Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 252]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO: Mr. J. B. AdamsFROM: Legal CounselSUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75Pursuant to a request from SA Thomas J. McNiffSA Daly of this Division contacted Michael Shaheen, Deputy SpecialCounsel for Intelligence Coordination for the Department, on 7-22-75concerning the current policy regarding excisions which may properlybe made on documents being furnished to the Senate Select Committeefor their review in Bureau space and the policy concerning notes beingtaken during the Committee staffers review of such materials.Shaheen stated that there is no agreement currently inoperation concerning *excisions*, however, he felt that excisions shouldbe properly restricted to the protection of sources, sensitive techniquesor methods concerning sensitive ongoing operations. He noted that thisis in general conformity with the proposed agreement concerning this matterwhich was being reviewed at the White House. Regarding the questionraised concerning the taking of notes, Shaheen indicated that the proposednew agreement allowed for the taking of notes on these documents whichnotes may be taken to the Senate Select Committee offices. In fact,Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination, K. William O'Connor, whowas present during this discussion pointed out it was the intent of theaforementioned proposed agreement that "screened documents" may beremoved by the Committee staff members to the Senate Select Committeeoffices. With this in mind, Shaheen stated we should allow the staffmembers to take notes and remove same to their offices.SA McNiff was orally advised of the results of this conversation.RECOMMENDATION:For information.1 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. Cregar1 - Mr. Mintz1 - Mr. Hotis1 - Mr. DalyPVD:dkg (7)
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 253]
# MemorandumTO: Mr. W.R. WannallyFROM: J.W. RedfieldSUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75PURPOSE:To comment on items extracted from a 693-page document prepared by CIA citing certain instances wherein CIA believes its activities may have exceeded its legal mandate.BACKGROUND:Memorandum W.O. Cregar to Mr. W.R. Wannall, dated 7/24/75, captioned as above, described the above-mentioned CIA document and requested a review of certain items mentioned therein in order to fully identify the subject matter thereof and to assess whether same may involve any compromise of FBI counterintelligence operations.CIA item captioned "Antlers," relates that CIA arranged to move a sensitive defector out of a European country by commercial transportation and gained entry into the U.S. without leaving any trace of the defector's true identity. FBIHQ COMMENT: Our files contain no information concerning the word "Antlers," in the context described by CIA. More than likely, "Antlers" is a CIA in-house code word used for the handling of a valuable and sensitive defector source. While we have no information relative to "Antlers," it is noted that we do have access currently to two CIA defector sources respectively code named TORTIS and TUMBLE, both of whom were Romanian Intelligence Service (RIS) officers whose whereabouts have been carefully concealed as both of these defectors are targets of the RIS. Specifically, the RIS has indicated a desire to kidnap and/or kill the two defectors mentioned herein. It is possible the CIA item referred to as "Antlers" may relate to either TORTIS or TUMBLE. It is firmly believed that public disclosure of the CIA item mentioned beyond that described in the attachment to W.O. Cregar's memorandum of 7/24/75, could adversely affect the safety and security of TORTIS or TUMBLE, if in fact, either one is the defector described in the CIA item.62-116395JFM:bcw Classified by 2721Exempt from GDS, Categories 2, 3 and 4Date of Declassification IndefiniteCONTINUED - OVER
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 254]
SECRETMemorandum to Mr. W.R. WannallRE: SENSTUDY 7562-116395CIA item described as Project WESTPOINTER apparently involved the examination of mail to the U.S. from Mainland China during certain specific months of 1969, 1970 and 1971. CIA indicated that Project WESTPOINTER was similar to Project SRPOINTER. FBIHQ COMMENT: Our files contain no information concerning Project WESTPOINTER. Memorandum from Acting Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, dated 4/1/75, captioned "Jane Fonda v. L. Patrick Gray, et al.; Civil Action No. 73-2442-MML (C.D. Cal.)," describes a CIA covert operation known as SRPOINTER which involved examination of mail to and from the Soviet Union which was discontinued in 2/73. Apparently, CIA had examined certain mail addressed to Jane Fonda in connection with its SRPOINTER activity. While we were not aware of CIA's Project WESTPOINTER, it is noted that this Bureau did periodically examine mail coming from the People's Republic of China (PRC) and Hong Kong to the U.S. and mail from the U.S. to the PRC and Hong Kong during the period 1956-1966. This activity, which was permanently discontinued 1/24/66, was carried under the code names CHIPROP and CHICLET. Public disclosure of the CIA item referred to above as Project WESTPOINTER might lead to a more detailed public examination of this Bureau's periodic control of mail in the CHIPROP and CHICLET operations.ACTION: For information in connection with Senstudy 75.SECRET- 2 -NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 255
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 255]
DCI/IC-75-012623 July 1975MEMORANDUM FOR: Members of the USIB Ad HocCoordinating GroupSUBJECT: Key Words for Central IndexingFuture key wording of information furnished to the Community Central Index should include names of Agencies.These will be helpful in identifying information in the material which relates to another Agency's activities.Harriett MowittExecutive SecretaryUSIB Ad Hoc Coordinating Group
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 256]
The Attorney GeneralDirector, FBI1 - Mr. J. B. Adams1 - Mr. H. N. Bassett2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)July 22, 19751 - Mr. W. R. Wannall1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar1 - Mr. J. P. ThomasUNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEEON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)Reference is made to a letter from the SSC dated May 14, 1975, with attached appendices A thru D requesting certain documents and other information from the FBI.Attached for your approval and forwarding to SSC is the original of a memorandum which responds in part to one of the requests contained in above SSC letter.A copy of the memorandum is being furnished for your records.Enclosures (2)62-1163951 - The Deputy Attorney GeneralAttention: K. William O'ConnorSpecial Counsel for Intelligence CoordinationJPT:1hb/hb (11)![photo of handwritten signatures and stamps]NW 88296 DocId:32989624 Page 257
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 257]
62-1163951 - Mr. J. B. Adams1 - Mr. H. N. Bassett2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)1 - Mr. W. R. WannallJuly 22, 19751 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar1 - Mr. J. P. ThomasU. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE TOSTUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITHRESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)RE: FURTHER DOCUMENTS PERTALINGTO THE FBI AND DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICEPOLICIES AND PROCEDURESReference is made to letter, with attachedappendices, dated May 14, 1975, to the Attorney Generalfrom the Chairman of captioned Committee, requesting certaindocuments and other information from the Federal Bureau ofInvestigation (FBI).Appendix B, Item I, Number 5 of referencedappendices requested this Bureau to provide Committee Staffaccess to annual inspection reports and related surveys forthe past ten years with respect to the following FDI fieldoffices: l'ew York City; Chicago; San Francisco; Los Angeles;San Diego; Sacramento; Springfield, Illinois; Buffalo;Atlanta; and Columbia, South Carolina; Number 6 requestedthis Bureau to provide the annual inspection reports andrelated surveys for the past ten years pertaining to the FDIIntelligence Division.At a conference held on May 30, 1975, betweenMessrs. John T. Elliff and Mark Gitenstein of the SenateSelect Committee; Mr. K. William O'Connor of the Departmentof Justice; and Messrs. William O. Cregar and Elmer W.Larson of the FBI, it was agreed, in response to above request,that this Bureau would make available to appropriate personnelof the SSC Staff, for review at FBIHQ, copies of the reportsJPT:1hb(10)Assoc. Dir.Dep. AD Adm.Dep. AD Inv.Asst. Dir.:Admin.Comp. Syst.Ext. AffairsFiles & Com.Gen. Inv.Ident.InspectionIntell.LaboratoryPlan. & Eval.Spec. Inv.TrainingLegal Coun.Telephone Rm.Director Sec'yMAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT ENCLOSURENW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 258
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 258]
RE: Further Documents Pertaining to the FBI and Department of JusticePolicies and ProceduresOf the two inspections conducted of the Domestic Intelligence Division, FBI Headquarters, during 1971, and of the inspection of the San Francisco Field Office of the FBI during October, 1970.Pertinent documents, believed responsive to above agreement, are now ready for review at FBI Headquarters by appropriate personnel of the SSC Staff. You will note that portions of the San Francisco inspection report which relate solely to investigations of criminal matters, with no security ramifications, have been eliminated from the report. Should the SSC deem such material pertinent to its mandate, however, it can be made available for review by the SSC Staff, upon written request.1 - The Attorney General- 2 -NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 259
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 259]
5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONWASHINGTON, D. C. 20535Addressee: Senate Select Committee☐LTR ☑LHM ☐Memo ☐Report dated 7-22-75U. S. Senate Select Committeeto Study Governm Open-Caption of Document: ations. Re: Further Documents Pertain-ing to the FBI and Dept. of Justice. Policies and Pro-cedures. 5-14-75 request Appendix B, Item I, #5.Originating Office: FBIDelivered by: Date: 7/24/75Received by:Title:Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI#MDR16ALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 10/2/00 BY SP2 ALM 1776ENCLOSURE 62-116595-453
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 260]
# Abstract of Information Provided to Select CommitteesTO: Intelligence Community StaffATTN: Central IndexFROM: FBI1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term. If a document was made available for review but not transmitted, so note.)*   DOCUMENT2. DATE PROVIDED 7/22/75FOR REVIEW3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)*   SSCHSC4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer, interviewee, testifier and subject)Memorandum5. IN RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in response to formal request, otherwise state verbal request of (name), initiative, subpoena, etc.)SSC letter 5/14/75, Appendix B, Item 1, #56. CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION (enter U, C, S, TS or Codeword)U7. KEY WORDS (enter the appropriate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are used underline for emphasis)Operating procedures#MOR168. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)Made available to appropriate personnel of the SSC Staff, for review at FBIER, copies of the reports of the two inspections conducted of the Domestic Intelligence Division, FDI Headquarters, during 1971, and of the inspection of the San Francisco Field Office of the FBI during October, 197062-116395FMK: fmk(4)ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75TREAT AS YELLOW
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 261]
# INSTRUCTIONS*   Type or print clearly in ink.*   Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.*   Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.*   "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the information.*   If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here, e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional pages may be attached if necessary.NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 262
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 262]
WR006 SE CODED4:50 PM NITEL 7/21/75 SLATO DIRECTOR (62-116395)FROM SEATTLE (66-2894)SENSTUDY 75.FEDERAL E NVESTIGATION COMMUNICATIONS SECTIONJUL 21197.TELETYPERE BUREAU NITEL, JULY 17, 1975.Assoc. Dir.Dep.-A.D.-Adm.Dep.-A.D.-Inv.Asst. Dir.:Admin.Comp. Syst.Ext. AffairsFiles & Com.Gen. Inv.Ident.Inspection,Intell.LaboratoryPlan. & Eval.Spec. Inv.Tr. iningLegal Coun.Telephone Rm.Director Seg'yFORMER EMPLOYEE, LEROY W. SHEETS NO LONGER MAINTAINS RESIDENCE AT MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON, HE HAS PURCHASED AN AIRSTREAM TRAILER AND ON JUNE 10, 1975, HE AND HIS WIFE LEFT THE AREA FOR AN EXTENDED FOUR-MONTHS CROSSCOUNTRY TRIP, PRIOR TO LEAVING, SHEETS ADVISED SRA JOHN E. CONNOR, EVERETT, WASHINGTON, THAT HE WOULD BE TRAVELING CONTINUOUSLY UNTIL MID-OCTOBER, 1975, WHEN HE WOULD RETURN TO THE MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON AREA. CURRENT LOCATION OF SHEETS IS UNKNOWN.SHEETS IS BELIEVED TO STILL HAVE A MARRIED STEPDAUGHTER, NAME UNKNOWN, IN THE MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON AREA. SHE MAY HAVE AN ITINERARY FOR SHEETS THAT COULD LOCATE HIM FOR A POSSIBLE INTERVIEW. IF BUREAU DESIRES HER CONTACTED, A REVIEW OF PERSONNEL FILE OF SHEETS AT HEADQUARTERS SHOULD PROVIDE HER NAME AND ADDRESS.ENDHOLDMSY FBIHQCOPY RETAINED IN PERSONNEL RECOCCi 67(SHEETS)REC-88:42-116393-7#MDR 16ALL INFORMATION CONCIEN HOREN AS U2.45 JUL-975DAN 10/2100 SP2 ALM LITE
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 263]
CODETELETYPETO SACS LOS ANGELESSAN DIEGOSAN FRANCISCOFROM DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116395)SENSTUDY 75REBUTEL MAY 2, 1975.1 - Mr. J. B. AdamsNITEL3 - Mr. J. A. MintzJULY 30, 1975(1 - Mr. Hotis)(1 - Mr. Daly)1 - Mr. E. W. Walsh1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar1 - Mr. S. F. PhillipsSENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC) STAFF MEMBER LESTER SEIDELHAS FURNISHED THE FOLLOWING TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR INTERVIEWSIN YOUR OFFICE: SAN DIEGO 7-30-75 SAS EARL M. PETERSEN,LAWRENCE F. WIRICK; LOS ANGELES 8-5-75 WALLACE E. WARD, RICHARDA. BLOESER, 8-7-75 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ROBERT E. GEBHARDT; SANFRANCISCO 8-11-75 LEO S. BRENNEISEN, 8/11-12/75 SAC CHARLES W.BATES. PURPOSE OF INTERVIEW IS TO BE COINTELPRO AND BUREAUINVESTIGATION OF THE BLACK PANTHER PARTY. ADDITIONALLY SACBATES WILL BE INTERVIEWED CONCERNING KNOWLEDGE OF "KOUSTON PLAN"BY SSC STAFF MEMBER LOCH JOHNSON.I HAVE WAIVED YOUR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OFTHESE INTERVIEWS. EACH SHOULD NOTE THAT HE HAS THE RIGHT TOCOUNSEL; HOWEVER, THE FEI IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE PRIVATE COUNSEL.THERE ARE CERTAIN PRIVILEGED AREAS CONCERNING WHICH SAS WOULDPVD/SFP:mjgm's(10)FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCOMMUNICATIONS SECTIONJUL 30 1975943PTELETYPE UNITSEE NOTE PAGE THREE![photo of handwritten notes]
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 264]
PAGE TWO 62-116395NOT BE REQUIRED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. AREAS CONCERN INFORMATION WHICH MIGHT DIVULGE IDENTITIES OF FBI SOURCES; INFORMATION RELATING TO SENSITIVE METHODS AND TECHNIQUES; INFORMATION WHICH MIGHT ADVERSELY AFFECT ONGOING FDI INVESTIGATIONS; AND INFORMA- TION WHICH ORIGINATED WITH OTHER AGENCIES, INCLUDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES.SAN FRANCISCO NOTE RELEASE ALSO APPLIES TO FORMER SAS ALBERT P. CLARK AND WILLIAM A. COHENDET WHO, ALONG WITH OTHER EX-SAS ON WEST COAST, MAY ALSO BE INTERVIEWED. CLARK AND COHENDET HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED FOREGOING ADVICE REGARDING PRIVATE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGED AREAS AND HAVE ASKED FOR CONSULTATION ASSISTANCE WHICH BUREAU IS APPROVING AS BELOW.NORMALLY, FBIHQ WOULD SUPPLY REPRESENTATIVE TO BE ON-THE- SCENE FOR CONSULTATION PURPOSES. HOWEVER, DISTANCE AND TIME SCOPE MAKES THIS NOT FEASIBLE IN THIS INSTANCE.THE RANKING FBI OFFICIAL IN EACH OFFICE WILL SERVE FOR CONSULTATION PURPOSES. IN HIS ABSENCE, AN SAC IN LOS ANGELES OR ASAC IN SAN DIEGO AND SAN FRANCISCO MAY SO SERVE. PURPOSE OF CONSULTANT, WHO WILL NOT BE PRESENT AT INTERVIEW BUT AVAILABLE NEARBY, WILL BE TO SUPPLY ASSISTANCE IN THE EVENT PERSON BEING- 2 -NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 265
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 265]
PAGE THREE 62-116395INTERVIEWED IS ASKED QUESTIONS IN ONE OF THE PRIVILEGED AREASOR QUESTIONS OUTSIDE THE SPECIFIED PARAMETERS OF THE INTERVIEW(COINTELPRO/BLACK PANTHER PARTY). SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE WHICHCONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE CANNOT HANDLE, SUGGEST IMMEDIATETELEPHONE CALL TO LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION.SHOULD ADDITIONAL FORMER SAS CONTACT YOUR OFFICE FOR ASSISTANCE,COORDINATE WITH THEM WAIVER FROM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THROUGHLEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION AND FURNISH CONSULTATION SERVICES ASREQUESTED.NOTE THAN RANKING OFFICIAL SERVING IN CONSULTANTPOSITION DOES NOT REPRESENT THE PARTICULAR EMPLOYEE AS PRIVATECOUNSEL.NOTE:The referenced 5/2/75 teletype apprised all offices ofour cooperation with the SSC and furnished general background reBureau's servicing of its requests. Because of time elementrelating to the first interview to take place in San Diego 7/30/75,we are telephoning necessary instructions to that office. Wepreviously by teletype 7/9/75 advised current and former employeeson West Coast of SSC's intentions regarding these interviews. Wealso previously released SAC Bates for purpose of interview reCointelpro/BPP and are now extending release to include interviewre "Houston Plan," as requested by SSC Staff Member Johnson 7/25/75.Former SAS Clark and Cohendet previously given necessaryadvice by Legal Counsel Division as indicated above and offermade for consultation services which they requested.NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 266- 3 -
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 266]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO : MR. CALLAHANDATE: 6/9/75FROM : H. N. BASSETTSUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75In response to a Senate Select Committee request for guidelines utilized by the Inspection Division, memorandum H. N. Bassett to W. R. Wannall dated 6/2/75, captioned as above, noted there would be no objection to a review of the Handbooks for Headquarters and field office inspections by Committee Staff members provided the review was conducted in FBI space with an Inspection Division representative present.On 7/8/75 Mr. Mark Gitenstein of the Select Committee Staff reviewed the FBIHQ Inspection Manual in the presence of SA Fred B. Griffith. Mr. Gitenstein was specifically advised these Manuals are used solely as guidelines for the Inspection Staff and are not binding on anyone but staff members. They cannot be used to document any deficiencies noted during an inspection. He was told such action would have to be based on applicable provisions in either the Manual of Instructions or the Manual of Rules and Regulations.During the review it was noted Mr. Gitenstein made notes regarding the following Sections:1.  Section 2 (Recording the Inspection Findings), pages 5 and 6 which deal with the assembly and distribution of inspection reports and work papers.2.  Section 4 (Specific Division Operations), pages 4 and 5 which are concerned with surveys and audits.3.  Section 8 (Inspector's Summaries), pages 1, 2 and 4 which deal with the summary for the Director, the letter to the Division Head from the Director and personnel write-ups.Mr. Gitenstein stated he would return at a later date to review the field manual.ACTION: None. . . for information.1- Messrs. Adams, Wannall, CregarBuy U.S., Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 267]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO: Mr. J. B. AdamsFROM: Legal/CounselSUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75DATE: 7-7-75By memorandum, 6-18-75, you were advised the Department was considering preparing summaries of existing summaries of the so-called "Kissinger 17" wiretaps to be furnished the Senate Select Committee (SSC). The Department was awaiting our approval of this mode of response to the Committee. The referenced memorandum recommended we advise the Department that we agreed on the preparation of the summaries with the provision that we be allowed to review same prior to the Department seeking Court approval for making them available to the Senate Select Committee. This recommendation was approved.Michael Shaheen, Deputy Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination in the Department, inquired of Special Agent Paul V. Daly as to when the aforementioned summaries would be completed. He was informed it was the Bureau's understanding the Department would prepare the summaries. Mr. Shaheen, after consulting with K. William O'Connor, Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination, stated it was the Department's desire that the Bureau prepare the summaries. He advised the Departmental attorneys concerned with the litigation arising from these wiretaps will review the summaries and seek Court approval prior to furnishing to the Committee.RECOMMENDATION:Intelligence Division with the assistance of Legal Counsel prepare the necessary summaries for forwarding to the Committee.1 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. Cregar1 - Mr. Mintz1 - Mr. Hotis1 - Mr. Peterson1 - Mr. Daly
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 268]
CODECABLEGRAMURGENTTO LEGAT LONDONFROM DIRECTOR FBI1-Legal Counsel Office(Attn: Mr. Daly)1-Foreign Liaison1-Mr. Cregar1-Mr. Helgeson7/28/75SENATE SELECT COMMITTEEMARK GITENSTEIN, SENIOR STAFF MEMBER, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY EXAMINING PROCEDURES OF U.S. INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, HAS ADVISED THAT THE COMMITTEE HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN HOW OTHER COUNTRIES HANDLE THEIR DOMESTIC SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS; THAT IS, THOSE INVESTIGATIONS ANALOGOUS TO OUR EXTREM-IST AND SUBVERSIVE INVESTIGATIONS. GITENSTEIN IS LEAVING FOR LONDON AUGUST SIX NEXT AND HAS INDICATED A DESIRE TO MEET WITH APPROPRIATE BRITISH OFFICIALS ANY TIME AUGUST ELEVEN OR TWELVE NEXT FOR A GENERAL BRIEFING IF THIS IS POSSIBLE. HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO LEGAT SITTING IN ON SUCH BRIEFING.GITENSTEIN'S REQUEST HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH JOHN[^5]HEH:enm (6)SEE NOTE PAGE TWOFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION COMMUNICATIONS SECTIONJUL 29 1975TELETYPEJUL 31 1975[^5]: [photo of text from footer]
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 269]
CABLEGRAM TO LONDONRE: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE(PARKER, COUNSELOR, MI-5, WASHINGTON, WHO SUGGESTSYOU CONTACT MI-5 LIAISON TO DETERMINE HOW THIS SHOULDBE HANDLED. BUREAU SUGGESTS THAT IN ADDITION YOUCONTACT SCOTLAND YARD IF YOU FEEL IT APPROPRIATE. ](s)HANDLE AND SUCAB ARRANGEMENTS, ATTENTION:HELGESON, INTD.NOTE: Gitenstein made the above oral request to InspectorHelgeson during a meeting 7/25/75. This is beingcoordinated with Supervisor Paul Daly with the Officeof Legal Counsel.