[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 170]
SECRET(When Filled In)# FITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCE## INSTRUCTIONSFOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organization policy that you show Part I of this report to the employee recent under conditions specified in Regulation 20-370. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing Army question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Personnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in item 8, of Section "A" below.## SECTION A. GENERAL1. NAME SMITH Joseph B.2. DATE OF BIRTH 16 June 19213. SEX M4. SERVICE DESIGNATION DP5. OFFICE/DIVISION/BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENT Manila6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE Ops Officer-Deputy Chief, (PP)7. GRADE GS-138. DATE REPORT DUE IN OP Special9. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates) 15 March-15 May 195810. TYPE OF REPORT (Check one)* Special### SECTION B. CERTIFICATION1. FOR THE RATER: THIS REPORT [X] HAS [] HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN, EXPLAIN WHYA. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:[X] THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.[] THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELF AND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.[] I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES SO THAT HE KNOWS WHERE HE STANDS.B. THIS DATE 19 May 1958C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR William T. TarrantD. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLE Chief, PP2. SHOULD THE REVIEWING OFFICIAL RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR. OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION, WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.BYPosted Nat. ContrelReviewed by PNDI certify that any substantial difference of opinion with the supervisor reflected in the above section.A. THIS DATE 15 May 1958B. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OFFICIAL. George E. AurrellC. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL COS### SECTION C. JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION1. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare him ONLY with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section D.5INSERTRATINGNUMBER.1. DOES NOT PERFORM DUTIES ADEQUATELY. HE IS INCOMPETENT.2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE: ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING. HE OFTEN FAILS TO CARRY OUT RESPONSIBILITIES.3. PERFORMS MOST OF HIS DUTIES ACCEPTABLY. OCCASIONALLY REVEALS SOME AREA OF WEAKNESS.4. PERFORMS DUTIES IN A COMPLIANT, EFFECTIVE MANNER.5. A FINE PERFORMANCE. CARRIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY WELL.6. PERFORMS HIS DUTIES IN SUCH AN OUTSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEW OTHER PERSONS KNOWN TO THE SUPERVISOR.COMMENTS: Subject has proven himself to be an effective and productive case officer.FORM NO. 45 (Part 1) REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF FORMS 45 AND 45A WHICH ARE OBSOLETE.SECRET Performance