Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 137]
# U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIESRE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR JOHN P. MOHR BY SSC STAFF MEMBERSMr. Mohr was also questioned about the procedures he followed in securing Mr. J. Edgar Hoover's office after Mr. Hoover's death. Mr. Mohr told the Staff Members that the article which appeared in "The Washington Star" by columnist Jeremiah O'Leary was an accurate recording of what took place following Mr. Hoover's death. The Staff Members requested Mr. Mohr review in considerable detail exactly that he did to secure Mr. Hoover's office following his death.The question of former Associate Director Clyde Tolson's will was also raised by Staff Members. Mr. Mohr advised the interviewers that Hillory Tolson, brother of Clyde Tolson, had not decided at that time whether he was going to contest the will.Mr. Mohr was also asked about the whereabouts of Miss Helen Gandy, former Executive Assistant to Mr. Hoover. He advised that he did know her whereabouts and telephone number but promised he would not reveal them to anyone. Mr. Mohr was asked whether Miss Gandy would agree to being interviewed by Staff Members of the SSC. He advised that he would attempt to persuade Miss Gandy to agree to being interviewed on the condition he be allowed to be present during the entire interview. The Staff Members interposed no objection to that arrangement and Mr. Mohr indicated that he would advise Mr. Citrenstein of Miss Gandy's desires under the conditions stipulated above.On May 12, 1973, Mr. Mohr telephonically advised that he recalled some additional topics covered during the interview of May 9, 1973, which he desired to furnish to the FBI. Specifically, Mr. Mohr recalled that he was asked if he knew who prepared the "surreptitious letters" the Bureau had mailed in the Socialist Workers Party case. Mr. Mohr advised the Staff Members that he did not know but presumed those letters were prepared in the Document Section of the FBI Laboratory.
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 138]
# U. S. GATE SELECT CONTENT OF HALILISEL.CO ACTIVITESRE: ETERNID OF FONER ASSISTANT TO THE DEN STOR 2.Mr. Kohr also recalled that during his interview of May 9, 1975, ha had adviced Miss Candy had turned over to Dr. Mart Volt of the FBI the official and confidential filco of Mr. Hoover which amounted to one-half a file drover. Subsequently, Ir. Mohr learned fron Miss Ganty that the official an. confidential files turned over to Ir. Felt arounted to one and one-half file dravers. This information was subsequently furnished to Ir. Gitenstein by Mr. Nobr. On that occasion, I. Gitenstein astei Dr. Wabe whether an tienizal list of the official and confidential files nas cade and if so there the list mas. lohe told Gitenstein that he vas same a list as race and that in all probability the list accompanied the official and confidential files turned over to ir. Folt by iisc Concy.In addition to the above, Dr. Flohr on May 12, 1975, recalled that Gitenstein acked about a requirement of cll Purcou employees to turn over any confidential files in their possession ordered by It. Icover folloring the revelation that forcer Assistent to the Dizoctor William C. Sullivan had turned over cortain confidential files to former Assistant Attorney General Hardian, lobe adviced Giterstein that Mr. Hoover had in fact levica such a requirement on Eureau officials and that ull confidential files were to be turned over to Mr. Folt along with a nonoranden explaining the nature of these files. Citonotoin aoked ibhe where those memoranda vould be filed. Vohr responded by saying he presured they were confidential camoranda and would have gone with the confidential files turned over to Mr. Felt by Lureau officials maintaining such files.NOTE: The original and one copy of this LHM is being furnished to the Attorney General. The copy is to be forwarded by the Attorncy General to Mr. James A. Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the President. The information herein vas taken from στο memoranda, Cregar to Wannall, dated 5/9 and 12/75 entitled "Senstudy 75."3NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 139
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 139]
June 2, 1975 1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar# ORAL INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE SENATE## SELECT COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING### INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)1.  SUBJECT: FBI mail flow procedures and other miscellaneous matters.2.  WITNESS' ORGANIZATION: Retired Special Agent, FBI3.  FILE REFERENCE NO.: 62-1163954.  DATE OF INTERVIEW: 5/9/755.  INTERVIEWERS: SSC Staff Members Mark Gitenstein, Lester B. Seidel, and Thomas Dawson.6.  CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION: Unclassified7.  SUMMARY OF CONTENT: The witness was questioned and furnished information concerning procedures relating to the flow of mail at FBI Headquarters and other miscellaneous matters such as the difference between an SAC Letter and a letter to all SACS.8.  RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: None62-116395SFP:ekwNOTE: Original via liaison to Central Community Index in connection with Senstudy 75.![GPO 951-345]
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 140]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO: Mr. J. B. AdamsDATE: 5-29-75FROM: Legal CounselSUBJECT SENSTUDY 75Deputy Assistant Attorney General, K. William O'Connor requested on 5-28-75, that he be given the opportunity to review summaries of the five recently uncovered COINTELPRO programs. O'Connor stated that in view of captioned Committee's request concerning COINTELPRO and his position of being in charge of Bureau and Departmental responses to Committee requests, he felt that it would be advantageous for him to be generally aware of the contents of the five newly uncovered programs. Mr. O'Connor stated he had previously reviewed the other COINTELPRO programs. [while in Civil Rignts Division]RECOMMENDATION:That Mr. O'Connor be allowed to review the five recently uncovered COINTELPRO programs.1 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. Cregar1 - Mr. Ryan1 - Mr. Mintz1 - Mr. Hotis1 - Mr. DalyPVD:eek(8)
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 141]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO : Mr. W. R. WannallFROM : W. OcregarSUBJECT : SENSTUDY - 751 - Mr. J. B. Adams1- Mr. T. J. JenkinsDATE: 5/22/751 Mr. J. A. Mintz1 Mr. W. R. Wannall1 - Mr. W. O. CregarReference is made to my memorandum dated 5/19/75 advising of the receipt of a letter from the Senate Select Committee (SSC) to the Attorney General dated 5/14/75, appending requests for additional documents and other information.Specific attention is invited to Appendix A, item number 5, which requests:"All Memoranda of the FBI and the Justice Department discussing the legal authority of the FBI to use the following techniques to (1) investigate internal security matters, (2) collect intelligence information, and (3) engage in counter- intelligence activities (see letter from the Chief Counsel to the Deputy Attorney General dated April 23, 1975):a. All forms of electronic surveillance, including consensual electronic surveillance;b. All forms of mail surveillance, including mail covers and opening mail> [Figure: Document with stamp and handwritten annotations]c. Surreptitious entry;d. All forms of physical surveillance, including agent infiltration, observation, photography, and remote viewing and sensing devices;e. Informants, including possible entrapment, provo- cation, interference with lawyer-client relation- ship, or other problems;f. Obtaining bank, credit, or other personal informa- tion;g. Incommunicado interrogation;62-116395CONTINUED - OVER
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 142]
Memorandum to Mr. W. R. WannallRe: SENSTUDY - 7562-116395h. Maintenance of files and records;i. Dissemination of information from files and records;j. So-called "COINTELPRO" techniques and methods, including all forms of organizational 'disruption.'"Appendix B, item number 4, requests:"For each of the techniques described in Item 5 of Appendix A above, all memoranda and other materials relating to:a. The original decision to utilize the technique in internal security, intelligence collection, and/or counterintelligence matters, operations, or activities.b. The policies and procedures of the FBI for the utilization of the technique in internal security, intelligence collection, and/or counterintelligence matters, operations, or activities."It would appear appropriate that response to Appendix A, item number 5, be prepared by the Legal Counsel Division. It is also apparent that response to Appendix B, item number 4, should be closely coordinated although responsibility for research in this area would appear to fall more logically within the Intelligence Division.RECOMMENDATIONS:1. That Legal Counsel Division assume responsibility for preparing response contained in Appendix A, Item number 5.
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 143]
Memorandum to Mr. W. R. WannallRe: SENSTUDY - 7562-116395RECOMMENDATIONS - CONTINUED:2. Intelligence Division will assume responsibility   for preparing response to item number 4, Appendix B, with input   from the Legal Counsel Division.- 3 -  NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 144
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 144]
2 - Mr. S. F. PhillipsJune 3, 1975MATERIAL FOR SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES1. TITLE/SUBJECT: Legal Authorities of the FBI2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM)   and its enclosures described below.4. DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Some of the enclosures to   the LHM classified "Top Secret."5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: Should have6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: The LHM refers to a prior LHM   furnished to the SSC enclosing a copy of "Intelligence División   Position Paper on Jurisdiction" dated 2/13/75 and noted that   certain exhibits were extracted prior to dissemination due to   Third Agency Rule considerations. LHM advised that those   considerations had been resolved and that the exhibits were   being furnished with the LHM.7. REQUESTOR/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 3/19/75. Response   pertains to Part I of the SSC original letter of request dated   3/19/75.8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5/20/7510. LOCATION OF FILE COPY: FBI file 62-11639511. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: Third    Agency Rule clearances obtained.Assoc. Dir.Dep. AD Adm.Dep. AD Inv.Asst. Dir.:Admin.Comp. Syst.Ext. Affairs 62-116395Files & Com. SFP:ekwIdent.Inspection -NOTE: Original via liaison to Central Community Index inIntell. connection with Senstudy 75.LaboratoryPlan. & Eval.Spec. Inv.Traininggal Coun.Jephone Rm.Vector Sec'y
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 145]
# The Attorney GeneralDirector, FBI1 - Mr. R. E. Gebhardt(A n: J. W. Hines)2 - Legal Counsel Division(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar1 - Mr. K. A. MendenhallMay 29, 1975ALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1-19-01 BY BRAZILUNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEEON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIESReference is made to a letter from the Senate Select Committee dated May 14, 1975, with attached appendices A thru D requesting certain documents and other information.Under item 26 of Appendix C, a request is made for "All reports prepared by the Office of Criminal Justice of the Department of Justice pursuant to the request in September 1974 of the Attorney General and/or Deputy Attorney General pertaining to the so-called 'Wounded Knee' case and any other so-called 'political trial' or other prosecutions brought by the Special Litigation Section of the Internal Security Division."Under item 27 of Appendix C request is made of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for "All memoranda or other materials prepared by the FBI relating to the reports described in Item 26."The Department is requested to advise this Bureau if reports which are requested in Appendix C under item 26 with respect to the "Wounded Knee' case" were furnished to the FBI. If such reports were furnished please advise under what captions and dates these reports were submitted and identify by captions and dates all FBI communications on which your reports were based. If these reports were not furnished this Bureau please provide copies to us when you identify the FBI communications as requested herein.REC-10062-116395-188You are also requested to provide to this Bureau copies of those reports, including sufficient information identifying FBI communications on which they were based, which will be furnished the Senate Select Committee per its request for "any other so-called 'political trial' or other prosecution brought by the Special Litigation Section of the Internal Security Division."62-116395KAM:cmc1975NW-88296 DocId:32989588 Page 146SEE NOTE PAGE 2
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 146]
# The Attorney CeneralInasmuch as this Bureau's response to item 27 of Appendix C enclosed with referenced letter depends on your response to item 26, you are requested to furnish the desired information as soon as possible in order that we may comply with the Senate Select Committee roquest. Since all reports requested under item 26 were prepared by the Department this Bureau will take no action to provide copies of these reports to the Committee.1 - The Deputy Attorney GeneralAttention: K. William O'ConnorSpecial Counsel forIntelligence CoordinationNOTE:Until such time as we determine what information will be furnished the Senate Select Committee by the Department under item 26 mentioned above we believe our response on item 27 to the Senate Select Committee should be delayed. This will enable us to provide material requested by the Senate Select Committee which will correspond to information being provided by the Department.Trial material relating to Wounded-Knee case was handled by the General Investigative Division and this part of the request is being coordinated with SA J. C. Gordon who supervised the Wounded-Knee case. Upon receipt of requested information from the Department, General Investigative Division will be notified so an appropriate response may be compiled regarding Wounded-Knee matter. Intelligence Division will conduct necessary reviews for information pertaining to other prosecutions by "Special Litigation Section" of the Department.- 2 -NW 88296 DocId:32989588 Page 147
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 147]
MEMORANDUM FOR: Members of the USIB Ad Hoc Coordinating GroupSUBJECT: Certification of Clearances for ClassifiedInformation and Compartmented Informationof Staff Members of the Senate Select Committee1. Arrangements have been made so that the Compartmented   Information Branch (CIB) of CIA will maintain, as a matter of common   concern, an up-to-date listing of all staff members of the Senate   Select Committee who have been certified by the Committee for   access to classified information up to and including TOP SECRET   and also those who have been certified and briefed for compartmented   information.2. CIB will attempt to keep this listing in a current status   and telephone inquiries can be made by calling 351-5507 (IDS 143-5507)   during the hours 0800 to 1730 Monday through Friday. Periodically,   a current listing of the individuals certified will be disseminated to   members of the USIB Ad Hoc Group.3. It is contemplated this same procedure will be followed   for the House Select Committee when certification of clearances are   received from this Committee and you will be advised when such   procedure is instituted.John M. ClarkeAssociate Deputy to the DCIfor the Intelligence Community
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 148]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO: Mr. J. Adams DATE: 5/21/75FROM: Legal CounselSUBJECT: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEEAt approximately 9:00 a. m. on May 21, 1975, retired Special Agent Alan G. Sentinella appeared in my office prior to his appointment to receive a subpoena and to testify at 9:30 a.m. on 5/21/75 at Washington, D. C., before the Senate Select Committee. I told Mr. Sentinella that it would not be possible for me to furnish him personal counsel prior to or during his testimony, however I felt it was appropriate for me to furnish him certain information. I told Mr. Sentinella that he was entitled to be represented by a personal counsel of his own choice at any time and that if he chose to secure the services of a private attorney he was at liberty to do so.I also told Mr. Sentinella that under the rules of the Senate Select Committee (Rule 6.4), a witness may be accompanied by counsel during testimony and a witness who is unable to obtain counsel may inform the Committee of that fact and the Committee is obliged to endeavor to obtain voluntary counsel for the witness. I told him that the rules further provide that the failure to obtain counsel would not excuse him from appearing and testifying.I asked Mr. Sentinella whether he had been given any advice by the Committee concerning his right to counsel and whether he had received a copy of the Committee's rules as required by regulations in the rules (Rule 6.1). Mr. Sentinella said that he had not been so advised and he had not been given a copy of the rules by any representative of the Committee.I told Mr. Sentinella that as to matters other than the presence of personal counsel, no understanding had been reached with the Committee.1 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. Cregar1 - Mr. Hotis1 - Mr. MintzJAM:mfd (6)
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 149]
Memorandum to Mr. AdamsRe: Senate Select CommitteeI further explained to him that the Attorney General Order relating to responses to subpoenas would apply to him and that we had been advised that the Department had approved a waiver of the Attorney General Order limitation permitting his testimony, but only as to matters concerning Martin Luther King, Jr., and Stanley David Levison, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, including related matters. I told Mr. Sentinella that should the questioning involve other areas and he was in doubt as to his authorization to respond, he could request an opportunity to consult with the Department to secure approval for his testimony consistent with the terms of the Attorney General Order. I also reminded Mr Sentinella that a representative of the FBI would be available during his testimony for such consultation as he felt might be necessary. I told him that SA Paul Daly would be available for that purpose.I told Mr. Sentinella that our concern is not that matters of historical fact might be revealed, but that testimony which might be required of him could impair the Bureau's current efforts to discharge its responsibilities. I explained that in specific terms what this meant was that information that would identify sensitive sources, techniques or methods, or that would identify confidential informants, or would expose current investigative operations should be reserved for members of the Committee or perhaps the Chairman of the Committee depending upon the sensitivity of the particular information. I advised him that in the event such matters are involved in the questioning he could request consultation and that arrangements could be made for the answers to be supplied under appropriately limited conditions. I told Mr. Sentinella that as to other areas of possible testimony, the Bureau would impose no request that he decline to answer questions.Mr. Sentinella advised me that he understood the matters I had explained to him and that he did not at this time feel the need of personal counsel because he said that he did not regard the appearance as one in the nature of a grand jury appearance. I told Mr. Sentinella that he should be aware that his testimony would be given under oath and in the event he made a statement that was self-incriminatory, it could be used against him. I reminded him I was not advising him in order to deter him from furnishing testimony, but only telling him of the protections he has under the- 2 -CONTINUED - OVER
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 150]
Memorandum to Mr. AdamsRe: Senate Select CommitteeConstitution against self-incrimination. He said he would keep that matter in mind.Mr. Sentinella said that he would like to volunteer the results of his interview at the conclusion of the interview and he also would like to have an opportunity to review a transcript of the testimony for accuracy.RECOMMENDATION:For information.
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 151]
# FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION COMMUNICATIONS SECTIONNR 019 SF PLAINMAY 16 19757:09PM NITEL MAY 16, 1975 KEKTO: DIRECTOR (62-116395) (ATTN: OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL)FROM: SAN FRANCISCO (62-6887)SENSTUDY, 1975RE BUREAU NITEL TO ALL OFFICES MAY 2, 1975.ON MAY 16, 1975, FORMER SAN FRANCISCO SUPERVISOR DAVID E. TODD CALLED AND ADVISED HE HAD RECEIVED CALL FROM LESTER SEIDEL, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE, WANTING TO INTERVIEW TODD RE DOMESTIC COUNTERINTEL- LIGENCE OPERATIONS, SPECIFICALLY, BLACK PANTHER PARTY. TODD SAID HE WANTED TO BE COOPERATIVE BUT WAS APPREHENSIVE REGARDING DIVULGING INFORMATION AS A RESULT OF HIS FBI EMPLOYMENT. HE WAS INSTRUCTED TO IMMEDIATELY CALL COLLECT THE OFFICE OF THE LEGAL COUNSEL AT FBIHQ. HE SAID HE WOULD DO THIS.TODD ALSO ADVISED THAT SEIDEL HAD TOLD HIM THE COMMITTEE ALSO WANTED TO INTERVIEW FORMER SAN FRANCISCO SUPERVISOR ALBERT P. CLARK.ENDEX 104REC 6762-116395-18617 MAY 28 1975ALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1-19-01 BY SP2 ALM/RUCCNW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 152
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 152]
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCOMMUNICATIONS SECTIONMAY 29 1975TELETYPENR005 AX CODE3:20 AM U R G E N T MAY 29, 1975 DKLTO DIRECTOR (62-116395)FROM ALEXANDRIA (62-217) (RUC) 1 PAGESENSTUDY 75.REBUTEL TO ALEXANDRIA, MAY 28, 1975.ON MAY 29, 1975, FORMER EMPLOYEES COURTLAND J.JONES AND BERNARD A. WELLS WERE CONTACTED BY ASAC MICHAEL A. MORROW,IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUREAU INSTRUCTIONS, AND FURNISHED INFORMATION SET OUT IN REFERENCED TELETYPE.ENDHOLD![signature]![stamp indicating associated director, admin, inv, assist dir, etc...]
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 153]
NR 002 BA CODED7:49 PM NITEL 5/30/75 JANTO: DIRECTOR (62-116395)EROM: BALTIMORE (66-3127)SENSTRUDY 75FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCOMMUNICATIONS SECTIONMAY 3 0 1975TELETYPERE BUTEL MAY 28, 1975. Jer 178THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS WERE CONTACTED ON THE INDICATEDDATES BY THE ASAC AND INSTRUCTIONS INRETEL FOLLOWED.NONE OF THEM HAVE BEEN CONTACTED BY THE SENATE SELECTCOMMITTEE STAFF TO DATE, AND EACH STATED THEY WOULD CONTACT THEFBR SHOULD THEY BE CONTACTED IN THE FUTURE.MAY 29, 1975 - ROBERT H. HAYNES, 205 NORTHMOOR DRIVE,SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND.MAY 30, 1975 - ERNEST H. BELTER, 616 EDNOR ROAD, SILVERSPRING, MARYLAND.MAY 30, 1975 - STERLING B. DONAHOE, 2813 SPIRAL LANE,BOWIE, MARYLAND.END
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 154]
NR096 CG CODE727PM NITEL 5/30/75 FMMTO DIRECTOR (62-116395)FROM CHICAGOSENSTIDY 75.REBUTEL MAY 23, 1975.PURSUANT TO BUREAU INSTRUCTIONS, MISS OLGA CIFSA WAS CONTACTED EY SAC, CHICAGO, ON MAY 30, 1975 REGARDING CAPTIONED MATTER. SHE STATED SHE STILL RESIDES 10409 SOUTH INDIANA AVENUE, CHICAGO, AND IS STILL EMPLOYED AS AN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY AT THE FIRM OF ERNST AND FRUST, ATTORNEYS, IN CHICAGO.MISS CIESA WAS ADVISED THAT THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE HAD MADE INQUIRY AS TO HER LAST KNOWN ADDRESS, INDICATING THE POSSIBILITY THAT THEY MAY DESIRE TO INTERVIEW HER. CHE WAS FURTHER ADVISED THAT IN THE EVENT SHE IS INTERVIEWED AND DURING THE COURSE OF SAME ANY QUESTIONS WERE ASKED RELATIVE TO SENSITIVE BURFAU OPERATIONS; FTC., SHE COULD REQUEST THE ASSISTANCE OF AN AGENT TO BE PRESENT DURING THE INTERVIEW.
[124-10271-10003_multirif.pdf — page 155]
PAGE TWOSHE WAS FURTHER ADVISED THAT IF AFTER THE INTERVIEW THEREWERE ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH PRESENTED A QUESTION IN HERMIND SHE COULD CONTACT THE BURFA'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISIONIN WASHINGTON, D.C., COLLECT, FOR ANY ASSISTANCE THATDIVISION COULD AFFORD HER.MISS CIFSA WAS AT A LOSS TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE SENATESELECT COMMITTEE WOULD DESIRE TO INTERVIEW HER AND ADIVI CEDTHAT IN ALL PROBABILITY SHE WOULD ASY FOR THE ASSISTANCEOF AN AGENT PRIOR TO AUSIERING ANY QUESTIONS THEY MAY PROPOSETO HER. SHE WAS PARTICULARLY CONCERNED THAT SHE MIGHTINAD VERTENTLY DISCLOSE CONFIDENT IAL INFORMATION AND AS A RESILTWOL ULD FEELMUCH MORE SECURE WERE AN AGENT PRESENT TO ADVISEHER.IN THE EVENT CONTACT IS MADE THE BURFAN HILL RE ADVISE,ENDHOLDNW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 156