Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 196]
# CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATETO: Intelligence Community StaffATTN: Central IndexFROM:FBINOTE: SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSEBEFORE COMPLETING.SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term. If a document was made available for review but not transmitted, so note.)X DOCUMENT BRIEFING INTERVIEW TESTIMONY OTHER2. DATE PROVIDED2-27-763. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)X SSCHSC4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer, interviewee, testifier and subject)Memorandum5. IN RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in response to formal request, other- wise state verbal request of (name), initiative, subpoena, etc.)SSC letter 2-19-766. CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION (enter U, C, S, TS or Codeword)U7. KEY WORDS (enter the appropriate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are used underline for emphasis)Information handling8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)Access to material relating to Soviet Embassy, Mexico City.![ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED DATE 1/19/01 BY SPRAUMKP]62-116395SJM:ds ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX(4) IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75.![TREAT AS YELLOW]3791 (6-75)NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 197![CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE ENCLOSURE] 62-116375-11-1![5-M4]
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 197]
## INSTRUCTIONS*   Type or print clearly in ink.*   Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.*   Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.*   "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the information.*   If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.## SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARYenter brief narrative statement describing substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here, e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional pages may be attached if necessary.
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 198]
# OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERALWASHINGTON, D.C. 20530MAR 8 1976TO: John Mintz, Assistant DirectorLegal Counsel DivisionFederal Bureau of InvestigationFROM: Steven BlackhurstAssistant Special Counsel forIntelligence CoordinationSUBJECT: SSC Letter Dated March 5, 1976The attached letter from the Senate Select Committee was discussed with Mr. Sam Miller of the Bureau on March 5, 1976. It requires no response unless the FBI has objections to the draft SSC report on mail opening.> [ENCLOSURE]cc: Paul Daly![FBI ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREINI IS UNCLASSIFIED DATE 1190 BY SPAALMI]![REVOLUTION AMERICAN 84 MAR 1 8 1976]NW 88326 DocId:32989603 Page 199
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 199]
FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMANJOHN G. TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMANPHILIP A. HART, MICH. HOWARD H. BAKER, TENN.WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN. BARRY GOLDWATERWALTER D. HUDDLESTON, KY. CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MD.ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, PA.GARY HART, COLO.WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTORFREDERICK A. O. SCHWARZ, JR., CHIEF COUNSELCURTIS R. SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL# United States SenateSELECT COMMITTEE TOSTUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITHRESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES(PURSUANT TO S. RES. 21, 94TH CONGRESS)WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510March 5, 1976Michael E. Shaheen, Jr., EsquireOffice of Professional ResponsibilityRoom 4313U.S. Department of JusticeWashington, D.C. 20530Dear Mike:On March 4, 1976, Mr. James Johnson of the FBI reviewed the Select Committee's draft titled "CIA and FBI Mail Opening." James Dick and Thomas Dawson of the Committee staff revised the draft to meet all security problems previously raised by Mr. James Lee of the Bureau, and discussed the revisions with Mr. Johnson to make certain that their concerns were met.This letter is to confirm the fact that, unless I receive word to the contrary from you, the Department of Justice has no objection to the publication of this report.Thanks again for your help throughout the inquiry into this subject.Sincerely,Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr.Chief CounselCopy to Paul DalyALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BY SP2ALM\P![MAR 5 1976 RECEIVED stamp]62-116 395-144ENCLOSURENW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 200
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 200]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTMemorandumTO: Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 3/4/76FROM: Legal CounselSUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75It was brought to the attention of the Legal Counsel Division that in the Senate Select Committee report concerning COINTELPRO the identities of Agents were contained which are below the level of Section Chief. The prior procedure and policy of the Senate Select Committee was not to include anybody below a policymaking position which it equated with Section Chief or above.F. A. O. Schwartz, Counsel to captioned Committee, was contacted concerning this matter and Schwartz stated that he wanted to assure the Bureau that there would be no names of Agent personnel included in the report under the title of Section Chief. He indicated that their procedures and policies concerning utilization of the identity of Agent personnel will be consistent with the policies established by their Bureau mail opening report. This report was written by James Dick of the Committee and contains the identity of only one Section Chief and that is William A. Branigan. No one below the rank of Section Chief was identified. In fact, Dick did not identify SACs involved in this operation.RECOMMENDATION:For information.1 - Mr. Mintz1 - Mr. Leavitt1 - Mr. Phillips1 - Mr. DalyALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 201]
# The Attorney GeneralDirector, FBIU.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEEON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)1 - Mr. J.B. Adams1 - Mr. Mintz1 - Mr. WalshFebruary 27, 19761 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. Cregar1 - Mr. Shackelford1 - Mr. Deegan1 - Mr. NewmanOn February 19, 1976, at the invitation of Staff Member Robert Kelley of the SSC, Supervisors Edward P. Grigalus and Homer A. Newman, Jr., reviewed the proposed draft of the Committee as it pertains to informants in the domestic security field. This review was for the purpose of determining if any information was contained therein which would expose informants or jeopardize any ongoing investigative activities in the internal security field as it pertains to informants.Enclosed for your approval and forwarding to the SSC is the original of a memorandum setting forth the results of our review of this proposed draft.A copy of the above memorandum is being furnished for your records.Enclosures (2)62-116395GEC-104 62-116315-1447MAR 10 19761 - The Deputy Attorney GeneralAttention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.Special Counsel forIntelligence CoordinationHAN:tdp (12)SEE NOTE PAGE TWO![illegible handwriting and stamps on the document]TO BE HAND-DELIVERED BY THE OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRSMAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNITMAR 11 1976NW 88326 DocId: 32989603 Page 202
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 202]
The Attorney GeneralNOTE:This is the first instance wherein the SSC has made available for review a proposed rough draft of a segment of the upcoming SSC report. It is expected that other segments will be made available by the Committee Staff Members. It was necessary to review this proposed draft in the offices of the SSC since they do not contemplate permitting proposed drafts to leave their premises. The approval for the use of information from the 2 classified documents has been coordinated with the IS-2 Section of the Intelligence Division and with the Budget and Accounting Section of the Administrative Division. The handling of the budget figure as set forth has been approved by Asst. Director E.W. Walsh.
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 203]
62-1163951 - Mr. Adams1 - Mr. Mintz1 - Mr. Walsh1 - Mr. Wannall1 - Mr. CregarFebruary 27, 19761 - Mr. ShackelfordU. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE Mr. DeeganSTUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITHRESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)1- Mr. NewmanOn February 19, 1976, at the invitation ofStaff Member Robert Kelley of the SSC, SupervisorsEdward P. Grigalus and Homer A. Newman, Jr., reviewedthe proposed draft of the Committee's report as itpertains to informants in the domestic security field.This review was conducted for the purpose of deter-mining if the report contained any information whichwould expose our informants or jeopardize any ongoinginvestigations or investigative techniques in thedomestic internal security field as it pertains toinformants. This review did not detect any suchinstances.Two instances were noted, however, whereinformation was set forth taken from classified docu-ments.(1) In connection with internal security -intelligence program supports, through the use ofinformants, a figure of $7,401,000 was used in theCommittee's draft. This figure was taken from materialcaptioned "Federal Bureau of Investigation OverallIntelligence Program, FY 77 Budget Compared to FY 76(Dollars in Thousands)," classified "Secret," whichwas made available to the SSC by the Department.Although the document described above cannot be declassi-fied, the FBI interposes no objection to the use of theabove figure in the SSC report providing the reportso reflects that this figure not only includes paymentsmade to domestic internal security informants for ser-vices and expenses but also includes the cost of ourHAN:tdp (11)ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG62-116395-1447NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 204
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 204]
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)personnel, support costs and overhead.(2) The Committee's draft under "Case No. 5" sets forth information regarding "Fublic Meeting Oppoς-ing U. S. Involvement in Vietnam War (1966)." This information was taken from a classified document captioned "Universities Committee on Problems of War and Peace" dated March 2, 1966.The FBI cannot declassify this document since it contains information warranting its continued classification; however, the information as set forth in the Committee's draft would be unclassifiable as it appears. Therefore, the FBI does not interpose any objection to the use of this material.1 - The Attorney General- 2 -NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 205
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 205]
SECRETRECEIVED FROMFEB 12 1976DOJFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONOverall Intelligence ProgramFY 77 Budget Compared to FY 76(Dollars in Thousands)R2330pt. 4 of 4.| Program Element     | FY 1976   |         | FY 1977   |         | Change    |         || ------------------- | --------- | ------- | --------- | ------- | --------- | ------- ||                     | Workyears | Dollars | Workyears | Dollars | Workyears | Dollars || Internal Security   | 1133      | $28,286 | 1117      | $27,879 | -16       | $407    || Investigations      |           |         |           |         |           |         || Counterintelligence | 1523      | 37,237  | 1503      | 36,698  | -20       | -539    || Investigations      |           |         |           |         |           |         || Internal Security   | 207       | 7,401   | 204       | 7,294   | -3        | -107    || Intelligence        |           |         |           |         |           |         || Counterintelligence | 183       | 4,979   | 180       | 4,907   | -3        | -72     || Intelligence        |           |         |           |         |           |         || Organized Crime     | 130       | 3,709   | 128       | 3,656   | -2        | -53     || Intelligence        |           |         |           |         |           |         || General Crimes      | .294      | 8,419   | 290       | 8,295   | -4        | -124    || Intelligence        |           |         |           |         |           |         || Total Intelligence  | 3470      | $90,031 | 3422      | $88,729 | -48       | $-1,302 || Program             |           |         |           |         |           |         |ALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BY SRALMIOClassified by 9Exempt from GDS, Category 3Date of Declassification IndefiniteSECRET
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 206]
# PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS*   Internal Security - Investigations. The program focuses on identifying organizations and individuals engaged in activities relating to (1) subversion, overthrow and distruction of governments within the United States; (2) the deprivation of constitutional and civil rights; (3) and foreign terrorism and their supporters whose activity is detrimental to the conduct of United States foreign affairs.*   Counterintelligence - Investigations. Through this program, investigations are conducted to thwart intelligence operations of foreign intelligence services in the United States.*   Internal Security - Intelligence. This program supports, through the use of informants, the internal security investigative program.*   Counterintelligence - Intelligence. Through the use of informants and other techniques, this program attempts to develop assets to identify foreign intelligence officers, penetrate foreign intelligence services in the United States, and neutralize the effectiveness of foreign intelligence services in the United States.*   Organized Crime - Intelligence. This program focuses on the development and use of a corps of carefully selected, high-level informants familiar with the leadership, structure, operations, associates and revenue sources of organized crime.*   General Crimes - Intelligence. This program supports, through the use of informants, the investigation of general crimes within the FBI's jurisdiction. This program is the FBI's tactical criminal intelligence program.
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 207]
# Case No. 5--Public Meeting Opposing U.S. Involvement in Vietnam War (1965)Informers were used extensively in FBI investigations of possible Communist links to the antiwar movement. An example is the FBI's coverage of various antiwar teach-ins and conferences sponsored by the Universities Committee on Problems of War and Peace. A forty-one page report from the Philadelphia office--based on coverage by thirteen informants and confidential sources--described in complete detail a "public hearing on Vietnam." A Communist Party official had "urged all CP members" in the area to attend, and one of the organizers was alleged to have been a Communist in the early 1950's. Upon receipt from an informant of a list of the speakers, the FBI culled its files for data on their backgrounds. One was described by a source as a Young Socialist Alliance "sympathizer."![document page]NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 208
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 208]
Another was a conscientious objector to military service. A thirdhad contributed $5.000 to the National Committee to Abolish theHouse Committee on Un-American Activities. A speaker representingthe W.E.B. DuBois Club was identified as a Communist. The FBIcovered the meeting with an informant who reported practicallyverbatim the remarks of all the speakers, including the following:*   The Chairman of the Philadelphia Ethical Society*   A representative of the American Civil Liberties Union*   A representative of the United Electrical Workers*   A spokesman for the Young Americans for Freedom*   A member of the staff of the "Catholic Worker"*   A minister of the African Methodist Episcopal Church*   A minister of the Episcopal Church*   A representative of the Philadelphia Area Committee to    End the War in Vietnam*   A Professor of Industrial Economics at Columbia University*   A répresentative of the Inter-University Committee for    Debate on Foreign Policy*   A member of Women's Strike for Peace who had traveled to    North Vietnam*   A member of Women's International League for Peace and    Freedom who had visited South Vietnam*   A chaplin from Rutgers University*   A professor of political science from Villanova University*   Another member of Young Americans: for Freedom*   The former Charge d'Affaires in the South Vietnamese EmbassyThis informant's report was so extensive as to be the equivalent ofa tape rècording, although the FBI report does not indicate that theinformant was "wired." Another informant reported the remarks ofadditional participants.*   An official of the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy*   A minister of the church of the Brethren*   A Unitarian minister*   A representative of United World Federalists*   A member of Students for a Democratic Society*   A member of the Socialist Workers Party*   A spokesman for the W.E.B. DuBois ClubsThe report was prepared as a Letterhead Memorandum with fourteencopies for possible dissemination by the FBI to other ExecutiveBranch agencies. Copies were disseminated to military intelligence
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 209]
- 41 -agencies, the State Department, and the Internal Security andCivil Rights Divisions of the Justice Department. SAC, Philadelphiato the FBI Director, Re: Universities Committee on Problems ofWar and Peace, March 2, 1966 (classified)NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 210
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 210]
5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONWASHINGTON, D. C. 20535Addressee: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEELTR LHM Memo Report dated 2-26-76Caption of Document:U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)(2/19/76 review of report) concerningInformantsOriginating Office: ABIDelivered by: Date: 3/3/76Received by:Title: ATTORNY - SSCReturn this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBIALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BY SPALMKPENCLOSURE62. 116395-1447NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 211
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 211]
TO: Intelligence Community StaffATTN: Central IndexFROM: FBISUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term. If a document was made available for review but not transmitted, so note.)X DOCUMENT2. DATE PROVIDED   2/27/763. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)X SSCHSC4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer, interviewee, testifier and subject)Memorandum5. IN RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in response to formal request, otherwise state verbal request of (name), initiative, subpoena, etc.)NA6. CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION (enter U, C, S, TS or Codeword)U7. KEY WORDS (enter the appropriate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are used underline for emphasis)Operating proceduresInformation handling8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)Information regarding review of portion of proposed draft of SSC report pertaining to informants in domestic security field.62-116395SJM:1hb ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX(4) IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75.![ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED]![TREAT AS YELLOW]
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 212]
# INSTRUCTIONS*   Type or print clearly in ink.*   Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.*   Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.*   "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the information.*   If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a copy of, the original abstract, with the change indicated.SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here, e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional pages may be attached if necessary.
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 213]
# 94TH CONGRESS2D SESSION H. RES. 1073IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMARCH 4, 1976Mr. EDGAR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Com-mittee on House Administration# RESOLUTION1 Resolved, That the report of the Select Committee on2 Intelligence filed on January 29, 1976, and entitled "Report3 of the Investigations of the United States Intelligence Agen-4 cies and Activities" shall be printed as a House documentV![ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED DATE 1/19/01 BY]![file 5-7m]NW 88326. Docld:32989603 Page 214
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 214]
94TH CONGRESS2D SESSION H. RES. 1073# RESOLUTIONOrdering the printing of the report of the Select Committee on.Intelligence.By Mr. EDGARMARCH 4, 1976-Referred to the Committee on House Administration![image of document page]NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 215
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 215]
94TH CONGRESS2D SESSION# H. RES. 1074IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMARCH 4, 1976Mrs. FENWICK (for herself, Mr. FRENZEL, Mr. ANDERSON Of Illinois, Mr. EDGAR,Mr. CONABLE, Mr. MCKINNEY, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. FINDLEY) submittedthe following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules# RESOLUTION1 Resolved, That the report of the Select Committee on2 Intelligence, filed on January 29, 1976, and entitled “Report3 of the Investigation of the United States Intelligence Agen-4 cies and Activities” shall be referred to the Committee on5 House Administration, and such committee shall follow the6 procedures agreed to between the Select Committee on7 Intelligence and the President (a summary of which appears8 beginning at page H289 of the daily edition of the Con-9 gressional Record for January 26, 1976) with respect to10 the disclosure of classified information transmitted to such11 select committee. After such procedures have been complied12 with, such report, as may be altered in accordance with13 such procedures, shall be printed as a House document.V![ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED DATE 1/19/01 BY SP2ALMKP]NW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 216
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 216]
# 94TH CONGRESS2D SESSION H. RES. 1074# RESOLUTIONTo provide for the speedy printing and publica-tion of the report of the Select Committeeon Intelligence.By Mrs. FENWICK, Mr. FRENZEL, Mr. ANDERSONof Illinois, Mr. EDGAR, Mr. CONABLE, Mr.MCKINNEY, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. FINDLEYMARCH 4, 1976Referred to the Committee on RulesNW 88326 Docld:32989603 Page 217
[124-10183-10279_multirif_redacted.pdf — page 217]
# UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT## MemorandumTO : Mr. T. W. LeavittFROM : E. C. PetersonSUBJECT: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE REPORTON MAIL INTERCEPT PROGRAMS1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz1 - Mr. T. W. Leavitt1 - Mr. E. C. Peterson1 - Mr. W. O. GregarDATE: 3/5/761 - Mr. J. W. Johnson(copy 2/26/76 memo attached)Memorandum sets forth the results of a review of the Senate Select Committee (SSC) report dealing with mail intercept programs.On 3/4/76, the report prepared by Mr. James Dick of the SSC Staff concerning the mail intercept programs operated by the CIA and the FBI was reviewed by SA James W. Johnson. The report was reviewed to determine if the changes set forth in the memorandum from W. A. Branigan to Mr. W. R. Wannall dated 2/26/76, had been done. The review indicated the revisions agreed to between Mr. James Dick, SSC, and Mr. James P. Lee, had been done.ACTION: For information.62-1163951 - 105-288406ALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDHEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIEDDATE 1/19/01 BY SP2ALMKP