Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 139]
June 2, 19751 - Mr. J. A. Mintz1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips# ORAL INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE SENATE# SELECT COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING# INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)1.  SUBJECT: FBI mail flow procedures and other miscellaneous matters.2.  WITNESS' ORGANIZATION: Retired Special Agent, FBI3.  FILE REFERENCE NO.: 62-1163954.  DATE OF INTERVIEW: 5/9/755.  INTERVIEWERS: SSC Staff Members Mark Gitenstein, Lester B. Seidel, and Thomas Dawson.6.  CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION: Unclassified7.  SUMMARY OF CONTENT: The witness was questioned and furnished information concerning procedures relating to the flow of mail at FBI Headquarters and other miscellaneous matters such as the difference between an SAC Letter and a letter to all SACS.8.  RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: None62-116395SFP:ekwNOTE: Original via liaison to Central Community Index in connection with Senstudy 75.![document identifier] REC-100 62-116215-193![date] JUNE 1975![GPO identifier] GPO 951-345
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 140]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO: Mr. J. B. AdamsDATE: 5-29-75FROM: Legal CounselSUBJECT SENSTUDY 75Deputy Assistant Attorney General, K. William O'Connor requested on 5-28-75, that he be given the opportunity to review summaries of the five recently uncovered COINTELPRO programs. O'Connor stated that in view of captioned Committee's request concerning COINTELPRO and his position of being in charge of Bureau and Departmental responses to Committee requests, he felt that it would be advantageous for him to be generally aware, of the contents of the five newly uncovered programs. Mr. O'Connor stated he had previously reviewed the other COINTELPRO programs. [while in Civil Rights Division]RECOMMENDATION:That Mr. O'Connor be allowed to review the five recently uncovered COINTELPRO programs.1 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. Cregar1 - Mr. Ryan1 - Mr. Mintz1 - Mr. Hotis1 - Mr. DalyPVD:eek(8)![signature]![signature]![stamp with date of JUN 5 1975 and the word FIVE]
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 141]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO : Mr. W. R. WannallFROM : W. OcregarSUBJECT: SENSTUDY - 751 - Mr. J. B. Adams1- Mr. T. J. JenkinsDATE: 5/22/751 - Mr. J. A. Mintz1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall1 - Mr. W. O. CregarAssoc. Dir.Dep. AD Adm.Dep. AD Inv.Asst. Dir.:Admin.Comp. Syst.Ext. AffairsFiles & Com.Gen. Inv.Ident.Intel.LaboratoryPlan. & Eval.Spec. Inv.TrainingLegal Coun.Telephone Rm.Director Sec'yReference is made to my memorandum dated 5/19/75 advising of the receipt of a letter from the Senate Select Committee (SSC) to the Attorney General dated 5/14/75, appending requests for additional documents and other information.Specific attention is invited to Appendix A, item number 5, which requests:"All Memoranda of the FBI and the Justice Department discussing the legal authority of the FBI to use the following techniques to (1) investigate internal security matters, (2) collect intelligence information, and (3) engage in counter- intelligence activities (see letter from the Chief Counsel to the Deputy Attorney General dated April 23, 1975):a. All forms of electronic surveillance, including consensual electronic surveillance;b. All forms of mail surveillance, including mail covers and opening mail;c. Surreptitious entry;d. All forms of physical surveillance, including agent infiltration, observation, photography, and remote viewing and sensing devices;e. Informants, including possible entrapment, provo- cation, interference with lawyer-client relation- ship, or other problems;f. Obtaining bank, credit, or other personal informa- tion;g. Incommunicado interrogation;
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 142]
Memorandum to Mr. W. R. WannallRe: SENSTUDY - 7562-116395h. Maintenance of files and records;i. Dissemination of information from files and records;j. So-called "COINTELPRO" techniques and methods, including all forms of organizational 'disruption.'"Appendix B, item number 4, requests:"For each of the techniques described in Item 5 of Appendix A above, all memoranda and other materials relating to:a. The original decision to utilize the technique in internal security, intelligence collection, and/or counterintelligence matters, operations, or activities.b. The policies and procedures of the FBI for the utilization of the technique in internal security, intelligence collection, and/or counterintelligence matters, operations, or activities."It would appear appropriate that response to Appendix A, item number 5, be prepared by the Legal Counsel Division. It is also apparent that response to Appendix B, item number 4, should be closely coordinated although responsibility for research in this area would appear to fall more logically within the Intelligence Division.RECOMMENDATIONS:1. That Legal Counsel Division assume responsibility for preparing response contained in Appendix A, Item number 5.
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 143]
Memorandum to Mr. W. R. WannallRe: SENSTUDY - 7562-116395RECOMMENDATIONS - CONTINUED:2. Intelligence Division will assume responsibility   for preparing response to item number 4, Appendix B, with input   from the Legal Counsel Division.- 3 -NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 144
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 144]
2 - Mr. S. F. PhillipsJune 3, 1975MATERIAL FOR SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES1. TITLE/SUBJECT: Legal Authorities of the FBI2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM) and its enclosures described below.4. DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Some of the enclosures to the LHM classified "Top Secret."5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: Should have6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: The LHM refers to a prior LHM furnished to the SSC enclosing a copy of "Intelligence División Position Paper on Jurisdiction" dated 2/13/75 and noted that certain exhibits were extracted prior to dissemination due to Third Agency Rule considerations. LHM advised that those considerations had been resolved and that the exhibits were being furnished with the LHM.7. REQUESTOR/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 3/19/75. Response pertains to Part I of the SSC original letter of request dated 3/19/75.8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5/20/7510. LOCATION OF FILE COPY: FBI file 62-11639511. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: Third Agency Rule clearances obtained.Assoc. Dir.Dep. AD Adm.Dep. AD Inv.Asst. Dir.:Admin.Comp. Syst.Ext. Affairs 62-116395Files & ComIdent. - NOTE: Original via liaison to Central Community Index inInspectionIntell.Laboratory connection with Senstudy 75.Plan. & Eval.Spec. Inv.Traininggal Coun.Jephone Rm.Vector Sec'yMAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNITNW 88296 | Docla:32989588 Page 145GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 145]
# The Attorney GeneralDirector, FBI1 - Mr. R. E. Gebhardt(An: J. W. Hines)2 - Legal Counsel Division(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar1 - Mr. K. A. MendenhallMay 29, 1975![ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED DATE 1-19-01 BY SPZALIWPW]UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEEON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIESReference is made to a letter from the Senate Select Committee dated May 14, 1975, with attached appendices A thru D requesting certain documents and other information.Under item 26 of Appendix C, a request is made for "All reports prepared by the Office of Criminal Justice of the Department of Justice pursuant to the request in September 1974 of the Attorney General and/or Deputy Attorney General pertaining to the so-called 'Wounded Knee' case and any other so-called 'political trial' or other prosecutions brought by the Special Litigation Section of the Internal Security Division."Under item 27 of Appendix C request is made of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for "All memoranda or other materials prepared by the FBI relating to the reports described in Item 26."The Department is requested to advise this Bureau if reports which are requested in Appendix C under item 26 with respect to the "Wounded Knee' case" were furnished to the FBI. If such reports were furnished please advise under what captions and dates these reports were submitted and identify by captions and dates all FBI communications on which your reports were based. If these reports were not furnished this Bureau please provide copies to us when you identify the FBI communications as requested herein.REC-10062-116395-188You are also requested to provide to this Bureau copies of those reports, including sufficient information identifying FBI communications on which they were based, which will be furnished the Senate Select Committee per its request for "any other so-called 'political trial' or other prosecutions brought by the Special Litigation Section of the Internal Security Division."![Assoc. Dir. Dep. AD Adm. Dep. AD Inv. Asst. Dir.: Admin. Comp. Syst. Ext. Affairs Files & Com. Gen. Inv. Ident. Inspection Intell. Laboratory Plan. & Eval. Spec. Inv. Training Legal Coun. Telephone, Rm Director Sedly NW-88296 Docld:32989588 Page 146]62-116395KAM:cmc![1975(10) MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT SEE NOTE PAGE 2 GPO 954-546]
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 146]
# The Attorney CeneralInasmuch as this Bureau's response to item 27 of Appendix C enclosed with referenced letter depends on your response to item 26, you are requested to furnish the desired information as soon as possible in order that we may comply with the Senate Select Committee roquest. Since all reports requested under item 26 were prepared by the Department this Bureau will take no action to provide copies of these reports to the Committee.1 - The Deputy Attorney GeneralAttention: K. William O'ConnorSpecial Counsel forIntelligence CoordinationNOTE:Until such time as we determine what information will be furnished the Senate Select Committee by the Department under item 26 mentioned above we believe our response on item 27 to the Senate Select Committee should be delayed. This will enable us to provide material requested by the Senate Select Committee which will correspond to information being provided by the Department.Trial material relating to Wounded-Knee case was handled by the General Investigative Division and this part of the request is being coordinated with SA J. C. Gordon who supervised the Wounded-Knee case. Upon receipt of requested information from the Department, General Investigative Division will be notified so an appropriate response may be compiled regarding Wounded-Knee matter. Intelligence Division will conduct necessary reviews for information pertaining to other prosecutions by "Special Litigation Section" of the Department.
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 147]
MEMORANDUM FOR: Members of the USIB Ad Hoc Coordinating GroupSUBJECT: Certification of Clearances for ClassifiedInformation and Compartmented Informationof Staff Members of the Senate Select Committee1. Arrangements have been made so that the Compartmented   Information Branch (CIB) of CIA will maintain, as a matter of common   concern, an up-to-date listing of all staff members of the Senate   Select Committee who have been certified by the Committee for   access to classified information up to and including TOP SECRET   and also those who have been certified and briefed for compartmented   information.2. CIB will attempt to keep this listing in a current status   and telephone inquiries can be made by calling 351-5507 (IDS 143-5507)   during the hours 0800 to 1730 Monday through Friday. Periodically,   a current listing of the individuals certified will be disseminated to   members of the USIB Ad Hoc Group.3. It is contemplated this same procedure will be followed   for the House Select Committee when certification of clearances are   received from this Committee and you will be advised when such   procedure is instituted.John M. ClarkeAssociate Deputy to the DCIfor the Intelligence Community
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 148]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO : Mr. J. Adams DATE: 5/21/75FROM : Legal CounselSUBJECT: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEEAt approximately 9:00 a. m. on May 21, 1975, retired Special Agent Alan G. Sentinella appeared in my office prior to his appointment to receive a subpoena and to testify at 9:30 a.m. on 5/21/75 at Washington, D. C., before the Senate Select Committee. I told Mr. Sentinella that it would not be possible for me to furnish him personal counsel prior to or during his testimony, however I felt it was appropriate for me to furnish him certain information. I told Mr. Sentinella that he was entitled to be represented by a personal counsel of his own choice at any time and that if he chose to secure the services of a private attorney he was at liberty to do so.I also told Mr. Sentinella that under the rules of the Senate Select Committee (Rule 6.4), a witness may be accompanied by counsel during testimony and a witness who is unable to obtain counsel may inform the Committee of that fact and the Committee is obliged to endeavor to obtain voluntary counsel for the witness. I told him that the rules further provide that the failure to obtain counsel would not excuse him from appearing and testifying.I asked Mr. Sentinella whether he had been given any advice by the Committee concerning his right to counsel and whether he had received a copy of the Committee's rules as required by regulations in the rules (Rule 6.1). Mr. Sentinella said that he had not been so advised and he had not been given a copy of the rules by any representative of the Committee.I told Mr. Sentinella that as to matters other than the presence of personal counsel, no understanding had been reached with the Committee.1 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. Cregar1 - Mr. Hotis1 - Mr. MintzJAM:mfd (6)
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 149]
Memorandum to Mr. AdamsRe: Senate Select CommitteeI further explained to him that the Attorney General Order relating to responses to subpoenas would apply to him and that we had been advised that the Department had approved a waiver of the Attorney General Order limitation permitting his testimony, but only as to matters concerning Martin Luther King, Jr., and Stanley David Levison, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, including related matters. I told Mr. Sentinella that should the questioning involve other areas and he was in doubt as to his authorization to respond, he could request an opportunity to consult with the Department to secure approval for his testimony consistent with the terms of the Attorney General Order. I also reminded Mr Sentinella that a representative of the FBI would be available during his testimony for such consultation as he felt might be necessary. I told him that SA Paul Daly would be available for that purpose.I told Mr. Sentinella that our concern is not that matters of historical fact might be revealed, but that testimony which might be required of him could impair the Bureau's current efforts to discharge its responsibilities. I explained that in specific terms what this meant was that information that would identify sensitive sources, techniques or methods, or that would identify confidential informants, or would expose current investigative operations should be reserved for members of the Committee or perhaps the Chairman of the Committee depending upon the sensitivity of the particular information. I advised him that in the event such matters are involved in the questioning he could request consultation and that arrangements could be made for the answers to be supplied under appropriately limited conditions. I told Mr. Sentinella that as to other areas of possible testimony, the Bureau would impose no request that he decline to answer questions.Mr. Sentinella advised me that he understood the matters I had explained to him and that he did not at this time feel the need of personal counsel because he said that he did not regard the appearance as one in the nature of a grand jury appearance. I told Mr. Sentinella that he should be aware that his testimony would be given under oath and in the event he made a statement that was self-incriminatory, it could be used against him. I reminded him I was not advising him in order to deter him from furnishing testimony, but only telling him of the protections he has under the- 2 -CONTINUED - OVERNW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 150
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 150]
Memorandum to Mr. AdamsRe: Senate Select CommitteeConstitution against self-incrimination. He said he would keepthat matter in mind.Mr. Sentinella said that he would like to volunteer theresults of his interview at the conclusion of the interview and he alsowould like to have an opportunity to review a transcript of the testimonyfor accuracy.RECOMMENDATION:For information.
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 151]
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCOMMUNICATIONS SECTIONNR 019 SF PLAINMAY 16 19757:09PM NITEL MAY 16, 1975 KEKTO: DIRECTOR (62-116395) (ATTN: OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL)FROM: SAN FRANCISCO (62-6887)SENSTUDY, 1975RE BUREAU NITEL TO ALL OFFICES MAY 2, 1975.ON MAY 16, 1975, FORMER SAN FRANCISCO SUPERVISOR DAVID E. TODD CALLED AND ADVISED HE HAD RECEIVED CALL FROM LESTER SEIDEL, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE, WANTING TO INTERVIEW TODD RE DOMESTIC COUNTERINTEL- LIGENCE OPERATIONS, SPECIFICALLY, BLACK PANTHER PARTY. TODD SAID HE WANTED TO BE COOPERATIVE BUT WAS APPREHENSIVE REGARDING DIVULGING INFORMATION AS A RESULT OF HIS FBI EMPLOYMENT. HE WAS INSTRUCTED TO IMMEDIATELY CALL COLLECT THE OFFICE OF THE LEGAL COUNSEL AT FBIHQ. HE SAID HE WOULD DO THIS.TODD ALSO ADVISED THAT SEIDEL HAD TOLD HIM THE COMMITTEE ALSO WANTED TO INTERVIEW FORMER SAN FRANCISCO SUPERVISOR ALBERT P. CLARK.END
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 152]
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCOMMUNICATIONS SECTIONMAY 29 1975TELETYPENR005 AX CODE3:20 AM U R G E N T MAY 29, 1975 DKLTO DIRECTOR (62-116395)FROM ALEXANDRIA (62-217) (RUC) 1 PAGESENSTUDY 75.REBUTEL TO ALEXANDRIA, MAY 28, 1975.ON MAY 29, 1975, FORMER EMPLOYEES COURTLAND J.JONES AND BERNARD A. WELLS WERE CONTACTED BY ASAC MICHAEL A. MORROW,IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUREAU INSTRUCTIONS, AND FURNISHED INFORMATION SET OUT IN REFERENCED TELETYPE.ENDHOLDNW 88296 DocId:32989588 Page 153
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 153]
NR 002 BA CODED7:49 PM NITEL 5/30/75 JANTO: DIRECTOR (62-116395)FROM: BALTIMORE (66-3127)SENSTRUDY 75FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCOMMUNICATIONS SECTIONMAY 3 0 1975TELETYPERE BUTEL MAY 28, 1975. Ser 178THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS WERE CONTACTED ON THE INDICATEDDATES BY THE ASAC AND INSTRUCTIONS INRETEL FOLLOWED.NONE OF THEM HAVE BEEN CONTACTED BY THE SENATE SELECTCOMMITTEE STAFF TO DATE, AND EACH STATED THEY WOULD CONTACT THEFBR SHOULD THEY BE CONTACTED IN THE FUTURE.MAY 29, 1975 - ROBERT H. HAYNES, 205 NORTHMOOR DRIVE,SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND.MAY 30, 1975 - ERNEST H. BELTER, 616 EDNOR ROAD, SILVERSPRING, MARYLAND.MAY 30, 1975 - STERLING B. DONAHOE, 2813 SPIRAL LANE,BOWIE, MARYLAND.END
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 154]
NR 096 CG CODE727PM NITEL 5/30/75 FMMTO DIRECTOR (62-116395)FROM CHICAGOSENSTUDY 75.REBUTEL MAY 23, 1975.PURSUANT TO BUREAU INSTRUCTIONS, MISS OLGA CIFSA WAS CONTACTED EY SAC, CHICAGO, ON MAY 30, 1975 REGARDING CAPTIONED MATTER. SHE STATED SHE STILL RESIDES 13409 SOUTH INDIANA AVENUE, CHICAGO, AND IS STILL EMPLOYED AS AN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY AT THE FIRM OF ERNST AND FRUST, ATTORNEYS, IN CHICAGO.MISS CIESA WAS ADVISED THAT THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE HAD MADE INQUIRY AS TO HER LAST KNOWN ADDRESS, INDICATING THE POSSIBILITY THAT THEY MAY DESIRE TO INTERVIEW HER. SHE WAS FURTHER ADVISED THAT IN THE EVENT SHE IS INTERVIEWED AND DURING THE COURSE OF SAME ANY QUESTIONS WERE ASKED RELATIVE TO SENSITIVE BURFAU OPERATIONS; FTC., SHE COULD REQUEST THE ASSISTANCE OF AN AGENT TO BE PRESENT DURING THE INTERVIEW.![signature] ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED DATE 2-29-04 BY SP2AH/RW84 JUN 5 1975NW 88296 DocId:32989588 Page 155
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 155]
PAGE TWOSHE WAS FURTHER ADVISED THAT IF AFTER THE INTERVIEW THEREWERE ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH PRESENTED A QUESTION IN HERMIND SHE COULD CONTACT THE BURFA'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISIONIN WASHINGTON, D.C., COLLECT, FOR ANY ASSISTANCE THATDIVISION COULD AFFORD HER.MISS CIFSA WAS AT A LOSS TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE SENATESELECT COMMITTEE WOULD DESIRE TO INTERVIEW HER AND ADIVI CEDTHAT IN ALL PROBABILITY SHE WOULD ASY FOR THE ASSISTANCEOF AN AGENT PRIOR TO AUSIERING ANY QUESTIONS THEY MAY PROPOSETO HER. SHE WAS PARTICULARLY CONCERNED THAT SHE MIGHTINAD VERTENTLY DISCLOSE CONFIDENT IAL INFORMATION AND AS A RESILTWOL ULD FEELMUCH MORE SECURE WERE AN AGENT PRESENT TO ADVISEHER.IN THE EVENT CONTACT IS MADE THE BURFAN HILL RE ADVISE.ENDHOLDNW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 156
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 156]
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCOMMUNICATIONS SECTIONMAY 5/0 1975TELETYPEPROOS OM CODE5:33PM NITEL/5/30/75 SKHTO: DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116396)FROM: /OMAHA (62-3439) (P)SENSTUDY 75RE BUREAU NITEL, MAY 28, 1975. Ser. 178SA ROBERT L. TAGG, WHO IS CURRENTLY ON ACTIVE DUTYAND CURRENTLY ASSIGNED AS SENIOR RESIDENT AGENT, LINCOLN,NEBRASKA, RESIDENT AGENCY, ADVISED OF CONTENTS IN RETELETYPE. SHOULD SA TAGG BE CONTACTED BY THE SENATESELECT COMMITTEE, THE BUREAU WILL BE ADVISED IEDIA.![ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED. HERTINIS INCLASSIFI DATE 1-19-02 BY SPDA/ml/r]REC-100 62-116395-182117 JUN 4 1975![Reaves cc 67- (Tagg) PERS.REC. UNIT]8 4 JUNE 1975NW 88296 DocId:32989588 Page 157
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 157]
7PX CODE317PM MAY 30, 1975 URGENT WACTO: DIRECTORMINNEAPOLIS (PERSONAL ATTENTION) TELETYPEFROM: PHOENIX (02-2033) 3PREBUNITEL DATED MAY 20, 1975 AND PHOENIX TELCALL TUMINNEAPOLIS MAY 30, 1975.FOR INFORMATION OF HINNEAPOLIS FOLLOWING IS BEING SETINQUIRIES MADE OF BUREAU BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)CONCERNING A NUMBER OF PRESENT AND FORMER FBI EMPLOYEES,INCLUDING THEIR CURRENT WHEREABOUTS, SUGGESTS THEY WAY BEINTERVIEWED BY SSC STAFF, EXACT SUBJECT MATTERS FOR INTERVIEWSUNKNOWN. SET OUT BELOW ARE NAMES AND LAST KNOWN ADDRESSES OFFORMER BUREAU EMPLOYEES AND OFFICE OF ASSIGNMENTINCUPIDENTS, ALL OF WHOM SSC HAS INQUIRED ABONEACH OF THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES IS TO BE INMEDIATELYCONTACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE (SHE) MIGHT BE APPROACHED BY THEEND PAGE UNE
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 158]
PAGE TWOSSC STAFF, SUBJECT MATTER UNKNOWN. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THATIN THE EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEWED AND DURING THE COURSE OFSAME, QUESTIONS ARE ASKED WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAUOPERATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, THIRD AGENCY RULE,AND UNGUING INVESTIGATIONS), THEY MAY REQUEST THAT AN FOIAGENI DE PRESENT. BUREAU WILL PROVIDE AGENT ON REQUEST OFINTERVIEWEE. AS A PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEEMAY, AFTER BEING CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'SLEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION10 ASSISI NIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITYOF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZEDINAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TOINPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS DONE AS COOPERATIVE GESTURE AND TUSAFEGUARD SENSITIVE BUREAU INFORMATION. CONTACTS WITHTHESE FORMER EMPLOYEES TO BE HANDLED PERSONALLY BY SAC ORASAC. IN EVENT THIS NOT FEASIBLE FOR JUST CAUSE, TO БЕHANDLED BY A SENIOR SUPERVISOR.END PAGE TWO> NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 159
[124-10271-10299_multirif.pdf — page 159]
PAGE INRELPHOENIX: MILDRED E. RISK, 11030 113TH DRIVE,YOUNG TOWN, ARIZONAINVESTIGATION AT YOUNG TOWN, ARIZONA HAS DISCLOSED THATMILDRED E. RISK IS NOW RESIDING WITH HER SISTER, MRS.W.A. AILLS, TEN MILE LAKE, HACKENSACK, MINNESOTA, RR 2,TELEPHONE NUMBER 218-547-3048, AND WILL BE THERE UNTIL FALLOF THIS YEAR WHEN SHE WILL RETURN TO ARIZONA.II NNEAPOLIS HANDLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUREAUINSTRUCTIONS.END