FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: This trend is confirmed by the European Commission’s Green Paper of March 2011 [60].
French: Cette tendance se précise dans le livre vert de la Commission européenne de mars 2011 [60].
German: Dieser Trend wird im Grünbuch der Europäischen Kommission vom März 2011 [60] bestätigt.
Spanish: El Libro Verde de la Comisión Europea de marzo de 2011 [60] confirma esta tendencia.
Italian: Questa tendenza è confermata dal libro verde della Commissione europea del marzo 2011 [60].
Portuguese: Esta tendência é confirmada pelo Livro Verde da Comissão Europeia de março de 2011 [60].
Dutch: Deze tendens wordt bevestigd in het groenboek van de Europese Commissie van maart 2011 [60].
Danish: Det er en tendens, der bekræftes i Europa-Kommissionens grønbog fra marts 2011 [60].
Swedish: Denna trend bekräftas i Europeiska kommissionens grönbok från mars 2011 [60].
Finnish: Euroopan komission maaliskuussa 2011 julkistamassa vihreässä kirjassa vahvistetaan tämä suuntaus [60].
Greek: Αυτή η τάση επιβεβαιώνεται από την Πράσινη Βίβλο της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής του Μαρτίου 2011 [60].
Czech: Tento trend potvrzuje zelená kniha Evropské komise z března 2011 [60].
Slovak: Tento trend sa potvrdzuje aj v zelenej knihe Európskej komisie z marca 2011 [60].
Polish: Trend ten potwierdza zielona księga Komisji Europejskiej z marca 2011 r. [60].
Hungarian: Ezt a tendenciát az Európai Bizottság 2011. márciusi zöld könyve is megerősíti [60].
Slovenian: Ta trend potrjuje Zelena knjiga Evropske komisije iz marca 2011 [60].
Romanian: Această tendință este confirmată de Cartea verde a Comisiei Europene din martie 2011 [60].
Estonian: Seda suundumust kinnitatakse Euroopa Komisjoni 2011. aasta märtsi rohelises raamatus [60].
Latvian: Šo tendenci apstiprina Eiropas Komisijas 2011. gada marta Zaļā grāmata [60].
Lithuanian: Ši tendencija patvirtinta Europos Komisijos 2011 m. kovo mėn. žaliojoje knygoje [60].
Maltese: Din it-tendenza hija kkonfermata mill-Green Paper tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea ta’ Marzu 2011 [60].
English: Infringement proceedings No 2003/4365.
French: Procédure d’infraction no 2003/4365.
German: Vertragsverletzungsverfahren Nr. 2003/4365.
Spanish: Procedimiento de infracción no 2003/4365.
Italian: Procedura d’infrazione n. 2003/4365.
Portuguese: Processo por infração n.o 2003/4365.
Dutch: Inbreukprocedure nr. 2003/4365.
Danish: Overtrædelsesprocedure nr. 2003/4365.
Swedish: Överträdelseförfarande nr 2003/4365.
Finnish: Rikkomismenettely nro 2003/4365.
Greek: Διαδικασία παράβασης αριθ. 2003/4365.
Czech: Řízení pro porušení Smlouvy č. 2003/4365.
Slovak: Konanie vo veci porušenia č. 2003/4365.
Polish: Postępowanie w sprawie uchybienia zobowiązaniom państwa członkowskiego nr 2003/4365.
Hungarian: 2003/4365. sz. jogsértési eljárások.
Slovenian: Postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev št. 2003/4365.
Romanian: Procedura privind încălcarea dreptului UE nr. 2003/4365.
Estonian: Rikkumismenetlus nr 2003/4365.
Latvian: Pārkāpumu konstatēšanas procedūra Nr. 2003/4365.
Lithuanian: Pažeidimo tyrimo procedūra Nr. 2003/4365.
Maltese: Proċeduri ta’ ksur Nru 2003/4365.
English: See also IP/07/360.
French: Voir également IP/07/360.
German: Siehe auch IP/07/360.
Spanish: Véase también IP/07/360.
Italian: Cfr. anche IP/07/360.
Portuguese: Ver também IP/07/360.
Dutch: Zie ook IP/07/360.
Danish: Se også IP/07/360.
Swedish: Se också IP/07/360.
Finnish: Katso myös IP/07/360.
Greek: Βλέπε επίσης IP/07/360.
Czech: Viz také IP/07/360.
Slovak: Pozri aj IP/07/360.
Polish: Zob. również IP/07/360.
Hungarian: Lásd még: IP/07/360.
Slovenian: Glej tudi IP/07/360.
Romanian: A se vedea, de asemenea, IP/07/360.
Estonian: Vt ka pressiteade IP/07/360.
Latvian: Sk. arī IP/07/360.
Lithuanian: Taip pat žr. IP/07/360.
Maltese: Ara wkoll IP/07/360.
English: European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2009 on the integrity of online gambling. (2008/22125(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
French: Résolution du Parlement européen du 10 mars 2009 sur l’intégrité des jeux d’argent en ligne, [2008/22125(INI)], P6-2009-0097.
German: Entschließung des Europäischen Parlaments vom 10. März 2009 zu der Integrität von Online-Glücksspielen (2008/2215(INI)); P6-2009-0097.
Spanish: Resolución del Parlamento Europeo, de 10 de marzo de 2009, sobre la integridad de los juegos de azar en línea [2008/22125(INI)], P6-2009-0097.
Italian: Risoluzione del Parlamento europeo del 10 marzo 2009 sull’integrità del gioco d’azzardo on line [2008/22125(INI)], P6-2009-0097.
Portuguese: Resolução do Parlamento Europeu, de 10 de março de 2009, sobre a integridade dos jogos de apostas em linha [2008/2215(INI)]; P6-2009-0097.
Dutch: Resolutie van het Europees Parlement van 10 maart 2009 over de integriteit bij onlinegokken (2008/22125(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
Danish: Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 10. marts 2009 om sikkerhed ved onlinespil, (2008/22125(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
Finnish: Euroopan parlamentin päätöslauselma, hyväksytty 10 päivänä maaliskuuta 2009, online-rahapelien yhtenäisyydestä (2008/22125(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
Greek: Ψήφισμα του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου της 10ης Μαρτίου 2009 σχετικά με την ασφάλεια στα διαδικτυακά τυχερά παιχνίδια, [2008/22125(INI)], P6-2009-0097.
Czech: Usnesení Evropského parlamentu ze dne 10. března 2009 o etické nezávadnosti hazardních her poskytovaných on-line (2008/22125(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
Polish: Rezolucja Parlamentu Europejskiego z dnia 10 marca 2009 r. w sprawie gier losowych on-line (2008/2215(INI)); P6-2009-0097.
Slovenian: Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. marca 2009 o neoporečnosti spletnih iger na srečo, (2008/22125(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
Estonian: Euroopa Parlamendi 10. märtsi 2009. aasta resolutsioon online-hasartmängude usaldusväärsuse kohta; (2008/2215(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
Lithuanian: 2009 m. kovo 10 d. Europos Parlamento rezoliucija dėl azartinių lošimų internete patikimumo (2008/22125(INI)), P6–2009–0097.
Maltese: Ir-Riżoluzzjoni tal-Parlament Ewropew tal-10 ta’ Marzu 2009 dwar l-integrità tal-logħob tal-azzard onlajn (2008/2215(INI)), P6-2009-0097.
English: Article 5 of the Gaming Act defines online gambling as ‘gambling entered into between a player and a gambling provider using remote communication’. The same provision defines land-based gambling as ‘gambling that is entered into by a player and a gambling supplier, or the suppliers’ agent, meeting physically’. Betting services are defined as ‘activities where a participant has a chance of winning a prize and where a bet is placed on the result of a future event or the occurrence of a future event’.
Danish: I § 5 i lov om spil defineres onlinespil som »spil, der indgås mellem en spiller og en spiludbyder ved brug af fjernkommunikation«. I samme bestemmelse defineres landbaserede spil som »spil, der indgås, ved at en spiller og en spiludbyder eller spiludbyderens forhandler mødes fysisk«. Væddemål defineres som »aktiviteter, hvor en deltager har en chance for at vinde en gevinst, og hvor der væddes om resultatet af en fremtidig begivenhed eller indtræffelse af en fremtidig hændelse«.
English: With regard to the use of ‘blocking systems’, the Commission Green Paper states that the efficiency of blocking systems depends on a pre-defined and updated list of items to block as well as efficient software systems. However, as the Danish authorities pointed out, it is questionable whether these blocking systems could produce the expected results, since online gamblers could circumvent Internet blocking by changing the ‘ports’ used and prohibiting certain payments could block perfectly lawful commercial transactions other than payments relating to stakes and prizes.
Danish: Med hensyn til anvendelsen af »blokeringssystemer« fremgår det af ovennævnte grønbog fra Kommissionen, at effektiviteten af et blokeringssystem beror på en forud fastsat og ajourført liste over elementer, der skal blokeres, samt på effektiv software. Som de danske myndigheder imidlertid påpegede, er det tvivlsomt, om disse blokeringssystemer kan sikre de forventede resultater, da onlinespillere kan undgå internetblokeringen ved at ændre de anvendte »porte«, og blokeringen af visse betalinger kunne i øvrigt blokere lovlige handelstransaktioner, som ikke vedrører betaling for væddemål og udbetaling af gevinster.
English: Autorité de la concurrence française, Avis 11-A-02 du 20 janvier 2011.
German: Autorité de la Concurrence Française (französische Kartellbehörde), Mitteilung 11-A-02 vom 20. Januar 2011.
Spanish: Autorité de la concurrence française, Dictamen 11-A-02 de 20 de enero de 2011.
Italian: Autorité de la concurrence française, parere 11-A-02 del 20 gennaio 2011.
Portuguese: Autorité de la Concurrence Française, Avis 11-A02 du 20 janvier 2011.
Danish: Autorité de la concurrence française, Avis 11-A-02 af 20. januar 2011.
Finnish: Autorité de la concurrence française, Avis 11-A-02 du 20 janvier 2011 (Ranskan kilpailuviranomaisen lausunto 11-A-02, annettu 20 päivänä tammikuuta 2011).
Greek: Autorité de la Concurrence Française, Avis 11-A-02 της 20ής Ιανουαρίου 2011.
Slovak: Autorité de la concurrence française, Avis 11-A-02 z 20. januára 2011.
Polish: Autorité de la concurrence française, Avis 11-A-02 du 20 janvier 2011 [francuski Urząd ds. Konkurencji, opinia 11-A-02 z dnia 20 stycznia 2011 r.].
Slovenian: Autorité de la Concurrence Française, Avis 11-A-02 z dne 20. januarja 2011.
Estonian: Autorité de la Concurrence Française, Avis 11-A-02, 20. jaanuar 2011.
Lithuanian: Autorité de la Concurrence Française, Avis 11-A-02, 2011 m. sausio 20 d.
Maltese: Autorité de la concurrence française, Avis 11-A-02 tal-20 ta’ Jannar 2011.
English: The Commission also received two separate complaints with regard to the proposed Gaming Duties Act. The first was submitted by the Danish Amusement Machine Industry Association (‘DAB’) on 23 July 2010. The second complaint was submitted by a land-based casino operator, ‘the Royal Casino’, on 6 August 2010.
German: Bei der Kommission gingen außerdem zwei Beschwerden in Bezug auf das vorgeschlagene Glücksspielsteuergesetz ein: am 23. Juli 2010 die Beschwerde des dänischen Verbands der Spielautomatenhersteller („DAB“) und am 6. August 2010 die Beschwerde einer herkömmlichen Spielbank („Royal Casino“).
Lithuanian: Komisija taip pat gavo du atskirus skundus dėl siūlomo Azartinių lošimų mokesčių įstatymo: vieną jų 2010 m. liepos 23 d. pateikė Danijos žaidimų automatų gamintojų asociacija (DAB), kitą 2010 m. rugpjūčio 6 d. – realių lošimo namų (kazino) valdytojas „Royal Casino“.
English: When assessing a measure’s compatibility with the internal market, the Commission balances its positive impact in terms of attaining an objective of common interest against its potentially negative side effects, such as distortion of trade and competition. This test is based on a three-stage examination.
German: Bei der Prüfung der Vereinbarkeit einer Maßnahme mit dem Binnenmarkt wägt die Kommission den positiven Beitrag einer Beihilfe zur Verwirklichung eines Ziels von gemeinsamem Interesse mit den möglichen negativen Folgen in Form einer Verfälschung des Handels und des Wettbewerbs ab.
Hungarian: Egy intézkedés belső piaccal való összeegyeztethetőségének értékelésekor a Bizottság a közös érdekű célkitűzés megvalósítását szolgáló kedvező hatásokat összeveti a lehetséges kedvezőtlen hatásokkal, például a kereskedelem és a verseny torzulásával.
Lithuanian: Komisija, vertindama priemonės suderinamumą su vidaus rinka, lygina jos teigiamą poveikį siekiant bendruosius interesus atitinkančio tikslo su jos galimu neigiamu šalutiniu poveikiu, kaip antai prekybos ir konkurencijos iškraipymu.
English: The Member States are therefore free to set the objectives of their policy on betting and gambling and, where appropriate, to define in detail the level of protection sought. However, the restrictive measures that they impose must satisfy the conditions laid down in the case law of the Court as regards their proportionality (Placanica and Others, paragraph 48).
German: Somit steht es den Mitgliedstaaten zwar frei, die Ziele ihrer Politik auf dem Gebiet der Glücksspiele festzulegen und gegebenenfalls das angestrebte Schutzniveau genau zu bestimmen, doch müssen die von ihnen vorgeschriebenen Beschränkungen den sich aus der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs ergebenden Anforderungen an ihre Verhältnismäßigkeit genügen (Urteil Placanica u. a., Randnr. 48).
English: Under the Gaming Act, ‘supplying or arranging gambling requires a licence unless this Act or other legislation provides otherwise’. In addition, the provision or arranging of gambling is subject to the payment of duty (Article 1 of the Gaming Duties Act).
Greek: Από το νόμο για τα τυχερά παιχνίδια προκύπτει ότι «η παροχή ή η διοργάνωση τυχερών παιχνιδιών απαιτεί άδεια, εκτός εάν προβλέπεται διαφορετικά από τον παρόντα νόμο ή άλλη νομοθεσία.» Επιπλέον, η παροχή ή η διοργάνωση τυχερών παιχνιδιών υπόκειται σε φόρο (άρθρο 1 του νόμου για τους φόρους επί των τυχερών παιχνιδιών).
English: Nor could such selectivity be justified by the logic of the tax system. Moreover, they consider that imposing a higher tax rate would not discourage online providers to apply for a licence in Denmark.
Greek: Αυτή η επιλεκτικότητα δεν μπορεί επιπλέον να δικαιολογηθεί από τη λογική του φορολογικού συστήματος Επίσης δεν πιστεύουν ότι η εισαγωγή ενός υψηλότερου φόρου θα εμπόδιζε τους διαδικτυακούς φορείς να υποβάλλουν αίτηση για άδεια στη Δανία.
English: The first was submitted by the Danish Amusement Machine Industry Association (‘DAB’) on 23 July 2010. The second complaint was submitted by a land-based casino operator, ‘the Royal Casino’, on 6 August 2010.
Spanish: La primera fue presentada por la Dansk Automat Brancheforening (DAB, Asociación danesa del sector de las máquinas recreativas) el 23 de julio de 2010 y la segunda, por un operador de un casino tradicional, Royal Casino, el día 6 de agosto de 2010.
Italian: La prima è stata presentata il 23 luglio 2010 dall’associazione danese dei produttori di apparecchi da intrattenimento («DAB»), la seconda il 6 agosto 2010 dal gestore di una casa da gioco «tradizionale» (non «on line») — il «Royal Casino».
English: With regard to the aims of the notified Act, the Danish authorities reject the argument of certain interested parties that the notified Act is aimed at attracting foreign gambling providers. Rather, the objectives pursued by the government are the those listed in the Gaming Act.
Spanish: Con respecto a los objetivos de la Ley notificada, las autoridades danesas rechazan el argumento aducido por ciertas partes interesadas de que la Ley notificada pretende atraer a proveedores de servicios de juego extranjeros, y defienden que los objetivos perseguidos por el Gobierno son los que la Ley del juego contempla.
Italian: Per quanto concerne gli scopi della legge notificata, le autorità danesi respingono la tesi sostenuta da talune parti interessate secondo la quale la legge notificata mirerebbe ad attirare gli operatori di gioco d’azzardo stranieri, ribadendo che gli obiettivi perseguiti dal governo sono piuttosto quelli elencati dalla legge relativa ai giochi.
Polish: W odniesieniu do celów zgłoszonej ustawy władze duńskie odrzucają argument niektórych zainteresowanych stron, że zgłoszona ustawa ma na celu przyciągnięcie zagranicznych operatorów gier hazardowych. natomiast celami założonymi przez rząd są cele wymienione w ustawie o grach.
English: In the light of the foregoing arguments, the Commission recalls that, according to case law [47] and the Commission Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation [48], a Member State has to establish whether the measure under consideration derives from the basic or guiding principles of that system. A justification based on the nature or overall structure of the tax system in question constitutes an exception to the principle that State aid is prohibited.
French: À la lumière des arguments ci-dessus, la Commission rappelle qu’un État membre, selon la jurisprudence [47] et la communication de la Commission sur l’application des règles relatives aux aides d’État aux mesures relevant de la fiscalité directe des entreprises [48], doit justifier que la mesure en question découle des principes fondamentaux du système.
Spanish: A la luz de los argumentos mencionados, la Comisión recuerda que, de conformidad con la jurisprudencia [47] y la Comunicación de la Comisión relativa a la aplicación de las normas sobre ayudas estatales a las medidas relacionadas con la fiscalidad directa de las empresas [48], corresponde al Estado miembro establecer si la medida en cuestión se aparta de los principios básicos o directrices de ese sistema.
Italian: Alla luce delle argomentazioni di cui sopra, la Commissione ricorda che, secondo la giurisprudenza [47] e la comunicazione della Commissione sull’applicazione delle norme relative agli aiuti di Stato alle misure di tassazione diretta delle imprese [48], uno Stato membro deve stabilire se la misura in questione deriva dai principi di base o orientativi di tale sistema.
Portuguese: À luz dos argumentos acima referidos, a Comissão recorda que, de acordo com a jurisprudência [47] e com a Comunicação da Comissão sobre a aplicação das regras relativas aos auxílios estatais às medidas que respeitam à fiscalidade direta das empresas [48], um Estado-Membro deve estabelecer se a medida em consideração emana diretamente dos princípios fundadores ou orientadores do sistema fiscal.
English: For an English version of the memorandum, see Annex B to the Danish authorities’ observations of 14 January 2011 on the initiating decision. The Danish version of the memorandum can be found in Annex 20 to the Danish authorities’ notification of 6 July 2010.
Finnish: Muistion englanninkielinen versio on Tanskan viranomaisten aloittamispäätöksestä 14 päivänä tammikuuta 2011 esittämien huomautusten liitteessä B. Muistion tanskankielinen versio on Tanskan viranomaisten 6 päivänä heinäkuuta 2010 antaman ilmoituksen liitteessä 20.
English: Case T-308/00 Salzgitter v Commission of the European Communities [2004] ECR II-1933, paragraph 81. The wording of this paragraph is as follows: ‘Consequently, in order to identify what constitutes an advantage as contemplated in the case-law on State aid, it is imperative to determine the reference point in the scheme in question against which that advantage is to be compared. In the present case, when a “normal” tax burden with the meaning of the aforementioned case laws is being determined, comparing the tax rules applicable in all of the Member States, or even some of them, would inevitably distort the aid and functioning of the provisions on the monitoring of State aid. In the absence of Community-level harmonisation of the tax provisions of the Member States, such an approach would in effect compare different factual and legal situations arising from legislative and regulatory disparities between the Member States. The information provided by the applicant in the present case illustrates, moreover, the disparity which exists between the Member States, particularly as regards tax bases and rates of taxation on capital goods. ’ Commission Decision C2/09 MoRaKG, Conditions for Capital Investment (OJ C 60, 14.3.2009, p. 9), paragraph 25.
French: Affaire T-308/00, Salzgitter contre Commission des Communautés européennes, Recueil 2004 II, p. 1933, point 81, libellé comme suit: «Par conséquent, pour identifier ce que constitue un avantage, au sens de la jurisprudence relative à la notion d’aide d’État, il est impératif de déterminer le point de référence, dans le cadre d’un régime juridique donné, à l’aune duquel cet avantage sera comparé. En l’espèce, en vue de déterminer ce qui constitue une charge fiscale “normale”, au sens de ladite jurisprudence, il ne saurait être procédé à un examen comparatif des règles fiscales applicables dans l’ensemble des États membres, voire simplement de certains d’entre eux, sans dénaturer la vocation des dispositions relatives au contrôle des aides d’État. En effet, en l’absence d’harmonisation au niveau communautaire des dispositions fiscales des États membres, cet examen reviendrait à comparer des situations factuelles et juridiques différentes qui résultent de disparités législatives ou réglementaires entre les États membres. Les données fournies par la requérante dans le cadre du présent recours illustrent d’ailleurs la disparité qui existe entre les États membres, notamment quant à l’assiette et aux taux d’imposition des biens d’investissement », décision de la Commission C2/09, MoRaKG, Conditions générales régissant les investissements en capitaux (JO C 60 du 14.3.2009, p. 9), no 25.
English: For example, both Belgium and the UK apply a tax rate of 15 per cent of GGR to online gambling, whereas other Member States apply even lower rates (for example, Estonia 5 per cent of GGR, Latvia 10 per cent of GGR, Finland 8,25 per cent of GGR). Only Slovakia has set its a higher tax rate of 27 per cent of GGR.
Hungarian: Mind Belgium, mind az Egyesült Királyság például a bruttó szerencsejáték-bevételek 15 százalékának megfelelő adókulcsot alkalmaz az online szerencsejátékok esetében, míg más tagállamok ennél is alacsonyabb adókulcsot vezettek be (például Észtországban a bruttó szerencsejáték-bevételek 5 százaléka, Lettországban a bruttó szerencsejáték-bevételek 10 százaléka, Finnországban a bruttó szerencsejáték-bevételek 8,25 százaléka.) Csupán Szlovákia állapított meg magasabb, a bruttó szerencsejáték-bevételek 27 százalékának megfelelő adókulcsot.
English: The Commission requested further information by letters dated 11 August 2010 and 22 September 2010. The Danish authorities provided the requested information by letter dated 20 October 2010.
Italian: Con lettere dell’11 agosto 2010 e del 22 settembre 2010, la Commissione richiedeva ulteriori informazioni, trasmesse dalle autorità danesi in data 20 ottobre 2010.
English: Both complaints were forwarded to the Danish authorities on 23 September 2010 for their comments. The Danish authorities submitted their comments in their letter of 20 October 2010.
Italian: Entrambe le denunce sono state trasmesse alle autorità danesi il 23 settembre 2010 affinché formulassero al riguardo, le proprie osservazioni che le autorità danesi hanno trasmesso con lettera datata 20 ottobre 2010.
English: In particular, the Commission considered that the measure could be regarded as selective in the light of case law. It recalled that any assessment of the selectivity of a tax measure should involve examining whether a given measure favours certain undertakings in comparison with other undertakings whose legal and factual situation is comparable in the light of the objective pursued by the scheme in question [10].
Italian: In particolare, la Commissione ha ritenuto che, alla luce della giurisprudenza, la misura potesse considerarsi selettiva, e ha ricordato che qualsivoglia valutazione della selettività di una misura fiscale dovrebbe esaminare se una data misura favorisca talune imprese rispetto ad altre imprese che si trovino in una situazione fattuale e giuridica analoga tenuto conto dell’obiettivo perseguito da detto regime [10].
English: Besides the fact that the platforms and suppliers are not the same, it was argued that there are major differences between these electronic games since the physical presence of gamblers is required in order to play them in land-based casinos. Physical presence entails various costs (e.g. for transportation, entrance fees, cloakroom fees, food or drink) which are not incurred in online gambling.
Italian: A parte il fatto che le piattaforme e i fornitori non sono gli stessi, vi sono importanti differenze fra questi giochi elettronici, in quanto perché si possa giocare nei casinò tradizionali è necessaria la presenza fisica dei giocatori, la quale implica costi di varia natura (ad esempio, per il trasporto, il biglietto d’ingresso, il costo del guardaroba, dei pasti o delle bevande) che non vengono sostenuti giocando con un casinò on line.