephone service, the telegraph corporation or telephone corporation\nshall pay the customer change of use charges to the provider of\ntelephone service.\n  4. The commission shall notify customers of its findings on its\nofficial world wide web website.\n
N.Y. YTS Law § 15-107 — New York Code / Act YTS / Article 9 / Section 15-107
Enforcement with other taxes
Status: in_force

§ 15-107. Enforcement with other taxes.\n  A. Joint assessments. If there is assessed a tax under a city income\ntax surcharge imposed pursuant to this article and there is also\nassessed a tax against the same taxpayer pursuant to Article 22 of the\nNew York State Tax Law or under a local law enacted pursuant to the\nauthority of Article 30 or 30-B of the New York State Tax Law or Article\n2-E of the General City Law and payment of a single amount is required\nunder the provisions of this article, such payment shall be deemed to\nhave been made with respect to the taxes so assessed in proportion to\nthe amounts of such taxes due, including tax penalties, interest and\nadditions to tax.\n  B. Joint action. If the State Tax Commission takes action under such\nArticle 22 or under a local law enacted pursuant to the authority of\nArticle 30 or 30-B of the New York State Tax Law or Article 2-E of the\nGeneral City Law with respect to the enforcement and collection of the\ntax or taxes assessed under such articles, the State Tax Commission\nshall, wherever possible, accompany such action with a similar action\nunder similar enforcement and collection provisions of the City of\nYonkers income tax surcharge.\n  C. Apportionment of moneys collected by joint action. Any moneys\ncollected as a result of such joint action shall be deemed to have been\ncollected in proportion to the amounts due, including tax, penalties,\ninterest and additions to tax, under Article 22 of the New York State\nTax Law or under a local law enacted pursuant to the authority of\nArticle 30 or 30-B of the New York State Tax Law or Article 2-E of the\nGeneral City Law and the City of Yonkers Income Tax Surcharge Law.\n  D. Joint deficiency action. Whenever the State Tax Commission takes\nany action with respect to a deficiency of income tax under Article 22\nof the New York State Tax Law or under a local law enacted pursuant to\nthe authority of Article 30 or 30-B of the New York State Tax Law or\nArticle 2-E of the General City Law, other than the action set forth in\nSubsection A of this section, it may, in its discretion, accompany such\naction with a similar action under the City of Yonkers City Income Tax\nSurcharge Law.\n
N.Y. MIL Law § 13-C — New York Code / Act MIL / Article 1 / Section 13-C
Assistant adjutant general for army
Status: in_force

§ 13-c. Assistant adjutant general for army.  The governor, upon the\nrecommendation of the adjutant general, may appoint an assistant\nadjutant general for army who shall serve at the pleasure of the\ngovernor. He shall be appointed by the governor from among the\ncommissioned officers on the active list of the army national guard and,\nwhile holding such title, shall have the grade of brigadier general\nduring his term of office. He shall have such duties as may be\nprescribed by the adjutant general.\n
N.Y. CCA Law § 1102 — New York Code / Act CCA / Article 11 / Section 1102
Implied admissions
Status: in_force

§ 1102. Implied admissions. The following provisions governing matters\ndeemed admitted and the imposition of additional costs for unreasonable\ndenials shall be applicable in this court.\n  (a) Ownership, operation or control of:\n  1. Vehicle. In an action for negligence arising from the ownership,\noperation or control of a vehicle required to be registered or licensed,\nwhere the pleading containing the cause of action states the\nregistration or license number of such vehicle, the pleader need not\nprove upon the trial the ownership, operation or control of such vehicle\nby the other party and the same shall be deemed admitted, unless\nspecifically denied in the responsive pleading.\n  2. Streetcar or bus. In an action for negligence arising from the\nownership, operation or control of any streetcar or omnibus in the state\nof New York, where the pleading containing the cause of action states\nthe avenue or street upon which the said streetcar or omnibus was\noperated, the place where the accident occurred, and the number of the\nstreetcar or omnibus or the name or number of any of the employees\noperating the said streetcar or omnibus at the time in question, the\npleader need not prove upon the trial the ownership, operation or\ncontrol of the particular streetcar or omnibus by the other party and\nthe same shall be deemed admitted, unless specifically denied in the\nresponsive pleading.\n  3. Building. In an action for negligence arising from the ownership,\noperation or control of any building, dwelling or tenement house, where\nthe pleading containing the cause of action states the full address of\nthe building, dwelling or tenement house and the date when the acts\ncomplained of took place, the pleader need not prove upon the trial the\nownership, operation or control of such building, dwelling or tenement\nhouse by the other party and the same shall be deemed admitted, unless\nspecifically denied in the responsive pleading.\n  (b) Signature. A signature to a written instrument which is pleaded\nshall be deemed genuine unless the other party, in his responsive\npleading, specifically denies its genuineness and makes demand that it\nbe proved.\n  (c) Corporate existence. In an action by or against a corporation\norganized or authorized to do business pursuant to the laws of the state\nof New York, the existence of such corporation shall be deemed admitted\nunless specifically denied in the responsive pleading.\n  (d) In the event of the unreasonable or unjustifiable denial of any of\nthe matters contained in subdivisions (a), (b) or (c), and the\nsatisfactory proof thereof, upon trial, by the party who pleaded them,\nthe court may allow such party, if he prevails in the action, additional\ncosts not to exceed twenty-five dollars for each such denial.\n
N.Y. UCT Law § 1912 — New York Code / Act UCT / Article 19 / Section 1912
Actions in which no fees to be charged; employees
Status: in_force

§ 1912. Actions in which no fees to be charged; employees.\n  Employee's action. When the action is brought by an employee against\nan employer for services performed by such employee, the clerk shall not\ndemand or receive any fees whatsoever from the plaintiff or his\nattorney, if the plaintiff shall present proof by his own affidavit that\nhis demand does not exceed three hundred dollars exclusive of interest\nand costs; that he is a resident of or an employee in the county; that\nhe has a good and meritorious cause of action against the defendant and\nthe nature thereof; and that he has made either a written or a personal\ndemand upon the defendant or his agent for payment thereof and payment\nwas refused; provided that if the plaintiff shall demand a trial by\njury, he must pay to the clerk the fees therefor.\n
N.Y. HHC Law § 11 — New York Code / Act HHC / Section 11
Moneys of the corporation
Status: in_force

§ 11. Moneys of the corporation. 1. Any moneys of the corporation,\nfrom whatever source derived, shall, except as otherwise provided in\nthis act, be deposited as soon as practicable in banks or trust\ncompanies organized under the laws of the state or national banking\nassociation doing business in the city designated by the board. The said\nmoneys of the corporation shall be paid out on checks signed by the\nchairman of the board or by such other person or persons as the board\nshall authorize. All deposits of such moneys shall, if required by the\nboard, be secured by obligations of the United States or of the state or\nof the city of a market value equal at all times to the amount of the\ndeposits and all banks and trust companies are authorized to give such\nsecurity for such deposits.\n  2. Subject to the terms of any contract, lease or other agreement\nundertaken by the corporation, any such moneys of the corporation not\nrequired for immediate use may, at the discretion of the board, be\ninvested by the corporation in obligations of the United States, the\nstate or the city or in obligations the principal and interest of which\nare guaranteed by the United States, the state or the city.\n  3. The comptroller, or his legally authorized representative, is\nhereby authorized to and shall examine annually the accounts and books\nof the corporation including its receipts, disbursements, contracts,\nreserves, sinking funds, investments and any other matters relating to\nits financial operation and standing.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 129-A — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 6 / Section 129-A
Erie county; county hospital superintendent and county hospital board of managers
Status: in_force

§ 129-a. Erie county; county hospital superintendent and county\nhospital board of managers.  In the county of Erie, the county executive\nwhen authorized by the charter may appoint the county hospital\nsuperintendent and the county hospital board of managers for terms as\nare specified in such charter. Such charter may provide that the powers\nof such board of managers may be advisory only in which event the powers\nnow granted by statute to such board shall be vested in the\nsuperintendent.\n
N.Y. PBH Law § 1407 — New York Code / Act PBH / Article 14 / Section 1407
Powers of the commissioner
Status: in_force

§ 1407. Powers of the commissioner.  In addition to the powers of the\ncommissioner or the public health council to effectuate the provisions\nof this article, the commissioner shall have the power to:\n  1. Cooperate with state and federal officials to investigate the\nstatements made in any statements or solicitation made or filed, and to\npromote camp safety standards.\n  2. Cooperate with the attorney general in the prosecution of actions\nunder this article.\n  3. Maintain a file open for public inspection and answer any inquiries\nconcerning any camp regulated by this article.\n  4. Establish forms and procedures to secure compliance with this\narticle.\n  5. Publish a list of states which have adopted camp safety standards\nand a program of compliance comparable to those of New York.\n
N.Y. PEN Law § 240.36 — New York Code / Act PEN / Part 3 / Title N / Article 240 / Section 240.36
Loitering in the first degree
Status: in_force

§ 240.36 Loitering in the first degree.\n  A person is guilty of loitering in the first degree when he loiters or\nremains in any place with one or more persons for the purpose of\nunlawfully using or possessing a controlled substance, as defined in\nsection 220.00 of this chapter.\n  Loitering in the first degree is a class B misdemeanor.\n
N.Y. TCP Law § 87 — New York Code / Act TCP / Article 7 / Section 87
Construction through villages and cities
Status: in_force

§ 87. Construction through villages and cities. No pipe line shall be\nconstructed into or through any incorporated village or city in this\nstate, unless authorized by a resolution prescribing the route, manner\nof construction and terms upon which granted, adopted at a regular\nmeeting of the board of trustees of the village or the legislative body\nof the city by a two-thirds vote thereof, but such resolution shall not\naffect any private right. No pavement shall be removed in any city under\nthe provisions of this article, except as directed by the legislative\nbody, nor until the corporation seeking to remove the same shall give a\nbond in such sum as the legislative body may require for relaying of any\npavements removed.  In case any pavement shall have been removed and not\nproperly relaid, the city may sue such corporation, for the cost of\nrelaying such pavement.\n
N.Y. GMU Law § 118-C — New York Code / Act GMU / Article 5-C / Section 118-C
Financing
Status: in_force

§ 118-c. Financing. Any municipal corporation shall have the power to\nenter into contracts with any public benefit corporation created\npursuant to article five of the public authorities law which is\nauthorized by law to furnish water to such municipal corporation,\nproviding for the financing of the acquisition and construction of\nimprovements to the water supply system or water distribution system of\nsuch municipal corporation. The terms of such contract may include,\namong other provisions, provisions requiring such municipal corporation\nto purchase water only from such public authority during the term of\nsuch contract, and which term shall be limited to the lesser of (i)\nthirty years or (ii) the probable useful life of the items for which any\nbonds are issued by such public benefit corporation to finance the\nacquisition and construction of improvements to such water supply system\nor water distribution system. The resolution of the municipal governing\nbody authorizing the municipality to enter into the contract for\nfinancing shall be subject to the same referendum requirements as if it\nwere a resolution of the municipality to authorize the sale of bonds for\nthe same purpose and amount. For purposes of this section, the term\n"municipal corporation" shall mean any city or village or any county on\nbehalf of a county water district or any town on behalf of a town water\ndistrict, water storage and distribution district or water improvement\narea.\n
N.Y. TAX Law § 1262-N — New York Code / Act TAX / Article 29 / Part 4 / Section 1262-N
Disposition of net collections from the additional one percent rate of sales and compensating use taxes in the county of Niagara
Status: in_force

§ 1262-n. Disposition of net collections from the additional one\npercent rate of sales and compensating use taxes in the county of\nNiagara.  Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, if the county\nof Niagara imposes the additional one percent rate of sales and\ncompensating use taxes authorized by section twelve hundred ten of this\narticle for all or any portion of the period beginning March first, two\nthousand three and ending November thirtieth, two thousand twenty-three,\nthe county shall use all net collections from such additional one\npercent rate to pay the county's expenses for Medicaid. The net\ncollections from the additional one percent rate imposed pursuant to\nthis section shall be deposited in a special fund to be created by such\ncounty separate and apart from any other funds and accounts of the\ncounty. Any and all remaining net collections from such additional one\npercent tax, after the Medicaid expenses are paid, shall be deposited by\nthe county of Niagara in the general fund of such county for any county\npurpose.\n
N.Y. MIL Law § 130.16 — New York Code / Act MIL / Article 7 / Part 4 / Section 130.16
Courts-martial classified
Status: in_force

§ 130.16. Courts-martial classified.  There shall be three kinds of\ncourts-martial in each of the forces of the organized militia, namely:\n  (1) General courts-martial, consisting of---\n  (A) A military judge and not less than five members; or\n  (B) Only a military judge, if before the court is assembled the\naccused, knowing the identity of the military judge and after\nconsultation with defense counsel, requests in writing a court composed\nof only a military judge and the military judge approves;\n  (2) Special courts-martial, consisting of---\n  (A) Not less than three members; or\n  (B) A military judge and not less than three members; or\n  (C) Only a military judge, if one has been detailed to the court, and\nthe accused under the same conditions as those prescribed in clause (1)\n(B) so requests; and\n  (3) Summary courts-martial, which shall consist of one commissioned\nofficer.\n
N.Y. DOM Law § 17 — New York Code / Act DOM / Article 3 / Section 17
Clergyman or officer violating article; penalty
Status: in_force

§ 17. Clergyman or officer violating article; penalty. If any\nclergyman or other person authorized by the laws of this state to\nperform marriage ceremonies shall solemnize or presume to solemnize any\nmarriage between any parties without a license being presented to him or\nthem as herein provided or with knowledge that either party is legally\nincompetent to contract matrimony as is provided for in this article he\nshall be guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction thereof shall be\npunished by a fine not less than fifty dollars nor more than five\nhundred dollars or by imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year.\n
N.Y. GBS Law § 739 — New York Code / Act GBS / Article 35-B / Section 739
Contracts void and unenforceable
Status: in_force

§ 739. Contracts void and unenforceable. 1. Any contract for services\nwhich does not comply with the applicable provisions of this article\nshall be void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy.\n  2. Any waiver by a consumer of the provisions of this article shall be\ndeemed void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy.\n
N.Y. NPC Law § 1114 — New York Code / Act NPC / Article 11 / Section 1114
Discontinuance of action or special proceeding
Status: in_force

§ 1114. Discontinuance of action or special proceeding.\n  An action or special proceeding for the dissolution of a corporation\nmay be discontinued at any stage when it is established that the cause\nfor dissolution did not exist or no longer exists.  In such event, the\ncourt shall dismiss the action or special proceeding and direct any\nreceiver to redeliver to the corporation all its remaining property.\n
N.Y. LAB Law § 656 — New York Code / Act LAB / Article 19 / Section 656
Action by commissioner upon wage board report
Status: in_force

§ 656. Action by commissioner upon wage board report.  When the wage\nboard submits its report and recommendations to the commissioner, the\ncommissioner shall forthwith file them with the secretary of the\ndepartment. Within five days of their receipt, the commissioner shall\npublish a notice of such filing in at least ten newspapers of general\ncirculation in the state. Any objections to the report and\nrecommendations shall be filed with the commissioner within fifteen days\nafter such publication. The commissioner may, if he deems it\nappropriate, order oral argument, which shall be scheduled before the\ncommissioner, or such representative as he may designate, on five days'\nnotice to the persons who have filed objections to the report and\nrecommendations. Whether or not oral argument is scheduled, the\ncommissioner shall by order accept or reject the board's report and\nrecommendations within forty-five days after filing with the secretary\nof the department. The commissioner may by such order modify the\nregulations recommended by the board. Such order of the commissioner\nshall become effective thirty days after publication, in the manner\nprescribed in this section, of a notice of such order. The commissioner\nmay, within such forty-five days, confer with the wage board, which may\nmake such changes in its report or recommendations as it may deem fit.\nThe commissioner also may, within such forty-five days, remand the\nmatter to the board for such further proceeding as he may direct.\n
N.Y. EXC Law § 300 — New York Code / Act EXC / Article 15 / Section 300
Construction
Status: in_force

§ 300. Construction. The provisions of this article shall be construed\nliberally for the accomplishment of the remedial purposes thereof,\nregardless of whether federal civil rights laws, including those laws\nwith provisions worded comparably to the provisions of this article,\nhave been so construed. Exceptions to and exemptions from the provisions\nof this article shall be construed narrowly in order to maximize\ndeterrence of discriminatory conduct. Nothing contained in this article\nshall be deemed to repeal any of the provisions of the civil rights law\nor any other law of this state relating to discrimination; but, as to\nacts declared unlawful by section two hundred ninety-six of this\narticle, the procedure herein provided shall, while pending, be\nexclusive; and the final determination therein shall exclude any other\nstate civil action based on the same grievance of the individual\nconcerned. If such individual institutes any action based on such\ngrievance without resorting to the procedure provided in this article,\nhe or she may not subsequently resort to the procedure herein.\n
N.Y. YTS Law § 15-116 — New York Code / Act YTS / Article 10 / Section 15-116
Imposition of tax; exclusion
Status: in_force

§ 15-116. Imposition of tax; exclusion.\n  A. Imposition of tax. A tax is hereby imposed at a rate of 1/4 of 1%\non the wages earned, and net earnings from self-employment, within the\nCity of Yonkers of every nonresident, individual, estate and trust.\n  B. Exclusion.\n  (1) In computing the amount of wages and net earnings from\nself-employment taxable under Subsection A of this section, there shall\nbe allowed an exclusion against the total of wages and net earnings from\nself-employment in accordance with the following table:\n     Total of\n     Wages and Net\n     Earnings from                                Exclusion\n     Self-Employment                              Allowable\n     Not over $10,000.00                          $3,000.00\n     Over $10,000.00 but not over $20,000.00      $2,000.00\n     Over $20,000.00 but not over $30,000.00      $1,000.00\n     Over $30,000.00                              None\n  (2) The exclusion allowable shall be applied pro rata against wages\nand net earnings from self-employment.\n  (3) For taxable periods of less than one year, the exclusion allowable\nshall be prorated pursuant to regulations of the State Tax Commission.\n  C. Limitation. In no event shall a taxpayer be subject to the tax\nunder this article in an amount greater than he/she would be required to\npay if he/she were a resident of the City of Yonkers and subject to the\nCity of Yonkers income tax surcharge on residents of the City of Yonkers\nadopted by the City of Yonkers pursuant to authority granted by Article\n30-A of the Tax Law.\n