FrancophonIA/DGT-Translation_Memory huggingface dataset:
English: The Commission Decision declared such non-notified schemes unlawful and incompatible and imposed to the Italian State to recover any possible amount disbursed under those schemes [18]. ACEA has challenged that decision before the Court of First Instance [19] and, in that context it has submitted that it had benefited from the relevant scheme.
French: Dans sa décision, la Commission a indiqué que les régimes non notifiés étaient incompatibles et illégaux et a imposé à l’État italien de récupérer les montants éventuellement versés dans le cadre de ceux-ci [18] ACEA a introduit un recours contre cette décision auprès du Tribunal de première instance [19], alléguant ainsi avoir tiré profit du régime en question.
English: Contrary to the claim that Deggendorf should apply only when the decision of the Commission are incontrovertible (e.g. only when they are finally confirmed by a ruling of the Court) [20], the Commission reminds that its decisions have immediate effect and validity, as is recognised by Italy [21]. This is in line with the general principle that appeals do not have any suspension effects (Article 242 EC Treaty).
French: Contrairement à l’affirmation selon laquelle la jurisprudence Deggendorf ne devrait s’appliquer que lorsque la décision de la Commission est définitive (par exemple lorsqu’elle est confirmée définitivement par un arrêt de la Cour) [20], la Commission rappelle que ses décisions sont présumées valables et sortent immédiatement leurs effets, ce que reconnaît d’ailleurs l’Italie [21], conformément à l’article 242 du traité CE, aux termes duquel les recours n’ont pas d’effet suspensif.
English: The first is controlled at 100 % by Electrabel (Belgium). The second is controlled at 40,59 % by Electrabel Italia, and at 59,41 % by ACEA S.p.A.
Hungarian: Az első 100 %-ig a belga Electrabel ellenőrzése alatt áll. A másodikat 40,59 %-ban az Electrabel Italia és 59,41 %-ban az ACEA ellenőrzi.
English: ACEA S.p.A.
Polish: Spółka ACEA SpA (zwana dalej „ACEA”), będąca beneficjentem pomocy, odpowiedziała dnia 8 września 2003 r. Dnia 15 września 2003 r. ww. odpowiedź wraz z licznymi pozostałymi wnioskami została przesłana do Włoch celem przedstawienia uwag.
Latvian: ACEA SpA (še turpmāk “ACEA”), kas ir atbalsta saņēmēja, atbildēja 2003. gada 8. septembrī.
Lithuanian: Bendrovė ACEA, pagalbos gavėja, atsakė 2003 m. rugsėjo 8 d.2003 m. rugsėjo 15 d. minėtas atsakymas kartu su daugybe kitų prašymų buvo išsiųstas į Italiją, kviečiant pateikti savo pastabas.
English: (‘ACEA’), beneficiary of the aid, wrote on 8 September 2003. The letter was sent to Italy for comments, together with a number of other demands, on 15 September 2003.
Polish: Wnioski dotyczyły:
Latvian: Itālijai 2003. gada 15. septembrī tika nosūtīta vēstule, lūdzot sniegt komentārus, kā arī izpildīt vairākas citas prasības.
Lithuanian: Buvo prašoma pateikti:
English: the conditions of transfer of ACEA’s activities to AEP, in particular if the measure under consideration had been taken into account; on which of the activities of ACEA the recovery would impinge.
Polish: objętej odzyskaniem działalności spółki ACEA.
Lithuanian: ACEA veiklos rūšis, kurioms būtų tekę grąžinti.
English: Italy claims that the Commission is making a use of the Deggendorf jurisprudence which is too wide.
Latvian: Itālija uzskata, ka Komisija Deggendorf lietas tiesu praksi attiecina pārāk plaši.
English: It notes that a possible consequence would be that Member States would stop notifying.
Latvian: Tā brīdina, ka šādas rīcības rezultātā dalībvalstis var pārstāt sniegt informāciju.
English: It first recognised that the project intends to reach environmental objectives.
Latvian: Vispirms tā atzina, ka projektam ir ekoloģiska ievirze.
English: ‘It should be noted that, according to settled case-law, where legally distinct natural or legal persons constitute an economic unit, they should be treated as a single undertaking for the purposes of Community competition law (see, to that effect, Case 170/83 Hydrotherm [1984] ECR 2999, paragraph 11, and, by analogy, Case T-234/95 DSG v Commission [2000] ECR II-2603, paragraph 124). In the field of State aid, the question whether there is an economic unit arises primarily in relation to the question whether there is an aid beneficiary (see, to that effect, Case 323/82 Intermills v Commission [1984] ECR 3809, paragraphs 11 and 12).
Latvian: “Jāmin, ka saskaņā ar esošo Tiesas praksi lietās, kad juridiski noteiktas fiziskās vai juridiskās personas veido ekonomisko vienību, Kopienas konkurences tiesību aspektā tās ir jāuzskata par vienu uzņēmumu (skat. lietas 170/83 Hydrotherm [1984] ECR 2999 11. punktu un – pēc analoģijas – lietas T-234/95 DSG pret Komisiju [2000] ECR II-2603 124. punktu).Valsts atbalsta jomā jautājums par ekonomiskas vienības faktu rodas pirmām kārtām saistībā ar jautājumu par atbalsta saņēmēja faktu (skat. lietas 323/82 Intermills pret Komisiju [1984] ECR 3809 11. un 12. punktu).
English: In the case of ASM, the same Decision on case N 614/02 (mentioned in paragraphs 38 and 75) said: ‘In view of the Deggendorf case law [24], the Italian authorities have therefore committed to check if Azienda Sviluppo Multiservizi S.p.A. and the other beneficiaries have indeed benefited of such aid and if so not to grant the present State aid before the unlawful and incompatible State aid previously granted has been reimbursed in line with the above mentioned decision.’
Dutch: In de zaak-ASM wordt in het besluit betreffende Steunmaatregel nr. 614/02 (eerder aangehaald in overwegingen 38 en 75) verklaard dat, in het licht van de rechtspraak in verband met de zaak-Deggendorf [24], de Italiaanse autoriteiten zich dus ertoe hebben verbonden na te gaan of Azienda sviluppo multiservizi SpA (ASM) en de andere begunstigden deze steun hebben genoten en, in voorkomend geval, de bewuste staatssteun niet toe te kennen voordat de onverenigbare en onrechtmatige steun die in het verleden was toegekend, in overeenstemming met genoemde beschikking zou zijn terugbetaald.
English: The project is funded through state resources coming from the budget of the Regional Government, and deriving in particular from the ‘carbon tax’, which was introduced by the Budget Law for the year 1999. The first condition for the existence of an aid is respected.
Portuguese: O projecto é financiado através de recursos provenientes do orçamento do governo regional e, mais precisamente, das receitas da «carbon tax», criada pelo orçamento para 1999, encontrando-se preenchida a primeira condição para a existência de um auxílio.
English: The measure is selective, as it benefits only one producer, initially ACEA and now AEP. The second condition for the existence of an aid is respected.
Portuguese: A medida é selectiva, dado que beneficia uma só empresa, inicialmente a ACEA e actualmente a AEP, encontrando-se preenchida a segunda condição para a existência de um auxílio.
English: In any event, both the ACEA and the Electrabel groups are active in a number of areas, in particular energy and electricity production and distribution, where intra-Community trade takes place. The third condition for the existence of aid is also respected.
Portuguese: Em todo o caso, quer a ACEA quer a Electrabel são empresas que operam em muitos sectores, nomeadamente nos sectores da energia e da produção de electricidade, em que existe comércio intracomunitário, encontrando-se preenchida a terceira condição para a existência de um auxílio.
English: But the Commission, in its appreciation in the State aid area, must go beyond the legal separation. As recently confirmed by the Court of First Instance, with extensive references to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and of the Court of First Instance itself [12].
Portuguese: Todavia, quando avalia os auxílios estatais, a Comissão deve ir além de elementos puramente formais de distinção de sociedades, tal como reiterado recentemente pelo Tribunal de Primeira Instância, baseando-se numa abundante jurisprudência do Tribunal de Justiça e do próprio Tribunal de Primeira Instância [12]:
English: Two other neighbourhoods near Rome — Torrino Sud and Mostacciano — are already linked to the combined heat and electricity power plant by means of district heating pipelines.
Slovenian: Dve drugi soseščini v bližini Rima – Torrino Sud in Mostacciano – sta že povezani s toplarno za kombinirano proizvodnjo toplotne in električne energije s cevovodi daljinskega ogrevanja.
English: The new project represents an extension of the network.
Slovenian: Novi projekt predstavlja podaljšanje omrežja.
English: AEP is controlled at 50 % by Electrabel Italia, and at 50 % by AceaElectrabel. The first is controlled at 100 % by Electrabel (Belgium).
Swedish: AEP ägs till 50 % av Electrabel Italia och till 50 % av AceaElectrabel.
English: An agreement between two parties cannot lead to an exemption from the obligation to reimburse the illegal and incompatible aid. If such an agreement would be accepted, it could lead to the systematic circumvention of the obligation of the companies to reimburse the illegal and incompatible aid.
Swedish: Ett avtal mellan två parter kan inte innebära ett undantag från skyldigheten att betala tillbaka olagligt stöd som inte är förenligt med den gemensamma marknaden.