Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 204]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 9 -116/ Herbert and Barbara Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 5.117/ Tab F Draft, p. 5; parenthetical in original.118/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 9.119/ MEXI 9332, 5/6/64.120/ Ibid.121/ Herbert and Barbara Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 5.122/ See also Section II, A, 3 above.123/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 23. Ms. Goodpasture stated that the case officer handling the project was Thomas Keenan. (Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 34) Thomas Keenan could not remember with certainty the scope of the photographic coverage of the Soviet Embassy gate. (Thomas Keenan Interview, 3/24/78, pp. 3-6.)124/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 28-29.125/ See below for more detail.126/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 5/12/78; Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 10/31/78; CIA File entitled "LIMITED 17 July 63 (J 110) to 9 Dec. 1963 (J 163) from Archives-Job #70.209 Box #1 LIMITED Production Material."127/ Ibid.128/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 2; HSCA Staff Interview of Thomas Keenan, 3/24/78, p. 4; Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 5/12/78; HMMA-31303, 2/7/67 with attached map; HMMA-23343, 4/30/64, para. 2.129/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 2. See also map printed above at p. 32.130/ Classified Staff Summary o: Review of CIA Documents, 5/12/78; Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 10/31/78; CIA File entitled "LIMITED 17 July 63 (J 110) to 9 Dec. 1963 (J 163) from Archives-Job #70.209 Box #1 LIMITED Production Materal."Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 205]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 10 -131/ See above chart.132/ Keenan Interview, 3/24/78, p. 4.133/ Ibid.134/ Ibid.135/ Review of Project LIEMPTY, attachment to HMMA 15979, 11/18/60. Emphasis added. "LIMERICK" is a CIA cryptonym meaning "Soviet."136/ Review of Project LIEMPTY, attachment to HMMA 17999, 10/31/61.137/ See Review of Project LIEMPTY, attachments to HMMA 20052, 10/18/62 and HMMA 22387, 10/25/63.138/ Memorandum from Chief of FI/OPS to Chief of Operations/DDP, 1/8/60.139/ HMMA 14793, 4/8/60, para. 3.140/ HMMA 23343, 4/30/64, para. 2. Emphasis added.141/ Memorandum for the Record, 3/19/78 from Gabielson/Cornwell.142/ Letter from Blakey to Breckinridge, 7/25/78See also JFK Classified Documents #'s 142 and 146.143/ Memorandum entitled "Response to HSCA request of 25 July 1978," 8/20/78; HSCA Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 10/31/73, p. 1. CF. Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 47-51, Goodpasture Deposition, 11/20/78, pp.50-51, where Ms. Goodpasture testified that although the logs and the contact prints from the LILYRIC base are missing, thenegatives are on file at the CIA.144/ Memorandum entitled "Response to HSCA request of 25 July 1978," 8/20/78; HSCA Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 10/31/73, p. 1.145/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 41. HMMA 23343, 4/30/64, para. 2. Win Scott was the Chief of Station in MexicoClassification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 206]
Classification: AR FOR(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 11 -City in 1963. He was a demanding and "hard" boss. (Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 11.) He was also a stickler for detail and for recording information in a retrievable form. (Ibid.; Goodpasture Notes, p. 6; Keenan Interview, 3/24/78, p. 6; Phillips Testimony, 4/25/78, p. 30.)146/ Log Film 144; Keenan Interview, 3/24/78, p. 2.147/ Log Film 144; Goodpasture Notes, p. 8; Tab F Draft, p. 5; Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 41.148/ Ibid.149/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 7.150/ Tab F. Draft, p. 2; Goodpasture Notes, p. 2. In 1962 or 1963 a cut-out was instituted in Alvarez's dealings with the LIMITED photographic base. The films were still developed and processed by Alvarez. (Project Renewal Request, attachment to HMMA-22387, attached to Memorandum for DDP from J. C. King, 11/27/63, section I, B, 1.)151/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 2.152/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 7; Keenan Interview, 3/24/78, p. 2.153/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 33.154/ Ibid.; Keenan Interview, 3/24/78, p. 2..155/ Ibid.156/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 34.157/ Ibid., p. 38.158/ Keenan Interview, 3/24/78, p. 1.159/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 33-38, 14-15.160/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 6/26/78, pp. 3-5; Annual Fitness Report on Ann Goodpasture, 1/14/64.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 207]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 12 -161/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 14-15.162/ Goodpasture Deposition, 11/20/78, pp. 38-39.163/ Ibid., p. 40.164/ Ibid., p. 41.165/ Alan White Deposition, 5/18/78, p. 7.166/ Ibid.167/ Ibid., p. 9.168/ Ibid., p. 15.169/ See H. Manell Deposition, 4/28/78, p. 4 ; where he calls Ms. Goodpasture "an assistant to the Chief of Station;" B. Manell Deposition 4/28/78, p. 9 , where she calls Ms. Goodpasture "Win Scott's right-hand person"; Robert Scelso Deposition, 5/16/78.p.22 , where he calls Ms. Goodpasture "sort of the special assistant to Win Scott"; Robert Shaw Deposition, 5/16/78, p. 11 , where he says that Win Scott "relied very heavily on Ann Goodpasture."170/ Goodpasture Deposition, 11/20/78, p. 34.171/ Ibid., pp. 8-9. See Section II, C, below for detail on the telephone tapping operation.172/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 34-35.173/ Ibid., p. 35.174/ Ibid., pp. 42-43.175/ Ibid.176/ HSCA Deposition of Barbara Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 11-12.177/ HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, p. 15. Herbert Manell was in charge of the Soviet Branch of the CIA Station in Mexico City. Barbara Manell was his assistant.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 208]
Classification(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)-- 13 --178/ *Ibid.*179/ *Ibid.*; Herbert and Barbara Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 3.180/ HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, p. 15; HSCA Deposition of Barbara Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 11-12.181/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 64-69; Arnold Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 4.182/ *Ibid.*183/ Blind Mememorandum entitled "Delay in sending the first cable about Oswald"; Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/15/78, p. 4.184/ *Ibid.*185/ Herbert and Barbara Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 12.186/ Blind Memorandum entitled "Delay in sending the first cable about OSWALD"; Classified HSCA Staff Summary of Review of CIA files, 3/15/78, p 4.187/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 1; Goodpasture Testimony, pp. 12-13; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, p. 6; HSCA Deposition of R. Shaw, pp. 21-24.188/ CIA Component report on wiretap operations prepared by Paul Levister entitled "ZRSOL) and ZRJOINT: Two Telephone Tap Operations," pp. 10-11. Hereinafter cited as Levister Memo. Paul Levister (pseudonym) was a Headquarters technician. He was in Mexico City from 22 September to 1 October, 1963, preparing a report on this electronic intercept operation. (HMMA-22267, 10/8/63, para. 8.) This report will be referred to in some cases in this discussion of the intercept operation. The report, however, was simplified in order "not to risk losing the reader." (Memorandum from Chief, WHD, to COS, Mexico City, 12/30/63, para. 2.) This simplification was mainly in the area of a distinction between reels of tape and transcripts and in the proceduresClassification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 209]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 14 -used in the collection and distribution of the reels and transcripts. (Ibid.) In this discussion of the operation other sources will be relied upon in these areas.In addition to the telephone surveillance maintained by the CIA Station in cooperation with the Mexican Government, the Station also maintained some unilateral surveillance on the Soviets without the knowledge or cooperation of the Mexican oficials. The unilateral surveillance was not directed at the Soviet diplomatic compound but rather at the private apartments of Soviet officials in Mexico City. (Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 56; Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 7; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/′78, p. 7; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 16-17.) There was also unilateral coverage of some Cuban targets. (Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 51-52.) Ann Goodpasture testified that she believed that some of these targets were located in the Cuban diplomatic compound. (Ibid.) Ms. Goodpasture's memory is not borne out by the project file for the unilateral intercept. The only Cuban target of this project was the home of the Cuban Commercial Attache. (HMMA-22536, 11/9/63, para. F.2.)189/ Project Renewal Request, 1/11/63, attachment to HMMA-25141; Goodpasture Notes, p. 5.190/ HMMA 21845, 1/30/63, para. 8.191/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 4; Arehar: Interview, 6/2/78, p. 1; Levister Memo, p. 22.192/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 5; Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 54.193/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 7.194/ Tab F Draft, p. 4; Levister Mem), p. 21.195/ Tab F Draft, p. 4; Memorandum to DDP from Chief WHD, 1/21/64, para..5.196/ Manell Interview, 3/20/78, pp. 1-2; HSCA. Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 4.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 210]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 15 -197/ Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 2; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 7, 3..198/ Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 2.199/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 22-24.200/ Memorandum to the Ambassado: from Winston M. Scott, 10/16/63, re: Lee Oswald/Contact with the Soviet Embassy; Manell Interview, 3/20/78, pp. 17-18; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 21, 31, 36; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 51-52.201/ Phillips Testimony, 11/27/75, p. 19.202/ Ibid., p. 20.203/ HMMA-22005, 8/23/63, para. 4. See also HMMA-22267, 10/8/63, para. 4; HMMA-22135, 9/13/63, para. 4; HMMA-22452, 11/7/63, para. 4 which all list reports of intercepts of American citizens, or English speaking people, in contact with Communists in Mexico. HMMA-21845, 7/30/63, para. 4, reports that the "traffic" is reviewed daily for English speaking persons making contact with the Soviet or Soviet satellite embassies.204/ HMMA 22267, 10/8/63, para. 2.205/ Ibid. In addition to the lines at the Soviet and Cuban compounds, telephones of interest to the Mexicans, lines at the Czechoslovakian and Yugoslavian Embassies were subjects of taps. (HMMA-22267, 10/8/63, para. 2.) The two lines disconnected on 23 September at the Cuban Embassy were put on lines at the Yugoslavian Embassy on the same day. (Ibid.)206/ HMMA 22452, 11/7/63, para. 2.207/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 5/12/78, p. 1.208/ See above; HMMA 22267, 10/18/63, para. 2.209/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 7/26/78, p. 1.Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 211]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 16 -210/ Ibid.211/ See Tab F Draft, p. 4, which states that five Cuban lines were covered; Goodpasture Notes, p. 8, which also states that 5 Cuban lines were covered; and Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 11, and Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 51-53, in which they state their belief that more than three lines in the Cuban diplomatic compound were covered by this liaison intercept operation.212/ Project Renewal Request, 1/11/65, attachment to HMMA 25141, section D, 1, (b), (1).213/ Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 11. See also Section III, A, 3, below.214/ Classified HSCA Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, undated, entitled "Periodic File Summary - Dave Phillips - 3 Components," p. 1.215/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 5; Levister Memo, p. 22.216/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 2.217/ Ibid., Levister Memo, p. 11.218/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 3.219/ Ibid., p. 2; Levister Memo, p. 11; HSCA Deposition of R. Shaw, 5/16/78, p. 20.220/ Ibid. See also Tab F Draft p. 4. Cf. Herbert and Barbara Manell Interview, 3/20/73, p. 8, in whcih the Chief of the Soviet Section in the Mexico City Station claims never to have heard of such summaries.221/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, pp. 2-3.222/ Ibid.; Goodpasture Notes, p. 8; Levister Memo, p. 11; Memorandum from Paul Levister to Chief/FI, 10/2/63, para. 2.223/ Ibid.Classification:Classified by derivation:NW 48327 DocId: 32263889 Page 212
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 212]
Classification(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 1" -224/ Letter from Blakey to Breckenridge, 7/6/78.225/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 2; Levister Memo, p. 11.226/ Ibid.227/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 2.228/ Ibid., p. 4; Project Renewal Request, 1/11/65, attachment to HMMA-25141, Section D, (2).229/ Ibid.230/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 5.231/ Ibid.232/ Ibid., p. 2. The resuma provided quick summaries with the full detailed transcripts arriving at the Station one or two days after the resuma.233/ Ibid.234/ Ibid.235/ Ibid.236/ Ibid., p. 3.237/ Ibid., p. 5.238/ Ibid.239/ Ibid., p. 2.240/ HMMA 22267, 10/2/63, para. 8; HMMA 21845, 7/30/63, para. 8. For handling of English language conversations see Sections II, C, 4, b, (3), (c), (d) and (e) below.241/ DIR 88680, 12/13/63; Goodpasture Testimoy, 4/13/78, p. 63; Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76; p. 43.242/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 3.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 213]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled cocuments.)- 18 -243/ *Ibid*.244/ B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 11.245/ After the assassination Headquarters asked Mexico City not to destroy any of the Soviet tapes from this operation. (DIR 87770, 12/9/63) A note written by Ann Goodpasture in 1963 seems to confirm Arehart's assumption that the tapes were retained at the station.(The Soviet tap operation) people just keep bringing in the reels to me (the ones I give them are not labeled so they don't necessarily know which ones return.) The storage problem is one for us and as the reels come in with transcriptions, I store them. When we can erase them, I'll take off the labels and send them back out.(Note by Ann Goodpasture, 12/10/63, attached to DIR 87770, 12/9/63. Second parenthetical in original.)246/ Zambernardi Interview, 6/3/78, p. 5.247/ *Emphasis added*. Mr. Arehart was absolutely positive that Cuban tapes were retained for thirty days because he maintained them in the special rack. (Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 3.) Hence, the two week "usual practice" is probably not correct insofar as the Cuban tapes are concerned.248/ Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, pp. 40-47.249/ *Ibid*.250/ *Ibid*., p. 47.251/ p. 5.252/ p. 8.253/ p. 61.254/ *Ibid*.; Goodpasture Notes, p. 8; Tab F Draft, p. 5; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 3/28/78, pp. 28-29; Boris Tarasoff Testimony, 4/21/78, p. 7; HMMA-22267, 10/8/63, paras.Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 214]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 19 -3 and 8; ΗΜΜΑ-21845, 7/30/63, paras. 3 and 8; Zambernardi Interview, 6/3/78, p. 4; Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 4.255/ B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 19.256/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, pp. 2-3.257/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 5.258/ Ibid.259/ Ibid. See also Section (e) below.260/ Classified Staff Summary o: Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, pp. 2-4.261/ Levister Memo, p. 32.262/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/1/78, p. 8; Boris and Anna Tarasoff Interview, 4/11/78; Boris and Anna Tarasoff Interview, 11/30/76, p. 17. The Span.sh transcriptions had the name of the Embassy which was taped at the top of the first page of each transcript. (Cranscript here means one day's coverage on one telephone ine.) Following the name of the Embassy, the number of the phone covered is given. The date and times of coverage follow immediately after the phone number. The reel number is also given at the top of the page. Along the left-hand column of the page is the cite to the meter number on the tape recorder where the transcribed conversation is located. Generally, the time that the conversacion occured, and a notation as to whether it is an incoming or outgoing call, appears at the beginning of the transcribed conversations. (Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Document, 3/9/78, p. 1; Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 69-70.) The format of the transcripts from the Cuban Embassy was essentially the same as the format of the Spanish language transcripts from the Soviet Embassy. (Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA documents, 5/12/78, pp. 1-2; Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, pp. 1-2.) Conversations that were in Russian were noted on the Spanish transcript were a number referring to the place on the reel where the conversation occurred (Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, p. 1; CIA Transcript, CIA No. 32.)
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 215]
Classification:(This form is to be ued for material extracted from CIA-controlled cocuments.)- 19263/ Tarasoff Interview, 4/11/78 Tarasoff Interview, 11/30/76, pp. 17-18.264/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 8; B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 9.265/ Ibid. Mr. Tarasoff prepared an original and two carbon copies of all of his transcriptions. All three copies were delivered to the Station. (B) Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 15.) One carbon was cut and pasted onto a separate sheet of paper, with the conversations grouped by identity of the calle: or by subject matter. This was done by Mrs. Tarasoff. (Ibid., and p. 19.) The original, one intact caroon and the one cut up carbon were all delivered to the station. (Ibid.)Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 216]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 20 -266/ B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 9.267/ Ibid., p. 12.268/ Goodpasture Notes, p. 8; Talb/F Draft, p. 5.269/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 61270/ Goodpasture Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 36; Phillips Testimony, 4/12/78, pp. 8-11; B. Manell Deposition, 4/28/78, p. 28.271/ Tab F Draft, pp. 5-6; Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, pp. 36-37.272/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 5; HMMA-22267, 10/8/63, para. 8; HMMA 21845, 7/30/63, para. 8; HMMA-22452, 11/7/63, para. 8.273/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 5.274/ Ibid. The daily resuma for Spanish language conversations (See Section II, C, 4, b, (1), above) largely negated the need for a smiliar procedure for Spanish language conversations in that the important and/or interesting ones were summarized in the resuma.275/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 5.276/ Ibid.277/ Ibid.278/ Ibid.279/ HMMA 22005, 8/23/63, para. 4. See also Levister Memo, p. 19.280/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, pp. 8-12.281/ Ibid.282/ HMMA 22005, 8/23/63, para. 4.283/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 8.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 217]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 21 -284/ *Ibid.*, p. 6.285/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, pp. 8-12.286/ *Ibid.*, p. 12; Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 62-63.287/ *Ibid.*288/ *Ibid.*; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 8.289/ Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 63; Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 14.290/ Manell Interview, 3/20/78, p. 3; Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, pp. 14-16; Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 54, 63.291/ *Ibid.*292/ Project Renewal Request, 1/11/65, attached to HMMA 25141.293/ HMMA-22135, 9/13/63, para. 3; HMMA-22005, 8/23/63, para. 3.294/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, p. 1.295/ B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 7.296/ *Ibid.*, pp. 16-19; Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, pp. 3-4.297/ *Ibid.*, pp. 2-3.298/ B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 30.299/ *Ibid.*, p. 13.300/ *Ibid.*301/ *Ibid.*, p. 14; Manell Interview, 3/20/78, pp. 4 and 11.302/ See Section II above.303/ See Section II, C, 4 above.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 218]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled ciocuments.)- 22 -304/ See Sections II, A and B above.305/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, p. 5; MEXI 7025, 11/23/63.306/ *Ibid.*; CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 9/27/63.307/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, p. 6.308/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, pp. 6-7; CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 9/27/63.309/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, pp. 7-10; MEXI 7025,, 11/23/63; CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 9/27/63.310/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, pp. 10-12, CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 9/28/63.311/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, p. 12; CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/1/63.312/ CIA Mexico City Investigat: on Chronology, Bulky #WX-7241, Vol. I, p. 3. The transcript of this call does not give the time the call occured. (CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/1/63 )313/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, pp. 12-14; CIA Transcrip: from the Russian Embassy, 10/1/63.314/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78, p. 14; CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/3/63.315/ DIR 74830, 10/10/63. See also MEXI 6453, 10/8/63 and Section IV, B, below.316/ DIR 74830, 10/11/63. (Mexico City copy.)317/ *Ibid.*318/ *Ibid.*Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 219]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 23 -319/ Classified HSCA Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 5/12/78, p. 1. On September 27, 1963, at 10:54 a.m., the following call occured. A woman named Silvia named Guillermo Ruiz. Ruiz tells her that he has not yet been able to reach the consul and because of that he has not called her. Silvia tells him that "we" have no time for that and asks him for the Consul's phone number. Ruiz responds by asking her not to get annoyed and he wants to know if Silvia wishes to speak to the Consul personally. Silvia responds that she does. Ruiz says that the number is 11-28-47. Silvia says that is fine and the conversation ends. (CIA transcript from Cuban Embassy, 9/27/63.) It cannot be determined whether this caller was indeed Silvia Duran or if she subsequently called the Consul since Duran's office phone was not tapped. The tap was on the telephone used by Ruiz.320/ Classifed Staff Summaries of Review of CIA Documents, undated and 5/12/78.321/ See Sections II, A and B above.322/ See Sections II, C, 4, b, (2), (c) and (d) above.323/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12,78.324/ See Section III, A, 1 above.325/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12,′78, p. 4.326/ Ibid.327/ Ibid., p. 6.328/ Ibid.329/ Ibid.330/ Ibid.331/ Ibid. See also Sections II, C, 4, b, (3), (c) and (e), above.Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 220]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled cocuments.)- 24 -332/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, pp. 7-8.333/ *Ibid*.334/ See Section II, C, 4 b, (3), (e) above.335/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, pp. 7-8.336/ *Ibid*., p. 9.337/ *Ibid*., p. 10.338/ B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 25.339/ *Ibid*., p. 26.340/ *Ibid*.341/ *Ibid*., p. 27.342/ *Ibid*., p. 33.343/ *Ibid*.344/ See Section II, C, 4, b, (3), (e), above.345/ See Section III, B below.346/ Blind Memo re: Lee Harvey Oswald/Silvia Tirado de Duran, Source: LI/4, 11/26/63, p. 5.347/ A. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, p. 10. It is also in- teresting to note that Ms. Duran's statement that Oswald had blond hair, is also left out of subsequent CIA and Mexican official reports. (See Section V, C and VI, A below.)348/ Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, pp. 52-53.349/ Daniel Stanley Watson Interview, 6/4/78, p. 1.350/ *Ibid*., p. 2.351/ *Ibid*. James Angleton testified that he had in fact cleaned out Win Scott's safe but that he had not found anyClassification:Classified by derivation:NW 48327 DocId: 32263889 Page 221.