English: According to the […] study, on p. 15, ‘2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector’.
French: L’analyse […] indique, en page 15: «2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector».
German: In der Analyse […] heißt es auf Seite 15: „2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector.“
Spanish: En la página 15 del estudio […], se señala que «2006 no se puede considerar para hacer la comparación porque La Banque Postale (la nueva entidad tras la transformación de Efiposte en un banco comercial) inició su actividad de crédito al sector privado».
Italian: L’analisi […] recita, a pagina 15: «2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector».
Portuguese: De acordo com o estudo […], página 15, «o ano de 2006 não pode ser considerado na comparação, visto a La Banque Postale (a nova entidade após a transformação da Efiposte em banco comercial) ter iniciado a concessão de empréstimos ao sector privado».
Dutch: Volgens de studie […], op blz. 15: „2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector.”
Danish: Ifølge […]-undersøgelsen, s. 15, »kan 2006 ikke bruges til sammenligningen, eftersom La Banque Postale (den nye enhed efter omdannelsen af Efiposte til en kommerciel bank) det år påbegyndte udlånsaktiviteten til den private sektor«.
Swedish: På s. 15 i […]-studien står det att man inte kan använda 2006 som jämförelseår eftersom La Banque Postale (den nya enheten efter omvandlingen av Efiposte till affärsbank) inledde låneverksamheten för den privata sektorn.
Finnish: […]-analyysin sivulla 15 todetaan: ”2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector”.
Greek: Η ανάλυση […] αναφέρει, στη σελίδα 15: «2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector».
Czech: V analýze […] se na straně 15 uvádí: „2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector“.
Slovak: V analýze […] sa na strane 15 uvádza: „rok 2006 sa nedá použiť na porovnanie, keďže La Banque Postale (nový subjekt po transformácii Efiposte na komerčnú banku) začala s úverovou činnosťou súkromnému sektoru.“
Polish: W analizie […] na stronie 15 stwierdzono: „2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector”.
Hungarian: A(z) […]-ról/-ről szóló tanulmány 15. oldala szerint „az összehasonlításhoz 2006 nem vehető figyelembe, ugyanis a La Banque Postale (az Efipost kereskedelmi bankká való átalakulását követően létrejött új jogalany) megkezdte a magánszektornak történő hitelnyújtási tevékenységet”.
Slovenian: Glede na navedbe študije […], stran 15, „se leto 2006 ne more upoštevati za primerjavo, ker je banka La Banque Postale (nov subjekt po preoblikovanju družbe Efiposte v komercialno banko) začela dejavnost posojanja zasebnemu sektorju.“
Romanian: În analiză […] se arată, la pagina 15: „2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector”.
Bulgarian: Както е посочено на стр. 15 в проучването […]: „2006 г. не може се вземе предвид в сравнението, тъй като La Banque Postale (новата структура след преобразуването на Efiposte в търговска банка) е започнала кредитна дейност за частния сектор“.
Estonian: Vastavalt […] uurimuse lk 15 „ei saa 2006. aastat valida võrdlemiseks, kuna La Banque Postale (uus üksus pärast Efiposte’i muutmist kommertspangaks) alustas laenutegevust erasektorile”.
Latvian: Saskaņā ar […] pētījumu, 15. lpp., “2006. gads nevar tikt izmantots salīdzinājumam, jo La Banque Postale (jaunradītā juridiskā persona pēc Efiposte pārveides par komercbanku) uzsāka aizdevumu izsniegšanu privātajam sektoram”.
Lithuanian: Analizėje […] 15 puslapyje teigiama: „2006 m. nėra tinkami palyginimui, kadangi La Banque Postale (nauja įstaiga Efiposte tapus komerciniu banku) pradėjo skolinimo veiklą privačiame sektoriuje“. ( „2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector“).
Maltese: Fil-paġna 15 tal-analiżi […] jingħad li: “2006 cannot be considered for the comparison since La Banque Postale (the new entity after the transformation of Efiposte in a commercial bank) started the lending activity to the private sector”.