[104-10291-10014.pdf — page 150]
# GS-12 6400.00 1 May 1950Case officer and staff work. Responsibility, under the Operations Officer, for action against Satellite targets for Vienna Station.* COURSES OF INSTRUCTION WERE COMPLETED DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT. LIST TITLE, LOCATION OF SCHOOL, LENGTH OF  COURSE AND DATE COMPLETED.None| PROFICIENCY IN   |    READING    | UNDERSTANDING |   SPEAKING    || ---------------- | :-----------: | :-----------: | :-----------: || FOREIGN LANGUAGE | EXC GOOD FAIR | EXC GOOD FAIR | EXC GOOD FAIR || French           |       X       |       X       |       X       || German           |       X       |       X       |       X       || Spanish          |       X       |               |       X       || Portuguese       |               |       X       |       X       |MY PREFERENCE FOR SENT DUTY, ALTERNATE ASSIGNMENT IS ABLE IN US SO STATE:TYPE OF DUTY LOCATIONBase Chief Salzburg ofwestern EuropeK. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN PERSONAL STATUS SINCE ORIGINAL EMPLOYMENT OR LAST REPORT, WHICHEVER IS LATER?MARITAL STATUS NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS EMERGENCY ADDRESS![checkbox] YES ![checkbox] YES ![checkbox] YESX NO X NO X NOIF THE ANSWER TO ANY OF THE ABOVE IS YES, ATTACH A SEPARATE DETAILED REPORT IN DUPLICATE THEREOF. IN THE CASE OFMARRIAGE WILL INCLUDE NAMES, ADDRESSES, AND CITIZENSHIP OF SPOUSE, FATHER-IN-LAW, MOTHER-IN-LAW.![signature] O'RISAL28 January 1952DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEESECTIONS 7 THROUGH 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR7. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT OCCASION FOR REPORTDATE FROM DATE TO ANNUAL REASSIGNMENT OF PROPOSED REASSIGNMENT COVERING INITIAL OTREPORTING OFFICER OF EMPLOYEE REPORTED ON DAYS OF EMPLOYMENTJune '51 25 Jan 528. IS THIS EMPLOYEE QUALIFIED TO X YES IS EMPLOYEE BETTER QUALIFIED X YES IF SO, WHAT DUTY OR DUTIES   PERFORM ALL PRESENT DUTIES? NO FOR OTHER DUTIES? NO Base Chief or Ops chief   directing other case officers.9. DO YOU CONCUR IN EMPLOYEE'S DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES UNDER SECTION 2? X YES IF NO, IF NO, EXPLAIN IN SECTION 11   DO YOU RECOMMEND EMPLOYEE HAS EMPLOYEE STRIVEN FOR X YES IF SO TO WHAT GRADE AND FOR WHAT GS-13   PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT? NO FOR PROMOTION? POSITION9. FOR EACH FACTOR OBSERVED CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX TO INDICATE HOW THIS EMPLOYEE COMPARES WITH ALL OTHERS OF THE   SAME CLASSIFICATION WHOSE PROFESSIONAL ABILITIES ARE KNOWN TO YOU PERSONALLY, DO NOT LIMIT THIS COMPARISON TO THOSE   OTHERS NOW UNDER YOUR SUPERVISION DO NOT HESITATE TO MARK NOT OBSERVED ON ANY QUALITY WHEN APPROPRIATE| RATING FACTORS                                   | NOT OBSERVED | UNSATISFACTORY | FAIR | GOOD | VERY GOOD | EXCELLENT | OUTSTANDING || ------------------------------------------------ | :----------: | :------------: | :--: | :--: | :-------: | :-------: | :---------: || A. ABILITY TO WORK AND GET ALONG WITH PEOPLE     |              |                |      |  X   |           |           |      X      || B. INTEREST AND ENTHUSIASM IN WORK               |              |                |      |  X   |           |           |      X      || C. SECURITY CONSCIOUSNESS                        |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || D. ABILITY TO GRASP INSTRUCTIONS AND PLANS       |              |                |      |  X   |           |           |      X      || E. ATTENTION TO DUTY                             |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || F. JUDGEMENT AND COMMON SENSE                    |              |                |  X   |      |           |           |      X      || G. ABILITY TO OBTAIN RESULTS AND GET THINGS DONE |              |                |      |  X   |           |           |      X      || H. DISCRETION                                    |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || I. INITIATIVE                                    |              |                |      |  X   |           |           |      X      || J. ABILITY TO HANDLE AND DIRECT PEOPLE           |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || K. PERFORMANCE OF PRESENT DUTIES (ITEM 2)        |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || L. ABILITY TO EVALUATE INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION  |              |                |      |  X   |           |           |      X      || M. TACT                                          |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || N. SAGACITY (NON-GULLIBILITY)                    |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || O. LEADERSHIP                                    |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || P. PHYSICAL STAMINA                              |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      || Q. MENTAL STAMINA                                |              |                |      |      |     X     |           |      X      |10. INDICATE YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARD HAVING THIS EMPLOYEE UNDER YOUR COMMAND OR SUPERVISION, WOULD YOU:    DEFINITELY DO NOT WANT HIM NOT HAVE HIM PREFER NOT BE SATISFIED BE PLEASED PARTICULARY DESIRE HIM?    HAVE HIM TO HAVE HIM TO HAVE HIM TO HAVE HIM?11. ENTER HERE ANY DESIRED REMARKS PERTAINING TO PARTICULAR QUALIFICATIONS OR LACK THEREOF WHICH ARE CONSIDERED    PERTINENT TO THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE. OUTSTANDING ASSETS AND OR SERIOUS LIMITATIONS SHOULD BE STATED    ALSO REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO REASSIGNMENT WILL BE GIVEN IF APPROPRIATE TO THIS REPORT.In the ten months Subj has been under my supervision he has shown an outstanding ability to get work done, even under the pressure of an unusually heavy work load. Subj's willingness to take on additional duties and his indefatigable efforts to discharge all responsibilities are also considered outstanding. Subj's operational and liaison experience show plainly in his daily handling of ops problems. Subj's ability to roganize material, and budget his time for greatest effeciency improved notably in the past months.Subj is in every sense a senior intelligence officer.(IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED ATTACH EXTRA SHEET)29 January 1952DATE(II REVIEWING OFFICER OR CHIEF OF STATION DOES NOTCONCUR WITH THIS REPORT EXCEPTIONS WILL BE STATEDIN SPACE PROVIDED ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF)![signature] Morton A. WoolleySIGNATURE OF REPORTING OFFICERUNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THIS REPORT TO BE SHOWN TO THE EMPLOYFE REPORTED ONCONFIDENTIALDruck. F. SAILER W. I. Pazed [illegible] 43