Francesco/who-killed-jfk huggingface dataset:
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 162]
# FITNESS REPORTSECRETEMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER017974## SECTION A1. NAME:FOX Jerome J.2. DATE OF BIRTH: 0 Oct 19283. SEX: M4. GRADE: GS-125. BD: D6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE:   Ops Officer7. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT: DDP/FE/VNC/VN8. CURRENT STATION: Headquarters9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENT:CAREER RESERVE TEMPORARY10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORT:CAREER/PROVISIONALINITIALXX ANNUALREASSIGNMENT SUPERVISOR REASSIGNMENT ELIPLOYESPECIAL (Specify)11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.: January 196412. REPORT PERIOD (From - to):    April - 31 January 1964## SECTION B**W - Weak** Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C.**A - Adequate** Performance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence.**P - Proficient** Performance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.**S - Strong** Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.**O - Outstanding** Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.## SPECIFIC DUTIESList up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1RATING LETTERAssembles available information on North Vietnam, and its diplomatic establishments abroad.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2RATING LETTERActs as ZRGRAIL officer for Vietnam Desk.PSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3RATING LETTERAids in giving operational support to denied areas ops program run by Saigon Station.PSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4RATING LETTERPrepares periodic reports on progress of denied area ops program.SSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5RATING LETTERSPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6RATING LETTER## OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.RATING LETTERP17 MAR 1964FORM 45 OBSOLETE PREVIOUS EDITIONS.SECRET
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 165]
# SECRET(ften Filled in)## NARRATIVE COMMENTSIndicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to overall performance. Some suggestions made for improvement of work performance, give recommendations for training. Comment on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must be described, if applicable.Subject during his tour of duty at this station demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the Factory Markings program and was sincere and competent in performing his duties. The establishment of the joint center (Comet) was a creditable achievement which should make an important contribution to the program in the years to come. He was cooperative and willing to undertake additional duties when requested. He has done an outstanding job in the training of both ODYOKE and foreign personnel.The reporting officer feels that Subject has a tendency to procrastinate and that on a few occasions he did not follow through on his commitments as aggressively as he might have. This, however, was the only weakness noticed in an otherwise competent performance.## CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS### BY EMPLOYEE1. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORTDATE4/23/63SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEEJerome Fox### BY SUPERVISOR2. IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION FR whomMONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN UNDER MY SUPERVISIONHAS ALREADY DEPARTED TO NEA POST to employce 4/23/6315 MONTHSDATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISORTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE19 Oct 1962/s/ Elmer F. Hintz### BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL3. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIALConcurDATEOFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIALTYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE22 Oct 1962S COS. Joker/s/ Robert P. Wheeler
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 166]
# FITNESS REPORTSECTION A1. NAME   FOX Jerome J.6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE:   Ops Officer9. CHECK(X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENT   CAREER RESERVE TEMPORARY   CAREER-PROVISIONAL   SPECIAL11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P.    January 1964SECTION BApril-31 January 1964List up to six of the most Important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY Yoffectiveness in performance of that duty. All aployees with supervisory responsibilities MUST ba rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees superel.SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1Assembles available information on North Vietnam, and its diplomatic establishments abroad.SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2Acts as ZRGRAIL officer for Vietnam Dosk.SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3Aids in giving operational support to denied areas ops program run by Saigon Station.SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4Prepares periodic reports on progress of dented area ops program.SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5.SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITIONTake into account everything about the employee which influencas his effectiveness in his current position such as performance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent porsonal traits or habits,particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance, during the rating period place the lotter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of portoricon.GENERAL2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. SEX   9 Oct 1928 M7. OFF/DIV/BR OF ASSIGNMENT. CURRENT STATION   DDP/FE/VNC/VN Headquarters10. CHECK (K) TYPE OF REPORT.    INITIAL    ANNUALPERFORMANCE EVALUATIONRATING LETTERSRATING LETTERPRATING LETTERPRATING LETTERSRATING LETTERRATING LETTERP
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 170]
Confirmation of Section BiSpecific Duty No. 3collection techniques applicable to the FMCP.Specific Duty No. 4* KUDOVS elements, particularly the Japanese Liaison Staff.
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 173]
Continuation of Section B:Specific Duty No. 3collection techniques applicable to the FMCP.Specific Duty No. 4KUDOVE elements, particularly the Japanese Liaison StaffContinuation of Section E:and experience in the broader, analytical aspects of the KUCHAP area, including language and area studies.Continuation of Section F-3:normal administrative responsiblities.
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 175]
14-00000
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 176]
Continuation of Section EtIn recognition of subject officer's outstanding performance to date and in view of the considerable responsibilities incicent to the post of Pactory Harkings representative in this area, I recomend that subject officer be promoted to the grade of CS-12 as soon as possible.
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 179]
# S-E-C-R-E-T# REPORT OF TRAININGOperations Familiarization Course No. 17## I. IDENTIFYING INFORMATIONName: FOX, Jorono Sex: MaleDate of Birth: 9 October 1920 Grade or Rank: GS-11EOD Date: 15 June 1953 Office: ORRDates of Course: 6 Apr - 15 May 59 No. of Students: 25Projected Assignment or Present Position: Factory Markingo Officer in Tokyo.(from Request for Internal Training)## II. DESCRIPTION OF COURSEThe Operations Familiarization Course is a six-week course designed primarily for Clandestine Services non-case officer personnel and for non-Clandestine Services officers whose responsibilities in support of operations require adequate familiarization with case officer functions and with the programs and operations of the Clandestine Services.## III. REPORT OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENTTo satisfactorily complete the Operations Familiarization Course the student must demonstrate in a series of seminars and in a limited number of written assignments that he has acquired an adequate understanding of the fundamentals of clandestine operations. Testing mechanisms are minimal and do not permit an extensive evaluation of individual performance.Fox satisfactorily completed Operations Fallterisation Course No. 17.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:Chief Instructor, OFCChief, Field TrainingS-E-C-R-E-T
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 180]
### IDENTIFYING INFORMATION|                      || -------------------- || NAME                 || FOX, Jerome          || DATE OF BIRTH        || 9 Oct 1928           || PROJECTED ASSIGNMENT ||              || ------------ || SEX          || Male         || EOD DATE     || 15 June 1955 ||                       || --------------------- || DATES OF COURSE       || 5 Jan - 13 March 1959 || GRADE OR RANK         || 08-11                 ||                 || --------------- || NO. OF STUDENTS || 3               || OFFICE          || ORB             |Analytic position in ST/FM## SECTION II: SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COURSEThis course lasts 10 weeks. The classes are held 2 hours per day, 5 days a week Students are required to do a minimum of 10 hours per week of drill in the language. Laboratory outside of class hours. The instructor is able to meet at any time by appointment with each student individually. Students are given at least two major tests and a number of ten-minute tests during the progress of the course.## SECTION III: OBJECTIVESThe general aim of this course is to provide a thorough grounding for the student who has previously had either a reading course in the language or an insufficient introduction to the language. It serves as a basis for further advancement either by independent learning in the area or by further study.The specific objectives are:A. Ability to produce and distinguish all the sounds of the language.B. Ability to use adequately a stock of correct Spanish sentences and expressions.C. Ability to analyze sentences and expressions into their components.D. Ability to comprehend rapid-speed spoken Spanish in a wide variety of non-technical situations.E. Ability to read and write informal Spanish using a limited number of vocabulary and structural items.## SECTION IV: EVALUATION RATINGThe following is an explanation of the five terms of evaluation employed below:1. The student failed to satisfy minimum requirements, and his grasp of the material is too inadequate to be functional.2. The student satisfied only the minimum requirements of the objectives. His grasp is barely functional.S-E-U-R-R-F(When filled in)
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 181]
S-886-K-S-2(when filled in)3. The student set the objectives in a creditable manner, revealing a good grasp of credentials.4. The student showed a high degree of competence in meeting the objectives.5. The student demonstrated exceptional ability or proficiency in meeting the objectives. This accomplishment was one attained by a very small number of students.## SECTION V: ACHIEVEMENT RATINGSThe number in each cell represents the number of students receiving that rating in terms of the above objectives. The Asterisk (*) represents the rating this student achieved.| Course Objectives | Rating 1 | Rating 2 | Rating 3 | Rating 4 | Rating 5 || ----------------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- || Objective A       |          |          | 2*       | 1        |          || Objective B       |          |          | 2*       | 1        |          || Objective C       |          |          | 2*       | 1        |          || Objective D       |          |          | 2*       | 1        |          || Objective E       |          |          | 2*       | 1        |          |This class on a whole is rated as:Above average ________ Average X ________ Slower than average ________## SECTION VI: COMMENTSMr. Fox performed fairly unevenly in this course. As a rule his preparations were more thorough during the first five weeks of the course.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAININGPIERRE E. NYSSignature of InstructorS-886-K-S-2(when filled in)
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 182]
SECTION I: IDENTIFYING INFORMATION|                                          |              |                     |     || ---------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------------- | --- || POK, Jorone                              | Male         | 13 Oct 58-19 Dec 58 | 6   || DATE OF BIRTH                            | FOR SERVICE  | MOS                 |     || 9 October 1928                           | 15 June 1955 | 03-11               | OSS || IF CRESTED AS MONENT OR PRESENT POSITION |              |                     |     || Analyst                                  |              |                     |     |SECTION II: SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COURSEThis course lasts 10 weeks. The classes are 5 &1/2 hours per day, 5 days a week.Students are required to do a minimum of 10 hours per week of ILL in the LanguageLaboratory outside of class hours. The training supervisor is able to meet at anyappointment with each student individually. Students are given at least two majortests and a number of miniature tests during the progression of the course.SECTION III: OBJECTIVESThe general aim of this course is to provide a thorough retraining for thestudent who has previously had service in the language or hasinsufficient introduction to the language. It serves as a basis for furtheradvancement either by independent learning in the area or by further study.The specific objectives are:Objective A. Ability to produce and distinguish all the sounds of thelanguage.Objective B. Ability to accurately translate or correct Spanish sen-tences and expressions.Objective C. Ability to analyze complex sentence structures into theircomponents.Objective D. Ability to compose more complex spoken Spanish in a widevariety of common practical situations.Objective E. Ability to read previously unseen Spanish using a limited factor of vocabulary and structural knowledge.SECTION IV: EVALUATION METHODS
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 183]
## BELVOIR FIRM NO. 3 (2321-10-0030-2380)The following is an explanation of the five-term evaluation employed below:Rating 1.The student failed to satisfy minimum requirements, and his grasp of the material is too inadequate to be functional.Rating: 2.The student satisfied only the minimum requirements of the objectives. His grasp is barely functional.Rating 3.The student met the objectives in a creditable manner, revealing a good grasp of essentials.Rating 4.The student showed a high degree of competence in meeting the objectives.Rating 5.The student demonstrated exceptional ability on proficiency in meeting the objectives. His accomplishment was one attained by a very small number of students.SECTION VI: ACHIEVEMENT RATINGSThe number in each cell represents the number of students receiving that rating in terms of the above objectives. The asterisk (*) represents the Rating the student achieved.| Course Objectives | Rating 1 | Rating 2 | Rating 3 | Rating 4 | Rating 5 || ----------------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- || Objective A       |          | 1        | 2        | 2*       | 1        || Objective B       |          |          | 3*       | 3        |          || Objective C       |          |          | 4*       | 2        |          || Objective D       |          |          | 3*       | 3        |          || Objective E       |          |          | 3        | 3*       |          |This class as a whole is rated as:Above average Average X Slower than averageSECTION VII: COMMENTSSince reading skills are stressed during the latter part of the 30-week course series, the rating for Objective E is based on a limited amount of information.FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:/s/ PIERRE E. HYBSIGNATURE OF UNIT INSTRUCTOR
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 197]
SECRETTRAINING EVALUATIONINTEL IGACE PARTI 10. aSECTION I: IDENTIFYING INFORMATION|                                        |                           || -------------------------------------- | ------------------------- || NAME                                   | FOX, Jaromo               || DATES OF COURSE                        | 26 Sept. - 21 Oct.        || DATE OF BIRTH                          | 9 October 1928            || EOD, DATE                              | 15 June 1955              || GRADE OR RANK                          | 08-7                      || PROJECT ASSIGNMENT OR CURRENT POSITION | Identification Specialist |SECTION 11: OBJECTIVES OF THE CURSE1.  To introduce students to the skills and methods involved in the processing of intelligence materials2.  To provide practice in the oral and written presentation of intelligence for a variety of purposes.SECTION III: SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COURSEIntelligence Principles and Methods is a four weeks (160 hours) extension of Basic Orientation Course for personnel who are or will be engaged in the production of intelligence. Emphasis is on "learning by doing", through the medium of a series of integrated written exercises which require processing of actual intelligence documents. Exercise is also gained in the oral presentation of Intelligence through a series of briefings before the class. Each student is assigned a special research problem for which approximately 40 hours are allotted in the course schedule. The results are presented to follow-students and instructors in an oral briefing at the close of the course. The student also prepares an annotated bibliography, and writes a critical review of one of his chief sources,SECTION IV: HOW THE STUDENTS ARE EVALUATEDWritten exercises are graded independently by at least two members of the instructional staff on the basis of how well the student has fulfilled the requirements of selectivity, orientation, accuracy to original documents, and clarity of style. Graded for each type of written exercise and rating in Section V. Oral briefings are evaluated by both instructors and fellow students through the use of written critique sheets and oral observations following each presentation. A composite grade is given for the oral briefings, in the evaluation of the research problems (knowledge of subject, intelligence focus, exploitation of sources, and general quality of the written and oral presentation. The grades are defined as follows:SUPERIOR: The student demonstrated outstanding ability or thorough knowledge of the subject.
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 198]
5-E-C-R-E-T-2-## Section IV. How the Students are Evaluated (Contd.)**EXCELLENT:** The student showed unusual competence, skill or ability in meeting this objective or goal; he demonstrated a thorough grasp of the presented material, or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated that he can perform in an extremely effective manner in this area.**SATISFACTORY:** The student met this objective in a competent and adequate manner; he demonstrated a good understanding and grasp of the information presented, or, if skills are involved, he demonstrated sufficient competence to operate effectively in this area.**POOR:** Although the student may have met some of the standards set for minimum achievement of this course goal or objective, he demonstrated serious gaps in knowledge or sufficient lack of skill to be of doubtful competence.**FAILURE:** The student was unable to grasp the concepts of information presented, or demonstrated that he had not acquired the necessary information and skills to operate at even minimum capacity in this area.## SECTION V: REPORT OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENTFigures show grade distribution. The asterisk indicates grade this student received.| SUBJECT                                | FAIL | POOR | SAT | EXC | SUP || -------------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | --- || 1. Exercise - Interview Reporting      | 0    | 0    | 6*  | 7   | 1   || 2. Exercise - Brief Daily Intell. Item | 0    | 0    | 7   | 6*  | 1   || 3. Exercise - Periodical Intell. Item  | 0    | 0    | 5*  | 9   | 0   || 4. Critical Book Review                | 0    | 0    | 4   | 7*  | 3   || 5. Research Problem                    | 0    | 0    | 6*  | 7   | 1   || 6. Skill in Oral Briefing              | 0    | 0    | 6*  | 8   | 0   |## SECTION VI: INSTRUCTORS OVER-ALL EVALUATIONIn terms of all factors observed during the course and taking into account this student's experience in the Agency, grade, and general area of work, an "X" in one of the boxes shows the judgment of the instructional staff of his performance.| Fail | Poor | Minus | Satisfactory | Plus | Excellent | Superior || ---- | ---- | ----- | ------------ | ---- | --------- | -------- ||      |      |       | x            |      |           |          |COMMENTS:FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:![signature of the Chief Instructor]Chief Instructor
[104-10291-10000.pdf — page 199]
S-E-C-R-E-T-3-THIS PAGE OF THE REPORT IS NOT RE SHOWN TO THE STUDENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES## SECTION VII: INSTRUCTORS' COMMENTSObservations of the instructional staff, especially on habits, characteristics, strengths, weaknesses or anything that may have influenced the student's performance in the course are reported here.Mr. Fox's performance in the course was no more than average, but he applied himself to the work and was interested in getting something out of the instruction. Mr. Fox took "Economic Relations between Afghanistan and the USSR" as the topic for his research project and did considerable work on the subject, in spite of a dearth of material. His critical review was workmanlike and showed that he had put a definite effort into preparing it.Mr. Fox improved throughout the course in his oral briefing, although at no time were they well organized or concise. When his faults were pointed out to him, he made a genuine attempt to remedy them. Mr. Fox also has the capability of self-criticism; he frequently recognized his mistakes himself and was interested in discussing them with his adviser. Although his performance was frequently disappointing, I believe that he obtained considerable benefit from the course as he was genuinely anxious to learn and improve.This evaluation, shown by an "X" in one of the boxes, takes into account this training record, the student's age, grade, Agency experience, and projected assignment. It is included for the purpose of giving supervisors an estimate of the implications of the training evaluation report for the student's assignment and career potential.Fall    Poor    Minus   Satisfactory    Plus    Excellent Superior0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Training Officer's Comments:Training OfficerS-S-C-R-E-T