Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 221]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 25 -photographs or intercept transcripts pertaining to Lee Harvey Oswald. (HSCA Deposition of James Angleton, 10/5/78, p. 116.)352/ Classified Letter from Blakey to Breckinridge, 7/6/78.353/ Draft of letter from Scott to John Barron, 11/25/70, p. 3. Emphasis added.354/ Foul Foe manuscript, p. 267.355/ See discussion above.356/ Blind Memo re: Lee Harvey Oswald/Silvia Tirado de Duran; Source: LI/4, 11/26/63, p. 5.357/ See Sections V, C and VI, A, below.358/ Eusebio Azcue Public Testimony, 9/18/78, pp. 33-35.359/ See Section II, C, 3 above.360/ See Sections II, A and B, above.361/ See below.362/ See below.363/ It should be noted that the two sets of photographs which are missing are the most relevant of all the photographs produced by the Mexico City surveillance operations. Had a photograph of Oswald been obtained, it would have most likely have been done by one or both of the bases from which production is missing. Oswald visited the Cuban Consulate which was covered by a pulse camera. The photographs of people entering the Cuban Embassy have been made available to this Committee for review but the material from the pulse camera which covered the entrance to the Consulate which Oswald visited has not been forthcoming. (See Section II, A, 3, above, for details.) The documented standard operating procedure of the Soviet target bases indicates that LILYRIC, the base from which production was not forthcoming, would have been the one in operation at the time ofClassification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 222]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 26 -364/ Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 95; HSCA Deposition of Elsie I. Scaletti, 5/19/78, p. 65; HSCA Deposition of Allen White, 5/18/78, p. 42; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/73, p. 51; Ann Goodpasture, 4/13/78, p. 98.365/ See preceding Section III, A, 1. In fact, Oswald may have visited the Soviet Embassy 3 times also. See analysis in Classified Letter from Turner to Stokes 10/25/78, JFK Classified Document #146.366/ Zambernardi Interview, 6/3/78, p. 6.367/ See Section III, A, 1, above.368/ See Sections II, A and B, above.369/ See Sections II, A, 3 and I, B, 3 above.370/ HSCA Outside Contact Report:, Phillip Agee, 1/6/78, JFK Document No. 004578.371/ Phillip Agee Interview, 1/1/78, p. 1, JFK Document No. 004633.372/ Ibid., p. 3.373/ "Elsie Scaleti" is the CIA assigned pseudonym of this individual.374/ Agee Interview, 1/11/78, pp. 3-4.375/ Ibid.376/ Ibid.377/ Ibid.378/ Ibid.Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 223]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 27 -379/ Ibid., pp. 5-6.380/ Ibid., pp. 6-7.381/ Ibid., p. 11.382/ Ibid., pp. 18-19.383/ Ibid., p. 12.384/ Daniel Stanley Watson Interview, 6/4/78, p. 1.385/ Ibid.386/ Ibid.387/ Ibid.388/ Ibid.389/ Ibid.390/ Ibid.391/ Ibid.392/ Ibid.393/ Ibid. and p. 2.394/ Ibid., p. 2.395/ See HSCA Deposition of James Angleton, 10/5/78, p. 116.396/ Watson Interview, 6/4/78, p. 2.397/ Ibid.398/ Joseph B. Smith Interview, 10/19/77, p. 2, JFK Document No. 003012.399/ Ibid.400/ Ibid.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 224]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 28 -401/ Joseph B. Smith Interview, 4/20/78, p. 1, JFK Document No. 008279.402/ Ibid., p. 6.403/ Ibid.404/ Ibid.405/ Ibid.406/ Ibid.407/ Ibid.408/ Ibid., and p. 7. Des Fitzgerald was the Chief of the CIA'S Cuban Task Force in 1964. Droller was a CIA Officer.409/ Ibid., p. 7. Mr. Smith explained the "Counter-Intelligence mentality" by saying that people who had it were "rabid anti-Communists" (Smith Interview, 11/2/77, p. 3, JFK Document No. 003012) and "confirmed believers in the world Communist conspiracy theory... These guys actually believed that the split between the Russians and Chinese was a great deceptive operation. Colby (former Director of Central Intelligence) even says something more amazing. He claims that Angleton absolutely believed that all CIA operations were run by the KGB, (Soviet Intelligence.) He says Angleton (former Chief of Counter-Intelligence for the CIA) believed that every top Soviet defector we took in was a plant. I think that's incredible but I know there were some guys on his staff were his true believers." (Smith Interview, 4/20/78, p. 3, JFK Document No. 008279.)410/ Ibid., p. 7.411/ Ibid.412/ Ibid.413/ Ibid.414/ Joseph Piccolo Interview, {/11/78, p. 1.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 225]
Classification: TOP SECRET(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 29 -415/ *Ibid.*, p. 4.416/ *Ibid.*417/ *Ibid.*418/ *Ibid.*419/ *Ibid.*420/ *Ibid.*, p. 4.421/ *Ibid.*, p. 4422/ *Ibid.*, p. 5.423/ *Ibid.*424/ *Ibid.*425/ *Ibid.*426/ *Ibid.*427/ *Ibid.*428/ *Ibid.*429/ *Ibid.*430/ *Ibid.*431/ *Ibid.*, pp. 4-5.432/ *Ibid.*, p. 6.433/ Dan Neiscuir Interview, 8/29/78, p. 1, JFK classified Document No. 156.434/ *Ibid.*435/ *Ibid.*436/ *Ibid.*Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 226]
Classification:(This form is to be used fo material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 30 -437/ Ibid.438/ Ibid.439/ Ibid.440/ Ibid.441/ Ibid.442/ Ibid.443/ Ibid.444/ In considering the above detailed allegations, it is important to distinguish between the allegation that a photograph was found at headquarters as opposed to the assertion that a photograph was found in Mexico City. It is also important to remember that these allegations are what can be termed "grapevine stores." There was a photograph found in Mexico City of a man that was thought possibly to be Oswald. This photograph and the circumstances surrounding it will be dealt with in a subsequent section. Ms. Arne Goodpasture of the Mexico City Station found this photograph. (See below.) In the absence of any evidence otherwise--Note: The Watson allegation says there was a photo in Mexico City in the mid-60's; not that it was found there--it is most likely that the grapevine stories about a photo being found in Mexico arise from M:3. Goodpasture's report-ing the photo of the man who has since become known as the Mexico mystery man in the same cable that reported Oswald's visit to the Soviet Embassy. (See below.) The findings of this Committee regarding the general Mexico City surveillance operations are presented in Section II, A and B above. In summary, this Committee found that there were three photographic surveillance bases (four cameras) that may have photographed Lee Harvey Oswald in September and October of 1963. This was determined from analysis of project files for these operations and the testimony of CIA officials. (See preceding sections.)445/ Letter from Blakey to Carpentier, 3/2/78, JFK Document No. 005879.Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 227]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 3 -446/ See JFK Classified Document No. 146; HSCA Classified Staff Summary of Review 0: CIA Documents, undated; HSCA Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 5/12/78; JFK Classified Document No. 142; and Sections II, A, 4 and II, B, 3 above.447/ See JFK Classified Document No. 142; JFK Classified Document No. 146.448/ HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, pp. 37, 96; HSCA Deposition of Ann Elizabeth Goldsborough Egerter, 5/17/78, p. 73; HSCA Deposition of Robert Shaw, 5/16/78, p. 56; HSCA Deposition of Allen White, 5/18/78, p. 25; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 20, 47; David Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 67; David Phillips Testimony, 4/25/78, p. 44; Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 77, 97.449/ HSCA Deposition of Elsie Scaleti, 5/19/78, pp. 6-7.450/ Elsie Scaleti Interview, 3/30/78, pp. 3-4.451/ Ibid.452/ Ibid.453/ Ibid.454/ HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 31.455/ Ibid.456/ In addressing this questior, the HSCA staff reviewed all the cable and dispatch traffic between Mexico City and Headquarters for the period from October 1, 1963 to 26 November 1963 in an attempt to determine whether Oswald's photo may have been sent to Headquarters. This examination also revealed no evidence that a photograph of Oswald was sent to CIA Headquarters. This Committee did find that there were several types of communications between Headquarters and field stations that were treated as non-record material. Because of the non-record nature of these communications, it was not possible to review that material.Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 228]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 32 -457/ See Section II, A, 3 above.458/ ΗΜΜΑ 22307, 10/18/63, para. 5, c.459/ See Section II, A, 3 above.460/ Ibid.461/ ΗΜΜΑ 22433, 11/7/63, attachments B and C.462/ HSCA Deposition of Elsie Scaletti, 5/19/78, pp. 44-47.463/ HSCA Deposition of Ann E. C. Egerter, 5/17/78, p. 70; HSCA Deposition of John Scelsc, 5/16/78, p. 31.464/ Ibid.465/ Ibid., and p. 32.466/ Ibid., p. 7.467/ Ibid., p. 47.468/ Ibid. Emphasis added.469/ Foul Foe manuscript, p. 273.470/ See Section III, A, 1 above for a more detailed exposition of the conversations.471/ Memorandum to Clark Anderson from Winston Scott, 11/27/63, with seven attachments.472/ Ibid.473/ Ibid., p. 1.474/ Ibid.475/ Ibid., p. 9.476/ Warren Commission Testimony of Pamela Mumford, 5/19/64, Vol. II, p. 217; Warren Commission Testimony of Evaristo Rodriguez, 7/21/64, Vol. II, p. 341; Commission ExhibitClassification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 229]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 33 -2120, p. 7; Commission Exhibit 2121, p. 54. CF, Warren Commission Testimony of Nelson Delgado, Vol. VIII, p. 236 and 237 in which is claimed that Oswald spoke Castillian Spanish.477/ CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/3/63.478/ If one assumes that Oswald could not speak any Spanish then only two conclusions about the first three calls of 9/27/63 are possible: 1) either these calls do not pertain to Oswald, or 2) they do pertain to Oswald but were made by someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald. This second possible conclusion will be addressed in a more detailed fashion in subsequent sections due to its ramifications vis a vis Oswald's activities and possible associates as opposed to the substance of the information available to the CIA Station prior to the assassination.479/ Warren Commission Exhibit 2121, p. 112.480/ Classified Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 3/9/78.481/ CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/1/63; MEXI 6453, 10/8/63. This cable was sent from Mexico on 8 October and was received by Headquarters on 9 October. Hence, it is alternately referred to as either the 10/8 or 10/9 cable.482/ CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/1/63; B. Tarasoff Testimony, 4/12/78, pp. 6-28.483/ CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/1/78.484/ CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 9/28/63.485/ A "P" file is simply a personality file. It was the Mexico City Station equivalent of a 201 file.486/ Ibid.Classification:Classified by derivation:NW 48327 DocId: 32263889 Page 230
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 230]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 34 -487/ HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, p. 38; HSCA Deposition of Barbara Manell, 4/28/78, p. 72.488/ Ibid.489/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 46.490/ Ibid.; CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 9/27/63.491/ Ibid.492/ Ibid.; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 76.493/ Ibid., HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 46.494/ HSCA Deposition of Barbara Manell, 4/28/78, p. 69; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 38-39,495/ HSCA Deposition of Alan White, 5/18/78, pp. 33-34; HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, p. 46; HSCA Deposition of Barbara Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 84-86, 88-89.496/ Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 107; MEXI 6453,10/8/63, para. 2.497/ 1977 CIA Inspector General's Report, Tab G-2, pp. 2-3. Hereinafter cited as '77 IGR.498/ See Sections III, B, 2, above, and IV, B, below.499/ D. Phillips Interview, 8/24/78; Report on Oswald from John Scelso to J. Angleton, 12/24/63, p. 4.500/ Ibid.501/ CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 9/27/78.502/ Ibid.503/ See Section II, C, 4, b, (3), above.504/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manel, 4/28/78, p. 72; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/8, p. 38.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 231]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 35 -505/ CIA Transcript from Soviet Embassy, 9/27/63; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 76.506/ CIA transcripts from Russiar. Embassy, 9/27/63.507/ Tab F Draft, p. 5.508/ Arehart Interview, 6/2/78, p. 4-5.509/ ΗΜΜΑ-22005, 8/23/63, para. 4; see also Section II, C, 4. above.510/ Ibid.511/ Ibid.; Arehart Interview, 6,'2/78, p. 5; Testimony of B. Tarasoff, 4/12/78; p. 10.512/ Testimony of Boris Tarasoff 4/12/78, p. 11; Testimony of A. Tarasoff, 4/12/78, ). 14.513/ Tab F Draft, p. 5.514/ Ibid.515/ Tab F Draft, p. 5; Preceding Section II, B, 5; Log Film 144. 10/1/63 through 10/3,63.516/ See Nightwatch, pp. 140-141.517/ David A. Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 64.518/ ΜΕΧΙ 6453, 10/8/63.519/ Ibid.520/ Ibid.521/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 58; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 35.522/ Classified HSCA Staff Summary of CIA documents, undated, entitled "Periodic File Summary - Dave Phillips - 3 Components."Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 232]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)523/ Blind Memorandum entitled "Delay in Sending the first Cable about Oswald."524/ HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, p. 30.525/ Tab F Draft, p. 5; MEXI 6453, 10/8/63; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 62-63; HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/63, p. 21.526/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 56-57.527/ Classified HSCA Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 6/26/78, p. 4.528/ Ibid.529/ Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 65. Cf. "Foul Foe" manuscript, p. 268, where Win Scott writes: "In fact, Lee Harvey Oswald became a person of great interest to us during this 27 September to 2 October 1963 period"; and on page 269, where he writes: "Because we thought at first that Lee Harvey Oswald might be a dangerous potential defector from the U.S.A. to the Soviet Union, he was of great interest to us, so we kept a special watch on him and his activities."530/ HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 25.531/ HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 25-26.532/ HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 26.533/ HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, p. 36.534/ See above. Cf. "Foul Foe' manuscript, pp. 268-269.535/ HSCA Deposition of Barbara Manell, 4/28/78, p. 52.536/ HSCA Deposition of Alan White, 5/18/78, p. 26-28.537/ Ibid.538/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 30.Classification:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 233]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 3 -539/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 51-52. The HSCA has requested a copy of any internal regulations or any liaison agreement with the Federal Bureau of Investigation that may have been in existence in 1963. (Letter to Breckinridge, 7/20/78.) The CIA responded "that there are not now, nor were there any, agreements between the CIA and FBIo other U.S. government agencies concerning CIA responsibility to report on contacts of U.S. citizens with Communist Embassies or officials... The CIA under operative legislation has a counterintelligence responsibility for counterintelligence cases but it is notamatter of agreement with other agencies nor does it concern simple contacts of Americans abroad with Communist Embassies or officials." (Memorandum to Breckinridge from Shepanes, 7/31/78.)540/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 69; HSCA Deposi-. tion of H. Manell, 4/28/73, pp. 38-39,541/ See Section III, B, 2, above.542/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 59-60.543/ Ibid., p. 62.544/ Ibid., p. 59.545/ MEXI 6453, 10/8/63, para. 1.546/ Tab F Draft, p. 5; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 62-63, 66; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 21; MEXI 6453, 10/8/63, para. 1.547/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 62-63.548/ MEXI 6453, 10/8/63, para. 2. The connection of this photograph to Oswald by including the description in the cable that reported Oswald's contact with the Soviet Embassy has created more confusion and controversy than perhaps any other CIA related issue stemming from assassination. Consequently, this Committee has made an attempt to determine the circumstances surrounding the mistaken linkage of this photograph to Oswald as well as the consequences of that mistake. The consequencesClassification:Classified by derivation:NW 48327 DocId: 32263889 Page 234
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 234]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 38 -of the mistake will be dealt with in more detail in subsequent sections.549/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 33; HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 35; Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 81, 86-87.550/ HSCA Deposition of Allan White, 5/18/78, p. 28.551/ Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 107. See also Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 84; and HSCA Deposition of Allan White, 5/18/78, p. 32.552/ Log Film 143, 9/25/63 through 9/27/63.553/ HSCA Deposition of Ann Goodpasture, 11/16/70, pp. 57-58.554/ CIA Transcript from Russian Embassy, 10/1/63.555/ This mistake was evidently not discovered until 1976. See WX7241, a chronology of the Mexico City investigation prepared by Raymond Rocca in 1967 which lists the date as 1 October; A note on FMMW-15488, 5/18/67 which indicates that Ann Goodpasture checked the photographs and that "negatives are in LIMITED photo chrono for 1 Oct 1963."556/ Log film 144, 10/1/63 through 10/3/63.557/ Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 102.558/ See Classified HSCA Staff Summary of Review of CIA Documents, 6/26/78, pp. 3-5.559/ DIR 84888, 11/23/63.560/ See Section III, A, 5 above.561/ MEXI 6453, 10/9/63.562/ Ibid.563/ HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 34; HSCA Deposition of Elsie Scaleti, 5/19/78, p. 26.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 235]
Classification:(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 39 -564/ Ibid.565/ Ibid.566/ Ibid. A restricted file is a method of keeping abreast of any information that develops on the subject of the file. The file is marked to indicate that it cannot be reviewed without the permission of the person who made the restriction. The effect is that if anyone wants to see the file, the custodian of the file learns of that desire and the information leading to it. (HSCA Deposition of Ann E. G. Egerter 5/19/78, p. 51.)567/ See Section568/ HSCA Deposition of A. Egerter, 5/17/78, p. 77.569/ Deposition of Elsie Scaleti 5/19/78, p. 29.570/ HSCA Deposition of Ann Egerter, 5/17/78, pp. 78-79.571/ Ibid., pp. 70-71; HSCA Deposition of Elsie Scaleti, 5/19/78, p. 33.572/ Ibid. The Zed (Greenwich) times stamped on the cable and the teletype indicates that the teletype was sent before the cable.573/ DIR 74830, 10/10/63.574/ Ibid.575/ Ibid.576/ Ibid.577/ Teletype from CIA to State, FBI and Navy, DIR 74678, 10/10/63.578/ Ibid.579/ The mistaken identification of Oswald as "Lee Henry" is dealt with in another section of this final report.580/ HSCA Deposition of A. Egerter, 5/17/78, p. 77.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 236]
Classification: FOR SECRET(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 40 -581/ HSCA Deposition of Elsie Scaleti, 5/19/78, pp. 34-35.582/ *Ibid*.583/ *Ibid.*, pp. 35-37/584/ Elsie Scaleti Interview, 3/30/78, p. 8.585/ *Ibid.*, pp. 11-13.586/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 37.587/ HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 51.588/ Report on Oswald from John Scelso, C/WH/3, to James Angleton, C/CI, 12/24/63, p. 4.589/ HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, pp. 40-43. Emphasis added.590/ *Ibid*.591/ See preceding text.592/ HSCA Deposition of Elsie Scaleti, 5/19/78, p. 31.593/ *Ibid.*, p. 30; See also HSCI. Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, pp. 27, 28.594/ See HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, pp. 40-43, 51; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 37; HMMA-22005, 8/23/63, para. 4.595/ '77 IGR, Tab G.3, p. 3.596/ *Ibid*.597/ Teletypes from CIA to State, FBI and Navy, 10/10/63, DIR 74678.598/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 43; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/18, pp. 89-90.Classification:Classified by derivation:
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 237]
(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 41 -599/ David A. Phillips Testimony, 4/25/78, p. 30.600/ HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 90-91; Ann Goodpasture Testiony, 4/13/73, p. 142.601/ David A. Phillips Testimony, 4/25/78, pp. 92-93.602/ Scott's manuscript may provide a clue when he writes that during his first contact with the Soviet Embassy, Oswald "gave his name very slowly and distinctly." (Foul. Foe Manuscript, p. 267.) If Oswald used his middle name at that time it would explain why Scott wrote "sic." by "Henry." But it should be noted that Oswald's name does not come up in any of the transcripts made available by the CIA until 10/1/63, and Oswald's middle name is not given in that transcript. It is possible that there is one additional transcript, possibly of the conversation that Scott, or page 267 of his manuscript, refers to as Oswald's "first contact," which, if in existence, has not been made available to this Committee. (See Section III, A, 5, above.)603/ DIR 74830, 10/11/63.604/ HSCA Deposition of Allan White, 5/18/78, p. 35; Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13,′78, p. 104.605/ Ann Goodpasture Testimony 4/13/78, p. 105.606/ *Emphasis in original*.607/ Routing and Record Sheet for DIR 74830, 10/11/63..608/ HSCA Deposition of Alan White, 5/18/78, pp. 33-34; HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, p. 46; HSCA Deposition of B. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 84-86, 88-89.609/ HSCA Deposition of H. Manell, 4/28/78, pp. 43-44; David A. Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 89.610/ HSCA Deposition of Allan White, 5/18/78, p. 37.611/ See Section III, A, 7, above.
[180-10110-10484.pdf — page 238]
Classification: TOP SECRET(This form is to be used for material extracted from CIA-controlled documents.)- 42 -612/ See Section III, A, 1, above.613/ Note on Article by Robert S. Allen and Paul Scott, "CIA Withheld Vital Intelligence from Warren Commission," 10/21/64.614/ The Chief of the Mexico Branch at Headquarters has told this Committee that it is his belief that the tapes were probably still in existence at the time of the assassination. (HSCA Deposition of John Scelso, 5/16/78, p. 76-77.) But the tesitmony of the persons at the Mexico City Station is consistent in saying that the tapes did not exist at the time of the assassination. (See HSCA Deposition of Fobert Shaw, 5/16/78, p. 29; HSCA Deposition of Allan White, 5/18/78, p. 20; David A. Phillips Testimony, 11/27/76, p. 63; David A. Phillips Testimony, 4/25/78, pp. 17, 23; Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 94.)615/ See Section II, C, 4, b, (3), (e); Tab F Draft, pp. 5-6.616/ If the 9/28/63 conversatior received expedited handling also it is possible that it would have been in the Station prior to the first or second of October.617/ A. Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 95.618/ DIR 84886, 11/23/63, para. 2.619/ MEXI 7023, 11/23/63, para. 2.620/ MEXI 7025, 11/23/63, para. 4.621/ MEXI 7054, 11/24/63, para. 3.622/ See discussion in text above and below.623/ See Section II, C, 4, above.624/ Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, p. 94.625/ Ann Goodpasture Testimony, 4/13/78, pp. 95-96; See also pp. 77, 93, 110.Classification:Classified by derivation: