FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: The importance of public service broadcasting for social, democratic and cultural life was reaffirmed in the Act referred to at point 33 of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement (Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 25 January 1999 concerning public service broadcasting) [13], as adapted by Protocol 1 thereto (hereinafter referred to as the Resolution concerning public service broadcasting) [14]. As underlined by the Resolution concerning public service broadcasting ‘broad public access, without discrimination and on the basis of equal opportunities, to various channels and services is a necessary precondition for fulfilling the special obligation of public service broadcasting’. Moreover, public service broadcasting needs to ‘benefit from technological progress’, bring ‘the public the benefits of the new audiovisual and information services and the new technologies’ and to undertake ‘the development and diversification of activities in the digital age’. Finally, ‘public service broadcasting must be able to continue to provide a wide range of programming in accordance with its remit as defined by the Member States in order to address society as a whole; in this context it is legitimate for public service broadcasting to seek to reach wide audiences’.
Danish: Betydningen af public service radio og tv for samfundslivet, demokratiet og kulturlivet blev også fastslået i den akt, hvortil der henvises i punkt 33 i bilag XI til EØS-aftalen (Resolution vedtaget af Rådet og repræsentanterne for medlemsstaternes regeringer, forsamlet i Rådet den 25. januar 1999 om public service-radio- og tv-virksomhed) [13], som tilpasset aftalen ved protokol 1 (herefter benævnt »resolutionen om public service radio- og tv-virksomhed«) [14]. I resolutionen om public service radio- og tv-virksomhed understreges følgende: »Det er en nødvendig forudsætning for opfyldelsen af de særlige pligter i forbindelse med public service-radio- og tv-virksomhed, at offentligheden har bred adgang til de forskellige kanaler og tjenester uden forskelsbehandling og på lige vilkår«. Endvidere skal public service radio- og tv-selskaber ved varetagelsen af deres opgaver »fortsat udnytte de teknologiske fremskridt« og »give offentligheden udbytte af de nye audiovisuelle tjenester og informationstjenester samt den nye teknologi« og »udvikle og diversificere deres aktiviteter i den digitale tidsalder«. Endelig skal »public service-radio- og -tv-foretagender […] fortsat, i overensstemmelse med de opgaver, som medlemsstaterne har pålagt dem, kunne tilbyde et stort udvalg af programmer, som henvender sig til hele samfundet; set i dette perspektiv er det legitimt, at public service-radio- og -tv-foretagender forsøger at nå ud til et bredt publikum«.
English: The regulatory framework concerning ‘audiovisual media services’ is coordinated at European level by the Directive 2007/65/EC (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). The financial transparency requirements concerning public undertakings are regulated by the Act referred to at point 1a of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement (Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings) [20], as adapted by Protocol 1 thereto (hereinafter referred to as Directive 2006/111/EC (Transparency Directive)) [21].
Danish: Reglerne om »audiovisuelle medietjenester« samordnes på europæisk plan i direktiv 2007/65/EF (direktivet om audiovisuelle medietjenester). Kravene om økonomisk gennemsigtighed i forbindelse med offentlige virksomheder er fastsat i den akt, hvortil der henvises i punkt 1a i bilag XV til EØS-aftalen (Kommissionens direktiv 2006/111/EF af 16. november 2006 om gennemskueligheden af de økonomiske forbindelser mellem medlemsstaterne og de offentlige virksomheder og om den finansielle gennemskuelighed i bestemte virksomheder) [20], som tilpasset aftalen ved protokol 1 (herefter benævnt »direktiv 2006/111/EF« (gennemsigtighedsdirektivet)) [21].
Maltese: Il-qafas regolatorju dwar "servizzi tal-midja awdjoviżivi" fil-livell Ewropew huwa kkoordinat mid-Direttiva 2007/65/KE (id-Direttiva dwar is-Servizzi tal-Midja Awdjoviżiva. Il-ħtiġijiet għal trasparenza finanzjarja rigward impriżi pubbliċi huma regolati bl-Att msemmi fil-punt 1a tal-Anness XV tal-Ftehim taż-ŻEE (id-Direttiva tal-Kummissjoni 2006/111/KE tas-16 ta' Novembru 2006 dwar it-trasparenza tar-relazzjonijiet finanzjarji bejn l-Istati Membri u l-impriżi pubbliċi kif ukoll dwar it-trasparenza finanzjarja fi ħdan ċerti impriżi Test b'rilevanza għaż-ŻEE) [20], kif adottat bil-Protokoll 1 tiegħu (minn hawn ’il quddiem msejħa d-Direttiva 2006/111/KE (id-Direttiva dwar it-Trasparenza)) [21].
English: Funding schemes can be divided into two broad categories: ‘single-funding’ and ‘dual-funding’. The ‘single-funding’ category comprises those systems in which public service broadcasting is financed only through public funds, in whatever form. ‘Dual-funding’ systems comprise a wide range of schemes, where public service broadcasting is financed by different combinations of State funds and revenues from commercial or public service activities, such as the sale of advertising space or programmes and the offering of services against payment.
Danish: Finansieringsordninger kan inddeles i to hovedkategorier, nemlig »énkildefinansiering« og »todelt finansiering«. »Enkildefinansiering« betyder, at public service-selskaberne udelukkende finansieres med offentlige midler, uanset disse midlers form. Systemet med »todelt finansiering« omfatter en række forskellige finansieringsordninger, hvor public service-selskaber finansieres med forskellige kombinationer af statsmidler og indtægter af kommercielle eller public service-aktiviteter, som f.eks. salg af reklameplads eller programmer eller salg af betalingstjenester.
English: The financial situation of the public service broadcasters should be subject to an in-depth review at the end of each financing period as provided for in the national broadcasting systems of the EFTA States, or in the absence thereof, a time period which normally should not exceed four years. Any ‘public service reserves’ existing at the end of the financing period, or of an equivalent period as provided above, shall be taken into account for the calculation of the financial needs of the public service broadcaster for the next period.
Danish: Public service radio- og tv-selskabers finansielle situation bør granskes indgående ved udløbet af hver finansieringsperiode, som fastsat i EFTA-staternes nationale regler for radio- og tv-virksomhed, eller, hvis der ikke findes en sådan finansieringsperiode, en periode, som normalt ikke må overstige fire år.
English: It is up to the EFTA States to determine, taking into account the characteristics and the evolution of the broadcasting market, as well as the range of services already offered by the public service broadcaster, what shall qualify as ‘significant new service’. The ‘new’ nature of an activity may depend among others on its content as well as on the modalities of consumption [50].
Danish: Det er op til EFTA-staten at afgøre, hvad der under hensyntagen til de forhold, der præger radio- og tv-markedet, og udviklingen på dette marked samt de tjenester, public service-selskabet i forvejen udbyder, skal betragtes som en »væsentlig ny tjeneste«. En aktivitets »nye« karakter kan bl.a. bero på dens indhold og på forbrugsmåden [50]. Ved vurdering af, om der er tale om en »væsentlig« tjeneste, kan der f.eks. tages hensyn til, hvilke finansielle ressourcer det har krævet at udvikle den, og hvilke virkninger den ventes at få for efterspørgslen.
English: The ‘significance’ of the service may take into account for instance the financial resources required for its development and the expected impact on demand. Significant modifications to existing services shall be subject to the same assessment as significant new services.
Danish: Væsentlige ændringer i eksisterende tjenester skal vurderes på samme måde som væsentlige nye tjenester.
English: For the purpose of the present Chapter, the notion ‘audiovisual service(s)’ refers to the linear and/or non-linear distribution of audio and/or audiovisual content and of other neighbouring services such as online text-based information services. This notion of ‘audiovisual service(s)’ must be distinguished from the narrower concept of ‘audiovisual media service(s)’, as defined in Article 1(a) of Directive 2007/65/EC (Audiovisual Media Services Directive).
Danish: I dette kapitel omfatter begrebet »audiovisuelle tjenester« lineær og/eller ikke-lineær distribution af audioindhold og/eller audiovisuelt indhold og andre beslægtede tjenester, såsom tekstbaserede onlineinformationstjenester. Der skal skelnes mellem begrebet »audiovisuelle tjenester« og det snævrere begreb »audiovisuelle medietjenester«, som er defineret i artikel 1, litra a), i direktiv 2007/65/EF (direktivet om audiovisuelle medietjenester).
English: These qualitative criteria are according to the General Court ‘the justification for the existence of broadcasting SGEIs in the national audiovisual sector’. There is ‘no reason for a widely defined broadcasting SGEI which sacrifices compliance with those qualitative requirements in order to adopt the conduct of a commercial operator’, see SIC v Commission, cited above, paragraph 211.
Italian: A giudizio del Tribunale, tali criteri qualitativi sono la ragion d'essere di servizi d'interesse economico generale di emittenza radiotelevisiva nel settore audiovisivo nazionale e non vi è dunque motivo che continui ad essere finanziato dallo Stato un servizio di emittenza radiotelevisiva d'interesse economico generale che sacrifichi la rispondenza ai suddetti criteri qualitativi per adottare il comportamento di un operatore commerciale, cfr.. SIC/Commissione, punto 211.
Danish: Disse kvalitative krav er ifølge Retten »begrundelsen for SIEG med hensyn til radio- og tv-virksomhed i det nationale audiovisuelle landskab«. Der er »ingen grund til, at en SIEG med hensyn til radio- og tv-virksomhed defineret bredt, men som ser bort fra de kvalitative krav til fordel for en kommerciel operatør […] fortsat finansieres af staten under samme betingelser, som hvis de kvalitative krav blev overholdt«, se dommen i sagen SIC mod Kommissionen, op.cit., præmis 211.
Hungarian: A Törvényszék szerint „a minőségi követelmények képezik ugyanis a műsorszórásra irányuló általános gazdasági érdekű szolgáltatás létjogosultságának alapját a nemzeti audiovizuális választékban, következésképpen nem indokolható, hogy valamely műsorszórásra irányuló általános gazdasági érdekű szolgáltatást – amelyet tágan határoztak meg, viszont amely feláldozza e minőségi követelmények tiszteletben tartását valamely kereskedelmi műsorszolgáltató […] magatartásának javára – az állam […] továbbra is finanszírozzon”, lásd a fent hivatkozott SIC kontra Bizottság ügyben hozott ítélet 211. pontját.
English: Member States are required by Directive 2006/111/EC (Transparency Directive) to take transparency measures in the case of any undertaking granted special or exclusive rights or entrusted with the operation of a service of general economic interest and receiving public service compensation in any form whatsoever in relation to such service and which carries out other activities, that is to say, non-public service activities. These transparency requirements are: (a) the internal accounts corresponding to different activities, i.e. public service and non-public service activities must be separate; (b) all costs and revenues must be correctly assigned or allocated on the basis of consistently applied and objectively justifiable cost accounting principles; and (c) the cost-accounting principles according to which separate accounts are maintained must be clearly established [44].
German: Nach der Richtlinie 2006/111/EG (Transparenzrichtlinie) müssen die EFTA-Staaten bei allen Unternehmen, denen besondere oder ausschließliche Rechte gewährt wurden oder die mit der Erbringung einer Dienstleistung von allgemeinem wirtschaftlichem Interesse betraut sind und in diesem Zusammenhang einen irgendwie gearteten Ausgleich für die Erfüllung gemeinwirtschaftlicher Verpflichtungen erhalten und gleichzeitig auch Tätigkeiten außerhalb des öffentlich-rechtlichen Auftrags ausüben, Transparenzmaßnahmen treffen, durch die gewährleistet wird, dass a) die internen Konten, die den verschiedenen Geschäftsbereichen (d. h. öffentlich-rechtlichen Tätigkeiten und sonstigen Tätigkeiten) entsprechen, getrennt geführt werden, b) alle Kosten und Erlöse auf der Grundlage einheitlich angewandter und objektiv gerechtfertigter Kostenrechnungsgrundsätze korrekt zugeordnet und zugewiesen werden, c) die Kostenrechnungsgrundsätze, die der getrennten Buchführung zugrunde liegen, eindeutig bestimmt sind [44].
English: Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the Authority on 19 January 1994, published in the Official Journal of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as OJ) L 231, 3.9.1994, p. 1 and EEA Supplement No 32, 3.9.1994, p. 1, as amended. Hereinafter referred to as the State Aid Guidelines.
Dutch: Richtsnoeren voor de toepassing en uitlegging van de artikelen 61 en 62 van de EER-overeenkomst en artikel 1 van Protocol nr. 3 bij de toezichtovereenkomst, op 19 januari 1994 vastgesteld en uitgevaardigd door de Toezichthoudende Autoriteit van de EVA, bekendgemaakt in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie (hierna „PB” genoemd) L 231 van 3.9.1994, blz. 1 en EER-supplement nr. 32 van 3.9.1994, blz. 1, hierna „de richtsnoeren staatssteun” genoemd.
Greek: Κατευθυντήριες γραμμές σχετικά με την εφαρμογή και ερμηνεία των άρθρων 61 και 62 της συμφωνίας για τον ΕΟΧ και του άρθρου 1 του Πρωτοκόλλου 3 της Συμφωνίας περί εποπτείας και Δικαστηρίου, οι οποίες εγκρίθηκαν και εκδόθηκαν από την Αρχή στις 19 Ιανουαρίου 1994, δημοσιεύθηκαν στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (εφεξής «ΕΕ») L 231 της 3.9.1994, σ. 1 και στο συμπλήρωμα ΕΟΧ αριθ. 32 της 3.9.1994, σ. 1 (εφεξής «κατευθυντήριες γραμμές για τις κρατικές ενισχύσεις»).
Estonian: Suunised EMP lepingu artiklite 61 ja 62 ning järelevalve- ja kohtulepingu protokolli nr 3 artikli 1 kohaldamiseks ja tõlgendamiseks, mille järelevalveamet võttis vastu ja avaldas 19. jaanuaril 1994 ning mis on muudetud kujul avaldatud Euroopa Liidu Teatajas (edaspidi „ELT”) L 231, 3.9.1994, lk 1, ja sama päeva EMP kaasandes nr 32, lk 1 (edaspidi „riigiabi suunised”).
Latvian: EEZ līguma 61. un 62. panta un Uzraudzības iestādes un Tiesas nolīguma 3. protokola 1. panta piemērošanas un interpretācijas pamatnostādnes, ko Iestāde pieņēma un izdeva 1994. gada 19. janvārī un kas to grozītajā redakcijā publicētas Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī (turpmāk tekstā – “OV”) L 231, 3.9.1994., 1. lpp., un EEZ papildinājumā Nr. 32, 3.9.1994., 1. lpp. Turpmāk “Valsts atbalsta pamatnostādnes”.
English: For example, Commission Decision N 458/2004, State aid to Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl. (OJ C 131, 28.5.2005, p. 12).
French: Voir, par exemple, la décision de la Commission concernant l'aide N 458/04, Aide en faveur de Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding, SL (JO C 131 du 28.5.2005, p. 12).
Spanish: Por ejemplo, la Decisión de la Comisión en el asunto N 458/2004, Ayuda estatal a Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding SL (DO C 131 de 28.5.2005, p. 12).
Dutch: Zie bv. het besluit van de Commissie betreffende steunmaatregel N 458/2004 — Overheidssteun voor Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl (PB C 131 van 28.5.2005, blz. 12).
Swedish: Se t.ex. kommissionens beslut N 458/2004, Statligt stöd till Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl (EUT C 131, 28.5.2005, s. 12).
Finnish: Esimerkiksi komission päätös asiassa N 458/04, valtiontuki Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl:lle (EUVL C 131, 28.5.2005, s. 12).
Greek: Παραδείγματος χάρη, απόφαση της Επιτροπής N 458/2004, Κρατική ενίσχυση προς την Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl., βλ. ΕΕ C 131 της 29ης Μαΐου 2005, σ. 12.
Hungarian: Például az N 458/2004. sz., az Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding S.L.-nak nyújtott állami támogatás ügyben hozott bizottsági határozat (HL C 131., 2005.5.28., 12. o.).
Slovenian: Na primer Odločba Komisije N 458/2004, Državna pomoč za Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl. (UL C 131, 28.5.2005, str.12).
Estonian: Näiteks komisjoni otsus NN 458/2004 riigiabi kohta Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl.-ile (ELT C 131, 28.5.2005, lk 12).
Lithuanian: Pvz., Komisijos sprendimas Nr. 458/2004 dėl valstybės pagalbos Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl. (OL C 131, 2005 5 28, p. 12).
Maltese: Eżempju, id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni N 458/2004 Għajnuna mill-Istat lil Espacio Editorial Andaluza Holding sl., (ĠU C 131, 28.5.2005, p. 12).
English: Hereinafter referred to as the State Aid Guidelines. The updated version of the State Aid Guidelines is published on the Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/legal-framework/state-aid-guidelines
Spanish: En lo sucesivo denominadas «Directrices sobre ayudas estatales» y cuya versión actualizada se publica en la página web del Órgano de Vigilancia: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/legal-framework/state-aid-guidelines/
English: The previous Chapter on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting of the State Aid Guidelines [2] has first set out the framework governing State funding of public service broadcasting. It has served as a good basis for the Authority to handle cases in the field of financing of public service broadcasters.
Spanish: El anterior capítulo sobre la aplicación de las normas en materia de ayudas estatales a los servicios públicos de radiodifusión de las Directrices sobre ayudas estatales [2] estableció por primera vez el marco regulador de la financiación por el Estado de los servicios públicos de radiodifusión y ha constituido una buena base a partir de la cual el Órgano ha desarrollado una importante práctica decisoria en este sector.
English: Nor does it contain a cultural exemption similar to Article 107(3)(d) TFEU, which allows the Commission to regard aid to promote culture as compatible with the common market where such aid does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Community to an extent that is contrary to the common interest. This does not, however, mean that the application of the State aid rules does not leave any room for the consideration of cultural aspects.
Estonian: Samuti ei sisalda see kultuurialase erandi sätet, mis oleks sarnane Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artikli 107 lõike 3 punktiga d. Siiski ei tähenda see, et riigiabi eeskirjade rakendamine välistaks kultuuriaspektid täielikult.
English: Guidelines on the application and interpretation of Articles 61 and 62 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1 of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, adopted and issued by the Authority on 19 January 1994, published in the Official Journal of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as OJ) L 231, 3.9.1994, p. 1 and EEA Supplement No 32, 3.9.1994, p. 1, as amended. Hereinafter referred to as the State Aid Guidelines. The updated version of the State Aid Guidelines is published on the Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/legal-framework/state-aid-guidelines
Finnish: Suuntaviivat ETA-sopimuksen 61 ja 62 artiklan sekä valvonta- ja tuomioistuinsopimuksen pöytäkirjassa 3 olevan 1 artiklan soveltamista ja tulkitsemista varten, valvontaviranomainen hyväksynyt ja antanut 19 päivänä tammikuuta 1994 (julkaistu Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisessa lehdessä, jäljempänä ’EYVL’, EYVL L 231, 3.9.1994, s. 1, ja ETA-täydennysosassa N:o 32, 3.9.1994, s. 1), sellaisina kuin ne ovat muutettuina. Jäljempänä ’valtiontuen suuntaviivat’. Valtiontuen suuntaviivojen päivitetty versio on saatavilla valvontaviranomaisen internetsivuilla: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/legal-framework/state-aid-guidelines/
English: EFTA States have therefore decided to introduce competition in the market. This has led to a wider choice for consumers, as many additional channels and new services became available; it has also favoured the emergence and growth of strong European operators, the development of new technologies, and a larger degree of pluralism in the sector, which means more than a simple availability of additional channels and services.
French: Les États de l’AELE ont alors décidé d'ouvrir le marché à la concurrence, ce qui a permis aux consommateurs de bénéficier d'un choix plus vaste, et notamment d'un plus grand nombre de chaînes et de nouveaux services; cela a aussi favorisé l'apparition et la croissance d'opérateurs européens importants, ainsi que la mise au point de techniques nouvelles, et instauré davantage de pluralisme dans le secteur, ce qui va au-delà de la simple existence de chaînes et de services supplémentaires.
Italian: Gli Stati EFTA hanno quindi deciso d'introdurre la concorrenza nel mercato, il che ha comportato più ampia scelta per i consumatori, via via che diventavano disponibili molti altri canali e nuovi servizi, ed ha anche favorito l'emergere e la crescita di forti operatori europei, lo sviluppo di nuove tecnologie e un maggior grado di pluralismo nel settore, ossia più che la semplice disponibilità di altri canali e servizi.
Portuguese: Os Estados da EFTA decidiram então abrir o mercado à concorrência, o que proporcionou uma escolha mais vasta para os consumidores, uma vez que passaram a dispor de um elevado número de canais suplementares e de novos serviços; favoreceu também o aparecimento e o crescimento de fortes operadores europeus e o desenvolvimento de novas tecnologias e reforçou o pluralismo no setor, o que implica mais do que a mera disponibilidade de canais e serviços adicionais.
English: There has been a multiplication of distribution platforms and technologies, such as digital television, IPTV, mobile TV and video on demand. This has led to an increase in competition with new players, such as network operators and internet companies, entering the market.
French: Une multitude de plates-formes et de technologies de distribution sont apparues, notamment la télévision numérique, la télédiffusion par internet, la télévision mobile et la vidéo à la demande, ce qui a entraîné une concurrence accrue et l'apparition de nouveaux acteurs sur le marché, tels que les exploitants de réseau et les entreprises internet.
Portuguese: Assistiu-se a uma multiplicação de plataformas e tecnologias de distribuição, como a televisão digital, a IPTV (televisão pela Internet), a televisão móvel e o vídeo a pedido, o que provocou um aumento da concorrência e a entrada no mercado de novos intervenientes, como operadores de rede e empresas de Internet.
English: The EEA Agreement does not contain a provision similar to Article 167 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as TFEU) (ex Article 151 of the EC Treaty) concerning culture or a ‘cultural exemption’ for aid to promote culture similar to that contained in Article 107(3)(d) TFEU (ex Article 87(3)(d) of the EC Treaty). However, this does not mean that an exemption for such measures is excluded.
French: L'accord EEE ne contient pas de disposition similaire à celle de l’article 167 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne (ci-après dénommé le «TFUE») (ex-article 151 du traité CE) concernant la culture ni d'«exemption culturelle» pour les aides visant à promouvoir la culture similaire à celle introduite par l'article 107, paragraphe 3, point d), du TFUE [ex-article 87, paragraphe 3, point d), du traité CE], ce qui ne signifie cependant pas que toute exemption soit exclue pour ces mesures.