[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 172]
# SECRETSECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater responsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for determining future personnel actions.The undersigned's assessment of subject officer continues essentially the same as stated in the previous fitness report.During the 18 months this officer has performed his duties at Tokyo Station he has carried on and, with marked success, built upon the program organized by his predecessor. Subject officer by diligent effort and by demonstrating outstanding competence and expertise in the Factory Marking field has successfully established himself as the focal point for the Factory Markings Collection Program (FMCP) within both the Station and the ODYOKE intelligence community. He has established and maintained excellent working relations with all ODYOKE intelligence components having an interest and/or capability in the FMCP. His status insures the maximum coordinated effort in this field with resultant benefits to the entire intelligence community. The thoroughness and effectiveness with which I believe the FMCP is being carried out in the North Asian area is strong testimonial for the caliber of subject officer's performance.Subject officer has demonstrated high devotion to duty and complete willingness to undertake any task, no matter how difficult or inconvenient, which would contribute to the FMCP. In addition, he has voluntarily undertaken to look after the broader interests of KULYNX with both KUDOVE and ODYCZ military intelligence components in this area. In the performance of his duties subject officer has also displayed a high degree of initiative and self-reliance, as well as mature judgment in assessing the goals of his program and devising and implementing all measures necessary to achieve these.With regard to subject officer's current assignment and performance I have no weaknesses to note. From the point of view of his career development I do recommend further training.(continued)SECTION F CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. |                                                 || ----------------------------------------------- || DATE 14 April 1961                              || 2.                                              || MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN                        || UNDER MY SUPERVISION                            || 18                                              || EMPLOYEE UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYS || OTHER (Specify)                                 || DATE 14 April 1961                              |BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEJerome Fox (Signed)BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONThis report has been prepared in accordance with FE Division standards which[handwritten text]IF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASONREPORT MADE WITHIN LAST 90 DAYSOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR Chier, STSTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE Frank J. Denny3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL*   I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.*   I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.*   I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.*   I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL I am not, of course, as familiar with Subject's work as is the rater, but I cannot help but question what I consider the extremely high ratings given here. True, we have no person performing comparable duties in the station, but we have few, if any, officers here who consistently perform at this high level. In my dealings with Subject, I have been struck by his high motivation and devotion to duty. On the other hand, I have not been favorably impressed by his failure to handle promptly his (cont'd)DATE 14 Apr 1961 OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE Robert P. WheelerSECRET