FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: In the present specifications, the digital identifier used in this field SHALL be the relevant X.509v3 Certificate being a representation of the public key(s) that the CSP uses for providing the service whose type is specified by the ‘Service type identifier’ (clause 5.5.1) (i.e. the key used by a RootCA/QC, the key used for signing certificates [19], or alternatively issuing Time Stamp Tokens, or signing CRLs, or signing OCSP responses). This related X.509v3 Certificate SHALL be used as the minimum required digital identifier (being the representation of the public key(s) the CSP uses for providing the listed service). Additional identifiers MAY be used as follows but they all MUST refer to the same identity (i.e. the related X.509v3 certificate): (a) The distinguished name (DN) of the certificate which can be used to verify electronic signatures of the CSP service specified in ‘Service type identifier’ (clause 5.5.1);
Danish: I nærværende forskrifter SKAL den anvendte digitale identifikator være det relevante X.509v3-certifikat, som gengiver den/de offentlige nøgle(r), som CSP'en anvender til at levere den tjeneste, hvis type er angivet af »Service type identifier« (punkt 5.5.1) (dvs. den nøgle, der anvendes af RootCA/QC, den nøgle, der anvendes til underskrivelse af certifikater [19], eller alternativt til udstedelse af tidsstemplingstokens, underskrivelse af CRL ' er eller underskrivelse af OCSP-svar). Dette relaterede X.509v3-certifikat SKAL anvendes som mindste påkrævede digitale identifikator (som er gengivelsen af de offentlige nøgler, som CSP ' en bruger til levering af den angivne tjeneste). Der KAN anvendes yderligere følgende identifikatorer, men de SKAL alle henvise til samme identitet (dvs. det relaterede X.509v3-certifikat): a) certifikatets »distinguished name« (DN), som kan anvendes til at verificere elektroniske signaturer fra den CSP-tjeneste, der er angivet i »Service type identifier« (punkt 5.5.1)
English: Note(2): When additional ‘qualification’ information needs to be provided with regard to the identified service entry, then, when appropriate, the Scheme Operator SHALL consider the use of the ‘additionalServiceInformation’ extension (clause 5.8.2) of the ‘Service information extension’ field (clause 5.5.9) according to the purpose of providing such additional ‘qualification’ information. Additionally, the Scheme operator can optionally use clause 5.5.6 (Scheme service definition URI).
Danish: Bemærkning 2: Når det er nødvendigt at levere yderligere »kvalifikationsoplysninger« om den angivne tjenesteydelsesindgang, SKAL operatøren af ordningen, hvis det er relevant, overveje anvendelse af udvidelsen »additionalServiceInformation« (punkt 5.8.2) i feltet »Service information extension« (punkt 5.5.9) afhængigt af formålet med at angive sådanne yderligere »kvalifikationsoplysninger«. Desuden kan operatøren vælge at anvende punkt 5.5.6 (»Scheme service definition URI«).
English: Supervision of Service in Cessation The service identified in ‘Service digital identity’ (clause 5.5.3) provided by the CSP identified in ‘TSP name’ (clause 5.4.1) is currently in a cessation phase but still supervised until supervision is ceased or revoked. In the event a different legal person than the one identified in ‘TSP name’ has taken over the responsibility of ensuring this cessation phase, the identification of this new or fallback legal person (fallback CSP) shall be provided in clause 5.5.6 of the service entry.
Danish: Overvågning af tjenesten under ophør Den tjeneste, der er angivet i »Service digital identity« (punkt 5.5.3), og som leveres af den CSP, der er angivet i »TSP name« (punkt 5.4.1), er for tiden under afvikling, men overvåges stadig, indtil overvågningen ophører eller tilbagekaldes. I tilfælde af, at en anden juridisk person end den i »TSP name« angivne har overtaget ansvaret med at gennemføre denne ophørsfase, skal denne nye »fallback«-persons (fallback CSP) identitet angives i punkt 5.5.6 i tjenesteydelsesindgangen.
English: Note(1): The status value ‘Supervision Revoked’ can be a definitive status, even if the CSP then completely ceases its activity; there is no need to migrate to either ‘Supervision of Service in Cessation’ or to ‘Supervision Ceased’ status in this case. Actually, the only way to change the ‘Supervision Revoked’ status is to recover from non-compliance to compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC according to the appropriate supervision system in force in the Member State owing the TL, and regaining ‘Under Supervision’ status.
Danish: Bemærkning 1: Statusværdien »Supervision Revoked« kan være en definitiv status, selv om CSP'en som følge heraf fuldstændigt indstiller sin aktivitet; i dette tilfælde er det ikke nødvendigt at overgå til statussen »overvågning af tjenesten under ophør« eller »overvågning ophørt«. Faktisk er den eneste måde at ændre statussen »overvågning tilbagekaldt« på, at vende den manglende overholdelse til overholdelse af bestemmelserne i direktiv 1999/93/EF i overensstemmelse med det relevante gældende overvågningssystem i den medlemsstat, der ejer TL, og således genvinde status som »under overvågning«. Statussen »overvågning af tjenesten under ophør« eller »overvågning ophørt« forekommer kun, når en CSP direkte indstiller en tjeneste under overvågning, ikke når overvågningen er blevet tilbagekaldt.
English: Note(2): When used in the context of a CSP issuing QCs that is established in the ‘Scheme territory’ (clause 5.3.10), the following two statuses ‘Accreditation Revoked’ and ‘Accreditation Ceased’ MUST be considered as ‘transit statuses’ and MUST not be used as value for ‘Service current status’ as, in case they are used, they MUST be immediately followed in the ‘Service approval history information’ or in the ‘Service current status’ by an ‘Under supervision’ status, potentially followed by any other supervision status defined here above and as illustrated in Figure 1. When used in the context of a CSP not issuing QCs when there is only an associated ‘voluntary accreditation’ scheme with no associated supervision scheme or in the context of a CSP issuing QCs where the CSP is not established in the ‘Scheme territory’ (clause 5.3.10) (e.g. in a third country), those ‘Accreditation Revoked’ and ‘Accreditation Ceased’ statuses MAY be used as a value for ‘Service current status’:
Danish: Bemærkning 2: Når statusserne »akkreditering tilbagekaldt« og »akkreditering ophørt« anvendes i forbindelse med en CSP, som udsteder QC'er, og som er etableret i »Scheme territory« (klausul 5.3.10), SKAL de betragtes som »transitstatusser« og MÅ ikke anvendes som værdi for »aktuel status for tjenesten«, fordi de i »Service approval history information« eller i »Service current status«, såfremt de anvendes, SKAL følges umiddelbart af status »under overvågning«, eventuelt fulgt af en anden overvågningsstatus, som er defineret ovenfor og er illustreret i figur 1. Når statusserne »akkreditering tilbagekaldt« og »akkreditering ophørt« anvendes i forbindelse med en CSP, der ikke udsteder QC'er, når der kun er en tilknyttet »frivillig akkrediteringsordning« uden tilhørende overvågningsordning eller i forbindelse med en CSP, der udsteder QC'er, hvor CSP'en ikke er etableret i »Scheme territory« (punkt 5.3.10) (f.eks. i et tredjeland), KAN de anvendes som værdi for »Service current status«:
English: Note(4): Additional status-related ‘qualification’ information defined at the level of national supervision/accreditation systems for CSPs not issuing QCs MAY be provided at the service level when applicable and required (e.g. to distinguish between several quality/security levels). Scheme Operators SHALL use the ‘additionalServiceInformation’ extension (clause 5.8.2) of the ‘Service information extension’ field (clause 5.5.9) according to the purpose of providing such additional ‘qualification’ information. Additionally, the Scheme operator can optionally use clause 5.5.6 (Scheme service definition URI).
Danish: Bemærkning 4: Yderligere statusrelaterede »kvalifikationsoplysninger« defineret i forbindelse med nationale overvågnings/akkrediteringssystemer for CSP'ere, der ikke udsteder QC'er, KAN, i det omfang det er relevant og påkrævet, angives på tjenesteniveau (f.eks. for at skelne mellem flere kvalitets/sikkerhedsniveauer). Operatører SKAL anvende udvidelsen »additionalServiceInformation« (punkt 5.8.2) i feltet »Service information extension« (punkt 5.5.9) afhængigt af formålet med at angive sådanne yderligere »kvalifikationsoplysninger«. Desuden kan operatøren vælge at anvende punkt 5.5.6 (»URI for definition af tjenesteordning«).
English: This field is OPTIONAL, and if present SHALL specify the URI(s) where relying parties can obtain service-specific information provided by the TSP as a sequence of multilingual pointers (with EN as the mandatory language and potentially with one or more national languages). The referenced URI(s) MUST provide a path to information describing the service as specified by the TSP.
Danish: Dette felt er VALGFRIT og SKAL i givet fald angive URI(»er«), hvor afhængige parter kan få tjenestespecifikke oplysninger, som leveres af TSP'en som en sekvens af flersprogede pointers (med EN som obligatorisk sprog og potentielt ét eller flere nationalsprog). Den/de URI(»er«), der henvises til, SKAL indeholde en sti til oplysninger, der beskriver tjenesten som specificeret af TSP'en.
English: The HR form MAY be signed electronically.
French: La forme HR PEUT être signée électroniquement.
German: Die menschenlesbare Form KANN elektronisch signiert werden.
Spanish: La forma HR PODRÁ estar firmada electrónicamente.
Italian: la forma HR PUÒ essere firmata elettronicamente.
Portuguese: O formulário HR PODE ser assinado electronicamente.
Dutch: De menselijk leesbare versie KAN elektronisch worden ondertekend.
Danish: HR-udgaven KAN være elektronisk underskrevet.
Swedish: Den läsbara versionen FÅR vara elektroniskt signerad.
Finnish: HR-muoto SAA olla sähköisesti allekirjoitettu.
Greek: Η μορφή HR ΔΥΝΑΤΑΙ ΝΑ φέρει ηλεκτρονική υπογραφή.
Slovak: Forma HR MÔŽE byť elektronicky podpísaná.
Polish: postać czytelna dla człowieka MOŻE być podpisywana za pomocą podpisu elektronicznego.
Hungarian: Az emberi szemmel olvasható formátumot elektronikus úton is alá LEHET írni.
Slovenian: Berljivo obliko je MOGOČE podpisati elektronsko.
Estonian: HR vormi VÕIB allkirjastada elektrooniliselt.
Latvian: HR formu VAR parakstīt elektroniski.
Lithuanian: ŽS forma GALI būti pasirašyta elektroniniu būdu.
English: When signed it MUST be signed by the Scheme Operator according to the same signature specifications as for the TSL implementation of the Trusted List.
French: Si elle est signée, elle DOIT l’être par l’exploitant du système selon les mêmes spécifications applicables aux signatures que pour l’implémentation TSL de la liste de confiance.
German: In diesem Fall MUSS sie vom „Scheme operator“ anhand derselben Signaturspezifikationen signiert werden, wie sie für die TSL-Implementierung der vertrauenswürdigen Liste gelten.
Spanish: En tal caso, DEBERÁ estarlo por el operador del régimen con arreglo a las mismas especificaciones en cuanto a la firma que la implementación TSL de la lista de confianza.
Italian: In tal caso DEVE essere firmata dal gestore del sistema secondo le stesse specifiche relative alla firma valide per l’applicazione TSL dell’elenco di fiducia.
Portuguese: Quando assinado, o formulário HR DEVE ser assinado pelo Operador do Sistema de acordo com as especificações de assinatura idênticas às da aplicação TSL da Lista Aprovada.
Dutch: Indien deze wordt ondertekend, MOET de uitvoerder van de regeling dit doen volgens dezelfde handtekeningspecificaties als voor de SLV-implementatie van de vertrouwenslijst.
Danish: I så tilfælde SKAL den være underskrevet af operatøren for ordningen i overensstemmelse med signaturforskrifter som for TSL-implementeringen af positivlisten.
Swedish: Om den signeras MÅSTE detta göras av systemoperatören enligt samma signeringsspecifikationer som för TSL-tillämpningen av den tillförlitliga förteckningen.
Finnish: Jos se on allekirjoitettu, sen allekirjoittajan PITÄÄ olla järjestelmäoperaattori ja allekirjoittajan on noudatettava samoja allekirjoituseritelmiä kuin luotettavan luettelon TSL-toteutuksessa noudatetaan.
Greek: Όταν υπογράφεται, ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ υπογράφεται από τον υπεύθυνο σχήματος, σύμφωνα με τις ίδιες προδιαγραφές υπογραφής που ισχύουν και για την εφαρμογή TSL του καταλόγου εμπίστευσης.
Slovak: Ak je podpísaná, MUSÍ byť podpísaná prevádzkovateľom schémy podľa tých istých špecifikácií podpisu, ako pri TSL implementácii zoznamu dôveryhodných poskytovateľov.
Polish: Jeżeli jest podpisywana, MUSI zostać podpisana przez operatora systemu zgodnie z taką samą specyfikacją podpisu, jak w przypadku wdrożenia TSL zaufanej listy.
Hungarian: Aláírása esetén KÖTELEZŐ, hogy az aláíró a rendszerüzemeltető legyen, és az aláírás módja megegyezik a megbízható szolgáltatók tagállami listáinak TSL implementációjára vonatkozó aláírási specifikációval.
Slovenian: Ko je podpisana, jo MORA podpisati upravljavec sheme v skladu z enakimi specifikacijami za podpis, kot veljajo za izvajanje TSL zanesljivega seznama.
Estonian: Allkirjastamise korral PEAB süsteemioperaator vormi allkirjastama vastavalt samadele allkirjanõuetele, mis kehtivad usaldusnimekirja TSL rakenduse suhtes.
Latvian: Tā jāparaksta shēmas operatoram saskaņā ar tām pašām paraksta specifikācijām, ko piemēro uzticamā saraksta TSL implementācijai.
Lithuanian: Jei sąrašas pasirašomas, jį PRIVALO pasirašyti schemos operatorius, laikydamasis tų pačių parašo specifikacijų, kokios taikomos PUPSS forma rengiamam patikimam sąrašui.
English: Those sets of information shall be provided at TL level through the use of the present ‘Scheme information URI’ (clause 5.3.7 — information being provided by Member State), ‘Scheme type/community/rules’ (clause 5.3.9 — through the use of a text common to all Member States) and ‘TSL policy/legal notice’ (clause 5.3.11 — a text common to all Member States referring to Directive 1999/93/EC, together with the ability for each Member State to add Member State specific text/references). Additional information on national supervision/accreditation systems for CSPs not issuing QCs may be provided at service level when applicable and required (e.g. to distinguish between several quality/security levels) through the use of ‘Scheme service definition URI’ (clause 5.5.6).
Danish: Disse oplysningskategorier angives på TL-niveau ved anvendelse af nærværende »Scheme information URI« (punkt 5.3.7 — oplysninger, der leveres af medlemsstaten), »Scheme type/community/rules« (punkt 5.3.9 — gennem anvendelse af en fælles tekst for alle medlemsstater) og »TSL policy/legal notice« (punkt 5.3.11 — en fælles tekst for alle medlemsstater, der henviser til direktiv 1999/93/EF, samtidig med at hver medlemsstat har mulighed for at tilføje medlemsstatsspecifik tekst/henvisninger). Yderligere oplysninger om nationale overvågnings/akkrediteringssystemer for CSP ' er, der ikke udsteder QC ' er, kan afgives på tjensteniveau i det omfang det er relevant (f.eks. for at skelne mellem flere kvalitets/sikkerhedsniveauer) gennem »Scheme service definition URI« (punkt 5.5.6).
English: http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999-93-EC-TrustedList/schemerules/common
German: http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999-93-EC-TrustedList/schemerules/common Der deskriptive Text enthält:
Swedish: http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999–93-EC-TrustedList/schemerules/common
Latvian: http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999-93-EC-TrustedList/schemerules/common,
English: The Trusted List of a Member State must provide a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates to the public in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3,3, 3,2 and Art. 7.1(a)), information on the QC supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device. Additional information on other supervised/accredited services from CSPs not issuing QCs to the public (e.g. CSPs providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSPs issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) may be included in the Trusted List at national level on a voluntary basis.
Greek: Ο κατάλογος εμπίστευσης αποσκοπεί στα εξής:
English: The Trusted List aims at: listing and providing reliable information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers, who are supervised/accredited by the Member State responsible for establishing and maintaining the List for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC;
Greek: στην καταγραφή και στην παροχή αξιόπιστων πληροφοριών σχετικά με την κατάσταση εποπτείας/διαπίστευσης των υπηρεσιών πιστοποίησης από παρόχους υπηρεσιών πιστοποίησης οι οποίοι εποπτεύονται/διαπιστεύονται από το κράτος μέλος το οποίο είναι υπεύθυνο για την κατάρτιση και την τήρηση του καταλόγου, ως προς τη συμμόρφωση με τις σχετικές διατάξεις της οδηγίας 1999/93/ΕΚ,
English: Supervision is used in the meaning of Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3,3). The Directive requires Member States to establish an appropriate system allowing the supervision of CSPs which are established on their territory and issue qualified certificates to the public, ensuring the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in the Directive.
Greek: Όπως ορίζεται στο άρθρο 2 σημείο 13 της οδηγίας 1999/93/ΕΚ.
English: As defined in article 2(13) of Directive 1999/93/EC Trusted List TL
Greek: Ορίζει τον κατάλογο που υποδεικνύει την κατάσταση εποπτείας/διαπίστευσης των υπηρεσιών πιστοποίησης από παρόχους υπηρεσιών πιστοποίησης οι οποίοι εποπτεύονται/διαπιστεύονται από το σχετικό κράτος μέλος ως προς τη συμμόρφωση με τις σχετικές διατάξεις της οδηγίας 1999/93/ΕΚ.
English: Trust-service Status List TSL
Greek: TSL
English: QES
Portuguese: AEQ
Dutch: KEH
Greek: AdES
Lithuanian: KEP
English: AdES
Portuguese: AEA
Dutch: AEH
Greek: AdESQC
Hungarian: AdESQC
Lithuanian: SEP
English: AdESQC
Portuguese: AEACQ
Dutch: AEHKC
Greek: SSCD
Hungarian: SSCD
Lithuanian: SEPKS
English: Means an Electronic Signature that meets the requirements of an AdES and is supported by a QC as defined in Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC. Secure Signature Creation Device SSCD
Greek: Όπως ορίζεται στο άρθρο 2 σημείο 6 της οδηγίας 1999/93/ΕΚ
Hungarian: Az 1999/93/EK irányelv 2. cikkének (6) bekezdésében szereplő fogalommeghatározás szerint.
English: CHAPTER I DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COMMON TEMPLATE FOR THE ‘TRUSTED LIST OF SUPERVISED/ACCREDITED CERTIFICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS’
Greek: ΑΝΑΛΥΤΙΚΕΣ ΠΡΟΔΙΑΓΡΑΦΕΣ ΕΝΟΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΥ ΣΧΕΔΙΟΤΥΠΟΥ ΓΙΑ ΤΟΝ «ΚΑΤΑΛΟΓΟ ΕΜΠΙΣΤΕΥΣΗΣ ΕΠΟΠΤΕ ΥΟΜΕΝΩΝ/ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΕΥΜΕΝΩΝ ΠΑΡΟΧΩΝ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΩΝ ΠΙΣΤΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ»
Hungarian: RÉSZLETES LEÍRÁS A »FELÜGYELT/AKKREDITÁLT MEGBÍZHATÓ HITELESÍTÉSSZOLGÁLTATÓK LISTÁJÁNAK« EGYSÉGES SABLONJÁHOZ
English: In the context of an XML implementation, an xsd file has been made available by ETSI and is provided in its current state in Annex 1. Scheme Information
Greek: TSL version identifier (διάταξη 5.3.1)
English: TSL version identifier (clause 5.3.1) This field is REQUIRED and SHALL be set to ‘3’ (integer).
Greek: Το πεδίο αυτό ΑΠΑΙΤΕΙΤΑΙ και ΘΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ οριστεί στο «3» (ακέραιος αριθμός).
English: It SHALL be set to http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999-93-EC-TrustedList/TSLtype/generic (Generic). Note: In order to comply with ETSI TS 102 231, clause 5.3.3, and to indicate the specific type of TSL while referring to the existence of the present specifications ruling the establishment of the TSL implementation of the Member States' Trusted List [14] and permitting a parser to determine which form of any following fields [15] to expect, where those fields have specific (or alternative) meanings according to the type of the TSL represented (in this case being a Trusted List of a Member State), the above specific URI SHALL be registered and described as follows: URI (Generic) http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999-93-EC-TrustedList/TSLtype/generic
Greek: URI (Γενικά) http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999-93-EC-TrustedList/TSLtype/generic
Hungarian: URI: (generikus) http://uri.etsi.org/TrstSvc/eSigDir-1999-93-EC-TrustedList/TSLtype/generic
English: listing and providing reliable information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers, who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC; facilitating the validation of electronic signatures supported by those listed supervised/accredited certification services from the listed CSPs.
Greek: Ο κατάλογος εμπίστευσης ενός κράτους μέλους παρέχει κάποιες ελάχιστες πληροφορίες για τους εποπτευόμενους/διαπιστευμένους CSP που εκδίδουν αναγνωρισμένα πιστοποιητικά σύμφωνα με τις διατάξεις που ορίζονται στην οδηγία 1999/93/ΕΚ [άρθρο 3 παράγραφοι 3 και 2, και άρθρο 7 παράγραφος 1 στοιχείο α)], συμπεριλαμβανομένων πληροφοριών σχετικά με τα QC που υποστηρίζουν την ηλεκτρονική υπογραφή και σχετικά με το αν η υπογραφή δημιουργείται μέσω μιας ασφαλούς διάταξης δημιουργίας υπογραφής.
Hungarian: The Trusted List of a Member State provides a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3.3, 3.2 and Art. 7.1(a)), including information on the QC supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
Lithuanian: The Trusted List aims at:
English: The applicable ‘supervision’ system (respectively ‘voluntary accreditation’ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3,3, Art. 8,1, Art. 11 (respectively, Art. 2,13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11) Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List and the present TSL implementation at a national level on a voluntary basis.’
Greek: Ο κατάλογος εμπίστευσης και η παρούσα εφαρμογή TSL συμπεριλαμβάνουν εθελοντικά σε εθνική βάση επιπλέον πληροφορίες σχετικά με άλλους εποπτευόμενους/διαπιστευμένους CSP που δεν εκδίδουν QC, αλλά που παρέχουν υπηρεσίες σχετικά με τις ηλεκτρονικές υπογραφές (π.χ. CSP που παρέχουν υπηρεσίες χρονοσφράγισης και που εκδίδουν αδειοδοτικά χρονοσφράγισης, CSP που εκδίδουν μη αναγνωρισμένα πιστοποιητικά κ.λπ.).
Hungarian: Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List and the present TSL implementation at a national level on a voluntary basis.«
English: This SHALL include: Information about the criteria and rules used to select supervisors/auditors and defining how CSPs are supervised (controlled)/accredited (audited) by them;
Greek: Πληροφορίες σχετικά με τα κριτήρια και τους κανόνες που χρησιμοποιούνται για την επιλογή υπεύθυνων για την εποπτεία/τη διαπίστευση και που ορίζουν πώς οι υπεύθυνοι αυτοί εποπτεύουν (ελέγχουν)/διαπιστεύουν (διερευνούν) τους CSP
Hungarian: a felügyelők/ellenőrök kiválasztásra használt szempontok és szabályok, valamint a hitelesítésszolgáltatók vonatkozásában általuk gyakorolt felügyelet (ellenőrzés)/akkreditáció meghatározása,
Estonian: teavet kriteeriumide ja eeskirjade kohta, mida kasutatakse järelevalve teostajate / audiitorite valikul ja selle kohta, kuidas nad CSPde järelevalvet teostavad (kontrollivad) / neid akrediteerivad (auditeerivad);