FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: The scope of the obligation to enter guarantees in the Finance Act does not extend to guarantees that arise out of the legal form of an organisation, or out of an obligation established in case-law, which are guarantees of an implied and automatic character.
Swedish: Tillämpningsområdet för skyldigheten att föra in garantier i en finansiell lag omfattar alltså inte garantier som uppstår till följd av en juridisk ställning eller av en skyldighet som fastställs i rättspraxis och som utmärks av att de är underförstådda och automatiska. Denna andra kategori omfattas inte av något statligt beslut utan handlar om att staten placerar sig i en redan befintlig rättslig situation som garantin bara är en följd av.
Finnish: Sen vuoksi velvollisuus merkitä takaukset finanssilakiin ei kata tietystä asemasta tai oikeuskäytännöstä johtuvasta velvoitteesta aiheutuvia takauksia, joille on ominaista se, että ne ovat luonteeltaan implisiittisiä ja automaattisia.
English: This category is not the result of a decision of the State, but of the fact that the State places itself in an existing legal framework, the guarantee being only one effect of that framework [77].
Finnish: Tämä toinen takausten luokka ei siis perustu valtion päätökseen vaan siihen, että valtio toimii olemassa olevassa sääntelykehyksessä, ja takaus on vain yksi sääntelykehyksen vaikutuksista [77].
English: The Commission concludes, as it did in recital 131 of decision C 56/2007, to which it refers mutatis mutandis, that the argument put forward by the French authorities on the basis of the Organic Law governing the Finance Act is not convincing, because the fact that it is not stated in any Finance Act that the State extends a guarantee to IFP by virtue of its legal form does not mean that there is no implied guarantee.
Swedish: Kommissionens slutsats är därför densamma som i skäl 131 i beslut C 56/2007, till vilket den i tillämpliga delar hänvisar till, det vill säga att de franska myndigheternas argument med hänvisning till grundlagen om finanslagstiftning inte är övertygande och att det faktum att det inte anges i någon finansiell lag att staten erbjuder den offentliga institutionen IFP garantier till följd av dess juridiska ställning inte utesluter att det ändå förekommer en sådan garanti.
Finnish: Komissio päättelee edellä esitetystä, kuten se on jo todennut päätöksen C 56/2007 johdanto-osan 131 kappaleessa, johon se viittaa soveltuvin osin, ettei Ranskan viranomaisten LOLF-lakiin perustuva väite ole vakuuttava ja ettei se, ettei missään finanssilaissa ilmoiteta valtion myöntävän takausta IFP:lle tämän aseman perusteella, estä implisiittisen takauksen olemassaoloa.
English: The Commission is not in any event bound by the description of the measure as a ‘guarantee’ for purposes of French law, or by the fact that a guarantee is or is not caught by the Organic Law governing the Finance Act. The only relevant consideration is how the measure is to be described for purposes of Union law.
Finnish: Komissio päättelee edelleen, ettei se ole sidottu Ranskan lainsäädännön määritelmään toimenpiteestä takauksena eikä siihenkään, että kyseessä olisi LOLF:n soveltamisalaan kuuluva takaus.
English: Union law recognises the existence of an implied guarantee once a Member State legally has to repay a claim on another person in the event of that person’s defaulting [78].
Finnish: Komissio katsoo, että merkittävä tekijä on ainoastaan toimenpiteen luokittelu unionin lainsäädännön perusteella, jossa tunnustetaan implisiittisen takauksen olemassaolo silloin, kun jäsenvaltio on juridisesti velvollinen korvaamaan toisen henkilön saatavan tämän lyötyä laimin maksusitoumuksensa [78].
English: ‘Article 1355 A person shall be liable automatically for the damage caused by those whose way of life he regulates, or whose activity he organises, directs or controls in his own interest …’
Finnish: ”1355 §:n mukaan henkilö on lain nojalla välittömästi vastuussa vahingoista, jotka ovat aiheuttaneet ne, joiden elintapoja henkilö sääntelee tai joiden toimintaa henkilö järjestää, ohjaa tai valvoo oman etunsa mukaisesti.”
English: The second paragraph of Article 1360 of the preliminary draft defines this principle in the case of the liability of the parent company of a group of companies in relation to its subsidiaries: ‘Article 1360
Finnish: Alustavan luonnoksen 1360 §:n 2 momentissa vahvistetaan tämä periaate silloin, kun konsernin emoyhtiö on vastuussa tytäryrityksiinsä nähden:
English: Likewise, a person shall also be liable where he controls the economic activity or assets of a professional person who is in a situation of dependence even though acting for his own account, if the victim shows that the act giving rise to the damage is related to the exercise of control. This shall apply in particular to parent companies in respect of damage caused by their subsidiaries, and to licensors for damage caused by their licensees’ (emphasis added.)
Finnish: ”1360 §:n mukaan vastuussa on myös se, joka valvoo riippuvuussuhteessa olevan ammattihenkilön taloudellista toimintaa tai omaisuutta, vaikka hän toimisi omissa nimissään, jos uhri toteaa, että vahinko liittyy valvonnan harjoittamiseen. Tämä pätee erityisesti emoyhtiöihin niiden tytäryritysten aiheuttamissa vahingoissa ja oikeuden luovuttajiin niiden käyttöoikeuden haltijoiden aiheuttamissa vahingoissa” (alleviivaus lisätty).
English: 2007 […] (*) […] (*) […] (*) 2008 […] (*) […] (*) […] (*) 2009 […] (*) […] (*) […] (*)
Finnish: IFP:n tutkimustyö Prosernatin yksinoikeudellisella alalla tuotti siis taloudellista toimintaa […] (*) euron arvosta vuonna 2007, […] (*) euron arvosta vuonna 2008 ja […] (*) euron arvosta vuonna 2009.
English: This name change was made by Article 81 of Law No 2010-788 of 12 July 2010 on national commitment to the environment (loi portant engagement national pour l’environnement) (the ‘Grenelle 2 Law’). (IFP press release of 13 July 2010, available at Internet site http://www.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/actualites/communiques-de-presse/, site consulted on 28 June 2011).
Portuguese: O artigo 81. o da Lei n.o 2010-788, de 12 de Julho de 2010, referente ao compromisso nacional relativo ao meio ambiente (a chamada «Lei Grenelle 2») estabelecia essa alteração da denominação (Comunicado de imprensa do estabelecimento público IFP de 13 de Julho de 2010, disponível no sítio Internet http://www.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/actualites/communiques-de-presse/ em 28 de Junho de 2011).
Finnish: Nimimuutos tehtiin kansallisesta ympäristösitoumuksesta 12 päivänä heinäkuuta 2010 annetun lain nro 2010–788 (Grenelle 2 -laki) 81 §:n nojalla (IFP:n lehdistötiedote, 13.7.2010, saatavilla internet-osoitteessa http://www.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/actualites/communiques-de-presse/ 28.6.2011).
Slovenian: Ta sprememba imena je bila izvedena s členom 81 zakona št. 2010-788 z dne 12. julija 2010 o nacionalni okoljski zavezi (imenovan „Loi Grenelle 2“) (Obvestilo za javnost osebe javnega prava IFP z dne 13. julija 2010, na voljo na spletnem mestu http://www.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/actualites/communiques-de-presse/ od 28. junija 2011).
Lithuanian: Šis pavadinimas pakeistas 2010 m. liepos 12 d. Įstatymo Nr. 2010-788 dėl nacionalinių įsipareigojimų aplinkos srityje (Įstatymo Grenelle 2) 81 straipsniu (2010 m. liepos 13 d. viešosios įstaigos IFP pranešimas spaudai, kuris 2011 m. birželio 28 d. paskelbtas interneto svetainėje http://www.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/actualites/communiques-de-presse/).
English: 2001-20, No 256; Com. 8 January 2002, Act. proc. coll. 2002-6, No 70.
French: 2002, Act. proc. coll. 2002-6, no 70.
Hungarian: 2001–20., 256. sz.; Com., 2002. január 8., Act. proc. coll., 2002–6., 70. sz.
English: Delebecque, ‘Groupes de sociétés et procédures collectives: confusion de patrimoines et responsabilités des membres du groupe’, Rev. proc. coll. 1998/2, p. 129, see in particular No 14.
French: Delebecque, «Groupes de sociétés et procédures collectives: confusion de patrimoines et responsabilités des membres du groupe», Rev. proc. coll. 1998/2, p. 129, spéc. n o 14.
Portuguese: Delebecque, «Groupes de sociétés et procédures collectives: confusion de patrimoines et responsabilités des membres du groupe», Revue des procédures collectives 1998/2, p. 129, especialmente n.o 14.
Lithuanian: Delebecque, „Groupes de sociétés et procédures collectives: confusion de patrimoines et responsabilités des membres du groupe“, Revue des procédures collectives, 1998/2, p. 129, spec. Nr. 14.
English: The French authorities also further deny that any possibility of compensation of creditors that may be opened up if the State is held liable can be considered equivalent to a guarantee. The Commission takes the view, however, that, in the procedure for the recovery of the debts of the public bodies referred to in the Law of 16 July 1980, the liability of the State, with or without fault, is indeed equivalent to a guarantee mechanism for purposes of European Union law, because it ensures creditors that if IFP should default the State will be required to meet their claims.
Hungarian: A francia hatóságok vitatják azt is, hogy a felelősségvállalás révén a hitelezők számára biztosított kártérítési lehetőségek garanciához hasonlíthatók A Bizottság ezzel szemben úgy ítéli meg, hogy az állam (vétkességen alapuló vagy objektív) felelősségvállalása az 1980. július 16-i törvényben említett közjogi személyek tartozásainak visszafizettetésére irányuló eljárás végrehajtása során az európai uniós jog alkalmazásában garanciamechanizmussal egyenértékű, mivel olyan módon biztosítja a hitelezőket a követelésük kifizetéséről, hogy az IFP közintézmény nemteljesítése esetén az államot kötelezi annak megtérítésére.
English: Moreover, for any one customer, the services invoiced are usually for an amount below EUR […] (*) in turnover, which means that the estimated maximum amount of aid usually remains negligible, in the order of EUR […] (*) per contract. Consequently, in the Commission’s view, the aid at issue is proportionate to the objective in the general interest which is the dissemination of scientific knowledge in the European Union.
Hungarian: Ezenfelül, a kiszámlázott szolgáltatások ügyfelekre lebontva közölt összege gyakran kevesebb mint […] (*) EUR forgalmat eredményez, így a támogatás becsült legmagasabb összege a legtöbb esetben elhanyagolható, szerződésenként […] (*) EUR. Ennélfogva a Bizottság úgy ítéli meg, hogy az érintett támogatás arányos a tudományos ismeretek Európai Unión belüli terjesztésének általános érdekű célkitűzésével.
English: Cf. Article L. 641-4, first subparagraph, of the Commercial Code. The second subparagraph of the same Article specifies that unsecured claims (i.e. those not covered by any particular guarantee) are not verified in principle if it is clear that the proceeds of the asset sales will be totally absorbed by legal fees and preferential claims.
Hungarian: A felszámolási ítélet közzétételét követően az IFP közintézmény érintett leányvállalata azon hitelezőinek, akiknek követelése az eljárást megindító ítéletet megelőzően keletkezett, az eljárás megindításáról szóló ítéletnek a Polgári és Kereskedelmi Hirdetmények Hivatalos Közlönyében (BODACC) történő kihirdetését követő két hónapon belül a követeléseikre vonatkozó nyilatkozatot kell eljuttatniuk a hitelezők képviselőjéhez.
English: EPICs are subject to the Law of 16 July 1980 and its implementing rules. These expressly identify the State as the authority responsible for covering the debts of publicly owned establishments. They confer on it important prerogatives, such as the issuing of a mandatory payment order and the creation of sufficient resources, and organise a principle of last-resort State liability for the debts of legal entities governed by public law.
Italian: Sono invece applicabili agli EPIC la legge del 16 luglio 1980 e i relativi testi attuativi, che designano esplicitamente lo Stato come autorità competente per il ripianamento dei debiti degli organismi pubblici, conferendo ad essi considerevoli poteri come l'emissione di ordini di pagamento e la costituzione di risorse sufficienti, e definiscono un principio di responsabilità dello Stato in ultima istanza rispetto ai debiti delle persone giuridiche di diritto pubblico.
English: Concerning the second objection, the French authorities recognise that statute law and regulations take precedence over contracts, and that a disputed clause can always be annulled. However, they consider that the objection does not in fact refer to any higher-ranking text, that it is not substantiated, and therefore has no weight.
Italian: per quanto riguarda la seconda obiezione, le autorità francesi riconoscono che la legge e il regolamento prevalgono sul contratto, e che una clausola controversa può sempre essere annullata, tuttavia ritengono che tale obiezione non eccepisca un testo di rango superiore, che non sia avvalorata e che non abbia alcuna portata giuridica;
English: As explained in recitals 142 to 145 of decision C 56/2007, to which it refers mutatis mutandis, the Commission does not share the interpretation put forward by the French authorities that this opinion of the Council of State cannot be transposed to the case of IFP. The opinion makes no reference to the aims of the establishment or to whether or not a public accountant is present within it.
Italian: Come spiegato ai considerando da 142 a 145 della decisione C 56/2007 summenzionata, ai quali essa rimanda mutatis mutandis, la Commissione non condivide l'interpretazione delle autorità francesi, secondo cui questo parere del Consiglio di Stato non potrebbe essere trasposto all'ente pubblico IFP, sottolineando in particolare che questo parere non fa riferimento alcuno alla finalità dell'organismo, né alla presenza o meno di un contabile pubblico in seno all'organismo pubblico.
English: In the same letter of 28 November 2008 UOP’s legal advisers sought permission for their client to submit additional comments in the course of the proceeding. By letter dated 17 December 2008, the Commission acceded to this request, agreeing to extend the deadline for UOP’s reply until 23 January 2009 to enable it to submit any additional comments.
Lithuanian: Komisija į šį prašymą atsakė 2008 m. gruodžio 17 d. raštu – ji sutiko bendrovės UOP Limited atsakymo pateikimo terminą pratęsti iki 2009 m. sausio 23 d., kad bendrovė galėtų pateikti papildomas pastabas.
English: By letter dated 2 June 2009, the French authorities requested that this time limit be extended until 22 June 2009, since, in their view, the comments submitted by the third party required detailed and in-depth analysis and the consultation of several ministerial departments. By letter dated 9 June 2009, the Commission agreed to this extension until 22 June 2009. By letter dated 22 June 2009, the French authorities forwarded their observations on the comments made by UOP.
Lithuanian: 2009 m. birželio 9 d. raštu Komisija sutiko šį terminą pratęsti iki 2009 m. birželio 22 d. Prancūzijos institucijos pastabas dėl bendrovės UOP Limited pastabų pateikė 2009 m. birželio 22 d. raštu.
English: By letter dated 29 July 2009, the Commission asked the French authorities for additional information, requesting a reply by 24 August 2009. By letter dated 19 August 2009, the French authorities asked for an extension until 7 September 2009, to which the Commission acceded by letter dated 20 August 2009.
Lithuanian: 2009 m. liepos 29 d. raštu Komisija Prancūzijos institucijų paprašė papildomos informacijos ir paragino atsakymą pateikti iki 2009 m. rugpjūčio 24 d.2009 m. rugpjūčio 19 d. raštu Prancūzijos institucijos paprašė suteikti papildomą atsakymo pateikimo terminą iki 2009 m. rugsėjo 7 d.; Komisija šį terminą suteikė 2009 m. rugpjūčio 20 d. raštu.
English: The French authorities consider that in its dealings with banks and financial institutions IFP has so far drawn no economic advantage from its EPIC status. They provide evidence to show that: (i) over the long term, IFP recorded zero debt in the years 2005, 2006 and 2007 [56] and in 2008 and 2009, (ii) over the medium term, although IFP each year negotiated overdraft facilities with various banking institutions, it obtained rates comparable to market rates and in any case has never made use of these credit lines, and finally (iii) over the short term, IFP’s debt was close to zero or at zero during the period under review.
Lithuanian: Dėl viešosios įstaigos IFP ryšių su bankais ir finansų įstaigomis Prancūzijos institucijos mano, kad iki šiol viešoji įstaiga IFP dėl turimo PKVĮ statuso negavo jokio ekonominio pranašumo.
English: The Commission emphasises that the change of legal form of the publicly owned establishment IFP occurred on 7 July 2006, i.e. after the entry into force of the Organic Law governing the Finance Act. Under such circumstances, it is not necessary to examine the arguments put forward by the French authorities’ expert in the postal case regarding debts contracted before 1 January 2005, despite the fact that the French authorities refer to this mutatis mutandis in their comments.
Lithuanian: Komisija pabrėžia, kad viešosios įstaigos IFP statusas pakeistas 2006 m. liepos 7 d. – po to, kai įsigaliojo PĮFĮ.
English: The cover provided by the State guarantee for the technology transfer activities carried out by the publicly owned establishment IFP in the fields provided for by the exclusive agreements concluded with its subsidiaries Axens and Prosernat referred to in Article 3(1) of the Commission decision of 16 July 2008 on the aid measure implemented by France for the IFP group (‘decision C 51/2005’) constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. 5. The cover provided by the State guarantee for the contract research and other services performed by the publicly owned establishment IFP, on behalf of both third parties and the subsidiaries, constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. Article 2 In the event of any amendment of the agreement between the publicly owned establishment IFP and its subsidiary Beicip-Franlab referred to in Article 1(3), France shall notify the agreement to the Commission, taking account of any impact of the State guarantee in order to assess the total amount of any public funding, unless the new contractual terms allow the presence of State aid to be ruled out.
Lithuanian: Valstybės garantija, taikoma technologijų perdavimo veiklai, kurią viešoji įstaiga IFP vykdo srityse, numatytose su patronuojamosiomis bendrovėmis Axens bei Prosernat sudarytose išimtinėse sutartyse, minėtose 2008 m. liepos 16 d. Komisijos sprendimo dėl valstybės pagalbos, kurią Prancūzija suteikė IFP grupei (toliau – Sprendimas Nr. C 51/2005) 3 straipsnio 1 dalyje, yra valstybės pagalba pagal SESV 107 straipsnio 1 dalį.
English: Article 3 In the period between 7 July 2006 and 31 December 2009, the cover provided by the State guarantee for the economic activities referred to in Article 1(4) and (5) constituted aid compatible with the internal market. Article 4 From 1 January 2010 onward, and until the date of expiry of the exclusive agreements between the publicly owned establishment IFP and its subsidiaries Axens and Prosernat referred to in Article 3(1) of decision C 51/2005, the cover provided by the State guarantee for the economic activities referred to in Article 1(4) of this decision constitutes aid compatible with the internal market, subject to compliance with the conditions in Articles 5 and 6 of this decision. Article 5
Lithuanian: Valstybės garantija, taikoma su viešosios įstaigos IFP paslaugomis ir pagal sutartis atliekamais moksliniais tyrimais susijusiai veiklai, vykdomai tiek trečiųjų šalių, tiek patronuojamųjų bendrovių sąskaita, yra valstybės pagalba pagal SESV 107 straipsnio 1 dalį.
English: The annual financial report shall include the value of the economic activities referred to in Article 1(4) and (5) carried out by the publicly owned establishment IFP during the year under review, and a maximum estimate of the gross grant equivalent of the aid resulting from the lack of payment of a premium corresponding to a performance bond or, at the very least a best efforts guarantee, offered to the beneficiaries of the above-mentioned economic services. This estimate shall be made either by applying a flat rate of 5 % to the value of the services provided or on the basis of a more precise methodology approved in advance by the Commission. Article 6
Lithuanian: Metinėje finansinėje ataskaitoje nurodoma prekių ir paslaugų, kurias viešoji įstaiga IFP iš tiekėjų įsigijo siekdama atitinkamais metais teikti šio sprendimo 1 straipsnio 4 ir 5 dalyse minėtas ekonomines paslaugas, suma ir didžiausias pagalbos, gautos dėl to, kad tiekėjai palankiau vertino įmonės įsipareigojimų neįvykdymo riziką, bendrojo subsidijos ekvivalento įvertis.
English: As regards de facto management, it should be pointed out that a parent company will not systematically be considered a de facto manager, and the court considering the particular case will require precise actions which can be imputed to the parent company and which show that, without legal entitlement, it has directly or indirectly carried out a positive and independent activity in the administration of the subsidiary; see in particular Com. 9 May 1978, D. 1979. 419, note M. Vasseur.
Lithuanian: Dėl faktinio vadovavimo pažymėtina, kad patronuojančiosios bendrovės nesistemingai laikomos faktiškai vadovaujančiomis, vertinimą in concreto atliekantis teisėjas reikalauja nurodyti konkrečius veiksmus, kurie galėtų būti priskirti kontroliuojančiajai bendrovei, ir įrodo, kad administruodama patronuojamąją bendrovę ji neteisėtai tiesiogiai ar netiesiogiai vykdė teigiamą ir nepriklausomą veiklą; visų pirma žr. 1978 m. gegužės 9 d. Kasacinio teismo Komercinių bylų sprendimą, Dalloz, 1979, 419, M. Vasseuro pranešimas.
English: Rives-Langes, ‘La notion de dirigeant de fait’, D. 1975. chron. 41; D. Tricot, ‘Les critères de la gestion de fait’, Dr. et patr. January 1996, p. 24, cited by B. Grimonprez, cited above, point 13.
Portuguese: Rives-Langes, «La notion de dirigeant de fait», D. 1975, Crónica 41; D. Tricot, «Les critères de la gestion de fait», Droit et Patrimoine, Janeiro de 1996, p. 24, citado por B. Grimonprez, op. cit., ponto 13.
Slovenian: Rives-Langes, La notion de dirigeant de fait (Pojem dejanskega upravitelja), D. 1975. kronika 41; D. Tricot, Les critères de la gestion de fait (Merila dejanskega upravljanja), Dr. et patr. jan. 1996, str. 24, citirano v B. Grimonprez, op. cit., točka 13.
Lithuanian: Rives-Langes, La notion de dirigeant de fait, Dalloz, 1975, kronika Nr. 41; D. Tricot, Les critères de la gestion de fait, leidinys Droit et patrimoine, 1996 m. sausio mėn., p. 24, – šis straipsnis cituojamas minėto B. Grimonprez straipsnio 13 punkte.
English: Debts contracted since 1 January 2005 are therefore not covered by an implied guarantee. As for debts incurred before 1 January 2005, the expert takes the view that, in the absence of a court judgment, it is impossible to determine whether it might be held that implied guarantees given before 1 January 2005 which were not expressly authorised by a finance act retain their validity on the basis of respect for the constitutionally protected rights of creditors.
Latvian: Attiecībā uz parādsaistībām, kuras uzņemtas kopš 2005. gada 1. janvāra, eksperts uzskata, ka, tā kā nav lēmuma par strīdu izskatīšanu, attiecīgi nav iespējams noteikt, vai pirms 2005. gada 1. janvāra piešķirto netiešo garantiju, kuru piešķiršana nebija skaidri paredzēta finanšu tiesību aktos, spēkā esību ir iespējams atcelt, pamatojoties uz kreditoru tiesībām, kas ir aizsargātas konstitūcijā.