FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ied/library?l=/ied_art_13_forum/opinions_article
Spanish: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ied/library?l=/ied_art_13_forum/opinions_article.
Dutch: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ied/library?l=/ied_art_13_forum/opinions_article.
Finnish: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ied/library?l=/ied_art_13_forum/opinions_article.
Slovak: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ied/library?l=/ied_art_13_forum/opinions_article.
Romanian: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ied/library?l=/ied_art_13_forum/opinions_article.
English: A best available techniques (BAT) reference document (BREF), resulting from this exchange of information, is defined in Article 3(11) of Directive 2010/75/EU. It is a document drawn up for defined activities describing, in particular, applied techniques, present emission and consumption levels, techniques considered for the determination of BAT as well as BAT conclusions and any emerging techniques, giving special consideration to the criteria listed in Annex III to Directive 2010/75/EU.
Spanish: En el artículo 3, punto 11, de la Directiva 2010/75/UE se define lo que se entiende por el documento de referencia (BREF) sobre las mejores técnicas disponibles (MTD) resultante de ese intercambio de información: documento elaborado para determinadas actividades, en el que se describen, en particular, las técnicas aplicadas, las emisiones actuales y los niveles de consumo, las técnicas que se tienen en cuenta para determinar las MTD, así como las conclusiones sobre las MTD y las técnicas emergentes, tomando especialmente en consideración los criterios que se enumeran en el anexo III de esa Directiva.
English: The objective of a BREF review is to identify evolutions in BAT. This is achieved primarily by examining the parts of the BREF laying down the conclusions on BAT and by revising or updating those conclusions where new information is available that allows for doing so.
Spanish: La finalidad de la revisión de un BREF es determinar la evolución de las MTD, principalmente analizando las partes del BREF en las que se establecen las conclusiones sobre las MTD y revisando o actualizando esas conclusiones cuando haya nueva información que permita hacerlo.
Italian: L’obiettivo del riesame di un BREF è individuare le evoluzioni delle BAT, principalmente esaminando le parti del BREF che riportano le conclusioni sulle BAT e riesaminando o aggiornando tali conclusioni qualora siano disponibili nuove informazioni che consentano di farlo.
English: The EIPPCB analyses all the comments and prepares for a final TWG meeting. The EIPPCB drafts a background paper including at least an assessment of the major comments received (see Section 4.6.6), and provides at least the latest version of the chapters of the BREF entitled ‘Current emission and consumption levels’ (see Section 2.3.6), ‘Techniques to consider in the determination of BAT’ (see Section 2.3.7) and ‘Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions’ (see Section 2.3.8).
Spanish: El EIPPCB estudia todas las observaciones y se encarga de los preparativos de la reunión final del GTT.
English: As per Article 3(12) of Directive 2010/75/EU, BAT conclusions should also address monitoring associated with BAT (frequency and methods of monitoring). This can be done either by including separate conclusions on monitoring or as part of other conclusions such as where an environmental performance range is provided.
Spanish: Según el artículo 3, punto 12, de la Directiva 2010/75/UE, las conclusiones sobre las MTD pueden referirse también a las monitorizaciones asociadas a las MTD (frecuencia y métodos de control), por ejemplo incluyendo conclusiones especiales a este respecto o refiriéndose a este asunto en otras conclusiones en las que se ofrezca un rango de valores de comportamiento ambiental.
English: As concentrations (mass of pollutant released per volume). This is generally the most common way of expressing emission levels, but reference conditions and averaging periods are crucial for their comparability.
Spanish: Como concentraciones (masa de contaminante emitido por volumen); esta suele ser la forma más común de expresar niveles de emisión, pero las condiciones y los períodos de referencia son fundamentales para poder establecer comparaciones.
English: Environmental performance levels other than emission levels can be associated with certain BAT. Examples include consumption of material, water or energy, the generation of waste, abatement efficiency on pollutants and duration of visible emissions.
Spanish: A algunas MTD se les puede asociar niveles de comportamiento ambiental distintos de los niveles de emisión, por ejemplo consumo de materiales, agua o energía, generación de residuos, eficiencia en materia de reducción de contaminantes o duración de emisiones visibles.
English: This information exchange process is often referred to as the ‘Sevilla process’ due to the fact that it is coordinated by the EIPPCB based in Seville, Spain. The roles of the main participants involved in this process are described in Sections 4.2 to 4.5.
Spanish: Al proceso de intercambio de información se le ha dado en llamar «proceso de Sevilla», ya que su coordinación corre a cargo del EIPPCB, cuya sede se encuentra en esa ciudad española.
English: The Forum is also the place where general issues relating to the exchange of information are discussed. Through the Forum, stakeholders can express their opinions on the information exchange process.
Spanish: En el Foro, además, se debaten cuestiones generales en relación con el intercambio de información y las partes interesadas pueden expresar sus opiniones sobre ese proceso.
English: a valid rationale supporting the split view is provided by the TWG member(s) concerned. The EIPPCB will consider a rationale to be valid if it is supported by appropriate technical, cross-media or economic data or information relevant to the definition of BAT.
Spanish: el miembro o miembros del GTT que expresan una opinión divergente proporcionan una justificación válida; el EIPPCB considerará que una justificación es válida si está respaldada por datos válidos de carácter técnico o económico o relativos a los efectos sobre otros medios pertinentes en relación con la definición de MTD.
English: An indication of the techniques used (including both the technology used and the way in which the installations are designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned) to reduce the consumption of water. If efforts made to reduce water consumption lead to more concentrated effluents, this will be indicated as well as measures taken to minimise the environmental impact of more concentrated effluents.
Spanish: indicación de las técnicas aplicadas (tanto la tecnología utilizada como la forma en que las instalaciones están diseñadas, construidas, mantenidas, explotadas y paralizadas) para reducir el consumo de agua; si las medidas adoptadas para reducir el consumo de agua provocan efluentes más concentrados, debe indicarse este particular, así como las medidas adoptadas para reducir al mínimo el impacto ambiental de esa mayor concentración.
Latvian: norāde par tehnisko paņēmienu (ietverot gan izmantoto tehnoloģiju, gan risinājumus, kas attiecas uz iekārtas uzbūvi, uzstādīšanu, apkopi, ekspluatāciju un ekspluatācijas pārtraukšanu), ko izmanto, lai samazinātu ūdens patēriņu; ja ūdens patēriņa samazināšanas rezultātā paaugstinās izplūdes koncentrācija, tas ir jānorāda, kā arī jānorāda pasākumi, kas veikti, lai samazinātu augstākas izplūdes koncentrācijas ietekmi uz vidi.
English: The type of monitoring method used (e.g. direct measurement, indirect measurement, mass/heat balances, emission factors) and an indication of the EN/ISO (or other) monitoring standard(s) used including the sampling method and sample pre-treatment. If available, the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) will be given for the parameter monitored. In cases where the monitoring standard used is not an EN/ISO standard, a description of the standard will be provided.
Spanish: tipo de método de control utilizado (por ejemplo, mediciones directas, mediciones indirectas, balance térmico, balance de masas, factores de emisión, etc.) y norma o normas de control EN/ISO u otras utilizadas, incluidos el método de muestreo y el pretratamiento de las muestras; si se dispone de tal información, límite de detección y límite de cuantificación del parámetro controlado; si el método de control utilizado no se ajusta a una norma EN/ISO, descripción de la norma aplicada;
English: Therefore, by definition, a BREF is a descriptive document and it does not prescribe the use of any technique or specific technology, nor does it interpret Directive 2010/75/EU. Best available techniques (BAT) are defined in Article 3(10) of Directive 2010/75/EU as the most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing the basis for emission limit values and other permit conditions designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole:
Finnish: Parhaalla käytettävissä olevalla tekniikalla (best available techniques, BAT) tarkoitetaan direktiivin 2010/75/EU 3 artiklan 10 kohtaan sisältyvän määritelmän mukaan tietyn toiminnan ja siinä käytettävien menetelmien tehokkainta ja edistyneintä astetta, joka osoittaa sellaiset tekniset ja käytännölliset ominaisuudet, jotka soveltuvat käytännön pohjaksi raja-arvoille ja muille lupaehdoille, joilla on tarkoitus estää, tai milloin se ei ole mahdollista, vähentää päästöjä ja vaikutuksia koko ympäristöön.
Latvian: Labākie pieejamie tehniskie paņēmieni (LPTP) ir definēti Direktīvas 2010/75/ES 3. panta 10. punktā kā efektīvākais un pilnīgākais darbību un ekspluatācijas metožu izstrādes posms, kurā tiek parādīta konkrēto tehnisko paņēmienu faktiskā piemērotība tam, lai noteiktu pamatus emisiju robežvērtībām un citus atļaujas nosacījumus, kas paredzēti, lai novērstu un – gadījumos, kad novēršana ir neiespējama – samazinātu emisijas un ietekmi uz vidi kopumā.
English: ways to deal with potentially confidential business information and sensitive information under competition law, conflicts of interests and related matters.
Portuguese: Formas de lidar com informações comerciais potencialmente confidenciais e com informações sensíveis ao abrigo da legislação em matéria de concorrência, conflitos de interesses e matérias afins.
Swedish: Sätt att handskas med potentiellt konfidentiell företagsinformation och känslig information enligt konkurrensrätten, intressekonflikter och frågor som rör detta.
Finnish: Niitä ovat erityisesti:
Slovak: Spôsoby zaobchádzania s potenciálne dôvernými obchodnými informáciami a citlivými informáciami podľa právnych predpisov o hospodárskej súťaži, s konfliktami záujmov a súvisiacimi záležitosťami.
Maltese: Modi kif għandha tiġi ttrattata l-informazzjoni kummerċjali kunfidenzjali u l-informazzjoni sensittiva skont il-liġi tal-kompetizzjoni, il-kunflitti ta’ interess u kwistjonijiet relatati.
English: (see Section 5.3);
Portuguese: (ver secção 5.3).
Swedish: (se avsnitt 5.3).
Finnish: i. Tavat, joilla käsitellään mahdollisia liikesalaisuuksia ja kilpailulainsäädännön perusteella arkaluonteisia tietoja, eturistiriitoja ja muita asiaan liittyviä seikkoja (ks. 5.3 kohta).
Slovak: (pozri oddiel 5.3).
Hungarian: i. Az esetlegesen bizalmas üzleti információk és a versenyjog hatálya alá tartozó kényes információk, továbbá az érdekellentétek és a kapcsolódó kérdések kezelésének módjai (lásd az 5.3. szakaszt).
Maltese: (ara t-Taqsima 5.3);
English: The main steps for the drawing up and reviewing of BREFs and their timescales are described in more detail in Table 1. These steps take into account the aim set out in recital 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU that BREFs should be updated no later than eight years after the publication of the previous version.
French: Les délais susmentionnés sont représentatifs en ce qui concerne un BREF «vertical» (voir la section 1.1.2).
Portuguese: A calendarização indicada deve ser considerada representativa de um documento de referência MTD «vertical» típico (ver secção 1.1.2).
English: The timescales indicated above should be taken as representative of a typical ‘vertical’ BREF (see Section 1.1.2). The exact steps and timing of the work for each BREF will depend on a number of factors, including the scope of the BREF (and the possible extension of the scope in the case of BREF reviews), the number and complexity of topics that need to be addressed, the resources of the EIPPCB (given its central role in the information exchange process) and, above all, the level of active and effective participation of the TWG.
French: Les étapes et le calendrier précis des travaux de chaque BREF dépendront de plusieurs facteurs, dont le champ d’application du BREF (et l’éventuel élargissement du champ d’application dans le cas des révisions de BREF), le nombre et la complexité des thèmes à traiter, les ressources du Bureau européen IPPC (compte tenu du rôle central qu’il joue dans le processus d’échange d’informations) et, surtout, le niveau de participation active et effective du GTT.
Portuguese: Os passos e a calendarização exatos do trabalho para cada documento de referência MTD dependem de um conjunto de fatores, como o âmbito do documento (e o possível alargamento do âmbito no caso de revisões), o número e complexidade de tópicos a abordar, os recursos do Gabinete Europeu para a Prevenção e Controlo Integrados da Poluição (face ao papel central que desempenha no processo de intercâmbio de informações) e, sobretudo, o nível de participação efetiva e ativa do grupo de trabalho técnico.
English: The quality of a BREF depends upon both the quality of the participants involved in the process (high level of technical expertise and involvement) and also the quality of the ‘Sevilla process’ itself. To guarantee this quality, Member States, industries concerned, non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection and the Commission are each expected to have in place a quality system that includes:
French: La qualité d’un BREF dépend à la fois de la qualité des participants au processus (haut niveau d’expertise technique et de participation) et de la qualité du «processus de Séville» en tant que tel. Pour garantir cette qualité, les États membres, les secteurs industriels concernés, les organisations non gouvernementales œuvrant pour la protection de l’environnement et la Commission sont censés avoir mis en place un système de qualité qui inclut:
English: Best available techniques (BAT) are defined in Article 3(10) of Directive 2010/75/EU as the most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing the basis for emission limit values and other permit conditions designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole: (a) ‘techniques’ includes both the technology used and the way in which the installation is designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned; (b) ‘available techniques’ means those developed on a scale which allows implementation in the relevant industrial sector, under economically and technically viable conditions, taking into consideration the costs and advantages, whether or not the techniques are used or produced inside the Member State in question, as long as they are reasonably accessible to the operator; (c) ‘best’ means most effective in achieving a high general level of protection of the environment as a whole.
Hungarian: A 2010/75/EU irányelv 3. cikkének (12) bekezdése szerint a „BAT-következtetések” a BREF azon részeit képezik, amelyek következtetéseket vonnak le az elérhető legjobb technikákra vonatkozóan, továbbá tartalmazzák azok leírását, az alkalmazhatóságuk értékelésével kapcsolatos információkat, az elérhető legjobb technikákhoz kapcsolódó kibocsátási szinteket, ellenőrzéseket és fogyasztási szinteket, valamint adott esetben az alkalmazandó helyreállítási intézkedéseket.
Lithuanian: Be to, Direktyvos 2010/75/ES 3 straipsnio 12 dalyje GPGB išvados apibūdinamos kaip GPGBID dalys, kuriose pateiktos išvados dėl geriausių prieinamų gamybos būdų, jie aprašomi, pateikiama informacija dėl jų pritaikymo galimybių, su geriausiais prieinamais gamybos būdais siejamo išmetamų teršalų lygio, susijusios stebėsenos, susijusių suvartojimo lygių ir prireikus atitinkamos eksploatavimo vietos atkūrimo priemonių.
English: BREFs should provide information to the competent authorities of Member States, industrial operators, the Commission and the public at large on what BAT and emerging techniques are for the activities covered by Directive 2010/75/EU. The process of determining BAT and emerging techniques should be transparent and objective, based on sound technical and economic information.
Hungarian: Elsődleges céljának megvalósítása és egyszerű kezelhetőségének biztosítása érdekében a BREF tartalmának a 2010/75/EU irányelv végrehajtásával összefüggésben az elérhető legjobb technikák és a 3. fejezetben [1] meghatározott kapcsolódó környezetvédelmi teljesítményszintek, valamint új keletű technikák meghatározása szempontjából lényeges információkra kell szorítkoznia.
English: A BREF should also serve as a driver towards improved environmental performance across the Union. To serve its main aim and ensure its user-friendliness, the content of the BREF should be limited to the relevant information for enabling the determination of BAT and the associated environmental performance levels as set out in Chapter 3 [1] and emerging techniques in the context of implementing Directive 2010/75/EU.
Hungarian: A BREF nem a környezetszennyezés megakadályozására és szabályozására szolgáló technikákról szóló kézikönyv.
English: A BREF is not meant to be a textbook on techniques to prevent and control pollution. Extensive literature exists on the subject to which the BREF can refer where needed.
Hungarian: E témakör tekintélyes mennyiségű szakirodalommal rendelkezik, amelyet a BREF szükség esetén felhasználhat.
English: The Forum established under Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU is an expert group convened and chaired by the Commission and consists of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection. The appointment of members to the Forum is carried out in accordance with Commission Decision 2011/C 146/03 of 16 May 2011 establishing the Forum [10], which also sets out the task of the Forum.The Forum's role, as described in recital 14 and in Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU, is to ensure an effective, active and transparent exchange of information resulting in high quality BREFs by discussing and giving its opinion on the practical arrangements for the exchange of information.
Hungarian: A 2010/75/EU irányelv 13. cikke szerint létrehozott fórum a Bizottság által összehívott és elnökletével ülésező szakértői csoport, amely a tagállamok, az érintett iparágak és a környezetvédelemmel foglalkozó nem kormányzati szervezetek képviselőiből áll. A fórum tagjait a fórumot létrehozó és annak feladatait meghatározó, 2011. május 16-i 2011/C 146/03. bizottsági határozat [10] szerint kell kijelölni.A fórum szerepe a 2010/75/EU irányelv (14) preambulumbekezdésének és 13. cikkének megfelelően a hatékony, aktív és átlátható információcsere biztosítása az információcsere gyakorlati vonatkozásainak megvitatásával és véleményezésével, amelynek köszönhetően kiváló minőségű BREF-ek születnek.
English: The kick-off meeting will also provide the opportunity to inform TWG members on issues that need to be treated consistently among BREFs, in particular: (i) ways to deal with potentially confidential business information and sensitive information under competition law, conflicts of interests and related matters.
Hungarian: A nyitóülésen lehetőség nyílik a szakmai munkacsoport tagjainak tájékoztatására azokról a kérdésekről, amelyeket következetesen kell kezelni mindegyik BREF-ben, különös tekintettel a következőkre:
English: Information should be included in ‘horizontal’ BREFs where this supplements the information contained in ‘vertical’ BREFs on aspects that cut across several industrial sectors. This should not result in conflicting conclusions between ‘vertical’ and ‘horizontal’ BREFs.
Italian: Nei BREF «orizzontali» devono essere incluse informazioni che integrino le informazioni contenute nei BREF «verticali» su aspetti che riguardano vari settori industriali, senza che ciò dia adito a conclusioni contrastanti tra BREF «verticali» e «orizzontali».
English: The review of a BREF will mainly focus on chapters of the BREF entitled ‘Techniques to consider in the determination of BAT’, ‘Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions’ and ‘Emerging techniques’ and, to a lesser extent, on chapters of the BREF entitled ‘Applied processes and techniques’ (in case of important changes in this chapter) and ‘Current emission and consumption levels’. The review of the other chapters of the BREF should be given a lower priority.
Italian: Il riesame di un BREF si concentra principalmente sui capitoli intitolati «Tecniche da considerare per la determinazione delle BAT», «Conclusioni sulle migliori tecniche disponibili (BAT)» e «Tecniche emergenti» e, in minor misura, sui capitoli intitolati «Processi e tecniche applicati» (in caso di importanti modifiche di questo capitolo) e «Livelli attuali di emissione e di consumo» Al riesame di altri capitoli del BREF occorre attribuire una priorità minore.
Maltese: Ir-reviżjoni ta’ BREF għandha tiffoka l-aktar fuq il-Kapitli tal-BREF intitolati “Tekniki li għandhom Jitqiesu fid-Determinazzjoni tal-BAT”, “Konklużjonijiet tal-Aqwa Tekniki Disponibbli (NAT)’ u “Tekniki Emerġenti” u, sa ċertu punt tiffoka inqas, fuq il-Kapitli tal-BREF intitolati “Proċessi u tekniki applikati” (fil-każ ta’ bidliet importanti f’dan il-Kapitlu) u “Livelli attwali ta’ emissjonijiet u konsum”. Ir-reviżjoni tal-Kapitli l-oħra tal-BREF għandha tingħata inqas prijorità.
English: Table 1 Main steps for the drawing up and reviewing of a BREF
Italian: La durata di cui sopra deve essere considerata rappresentativa di un tipico BREF «verticale» (cfr. sezione 1.1.2).
English: 1 TWG (re)activation and call for wishes 2 2
Italian: Dopo aver completato un BREF, l’EIPPCB gestisce il forum BATIS per il BREF in questione (cfr. sezione 4.7.1), in particolare per quanto riguarda le azioni da intraprendere per dare seguito alle raccomandazioni per i futuri lavori formulate nel BREF (cfr. sezione 2.3.10) e tenuto conto del futuro riesame del BREF.
English: The TWG collects and submits the information promised or identified in the conclusions of the kick-off meeting. Information readily available is submitted to the EIPPCB without delay so that drafting can start as soon as possible after the kick-off meeting. During this period, the EIPPCB can: participate in site visits, which might be agreed at or after the kick-off meeting (see Section 4.6.2.2), research information, start drafting using the available information submitted early.
Italian: L’EIPPCB (ri)attiva il gruppo di lavoro tecnico (chiedendo la conferma dei membri e dei dati di contatto).
English: The information submitted by members of the TWG and collected by the EIPPCB is shared with the TWG members in ‘real time’ via BATIS according to Sections 4.7.1 and 5.3. The TWG members can comment on the submitted information and share the comments through BATIS.
Italian: Nel caso del riesame di un BREF, l’EIPPCB chiede ai membri del gruppo di lavoro tecnico di esprimere i loro auspici per quanto riguarda le informazioni che dovrebbero essere considerate durante il processo di riesame o le modifiche/correzioni che dovrebbero essere introdotte nel testo esistente (cfr. sezione 4.6.1).