Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 7]
F. PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDSG. ACCESS CON. LSH. DETECTION SYSTEMSI. TERDICTION (RESPONSE) SYSTEMSJ. DISASTER AND EMERGENCY PLANSK. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCESL. FI..A..CIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTSM. INSPECTION AND TESTINGN. NATIONAL PROTECTION STANDARDSO. PREPARATION OF DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR A REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL TENDERP. PLANNING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL SYSTEM OF INDUSTRIAL SECURITY.3. A COPY OF THIS FIRST SURVEY CAN PROBABLY BE ACQUIRED.4. THE NEW CONTRACT, UNDER DISCUSSION, BUT ALMOST CERTAIN TO BE CONCLUDED, INVOLVES:A. THE SERVICES OF NUMEROUS ON-SITE MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL ADVISORY AND TRAINING PERSONNEL.B. THE IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF DESIGNATED ITEMS OF SECURITY, SAFETY, FIRE PROTECTION AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.C. PROVIDING ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL BIRN AND TRAUMA HOSPITAL, A FIRE DEPARTMENT, A SECURITY CONTROL CENTER, A SAFETY INSPECTION LABORATORY, A TRAINING INSTITUTE, AND AN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY, AND THE SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPPING, AND OPERATION OF THESE FACILITIES.D. PROVIDING DESIGN ENGINEERING PLANS FOR AN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, AS WELL AS THE PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT, INSTALLATION, AND CHECK-OUT OF THE SYSTEME. FURNISHING PRE-FABRICATED MODULA? STRUCTURES TO BE USED AS INTERDE FACILITIES FOR PERSONEL LIVING QUARTERS AS WELL AS OFFICER AND OPERAT COINS QUARTER 3.5. INTEGRAL TO THESE ARRANGENENTS, IS EXTENSIVE STAFFING WITH ON SITE US PERSONNEL WHO WILL DE IN REGILAT CONTACT WITH SONATRACH OFFICIALS AF ALL LEVELS. A LONDON EXECUTIVE PLACEMENT COMPANY WILL HANDLE SOME STAFF SELECTION. THERE WILL BE CONSIDERABLE TRAINING OF ALGER LANS IN THE US, PROBABLY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAJI AND FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY (MIA).6. THE PRECED ING WAS VOLUNTEERED FOR POSSIBLE OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATION ON A VERY PRELIMINARY ASO NONCOMBITAL BASIS. E2   IMPDET CL BY. 011658   SECRETINTERON GRF Y
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 8]
SECRETBruec BerkmansDOMCpe:cJFrench/mv6580513 September 1976SA/DDO281415ATTN: Mr. Anthony GoldinAttached for your information.cc: Copy sent to C/LA/CARIE-2 IMPDET CL BY 906875SECRET
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 9]
SECRET 10140CZ SEP 76 STAFFCITE DCD/MIAMI 13510TO: DCD/HEADQUARTERS.TO: OPERATIONS SERVICES GROUP/OSG (FRENCH) FROM MAINWARINGWNINTELSUBJ: DCD CASE 65805 - BRUCE BERKMANSREF: MAINWARING/FRENCH TELECON OF 9 SEPTEMBER 1976, SAME SUBJECT1. FOR THE RECORD, THE PRIMARY PURPOSE FOR BRUCE BERKMANS' REQUEST THAT I SEE HIM WAS TO ENABLE HIM TO REFER A POSSIBLE APPLICANT FOR STAFF EMPLOYMENT TO THE AGENCY. FWILL INFORMALLY RAISE THIS MATTER WITH THE PERSONNEL RECRUITER WHEN HE IS NEXT IN THE MIAMI FIELD OFFICE. BERKMANS HAD NO PERSONAL INTEREST IN THIS MATTER AND WAS SIMPLY TRYING TO PLAY THE ROLLE OF A HELPFUL INDIVIDUAL.2. HE ALSO REVIEWED SOME PROJECTS THAT HIS ORGNIZATION WILL BE INVOLVED IN BOTH LATIN AMERICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST. AS OF THIS DATE IT IS TO EARLY TO DETERMINE WHETHER WE MIGHT HAVE ANY INTEREST IN THESE MATTERS. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE NO REPORTABLE INTEL OR OPERATIONAL MATERIALS.3. BERKMANS ALSO DISCUSSED HIS COMPANY'S APPROACH TO EXECUTIVE PROTECTION AGAINST THE THREAT OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM. THIS MAY BE STILL ANOTHER AREA IN WHICH HE MIGHT OCCASIONALLY VOLUNTEER A USEFUL ITEM.4. AS NOTED EARLIER, SINCE HIS DECISION TO REFRAIN FROM ANY LITIGATION INVOLVING THE AGENCY, HE SEEMS TOTALLY RELAXED MY PERSONAL APPRAISAL NOW IS THAT HE WILL POSE NO PROBLEMS FOR US IN THE FUTURE DESPITE THE UNPLEASANTNESS OF A FEW YEARS AGO.E2 IMPDET.CL BY 211668SECRET
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 10]
SECRETJYRENCH/mw2268ROUTINE29 JUNE 1976 2:30FROM: DCD/HEADQUARTERS (OSC/FRENCH)SUBJECT: CASE 65805REF:A) DCD MIAMI 13387, 29 JUNE 1976B) MAINWARING/FRENCH PHONECON OF 29 JUNETHE ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE DEO FORSEES NO PROBLEM IN ACCEDING TO BRUCE BERKMANS' REQUEST FOR ANOTHER MEETING. IN FACT, IT MAY HELP DEFUSE THE SITUATION. ALL FUTURE REQUESTS OF THIS NATURE SHOULD BE REPORTED TO DCD HEADQUARTERS AND WILL BE HANDLED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS.E-2 IMPDET CLBY 006875SECRET15734
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 11]
SECRETCASE 65805DOM DIVISIONOperation S. Croup/OSBJFrench/mw6 July 1976Office of InspectorGeneral - 2E24 HQS.Attached for your information.cc: Copy sent toSA/DDOLA/CARE-2 IMPDET CL BY 006875PET
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 12]
SECRET 021730Z JUL 76 STAFFCITE DCD/MIAMI 13398TO: DCD/HEADQUARTERS.ATTN: OPERATIONS SERVICES GROUP (FRENCH)SUBJ: CASE 65805REF: DCD/HEADQUARTERS 157341. I MET AGAIN ON 2 JULY 1976 WITH BRUCE BERKMANS. IMMEDIATELY HE REITERATED WHAT HE HAD ALREADY TOLD ME ON THE TELEPHONE: AFTER CONSULTATIONS WITH HIS ATTORNEY AND CONSIDERABLE REFLECTION HE HAS DECIDED THAT HE WILL NOT SUE THE AGENCY OR ANY STAFFERS OR FORMER STAFFERS. HE ATTRIBUTES THIS DECISION TO WHAT HE CALLED THE INORDINATE COSTS IN BOTH TIME AND MONEY. HE ALSO VOLUNTEERED HIS FEELING THAT THE AGENCY WAS BEING KICKED FROM EVERY SIDE AND HE DID NOT WISH TO ADD TO THE PROBLEM.2. BERKMANS WAS CONSIDERABLY MORE COMPOSED AND RELAXED AT THIS SECOND MEETING ALMOST AS IF HE WERE RELIEVED AT FINALLY HAVING COME TO A DECISION. HE THEN REPEATED WHAT APPEARS NOW TO BE A SINCERE OFFER TO ACT ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS AND IN A NONOPERATIONAL CAPACITY AS A NORMAL DCD CONTACT. HE MENTIONED VOLUNTARILY THAT HE HAD SOUGHT AND OBTAINED THE CONSENT OF HIS BOSS GEORGE WACKENHUI IN THIS RESPECT.3. THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT BERKMANS IS INVOLVED IN VARIOUS FOREIGN PROJECTS WHICH COULD BE OF INFORMATIONAL INTEREST TO US. I WAS, NONETHELESS, DELIBERATELY VAGUE AND NONCOMMITTAL WITH REGARD TO HIS OFFER. I AM, HOWEVER, LESS WARY OF SOME SORT OF RELATIONSHIP THAN I MIGHT HAVE BEEN BASED PURELY ON OUR FIRST INTERVIEW. IN ANY EVENT THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT WE WILL HEAR FROM BRUCE BERKMANS AGAIN. E2 IMPORT CL BY 911668SECRET
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 13]
DCD Case 65805Jon FrenchDOMESTIC COLLECTION DIVISIONCperations Seras Croul/0S3110 Κογ Σάς.--03Case 658052 July 1976LA/CORLloyd Burdett-3 B 4402 Bq.cc: SA/DDOAttached for your information isa copy of Miami TWX 13387.E-2 IMPDET CL BY 006875
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 14]
SECRET 291430Z JUN 76 STAFFCITE DCD/MIAMI 13387.TO: DCD/HEADQUARTERSATTN: OPERATIONS SERVICES GROUP (FRENCH)SUBJ: DCD CASE 65805 - LA DIVISION REQUEST FOR CONTACT OFWACKENHUT CORPORATION OFFICERFYI, BRUCE BERKMANS TELEPHONED ME AT MY HOME LATE ON28 JUNE 1976 TO TELL ME THAT AFTER CONSULTATIONS WITHHIS ATTORNEY HE HAS DECIDED NOT TO SUE THE AGENCY.E2 IMPDET CL BY 011668SECRET
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 16]
MEMORANDUM FOR: DCD/OSB23 June 1976ATTENTION: Mr. Jon French.SUBJECT: Contact with Former Staff Agent1. This will confirm our green line telephone conversation of 22 June 1976 concerning a recommendation that DCD contact Mr. Bruce Berckmans Jr., (201-309117), a former staff agent under the LPGLOBE program. Mr. Bercbians recently telephoned an Agency staff officer with whom he is acquainted, indicating that he had information of interest and needed to talk with some one from the Agency. Mr. Berekmans is currently employed by the Wackenhut Corporation in the Miami area.2. We discussed this case with Mr. Anthony Goldin, Assistant General Counsel/DDO, who felt that a representa tive of the Agency should meet with Mr. Berckmans to see what he had on his mind. Mr. Goldin said we would not be in violation of any Agency regulations or guidelines since Mr. Berekmans was the one requesting the meeting. Mr. Goldin recommended that contact be made through an overt employée (DCD) rather than through the LA/Miami Station.3. Upon learning of your two immediate intel reports on 22 June, from private investigator sources, concerning plans for possible assassination of Caribbean leaders, we felt there may be a connection between these reports and Mr. Berckmans' information. It is for that reason that we suggested thật DCD might want to move rapidly on this matter.4. As mentioned on the green line, Mr. Berckmans' address is 3941 Midway St., Miami, Florida; his telephone number is (area code 305) 443-2260.![signature of L. Burnett]Lloyd C. BurnettC/LA/CAR/CARISECRETE2 IMPDETCL by 012913
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 17]
SECRET23 June 1976MEMORANDUM FOR: DCD/OSBATTENTION : Mr. Jon FrenchSUBJECT : Contact with Former Staff Agent1. This will confirm our green line telephone conversation of 22 June 1976 concerning a recommendation that DCD contact Mr. Bruce Berckmans Jr., (201-309117), a former staff agent under the LPGLOBE program. Mr. Berckmans recently telephoned an Agency staff officer with whom he is acquainted, indicating that he had information of interest and needed to talk with some one from the Agency. Mr. Berckmans is currently employed by the Wackenhut Corporation in the Miami area.2. We discussed this case with Mr. Anthony Goldin, Assistant General Counsel/DDO, who felt that a representa- tive of the Agency should meet with Mr. Berckmans to see what he had on his mind. Mr. Goldin said we would not be in violation of any Agency regulations or guidelines since Mr. Berckmans was the one requesting the meeting. Mr. Goldin recommended that contact be made through an overt employee (DCD) rather than through the LA/Miami Station.3. Upon learning of your two immediate intel reports on 22 June, from private investigator sources, concerning plans for possible assassination of Caribbean leaders, we felt there may be a connection between these reports and Mr. Berckmans' information. It is for that reason that we suggested that DCD might want to move rapidly on this matter.4. As mentioned on the green line, Mr. Berckmans' address is 3941 Midway St., Miami, Florida; his telephone number is (area code 305) 443-2260.Lloyd. C. BurnettC/LA/CAR/CARISECRETE2 IMPDETCL by 012913
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 18]
ogeno problefoll y/o Is-estrs flhelp defusebl not regulen bydeodo.X77309 Renumber2 B1415OGC/DOOA. Yellcalled but maltdecided not tisalsolated egetOKpossibly tomelly wrong?mentelly ?(800 Turboconf late todymain of our intreone more surtyone hour what to do is my to
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 19]
SECRET 231445Z JUN 76 STAFFCITE DCD/MIAMI 13374TO: DCD/HEADQUARTERSATTN: OPERATIONS SERVICES GROUP/OSB (FRENCH) FROM MAIAVARNINGSUBJ: CASE 65885 - LA DIVISION REQUEST FOR CONTACT OF WACKENHUT CORPORATION OFFICERREF : DCD/HEADQUARTERS 19603I AM MEETING BRUCE BERCKMANS, JR., AT 0800 ON 24 JUNE 1976 AT WACKENHUT OFFICES. PLEASE ADVISE IF IT WOULD BE USEFUL PRIOR TO THE MEETING TO KNOW SOMETHING OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDERLYING THE FINAL STATEMENT IN PARAGRAPH ONE OF REFERENT. E2 IMPDET CL BY 011668.SECRET
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 20]
# SECRET 241400Z JUN 76 STAFFCITE DCD/MIAMI 13377TO: DCD/HEADQUARTERS INFO DIRECTORATTN:- 080 (FRENCH)SUBJ: CASE 63805REF: DCD/HEADQUARTERS 15683RYBAT RULE WEDISH1. I MET BRUCE BERCKMANS AT HIS WACKENHUT OFFICE THIS   MORNING AS SCHEDULED. BERCKMANS BEGAN THE INTERVIEW BY   REQUESTING THAT I READ A MULTIPAGE LETTER WHICH HE IS THINKING   OF SENDING TO THE INSPECTOR GENERAL. IT IS A DETAILED   STATEMENT OF GRIEVANCES STEMNING FROM HIS FORCED RESIGNATION   AND INDICATES THAT HE IS CONSIDERING A SUIT AGAINST THE AGENCY.   HE HAS IN FACT RETAINED COUNCIL, APPARENTLY ANOTHER FORMER   AGENCY STAFFER, BUT THEY HAVE NOT YET DECIDED WHETHER TO   PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION. OTHER ELEMENTS SHOULD PROBABLY BE   INFORMED.2. THE PRECEDING NOT WITHSTANDING, BERCKMANS, WHO IS   FOND OF SAYING THAT HE RESIGNED FROM THE AGENCY BUT NOT THE   UNITED STATES, OFFERED TO SERVE AS A FAIRLY TYPICAL DCD   CONTACT WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION HE DERIVES IN HIS   REGULAR WACKENHUT DUTIES. BERCKMANS UNDOUBTEDLY HAS MANY   USEFUL CONTACTS ESPECIALLY IN LATIN AMERICA AND SOON IN   THE MIDDLE EAST. UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES THIS MIGHT   BE A USEFUL INFORMATIONAL RELATIONSHIP.3. I TOLD BERCKMANS, HOWEVER, THAT IN VIEW OF THE   CIRCUMSTANCES, DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH | ABOVE I FELT IT   INAPPROPRIATE FOR US TO MAINTAIN ANY SYSTEMATIC RELATIONSHIP   AT THIS TIME. SHOULD HE DECIDE NOT TO PROCEED WITH HIS   SUIT AND OTHER THINGS FALL INTO PLACE, PERHAPS A FUTURE   USEFUL CONTACT COULD BE ESTABLISHED.4. IN DESCRIBING HIS DUTIES BERCKMANS DID DROP ONE MINOR   PIECE OF INFORMATION WHICH MIGHT BE USEFUL AGAINST THE CURRENTPAGE 2 DCO/MIAMI 13377 SECRETJAMAICAN SITUATION. THROUGH A SUBCONTRACTOR HIS COMPANY ISCONSIDERING A CONTRACT IN JAMAICA WHICH WOULD PROVIDECUSTODIAL SERVICES FOR REVERE BAUXITE HOLDINGS WHICH THECOMPANY IS APPARENTLY PLANNING TO MOINBALL, E2 IMPDET CL BY 011668.SECRET5. FILE OSF CASE 65805
[104-10291-10017.pdf — page 21]
2268PRIORITY22 JUNE 1976 1:00SECRET15603DCD/MIAMIFROM: DCD/HEADQUARTERS (JFRENCH/OSC)NEW CASE 65805SUBJECT: LA DIVISION REQUEST FOR CONTACT OF WACKENHUT CORPORATION.1. THIS CASE IS RESPONSIVE TO REQUIREMENT CONTROL NUMBER CPLA-760449   AND OBJECTIVE V. LA DIVISION HAS REQUESTED DCD ASSISTANCE IN RECONTACTING BRUCE   BERCKMANS, JR., DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS OF WACKENHUT   CORPORATION, CORAL GABLES, FLA. LA DIVISION PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING:   ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER 3941 MIDWAY ST, MIAMI, TEL. (305) 443-2260.   BERCKMANS IS A FORMER AGENCY NON-OFFICIAL COVER OFFICER WHO WAS ASKED TO   RESIGN FROM THE AGENCY IN 1970.2. THROUGH AN LA DIVISION OFFICER, TOM CLINES, BERCKMANS HAS   REQUESTED CONTACT WITH AN AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE AS HE HAS INFORMATION   WHICH MAY BE OF INTEREST TO THE AGENCY. THE NAME OF TOM CLINES MAY BE   USED TO FACILITATE CONTACT WITH BERCKMANS. LA DIVISION HAS REQUESTED   EXPEDITIOUS HANDLING OF THIS REQUEST AS THEY BELIEVE THAT BERCKMANS MAY   HAVE INFORMATION ON POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN JAMAICA.3. LA DIVISION HAS EMPHASIZED THAT THIS REQUEST IS ONLY IN RESPONSE   TO BERCKMANS REQUEST FOR CONTACT WITH THE AGENCY. LA DIVISION HAS NO   OPERATIONAL INTEREST IN BERCKMANS NOR HIS COMPANY. OFFICE OF GENERAL   COUNSEL HAS CONCURRED IN CONTACTING BERCKMANS BY DCD MIAMI.
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 0]
# 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992SECRET - SECURITY INFORMATION# CONTRACT PERSONNELOFFICE OF PERSONNELRETURN FILE TO SE-45NOTICE: This is an office of Personnel File and subject to 10 day limitation period. This file has been charged to MAGGIE and is due to be returned to CONTRACT PERSONNEL DIVISION, SE-65 HS., x7841, as of_27/15/75
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 1]
Mr. George Martin RosnekDear Mr. Rosnek:Reference is made to your contract with the U. S. Government as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 1970, as amended.Effective 8 April 1979, paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" is amended by deleting the figure $37,270 as it appears therein and by substituting in lieu thereof the figure $41,270. Said paragraph is also modified to provide that subsequent augmentation of your basic fee, based upon the percentage increase authorized U. S. Government employees in the annual Legislative Pay increases, will be individually authorized by contract amendment at appropriate times as requested and certified by the responsible Government official, provided however, that your total compensation under this paragraph does not exceed the salaryTHE TOP STOP ofall other Terms and Conditions of the CONTRACT, as amended, remain in full fore and effect.
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 2]
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLYMr. George Hartin RoerekDear Hr. Rosnek:Reference is made to your contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 1970, as amended.Effective 7 October 1979 paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation" is amended by deleting the figure $41,270 as it appears therein and by substituting in lieu thereof the figure $44,159.All other terms and conditions of the contract, as amended, remain in full force and effect.UNITED STATES GOVERNMENTBY /s/ Gene L. ByrdContracting OfficerADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 3]
SECRET$5_{oct\atop 1979}$CI 321-79MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel DivisionFROM: David H. BleeChief, Counterintelligence StaffTHROUGH: Chief, Career Management StaffManpower and Support Branch/ContractSUBJECT: Amendment to Contract forGeorge Martin Rosnek,1. Per paragraph four (4) entitled "Compensation"   of subject's contract, effective 1 March 1970, as amended,   it is hereby requested that the figure $41,270 be deleted   and the figure $44,159 be substituted therein. This in-   crease represents the percentage increase (7 percent)   authorized US Government employees in the annual Legislative   Pay increase effective 1 October 1979.2. All classified Secret.David H. BleeCONCUR:![signature of the Chief, Career Management Staff]Chief, Career Management Staff$9 octDate$79$APPROVEDChief, Contract Personnel DivisionDateCL BY 063765RVW 5 Oct 99 DRV D9c.1SECRET
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 4]
ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERIAL USE ONLYMr. George Martin PosnekDear Mr. RosneksReference is made to your contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Central Intelligence Agency, effective 1 March 1970, as emended.Effective 8 Foril 1979, paragraph four (4) entitled "Carpensation" is amended by deleting the figure $37,270 as it appears therein and by substitating in lieu thereof the figure $41,270, Said paragraph is also modified to provide that subsequent augmentation of your basic fee, based upon the percentage increase authorized U.S. Government employees in the annual Legislative Pey lecreases, will be individually authorised by contract amendmen at appropriate thes as requested and certified by the responsible Government official, provided however, that your total compensation under this paragraph does not exceed the equivalent of the salary rate paid at the top step of GS-15.All other terms and conditions of the contract, as amended, remain in full force and effect.CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCYBY /s/ Gene L. BundSpecial Contracting OfficerACCEPTEN:George Martin Posnek 11 APR 1979DateWITNESS: 11.1 APR 1979DateAPPROTED:David H. B 12 APR 1979DateADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 5]
SECRETMAR29CI 121-79MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel DivisionFROM: David H. BleeChief, Counterintelligence StaffTHROUGH: Chief, Career Management StaffManpower and Support Branch/ContractSUBJECT: Amendment to Contract forGeorge Martin Rosnek1. Action Requested: It is requested that the contract   for Mr. George Martin Rosnek, an Independent Contractor, be   amended to increase his compensation from $37,270 to $41,270   per annum effective 8 April 1979.2. Background: In September 1978 Mr. Rosnek, a former   senior officer of the KGB, raised with his case officer the   question of prior financial commitments made to him by the   Agency. Specifically, he claimed that the Agency still owed   him $20,000 of an original commitment of $50,000 made to him   at the time of his defection. This $20,000 claim has become   an obsession with Mr. Rosnek and is likely to affect negatively   his relationship with the Agency unless resolved to his relative   satisfaction. Attached for background information are   documents relating to Mr. Rosnek's claim.3. After careful consideration of the equities involved   in this case it is my belief that security considerations   dictate that we settle Mr. Rosnek's claim in the following   manner. I will approve an increase in his annual payment by   $4,000 effective April 1979 (from $37,270 to $41,270).   Thereafter, his annual compensation would be increased each   October in the amount identical to the cost of living increase   given to US Government employees. (This cost of living pro-   vision is currently in his contract). However, at such timeSECRETCL BY 063765RVW 26 Mar 99 DRV D9c.1
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 6]
# SECRETas Mr. Rosnek reaches the salary paid an employee in thetop step of GS-15 (currently $47,500) his annual compensationwould be increased only as the pay for that step increases.4. All other terms and conditions of said contract, as   amended, remain in full force and effect.5. All classified Secret.![signature of David H. Blee]David H. BleeAttachments:As StatedCONCUR:![signature]Chief, Career Management Staff05 APR 1970DateAPPROVED:Chief, Contract Personnel DivisionDate2SECRET
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 7]
SECRETMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Counterintelligence StaffFROM: Steven K. RubensteinC/CI/A/DEFSUBJECT: PDDONORREFERENCES: A. Memo Dated 16 February 1970From DC/Security Research StaffB. Memo Dated 14 August 1972From DC/Security Research StaffC. Acknowledgement and Release FormDated 12 July 19731. A careful review of the PDDONOR file substantiates the fact that there were three unequivocal financial commitments made to PDDONOR at the time of his defection in February 1964. These three commitments were:a. He would be paid $25,000 for each of the two years he cooperated in place. Total $50,000.b. He would receive $10,000 for his part in identifying William Vassal, a British Admiralty employee as a KGB agent.c. He would receive $25,000 per year salary from the Agency.2. The question at issue now is whether an additional commitment was also made to PODONOR to the effect that the Agency would provide financial assistance to him to purchase a home. According to PODONOR, on 30 January 1964 in Geneva prior to his defection in a conversation with his case officer, Mr. Tennent Bagley he stated, "I will arrive with what I have on my back - no home - no roof - no anything." The reply to PDDONOR was as follows; "This will be taken care of. It will be provided." This exchange in PDDONOR's view, constitutedSECRETDCL RVW 14 Feb-00DRY D.9c.1 BY 06-3765
[104-10291-10019.pdf — page 8]
SECRETwhat he believes was a commitment on the part of the Agency to provide him with financial assistance in the purchase of a home. A memorandum dated 16 February 1970, written by Mr. Bruce Solie describes this verbal exchange between PDDONOR and his case officer. (See Reference A). In addition, a memorandum dated 14 August 1972 also written by Mr. Solie (Reference B) states that "Nosenko stated that prior to his defection in Geneva, he discussed his future with Bagley and made three requests, these being:a. Employment at $25,000 per year;b. $50,000 in savings account;c. Assistance in purchasing a house.According to Nosenko, Bagley, a day or two later, informed Nosenko that his requests had been approved and Nosenko considers this constituted a valid verbal contract."3. From PDDONOR's viewpoint therefore an additional commitment, quite separate and apart from the three listed in paragraph 1 was made to him. Consequently, he now argues that a payment made to him in July 1970, in the amount of $20,000 and which he used as a downpayment on a house, was the fulfillment of this additional commitment and not part of the $50,000 he was promised for his two years in place. This despite the fact that in the 14 August 1972 memorandum as Mr. Solie states in paragraph 5. "Nosenko also considers that the assistance in purchasing furniture, a house, etc., which he has been given since 1969 should be considered as cancelling the matter of the $50,000.4. What seems to have occurred is a change of position on PDDONOR's part. While previously acknowledging that the original $50,000-commitment had been met (paragraph 5 of Reference B) PODONOR now takes the position that of the below listed payments only $30,000 should be applied against the $50,000 commitment. The July 1970 payment of $20,000 should be applied against a separate commitment to provide assistance in purchasing a home.2SECRET