[104-10291-10002.pdf — page 174]
# SECRETFITNESS REPORT (Part I) PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONS:FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Consult current instructions for completing this report.FOR THE SUPERVISOR: This report is designed to help you express your evaluation of your subordinate and to transmit this evaluation to your supervisor and senior officials. Organization policy requires that you inform the subordinate where he stands with you. Completion of the report can help you prepare for a discussion with him of his strengths and weaknesses. It is also organization policy that you show Part I of this report to the employee except under conditions specified in Regulation 20-170. It is recommended that you read the entire form before completing any question. If this is the initial report on the employee, it must be completed and forwarded to the Office of Personnel no later than 30 days after the date indicated in item A. of Section A below.SECTION A.1. NAMEWheeler, Robert P.3. OFFICE DIVISION/BRANCH OF ASSIGNMENTDDP/FF/17. GRADE09-1410. TYPE OF REPORTX Initial2. DATE OF BIRTH4 Oct. 19155. SERVICE DESIGNATIONDI8. DATE REPORT DUE IN OPApril 30, 19579. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Inclusive dates)16 November 1956 -15 March 1957SECTION B.1. THE RATER: THIS REPORT [X] HAS [ ] HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO THE INDIVIDUAL RATED. IF NOT SHOWN, EXPLAIN WHY NOT:A. CHECK (X) APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS:[X] THIS REPORT REFLECTS MY OWN OPINIONS OF THIS INDIVIDUAL.[ ] THIS INDIVIDUAL IS RATED WITHIN CI OR D. A WARNING LETTER IS BEING SENT TO HIM & A COPY ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.[ ] THIS REPORT REFLECTS THE COMBINED OPINIONS OF MYSELF AND PREVIOUS SUPERVISORS.[ ] I CERTIFY THAT THE RATED INDIVIDUAL KNOWS HOW TO EVALUATE HIS JOB PERFORMANCE BECAUSE (Specify):[X] I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THIS EMPLOYEE HIS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES SO THAT HE KNOWS WHERE HE STANDS.B. THIS DATE16 April 1957C. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISORWilliam F. Nelson [signature]D. SUPERVISOR'S OFFICIAL TITLEChief, FF/12. FOR THE REVIEWING OFFICIAL: RECORD ANY SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WILL LEAD TO A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS REPORT.> Posted Pos. Control> Reviewed by FUD> BY> DATE> 22 APR 1957A. THIS DATE16 April 1957B. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF REVIEWING OFFICIALVernet L. GreshamC. OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDeputy Chief, FRSECTION C. JOB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION11. RATING ON GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF DUTIESDIRECTIONS: Consider ONLY the productivity and effectiveness with which the individual being rated has performed his duties during the rating period. Compare his truly with others doing similar work at a similar level of responsibility. Factors other than productivity will be taken into account later in Section B.4/51. DOES NOT PERFORM DUTIES ADEQUATELY. HE IS INCOMPETENT.2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE. ALTHOUGH HE HAS HAD SPECIFIC GUIDANCE OR TRAINING, HE OFTEN FAILS TO ASSUME HIS RESPONSIBILITIES.3. PERFORMS DUTIES IN A COMPETENT, EFFECTIVE MANNER.4. A FINE PERFORMANCE. CARRIES OUT MANY OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES EXCEPTIONALLY WELL.5. PERFORMS HIS DUTIES IN SUCH AN OUTSTANDING MANNER THAT HE IS EQUALLED BY FEW OTHER PERSONS UNDER THE SUPERVISOR.CONTENTS: With additional experience on the job, his performance might be such as to warrant a 5 rating.![image]FORM NO. 45 (Part 1)SECRETPerformance