FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: General conditions applicable to the appointment of independent experts Scope
Lithuanian: Šios bendrosios sąlygos taikomos ekspertų, padedančių Komisijos tarnyboms atlikti užduotis, susijusias su (Europos bendrijos septintąją mokslinių tyrimų, technologijų plėtros ir demonstracinės veiklos pagrindų programa (2007–2013 m.)
English: The task of an expert is to observe the evaluation process in a confidential, fair and equitable way, according to the procedures described in the “Rules on submission of proposals, and the related evaluation, selection and award procedures” and in any programme-specific evaluation document. He/she must use his/her best endeavours to achieve this, follow any instructions given by the Commission to this end and deliver a constant and high quality of work.
Lithuanian: Eksperto užduotis yra konfidencialiai, sąžiningai ir teisingai stebėti vertinimo procesą remiantis Pasiūlymų teikimo taisyklių ir susijusių vertinimo, atrankos ir paramos skyrimo ir bet kuriame programos vertinimo dokumente aprašytomis procedūromis Jis turi dėti visas pastangas šiai užduočiai atlikti, laikytis visų Komisijos tuo tikslu teikiamų nurodymų ir užtikrinti pastovią ir aukštą darbo kokybę.
English: Ethical and security considerations Any proposal which contravenes fundamental ethical principles [10], or which fails to comply with the relevant security procedures [11] may be excluded at any time from the process of evaluation, selection and award (see Annexes A and B). The work programmes implementing the specific programmes may set out specific evaluation criteria or provide further details on the application of the evaluation criteria, which will be reflected in the call for proposals.
Portuguese: Considerações éticas e de segurança As propostas que contrariem princípios éticos fundamentais [10] ou que não cumpram os procedimentos de segurança relevantes [11] podem ser excluídas em qualquer momento do processo de avaliação, selecção e atribuição (ver anexos A e B).Os programas de trabalho de execução dos Programas Específicos podem definir critérios de avaliação específicos ou facultar mais pormenores sobre a aplicação dos critérios de avaliação, que serão transpostos para o convite à apresentação de propostas.
Latvian: Priekšlikumu, kas ir pretrunā ētikas pamatprincipiem [10] vai neatbilst attiecīgajām drošības procedūrām [11], jebkurā laikā var izslēgt no vērtēšanas, atlases un dotāciju piešķiršanas procesa (sk. A un B pielikumu).Darba programmās, ar ko īsteno īpašās programmas, var būt paredzēti īpaši vērtēšanas kritēriji vai sniegta sīkāka papildinformācija par to vērtēšanas kritēriju piemērošanu, kurus izklāsta uzaicinājumā iesniegt priekšlikumus.
English: The database may also be used by the Commission’s Joint Research Centre for the selection of experts in support of research activities carried out as direct actions [19]. To evaluate the proposals submitted in response to a call, the Commission draws up a list of appropriate experts (including, if necessary, a reserve list).
Portuguese: A base de dados também pode ser utilizada pelo Centro Comum de Investigação da Comissão para a selecção de peritos para fins de apoio a actividades de investigação realizadas sob a forma de acções directas [19].Para a avaliação das propostas apresentadas em resposta a um convite, a Comissão elabora uma lista de peritos independentes adequados (incluindo uma lista de reserva, se necessário).
Latvian: Datubāzi ekspertu atlasei var lietot arī Komisijas Kopīgais pētniecības centrs, lai atbalstītu pētniecības darbības, kuras veic kā tiešas darbības [19].Lai novērtētu atsaucoties uz uzaicinājumu iesniegtos priekšlikumus, Komisija izstrādā atbilstošu ekspertu sarakstu (vajadzības gadījumā arī rezerves sarakstu).
English: a reasonable gender balance [20],a reasonable distribution of geographical origins [21], regular rotation of experts [22].
Latvian: samērīgs dzimumu līdzsvars [20],vienmērīgs ģeogrāfiskās izcelsmes sadalījums [21],regulāra ekspertu rotācija [22].
English: In cases where experts will have to deal with classified information, the appropriate security clearance shall be required before appointment [23]. The list of experts to be used for evaluation sessions is decided by the relevant authorising officer by sub delegation or duly appointed delegates.
Portuguese: Nos casos em que os peritos tenham de tratar informações classificadas, são requeridas credenciais de segurança adequadas para a sua nomeação [23].A lista de peritos a utilizar nas sessões de avaliação é decidida pelo gestor orçamental responsável por subdelegação ou por delegados devidamente habilitados.
Latvian: Gadījumos, kad ekspertiem jāstrādā ar klasificētu informāciju, to iecelšanai nepieciešama attiecīgas pakāpes drošības pielaide [23].Par vērtēšanas sesijās pieaicināto ekspertu sarakstu lemj attiecīgais kredītrīkotājs ar pastarpināti deleģētām pilnvarām vai pienācīgi iecelti pārstāvji.
English: In addition, all experts are required to confirm that they have no conflict of interest for each proposal that they are asked to examine at the moment of the evaluation. The declaration makes a distinction between “disqualifying” and “potential” conflicts of interest.
Portuguese: Além disso, todos os peritos deverão confirmar, no momento da avaliação, que não existe nenhum conflito de interesses relativamente a cada proposta que sejam chamados a analisar.A declaração faz uma distinção entre conflitos de interesses “inadmissíveis” e “potenciais”.
Latvian: Turklāt visiem ekspertiem ir jāapstiprina, ka vērtēšanas brīdī viņiem nav interešu konflikta attiecībā uz katru priekšlikumu, kuru viņi ir aicināti novērtēt.Apliecinājumā pastāv atšķirība starp “diskvalificējošu” un “potenciālu” interešu konfliktu.
English: Funding decisions shall be made on the basis of this ranking [32]. The responsible department draws up the final list of proposals for possible funding from those that passed the evaluation thresholds, on the basis of the results of the evaluation by experts.
Portuguese: As decisões relativas ao financiamento são tomadas com base nessa classificação [32].º serviço competente elabora a lista final de propostas selecionadas para possível financiamento entre as que tenham atingido os limiares de avaliação, com base nos resultados da avaliação dos peritos.
Latvian: Pamatojoties uz šo sarindojumu, tiek pieņemti lēmumi par finansējumu [32].Pamatojoties uz ekspertu vērtējuma rezultātiem, atbildīgais departaments iespējamā finansējuma saņemšanai izstrādā vērtēšanas sliekšņiem atbilstošo priekšlikumu galīgo sarakstu.
English: Any proposal that contravenes fundamental ethical principles or which does not fulfil the conditions set out in the work programme or in the call for proposals shall not be selected [34]. In line with Article 54(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, an expenditure co-financed by FP7 shall not receive assistance from the Structural Funds.
Portuguese: Não serão selecionadas as propostas que contrariem princípios éticos fundamentais ou que não satisfaçam as condições estabelecidas no programa de trabalho ou no convite à apresentação de propostas [34]. Em conformidade com o estabelecido no artigo 54.º, n.º 5, do Regulamento (CE) n.º 1083/2006, uma despesa cofinanciada pelo 7.º PQ não pode beneficiar de apoio dos fundos estruturais.
Latvian: Neizvēlas tādus priekšlikumus, kas ir pretrunā ētikas pamatprincipiem vai neatbilst nosacījumiem, kuri izklāstīti darba programmā vai uzaicinājumā iesniegt priekšlikumus [34].Saskaņā ar Regulas (EK) Nr. 1083/2006 54. panta 5. punktu 7. pamatprogrammas līdzfinansētie izdevumi nesaņem atbalstu no struktūrfondiem.
English: Ethics Review Help Desk All FP7 funded projects can request specific assistance on ethical issues from the Ethics Review Help Desk, accessible through the Commission’s FP7 website(s).
Latvian: Visos 7. pamatprogrammas finansētajos projektos īpašu palīdzību ar ētiku saistītajos jautājumos var lūgt Ētikas izvērtēšanas palīdzības dienestam, kas ir pieejams Komisijas 7. pamatprogrammas tīmekļa vietnē(-ēs).
English: The RTD action will become a Classified RTD Action [4] and will be EU-classified at the level of the highest classification of the information used/produced by the RTD action as indicated in the SAL and its annexed SCG, the proposal is too sensitive to be financed because the applicants do not have the appropriate experience, skills or permissions to handle properly the classified information.
Latvian: PTI darbība kļūs par klasificētu PTI darbību [4] un būs klasificēta ES mērogā visaugstākajā klasifikācijas līmenī, ko piemēro informācijai, kura tiek izmantota/radīta PTI darbībā, kā norādīts DAV un tai pievienotajā DKML,priekšlikums ir pārāk jutīgs, lai to finansētu, jo iesniedzējiem nav atbilstošas pieredzes, zināšanu vai atļauju, lai varētu pienācīgi strādāt ar klasificēto informāciju.
English: The address and contact details for any correspondence regarding this appointment are [2]: [name]
Latvian: Adrese un kontaktinformācija visai sarakstei par šo norīkojumu [2]:[Vārds, uzvārds]
English: Proposals with a score passing the thresholds and with a score above this cut-off level will pass to the second stage of evaluation where the full set of evaluation criteria will be applied to the second stage submission. (All proposals with identical scores at the cut off level above will pass through to the second stage of evaluation.)
Dutch: Voorstellen met een score die aan de drempelwaarden voldoet en met een score boven de selectielimiet gaan door naar de tweede fase waarin alle criteria voor de tweede evaluatiestap zullen worden getoetst (alle voorstellen met identieke scores wat bovengenoemde selectielimiet betreft, gaan door naar de tweede evaluatiestap).
English: Proposals with a score passing the thresholds and in addition with a score above this cut off level will pass to the second step of evaluation where the full set of evaluation criteria will be evaluated. (All proposals with identical scores at the cut off level will pass through to the second step of evaluation).
Dutch: Voorstellen met een score die aan de drempelwaarden voldoet en met een score boven de selectielimiet gaan door naar de tweede fase waarin alle criteria voor de tweede evaluatiestap zullen worden getoetst (alle voorstellen met identieke scores wat bovengenoemde selectielimiet betreft, gaan door naar de tweede evaluatiestap).
English: [Funding scheme B: number of proposals] 1-3 4-6 7-9
Polish: [System finansowania A: liczba wniosków]
English: If applicable, the experts will make a recommendation for the funding of projects requesting a higher level of reimbursement for security-related research and technological development activities, where this is justified by the development of capabilities in domains with very limited market size and a risk of “market failure” and for accelerated equipment development in response to new threats [30]. The panel report is signed by at least three panel experts, including the panel “rapporteur” (if an expert was so appointed), and the chairperson.
Portuguese: Se aplicável, os peritos formularão uma recomendação para o financiamento de projectos, solicitando um nível mais elevado de reembolso para actividades de investigação e de desenvolvimento tecnológico relacionadas com a segurança, sempre que tal se justifique pelo desenvolvimento de capacidades em domínios com uma dimensão de mercado muito limitada e com um risco de “deficiência do mercado”, bem como para o desenvolvimento acelerado de equipamentos em resposta a novas ameaças [30].O relatório do painel é assinado, no mínimo, por três peritos do painel, incluindo o “relator” do painel (caso tenha sido designado um perito para o efeito), bem como pelo presidente.
English: Changes to the managerial and scientific aspects would cover, in particular, revisions to the proposed work as established in the negotiation mandate described in section 4.1. The legal aspects would cover, in particular, the verification of the existence and legal status of the participants, review of any special clauses in the grant agreement, or conditions required for the project, and other aspects relating to the development of the final grant agreement (including date of start of project, timing of reports and other legal requirements).
Romanian: Modificările aspectelor manageriale și științifice pot include, în special, revizuiri ale activității propuse, conform mandatului de negociere descris la punctul 4.1 Aspectele juridice pot cuprinde, în special, verificarea existenței și a statutului juridic al participanților, revizuirea oricăror clauze speciale din acordul de grant sau condițiile impuse proiectului și orice alte aspecte legate de elaborarea acordului final de grant (inclusiv data începerii proiectului, calendarul rapoartelor și alte cerințe juridice).
English: the use of hESC is necessary in order to achieve the scientific objectives set forth in the proposal. In particular, applicants must document that appropriate validated alternatives (in particular, stem cells from other sources or origins) are not suitable and/or available to achieve the expected goals of the proposal.
Romanian: dacă este necesar să se recurgă la hESC pentru a se atinge obiectivele științifice prezentate în propunere; în special, solicitanții trebuie să demonstreze, cu ajutorul unor documente, că alternativele validate adecvate (mai ales celulele stem provenind din alte surse sau având alte origini) nu sunt potrivite și/sau disponibile pentru a se atinge obiectivele vizate de propunere.
English: Full proposals for the second stage are submitted and evaluated according to the same procedures as for single stage proposals, as described in section 3. Applicable criteria, thresholds and weightings for this second stage are those set out in the call.
Romanian: Propunerile complete pentru a doua etapă se depun și se evaluează conform acelorași proceduri aplicabile propunerilor depuse în prima etapă, după cum se indică la punctul 3 Criteriile aplicabile, pragurile și ponderările pentru această etapă sunt cele stabilite în anunțul de competiție.
English: The maximum number of days assisting the Commission will not exceed [NUMBER] days]. This includes
Romanian: [Numărul maxim de zile în care veți asista Comisia nu va depăși [NUMĂRUL] zile.] În acestea sunt incluse:
English: scope of the call: the content of the proposal must relate to the topic(s) and funding scheme(s) set out in that part of the work programme open in the call. A proposal will only be deemed ineligible on grounds of “scope” in clear-cut cases.
Slovak: rozsah pôsobnosti výzvy: obsah návrhu sa musí týkať tém(-y) a systému(-ov) financovania v zmysle danej časti pracovného programu otvoreného vo výzve, návrh sa bude považovať za neoprávnený z dôvodov ‚rozsahu‘ len v nesporných prípadoch.
English: The maximum number of days assisting the Commission will not exceed [NUMBER] days. This includes
Swedish: Det maximala antalet dagar som avsätts för att bistå kommissionen ska inte överstiga: Detta omfattar följande:
Slovak: Maximálny počet dní venovaných pomoci Komisii neprekročí [POČET] dní: Patrí tam:
English: The expert must commit to respect applicable national legislation with regard to any payment or reimbursement received from the Commission and with regard in particular to taxation, social security matters and working rights. Upon request by any competent national authorities, the Commission may inform them about any payment made for the performance of the work.
Slovak: Odborník sa musí zaviazať dodržiavať platné vnútroštátne právne predpisy, pokiaľ ide o všetky platby alebo úhrady, ktoré dostane od Komisie, a to najmä týkajúce sa zdanenia, záležitostí sociálneho zabezpečenia a pracovných práv. Na žiadosť príslušných vnútroštátnych útvarov ich Komisia môže informovať o každej platbe vykonanej za plnenie vašich úloh.
English: It works independently. The committee itself does not evaluate the proposal.
Slovenian: Odbor deluje neodvisno, vendar sam po sebi predloga ne ocenjuje.
English: In this case, the expert shall abstain from the discussion (or electronic forum) if the panel discusses in detail the proposal involving the organisation concerned. Such experts will not take part in any hearings, if the proposal concerned reaches the hearing stage.
Swedish: I så fall ska sådana experter avhålla sig från diskussioner (eller från deltagande i elektroniska forum) om panelen i detalj diskuterar de förslag som omfattar den berörda organisationen Sådana experter ska inte delta i intervjuer om de berörda förslagen når intervjustadiet.
English: Experts are required to provide comments to accompany each of their scores. These comments must be consistent with any scores awarded and serve as input to any consensus discussion and related consensus report.
Swedish: Dessa kommentarer ska överensstämma med de betyg som givits och kan användas i eventuella utvärderingsdiskussioner och i de utvärderingsrapporter som sammanställs i samband med sådana diskussioner.
English: Evaluation of a resubmitted proposal In the case of proposals that have been submitted previously to the Commission in FP7, the moderator gives the experts the previous evaluation summary report (see below) at the consensus stage, if the previous evaluation took place under comparable conditions (e.g. broadly similar work programme topics and criteria).
Swedish: För förslag som tidigare lämnats in till kommissionen inom sjunde ramprogrammet ska diskussionsledaren ge experterna tillgång till den tidigare sammanfattande utvärderingsrapporten (se nedan) vid konsensusutvärderingen om den tidigare utvärderingen genomfördes under jämförbara förhållanden (t.ex. liknande ämnen och kriterier i arbetsprogrammet).
English: The coordinators of proposals that have not been rejected, and for which funding is available, are invited to begin negotiations. If this takes place before the Commission ranked list and negotiation mandates have been finalised, the invitation will make clear that negotiations may have to be terminated, or the negotiation mandate modified, if so required following the results of the consultation of other departments.
Swedish: Projektsamordnarna för projekt som inte avvisats och för vilka det finns budgetmedel inbjuds att inleda förhandlingar Om detta sker innan kommissionens ranglista och förhandlingsmandat har slutförts kommer det att anges i inbjudan att förhandlingarna kan komma att ställas in eller förhandlingsmandatet ändras om så krävs efter samrådet med de andra avdelningarna på kommissionen.
English: The letter will specify a deadline for the receipt of any such complaints, which will be 1 month from the date of dispatch of the Commission’s letter. The coordinator should provide the name and identifier of the call, the number (if any), name and acronym of the proposal, and a full description of the alleged shortcomings.
Swedish: I brevet fastställs en tidsfrist för sådana klagomål; normalt sett en månad från det att kommissionens brev skickats ut Samordnaren ska tillhandahålla ansökningsomgångens namn och referens, förslagets nummer (om sådant föreligger) och akronym, samt en ingående redogörelse för de påstådda bristerna i hanteringen.
English: The experts evaluating the research content of the proposals indicate if any ethical issues are raised by a proposal with reference to the “Ethical Issues Table” completed by the applicant. The experts identify those proposals which may require further assessment due to the importance of the ethical issues raised and/or the degree of adequacy of the way the ethical issues are addressed in the proposal.
Swedish: De experter som granskar det vetenskapliga innehållet i projektförslagen ska ange om någon etisk fråga uppstår med avseende på den tabell över etiska frågor som den sökande fyllt i. Experterna ska sortera ut de förslag som kan kräva ytterligare granskning till följd av att de berör viktiga etiska frågor eller på grund av att etiska frågor behandlas på ett otillfredsställande sätt i förslaget.
English: is employed by one of the applicant organisations in a proposal [3]; is a member of one of the 15 Advisory Groups set up by the Commission to provide advice on the preparation of the annual work programmes of the specific programmes of EC FP7 or Euratom FP7;
Swedish: är anställd av någon av projektets ansökande organisationer [3],är medlem i någon av de femton rådgivande grupper som kommissionen inrättat för att bistå med råd vid utarbetandet av de årliga arbetsprogrammen och de särskilda programmen för EG:s och Euratoms sjunde ramprogram,