Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 114]
CONFIDENTIAL15 May 1973MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT: Break-in at Identity 611. Information has been received from WH Division which indicates that there was a break-in at Identity 61 on the weekend of 13-14 May 1972. The Iden 76 Desk of WH Division has no knowledge of Bureau coverage at that time.2. I discussed the Iden 76 matter with Iden 66 of CI Staff (Red 1731), who advised that the FBI did have coverage of Identity 61, and the Agency supported this operation. He indicated that this was identified as Operation WUDOOR and he would be able to provide additional details on this if Mr. Colby requests it./s/ Identity 10Acting Executive OfficerCONFIDENTIALE2 IMPDETCL BY 008246 00373NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 115
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 115]
8 MAR 1973MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for OperationsSUBJECT: WII Comments on Jack Anderson ColumnREFERENCE: Jack Anderson's Washington Merry-Go-Round Column of S March 1972: "Chilean Break-ins Reflect watergate"1. WII Division has reviewed the referenced column (copy attached) by Jack Anderson and finds that it contains no new information. To the best knowledge of the Division, there is no foundation to the allegation that 2. Howard Hunt was engaged on behalf of ITT in breaking into Chilean diplomatic installations in Washington and New York.2. Any connection between ITT and these break-ins is purely conjectural and the column takes care to point this out.3. Harold Hendrix, ITT Latin American representative, has told us that he had no relationship with Hunt on this or any ITT matter. He had anticipated that Anderson might inply such a relationship in his column and had assured us that this was not true./s/ Identity 81ChiefWestern Hemisphere DivisionAttachment: As Stated
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 116]
# EALCUTIVE PROTECTIVE SERVICE INCIDENT REPORTUSSS-EPS FORM 1016/701. SERIAL (CASE) ÅMBER   F-72-3982. DATE OCCUR: 3. HOUR OCC:   5-13-72-05-15-72 1300 hrs.4. LOCATION (NATION)   Chile5. NATURE OF INCIDENT   Burglary It6. REPORTED BY:   Hernan Navarro7. ADDRESS   1706 Hamlet Street, Springfield, Va.8. HOME PHONE   321-71229. OFFICE PHONE   785-171610. OFFICE ASSIGNED    Sergeant Stevens E. Eutler    Sergeant Riley M. Richardson11. DATE    05-15-7212. HOUR    1330 hrs.13. DAY OF WEEK    (1) (2) 3 4 5 6 (7)    (S) (M) T W T F (S)14. WITNESS    N/A15. ADDRESS    N/A16. HOME PHONE    N/A17. OFFICE PHONE    N/A18. WITNESS    N/A19. ADDRESS    N/A20. HOME PHONE    N/A21. OFFICE PHONE    N/A22. DETAILS OF INCIDENT (BRIEFLY DESCRIBE INCIDENT. CONTINUE ABOVE ITEMS AS NECESSARY INDICATING ITEM)At approximately 1330 hours, Monday, May 13, 1972, Foreign Missions Division-Control Center was advised by M.P.D.C., 3D, that a burglary had taken place at the Chancery of Chile, 1736 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., sometime between 1600 hours on Friday, May 13, 1972, and on 0855 hours this date.Sergeant Riley M. Richardson and the undersigned were dispatched at approximately 1335 hours in Cruiser # 23.The undersigned was advised by Mr. Hernan (MIT) Navarro, Administrative Counselor of the Embassy of Chile, that the Chancery of Chile was entered and all the offices were ransacked. At this time the method of entry or items taken is unknown.Mr. Navarro advises that he will contact the Foreign Missions Division-Watch Command when determination of missing articles is made. (continued)23. PHOTOS    ☐ YES    FS#Jam(USE EPS FORM 102 - SUPPLEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS)24. SUSPECT AND/OR ARRESTED PERSONS. IDENTIFY BY NAME, ADDRESS, SEX, RACE, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, DOB, EYES, ETC.LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE ADDRESS(1) RACE SEX HEIGHT WEIGHT HAIR EYES DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NO. NATIONAL.LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE ADDRESS(2) RACE SEX HEIGHT WEIGHT HAIR EYES DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NO. NATIONAL:25. ARREST PD 26. ARREST NO. 27. ARREST OFFICER (NAME AND BADGE NO.) 28. DATE OF ARREST 29. MO30. INCIDENT STATUS    A. OPEN    B. CLOSED    C. ☐ UNFOUNDED    D. ☐ CLEARED BY ARREST31. REPORTING OFFICER (SIGNATURE), HOUR    Sergeant Stevens E. ButlerDATE05-15-72HOUR1500 hrs.32. APPROVING OFFICIAL (SIGNATURE)    Captain Pete N. ManthesDATE05-15-72HOUR150033. STATE DEPT. OFFICIAL NOTIFIED    N/A34. USSS-ID CASE NO.    N/A    00376NW 88296 DocId:32989624 Page 117
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 117]
INCIDENT REPORT - SUPPLEN1. SERIAL (CASE) A.EE-   FE-72-3982. NATURE OF INCIDENT## Burglary II3. REPORTED BY:   Hernan (MT) Navarro4. ADDRESS:   7605 Hamlet Street, Springfield, Va5. HOVE P-CE   321-71276. OFICE   765-11167. ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF INCIDENT:   The following were previously on the scene: Sergeant Clifton O. Gill, Badge # 147,   M.P.D.C.,3D, and Officer Michael S. Kurdilla, Badge # 3770, M.P.D.C., 3D, also M.P.D.   Print Cruiser # 735.S/A Michael F. Murphy, USSS-PID (Foreign Branch), was notified.![unclear image of signature]8. SUSPECT AND/OR ARRESTED PERSONS. IDENTIFY BY NAME, ADDRESS, SEX, RACE, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, DOB, EYES, ETC.   N/A9. ARREST PO10. ARREST NO.11. ARREST OFFICER (NAME & BADGE NO.)12. DATE13. Hコン14. CURRENT CASE DISPOSTION15. USSS-ID CASE Nว.    N/A16. FINAL CASE DISPOSITION    OPEN0037717. REFFING OFFICER (SIGNATURE)    ![signature of Sergeant Stevens E. Butler]    Sergeant Stevens E. Butler    NW-88296-Doeld:32989624-Page-1-18-18. DATE    05-15-7219. ΑΡΚΟVED SIGNATURE & TITLE)    ![signature of Captain Pete N. Manthos]    Captain Pete N. Manthos20. DITE    05-1-
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 118]
## NATURE OF INCIDENTBurglary II## REPORTED BY:Herman (PST) Navarro## ADDRESS7605 Hamlet Street, Springfield, ValAt approximately 1600 hours, Tuesday, May 16, 1972, Mr. Havarro contacted Officer Adrian Forman -Gonzalez as 1310 L. Street, H.W. and stated the following items missing: (4 Portable Radios), one (1) Sanyo AM/FM Portable Radio, two (2) Panasonic AM/FM Radi and one (1) Westinghouse AM/FM/SW Radio. Also taken was one (1) Braun Electric Shaver, one (1) Womens pullover sweater, and an unknown number of books.8. SUSPECT AND/OR ARRESTED PERSONS, IDENTIFY BY NAME, ADDRESS, SEX, RACE, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, DOB, EYES, ETC.   N/A| .LAST NAME || - - - || RACE || FIRST || - - - || SEX || .MIDDLE || - - - || HEIGHT || ADDRESS; || - - - || WEIGHT || HAIR || - - - || EYES || DATE OF BIRTH || - - - || SOCIAL SECURITY NO. || HATIGNALITY || - - - || || .LAST NAME || - - - || RACE || FIRST || - - - || .SEX. || MIDDLE || - - - || HEIGHT || ADDRESS || - - - || WEIGHT || KAIR || - - - || EYES || DATE OF BIRTH || - - - || SOCIAL SECURITY NO. || .NATIONALIT: || - - - || |9. ARREST PD 110. ARREST KO.11. ARREST OFFICER (HAME & BAGGE NO.112. DATE13. HOUR14. CURRENT CASE DISPOSTIONA.OPENB.CLOSEDC.UNFOUNDEDD. CLEARED BY ARREST15. USSS-ID CASE NO.    N/A16. FINAL CASE DISPOSITIONOPEN0037817. REFOPTING CEEICER (SIGNAT۱۰ جز    Aff Bill El    Sergeant Stevens E. Butler18. DATE    05-15-72IS. APPROVED (SIGNATURE & TITLE)Fite Whia ThisCaptain Pete N. Manthos20. DATE    05-15-71NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 119
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 119]
# PERSON OR PROPER..14. EX. COPIES 15. DIST.    1 3016. DEAT 17. R.A.18. COMPLAINANT'S OCCUPATION AND HRS E    N/A19. DESCRIBE LOCATION OR TYPE OF PREMISE    ► Chile Embassy20. VEHICLE USED TAS NO. AND STATE    N/A21. YEAR MAKE MODEL COLOR(S)    ACODE: O-OWNER R-REPORTING PERSONC-COMPLAINANT P-PARENT, GUAR22. NAME (Last, First, M.ddie)    ► NAVARRO, HERNAN23. MINISTAstive COUNSPLEN24. 25. IDENTIFY SUSPECTS BY NUMBER (Include Name. Address, Sex, Race, Age, Height, Weight, Eyes, Hair, Clothing etc.)    IF ARRESTED GIVE ARREST NUMSER AND CHARGE (Omit description if arrested)    (1)    N/A    (2)26. NATURE OF INJURIES AND LOCATION ON BODY27. HOSPITALIZED-WHERE?    N/A28. TRANSPORTED EY    N/A30. TYPE OF PROPERTY TAKEN    UNK33. EXACT LOCATION OF PROPERTY    Inside Embassy36. NARRATIVE:ITEMNO.Embassy of Chile3. STREET ADDRESS   1736 MASS. Ave N.W.OYED 5. WHERE EMPLOYED OR SCHOOL ATIE GN/A7. SEX RACE DOB 8. CRIME   Burg. II9. LOCATION OF CRIME (Address)   1736 MASS, Ave N.W.11. WEAPON, TOOL, FORCE OR MEANS USED    UNK12. METHOD USED    UNKCODE RES, ADDRESSR 7605 HAMLETST. Springfield, VA29. TREATED BY    N/A31. LOSS VALUE    UNK32. TRADEMARKS, ACTIONS OR CONVERSATION OF SUSPECT    N/A34. POINT OF ENTRY 35. VEHICLE FROM TAG NO, STATE YEAR AND MAKE    UNK    N/A(1) CONTINUATIONS OF ABOVE ITEMS TE ECLUDECALESLINED ADOVE. (2) BRIEFLY DESCRIGE INCIDENT AND ACTION TAKEN. (3) DESCRICE CIDENCE ANPROPERTY INDICATE DISPOSITION AND DESCRIBE ALL FROPERTY INVOLVED. USE CONTINUATICPORT IFMORE SPACE IS NEEDED. RECORD VALUE OF LOSS ESTIMATED BY VICTI!...R-1 Reports BetuceN The hours of 1600, 5-15-72 ANCd 0855,5-15-72 The Embrissy of Chihe was entered And ALL たWASOFFICES RANSAKE, UNKNOWN WHATWAS TOKEN AT THIS IFuLL Report To Follow hoster.CAU 294/ SgT GILLON Scene,Print CRU 735 On SceneOFF LEITZ OF E.P.S. Notified at 1330.ArseOFFICE USE ONLY37. DATE/TIME TYPE NO. 33. FREPRO    9591    T.T. NUMBER    DATE & TIME THIS REPORT    5-15-72 150039. REPORTING OFFICER UNIT & PADGE 1:0. 40. STATUS Check Cre) UNFOUNDED    Ms. Kurdilla 30 3770 X OPEN CLOSED SUSPENDED43. SECOND OFFICER UNIT & BADGE NO.    B.L. DUNNINGCE UIT REFERRED 1042. UCR DISFOSIT44. SUPERVISOR APPROVING    UNIT & BADGE NO.    SGT C. O. GILL 19/745. REVIEWER    00379PD RLVISEO 3//1METROPOLITAN POLICE NEDERTIENT WASHINGTON DNW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 120
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 120]
OGC 73-093025 May 1973MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDSUBJECT: Identity 61 Break In on 15 May 19721. On 24 May 1973 I telephoned Mr. James Robinson,   General Crime Section, Department of Justice and asked if he   had any information as to criminal prosecution of persons involved   in a break in at Identity 61 in Washington, D.C. on   15 May 1972. Mr. Robinson stated he had no knowledge of this but   suggested that it would be better to check with Mr. G. Marvin Gentile,   Deputy Assistant Secretary for Security, Department of State, and   the Secret Service since they had responsibilities for the Executive   Protective Service (EPS). I telephoned Mr. Gentile and he identi-   fied two State Department cables relative to the incident; one from   the embassy in Santiago to the Department, No. 2450, dated   15 May 1972, Subject: Unauthorized Entry Outlining the Protest   of the Iden 76 Covernment presented to the American Embassy,   and the State Department reply to Santiago, No. 084655, dated   15 May 1972. Mr. Gentile also identified the EPS report of   investigation and suggested that I get a copy from the Secret Service.   I then called Mr. Tom Kelly at Secret Service and he had his liaison   man deliver me a copy of the EPS report of investigation.2. On 25 May 1973 I received a call from FBI Agent   Ray Mullens on green phone No. 5303 stating that he had received   a telephone call from Mr. James Robinson relative to my inquiry   about prosecution. Mr. Mullens indicated that the FBI Washington   Field Office had recontacted the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)   on 24 May and reviewed the report No. 248-424 filed with the 3rd   District, MPD which states that a break in occurred at Identity 61.   between 5:00 and 8:00 a.m. on 15 May 1972.
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 121]
Reported loss at tha me consisted of four am/fmadiosand one electric razor. The police investigation identifiedsome latent fingerprints but no identification of those printswas made. Since the reported loss was under $5,000 and therewas. no evidence of a crossing of state boundries, the FBI didnot make an investigation of the incident. The MPD reportedthat there had been no prosecution and no suspect was identified.JOHN K. GRANAssistant General Counselcc: Legislative CounselInspector GeneralOGC:JKG:cavOrig - Subject: Watergate Case1 - JKG Signer1 - Chróno-2-NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 12200385
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 122]
# SECRET/SENSITIVEEYES ONLY1. June 1973MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. William E. ColbySUBJECT: Special Activities1.  Following our recent conversation, I have searched my memory and Mr. McCone's files for examples of activities which to hostile observers or to someone without complete knowledge and with a special kind of motivation could be interpreted as examples of activities exceeding CIA's charter.2.  First, as we discussed, on 7 March 1962, DCI McCone, under pressure from Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, agreed to tap the telephones of columnists Robert S. Allen and Paul Scott in an effort to identify their sources for classified information which was appearing in their columns. Because the primary source appeared to be in the Department of Defense, McCone ordered me personally to brief General Joe Carroll, Director of DIA, orally, which I did. I understand more complete information on this operation is available from the Director of Security. I, personally, managed to avoid gaining any knowledge of what precise actions were taken, what information was gained, what was done with it, and when the operation was terminated.3.  As a result of a developing relationship with IDEN-122 theIDEN-123representative in Washington, and also as a result of certain information conveyed by IDEN-124, James Angleton, with the approval of Dick Helms, agreed to mount a counterespionage operation against the IDEN-95 in Washington. This involved breaking and entering and the removal of documents from![stamp] 23007789EYES ONLY00457NW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 123
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 123]
EYES ONLY2the IDEN-126 On 18 June 1962, DCI McCone and Helms briefed Secretary of State Rusk generally.on the operation without going into operational details. Later on the same day, President John F. Kennedy was briefed. Actual breaking and entering occurred somewhat later, and on 15 April 1963, DCI McCone met with President Kennedy alone and briefed the President on the details of this new phase of the operation. On the same day, the Attorney General was briefed and he agreed that he would not mention it to the FBI unless the FBI themselves raised it with him. On 3 February 1964, DCI McCone met alone with President Lyndon B. Johnson and briefed him on the operation. On 4 February McGeorge Bundy was briefed. On 6 February 1964 in a briefing of Secretary of State Rusk on the results of the operation, Rusk expressed reservations about the propriety of such an operation. He raised this same concern in subsequent conversations with McCone on 17 April 1964, 28 May 1964, and 14 June 1964. On 12 September 1964 Rusk continued to express grave reservations and repeatedly suggested that the IDEN-95 be informed directly that we knew about their espionage operations in the United States and ask them to desist. In a meeting on 28 May 1964 Rusk expressed these reservations in the presence of DCI MeCone and President John F. Kennedy. Secretary of Defense McNamara was also present, and there is no record that he had previously been made aware of this operation.4. Although certain activities never got beyond the planning stage, there are, I believe, three examples of such planning which could be subject to misinterpretation. One involved chemical warfare operations against the rice crops in both Cuba and North Vietnam. A second involved a paramilitary strike against the Chi-Com nuclear installations. Outside the United States Government, General Eisenhower was briefed on such planning. A third, which assumes a new significance today, involved a proposal by Angleton and Helms for a greatly increased intelligence collection effort against foreign installations in this country. This planning also involved a scheme for selected
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 124]
EYES CALY3exposure of KGB activities and counteractions against the Soviet intelligence service. The reasons are still unclear to me as to why the FBI chose to brief the PFIAB to the effect that CIA was planning to wiretap extensively and indiscriminately in this country, to greatly increase the Agency representation in the Moscow Embassy, and generally to use KGB-type tactics, also extensively and indiscriminately. This led to a heated exchange between DCI McCone and Mr. Belmont of the FBI, one such meeting taking place in the presence of the Attorney General. It is clear that the FBI was opposed to any such proposal then, as now, and the plan never went forward.5. During the period when Des FitzGerald was in charge of the Cuban Task Force, DCI McCone's office learned, quite by accident, that FitzGerald had secured the cooperation of several prominent US business firms in denying economic items to Cuba. There was no question but that the businessmen were glad to cooperate, but knowledge of this operation had to be rather widespread.6. On 17 April 1964, Mr. Robert B. Anderson came to DCI McCone on behalf of American business interests, offering to insert some $300,000 to try to secure a favorable result in the elections in Panama. Shortly after this approach, IDEN-128 of IDEN-129 made a similar proposal to MeCone in connection with elections in Chile. On 12 May 1964 at a meeting of the 303 Committee, it was decided that the offers of American business could not be accepted, it being neither a secure way nor an honorable way of doing such business. This declaration of policy at this time bears on the recent ITT hearings, but I am not surprised that McCone has forgotten that he helped to set the precedent of refusing to accept such collaboration between the Agency's operations and private business.7. At the direction of Attorney General Robert Kennedy and with the explicit approval of President Kennedy, McCone injected the Agency, and particularly IDEN-36NW_88296_DocId:32989624 Page 125EVER COA00459
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 125]
SECRET/CENSITIVEEYES CILY4into the US labor situation, and particularly to try to ameliorate the quarrel between George Meany and Walter Reuther. IDEN-36 steered a very skillful course in this connection, but the Agency could be vulnerable to charges that we went behind Meany's back, or were somehow consorting with Reuther against Meany's wishes.8. There are three examples of using Agency funds which I know to be controversial. One was the expenditure of money under Project MOSES in securing the release of Cuban Brigade prisoners. Details of this operation are best known to Larry Houston, Mike Miskovsky IDEN-131 , and James Smith. Second, as you well know, when Lou Concin received his summons to report to the Joint General Staff Headquarters on 1 November 1963 a large amount of cash went with him. My impression is that the accounting for this and its use has never been very frank or complete. Third, at one of the early Special Group meetings attended by McCone he took strong exception to proposals to spend Agency funds to improve the economic viability of West Berlin, and for an investment program in Mali. His general position was that such expenditures were not within the Agency's charter, and that he would allow such spending only on the direct personal request of the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense, or the White House.9. I raise these issues of funding because I remember the Agency's being severely criticized by the House Appropriations Subcommittee for having spent $3,000 for stamps in connection with a program to buy tractors to secure the release of prisoners from Cuba.10. Under the heading of old business, I know that any one who has worked in the Director's office has worried about the fact that conversations within the offices and over the telephones were transcribed. During McCone's
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 126]
SECRET/SENSITIVEEYES CALY5tenure, there were microphones in his regular office, his inner office, his dining room, his office in East Building, and his study at his residence on White Haven Street. I do not know who would be willing to raise such an issue, but knowledge of such operations tends to spread, and certainly the Agency is vulnerable on this score.11. Also under the heading of old business, I well remember the hue and cry raised, especially by Carl Kaysen in the White House, when the Agency injected a contaminating agent in Cuban sugar bound for the Soviet Union. Shortly after the Cuban missile crisis, there was a disposition in Washington to reexamine the Bay of Pigs, and the fact that several Alabama National Air Guard officers lost their lives in the Bay of Pigs was surfaced with surprisingly little excitement at the time.12. During my stint on the 7th floor there was a special arrangement with the Office of Communications whereby the Director's office gained access to non-CIA traffic. This surfaced briefly at one point shortly after Admiral Rayborn became DCI. He had visited the Signal Center and removed a copy of a telegram from the Embassy in the Dominican Republic for Under Secretary George Ball, Eyes Only. He returned to his office and proceeded to discuss this telegram with George Ball who was naturally quite curious as to how Rayborn knew about it, and also as to how Rayborn had it in his possession before Ball did. Ben Read in the Secretary of State's office and I spent several weeks putting this one to rest.13. Finally, DCI McCone, as you and I well know, operated on a very lofty plane, and I think certain of his activities could be misunderstood: One example was his decision in July of 1964 to have Aristotle Onassis and Maria Callas flown from Rome to Athens on Air Force KC 135. Their arrival in Athens in this airplane attracted the attention of the local press and in due course Mr. John![image of illegible text]NW 88296 DocId:32989624 Page 12700462
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 127]
EVES ONLY6Hightower, Chief of the Associated Press Bureau for Washington, came to see me to ask about the propriety of this action.14. The use of IDEN-132 aircraft has been remarkably secure, but DCI McCone himself forgot about the cover arrangement and became quite exercised when he saw Candidate Goldwater land in the San Francisco airport for the Republican National Convention in 1964 aboard the IDEN-133 with the highly visible tail number IDEN-134. This was, I explained to him carefully, a perfectly legitimate charter, but he didn't like it.15. McCone dealt quite extensively with newsmen in Washington. In fact, they gave him a gift and a luncheon when he left Washington, which is perhaps indicative of the press's relations with him. However, in the case of the Ross and Wise book, *The Invisible Government*, he did try to bring pressure on the publisher and the authors to change things. They did not change a comma, and I doubt that this old saw will ever sing again.16. Finally, and this will reflect my Middle Western Protestant upbringing, McCone's dealings with the Vatican, including Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI, would and could raise eyebrows in certain quarters.17. The above listing is uneven, but I have a sinking feeling that discipline has broken down, and that allegations from any quarter which cast these things in the wrong light would receive great publicity and attention, and no amount of denial would ever set the record straight. If I may be of any assistance in tracking down further details, I am of course at your disposal, but I would pointNW 88296 Docld:32989624 Page 128
[124-10185-10099_multirif.pdf — page 128]
out that I was very much in the position of the enlisted man who knew that the commissioned officers were aware of these activities and better able to judge their propriety and possible impact or misinterpretation.WelderWALTER ELDER