Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 208]
Another was a conscientious objector to military service. A thirdhad contributed $5.000 to the National Committee to Abolish theHouse Committee on Un-American Activities. A speaker representingthe W.E.B. DuBois Club was identified as a Communist. The FBIcovered the meeting with an informant who reported practicallyverbatim the remarks of all the speakers, including the following:*   The Chairman of the Philadelphia Ethical Society*   A representative of the American Civil Liberties Union*   A representative of the United Electrical Workers*   A spokesman for the Young Americans for Freedom*   A member of the staff of the "Catholic Worker"*   A minister of the African Methodist Episcopal Church*   A minister of the Episcopal Church*   A representative of the Philadelphia Area Committee to    End the War in Vietnam*   A Professor of Industrial Economics at Columbia University*   A répresentative of the Inter-University Committee for    Debate on Foreign Policy*   A member of Women's Strike for Peace who had traveled to    North Vietnam*   A member of Women's International League for Peace and    Freedom who had visited South Vietnam*   A chaplin from Rutgers University*   A professor of political science from Villanova University*   Another member of Young Americans: for Freedom*   The former Charge d'Affaires in the South Vietnamese EmbassyThis informant's report was so extensive as to be the equivalent ofa tape rècording, although the FBI report does not indicate that theinformant was "wired." Another informant reported the remarks ofadditional participants.*   An official of the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy*   A minister of the church of the Brethren*   A Unitarian minister*   A representative of United World Federalists*   A member of Students for a Democratic Society*   A member of the Socialist Workers Party*   A spokesman for the W.E.B. DuBois ClubsThe report was prepared as a Letterhead Memorandum with fourteencopies for possible dissemination by the FBI to other ExecutiveBranch agencies. Copies were disseminated to military intelligence
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 209]
- 41 -agencies, the State Department, and the Internal Security andCivil Rights Divisions of the Justice Department. SAC, Philadelphiato the FBI Director, Re: Universities Committee on Problems ofWar and Peace, March 2, 1966 (classified)NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 210
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 210]
5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONWASHINGTON, D. C. 20535Addressee: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEELTR LHM Memo Report dated 2-26-76Caption of Document:U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)(2/19/76 review of report) concerningInformantsOriginating Office: FBIDelivered by:Date: 3/3/76Received by:Title: ATTORNEY - SScReturn this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBIALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BY SPALMKPENCLOSURE62. 116395-1447NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 211
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 211]
TO: Intelligence Community StaffATTN: Central IndexFROM: FBISUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term. If a document was made available for review but not transmitted, so note.)X DOCUMENT2. DATE PROVIDED   2/27/763. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)X SSCHSC4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer, interviewee, testifier and subject)Memorandum5. IN RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in response to formal request, other-wise state verbal request of (name), initiative, subpoena, etc.)NA6. CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION (enter U, C, S, TS or Codeword)U7. KEY WORDS (enter the appropriate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are used underline for emphasis)Operating proceduresInformation handling8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)Information regarding review of portion of proposed draft of SSC report pertaining to informants in domestic security field.62-116395ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75.SJM:1hb (4)![Treat as yellow text]NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 212
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 212]
# INSTRUCTIONS*   Type or print clearly in ink.*   Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.*   Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.*   "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the information.*   If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a copy of, the original abstract, with the change indicated.SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here, e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional pages may be attached if necessary.
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 213]
# 94TH CONGRESS# H. RES. 1073IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMARCH 4, 1976Mr. EDGAR Submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration# RESOLUTION1 Resolved, That the report of the Select Committee on2 Intelligence filed on January 29, 1976, and entitled "Report3 of the Investigations of the United States Intelligence Agen-4 cies and Activities" shall be printed as a House documentVALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BYNW 88326. Docld:32989603 Page 214
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 214]
94TH CONGRESS2D SESSIONH. RES. 1073# RESOLUTIONOrdering the printing of the report of the Select Committee on.Intelligence.By Mr. EDGARMARCH 4, 1976-Referred to the Committee on House Administration![photo of a page with some dark spots on edges]NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 215
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 215]
94TH CONGRESS2D SESSION# H. RES. 1074IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMARCH 4, 1976Mrs. FENWICK (for herself, Mr. FRENZEL, Mr. ANDERSON of Illinois, Mr. EDGAR,Mr. CONABLE, Mr. MCKINNEY, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. FINDLEY) submittedthe following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules# RESOLUTION1 Resolved, That the report of the Select Committee on2 Intelligence, filed on January 29, 1976, and entitled “Report3 of the Investigation of the United States Intelligence Agen-4 cies and Activities” shall be referred to the Committee on5 House Administration, and such committee shall follow the6 procedures agreed to between the Select Committee on7 Intelligence and the President (a summary of which appears8 beginning at page H289 of the daily edition of the Con-9 gressional Record for January 26, 1976) with respect to10 the disclosure of classified information transmitted to such11 select committee. After such procedures have been complied12 with, such report, as may be altered in accordance with13 such procedures, shall be printed as a House document.V![ALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BY SP2ALMKP]NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 216
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 216]
# 94TH CONGRESS# 2D SESSION H. RES. 1074# RESOLUTIONTo provide for the speedy printing and publica-tion of the report of the Select Committeeon Intelligence.By Mrs. FENWICK, Mr. FRENZEL, Mr. ANDERSONof Illinois, Mr. EDGAR, Mr. CONABLE, Mr.MCKINNEY, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. FINDLEYMARCH 4, 1976Referred to the Committee on Rules
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 217]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO : Mr. T. W. LeavittFROM : E. C. PetersonSUBJECT: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE REPORTON MAIL INTERCEPT PROGRAMS(copy 2/26/76memo attached)DATE: 3/5/761 - Mr. J. A. Mintz1 - Mr. T. W. Leavitt1 - Mr. E. C. Peterson1 - Mr. W. O. Gregar1 - Mr. J. W. JohnsonMemorandum sets forth the results of a review of the Senate Select Committee (SSC) report dealing with mail intercept programs.On 3/4/76, the report prepared by Mr. James Dick of the SSC Staff concerning the mail intercept programs operated by the CIA and the FBI was reviewed by SA James W. Johnson. The report was reviewed to determine if the changes set forth in the memorandum from W. A. Branigan to Mr. W. R. Wannall dated 2/26/76, had been done. The review indicated the revisions agreed to between Mr. James Dick, SSC, and Mr. James P. Lee, had been done.ACTION:For information.62-1163951 - 105-288406![signature]![text indicating unclassfied information]
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 218]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO:Jg. McLernonth 18thDATE: 3-11-76FROM: W.S. Bailey IWSBSUBJECT: SerstanlyThe attached H. Res 1073 3-4-76 has been received in the Records Section, appropriately initialed, and indicated for file. By use of instant transmittal memorandum, all necessary recording and indexing will be accomplished. It is to be noted this form is for internal use only within the Records Section, principally by the Routing Unit where bulky material not accompanied by memorandum is usually received.The enclosure, if bulky and not usually filed with other papers in file, may be detached but this action should be clearly noted under the word "Enclosure."Enc.> [Figure: ENCLOSURE Stamp]62-116395-NOT RECORDEDMAR 11 19765-TjmALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BY SPRAUMKP
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 219]
Mr. W. R. WannallJ. G. DeeganMARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.1 - Mr. J. I lams1 - Mr. J. Mintz1 - Mr. R. Gallagher(Attn: S. S. Peelman)1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall2/10/761 - Mr. J. G. Deegan1 - Mr. J. T. Aldhizer1 - Mr. S. F. PhillipsThis informative memorandum to advise of status of Departmental review of FBI files concerning Martin Luther King, Jr., and related matters.You will recall that, commencing 12/6/75, personnel of the Civil Rights Division reviewed portions of our files concerning King and related matters. The last date such review was conducted in 1975 was on 12/19/75. On 2/9/76, Criminal Section Chief Robert A. Murphy resumed review of the King file. He worked on this for less than four hours on that day and was to return the morning of 2/10/76 but had not returned as of the dictation of this memorandum at 3:00 p.m., 2/10/76.Murphy had been reviewing the King file to the exclusion of other files of interest. The King file is 94 sections in size and, as of 2/9/76, only about 25 sections had been reviewed. On that date, Murphy told Supervisor J. T. Aldhizer that, when he resumed the review the next day, he wanted to start with the portion of the file commencing 1/1/68. This would be Section 77, and thus Murphy would be skipping approximately 50 sections or a little over half of the file.Murphy has given no indication, and neither has there been an indication from any other Departmental source, as to the true status of the Department's overall review100-1066701 62-116395 (Senstudy 75)SFP:1hb(9)
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 220]
Memorandum to Mr. W. R. WannallRe: Martin Luther King, Jr.100-106670of this matter which reportedly was to lead to ajudgement by the Department as to whether or not theinvestigation of King's assassination should be reopened.ACTION:None. For information.NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 221- 2 -
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 221]
PLAINTEXTTO SACS SAN FRANCISCOWFOTELETYPE1 - Mr. Callahan1 - Mr. Adams1 - Mr. Gallagher NITEL1 - Mr. Cooke1 - Mr. Long1 - Mr. Mintz 2/27/761 - Mr. WannallFROM DIRECTOR, FBI 62-116 395-CHANGED, UNSUB, AKA, ROBERT LEE LEWIS; IMPERSONATION; 00: SF.TITLE CHANGED FROM SENSTUDY 75 TO DESIGNATE ROBERT LEELEWIS AS THE SUBJECT AND IMPERSONATION AS THE CHARACTER.RE SF NITEL TO THE DIRECTOR, FEBRUARY 23, 1976, CAPTIONED,"SENSTUDY 75."INQUIRY MADE BY FBIHQ HAS DETERMINED THAT THERE IS NO ONEBY NAME OF ROBERT LEE LEWIS EMPLOYED AS AN INVESTIGATOR FOR THECHURCH COMMITTEE. IN VIEW THAT LEWIS HAS IMPERSONATED AGOVERNMENT INVESTIGATOR AND HAS ATTEMPTED TO OBTAIN INFORMATIONTHROUGH THIS IMPERSONATION, YOU ARE INSTRUCTED TO IMMEDIATELYCONDUCT APPROPRIATE IMPERSONATION INVESTIGATION, POSITIVELYIDENTIFY LEWIS, OBTAIN TELEPHONE NUMBER OF LEWIS FROM EDMONTGOMERY, AND SET FORTH LEADS FOR WFO TO HANDLE INTERVIEWOF SUBJECT. COPY OF REFERENCED TELETYPE HAS BEEN FURNISHED WFO.END.CAL:mer (9)NOTE: SAC, SF advised by teletype 2/23/76, that a Robert LeeLewis, alleged investigator of the Church Committee, hadattempted to get someone to testify before the committeeconcerning the mishandling of the Hearst case. Inquiry hasdetermined that Lewis is not employed by the Church Committee.This instructs LA to conduct appropriate impersonationinvestigation.
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 222]
SF 475NR J10 SF PLAIN4:20 PM NITEL 2/23/76 MCCTO DIRECTOR (62-116395)FROM SAN FRANCISCO (62-6887)ATTN LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISIONSENSTJOY 75ON FEBRUARY 23, 1976, A SOURCE OF THE OAKLAND RESIDENTAGENCY REPORTED THAT ROBERT LEE LEWIS, INVESTIGATOR FOR THECHURCH COMMITTEE, HAD BEEN TRYING TO GET SOMEONE TO TESTIFYBEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE MISHANDLING OF THE HEARST CASE.HE WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH ED MONTGOMERY, ARETIRED EXAMINER REPORTER, AND POSSIBLY THE HEARSTS.SAC BATES HAS BEEN PERSONALLY ACQUAINTED WITH MONTGOMERYFOR MANY YEARS. HE CALLED MONTGOMERY AND ASKED HIM CONCERNINGTHE ABOVE. MONTGOMERY SAID THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALLFROM A THIRD PARTY ASKING HIM TO CALL LEWIS IN WASHINGTON ASHE WANTED ADVERSE TESTIMONY ABOUT THE FBI. MONTGOMERY CALLEDAND WHEN UNABLE TO SPEAK WITH LEWIS AND AFTER BEING ADVISED OFWHAT LEWIS WANTED, HE HUNG UP. ON SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1976LEWIS CALLED MONTGOMERY. HE TOLD MONTGOMERY HE WANTED SOMEONETO TESTIFY AS TO HOW, THE, FBI HAD MESSED UP THINGS ON THE WESTCOAST. MONTGOMERY IS NOT SURE IF HE SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED.ICC LCD
[124-10183-10277_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 223]
PAGE TJO SF 62-8667THE HEARST CASE. MONTGOMERY TOLD LEWIS HE HAD NOTHING IN THIS REGARD HE COULD TESTIFY TO, THAT THE FOI WAS DOING A FINE JOB, THAT HE, MONTGOMERY, DID NOT APPROVE OF THE WAY THE CHURCH COMMITTEE HAD HANDLED ITSELF IN THE PAST AND THAT THEY SHOULD GET OFF OF THE BACKS OF THE CIA AND THE FOI AND LET THEM GET ON WITH THE JOB AND THEN HUNG UP.MONTGOMERY MADE THE COMMENT THAT HE THOUGHT THIS WAS A TERRIBLE WAY TO ATTEMPT TO GET FACTS. SAC BATES SUGGESTED TO HIM IF HE FELT SO STRONGLY ABOUT IT, HE SHOULD CONSIDER WRITING AN ARTICLE FOR THE EXAMINER AS TO THE APPROACH MADE TO HIM BY THE COMMITTEE. MONTGOMERY RETIRED SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, BUT IS STILL CLOSE TO THE EXAMINER.ABOVE BEING SUBMITTED FOR BUREAU'S INFORMATION.END![handwritten notes dated 2/23/74 indicating Lewis per Elliff SSC is not a staff member prd.]
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 0]
# File #:62-116395# Serial Scope:1ST NR 14412ND NR 1444, 3RD NR 14441ST NR 1445 THRU 14471449 THRU 145214571459 THRU 14631465 THRU 14671469, 14701472 THRU 14741475
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 1]
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERALWASHINGTON, D.C. 20530FEB 10 1976TO: John A. Mintz, Assistant DirectorLegal Counsel DivisionFederal Bureau of InvestigationFROM: Steven K. BlackhurstAssistant Special Counsel forIntelligence CoordinationSUBJECT: Senate Select Committee Requestdated February 9, 1976Attached is a letter from the Senate Select Committeedated February 9, 1976. Please arrange for an appropriateresponse.EX-115EC-38 62-116395-14757 MAR 1924/ENCLOSUREFENCL BEHIND FILEcc: Paul DalyALL FBI INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 2/6/07 BY SP2A/MICPNW:88326 DocId:32989603 Page-2
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 8]
# Security Requirements for Government EmploymentExecutive Order 11785. June 4, 1974.AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10450, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSESBy virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including 5 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*, 3301, 3571, 7301, 7313, 7501(c), 7512, 7532, and 7533; and as President of the United States, and finding such action necessary in the best interests of national security, it is hereby ordered as follows:SECTION 1. Section 12 of Executive Order No. 10450 of April 27, 1953, as amended, is revised to read in its entirety as follows:"Sec. 12. Executive Order No. 9835 of March 21, 1947, as amended, is hereby revoked."SEC. 2. Neither the Attorney General, nor the Subversive Activities Control Board, nor any other agency shall designate organizations pursuant to section 12 of Executive Order No. 10450, as amended, nor circulate nor publish a list of organizations previously so designated. The list of organizations previously designated is hereby abolished and shall not be used for any purpose.SEC. 3. Subparagraph (5) of paragraph (a) of section 8 of Executive Order No. 10450, as amended, is revised to read as follows:"Knowing membership with the specific intent of furthering the aims of, or adherence to and active participation in, any foreign or domestic organization, association, movement, group, or combination of persons (hereinafter referred to as organizations) which unlawfully advocates or practices the commission of acts of force or violence to prevent others from exercising their rights under the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any State, or which seeks to overthrow the Government of the United States, or any State or subdivision thereof by unlawful means."SEC. 4. Executive Order No. 11605 of July 2, 1971, is revoked.The White House,June 4, 1974.RICHARD NIXON[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 3:05 p.m., June 4, 1974]"Presidential Documents"Volume 10 Number 23Pages 572 and 573June 10, 1974
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 9]
# Office of the Attorney GeneralWashington, D.C.December 5, 1947MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HOOVERDIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONThis will refer to your memorandum of November 22 with reference to the Marais Childs column appearing in The Washington Post on November 18, 1947 and to your letters of November 21, the one addressed to Mr. Childs and the other addressed to Mr. Paul A. Walker, Acting Chairman, Federal Communications Commission.It is my view that the Bureau's practice of passing along to the various Government departments and agencies information which comes to its attention in connection with the conduct of investigations normally and regularly within the Bureau's jurisdiction is entirely appropriate and correct. Indeed, it would appear that the Bureau would be remiss in its duty if it failed to pass along information coming to it which might prove to be in the interest of the general welfare. It is not the Bureau's responsibility to determine whether the information is or is not of importance to the particular agency in the carrying out of its current activities and responsibilities and whether or not any action is taken by the department or agency is not, of course, a principal concern of the Bureau.I believe, therefore, that the Bureau should continue its practice of passing along information which it is believed. might be of interest to the various departments and agencies. At the same time I believe that it would be appropriate either (a) to prepare a circular to the various departments and agencies explaining the Bureau's purpose in furnishing information from time to time, or (b) to make a particular effort for a time when transmitting individual items of information to explain in the transmittal memorandum the Bureau's purpose in. making such transmittal.Attorney Gensfal
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 10]
# United States Department of Justice## Federal Bureau of Investigation### Washington 25, D. C.November 21, 1947Mr. Paul A. WalkerActing ChairmanFederal Communications CommissionWashington, D. C.Dear Mr. Walker:Under date of November 18, 1947, there appeared in the column of Mr. Marquis Childs in the Washington Post the following statement attributed to Mr. Clifford J. Durr of the Federal Communications Commission: "Already the FBI is furmishing to the commission unsolicited reports on individuals connected with radio, and I can assure you that if you should be told the kind of things contained in many of these reports you would dismiss the information as baseless gossip,"The Federal Bureau of Investigation has referred to the Federal Communications Commission from time to time information which it has received in the course of its regular investigations which appeared pertinent or material to matters within the jurisdiction of the Commission. It is the policy and practice of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to avoid any attempts to evaluate the significance of information relating to matters without its jurisdiction or the effect of such information upon the contemporary policies and programs of other agencies. As a result, the Bureau furnishes to the various Government departments such information as it receives which appears pertinent to the operations of those Government departments. In so far as is practicable, the Bureau attempts to evaluate the reliability of the source of this information without attempting to make any suggestions as to the use which should or should not be made of the information itself.Mr. Childs, in his column quoting Mr. Durr's statement, adds the following observation upon Mr. Durr's statement: "Note the word 'unsolicited'. It indicates that the FBI initiated investigations and sought to influence FCC decisions by sending reports on certain individuals to the commission. If this is happening, it is something Congress should know about."I desire to advise you that this Bureau has not at any time attempted in any manner or degree to influence FCC decisions. The material which has been transmitted to the Commission was sent solely for the purpose of affording the Commission information which came to the Bureau from various sources, which information, it was believed, might be of interest to the official activities of the Commission.
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 11]
In the light of the statements made by Mr. Durr and since these statements have not been repudiated by any other members of the Federal Communications Commsssion, I must assume that the material which the Bureau has been fuwnishing to the Commission is not desired by the Commission. I am consequently discontinuing the transmittal of such data to the Commission upon the assumption that the material is of no interest to the Commission.Very truly yours,John Edgar HooverDirector- 2 -  NW 88326 DocId:32989603 Page 12