FrankGoortani/open-us-law huggingface dataset:
Cal. FAC § 77027 — California Code / Code fac / Division 22 / Part 2 / Chapter 16.5 / Article 2 / Section 77027
Section 77027
Status: in_force

(a) The districts consist of the following:

(1) District 1 consists of the counties in the state that lie north of a line drawn on the south boundaries of the Counties of San Mateo, Alameda, San Joaquin, Calaveras, and Alpine.

(2) District 2 consists of all other walnut producing counties in the state south of the boundary line set forth in paragraph (1).

(b) The boundaries of any district may be changed by a two-thirds vote of the full commission, which is concurred in by the secretary, when necessary to maintain similar total production among the districts and to ensure proper representation by producers. These boundaries need not coincide with county lines.
Cal. PROB § 381 — California Code / Code prob / Division 2 / Part 11 / Chapter 3 / Article 1 / Section 381
Section 381
Status: in_force

The right of delegation does not exist to the extent the court determines that powers to be delegated are purely personal to the original fiduciary.
Cal. WIC § 1800.5 — California Code / Code wic / Division 2.5 / Chapter 1 / Article 6 / Section 1800.5
Section 1800.5
Status: in_force

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Board of Parole Hearings may request the Director of the Division of Juvenile Justice to review any case in which the Division of Juvenile Facilities has not made a request to the prosecuting attorney pursuant to Section 1800 and the board finds that the ward would be physically dangerous to the public because of the ward’s mental or physical deficiency, disorder, or abnormality that causes the person to have serious difficulty controlling his or her dangerous behavior. Upon the board’s request, a mental health professional designated by the director shall review the case and thereafter may affirm the finding or order additional assessment of the ward. If, after review, the mental health designee affirms the initial finding, concludes that a subsequent assessment does not demonstrate that a ward is subject to extended detention pursuant to Section 1800, or fails to respond to a request from the board within the timeframe mandated by this section, the board thereafter may request the prosecuting attorney to petition the committing court for an order directing that the person remain subject to the control of the division pursuant to Section 1800 if the board continues to find that the ward would be physically dangerous to the public because of the ward’s mental or physical deficiency, disorder, or abnormality that causes the person to have serious difficulty controlling his or her dangerous behavior. The board’s request to the prosecuting attorney shall be accompanied by a copy of the ward’s file and any documentation upon which the board bases its opinion, and shall include any documentation of the division’s review and recommendations made pursuant to this section. Any request for review pursuant to this section shall be submitted to the director not less than 120 days before the date of final discharge, and the review shall be completed and transmitted to the board not more than 15 days after the request has been received.
Cal. VEH § 22950 — California Code / Code veh / Division 11 / Chapter 11 / Section 22950
Section 22950
Status: in_force

Any city having a population of over 2,000,000 inhabitants shall regulate offstreet parking facilities within its jurisdiction in a manner not inconsistent with any provisions of this chapter.
Cal. FIN § 22693 — California Code / Code fin / Division 9 / Chapter 3.5 / Section 22693
Section 22693
Status: in_force

(a) The commissioner may, by rule, require a program administrator to use a real-time registry or database system for tracking PACE assessments in order to carry out his or her regulatory duties and to support enforcement. That registry or database system shall enable the program administrator to trace PACE assessments and shall include, but not be limited to, features for providing or obtaining information about a property’s status with regard to PACE assessments placed on the property, whether recorded or not. All costs associated with the real-time registry or database system shall be apportioned among licensed program administrators based on the volume and amount of PACE assessments by each program administrator, or any other method that fairly apportions the costs, as required by rule. The commissioner may contract with an independent third party for the development and ongoing maintenance and support of the real-time registry or database system, and may require the program administrators to pay for the cost of development and ongoing maintenance and support directly to the independent third party. In no event shall the costs apportioned to a program administrator exceed a reasonable regulatory cost.

(b) On or before January 1, 2020, the commissioner shall determine whether to proceed with a rulemaking action. This subdivision shall not restrict the ability of the commissioner to proceed with a rule under this section at any time.
Cal. MVC § 998.064 — California Code / Code mvc / Division 4 / Chapter 6 / Article 5r / Section 998.064
Section 998.064
Status: in_force

The State General Obligation Bond Law (Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 16720) of Part 3 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code), except as otherwise provided herein, is adopted for the purpose of the issuance, sale, and repayment of, and otherwise providing with respect to, the bonds authorized to be issued by this article, and the provisions of that law are included in this article as though set out in full in this article. All references in this article to “herein” refer both to this article and that law.
Cal. RTC § 50139.5 — California Code / Code rtc / Division 2 / Part 26 / Chapter 5 / Article 1 / Section 50139.5
Section 50139.5
Status: in_force

When an amount represented by a person who is a feepayer under this part to a customer as constituting reimbursement for fees due under this part is computed upon an amount that is not subject to that fee or is in excess of that fee amount due and is actually paid by the customer to the person, the amount so paid shall be returned by the person to the customer upon notification by the State Board of Equalization or by the customer that the excess has been ascertained. If the person fails or refuses to do so, the amount so paid, if knowingly or mistakenly computed by the person upon an amount that is not subject to the fee or is in excess of the fee due, shall be remitted by that person to this state. Those amounts remitted to the state shall be credited by the board on any amounts due and payable under this part on the same activity from the person by whom it was paid to this state and the balance, if any, shall constitute an obligation due from the person to this state.
Cal. EVID § 1283 — California Code / Code evid / Division 10 / Chapter 2 / Article 8 / Section 1283
Section 1283
Status: in_force

An official written report or record that a person is missing, missing in action, interned in a foreign country, captured by a hostile force, beleaguered by a hostile force, beseiged by a hostile force, or detained in a foreign country against his will, or is dead or is alive, made by an employee of the United States authorized by any law of the United States to make such report or record shall be received in any court, office, or other place in this state as evidence that such person is missing, missing in action, interned in a foreign country, captured by a hostile force, beleaguered by a hostile force, besieged by a hostile force, or detained in a foreign country against his will, or is dead or is alive.
Cal. PROB § 4307 — California Code / Code prob / Division 4.5 / Part 2 / Chapter 5 / Section 4307
Section 4307
Status: in_force

(a) A copy of a power of attorney certified under this section has the same force and effect as the original power of attorney.

(b) A copy of a power of attorney may be certified by any of the following:

(1) An attorney authorized to practice law in this state.

(2) A notary public in this state.

(3) An official of a state or of a political subdivision who is authorized to make certifications.

(c) The certification shall state that the certifying person has examined the original power of attorney and the copy and that the copy is a true and correct copy of the original power of attorney.

(d) Nothing in this section is intended to create an implication that a third person may be liable for acting in good faith reliance on a copy of a power of attorney that has not been certified under this section.
Cal. FAM § 500 — California Code / Code fam / Division 3 / Part 4 / Chapter 1 / Section 500
Section 500
Status: in_force

When two unmarried people, not minors, have been living together as spouses, they may be married pursuant to this chapter by a person authorized to solemnize a marriage under Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 400) of Part 3.
Cal. RTC § 18542 — California Code / Code rtc / Division 2 / Part 10.2 / Chapter 2 / Article 1 / Section 18542
Section 18542
Status: in_force

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Franchise Tax Board may design tax returns to provide for the designation of contributions to specified funds, as otherwise provided by law, on a separate schedule which shall be attached to the primary return form.
Cal. WIC § 827.11 — California Code / Code wic / Division 2 / Part 1 / Chapter 2 / Article 22 / Section 827.11
Section 827.11
Status: in_force

(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(1) It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure quality care for children and youth who are placed in the continuum of foster care settings.

(2) Attracting and retaining quality caregivers is critical to achieving positive outcomes for children, youth, and families, and to ensuring the success of child welfare improvement efforts.

(3) Quality caregivers strengthen foster care by ensuring that a foster or relative family caring for a child provides the loving, committed, and skilled care that the child needs, while working effectively with the child welfare system to reach the child’s goals.

(4) Caregivers who are informed of the child’s educational, medical, dental, and mental health history and current needs are better able to meet those needs and address the effects of trauma, increasing placement stability and improving permanency outcomes.

(5) Sharing necessary information with the caregiver is a critical component of effective service delivery for children and youth in foster care.

(b) Therefore, consistent with state and federal law, information shall be provided to a caregiver regarding the child’s or youth’s educational, medical, dental, and mental health history and current needs.

(c) This section is declaratory of existing law and is not intended to impose a new program or higher level of service upon any local agency. It is intended, however, that this restatement of existing law should engender a renewed sense of commitment to engaging foster parents in order to provide quality care to children and youth in foster care.

(d) No later than January 1, 2017, the department shall consult with representatives of the County Counsels’ Association of California, County Welfare Directors Association of California, and stakeholders to develop regulations or identify policy changes necessary to allow for the sharing of information as described in this section.
Cal. HSC § 111575 — California Code / Code hsc / Division 104 / Part 5 / Chapter 6 / Article 5 / Section 111575
Section 111575
Status: in_force

The department shall issue an order withdrawing approval of an application concerning any new drug or device if, after giving written notice to the applicant and an opportunity for a hearing, the department makes any of the following findings:

(a)  That clinical or other experience, tests, or other scientific data show that the new drug or device is unsafe for use under the conditions of use upon the basis of which the application was approved.

(b)  That new evidence of clinical experience, not contained in the application or not available to the department until after the application was approved, or tests by new methods, or tests by methods not deemed reasonably applicable when the application was approved, evaluated together with the evidence available to the department when the application was approved, shows that the new drug or device is not shown to be safe for use under the conditions of use upon the basis of which the application was approved.

(c)  On the basis of new information with respect to the new drug or device, evaluated together with the evidence available to the department when the application was approved, that there is a lack of substantial evidence that the new drug or device will have the effect it purports or is represented to have, under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling or advertising of the new drug or device.

(d)  That the application contains any untrue statement of a material fact.

(e)  That the applicant has failed to establish a system for maintaining required records, or has repeatedly or deliberately failed to maintain the records or to make required reports, or the applicant has refused to permit access to, or copying or verification of, the records.

(f)  That on the basis of new information before the department, evaluated together with the evidence before it when the application was approved, the methods used in, or the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, and packing of the new drug or device are inadequate to assure and preserve its identity, strength, quality, purity, composition, and characteristics as determined by qualified experts selected by the department, and were not made adequate within a reasonable time after receipt of written notice from the department specifying the matter complained of.

(g)  That on the basis of new information before it, evaluated together with the evidence before it when the application was approved, the labeling or advertisement of the new drug or device, based on an evaluation of all material facts, is false or misleading in any particular and is not corrected within a reasonable time after receipt of written notice from the department specifying the matter complained of.
Cal. ELEC § 1302.2 — California Code / Code elec / Division 1 / Chapter 4 / Section 1302.2
Section 1302.2
Status: in_force

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when an elementary, unified, high school, or community college district includes within its boundaries the same territory, or territory that is in part the same, as a chartered city, the governing board member elections of the elementary, unified, high school, or community college district may be consolidated with the city election pursuant to Part 3 (commencing with Section 10400) of Division 10. The consolidation shall be effected by the officer conducting the election having jurisdiction of the elementary, unified, high school, or community college district, upon the written request of the governing board of the elementary, unified, high school, or community college district and with the written consent of the legislative body of the city. This section shall control in the event of any conflict with a prior order of the county superintendent of schools made pursuant to Section 5340 of the Education Code.

(b) When a high school district or community college district election is consolidated with that of a city pursuant to this section, and the high school district or community college district has within its boundaries component districts whose elections would otherwise be held on a date specified in this code, the elections in the component districts may be consolidated with the election in the high school district or community college district. The consolidation shall be effected by the officer conducting the election having jurisdiction of the component districts upon the written request of the governing boards thereof and with the written consent of the governing boards of the districts whose governing board member elections are to be consolidated with those of the component districts.

(c) Successors to incumbents holding office upon the effective date of this section, who in the absence of this section would have been elected at a different time, shall be chosen for office at the election nearest the time the terms of office of the incumbents would have otherwise expired. If an incumbent’s term of office is extended because of this section, he or she shall hold office until a successor qualifies for the office, but in no event shall the term of an incumbent be extended to more than four years.
Cal. PROB § 3057 — California Code / Code prob / Division 4 / Part 6 / Chapter 2 / Article 1 / Section 3057
Section 3057
Status: in_force

(a) Where a spouse lacks legal capacity and does not have a conservator, any interested person who has knowledge or reason to believe that the rights of such spouse in the community property are being prejudiced may bring an action on behalf of such spouse to enforce the duty imposed by Sections 721 and 1100 of the Family Code with respect to the management and control of the community property and to obtain such relief as may be appropriate.

(b) If one spouse has a conservator and the other spouse is managing or controlling community property, the conservator has the duty to keep reasonably informed concerning the management and control, including the disposition, of the community property. If the conservator has knowledge or reason to believe that the rights of the conservatee in the community property are being prejudiced, the conservator may bring an action on behalf of the conservatee to enforce the duty imposed by Sections 721 and 1100 of the Family Code with respect to the management and control of the community property and to obtain such relief as may be appropriate.
Cal. WIC § 12300.5 — California Code / Code wic / Division 9 / Part 3 / Chapter 3 / Article 7 / Section 12300.5
Section 12300.5
Status: in_force

The department, in consultation with stakeholders, shall create, and provide to the Legislature, the framework for a permanent provider backup system. The permanent backup provider system shall not be implemented, and state or federal funds appropriated in the 2021–22 fiscal year or any other fiscal year shall not be used, until statutes are enacted to define the parameters of this service, including, but not limited to, the criteria and circumstances when those services may be approved for a recipient who is authorized to receive in-home supportive services pursuant to this article or Sections 14132.95, 14132.952, or 14132.956, as administered by the department, or waiver personal care services pursuant to Section 14132.97, as administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, or any combination of these services.
Cal. FAM § 8601.5 — California Code / Code fam / Division 13 / Part 2 / Chapter 1 / Section 8601.5
Section 8601.5
Status: in_force

(a) A court may issue an order of adoption and declare that it shall be entered nunc pro tunc when it will serve public policy and the best interests of the child, such as cases where adoption finalization has been delayed beyond the child’s 18th birthday due to factors beyond the control of the prospective adoptive family and the proposed adoptee.

(b) The request for nunc pro tunc entry of the order shall be stated in the adoption request or an amendment thereto, and shall set forth specific facts in support thereof.

(c) To the extent that a child’s eligibility for any publicly funded benefit program is or could be altered by the entry of an order of adoption, the change in eligibility shall not be determined as of the nunc pro tunc date, but shall be determined as of the date of the adoption finalization hearing.

(d) The nunc pro tunc date shall not precede the date upon which the parental rights of the birth parent or parents were initially terminated, whether voluntarily or involuntarily.
Cal. PRC § 42921.5 — California Code / Code prc / Division 30 / Part 3 / Chapter 18.5 / Section 42921.5
Section 42921.5
Status: in_force

(a) After January 1, 2009, the board shall determine each state agency’s or a large state facility’s compliance with Section 42921, for each year, commencing with January 1, 2007, by comparing the per capita disposal rate in subsequent years with the equivalent per capita disposal rate that would have been necessary for the state agency or large state facility to comply with Section 42921 on January 1, 2007, as calculated pursuant to subdivision (d).

(b) In making a determination whether a state agency or large state facility is in compliance with the requirements of Section 42921, the board may consider an agency’s or facility’s per capita disposal rate as a factor in determining whether the state agency or large state facility is adequately implementing its integrated waste management plan. The board shall not consider a state, agency, or large state facility’s per capita disposal rate to be determinative when considering whether the agency or facility is implementing its integrated waste management plan.

(c) When determining whether an agency or facility is in compliance with Section 42921, the board shall consider that an increase in the per capita disposal rate is a result of disposal amounts increasing faster than the growth of the state agency or large state facility. The board shall use an increase in the per capita disposal rate that is in excess of the equivalent per capita disposal rate as a factor in determining whether the board is required to more closely examine the agency’s or facility’s plan implementation efforts. If indicated by this examination, the board may require a state agency or large state facility to expand existing programs or implement new programs.

(d) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), “per capita disposal” or “per capita disposal rate” means the total annual disposal by a state agency or large state facility, in pounds, divided by total number of employees in that state agency or large state facility, and divided by 365 days.

(2) The board may alternatively define per capita disposal or per capita disposal rate for a state agency or large state facility that has a significant amount of disposal from nonemployees or for other reasons that would make calculation of per capita disposal by the number of employees inaccurate.
Cal. BPC § 3099 — California Code / Code bpc / Division 2 / Chapter 7 / Article 5 / Section 3099
Section 3099
Status: in_force

No optometrist shall advertise or otherwise hold himself or herself out to be a specialist in eye disease and the treatment thereof.
Cal. HNC § 1170 — California Code / Code hnc / Division 5 / Chapter 4 / Article 1 / Section 1170
Section 1170
Status: in_force

The board shall appoint and license the number of pilots which is sufficient to carry out the purposes of this division.
Cal. HSC § 44299.54 — California Code / Code hsc / Division 26 / Part 5 / Chapter 9.5 / Section 44299.54
Section 44299.54
Status: in_force

On or before January 10, 2001, the executive officer of the state board shall make a determination as to the eligibility of NO x retrofit technologies for use in the program, and may make additional determinations of eligibility of NO x technologies after January 10, 2001. In order to be determined eligible by the executive officer of the state board, each NO x retrofit technology shall have, at a minimum, the ability to reduce onroad heavy-duty diesel emissions of NO x by 10 percent or more and shall be durable and effective in reducing emissions, as determined by the executive officer of the state board.
Cal. LAB § 3083 — California Code / Code lab / Division 3 / Chapter 4 / Article 2 / Section 3083
Section 3083
Status: in_force

All findings of fact in a final determination or decision issued pursuant to Section 3082 shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence, and all orders and decisions shall be prima facie lawful and reasonable.