Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 1]
13-00000SECRETSUBJECT: Courtesy Visit of JFK AssassinationRecords Review Board, 16 October 1996We have succeeded thus far in working out cooperative arrange-ments for resolving differences of opinion as to what informationcan be released to the public and what should be withheld becauseof sensitivities.(U) The Board may also express interest in gaining access torecords that are not part of the JFK records (the sequesteredcollection), but which the Board regards as possibly containinguseful background information or leads for further inquiry. Wehave released some 227,000 pages of relevant Agency records thusfar and are continuing to collaborate with the Board to identifyadditional information that can be released.(U) Suggested Talking Points: You may want to emphasize theAgency's commitment to continuing the very positive relationshipwith the Board, including making people and computer expertiseavailable to process relevant documents.(S) You may want to assure the Board that CIA is determinedto give the Board and designated staff full access to all assas-sination records, as required by the JFK statute. At the same time,it would be helpful to stress that there are certain categories ofsensitive information that require continued protection and shouldnot be released. Among the types of information contained in theJFK records that we need to protect are:- Identities of agents and CIA officers who retired under cover.- The Agency's relationships with liaison services, and information received from foreign governments.- A specific example in this category is the Agency's current request to the Board to protect *the liaison relationship with Australia*, and to withhold documents received *from Australia*.- Need to protect non-official cover.- - The Board is planning at its 15-16 October meeting to review *documents that identify (companies that provided (commercial cover*. We are arranging to have the DO brief the Board on the potential damage to the non-official cover program and *companies* involved if such cover is compromised.2CECD
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 2]
SECRETSUBJECT: Courtesy Visit of JFK Assassination Records Review Board- Locations of certain stations and facilities.-- In this latter connection, the Board is expected to consider at its 15-16 October meeting our request that the *Warrenton Training Center* not be disclosed as a CIA facility.![signature of John F. Pereira]John F. PereiraAttachments:A. Memo to DCI, 13 June 96B. List of Board MembersC. Biographies of Board membersExecutive DirectorGeneral Counsel
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 3]
SECRETSUBJECT: Courtesy Visit of JFK AssassinationRecords Review Board, 16 October 1996DCI/CSI/HRG/JPereira:bas/30373 (8 Oct 96)Distribution:Original - Addressee (w/atts)1 - Executive Registry (w/atts)1 - Executive Director (w/atts)1 - D/CSI (w/atts)1 - C/HRG (w/atts)1 - CSI/Chrono (w/atts)1 - HRG file (w/atts)
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 4]
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYCSI 0327/9613 June 1996MEMORANDUM FOR:Director of Central IntelligenceVIA:Deputy Director of Central IntelligenceExecutive DirectorDirector, Center for the Study of IntelligenceFROM:John F. PereiraChief, Historical Review GroupSUBJECT:Request of JFK Assassination Records Review Board for Courtesy Visit with DCI1. Action Requested: Paragraph 4 below contains a recommendation for your approval. The Chairman of the JFK Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), John Tunheim, has requested that you meet with him and the other four Board members at Headquarters Building some time in the next several months. He asks that the meeting be arranged to coincide with one of their monthly sessions, which are held in Washington. (The schedule of their meetings is attached.) The Board's Executive Director, David Marwell, would also participate.2. Background: Mr. Tunheim, recently appointed a federal judge in Minnesota, would like to provide you with a brief description of the Board's purpose and activities. The Board has paid similar visits to the FBI, where they met with Director Freeh, and to NSA and the Secret Service. The ARRB members were appointed by President Clinton in 1993 as required by statute. Their principal responsibility is to ensure public disclosure of government records related to the assassination of President Kennedy. The statute grants the Board full access to all documents that are related to either the assassination or past investigations into the assassination.3. CIA has worked closely with the Board and its staff from the beginning. The Board's Executive Director and we have worked out cooperative arrangements for resolving differences of opinion as to what information can be released to the public and what should be withheld because of sensitivities. We have released approximately 227,000 pages of relevant Agency records
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 5]
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYSUBJECT: Request of JFK Assassination RecordsReview Board for Courtesy Visit with DCIthus far, and are continuing to collaborate with the Board toidentify additional information that can be released.4. Recommendation: That you agree to meet with the JFK   Assassination Records Review Board at a date to be determined.![signature of John F. Pereira]John F. PereiraAttachments:A: ARRB Meeting ScheduleB: Biographies of Board MembersAPPROVED:Director of Central Intelligence Date2FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 6]
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYSUBJECT: Request for JFK Assassination RecordsReview Board for Courtesy Visit with DCIDCI/CSI/HRG/JPereira: bas/30373 (13 June 96)Distribution:Original - Addressee.1 - Executive Registry1 - DDCI1 - Executive Director1 - D/CSI1 - C/HRG3OFFICIAL USE ONLY
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 7]
Assassination Records Review BoardMembers:Chair: John R. Tunheim (Federal judge, Minnesota)Dr. Henry Graff (Professor Emeritus of History, Columbia University)Dr. Kermit L. Hall (Dean, College of Humanities, Ohio State University)Dr. William L. Joyce (Associate University Librarian, Princeton University)Dr. Anna K. Nelson (Adjunct Professor of History, American University)Dr. David G. Marwell ARRB Executive DirectorDr. T. Jeremy Gunn ARRB General Counsel
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 8]
# Assassination Records Review BoardAssassination Records Review Board600 E Street NW - 2nd Floor - Washington, DC 20530(202) 724-0088 - Fax: (202) 724-0457Assassination Records Review BoardThe Honorable John R. Tunheim, ChairExperienceState of Minnesota, Chief Deputy Attorney General, 1986-PresentState of Minnesota, Office of the Attorney General, Solicitor General, 1985-86State of Minnesota, Office of the Attorney General, Manager, Public Affairs LitigationDivision, 1984-85Law Firm of Oppenheimer, Wolff, Foster, Shepard and Donnelly, Associate Attorney,1981-84Senior U.S. District Judge Earl Larson in Minneapolis, Law Clerk, 1980-81United States Senator Hubert H. Humphrey, Staff Assistant, 1975-77EducationJ.D., University of Minnesota Law School, 1980B.A., Concordia College, 1975Dr. Henry F. GraffExperienceColumbia University, Professor Emeritus of History, 1991- PresentFreedom Forum Media Studies Center, Senior Fellow, 1991-92Columbia University, Department of History, Instructor to Full Professor,1946-91, Chairman, 1961-64EducationPh.D., Columbia University, 1949M.A., Columbia University, 1942B.S., City College, 1941
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 9]
Dr. Kermit L. Hall## ExperienceThe Ohio State University, Dean, College of Humanities, and Professor of History and Law, 1994-PresentThe University of Tulsa, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences and Professor of History and Law, 1992-94University of Florida, Associate/Full Professor of History and Law, 1981-92Wayne State University, Assistant/Associate Professor, Department of History, 1976-81Vanderbilt University, Assistant Professor, Department of History, 1972-76## EducationMaster of Study of Law, Yale University Law School, 1980Ph.D., The University of Minnesota, 1972M.A., Syracuse University, 1967B.A., The University of Akron, 1966Dr. William L. Joyce## ExperiencePrinceton University, Associate University Librarian for Rare Books and Special Collections, 1986-PresentThe New York Public Library, Assistant Director for Rare Books and Manuscripts, 1981-1985American Antiquarian Society, Worcester, Massachusetts, Curator of Manuscripts, 1972-81, Education Officer, 1988-81William L. Clements Library, The University of Michigan, Manuscripts Librarian, 1968-72## EducationPh.D., The University of Michigan, 1974
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 10]
M.A., St John's University (Ν.Υ.), 1966B.A., Providence College, 1964Dr. Anna K. Nelson## ExperienceThe American University, Adjunct Professor of History, 1992-Present, 1986-88Arizona State University, Distinguished Visiting Professor, 1992The American University, Associate Professor in History, 1991Tulane University, Adjunct Associate Professor in History, 1988-90George Washington University, Instructor to Adjunct Associate Professor,1972-85George Washington University, Director, History and Public Policy Program,1980-82## EducationPh.D., George Washington University, 1972M.A., University of Oklahoma, 1956B.A., University of Oklahoma, 1954
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 11]
# DAVID G. MARWELLBiographical InformationOn July 1, 1994, the Berlin Document Center (BDC) was transferred to the German Federal Archives (Bundesarchiv) marking the end of nearly 48 years of American control of this unique organization. With an estimated 25 million Nazi-era personnel-related files, the BDC was once a crucial source of evidence for the Nuremberg Trials and is today an incalculably important source for the study of the Third Reich. The transfer also marked the end of David Marwell's tenure as Director of the BDC.A well-trained scholar with a PH.D. in History, Marwell came to Berlin in 1988 from the Office of Special Investigations (OSI), U.S. Department of Justice where he held the position of Chief of Investigative Research. At OSI, he was involved in researching and preparing cases against accused Nazi war criminals residing in the United States. In addition, he was selected to participate in the Klaus Barbie Investigation (1983) and played a major role in the Josef Mengele investigation (1985), both of which received international attention.In connection with the Joseph Mengele and Klaus Barbie investigations, Marwell was in charge of assembling all relevant documentary evidence relating to any possible connection between these individuals and U.S. institutions or personnel. The investigations were two of the most unusual ever undertaken and through them he gained siginificant experiences in the identifying and locating documentary resources. The former Director of OSI, Allan A. Ryan, Jr., in his book *Quiet Neighbors: Prosecuting Nazi War Criminals in America*, described Marwell as "an experienced and careful historian who could find documents in archives when no one else could."When Marwell arrived at the Document Center, the institution had been rocked by a scandal involving a significant theft of documents. The resulting focus on the Center revealed that it had been neglected in many areas for many years and suffered from an outmoded administrative structure, a disaffected and undertrained staff and a lack of professional guidance. It was Marwell's job to bring the Center up to standard and prepare it for turnover to the German government.The challenges facing Marwell were not only to manage a complex institution (with an annual budget of eight million deutschmarks) and repair past deficiencies, but also to define a future for an institution in transition. He prepared a "five year plan" for the BDC that set five goals, developed a corresponding program to meet each goal, and designed a system to monitor the progress. In achieving all of the goals, Marwell*   Introduced computer technology (there was not a single computer at the BDC when he arrived) and developed a sophisticated, integrated information retrieval system that has been described as a model for archive administration;*   Created a fully professional document conservation and restoration program;*   Developed a staff (50 Germans and 20) Americans
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 12]
T. Jeremy Gunn1652 Wild Pine WayReston. Virginia 20194(703) 481-8196# EDUCATIONPh.D. Harvard University, Committee on the Study of Religion, 1991*Field:* Religion and Society*Affiliation:* Graduate Associate, Center for European Studies*Awards:* French Government Grant; Krupp Foundation Fellow, Gilbert Chinard Award,Institut Français de Washington; Center for European Studies GrantJ.D. Boston University School of Law, 1987. *Magna cum laude**Awards:* Hennessey and Liacos Distinguished ScholarA.M. University of Chicago, General Studies in Humanities, 1978*Award:* University FellowshipB.A. Brigham Young University, International Relations and Humanities, 1974, *High Honors with Distinction* (highest 1%)*Awards:* several scholarships# EMPLOYMENTGeneral Counsel and Associate Director for Research and Analysis, JFK Assassination Records Review Board, Washington, D.C., 1994-presentCovington & Burling, Associate Attorney, Washington, D.C., 1988-94*Practice Areas:* international law (public and private): civil litigation (including class action and other complex cases); appellate (including Supreme Court) litigation; extensive church-state litigation; and six month full-time work in poverty law for Neighborhood Legal Services Corporation.United States District Court, Law Clerk to the Honorable Douglas P. Woodlock, Boston, MA, 1987-88Ropes & Gray, Summer Associate, Boston, MA, 1987Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Summer Associate, Boston, MA, 1986# TEACHING EXPERIENCEHarvard University, Graduate Teaching Fellow, 1980-84Ethics and International Relations (Stanley Hoffmann)Rise of American Power (Emest May)Art and Politics (Simon Schama)
[104-10331-10118.pdf — page 13]
T. Jeremy GunnPage 2Paris and London in the Nineteenth Century (John Clive)Moral Values in European Thought (James Wilkinson)French Society and Politics 1715-1815 (Patrice Higonnet)French Society and Politics 1815-1945 (Patrice Higonnet)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, instructor in History, 1980-81; 1981-82Brigham Young University, Instructor in History and Humanities on overseas study programin Paris, France 1975PUBLICATIONSBookA Standard for Repair. The Establishment Clause, Equality, and Natural Rights (NewYork and London, 1992)Articles"Freedom of Religion or Belief, Ensuring Effective International Legal Protection,"American Journal of International Law (1996) (book review) (forthcoming)"Adjudicating Rights of Conscience Under the European Convention on HumanRights," in Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective: Legal Perspectives(John Witte and Johan van der Vyver, eds., 1996), 305"The Promises We Keep: Human Rights, the Helsinki Process, and AmericanForeign Policy," 88 American Joumal of International Law 854 (1994) (bookreview)"Neutrality, Expression, and Oppression," 23 Journal of Law & Education 391(1994)"Applying Coercion: The Latest Element of Establishment," in Why We NeedPublic Schools: Church/State Relations and Visions of Democracy (Art Must, ed.,1992)RECENT PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIESChair, Committee on Human Rights, District of Columbia Bar (1995-present)Co-Chair, Committee on Public International Law, District of Columbia Bar (1994-95)General Counsel, National Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty (1990-94)Member, Board of Directors, Washington Council of Lawyers (1993-present)International Advisory Board, World Report on Freedom of Conscience and BeliefU.S. Institute of Peace Working Group on Religion, Ideology, and Peace (1994-present)Who's Who of American Lawyers (8th ed.)
[104-10331-10121.pdf — page 0]
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992SECRETOCC-96-08619 NOV 1996MEMORANDUM FOR:John PereiraHistorical Review GroupFROM:Linda A. JasperDeputy Chief, Office of Central Cover.SUBJECT:Response to Questions Posed by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Review Board1. During the OCC briefing of the John F. Kennedy Assassination Review Board on 16 October 1996, members of the Board asked three questions to which OCC said it would respond after additional research. Following are the questions and the responses:a. How many real businesses or contrived facilities in the commercial cover program are connected to the publications industry? Response: A few real businesses are loosely connected with the publications industry, and the names of a few contrived facilities could be perceived as being associated.b. How many companies participated in the commercial cover program in the 1960s, and how many participate today? Response: Approximately 500 companies participated in the commercial cover program in the 1960s, and circa 1,800 are currently in the program.ALL PORTIONS OFTHIS DOCUMENT ARECLASSIFIED SECRETSECRETCL BY 0523550REASON 1.5(c)DECL X1; 12 November 2021DRV COV 2-87
[104-10331-10121.pdf — page 1]
13-00000SECRETSUBJECT: Response to Questions Posed by the John F. KennedyAssassination Review Boardc. Could a copy of the secrecy agreement which is signed bycompany officials participating in the commercial cover programbe made available, and has it changed since the 1960s? Response:Attached is a copy of the secrecy agreement used from 1955 to1988 and a copy of the agreement used from 1988 to the present.The only difference is an addendum on the reverse which was addedin 1991 pursuant to the Treasury, Postal Service and GeneralGovernment Appropriations Act of 1991.2. This memorandum and its attachments are for background   information only and must be returned to the Central Intelligence   Agency after review by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Review   Board.Linda A. JasperAttachment:as statedcc: Fredrick Wickham, IMS2SECRET
[104-10331-10121.pdf — page 2]
SECRETSUBJECT: Response to Questions Posed by the John F. KennedyAssassination Review BoardDC/OCC(lh/Ljasper, 32435 18Nov96 file:jfkboard)Distribution:Orig & 1 - Addressee1 - DC/OCC (Ljasper)1 - His. Review Board (BHarrelson)1 - OCC/EXO (EMathias)1 - OGC (Ciprinai)3SECRET
[104-10331-10121.pdf — page 3]
# SECRECY AGREEMENT1.  I acknowledge the fact that because of the confidential relationship between myself and the U.S. Government, I will be the recipient of information which, in itself, or by the implications to be drawn therefrom, will be such that its unlawful disclosure or loose handling may adversely affect the interest and the security of the United States. I realize that the methods of collecting and of using this information, as well as the identity of persons involved, are as secret as the substantive information itself and, therefore, must be treated by me with an equal degree of secrecy.2.  I shall always recognize that the U.S. Government has the sole interest in all information which I or my organization may possess, compile or acquire pursuant to this understanding. No advantage or gain will be sought by me as a result of the added significance or value such information may have, due to the Government's interest in it.3.  I solemnly pledge my word that I will never divulge, publish, nor reveal either by word, conduct, or by any other means such information or knowledge, as indicated above, unless specifically authorized to do so, by the U.S. Government.4.  Nothing in this understanding is to be taken as imposing any restriction upon the normal business practices of myself or my organization: i.e., information normally possessed by us or gathered in the regular course of business will continue to be utilized in accordance with our normal practices.SIGNATURE:REPRESENTATIVE OF U.S. GOVERNMENTDATESIGNATURE:ORGANIZATIONDATE
[104-10331-10121.pdf — page 4]
# SECRECY AGREEMENT1. I acknowledge the fact that because of the confidential relationship between myself and the U.S. Government, I will be the recipient of information which, in itself, or by the implications to be drawn therefrom, will be such that its unlawful disclosure or loose handling may adversely affect the interest and the security of the United States. I realize that the methods of collecting and of using this information, as well as the identity of persons involved, are as secret as the substantive information itself and, therefore, must be treated by me with an equal degree of secrecy.2. I shall always recognize that the U.S. Government has the sole interest in all information which I or my organization may possess, compile or acquire pursuant to this understanding. No advantage or gain will be sought by me as a result of the added significance or value. such information may have, due to the Government's interest in it.3. I solemnly pledge my word that I will never divulge, publish, nor reveal either by word, conduct, or by any other means such information or knowledge, as indicated above, unless specifically authorized to do so, by the U.S. Government.4. Nothing in this understanding is to be taken as imposing any restriction upon the normal business practices of myself or my organization: i.e., information normally possessed by us or gathered in the regular course of business will continue to be utilized in accordance with our normal practices.SIGNATURE:REPRESENTATIVE OF U.S. GOVERNMENTDATESIGNATUREORGANIZATIONDATE
[104-10331-10121.pdf — page 5]
# ADDENDUMPursuant to the Treasury, Postal Service and General Government Appropriations Act of 1991, the following language shall be incorporated into and considered a part of the attached nondisclosure agreement:"These restrictions are consistent with and do not supersede conflict with or otherwise alter the employee obligations rights or liabilities created by Executive Order 12356; section 7211 of title 5, United States Code (governing disclosures to Congress); section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by the Military Whistleblower Protection Act (governing disclosure to Congress by members of the military); section 2302(b)(8) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by the Whistleblower Protection Act (governing disclosures of illegality, waste, fraud, abuse or public health or safety threats); the Inteliigence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (50 USC 421 et seq.)(gov disclosures that could expose confidential Government agents), and the statutes which protect against disclosure that may compromise the national security, including section. 641,793,794, 798, and 952 of title 18, United States Code, and section 4(b) of the Subversive Activities Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. section 783(b)). The definitions, requirements, obligations, rights, sanctions and liabilities created by said Executive Order and listed statutes are incorporated into this Agreement and are controling."