Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 160]
# SECRETSECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and assuming greater responsibilities. Amplify or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to determining future personnel actions.Mr. Smith has demonstrated both competence and versatility since his assignment to CA/PROP. With no prior experience in the area, he was assigned to WH affairs and has quickly developed both a surprising knowledge of the problems of that volatile group of countries and an excellent rapport with members of the Division (which, on several occasions has indicated a strong interest in securing his services when his release from the staff can be arranged). Assignments are completed with dispatch and in good order.The rating of 3 with regard to the proposed campaign on Neutralism-Nationalism reflects only that we have not yet got underway in this admittedly difficult and controversial field. The sum of research which Mr. Smith has done in this field leads him to the present conclusion (in which undersigned concurs) that unlike most of our other campaigns this will have to be conducted on a selected country basis and differently tailored for each.During the absence of the rating official Mr. Smith has acted as Branch Chief.SECTION F CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTSBY EMPLOYEE1. I certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.DATE23 January 19612. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONBY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONIF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON.EMPLOYEE UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 30 DAYSOTHER (Specify):DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR23 January 1961 CA/PROP/C/Guidance Branch W.H. CARPENTER3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALI WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALCA/C/PROPSECRET
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 162]
# SECRETSECTION E NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF MANNER OF JOB PERFORMANCEStress strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in current position. Indicate suggestions made to employee for improvement of his work. Give recommendations for his training. Describe, if appropriate, his potential for development and for assuming greater responsibilities. A-vity or explain, if appropriate, ratings given in SECTIONS B, C, and D to provide the best basis for determining future personnel actions.Subject is an exceptionally able political action officer. His capacity for grasping a rapidly developing political situation quickly and for making on-the-spot decisions is quite unique, and he would be a powerful addition to any station with a challenging political program. He is not always able to separate the significant from the insignificant and therefore tends to over-report. He is also inclined to operate more as a singleton than as an integrated member of an operations team. He has been quite successful in exploiting PP contacts for FI by-product. Additional training does not appear necessary at this time.In preparing this report, careful consideration was given to the guidance in FS Field Dispatch No. 20-40 which recognizes the principle of rating the individual against the group, and establishes an "average" rating as being an entirely satisfactory performance. The supervisor, however, considers this fitness report to be in keeping with that guidance.SECTION F CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS1. BY EMPLOYEEI certify that I have seen Sections A, B, C, D and E of this Report.SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE /s/ Joseph B. Smith2. BY SUPERVISORIF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATIONIF REPORT IS NOT BEING MADE AT THIS TIME, GIVE REASON.EMPLOYEE UNDER MY SUPERVISION LESS THAN 90 DAYS REPORT MADE WITHIN LAST 90 DAYSOTHER(Specify)DATA OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR TYPED ON PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE30 March 1960 /s/ Donald M. Richardson3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIALI WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE ABOUT THE SAME EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A HIGHER EVALUATION.I WOULD HAVE GIVEN THIS EMPLOYEE A LOWER EVALUATION.I CANNOT JUDGE THESE EVALUATIONS. I AM NOT SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALDATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED ON PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE30 March 1960 /s/ John H. RichardsonSECRET
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 165]
SECRET9 November 1959COMMENT OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL:HALSEY, ROCHON and I have carefully reviewed this Fitness Report in order to comply with division policy of avoiding overrating. We are satisfied that TCOHILL, who has been given a high rating with respect to specific performance characteristics, fully merits such rating. During the fourteen years I have been with the Agency, I have had the opportunity to observe personally a good number of political action operation officers. Additionally, I have worked closely with TCOHILL during the current 1959 Philippine election. I have no hesitation in stating that I regard him as an unusually qualified officer for political action in the field. I believe also that he should be promoted as soon as practicable from GS-13 to GS-14.![signature of Stephen P. Sicaden]STEPHEN P. SICADENSECRET
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 178]
# TRAINING EVALUATIONCOUNTER INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS COURSE No. 16| NAME             | SEX          | DATES OF COURSE      | NO. OF STUDENTS || ---------------- | ------------ | -------------------- | --------------- || SMITH, Joseph B. | Male         | 25 Nov - 13 Dec 1957 | 13 OFFICE       || DATE OF BIRTH    | HUD DATE     | CLASS OR RANK        |                 || 16 June 1921     | 17 Sept 1951 | G6-13                | DDP PR          |PRESENTED ASSIGNMENT OR PRESENT POSITIONDeputy Chief of FE/3.1. Course Objectives: to familiarize the student with the various types of CE operations and with methods and procedures peculiar to CE in the field and at Headquarters, to ourling CE objectives, and to increase proficiency in the recognition and exploitation of leadsII. Course Characteristics: The Counterespionage Operations Course is of three weeks duration. The curriculum material is presented by means of lectures, seminars, and directed reading. It is divided into sections as follows:A. Introduction (definition of terms, the CE Staff, operational security and risk assessment, sources of CE leads, CE reporting and records, documentation)B. InterrogationC. Foreign Intelligence Services (with emphasis on currently hostile services)D. Penetration and DetectionE. Double Agent OperationsDuring the course each student is required to present orally a CE case and to submit a written version of the case. Evaluations are based on problems, written exercises requiring analyses of assignment case studies, the case analysis presented by the student, and on objective tests.
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 179]
S-E-C-RETIII. Evaluations: (This student's perfomance indicated by asterisk.)A. Two dorhla amat problems and one walk-in problem requiring cove analysis. This alysis involves thorough study of the case:1.  To determine areas of missing, inadequate, or questionable information.2.  To pick out information which can be checked through other sources,3.  To recoarse all possible leads.4.  To assess the risk involved.5.  To propose appropriate action (operational decisions).|                                | Fail | Poor | Satio | Exc | Sup | Incomplete || ------------------------------ | ---- | ---- | ----- | --- | --- | ---------- || Ratings in this clas           |      | 6    | 8     |     |     | 1          || Total of ratings in 15 classes | 1    | 15   | 199   | 18  |     | 4          |B. Four written exercises requiring analysis of assigned CB case studies.|                                | Foll | Poor | Batis | Exc | Sup | Incomplete || ------------------------------ | ---- | ---- | ----- | --- | --- | ---------- || Ratings in this clac           |      | 4    | 9     | 1   |     | 1          || Total of ratinga in 14 classes |      |      | 193   | 24  |     | 1          |C. Case Analysis (Student Presentation.)|                                | Fail | Poor | Satio | Exe | Sup | Incomplete || ------------------------------ | ---- | ---- | ----- | --- | --- | ---------- || Ratinga in thio las            |      |      | 0     | 6   |     | 1          || Total of ratings in 15 classer |      |      | 179   | 49  |     | 1          |D. Objective testo based on all sections of the course.|                                | Faλλ | Yoor | Γ. Sati0 | Exc | Suti | Inccolat || ------------------------------ | ---- | ---- | -------- | --- | ---- | -------- || Ratingn in this cloo           |      | 2    | 7        | 5   |      | 1        || Total of ratinga in 15 closeuا | 5    | 54   | 132      | 43  | 1    | 1        |- 2 -S-6-C-R-3-T
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 180]
Mr. Smith was reserved, but his contributions were quite pertinent and advanced the progress of the class discussions. In his written work he showed a sound knowledge and a feel for the handling of agents, but in other aspects of the cases and problems his efforts were more casual. His student presentation demonstrated a cautious approach and a comprehensive analysis of a possible double agent.This course goal or objective; he indicated an unusual.demonstrated that he was one of the most effective individuals in this area.The student showed unusual competence, skill, or ability in meeting this objective or goal; he demonstrated a thorough grasp of the material presented, or, if skills were involved, he demonstrated that he could perform in an extremely effective manner in this area.The student met this objective in a competent and adequate manner; he demonstrated a good understanding and a grasp of the information presented, or if skills were involved, he demonstrated sufficient competence to operate effectively in this area.Although the student may have met some of the standards set for complete achievement of this objective, he demonstrated neither particular knowledge or sufficient level of skill to be consistently competent in.Valuable. The student was shown to grasp the concepts before them, presented, or demonstrated that he did not acquire the necessary insights and skills to operate at even minimum capability in this area.![signature of Harry D.H. Cassoll]
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 181]
SECRETREPORT OF SW and 7 ⅓ S TRAINING1.  Psoudo: Joseph B. Smith2.  Office: Divisions: Date: 27 Oct 1955 Grade: Branch:3.  Project Assignment: Malaya Station4.  Dates Trained: 10 Oct 1955 Location: Singapore5.  Training Received: Briefing in use of low level system for dead-drop use only    Basic SW:    F. S: IO restoration,    Other:6.  Evaluation: Smith was able to spend only about three hours in the briefing session. During this time, he was able to use all three systems assigned for station use and, since he will be able to get help from Kernel F. TRENTH (q.v.) if necessary, he should have no difficulty with them. Further training would be required if mail channels or higher level systems were to be used.7.  Instructor: Myoses A. CROLLS FOOD Chief, KURIOT LaboratorySECRET
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 182]
# SECRETLANGUAGE DATA RECORD1078941. NAME (Last-First-Middle)SMITH, Joseph S,2. LANGUAGEGermanPART I-GENERAL4: TODAY'S DATEMay 2 20073. DATE OF BIRTHJun 10 19639. I HAVE NO PROFICIENCY IN ANY FOREIGN LANGUAGESECTION A.PART 11-LANGUAGE ELEMENTSReading (40)1. I CAN READ TEXTS OF ANY DIFFICULTY OF A GENERAL NATURE OR in FIELDS I AM FAMILIAR WITH. USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY.2. I CAN READ TEXTS OF MOST GRADES OF DIFFICULTY OF A GENERAL NATURE OR IN FIELDS I AM FAMILIAR WITH, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.3. I CAN READ TEXTS OF AVERAGE DIFFICULTY (Newspapers, reference materials, etc.). USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY.4. I CAN READ SIMPLE TEXTS. SUCH AS STREET SIGNS, NEWSPAPER HEADLINES, ETC., USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY5. I HAVE NO READING ABILITY IN THE LANGUAGE.SECTION B.Writing (41)1. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR MATERIAL WITH COMPLETE SUCCESS WITHOUT USING THE DICTIONARY. I CAN WRITE FACTUAL NARRATIVE AND EXPOSITORY MATERIAL WITH REASONABLE CLARITY, WITH VERY FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS, IN NATIVE STYLE. USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY.2. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL WITH COMPLETE SUCCESS, USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY. I CAN WRITE FACTUAL NARRATIVE AND EXPOSITORY MATERIAL WITH REASONABLE CLARITY, WITH FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS, BUT IN A STYLE WHICH MAY NOT BE NATIVE, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.3. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL, WITH REASONABLE SUCCESS IN CONVEYING MY MEANING BUT WITH OCCASIONAL MINOR GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND IN OBVIOUSLY FOREIGN, AWKWARD STYLE, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.4. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL, WITH REASONABLE SUCCESS IN CONVEYING MY MEANING, BUT WITH MANY GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND IN A VERY FOREIGN, AWKWARD STYLE. USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY.5. I CANNOT WRITE IN THE LANGUAGESECTION C.Pronunciation (42)1. MY PRONUNCIATION IS NATIVE2. WHILE NATIVES CAN DETECT AN ACCENT IN MY PRONUNCIATION THEY HAVE NO DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING ME.3. MY PRONUNCIATION IS OBVIOUSLY FOREIGN, BUT ONLY RARELY CAUSES DIFFICULTY FOR NATIVES TO UNDERSTAND4. MY PRONUNCIATION IS OCCASIONALLY DIFFICULT FOR NATIVES TO UNDERSTAND.5. I HAVE NO SKILL IN PRONUNCIATION.CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDESECRET
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 183]
CONTINUATION OF PART II-LANGUAGE ELEMENTSSECTION D.Speaking (43) OFFICE OF PERSONNEL1. I SPEAK FLUENTLY AND ACCURATELY IN ALL PRACTICAL AND SOCIAL SITUATIONS: I CONVERSE FREELY AND IDIOMATICALLY IN ALL FIELDS WITH WHICH I AM FAMILIAR.May 6 2-31 PM '572. I SPEAK FLUENTLY AND ACCURATELY IN NEARLY ALL PRACTICAL AND SOCIAL SITUATIONS: I CAN CONVERSE IN MOST FIELDS WITH WHICH I AM FAMILIAR AND I EMPLOY SOME POPULAR SAYINGS, LITERARY QUOTATIONS, AND COMMON PROVERBS.   MAIL ROOM3. I GET ALONG QUITE WELL IN SITUATIONS OF DAILY LIFE AND TRAVEL AND CAN CONDUCT ROUTINE BUSINESS IN PARTICULAR FIELDS.4. I MANAGE TO GET ALONG IN THE MOST COMMON SITUATIONS OF DAILY LIFE AND TRAVEL.5. I HAVE NO ABILITY TO USE THE LANGUAGE IN ANY OF THE ABOVE ASPECTS.SECTION E.Understanding (14)1. I UNDERSTAND NON TECHNICAL CONVERSATION ON ALL SUBJECTS, BOTH FACE-TO-FACE AND ON THE TELEPHONE: I UNDERSTAND NEARLY EVERYTHING I HEAR ON THE RADIO AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES.2. I UNDERSTAND NON TECHNICAL CONVERSATION ON NEARLY ALL SUBJECTS, BOTH FACE-TO-FACE AND ON THE TELEPHONE: I UNDERSTAND MOST OF WHAT I HEAR ON THE RADIO AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES, INCLUDING MOST JOKES AND PUNS.3. I UNDERSTAND NEARLY ALL CONVERSATION ON TOPICS OF DAILY LIFE AND TRAVEL, BOTH FACE-TO-FACE AND ON THE TELEPHONE: I UNDERSTAND MUCH OF WHAT I HEAR ON THE RADIO, AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES.4. I UNDERSTAND THE SIMPLEST CONVERSATION, BOTH FACE-TO-FACE AND ON THE TELEPHONE: I UNDERSTAND SOME OF WHAT I HEAR ON THE RADIO AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES.5. I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE SPOKEN LANGUAGE.BEFORE CONTINUING - CHECK PART 11 TO ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE CIRCLED ONE NUMBER PER SECTION.PART 111-EXPERIENCE AS TRANSLATOR OR INTERPRETER (45)1. I HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE AS A TRANSLATOR.2. I HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE AS AN INTERPRETER.3. BOTH OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS APPLY.4. NONE OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS APPLY.PART IV-CERTIFICATIONI CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.THIS CERTIFICATION CONSTITUTES MY APPLICATION FOR A MAINTENANCE AWARD AS ELIGIBLE UNDER THE TERMS OF REGULATION NO. 75-115, PART IC14). I UNDERSTAND THAT I MUST PASS AN OBJECTIVE LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY TEST BEFORE I BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR AN AWARD, AND THAT IRRESPECTIVE OF THE DATE OF TESTING, ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AWARDS WILL BE CUMULATIVE AS OF THE ANNIVERSARY DATE OF COMPLETING THIS FORM.DATE SIGNEDSIGNATURE2 May 19574011473E
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 184]
SECRETLANGUAGE DATA RECORDPART I-GENERAL1078941. NAME (Last-First-Middle)SMITH, Joseph 5.2. DATE OF BIRTHJune 16 19213. LANGUAGEJapanese 3794. TODAY'S DATEMay 2 19575. I HAVE NO PROFICIENCY IN ANY FOREIGN LANGUAGEPART II-LANGUAGE ELEMENTSSECTION A. Reading (40)1. I CAN READ TEXTS OF ANY DIFFICULTY, OF A GENERAL NATURE OR IN FIELDS I AM FAMILIAR WITH, USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY.2. I CAN READ TEXTS OF MOST GRADES OF DIFFICULTY OF A GENERAL NATURE OR IN FIELDS I AM FAMILIAR WITH, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.3. I CAN READ TEXTS OF AVERAGE DIFFICULTY (newspapers, reference materials, etc.). USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY4. I CAN READ SIMPLE TEXTS, SUCH AS STREET SIGNS, NEWSPAPER HEADLINES, ETC., USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY.5. I HAVE NO READING ABILITY IN THE LANGUAGE.SECTION B. Writing (41)1. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR MATERIAL WITH COMPLETE SUCCESS WITHOUT USING THE DICTIONARY. I CAN WRITE FACTUAL NARRATIVE AND EXPOSITORY MATERIAL WITH SEASONABLE CLARITY, WITH VERY FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS, IN NATIVE STYLE, USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY.2. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL WITH COMPLETE SUCCESS, USING THE DICTIONARY ONLY RARELY. I CAN WRITE FACTUAL NARRATIVE AND EXPOSITORY MATERIAL WITH REASONABLE CLARITY, WITH FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS, BUT IN A STYLE WHICH MAY NOT BE NATIVE, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.3. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL, WITH REASONABLE SUCCESS IN CONVEYING MY MEANING, BUT WITH OCCASIONAL MINOR GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND IN OBVIOUSLY FOREIGN, AWKWARD STYLE, USING THE DICTIONARY OCCASIONALLY.4. I CAN WRITE PERSONAL LETTERS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE MATERIAL, WITH REASONABLE SUCCESS IN CONVEYING MY MEANING, BUT WITH MANY GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND IN A VERY FOREIGN, AWKWARD STYLE. USING THE DICTIONARY FREQUENTLY.5. I CANNOT WRITE IN THE LANGUAGE.SECTION C. Pronunciation (42)1. MY PRONUNCIATION IS NATIVE.2. WHILE NATIVES CAN DETECT AN ACCENT IN MY PRONUNCIATION THEY HAVE NO DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING ME.3. MY PRONUNCIATION IS OBVIOUSLY FOREIGN, BUT ONLY RARELY CAUSES DIFFICULTY FOR NATIVES TO UNDERSTAND.4. MY PRONUNCIATION IS OCCASIONALLY DIFFICULT FOR NATIVES TO UNDERSTAND.5. I HAVE NO SKILL IN PRONUNCIATION.CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDESECRET
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 185]
CONTINUATION OF PART 11-LANGUAGE ELEMENTSSECTION D. Speaking (43)1. I SPEAK FLUENTLY AND ACCURATELY IN ALL PRACTICAL AND SOCIAL SITUATIONS: I CONVERSE FREELY AND 10IOMATICALLY IN ALL PILLDA arte SHICH I AM FAMILIAR.2. I SPEAK FRUENTLY AND ACCURATELY IN NEARLY ALL PRACTICAL AND SOCIAL SITUATIONS, I CAN CONSEASE IN MOST FIELDS #ITH MINIAM. FAMILIAR AND I EMPLOY SOME POPULAR SAVINGS, LITERARY, QUOTATIONS, AND COMUON PROVERBS.3. I GET ALONG QUITE DELL IN SITUATIONS OF DAILY LIFE AND TRAVEL AND CAN CONDUCT AGUTINE BUSINESS IN PARTICULAR FIELDS4. I MANAGE TO GET ALONG IN THE MOST COMMON SITUATIONS OF DAILY LIFE AND TRAVEL.5. I HAVE NO ABILITY TO USE THE LANGUAGE IN ANY OF THE ABOVE RESPECTS.SECTION E. Understanding (44)1. I UNDERSTAND NON TECHNICAL CONVERSATION ON ALL SUBJECTS, BOTH FACE TO FACE AND ON THE TELEPHONEL I UNDERSTAND NEARLY EVERYTHING I HEAR ON THE RADIO AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES.2. FUNDEDSTAND ON TECHNICAL CONVERSATION ON, NEARLY ALL SUBJECTS: BOTH FACE TO FACE AND ON THE TELEPHONE I LINDERSTAND MOST OF WHAT I HEAR ON THE RADIO AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES, INCLUDING MOST JOKES AND PUNS.3. I UNDERSTAND HEADLY ALL CONVERSATION ON FOPICS OF DAILY LIFE AND TRAVEL, BOTH FACE TO FACE AND ON THE TELE PHONLI I UNDERSTAND MUCH OF WHAT I HEAR ON THE PADIO, AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES..4. I UNDERSTAND THE SIMPLESI CONVERSATION. SOTH FACE TO FACE AND ON THE TELEPHONES I UNDERSTAND SOME OF OMAT ILAR ON THE HADIO AND AT THE MOVIES, PLAYS, AND LECTURES.5. I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE SPOKEN LANGUAGE.BEFORE CONTINUING - CHECK PART II TO ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE CIRCLED ONE NUMBER PER SECTION.PART 111-EXPERIENCE AS TRANSLATOR OR INTERPRETER (45)1. I HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE AS A TRANSLATOR.2. I HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE AS AN INTERPRETEO.3. BOTH OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS APPLY.4. NGHE OF THE ABOVE STATEMENT'S APPLY.PART IV-CERTIFICATIONI CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN ABOVE IS BUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. TM15 CERTIFICATION CONSTITUTES MY APPLICATION FOR'A MAINTENANCE ADARD PROVIDED I AM CLIGIBLE UNDER THE TERMS OF HEGULATION 40. 79-115. PAR. 1014). I UNDERSTAND THAT MUST PASS AN OBJECTIVE LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY TEST BEFORE I BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR AN AGARD, AND THAT PINDESPECTIVE OF THE DATE OF TESTING, SANDAL MAINTENANCE ARANDS BILL BE CUULLATIVE AS OF THE ANNIVERSARY DATE OF COMPLETING THIS FORM.DATE SINED2 May 1067SIGNATUNI![signature]
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 186]
CONFIDENTIAL 15 February 1956FITNESS REPORT Part PERFORMANCEINSTRUCTIONSSECTION ASMITH Joseph B. GLAFRAL16 June 1921 M DPFel, Singapore Ops Officer. (PP)GS-13 Year pri to departure on 24 May 1956.May 1955SECTION BRated after his departure.CERTIFICATION24 July 1956 Robert A. Barmick Chief of StationPosted For.  WNDATEAug 1956.  R. H. Linn Chief, FE/5.SECTION C:Figure 1 (face)CONFIDENTIAL
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 187]
14-0000015 February 1956CONFIDENTIAL1. Ne the in the aces in to the more dutice performed doing rating period. Place the the most important first. In not more of important.2. Hate performance on each specific duty considering duty time.3. For supervisors: Ability to supervise will always be rated on duty time. Where does4. Compare to your weed, when possible, the individual being rated with others performing the same duty at a similar level of responsibility.5. Rate individuals with the same job titles way be performing different duties. It not rate them on different duties.6. Be specific. Examples of the kind of duties that might be rated are:   OEM BRIEFING  WAS AND ADM ENGUIRING  CONTINUITY INTRODUCTIONS   GIVING LATURES  DEVELOP PROGRAM  PREPARES SUMMARIES   CONDUCTING SEMINARS  ANALYSES INDUSTRIAL REPORTS  TRANSLATER GREMAN   GETTING TRIMMECAI EXPORTS  MANAGERS FILES  MARIEPING SUBICES   TYPING  OPERATAS RADIO  RADIO WORKS   COORDINATES OTHER AGENCIES7. For some jobs, duties may be broken down even further of supervisor considerable advisable, e.g., combined day and phone operation in the case of a radio operator.   TAKING DICTATION   SUPERVISING   PREPARES CORRESPONDENCE   MAINTAINS HER CONDITIOMING   EVALCATES SIGNIFICANCE OF DATAPlaming, developing unilaterallocal operations5Writes intelligence reports andestimates5Case officer for unilateraloperations5Handling of Station KUCAGEcorrespondence5Liaison with SMOOTHER, especiallySMOTH on KUCAGE5Liaison with and work for QKFLOWAGEand ODACID5Smith is an intelligence, sincere, imaginative, hard-working, loyal KUBARK officer who is a definite credit to the organization. He has carried out all his assignments in a most professional manner and has served as a most useful and respected member of the team. His judgment and opinions are respected by his colleagues both in KUBARK and CDACID.SECTION 0.SUITABILITY FOR CURRENT JOB IN ORGANIZATIONTake this account here everything you know about the individuals. (productively, conduct of office, habite, special defects or talents) and how he/she fits in with your team. Comments of any other defining should be noted.![photo of the filled section D]OFFICE OF PERSONNELSEP 12 11 17 AH 56MAIL ROOMFigure 1 (back)CONFIDENTIAL
[104-10291-10001.pdf — page 188]
CONFIDENTIALFITNESS REPORT (PART HE. DENTIAL)INSTRUCTIONSSECTION ISMITH Joseph B. GENERAL 16 June 1921 M DPSingapore Ops: Officer (PP)GS-13 Year prior May 1955 to 24 May 1956.SECTION XRobert A. Barnack Chief of Station24 July 1956Aug. 1956 R. H. Linn Chief, FE/5SECTION G.Posted FEB DATE 13'1956Reviewed by PCONFIDENTIAL