Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 44]
# PERSON OR PROPER.114. EX. COPIES 15, DIST. 16. DEAT 17. R.A.    1 3018. COMPLAINANT'S OCCUPATION AND HRS EN/A19. DESCRIBE LOCATION OR TYPE OF PREMISE▷ CHILE EMBASSY20. VEHICLE USED TAS NO. AND STATEN/A21. YEAR MAKE MODEL COLOR(S)AO-OWNER R-REPORTING PERSONCODE: C-COMPLIANT P-PARENT, GUAR22. NAME (Last, First, Maddie)▷ NAVARRO, HERNAN23. Administrative CounEMBASSY OF Crike3. STREET ADDRESS1736 MASS. Ave W.W.OYEC 5. WHERE EMPLOYED OR SCHOOL ATTE GN/A7. SEX RACE DOS 8. CRIMEN/A9. LOCATION OF CRIME (Address)BURG. II1736 MASS. Ave N..11. WEAPON, TOOL, FORCE OR MEANS USEDONK12. METHOD USEDUNKCODE RES. ADDRESS4. HOME PROTEN/A6. BUS. FIONE785-1744A10. DATE, DAYTSee Han? ....PHOTOSYESFS13. CLASSIFICATIONSerrig Field, HOME PHONE EUS. PER7605 HAMLETST. VA 321-7171 785-17-24. 25. IDENTIFY SUSPECTS BY NUMBER (Include Home, Address, Sex, Race, Age, Height, Weight, Eyes, Hair, Clothing etc.)    IF ARRESTED GIVE ARREST RUISER AND CHARGE (Omit description if arrested)(1)N/1(2)26. NATURE OF INJURIES AND LOCATION ON BODY20. TRANSPORTED BYN/A30. TYPE OF PROPERTY TAKENUNK33. EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTYinside EmbassyNARRATIVE:27. HOSPITALIZED-WHERE?29. TREATED BY31. LOSS VALUEUNK34. POINT OF ENTRY 35. VEHICLE FROM TAG NO. STATE YEAR AND MAKE    WHICH THEFT    OCCURREDUNKN/A(1) CO: TINUATIONS OF ABOVE ITEMS TEE KICLUDE CALPEDISLINED FOOVE. (2) ERMEFLY DESCRISE INCIDENT AND ACTION TAKEN. (3) DESCRICE CIDEREPROPERTY INDICATE DISPOSITION AND DESCRIBE ALL FROPERTY INVOLVED. USE CONTINUATIC REPORT IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED. RECORD VALUE OF LOSS ESTIMATED SY VICTI....ITEM NO.R-1 Reports Betivcen The flours of 1600, 5-15-72 And 0855,5-15-72 The Embassy of chile was entered And ALL THEOFFICES RANSAKel, UNKNOWN WhatWAS TO KEN AT THISFuLL Report To Follow Aster.CAU 244 SGT GILLON Scene,Print CRU 735 On SceneOFF LEITZ OF EP.S. NOTIFIED AT 1530.hrsc9391T.T. NUMBERDATE & TIME THIS REPORT5-15-72 50039. REPORTING OFFICER UNIT & BADGE 1:0. 40. STATUS (Check Cac) UNFOUNDED    Ms.KurdikLA 503770 X OPEN CLOSED SUSPENDED43. SECOND GFFICER UNIT & BADGE NO.B.L. DUNNINGPD 251 RLVISŁO 3//144. SUPERVISOR APPROVINC    UNIT & BADGE NO.STT C. O. Gil 1947OFFICE USE ONLY37. DATE/TIME TYPE NO. 38. FEPRODUCI UIT REFERRED 1015. REVIEWER42. UCR DISFCS:-00379METROPOLITAN COLICE ADDTIENT WASHINGTON I
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 45]
OGC 73-093025 May 1973MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT: Identity 61 Break In on 15 May 19721. On 24 May 1973 I telephoned Mr. James Robinson, General Crime Section, Department of Justice and asked if hẹ had any information as to criminal prosecution of persons involved in a break in at Identity 61 in Washington, D. C. on 15 May 1972. Mr. Robinson stated he had no knowledge of this but suggested that it would be better to check with Mr. G. Marvin Gentile, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Security, Department of State, and the Secret Service since they had responsibilities for the Executive Protective Service (EPS). I telephoned Mr. Gentile and he identified two State Department cables relative to the incident; one from the embassy in Santiago to the Department, No. 2450, dated 15 May 1972, Subject: Unauthorized Entry Outlining the Protest of the Iden 76 Government presented to the American Embassy, and the State Department reply to Santiago, No. 084655, dated 15 May 1972. Mr. Gentile also identified the EPS report of investigation and suggested that I get a copy from the Secret Service. I then called Mr. Tom Kelly at Secret Service and he had his liaison man deliver me a copy of the EPS report of investigation.2. On 25 May 1973 I received a call from FBI Agent Ray Mullens on green phone No. 5303 stating that he had received a telephone call from Mr. James Robinson relative to my inquiry about prosecution. Mr. Mullens indicated that the FBI Washington Field Office had recontacted the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) on 24 May and reviewed the report No. 248-424 filed with the 3rd District, MPD which states that a break in occurred at Identity 61 between 5:00 and 8:00 a.m. on 15 May 1972.
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 46]
Reported loss at tha me consisted of four am/fmadiosand one electric razor. The police investigation identifiedsome latent fingerprints but no identification of those printswas made. Since the reported loss was under $5,000 and therewas. no evidence of a crossing of state boundries, the FBI didnot make an investigation of the incident. The MPD reportedthat there had been no prosecution and no suspect was identified.![signature of JOHN K. GREANEY, Assistant General Counsel]JOHN K. GREANEYAssistant General Counselcc: Legislative CounselInspector GeneralOGC:JKG:cavOrig - Subject: Watergate Case1 - JKG Signer1 - Chrono-2-00385
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 47]
# SECRET/SENSITIVEEYES ONLY1. June 1973MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. William E. ColbySUBJECT: Special Activities1. Following our recent conversation, I have searched my memory and Mr. McCone's files for examples of activities which to hostile observers or to someone without complete knowledge and with a special kind of motivation could be interpreted as examples of activities exceeding CIA's charter. JPK(1)(B)2. First, as we discussed, on 7 March 1962, DCI McCone, under pressure from Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, agreed to tap the telephones of columnists Robert S. Allen and Paul Scott in an effort to identify their sources for classified information which was appear- ing in their columns. Because the primary source appeared to be in the Department of Defense, McCone ordered me personally to brief General Joe Carroll, Director of DIA, orally, which I did. I understand more complete information on this operation is available from the Director of Security. I, personally, managed to avoid gaining any knowledge of what precise actions were taken, what information was gained, what was done with it, and when the operation was terminated.3. As a result of a developing relationship with IDEN-122 theIDEN-123representative in Washington, and also as a result of certain information conveyed by IDEN-124 , James Angleton, with the approval of Dick Helms, agreed to mount a counterespionage operation against the IDEN-95 in Washington. This involved breaking and entering and the removal of documents from![stamp](2.3, IMPDET CL BY 007789)00457
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 48]
# EYES ONLY2the IDEN-126 On 18 June 1962, DCI McCone and Helms briefed Secretary of State Rusk generally.on the operation without going into operational details. Later on the same day, President John F. Kennedy was briefed. Actual breaking and entering occurred, somewhat later, and on 15 April 1963, DCI McCone met with President Kennedy alone and briefed the President on the details of this new phase of the operation. On the same day, the Attorney General was briefed and he agreed that he would not mention it to the FBI unless the FBI themselves raised it with him. On 3 February 1964, DCI McCone met alone with President Lyndon B. Johnson and briefed him on the operation. On 4 February MeGeorge Bundy was briefed. On 6 February 1964 in a briefing of Secretary of State Rusk on the results of the operation, Rusk expressed reservations about the propriety of such an operation. He raised this same concern in subsequent conversations with McCone on 17 April 1964, 28 May 1964, and 14 June 1964. On 12 September 1964 Rusk continued to express grave reservations and repeatedly suggested that the IDEN-95 be informed directly that we knew about their espionage operations in the United States and ask them to desist. In a meeting on 28 May 1964 Rusk expressed these reservations in the presence of DCI MeCone and President John F. Kennedy. Secretary of Defense McNamara was also present, and there is no record that he had previously been made aware of this operation.4. Although certain activities never got beyond the planning stage, there are, I believe, three examples of such planning which could be subject to misinterpretation. One involved chemical warfare operations against the rice crops in both Cuba and North Vietnam. A second involved a paramilitary strike against the Chi-Com nuclear installations. Outside the United States Government, General Eisenhower was briefed on such planning. A third, which assumes a new significance today, involved a proposal by Angleton and Helms for a greatly increased intelligence collection effort against foreign installations in this country. This planning also involved a scheme for selected
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 49]
# SECRETA//SENSITIVEEYES ONLY3exposure of KGB activities and counteractions against the Soviet intelligence service. The reasons are still unclear to me as to why the FBI chose to brief the PFIAB to the effect that CIA was planning to wiretap extensively and indiscriminately in this country, to greatly increase the Agency representation in the Moscow Embassy and generally to use KGB-type tactics, also extensively and indiscriminately. This led to a heated exchange between DCI McCone and Mr. Belmont of the FBI, one such meeting taking place in the presence of the Attorney General. It is clear that the FBI was opposed to any such proposal then, as now, and the plan never went forward.5. During the period when Des FitzGerald was in charge of the Cuban Task Force, DCI McCone's office learned, quite by accident, that FitzGerald had secured the cooperation of several prominent US business firms in denying economic items to Cuba. There was no question but that the businessmen were glad to cooperate, but knowledge of this operation had to be rather widespread.6. On 17 April 1964, Mr. Robert B. Anderson came to DCI McCone on behalf of American business interests, offering to insert some $300,000 to try to secure a favorable result in the elections in Panama. Shortly after this approach IDEN-128 made a similar proposal to McCone in connection with elections in Chile. On 12 May 1964 at a meeting of the 303 Committee, it was decided that the offers of American business could not be accepted, it being neither a secure way nor an honorable way of doing such business. This declaration of policy at this time bears on the recent ITT hearings, but I am not surprised that McCone has forgotten that he helped to set the precedent of refusing to accept such collaboration between the Agency's operations and private business.7. At the direction of Attorney General Robert Kennedy and with the explicit approval of President Kennedy, McCone injected the Agency, and particularly IDEN-36
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 50]
# Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National ConventionSUMMARY:There is little new evidence of foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, or take advantage of actions designed to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in San Diego, 21 to 23. August 1972. The Students for a Democratic Society, in joining the ranks of domestic groups planning actions at the Republican Convention, has adopted a proposal to cooperate with Mexican workers and students in a demonstration in Tijuana, Mexico, during the Convention. The San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC), another domestic group targetting on the Convention, has received a letter of solidarity from the North Vietnamese. The letter is of interest as an indication of North Vietnamese contact with the SDCC; such contact will be required for the SDCC to implement its earlier-reported plans for broadcasts over public address systems during the Convention of live telephone calls from the Vietnamese in Paris.DEVELOPMENTS:At its recent convention in Cambridge, Massachusetts, held 30 March to 2 April 1972, the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) adopted a proposal to hold demonstrations at the San Diego-Tijuana border during the Republican National Convention. The proposal included a call for SDS to cooperate with Mexican workers and students in an action to occur during a fiesta in Tijuana, where Convention delegates will be entertained.The North Vietnamese have given their endorsement to the San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC) in the form of a letter from the Vietnam Committee for Solidarity with the American People (VCSWAP), a quasi-official organ of the North Vietnamese Government. The letter, which has been circulated by the SDCC and is dated 27 January 1972, expresses "great delight" with the formation of the SDCC, and conveys the Committee's "best wishes of militant solidarity and friendship." The VCSWAP requests that the SDCC write often and "send us materials you have."
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 51]
# CONTROLLED DISSEM23 MAY 1972Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention## SUMMARY:Indications remain limited of foreign plans or attempts to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida, 21-23 August 1972. A member of the Swedish Committee for Vietnam, who is also a member of the Secretariat of the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam, has stated that the U.S. National Elections are playing a role in the Swedish Committee's work. The British-based International Confederation for Disarmament and Peace (ICDP) has distributed a "Spring Offensive Calendar" of activities in the United States against the war based on a submission by the Peoples' Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ). The calendar includes actions planned in connection with the Republican Convention.## DEVELOPMENTS:In mid-April 1972, a member of the Swedish Committee for Vietnam, who is also an influential and well-informed staff member of the Secretariat of the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam, stated in a private discussion of the Swedish Committee's unusually heavy work load that "things will be hectic right until the elections in the U.S."The International Confederation for Disarmament and Peace, a British-based antiwar organization and one of the more prominent member organizations of the Stockholm Conference, has attached a "Spring Offensive Calendar" to the April-May 1972 issue of its regular international publication Vietnam International. The calendar had been furnished by the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and included the following entry:August 21-23 Republican Convention, San Diego.Demonstrations organized by the San Diego Convention Coalition, Box 8267, San Diego, Ca. 92103.
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 52]
CONTROLLED DISSEMThe ICDP commentary on the PCPJ calendar urges demonstrations in support of some of the dates listed but does not specifically call for actions in connection with the Republican Convention.CONTROLLED DISSEM00553
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 53]
14 JUN 1972.Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disruptor Harass the Republican National ConventionSUMMARY:The only new indication of foreign plans or effortsto inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designedto disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention inMiami, Florida, 21-23 August 1972, is an expression ofinterest by a member of the North Vietnamese Delegation tothe Paris Peace Talks in the plans of the major antiwarorganizations in the United States for demonstrations inconnection with the political conventions of both majorparties.DEVELOPMENTS:In mid-May 1972, a member of the North VietnameseDelegation to the Paris Peace Talks invited a visitor tocontact him again when the visitor returned from an imminenttrip to the United States. The North Vietnamese officialgave the visitor the New York City addresses of the People'sCoalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and the NationalPeace Action Coalition (NPAC), and asked the visitor toinquire at their offices regarding their plans for demonstra-tions during the coming summer. The North Vietnameseofficial stated that he was especially interested in plansfor actions in connection with the Democratic and RepublicanNational Conventions.
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 54]
Controlled Dissem28 JUN 1972## Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National ConventionThere are no additional indications of any substantial foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, or take advantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican Party in Miami, Florida, 21-24 August 1972.No Foreign Dissem/No Dissem AbroadControlled Dissem00560
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 55]
# CONTROLLED DISSEM26 JUL 1972Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National ConventionSUMMARY:New indications of foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, influence, or exploit activities designed to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida, 21-24 August 1972, consist of the following: A leader of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) has stated that demonstrations will be organized to take place at United States and allied military installations abroad during the period immediately before and during the Republican Convention. The PCPJ leader also stated that representatives of the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam will participate in activities in connection with the Convention. The Anti-War Union (ABU), a domestic organization which has been active in planning demonstrations in connection with the Republican National Convention, has sent a delegation to Paris, France, to meet with officials of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG). No information is presently available, however, indicating that actions at the Republican Convention have been discussed at these meetings.DEVELOPMENTS:In an early July 1972 meeting with prominent members of foreign antiwar organizations, a representative of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ), who occupies an important position within that organization, discussed the plans of the PCPJ in connection with the upcoming election campaign in the United States. The PCPJ representative stated that during the period 14-23 August, a "Peoples Campaign Against Bombing" would be waged in U.S. cities involved in the manufacture and shipping of materials for use in Vietnam, and that similar actions will be organized at United States and allied military installations abroad. The PCPJ representative further stated that "dramatic demonstrations" in protest00552![photo of warning notice]![photo of controlled dissem notice]![photo of classified by notice]
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 56]
# CONTROLLED DISSENof the bombing in Vietnam are being organized by the "Republican Party National Convention Coalition" to occur on21 August 1972. In an apparent reference to the 21 Augustactions, the PCPJ leader added that representatives of theStockholm Conference on Vietnam will speak on the subject ofthe alleged American bombing of dikes in North Vietnam.(Comment: We have no present information concerning plans ofStockholm Conference representatives to travel to the UnitedStates during the Republican National Convention; nor do wehave any additional information concerning plans of StockholmConference representatives to participate in activities con-nected with the Republican Convention.)The Anti-War Union (AMU), a domestic group engaged inorganizing counter-activities at the Republican National Con-vention, has sponsored the travel of a delegation of activiststo Paris, France, to meet with officials of the DemocraticRepublic of North Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolu-tionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG). An advance partyhas already met with DRV and PRG representatives to discussthe agenda for meetings with the full AKU delegation. Althoughno information is presently available indicating that actionsat the Republican Convention have been discussed or are sched-uled to be discussed at meetings between the AMU delegationand the DRV/PRG officials, it is known that members of the ASUadvance party have asked for advice from the PRG officialsregarding the stance the ANU should take on certain questionsrelating to the presidential elections. It is also knownthat the DRV officials have questioned the ANU advance partyabout the political mood in the United States. One of theAWU delegation. members has stated that upon their return tothe United States about 26 July 1972, some of the memberswill speak at rallics, over the radio, and on television,to "educate the American people about the consequences ofvoting for Nixon, and the need to end the war and defeatNixon." The delegation member added that the demonstrationsat the Republican Convention will be "unique."# CONTROLLED DISSENKO FORCICI DISSED CIGSEN ABROAD00502
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 57]
# Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention2 AUG 1972## SUMMARY:There are no new indications of specific foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, influence, or exploit activities designed to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida, 21-24 August 1972. Although meetings have been held recently in Paris, France, between American antiwar activists and representatives of the Democratic Republic of North Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG), currently available information indicates that the DRV/PRG officials made no efforts to encourage or give guidance to the American participants with respect to the upcoming Republican National Convention. Private discussions, separate from the meetings with the entire American délegation, were conducted by both the DRV and the PRG officials; at present, we have no information regarding the substance of these private exchanges. A second group of activists, considered more important than the first delegation, is scheduled to travel to Paris on or about 1 August 1972 for further consultations with the PRG and DRV representatives.## DEVELOPMENTS:In recent meetings in Paris, France, with members of an American delegation sponsored by the Anti-War Union (AWU), representatives of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG) were very guarded with respect to discussing activities at the Republican National Convention. Although the Vietnamese repeatedly questioned the Americans concerning the mood of the antiwar movement in the United States, they made no direct reference to the Republican Convention, except for one instance when PRG Deputy Chief Nguyen Van TIEN accused President Nixon of using the private and public sessions of the Paris peace talks as "propaganda for the Republican Convention." TIEN then urged the Americans to promote and propagandize the Seven Point Plan offered by the PRG. The Americans, too, for the most part, refrained from discussing the Convention, other than to estimate that demonstrators will number about 10,000 at the Convention.
[124-10185-10099.pdf — page 58]
CONTROLLED DISSEMFollowing their meeting on 22 July 1972 with the AWU delegation, the PRG officials held additional talks with sub-groups of the delegation. Additionally, at least one of the American participants was invited by the DRV officials to return for further discussions. At present, there is no information available concerning the substance of these private exchanges.A second, more important delegation of Americans connected with the Anti-War Union is scheduled to travel to Paris circa 1 August 1972 for further consultation with DRV and PRG representatives. This second group is scheduled to be led by Rennie DAVIS, founder and leader of the AWU. This will be DAVIS' second trip to Paris within recent months for discussions with DRV and PRG representatives. Upon his return from his first trip, DAVIS publicly stated that the AWU would demonstrate at both the Democratic and the Republican Convention, but that the AWU's chief target would be the Republican Convention.00564CONTROLLED DISSEM