[104-10291-10002.pdf — page 175]
# SECRETT PERSONNELAPR 18 2 47 PH. 57a. State in the spaces below up to six of the more important SPECIFIC duties performed during rating period.b. Place the most important first. Do not include amount of unimportant duties.c. Note performance on each specific duty considering truly effectiveness in performance of this specific duty (MAIL ROOM supervisor only).d. Compare, in your mind, when possible, the individual being rated with others performing the same duty at a similar level of responsibility.e. Two individuals with the same job title may be performing different duties. If so, rate them on different duties.f. Be specific. Examples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:ORAL BRIEFINGGIVING LECTURESCONDUCTING SEMINARSWRITING TECHNICAL REPORTSCONDUCTING EXTERNAL LIAISONTYPINGTAKING DICTATIONSUPERVISINGMAS AND USES AREA KNOWLEDGEDEVELOPS NEW PROGRAMSANALYZES INCIDENTAL REPORTSMANAGES FILESOPERATES RADIOCOORDINATES WITH OTHER OFFICERSWRITES REGULATIONSPREPARES CORRESPONDENCECONDUCTS INTERROGATIONSPREPARES SUMMARIESTRANSLATES GERMANDEBRIEFING SOURCESKEEPS FLOORSDRIVES TRUCKMAINTAINS AIR CONDITIONINGEVALUATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATAFor some jobs, duties may be broken down even further if supervisor considers it advisable, e.g., combined key and phone operation, in the case of a radio operator.1 - INCOMPETENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY2 - BARELY ADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY3 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY ACCEPTABLY4 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN A COMPETENT MANNER5 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN SUCH A FINE MANNER THAT HE IS A DISTINCT ASSET TO HIS JOB6 - PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN AN OUTSTANDING MANNER FOUND IN VERY FEW INDIVIDUALS HOLDING SIMILAR JOBS7 - EXCELS ANYONE I KNOW IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY| DESCRIPTIVE RATING NUMBER                                                             | SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1 Assista Branch Chief in Management and supervision of branch | RATING NUMBER 4/5   | SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 Provides operational and administrative guidance to field station. | RATING NUMBER 5 || ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 Gen. Supervision of C2, liaison and CP ops. of Branch             | RATING NUMBER 5                                                                  | SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 | RATING NUMBER                                                                          |                 || SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 Conducts liaison with other Agency elements and outside agencies. | RATING NUMBER 6                                                                  | SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6 | RATING NUMBER                                                                          |                 |NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEDIRECTIONS: Stress strengths and weaknesses, particularly those which affect development on present job.His greatest strength is a warm and engaging personality, an unabashed friendliness that secures him an immediate willingness to cooperate from the people with whom he deals. He is an extremely hard worker, an accurate and meticulous reporter, has energy and enthusiasm and is generally sound in his judgment. On occasions he demonstrates a lack of depth in his assessment of a situation which leads him to jump too quickly to conclusions based on intuition and emotion. As the facts assert themselves, however, he can be ready to revise his opinions. As his knowledge of the Agency and operations continue to grow, however, this tendency should diminish.SECTION D. SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATIONDIRECTIONS: Take into account here everything you know about the individual...productivity, conduct in the job, pertinent personal characteristics or habits, special defects or talents... and how he fits in with your team. Compare him with others doing similar work at about the same level.1. CLEARLY SUPERIOR-HE SHOULD BE PROMOTED2. OF DOUBTFUL SUITABILITY...SHOULD NOT HAVE ASSIGNED HIM IF I HAD KNOWN WHAT I KNOW NOW3. A HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE EMPLOYEE...SELDOM ATTRACTS BUT WITH NO DISADVANTAGES SUFFICIENTLY OUTSTANDING TO WARRANT SEPARATION4. OF LOW SUITABILITY-AS MOST PEOPLE I KNOW IN THE ORGANIZATION1/55. A FINE EMPLOYEE... HAS SOME OUTSTANDING STRENGTHS6. AN UNSUALLY PROMISING PERSON IN TERMS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATIONRATINGNUMBERIs this individual suites for work in some other position in the organization? [X] YES [] NO. If YES, indicate fully.Although he is perfectly capable of conducting his current job with distinction, he would shine in any position involving liaison with the U.S. military in which his long experience in dealing with military men and his personality could be brought to bear.SECRET