FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: By Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [2] (the original Regulation) the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India. On 8 March 2006, by Council Regulation (EC) No 366/2006 [3] (the amending Regulation) and following a partial interim review investigation, the anti-dumping duty on imports of PET film originating in India was amended.
Danish: Ved forordning (EF) nr. 1676/2001 [2] (»den oprindelige forordning«) indførte Rådet en endelig antidumpingtold på importen af polyethylenterephthalatfolie (PET-folie) med oprindelse i bl.a. Indien. Efter en delvis interimsundersøgelse blev antidumpingtolden på importen af PET-folie med oprindelse i Indien ændret den 8. marts 2006 ved Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 366/2006 [3] (»ændringsforordningen«).
English: Moreover, according to Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Union institutions are required to comply with the judgment. This also implies the possibility of remedying the aspects of the amending Regulation which led to its annulment, while leaving unchanged the uncontested parts which are not affected by the Court of Justice judgment — as was held in case C-458/98 P [11] (the IPS appeal case). In the light of the above, the claim that there is no legal basis for the partial reopening of a review investigation was found to be unwarranted.
Danish: I henhold til artikel 266 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde (»TEUF«) er EU-institutionerne desuden forpligtet til at efterkomme dommen. Dette indebærer også, at der er mulighed for at afhjælpe de aspekter af ændringsforordningen, som førte til dens annullering, og lade de dele, som ikke anfægtes, og som ikke berøres af Domstolens dom, forblive uændrede — som det blev fastslået i sag C-458/98 [11] (»IPS-appelsagen«). I lyset af ovenstående må påstanden om, at der ikke er noget retsgrundlag for den delvise genoptagelse af en fornyet undersøgelse anses for at være ubegrundet.
English: On 20 May 2010 a notice [8] was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. In the notice parties were informed that, in view of the judgment of the General Court mentioned in recital 5, imports into the European Union of PET film manufactured by MTZ Polyfilms were no longer subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by the amending Regulation and the review Regulation, and that definitive anti-dumping duties paid pursuant to these regulations for the product concerned manufactured by MTZ Polyfilms should be repaid or remitted.
Lithuanian: 2010 m. gegužės 20 d. Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje buvo paskelbtas pranešimas [8], kuriuo šalys informuojamos, kad, vadovaujantis 5 konstatuojamojoje dalyje minėtu Bendrojo Teismo sprendimu, MTZ Polyfilms gaminamai ir į Europos Sąjungą importuojamai PET plėvelei nebetaikomos antidempingo priemonės, nustatytos iš dalies keičiančiu reglamentu ir peržiūros reglamentu, ir kad vadovaujantis šiais reglamentais sumokėti galutiniai antidempingo muitai už MTZ Polyfilms pagamintą nagrinėjamąjį produktą turėtų būti sugrąžinti arba atsisakyta juos išieškoti.
English: The Commission officially advised MTZ Polyfilms, the representatives of the exporting country, the other Indian exporting producers which cooperated in the investigation that led to the adoption of the amending Regulation, and the Union industry of the partial reopening of the investigation. Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to be heard within the time limit set out in the notice.
Slovenian: Komisija je družbo MTZ Polyfilms, predstavnike države izvoznice, druge indijske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so sodelovali v preiskavi, zaradi katere je bila sprejeta uredba o spremembi, ter industrijo Unije uradno obvestila o delni obnovi preiskave Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila.