Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 65]
- 62 -circumstances can be conceived of whereby even though formal and informal Agency ties are discontinued, social and other ties remain. The impact of such liaisons is difficult to assess. The following entities were dissolved during the referenced period:
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 66]
- 63 -ENTITIES DISSOLVEDAIR SUPPORTWUSOLID/WUTRADEWUSOLID/WUTOPSYWUDERRICK/WUCLUBHOUSEWUCLOAK/WUOCEANWUCLOAK/WUSEASIDEWUCLOAK/WUSNAPPYIUQUEST/IUPROTONWUBETON/WUGLOBALWUBETON/WUAISLEWUSHINE/WUINVESTWUSHINE/WUREBELWUGAZELLE/WUEASELWUGAZELLE/WUGIRAFFEWUPADDY/WUTROUBLEMARITIME SUPPORTYOENTITY/YODOORYOENTITY/YOMONEYYOTARTIUMUGIUHISTEP/IULAPELIUHISTEP/IULATCHOPERATIONAL SUPPORTLPTACTIC/LPDECORWUTACTIC/WUDARELPTACTIC/LPDRAGONLPTACTIC/WUELECTLPTACTIC/LPFINALWUTACTIC/WUFLOODWUTACTIC/WUGAMPLPTACTIC/LPHUMIDWUTACTIC/WUIMPORTWUTACTIC/WUKIWAWUTACTIC/NERVELPTACTIC/LPPITCHWUTACTIC/WUROCKYWUTACTIC/WUSUMMITWUTACTIC/LPWAMPUMLPTACTIC/LPWHISPERLPTACTIC/LPORDERTAB A
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 67]
(OPERATIONAL SUPPORT - Cont'd)WUTACTIC/WUABOUTLPTACTIC/LPACROSSWUTACTIC/WUBAILLPTACTIC/LPCAREFREEWUTACTIC/WUCHAOSCOVER SUPPORTSTLARGOSTMODSTLADSTUPLIFT/STKNAPSTUPLIFT/STPACERMIPACT/MIHOLDINGHALARCMIPACT/MOPUSHERCYTABARDWUDIRK/WUCURULEWUDIRK/WUBODKINWUENTREE/WUMORELWUPANEL/WUCORALWUPILOT/WUTWINELPBYZAS/AWUBRINY/WUTROCHUSLPDICTUM/FLPDICTUM/PLPMINERAL/LPCHICKENLPARCH/LPDUCATWUATLAS/GIBLUFFACCOUNTING & MANAGEMENTQUBUZZMHAMISHLPPANDA/LPCHAIR/BLPBERRY/AWUSUNTAN/WUFLAMEWUSUGAR/BINSURANCEMHANVIL/BMHANVIL/DMHANVIL/FMHSPRAYMHKEVELMHNAVALTAB APage 2
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 68]
COVERT PROCUREMENTWUMINOR/IWUMINOR/WUHALIBUTLPMINOR/LPMETALWUMINOR/PULSEIUAIREDALE/IUOASISFOUNDATION OR INSTITUTEAEWILDFIRELPUNITY/1MEDIAUOACORN/VOACTORFUSEEYOYARDTOMOSAIC/TOHAWKBITCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTWUETHNIC/MODAISYWUETHNIC/LPHALTERWUETHNIC/LPCYHAMMERWUETHNIC/LPTOTEMPERSONAL SERVICESMKCRUSH/MKPΕΝΝΥMKCRUSH/MKCOTTONBEUSEFULBGJAGUARENDOMORPH/ENGAGEINVESTMENTLPDICTUM/KLPDICTUM/LPSPICELPDICTUM/WUSALINERESEARCH & DEVELOPMENTMHSHANKTAB APage 3![RECEIVED FROM DEC 10 1975]![SECRET]
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 69]
# SECRETTAB AENTITIES DISSOLVEDAIR SUPPORTJBGREED/JBCRYING (In Liquidation)JBGREED/QKHEAVERLY (In Liquidation)JBGREED/QKHEEDFUL (In Liquidation)JBGREED/JBCHOKE (In Liquidation)ZRBENCHWUBETON/ WULOBSTERMARITIME SUPPORTYOBLADEAMCRAFTAMSALLYMEDIA AND/OR PUBLICATIONSESMIDWAYAMIDEAAMWIDE (SLOGAN)AMRAPTWURABBITINSTITUTE OR FOUNDATIONLPWANDER/1LPWANDER/2LPWANDER/3LPWANDER/4JMCLIPPERQKBOTTOMQRBIBBPBGREGALEQRTRIGCOVER SUPPORTJMDUSKFUARROWYQFLUXKGHELMSMANECIRONGINSENG/GSECRET
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 70]
- 67 -  SECRETTAB AENTITIES DISSOLVED (Continued)OPERATIONAL SUPPORT*   LPGLOBE/WASH*   SLIGO*   SLAPJACKLOGISTICS SUPPORT*   STOCK ACCOUNT #2*   KMFERRY*   KMKANGANI*   MHOLENT*   OPSOMICMANAGEMENT & ACCOUNTING*   LPPANDA/LPCLOUDINVESTMENT*   WUVENTURE/WUABLE*   WUVENTURE/WUBAKERCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.*   WUAMICESECURITY SERVICES*   MHBOUND/1*   MHBOUND/2SECRET
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 71]
- 68 -The following entities were sold during the referenced period:
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 72]
69ENTITIES SOLDAIR SUPPORTWUSHINE/WUCOMETWUSHINE/WUELBOWWUSHINE/WUNOTICEWUSHINE/WUPUMAWUGAZELLE/WUBLOWGUNWUGAZELLE/WUZEBUZRCREST/ZRAVASTZRCREST/ZRCLIFFWUCLOAK/WUDUSTERWUCLOAK/WUHARPYWUCLOAK/WUVITAL* IUQUEST/IUABATE* IUQUEST/IUPAGAN  WUSAXA/WUACUTETRAVEL BUSINESSWUBEVYCOVER SUPPORTPOEARLYCALANCETSTFANWEED/STDOLLARSTMYSTICMIHELENMIPACT/MICOUNCILINSURANCEMHTHROWΜΗΜΑΤΤΕMHIRONYRECEIVED FROMDEC 17* Substantial Assets Sold; Entities DissolvedTAB B
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 73]
SECRET - 70 -TAB BENTITIES SOLDAIR SUPPORTJBGREED/JBARGONFOUNDATION OR INSTITUTEDEINDEED/IUINHAULTRAVEL SERVICELPJACKLOW COST HOUSINGWUFLOWER/WUSWAMP.RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENTHTNAMABLESECRETRECEIVED FROMDEC 10 1975
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 74]
- 71 -The following entities were "otherwise disposed of" during the referenced period:
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 75]
72 -ENTITIES OTHERWISE DISPOSED OFAIR SUPPORTWUEMBARK/WUHALFLINWUSTAKE/WUHOBBYWUSAXA/WUBLUSEEMOMARRONWULAZYCOVER SUPPORTYJPASTISFOUNDATIONS OR INSTITUTESQRBENDZROCCUR/ZRMIDDYQRSENSE/KMOCHRIODAESILVERMEDIAPAWALRUSPOVARSITYQRGLADAEEGGHEADACCOUNTING & MANAGEMENTLPCAPTAIN/LPCANALOPERATIONAL SUPPORTLADYCHAPELWUTACTIC/WUDOLLOPTAB C
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 76]
- 73 -SECRETTAB CENTITIES OTHERWISE DISPOSED OFMEDIA AND/OR PUBLICATIONLILISP/GAMHIMQKACTIVEQRMASTERTPTONICTPTONIC/FJINDULGETPTONIC/ZRNACARATFOUNDATION OR INSTITUTEZRCANNYDTHABEASDTEMBARGOZRTINDERQRTROWPAFANFAREQKFEARFULWSFLUFFERDTPILLERDTLAMPREYQKOPERA/DTGODOWNCOVER SUPPORTQRMUGWUMPTRAVEL SERVICETGVIVIDOPERATIONAL SUPPORTAMOTRECEIVED FROMDEC 10 1975SIASECRET
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 77]
There follows a description of the disposition of entities sold or otherwise disposed of during the referenced period. Twenty-nine (29) of the entities were sold or given to witting individuals (former officers, employees, managers, contractors, etc.) Five (5) were sold or given to witting individuals who had no formal relationship with the proprietary. Ten (10) proprietaries continued to provide goods or services to the Agency after the disposal. Thirty-four (34) proprietaries did not continue to provide goods or services to the Agency after disposal. In nine (9) instances the provision or offer to provide goods or services were formal or informal conditions of the sale or gift. In thirty-seven (37) instances this was not the case. Six (6) proprietaries were sold to unwitting individuals or organizations and thus no provision for services or goods was indicated. Several miscellaneous dispositions developed which did not fit neatly into any of the above categories. For example, there was one merger of an Agency proprietary with another Agency proprietary. In two instances the Agency retained a non-proprietary relationship with a former employee. On two occasions the Agency turned over proprietaries to other government departments and on one occasion it sold a proprietary to another government department. There were several instances where the Agency gave the assets of a proprietary after liquidation (books, materials, etc.) to previously uncompensated participants in the various ventures. On occasion, the corporate shells were given to attorneys in lieu of fees for dissolution. Some participants were permitted to retain proceeds of sales in order to continue the original effort of the particular proprietary. And
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 78]
- 72 -finally, assets were sometimes given to other proprietaries but without the benefit of a merger.
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 79]
TAB DDISPOSITION OF ENTITIES SOLD OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF:WUSHINE/WUGAZELLEThe six air proprietaries in the WUSHINE and WUGAZELLE complexes were sold as a package in 1969 to a group of witting U.S. businessmen who had acted as nominee officers, directors, and stock- holders for the companies in the WUSHINE complex. Although the group offered to provide cover and/ or air support to the Agency after the sale, this offer was not made a condition of the sale, and no understanding or contract was negotiated for prospective purchase of goods or services or cover support. To date, the proprietaries sold have not been used by the Agency.ZRCRESTThese two air proprietary entities were sold in 1974 to the businessman who managed both entities during the period of Agency ownership. No agree- ments for the continued use of the entities sold were negotiated or implied at the time of sale, and, to date, no subsequent use has been made of the entities by the Agency.WUCLOAK/WUDUSTERThis air proprietary was sold in 1968 to the witting businessman who managed the entity during the period of Agency ownership. No agreement for the continued use of the entity sold was negotiated or implied at the time of sale, and, to date, no subsequent use has been made of the entity by the Agency.WUHARPYThis air proprietary (parts procurement) was sold in 1965 after all assets had been removed (a corporate shell) to the witting group of businessmen from which the entity was originally purchased. No agreement for the continued use of the entity sold was negotiated or implied at the time of sale, and, to date, no subsequent use has been made of the entity by the Agency.WUCLOAK/WUVITALThis air proprietary entity was sold in 1972 to an unwitting, bona fide airline company. No agreement for the continued use of the entity was negotiated or implied at the time of sale, and, to date, no subsequent use has been made of the entity by the Agency.
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 80]
## TAB DPage 2IUQUEST/IUABATE/IUPAGAN - Substantial assets of these two IUQUEST air proprietary entities were sold in 1975 to a bona fide aviation company which was made witting for purposes of the sale. No agreement was nego- tiated or implied at the time of sale for Agency use or purchase of goods or services from the company which purchased the assets. To date, no goods or services have been purchased from the buyer. The entities were subsequently liquidated.WUSAXA/WUACUTE - This air proprietary entity was sold in 1971 to an unwitting businessman. No agreement for con- tinued use of the entity by the Agency was negoti- ated or implied at the time of sale, and, to date, no such use has been made of the entity.WUBEVY - This proprietary, which published travel guides and was used as cover for Agency officers world- wide, was sold in 1968 to the editor of the travel guides. The editor was an Agency employee and retired at the time of the sale. No agree- ment was negotiated or implied for the continuing use of the entity after sale. To date, no goods or services have been purchased from the entity by the Agency.POEARLY - This proprietary entity, which provided status and access cover for several case officers in the Far East, was sold in 1975 to unwitting purchasers.. There have been no Agency contacts with the purchaser since then. All sale pro- ceeds were returned to the Agency.CALANCET - This proprietary, which provided cover support in Europe, was sold in 1965 to a witting, bona fide company which provided technical assistance and marketing support to the proprietary during the period of Agency ownership. No agreement was negotiated or implied for prospective use of the entity by the Agency, and no such use was made by the Agency. The bona fide company, did, however, continue to provide cover for Agency officers in other areas and under offices not related to the former proprietary's business activities.STFANWEED/STDOLLAR - This proprietary was an import-export firm which provided cover for one Agency employee in the Far East. The entity was sold to the Agency employee in 1966 at the time of his retirement from the Agency. No agreement was negotiated
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 81]
SEOUT 78TAB DPage 3STFANWEED/STDOLLAR(continued)or implied at the time of sale for the Agency'spurchase of goods or services, and, to date,no such use has been made of the entity.STYMYSTICThis small proprietary, which provided cover forone Agency employee in the Far East, was liqui-dated in 1974. A covert relationship has con-tinued with the owner of the parent company ofwhich the Agency proprietary was a subsidiary.The owner provides cover in the parent companyfor another Agency employee, and the parentcompany moved into the premises vacated by thesubsidiary and was allowed to take over fixturesand a rental deposit at no cost.MIHELENThis proprietary, which provided cover for oneAgency case officer in the Far East, was soldin 1974 to two local-hire employees of the firm.All Agency connections with the firm were severedat the time of sale.MIPACT/MICOUNCILThis proprietary, which provided cover for oneAgency employee, was sold in 1970 to the un-witting members of its Board of Directors.At the time of sale all Agency connectionswith the entity were severed.MHTHROWThis proprietary (part of the insurance complex)was formed for the purpose of purchasing anapartment overseas which was used for operationalpurposes. When the apartment was no longer ofoperational use in 1970, the company (and theapartment) was sold to a non-Agency connectedparty. No agreement for the continued use ofthe corporation or the apartment was made withthe purchaser, and, to date, no such use hasbeen made of the entity or the apartment.ΜΗΜΑΤΤΕThis proprietary (part of the insurance complex)was established to purchase an apartment overseasof operational interest to the Agency. When theapartment was no longer needed for operationalpurposes in 1970, the corporation (and theapartment) was sold to a non-Agency connectedparty. No agreement for the continued use ofthe apartment or the entity was made with thepurchaser, and, to date, no such use has been madeof the apartment or the entity.SECRET5
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 82]
79TAB DPage 4MHIRONYThis proprietary was established for the use of the insurance complex, but it was never activated. The corporate shell was sold in 1974 to the unwitting attornies who served as resident agents. No agreement was made with the purchaser for the continued use of the entity, and, to date, no such use has been made of the entity.WUEMBARK/WUHALFINThis air proprietary was merged with another air proprietary (ZRCLIFF) in 1968.WUSTAKE/WUHOBBYThis air proprietary was sold to the businessman who managed the proprietary during the period of Agency ownership on the condition that the Agency would buy back the proprietary if the contract which sustained the proprietary was not renewed by USAID. The USAID contract was not renewed, and the businessman dissolved the entity on behalf of the Agency in 1968.WUSAXA/WUBLUSEEThis air proprietary was disposed of by transferring all assets to another air proprietary and turning over the corporate shell to two unwitting foreign national nominees. No agreement with the nominees for the purchase of goods or services subsequent to the turn over was negotiated or implied, and, to date, no use has been made of the entity by the Agency.MOMARRONThis proprietary was established in the Far East by two foreign agents of the Agency to provide support services for Agency-sponsored air operations. The company failed, at least partly due to embezzlement by the two agents, and was liquidated apparently in late 1962 or early 1963. The Agency station in the country involved continued to maintain a covert relationship with the two agents who were politically significant for some time after the liquidation. The relationship was non-proprietary.MULAZYThis proprietary was involved in support of air activities for a large Agency paramilitary program in Africa. At such time as the program was concluded, all assets were removed from the company, and the corporate shell was given to the attorney who established the entity in lieu of paying his prospective fee for dissolving the corporation.
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 83]
# REGRET## TAB D## Page 5YJPASTISThis proprietary, which provided cover support for one Agency officer in the Far East, was abandoned when the country was overrun by Communist forces. The assets left behind will be written off.QRBENDThis proprietary, non-profit organization was turned over to its management in 1967 when the Agency withdrew its support to the entity. No further Agency support has been given to the entity, and the management intended to continue the program with private and USAID support.ZROCCUR/ZRMIDDYThis proprietary non-profit, medical organization was disposed of in 1967 by transfer of all of its assets to the witting Board of Directors for continuation without Agency support. No further Agency support was given to the entity.QRSENSE/KMOCHRIODThis proprietary, non-profit entity was disposed of in 1968 when all assets were turned over to the witting trustees who intended to continue the operation with private support. No further support was given to the entity by the Agency.AESILVERThis foreign proprietary research institute was disposed of in 1967, at which time the Institute was surge funded to permit it to continue operations for approximately two years while a search was made for private funds to enable continuation of the Institute or permit its orderly liquidation. In mid-1969, the Institute ceased its activity since sufficient private funds could not be located to fund Institute programs. No Agency support was provided after 1967.PAWALRUSThis proprietary entity published an English language periodical in the Near East. The publishing rights plus certain assets were sold to indigenous purchasers and the proceeds of sale were used to pay off corporate liabilities prior to dissolution of the entity. Since the periodical continued to publish articles which coincided with U.S. objectives for the area concerned, the Agency provided limited support to the new owners to enable them to continue the publication.
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 84]
- 81TAB DPage 6POVARSITYThis proprietary publishing firm in the FarEast provided cover support for one Agencyemployee who introduced foreign books and articlesto Far Eastern media sources. In 1975 the firmwas de-registered and certain assets were soldto a former employee of the firm who re-registeredthe firm under a different name. The Agencyemployee who was provided cover by the entity isstill active in the Far East under a new coverand the only contact with the purchaser is inthe interest of maintaining the cover story ofthe active Agency employee. No support isbeing extended to the re-registered entity.QRGLADThis activity provides support to a foreignbased asset to permit him to publish a foreignlanguage journal. The activity was inaccuratelyand inappropriately categorized as a proprietarywhen an Administrative Plan was prepared in 1971.The error was corrected in 1975 when the activitywas accurately categorized as a controlled sub-sidy. The operation continues with Agencysubsidy support.AEEGGHEADThe U.S. proprietary portion of this book pub-lishing activity was legally liquidated in1968. Funds remaining after settlement of allliabilities were transferred overseas to otherparts of the operation and were used to meetapproved operational expenses. Some of theremaining stock of foreign language books wasgiven to a cleared and witting contact who hadserved without compensation as an officer ofthe proprietary mechanism. The remainder wasshipped overseas to be distributed by theoverseas mechanisms of the operation which arenot proprietaries. They continue to distributebooks with Agency subsidy support.LPCAPTAIN/LPCANALThis proprietary, which provided management andaccounting services for Agency activities inEurope, was disposed of in 1974 by removal ofall assets from the entity and transfer of thecorporate shell to the U.S. businessman who hadbackstopped the company without compensation.No support has been given to the entity or usemade thereof by the Agency.
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 85]
- 82 -TAB DPage 7LADYCHAPELThis proprietary was established to purchase an apartment building in Europe for Agency office and residential use. In 1968, then the building was of no further use to the Agency, the entity with the apartment building was ostensibly given to the Department of State as a gift. The Department actually reimbursed the Agency for the building in Washington. The Agency, on behalf of the Department, is attempting to liquidate the company. This is complicated by a disputed foreign tax claim.WUTACTIC/WUDOLLOPThis operational support mechanism had no assets at the time of its disposal in 1971, and the corporate shell was turned over to the attorney who established the company in lieu of payment of his prospective fee for dissolving the entity.
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 86]
# SECRETTAB D## Disposition of Entities Sold or Otherwise Disposed OfJBARGONThis air support proprietary (maintenance facility) was sold in January 1975 to a bona fide aviation concern which was made witting of the Agency's ownership of the firm for purposes of the sale. At the time of sale, it was agreed that JBARGON would continue to provide aircraft maintenance, supply, and bookkeeping services to JBCHOKE, the former parent company of JBARGON. Since the date of sale, JBARGON has provided $612,000 worth of aircraft maintenance, supply, and bookkeeping services to JBCHOKE; JBCHOKE is now in the process of liquidation.DEINHAULThis proprietary lending institution (bank) was established in a European country in 1955 to provide loans and outright grants to non-communist cooperatives. The proprietary was ostensibly owned (backstopped) by a bona fide U.S. foundation which was subsidized by the Agency, and the bank was managed by a bona fide management company on behalf of the Agency. By 1962 when it was determined that the bank had accomplished its purposes, the Special Group (predecessor to the 40 Committee) instructed that the bank be phased out in an orderly manner over the next five years. Various disposal plans were considered over the next few years, and in 1965 the Agency sold the bank (through its ostensible owner--the foundation) to the firm which managed the bank during the period of Agency ownership. In payment, the foundation accepted notes from the management firm, payable over a four year period. It was expected that the payments of the purchase price would come from the proceeds derived from the repayment of various types of loans made by the bank, and it was recognized that certain unsecured bank loans were of questionable collectibility. Accordingly, that portion of the purchase price which was tied to the repayment of these loans was subject to adjustment for litigation expenses associated with collection and a 20% collection fee. Also, this portion of the purchase price was not subject to interest on the unpaid balance. It was also agreed that the bank would administer a fund of $100,000 set aside by the Agency for continuing grants in less than $25,000 amounts for Agency approved activities which wereSECRET7
[157-10014-10144.pdf — page 87]
SECRET - 84DEINHAUL (Cont'd) - in concert with the original objectives of the pro- ject.. In 1967 under the terms of the Katzenbach Report, it was necessary for the Agency to discon- tinue its support to the bona fide U.S. foundation (ostensible former owner of the bank as mentioned above) which had acted as a collection agent for the sale proceeds. Incident to the Agency's dis- engagement from support of the foundation, the foundation was allowed to keep all proceeds from subsequent payments on the purchase price for the bank.LPJACK - This travel service proprietary was sold in 1975 to an Agency employee at the time of his retirement. This individual had ostensibly owned the firm but in fact only managed it for the Agency. No agree- ment was negotiated for the continued use of the travel service by the Agency, however, the Agency was using the travel service at the time of sale largely for the purchase of airline tickets for travel in support of sensitive projects. This practice still continues, and it is estimated that Agency business represents about 30% of the gross airline ticket sales of the entity on an annual basis.WUSWAMP - The Agency owned 50% of the equity in this foreign entity which constructed low cost housing in one of the less developed countries of the world. The Agency's equity was sold to WUPESKY, a private company which provided cover for an Agency employee who managed the Agency's foreign low cost housing program. No agreement was made with WUPESKY for the subsequent purchase of services or products of WUSWAMP, and no such purchases were made. Nevertheless, WUPESKY continued to provide cover for the Agency Employee until 1973.HTNAMABLE - This proprietary was a non-profit organization which undertook high risk scientific research programs in support of Government sponsored reconnaissance programs. In 1966, the Agency decided to terminate its proprietary relationship with the entity and it was determined that, because of the charter of non-profit organizations, any proceeds from the liquidation would have to be given to other non-profit organizations or foundations. Accordingly, the plant and equipment were sold to a profit making corporation which created a subsidiary around the assets purchased. The proceeds of the sale were distributed among2SECRET